# Direct Interband Light Absorption in Conical Quantum Dot

Authors: D. B. Hayrapetyan; A. V. Chalyan; E. M. Kazaryan; H. A. Sarkisyan
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

In the framework of the adiabatic approximation, the energy states of electron as well as the direct light absorption are investigated in conical quantum dot. Analytical expressions for particle energy spectrum are obtained. The dependence of the absorption edge on geometrical parameters of conical quantum dot is obtained. Selection rules are revealed for transitions between levels with different quantum numbers. In particular, it is shown that for the radial quantum number transitions are allowed between the levels with the same quantum numbers, and any transitions between different levels are allowed for the principal quantum number.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The conical quantum dots (CQD) are zero-dimensional systems with nontrivial geometry, the analytic description of which is an extremely difficult problem [1–5]. From the other side, availability of many geometrical parameters characterizing the CQD allows realizing flexible manipulation of the energy levels of the charge carriers in these systems. The radius of the base and the height (or, equivalently, the cone angle) are from above-mentioned geometric parameters of CQD.It is clear that, changing these parameters, we can manipulate the energy levels of the electrons and holes in these systems which lead to the change of the intraband and interband quantum transitions behavior. Theoretical study of physical processes in the CQD was held in [5–9]. It should be noted that for the theoretical description the form of confining potential of observed nanostructure has fundamental importance. In such systems, an important role may play, in particular, effects of mechanical stress. This question has been studied in [10, 11]. Thus, the authors based on the continuum elastic theory, present a finite element analysis to investigate the influences of the elastic anisotropy and thickness of spacing layer on the strain field distribution and band edges (both conduction band and valence band) of the InAs/GaAs conical shaped quantum dots.In another work [12], authors studied intersubband linear and third-order nonlinear optical properties of CQD with infinite barrier potential. The electron structure of CQDs through effective mass approximation is determined analytically. Linear, nonlinear, and total absorption coefficients, as well as the refractive indices of GaAs CQDs, are calculated. The effect of the dots size and the effect of the incident electromagnetic field are investigated. Results show that the total absorption coefficient and the refractive index of the dots largely depend on the size of the dots and on the intensity and polarization of the incident electromagnetic field.As follows from the results of these studies, strain potentials are rather complicated and do not allow conduct an analytical description of the physical process at the CQD. On the other hand, the authors of papers [5, 8, 9, 12] considered the profile of the confining potential of CQD in the frame of the model of a rectangular infinitely deep well. It is noteworthy that the infinitely deep confining potential allows the partial separation of variables, and this greatly facilitates the description of CQDs. Along with the above description of the mechanisms of the CQD, in the case of a small cone angle, effective analytical method description of such systems is the adiabatic approximation [13]. Under this approach, a quantum system can be represented as being linked to two subsystems: fast and slow.The Hamiltonian of the fast subsystem includes variables as parameters of the slow subsystem, and an effective potential energy plays a slow subsystem (parametrically depending on coordinates of slow system) energy fast [14–16]. This peculiar method of separation of variables allows us to give an analytical description of single-particle states.In this paper, the energy states of electron and direct interband light absorption in CQD are investigated within the framework of adiabatic approximation.


## 2. Theory

Let us consider an impenetrable conical QD (see Figure1), where H is height of the cone and R is radius of the base of the cone. Here the angle of the top of the cone is denoted by θ. Note that we consider the case of small angles of the top of cone θ≪1. It means that R≪H and hence(1)tgθ=RH≪1.Figure 1
Schematic figure of conical quantum dot.Such a case is possible when, during the experiment, conical quantum dots were grown with high height [1–3]. Condition (1) gives us the opportunity to apply geometrical adiabatic approximation for solving the problem [13]. The potential energy of a charged particle (electron or hole) in such structure has the following form:(2)Uconfρ,φ,z=0,particle∈Δ,∞,particle∉Δ.In the regime of strong size quantization, the energy of the Coulomb interaction between the electron and hole is much less than the energy caused by the size quantization. In this approximation, the Coulomb interaction between particles can be neglected. Then, the problem is reduced to the determination of separate energy states of the electron and hole. It follows from the geometrical form of conical QD that the particle motion along the radial direction occurs more rapidly than along thez-direction. This allows one to use the adiabatic approximation [13]. The Hamiltonian of the system in the cylindrical coordinates has the form(3)H^ρ,φ,z=-ħ22me∗1ρ∂∂ρρ∂∂ρ+1ρ2∂2∂φ2+∂2∂z2+Uconfρ,φ,z,where me∗ is effective mass of charge carrier. The frequency of the radial “motion” is much greater than the frequency characterizing the “motion” along the axis of the cone. Consequently, the Hamiltonian of the system can be represented as a sum of the Hamiltonians for the “fast” (H^f) and “slow” (H^s) subsystems:(4)H^ρ,φ,z=H^fρ,φ;z+H^sρ,φ,z,where(5)H^fρ,φ;z=-ħ22me∗1ρ∂∂ρρ∂∂ρ+1ρ2∂2∂φ2+Uconfρ,φ,z,H^sz=-ħ22me∗∂2∂z2.Axial variablez in H^fρ,φ;z plays the role of a constant parameter. According to geometrical adiabatic approximation, the wave function of the system is represented as follows:(6)Ψρ,φ,z=eimφ2πfρ;zχz.By substituting wave function in the Schrödinger equation for the “fast” subsystem, for the radial wave functionfρ;z we get(7)ħ22me∗f′′ρ;z+1ρf′ρ;z-m2ρ2fρ;z+Eradzfρ;z=0,where Eradz is the radial part of energy. The solution of this equation is given through the Bessel functions of the first kind Jm(δρ) [17], where δ=2me∗Eradz/ħ2. The radial wave function should satisfy the following boundary conditions:(8)JmH-ztgθ=0.From this boundary conditions finally we obtain the expression for energy of “fast” subsystem(9)Enρ,mradz=ħ2λnρ,m22me∗H-z2tg2θ,where λnρ,m are zeros of the Bessel functions of the first kind nρ=0,1,2,…. For the lower levels of the spectrum, the particle is mainly localized in the region z≪H. Based on this we expand Enρ,mradz into a series:(10)Enρ,mradz=Erad01-zH-2≈Erad01+2zH,where Erad0=ħ2λnρ,m2/2me∗R2. Relation (10) represents an effective potential which is incorporated in Schrödinger equation of the “slow” subsystem(11)-ħ22me∗∂2∂z2χz+Erad01+2zHχz=Eχz.This equation after simple transformations reduced to the form(12)-ħ22me∗d2χzdz2+Fzχz=E-Erad0χz,where Eax=E-Erad0 is the axial part of the total energy and F=2Erad0/H. Introducing new notations z0=ħ2/2me∗F1/3 and z-=(1/z0)z-E/F for the Schrödinger equation of “slow” subsystem we get(13)d2χz-dz-2-z-χz-=0.Solution of this equation is given by the Airy function of the first kind Aiz- [17]:(14)χz-=cAiz-=c1π∫0∞cos⁡uz--13u3du.From the boundary conditions, we get expression for the axial energy:(15)Eax=-ħ2F22me∗1/3αn+1,where αn+1 and n=0,1,2,… are zeros of the Airy function (α1≈-2.338, α2≈-4.087, etc.). Finally, for the total energy of the system we can write(16)E=Erad+Eax=ħ2λnρ,m22me∗R2-ħ22me∗2λnρ,m2HR22/3αn+1.As we mentioned above in the regime of strong size quantization the energy of the Coulomb interaction between the electron and hole is much less than the energy caused by the size quantization and it can be neglected in first approximation. Table 1 presents the comparison of the energy of Coulomb interaction between the electron and hole and size quantization energy for different values of geometrical parameters of conical quantum dot. The correction energy is calculated by the help of perturbation theory. According to perturbation theory, the energy of the first correction is(17)Eν1=νVρ,zν.Here Vρ,z=-e2/κρ2+z2, where κ is the static dielectric constant. It can be seen from Table 1 the correction energy always is negative and with the increase of radius R the relative contribution of Coulomb energy of exciton becomes significant.Table 1
The comparison of the energy of Coulomb interaction (Eeh) between the electron and hole and size quantization energy (ESQ).
m
=
0, nρ=0, n=0
m
=
1, nρ=0, n=0
m
=
0, nρ=1, n=0
m
=
0, nρ=0, n=1
E
SQ
/
E
R
E
e
h
/
E
R
E
SQ
/
E
R
E
e
h
/
E
R
E
SQ
/
E
R
E
e
h
/
E
R
E
SQ
/
E
R
E
e
h
/
E
R
R
=
0.5
a
B
29.624
−1.121
70.809
−0.877
141.542
−1.13
34.483
−0.95
H
=
10
a
B
R
=
1.0
a
B
8.359
−0.902
19.476
−0.708
38.272
−1.021
10.287
−0.608
H
=
10
a
B
R
=
1.5
a
B
4.071
−0.781
9.317
−0.635
18.085
−0.762
5.193
−0.503
H
=
10
a
B


## 3. Direct Interband Light Absorption

Consider the direct interband absorption in conical quantum in the strong size quantization regime, when the Coulomb interaction between electron and hole can be neglected. Furthermore, consider the case of a heavy hole withme∗≪mh∗, where me∗ and mh∗ are effective masses of the electron and hole, respectively. Then, the absorption coefficient is given by [18](18)KΩ=A∑ν,ν′∫ΨνeΨν′hdr→2δħΩ-Eg-Eνe-Eν′h,where Ψνν′eh is given by expression (6), ν and ν′ are sets of quantum numbers corresponding to the electron and the heavy hole, respectively, Eg is the band gap of massive semiconductor, Ω is the frequency of the incident light, and A is a quantity proportional to the square of the matrix element taken by Bloch functions [19]. In the regime of strong size quantization for the absorption edge we finally get(19)ħΩ000=Eg+ħ2λ0,022μR2+ħ22μ2λ0,02HR22/3α1,where μ=me∗mh∗/(me∗+mh∗) is the reduced electron-hole pair effective mass.


## 4. Result and Discussion

Let us proceed to the discussion of the results. Note that the numerical calculations are made for the conical QD from GaAs with the following parameters:me∗=0.067me, κ=13.18, ER=5.275meV, and aB=104Å. Figure 2 shows the dependence of the energy levels of the charge carrier from the base radius of CQD for the fixed value of the CQD’s height.Figure 2
The dependence of the energy levels of the electron from the base radius of CQD for the fixed value of the height.Note that each level of the “fast” subsystem has a family of “slow” subsystem levels positioned thereupon. One can see from Figure2 with increasing base radius energy of the particle reduces, since the contribution to the energy of the size quantization decreases. The difference between the energy levels of the same energy level’s family is increased with increase in the axial quantum number. For example, ΔE10=1.12ER, when R=1.5aB and H=10aB (nρ=0, m=0), and ΔE10=3.4ER, when R=1.5aB and H=10aB (nρ=1, m=0). Note that the transition frequency between these energy levels is ΔΩ10 (nρ=0, m=0) = 1.43·1012c-1 and ΔΩ10 (nρ=1, m=0) = 4.3·1012c-1, which falls into the IR part of spectrum.Figure3 shows the dependence of the energy levels of the electron from the height of CQD for the fixed value of the CQD’s base radius. The dependence of the energy levels on the height of CQD has the same behaviour as the dependence of radius: with the increase of the height energy levels are reduced.Figure 3
The dependence of the energy levels of the electron from the height of CQD for the fixed value of the base radius.Note that the total energy of the system is more “sensitive” to changes of theR parameter, which is a consequence of the higher contribution of size quantization into the electron energy in radial direction. The same increase in the difference between the energy levels of the same energy level’s family occurs for this dependence. For example, ΔE10=0.58ER, when R=2aB and H=15aB (nρ=0, m=0), and ΔE10=1.76ER, when R=2aB and H=15aB (nρ=1, m=0).Figure4 shows the dependence of absorption edge on the base radius of CQD for the fixed value of height in the regime of strong size quantization. As can be seen from the figure, with decreasing base radius of CQD, the absorption edge increases. It is the consequence of the following: with the decrease of parameter R the effective width of the bandgap increases by reducing the influence of the CQD’s walls. The energy levels corresponding to high values of height are located above. Note that the interband transition frequency between energy levels is Ω000=5.07·1014c-1 for R=0.2aB and H=15aB which falls into the visible part of spectrum.Figure 4
The dependence of absorption edge on the base radius of CQD for the fixed value of height.Figure5 shows the dependence of absorption edge on the height of CQD for the fixed value of base radius in the regime of strong size quantization. For the same reason as we mentioned for Figure 4 with increasing height of CQD, the absorption edge increases. Here the energy levels corresponding to small values of base radius are located above.Figure 5
The dependence of absorption edge on the height of CQD for the fixed value of base radius.Consider selection rules for transitions between levels with different quantum numbers. For the magnetic quantum number transitions between the levels withm=-m′are allowed, and for the radial quantum number nρ transitions between the levels with nρ=nρ′ are allowed. Consequently, there is no selection rule for the principal quantum number and any transitions between different levels are allowed: n→∀n′.


## 5. Conclusion

Summarizing, the electronic states and optical properties of CQD made of GaAs are studied. The dependence of energy levels on the geometrical parameters of CQD is obtained analytically with the help of adiabatic approximation. Each level of the “fast” subsystem has a family of “slow” subsystem levels positioned thereupon. Note that the intraband transition frequency between energy levels falls into the IR part of spectrum, while the interband transition frequency falls into the visible part of spectrum. It is shown that for radial quantum numbers transitions are allowed between the levels with the same quantum numbers, and for the principal quantum number any transitions between different levels are allowed.



---

*Source: 915742-2015-11-22.xml*