# Wound Myiasis Caused bySarcophaga (Liopygia) Argyrostoma (Robineau-Desvoidy) (Diptera: Sarcophagidae): Additional Evidences of the Morphological Identification Dilemma and Molecular Investigation

Authors: Annunziata Giangaspero; Marianna Marangi; Antonio Balotta; Claudio Venturelli; Krzysztof Szpila; Antonella Di Palma
Journal: The Scientific World Journal
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

In Mediterranean countries,Sarcophaga (Liopygia) crassipalpis,Sarcophaga (L.) argyrostoma,andSarcophaga (L.) cultellata share the same ecological niche and can be responsible of myiasis. In this study, the main morphological characters of a larva found in a hospitalized woman were described and illustrated by light and SEM microscopy and the features discussed. Then, a fragment within the mitochondrial encoded cytochrome c oxidase subunit I(coxI) gene of ~735 bp was amplified and sequenced. The molecular investigation was necessary to confirm the speciesSarcophaga (Liopygia) argyrostoma (99% of identity). Our findings showed that morphological descriptions of larvae of three Mediterranean species ofLiopygia available in several papers might not be clear enough to allow for comparison and correct identification. Until results of reliable comparative studies of larvae of all three species will be available, the use of molecular tools is crucial, to avoid misleading or incomplete identification, and in particular when a myiasis becomes a legal issue.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In Europe, 33Sarcophaga Meigen species attracted to large carrion have been described [1]. Several of them pose confirmed status of facultative myiasis agents [2]. Among them, in the Mediterranean countries, threeSarcophagaspecies belonging to the same subgenus(Liopygia) share the same ecological niche:Sarcophaga (Liopygia) crassipalpis Macquart, 1839, Sarcophaga (L.) argyrostomaRobineau-Desvoidy, 1830, andSarcophaga (L.) cultellata Pandelle, 1986 [3]. These species are included in the category of “nosocomial myiasis agents” because they have been found in wound myiasis affecting hospital patients who are immobilized, often old, and poorly cared [4–8]. Flies are attracted by the smell of fresh or infected and untreated wounds and lay eggs (or larvae as in the case ofSarcophaga), which then develop in necrotic or injured tissues and sometimes cause or exacerbate a wound [9]. This can often become a legal problem, which entails an urgent need to identify the larvae.Where the geographical species distribution overlaps, as happens for these threeSarcophaga species in the Mediterranean area [3], and only one single larva is available, differentiation of these three species becomes very challenging [3, 10]. Thus, cross-checking of the morphological and molecular data is highly recommended for both adult [11] and larval specimens [10].The mitochondrial encoded cytochrome c oxidase subunit I(coxI) gene has been shown to be a major candidate gene for molecular identification of forensic flies [12] and is currently the most widely used genetic marker for differentiation ofSarcophaga species of forensic interest thanks to its intraspecific (below 1.5%) and the interspecific divergence (2–2.5%) [13, 14].The aim of this contribution is to report a case of nosocomial myiasis, to describe and illustrate the main morphological characters used in identification of the collected larva, compared to those available in the literature, and to highlight the need for molecular support for correct identification.


## 2. Materials and Methods

In September 2014, a 101-year-old female patient who had been bedridden for months in a geriatric home in Cesena was specifically admitted to Bufalini Hospital with a “parasitic infestation” of a wound. A single larva was found on the wound, removed with pincers, and preserved in ethanol (ETOH 80% v/v). The wound was then disinfected using chlorhexidine.The larva collected was subsequently sent for identification to the Parasitology Unit of the University of Foggia. Here it was cut into three parts; thoracic and terminal segments were subjected to microscopy, while the abdominal segment was used for molecular identification.


### 2.1. Microscopy

The larva portions were first macerated in lactophenol for one week at 45°C on a hot plate and then mounted on a Hoyer’s-embedded slide. Observations, identification and light images were obtained using an Olympus BX51 light microscope (LM) equipped with an Olympus E330 camera.The larva portions were then remounted from the slide and prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Hoyer’s fluid was removed with water, and the larva portions were dehydrated using a graded ethanol series, dried with a Leica EM CPD300 critical point dryer, mounted on SEM stubs using conductive carbon adhesive tabs, and sputter-coated using an Edwards S150A sputter coater apparatus. A Hitachi TM3030 tabletop scanning electron microscope was used for observations and micrographs.The III instar larva was identified using the key for myiasis-causing flies [15] and for the Sarcophagidae family to subgenus level [10]. The most distinctive characters available in literature forSarcophaga (Liopygia) spp. identification, that is,Sarcophaga argyrostoma[8, 10, 16, 17],Sarcophaga crassipalpis [18], andSarcophaga cultellata [3], were considered. In particular, the presence/absence of spines/warts on the t2 interband area, the number of lobes on the anterior spiracles, the shape of the posterior spiracles, and cephalo-skeleton were compared (Table 1).Table 1
Third larval stage of the most commonSarcophaga (Liopygia) species: comparison of the main morphological features, and related iconographic documentation, available in the literature.
Anatomical sites Sarcophaga (Liopygia) species Our findings (III stage larvae) Sarcophaga argyrostoma Sarcophaga crassipalpis Sarcophaga cultellata (LM and SEM) 1st and 2nd thoracic segment At least anterior part of second thoracic segment without spines/warts on interband area [1, 10] NONE Shape of the anterior spinose band of the first thoracic segment [3] Figures1(a) and 1(b)  Anterior spiracles Typal digit-like lobes with 10-11 lobes [17] Typal digit-like lobes with 12 lobes[19] Typal digit-like lobes with 15–18 lobes [3] Figure1(c)  Posterior spiracles Posterior spiracle, ovate or kidney-shapedVentral arch of the posteriorspiracle, long, reaching the inner arch area [17] Posterior spiracle, roundVentral arch of the posterior spiracle, short, not reaching the inner arch area[19] Posterior spiracle, kidney-shapedA thick well sclerotized peritreme which is incomplete and divided into four regions: (a) a straight inner arch with a triangular protuberance at the ventral tip, (b) a scalloped shaped dorsal arch, (c) a round outer arch, (d) and a short and straight ventral arch. The inner arch is slightly oblique with respect to the sagittal plane of the larva, and the line drawn by this arch is reached by the free tip of ventral archInner arch of posteriorspiracle oblique, almost parallel to the inner respiratory slit [3] Figure2  Cephaloskeleton Ventral cornua have a developed windowVentral bridge of the intermediate sclerite with the tip truncated [17] Ventral bridge of the intermediate sclerite with the tip rounded[19] Dorsal edge of the mouth hooks, including approximately two-thirds of the length of the tooth, being rectilinear and only curved at the tipThe parastomal bar is fused to the basal sclerite, and the anterior tip is usually pointing upward(i) The window of the dorsal cornu is clearly 8-shaped(ii) The dorsal bridge is more slender(iii) The window of the ventral cornua is smaller [3] Figures3(a), 3(b), and 3(c)  Spiracular cavity Edge of spiracular cavity, highly scaly [17] None Edge of spiracular cavity slightly covered by filamentous spines [3] Figure4


### 2.2. Molecular Investigation

DNA was extracted using the Nucleospin Tissue kit (Macherey-Nagel, Netherlands) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was eluted in 50μL of distilled water and the sample was stored at −20°C.Universal primer pairs (F1/R1; F2/R2; F3/R3) (Table2) [20] were used to amplify fragments of different sizes within the cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene. The PCR reaction mix contained 5x Phire Reaction Buffer (Thermo Scientific, USA), 200 μM of dNTPs (Qiagen, USA), 10 μL of each primer pairs, 1U Phire Hot Start II DNA Polymerase (Thermo Scientific, USA), and 1 μL of genomic DNA in a final volume of 20 μL. The PCR protocol was as follows: denaturation at 98°C for 30 s, followed by 98°C for 5 s and 59°C for 30 s for 35 cycles, and finally 72°C for 1 min. A negative control (PCR water) was included in each PCR run. The PCR products were run on 1.2% agarose gel and positive samples were purified with Exonuclease I (EXO I) and Thermosensitive Alkaline Phosphatase (FAST AP) (Fermentas) enzymes.Table 2
Universal primer sequences within the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase gene subunit I (coxI) (by Kim et al., [20]).
Name Sequence Binding site F1 CCTTTAGAATTGCAGTCTAATGTCA tRNA-cysteine F2 GGAGGATTTGGAAATTGATTAGTTCC 220–245 on COI F3 CTGCTACTTTATGAGCTTTAGG 2–23 on COI R1 CCTAAATTTGCTCATGTTGACA 1000–1022 on COI R2 CAAGTTGTGTAAGCATC 1327–1343 on COI R3 CCAAAGAATCAAAATAAATGTTG 688–710 on COIAmplicons obtained were directly sequenced in both directions using the ABI PRIMS BygDye Terminator v. 3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA) with the same primers as the respective PCRs reaction, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequences obtained were determined on an ABI PRISM 3130 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems), electropherograms were inspected by eye, and consensus sequence was determined assembling different PCR fragments.Our sequence was aligned with the available nucleotide sequences in publicly databases, using the BLASTn software and the Muscle application implemented in SeaView 4. Moreover, our sequence was aligned with all theS. argyrostoma DNA barcode sequences [ID numbers: NICC0085, accession number: JQ582081; NICC0637, accession number: JQ582123] [21] using Bioedit V.5 software and the Muscle application implemented in SeaView 4. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted in MEGA6 using the Neighbor-Joining method. The evolutionary distances were computed using the p-distance method and were in the units of the number of base differences per site. The analysis involved 45 nucleotide sequences. Codon positions included were 1st + 2nd + 3rd + Noncoding. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were 61 positions in the final dataset. The tree was rooted using aWohlfahrtia magnifica sequence as an outgroup (accession number: FJ379616).


## 2.1. Microscopy

The larva portions were first macerated in lactophenol for one week at 45°C on a hot plate and then mounted on a Hoyer’s-embedded slide. Observations, identification and light images were obtained using an Olympus BX51 light microscope (LM) equipped with an Olympus E330 camera.The larva portions were then remounted from the slide and prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Hoyer’s fluid was removed with water, and the larva portions were dehydrated using a graded ethanol series, dried with a Leica EM CPD300 critical point dryer, mounted on SEM stubs using conductive carbon adhesive tabs, and sputter-coated using an Edwards S150A sputter coater apparatus. A Hitachi TM3030 tabletop scanning electron microscope was used for observations and micrographs.The III instar larva was identified using the key for myiasis-causing flies [15] and for the Sarcophagidae family to subgenus level [10]. The most distinctive characters available in literature forSarcophaga (Liopygia) spp. identification, that is,Sarcophaga argyrostoma[8, 10, 16, 17],Sarcophaga crassipalpis [18], andSarcophaga cultellata [3], were considered. In particular, the presence/absence of spines/warts on the t2 interband area, the number of lobes on the anterior spiracles, the shape of the posterior spiracles, and cephalo-skeleton were compared (Table 1).Table 1
Third larval stage of the most commonSarcophaga (Liopygia) species: comparison of the main morphological features, and related iconographic documentation, available in the literature.
Anatomical sites Sarcophaga (Liopygia) species Our findings (III stage larvae) Sarcophaga argyrostoma Sarcophaga crassipalpis Sarcophaga cultellata (LM and SEM) 1st and 2nd thoracic segment At least anterior part of second thoracic segment without spines/warts on interband area [1, 10] NONE Shape of the anterior spinose band of the first thoracic segment [3] Figures1(a) and 1(b)  Anterior spiracles Typal digit-like lobes with 10-11 lobes [17] Typal digit-like lobes with 12 lobes[19] Typal digit-like lobes with 15–18 lobes [3] Figure1(c)  Posterior spiracles Posterior spiracle, ovate or kidney-shapedVentral arch of the posteriorspiracle, long, reaching the inner arch area [17] Posterior spiracle, roundVentral arch of the posterior spiracle, short, not reaching the inner arch area[19] Posterior spiracle, kidney-shapedA thick well sclerotized peritreme which is incomplete and divided into four regions: (a) a straight inner arch with a triangular protuberance at the ventral tip, (b) a scalloped shaped dorsal arch, (c) a round outer arch, (d) and a short and straight ventral arch. The inner arch is slightly oblique with respect to the sagittal plane of the larva, and the line drawn by this arch is reached by the free tip of ventral archInner arch of posteriorspiracle oblique, almost parallel to the inner respiratory slit [3] Figure2  Cephaloskeleton Ventral cornua have a developed windowVentral bridge of the intermediate sclerite with the tip truncated [17] Ventral bridge of the intermediate sclerite with the tip rounded[19] Dorsal edge of the mouth hooks, including approximately two-thirds of the length of the tooth, being rectilinear and only curved at the tipThe parastomal bar is fused to the basal sclerite, and the anterior tip is usually pointing upward(i) The window of the dorsal cornu is clearly 8-shaped(ii) The dorsal bridge is more slender(iii) The window of the ventral cornua is smaller [3] Figures3(a), 3(b), and 3(c)  Spiracular cavity Edge of spiracular cavity, highly scaly [17] None Edge of spiracular cavity slightly covered by filamentous spines [3] Figure4


## 2.2. Molecular Investigation

DNA was extracted using the Nucleospin Tissue kit (Macherey-Nagel, Netherlands) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was eluted in 50μL of distilled water and the sample was stored at −20°C.Universal primer pairs (F1/R1; F2/R2; F3/R3) (Table2) [20] were used to amplify fragments of different sizes within the cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene. The PCR reaction mix contained 5x Phire Reaction Buffer (Thermo Scientific, USA), 200 μM of dNTPs (Qiagen, USA), 10 μL of each primer pairs, 1U Phire Hot Start II DNA Polymerase (Thermo Scientific, USA), and 1 μL of genomic DNA in a final volume of 20 μL. The PCR protocol was as follows: denaturation at 98°C for 30 s, followed by 98°C for 5 s and 59°C for 30 s for 35 cycles, and finally 72°C for 1 min. A negative control (PCR water) was included in each PCR run. The PCR products were run on 1.2% agarose gel and positive samples were purified with Exonuclease I (EXO I) and Thermosensitive Alkaline Phosphatase (FAST AP) (Fermentas) enzymes.Table 2
Universal primer sequences within the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase gene subunit I (coxI) (by Kim et al., [20]).
Name Sequence Binding site F1 CCTTTAGAATTGCAGTCTAATGTCA tRNA-cysteine F2 GGAGGATTTGGAAATTGATTAGTTCC 220–245 on COI F3 CTGCTACTTTATGAGCTTTAGG 2–23 on COI R1 CCTAAATTTGCTCATGTTGACA 1000–1022 on COI R2 CAAGTTGTGTAAGCATC 1327–1343 on COI R3 CCAAAGAATCAAAATAAATGTTG 688–710 on COIAmplicons obtained were directly sequenced in both directions using the ABI PRIMS BygDye Terminator v. 3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA) with the same primers as the respective PCRs reaction, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequences obtained were determined on an ABI PRISM 3130 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems), electropherograms were inspected by eye, and consensus sequence was determined assembling different PCR fragments.Our sequence was aligned with the available nucleotide sequences in publicly databases, using the BLASTn software and the Muscle application implemented in SeaView 4. Moreover, our sequence was aligned with all theS. argyrostoma DNA barcode sequences [ID numbers: NICC0085, accession number: JQ582081; NICC0637, accession number: JQ582123] [21] using Bioedit V.5 software and the Muscle application implemented in SeaView 4. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted in MEGA6 using the Neighbor-Joining method. The evolutionary distances were computed using the p-distance method and were in the units of the number of base differences per site. The analysis involved 45 nucleotide sequences. Codon positions included were 1st + 2nd + 3rd + Noncoding. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were 61 positions in the final dataset. The tree was rooted using aWohlfahrtia magnifica sequence as an outgroup (accession number: FJ379616).


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Microscopy

The larva examined in this study had the following characters:(1)
No spines on t2 interband area (Figures1(a) and 1(b))(2)
Anterior spiracles with 14 lobes (Figure1(c))(3)
Kidney-shaped posterior spiracles (Figure2)(4)
Short ventral arch of the posterior spiracle, not reaching the inner arch area (Figure2)(5)
Ventral cornua of the cephaloskeleton with developed window (Figure3(a))(6)
Dorsal cornua not clearly 8-shaped (Figure3(a)) and tip shape of the intermediate sclerite apparently truncated (Figure 3(c))(7)
Spiracular cavity with very wrinkled edge (Figure4)Figure 1
Sarcophagasp. third instar larva. (a) SEM image, anterior dorsal view of the body showing the interband areas free of any spines/warts and the anterior spinose band (arrows). (b) SEM image, detail of the spines on the anterior spinose band areas (arrows). (c) LM image, lateral view of anterior body showing anterior spiracle with 14-digit-like lobes clearly visible. Scale bar: 1 mm (a); 50 μm (b); 100 μm (c).
(a) (b) (c)Figure 2
Sarcophaga spp. third instar larva: LM image, overview of kidney-shaped posterior spiracles with ventral arches (arrows) not reaching the inner arch area. Scale bar: 100 μm.Figure 3
Sarcophaga third instar larva: LM image: (a) cephaloskeleton with dorsal cornua showing window apparently 8-shaped (arrow) while the ventral cornua window is smaller but still well developed (arrowhead). (b) Same sample showing a different shape (more elongated and not 8-shaped) of the window due to a different orientation of the sample in the slide. (c) Detail of the ventral bridge of the intermediate sclerite with truncated tip (arrows). Scale bar: 100 μm.
(a) (b) (c)Figure 4
Sarcophagasp. third instar larva: SEM images. (a) Overview of the posterior spiracle cavity. (b) Detail showing highly wrinkled edge of the posterior cavity (arrow). Scale bar: 100 μm (a); 30 μm (b).
(a) (b)According to the comparative table and illustrations (Table1), of the seven features above, one (number 5) and apparently another (number 6) point toS. argyrostoma species; one character (number 1) points to all three species (S. argyrostoma and/orS. cultellata and/orS. crassipalpis); one character could be related to bothS. argyrostoma and/orS. cultellata (number 3), one to bothS. crassipalpis and/orS. cultellata species (number 4), and two features (nos. 2 and 7) are apparently not associated with any of the three species.


### 3.2. Molecular Investigations

Sequencing provided a good quality sequence of about 735 bp. BLASTn analysis (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) showed that our sequence matched the target GenBankcoxI sequenceS. argyrostoma with a 99% of identity. Ninety-nine percent of identity was also obtained by alignment withcoxI DNA barcode region sequence [21]. The sequence was deposited in GenBank under accession number KU570766. The phylogenetic analysis showed that the Italian sequence clusters with the otherS. argyrostoma sequences (from Belgium, France, Egypt, and USA) in a monophyletic group with a high bootstrap value (>95) and that this clade is distant from the otherSarcophagaspecies (Figure 5).Figure 5
The Neighbor-Joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree based on analysis of the partial cytochromec oxidase subunit I gene ofSarcophagaspecies of forensic interest. TheSarcophaga argyrostoma sequence from the present study (black spot), 11 sequences representing the otherSarcophaga species belonging toLiopygia subgenus, that is,S. crassipalpis (9) andS. cultellata(2) and 20 otherSarcophaga species from GenBank were included in the analysis for comparative purposes.Wohlfahrtia magnificawas used as an outgroup. GenBank accession numbers (in brackets),Sarcophaga species, and country of origin are reported.


## 3.1. Microscopy

The larva examined in this study had the following characters:(1)
No spines on t2 interband area (Figures1(a) and 1(b))(2)
Anterior spiracles with 14 lobes (Figure1(c))(3)
Kidney-shaped posterior spiracles (Figure2)(4)
Short ventral arch of the posterior spiracle, not reaching the inner arch area (Figure2)(5)
Ventral cornua of the cephaloskeleton with developed window (Figure3(a))(6)
Dorsal cornua not clearly 8-shaped (Figure3(a)) and tip shape of the intermediate sclerite apparently truncated (Figure 3(c))(7)
Spiracular cavity with very wrinkled edge (Figure4)Figure 1
Sarcophagasp. third instar larva. (a) SEM image, anterior dorsal view of the body showing the interband areas free of any spines/warts and the anterior spinose band (arrows). (b) SEM image, detail of the spines on the anterior spinose band areas (arrows). (c) LM image, lateral view of anterior body showing anterior spiracle with 14-digit-like lobes clearly visible. Scale bar: 1 mm (a); 50 μm (b); 100 μm (c).
(a) (b) (c)Figure 2
Sarcophaga spp. third instar larva: LM image, overview of kidney-shaped posterior spiracles with ventral arches (arrows) not reaching the inner arch area. Scale bar: 100 μm.Figure 3
Sarcophaga third instar larva: LM image: (a) cephaloskeleton with dorsal cornua showing window apparently 8-shaped (arrow) while the ventral cornua window is smaller but still well developed (arrowhead). (b) Same sample showing a different shape (more elongated and not 8-shaped) of the window due to a different orientation of the sample in the slide. (c) Detail of the ventral bridge of the intermediate sclerite with truncated tip (arrows). Scale bar: 100 μm.
(a) (b) (c)Figure 4
Sarcophagasp. third instar larva: SEM images. (a) Overview of the posterior spiracle cavity. (b) Detail showing highly wrinkled edge of the posterior cavity (arrow). Scale bar: 100 μm (a); 30 μm (b).
(a) (b)According to the comparative table and illustrations (Table1), of the seven features above, one (number 5) and apparently another (number 6) point toS. argyrostoma species; one character (number 1) points to all three species (S. argyrostoma and/orS. cultellata and/orS. crassipalpis); one character could be related to bothS. argyrostoma and/orS. cultellata (number 3), one to bothS. crassipalpis and/orS. cultellata species (number 4), and two features (nos. 2 and 7) are apparently not associated with any of the three species.


## 3.2. Molecular Investigations

Sequencing provided a good quality sequence of about 735 bp. BLASTn analysis (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) showed that our sequence matched the target GenBankcoxI sequenceS. argyrostoma with a 99% of identity. Ninety-nine percent of identity was also obtained by alignment withcoxI DNA barcode region sequence [21]. The sequence was deposited in GenBank under accession number KU570766. The phylogenetic analysis showed that the Italian sequence clusters with the otherS. argyrostoma sequences (from Belgium, France, Egypt, and USA) in a monophyletic group with a high bootstrap value (>95) and that this clade is distant from the otherSarcophagaspecies (Figure 5).Figure 5
The Neighbor-Joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree based on analysis of the partial cytochromec oxidase subunit I gene ofSarcophagaspecies of forensic interest. TheSarcophaga argyrostoma sequence from the present study (black spot), 11 sequences representing the otherSarcophaga species belonging toLiopygia subgenus, that is,S. crassipalpis (9) andS. cultellata(2) and 20 otherSarcophaga species from GenBank were included in the analysis for comparative purposes.Wohlfahrtia magnificawas used as an outgroup. GenBank accession numbers (in brackets),Sarcophaga species, and country of origin are reported.


## 4. Discussion

In this study, the single III instar larva showed some characters that are typical forS. argyrostoma, whereas some other characters were not. Thus, according to the morphological characters it was only possible to assume the identification of the single III instar larva asSarcophaga (Liopygia) argyrostoma but a molecular investigation analysis was needed for confirmation.In addition toSarcophaga (Liopygia) argyrostoma, two other species in the same subgenus are found in Mediterranean countries:S. (L.)crassipalpis Macquart, 1839, andS.(L.)cultellata Pandelle, 1986 [3, 10]. These three species have been recorded either in case reports of wound myiasis in live humans or in supporting forensic investigations of human corpses. In Southern Italy,S. crassipalpis was identified in a corpse [18], whileS. cultellata has been identified in human corpses in Spain [3, 22] and also in Northern Italy [23].The main key morphological characters for differentiation of the III larval stage in these three species of the subgenusLiopygia involve dorsal surface of the II thoracic segment, anterior spiracle digits/papillae, posterior spiracles, and the shape of the cephaloskeleton [3, 10]. In our case, those characters do not appear clearly unequivocal: some key features seem related to all three species, that is, the second thoracic segment interband area [10], and shape of the posterior spiracles [3, 17, 18], while some characteristics cannot be ascribed to any of these three species, that is, the number of lobes on anterior spiracles and edge of the posterior spiracular cavity [3, 17] (Table 1). Moreover, some characters are difficult to read, since their appearance and shape may change with the position of the sample on the slide. An obvious example is provided by the shape of the dorsal cornua window, which appears different on the same sample, merely because of its position (please compare Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). Generally, the main obstacle in the use of morphological markers for identification of larvae of subgenusLiopygia is lack of solid comparative analysis. Studies of potentially useful characters, based on a long series of individuals and unified methodology, should solve this problematic situation as it was done for larval stages of some other difficult taxa (e.g., [24, 25]).Hence, when larvae come from theLiopygia distribution area, that is, the Mediterranean countries, the available morphological features may not be clear enough for comparison and correct identification. This problem, coupled with the difficulty of checking all characters when a single specimen is provided, calls for the use of molecular tools.The robustness of thecoxI gene as a diagnostic marker to lay the groundwork for identification of these three species ofSarcophagahas been demonstrated [21, 26].Sarcophaga argyrostoma has been identified using acoxI sequence in an elderly patient with an external ophthalmomyiasis (with 97% identity) [6] and very recently in a tracheotomized child’s surgical wound (with an identity of 100%) [8]. In the present study, the involvement ofS. argyrostoma in the wound myiasis is confirmed with 99% identity.This is the third case in Europe [4, 8]. Cases of myiasis caused bySarcophaga species are apparently few, but it must be underlined that cases of myiasis often remain unrecorded or that, more frequently, identification is partial, that is, at genus level [27–31].


## 5. Conclusion

In conclusion, it is very important to record and correctly identify the species involved in nosocomial myiasis, particularly if patients are moved from geriatric homes to hospital for such problem and thus even become a legal issue.Correct identification of the myiasis agent provides more detailed information on the responsibility that health units (hospitals, geriatric homes, etc.) must have towards patients. In this view, hygiene, protection from flies by physical barriers (screens or closed windows), efficient waste disposal measures to reduce the smell of decomposition, and insecticide sprays are basic prevention measures that hospitals should take.



---

*Source: 9064531-2017-01-29.xml*