# The Application of Machine Learning Models in Network Protocol Vulnerability Mining

Authors: Tieming Liu
Journal: Security and Communication Networks
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

With the development of society, humans are becoming more and more dependent on the Internet. And there are exploitable vulnerabilities in network sharing protocol vulnerabilities that will cause great risks to individuals and society. Therefore, vulnerability mining technology has developed into an important research problem in the field of information security. To this end, this paper uses fuzzy testing method for vulnerability mining of network protocols. The fuzzy testing technique performs vulnerability mining by sending a large amount of abnormal data to the test target and monitoring whether the software system is working properly. The vulnerability mining approach in this paper prioritizes the need to analyze and model the protocol format and generate a large number of test cases by using fuzzy test values to vary the boundaries of different parts of the protocol. These test cases are then sent to the test target, and the network state and process state of the test target are monitored in real time. Finally, if the test cases trigger a vulnerability, the system automatically records the test case information as well as the vulnerability information. The test cases evaluated by machine learning as easy to trigger vulnerabilities are sent to the test H-target, which can save the time of vulnerability mining for everyone and improve the efficiency of vulnerability mining. The vulnerability mining technology researched in this paper is of great significance to network security, which can prevent problems before they occur, discover vulnerabilities in the network in time, take effective measures to prevent them, and possibly avoid the spread of some major network vulnerability viruses.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

As society evolves, human reliance on the Internet is growing. Online banking, stock market trading, and automated military and government facilities rely heavily on Internet-based software systems [1]. Therefore, the risk to society of having exploitable vulnerabilities in automated software systems is enormous, and the security and privacy issues arising from software vulnerabilities are gaining increasing attention [2].Despite the risks, people are willing to take the risk of using the Internet because it has created a huge virtual marketplace that makes transactions and life more efficient [3]. Although network security is gaining attention and researchers are making great progress in secure coding, a completely secure system is not possible to achieve a garden at any time. On this basis, network vulnerability mining research has received attention as soon as it emerged, and can largely protect our network security, to prevent problems before they occur. With the development of more and more complex software systems, software systems have more and more defects [4]. Therefore, whether it is open source or proprietary software, the number of security flaws continues to grow [5].In the computer, security knowledge is extremely poor. Morris virus exploits the Unix system; some function calls of the goodness repeatedly infected a large number of computers, the worm to have a very strong infection and difficult to prevent. For example, the Code Red worm used the buffer overflow vulnerability of the HTTP protocol server to send a large number of GET requests to port 80 to gain access to control the infected computer, and the virus greatly endangered the interests of computer users, causing great economic losses [6–10]. In 2003, the Shockwave worm exploited the vulnerability of the Microsoft Remote Call Protocol RPC. In three days, the virus infected one million computers and caused computer systems to crash. The virus brought awareness to the importance of network security. Unlike before, the Stuxnet virus took advantage of a vulnerability in the industrial network control protocol to infect industrial SCADA systems and gain access to write code to the system, thus damaging the industrial network [11]. There is also a computer virus called “Eternal Blue” exploiting the Windows system remote call protocol 445 port vulnerability (MSl7-010) to ravage the world, within a few days of the country, and the region’s computers were attacked. Hackers used the vulnerability to encrypt users’ files and extort them, giving hundreds of millions of users worldwide. In short, software vulnerabilities can be defined as software flaws or weaknesses in software systems that can be exploited by malicious users and can cause immeasurable damage. To completely eliminate is almost impossible. These vulnerabilities are of great concern because they provide the attacker with the ability to completely control the system or leak highly sensitive information [12].In view of the increasingly serious network security situation, the vulnerability mining technology studied in this paper is of great significance for network security, which can prevent problems before they occur, discover vulnerabilities in the network in a timely manner, take effective measures to prevent them, and possibly avoid the spread of some major network vulnerability viruses [13–15].


## 2. Sample Protocol Vulnerability Acquisition

### 2.1. Obtain Training Samples from AFL

Before training the learning model, the acquisition of training samples is also required. In the use case preference method described in this section, a complete training sample includes seed test cases, mutated test cases, and the validity of the execution results of the mutated test cases in the target under test [16]. The seed test cases and the mutated test cases are used to form the input vector for the variational approach to the model, while the validity of the execution results is used as the output of the model. Since the final validity probability results can be classified into valid and invalid use cases by the validity threshold, the machine learning model training problem in the later section can be transformed into a class binary classification problem. The dichotomous classification problem usually obtains a model by training positive and negative samples. Therefore, in the class binary classification problem of this paper, the valid test cases mutated by the seed cases can be regarded as positive samples, and the invalid test cases mutated by the seed cases can be regarded as negative samples. The positive samples described later are the valid test cases, and the negative samples are the invalid test cases [17].Since the AFL fuzzy testing tool is used by file format as input, before vulnerability mining of network protocols, in order to simplify the validation of the use case preference method in this section, software with file format as input is used as the validation object in this section. TIFF is a widely used format for storing image data. Considering that the TIFF format is similar to a network protocol message and its text format conforms to some inherent rules, this section uses Libtiff [18] to obtain a collection of samples. Libtiff software provides various conversion tools for the Tagged Image File Format (TIFF).In this paper, we use the AFL combined with the target under test for fuzzy testing to obtain training samples for machine learning models. As shown in Figure1, the basic process of fuzzy testing by AFL with Libtiff as the target under test is as follows.(1)
Compile Libtiff, the target under test, using AFL’s compiler for stacking.(2)
Run the target under test using AFL, and the target under test is executed as a child of the AFL process.(3)
AFL reads the seed use case and mutates it according to the compilation policy.(4)
AFL pipes the mutated test cases to the child process Libtiff.(5)
The child process executes the test cases and provides feedback on the execution results.(6)
AFL saves the execution results and valid cases and repeats the execution process (3) (4) (5) (6).Figure 1
AFL fuzzy test flow.It can be seen that AFL only keeps some of the valid test cases, while training the model requires negative samples in addition to positive ones. In addition, since we define the input of the model as a vector of variants, we also need to save the seed cases corresponding to the test cases. Therefore, in order to get the training samples, we need to modify the AFL source code to save the seed cases as files before AFL performs the mutation operation on the seed cases, and to save the corresponding test cases according to the validity classification after the test cases are executed and the validity results are obtained [19].


### 2.2. Training Sample Preprocessing

Due to the violent and random nature of variation in fuzzy testing, a large number of test cases mutated by AFL based on the seed cases are invalid, and there are few test cases that can cause the target under test to crash, time out, and execute new code paths. This results in a mismatch between the number of positive and negative samples in the training sample [20].Considering the problem of small number of valid use cases, this paper uses a combination of full oversampling and random undersampling to retain all positive samples obtained by fuzzy testing in the process of matching the number of positive and negative samples, selects a number matching coefficient based on the difference between the total number of positive and negative samples, then obtains the number of negative samples from the number matching coefficient and the number of positive samples, and selects negative samples in the corresponding set of negative samples. The number of negative samples is randomly selected from the corresponding set of negative samples, and the set of number matching training samples is finally obtained.The set of seed cases isZ, and the number of elements of the set is t. Then,(1)Z=z1,z2,z3,…,zt.According to the variation rule of AFL, each seed use case zi corresponds to a positive sample setOi and a negative sample set Ni, and let the number of positive sample sets be mi and the number of negative sample sets be li, then(2)Oi=oi1,oi2,oi3,…,oimi,Ni=ni1,ni2,ni3,…,oili.Before data matching, the total number of positive sample setsO and sub-sample sets N is M and L, respectively:(3)M=∑i=0tmi,L=∑i=0tli.Then, a number matching factor is selected based on the total number of positive and negative samplesϕ:(4)ϕ=fM,N.If the difference between the total number of positive and negative samples is larger, then the value ofϕ will be larger. However, in order to balance the positive and negative samples, the number matching factor ϕ does not exceed 10.Next, the positive samples are oversampled. First, all positive samples are selected to form a positive sample training set, and then each element of the combined positive sample set is copied according to the number matching coefficientϕ to obtain the complete positive sample set O.(5)O=O11∪O12∪O1ϕ∪O21∪O22∪O2ϕ∪Ot1∪Ot2∪Otϕ.where Oij is the j-th replica set of Oi.As the number of positive samples ismi for each seed case and the number matching factor is ϕ, ϕmi negative samples need to be randomly sampled in each negative sample set to obtain the complete set of subsamples N:(6)N=N1′∪N2′∪N3′∪⋯∪Nt′.where Ni is the set of negative samples from the i-th seed case after random sampling and the number of use cases in the set is ϕmi. After the above sample processing, a balanced set of training samples can be obtained.


## 2.1. Obtain Training Samples from AFL

Before training the learning model, the acquisition of training samples is also required. In the use case preference method described in this section, a complete training sample includes seed test cases, mutated test cases, and the validity of the execution results of the mutated test cases in the target under test [16]. The seed test cases and the mutated test cases are used to form the input vector for the variational approach to the model, while the validity of the execution results is used as the output of the model. Since the final validity probability results can be classified into valid and invalid use cases by the validity threshold, the machine learning model training problem in the later section can be transformed into a class binary classification problem. The dichotomous classification problem usually obtains a model by training positive and negative samples. Therefore, in the class binary classification problem of this paper, the valid test cases mutated by the seed cases can be regarded as positive samples, and the invalid test cases mutated by the seed cases can be regarded as negative samples. The positive samples described later are the valid test cases, and the negative samples are the invalid test cases [17].Since the AFL fuzzy testing tool is used by file format as input, before vulnerability mining of network protocols, in order to simplify the validation of the use case preference method in this section, software with file format as input is used as the validation object in this section. TIFF is a widely used format for storing image data. Considering that the TIFF format is similar to a network protocol message and its text format conforms to some inherent rules, this section uses Libtiff [18] to obtain a collection of samples. Libtiff software provides various conversion tools for the Tagged Image File Format (TIFF).In this paper, we use the AFL combined with the target under test for fuzzy testing to obtain training samples for machine learning models. As shown in Figure1, the basic process of fuzzy testing by AFL with Libtiff as the target under test is as follows.(1)
Compile Libtiff, the target under test, using AFL’s compiler for stacking.(2)
Run the target under test using AFL, and the target under test is executed as a child of the AFL process.(3)
AFL reads the seed use case and mutates it according to the compilation policy.(4)
AFL pipes the mutated test cases to the child process Libtiff.(5)
The child process executes the test cases and provides feedback on the execution results.(6)
AFL saves the execution results and valid cases and repeats the execution process (3) (4) (5) (6).Figure 1
AFL fuzzy test flow.It can be seen that AFL only keeps some of the valid test cases, while training the model requires negative samples in addition to positive ones. In addition, since we define the input of the model as a vector of variants, we also need to save the seed cases corresponding to the test cases. Therefore, in order to get the training samples, we need to modify the AFL source code to save the seed cases as files before AFL performs the mutation operation on the seed cases, and to save the corresponding test cases according to the validity classification after the test cases are executed and the validity results are obtained [19].


## 2.2. Training Sample Preprocessing

Due to the violent and random nature of variation in fuzzy testing, a large number of test cases mutated by AFL based on the seed cases are invalid, and there are few test cases that can cause the target under test to crash, time out, and execute new code paths. This results in a mismatch between the number of positive and negative samples in the training sample [20].Considering the problem of small number of valid use cases, this paper uses a combination of full oversampling and random undersampling to retain all positive samples obtained by fuzzy testing in the process of matching the number of positive and negative samples, selects a number matching coefficient based on the difference between the total number of positive and negative samples, then obtains the number of negative samples from the number matching coefficient and the number of positive samples, and selects negative samples in the corresponding set of negative samples. The number of negative samples is randomly selected from the corresponding set of negative samples, and the set of number matching training samples is finally obtained.The set of seed cases isZ, and the number of elements of the set is t. Then,(1)Z=z1,z2,z3,…,zt.According to the variation rule of AFL, each seed use case zi corresponds to a positive sample setOi and a negative sample set Ni, and let the number of positive sample sets be mi and the number of negative sample sets be li, then(2)Oi=oi1,oi2,oi3,…,oimi,Ni=ni1,ni2,ni3,…,oili.Before data matching, the total number of positive sample setsO and sub-sample sets N is M and L, respectively:(3)M=∑i=0tmi,L=∑i=0tli.Then, a number matching factor is selected based on the total number of positive and negative samplesϕ:(4)ϕ=fM,N.If the difference between the total number of positive and negative samples is larger, then the value ofϕ will be larger. However, in order to balance the positive and negative samples, the number matching factor ϕ does not exceed 10.Next, the positive samples are oversampled. First, all positive samples are selected to form a positive sample training set, and then each element of the combined positive sample set is copied according to the number matching coefficientϕ to obtain the complete positive sample set O.(5)O=O11∪O12∪O1ϕ∪O21∪O22∪O2ϕ∪Ot1∪Ot2∪Otϕ.where Oij is the j-th replica set of Oi.As the number of positive samples ismi for each seed case and the number matching factor is ϕ, ϕmi negative samples need to be randomly sampled in each negative sample set to obtain the complete set of subsamples N:(6)N=N1′∪N2′∪N3′∪⋯∪Nt′.where Ni is the set of negative samples from the i-th seed case after random sampling and the number of use cases in the set is ϕmi. After the above sample processing, a balanced set of training samples can be obtained.


## 3. Network Protocol Fuzzy Test System

### 3.1. Fuzzy Testing Algorithm Design

As mentioned earlier, the original AFL fuzzy testing tool randomly and violently mutates a large number of fuzzy test cases based on the seed cases and then feeds all these test cases into the subject for fuzzy testing. This leads to the problem that the subject executes a large number of test cases, but only finds a very small number of valid test cases. In order to test out the rare vulnerabilities, the execution cost of the subject under test is huge.To solve the problem of costly execution of the subject under test, this section designs a fuzzy testing algorithm based on a combination of deep learning test case preference methods that use neural networks to prefer test cases generated in the fuzzy testing process. This algorithm is able to optimize the use case generation session during fuzzy testing in a generalized, automated manner, avoiding the acquisition of protocol prior knowledge.The core idea of the algorithm is to input the test cases from the fuzzy test tool into the neural network model trained for the protocol object of the network under test for prediction, then to include the cases that are judged as valid by the neural network model as the preferred cases, while the cases that are judged as invalid are directly discarded, and then to use the preferred cases for the protocol object under test for further fuzzy test. In this way, the selection of message cases can be performed by the neural network model, and the proportion of vulnerabilities in the tested network protocol objects will be much larger than that of the message cases generated by the traditional fuzzy test tool.The algorithm optimizes the testing process of the AFL fuzzy testing tool in the following way.(1)
Take a seeds from the given set of seed use cases and mutate the seed use cases using different mutation algorithms.(2)
Based on the obtained mutation test case, compute the mutation vector of the mutation.(3)
Predicting the validity of this mutation mode vector using a use case preference method.(4)
Putting the predicted valid test case into the protocol object under test for execution and monitoring the execution results.(5)
If a crash, timeout, or new code path is caused in the protocol object under test, the test case is added to the final set of valid use case outputs.


### 3.2. Fuzzy Testing System Framework Design

Based on the above core algorithm, this paper designs a fuzzy test system as shown in Figure2, which contains four main modules, and the use process is divided into training phase and use phase:(1)
Use case selection module: This module contains the deep learning model implementation of the use case selection method in the previous chapter and is mainly responsible for the validity prediction of the input message use cases. In the training phase, this module uses the test cases generated by the AFL fuzzy test tool for model training; in the usage phase, the model receives the test case output from the AFL fuzzy test tool module and performs validity prediction for the cases, so as to filter invalid cases and return the validity determination results of the cases to the AFL fuzzy test tool module.(2)
AFL fuzzy tester module: This module contains the improved AFL tool, which is mainly responsible for variation generation of test cases and detection of the results of the variation cases in the object under test. In this system, each test case is a variant message input to the protocol under test. In the training phase of the neural network, this module is used to mutate a large number of test cases, each of which contains the test message and the execution result of the message in the protocol under test; in the usage phase, this module mutates the test message cases, inputs them to the case selection module for prediction, and then puts the predicted valid messages into the protocol under test for execution and detection.(3)
Network protocol adapter module: This module is mainly used to accept test case input from AFL to the network protocol module under test and send the test cases to the network protocol module under test for execution by receiving the input from the network protocol module under test. Since different network protocol modules under test have different input methods, such as socket method, this module is used to act as an adapter.(4)
Protocol module of the network under test: This module is the protocol object code under test. In the training phase, it receives a large number of use cases generated by the fuzzy test tool to perform the test; in the usage phase, it receives the test cases filtered by the neural network module to perform the test.Figure 2
Framework structure of fuzzy test system.


### 3.3. System Sub-Module Design and Implementation

The LSTM network and BP neural network prediction results have been compared above, so in this module, the LSTM network model is used. The use of LSTM model also takes more into account that:(1)
The input use case is a message, which can be regarded as a kind of sequence data, and the LSTM network is suitable for processing and prediction of sequence data.(2)
The input message content generally has a header and a data part; i.e., the previous text in the sequence data will have an impact on the later text, the position of its impact may be very different, the LSTM network can effectively select the information that should be remembered and forget the invalid information, so that the characteristics of the data can be truly identified and preserved during the training process [21–23].(3)
LSTM models can handle sequences of arbitrary length, while ordinary neural network nodes generally have a fixed number of nodes in the input layer, and if the sequence length changes, the model structure needs to be modified. And we know that the length of the input messages of different target programs, or even the same target program, is not certain. The LSTM satisfies this.In the stage of training the model, the execution flow of the module is shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Flowchart of the training phase of the use case selection module.Due to the unbalanced number of sample types, data preprocessing is required to match the number of samples before the model training.And in the use phase of the use case preference module, this module receives the variance mode vector generated by AFL, makes validity prediction, and then feeds the prediction result to AFL, which then performs further fuzzy testing work, and its specific workflow is shown in Figure4.Figure 4
Flowchart of the use phase of the use case optimization module.


## 3.1. Fuzzy Testing Algorithm Design

As mentioned earlier, the original AFL fuzzy testing tool randomly and violently mutates a large number of fuzzy test cases based on the seed cases and then feeds all these test cases into the subject for fuzzy testing. This leads to the problem that the subject executes a large number of test cases, but only finds a very small number of valid test cases. In order to test out the rare vulnerabilities, the execution cost of the subject under test is huge.To solve the problem of costly execution of the subject under test, this section designs a fuzzy testing algorithm based on a combination of deep learning test case preference methods that use neural networks to prefer test cases generated in the fuzzy testing process. This algorithm is able to optimize the use case generation session during fuzzy testing in a generalized, automated manner, avoiding the acquisition of protocol prior knowledge.The core idea of the algorithm is to input the test cases from the fuzzy test tool into the neural network model trained for the protocol object of the network under test for prediction, then to include the cases that are judged as valid by the neural network model as the preferred cases, while the cases that are judged as invalid are directly discarded, and then to use the preferred cases for the protocol object under test for further fuzzy test. In this way, the selection of message cases can be performed by the neural network model, and the proportion of vulnerabilities in the tested network protocol objects will be much larger than that of the message cases generated by the traditional fuzzy test tool.The algorithm optimizes the testing process of the AFL fuzzy testing tool in the following way.(1)
Take a seeds from the given set of seed use cases and mutate the seed use cases using different mutation algorithms.(2)
Based on the obtained mutation test case, compute the mutation vector of the mutation.(3)
Predicting the validity of this mutation mode vector using a use case preference method.(4)
Putting the predicted valid test case into the protocol object under test for execution and monitoring the execution results.(5)
If a crash, timeout, or new code path is caused in the protocol object under test, the test case is added to the final set of valid use case outputs.


## 3.2. Fuzzy Testing System Framework Design

Based on the above core algorithm, this paper designs a fuzzy test system as shown in Figure2, which contains four main modules, and the use process is divided into training phase and use phase:(1)
Use case selection module: This module contains the deep learning model implementation of the use case selection method in the previous chapter and is mainly responsible for the validity prediction of the input message use cases. In the training phase, this module uses the test cases generated by the AFL fuzzy test tool for model training; in the usage phase, the model receives the test case output from the AFL fuzzy test tool module and performs validity prediction for the cases, so as to filter invalid cases and return the validity determination results of the cases to the AFL fuzzy test tool module.(2)
AFL fuzzy tester module: This module contains the improved AFL tool, which is mainly responsible for variation generation of test cases and detection of the results of the variation cases in the object under test. In this system, each test case is a variant message input to the protocol under test. In the training phase of the neural network, this module is used to mutate a large number of test cases, each of which contains the test message and the execution result of the message in the protocol under test; in the usage phase, this module mutates the test message cases, inputs them to the case selection module for prediction, and then puts the predicted valid messages into the protocol under test for execution and detection.(3)
Network protocol adapter module: This module is mainly used to accept test case input from AFL to the network protocol module under test and send the test cases to the network protocol module under test for execution by receiving the input from the network protocol module under test. Since different network protocol modules under test have different input methods, such as socket method, this module is used to act as an adapter.(4)
Protocol module of the network under test: This module is the protocol object code under test. In the training phase, it receives a large number of use cases generated by the fuzzy test tool to perform the test; in the usage phase, it receives the test cases filtered by the neural network module to perform the test.Figure 2
Framework structure of fuzzy test system.


## 3.3. System Sub-Module Design and Implementation

The LSTM network and BP neural network prediction results have been compared above, so in this module, the LSTM network model is used. The use of LSTM model also takes more into account that:(1)
The input use case is a message, which can be regarded as a kind of sequence data, and the LSTM network is suitable for processing and prediction of sequence data.(2)
The input message content generally has a header and a data part; i.e., the previous text in the sequence data will have an impact on the later text, the position of its impact may be very different, the LSTM network can effectively select the information that should be remembered and forget the invalid information, so that the characteristics of the data can be truly identified and preserved during the training process [21–23].(3)
LSTM models can handle sequences of arbitrary length, while ordinary neural network nodes generally have a fixed number of nodes in the input layer, and if the sequence length changes, the model structure needs to be modified. And we know that the length of the input messages of different target programs, or even the same target program, is not certain. The LSTM satisfies this.In the stage of training the model, the execution flow of the module is shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Flowchart of the training phase of the use case selection module.Due to the unbalanced number of sample types, data preprocessing is required to match the number of samples before the model training.And in the use phase of the use case preference module, this module receives the variance mode vector generated by AFL, makes validity prediction, and then feeds the prediction result to AFL, which then performs further fuzzy testing work, and its specific workflow is shown in Figure4.Figure 4
Flowchart of the use phase of the use case optimization module.


## 4. System Validation

In order to verify whether the improved AFL can successfully fuzzy test network protocols and to verify the optimization effect of the use case optimization module on the fuzzy test system, the open-source codes of three single-state network protocols, Modbus protocol, HTTP protocol, and DNS protocol, are selected to verify this system [24].The remaining parameters of the validation environment are shown in Table1.Table 1
Fuzzy test system validation environment.
Verify environmentconfiguration itemsOpen-sourcetools/codeSpecificversionPrograminglanguageFuzzy testing toolAFL2.52 bC languageModbus protocollibmodbus3.1.4C languageHTTP protocolhttp-parse2.9.2C languageDNS protocoldnsmasq2.73C language


### 4.1. Modbus Protocol Fuzzy Test

The Modbus protocol is a common industrial control network protocol used in electronic controllers, which allows controllers to communicate directly with each other to form an industrial control network for unified management. The protocol can work on Ethernet or TCP networks. In this section, the C implementation of libmodbus open-source code [15], version 3.1.4, is selected for fuzzy testing of modbus-tcp [25–27].After getting the modules ready, the fuzzy test system workflow is run. Figure5 shows the running interface of the system in the fuzzy testing process. In this paper, the number of valid use cases uncovered by the fuzzy testing process is used as a validation criterion for the effectiveness of fuzzy testing. In this paper, the code for counting the number of use cases is added to AFL. In order to compare the output ratio of effective use cases with the original AFL fuzzy testing tool, the total number of test cases and the number of effective use cases of the fuzzy testing system before and after using the use case selection module are counted in this paper, and the final test results are shown in Figure 5.Figure 5
Comparison of libmodbus test results.Based on the comparison results, it can be seen that the fuzzy test system with the use case preference can basically discover more valid test cases with the same number of use cases in the fuzzy test for libmodbus.


### 4.2. HTTP Protocol Fuzzy Test

The HTTP protocol is an application layer protocol for WEB content delivery and works over TCP. In this paper, version 2.9.2 of the http-parser open-source code, implemented in C, was used for fuzzy testing of the HTTP protocol [28].Similarly, the fuzzy test system with the use case preference module and the original AFL tool without the module were used to fuzzy test http-parser.By comparing the output ratio of valid use cases with the original AFL tool, the final comparison test results are shown in Figure6.Figure 6
http-parser test result comparison chart.The horizontal coordinate is the number of use cases executed by http-parser-2.9.2, and the vertical coordinate is the number of use cases that are judged as valid in the actual execution of http-parser-2.9.2. AFL-FUZZ is the fuzzy test result of http-parser-2.9.2 by the original AFL fuzzy test tool, and AI-FUZZ is the fuzzy test result of http-parser-2.9.2 by the vulnerability mining system designed in this paper. AI-FUZZ is the fuzzy test result of the vulnerability mining system designed in this paper for http-parser-2.9.2.


### 4.3. DNS Protocol Fuzzing Test

In this paper, version 2.73 of the C implementation of the dnsmasq open-source code [17] was selected for fuzzing tests of the DNS protocol. The results are shown in Figure 7, which compares the output ratio of valid use cases with the original AFL. The horizontal coordinates are the number of use cases executed by dnsmasq-2.73, and the vertical coordinates are the number of use cases judged to be valid by the actual execution of dnsmasq-2.73. AFL-FUZZ is the fuzzy test result of the original AFL fuzzy test tool for dnsmasq-2.73, and AI-FUZZ is the fuzzy test result of the vulnerability mining system designed in this paper for dnsmasq-2.73.2.73 by the vulnerability mining system designed in this paper. It can be seen that this system also outperforms the original AFL fuzzy testing tool in fuzzy testing for dnsmasq.Figure 7
Comparison chart of test results.


## 4.1. Modbus Protocol Fuzzy Test

The Modbus protocol is a common industrial control network protocol used in electronic controllers, which allows controllers to communicate directly with each other to form an industrial control network for unified management. The protocol can work on Ethernet or TCP networks. In this section, the C implementation of libmodbus open-source code [15], version 3.1.4, is selected for fuzzy testing of modbus-tcp [25–27].After getting the modules ready, the fuzzy test system workflow is run. Figure5 shows the running interface of the system in the fuzzy testing process. In this paper, the number of valid use cases uncovered by the fuzzy testing process is used as a validation criterion for the effectiveness of fuzzy testing. In this paper, the code for counting the number of use cases is added to AFL. In order to compare the output ratio of effective use cases with the original AFL fuzzy testing tool, the total number of test cases and the number of effective use cases of the fuzzy testing system before and after using the use case selection module are counted in this paper, and the final test results are shown in Figure 5.Figure 5
Comparison of libmodbus test results.Based on the comparison results, it can be seen that the fuzzy test system with the use case preference can basically discover more valid test cases with the same number of use cases in the fuzzy test for libmodbus.


## 4.2. HTTP Protocol Fuzzy Test

The HTTP protocol is an application layer protocol for WEB content delivery and works over TCP. In this paper, version 2.9.2 of the http-parser open-source code, implemented in C, was used for fuzzy testing of the HTTP protocol [28].Similarly, the fuzzy test system with the use case preference module and the original AFL tool without the module were used to fuzzy test http-parser.By comparing the output ratio of valid use cases with the original AFL tool, the final comparison test results are shown in Figure6.Figure 6
http-parser test result comparison chart.The horizontal coordinate is the number of use cases executed by http-parser-2.9.2, and the vertical coordinate is the number of use cases that are judged as valid in the actual execution of http-parser-2.9.2. AFL-FUZZ is the fuzzy test result of http-parser-2.9.2 by the original AFL fuzzy test tool, and AI-FUZZ is the fuzzy test result of http-parser-2.9.2 by the vulnerability mining system designed in this paper. AI-FUZZ is the fuzzy test result of the vulnerability mining system designed in this paper for http-parser-2.9.2.


## 4.3. DNS Protocol Fuzzing Test

In this paper, version 2.73 of the C implementation of the dnsmasq open-source code [17] was selected for fuzzing tests of the DNS protocol. The results are shown in Figure 7, which compares the output ratio of valid use cases with the original AFL. The horizontal coordinates are the number of use cases executed by dnsmasq-2.73, and the vertical coordinates are the number of use cases judged to be valid by the actual execution of dnsmasq-2.73. AFL-FUZZ is the fuzzy test result of the original AFL fuzzy test tool for dnsmasq-2.73, and AI-FUZZ is the fuzzy test result of the vulnerability mining system designed in this paper for dnsmasq-2.73.2.73 by the vulnerability mining system designed in this paper. It can be seen that this system also outperforms the original AFL fuzzy testing tool in fuzzy testing for dnsmasq.Figure 7
Comparison chart of test results.


## 5. Conclusions

In this paper, we design and implement a fuzzy testing algorithm and system for single-state network protocols. The fuzzy testing system incorporates the use case selection method and improves the AFL fuzzy testing tool with the network protocol adapter to achieve the fuzzy testing of network protocols. For the fuzzy testing system, we introduce the way the modules work together and the process of fuzzy testing using this system, and validate the system with open-source implementations of Modbus, HTTP, and DNS protocols. The validation results show that the fuzzy testing system implemented in this paper can successfully complete the fuzzy testing of network protocols and discover real and valid test cases, and the fuzzy testing system combined with the use case selection method is more efficient in discovering valid use cases than the original AFL fuzzy testing tool. Sending the test cases evaluated by machine learning as easy to trigger vulnerabilities to test H-target can save time and improve the efficiency of vulnerability mining for everyone. At the same time, the system can focus on changes in fields that are prone to trigger vulnerabilities based on the structure and weights of the machine learning model.



---

*Source: 9086938-2022-06-24.xml*