# Helminth Parasites Alter Protection againstPlasmodium Infection

Authors: Víctor H. Salazar-Castañon; Martha Legorreta-Herrera; Miriam Rodriguez-Sosa
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

More than one-third of the world’s population is infected with one or more helminthic parasites. Helminth infections are prevalent throughout tropical and subtropical regions where malaria pathogens are transmitted. Malaria is the most widespread and deadliest parasitic disease. The severity of the disease is strongly related to parasite density and the host’s immune responses. Furthermore, coinfections between both parasites occur frequently. However, little is known regarding how concomitant infection with helminths andPlasmodium affects the host’s immune response. Helminthic infections are frequently massive, chronic, and strong inductors of a Th2-type response. This implies that infection by such parasites could alter the host’s susceptibility to subsequent infections by Plasmodium. There are a number of reports on the interactions between helminths and Plasmodium; in some, the burden of Plasmodium parasites increased, but others reported a reduction in the parasite. This review focuses on explaining many of these discrepancies regarding helminth-Plasmodium coinfections in terms of the effects that helminths have on the immune system. In particular, it focuses on helminth-induced immunosuppression and the effects of cytokines controlling polarization toward the Th1 or Th2 arms of the immune response.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Currently, it is estimated that approximately one-third of the almost three billion people who live on less than two US dollars per day are infected with one or more helminths [1]. Human infections with these organisms remain prevalent in countries where the malaria parasite is also endemic [2]. Consequently, coinfections with both parasites occur frequently [3, 4]. These interactions could have potential fitness implications for both the host (morbidity and/or mortality) and the parasite (transmission). Several studies have shown that the ability of a parasite to successfully establish an infection will depend on the initial immune response of the exposed host [5, 6]. When entering the host, a parasite will experience an “immune environment” potentially determined by both previous and current infections [7–9]. It is widely recognized that, in the presence of Th2 effector response, Th1 response is suppressed and vice versa [10]. Thus, Th2-type response evoked in response to helminth infection would in theory have the ability to suppress proinflammatory Th1 response that generates immunopathology inPlasmodium infection.Despite the fact that helminth parasites cause widespread, persistent human infection that results in a Th2 immune response, the influence of helminths on the duration of episodes of malaria in humans is not clear. The questions of how the coexistence of helminths andPlasmodium parasites within the same host might influence the immunological responses to each species and whether interactions affect resistance, susceptibility, and the clinical outcome of malaria has yet to be answered.In this review, we attempt to answer these questions and particularly address whether the preexistence of a Th2/T regulatory response induced by helminths could affect the immune response againstPlasmodium.Before analyzing the influence of helminths infection on malaria, we must first briefly outline the immune response toPlasmodium infection and later outline the immune response to helminths parasites, as this is important to subsequent analyses of how malaria can be modified by the helminths.


## 2.Plasmodium

Malaria is caused by protozoan parasites belonging to the genusPlasmodium; it is transmitted by femaleAnopheles mosquitoes.Plasmodium is still one of the most successful pathogens in the world and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in tropical countries. Five species ofPlasmodium (i.e.,P. falciparum,P. vivax,P. malariae,P. ovale, andP. knowlesi) are responsible for all human infections [11, 12].Plasmodium parasites have a complicated, multistage lifecycle involving anAnopheline mosquito vector and a vertebrate host. The parasite develops in two stages in its human host: in the liver (the exoerythrocytic stage) and in the blood (the intraerythrocytic stage). The most characteristic features of malaria in humans are a fever that occurs every 48 to 72 h depending on the species ofPlasmodium, chills, headache, and gastrointestinal symptoms. In a naive, untreated individual, these can rapidly escalate into cerebral malaria (CM), anemia, severe organ failure, and death [13].


### 2.1. Immune Response duringPlasmodium Infection

The immune response toPlasmodium is poorly understood; it depends on the parasite species and the specific stage within the host [12]. In addition, it is dichotomized into the preerythrocytic response, which is directed against the sporozoite and liver-stage parasites, and the blood stage response, which is directed against merozoites and intraerythrocytic parasites.Although animal models do not fully replicate human malaria, they are invaluable tools for elucidating immune processes that can cause pathology and death [14]. Several mouse strains have been used to study the immune response to different combinations ofPlasmodium species, such asP. berghei [15–20],P. yoelii [15, 21–24],P. chabaudi [25–30], andP. vinckei [31] (Table 1). These malarial models suggest that the efficiency of parasite control requires both a humoral and a cellular immune response, most likely in cooperation, although the importance of each is not entirely clear. For example, immunity to the sporozoite depends on antibodies to surface proteins, such as CSP-2 [32, 33] and liver-stage antigen (LSA-1) [34]; these antigens induce the production of antibodies that neutralize or block the invasion of hepatocytes [35]. Once sporozoites have entered the hepatocyte, the parasite clearance in mice requires CD8+ T cells [36], natural killer cells (NK), and NKT and γ
δ T cells that produce IFN-γ to eliminate infected hepatocytes [35]. When the parasite invades red blood cells (RBC), it dramatically alters the physiological and biochemical processes of its host cell. Parasite-infected RBCs (pRBC) express parasite-encoded molecules on their surface that affects the RBCs’ mobility and trafficking within the body. The parasite biomass increases very rapidly and activates innate immune mechanisms, including NK cells and γ
δ T cells [13].Table 1
Mouse models of malaria infection. ECM: experimental cerebral malaria, PvAS:P. vinckei petteri arteether sensitive, PvAR: P. vinckei arteether resistant, Py: P. yoelii, and KO: knockout.
Species
Subspecies: clone
Mouse strain and anemia
Mouse strain and CM
Useful in research
Ref.
P. berghei
P. berghei ANKA
C57BL/6: lethalCD-1: lethalC57BL/6J: non-lethalBALB/c: lethal
C57BL/6: susceptibleCBA: susceptibleBALB/c: resistant
Used as a model of ECM; there is genetic variation in the development of ECM between inbred strains
[15–17]
P. berghei K173
C57BL/6: lethal
Used to study pathogenesis; differs in some aspects of pathogenesis, indicating the influence of parasite genetic variation
[18]
P. berghei NK65
C57BL/6: lethal
Is a murine noncerebral malaria strain; induces a progressive increase in parasitemia, intense hepatic inflammation, and death
[19]
P. berghei  XAT
Spontaneously cleared in immune competent mice
Irradiation-induced attenuated variant from lethal strainPb NK65; comparison of immune responses induced by these lethal and attenuated parasites lead us to elucidate the mechanisms of protective immunity and pathogenesis
[20]
P. yoelii
P. yoelii 17 NXL
BALB/c: non-lethal
Most strains resistant
Used to study immune mechanisms and pathogenesis;Py; line A1 is a mild line which is restricted to reticulocytes
[15]
P. yoelii 17XL
BALB/c: lethalC57BL/6: lethal
Most strainssusceptible
Used to identify vaccine-induced immune response
[21, 22]
P. yoeliiYM
CBA: lethal
Py-YM is virulent infection which multiplies in both immature and mature erythrocytes
[23]
P. yoeliiYA
CBA: non-lethal
YM parasites are responsible for normocyte invasion, increased virulence compared to mild linePy YA parasites; lines YM and A/C differed additionally in enzyme and drug-sensitivity markers
[24]
P. chabaudi
P. chabaudi AS
A/J: lethalC57BL/6: non-lethalBALB/c: non-lethal
C57BL/6 IL-10KO:susceptible
Used to study immune mechanisms and immunoregulation by cytokines, to identify susceptibility loci, and to study the immune basis of pathology
[25–28]
P. chabaudi AJ
BALB/c: non-lethal
Used to study experimental vaccines and immunological processes that control hyperparasitaemia
[25, 27]
P. chabaudi
adami DS
C3H:  lethalC57BL/6: non-lethal
Is fast-growing and high pathogenicity, induces more anemia, weight loss, and is less infective to mosquitoes than DK strain
[29, 30]
P. chabaudi
adami DK
BALB/c: non-lethalC3H: non-lethal
Is slower growing and less pathogenic and more selective in its invasion of subset of RBCs than DK
[29, 30]
P. vinckei
P. vinckei vinckei
BALB/c: lethalAKR: lethal
Used to study pathogenesis and for chemotherapy studies; it causes aggressive, overwhelming hyperparasitaemia
[31]
P. vinckei petteri
AKR: lethal (PvAS)AKR: non-lethal (PvAR)
Used for drug screening and immunological studies
[31]NK cells play an important role in restricting parasite replication. The absence of NK cells is associated with low IFN-γ serum levels and increased parasitemia in mice infected withP. chabaudi [37]. Likewise, the absence of IFN-γ reduces the ability of mice to control and eliminate parasites, eventually resulting in the death of the animals [38, 39]. Interestingly, macrophages (Mφ), but not IFN-γ, play a major role in the control of early peaks in lethal infections withP. yoelii [40]. In addition, IFN-γ produced by CD4+ T cells plays a pivotal role in protective immunity against non-lethal strains ofPlasmodium [41, 42]. In contrast, the infection withP. berghei ANKA induces high levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α which are associated with cerebral malaria [43]. However, the peak of parasitemia in athymic mice tends to be similar to the peak in WT mice. These results suggest that extrathymic T cells are the major lymphocyte subset associated with protection against malaria [44].In a resistant strain of mice, the presence of the parasite induces the production of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-γ. Furthermore, IL-12 is also necessary for elimination ofP. chabaudi AS [45],P. berghei XAT [20], andP. yoelii XNL [46].Besides, the inflammatory cytokine MIF (macrophage migration inhibitory factor) induces pathogenesis and susceptibility on BALB/c mice infected withP. chabaudi, high serum levels of MIF correlated with severity of disease [47]. In addition, infection of MIF knockout mice withP. chabaudi increases survival [48].CD4+ T cells, together with B cells, are crucial to develop efficient protection in murine experimental models [49, 50]. Whereas IFN-γ, produced by TCD4+, activates Mφ-mediated responses [51], the antibodies produced by B cells inhibit invasion of RBCs by the parasites [52], opsonize parasitized RBCs, block pRBC adhesion to the vascular endothelium, and neutralize parasite toxins [35]. In addition, mice rendered B cell deficient by treatment with anti-μ antibodies or B cell knockout mice (μMT) are unable to clear the erythrocytic infection ofP. chabaudi [50, 53, 54]. Specifically, the early acute infection is controlled to some extent, giving rise to chronic relapsing parasitemia that cannot be cleared. Finally, parasitemia can be reduced by adoptive transfer of B cells [50].Antibodies also induce pathology due to parasite antigens that are freed and adhere to healthy erythrocytes; this generates anemia or autoimmune reactions that cause damage to the kidneys and other tissues [55–58]. For example, pathogenesis of malaria nephropathy is linked to subendothelial deposits of immune complexes containing IgG and IgM [59, 60]. The antibodies involved in the elimination of the parasite mainly belong to cytophilic subclasses (IgG1 and IgG3) [50, 61]. In addition, high levels of immunoglobulin E (IgE) correlate with protection against severe malaria [62–64].Interestingly, after the peak of parasitemia, cellular immune responses should switch from Th1- to Th2-type response inP. chabaudi infected mice [65], because the malaria pathogenesis is caused by inappropriate or excessive inflammatory responses to eliminate the parasite [43, 66].Interestingly,Plasmodium can modulate the response of antigen presenting cells, such as Mφ and dendritic cells (DC), which leads to suppression of the immune response [67]. In the infection withP. yoelii YM, the DC function is affected by the presence of TNF-α [68]. Wykes et al. suggested that damage to the activity of DCs is due to a virulence factor that is present in certain parasite strains because, when DCs were transferred from mice infected with a “nonlethal” strain to mice infected with a “lethal” parasite strain, the mice were protected [46].The regulatory T cells are extremely important to control the inflammatory process in malaria, the number of CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Treg) increases in mice infected withP. yoelii [69] orP. berghei [70]. In addition, mice infected with the lethalP. yoelii XL17 show higher levels of IL-10 and TGF-β compared to mice infected with the nonlethal strainP. yoelii XNL, at early time points during infection [71]. Furthermore, the suppression of T cells induces lethality in mice infected withP. yoelii, while neutralization of TGF-β and IL-10 decreases parasitemia and prolongs the survival of infected mice [71, 72]. Accordingly, Couper et al. reported that the main sources of IL-10 in lethal infection withP. yoelii are Treg cells [73]. Finally, the ablation of Treg cells fromP. yoelii-infected DEREG-BALB/c mice significantly increases T cell activation and decreases parasitemia [74]. In addition, in mice infected with nonlethal strains ofP. yoelii, the presence of cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β during the chronic phase of infection was detected [71]. Thus, these data together suggest that the outcome of malaria infection could be determined by the balance of proinflammatory and regulatory immune responses, which could inhibit pathology (Figure 1).Figure 1
Representation of the course ofPlasmodium chabaudi infection. Early infection with the erythrocytic stage is characterized by the production of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-12 and TNF-α, and a pronounced IFN-γ response. In addition, NO produced by Mφ helped control parasitemia (1). IFN-γ activates Mφ-mediated responses, in particular phagocytosis and elimination of pRBC (2). CD4+ T cells, together with B cells, are crucial for developing efficient protection (3). Th1 production is downregulated later by an increased Th2-type immune response following primary infection (4). In a later stage of infection, after the peak parasitemia has been reached, CD4 T cells switch from a Th1 to a Th2 cytokine profile (5). This switch helps B cells produce antibodies (6). The antibodies inhibit the invasion of RBCs by the parasites, opsonize parasitized RBCs, or block pRBC adhesion to the vascular endothelium (7, 8). The slow late switch from noncytophilic (IgM and IgG2a) (7) to cytophilic subclasses (i.e., IgG1 and IgG3) (8) is involved in parasite elimination (9). However, IgE correlates with protection against severe malaria. Figure modified from Langhorne et al. 2004 [75] and Stevenson and Urban 2006 [67].


## 2.1. Immune Response duringPlasmodium Infection

The immune response toPlasmodium is poorly understood; it depends on the parasite species and the specific stage within the host [12]. In addition, it is dichotomized into the preerythrocytic response, which is directed against the sporozoite and liver-stage parasites, and the blood stage response, which is directed against merozoites and intraerythrocytic parasites.Although animal models do not fully replicate human malaria, they are invaluable tools for elucidating immune processes that can cause pathology and death [14]. Several mouse strains have been used to study the immune response to different combinations ofPlasmodium species, such asP. berghei [15–20],P. yoelii [15, 21–24],P. chabaudi [25–30], andP. vinckei [31] (Table 1). These malarial models suggest that the efficiency of parasite control requires both a humoral and a cellular immune response, most likely in cooperation, although the importance of each is not entirely clear. For example, immunity to the sporozoite depends on antibodies to surface proteins, such as CSP-2 [32, 33] and liver-stage antigen (LSA-1) [34]; these antigens induce the production of antibodies that neutralize or block the invasion of hepatocytes [35]. Once sporozoites have entered the hepatocyte, the parasite clearance in mice requires CD8+ T cells [36], natural killer cells (NK), and NKT and γ
δ T cells that produce IFN-γ to eliminate infected hepatocytes [35]. When the parasite invades red blood cells (RBC), it dramatically alters the physiological and biochemical processes of its host cell. Parasite-infected RBCs (pRBC) express parasite-encoded molecules on their surface that affects the RBCs’ mobility and trafficking within the body. The parasite biomass increases very rapidly and activates innate immune mechanisms, including NK cells and γ
δ T cells [13].Table 1
Mouse models of malaria infection. ECM: experimental cerebral malaria, PvAS:P. vinckei petteri arteether sensitive, PvAR: P. vinckei arteether resistant, Py: P. yoelii, and KO: knockout.
Species
Subspecies: clone
Mouse strain and anemia
Mouse strain and CM
Useful in research
Ref.
P. berghei
P. berghei ANKA
C57BL/6: lethalCD-1: lethalC57BL/6J: non-lethalBALB/c: lethal
C57BL/6: susceptibleCBA: susceptibleBALB/c: resistant
Used as a model of ECM; there is genetic variation in the development of ECM between inbred strains
[15–17]
P. berghei K173
C57BL/6: lethal
Used to study pathogenesis; differs in some aspects of pathogenesis, indicating the influence of parasite genetic variation
[18]
P. berghei NK65
C57BL/6: lethal
Is a murine noncerebral malaria strain; induces a progressive increase in parasitemia, intense hepatic inflammation, and death
[19]
P. berghei  XAT
Spontaneously cleared in immune competent mice
Irradiation-induced attenuated variant from lethal strainPb NK65; comparison of immune responses induced by these lethal and attenuated parasites lead us to elucidate the mechanisms of protective immunity and pathogenesis
[20]
P. yoelii
P. yoelii 17 NXL
BALB/c: non-lethal
Most strains resistant
Used to study immune mechanisms and pathogenesis;Py; line A1 is a mild line which is restricted to reticulocytes
[15]
P. yoelii 17XL
BALB/c: lethalC57BL/6: lethal
Most strainssusceptible
Used to identify vaccine-induced immune response
[21, 22]
P. yoeliiYM
CBA: lethal
Py-YM is virulent infection which multiplies in both immature and mature erythrocytes
[23]
P. yoeliiYA
CBA: non-lethal
YM parasites are responsible for normocyte invasion, increased virulence compared to mild linePy YA parasites; lines YM and A/C differed additionally in enzyme and drug-sensitivity markers
[24]
P. chabaudi
P. chabaudi AS
A/J: lethalC57BL/6: non-lethalBALB/c: non-lethal
C57BL/6 IL-10KO:susceptible
Used to study immune mechanisms and immunoregulation by cytokines, to identify susceptibility loci, and to study the immune basis of pathology
[25–28]
P. chabaudi AJ
BALB/c: non-lethal
Used to study experimental vaccines and immunological processes that control hyperparasitaemia
[25, 27]
P. chabaudi
adami DS
C3H:  lethalC57BL/6: non-lethal
Is fast-growing and high pathogenicity, induces more anemia, weight loss, and is less infective to mosquitoes than DK strain
[29, 30]
P. chabaudi
adami DK
BALB/c: non-lethalC3H: non-lethal
Is slower growing and less pathogenic and more selective in its invasion of subset of RBCs than DK
[29, 30]
P. vinckei
P. vinckei vinckei
BALB/c: lethalAKR: lethal
Used to study pathogenesis and for chemotherapy studies; it causes aggressive, overwhelming hyperparasitaemia
[31]
P. vinckei petteri
AKR: lethal (PvAS)AKR: non-lethal (PvAR)
Used for drug screening and immunological studies
[31]NK cells play an important role in restricting parasite replication. The absence of NK cells is associated with low IFN-γ serum levels and increased parasitemia in mice infected withP. chabaudi [37]. Likewise, the absence of IFN-γ reduces the ability of mice to control and eliminate parasites, eventually resulting in the death of the animals [38, 39]. Interestingly, macrophages (Mφ), but not IFN-γ, play a major role in the control of early peaks in lethal infections withP. yoelii [40]. In addition, IFN-γ produced by CD4+ T cells plays a pivotal role in protective immunity against non-lethal strains ofPlasmodium [41, 42]. In contrast, the infection withP. berghei ANKA induces high levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α which are associated with cerebral malaria [43]. However, the peak of parasitemia in athymic mice tends to be similar to the peak in WT mice. These results suggest that extrathymic T cells are the major lymphocyte subset associated with protection against malaria [44].In a resistant strain of mice, the presence of the parasite induces the production of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-γ. Furthermore, IL-12 is also necessary for elimination ofP. chabaudi AS [45],P. berghei XAT [20], andP. yoelii XNL [46].Besides, the inflammatory cytokine MIF (macrophage migration inhibitory factor) induces pathogenesis and susceptibility on BALB/c mice infected withP. chabaudi, high serum levels of MIF correlated with severity of disease [47]. In addition, infection of MIF knockout mice withP. chabaudi increases survival [48].CD4+ T cells, together with B cells, are crucial to develop efficient protection in murine experimental models [49, 50]. Whereas IFN-γ, produced by TCD4+, activates Mφ-mediated responses [51], the antibodies produced by B cells inhibit invasion of RBCs by the parasites [52], opsonize parasitized RBCs, block pRBC adhesion to the vascular endothelium, and neutralize parasite toxins [35]. In addition, mice rendered B cell deficient by treatment with anti-μ antibodies or B cell knockout mice (μMT) are unable to clear the erythrocytic infection ofP. chabaudi [50, 53, 54]. Specifically, the early acute infection is controlled to some extent, giving rise to chronic relapsing parasitemia that cannot be cleared. Finally, parasitemia can be reduced by adoptive transfer of B cells [50].Antibodies also induce pathology due to parasite antigens that are freed and adhere to healthy erythrocytes; this generates anemia or autoimmune reactions that cause damage to the kidneys and other tissues [55–58]. For example, pathogenesis of malaria nephropathy is linked to subendothelial deposits of immune complexes containing IgG and IgM [59, 60]. The antibodies involved in the elimination of the parasite mainly belong to cytophilic subclasses (IgG1 and IgG3) [50, 61]. In addition, high levels of immunoglobulin E (IgE) correlate with protection against severe malaria [62–64].Interestingly, after the peak of parasitemia, cellular immune responses should switch from Th1- to Th2-type response inP. chabaudi infected mice [65], because the malaria pathogenesis is caused by inappropriate or excessive inflammatory responses to eliminate the parasite [43, 66].Interestingly,Plasmodium can modulate the response of antigen presenting cells, such as Mφ and dendritic cells (DC), which leads to suppression of the immune response [67]. In the infection withP. yoelii YM, the DC function is affected by the presence of TNF-α [68]. Wykes et al. suggested that damage to the activity of DCs is due to a virulence factor that is present in certain parasite strains because, when DCs were transferred from mice infected with a “nonlethal” strain to mice infected with a “lethal” parasite strain, the mice were protected [46].The regulatory T cells are extremely important to control the inflammatory process in malaria, the number of CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Treg) increases in mice infected withP. yoelii [69] orP. berghei [70]. In addition, mice infected with the lethalP. yoelii XL17 show higher levels of IL-10 and TGF-β compared to mice infected with the nonlethal strainP. yoelii XNL, at early time points during infection [71]. Furthermore, the suppression of T cells induces lethality in mice infected withP. yoelii, while neutralization of TGF-β and IL-10 decreases parasitemia and prolongs the survival of infected mice [71, 72]. Accordingly, Couper et al. reported that the main sources of IL-10 in lethal infection withP. yoelii are Treg cells [73]. Finally, the ablation of Treg cells fromP. yoelii-infected DEREG-BALB/c mice significantly increases T cell activation and decreases parasitemia [74]. In addition, in mice infected with nonlethal strains ofP. yoelii, the presence of cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β during the chronic phase of infection was detected [71]. Thus, these data together suggest that the outcome of malaria infection could be determined by the balance of proinflammatory and regulatory immune responses, which could inhibit pathology (Figure 1).Figure 1
Representation of the course ofPlasmodium chabaudi infection. Early infection with the erythrocytic stage is characterized by the production of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-12 and TNF-α, and a pronounced IFN-γ response. In addition, NO produced by Mφ helped control parasitemia (1). IFN-γ activates Mφ-mediated responses, in particular phagocytosis and elimination of pRBC (2). CD4+ T cells, together with B cells, are crucial for developing efficient protection (3). Th1 production is downregulated later by an increased Th2-type immune response following primary infection (4). In a later stage of infection, after the peak parasitemia has been reached, CD4 T cells switch from a Th1 to a Th2 cytokine profile (5). This switch helps B cells produce antibodies (6). The antibodies inhibit the invasion of RBCs by the parasites, opsonize parasitized RBCs, or block pRBC adhesion to the vascular endothelium (7, 8). The slow late switch from noncytophilic (IgM and IgG2a) (7) to cytophilic subclasses (i.e., IgG1 and IgG3) (8) is involved in parasite elimination (9). However, IgE correlates with protection against severe malaria. Figure modified from Langhorne et al. 2004 [75] and Stevenson and Urban 2006 [67].


## 3. Helminths

Helminths are multicellular worms, some of which have adapted successfully to a parasitic lifestyle. They can be classified into three taxonomic groups: cestodes (e.g.,Taenia solium), nematodes (e.g.,Ascaris lumbricoides), and trematodes (e.g.,Schistosoma mansoni). Helminths vary in their biology in terms of size, lifecycle, and the diseases they cause. However, despite this complexity, helminths usually cause asymptomatic and chronic infections [76]. Helminths are among the most widespread infectious agents in human populations, especially in developing countries; they affect more than a third of the world’s population, and more than 20 species infect humans (Table 2) [1, 77–83].Table 2
Prevalence of common helminths in the world. These are estimates of the number of people with active infections. The number of people potentially exposed or with subclinical helminthic infections is much higher.
Helminth
Estimated number of infected people
Ref.
Nematodes
Ascaris lumbricoides
1450 billion
[77]
Trichuris trichiura
1050 million
[77]
Ancylostoma duodenale
740 million
[78]
Trichinella spiralis
600 million
Necator americanus
576 million
[1]
Brugia malayi
157 million
[1]
Wuchereria bancroftiand Brugia malayi
120 million
[79]
Strongyloides stercoralis
100 million
[80]
Onchocerca volvulus
37 million
[81]
Loa loa
13 million
[1]
Trematodes
Schistosoma spp.
207 million
[82]
Fasciola hepatica
17 million
Cestodes
Taenia spp.
0.4 million
[81]
Hymenolepis nana
75 million
Echinococcus spp.
2–3.6 million
[83]


### 3.1. Immune Response during Helminth Infections

Infection of mammals by helminth parasites typically results in a conserved series of immune events that are orchestrated and dominated by T helper cell type (Th2) events, characterized by the activation of eosinophils, basophils, and mast cells; high levels of immunoglobulin E (IgE); and the proliferation of T cells that secrete IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, and IL-13 [84, 85]. Despite this response, helminths are able to modulate and suppress the host immune response to promote their own survival and their persistence in the host for a long time, resulting in chronic infection [76, 86, 87]. These mechanisms include the ability to induce regulatory responses via regulatory T cells (Treg) which express molecules that inhibit the immune response, such as glucocorticoid-induced TNF-R-related protein (GITR) and the receptor cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) [88–91]. Treg cells also secrete suppressive cytokines, such as IL-10 and TGF-β [92]. On the other hand, B regulatory cells (Breg) also contribute to immune modulation and can release IL-10 and restrict proinflammatory responses [93]. Helminths also induce the differentiation of anti-inflammatory Mφ, called alternatively activated Mφ (AAMφ) [94, 95], as well as regulatory dendritic cells (DCreg), which are characterized by the expression of the regulatory cytokines IL-10 and TGF-β [96, 97] (Figure 2).Figure 2
Helminth infections are strong inducers of a Th2-type immune response. These infections are characterized by the expansion and activation of eosinophils, basophils, and mast cells (1). Their upregulation due to high levels of immunoglobulin E (IgE) and the proliferation of T cells that secrete IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, and IL-13 are part of the host immune response against the parasite (2). However, helminth infections tend to be long-lived and largely asymptomatic because helminth infections are sustained through a parasite-induced immunomodulatory network, in particular through activation of regulatory T cells (3) and systemically elevated levels of IL-10 produced by B regulatory cells (4). They are additionally affected by the expression of the regulatory cytokines IL-10 and TGF-β, produced by regulatory dendritic cells (5) and alternatively activated Mφ (AAMφ) (6).This anti-inflammatory or regulatory response could be potentially detrimental to the host if it interferes with the development of protection against other infections that require an inflammatory response, such asLeishmania major [9, 98] orTrypanosoma cruzi[8].The hyporesponsive immune response induced during chronic helminth infection affects not only the response to helminth antigens but also to other antigens. Several studies have examined the effect of infections on the immune response to other unrelated antigens. In particular, it has been shown that the response to vaccines can be modified by the presence of concomitant helminth infection. For example, chronicOnchocerca infection [99],Lymphatic filariasis [42], orSchistosoma [100] reduces the effectiveness of the tetanus vaccine. Likewise, chronicOnchocerca infection affectsBacillus Calmette-Guérin andRubella vaccinations [101]. Similarly,Ascaris lumbricoides reduces the response to the oral cholera vaccine, which can be restored by albendazole treatment [102]. However, helminthic infections are beneficial in the control of excessive inflammatory reactions, such as Crohn’s disease [103] and ulcerative colitis [104], as well as in allergic diseases [105–107] and autoimmune diseases, such as encephalomyelitis [108, 109] and arthritis [110].Despite the widespread acceptance that helminthic infections influence each other directly or indirectly, little attention has been paid to helminth-Plasmodium coinfections. One reason is that the interactions involved are complex and difficult to understand. Here, we will try to discuss several reports about helminth-malaria coinfections to clarify the consequences of this interaction.


## 3.1. Immune Response during Helminth Infections

Infection of mammals by helminth parasites typically results in a conserved series of immune events that are orchestrated and dominated by T helper cell type (Th2) events, characterized by the activation of eosinophils, basophils, and mast cells; high levels of immunoglobulin E (IgE); and the proliferation of T cells that secrete IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, and IL-13 [84, 85]. Despite this response, helminths are able to modulate and suppress the host immune response to promote their own survival and their persistence in the host for a long time, resulting in chronic infection [76, 86, 87]. These mechanisms include the ability to induce regulatory responses via regulatory T cells (Treg) which express molecules that inhibit the immune response, such as glucocorticoid-induced TNF-R-related protein (GITR) and the receptor cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) [88–91]. Treg cells also secrete suppressive cytokines, such as IL-10 and TGF-β [92]. On the other hand, B regulatory cells (Breg) also contribute to immune modulation and can release IL-10 and restrict proinflammatory responses [93]. Helminths also induce the differentiation of anti-inflammatory Mφ, called alternatively activated Mφ (AAMφ) [94, 95], as well as regulatory dendritic cells (DCreg), which are characterized by the expression of the regulatory cytokines IL-10 and TGF-β [96, 97] (Figure 2).Figure 2
Helminth infections are strong inducers of a Th2-type immune response. These infections are characterized by the expansion and activation of eosinophils, basophils, and mast cells (1). Their upregulation due to high levels of immunoglobulin E (IgE) and the proliferation of T cells that secrete IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, and IL-13 are part of the host immune response against the parasite (2). However, helminth infections tend to be long-lived and largely asymptomatic because helminth infections are sustained through a parasite-induced immunomodulatory network, in particular through activation of regulatory T cells (3) and systemically elevated levels of IL-10 produced by B regulatory cells (4). They are additionally affected by the expression of the regulatory cytokines IL-10 and TGF-β, produced by regulatory dendritic cells (5) and alternatively activated Mφ (AAMφ) (6).This anti-inflammatory or regulatory response could be potentially detrimental to the host if it interferes with the development of protection against other infections that require an inflammatory response, such asLeishmania major [9, 98] orTrypanosoma cruzi[8].The hyporesponsive immune response induced during chronic helminth infection affects not only the response to helminth antigens but also to other antigens. Several studies have examined the effect of infections on the immune response to other unrelated antigens. In particular, it has been shown that the response to vaccines can be modified by the presence of concomitant helminth infection. For example, chronicOnchocerca infection [99],Lymphatic filariasis [42], orSchistosoma [100] reduces the effectiveness of the tetanus vaccine. Likewise, chronicOnchocerca infection affectsBacillus Calmette-Guérin andRubella vaccinations [101]. Similarly,Ascaris lumbricoides reduces the response to the oral cholera vaccine, which can be restored by albendazole treatment [102]. However, helminthic infections are beneficial in the control of excessive inflammatory reactions, such as Crohn’s disease [103] and ulcerative colitis [104], as well as in allergic diseases [105–107] and autoimmune diseases, such as encephalomyelitis [108, 109] and arthritis [110].Despite the widespread acceptance that helminthic infections influence each other directly or indirectly, little attention has been paid to helminth-Plasmodium coinfections. One reason is that the interactions involved are complex and difficult to understand. Here, we will try to discuss several reports about helminth-malaria coinfections to clarify the consequences of this interaction.


## 4. HumanPlasmodium-Helminth Coinfection

Plasmodium spp. infect between 349 and 552 million people and kill over one million each year; approximately 40% of the world’s population is at risk of being infected [2, 111]. Importantly, people living in malaria-endemic regions are exposed to other pathogens, especially those associated with poverty, such as helminths.Several studies have been carried out to explore the influence of helminths onPlasmodium infection in humans (Table 3). However, the evidences described in these researches are controversial. While some studies have reported that helminth infection favors protection because reduces thePlasmodium parasite density [112], promotes protection against clinical malaria [113, 114], reduces anemia [113, 115, 116], cerebral malaria [117] and renal failure [118] (Table 3(a)). Other studies showed no influence of helminths on the curse ofPlasmodium infection [119–121] (Table 3(b)). In contrast, others showed an increased susceptibility toPlasmodium infection [114, 122], increased risk of complications [123–125], anemia [125, 126], hepatosplenomegaly [127, 128], and increasedPlasmodium parasite load [129, 130] (Table 3(c)).Table 3
Human studies of coinfection. ARF: acute renal failure, MSM: moderately severe malaria,S: Schistosoma, A: Ascaris, andT: Trichuris.
(a)
Study area
Age of group
Sample (size)
Study design
Helminth type
Outcome  for malaria diseases in coinfection
Ref.
Senegal (Niakhar)
Children
178
Over a 2-yearfollowup period
S. haematobium
Children with a lightS. haematobium infection presented lower P. falciparum parasite densities than children not infected by S. haematobium
[112]
Mali (Tieneguebougou and Bougoudiana)
Children and young adults
62
Followed prospectively through a malariatransmission season
Wuchereria bancrofti
Mansonella perstans
Pre-existent filarial infection attenuates immune responses associated with severe malaria and protects against anemia, but has little effect on susceptibility to or severity of acute malaria infection
[113]
SouthernEthiopia
1 to 82 yearsMean  18.6 years
1,065 febrile patients
Cross-sectional
A. lumbricoides
T.trichiura, S. mansoni, and hookworm
The chance of developing non-severe malaria were 2.6–3.3 times higher in individuals infected with helminth, compared to intestinal helminth-free individualsThe odds ratio for being infected with non-severe P. falciparum increased with the number of intestinal helminth species
[114]
South-centralCôte d’Ivoire
Infants (6–23 months),  children   (6–8 year), and young women  (15–25 years)
732 subjects
Cross-sectional survey
Soil-transmitted helminth
Coinfected children had lower odds of anemia and iron deficiency.Interaction between P. falciparum and light-intensity hookworm infections vary with age.
[115]
Brasil (Careiro)
School children5 to 14 years
236
Cohort and  cross-sectional
A. lumbricoides hookworm and T. trichiura
Helminthes protect against hemoglobin decrease during an acute malarial attack byPlasmodium.
[116]
Thailand (Bangkok)
Mean 24 years (range15–62)
537 files
Retrospective case-control
A. lumbricoides
Percentage protection for mild controls against cerebral malaria ranged from 40% forAscaris(present/absent) to 70% for Ascarismedium infection. For intermediate controls protection against cerebral malaria was 75% for Ascaris(present/absent).
[117]
Thailand (Bangkok)
19–37 years22 patients with malaria-associated ARF and 157 patients with MSM
179
Retrospective case-control
A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura,hookworm, and Strongyloides
stercoralis
Helminths were associated with protection from renal failureHelminth-infected controls were less likely to have jaundice or to have peripheral mature schizonts than controls without helminths
[118]
(b)
Study area
Age of group
Sample (size)
Study design
Helminth type
Outcome  for malaria diseases in coinfection
Ref.
Kenya (Kingwede)
8 years and older
561
cross-sectional
S. haematobium
Children had 9.3 times the odds of coinfectioncompared to adults
[119]
Nigeria (Osun)
preschool children (6–59 months)
690
Double-blind and  randomized
A. lumbricoides
There was no significant difference in the severity of anaemia.
[120]
Kabale,Uganda
All ages (856)
856
Retrospective;18 months
A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura, and hookworm
Non evidence for an association and risk of malaria
[121]
(c)
Study area
Age of group
Sample (size)
Study design
Helminth type
Outcome  for malaria diseases in coinfection
Ref.
Senegal (Niakhar and Bambey)
Children, mean 6.6 years
105
Prospective case-control
A. lumbricoides
Prevalence ofA. lumbricoidesinfection was higher in cases of severe malaria
[123]
NorthernSenegal
Children aged 6–15 years
512
Cohort
S. mansoni
The incidence rate of malaria attacks was higher amongS. mansoni-infected individuals carrying the highest worm loads. In contrast, the rate of malaria attacks were lower in medium grade S. mansoniinfections
[124]
Ghana (Kumasi)
Women (15–48 years)  mean 26.8 years
746
Cross-sectional
A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura, S. stercoralis, and E. vermicularis
Coinfection resulted in increased risks of anemia, low birth weight, and small for gestational age infants
[125]
Ethiopia (Alaba Kulito)
Children <5 years, children 5–14 years, and adults ≥15 years
1802 acute febrile patients
case-control
Hookworm,
A. lumbricoides, and T. trichiura
Coinfection is associated with higher anaemia prevalence and low weight status than single infection withPlasmodiumin children
[126]
Kenya(Makueni)
Primary school children4–17 years
(221 and 228)
Cross-sectional
S. mansoni
Hepatosplenomegaly due to proinflammatory mechanism exacerbated by schistosomiasis
[127]
Kenya (Mangalete)
Children4–17 years
79
Cross-sectional
S. mansoni
Hepatosplenomegaly is associated with low regulatory and Th2 response toSchistosome antigens
[128]
Zimbabwe (Burma Valley)
Children 6–17 years
605
12-month followup of a cohort of children
Schistosome
Increased prevalence of malaria parasites and had higher sexual stage malaria parasite in children coinfected with schistosomiasis
[129]
Cameroon (Bolifamba)
9 months to 14 years
425 children
A. lumbricoides,
T. trichiura, and hookworm
Coinfections in which heavy helminth loads showed highP. falciparumparasite loads compared with coinfections involving light helminth burden
[130]Although a Th2 phenotype is a conserved response to helminth infection in human and mice, the nature of the host immune response varies considerably between species of helminths; in some cases Th1 immune response predominates, depending on both the time of infection and the helminth development stage [131, 132]. The time that Th1 immune response is sustained until it polarizes toward Th2, could vary between species [133–135]. Thus, the controversial results related to helminth-Plasmodium coinfection in humans could be explained because many studies did not consider critical features of the helminth parasite biology. For example, the biological niche or parasite stage within the host. Neither the previous time of infection with the helminth nor the nutrition state and age of the host were taken into account.Because all of these variables were not considered in existing studies in humans and in order to establish a possible consensus, we review in detail the murinePlasmodium-helminth coinfections, which in theory, controlled variables more rigorously.


## 5. Experimental Models of Coinfection

Although helminth infections in mice are a questionable model for chronic helminth infections in humans, the fact is that many intraintestinal helminths can reach large biomass which can change the cytokine environment and therefore the possible mechanisms of response. By establishing chronic infections and inducing strong Th2-type responses, helminths could have a potentially significant influence on the nature of the immune response in infected individuals and hence modify their susceptibility to subsequent infections with other important pathogens, at least those that require a Th1-type or mixed Th1-/Th2-type immune response, such asPlasmodium sp.


### 5.1.Schistosoma-Plasmodium Coinfection

According to the theory that Th2-type response evoked in response to helminth infection would have the ability to suppress proinflammatory Th1 response that generates immunopathology inPlasmodium-infected individuals, there are some reports of experimental models of coinfection withPlasmodium berghei ANKA (Pb) afterSchistosoma mansoni (Sm) infection in ICR mice or withSchistosoma japonicum- (Sj-)Pb in C57BL/6 mice 7 or 8 weeks after helminthic infection, respectively; both coinfections showed a delay in death of mice [136, 137]. Interestingly, there was a reduction in the brain pathology associated with high levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13 [136–138].In contrast, similar coinfection withPb 7 or 8 weeks afterSm infection showed an increase in mortality and parasitemia in Swiss albino and C57BL/6 mice [138, 139]. Moreover, the coinfections in Swiss albino mice reduced the effectiveness of antimalarial treatments and delayed elimination of the parasite [139] (Table 4(a)). In these reports neither evidence of immune response nor pathology data were shown. Thus, we speculate that increase parasite load was probably due to the presence of helminth than inhibited Th1-type immune response which was able to contain the replication ofPlasmodium, and the increased mortality was due to parasite load rather than a pathological Th1-state dependent. In line with this hypothesis, coinfection withPlasmodium chabaudi (Pc) at 8 weeks afterSm infection in C57BL/6 mice allowed highPc replication. This increase was associated with low levels of the proinflammatory TNF-α [140].Table 4
Helminthic infection drives immune response to challenge withPlasmodium. *The time after helminth infection when the Plasmodium challenge was performed. ND: nondetermined, wks: weeks, KO: knockout, ECM: experimental cerebral malaria.
(a)
Background mouse
Plasmodium strain
Helminth type
Coinfection time*
Malaria disease outcome
Ref.
ICR HSD
P. berghei ANKA
S. mansoni
7 wks
Low rates of ECM (30%), delay in death associated with high levels of IL-4, IL-10
[136]
C57BL/6
P. berghei ANKA
S. japonicum
8 wks
Increased survival rate and reduction of the brain pathology. Th2 response induced by worm plays an important role in protecting against ECM
[137]
C57BL/6
P. berghei ANKA
S. mansoni
8-9 wks
Increased parasitemia, mortality, weight loss, and hypothermia; decreased pathology in the brain associated with high levels of IL-5, IL-13 and low serum IFN-γ
[138]
Swiss albino
P. berghei ANKA
S. mansoni
7 wks
Increased parasitemia and mortalityDelayed reduction/elimination of the parasite followed by administration of antimalarial treatment
[139]
C57BL/6
P. chabaudi
S. mansoni
8 wks
Increased parasitemia associated with a deficiency in the production of TNF-α
[140]
BALB/c
P. yoelii NXL (non-lethal)
S. mansoni
2, 4, and 6 wks
Increased parasitemia and death at 6 wks of coinfection. Hepatosplenomegaly was more marked in coinfected mice compared to either disease separately
[141]
A/J
P. chabaudi
S. mansoni
8 wks
Mice escape death and showed high production of IFN-γ
[142]
(b)
Background mouse
Plasmodium strain
Helminth type
Coinfection time*
Malaria disease outcome
Ref.
C57BL/6
P. chabaudi
H. polygyrus
2, 3, or 5 wks
Increased parasitemia and mortality associated with low levels of IFN-γ and high levels of TGF-β, IL-10
[143]
C57BL/6
P. chabaudi AS
H. polygyrus
2 wks
Increased parasitemia; however, it ameliorates severe hypothermia and hypoglycaemia; besides this, it induced earlier reticulocytosis thanPc-infected WT mice
[144]
C57BL/6IFN−/− IL-23−/−
P. chabaudi AS
H. polygyrus
At the same time
Increased mortality and severe liver disease, associated with increased IFN-γ, IL-17, and IL-22 in the liver. The coinfected IFN−/− and IL-23−/− mice survive
[145]
C57BL/6BALB/c
P. chabaudi AS
H. polygyrus
2 wkswith AgPc + adjuvant
Suppresses the protective efficacy of the malaria vaccine. Deworming treatment before antimalarial immunization restored the protective immunity to malaria challenge
[146]
C57BL/6
P. yoelii  17 XNL
H. polygyrus
2 wks
Increased pathology due to reduced response againstPy (low levels of IFN-γ) in the spleen cells, as a result of higher activation of Treg
[147]
BALB/c
P. yoelii 17 NXL
H. polygyrus
3 wks
Reduction of pathology, low levels of IFN-γ, and high levels of IL-4 induced by helminthes
[148]
C57BL/6
P. berghei ANKA
H. polygyrus
2 wks
Hp infection did not alter ECM development, despite accelerated P. berghei growth in vivo
[149]
C57BL/6 BALB/c
P. berghei ANKA
H. polygyrus
2 wks
No differences
[150]
(c)
Background mouse
Plasmodium strain
Helminth type
Coinfection time*
Malaria disease outcome
Ref.
BALB/c
P. yoelii 17 NXL
E. caproni
3 wks
Ec showed counterregulatory antiparasite cytokine responses to non-lethal strain PyNXL (less IFN-γ and high IL-4 levels induced by E
c)
[148]
BALB/c
P. yoelii 17 NXL
E. caproni
5 wks
Increased mortality and pathology; the pathology was reversible through clearance ofE
c by praziquantel treatment
[151]
BALB/c
P. yoelii 17XL
E. caproni
5 wks
E
c does not alter the course of Py17XL infection
[151]
(d)
Background mouse
Plasmodium strain
Helminth type
Coinfection time*
Malaria disease outcome
Ref.
C57BL/6
P. yoelii 17NXL
Strongyloides ratti
1 wk
Did not altered cytokine response
[152]
BALB/c
P. berghei ANKA
Strongyloides ratti
1 wk
The coinfection did not change the efficacy of vaccination againstPb
[153]
(e)
Background mouse
Plasmodium strain
Helminth type
Coinfection time*
Malaria disease outcome
Ref.
BALB/c
P.  chabaudi
Nippostrongylus
brasiliensis
Same day
Reduction of anemia and parasitemia. Th2 response was inhibited byPlasmodium
[154]
C57BL/6
P. berghei
Nippostrongylus brasiliensis
3 wks
Delayed peak parasitemia, increased survival
[155]
(f)
Background mouse
Plasmodium strain
Helminth type
Coinfection time*
Malaria disease outcome
Ref.
BALB/c
P. chabaudi
L. sigmodontis
8 wks
Increased severity of the anemia and weight loss associated with increased IFN-γ
[156]
C57BL/6IL-10KO
P. berghei (ANKA)
L. sigmodontis
8 wks
Reduction of ECM associated with increased IL-10IL-10KO mice coinfected with Pb-Ls die of ECM
[157]
BALB/c
P. berghei ANKA
L. sigmodontis
2 wks
Reduced protection againstP. berghei challenge infection for low frequencies of CSP-specific CD8 T cells, CSP-specific IFN-γ and TNF-α production
[153]
(g)
Background mouse
Plasmodium strain
Helminth type
Coinfection time*
Malaria disease outcome
Ref.
CBA
P. berghei (ANKA)
Brugia pahangi irradiated attenuated
1 wk
Increased survival and protected them against the ECM development; increase synthesis of IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-5, and IgE
[158]
(h)
Background mouse
Plasmodium strain
Helminth type
Coinfection time*
Malaria disease outcome
Ref.
C57BL/6
P. berghei
Trichinella spiralis
1–4 wks
Partially subdued parasitaemia and prolonged survival
[159]It is known that the immune response againstSchistosoma shifts from an early helminth-protective Th1-type immune response to a late helminth-permissive Th2-type response during the course of infection [134]. Thus, the moment when the second infection is acquired (2, 4 and 6 weeks post-helminth infection) would be critical for disease outcome and pathology [141]. These findings could be supported by the fact that chronicallySm-infected BALB/c mice coinfected (6 weeks) with the nonlethal strainPlasmodium yoelii NXL (PyNXL) showed high mortality. In contrast, no mortality was observed in acutely (2 or 4 weeks) coinfected mice, although they developed high parasitemia and hepatomegaly was higher in coinfected mice compared with mice infected with each parasite separately [141] (Table 3(a)). Therefore, the time of previous infection may influence the response againstPlasmodium.Together, these reports suggested that the Th2 response, induced bySchistosoma, plays an important role in protecting against immunopathology in cerebral malaria. However, the presence ofSchistosoma does not appear to modify the virulence ofPb and, consequently, it does not alter the lethality ofPlasmodium infection.Finally, one report scape to the theory that Th2-type immune response evoked by the helminth infection would possess the ability to suppress the proinflammatory Th1-type response in its host.Sm-infected A/J mice coinfected at 8 weeks withPc were protected by the presence of concomitantSm infection. The mice escaped death due to malaria; this effect was accompanied by enhanced levels of IFN-γ [142] (Table 4(a)).


### 5.2.Heligmosomoides polygyrus-Plasmodium Coinfection

Several studies used mice of the same genetic background. Additionally, equivalent helminth andPlasmodium strains have been used to explain whether previous helminthic infection plays an important role in the immune response againstPlasmodium. Su et al. showed that C57BL/6 mice previously infected withHeligmosomoides polygyrus (Hp) and challenged withPc either 3 or 5 weeks after helminthic infections developed highPc-parasitemia and mortality, which was associated with low levels of IFN-γ and high levels of TGF-β and IL-10 [143]. However,Hp-Pc coinfection at 2 weeks resulted in less severe pathology (i.e., less hypothermia and hypoglycemia) and induced earlier reticulocytosis compared with mice infected only withPc [144] (Table 4(b)).Helmby in 2009 showed that mice developed high mortality in theHp-Pc model when the two infections were introduced simultaneously. The mortality was due to severe liver pathology associated with increased IFN-γ, IL-17, and IL-22. Interestingly, when using an IFN-γ and IL-23 knockout strain, the mice survived the coinfection [145]. Thus, simultaneousHp-Pc coinfection increased mortality, which may be a consequence of a synergistic effect that increased the inflammatory response (Table 4(b)).In fact, in the first case, in whichHp-Pc coinfection was performed at 3 or 5 weeks after the initial helminthic infection, the high mortality observed may have been due to the anti-inflammatory response generated by the previous helminthic infection, which inhibited the inflammatory response necessary for control of thePlasmodium infection. However, when the coinfection was performed at the same time, mice developed a stronger inflammatory response, which generated greater pathology and mortality. This susceptibility is supported by the observation that chronic helminthic infection suppresses effective vaccine-induced protection againstPlasmodium. However, when mice were administered with antihelminthicHp treatment before malaria vaccination, the protective immunity againstPc was restored [146]. Therefore, the timing of the infection withHp plays an important role in the type of immune response that is generated within the host, and it determines the susceptibility following challenge withPlasmodium.The genetic background of mice infected with helminths has a crucial role in the outcome of the immune response toPlasmodium. For example, coinfection with the nonlethalPyNXL strain at 2 weeks afterHp infection in C57BL/6 mice resulted in exacerbated pathology and poor survival of mice. This susceptibility was associated with a reduced response againstPyNXL (i.e., low levels of IFN-γ) in the spleen cells. As a consequence, it increased the activation of Treg cells [147]. However, the same coinfection at 3 weeks in BALB/c mice decreased the pathology associated with low levels of IFN-γ and increased levels of IL-4, but not IL-10 [148]. Therefore, the genetic background of mice infected with the helminth determines the outcome ofPyNXL infection (Table 4(b)).What happens when a lethal strain ofPlasmodium was used in coinfection withHp? ThePb ANKA infection in C57BL/6 mice induced typical symptoms of ECM [160, 161]. Coinfection withHp-Pb ANKA 2 weeks after initial helminthic infection did not modify the development of ECM despite acceleratedPb growthin vivo [149]. Likewise, other results from the same model of coinfection in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice showed no differences in parasitemia, anemia, or body weight in relation to mice infected only withPlasmodium [150]. Therefore,Hp infection does not affect the outcome ofPb ANKA (Table 4(b)).


### 5.3.Echinostoma caproni-Plasmodium Coinfection

Studies in BALB/c mice infected for 3 weeks withE. caproni (Ec) and then coinfected with the nonlethal strainPyNXL showed that exacerbation ofPlasmodium-induced pathology was associated with a deficit in IFN-γ production [148]. Similarly, whenEc-infected mice were coinfected at 5 weeks, increased mortality was observed. The exacerbated pathology was reversible through the clearance ofEc worms via praziquantel treatment [151]. However, coinfection at 5 weeks with the lethalPyXL strain did not alter the course of infection; all mice infected withPyXL (i.e., alone, in combination withE. caproni, or praziquantel treated) died on day 10 after infection [151] (Table 4(c)). Therefore,Ec infection does not affect the outcome of lethalPyXL, butEc infection affects the protective response against a nonlethalPlasmodium strain.


### 5.4.Strongyloides ratti-Plasmodium Coinfection

MurineStrongyloides ratti (Sr) infection is a transient helminthic infection that is resolved spontaneously within 3-4 weeks. This infection induces a strong Th2-type immune response at day 6 after infection [135]. When BALB/c mice were coinfected with the nonlethal strainPyNXL at day 6 afterSr infection,Sr induced a slightly enhanced peak ofPlasmodium parasitemia and loss of body weight. In contrast, in C57BL/6 mice coinfected at day 6, parasitemia level and body weight were not altered. Interestingly, the Th2-type immune response induced bySr was significantly reduced uponPyNXL coinfection [152]. In addition,PyNXL clearance was not affected by previous infection withSr in either C57BL/6 or BALB/c mice. Moreover, infection withSr in BALB/c mice did not change the efficacy of vaccination againstPb ANKA [153]. Therefore, infection withSr does not affect the protective response againstPlasmodium, although it generates small changes in parasitemia levels; which is not decisive for the outcome ofPlasmodium infection (Table 4(d)).


### 5.5.Nippostrongylus brasiliensis-Plasmodium Coinfection

BALB/c mice infected withNippostrongylus brasiliensis (Nb) exhibit a strong Th2-type immune response [162]. Even so, when BALB/c mice were coinfected withNb andPc simultaneously, the Th2 response againstNb was impaired byPlasmodium. Interestingly, theNb-Pc coinfection had a beneficial effect; it slightly ameliorated the severity of malarial anemia (SMA) and decreased parasitemia levels [154]. Similarly, C57BL/6 mice infected for 3 weeks withNb and then coinfected withPb showed a delayed peak parasitemia and an increased survival time [155]. Thus, the presence of concomitantNb infection plays an important role in inhibiting pathology associated with a challenge withPc orPb (Table 4(e)).


### 5.6. Coinfection with Other Helminths

Experimental models of coinfection withLitomosoides sigmodontis (Ls) 8 weeks andPc infection in BALB/c mice showed increased SMA and weight loss associated with increased levels of IFN-γ [156]. In contrast, coinfection withLs 8 weeks andPb infection in C57BL/6 mice showed significantly reduced ECM rates associated with increased levels of IL-10. This protection was inhibited in IL-10 KO mice [157]. High levels of IL-10 were important in reducing pathology but also interfered with the protective response toPlasmodium in the liver. In particular, chronic infection withLs interfered with the protective efficacy of a vaccine against sporozoitePb in the liver [153]. Therefore, infection withLs exacerbates the pathology of aPc infection. In contrast, infection withLs inhibits pathology inPb infection due to an anti-inflammatory cytokine response (Table 4(f)).In addition, CBA/J mice infected withBrugia pahangi (Bp) for 1 week and then coinfected withPb displayed a low mortality rate, and mice were protected against the development of ECM. This protection was associated with increased serum IgE levels and Th2 cytokine production [158] (Table 4(g)). Similarly, infection withTrichinella spiralis (Ts) for 1 or 4 weeks in C57BL/6 mice greatly enhanced their resistance against the fatal coinfection withPb [159]. Therefore, these observations suggest that the Th2-type immune response reduces brain pathology and increases survival inBp- orTs-Pb coinfection, perhaps due to the anti-inflammatory environment generated by the previous helminth infection (Table 4(h)).The studies described above lead to different conclusions, while some of them suggest that prior infection with helminths induces resistance toPlasmodium [136, 137, 142, 148, 154, 155, 157–159], other studies do not show effects [149–153] and finally some others demonstrated an increased susceptibility toPlasmodium infection [138–141, 143–148, 151, 153, 156]. These contrasting results may partially be explained because this interaction is affected by the timing between the hosts’ exposure to the helminth andPlasmodium. In addition, the strain of each parasite is also important, coinfection with nonlethalPlasmodium strains in the early stages of a helminthic infection delayed the onset of parasitemia due to early, specific high production of IFN-γ, but this response increased pathology. In contrast, a significant increase in susceptibility to nonlethalPlasmodium was observed when mice were coinfected withPlasmodium in the late stages of helminthic infection, when the Th2-type immune response is predominant.Coinfection with lethal strains ofPlasmodium in the late stages of a helminthic infection inhibits severe pathology and increases the survival of mice due to a decrease inflammatory response (mainly IFN-γ and TNF-α). In addition, the presence of a late anti-inflammatory Th2-type immune response induced by helminthic infection extended the survival of mice susceptible toPlasmodium infection; this may be due to a reduced pathological Th1-type immune response or may be due to induction of protective mix of Th1 and Th2 immune response. Recruitment and activation of Mφ are essential for the clearance of malaria infections, but these have also been associated with adverse clinical outcomes [163]. Specifically, immunopathology of severe malaria is often originated from an excessive inflammatory Th1-type immune response. The expansion of Treg cells and the alternative activation of Mφ by helminth infections may modulate the excessive inflammatory response toPlasmodium. Therefore, the chronic helminth infections inhibited pathology and increased survival in the challenge with lethal strains ofPlasmodium.


## 5.1.Schistosoma-Plasmodium Coinfection

According to the theory that Th2-type response evoked in response to helminth infection would have the ability to suppress proinflammatory Th1 response that generates immunopathology inPlasmodium-infected individuals, there are some reports of experimental models of coinfection withPlasmodium berghei ANKA (Pb) afterSchistosoma mansoni (Sm) infection in ICR mice or withSchistosoma japonicum- (Sj-)Pb in C57BL/6 mice 7 or 8 weeks after helminthic infection, respectively; both coinfections showed a delay in death of mice [136, 137]. Interestingly, there was a reduction in the brain pathology associated with high levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13 [136–138].In contrast, similar coinfection withPb 7 or 8 weeks afterSm infection showed an increase in mortality and parasitemia in Swiss albino and C57BL/6 mice [138, 139]. Moreover, the coinfections in Swiss albino mice reduced the effectiveness of antimalarial treatments and delayed elimination of the parasite [139] (Table 4(a)). In these reports neither evidence of immune response nor pathology data were shown. Thus, we speculate that increase parasite load was probably due to the presence of helminth than inhibited Th1-type immune response which was able to contain the replication ofPlasmodium, and the increased mortality was due to parasite load rather than a pathological Th1-state dependent. In line with this hypothesis, coinfection withPlasmodium chabaudi (Pc) at 8 weeks afterSm infection in C57BL/6 mice allowed highPc replication. This increase was associated with low levels of the proinflammatory TNF-α [140].Table 4
Helminthic infection drives immune response to challenge withPlasmodium. *The time after helminth infection when the Plasmodium challenge was performed. ND: nondetermined, wks: weeks, KO: knockout, ECM: experimental cerebral malaria.
(a)
Background mouse
Plasmodium strain
Helminth type
Coinfection time*
Malaria disease outcome
Ref.
ICR HSD
P. berghei ANKA
S. mansoni
7 wks
Low rates of ECM (30%), delay in death associated with high levels of IL-4, IL-10
[136]
C57BL/6
P. berghei ANKA
S. japonicum
8 wks
Increased survival rate and reduction of the brain pathology. Th2 response induced by worm plays an important role in protecting against ECM
[137]
C57BL/6
P. berghei ANKA
S. mansoni
8-9 wks
Increased parasitemia, mortality, weight loss, and hypothermia; decreased pathology in the brain associated with high levels of IL-5, IL-13 and low serum IFN-γ
[138]
Swiss albino
P. berghei ANKA
S. mansoni
7 wks
Increased parasitemia and mortalityDelayed reduction/elimination of the parasite followed by administration of antimalarial treatment
[139]
C57BL/6
P. chabaudi
S. mansoni
8 wks
Increased parasitemia associated with a deficiency in the production of TNF-α
[140]
BALB/c
P. yoelii NXL (non-lethal)
S. mansoni
2, 4, and 6 wks
Increased parasitemia and death at 6 wks of coinfection. Hepatosplenomegaly was more marked in coinfected mice compared to either disease separately
[141]
A/J
P. chabaudi
S. mansoni
8 wks
Mice escape death and showed high production of IFN-γ
[142]
(b)
Background mouse
Plasmodium strain
Helminth type
Coinfection time*
Malaria disease outcome
Ref.
C57BL/6
P. chabaudi
H. polygyrus
2, 3, or 5 wks
Increased parasitemia and mortality associated with low levels of IFN-γ and high levels of TGF-β, IL-10
[143]
C57BL/6
P. chabaudi AS
H. polygyrus
2 wks
Increased parasitemia; however, it ameliorates severe hypothermia and hypoglycaemia; besides this, it induced earlier reticulocytosis thanPc-infected WT mice
[144]
C57BL/6IFN−/− IL-23−/−
P. chabaudi AS
H. polygyrus
At the same time
Increased mortality and severe liver disease, associated with increased IFN-γ, IL-17, and IL-22 in the liver. The coinfected IFN−/− and IL-23−/− mice survive
[145]
C57BL/6BALB/c
P. chabaudi AS
H. polygyrus
2 wkswith AgPc + adjuvant
Suppresses the protective efficacy of the malaria vaccine. Deworming treatment before antimalarial immunization restored the protective immunity to malaria challenge
[146]
C57BL/6
P. yoelii  17 XNL
H. polygyrus
2 wks
Increased pathology due to reduced response againstPy (low levels of IFN-γ) in the spleen cells, as a result of higher activation of Treg
[147]
BALB/c
P. yoelii 17 NXL
H. polygyrus
3 wks
Reduction of pathology, low levels of IFN-γ, and high levels of IL-4 induced by helminthes
[148]
C57BL/6
P. berghei ANKA
H. polygyrus
2 wks
Hp infection did not alter ECM development, despite accelerated P. berghei growth in vivo
[149]
C57BL/6 BALB/c
P. berghei ANKA
H. polygyrus
2 wks
No differences
[150]
(c)
Background mouse
Plasmodium strain
Helminth type
Coinfection time*
Malaria disease outcome
Ref.
BALB/c
P. yoelii 17 NXL
E. caproni
3 wks
Ec showed counterregulatory antiparasite cytokine responses to non-lethal strain PyNXL (less IFN-γ and high IL-4 levels induced by E
c)
[148]
BALB/c
P. yoelii 17 NXL
E. caproni
5 wks
Increased mortality and pathology; the pathology was reversible through clearance ofE
c by praziquantel treatment
[151]
BALB/c
P. yoelii 17XL
E. caproni
5 wks
E
c does not alter the course of Py17XL infection
[151]
(d)
Background mouse
Plasmodium strain
Helminth type
Coinfection time*
Malaria disease outcome
Ref.
C57BL/6
P. yoelii 17NXL
Strongyloides ratti
1 wk
Did not altered cytokine response
[152]
BALB/c
P. berghei ANKA
Strongyloides ratti
1 wk
The coinfection did not change the efficacy of vaccination againstPb
[153]
(e)
Background mouse
Plasmodium strain
Helminth type
Coinfection time*
Malaria disease outcome
Ref.
BALB/c
P.  chabaudi
Nippostrongylus
brasiliensis
Same day
Reduction of anemia and parasitemia. Th2 response was inhibited byPlasmodium
[154]
C57BL/6
P. berghei
Nippostrongylus brasiliensis
3 wks
Delayed peak parasitemia, increased survival
[155]
(f)
Background mouse
Plasmodium strain
Helminth type
Coinfection time*
Malaria disease outcome
Ref.
BALB/c
P. chabaudi
L. sigmodontis
8 wks
Increased severity of the anemia and weight loss associated with increased IFN-γ
[156]
C57BL/6IL-10KO
P. berghei (ANKA)
L. sigmodontis
8 wks
Reduction of ECM associated with increased IL-10IL-10KO mice coinfected with Pb-Ls die of ECM
[157]
BALB/c
P. berghei ANKA
L. sigmodontis
2 wks
Reduced protection againstP. berghei challenge infection for low frequencies of CSP-specific CD8 T cells, CSP-specific IFN-γ and TNF-α production
[153]
(g)
Background mouse
Plasmodium strain
Helminth type
Coinfection time*
Malaria disease outcome
Ref.
CBA
P. berghei (ANKA)
Brugia pahangi irradiated attenuated
1 wk
Increased survival and protected them against the ECM development; increase synthesis of IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-5, and IgE
[158]
(h)
Background mouse
Plasmodium strain
Helminth type
Coinfection time*
Malaria disease outcome
Ref.
C57BL/6
P. berghei
Trichinella spiralis
1–4 wks
Partially subdued parasitaemia and prolonged survival
[159]It is known that the immune response againstSchistosoma shifts from an early helminth-protective Th1-type immune response to a late helminth-permissive Th2-type response during the course of infection [134]. Thus, the moment when the second infection is acquired (2, 4 and 6 weeks post-helminth infection) would be critical for disease outcome and pathology [141]. These findings could be supported by the fact that chronicallySm-infected BALB/c mice coinfected (6 weeks) with the nonlethal strainPlasmodium yoelii NXL (PyNXL) showed high mortality. In contrast, no mortality was observed in acutely (2 or 4 weeks) coinfected mice, although they developed high parasitemia and hepatomegaly was higher in coinfected mice compared with mice infected with each parasite separately [141] (Table 3(a)). Therefore, the time of previous infection may influence the response againstPlasmodium.Together, these reports suggested that the Th2 response, induced bySchistosoma, plays an important role in protecting against immunopathology in cerebral malaria. However, the presence ofSchistosoma does not appear to modify the virulence ofPb and, consequently, it does not alter the lethality ofPlasmodium infection.Finally, one report scape to the theory that Th2-type immune response evoked by the helminth infection would possess the ability to suppress the proinflammatory Th1-type response in its host.Sm-infected A/J mice coinfected at 8 weeks withPc were protected by the presence of concomitantSm infection. The mice escaped death due to malaria; this effect was accompanied by enhanced levels of IFN-γ [142] (Table 4(a)).


## 5.2.Heligmosomoides polygyrus-Plasmodium Coinfection

Several studies used mice of the same genetic background. Additionally, equivalent helminth andPlasmodium strains have been used to explain whether previous helminthic infection plays an important role in the immune response againstPlasmodium. Su et al. showed that C57BL/6 mice previously infected withHeligmosomoides polygyrus (Hp) and challenged withPc either 3 or 5 weeks after helminthic infections developed highPc-parasitemia and mortality, which was associated with low levels of IFN-γ and high levels of TGF-β and IL-10 [143]. However,Hp-Pc coinfection at 2 weeks resulted in less severe pathology (i.e., less hypothermia and hypoglycemia) and induced earlier reticulocytosis compared with mice infected only withPc [144] (Table 4(b)).Helmby in 2009 showed that mice developed high mortality in theHp-Pc model when the two infections were introduced simultaneously. The mortality was due to severe liver pathology associated with increased IFN-γ, IL-17, and IL-22. Interestingly, when using an IFN-γ and IL-23 knockout strain, the mice survived the coinfection [145]. Thus, simultaneousHp-Pc coinfection increased mortality, which may be a consequence of a synergistic effect that increased the inflammatory response (Table 4(b)).In fact, in the first case, in whichHp-Pc coinfection was performed at 3 or 5 weeks after the initial helminthic infection, the high mortality observed may have been due to the anti-inflammatory response generated by the previous helminthic infection, which inhibited the inflammatory response necessary for control of thePlasmodium infection. However, when the coinfection was performed at the same time, mice developed a stronger inflammatory response, which generated greater pathology and mortality. This susceptibility is supported by the observation that chronic helminthic infection suppresses effective vaccine-induced protection againstPlasmodium. However, when mice were administered with antihelminthicHp treatment before malaria vaccination, the protective immunity againstPc was restored [146]. Therefore, the timing of the infection withHp plays an important role in the type of immune response that is generated within the host, and it determines the susceptibility following challenge withPlasmodium.The genetic background of mice infected with helminths has a crucial role in the outcome of the immune response toPlasmodium. For example, coinfection with the nonlethalPyNXL strain at 2 weeks afterHp infection in C57BL/6 mice resulted in exacerbated pathology and poor survival of mice. This susceptibility was associated with a reduced response againstPyNXL (i.e., low levels of IFN-γ) in the spleen cells. As a consequence, it increased the activation of Treg cells [147]. However, the same coinfection at 3 weeks in BALB/c mice decreased the pathology associated with low levels of IFN-γ and increased levels of IL-4, but not IL-10 [148]. Therefore, the genetic background of mice infected with the helminth determines the outcome ofPyNXL infection (Table 4(b)).What happens when a lethal strain ofPlasmodium was used in coinfection withHp? ThePb ANKA infection in C57BL/6 mice induced typical symptoms of ECM [160, 161]. Coinfection withHp-Pb ANKA 2 weeks after initial helminthic infection did not modify the development of ECM despite acceleratedPb growthin vivo [149]. Likewise, other results from the same model of coinfection in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice showed no differences in parasitemia, anemia, or body weight in relation to mice infected only withPlasmodium [150]. Therefore,Hp infection does not affect the outcome ofPb ANKA (Table 4(b)).


## 5.3.Echinostoma caproni-Plasmodium Coinfection

Studies in BALB/c mice infected for 3 weeks withE. caproni (Ec) and then coinfected with the nonlethal strainPyNXL showed that exacerbation ofPlasmodium-induced pathology was associated with a deficit in IFN-γ production [148]. Similarly, whenEc-infected mice were coinfected at 5 weeks, increased mortality was observed. The exacerbated pathology was reversible through the clearance ofEc worms via praziquantel treatment [151]. However, coinfection at 5 weeks with the lethalPyXL strain did not alter the course of infection; all mice infected withPyXL (i.e., alone, in combination withE. caproni, or praziquantel treated) died on day 10 after infection [151] (Table 4(c)). Therefore,Ec infection does not affect the outcome of lethalPyXL, butEc infection affects the protective response against a nonlethalPlasmodium strain.


## 5.4.Strongyloides ratti-Plasmodium Coinfection

MurineStrongyloides ratti (Sr) infection is a transient helminthic infection that is resolved spontaneously within 3-4 weeks. This infection induces a strong Th2-type immune response at day 6 after infection [135]. When BALB/c mice were coinfected with the nonlethal strainPyNXL at day 6 afterSr infection,Sr induced a slightly enhanced peak ofPlasmodium parasitemia and loss of body weight. In contrast, in C57BL/6 mice coinfected at day 6, parasitemia level and body weight were not altered. Interestingly, the Th2-type immune response induced bySr was significantly reduced uponPyNXL coinfection [152]. In addition,PyNXL clearance was not affected by previous infection withSr in either C57BL/6 or BALB/c mice. Moreover, infection withSr in BALB/c mice did not change the efficacy of vaccination againstPb ANKA [153]. Therefore, infection withSr does not affect the protective response againstPlasmodium, although it generates small changes in parasitemia levels; which is not decisive for the outcome ofPlasmodium infection (Table 4(d)).


## 5.5.Nippostrongylus brasiliensis-Plasmodium Coinfection

BALB/c mice infected withNippostrongylus brasiliensis (Nb) exhibit a strong Th2-type immune response [162]. Even so, when BALB/c mice were coinfected withNb andPc simultaneously, the Th2 response againstNb was impaired byPlasmodium. Interestingly, theNb-Pc coinfection had a beneficial effect; it slightly ameliorated the severity of malarial anemia (SMA) and decreased parasitemia levels [154]. Similarly, C57BL/6 mice infected for 3 weeks withNb and then coinfected withPb showed a delayed peak parasitemia and an increased survival time [155]. Thus, the presence of concomitantNb infection plays an important role in inhibiting pathology associated with a challenge withPc orPb (Table 4(e)).


## 5.6. Coinfection with Other Helminths

Experimental models of coinfection withLitomosoides sigmodontis (Ls) 8 weeks andPc infection in BALB/c mice showed increased SMA and weight loss associated with increased levels of IFN-γ [156]. In contrast, coinfection withLs 8 weeks andPb infection in C57BL/6 mice showed significantly reduced ECM rates associated with increased levels of IL-10. This protection was inhibited in IL-10 KO mice [157]. High levels of IL-10 were important in reducing pathology but also interfered with the protective response toPlasmodium in the liver. In particular, chronic infection withLs interfered with the protective efficacy of a vaccine against sporozoitePb in the liver [153]. Therefore, infection withLs exacerbates the pathology of aPc infection. In contrast, infection withLs inhibits pathology inPb infection due to an anti-inflammatory cytokine response (Table 4(f)).In addition, CBA/J mice infected withBrugia pahangi (Bp) for 1 week and then coinfected withPb displayed a low mortality rate, and mice were protected against the development of ECM. This protection was associated with increased serum IgE levels and Th2 cytokine production [158] (Table 4(g)). Similarly, infection withTrichinella spiralis (Ts) for 1 or 4 weeks in C57BL/6 mice greatly enhanced their resistance against the fatal coinfection withPb [159]. Therefore, these observations suggest that the Th2-type immune response reduces brain pathology and increases survival inBp- orTs-Pb coinfection, perhaps due to the anti-inflammatory environment generated by the previous helminth infection (Table 4(h)).The studies described above lead to different conclusions, while some of them suggest that prior infection with helminths induces resistance toPlasmodium [136, 137, 142, 148, 154, 155, 157–159], other studies do not show effects [149–153] and finally some others demonstrated an increased susceptibility toPlasmodium infection [138–141, 143–148, 151, 153, 156]. These contrasting results may partially be explained because this interaction is affected by the timing between the hosts’ exposure to the helminth andPlasmodium. In addition, the strain of each parasite is also important, coinfection with nonlethalPlasmodium strains in the early stages of a helminthic infection delayed the onset of parasitemia due to early, specific high production of IFN-γ, but this response increased pathology. In contrast, a significant increase in susceptibility to nonlethalPlasmodium was observed when mice were coinfected withPlasmodium in the late stages of helminthic infection, when the Th2-type immune response is predominant.Coinfection with lethal strains ofPlasmodium in the late stages of a helminthic infection inhibits severe pathology and increases the survival of mice due to a decrease inflammatory response (mainly IFN-γ and TNF-α). In addition, the presence of a late anti-inflammatory Th2-type immune response induced by helminthic infection extended the survival of mice susceptible toPlasmodium infection; this may be due to a reduced pathological Th1-type immune response or may be due to induction of protective mix of Th1 and Th2 immune response. Recruitment and activation of Mφ are essential for the clearance of malaria infections, but these have also been associated with adverse clinical outcomes [163]. Specifically, immunopathology of severe malaria is often originated from an excessive inflammatory Th1-type immune response. The expansion of Treg cells and the alternative activation of Mφ by helminth infections may modulate the excessive inflammatory response toPlasmodium. Therefore, the chronic helminth infections inhibited pathology and increased survival in the challenge with lethal strains ofPlasmodium.


## 6. Conclusions

The findings in this review demonstrate that the immune environment generated by a previous helminthic infection influences the response againstPlasmodium. A helminth that persists in its host is able to significantly modify the host’s susceptibility to or protection fromPlasmodium. These modifications are dependent on the genetic background of mice, the type of helminth, and the time-course of the initial helminthic infection, which is crucial to the resulting immune response toPlasmodium.The impact of helminth-Plasmodium coinfection on acute helminthic infection increased or synergized the Th1-type immune response. This might be successful in inducing a response that inhibitsPlasmodium replication, but it increases the pathology and mortality in the host. Alternatively, chronically helminth-infected mice showed a shift toward Th2-type immune responses. This could render the host more susceptible toPlasmodium infection and favor their replication; however, this response protected the host from severe malaria (Figure 3). Overall, these results suggest that malarial immunity is influenced by helminth infections. Therefore, the study and manipulation of antimalarial immunity seems difficult in the absence of any information concerning the effects of helminths on this response.Figure 3
Concomitant helminth infection modified the immune response and susceptibility toPlasmodium infection. Helminth parasites have developed complicated strategies to infect and successfully colonize their host. (1) In an acute helminth infection, an initial Th1-like immune response (i.e., IFN-γ, IL-12, and classical activation macrophage (CAMφ)) is associated with low parasite growth. (2) However, as the parasite colonizes the host, the immune response rapidly shifts toward a Th2-dominant response (IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13, and AAMφ) in parallel with increased helminth parasitemia. (3) This “immune environment” determined by helminth infection modifies the immune response and the susceptibility toPlasmodium. That is, acutely helminth-infected mice exhibited (2) decreased transmission ofPlasmodium (2.1), decreased parasitemia and increased survival (2.2) due to high levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α in the early stage. However, this immune response increased mortality during the chronic stage of malaria (2.3) and increased severe pathology, such as ECM and severe malaria anemia (SMA) (2.4). In contrast, chronically helminth-infected mice (3) increased the transmission ofPlasmodium (3.1), parasitemia and mortality (3.2) due to high levels of IL-4, IL-10, and TGF-β and low levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α. However, during the course of the coinfection, the Th1 response againstPlasmodium was increased. In fact, a mixed Th1/Th2 response during the chronic stage induced low levels of parasitemia and was asymptomatic (3.3). Interestingly, chronic helminth infections inhibited severe pathologies caused byPlasmodium, such as ECM and SMA (3.4), and increased the survival due to a decreased inflammatory response. Abbreviations:Schistosoma mansoni (Sm),Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Hp),Echinostoma caproni (Ec),Strongyloides ratti (Sr),Nippostrongylus brasiliensis (Nb),Litomosoides sigmodontis (Ls),Brugia pahangi (Bp), andTrichinella spiralis (Ts).


## 7. Perspectives

The helminth-Plasmodium interaction may have undesirable implications for global public health; for example, malaria vaccines trials do not consider the immune response to helminths, and this could result in decreased performance or cause adverse effects. Thus, a better understanding of helminth-induced regulation in the antimalarial response is indispensable for the rational development of effective antimalarial vaccines and novel therapies to alleviate or prevent the symptoms of severe malaria. The risk that entire populations may have an increased susceptibility toPlasmodium should invite study regarding the possible epidemiological relevance of helminth infections and the impact of controlling them on malaria incidence. The presence of helminth infections could represent a much more important challenge for public health than previously recognized. Therefore, we would emphasize that it is extremely important to carry out experiments in animal models that use more rigorous criteria to define exhaustively all the ramifications of immune regulation and potential side effects of helminth infection in the context of malaria. These results would allow extrapolate the observation in human populations presenting malaria.



---

*Source: 913696-2014-09-08.xml*