# Kaluza-Klein State in Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy Cycles

Authors: Thiago Prudêncio
Journal: Advances in Mathematical Physics
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

A Kaluza-Klein state configuration in black-hole qubit correspondence (BHQC) is considered in cyclic cycles of its Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. After a sequence of Peccei-Quinn transformations on the Kaluza-Klein state in cyclic cycles alternating between large and small extremal black hole (EBH) configurations, we obtain the corresponding amount of variation in the initial Bekenstein-Hawking entropy in cyclic cycles. We consider different cases where the EBH state alternates between small and large states. We then demonstrate that the total Bekenstein-Hawking entropy increases in these processes.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

An important class of extremal black holes (EBHs) is the special cases of black holes that cease evaporation due the presence of supersymmetric bounds [1–3]. The consequence of the bounds is to create a relation between the mass of the EBHs and their electric and magnetic charges [4, 5]. In the final state, the EBH can be described completely by their magnetic and electric charges and consequently is independent of the scalar fields that describe the nonstationary states [2]. A consequence is that a mapping with a Hilbert space can be done with the symmetries mapped on classes of entanglement, as a black hole qubit correspondence (BHQC) [6–9].In recent years the BHQC of EBHs have been studied relating the entanglement classes with groups associated with string theories that lead to a description of the stationary states of EBHs, when the Hawking radiation is stopped and the state of the EBH is described completely in terms of their electric and magnetic charges [1].Different configurations of EBH have been classified and the BHQC allows the classification of different configurations according to the entanglement class the EBH belongs. In particular, the association with qubits and the realization of quantum information protocols. An important advance in this field is the BHQC connection with quantum circuit protocols [10].Recently these class of operations on a EBH state where investigated by means of Peccei-Quinn (PQ) transformations [11]. These classes of operations on an EBH state can be associated on a BHQC to operators that does not change the magnetic charges of an EBH state. These transformations produce changes in the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy [12, 13].Here we investigate the class of Kaluza-Klein EBHs under the action of PQ operators in cycles alternating between large and small EBH configurations associated with their Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. The cases analyzed are transitions at fixed entropy and transitions at increasing or decreasing entropy. We consider different possible combinations where we finally compute the total amount of entropy exchange in the cycles. In the BHQC scenario this means it evolves as a set of gate operations applied in such a way to achieve cycles in EBH state configuration.The paper is organized as follows: in Sections2 and 3, some aspects of BHQC that will be applied in the next sections are revised; in Section 4, the relation between Bekenstein-Hawking entropy and the G4-invariant is discussed; in Section 5 the Kaluza-Klein (KK) state configurations in small and large configurations of EBH are discussed; in Section 6, operations on EBH charge states are discussed; in Section 7, the protocols of cyclic cycles of Bekenstein-Hawking entropy in KK EBH configurations are implemented; in Section 8, conclusions remarks are addressed.


## 2. BHQC

BHQC has been established a bridge between certain solutions of black holes and quantum information theory (QIT). This correspondence allows the problem of classification of EBHs be associated with the classification of entanglement classes in QIT systems. The Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is in a class of black hole solutions in string theory and classes of multipartite entanglement measures associated in BHQC. The correspondence can also shed new light on the way EBHs evolve under certain QIT conditions [6, 10].


## 3. BHQC States

In the BHQC realization, a general dyonic charge vector state is given by the superposition of type(1)Q≔p00+q01+∑i=1npi2i+∑i=1nqi2i+1,where a Fock basis is used {i,i=0,…,n} as the symplectic basis of the Hilbert space associated with the electric and magnetic charges of the EBH. For convenience, the even states are associated with the magnetic charge configurations and the odd states to the electric charge configurations of the EBH. The dimension n is associated with the number of vector multiplets n=nV.A BHQC of Peccei-Quinn (PQ) symplectic transformation on the charge state is given by the action of the corresponding operatorO^PQ on the charge state being given by QPQ=O^PQQ and has the following explicit expression:(2)QPQ=p00+q0+ρp0+∑i=1ncipi1+∑i=1npi2i+∑i=1nqi+cip0+∑j=1npjΘji2i+1,where the coefficients allows to a Peccei-Quinn group, PQn+1 [11], whose invariants are of the form(3)W=In+10n+1ϱcjciΘijIn+1∈PQn+1,with In+1 the identity and 0n+1 the null (n+1)×(n+1) matrices, where the submatrices with ϱ,ci,Θij are defined as a (n+1)×(n+1) real matrix (i,j=1,…,n, Θij=Θij).As a consequence, PQ operators leave the EBH magnetic charges invariant,(4)p0→p0,(5)pi→pi,while changing the electric charges(6)q0→q0+ρp0+∑i=1ncipi,(7)qi→qi+cip0+∑j=1npjΘji.


## 4. Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy and theG4-Invariant

A general EBH charge state configuration (1) is associated with a unique G4-invariant:(8)I4Q=-p0q0+∑i=1npiqi2+4q0I3p-4p0I3q+4I3p,I3q, where the cubic invariants are given by(9)I3p=13!∑i,j,k=1ndijkpipjpk,(10)I3q=13!∑i,j,k=1ndijkqiqjqk, and the Poisson brackets are defined as(11)I3p,I3q=∑i=1n∂I3p∂pi∂I3q∂qiThe Bekenstein-Hawking entropy formula for a general EBH state is given in terms of this invariant as [6](12)SQ=πI4Q.


## 5. Large and Small Kaluza-Klein EBH Configurations

We say that the EBH configuration is large if(13)SQ≠0 and the EBH is small if instead(14)SQ=0. An important type of EBH configuration particularly to BHQC due to the form correspondence with a qubit is a Kaluza-Klein EBH configuration.A Kaluza-Klein (KK) EBH state configuration is given by the following state in BHQC:(15)QKK=p00+q01 The KK invariant is given by(16)I4QKK=-p02q02<0, where(17)∂I3q∂qi=0,∂I3p∂pi=0,∀i. It follows that the Bekenstein-Hawking formula for a general EBH configuration of a Kaluza-Klein type is(18)SQKK=πp0q0. In the case with both p0 and q0 nonvanishing, one obtains a dyonic large EBH configuration, corresponding to the maximal rank=4 element in the related Freudenthal Triple System [11].If some ofp0 or q0 vanish, one has a small EBH configuration, since in this case(19)SQKK=0. These cases are given by corresponding pure states p00 and q01.


## 6. Operations on EBH Charge States

After a PQ transformation, the Kaluza-Klein state dyonic EBH state acquires a superposition of change states(20)p0→p′0=p0≠0,(21)pi=0→p′i=0(22)q0→q0′=q0+ρp0+∑i=1ncipi≠0,(23)qi=0→qi′=cip0≠0. This will alter the Bekenstein-Hawking EBH entropy. The state is written(24)QPQKK=p00+q0+ρp01+∑i=1np0ci2i+1. And the invariants are given by(25)I3p=0,(26)I3q=p033!∑i,j,k=1ndijkcicjck,(27)I3p,I3q=0.(28)I4Q=-p0q0+ρp022-2p043∑i,j,k=1ndijkcicjck, We can define the constant of the PQ transformation(29)λ=∑i,j,k=1ndijkcicjck, such that the quartic invariant is given by(30)I4Q=-q02p02-2ρq0p03-ρ2-2λ3p04,Consequently, the Bekestein-Hawking entropy is written in the form(31)SQ=p0q02+2ρq0p0+ρ2-2λ3p02 A large EBH is achieved for S(Q)≠0, while the set of small EBHs after the transformation satisfy S(Q)=0; consequently(32)q02+2ρq0p0+ρ2-2λ3p02=0. In this case, two possible solutions are found(33)p+0=-q0ρ-2λ/3,(34)p-0=-q0ρ+2λ/3.


## 7. Cyclic Cycles of Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy in Kaluza-Klein EBH Configurations

In order to consider a cyclic cycle of Kaluza-Klein EBH states, we consider a set of PQ operations as a BHQC quantum circuit in different protocols alternating small and large EBH configurations.


### 7.1. Alternating Small and Large Kaluza-Klein EBH Configurations

We consider the interchange between large and small Kaluza-Klein EBH configurations obeying the following protocol (see Figure1):(35)SQ1≠0→SQ2=0(36)SQ2=0→SQ3≠0(37)SQ3≠0→SQ4=0(38)SQ4=0→SQ5=SQ1 We start with a Kaluza-Klein state(39)Q1=QKK=p00+q01, where p0>0 and q0>0, whose Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is given by(40)SQ1=πp0q0. The PQ symplectic transformation on this EBH configuration will lead to(41)QPQKK=p00+q0+ρ1p01+∑i=1nci,1p02i+1.We can consider the case where the transformation leaves the configuration in a Kaluza-Klein state but converts the EBH in a small configuration. This will occur under the condition(42)ci,1=0,i=1,…,n.(43)ρ1=-q0p0 Consequently, we will have(44)Q2=QPQ1=p00, which is small(45)SQ2=0. The second transformation will leave the state in the following charge configuration:(46)QPQ2=p00+ρ2p01+∑i=1nci,2p02i+1 where the simplest case is taken(47)ρ2>0(48)ci,2=0 and again we put the state in a Kaluza-Klein configuration(49)Q3=p00+ρ2p01This is then a large EBH with a Bekenstein-Hawking entropy given by(50)SQ3=πp02ρ2. Again, we apply a PQ symplectic transformation on this EBH configuration, and we are left in the following state:(51)QPQ3=p00+ρ2+ρ3p01+∑i=1nci,3p02i+1, We now have that the small configuration implies(52)ρ3=-ρ2,(53)ci,3=0. And the state(54)Q4=QPQ3=p00, that is, a small EBH configuration Q4=Q2(55)SQ4=0. Finally, the cyclic transformation is achieved by the transformation(56)QPQ4=p00+ρ4p01+∑i=1nci,4p02i+1 where we keep the Kaluza-Klein configuration with(57)ci,4=0, and(58)Q5=QPQ4=p00+ρ4p01(59)SQ5=πρ4p02. The condition(60)Q5=Q1 will lead to(61)ρ4=q0p0=-ρ1. The whole cyclic transformation is then realized under the conditions(62)ci,k=0,k=1,…,4,i=1,…,n(63)ρ2+ρ3=0,(64)ρ1+ρ4=0. In this case the Kaluza-Klein EBH states are alternating between large and small configurations.Figure 1
Cycle with alternating small and large EBH configurations.The set of variations of Bekenstein-Hawking entropies in each step are given by(65)ΔS21=πp0q0(66)ΔS32=πp02ρ2(67)ΔS43=-πp02ρ2(68)ΔS54=πp02ρ4 It follows that the whole process has a total increasing entropy(69)ΔS=πp0q0+πp02ρ4. Considering a more general scenario where the final configuration is given by(70)ρ4=αq0p0 we have the total entropy in the process given by(71)ΔS=πp0q01+α. It follows that, after N cycles, the entropy will suffer the total variation obeying the following relation:(72)ΔS=πp0q01+∑k=1Nαk, where αk is the proportionality of last cycle step in each cycle. The perfect case is αk=1,(73)ΔS=πp0q0N+1.


### 7.2. Cycle with Sections of Small and Large EBH Configurations

We can also consider the following protocol (see Figure2):(74)SQ1≠0,(75)SQ2≠0,(76)SQ3=0,(77)SQ4=0,(78)SQ5=SQ1, where now the operation does not change the entropy. Starting again with the Kaluza-Klein state(79)Q1=QKK=p00+q01, with p0>0 and q0>0, whose Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is given by(80)SQ1=πp0q0. The PQ transformation will lead to(81)QPQ1=p00+q0+ρ1p01+∑i=1nci,1p02i+1 Staying in a Kaluza-Klein configuration implies that(82)ci,1=0, which will lead to the following state(83)Q2=p00+q0+ρ1p01 In this case, the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is given by(84)SQ2=πp0q0+ρ1p0 Taking the case q0>0,ρ1>0,p0>0, we can write(85)SQ2=SQ1+πρ1p02 The PQ transformation on this state will now lead to the following:(86)QPQ2=p00+q0+ρ1p0+ρ2p01+∑i=1nci,2p02i+1 In this case, we have the relations(87)ρ1=ρ2=-q0p0(88)ci,2=0 such that the Kaluza-Klein state is reduced to(89)Q3=p00, and the EBH has a small configuration(90)SQ3=0. We then have the next transformation(91)QPQ3=p00+ρ3p01+∑i=1nci,3p02i+1. Since in this case we also have a small EBH configuration,(92)ρ3=0,(93)ci,3=0. This will lead to the EBH state(94)Q4=p00. This is finally after the transformation(95)QPQ4=p00+ρ4p01+∑i=1nci,4p02i+1, whocj will lead to(96)ci,4=0 and we have(97)Q5=p00+ρ4p01, The Bekenstein-Hawking entropy in this case is(98)SQ5=πρ4p02 The cyclic condition imposes the relation(99)ρ4=q0p0. The variations of Bekenstein-Hawking entropy in each step are given by(100)ΔS21=πρ1p02(101)ΔS32=-πρ1p02(102)ΔS43=0(103)ΔS54=πp02ρ4 The total entropy variation is given by(104)ΔS=πp02ρ4, and consequently it has increased.Figure 2
Cycle with sections of fixed large and small EBH configurations.In a more general case(105)ρ4=αq0p0. This leads to(106)ΔS=απp0q0 In N cycles, the total entropy variation is given by(107)ΔS=∑k=1Nπαkp0q0 In particular, for αk=1,(108)ΔS=πNp0q0. The Bekenstein-Hawking entropy after N cycles is then an increasing quantity.


## 7.1. Alternating Small and Large Kaluza-Klein EBH Configurations

We consider the interchange between large and small Kaluza-Klein EBH configurations obeying the following protocol (see Figure1):(35)SQ1≠0→SQ2=0(36)SQ2=0→SQ3≠0(37)SQ3≠0→SQ4=0(38)SQ4=0→SQ5=SQ1 We start with a Kaluza-Klein state(39)Q1=QKK=p00+q01, where p0>0 and q0>0, whose Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is given by(40)SQ1=πp0q0. The PQ symplectic transformation on this EBH configuration will lead to(41)QPQKK=p00+q0+ρ1p01+∑i=1nci,1p02i+1.We can consider the case where the transformation leaves the configuration in a Kaluza-Klein state but converts the EBH in a small configuration. This will occur under the condition(42)ci,1=0,i=1,…,n.(43)ρ1=-q0p0 Consequently, we will have(44)Q2=QPQ1=p00, which is small(45)SQ2=0. The second transformation will leave the state in the following charge configuration:(46)QPQ2=p00+ρ2p01+∑i=1nci,2p02i+1 where the simplest case is taken(47)ρ2>0(48)ci,2=0 and again we put the state in a Kaluza-Klein configuration(49)Q3=p00+ρ2p01This is then a large EBH with a Bekenstein-Hawking entropy given by(50)SQ3=πp02ρ2. Again, we apply a PQ symplectic transformation on this EBH configuration, and we are left in the following state:(51)QPQ3=p00+ρ2+ρ3p01+∑i=1nci,3p02i+1, We now have that the small configuration implies(52)ρ3=-ρ2,(53)ci,3=0. And the state(54)Q4=QPQ3=p00, that is, a small EBH configuration Q4=Q2(55)SQ4=0. Finally, the cyclic transformation is achieved by the transformation(56)QPQ4=p00+ρ4p01+∑i=1nci,4p02i+1 where we keep the Kaluza-Klein configuration with(57)ci,4=0, and(58)Q5=QPQ4=p00+ρ4p01(59)SQ5=πρ4p02. The condition(60)Q5=Q1 will lead to(61)ρ4=q0p0=-ρ1. The whole cyclic transformation is then realized under the conditions(62)ci,k=0,k=1,…,4,i=1,…,n(63)ρ2+ρ3=0,(64)ρ1+ρ4=0. In this case the Kaluza-Klein EBH states are alternating between large and small configurations.Figure 1
Cycle with alternating small and large EBH configurations.The set of variations of Bekenstein-Hawking entropies in each step are given by(65)ΔS21=πp0q0(66)ΔS32=πp02ρ2(67)ΔS43=-πp02ρ2(68)ΔS54=πp02ρ4 It follows that the whole process has a total increasing entropy(69)ΔS=πp0q0+πp02ρ4. Considering a more general scenario where the final configuration is given by(70)ρ4=αq0p0 we have the total entropy in the process given by(71)ΔS=πp0q01+α. It follows that, after N cycles, the entropy will suffer the total variation obeying the following relation:(72)ΔS=πp0q01+∑k=1Nαk, where αk is the proportionality of last cycle step in each cycle. The perfect case is αk=1,(73)ΔS=πp0q0N+1.


## 7.2. Cycle with Sections of Small and Large EBH Configurations

We can also consider the following protocol (see Figure2):(74)SQ1≠0,(75)SQ2≠0,(76)SQ3=0,(77)SQ4=0,(78)SQ5=SQ1, where now the operation does not change the entropy. Starting again with the Kaluza-Klein state(79)Q1=QKK=p00+q01, with p0>0 and q0>0, whose Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is given by(80)SQ1=πp0q0. The PQ transformation will lead to(81)QPQ1=p00+q0+ρ1p01+∑i=1nci,1p02i+1 Staying in a Kaluza-Klein configuration implies that(82)ci,1=0, which will lead to the following state(83)Q2=p00+q0+ρ1p01 In this case, the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is given by(84)SQ2=πp0q0+ρ1p0 Taking the case q0>0,ρ1>0,p0>0, we can write(85)SQ2=SQ1+πρ1p02 The PQ transformation on this state will now lead to the following:(86)QPQ2=p00+q0+ρ1p0+ρ2p01+∑i=1nci,2p02i+1 In this case, we have the relations(87)ρ1=ρ2=-q0p0(88)ci,2=0 such that the Kaluza-Klein state is reduced to(89)Q3=p00, and the EBH has a small configuration(90)SQ3=0. We then have the next transformation(91)QPQ3=p00+ρ3p01+∑i=1nci,3p02i+1. Since in this case we also have a small EBH configuration,(92)ρ3=0,(93)ci,3=0. This will lead to the EBH state(94)Q4=p00. This is finally after the transformation(95)QPQ4=p00+ρ4p01+∑i=1nci,4p02i+1, whocj will lead to(96)ci,4=0 and we have(97)Q5=p00+ρ4p01, The Bekenstein-Hawking entropy in this case is(98)SQ5=πρ4p02 The cyclic condition imposes the relation(99)ρ4=q0p0. The variations of Bekenstein-Hawking entropy in each step are given by(100)ΔS21=πρ1p02(101)ΔS32=-πρ1p02(102)ΔS43=0(103)ΔS54=πp02ρ4 The total entropy variation is given by(104)ΔS=πp02ρ4, and consequently it has increased.Figure 2
Cycle with sections of fixed large and small EBH configurations.In a more general case(105)ρ4=αq0p0. This leads to(106)ΔS=απp0q0 In N cycles, the total entropy variation is given by(107)ΔS=∑k=1Nπαkp0q0 In particular, for αk=1,(108)ΔS=πNp0q0. The Bekenstein-Hawking entropy after N cycles is then an increasing quantity.


## 8. Concluding Remarks

Within the black-hole/qubit correspondence (BHQC), we considered the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy variation in cyclic cycles, where Peccei–Quinn (PQ) symplectic transformations are used on the transitions between EBH state configurations. We considered the cases where the entropy is alternating between small and large configurations and the situation where the transitions occur in fixed small or large configurations. We showed applying BHQC that the total Bekenstein-Hawking entropy in each state increases. This is in complete agreement with area theorem [12, 14]. As a consequence, the cyclic transport of a qubit like state in BHQC leads to an increasing variation of the corresponding total Bekenstein-Hawking entropy.As a consequence, a sequence of gate operations in a KK state in a cyclic cycle with the initial state as a target state implies increasing of the total Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, in agreement with the expected in the thermodynamics of black holes, implying that such a scenario can be implemented physically under a cost of increasing entropy.



---

*Source: 9051968-2019-02-03.xml*