# Determination of Arsenic in Drinking Water Samples by Electrothermal Atomic Absorption Spectrometry after Preconcentration Using the Biomass ofAspergillus niger Loaded on Activated Charcoal

Authors: Mohsen Shahlaei; Alireza Pourhossein
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

A simple, fast, and sensitive method for determination of total arsenic in drinking water sample by ETAAS after solid phase preconcentration has been developed. The dead biomass ofA. niger loaded on activated charcoal has been applied as bioadsorbent for preconcentration step. The effects of parameters such as pH, type and concentration of eluent, biosorption time, sample volume, and effect of interfering ions have also been studied. Under the optimum condition, the enrichment factor of 10 for the analyte has been obtained. The accuracy of the method has been investigated by the recovery of spiked standards and the recovery percents between 99 and 102% have been achieved. Total amount of arsenic was determined by reducing As (V) to As (III) with potassium iodide (KI) and ascorbic acid in HCl solution. Under the optimum conditions, for 400 mL of drinking water samples, the detection limit (3σ) and linear range were achieved 1 ng/mL and 5–100 ng/mL, respectively. The relative standard deviation for ten determinations of a spiked sample with concentration of 10 ng/mL As was 3.2%.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Arsenic is a toxic trace element widely distributed in nature. The malignant symptoms may appear even when trace arsenic is ingested. The toxicity mechanism of arsenic has been shown that it binds to enzymes, which are inhibited for functioning [1]. Arsenic is present in water, soils, rocks, and all living things (plants and animals); also, it is accumulative poison that affects all bodily systems [2–4]. Because of its high toxicity, it is of great importance to regularly monitor and recover arsenic from different samples such as natural waters. Recently, WHO prescribes a limit of 10 ng/mL for total As in drinking waters [5]. The analysis of such low levels demands highly sensitive techniques. Some analytical techniques have been used for trace determination of arsenic such as colorimetry [6, 7], atomic absorption spectrometry [7, 8], hydride generation system combined with atomic absorption spectrometry [9], inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry [10, 11], and atomic fluorescence spectrometry [12]. Recently, electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometery has been extremely used as a powerful technique for determination of arsenic in various samples [13]. The results obtained by ETAAS show good sensitivity and low detection limits. But the sensitivity of analysis by ETAAS can decrease because of aging of graphite tube which is used as atomizer. Therefore in order to achieve accurate, sensitive and reliable results at ultratrace levels of As with ETAAS, preconcentration step is required prior to analyte determination. A number of procedures involving  liquid-liquid extraction [14], anodic stripping voltammetry [15], hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry [16, 17], energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence, and solid phase extraction [18] have been used for the determination of the low concentration levels of arsenic. Recently, solid phase extraction, using microbial biomass, has been studied as an alternative method for preconcentration of trace elements for determination of contaminants in waters. Biological microorganisms including fungi [19], yeast [20, 21], bacteria [22], and algae [23] have been shown to efficiently accumulate trace elements from aqueous solutions. Recently, several review articles [24, 25] are published that illustrate the latest developments in the biosorption of metals by microbial biomass for analyte preconcentration, matrix separation, and speciation analysis. Because of many binding sites on the cell wall of microorganisms they have good ability for adsorption of trace elements from solutions. The biomass of Aspergillus niger, the byproduct of citric acid fermentation, has also been used for preconcentration of some trace elements such as iron [26], lead and nickel [27], and chromium, copper, zinc, and cadmium [28]. The previous works have used A. niger loaded on silica gel and sepiolite for preconcentration of analytes [26–28]. Littera et al. applied biomass of A. niger for removal of arsenic from aqueous environments in native and modified forms [29]. The aim of this study is the use of A. niger, loaded on activated charcoal, as biosorbent, for preconcentration of As in water samples prior to determination with ETAAS. Some effective parameters such as pH, sample volume, type and concentration of eluents, and effect of interfering ions, have been optimized. The method was applied successfully for preconcentration of arsenic prior determination with ETAAS.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Preparation of Biosorbent

TheA. niger strain used in this work was prepared from the Kimia Gharb Industrial Company, Kermanshah, Iran. The biomass was produced by transferring of spores to the fermentation medium according to our previous work [30]. The grown cells were then separated with filtration, rinsed several times with deionized water, and then oven-dried at 80°C for 24 h. For the biosorption studies, the dried biomass was ground to powder in a disintegrator and sieved to a diameter of 0.05–0.1 mm. The biomass produced was separated by filtration and the resulting biomass was washed thoroughly for several times with distilled water. The biomass was treated with hydrochloric acid (1N), washed with distilled water to bring the pH of the biomass in neutral range, and dried in an oven at 105°C for 24 hr. 600 mg of dry A. niger was mixed with 2.0 g of granular activated charcoal (meshes 4–12). 5 mL of water was added to the mixture and thoroughly mixed. After mixing, the mixture was heated in an oven at 1050°C for 1 h to dry. The above procedure was repeated to maximize the contact between A. niger and activated charcoal.


### 2.2. Water Sample Preparation

Drinking water samples were filtered and subjected to ultraviolet (UV) digestion for 2 h before preconcentration. Then the pH of samples was adjusted with a buffer to 6 and the samples were stored in a cool place.


### 2.3. General Preconcentration Procedure

The dried biomass was grinded, sieved (with mesh 15), and washed twice by proper amounts of solution with the optimized pH of procedure. 400 mL of sample containing 10 ng/mg As was taken and As (V) was reduced to As (III) with 1 mol L−1 of KI and ascorbic acid [31]. Then the pH was adjusted to the optimum value found experimentally with hydrochloric acid or ammonia. 2.0 grams of the prepared adsorbent was added, to the sample solution and mixed for 1 hr. the mixed solution passed through a vacuum filter. The resulted cake was quantitatively transferred to a tube, 30 mL of 1 M sulfuric acid was added and the solution was shaken for 2 min and then filtered again using vacuum filter. The bottom of the filter paper and sample tube was washed with 10 mL of 1 M sulfuric acid. 10 μL of the filtrate and 10 μL of modifier were simultaneously injected to the graphite tube for the determination of arsenic by ET AAS. The recovery of analytes was calculated from the ratio of the concentration found by ETAAS to that calculated theoretically.


### 2.4. Instruments and Apparatus

An AA-6650 atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Co. Ltd., Japan) equipped with a deuterium lamp background correction system, a GFA-EX7 graphite furnace and an ASC-6100 autosampler was employed for the determination of arsenic. Hallow cathode lamps (HCL) were used as the light source. All the measurements were based on integrated absorbance. The wavelengths used were 193.7 nm (slit 0.5 nm) for arsenic. Pyrocoated graphite tubes, with integrated platforms or L’vov platforms (Shimadzu Co. Ltd., Japan), were used for the atomization of arsenic.


### 2.5. ETAAS Detection

The samples were analyzed by ETAAS under optimum conditions. The adjustment of instrument was performed according to Table1. A mixture of Pd(
NO
3
)
2 and Mg(
NO
3
)
2 was used as a chemical modifier for As determination. 10 μL of sample solution and 10 μL of chemical modifier were simultaneously injected into the pyrocoated graphite tube of furnace. Calibration curve has been used for determination of arsenic amount in samples.Table 1
Measurement condition for determination of arsenic using AA-6650 Shimadzu atomic absorption spectrophotometer.
Parameter
Setting
Wavelength
193.7 nm
Band pass
0.5 nm
Signal measurement
AA-BG (peak height)
Type of tube
Pyrolytic coated
Type of inert gas
Helium
Type of lamp
Hallow cathode lamp
Lamp current
10 mA


### 2.6. Reagents

Chemicals were of ultrapure grade and ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ·cm), obtained from a Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore, Bedford, MA), was used throughout. A stock standard solution (1 g L−1) of arsenic was supplied by Merck (Merck, Darmstad, Germany). Granular activated charcoal (mesh 4–12) was purchased from Ghatran Shimi (Tehran, Iran). Working solutions were obtained by appropriate dilution of the standard ones. The mixed Pd and Mg(
NO
3
)
2 matrix modifier solution was prepared by placing 2.0 mL 5% Mg(
NO
3
)
2 (Merck, Darmstad, Germany) solution and 2.0 mL 1% Pd solution (Merck) in a 20 mL volumetric flask and diluting to volume with deionized water. The final concentration of the matrix modifier solution was 0.5% Mg(
NO
3
)
2 and 0.1% Pd. The HCl (Reagent grade, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and) and ammonia 25% (Merck) were also used for adjusting the pH. KI (Merck) and ascorbic acid (Sigma Aldrich) have been applied for reduction of As (V) to As (III). Argon with 99.999% purity was used as sheath gas for the atomizer and to purge internally. All glassware was kept in 10% nitric acid for at least 48 h and rinsed with ultrapure water before use.


## 2.1. Preparation of Biosorbent

TheA. niger strain used in this work was prepared from the Kimia Gharb Industrial Company, Kermanshah, Iran. The biomass was produced by transferring of spores to the fermentation medium according to our previous work [30]. The grown cells were then separated with filtration, rinsed several times with deionized water, and then oven-dried at 80°C for 24 h. For the biosorption studies, the dried biomass was ground to powder in a disintegrator and sieved to a diameter of 0.05–0.1 mm. The biomass produced was separated by filtration and the resulting biomass was washed thoroughly for several times with distilled water. The biomass was treated with hydrochloric acid (1N), washed with distilled water to bring the pH of the biomass in neutral range, and dried in an oven at 105°C for 24 hr. 600 mg of dry A. niger was mixed with 2.0 g of granular activated charcoal (meshes 4–12). 5 mL of water was added to the mixture and thoroughly mixed. After mixing, the mixture was heated in an oven at 1050°C for 1 h to dry. The above procedure was repeated to maximize the contact between A. niger and activated charcoal.


## 2.2. Water Sample Preparation

Drinking water samples were filtered and subjected to ultraviolet (UV) digestion for 2 h before preconcentration. Then the pH of samples was adjusted with a buffer to 6 and the samples were stored in a cool place.


## 2.3. General Preconcentration Procedure

The dried biomass was grinded, sieved (with mesh 15), and washed twice by proper amounts of solution with the optimized pH of procedure. 400 mL of sample containing 10 ng/mg As was taken and As (V) was reduced to As (III) with 1 mol L−1 of KI and ascorbic acid [31]. Then the pH was adjusted to the optimum value found experimentally with hydrochloric acid or ammonia. 2.0 grams of the prepared adsorbent was added, to the sample solution and mixed for 1 hr. the mixed solution passed through a vacuum filter. The resulted cake was quantitatively transferred to a tube, 30 mL of 1 M sulfuric acid was added and the solution was shaken for 2 min and then filtered again using vacuum filter. The bottom of the filter paper and sample tube was washed with 10 mL of 1 M sulfuric acid. 10 μL of the filtrate and 10 μL of modifier were simultaneously injected to the graphite tube for the determination of arsenic by ET AAS. The recovery of analytes was calculated from the ratio of the concentration found by ETAAS to that calculated theoretically.


## 2.4. Instruments and Apparatus

An AA-6650 atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Co. Ltd., Japan) equipped with a deuterium lamp background correction system, a GFA-EX7 graphite furnace and an ASC-6100 autosampler was employed for the determination of arsenic. Hallow cathode lamps (HCL) were used as the light source. All the measurements were based on integrated absorbance. The wavelengths used were 193.7 nm (slit 0.5 nm) for arsenic. Pyrocoated graphite tubes, with integrated platforms or L’vov platforms (Shimadzu Co. Ltd., Japan), were used for the atomization of arsenic.


## 2.5. ETAAS Detection

The samples were analyzed by ETAAS under optimum conditions. The adjustment of instrument was performed according to Table1. A mixture of Pd(
NO
3
)
2 and Mg(
NO
3
)
2 was used as a chemical modifier for As determination. 10 μL of sample solution and 10 μL of chemical modifier were simultaneously injected into the pyrocoated graphite tube of furnace. Calibration curve has been used for determination of arsenic amount in samples.Table 1
Measurement condition for determination of arsenic using AA-6650 Shimadzu atomic absorption spectrophotometer.
Parameter
Setting
Wavelength
193.7 nm
Band pass
0.5 nm
Signal measurement
AA-BG (peak height)
Type of tube
Pyrolytic coated
Type of inert gas
Helium
Type of lamp
Hallow cathode lamp
Lamp current
10 mA


## 2.6. Reagents

Chemicals were of ultrapure grade and ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ·cm), obtained from a Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore, Bedford, MA), was used throughout. A stock standard solution (1 g L−1) of arsenic was supplied by Merck (Merck, Darmstad, Germany). Granular activated charcoal (mesh 4–12) was purchased from Ghatran Shimi (Tehran, Iran). Working solutions were obtained by appropriate dilution of the standard ones. The mixed Pd and Mg(
NO
3
)
2 matrix modifier solution was prepared by placing 2.0 mL 5% Mg(
NO
3
)
2 (Merck, Darmstad, Germany) solution and 2.0 mL 1% Pd solution (Merck) in a 20 mL volumetric flask and diluting to volume with deionized water. The final concentration of the matrix modifier solution was 0.5% Mg(
NO
3
)
2 and 0.1% Pd. The HCl (Reagent grade, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and) and ammonia 25% (Merck) were also used for adjusting the pH. KI (Merck) and ascorbic acid (Sigma Aldrich) have been applied for reduction of As (V) to As (III). Argon with 99.999% purity was used as sheath gas for the atomizer and to purge internally. All glassware was kept in 10% nitric acid for at least 48 h and rinsed with ultrapure water before use.


## 3. Results and Discussion

Some preliminary experiments were carried out in order to study the preconcentration of arsenic by theA. niger dead biomass loaded on activated charcoal from drinking water samples. Some effective parameters such as pH, elution flow rate, sample volume, type and volume of the eluent, and effect of interfering ions have been investigated.


### 3.1. Effect of pH

The pH of the working solution has an important role in adsorption of trace elements on the bioadsorbents in solid phase extraction due to structural groups such as amine and carboxyl on the structure ofA. niger biomass. Therefore, the effect of pH on the biosorption of arsenic on the biosorbent was investigated. The effects of pH were studied in the pH range of 1–10 by using the dead biomass of A. niger. As shown in Figure 1, the retention of arsenic seems to be highly dependent on pH, with maximum retention occurring at pH 6. Therefore, to achieve high efficiency, good sensitivity, and lower detection limit, a pH of ~6.0 was selected for subsequent work.Figure 1
Effect of the sample pH on the preconcentration of arsenic from drinking water sample; experimental condition: 20μg/L of arsenic, sample flow rate of 5 mL/min, and the eluent of HCl 0.1 M.


### 3.2. Type and Volume of the Eluent

The type and concentration of eluent were found to have an important effect on the desorption process of the retained arsenic from the bioadsorbent. As can be seen from Figure1, the adsorption of arsenic was negligible at the higher pH; therefore the acidic eluents are suitable for desorption of adsorbed arsenic. Hydrochloric acid and sulfuric acid in different concentrations were used for elution of adsorbed arsenic. The effects of eluent volumes and concentration on the recoveries of the arsenic were also investigated. Table 2 shows the comparison between different acidic solutions for recovery of arsenic. As can be seen from Table 2 diluted HCl shows good efficiency for recovery of arsenic. Quantitative recoveries of arsenic were obtained with 1 mol/lit HCl as compared to other eluents. Therefore, the 1 mol/lit HCl were used in the following experiments to obtain a high sensitivity.Table 2
The effect of different amounts of eluents on the recovery of arsenic in the preconcentration procedure.
Number
Type of eluent
Conc. of eluent (M)
Recovery %
1
H2SO4
0.1
92.7
2
HCl
0.1
93.9
3
H2SO4
0.5
94.0
4
HCl
0.5
96.1
5
H2SO4
1
97.8
6
HCl
1
99.1


### 3.3. Effect of Sample Flow Rate

The effect of sample flow rate on the recovery of arsenic was studied in different sample flow rates of 1–9 mL/min. under optimum condition, no significant reduction in recovery was found for sample flow rate up to 5 mL/min. Therefore, flow rate of 5 mL/min as an appropriate value was the used to continue further experiments. Figure2 shows the results obtained from this experiment.Figure 2
Effect of elution rate of column on the preconcentration of arsenic from drinking water sample; pH = 6, 20μg/L of arsenic, and eluent of HCl 0.1 M.


### 3.4. Sample Volume

The effect of the sample solution volume on the arsenic sorption was studied by passing 100–800 mL volumes. The obtained results have been shown in Figure3. According to these results, the adsorption of the arsenic was not affected by sample volume below 400 mL. Above this volume of sample solution, the percent sorption decreased for the analytes. The recoveries of analytes decrease probably due to the excess analytes loaded over the biomass capacity with increasing sample volume above 400 mL. In the present study 400 mL of sample solution was adopted for the preconcentration of the investigated ions, the adsorbed metals can be eluted with 20 mL of 1 mol L−1 HCl, and a preconcentration factor of 10 is achieved.Figure 3
Effect of sample injection volume on the recovery of arsenic; condition: elution flow rate: 5 mL/min and pH = 6.


### 3.5. Effect of Biosorption Time

The influence of biosorption time on recovery of arsenic from drinking water samples has also been studied. According to obtained results (Figure3) the time longer than 60 min has no significant effect on the recovery of arsenic from sample solution. Thus the 60 min was selected as biosorption time for further studies.


### 3.6. Effect of Interfering Ions

The effects of potential interferences on the recovery of arsenic in water samples were tested using the optimized preconcentration system. In these experiments, 400 mL of solutions containing 5μg L−1 of arsenic and various amounts of interfering ions were preconcentrated according to the recommended procedure. An ion was considered to interfere when its presence produced a variation in the extraction recovery of sample more than ±5%. The results showed that in excess of 10000-fold Li
+, K
+, Na
+, Mg
+
2, Ca
2
+, and  Ba
2
+, 100-fold Zn
2
+, Fe
2
+, Fe
3
+, and  Ni
2
+, 500-fold Hg
+, Cd
2
+, Cu
2
+, Mn
2
+, Pb
2
+, Al
3
+, and  Bi
+
+, and 1000-fold of PO
4
3
-, SO
4
2
-, NO
3
-, and  Cl
- ions had no significant interferences in the preconcentration and determination of arsenic. The results have been shown in Table 3. This is particularly useful for the analysis of As in natural water samples, for example, seawater, which contains large amounts of alkali and alkaline earth metal ions.Table 3
Effect of diverse ions on the preconcentration of As (5μg/L As).
Ion
Tolerance limit(C
ion/C
As)
Li
+, K
+, Na
+, Mg
2
+, Ca
2
+, Ba
2
+
10000
NO
3
-, SO
4
2
-, NO
3
-, Cl
-
1000
Hg
+, Cd
2
+, Cu
2
+, Mn
2
+, Pb
2
+, Al
3
+, Bi
2
+
500
Zn
2
+, Fe
2
+, Fe
3+, Ni
2+,
100


## 3.1. Effect of pH

The pH of the working solution has an important role in adsorption of trace elements on the bioadsorbents in solid phase extraction due to structural groups such as amine and carboxyl on the structure ofA. niger biomass. Therefore, the effect of pH on the biosorption of arsenic on the biosorbent was investigated. The effects of pH were studied in the pH range of 1–10 by using the dead biomass of A. niger. As shown in Figure 1, the retention of arsenic seems to be highly dependent on pH, with maximum retention occurring at pH 6. Therefore, to achieve high efficiency, good sensitivity, and lower detection limit, a pH of ~6.0 was selected for subsequent work.Figure 1
Effect of the sample pH on the preconcentration of arsenic from drinking water sample; experimental condition: 20μg/L of arsenic, sample flow rate of 5 mL/min, and the eluent of HCl 0.1 M.


## 3.2. Type and Volume of the Eluent

The type and concentration of eluent were found to have an important effect on the desorption process of the retained arsenic from the bioadsorbent. As can be seen from Figure1, the adsorption of arsenic was negligible at the higher pH; therefore the acidic eluents are suitable for desorption of adsorbed arsenic. Hydrochloric acid and sulfuric acid in different concentrations were used for elution of adsorbed arsenic. The effects of eluent volumes and concentration on the recoveries of the arsenic were also investigated. Table 2 shows the comparison between different acidic solutions for recovery of arsenic. As can be seen from Table 2 diluted HCl shows good efficiency for recovery of arsenic. Quantitative recoveries of arsenic were obtained with 1 mol/lit HCl as compared to other eluents. Therefore, the 1 mol/lit HCl were used in the following experiments to obtain a high sensitivity.Table 2
The effect of different amounts of eluents on the recovery of arsenic in the preconcentration procedure.
Number
Type of eluent
Conc. of eluent (M)
Recovery %
1
H2SO4
0.1
92.7
2
HCl
0.1
93.9
3
H2SO4
0.5
94.0
4
HCl
0.5
96.1
5
H2SO4
1
97.8
6
HCl
1
99.1


## 3.3. Effect of Sample Flow Rate

The effect of sample flow rate on the recovery of arsenic was studied in different sample flow rates of 1–9 mL/min. under optimum condition, no significant reduction in recovery was found for sample flow rate up to 5 mL/min. Therefore, flow rate of 5 mL/min as an appropriate value was the used to continue further experiments. Figure2 shows the results obtained from this experiment.Figure 2
Effect of elution rate of column on the preconcentration of arsenic from drinking water sample; pH = 6, 20μg/L of arsenic, and eluent of HCl 0.1 M.


## 3.4. Sample Volume

The effect of the sample solution volume on the arsenic sorption was studied by passing 100–800 mL volumes. The obtained results have been shown in Figure3. According to these results, the adsorption of the arsenic was not affected by sample volume below 400 mL. Above this volume of sample solution, the percent sorption decreased for the analytes. The recoveries of analytes decrease probably due to the excess analytes loaded over the biomass capacity with increasing sample volume above 400 mL. In the present study 400 mL of sample solution was adopted for the preconcentration of the investigated ions, the adsorbed metals can be eluted with 20 mL of 1 mol L−1 HCl, and a preconcentration factor of 10 is achieved.Figure 3
Effect of sample injection volume on the recovery of arsenic; condition: elution flow rate: 5 mL/min and pH = 6.


## 3.5. Effect of Biosorption Time

The influence of biosorption time on recovery of arsenic from drinking water samples has also been studied. According to obtained results (Figure3) the time longer than 60 min has no significant effect on the recovery of arsenic from sample solution. Thus the 60 min was selected as biosorption time for further studies.


## 3.6. Effect of Interfering Ions

The effects of potential interferences on the recovery of arsenic in water samples were tested using the optimized preconcentration system. In these experiments, 400 mL of solutions containing 5μg L−1 of arsenic and various amounts of interfering ions were preconcentrated according to the recommended procedure. An ion was considered to interfere when its presence produced a variation in the extraction recovery of sample more than ±5%. The results showed that in excess of 10000-fold Li
+, K
+, Na
+, Mg
+
2, Ca
2
+, and  Ba
2
+, 100-fold Zn
2
+, Fe
2
+, Fe
3
+, and  Ni
2
+, 500-fold Hg
+, Cd
2
+, Cu
2
+, Mn
2
+, Pb
2
+, Al
3
+, and  Bi
+
+, and 1000-fold of PO
4
3
-, SO
4
2
-, NO
3
-, and  Cl
- ions had no significant interferences in the preconcentration and determination of arsenic. The results have been shown in Table 3. This is particularly useful for the analysis of As in natural water samples, for example, seawater, which contains large amounts of alkali and alkaline earth metal ions.Table 3
Effect of diverse ions on the preconcentration of As (5μg/L As).
Ion
Tolerance limit(C
ion/C
As)
Li
+, K
+, Na
+, Mg
2
+, Ca
2
+, Ba
2
+
10000
NO
3
-, SO
4
2
-, NO
3
-, Cl
-
1000
Hg
+, Cd
2
+, Cu
2
+, Mn
2
+, Pb
2
+, Al
3
+, Bi
2
+
500
Zn
2
+, Fe
2
+, Fe
3+, Ni
2+,
100


## 4. Performance of the System

The accuracy of the method has been validated using recovery percents of spiked solutions; as can be seen in Table4, the recovery percents in the range of 99–102 have been achieved after spiking the standard solutions to the sample. The reproducibility of the preconcentration method was evaluated using method for 400 mL of standard solution of arsenic (5 ng/mL) and repeating this procedure five times. The relative standard deviation (R.S.D.) was 3.2%, calculated from the peak areas obtained. The calibration graph using the preconcentration system for arsenic was linear with a correlation coefficient of 0.999. With the proposed system, an enhancement factor of 10 with respect to conventional ETAAS without preconcentration was obtained. The limit of detection (LOD) was calculated as the amount of analyte necessary to yield a signal equal to three times (3σ) of the standard deviation of the blank signals. Using sample volume of 400 mL a LOD of 1 ng L−1 was obtained for the determination of As. The equation for the linear range of the calibration graph was as follows: Abs
=
0.0033
[
As
]
+
0.0003, r
2
=
0.999 (1), where the calibration graph ranged between 5 and 100 ng mL−1.Table 4
Determination of total arsenic in drinking water sample (Taghe Bostan, Kermanshah, Iran) before and after spiking the standard solution of As (III).
Number
Added std(μg/L)
Found
Recovery %
1
0
N.D
—
2
10
10.2
±
0.2
102
3
20
19.8
±
0.5
99
4
50
50.8
±
0.4
101.6


## 5. Conclusions

The results showed that the proposed preconcentration procedure provides a fast, simple, and economical method for the enrichment of arsenic from natural water samples. Also, the proposed method was free of interference compared to conventional procedures to determine As. The method can be successfully applied to the separation and determination of As in water samples.



---

*Source: 912619-2014-01-16.xml*