# Nucleus Pulposus Cell Conditioned Medium Promotes Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation into Nucleus Pulposus-Like Cells under Hypoxic Conditions

Authors: Arjun Sinkemani; Feng Wang; Zhiyang Xie; Lu Chen; Cong Zhang; Xiaotao Wu
Journal: Stem Cells International
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is a major physical and socioeconomic challenge worldwide. Nucleus pulposus (NP) is directly associated with LBP due to intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration. IVD degeneration is mainly caused by structural and matrix-related changes within the IVD occurring during aging and degeneration. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can differentiate into multiple mesenchymal lineages under specific stimulatory conditions. This study is aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of the nucleus pulposus cell (NPC) conditioned medium for promoting the expression of MSCs and at confirming the expression of healthy NP phenotypic markers recently recommended by the Spine Research Interest Group. Expression was investigated using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and western blotting under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. qPCR and western blotting demonstrated significant upregulation of NP marker expression in MSCs cultured under hypoxic conditions and treated with the 50% or 100% NPC conditioned medium, compared with those cultured under normoxic conditions. Upregulation was highest in the presence of the 100% NPC conditioned medium compared with the control group (aggrecan,p<0.01; brachyury, p<0.05; collagen II, p<0.001; KRT8, p<0.01; KRT19, p<0.001; and Shh, p<0.01). The expression levels of genes in MSCs treated with the 50% NPC conditioned medium also showed upregulation compared with the control group (collagen II, p<0.05; KRT8, p<0.05; and KRT19, p<0.01). These findings suggested that the NPC conditioned medium stimulated MSC differentiation into an NP-like phenotype with distinct characteristics. The results could inform strategies for IVD regeneration.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Low back pain (LBP) is a major cause of disability worldwide [1], which affects more than 84% of people at least once during their lifetime [2]. Although it is presumably multifactorial, the underlying etiology of LBP is unknown. Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is the main clinical presentation. The primary cause of disc degeneration is tissue breakdown, primarily due to senescence, poor diet, genetic inheritance, or injury [3]. IVD degeneration is a process and is often caused by biomechanical changes within the IVD. The causes of IVD degeneration have not been fully elucidated but are presumed to include environmental and genetic factors [4]. During disc degeneration, various homeostatic alterations occur in resident cells, which result in degradative tissue anabolism and elevated tissue catabolism [5]. Disc degeneration can be caused by disc tissue dehydration, proteoglycan loss, fibrotic tissue formation, and disc height reduction [3, 6]. The gelatinous extracellular matrix breaks down, leading to fibrotic tissue formation that strains nucleus pulposus cells (NPCs) [7, 8].Current treatment strategies provide symptomatic pain relief rather than the resolution of the underlying etiology of IVD degeneration. Spinal fusion and discectomy are the most widely used surgical treatments for LBP. In these surgical procedures, degenerated or herniated disc is removed, and nearby discs are fused with metal rods and bone cement; the latter is used in vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty [9, 10]. Although the procedures are designed to relieve pain, patients eventually experience persistent pain and reduced spinal mobility [11]. These procedures may accelerate degeneration in some IVD segments due to biomechanical changes [12, 13]. Because of the poor long-term efficacy of current treatments and increasing prevalence of IVD degeneration, there is a need to address the underlying pathogenesis of IVD degeneration and restore normal IVD function, rather than simply achieve pain reduction. Accordingly, biological and cell-based therapies are necessary as alternative treatments for IVD degeneration.Cell-based therapies include the implantation of autologous NPCs or stem cells in the degenerated discs, with the aim of restoring IVD metabolic homeostasis and reducing inflammation by replacing NPCs in the early stage of IVD degeneration. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are an important option for cell-based therapy. MSCs are the most frequently studied and widely used cells for regeneration purposes [14]. Studies have shown that MSCs can be differentiated into NP-like cells and may provide a good cell source for IVD regeneration. Furthermore, some publications have demonstrated that MSCs cocultured with the NPC conditioned medium can differentiate into NP-like cells and acquire a phenotype similar to that of NPCs [15]. Moreover, MSCs cultured in the notochordal cell conditioned medium synthesize high levels of proteoglycans within the IVD, presumably through stimulation of NPCs by metabolites, growth factors, and extracellular matrix proteins [16–18]. Therefore, MSCs have a high capacity for IVD regeneration [19].The Spine Research Interest Group of the Orthopedic Research Society stated that stable expression of HIF-1α, Glut-1, aggrecan/collagen II (ratio>20), Shh, brachyury, KRT18/19, CA12, and CD24 is necessary for spinal health [20]. However, there is a need for further investigation at the gene and protein levels to better understand MSC differentiation into NP-like cells. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effects of the NPC conditioned medium on the expression of MSCs cultured under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Both the mRNA and protein levels were assessed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and western blotting assays, to explore changes in gene and protein expression that might promote MSC differentiation into NP-like cells, and thus aid treatment of IVD degeneration.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Isolation and Culture of NPCs

The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Southeast University (Nanjing, China) approved all animal experiments performed in this study. Twenty male Sprague–Dawley rats (8 weeks old, 200–300 g) were euthanized with CO2. The NP tissues were isolated as described in our previous study [21]. NPCs were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM)/F-12 containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution under 5% CO2 and 21% O2 at 37°C. Cells were harvested using 0.25% trypsin-EDTA (1 mM) solution (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and subcultured (1 : 2); cells were collected at passages 1–3. The culture medium was changed at 3-day intervals. The NPC conditioned medium (passage 3) was used in the experiments.


### 2.2. MSC Culture in the 50% or 100% NPC Conditioned Medium

Sprague–Dawley rat bone marrow-derived MSCs were purchased from Cyagen Biosciences (Suzhou, China). The MSCs were cultured in DMEM/F-12 containing 10% FBS (Gibco) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution. All cells were cultured under 5% CO2 and 21% O2 at 37°C. The culture medium was changed at 3-day intervals. Cells from passage 5 were used in our studies. MSCs were cultured for 7 days with the 50% or 100% NPC conditioned medium in the experimental groups, while the control group MSCs were cultured in DMEM/F-12 containing 10% FBS (Gibco) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution. The culture medium for the control group and conditioned medium for the experimental groups were changed twice per week.


### 2.3. Cell Culture under Hypoxic Conditions

NPCs were cultured in a hypoxic environment (3131 Incubator; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) under conditions of 93% N2, 5% CO2, and 2% O2 at 37°C [22]. The NPCs were cultured in fresh DMEM/F-12, supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution, and then subjected to hypoxic conditions for 3 days. As noted above, the NPC conditioned medium (passage 3) was used in the experiments. MSCs were also cultured in a hypoxic environment (3131 Incubator; Thermo Fisher Scientific) under conditions of 93% N2, 5% CO2, and 2% O2 at 37°C [22]. MSCs were cultured for 7 days with the 50% or 100% NPC conditioned medium in the experimental groups, while the control group MSCs were cultured in DMEM/F-12 containing 10% FBS (Gibco) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution. The culture medium for the control group and conditioned medium for the experimental groups were changed twice per week.


### 2.4. Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction

Total mRNA was extracted from NPCs and MSCs, both of which had been cultured under normoxic and hypoxic conditions in 6 cm plates, at days 3 and 7, respectively. mRNA extraction was performed using a Universal RNA Extraction Kit (9767; Takara, Dalian, China). Reverse transcription was performed using the PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (RR047; Takara) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The qPCR analysis was carried out using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany) in the StepOnePlus PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The qPCR assay mixture contained 0.5μL of reverse primer (10 μM), 2 μL of cDNA template, 0.5 μL of forward primer (10 μM), 10 μL of SYBR Green solution, and 7 μL of dH2O. The gene-specific primer sequences are listed in Table 1. The target gene expression levels were normalized to β-actin using the 2-ΔΔCt cycle threshold method.Table 1
Primer sequences for gene expression analysis used in qPCR.
GenesForward (5′-3′)Reverse (5′-3′)HIF-1αGCAACTGCCACCACTGATGAGCTGTCCGACTGTGAGTACCHIF-2αGCACCAGCAGTTCACACTTGCTGACGGTCTTGTCAGGCATGlut-1GCTGTGGCTGGCTTCTCTAACCGGAAGCGATCTCATCGAAShhTATGAGGGTCGAGCAGTGGAAGTGGATGCGAGCTTTGGATBrachyuryTCTAGGCACAACATGGCAGGAAATTGGACCACAGCCTCGTAggrecanTGGCCTGCCTGACTTTAGTGCCTGAACCACTGACGCTGATCollagen IIGGCCAGGATGCCCGAAAATTAACCCCTCTCTCCCTTGTCACCarbonic anhydrase 3TGGTTCACTGGAACCCGAAGGAGCCTCCTTGCCCTTAGTCCarbonic anhydrase 12TCCGACAAGGACTGCTTACCGGAGATCCCAAGGACACCAGCD24AGTAATTGACACGGGCCAGGTGGGAAATGCTTTGCCGTTGCytokeratin 8CCCGGCTTCAGCTATGGAATAGCCTTGGTGCGGCTATAAGCytokeratin 18GACCCAGGAATACGAAGCCCACTTTGCCATCCACGACCTTCytokeratin 19GAGATCGCCACCTACCGAAGGGAAGGGCTGGTGTGAACTTqPCR: quantitative polymerase chain reaction.


### 2.5. Protein Extraction and Western Blotting

NPCs and MSCs cultured under normoxic and hypoxic conditions were placed on ice, harvested, and washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution at days 3 and 7, respectively. Total protein was extracted using the whole-cell lysis assay buffer (KeyGen, Nanjing, China). Protein concentrations were determined using the bicinchoninic acid assay (Beyotime, Jiangsu, China). Proteins were separated via 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (EMD Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). The membranes were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1.5 h and then incubated overnight with primary antibodies (Table2) at 4°C with gentle shaking. Subsequently, membranes were incubated with a secondary antibody (ab6721, 1 : 5000; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) which was diluted in 5% BSA for 1 h at room temperature. Immunolabeling was detected using the SuperSignal West FEMTO Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Relative protein expression levels were determined by quantitative densitometric analysis and normalized to the level of β-actin.Table 2
Antibodies used in WB and IF.
TargetAntibody (company, order number)WB usageIF usageHIF-1αAbcam, ab21851 : 10001 : 1000HIF-2αAbcam, ab1991 : 10001 : 1000Glut-1Abcam, ab153091 : 2501 : 250ShhAbcam, ab198971 : 2501 : 50BrachyuryBioss, bs-10669R1 : 2501 : 250AggrecanBioss, bs-11655R1 : 2501 : 250Collagen IIAbcam, ab1162421 : 10001 : 1000Carbonic anhydrase 3Abcam, ab1968351 : 10001 : 100Carbonic anhydrase 12(D78E4) CST, 58651 : 1000Carbonic anhydrase 12Bioss, bs-6025R1 : 250CD24Proteintech, 10600-1-AP1 : 1000CD24Bioss, bs-4891R1 : 250Cytokeratin 8Abcam, ab594001 : 10001 : 500Cytokeratin 18Abcam, ab1815971 : 10001 : 100Cytokeratin 19Abcam, ab846321 : 5001 : 500β-ActinAbcam, ab82271 : 2000WB: western blotting; IF: immunofluorescence.


### 2.6. Immunofluorescence Staining Microscopy

NPCs were plated in 12-well plates and maintained under hypoxic and normoxic conditions for 3 days. The cells were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min. NPCs on glass-bottom slides (Cellvis, Mountain View, CA, USA) were blocked in a buffer containing 5% BSA and 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 20 min. Then, NPCs were washed three times and incubated at 4°C overnight with primary antibodies (Table2). After the cells had been washed, they were incubated with a secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-rabbit, 1 : 1000; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. Cell nuclei were counterstained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 15 min at room temperature and observed using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).


### 2.7. Statistical Analysis

Results are expressed asmeans±standarddeviations from three independent experiments. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software (ver. 7.04; GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA), and differences among groups were analyzed using unpaired Student’s t-tests. Differences with p<0.05 were considered statistically significant.


## 2.1. Isolation and Culture of NPCs

The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Southeast University (Nanjing, China) approved all animal experiments performed in this study. Twenty male Sprague–Dawley rats (8 weeks old, 200–300 g) were euthanized with CO2. The NP tissues were isolated as described in our previous study [21]. NPCs were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM)/F-12 containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution under 5% CO2 and 21% O2 at 37°C. Cells were harvested using 0.25% trypsin-EDTA (1 mM) solution (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and subcultured (1 : 2); cells were collected at passages 1–3. The culture medium was changed at 3-day intervals. The NPC conditioned medium (passage 3) was used in the experiments.


## 2.2. MSC Culture in the 50% or 100% NPC Conditioned Medium

Sprague–Dawley rat bone marrow-derived MSCs were purchased from Cyagen Biosciences (Suzhou, China). The MSCs were cultured in DMEM/F-12 containing 10% FBS (Gibco) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution. All cells were cultured under 5% CO2 and 21% O2 at 37°C. The culture medium was changed at 3-day intervals. Cells from passage 5 were used in our studies. MSCs were cultured for 7 days with the 50% or 100% NPC conditioned medium in the experimental groups, while the control group MSCs were cultured in DMEM/F-12 containing 10% FBS (Gibco) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution. The culture medium for the control group and conditioned medium for the experimental groups were changed twice per week.


## 2.3. Cell Culture under Hypoxic Conditions

NPCs were cultured in a hypoxic environment (3131 Incubator; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) under conditions of 93% N2, 5% CO2, and 2% O2 at 37°C [22]. The NPCs were cultured in fresh DMEM/F-12, supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution, and then subjected to hypoxic conditions for 3 days. As noted above, the NPC conditioned medium (passage 3) was used in the experiments. MSCs were also cultured in a hypoxic environment (3131 Incubator; Thermo Fisher Scientific) under conditions of 93% N2, 5% CO2, and 2% O2 at 37°C [22]. MSCs were cultured for 7 days with the 50% or 100% NPC conditioned medium in the experimental groups, while the control group MSCs were cultured in DMEM/F-12 containing 10% FBS (Gibco) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution. The culture medium for the control group and conditioned medium for the experimental groups were changed twice per week.


## 2.4. Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction

Total mRNA was extracted from NPCs and MSCs, both of which had been cultured under normoxic and hypoxic conditions in 6 cm plates, at days 3 and 7, respectively. mRNA extraction was performed using a Universal RNA Extraction Kit (9767; Takara, Dalian, China). Reverse transcription was performed using the PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (RR047; Takara) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The qPCR analysis was carried out using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany) in the StepOnePlus PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The qPCR assay mixture contained 0.5μL of reverse primer (10 μM), 2 μL of cDNA template, 0.5 μL of forward primer (10 μM), 10 μL of SYBR Green solution, and 7 μL of dH2O. The gene-specific primer sequences are listed in Table 1. The target gene expression levels were normalized to β-actin using the 2-ΔΔCt cycle threshold method.Table 1
Primer sequences for gene expression analysis used in qPCR.
GenesForward (5′-3′)Reverse (5′-3′)HIF-1αGCAACTGCCACCACTGATGAGCTGTCCGACTGTGAGTACCHIF-2αGCACCAGCAGTTCACACTTGCTGACGGTCTTGTCAGGCATGlut-1GCTGTGGCTGGCTTCTCTAACCGGAAGCGATCTCATCGAAShhTATGAGGGTCGAGCAGTGGAAGTGGATGCGAGCTTTGGATBrachyuryTCTAGGCACAACATGGCAGGAAATTGGACCACAGCCTCGTAggrecanTGGCCTGCCTGACTTTAGTGCCTGAACCACTGACGCTGATCollagen IIGGCCAGGATGCCCGAAAATTAACCCCTCTCTCCCTTGTCACCarbonic anhydrase 3TGGTTCACTGGAACCCGAAGGAGCCTCCTTGCCCTTAGTCCarbonic anhydrase 12TCCGACAAGGACTGCTTACCGGAGATCCCAAGGACACCAGCD24AGTAATTGACACGGGCCAGGTGGGAAATGCTTTGCCGTTGCytokeratin 8CCCGGCTTCAGCTATGGAATAGCCTTGGTGCGGCTATAAGCytokeratin 18GACCCAGGAATACGAAGCCCACTTTGCCATCCACGACCTTCytokeratin 19GAGATCGCCACCTACCGAAGGGAAGGGCTGGTGTGAACTTqPCR: quantitative polymerase chain reaction.


## 2.5. Protein Extraction and Western Blotting

NPCs and MSCs cultured under normoxic and hypoxic conditions were placed on ice, harvested, and washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution at days 3 and 7, respectively. Total protein was extracted using the whole-cell lysis assay buffer (KeyGen, Nanjing, China). Protein concentrations were determined using the bicinchoninic acid assay (Beyotime, Jiangsu, China). Proteins were separated via 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (EMD Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). The membranes were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1.5 h and then incubated overnight with primary antibodies (Table2) at 4°C with gentle shaking. Subsequently, membranes were incubated with a secondary antibody (ab6721, 1 : 5000; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) which was diluted in 5% BSA for 1 h at room temperature. Immunolabeling was detected using the SuperSignal West FEMTO Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Relative protein expression levels were determined by quantitative densitometric analysis and normalized to the level of β-actin.Table 2
Antibodies used in WB and IF.
TargetAntibody (company, order number)WB usageIF usageHIF-1αAbcam, ab21851 : 10001 : 1000HIF-2αAbcam, ab1991 : 10001 : 1000Glut-1Abcam, ab153091 : 2501 : 250ShhAbcam, ab198971 : 2501 : 50BrachyuryBioss, bs-10669R1 : 2501 : 250AggrecanBioss, bs-11655R1 : 2501 : 250Collagen IIAbcam, ab1162421 : 10001 : 1000Carbonic anhydrase 3Abcam, ab1968351 : 10001 : 100Carbonic anhydrase 12(D78E4) CST, 58651 : 1000Carbonic anhydrase 12Bioss, bs-6025R1 : 250CD24Proteintech, 10600-1-AP1 : 1000CD24Bioss, bs-4891R1 : 250Cytokeratin 8Abcam, ab594001 : 10001 : 500Cytokeratin 18Abcam, ab1815971 : 10001 : 100Cytokeratin 19Abcam, ab846321 : 5001 : 500β-ActinAbcam, ab82271 : 2000WB: western blotting; IF: immunofluorescence.


## 2.6. Immunofluorescence Staining Microscopy

NPCs were plated in 12-well plates and maintained under hypoxic and normoxic conditions for 3 days. The cells were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min. NPCs on glass-bottom slides (Cellvis, Mountain View, CA, USA) were blocked in a buffer containing 5% BSA and 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 20 min. Then, NPCs were washed three times and incubated at 4°C overnight with primary antibodies (Table2). After the cells had been washed, they were incubated with a secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-rabbit, 1 : 1000; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. Cell nuclei were counterstained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 15 min at room temperature and observed using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).


## 2.7. Statistical Analysis

Results are expressed asmeans±standarddeviations from three independent experiments. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software (ver. 7.04; GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA), and differences among groups were analyzed using unpaired Student’s t-tests. Differences with p<0.05 were considered statistically significant.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Gene Expression in NPCs Cultured under Normoxic and Hypoxic Conditions

qPCR analysis was performed to characterize gene expression in Sprague–Dawley rat NPCs cultured under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. The results showed that the recommended young healthy NPC phenotype markers were expressed in both the normoxic and hypoxic conditions. The gene expression of NPCs was generally significantly higher in hypoxic conditions than in normoxic conditions, although HIF-2α exhibited higher expression in normoxic conditions (p<0.0001). The expression level of the CA3 gene was lower than that of KRT19, Shh, aggrecan, brachyury, collagen II, and HIF-1α in hypoxic conditions (p<0.01) (Figure 1). In contrast, CA12, CD24, Glut-1, KRT8, and KRT18 showed significantly higher expression in hypoxic conditions (p<0.0001) (Figure 1).Figure 1
Markers recommended for defining the young healthy NP phenotype. Relative gene expression by qPCR in NPCs cultured under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Gene expression levels for each sample were normalized against the housekeeping geneβ-actin. (a) Aggrecan, (b) brachyury, (c) carbonic anhydrase 3, (d) carbonic anhydrase 12, (e) CD24, (f) collagen II, (g) Glut-1, (h) HIF-1α, (i) HIF-2α, (j) KRT8, (k) KRT18, (l) KRT19, and (m) Shh. ∗p<0.05, ∗∗p<0.01, ∗∗∗p<0.001, and ∗∗∗∗p<0.0001.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)(k)(l)(m)


### 3.2. Protein Expression in NPCs Cultured under Normoxic and Hypoxic Conditions

Western blotting analysis was performed to investigate whether the proteins were also expressed in Sprague–Dawley rat NPCs in both the normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Notably, the recommended young healthy NPC phenotype markers were also expressed in both the normoxic and hypoxic conditions. The results of western blotting analysis were consistent with the results of qPCR, in that expression levels were higher in hypoxic conditions than normoxic conditions. The expression levels of KRT18, KRT19, and Shh were lower in hypoxic conditions (p<0.05), whereas collagen II, CD24, HIF-2α, Glut-1, brachyury, HIF-1α, CA3, KRT8, aggrecan, and CA12 were not (Figure 2). Furthermore, CA12 and aggrecan expression levels showed significant upregulation (p<0.0001) in hypoxic conditions (Figure 2).Figure 2
(a) Relative protein expression by western blotting in NPCs cultured under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Protein expression levels for each sample were normalized against the housekeeping geneβ-actin. (b) Collagen II, (c) Glut-1, (d) CD24, (e) carbonic anhydrase 12, (f) brachyury, (g) aggrecan, (h) HIF-1α, (i) HIF-2α, (j) carbonic anhydrase 3, (k) KRT8, (l) KRT18, (m) KRT19, and (n) Shh. ∗p<0.05, ∗∗p<0.01, ∗∗∗p<0.001, and ∗∗∗∗p<0.0001.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)(k)(l)(m)(n)


### 3.3. Immunofluorescence Staining Showing Protein Expression Patterns in NPCs

Immunofluorescence analysis was performed to identify protein expression in NPCs. All recommended young healthy NP phenotype markers were expressed in NPCs cultured under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Immunofluorescence staining showed significantly increased expression levels in hypoxic conditions. Aggrecan, brachyury, carbonic anhydrase 3, CD24, collagen II, Glut-1, HIF-1α, HIF-2α, KRT8, KRT18, KRT19, and Shh showed extensive staining under hypoxic conditions (Figure 3).Figure 3
Relative protein expression in NPCs cultured under normoxic and hypoxic conditions, measured by immunofluorescence. (a) Aggrecan, (b) brachyury, (c) carbonic anhydrase 3, (d) CD24, (e) collagen II, (f) Glut-1, (g) HIF-1α, (h) HIF-2α, (i) KRT8, (j) KRT18, (k) KRT19, and (l) Shh.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)(k)(l)


### 3.4. Gene Expression in MSCs Cultured under Normoxic and Hypoxic Conditions

qPCR analysis was performed to characterize gene expression in Sprague–Dawley rat bone marrow-derived MSCs cultured under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. The gene expression of MSCs was upregulated in hypoxic conditions with the 50% or 100% NPC conditioned medium, compared with normoxic conditions. The upregulation was greatest with the 100% NPC conditioned medium compared with the control group (aggrecan,p<0.01; brachyury, p<0.05; collagen II, p<0.001; KRT8, p<0.01; KRT19, p<0.001; and Shh, p<0.01). The expression levels in the 50% NPC conditioned medium condition were also upregulated compared with the control group (collagen II, p<0.05; KRT8, p<0.05; and KRT19, p<0.01). However, the expression level of KRT18 was opposite to that of the other respective genes, in that it was lower under both the normoxic and hypoxic conditions with the 50% or 100% NPC conditioned medium compared with the control group (Figure 4).Figure 4
qPCR assessment of relative gene expression in MSCs under normoxic and hypoxic conditions with the 50% or 100% NPC conditioned medium. Gene expression levels for each sample were normalized against the housekeeping geneβ-actin. (a) Aggrecan: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia; (b) brachyury: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia; (c) collagen II: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia; (d) KRT8: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia; (e) KRT18: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia; (f) KRT19: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia; and (g) Shh: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia. ∗p<0.05, ∗∗p<0.01, ∗∗∗p<0.001, and ∗∗∗∗p<0.0001.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)


### 3.5. Protein Expression in MSCs Cultured under Normoxic and Hypoxic Conditions

Western blotting analysis was performed to investigate whether the proteins were also expressed in rat bone marrow-derived MSCs in both the normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Importantly, the expression levels were upregulated upon treatment with the 50% or 100% NPC conditioned medium. The results of western blotting analysis were consistent with those of qPCR, in that expression levels were higher in hypoxic conditions than normoxic conditions. The upregulation was greatest with the 100% NPC conditioned medium compared with the control group (aggrecan,p<0.0001; brachyury, p<0.001; collagen II, p<0.0001; KRT8, p<0.0001; KRT19, p<0.0001; and Shh, p<0.01). The expression levels in the 50% NPC conditioned medium condition were also upregulated compared with the control group (aggrecan, p<0.01; collagen II, p<0.001; KRT19, p<0.0001; and Shh, p<0.05). Moreover, the expression level of KRT18 was consistent with the results of qPCR analysis, in that it was lower under both the normoxic and hypoxic conditions with the 50% or 100% NPC conditioned medium compared with the control group (Figure 5).Figure 5
(a–c) Western blotting assessment of relative protein expression in MSCs under normoxic and hypoxic conditions with the 50% or 100% NPC conditioned medium. Protein expression levels for each sample were normalized against the housekeeping geneβ-actin. (d) Aggrecan: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia; (e) brachyury: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia; (f) collagen II: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia; (g) KRT8: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia; (h) KRT18: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia; (i) KRT19: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia; and (j) Shh: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia. ∗p<0.05, ∗∗p<0.01, ∗∗∗p<0.001, and ∗∗∗∗p<0.0001.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)


## 3.1. Gene Expression in NPCs Cultured under Normoxic and Hypoxic Conditions

qPCR analysis was performed to characterize gene expression in Sprague–Dawley rat NPCs cultured under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. The results showed that the recommended young healthy NPC phenotype markers were expressed in both the normoxic and hypoxic conditions. The gene expression of NPCs was generally significantly higher in hypoxic conditions than in normoxic conditions, although HIF-2α exhibited higher expression in normoxic conditions (p<0.0001). The expression level of the CA3 gene was lower than that of KRT19, Shh, aggrecan, brachyury, collagen II, and HIF-1α in hypoxic conditions (p<0.01) (Figure 1). In contrast, CA12, CD24, Glut-1, KRT8, and KRT18 showed significantly higher expression in hypoxic conditions (p<0.0001) (Figure 1).Figure 1
Markers recommended for defining the young healthy NP phenotype. Relative gene expression by qPCR in NPCs cultured under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Gene expression levels for each sample were normalized against the housekeeping geneβ-actin. (a) Aggrecan, (b) brachyury, (c) carbonic anhydrase 3, (d) carbonic anhydrase 12, (e) CD24, (f) collagen II, (g) Glut-1, (h) HIF-1α, (i) HIF-2α, (j) KRT8, (k) KRT18, (l) KRT19, and (m) Shh. ∗p<0.05, ∗∗p<0.01, ∗∗∗p<0.001, and ∗∗∗∗p<0.0001.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)(k)(l)(m)


## 3.2. Protein Expression in NPCs Cultured under Normoxic and Hypoxic Conditions

Western blotting analysis was performed to investigate whether the proteins were also expressed in Sprague–Dawley rat NPCs in both the normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Notably, the recommended young healthy NPC phenotype markers were also expressed in both the normoxic and hypoxic conditions. The results of western blotting analysis were consistent with the results of qPCR, in that expression levels were higher in hypoxic conditions than normoxic conditions. The expression levels of KRT18, KRT19, and Shh were lower in hypoxic conditions (p<0.05), whereas collagen II, CD24, HIF-2α, Glut-1, brachyury, HIF-1α, CA3, KRT8, aggrecan, and CA12 were not (Figure 2). Furthermore, CA12 and aggrecan expression levels showed significant upregulation (p<0.0001) in hypoxic conditions (Figure 2).Figure 2
(a) Relative protein expression by western blotting in NPCs cultured under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Protein expression levels for each sample were normalized against the housekeeping geneβ-actin. (b) Collagen II, (c) Glut-1, (d) CD24, (e) carbonic anhydrase 12, (f) brachyury, (g) aggrecan, (h) HIF-1α, (i) HIF-2α, (j) carbonic anhydrase 3, (k) KRT8, (l) KRT18, (m) KRT19, and (n) Shh. ∗p<0.05, ∗∗p<0.01, ∗∗∗p<0.001, and ∗∗∗∗p<0.0001.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)(k)(l)(m)(n)


## 3.3. Immunofluorescence Staining Showing Protein Expression Patterns in NPCs

Immunofluorescence analysis was performed to identify protein expression in NPCs. All recommended young healthy NP phenotype markers were expressed in NPCs cultured under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Immunofluorescence staining showed significantly increased expression levels in hypoxic conditions. Aggrecan, brachyury, carbonic anhydrase 3, CD24, collagen II, Glut-1, HIF-1α, HIF-2α, KRT8, KRT18, KRT19, and Shh showed extensive staining under hypoxic conditions (Figure 3).Figure 3
Relative protein expression in NPCs cultured under normoxic and hypoxic conditions, measured by immunofluorescence. (a) Aggrecan, (b) brachyury, (c) carbonic anhydrase 3, (d) CD24, (e) collagen II, (f) Glut-1, (g) HIF-1α, (h) HIF-2α, (i) KRT8, (j) KRT18, (k) KRT19, and (l) Shh.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)(k)(l)


## 3.4. Gene Expression in MSCs Cultured under Normoxic and Hypoxic Conditions

qPCR analysis was performed to characterize gene expression in Sprague–Dawley rat bone marrow-derived MSCs cultured under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. The gene expression of MSCs was upregulated in hypoxic conditions with the 50% or 100% NPC conditioned medium, compared with normoxic conditions. The upregulation was greatest with the 100% NPC conditioned medium compared with the control group (aggrecan,p<0.01; brachyury, p<0.05; collagen II, p<0.001; KRT8, p<0.01; KRT19, p<0.001; and Shh, p<0.01). The expression levels in the 50% NPC conditioned medium condition were also upregulated compared with the control group (collagen II, p<0.05; KRT8, p<0.05; and KRT19, p<0.01). However, the expression level of KRT18 was opposite to that of the other respective genes, in that it was lower under both the normoxic and hypoxic conditions with the 50% or 100% NPC conditioned medium compared with the control group (Figure 4).Figure 4
qPCR assessment of relative gene expression in MSCs under normoxic and hypoxic conditions with the 50% or 100% NPC conditioned medium. Gene expression levels for each sample were normalized against the housekeeping geneβ-actin. (a) Aggrecan: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia; (b) brachyury: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia; (c) collagen II: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia; (d) KRT8: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia; (e) KRT18: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia; (f) KRT19: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia; and (g) Shh: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia. ∗p<0.05, ∗∗p<0.01, ∗∗∗p<0.001, and ∗∗∗∗p<0.0001.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)


## 3.5. Protein Expression in MSCs Cultured under Normoxic and Hypoxic Conditions

Western blotting analysis was performed to investigate whether the proteins were also expressed in rat bone marrow-derived MSCs in both the normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Importantly, the expression levels were upregulated upon treatment with the 50% or 100% NPC conditioned medium. The results of western blotting analysis were consistent with those of qPCR, in that expression levels were higher in hypoxic conditions than normoxic conditions. The upregulation was greatest with the 100% NPC conditioned medium compared with the control group (aggrecan,p<0.0001; brachyury, p<0.001; collagen II, p<0.0001; KRT8, p<0.0001; KRT19, p<0.0001; and Shh, p<0.01). The expression levels in the 50% NPC conditioned medium condition were also upregulated compared with the control group (aggrecan, p<0.01; collagen II, p<0.001; KRT19, p<0.0001; and Shh, p<0.05). Moreover, the expression level of KRT18 was consistent with the results of qPCR analysis, in that it was lower under both the normoxic and hypoxic conditions with the 50% or 100% NPC conditioned medium compared with the control group (Figure 5).Figure 5
(a–c) Western blotting assessment of relative protein expression in MSCs under normoxic and hypoxic conditions with the 50% or 100% NPC conditioned medium. Protein expression levels for each sample were normalized against the housekeeping geneβ-actin. (d) Aggrecan: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia; (e) brachyury: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia; (f) collagen II: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia; (g) KRT8: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia; (h) KRT18: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia; (i) KRT19: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia; and (j) Shh: (i) normoxia, (ii) hypoxia. ∗p<0.05, ∗∗p<0.01, ∗∗∗p<0.001, and ∗∗∗∗p<0.0001.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)


## 4. Discussion

Many studies have been performed on IVD, but the origins of NP and NPCs remain unclear. However, normal NP can be characterized by molecular profiling. There is evidence that mature NPCs differentiated through notochordal lineages and that all cells (e.g., chondrocyte-like cells) in adults are also differentiated from notochordal lineages with variable morphology and size during maturation. These studies also suggested that certain markers are more specific to NPCs [23–30]. NPs are located in hypoxic environments and are adapted for the IVD microenvironment.MSCs are a potential cell type for IVD regeneration. Among the available cell sources, bone marrow-derived MSCs are frequently used. Many studies have reported that MSCs exhibit a robust differentiation ability toward the NPC phenotype, which has proven useful in clinical trials. To obtain a better understanding of MSC differentiation into NP-like cells, we investigated the effects of the 50% or 100% NPC conditioned medium on MSCs. Some previous studies showed that the notochordal cells and notochordal cell conditioned medium had positive effects in the treatment of IVD degeneration [31, 32]. However, it remains unclear whether these positive effects apply to MSCs. Aggrecan and collagen II show enhanced expression associated with a healthy NPC phenotype, whereas MSCs showed stimulatory effects (e.g., upregulated deposition of proteoglycan in IVD) when exposed to the notochordal cell conditioned medium [33].Our study was conducted under both the normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Hypoxic conditions have shown an ability to support MSC differentiation toward an NPC phenotype [34]. We have cultured NPCs and MSCs under both the normoxic and hypoxic conditions. We used the 50% or 100% NPC conditioned medium (passage 3) for the treatment of MSCs. Treatment with the NPC conditioned medium had a more positive impact on MSC differentiation. Aggrecan and collagen II are distinctly expressed in the normal NP, and the loss of aggrecan synthesis has been observed in IVD degeneration [35]. There is also evidence that normoxic-independent stabilization of HIF-1α drives metabolic glycolysis, which can aid in regulating aggrecan gene expression in NPCs [36]. During IVD degeneration, increased cell senescence has been reported, along with reduced production of aggrecan and collagen II [37]. In our study, aggrecan and collagen II showed distinct upregulation under hypoxic conditions, following treatment with the 50% or 100% NPC conditioned medium. Collectively, our study showed that the NPC conditioned medium may promote regeneration through MSC differentiation toward healthy NPC phenotypes.The results of our study are consistent with those of some other studies concerning the regenerative effects of notochordal cells; specifically, the NPC conditioned medium was presumed to contain certain nutritional constituents and secretory growth factors [16, 38]. Our previous study demonstrated that MSCs play a vital role in preserving normal NP tissue stability by maintaining physiological processes [39]. However, that study also suggested that NPC senescence leads to IVD degeneration, where preventing this senescence can reduce IVD degeneration [40]. Notably, our study suggested that NPC senescence can be inhibited by MSC treatment with the 100% NPC conditioned medium under hypoxic conditions.To identify the recommended phenotype markers of young healthy NPCs, we also examined the expression of NPC markers under normoxic and hypoxic culture conditions. Our study showed significant upregulation of NP markers when NPCs were cultured in hypoxic conditions. FOX1, PAX1, and CA12 are highly expressed in NPCs [30], while HIF-1α in NPCs is metabolically adapted to conditions involving low oxygen and nutrition deficiency [36]. The NP is the largest avascular tissue in the IVD, which is physiologically adapted to survive in a hypoxic microenvironment through the expression of HIF-1α and HIF-2α. The expression of HIF-2α is regulated by the NF-κB pathway, where HIF-2α levels are reduced under hypoxic conditions [41, 42]. Our results suggested that MSC explantation can enhance differentiation toward NPC phenotypes for IVD regeneration. The reduction of the extracellular matrix is another important consideration. The balance between extracellular matrix anabolism and catabolism mediated by disc cells is influenced by proinflammatory cytokine instability during IVD degeneration [43, 44]. Therefore, inhibiting the pathological process involving these inflammatory cytokines might stimulate MSC differentiation, resulting in enhanced extracellular matrix deposition. Notably, our results showed upregulated expression of aggrecan and collagen II, which can promote matrix formation.Shh and brachyury are expressed in the developing notochord, where they are required for notochordal sheath formation and NP patterning [45–47]. Transcriptional factors expressed by the notochord, as well as the presence of NP patterning factors (Shh and brachyury), guide NPC differentiation and survival. The expression levels of Shh and brachyury are informative regarding NPC ontology [47]. Shh and brachyury levels are downregulated with aging and IVD degeneration [30]. Increased expression levels of brachyury, aggrecan, and chondroitin sulfate are caused by Wnt signaling activation in aged discs [48]. Some studies have reported that brachyury is also expressed in some mature NPs [49, 50]. In a study by Tang et al., brachyury was expressed in developing human NP tissue [51]. Therefore, expression of the NP markers Shh and brachyury suggested the presence of notochordal cell markers in our study, confirming the findings of previous studies [29, 30, 52]. In addition, MSCs treated with the 100% NPC conditioned medium showed considerably higher expression levels of the brachyury and Shh genes. These results were presumed to be indicative of MSC differentiation toward an NP-like phenotype.Cytokeratins (KRT8, KRT18, and KRT19) were previously identified as markers for rat NPCs. These genes are also expressed in normal epithelial cells and are presumed to be human notochord-specific markers, although KRT19 alone was confirmed in human NPCs. However, KRT19 exhibited reduced expression in aging discs [24, 53, 54]. A microarray study by Minogue et al. identified NP-specific expression patterns of several genes, including KRT8, KRT18, and KRT19, in bovine NPCs [49]. Cytokeratins have unique cytoskeletal functions that aid maintenance of stable cell structures, regulate Fas-mediated apoptosis, and modulate both cell size and protein synthesis [55]. They also play important roles in tissue development and differentiation. KRT8, KRT18, and KRT19 were identified in both the rat and human NPCs [24, 25, 56]. Rodrigues-Pinto et al. reported that KRT8, KRT18, and KRT19 were expressed in IVD notochordal cells in all developmental stages [57]. In a recent study, KRT8 and KRT18 were detected in NPCs regardless of age or degeneration, whereas KRT19 expression was enhanced in aged IVD [29]. Indeed, KRT8, KRT18, and KRT19 showed significantly higher expression in hypoxic conditions in NPCs. Those results were consistent with MSC expression, with the exception of KRT18. qPCR and western blotting analyses of KRT18 showed lower expression under both the normoxic and hypoxic conditions. The hypoxic environment of the IVD promotes ontogeny and maintenance of cell function.In this study, we evaluated recommended NP phenotypic markers and investigated the effects of the NPC conditioned medium on MSCs in both the normoxic and hypoxic environments. We concluded that these recommended phenotypic markers were expressed in both the normoxic and hypoxic culture conditions and that the NPC conditioned medium contains a secretory factor that influences gene and protein expression in MSCs. Thus, the secretory factor presumably promoted MSC differentiation into an NP-like phenotype.


## 5. Conclusion

Our study provided data that could aid the identification of the healthy NPC phenotype. We concluded that NPCs express functionally active HIF-1α, HIF-2α, Glut-1, aggrecan, collagen II, Shh, brachyury, KRT8, KRT18, KRT19, CA3, CA12, and CD24 under both the normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Furthermore, the NPC conditioned medium promoted MSC differentiation into NP-like cells. Finally, this study showed that NPCs and MSCs can adapt to hypoxic microenvironments, in which hypoxia stimulates these cells to maintain their specific characteristics. Our study provides a scientific basis for cell-based therapy in the treatment of IVD degeneration.



---

*Source: 8882549-2020-12-23.xml*