# Eco-Friendly Detoxification of Congo Red Dye from Water by Citric Acid Activated Bioadsorbents Consisting of Watermelon and Water Chestnuts Peels Collected from Indigenous Resources

Authors: Muhammad Sadiq Hussain; Rabia Rehman; Muhammad Imran; Amara Dar; Mehwish Akram; Eman A. Al-Abbad
Journal: Adsorption Science & Technology
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

The native peels of two cheap, locally available adsorbents, watermelon (PWM) and water chestnuts (PWC), were chemically processed with different chemicals as modifying agents for the determination and assessment of their adsorption ability for the removal and clearance of harmful, venomous, and pernicious Congo red (CGR), as an acidic nature anionic dye, from the aqueous system. In successive batch experiments, the citric acid-treated peels CPWM and CPWC have shown more promising adsorption performance than their raw and untreated peel counterparts due to the availability of additional adsorption active binding sites evidenced through FT-IR and SEM characterizations. In the Langmuir and Temkin models, the correlation coefficients (R2) for the adsorptive removal of CGR on CPWM, PWM, CPWC, and PWC are very close to unity, 0.99 for each case of adsorption performance. Furthermore, the qmax nonlinear statistical results for the elimination of CGR on citric acid-treated adsorbents (CPWM and CPWC) are 8.3 and 7.95 mg/g whereas for their unmodified forms (PWM and PWC) are 2.23 and 4.32 mg/g, respectively, reflecting homogenous and monolayer adsorption mechanism. The greater values of BT 1.4 and 1.3 J/mole, for adsorptive removal of dye on CPWM and CPWC, respectively, as compared to their unmodified forms PWM and PWC which are 0.53 and 0.55 J/mole, respectively, indicate the stronger adsorbate-adsorbent associations. The mechanism follows the pseudo second order in the better mode, while thermodynamic statics for ΔH0,ΔG0, ΔS0, and ΔE0, indicate spontaneous and exothermic behavior of adsorption. This study tends to suggest that citric acid-modified adsorbents CPWM and CPWC may indeed be exploited efficiently to eliminate Congo red dye from wastewater.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Water, as a universal solvent, is able to dissolve more substances than any other liquid on earth and is unsafe and solely vulnerable to pollution. Toxic substances from agriculture, the domestic sector, and factories readily dissolve into and mix with it, which makes it more difficult for people to access safe drinking water and increases the risks of waterborne diseases. In Pakistan, gastrointestinal illness accounts for 45 percent of newborn mortality, whereas overall, 90 percent of infections are due to waterborne diseases [1–3]. The dye industry has expanded dramatically globally in recent years. As per the “Color Rankings” of the USA, commercial dyestuffs have approached tens of thousands. Every year, about 6×107 kg of dyes are released into the environment in the form of effluents, 80% of those are azo dyes. Dyes that are hazardous, mutagenic, malignant, tragic, and disastrous are extensively utilized in a wide range of industries, like fabrics, cosmetics, printing, leather, food manufacturing, paper, and plastics, and huge amounts of water containing dye effluents enter water resources, causing severe water pollution. Drinking water containing dye effluents may cause dysfunction of the liver, kidneys, and brain. According to reported data, many workers in the Indian dye industry suffer from skin and lung diseases as a result of drinking dye contaminated water [4]. Aromatic and other organic dyestuffs are one of the most widespread contaminants found in wastewaters from fabric and other anthropogenic sectors. Due to the dyes’ harmful effects and exposure in surface water, their removal has received a lot of attention across the world [5]. Dye structures are complex and varied, and according to the third edition of the dye ranking, there are around 5×103 distinct kinds of dyes, with over 1,500 of them documented. According to estimates, China has synthesized about 5×102 distinct types of dyes [6]. Textile industry wastewater is a major source of persistent organic dye pollution in the aquatic environment and is quite complicated in terms of product diversity, methods, techniques, and raw resources. Various procedures and chemical techniques, including bleaching, coloring, imprinting, and finishing, have been applied to the fabric during manufacture [7]. In the textile industry, a wide range of dyes, chemicals, and dye intermediates are used to impart desired properties on fabrics. Therefore, the effluents generated by their wastewater, untreated or partially treated, pose a severe and alarming threat to aquatic life as well as mankind. Various treatment strategies have been adopted in this regard, but they are very complex and complicated to manage, and they consume a lot of expensive chemicals, which raises the operational costs. These include the electrochemical oxidation, solar photo Fenton process, reverse osmosis, membrane, and nanofiltration [8, 9]. Another problem related to these method is continous sludge production [10]. Therefore, it is necessary to formulate a revolutionary and innovative treatment approach that is effective for this sort of contaminated water in terms of fulfilling increasingly stringent discharge limits while still meeting the criteria of total dye removal from aqueous solutions. Hence, adsorption on agrowastes is a premier process of eliminating toxins, noxious, and malignant colorants and auxiliaries from wastewater [11, 12]. Its advantages over other techniques are that it is eco-friendly and easily handled, and raw agrowastes are easily and abundantly available everywhere locally. To enhance the effective adsorption ability, the agrowaste biomass is chemically treated with different chemical modifying agents, and the most suitable and appropriate one was selected for bulk amendments of surfaces of adsorbents [13, 14]. Two agrowaste peels of watermelon and water chestnuts were selected after deep study and literature review of previous reported adsorbents. The performance and efficiency of chemically treated adsorbents are checked and tested by the removal of anionic, toxic, carcinogenic, and hazardous Congo red as model acid dye, and the statistical results are analyzed by comparing them with previously reported data listed in Table 1.Table 1
A comparison of the adsorption capacity of adsorbents with previous reported research work.
Adsorbents utilizedAdsorption capacity (mg/g)ReferencesPinus roxburghii sawdust5.8[88]Solanum tuberosum peels6.9[89]Euroamerican poplar biomass8.0[90]Activated carbon from palm tree fiber9.79[91]Carbon from waterhyacinth leaf13.9[92]Kaolinite5.0[93]Liagora farinose7.0[93]Kaolinite modified by Liagora farinose macroalgae10[93]Roots of Eichhornia crassipes1.58[94]Citric acid-activated peels of watermelon (CPWM)8.3This investigationCitric acid-activated peels of water chestnuts (CPWC)7.95This investigationUnactivated raw peels of watermelon (PWM)2.23This investigationUnactivated raw peels of water chestnuts (PWC)4.32This investigation


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Chemicals and Equipment

The chemicals utilized in this investigation include organic compounds such as Congo red dye (λmax=498nm), tartaric acid, lactic acid, citric acid, EDTA, urea, thiourea, methyl orange, phenolphthalein, methyl and ethyl alcohols, 2-propanol, and propanone. The other substances used are caustic soda, soda ash, sodium bicarbonate, sodium chloride, potassium chloride, potassium iodide, and solid iodine, whereas hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, and nitric acid were also used to provide acidic media. Pyrex glassware was used for the experiments conducted. Erlenmeyer flasks (100 mL and 500 mL), measuring flasks (100 mL, 500 mL, and 1000 mL), funnels, china dishes, pipette, burette, and beakers were included (100 mL, 200 mL, 500 mL, and 1000 mL). The equipment was washed with an H2CrO4/H2O solution and sterilized in an electric oven at 70°C for half an hour before use.


### 2.2. Preparation and Characterizations of Adsorbents

Both selected adsorbent peels of watermelon and water chestnuts were obtained locally and dried in sunlight for ten days. After that, they were ground by an electrical grinder and sieved to 70 mesh, washed with distilled water to remove entrapped dust particles as impurities, and dried in an electrical oven at 80°C for 72 hours [15–17]. These prepared peels of adsorbents were labeled “PWM” for peels of watermelon and “PWC” for peels of water chestnuts. These were stored in bulk in polythene bags for further use in experimental work. These are also characterized and evaluated by performing Boehm titration to find the adsorbent sites’ behavior (acidic or basic) [18], I2 titration, moisture and ash content, elemental analysis, volatile matters, measurements of porosity and bulk density ratio, and pH of their raw forms [19–21] and are tabulated in Table 2. To measure the pH, 1 g of each PWM and PWC was placed in 40 mL of deionized water in 200-mL flasks separately and stirred for one hour continuously. The pH was measured by using pH meter after stabilization of sample mixtures [22]. Acid-base titrations have been performed to calculate the net surface charge of adsorbent materials using the point of zero charge (pHpzc). To determine the point of zero charge, 0.8 g of each PWM and PWC was separately added to 200 mL of 25 ppm sodium chloride solution in two sets of ten Erlenmeyer flasks labeled pH (1 to 10). The initial pH of each solution was adjusted by using NaOH and HCl solutions by using a pH meter. After 10 hours, the final pH of each sample was measured at 30C. Afterward, the difference in change in pH between the initial and final was determined to measure the point of zero charge graphically. If pH (adsorbent) > pHpzc, then, the adsorbent surface is even more negatively charged, and the basic dye cations are more preferentially coupled to negatively charged adsorbent interfaces and vice versa [23, 24].Table 2
Physicochemical characterizations of raw adsorbents.
Parameters assessmentPWMPWCpH5.95.5Porosity (%)0.190.09Moisture contents (%)8.367.72Ash contents (%)3.331.92Bulk density (g cm-3)1.240.48Particle density (g cm-3)0.490.6Volatile organic components (%)17.825.6Iodine number (mg. g-1)1315Carboxylic acids (milli moles)1.91.4Surface basic sites (milli moles)0.980.51To determine thebulk density of PWM and PWC, a density bottle with a lid was weighed (Wi), then filled with distilled water, and weighed again (Wf). By subtracting the (Wi) from the (Wf), the mass of water was calculated. The volume of a density bottle was calculated from Equation (1), where d is the density of water and W is the mass of water. Then, a specific amount of each sample was taken in a density bottle and reweighed to measure the volume of the sample. By using Equation (2), the bulk density of both PWM and PWC was determined [25].
(1)V=dxW,(2)BulkdensityofPWMandPWC=MassofwetsamplepeelsVolumeofsamplepeels,where Vs is the volume of sample adsorbent and dw is the density of water, whereas the porosity of each adsorbent sample was determined using the following equation:
(3)Porosity=VolumeofvoidsVvTotalvolumeofcylinderVt,where the void volume was calculated by the difference between total volume of cylinder for dry density and volume of the each sample adsorbent from Equation (3).For the determination of porosity, appropriate quantities of each sample PWM and PWC were weighed (Gs), then dried in oven for 3 hours at 100°C to remove the entrapped moisture, and reweighed and labeled as (Ms). The volumes and porosity of each adsorbent were calculated by as follows [26, 27]:
(4)Vscm3=MsGsdw,Porosity=VolumeofvoidsVvTotalvolumeofcylinderVt,where Vs is the volume of each sample PWM and PWC and dw is density of water. The void volume was determined by the difference between total volume of cylinder for dry density and volume of the each sample adsorbent from the following equation:
(5)VolumeofVoidVv,cm3=Vt−Vs.To determine theash contents 1 gram of each PWM and PWC was placed in crucible and ignited at 500°C for three hours and then cooled and reweighed. The following equations were used to determine the percentage ash content [28, 29] and the volatile organic components, respectively [30].
(6)Ashcontentpercent=WeightofashgWeightofsampleg×100,Volatileorganiccontents%=W2g−W1gW2g×100,where W1 is the ash weight and W2 is the dry weight of each adsorbent.To determine theiodine number of PWM and PWC, 1.35 g of iodine crystals and 2.05 g of potassium iodide were dissolved to prepare a stock solution. 0.5 g of each adsorbent, PWM and PWC, was placed in 10 mL of HCl with conc. 5%V/V in two separate Erlenmeyer flasks and stirred for 60 minutes along with the addition of iodine solution and filtered. Afterward, 10 mL of each filtrate was titrated by using 0.1 M Na2S2O3 as a standard solution, and the following equation was used to calculate the adsorbed iodine by each sample, PWM, and PWC:
(7)Iodinenumbermg.g−1=B−SB×V.MW×253.81,where the molar mass of I2 is 253.81 gmol-1, W is the mass of adsorbent, and B is the volume of iodine solution without adsorbent sample, while S is the sample solution. V and M are volumes of filtrate and molar volume of I2 solution, respectively [31, 32].Boehm titration was conducted to determine the various types of functional groups on the interfaces of both adsorbents. 0.4 gram of each PWM and PWC was placed separately in 30 mL solutions of 0.1 M HCl, 0.1 M sodium hydroxide, 0.1 M sodium carbonate, and 0.1 M sodium hydrogen carbonate, respectively, and each sample was sealed with aluminum foil and placed at 30°C for 10 hours and then filtered. For filtrates containing excess unconsumed washing soda, baking soda, or caustic soda, 10 mL of each filtrate was titrated against a standard solution of 0.1 M HCl to determine the number of carboxylic, phenolic, and lactone groups, and 0.1 M NaOH to assess the number of basic groups such as –NH2 groups on each PWM and PWC [33, 34].Therefore, the adsorption of anionic dye molecules like Congo red dye (CGR-) is highly dependent upon the pH of the solution due to the protonation and deprotonation of COOH moieties on the interfaces of adsorbents [35, 36]. The chemical structure of Congo red dye is depicted in Figure 1 [37].Figure 1
Chemical structure of Congo red dye.


### 2.3. Optimization of Adsorbent Performance by Processing with Various Modifying Agents

The adsorbents’ performance and efficiency were tested by using different chemicals, as depicted in Section2.1. For this purpose, the solid phase modification is carried out by using an adsorbent/chemical ratio of 9 : 1 and is elaborated schematically below in Figure 2(a) [38].Figure 2
(a) Chemical modification scheme of adsorbents. (b) Illustration of chemically treated adsorbent.
(a)(b)The soaking of each adsorbent (50 g) in various organic solvents (200 mL) for 24 hours at room temperature was also conducted, as well as solutions of alkali and inorganic acids, which were also utilized for the chemical processing of PWM and PWC. Thus, chemically modified PWM and PWC were prepared and tested for their adsorption performance by maintaining the optimized operational conditions for CGR as the model dye in this research approach [39]. The most suitable optimized modifying agent for chemical modification of PWM and PWC was selected by performing repeated adsorption experiments. The chemically treated adsorbents were washed with distilled and deionized water to remove entrapped unreactive modifying agent and dried at 80°C in an electrical oven for twenty-four hours and sealed in plastic jars for further adsorption experimental study. The modified adsorbents were characterized by FT-IR and SEM to find the amendments to their surface morphology. Tricarboxylic organic acid-treated adsorbents have shown the highest adsorption of CGR from aqueous solution. Their schematic illustration and the evaluation after chemical treatment with citric acid are shown in Figure 2(b) [40].


### 2.4. Batch Experimentation on the Adsorption Mechanism

To investigate adsorption mechanism and for optimizing operational parameters, CGR removal with raw PWM and PWC was monitored. Chemically treated watermelon peels (CPWM) and water chestnut peels (CPWC) were used. Experiments on each operational parameter were carried out in four sets of Erlenmeyer flasks, with each set containing 10 to 12 flasks depending on the requirement. All the experiments were highly specific and dependent on operational conditions: adsorbent dose in ten equal divisions was utilized from 0.2 to 2.0 g, time of contact was examined from 5 to 60 minutes, with a gap of five minutes), temperature exploration in eight equal intervals between (10–80°C), impact of the initial as well as final pH between 1–10 and concentration of CGR solution, and speed of agitation (25–250 rpm) with ten equal intervals. Isothermal and kinetic modeling experiments are also performed by considering the optimized operational conditions, and the results are compared with the previous reported investigations listed in Table1 on the adsorption of Congo red dye on different adsorbents from the aqueous environment. For further evaluation and interpretation of the validity of equilibrium data and performance of adsorption, the thermodynamic parameters like variation in enthalpy, entropy, energy of activation, and Gibbs free energy of each adsorption experiment were determined.


## 2.1. Chemicals and Equipment

The chemicals utilized in this investigation include organic compounds such as Congo red dye (λmax=498nm), tartaric acid, lactic acid, citric acid, EDTA, urea, thiourea, methyl orange, phenolphthalein, methyl and ethyl alcohols, 2-propanol, and propanone. The other substances used are caustic soda, soda ash, sodium bicarbonate, sodium chloride, potassium chloride, potassium iodide, and solid iodine, whereas hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, and nitric acid were also used to provide acidic media. Pyrex glassware was used for the experiments conducted. Erlenmeyer flasks (100 mL and 500 mL), measuring flasks (100 mL, 500 mL, and 1000 mL), funnels, china dishes, pipette, burette, and beakers were included (100 mL, 200 mL, 500 mL, and 1000 mL). The equipment was washed with an H2CrO4/H2O solution and sterilized in an electric oven at 70°C for half an hour before use.


## 2.2. Preparation and Characterizations of Adsorbents

Both selected adsorbent peels of watermelon and water chestnuts were obtained locally and dried in sunlight for ten days. After that, they were ground by an electrical grinder and sieved to 70 mesh, washed with distilled water to remove entrapped dust particles as impurities, and dried in an electrical oven at 80°C for 72 hours [15–17]. These prepared peels of adsorbents were labeled “PWM” for peels of watermelon and “PWC” for peels of water chestnuts. These were stored in bulk in polythene bags for further use in experimental work. These are also characterized and evaluated by performing Boehm titration to find the adsorbent sites’ behavior (acidic or basic) [18], I2 titration, moisture and ash content, elemental analysis, volatile matters, measurements of porosity and bulk density ratio, and pH of their raw forms [19–21] and are tabulated in Table 2. To measure the pH, 1 g of each PWM and PWC was placed in 40 mL of deionized water in 200-mL flasks separately and stirred for one hour continuously. The pH was measured by using pH meter after stabilization of sample mixtures [22]. Acid-base titrations have been performed to calculate the net surface charge of adsorbent materials using the point of zero charge (pHpzc). To determine the point of zero charge, 0.8 g of each PWM and PWC was separately added to 200 mL of 25 ppm sodium chloride solution in two sets of ten Erlenmeyer flasks labeled pH (1 to 10). The initial pH of each solution was adjusted by using NaOH and HCl solutions by using a pH meter. After 10 hours, the final pH of each sample was measured at 30C. Afterward, the difference in change in pH between the initial and final was determined to measure the point of zero charge graphically. If pH (adsorbent) > pHpzc, then, the adsorbent surface is even more negatively charged, and the basic dye cations are more preferentially coupled to negatively charged adsorbent interfaces and vice versa [23, 24].Table 2
Physicochemical characterizations of raw adsorbents.
Parameters assessmentPWMPWCpH5.95.5Porosity (%)0.190.09Moisture contents (%)8.367.72Ash contents (%)3.331.92Bulk density (g cm-3)1.240.48Particle density (g cm-3)0.490.6Volatile organic components (%)17.825.6Iodine number (mg. g-1)1315Carboxylic acids (milli moles)1.91.4Surface basic sites (milli moles)0.980.51To determine thebulk density of PWM and PWC, a density bottle with a lid was weighed (Wi), then filled with distilled water, and weighed again (Wf). By subtracting the (Wi) from the (Wf), the mass of water was calculated. The volume of a density bottle was calculated from Equation (1), where d is the density of water and W is the mass of water. Then, a specific amount of each sample was taken in a density bottle and reweighed to measure the volume of the sample. By using Equation (2), the bulk density of both PWM and PWC was determined [25].
(1)V=dxW,(2)BulkdensityofPWMandPWC=MassofwetsamplepeelsVolumeofsamplepeels,where Vs is the volume of sample adsorbent and dw is the density of water, whereas the porosity of each adsorbent sample was determined using the following equation:
(3)Porosity=VolumeofvoidsVvTotalvolumeofcylinderVt,where the void volume was calculated by the difference between total volume of cylinder for dry density and volume of the each sample adsorbent from Equation (3).For the determination of porosity, appropriate quantities of each sample PWM and PWC were weighed (Gs), then dried in oven for 3 hours at 100°C to remove the entrapped moisture, and reweighed and labeled as (Ms). The volumes and porosity of each adsorbent were calculated by as follows [26, 27]:
(4)Vscm3=MsGsdw,Porosity=VolumeofvoidsVvTotalvolumeofcylinderVt,where Vs is the volume of each sample PWM and PWC and dw is density of water. The void volume was determined by the difference between total volume of cylinder for dry density and volume of the each sample adsorbent from the following equation:
(5)VolumeofVoidVv,cm3=Vt−Vs.To determine theash contents 1 gram of each PWM and PWC was placed in crucible and ignited at 500°C for three hours and then cooled and reweighed. The following equations were used to determine the percentage ash content [28, 29] and the volatile organic components, respectively [30].
(6)Ashcontentpercent=WeightofashgWeightofsampleg×100,Volatileorganiccontents%=W2g−W1gW2g×100,where W1 is the ash weight and W2 is the dry weight of each adsorbent.To determine theiodine number of PWM and PWC, 1.35 g of iodine crystals and 2.05 g of potassium iodide were dissolved to prepare a stock solution. 0.5 g of each adsorbent, PWM and PWC, was placed in 10 mL of HCl with conc. 5%V/V in two separate Erlenmeyer flasks and stirred for 60 minutes along with the addition of iodine solution and filtered. Afterward, 10 mL of each filtrate was titrated by using 0.1 M Na2S2O3 as a standard solution, and the following equation was used to calculate the adsorbed iodine by each sample, PWM, and PWC:
(7)Iodinenumbermg.g−1=B−SB×V.MW×253.81,where the molar mass of I2 is 253.81 gmol-1, W is the mass of adsorbent, and B is the volume of iodine solution without adsorbent sample, while S is the sample solution. V and M are volumes of filtrate and molar volume of I2 solution, respectively [31, 32].Boehm titration was conducted to determine the various types of functional groups on the interfaces of both adsorbents. 0.4 gram of each PWM and PWC was placed separately in 30 mL solutions of 0.1 M HCl, 0.1 M sodium hydroxide, 0.1 M sodium carbonate, and 0.1 M sodium hydrogen carbonate, respectively, and each sample was sealed with aluminum foil and placed at 30°C for 10 hours and then filtered. For filtrates containing excess unconsumed washing soda, baking soda, or caustic soda, 10 mL of each filtrate was titrated against a standard solution of 0.1 M HCl to determine the number of carboxylic, phenolic, and lactone groups, and 0.1 M NaOH to assess the number of basic groups such as –NH2 groups on each PWM and PWC [33, 34].Therefore, the adsorption of anionic dye molecules like Congo red dye (CGR-) is highly dependent upon the pH of the solution due to the protonation and deprotonation of COOH moieties on the interfaces of adsorbents [35, 36]. The chemical structure of Congo red dye is depicted in Figure 1 [37].Figure 1
Chemical structure of Congo red dye.


## 2.3. Optimization of Adsorbent Performance by Processing with Various Modifying Agents

The adsorbents’ performance and efficiency were tested by using different chemicals, as depicted in Section2.1. For this purpose, the solid phase modification is carried out by using an adsorbent/chemical ratio of 9 : 1 and is elaborated schematically below in Figure 2(a) [38].Figure 2
(a) Chemical modification scheme of adsorbents. (b) Illustration of chemically treated adsorbent.
(a)(b)The soaking of each adsorbent (50 g) in various organic solvents (200 mL) for 24 hours at room temperature was also conducted, as well as solutions of alkali and inorganic acids, which were also utilized for the chemical processing of PWM and PWC. Thus, chemically modified PWM and PWC were prepared and tested for their adsorption performance by maintaining the optimized operational conditions for CGR as the model dye in this research approach [39]. The most suitable optimized modifying agent for chemical modification of PWM and PWC was selected by performing repeated adsorption experiments. The chemically treated adsorbents were washed with distilled and deionized water to remove entrapped unreactive modifying agent and dried at 80°C in an electrical oven for twenty-four hours and sealed in plastic jars for further adsorption experimental study. The modified adsorbents were characterized by FT-IR and SEM to find the amendments to their surface morphology. Tricarboxylic organic acid-treated adsorbents have shown the highest adsorption of CGR from aqueous solution. Their schematic illustration and the evaluation after chemical treatment with citric acid are shown in Figure 2(b) [40].


## 2.4. Batch Experimentation on the Adsorption Mechanism

To investigate adsorption mechanism and for optimizing operational parameters, CGR removal with raw PWM and PWC was monitored. Chemically treated watermelon peels (CPWM) and water chestnut peels (CPWC) were used. Experiments on each operational parameter were carried out in four sets of Erlenmeyer flasks, with each set containing 10 to 12 flasks depending on the requirement. All the experiments were highly specific and dependent on operational conditions: adsorbent dose in ten equal divisions was utilized from 0.2 to 2.0 g, time of contact was examined from 5 to 60 minutes, with a gap of five minutes), temperature exploration in eight equal intervals between (10–80°C), impact of the initial as well as final pH between 1–10 and concentration of CGR solution, and speed of agitation (25–250 rpm) with ten equal intervals. Isothermal and kinetic modeling experiments are also performed by considering the optimized operational conditions, and the results are compared with the previous reported investigations listed in Table1 on the adsorption of Congo red dye on different adsorbents from the aqueous environment. For further evaluation and interpretation of the validity of equilibrium data and performance of adsorption, the thermodynamic parameters like variation in enthalpy, entropy, energy of activation, and Gibbs free energy of each adsorption experiment were determined.


## 3. Results and Discussions

### 3.1. Assessment of Chemically Modified Adsorbents Using Various Modifying Agents

The performance of both chemically modified (PWM and PWC) adsorbents in terms of adsorption capability is assessed using a variety of modifying agents, as shown graphically in Figure3.Figure 3
Comparative optimization performance of chemically processed adsorbents with different modifying agents.After a series of experiments, it was found that citric acid-treated cellulosic biomass (PWM and PWC) performed better, with the highest CGR adsorption results, and their schematically surface amendment with an increase in COOH through different associations on their surface interfaces is elaborated in Figures2(a) and 2(b). The chemically modified peels of adsorbents (CPWM and CPWC) were prepared as described in Section 2.3 and stored in plastic jars. It was significant to note that throughout the experimentation, chemically modified adsorbents developed quick adsorption equilibrium at low pH (4-6) due to an increase in protonation on the adsorbent-interface, resulting in more electrostatic associations with anionic dye molecules [CGR-] in the aqueous environment.


### 3.2. FTIR Analysis

Results of FTIR analysis for all adsorbents before and after removal of dye are presented in Figures4–6.Figure 4
Comparative FT-IR characterization of native adsorbents ((a) PWM and (b) PWC).Figure 5
Comparative FT-IR characterization of citric acid-treated adsorbents ((c) CPWM and (d) CPWC).Figure 6
Comparative FTIR analysis after adsorption of CGR on chemically modified adsorbents ((e) CGR + PWM, (f) CGR + CPWM, (g) CGR + PWC, and (h) CGR + CPWC)).


#### 3.2.1. FT-IR Screening of Raw Adsorbents

Figures4(a) and 4(b) illustrate the FT-IR spectra of raw and unmodified adsorbents PWM and PWC, respectively. The moieties for alcoholic functional groups (OH) are depicted in Figure 4(a) by the frequencies at 3775–3600 cm-1and 2900 cm-1 [41] and Figure 4(b) by the wavenumbers at 3685–3550 cm-1 and 3870 cm-1, respectively. The wavenumbers at 3300 cm-1 and at 1720 cm-1 in Figure 4(a) and at 3285.5 cm-1 and 1685 cm-1 in Figure 4(b) represent the OH for carboxylic acid groups, respectively. The peaks at 1720 cm-1 and at 1685 cm-1 are the signals for C=O groups for COOH moieties [42] in PWM and PWC, respectively. During the study of literature, it was observed that these groups are responsible for the electrostatic associations of the dye molecules during the adsorption mechanism [43].


#### 3.2.2. FT-IR Assessment of Acid-Modified Adsorbents

Figures5(c) and 5(d) elaborate FT-IR analysis of the citric acid-chelated PWM and PWC adsorbents.The wavenumbers 3860–3720 cm-1 and 3890–3700 cm-1 correspond to the chemical interactions of citric acid molecules with OH groups via chelation on the interfaces of CPWM and CPWC, as indicated in Figures 5(c) and 5(d), respectively, providing additional adsorption active sites to interfere with CGR molecules during the adsorption process. The peaks at 3300 and 3250 cm-1 depicted OH groups for COOH moieties, while at 2915 cm-1 and 2880 cm-1 were signals for the presence OH groups of alcohols in CPWM and CPWC, respectively. The strong peaks at 1705 and 1660 cm-1 evidenced the carbonyl groups of COOH on the interfaces of CPWM and CPWC [44], which might be responsible for dye molecule affiliations due to their polarity, whereas signals at 1350 and 1325 cm-1 indicated OH (bending) for alcohols on the surfaces of CPWM and CPWC, respectively [45, 46].


#### 3.2.3. FT-IR Analysis after Adsorption of CGR on Acid-Modified Adsorbents

Figure6 illustrates the FT-IR evaluation after the adsorption of CGR on chemically treated adsorbents.The frequency range at 3840-3690 cm-1 and 3900-3670 cm-1 represents hydrogen bonds between (>C=O) of carboxylic acid and (>NH2) of CGR, as well as (OH) of tricarboxylic acid and lone pairs on (NH2) of CGR, respectively [47], under the influence of the low initial pH range between 5 and 6, depicted in Figures 6(f) and 6(h) for CPWM and CPWC, respectively, whereas in Figures 6(e) and 6(g) for PWM and PWC, respectively. This has obviously shown good adsorption performance of CPWM and CPWC due to amendment of surface morphology as compared to their raw and unmodified forms. The adsorption performance of CGR was directly linked to the influence of interactions due to the protonation of COOH on the interfaces of each CPWM and CPWC. The intermolecular associations between CGR and -OH of COOH moieties are also depicted at the wavenumbers 2880 and 2820 cm-1 in Figure 6(f) and 2800 and 2700 cm-1 in Figure 6(h), respectively. Peaks at 1680 cm-1 in Figure 6(f) and 1650 cm-1 in Figure 6(h) indicate the possibility of oxime formation between (>C=O) of COOH on adsorbent surfaces and NH2 of CGR molecules from aqueous solution. As a result, the citric acid modification of both adsorbents performed more efficient and faster adsorption processes than their raw and native forms [48, 49].


### 3.3. SEM Analysis

Figure7(a) represents the screening electron micrograph of native, unprocessed PWM. This includes empty spaces, relatively small, imbedded bouts of depression, and thick spiral clusters, while Figure 7(b) demonstrates its citric acid-treated modified form (CPWM), which has been transformed into flannel, flossy, blocky, wavy, and fluffy objects with varying increased numbers of adsorption binding sites for effective and quicker removal of acid dye (CGR) from aqueous solution. Figure 7(c) displays raw PWC with stuffed fibrous forms, holes, and gaps, whereas Figure 7(d) reveals amended arrangements of its citric acid-modified form (CPWC) with random cylindrical, blocky, and cone-like structural arrangements having a larger surface area. This indicates that the surface topography of PWC has indeed been altered. It is also evidenced by FT-IR characterization, resulting in the provision and promotion of additional adsorption binding sites for the adsorptive exclusion of CGR from the water system.Figure 7
SEM comparison of adsorbents before and after chemical modification as well as dye loading ((a) PWM, (b) CPWM, (c) PWC, (d) CPWC, (e) CGR+ CPWM, and (f) CGR + CPWC).
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)Figure7(e) represents the SEM micrograph after the adsorption of CGR on CPWM. It is obviously different morphologically from the CPWM due to its appearance as threadlike, zigzag, highly wavy, fibroid, stringy, and tough, reflecting the good and more percentage adsorption of CGR. Figure 7(f) depicts SEM images of CPWC after CGR adsorption, with a texture resembling thick, coriaceous, tough, cloggy, disk-like, hardened, and manifold, indicating more dye adsorption.


### 3.4. Optimization of Operating Factors

Operational parameters for the assessment of adsorption efficiency of CGR on each PWM, PWC, CPWM, and CPWC were optimized experimentally as under.


#### 3.4.1. Optimization of Biosorbents Dosage

Biosorbent dosage has a significant impact on the efficiency of the adsorption mechanism. The experiments were conducted in four sets of 250-mL Erlenmeyer flasks, and each set included ten flasks containing 25 ppm CGR with a volume of 25 mL.The biosorbent dosage range of 0.2-2 g was studied with a difference of 0.2 g for each PWM, CPWM, PWC, and CPWC at 40°C, initial pH 4, and 125 rpm agitation speed. The maximal adsorptive removal rate of acid dye was established experimentally as follows: 71.4% removal of CGR on 0.8 g of PWM and 95% removal of CGR on 0.8 g of its acid-treated form, CPWM, whereas 75.7% eradication of CGR on 0.8 g of PWC and 95% on 1.0 g of CPWC illustrated in Figure8. The decrease in adsorption performance with an increase in adsorbent dosage is due to the rapid establishment of equilibrium between CGR and at the interfaces of each adsorbent due to the many unoccupied adsorption sites as depicted in Figure 8 [50]. The optimized 0.8 g adsorbent dosage for each adsorption case was selected in this investigation.Figure 8
Optimization of biosorbents dosage.


#### 3.4.2. Optimization of Contact Time Duration

The effectiveness of the adsorption process is equivalent to the number of accessible binding sites on the interfaces of each PWM, CPWM, PWC, and CPWC.Figure9 reveals the determination of 84.3% adsorptive elimination of CGR on PWM at 30 minutes and 95% on its acid modification and CPWM at 25 minutes, whereas 75.7% on PWC at 40 minutes and 97.2% on CPWC at 20 minutes after batch mode experiments. The experiments were conducted by using 25 ppm solutions with a volume of 25 mL on 0.8 g of each adsorbent at 40°C, 125 rpm, and an initial pH of 4. Adsorption declines with time by the unit mass of each adsorbent after a specific frequency owing to equilibrium, leaving numerous empty adsorption binding sites unoccupied [51], as shown in Figure 9.Figure 9
Optimization of contact time.


#### 3.4.3. Agitation Rate Optimization

Another important operational parameter that controlled the adsorption rate for the elimination of CGR from water on PWM, CPWM, PWC, and CPWC was the agitation rate (rpm). This factor was investigated at speeds ranging from 25 to 200 rpm, with a 25 rpm variation at 40°C temperature, and an initial pH of 4 on 0.8 g of each adsorbent dosage.Figure10 displays the biosorption removal of CGR as follows: 73.5% on PWM at 125 rpm and 97.2% on its citric acid-modified form CPWM at 125 rpm, whereas 75.7% on native PWC at 125 rpm and 92.9% on its amended formulation at CPWC at 125 rpm, indicating the effective adsorption performance of chemically treated adsorbents as compared to their untreated forms. During the experiments, it was found that fast agitation speeds generated a thin layer of CGR molecules from the bulk on the surface interface of each adsorbent, which directly decreased the adsorption performance and increased the desorption of CGR [32]. The decrease in percentage adsorption of CGR at high agitation speeds of 125 rpm on CPWM and CPWC and 150 rpm on unmodified adsorbents PWM and PWC is also due to the fast and increased number of collisions of dye molecules on the adsorbent surfaces. The resulting repulsive forces become more operative and significant between free anionic [CGR-] molecules in an aqueous system and adsorbed CGR molecules on the interfaces of adsorbents [52]. Furthermore, the negatively charged binding sites on the surfaces of adsorbents also repelled the anionic dye molecules during the high agitation rate. Thus, increased agitation rates quantitatively increase desorption of CGR from the interfaces of adsorbents under the influence of the ion exchange mechanism [33]. Therefore, an optimized agitation rate of 125 rpm is determined after repeated experiments for further investigation, as depicted in Figure 10.Figure 10
Optimization of agitation rate.


#### 3.4.4. Optimization of Temperature for Adsorption Mechanism

Kinetic energy is directly linked with the variation of temperature of the CGR solution and ultimately influences the thermodynamic parameters, resulting in adsorption performance of biosorbents. The biosorption performance was investigated for a temperature range of 10–80°C with a difference of 10°C for 25 ppm CGR solution with a volume of 25 mL on 0.8 g of each biosorbent at 125 rpm and at initial pH 5. A temperature-controlled water bath was employed to keep the temperature stable during the experiment. This experiment was carried out to better understand the physical changes that occur on adsorbents when temperatures rise. To prevent evaporation, the experimental flasks were sealed with Al-foil. The experiment was carried out to better understand the physical changes that occur on adsorbents when temperatures rise.Figure11 graphically represents the biosorption results, which are as follows: PWM eliminated 75.7% of CGR at 40°C, and its acid-modified form, CPWM, eliminated 95% of CGR at 30°C, whereas PWC and its acid modification, CPWC, eliminated 80 and 92.9% of CGR, respectively, at 40°C. The adsorption performance decreases after 40°C in each of the cases which can be analyzed in Figure 11. This might be due to devastation, decimation, and disintegration of the structure lignocellulosic biomass of each adsorbent [53]. This behavior can be analyzed for PWM at 60°C which has been shown to have an 80% eradication of CGR, and for PWC, which has shown a decrease in adsorption at 40 to 50°C from 80% to 73.5%, with an afterward increase in adsorption to 80% again at 50 to 60°C. As a result, a temperature of 40°C was determined to be optimal for future adsorption experiments.Figure 11
Optimization the effect of temperature.


#### 3.4.5. Optimization of pH for Adsorption Performance

The adsorption process is specifically correlated to the initial pH of the dye solution [54]. The biosorption potential was examined for a pH range of 1–10, for a 25 ppm CGR solution with a volume of 25 mL on 0.8 g of each biosorbent at optimal temperature, contacting duration, and agitation speed. 0.1 molar of each NaOH or HCl solution was used to regulate pH during the adsorption experiments. Low pH favored protonation at the interface surfaces of each adsorbent PWM, PWC, CPWM, and CPWC, resulting in anions [CGR-] flowing quickly towards adsorbents, overcoming repulsive forces [55, 56].The amino groups of CGR get chelated with the COOH moieties on the adsorbent surfaces. During batch experiments, it was discovered that at pH 4-6, the adsorption of CGR molecules was quick and promising, but that with a unit one increase in pH 6-10, the results were unfavorable, which could be due to an increase in deprotonation of COOH moieties on adsorbents providing anionic binding sites, resulting in an increase in repulsion against [CGR-] ions in the aqueous system. Figure12 illustrates graphically the maximum adsorption elimination of CGR on PWM 82% at pH = 4, on CPWM 95% at pH = 4, on PWC 75.7% at pH 4, and on CPWC 93% at pH 4. As a result, the optimal pH value 4 was chosen for future investigations.Figure 12
The impact of initial pH on adsorption performance.


### 3.5. Adsorption Isothermal and Kinetics Investigations

The adsorption of CGR on modified and unmodified adsorbents was investigated by applying Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin as well as kinetics models of equilibrium under optimized operational conditions as follows: adsorbent dosage of 0.8 g, initial pH of 4, and 25 ppm CGR solutions with a volume of 100 mL at 40°C and 125 rpm shaking speed.


#### 3.5.1. Interpretation of the Langmuir Adsorption Model

A nonlinear Langmuir isothermal plot (Qe vs Ce) is expressed in Figure 13. The following equation represents nonlinear form of the Langmuir model [57, 58], while significant Langmuir parameters are tabulated in Table 3.
(8)qe=b.Ce.qmax1+b.Cenonlinear,(9)qe=Co−CeVm,(10)R%=Co−CeCo×100.Figure 13
Nonlinear Langmuir isothermal investigation.Table 3
A comparative nonlinear isothermal studies for the adsorptive removal of CGR.
Parameters for nonlinear isothermsCGR on CPWMCGR on PWMCGR on CPWCCGR on PWCLangmuir isothermR20.990.990.990.98qmax (mg. g-1)8.32.237.954.32b (L.mg-1)0.420.270.530.24Standard deviations1.0030.4601.0110.765ΔG° (kJmol-1)-2.2-3.2-1.6-3.5RMSE0.02770.00670.11890.0480Freundlich isothermR20.990.990.990.99n0.7290.3970.6680.495KF (mg. L-1) × (L.mg-1)1/n2.370.6332.491.03RMSE0.00024.8×10−050.00020.0001Temkin isothermR20.990.990.990.99BT (J/mole) × (mg.g-1)-11.40.531.30.55KT (L.g-1)6.22.28.011.3The adsorption capacity and percentage removal (R%) of CGR are calculated from Equations (9) and (10), respectively, whereqeis the adsorbed quantity of CGR andCeis the quantity of CGR left after adsorption, whileqm(mg.g-1) is the highest adsorption capacity, andbis (L.g-1) for adsorption energy, whereas in equation (9),Vis the volume of adsorbate in dm3, while (m) is related to the mass of each adsorbent used in experimental work [59]. The correlation coefficients (R2) for the adsorption of CGR on CPWM, PWM, CPWC, and PWC are 0.999, 0.998, 0.997, and 0.988, respectively, and are closer to unity, while the maximum adsorption capacities (Qmax) of both citric acid processed adsorbents CPWM and CPWC are 8.3 and 7.95, respectively, as compared to their unmodified forms, PWM and PWC, which are 2.23 and 4.32 mg/g, respectively, reflecting the suitability and fitness of this isothermal model for the adsorptive eradication of CGR from aqueous solutions. The qmax of present study is compared with the previous reported data in Table 1. The Langmuir constants “b” (adsorption energy) for acid-treated adsorbents CPWM and CPWC are 0.42 and 0.53, which are sufficiently high as compared to unmodified adsorbents PWM and PWC at 0.27 and 0.24 (L.g-1), respectively. These Langmuir constants “b” are calculated from the nonlinear mode of Langmuir isotherm Equation (8), reflecting the more adsorption energy and comparatively stronger forces between dye molecules and interfaces of citric acid-treated adsorbents due to the availability of additional COOH moieties. The nonlinear regression analysis results of this isotherm tabulated in Table 3 express the suitability and fitness of this model on equilibrium data.These statistics and findings relate to monolayer homogenous adsorption due to a set number of equivalent binding adsorption sites spread on adsorbents surfaces. The standard deviations for PWM, CPWM, PWC, and CPWC are 0.46, 1.003, 0.765, and 1.011, respectively, and are expressed in Figure14.Figure 14
Study of standard deviations.


#### 3.5.2. Interpretation of the Freundlich Isotherm

The nonlinear form of Freundlich isotherm is shown in Equation (11) and is graphically represented in Figure 15. This isothermal model correlates with the surface heterogeneity and potency of biomass towards adsorption of CGR from aqueous solutions [60, 61].
(11)qe=KFCe1/n,where Freundlich adsorption constants KF (mg. L-1) × (L.mg-1)1/n are associated with adsorption capacity and n with adsorption intensity. The significant calculated parameters of this isotherm are tabulated in Table 3. The correlation coefficients (R2) for the adsorptive removal of CGR on PWM and CPWM are 0.99 and 0.99, respectively, while on PWC and CPWC are also 0.99 and 0.99. The higher values of KF for citric acid processed adsorbents CPWM and CPWC are 2.4 and 2.5 (mg. L-1) × (L.mg-1), respectively, as compared to their unmodified PWM and PWC, which are 0.6 and 1.0 (mg. L-1) × (L.mg-1), respectively, indicating the more surface heterogeneity. The significant parameters are tabulated in Table 3.Figure 15
Nonlinear Freundlich isothermal investigation.


#### 3.5.3. Interpretation of the Temkin Isotherm

The heat of adsorption (BT) of CGR on untreated and chemically treated adsorbent surfaces was linearly reduced as dye molecules [CGR-] progressively covered their interfaces due to their association with active sites [62, 63].The Temkin constantsBT and KT are calculated by using the nonlinear relation shown in Equation (12) [64] and by plotting (qe vs Ce) as illustrated in Figure 16.
(12)qe=BT.lnKT.Ce,where BT= RT/b (kJmol-1) shows the heat of adsorption, while KT is the equilibrium binding constant. The heat of adsorption (BT) values calculated from nonlinear Equation (12) are tabulated in Table 3, which determine the nature of the interactions of dye on the surfaces of each modified and unmodified adsorbent [65]. The greater values of BT of 1.4 and 1.3 J/mole for modified adsorbents CPWM and CPWC, respectively, indicate the stronger adsorbate-adsorbent associations as compared to their unmodified forms PWM and PWC, which are 0.53 and 0.55 J/mole tabulated in Table 3. Furthermore, the nonlinear regression analysis correlation coefficients (R2) for all adsorbents CPWM, CPWC, PWM, and PWC are very close to unity, indicating the suitability and fitness of the Temkin isotherm.Figure 16
Nonlinear Temkin isothermal investigation.Heat of adsorption (BT< 8) values for the adsorption during the adsorbate-adsorbent interactions indicating physio-sorption rather than chemisorption [66, 67]. The equilibrium binding constantKTvalue corresponding to maximum binding energies for adsorption of CGR on CPWM is 6.2 L/g and on PWM is 2.2 L/g, while 8.0 L/g on CPWC and 11.3 L/g on PWC, as tabulated in Table 3, also reflecting suitability and fitting of Temkin isothermal model along with the Langmuir isotherm.


#### 3.5.4. Adsorption Kinetic Investigation

(1) Pseudo First Order. Lagergren nonlinear equation of pseudo first order is displayed in Equation (13), while its graphical plot is shown in Figure 17 [68, 69], and the significant parameters are listed in Table 4.
(13)qt=qe1−e−k1t,where qe is the equilibrium adsorption capacity (mg/g) and qt is the adsorption capacity (mg/g) at time (t) min-1 and K1 indicates the rate constant (g.mg-1.min-1) [70].Figure 17
Nonlinear pseudo first-order kinetic study.Table 4
Nonlinear comparative study of kinetic parameters for detoxification of CGR.
Kinetic adsorption nonlinear parametersCGR on CPWMCGR on PWMCGR on CPWCCGR on PWCPseudo first orderR20.990.990.990.99qe (mg.g-1) (exp.)0.6880.5130.6240.438qe (mg.g-1) (cal.)0.6130.4170.4280.356k1 (per min.)0.3530.0780.08020.160RMSE0.00140.00120.00140.0014P0.8231.4220.8171.76Pseudo second orderR20.990.990.990.99K2 (g. mg-1.Min-1)0.0710.0380.0510.036qe (mg.g-1) (exp.)0.6880.5130.6240.438qe (mg.g-1) (cal.)0.8440.4520.6050.427RMSE1.3910.0030.0040.006P-0.00020.9110.2280.184Figure16 graphically exhibits a nonlinear plot between (qt vs t), and the resulting calculated parameters are tabulated in Table 4. The correlation coefficients (R2) are close to unity and the rate of reaction (K1) for each CPWM, CPWC, PWM, and PWC which are 0.353, 0.0802, 0.078, and 0.160 (per minute). The calculated equilibrium adsorption capacity (qe, mg/g) differs from the experimental (qe, mg/g) in all acid-modified (CPWM, CPWC) and unmodified (PWM, and PWC) adsorbents, indicating that this kinetic model on equilibrium data is unsuitable for adsorptive removal of CGR.(2) Pseudo Second Order. Nonlinear relation of pseudo second order proposed by HO and McKay is depicted in the equation as follows [71, 72] and graphically in Figure 18. The effective parameters are tabulated in Table 4.
(14)qt=k2.qe2.t1+k2.qe.t,where qe is the equilibrium adsorption capacity (mg/g) and qt is the adsorption capacity (mg/g) at time (t) min-1 and K2 (g.mg-1.min-1) indicates the rate constant of experimental outcomes.Figure 18
Nonlinear pseudo second-order kinetic study.The calculated equilibrium adsorption capacity (qe) is nearly close to the experimental equilibrium adsorption capacity (qe), for the adsorption of CGR on CPWM, PWM, CPWC, and PWC, and is 0.84, 0.452, 0.61, and 0.43 mg/g, respectively, reflecting the fitness of pseudo second-order kinetics on equilibrium data of adsorption [73]. Furthermore, the correlation coefficients (R2) for adsorptive removal of dye molecules on all acid-modified and non-modified adsorbents are 0.99 close to unity and are listed in Table 4, indicating the well fitness of pseudo second order than the pseudo first-order kinetics mechanism.To assess the validity of equilibrium data, the root mean square errors for all cases of CGR adsorptive removal are determined using Equation (15) [74], and the percent relative deviation (P) values are calculated using Equation (16) [75] to assess the reliability of the adsorption findings tabulated in Table 4. The lowest values for both RMSE and P for second-order kinetics support its appropriateness and fitness over first-order kinetics [76].
(15)RMSE=∑qecal−qeexp2N,(16)P=100N∑qeexp−qecalqeexp.


### 3.6. Adsorption Thermodynamic Investigations

Nonlinear graphical representation of thermodynamic parameters such as enthalpy change, entropy change, Gibbs free energy, and activation energy was also investigated during experiments to authenticate and validate equilibrium data [77]. Temperature changes correlate with the diffusion, kinetic energy, and angular velocity of CGR in the aqueous phase. This property influences the efficiency of the adsorbents for the adsorption removal mechanism of Congo red dye molecules because of the pervious and rubbery, squishy, and porous surface of hemicellulose and adsorbent peels. The statistical results of the calculated thermodynamic parameters ∆G0, ∆H0, ∆S0, and ∆Ea by using Equations (17), (18), (19), and (20) are listed in Table 5 and are graphically represented in Figure 19.Table 5
Nonlinear comparative study of thermodynamic parameters.
Adsorption of CGR on adsorbentsT (K)KD∆G (kJ/Mol)∆H (kJ/Mol)∆S (J Mol-1 K-1)Ea (kJ/Mol)CGR on CPWM2980.004-13.73080.074-6.67-1454431453180.154-4.95CGR on PWM2980.05-7.43080.126-5.3-57168573180.214-4.1CGR on CPWC2980.027-8.953080.099-5.9-76225763180.183-4.5CGR on PWC2980.074-6.53080.154-4.83180.247-3.7-4813848Figure 19
Nonlinear adsorption thermodynamic approach.The Gibbs free energy calculated from Equation (17) [53], for the adsorption of CGR on chemically modified adsorbents CPWM (-13.7, -6.67, and -4.95 kJmol-1) and CPWC (-8.95, -5.9, and -4.5 kJmol-1), as compared to their unmodified forms, PWM (-7.4, -5.3, and -4.1 kJmol-1) and PWC (-6.5, -4.8, and -3.7 kJmol-1) at 298, 308, and 318 kelvin temperatures, respectively, suggests that the process is spontaneous in standard conditions. [67].
(17)ΔG0=−RTlnKD,(18)lnKD=∆S0R−∆H0RT,(19)KD=C₀−CeCe.The distribution coefficient (KD) was determined from the relation shown in Equation (19), where Co and Ce are the initial and equilibrium concentrations of CGR solutions, respectively, whereas R is the universal gas constant and T is the temperature in kelvin in Equation (17). The change in enthalpy (∆H0) varied between 2.1 and 20.9 kJmol-1, exhibiting physio-sorption, and from 80 to 200 kJmol-1, exhibiting chemisorption [78]. Therefore, exothermic enthalpy changes calculated from Equation (18), for adsorptive eradication of CGR on citric acid-processed biosorbents CPWM is (-145 kJmol-1) and on unprocessed PWM is (-57 kJmol-1), whereas on CPWC is (-76 kJmol-1) and on its raw form is (-48 kJmol-1) indicating the chemisorption adsorption mechanism. The higher the ∆H0 value for citric acid treated biosorbents in comparison to their raw peels reflecting the tighter adsorbate-adsorbent interactions at their surface interfaces, resulting in the efficient eradication of CGR from the water system. The contortion and deformation at the adsorbate-adsorbent interface associated with entropy change (∆S0) is also calculated from Equation (25) [79, 80]. High calculated ∆S0 for adsorptive removal of CGR by CPWM and CPWC is 443 and 225 Jmol-1 K-1, respectively, as compared to 168 Jmol-1 K-1 for PWM and 138 Jmol-1 K-1 for PWC, respectively, listed in Table 5.The increased energies of activation (∆Ea) calculated from Arrhenius Equation (20), for the removal of CGR from the aqueous environment on acid-treated CPWM and CPWC, are 145 and 76 kJmol-1, respectively, whereas on PWM and PWC are 57 and 48 kJmol-1, respectively, indicating the fast and efficient adsorptive removal of CGR on citric acid-treated adsorbents [81]. The adsorption capacity qmax of present investigation is compared with the previous reported data in Table 1.
(20)lnK=lnA−EaRT.


### 3.7. Adsorption Mechanism

Various new additionally provided functional groups including, -OH, –COOH, >C=O, NH2 on the surfaces interfaces of chemically modified adsorbents have been contributed a vital and central role in the adsorptive eradication of CGR from aqueous solutions [82, 83]. CGR, being an acidic as well as an anionic dye, was repelled by the anionic adsorption sites on adsorbents relatively at the high initial pH of the solutions. Protonation of adsorbents at pH 4-5 favors and influences the anionic molecules [CGR-] of dye propelled towards the active adsorbent sites of adsorbents, resulting in an increased rate of adsorption performance as schematically shown in Figure 20.Figure 20
Schematic mechanism of adsorption for CGR ((a) adsorption on untreated adsorbents and (b) adsorption on citric acid-treated adsorbents).
(a)(b)After the assessment and evaluation of numerous experimental results, it was concluded that the adsorption mechanism is primarily linked with both chemisorption and physio-sorption. Chemisorption is associated with chelation reactions between the amino groups (NH2) of CGR molecules and excessive as well as additionally provided carboxylic acid groups (COOH) to citric acid-treated adsorbents [84], whereas physio-sorption is linked with electrostatic interactions such as hydrogen bonding between >C=O of carboxylic acid moieties on adsorbents and partially positively charged hydrogen atoms (H-N-H) of CGR in aqueous solutions [85], as illustrated in the proposed mechanism in Figure 20.


### 3.8. Desorption

Desorption of CGR from exhausted adsorbents was conducted by using different eluents which have capability to break the adsorbate-adsorbent interactions for their further use and to assess the change in their adsorption performance. The most appropriate and promising desorbing agent, 0.1 M NaOH, has been used for CGR desorption from the used adsorbents [86], whereas the high concentration has been avoided because it could damage and degrade the alignment and crystalline structure of cellulosic biomasses, causing a drop in their adsorption performance [87]. The maximum desorption CGR recorded in this investigation was 87% for CPWM, 85% for CPWC, 80% for PWM, and 75% for PWC.Figure21 shows that the adsorptive performance of adsorbents decreased with an increase in the number of cycles for each adsorbent. Desorption of [CGR-] anions was greatly increased by the deprotonation of adsorbents in the pH range of 4–12, due to repulsion towards negatively binding sites of adsorbents by an ion exchange mechanism. The desorption capacity of both adsorbents and the percentage desorption of CGR were calculated from the following equations:
(21)qdesorptionmg.g−1=V×CdesorptionMassadsorbentg,Desorption%ofdyes=qdesorptionmg.g−1qadsorbedmg.g−1×100.Figure 21
Study of comparative recycling of adsorbents for the degradation of CGR.


## 3.1. Assessment of Chemically Modified Adsorbents Using Various Modifying Agents

The performance of both chemically modified (PWM and PWC) adsorbents in terms of adsorption capability is assessed using a variety of modifying agents, as shown graphically in Figure3.Figure 3
Comparative optimization performance of chemically processed adsorbents with different modifying agents.After a series of experiments, it was found that citric acid-treated cellulosic biomass (PWM and PWC) performed better, with the highest CGR adsorption results, and their schematically surface amendment with an increase in COOH through different associations on their surface interfaces is elaborated in Figures2(a) and 2(b). The chemically modified peels of adsorbents (CPWM and CPWC) were prepared as described in Section 2.3 and stored in plastic jars. It was significant to note that throughout the experimentation, chemically modified adsorbents developed quick adsorption equilibrium at low pH (4-6) due to an increase in protonation on the adsorbent-interface, resulting in more electrostatic associations with anionic dye molecules [CGR-] in the aqueous environment.


## 3.2. FTIR Analysis

Results of FTIR analysis for all adsorbents before and after removal of dye are presented in Figures4–6.Figure 4
Comparative FT-IR characterization of native adsorbents ((a) PWM and (b) PWC).Figure 5
Comparative FT-IR characterization of citric acid-treated adsorbents ((c) CPWM and (d) CPWC).Figure 6
Comparative FTIR analysis after adsorption of CGR on chemically modified adsorbents ((e) CGR + PWM, (f) CGR + CPWM, (g) CGR + PWC, and (h) CGR + CPWC)).


### 3.2.1. FT-IR Screening of Raw Adsorbents

Figures4(a) and 4(b) illustrate the FT-IR spectra of raw and unmodified adsorbents PWM and PWC, respectively. The moieties for alcoholic functional groups (OH) are depicted in Figure 4(a) by the frequencies at 3775–3600 cm-1and 2900 cm-1 [41] and Figure 4(b) by the wavenumbers at 3685–3550 cm-1 and 3870 cm-1, respectively. The wavenumbers at 3300 cm-1 and at 1720 cm-1 in Figure 4(a) and at 3285.5 cm-1 and 1685 cm-1 in Figure 4(b) represent the OH for carboxylic acid groups, respectively. The peaks at 1720 cm-1 and at 1685 cm-1 are the signals for C=O groups for COOH moieties [42] in PWM and PWC, respectively. During the study of literature, it was observed that these groups are responsible for the electrostatic associations of the dye molecules during the adsorption mechanism [43].


### 3.2.2. FT-IR Assessment of Acid-Modified Adsorbents

Figures5(c) and 5(d) elaborate FT-IR analysis of the citric acid-chelated PWM and PWC adsorbents.The wavenumbers 3860–3720 cm-1 and 3890–3700 cm-1 correspond to the chemical interactions of citric acid molecules with OH groups via chelation on the interfaces of CPWM and CPWC, as indicated in Figures 5(c) and 5(d), respectively, providing additional adsorption active sites to interfere with CGR molecules during the adsorption process. The peaks at 3300 and 3250 cm-1 depicted OH groups for COOH moieties, while at 2915 cm-1 and 2880 cm-1 were signals for the presence OH groups of alcohols in CPWM and CPWC, respectively. The strong peaks at 1705 and 1660 cm-1 evidenced the carbonyl groups of COOH on the interfaces of CPWM and CPWC [44], which might be responsible for dye molecule affiliations due to their polarity, whereas signals at 1350 and 1325 cm-1 indicated OH (bending) for alcohols on the surfaces of CPWM and CPWC, respectively [45, 46].


### 3.2.3. FT-IR Analysis after Adsorption of CGR on Acid-Modified Adsorbents

Figure6 illustrates the FT-IR evaluation after the adsorption of CGR on chemically treated adsorbents.The frequency range at 3840-3690 cm-1 and 3900-3670 cm-1 represents hydrogen bonds between (>C=O) of carboxylic acid and (>NH2) of CGR, as well as (OH) of tricarboxylic acid and lone pairs on (NH2) of CGR, respectively [47], under the influence of the low initial pH range between 5 and 6, depicted in Figures 6(f) and 6(h) for CPWM and CPWC, respectively, whereas in Figures 6(e) and 6(g) for PWM and PWC, respectively. This has obviously shown good adsorption performance of CPWM and CPWC due to amendment of surface morphology as compared to their raw and unmodified forms. The adsorption performance of CGR was directly linked to the influence of interactions due to the protonation of COOH on the interfaces of each CPWM and CPWC. The intermolecular associations between CGR and -OH of COOH moieties are also depicted at the wavenumbers 2880 and 2820 cm-1 in Figure 6(f) and 2800 and 2700 cm-1 in Figure 6(h), respectively. Peaks at 1680 cm-1 in Figure 6(f) and 1650 cm-1 in Figure 6(h) indicate the possibility of oxime formation between (>C=O) of COOH on adsorbent surfaces and NH2 of CGR molecules from aqueous solution. As a result, the citric acid modification of both adsorbents performed more efficient and faster adsorption processes than their raw and native forms [48, 49].


## 3.2.1. FT-IR Screening of Raw Adsorbents

Figures4(a) and 4(b) illustrate the FT-IR spectra of raw and unmodified adsorbents PWM and PWC, respectively. The moieties for alcoholic functional groups (OH) are depicted in Figure 4(a) by the frequencies at 3775–3600 cm-1and 2900 cm-1 [41] and Figure 4(b) by the wavenumbers at 3685–3550 cm-1 and 3870 cm-1, respectively. The wavenumbers at 3300 cm-1 and at 1720 cm-1 in Figure 4(a) and at 3285.5 cm-1 and 1685 cm-1 in Figure 4(b) represent the OH for carboxylic acid groups, respectively. The peaks at 1720 cm-1 and at 1685 cm-1 are the signals for C=O groups for COOH moieties [42] in PWM and PWC, respectively. During the study of literature, it was observed that these groups are responsible for the electrostatic associations of the dye molecules during the adsorption mechanism [43].


## 3.2.2. FT-IR Assessment of Acid-Modified Adsorbents

Figures5(c) and 5(d) elaborate FT-IR analysis of the citric acid-chelated PWM and PWC adsorbents.The wavenumbers 3860–3720 cm-1 and 3890–3700 cm-1 correspond to the chemical interactions of citric acid molecules with OH groups via chelation on the interfaces of CPWM and CPWC, as indicated in Figures 5(c) and 5(d), respectively, providing additional adsorption active sites to interfere with CGR molecules during the adsorption process. The peaks at 3300 and 3250 cm-1 depicted OH groups for COOH moieties, while at 2915 cm-1 and 2880 cm-1 were signals for the presence OH groups of alcohols in CPWM and CPWC, respectively. The strong peaks at 1705 and 1660 cm-1 evidenced the carbonyl groups of COOH on the interfaces of CPWM and CPWC [44], which might be responsible for dye molecule affiliations due to their polarity, whereas signals at 1350 and 1325 cm-1 indicated OH (bending) for alcohols on the surfaces of CPWM and CPWC, respectively [45, 46].


## 3.2.3. FT-IR Analysis after Adsorption of CGR on Acid-Modified Adsorbents

Figure6 illustrates the FT-IR evaluation after the adsorption of CGR on chemically treated adsorbents.The frequency range at 3840-3690 cm-1 and 3900-3670 cm-1 represents hydrogen bonds between (>C=O) of carboxylic acid and (>NH2) of CGR, as well as (OH) of tricarboxylic acid and lone pairs on (NH2) of CGR, respectively [47], under the influence of the low initial pH range between 5 and 6, depicted in Figures 6(f) and 6(h) for CPWM and CPWC, respectively, whereas in Figures 6(e) and 6(g) for PWM and PWC, respectively. This has obviously shown good adsorption performance of CPWM and CPWC due to amendment of surface morphology as compared to their raw and unmodified forms. The adsorption performance of CGR was directly linked to the influence of interactions due to the protonation of COOH on the interfaces of each CPWM and CPWC. The intermolecular associations between CGR and -OH of COOH moieties are also depicted at the wavenumbers 2880 and 2820 cm-1 in Figure 6(f) and 2800 and 2700 cm-1 in Figure 6(h), respectively. Peaks at 1680 cm-1 in Figure 6(f) and 1650 cm-1 in Figure 6(h) indicate the possibility of oxime formation between (>C=O) of COOH on adsorbent surfaces and NH2 of CGR molecules from aqueous solution. As a result, the citric acid modification of both adsorbents performed more efficient and faster adsorption processes than their raw and native forms [48, 49].


## 3.3. SEM Analysis

Figure7(a) represents the screening electron micrograph of native, unprocessed PWM. This includes empty spaces, relatively small, imbedded bouts of depression, and thick spiral clusters, while Figure 7(b) demonstrates its citric acid-treated modified form (CPWM), which has been transformed into flannel, flossy, blocky, wavy, and fluffy objects with varying increased numbers of adsorption binding sites for effective and quicker removal of acid dye (CGR) from aqueous solution. Figure 7(c) displays raw PWC with stuffed fibrous forms, holes, and gaps, whereas Figure 7(d) reveals amended arrangements of its citric acid-modified form (CPWC) with random cylindrical, blocky, and cone-like structural arrangements having a larger surface area. This indicates that the surface topography of PWC has indeed been altered. It is also evidenced by FT-IR characterization, resulting in the provision and promotion of additional adsorption binding sites for the adsorptive exclusion of CGR from the water system.Figure 7
SEM comparison of adsorbents before and after chemical modification as well as dye loading ((a) PWM, (b) CPWM, (c) PWC, (d) CPWC, (e) CGR+ CPWM, and (f) CGR + CPWC).
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)Figure7(e) represents the SEM micrograph after the adsorption of CGR on CPWM. It is obviously different morphologically from the CPWM due to its appearance as threadlike, zigzag, highly wavy, fibroid, stringy, and tough, reflecting the good and more percentage adsorption of CGR. Figure 7(f) depicts SEM images of CPWC after CGR adsorption, with a texture resembling thick, coriaceous, tough, cloggy, disk-like, hardened, and manifold, indicating more dye adsorption.


## 3.4. Optimization of Operating Factors

Operational parameters for the assessment of adsorption efficiency of CGR on each PWM, PWC, CPWM, and CPWC were optimized experimentally as under.


### 3.4.1. Optimization of Biosorbents Dosage

Biosorbent dosage has a significant impact on the efficiency of the adsorption mechanism. The experiments were conducted in four sets of 250-mL Erlenmeyer flasks, and each set included ten flasks containing 25 ppm CGR with a volume of 25 mL.The biosorbent dosage range of 0.2-2 g was studied with a difference of 0.2 g for each PWM, CPWM, PWC, and CPWC at 40°C, initial pH 4, and 125 rpm agitation speed. The maximal adsorptive removal rate of acid dye was established experimentally as follows: 71.4% removal of CGR on 0.8 g of PWM and 95% removal of CGR on 0.8 g of its acid-treated form, CPWM, whereas 75.7% eradication of CGR on 0.8 g of PWC and 95% on 1.0 g of CPWC illustrated in Figure8. The decrease in adsorption performance with an increase in adsorbent dosage is due to the rapid establishment of equilibrium between CGR and at the interfaces of each adsorbent due to the many unoccupied adsorption sites as depicted in Figure 8 [50]. The optimized 0.8 g adsorbent dosage for each adsorption case was selected in this investigation.Figure 8
Optimization of biosorbents dosage.


### 3.4.2. Optimization of Contact Time Duration

The effectiveness of the adsorption process is equivalent to the number of accessible binding sites on the interfaces of each PWM, CPWM, PWC, and CPWC.Figure9 reveals the determination of 84.3% adsorptive elimination of CGR on PWM at 30 minutes and 95% on its acid modification and CPWM at 25 minutes, whereas 75.7% on PWC at 40 minutes and 97.2% on CPWC at 20 minutes after batch mode experiments. The experiments were conducted by using 25 ppm solutions with a volume of 25 mL on 0.8 g of each adsorbent at 40°C, 125 rpm, and an initial pH of 4. Adsorption declines with time by the unit mass of each adsorbent after a specific frequency owing to equilibrium, leaving numerous empty adsorption binding sites unoccupied [51], as shown in Figure 9.Figure 9
Optimization of contact time.


### 3.4.3. Agitation Rate Optimization

Another important operational parameter that controlled the adsorption rate for the elimination of CGR from water on PWM, CPWM, PWC, and CPWC was the agitation rate (rpm). This factor was investigated at speeds ranging from 25 to 200 rpm, with a 25 rpm variation at 40°C temperature, and an initial pH of 4 on 0.8 g of each adsorbent dosage.Figure10 displays the biosorption removal of CGR as follows: 73.5% on PWM at 125 rpm and 97.2% on its citric acid-modified form CPWM at 125 rpm, whereas 75.7% on native PWC at 125 rpm and 92.9% on its amended formulation at CPWC at 125 rpm, indicating the effective adsorption performance of chemically treated adsorbents as compared to their untreated forms. During the experiments, it was found that fast agitation speeds generated a thin layer of CGR molecules from the bulk on the surface interface of each adsorbent, which directly decreased the adsorption performance and increased the desorption of CGR [32]. The decrease in percentage adsorption of CGR at high agitation speeds of 125 rpm on CPWM and CPWC and 150 rpm on unmodified adsorbents PWM and PWC is also due to the fast and increased number of collisions of dye molecules on the adsorbent surfaces. The resulting repulsive forces become more operative and significant between free anionic [CGR-] molecules in an aqueous system and adsorbed CGR molecules on the interfaces of adsorbents [52]. Furthermore, the negatively charged binding sites on the surfaces of adsorbents also repelled the anionic dye molecules during the high agitation rate. Thus, increased agitation rates quantitatively increase desorption of CGR from the interfaces of adsorbents under the influence of the ion exchange mechanism [33]. Therefore, an optimized agitation rate of 125 rpm is determined after repeated experiments for further investigation, as depicted in Figure 10.Figure 10
Optimization of agitation rate.


### 3.4.4. Optimization of Temperature for Adsorption Mechanism

Kinetic energy is directly linked with the variation of temperature of the CGR solution and ultimately influences the thermodynamic parameters, resulting in adsorption performance of biosorbents. The biosorption performance was investigated for a temperature range of 10–80°C with a difference of 10°C for 25 ppm CGR solution with a volume of 25 mL on 0.8 g of each biosorbent at 125 rpm and at initial pH 5. A temperature-controlled water bath was employed to keep the temperature stable during the experiment. This experiment was carried out to better understand the physical changes that occur on adsorbents when temperatures rise. To prevent evaporation, the experimental flasks were sealed with Al-foil. The experiment was carried out to better understand the physical changes that occur on adsorbents when temperatures rise.Figure11 graphically represents the biosorption results, which are as follows: PWM eliminated 75.7% of CGR at 40°C, and its acid-modified form, CPWM, eliminated 95% of CGR at 30°C, whereas PWC and its acid modification, CPWC, eliminated 80 and 92.9% of CGR, respectively, at 40°C. The adsorption performance decreases after 40°C in each of the cases which can be analyzed in Figure 11. This might be due to devastation, decimation, and disintegration of the structure lignocellulosic biomass of each adsorbent [53]. This behavior can be analyzed for PWM at 60°C which has been shown to have an 80% eradication of CGR, and for PWC, which has shown a decrease in adsorption at 40 to 50°C from 80% to 73.5%, with an afterward increase in adsorption to 80% again at 50 to 60°C. As a result, a temperature of 40°C was determined to be optimal for future adsorption experiments.Figure 11
Optimization the effect of temperature.


### 3.4.5. Optimization of pH for Adsorption Performance

The adsorption process is specifically correlated to the initial pH of the dye solution [54]. The biosorption potential was examined for a pH range of 1–10, for a 25 ppm CGR solution with a volume of 25 mL on 0.8 g of each biosorbent at optimal temperature, contacting duration, and agitation speed. 0.1 molar of each NaOH or HCl solution was used to regulate pH during the adsorption experiments. Low pH favored protonation at the interface surfaces of each adsorbent PWM, PWC, CPWM, and CPWC, resulting in anions [CGR-] flowing quickly towards adsorbents, overcoming repulsive forces [55, 56].The amino groups of CGR get chelated with the COOH moieties on the adsorbent surfaces. During batch experiments, it was discovered that at pH 4-6, the adsorption of CGR molecules was quick and promising, but that with a unit one increase in pH 6-10, the results were unfavorable, which could be due to an increase in deprotonation of COOH moieties on adsorbents providing anionic binding sites, resulting in an increase in repulsion against [CGR-] ions in the aqueous system. Figure12 illustrates graphically the maximum adsorption elimination of CGR on PWM 82% at pH = 4, on CPWM 95% at pH = 4, on PWC 75.7% at pH 4, and on CPWC 93% at pH 4. As a result, the optimal pH value 4 was chosen for future investigations.Figure 12
The impact of initial pH on adsorption performance.


## 3.4.1. Optimization of Biosorbents Dosage

Biosorbent dosage has a significant impact on the efficiency of the adsorption mechanism. The experiments were conducted in four sets of 250-mL Erlenmeyer flasks, and each set included ten flasks containing 25 ppm CGR with a volume of 25 mL.The biosorbent dosage range of 0.2-2 g was studied with a difference of 0.2 g for each PWM, CPWM, PWC, and CPWC at 40°C, initial pH 4, and 125 rpm agitation speed. The maximal adsorptive removal rate of acid dye was established experimentally as follows: 71.4% removal of CGR on 0.8 g of PWM and 95% removal of CGR on 0.8 g of its acid-treated form, CPWM, whereas 75.7% eradication of CGR on 0.8 g of PWC and 95% on 1.0 g of CPWC illustrated in Figure8. The decrease in adsorption performance with an increase in adsorbent dosage is due to the rapid establishment of equilibrium between CGR and at the interfaces of each adsorbent due to the many unoccupied adsorption sites as depicted in Figure 8 [50]. The optimized 0.8 g adsorbent dosage for each adsorption case was selected in this investigation.Figure 8
Optimization of biosorbents dosage.


## 3.4.2. Optimization of Contact Time Duration

The effectiveness of the adsorption process is equivalent to the number of accessible binding sites on the interfaces of each PWM, CPWM, PWC, and CPWC.Figure9 reveals the determination of 84.3% adsorptive elimination of CGR on PWM at 30 minutes and 95% on its acid modification and CPWM at 25 minutes, whereas 75.7% on PWC at 40 minutes and 97.2% on CPWC at 20 minutes after batch mode experiments. The experiments were conducted by using 25 ppm solutions with a volume of 25 mL on 0.8 g of each adsorbent at 40°C, 125 rpm, and an initial pH of 4. Adsorption declines with time by the unit mass of each adsorbent after a specific frequency owing to equilibrium, leaving numerous empty adsorption binding sites unoccupied [51], as shown in Figure 9.Figure 9
Optimization of contact time.


## 3.4.3. Agitation Rate Optimization

Another important operational parameter that controlled the adsorption rate for the elimination of CGR from water on PWM, CPWM, PWC, and CPWC was the agitation rate (rpm). This factor was investigated at speeds ranging from 25 to 200 rpm, with a 25 rpm variation at 40°C temperature, and an initial pH of 4 on 0.8 g of each adsorbent dosage.Figure10 displays the biosorption removal of CGR as follows: 73.5% on PWM at 125 rpm and 97.2% on its citric acid-modified form CPWM at 125 rpm, whereas 75.7% on native PWC at 125 rpm and 92.9% on its amended formulation at CPWC at 125 rpm, indicating the effective adsorption performance of chemically treated adsorbents as compared to their untreated forms. During the experiments, it was found that fast agitation speeds generated a thin layer of CGR molecules from the bulk on the surface interface of each adsorbent, which directly decreased the adsorption performance and increased the desorption of CGR [32]. The decrease in percentage adsorption of CGR at high agitation speeds of 125 rpm on CPWM and CPWC and 150 rpm on unmodified adsorbents PWM and PWC is also due to the fast and increased number of collisions of dye molecules on the adsorbent surfaces. The resulting repulsive forces become more operative and significant between free anionic [CGR-] molecules in an aqueous system and adsorbed CGR molecules on the interfaces of adsorbents [52]. Furthermore, the negatively charged binding sites on the surfaces of adsorbents also repelled the anionic dye molecules during the high agitation rate. Thus, increased agitation rates quantitatively increase desorption of CGR from the interfaces of adsorbents under the influence of the ion exchange mechanism [33]. Therefore, an optimized agitation rate of 125 rpm is determined after repeated experiments for further investigation, as depicted in Figure 10.Figure 10
Optimization of agitation rate.


## 3.4.4. Optimization of Temperature for Adsorption Mechanism

Kinetic energy is directly linked with the variation of temperature of the CGR solution and ultimately influences the thermodynamic parameters, resulting in adsorption performance of biosorbents. The biosorption performance was investigated for a temperature range of 10–80°C with a difference of 10°C for 25 ppm CGR solution with a volume of 25 mL on 0.8 g of each biosorbent at 125 rpm and at initial pH 5. A temperature-controlled water bath was employed to keep the temperature stable during the experiment. This experiment was carried out to better understand the physical changes that occur on adsorbents when temperatures rise. To prevent evaporation, the experimental flasks were sealed with Al-foil. The experiment was carried out to better understand the physical changes that occur on adsorbents when temperatures rise.Figure11 graphically represents the biosorption results, which are as follows: PWM eliminated 75.7% of CGR at 40°C, and its acid-modified form, CPWM, eliminated 95% of CGR at 30°C, whereas PWC and its acid modification, CPWC, eliminated 80 and 92.9% of CGR, respectively, at 40°C. The adsorption performance decreases after 40°C in each of the cases which can be analyzed in Figure 11. This might be due to devastation, decimation, and disintegration of the structure lignocellulosic biomass of each adsorbent [53]. This behavior can be analyzed for PWM at 60°C which has been shown to have an 80% eradication of CGR, and for PWC, which has shown a decrease in adsorption at 40 to 50°C from 80% to 73.5%, with an afterward increase in adsorption to 80% again at 50 to 60°C. As a result, a temperature of 40°C was determined to be optimal for future adsorption experiments.Figure 11
Optimization the effect of temperature.


## 3.4.5. Optimization of pH for Adsorption Performance

The adsorption process is specifically correlated to the initial pH of the dye solution [54]. The biosorption potential was examined for a pH range of 1–10, for a 25 ppm CGR solution with a volume of 25 mL on 0.8 g of each biosorbent at optimal temperature, contacting duration, and agitation speed. 0.1 molar of each NaOH or HCl solution was used to regulate pH during the adsorption experiments. Low pH favored protonation at the interface surfaces of each adsorbent PWM, PWC, CPWM, and CPWC, resulting in anions [CGR-] flowing quickly towards adsorbents, overcoming repulsive forces [55, 56].The amino groups of CGR get chelated with the COOH moieties on the adsorbent surfaces. During batch experiments, it was discovered that at pH 4-6, the adsorption of CGR molecules was quick and promising, but that with a unit one increase in pH 6-10, the results were unfavorable, which could be due to an increase in deprotonation of COOH moieties on adsorbents providing anionic binding sites, resulting in an increase in repulsion against [CGR-] ions in the aqueous system. Figure12 illustrates graphically the maximum adsorption elimination of CGR on PWM 82% at pH = 4, on CPWM 95% at pH = 4, on PWC 75.7% at pH 4, and on CPWC 93% at pH 4. As a result, the optimal pH value 4 was chosen for future investigations.Figure 12
The impact of initial pH on adsorption performance.


## 3.5. Adsorption Isothermal and Kinetics Investigations

The adsorption of CGR on modified and unmodified adsorbents was investigated by applying Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin as well as kinetics models of equilibrium under optimized operational conditions as follows: adsorbent dosage of 0.8 g, initial pH of 4, and 25 ppm CGR solutions with a volume of 100 mL at 40°C and 125 rpm shaking speed.


### 3.5.1. Interpretation of the Langmuir Adsorption Model

A nonlinear Langmuir isothermal plot (Qe vs Ce) is expressed in Figure 13. The following equation represents nonlinear form of the Langmuir model [57, 58], while significant Langmuir parameters are tabulated in Table 3.
(8)qe=b.Ce.qmax1+b.Cenonlinear,(9)qe=Co−CeVm,(10)R%=Co−CeCo×100.Figure 13
Nonlinear Langmuir isothermal investigation.Table 3
A comparative nonlinear isothermal studies for the adsorptive removal of CGR.
Parameters for nonlinear isothermsCGR on CPWMCGR on PWMCGR on CPWCCGR on PWCLangmuir isothermR20.990.990.990.98qmax (mg. g-1)8.32.237.954.32b (L.mg-1)0.420.270.530.24Standard deviations1.0030.4601.0110.765ΔG° (kJmol-1)-2.2-3.2-1.6-3.5RMSE0.02770.00670.11890.0480Freundlich isothermR20.990.990.990.99n0.7290.3970.6680.495KF (mg. L-1) × (L.mg-1)1/n2.370.6332.491.03RMSE0.00024.8×10−050.00020.0001Temkin isothermR20.990.990.990.99BT (J/mole) × (mg.g-1)-11.40.531.30.55KT (L.g-1)6.22.28.011.3The adsorption capacity and percentage removal (R%) of CGR are calculated from Equations (9) and (10), respectively, whereqeis the adsorbed quantity of CGR andCeis the quantity of CGR left after adsorption, whileqm(mg.g-1) is the highest adsorption capacity, andbis (L.g-1) for adsorption energy, whereas in equation (9),Vis the volume of adsorbate in dm3, while (m) is related to the mass of each adsorbent used in experimental work [59]. The correlation coefficients (R2) for the adsorption of CGR on CPWM, PWM, CPWC, and PWC are 0.999, 0.998, 0.997, and 0.988, respectively, and are closer to unity, while the maximum adsorption capacities (Qmax) of both citric acid processed adsorbents CPWM and CPWC are 8.3 and 7.95, respectively, as compared to their unmodified forms, PWM and PWC, which are 2.23 and 4.32 mg/g, respectively, reflecting the suitability and fitness of this isothermal model for the adsorptive eradication of CGR from aqueous solutions. The qmax of present study is compared with the previous reported data in Table 1. The Langmuir constants “b” (adsorption energy) for acid-treated adsorbents CPWM and CPWC are 0.42 and 0.53, which are sufficiently high as compared to unmodified adsorbents PWM and PWC at 0.27 and 0.24 (L.g-1), respectively. These Langmuir constants “b” are calculated from the nonlinear mode of Langmuir isotherm Equation (8), reflecting the more adsorption energy and comparatively stronger forces between dye molecules and interfaces of citric acid-treated adsorbents due to the availability of additional COOH moieties. The nonlinear regression analysis results of this isotherm tabulated in Table 3 express the suitability and fitness of this model on equilibrium data.These statistics and findings relate to monolayer homogenous adsorption due to a set number of equivalent binding adsorption sites spread on adsorbents surfaces. The standard deviations for PWM, CPWM, PWC, and CPWC are 0.46, 1.003, 0.765, and 1.011, respectively, and are expressed in Figure14.Figure 14
Study of standard deviations.


### 3.5.2. Interpretation of the Freundlich Isotherm

The nonlinear form of Freundlich isotherm is shown in Equation (11) and is graphically represented in Figure 15. This isothermal model correlates with the surface heterogeneity and potency of biomass towards adsorption of CGR from aqueous solutions [60, 61].
(11)qe=KFCe1/n,where Freundlich adsorption constants KF (mg. L-1) × (L.mg-1)1/n are associated with adsorption capacity and n with adsorption intensity. The significant calculated parameters of this isotherm are tabulated in Table 3. The correlation coefficients (R2) for the adsorptive removal of CGR on PWM and CPWM are 0.99 and 0.99, respectively, while on PWC and CPWC are also 0.99 and 0.99. The higher values of KF for citric acid processed adsorbents CPWM and CPWC are 2.4 and 2.5 (mg. L-1) × (L.mg-1), respectively, as compared to their unmodified PWM and PWC, which are 0.6 and 1.0 (mg. L-1) × (L.mg-1), respectively, indicating the more surface heterogeneity. The significant parameters are tabulated in Table 3.Figure 15
Nonlinear Freundlich isothermal investigation.


### 3.5.3. Interpretation of the Temkin Isotherm

The heat of adsorption (BT) of CGR on untreated and chemically treated adsorbent surfaces was linearly reduced as dye molecules [CGR-] progressively covered their interfaces due to their association with active sites [62, 63].The Temkin constantsBT and KT are calculated by using the nonlinear relation shown in Equation (12) [64] and by plotting (qe vs Ce) as illustrated in Figure 16.
(12)qe=BT.lnKT.Ce,where BT= RT/b (kJmol-1) shows the heat of adsorption, while KT is the equilibrium binding constant. The heat of adsorption (BT) values calculated from nonlinear Equation (12) are tabulated in Table 3, which determine the nature of the interactions of dye on the surfaces of each modified and unmodified adsorbent [65]. The greater values of BT of 1.4 and 1.3 J/mole for modified adsorbents CPWM and CPWC, respectively, indicate the stronger adsorbate-adsorbent associations as compared to their unmodified forms PWM and PWC, which are 0.53 and 0.55 J/mole tabulated in Table 3. Furthermore, the nonlinear regression analysis correlation coefficients (R2) for all adsorbents CPWM, CPWC, PWM, and PWC are very close to unity, indicating the suitability and fitness of the Temkin isotherm.Figure 16
Nonlinear Temkin isothermal investigation.Heat of adsorption (BT< 8) values for the adsorption during the adsorbate-adsorbent interactions indicating physio-sorption rather than chemisorption [66, 67]. The equilibrium binding constantKTvalue corresponding to maximum binding energies for adsorption of CGR on CPWM is 6.2 L/g and on PWM is 2.2 L/g, while 8.0 L/g on CPWC and 11.3 L/g on PWC, as tabulated in Table 3, also reflecting suitability and fitting of Temkin isothermal model along with the Langmuir isotherm.


### 3.5.4. Adsorption Kinetic Investigation

(1) Pseudo First Order. Lagergren nonlinear equation of pseudo first order is displayed in Equation (13), while its graphical plot is shown in Figure 17 [68, 69], and the significant parameters are listed in Table 4.
(13)qt=qe1−e−k1t,where qe is the equilibrium adsorption capacity (mg/g) and qt is the adsorption capacity (mg/g) at time (t) min-1 and K1 indicates the rate constant (g.mg-1.min-1) [70].Figure 17
Nonlinear pseudo first-order kinetic study.Table 4
Nonlinear comparative study of kinetic parameters for detoxification of CGR.
Kinetic adsorption nonlinear parametersCGR on CPWMCGR on PWMCGR on CPWCCGR on PWCPseudo first orderR20.990.990.990.99qe (mg.g-1) (exp.)0.6880.5130.6240.438qe (mg.g-1) (cal.)0.6130.4170.4280.356k1 (per min.)0.3530.0780.08020.160RMSE0.00140.00120.00140.0014P0.8231.4220.8171.76Pseudo second orderR20.990.990.990.99K2 (g. mg-1.Min-1)0.0710.0380.0510.036qe (mg.g-1) (exp.)0.6880.5130.6240.438qe (mg.g-1) (cal.)0.8440.4520.6050.427RMSE1.3910.0030.0040.006P-0.00020.9110.2280.184Figure16 graphically exhibits a nonlinear plot between (qt vs t), and the resulting calculated parameters are tabulated in Table 4. The correlation coefficients (R2) are close to unity and the rate of reaction (K1) for each CPWM, CPWC, PWM, and PWC which are 0.353, 0.0802, 0.078, and 0.160 (per minute). The calculated equilibrium adsorption capacity (qe, mg/g) differs from the experimental (qe, mg/g) in all acid-modified (CPWM, CPWC) and unmodified (PWM, and PWC) adsorbents, indicating that this kinetic model on equilibrium data is unsuitable for adsorptive removal of CGR.(2) Pseudo Second Order. Nonlinear relation of pseudo second order proposed by HO and McKay is depicted in the equation as follows [71, 72] and graphically in Figure 18. The effective parameters are tabulated in Table 4.
(14)qt=k2.qe2.t1+k2.qe.t,where qe is the equilibrium adsorption capacity (mg/g) and qt is the adsorption capacity (mg/g) at time (t) min-1 and K2 (g.mg-1.min-1) indicates the rate constant of experimental outcomes.Figure 18
Nonlinear pseudo second-order kinetic study.The calculated equilibrium adsorption capacity (qe) is nearly close to the experimental equilibrium adsorption capacity (qe), for the adsorption of CGR on CPWM, PWM, CPWC, and PWC, and is 0.84, 0.452, 0.61, and 0.43 mg/g, respectively, reflecting the fitness of pseudo second-order kinetics on equilibrium data of adsorption [73]. Furthermore, the correlation coefficients (R2) for adsorptive removal of dye molecules on all acid-modified and non-modified adsorbents are 0.99 close to unity and are listed in Table 4, indicating the well fitness of pseudo second order than the pseudo first-order kinetics mechanism.To assess the validity of equilibrium data, the root mean square errors for all cases of CGR adsorptive removal are determined using Equation (15) [74], and the percent relative deviation (P) values are calculated using Equation (16) [75] to assess the reliability of the adsorption findings tabulated in Table 4. The lowest values for both RMSE and P for second-order kinetics support its appropriateness and fitness over first-order kinetics [76].
(15)RMSE=∑qecal−qeexp2N,(16)P=100N∑qeexp−qecalqeexp.


## 3.5.1. Interpretation of the Langmuir Adsorption Model

A nonlinear Langmuir isothermal plot (Qe vs Ce) is expressed in Figure 13. The following equation represents nonlinear form of the Langmuir model [57, 58], while significant Langmuir parameters are tabulated in Table 3.
(8)qe=b.Ce.qmax1+b.Cenonlinear,(9)qe=Co−CeVm,(10)R%=Co−CeCo×100.Figure 13
Nonlinear Langmuir isothermal investigation.Table 3
A comparative nonlinear isothermal studies for the adsorptive removal of CGR.
Parameters for nonlinear isothermsCGR on CPWMCGR on PWMCGR on CPWCCGR on PWCLangmuir isothermR20.990.990.990.98qmax (mg. g-1)8.32.237.954.32b (L.mg-1)0.420.270.530.24Standard deviations1.0030.4601.0110.765ΔG° (kJmol-1)-2.2-3.2-1.6-3.5RMSE0.02770.00670.11890.0480Freundlich isothermR20.990.990.990.99n0.7290.3970.6680.495KF (mg. L-1) × (L.mg-1)1/n2.370.6332.491.03RMSE0.00024.8×10−050.00020.0001Temkin isothermR20.990.990.990.99BT (J/mole) × (mg.g-1)-11.40.531.30.55KT (L.g-1)6.22.28.011.3The adsorption capacity and percentage removal (R%) of CGR are calculated from Equations (9) and (10), respectively, whereqeis the adsorbed quantity of CGR andCeis the quantity of CGR left after adsorption, whileqm(mg.g-1) is the highest adsorption capacity, andbis (L.g-1) for adsorption energy, whereas in equation (9),Vis the volume of adsorbate in dm3, while (m) is related to the mass of each adsorbent used in experimental work [59]. The correlation coefficients (R2) for the adsorption of CGR on CPWM, PWM, CPWC, and PWC are 0.999, 0.998, 0.997, and 0.988, respectively, and are closer to unity, while the maximum adsorption capacities (Qmax) of both citric acid processed adsorbents CPWM and CPWC are 8.3 and 7.95, respectively, as compared to their unmodified forms, PWM and PWC, which are 2.23 and 4.32 mg/g, respectively, reflecting the suitability and fitness of this isothermal model for the adsorptive eradication of CGR from aqueous solutions. The qmax of present study is compared with the previous reported data in Table 1. The Langmuir constants “b” (adsorption energy) for acid-treated adsorbents CPWM and CPWC are 0.42 and 0.53, which are sufficiently high as compared to unmodified adsorbents PWM and PWC at 0.27 and 0.24 (L.g-1), respectively. These Langmuir constants “b” are calculated from the nonlinear mode of Langmuir isotherm Equation (8), reflecting the more adsorption energy and comparatively stronger forces between dye molecules and interfaces of citric acid-treated adsorbents due to the availability of additional COOH moieties. The nonlinear regression analysis results of this isotherm tabulated in Table 3 express the suitability and fitness of this model on equilibrium data.These statistics and findings relate to monolayer homogenous adsorption due to a set number of equivalent binding adsorption sites spread on adsorbents surfaces. The standard deviations for PWM, CPWM, PWC, and CPWC are 0.46, 1.003, 0.765, and 1.011, respectively, and are expressed in Figure14.Figure 14
Study of standard deviations.


## 3.5.2. Interpretation of the Freundlich Isotherm

The nonlinear form of Freundlich isotherm is shown in Equation (11) and is graphically represented in Figure 15. This isothermal model correlates with the surface heterogeneity and potency of biomass towards adsorption of CGR from aqueous solutions [60, 61].
(11)qe=KFCe1/n,where Freundlich adsorption constants KF (mg. L-1) × (L.mg-1)1/n are associated with adsorption capacity and n with adsorption intensity. The significant calculated parameters of this isotherm are tabulated in Table 3. The correlation coefficients (R2) for the adsorptive removal of CGR on PWM and CPWM are 0.99 and 0.99, respectively, while on PWC and CPWC are also 0.99 and 0.99. The higher values of KF for citric acid processed adsorbents CPWM and CPWC are 2.4 and 2.5 (mg. L-1) × (L.mg-1), respectively, as compared to their unmodified PWM and PWC, which are 0.6 and 1.0 (mg. L-1) × (L.mg-1), respectively, indicating the more surface heterogeneity. The significant parameters are tabulated in Table 3.Figure 15
Nonlinear Freundlich isothermal investigation.


## 3.5.3. Interpretation of the Temkin Isotherm

The heat of adsorption (BT) of CGR on untreated and chemically treated adsorbent surfaces was linearly reduced as dye molecules [CGR-] progressively covered their interfaces due to their association with active sites [62, 63].The Temkin constantsBT and KT are calculated by using the nonlinear relation shown in Equation (12) [64] and by plotting (qe vs Ce) as illustrated in Figure 16.
(12)qe=BT.lnKT.Ce,where BT= RT/b (kJmol-1) shows the heat of adsorption, while KT is the equilibrium binding constant. The heat of adsorption (BT) values calculated from nonlinear Equation (12) are tabulated in Table 3, which determine the nature of the interactions of dye on the surfaces of each modified and unmodified adsorbent [65]. The greater values of BT of 1.4 and 1.3 J/mole for modified adsorbents CPWM and CPWC, respectively, indicate the stronger adsorbate-adsorbent associations as compared to their unmodified forms PWM and PWC, which are 0.53 and 0.55 J/mole tabulated in Table 3. Furthermore, the nonlinear regression analysis correlation coefficients (R2) for all adsorbents CPWM, CPWC, PWM, and PWC are very close to unity, indicating the suitability and fitness of the Temkin isotherm.Figure 16
Nonlinear Temkin isothermal investigation.Heat of adsorption (BT< 8) values for the adsorption during the adsorbate-adsorbent interactions indicating physio-sorption rather than chemisorption [66, 67]. The equilibrium binding constantKTvalue corresponding to maximum binding energies for adsorption of CGR on CPWM is 6.2 L/g and on PWM is 2.2 L/g, while 8.0 L/g on CPWC and 11.3 L/g on PWC, as tabulated in Table 3, also reflecting suitability and fitting of Temkin isothermal model along with the Langmuir isotherm.


## 3.5.4. Adsorption Kinetic Investigation

(1) Pseudo First Order. Lagergren nonlinear equation of pseudo first order is displayed in Equation (13), while its graphical plot is shown in Figure 17 [68, 69], and the significant parameters are listed in Table 4.
(13)qt=qe1−e−k1t,where qe is the equilibrium adsorption capacity (mg/g) and qt is the adsorption capacity (mg/g) at time (t) min-1 and K1 indicates the rate constant (g.mg-1.min-1) [70].Figure 17
Nonlinear pseudo first-order kinetic study.Table 4
Nonlinear comparative study of kinetic parameters for detoxification of CGR.
Kinetic adsorption nonlinear parametersCGR on CPWMCGR on PWMCGR on CPWCCGR on PWCPseudo first orderR20.990.990.990.99qe (mg.g-1) (exp.)0.6880.5130.6240.438qe (mg.g-1) (cal.)0.6130.4170.4280.356k1 (per min.)0.3530.0780.08020.160RMSE0.00140.00120.00140.0014P0.8231.4220.8171.76Pseudo second orderR20.990.990.990.99K2 (g. mg-1.Min-1)0.0710.0380.0510.036qe (mg.g-1) (exp.)0.6880.5130.6240.438qe (mg.g-1) (cal.)0.8440.4520.6050.427RMSE1.3910.0030.0040.006P-0.00020.9110.2280.184Figure16 graphically exhibits a nonlinear plot between (qt vs t), and the resulting calculated parameters are tabulated in Table 4. The correlation coefficients (R2) are close to unity and the rate of reaction (K1) for each CPWM, CPWC, PWM, and PWC which are 0.353, 0.0802, 0.078, and 0.160 (per minute). The calculated equilibrium adsorption capacity (qe, mg/g) differs from the experimental (qe, mg/g) in all acid-modified (CPWM, CPWC) and unmodified (PWM, and PWC) adsorbents, indicating that this kinetic model on equilibrium data is unsuitable for adsorptive removal of CGR.(2) Pseudo Second Order. Nonlinear relation of pseudo second order proposed by HO and McKay is depicted in the equation as follows [71, 72] and graphically in Figure 18. The effective parameters are tabulated in Table 4.
(14)qt=k2.qe2.t1+k2.qe.t,where qe is the equilibrium adsorption capacity (mg/g) and qt is the adsorption capacity (mg/g) at time (t) min-1 and K2 (g.mg-1.min-1) indicates the rate constant of experimental outcomes.Figure 18
Nonlinear pseudo second-order kinetic study.The calculated equilibrium adsorption capacity (qe) is nearly close to the experimental equilibrium adsorption capacity (qe), for the adsorption of CGR on CPWM, PWM, CPWC, and PWC, and is 0.84, 0.452, 0.61, and 0.43 mg/g, respectively, reflecting the fitness of pseudo second-order kinetics on equilibrium data of adsorption [73]. Furthermore, the correlation coefficients (R2) for adsorptive removal of dye molecules on all acid-modified and non-modified adsorbents are 0.99 close to unity and are listed in Table 4, indicating the well fitness of pseudo second order than the pseudo first-order kinetics mechanism.To assess the validity of equilibrium data, the root mean square errors for all cases of CGR adsorptive removal are determined using Equation (15) [74], and the percent relative deviation (P) values are calculated using Equation (16) [75] to assess the reliability of the adsorption findings tabulated in Table 4. The lowest values for both RMSE and P for second-order kinetics support its appropriateness and fitness over first-order kinetics [76].
(15)RMSE=∑qecal−qeexp2N,(16)P=100N∑qeexp−qecalqeexp.


## 3.6. Adsorption Thermodynamic Investigations

Nonlinear graphical representation of thermodynamic parameters such as enthalpy change, entropy change, Gibbs free energy, and activation energy was also investigated during experiments to authenticate and validate equilibrium data [77]. Temperature changes correlate with the diffusion, kinetic energy, and angular velocity of CGR in the aqueous phase. This property influences the efficiency of the adsorbents for the adsorption removal mechanism of Congo red dye molecules because of the pervious and rubbery, squishy, and porous surface of hemicellulose and adsorbent peels. The statistical results of the calculated thermodynamic parameters ∆G0, ∆H0, ∆S0, and ∆Ea by using Equations (17), (18), (19), and (20) are listed in Table 5 and are graphically represented in Figure 19.Table 5
Nonlinear comparative study of thermodynamic parameters.
Adsorption of CGR on adsorbentsT (K)KD∆G (kJ/Mol)∆H (kJ/Mol)∆S (J Mol-1 K-1)Ea (kJ/Mol)CGR on CPWM2980.004-13.73080.074-6.67-1454431453180.154-4.95CGR on PWM2980.05-7.43080.126-5.3-57168573180.214-4.1CGR on CPWC2980.027-8.953080.099-5.9-76225763180.183-4.5CGR on PWC2980.074-6.53080.154-4.83180.247-3.7-4813848Figure 19
Nonlinear adsorption thermodynamic approach.The Gibbs free energy calculated from Equation (17) [53], for the adsorption of CGR on chemically modified adsorbents CPWM (-13.7, -6.67, and -4.95 kJmol-1) and CPWC (-8.95, -5.9, and -4.5 kJmol-1), as compared to their unmodified forms, PWM (-7.4, -5.3, and -4.1 kJmol-1) and PWC (-6.5, -4.8, and -3.7 kJmol-1) at 298, 308, and 318 kelvin temperatures, respectively, suggests that the process is spontaneous in standard conditions. [67].
(17)ΔG0=−RTlnKD,(18)lnKD=∆S0R−∆H0RT,(19)KD=C₀−CeCe.The distribution coefficient (KD) was determined from the relation shown in Equation (19), where Co and Ce are the initial and equilibrium concentrations of CGR solutions, respectively, whereas R is the universal gas constant and T is the temperature in kelvin in Equation (17). The change in enthalpy (∆H0) varied between 2.1 and 20.9 kJmol-1, exhibiting physio-sorption, and from 80 to 200 kJmol-1, exhibiting chemisorption [78]. Therefore, exothermic enthalpy changes calculated from Equation (18), for adsorptive eradication of CGR on citric acid-processed biosorbents CPWM is (-145 kJmol-1) and on unprocessed PWM is (-57 kJmol-1), whereas on CPWC is (-76 kJmol-1) and on its raw form is (-48 kJmol-1) indicating the chemisorption adsorption mechanism. The higher the ∆H0 value for citric acid treated biosorbents in comparison to their raw peels reflecting the tighter adsorbate-adsorbent interactions at their surface interfaces, resulting in the efficient eradication of CGR from the water system. The contortion and deformation at the adsorbate-adsorbent interface associated with entropy change (∆S0) is also calculated from Equation (25) [79, 80]. High calculated ∆S0 for adsorptive removal of CGR by CPWM and CPWC is 443 and 225 Jmol-1 K-1, respectively, as compared to 168 Jmol-1 K-1 for PWM and 138 Jmol-1 K-1 for PWC, respectively, listed in Table 5.The increased energies of activation (∆Ea) calculated from Arrhenius Equation (20), for the removal of CGR from the aqueous environment on acid-treated CPWM and CPWC, are 145 and 76 kJmol-1, respectively, whereas on PWM and PWC are 57 and 48 kJmol-1, respectively, indicating the fast and efficient adsorptive removal of CGR on citric acid-treated adsorbents [81]. The adsorption capacity qmax of present investigation is compared with the previous reported data in Table 1.
(20)lnK=lnA−EaRT.


## 3.7. Adsorption Mechanism

Various new additionally provided functional groups including, -OH, –COOH, >C=O, NH2 on the surfaces interfaces of chemically modified adsorbents have been contributed a vital and central role in the adsorptive eradication of CGR from aqueous solutions [82, 83]. CGR, being an acidic as well as an anionic dye, was repelled by the anionic adsorption sites on adsorbents relatively at the high initial pH of the solutions. Protonation of adsorbents at pH 4-5 favors and influences the anionic molecules [CGR-] of dye propelled towards the active adsorbent sites of adsorbents, resulting in an increased rate of adsorption performance as schematically shown in Figure 20.Figure 20
Schematic mechanism of adsorption for CGR ((a) adsorption on untreated adsorbents and (b) adsorption on citric acid-treated adsorbents).
(a)(b)After the assessment and evaluation of numerous experimental results, it was concluded that the adsorption mechanism is primarily linked with both chemisorption and physio-sorption. Chemisorption is associated with chelation reactions between the amino groups (NH2) of CGR molecules and excessive as well as additionally provided carboxylic acid groups (COOH) to citric acid-treated adsorbents [84], whereas physio-sorption is linked with electrostatic interactions such as hydrogen bonding between >C=O of carboxylic acid moieties on adsorbents and partially positively charged hydrogen atoms (H-N-H) of CGR in aqueous solutions [85], as illustrated in the proposed mechanism in Figure 20.


## 3.8. Desorption

Desorption of CGR from exhausted adsorbents was conducted by using different eluents which have capability to break the adsorbate-adsorbent interactions for their further use and to assess the change in their adsorption performance. The most appropriate and promising desorbing agent, 0.1 M NaOH, has been used for CGR desorption from the used adsorbents [86], whereas the high concentration has been avoided because it could damage and degrade the alignment and crystalline structure of cellulosic biomasses, causing a drop in their adsorption performance [87]. The maximum desorption CGR recorded in this investigation was 87% for CPWM, 85% for CPWC, 80% for PWM, and 75% for PWC.Figure21 shows that the adsorptive performance of adsorbents decreased with an increase in the number of cycles for each adsorbent. Desorption of [CGR-] anions was greatly increased by the deprotonation of adsorbents in the pH range of 4–12, due to repulsion towards negatively binding sites of adsorbents by an ion exchange mechanism. The desorption capacity of both adsorbents and the percentage desorption of CGR were calculated from the following equations:
(21)qdesorptionmg.g−1=V×CdesorptionMassadsorbentg,Desorption%ofdyes=qdesorptionmg.g−1qadsorbedmg.g−1×100.Figure 21
Study of comparative recycling of adsorbents for the degradation of CGR.


## 4. Conclusion

The peels of watermelon (PWM) and water Chestnuts (PWC) were dried, sieved, and chemically modified with citric acid containing tricarboxylic groups for the adsorption eradication of harmful, venomous, unfriendly, lethal, and tragic, Congo red dyestuffs from the aqueous environment. In this study, the surface orientation of various functional groups and the crystallinity of the peels were evaluated through FT-IR and SEM characterizations. In comparison to the Freundlich statistical data, the Langmuir and Temkin models seem to be more suited for the adsorptive elimination of CGR from aqueous solutions. The correlation coefficients for nonlinear Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin isothermal studies are close to unity, 0.99 for adsorptive removal of CGR on each CPWM, PWM, CPWC, and PWC. Theqmax for nonlinear Langmuir isothermal studies for CPWM and CPWC are 8.3 and 7.95 mg/g, respectively, which are more effective as compared to 2.23 and 4.32 mg/g for their unmodified forms (PWM and PWC), respectively. However, more negative values for Gibbs free energy for acid-modified adsorbents reflect spontaneity, homogeneous, and monolayer adsorption mechanisms. The greater values of BT, 1.4 and 1.3 J/mole, for adsorptive removal of dye on CPWM and CPWC, respectively, as compared to their unmodified forms, PWM and PWC, which are 0.53 and 0.55 J/mole, respectively, indicate the stronger adsorbate-adsorbent associations. The adsorption mechanism follows pseudo second-order kinetics as the differences between calculated and experimental qe (mg/g) are negligible for the adsorptive removal of CGR on CPWM, CPWC, PWM, and PWC, indicating the better fitness of equilibrium data in pseudo second-order kinetics than in first-order mechanism. Moreover, the lowest values for both RMSE and P for second-order kinetics support its suitability and acceptability over first-order kinetics. The calculated ΔH0 for CPWM and CPWC is -145 and -76 kJ/mole, respectively, as compared to PWM and PWC at -57 and -48 kJ/mole, reflecting the stronger adsorbate and adsorbent interactions as well as an exothermic adsorption mechanism. These findings suggest that the CPWM and CPWC adsorbents, which have been treated with citric acid, might be used effectively to remove Congo red dye from wastewater.



---

*Source: 9056288-2022-08-08.xml*