# Stepped Frequency Pulse Frequency Diverse Array Radar for Target Localization in Angle and Range Domains

Authors: Ming Tan; Chun-yang Wang; Zhi-hui Li; Xin Li; Lei Bao
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

Unlike phased array bringing angle-dependent and range-independent beamforming, a new kind of radar system called frequency diverse array (FDA) has been widely used for its ability to generate angle-range-dependent beampattern, which provides a broad prospect of radar application. Nevertheless, FDA beampattern is coupling in the angle and range responses, which results in the difficulty for FDA to differentiate the target in two domains simultaneously. In this paper, a stepped frequency pulse FDA (SFP-FDA) radar is proposed to wipe off the angle-range coupling in FDA and improve the target’s angle and range localization accuracy. Compared to the double-pulse FDA, the proposed system can achieve a better performance in range resolution and multitarget identification. The Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB) is derived and used to analyze the performance of the proposed system and double-pulse FDA radar. Numerical results are implemented to verify the validity of the proposed scheme.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Target localization is to find a way to calculate the position parameters of the target, and the angle and range parameters do draw much attention in localization [1]. The phased array radar [2, 3] has been widely employed for its capability to orientate the direction of the target [4, 5]. Due to its range ambiguity [6], phased array radar cannot distinguish targets from different ranges in a particular angle. To address the current needs for controlling range-dependent transmit energy distribution, a more agile array radar called frequency diverse array (FDA) radar is put forward by Antonik et al. [7–9]. By using a tiny frequency offset among antenna elements, FDA can achieve an angle-range-dependent beamforming [10]. The degree of freedom is increased, and this bidimensional property can be widely utilized, such as interference rejection [11], moving target indication [12], range ambiguity resolution, and target localization [13, 14].Because of its wide application prospects, FDA has attracted extensive attention in recent years [15–18]. A technology for FDA antenna systems that could generate angle-range-dependent beamforming is put forward in [19]. The multipath features of FDA on the ground propagation are studied in [20]. The Cramér-Rao lower bounds (CRLBs) of FDA for estimating range, angle, and velocity are derived in [21]. Some researchers are trying to find a transmit beampattern, which can last for a period of time in focusing signal power on the expected location [22]. A FDA structure based on periodic triangular frequency-modulated continuous waveform is put forward in [23]. To realize low probability of intercept, the cognitive FDA MIMO radar is presented in [24]. Global optimization algorithm like genetic algorithm is discussed to generate a thumbtack-shaped beampattern [25]. A multicarrier nonlinear frequency modulation FDA system based on pseudorandom frequency offset is presented in [26]. The system is simplified by omitting the optimization algorithm, and signal power can focus on different targets during desired time period. To attain a required radiation performance, such as the element placements and frequency offsets, the sparse FDA technology based on artificial bee colony optimizer is proposed in [27]. A new beampattern synthesis method for FDA radar is presented in [28], which incorporating an arc-tangent function-modulated frequency scheme.The target angles and ranges are jointly estimated by the MUSIC method in [29]. A multitarget localization algorithm, which incorporating the coprime arrays and the coprime frequency increments for the sparse FDA radar, is proposed in [14]. To realize unambiguous frequency pattern identification, a simple criterion derived by an eigenvector-based method for target localization is presented in [30]. Unlike [14, 29, 30], a concept of double-pulse FDA radar with frequency increments being zero and nonzero is presented in [31] to achieve the target localization. Two steps are needed in this method to estimate the angle and range, respectively. In the first step, a zero frequency increment FDA, i.e., phased array, is utilized to estimate the target in the angle dimension. Then, the angle information is used as the prior knowledge and the range of the target is localized by another pulse with nonzero frequency increment.In this paper, we propose a FDA transmit scheme called stepped frequency pulse FDA (SFP-FDA). In the proposed scheme, the SFP-FDA radar, like FDA radar, radiating a signal with a bit of frequency increment between the array elements in the first pulse, the difference is that there is another frequency interval between adjacent pulses. Due to the angle and range coupling of the beampattern, both the two dimensions of target cannot be estimated by FDA radar directly. Hence, the double-pulse FDA [31] which aims at angle-range localization of targets is proposed. The proposed system in this paper can be regarded as a kind of transformation or upgrading of [31], taking part of the amount of computation as a cost. It performs better in range resolution and multitarget localization. The data model and beamforming principle have been derived. The CRLB estimation of the proposed radar and the double-pulse radar are derived and simulated. And their performances are compared and analyzed.The remaining sections are organized as follows. Section2 gives some important details about FDA radar and phased array radar. Section 3 presents the mathematical principle and design technique of SFP-FDA radar. The SFP-FDA radar’s data model and the details of the targets’ localization in angle and range domains are proposed in Section 4. Section 5 derives the CRLB estimation performance. Next, Section 6 provides the numerical results and discussions. Finally, the conclusion is drawn in Section 7.


## 2. Frequency Diverse Array and Phased Array Radar

Consider the case where the frequency fed tonth element of an N element uniform linear array is [7–10].
(1)fn=f0+nΔfan=0,1,…,N−1,where f0 and Δfa are the signal operating frequency and the frequency interval between adjacent elements, respectively. The element spacing denoted as d which is taken as
(2)d=λ02=c2f0,where c is the velocity of light and λ0 is the wavelength with respect to the operating frequency f0. The geometry of FDA is illustrated in Figure 1.Figure 1
Geometry of FDA.The signal radiated by thenth element can be expressed as
(3)xnt=ane−j2πfnt,where an is the complex weight related to nth transmitted signal. Total electric field observed by a point target Pθ,r from far field can be written as
(4)xt,θ,r=∑n=0N−1xnt−Rnc=∑n=0N−1ane−j2πfnt−Rn/c,where Rn is the distance between target and nth element; it can be given as Rn=r−ndsinθ, where θ and r=R0 are the angle and range of the target, respectively.The phase ofnth signal is
(5)ϕnt=−2πfnt+2πfncRn.In comparison with the reference andnth signal, the phase difference can be given as
(6)Δϕnt=ϕnt−ϕ0t=−2πnΔfat−rΔfac+f0dsinθc+nΔfadsinθc.The array factor is not just affected by the angleθ, the range r, and frequency increment Δfa but also plays an important role. Since ndsinθ≪r and Δfa≪f0, the 4th term of (6) is small and ignorable. So, (6) becomes
(7)Δϕnt=−2πnΔfat−rΔfac+f0dsinθc.After rearranging terms, (4) can be expressed as
(8)xt,θ,r=e−j2πf0t−r/c∑n=0N−1ane−j2πnΔfat−rΔfa/c+f0dsinθ/c.The steering vector can be given as(9)αt,θ,r=1e−j2πΔfat+f0dsinθ/c−rΔfa/c⋯e−j2πN−1Δfat+f0dsinθ/c−rΔfa/cT,where ·T is the transpose operator. Define the element weighting vector as w=a0a1⋯aN−1T. In beamspace design sense, the common factor exp−j2πf0t−r/c can also be ignored in the discussion; (8) simplifies to
(10)xt,θ,r=wHα,where ·H is the conjugate transpose operator. Consider the case that a0=a1=⋯=aN−1=1, the transmit beampattern is given by
(11)Bt,θ,r=xt,θ,r=sinNπΔfat+f0dsinθ/c−rΔfa/csinπΔfat+f0dsinθ/c−rΔfa/c,which is the beampattern of FDA radar. Note that if Δf=0, the beampattern becomes
(12)Bθ=sinNπf0dsinθ/csinπf0dsinθ/c,which is only angle dependent just like conventional phased array radar.


## 3. Mathematical Principle and Design Technique of SFP-FDA Radar

Consider anN element FDA, the frequency transmitted on the nth element in the first pulse of SFP-FDA radar is the same as that of FDA radar, and the frequency of the waveform radiated from each element is incremented by a small amount from pulse to pulse. As shown in Figure 2, the frequency in the mth pulse of the nth element can be given as
(13)fnm=f0+nΔfa+mΔftm=0,1,…,M−1,where Δft is the frequency interval between adjacent pulses, and M is the number of the transmit pulses.Figure 2
Frequency increment versus time in thenth element.Adopting the signal of thenth element, the electric field observed by Pθ,r can be taken as
(14)xnt,r=∑m=0M−1anmRnexp−j2πfnmt−mTp−Rnc,where Tp is the pulse width, and anm is the complex weight of mth pulse associated with nth transmitted signal. Substituting Rn=r−ndsinθ and (13) into (14) yields
(15)xnt,r=∑m=0M−1anmr−ndsinθexp−j2πf0+nΔfa+mΔftt−mTp−r−ndsinθc.AssumingΔfa≪1/Tp and Δft≪1/Tp, then let Tp satisfied with f0Tp=integer. Due to the fact that expjx is a periodic function with a period of 2π, so exp−j2πf0+nΔfa+mΔftmTp≈exp−j2π×0 can be approximately obtained. Furthermore, in the sense of amplitude, we can utilize Rn≈r as approximation. Then, (15) can be equivalently reformulated as
(16)xnt,θ,r=1r∑m=0M−1anmexp−j2πf0+nΔfa+mΔftt−r−ndsinθc=expjϕ0r∑m=0M−1anmexp−j2πnΔfat+mΔftt−nΔfarc−mΔftrc+f0ndsinθc+n2Δfadsinθc+mnΔftdsinθc,where ϕ0=−2πf0t−r/c. Similarly, ndsinθ≪r and Δfa≪f0; also, we assumed that Δft≪f0, and then the terms n2Δfadsinθ/c and mnΔftdsinθ/c are small and can be ignored. The common factor expjϕ0/r can also be ignored in the sense of beamspace design. And the corresponding transmit beampattern can be written as
(17)At,θ,r=∑n=0N−1xnt,θ,r=∑n=0N−1∑m=0M−1anmexp−j2πnΔfat−nΔfarc+f0ndsinθcexp−j2πmΔftt−mΔftrc.Provided that the weights of signals’ pulses with the same order number in each element are equal. Andwt and wa are defined as the signal weighting vector and the element weighting vector, respectively. Taking ⊗ as the Kronecker product operator, (17) can be rewritten as
(18)At,θ,r=waHαat,θ,rwtHαtt,r=wHαat,θ,r⊗αtt,r=wHαt,θ,r,where αt,θ,r=αat,θ,r⊗αtt,r and
(19)αat,θ,r=1⋯exp−j2πN−1Δfat−Δfarc+f0dsinθcT,αtt,r=1⋯exp−j2πM−1Δftt−ΔftrcT,w=wa⊗wt=w00⋯w0,M−1⋯wnm⋯wN−1,M−1T.This implies that by optimizingwa and wt, the transmit beampattern can be schemed out.Consider the case thata00=a01=⋯=aN−1,M−1=1, the beampattern (17) is then shown to be
(20)At,θ,r=∑n=0N−1exp−j2πnΔfat−nΔfarc+f0ndsinθc∑m=0M−1exp−j2πmΔftt−mΔftrc=AF1t,θ,r⋅AF2t,r,where
(21)AF1t,θ,r=sinNπΔfat−Δfar/c+f0dsinθ/csinπΔfat−Δfar/c+f0dsinθ/c,AF2t,r=sinMπΔftt−Δftr/csinπΔftt−Δftr/c.Note that whenΔft=0, we can get At,θ,r=AF1t,θ,r, that is, the expression of the conventional FDA. And if Δfa=Δft=0, (20) is equivalent to (12). Therefore, the phased array radar and FDA radar can be regarded as two special forms of SFP-FDA. Assume that θ0=0, r0=0, and t0=1/Δfa,Δft, where Δfa,Δft is the greatest common divisor (GCD) of Δfa and Δft. For a given range and time, namely, r=r0 and t=t0, we then have AF2t,r=1; (20) will be equivalent to conventional FDA. Under these circumstances, both the FDA radar and the SFP-FDA radar have the same expression; hence, they possess the same angle resolution. According to [32, 33], the function Gx can be defined as
(22)Gx=sinNπxsinπx.Its 3 dB resolution can be calculated as(23)sinNπx0.5sinπx0.52=0.5,Nπx0.5=1.392,xmb=2x0.5.To calculate the range resolution, (11) can be simplified to
(24)Bt0,θ0,r=sinNπrΔfa/csinπrΔfa/c.Then, the 3 dB range resolution of FDA can be given as(25)rFDA=2.784cπNΔfa.Similarly, (20) can be simplified to
(26)At0,θ0,r=sinNπΔfar/csinπΔfar/c⋅sinMπΔftr/csinπΔftr/c.Assuming thatM=δ1N and Δft=δ2Δfa, (26) can be equivalently reformulated as
(27)At0,θ0,r=sinNπxsinπx⋅sinδ1Nπδ2xsinπδ2x,where x=Δfar/c. Taking δ1=1 and δ2=1 as an example, assuming u=Nπx, we can plot Figure 3.Figure 3
Function value diagram: (a)sinu/u and (b) sinu/usinδ1δ2u/δ1δ2uδ1=δ2=1.
(a)
(b)Then, the 3 dB range resolution of SFP-FDA can be given as(28)rSFP‐FDA=2.004cπNΔfa.The range resolution depends onM, N, Δft, and Δfa. The second factor of (26) is satisfied with
(29)sinMπΔftr/cMsinπΔftr/c≤1.Then, we will haveuSFP‐FDA<uFDA, where uSFP‐FDA and uFDA are the values of u when Y=0.7071 (Figure 3) in SFP-FDA and FDA, respectively; we can also obtain identical conclusion by comparing (25) and (28). Therefore, SFP-FDA outperforms FDA in range resolution.


## 4. Target Localization in Angle-Range Dimensions

Consider the SFP-FDA withN elements and M pulses, the transmitted signal can be expressed as
(30)xt,θ,r=∑n=0N−1wnHαnθ,rsnt.The reflected signal is formed as a result of delay and attenuation of the transmitted signal.(31)xrt,θ,r=σθ,r∑n=0N−1wnHαnθ,re−jΔnθ,rst,where σθ,r is the complex reflection amplitudes from the target in θ,r; wn and αn are the signal weighting vector and transmit steering vector of nth array element, respectively. Δnθ,r is the propagation delay in nth array element. st is the baseband waveform. We assumed
(32)grt,θ,r=∑n=0N−1wnHαnθ,re−jΔnθ,r.The demodulated baseband received signal can be written as(33)y=σθ,rgrt,θ,r⊗vt,θ,r+n,where vt,θ,r and n are the received steering vector and normalized Gaussian noise vector, respectively. The steering vector of transmit-receive can be written as
(34)ut,θ,r=grt,θ,r⊗vt,θ,r.The traditional nonadaptive receive beamforming is used, i.e., the weighting vectorwR=ut0,θs,rs, where θs and rs denote the far field target’s angle and range, respectively. The received beampattern can be given as [34]
(35)Bθ,r=wrHut0,θ,r2wrHut0,θs,rs2=uHt0,θs,rsut0,θ,r2ut0,θs,rs4.Note that if there are multiple targets such as three targets with the coordinates beingθs1,rs1, θs2,rs2, and θs3,rs3, the weighting vector will change to
(36)wR=ut0,θs1,rs1+ut0,θs2,rs2+ut0,θs3,rs3.According to analysis of Section3 and Section 4, the data model of received signal can be written as
(37)yl=σ0uθs,rs+n,where uθs,rs=αt0,θs,rs, and σ0 is the complex amplitudes.For a nonadaptive beamformer, the weighting vectorwR=uθs,rs and the angle and range of the target can be estimated as
(38)θ⌢s=argmaxθswRHyl2r⌢s=argmaxrswRHyl2.Owing to the decoupling transmit beampattern of the SFP-FDA radar, the angle and range of the target can be simultaneously estimated by utilizing only one step.


## 5. Performance Analysis

An analytical comparison of the performance of the proposed system and the double-pulse FDA radar in terms of CRLB is conducted; we rewrite (37) as
(39)yp=SNR⋅urθs,rs+n,where urθs,rs and SNR are the equivalent receiver steering vector and the signal to noise ratio, respectively. And the mean and variance of n are zero and I. urθs,rs=uSFP‐FDAθs,rs and urθs,rs=uFDAθs,rs are defined under the circumstances of SFP-FDA radar and the double-pulse FDA radar, respectively. A closed-form CRLB can be deducted approximately by arranging the steering vectors.
(40)uSFP‐FDAθs,rs=uθs,rsω0,…,uθs,rsωM−1T≈e−jω00,…,e−jω0N−1,…,e−jωM−10,…,e−jωM−1N−1T.On the other hand,(41)uFDAθs,rs=uθs,rsω00,uθs,rsω0T≈e−jω000,…,e−jω00N−1,e−jω00,…,e−jω0N−1T,where
(42)ω00n=n2πf0dsinθsc,ω0n=n2πf0+Δfadsinθsc−n2πΔfarsc,ω1n=n2πf0+Δfa+Δftdsinθsc−n2πΔfarsc−2πΔftrsc,⋮ωM−1n=n2πf0+Δfa+M−1Δftdsinθsc−n2πΔfarsc−M−12πΔftrsc.The meanμ and covariance Γ of yp can be respectively expressed as
(43)μ=urθs,rsSNR,Γ=I.The Fisher information matrix (FIM) can be obtained by [35].
(44)J=2Redμ∗dηΓ−1dμdηT,where
(45)η=θs,rsT.Then, the FIM of SFP-FDA can be written as(46)JSFP‐FDA=2⋅SNR⋅∑m=0M−1∑n=0N−1km2n∑m=0M−1∑n=0N−1kmn⋅ξmn∑m=0M−1∑n=0N−1kmn⋅ξmn∑m=0M−1∑n=0N−1ξm2n,where
(47)k0n=n2πf0+Δfadcosθsc,k1n=n2πf0+Δfa+Δftdcosθsc,⋮kM−1n=n2πf0+Δfa+M−1Δftdcosθsc,ξ0n=−n2πΔfarsc,ξ1n=−n2πΔfarsc−2πΔftrsc,⋮ξM−1n=−n2πΔfarsc−M−12πΔftrsc.By calculating the inverse matrix of FIM, the CRLB for the target’s estimation in angle and range domains can be obtained as(48)CRLBθs=JSFP‐FDA−11,1,CRLBrs=JSFP‐FDA−12,2,where ⋅i,j represents the element in the ith row and jth column of the matrix. The performance comparison of the two radars is presented in simulations.


## 6. Numerical Results

Consider a linear array of 16 elements with interelement spacingd=0.5λ0. The carrier frequency is f0=6GHz, whereas the frequency interval between adjacent elements and pulses is Δfa=Δft=3kHz. The number of pulses is M=16, and pulse width is Tp=2μs. The additive noise is modeled as complex Gaussian zero-mean spatially and temporally white random sequences with identical variance at each antenna element.


### 6.1. One Target

In the first part of this section, suppose that the target of interest is located in the angleθs1=0° and the slant range rs1=50km. The comparative target responses of the FDA radar and SFP-FDA are shown in Figure 4. In the FDA radar, owing to the angle-range coupling, the target cannot be localized effectively in both domains. Using the double-pulse FDA approach proposed in [31], the target angle can be estimated to be θ⌢s=0° by using the first pulse which can be seen as phased array, and then the target range can be estimated to be r⌢s=50km by taking advantage of the second pulse with FDA, as shown in Figure 5. Similarly, using the method mentioned in Section 4, as shown in Figure 6, we can localize the target in angle-range dimensions as 0°,50km. Note that the pulse number M, the element number N, and the frequency increments Δft and Δfa all affect the range resolution.Figure 4
Comparative target response: (a) FDA radar and (b) SFP-FDA radar.
(a)
(b)Figure 5
Target response by double-pulse FDA radar: (a) the first step and (b) the second step.
(a)
(b)Figure 6
Target response by SFP-FDA radar: (a) the angle profile and (b) the range profile.
(a)
(b)While compared with the double-pulse FDA radar, our proposed scheme has lower sidelobe and more concentrated energy in the mainlobe area. Besides, different from FDA radar, SFP-FDA radar has a range-angle decoupling beampattern.SFP-FDA radar can estimate the coordinates of target by only one step, whereas the double-pulse FDA radar demands two steps.By comparing Figure5 with Figure 6, it can be observed that, despite the equal angle response of both the radars, the SFP-FDA outperforms the FDA in the range profile, i.e., the former has a narrower mainlobe and much lower sidelobe.Then, we plotted Figure7, which compared the 3 dB resolution performance of FDA and SFP-FDA. Clearly, the advantage of SFP-FDA in range dimension can be observed, which is consistent with the theoretical analysis in Section 3.Figure 7
Comparative 3 dB resolution of FDA and SFP-FDA.


### 6.2. Two Targets with Different Angle and Different Range

Assuming that the two targets are located in coordinatesθs1,rs1=0°,50km and θs2,rs2=30°,60km. Figure 8 gives the target response of FDA radar and SFP-FDA radar. Since the two targets have different angle, it can be noticed that due to the angle-range coupling, it is very difficult to separate the peaks in both angle and range domains from the FDA beamformer output.Figure 8
Comparative target response of two targets: (a) FDA radar and (b) SFP-FDA radar.
(a)
(b)By utilizing the first step of the double-pulse FDA radar, the angle of the targets can be received, namely,0° and 30°. But when the second step is carried out, there are two peaks in each angle, as shown in Figure 9; thus, four targets have been obtained, and we cannot distinguish which ones are the real ones. The four targets can then be localized in angle-range dimensions as 0°,50km, 0°,35km, 30°,60km, and 30°,75km. Furthermore, by this means, we cannot accurately identify whether there are 2 targets, 3 targets, or even 4 targets.Figure 9
Range response of double-pulse FDA in the second processing step: (a)θs1=0° and (b) θs2=30°.
(a)
(b)Figures10 and 11 give the target response of SFP-FDA radar, the two targets can be directly identified both in the angle and range dimensions, and then they can be localized in 0°,50km and 30°,60km.Figure 10
The first target response: (a) the angle profile and (b) the range profile.
(a)
(b)Figure 11
The second target response: (a) the angle profile and (b) the range profile.
(a)
(b)It is evident that the two targets can be easily distinguished by the proposed scheme, which demonstrates the effectiveness of the SFP-FDA radar in resolving multiple targets. This simulation example shows that the SFP-FDA radar achieves better performance than the double-pulse FDA radar.


### 6.3. Estimation Performance

In this subsection, as compared to the double-pulse FDA radar, we simulated the performance of the proposed angle-range localization approach in terms of CRLB. Figure12 shows the comparative performance of localization as a function of the SNR between the proposed scheme and the double-pulse FDA radar.Figure 12
Comparative performance of range-angle localization: (a) the angle domain and (b) the range domain.
(a)
(b)Figures12(a) and 12(b) show the CRLB in the angle and range domain, respectively. It can be seen that the SFP-FDA radar can achieve a better estimation performance in both angle and range dimension, even when the number of its pulses is the same as that of the double-pulse FDA radar, that is, when M=2. Moreover, it is evident that the performance of both in the angle and range domains is improved as the SNR and the number of pulses increase. As shown in Figure 12, the SFP-FDA with M=16 performs better than the SFP-FDA with M=2. It is clear that the SFP-FDA radar achieves better estimation performance at the cost of much higher computation complexity.


## 6.1. One Target

In the first part of this section, suppose that the target of interest is located in the angleθs1=0° and the slant range rs1=50km. The comparative target responses of the FDA radar and SFP-FDA are shown in Figure 4. In the FDA radar, owing to the angle-range coupling, the target cannot be localized effectively in both domains. Using the double-pulse FDA approach proposed in [31], the target angle can be estimated to be θ⌢s=0° by using the first pulse which can be seen as phased array, and then the target range can be estimated to be r⌢s=50km by taking advantage of the second pulse with FDA, as shown in Figure 5. Similarly, using the method mentioned in Section 4, as shown in Figure 6, we can localize the target in angle-range dimensions as 0°,50km. Note that the pulse number M, the element number N, and the frequency increments Δft and Δfa all affect the range resolution.Figure 4
Comparative target response: (a) FDA radar and (b) SFP-FDA radar.
(a)
(b)Figure 5
Target response by double-pulse FDA radar: (a) the first step and (b) the second step.
(a)
(b)Figure 6
Target response by SFP-FDA radar: (a) the angle profile and (b) the range profile.
(a)
(b)While compared with the double-pulse FDA radar, our proposed scheme has lower sidelobe and more concentrated energy in the mainlobe area. Besides, different from FDA radar, SFP-FDA radar has a range-angle decoupling beampattern.SFP-FDA radar can estimate the coordinates of target by only one step, whereas the double-pulse FDA radar demands two steps.By comparing Figure5 with Figure 6, it can be observed that, despite the equal angle response of both the radars, the SFP-FDA outperforms the FDA in the range profile, i.e., the former has a narrower mainlobe and much lower sidelobe.Then, we plotted Figure7, which compared the 3 dB resolution performance of FDA and SFP-FDA. Clearly, the advantage of SFP-FDA in range dimension can be observed, which is consistent with the theoretical analysis in Section 3.Figure 7
Comparative 3 dB resolution of FDA and SFP-FDA.


## 6.2. Two Targets with Different Angle and Different Range

Assuming that the two targets are located in coordinatesθs1,rs1=0°,50km and θs2,rs2=30°,60km. Figure 8 gives the target response of FDA radar and SFP-FDA radar. Since the two targets have different angle, it can be noticed that due to the angle-range coupling, it is very difficult to separate the peaks in both angle and range domains from the FDA beamformer output.Figure 8
Comparative target response of two targets: (a) FDA radar and (b) SFP-FDA radar.
(a)
(b)By utilizing the first step of the double-pulse FDA radar, the angle of the targets can be received, namely,0° and 30°. But when the second step is carried out, there are two peaks in each angle, as shown in Figure 9; thus, four targets have been obtained, and we cannot distinguish which ones are the real ones. The four targets can then be localized in angle-range dimensions as 0°,50km, 0°,35km, 30°,60km, and 30°,75km. Furthermore, by this means, we cannot accurately identify whether there are 2 targets, 3 targets, or even 4 targets.Figure 9
Range response of double-pulse FDA in the second processing step: (a)θs1=0° and (b) θs2=30°.
(a)
(b)Figures10 and 11 give the target response of SFP-FDA radar, the two targets can be directly identified both in the angle and range dimensions, and then they can be localized in 0°,50km and 30°,60km.Figure 10
The first target response: (a) the angle profile and (b) the range profile.
(a)
(b)Figure 11
The second target response: (a) the angle profile and (b) the range profile.
(a)
(b)It is evident that the two targets can be easily distinguished by the proposed scheme, which demonstrates the effectiveness of the SFP-FDA radar in resolving multiple targets. This simulation example shows that the SFP-FDA radar achieves better performance than the double-pulse FDA radar.


## 6.3. Estimation Performance

In this subsection, as compared to the double-pulse FDA radar, we simulated the performance of the proposed angle-range localization approach in terms of CRLB. Figure12 shows the comparative performance of localization as a function of the SNR between the proposed scheme and the double-pulse FDA radar.Figure 12
Comparative performance of range-angle localization: (a) the angle domain and (b) the range domain.
(a)
(b)Figures12(a) and 12(b) show the CRLB in the angle and range domain, respectively. It can be seen that the SFP-FDA radar can achieve a better estimation performance in both angle and range dimension, even when the number of its pulses is the same as that of the double-pulse FDA radar, that is, when M=2. Moreover, it is evident that the performance of both in the angle and range domains is improved as the SNR and the number of pulses increase. As shown in Figure 12, the SFP-FDA with M=16 performs better than the SFP-FDA with M=2. It is clear that the SFP-FDA radar achieves better estimation performance at the cost of much higher computation complexity.


## 7. Conclusion

Since the beampattern produced by conventional FDA is angle-range coupling, a novel scheme called stepped frequency pulse FDA radar is proposed in this paper, which can decouple the angle and range responses in the transmit beamforming. Only one step procedure is needed to localize the targets in angles and ranges simultaneously, and the range resolution of targets outperforms that of double-pulse FDA radar. The proposed system has a stronger ability in identifying the multiple targets with different angles and different ranges. It has also been shown that the proposed radar achieves a better CRLB performance than the double-pulse FDA radar, though at the expense of a certain amount of computational complexity. Certainly, further investigations will consider the Doppler of targets. With new application potentials, combining with netted radar networks and MIMO radar technology can effectively improve the radar performance, and it can also be investigated in a future work.



---

*Source: 8962048-2018-09-12.xml*