# Environmental Perception and Sensor Data Fusion for Unmanned Ground Vehicle

Authors: Yibing Zhao; Jining Li; Linhui Li; Mingheng Zhang; Lie Guo
Journal: Mathematical Problems in Engineering
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs) that can drive autonomously in cross-country environment have received a good deal of attention in recent years. They must have the ability to determine whether the current terrain is traversable or not by using onboard sensors. This paper explores new methods related to environment perception based on computer image processing, pattern recognition, multisensors data fusion, and multidisciplinary theory. Kalman filter is used for low-level fusion of physical level, thus using the D-S evidence theory for high-level data fusion. Probability Test and Gaussian Mixture Model are proposed to obtain the traversable region in the forward-facing camera view for UGV. One feature set including color and texture information is extracted from areas of interest and combined with a classifier approach to resolve two types of terrain (traversable or not). Also, three-dimension data are employed; the feature set contains components such as distance contrast of three-dimension data, edge chain-code curvature of camera image, and covariance matrix based on the principal component method. This paper puts forward one new method that is suitable for distributing basic probability assignment (BPA), based on which D-S theory of evidence is employed to integrate sensors information and recognize the obstacle. The subordination obtained by using the fuzzy interpolation is applied to calculate the basic probability assignment. It is supposed that the subordination is equal to correlation coefficient in the formula. More accurate results of object identification are achieved by using the D-S theory of evidence. Control on motion behavior or autonomous navigation for UGV is based on the method, which is necessary for UGV high speed driving in cross-country environment. The experiment results have demonstrated the viability of the new method.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Due to the special value of military, the developed countries have researched autonomous driving car since the 1970s. At present, the United States, Germany, and Italy stand for the forefront of feasibility and practical application aspects. In 2000, the plan named Demo III of USA mainly developed the technology which was based on stereovision environment perception. Thus no matter in the day or night the Unmanned Ground Vehicles can achieve higher speed in the complex cross-country environment [1]. The key technology of this research program focuses on how to improve the ability of obstacle’s classification, for instance, how to classify bushes, rocks, grass, and water region for UGV’s automatic identification, which is playing significantly important role in the development of military utility in the future. As a matter of fact, the speed of autonomous vehicles is seriously restricted, since three-dimensional point cloud data acquisition and features matching are fairly sluggish based on stereovision. In 2007, the United States DARPA held a named “urban challenge” grand prix in Los Angeles. All autonomous driving vehicles were required to avoid obstacles, obey the traffic signal, and integrate the general traffic in the urban environment. Also, autonomous driving vehicles can automatically avoid other vehicles in this journey of 96 km—long urban model. Finally six vehicles arrived at the end point [2]. In 2009 the United States Jet Propulsion Laboratory announced obstacle detection including trunks, branches, excessive slope, negative obstacle, and water region only based on stereovision. According to each stereovision image it established a simple map, and the tag unit of the map showed the non traversable area where obstacles exist. Also the terrain height, terrain classification, and terrain roughness were showed there. As an additional part, the terrain passing ability and the traversable value of the map were computed [3]. In July 2010, led by Professor Alberto Broggi from the University of Parma, the autonomous driving team started from Italy, lasted for 98 days, and fulfilled the journey of 13000 kilometers. They withstood mountain, desert, blizzard, and other tests, arrived in EU Pavilion at Shanghai World Expo safely. This verified how the humans use their own efforts in innovation to make the ideal named “city better life” into reality step by step. So, the technology of cross-country environment perception has made great progress in foreign developed countries [4]. It is necessary for us to fulfill this research results with independent intellectual property rights in the cross-country environment. The key technology of autonomous navigation contains environmental perception, path planning, and motion control. We should carry out some deep discussion and extensive research immediately.Liu Chunfang, a master of Jilin University, proposed to use texture analysis method for the identification of typically simple slope obstacles in cross-country environment and tell the inclination information about slope in April 2008 [5]. But the types of slope are various in cross-country environment and the texture characteristics are fairly different. Therefore, based on the method, the identification of slope obstacles robustness needs further discussion. Cong et al. extracted the MGD from the V-disparity image based on maximum energy method and then used the coarse-to-fine idea to detect the obstacle and help decide whether the UGV can avoid the obstacle in unstructured environment [6]. In order to make the UGV more suitable for more complex terrains, the obstacle detection algorithm should be improved in the future, as such, the laser sensor data may be integrated with the vision information. Wang et al. put forward one new segmentation method to identify the object based on color and texture features in complex background with green trees. Color images can be expressed in various color spaces. Therefore, segmentation based on color image can overcome some shortcomings of gray-scale image [7]. Hu and Wu suggested to integrate the restrictions of height, continuity and slope information. They used region growing method to detect the obstacles from the disparity image correctly and robustly, which contributed to avoid the interference of the noise [8]. Iyidir et al. raised an adaptive obstacle detection method based on monocular color vision and an ultrasonic distance sensor. This vision-based obstacle detection algorithm comes from a powerful background subtraction algorithm: visual background extractor (ViBe) [9].Also China held intelligent vehicle competitions in Xian in 2009 and in 2010 separately. Many teams participated including National University of Defense Technology, Tsinghua University, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Hunan University, Wuhan University, The Academy of Armored Forces Engineering, Hefei Institute of Physical Science CAS, Institute of Military Traffic, and Institute of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. Each of the participating team suffered from double test named “basic ability test” and “complex” comprehensive environmental test in the match which last for three days. The basic abilities included traffic sign recognition, driving around the curve corners, and driving ability of assigned point parking basic autonomous. However, the complex environment comprehensive test mainly represents the ability of autonomous driving vehicle in athletic process, which includes identification of traffic signs, integrating control of motor vehicles, and the ability of using the signal light device correctly, even more, telling road traffic situation comprehensively, and deciding whether to go ahead or not [10].From 31 October to 1 November, the “Future Challenge 2012” was successfully held in Ongniud Banner, Chifeng City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. The competition brings 14 vehicle fleets together from 12 domestic universities and scientific research institutions, not including another 6 vehicles working as judges and providing technologic support. The competition journey contains 6.9-kilometer-long city road in Ongniud Banner and 16-kilometer-long sections in Yu Long Sha Lake countryside road with two sections, which is mainly used to carry on unmanned vehicles safety maintenance [11].Actually, most of UGV research still suffers from some difficulties in practical applications, such as complex calculation and object detection. In this paper another approach, D-S evidence theory, is employed to distinguish objects efficiently and reduce the computational complexity. The environment perception system of Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs) can perceive hazardous region and recognize the obstacle. On the whole, Kalman filter is used for low-level fusion of physical level, thus using the D-S evidence theory for high-level data fusion. The purpose of the low-level information fusion is unifying the characteristics of the sensor data to the framework of information fusion system and integrating these features to generate more precise and detailed information characteristics. The most important bright spots of D-S theory is that the model is designed to cope with varying levels of precision and no further assumptions are needed. It also allows for the direct representation of system uncertainty where an imprecise input can be characterized by a set or an interval and the output result is also a set or an interval [12, 13].This paper is organized as follows. Section2 introduces the hardware description. Section 3 shows information related to sensor data procession. Section 4 presents data information of fusion and focuses on the calculation method of BPA mass value including algorithm preparation and correlation coefficient calculation. Sections 5 and 6 have the results and conclusions.


## 2. Hardware Description

Unmanned Ground Vehicle of DLUT is refitted from New Concept Vehicle of Cherry. A platform is provided above the panel roof to mount perception sensors. In order to achieve the autonomous navigation, we add the general electric 24 volt-DC motor for the brake and steering system, respectively, and control accelerator system by using stepping motor. Color and analog FLIR cameras are used for estimating terrain composition. All of those hardware tools utilize the same autonomous computing unit lying in the UGV. A national inertial navigation system MIN-900-3D and GPS DH2000e receiver provide global position estimation. Data from an inertial measurement unit (IMU) and differential global position system (DGPS) is combined to provide absolute positioning accurate within 1.5% of distance. Power is provided by 12-volt-DC batteries group.The DLUT environment perception system consists of two AVT F-033B/C color cameras mounted to camera brackets, one real-time laser radar (SICK-221), one American UNIQ USS-301 infrared camera, and one ADVANTECH IPC-610H industrial PC. The camera brackets are equipped to the UGV’s top mounting platform with shims that provided a 10° down tilt. Laser radar is mounted to the bumper with horizontal forward-looking scanning field of view. Figure1 shows a picture of the UGV’s perception system and other refitted systems mounted to the New Concept Vehicle of Cherry.Figure 1
The UGV’s perception system and other refitted systems.


## 3. Sensor Data Precession

Specifically speaking, in order to avoid obstacles safely, UGV must be able to accurately detect the terrain, that is, impenetrable region and autonomous parking within particular safety range, and then take appropriate intervention driving behavior. The UGV’s environment perception system should recognize and classify the possible obstacles in advance since the UGVs are normally faster. Laser sensor is used for obstacle avoidance, when UGV is driving at middle or low speed. The laser sensor is angled downward to scan the terrain in front of the vehicle as it moves. The UGV possesses a 3D point cloud over time acquired by laser sensor, and the point cloud is analyzed for drivable terrain and potential obstacles. By adjusting the initial angle of laser scanning and the resolution of point cloud data that are collected, it can be estimated that the maximum effective range for detecting obstacles in each laser image is about 14 meters, which is sufficient to real-time obstacle avoidance with the speed of 20 km/h. The collecting speed of laser data with image is fairly slow. To make up the problem, color camera is used for detecting the traversable region within the range of 14 meters, instead of applying the laser range data. Thus, UGV can quickly detect obstacles and probably walk around at the speed of 36 km/h when there are no obstacles. It is different from the general image understanding problem, because the common image processing method does not obtain 3D data set information belonging to the closer travelable region based on laser sensor. The UGV from DLUT employs the Probability Test to analyze the traversable region based on laser data and then detects the corresponding traversable terrain nearby by means of mapping the traversable surface into the camera image. Adaptive visual algorithm is explained by the Gaussian Mixture Model based on the color information of traversable region. All the image pixels within the closer region of traversable surface are used for the training samples. Then, the trained Gaussian Mixture Model is used to analyze the coming camera images. Once the camera image is classified, it will be mapped into the corresponding 2D map from the laser data information. Meanwhile, another benefit is that the scope of the environment perception was extended obviously. Figure2 illustrates the working procedure of UGV working in the cross-country environment.Figure 2
The workflow of UGV working in cross-country environment perception.Obstacle detection based on laser point cloud data can be categorized as classification problems. The Probability Test helps decide whether the current region is traversable or not, by means of searching the target point within adjacent areas in the 2D lattice map. The first-order Markov model is employed to correct the systematic error. The key step of detecting traversable region based on Probability Test is the parameter adjustment, including the barrier height threshold, probability threshold of statistical, and the unknown parameters of Markov model, such as the various error parameters of Markov chain (the covariance and measurement noise). The discriminated type learning algorithm contributes to the local optimization of these parameters. And the learning algorithm is based on theory named by “coordinate ascend method.” The value of each parameter will be changed with a fixed amount after being given the initial assumption, to determine whether the new parameter value is better than the older one. If yes, the next step is to retain the new parameter value.The laser point cloud data is not the only source of obtaining terrain information. UGV can also detect the traversable terrain by mapping 3D laser data into the camera image related to the region. To put it more plainly, we extract traversable region in front of the UGV in the 2D lattice map based on camera image and then decide the corresponding traversable terrain by means of the geometric projection method. Adaptive visual algorithm establishes the Gaussian Mixture Model based on the color information of traversable region, using all image pixels within the range of traversable terrain for training sample. Each mixture model is the Gaussian Model defined by the individual pixel in RGB color space. When new images are detected, the pixels within the range of traversable terrain are mapped into the K-local Gaussian Model by using the EM method. The K-local Gaussian Model incorporates the learning algorithm, and there are two ways to make the different color image adaptable. One is to adjust the internal Gaussian Model and make it more adaptable for actual image pixels, which can help the UGV gradually adaptable for the change of light. The other one responds to the new Gaussian Model that is different from the elder one, which is based on the color information decided by material of terrain. For instance, if the UGV walks around on asphalt or nonasphalt (off-road) terrain, the color information related to terrain material is obviously different.Based on the information from the single CCD and laser 3D data, feature vectors related to obstacle are extracted, which include the edge chain-code curvature from the color image, the penetrability capability of the laser point cloud, and the main component analysis of covariance matrix. Specifically, it is shown that the edge of shrub or herb image is irregular since its leaves and branches are always protuberant. The edge of shrub or herb in the monochrome images looks like sawtooth shape since its leaves and branches are always protuberant. In this case, chain-code tracing from the thinning image represents the edge feature of shrub or herb, which is described by the variation of the edge’s curvature value. In general, the edges of tree trunk images are almost nearly parallel after image processing. The camera can provide the color image and visible monochrome images according to each color band, depending on the requirement of the application. The texture of water images is not relatively rough and the color of water tends to be generally blue, due to the reflection of the sky. Since there are huge contrasts of texture difference between water and the other ones in this paper, it is meaningful to consider the contrast of texture based on gray scale as one of feature evidence. In addition, HSV model represents color with hue, saturation, and value (also called brightness) in an attempt to be more intuitive and perceptually relevant than the RGB model described by Cartesian (cube) representation. An other characteristic that water hazard presents usually is low saturation, while terrain around is saturated generally. As illustrated in Figure3(a), hue level of the water region with sky reflection covers full of hue spectrum, which means that hue is of marginal use for water region detection. According to statistics on saturation-value levels of water and terrain region, respectively, as shown in Figure 3(b), water region clusters in the high value, low saturation region. Meanwhile, a ray from the origin represents saturation-value ratio and separates the characteristic scatters of water region (orange scatters) and terrain region (purple scatters) practically. Figure 3(d) shows the segmentation using the saturation-value ratio on the image of Figure 3(c). Overall, saturation-value ratio could be chosen as one of feature evidence related to water region.Statistical analysis of saturation, value, and hue of water and terrain region.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Not surprisingly, shrub, weeds, and bushes seem easier to be to be penetrated, while rocks and tree trunks tend to be hard. The statistical range of each type of obstacles has been covered in the framework. The “invalid data” feature of water images and the “penetration rate” feature of shrub or herb can be extracted based on the 3D data of laser sensor. The three geometrical prototypes of tree trunk (straight line), rocks and waters (plane), and shrub or herb (porous entity) are represented by the eigenvalue, which is included in covariance matrix (cov.) including characteristic distortion value of the different types of obstacles, as illustrated in Figure4. λ0, λ1, and λ2 represent characteristic distortion value respectively. When the 3D data points are scattered into a sphere, λ0, λ1, and λ2 are approximately equal. The 3D data points acquired from shrub or herb show this case. If the 3D data points with a linear distribution, it indicates λ0≥λ1≈λ2, and the tree trunk best fits the circumstances. The characteristic distortion value of rock has the conclusion of λ0≈λ1≥λ2. The distortion feature is proposed based on tensor voting method. The method does not assume that 3D points obey the standard normal distribution (SND), so it accords with the real distribution of laser data points in 3D space. Based on the principal component analysis, the covariance matrix calculated by 3D data points will be decomposed, and then the distribution of different obstacles’ data points in the specific area will describe local terrain.Figure 4
The graphic distortion features related to shrub or herb, tree trunk, and rocks.


## 4. Data Fusion

### 4.1. The Sensors and Organizing Structure of Fusion System

The system can also be able to detect the hazardous slopes. Kalman filter is used for low-level fusion of physical level, thus using the D-S evidence theory for high-level data fusion. The purpose of the low-level information fusion is unifying the characteristics of the sensor data to the framework of information fusion system and integrating these features to generate more precise and detailed information characteristics. D-S evidence theory is used for making decision rules, considering the uncertainty of each sensor. In order to obtain a more reasonable inference, the weight coefficient is combined when the high conflict information exists: here focus on high-level data fusion. For detail, the first step is to establish an identification frame including many kinds of obstacles for recognition in the multifeature information fusion system. Secondly, various types of feature evidence are selected to determine what features of obstacle participate in the multifeature fusion. Based on sensor information, it is necessary to extract the feature which contributes most. Thirdly, the key step is to construct a basic probability assignment function. The paper intends to distribute evidence to “rough” identity report given by each sensor characteristic (or proposition). The membership and correlation coefficient will be determined by the fuzzy interpolation, and the probability assignment function will be determined depending on the target type and weight coefficients. Finally, the total probability assignment functions of each type of obstacles will be calculated according to the D-S combination rule. The obstacle’s identity will be determined by reasonable identity decision rules (as shown in Figure5), and the obstacle’s geometric information of 3D data will be obtained according to laser information.Figure 5
The sketch map of data fusion using D-S evidence theory.


### 4.2. The Distribution of Basic Probability Assignment Function

The term “Basic Probability Assignment,” represented by mass value, does not refer to probability in the classical sense. It defines a mapping of the power set to the interval between 0 and 1, where the BPA of the null set is 0 and the BPA’s summation of all the subsets of the power set is 1. One of the main difficulties is how to initialize the BPA mass function of evidence as well as possible. There is no general answer to the key problem of mass definition [14]. In many application systems, the most widely used mass functions are derived from the probabilities or from the neighborhood information according to the distance [15]. In addition, some other methods such as those based on the use of neighborhood information have been proposed [16]. In this paper, the mass values are assigned depending on the experimental formula which is definitely closely related to application. The formula can be defined as follows [17]:
(1)αi=max{Pi(j)∣j=1,2…,N},ζi=Nλi∑j=1NPi(j),i=1,2,…,M,βi=ζi-1M-1,M≥2,i=1,2,…,M,Ri=λiαiβi∑j=1Mλiαiβi,i=1,2,…,M,
where N stands for the types of object in off-road environment, M corresponds to the total number of sensor sources, Pi(j) is the correlation coefficient that is evidenced with respect to event in the framework, and λi means weight coefficient; then the mass value will be assigned as follows:
(2)mi(j)=Pi(j)∑l=1NPi(j)+N(1-Ri)(1-λiαiβi).
The uncertainty value is modified as
(3)Θi≜m(Θ)=N(1-Ri)(1-λiαiβi)∑j=1NPi(j)+N(1-Ri)(1-λiαiβi).
The calculation of the correlation coefficient based on the provided information is the key problem in initializing mass value corresponding to evidence. The correlation coefficient between two pieces of evidence needs to be decided by experiment or prediction. The sample in this paper is a demonstration based on the subordinate. The subordinate is represented by mij as measurement of uncertainty. Its lower and upper bounds may be viewed as 0 and 1 but different from the probability. The measurement of the subordinate is described by using the fuzzy interpolation [18]. Then the value of the subordinate mij is converted into correlation coefficient Pi(j).There existsm fuzzy concept FCi(i=1,2,…,m) within the universe of discourse U={u1,u2,…,un}, and each fuzzy concept has its normalized set Ei which means that element uj completely yields to FCi; this is denoted by μFCi(uj)=1. Also the characteristic function of normalized set Ei is defined as follows:
(4)XEi(uj)={1,μFCi(uj)=1,0,μFCi(uj)≠1.
Let ei be the vectors of Ei and suppose that we have ei=(ei1,…,eij,…,ein), where eij=XEi(uj). The normalized matrix E is shown as
(5)E={e1e2⋮em}.
Let MBS respond to the subordinate matrix of m fuzzy concept in the universe of discourse; MBS=(mbs1,…,mbsi,…,mbsm)T. Also, suppose that mbsi denotes subordinate vector of fuzzy concept and is defined in the following manner:
(6)mbsi=(mi1,…,min)T,mij=μFCi(uj),
where the value of the subordinate mij is the correlation coefficient Pi(j). Obviously, m-ij is the average of subordinate which means how uj∈U resembles any fuzzy concept FCi. Here is the method of its value solution.(i)
IfμFCi(uj)=1, then m-ij=1. Otherwise, according to the fuzzy interpolation algorithm we introduce m-ij=(1/t)∑eik=1S(uj,uk), where t=∑k=1neik=|Ei| is the number of fuzzy concept FCi. Both uj and uk are the elements of normalized set Ei. S(uj,uk) means how much uj resembles uk; we employ the equation S(uj,uk)=1-d(uj,uk)/dmax to calculate the resemblance. d(uj,uk) represents the distance between uj and uk; likewise, dmax is the distance maximum between any two elements of normalized set Ei.(ii)
Subordinatemij is also equal to the value of element with number j of mbsi in the subordinate matrix MBS. In order to get more reasonable subordinate value we have it filtered by using mij=m-ij2. Then correlation coefficient Pi(j) is related to the subordinate value.We assume that the framework includes such obstacles as stone, trunk, shrub, and water in the off-road condition and then extract their appropriate features as the evidence applied to modify the normalized setEi. Based on the knowledge mentioned above, the subordinate vector mbsi may be calculated.The paper can establish the environment perception topographic maps for UGV and precisely mark the traversable region in front of the UGV, and even report the obstacles’ identity. To realize the function, the registration problem related to laser module and visual module’s redundancy must be resolved. Namely, how to determine whether the information referenced by the object are the same characteristics, since they come from different sensors. Sensor calibration will be fulfilled by adjusting single CCD and laser sensor to the same field angle and scene, and then the “registered” relationship of pixels between two sensor images will be obtained. Moreover, each pixel of the image has the information of gray, color, and depth; the “visual-depth” 3D image will be established. Based on GPS and Micromechanical Vibration Gyroscope, the self-calibration of UGV position chooses the world coordinate system as the reference coordinate system. By mapping the identity and 3D information of obstacles in each single sensor image into the “vision-depth” 3D image, the environment perception topographic maps, traversable region, and impenetrable region are successfully established. The azimuth and pitching angle of the UGV’s current position are obtained based on GPS and Micromechanical Vibration Gyroscope. The local coordinate system of single sensor is converted into the global coordinate system of the fusion system. The coordinate origin of the two-dimensional global fusion system falls in the center line of the UGV. The horizontal and forward directions of axle Y coincide with the symmetry axis of UGV. Axle X points to the right direction of UGV. As mentioned above, the main purpose of the sensor data fusion is to make real decisions for the small lattice region on the map.


## 4.1. The Sensors and Organizing Structure of Fusion System

The system can also be able to detect the hazardous slopes. Kalman filter is used for low-level fusion of physical level, thus using the D-S evidence theory for high-level data fusion. The purpose of the low-level information fusion is unifying the characteristics of the sensor data to the framework of information fusion system and integrating these features to generate more precise and detailed information characteristics. D-S evidence theory is used for making decision rules, considering the uncertainty of each sensor. In order to obtain a more reasonable inference, the weight coefficient is combined when the high conflict information exists: here focus on high-level data fusion. For detail, the first step is to establish an identification frame including many kinds of obstacles for recognition in the multifeature information fusion system. Secondly, various types of feature evidence are selected to determine what features of obstacle participate in the multifeature fusion. Based on sensor information, it is necessary to extract the feature which contributes most. Thirdly, the key step is to construct a basic probability assignment function. The paper intends to distribute evidence to “rough” identity report given by each sensor characteristic (or proposition). The membership and correlation coefficient will be determined by the fuzzy interpolation, and the probability assignment function will be determined depending on the target type and weight coefficients. Finally, the total probability assignment functions of each type of obstacles will be calculated according to the D-S combination rule. The obstacle’s identity will be determined by reasonable identity decision rules (as shown in Figure5), and the obstacle’s geometric information of 3D data will be obtained according to laser information.Figure 5
The sketch map of data fusion using D-S evidence theory.


## 4.2. The Distribution of Basic Probability Assignment Function

The term “Basic Probability Assignment,” represented by mass value, does not refer to probability in the classical sense. It defines a mapping of the power set to the interval between 0 and 1, where the BPA of the null set is 0 and the BPA’s summation of all the subsets of the power set is 1. One of the main difficulties is how to initialize the BPA mass function of evidence as well as possible. There is no general answer to the key problem of mass definition [14]. In many application systems, the most widely used mass functions are derived from the probabilities or from the neighborhood information according to the distance [15]. In addition, some other methods such as those based on the use of neighborhood information have been proposed [16]. In this paper, the mass values are assigned depending on the experimental formula which is definitely closely related to application. The formula can be defined as follows [17]:
(1)αi=max{Pi(j)∣j=1,2…,N},ζi=Nλi∑j=1NPi(j),i=1,2,…,M,βi=ζi-1M-1,M≥2,i=1,2,…,M,Ri=λiαiβi∑j=1Mλiαiβi,i=1,2,…,M,
where N stands for the types of object in off-road environment, M corresponds to the total number of sensor sources, Pi(j) is the correlation coefficient that is evidenced with respect to event in the framework, and λi means weight coefficient; then the mass value will be assigned as follows:
(2)mi(j)=Pi(j)∑l=1NPi(j)+N(1-Ri)(1-λiαiβi).
The uncertainty value is modified as
(3)Θi≜m(Θ)=N(1-Ri)(1-λiαiβi)∑j=1NPi(j)+N(1-Ri)(1-λiαiβi).
The calculation of the correlation coefficient based on the provided information is the key problem in initializing mass value corresponding to evidence. The correlation coefficient between two pieces of evidence needs to be decided by experiment or prediction. The sample in this paper is a demonstration based on the subordinate. The subordinate is represented by mij as measurement of uncertainty. Its lower and upper bounds may be viewed as 0 and 1 but different from the probability. The measurement of the subordinate is described by using the fuzzy interpolation [18]. Then the value of the subordinate mij is converted into correlation coefficient Pi(j).There existsm fuzzy concept FCi(i=1,2,…,m) within the universe of discourse U={u1,u2,…,un}, and each fuzzy concept has its normalized set Ei which means that element uj completely yields to FCi; this is denoted by μFCi(uj)=1. Also the characteristic function of normalized set Ei is defined as follows:
(4)XEi(uj)={1,μFCi(uj)=1,0,μFCi(uj)≠1.
Let ei be the vectors of Ei and suppose that we have ei=(ei1,…,eij,…,ein), where eij=XEi(uj). The normalized matrix E is shown as
(5)E={e1e2⋮em}.
Let MBS respond to the subordinate matrix of m fuzzy concept in the universe of discourse; MBS=(mbs1,…,mbsi,…,mbsm)T. Also, suppose that mbsi denotes subordinate vector of fuzzy concept and is defined in the following manner:
(6)mbsi=(mi1,…,min)T,mij=μFCi(uj),
where the value of the subordinate mij is the correlation coefficient Pi(j). Obviously, m-ij is the average of subordinate which means how uj∈U resembles any fuzzy concept FCi. Here is the method of its value solution.(i)
IfμFCi(uj)=1, then m-ij=1. Otherwise, according to the fuzzy interpolation algorithm we introduce m-ij=(1/t)∑eik=1S(uj,uk), where t=∑k=1neik=|Ei| is the number of fuzzy concept FCi. Both uj and uk are the elements of normalized set Ei. S(uj,uk) means how much uj resembles uk; we employ the equation S(uj,uk)=1-d(uj,uk)/dmax to calculate the resemblance. d(uj,uk) represents the distance between uj and uk; likewise, dmax is the distance maximum between any two elements of normalized set Ei.(ii)
Subordinatemij is also equal to the value of element with number j of mbsi in the subordinate matrix MBS. In order to get more reasonable subordinate value we have it filtered by using mij=m-ij2. Then correlation coefficient Pi(j) is related to the subordinate value.We assume that the framework includes such obstacles as stone, trunk, shrub, and water in the off-road condition and then extract their appropriate features as the evidence applied to modify the normalized setEi. Based on the knowledge mentioned above, the subordinate vector mbsi may be calculated.The paper can establish the environment perception topographic maps for UGV and precisely mark the traversable region in front of the UGV, and even report the obstacles’ identity. To realize the function, the registration problem related to laser module and visual module’s redundancy must be resolved. Namely, how to determine whether the information referenced by the object are the same characteristics, since they come from different sensors. Sensor calibration will be fulfilled by adjusting single CCD and laser sensor to the same field angle and scene, and then the “registered” relationship of pixels between two sensor images will be obtained. Moreover, each pixel of the image has the information of gray, color, and depth; the “visual-depth” 3D image will be established. Based on GPS and Micromechanical Vibration Gyroscope, the self-calibration of UGV position chooses the world coordinate system as the reference coordinate system. By mapping the identity and 3D information of obstacles in each single sensor image into the “vision-depth” 3D image, the environment perception topographic maps, traversable region, and impenetrable region are successfully established. The azimuth and pitching angle of the UGV’s current position are obtained based on GPS and Micromechanical Vibration Gyroscope. The local coordinate system of single sensor is converted into the global coordinate system of the fusion system. The coordinate origin of the two-dimensional global fusion system falls in the center line of the UGV. The horizontal and forward directions of axle Y coincide with the symmetry axis of UGV. Axle X points to the right direction of UGV. As mentioned above, the main purpose of the sensor data fusion is to make real decisions for the small lattice region on the map.


## 5. Results

This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the Unmanned Ground Vehicle of DLUT. The UGV developed by the DLUT in collaboration with its primary supporters relies on a software pipeline for processing sensor data and determining proper steering, throttle, and brake commands.The software related to the common methodology is applied in the UGV autonomous control. However, many of the individual modules relied on state-of-the-art artificial intelligent techniques. The test results show that the pervasive use of machine learning made it robust and precise. Reliable detection of nontraversable hazards is a key requirement and significant challenge for autonomous cross-country navigation. DLUT is developing a daytime obstacle detection capability using UGV mounted sensors and has performed types of obstacle detection algorithms. To perform robust obstacle detection under all conditions, multiple sensors will be necessary. In this paper, we currently focus on the cues for obstacle detection that color camera and laser radar provided. Sensor data are collected from a general dynamics autonomous system and processed off-line with run-time passive perception software that includes rock obstacle detector, nontraversable tree trunk detector, and bush or shrub detector. Figure6 shows the obstacle detection results including rock, tree trunk, and bush. The left column images come from camera, central column data represent 3D laser data, and the right ones show the detection results in the map. Figure 7 shows water body detection results based on CCD. Since the water 3D data coming from laser are invalid, the value shown is zero. That is the reason why water region detection results are shown based on image in this paper.Figure 6
The obstacle detection results based on CCD and laser data.Figure 7
Water body detection results based on CCD.The cross-country environment is more complicated than the indoors or urban road. The UGV should constantly determine where to go or where not. In order to improve UGV’s ability of environment perception the obstacles need to be recognized. The D-S evidence theory is an effective method for dealing with uncertainty problems in multisensor data fusion. To assign the mass value of BPA, this paper provides a new approach to handle this problem based on fuzzy subordinate. The experiment results have demonstrated the viability of this new method. The accuracy and robustness of obstacle recognition are both improved. Figures8, 9, and 10 showed software interface and some of detection results by using D-S evidence theory. Take Figure 8 as an example; the top left images are from CCD, and top right respond to 3D images. The lower image illustrates the software interface of the fusion system. Some information related to obstacles are included here, for instance, the number of obstacles, the three-dimension information, the value related to each feature evidence and BPA mass, and so forth. From Figures 8 to 10, they give the examples that yield Dempster’s combination and decision rules to be accepted in practice. It has revealed that fuzzy subordinate could be a potential method for the mass value; by using this method we obtain more precise identification probability and reduce the uncertainty effectively. Besides, the fusion system can tell 3D information of the detected obstacles which helps make path plan and cruise control decision. Most of obstacles could be recognized accurately based on D-S evidence theory. All in all, these figures show that the recognition results are satisfactory and the robustness is improved by using the proposed methods.Figure 8
Shrub identification results.Figure 9
Trunk identification results.Figure 10
Stone identification results.


## 6. Conclusions

Cross-country environmental perception for Unmanned Ground Vehicle (UGV) is the key technology of autonomous navigation, and robust obstacle detection is a critical perception requirement for UGV autonomous navigation. Additionally, a UGV that is either broken down due to obstacle damage during an autonomous military mission may require rescue, potentially drawing critical resources away from the primary mission. So environment perception should be strongly supported and rapidly developed. The previous work took multiple algorithm approaches to detect discrete objects with different dominant characteristics.In this paper, Kalman filter is used for low-level fusion of physical level, thus using the D-S evidence theory for high-level data fusion. Probability Test and Gaussian Mixture Model are applied to obtain the traversable region for UGV. One feature set including color and texture information is extracted from areas of interest in the forward-facing camera view, combined with a classifier approach to resolve two terrain types (traversable or not). The problem of additional obstacle multiclassification (tree trunk, water, shrub, stone, etc.) related to cross-country environment is investigated, and the results are reported over a series of real environment data.The D-S evidence theory is an effective method for dealing with uncertainty problems in multisensor data fusion. To assign the mass value of BPA, this paper provides a new approach to handle this problem based on fuzzy subordinate. In addition, the new evidence is extracted for applying Dempster’s combination rules. The principal components including distance contrast of three-dimension data, image edge chain-code curvature, and covariance matrix are highly focused here. Another breakthrough is to discuss new method that is suitable for distributing basic probability assignment (BPA); then the subordination obtained by using the fuzzy interpolation is applied to calculate the BPA, which is employed to integrate sensors information based on D-S theory of evidence and ultimately to recognize obstacle more precisely. The experiment results have demonstrated the viability of this new method.Our more recent work is looking forward extending the obstacle and terrain perception capabilities of a UGV by using new sensors. For example, more types of obstacle or terrain classification can be taken into account. When the visual sensor cannot be used during night, possible additional sensors including multispectral cameras in the thermal IR could be employed for obstacle recognition or terrain classification. Future work will focus more on the use of temporal analysis over multiple frames and related investigation of varying weather and lighting conditions on performance.



---

*Source: 903951-2013-11-07.xml*