# Overall Prevalence and Prevalence Compared among Psoriasis Treatments of Onychomycosis in Patients with Nail Psoriasis and Fungal Involvement

Authors: Leena Chularojanamontri; Penvadee Pattanaprichakul; Charussri Leeyaphan; Panittra Suphatsathienkul; Supisara Wongdama; Sumanas Bunyaratavej
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

Background. Whether nail psoriasis can increase the risk of onychomycosis is still being debated, and data relating to the prevalence of onychomycosis among psoriasis patients receiving different treatments is limited. Objectives. To investigate the overall prevalence and prevalence compared among psoriasis treatments of onychomycosis in patients with nail psoriasis and fungal involvement. Methods. A prospective study of three groups of nail psoriasis being treated with only topical medication, methotrexate, or biologics (25 patients per group, 150 nails) was conducted at Siriraj Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand) during November 2018 to September 2020. Demographic data, psoriasis severity, and nail psoriasis severity were recorded. The nail most severely affected with psoriasis on each hand was selected for mycological testing. Potassium hydroxide, periodic acid-Schiff stain, and fungal culture were performed. Results. The prevalence of onychomycosis in nail psoriasis was 35.3%. Among the treatment groups, the prevalence of onychomycosis was significantly higher in the methotrexate group than in the topical treatment and biologic treatment groups (p=0.014). Candida spp. was the main causative organism, followed by Trichophyton rubrum. Thumb was most commonly affected (59.3%). The most common abnormality of the nail matrix and the nail bed was pitted nail (71.3%) and onycholysis (91.3%), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed diabetes, wet-work exposure, and methotrexate treatment to be predictors of onychomycosis. Conclusions. Several factors, including psoriasis treatment, were shown to increase the risk of onychomycosis in nail psoriasis. Further research is needed to determine whether biologic agents, especially interleukin-17 inhibitors, can increase risk of onychomycosis and Candida infection/colonization of the nails.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Psoriasis is a multifactorial chronic disorder that has an etiopathogenesis that derives from the alteration of signaling pathways, which leads to a defect in the functional and structural properties of the skin [1]. It can cause nail pathology on both the hands and feet. The reported prevalence of nail involvement in patients with psoriasis varied considerably from 15% to 86% [2, 3]. The presence of nail involvement was reported to be a predictor of psoriatic arthritis, and it was also found that nail involvement may occur a few years before the development of joint disease [4]. Psoriasis can affect the nail matrix and nail bed resulting in several clinical presentations, including pitting, crumbling, onycholysis, and subungual hyperkeratosis [5].Onychomycosis is a fungal nail infection that is caused by dermatophytes, yeasts, and filamentous fungi. It is a common nail disease that accounts for 50% of nail disorders. Its prevalence in the general population and in patients with psoriasis can reach up to 30% and 56%, respectively [5, 6]. Clinical features of nail psoriasis and onychomycosis may overlap, and pathologies of both diseases may occur in the same patient. Several factors, including nail pathologies, patient behavior, immune status, and treatments for psoriasis, may contribute to the development of onychomycosis in nail psoriasis.Topical treatments, such as steroids, vitamin D3 analogs, tazarotene, trifarotene, topical calcineurin inhibitors, and 5-fluorouracil, can be used to treat nail psoriasis [7–9]. For patients with severe skin involvement and nail psoriasis, conventional systemic treatments (ciclosporin, methotrexate, and acitretin), small molecule drugs, and biologics are recommended. Due to their immunosuppressive properties, ciclosporin, methotrexate, and biologics may aggravate onychomycosis in nail psoriasis [3]. On the other hand, there is evidence that vitamin A and its active metabolite, all-transretinoic acid, exert host-protective effects in infections and direct fungistatic effect against Candida albicans [9–11]. Recently, small molecule drugs, such as apremilast and tofacitinib, have been shown to be effective for treating nail psoriasis [3, 12].Although several studies have investigated the prevalence of onychomycosis in patients with nail psoriasis, few studies have addressed its prevalence among patients receiving different treatments for psoriasis. Among those studies, a cross-sectional study reported a prevalence of onychomycosis of 34.8% (8/23) among patients not being treated with immunosuppressive agents, and yeasts, and filamentous fungi were the predominant pathogens [13]. Other studies reported that factors affecting the immune status, including diabetes, administration of topical corticosteroids, and systemic treatments for psoriasis, were risk factors for onychomycosis in patients with psoriasis [6, 14]. A randomized prospective open-label study reported that the risk of onychomycosis in psoriasis patients receiving treatment with an antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) was 20.3% compared to 13.9% in patients that did not receive any biological agents [15]. Moreover and importantly, published data relating to the prevalence of onychomycosis among patients receiving anti-interleukin- (IL-) 17, in which mucocutaneous candidiasis is a side effect of concern, is comparatively scarce [16].Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the overall prevalence and prevalence of onychomycosis among different treatments for psoriasis, including topical medication, methotrexate, or biologic therapy in patients with nail psoriasis. Our secondary objective was to identify significant risk factors for developing onychomycosis in this patient population.


## 2. Materials and Methods

This prospective study was conducted at the Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand during November 2018 to September 2020. The inclusion criteria were psoriasis patients with fingernail pathologies aged 18 years or older who attended the outpatient dermatology clinic at our center and who were being treated with only topical treatment, methotrexate, or biologic agents for at least four weeks. The exclusion criteria were (i) patients with a history of receiving any topical or systemic antifungal agents during the 12-week period prior to the start of this study, (ii) patients taking other immunosuppressant drugs, (iii) pregnant or lactating patients, and/or (iv) patients with other nail diseases. All patients who voluntarily agreed to participate in this study provided written informed consent. The protocol for this study was approved by the Siriraj Institutional Review Board (SIRB) (COA no. Si.844/2018).Demographic and clinical data, including gender, age, body mass index (BMI), duration of psoriasis, underlying diseases, psoriasis type, having or not having psoriatic arthritis, occupation, dominant hand side, and handwashing frequency, were recorded. Current psoriasis severity was assessed using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). The most severely affected fingernail of each hand was assessed using the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) and the Nijmegen-Nail Psoriasis Activity Index tool (N-NAIL) [16, 17]. For NAPSI, the nail was divided into four quadrants, after which each quadrant was evaluated for the presence or absence of any of eight parameters indicating nail bed and/or nail matrix pathologies. The NAPSI score for one fingernail ranged from 0 to 8 [16]. For N-NAIL, the five evaluated parameters include onycholysis/oil drop, pitting, crumbling, Beau lines, and subungual hyperkeratosis. A score of 0 indicates no nail involvement, whereas a score of 3 represents maximum severity for each parameter for a total possible score of 15 for each fingernail [17]. The skin around each fingernail was evaluated for paronychia, and each nail was evaluated, as follows: grade 1 = redness and swelling of the nail folds; grade 2 = pronounced redness and swelling of the nail folds; grade 3 = redness and swelling of the nail folds with no cuticle; grade 4 = redness and swelling of the nail folds, no cuticle, and tenderness and pain; and grade 5 = grade 4 plus acute paronychia on top of chronic paronychia [18].Specimens obtained from the distal part of the most severely affected psoriatic nail from each hand were tested for onychomycosis using potassium hydroxide (KOH), nail clipping for periodic acid-Schiff stain (PAS) technique, and fungal culture on Sabouraud dextrose agar and chloramphenicol media with and without cycloheximide (HiMedia Laboratories, Mumbai, India). Specimen collection and interpretation of KOH examination, PAS stain, and fungal cultures were performed by experienced technicians and one dermatopathologist. Cultures were incubated at 30°C and examined weekly up to 4 weeks. Chromogenic Candida Agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) was used to identifyC. tropicalis, C. krusei, C. albicans, and C. dubliniensis on the basis of the morphology and color of the colonies [19]. Blue and brown/pink colonies indicate C. tropicalis and C. krusei, respectively. Green colonies indicate C. albicans or C dubliniensis. The ability to grow at 42°C differentiates C. albicans (growth) from C. dubliniensis (no growth) [20]. Other Candida species that developed natural, mauve, or rose colors would be referred to Candida spp. in this study.Specimens were collected from the nail bed as proximally to the cuticle as possible using a scalpel blade. Onychomycosis was diagnosed if (i) culture was positive for pathologic fungi whether direct microscopy (KOH and PAS) was positive or negative or if (ii) culture was negative, but PAS stain revealed pathological forms of fungal infection whether direct KOH examination was positive or negative. Fungal colonization of the nail was diagnosed if culture was positive forCandida species, but direct microscopy was negative. If the results were negative for all three techniques (KOH, PAS, culture), negative pathogen would be diagnosed [21]. Patients with a diagnosis of onychomycosis were defined as patients who had onychomycosis of the right and/or left hand. KOH examination and culture were also performed at the proximal nail fold. Candida infection of the nail fold was diagnosed if there was at least grade one of paronychial involvement and positive result for both direct microscopy (KOH) and culture. Candida infection in the oral cavity was also recorded. Oral candidiasis was diagnosed if both KOH and culture showed a positive result for Candida infection.


### 2.1. Sample Size Calculation and Statistical Analysis

The sample size for each group was calculated usingλ2. Previous studies reported the prevalence of onychomycosis in psoriasis patients treated with topical medication, methotrexate, and biologic agents to be 20%, 50%, and 13%, respectively [14, 15, 21]. Using a 2-sided type I error of 0.05 and 80% power, a sample of 25 patients per group was required (75 patients in total).Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Data are described as mean plus/minus standard deviation (SD) for continuous data with normal distribution and as median and interquartile range (IQR) for nonnormally distributed continuous data. Categorical data are described as number and percentage. The results of univariate analysis and multivariate analysis are shown as odds ratio and adjusted odds ratio with their 95% confidence intervals, respectively. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 18.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis, and ap value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.


## 2.1. Sample Size Calculation and Statistical Analysis

The sample size for each group was calculated usingλ2. Previous studies reported the prevalence of onychomycosis in psoriasis patients treated with topical medication, methotrexate, and biologic agents to be 20%, 50%, and 13%, respectively [14, 15, 21]. Using a 2-sided type I error of 0.05 and 80% power, a sample of 25 patients per group was required (75 patients in total).Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Data are described as mean plus/minus standard deviation (SD) for continuous data with normal distribution and as median and interquartile range (IQR) for nonnormally distributed continuous data. Categorical data are described as number and percentage. The results of univariate analysis and multivariate analysis are shown as odds ratio and adjusted odds ratio with their 95% confidence intervals, respectively. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 18.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis, and ap value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.


## 3. Results

Among the 75 enrolled patients, the gender distribution was almost equal, and the mean age was46.8±15.3 years. The most common underlying disease was dyslipidemia (24.0%), followed by hypertension (22.7%), diabetes mellitus (18.7%), metabolic syndrome (13.3%), and obesity (12.0%). Table 1 shows the demographic and clinical characteristics of the included patients. Most patients had psoriasis without psoriatic arthritis (82.7%). Forty patients (53.3%) had an occupation that did not expose the patient to an increased risk of hand exposure to water. The median handwashing frequency of patients was 6 times/day, with a minimum of 2 times/day and a maximum of 20 times/day. Patterns of nail involvement and nail pathology were similar between the right hand and the left hand. Thirteen patients (17.3%) had oral candidiasis. We also found significant correlation between oral candidiasis and Candida infection of the nails (p=0.015, data not shown).Table 1
Demographic and clinical characteristics of nail psoriasis patients with onychomycosis.
Characteristics (N=75)ValuesGender,n (%)Female38 (50.7%)Male37 (49.3%)Age (years),mean±SD46.8±15.3Body mass index (kg/m2), mean±SD25.0±5.0Duration of psoriasis (years), median (IQR)11.0 (7.0, 20.0)Psoriasis types,n (%)Plaque64 (85.3%)Guttate7 (9.3%)Erythrodermic3 (4.0%)Pustular1 (1.3%)Psoriatic arthritis,n (%)13 (17.3%)Occupation,n (%)No increased risk of hand exposure to water†40 (53.3%)Increased risk of hand exposure to water‡35 (46.7%)Patient right-handed,n (%)68 (90.7%)Patient left-handed,n (%)7 (9.3%)Handwashing frequency (times/day), median (IQR)6.0 (4.0, 10.0)Current psoriasis severityPsoriasis Area and Severity Index score, median (IQR)5.0 (3.2, 10.2)Characteristics of fingernail pathologies (N=150)ValuesNail severityNail Psoriasis Severity Index score (0-8), median (IQR)4.0 (2.0, 4.0)Nijmegen-Nail Psoriasis Activity Index tool (0-15), median (IQR)4.0 (3.0, 5.0)Most severely affected fingernail,n (%)Thumb89 (59.3%)Index finger22 (14.7%)Middle finger16 (10.7%)Ring finger13 (8.7%)Little finger10 (6.7%)Nail matrix pathology,n (%)Pitting107 (71.3%)Leukonychia69 (46.0%)Crumbling55 (36.7%)Red spots lunula2 (1.3%)Nail bed pathology,n (%)Onycholysis137 (91.3%)Subungual hyperkeratosis53 (35.3%)Oil drop30 (20.0%)Splinter hemorrhage29 (19.3%)Beau lines,n (%)19 (12.7%)Paronychial involvement,n (%)73 (48.7%)†Driver, lawyer, merchant, collegian, teacher, or retired. ‡Housekeeper, farmer, fisherman, mechanic, builder, or barber. Abbreviations: SD: standard deviation; IQR: interquartile range.Of 150 fingernails (1 from each hand of each of 75 patients), the thumb was the most severely affected fingernail on both hands. Pitted nail and onycholysis were the most common abnormalities of the nail matrix and nail bed, respectively. Seventy-three fingernails had paronychial involvement with 71.2%, 26.0%, and 2.7% of grades 1, 2, and 3 paronychial involvement, respectively. Fifty-three (35.3%) fingernails and 34 (22.7%) fingernails had onychomycosis andCandida colonization, respectively (Table 2). The most common organism causing onychomycosis was Candida spp., followed by Trichophyton rubrum. Candida infection of the nail fold was found in 13 (17.8%) of the 73 fingernails with paronychial involvement. The photos of clinical findings of nail psoriasis with fungal infection and macro and micromorphology of the fungal isolates are shown as Figure 1.Table 2
Results of potassium hydroxide (KOH), periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) stain, and culture techniques.
Specimens collected from distal part of fingernails (N=150)Direct microscopyCultureInterpretationn(%)PathogenKOH testing¶PAS stain§——No growthNo pathogen62 (41.3%)+—No growthDiscordant results1 (0.7%)——CandidaColonization34 (22.7%)(i)Candida spp. (n=24)(ii) C. albicans (n=5)(iii) C. krusei (n=5)—+No growth7 (4.7%)+++—Onychomycosis46 (30.7%)Candida spp. (n=25)C. albicans (n=15)C. krusei (n=3)C. dubliniensis (n=2)T. rubrum (n=1)—+Pathologic fungi++Specimens collected from proximal part of fingernails that had at least grade 1 of paronychial involvement (N=73)KOH testing¶CultureInterpretationn(%)Pathogen——No pathogen52 (71.2%)Pseudohyphae with budding yeastCandidaCandida infection at the nail fold13 (17.8%)Candida spp. (n=9)C. albicans (n=2)C. krusei (n=1)C. dubliniensis (n=1)¶KOH: + indicates pseudohyphae with budding yeast or septate hyphae. §PAS: + indicates the presence of septate hyphae invading the nail plate or thicker tortuous wall hyphae or pseudohyphae with budding yeast.Figure 1
Representative pictures of clinical findings of psoriatic nail with fungal infection. Culture and microscopic identification from specimens collected from the distal part of psoriatic nail were also demonstrated. The fungi were inoculated onto the Chromogenic Candida Agar (a–d) and the Sabouraud dextrose agar with chloramphenicol (e) and inoculated at 30°C for 4 weeks. (a)Candida spp., (b) C. albicans, (c) C. krusei, (d) C. dubliniensis, and (e) Trichophyton rubrum.Univariate analysis showed concomitant diabetes, occupation that might increase the risk of hand exposure to water, and methotrexate to be significant risk factors associated with onychomycosis (Table3), and all three of those factors remained statistically significant in multivariate analysis. When we excluded patients with diabetes and reanalyzed our data, wet-work exposure and methotrexate were significant risk factors for the development of onychomycosis in univariate analysis (p=0.002, p=0.028), and wet-work exposure remained as the only risk factor independently associated with onychomycosis in multivariate analysis (p=0.007). Table 4 shows that the prevalence of onychomycosis was highest in the methotrexate group (68% in methotrexate treatment, 40% in topical treatment, and 28% in biologic treatment). However, the number of patients with diabetes and wet-work exposure was higher in the methotrexate group than in the other two groups. The risk of Candida colonization of the nail did not increase significantly in the biologic treatment group even though the main biologics used were interleukin-17 inhibitors.Table 3
Analysis for risk factors independently associated with onychomycosis in patients with nail psoriasis.
Univariate analysisMultivariate analysisCrude odds ratio (95% confidence interval)p valueAdjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval)p valueMale gender0.68 (0.27-1.70)0.411Concomitant diabetes mellitus6.06 (1.53-24.02)0.0107.04 (1.44-34.50)0.016Duration of psoriasis ≥10 years0.99 (0.37-2.70)0.989Handwashingfrequency≥6 times/day1.83 (0.73-4.58)0.200Occupation that increased the risk of hand exposure to water5.05 (1.89-13.52)0.0014.12 (1.36-12.51)0.012NailPsoriasisSeverityIndexscore≥41.30 (0.52-3.24)0.570Nijmegen−NailPsoriasisActivityIndexscore≥41.70 (0.65-4.46)0.281Topical treatment: methotrexate3.19 (1.00-10.17)0.0502.12 (0.55-8.16)0.275Biologic#0.58 (0.18-1.91)0.3720.46 (0.12-1.86)0.277Biologic treatment#: topical1.71 (0.53-5.60)0.3722.16 (0.54-8.65)0.277Methotrexate5.46 (1.63-18.36)0.0064.57 (1.11-18.93)0.036Pitted nails1.51 (0.54-4.23)0.434Leukonychia1.14 (0.46-2.83)0.785Crumbling1.69 (0.65-4.41)0.282Onycholysis0.46 (0.10-2.07)0.311Subungual hyperkeratosis1.09 (0.43-2.77)0.850Paronychial involvement0.90 (0.36-2.25)0.817Candida infection in the oral cavity3.33 (0.92-12.01)0.0662.82 (0.59-13.39)0.192Variables with ap value < 0.20 in univariate analysis were included in multivariate analysis. A p value < 0.05 in multivariate analysis was considered statistically significant. #Interleukin- (IL-) 17 inhibitors, antitumor necrosis factor, and anti-IL 12/23 were used in 20, 4, and 1 patient, respectively.Table 4
Characteristics of nail psoriasis patients compared among psoriasis treatment regimens.
Number of patients (N=75)CharacteristicsTopical treatment (n=25)Methotrexate (n=25)Biologic agents#(n=25)pvalueGender,n (%)Female9 (36.0%)13 (52.0%)16 (64.0%)Male16 (64.0%)12 (48.0%)9 (36.0%)Age (years),mean±SD48.1±17.247.8±11.344.4±16.80.403Body mass index (kg/m2), mean±SD23.6±4.025.6±5.425.9±5.20.042Concomitant diabetes mellitus,n (%)2 (8.0%)7 (28.0%)5 (20.0%)0.226Occupation,n (%)Increased risk of hand exposure to water9 (36.0%)17 (68.0%)9 (36.0%)0.032Nail severity, median (IQR)Nail Psoriasis Severity Index score3.0 (2.0, 4.0)3.0 (2.0, 4.0)4.0 (2.0, 4.0)0.979Nijmegen-Nail Psoriasis Activity Index score4.0 (3.0, 5.0)4.0 (3.0, 5.0)4.0 (3.0, 5.0)0.333Patients with diagnosis of onychomycosisNo15 (60.0%)8 (32.0%)18 (72.0%)0.014Yes (right or left hand)10 (40.0%)17 (68.0%)7 (28.0%)Number of fingernails (N=150)CharacteristicsTopical treatment (n=50)Methotrexate (n=50)Biologic agents#(n=50)pvalueCandida infection of the nails16 (32.0%)25 (50.0%)9 (18.0%)0.030Candida colonization of the nails11 (22.0%)8 (16.0%)15 (30.0%)0.245Candida infection of the nail folds7 (14.0%)8 (16.0%)6 (12.0%)0.847Candida infection of the nails and nail folds7 (14.0%)7 (14.0%)6 (12.0%)1.000#Interleukin- (IL-) 17 inhibitors, antitumor necrosis factor, and anti-IL 12/23 were used in 20, 4, and 1 patient, respectively. A p value < 0.05 indicates statistical significance. Abbreviations: SD: standard deviation; IQR: interquartile range.


## 4. Discussion

A systematic review in 2014 showed an increased prevalence of onychomycosis in psoriatic patients (18%) compared to the prevalence in the general population (9.1%); however, the high heterogeneity among the 10 included studies limits the reliability of their findings [22]. We reviewed the literature in the PubMed database using the keywords “prevalence,” “onychomycosis,” “psoriasis,” and “treatment.” Thirty studies were included and summarized, as shown in Table 5 [2, 6, 13–15, 21, 23–46]. It was shown that the prevalence of onychomycosis in psoriatic nails in Asian countries ranged from 20.3% (Kuwait) to 47.9% (India) compared to the prevalence of 18.0% (Belgium, Poland) to 62.0% (Bulgaria) in European countries [2, 6, 13–15, 23, 25, 27–33, 35, 37, 40, 41, 44–46]. The prevalence of onychomycosis in controls with clinical abnormality in Asian countries ranged from 4% (Pakistan) to 40.6% (Turkey) compared to the prevalence of 22.4% (Poland) to 51.3% (Italy) in European countries [2, 14, 15, 32, 33, 35, 37, 44–46]. The first study of the prevalence of onychomycosis in psoriasis patients at our center was published in 2018, and that study found a prevalence of 32.3% [23]. The prevalence in this study was 35.3% (53/150), which is close to, but higher than that from the previous study. It seemed that the prevalence of onychomycosis in psoriatic patients in the present study was in a range of the reported prevalence of onychomycosis in controls with clinical nail abnormality in Asian countries [15, 35, 45].Table 5
Published literature in the PubMed database relating to the prevalence of onychomycosis in nail psoriasis.
Authors (year, country)Patients : ControlsFungal testsPrevalence of onychomycosis (%)Prevalence of onychomycosis among different treatments of psoriasis (%)Organisms from psoriatic nails (%)OverallPsoriasis patientsControlsTopicalSystemicBiologicsNo clinicalClinically abnormalNo clinicalClinically abnormalToenails1. Gupta et al. (1997, Canada and USA)561 : 922KOH+C/S15.312.7 (38/298)27 (71/263)6.9 (54/776)43.8 (64/146)———(i) DMPs 84.9(ii) Moulds 9.4(iii) Yeasts 5.72. Hamnerius et al. (2004, Sweden)239 : 245KOH+C/S3.54.6 (11/239)—2.4 (6/245)—————3. Zawirska et al. (2006, Poland)70 : 60KOH+C/S911.4 (8/70)—3.3 (2/60)—————4. Piérard-Franchimont et al. (2006, Belgium)233 : 0C/S+PAS18.0—18.0 (42/233)—————(i) DMPs 54.3(ii) Yeasts 37.1(iii) Moulds 8.65. Leibovici et al. (2008, Israel)113 : 102KOH+C/S38.6—47.6 (54/113)28.4 (29/102)————(i) DMPs 77.8(ii) Yeasts 11.1(iii) Moulds 11.16. Altunay et al. (2009, Turkey)60 : 60KOH+C/S8.38.3 (5/60)8.3 (5/60)———(i) DMPs 1007. Vender et al. (2016, Canada)12 : 0KOH+C/S25—25 (3/12)—————(i) Moulds 33.3(ii) No growth 66.7Toenails and fingernails8. Staberg et al. (1983, Denmark)78 : 41KOH+C/S25.226.9 (10/39)30.8 (12/39)19.5 (8/41)————(i) DMPs 47.6(ii) Yeasts 47.6(iii) Moulds 4.89. Szepes (1986, Hungary)137 : 341C/S64.463.1 (83/137)66.0 (225/341)———(i) Moulds 50.0(ii) Yeasts 37.1(iii) DMPs 12.910. Stander et al. (2001, Germany)250 : 102KOH+C/S27.330.4 (76/250)19.6 (20/102)———(i) DMPs 28.9(ii) Yeasts 62.2(iii) Moulds 7.911. Salomon et al. (2003, Poland)106 : 0KOH+C/S13.8Not tested (n=23)18 (15/83)—————(i) Moulds 37.5(ii) DMPs 31.3(iii) Yeasts 31.312. Larsen et al. (2003, Denmark)79 : 142KOH+C/S15.8Not tested (n=14)26.2 (17/65)Not tested (n=89)34.0 (18/53)———(i) Yeasts 45.5(ii) DMPs 36.4(iii) Moulds 18.213. Kacar et al. (2006, Turkey)168 : 164KOH+C/S10.5Not tested (n=91)28.6 (22/77)Not tested (n=132)40.6 (13/32)———(i) DMPs 36.4(ii) Yeasts 13.6(iii) Moulds 9.1(iv) No growth 40.914. Pawlaczyck et al. (2007, Poland)481 : 3,986KOH+C/S36.36.0 (20/327)18.8 (29/154)—39.6 (1579/3986)———(i) DMPs 65.5(ii) Yeasts 27.6(iii) Moulds 6.915. Sánchez-Regaña et al. (2007, Spain)20 : 0KOH+C/S30—30 (6/20)—————(i) Yeasts 66.7(ii) Moulds 33.316. Shemer et al. (2009, Israel)312 : 0KOH+C/S34.3—34.3 (23/67)—————(i) DMPs 74.0(ii) Moulds 39.1(iii) Yeasts 30.417. Natarajan et al. (2010, India)72 : 0KOH+C/S+PAS31.9Not tested (n=24)47.9 (23/48)—————(i) Moulds 50(ii) Yeasts 5018. Kavaliauskiene et al. (2010, Lithuania)30 : 529KOH+C/S23.6—23.3 (7/30)—23.6 (125/529)———(i) DMPs 71.4(ii) Yeasts 28.619. Zisova et al. (2011, Bulgaria)228 : 0KOH+C/S62—62 (141/228)—————(i) DMPs 67(ii) Yeasts 24(iii) Moulds 620. Rizzo et al. (2013, Italy)31 : 274C/S+PAS37.7—41.9 (13/31)—37.2 (102/274)———(i) Yeasts 69.2(ii) DMPs 30.821. Al-Mutairi N et al. (2013, Kuwait)315 : 180KOH+C/S18.0—20.3 (64/315)—13.9 (25/180)13.9—Anti-TNF 20.3(i) IFX 33.0(ii) ETA 15.5(iii) ADA 13.3(i) DMPs 65.6(ii) Yeasts 28.1(iii) Moulds 6.322. Mendez-Tovar et al. (2015, Mexico)150 : 0KOH+C/S28Not tested (n=67)50.6 (42/83)——21.4MTX, CsA 31Anti-TNF 11.9(i) Yeasts 50(ii) DMPs 32(iii) Moulds 1823. Tsentemeidou et al. (2017, Greece)23 : 0KOH+C/S34.8—34.8 (8/23)——34.8——(i) Yeasts 37.5(ii) Moulds 37.5(iii) DMPs 12.524. Zander et al. (2017, Germany)2781 : 136,137Not specified6.47.8 (219/2781)6.4 (8678/136,137)————25. Romaszkiewicz et al. (2018, Poland)102 : 2335KOH+C/S22.4—23.5 (24/102)5 (5/100)22.4 (520/2325)25MTX 20.8CsA 12.5ACT 4.1Anti-TNF 37.5(i) Yeasts 50.0(ii) DMPs 29.2(iii) Moulds 20.826. Chaowattanapanit et al. (2018, Thailand)62 : 0C/S32.3—32.3 (20/62)—————(i) Yeasts 41.9(ii) Moulds 19.4(iii) No growth 35.527. Tabassum et al. (2019, Pakistan)159 : 318KOH+C/S14—34 (54/159)—4 (13/318)34——(i) Yeasts 37.0(ii) Moulds 35.2(iii) DMPs 7.428. Jendoubi et al. (2019, Tunisia)163 : 0KOH+C/S33.7Not tested (n=47)47.4 (55/116)—————Fingernail:Yeasts 100Toenail:DMPs 10029. Gallo et al. (2019, Italy)711 : 8670KOH+C/S51.1—49.1 (349/711)—51.3 (4397/8570)———(i) Yeasts 43.6(ii) DMPs 43.3(iii) Moulds 13.230. Alves et al. (2020, Brazil)38 : 0KOH+C/S+PAS57.9—57.9 (22/38)——33.0MTX 92.8ACT 33.3Anti-TNF 50Anti-IL17 0Anti-IL23 0(i) DMPs 56.3(ii) Yeasts 43.8Fingernails31. The present study75 : 0 (150 nails)KOH+C/S+PAS36—36 (54/150)——44.0MTX 68.0Anti-TNF 50Anti-IL17 25Anti-IL12/23 0(i) Yeasts 83.3(ii) DMPs 1.9(iii) No growth 14.8Abbreviations: KOH: potassium hydroxide examination; C/S: culture; PAS: Periodic-Schiff stain; MTX: methotrexate; ACT: acitretin; CsA: ciclosporin; anti-TNF: antitumor necrosis factor; IFX: infliximab; ETA: etanercept; ADA: adalimumab; IL: interleukin; DMPs: dermatophytes.Yeasts (Candida spp.) were more commonly identified in the present study, which is similar to several previous studies [2, 1314, 23, 24]. Chadeganipour et al. used molecular technique to identify Candida species in clinical samples of patients with psoriasis [47]. Molecular technique can provide 95% sensitivity and 100% specificity [48]. In that study, C. parapsilosis was the most prevalent species among Candida species of fingernail infection and none of Candida species were albicans. A lower number of clinical samples and different technique to identify Candida species in Chadeganipour’s study may explain the results different from our study [47].Our study showed diabetes, methotrexate treatment, and wet-work exposure to be significant risk factors associated with onychomycosis. Methotrexate was at greater risk of developing onychomycosis compared to biologic treatment. The pathogenesis of nail psoriasis may increase or decrease the risk of onychomycosis. Generally, rapid nail growth, increase in antimicrobial peptides, and compact orthokeratotic nail plate will decrease the risk of onychomycosis in nail psoriasis [5]. However, other factors that increase the risk of onychomycosis also play an important role. Methotrexate can increase the risk of onychomycosis by immunosuppressive effect and slow the rate of nail growth [6].Studies reporting the prevalence of onychomycosis in psoriasis patients who were on biologic treatment mainly included patients receiving anti-TNF treatment [14, 15, 21, 24]. Three out of four studies, including a randomized prospective study, showed a higher prevalence of onychomycosis in psoriatic patients treated with anti-TNF than in patients that received other types of treatments [14, 15, 21, 24]. There are some possible explanations why biologics did not increase the risk of onychomycosis in our study. First, the faster nail growth rate in psoriasis [49–51] acts as a protective factor against onychomycosis. Second, biologic treatment is more effective for treating nail psoriasis than methotrexate [52] because it reduces nail pathology and the opportunity of the fungi to invade the nail keratin. Third and last, the biologics most often used in our study were interleukin-17 inhibitors, which may have less immunosuppressive effect than anti-TNF.


### 4.1. Limitations

This study has some mentionable limitations. Even though we enrolled a sufficient number of patients to satisfy the minimum described by our sample size calculation, 75 patients represent a relatively small number of patients. Besides, only 20 patients were treated with interleukin-17 inhibitors, which could limit the generalizability of our results. Secondly, toenails were not included in this study since several other factors influence the risk of developing onychomycosis of the toenails compared to the fingernails. Thirdly, in cases of diagnostic discordance among the 3 diagnostic methods, a retest was not performed. Our rationale for this is that all three diagnostic methods were performed by experienced technicians and one expert dermatopathologist. Finally, molecular biology testing, which provides high sensitivity, high specificity, and accurate identification of fungal species, could not be performed in this study due to its relatively high cost. Alternatively, our laboratory used a culture-based method to identify fungal species. OnlyC. albicans, C. dubliniensis, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei could be identified. This is why we reported the other groups of Candida as Candida spp.


## 4.1. Limitations

This study has some mentionable limitations. Even though we enrolled a sufficient number of patients to satisfy the minimum described by our sample size calculation, 75 patients represent a relatively small number of patients. Besides, only 20 patients were treated with interleukin-17 inhibitors, which could limit the generalizability of our results. Secondly, toenails were not included in this study since several other factors influence the risk of developing onychomycosis of the toenails compared to the fingernails. Thirdly, in cases of diagnostic discordance among the 3 diagnostic methods, a retest was not performed. Our rationale for this is that all three diagnostic methods were performed by experienced technicians and one expert dermatopathologist. Finally, molecular biology testing, which provides high sensitivity, high specificity, and accurate identification of fungal species, could not be performed in this study due to its relatively high cost. Alternatively, our laboratory used a culture-based method to identify fungal species. OnlyC. albicans, C. dubliniensis, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei could be identified. This is why we reported the other groups of Candida as Candida spp.


## 5. Conclusions

The prevalence of onychomycosis in nail psoriasis in this study was 35.3%. Among the three different psoriasis treatment groups, the prevalence of onychomycosis was significantly higher in the methotrexate treatment group than in the topical treatment and biologic treatment groups. Several factors can affect the risk of onychomycosis, including occupation, psoriasis treatment, host status, and nail growth rate. Molecular identification would be the best method to elucidate the etiology and establish an epidemiological inference with previous findings in the literature.



---

*Source: 9113418-2021-12-13.xml*