# Design of a Flow-Through Voltammetric Sensor Based on an Antimony-Modified Silver Electrode for Determining Lithol Rubine B in Cosmetics

Authors: Wang Lai-Hao; Huang Shu-Juan
Journal: Journal of Automated Methods and Management in Chemistry
 (2011)

---

## Abstract

Lithol Rubine B (LRB; the disodium salt of 3-hydroxy-4-[(4-methyl-2-sulfophenyl) azo]-2-naphthalenecarboxylic acid) was detected using high-performance liquid chromatography with an electrochemical (antimony film on silver) detector (HPLC-ECD). For direct current (DC) mode, with the current at a constant potential, and measurements with suitable experimental parameters, a linear concentration from 0.125 to 1.80μg/mL was found. The detection limit of our method was approximately 2.0 ng/mL. An antimony-modified silver detector was used to demonstrate that LRB is electrochemically reduced in acidic media and to analyze commercial cosmetics to determine their LRB content. Findings using HPLC-ECD and HPLC with an ultraviolet detector were comparable.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Cosmetics often contain dyes to make them more attractive to consumers. Some of the substances used for these dyes are either allergenic or have other side effects in some persons. Lithol Rubine B (D&C Red no. 6), the disodium salt of 3-hydroxy-4-[(4-methyl-2-sulfophenyl) azo]-2-naphthalenecarboxylic acid, which is an anionic azo compound (CI: 15850), is one such substance. Lithol Rubine B is mutagenic because of intermediate reactions or by-products found in commercial samples [1]. There are several methods for determining trace concentrations of Lithol Rubine B in cosmetic products. Some use high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet visible (UV/Vis) or mass spectrometry (MS) detection [2–6], Raman spectra [7], and voltammetry [8, 9]. Most methods for the quantitative detection and characterization of azo dyes use HPLC analysis [10–14]. UV visible spectrometry is a useful tool, but the azo dyes are largely affected by solvent influence, and require a photodiode array detector. Detection using mass spectrometry is a more sensitive, but more expensive, approach and is not yet available for every laboratory. LC/MS has been recommended for analyzing disperse and low-molecular (<300) azo dyes, but it is not applicable to sulfonated azo dyes. When the mixture sample contains more than two azo dyes, the voltammetric waves of these dyes are seriously overlapped, which makes their quantification difficult without any preanalysis separation and purification. Recent research on the electrodeposition of antimony (Sb) focuses on (a) Sb/Sb2O3 particles for lithium-ion battery anodes [15]; (b) binary and ternary alloys for use in thermoelectric elements [16]; (c) the electrodeposition of Sb on tin oxide (SnO2) electrodes [17], gold (Au) electrodes [18], glassy carbon electrodes (GCEs) [19, 20], and mercury (Hg) electrodes [21]; (d) one ternary film, (antimony/tellurium) (Sb2Te3), on a silver (Ag) electrode [22]. Ag [23] and metal-Sb alloys [24, 25] cause the reduction of electrocatalytic activity and oxidation in organic compounds. However, there are no published studies on using an electrocatalytic sensor with liquid chromatography-electrochemical detection (LC-EC) and flow-injection analysis (FIA) determination of Lithol Rubine B in cosmetic products. Directive 76/768/EEC allows Lithol Rubine B to be used in cosmetic products as a coloring agent at a level of 0.2–2.0%. In the present study, we developed a more sensitive and low-cost method for detecting Lithol Rubine B in cosmetic products. We also report the development of a flow-through voltammetric sensor to catalyze the electroduction of Lithol Rubine B.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Apparatus and Materials

The HPLC system consisted of a Hitachi Model L-7110 pump with a Rheodyne 7125 injection valve with a 20μL sample loop and was coupled with an EG&G PARC 400 controlled potentiostat. The flow-through electrolysis cell was designed with the following electrodes: an Ag/AgCl/0.1 M KCl reference electrode (BAS), a platinum auxiliary electrode, and modified silver electrodes as working electrodes for detecting Lithol Rubine B azo dye. All solvents and the analyte were filtered through 0.45 μm cellulose acetate and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) syringe membrane filters, respectively. A chromatogram of Lithol Rubine B was acquired, and the peak height was calculated using an SISC Chromatogram Data Integrator. Lithol Rubine B (D&C Red 6) pure dye content (>90%) was purchased from Unipure LC Sensient Cosmetic Technologies/LCW (Milwaukee, WI, USA). Cosmetics samples were bought from local department stores or retail outlets in southern Taiwan. Other chemical reagents used were of analytical grade.


### 2.2. Preparing a Thin-Film Antimony Electrode Surface

A thin-film antimony electrode was produced using the following method. Before the analysis, the silver wire electrode (4 cm long, 3 mm in diameter) was mirror-polished sequentially with aqueous suspensions of 1.0, 0.5, and 0.05μm alumina. The electrode was then rinsed with deionized water and electrolytically plated with antimony ions (1.0 × 10−3 to 4.0 × 10−3 M) from 10 mL of acetate buffer (pH 4.5). Plating time was 8 min according to a potential scan of between −1.0 and 0 V (versus Ag/AgCl; at 10 mV/s).


### 2.3. Constructing a Flow-Through Voltammetric Detector

A flow-through electrolysis cell was used for DC-mode electrochemical detection. The detection cell (Scheme1) was constructed in the laboratory. The antimony-modified silver electrode (0.3 mm diameter) was constructed from a length (~8 cm) of Teflon tubing (1/32 in., i.d.; 1/16 in., o.d.), inserted into one end of the Teflon tube, and then sealed with acrylic resin (Struers). A small copper wire was placed at the other end of the Teflon tube to allow an electrical connection to the antimony-modified silver wire electrode. The platinum wire, which served as a counter, and the Ag/AgCl wire, a reference electrode, were then attached in series with the Teflon tube. For stability, the cell compounds were secured with tape to an insulated plastic box. The voltammetric detector, that is, the eluate, was fed to the antimony-modified silver wire electrode, which had been placed in an overflow vessel containing counter-electrodes and reference electrodes.Scheme 1
Diagram of an antimony-modified silver-wire flow-through electrolysis cell.


### 2.4. Preparing the Cosmetics

The cosmetics (rouge, lipstick, and nail polish) contained oils (mineral oil, petrolatum, and lanolin), ester (isopropyl myristate), waxes (paraffin and carnauba), and a powder base (zinc oxide, titanium dioxide, inorganic pigments, and talc) as the primary constituents of the base. The base was bound with the required color. Raw samples received for analysis were converted into a form suitable for making useful measurements by pretreatment, separation, and preconcentration. Taking into account the content of Lithol Rubine B azo dye in each sample, about 1.0 g of each sample was accurately weighed in a 50 mL beaker, diluted to about 10 mL with methanol, dissolved, and then stirred for 2 h. The mixture solution was concentrated, 9 mL of acetate buffer was added, and then the mixture was centrifuged at 6000 × g for 30 min. The supernatant was transferred into a 10 mL calibrated flask; acetate buffer was added to ensure that the flask contained 10 mL of liquid. The sample (1 mL) was loaded onto a C18 cartridge and washed with 1 mL of ethyl acetate, and then the eluent was discarded. The resulting solution was extracted twice with methanol, and the organic layer was evaporated at 40°C under nitrogen. The dried extract was reconstituted with 1 mL of methanol and filtered through 0.45 μm membrane filters before HPLC analysis.


### 2.5. Determining Lithol Rubine B Using a Flow-Through Voltammetric Detector

A stock standard sample solution was prepared by dissolving 10 mg of Lithol Rubine B in 10 mL of water, because Lithol Rubine B is a soluble sulfonated salt. Working standard solutions in the range 0.05–1.2 mg/L were prepared from the stock standard solution. Reversed-phase- (RP-) HPLC was done on a Phenomenex HyperClone C18 5 μm (250 mm × 4.6 mm) column eluted with methanol-water (30 : 70, v/v) and acetonitrile-water (30 : 70, v/v), respectively, containing 0.1 mM of K2HPO4 (pH 4.08) as the mobile phase, at flow rates of 0.7, 0.5, and 0.3 mL/min. After the azo dye components in the cosmetics sample had been separated on the HyperClone C18 column, they were examined using an ultraviolet detector set at 235 nm. The electrochemical detector was operated at −0.6 V. A chromatograph was obtained with 20 μL of the prepared sample solution and a standard solution under the operating conditions described above. Quantitation was based on the peak height of the sample.


## 2.1. Apparatus and Materials

The HPLC system consisted of a Hitachi Model L-7110 pump with a Rheodyne 7125 injection valve with a 20μL sample loop and was coupled with an EG&G PARC 400 controlled potentiostat. The flow-through electrolysis cell was designed with the following electrodes: an Ag/AgCl/0.1 M KCl reference electrode (BAS), a platinum auxiliary electrode, and modified silver electrodes as working electrodes for detecting Lithol Rubine B azo dye. All solvents and the analyte were filtered through 0.45 μm cellulose acetate and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) syringe membrane filters, respectively. A chromatogram of Lithol Rubine B was acquired, and the peak height was calculated using an SISC Chromatogram Data Integrator. Lithol Rubine B (D&C Red 6) pure dye content (>90%) was purchased from Unipure LC Sensient Cosmetic Technologies/LCW (Milwaukee, WI, USA). Cosmetics samples were bought from local department stores or retail outlets in southern Taiwan. Other chemical reagents used were of analytical grade.


## 2.2. Preparing a Thin-Film Antimony Electrode Surface

A thin-film antimony electrode was produced using the following method. Before the analysis, the silver wire electrode (4 cm long, 3 mm in diameter) was mirror-polished sequentially with aqueous suspensions of 1.0, 0.5, and 0.05μm alumina. The electrode was then rinsed with deionized water and electrolytically plated with antimony ions (1.0 × 10−3 to 4.0 × 10−3 M) from 10 mL of acetate buffer (pH 4.5). Plating time was 8 min according to a potential scan of between −1.0 and 0 V (versus Ag/AgCl; at 10 mV/s).


## 2.3. Constructing a Flow-Through Voltammetric Detector

A flow-through electrolysis cell was used for DC-mode electrochemical detection. The detection cell (Scheme1) was constructed in the laboratory. The antimony-modified silver electrode (0.3 mm diameter) was constructed from a length (~8 cm) of Teflon tubing (1/32 in., i.d.; 1/16 in., o.d.), inserted into one end of the Teflon tube, and then sealed with acrylic resin (Struers). A small copper wire was placed at the other end of the Teflon tube to allow an electrical connection to the antimony-modified silver wire electrode. The platinum wire, which served as a counter, and the Ag/AgCl wire, a reference electrode, were then attached in series with the Teflon tube. For stability, the cell compounds were secured with tape to an insulated plastic box. The voltammetric detector, that is, the eluate, was fed to the antimony-modified silver wire electrode, which had been placed in an overflow vessel containing counter-electrodes and reference electrodes.Scheme 1
Diagram of an antimony-modified silver-wire flow-through electrolysis cell.


## 2.4. Preparing the Cosmetics

The cosmetics (rouge, lipstick, and nail polish) contained oils (mineral oil, petrolatum, and lanolin), ester (isopropyl myristate), waxes (paraffin and carnauba), and a powder base (zinc oxide, titanium dioxide, inorganic pigments, and talc) as the primary constituents of the base. The base was bound with the required color. Raw samples received for analysis were converted into a form suitable for making useful measurements by pretreatment, separation, and preconcentration. Taking into account the content of Lithol Rubine B azo dye in each sample, about 1.0 g of each sample was accurately weighed in a 50 mL beaker, diluted to about 10 mL with methanol, dissolved, and then stirred for 2 h. The mixture solution was concentrated, 9 mL of acetate buffer was added, and then the mixture was centrifuged at 6000 × g for 30 min. The supernatant was transferred into a 10 mL calibrated flask; acetate buffer was added to ensure that the flask contained 10 mL of liquid. The sample (1 mL) was loaded onto a C18 cartridge and washed with 1 mL of ethyl acetate, and then the eluent was discarded. The resulting solution was extracted twice with methanol, and the organic layer was evaporated at 40°C under nitrogen. The dried extract was reconstituted with 1 mL of methanol and filtered through 0.45 μm membrane filters before HPLC analysis.


## 2.5. Determining Lithol Rubine B Using a Flow-Through Voltammetric Detector

A stock standard sample solution was prepared by dissolving 10 mg of Lithol Rubine B in 10 mL of water, because Lithol Rubine B is a soluble sulfonated salt. Working standard solutions in the range 0.05–1.2 mg/L were prepared from the stock standard solution. Reversed-phase- (RP-) HPLC was done on a Phenomenex HyperClone C18 5 μm (250 mm × 4.6 mm) column eluted with methanol-water (30 : 70, v/v) and acetonitrile-water (30 : 70, v/v), respectively, containing 0.1 mM of K2HPO4 (pH 4.08) as the mobile phase, at flow rates of 0.7, 0.5, and 0.3 mL/min. After the azo dye components in the cosmetics sample had been separated on the HyperClone C18 column, they were examined using an ultraviolet detector set at 235 nm. The electrochemical detector was operated at −0.6 V. A chromatograph was obtained with 20 μL of the prepared sample solution and a standard solution under the operating conditions described above. Quantitation was based on the peak height of the sample.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Voltammetric Measurement

Azo linkages are reducible; a typical two-electron, two-proton reduction was found for azobenzene [26]. Azobenzene undergoes a fast ECEC reduction to hydrazobenzene which is then oxidized at approximately the same potential as azobenzene is reduced [27]. Azobenzene was reduced to the corresponding anilines using controlled potential coulometry since the initially formed intermediate hydrazobenzene decomposes to aniline. The proposed pathway for the electrochemical reduction of Lithol Rubine B is shown in Scheme 2. For both the GCE and the Sb/Ag electrodes, good linearity was observed between the peak height (current) and the square root of the scan rate (Figure 1). The peak potential became more negative as the scan rate increased. These results showed that the electrode mechanism of Lithol Rubine B is EC reduction.Scheme 2
Proposed pathway of the electrochemical reduction of Lithol Rubine B.Figure 1
Magnitude of the peak current,ip, as a function of square root of scan rate for Lithol Rubine B (3.85 × 10−4 mol/L) reduction at Sb/Ag and GCE in 0.1 M acetate acid buffer (pH 4.50).


### 3.2. Optimization LC Analysis

Two different eluents, methanol-water (30 : 70, v/v) and acetonitrile-water (30 : 70, v/v) containing 0.1 mM of K2HPO4 (pH 4.08) as the mobile phases of both solvent systems, were investigated at various flow rates. The retention times of acetonitrile-water were 9.8, 5.3, and 4.6 min for flow rates of 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7 mL/min, respectively. Using methanol-water was inappropriate for determining Lithol Rubine B under our analytical conditions because the acetonitrile content in the mobile phase affects capacity factors and sensitivity. In most reversed-phase-HPLC separations of highly unipolar colorants, broad, tailing peaks are obtained. A flow rate of 0.5 mL/min and acetonitrile-water were, therefore, used to determine Lithol Rubine B. The linear slope (5.3641) of the Sb/Ag electrode was higher than that (1.3568) of the GCE (Figure1). LC-ECD chromatograms of Lithol Rubine B azo dye at various working electrodes (a GCE, a bare Ag electrode, and an Sb/Ag electrode). Figure 2 shows that the height of the reduction peak (0.3 μg/mL) of the Sb/Ag electrode was higher than those of the other electrodes (GCE: 1.0 μg/mL; bare Ag: 0.3 μg/mL). Sb/Ag film gave a better performance than the others did; therefore, we used the Sb/Ag electrode to determine Lithol Rubine B levels in cosmetic products.Figure 2
LC-ECD chromatograms of Lithol Rubine B azo dye at various working electrodes; (a) at GCE with Lithol Rubine B 1.0μg/mL; (b) at Ag wire with Lithol Rubine B 0.3 μg/mL; (c) at Sb/Ag with Lithol Rubine B 0.3 μg/mL. Stationary phase, HyperClone C18 column (particle size 5-μm, 250 mm × 4.6 i.d.); mobile phase, acetonitrile-water (30 : 70, v/v) containing 0.1 mM K2HPO4 (pH 3.97); flow rate 0.5 mL/min. Electrode potential was at −0.6 V versus the Ag/AgCl reference electrode.To determine the optimum applied potential for electrochemical detection, after the LC analysis, hydrodynamic voltammograms were constructed for Lithol Rubine B (Figure3). The voltammetric detector was operated at −0.6 V. Using the injection valve, 20 μl of the prepared sample solution and of the standard solution were chromatographed under the operating conditions described above. The calibration curve showed good linearity over the range 0.0188–1.203 μg/mL; the regression equation was y=430x+150, and the correlation coefficient was r=0.9997. The detection limit of our method was approximately 2.0 ng/mL. Quantitation was based on the peak area of the sample.Figure 3
Hydrodynamic voltammogram obtained for Lithol Rubine B (1.50 ng) using the Sb/Ag detector. Stationary phase, HyperClone C18 column (particle size 5-μm, 250 mm × 4.6 i.d.); mobile phase, acetonitrile-water (30 : 70, v/v) containing 0.1 mM K2HPO4 (pH 3.97); flow rate 0.5 mL/min.


### 3.3. Sensor Stability

The operational stability of the bare Ag and Sb/Ag sensors was tested and compared by continuously exposing them to the flow stream, and by monitoring the amperometric response (at −0.6 V versus Ag/AgCl) of acetonitrile-water (30 : 70, v/v) containing 0.1 mM K2HPO4 (pH 3.97) over several hours of repetitive injections. Scanning electron microscope (SEM; at 15 kV) images of 4 mM antimony (Sb) particles distributed (Figure 4(a)) at the bare Ag working electrode surface (0.3 mm i.d.) as the working electrode in the flow cell after (b) 0 h and (c) 6 h. Figure 4(c) illustrates the stability of the sensor after 6 h of repetitive injections.Scanning electron microscope SEM (at 15 kV) of antimony (Sb 4 mM) particles distributed at the Ag (0.3 mm i.d.) surface as the working electrode in the flow cell after: (a) bare Ag; (b) 0 hr; (c) 6 hr.
(a)(b)(c)


### 3.4. Precision and Accuracy

The calibration plots obtained by plotting the peak area against the concentration of Lithol Rubine B show good linearity over the range 10–80 mg/L. The regression equations werey=1.17x+0.387 (correlation coefficient r=0.9999); the range 0.30–1.2 mg/L and y=202x+10.0 (correlation coefficient r=0.9999) for LC-UV and LC-ED, respectively (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)). Subsequently, we developed a simple and sensitive green electrochemical procedure for determining Lithol Rubine B in real samples. Commercial lipstick was spiked with 0.1, 0.2, or 0.3 mg/L and then analyzed. The calibration plot (Figure 6) shows good linearity. Because it is less expensive than LC-UV analysis, HPLC should be done using a conventional variable wavelength detector to achieve some selectivity and close to the optimum sensitivity of all the colorants. Thus, our proposed analytical method offers a valid and economical alternative to LC-UV detection of Lithol Rubine B.Chromatograms obtained to produce calibration graph for Lithol Rubine B (a) LC-UV, (b) LC-EC. Stationary phase, HyperClone C18 column (particle size 5-μm, 250 mm × 4.6 i.d.); mobile phase, acetonitrile-water (30 : 70, v/v) containing 0.1 mM K2HPO4 (pH 3.97); flow rate 0.5 mL/min. Electrode potential was at −0.6 V versus the Ag/AgCl reference electrode, ultraviolet detector set at 235 nm.
(a)(b)Figure 6
Chromatograms for Lithol Rubine B from commercial lipstick at Sb/Ag electrode. Peaks 1, 0 mg/L lipstick added; 2, 0.150 mg/L lipstick added; 3, 0.300 mg/L lipstick added. Analysis conditions are identical to those listed in Figure5.


### 3.5. Application to Lithol Rubine B

Our proposed LC-EC method was used to determine Lithol Rubine B in cosmetic products. Chromatograms of a comparison of LC-UV (Figure7(a)) and LC-EC (Figure 7(b)) for Lithol Rubine B in cosmetics show that the sensitivity for the Lithol Rubine B investigated was about two orders of a magnitude higher with LC-EC than with LC-UV detection; however, there were no significant differences in the values obtained using both types of analysis (Table 1).Table 1
Analytical results of the determination of Lithol Rubine B in commercial cosmetics by liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection (LC-EC) and ultraviolet detection (LC-UV).
SamplesConcentration (%, w/w)Lithol Rubine BLC-ECLC-UVN=3aRouge0.104 (2.0 %)b0.119 (1.3 %)Lipstick0.250 (1.2 %)0.220 (1.0 %)Nail preparation0.300 (2.1 %)0.310 (2.3 %)aNumber of determinations.bValues in parentheses indicate R. S. D.Figure 7
Chromatograms obtained by LC-UV (a) and LC-ECD (b) from commercial cosmetics. Analysis conditions are identical to those listed in Figure5.


## 3.1. Voltammetric Measurement

Azo linkages are reducible; a typical two-electron, two-proton reduction was found for azobenzene [26]. Azobenzene undergoes a fast ECEC reduction to hydrazobenzene which is then oxidized at approximately the same potential as azobenzene is reduced [27]. Azobenzene was reduced to the corresponding anilines using controlled potential coulometry since the initially formed intermediate hydrazobenzene decomposes to aniline. The proposed pathway for the electrochemical reduction of Lithol Rubine B is shown in Scheme 2. For both the GCE and the Sb/Ag electrodes, good linearity was observed between the peak height (current) and the square root of the scan rate (Figure 1). The peak potential became more negative as the scan rate increased. These results showed that the electrode mechanism of Lithol Rubine B is EC reduction.Scheme 2
Proposed pathway of the electrochemical reduction of Lithol Rubine B.Figure 1
Magnitude of the peak current,ip, as a function of square root of scan rate for Lithol Rubine B (3.85 × 10−4 mol/L) reduction at Sb/Ag and GCE in 0.1 M acetate acid buffer (pH 4.50).


## 3.2. Optimization LC Analysis

Two different eluents, methanol-water (30 : 70, v/v) and acetonitrile-water (30 : 70, v/v) containing 0.1 mM of K2HPO4 (pH 4.08) as the mobile phases of both solvent systems, were investigated at various flow rates. The retention times of acetonitrile-water were 9.8, 5.3, and 4.6 min for flow rates of 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7 mL/min, respectively. Using methanol-water was inappropriate for determining Lithol Rubine B under our analytical conditions because the acetonitrile content in the mobile phase affects capacity factors and sensitivity. In most reversed-phase-HPLC separations of highly unipolar colorants, broad, tailing peaks are obtained. A flow rate of 0.5 mL/min and acetonitrile-water were, therefore, used to determine Lithol Rubine B. The linear slope (5.3641) of the Sb/Ag electrode was higher than that (1.3568) of the GCE (Figure1). LC-ECD chromatograms of Lithol Rubine B azo dye at various working electrodes (a GCE, a bare Ag electrode, and an Sb/Ag electrode). Figure 2 shows that the height of the reduction peak (0.3 μg/mL) of the Sb/Ag electrode was higher than those of the other electrodes (GCE: 1.0 μg/mL; bare Ag: 0.3 μg/mL). Sb/Ag film gave a better performance than the others did; therefore, we used the Sb/Ag electrode to determine Lithol Rubine B levels in cosmetic products.Figure 2
LC-ECD chromatograms of Lithol Rubine B azo dye at various working electrodes; (a) at GCE with Lithol Rubine B 1.0μg/mL; (b) at Ag wire with Lithol Rubine B 0.3 μg/mL; (c) at Sb/Ag with Lithol Rubine B 0.3 μg/mL. Stationary phase, HyperClone C18 column (particle size 5-μm, 250 mm × 4.6 i.d.); mobile phase, acetonitrile-water (30 : 70, v/v) containing 0.1 mM K2HPO4 (pH 3.97); flow rate 0.5 mL/min. Electrode potential was at −0.6 V versus the Ag/AgCl reference electrode.To determine the optimum applied potential for electrochemical detection, after the LC analysis, hydrodynamic voltammograms were constructed for Lithol Rubine B (Figure3). The voltammetric detector was operated at −0.6 V. Using the injection valve, 20 μl of the prepared sample solution and of the standard solution were chromatographed under the operating conditions described above. The calibration curve showed good linearity over the range 0.0188–1.203 μg/mL; the regression equation was y=430x+150, and the correlation coefficient was r=0.9997. The detection limit of our method was approximately 2.0 ng/mL. Quantitation was based on the peak area of the sample.Figure 3
Hydrodynamic voltammogram obtained for Lithol Rubine B (1.50 ng) using the Sb/Ag detector. Stationary phase, HyperClone C18 column (particle size 5-μm, 250 mm × 4.6 i.d.); mobile phase, acetonitrile-water (30 : 70, v/v) containing 0.1 mM K2HPO4 (pH 3.97); flow rate 0.5 mL/min.


## 3.3. Sensor Stability

The operational stability of the bare Ag and Sb/Ag sensors was tested and compared by continuously exposing them to the flow stream, and by monitoring the amperometric response (at −0.6 V versus Ag/AgCl) of acetonitrile-water (30 : 70, v/v) containing 0.1 mM K2HPO4 (pH 3.97) over several hours of repetitive injections. Scanning electron microscope (SEM; at 15 kV) images of 4 mM antimony (Sb) particles distributed (Figure 4(a)) at the bare Ag working electrode surface (0.3 mm i.d.) as the working electrode in the flow cell after (b) 0 h and (c) 6 h. Figure 4(c) illustrates the stability of the sensor after 6 h of repetitive injections.Scanning electron microscope SEM (at 15 kV) of antimony (Sb 4 mM) particles distributed at the Ag (0.3 mm i.d.) surface as the working electrode in the flow cell after: (a) bare Ag; (b) 0 hr; (c) 6 hr.
(a)(b)(c)


## 3.4. Precision and Accuracy

The calibration plots obtained by plotting the peak area against the concentration of Lithol Rubine B show good linearity over the range 10–80 mg/L. The regression equations werey=1.17x+0.387 (correlation coefficient r=0.9999); the range 0.30–1.2 mg/L and y=202x+10.0 (correlation coefficient r=0.9999) for LC-UV and LC-ED, respectively (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)). Subsequently, we developed a simple and sensitive green electrochemical procedure for determining Lithol Rubine B in real samples. Commercial lipstick was spiked with 0.1, 0.2, or 0.3 mg/L and then analyzed. The calibration plot (Figure 6) shows good linearity. Because it is less expensive than LC-UV analysis, HPLC should be done using a conventional variable wavelength detector to achieve some selectivity and close to the optimum sensitivity of all the colorants. Thus, our proposed analytical method offers a valid and economical alternative to LC-UV detection of Lithol Rubine B.Chromatograms obtained to produce calibration graph for Lithol Rubine B (a) LC-UV, (b) LC-EC. Stationary phase, HyperClone C18 column (particle size 5-μm, 250 mm × 4.6 i.d.); mobile phase, acetonitrile-water (30 : 70, v/v) containing 0.1 mM K2HPO4 (pH 3.97); flow rate 0.5 mL/min. Electrode potential was at −0.6 V versus the Ag/AgCl reference electrode, ultraviolet detector set at 235 nm.
(a)(b)Figure 6
Chromatograms for Lithol Rubine B from commercial lipstick at Sb/Ag electrode. Peaks 1, 0 mg/L lipstick added; 2, 0.150 mg/L lipstick added; 3, 0.300 mg/L lipstick added. Analysis conditions are identical to those listed in Figure5.


## 3.5. Application to Lithol Rubine B

Our proposed LC-EC method was used to determine Lithol Rubine B in cosmetic products. Chromatograms of a comparison of LC-UV (Figure7(a)) and LC-EC (Figure 7(b)) for Lithol Rubine B in cosmetics show that the sensitivity for the Lithol Rubine B investigated was about two orders of a magnitude higher with LC-EC than with LC-UV detection; however, there were no significant differences in the values obtained using both types of analysis (Table 1).Table 1
Analytical results of the determination of Lithol Rubine B in commercial cosmetics by liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection (LC-EC) and ultraviolet detection (LC-UV).
SamplesConcentration (%, w/w)Lithol Rubine BLC-ECLC-UVN=3aRouge0.104 (2.0 %)b0.119 (1.3 %)Lipstick0.250 (1.2 %)0.220 (1.0 %)Nail preparation0.300 (2.1 %)0.310 (2.3 %)aNumber of determinations.bValues in parentheses indicate R. S. D.Figure 7
Chromatograms obtained by LC-UV (a) and LC-ECD (b) from commercial cosmetics. Analysis conditions are identical to those listed in Figure5.


## 4. Conclusions

We constructed an antimony-modified silver electrode to use as an electrocatalytic sensor liquid chromatography-electrochemical (LC-EC) detection and flow-injection analysis (FIA) determination of Lithol Rubine B in cosmetics. The electrode not only exhibited catalytic activity toward this analyte, but also provided a stable, quantitatively reproducible performance in the chromatographic stream. Thus, the proposed analytical method offers a valid, and economical, alternative to UV detection and mass spectrometry detection of Lithol Rubine B.



---

*Source: 896978-2011-04-05.xml*