# Effects of Various Processing Methods on the Ultrastructure of Tendon Collagen Fibrils from Qinchuan Beef Cattle Observed with Atomic Force Microscopy

Authors: Guixia Li; Yunfei Wan; Xuan Song; Ying Wang; Linsen Zan; Jie Zhu
Journal: Journal of Food Quality
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

Atomic force microscopy was utilized to study the effects of ultrasound oscillation, microwave heating, water bath cooking, and acid-base soaking on the ultrastructure of collagen fibrils of Qinchuan beef cattle tendons. D-spacing length and roughness of collagen fibrils always showed a 1.02% increment in the group which was processed for 20 min rather than for 10 min under different ultrasound frequencies. Microwave heating had a slight impact on D-spacing length and roughness at lower power (140–560 W), and collagen fibrils always showed a 1.02% increment for 20 min. Then, visible changes were noted with increasing power and time. D-spacing length reduced by 1.01% at 50°C for treatment periods of 10 min, 20 min, and 30 min, and there was no obvious change at 60°C; the periodic structure disappeared after cooking for 20 min, when fibrils had become gelatinized at 70°C. Collagen fibrils became disorganized at pH 3, following acid-base soaking. The present study indicated that acid-base soaking had an outstanding effect on the ultrastructure of collagen fibrils, especially in an acidic environment in consideration of the special structure of collagen.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Qinchuan beef cattle belong to large animals, that is, meat combination with strong limbs and big hoofs. As the main composition of beef tendons, collagen fibrils are the most abundant proteins in mammalian tissues, accounting for more than 30% of the total protein [1]. It is the extracellular matrix framework that is synthesized and secreted from cells of fibroblasts, chondrocytes, osteoblasts, and some epithelial cells [2]. Type I collagen is the most abundant and typical in all types, which mainly exists in skin, bones, tendons, cornea, and teeth [3–5]. The current molecular model of the D-period involves two regions, one where all the molecules overlap and one where 20% of the molecules are missing due to an axial gap [6, 7].In the food industry, collagen has been applied to improve elasticity and stability of various products such as beverages, soups, pasta, and meat [8]. Collagen hydrolysates have played an important role in protein supplements, particularly in maintaining the inner-corporal nitrogen balance. The hardness of collagen could be applied to identify meat tenderization because different meats contain different collagen contents. Recently, it has been used as an index of meat quality. On the one hand, collagen is significant to build up the tenacity of muscles and bones, especially for those who have been suffering from lumbar debility and physically weak bodies and on the other hand, collagen ensures that adolescents grow healthy and elderly people suffer less from osteoporosis. Moreover, it can accelerate wound healing [9]. In addition, beef tendon foods can be used as additives, nutrition enhancers, etc.Ultrasonication, microwave heating, water bath, and acid-base soaking [10–13] were performed to study the effects on the ultrastructure of collagen fibrils of beef tendons. The aim of these studies was to induce structural changes to promote collagen processing. Such changes could also catch about the external ultrastructure and mechanical properties of collagen fibrils by atomic force microscope (AFM) [14], which is a suitable tool to acquire superficial information. AFM has been applied to take molecular- and atomic-scale measurements on biological systems. This scanning probe microscope (SPM) has allowed the study of biological systems, similar to that experienced in the fields of solid-state surfaces and interfaces [15–17]. AFM is a new instrument with high resolution at the atomic level, not only to collect topological images of cells and bio-macromolecules at a nanoscale resolution, but also to detect microscopic local mechanical properties [18, 19]. Therefore, it may be an effective tool to study the collagen fibril’s nanostructure and mechanical properties quantitatively for further research. The limitations of the AFM technique are linked to impurities covering a sample’s surface.In the present study, the research focus on distinct processing methods influenced the ultrastructure of collagen fibrils, but they all disrupted the ordered arrangement with higher intensity.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Preparation of Beef Tendon

The tendon tissues from 18-month-old Qinchuan beef cattle were offered by Prof. Zan at the National Beef Cattle Improvement Center of Northwest A&F University. These tissues were placed in centrifuge tubes and stored at −20°C in a refrigerator until further processing and analysis. The beef tendon tissues were cut into 0.3 cm3 cubes and were homogenized intermittently in distilled water using a T10 IKA homogenizer (IKA Co., Germany) until homogeneous floccules occurred.


### 2.2. Ultrasonic Oscillation of Beef Tendon

The prepared 1 ml beef tendon homogenate was oscillated by using an ultrasonic bath (Ningbo, Scientz Biotechnology Co., China) at 20, 28, and 40 kHz for 10 and 20 min separately. During the processing, ice cubes were added into the bath in order to reduce the thermal influence by a potential temperature increase during the sonication process. Thus, the temperature was regulated at about 25°C.


### 2.3. Microwave Heating of Beef Tendon

The prepared 20μl homogenized tendon droplets were deposited onto freshly cleaved mica and heated in a S0-microwave oven (Galanz Co., China). Microwave power was set to 140, 280, 420, 560, and 700 W for 5, 10, and 15 min. To maintain air humidity, a cup of water was made available for the microwave oven before microwave heating.


### 2.4. Water Bath Heating of Beef Tendon

The raw material of tendon was homogenized with 1 ml of homogenized liquid and transferred into centrifuge tubes. Then, this was placed in a HH-6 constant temperature water bath (Guohua Apparatus Co., China) at 50°C, 60°C, and 70°C for 10 min, 20 min, and 30 min, respectively. During the heating process, homogenized tendons of some treatment groups reunited and they were homogenized again to ensure uniform floccule formation.


### 2.5. Acid-Base Soaking of Beef Tendon

Both 0.1 M HCl and 0.1 M NaOH were used to adjust pH values to 3, 5, 7, and 10. Tendon homogenate in each treatment group was centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 2 min, and then, the supernatant was filtered. This was added to 1 ml solutions of different pH values in each centrifuge tube and incubated for 7.5, 15, and 25 h. The treated groups were centrifuged again at the same speed and 1 ml of distilled water was added into the precipitate for resuspension.


### 2.6. AFM Imaging and Data Analysis

The tendon samples were deposited onto freshly cleaved mica and placed in a ventilated place for air-drying and fixing, before rinsing 3 times with distilled water. Each treatment was replicated three times. All tests were carried out on a Multimode-8 AFM with SCANASYST-AIR probes (Bruker Co., Santa Barbara, CA) in ScanAsyst mode at 0.997 Hz. Height and error images in 512 × 512 pixels were collected simultaneously after a second order flatten, local filtering, and noisy line erasing using AFM offline software NanoScopeAnalysis V1.10 (Bruker Co., Santa Barbara, CA) to collect data on D-spacing length (DSL) and roughness of collagen fibrils. All the data were obtained from two-factor cross interactions, and the significance level was set at 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed by SAS8.0 (North Carolina, USA) using original DSL and roughness data from AFM height images of collagen fibrils associated with different processing methods and durations.


## 2.1. Preparation of Beef Tendon

The tendon tissues from 18-month-old Qinchuan beef cattle were offered by Prof. Zan at the National Beef Cattle Improvement Center of Northwest A&F University. These tissues were placed in centrifuge tubes and stored at −20°C in a refrigerator until further processing and analysis. The beef tendon tissues were cut into 0.3 cm3 cubes and were homogenized intermittently in distilled water using a T10 IKA homogenizer (IKA Co., Germany) until homogeneous floccules occurred.


## 2.2. Ultrasonic Oscillation of Beef Tendon

The prepared 1 ml beef tendon homogenate was oscillated by using an ultrasonic bath (Ningbo, Scientz Biotechnology Co., China) at 20, 28, and 40 kHz for 10 and 20 min separately. During the processing, ice cubes were added into the bath in order to reduce the thermal influence by a potential temperature increase during the sonication process. Thus, the temperature was regulated at about 25°C.


## 2.3. Microwave Heating of Beef Tendon

The prepared 20μl homogenized tendon droplets were deposited onto freshly cleaved mica and heated in a S0-microwave oven (Galanz Co., China). Microwave power was set to 140, 280, 420, 560, and 700 W for 5, 10, and 15 min. To maintain air humidity, a cup of water was made available for the microwave oven before microwave heating.


## 2.4. Water Bath Heating of Beef Tendon

The raw material of tendon was homogenized with 1 ml of homogenized liquid and transferred into centrifuge tubes. Then, this was placed in a HH-6 constant temperature water bath (Guohua Apparatus Co., China) at 50°C, 60°C, and 70°C for 10 min, 20 min, and 30 min, respectively. During the heating process, homogenized tendons of some treatment groups reunited and they were homogenized again to ensure uniform floccule formation.


## 2.5. Acid-Base Soaking of Beef Tendon

Both 0.1 M HCl and 0.1 M NaOH were used to adjust pH values to 3, 5, 7, and 10. Tendon homogenate in each treatment group was centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 2 min, and then, the supernatant was filtered. This was added to 1 ml solutions of different pH values in each centrifuge tube and incubated for 7.5, 15, and 25 h. The treated groups were centrifuged again at the same speed and 1 ml of distilled water was added into the precipitate for resuspension.


## 2.6. AFM Imaging and Data Analysis

The tendon samples were deposited onto freshly cleaved mica and placed in a ventilated place for air-drying and fixing, before rinsing 3 times with distilled water. Each treatment was replicated three times. All tests were carried out on a Multimode-8 AFM with SCANASYST-AIR probes (Bruker Co., Santa Barbara, CA) in ScanAsyst mode at 0.997 Hz. Height and error images in 512 × 512 pixels were collected simultaneously after a second order flatten, local filtering, and noisy line erasing using AFM offline software NanoScopeAnalysis V1.10 (Bruker Co., Santa Barbara, CA) to collect data on D-spacing length (DSL) and roughness of collagen fibrils. All the data were obtained from two-factor cross interactions, and the significance level was set at 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed by SAS8.0 (North Carolina, USA) using original DSL and roughness data from AFM height images of collagen fibrils associated with different processing methods and durations.


## 3. Results and Analysis

### 3.1. Effect of Ultrasonic Treatment on Collagen Fibrils

Typical AFM height images of collagen fibers with section analysis result are shown in Figures1(a)–1(c). D-spacing length (DSL) was measured with the section profile in Figure 1(c) due to the periodic structure of collagen fiber.Figure 1
Typical AFM height images of collagen fibrils. (a) Control group, (b) partial amplification of white dotted line in (a), and (c) section analysis profile of collagen fibrils along the white line.AFM height images of collagen fibrils are presented in Figure2 for different ultrasonic frequencies and treatment times. With the increase of frequency and time, the ultrastructure of the collagen fibrils became obscured, especially during treatment at 28 kHz and 40 kHz for 20 min, as shown in Figure 2. The changes of DSL were nonsignificant when the ultrasonic frequency was at 20 kHz; this would suggest that the triple-helix structure of the collagen molecule was stabilized by ultrasonic low-frequency treatment [20]. But it reached a maximum value of 71.86 ± 1.16 nm at 28 kHz sonication for 10 min. The DSL of the 20-minute group was greater than that of the 10-minute group at the same frequency. Chang et al. [21] studied the effects of ultrasonic treatment on collagen fiber ultrastructure and biomechanical properties of semitendinosus quality, indicating that collagen fibers were significantly disordered and staggered, and fiber arrangement became loose and denatured; it was the same phenomenon as shown in Figure 2. For scleroprotein, like collagen fibers, there was no significant impact on its surface morphology without any side effects, just cavitations after ultrasonic processing [22].Figure 2
Typical AFM height images of collagen fibrils treated by ultrasound at different frequencies: (a–c) 10-minute group and (d–f) 20-minute group were processed at 20, 28, and 40 kHz, respectively.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)As shown in Figure3, there was no significant difference (p>0.05) for roughness at different frequencies for 10 min, perhaps linked to the short sonication time. With a long time and high frequency, the roughness was up to the maximum (8.62 nm), which increased by 201.4% compared with the minimum value of 4.28 nm for the treatment group in 20 min. On the whole, roughness following sonication for 20 min was greater than that for 10 min at the same frequency, indicating an effect on the understructure.Figure 3
DSL (a) and roughness (b) of collagen fibrils under different ultrasonic frequencies and times. a, b, c, and d values in the row and column; entries with the same superscript are not significantly different (p≥0.05).
(a)
(b)


### 3.2. Effects of Microwave Treatment on Collagen Fibrils

AFM height images of collagen fibrils are shown in Figure4 for different microwave powers and treatment times. With increasing time and power, the periodic structure of collagen fibrils was lost by degrees and even disassembled from the fibril end. There was no significant variation in length and structure from the data and pictures among diverse power, thus, they were not listed for the 5-minute group. For the 15-minute group at 560 W and 700 W, the periodic structure disappeared, so there were no DSL data; DSL became longer for the 15-minute group than for the 5-minute and 10-minute groups. And the difference of DSL was not significant under 5 min and 10 min treatment time. The low microwave power and treatment time cannot change the DSL of collagen fibril maybe because of its stability [23]. With microwave power increasing, great changes occurred in the collagen ultrastructure, especially at 700 W for the groups of 10 min and 15 min, as shown in Figures 4(e) and 4(j). Overall, DSL was minimized at 140 W for the 15-minute group and maximized at 420 W for the 15-minute group.Figure 4
Typical AFM height images of collagen fibers treated by microwave. (a–e) 10-minute group and (f–j) 15-minute group were processed at 140, 280, 420, 560, and 700 W, respectively.The collagen fibrils were heated for 5 min in the microwave oven at different power levels as set out in Figure5. The periodic structure disappeared when at 700 W for the 10-minute group, but the roughness varied repeatedly with the power going up. For the 15-minute group, the structure disappeared at 560 and 700 W. Overall, the roughness was minimum at 700 W for the 5-minute group and maximum at 700 W for the 15-minute group. So, we inferred that the disordered structure of microwave treatment can increase the roughness of collagen fibrils.Figure 5
Changes of DSL (a) and roughness (b) of collagen fibrils under different microwave powers and times. a, b, and c values in the row and column; entries with the same superscript are not significantly different (p≥0.05).
(a)
(b)


### 3.3. Effects of Water Bath Heating on Collagen Fibrils

Water bath treatment had a strong impact on collagen fibrils. Different temperatures (50°C, 60°C, and 70°C) and processing times (10 min, 20 min, and 30 min) had significant effects on the surface morphology of collagen fibrils. The periodic collagen fibril structure could be observed at 50°C and 60°C. But this partially disappeared at 70°C for the 10-minute group, with collagen fiber structure completely disappearing for the 20-minute and 30-minute groups. This suggested that granular protein had been gelatinized as shown in Figures6(h) and 6(i) and similar changes were observed by Chang et al. [12]. And it was coincident with the research of Liu that collagen thermal denaturation is a time-dependent irreversible transformation [24].Figure 6
Typical AFM height images of collagen fibers heated in a water bath at (a–c) 50°C, (d–f) 60°C, and (g–i) 70°C for 10, 20, and 30 min, respectively.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)At 50°C, DSL reduced gradually over time; at 60°C, DSL became irregular and achieved the largest value when heated for 20 min but had no obvious changes. It was judged that the triple helices of collagen began to disintegrate at 70°C for the 20-minute and 30-minute groups in the present study; Xiao et al. [25] studied the law of conformational changes of collagen under heating conditions (15°C–95°C), and as temperature increased, the native triple helical structure of collagen gradually broke up and the disordered structure of protein was augmented. With a longer time or higher temperature, DSL became shorter and it was likely due to the effect of denaturation and shrinkage of collagen fibers during heating. Ma and Ledward also reported that collagen in connective tissue denatures and unfolds when the temperatures is 60–70°C [26].DSL of collagen fibrils was influenced by water bath heating and so was roughness. With the time increasing, roughness decreased little by little as shown in Figure7 at 50°C; over time, roughness rose gradually at 60°C; and the periodic structure disappeared at 70°C. In general, roughness at 70°C was greater than that at 50°C and 60°C for the three time periods, and it was up to the maximum for the 10-minute group at 70°C. The collagen fibril roughness increased with the disappearance of the triple helical structure as with the microwave treatment.Figure 7
DSL (a) and roughness (b) of collagen fibrils under different water bath temperatures and times. a, b, and c values in the row and column; entries with the same superscript are not significantly different (p≥0.05).
(a)
(b)


### 3.4. Effects of Acid-Base Soaking on Collagen Fibrils

The solutions with different pH values had an obvious effect on the collagen fibers’ surface morphology, especially at pH 3 (Figure8). After acid-base soaking, opaque white floccules became translucent lumps in the centrifuge tube. Chaotic arrangement and small fragments were notable from the pictures at pH 3. A wide range of periodic structures disappeared at pH 3 for the 25-hour group and there was a certain degree of increased length in acidic and alkaline environments compared with pH 7 [27]. Overall, the ultrastructure of fibers displayed the most noticeable changes at pH 3, and DSL was maximal at pH 5 for the 15-hour group. When samples were incubated for 7.5 h under different pH values, the variation of DSL was not apparent, but at pH 3, fibrils had presented chaotic arrangements. This suggested that a strong acid destroyed the cross-links among fibrils so that it disordered the alignment of the fibrils and even damaged the internal structure; there was essentially no effect on DSL. Local fibrils had been hydrolyzed during immersion for 15 h (Figure 8(b)); at pH 3, periodic structure disappeared in a wide range; therefore, DSL could not be measured for the 25 h incubation.Figure 8
Typical AFM height 2D (upper) and 3D (lower) images of collagen fibrils treated by acid-base soaking. (a–c) Samples soaked in acid solutions at pH 3 for 7.5, 15, and 25 h, respectively; (d–f) 3D images of (a–c), respectively.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)Figure9 gives the roughness values of samples incubated in solutions where pH values were 3, 5, 7, and 10. For the 25-hour group at pH 3, the ultrastructure of collagen fibrils disappeared, indicating that the collagen fibrils had been hydrolyzed. It could be noticed that roughness tended to be stable because of a lot of processing and reached a maximum for the 15-hour group at pH 3.Figure 9
DSL (a) and roughness (b) of collagen fibrils soaked in acidic and alkaline solutions. a, b, c, and d values in the row and column; entries with the same superscript are not significantly different (p≥0.05).
(a)
(b)


## 3.1. Effect of Ultrasonic Treatment on Collagen Fibrils

Typical AFM height images of collagen fibers with section analysis result are shown in Figures1(a)–1(c). D-spacing length (DSL) was measured with the section profile in Figure 1(c) due to the periodic structure of collagen fiber.Figure 1
Typical AFM height images of collagen fibrils. (a) Control group, (b) partial amplification of white dotted line in (a), and (c) section analysis profile of collagen fibrils along the white line.AFM height images of collagen fibrils are presented in Figure2 for different ultrasonic frequencies and treatment times. With the increase of frequency and time, the ultrastructure of the collagen fibrils became obscured, especially during treatment at 28 kHz and 40 kHz for 20 min, as shown in Figure 2. The changes of DSL were nonsignificant when the ultrasonic frequency was at 20 kHz; this would suggest that the triple-helix structure of the collagen molecule was stabilized by ultrasonic low-frequency treatment [20]. But it reached a maximum value of 71.86 ± 1.16 nm at 28 kHz sonication for 10 min. The DSL of the 20-minute group was greater than that of the 10-minute group at the same frequency. Chang et al. [21] studied the effects of ultrasonic treatment on collagen fiber ultrastructure and biomechanical properties of semitendinosus quality, indicating that collagen fibers were significantly disordered and staggered, and fiber arrangement became loose and denatured; it was the same phenomenon as shown in Figure 2. For scleroprotein, like collagen fibers, there was no significant impact on its surface morphology without any side effects, just cavitations after ultrasonic processing [22].Figure 2
Typical AFM height images of collagen fibrils treated by ultrasound at different frequencies: (a–c) 10-minute group and (d–f) 20-minute group were processed at 20, 28, and 40 kHz, respectively.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)As shown in Figure3, there was no significant difference (p>0.05) for roughness at different frequencies for 10 min, perhaps linked to the short sonication time. With a long time and high frequency, the roughness was up to the maximum (8.62 nm), which increased by 201.4% compared with the minimum value of 4.28 nm for the treatment group in 20 min. On the whole, roughness following sonication for 20 min was greater than that for 10 min at the same frequency, indicating an effect on the understructure.Figure 3
DSL (a) and roughness (b) of collagen fibrils under different ultrasonic frequencies and times. a, b, c, and d values in the row and column; entries with the same superscript are not significantly different (p≥0.05).
(a)
(b)


## 3.2. Effects of Microwave Treatment on Collagen Fibrils

AFM height images of collagen fibrils are shown in Figure4 for different microwave powers and treatment times. With increasing time and power, the periodic structure of collagen fibrils was lost by degrees and even disassembled from the fibril end. There was no significant variation in length and structure from the data and pictures among diverse power, thus, they were not listed for the 5-minute group. For the 15-minute group at 560 W and 700 W, the periodic structure disappeared, so there were no DSL data; DSL became longer for the 15-minute group than for the 5-minute and 10-minute groups. And the difference of DSL was not significant under 5 min and 10 min treatment time. The low microwave power and treatment time cannot change the DSL of collagen fibril maybe because of its stability [23]. With microwave power increasing, great changes occurred in the collagen ultrastructure, especially at 700 W for the groups of 10 min and 15 min, as shown in Figures 4(e) and 4(j). Overall, DSL was minimized at 140 W for the 15-minute group and maximized at 420 W for the 15-minute group.Figure 4
Typical AFM height images of collagen fibers treated by microwave. (a–e) 10-minute group and (f–j) 15-minute group were processed at 140, 280, 420, 560, and 700 W, respectively.The collagen fibrils were heated for 5 min in the microwave oven at different power levels as set out in Figure5. The periodic structure disappeared when at 700 W for the 10-minute group, but the roughness varied repeatedly with the power going up. For the 15-minute group, the structure disappeared at 560 and 700 W. Overall, the roughness was minimum at 700 W for the 5-minute group and maximum at 700 W for the 15-minute group. So, we inferred that the disordered structure of microwave treatment can increase the roughness of collagen fibrils.Figure 5
Changes of DSL (a) and roughness (b) of collagen fibrils under different microwave powers and times. a, b, and c values in the row and column; entries with the same superscript are not significantly different (p≥0.05).
(a)
(b)


## 3.3. Effects of Water Bath Heating on Collagen Fibrils

Water bath treatment had a strong impact on collagen fibrils. Different temperatures (50°C, 60°C, and 70°C) and processing times (10 min, 20 min, and 30 min) had significant effects on the surface morphology of collagen fibrils. The periodic collagen fibril structure could be observed at 50°C and 60°C. But this partially disappeared at 70°C for the 10-minute group, with collagen fiber structure completely disappearing for the 20-minute and 30-minute groups. This suggested that granular protein had been gelatinized as shown in Figures6(h) and 6(i) and similar changes were observed by Chang et al. [12]. And it was coincident with the research of Liu that collagen thermal denaturation is a time-dependent irreversible transformation [24].Figure 6
Typical AFM height images of collagen fibers heated in a water bath at (a–c) 50°C, (d–f) 60°C, and (g–i) 70°C for 10, 20, and 30 min, respectively.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)At 50°C, DSL reduced gradually over time; at 60°C, DSL became irregular and achieved the largest value when heated for 20 min but had no obvious changes. It was judged that the triple helices of collagen began to disintegrate at 70°C for the 20-minute and 30-minute groups in the present study; Xiao et al. [25] studied the law of conformational changes of collagen under heating conditions (15°C–95°C), and as temperature increased, the native triple helical structure of collagen gradually broke up and the disordered structure of protein was augmented. With a longer time or higher temperature, DSL became shorter and it was likely due to the effect of denaturation and shrinkage of collagen fibers during heating. Ma and Ledward also reported that collagen in connective tissue denatures and unfolds when the temperatures is 60–70°C [26].DSL of collagen fibrils was influenced by water bath heating and so was roughness. With the time increasing, roughness decreased little by little as shown in Figure7 at 50°C; over time, roughness rose gradually at 60°C; and the periodic structure disappeared at 70°C. In general, roughness at 70°C was greater than that at 50°C and 60°C for the three time periods, and it was up to the maximum for the 10-minute group at 70°C. The collagen fibril roughness increased with the disappearance of the triple helical structure as with the microwave treatment.Figure 7
DSL (a) and roughness (b) of collagen fibrils under different water bath temperatures and times. a, b, and c values in the row and column; entries with the same superscript are not significantly different (p≥0.05).
(a)
(b)


## 3.4. Effects of Acid-Base Soaking on Collagen Fibrils

The solutions with different pH values had an obvious effect on the collagen fibers’ surface morphology, especially at pH 3 (Figure8). After acid-base soaking, opaque white floccules became translucent lumps in the centrifuge tube. Chaotic arrangement and small fragments were notable from the pictures at pH 3. A wide range of periodic structures disappeared at pH 3 for the 25-hour group and there was a certain degree of increased length in acidic and alkaline environments compared with pH 7 [27]. Overall, the ultrastructure of fibers displayed the most noticeable changes at pH 3, and DSL was maximal at pH 5 for the 15-hour group. When samples were incubated for 7.5 h under different pH values, the variation of DSL was not apparent, but at pH 3, fibrils had presented chaotic arrangements. This suggested that a strong acid destroyed the cross-links among fibrils so that it disordered the alignment of the fibrils and even damaged the internal structure; there was essentially no effect on DSL. Local fibrils had been hydrolyzed during immersion for 15 h (Figure 8(b)); at pH 3, periodic structure disappeared in a wide range; therefore, DSL could not be measured for the 25 h incubation.Figure 8
Typical AFM height 2D (upper) and 3D (lower) images of collagen fibrils treated by acid-base soaking. (a–c) Samples soaked in acid solutions at pH 3 for 7.5, 15, and 25 h, respectively; (d–f) 3D images of (a–c), respectively.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)Figure9 gives the roughness values of samples incubated in solutions where pH values were 3, 5, 7, and 10. For the 25-hour group at pH 3, the ultrastructure of collagen fibrils disappeared, indicating that the collagen fibrils had been hydrolyzed. It could be noticed that roughness tended to be stable because of a lot of processing and reached a maximum for the 15-hour group at pH 3.Figure 9
DSL (a) and roughness (b) of collagen fibrils soaked in acidic and alkaline solutions. a, b, c, and d values in the row and column; entries with the same superscript are not significantly different (p≥0.05).
(a)
(b)


## 4. Conclusions

Ultrasonic oscillation, microwave heating, water bath cooking, and acid-base soaking had complex effects on the internal structure of collagen fibrils of Qinchuan cattle tendons. As a result of ultrasonic oscillation, DSL values after 20 min were generally greater than after 10 min, as were roughness values. The regular cross-striated fibril structure disappeared, along with disintegration of the protein structure, after microwave heating at 700 W for 10 and 15 min. DSL values became gradually shorter at 50°C; they became shorter within 20 min, at 60°C. After 20 min at 70°C in a water bath, fibrils had become gelatinized. The cross-links between fibrils disappeared at pH 3 and fibrils were even hydrolyzed by acid-base soaking.The ultrastructure of fibrils and internal connections were modified by different treatments. Although fibril structure could not be changed by ultrasonic treatment, the other three treatments led to the denaturation of fibrils and protein by strengthening the reaction intensity. This study is exploratory and tentative, with less pertinent reports and research on fiber level particularly. It elaborates ultrastructural changes in the collagen fibrils through four different treatments qualitatively and quantitatively; compared with other methods, it is more detailed and accurate. The present technology provided an extremely useful direction and guidance for meat quality evaluation and microscopic measurement. This study was mainly engaged at the fiber level and expected to further studies such as those on fiber gels in the future [28].



---

*Source: 9090831-2018-07-11.xml*