# Chemical Evaluation of Trace Elements in Bottled Water

Authors: Bikram Gautam
Journal: Journal of Healthcare Engineering
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

Sales of bottled water have been increasing around the globe. This study was carried out to assess the trace elements present in bottled water. For the study of bottled water, a total of 100 samples of different volumes (20 L and 1 L) were selected. The physicochemical assessments were performed as per the methods described in the American Public Health Association, 2005. Average values of pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, and turbidity were found to be 5.96 ± 0.54, 59.97 ± 58.65, 4.42 ± 3.69, and 0.408 ± 0.19, respectively. Likewise, average values of total hardness (as CaCO3), calcium (as CaCO3), magnesium (as CaCO3), chlorine, iron, copper, cobalt, nickel, fluoride, sodium, and potassium were found to be 14.78 ± 8.43, 3.26 ± 1.55, 11.51 ± 7.92, 7.51 ± 3.21, 0.0032 ± 0.0017, 0.0091 ± 0.0116, 0.2520 ± 0.0127, 0.0080 ± 0.0082, 0.047 ± 0.0139, 12.65 ± 10.90, and 1.41 ± 2.00, respectively; meanwhile residual chlorine, zinc, silver, cadmium, and lead were below detection limit. All the physicochemical characteristics of bottled water were found to be within International Bottled Water Association (IBWA) guidelines. From the physicochemical aspects, the bottled water was found to be within the permissible value set by IBWA. Pearson’s correlation revealed significant association between trace elements. Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the majority (iron, copper, cobalt, nickel, fluoride, sodium, and potassium) of trace elements and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (at 95% confidence interval). At elevated concentrations, some elements can be harmful to human health and can cause morphological abnormalities, mutagenic effects, reduced growth, and increased morbidity and mortality in humans but it all depends upon a person’s metabolic factors, genetic factors, and ability to excrete trace elements through different routes, etc. Water could have percolated down from the surface to the ground water and as such the difference in concentration of trace elements in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons could be noticeable.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Water is known as a universal solvent and even in its natural state it may contain substantial quantities of chemical elements [1, 2]. Anthropogenic contaminants (e.g., pesticides, fertilizers, and nutrients) and industrial chemicals (e.g., hydrocarbon derivatives and heavy metals) can also be found in the water [3–6]. Chemical contaminants in drinking water pose health risks for infants, the elderly, and people with weakened immune systems due to viral infections, immune disorders, cancer, chemotherapy, or recent organ transplantation [7–9]. A study conducted in California found 38 pollutants in 10 bottled water brands [10].Inorganic substances (heavy metals and macro inorganic elements such as nitrate/nitrite) in water have received most of the attention because of their potentially harmful effects [7, 11]. At elevated concentrations, some elements can be harmful to human health and can cause morphological abnormalities, mutagenic effects, reduced growth, and increased mortality in humans [12]. The presence of organics, radionuclides, nitrates, and nitrites in drinking water can lead to cancer, other human body malfunctions, and chronic illness [13]. Several trace elements (Ag, Be, Li, Ge, Sb, Sc, Te, Th, and U) are not monitored in bottled waters [1, 2]. As a result, there are extremely limited data on the abundance and potential health impact of many toxic trace elements [12, 14].The outcomes of this study are expected to increase the public’s understanding of water and the nutrients it contains. This study also hopes to enlighten the governmental bodies, water bottle industries, and license-providing authoritative bodies like International Bottled Water Association (IBWA) and Department of Food Technology and Quality Control (DFTQC) regarding the importance of excess trace elements in bottled water.The aim of this study is to assess some of the important physical and chemical properties of bottled water in comparison to the IBWA guidelines.


## 2. Methodology

### 2.1. Study Site

The study was performed in the Department of Microbiology, St. Xavier’s College, Maitighar; the Research Center for Applied Science and Technology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur; and the Department of Mines and Geology, Ministry of Industry, Lazimpat. The study was conducted from July 2017 through September 2017.


### 2.2. Sample Selection, Size, Collection, Transportation, and Storage

For the bottled water study, both 20 L and 1 L bottles were selected and processed in both monsoon and postmonsoon seasons. A total of 100 samples were selected for the study.Bottled water in 20 L containers was purchased in the market. After shaking the bottle, the seal was opened in the market/retailer and the neck was sterilized by 70% ethanol. Four sterilized polypropylene bottles were filled, leaving headspace, and were labeled.Four 1L bottles of water were purchased from the market. The collected samples were kept in mini cooler with ice packs and transported to the laboratory to be processed.


## 2.1. Study Site

The study was performed in the Department of Microbiology, St. Xavier’s College, Maitighar; the Research Center for Applied Science and Technology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur; and the Department of Mines and Geology, Ministry of Industry, Lazimpat. The study was conducted from July 2017 through September 2017.


## 2.2. Sample Selection, Size, Collection, Transportation, and Storage

For the bottled water study, both 20 L and 1 L bottles were selected and processed in both monsoon and postmonsoon seasons. A total of 100 samples were selected for the study.Bottled water in 20 L containers was purchased in the market. After shaking the bottle, the seal was opened in the market/retailer and the neck was sterilized by 70% ethanol. Four sterilized polypropylene bottles were filled, leaving headspace, and were labeled.Four 1L bottles of water were purchased from the market. The collected samples were kept in mini cooler with ice packs and transported to the laboratory to be processed.


## 3. Assessment of Physical Parameters

### 3.1. pH

pH meter (calibrated by using buffer solutions of pH 4.0, 7.0, and 9.0) was used to determine the pH of water samples [15].


### 3.2. Electric Conductivity

Conductivity meter (calibrated by using standard sodium chloride solution of 19880μS/cm) was used to determine the conductivity [15].


### 3.3. Total Dissolved Solid

100 ml of water was filtered through membrane filter and then it was subjected to heat in a porcelain basin of known weight at 110°C in hot air oven and the basin was transferred to white silica containing desiccator. The change in weight was determined [15].


### 3.4. Turbidity

Nephelometer (calibrated with Formazin standard solutions of 0.2 NTU, 10 NTU, 100 NTU, and 1000 NTU) was used to measure the turbidity of water samples by filling in the clean and chemical leached dry cuvette [15].


## 3.1. pH

pH meter (calibrated by using buffer solutions of pH 4.0, 7.0, and 9.0) was used to determine the pH of water samples [15].


## 3.2. Electric Conductivity

Conductivity meter (calibrated by using standard sodium chloride solution of 19880μS/cm) was used to determine the conductivity [15].


## 3.3. Total Dissolved Solid

100 ml of water was filtered through membrane filter and then it was subjected to heat in a porcelain basin of known weight at 110°C in hot air oven and the basin was transferred to white silica containing desiccator. The change in weight was determined [15].


## 3.4. Turbidity

Nephelometer (calibrated with Formazin standard solutions of 0.2 NTU, 10 NTU, 100 NTU, and 1000 NTU) was used to measure the turbidity of water samples by filling in the clean and chemical leached dry cuvette [15].


## 4. Assessment of Chemical Parameters

### 4.1. Total Hardness

Measured volume of 2 mL buffer solution of ammonium chloride and ammonium hydroxide was added to 50 mL of the water samples. A change in color was observed and the solution was titrated against EDTA in the presence of the indicator Eriochrome Black T [15]. The Total hardness was calculated as(1)total hardnessmg/L=V∗1000v,where V is ml of EDTA consumed and v is volume of sample.


### 4.2. Calcium

Measured volume of 1 ml sodium hydroxide solution was added to 50 mL of water sample and 0.2 g solution (ammonium purpurate and sodium chloride). A change in color was observed and the solution was titrated against EDTA in the presence of the indicator NaOH solution [15]. Calcium was calculated as(2)calcium hardnessmg/L=V∗400.8v,where V is ml of EDTA consumed and v is volume of sample.


### 4.3. Magnesium

The value of calcium (as CaCO3) was deducted from total hardness (as CaCO3) [15]. Magnesium was calculated asMagnesium (as CaCO3) (mg/L) = Total hardness (as CaCO3) - Calcium (as CaCO3).


### 4.4. Chloride

After adjusting the pH of water between 7 and 10 (with the addition of H2SO4 and NaOH), 50 mL of water was titrated against AgNO3 in the presence of indicator K2Cr2O4 and change in color was noticed [15]. The process was repeated for blank. Chloride was calculated as(3)chloridemg/L=A−B∗S∗35.5∗1000v,where A denotes AgNO3 consumed by sample, B denotes AgNO3 consumed by blank, S denotes strength of AgNO3, and v denotes volume of sample.


### 4.5. Residual Chlorine

In a clean and chemical leached conical flask, 5 mL acetic acid and 50 mL sample were mixed. 1 mL of potassium iodide was added in the solution which was titrated against 0.025 N Na2S2O3. After adding starch solution, titration was again done against 0.025 N Na2S2O3 [15]. As a quality control blank was run using the same methodology. Residual chlorine was calculated as(4)residual chlorinemg/L=V∗S∗35.46∗1000v,where S denotes strength of Na2S2O3, V denotes volume of Na2S2O3 consumed, and v denotes volume of sample.


### 4.6. Fluoride

First value was set to 0 at 570 nm with the help of reference solution. The absorbance was taken in a clean, chemical leached cuvette containing 5 mL water and 50μL NaAsO2 [15]. As a quality control blank was run using the same methodology.


### 4.7. Sodium and Potassium

After calibrating the flame photometer at 589 nm for sodium and 768 nm for potassium (NaCl solutions of standards 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mg/L; KCl solution of standards 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mg/L), respectively, 5 ml water sample was taken in a clean, chemical leached, and dry tube. In case of excess concentration of sodium in the sample, dilution was done with deionized water and dilution factor was applied to the obtained value in flame photometer [15].


### 4.8. Trace Elements

About 500 mL water filtered using membrane filter was stored in 4°C in a chemical leached bottle. The heavy metals were detected using Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (FAAS) AA-7000 manufactured by Shimadzu, Japan, with ASC-7000 autosampler [15]. The instrumental parameters set for the analysis of the elements analyzed is tabulated separately as follows (Table 1).Table 1
Instrumental parameters set for the analysis of the trace elements in AA-7000 (F-AAS).
ElementsWavelength (nm)Slit width (nm)Lamp current (mA)Flow rate of air acetylene flame (L/min)AcetyleneAirIron248.30.2122.215Zinc213.90.781.8Silver328.10.220.9Copper324.80.781.8Cadmium228.80.741.2Cobalt240.70.2121.6Nickel232.00.2121.6Lead283.30.551.5L: liter(s); nm: nanometer; mA: milliamperes; min: minute.The water samples were analyzed for each element mentioned in the above table under similar parameters described for corresponding elements and the concentration for each sample was determined by the software. 100 mL distilled water with 1-2 mL conc. HNO3 was taken as blank solution for the measurements.


### 4.9. Quality Control

Strict chemical leaching procedures were followed for quality control [4]. To obtain reliable physiochemical results, a sample was processed 3 times. Instruments and equipment were calibrated before use.


## 4.1. Total Hardness

Measured volume of 2 mL buffer solution of ammonium chloride and ammonium hydroxide was added to 50 mL of the water samples. A change in color was observed and the solution was titrated against EDTA in the presence of the indicator Eriochrome Black T [15]. The Total hardness was calculated as(1)total hardnessmg/L=V∗1000v,where V is ml of EDTA consumed and v is volume of sample.


## 4.2. Calcium

Measured volume of 1 ml sodium hydroxide solution was added to 50 mL of water sample and 0.2 g solution (ammonium purpurate and sodium chloride). A change in color was observed and the solution was titrated against EDTA in the presence of the indicator NaOH solution [15]. Calcium was calculated as(2)calcium hardnessmg/L=V∗400.8v,where V is ml of EDTA consumed and v is volume of sample.


## 4.3. Magnesium

The value of calcium (as CaCO3) was deducted from total hardness (as CaCO3) [15]. Magnesium was calculated asMagnesium (as CaCO3) (mg/L) = Total hardness (as CaCO3) - Calcium (as CaCO3).


## 4.4. Chloride

After adjusting the pH of water between 7 and 10 (with the addition of H2SO4 and NaOH), 50 mL of water was titrated against AgNO3 in the presence of indicator K2Cr2O4 and change in color was noticed [15]. The process was repeated for blank. Chloride was calculated as(3)chloridemg/L=A−B∗S∗35.5∗1000v,where A denotes AgNO3 consumed by sample, B denotes AgNO3 consumed by blank, S denotes strength of AgNO3, and v denotes volume of sample.


## 4.5. Residual Chlorine

In a clean and chemical leached conical flask, 5 mL acetic acid and 50 mL sample were mixed. 1 mL of potassium iodide was added in the solution which was titrated against 0.025 N Na2S2O3. After adding starch solution, titration was again done against 0.025 N Na2S2O3 [15]. As a quality control blank was run using the same methodology. Residual chlorine was calculated as(4)residual chlorinemg/L=V∗S∗35.46∗1000v,where S denotes strength of Na2S2O3, V denotes volume of Na2S2O3 consumed, and v denotes volume of sample.


## 4.6. Fluoride

First value was set to 0 at 570 nm with the help of reference solution. The absorbance was taken in a clean, chemical leached cuvette containing 5 mL water and 50μL NaAsO2 [15]. As a quality control blank was run using the same methodology.


## 4.7. Sodium and Potassium

After calibrating the flame photometer at 589 nm for sodium and 768 nm for potassium (NaCl solutions of standards 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mg/L; KCl solution of standards 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mg/L), respectively, 5 ml water sample was taken in a clean, chemical leached, and dry tube. In case of excess concentration of sodium in the sample, dilution was done with deionized water and dilution factor was applied to the obtained value in flame photometer [15].


## 4.8. Trace Elements

About 500 mL water filtered using membrane filter was stored in 4°C in a chemical leached bottle. The heavy metals were detected using Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (FAAS) AA-7000 manufactured by Shimadzu, Japan, with ASC-7000 autosampler [15]. The instrumental parameters set for the analysis of the elements analyzed is tabulated separately as follows (Table 1).Table 1
Instrumental parameters set for the analysis of the trace elements in AA-7000 (F-AAS).
ElementsWavelength (nm)Slit width (nm)Lamp current (mA)Flow rate of air acetylene flame (L/min)AcetyleneAirIron248.30.2122.215Zinc213.90.781.8Silver328.10.220.9Copper324.80.781.8Cadmium228.80.741.2Cobalt240.70.2121.6Nickel232.00.2121.6Lead283.30.551.5L: liter(s); nm: nanometer; mA: milliamperes; min: minute.The water samples were analyzed for each element mentioned in the above table under similar parameters described for corresponding elements and the concentration for each sample was determined by the software. 100 mL distilled water with 1-2 mL conc. HNO3 was taken as blank solution for the measurements.


## 4.9. Quality Control

Strict chemical leaching procedures were followed for quality control [4]. To obtain reliable physiochemical results, a sample was processed 3 times. Instruments and equipment were calibrated before use.


## 5. Data Analysis

Data analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 19.


## 6. Results

A total of 100 samples of bottled water were collected according to their local availability and popularity in Kathmandu valley. The samples were examined for physicochemical parameters to assess the quality of bottled water. A total of 50 (25 monsoon and 25 postmonsoon) 20 L water bottles and 50 (25 monsoon and 25 postmonsoon) vessels of 1 L were examined in this study.


## 7. Assessment of Physical Parameters of Water

### 7.1. pH

The pH of the bottled water ranged from 5.2 to 8.2 (M = 5.96, SD = 0.54). The pH ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 5.2–6.6 (M = 5.88, SD = 0.40) and 5.2–6.8 (M = 5.94, SD = 0.41), respectively. The pH ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 5.2–8.0 (M = 5.94, SD = 0.56) and 5.2–8.2 (M = 6.01, SD = 0.65), respectively. These results are presented in Table 2 and represented in Figure 1.Table 2
Association between physical parameters (as per IBWA guideline), volume of bottled water, and season.
SnVolume (L)Physical parameterMonsoon seasonPostmonsoon seasonPermissible value as per IBWA guidelineM ± SDAM ± SDA11pH5.94 ± 0.56∗6.01 ± 0.65∗6.5–8.5∗205.96 ± 0.54∗5.88 ± 0.4∗21Electrical conductivity56.24 ± 58.93NA61.44 ± 52.57NANA2069.48 ± 67.5861.10 ± 62.3431Total dissolved solids4.12 ± 3.48NA3.84 ± 3.42NA500205.28 ± 3.884.44 ± 4.0141Turbidity0.38 ± 0.096250.399 ± 0.121250.5200.414 ± 0.257250.42 ± 0.25525NA: value not available in guideline;M: mean; SD: standard deviation; A: acceptability. ∗ indicates guideline not enforceable by IBWA.Figure 1
Distribution of pH value with respect to season and bottled water.Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the pH and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.387 at 95% confidence interval).


### 7.2. Electrical Conductivity (EC)

Electrical conductivity of the bottled water ranged from 5μS/cm to 199 μS/cm (M = 59.97 μS/cm, SD = 58.65). The electrical conductivity ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 7 μS/cm–189 μS/cm (M = 69.48 μS/cm, SD = 67.58) and 5 μS/cm–199 μS/cm (M = 61.10 μS/cm, SD = 62.34), respectively. The electrical conductivity ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 5 μS/cm–199 μS/cm (M = 56.24 μS/cm, SD = 58.93) and 5 μS/cm–191 μS/cm (M = 61.44 μS/cm, SD = 52.57), respectively. These results are presented in Table 2 and represented in Figure 2.Figure 2
Distribution of electrical conductivity value with respect to season and bottled water.Pearson’s correlation implies that there is a significant positive association between EC and TDS (r = 0.251), between EC and turbidity (r = 0.198), and between EC and chloride (r = 0.234), as seen in Table 3. Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the EC and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.146 at 95% confidence interval).Table 3
Correlation between physical parameters and chemical parameters.
ParameterspHECTDSTurbidityChlorideTotal hardnessCalciumMagnesiumIronCopperCobaltNickelFluorideSodiumPotassiumpH10.0020.127−0.096−0.7300.1580.8000.1340.100−0.123−0.030−0.1390.1570.0030.391EC10.251∗0.198∗0.234∗0.0940.1150.1620.0760.062−0.0230.182−0.0650.1230.381TDS10.1670.102−0.0720.003−0.063−0.0300.0470.0180.301−0.0380.1350.141Turbidity10.0630.0970.0780.0530.049−0.1070.031−0.071−0.003−0.129−0.078Chloride10.255∗−0.0080.207∗−0.017−0.0780.0790.0340.024−0.0330.531∗Total hardness10.394∗∗0.636∗∗0.1190.0400.054−0.0610.1620.0580.317Calcium10.1360.190−0.0310.020−0.2440.204∗0.1440.409Magnesium10.0220.1100.0620.0160.162−0.034−0.113Iron1−0.0230.1030.1100.280∗∗0.1610.246Copper1−0.100−0.122−0.047−0.014−0.162Cobalt1−0.094−0.091−0.212∗0.046Nickel1−0.171−0.214−0.419Fluoride1−0.032−0.003Sodium10.458∗Potassium1Symbol∗ indicates that correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). Symbol ∗∗ indicates that correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).


### 7.3. Total Dissolved Solid (TDS)

Total dissolved solid of the bottled water ranged from 1 mg/L to 15 mg/L (M = 4.42 mg/L, SD = 3.69). The total dissolved solid ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 1 mg/L–15 mg/L (M = 5.28 mg/L, SD = 3.88) and 1 mg/L–15 mg/L (M = 4.44 mg/L, SD = 4.01), respectively. The total dissolved solid ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 1 mg/L–12 mg/L (M = 4.12 mg/L, SD = 3.48) and 1 mg/L–15 mg/L (M = 3.84 mg/L, SD = 3.42), respectively. These results are presented in Table 2 and represented in Figure 3.Figure 3
Distribution of total dissolved solid value with respect to season and bottled water.Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the TDS and seasons (premonsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p = 0.617 at 95% confidence interval).


### 7.4. Turbidity

Turbidity of the bottled water ranged from 0.2 NTU to 1.55 NTU (M = 0.408 NTU, SD = 0.195). The turbidity ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.2 NTU–1.55 NTU (M = 0.414 NTU, SD = 0.257) and 0.2 NTU–1.55 NTU (M = 0.420 NTU, SD = 0.255), respectively. The turbidity ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.2 NTU–0.53 NTU (M = 0.380 NTU, SD = 0.096) and 0.21 mg/L – 0.58 mg/L (M = 0.399 NTU, SD = 0.121), respectively. All 100 samples had turbidity value at acceptable range as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table 2 and represented in Figure 4.Figure 4
Distribution of turbidity value with respect to season and bottled water.Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the turbidity and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.688 at 95% confidence interval).


## 7.1. pH

The pH of the bottled water ranged from 5.2 to 8.2 (M = 5.96, SD = 0.54). The pH ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 5.2–6.6 (M = 5.88, SD = 0.40) and 5.2–6.8 (M = 5.94, SD = 0.41), respectively. The pH ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 5.2–8.0 (M = 5.94, SD = 0.56) and 5.2–8.2 (M = 6.01, SD = 0.65), respectively. These results are presented in Table 2 and represented in Figure 1.Table 2
Association between physical parameters (as per IBWA guideline), volume of bottled water, and season.
SnVolume (L)Physical parameterMonsoon seasonPostmonsoon seasonPermissible value as per IBWA guidelineM ± SDAM ± SDA11pH5.94 ± 0.56∗6.01 ± 0.65∗6.5–8.5∗205.96 ± 0.54∗5.88 ± 0.4∗21Electrical conductivity56.24 ± 58.93NA61.44 ± 52.57NANA2069.48 ± 67.5861.10 ± 62.3431Total dissolved solids4.12 ± 3.48NA3.84 ± 3.42NA500205.28 ± 3.884.44 ± 4.0141Turbidity0.38 ± 0.096250.399 ± 0.121250.5200.414 ± 0.257250.42 ± 0.25525NA: value not available in guideline;M: mean; SD: standard deviation; A: acceptability. ∗ indicates guideline not enforceable by IBWA.Figure 1
Distribution of pH value with respect to season and bottled water.Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the pH and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.387 at 95% confidence interval).


## 7.2. Electrical Conductivity (EC)

Electrical conductivity of the bottled water ranged from 5μS/cm to 199 μS/cm (M = 59.97 μS/cm, SD = 58.65). The electrical conductivity ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 7 μS/cm–189 μS/cm (M = 69.48 μS/cm, SD = 67.58) and 5 μS/cm–199 μS/cm (M = 61.10 μS/cm, SD = 62.34), respectively. The electrical conductivity ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 5 μS/cm–199 μS/cm (M = 56.24 μS/cm, SD = 58.93) and 5 μS/cm–191 μS/cm (M = 61.44 μS/cm, SD = 52.57), respectively. These results are presented in Table 2 and represented in Figure 2.Figure 2
Distribution of electrical conductivity value with respect to season and bottled water.Pearson’s correlation implies that there is a significant positive association between EC and TDS (r = 0.251), between EC and turbidity (r = 0.198), and between EC and chloride (r = 0.234), as seen in Table 3. Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the EC and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.146 at 95% confidence interval).Table 3
Correlation between physical parameters and chemical parameters.
ParameterspHECTDSTurbidityChlorideTotal hardnessCalciumMagnesiumIronCopperCobaltNickelFluorideSodiumPotassiumpH10.0020.127−0.096−0.7300.1580.8000.1340.100−0.123−0.030−0.1390.1570.0030.391EC10.251∗0.198∗0.234∗0.0940.1150.1620.0760.062−0.0230.182−0.0650.1230.381TDS10.1670.102−0.0720.003−0.063−0.0300.0470.0180.301−0.0380.1350.141Turbidity10.0630.0970.0780.0530.049−0.1070.031−0.071−0.003−0.129−0.078Chloride10.255∗−0.0080.207∗−0.017−0.0780.0790.0340.024−0.0330.531∗Total hardness10.394∗∗0.636∗∗0.1190.0400.054−0.0610.1620.0580.317Calcium10.1360.190−0.0310.020−0.2440.204∗0.1440.409Magnesium10.0220.1100.0620.0160.162−0.034−0.113Iron1−0.0230.1030.1100.280∗∗0.1610.246Copper1−0.100−0.122−0.047−0.014−0.162Cobalt1−0.094−0.091−0.212∗0.046Nickel1−0.171−0.214−0.419Fluoride1−0.032−0.003Sodium10.458∗Potassium1Symbol∗ indicates that correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). Symbol ∗∗ indicates that correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).


## 7.3. Total Dissolved Solid (TDS)

Total dissolved solid of the bottled water ranged from 1 mg/L to 15 mg/L (M = 4.42 mg/L, SD = 3.69). The total dissolved solid ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 1 mg/L–15 mg/L (M = 5.28 mg/L, SD = 3.88) and 1 mg/L–15 mg/L (M = 4.44 mg/L, SD = 4.01), respectively. The total dissolved solid ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 1 mg/L–12 mg/L (M = 4.12 mg/L, SD = 3.48) and 1 mg/L–15 mg/L (M = 3.84 mg/L, SD = 3.42), respectively. These results are presented in Table 2 and represented in Figure 3.Figure 3
Distribution of total dissolved solid value with respect to season and bottled water.Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the TDS and seasons (premonsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p = 0.617 at 95% confidence interval).


## 7.4. Turbidity

Turbidity of the bottled water ranged from 0.2 NTU to 1.55 NTU (M = 0.408 NTU, SD = 0.195). The turbidity ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.2 NTU–1.55 NTU (M = 0.414 NTU, SD = 0.257) and 0.2 NTU–1.55 NTU (M = 0.420 NTU, SD = 0.255), respectively. The turbidity ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.2 NTU–0.53 NTU (M = 0.380 NTU, SD = 0.096) and 0.21 mg/L – 0.58 mg/L (M = 0.399 NTU, SD = 0.121), respectively. All 100 samples had turbidity value at acceptable range as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table 2 and represented in Figure 4.Figure 4
Distribution of turbidity value with respect to season and bottled water.Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the turbidity and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.688 at 95% confidence interval).


## 8. Assessment of Chemical Parameters

### 8.1. Total Hardness

Total hardness in the bottled water ranged from 0.8 mg/L to 31 mg/L (M = 14.78 mg/L, SD = 8.43). The total hardness ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 4.9 mg/L–25.9 mg/L (M = 15.40 mg/L, SD = 8.24) and 4.7 mg/L–31.0 mg/L (M = 14.82 mg/L, SD = 8.71), respectively. The total hardness ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon season were found to be 0.8 mg/L–31.0 mg/L (M = 13.76 mg/L, SD = 8.71) and 2.8 mg/L–31.0 mg/L (M = 15.14 mg/L, SD = 8.47), respectively. All 100 samples had total hardness concentration at acceptable range as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table 4 and represented in Figure 5.Table 4
Association between chemical parameters (as per IBWA guideline), volume of bottled water, and season.
SnMicronutrientVolume (L)Monsoon seasonPostmonsoon seasonPermissible value as per IBWA guidelineM ± SDDAM ± SDDA1Residual chlorine1NANA0.1202Chloride17.96 ± 3.1925256.34 ± 2.752525250207.7 ± 3.3325258.05 ± 3.4125253Total hardness (as CaCO3)114.82 ± 8.7125NA15.06 ± 8.6125NANA2015.20 ± 8.502513.73 ± 8.75254Calcium (as CaCO3)12.9 ± 1.4125NA3.58 ± 1.4625NANA203.54 ± 1.8253.01 ± 1.49255Magnesium (as CaCO3)110.86 ± 8.2125NA11.18 ± 7.625NANA2011.86 ± 8.452511.8 ± 7.84256Iron10.0037 ± 0.00222250.0028 ± 0.001724250.3200.003 ± 0.001122250.0033 ± 0.001723257Zinc1252552025258Silver1NANA0.025209Copper10.0084 ± 0.010725250.0073 ± 0.010724251200.0105 ± 0.010624250.0101 ± 0.0142242510Cadmium125250.00520252511Cobalt10.0283 ± 0.010625NA0.0184 ± 0.011925NANA200.0272 ± 0.0153250.267 ± 0.01062512Nickel10.0089 ± 0.00868NA0.0079 ± 0.00948NANA200.0076 ± 0.0079100.0088 ± 0.0086813Lead125250.00520252514Fluoride10.047 ± 0.0142625250.049 ± 0.01625253200.046 ± 0.015924250.048 ± 0.129252515Sodium112.36 ± 13.3525NA14.92 ± 9.4725NANA2012.83 ± 10.392510.5 ± 10.182516Potassium10.7 ± 0.082NA0.99 ± 0.315NANA202.68 ± 3.3670.45 ± 0.375NA: value not available in guideline;M: mean; -: BDL; SD: standard deviation; A: acceptability; D: no. of water samples in which elements were detected.Figure 5
Distribution of total hardness concentration with respect to season and bottled water.Pearson’s correlation implies that there is a significant positive association between total hardness and calcium (as CaCO3) (r = 0.394) and between total hardness and magnesium (as CaCO3) (r = 0.636), as seen in Table 3. Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the total hardness and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.717 at 95% confidence interval).


### 8.2. Calcium

Calcium (as CaCo3) in the bottled water ranged from 0.4 mg/L to 6.2 mg/L (M = 3.26 mg/L, SD = 1.55). The calcium (as CaCO3) ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.4 mg/L–6.2 mg/L (M = 3.54 mg/L, SD = 1.80) and 1.2 mg/L–6.2 mg/L (M = 3.01 mg/L, SD = 1.49), respectively. The calcium (as CaCO3) ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.4 mg/L–6.2 mg/L (M = 2.90 mg/L, SD = 1.41) and 1.4 mg/L–6.0 mg/L (M = 3.58 mg/L, SD = 1.46), respectively. All 100 samples had calcium (as CaCO3) concentration at acceptable range as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table 4 and represented in Figure 6.Figure 6
Distribution of calcium concentration with respect to season and bottled water.Pearson’s correlation implies that there is a significant positive association between calcium (as CaCO3) and fluoride (r = 0.204) as seen in Table 3. Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the calcium and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.345 at 95% confidence interval).


### 8.3. Magnesium

Magnesium (as CaCo3) in the bottled water ranged from 0.2 mg/L to 28.0 mg/L (M = 11.51 mg/L, SD = 7.92). The magnesium (as CaCo3) ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 1.4 mg/L–25.5 mg/L (M = 11.86 mg/L, SD = 8.45) and 2.1 mg/L–28.0 mg/L (M = 11.8 mg/L, SD = 7.84), respectively. The magnesium (as CaCo3) ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.4 mg/L–27.1 mg/L (M = 10.86 mg/L, SD = 8.21) and 0–27.1 mg/L (M = 11.18 mg/L, SD = 7.6), respectively. All 100 samples had magnesium (as CaCO3) concentration at acceptable range as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table 4 and represented in Figure 7.Figure 7
Distribution of magnesium concentration with respect to season and bottled water.Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the magnesium and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.350 at 95% confidence interval).


### 8.4. Residual Chlorine

All the hundred samples were subjected to titration for determination of residual chlorine. Residual chlorine was not detected and hence the samples were acceptable as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table4.


### 8.5. Chloride

Chloride concentration in the bottled water ranged from 2.5 mg/L to 15.9 mg/L (M = 7.51 mg/L, SD = 3.21). The chloride concentration ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 2.9 mg/L–14.8 mg/L (M = 7.70 mg/L, SD = 3.33) and 2.9 mg/L–15.9 mg/L (M = 8.05 mg/L, SD = 3.41), respectively. The chloride concentration ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 4.2 mg/L–15.9 mg/L (M = 7.96 mg/L, SD = 3.19) and 2.5 mg/L–14.8 mg/L (M = 6.34 mg/L, SD = 2.75), respectively. All 100 samples had chloride concentration at acceptable range as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table 4 and represented in Figure 8.Figure 8
Distribution of chloride concentration with respect to season and bottled water.Pearson’s correlation implies that there is a significant positive association between chlorine and total hardness (r = 0.255), between chlorine and magnesium (as CaCO3) (r = 0.207), and between chlorine and potassium (r = 0.531), as seen in Table 3. Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the chloride and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.544 at 95% confidence interval).


### 8.6. Iron

Iron concentration in the bottled water ranged from 0.0002 mg/L to 0.0090 mg/L (M = 0.0032 mg/L, SD = 0.0017). The iron concentration ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.0009 mg/L–0.0049 mg/L (M = 0.0030 mg/L, SD = 0.0011) and 0.0009 mg/L–0.0090 mg/L (M = 0.0033 mg/L, SD = 0.0017), respectively. The iron concentration ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.0018 mg/L–0.0090 mg/L (M = 0.0037 mg/L, SD = 0.0020) and 0.0002 mg/L–0.0070 mg/L (M = 0.0028 mg/L, SD = 0.0017), respectively. All 100 samples had iron concentration at acceptable range as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table 4 and represented in Figure 9.Figure 9
Distribution of iron concentration with respect to season and bottled water.Pearson’s correlation implies that there is a significant positive association between iron and fluoride (r = 0.280), as seen in Table 3. Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the iron and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.693 at 95% confidence interval).


### 8.7. Zinc

All the hundred samples were subjected to FAAS for determination of zinc concentration. Zinc was not detected and hence the samples were acceptable as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table4.


### 8.8. Silver

All the hundred samples were subjected to FAAS for determination of silver concentration. Silver was not detected and hence the samples were acceptable as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table4.


### 8.9. Copper

Copper concentration in the bottled water ranged from 0.0008 mg/L to 0.0559 mg/L (M = 0.0091 mg/L, SD = 0.0116). The copper concentration ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.0008 mg/L–0.0557 mg/L (M = 0.0105 mg/L, SD = 0.0106) and 0.0002 mg/L–0.0559 mg/L (M = 0.0101 mg/L, SD = 0.0142), respectively. The copper concentration ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.0008 mg/L–0.0557 mg/L (M = 0.0084 mg/L, SD = 0.0107) and 0.0005 mg/L–0.0557 mg/L (M = 0.0073 mg/L, SD = 0.0107), respectively. All 100 samples had copper concentration at acceptable range as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table 4 and represented in Figure 10.Figure 10
Distribution of copper concentration with respect to season and bottled water.Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the copper and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.761 at 95% confidence interval).


### 8.10. Cadmium

All the hundred samples were subjected to FAAS for determination of cadmium concentration. Cadmium was not detected and hence the samples were acceptable as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table4.


### 8.11. Cobalt

Cobalt concentration in the bottled water ranged from 0.0005 mg/L to 0.0559 mg/L (M = 0.2520 mg/L, SD = 0.0127). The cobalt concentration ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.0120 mg/L–0.0524 mg/L (M = 0.0272 mg/L, SD = 0.0153) and 0.0120 mg/L – 0.0524 mg/L (M = 0.0267 mg/L, SD = 0.0106), respectively. The cobalt concentration ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.0142 mg/L–0.0524 mg/L (M = 0.0283 mg/L, SD = 0.0106) and 0.0005 mg/L–0.0413 mg/L (M = 0.0184 mg/L, SD = 0.0119), respectively. All 100 samples had cobalt concentration at acceptable range as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table 4 and represented in Figure 11.Figure 11
Distribution of cobalt concentration with respect to season and bottled water.Pearson’s correlation implies that there is a significant positive association between cobalt and sodium (r = 0.212), as seen in Table 3. Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the cobalt and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.649 at 95% confidence interval).


### 8.12. Nickel

Nickel concentration in the bottled water ranged from 0.0008 mg/L to 0.0230 mg/L (M = 0.0080 mg/L, SD = 0.0082). The nickel concentration ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.0015 mg/L–0.0230 mg/L (M = 0.0076 mg/L, SD = 0.0079) and 0.0017 mg/L–0.0230 mg/L (M = 0.0088 mg/L, SD = 0.0086), respectively. The nickel concentration ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.0017 mg/L–0.0230 mg/L (M = 0.0089 mg/L, SD = 0.0086) and 0.0008 mg/L–0.230 mg/L (M = 0.0079 mg/L, SD = 0.0094), respectively. All 100 samples had nickel concentration at acceptable range as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table 4 and represented in Figure 12.Figure 12
Distribution of nickel concentration with respect to season and bottled water.Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the nickel and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.513 at 95% confidence interval), as seen in Table 3.


### 8.13. Lead

All the hundred samples were subjected to FAAS for determination of lead concentration. Lead was not detected and hence the samples were acceptable as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table4.


### 8.14. Fluoride

Fluoride concentration in the bottled water ranged from 0.024 mg/L to 0.077 mg/L (M = 0.047 mg/L, SD = 0.0139). The fluoride concentration ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.024 mg/L–0.077 mg/L (M = 0.046 mg/L, SD = 0.0159) and 0.024 mg/L–0.074 mg/L (M = 0.048 mg/L, SD = 0.1290), respectively. The fluoride concentration ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.029 mg/L–0.068 mg/L (M = 0.047 mg/L, SD = 0.01426) and 0.026 mg/L–0.077 mg/L (M = 0.049 mg/L, SD = 0.016), respectively. All 100 samples had fluoride concentration at acceptable range as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table 4 and represented in Figure 13.Figure 13
Distribution of fluoride concentration with respect to season and bottled water.Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the fluoride and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.792 at 95% confidence interval), as seen in Table 3.


### 8.15. Sodium

Sodium concentration in the bottled water ranged from 0.1 mg/L to 54.0 mg/L (M = 12.65 mg/L, SD = 10.90). The sodium concentration ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.1 mg/L–29.7 mg/L (M = 12.83 mg/L, SD = 10.39) and 0.6 mg/L–36.7 mg/L (M = 10.50 mg/L, SD = 10.18), respectively. The sodium concentration ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.6 mg/L–54.0 mg/L (M = 12.36 mg/L, SD = 13.35) and 0.6 mg/L–30.1 mg/L (M = 14.92 mg/L, SD = 9.47), respectively. All 100 samples had sodium concentration at acceptable range as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table 4 and represented in Figure 14.Figure 14
Distribution of sodium concentration with respect to season and bottled water.Pearson’s correlation implies that there is a significant positive association between sodium and potassium (r = 0.458), as seen in Table 3. Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the sodium and seasons (premonsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.426 at 95% confidence interval).


### 8.16. Potassium

Potassium concentration in the bottled water ranged from 0.2 mg/L to 9.0 mg/L (M = 1.41 mg/L, SD = 2.00). The potassium concentration ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.5 mg/L–9.0 mg/L (M = 2.68 mg/L, SD = 3.36) and 0.2 mg/L–0.7 mg/L (M = 0.45 mg/L, SD = 0.37), respectively. The potassium concentration ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.6 mg/L–0.8 mg/L (M = 0.7 mg/L, SD = 0.08) and 0.6 mg/L–1.4 mg/L (M = 0.99 mg/L, SD = 0.31), respectively. All 100 samples had potassium concentration at acceptable range as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table 4 and represented in Figure 15.Figure 15
Distribution of potassium concentration with respect to season and bottled water.Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the potassium and seasons (premonsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.086 at 95% confidence interval).


## 8.1. Total Hardness

Total hardness in the bottled water ranged from 0.8 mg/L to 31 mg/L (M = 14.78 mg/L, SD = 8.43). The total hardness ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 4.9 mg/L–25.9 mg/L (M = 15.40 mg/L, SD = 8.24) and 4.7 mg/L–31.0 mg/L (M = 14.82 mg/L, SD = 8.71), respectively. The total hardness ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon season were found to be 0.8 mg/L–31.0 mg/L (M = 13.76 mg/L, SD = 8.71) and 2.8 mg/L–31.0 mg/L (M = 15.14 mg/L, SD = 8.47), respectively. All 100 samples had total hardness concentration at acceptable range as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table 4 and represented in Figure 5.Table 4
Association between chemical parameters (as per IBWA guideline), volume of bottled water, and season.
SnMicronutrientVolume (L)Monsoon seasonPostmonsoon seasonPermissible value as per IBWA guidelineM ± SDDAM ± SDDA1Residual chlorine1NANA0.1202Chloride17.96 ± 3.1925256.34 ± 2.752525250207.7 ± 3.3325258.05 ± 3.4125253Total hardness (as CaCO3)114.82 ± 8.7125NA15.06 ± 8.6125NANA2015.20 ± 8.502513.73 ± 8.75254Calcium (as CaCO3)12.9 ± 1.4125NA3.58 ± 1.4625NANA203.54 ± 1.8253.01 ± 1.49255Magnesium (as CaCO3)110.86 ± 8.2125NA11.18 ± 7.625NANA2011.86 ± 8.452511.8 ± 7.84256Iron10.0037 ± 0.00222250.0028 ± 0.001724250.3200.003 ± 0.001122250.0033 ± 0.001723257Zinc1252552025258Silver1NANA0.025209Copper10.0084 ± 0.010725250.0073 ± 0.010724251200.0105 ± 0.010624250.0101 ± 0.0142242510Cadmium125250.00520252511Cobalt10.0283 ± 0.010625NA0.0184 ± 0.011925NANA200.0272 ± 0.0153250.267 ± 0.01062512Nickel10.0089 ± 0.00868NA0.0079 ± 0.00948NANA200.0076 ± 0.0079100.0088 ± 0.0086813Lead125250.00520252514Fluoride10.047 ± 0.0142625250.049 ± 0.01625253200.046 ± 0.015924250.048 ± 0.129252515Sodium112.36 ± 13.3525NA14.92 ± 9.4725NANA2012.83 ± 10.392510.5 ± 10.182516Potassium10.7 ± 0.082NA0.99 ± 0.315NANA202.68 ± 3.3670.45 ± 0.375NA: value not available in guideline;M: mean; -: BDL; SD: standard deviation; A: acceptability; D: no. of water samples in which elements were detected.Figure 5
Distribution of total hardness concentration with respect to season and bottled water.Pearson’s correlation implies that there is a significant positive association between total hardness and calcium (as CaCO3) (r = 0.394) and between total hardness and magnesium (as CaCO3) (r = 0.636), as seen in Table 3. Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the total hardness and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.717 at 95% confidence interval).


## 8.2. Calcium

Calcium (as CaCo3) in the bottled water ranged from 0.4 mg/L to 6.2 mg/L (M = 3.26 mg/L, SD = 1.55). The calcium (as CaCO3) ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.4 mg/L–6.2 mg/L (M = 3.54 mg/L, SD = 1.80) and 1.2 mg/L–6.2 mg/L (M = 3.01 mg/L, SD = 1.49), respectively. The calcium (as CaCO3) ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.4 mg/L–6.2 mg/L (M = 2.90 mg/L, SD = 1.41) and 1.4 mg/L–6.0 mg/L (M = 3.58 mg/L, SD = 1.46), respectively. All 100 samples had calcium (as CaCO3) concentration at acceptable range as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table 4 and represented in Figure 6.Figure 6
Distribution of calcium concentration with respect to season and bottled water.Pearson’s correlation implies that there is a significant positive association between calcium (as CaCO3) and fluoride (r = 0.204) as seen in Table 3. Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the calcium and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.345 at 95% confidence interval).


## 8.3. Magnesium

Magnesium (as CaCo3) in the bottled water ranged from 0.2 mg/L to 28.0 mg/L (M = 11.51 mg/L, SD = 7.92). The magnesium (as CaCo3) ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 1.4 mg/L–25.5 mg/L (M = 11.86 mg/L, SD = 8.45) and 2.1 mg/L–28.0 mg/L (M = 11.8 mg/L, SD = 7.84), respectively. The magnesium (as CaCo3) ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.4 mg/L–27.1 mg/L (M = 10.86 mg/L, SD = 8.21) and 0–27.1 mg/L (M = 11.18 mg/L, SD = 7.6), respectively. All 100 samples had magnesium (as CaCO3) concentration at acceptable range as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table 4 and represented in Figure 7.Figure 7
Distribution of magnesium concentration with respect to season and bottled water.Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the magnesium and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.350 at 95% confidence interval).


## 8.4. Residual Chlorine

All the hundred samples were subjected to titration for determination of residual chlorine. Residual chlorine was not detected and hence the samples were acceptable as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table4.


## 8.5. Chloride

Chloride concentration in the bottled water ranged from 2.5 mg/L to 15.9 mg/L (M = 7.51 mg/L, SD = 3.21). The chloride concentration ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 2.9 mg/L–14.8 mg/L (M = 7.70 mg/L, SD = 3.33) and 2.9 mg/L–15.9 mg/L (M = 8.05 mg/L, SD = 3.41), respectively. The chloride concentration ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 4.2 mg/L–15.9 mg/L (M = 7.96 mg/L, SD = 3.19) and 2.5 mg/L–14.8 mg/L (M = 6.34 mg/L, SD = 2.75), respectively. All 100 samples had chloride concentration at acceptable range as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table 4 and represented in Figure 8.Figure 8
Distribution of chloride concentration with respect to season and bottled water.Pearson’s correlation implies that there is a significant positive association between chlorine and total hardness (r = 0.255), between chlorine and magnesium (as CaCO3) (r = 0.207), and between chlorine and potassium (r = 0.531), as seen in Table 3. Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the chloride and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.544 at 95% confidence interval).


## 8.6. Iron

Iron concentration in the bottled water ranged from 0.0002 mg/L to 0.0090 mg/L (M = 0.0032 mg/L, SD = 0.0017). The iron concentration ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.0009 mg/L–0.0049 mg/L (M = 0.0030 mg/L, SD = 0.0011) and 0.0009 mg/L–0.0090 mg/L (M = 0.0033 mg/L, SD = 0.0017), respectively. The iron concentration ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.0018 mg/L–0.0090 mg/L (M = 0.0037 mg/L, SD = 0.0020) and 0.0002 mg/L–0.0070 mg/L (M = 0.0028 mg/L, SD = 0.0017), respectively. All 100 samples had iron concentration at acceptable range as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table 4 and represented in Figure 9.Figure 9
Distribution of iron concentration with respect to season and bottled water.Pearson’s correlation implies that there is a significant positive association between iron and fluoride (r = 0.280), as seen in Table 3. Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the iron and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.693 at 95% confidence interval).


## 8.7. Zinc

All the hundred samples were subjected to FAAS for determination of zinc concentration. Zinc was not detected and hence the samples were acceptable as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table4.


## 8.8. Silver

All the hundred samples were subjected to FAAS for determination of silver concentration. Silver was not detected and hence the samples were acceptable as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table4.


## 8.9. Copper

Copper concentration in the bottled water ranged from 0.0008 mg/L to 0.0559 mg/L (M = 0.0091 mg/L, SD = 0.0116). The copper concentration ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.0008 mg/L–0.0557 mg/L (M = 0.0105 mg/L, SD = 0.0106) and 0.0002 mg/L–0.0559 mg/L (M = 0.0101 mg/L, SD = 0.0142), respectively. The copper concentration ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.0008 mg/L–0.0557 mg/L (M = 0.0084 mg/L, SD = 0.0107) and 0.0005 mg/L–0.0557 mg/L (M = 0.0073 mg/L, SD = 0.0107), respectively. All 100 samples had copper concentration at acceptable range as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table 4 and represented in Figure 10.Figure 10
Distribution of copper concentration with respect to season and bottled water.Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the copper and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.761 at 95% confidence interval).


## 8.10. Cadmium

All the hundred samples were subjected to FAAS for determination of cadmium concentration. Cadmium was not detected and hence the samples were acceptable as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table4.


## 8.11. Cobalt

Cobalt concentration in the bottled water ranged from 0.0005 mg/L to 0.0559 mg/L (M = 0.2520 mg/L, SD = 0.0127). The cobalt concentration ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.0120 mg/L–0.0524 mg/L (M = 0.0272 mg/L, SD = 0.0153) and 0.0120 mg/L – 0.0524 mg/L (M = 0.0267 mg/L, SD = 0.0106), respectively. The cobalt concentration ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.0142 mg/L–0.0524 mg/L (M = 0.0283 mg/L, SD = 0.0106) and 0.0005 mg/L–0.0413 mg/L (M = 0.0184 mg/L, SD = 0.0119), respectively. All 100 samples had cobalt concentration at acceptable range as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table 4 and represented in Figure 11.Figure 11
Distribution of cobalt concentration with respect to season and bottled water.Pearson’s correlation implies that there is a significant positive association between cobalt and sodium (r = 0.212), as seen in Table 3. Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the cobalt and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.649 at 95% confidence interval).


## 8.12. Nickel

Nickel concentration in the bottled water ranged from 0.0008 mg/L to 0.0230 mg/L (M = 0.0080 mg/L, SD = 0.0082). The nickel concentration ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.0015 mg/L–0.0230 mg/L (M = 0.0076 mg/L, SD = 0.0079) and 0.0017 mg/L–0.0230 mg/L (M = 0.0088 mg/L, SD = 0.0086), respectively. The nickel concentration ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.0017 mg/L–0.0230 mg/L (M = 0.0089 mg/L, SD = 0.0086) and 0.0008 mg/L–0.230 mg/L (M = 0.0079 mg/L, SD = 0.0094), respectively. All 100 samples had nickel concentration at acceptable range as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table 4 and represented in Figure 12.Figure 12
Distribution of nickel concentration with respect to season and bottled water.Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the nickel and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.513 at 95% confidence interval), as seen in Table 3.


## 8.13. Lead

All the hundred samples were subjected to FAAS for determination of lead concentration. Lead was not detected and hence the samples were acceptable as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table4.


## 8.14. Fluoride

Fluoride concentration in the bottled water ranged from 0.024 mg/L to 0.077 mg/L (M = 0.047 mg/L, SD = 0.0139). The fluoride concentration ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.024 mg/L–0.077 mg/L (M = 0.046 mg/L, SD = 0.0159) and 0.024 mg/L–0.074 mg/L (M = 0.048 mg/L, SD = 0.1290), respectively. The fluoride concentration ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.029 mg/L–0.068 mg/L (M = 0.047 mg/L, SD = 0.01426) and 0.026 mg/L–0.077 mg/L (M = 0.049 mg/L, SD = 0.016), respectively. All 100 samples had fluoride concentration at acceptable range as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table 4 and represented in Figure 13.Figure 13
Distribution of fluoride concentration with respect to season and bottled water.Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the fluoride and seasons (monsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.792 at 95% confidence interval), as seen in Table 3.


## 8.15. Sodium

Sodium concentration in the bottled water ranged from 0.1 mg/L to 54.0 mg/L (M = 12.65 mg/L, SD = 10.90). The sodium concentration ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.1 mg/L–29.7 mg/L (M = 12.83 mg/L, SD = 10.39) and 0.6 mg/L–36.7 mg/L (M = 10.50 mg/L, SD = 10.18), respectively. The sodium concentration ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.6 mg/L–54.0 mg/L (M = 12.36 mg/L, SD = 13.35) and 0.6 mg/L–30.1 mg/L (M = 14.92 mg/L, SD = 9.47), respectively. All 100 samples had sodium concentration at acceptable range as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table 4 and represented in Figure 14.Figure 14
Distribution of sodium concentration with respect to season and bottled water.Pearson’s correlation implies that there is a significant positive association between sodium and potassium (r = 0.458), as seen in Table 3. Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the sodium and seasons (premonsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.426 at 95% confidence interval).


## 8.16. Potassium

Potassium concentration in the bottled water ranged from 0.2 mg/L to 9.0 mg/L (M = 1.41 mg/L, SD = 2.00). The potassium concentration ranges for 20 L water bottles in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.5 mg/L–9.0 mg/L (M = 2.68 mg/L, SD = 3.36) and 0.2 mg/L–0.7 mg/L (M = 0.45 mg/L, SD = 0.37), respectively. The potassium concentration ranges for 1 L vessels in monsoon and postmonsoon seasons were found to be 0.6 mg/L–0.8 mg/L (M = 0.7 mg/L, SD = 0.08) and 0.6 mg/L–1.4 mg/L (M = 0.99 mg/L, SD = 0.31), respectively. All 100 samples had potassium concentration at acceptable range as per IBWA guideline. These results are presented in Table 4 and represented in Figure 15.Figure 15
Distribution of potassium concentration with respect to season and bottled water.Levene’s test for equity of variances indicated that the potassium and seasons (premonsoon and postmonsoon) demonstrated a statistically significant distribution (p=0.086 at 95% confidence interval).


## 9. Discussion

The pH value of water samples tested ranged from 5.2 to 8.2. Low pH values observed in most samples could be associated with CO2 saturation in the groundwater, which might be a common source for these industries [16]. Studies [8, 9, 14, 17] have found the link between low pH and peptic ulcer [18], gastroesophageal reflux disease [19, 20], low absorption of vitamins [21], and so forth. However, pH values of drinking water below 6.5 are not harmful for direct consumption from bottled water but are known to cause corrosion to metal pipes which may lead to elevated level of copper, lead, zinc, iron, and so forth in tap water [7].The value of electrical conductivity (EC) was found to range from 5 to 199 µS/cm. All the samples were within the acceptable limit and in agreement with studies carried out by Aris et al. [22], Danso-Boateng and Frimpong [16], Mihayo and Mkoma [23], and Sasikaran et al. [24], where electrical conductivity was found to be between 2 and 192 µS/cm, 5.93–93.2 µS/cm,17.4–280 µS/cm, and 19–253 µS/cm, respectively, as presented in Table 5. Lower EC values indicate low ionic concentration and higher EC values indicate higher ionic concentration. Lower EC values in bottled water might harm health of consumers [7].Table 5
Comparison of trace elements with IBWA guidelines with those of different authors.
SnMicronutrientIBWA guidelinesM ± SDCurrent studyKrachler and Shotyk [12] (Md)Aris et al. [22]Mihayo and Mkoma [23]Singla et al. [25]1pH6.5–8.5∗5.96 ± 0.54X7.329 ± 0.267.4 ± 0.16.93 ± 0.0232Electrical conductivity (μS/cm)NA59.97 ± 58.65X0.239 ± 0.066170.1 ± 111.5X3Total dissolved solids (ppm)5004.42 ± 3.69X167.20 ± 44.9376.6 ± 50.259.75 ± 53.344Turbidity (NTU)0.50.408 ± 0.195XX0.5 ± 0.5X5Residual chlorine (ppm)0.1BDLXXXX6Chloride (ppm)2507.51 ± 3.21XX17.2 ± 16.917.08 ± 4.587Total hardness (as CaCO3) (ppm)NA14.78 ± 8.43XX37.6 ± 17.622.49 ± 34.748Calcium (as CaCO3) (ppm)NA3.26 ± 1.5562.8X9.1 ± 3.78.33 ± 12.989Magnesium (as CaCO3) (ppm)NA11.51 ± 7.9213.4X3.6 ± 3.00.356 ± 0.62510Iron (ppm)0.30.0032 ± 0.00170.75X0.02 ± 0.010.010 ± 0.37511Zinc (ppm)5BDL0.6411.55 ± 13.11X0.005 ± 0.00712Silver (ppm)0.025BDLXXXX13Copper (ppm)10.0091 ± 0.01160.170.64 ± 0.53X0.746 ± 0.02214Cadmium (ppm)0.005BDL0.008XXX15Cobalt (ppm)NA0.2520 ± 0.01270.024XXX16Nickel (ppm)NA0.0080 ± 0.0082XXXX17Lead (ppm)0.005BDL0.009XX0.009 ± 0.01618Fluoride (ppm)30.047 ± 0.0139XXX0.079 ± 0.08219Sodium (ppm)NA12.65 ± 10.900.1722431.00 ± 29514.15X3.478 ± 2.07020Potassium (ppm)NA1.41 ± 2.00X2845.00 ± 2252.58X4.99 ± 1.243∗Not enforceable; NA: value not available in guideline; X: not assessed by the author; M ± SD: mean ± standard deviation; BDL: below detection limit; Md: median.Total dissolved solid (TDS) was found to be in the range of 1–15 mg/L. TDS is used to assess mineral content and is dependent on water source, local geology, and treatment scheme [26]. TDS is a measure of the cations and anions, and water close to 0 TDS has a flat taste [15].Turbidity values of the bottled water were found to be in the range of 0.2–1.55 NTU, which is within IBWA guideline values and in agreement with the study carried out by Farhadkhani et al. [27] whose range was 0.15–2.47 NTU. This implies that bottled water had low levels of particulate and organic matter. The main reason for this could be the effective processing and filtering system in bottled-water companies [28]. High turbidity is often associated with pathogens, including viruses, bacteria, and other parasites [29].The range of total hardness was found to be 0.8–31 mg/L. Consumption of soft water (<50 mg/L) lacking essential minerals (like calcium, magnesium, and other trace minerals) is harmful to the body as water low in mineral content could potentially result in depletion of the body’s minerals [11]. People drinking such treated water excrete huge amount of calcium, magnesium, and other trace minerals in their urine [7]. The more the mineral loss, the greater the risk for osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, hypothyroidism, coronary artery disease, high blood pressure, and a long list of degenerative diseases generally associated with premature ageing [30]. Likewise, cooking food in soft water pulls the minerals out of them and lowers their natural value [31].The calcium hardness in this study was found to be in the range of 0.4–6.2 mg/L, which is in agreement with results from Danso-Boateng and Frimpong [16]. Deficiency in calcium has been associated with a decrease in blood clotting factors [32]. Calcium is the most abundant mineral in the body; it makes up about 1.5% to 2% of the body weight and 39% of the total body minerals [30]. Approximately 99% of the calcium exists in the bones and teeth [32]. It is vital to every cell of the body for muscle contraction, nerve impulses, blood clotting, and many other uses [30]. A lack of calcium can cause osteoporosis (a disease in which the bones become extremely porous) [32]. A metabolite of vitamin D 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol is produced by kidney, which aids in calcium absorption in upper small intestine [30]. About 10 gm of calcium is filtered in 24 hours by the renal glomeruli [32]. Excretion through feces is more common in the human body but calcium is also excreted through sweat [30].The value of magnesium hardness was found to be in the range of 0.2 mg/L–28.0 mg/L. The result of this study was in agreement with Salehet al. [33]. It is found in certain enzyme like cocarboxylase [32]. Its absorption is increased by the parathyroid hormone [30]. Normal concentration of magnesium in blood is 1.7–2.6 mg/100 mL. It is also present in cerebrospinal fluid and muscle [32].Residual chlorine was below detection limit in all 100 samples. Chlorine is a powerful disinfectant that is mainly used for its residual effect. Residual chlorine has the potential to kill bacteria, some parasites, and algae and also inhibits the formation of biofilms [7, 11]. Its physiological functions are that it aids in amylase activation and production of hydrochloric acid in gastric juice [30]. In water at acidic pH and at room temperature, chlorine reacts to form hypochlorous acid and hypochlorite, which has antimicrobial property [7, 11].The range of chloride concentration of bottled water, 2.5–15.9 mg/L, was found to be within IBWA guideline value, that is, 250 mg/L. The finding of the study agreed with the studies of Alsulaili et al. [34], Mihayo and Mkoma [23], Mohsin et al. [35], and Singla et al. [25] who obtained their result in the ranges of 1.24–16.9 mg/L, 5.97–28.78 mg/L, 2.5–48.2 mg/L, 16–66 mg/L, and 12.4–28.5 mg/L, respectively, as presented in Table 5. Chloride can be an indicator of human pollution (sewage, industrial effluents, urban runoffs, etc.) or natural pollution due to geographical location [5, 7]. In tropical countries, addition of NaCl in the diet is of great importance, as NaCl is lost in the form of sweat [30].Iron concentration in this study was found to be in the range of 0.0002 mg/L–0.0090 mg/L. The results of this study agree with the results of Singla et al. [25], where iron concentration was in the range of BDL–0.040 mg/L, as presented in Table 5. Iron is an essential component of hemoglobin, myoglobin, cytochromes, cytochrome oxidase, catalase, and peroxidase [30]. Higher concentration of iron gives bitter taste, metallic taste, and stains clothes and promotes growth of iron-metabolizing bacteria [15].Zinc was below detection limit in all 100 samples. The result of this study agreed with the result of Singla et al. [25], where zinc concentration was in the range of BDL–0.015 mg/L, as presented in Table 5. Zinc is present in many enzymes such as carbonic anhydrase, alkaline phosphatase, pancreatic carboxylase peptides, cytosolic superoxide dismutase, and retinene reductase (aids in forming retina) [36].Copper was found to be in the range of 0.0008 mg/L–0.0559 mg/L. The results of this study agree with the results of Singla et al. [25], where copper concentration was in the range of 0.034–0.98 mg/L, as presented in Table 5. Some of its important physiological functions are hemoglobin synthesis, melanin formation, phospholipid synthesis, collagen synthesis, and maintaining integrity of myelin sheath [30].Cadmium was below detection limit in all 100 samples. Long-term exposure to lower levels leads to a build-up in the kidneys and possible kidney disease, lung damage, and fragile bones [37]. In a study conducted by Menke et al. [38], metals (barium, cadmium, cobalt, cesium, molybdenum, lead, antimony, thallium, tungsten, and uranium) were positively associated with diabetes, where metals catalyzed oxidative stress reactions and the resulting oxidative stress may decrease insulin gene promoter activity and insulin mRNA expression in islet’s β cells [36].Cobalt was found to be in the range of 0.0005 mg/L–0.0559 mg/L. Cobalt is an essential micronutrient as it forms part of vitamin B12 (necessary for normal erythrocyte formation) [30].Nickel was found to be in the range of BDL–0.0230 mg/L. Nickel can substitute calcium in physiological functions like nerve transmission and muscle contraction [39]. Nickel exists in human serum as nickel bound to ultrafilterable ligands, albumin-bound nickel, and macroglobulin-bound nickel [40]. Nickel is present in RNA and is also found to be bound to proteins (keratin and insulin), amino acids, and serum albumins and has been found to be involved in the transmission of genetic code (DNA and RNA) and it is also present in certain enzyme systems that metabolize sugars [41]. It also activates enzymes like arginase, trypsin, and acetyl coenzyme A and regulates blood pressure control, sperm physiology, sodium metabolism, and cardiovascular health [40].Lead was below detection limit in all 100 samples. The result of this study agrees with the results of Singla et al. [25], where lead concentration was in the range of BDL–0.058 mg/L, as presented in Table 5. Lead is not an essential component of our body but is always present in our body due to easy absorption by our body in various forms [30].Silver was below detection limit in all 100 samples. It shows antimicrobial activity (disinfectant property) only above 50μg/l in water [7]. Toxic effect of silver in human is argyria (skin and hair are heavily discolored) in the tissues [7]. Hair and nail growth provides a route for the excretion of silver from the human body, but most will be eliminated via the liver and kidneys [42]. Silver nitrate (recently claimed to be superior to many antibiotics) has been effective in inhibiting P. aeruginosa but can cause leakage of cellular electrolytes including sodium and potassium [43].Fluoride concentration in bottled water was found to be in the range of BDL–0.077 mg/L. The results of this study are in agreement with Singla et al. [25], where the average value of fluoride was found to be 0.014–0.25 mg/L, as presented in Table 5. Bottled water may not provide sufficient fluoride to maintain optimal dental, kidney, and skeletal health and most bottled water contains low concentration fluoride [44]. It is widely used in combination with vitamin D for treatment of osteoporosis [30]. Some abnormalities due to excessive amount of fluoride are dental fluorosis (molten enamel), hypercalcification of bones, neurological disturbances, and so forth [30].Sodium concentration in bottled water was found to be in the range of 0.1 mg/L–54.0 mg/L. The results of this study are in agreement with those of Aris et al. [22] who determined the values of sodium chloride in the range of 1.1–65.1 mg/L, as presented in Table 5. Presence of sodium concentration in bottled water might be due to treatment of reverse osmosis followed by addition of sodium carbonate and sodium bicarbonate. It plays an important role in developing high blood pressure [33]. It is also involved in initiating and maintaining the heart beat and in absorption of glucose, galactose, and amino acid from small intestine [30]. In diarrheal patients, it is lost in large amount; as a result, there is imbalance in electrolytes which may lead to morbidity [32]. Persons suffering from hypertension should not take more than 1 gm of sodium [30].Potassium concentration in bottled water was found to be in the range BDL–9.0 mg/L. The result of this study was consistent with studies carried out by Aris et al. [22], Saleh et al. [33], and Singla et al. [25], where estimated potassium concentrations were 1.32–4.44 mg/L, BDL–7.5 mg/L, and 1.21–6.51 mg/L, respectively, as presented in Table 5. Along with Na and K, it aids in acid-base balance and osmotic pressure [32]. It is essential for protein biosynthesis by ribosomes and is required by enzymes like pyruvate kinase [30]. Erythrocytes also contain large amount of potassium [32]. When in high concentration in bottled water, it may lead to renal disorders and other health concerns [30, 32].Water is a universal solvent as it has the capacity to dissolve many elements in ionic form. Bottled water contains minerals and ions beneficial to human life, which aid in electrolyte balance, and they are also required for formation of enzymes and hormone. As these chemicals detected in the bottled water are surplus for continued existence for a short period of time (e.g., fasting), these chemicals in bottled water must also be enough to aid the survival of microorganisms [45].


## 10. Conclusions

Water could have percolated down from the surface to the ground and as such the difference in concentration of trace elements in premonsoon and postmonsoon seasons could be noticeable. After assessing the trace elements, it has been found that the trace elements detected in the bottled water were within the permissible limit of IBWA guidelines. There are many trace elements, which are not taken into consideration especially by Department of Food Technology and Quality Control (DFTQC), IBWA, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and World Health Association (WHO) in the present guidelines. The role of trace elements in survival of microorganisms in bottled water could lead to a new wide door to epigenetics and metagenomics.



---

*Source: 8884700-2020-12-03.xml*