# Knowledge, Treatment, Control, and Risk Factors for Hypertension among Adults in Southern Iran

Authors: Sayed Fazel Zinat Motlagh; Reza Chaman; Sayed Rashid Ghafari; Zafar Parisay; Mohamad Reza Golabi; Ahmad Ali Eslami; Amin Babouei
Journal: International Journal of Hypertension
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

Hypertension is the first and the most common risk factor to diseases such as cardiovascular, stroke, and renal diseases. The aim of this study was to determine the factors relevant to hypertension knowledge, treatment, and control in southern Iran. In this cross-sectional study, conducted in Kohgiluye Boyer-Ahmad province, south of Iran, a total of 1836 hypertension patients were randomly selected to participate voluntarily in the study. Hypertension treatment and its control were defined during study. In addition, knowledge about hypertension was measured by hypertension knowledge level scale (HK-LS). Treatment rates were 75.5 and 37.7 percent for female and male, respectively. Habitat, education, income, family history with hypertension, smoking, and time of diagnosis to the disease were found to be related to the treatment of the disease. Control rates were 30.7 and 31.4 for males and females, respectively. Habitat, education, and time of diagnosis to the disease were related to control. Over 50 percent of patients had average knowledge on hypertension. Considering the low rate of control and knowledge on hypertension among patients, health care providers should reinforce their services to improve appropriate knowledge level among elders and, also, plan comprehensive programs to promote health in order to encourage patients change and reform their life style.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Rapid rise of noncommunicable diseases has been considered as a major health challenge in the present century, which threatens social and economic development of communities and people health [1]. Such diseases impose half of the burden of diseases cost in the world [2–4]. Following the present trend, it is predicted that patients will be responsible for over 70 percent of diseases by 2020 [1, 4, 5]. In this regard, hypertension has been considered as the first and the most common risk factor to cardiovascular diseases, stroke, and renal diseases; it has been known as a main modulated disability cause around the world [6, 7] so that hypertension caused at least 45 percent of mortality due to cardiovascular problems and 51 percent of stroke mortality rate [8]. Among 17 million deaths due to cardiovascular problems in the world [8], 9.4 million occur as a consequence of complications of hypertension [9]. In this regard, in Eastern Mediterranean Region where Iran is located, 26 percent of mortality results from hypertension [10].On the other hand, statistics showed an increase in the prevalence of hypertension. The number of patients with hypertension has increased from 600 million cases in 1980 to 1 billion in 2008; over 40 percent of adults were known to have hypertension [11]. Also, it was suggested that, by 2025, 1.54 billion adults will suffer from hypertension [12]. In this regard, it was reported to be 14 to 34 percent in Iran [13–18] and various studies in other countries reported high rates of hypertension from 18 to 72 percent among males and females [19–27].It is essential to control hypertension to minimize the side effects of hypertension. Rates reported for hypertension control were disappointing [28], which were suggested to be 13 to 56 percent around the world [23, 26, 29, 30]. An important component to control hypertension is knowledge, which is relative to lower rates of ceasing interventions, following the interventions behavior and better control on disease by patients. As a result, careful evaluation of hypertension has been considered as an inseparable part of general care of the patients [31].Studies suggested low levels of knowledge on hypertension among patients [23, 24, 32], and lack of correct information and improper understanding of hypertension did not appertain to rural sites; it has been widely reported in urban environments and industrial countries, too [33, 34]. In Iran, studies on knowledge, treatment, and control of hypertension suggested low levels of the mentioned factors [15, 16]. In Isfahan healthy heart program, the effects of comprehensive self-care programs on improving knowledge, attitude, and treatment among patients with hypertension were investigated. The results from the program showed that factors such as knowledge, treatment pursuit, and hypertension control were 49.9, 43.8, and 15.8 percent, respectively [16]. Another study reported treatment and hypertension control as 33.35 and 35.10 percent [15].Considering factors related to knowledge and hypertension management is an essential starting point to preventing high rates of cardiovascular mortality due to hypertension [35]. However, there is little information available on knowledge, treatment, and control of hypertension in southern Iran. Noticing the importance of the topic, the aim of this study was to determine the factors relevant to hypertension knowledge, treatment, and control in southern Iran.


## 2. Methods

### 2.1. Participants

This cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of men and women with hypertension in urban and rural health centres in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province in southern Iran, in 2014. Patients met the inclusion criteria (six months past the definitive diagnosis disease doctor, a record in health centres, over the age of 30). To participate in the study the patients were invited by phone or visiting their location. Participants who could not communicate effectively with the study personnel or provide informed consent were excluded. Finally, out of the 2,400 patients invited to study, 1836 (76.52%) signed the consent form and voluntarily agreed to participate in the study.


### 2.2. Measures

Questionnaire included three sections that comprised the following questions: sociodemographic characteristics, hypertension-related information, and hypertension knowledge.


#### 2.2.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics Variables

Sociodemographic data included data on age, gender, educational level (illiterate, elementary school, middle school, high school, diploma, and university), monthly family income (>5 million rials, 5 million rials to 10 million rials, 10 million rials to 15 million rials, and <15 million rials), marital status (single, married, divorced, or widowed/widower), employment status which was coded in 5 categories (employed, unemployed, farmer, retired, and housekeeper), physical activity, and smoking. (For smoking and hookah, nonsmoker and smoker were distinguished.)Body Mass Index. Height (height was evaluated with an error close to 0.1 cm, using a SECA portable stadiometer with the individual in the standing position) and weight (weight measurements were taken with participants wearing light clothing and no shoes; weight was measured with an error close to 0.5 Kg using a SECA digital scale) were recorded by a nurse. Body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight/height2) was divided into 4 categories: below normal weight (BMI < 18.5), normal weight (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25.0), overweight (25.0 ≤ BMI < 30.0), and obese (BMI ≥ 30.0) [36].


#### 2.2.2. Hypertension-Related Information

Hypertension-related questions included duration of hypertension, family history of HTN, and treatment of HTN which was defined as self-reported current use of antihypertensive medication. Control of HTN was defined as hypertensive participants’ SBP < 140 mm Hg and DBP < 90 mm Hg among hypertensive participants who treated their HTN with drugs; that is, control in treatment was also analyzed. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) C140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) C90 mm Hg according to the WHO criteria or history of previously diagnosed disease [37]; BP was measured in a sitting position after a minimum of 5 minutes of rest by using a standardized digital BP measuring machine (Omron Digital).


#### 2.2.3. Hypertension Knowledge

Hypertension knowledge was ascertained by using Hypertension Knowledge Level Scale (HK-LS). This tool was developed from the Hypertension Knowledge Level Scale (HK-LS), a 22-item scale prepared by Erkoc et al. [37]. Hypertension Knowledge Level Scale (HK-LS) assessed respondents’ knowledge in defining hypertension, lifestyle, medical treatment, drug compliance, diet, and complication of hypertension. Each item was a full sentence that was either correct or incorrect. And each item was prepared as part of a standard answer (correct, incorrect, or do not know). To assess the content validity of the scale to identify whether items were or were not representative of the knowledge level of hypertension, the opinions of experts were requested via an assessment form. The expert opinions were evaluated, and 2 items were excluded from the scale. All items were evaluated in terms of clarity and expression by considering the expert opinions, and relevant changes (definition (1 item), medical treatment (4 items), drug compliance (4 items), lifestyle (4 items), diet (2 items), and complications (5 items)) were made.


### 2.3. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS windows version 21.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).P value < 0.05 was considered significant.


## 2.1. Participants

This cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of men and women with hypertension in urban and rural health centres in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province in southern Iran, in 2014. Patients met the inclusion criteria (six months past the definitive diagnosis disease doctor, a record in health centres, over the age of 30). To participate in the study the patients were invited by phone or visiting their location. Participants who could not communicate effectively with the study personnel or provide informed consent were excluded. Finally, out of the 2,400 patients invited to study, 1836 (76.52%) signed the consent form and voluntarily agreed to participate in the study.


## 2.2. Measures

Questionnaire included three sections that comprised the following questions: sociodemographic characteristics, hypertension-related information, and hypertension knowledge.


### 2.2.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics Variables

Sociodemographic data included data on age, gender, educational level (illiterate, elementary school, middle school, high school, diploma, and university), monthly family income (>5 million rials, 5 million rials to 10 million rials, 10 million rials to 15 million rials, and <15 million rials), marital status (single, married, divorced, or widowed/widower), employment status which was coded in 5 categories (employed, unemployed, farmer, retired, and housekeeper), physical activity, and smoking. (For smoking and hookah, nonsmoker and smoker were distinguished.)Body Mass Index. Height (height was evaluated with an error close to 0.1 cm, using a SECA portable stadiometer with the individual in the standing position) and weight (weight measurements were taken with participants wearing light clothing and no shoes; weight was measured with an error close to 0.5 Kg using a SECA digital scale) were recorded by a nurse. Body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight/height2) was divided into 4 categories: below normal weight (BMI < 18.5), normal weight (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25.0), overweight (25.0 ≤ BMI < 30.0), and obese (BMI ≥ 30.0) [36].


### 2.2.2. Hypertension-Related Information

Hypertension-related questions included duration of hypertension, family history of HTN, and treatment of HTN which was defined as self-reported current use of antihypertensive medication. Control of HTN was defined as hypertensive participants’ SBP < 140 mm Hg and DBP < 90 mm Hg among hypertensive participants who treated their HTN with drugs; that is, control in treatment was also analyzed. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) C140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) C90 mm Hg according to the WHO criteria or history of previously diagnosed disease [37]; BP was measured in a sitting position after a minimum of 5 minutes of rest by using a standardized digital BP measuring machine (Omron Digital).


### 2.2.3. Hypertension Knowledge

Hypertension knowledge was ascertained by using Hypertension Knowledge Level Scale (HK-LS). This tool was developed from the Hypertension Knowledge Level Scale (HK-LS), a 22-item scale prepared by Erkoc et al. [37]. Hypertension Knowledge Level Scale (HK-LS) assessed respondents’ knowledge in defining hypertension, lifestyle, medical treatment, drug compliance, diet, and complication of hypertension. Each item was a full sentence that was either correct or incorrect. And each item was prepared as part of a standard answer (correct, incorrect, or do not know). To assess the content validity of the scale to identify whether items were or were not representative of the knowledge level of hypertension, the opinions of experts were requested via an assessment form. The expert opinions were evaluated, and 2 items were excluded from the scale. All items were evaluated in terms of clarity and expression by considering the expert opinions, and relevant changes (definition (1 item), medical treatment (4 items), drug compliance (4 items), lifestyle (4 items), diet (2 items), and complications (5 items)) were made.


## 2.2.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics Variables

Sociodemographic data included data on age, gender, educational level (illiterate, elementary school, middle school, high school, diploma, and university), monthly family income (>5 million rials, 5 million rials to 10 million rials, 10 million rials to 15 million rials, and <15 million rials), marital status (single, married, divorced, or widowed/widower), employment status which was coded in 5 categories (employed, unemployed, farmer, retired, and housekeeper), physical activity, and smoking. (For smoking and hookah, nonsmoker and smoker were distinguished.)Body Mass Index. Height (height was evaluated with an error close to 0.1 cm, using a SECA portable stadiometer with the individual in the standing position) and weight (weight measurements were taken with participants wearing light clothing and no shoes; weight was measured with an error close to 0.5 Kg using a SECA digital scale) were recorded by a nurse. Body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight/height2) was divided into 4 categories: below normal weight (BMI < 18.5), normal weight (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25.0), overweight (25.0 ≤ BMI < 30.0), and obese (BMI ≥ 30.0) [36].


## 2.2.2. Hypertension-Related Information

Hypertension-related questions included duration of hypertension, family history of HTN, and treatment of HTN which was defined as self-reported current use of antihypertensive medication. Control of HTN was defined as hypertensive participants’ SBP < 140 mm Hg and DBP < 90 mm Hg among hypertensive participants who treated their HTN with drugs; that is, control in treatment was also analyzed. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) C140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) C90 mm Hg according to the WHO criteria or history of previously diagnosed disease [37]; BP was measured in a sitting position after a minimum of 5 minutes of rest by using a standardized digital BP measuring machine (Omron Digital).


## 2.2.3. Hypertension Knowledge

Hypertension knowledge was ascertained by using Hypertension Knowledge Level Scale (HK-LS). This tool was developed from the Hypertension Knowledge Level Scale (HK-LS), a 22-item scale prepared by Erkoc et al. [37]. Hypertension Knowledge Level Scale (HK-LS) assessed respondents’ knowledge in defining hypertension, lifestyle, medical treatment, drug compliance, diet, and complication of hypertension. Each item was a full sentence that was either correct or incorrect. And each item was prepared as part of a standard answer (correct, incorrect, or do not know). To assess the content validity of the scale to identify whether items were or were not representative of the knowledge level of hypertension, the opinions of experts were requested via an assessment form. The expert opinions were evaluated, and 2 items were excluded from the scale. All items were evaluated in terms of clarity and expression by considering the expert opinions, and relevant changes (definition (1 item), medical treatment (4 items), drug compliance (4 items), lifestyle (4 items), diet (2 items), and complications (5 items)) were made.


## 2.3. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS windows version 21.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).P value < 0.05 was considered significant.


## 3. Results

The mean age of respondents was 66.26 years [SD: 12.36], ranging from 30 to 93 years. Almost, 722 participants were male (39.3%) and 1114 were female (60.7%). More than half of the participants (51.5%) were older than 60. Furthermore, 822 participants (44.8%) were living in cities and 1014 (55.2%) were living in villages. Regarding education, 1149 (66.2%) were illiterate, 362 (19.7%) were at elementary levels, 114 (6.2%) were at guidance level, 46 (2.5%) were at high school level, 90 (4.9%) finished high school, and 75 (4.1%) had academic education. With respect to marital status, 1488 participants (81%) were married. 191 (17.6%) were widows and 25 (1.4%) were single. Over 90 percent of participants had low income. In addition, 45.5 percent reported family history of hypertension. Also, 27.5 percent of the respondents reported regular physical activity (Table1).Table 1
Percentage (%) of treatment and control of hypertension among hypertensive adults (N=1836).
Variables
N
Control
Treatment
n
%
P
n
%
P
Gender
Total
1863
572
31.2
—
1373
74.8
—
Male
722
222
30.7
P
=
0.796
532
73.7
P
=
0.383
Female
1114
350
31.4
841
75.5
Age groups
39–30
95
33
34.7
P
=
0.135
56
58.9
P
=
0.000
49–40
262
84
32.1
180
68.7
59–50
534
183
34.3
401
75.1
≥60
945
272
28.8
736
77.9
Region
Urban
822
308
37.5
P
=
0.000
593
72.1
P
=
0.019
Rural
1014
264
26
780
76.9
Marital status
Single
25
10
40
P
=
0.251
16
64
P
=
0.138
Married
1488
472
31.7
1104
74.2
Divorced and widowed/widower
323
90
27.9
253
78.3
Education level
Illiterate
1149
322
28
P
=
0.000
891
77.5
P
=
0.004
Primary school
362
129
35.6
258
71.3
Secondary school
114
34
29.8
76
66.7
High school
46
22
47.8
32
69.6
Diploma
90
28
31.1
60
66.7
University
75
37
49.3
56
74.6
Job
Farmer
205
58
28.9
P
=
0.351
143
71.1
P
=
0.659
Employed
111
42
37.8
84
75.7
Retired
184
64
34.8
137
74.5
Unemployed
269
79
29.4
197
73.2
Housekeeper
1071
329
30.7
812
75.8
Income
Poor
1655
495
29.9
P
=
0.002
1235
74.6
P
=
0.833
Medium
148
61
41.2
112
75.7
Good
33
16
48.5
26
78.8
Family history of hypertension
Yes
832
289
34.7
P
=
0.003
624
75
P
=
0.845
No
1004
283
28.2
749
74.6
Physical activity
Yes
512
174
34
P
=
0.104
380
74.2
P
=
0.730
No
1324
398
30.1
993
75
Tobacco
Yes
253
61
24.1
P
=
0.009
188
73.3
P
=
0.852
No
1583
511
32.3
1185
74.9
Body mass index (BMI)
≤18.5
15
5
33.3
P
=
0.612
11
73.3
P
=
0.980
25–18.5
655
214
32.7
493
75.3
30–25
736
229
31.1
547
74.3
≥30
430
124
28.8
322
74.9
Duration of diagnosis
≤5
955
297
31.1
P
=
0.045
669
70.1
P
=
0.000
5–9
366
130
35.5
293
80.1
10–14
298
79
26.5
235
78.9
15–19
129
33
25.6
97
75.2
≥20
88
33
37.5
79
89.8


### 3.1. Hypertension Treatment and Control

As shown in Table1, 222 male (30.7%) and 350 (31.4%) participants reported self-control on their hypertension. There was no significant difference between male and female participants (P=0.796), though it was higher among females. There was a statistically significant correlation between habitat (P=0.000), education (P=0.000), income (P=0.002), family history on hypertension (P=0.003), smoking (P=0.006), and diagnosis time (P=0.045). Participants living in cities, with higher education and income levels, showed better control on their hypertension.Treatment rate was high among participants. The treatment rates were 75.5% and 37.7% for females and males, respectively, while there was no statistically significant correlation between male and female participants (P=0.383). 36.1 percent of participants who were under treatment showed regular use of their medications. 24.4 percent of participants under treatment reported control on their hypertension. There was a statistically significant correlation between age (P=0.000), habitat (P=0.019), education (P=0.004), and diagnosis time (P=0.045).


### 3.2. Knowledge

Table2 represents patient’s knowledge about hypertension. In general, 25.2 percent of participants showed high knowledge on hypertension (definition of hypertension, treatment pursuit, lifestyle, nutrition, and hypertension side effects).Table 2
Percentage (%) of knowledge of hypertension among hypertensive adults (N=1836).
Variables
Weak
Average
Good
P
N
%
N
%
N
%
Gender
Male
141
19.5
385
53.3
196
27.1
P
=
0.261
Female
218
19.6
630
56.6
266
23.9
Age groups
39–30
22
23.4
39
41.1
34
35.8
P
=
0.019
49–40
41
15.6
144
55
77
29.4
59–50
100
18.7
300
56.2
134
25.1
≥60
196
20.7
532
56.3
217
23
Region
Urban
149
18.1
452
55
221
26.9
P
=
0.189
Rural
210
20.7
563
55.5
241
23.8
Marital status
Single
5
20
6
24
14
56
P
=
0.004
Married
296
19.9
820
55.1
372
25
Divorced and widowed/widower
58
18
189
58.5
76
23.5
Education level
Illiterate
234
20.4
663
57.7
252
21.9
P
=
0.000
Primary school
72
19.9
206
57.9
84
23.2
Secondary school
24
21.4
61
53.5
29
25.4
High school
4
8.7
22
47.8
20
43.5
Diploma
18
20
42
47.7
30
33.3
University
7
9.3
21
28
47
62.6
Occupation
Farmer
35
17.4
114
56.7
52
25.9
P
=
0.001
Employed
13
11.7
55
49.5
43
38.7
Retired
34
18.5
88
47.8
62
33.7
Unemployed
63
23.4
151
56.1
55
20.4
Housekeeper
214
20
607
56.7
250
13.3
Income
Weak
322
20.1
20
13.5
7
21.7
P
=
0.005
Average
927
56
73
49.3
15
45.5
Good
396
23.9
55
32.2
11
33.3
Family history of hypertension
Yes
154
19.1
460
55.3
213
25.6
P
=
0.874
No
200
19.9
555
55.3
246
24.4
Tobacco
Yes
33
27.5
66
55
21
17.5
P
=
0.028
No
326
19
949
55.3
441
25.7
Physical activity
Yes
68
13.3
295
57.6
149
29.1
P
=
0.000
No
291
22
720
54.4
313
23.6
Body mass index (BMI)
≤18.5
4
26.7
7
46.7
4
26.7
P
=
0.157
25–18.5
143
21.8
364
55.6
148
22.6
30–25
136
18.5
417
56.7
183
24.9
≥30
76
17.7
227
52.7
127
29.5
Duration of diagnosis
≤5
183
19.2
522
54.7
250
26.2
P
=
0.714
5–9
77
21
204
55.7
85
23.2
10–14
60
20.1
169
56.7
69
23.2
15–19
22
17.1
77
59.7
30
23.3
≥20
17
19.3
43
48.9
28
31.8This parameter was higher among male in comparison to females, participants with higher income in comparison to those with low incomes, among employees in comparison to other occupations, and among those with regular physical activities which was statistically meaningful.


## 3.1. Hypertension Treatment and Control

As shown in Table1, 222 male (30.7%) and 350 (31.4%) participants reported self-control on their hypertension. There was no significant difference between male and female participants (P=0.796), though it was higher among females. There was a statistically significant correlation between habitat (P=0.000), education (P=0.000), income (P=0.002), family history on hypertension (P=0.003), smoking (P=0.006), and diagnosis time (P=0.045). Participants living in cities, with higher education and income levels, showed better control on their hypertension.Treatment rate was high among participants. The treatment rates were 75.5% and 37.7% for females and males, respectively, while there was no statistically significant correlation between male and female participants (P=0.383). 36.1 percent of participants who were under treatment showed regular use of their medications. 24.4 percent of participants under treatment reported control on their hypertension. There was a statistically significant correlation between age (P=0.000), habitat (P=0.019), education (P=0.004), and diagnosis time (P=0.045).


## 3.2. Knowledge

Table2 represents patient’s knowledge about hypertension. In general, 25.2 percent of participants showed high knowledge on hypertension (definition of hypertension, treatment pursuit, lifestyle, nutrition, and hypertension side effects).Table 2
Percentage (%) of knowledge of hypertension among hypertensive adults (N=1836).
Variables
Weak
Average
Good
P
N
%
N
%
N
%
Gender
Male
141
19.5
385
53.3
196
27.1
P
=
0.261
Female
218
19.6
630
56.6
266
23.9
Age groups
39–30
22
23.4
39
41.1
34
35.8
P
=
0.019
49–40
41
15.6
144
55
77
29.4
59–50
100
18.7
300
56.2
134
25.1
≥60
196
20.7
532
56.3
217
23
Region
Urban
149
18.1
452
55
221
26.9
P
=
0.189
Rural
210
20.7
563
55.5
241
23.8
Marital status
Single
5
20
6
24
14
56
P
=
0.004
Married
296
19.9
820
55.1
372
25
Divorced and widowed/widower
58
18
189
58.5
76
23.5
Education level
Illiterate
234
20.4
663
57.7
252
21.9
P
=
0.000
Primary school
72
19.9
206
57.9
84
23.2
Secondary school
24
21.4
61
53.5
29
25.4
High school
4
8.7
22
47.8
20
43.5
Diploma
18
20
42
47.7
30
33.3
University
7
9.3
21
28
47
62.6
Occupation
Farmer
35
17.4
114
56.7
52
25.9
P
=
0.001
Employed
13
11.7
55
49.5
43
38.7
Retired
34
18.5
88
47.8
62
33.7
Unemployed
63
23.4
151
56.1
55
20.4
Housekeeper
214
20
607
56.7
250
13.3
Income
Weak
322
20.1
20
13.5
7
21.7
P
=
0.005
Average
927
56
73
49.3
15
45.5
Good
396
23.9
55
32.2
11
33.3
Family history of hypertension
Yes
154
19.1
460
55.3
213
25.6
P
=
0.874
No
200
19.9
555
55.3
246
24.4
Tobacco
Yes
33
27.5
66
55
21
17.5
P
=
0.028
No
326
19
949
55.3
441
25.7
Physical activity
Yes
68
13.3
295
57.6
149
29.1
P
=
0.000
No
291
22
720
54.4
313
23.6
Body mass index (BMI)
≤18.5
4
26.7
7
46.7
4
26.7
P
=
0.157
25–18.5
143
21.8
364
55.6
148
22.6
30–25
136
18.5
417
56.7
183
24.9
≥30
76
17.7
227
52.7
127
29.5
Duration of diagnosis
≤5
183
19.2
522
54.7
250
26.2
P
=
0.714
5–9
77
21
204
55.7
85
23.2
10–14
60
20.1
169
56.7
69
23.2
15–19
22
17.1
77
59.7
30
23.3
≥20
17
19.3
43
48.9
28
31.8This parameter was higher among male in comparison to females, participants with higher income in comparison to those with low incomes, among employees in comparison to other occupations, and among those with regular physical activities which was statistically meaningful.


## 4. Discussion

Improving knowledge, treatment, and control on hypertension could decrease high rates of mortality by cardiovascular diseases [38]. Results from our study showed that over half of the participants in the study were over 60 years old. Several studies reported a direct significance in the prevalence of hypertension and age, which corresponded to the results from the present study [14, 39–42]. The results, also, suggested higher hypertension risk with elders. Therefore, it seems essential to plan preventive interventions to control hypertension among older people. Results from the present study reported that hypertension remains mostly undiagnosed during the early years of prevalence so that over 45 percent of patients over 60 were diagnosed for hypertension less than 5 years ago, which suggest the careful consideration of screening and increasing public knowledge on hypertension and its symptoms.Our results indicated treatment and control rates on hypertension to be 74.8 and 31.2 percent, which were higher in comparison to the results by Esteghamati et al. [16] (2007) in Isfahan where treatment and control on hypertension were 43.8 and 15.8 percent, respectively. This increase could result from implementing Family Physician program and offering health care services to the patients in Iran.Chow et al. (2013) reported that the rate of treatment and control of hypertension in high-, average-, and poor-income countries is low [43]; results from the studies in Asia suggested similar findings [26, 44, 45]. Low rates of control and treatment of hypertension have been considered as a major risk to increase cardiovascular diseases and stroke [46], which suggested the necessity of efficient implementation of proper training programs and offering essential services to health care services by doctors and health experts, while majority of patients with diagnosed hypertension showed poor control on their disease. This gap has also been reported in several other studies [41, 43, 47]. It seemed that the only way used to control hypertension by patients was taking prescribed medicines; they avoided self-care behaviors such as regular physical activities, good nutrition, and weight control.Results from the present study reported higher treatment and control of hypertension in females in comparison to males, which was in accordance with the results from other studies [14, 43, 47, 48]. As the patients grew older, the treatment of hypertension improved. It seems that patients were more sensitive to their disease when they grew older and tried medicines to treat their disease. It corresponded to the results from other studies [41, 43, 47].Another finding from the present study suggested a statistically significant correlation between hypertension control and patients education. The higher their education level, the higher the control rate among patients so that patients having university degrees showed higher control on their hypertension which was in accordance with results from other studies [14, 26, 47, 49], though it was different from study by CHPSNE which reported lower control on hypertension among individuals with lower education [50]. More than half of the participants reported average knowledge on hypertension, treatment pursuit, lifestyle, nutrition, and complication of hypertension. Only 25.2 percent of participants showed high knowledge on the disease. In comparison with other studies, the present study reported lower rates on the issue [34, 51–53]. Parmar et al. showed good rates of knowledge on hypertension among participants [52]. The difference could result from high number of illiterate participants living in villages.Another finding from the present study considered statistically significant correlation between patient’s age and knowledge on the disease. It reported that the older the participants the less their knowledge on the issue, which was in accordance with results from other studies [34, 52]. It was concluded that age group of 30 to 39 had the higher knowledge on hypertension in comparison to other age groups, which could result from their higher education levels relative to other groups. Results from the present study in this regard suggested a meaningful relationship between education and knowledge: as the education among the patients improves, their knowledge on hypertension increases. It was in agreement with other studies [34, 52]. Low knowledge levels on hypertension were in relation to old age, low levels of education, and low income. Lack of training materials, poor screening, and poor consistency of health team were reported in these groups. It seems necessary to create proper training materials by health experts to improve patients’ knowledge and, also, increase treatment rates and control on patients.The strength of the present study was investigating a large urban and rural population with high rates of responding. However, as over 80 percent of the participants were over 50 years old and there was not a normal coverage to all possible age groups, it was considered as a limitation to the study.


## 5. Conclusion

Considering the low rate of knowledge and control of patients on hypertension, health care providers should reinforce their activities to help to improve patients’ knowledge level, especially among elders, through focusing on identifying risk factors to hypertension, regular drug intake, good nutrition, physical activity, and changing and informing lifestyles of patients with hypertension.



---

*Source: 897070-2015-12-09.xml*