# A Comprehensive Approach to Antioxidant Activity in the Seeds of Wild Legume Species of TribeFabeae

Authors: Elena Pastor-Cavada; Rocío Juan; Julio E. Pastor; Manuel Alaiz; Javier Vioque
Journal: Journal of Botany
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

The benefits of polyphenols have been widely demonstrated in recent decades. In order to find new species with a high biological functionality, the antioxidant activity of the polyphenol extracts from seeds of 50 taxa of tribeFabeae (Lathyrus,Lens,Pisum, andVicia) from Spain has been studied. Considering the average concentration obtained from the data in the four genera of theFabeae tribe,Pisum andLathyrus show the highest average polyphenol concentration. The highest specific antioxidant activity as well as the antioxidant activity coefficient was observed inPisum andVicia. However, with respect to the total antioxidant activity, the highest average value was observed inLathyrus andPisum. The results obtained reveal that many of the wild taxa examined could be potential source of antioxidants.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The polyphenols, including phenolic acids, flavonoids, lignans, and stilbenes, are an extensive group of secondary metabolites having in common a hydroxy-substituted benzene ring in their structure [1]. The legumes are especially rich in flavonoids [2]. A variety of biological functions have been proposed for polyphenols in plants, such as protection against radiation, oxidative damage, and diseases and participation in signalling pathways [3]. Polyphenols have been associated also with the health-promoting effects of consuming fruits and vegetables, and this positive effect has been related to their antioxidant activity [4]. These health-promoting properties include risk from cancer and cardiovascular and neurodegenerative disease [5–8].The legumes are used for human food, animal feed, and other commercial applications. They have a great world economic importance and play an important role in food nutrition especially in developing countries and the demand for them is expected to increase in the coming years [9].The tribeFabeae in Spain presents the generaVicia,Lens,Lathyrus, andPisum [10]. These plants, as other legumes, may grow under drought stress conditions and on poor soils due to their capacity to fix atmospheric nitrogen [11]. The polyphenols content and the antioxidative activity ofVicia faba L. [12, 13],V. sativa L. [14], or 28 wild species ofVicia [15] from Andalusia, Spain, have been studied. InLens there are some studies on polyphenols composition ofL. culinaris Medicus [13, 16]. With respect toLathyrus, studies on polyphenols, such asL. sativus L. [17, 18],L. maritimus Bigelow [19–21], or 15 wild species also from Andalusia [22] have been made. Although there is not too much information about the polyphenol profile in the tribeFabeae, Šibul et al. [23] examined herb and root extracts of seven legumes and 33 phenolic compounds were identified and quantified. High levels of genistein and daidzein (isoflavones), quercetin (flavonoids), and quinic acid, vanillic acid, and gallic acid (phenolic acids) were found.In the last decades a large amount of the world phytodiversity has been lost because local varieties and species have been substituted by commercial ones with a high yield and genetic uniformity. To recover and maintain this biodiversity, a diversification of plant species is necessary, and this can be achieved by increasing our knowledge of local species. The aim of the present research was to study and compare the polyphenol content and the antioxidant activity of the collected legume species of tribeFabeae from Southern Spain. These species show the variability of the tribe in the Mediterranean region, which includes both wild and cultivate taxa.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. General Experimental Procedures

(+)-Catechin,β-carotene, and linoleic acid are products of Sigma (Madrid, Spain). Tween 20 was purchased from VWR (Barcelona, Spain). They were used for the assays.


### 2.2. Plant Material

Fully matured seed samples were taken from wild populations located in Andalusia (Southern Spain). The seeds were collected from different fruits and specimens in a given population and stored at −20°C. Voucher specimens were deposited in the Herbarium of the University of Sevilla (SEV).


### 2.3. Phenolics Extraction and Quantification

Seeds were ground using a domestic blender and extracted (60 mg) with methanol (1 mL) by vortexing in Eppendorf tubes at maximum speed for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. The methanolic extracts were recovered by centrifugation at 11600 g for 15 min and stored in the dark at −20°C. The total phenolic content of methanolic extracts was determined according to Mazza et al. method [24]. The sample (10 μL) was mixed with a solution of 2% HCL in 75% ethanol (240 μL) in a 96-well microtiter plate. After 10 min, the absorbance of the solution was monitored at 280 nm to measure total phenolics. Catechin dissolved in methanol was used as a standard. Phenolic content was expressed as milligrams equivalent to catechin per gram of sample.


### 2.4. Antioxidant Activity

Antioxidant activity was estimated by determination of the peroxidative decomposition ofβ-carotene (bleaching) in the presence of linoleic acid and the samples as described by Marco modified method [25]. This method was successfully used by the authors before, where the complete protocol can be found [15, 22, 26].


### 2.5. Statistical Analysis

Results are expressed as the mean values ± standard deviation of several samples except for species with only one population. The data were statistically analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Means were compared by Scheffe’s test. TheK-means algorithm has been used to group the taxa studied [27]. Lastly, a discriminating analysis has been performed in order to verify whether the parameters used to sever the taxa are actually effective.


## 2.1. General Experimental Procedures

(+)-Catechin,β-carotene, and linoleic acid are products of Sigma (Madrid, Spain). Tween 20 was purchased from VWR (Barcelona, Spain). They were used for the assays.


## 2.2. Plant Material

Fully matured seed samples were taken from wild populations located in Andalusia (Southern Spain). The seeds were collected from different fruits and specimens in a given population and stored at −20°C. Voucher specimens were deposited in the Herbarium of the University of Sevilla (SEV).


## 2.3. Phenolics Extraction and Quantification

Seeds were ground using a domestic blender and extracted (60 mg) with methanol (1 mL) by vortexing in Eppendorf tubes at maximum speed for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. The methanolic extracts were recovered by centrifugation at 11600 g for 15 min and stored in the dark at −20°C. The total phenolic content of methanolic extracts was determined according to Mazza et al. method [24]. The sample (10 μL) was mixed with a solution of 2% HCL in 75% ethanol (240 μL) in a 96-well microtiter plate. After 10 min, the absorbance of the solution was monitored at 280 nm to measure total phenolics. Catechin dissolved in methanol was used as a standard. Phenolic content was expressed as milligrams equivalent to catechin per gram of sample.


## 2.4. Antioxidant Activity

Antioxidant activity was estimated by determination of the peroxidative decomposition ofβ-carotene (bleaching) in the presence of linoleic acid and the samples as described by Marco modified method [25]. This method was successfully used by the authors before, where the complete protocol can be found [15, 22, 26].


## 2.5. Statistical Analysis

Results are expressed as the mean values ± standard deviation of several samples except for species with only one population. The data were statistically analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Means were compared by Scheffe’s test. TheK-means algorithm has been used to group the taxa studied [27]. Lastly, a discriminating analysis has been performed in order to verify whether the parameters used to sever the taxa are actually effective.


## 3. Results and Discussion

The generaPisum andLens have shown the polyphenol contents similar to those observed inLathyrus andVicia genera [15, 22], respectively, (Table 1).Table 1
Phenolic contents (mg/g seed flour) and antioxidant activity of methanolic extracts (2μg catechin equivalents) from studied genera. Results are the average ± standard deviation of different populations. Superscript letters indicate significant differences between values in the same column (Scheffe’s test); P
∗
<
0.05 and  P
∗
∗
<
0.01.
∗Phenolic contents
AOX
DR
∗
∗AA
∗
∗ORR
∗AAC
Lathyrus
13.5
0.0034 ± 0.00
0.0087 ± 0.00
48.23 ± 9.38a
0.52 ± 0.09b
327.87 ± 92.16a
Lens
5.5
0.0152 ± 0.01
0.0107 ± 0.00
54.92 ± 9.25a
b
0.45 ± 0.09a
b
379.01 ± 90.23a
b
Pisum
16.7
0.0034
0.0082
65.53a
b
0.35a
b
488.4a
b
Vicia
6.0
0.0057 ± 0.01
0.0101 ± 0.00
57.37 ± 7.26b
0.43 ± 0.07a
403.81 ± 75.47b
AOX: antioxidant value; DR: degradation rate; AA: antioxidant activity; ORR: oxidation rate ratio; AAC: antioxidant activity coefficient.As in the case ofLathyrus andVicia genera [15, 22], the antioxidant activity of the polyphenol extracts inLens andPisum seeds has been studied using two experiments. In the first experiment, a quantity of polyphenol equivalent to 2 μg of catechin has been extracted, whereas, in the second experiment, the antioxidant activity of the polyphenols extracted was compared to a fixed quantity of flour (5 μL of polyphenol extract).Considering the average concentration obtained from the data in the four genera of theFabeae tribe [15, 22],Pisum andLathyrus are the genera which show the highest average polyphenol concentration; the latter genus (P
<
0.05) is clearly distinguished fromLens andVicia genera (Table 1).Nevertheless, as stated above, a high polyphenol concentration does not mean that the specific antioxidant activity is also high, although it can help to obtain an adequate total antioxidant activity from the species itself.As revealed in Table1, the highest average value is observed in the specific antioxidant activity inPisum andVicia, even though onlyVicia andLathyrus (P
<
0.01) are distinguished, as with the antioxidant activity coefficient (P
<
0.05). However, the value of the antioxidant activity and degradation rate are similar in the four genera studied, although the range of the degradation rate has been significantly higher (P
<
0.01) inLathyrus as compared toVicia (Table 1).With respect to the total antioxidant activity,Lathyrusgenus stands out with a significantly higher average value (P
<
0.05) thanVicia (Table 2). The highest antioxidant activity coefficient was observed inPisum andLathyrus, even though onlyLathyrus andVicia (P
<
0.001) are distinguished (Table 2). On the other hand,Lathyrus andPisum are the genera with the lowest range of degradation rate and antioxidant value, although the latter genus does not reveal a significant difference.Table 2
Antioxidant activity of phenols extracted from studied genera per gram of seed flour extracted (5μL). Results are the average ± standard deviation of different populations. Superscript letters indicate significant differences between values in the same column (Scheffe’s test; P
∗
<
0.05 and P
∗
∗
∗
<
0.001).
∗AOX
DR
∗AA
∗ORR
∗
∗
∗AAC
Lathyrus
0.0029 ± 0.00a
0.0075 ± 0.00
57.56 ± 5.30b
0.42 ± 0.05a
468.64 ± 62.97b
Lens
0.0044 ± 0.00b
0.0117 ± 0.00
46.99 ± 19.43a
b
0.53 ± 0.19a
b
332.59 ± 165.34a
b
Pisum
0.0029a
b
0.0076
65.52a
b
0.34a
b
513.87a
b
Vicia
0.0045 ± 0.00b
0.0191 ± 0.03
46.66 ± 10.52a
0.53 ± 0.10b
317.57 ± 98.85a
AOX: antioxidant value; DR: degradation rate; AA: antioxidant activity; ORR: oxidation rate ratio; AAC: antioxidant activity coefficient.InLathyrus, how its high content of phenols compensates its low average specific antioxidant activity can be observed, making the total antioxidant activity higher thanLens orVicia which showed polyphenols with a higher specific antioxidant activity (Tables 1 and 2).In spite of the results obtained at a genus level, the heterogeneity observed, especially inLathyrus andVicia, requires the 50 taxa of theFabeae tribe to be analyzed jointly, regardless of the genus. Thus, considering both polyphenol content and all the results obtained from specific and total antioxidant activity, taxa have been grouped using all parameters simultaneously. Therefore, K-means algorithm severs the taxa into four clearly distinguished groups (Table 3).Table 3
Groups of taxa studied established in relation to their phenolic contents and antioxidant activity (Experiments1 and 2).
Taxa
Group 1
Lathyrus angulatus
L. hirsutus
L. tingitanus
L. aphaca
L. pratensis
Vicia sativasubsp. sativa
L. filiformis
L. sphaericus
Group 2
Lathyrus amphicarpos
L. setifolius
V. glaucasubsp.giennensis
L. annuus
Lens lamottei
V. hirsuta
L. cicera
Lens nigricans
V. luteasubsp. cavanillesii
L. clymenum
Pisum sativumsubsp. elatius
V. onobrychioides
L. latifolius
Vicia angustifolia
V. pubescens
L. ochrus
V. cordata
V. pyrenaica
L. sativus
V. ervilia
Group 3
Vicia benghalensis
V. incana
V. parviflora
V. dasycarpa
V. lathyroides
V. peregrina
V. disperma
V. monanthasubsp. calcarata
V. tenuifolia
Group 4
Lens culinaris
V. hybrida
V. monardi
Vicia altissima
V. luteasubsp.luteavar.hirta
V. narbonensis
V. articulata
V. luteasubsp. luteavar.lutea
V. pseudocracca
V. eriocarpa
V. luteasubsp. vestita
V. vicioides
Vicia fabaIn order to verify that the parameters used to sever taxa are effective, a discriminating analysis has been performed which uses, apart from the polyphenol content, all the values obtained from both specific antioxidant activity (Experiment 1) and total antioxidant activity (Experiment 2). Table4 shows an overview of this analysis in which the three discriminating functions are statistically relevant (P
<
0.001). The groups are fairly well distinguished. OnlyL. hirsutus L. (Group 1) andL. amphicarpos L. (Group 2) share an intermediate position between both groups (Figure 1).Table 4
Summary of discriminant analysis based on the phenolic contents and antioxidant activity (Experiments1 and 2).
Functions
Wilks Lambda
Chi-square
Df
P value
Cumulative percentage
1
0.0197511
162.8687
33
0.0000
77.22
2
0.196516
67.5211
20
0.0000
93.30
3
0.562703
23.8627
9
0.0045
100Figure 1
Distribution in groups of taxa studied according to discriminant analysis.Table5 shows that the taxa included in Group 1 have a significantly higher phenol concentration (P
<
0.05). When comparing these results to the polyphenol contents in the seeds of different cultivated species (lupins, soya beans, and chickpeas), it can be observed that the taxa inFabeae tribe included in Group 2 reveal a similar concentration to these cultivated species, whereas the taxa in Group 1 have a significantly higher polyphenol quantity (Figure 2).Table 5
Phenolic contents (mg/g seed flour) and antioxidant activity of methanolic extracts (2μg catechin equivalents) for the four groups of taxa belong to tribe Fabeae from Southern Spain. Results are the average ± standard deviation. Superscript letters indicate significant differences between values in the same row (Scheffe’s test; P
∗
<
0.05 and P
∗
∗
∗
<
0.001).
Group 1
Group 2
Group 3
Group 4
∗Phenolic contents
21.8 ± 6.5c
7.9 ± 3.1b
3.3 ± 0.8a
4.6 ± 2.0a
b
AOXa
0.0040 ± 0.00
0.0054 ± 0.00
0.0082 ± 0.01
0.0050 ± 0.00
∗
∗
∗DRb
0.010 ± 0.00a
b
0.009 ± 0.00a
0.08 ± 0.00a
0.011 ± 0.00b
∗AAc
42.59 ± 9.17a
56.56 ± 5.12b
65.34 ± 3.62c
51.71 ± 5.65b
∗ORRd
0.574 ± 0.09c
0.435 ± 0.05b
0.347 ± 0.04a
0.482 ± 0.06b
∗AACe
267.11 ± 78.8a
400.9 ± 51.9b
489.50 ± 41.2c
346.28 ± 53.6b
AOX: antioxidant value; DR: degradation rate; AA: antioxidant activity; ORR: oxidation rate ratio; AAC: antioxidant activity coefficient.Figure 2
Seed phenolic contents for the four groups of taxa belong to tribeFabeae from Southern Spain and chickpea, lupin, and soy.With respect to the activity of these polyphenols (Tables5 and 6), most values related to both specific and total antioxidant activity show relevant differences between the groups. Only the specific antioxidant score (AOX) (Table 3) and the total degradation rate (DR) (Table 6) are similar for all four groups of taxa.Table 6
Antioxidant activity of phenols extracted for the four groups of taxa belong to tribeFabeae from Southern Spain per gram of seed flour extracted (5 μL). Results are the average ± standard deviation of different populations. Superscript letters indicate significant differences between values in the same row (Scheffe’s test; P
∗
<
0.05 and P
∗
∗
∗
<
0.001).
Group 1
Group 2
Group 3
Group 4
AOXa
0.0028 ± 0.00a
0.0034 ± 0.00a
0.0045 ± 0.00b
0.0053 ± 0.00c
∗
∗
∗DRb
0.072 ± 0.00
0.009 ± 0.00
0.025 ± 0.04
0.023 ± 0.03
∗AAc
60.06 ± 8.4c
56.81 ± 4.5c
46.91 ± 6.3b
36.73 ± 7.2a
∗ORRd
0.399 ± 0.08a
0.433 ± 0.05a
0.532 ± 0.06b
0.633 ± 0.07c
∗AACe
490.61 ± 92.2c
431.59 ± 55.1c
315.82 ± 59.7b
229.74 ± 57.3a
AOX: antioxidant value; DR: degradation rate; AA: antioxidant activity; ORR: oxidation rate ratio; AAC: antioxidant activity coefficient.Groups 1 and 2 share the same total antioxidant activity coefficient, being the highest score, which makes a clear difference (P
<
0.05) with Groups 3 and 4 (Table 6). Nevertheless, the polyphenol content in both groups is remarkably different (P
<
0.05), as well as the specific antioxidant activity or specific antioxidant activity coefficient (Table 5). As a result, the total antioxidant activity and the total antioxidant activity coefficient are similar in the two groups (Table 6).Therefore, when the 50 taxa are analyzed jointly, the negative correlation that was observed between both parameters is maintained, although tightly (R
2 = 34.64, Figure 3).Figure 3
Correlation between phenolic contents (mg/g seed flour) and antioxidant activity coefficient in studied genera.


## 4. Conclusions

Results obtained reveal that many of the taxa examined could be potential sources of antioxidants, especially the ones belonging to Groups 1 and 2 (Table3 and Figure 1). Both groups include species that are currently cultivated or have been cultivated in the past, although a great deal of them have never been used in crops and could become alternative sources of antioxidants.



---

*Source: 8926765-2016-04-07.xml*