# Synthesis and Characterization of Acrylic Acid-g-(κ-Carrageenan) Copolymer and Study of Its Application

Authors: Arti Srivastava; Rajesh Kumar
Journal: International Journal of Carbohydrate Chemistry
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

The effects of concentrations of peroxymonosulphate, mercaptosuccinic acid, hydrogen ion, acrylic acid, and carrageenan on grafting parameters were studied to find out the maximum grafting ratio. The corresponding values were found to be14.0×10-3, 32×10-3, 15.0×10-3, 18.0×10-2 mol dm−3, and 1.0×10-2 g dm−3, respectively. The optimal reaction time duration and reaction temperature were found to be 120 min and 40°C, respectively. The effect of hydrogen ion variation from 5.0 up to 25.0×10-4 mol dm−3 shows prompt changes on grafting parameter. The grafted copolymer was found more thermally stable than the ungrafted substrate. Also the grafted copolymer absorbed more water, namely hazardous metal cations. Hg2+, Pb2+, and Cd2+, showed better flocculation behavior than carrageenan.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Currently the commercial application of natural polymers and their derivatives is most captivating and immeasurably investigated. For this purpose, biodegradable natural polymers, such as polysaccharides and protein, have been widely used [1, 2]. Amongst the natural polysaccharides, carrageenan is widely applied due to its anionic nature. It is extracted from red seaweed and obtained from the cell wall of Rhodophyceae (red algae) belonging mainly to the genera Chondrus, Gigartina, Kappaphycus, and Eucheuma [3, 4]. Carrageenan is a linear polymer of about 25,000 galactose derivatives with regular but imprecise structures, depending on the source and extraction conditions. Carrageenans are usually classified according to their sulphate content. From an industrial application point of view, the most important configurations are the κ (kappa),  ι (iota), and λ (lambda) forms; their structures differ mostly in the number of sulphated groups per disaccharide: one, two, or three for κ, ι, and λ, respectively. They are composed of alternation-(1→3)-β-D-galactopyranose-4-sulfate-(1→4)-3,6-anhydro-α-D-galactopyranose-(1→3) (Figure 1) which are well documented [5–9]. The presence of 3,6-anhydro-D-galactose and conformation of the pyranoside ring are responsible for their interesting rheological properties. κ-carrageenan is widely used as a thickening and gelling agent in food industry [10–12]. κ-carrageenan undergoes a coil (disordered state) to helix (ordered) transition, depending on temperature and ionic environment. Gelation is achieved through junction zones formed by the helices, leading to a three-dimensional network [5].Figure 1
Structure ofκ-carrageenan[-(1,3)-β-D-galactopyranose-4-sulphate-(1,4)-3,6-anhydro-α-D-galactopyranasoe(1,3)-].Gelation ofι-carrageenan is enhanced mainly by calcium, and κ-carrageenan is enhanced by potassium. It is reported [13] that cations Ca2+>K+>Na+ bind to the carrageenan, blocking the sulphate groups and thereby preventing interaction with thaumatin (a basic protein). In recent years, Yuan et al. [14]. and Zhang et al. [15, 16] have demonstrated their significant role in antioxidant activities and explored them as effective excipients in controlled drug release delivery systems [17, 18].Despite their numerous applications,κ-carrageenan suffers from drawbacks like easier susceptibility of microbial attack, which is destroying the gelation. Free radical initiated graft copolymerization provides green and efficient approach for removing the drawback of easier susceptibility of microbial attack due to use of water, which is an easily decomposable oxidant and reductant and needs fairly lower temperature than any other radical initiated polymerization process like ATRP, RAFT, NMP, and so forth, which are generally carried out in nonaqueous media. Up to date many investigations were carried out on graft copolymerization reactions in view of preparing biopolymers-based materials [19–23]. A Few recent reports highlighted the grafting of κ-carrageenan with vinyl monomers [24–30], but no report showed the effect of grafting on gelation of carrageenan. In view of gelation properties of κ-carrageenan, this work has been carried for the first time out with an aim to tailor κ-carrageenan based hybrid materials by grafting of acrylic acid using peroxymonosulphate/mercaptosuccinic acid redox pair. The optimal grafting conditions were obtained for gelation, and studies were carried out on swelling capacity, metal ion sorption, and flocculating ability.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Materials

Acrylic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was distilled under reduced pressure in inert atmosphere at 14°C. Peroxymonosulphate was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, USA, and mercaptosuccinic acid, sulphuric acid, and methanol were purchased from Merck, India and used as received.κ-carrageenan was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, USA.


### 2.2. Synthesis of Acrylic Acid-g-(κ-Carrageenan) Copolymer

The grafted copolymer of carrageenan and acrylic acid was synthesized by using peroxymonosulphate/mercaptosuccinic acid redox initiator in inert atmosphere. In each case carrageenan solution was prepared by adding a precalculated amount of carrageenan to 100 mL triple distilled water in a three-neck reactor to achieve the desired concentration of 1.0 g dm−3. To determine the optimal conditions for the grafting of acrylic acid onto carrageenan, using PMS/mercaptosuccinic acid as redox initiator, graft copolymerization was carried out under various reaction times, temperatures, and concentrations of PMS, mercaptosuccinic acid, carrageenan, hydrogen ion, and acrylic acid. A definite concentration of sulphuric acid (15.0×10-4 mol dm−3) was found essential to start the reaction. A definite amount of mercaptosuccinic acid and acrylic acid solutions, that is, 32.0×10-4 mol dm−3 and 18.0×10-2 mol dm−3, respectively, was added to the reaction mixture. The stream of nitrogen gas was passed into the solution and in peroxymonosulphate solution separately. After the desired time interval (30 min), the reaction was initiated by addition of 14.0×10-3 mol dm−3 peroxymonosulphate solution. The reaction was allowed to continue for 120 minute, after which the reaction mixture was poured into water-methanol mixture (58 : 42 v/v). The grafted copolymer precipitates out, whereas polyacrylic acid remained in the solution. The graft copolymer was separated by filtration and washed with water-methanol mixture (two times) so that any homopolymer stuck to the grafted copolymer sample pass into the filtrate. The grafted copolymer thus obtained was dried in vacuum oven at 40°C and weighed.


### 2.3. Separation of Homopolymer

For the separation of homopolymer from the filtrate, a pinch of hydroquinone was added to the filtrate, and the homopolymer solution was concentrated by distillation under reduced pressure at room temperature. Thereafter, polyacrylic acid was precipitated by acidifying the reduced amount as given by [31], filtered, dried, and weighed.


### 2.4. Characterization

#### 2.4.1. Determination of Grafting Parameters

The grafting parameters were calculated according to Fanta’s (1973) definition [32] in terms of grafting ratio (%G), grafting efficiency (%E), add on (%A), conversion (%C), and homopolymer (%H):
(1)%G=WeightofgraftedcopolymerWeightofκ-carrageenan×100,%A=WeightofsyntheticpolymerWeightofgraftedcopolymer×100,
where synthetic polymer/polymer formed is a polymer as homopolymer and incorporated into the κ-carrageenan chain:
(2)%C=WeightofpolymerformedWeightofmonomercharged×100,%E=WeightofgraftedcopolymerWeightofpolymerformed×100,%H=100-%E.
Besides the above parameters, the rate of grafting (Rg) was calculated according to the following formula [33]:
(3)Rg=Weightofgraftedpolymer(W)Vol.(V)×time(T)×m.wt.ofAA(M)×1000(molL-1s-1),
where W=Weightofgraftedgum-weightofungraftedgum.To determine the optimal condition for the grafting of acrylic acid onto carrageenan, using PMS/mercaptosuccinic acid as redox initiator, graft copolymerization was carried out under various reaction times, temperatures, and concentrations of PMS, mercaptosuccinic acid, carrageenan, hydrogen ion, and acrylic acid.


#### 2.4.2. Techniques

FT-IR spectra on KBr disc were recorded on a Varian Excalibur 3000 (Palo Alto, CA) spectrophotometer in the region 4000–400 cm−1. The electronic absorption spectra was recorded on Perkin Elmer-Lambda 35 UV-VIS spectrometer connected with PTP-1 Peltier system at 25°C. The optical path length of measurement cell was 10 mm. The thermal behavior of pure carrageenan and acrylic acid-g-carrageenan was recorded on a Perkin Elmer and Diamond TG/DTA thermal analyzer within a temperature range 25–1000°C at a heating rate of 15°C/min in N2.


### 2.5. Studies on Properties

#### 2.5.1. Swelling Test

The swelling behavior of polyacrylic acid was carried out in water for one hour, and the sample was prepared by taking the different grafting ratios (Table1) of acrylic acid. These studies were carried out by adding 0.100 g of poly(acrylic acid) into 20 mL triple distilled water and keeping undisturbed for 120 minutes at constant temperature to get the swelling equilibrium. The surface water on the swollen polyacrylic acid was removed by safely pressing between the folds of the moisten filter paper, and weights were taken. Percent swelling (PS) and swelling ratio (SR) have been calculated by using the following expressions [34]:
(4)PS=Weightofswollenpolymer-WeightofthedrypolymerWeightofthedrypolymer×100,SR=PS100.Table 1
Grafting ratio and swelling behavior of acrylic acid-g-carrageenan as a function of the concentration of acrylic acid. [PMS] = 14.0 × 10−3 mol dm−3; [MSA] = 32.0 × 10−4 mol dm−3; [H+] = 15.0 × 10−4 mol dm−3; [CGN] = 1.0 g dm−3; Time = 120 min.; Temp = 40°C.
Sample Code
[Acrylic acid] × 102 mol dm−3
%G
P
S
S
R
CAA1
8.0
330.0
310
3.1
CAA2
12.0
336.0
328
3.3
CAA3
16.0
380.0
342
3.4
CAA4
18.0
510.0
390
3.9
CAA5
20.0
535.0
396
4.0
CAA6
22.0
494.0
382
3.8
CAA7
24.0
450.0
360
3.6
[PMS] = concentration of potassium peroxymonosulphate, [MSA] = concentration of mercaptosuccininc acid, [CGN] = concentration of carrageenan.


#### 2.5.2. Viscosity Measurement

Viscosity measurements of the aqueous solutions of carrageenan and the grafted copolymers (acrylic acid-g-carrageenan) were carried out with an Ubbelohde viscometer at30±0.1°C.


#### 2.5.3. Absorption of Metal Ions: Removal of Hazardous Metal Ions

The metal-ion sorption studies were carried out on the different grafted copolymers obtained by varying the concentration of acrylic acid (Table2). For this, 0.05 g acrylic acid-g-carrageenan with different molecular weight were placed in a 5 mL solution of a metal ion with a known concentration and kept for 24 h. After 24 h absorption, the concentration of the metal solution was determined by a standard method [35]. For the metal-ion sorption studies, five metal ions were selected, namely, Cu2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, Pb2+, and Hg2+. The sorption behavior of the polymer for those five metal ions was investigated in terms of the following parameters [36]:
(5)Percentionuptake(Pu)=AmountofmetalioninthepolymerAmountofmetalioninthefeed×100,Partitioncoefficient(Kd)=AmountofmetalioninthepolymerAmountofthemetalionleftinthesolution×Volumeofthesolution(mL)Weightofthedrypolymer(mg),RetentionCapacity(Qr)=AmountofmetalioninthepolymerWeightofthedrypolymer.Table 2
Metal ion sorption.
Sample Code
%G
Percent ion uptake (Pu)
Partition coefficient (Kd)
Retention capacity (Qr)
Cu2+
Ni2+
Zn2+
Pb2+
Hg2+
Cu2+
Ni2+
Zn2+
Pb2+
Hg2+
Cu2+
Ni2+
Zn2+
Pb2+
Hg2+
C
—
3.1
2.1
1.8
4.1
1.0
16.1
5.4
4.8
10.8
5.2
1.5
0.50
0.5
1.0
0.5
CAA1
330
5.18
4.73
3.80
4.16
3.27
27.35
24.83
19.76
21.73
16.91
2.5
2.3
2.0
2.1
1.6
CAA2
336
7.88
6.79
5.32
6.15
4.49
42.79
36.42
28.11
32.76
23.55
3.8
3.3
2.8
3.1
2.2
CAA3
380
9.54
8.43
7.60
8.13
6.33
52.75
46.06
41.15
44.27
33.84
4.6
4.1
4.0
4.1
3.1
CAA4
510
8.09
7.40
5.13
6.94
4.90
44.01
40.00
27.05
37.31
25.80
3.9
3.6
2.7
3.5
2.4
CAA5
535
4.97
4.11
2.66
3.57
2.45
26.20
21.46
13.67
18.51
12.57
2.4
2.0
1.4
1.8
1.2


#### 2.5.4. Flocculation Test

Into a 1 L beaker, 200 mL of 1 wt% coal suspension was added. The beaker was placed on flocculator (Sonar Jar Set Digital Apparatus), dipping the stirrer blade in the suspension. At a 100 rpm stirring condition, a required quantity of polymer solution was added to the beaker to make a predetermined dose with respect to suspension volume. After the addition of the polymer solution, the suspension was stirred at a constant rpm (600) for 15 min. The flocks were allowed to settle down for one hour. Clean supernatant liquid was drawn from a depth of 1.0 cm, and its turbidity was measured using a digital Nephelometer (Eutech Instruments Digital Turbidity Meter TN-100 supplied by Merck, India). The turbidity is expressed in nephelometric unit (NTU).


## 2.1. Materials

Acrylic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was distilled under reduced pressure in inert atmosphere at 14°C. Peroxymonosulphate was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, USA, and mercaptosuccinic acid, sulphuric acid, and methanol were purchased from Merck, India and used as received.κ-carrageenan was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, USA.


## 2.2. Synthesis of Acrylic Acid-g-(κ-Carrageenan) Copolymer

The grafted copolymer of carrageenan and acrylic acid was synthesized by using peroxymonosulphate/mercaptosuccinic acid redox initiator in inert atmosphere. In each case carrageenan solution was prepared by adding a precalculated amount of carrageenan to 100 mL triple distilled water in a three-neck reactor to achieve the desired concentration of 1.0 g dm−3. To determine the optimal conditions for the grafting of acrylic acid onto carrageenan, using PMS/mercaptosuccinic acid as redox initiator, graft copolymerization was carried out under various reaction times, temperatures, and concentrations of PMS, mercaptosuccinic acid, carrageenan, hydrogen ion, and acrylic acid. A definite concentration of sulphuric acid (15.0×10-4 mol dm−3) was found essential to start the reaction. A definite amount of mercaptosuccinic acid and acrylic acid solutions, that is, 32.0×10-4 mol dm−3 and 18.0×10-2 mol dm−3, respectively, was added to the reaction mixture. The stream of nitrogen gas was passed into the solution and in peroxymonosulphate solution separately. After the desired time interval (30 min), the reaction was initiated by addition of 14.0×10-3 mol dm−3 peroxymonosulphate solution. The reaction was allowed to continue for 120 minute, after which the reaction mixture was poured into water-methanol mixture (58 : 42 v/v). The grafted copolymer precipitates out, whereas polyacrylic acid remained in the solution. The graft copolymer was separated by filtration and washed with water-methanol mixture (two times) so that any homopolymer stuck to the grafted copolymer sample pass into the filtrate. The grafted copolymer thus obtained was dried in vacuum oven at 40°C and weighed.


## 2.3. Separation of Homopolymer

For the separation of homopolymer from the filtrate, a pinch of hydroquinone was added to the filtrate, and the homopolymer solution was concentrated by distillation under reduced pressure at room temperature. Thereafter, polyacrylic acid was precipitated by acidifying the reduced amount as given by [31], filtered, dried, and weighed.


## 2.4. Characterization

### 2.4.1. Determination of Grafting Parameters

The grafting parameters were calculated according to Fanta’s (1973) definition [32] in terms of grafting ratio (%G), grafting efficiency (%E), add on (%A), conversion (%C), and homopolymer (%H):
(1)%G=WeightofgraftedcopolymerWeightofκ-carrageenan×100,%A=WeightofsyntheticpolymerWeightofgraftedcopolymer×100,
where synthetic polymer/polymer formed is a polymer as homopolymer and incorporated into the κ-carrageenan chain:
(2)%C=WeightofpolymerformedWeightofmonomercharged×100,%E=WeightofgraftedcopolymerWeightofpolymerformed×100,%H=100-%E.
Besides the above parameters, the rate of grafting (Rg) was calculated according to the following formula [33]:
(3)Rg=Weightofgraftedpolymer(W)Vol.(V)×time(T)×m.wt.ofAA(M)×1000(molL-1s-1),
where W=Weightofgraftedgum-weightofungraftedgum.To determine the optimal condition for the grafting of acrylic acid onto carrageenan, using PMS/mercaptosuccinic acid as redox initiator, graft copolymerization was carried out under various reaction times, temperatures, and concentrations of PMS, mercaptosuccinic acid, carrageenan, hydrogen ion, and acrylic acid.


### 2.4.2. Techniques

FT-IR spectra on KBr disc were recorded on a Varian Excalibur 3000 (Palo Alto, CA) spectrophotometer in the region 4000–400 cm−1. The electronic absorption spectra was recorded on Perkin Elmer-Lambda 35 UV-VIS spectrometer connected with PTP-1 Peltier system at 25°C. The optical path length of measurement cell was 10 mm. The thermal behavior of pure carrageenan and acrylic acid-g-carrageenan was recorded on a Perkin Elmer and Diamond TG/DTA thermal analyzer within a temperature range 25–1000°C at a heating rate of 15°C/min in N2.


## 2.4.1. Determination of Grafting Parameters

The grafting parameters were calculated according to Fanta’s (1973) definition [32] in terms of grafting ratio (%G), grafting efficiency (%E), add on (%A), conversion (%C), and homopolymer (%H):
(1)%G=WeightofgraftedcopolymerWeightofκ-carrageenan×100,%A=WeightofsyntheticpolymerWeightofgraftedcopolymer×100,
where synthetic polymer/polymer formed is a polymer as homopolymer and incorporated into the κ-carrageenan chain:
(2)%C=WeightofpolymerformedWeightofmonomercharged×100,%E=WeightofgraftedcopolymerWeightofpolymerformed×100,%H=100-%E.
Besides the above parameters, the rate of grafting (Rg) was calculated according to the following formula [33]:
(3)Rg=Weightofgraftedpolymer(W)Vol.(V)×time(T)×m.wt.ofAA(M)×1000(molL-1s-1),
where W=Weightofgraftedgum-weightofungraftedgum.To determine the optimal condition for the grafting of acrylic acid onto carrageenan, using PMS/mercaptosuccinic acid as redox initiator, graft copolymerization was carried out under various reaction times, temperatures, and concentrations of PMS, mercaptosuccinic acid, carrageenan, hydrogen ion, and acrylic acid.


## 2.4.2. Techniques

FT-IR spectra on KBr disc were recorded on a Varian Excalibur 3000 (Palo Alto, CA) spectrophotometer in the region 4000–400 cm−1. The electronic absorption spectra was recorded on Perkin Elmer-Lambda 35 UV-VIS spectrometer connected with PTP-1 Peltier system at 25°C. The optical path length of measurement cell was 10 mm. The thermal behavior of pure carrageenan and acrylic acid-g-carrageenan was recorded on a Perkin Elmer and Diamond TG/DTA thermal analyzer within a temperature range 25–1000°C at a heating rate of 15°C/min in N2.


## 2.5. Studies on Properties

### 2.5.1. Swelling Test

The swelling behavior of polyacrylic acid was carried out in water for one hour, and the sample was prepared by taking the different grafting ratios (Table1) of acrylic acid. These studies were carried out by adding 0.100 g of poly(acrylic acid) into 20 mL triple distilled water and keeping undisturbed for 120 minutes at constant temperature to get the swelling equilibrium. The surface water on the swollen polyacrylic acid was removed by safely pressing between the folds of the moisten filter paper, and weights were taken. Percent swelling (PS) and swelling ratio (SR) have been calculated by using the following expressions [34]:
(4)PS=Weightofswollenpolymer-WeightofthedrypolymerWeightofthedrypolymer×100,SR=PS100.Table 1
Grafting ratio and swelling behavior of acrylic acid-g-carrageenan as a function of the concentration of acrylic acid. [PMS] = 14.0 × 10−3 mol dm−3; [MSA] = 32.0 × 10−4 mol dm−3; [H+] = 15.0 × 10−4 mol dm−3; [CGN] = 1.0 g dm−3; Time = 120 min.; Temp = 40°C.
Sample Code
[Acrylic acid] × 102 mol dm−3
%G
P
S
S
R
CAA1
8.0
330.0
310
3.1
CAA2
12.0
336.0
328
3.3
CAA3
16.0
380.0
342
3.4
CAA4
18.0
510.0
390
3.9
CAA5
20.0
535.0
396
4.0
CAA6
22.0
494.0
382
3.8
CAA7
24.0
450.0
360
3.6
[PMS] = concentration of potassium peroxymonosulphate, [MSA] = concentration of mercaptosuccininc acid, [CGN] = concentration of carrageenan.


### 2.5.2. Viscosity Measurement

Viscosity measurements of the aqueous solutions of carrageenan and the grafted copolymers (acrylic acid-g-carrageenan) were carried out with an Ubbelohde viscometer at30±0.1°C.


### 2.5.3. Absorption of Metal Ions: Removal of Hazardous Metal Ions

The metal-ion sorption studies were carried out on the different grafted copolymers obtained by varying the concentration of acrylic acid (Table2). For this, 0.05 g acrylic acid-g-carrageenan with different molecular weight were placed in a 5 mL solution of a metal ion with a known concentration and kept for 24 h. After 24 h absorption, the concentration of the metal solution was determined by a standard method [35]. For the metal-ion sorption studies, five metal ions were selected, namely, Cu2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, Pb2+, and Hg2+. The sorption behavior of the polymer for those five metal ions was investigated in terms of the following parameters [36]:
(5)Percentionuptake(Pu)=AmountofmetalioninthepolymerAmountofmetalioninthefeed×100,Partitioncoefficient(Kd)=AmountofmetalioninthepolymerAmountofthemetalionleftinthesolution×Volumeofthesolution(mL)Weightofthedrypolymer(mg),RetentionCapacity(Qr)=AmountofmetalioninthepolymerWeightofthedrypolymer.Table 2
Metal ion sorption.
Sample Code
%G
Percent ion uptake (Pu)
Partition coefficient (Kd)
Retention capacity (Qr)
Cu2+
Ni2+
Zn2+
Pb2+
Hg2+
Cu2+
Ni2+
Zn2+
Pb2+
Hg2+
Cu2+
Ni2+
Zn2+
Pb2+
Hg2+
C
—
3.1
2.1
1.8
4.1
1.0
16.1
5.4
4.8
10.8
5.2
1.5
0.50
0.5
1.0
0.5
CAA1
330
5.18
4.73
3.80
4.16
3.27
27.35
24.83
19.76
21.73
16.91
2.5
2.3
2.0
2.1
1.6
CAA2
336
7.88
6.79
5.32
6.15
4.49
42.79
36.42
28.11
32.76
23.55
3.8
3.3
2.8
3.1
2.2
CAA3
380
9.54
8.43
7.60
8.13
6.33
52.75
46.06
41.15
44.27
33.84
4.6
4.1
4.0
4.1
3.1
CAA4
510
8.09
7.40
5.13
6.94
4.90
44.01
40.00
27.05
37.31
25.80
3.9
3.6
2.7
3.5
2.4
CAA5
535
4.97
4.11
2.66
3.57
2.45
26.20
21.46
13.67
18.51
12.57
2.4
2.0
1.4
1.8
1.2


### 2.5.4. Flocculation Test

Into a 1 L beaker, 200 mL of 1 wt% coal suspension was added. The beaker was placed on flocculator (Sonar Jar Set Digital Apparatus), dipping the stirrer blade in the suspension. At a 100 rpm stirring condition, a required quantity of polymer solution was added to the beaker to make a predetermined dose with respect to suspension volume. After the addition of the polymer solution, the suspension was stirred at a constant rpm (600) for 15 min. The flocks were allowed to settle down for one hour. Clean supernatant liquid was drawn from a depth of 1.0 cm, and its turbidity was measured using a digital Nephelometer (Eutech Instruments Digital Turbidity Meter TN-100 supplied by Merck, India). The turbidity is expressed in nephelometric unit (NTU).


## 2.5.1. Swelling Test

The swelling behavior of polyacrylic acid was carried out in water for one hour, and the sample was prepared by taking the different grafting ratios (Table1) of acrylic acid. These studies were carried out by adding 0.100 g of poly(acrylic acid) into 20 mL triple distilled water and keeping undisturbed for 120 minutes at constant temperature to get the swelling equilibrium. The surface water on the swollen polyacrylic acid was removed by safely pressing between the folds of the moisten filter paper, and weights were taken. Percent swelling (PS) and swelling ratio (SR) have been calculated by using the following expressions [34]:
(4)PS=Weightofswollenpolymer-WeightofthedrypolymerWeightofthedrypolymer×100,SR=PS100.Table 1
Grafting ratio and swelling behavior of acrylic acid-g-carrageenan as a function of the concentration of acrylic acid. [PMS] = 14.0 × 10−3 mol dm−3; [MSA] = 32.0 × 10−4 mol dm−3; [H+] = 15.0 × 10−4 mol dm−3; [CGN] = 1.0 g dm−3; Time = 120 min.; Temp = 40°C.
Sample Code
[Acrylic acid] × 102 mol dm−3
%G
P
S
S
R
CAA1
8.0
330.0
310
3.1
CAA2
12.0
336.0
328
3.3
CAA3
16.0
380.0
342
3.4
CAA4
18.0
510.0
390
3.9
CAA5
20.0
535.0
396
4.0
CAA6
22.0
494.0
382
3.8
CAA7
24.0
450.0
360
3.6
[PMS] = concentration of potassium peroxymonosulphate, [MSA] = concentration of mercaptosuccininc acid, [CGN] = concentration of carrageenan.


## 2.5.2. Viscosity Measurement

Viscosity measurements of the aqueous solutions of carrageenan and the grafted copolymers (acrylic acid-g-carrageenan) were carried out with an Ubbelohde viscometer at30±0.1°C.


## 2.5.3. Absorption of Metal Ions: Removal of Hazardous Metal Ions

The metal-ion sorption studies were carried out on the different grafted copolymers obtained by varying the concentration of acrylic acid (Table2). For this, 0.05 g acrylic acid-g-carrageenan with different molecular weight were placed in a 5 mL solution of a metal ion with a known concentration and kept for 24 h. After 24 h absorption, the concentration of the metal solution was determined by a standard method [35]. For the metal-ion sorption studies, five metal ions were selected, namely, Cu2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, Pb2+, and Hg2+. The sorption behavior of the polymer for those five metal ions was investigated in terms of the following parameters [36]:
(5)Percentionuptake(Pu)=AmountofmetalioninthepolymerAmountofmetalioninthefeed×100,Partitioncoefficient(Kd)=AmountofmetalioninthepolymerAmountofthemetalionleftinthesolution×Volumeofthesolution(mL)Weightofthedrypolymer(mg),RetentionCapacity(Qr)=AmountofmetalioninthepolymerWeightofthedrypolymer.Table 2
Metal ion sorption.
Sample Code
%G
Percent ion uptake (Pu)
Partition coefficient (Kd)
Retention capacity (Qr)
Cu2+
Ni2+
Zn2+
Pb2+
Hg2+
Cu2+
Ni2+
Zn2+
Pb2+
Hg2+
Cu2+
Ni2+
Zn2+
Pb2+
Hg2+
C
—
3.1
2.1
1.8
4.1
1.0
16.1
5.4
4.8
10.8
5.2
1.5
0.50
0.5
1.0
0.5
CAA1
330
5.18
4.73
3.80
4.16
3.27
27.35
24.83
19.76
21.73
16.91
2.5
2.3
2.0
2.1
1.6
CAA2
336
7.88
6.79
5.32
6.15
4.49
42.79
36.42
28.11
32.76
23.55
3.8
3.3
2.8
3.1
2.2
CAA3
380
9.54
8.43
7.60
8.13
6.33
52.75
46.06
41.15
44.27
33.84
4.6
4.1
4.0
4.1
3.1
CAA4
510
8.09
7.40
5.13
6.94
4.90
44.01
40.00
27.05
37.31
25.80
3.9
3.6
2.7
3.5
2.4
CAA5
535
4.97
4.11
2.66
3.57
2.45
26.20
21.46
13.67
18.51
12.57
2.4
2.0
1.4
1.8
1.2


## 2.5.4. Flocculation Test

Into a 1 L beaker, 200 mL of 1 wt% coal suspension was added. The beaker was placed on flocculator (Sonar Jar Set Digital Apparatus), dipping the stirrer blade in the suspension. At a 100 rpm stirring condition, a required quantity of polymer solution was added to the beaker to make a predetermined dose with respect to suspension volume. After the addition of the polymer solution, the suspension was stirred at a constant rpm (600) for 15 min. The flocks were allowed to settle down for one hour. Clean supernatant liquid was drawn from a depth of 1.0 cm, and its turbidity was measured using a digital Nephelometer (Eutech Instruments Digital Turbidity Meter TN-100 supplied by Merck, India). The turbidity is expressed in nephelometric unit (NTU).


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. FTIR Analysis

The FTIR spectrum of acrylic acid-g-carrageenan showed the peaks of poly(acrylic acid) as well as carrageenan (Figure2). The following additional peaks/bands in the spectrum of acrylic acids-g-carrageenan were observed. The broad band of the hydrogen bonding with carboxylic group –OH stretching disappeared from the region 3000–3500 cm−1 in graft copolymer spectrum, while the band at 2730–3050 cm−1 is attributed to stretching vibration of nonhydrogen bonded OH stretching. This suggests that the polymeric network is arranged in such a way that the possibility of hydrogen bonding is diminished. The peak at 1740 cm−1 is attributed to stretching vibration of carbonyl group of acrylic acid. The broad and intense bands centered at 1240 cm−1 and 1450 cm−1 are attributed to C–O stretching and C–O–H bending vibrations. The presence of these bands/peaks confirms the grafting of poly(acrylic acid) onto carrageenan backbone. Thus, the presence of these bands and disappearance of O–H bending vibration in the spectrum of carrageenan prove that acrylic acid was grafted onto O–H site of the carrageenan macromolecule.Figure 2
FTIR spectra of acrylic acid, carrageenan, and acrylic acid-g-carrageenan.


### 3.2. UV Analysis

Figure3 shows UV visible spectra of acrylic acid and carrageenan-g-acrylic acid in the region 200 to 400 nm. UV-visible spectrum of carrageenan shows the sharp peak at 223 nm and a broad shoulder between 300 and 340 nm, while no absorption has been seen in the spectrum of acrylic acid. The spectrum of carrageenan-g-acrylic acid clearly indicates the incorporation of the above peak in the graft copolymer with major shift of the peak appeared at 223 nm to 280 nm and shoulder between 340 and 403 nm. These peaks and shoulders are due to carbonyl chromophore of acrylic acid, which confirms the grafting of acrylic acid onto carrageenan.Figure 3
UV-visible spectra of acrylic acid-g-carrageenan and carrageenan.


### 3.3. Studies on Properties

#### 3.3.1. Swelling Studies

The effect of swelling behavior on grafting ratio was studied by varying the concentration of acrylic acid from 8.0 to24.0×10-2 mol dm−3 (Table 1). It was observed that percent swelling and swelling ratio of the grafted copolymer increase with increasing the grafting ratio. This is due to the hydrophilic nature of acrylic acid. The increase in percentage of poly (acrylic acid) chain on to carrageenan provides more hydrophilicity to graft copolymer thereby increases in percent swelling and swelling ratio were observed.


#### 3.3.2. Resistance to Biodegradation

If two polymers have a similar molecular weight, a branched polymer’s hydrodynamic volume will be lower, and hence it will have a lower viscosity than the linear polymer. It was observed that relative viscosity of acrylic acid-g-carrageenan is lower than the carrageenan (Figure4). This might be due to the presence of grafted chains, which make the molecule more flexible and reduce the viscosity drastically [37]. Initially up to 40 hours, viscosity of the grafted copolymer solution was increased that was due the swelling nature of polyacrylic acid chains, which absorbs water resulting in swelling in grafted copolymer. Carrageenan, like other polysaccharide solutions, is highly prone to biodegradation, and it was found that its solution after 70 h of preparation started to degrade, and after 10 days, the solution showed considerable loss of viscosity (Figure 4). The graft copolymer solution was subjected to the same type of study for biodegradation, and it was observed that graft copolymer solution showed no loss of viscosity up to 10 days (Figure 4). These results show that the grafted copolymer is less susceptible to biodegradation, and similar results were reported by others [37] also. This is in agreement with the fact that by incorporating relatively poly(acrylic acid) chains onto carrageenan, the carrageenan can be made less susceptible to bacterial attack [38]. Thus, it can be concluded that, by incorporation of poly(acrylic acid) onto carrageenan through graft copolymerization, the resistance to biodegradation of carrageenan can be improved.Figure 4
Relative viscosity of pure carrageenan and acrylic acid-g-carrageenan as a function of time.


#### 3.3.3. Metal Ion Sorption: Removal of Hazardous Metal Ions

Hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance and nature of monomer are major factors that affect the metal ion uptake [39]. These functionalities can be tailored and incorporated by grafting to retain metal ions by polymer analogous reaction or by simple chelation absorption due to the opening of polymer matrix or pores created. Out of these possibilities, all may contribute in the metal ion sorption, although the extent of contribution of possibilities may vary [40]. However, functional group incorporated with the help of grafting by its ability to interact with metal ions may play more important role in determination of selectivity and quantum of metal ion absorption [41]. Five metal ions were chosen (Cu2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, Pb2+, and Hg2+) for the study of metal ion sorption. The amount of metal ion absorption was calculated by titrating the unabsorbed metal ions. The increases in the values of Pu, Kd, and Qr up to 380%G (Table 2) might have been caused by the increase in poly(acrylic acid) chains, which accounts for the higher absorption of these divalent cations through a chelating reaction [42]. The highest percent ion uptake was found for Copper ions, while the lowest percent ion uptake was for mercury ions. The decreases in the values of Pu, Kd, and Qr when the grafting ratio was higher than 380 are due to the increase in viscosity of the medium.


#### 3.3.4. Flocculation Behaviour

Flocculation efficiencies of carrageenan backbone and its poly(acrylic acid) grafted copolymer were measured by the turbidity value of the supernatant liquid. Plots of polymer dosage versus supernatant turbidity for coking and noncoking coals are presented in Figure5. It was found that grafted copolymer showed better performance with low turbidity than the pure substrate. In the grafted copolymer, the hanging of poly(acrylic acid) chains led to better accessibility to the contaminant coal particles and hence resulted in higher flocculation potential. Here, the bridging mechanism operates which involves binding or bridging individual particles. Poly(acrylic acid) has stronger bridging mechanism than carrageenan. By forming good flocks, the flocculation potential of carrageenan was improved. By grafting of poly(acrylic acid) onto carrageenan, efficient flocculants were obtained, and they might be used for the treatment of coal waste water.Figure 5
Effect of polymer dosage on turbidity for coking coal and non-coking coal (shown with *).


### 3.4. Mechanism

A mechanism has been proposed for the reaction containing carrageenan, acrylic acid, hydrogen ion, mercaptosuccinic acid, and peroxymonosulphate. It was observed that potassium peroxymonosulphate is not able to produce grafted copolymer alone. Hence,R∙ free radicals are generated by the interaction of peroxymonosulphate and mercaptosuccinic acid. These free radicals abstract hydrogen atoms from the carrageenan molecule producing carrageenan macroradicals. The monomer radicals which are at the close proximity of the reaction sites become acceptors of the carrageenan radicals, resulting in chain initiation, and thereafter, themselves become free radical donors to neighbouring molecules to give grafted chain. These grafted chains are terminated by coupling to give grafted copolymer.


### 3.5. Thermal Analysis

#### 3.5.1. Carrageenan

Figure6 presents the thermograms of carrageenan, which revealed that decomposition of carrageenan had a two-step degradation process. The 18% weight loss at 100°C might be due to the loss of absorbed water. It started to degrade at 200–240°C. The polymer decomposition temperature (PDT) was found to be 125°C. The rate of weight loss increased with the increase in temperature from 125°C to 240°C and thereafter decreased and attained a maximum value at about 230°C. Tmax, temperature at which maximum degradation occurred, was 230°C. The final decomposition temperature (FDT) and integral procedural decomposition temperature (IPDT) were found to be 800°C and 305°C, respectively.Figure 6
Thermal curves of TGA, DTG, and DTA of pure carrageenan.


### 3.6. Acrylic Acid-g-Carrageenan

Thermogram of acrylic acid-g-carrageenan (Figure7) showed a two-step degradation process. Acrylic acid-g-carrageenan started to degrade at about 150°C; however, 4% weight loss was observed around 100°C, which was due to the absorbed water. The rate of weight loss was very slow up to 730°C. Only 25% weight loss was observed up to this temperature, while pure substrate degraded by almost 80% at 700°C, but after 730°C, acrylic acid-g-carrageenan degraded rapidly (Figure 7). The maximum weight loss (Tmax) appeared at two temperatures, that is, 251°C and 819°C. And PDT, FDT, and IPDT of acrylic acid-g-carrageenan were found to be 180°C, 825°C, and 376.93°C, respectively. The PDT and FDT indicated that grafting of acrylic acid increased the initial decomposition temperature by 55°C while increasing the final decomposition temperature by 20°C than that of carrageenan. The higher values of FDT, IPDT, and char yield of grafted carrageenan compared to those of carrageenan indicated an overall improvement in thermal stability of the grafted copolymer.Figure 7
Thermal curves of TGA, DTG, and DTA of acrylic acid-g-carrageenan.


## 3.1. FTIR Analysis

The FTIR spectrum of acrylic acid-g-carrageenan showed the peaks of poly(acrylic acid) as well as carrageenan (Figure2). The following additional peaks/bands in the spectrum of acrylic acids-g-carrageenan were observed. The broad band of the hydrogen bonding with carboxylic group –OH stretching disappeared from the region 3000–3500 cm−1 in graft copolymer spectrum, while the band at 2730–3050 cm−1 is attributed to stretching vibration of nonhydrogen bonded OH stretching. This suggests that the polymeric network is arranged in such a way that the possibility of hydrogen bonding is diminished. The peak at 1740 cm−1 is attributed to stretching vibration of carbonyl group of acrylic acid. The broad and intense bands centered at 1240 cm−1 and 1450 cm−1 are attributed to C–O stretching and C–O–H bending vibrations. The presence of these bands/peaks confirms the grafting of poly(acrylic acid) onto carrageenan backbone. Thus, the presence of these bands and disappearance of O–H bending vibration in the spectrum of carrageenan prove that acrylic acid was grafted onto O–H site of the carrageenan macromolecule.Figure 2
FTIR spectra of acrylic acid, carrageenan, and acrylic acid-g-carrageenan.


## 3.2. UV Analysis

Figure3 shows UV visible spectra of acrylic acid and carrageenan-g-acrylic acid in the region 200 to 400 nm. UV-visible spectrum of carrageenan shows the sharp peak at 223 nm and a broad shoulder between 300 and 340 nm, while no absorption has been seen in the spectrum of acrylic acid. The spectrum of carrageenan-g-acrylic acid clearly indicates the incorporation of the above peak in the graft copolymer with major shift of the peak appeared at 223 nm to 280 nm and shoulder between 340 and 403 nm. These peaks and shoulders are due to carbonyl chromophore of acrylic acid, which confirms the grafting of acrylic acid onto carrageenan.Figure 3
UV-visible spectra of acrylic acid-g-carrageenan and carrageenan.


## 3.3. Studies on Properties

### 3.3.1. Swelling Studies

The effect of swelling behavior on grafting ratio was studied by varying the concentration of acrylic acid from 8.0 to24.0×10-2 mol dm−3 (Table 1). It was observed that percent swelling and swelling ratio of the grafted copolymer increase with increasing the grafting ratio. This is due to the hydrophilic nature of acrylic acid. The increase in percentage of poly (acrylic acid) chain on to carrageenan provides more hydrophilicity to graft copolymer thereby increases in percent swelling and swelling ratio were observed.


### 3.3.2. Resistance to Biodegradation

If two polymers have a similar molecular weight, a branched polymer’s hydrodynamic volume will be lower, and hence it will have a lower viscosity than the linear polymer. It was observed that relative viscosity of acrylic acid-g-carrageenan is lower than the carrageenan (Figure4). This might be due to the presence of grafted chains, which make the molecule more flexible and reduce the viscosity drastically [37]. Initially up to 40 hours, viscosity of the grafted copolymer solution was increased that was due the swelling nature of polyacrylic acid chains, which absorbs water resulting in swelling in grafted copolymer. Carrageenan, like other polysaccharide solutions, is highly prone to biodegradation, and it was found that its solution after 70 h of preparation started to degrade, and after 10 days, the solution showed considerable loss of viscosity (Figure 4). The graft copolymer solution was subjected to the same type of study for biodegradation, and it was observed that graft copolymer solution showed no loss of viscosity up to 10 days (Figure 4). These results show that the grafted copolymer is less susceptible to biodegradation, and similar results were reported by others [37] also. This is in agreement with the fact that by incorporating relatively poly(acrylic acid) chains onto carrageenan, the carrageenan can be made less susceptible to bacterial attack [38]. Thus, it can be concluded that, by incorporation of poly(acrylic acid) onto carrageenan through graft copolymerization, the resistance to biodegradation of carrageenan can be improved.Figure 4
Relative viscosity of pure carrageenan and acrylic acid-g-carrageenan as a function of time.


### 3.3.3. Metal Ion Sorption: Removal of Hazardous Metal Ions

Hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance and nature of monomer are major factors that affect the metal ion uptake [39]. These functionalities can be tailored and incorporated by grafting to retain metal ions by polymer analogous reaction or by simple chelation absorption due to the opening of polymer matrix or pores created. Out of these possibilities, all may contribute in the metal ion sorption, although the extent of contribution of possibilities may vary [40]. However, functional group incorporated with the help of grafting by its ability to interact with metal ions may play more important role in determination of selectivity and quantum of metal ion absorption [41]. Five metal ions were chosen (Cu2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, Pb2+, and Hg2+) for the study of metal ion sorption. The amount of metal ion absorption was calculated by titrating the unabsorbed metal ions. The increases in the values of Pu, Kd, and Qr up to 380%G (Table 2) might have been caused by the increase in poly(acrylic acid) chains, which accounts for the higher absorption of these divalent cations through a chelating reaction [42]. The highest percent ion uptake was found for Copper ions, while the lowest percent ion uptake was for mercury ions. The decreases in the values of Pu, Kd, and Qr when the grafting ratio was higher than 380 are due to the increase in viscosity of the medium.


### 3.3.4. Flocculation Behaviour

Flocculation efficiencies of carrageenan backbone and its poly(acrylic acid) grafted copolymer were measured by the turbidity value of the supernatant liquid. Plots of polymer dosage versus supernatant turbidity for coking and noncoking coals are presented in Figure5. It was found that grafted copolymer showed better performance with low turbidity than the pure substrate. In the grafted copolymer, the hanging of poly(acrylic acid) chains led to better accessibility to the contaminant coal particles and hence resulted in higher flocculation potential. Here, the bridging mechanism operates which involves binding or bridging individual particles. Poly(acrylic acid) has stronger bridging mechanism than carrageenan. By forming good flocks, the flocculation potential of carrageenan was improved. By grafting of poly(acrylic acid) onto carrageenan, efficient flocculants were obtained, and they might be used for the treatment of coal waste water.Figure 5
Effect of polymer dosage on turbidity for coking coal and non-coking coal (shown with *).


## 3.3.1. Swelling Studies

The effect of swelling behavior on grafting ratio was studied by varying the concentration of acrylic acid from 8.0 to24.0×10-2 mol dm−3 (Table 1). It was observed that percent swelling and swelling ratio of the grafted copolymer increase with increasing the grafting ratio. This is due to the hydrophilic nature of acrylic acid. The increase in percentage of poly (acrylic acid) chain on to carrageenan provides more hydrophilicity to graft copolymer thereby increases in percent swelling and swelling ratio were observed.


## 3.3.2. Resistance to Biodegradation

If two polymers have a similar molecular weight, a branched polymer’s hydrodynamic volume will be lower, and hence it will have a lower viscosity than the linear polymer. It was observed that relative viscosity of acrylic acid-g-carrageenan is lower than the carrageenan (Figure4). This might be due to the presence of grafted chains, which make the molecule more flexible and reduce the viscosity drastically [37]. Initially up to 40 hours, viscosity of the grafted copolymer solution was increased that was due the swelling nature of polyacrylic acid chains, which absorbs water resulting in swelling in grafted copolymer. Carrageenan, like other polysaccharide solutions, is highly prone to biodegradation, and it was found that its solution after 70 h of preparation started to degrade, and after 10 days, the solution showed considerable loss of viscosity (Figure 4). The graft copolymer solution was subjected to the same type of study for biodegradation, and it was observed that graft copolymer solution showed no loss of viscosity up to 10 days (Figure 4). These results show that the grafted copolymer is less susceptible to biodegradation, and similar results were reported by others [37] also. This is in agreement with the fact that by incorporating relatively poly(acrylic acid) chains onto carrageenan, the carrageenan can be made less susceptible to bacterial attack [38]. Thus, it can be concluded that, by incorporation of poly(acrylic acid) onto carrageenan through graft copolymerization, the resistance to biodegradation of carrageenan can be improved.Figure 4
Relative viscosity of pure carrageenan and acrylic acid-g-carrageenan as a function of time.


## 3.3.3. Metal Ion Sorption: Removal of Hazardous Metal Ions

Hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance and nature of monomer are major factors that affect the metal ion uptake [39]. These functionalities can be tailored and incorporated by grafting to retain metal ions by polymer analogous reaction or by simple chelation absorption due to the opening of polymer matrix or pores created. Out of these possibilities, all may contribute in the metal ion sorption, although the extent of contribution of possibilities may vary [40]. However, functional group incorporated with the help of grafting by its ability to interact with metal ions may play more important role in determination of selectivity and quantum of metal ion absorption [41]. Five metal ions were chosen (Cu2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, Pb2+, and Hg2+) for the study of metal ion sorption. The amount of metal ion absorption was calculated by titrating the unabsorbed metal ions. The increases in the values of Pu, Kd, and Qr up to 380%G (Table 2) might have been caused by the increase in poly(acrylic acid) chains, which accounts for the higher absorption of these divalent cations through a chelating reaction [42]. The highest percent ion uptake was found for Copper ions, while the lowest percent ion uptake was for mercury ions. The decreases in the values of Pu, Kd, and Qr when the grafting ratio was higher than 380 are due to the increase in viscosity of the medium.


## 3.3.4. Flocculation Behaviour

Flocculation efficiencies of carrageenan backbone and its poly(acrylic acid) grafted copolymer were measured by the turbidity value of the supernatant liquid. Plots of polymer dosage versus supernatant turbidity for coking and noncoking coals are presented in Figure5. It was found that grafted copolymer showed better performance with low turbidity than the pure substrate. In the grafted copolymer, the hanging of poly(acrylic acid) chains led to better accessibility to the contaminant coal particles and hence resulted in higher flocculation potential. Here, the bridging mechanism operates which involves binding or bridging individual particles. Poly(acrylic acid) has stronger bridging mechanism than carrageenan. By forming good flocks, the flocculation potential of carrageenan was improved. By grafting of poly(acrylic acid) onto carrageenan, efficient flocculants were obtained, and they might be used for the treatment of coal waste water.Figure 5
Effect of polymer dosage on turbidity for coking coal and non-coking coal (shown with *).


## 3.4. Mechanism

A mechanism has been proposed for the reaction containing carrageenan, acrylic acid, hydrogen ion, mercaptosuccinic acid, and peroxymonosulphate. It was observed that potassium peroxymonosulphate is not able to produce grafted copolymer alone. Hence,R∙ free radicals are generated by the interaction of peroxymonosulphate and mercaptosuccinic acid. These free radicals abstract hydrogen atoms from the carrageenan molecule producing carrageenan macroradicals. The monomer radicals which are at the close proximity of the reaction sites become acceptors of the carrageenan radicals, resulting in chain initiation, and thereafter, themselves become free radical donors to neighbouring molecules to give grafted chain. These grafted chains are terminated by coupling to give grafted copolymer.


## 3.5. Thermal Analysis

### 3.5.1. Carrageenan

Figure6 presents the thermograms of carrageenan, which revealed that decomposition of carrageenan had a two-step degradation process. The 18% weight loss at 100°C might be due to the loss of absorbed water. It started to degrade at 200–240°C. The polymer decomposition temperature (PDT) was found to be 125°C. The rate of weight loss increased with the increase in temperature from 125°C to 240°C and thereafter decreased and attained a maximum value at about 230°C. Tmax, temperature at which maximum degradation occurred, was 230°C. The final decomposition temperature (FDT) and integral procedural decomposition temperature (IPDT) were found to be 800°C and 305°C, respectively.Figure 6
Thermal curves of TGA, DTG, and DTA of pure carrageenan.


## 3.5.1. Carrageenan

Figure6 presents the thermograms of carrageenan, which revealed that decomposition of carrageenan had a two-step degradation process. The 18% weight loss at 100°C might be due to the loss of absorbed water. It started to degrade at 200–240°C. The polymer decomposition temperature (PDT) was found to be 125°C. The rate of weight loss increased with the increase in temperature from 125°C to 240°C and thereafter decreased and attained a maximum value at about 230°C. Tmax, temperature at which maximum degradation occurred, was 230°C. The final decomposition temperature (FDT) and integral procedural decomposition temperature (IPDT) were found to be 800°C and 305°C, respectively.Figure 6
Thermal curves of TGA, DTG, and DTA of pure carrageenan.


## 3.6. Acrylic Acid-g-Carrageenan

Thermogram of acrylic acid-g-carrageenan (Figure7) showed a two-step degradation process. Acrylic acid-g-carrageenan started to degrade at about 150°C; however, 4% weight loss was observed around 100°C, which was due to the absorbed water. The rate of weight loss was very slow up to 730°C. Only 25% weight loss was observed up to this temperature, while pure substrate degraded by almost 80% at 700°C, but after 730°C, acrylic acid-g-carrageenan degraded rapidly (Figure 7). The maximum weight loss (Tmax) appeared at two temperatures, that is, 251°C and 819°C. And PDT, FDT, and IPDT of acrylic acid-g-carrageenan were found to be 180°C, 825°C, and 376.93°C, respectively. The PDT and FDT indicated that grafting of acrylic acid increased the initial decomposition temperature by 55°C while increasing the final decomposition temperature by 20°C than that of carrageenan. The higher values of FDT, IPDT, and char yield of grafted carrageenan compared to those of carrageenan indicated an overall improvement in thermal stability of the grafted copolymer.Figure 7
Thermal curves of TGA, DTG, and DTA of acrylic acid-g-carrageenan.


## 4. Conclusion

The successful synthesis of high grafting ratio for the grafted copolymer was achieved. Grafted copolymer showed very good water swelling ability and resistance to biodegradation. Grafting is further supported by enhanced properties like metal ion uptake and flocculation efficiency. The thermal analysis data showed that the grafted copolymer was more thermally stable than the ungrafted polymer because of the higher final decomposition temperature and integral procedural decomposition temperature for the grafted copolymer as compared to substrate.



---

*Source: 892615-2013-06-11.xml*