# Tinctoride A, a New Hopan-Type Triterpenoic Peracid from the Thallus of LichenParmotrema Tinctorum (Despr. ex Nyl.) Hale

Authors: Le-Thuy-Thuy-Trang Hoang; Thanh-Nha Tran; Thi-Phi-Giao Vo; Hoang-Vinh-Truong Phan; Phan-Si-Nguyen Dong; Dinh-Tri Mai; Ngoc-An Nguyen; Thi-Minh-Suong Huynh; Hong Truong Luu; Tien-Dung Le; Minh-Trung Dao; Van-Kieu Nguyen
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

A new hopan-type triterpenoic peracid, tinctoride A (1), together with three known compounds, zeorin (2), 6β,22-dihydroxyhopane (3), and ergosterol peroxide (4), was isolated from Parmotrema tinctorum (Despr. ex Nyl.) Hale. Their chemical structures were identified by extensive 1D and 2D NMR analysis and high-resolution mass spectroscopy and compared with those reported in the literature. The enzyme inhibitory potential of compounds 1–3 against α-glucosidase was investigated, exhibiting nil to weak inhibitory activity.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Lichens, which are symbiotic organisms having the characteristics of mycobionts and fungi, comprise 17,000 species distributed from tropical to polar regions [1–3]. This unique ability produces various chemical constituents that are found in most of these organisms [4]. Previous chemical investigations of lichens have confirmed the presence of many kinds of aromatic secondary metabolites, such as depsides, depsidones, dibenzofuranes, xanthones, and anthraquinones [5]. Most of these compounds are unique to lichens, but some can also be obtained from fungi and plants [2]. Biological markers have indicated that lichens have potent antioxidant, anticancer, antiarthritic, anti-inflammatory, antihuman immunodeficiency virus (anti-HIV), and antiherpes simplex virus 1 (anti-HSV-1) activities [4, 5].Parmotrema tinctorum (Despr. ex Nyl.) Hale (Parmeliaceae) (lichenised Ascomycota) is a foliose lichen growing abundantly in various countries, commonly on rocks and trees in moist tropical and temperate areas [6, 7]. The extract of P. tinctorum exhibits significant α-glucosidase, α-amylase, and aldose reductase inhibition [7], and some isolated compounds manifest moderate in advanced glycation end product formation inhibition activities [8]. However, only a few publications have reported the chemical investigation of P. tinctorum, resulting in the isolation of some monoaromatic and aromatic compounds [8–12].The present paper reports the results of the isolation and elucidation of a new triterpenoid (1) and three known compounds (2-4) fromP. tinctorum. Moreover, the enzyme inhibitory activity of compounds 1-3 against α-glucosidase is described.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. General Experimental Procedure

Column chromatography (CC) was performed on 60–120-mesh silica gel. The IR spectra were measured on Frontier FTIR/NIR spectrometers (Perkin Elmer, USA). NMR spectra (1D and 2D) were recorded on a Bruker Avance spectrometer at 500 MHz for1H NMR and 125 MHz for 13C NMR. HRESIMS were recorded on a Bruker MicrOTOF-Q II mass spectrometer. Thin-layer chromatography was carried out on precoated Kieselgel 60 F254 or silica gel 60 RP-18 F254S (Merck). Spots were visualized by spraying with 5% vanillin in acidic aqueous solution, followed by heating.


### 2.2. Plant Material

The thalli of lichenP. tinctorum were collected in the Lam Dong province of Vietnam in May 2020. The scientific name of the plant was identified by Dr. Vo Thi Phi Giao, Faculty of Biology-Biotechnology, University of Science, National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. A voucher specimen PHH0011338 was deposited in the Herbarium of the University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City Vietnam National University (PHH).


### 2.3. Isolation and Purification

The air-dried roots (2.5 kg) were extracted exhaustively with ethyl acetate (10L×3) and methanol (10L×3) at room temperature. The filtered solution was evaporated under reduced pressure to afford two crudes: E (105.2 g) and M (135.5 g). Crude E was washed with ethyl acetate to yield the liquid EL (23.5 g) and precipitate EP (75.8 g). EL was applied to Sephadex LH-20 and eluted with methanol to obtain EL1–3, and EL2 was then fractionated using C-18 silica gel CC with a gradient system of water-methanol (1 : 8), affording five fractions (EL2A–E). Fraction EL2D (16.6 g) was selected for further fractionation by silica gel CC, using a solvent system consisting of n-hexane/CHCl3/ethyl acetate/acetone (4 : 0.2 : 0.2 : 0.2) to afford fractions EL2D1–D5. Subfraction EL2D3 (1.43 g) was rechromatographed by silica gel CC using an n-hexane/CHCl3/ethyl acetate/acetone (5 : 0.2 : 0.2 : 0.2) solvent system, affording compounds 1 (1.6 mg) and 4 (25.0 mg). Fraction EL2D1 (0.63 g) was rechromatographed to afford compounds 2 (3.2 mg) and 3 (5.2 mg), by the same procedure used for EL2D3.


#### 2.3.1. Tinctoride

A (1). Colorless gum; IR (KBr, cm−1): 3564, 2925, 2849, 1739, 1709, 1459, 1374, 1247, 1032; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δH 4.66 (1H, dd, J=4.8, 11.6 Hz, H-1), 4.58 (1H, dd, J=4.4, 12.4 Hz, H-3), 2.36 (1H, m, H-21), 2.33 (1H, m, H-22), 2.02 (3H, s, H-34), 1.97 (3H, s, H-32), 1.89 (1H, m, H-2a), 1.86 (1H, m, H-20a), 1.66 (1H, m, H-2b), 1.62 (1H, m, H-20a), 1.54 (2H, m, H-6), 1.52 (1H, m, H-19a), 1.48 (2H, m, H-16), 1.47 (2H, m, H-9, H-12a), 1.45 (1H, m, H-11a), 1.43 (1H, m, H-20a), 1.40 (1H, m, H-7a), 1.32 (2H, m, H-12b, H-13), 1.31 (2H, m, H-15), 1.30 (1H, m, H-11b), 1.23 (1H, m, H-17), 1.20 (1H, m, H-7b), 1.13 (3H, d, J=6.4 Hz, H-29), 1.00 (3H, s, H-25), 0.94 (3H, s, H-26), 0.90 (3H, s, H-27), 0.89 (1H, m, H-19b), 0.83 (6H, s, H-23, H-24), 0.75 (1H, d, J=2.8, 11.2 Hz, H-5), 0.70 (3H, s, H-28); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δC 182.0 (C-30), 170.5 (C-33), 170.3 (C-31), 80.5 (C-1), 76.5 (C-3), 53.8 (C-17), 52.9 (C-5), 50.8 (C-9), 48.7 (C-13), 44.4 (C-18), 42.7 (C-21), 42.3 (C-22), 42.3 (C-8), 42.1 (C-14), 42.1 (C-10), 41.0 (C-19), 37.9 (C-4), 33.5 (C-15), 33.1 (C-7), 30.1 (C-2), 28.0 (C-23), 26.7 (C-20), 23.9 (C-12), 23.0 (C-11), 21.9 (C-34), 21.2 (C-32), 19.9 (C-16), 17.9 (C-6), 17.8 (C-29), 17.0 (C-26), 16.7 (C-27), 16.2 (C-24), 15.8 (C-28), 13.0 (C-25); HRESIMS m/z: [M + Na]+597.3794 for C34H54O7Na (calcd. 597.3767).


### 2.4.α-Glucosidase Activity Test

Theα-glucosidase inhibitory activity of the compounds was investigated using a method from Wan et al. [13]. All samples were examined in triplicate at different concentrations to obtain the IC50 value of each compound. The mean values and standard deviations were retained. Briefly, 120 μL of extract were preincubated with 20 μL of α-glucosidase (1 unit/mL) in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) at 37°C for 15 min. The reaction was then initiated by adding 20 μL of 5 mM para-nitrophenyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (PNPG) in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, and the mixture was further incubated for 15 min. The reaction was terminated by the addition of 80 μL of 0.2 M Na2CO3 in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, and the absorbance of the mixture was recorded at 405 nm. The results were expressed as % inhibition of enzyme activity and calculated according to the following equation:
(1)Inhibition%=1–AsampleAcontrol×100.


## 2.1. General Experimental Procedure

Column chromatography (CC) was performed on 60–120-mesh silica gel. The IR spectra were measured on Frontier FTIR/NIR spectrometers (Perkin Elmer, USA). NMR spectra (1D and 2D) were recorded on a Bruker Avance spectrometer at 500 MHz for1H NMR and 125 MHz for 13C NMR. HRESIMS were recorded on a Bruker MicrOTOF-Q II mass spectrometer. Thin-layer chromatography was carried out on precoated Kieselgel 60 F254 or silica gel 60 RP-18 F254S (Merck). Spots were visualized by spraying with 5% vanillin in acidic aqueous solution, followed by heating.


## 2.2. Plant Material

The thalli of lichenP. tinctorum were collected in the Lam Dong province of Vietnam in May 2020. The scientific name of the plant was identified by Dr. Vo Thi Phi Giao, Faculty of Biology-Biotechnology, University of Science, National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. A voucher specimen PHH0011338 was deposited in the Herbarium of the University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City Vietnam National University (PHH).


## 2.3. Isolation and Purification

The air-dried roots (2.5 kg) were extracted exhaustively with ethyl acetate (10L×3) and methanol (10L×3) at room temperature. The filtered solution was evaporated under reduced pressure to afford two crudes: E (105.2 g) and M (135.5 g). Crude E was washed with ethyl acetate to yield the liquid EL (23.5 g) and precipitate EP (75.8 g). EL was applied to Sephadex LH-20 and eluted with methanol to obtain EL1–3, and EL2 was then fractionated using C-18 silica gel CC with a gradient system of water-methanol (1 : 8), affording five fractions (EL2A–E). Fraction EL2D (16.6 g) was selected for further fractionation by silica gel CC, using a solvent system consisting of n-hexane/CHCl3/ethyl acetate/acetone (4 : 0.2 : 0.2 : 0.2) to afford fractions EL2D1–D5. Subfraction EL2D3 (1.43 g) was rechromatographed by silica gel CC using an n-hexane/CHCl3/ethyl acetate/acetone (5 : 0.2 : 0.2 : 0.2) solvent system, affording compounds 1 (1.6 mg) and 4 (25.0 mg). Fraction EL2D1 (0.63 g) was rechromatographed to afford compounds 2 (3.2 mg) and 3 (5.2 mg), by the same procedure used for EL2D3.


### 2.3.1. Tinctoride

A (1). Colorless gum; IR (KBr, cm−1): 3564, 2925, 2849, 1739, 1709, 1459, 1374, 1247, 1032; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δH 4.66 (1H, dd, J=4.8, 11.6 Hz, H-1), 4.58 (1H, dd, J=4.4, 12.4 Hz, H-3), 2.36 (1H, m, H-21), 2.33 (1H, m, H-22), 2.02 (3H, s, H-34), 1.97 (3H, s, H-32), 1.89 (1H, m, H-2a), 1.86 (1H, m, H-20a), 1.66 (1H, m, H-2b), 1.62 (1H, m, H-20a), 1.54 (2H, m, H-6), 1.52 (1H, m, H-19a), 1.48 (2H, m, H-16), 1.47 (2H, m, H-9, H-12a), 1.45 (1H, m, H-11a), 1.43 (1H, m, H-20a), 1.40 (1H, m, H-7a), 1.32 (2H, m, H-12b, H-13), 1.31 (2H, m, H-15), 1.30 (1H, m, H-11b), 1.23 (1H, m, H-17), 1.20 (1H, m, H-7b), 1.13 (3H, d, J=6.4 Hz, H-29), 1.00 (3H, s, H-25), 0.94 (3H, s, H-26), 0.90 (3H, s, H-27), 0.89 (1H, m, H-19b), 0.83 (6H, s, H-23, H-24), 0.75 (1H, d, J=2.8, 11.2 Hz, H-5), 0.70 (3H, s, H-28); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δC 182.0 (C-30), 170.5 (C-33), 170.3 (C-31), 80.5 (C-1), 76.5 (C-3), 53.8 (C-17), 52.9 (C-5), 50.8 (C-9), 48.7 (C-13), 44.4 (C-18), 42.7 (C-21), 42.3 (C-22), 42.3 (C-8), 42.1 (C-14), 42.1 (C-10), 41.0 (C-19), 37.9 (C-4), 33.5 (C-15), 33.1 (C-7), 30.1 (C-2), 28.0 (C-23), 26.7 (C-20), 23.9 (C-12), 23.0 (C-11), 21.9 (C-34), 21.2 (C-32), 19.9 (C-16), 17.9 (C-6), 17.8 (C-29), 17.0 (C-26), 16.7 (C-27), 16.2 (C-24), 15.8 (C-28), 13.0 (C-25); HRESIMS m/z: [M + Na]+597.3794 for C34H54O7Na (calcd. 597.3767).


## 2.3.1. Tinctoride

A (1). Colorless gum; IR (KBr, cm−1): 3564, 2925, 2849, 1739, 1709, 1459, 1374, 1247, 1032; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δH 4.66 (1H, dd, J=4.8, 11.6 Hz, H-1), 4.58 (1H, dd, J=4.4, 12.4 Hz, H-3), 2.36 (1H, m, H-21), 2.33 (1H, m, H-22), 2.02 (3H, s, H-34), 1.97 (3H, s, H-32), 1.89 (1H, m, H-2a), 1.86 (1H, m, H-20a), 1.66 (1H, m, H-2b), 1.62 (1H, m, H-20a), 1.54 (2H, m, H-6), 1.52 (1H, m, H-19a), 1.48 (2H, m, H-16), 1.47 (2H, m, H-9, H-12a), 1.45 (1H, m, H-11a), 1.43 (1H, m, H-20a), 1.40 (1H, m, H-7a), 1.32 (2H, m, H-12b, H-13), 1.31 (2H, m, H-15), 1.30 (1H, m, H-11b), 1.23 (1H, m, H-17), 1.20 (1H, m, H-7b), 1.13 (3H, d, J=6.4 Hz, H-29), 1.00 (3H, s, H-25), 0.94 (3H, s, H-26), 0.90 (3H, s, H-27), 0.89 (1H, m, H-19b), 0.83 (6H, s, H-23, H-24), 0.75 (1H, d, J=2.8, 11.2 Hz, H-5), 0.70 (3H, s, H-28); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δC 182.0 (C-30), 170.5 (C-33), 170.3 (C-31), 80.5 (C-1), 76.5 (C-3), 53.8 (C-17), 52.9 (C-5), 50.8 (C-9), 48.7 (C-13), 44.4 (C-18), 42.7 (C-21), 42.3 (C-22), 42.3 (C-8), 42.1 (C-14), 42.1 (C-10), 41.0 (C-19), 37.9 (C-4), 33.5 (C-15), 33.1 (C-7), 30.1 (C-2), 28.0 (C-23), 26.7 (C-20), 23.9 (C-12), 23.0 (C-11), 21.9 (C-34), 21.2 (C-32), 19.9 (C-16), 17.9 (C-6), 17.8 (C-29), 17.0 (C-26), 16.7 (C-27), 16.2 (C-24), 15.8 (C-28), 13.0 (C-25); HRESIMS m/z: [M + Na]+597.3794 for C34H54O7Na (calcd. 597.3767).


## 2.4.α-Glucosidase Activity Test

Theα-glucosidase inhibitory activity of the compounds was investigated using a method from Wan et al. [13]. All samples were examined in triplicate at different concentrations to obtain the IC50 value of each compound. The mean values and standard deviations were retained. Briefly, 120 μL of extract were preincubated with 20 μL of α-glucosidase (1 unit/mL) in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) at 37°C for 15 min. The reaction was then initiated by adding 20 μL of 5 mM para-nitrophenyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (PNPG) in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, and the mixture was further incubated for 15 min. The reaction was terminated by the addition of 80 μL of 0.2 M Na2CO3 in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, and the absorbance of the mixture was recorded at 405 nm. The results were expressed as % inhibition of enzyme activity and calculated according to the following equation:
(1)Inhibition%=1–AsampleAcontrol×100.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Structural Elucidation

The ethyl acetate extract ofP. tinctorum was separated by CC over silica gel normal phase and reversed-phase RP C-18, and sephadex LH-20 to afford a new triterpene, tinctoride A (1), and three known compounds, zeorin (2) [14], 6β,22-dihydroxyhopane (3) [15], and ergosterol peroxide (4) [16] (Figure 1).Figure 1
Chemical structure of compounds 1-4.Compound 1 was purified as a colorless gum with molecular formula C34H54O7, as assumed by the sodiated molecular ion peak at m/z 597.3794 (calcd. for C34H54O7 + Na, 597.3767) on the HRESI mass spectrum. The 13C NMR and HSQC spectra of 1 revealed 34 carbon signals, including 9 methyl, 9 methylene, 8 methine, and 8 quaternary carbons. In addition, the 1H NMR spectrum showed six singlets (δH 1.00, 0.94, 0.90, 0.83×2, 0.70) and one doublet (δH 1.13, d, 6.4), and the key HMBC correlations were observed from six methyl groups, H3-23 (δH 0.83), H3-24 (δH 0.83), H3-25 (δH 1.00), H3-26 (δH 0.94), H3-27 (δH 0.90), and H3-28 (δH 0.70), to their attached quaternary carbons C-4 (δC 37.9), C-4, C-10, C-8 (δC 42.3), C-14 (δC 42.1), and C-18 (δC 44.4), respectively, suggesting that 1 was a hopan-type triterpenoid [17], related to the known cometabolites 2, 3. In addition, the HMBC correlations from the methyl protons at δH 2.02 (H3-34) to C-33 (δC 170.5) and δH 1.97 (H3-32) to C-31 (δC 170.3) suggested the occurrence of two acetoxycarbonyl groups located at C-1 and C-3, respectively, which was further backed up by the HMBC crosspeak of the oxymethine proton H-1 (δH 4.66) to C-31 and H-3 (δH 4.58) to C-33. Furthermore, the key HMBC of the doublet methyl H3-29 (δH 1.13, d, J=6.4 Hz) to C-21 (δC 42.7), C-22 (δC 42.3), and C-30 (δC 182.0) indicated that a methyl group belonging to the isopropyl moiety located at C-21 (ring E) was oxidated to a carboxyl function (Supplementary material Figure S1). The FTIR spectrum of compound 1 also revealed the presence of free OH, OH stretching, C=O stretching, and OH bending vibrations of the peracid functional group at 3564, 3293, 1739, and 1459 cm–1, respectively [18], indicating a peracid moiety located at C-30, which was further clearly evidenced by the value of its chemical shift at δC 182.0, instead of approximately 184 ppm in the case of an acid function [15], and also by the molecular formula C34H54O7 from the HRESI mass spectrum. In addition, the chromatography experiment between 1 and the crude fraction revealed that 1 was a minor substance in P. tinctorum (Supplementary material Figure S2).As to the relative stereochemistry of C-1 and C-3, the elevated coupling constant of H-1 (JH−1,H−2=11.6, 4.8 Hz) and H-3 (JH−2,H−3=12.4, 4.4 Hz) determined the axial position of both of these oxymethine protons. Furthermore, the syn-orientation (β-orientation) of H-1 (δH 4.66), H-3 (δH 4.58), and H-5 (δH 0.75) was definitely indicated by pair-to-pair NOESY interactions (Supplementary material Figure S1). From all the above data, compound 1, namely, tinctoride A, was readily elucidated as 1β,3β-diacetoxy-21α-hopan-29-oic peracid.


### 3.2.α-Glucosidase Inhibition Assay

The enzyme inhibition of compounds 1-3 againstα-glucosidase was evaluated (Supplementary material Table S1). Triterpenoids 1–3 exhibited weak (compound 2, IC50 258.87 μM) or no (compounds 1 and 3) α-glucosidase inhibitory activity compared with acarbose (positive control, IC50 108.08 μM). Among these compounds, 2 showed the highest α-glucosidase inhibitory activity, similar to that reported in the previous study [19], while the 6β-OH orientation of compound 3 led to a decrease in its α-glucosidase inhibitory activity, in spite of its molecular formula being closely related to compound 2. It is worth noting that the stereochemistry of C-6 hydroxyl substitutions in hopan-type triterpenoids could play an important role in their α-glucosidase inhibitory activities. The extract of P. tinctorum, however, displayed significant α-glucosidase inhibition [7], which indicates that the hopan-type triterpenoids are not the most potent α-glucosidase inhibitory component in the ethyl acetate fraction of P. tinctorum. Due to the reports of various phenolic compounds [6, 8, 9, 11, 12], further isolation of other compounds from the ethyl acetate fraction, such as phenolic compounds or other types of triterpenoids, will be important research for the discovery of active compounds against α-glucosidase.


## 3.1. Structural Elucidation

The ethyl acetate extract ofP. tinctorum was separated by CC over silica gel normal phase and reversed-phase RP C-18, and sephadex LH-20 to afford a new triterpene, tinctoride A (1), and three known compounds, zeorin (2) [14], 6β,22-dihydroxyhopane (3) [15], and ergosterol peroxide (4) [16] (Figure 1).Figure 1
Chemical structure of compounds 1-4.Compound 1 was purified as a colorless gum with molecular formula C34H54O7, as assumed by the sodiated molecular ion peak at m/z 597.3794 (calcd. for C34H54O7 + Na, 597.3767) on the HRESI mass spectrum. The 13C NMR and HSQC spectra of 1 revealed 34 carbon signals, including 9 methyl, 9 methylene, 8 methine, and 8 quaternary carbons. In addition, the 1H NMR spectrum showed six singlets (δH 1.00, 0.94, 0.90, 0.83×2, 0.70) and one doublet (δH 1.13, d, 6.4), and the key HMBC correlations were observed from six methyl groups, H3-23 (δH 0.83), H3-24 (δH 0.83), H3-25 (δH 1.00), H3-26 (δH 0.94), H3-27 (δH 0.90), and H3-28 (δH 0.70), to their attached quaternary carbons C-4 (δC 37.9), C-4, C-10, C-8 (δC 42.3), C-14 (δC 42.1), and C-18 (δC 44.4), respectively, suggesting that 1 was a hopan-type triterpenoid [17], related to the known cometabolites 2, 3. In addition, the HMBC correlations from the methyl protons at δH 2.02 (H3-34) to C-33 (δC 170.5) and δH 1.97 (H3-32) to C-31 (δC 170.3) suggested the occurrence of two acetoxycarbonyl groups located at C-1 and C-3, respectively, which was further backed up by the HMBC crosspeak of the oxymethine proton H-1 (δH 4.66) to C-31 and H-3 (δH 4.58) to C-33. Furthermore, the key HMBC of the doublet methyl H3-29 (δH 1.13, d, J=6.4 Hz) to C-21 (δC 42.7), C-22 (δC 42.3), and C-30 (δC 182.0) indicated that a methyl group belonging to the isopropyl moiety located at C-21 (ring E) was oxidated to a carboxyl function (Supplementary material Figure S1). The FTIR spectrum of compound 1 also revealed the presence of free OH, OH stretching, C=O stretching, and OH bending vibrations of the peracid functional group at 3564, 3293, 1739, and 1459 cm–1, respectively [18], indicating a peracid moiety located at C-30, which was further clearly evidenced by the value of its chemical shift at δC 182.0, instead of approximately 184 ppm in the case of an acid function [15], and also by the molecular formula C34H54O7 from the HRESI mass spectrum. In addition, the chromatography experiment between 1 and the crude fraction revealed that 1 was a minor substance in P. tinctorum (Supplementary material Figure S2).As to the relative stereochemistry of C-1 and C-3, the elevated coupling constant of H-1 (JH−1,H−2=11.6, 4.8 Hz) and H-3 (JH−2,H−3=12.4, 4.4 Hz) determined the axial position of both of these oxymethine protons. Furthermore, the syn-orientation (β-orientation) of H-1 (δH 4.66), H-3 (δH 4.58), and H-5 (δH 0.75) was definitely indicated by pair-to-pair NOESY interactions (Supplementary material Figure S1). From all the above data, compound 1, namely, tinctoride A, was readily elucidated as 1β,3β-diacetoxy-21α-hopan-29-oic peracid.


## 3.2.α-Glucosidase Inhibition Assay

The enzyme inhibition of compounds 1-3 againstα-glucosidase was evaluated (Supplementary material Table S1). Triterpenoids 1–3 exhibited weak (compound 2, IC50 258.87 μM) or no (compounds 1 and 3) α-glucosidase inhibitory activity compared with acarbose (positive control, IC50 108.08 μM). Among these compounds, 2 showed the highest α-glucosidase inhibitory activity, similar to that reported in the previous study [19], while the 6β-OH orientation of compound 3 led to a decrease in its α-glucosidase inhibitory activity, in spite of its molecular formula being closely related to compound 2. It is worth noting that the stereochemistry of C-6 hydroxyl substitutions in hopan-type triterpenoids could play an important role in their α-glucosidase inhibitory activities. The extract of P. tinctorum, however, displayed significant α-glucosidase inhibition [7], which indicates that the hopan-type triterpenoids are not the most potent α-glucosidase inhibitory component in the ethyl acetate fraction of P. tinctorum. Due to the reports of various phenolic compounds [6, 8, 9, 11, 12], further isolation of other compounds from the ethyl acetate fraction, such as phenolic compounds or other types of triterpenoids, will be important research for the discovery of active compounds against α-glucosidase.


## 4. Conclusions

Three hopan-type terpenoids, including one new peracid, tinctoride A, and two known compounds, zeorin (2) and 6β,22-dihydroxyhopane (3), together with ergosterol peroxide (4), were isolated from the lichen P. tinctorum. Their chemical structures were identified by extensive 1D and 2D NMR analysis and high-resolution mass spectroscopy and compared with those reported in the literature. To the best of our knowledge, compound 1 is a new peracid, while compounds 2–4 have not previously been isolated from P. tinctorum. Compounds 1-3 displayed nil or weak inhibitory activity against α-glucosidase.



---

*Source: 9092098-2022-04-11.xml*