# Process Optimization and Wear Behavior of Red Mud Reinforced Aluminum Composites

Authors: Rajesh Shanmugavel; Thirumalai Kumaran Sundaresan; Uthayakumar Marimuthu; Pethuraj Manickaraj
Journal: Advances in Tribology
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

This work presents the application of hybrid approach for optimizing the dry sliding wear behavior of red mud based aluminum metal matrix composites (MMCs). The essential input parameters are identified as applied load, sliding velocity, wt.% of reinforcement, and hardness of the counterpart material, whereas the output responses are specific wear rate and Coefficient of Friction (COF). The Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) is performed to optimize the multiple performance characteristics simultaneously. The Principle Component Analysis (PCA) and entropy methods are applied to evaluate the values of weights corresponding to each output response. The experimental result shows that the wt.% of reinforcements (Q=34.9%) followed by the sliding velocity (Q=34.5%) contributed more to affecting the dry sliding wear behavior. The optimized conditions are verified through the confirmation test, which exhibited an improvement in the grey relational grade of specific wear rate and COF by 0.3 and 0.034, respectively.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Aluminum MMCs created an interest to several industries, due to their high stiffness, specific strength, and superior wear resistance behavior, compared to unreinforced aluminum alloys. The superior mechanical and physical property leads to the use of these composites in automobile and engineering components where wear, tear, and seizure resistance are essential. Particulate MMCs are of special interest owing to the low cost of their raw materials and their ease of fabrication, making them suitable for applications requiring relatively high volume production. Among the different reinforcement materials, red mud is an emerging reinforcement because of its low cost and huge availability. Red mud emerged as the major waste material during the production of alumina from bauxite by Bayer’s process. The estimated annual rate of production of red mud is nearly 30 million tons a year. The effective use of such waste material is essential in today’s scenario.For any industrial or commercial applications the wear behavior plays a major role in determining the product life. However, the wear behaviors of red mud reinforced aluminum MMCs have not been examined by the researchers, which makes this work novel. Gopalakrishnan and Murugan [1] prepared Al-TiCp composite with different volume fraction of TiC, in an argon atmosphere by an enhanced stir casting method. They reported that the specific strength and the wear resistance of the composite were increased with higher % of TiC addition. Jo et al. [2] discussed the effect of SiC particle size on the wear properties of magnesium based hybrid metal matrix composites and suggested that the composite with large size SiC particles can improve the wear resistance compared with the smaller size particles. Alidokht et al. [3] incorporated SiC and MoS2 particles into the matrix of A356 Al alloy to form a hybrid composite. They showed that the MoS2 rich layer was on the top of the worn surface, which helped to decrease the plastic deformation in subsurface region and alleviated severe wear. Rao et al. [4] have prepared the wear mechanism map for aluminum matrix composite and observed that there are four wear regimes; they are ultramild wear, mild wear or oxidative wear, delamination wear, and severe wear.The GRA provides an efficient solution to the uncertainty, multi-input, and discrete data problem. In recent years, it has become a powerful tool for improving productivity during research and development, so that high quality products can be produced quickly and at low cost. Sahoo and Pal [5] used GRA as performance index to study the behavior of electroless Ni-P coating with respect to friction and wear characteristics. They reported that the interaction of load and time had significant influence on tribological performance. Siriyala et al. [6] investigated the dry sliding wear behavior of SiC reinforced aluminum composites produced using the molten metal mixing method. The optimization was performed using GRA and the results indicated that the sliding velocity was the most effective factor among the control parameters on dry sliding wear, followed by the reinforcement percentage, sliding distance, and contact stress. Soy et al. [7] studied the wear behaviors of A360 matrix reinforced with SiC and B4C ceramic particles using Taguchi method. They have concluded that the type of the material, applied load, and sliding speed exert a great effect on the specific wear rate, at 48.13%, 31.83%, and 8.77%, respectively.In GRA, the grey relational grade is calculated by averaging the grey relational coefficient corresponding to each quality characteristic. However, the importance of each quality characteristic may be different. To overcome this problem, entropy measurement method is generally used for calculating the weighing factor of different quality characteristics. Apart from that, PCA is also used for determining the weighting values to calculate the grey relational grade. This study proposes GRA to optimize the dry sliding wear behavior of red mud reinforced aluminum composite. The work takes account of the correlation between the input parameters and the output quality characteristics. The corresponding weighting values of each parameter are determined by PCA and entropy method. The specific wear rate and COF are considered as the output quality parameters for the experiments. Finally, the worn surface morphology is observed using Scanning Electron Microscopic (SEM) image.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Composite Preparation

The powder metallurgy technique is adopted to fabricate the aluminum MMCs. The matrix material used in this study is aluminum powder with 99% purity with an average particle size of 150 to 300μm. Red mud of angular shape is used as the reinforcement material (Al2O3—16.8%, SiO2—15.2%, Na2O3—11.87%, Mn—1.2%, P2O5—0.67%, CaO—2.45%, TiO2—3.7%, Fe2O3—33.8%, and Zn—0.018%) with an average particle size of 1.8 to 4 μm. The density of the aluminum and red mud is 2.7 and 3.2 g/cm3, respectively.The preprocessing is done with the ball mill and it is sieved to get uniform size of reinforcement material. The sieved red mud particle size is measured by Malvern laser particle size analyzer. The aluminum with various wt.% of red mud particles (3, 4, and 5 wt.%) is measured and mixed in the planetary ball mill for 2 hours at a constant speed of 150 rpm. The ball-to-powder ratio is maintained as 10 : 1 and liquid ethanol is used as the process control agent. The required number of samples is fabricated by applying a load of 300 kN, with a sintering temperature and sintering time as 600°C and 60 min, respectively. The distribution of reinforcement in the composite is examined using SEM and is shown in Figures1(a)–1(c).Figure 1
Dispersion of red mud (a) 3 wt.%, (b) 4 wt.%, and (c) 5 wt.%.
(a)
(b)
(c)


### 2.2. Wear Test

The pin on disc apparatus is used to evaluate the specific wear rate and COF of the specimens. The specific wear rate is the wear volume divided by the product of the normal load and the sliding distance. COF is the ratio between the frictional force and the normal force [8]. The experimental facility is shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
Experimental facility.Tests are conducted under dry sliding conditions as per ASTM G99-95 (2010) at a room temperature of 27°C and relative humidity of 55%. The applied load ranges from 10 to 50 N in steps of 20 N, with sliding velocity of 2–4 m/s in steps of 1 m/s and constant sliding distance of 3000 m. The pin (diameter = 10 mm, length = 30 mm) is initially cleaned with acetone and weighed using a digital electronic balance with a least count of 0.1 mg. EN32 steel with 58 and 60 HRC and alumina oxide with 62 HRC are used as the counterpart material (diameter = 200 mm). The weight loss of the pin and the frictional force between the interfaces are measured.


### 2.3. Grey Relational Analysis

The following steps are to be carried out to optimize the multiperformance characteristics through GRA.Step 1 (signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio).
In Taguchi method, theS/N ratio is used to represent the performance characteristic and the largest value of S/N ratio is required. The three types of S/N ratio are lower-the-better, higher-the-better, and nominal-the-better [9]. The selected output responses such as specific wear rate and COF are lower-the-better characteristics which can be expressed as(1)ηij=-10log⁡1n∑j=1nyij2,where ηij is the jth S/N ratio of the ith experiment, yij is the ith experiment at the jth test, and n is the total number of the tests.Step 2 (data preprocessing).
Data preprocessing is the process of transferring the original sequence to a comparable sequence. For this purpose, the experimental results are normalized in the range between zero and one. The normalization for lower-the-better characteristics can be expressed as(2)Xi0k=max⁡Xi0k-Xi0kmax⁡Xi0k-min⁡Xi0k,where Xi0k is the value after the grey relational generation (data preprocessing), max⁡Xi0k is the largest value of Xi0k, min⁡Xi0k is the smallest value of Xi0k, and X0 is the desired value.Step 3 (grey relational coefficient).
The grey relational coefficient is calculated to express the relationship between the ideal and actual normalized experimental results. The grey relational coefficient can be expressed as(3)ξik=Δmin+ς·ΔmaxΔoik+ς·Δmax,where ξik is the grey relational coefficient, Δoik is the deviation sequence of the reference sequence X0k and the comparability sequence Xik, namely(4)Δoik=X0k-Xik,Δmax=max∀j∈i⁡max∀k⁡X0k-Xjk,Δmin=min∀j∈i⁡min∀k⁡X0k-Xjk,and ς is distinguishing or identification coefficient: ς∈0,1=0.5 is generally used.Step 4 (grey relational grade).
The average of the grey relational coefficient is calculated to obtain the grey relational grade. The grey relational grade is defined as(5)γi=∑k=1nwkξik,where wk represents the normalized weighting value of factor k. In GRA, the grey relational grade is used to show the relationship among the sequences. If two sequences are identical, then the value of grey relational grade is equal to 1 [10]. The grey relational grade also indicates the degree of influence that the comparability sequence could exert over the reference sequence. Therefore, if a particular comparability sequence is more important than the other comparability sequence to the reference sequence, then the grey relational grade for that comparability sequence and reference sequence will be higher than other grey relational grades. In this study the weighting value (wk) is obtained from the principal component analysis and by entropy method.


### 2.4. Principal Component Analysis and Entropy Method

PCA approach explains the structure of variance-covariance by way of the linear combinations of each performance characteristic. It is a statistical method which uses an orthogonal transformation to convert the correlated variables into linearly uncorrelated variables called principal components [11]. The total number of principal components will be less than or equal to the number of original variables. The first principal component has the largest possible variance and each subsequent component has the highest variance with a constraint that it is orthogonal to the preceding components. The uncorrelated principal component is formulated as(6)Ymk=∑i=1nXmi·Vik,where Ym1 is the first principal component and Ym2 is the second principal component and so on. The principal components are aligned in descending order with respect to variance, and therefore the first principal component Ym1 accounts for most variance in the data.Entropy is a measure of irregularity of states such as imbalance and uncertainty. As applying the concept to the weight measurement, an attribute with a large entropy means it has a great diversity of responses. Thus the attribute has more significant influence on the response. The entropy is a mapping functionfi:[0,1]→[0,1] used to satisfy all these conditions: fi(0)=0 and fi(x)=fi(1-x) and fi(x) is monotonic increasing in the range x∈(0,0.5). Thus, we(x) can be used as the mapping function in entropy measure, where wex=xe1-x+1-xex-1. The maximum value of function occurs at x=0 and the value of e0.5-1=0.6478.Initially, the normalized coefficient, entropy of each quality characteristic (ej), and the total sum of entropy (E) are calculated. Then the weight of each quality characteristic is calculated as(7)wj=1/p-E1-ej∑j=1p1/p-E1-ej,j=1,…,p.


## 2.1. Composite Preparation

The powder metallurgy technique is adopted to fabricate the aluminum MMCs. The matrix material used in this study is aluminum powder with 99% purity with an average particle size of 150 to 300μm. Red mud of angular shape is used as the reinforcement material (Al2O3—16.8%, SiO2—15.2%, Na2O3—11.87%, Mn—1.2%, P2O5—0.67%, CaO—2.45%, TiO2—3.7%, Fe2O3—33.8%, and Zn—0.018%) with an average particle size of 1.8 to 4 μm. The density of the aluminum and red mud is 2.7 and 3.2 g/cm3, respectively.The preprocessing is done with the ball mill and it is sieved to get uniform size of reinforcement material. The sieved red mud particle size is measured by Malvern laser particle size analyzer. The aluminum with various wt.% of red mud particles (3, 4, and 5 wt.%) is measured and mixed in the planetary ball mill for 2 hours at a constant speed of 150 rpm. The ball-to-powder ratio is maintained as 10 : 1 and liquid ethanol is used as the process control agent. The required number of samples is fabricated by applying a load of 300 kN, with a sintering temperature and sintering time as 600°C and 60 min, respectively. The distribution of reinforcement in the composite is examined using SEM and is shown in Figures1(a)–1(c).Figure 1
Dispersion of red mud (a) 3 wt.%, (b) 4 wt.%, and (c) 5 wt.%.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 2.2. Wear Test

The pin on disc apparatus is used to evaluate the specific wear rate and COF of the specimens. The specific wear rate is the wear volume divided by the product of the normal load and the sliding distance. COF is the ratio between the frictional force and the normal force [8]. The experimental facility is shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
Experimental facility.Tests are conducted under dry sliding conditions as per ASTM G99-95 (2010) at a room temperature of 27°C and relative humidity of 55%. The applied load ranges from 10 to 50 N in steps of 20 N, with sliding velocity of 2–4 m/s in steps of 1 m/s and constant sliding distance of 3000 m. The pin (diameter = 10 mm, length = 30 mm) is initially cleaned with acetone and weighed using a digital electronic balance with a least count of 0.1 mg. EN32 steel with 58 and 60 HRC and alumina oxide with 62 HRC are used as the counterpart material (diameter = 200 mm). The weight loss of the pin and the frictional force between the interfaces are measured.


## 2.3. Grey Relational Analysis

The following steps are to be carried out to optimize the multiperformance characteristics through GRA.Step 1 (signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio).
In Taguchi method, theS/N ratio is used to represent the performance characteristic and the largest value of S/N ratio is required. The three types of S/N ratio are lower-the-better, higher-the-better, and nominal-the-better [9]. The selected output responses such as specific wear rate and COF are lower-the-better characteristics which can be expressed as(1)ηij=-10log⁡1n∑j=1nyij2,where ηij is the jth S/N ratio of the ith experiment, yij is the ith experiment at the jth test, and n is the total number of the tests.Step 2 (data preprocessing).
Data preprocessing is the process of transferring the original sequence to a comparable sequence. For this purpose, the experimental results are normalized in the range between zero and one. The normalization for lower-the-better characteristics can be expressed as(2)Xi0k=max⁡Xi0k-Xi0kmax⁡Xi0k-min⁡Xi0k,where Xi0k is the value after the grey relational generation (data preprocessing), max⁡Xi0k is the largest value of Xi0k, min⁡Xi0k is the smallest value of Xi0k, and X0 is the desired value.Step 3 (grey relational coefficient).
The grey relational coefficient is calculated to express the relationship between the ideal and actual normalized experimental results. The grey relational coefficient can be expressed as(3)ξik=Δmin+ς·ΔmaxΔoik+ς·Δmax,where ξik is the grey relational coefficient, Δoik is the deviation sequence of the reference sequence X0k and the comparability sequence Xik, namely(4)Δoik=X0k-Xik,Δmax=max∀j∈i⁡max∀k⁡X0k-Xjk,Δmin=min∀j∈i⁡min∀k⁡X0k-Xjk,and ς is distinguishing or identification coefficient: ς∈0,1=0.5 is generally used.Step 4 (grey relational grade).
The average of the grey relational coefficient is calculated to obtain the grey relational grade. The grey relational grade is defined as(5)γi=∑k=1nwkξik,where wk represents the normalized weighting value of factor k. In GRA, the grey relational grade is used to show the relationship among the sequences. If two sequences are identical, then the value of grey relational grade is equal to 1 [10]. The grey relational grade also indicates the degree of influence that the comparability sequence could exert over the reference sequence. Therefore, if a particular comparability sequence is more important than the other comparability sequence to the reference sequence, then the grey relational grade for that comparability sequence and reference sequence will be higher than other grey relational grades. In this study the weighting value (wk) is obtained from the principal component analysis and by entropy method.


## 2.4. Principal Component Analysis and Entropy Method

PCA approach explains the structure of variance-covariance by way of the linear combinations of each performance characteristic. It is a statistical method which uses an orthogonal transformation to convert the correlated variables into linearly uncorrelated variables called principal components [11]. The total number of principal components will be less than or equal to the number of original variables. The first principal component has the largest possible variance and each subsequent component has the highest variance with a constraint that it is orthogonal to the preceding components. The uncorrelated principal component is formulated as(6)Ymk=∑i=1nXmi·Vik,where Ym1 is the first principal component and Ym2 is the second principal component and so on. The principal components are aligned in descending order with respect to variance, and therefore the first principal component Ym1 accounts for most variance in the data.Entropy is a measure of irregularity of states such as imbalance and uncertainty. As applying the concept to the weight measurement, an attribute with a large entropy means it has a great diversity of responses. Thus the attribute has more significant influence on the response. The entropy is a mapping functionfi:[0,1]→[0,1] used to satisfy all these conditions: fi(0)=0 and fi(x)=fi(1-x) and fi(x) is monotonic increasing in the range x∈(0,0.5). Thus, we(x) can be used as the mapping function in entropy measure, where wex=xe1-x+1-xex-1. The maximum value of function occurs at x=0 and the value of e0.5-1=0.6478.Initially, the normalized coefficient, entropy of each quality characteristic (ej), and the total sum of entropy (E) are calculated. Then the weight of each quality characteristic is calculated as(7)wj=1/p-E1-ej∑j=1p1/p-E1-ej,j=1,…,p.


## 3. Result and Discussion

### 3.1. Plan of Experiments and Analysis of Results

The number of experiments is selected based on the number of factors and its levels. The most influencing factors such as applied load and sliding velocity and wt.% of red mud and counterpart hardness are considered. In this study, the specific wear rate and COF are selected as performance characteristic. As there are four factors and each is at three levels, L27 orthogonal array is chosen for conducting the experiments. The layout as per L27 array and the experimental results are shown in Table1.Table 1
Experimental layout and results.
S. number
Load
Sliding velocity
wt.% of  red mud
Counterpart hardness
Specific wear
COF
(N)
(m/s)
(HRC)
(×10−13 mm3/Nm)
1
10
2
3
58
3.3659
0.489
2
10
2
4
60
6.269
0.365
3
10
2
5
62
8.2369
0.276
4
10
3
3
60
7.9945
0.578
5
10
3
4
62
13.2156
0.385
6
10
3
5
58
15.2389
0.356
7
10
4
3
62
4.269
0.312
8
10
4
4
58
13.567
0.392
9
10
4
5
60
11.289
0.295
10
30
2
3
58
1.239
0.631
11
30
2
4
60
1.56
0.615
12
30
2
5
62
5.5216
0.315
13
30
3
3
60
1.1236
0.685
14
30
3
4
62
15.259
0.4
15
30
3
5
58
10.5698
0.562
16
30
4
3
62
7.369
0.416
17
30
4
4
58
8.369
0.525
18
30
4
5
60
5.239
0.386
19
50
2
3
58
0.1139
0.656
20
50
2
4
60
0.2149
0.6
21
50
2
5
62
10.1157
0.395
22
50
3
3
60
0.9926
0.615
23
50
3
4
62
10.2569
0.462
24
50
3
5
58
13.697
0.401
25
50
4
3
62
3.269
0.425
26
50
4
4
58
11.239
0.385
27
50
4
5
60
5.369
0.351TheS/N ratio, data preprocessing, and the grey relational coefficient for both quality characteristics of each deviation sequence are calculated. Grey relational coefficient is used to evaluate the correlation coefficient matrix and corresponding Eigenvalues. Square of the Eigenvalue matrix represents the contribution of the respective performance characteristics to the principle component. The calculated values of weights for specific wear rate and COF are 0.882 and 0.110, respectively, which is found by entropy method. The calculated weighting values are taken for further analysis, since PCA method has given equal importance to the quality characteristics, whereas entropy method reflects relative importance to the quality characteristics. The obtained weights of each quality characteristic are further used to calculate the grey relational grade. Table 2 shows the performed GRA for the dry sliding wear behavior of the prepared composites.Table 2
Grey relational analysis.
S. number
S
/
N ratio (dB)
Data preprocessing
Grey relational coefficient
Grey relational grade
Order
Specific wear rate
COF
Specific wear rate
COF
Specific wear rate
COF
1
−10.542
6.213823
0.50627
0.62920
0.660332
0.063161
0.723493
20
2
−15.944
8.754143
0.612864
0.30747
0.736494
0.04612
0.782614
15
3
−18.3153
11.18182
0.659657
0
0.775772
0.036667
0.812439
13
4
−18.0558
4.761443
0.654537
0.81315
0.771272
0.080076
0.851348
11
5
−22.4217
8.290785
0.740688
0.36615
0.854708
0.048508
0.903216
5
6
−23.6591
8.971
0.765104
0.28000
0.881742
0.045082
0.926824
2
7
−12.6065
10.11691
0.547008
0.13487
0.687503
0.040289
0.727792
19
8
−22.6497
8.134279
0.745186
0.38597
0.859563
0.049371
0.908934
4
9
−21.0531
10.60356
0.713681
0.07323
0.826674
0.038549
0.865222
9
10
−1.86143
3.999413
0.334979
0.90966
0.566237
0.093168
0.659405
24
11
−3.86249
4.222498
0.374465
0.88141
0.585469
0.088912
0.674381
22
12
−14.8413
10.03379
0.591106
0.14540
0.719553
0.040602
0.760156
18
13
−1.01223
3.286189
0.318222
1
0.558452
0.11
0.668452
23
14
−23.6705
7.9588
0.76533
0.40820
0.882
0.050376
0.932376
1
15
−20.4813
5.005274
0.702399
0.78227
0.815499
0.076631
0.89213
6
16
−17.3482
7.618133
0.640573
0.45134
0.759258
0.052448
0.811706
14
17
−18.4535
5.596814
0.662384
0.70735
0.778191
0.069388
0.847578
12
18
−14.385
8.268254
0.582101
0.36901
0.712768
0.04863
0.761398
16
19
18.86953
3.661923
−0.0741
0.95241
0.422467
0.100441
0.522908
27
20
13.35527
4.436975
0.034713
0.85425
0.453065
0.085172
0.538238
26
21
−20.0999
8.068058
0.694872
0.39436
0.808211
0.049745
0.857956
10
22
0.063815
4.222498
0.296989
0.88141
0.54889
0.088912
0.637802
25
23
−20.2203
6.70716
0.697248
0.56672
0.810497
0.058932
0.86943
8
24
−22.7325
7.937113
0.74682
0.41095
0.861341
0.050503
0.911844
3
25
−10.2883
7.432221
0.501263
0.47489
0.65714
0.053653
0.710793
21
26
−21.0146
8.290785
0.71292
0.36615
0.82591
0.048508
0.874418
7
27
−14.5979
9.093858
0.586302
0.26444
0.715918
0.044514
0.760432
17The main effects of each input process parameter on grey relational grade are shown in Table3. The optimum input parameter level based on maximum average grey relational grade is found as A1 B2 C3 D3, that is, applied load at 10 N, sliding velocity at 3 m/s, 5 wt.% of red mud, and counterpart material hardness at 62 HRC.Table 3
Response table for grey relational grade.
Symbol
Parameters
Average grey relational grade
Max-Min
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
A
Applied load
0.8335
0.7786
0.7426
0.0190
B
Sliding velocity
0.7035
0.8437
0.8075
0.0168
C
wt.% of red mud
0.7015
0.8145
0.8387
0.0373
D
Counterpart material hardness
0.8075
0.7266
0.8206
0.0297The difference between the maximum and minimum value of the grey relational grade during dry sliding wear is reported as follows: 0.0190 for applied load, 0.0168 for sliding velocity, 0.0373 for wt.% of red mud, and 0.0297 for counterpart material hardness. The most effective parameter affecting the multiple performance characteristics is determined by finding the greatest value among the parameters. The result indicates that the wt.% of red mud has the strongest effect on the output response during dry sliding wear test.


### 3.2. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

The results of ANOVA for the grey relational grades are given in Table4. The contribution of each parameter which affects the multiperformance characteristics is wt.% of the red mud (Q=34.9%), sliding velocity (Q=34.5%), counterpart material hardness (Q=16.87%), and applied load (Q=13.6%). Thus, it is found that the dry sliding wear performance is strongly affected by the wt.% of red mud and the sliding velocity. The F-test is also performed to find the physical significance of each input parameter on the output response [12]. It is found that, at 95% of confidence interval, FCalculated>F0.05,2,18=3.55. Hence, all the input process parameters showed significance on affecting the dry sliding wear behavior.Table 4
Result of ANOVA.
Symbol
Degree of freedom
Sum of squares
Mean sum of squares
F-test
Contribution (Q)
A
2
0.037718
0.018859
5.12
13.6
B
2
0.095382
0.047691
12.95
34.5
C
2
0.096554
0.048277
13.11
34.9
D
2
0.046632
0.023317
6.33
16.87
Error
18
0.066303
0.003684
0.13
Total
26
0.342592
100


### 3.3. Confirmation Experiment

Once the optimal levels of the input parameters are selected, the final step is to verify the improvement of the output response. The estimated grey relational gradeτe using the optimal level of input parameters can be calculated as(8)τe=τm+∑i=1pτi-τm,where τm is total mean of grey relational grade, τi is mean of grey relational grade at the optimal level, and p is number of input parameters that significantly affect the multiple performance characteristics. The results of confirmation experiments are shown in Table 5, and it is found that specific wear rate is decreased from 3.365 to 3.065 and COF is decreased from 0.365 to 0.331.Table 5
Confirmation experiment.
Initial parameter
Optimal parameters
Prediction
Experiment
Level
A1 B1 C1 D1
A1 B2 C3 D3
A1 B2 C3 D3
Specific wear rate
3.365
2.983
3.065
COF
0.365
0.325
0.331


### 3.4. Surface Morphology

The worn surface of the composite with 3 wt.% of red mud is shown in Figure3(a). Severe abrasion is predominant with wear debris particles scattered on the mating surface. The wear tracks are still visible with some minute flaw. The minimum applied load and sliding velocity avoided the surface from adhesion and plastic deformation. Figure 3(b) shows the formation of micro cut and grooves on the composite with 4 wt.% of red mud. The formation of lay is also visible throughout the surface. However, mild abrasion is evident when the red mud wt.% is further increased (Figure 3(c)). The red mud particles resisted the wear by increasing the interfacial bond with the matrix. Thus, fewer defects are noticed on the surface of the composite with 5 wt.% red mud even at higher load and sliding velocity conditions.Figure 3
Worn surface: (a) A1 B2 C1 D1, (b) A1 B2 C2 D2, and (c) A1 B2 C3 D3.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.1. Plan of Experiments and Analysis of Results

The number of experiments is selected based on the number of factors and its levels. The most influencing factors such as applied load and sliding velocity and wt.% of red mud and counterpart hardness are considered. In this study, the specific wear rate and COF are selected as performance characteristic. As there are four factors and each is at three levels, L27 orthogonal array is chosen for conducting the experiments. The layout as per L27 array and the experimental results are shown in Table1.Table 1
Experimental layout and results.
S. number
Load
Sliding velocity
wt.% of  red mud
Counterpart hardness
Specific wear
COF
(N)
(m/s)
(HRC)
(×10−13 mm3/Nm)
1
10
2
3
58
3.3659
0.489
2
10
2
4
60
6.269
0.365
3
10
2
5
62
8.2369
0.276
4
10
3
3
60
7.9945
0.578
5
10
3
4
62
13.2156
0.385
6
10
3
5
58
15.2389
0.356
7
10
4
3
62
4.269
0.312
8
10
4
4
58
13.567
0.392
9
10
4
5
60
11.289
0.295
10
30
2
3
58
1.239
0.631
11
30
2
4
60
1.56
0.615
12
30
2
5
62
5.5216
0.315
13
30
3
3
60
1.1236
0.685
14
30
3
4
62
15.259
0.4
15
30
3
5
58
10.5698
0.562
16
30
4
3
62
7.369
0.416
17
30
4
4
58
8.369
0.525
18
30
4
5
60
5.239
0.386
19
50
2
3
58
0.1139
0.656
20
50
2
4
60
0.2149
0.6
21
50
2
5
62
10.1157
0.395
22
50
3
3
60
0.9926
0.615
23
50
3
4
62
10.2569
0.462
24
50
3
5
58
13.697
0.401
25
50
4
3
62
3.269
0.425
26
50
4
4
58
11.239
0.385
27
50
4
5
60
5.369
0.351TheS/N ratio, data preprocessing, and the grey relational coefficient for both quality characteristics of each deviation sequence are calculated. Grey relational coefficient is used to evaluate the correlation coefficient matrix and corresponding Eigenvalues. Square of the Eigenvalue matrix represents the contribution of the respective performance characteristics to the principle component. The calculated values of weights for specific wear rate and COF are 0.882 and 0.110, respectively, which is found by entropy method. The calculated weighting values are taken for further analysis, since PCA method has given equal importance to the quality characteristics, whereas entropy method reflects relative importance to the quality characteristics. The obtained weights of each quality characteristic are further used to calculate the grey relational grade. Table 2 shows the performed GRA for the dry sliding wear behavior of the prepared composites.Table 2
Grey relational analysis.
S. number
S
/
N ratio (dB)
Data preprocessing
Grey relational coefficient
Grey relational grade
Order
Specific wear rate
COF
Specific wear rate
COF
Specific wear rate
COF
1
−10.542
6.213823
0.50627
0.62920
0.660332
0.063161
0.723493
20
2
−15.944
8.754143
0.612864
0.30747
0.736494
0.04612
0.782614
15
3
−18.3153
11.18182
0.659657
0
0.775772
0.036667
0.812439
13
4
−18.0558
4.761443
0.654537
0.81315
0.771272
0.080076
0.851348
11
5
−22.4217
8.290785
0.740688
0.36615
0.854708
0.048508
0.903216
5
6
−23.6591
8.971
0.765104
0.28000
0.881742
0.045082
0.926824
2
7
−12.6065
10.11691
0.547008
0.13487
0.687503
0.040289
0.727792
19
8
−22.6497
8.134279
0.745186
0.38597
0.859563
0.049371
0.908934
4
9
−21.0531
10.60356
0.713681
0.07323
0.826674
0.038549
0.865222
9
10
−1.86143
3.999413
0.334979
0.90966
0.566237
0.093168
0.659405
24
11
−3.86249
4.222498
0.374465
0.88141
0.585469
0.088912
0.674381
22
12
−14.8413
10.03379
0.591106
0.14540
0.719553
0.040602
0.760156
18
13
−1.01223
3.286189
0.318222
1
0.558452
0.11
0.668452
23
14
−23.6705
7.9588
0.76533
0.40820
0.882
0.050376
0.932376
1
15
−20.4813
5.005274
0.702399
0.78227
0.815499
0.076631
0.89213
6
16
−17.3482
7.618133
0.640573
0.45134
0.759258
0.052448
0.811706
14
17
−18.4535
5.596814
0.662384
0.70735
0.778191
0.069388
0.847578
12
18
−14.385
8.268254
0.582101
0.36901
0.712768
0.04863
0.761398
16
19
18.86953
3.661923
−0.0741
0.95241
0.422467
0.100441
0.522908
27
20
13.35527
4.436975
0.034713
0.85425
0.453065
0.085172
0.538238
26
21
−20.0999
8.068058
0.694872
0.39436
0.808211
0.049745
0.857956
10
22
0.063815
4.222498
0.296989
0.88141
0.54889
0.088912
0.637802
25
23
−20.2203
6.70716
0.697248
0.56672
0.810497
0.058932
0.86943
8
24
−22.7325
7.937113
0.74682
0.41095
0.861341
0.050503
0.911844
3
25
−10.2883
7.432221
0.501263
0.47489
0.65714
0.053653
0.710793
21
26
−21.0146
8.290785
0.71292
0.36615
0.82591
0.048508
0.874418
7
27
−14.5979
9.093858
0.586302
0.26444
0.715918
0.044514
0.760432
17The main effects of each input process parameter on grey relational grade are shown in Table3. The optimum input parameter level based on maximum average grey relational grade is found as A1 B2 C3 D3, that is, applied load at 10 N, sliding velocity at 3 m/s, 5 wt.% of red mud, and counterpart material hardness at 62 HRC.Table 3
Response table for grey relational grade.
Symbol
Parameters
Average grey relational grade
Max-Min
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
A
Applied load
0.8335
0.7786
0.7426
0.0190
B
Sliding velocity
0.7035
0.8437
0.8075
0.0168
C
wt.% of red mud
0.7015
0.8145
0.8387
0.0373
D
Counterpart material hardness
0.8075
0.7266
0.8206
0.0297The difference between the maximum and minimum value of the grey relational grade during dry sliding wear is reported as follows: 0.0190 for applied load, 0.0168 for sliding velocity, 0.0373 for wt.% of red mud, and 0.0297 for counterpart material hardness. The most effective parameter affecting the multiple performance characteristics is determined by finding the greatest value among the parameters. The result indicates that the wt.% of red mud has the strongest effect on the output response during dry sliding wear test.


## 3.2. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

The results of ANOVA for the grey relational grades are given in Table4. The contribution of each parameter which affects the multiperformance characteristics is wt.% of the red mud (Q=34.9%), sliding velocity (Q=34.5%), counterpart material hardness (Q=16.87%), and applied load (Q=13.6%). Thus, it is found that the dry sliding wear performance is strongly affected by the wt.% of red mud and the sliding velocity. The F-test is also performed to find the physical significance of each input parameter on the output response [12]. It is found that, at 95% of confidence interval, FCalculated>F0.05,2,18=3.55. Hence, all the input process parameters showed significance on affecting the dry sliding wear behavior.Table 4
Result of ANOVA.
Symbol
Degree of freedom
Sum of squares
Mean sum of squares
F-test
Contribution (Q)
A
2
0.037718
0.018859
5.12
13.6
B
2
0.095382
0.047691
12.95
34.5
C
2
0.096554
0.048277
13.11
34.9
D
2
0.046632
0.023317
6.33
16.87
Error
18
0.066303
0.003684
0.13
Total
26
0.342592
100


## 3.3. Confirmation Experiment

Once the optimal levels of the input parameters are selected, the final step is to verify the improvement of the output response. The estimated grey relational gradeτe using the optimal level of input parameters can be calculated as(8)τe=τm+∑i=1pτi-τm,where τm is total mean of grey relational grade, τi is mean of grey relational grade at the optimal level, and p is number of input parameters that significantly affect the multiple performance characteristics. The results of confirmation experiments are shown in Table 5, and it is found that specific wear rate is decreased from 3.365 to 3.065 and COF is decreased from 0.365 to 0.331.Table 5
Confirmation experiment.
Initial parameter
Optimal parameters
Prediction
Experiment
Level
A1 B1 C1 D1
A1 B2 C3 D3
A1 B2 C3 D3
Specific wear rate
3.365
2.983
3.065
COF
0.365
0.325
0.331


## 3.4. Surface Morphology

The worn surface of the composite with 3 wt.% of red mud is shown in Figure3(a). Severe abrasion is predominant with wear debris particles scattered on the mating surface. The wear tracks are still visible with some minute flaw. The minimum applied load and sliding velocity avoided the surface from adhesion and plastic deformation. Figure 3(b) shows the formation of micro cut and grooves on the composite with 4 wt.% of red mud. The formation of lay is also visible throughout the surface. However, mild abrasion is evident when the red mud wt.% is further increased (Figure 3(c)). The red mud particles resisted the wear by increasing the interfacial bond with the matrix. Thus, fewer defects are noticed on the surface of the composite with 5 wt.% red mud even at higher load and sliding velocity conditions.Figure 3
Worn surface: (a) A1 B2 C1 D1, (b) A1 B2 C2 D2, and (c) A1 B2 C3 D3.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 4. Conclusions

The grey based entropy method is used to optimize the multiresponse characteristic of dry sliding wear behavior of red mud reinforced aluminum MMCs and the following observations are made:(i)
The composite is successfully prepared through the powder metallurgy technique and the dispersion of the red mud particles in the matrix is ensured with the SEM image.(ii)
The optimum levels of input parameters are found by GRA as applied load at 10 N, sliding velocity at 3 m/s, 5 wt.% of red mud, and counterpart material hardness at 62 HRC.(iii)
The results of ANOVA show that the wt.% of the red mud particles in the composite and the sliding velocity contributed more to affecting the wear behavior.(iv)
The higher wt.% of red mud increases the wear resistance property of the composite.(v)
The morphological changes on the worn surface of the samples are examined through SEM. For all the trials it is observed that, mild-to-severe wear exists but the seizure condition was not noticed.



---

*Source: 9082593-2016-01-26.xml*