# The Relationship betweenHelicobacter pylori Infection of the Gallbladder and Chronic Cholecystitis and Cholelithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors: Liang Wang; Junyin Chen; Wenxi Jiang; Li Cen; Jiaqi Pan; Chaohui Yu; Youming Li; Weixing Chen; Chunxiao Chen; Zhe Shen
Journal: Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is proved to be the main pathogenic agent of various diseases, including chronic gastritis, gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, and gastric cancer. In addition, chronic cholecystitis and cholelithiasis are common worldwide, which are supposed to increase the total mortality of patients. Epidemiologic evidence on the relationship between H. pylori infection of the gallbladder and chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis still remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of overall studies to investigate the relationship between H. pylori infection of the gallbladder and chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis. Two researchers searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to obtain all related and eligible studies published before July 2020. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by the random-effects model. Subgroup analysis, heterogeneity, publication bias, and sensitivity analysis were also conducted. Twenty studies were included in the meta-analysis, involving 1735 participants and 1197 patients with chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis. Helicobacter species infection of the gallbladder was positively correlated with increased risk of chronic cholecystitis and cholelithiasis, especially H. pylori (OR = 3.05; 95% CI, 1.81–5.14; I2 = 23.5%). Besides, country-based subgroup analysis also showed a positive correlation between the gallbladder H. pylori positivity and chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis risk. For Asian and non-Asian country studies, the ORs were 4.30 (95% CI, 1.76–10.50; I2 = 37.4%) and 2.13 (95% CI, 1.23–3.70; I2 = 0.0%), respectively. The association was more obvious using the bile sample and urease gene primer. In conclusion, this meta-analysis provided evidence that there is a positive correlation between H. pylori infection in the gallbladder and increased risk of chronic cholecystitis and cholelithiasis.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a Gram-negative, spiral-shaped, and microaerophilic microorganism, which is proved to be the main pathogenic agent in the occurrence and development of chronic gastritis, gastric ulcer, and duodenal ulcer [1]. Furthermore, H. pylori is also associated with an increased risk of gastric malignant lymphoma of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) as well as gastric adenocarcinoma [2–4].Chronic cholecystitis and cholelithiasis are quite widespread worldwide. Geography and especially ethnicity play an important role in the prevalence of gallstone diseases. The prevalence rate in the west is higher than that in the east, ranging from 4% to 74% [5]. Recently, some studies indicated that people with gallstone diseases had increased total mortality and cardiovascular disease and cancer mortality [6, 7]. Besides, since chronic inflammation is caused by repeated trauma to the gallbladder mucosa and DNA damage led by high or abnormal bile acid exposure, gallstones are closely related to the development of hepatobiliary cancers, including gallbladder cancer [8]. Therefore, chronic cholecystitis and cholelithiasis constitute a serious health problem, which brings a great medical burden to the society.Since Chang et al. [9] incidentally discovered H. pylori in the gallbladder’s mucosa of a patient with cholecystitis in 1996, more and more studies have detected various Helicobacter species including H. pylori, H. bilis, H. hepaticus, H. pullorum, and H. ganmani in the gallbladder tissue, gallstone, and bile taken from the gallbladder [10, 11]. Among these various Helicobacter species, H. pylori is the commonest one. The high prevalence of H. pylori in the group of patients with chronic cholecystitis raises questions concerning about the role of H. pylori infection in chronic cholecystitis. During the formation of gallstones, there are many etiological factors. Also, among them, infection, inflammation, and the immune system play a vital role [12]. Recently, increasing studies pointed that the gut microbiome participated in gallstone formation by reducing bile acid metabolism and affecting the dynamic equilibrium [13, 14]. H. pylori is one of them.Therefore, a series of studies have been carried out to find the relationship between gallbladderH. pylori infection and chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis [15–34]. Karagin et al. [28] supported the role of H. pylori in the development of cholecystitis in humans. Also, Dar et al. [32] pointed an association between the presence of H. pylori and hepatobiliary stone diseases. However, in a study conducted by Fallone et al. [35], they found no H. pylori present in any of the patients diagnosed with gallstones, thus raising doubt as to the possible association between H. pylori and gallstone diseases.Consequently, the relationship betweenH. pylori infection in the gallbladder and cholecystitis/cholelithiasis still remains unclear, with controversial results reported in various studies. We perform this meta-analysis aiming to review data from related studies to evaluate the potential association between H. pylori infection in the gallbladder and chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis.


## 2. Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted based on the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) statement guidelines [36].


### 2.1. Search Strategy

We searched for relevant studies from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The last search was in July 2020. The retrieval strategy used was as follows: ((Helicobacter pylori) or (Campylobacter pylori) OR (H. pylori) OR (HP) OR (Helicobacter) OR (Helicobacter bilis) OR (Helicobacter hepaticus) OR (Helicobacter pullorum) OR (H. bilis) OR (H. hepaticus) OR (H. pullorum) OR (H. ganmani) OR (Helicobacter species) OR (Helicobacter sp.) OR (Helicobacter genus) OR Campylobacter OR (Campylobacter infection) OR Campylobacteriosis OR (Helicobacter pylori infection) OR (Helicobacter infection) OR (pylori) OR (enterohepatic Helicobacter spp.) OR (Campylobacter spp.)) AND (cholelithiasis or cholecystolithiasis or gallstone∗ OR gall∗stone∗ OR (gallbladder AND stone∗) OR (gallbladder AND cholelith) OR (gallbladder AND lithiasis) OR bilestone∗ OR (bile AND stone∗) OR (bile AND lithiasis) OR (bile AND cholelith) OR (biliary AND calculus) OR (biliary AND stone∗) OR (biliary AND cholelith) OR (biliary AND lithiasis) OR cholecystitis). We also supplemented eligible studies from the references in the review articles by manual retrieval.


### 2.2. Eligibility Criteria

The inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) original cross-sectional studies, cohort studies, or case-control studies which are about the relationship between chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis andHelicobacter species infection of the gallbladder, (2) papers in which the method of detecting Helicobacter species infection was polymerase chain reaction (PCR), (3) papers that provide sufficient information to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and (4) published in English as a full paper before July 2020.The exclusion criteria are as follows: (1) reviews, meta-analysis, letters, commentaries, case reports, and animal studies, (2) studies that had no control group or inappropriate control group, and (3) duplicate study samples.


### 2.3. Data Extraction and Quality Assessment

Two investigators extracted the following data from each study in a standardized manner, independently: first author’s name, publication year, country, study population and demographic data (e.g., gender and age), biliary diseases, the detection method forHelicobacter species, sample, specific primer, Helicobacter species, as well as the number of cases and controls.The quality of each study included was also independently assessed by two investigators according to the 9-star Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale [37], the content of which is as follows: (1) the selection of cases and controls, (2) the comparability of cases and controls, and (3) the assessment of exposure.Any discrepancies on data extraction or quality assessment were resolved through discussion.


### 2.4. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted with Stata statistical software (version 12.0; College Station, Texas 77845, USA) by two authors, independently. Also, we used a random-effect model to calculate the summarized ORs with 95% CIs considering the diversity among various studies due to different study designs, methodologies, and populations.The standard chi-square test was performed to assess statistical heterogeneity between studies, and the result was quantified byI2. Values of I2 < 25%, 25–50%, and >75% indicate low, medium, and high heterogeneity, respectively. When highly heterogeneous outcome was observed, sensitivity analysis was performed to investigate the influence of the individual study and the stability of results.Because of the regional differences in the prevalence ofH. pylori infection [38], we also conducted a subgroup analysis of studies from Asian and non-Asian countries in order to reduce regional interference in the study. We also performed subgroup analyses of samples and primers for detecting H. pylori.


### 2.5. Assessment of Bias and Sensitivity Analysis

Publication bias was assessed by funnel scatter-plots, Begg’s adjusted rank correlation, and Egger’s regression asymmetry tests. Publication bias will lead to asymmetry in funnel plots. Also, for Begg’s and Egger’s test,P<0.05 was considered to indicate potential publication bias.As for sensitivity analysis, leave-one-out sensitivity and stratified analysis were also carried out to investigate the influence of the individual study and the stability of results.


## 2.1. Search Strategy

We searched for relevant studies from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The last search was in July 2020. The retrieval strategy used was as follows: ((Helicobacter pylori) or (Campylobacter pylori) OR (H. pylori) OR (HP) OR (Helicobacter) OR (Helicobacter bilis) OR (Helicobacter hepaticus) OR (Helicobacter pullorum) OR (H. bilis) OR (H. hepaticus) OR (H. pullorum) OR (H. ganmani) OR (Helicobacter species) OR (Helicobacter sp.) OR (Helicobacter genus) OR Campylobacter OR (Campylobacter infection) OR Campylobacteriosis OR (Helicobacter pylori infection) OR (Helicobacter infection) OR (pylori) OR (enterohepatic Helicobacter spp.) OR (Campylobacter spp.)) AND (cholelithiasis or cholecystolithiasis or gallstone∗ OR gall∗stone∗ OR (gallbladder AND stone∗) OR (gallbladder AND cholelith) OR (gallbladder AND lithiasis) OR bilestone∗ OR (bile AND stone∗) OR (bile AND lithiasis) OR (bile AND cholelith) OR (biliary AND calculus) OR (biliary AND stone∗) OR (biliary AND cholelith) OR (biliary AND lithiasis) OR cholecystitis). We also supplemented eligible studies from the references in the review articles by manual retrieval.


## 2.2. Eligibility Criteria

The inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) original cross-sectional studies, cohort studies, or case-control studies which are about the relationship between chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis andHelicobacter species infection of the gallbladder, (2) papers in which the method of detecting Helicobacter species infection was polymerase chain reaction (PCR), (3) papers that provide sufficient information to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and (4) published in English as a full paper before July 2020.The exclusion criteria are as follows: (1) reviews, meta-analysis, letters, commentaries, case reports, and animal studies, (2) studies that had no control group or inappropriate control group, and (3) duplicate study samples.


## 2.3. Data Extraction and Quality Assessment

Two investigators extracted the following data from each study in a standardized manner, independently: first author’s name, publication year, country, study population and demographic data (e.g., gender and age), biliary diseases, the detection method forHelicobacter species, sample, specific primer, Helicobacter species, as well as the number of cases and controls.The quality of each study included was also independently assessed by two investigators according to the 9-star Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale [37], the content of which is as follows: (1) the selection of cases and controls, (2) the comparability of cases and controls, and (3) the assessment of exposure.Any discrepancies on data extraction or quality assessment were resolved through discussion.


## 2.4. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted with Stata statistical software (version 12.0; College Station, Texas 77845, USA) by two authors, independently. Also, we used a random-effect model to calculate the summarized ORs with 95% CIs considering the diversity among various studies due to different study designs, methodologies, and populations.The standard chi-square test was performed to assess statistical heterogeneity between studies, and the result was quantified byI2. Values of I2 < 25%, 25–50%, and >75% indicate low, medium, and high heterogeneity, respectively. When highly heterogeneous outcome was observed, sensitivity analysis was performed to investigate the influence of the individual study and the stability of results.Because of the regional differences in the prevalence ofH. pylori infection [38], we also conducted a subgroup analysis of studies from Asian and non-Asian countries in order to reduce regional interference in the study. We also performed subgroup analyses of samples and primers for detecting H. pylori.


## 2.5. Assessment of Bias and Sensitivity Analysis

Publication bias was assessed by funnel scatter-plots, Begg’s adjusted rank correlation, and Egger’s regression asymmetry tests. Publication bias will lead to asymmetry in funnel plots. Also, for Begg’s and Egger’s test,P<0.05 was considered to indicate potential publication bias.As for sensitivity analysis, leave-one-out sensitivity and stratified analysis were also carried out to investigate the influence of the individual study and the stability of results.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Description of the Studies

The search strategy yielded 826 publications, of which 202 were from PubMed, 611 were from Embase, and 13 were from the Cochrane Library. Of these records, 193 were excluded as duplicate articles and 494 were excluded as irrelevant on the basis of title and abstract. 139 were reviewed for detailed assessment. Of these publications, 119 were excluded from our final analysis, and the reasons are listed in Figure1. Besides, 2 articles by Bulajic et al. [16, 17] were included in our meta-analysis due to the independence of the sample. Eventually, 20 studies, published between 2000 and 2018, were included in our meta-analysis.Figure 1
Flow diagram of the systematic review of the literature.The main characteristics of the included studies are listed in Table1. The selected 20 studies included a total size of 1735 participants, of which 1197 were for the case group and 538 were for the control one. Of these studies, 11 of them were conducted in Asia (Japan, India, Thailand, Iran, Pakistan, and Russia) and 9 studies were conducted in non-Asian areas (German, Serbia, Brazil, Greece, Sweden, New Zealand, and Netherlands). There were totally 5 species of Helicobacter species including H. pylori, H. bilis, H. hepaticus, H. pullorum, and H. ganmani in our study. H. pylori was the commonest species which was identified in 17 studies. H. bilis was reported in 2 studies. H. hepaticus, H. pullorum, and H. ganmani each were reported in 1 study. Among the included studies, 12 studies used bile as sample, 5 studies used the gallbladder as sample, 2 studies used bile and the gallbladder as sample, and only 1 study used gallstone as sample. The specimens of bile, gallbladder tissue, and gallstone were obtained during cholecystectomy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), percutaneous transhepatic cholangio-drainage, endoscopic papillotomy, and regular operation of gastrectomy or hepatectomy. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to detect Helicobacter species infection, and the positive rate is 344/1735. The primer of target genes in the included studies varied. The 16S rRNA gene was the most commonly used primer and had been used in 12 studies. Urease gene was used as primer in 3 studies, and 26 kDa species-specific protein gene was used in 1 study. 3 other studies used two primers in combination.Table 1
Main characteristics of the included studies in this meta-analysis.
AuthorYearCountryGender, M/FAge, years (mean age ± SD) (range age)Biliary diseasesSamplesSpecific primersHelicobacter speciesCasesControlsNos.Bahri Abayli et al.2005Turkey28/49M: 50 (25–73)F: 54 (24–80)Cholelithiasis, cholecystitisGallstone16S rRNA geneH. pylori77206Cíntia Presser Silva et al.2003Brazil27/37Cases: 51.5 ± 16.4 (21–80); controls: 38.3 ± 17.4 (18–70)CholelithiasisBile, gallbladder16S rRNA geneH. pylori46187Isaeva Aeva et al.2018Russia37/77Cases: cholecystitis 42.6 ± 4.8, cholelithiasis 57.1 ± 3.6; controls: 42.9 ± 3.4Cholelithiasis, cholecystitisBile ducts, gallbladderUrease C geneH. pylori84306Griniatsos et al.2009Greece22/6763 (51–73)CholelithiasisGallbladder16S rRNA geneH. pylori89427Kenichi Harada et al.2001JapanNoneNoneCholelithiasisBile16S rRNA geneH. pylori3996Milutin Bulajic et al.2002Serbia32/4056.7 ± 16.45CholelithiasisBileUrease A geneH. pylori6576Milutin Bulajic et al.2002Serbia42/47NoneCholelithiasisBileUrease A gene, 16S rDNA geneH. pylori63117Mohammad Yousuf Dar et al.2016India29/46Cases: 40.5 ± 10.85 (18–75); controls: 37.3 ± 9.6 (18–54)CholelithiasisBile26 kDa surface antigenH. pylori50256Norio Matsukura et al.2002Japan, Thailand30/1565.2 (24–83)Cholelithiasis, cholecystitisBile16S rRNA geneH. bilis42147Farshad et al.2004IranNoneCases: 18–70; controls: 20–67Cholelithiasis, cholecystitisBile16S rRNA gene, isocitrate dehydrogenase geneH. pylori33406Somayeh Janani Sherafat et al.2012IranNoneNoneCholelithiasisBile16S rRNA geneH. pylori74136Takashi Kobayashi et al.2005JapanNoneNoneCholelithiasisBile16S rRNA geneH. pylori30217Toshihide Hamada et al.2009Japan43/49Cases: 61.2controls: 69.2Cholelithiasis, cholecystitisBile16S rRNA geneH. hepaticus60326Bohr et al.2007GermanNoneNoneCholelithiasisGallbladder16S rRNA geneH. ganmani57227Virinder Kumar Bansal et al.2012IndiaNoneNoneCholelithiasis, cholecystitisBileUrease A geneH. pylori49127Chen et al.2003New Zealand39/68Cases: symptomatic gallstones 47.4 (23.3–79.9); asymptomatic gallstones 50.6 (35.7–66.0); controls: 58.7 (23.2–74.4)CholelithiasisGallbladder16S rRNA geneH. pylori70376Roosendaal et al.2002NetherlandsNone73 (42–85)CholelithiasisBile16S rDNA geneH. pylori2837Seyed Masih Fatemi et al.2017Iran58/1946.85 ± 14.53Cholelithiasis, cholecystitisBileHsp60 gene, 16S rRNA geneH. pylori, H. bilis52257Karagin et al.2010Sweden79/113Cases: 48 (20–84); controls: 58 (11–85)CholecystitisGallbladder16S rRNA geneH. pylori, H. pullorum1001026Yakoob et al.2011Pakistan43/10149 ± 14 (18–84)Cholecystitis, cholelithiasisBile, gallbladder16S rRNA geneH. pylori89556M, male; F, female; NOS, Newcastle–Ottawa scale assessment.


### 3.2. Study Quality

Each study chosen for this meta-analysis was carefully assessed according to the Newcastle–Ottawa scale assessment. All studies obtained high scores, defined as ≥6 stars (Table1).


### 3.3. The General Analysis

Overall, as shown in Figure2, the pooled OR for patients with chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis compared with participants without chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis was 3.15 (95% CI, 2.01–4.93), indicating a potential positive association between gallbladder Helicobacter species infection and chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis risk. Also, there was low heterogeneity (I2 = 20.1%, P=0.205).Figure 2
Pooled ORs for the relationship betweenHelicobacter species infection of the gallbladder and chronic cholecystitis and cholelithiasis. The areas of the squares are proportional to the study sample sizes.Besides, we found a higher gallbladderH. pylori infection rate in the chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis group than that in the control group in 17 studies that focused on H. pylori (OR = 3.05; 95% CI, 1.81–5.14) (Table 2). For other Helicobacter species, studies concerned were limited (Table 2). In addition to H. pylori, a higher H. hepaticus infection rate in the chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis than that in the controls was also observed (41.7% vs. 12.5%, P=0.007). Although the prevalence of H. bilis was also higher in chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis (21.3% vs. 10.3%, P=0.273), the results had no statistically significant difference. H. pullorum and H. ganmani infection rates were low in both cases and controls (6.0% vs. 0.0%, P=0.073; 1.8% vs. 0.0%, P=0.914, respectively).Table 2
Prevalence ofHelicobacter species in this meta-analysis.
Helicobacter speciesPositive in casesPositive in controlsOR (95% CI)P valueH. pylori246/103834/4703.05 (1.81–5.14)0.000H. pullorum6/1000/10214.10 (0.78–253.71)0.073H. ganmani1/570/221.19 (0.05–30.43)0.914H. hepaticus25/604/325.00 (1.56–16.06)0.007H. bilis20/944/391.96 (0.59–6.55)0.273OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.


### 3.4. Subgroup Analysis forH. pylori Infection

ForH. pylori infection, subgroup analyses were conducted according to country, sample, and specific primer in Figure 3. Compared with overall results, there were no significant differences in subgroup studies. Gallbladder H. pylori infection was also positively correlated with the risk of chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis in both Asian and non-Asian groups. The ORs for Asian and non-Asian country studies were 4.30 (95% CI, 1.76–10.50; I2 = 37.4%) and 2.13 (95% CI, 1.23–3.70; I2 = 0.0%), respectively. In bile samples, the pooled OR was 3.78 (95% CI, 1.63–8.79), indicating a significantly higher detection rate in the chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis patients than that in the control group. In gallbladder samples, although the pooled OR was 2.03 (95% CI, 0.65–6.40), the result had no statistically significant difference (P=0.226). Only 1 study used the gallstone as the sample, and the result had no statistically significant difference (P=0.377). The ORs of 16S rRNA gene and urease gene were 2.27 (95% CI, 1.25–4.13) and 10.18 (95% CI, 2.31–44.80), respectively. Only 1 study used 26 kDa protein gene.Figure 3
Pooled ORs for the relationship betweenH. pylori infection of the gallbladder and chronic cholecystitis and cholelithiasis: (a) subgroup based on country; (b) subgroup based on sample; (c) subgroup based on specific primer. The areas of the squares are proportional to the study sample sizes.
(a)(b)(c)


### 3.5. Assessment of Bias and Sensitivity Analysis

As shown in Figure4, funnel plot is relatively symmetrical, suggesting no strong evidence for publication bias. In addition, there was no evidence for bias using either Begg’s method (P=0.974) or Egger’s weighted regression method (P=0.268).Figure 4
Funnel plot. The distribution of dots is relatively symmetrical, suggesting no strong evidence or publication bias.All the results remained significant when leave-one-out sensitivity analyses were conducted, indicating the stability of results for this meta-analysis.


## 3.1. Description of the Studies

The search strategy yielded 826 publications, of which 202 were from PubMed, 611 were from Embase, and 13 were from the Cochrane Library. Of these records, 193 were excluded as duplicate articles and 494 were excluded as irrelevant on the basis of title and abstract. 139 were reviewed for detailed assessment. Of these publications, 119 were excluded from our final analysis, and the reasons are listed in Figure1. Besides, 2 articles by Bulajic et al. [16, 17] were included in our meta-analysis due to the independence of the sample. Eventually, 20 studies, published between 2000 and 2018, were included in our meta-analysis.Figure 1
Flow diagram of the systematic review of the literature.The main characteristics of the included studies are listed in Table1. The selected 20 studies included a total size of 1735 participants, of which 1197 were for the case group and 538 were for the control one. Of these studies, 11 of them were conducted in Asia (Japan, India, Thailand, Iran, Pakistan, and Russia) and 9 studies were conducted in non-Asian areas (German, Serbia, Brazil, Greece, Sweden, New Zealand, and Netherlands). There were totally 5 species of Helicobacter species including H. pylori, H. bilis, H. hepaticus, H. pullorum, and H. ganmani in our study. H. pylori was the commonest species which was identified in 17 studies. H. bilis was reported in 2 studies. H. hepaticus, H. pullorum, and H. ganmani each were reported in 1 study. Among the included studies, 12 studies used bile as sample, 5 studies used the gallbladder as sample, 2 studies used bile and the gallbladder as sample, and only 1 study used gallstone as sample. The specimens of bile, gallbladder tissue, and gallstone were obtained during cholecystectomy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), percutaneous transhepatic cholangio-drainage, endoscopic papillotomy, and regular operation of gastrectomy or hepatectomy. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to detect Helicobacter species infection, and the positive rate is 344/1735. The primer of target genes in the included studies varied. The 16S rRNA gene was the most commonly used primer and had been used in 12 studies. Urease gene was used as primer in 3 studies, and 26 kDa species-specific protein gene was used in 1 study. 3 other studies used two primers in combination.Table 1
Main characteristics of the included studies in this meta-analysis.
AuthorYearCountryGender, M/FAge, years (mean age ± SD) (range age)Biliary diseasesSamplesSpecific primersHelicobacter speciesCasesControlsNos.Bahri Abayli et al.2005Turkey28/49M: 50 (25–73)F: 54 (24–80)Cholelithiasis, cholecystitisGallstone16S rRNA geneH. pylori77206Cíntia Presser Silva et al.2003Brazil27/37Cases: 51.5 ± 16.4 (21–80); controls: 38.3 ± 17.4 (18–70)CholelithiasisBile, gallbladder16S rRNA geneH. pylori46187Isaeva Aeva et al.2018Russia37/77Cases: cholecystitis 42.6 ± 4.8, cholelithiasis 57.1 ± 3.6; controls: 42.9 ± 3.4Cholelithiasis, cholecystitisBile ducts, gallbladderUrease C geneH. pylori84306Griniatsos et al.2009Greece22/6763 (51–73)CholelithiasisGallbladder16S rRNA geneH. pylori89427Kenichi Harada et al.2001JapanNoneNoneCholelithiasisBile16S rRNA geneH. pylori3996Milutin Bulajic et al.2002Serbia32/4056.7 ± 16.45CholelithiasisBileUrease A geneH. pylori6576Milutin Bulajic et al.2002Serbia42/47NoneCholelithiasisBileUrease A gene, 16S rDNA geneH. pylori63117Mohammad Yousuf Dar et al.2016India29/46Cases: 40.5 ± 10.85 (18–75); controls: 37.3 ± 9.6 (18–54)CholelithiasisBile26 kDa surface antigenH. pylori50256Norio Matsukura et al.2002Japan, Thailand30/1565.2 (24–83)Cholelithiasis, cholecystitisBile16S rRNA geneH. bilis42147Farshad et al.2004IranNoneCases: 18–70; controls: 20–67Cholelithiasis, cholecystitisBile16S rRNA gene, isocitrate dehydrogenase geneH. pylori33406Somayeh Janani Sherafat et al.2012IranNoneNoneCholelithiasisBile16S rRNA geneH. pylori74136Takashi Kobayashi et al.2005JapanNoneNoneCholelithiasisBile16S rRNA geneH. pylori30217Toshihide Hamada et al.2009Japan43/49Cases: 61.2controls: 69.2Cholelithiasis, cholecystitisBile16S rRNA geneH. hepaticus60326Bohr et al.2007GermanNoneNoneCholelithiasisGallbladder16S rRNA geneH. ganmani57227Virinder Kumar Bansal et al.2012IndiaNoneNoneCholelithiasis, cholecystitisBileUrease A geneH. pylori49127Chen et al.2003New Zealand39/68Cases: symptomatic gallstones 47.4 (23.3–79.9); asymptomatic gallstones 50.6 (35.7–66.0); controls: 58.7 (23.2–74.4)CholelithiasisGallbladder16S rRNA geneH. pylori70376Roosendaal et al.2002NetherlandsNone73 (42–85)CholelithiasisBile16S rDNA geneH. pylori2837Seyed Masih Fatemi et al.2017Iran58/1946.85 ± 14.53Cholelithiasis, cholecystitisBileHsp60 gene, 16S rRNA geneH. pylori, H. bilis52257Karagin et al.2010Sweden79/113Cases: 48 (20–84); controls: 58 (11–85)CholecystitisGallbladder16S rRNA geneH. pylori, H. pullorum1001026Yakoob et al.2011Pakistan43/10149 ± 14 (18–84)Cholecystitis, cholelithiasisBile, gallbladder16S rRNA geneH. pylori89556M, male; F, female; NOS, Newcastle–Ottawa scale assessment.


## 3.2. Study Quality

Each study chosen for this meta-analysis was carefully assessed according to the Newcastle–Ottawa scale assessment. All studies obtained high scores, defined as ≥6 stars (Table1).


## 3.3. The General Analysis

Overall, as shown in Figure2, the pooled OR for patients with chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis compared with participants without chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis was 3.15 (95% CI, 2.01–4.93), indicating a potential positive association between gallbladder Helicobacter species infection and chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis risk. Also, there was low heterogeneity (I2 = 20.1%, P=0.205).Figure 2
Pooled ORs for the relationship betweenHelicobacter species infection of the gallbladder and chronic cholecystitis and cholelithiasis. The areas of the squares are proportional to the study sample sizes.Besides, we found a higher gallbladderH. pylori infection rate in the chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis group than that in the control group in 17 studies that focused on H. pylori (OR = 3.05; 95% CI, 1.81–5.14) (Table 2). For other Helicobacter species, studies concerned were limited (Table 2). In addition to H. pylori, a higher H. hepaticus infection rate in the chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis than that in the controls was also observed (41.7% vs. 12.5%, P=0.007). Although the prevalence of H. bilis was also higher in chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis (21.3% vs. 10.3%, P=0.273), the results had no statistically significant difference. H. pullorum and H. ganmani infection rates were low in both cases and controls (6.0% vs. 0.0%, P=0.073; 1.8% vs. 0.0%, P=0.914, respectively).Table 2
Prevalence ofHelicobacter species in this meta-analysis.
Helicobacter speciesPositive in casesPositive in controlsOR (95% CI)P valueH. pylori246/103834/4703.05 (1.81–5.14)0.000H. pullorum6/1000/10214.10 (0.78–253.71)0.073H. ganmani1/570/221.19 (0.05–30.43)0.914H. hepaticus25/604/325.00 (1.56–16.06)0.007H. bilis20/944/391.96 (0.59–6.55)0.273OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.


## 3.4. Subgroup Analysis forH. pylori Infection

ForH. pylori infection, subgroup analyses were conducted according to country, sample, and specific primer in Figure 3. Compared with overall results, there were no significant differences in subgroup studies. Gallbladder H. pylori infection was also positively correlated with the risk of chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis in both Asian and non-Asian groups. The ORs for Asian and non-Asian country studies were 4.30 (95% CI, 1.76–10.50; I2 = 37.4%) and 2.13 (95% CI, 1.23–3.70; I2 = 0.0%), respectively. In bile samples, the pooled OR was 3.78 (95% CI, 1.63–8.79), indicating a significantly higher detection rate in the chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis patients than that in the control group. In gallbladder samples, although the pooled OR was 2.03 (95% CI, 0.65–6.40), the result had no statistically significant difference (P=0.226). Only 1 study used the gallstone as the sample, and the result had no statistically significant difference (P=0.377). The ORs of 16S rRNA gene and urease gene were 2.27 (95% CI, 1.25–4.13) and 10.18 (95% CI, 2.31–44.80), respectively. Only 1 study used 26 kDa protein gene.Figure 3
Pooled ORs for the relationship betweenH. pylori infection of the gallbladder and chronic cholecystitis and cholelithiasis: (a) subgroup based on country; (b) subgroup based on sample; (c) subgroup based on specific primer. The areas of the squares are proportional to the study sample sizes.
(a)(b)(c)


## 3.5. Assessment of Bias and Sensitivity Analysis

As shown in Figure4, funnel plot is relatively symmetrical, suggesting no strong evidence for publication bias. In addition, there was no evidence for bias using either Begg’s method (P=0.974) or Egger’s weighted regression method (P=0.268).Figure 4
Funnel plot. The distribution of dots is relatively symmetrical, suggesting no strong evidence or publication bias.All the results remained significant when leave-one-out sensitivity analyses were conducted, indicating the stability of results for this meta-analysis.


## 4. Discussion

SinceHelicobacter species was detected from the gallbladder tissue, gallstone, and bile taken from the gallbladder, numerous studies have shown that Helicobacter species, especially H. pylori, may contribute to the formation of cholesterol gallstones [39]. However, research studies conducted so far have failed to establish a definite relationship between H. pylori infection and gallstone diseases. Our systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the relationship between H. pylori infection in the gallbladder and chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis.Overall, our research showed that the prevalence ofHelicobacter species in the chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis group was significantly higher than that in the control group (24.40% vs. 8.55%, P=0.000), suggesting a potential positive correlation between Helicobacter species infection in the gallbladder and increased risk of chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis. Likewise, a higher gallbladder H. pylori infection rate was found in the chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis group than that in the control group (23.70% vs. 7.23%, P=0.000). Due to the small size of relevant studies, there was no significantly positive correlation between other Helicobacter species infection in the gallbladder with gallstone diseases except for H. hepaticus.People in countries with lower socioeconomic status are more likely to be infected withH. pylori. Previous studies [38] reported that the prevalence of H. pylori in Asia, Africa, and South America is higher than that in North America, Western Europe, and Australia, which may influence H. pylori infection rate in the gallbladder. So we divided the subgroups according to whether they were Asian countries or not. This positive association still persisted both in Asian or non-Asian countries. Also, the OR of Asian countries is quite higher than that of non-Asian countries (4.30 and 2.13, respectively). Different samples and different specific primers of PCR in each study included may also affect the results, so we performed subgroup based on the sample and specific primer. The H. pylori infection rate in bile was higher in chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis than that in controls (OR = 3.78, P=0.002), indicating that H. pylori is relatively more colonized in bile in gallstone diseases. Unfortunately, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of H. pylori infection in the gallbladder. The OR of 16S rRNA was lower than that of urease gene (2.27 and 10.18, respectively). Maybe false-positive result caused by urease A or C gene cross-reacting with the urease gene of other organisms accounted for it [40].In addition to ethnicity and genetics, advancing age and female gender as well as obesity are also risk factors for gallstones [5]. The risk of gallstone diseases increases with age in all racial groups. Because of female sex hormones and increased cholesterol secretion, females with obesity are more likely to get gallstones [41]. However, Bohr et al. [25] found that the most significant risk factors for gallstone disease were patients with age >65 years and being overweight. Female gender was not statistically significant. Moreover, the infection rate of H. pylori was also associated with age [38]. Bulajic et al. [16] noted that the possibility of detecting H. pylori in the bile increased steadily with increasing age. High H. pylori infection may affect the prevalence of gallstones diseases. H. pylori infection is less related to gender. In a marching cohort conducted by Miendje Deyi et al. [42], the proportion of H. pylori infected patients was virtually the same in males and females. However, due to limited studies and insufficient data of age, gender, and body mass index (BMI), we did not evaluate their impact on chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis. Further studies were suggested to clarify the role of age, gender, and BMI played in gallstones diseases.The pathways ofH. pylori into bile have not been completely explained, one possibility is the translocation from the duodenum via Oddi’s sphincter, and another is penetration via the portal circulation and lymphatic vessels [43, 44]. Bulajic et al. [16] and Bansal et al. [30] reported that there was a strong correlation between the presence of H. pylori in the bile and in the stomach, which may testify to the above views. In a study in Thailand [45], nevertheless, they suggested that gastroduodenal and hepatobiliary infections were caused by different H. pylori strains based on PCR analysis.The relationship betweenH. pylori infection and gallstones may have several potential mechanisms. Firstly, H. pylori can produce oxidative stress and free radical reactions through the reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) system [46, 47] and release large amounts of proinflammatory and vasoactive substances, such as interleukins (IL)-1, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α [48], which are involved in gallbladder inflammatory disorders and pathogenesis of gallstones. Secondly, H. pylori may also promote the risk of stone formation by acting as a foreign body nidus [49].Thirdly, urease-positive Helicobacter species are capable of precipitating calcium and participating in initiating gallstone formation [50]. Fourthly, H. pylori induces beta-glucuronidase, bacterial hydrolase, and phospholipase to deconjugate bile and hydrolyze phosphatidylcholine, thus facilitating the synthesis of free bilirubin, free bile acids, and free fatty acids. Free ionized calcium ion precipitates with free bilirubin to form calcium bilirubinate. Calcium bilirubinate, free bile acids, and free fatty acids are the major components of brown pigment stones [13].SinceH. pylori infection promotes the formation of gallstones, we consider whether H. pylori eradication therapy can prevent the formation of gallstones. In the studies of Zhang et al. [51] and Takahashi et al. [52], they both found a statistically significant trend in the reduction of gallstones among the patients who received H. pylori eradication. However, the drawback is that they used the fasting 13C urea breath test and serum anti-Hp antibody test as detection methods for H. pylori. Although the two methods are highly specific and sensitive, they cannot locate H. pylori infection in the gallbladder, which may undermine the reliability of the study. Besides, the serological test is not a reliable test for evaluating eradication therapy because antibodies can be present in the blood for a long time even after successful eradication [53]. Also, the presence of gallstones in the gallbladder was diagnosed by abdominal ultrasonography, which may lead to a false-negative result. In a word, the exact effect of eradicating H. pylori infection to prevent gallstone formation remains to be elucidated.It is noteworthy that our meta-analysis also has some strengths. Firstly, in order to avoid the influence of different test methods on the research, we selected studies using PCR as theH. pylori infection detection method, which is a highly sensitive and specific method. Serological testing is excluded for the relatively high negative predictive value [54–56]. Besides, there was no gallbladder disease in the control group. Due to the high correlation between H. pylori infection and gallbladder cancer, these patients are excluded [57, 58]. There was a previous meta-analysis which assessed the association between H. pylori infection and chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis [59]. However, the included studies mixed H. pylori and other Helicobacter species. In our study, we analyzed H. pylori and other Helicobacter species separately and conducted more in-depth subgroup analyses of H. pylori based on the extracted sample and specific primer.However, several limitations of this meta-analysis should be noted. Most patients with cholelithiasis have been treated with antibiotics. Different doses and courses of antibiotics might inhibit the growth of the bacterium and influence the results. Besides, since the retrograde contamination is caused by ERCP, there may be false-positive results. Furthermore, there are diverse bacterial communities in human bile samples such asPseudomonas aeruginosa, E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterococcus spp., and Acinetobacter spp. Tajeddin et al. [60] pointed that Escherichia coli was significantly related to gallstone formation. Our study cannot avoid interference from other bacteria. Previous studies have suggested that H. pylori infection may be associated with pancreatic cancer [61], liver cirrhosis, and liver cancer [62]. It is a pity that the control group could not completely exclude such patients in our study.In conclusion, our meta-analysis showed a significant positive correlation betweenH. pylori infection in the gallbladder and increased risk of cholelithiasis and chronic cholecystitis, especially in Asian countries. The association was more pronounced using the bile sample and urease gene primer. Also, more studies are needed to determine whether age, gender, and BMI interfere with the relationship between gallbladder H. pylori infection and chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis. It is hoped that more randomized trials in the future can better clarify the relationship between them and provide clinical evidence for the prevention and treatment of chronic cholecystitis/cholelithiasis.



---

*Source: 8886085-2021-01-06.xml*