# Antibacterial Activity of Green Synthesis of Iron Nanoparticles UsingLawsonia inermis and Gardenia jasminoides Leaves Extract

Authors: Tayyaba Naseem; Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

Recently, development of reliable experimental protocols for synthesis of metal nanoparticles with desired morphologies and sizes has become a major focus of researchers. Green synthesis of metallic nanoparticles has accumulated an ultimate interest over the last decade due to their distinctive properties that make them applicable in various fields of science and technology. Metal nanoparticles that are synthesized by using plants have emerged as nontoxic and ecofriendly. In this study a very cheap and simple conventional heating method was used to obtain the iron nanoparticles (FeNPs) using the leaves extract ofLawsonia inermis and Gardenia jasminoides plant. The iron nanoparticles were characterized by thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The antibacterial activity was studied against Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, Proteus mirabilis, and Staphylococcus aureus by using well-diffusion method.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Nanoparticles are considered as important structural masses of nanotechnology. The unique and most important property of the nanoparticles is that they unveil superior activity. There are remarkable applications of metal nanoparticles in the areas of diagnostic biological probes, catalysis, display devices, and optoelectronics [1]. The widespread practical application of metal nanoparticles (<100 nm) is attributable to a number of their unique properties [2–5]. Metal nanoparticles are widely synthesized using physical and chemical processes, which allow one to acquire particles with the preferred characteristics [6–8]. Several methods like hydrothermal [9], conventional heating [10], anodization [11], deposition precipitation [12], wet oxidation [13], electrodeposition [14], and sonication [15] are being applied to synthesize the nanoparticles. However, these production methods are usually expensive and labor-intensive and are potentially hazardous to the environment and living organisms.Green synthesis has advances over chemical and physical method as it is cost operative, atmosphere friendly, and easily scrabbled up for large scale synthesis and in this method there is no need to use high energy, temperature, and toxic chemicals. Green synthesis offer better influence, control over crystal growth and their steadiness. Green synthesized nanoparticles are cheap and economical and have many applications in science [16–19].From the dawn of civilization, human beings have used various medicinal plants to fight diseases [20].Lawsonia inermis is a dwarf shrub, commonly known as “Mehndi or Henna” in Pakistan. It is renowned worldwide due to its cosmetic use for the reason of exclusive active principles in the leaves. It contains different variety of molecules which are bioactive. It is believed to decrease body temperature in situation of high fever and give beautiful and healthy hair.Lawsonia inermis is grown in various dry tropical and subtropical areas of North Africa, South Asia, South East Asia, and the Middle East [21]. Strong antimicrobial, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antiparasitic, and virucidal properties of this plant have been reported [22].Lawsonia inermis leaves were studied for their antimicrobial prospective and they exhibited notable antibacterial activity against Gram-negative bacterial strains [23].Gardenia jasminoidesEllis is a flowering plant, which has its place in genusGardenia and family Rubiaceae. Traditionally, in many Asian countries it has been used as a folk medicine [24]. This plant has numerous medicinal uses for treating hemorrhage, jaundice, toothaches, hepatitis, sprains, wounds, and skin conditions [25–27]. As a hemostatic agent,Gardenia is very active as well in handling injuries of the joints, tendons, and muscles. “Crocetin” is an extracted chemical compound from theGardenia berry, from which a yellow-silk dye has been made for this treatment [28].In nanometer size metallic nanoparticles, iron has received special attention because of its physical and chemical properties which are determined by its size, shape, composition, crystallinity, and structure [29]. Bimetallic iron and silver containing nanoparticles (Fe-Ag NPs) have numerous applications in optical, medical, and remediation fields [30]. Iron nanoparticles can also be used as oxidant for the synthesis of multiwalled carbon nanotubes- (MWCNTs-) core/thiophene polymer-sheath composite nanocables in the presence of cationic surfactant, decyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (DTAB) [31]. Against the bacterial strains causing digestive problems, iron nanoparticles of corn flakes-like morphology gave excellent antibacterial activity [32].Bacterial resistance to various antibiotics is a serious clinical dilemma, so different antimicrobial activities were performed using plants as a source. The development in the field of green chemistry has delivered different nanomaterials as substitute antibacterial agents. In this present study, an effort is made to synthesize iron nanoparticles using leaves extract ofLawsonia inermis andGardenia jasminoidesas reducing agent. The characterization of green synthesized iron nanoparticles was characterized by thermal gravimetric (TGA), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Also antibacterial activity was studied against human pathogenic Gram-negative (Escherichia coli,Salmonella enterica, andProteus mirabilis) and Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) bacterial strains.


## 2. Materials and Methods

Fresh leaves of Henna andGardenia plants were collected from various botanical gardens of Lahore, Pakistan. Sulfuric acid (conc.) and iron sulphate (FeSO4) were purchased from Merck and all chemicals were used short of any further purification. CORNING (PC-420D) hot plate was used to maintain the temperature in the synthesis process. Various techniques were used to characterize the synthesized samples, that is, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) on MIDAC M2000 which identified various functional groups present in extract and which determined the presence of metal, powder X-ray diffractometer (XRD) of X’pert PRO, and PANalytical, equipped with a copper anode source generating X-rays having wavelength equal to 1.54 Å. The elemental composition and morphology were investigated by using scanning electron microscope-energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) on Hitachi S3400 on an accelerating voltage of 15.0 kV. The size of synthesized sample particles was determined by transmission electron microscope (TEM) of Phillip CM12 microscope.


### 2.1. Preparation of Powder

Fresh leaves of Henna andGardeniaplants were softly eroded in deionized water by which the dust particles were removed and plants material was then placed to dry under sunlight for seven days. All of the dried leaves of plants were ground using grinder, pastel, and mortar. After the process of grinding the leaves powder went through sieving to get very fine particles of uniform size. Nanoparticles were synthesized by using sieved powder.


### 2.2. Preparation of FeNPs

A simple conventional heating method was used in the synthesis of iron nanoparticles (FeNPs) by using plant extract. Plant extract was prepared by dissolving 2 gm of the sieved powder in 50 mL of deionized water and the resulting mixture kept on stirring for 3 hours by using the magnetic stirrer. The resulting solution was placed to stable for 1 hour and then filtered. 10 mL of 0.01 M FeSO4 solution was used in which plant extract (filtrate) was added after every interval of 5 minutes using 2 mL in each interval until 50 mL; resulting mixture was stirred at 70°C. The difference of temperature was noted after every interval of 5 minutes. The solution was placed to cool down and the product was parted by centrifugation (10,000 rpm) for 2 minutes. The product was dried at 50°C for 3 hours. The plant extract (filtrate) acts as reducing, capping, and stabilizing agent in iron nanoparticles synthesis [33].


### 2.3. Antibacterial Studies

Three human pathogenic Gram-negative (Escherichia coli,Salmonella enterica, andProteus mirabilis) and one Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) bacterial strains were used for antimicrobial study of iron nanoparticles by well-diffusion method [34–36]. The bacterial strains were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) at 37°C with continuous shaking at 200 rpm for 24 hours. 100 μL from each bacterial culture was spread on LB agar plates with the help of L-shaped glass spreader. Three wells were developed in each plate with the help of sterilized steel borer of 8 mm diameter and 30 μL sample suspension was loaded in each well. The plates were incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. Diameter of the inhibition zones was recorded in mm. The experiment was repeated thrice and the average values were calculated for antibacterial activity.


## 2.1. Preparation of Powder

Fresh leaves of Henna andGardeniaplants were softly eroded in deionized water by which the dust particles were removed and plants material was then placed to dry under sunlight for seven days. All of the dried leaves of plants were ground using grinder, pastel, and mortar. After the process of grinding the leaves powder went through sieving to get very fine particles of uniform size. Nanoparticles were synthesized by using sieved powder.


## 2.2. Preparation of FeNPs

A simple conventional heating method was used in the synthesis of iron nanoparticles (FeNPs) by using plant extract. Plant extract was prepared by dissolving 2 gm of the sieved powder in 50 mL of deionized water and the resulting mixture kept on stirring for 3 hours by using the magnetic stirrer. The resulting solution was placed to stable for 1 hour and then filtered. 10 mL of 0.01 M FeSO4 solution was used in which plant extract (filtrate) was added after every interval of 5 minutes using 2 mL in each interval until 50 mL; resulting mixture was stirred at 70°C. The difference of temperature was noted after every interval of 5 minutes. The solution was placed to cool down and the product was parted by centrifugation (10,000 rpm) for 2 minutes. The product was dried at 50°C for 3 hours. The plant extract (filtrate) acts as reducing, capping, and stabilizing agent in iron nanoparticles synthesis [33].


## 2.3. Antibacterial Studies

Three human pathogenic Gram-negative (Escherichia coli,Salmonella enterica, andProteus mirabilis) and one Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) bacterial strains were used for antimicrobial study of iron nanoparticles by well-diffusion method [34–36]. The bacterial strains were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) at 37°C with continuous shaking at 200 rpm for 24 hours. 100 μL from each bacterial culture was spread on LB agar plates with the help of L-shaped glass spreader. Three wells were developed in each plate with the help of sterilized steel borer of 8 mm diameter and 30 μL sample suspension was loaded in each well. The plates were incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. Diameter of the inhibition zones was recorded in mm. The experiment was repeated thrice and the average values were calculated for antibacterial activity.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. TGA of FeNPs Synthesized Using Henna andGardenia Leave Extract

The weight losses were 12% at 60–205°C and 31% at 280–510°C which were due to the removal of moisture, hydrogen, and three oxygen molecules present in coumaric acid (chemical constituent in Henna), respectively, as shown in Figure1.Figure 1
TGA of FeNPs synthesized using Henna leaves extract.Figure2 represents the TGA for the FeNPs synthesized usingGardeniaplant extract. Initial weight was lost at 7% at 90–205°C because of removal of moisture, two hydrogen molecules present in catechin (chemical constituent ofGardenia). Second weight loss was 22% at 340–690°C and represents the removal of two oxygen molecules present in ferric sulphate used.Figure 2
TGA of FeNPs synthesized usingGardenia plant extract.


### 3.2. FTIR Analysis of FeNPs Synthesized Using Henna andGardenia Leaves Extract

The main constituent of Henna extract is Lawson (2-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone). It contains benzene unit, p-benzoquinone unit, and phenolic group. The Henna extract was evaporated to dryness to get a solid mass. Its FTIR spectrum is shown in Figure3 [37].Figure 3
FTIR spectra of FeNPs synthesized using Henna leaves extract.The phenolic O–H stretch appeared at 3302.38–3264.84 cm−1. The aromatic C=C stretching frequency which appeared at 1539.81 cm−1 is due to p-coumaric acid present in the sample. The C=O stretching frequency appeared at 1622.64 cm−1. Thus Lawson was characterized by IR spectroscopy. It was inferred that Lawson has coordinated with Fe0 through the phenolic oxygen, aromatic ring, and C=O group of the p-benzoquinone resulting in the formation of Fe0 which have Lawson as capping and stabilizing agent on the anodic sites of the metal surface. The band at 612.63 cm−1 was due to Fe as shown in Figure 3. Thus FTIR spectral study leads to the conclusion that the fingermark film consists of Fe0 Lawson complex [38].The FTIR spectra of Fe nanoparticles synthesized withGardenia leave extract are given in Figure 4. The broad absorption band in the region from 3400 to 3200 cm−1 represents –OH group stretching and another peak at 2700 cm−1 represents C–H stretching. The bands at 1647.28 and 1521.71 cm−1 may be assigned, respectively, to a C=O stretching vibration band (C=O) and a coupled vibration involving the bending and the C–N stretching modes of the amido bond of the biomass. The peak at 1032.47 cm−1 is corresponding to the vibrations of C–O in C–CCOOR. The band at 612.63 cm−1 was due to Fe vibrations.Figure 4
FTIR spectra of FeNPs synthesized usingGardenia leaves extract.


### 3.3. XRD Analysis of FeNPs Synthesized Using Henna andGardenia Leaves Extract

The nature and phase composition of FeNPs were identified by X-ray powder diffractometer with Bragg’s angle ranging from 10° to 70°. The presence of Fe in nanopowder was confirmed by a series of reflection angles (2θ) at 44.34° and 64.43° having hkl values (111), (200), and (202) [39], respectively, with cubic plane of Fe [40] as shown in Figure 5.Figure 5
XRD pattern of FeNPs synthesized using Henna leaves extract.The presence of Fe in nanopowder synthesized byGardenia leave extract was confirmed by a series of reflection angles (2θ) at 44.34° and 64.43° having hkl values (111), (200) and (202) [39], respectively, with cubic plane of Fe [40] as shown in Figure 6.Figure 6
XRD pattern of FeNPs synthesized usingGardenia leaves extract.


### 3.4. TEM Image of FeNPs Using Henna andGardenia Leaves Extract

TEM analysis of the FeNPs was performed which were formed by using the Henna leaves extract and FeSO4 salt solution. The size of iron nanoparticles synthesized using Henna leaves extract was calculated as 21 nm as shown in Figure 7. While particle size of the same was observed as 32 nm when synthesized using theGardenia leaves extract as shown in Figure 8.Figure 7
TEM analysis of FeNPs synthesized using Henna leaves extract.Figure 8
TEM image of FeNPs synthesized usingGardenia leaves extract.


### 3.5. SEM-EDX Analysis of FeNPs Synthesized Using Henna andGardenia Leaves Extract

FeNPs synthesized using extract of leaves of Henna plant are studied under SEM. It indicates that nanoparticles formed are agglomerated because of the adhesive nature having morphology of distorted hexagonal-like appearance as shown in Figure9(a).(a) SEM image and (b) EDX graph of FeNPs synthesized using Henna leaves extract.
(a)
(b)Elemental composition of FeNPs synthesized using Henna leaves extract was determined by using EDX analysis. It was observed that the percentage of iron is 6.86%, carbon is 54.59%, oxygen is 36.57%, magnesium and phosphorus are 0.68%, and potassium is 0.63% as shown in Figure9(b). Mg and carbon are due to plant constituents.FeNPs synthesized using extract of leaves ofGardenia plant are studied under SEM and shown in Figure 10(a). It indicates that nanoparticles formed are agglomerated because of the adhesive nature having morphology of shattered rock-like appearance.(a) SEM image and (b) EDX graph of FeNPs synthesized usingGardenia leaves extract.
(a)
(b)Elemental composition of FeNPs synthesized usingGardenia leaves extract was also determined by using EDX analysis.Elemental composition was found as percentage of iron is 4.68%, carbon is 50.79%, oxygen is 41.37%, aluminium is 0.76%, silicon is 1.57%, and potassium is 0.83% as shown in Figure10(b).


#### 3.5.1. Antibacterial Results

Iron nanoparticles were synthesized using five different plants, that is,Lawsonia inermis,Gardenia jasminoides,Azadirachta indica, andCamellia sinensisleaves extract andCinnamon zeylanicum barks extract and it was found that all are susceptible to all bacterial strains. Here we are representing the results of mainly the two of them, that is, iron nanoparticles synthesized usingLawsonia inermis andGardenia jasminoides (Table 1) and the comparison is given in Figure 11. FeNPs ofGardenia jasminoides were more potent againstStaphylococcus aureus with zone of inhibition (ZOI) 16 mm, whereas forLawsonia inermis it was 15 mm as shown in Figure 12. AgainstEscherichia coli,Salmonella enterica, andProteus mirabilis the ZOI of iron nanoparticles ofLawsonia inermis andGardenia jasminoidesleaves extract was 14 mm and 15 mm, 9 mm and 12 mm, 11 mm and 13 mm, respectively.Table 1
Antibacterial activity of iron nanoparticles ofLawsonia inermis and Gardenia jasminoidesleaves extract (30 μL/mL).
Microorganisms
Leaves extract
Lawsonia inermis
Gardenia jasminoides
Zone of inhibition (mm)
Bacterial strains
E. coli (−)
14
15
S. enterica (−)
09
12
P. mirabilis (−)
11
13
S. aureus (+)
15
16Figure 11
Comparison of antibacterial activity of iron nanoparticles ofLawsonia inermis andGardenia jasminoidesleaves extract against bacterial strains.(a) Zone inhibition of FeNPs against P4 =Escherichia coli, P5 =Salmonella enterica, B =Lawsonia inermis, and D =Gardenia jasminoides. (b) Zone inhibition of FeNPs against P4 =Staphylococcus aureus, P5 =Proteus mirabilis, B =Lawsonia inermis, and D =Gardenia jasminoides.
(a)
(b)


## 3.1. TGA of FeNPs Synthesized Using Henna andGardenia Leave Extract

The weight losses were 12% at 60–205°C and 31% at 280–510°C which were due to the removal of moisture, hydrogen, and three oxygen molecules present in coumaric acid (chemical constituent in Henna), respectively, as shown in Figure1.Figure 1
TGA of FeNPs synthesized using Henna leaves extract.Figure2 represents the TGA for the FeNPs synthesized usingGardeniaplant extract. Initial weight was lost at 7% at 90–205°C because of removal of moisture, two hydrogen molecules present in catechin (chemical constituent ofGardenia). Second weight loss was 22% at 340–690°C and represents the removal of two oxygen molecules present in ferric sulphate used.Figure 2
TGA of FeNPs synthesized usingGardenia plant extract.


## 3.2. FTIR Analysis of FeNPs Synthesized Using Henna andGardenia Leaves Extract

The main constituent of Henna extract is Lawson (2-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone). It contains benzene unit, p-benzoquinone unit, and phenolic group. The Henna extract was evaporated to dryness to get a solid mass. Its FTIR spectrum is shown in Figure3 [37].Figure 3
FTIR spectra of FeNPs synthesized using Henna leaves extract.The phenolic O–H stretch appeared at 3302.38–3264.84 cm−1. The aromatic C=C stretching frequency which appeared at 1539.81 cm−1 is due to p-coumaric acid present in the sample. The C=O stretching frequency appeared at 1622.64 cm−1. Thus Lawson was characterized by IR spectroscopy. It was inferred that Lawson has coordinated with Fe0 through the phenolic oxygen, aromatic ring, and C=O group of the p-benzoquinone resulting in the formation of Fe0 which have Lawson as capping and stabilizing agent on the anodic sites of the metal surface. The band at 612.63 cm−1 was due to Fe as shown in Figure 3. Thus FTIR spectral study leads to the conclusion that the fingermark film consists of Fe0 Lawson complex [38].The FTIR spectra of Fe nanoparticles synthesized withGardenia leave extract are given in Figure 4. The broad absorption band in the region from 3400 to 3200 cm−1 represents –OH group stretching and another peak at 2700 cm−1 represents C–H stretching. The bands at 1647.28 and 1521.71 cm−1 may be assigned, respectively, to a C=O stretching vibration band (C=O) and a coupled vibration involving the bending and the C–N stretching modes of the amido bond of the biomass. The peak at 1032.47 cm−1 is corresponding to the vibrations of C–O in C–CCOOR. The band at 612.63 cm−1 was due to Fe vibrations.Figure 4
FTIR spectra of FeNPs synthesized usingGardenia leaves extract.


## 3.3. XRD Analysis of FeNPs Synthesized Using Henna andGardenia Leaves Extract

The nature and phase composition of FeNPs were identified by X-ray powder diffractometer with Bragg’s angle ranging from 10° to 70°. The presence of Fe in nanopowder was confirmed by a series of reflection angles (2θ) at 44.34° and 64.43° having hkl values (111), (200), and (202) [39], respectively, with cubic plane of Fe [40] as shown in Figure 5.Figure 5
XRD pattern of FeNPs synthesized using Henna leaves extract.The presence of Fe in nanopowder synthesized byGardenia leave extract was confirmed by a series of reflection angles (2θ) at 44.34° and 64.43° having hkl values (111), (200) and (202) [39], respectively, with cubic plane of Fe [40] as shown in Figure 6.Figure 6
XRD pattern of FeNPs synthesized usingGardenia leaves extract.


## 3.4. TEM Image of FeNPs Using Henna andGardenia Leaves Extract

TEM analysis of the FeNPs was performed which were formed by using the Henna leaves extract and FeSO4 salt solution. The size of iron nanoparticles synthesized using Henna leaves extract was calculated as 21 nm as shown in Figure 7. While particle size of the same was observed as 32 nm when synthesized using theGardenia leaves extract as shown in Figure 8.Figure 7
TEM analysis of FeNPs synthesized using Henna leaves extract.Figure 8
TEM image of FeNPs synthesized usingGardenia leaves extract.


## 3.5. SEM-EDX Analysis of FeNPs Synthesized Using Henna andGardenia Leaves Extract

FeNPs synthesized using extract of leaves of Henna plant are studied under SEM. It indicates that nanoparticles formed are agglomerated because of the adhesive nature having morphology of distorted hexagonal-like appearance as shown in Figure9(a).(a) SEM image and (b) EDX graph of FeNPs synthesized using Henna leaves extract.
(a)
(b)Elemental composition of FeNPs synthesized using Henna leaves extract was determined by using EDX analysis. It was observed that the percentage of iron is 6.86%, carbon is 54.59%, oxygen is 36.57%, magnesium and phosphorus are 0.68%, and potassium is 0.63% as shown in Figure9(b). Mg and carbon are due to plant constituents.FeNPs synthesized using extract of leaves ofGardenia plant are studied under SEM and shown in Figure 10(a). It indicates that nanoparticles formed are agglomerated because of the adhesive nature having morphology of shattered rock-like appearance.(a) SEM image and (b) EDX graph of FeNPs synthesized usingGardenia leaves extract.
(a)
(b)Elemental composition of FeNPs synthesized usingGardenia leaves extract was also determined by using EDX analysis.Elemental composition was found as percentage of iron is 4.68%, carbon is 50.79%, oxygen is 41.37%, aluminium is 0.76%, silicon is 1.57%, and potassium is 0.83% as shown in Figure10(b).


### 3.5.1. Antibacterial Results

Iron nanoparticles were synthesized using five different plants, that is,Lawsonia inermis,Gardenia jasminoides,Azadirachta indica, andCamellia sinensisleaves extract andCinnamon zeylanicum barks extract and it was found that all are susceptible to all bacterial strains. Here we are representing the results of mainly the two of them, that is, iron nanoparticles synthesized usingLawsonia inermis andGardenia jasminoides (Table 1) and the comparison is given in Figure 11. FeNPs ofGardenia jasminoides were more potent againstStaphylococcus aureus with zone of inhibition (ZOI) 16 mm, whereas forLawsonia inermis it was 15 mm as shown in Figure 12. AgainstEscherichia coli,Salmonella enterica, andProteus mirabilis the ZOI of iron nanoparticles ofLawsonia inermis andGardenia jasminoidesleaves extract was 14 mm and 15 mm, 9 mm and 12 mm, 11 mm and 13 mm, respectively.Table 1
Antibacterial activity of iron nanoparticles ofLawsonia inermis and Gardenia jasminoidesleaves extract (30 μL/mL).
Microorganisms
Leaves extract
Lawsonia inermis
Gardenia jasminoides
Zone of inhibition (mm)
Bacterial strains
E. coli (−)
14
15
S. enterica (−)
09
12
P. mirabilis (−)
11
13
S. aureus (+)
15
16Figure 11
Comparison of antibacterial activity of iron nanoparticles ofLawsonia inermis andGardenia jasminoidesleaves extract against bacterial strains.(a) Zone inhibition of FeNPs against P4 =Escherichia coli, P5 =Salmonella enterica, B =Lawsonia inermis, and D =Gardenia jasminoides. (b) Zone inhibition of FeNPs against P4 =Staphylococcus aureus, P5 =Proteus mirabilis, B =Lawsonia inermis, and D =Gardenia jasminoides.
(a)
(b)


## 3.5.1. Antibacterial Results

Iron nanoparticles were synthesized using five different plants, that is,Lawsonia inermis,Gardenia jasminoides,Azadirachta indica, andCamellia sinensisleaves extract andCinnamon zeylanicum barks extract and it was found that all are susceptible to all bacterial strains. Here we are representing the results of mainly the two of them, that is, iron nanoparticles synthesized usingLawsonia inermis andGardenia jasminoides (Table 1) and the comparison is given in Figure 11. FeNPs ofGardenia jasminoides were more potent againstStaphylococcus aureus with zone of inhibition (ZOI) 16 mm, whereas forLawsonia inermis it was 15 mm as shown in Figure 12. AgainstEscherichia coli,Salmonella enterica, andProteus mirabilis the ZOI of iron nanoparticles ofLawsonia inermis andGardenia jasminoidesleaves extract was 14 mm and 15 mm, 9 mm and 12 mm, 11 mm and 13 mm, respectively.Table 1
Antibacterial activity of iron nanoparticles ofLawsonia inermis and Gardenia jasminoidesleaves extract (30 μL/mL).
Microorganisms
Leaves extract
Lawsonia inermis
Gardenia jasminoides
Zone of inhibition (mm)
Bacterial strains
E. coli (−)
14
15
S. enterica (−)
09
12
P. mirabilis (−)
11
13
S. aureus (+)
15
16Figure 11
Comparison of antibacterial activity of iron nanoparticles ofLawsonia inermis andGardenia jasminoidesleaves extract against bacterial strains.(a) Zone inhibition of FeNPs against P4 =Escherichia coli, P5 =Salmonella enterica, B =Lawsonia inermis, and D =Gardenia jasminoides. (b) Zone inhibition of FeNPs against P4 =Staphylococcus aureus, P5 =Proteus mirabilis, B =Lawsonia inermis, and D =Gardenia jasminoides.
(a)
(b)


## 4. Conclusion

Due to the rich biodiversity of plants, the green world has potential for the synthesis of noble metal nanoparticles. Iron nanoparticles with an average size of 21 nm and 32 nm were synthesized usingLawsonia inermis andGardenia jasminoidesleaves extract, respectively. Green synthesized iron nanoparticles in the present study show good antibacterial activity against the human pathogensEscherichia coli andStaphylococcus aureus. AsLawsonia inermis andGardenia jasminoides have been used in folk medicines, these green iron nanoparticles ofLawsonia inermis andGardenia jasminoides have potential biomedical activities and have several paybacks such as suitability for medical and pharmaceutical submissions.



---

*Source: 912342-2015-01-21.xml*