# Optimum Design of Oil Lubricated Thrust Bearing for Hard Disk Drive with High Speed Spindle Motor

Authors: Yuta Sunami; Mohd Danial Ibrahim; Hiromu Hashimoto
Journal: International Journal of Rotating Machinery
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

This paper presents the application of optimization method developed by Hashimoto to design oil lubricated thrust bearings for 2.5 inch form factor hard disk drives (HDD). The designing involves optimization of groove geometry and dimensions. Calculations are carried out to maximize the dynamic stiffness of the thrust bearing spindle motor. Static and dynamic characteristics of the modeled thrust bearing are calculated using the divergence formulation method. Results show that, by using the proposed optimization method, dynamic stiffness values can be well improved with the bearing geometries not being fixed to conventional grooves.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

HDD has been used as the main storage multimedia for electronics devices. Currently, HDD widely depends on oil lubricated hydrodynamic bearings. Hydrodynamic bearing is mainly supported by thrust and journal bearings. A schematic view of bearings in a 2.5 inch HDD is shown in Figures1 and 2.Figure 1
Bearings in spindle motor.Initial spiral thrust bearing groove geometry and pressure distribution; (a) groove geometry, (b) pressure distribution.
(a)
(b)Hydrodynamic bearing gives better performance characteristics compared to conventional ball bearings as it has high dynamic stiffness with additional much higher damping effects. These damping effect characteristics provide smaller nonrepeatable run-out (NRRO). NRRO is the major contributor to the track misregistration in HDD read-write mechanism. Even though the repeatable run-out (RRO) of oil lubricated hydrodynamic bearing is higher than the ball bearing spindle motor, the RRO can be corrected by a read-write servo. Therefore, to reduce NRRO and increase spindle performance is to improve the bearing performance.Currently, groove geometries that are being widely used in HDD thrust bearings are mainly a spiral or a herringbone grooved geometries.  Several investigators have conducted numerical analysis predictions of these grooves for HDD bearing performance [1–5]. There were also some attempts at improving the dynamic stiffness and damping of HDD spindle by introducing permanent magnetic thrust plates into the bearing spindle structure [6] or introducing magnetic fluid as lubricants [7]. However, there are very few attempts at finding an optimum design with a novel geometry to replace the conventional herringbone or spiral grooves for HDD. In the attempts at improving HDD performance, Arakawa et al. [8] proposed a nonuniform spiral groove for journal bearings to expand the critical bearing number for higher revolution speed of HDD spindle. The approach indicated that the novel nonuniform spiral grooves hydrodynamic bearings manage to increase the stability of rotation in high speeds.This suggests that there is a probability of a further improvement if the groove geometry is not being fixed to any conventional grooves, either spiral or herringbone grooves. However, as far as authors know, there are no attempts at drastically improving the bearing characteristics changing the geometry and dimensions for oil lubricated 2.5 inch HDD spindle motor. Recently, HDD is being demanded to be thinner. If the characteristic of thrust bearing can be drastically improved, it is possible for HDD to be thinner. Therefore, in this paper, by adapting the optimization method initiated by Hashimoto, new optimum groove geometry and dimension to replace conventional grooves and increase the bearing performance of an oil lubricated 2.5 inch HDD had been calculated. The groove geometry and dimension of the thrust bearing for spindle motor are calculated using the hybrid method [9, 10] with the improvement of dynamic stiffness K, being set as the objective function.The optimization results showed that the dynamic stiffness of oil lubricated thrust bearing can be improved by introducing a new optimum geometry into the system. Vibration analyses were also presented to numerically verify the applicability of the improved bearings.


## 2. Geometrical Optimization and Analysis of Bearing Characteristics

### 2.1. Modification of Groove Geometry

The geometrical optimization process is carried out using the hybrid method [9, 10], a combination of direct search method and successive quadratic programming (SQP) method. SQP is a powerful method to obtain the optimum solutions for nonlinear optimization problems. However, it sometimes can not find the global optimum solution when the objective function has the multipeaks. Therefore, the direct search method is used first to roughly search for several local optimum solutions; then, SQP is used to find the local optimum solutions when we set the initial values obtained by the direct search method. The global optimum solution is finally obtained by choosing the maximum or minimum value. Furthermore, the confirmation of the optimum solution is needed to clarify the validity of the optimum solution. The validity of the optimum solution is confirmed by comparing the value of the objective function calculated from the optimum design variables with those from randomly selected design variables.Figure3 shows the design parameters used in this optimization. The initial prescribed design parameters for thrust bearing in this paper, based on a commercialized 2.5 inch form factor HDD design, are shown in Table 1. Taking the spiral groove geometry as a threshold groove geometry, the groove geometry parameters of angle variation φ1 through φ4 are initially set to zero.Table 1
Initial 2.5 inch bearing parameters.
Parameters
Values
Outer radiusRout (m)
2.55
×
10
-
3
Inner radiusRin (m)
1.0
×
10
-
3
WeightWd (N)
0.185
Revolution speedns (rpm)
5000~20,000
Groove numberN
16
Seal ratiors
0.58
Groove depthhg (m)
1
.
0
×
10
-
5
Groove width ratioα=(b1/b1+b2)
0.5
Geometry parameterφ1 (deg)
0.0
Geometry parameterφ2 (deg)
0.0
Geometry parameterφ3 (deg)
0.0
Geometry parameterφ4 (deg)
0.0
Lubricant viscosityμ (Pa·s)
6.523
×
10
-
3Figure 3
Design parameters for thrust bearing.From there, the groove geometry design parameters are changed arbitrarily using the cubic spline interpolation function [9]. The cubic spline interpolation function is a cubic polynomial equation where each section connected to nodal points is a continuity of a second order derivative of the function.Figure4 shows the spiral groove geometry represented as initial values in the feasible region for optimum design of thrust bearing treated in this paper. Referring to the same figure, the initial line representing the spiral groove geometry, is shown with the label initial groove geometry while the new line of geometry after the spline interpolation function is calculated step by step as shown with the label kth step. The groove geometry parameter of φ1 through φ4 is set starting from inner region towards the outer region. The feasible region for the groove geometry is divided equally into four regions in the radial direction as there were no significant effects on the optimization with regions over the divisions of four.Figure 4
Modifications of groove geometry.With the most inner point of the initial spiral groove curve fixed at pointO′′, the angle variation of groove geometry is then evolved gradually from initial stage to the final stage.


### 2.2. Analysis of Bearing Characteristics

In this paper, applying the boundary-fitted coordinate system to adjust the geometrical optimization method derives the calculation method of bearing characteristics. Moreover, in the process of analyzing the static and dynamic characteristics of the bearings, the perturbation method is applied to the Reynolds equivalent equation. The Reynolds equivalent equation can be solved using the Newton-Raphson iteration method, and the static componentp0 and dynamic component pt of pressure are obtained. This detailed calculation method is shown in the appendix.The load-carrying capacityW is obtained by the following integration:
(1)W=∫02π∫r1r2{p0(hr0)-pa}rdrdθ,
where pa indicates the atmospheric pressure.The minimum oil lubricating film thicknesshr is simultaneously determined from the equilibrium condition between the axial load acting on a thrust bearing and the bearing load-carrying capacity. The minimum oil lubricating film thickness hr is obtained by solving the following force balance equation:
(2)W(hr)-mg=0.The spindle motor’s friction torque on bearing surface is given by the following integration:(3)Tr=∫r1r2∫02π(μr3ωsh0-rh02∂p0∂θ)drdθ,
where ωs is the angular velocity of the rotating shaft.The spring coefficientk and damping coefficient c can be obtained, respectively, by integrating the real and imaginary parts of the dynamic pressure components, pt, as follows:
(4)k=∫r1r2∫02πRe(-pt)rdθdrc=1ωf∫r1r2∫02πIm(-pt)rdθdr,
where ωf is the squeeze frequency of the shaft, which is angular frequency of harmonic vibration when the bearing is small vibrated in the axial direction under equilibrium condition, in the HDD obtained through the perturbation method the and modified Reynolds equation [9].Finally, the bearing stiffness,K, is given by the following equation:
(5)K=k2+(ωf·c)2.In this paper, the oil leak is not considered because the surround of thrust bearing of the spindle motor for 2.5 inch HDD, as shown in Figure1, is sealed.


## 2.1. Modification of Groove Geometry

The geometrical optimization process is carried out using the hybrid method [9, 10], a combination of direct search method and successive quadratic programming (SQP) method. SQP is a powerful method to obtain the optimum solutions for nonlinear optimization problems. However, it sometimes can not find the global optimum solution when the objective function has the multipeaks. Therefore, the direct search method is used first to roughly search for several local optimum solutions; then, SQP is used to find the local optimum solutions when we set the initial values obtained by the direct search method. The global optimum solution is finally obtained by choosing the maximum or minimum value. Furthermore, the confirmation of the optimum solution is needed to clarify the validity of the optimum solution. The validity of the optimum solution is confirmed by comparing the value of the objective function calculated from the optimum design variables with those from randomly selected design variables.Figure3 shows the design parameters used in this optimization. The initial prescribed design parameters for thrust bearing in this paper, based on a commercialized 2.5 inch form factor HDD design, are shown in Table 1. Taking the spiral groove geometry as a threshold groove geometry, the groove geometry parameters of angle variation φ1 through φ4 are initially set to zero.Table 1
Initial 2.5 inch bearing parameters.
Parameters
Values
Outer radiusRout (m)
2.55
×
10
-
3
Inner radiusRin (m)
1.0
×
10
-
3
WeightWd (N)
0.185
Revolution speedns (rpm)
5000~20,000
Groove numberN
16
Seal ratiors
0.58
Groove depthhg (m)
1
.
0
×
10
-
5
Groove width ratioα=(b1/b1+b2)
0.5
Geometry parameterφ1 (deg)
0.0
Geometry parameterφ2 (deg)
0.0
Geometry parameterφ3 (deg)
0.0
Geometry parameterφ4 (deg)
0.0
Lubricant viscosityμ (Pa·s)
6.523
×
10
-
3Figure 3
Design parameters for thrust bearing.From there, the groove geometry design parameters are changed arbitrarily using the cubic spline interpolation function [9]. The cubic spline interpolation function is a cubic polynomial equation where each section connected to nodal points is a continuity of a second order derivative of the function.Figure4 shows the spiral groove geometry represented as initial values in the feasible region for optimum design of thrust bearing treated in this paper. Referring to the same figure, the initial line representing the spiral groove geometry, is shown with the label initial groove geometry while the new line of geometry after the spline interpolation function is calculated step by step as shown with the label kth step. The groove geometry parameter of φ1 through φ4 is set starting from inner region towards the outer region. The feasible region for the groove geometry is divided equally into four regions in the radial direction as there were no significant effects on the optimization with regions over the divisions of four.Figure 4
Modifications of groove geometry.With the most inner point of the initial spiral groove curve fixed at pointO′′, the angle variation of groove geometry is then evolved gradually from initial stage to the final stage.


## 2.2. Analysis of Bearing Characteristics

In this paper, applying the boundary-fitted coordinate system to adjust the geometrical optimization method derives the calculation method of bearing characteristics. Moreover, in the process of analyzing the static and dynamic characteristics of the bearings, the perturbation method is applied to the Reynolds equivalent equation. The Reynolds equivalent equation can be solved using the Newton-Raphson iteration method, and the static componentp0 and dynamic component pt of pressure are obtained. This detailed calculation method is shown in the appendix.The load-carrying capacityW is obtained by the following integration:
(1)W=∫02π∫r1r2{p0(hr0)-pa}rdrdθ,
where pa indicates the atmospheric pressure.The minimum oil lubricating film thicknesshr is simultaneously determined from the equilibrium condition between the axial load acting on a thrust bearing and the bearing load-carrying capacity. The minimum oil lubricating film thickness hr is obtained by solving the following force balance equation:
(2)W(hr)-mg=0.The spindle motor’s friction torque on bearing surface is given by the following integration:(3)Tr=∫r1r2∫02π(μr3ωsh0-rh02∂p0∂θ)drdθ,
where ωs is the angular velocity of the rotating shaft.The spring coefficientk and damping coefficient c can be obtained, respectively, by integrating the real and imaginary parts of the dynamic pressure components, pt, as follows:
(4)k=∫r1r2∫02πRe(-pt)rdθdrc=1ωf∫r1r2∫02πIm(-pt)rdθdr,
where ωf is the squeeze frequency of the shaft, which is angular frequency of harmonic vibration when the bearing is small vibrated in the axial direction under equilibrium condition, in the HDD obtained through the perturbation method the and modified Reynolds equation [9].Finally, the bearing stiffness,K, is given by the following equation:
(5)K=k2+(ωf·c)2.In this paper, the oil leak is not considered because the surround of thrust bearing of the spindle motor for 2.5 inch HDD, as shown in Figure1, is sealed.


## 3. Formulation of Optimum Design and Vibration Analysis

### 3.1. Formulation of Optimum Design

In formulating the optimum design problems for groove geometry, the design variable of vectorX consisting of groove geometry design variables of angle variations φ1 through φ4 and groove dimension design variables of rs, hg, and α as shown in Figures 3 and 4 is defined as follows:
(6)X=(rs,hg,α,φ1,φ2,φ3,φ4),
where hg,rs=(Rs/Rout),  and  α=(b1/(b1+b2))  are the groove depth, the seal ratio, and the ratio of groove width, respectively. The seal ratio means ratio of seal part, and the ratio of groove width means ratio of groove part of the total surface area.Another design variable considered in this optimization is the number of grooves. However, since design variables of groove numbers are of discrete values, the optimization is preliminarily calculated step by step for the groove number fromN=6 to N=16. Then, the groove numbers, which gives the highest dynamic stiffness, is then selected as the optimum groove number. We had confirmed that the bearing characteristic, which is especially the dynamic stiffness, is decreased if the groove number is larger than N=16 and less than N=6 in both cases. In addition, it is difficult to manufacture the grooves on the bearing surface because the width of grooves becomes narrow due to increasing the groove numbers. Therefore, we chose the range of groove numbers from N=6 to N=16. This is also to save the computational time for obtaining the optimum solution.Furthermore, the constraint conditions based on a 2.5 inch HDD thrust bearing are expressed as(7)gi(X)≤0,(i=1~16),
where the details of the constraint functions are defined as in (8).In (8), besides the constraint function of groove geometries and dimensions from g1 through g14, the minimum oil lubricating film thickness hr obtained by (2) must be larger than the allowable film thickness to avoid bearing contact and seizures shown as g15. Meanwhile, the final constraint function represents the constraint variable of the damping coefficient being kept positive at all times to avoid self-induced vibrations. These values of prescribed constraint values are shown in Table 2:
(8)g1=rsmin-rs,g2=rs-rsmax,g3=hgmin-hg,g4=hg-hgmax,g5=αmin-α,g6=α-αmax,g7=φ1min-φ1,g8=φ1-φ1max,g9=φ2min-φ2,g10=φ2-φ2max,g11=φ3min-φ3,g12=φ3-φ3max,g13=φ4min-φ4,g14=φ4-φ4max,g15=ha-hr,g16=-c.Table 2
Prescribed constraint values.
Parameters
Values
Groove numberN
6,7
,
8
,
…
,
16
Minimum seal radius ratiorsmin
0.4
Maximum seal radius ratiorsmax
0.8
Minimum groove depthhgmin (m)
5.0
×
10
-
6
Maximum groove depthhgmax (m)
1
.
5
×
10
-
5
Minimum groove width ratioαmin
0.4
Maximum groove width ratioαmax
0.9
Minimum geometry parameterφ1~4min (deg)
−180
Maximum geometry parameterφ1~4max (deg)
180
Allowable film thicknessha (m)
2.0
×
10
-
6, 3.0×10-6, 4.0×10-6The objective function being set to improve the performance characteristics of the spindle in hydrodynamic bearing is the dynamic stiffness because thrust bearing plays an important role in supporting the total axial direction load of the HDD spindle. The dynamic stiffness,K, of the thrust bearing can be obtained through the following equation:
(9)f(X)=K.The optimization problem for HDD thrust bearing is then formulated as follows:(10)maxf(Χ)subjecttogi(Χ)≤0,(i=1~16).


### 3.2. Vibration Analysis

Once the optimization is being carried out, the vibration analysis is calculated to numerically verify the improvements. The vibration is conducted assuming that the oil film supporting the bearing is a viscously damped one degree free vibration model. The values of the spring and damping coefficient obtained by the optimum design are applied for the vibration response.The equation of motion is given by(11)mx¨+cx˙+kx=q(t),
where m is the mass of the disk platters, c and k are the damping and spring coefficients obtained by the above mentioned optimum design, respectively, and q(t) is the impulsive external force being applied to the disk platters.The external impulsive force being applied to the HDD disk platters is assumed as follows:(12)mωnx(t)I=(e-ζωnt1-ζ2)sinωdt,
where the natural angular frequency is expressed as ωn=k/m; the damped natural angular frequency is expressed as ωd=ωn1-ζ2 which is angular frequency of oscillatory wave form with viscous damping; the damping ratio and impulse are, respectively, expressed as ζ=c/2mk and I=f0Δt.The nondimensional expressions for the gainG and phase angle Φ are, then, calculated using the following equations:
(13)G=1{1-(ωf/ωn)2}2+4ζ2(ωf/ωn)2Φ=-tan-12ζ(ωf/ωn)1-(ωf/ωn)2.


## 3.1. Formulation of Optimum Design

In formulating the optimum design problems for groove geometry, the design variable of vectorX consisting of groove geometry design variables of angle variations φ1 through φ4 and groove dimension design variables of rs, hg, and α as shown in Figures 3 and 4 is defined as follows:
(6)X=(rs,hg,α,φ1,φ2,φ3,φ4),
where hg,rs=(Rs/Rout),  and  α=(b1/(b1+b2))  are the groove depth, the seal ratio, and the ratio of groove width, respectively. The seal ratio means ratio of seal part, and the ratio of groove width means ratio of groove part of the total surface area.Another design variable considered in this optimization is the number of grooves. However, since design variables of groove numbers are of discrete values, the optimization is preliminarily calculated step by step for the groove number fromN=6 to N=16. Then, the groove numbers, which gives the highest dynamic stiffness, is then selected as the optimum groove number. We had confirmed that the bearing characteristic, which is especially the dynamic stiffness, is decreased if the groove number is larger than N=16 and less than N=6 in both cases. In addition, it is difficult to manufacture the grooves on the bearing surface because the width of grooves becomes narrow due to increasing the groove numbers. Therefore, we chose the range of groove numbers from N=6 to N=16. This is also to save the computational time for obtaining the optimum solution.Furthermore, the constraint conditions based on a 2.5 inch HDD thrust bearing are expressed as(7)gi(X)≤0,(i=1~16),
where the details of the constraint functions are defined as in (8).In (8), besides the constraint function of groove geometries and dimensions from g1 through g14, the minimum oil lubricating film thickness hr obtained by (2) must be larger than the allowable film thickness to avoid bearing contact and seizures shown as g15. Meanwhile, the final constraint function represents the constraint variable of the damping coefficient being kept positive at all times to avoid self-induced vibrations. These values of prescribed constraint values are shown in Table 2:
(8)g1=rsmin-rs,g2=rs-rsmax,g3=hgmin-hg,g4=hg-hgmax,g5=αmin-α,g6=α-αmax,g7=φ1min-φ1,g8=φ1-φ1max,g9=φ2min-φ2,g10=φ2-φ2max,g11=φ3min-φ3,g12=φ3-φ3max,g13=φ4min-φ4,g14=φ4-φ4max,g15=ha-hr,g16=-c.Table 2
Prescribed constraint values.
Parameters
Values
Groove numberN
6,7
,
8
,
…
,
16
Minimum seal radius ratiorsmin
0.4
Maximum seal radius ratiorsmax
0.8
Minimum groove depthhgmin (m)
5.0
×
10
-
6
Maximum groove depthhgmax (m)
1
.
5
×
10
-
5
Minimum groove width ratioαmin
0.4
Maximum groove width ratioαmax
0.9
Minimum geometry parameterφ1~4min (deg)
−180
Maximum geometry parameterφ1~4max (deg)
180
Allowable film thicknessha (m)
2.0
×
10
-
6, 3.0×10-6, 4.0×10-6The objective function being set to improve the performance characteristics of the spindle in hydrodynamic bearing is the dynamic stiffness because thrust bearing plays an important role in supporting the total axial direction load of the HDD spindle. The dynamic stiffness,K, of the thrust bearing can be obtained through the following equation:
(9)f(X)=K.The optimization problem for HDD thrust bearing is then formulated as follows:(10)maxf(Χ)subjecttogi(Χ)≤0,(i=1~16).


## 3.2. Vibration Analysis

Once the optimization is being carried out, the vibration analysis is calculated to numerically verify the improvements. The vibration is conducted assuming that the oil film supporting the bearing is a viscously damped one degree free vibration model. The values of the spring and damping coefficient obtained by the optimum design are applied for the vibration response.The equation of motion is given by(11)mx¨+cx˙+kx=q(t),
where m is the mass of the disk platters, c and k are the damping and spring coefficients obtained by the above mentioned optimum design, respectively, and q(t) is the impulsive external force being applied to the disk platters.The external impulsive force being applied to the HDD disk platters is assumed as follows:(12)mωnx(t)I=(e-ζωnt1-ζ2)sinωdt,
where the natural angular frequency is expressed as ωn=k/m; the damped natural angular frequency is expressed as ωd=ωn1-ζ2 which is angular frequency of oscillatory wave form with viscous damping; the damping ratio and impulse are, respectively, expressed as ζ=c/2mk and I=f0Δt.The nondimensional expressions for the gainG and phase angle Φ are, then, calculated using the following equations:
(13)G=1{1-(ωf/ωn)2}2+4ζ2(ωf/ωn)2Φ=-tan-12ζ(ωf/ωn)1-(ωf/ωn)2.


## 4. Characteristics of Optimized Grooves

### 4.1. Groove Geometry and Dimensions of Optimized Bearings

Figures5(a)–5(c) show the groove geometry and pressure distribution of optimized oil lubricated bearings at 10,000 rpm with allowable film thickness of 2.0 μm, 3.0 μm, and 4.0 μm, respectively.Groove geometry and pressure distribution of optimized oil lubricated bearings. (a) Optimized at 10,000 rpm,ha=2 μm, (b) optimized at 10,000 rpm, ha=3 μm, (c) optimized at 10,000 rpm, ha=4 μm.
(a)
(b)
(c)As can be seen from the figures, all geometries of the optimized bearings changed from initial spiral groove geometry to a new geometry, a spiral groove with bends in the outer periphery. In this paper, such geometry is called the modified spiral geometry.Generally, it is widely known that spiral groove geometry has the ability to elevate the film thickness with its pump in effects as the revolution increases due to pressure generation. This explanation is applicable for the inner periphery of the optimized groove geometry. As the bearing rotates, the oil lubricants flows inwards, starting from the outer bends periphery, and flows along the grooves and collides with the seal, hence generating pressure. From all of the pressure distribution figures, the point where the groove and seal meet has the highest point of pressure generated.However, the phenomenon is different from the outer periphery for opposite spiral groove geometries. Instead of generating the pressure and increasing the film thickness, the oil lubricant flows away from the outer bends towards the most outer radius of the bearing surface. Hence, as can be seen from the pressure distribution figures, there are no pressure peaks generated in the vicinity of the most outer regions of the bearing surface. This is because the pressure in the outer periphery of the bearing is neutralized to the atmospheric pressure. The pressure equivalent to the atmospheric pressure caused by the outer geometry bends will act as a force to pull down the bearing and lower the film thickness. With the combination of spiral geometry in the inner periphery and the opposite spiral bends in the outer periphery, the film thickness decreased, thus maximizing the dynamic stiffness of the spindle.Even though all groove geometries basically possess the modified spiral geometry, Figure5(a) shows that the region of spiral groove of optimized with ha=2.0 μm is smaller than those of optimized with ha=3.0 μm and ha=4.0 μm. The geometry is concentrated in the outer regions only, since the seal radius ratio turned to the maximum constraint value being set in this paper, which is 0.8. The oil pressure distribution on the right hand side in the same figure shows pointed sharp pressure distribution. These peaks are the pressure where the groove part and seal part meet, a result of collisions between oil lubricant flow and seal.For the groove geometries with allowable film thickness ofha=3.0 μm and ha=4.0 μm shown in Figures 5(b) and 5(c), the inner part of the bearing possesses a larger portion of spiral groove geometries compared to that optimized with allowable film thickness of ha=2.0 μm. Even though the inner division creates comparatively smaller pressure peaks, this time the pressure is well distributed throughout the bearing surface.If we focus on the inner periphery of the total geometry closely, that is, the end part of inner spiral just before the seal, we can see that another bend with the opposite direction of the outer bends started to appear. These inner bends however are smaller than the outer ones. This can be explained by the fact that in order to maintain the prescribed allowable film thickness, it is essential to increase the pump in effect of the inner spiral. It is insufficient with only the inner spiral geometry and outer bends. Therefore, another bend in the inner periphery, just beside the seal, appears to increase the film thickness of the bearing. The inner bends can be seen clearly for the case of allowable film thickness ofha=4.0 μm. The combination of inner bends, outer bends, and inner spiral geometry helps to optimally balance the pressure and improve the dynamic stiffness.The details of groove geometry and dimension of the optimized bearings from Figure5 are shown in Table 3. As can be seen from the table, the values of geometry parameters changed from initial to a new groove geometry with slightly different angles of φ1 through φ4 depending on the allowable film thickness. However, in general all the groove geometry changes from spiral groove geometry to spiral with bends in the outer periphery.Table 3
Design variables of optimized bearings at 10,000 rpm.
Design variables
Optimizedha=2.0 µm
Optimizedha=3.0 µm
Optimizedha=4.0 µm
Angleφ1 (deg)
7.94
4.46
2.26
Angleφ2 (deg)
−20.7
−11.2
−4.70
Angleφ3 (deg)
79.9
68.1
61.3
Angleφ4 (deg)
17.5
26.4
32.3
Groove numberN
6
11
13
Seal ratiors
0.80
0.69
0.63
Groove depthhg (m)
5.0
×
10
-
6
7.5
×
10
-
6
8.8
×
10
-
6
Groove width ratioα
0.4
0.45
0.48The other design parameters of groove dimensions such as seal radius ratio, groove depth, and groove width ratio also change. The seal radius ratio shows that the lower the allowable film thickness is being set, the more the groove geometry surface will be occupied with the seal area. This eventually made the groove geometry to be concentrated at the outer region of the total bearing surface. On the other hand, for the groove depth and groove width ratio values, results show that the lower the allowable film thickness is being set, the smaller those values turned into.


### 4.2. Static and Dynamic Characteristics of Optimized Bearings

Figures6(a), 6(b), and 6(c) show the relations between the rotational speed and the optimized values of dynamic stiffness, K, minimum oil lubricating film thickness, hr, and friction torque, Tr, respectively. The solid lines, alternate long and short dashed lines, and short dashed lines with dots represent the optimized bearings for ha=2.0 μm, ha=3.0 μm, and ha=4.0 μm, respectively. The dots represent the characteristics values for each optimized bearing at that specific rotational speed. The short dashed lines without dots represent the initial spiral bearings.Bearing characteristics versus rotational speed; (a) dynamic stiffnessK, (b) minimum oil lubricating film thickness hr, (c) friction torque Tr.
(a)
(b)
(c)The objective function for this study is the improvement of the HDD spindle dynamic stiffness. As can be seen from Figure6(a), with the proposed optimization method, the dynamic stiffness values are improved compared to the values of conventional spiral bearings. The oil lubricated bearing for conventional spiral showed a trend of decreasing with the increase of rotational speed. However, optimized bearings still show an improvement where different rotational speed gives different stiffness characteristics but with all of them being improved and maintained compared to the conventional ones.Figure6(b) shows the relation of minimum oil lubricating film thickness for all optimized results with rotational speed. The minimum oil lubricating film thickness of conventional spiral shows an increase with rotational speed. However, compared to the initial spiral groove, the geometry of optimized bearings has a much lower film thickness. This means that the outer bends of optimized bearings have the ability to pull down the bearings towards bearing base. This is what contributes to the increase of the dynamic stiffnesses of the spindle. Moreover, the results obtained are attributable to the groove numbers as shown in Figure 5. Generally, the load carrying capacity W is increased with an increase in the groove numbers. Therefore, the oil lubricating film thickness is increased with an increase in the groove numbers because we set constant load Wd=0.185 (N) in this optimization. On the other hand, the dynamic stiffness is increased with a decrease in the film thickness as shown in Figure 6(a). Therefore, in this optimization, the minimum oil lubricating film thickness comes close to the allowable film thickness to drastically improve the dynamic stiffness changing the groove numbers of N=6, 11, 13 under the allowable film thickness of ha=2.0 μm, 3.0 μm, 4.0 μm.For the friction torque values shown in Figure6(c), all optimized bearings show slightly larger friction torque values compared to initial spiral groove. However, the increase of friction torque is small if we were to compare the dynamic stiffness improvement obtained using the proposed hybrid method.To confirm the effectiveness of the optimum design presented here, the values of design variables and objective function for the optimized bearing withha=3.0 μm are compared to those for randomly choosen design variables rotating at 10,000 rpm in Table 4. As shown in the table, the objective function of the optimized bearing shows maximum value compared with other values. Furthermore, we confirmed the values of the optimized bearing in the cases of changing allowable film thickness ha=2.0 μm, 4.0 μm to be the largest using the same method.Table 4
Comparison of the optimized solution and random solutions under allowable film thickness ofha=3.0×10-6 (m).
Case
Obj.f(X) (N/m)
φ
1 (deg)
φ
2 (deg)
φ
3 (deg)
φ
4 (deg)
N
r
s
h
g (m)
α
Optimum solution
1.89
×
10
6
4.46
−11.2
68.1
26.4
11
0.69
7.5
0
×
10
-
6
0.45
Random 1
2.91
×
10
5
−60.0
−105.7
−31.4
82.8
6
0.79
1.47
×
10
-
6
0.87
Random 2
2.04
×
10
5
−54.3
−37.1
159.9
162.8
9
0.44
7.90
×
10
-
6
0.79
Random 3
4.05
×
10
5
−131.4
−42.8
−125.7
57.1
11
0.4
1.20
×
10
-
5
0.66
Random 4
8.90
×
10
5
17.1
−5.7
−128.5
88.5
7
0.65
1.08
×
10
-
5
0.49
Random 5
1.02
×
10
6
−168.5
142.8
−97.1
−25.7
10
0.44
1.09
×
10
-
5
0.73
Random 6
4.25
×
10
5
20.0
17.1
−119.9
−105.7
11
0.68
1.09
×
10
-
5
0.5
Random 7
1.44
×
10
6
40.0
−60.0
74.2
−91.4
6
0.58
8.10
×
10
-
6
0.58
Random 8
4.85
×
10
5
77.1
62.8
−117.1
−14.3
12
0.64
1.25
×
10
-
5
0.72
Random 9
3.46
×
10
5
102.8
−42.8
−165.6
−122.8
6
0.71
1.21
×
10
-
5
0.41
Random 10
3.54
×
10
5
131.4
142.8
−142.8
−157.1
8
0.45
1.30
×
10
-
5
0.85


### 4.3. Results of Vibration Analysis

Figures7(a)–7(c) show the comparison of vibration characteristics for optimized bearings with ha=2.0 μm, ha=3.0 μm, ha=4.0 μm, and conventional spiral bearing rotating at 10,000 rpm.Vibration characteristics of optimized at 10,000 rpm bearings and conventional spiral bearing; (a) displacement with impulsive force, (b) gain versus frequency, and (c) phase angle versus frequency.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure7(a) shows the response of bearings towards impulsive force. The magnitude of the amplitude for impulsive force shows the highest value for conventional spiral groove bearings where a second order system wave response of an underdamped oscillatory response can be seen. On the other hand, the responses towards impulsive force for the rest of the bearings show smaller displacement values where a first order system of an overdamped wave form can be seen. This confirms that the optimized bearings have higher stability than the conventional spiral ones.Figures7(b) and 7(c) show the frequency response for the bearings. The optimized bearings have a smoother line of gain and phase angle. Gain shows that optimized 2.0 μm has the highest damping followed by 3.0 μm, 4.0 μm, and conventional spiral, respectively. This proves that the optimized bearings have better system responses.


## 4.1. Groove Geometry and Dimensions of Optimized Bearings

Figures5(a)–5(c) show the groove geometry and pressure distribution of optimized oil lubricated bearings at 10,000 rpm with allowable film thickness of 2.0 μm, 3.0 μm, and 4.0 μm, respectively.Groove geometry and pressure distribution of optimized oil lubricated bearings. (a) Optimized at 10,000 rpm,ha=2 μm, (b) optimized at 10,000 rpm, ha=3 μm, (c) optimized at 10,000 rpm, ha=4 μm.
(a)
(b)
(c)As can be seen from the figures, all geometries of the optimized bearings changed from initial spiral groove geometry to a new geometry, a spiral groove with bends in the outer periphery. In this paper, such geometry is called the modified spiral geometry.Generally, it is widely known that spiral groove geometry has the ability to elevate the film thickness with its pump in effects as the revolution increases due to pressure generation. This explanation is applicable for the inner periphery of the optimized groove geometry. As the bearing rotates, the oil lubricants flows inwards, starting from the outer bends periphery, and flows along the grooves and collides with the seal, hence generating pressure. From all of the pressure distribution figures, the point where the groove and seal meet has the highest point of pressure generated.However, the phenomenon is different from the outer periphery for opposite spiral groove geometries. Instead of generating the pressure and increasing the film thickness, the oil lubricant flows away from the outer bends towards the most outer radius of the bearing surface. Hence, as can be seen from the pressure distribution figures, there are no pressure peaks generated in the vicinity of the most outer regions of the bearing surface. This is because the pressure in the outer periphery of the bearing is neutralized to the atmospheric pressure. The pressure equivalent to the atmospheric pressure caused by the outer geometry bends will act as a force to pull down the bearing and lower the film thickness. With the combination of spiral geometry in the inner periphery and the opposite spiral bends in the outer periphery, the film thickness decreased, thus maximizing the dynamic stiffness of the spindle.Even though all groove geometries basically possess the modified spiral geometry, Figure5(a) shows that the region of spiral groove of optimized with ha=2.0 μm is smaller than those of optimized with ha=3.0 μm and ha=4.0 μm. The geometry is concentrated in the outer regions only, since the seal radius ratio turned to the maximum constraint value being set in this paper, which is 0.8. The oil pressure distribution on the right hand side in the same figure shows pointed sharp pressure distribution. These peaks are the pressure where the groove part and seal part meet, a result of collisions between oil lubricant flow and seal.For the groove geometries with allowable film thickness ofha=3.0 μm and ha=4.0 μm shown in Figures 5(b) and 5(c), the inner part of the bearing possesses a larger portion of spiral groove geometries compared to that optimized with allowable film thickness of ha=2.0 μm. Even though the inner division creates comparatively smaller pressure peaks, this time the pressure is well distributed throughout the bearing surface.If we focus on the inner periphery of the total geometry closely, that is, the end part of inner spiral just before the seal, we can see that another bend with the opposite direction of the outer bends started to appear. These inner bends however are smaller than the outer ones. This can be explained by the fact that in order to maintain the prescribed allowable film thickness, it is essential to increase the pump in effect of the inner spiral. It is insufficient with only the inner spiral geometry and outer bends. Therefore, another bend in the inner periphery, just beside the seal, appears to increase the film thickness of the bearing. The inner bends can be seen clearly for the case of allowable film thickness ofha=4.0 μm. The combination of inner bends, outer bends, and inner spiral geometry helps to optimally balance the pressure and improve the dynamic stiffness.The details of groove geometry and dimension of the optimized bearings from Figure5 are shown in Table 3. As can be seen from the table, the values of geometry parameters changed from initial to a new groove geometry with slightly different angles of φ1 through φ4 depending on the allowable film thickness. However, in general all the groove geometry changes from spiral groove geometry to spiral with bends in the outer periphery.Table 3
Design variables of optimized bearings at 10,000 rpm.
Design variables
Optimizedha=2.0 µm
Optimizedha=3.0 µm
Optimizedha=4.0 µm
Angleφ1 (deg)
7.94
4.46
2.26
Angleφ2 (deg)
−20.7
−11.2
−4.70
Angleφ3 (deg)
79.9
68.1
61.3
Angleφ4 (deg)
17.5
26.4
32.3
Groove numberN
6
11
13
Seal ratiors
0.80
0.69
0.63
Groove depthhg (m)
5.0
×
10
-
6
7.5
×
10
-
6
8.8
×
10
-
6
Groove width ratioα
0.4
0.45
0.48The other design parameters of groove dimensions such as seal radius ratio, groove depth, and groove width ratio also change. The seal radius ratio shows that the lower the allowable film thickness is being set, the more the groove geometry surface will be occupied with the seal area. This eventually made the groove geometry to be concentrated at the outer region of the total bearing surface. On the other hand, for the groove depth and groove width ratio values, results show that the lower the allowable film thickness is being set, the smaller those values turned into.


## 4.2. Static and Dynamic Characteristics of Optimized Bearings

Figures6(a), 6(b), and 6(c) show the relations between the rotational speed and the optimized values of dynamic stiffness, K, minimum oil lubricating film thickness, hr, and friction torque, Tr, respectively. The solid lines, alternate long and short dashed lines, and short dashed lines with dots represent the optimized bearings for ha=2.0 μm, ha=3.0 μm, and ha=4.0 μm, respectively. The dots represent the characteristics values for each optimized bearing at that specific rotational speed. The short dashed lines without dots represent the initial spiral bearings.Bearing characteristics versus rotational speed; (a) dynamic stiffnessK, (b) minimum oil lubricating film thickness hr, (c) friction torque Tr.
(a)
(b)
(c)The objective function for this study is the improvement of the HDD spindle dynamic stiffness. As can be seen from Figure6(a), with the proposed optimization method, the dynamic stiffness values are improved compared to the values of conventional spiral bearings. The oil lubricated bearing for conventional spiral showed a trend of decreasing with the increase of rotational speed. However, optimized bearings still show an improvement where different rotational speed gives different stiffness characteristics but with all of them being improved and maintained compared to the conventional ones.Figure6(b) shows the relation of minimum oil lubricating film thickness for all optimized results with rotational speed. The minimum oil lubricating film thickness of conventional spiral shows an increase with rotational speed. However, compared to the initial spiral groove, the geometry of optimized bearings has a much lower film thickness. This means that the outer bends of optimized bearings have the ability to pull down the bearings towards bearing base. This is what contributes to the increase of the dynamic stiffnesses of the spindle. Moreover, the results obtained are attributable to the groove numbers as shown in Figure 5. Generally, the load carrying capacity W is increased with an increase in the groove numbers. Therefore, the oil lubricating film thickness is increased with an increase in the groove numbers because we set constant load Wd=0.185 (N) in this optimization. On the other hand, the dynamic stiffness is increased with a decrease in the film thickness as shown in Figure 6(a). Therefore, in this optimization, the minimum oil lubricating film thickness comes close to the allowable film thickness to drastically improve the dynamic stiffness changing the groove numbers of N=6, 11, 13 under the allowable film thickness of ha=2.0 μm, 3.0 μm, 4.0 μm.For the friction torque values shown in Figure6(c), all optimized bearings show slightly larger friction torque values compared to initial spiral groove. However, the increase of friction torque is small if we were to compare the dynamic stiffness improvement obtained using the proposed hybrid method.To confirm the effectiveness of the optimum design presented here, the values of design variables and objective function for the optimized bearing withha=3.0 μm are compared to those for randomly choosen design variables rotating at 10,000 rpm in Table 4. As shown in the table, the objective function of the optimized bearing shows maximum value compared with other values. Furthermore, we confirmed the values of the optimized bearing in the cases of changing allowable film thickness ha=2.0 μm, 4.0 μm to be the largest using the same method.Table 4
Comparison of the optimized solution and random solutions under allowable film thickness ofha=3.0×10-6 (m).
Case
Obj.f(X) (N/m)
φ
1 (deg)
φ
2 (deg)
φ
3 (deg)
φ
4 (deg)
N
r
s
h
g (m)
α
Optimum solution
1.89
×
10
6
4.46
−11.2
68.1
26.4
11
0.69
7.5
0
×
10
-
6
0.45
Random 1
2.91
×
10
5
−60.0
−105.7
−31.4
82.8
6
0.79
1.47
×
10
-
6
0.87
Random 2
2.04
×
10
5
−54.3
−37.1
159.9
162.8
9
0.44
7.90
×
10
-
6
0.79
Random 3
4.05
×
10
5
−131.4
−42.8
−125.7
57.1
11
0.4
1.20
×
10
-
5
0.66
Random 4
8.90
×
10
5
17.1
−5.7
−128.5
88.5
7
0.65
1.08
×
10
-
5
0.49
Random 5
1.02
×
10
6
−168.5
142.8
−97.1
−25.7
10
0.44
1.09
×
10
-
5
0.73
Random 6
4.25
×
10
5
20.0
17.1
−119.9
−105.7
11
0.68
1.09
×
10
-
5
0.5
Random 7
1.44
×
10
6
40.0
−60.0
74.2
−91.4
6
0.58
8.10
×
10
-
6
0.58
Random 8
4.85
×
10
5
77.1
62.8
−117.1
−14.3
12
0.64
1.25
×
10
-
5
0.72
Random 9
3.46
×
10
5
102.8
−42.8
−165.6
−122.8
6
0.71
1.21
×
10
-
5
0.41
Random 10
3.54
×
10
5
131.4
142.8
−142.8
−157.1
8
0.45
1.30
×
10
-
5
0.85


## 4.3. Results of Vibration Analysis

Figures7(a)–7(c) show the comparison of vibration characteristics for optimized bearings with ha=2.0 μm, ha=3.0 μm, ha=4.0 μm, and conventional spiral bearing rotating at 10,000 rpm.Vibration characteristics of optimized at 10,000 rpm bearings and conventional spiral bearing; (a) displacement with impulsive force, (b) gain versus frequency, and (c) phase angle versus frequency.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure7(a) shows the response of bearings towards impulsive force. The magnitude of the amplitude for impulsive force shows the highest value for conventional spiral groove bearings where a second order system wave response of an underdamped oscillatory response can be seen. On the other hand, the responses towards impulsive force for the rest of the bearings show smaller displacement values where a first order system of an overdamped wave form can be seen. This confirms that the optimized bearings have higher stability than the conventional spiral ones.Figures7(b) and 7(c) show the frequency response for the bearings. The optimized bearings have a smoother line of gain and phase angle. Gain shows that optimized 2.0 μm has the highest damping followed by 3.0 μm, 4.0 μm, and conventional spiral, respectively. This proves that the optimized bearings have better system responses.


## 5. Conclusions

In this paper, the optimum design method for 2.5 inch HDD was carried out to improve the dynamic stiffness of a thrust bearing spindle. The results can be concluded as follows.(1)
Bearing characteristics using the proposed hybrid method showed that, compared with conventional spiral groove bearings, improvements of dynamic stiffnesses can be obtained when a new geometry of modified spiral groove geometry is introduced.(2)
To maximize the dynamic stiffness is to set the maximum seal radius ratio, that is, by concentrating the geometry at the most outer periphery of the bearing.(3)
Vibration analysis of optimized bearings showed better characteristics than the initial spiral bearings. Therefore, optimized bearings are expected to improve vibration characteristic of HDD.


## 6. Future Work

In this paper, we confirmed that dynamic stiffness of thrust bearing for 2.5 inch HDD was drastically improved numerically using the proposed hybrid method. However, it is necessary to verify the calculated data by experiments. We have prepared the experiments to verify the calculated data by using original experimental test rigs as shown in Figure8. Figures 8(a) and 8(b) show the impulse and vibration experimental test rigs, respectively. The response of bearings towards impulse force, which can be applied using see-saw mechanism as shown in Figure 8(a), can be measured. On the other hand, it is very difficult to measure the spring and damping coefficients of spindle motor for 2.5 inch HDD because the displacement of the bearing is very small. We proposed the identification method [11] of oil film coefficients of bearings for HDD spindle using the response waveform obtained by vibration experiment using the test rig as shown in Figure 8(b). As mentioned above, therefore, we plan to submit the further study including these contents.Experimental test rigs for verification of calculated data.
(a)
Vibration test rig
(b)
Impulse test rig



---

*Source: 896148-2013-12-31.xml*