# Poly(acrylonitrile-co-butadiene-co-styrene) Reinforced with Hollow Glass Microspheres: Evaluation of Extrusion Parameters and Their Effects on the Composite Properties

Authors: Marina Panozzo Cunha; Laura Berasain Gonella; Matheus Poletto; Ana Maria Colon Grisa; Rosmary Nichele Brandalise
Journal: Journal of Polymers
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

Hollow glass microspheres (HGMs) filled poly(acrylonitrile-co-butadiene-co-styrene) (ABS) composites were prepared by means of a twin-screw extruder. S038 HGMs were incorporated at different percentages of 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 wt%. The HGMs were added into the twin-screw extruder at two different feeding zones, and the effect of HGMs loading and specific feeding zone addition on the composites produced was evaluated with regard to morphological, thermal, rheological, physical, and mechanical properties. As a result, the composite density was reduced while the thermal stability, storage modulus, complex viscosity, and tensile and flexural modulus were improved when compared with the ABS matrix. The results also indicate that the addition of 5.0 wt% of HGMs at the feeding zone closer to the die maintains the integrity of the HGMs and promotes composites with higher mechanical properties and lower density when compared with the composites obtained with the addition of HGMs closer to the hopper.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Marine, aerospace, and automotive structural applications strive for low density materials having high strength, modulus, and damage tolerance [1–3]. In addition, the regulatory requirements on low CO2 emission and environmental concerns [2] are a challenge for automotive industries to promote vehicle weight reduction without compromise of its performance. Polymer composite materials reinforced with hollow glass microspheres are generally designed to comprise low density materials with higher mechanical performance [2–6].Poly(acrylonitrile-co-butadiene-co-styrene) (ABS) is employed in the automotive industry, normally in the interior of vehicles as a function of its impact strength and outstanding balance between strain, modulus of elasticity, and tensile and flexural strength, combined to its low cost [4, 7]. Specific properties designed for different applications result from changes in proportions and monomers applied in its polymerization [8–11]. Acrylonitrile monomer contributes to the property of thermal and chemical resistance, while butadiene monomer provides impact resistance and flexibility and styrene monomer adds to processability and stiffness [9].Hollow glass microspheres (HGMs) are used to reduce weight and to impart specific properties to polymer materials for various applications [2]. HGMs are characterized by being hollow glass spheres having average diameter of 15 to 65 mm with very thin walls of 0.5 to 1.5 mm and mainly of density from 0.12 to 0.60 g·cm−3, the addition of these spheres causing in general nearly no effect when processing the composite in view of the low amounts incorporated [10].Several thermoplastic composites reinforced with HGMs were prepared in a conventional screw extruder, batch mixer, or injection molding. Liang [4] studied the mechanical properties of three types of ABS composites filled with hollow glass beads with different sizes and size distributions using a twin-screw extruder. The author observed that the mechanical properties increase at filler volume fraction of 5%, and the effects of filler size and its distribution on the mechanical properties evaluated are not significant. In a more recent study, Liang and coworkers [12] evaluated the correlation between impact strength and surface fracture dimension for ABS filled with hollow glass beads. The authors verified that the IZOD impact strength of the composite decreases quickly with increasing volume fraction of the filler for the volume fraction from 0 to 5%. In addition, the surface fractal dimension was an exponential function of the impact strength of the ABS/hollow glass bead composites. However, the effect of different extruder feeding zones on the properties of ABS reinforced by HGMs processed at a twin-screw extruder has not been fully explored. The twin-screw extruder can promote a more disperse and distributed mixing of the HGMs into the polymer matrix which may promote lighter composites with higher mechanical properties.So the present work aims at developing ABS composites with different HGM loading in a twin-screw extruder, evaluating the effect of the addition of HGM at two different extruder feeding zones on the morphological, thermal, rheological, physical, and mechanical properties of the composites. The developed composite has potential application in the automobile industry, based on the reduction of composite density and improvement in the mechanical properties evaluated.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Materials

ABS SV-0165 is supplied by Samsung Starex, China, with impact strength (ASTM D256-10) of 245 J·m−1. Hollow glass microsphere (HGM), type S038HS, without surface treatment is supplied by 3M™ of Brazil (Glass Bubbles®). HGM density is 0.98 g·cm−3 and compression strength is 34.5 MPa. For measurement the composite density used ethanol PA supplied by Merck with purity equal to 99.9%.


### 2.2. Procedure for the Preparation of Composites

ABS SV-165 was dried in a Marconi (Brazil) oven, with air circulation for 24 hours at 60°C [13]. Composites were processed in MH Equipamentos (Brazil) and corotating and interpenetrating twin-screw extruder with length/diameter (L/D) ratio of 32 mm and 20 mm screw with rotating speed 100 rpm and temperature profile 200-200-230-240°C [13]. HGM incorporation into the composites during extrusion at the percentages of 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 wt% was performed at two distinct feeding zones:(i)
Z1 feeding point: incorporation of ABS SV-0165 and HGM at the extruder feeding point, dosage performed with volumetric feeder.
(ii)
Z2 feeding point: HGM incorporation at the central extruder zone, the incorporation being performed with MH Equipamentos (Brazil) side feeder. ABS SV-0165 was incorporated at the (Z1) extruder feeding zone (Figure1).Figure 1
(a) HGM incorporation at the feeding zone with 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 wt.% HGM + ABS incorporated at Z1; (b) incorporation of HGM at the central extruder zone (Z2) with 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 wt.% HGM and ABS incorporated at Z1.
(a)
(b)Compositions used in this study are listed in Table1.Table 1
Codification and composition of the ABS composites with hollow glass spheres and double screw extruder feeding zones.
Samples
HGM (wt.%)
Incorporation zone HGM
ABS2.5-Z1-S038
2.5
Z1
ABS5.0-Z1-S038
5.0
Z1
ABS7.5-Z1-S038
7.5
Z1
ABS2.5-Z2-S038
2.5
Z2
ABS5.0-Z2-S038
5.0
Z2
ABS7.5-Z2-S038
7.5
Z2


### 2.3. Characterization of Materials and Composites

Plates were produced by compression molding at the dimensions of 165 × 95 × 3 mm in a model 30010-4-1 (Brazil) press, at a pressure of 60 bar for 12 minutes, and at 170°C and cooled to 60°C [11]. Specimens for mechanical tests were obtained from plates cut using a band saw.Morphological characterization was performed in a Shimadzu (Japan) scanning electron microscope (SEM) at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV, fractured by liquid nitrogen, the surface to be tested being coated with gold.Density was evaluated in accordance with the ASTM D4052-95 Method by the pycnometer method. HDT analysis made use of a Ceast instrument of the Polimate brand (Brazil), in accordance with the ASTM D648-07 Method.Rheological properties were analyzed in Anton Paar Physica MCR 101 (USA) parallel plate oscillating rheometer in accordance with the ASTM D7395-07 Method, with frequency variation of 0.01 and 100 rad·s−1 and temperature from 180 to 200°C under a nitrogen atmosphere, at a rate of 10°C·min−1, the test specimens having 20 mm diameter and 3 mm height [14].Tensile strength was measured in accordance with the ASTM D638-10 Method in EMIC (Brazil) instrument model DL 2000, at a speed of 50 mm·min−1 with test specimens of 165 × 13.3 × 3 mm dimensions. Flexural strength was determined in accordance with the ASTM D790-A0 Method in the same equipment cited above, at a speed of 0.9 mm·min−1 and test specimens of 127 × 12.7 × 3 mm. IZOD impact strength was measured in accordance with ASTM D256-10 Method in a Polimate model Ceast Resil equipment (Brazil) with a 4 J pendulum and 63 × 12.7 × 3 mm notch. All test specimens sides were filed with 80 grain sandpaper supplied by 3M of Brazil. The values for all mechanical properties correspond to the median of 7 test specimens.Statistical analysis (ANOVA) was performed using Excel 2010 software.


## 2.1. Materials

ABS SV-0165 is supplied by Samsung Starex, China, with impact strength (ASTM D256-10) of 245 J·m−1. Hollow glass microsphere (HGM), type S038HS, without surface treatment is supplied by 3M™ of Brazil (Glass Bubbles®). HGM density is 0.98 g·cm−3 and compression strength is 34.5 MPa. For measurement the composite density used ethanol PA supplied by Merck with purity equal to 99.9%.


## 2.2. Procedure for the Preparation of Composites

ABS SV-165 was dried in a Marconi (Brazil) oven, with air circulation for 24 hours at 60°C [13]. Composites were processed in MH Equipamentos (Brazil) and corotating and interpenetrating twin-screw extruder with length/diameter (L/D) ratio of 32 mm and 20 mm screw with rotating speed 100 rpm and temperature profile 200-200-230-240°C [13]. HGM incorporation into the composites during extrusion at the percentages of 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 wt% was performed at two distinct feeding zones:(i)
Z1 feeding point: incorporation of ABS SV-0165 and HGM at the extruder feeding point, dosage performed with volumetric feeder.
(ii)
Z2 feeding point: HGM incorporation at the central extruder zone, the incorporation being performed with MH Equipamentos (Brazil) side feeder. ABS SV-0165 was incorporated at the (Z1) extruder feeding zone (Figure1).Figure 1
(a) HGM incorporation at the feeding zone with 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 wt.% HGM + ABS incorporated at Z1; (b) incorporation of HGM at the central extruder zone (Z2) with 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 wt.% HGM and ABS incorporated at Z1.
(a)
(b)Compositions used in this study are listed in Table1.Table 1
Codification and composition of the ABS composites with hollow glass spheres and double screw extruder feeding zones.
Samples
HGM (wt.%)
Incorporation zone HGM
ABS2.5-Z1-S038
2.5
Z1
ABS5.0-Z1-S038
5.0
Z1
ABS7.5-Z1-S038
7.5
Z1
ABS2.5-Z2-S038
2.5
Z2
ABS5.0-Z2-S038
5.0
Z2
ABS7.5-Z2-S038
7.5
Z2


## 2.3. Characterization of Materials and Composites

Plates were produced by compression molding at the dimensions of 165 × 95 × 3 mm in a model 30010-4-1 (Brazil) press, at a pressure of 60 bar for 12 minutes, and at 170°C and cooled to 60°C [11]. Specimens for mechanical tests were obtained from plates cut using a band saw.Morphological characterization was performed in a Shimadzu (Japan) scanning electron microscope (SEM) at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV, fractured by liquid nitrogen, the surface to be tested being coated with gold.Density was evaluated in accordance with the ASTM D4052-95 Method by the pycnometer method. HDT analysis made use of a Ceast instrument of the Polimate brand (Brazil), in accordance with the ASTM D648-07 Method.Rheological properties were analyzed in Anton Paar Physica MCR 101 (USA) parallel plate oscillating rheometer in accordance with the ASTM D7395-07 Method, with frequency variation of 0.01 and 100 rad·s−1 and temperature from 180 to 200°C under a nitrogen atmosphere, at a rate of 10°C·min−1, the test specimens having 20 mm diameter and 3 mm height [14].Tensile strength was measured in accordance with the ASTM D638-10 Method in EMIC (Brazil) instrument model DL 2000, at a speed of 50 mm·min−1 with test specimens of 165 × 13.3 × 3 mm dimensions. Flexural strength was determined in accordance with the ASTM D790-A0 Method in the same equipment cited above, at a speed of 0.9 mm·min−1 and test specimens of 127 × 12.7 × 3 mm. IZOD impact strength was measured in accordance with ASTM D256-10 Method in a Polimate model Ceast Resil equipment (Brazil) with a 4 J pendulum and 63 × 12.7 × 3 mm notch. All test specimens sides were filed with 80 grain sandpaper supplied by 3M of Brazil. The values for all mechanical properties correspond to the median of 7 test specimens.Statistical analysis (ANOVA) was performed using Excel 2010 software.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Morphological Properties

SEM micrographs of the 7.5 wt% HGM composites are shown in Figure2 with incorporation at the feeding zone (Z1) and at the central feeding zone (Z2).Figure 2
SEM micrographs of the 7.5% mass HGM composites fractured section (a) with reinforcement incorporation at the extruder feeding zone (Z1) of ABS7.5/Z1/S038 composite and (b) insert expanding the region of interaction between HGM and ABS of the ABS7.5/Z1/S038 composite (c) with reinforcement incorporation at the extruder central zone (Z2) of the ABS7.5/Z2/S038 composite and (d) insert expanding the region of interaction between HGM and ABS of the ABS7.5/Z2/S038 composite.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)In Figure2(a) it is possible to observe that some HGMs were removed from the matrix at the time of the fracture caused by reduced chemical affinity between reinforcement and matrix. Also a homogenous distribution of HGM in ABS was observed as a result of the reinforcement incorporation at Z1.It could be seen that the HGM kept their integrity after extrusion at Z2, but considering the magnitude of Figure2(c) micrographs (350x), higher number of HGMs is noticed in the observed region, with reinforcement agglomeration, as compared with the morphology of Figure 2(a) (350x).Enlargement of the reinforcement-matrix interface is presented in Figures2(b) and 2(d), where it is possible to determine the presence of voids among the ABS matrix and the HGM, which configures a weak interaction which supports microspheres removal at the moment of fracture.Jo et al. [7] evaluated the mechanical properties of polyurethane (PU) reinforced by HGMs. The authors observed that an interaction between reinforcement and matrix was promoted by hydroxyl groups –OH of the microsphere surface with carbonyl groups (C=O) and PU methylene groups (–CH3). ABS polarity is restricted to the acrylonitrile monomer, the remaining of its structure being of a nonpolar character. In this study the interaction between matrix and reinforcement, if any, would be due to intermolecular attraction forces among these microsphere surface –OH chemical groups and acrylonitrile.


### 3.2. Density and Thermal Properties of Composites

Density and HDT values of the composites studied are presented in Table2.Table 2
Density and HDT of the composites as a function of the hollow glass microspheres percentage with ANOVA statistical analysis for the variations encountered in the study.
Samples
Density (g·cm−3)
HDT (°C)
ABS/B (control)
1.04 ± 0.001
83.3 ± 0.4
ABS2.5/Z1/SO38
1.04 ± 0.001
86.0 ± 0.7
ABS5.0/Z1/SO38
1.02 ± 0.006
82.9 ± 1.2
ABS7.5/Z1/SO38
1.06 ± 0.002
85.7 ± 1.1
ABS2.5/Z2/SO38
0.97 ± 0.004
83.5 ± 0.9
ABS5.0/Z2/SO38
0.98 ± 0.001
84.6 ± 0.9
ABS7.5/Z2/SO38
0.96 ± 0.004
83.0 ± 0.9
ANOVA-density
Source of variation
SQ
gl
MQ
F
ValueP
F critical
Significant
Z1 and Z2
0.009
11
0.01
17.78
0.002
4.965
Yes
HGM wt.%
0.009
11
0
0.008
0.992
4.256
No
2.5/5.0/7.5
ANOVA-HDT
Source of variation
SQ
gl
MQ
F
ValueP
F critical
Significant
Z1 and Z2
15.24
11
2.9
2.35
0.156
4.965
No
HGM wt.%
15.24
11
4.41
6.18
0.02
4.256
Yes
2.5/5.0/7.5Density values of samples fed at Z1 were between 1.01 and 1.06 g·cm−3. Samples fed at Z2 had density values between 0.96 and 1.01 g·cm−3, which confirm the results obtained in SEM micrographs. When the microspheres were added at Z2 their integrity was preserved, probably because the HGMs are submitted to lower shear forces when fed at this zone, as compared with those fed at Z1. As a consequence, less HGMs are broken during the extrusion process and the composite density values are lower than those observed for samples obtained from HGMs fed at Z1.The composite of lowest density among the extrudates was the ABS7.5/Z2/S038 sample with 7.5 wt% HGM, resulting in a density of 0.96 g·cm−3, which is 8% lower than that of ABS/B. For this property, the microspheres insertion location at Z2 was significant according to the statistical analysis listed in Table 2, indicating that the reinforcement integrity could have been higher at this feeding zone.HDT results at Z1 varied between 82.9 and 85.7°C and at Z2 between 81.7 and 84.6°C. HDT values obtained for HMG composites at Z1 were 2% higher than the values obtained for ABS/B, which was extruded in the absence of HGM. For composites obtained by incorporation at Z2, values were equivalent to those of ABS/B. In accordance with statistical analysis (Table2), the wt% of incorporated HGM variable was significant with regard to HDT. The change in thermal behavior by HDT, according to Scaffaro et al. [15], was attributed to the composite increased stiffness imparted by microspheres which as a consequence requires more energy for molecular mobility.


### 3.3. Rheological Properties

Rheological results are shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Storage modulus (G
′) versus angular frequency for ABS/B and for ABS with 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 wt% HGM, the reinforcement being incorporated at feeding zone (Z1) and at the extruder center (Z2).Composites obtained at Z1 (ABS2.5/Z1/S038, ABS5.0/Z1/S038, and ABS7.5/Z1/S038) and Z2 (ABS5.0/Z2/S038 and ABS7.5/Z2/S038) had superior storage modulus (G
′) values when compared with ABS/B. Storage modulus represents the amount of energy stored by a material during strain imposed by frequency at a certain temperature, indicating that the polymer relaxations can be hindered by the applied reinforcement and by the homogeneous distribution thereof in the matrix with consequent stiffness increase, while the ABS/B composite has no restrictions to molecular mobility, since it does not bear any kind of reinforcement.A further aspect to be considered for the increasedG
′ values was reported by Li et al. [16] on poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) and HGM, the homogeneous distribution of the reinforcement throughout the PBS matrix and the formation of a kind of network, the two factors being responsible for the augmented G
′ value.In Figure3 it is possible to observe that the slope of the G
′ curves for ABS/B and for the HGM composites did not alter with frequency increase at a certain temperature, this behavior having also been observed in a study by Jiang et al. [17], with ABS reinforced with calcium carbonate nanoparticles, indicating that the addition of filler did not alter neither the microstructures nor the rheological nature of ABS.Complex viscosity for ABS/B and the composites is seen in Figure4.Figure 4
Complex viscosity (η
∗) versus angular frequency for ABS/B and for ABS with 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 wt% HGM with the reinforcement incorporated at feeding zone (Z1) and at extrusion center (Z2).Complex viscosity values for Z1 composites (ABS2.5/Z1/S038 and ABS7.5/Z1/S038) were higher than those for ABS/B. At Z2, the value for the ABS5.0/Z2/S038 composite was higher than that for ABS/B. Values for the other composites were similar to those of ABS/B. According to studies by Santos et al. [8] with polyamide (PA) and organophilic montmorillonite clay, the rise in complex viscosity was attributed to flow and movement restriction of polymer chains caused by reinforcement. Complex viscosity results corroborate G
′ results, since Z1 provided higher viscosity values when compared with Z2. This results from the fact that homogenous HGM distribution in the polymer matrix is more accentuated at this feeding zone.


### 3.4. Mechanical Properties

Tensile strength and tensile modulus according to HGM loading into the composite formulations are shown in Figure5.Figure 5
Tensile strength and tensile modulus of elasticity for ABS/B and for ABS with 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 wt% HGM, the reinforcement being incorporated at the (Z1) feeding zone and at the (Z2) extruder center with statistical analysis.Reduced values for tensile strength by HGM incorporation were observed, with consequent increase in modulus of elasticity. Higher tensile strength values were observed for the composites processed at Z1 relative to Z2, which has been confirmed by statistical analysis (Figure5), in which the HGM incorporation zone significantly influenced the results obtained.Lower tensile strength values at Z2 were attributed to nonhomogeneous reinforcement distribution in the matrix, with formation of HGM agglomerates. Li et al. [16], in their studies of PBS with HGM, also attributed the diminished tensile strength to formation of reinforcement agglomeration regions.Results for composite tensile modulus (Figure5) were higher; when compared to the ABS/B control sample the best results are obtained for the ABS7.5/Z1/S038 and ABS7.5/Z2/S038 composites. The Z1 feeding zone provided the best modulus values as a function of better reinforcement distribution in the matrix, which cooperates for increased composite stiffness, as already observed by SEM micrographs and storage modulus (G
′); however this feeding zone contributes to fracturing HGMs which results in increased composite density.Figure6 shows the results obtained for flexural strength and flexural modulus.Figure 6
Flexural strength and flexural modulus of elasticity for ABS/B and for ABS with 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 wt% HGM, the reinforcement being incorporated at the (Z1) feeding zone and at the extruder center (Z2), with statistical analysis.The flexural strength is associated with the action imparted by reinforcement to the polymer matrix, and microsphere agglomerates can provide different information on flexural strength, as well as the absence of these agglomerates at certain locations of the matrix. Yalcin et al. [9] by adding 18.5% of hollow glass microspheres and wood flour to a HDPE composite observed a 21% reduction in flexural strength; this results from the fact that reinforcement reduces the flexibility of the polymer matrix and that wood flour is a filling filler.Flexural strength results did not show any relevant differences relative to the different zones of HGM incorporation, since at both zones the value for this property was reduced. The flexural modulus increased with HGM incorporation; this increase may be attributed to stiffness imparted by the reinforcement to the matrix [18, 19] as can also be seen for tensile modulus. With the increasing of HGM loading the flexural strength decreases, and this difference is significant, as can be seen from the statistical analysis presented in Figure 6.Figure7 shows impact resistance versus the HGM percentage incorporated into the composites.Figure 7
Impact resistance for ABS/B and for ABS with 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 wt% HGM, the reinforcement being incorporated at the (Z1) feeding zone and at the extruder center (Z2), with statistical analysis.As related to the different HGM feeding zones, reduced values were observed for the impact strength at Z1, with 37% reduction for Z1, while at Z2 the reduction was 30%, both being relative to results for ABS/B. This behavior was also evidenced for results observed forG
′, in which Z1 had superior stiffness values. According to statistical analysis (Figure 7) the HGM incorporation zone was the critical variable for impact resistance reduction. Impact resistance was reduced for all the composites relative to values observed for ABS/B, since according to a study by Basurto et al. [20] with ABS and glass fiber, impact resistance reduction and modulus of elasticity rise occur as a result of increased composite stiffness. A further factor for reducing impact resistance can be attributed to ABS shear during extrusion, promoting degradation of the elastomeric phase, butadiene, which is susceptible to thermomechanical degradation and also responsible for the ABS impact strength [15–17].


## 3.1. Morphological Properties

SEM micrographs of the 7.5 wt% HGM composites are shown in Figure2 with incorporation at the feeding zone (Z1) and at the central feeding zone (Z2).Figure 2
SEM micrographs of the 7.5% mass HGM composites fractured section (a) with reinforcement incorporation at the extruder feeding zone (Z1) of ABS7.5/Z1/S038 composite and (b) insert expanding the region of interaction between HGM and ABS of the ABS7.5/Z1/S038 composite (c) with reinforcement incorporation at the extruder central zone (Z2) of the ABS7.5/Z2/S038 composite and (d) insert expanding the region of interaction between HGM and ABS of the ABS7.5/Z2/S038 composite.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)In Figure2(a) it is possible to observe that some HGMs were removed from the matrix at the time of the fracture caused by reduced chemical affinity between reinforcement and matrix. Also a homogenous distribution of HGM in ABS was observed as a result of the reinforcement incorporation at Z1.It could be seen that the HGM kept their integrity after extrusion at Z2, but considering the magnitude of Figure2(c) micrographs (350x), higher number of HGMs is noticed in the observed region, with reinforcement agglomeration, as compared with the morphology of Figure 2(a) (350x).Enlargement of the reinforcement-matrix interface is presented in Figures2(b) and 2(d), where it is possible to determine the presence of voids among the ABS matrix and the HGM, which configures a weak interaction which supports microspheres removal at the moment of fracture.Jo et al. [7] evaluated the mechanical properties of polyurethane (PU) reinforced by HGMs. The authors observed that an interaction between reinforcement and matrix was promoted by hydroxyl groups –OH of the microsphere surface with carbonyl groups (C=O) and PU methylene groups (–CH3). ABS polarity is restricted to the acrylonitrile monomer, the remaining of its structure being of a nonpolar character. In this study the interaction between matrix and reinforcement, if any, would be due to intermolecular attraction forces among these microsphere surface –OH chemical groups and acrylonitrile.


## 3.2. Density and Thermal Properties of Composites

Density and HDT values of the composites studied are presented in Table2.Table 2
Density and HDT of the composites as a function of the hollow glass microspheres percentage with ANOVA statistical analysis for the variations encountered in the study.
Samples
Density (g·cm−3)
HDT (°C)
ABS/B (control)
1.04 ± 0.001
83.3 ± 0.4
ABS2.5/Z1/SO38
1.04 ± 0.001
86.0 ± 0.7
ABS5.0/Z1/SO38
1.02 ± 0.006
82.9 ± 1.2
ABS7.5/Z1/SO38
1.06 ± 0.002
85.7 ± 1.1
ABS2.5/Z2/SO38
0.97 ± 0.004
83.5 ± 0.9
ABS5.0/Z2/SO38
0.98 ± 0.001
84.6 ± 0.9
ABS7.5/Z2/SO38
0.96 ± 0.004
83.0 ± 0.9
ANOVA-density
Source of variation
SQ
gl
MQ
F
ValueP
F critical
Significant
Z1 and Z2
0.009
11
0.01
17.78
0.002
4.965
Yes
HGM wt.%
0.009
11
0
0.008
0.992
4.256
No
2.5/5.0/7.5
ANOVA-HDT
Source of variation
SQ
gl
MQ
F
ValueP
F critical
Significant
Z1 and Z2
15.24
11
2.9
2.35
0.156
4.965
No
HGM wt.%
15.24
11
4.41
6.18
0.02
4.256
Yes
2.5/5.0/7.5Density values of samples fed at Z1 were between 1.01 and 1.06 g·cm−3. Samples fed at Z2 had density values between 0.96 and 1.01 g·cm−3, which confirm the results obtained in SEM micrographs. When the microspheres were added at Z2 their integrity was preserved, probably because the HGMs are submitted to lower shear forces when fed at this zone, as compared with those fed at Z1. As a consequence, less HGMs are broken during the extrusion process and the composite density values are lower than those observed for samples obtained from HGMs fed at Z1.The composite of lowest density among the extrudates was the ABS7.5/Z2/S038 sample with 7.5 wt% HGM, resulting in a density of 0.96 g·cm−3, which is 8% lower than that of ABS/B. For this property, the microspheres insertion location at Z2 was significant according to the statistical analysis listed in Table 2, indicating that the reinforcement integrity could have been higher at this feeding zone.HDT results at Z1 varied between 82.9 and 85.7°C and at Z2 between 81.7 and 84.6°C. HDT values obtained for HMG composites at Z1 were 2% higher than the values obtained for ABS/B, which was extruded in the absence of HGM. For composites obtained by incorporation at Z2, values were equivalent to those of ABS/B. In accordance with statistical analysis (Table2), the wt% of incorporated HGM variable was significant with regard to HDT. The change in thermal behavior by HDT, according to Scaffaro et al. [15], was attributed to the composite increased stiffness imparted by microspheres which as a consequence requires more energy for molecular mobility.


## 3.3. Rheological Properties

Rheological results are shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Storage modulus (G
′) versus angular frequency for ABS/B and for ABS with 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 wt% HGM, the reinforcement being incorporated at feeding zone (Z1) and at the extruder center (Z2).Composites obtained at Z1 (ABS2.5/Z1/S038, ABS5.0/Z1/S038, and ABS7.5/Z1/S038) and Z2 (ABS5.0/Z2/S038 and ABS7.5/Z2/S038) had superior storage modulus (G
′) values when compared with ABS/B. Storage modulus represents the amount of energy stored by a material during strain imposed by frequency at a certain temperature, indicating that the polymer relaxations can be hindered by the applied reinforcement and by the homogeneous distribution thereof in the matrix with consequent stiffness increase, while the ABS/B composite has no restrictions to molecular mobility, since it does not bear any kind of reinforcement.A further aspect to be considered for the increasedG
′ values was reported by Li et al. [16] on poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) and HGM, the homogeneous distribution of the reinforcement throughout the PBS matrix and the formation of a kind of network, the two factors being responsible for the augmented G
′ value.In Figure3 it is possible to observe that the slope of the G
′ curves for ABS/B and for the HGM composites did not alter with frequency increase at a certain temperature, this behavior having also been observed in a study by Jiang et al. [17], with ABS reinforced with calcium carbonate nanoparticles, indicating that the addition of filler did not alter neither the microstructures nor the rheological nature of ABS.Complex viscosity for ABS/B and the composites is seen in Figure4.Figure 4
Complex viscosity (η
∗) versus angular frequency for ABS/B and for ABS with 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 wt% HGM with the reinforcement incorporated at feeding zone (Z1) and at extrusion center (Z2).Complex viscosity values for Z1 composites (ABS2.5/Z1/S038 and ABS7.5/Z1/S038) were higher than those for ABS/B. At Z2, the value for the ABS5.0/Z2/S038 composite was higher than that for ABS/B. Values for the other composites were similar to those of ABS/B. According to studies by Santos et al. [8] with polyamide (PA) and organophilic montmorillonite clay, the rise in complex viscosity was attributed to flow and movement restriction of polymer chains caused by reinforcement. Complex viscosity results corroborate G
′ results, since Z1 provided higher viscosity values when compared with Z2. This results from the fact that homogenous HGM distribution in the polymer matrix is more accentuated at this feeding zone.


## 3.4. Mechanical Properties

Tensile strength and tensile modulus according to HGM loading into the composite formulations are shown in Figure5.Figure 5
Tensile strength and tensile modulus of elasticity for ABS/B and for ABS with 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 wt% HGM, the reinforcement being incorporated at the (Z1) feeding zone and at the (Z2) extruder center with statistical analysis.Reduced values for tensile strength by HGM incorporation were observed, with consequent increase in modulus of elasticity. Higher tensile strength values were observed for the composites processed at Z1 relative to Z2, which has been confirmed by statistical analysis (Figure5), in which the HGM incorporation zone significantly influenced the results obtained.Lower tensile strength values at Z2 were attributed to nonhomogeneous reinforcement distribution in the matrix, with formation of HGM agglomerates. Li et al. [16], in their studies of PBS with HGM, also attributed the diminished tensile strength to formation of reinforcement agglomeration regions.Results for composite tensile modulus (Figure5) were higher; when compared to the ABS/B control sample the best results are obtained for the ABS7.5/Z1/S038 and ABS7.5/Z2/S038 composites. The Z1 feeding zone provided the best modulus values as a function of better reinforcement distribution in the matrix, which cooperates for increased composite stiffness, as already observed by SEM micrographs and storage modulus (G
′); however this feeding zone contributes to fracturing HGMs which results in increased composite density.Figure6 shows the results obtained for flexural strength and flexural modulus.Figure 6
Flexural strength and flexural modulus of elasticity for ABS/B and for ABS with 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 wt% HGM, the reinforcement being incorporated at the (Z1) feeding zone and at the extruder center (Z2), with statistical analysis.The flexural strength is associated with the action imparted by reinforcement to the polymer matrix, and microsphere agglomerates can provide different information on flexural strength, as well as the absence of these agglomerates at certain locations of the matrix. Yalcin et al. [9] by adding 18.5% of hollow glass microspheres and wood flour to a HDPE composite observed a 21% reduction in flexural strength; this results from the fact that reinforcement reduces the flexibility of the polymer matrix and that wood flour is a filling filler.Flexural strength results did not show any relevant differences relative to the different zones of HGM incorporation, since at both zones the value for this property was reduced. The flexural modulus increased with HGM incorporation; this increase may be attributed to stiffness imparted by the reinforcement to the matrix [18, 19] as can also be seen for tensile modulus. With the increasing of HGM loading the flexural strength decreases, and this difference is significant, as can be seen from the statistical analysis presented in Figure 6.Figure7 shows impact resistance versus the HGM percentage incorporated into the composites.Figure 7
Impact resistance for ABS/B and for ABS with 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 wt% HGM, the reinforcement being incorporated at the (Z1) feeding zone and at the extruder center (Z2), with statistical analysis.As related to the different HGM feeding zones, reduced values were observed for the impact strength at Z1, with 37% reduction for Z1, while at Z2 the reduction was 30%, both being relative to results for ABS/B. This behavior was also evidenced for results observed forG
′, in which Z1 had superior stiffness values. According to statistical analysis (Figure 7) the HGM incorporation zone was the critical variable for impact resistance reduction. Impact resistance was reduced for all the composites relative to values observed for ABS/B, since according to a study by Basurto et al. [20] with ABS and glass fiber, impact resistance reduction and modulus of elasticity rise occur as a result of increased composite stiffness. A further factor for reducing impact resistance can be attributed to ABS shear during extrusion, promoting degradation of the elastomeric phase, butadiene, which is susceptible to thermomechanical degradation and also responsible for the ABS impact strength [15–17].


## 4. Conclusions

In this study, HGM-reinforced ABS polymer composites were prepared in a twin-screw extruder using two distinct feeding zones and different HGM loadings. The properties evaluated revealed that HGM plays an important role for composite reinforcement improving the stiffness and thermal stability of ABS. The results showed that HGM incorporation into ABS promotes density reduction, increased thermal stability and also increased stiffness as tested by results of storage modulus and tensile and flexural modulus of elasticity, increase in complex viscosity, and maintenance of tensile and flexural strength, with impact resistance diminished relative to ABS. The mechanical properties evaluated reached a maximum at 5 wt% of HGMs. Upon considering the most important properties for composites applications (impact strength, HDT, density, tensile, and flexural strength), it is observed that feeding zone Z2 showed the best results, probably because the integrity of the hollow glass microspheres was maintained, while Z1 zone showed better homogeneous reinforcement distribution as compared with Z2, but causing the break of HGM microspheres. This study shows that the properties of HGM-filled ABS matrix composites can be effectively controlled by adjusting the feeding zone and HGM content to develop light composites with higher mechanical performance that are potentially useful in the automotive industry.



---

*Source: 9063874-2016-07-10.xml*