# Influence of Variable Thermal Conductivity on MHD Boundary Layer Slip Flow of Ethylene-Glycol Based Cu Nanofluids over a Stretching Sheet with Convective Boundary Condition

Authors: N. Bhaskar Reddy; T. Poornima; P. Sreenivasulu
Journal: International Journal of Engineering Mathematics
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

An analysis is carried out to investigate the influence of variable thermal conductivity and partial velocity slip on hydromagnetic two-dimensional boundary layer flow of a nanofluid with Cu nanoparticles over a stretching sheet with convective boundary condition. Using similarity transformation, the governing boundary layer equations along with the appropriate boundary conditions are transformed to a set of ordinary differential equations. Employing Runge-kutta fourth-order method along with shooting technique, the resultant system of equations is solved. The influence of various pertinent parameters such as nanofluid volume fraction parameter, the magnetic parameter, radiation parameter, thermal conductivity parameter, velocity slip parameter, Biot number, and suction or injection parameter on the velocity of the flow field and heat transfer characteristics is computed numerically and illustrated graphically. The present results are compared with the existing results for the case of regular fluid and found an excellent agreement.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The flow analysis of nanofluids has been the topic of extensive research, due to its enhanced thermal conductivity behavior in heat transfer processes. Nanofluid is a new class of heat transfer fluid (the term nanofluid was coined by Choi [1]) that contains a base fluid and nanosized material particles (diameter less than 100 nm) or fibers suspended in the ordinary fluids. Nanoparticles are made from various materials, such as oxide ceramics (Al2O3, CuO), nitride ceramics (AlN, SiN), carbide ceramics (SiC, TiC), metals (Cu, Ag, Au), semiconductors, (TiO2, SiC), carbon nanotubes, and composite materials such as alloyed nanoparticles or nanoparticle core-polymer shell composites. According to Prodanovi et al. [2], nanofluids containing ultrafine nanoparticle have the capability of flowing in porous media, and these flows can improve oil recovery; hence, nanoparticles are able to control the processes of oil recovery. To improve oil recovery of viscous oils, a fluid, for example, water, is injected into the porous medium to displace the oil, since water viscosity is inferior to that of oil. However, increasing the injected fluid viscosity using nanofluids would drastically increase the recovery efficiency. Nanoparticles can also be used to determine changes in fluid saturation and reservoir properties during oil and gas production.Many studies on nanofluids are being conducted by scientists and engineers due to their diverse technical and biomedical applications. Examples include nanofluid coolant (electronics cooling, vehicle cooling, and so on), medical applications (cancer therapy and safer surgery by cooling), process industries (materials and chemicals, detergency, food and drink, oil and gas, paper and printing, and textiles), advances in nanoelectronics, nanophotonics, and nanomagnetics; ultrahigh performance cooling is necessary for many industrial technologies.The nanofluids are more stable and have acceptable viscosity and better wetting, spreading, and dispersion properties on solid surface [3, 4]. The characteristic feature of nanofluids is thermal conductivity enhancement, a phenomenon observed by Masuda et al. [5]. This phenomenon suggests the possibility of using nanofluids in advanced nuclear systems (Buongiorno and Hu [6]). A benchmark study on the thermal conductivity of nanofluids was made by Buongiorno et al. [7]. Das et al. [8] studied a two- to fourfold increase in thermal conductivity enhancement for water-based nanofluids containing Al2O3 or CuO nanoparticles over a small temperature range, 21°C–51°C.The study of boundary layer flow and heat transfer over a stretching surface has attracted considerable attention in many fields of science and technology. Few of these applications, such as wire and fiber coating, materials manufactured polymer extrusion, food stuff processing, drawing of copper wires, and chemical processing equipment. Pioneering work on the dynamics of boundary layer flow over stretching surface was done by Crane [9], who examined the two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations. Later on, various aspects of the problem have been investigated by Dutta et al. [10], and Chen and Char [11]. Khan and Pop [12] presented the boundary layer flow of nanofluid past a stretching sheet. Recently, Hassani et al. [13] studied an analytical solution for boundary layer flow of a nanofluid past a stretching sheet. Rana and Bhargava [14] analyzed the flow and heat transfer over a nonlinear stretching sheet, a numerical study. Hamad and Ferdows [15] studied the similarity solution of boundary layer stagnation-point flow towards a heated porous stretching sheet saturated with a nanofluid with heat absorption/generation and suction/blowing: a Lie group analysis.Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) boundary layer flow over a stretching sheet is important during the last few decades due to its numerous applications in industrial manufacturing processes such as the aerodynamic extrusion of plastic sheets, liquid film, hot rolling, wire drawing, and glass-fiber and paper production. Al-Odat et al. [16] analyzed the thermal boundary layer on an exponentially stretching continuous surface in the presence of magnetic field effect. Chamkha and Aly [17] have presented the MHD free convection flow of a nanofluid past a vertical plate in the presence of heat generation or absorption effects. Later, Aliakbar et al. [18] analyzed the influence of thermal radiation on MHD flow of Maxwellian fluids above stretching sheets. Khan et al. [19] studied the effects of magnetic field on radiative flow of a nanofluid past a stretching sheet. Ibrahim and Shankar [20] analyzed MHD boundary layer flow and heat transfer of a nanofluid past a permeable stretching sheet with slip conditions.However, radiation heat transfer has a key impact in high temperature regime. Many technological processes occur at high temperature and good working knowledge of radiative heat transfer plays an instrumental role in designing the pertinent equipment. In many practical applications depending on the surfaces properties and solid geometry, the radiative transport is often comparable with that of convective heat transfer. But, unfortunately, little is known about the effects of radiation on the boundary layer flow of a radiating fluid. In fact, a few difficulties arise in studying radiative fluid flow. Firstly, when radiative heat transfer takes place, the radiation is absorbed/emitted not only at system boundaries but also in the interior of the system; hence, prediction of fluid absorption is a difficult task. Secondly, the absorption coefficient of the absorbing emitting fluids is, in general, strongly dependent on wavelength. Thirdly, presence of radiation term in the energy equation makes the equation highly nonlinear. This all leads to computational difficulty. Owing to these difficulties, the effect of radiation on convective flows has been investigated with reasonable simplifications. A good literature on radiative transfer can be seen in well-presented texts by Sparrow and Cess [21] Özisik [22], Siegel and Howell [23], and Howell [24]. Takhar et al. [25] studied radiation effect on the free convection flow of a gas past a semi-infinite plate. Hossain and Takhar [26] investigated mixed convection along a vertical plate with uniform surface temperature taking radiation into account.The nonadherence of the fluid to a solid boundary, known as velocity slip, is a phenomenon that has been observed under certain circumstances [27]. It is a well-known fact that a viscous fluid normally sticks to the boundary. But, there are many fluids, for example, particulate fluids, rarefied gas etc., where there may be a slip between the fluid and the boundary [28]. The effects of slip conditions are very important in technological applications such as in the polishing of artificial heart valves and the internal cavities [29]. The foremost study taking into account the slip boundary condition over a stretching sheet was conducted by Anderson [30]. A closed form solution of full Navier-Stokes equations for a hydrodynamic flow over a stretching sheet was studied by him. Next to Anderson, Wang [31] solved the full Navier-Stokes’ equations with partial slip past a stretching sheet. He continues to investigate stagnation slip flow and heat transfer on a moving plate [32]. Fang et al. [33] analyzed the slip condition of a MHD viscous flow over a stretching sheet. Hayat et al. [34] extended the problem of the previous researchers by incorporating the thermal slip condition and discussed unsteady magneto hydrodynamic flow and heat transfer over a permeable stretching sheet with slip condition also. In a similar way, Abu Bakar et al. [35] studied the boundary layer flow over a stretching sheet with a convective boundary condition and slip effect.But so far, no attempt has been made to analyze the effects of variable thermal conductivity and velocity slip on MHD boundary layer flow of Ethylene-Glycol based Cu nanofluids over a stretching sheet with convective boundary condition. Thus, the problem is investigated. The surface exhibits convective heating boundary conditions [36–42]. Recently, Alsaedi et al. [43] studied the effects of heat generation/absorption on stagnation point flow of nanofluid over a surface with convective boundary conditions. Masood Khan et al. [44] investigated the MHD Falkner-Skan flow with mixed convection and convective boundary conditions. An efficient numerical shooting technique with a fourth-order Runge-Kutta scheme as used to solve the normalized boundary layer equations and the effects of material parameters on the flow field and heat transfer characteristics is discussed in detail.


## 2. Mathematical Analysis

A two-dimensional steady laminar boundary layer flow of a viscous incompressible flow of nanofluid past a permeable stretching sheet coinciding with the planey=0 is considered. The flow is confirmed to y>0. The fluid is assumed to be gray, absorbing-emitting radiation but nonscattering medium. The flow is generated due to stretching of the sheet, caused by the simultaneous application of two equal and opposite forces along the x-axis. Keeping the origin fixed, the sheet is then stretched with velocity uw(x)=ax, where a is constant. A uniform magnetic field is applied in the direction transverse to the stretching surface. The transverse applied magnetic field and magnetic Reynolds number are assumed to be very small, so that the induced magnetic field is negligible. There is a constant suction/injection velocity Vw normal to the sheet. The temperature of sheet surface (to be determined later) is the result of a convective heating process which is characterized by a temperature Tf and a heat transfer coefficient hf. It is to be mentioned that the hole size (in nanoscale) of porous sheet is taken to be constant. The fluid is ethylene-glycol based nanofluid containing copper (Cu). The nanofluid is assumed incompressible and flow is assumed to be laminar. A schematic representation of the physical model and coordinate system is depicted in Figure 1. Under the usual assumptions, the governing boundary layer equations are given by
(1)∂u∂x+∂v∂y=0(2)u∂u∂x+v∂u∂y=1ρnfμnf∂2u∂y2+gρβnf(T-T∞)-σB02u(3)u∂T∂x+v∂T∂y=1ρCpnf∂∂yknf*∂T∂y-qr.
The boundary conditions for the velocity and temperature fields are
(4)u=uw+A∂u∂y,v=-vw,-kf∂T∂y=hfTf-T∞aty=0u⟶0,T⟶T∞asy⟶∞,
where u and v are the velocity components in the x and y directions, respectively, T is the temperature of the nanofluid, T∞ is the ambient fluid temperature, g is the acceleration due to gravity, σ is the electric conductivity, B0 is the uniform magnetic field strength, and qr is the radiative heat flux. A is the velocity slip factor. vw is the wall mass flux with vw<0 for suction and vw>0 for injection, respectively. kf is the thermal conductivity of the ordinary fluid and Tf is the temperature of the hot fluid.Figure 1
Physical model of the system.It should be mentioned that such slip conditions were recently used in a series of papers [45–50]. It is worth mentioning at this end that fluid flow with slip is important in microelectromechanical systems (MEMS). The flow in these systems deviates significantly from the traditional no slip flow because of the microscale dimensions of these devices. MEMS barometers and commercially compatible flexible printed circuit boards are examples for stretchable MEMS [51].The variable thermal conductivity (Arunachalam and Rajappa [52], Chiam [53] and Seddeek and Salem [54]) is considered to vary linearly with temperature as given below
(5)k*=k1+∈θ,
where k is thermal conductivity parameter.The effective density of the nanofluid is given by(6)ρnf=1-ϕρf+ϕρs,
where ϕ is the solid volume fraction of nanoparticles. Thermal diffusivity of nanofluid is
(7)αnf=knfρCpnf,
where the heat capacitance Cp of the nanofluid is obtained as
(8)ρCpnf=1-ϕρCpf+ϕρCps.
The thermal conductivity of the nanofluid knf for spherical nanoparticles can be written as (Maxwell [55])
(9)knfkf=(ks+2kf)-2ϕ(kf-ks)(ks+2kf)+ϕ(kf-ks).
The thermal expansion coefficient of the nanofluid can be determined by
(10)ρβnf=1-ϕρβf+ϕρβs.
Also the effective dynamic viscosity of the nanofluid given by Brinkman [56] can be written as
(11)μnf=μf1-ϕ2.5.
Here the subscripts nf, f, and s represent the thermophysical properties of the nanofluids, base fluid, and nanosolid particles, respectively (Table 1).Table 1
Thermophysical properties of fluid and nanoparticles [55, 56].
Physical properties
Fluid phase (ethylene-glycol)
Cu
Cp (J/kg K)
1114.4
385
ρ (kg/m3)
2415
8933
β
×
1
0
-
5 (1/K)
65
1.67
k (W/m K)
0.252
401By using the Rosseland diffusion approximation (Prasad et al. [57]), the radiative heat flux is given by
(12)qr=-43σ*k*∂T4∂y,
where σ* is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant and k* is the mean absorption coefficient. It should be noted that, by using the Rosseland approximation, the present analysis is limited to optically thick fluids. Taking the refractive index of the gas medium to be constant, unidirectional radiation flux qr is considered and it is assumed that ∂qr/∂y≫∂qr/∂x. This model is valid for optically thick media in which thermal radiation propagates only a limited distance prior to experiencing scattering or absorption. The local thermal radiation intensity is due to radiation emitting from proximate locations in the vicinity of which emission and scattering are comparable to the location of interest. The energy transfer depends on conditions only in the area adjacent to the plate regime, that is, the boundary layer regime. Rosseland’s model yields accurate results for intensive absorption, that is, optically thick flows which are optically far from the boundary surface. Implicit in this approximation is also the existence of wavelength regions where the optical thickness may exceed a value of five. As such, the Rosseland model, while limited compared with other flux models, can simulate to a reasonable degree of accuracy thermal radiation in problems ranging from thermal radiation transport via gases at low density to thermal radiation simulations associated with nuclear blast waves. If the temperature differences within the flow are sufficiently small, then (12) can be linearized by expanding T4 into the Taylor series about T∞, which after neglecting higher-order terms takes the form
(13)T4≅4T∞3T-3T∞4.
In view of (12) and (13), (3) becomes
(14)u∂T∂x+v∂T∂y=αnf1+∈θ+43Nr∂2T∂y2+∈Tf-T∞∂T∂y2,
where Nr=16σ*T∞3/3knfk* is the radiation parameter.To get similarity solutions of (1)–(3) subject to the boundary conditions (4), we introduce the following similarity transformations:
(15)η=aνf1/2y,u=axf′(η),v=-aνf1/2,θ=T-T∞Tf-T∞,M=σB02aρf,λ=gρβf(Tf-T∞)ρfauw,Nr=4σ*T∞3k*knf,Pr⁡=νfαf,S=-vwaνf,δ=Aaνf,Γ=hfkfνfa,
where νf is the kinematic viscosity of the base fluid.In view of (15), (1), (2), and (14) take the following dimensionless form:
(16)f′′′1-ϕ2.51-ϕ+ϕρβsρβf1-ϕ+ϕρsρfff′′-f′2vvvvvvvvvvvv+1-ϕ+ϕρβsρβfλθ-Mf′=01+43Nrθ′′+∈θθ′′+∈θ′2+Pr⁡kfknf1-ϕ+ϕρCpsρCpffθ′=0,
where prime denotes the differentiation with respect to η.The corresponding boundary conditions are(17)f′0=1+δf′′0,f0=S,θ′0=-Γ1-θ0f′(∞)⟶0,θ(∞)⟶0.
The quantities of practical interest in this study are the skin friction or the shear stress coefficient Cf and the local Nusselt number Nux, which are defined as
(18)Cf=-μnfρfuw2∂u∂yy=0Nux=xknfkfTw-T∞-∂T∂yy=0.
Using (6), the skin friction coefficient and local Nusselt number can be expressed as
(19)Rex1/2Cf=-11-ϕ2.5f′′(0)Rex1/2Nux=-knfkfθ′0,
where Rex=uwx/νf is the Reynolds number.


## 3. Results and Discussion

The coupled nonlinear differential equations (16) along with the boundary conditions (17) are solved numerically using Runge-Kutta fourth order technique along with shooting method. The integration length η∞ varies with the parameter values and it has been suitably chosen each time such that the boundary conditions at the outer edge of the boundary layer are satisfied. In order to bring out the salient features of the flow and the heat transfer characteristics in the Cu-EG based nanofluid, the numerical values for different values of the governing parameters ϕ, M, ∈, Nr, δ, S, and Γ are computed and portrayed in Figures 2–13.Figure 2
Comparison of temperature profiles for differentΓ.Figure 3
Temperature profiles for different values ofϕ.Figure 4
Velocity profiles for different values ofϕ.Figure 5
Temperature profiles for different values ofϕ.Figure 6
Velocity profiles for different values ofM.Figure 7
Temperature profiles for different values ofM.Figure 8
Temperature profiles for different values of∈.Figure 9
Temperature profiles for different values ofNr.Figure 10
Velocity profiles for different values ofδ.Figure 11
Temperature profiles for different values ofδ.Figure 12
Velocity profiles for different values ofS.Figure 13
Temperature profiles for different values ofS.In order to validate our analysis, the present results are compared with the existing results for the case of regular fluid and found an excellent agreement (Figure2).Figure3 shows the temperature profiles for different values of the nanoparticle volume fraction ϕ with water and EG based nanofluids. It is found that the temperature increases with an increase in the nanoparticle volume fraction for both Cu-water and Cu-EG based fluid. And also it is noticed that EG based nanofluids have more impact in rising the temperature than that of water-based nanofluids. This is due to the fact that the thermal conductivity increases and then the thermal boundary layer thickness increases with the increase in volume of nanoparticles. Also it is observed that the thermal conductivity is more in ethylene-glycol based nanofluid when compared to water-based nanofluid.Figures4 and 5 represent the influence of the nanoparticle volume fraction on the velocity and temperature. It is found that both the nanofluid velocity and the temperature increase with an increase in nanoparticle volume fraction. These figures illustrate in agreement with the physical behavior that the thermal conductivity increases and then the thermal boundary layer thickness increases with the increase in volume of nanoparticles.Effect of the magnetic parameterM on the velocity and temperature profiles is shown in Figures 6 and 7, respectively. It is observed that the velocity decreases as the magnetic parameter increases (Figure 6). The presence of magnetic field, normal to the flow in an electrically conducting fluid, gives rise to a resistive type of force called Lorentz force, which retards the fluid flow. This resistive force controls the nanofluids velocity which is useful in numerous applications such as magnetohydrodynamic power generation and electromagnetic coating of wires and metal. Since the magnetic parameter is inversely proportional to density, so, for ascending M, ρ descends, thus increasing the temperature of the fluid (Figure 7).Figure8 illustrates the temperature profiles for various values of thermal conductivity parameter ∈. It is clear from our definition that k*>k; that is, the thermal conductivity is higher when ∈>0 and hence an increase in ∈ results in increase of thermal conductivity, thereby raising the temperature.The influence of effect of radiation parameterNr on temperature is portrayed in Figure 9. The effect of Nr is prominently seen throughout the boundary layer. It is interesting to observe that the effect of Nr is to increase the temperature distribution. The radiation parameter (reciprocal of Stephan number) is the measure of relative importance of thermal radiation transfer to the conduction heat transfer. Thus larger values of N sound dominance of thermal radiation over conduction. Consequently larger values of N are indicative of larger amount of radiative heat energy being poured into the system, causing rise in θ(η).Figures10 and 11 demonstrate the variation of the streamwise velocity and temperature for different values of slip parameter δ. As the slip parameter increases, the slip at the surface wall increases and a smaller amount of penetration occurs due to the stretching surface into the fluid. In the no slip condition, δ approaches zero; then f′(0)=1. It is clear from the figures that the velocity component at the wall reduces with an increase in the slip parameter δ and decreases asymptotically to zero at the edge of the hydrodynamic boundary layer. Thus hydrodynamic boundary layer thickness decreases as the slip parameter δ increases for both the regular and nanofluids and, as a result, the local velocity also decreases. This is in agreement with the fact that higher δ implies an increase in the lubrication and slipperiness of the surface. On the other hand, it is evident from Figure 11 that the surface slipperiness affects the temperature of the fluid inversely; that is, an increase with slip parameter tends to increase temperature of the fluid. By escalating δ, thermal boundary layer thickness enhances. So, we can interpret that the rate of heat transfer decreases with the increase in slip parameter δ.The effect of suction or injection parameterS on the velocity and temperature is shown in Figures 12 and 13, respectively. It is observed that the velocity decreases with increase in the suction/injection parameter. The physical explanation for such behavior is as follows: in case of suction, the heated fluid is pushed towards the wall where the buoyancy forces can act to retard the fluid due to high influence of the viscosity (Figure 12). The thermal boundary layer thickness for the injection is more pronounced than for suction and it is quite superior for Cu-EG than for pure water (regular fluid, ϕ=0). Figure 13 explains that, for both suction/injection, the existence of Cu nanoparticle increases the thermal conductivity rapidly, which leads to an increase in the thickness of the thermal boundary layer. Thus the temperature of the fluid rises.Figure14 depicts the temperature profiles for different values of convective parameter Γ. It is clearly seen that the increases in the convective parameter increase the temperature profile and thereby reduce the thermal boundary layer thickness. The variations of -f′′(0) and -θ′(0) which are proportional to the local skin-friction coefficient and rate of heat transfers are shown in Tables 2–7. From Table 2, it is found that both the wall skin friction coefficient and heat transfer rate at the surface decrease as ϕ increases. From Table 3, it is observed that the skin friction coefficient at the wall decreases with an increase in the parameter ∈ for both regular fluid and nanofluid. Also it is seen that the rate of heat transfer decreases with an increase in the value of ∈. This happens due to the fact that with the increase in ε the thermal conductivity increases which lowers the temperature gradient at the plate surface. From Table 4, it is clear that both the skin friction and heat transfer rate decrease with an increase in the radiation parameter Nr.Table 2
Values of-f′′(0) and -θ′(0) for various values of ϕ.
ϕ
-
f
′
′
(
0
)
-
θ
′
(
0
)
0.0
1.177071
0.0955225
0.05
1.093940
0.0951172
0.10
1.013062
0.0947067
0.15
0.934425
0.0942881
0.2
0.858128
0.0938579Table 3
Values of-f′′(0) and -θ′(0) for various values of ϕ and ∈.
ϕ
∈
-
f
′
′
(
0
)
-
θ
′
(
0
)
0.0
0.0
1.17702
0.0955518
0.3
1.17691
0.0952439
0.5
1.17684
0.0950191
0.7
1.17675
0.0947772
1.0
1.1766
0.0943792
0.1
0.0
1.01307
0.0945435
0.3
1.01298
0.0942011
0.5
1.01292
0.0939533
0.7
1.01285
0.0936886
1.0
1.01273
0.0932570Table 4
Values of-f′′(0) and -θ′(0) for various values of ϕ and Nr.
ϕ
Nr
-
f
′
′
(
0
)
-
θ
′
(
0
)
0.0
1.5
1.17585
0.0931194
2.0
1.17523
0.0920499
3.0
1.17396
0.0900892
4.0
1.17269
0.0883290
5.0
1.17147
0.0867510
0.1
1.0
1.01157
0.0921196
2.0
1.01090
0.0909412
3.0
1.00953
0.0888097
4.0
1.00821
0.0869363
5.0
1.00698
0.0852933Table 5
Values of-f′′(0) and -θ′(0) for various values of ϕ and S.
ϕ
S
-
f
′
′
(
0
)
-
θ
′
(
0
)
0.0
0.3
1.17701
0.0955225
0.2
1.13491
0.0948018
0.1
1.09395
0.0938647
0.0
1.05412
0.092619
−0.1
1.01538
0.0909242
−0.2
0.97764
0.0885645
−0.3
0.940748
0.0852126
0.1
0.3
1.26325
0.0945107
0.2
1.20846
0.0936994
0.1
1.1555
0.0926697
0.0
1.10444
0.0913403
−0.1
1.05532
0.0895938
−0.2
1.00811
0.0872611
−0.3
0.962756
0.0841031Table 6
Values of-f′′(0) and -θ′(0) for various values of ϕ and δ.
ϕ
δ
-
f
′
′
(
0
)
-
θ
′
(
0
)
0.0
0.0
1.38291
0.0956796
0.3
0.917088
0.0952758
0.5
0.756782
0.0950839
0.7
0.646713
0.0949264
1.0
0.532992
0.0947331
0.1
0.0
1.51052
0.0947236
0.3
0.96444
0.0941837
0.5
0.786612
0.0939336
0.7
0.66708
0.0937302
1.0
0.545629
0.0934822Table 7
Values of-f′′(0) and -θ′(0) for various values of ϕ and Γ.
ϕ
Γ
-
f
′
′
(
0
)
-
θ
′
(
0
)
0.0
0.1
1.17701
0.0955225
0.3
1.17516
0.262626
0.5
1.17355
0.403359
0.7
1.17215
0.523035
1.0
1.17036
0.67177
0.1
0.1
1.26325
0.0945107
0.3
1.26147
0.255081
0.5
1.25999
0.385787
0.7
1.25873
0.493837
1.0
1.25719
0.624363Figure 14
Temperature profiles for different values ofΓ.Table5 shows the effects of wall skin friction and rate of heat transfer with suction/injection parameter S for regular fluid and nanofluid. It is evident that increasing suction (S>0) at the wall tends to have high heat transfer rate but injection (S<0) decreases heat transfer rate. It is also noted that the addition of nanoparticle produces a remarkable enhancement on heat transfer with respect to that of pure fluid.From Table6, we notice that the skin friction coefficient at the wall decreases with an increase in the slip parameter δ for both regular fluid and nanofluid. This is less pronounced with an increase in the value of δ. That is, as expected, for the fluid flows at nanoscales, the shear stress at the wall decreases with an increase in the slip parameter δ. It is noticed that, in the no slip condition problem, the highest wall shear stress occurs. Table 7 shows the effects of surface skin friction and rate of heat transfer with parameter Γ for regular fluid and nanofluid. It is evident that the surface skin friction decreases but the heat transfer rate decreases with an increase in convection parameter Γ.



---

*Source: 905158-2014-11-06.xml*