# Efficiency Investigations of Organic/Inorganic Hybrid ZnO Nanoparticles Based Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

Authors: Satbir Singh; Amarpal Singh; Navneet Kaur
Journal: Journal of Materials
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

The present research study focuses upon the synthesis, characterization, and performances of optoelectronic properties of organic-inorganic (hybrid) ZnO based dye sensitized solar cells. Initially, polymer dyeA was synthesized using condensation reaction between 2-thiophenecarboxaldehyde and polyethylenimine and was capped to ZnO nanoparticles. Size and morphology of polymer dyeA capped ZnO nanoparticles were analyzed using DLS, SEM, and XRD analysis. Further, the polymer dye was added to ruthenium metal complex (RuCl3) to form polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB. Absorption and emission profiles of polymer dyeA and polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB capped ZnO nanoparticles were monitored using UV-Vis and fluorescence spectroscopy. Polymer dyeA and polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB capped ZnO nanoparticles were further processed to solar cells using wet precipitation method under room temperature. The results of investigations revealed that, after addition of ruthenium chloride (RuCl3) metal complex dye, the light harvesting capacity of ZnO solar cell was enhanced compared to polymer dyeA capped ZnO based solar cell. The polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB capped ZnO solar cell exhibited good photovoltaic performance with excellent cell parameters, that is, exciting open circuit voltage (V
o
c) of 0.70 V, a short circuit current density (J
s
c) of 11.6 mA/cm2, and a fill factor (FF) of 0.65. A maximum photovoltaic cell efficiency of 5.28% had been recorded under standard air mass (AM 1.5) simulated solar illuminations for polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB based hybrid ZnO solar cell. The power conversion efficiency of hybrid ZnO based dye sensitized solar cell was enhanced by 1.78% and 3.88% compared to polymer dyeA (concentrated) and polymer dyeA (diluted) capped ZnO based dye sensitized solar cells, respectively. The hybrid organic/inorganic ZnO nanostructures can be implemented in a variety of optoelectronic applications in the future of clean and green technology.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Currently, different types of photovoltaic materials, for example, organic dyes, inorganic semiconductor nanoparticles, conducting polymers, and their combinations, have been prepared for utilization in optimal optoelectronic and photovoltaic applications. The combination of organic and inorganic semiconductor material fabricates the hybrid nature of the resulting material [1, 2]. The hybrid photo materials have different optoelectronic applications, for example, in solar cells, luminescent displays, and light sensors. The hybrid material based dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) are intensively recommended as a strong, efficient, and promising alternative to the conventional single crystalline silicon based solar cells. This is due to their low cost fabrication process and good photovoltaic/photophysical properties. DSSCs based on an inorganic semiconductor material are expensive and their fabrication methods are also complex [3, 4]. An inorganic semiconductor material possesses optimal electronic properties, photoluminescent features, good charge mobility, and high thermal stability. ZnO is a cheap and environment friendly inorganic material [5, 6]. An organic material exhibits promising properties such as low synthesis cost, recyclability and easy processing, and good reliability [7–10]. An organic/inorganic hybrid DSSC combines the advantageous features of conjugated or conducting polymer and wide band gap inorganic semiconductor material’s nanoparticles. The combined absorption band of hybrid material has high photons (sunlight) harvesting capacity. The conducting polymers have been combined with variety of inorganic semiconductors, for example, ZnO, TiO2, and CdSe. In the class of resulting hybrid material, there is generation of induced charge carrier’s separation at the interface of organic-inorganic material. This photo charge carrier separation is responsible for the injection of electrons from conducting polymer into inorganic semiconductor material. The polymer consists of hole vacancies and the combination of holes and electrons takes place at donor-acceptor (D-A) interface. An exciton is produced from the bound relation of electron-hole pair. The excitons absorbed in the inorganic semiconductor material produce the photogeneration of charge carriers. The light absorption profile and wide band gap nature of inorganic semiconductor material can be modified by quantum confinement effect [11–16]. By taking the advantages of this way, researchers can effectively increase the harvesting capacity of dye molecules and power conversion efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cell. For the present research work, the fabrication of DSSC is based upon an organic polymer dye, inorganic oxide semiconductor material (ZnO), and ruthenium metal complex material. During the fabrication process of DSSC, the semiconductor ZnO (wide band gap) nanoparticles were capped by a layer of polymer dye molecules on a transparent conductive film in the form of photosensitized anode. The advantages of polymer decorated ZnO nanoparticles include the nonaggregation phenomenon which modifies the surface of ZnO nanoparticles by using the process of surface passivation [17–20]. It also provides the large nanocrystalline surface area for the absorption of light photons and significant enhancement of the light harvesting capacity of photoelectrode. Hence, the overall photovoltaic efficiency of the solar cell increases [14]. In the middle section of DSSC, a liquid electrolyte was used that contained a redox couple. It connected two conductors (anode and cathode) of the cell electrically [21, 22]. At the final fabrication stage of dye-sensitized solar cell, a counter electrode was prepared and fixed upon the other side of cell. The conductive substrate coated material such as Pt, carbon, or graphite can be used as a counter electrode or cathode for the solar cell. The dye material (polymer dye or ruthenium metal complex dye) absorbs the maximum sunlight and produces photons or excitons that are split across the surface area of polymer decorated ZnO nanoparticles. This phenomenon leads to the generation of photoelectrons which are injected into conduction band of semiconductor ZnO [23–27]. Hence, at the counter electrode section, the transported electrons from polymer decorated ZnO and migrated holes from electrolyte solution recombine and generate photovoltage in the mV (millivolt) ranges. Till date, the highest power conversion efficiency reported for ZnO based DSSC is up to 7.5% [17]. In the literature reviewed, many research papers have been deeply studied and analyzed in reference to polymer and ruthenium dyes based ZnO solar cells. Singh et al. [6] demonstrated the effect of thiol derivatized Ru-based dye on ZnO based DSSC. Zhang et al. [10] synthesized and studied the ZnO aggregates in the form of nanosized crystallites on the enhanced light harvesting performance of DSSC. Liu [2] reviewed the concept of organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposites for photovoltaic cells. In case of hybrid solar cell materials, more improvements in efficiency can be expected. Kumar et al. [28] reported the efficiencies up to 1.56% and 1.84% for boron and aluminum doped ZnO based DSSCs, respectively. There are many fabrication techniques for ZnO based hybrid DSSCs including wet precipitation, thin film deposition method, spray coating, spin coating, sol-gel method, screen printing, chemical vapor deposition, and hydrothermal technique [10, 12]. The present research work focused on the optoelectronic and photovoltaic performances of hybrid ZnO material for DSSC. We have used wet precipitation method for the preparation of polymer decorated ZnO nanoparticles. These polymer decorated ZnO nanoparticles are used as an active layer on the indium tin oxide (ITO) glass substrate acting as an anode. The DSSCs performances were recorded with the addition of organic polymer dye to ZnO nanoparticles and polymer-ruthenium metal complex dye to ZnO comparatively.(1) Polymer Dye Capped ZnO DSSC. The dye-sensitized solar cell was invented by Professor Graetzel using ruthenium metal complexes for improving and enhancing the photon-to-electronic current conversion efficiency compared to solid state silicon based solar cells [29]. Till 2013, record 24.7% solar cell efficiency was achieved by HIT silicon solar cell [30]. The hybrid ZnO based DSSCs do not require complex and sophisticated fabrication method as in the case of silicon solar cells. In the modern era of engineering and nanotechnology, very transparent, flexible, and colorful DSSCs can be fabricated for different optoelectronic applications. Figure 1 shows the basic schematic of polymer dye capped ZnO based DSSC. As shown in the schematic, polymer dye molecules play a vital role of (photons) absorbers from direct sunlight or simulated light conditions (photon emission source). A high absorption spectrum of the dye molecules produces strong stream of photocurrent inside the ZnO based DSSC. The overall quantum efficiency of ZnO based DSSC improves due to optimal injection of electronic charge from ground state (S-valance band) to excited state (S
∗-conduction band) from smooth surface grafting of oxide nanoparticles. The photoanode section of DSSC absorbs dye molecules and performs the conduction of photoelectrons. ZnO is a wide band gap n-type semiconductor material broadly used as a photoanode in the solar cells. Polymer decorated ZnO nanoparticles show remarkable advantages, when utilized as a layer of photoanode in the solar cells. The liquid electrolyte is used in the ZnO based DSSC due to its good surface wetting properties. It prevents the dye molecules from dryness. The liquid electrolyte contains an iodide/tri-iodide (I
-
/
I
3
-) redox pair that transfer electronic charges throughout the electrolyte. The chemisorption process, which is initiated by dye molecules and light radiations, produces the injection of electrons from HOMO to LUMO states of energy. The redox pair process (I
-
/
I
3
-) reduces the dye ions at counter electrode (cathode) section of DSSC. So, the energy difference between the Fermi energy state and redox potential state generates the maximum voltage in mV ranges.Figure 1
Schematic of polymer dye capped ZnO based DSSC.


## 2. Experimental Technique

This section deeply focuses on the synthesis procedure and structural characteristics of polymer dyeA and polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB capped ZnO nanoparticles.


### 2.1. Materials and Measuring Instruments

For synthesis process, all the chemical materials were purchased from a commercial dealer and were used without further purification.1H NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) and 13C NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) spectra were recorded on Avance-II (Bruker) instrument, which was operated at 400 MHz for 1H NMR. The CHN (carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen) analysis was performed on PerkinElmer 2400 CHN Elemental Analyzer. For cation recognition studies, the UV-Vis absorption spectra were taken using dilute solutions in quartz cells (1 cm path length). The fluorescence profile of sensor solutions was recorded on PerkinElmer L55 Fluorescence spectrophotometer using 1 cm path length of quartz cells. Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) studies were conducted on samples obtained after drying the aqueous solutions of materials (10 μM) and SEM images were taken by JEOL JSM-6610LV scanning electron microscope which was operated at 15 KeV. The particle size of organic nanoparticles (ONPs) was determined by Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) using external probe feature of Microtrac Ultra Nanotrac Particle Size Analyzer instrument. For analyzing, 10 μM concentration of solution was used and presented results are the average of 20 scans × 240 pixels recorded with Camtasia recorder at 12 frames/s. The crystal structure of the ZnO powders was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) with a PANalytical X′PERT PRO diffractometer operated at 45 KV and 40 mA using Ni-filtered Cu Kα radiations with a scan speed of 10°/min for 2θ in a range from 10 to 75. The average crystalline size of polymer dye capped ZnO nanoparticles was calculated with Debye-Scherrer’s equation using XRD analysis data [31]. The DSSC performance was evaluated by measurement of current and voltage curves (with OMEGA DMM 101 digital multimeter) under simulated solar light source (Xenon Light Projector) with air mass (AM) 1.5 solar irradiation.


### 2.2. Synthesis of Polymer DyeA

Polymer dyeA was synthesized by reaction of 2-thiophenecarboxaldehyde (1, 1 mmol) and polyamine (2, 2.5 mmol) in dry methanol as shown in Figure 3. After the completion of reaction (TLC), solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. A pale yellow product was separated out and product was washed by methanol and polymer dye was characterized by 1H NMR and mass and IR and CHN spectroscopy. A light yellow solid was obtained in 87% yield (195 mg). mp (melting point) > 190°C; IR (KBr): ν
m
a
x 1660, 1532, 1245, 1222 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.10 (s, 4H, CH=N), 7.75–7.72 (m, 3H, ArHs), 7.66 (dd, 1H, ArH), 7.44–7.36 (m, 4H, ArHs), 7.22–7.13 (m, 4H, ArHs), 3.76 (t, 2H, CH2), 3.68 (t, 4H, CH2), 3.45–3.90 (m, 4H, CH2), 3.18 (s, 1H, NH), 3.07–2.91 (m, 4H, CH2), 2.85–2.69 (m, 6H, CH2), 2.61–2.50 (m, 6H, CH2), 2.54–2.50 (m, 4H, CH2), 2.45–2.42 (m, 4H, CH2), 2.38–2.33 (m, 4H, 2 × CH2), 1.91–1.85 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.65 (s, 1H, NH), 1.64 (s, 1H, NH), 1.63–1.55 (m, 1H, CH), 1.49–1.45 (m, 2H, CH2); MS (ESI): m
/
z 859 (M + Na+); Anal. calcd. For C42H62N10S4: C, 60.25; H, 7.70; N, 16.73 Found: C, 60.16; H, 7.59; N, 16.66%.


### 2.3. Preparation of Polymer DyeA Capped ZnO Nanoparticles

Initially, the solution of ZnO was synthesized by mixing the alcoholic solution of Zn(NO3)2·6H2O (595 mg, 2.0 mmol) with alcoholic solution of NaOH (120 mg, 3.0 mmol). A white product was separated out and the product was washed by ethanol. The product was dried at 150°C. Polymer dyeA was taken along with ZnO (100 mg) in dry CHCl3 and the solution was refluxed for 6 hours. The progress of dye coating was monitored by IR and UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy by taking a small sample from the reaction mixture at different intervals. Upon completion of reaction, light yellow colored solid polymer dyeA capped ZnO nanoparticles were separated out. Polymer dyeA capped ZnO nanoparticles were further washed with excess of methanol and dried under vacuum. Polymer dyeA capped ZnO nanoparticles were characterized using DLS, SEM, and solid state XRD [28].


### 2.4. Formation of Polymer-Ruthenium Metal Complex as Composite DyeB

The polymer compounds (604 mg, 3 mmol) were taken along with RuCl3 trihydrate complex (100 mg) in dry MeOH and the solution was refluxed for 10 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored by IR and UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy by taking a small sample from the reaction mixture. Upon completion of reaction, solution was concentrated, cooled, and stirred with petroleum ether. The resultant solid was washed by dichloromethane and dried in vacuum over anhydrous calcium chloride. Polymer Schiff base showed strong absorption band in the region of 1630–1660 cm−1. However, upon complexion with the metal it shifted to lower frequency indicating formation of the metal complex with CH=N. Hence, polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB was prepared and was used as a good light harvester in ZnO solar cell.


### 2.5. Fabrication of ZnO Based DSSC

For the fabrication of ZnO based DSSCs, we have prepared two different dyes: polymer dyeA and polymer-ruthenium metal complex dyeB, respectively. Both of the dyes were separately pasted on a cleaned and dried ITO conductive glass sheet, which acted as a photoanode. Further, polymer dyeA was prepared into a diluted form and processed for fabrication of ZnO based DSSC. The polymer dye capped thin sheet of ZnO nanoparticles was air-dried at room temperature (25°C). The surface area of this sheet was selected as 1.0 cm2. The conductive side of carbon dust (obtained from candle flame) coated counter electrode was placed on top of the anode sheet. A liquid electrolyte (iodide/tri-iodide) based solution was placed at the top of the conductive edge of cell. This liquid electrolyte was put into the space between the two conductive electrodes with capillary action. Thereafter, two good black binder clips were used to hold the electrodes together. The effective cell surface area was 1.0 cm2 as shown in Figure 2. The polymer dye capped ZnO nanoparticles layer was fixed on ITO conductive glass (as shown in Figures 2(A) and 2(B)). A counter electrode in the form of carbon dust flamed with a candle on another conductive ITO glass has been shown in Figure 2(C). Finally, the circuit assembly of ZnO based DSSC was ready for measuring different parameters, that is, short circuit current density (J
sc), open circuit voltage (V
oc), fill factor, and incident photoelectric conversion efficiency represented in Figure 2(D).Figure 2
Assembly sections of polymer decorated ZnO based DSSC. ((A) and (B)) Polymer dye capped ZnO nanoparticles in the form of a paste on ITO conductive sheet acting as a photoanode having a surface area 1 cm × 1 cm, (C) counter electrode acting as a cathode for DSSC made from candle dust, and (D) circuit diagram of DSSC for measuring current density and open circuit voltage for DSSC.Figure 3
Chemical structure of polymer dyeA.For measuring photovoltaic characteristics, that is, current density and photovoltage curve, an ultrafine digital multimeter was connected to the electrodes of ZnO based DSSC with variable resistances. The light intensity of simulated source used was 100 mW/cm2. This is equivalent to one sun or AM (air mass) 1.5 of photon power that is delivered to the surface area of ZnO based DSSC. The photoelectric conversion efficiency (η) of DSSC depends upon four main parameters. These four parameters of DSSC are related as (1)
Efficiency
η
=
Current  Density
J
sc
×
Open  Circuit  Voltage
V
oc
×
Fill  Factor
P
in
.Here, the fill factor (ff) is the ratio of maximum power to the measured short circuit current density (J
sc) and open circuit voltage (V
oc) values. So, fill factor measurement is given as(2)
ff
=
Maximum  Power
P
m
a
x
×
J
sc
V
oc
.For measuring maximum power (P
m
a
x), first open circuit voltage is measured when the current value in the DSSC is almost zero. Similarly, short circuit current density is measured after inserting variable resistance (R) in shunt with the ZnO based DSSC circuit. Hence, maximum power (P
m
a
x) delivered with the DSSC is(3)
P
m
a
x
=
V
m
a
x
×
I
m
a
x
.The overall performance of ZnO based DSSC is basically dependent on the characteristics of the factors expressed above. For obtaining better results from polymer dye-sensitized ZnO solar cells, a lot of research works were carried out throughout the world to examine the various cell components/materials preparation methods, nature of hybrid material used, effect of processing factors on these materials, stability of dye, and performance of liquid electrolyte as well as conductive electrodes.


## 2.1. Materials and Measuring Instruments

For synthesis process, all the chemical materials were purchased from a commercial dealer and were used without further purification.1H NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) and 13C NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) spectra were recorded on Avance-II (Bruker) instrument, which was operated at 400 MHz for 1H NMR. The CHN (carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen) analysis was performed on PerkinElmer 2400 CHN Elemental Analyzer. For cation recognition studies, the UV-Vis absorption spectra were taken using dilute solutions in quartz cells (1 cm path length). The fluorescence profile of sensor solutions was recorded on PerkinElmer L55 Fluorescence spectrophotometer using 1 cm path length of quartz cells. Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) studies were conducted on samples obtained after drying the aqueous solutions of materials (10 μM) and SEM images were taken by JEOL JSM-6610LV scanning electron microscope which was operated at 15 KeV. The particle size of organic nanoparticles (ONPs) was determined by Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) using external probe feature of Microtrac Ultra Nanotrac Particle Size Analyzer instrument. For analyzing, 10 μM concentration of solution was used and presented results are the average of 20 scans × 240 pixels recorded with Camtasia recorder at 12 frames/s. The crystal structure of the ZnO powders was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) with a PANalytical X′PERT PRO diffractometer operated at 45 KV and 40 mA using Ni-filtered Cu Kα radiations with a scan speed of 10°/min for 2θ in a range from 10 to 75. The average crystalline size of polymer dye capped ZnO nanoparticles was calculated with Debye-Scherrer’s equation using XRD analysis data [31]. The DSSC performance was evaluated by measurement of current and voltage curves (with OMEGA DMM 101 digital multimeter) under simulated solar light source (Xenon Light Projector) with air mass (AM) 1.5 solar irradiation.


## 2.2. Synthesis of Polymer DyeA

Polymer dyeA was synthesized by reaction of 2-thiophenecarboxaldehyde (1, 1 mmol) and polyamine (2, 2.5 mmol) in dry methanol as shown in Figure 3. After the completion of reaction (TLC), solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. A pale yellow product was separated out and product was washed by methanol and polymer dye was characterized by 1H NMR and mass and IR and CHN spectroscopy. A light yellow solid was obtained in 87% yield (195 mg). mp (melting point) > 190°C; IR (KBr): ν
m
a
x 1660, 1532, 1245, 1222 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.10 (s, 4H, CH=N), 7.75–7.72 (m, 3H, ArHs), 7.66 (dd, 1H, ArH), 7.44–7.36 (m, 4H, ArHs), 7.22–7.13 (m, 4H, ArHs), 3.76 (t, 2H, CH2), 3.68 (t, 4H, CH2), 3.45–3.90 (m, 4H, CH2), 3.18 (s, 1H, NH), 3.07–2.91 (m, 4H, CH2), 2.85–2.69 (m, 6H, CH2), 2.61–2.50 (m, 6H, CH2), 2.54–2.50 (m, 4H, CH2), 2.45–2.42 (m, 4H, CH2), 2.38–2.33 (m, 4H, 2 × CH2), 1.91–1.85 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.65 (s, 1H, NH), 1.64 (s, 1H, NH), 1.63–1.55 (m, 1H, CH), 1.49–1.45 (m, 2H, CH2); MS (ESI): m
/
z 859 (M + Na+); Anal. calcd. For C42H62N10S4: C, 60.25; H, 7.70; N, 16.73 Found: C, 60.16; H, 7.59; N, 16.66%.


## 2.3. Preparation of Polymer DyeA Capped ZnO Nanoparticles

Initially, the solution of ZnO was synthesized by mixing the alcoholic solution of Zn(NO3)2·6H2O (595 mg, 2.0 mmol) with alcoholic solution of NaOH (120 mg, 3.0 mmol). A white product was separated out and the product was washed by ethanol. The product was dried at 150°C. Polymer dyeA was taken along with ZnO (100 mg) in dry CHCl3 and the solution was refluxed for 6 hours. The progress of dye coating was monitored by IR and UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy by taking a small sample from the reaction mixture at different intervals. Upon completion of reaction, light yellow colored solid polymer dyeA capped ZnO nanoparticles were separated out. Polymer dyeA capped ZnO nanoparticles were further washed with excess of methanol and dried under vacuum. Polymer dyeA capped ZnO nanoparticles were characterized using DLS, SEM, and solid state XRD [28].


## 2.4. Formation of Polymer-Ruthenium Metal Complex as Composite DyeB

The polymer compounds (604 mg, 3 mmol) were taken along with RuCl3 trihydrate complex (100 mg) in dry MeOH and the solution was refluxed for 10 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored by IR and UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy by taking a small sample from the reaction mixture. Upon completion of reaction, solution was concentrated, cooled, and stirred with petroleum ether. The resultant solid was washed by dichloromethane and dried in vacuum over anhydrous calcium chloride. Polymer Schiff base showed strong absorption band in the region of 1630–1660 cm−1. However, upon complexion with the metal it shifted to lower frequency indicating formation of the metal complex with CH=N. Hence, polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB was prepared and was used as a good light harvester in ZnO solar cell.


## 2.5. Fabrication of ZnO Based DSSC

For the fabrication of ZnO based DSSCs, we have prepared two different dyes: polymer dyeA and polymer-ruthenium metal complex dyeB, respectively. Both of the dyes were separately pasted on a cleaned and dried ITO conductive glass sheet, which acted as a photoanode. Further, polymer dyeA was prepared into a diluted form and processed for fabrication of ZnO based DSSC. The polymer dye capped thin sheet of ZnO nanoparticles was air-dried at room temperature (25°C). The surface area of this sheet was selected as 1.0 cm2. The conductive side of carbon dust (obtained from candle flame) coated counter electrode was placed on top of the anode sheet. A liquid electrolyte (iodide/tri-iodide) based solution was placed at the top of the conductive edge of cell. This liquid electrolyte was put into the space between the two conductive electrodes with capillary action. Thereafter, two good black binder clips were used to hold the electrodes together. The effective cell surface area was 1.0 cm2 as shown in Figure 2. The polymer dye capped ZnO nanoparticles layer was fixed on ITO conductive glass (as shown in Figures 2(A) and 2(B)). A counter electrode in the form of carbon dust flamed with a candle on another conductive ITO glass has been shown in Figure 2(C). Finally, the circuit assembly of ZnO based DSSC was ready for measuring different parameters, that is, short circuit current density (J
sc), open circuit voltage (V
oc), fill factor, and incident photoelectric conversion efficiency represented in Figure 2(D).Figure 2
Assembly sections of polymer decorated ZnO based DSSC. ((A) and (B)) Polymer dye capped ZnO nanoparticles in the form of a paste on ITO conductive sheet acting as a photoanode having a surface area 1 cm × 1 cm, (C) counter electrode acting as a cathode for DSSC made from candle dust, and (D) circuit diagram of DSSC for measuring current density and open circuit voltage for DSSC.Figure 3
Chemical structure of polymer dyeA.For measuring photovoltaic characteristics, that is, current density and photovoltage curve, an ultrafine digital multimeter was connected to the electrodes of ZnO based DSSC with variable resistances. The light intensity of simulated source used was 100 mW/cm2. This is equivalent to one sun or AM (air mass) 1.5 of photon power that is delivered to the surface area of ZnO based DSSC. The photoelectric conversion efficiency (η) of DSSC depends upon four main parameters. These four parameters of DSSC are related as (1)
Efficiency
η
=
Current  Density
J
sc
×
Open  Circuit  Voltage
V
oc
×
Fill  Factor
P
in
.Here, the fill factor (ff) is the ratio of maximum power to the measured short circuit current density (J
sc) and open circuit voltage (V
oc) values. So, fill factor measurement is given as(2)
ff
=
Maximum  Power
P
m
a
x
×
J
sc
V
oc
.For measuring maximum power (P
m
a
x), first open circuit voltage is measured when the current value in the DSSC is almost zero. Similarly, short circuit current density is measured after inserting variable resistance (R) in shunt with the ZnO based DSSC circuit. Hence, maximum power (P
m
a
x) delivered with the DSSC is(3)
P
m
a
x
=
V
m
a
x
×
I
m
a
x
.The overall performance of ZnO based DSSC is basically dependent on the characteristics of the factors expressed above. For obtaining better results from polymer dye-sensitized ZnO solar cells, a lot of research works were carried out throughout the world to examine the various cell components/materials preparation methods, nature of hybrid material used, effect of processing factors on these materials, stability of dye, and performance of liquid electrolyte as well as conductive electrodes.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Morphology of the Polymer Dye Capped ZnO Nanoparticles

The surface morphology and size distribution of polymer dye capped ZnO nanoparticles were investigated by SEM (JEOL JSM-6610) operated at 15 KV. SEM image of polymer dye capped on ZnO nanoparticles appears to be homogenously arranged (as shown in Figure4(a)). Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) elemental mapping images of polymer decorated ZnO nanoparticles confirmed the presence of finely dispersed zinc, carbon, and oxygen in nanoparticle (as shown in Figure 4(b)). In the EDS spectra of polymer decorated ZnO nanoparticles, all the characteristics peaks were well matched with their unique elements of Zn and O [32]. The carbon peak occurred due to the supporting substrate (organic material) used for SEM sampling. The atomic percentages (atomic %) of Zn, O, and C in the composition are 40.23%, 34.59%, and 25.18%, respectively.Figure 4
SEM image of ZnO nanoparticles: (a) high magnification image of polymer decorated ZnO nanoparticles and (b) EDS spectra of polymer decorated ZnO nanoparticles.
(a)
(b)DLS images analysis shown in Figure5 depicts that the size of polymer dye capped ZnO nanoparticles was found to be 7.45 nm, while, comparing with respect to JCPDS card (36-1451), the particle size was found to be 18 nm.Figure 5
DLS spectra of polymer dye capped ZnO nanoparticles.


### 3.2. Structural Investigations: X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

For structural investigations of ZnO nanoparticles, XRD spectrum was collected using PANalytical X′PERT PRO diffractometer. It was operated at 45 KV and 40 mA using Ni-filtered Cu Kα radiations with a scan speed of 10°/min for 2θ in a range from 10° to 75°. Crystallite size of the synthesized polymer dye capped ZnO nanoparticles was characterized and analyzed by using XRD technique. For comparison purpose, we had synthesized non-polymer decorated ZnO nanoparticles using the appropriate precursors. Debye-Scherrer’s equation [31], given by D
=
0.9
λ
/
(
β
cos
⁡
θ
), was used to compute the crystallite size of both capped and uncapped ZnO nanoparticles. In the above equation, D is crystallite size, β is the full width at half maxima (FWHM), and λ is giving the value of the wavelength of the copper (Cu) radiation. The particle size of uncapped ZnO nanoparticle was found to be 32 nm, which corresponds to different peaks in different planes (100), (101), (002), (102), (110), (103), and (112) as shown in Figure 6(b). In case of capped ZnO nanoparticles, XRD spectra (in Figure 6(a)) show the presence of broad peaks at 32.01°, 35.52°, 38.24°, 48.48°, 62.75°, 63.40°, and 65.33°. The broadening of large XRD peaks confirms that size of polymer capped ZnO nanoparticles was smaller compared to that of uncapped ZnO nanoparticles. While comparing with respect to JCPDS card (36-1451), particle size was found to be in range of 18 nm. Figure 6(b) illustrates that, with surface modifications, the peaks of the XRD pattern of polymer dye capped ZnO nanoparticles seemed to be broadened and main peaks were still in accordance with the wurtzite structure of ZnO, which indicates that the surface modified (polymer dye capped) ZnO nanoparticles do not affect the crystalline structure of ZnO. The aggregation of ZnO nanoparticles affects the practical applicability such as in case of dye-sensitized solar cells and display devices. Surface modification of ZnO nanoparticles is used to eliminate the aggregated surfactants. So, we had used 2-TPC as an effective functional group or legend to decorate polymer dye on ZnO nanoparticles.Figure 6
X-ray diffractogram of (a) uncapped ZnO nanoparticles and (b) polymer dyeA capped zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles.
(a)
(b)


### 3.3. Fluorescence Spectra of Dyes Capped ZnO Nanoparticles

The fluorescence spectra have been recorded by exciting the samples at the wavelength of 325 nm. The fluorescence spectra of three different samples A, B, and C (polymer dyeA (dil.) capped ZnO nanoparticles, polymer dyeA (conc.) capped ZnO nanoparticles, and polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB capped ZnO nanoparticles) showed the near to strong ultraviolet region (narrow high peaks) accompanied by the medium and small broadened peaks at visible region. Figure 7 showed a maximum excitation peak at 353 nm for polymer dyeA capped ZnO nanoparticles. For polymer-ruthenium metal complex composite dye, the fluorescence spectra showed an excitation peak at 352 nm. Similarly, the visible region of the photoluminescence spectra showed different peaks at 446 nm, 451 nm, and 460 nm for samples A, B, and C, respectively. An interesting observation in the fluorescence spectra was the IR emission at 697 nm and 701 nm for samples A and C. The blue-green emission for broadened spectrum peaks formed from surface defects was present in the ZnO material (as shown in Figure 7).Figure 7
Fluorescence spectra of different samples: (A) polymer dyeA (dil.) + ZnO, (B) polymer dyeA (conc.) + ZnO, and (C) polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB + ZnO.


### 3.4. UV-Visible Spectra of Dyes Capped ZnO Nanoparticles

The UV-visible portion depicted the significance of optoelectronic features of ZnO nanoparticles for different three samples A (diluted polymer dyeA), B (concentrated polymer dyeA), and C (polymer-ruthenium metal complex based composite dyeB). The measurements of UV-visible absorption spectra were recorded at room temperature. Figure 8 showed the significant absorbance peaks observed at 314 nm, 315 nm, and 317 nm for samples A, B, and C. The absorption peak for diluted polymer dyeA capped ZnO nanoparticles was observed at 314 nm; the absorbance peak showed less absorption compared to that of concentrated polymer dyeA based ZnO nanoparticles (315 nm) and polymer-ruthenium based composite dyeB (317 nm). The highest absorption peak appeared for polymer-ruthenium based composite dye molecules, that is, at 317 nm. Two more absorption bands had been observed at 395 nm and 451 nm for sample A. Similarly, for sample C, absorption bands had been observed at 394 nm and at 445 nm. For sample B, a small absorption band had been observed at 420 nm. Hence, sample C showed high light harvesting capability due to the transfer of composite dye molecules from donor to acceptor region after capping of 2-TPC and PEI to ZnO nanoparticles. The corresponding shifts in the absorption spectra resulted due to the quantum confinement effect that occurred in ZnO nanoparticles [33, 34].Figure 8
UV-visible spectra of different samples: (A) polymer dyeA (dil.) + ZnO, (B) polymer dyeA (conc.) + ZnO, and (C) polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB + ZnO.


### 3.5. Photovoltaic Performances of Hybrid ZnO Based DSSCs

The current density and voltage characteristics of polymer decorated hybrid ZnO DSSCs had been recorded for different samples A, B, and C by varied external resistances under simulated sunlight illuminations or AM 1.5 solar conditions (shown in Figure9). The various dye-sensitized solar cell parameters, for example, current density, open circuit voltage, fill factor (FF), thickness of photoanode layer, and solar energy-to-electricity conversion efficiency (η) of polymer decorated hybrid ZnO DSSCs, were calculated and presented in Table 1. The photovoltaic performances of ZnO based DSSCs were calculated under simulated photo illumination (100 mW/cm2). The maximum power conversion efficiency had been recorded and calculated for polymer-ruthenium metal complex based composite dyeB sensitized solar cell. The photovoltaic parameters for the polymer-ruthenium based composite dyeB based ZnO DSSC (sample C) showed an open circuit voltage (V
oc) of 0.83 volts, a short circuit current density (J
sc) of 12.6 mA/cm2, a fill factor of 65%, and an overall photon-to-electric power conversion efficiency (η) of 5.28%. In order to compare this photovoltaic performance with other DSSCs, (η) was measured at 3.50%, with V
oc of 0.67 volts, short circuit current density of 8.7 mA/cm2, and fill factor of 60% in case of concentrated polymer dyeA based ZnO DSSC (sample B). The least photovoltaic performance was recorded in case of diluted polymer dyeA only. In this case, the power conversion efficiency (η) measured was 1.40%, with an open circuit voltage (V
oc) of 0.55 volts, short circuit current density of 4.4 mA/cm2, and fill factor of 58%. The thickness of the photoanodes (in μm) for the current ZnO based DSSCs showed a significant increase in the photon-to-electric power conversion efficiency. The thickness of the photoanode layers was calculated to be 10.57 μm, 16.11 μm, and 25.40 μm for samples A, B, and C, respectively, by using 3 micromolars per centimeter square and the calculations were performed as per the method given in the literature [35–37]. The coating of another material over the parent ZnO leads to increase in the thickness of the coating. This is due to the increase in the composite molecular weight and eventually increases the thickness of the photoanode layer. However, the increase in the size of composite leads to decrease in the surface over mass ratio and vice versa. As the thickness of polymer capped ZnO photoanode layer increases for an effective surface area (1.0 cm2) of the cell, the electrons recombine easily with the redox coupler within the cell and hence the power conversion efficiency of ZnO based DSSC increases (shown in Figure 10). The thickness of each photoanode (for samples A, B, and C) has an exclusive dye adsorption time period at which the maximum photon-to-electric power conversion efficiency occurs. The dye adsorption times recorded for samples A, B, and C were 1 hour, 1.5 hours, and 2.0 hours, respectively. A comparison of thickness of photoanode and power conversion efficiency (η) of ZnO based DSSCs for different samples A, B, and C is shown in Figure 10. A maximum power conversion efficiency of 5.27% has been recorded for a photoanode thickness of 25.40 μm for sample C based DSSC.Table 1
Photovoltaic performances of hybrid ZnO based dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) under simulated solar illuminations (AM 1.5).
Sample name
Name of DSSC
Open circuit voltageV
o
c (volts)
Short circuit current densityJ
s
c (mA/cm2)
Fill factor (FF)
Thickness of photoanode layer (μm)
Efficiency of DSSC (η %)
A
Polymer dyeA (dil.) + ZnO DSSC
0.55
4.4
58%
10.57
1.40
B
Polymer dyeA (conc.) + ZnO DSSC
0.67
8.7
60%
16.11
3.50
C
Polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB + ZnO DSSC
0.83
12.6
65%
25.40
5.28Figure 9
Current density and photovoltage response curves for different ZnO based DSSCs: (A) polymer dyeA (dil.) + ZnO, (B) polymer dyeA (conc.) + ZnO, and (C) polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB + ZnO based DSSC.Figure 10
Comparison of thickness of photoanode and power conversion efficiency (η) of samples (A) polymer dyeA (dil.), (B) polymer dyeA (conc.), and (C) polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB decorated ZnO based DSSCs.The highest recorded efficiency for polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB capped ZnO DSSC was enhanced by 1.78% and 3.87% compared to that of polymer dyeA (conc.) capped and polymer dyeA (dil.) capped ZnO DSSCs. This significant improvement in the photon-to-electric power conversion efficiency was due to the good dye absorption stage and induced charge carrier injection of electrons from LUMO of polymer dye material to conduction band of ruthenium metal complex molecules. Polymer dye and ruthenium metal complex based hybrid nanostructure can also be useful in various photoluminescent applications other than DSSCs.


### 3.6. IPCE Spectra of Hybrid ZnO Based DSSCs

The incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) spectra for polymer dye capped ZnO based DSSCs were measured as shown in Figure11. IPCE is defined as the total number of collected charge carriers (electrons) per incident photon. IPCE is evaluated by measuring the short circuit current density (J
sc) at different wavelengths (λ) within the spectrum using [38] (4)
IPCE
%
=
1240
J
sc
λ
·
P
in
,where λ is the wavelength, J
sc is short circuit current density (mA/cm2), and P
in is the incident radiative power (mW/cm2). Figure 11 shows the comparison of IPCE spectra for ZnO based DSSCs fabricated from polymer dyeA (dil.), polymer dyeA (conc.), and polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB, respectively. The IPCE spectra of polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB display a broader band between 300 nm and 750 nm compared to polymer dyeA (dil.) and polymer dyeA (conc.). The trend of significant enhancement of IPCE spectra follows the good short circuit current density (J
sc) and optimal efficiency (η) of the solar cell.Figure 11
IPCE spectra of ZnO based DSSCs for polymer dyeA (dil.), polymer dyeA (conc.), and polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB.


## 3.1. Morphology of the Polymer Dye Capped ZnO Nanoparticles

The surface morphology and size distribution of polymer dye capped ZnO nanoparticles were investigated by SEM (JEOL JSM-6610) operated at 15 KV. SEM image of polymer dye capped on ZnO nanoparticles appears to be homogenously arranged (as shown in Figure4(a)). Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) elemental mapping images of polymer decorated ZnO nanoparticles confirmed the presence of finely dispersed zinc, carbon, and oxygen in nanoparticle (as shown in Figure 4(b)). In the EDS spectra of polymer decorated ZnO nanoparticles, all the characteristics peaks were well matched with their unique elements of Zn and O [32]. The carbon peak occurred due to the supporting substrate (organic material) used for SEM sampling. The atomic percentages (atomic %) of Zn, O, and C in the composition are 40.23%, 34.59%, and 25.18%, respectively.Figure 4
SEM image of ZnO nanoparticles: (a) high magnification image of polymer decorated ZnO nanoparticles and (b) EDS spectra of polymer decorated ZnO nanoparticles.
(a)
(b)DLS images analysis shown in Figure5 depicts that the size of polymer dye capped ZnO nanoparticles was found to be 7.45 nm, while, comparing with respect to JCPDS card (36-1451), the particle size was found to be 18 nm.Figure 5
DLS spectra of polymer dye capped ZnO nanoparticles.


## 3.2. Structural Investigations: X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

For structural investigations of ZnO nanoparticles, XRD spectrum was collected using PANalytical X′PERT PRO diffractometer. It was operated at 45 KV and 40 mA using Ni-filtered Cu Kα radiations with a scan speed of 10°/min for 2θ in a range from 10° to 75°. Crystallite size of the synthesized polymer dye capped ZnO nanoparticles was characterized and analyzed by using XRD technique. For comparison purpose, we had synthesized non-polymer decorated ZnO nanoparticles using the appropriate precursors. Debye-Scherrer’s equation [31], given by D
=
0.9
λ
/
(
β
cos
⁡
θ
), was used to compute the crystallite size of both capped and uncapped ZnO nanoparticles. In the above equation, D is crystallite size, β is the full width at half maxima (FWHM), and λ is giving the value of the wavelength of the copper (Cu) radiation. The particle size of uncapped ZnO nanoparticle was found to be 32 nm, which corresponds to different peaks in different planes (100), (101), (002), (102), (110), (103), and (112) as shown in Figure 6(b). In case of capped ZnO nanoparticles, XRD spectra (in Figure 6(a)) show the presence of broad peaks at 32.01°, 35.52°, 38.24°, 48.48°, 62.75°, 63.40°, and 65.33°. The broadening of large XRD peaks confirms that size of polymer capped ZnO nanoparticles was smaller compared to that of uncapped ZnO nanoparticles. While comparing with respect to JCPDS card (36-1451), particle size was found to be in range of 18 nm. Figure 6(b) illustrates that, with surface modifications, the peaks of the XRD pattern of polymer dye capped ZnO nanoparticles seemed to be broadened and main peaks were still in accordance with the wurtzite structure of ZnO, which indicates that the surface modified (polymer dye capped) ZnO nanoparticles do not affect the crystalline structure of ZnO. The aggregation of ZnO nanoparticles affects the practical applicability such as in case of dye-sensitized solar cells and display devices. Surface modification of ZnO nanoparticles is used to eliminate the aggregated surfactants. So, we had used 2-TPC as an effective functional group or legend to decorate polymer dye on ZnO nanoparticles.Figure 6
X-ray diffractogram of (a) uncapped ZnO nanoparticles and (b) polymer dyeA capped zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles.
(a)
(b)


## 3.3. Fluorescence Spectra of Dyes Capped ZnO Nanoparticles

The fluorescence spectra have been recorded by exciting the samples at the wavelength of 325 nm. The fluorescence spectra of three different samples A, B, and C (polymer dyeA (dil.) capped ZnO nanoparticles, polymer dyeA (conc.) capped ZnO nanoparticles, and polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB capped ZnO nanoparticles) showed the near to strong ultraviolet region (narrow high peaks) accompanied by the medium and small broadened peaks at visible region. Figure 7 showed a maximum excitation peak at 353 nm for polymer dyeA capped ZnO nanoparticles. For polymer-ruthenium metal complex composite dye, the fluorescence spectra showed an excitation peak at 352 nm. Similarly, the visible region of the photoluminescence spectra showed different peaks at 446 nm, 451 nm, and 460 nm for samples A, B, and C, respectively. An interesting observation in the fluorescence spectra was the IR emission at 697 nm and 701 nm for samples A and C. The blue-green emission for broadened spectrum peaks formed from surface defects was present in the ZnO material (as shown in Figure 7).Figure 7
Fluorescence spectra of different samples: (A) polymer dyeA (dil.) + ZnO, (B) polymer dyeA (conc.) + ZnO, and (C) polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB + ZnO.


## 3.4. UV-Visible Spectra of Dyes Capped ZnO Nanoparticles

The UV-visible portion depicted the significance of optoelectronic features of ZnO nanoparticles for different three samples A (diluted polymer dyeA), B (concentrated polymer dyeA), and C (polymer-ruthenium metal complex based composite dyeB). The measurements of UV-visible absorption spectra were recorded at room temperature. Figure 8 showed the significant absorbance peaks observed at 314 nm, 315 nm, and 317 nm for samples A, B, and C. The absorption peak for diluted polymer dyeA capped ZnO nanoparticles was observed at 314 nm; the absorbance peak showed less absorption compared to that of concentrated polymer dyeA based ZnO nanoparticles (315 nm) and polymer-ruthenium based composite dyeB (317 nm). The highest absorption peak appeared for polymer-ruthenium based composite dye molecules, that is, at 317 nm. Two more absorption bands had been observed at 395 nm and 451 nm for sample A. Similarly, for sample C, absorption bands had been observed at 394 nm and at 445 nm. For sample B, a small absorption band had been observed at 420 nm. Hence, sample C showed high light harvesting capability due to the transfer of composite dye molecules from donor to acceptor region after capping of 2-TPC and PEI to ZnO nanoparticles. The corresponding shifts in the absorption spectra resulted due to the quantum confinement effect that occurred in ZnO nanoparticles [33, 34].Figure 8
UV-visible spectra of different samples: (A) polymer dyeA (dil.) + ZnO, (B) polymer dyeA (conc.) + ZnO, and (C) polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB + ZnO.


## 3.5. Photovoltaic Performances of Hybrid ZnO Based DSSCs

The current density and voltage characteristics of polymer decorated hybrid ZnO DSSCs had been recorded for different samples A, B, and C by varied external resistances under simulated sunlight illuminations or AM 1.5 solar conditions (shown in Figure9). The various dye-sensitized solar cell parameters, for example, current density, open circuit voltage, fill factor (FF), thickness of photoanode layer, and solar energy-to-electricity conversion efficiency (η) of polymer decorated hybrid ZnO DSSCs, were calculated and presented in Table 1. The photovoltaic performances of ZnO based DSSCs were calculated under simulated photo illumination (100 mW/cm2). The maximum power conversion efficiency had been recorded and calculated for polymer-ruthenium metal complex based composite dyeB sensitized solar cell. The photovoltaic parameters for the polymer-ruthenium based composite dyeB based ZnO DSSC (sample C) showed an open circuit voltage (V
oc) of 0.83 volts, a short circuit current density (J
sc) of 12.6 mA/cm2, a fill factor of 65%, and an overall photon-to-electric power conversion efficiency (η) of 5.28%. In order to compare this photovoltaic performance with other DSSCs, (η) was measured at 3.50%, with V
oc of 0.67 volts, short circuit current density of 8.7 mA/cm2, and fill factor of 60% in case of concentrated polymer dyeA based ZnO DSSC (sample B). The least photovoltaic performance was recorded in case of diluted polymer dyeA only. In this case, the power conversion efficiency (η) measured was 1.40%, with an open circuit voltage (V
oc) of 0.55 volts, short circuit current density of 4.4 mA/cm2, and fill factor of 58%. The thickness of the photoanodes (in μm) for the current ZnO based DSSCs showed a significant increase in the photon-to-electric power conversion efficiency. The thickness of the photoanode layers was calculated to be 10.57 μm, 16.11 μm, and 25.40 μm for samples A, B, and C, respectively, by using 3 micromolars per centimeter square and the calculations were performed as per the method given in the literature [35–37]. The coating of another material over the parent ZnO leads to increase in the thickness of the coating. This is due to the increase in the composite molecular weight and eventually increases the thickness of the photoanode layer. However, the increase in the size of composite leads to decrease in the surface over mass ratio and vice versa. As the thickness of polymer capped ZnO photoanode layer increases for an effective surface area (1.0 cm2) of the cell, the electrons recombine easily with the redox coupler within the cell and hence the power conversion efficiency of ZnO based DSSC increases (shown in Figure 10). The thickness of each photoanode (for samples A, B, and C) has an exclusive dye adsorption time period at which the maximum photon-to-electric power conversion efficiency occurs. The dye adsorption times recorded for samples A, B, and C were 1 hour, 1.5 hours, and 2.0 hours, respectively. A comparison of thickness of photoanode and power conversion efficiency (η) of ZnO based DSSCs for different samples A, B, and C is shown in Figure 10. A maximum power conversion efficiency of 5.27% has been recorded for a photoanode thickness of 25.40 μm for sample C based DSSC.Table 1
Photovoltaic performances of hybrid ZnO based dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) under simulated solar illuminations (AM 1.5).
Sample name
Name of DSSC
Open circuit voltageV
o
c (volts)
Short circuit current densityJ
s
c (mA/cm2)
Fill factor (FF)
Thickness of photoanode layer (μm)
Efficiency of DSSC (η %)
A
Polymer dyeA (dil.) + ZnO DSSC
0.55
4.4
58%
10.57
1.40
B
Polymer dyeA (conc.) + ZnO DSSC
0.67
8.7
60%
16.11
3.50
C
Polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB + ZnO DSSC
0.83
12.6
65%
25.40
5.28Figure 9
Current density and photovoltage response curves for different ZnO based DSSCs: (A) polymer dyeA (dil.) + ZnO, (B) polymer dyeA (conc.) + ZnO, and (C) polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB + ZnO based DSSC.Figure 10
Comparison of thickness of photoanode and power conversion efficiency (η) of samples (A) polymer dyeA (dil.), (B) polymer dyeA (conc.), and (C) polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB decorated ZnO based DSSCs.The highest recorded efficiency for polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB capped ZnO DSSC was enhanced by 1.78% and 3.87% compared to that of polymer dyeA (conc.) capped and polymer dyeA (dil.) capped ZnO DSSCs. This significant improvement in the photon-to-electric power conversion efficiency was due to the good dye absorption stage and induced charge carrier injection of electrons from LUMO of polymer dye material to conduction band of ruthenium metal complex molecules. Polymer dye and ruthenium metal complex based hybrid nanostructure can also be useful in various photoluminescent applications other than DSSCs.


## 3.6. IPCE Spectra of Hybrid ZnO Based DSSCs

The incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) spectra for polymer dye capped ZnO based DSSCs were measured as shown in Figure11. IPCE is defined as the total number of collected charge carriers (electrons) per incident photon. IPCE is evaluated by measuring the short circuit current density (J
sc) at different wavelengths (λ) within the spectrum using [38] (4)
IPCE
%
=
1240
J
sc
λ
·
P
in
,where λ is the wavelength, J
sc is short circuit current density (mA/cm2), and P
in is the incident radiative power (mW/cm2). Figure 11 shows the comparison of IPCE spectra for ZnO based DSSCs fabricated from polymer dyeA (dil.), polymer dyeA (conc.), and polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB, respectively. The IPCE spectra of polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB display a broader band between 300 nm and 750 nm compared to polymer dyeA (dil.) and polymer dyeA (conc.). The trend of significant enhancement of IPCE spectra follows the good short circuit current density (J
sc) and optimal efficiency (η) of the solar cell.Figure 11
IPCE spectra of ZnO based DSSCs for polymer dyeA (dil.), polymer dyeA (conc.), and polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB.


## 4. Conclusion

In this research work, we have synthesized, characterized, and evaluated the optoelectronic and photovoltaic performances of polymer decorated organic-inorganic hybrid ZnO based dye-sensitized solar cells. For evaluating the performances of the first two samples of ZnO DSSCs, we have used a capping agent 2-thiophenecarboxaldehyde (2-TPC). In the third case, polymer-ruthenium metal complex based composite dye had been prepared and was used as a good dying agent in the fabrication of ZnO DSSC. Polymer dyeA and polymer-ruthenium metal complex based composite dye B decorated ZnO DSSCs had shown significant optical and photophysical properties. The polymer-ruthenium composite dyeB based ZnO DSSC had attained the highest power conversion efficiency of 5.28%, which was enhanced by 1.78% and 3.88% compared to polymer dyeA (concentrated) and polymer dyeA (diluted) based ZnO DSSCs, respectively. Ruthenium metal complex acted as a good sensitizer for increasing the light harvesting capacity of ZnO solar cell. Hence, the nature of hybrid organic/inorganic ZnO based DSSC performed efficiently for converting solar radiations into electricity and can be implemented commercially for potential optoelectronic and photovoltaic applications.



---

*Source: 9081346-2016-09-29.xml*