# Pulsar-Driven Jets in Supernovae, Gamma-Ray Bursts, and the Universe

Authors: John Middleditch
Journal: Advances in Astronomy
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

The bipolarity of Supernova 1987A can be understood through its very early light curve  from the CTIO 0.4 m telescope and IUE FES and following speckle observations of the “Mystery Spot”. These indicate a beam/jet of light/particles, with initial collimation factors  >104 and velocities >0.95 c, involving up to 10−5 M⊙ interacting with circumstellar material. These can be produced by a model of pulsar emission from polarization currents induced/(modulated faster than c) beyond the pulsar light cylinder by the periodic electromagnetic field (supraluminally induced polarization currents (SLIP)). SLIP accounts for the disruption of supernova progenitors and their anomalous dimming at cosmological distances, jets from Sco X-1 and SS 433, the lack/presence of pulsations from the high-/low-luminosity low-mass X-ray binaries, and long/short gamma-ray bursts, and it predicts that their afterglows are the pulsed optical-/near-infrared emission associated with these pulsars. SLIP may also account for the TeV e+/e− results from PAMELA and ATIC, the WMAP “Haze”/Fermi “Bubbles,” and the r-process. SLIP jets from SNe of the first stars may allow galaxies to form without dark matter and explain the peculiar nongravitational motions between pairs of distant galaxies observed by GALEX.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Supernova 1987A has provided astronomers with a wealth of data, some of which have not even now, a quarter century after the event, been satisfactorily accounted for by any model. One of the most remarkable features in the early study of SN 1987A was the “Mystery Spot,” with a thermal energy of1049 erg, observed 50 days after the core-collapse event [1–3] and separated from the SN photosphere “proper” by 0.060±0.008 arc s at day 38 (Figure 1), with about 3% of this energy eventually radiated in the optical band. The possibility that the enormous energy implied for the Mystery Spot might somehow link it to gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) attracted little serious consideration at the time, or even since, beyond a very astute few [4–6]. The Mystery Spot was also observed at separations of 0.045±0.008 arc s on day 30 and 0.074±0.008 arc s on day 50 but always at an angle of 194°, consistent with the southern (and approaching) extension of the bipolarity [7]. The Mystery Spot offsets from SN 1987A imply a minimum projected separation of ~10 light-days (ℓt-d).Figure 1
Measurements of displacement (lower) and observed magnitude (upper) of the “Mystery Spot” from SN 1987A, at Hα and 533 nm, versus time, from [1–3].There is also a wealth of photometric and spectroscopic data from even earlier stages of SN 1987A, in particular photometry data from the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO) 0.4 m telescope [8] and the fine error sensor (FES) of the International Ultraviolet Explorer (IUE [9]), and spectroscopic data from [10, 11], among others. Short timescale structure (≤1 d) in this data, following finite delays (~10 d) after SN 1987A core collapse, implies at least one beam of light and jet particles which were initially highly collimated (>104), interacting with circumstellar material.GRBs, particularly long soft GRBs (ℓGRBs), appear to be the most luminous events in the Universe, occurring at the SN rate of one per second (assuming a collimation factor near 105), yet we still know very little about them (see, e.g., [12] and references therein). A few ℓGRBs have been found to be associated with SNe [13–15]. Others however, mostly those with slightly harder spectra and lasting only ~1 second (sGRBs), usually produce no lingering evidence at all, and only rarely the “afterglows” observed for a large proportion of ℓGRBs, sometimes extending down to radio wavelengths. A large number of models have been put forth to explain GRBs, including neutron star-neutron star mergers for sGRBs, and exotic objects such as “collapsars” [16] for ℓGRBs. Part of the physical motivation for these, and the nearly universal use of their usually severe degrees of collimation, is the enormous energy of up to 1054 erg implied for an isotropic source. Indeed, the data from SN 1987A presented herein, when interpreted through the model discussed in detail within this work, support a beam/jet collimation factor >104 in producing its early light curve by interaction with more or less stationary circumstellar material.  In addition, the model predicts  that GRB afterglows, and by extension of the principles of supraluminal excitations, even GRBs themselves, may dim only as distance-1   (see Section 4), and thus easily removes the requirement for such a high energy.Specifically, this work argues that polarization currents induced beyond the light cylinders of, and by the rotating magnetic fields from, newly formed pulsars embedded within their stellar remnants [17, 18] can account for the bipolarity of SN 1987A [19–21]. This model of emission from supraluminally induced polarization currents (SLIPs) provides a mechanism for generating a pulsed beam, rotating on the surface of a cone whose half angle (and angle from the pulsar axis of rotation) is given by
(1)θV=arcsincv,
for astronomical distances. Here, c is the speed of light and v>c is the speed at which the polarization currents are updated, that is, v=ωR, where ω is the pulsar rotation frequency in radians s-1, R>RLC is the distance of the polarization current from the pulsar projected onto the rotational equatorial plane, and RLC is the light cylinder radius (ωRLC=c).Emission from circularly supraluminal polarization currents is initially focused as a single point, which moves around the equator of the light cylinder at the angular pulsar rate, but which eventually travels outward on the two cones defined by (1). When the emission is observed for the conal directions, the pulse profile will consist of only a single sharp peak and will have an intensity that decays only with the first power of distance [22, 23] (see Section 4)1.This emission mechanism, and its unusual distance law, will operate atany radius beyond the light cylinder where sufficient plasma exists. In principle, this would render pulsations nearly always visible from neutron stars surrounded by plasma. However, pulsations are almost never seen from neutron stars which are born inside of SNe with M⊙’s of material yet to eject, and those in the nontransient (and more luminous) low-mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs). What happens is that emissions from smaller annuli must push out through the densest material of the stellar core or circumpulsar accretia, while emissions from larger annuli, although encountering more material on the way to the equatorial light cylinder, also bypass much of the core material while traveling toward the poles. This results in a greater beam concentration near the rotational poles, and thus, the solid angle for which pulsations are observable from SNe and LMXBs is tiny and is almost never expected to be seen (an SN Ic, however, is worth observing—see Section 5). In the case of SNe, the beam accelerates (and transmutes) matter from the stellar interior, which includes H, He, C, O, and heavier elements for massive solitary progenitor stars.In the rest of this paper, Section2 includes a quantitative discussion of the SN 1987A early luminosity history and motivations for why a later quasisteady less collimated, as well as a prompt highly collimated injection events are needed. Then Section 3 estimates the kinematics and the working geometry for the 1987A beam/jet and Mystery Spot, and we explore the implications of these on the process which gave rise to SN 1987A and the observations during the following years. Section 4 relates the SN 1987A beam/jet process to GRBs, germinates the idea that their afterglows are highly pulsed,2 and introduces the possibility that 1987A itself was the result of a merger of two electron degenerate stellar cores within a common envelope—double degenerate, or DD—while Section 5 relates the process to Type Ia/c SNe. Section 6, including Sections 6.1–6.5, extends the discussion of the implications of the DD process to the formation and luminosities of Type Ib and II SNe, the relation of plasma available to the SLIP process and transient signals (Section 6.2), Sco X-1 and other low-mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs, Section 6.3), historic SNe, pulse profiles, and SNR bipolarity (Section 6.5). Section 6.6 discusses how SLIP explains why PSR J0537 is predominantly an X-ray but not an optical pulsar. Section 6.7 discusses the high kinetic energy of the SN 1987A jet(s) and its possible relation to the positron excess, WMAP “Haze”, Fermi “Bubbles”, and r-process, followed by a discussion of the unique SS 433 jets in Section 6.8, pulsar-driven jets in the early Universe in Section 6.9, and pulsar “recycling” in Section 6.10. Section 7 concludes, and a short SLIP primer follows in the appendix.


## 2. The Early Luminosity History of SN 1987A

Table1 gives an event history for SN 1987A and its progenitor system. An approximate geometry for SN 1987A and a Mystery Spot located within circumstellar material (in this case, polar ejecta) are given in Figure 2, while the early luminosity histories of SN 1987A from CTIO and the fine error sensor (FES) of the IUE, which we can use to refine the parameters that this figure postulates as reflecting reality, are both plotted in Figure 3.3Table 1
SN 1987A Event Log.
Timet
Event
−20,000 years
Rings formed
~(−2,000?) years
Polar, or near-polar ejection
0 (= UT 1987, Feb. 23.316)
Core-collapse of SN 1987A
0
<
t
<
2 days
UV flash from SN 1987A
2
<
t
<
4 days
Emergence of luminous jet
4
<
t
<
7 days
Cooling/spreading of jet
7.8 days
UV flash hits polar ejecta
8.26 days
Jet impacts polar ejecta (PE)
19.8 days
Pulsations clear through PE
20.8 days
Jet particles clear through PE
30 days
“Mystery spot” at 45 mas
38 days
“Mystery spot” at 60 mas
50 days
“Mystery spot” at 74 masFigure 2
The geometry of the “Mystery Spot,” (red dot) polar ejecta, associated beam/jet, and direct line of sight from SN 1987A to the Earth.Figure 3
The very early luminosity history of SN 1987A as observed with the fine error sensor of IUE and the 0.41-m at CTIO. Data points taken at Goddard Space Flight Center by Sonneborn & Kirshner, and at the Villafranca Station in Madrid, are marked (see Section2). The diameter of the circles representing the CTIO data is about three times the error. A V magnitude scale, for excess light above the minimum near day 7, is given, within the frame, on the right.Following the drop from the initial flash, the luminosity rises again to a maximum (“A” in Figures3 and 4(a)) of magnitude 4.35 at day 3.0, roughly corresponding to 2.7×1041 erg s-1 and interpretable as a luminous jet emerging from cooler outer layers which initially shrouded it. This declines to magnitude 4.48 around day 7.0 (“B”, Figure 4(b)), interpretable as free-free cooling or the loss of the ability to cool, as the jet becomes more diffuse. The next observable event should be the scattering/reprocessing of the initial UV flash in the polar ejecta at day ~8, and indeed, “C” (Figure 4(c)) shows ~2 ×1039 erg s-1 in the optical for a day at day 7.8, and a decline consistent with the flash after that, indicating that no significant smearing over time had occurred in this interaction. The 8-day delay to, and the rapid decline of, this first event implies a collimation factor >104 for this part of the UV flash. This can be seen if we let δ represent the radius of the illuminated area in the polar ejecta, d as in Figure 2 is the distance from the SN to this area, the collimation factor ϒ for the beam can be expressed as
(2)ϒ=2π(dδ)2,
or
(3)ϒ=104(d10ℓt-d)2(δ0.25ℓt-d)-2.The geometry of the 1987A-glowing beam/jet, initially opaque shroud, and UV flash (which may have an enhanced beam of its own in the jet direction here75°, down and to the right). The maximum velocity of the jet/shroud is 0.95/0.55 c. The dashed line to the upper scale flags the center of the emerging jet at day 3.3 ((a)—A) and day 6 ((b)—B), and the UV flash hitting the polar ejecta at day 7.8 ((c)—C).
(a)
(b)
(c)A linear ramp in luminosity, visible by day 9.8 (“D” in Figures3 and 5(a)), indicates particles from the jet penetrating into the polar ejecta, with the fastest traveling at >0.8 c, and because of the sudden rise, a particle collimation factor >104. Back extrapolation of the three CTIO points just after day 8 intersects the day 7 minimum near day 8.26, which would indicate that particles exist in this jet with velocities up to 0.95 c, and even higher if the true minimum flux is lower than the points at magnitude 4.48 (1.6×1041 erg s-1) near day 7.((a)—D). The intense center (~1°) of the jet begins to produce light as it penetrates into the polar ejecta, producing the jump in luminosity at day 9.8. ((b)—E) Particles in the jet continue to impact the polar ejecta (mostly hidden), extending the ramp in luminosity visible in Figure3 near day 20 (left dashed line to the top scale). Right dashed line: light from the filtered UV flash scatters in clumpy polar ejecta near its outer boundary. ((c)—F) The fastest jet particles have cleared the end of the polar ejecta.
(a)
(b)
(c)The ramp continues until after day 20, when a decrement of ~5×1039 erg s-1 appears in both data sets just after day 20 (“F” in Figures 3 and 5(c)). The CTIO point just before the decrement can be used as a rough upper limit for the Mystery Spot luminosity and corresponds to an excess above the minimum (near day 7.0) of 5×1040 erg s-1, or magnitude 5.8, the same as that observed in Hα for the Mystery Spot at days 30, 38, and 50, about 23% of the total optical flux of 2.1×1041 erg s-1 at that time.This decrement is preceded by aspike (“E” in Figures 3 and 5(b), and Figure 6, day 19.8) of up to 1040 erg s-1 in the CTIO data, with the unusual colors of B, R, and I, in ascending order, very close to the B and I bands speculated for the 2.14 ms signature observed from 1987A [24, 25] with an Hα enhancement. Spectra taken by [25] around March 15 (the “Bochum event”) [10] on March 14.820 (day 19.504), and [11] on UT 1987, March 15.08 (day 19.76), support these flux enhancements, including the Hα (and a Ca II triplet, λλ 849.8, 854.2, 866.2 nm, as well). The timing of this event, one day prior to the decrement, suggests that it is due to a photon stream, stripped of its UV component by absorption (the CTIO U point at day 19.8 was low, consistent with this interpretation), scattering into other directions, including the line of sight to the Earth, by what might have been a clumpy end to the circumstellar material. Optical pulsations were not detected at this early epoch (R. N. Manchester, private communication 2007) because of the oblique view and the dimensions of the beam (~1 ℓt-d).Figure 6
The U, B, V, R, and I points from the CTIO 0.41-m from days 6 to 50 (see Section2).For the geometry derived in Section3 below, the one-day delay implies at least the same maximum jet velocity (0.95c), supporting this interpretation of a beam and jet penetrating extrastellar material and giving us a rough isotropic lower-limit estimate of the strength of the pulsations. Spectra taken just before day 5, showing an enhancement for wavelengths below 5000 Å, explain the discrepancy between the CTIO and FES points at that time (Figure 3).In spite of the coincidence between the end magnitude of the linear ramp and that of the Mystery Spot, the two are probably not of the same effect, as the offset of the Mystery Spot from SN 1987A was only 0.045 arc s even 10 days later at day 30 (Figure7), a location barely beyond where the ramp began, as is shown below, and there is no sign of elongation toward SN 1987A proper in Figure 1 of [3] or Figure 2 of [2]. The Mystery Spot may develop as a plume within the polar ejecta, pushed by a less collimated 0.5c pulsar wind, perhaps not unlike that observed from the Crab pulsar [26], many days after the passage of the initial, very fast, very collimated component of the jet. A beam only 1 ℓt-d across at ~10 ℓt-d translates via (1) into plasma at ~20RLC.Figure 7
The relation of the Mystery Spot, near day 30, to a jet, a thinning shroud, and a UV Flash, when its projected offset from SN 1987A was 0.045 arc s.It is unlikely that the early light curve is due to shallow penetration of a precessing jet into a varying entry point of the polar ejecta because the high density required to limit jet penetration comes with a higher opacity which would make the linear ramp hard to produce in this, the inner boundary of the approaching axial feature. The requirement for an 0.5 c mean motion of the Mystery Spot between days 30 and 38, slowing to 0.35 c between days 38 and 50 (ostensibly due to sweptup matter), would also be difficult to fulfill in these circumstances. On the other hand, the polar ejecta density cannot be so low as to allow more than 1ℓt-d penetration by the enhanced UV flash, or the drop in luminosity from day 7.8 to day 8.8 would not be as big. If the jet penetration is deep, precession and/or changes in the plasma density beyond the pulsar light cylinder (1) may make its initial track, within the polar ejecta, a helical cone, and this may assist the ~0.5c wind in the creation of the plume which forms the Mystery Spot within three weeks of the initial jet penetration.We will assume that the optical flux from the interaction between jet particles and the polar ejecta will not be significantly occulted in the ejecta itself in the direction to the Earth, otherwise again, the linear ramp would be difficult to produce. As we will find below that the axis of the SN 1987A bipolarity is ~30° from the normal to the ring planes, the reason is remaining a mystery even today, this is not necessarily a given. Proceeding nevertheless is as follows. By scaling homologously inward a factor of 10 from the equatorial ring density of 104 cm-3, we arrive at a polar ejecta density estimate of ~107 cm-3—sufficient to stop the UV flash from penetrating >1 ℓt-d.Assuming a polar ejecta depth,D, of ~10 ℓt-d, or 2.6×1016 cm, gives a total column of 2.6×1023cm-2, sufficient to hopelessly disperse any pulsed radio signature, though enough to warrant some concerns about continued particle penetration. However, only a fraction of the protons in the jet will scatter through the entire depth of the polar ejecta (the slight concave downward departure from linearity most apparent in the CTIO data, between days 9 and 20, may reflect this loss, and/or the density in the polar ejecta may decrease with distance). In addition, we will find that the angle, θ, from our line of sight to the SN 1987A beam/jet will be large in the self-consistent solution, justifying our assumption of visibility for the luminous column within the polar ejecta between days 9 and 20.


## 3. The Geometry and Kinematics of the Beam/Jet

Using the constraints shown in Figures1 and 3, we can solve for the three geometric variables, d, D, and θ (diagrammed in Figure 2), and the maximum velocity of the particles in the jet, β. First, the UV flash hits the beginning of the polar ejecta at day 7.8 as follows:
(4)d(1-cosθ)=ct0==7.8ℓt-d,
where d is the distance to the beginning of the polar ejecta, θ is the angle from the beam/jet/polar ejecta direction to the line of sight to the Earth, and c is the speed of light.From Figure3, we also have the jet particles well into the polar ejecta by day 9.8. Extrapolating the three CTIO points (just after day 8) backward per above, we have the fastest beam particles hitting the polar ejecta at day 8.26 as follows:
(5)d(1β-cosθ)=ct1==8.26ℓt-d.
Next, we have the projected offset of 0.060 arc s for the Mystery Spot measured at day 29.8 by [2] and refined by [3]. This is more difficult to pin down relative to its position radially through the polar ejecta, so we assume it is some fraction, α, of the way through the polar ejecta depth, D, and derive a self-consistent solution as follows:
(6)(d+αD)sinθ=ct2==17.3ℓt-d,
using 50 kpc for the distance to SN 1987A. Finally, we have the decrement in the light curve at day 20, shown in Figure 3, which we will interpret as the fastest “substantial” bunch of particles in the jet breaking through the end of the polar ejecta as follows:
(7)(d+D)(1β-cosθ)=ct3==20ℓt-d.The solution to (4)–(7) gives a constant ratio for D to d, independent of α as follows:
(8)d=Dt1(t3-t1),or(d+D)=dt3t1,
while θ is given by
(9)θ=2tan-1{t0t2(α(t3t1-1)+1)}.
The parameters, d, D+d, and θ, are plotted against β in Figure 8 for 0.3≤α≤0.7, along with the maximum d and minimum D+d implied by the three measurements of the Mystery Spot angular separation at days 30, 38, and 50. Figure 8 shows that the polar ejecta, at the very least, must start by 14 ℓt-d or closer and extend to 22 ℓt-d or farther, consistent with our early 10 ℓt-d estimates for d and D as is the high value of θ (65°<θ<85°), which also means that the axis of bipolarity is ~30° from the normal to the ring planes [27].Figure 8
The solution values for (4)–(7). Horizontal: the maximum jet velocity, β. Left vertical: the maximum range of the polar ejecta. Right vertical axis: the distance from the pulsar to the beginning of the polar ejecta. The line with the steepest slope converts β (bottom) to D+d (left) or d (right), and three values for θ are marked. The three other lines with moderate slopes constrain the minimum of D+d (right end of 74 mas curve) and the maximum of d (left end of the 45 mas curve and also read on the left vertical axis) from offset measurements of the Mystery Spot, which is assumed to be a jet-driven plume within the polar ejecta. Five values of α, from 0.3 to 0.7, are tic-marked on the four curves.Given the similar magnitudes of the early light curve and the Mystery Spot (and indeed, the two are just phases of the same jet phenomenon; the first being more penetrating and the second more energy injecting), the energetics of the jet producing the early light curve and these are the same as that posited for the Mystery Spot in [1], except that the early light-curve phase is shorter. For an interval of 106 s, at 5×1040 erg s-1, the optical output, from reprocessing of X-rays resulting from the jet particles scattering with electrons, which then add to it through free-free or later synchrotron radiation, is 5×1046 erg. Since only a fraction of the particles scatter in the polar ejecta, the overall efficiency, in the conversion of kinetic energy into optical luminosity, could still be as low as Meikle et al.’s estimated 0.001, which gives 5×1049 erg of kinetic energy in the initial jet. For 0.9 c protons, each with 0.002 erg of kinetic energy, this would mean 2.5×1052 protons or 2×10-5M⊙ initially for each jet. Without the now visible counterjet, the “kick” velocity to the neutron star would only be 10 km s-1, thus such jets are unlikely to produce the 100 s of km s-1 velocities seen in a few other pulsars.For a pulsar with an initial spin rate of 500 Hz, this short phase alone would result in a drop of 10 Hz, corresponding to a mean spindown rate of10-5 Hz s-1, assuming a neutron-star moment of inertia of 5×1044g-cm2. This may still be an underestimate, as accelerating a square ℓt-d of the polar ejecta column, which amounts to ~0.002 M⊙ to ~0.3 c, requires 1.6×1050 erg of kinetic energy, which amounts to 6.6% of the 2.5×1051 erg of rotational energy of a 500 Hz pulsar for each jet, or ~66 Hz of frequency drop from 500 Hz, still assuminofg 100% conversion of jet kinetic energy into Mystery Spot kinetic energy, unless the plume has a smaller cross section than 1 ℓt-d2 and/or the polar ejecta is less dense, on average, than 107cm-3. Since these numbers account only for the near polar SLIP beam(s), and not to the more equatorial beams, they must be considered to be lower limits. Observations of initial pulsar spindowns (see Section 4) would help greatly in resolving this uncertainty. Spinup from accretion may temper the spindown somewhat [28], but gravitational radiation reaction may counter it [29], though the high electromagnetic spindown will mask any effect of this latter on the pulsar braking index, n, where (∂f/∂t)∝-fn, and n=5 for pure gravitational radiation.In either case, the rotational energy required is too large to be supplied by a strongly magnetized pulsar over the required timescale, unless these are born spinning faster than the moderate rates generally believed to be typical (e.g., the ~12 ms initial period for the 16.1 ms PSR J0537-6910 [30]—see Section 6.6). There was certainly no evidence for a strongly magnetized pulsar within SN 1987A in its first few years (e.g., [31–33]), and most importantly, there is no evidence for such a pulsar in the last few years [34], whereas SN 1986J, at the same age, showed clear evidence of such a pulsar within it.4However, there may be a weakly magnetized pulsar within SN 1987A [24, 35], and at the very least, this is supported by solid evidence for the at the very least this is supported by solid evidence for the formation of a neutron star [36, 37]. A binary merger of two electron-degenerate stellar cores (DD—in isolation, these would be white dwarfs) has been proposed for SN 1987A [38], and the triple ring structure, particularly that of the outer rings, has recently been successfully calculated within this framework [39]. Other details of SN 1987A, including the mixing [40], the blue supergiant progenitor [41], the early polarization [42–44], and the possible 2.14 ms optical pulsations [24, 35], support this hypothesis.The first clear evidence for DD-formed millisecond pulsars coincidentally came in the birth year of SN 1987A, with the discovery of the 3 ms pulsar, B1821-24 [45], in the noncore-collapsed globular cluster, M28. Subsequently, many more were found over the next 20 years in such clusters (e.g., 47 Tuc [46]), and attributing these to recycling through X-ray binaries has never really worked [47, 48], by a few orders of magnitude.5 Thus the DD process in SN 1987A, albeit within a common envelope, would likely have formed a rapidly spinning weakly magnetized pulsar.Consequently, we also argue, as a corollary implication useful for understanding the SN process and its modern-day observation history, that the vast majority of core-collapse events are similar to SN 1987A, in that they are a result of the DD process, producing only weakly magnetized rapidly spinning ms pulsars, the notable exceptions being SNe 1986J, and 2006gy and 2007bi; these latter will be discussed further below. In spite of the rarity of recent SNe with solid evidence for a strongly magnetized neutron star remnant, many still currently hold that such a result is the more frequent result of stellar core-collapse events.The above estimates for an early phase of drastic spindown are in line with the differences between the years-old spin period of the 2.14 ms (467 Hz) signature for SN 1987A of [24, 35] as a Population I pulsar,6 and the Population II pulsars with spin periods just over 2 ms, such as Ter 5 Y and V (2.05 and 2.07 ms, 488 Hz and 482.5 Hz) and 47 Tuc F (2.10 ms, 476 Hz). The pulsar, J0034-0534, has the next highest spin rate, at 532.7 Hz, a gap of 44.5 Hz. There are seven in the same frequency range below Ter 5 Y (not counting SN 1987A), lending credibility to the commonality of 2 ms for the birth periods for pulsars produced by DD merger.7 This would also explain how ms pulsars could be recycled to spin rates faster than 500 Hz [50], without requiring any decay of the magnetic field. The occurrence of pulsars with various spin frequencies shows an increased density for frequencies just under 500 Hz, consistent with this picture (see Figure 9). After a (significant) gap from 378 to 346 Hz, where there is only PSR J0024-7204S at 353.3 Hz, the pulsars slower than 346 Hz, the steepest part of the curve, comprise the “5 ms pileup,” that is, those pulsars (in part) possibly are the offspring of defunct LMXBs (discussed further in Section 6.10). The pulsars between 378 and 500 Hz are not numerous enough to populate the pileup just by spinning down, without resorting to entities such as age and beaming differences.Figure 9
The distribution of pulsars from the ATNF pulsar database with spin rates greater than 100 Hz (http://www.atnf.csiro.au; [49]).Table2 lists the anticipated emission and spindown phases of an SN/pulsar similar to 1987A. The epoch at which the common envelope transitions from bilobed to spheroidal is estimated at 2000 years prior to core collapse, at which time the spindown is dominated by SLIP losses to mass ejection/disruption of the progenitor star and thus is very high. The time range at which the losses transition from SLIP to gravitational radiation is estimated to be 2 to 4 years, after which GR losses are estimated to dominate for a century. At -2×10-10 Hz s-1, this amounts to a loss of ~0.6 Hz, which may be an overestimate, since the spindown may not sustain this rate over a century. Certainly the loss cannot amount to several dozens of Hz, as the resulting tight grouping of pulsars with spin periods near 2 ms would not happen. When the pulsar is about a decade old, there is not enough plasma left (barring occasional clumps) to sustain optical pulsations. Thus, the epoch of optical pulsations for SN 1987A started near 4 years of age, which is relatively late, due to the large angle between the spin axis inferred from the bipolarity and the line of sight to the Earth, some 75°.Table 2
15M⊙ DD-formed pulsar processes.
Process
Timespantmin<t<tmax
Bi-lobed to spheroidal CE
~−2,000? years
Chandrasekhar-mass WD formed
~−2? seconds
DD core-collapse to 2 ms pulsar
~−0.5<t<0.5? s
Gamma-ray burst (ℓGRB)
~0.5<t<  ~100? s
Pulsed GRB afterglow
~0.5s<t<1 day
Ejection spindown phase,θV≪1
0
<
t
<
2 years
Transition toθV~1
2
<
t
<
4 years
GR-dominated spindown
3
<
t
<
100? years
Broadly beamed pulsations
4
<
t
<
10 years
Plasma depleted
10
<
t
<
∞ years
Cas A-type thermal X-ray source
10
<
t
<
400 years
Magnetic dipole-dominated spindown
100
<
t
<
∞ yearsIn this case, plasma initially available at manyRLC resulted in axially driven pulsations. Precession and nutation may have further embellished the axial pattern [35]. A strongly magnetized pulsar, because it will be spinning more slowly than its weakly magnetized counterparts, will have a larger RLC and thus produce a much less collimated beam and jet than those of SN 1987A because plasma is available at far fewer RLC, but the larger progenitor counteracts this trend somewhat. As the 1987A circum neutron star density declined, polarization currents were restricted to fewer RLC, resulting in pulsed emission along a cone of finite polar angle, which may have modified the resulting jet into the approaching and retreating conical features now easily visible in the HST ACS images [7]. The high-velocity cloud, HVC A0 [51], may be an example of a pulsar-driven jet long separated from its progenitor.Eventually, as the plasma continued to thin with time, its maximum density just outside ofRLC, occurred between here and 2RLC, resulting, because of (1), in pulsations driven close to the pulsar’s rotational equator, and according to our self-consistent solution, in the line of sight to the Earth. Such a beam cannot possibly produce the observable excess luminosity that may have been seen by 1991 [52–54], as the amount of 57Co required to otherwise account for the excess (mV~17.4~275L⊙) was only barely consistent with hard X-ray and infrared spectral data [55, 56]. If we were in the cusp of the pulsar within SN 1987A during this epoch, because of the distance-1 law associated with this direction, the implied luminosity would have dropped from 10 L⊙ (roughly magnitude 21), by half the distance modulus to the LMC, some 9.4 magnitudes, or a factor of ~5,000 to ~0.002 L⊙. Moving from 10 pc to ~12 ℓt-d (0.01 pc), the likely distance to the equatorial band (velocity ~2,500 km s-1), the apparent luminosity falls by another factor of 1,000, far short of the required excess, and all possible other beams cannot possibly make any difference. Because our geometrical solution puts the pulsar behind the equatorial torus visible in ACS images taken years later, the excess luminosity may have been due to an accretion-powered X-ray flux, reprocessed within ejecta thinning with time.A few years earlier, it was unlikely that the 2.14 ms signal would have been detectable in the broadband, as limits established in early 1988 [31]are comparable to levels of the 2.14 ms signal observed in the I band between 1992, Feb. and 1993, Feb. The 2.14 ms pulsar candidate was last detected in 1996, Feb. [24], and by 2002 there was no evidence of any such source in ACS images, which only really means that any pulsar within SN 1987A had entered the “Cas A” phase,8 having exhausted its surrounding excess plasma and perhaps also because the Earth was no longer in the “cusp” of its beam(s). Still, the central source should turn on when the pulsar encounters matter from time to time. Thus, continued observations are warranted.


## 4. The SN 1987A Link to GRBs

Without (or perhaps even with) the H and He in the envelope of the progenitor of 1987A Sk-69°202, the collision of the jet with the 1987A polar ejecta (which produced the early light curve and Mystery Spot) might be indistinguishable from a full ℓGRB [6]; otherwise, it would just beg the question of what distant, on-axis such objects would look like. It is also the case that few or no ℓGRBs have been found in elliptical galaxies, and that the DD process must dominate (as always, through binary-binary collisions), by a large factor, the neutron star-neutron star mergers in these populations, even when requiring enough white-dwarf-white dwarf-merged mass to produce core collapse. All of these facts/realizations lead to the alternate conclusion that the DD process may produce sGRBs in the absence of common envelope and polar ejecta, the means by which they would otherwise become ℓGRBs. If the sGRBs in ellipticals are due to mergers of white dwarfs, we can conclude that (1) the pre common envelope/polar ejecta impact photon spectrum of ℓGRBs may be well characterized as those of sGRBs, (2) sGRBs are offset from the centers of their elliptical hosts possibly because they are white dwarf-white dwarf mergers to core-collapse in their hosts’ globular clusters (to produce most of their ms pulsars [57], and (3) neutron star-neutron star mergers may not make GRBs as we know them and/or be as common as previously thought. Thus, sGRBs, which last a few seconds [58], may not flag neutron star-neutron star mergers, which may last only a few ms, the same timescale as the 30-Jy, DM=375 radio burst [59].Supernova 1987A, with its beam and jet producing its early light curve and Mystery Spot, is therefore potentially the Rosetta Stone for three of the four types of GRBs:ℓ, i, and s GRBs [60, 61],9 with both polar ejecta and common envelope, red supergiant common envelope and no polar ejecta, and neither polar ejecta nor common envelope, respectively [62].In addition to axially driven pulsations, the SLIP model makes the very remarkable prediction that the component of pulsar intensity which obeys (1) diminishes only as distance-1 (see appendix), and verified experimentally [63, 64],10 and has been dramatically confirmed [23], and noted by others [65], for pulsars in the Parkes Multibeam Survey (e.g., [66]) with single narrow pulses (see Figure 10 and Section 6.1).11 There is also evidence that GRBs and their afterglows share this characteristic [67, 68], which supports the SLIP prediction of axially driven pulsations when plasma is available at many RLC. The SLIP prediction also explains how GRBs and their afterglows can be visible across the Universe. As a consequence of this prediction, we initiated a campaign of high speed monitoring of GRB afterglows in 2008 and 2009 at the Lick Observatory Crossley 36 inch telescope (without success—“live” bright afterglows occur about one night in 60) and will reinitiate it as soon as the opportunity presents itself.Figure 10
Left, lower horizontal axis: the population of 497 pulsars from the Parkes Multibeam Survey which fall into binned distances, with centers between ~2.5 and ~10.75 kpc, plotted against the log of the product of their 1400 MHz fluxes and their NE2001 distances from [69, 70]. Right, upper horizontal axis: the same for a synthetic distribution of pulsars which obey the inverse square law. The two families of curves are both in order of increasing distance from left to right at a population fraction of 0.2.If, as for SN 1987A, the vast majority of SNe are DD initiated, then, by measuring the pulse period,P, of the optical/near infrared pulsations from an afterglow and assuming the pulsars resulting from DD are all produced at a standard spin period, P0, first measured from SN 1987A near 2.14 ms, but corrected to near 2.00 ms because of material ejected, the redshift is given by
(10)z=PP0-1,
and even a moderately precise P (by standards) may yield a very precise redshift.SLIP predicts that the peak of the emission for slowest pulsars occurs in the gamma-ray band [71–73], and this is supported by recent gamma-ray detections of slow (~1 Hz) pulsars in supernova remnants by FERMI (e.g., [74]). Without this feature, one would naively question whether SLIP could produce pulsed GRB afterglows when the predicted post-core-collapse strength of the magnetic field at 100 s of RLC, whether from a several teragauss 80 Hz pulsar or a few gigagauss 500 Hz pulsar, would be well below the few megagauss necessary to drive cyclotron radiation in the optical and near-infrared bands. SLIP is more complicated; the centripetal acceleration of the polarization currents leads to contributions for a wide range of high frequencies. The essential necessary ingredient is plasma (see Section 6.2), and in this situation, there’s plenty.There is no requirement in the SLIP model on the rotator being a neutron star—a white dwarf will do as long as it has a magnetic field and there is plasma outside of its light cylinder, whether this comes from pulsar-generated plasma sheets or gravitationally attracted ISM or SNR plasma. If this is the case, strongly magnetized pulsars may not make GRBs, and it might even be possible for a precore collapse, ~1.4M⊙ white dwarf, spinning at its minimum period of 1.98 s, to emit the prompt part of a GRB, and, as with the afterglow, the distance-1 law would likewise ameliorate the energy requirement, even with the large expected spinup. This also raises the intriguing possibility that a GRB could be produced without core collapse, and a large spin down may be present.We tested for spinup/down in the GRB with the highest fluence in the BATSE catalog, 960216 [75], by Fourier, transforming the first 40 s of events and contouring power on the frequency-(∂f/∂t) plane. Power appears in Figure 11, though not significant without further confirmation, at a mean frequency of 0.50 Hz and derivative of +0.08 Hz s-1 and also for spinup/down about an order of magnitude smaller in the 0.35 to 0.42 Hz region (the results for higher frequencies, assuming 0f˙, are also negative). Bursts with even better statistics (perhaps from FERMI) may be necessary to further test this hypothesis.Figure 11
Low frequency Fourier power from GRB 960216 (with ~18,000 events in 40 s) is contoured on the frequency-frequency derivative plane.It is difficult for a GRB produced by pulsations during spinup to produce an inverted distance law because of the changingv. Alternately, GRBs may be produced when gamma-ray photons from the initial collimated SLIP photon flux scatters off of circumstellar material such as polar ejecta [76]. For material such as polar ejecta, in a plane perpendicular to a line of sight from the SN proper, the pattern of illuminated, scattering, concentric rings expands supraluminally, and thus, this emission also exhibits a distance-1 law for certain directions. However, the initial gamma rays from the compact remnant actually penetrate the polar ejecta considerably, and thus, the scattering produces a volume source. What will be observed as a GRB across the Universe will be whatever produces a supraluminal source with an inverted distance law.The geometric model with small-angle scattering of gamma rays in distant polar ejecta can explain other details ofℓGRBs such as their ~100 s T90’s,12 the negligible spectral lag for late (~10–100 s) emission from “spikelike” bursts [77], and why “precursor” and “delayed” contributions have similar temporal structure [62, 78].Moving a1040 erg s-1 source from 25 ℓt-d to 8 billion light-years (z~1), assuming a distance-1 law, would only reduce the apparent magnitude to −15. Optical flashes of visual magnitude 2, which reddened as they faded, were observed on two occasions by Howard Bond (private communication, 2008). No known triggers occurred at the noted times.X-ray afterglows of GRBs are characterized by a power law index,α, for the decline of intensity with time and another, β, to characterize the power law decline of the X-ray spectrum. The temporal index is discontinuous at sudden changes in slope called “jet breaks”. The two indices can be related through the “closure relations” for various circumstances affecting the jet, though with limited success for Swift GRBs [79]. In the SLIP model, breaks in the temporal slope of the optical afterglows, if they existed, would be caused by sudden changes in plasma density outside of the neutron star through (1). Because the steep decline of the X-ray flux (α~3) matches that of the GRB, which is unlikely to be pulsed, we do not expect the X-ray afterglow to be pulsed either, and their jet breaks may be caused by changes in the scattering of high-energy photons due to structure in the polar ejecta [76]. However, in order to be observable at all, the X-ray afterglows must have an inverted distance law similar to GRBs resulting from a supraluminal process of one sort or another. Whether or not these are pulsed at all remains to be determined.SLIP has little difficulty explaining the unusually long duration of GRB 101225A (T90>2000 s) through a coalescence between a neutron star and another star [80, 81], that is, a “borrowed SN”. Initially, the outer layers of the star will be ejected by SLIP, and this activity will become progressively more violent with the inspiral of the neutron star as plasma becomes available at increasing RLC, though the tilt of the rotation axis relative to the plane of the inspiral will matter. It is this progression that is unusual for the GRB and is responsible for the longevity through gamma rays scattering in previously ejected material. A magnetar or, again, the formation of a black hole is unnecessary to make the jets (and highly unlikely unless the star is extremely massive). This is yet another case where high time resolution observations are sorely needed.


## 5. Double Degenerate in Type Ia/c SNe

Since 2007, Feb., it appeared unavoidable that Type Ia SNe were also DD generated, one of the causes being the long list of reasons why Ia’s cannot be due to thermonuclear disruption [62, 82–85]. Now, with two out of two SNe Ia (SNR 0509-675 and SN 2011fe), leaving no symbiotic companion [86, 87], it is not clear if this ever happens in any progenitor, and empty SN remnants almost always contain a neutron star which is not visible, just as the one in Cas A is barely visible [88]. Further, this means that Ia’s and Ic’s (these latter have been regarded by many as DD-initiated neutron star producing since the invention of the classification) are both due to the DD process. Thus, these must form a continuous class: Ia’s when viewed from the merger equator (with lines of Fe); and Ic’s when viewed from the merger poles, because this view reveals lines of the r-process elements characteristic of Ic’s,13 part of the reason for the differing spectroscopic classification and the high approaching velocities (e.g., “hypernovae”)14 due to the view looking down the the axis of the approaching bipolarity.In the application of Type Ia SN luminosities for cosmological purposes, the increase in blue magnitude from the light curve maximum,ΔMB (essentially an inverse measure of the width of the light curve in time), measured in the first few weeks of SN Ia proper time, is used to correct the Ia luminosity for the variable amount of 56Ni produced [89]. However, the direct relation, between the ΔMB of the width-luminosity relation and the fractional SiII polarization in Ia’s, pointed out by [90], is more meaningfully interpreted as an inverse relation between the SiII polarization and luminosity (unlike the Fe lines, SiII lines must also exist in the axial features because they are also observed in Ic’s, and their polarization in Ia’s is a result of the more rapid axial extension when viewed close to the merger equator).This inverse relation would be expected in Ia’s if the luminosity of the (very extended and productive of polarization) axial features were fixed, while the luminosity of the (less extended and less productive of polarization) toroidal component is driven by the amount ofencapsulated56Ni positron annihilation gamma rays, which can be very high. As with 1987A-like events, it would again beg the question of “What else they could possibly be?” and “delayed detonation” [91] or “gravitationally confined detonation” [92] and may not produce polarization which would be inversely proportional to luminosity. And unless the view is very near polar, this geometry can produce split emission line(s) on rare occasions, as was seen in SN 2003jd [93], and thus again, there is no need to invoke exotica or an entire population (III) to account for GRBs [94, 95].Because there is a spectroscopic difference between Ia’s and Ic’s, the SLIP-driven polar jets are either deficient in56Ni or are too diffuse to encapsulate their gamma rays, or both. No observation of any recent SN other than SN 1986J, 2006gy, and 2007bi, and including all ever made of Type Ia SNe, is inconsistent with the bipolar geometry of 1987A.All this raises serious concerns about the use of SNe Ia in cosmology, because many Ia/c’s in actively star-forming galaxies belong to the continuous class, and some of these and most Ia’s in ellipticals, may not encapsulate a sufficient fraction of their gamma rays to be bolometric, especially given the toroidal geometry, lying as much as two whole magnitudes (or more for nearly naked core collapse) below the width-luminosity relation (the faint SNe Ia of [96]). Thus the log of the systematics (2+ magnitudes) can be an order of a magnitude bigger than the log of 1 plus the small effect (0.25 magnitude) from which dark energy was inferred in the same sense, an effect which could easily swamp Malmquist bias, the largest systematic working in the opposite sense.In the SLIP model, the pulsar eviscerates its stellar remnant as long as there is remnant remaining; the SN cannot “close in” to a spherical configuration until much later when it will essentially become a shell source. This enforces a toroidal geometry of ejecta near its rotation equator, which may not conform to the width-luminosity relation because of unencapsulated positron annihilation gamma rays from the toroid, an assertion supported by the early detection of hard X-rays and gamma rays [97–100]. However, the local sample was selected on the basis of conforming to the width-luminosity (W-L) relation, which is by definition [101] the high end of the luminosity function. Thus, the unavoidable inclusion of faint Ia’s in the distant sample leads to a bias which makes it appear to be anomalously dim, assuming a distance-2 law, which seems appropriate for these objects. Supernovae which do not conform to the W-L relation have also been noted in 2005, by [102], for high redshift ESSENCE SNe.


## 6. Sco X-1, LMXBs, SS 433, and Other Details

### 6.1. DD and SN Luminosities

The double-degenerate mechanism ensures that many SNe are born from the core collapse of a postmerger white dwarf with a rotation period near 2 s. In this circumstance, the amount of56Ni produced depends on how much and what type of material is left in the common envelope in excess of the ~1.4 M⊙ lost to the neutron star (and emitted neutrinos), which can exceed this. The paltry amounts of 56Ni associated with Ib’s and at least 90% of IIs are likely the result of dilution of their thermonuclear fuel with He and/or H due to the DD merger process.15 Thus, SNe 2006gy and 2007bi [103, 104] do not have to be pair-instability SNe [105–108] or the former of a collision of two massive stars [109]; only massive FeSNe of up to 75 M⊙, which may actually have produced 3 and 6 M⊙ of 56Ni, respectively, and a strongly magnetized neutron star remnant, a prediction which, in the case of SN 2006gy, can be tested soon.16 Alternately, if the progenitor of SN 2007bi was stripped of its H and He by some mechanism, it could have been a DD (Type Ia/c) SN with a high luminosity due to a high mass (C and O) in its common envelope.


### 6.2. SLIP, Plasma, and Intermittent Pulsations

The presence of plasma makes a huge difference to rapidly rotating, weakly magnetized neutron stars. Strong transient pulsations have occurred during observations of SN remnants or X-ray binaries which have never been subsequently confirmed, and yet have no explanation other than as a real astrophysical signal (e.g., the Cygnus Loop, see [110]). Judging from the high fraction of empty SN remnants, the population of “quiet” neutron stars must exceed all other “loud” populations combined [111]. All Galactic pulsars have the interstellar medium from which to draw plasma with their intense gravitational field, but frequently this is not enough; then only when such a neutron star encounters a cloud of matter will it become sufficiently luminous to be detected. It is for this reason that observations of SN 1987A should continue, as has already been suggested in Section 3, in spite of conclusions drawn from recent “snapshot” null results [34, 112].SLIP also makes no assumptions about the carrier wave—a physical process such as cyclotron radiation/strong plasma turbulence is necessary for the pulsar to radiate at shorter/longer wavelengths, but centripetal acceleration of the emitting region further modifies this spectrum by adding emission to shorter wavelengths. Thus, whether or not emission is observed in a band where SLIP predicts it should exist, as, for example, the few GeV cutoff of the Fermi pulsars [113], if real, would indicate something about the physical conditions of, and/or near, the pulsar.In the context of the SLIP model, emission from rotation powered pulsars is not haphazard—radiation from the known pulsars may very well be detected from Earth because we are “in the cusp,” that is, we are in the part of the pulsar’s beam that decays inversely only as the first power of distance (1), which may be one of the reasons why repeated attempts to detect pulsations from extragalactic SNe have failed (e.g., [114]; another reason might be that all except SN 1987A were too distant).


### 6.3. Low-Mass X-Ray Binary (and Other) Rotation Rates

Although SLIP makes the detection of pulsations from the luminous LMXBs unlikely (see Section1), there may still be a few ways to tell fast that their neutron star components are spinning. Because neutron stars are the accreting compact members of most, if not all LMXBs [115], thermonuclear (Type I) X-ray bursts are common, as are the oscillations which occur during them [116, 117]. Some of the oscillation frequencies are quite high, with 1122 Hz for XTE J1739-285 topping the list [118]. Many of these frequencies are thought to reveal the actual rotation period of the neutron star. Many, including the first observed burst oscillations in the optical pulsation in 4U1254-69 [119], show oscillations with only modest frequencies (in this case, 36.4 Hz),17 which also might be the neutron star rotation rates. These modest spin rates are consistent with the LMXB rotation rates settling to a rate where spindown from SLIP, which may increase more than linearly with mass transfer rate, can exceed by several orders of magnitude any spinup due to accretion, which is subject to the Eddington limit. The association with rotation periods might be made when these are observed to remain the same (or very close) in repeated bursts. Pulsations from LMXB rotation frequencies may be observed in those for which the restrictive beaming (θV≪1) occasionally relaxes, that is, for which plasma is restricted to fewer RLC (θV≅1, see Section 6.10).There is also a small group of about a dozen transient accreting millisecond X-ray pulsars, most of which also only show oscillations during Type I bursts (e.g., [120]). Many of these have accretion rates that are not persistently high and also have very high spin rates such as 400 Hz for SAX J1808.4-3658. In addition, of the three fastest pulsars, two, J1748-2446ad and J1959+2048, are currently evaporating their extremely low mass companions and one, B1937+21, already has. All this is consistent with an inverse relation, at some point between the rates of mass transfer and net rates of spinning up.


### 6.4. Sco X-1

The dual radio lobes of Sco X-1 [121], which expand at ~0.3–0.57 c, and to which energy must be transported at speeds of 0.95 c or greater, are a nearly exact match to the derived kinetics of the Mystery Spot of SN 1987A and might have actually been observed and detected from 1987A in the radio band, given a sufficiently large and sensitive radio array in the Southern Hemisphere, which did not exist at the time. Wright et al. [122] have noted that the <19-hour orbital period constrains the companion to a very faint M dwarf or a white dwarf stellar core. This would imply that the accretia would be rich in metals as is the case with SN 1987A, though the 0.95c transport of energy in its jets also argues for some hydrogen, or at least spall protons (see Section 6.7), which are then accelerated by the usual SN “boost” mechanism of heavier elements hitting lighter ones. If so, then considering that the elements of the accretia may not be stratified, as they may have been at least partially so within the newly born remnant of SN 1987A, it is amazing that this mechanism works at all, and this, plus the relative dearth of H, may explain the relative weakness of Sco X-1’s very fast jet component.


### 6.5. Historic Remnants and Pulse Profiles

If we are not “in the cusp,” for any annulus of plasma beyond the pulsar light cylinder, whose induced radiation is free to propagate to infinity, spinning neutron stars may only appear as thermal sources such as the one in Cas A [88]. A century older, as is the case with Tycho 1572, not even the thermal sources were detectable. However, the extinction of AV=3.47,+0.13,-0.29 mag. to the Kepler 1604 remnant [123], though a revision up from 2.2 [124], is still much less than the 6.2±0.6 mag. to Cas A [125], with the distances nearly equal at 3.2 and 3.4 kpc. Thus, assuming that extinction traces H column and all SNe produce compact remnants, the pulsar in this remnant should be visible as a thermal source, so perhaps the neutron star in Cas A is visible because of SLIP beaming. Evidence does linger, however, even in the outwardly very spherical remnant of SN 1006 as bipolar high-energy emission in XMM and VLA images [126], with the high-velocity chimneys seen in Cas A [127] being long gone. For many pulsars, such as the Crab, which were discovered because of an SN remnant association, we may not be in the “in the cusp,” and thus, the isotropic optical luminosity of the pulsar may currently still be ~3 L⊙. However, for those pulsars that are in the cusp, the SLIP model predicts that the pulse profile will consist of two very close peaks,18 which would seem to exclude the Crab (e.g., [128, 129]) and ascribed the interpulse to some other mechanism [130] (see the appendix), but the solitary pulse of the 16.1 ms pulsar, J0537-6910, will split, if allowed by the fitting process (see immediately below).


### 6.6. The Pulsar, J0537-6910, and the SLIP Model

SLIP predicts that pulsed emission arises outside of the light cylinder, either from current sheets originating close to the pulsar or from ISM plasma which has been concentrated by gravity from the neutron star, or both. In either case, the plasma outside of the light cylinder is most densejust outside of the light cylinder. In the case of the 62 Hz X-ray pulsar in the Large Magellanic Cloud, J0537-6910, SLIP explains why it is not a strong optical pulsar [131]. Although J0537 only has an effective dipole field of ≤1 TG, since it is an oblique rotator [30], its actual surface field could be as strong as that of the Crab, B0540-693, 3–5 TG, or even stronger. In addition, because of its rapid 62-Hz spin, the magnetic field just outside of its light cylinder, which is less than half as distant as that of the Crab pulsar, is an order of magnitude larger still. This means that the cyclotron frequencies just outside of the light cylinder of J0537 are an order of magnitude (or more) higher than those which contribute to the optical pulsations of the Crab, and thus are shifted out of the optical regime upward toward the X-ray regime. Since cyclotron frequencies do not have subharmonics, and the centripetal acceleration at the light cylinder, ωc, is also higher than those of the Crab or B0540, J0537 cannot and does not produce strong optical pulsations However, assuming that the frequency 2nd derivative persists at -0.95×10-21 Hz s-2, J0537 will spin at 31 Hz in ~3,800 years and may be a strong optical pulsar by that time.As mentioned above, the single narrow peak of the pulse profile of J0537 is likely an indication that we observe its X-ray pulsations at least partially (the pulse width is ~10% of the period) as a result of thedistance-1 law, and its 2–10 keV pulsed X-ray luminosity could be lower than 2×1035 erg s-1 as estimated by [132].


### 6.7. The Positron Excess, WMAP “Haze”, and Fermi “Bubbles”

A beam of protons, with kinetic energies of up to 2.2 GeV or greater, will eventually produce electrons with similar energies. Electrons/positrons with even higher energies may result from photon scattering because the cross section varies inversely as the square of the particle mass and/or the leptons may, in turn, be further accelerated by magnetic reconnection, in woundup magnetic fields near the Galactic center, or other mechanisms [133], possibly to TeV energies, to produce the WMAP “Haze”/FERMI “Bubbles” observed in that direction [134, 135]. In addition, the SNR loss/relativistic injection of 56Ni positrons into the pulsar jet, which occurs because of the bipolarity of SNe and which also makes them unfit for easy cosmological interpretation, may show up as an excess in cosmic ray data [136–138]. This may offer a satisfying resolution for the apparent anomalous dimming of distant SNe explained in terms of local cosmic-ray abundances, without invoking the creation of electron-positron pairs near pulsars and their acceleration along “open” field lines which do not exist if one believes in the validity of the Sommerfeld equations [17, 18]. TeV fermions generated by SNe and/or pulsars would alleviate the short lifetime problem (~106 yr) associated with the Galactic center as a potential direct source. SLIP does not require pulsars to generate positrons in order for them to emit radiation, so the 10–100 GeV positron flux may not be dominated by contributions from local pulsars but may be provided instead by the supernovae that gave birth to them recently. The main difficulties lie in accounting for how and why the excess rises at energies above 10 GeV and below 100 GeV.Protons at multiple GeV energies will destroy the (relatively stationary) heavy nuclei they collide with, resulting in the release of free neutrons which can drive ther-process in supernovae. A density of 1024cm-3 in free neutrons has been invoked to drive this process, but SLIP can provide this near the center of the newly formed remnant. However, SLIP also clearly drives the r-process, whose element lines are visible in early Ic spectra, at the poles of SNe Ia/c, as described in Sections 1 and 5, where the influence of annuli well outside of the stellar core bypasses that same core to produce focused beams at the two poles, where C and O are both available. Detailed calculations are deferred for future efforts (see, e.g., [139]).


### 6.8. The SS 433 Jets

The extreme collimation of the initial beam and jet in SN 1987A and even the strong Hα seen in its spectrum near day 19.6 are suggestive of a similar situation in SS 433 (e.g., [140]), and a rapidly spinning pulsar has been proposed for the underlying central engine (e.g., [141]), although mass estimates for the compact object vary from 0.8 to 16 M⊙ [142–145]. The big problem with SS 433 is accounting for the mechanical power necessary to produce 1034 erg s-1 of Hα from recombination in two jets with velocities of 0.26c, which could amount to 1042 erg s-1 if each atom has only one recombination. Because of the few minute variability of the Hα [146, 147] with no variability of its velocity >1%, the standard method of its solution is to invoke a clumpiness of 105 in the jets titled “bullets” (e.g., [148]), so that each atom recombines many times (~102.5).Although [149] constrained the parameter space for the bullets, assuming the Hα production mechanism was an interaction of the jets with a B-star wind, the possibility of many excitations per atom, due to beamed radiation, was an admitted exception to the requirement for bullets. Of course this is exactly what SLIP does in the process, easily producing the kinematic and collimation properties of the SS 433 jets from an ms pulsar buried in hydrogen-dominated accretia, where L∞ at the source is redshifted to Lα in the mature jets (this is exact for β=0.28, but the actual β is lower [0.26], consistent with the finite bandwidth necessary for the jet acceleration mechanism to work), the usual SN boost mechanism being unavailable because of the lack of high Z accretia.If SLIP turns out to be a necessary mechanism to produce the jets and their Hα flux, then the rarity of SS 433 may be less, due to the wind from a Population I B star, than its association with a weakly magnetized ms pulsar, which clearly did not originate from a massive solitary star similar to what we think describes the primary. The best chance to detect a pulsar in SS 433 may be during a low state, should that ever happen, there having been no sign of any pulsar (e.g., [150]) in the high state it has occupied since the discovery of its bizarre behavior in 1978. A 2 ms pulsar could power the jets for 104 years if each atom produces ~20 Hα photons, not even accounting for any spinup due to accretion. It is more likely, however, that the spin period of SS 433 is larger because a 2 ms period is associated with the evisceration of SN progenitors by SLIP, and, in the presence of plasma at many RLC as happens in both SS 433 and SNe, will have a very large spindown, whereas the actual spin of SS 433 will settle to a rate where spinup from accretion is balanced by spindown due to SLIP. This rate will likely be a bit higher than what is typical for the luminous LMXBs, perhaps closer to a period of 5 ms, because of the lack of heavy elements loading SLIP (see Section 6.10).


### 6.9. Star Formation Avalanche in the Early Universe

Computer simulations of clustering in the Early Universe fail without the addition of some extra agent to increase the rate at which clusters form (see, e.g., [151]). The problem is that the agents which can be easily inserted into the codes, such as dark matter or dark energy, almost always involve controversial physics which may not be valid. Aside from such agents, the only known mechanism which is frequent and violent enough to possibly play the same role are the pulsar-driven jets resulting from the supernovae of the first stars.Although high velocity material will suppress star formation locally (M.-M. Mac Low, 2011, private communication), even the early Universe (z~7) is vast, and this same material will initiate star formation [152–155] at some distance from the pulsar in the two initially polar jets. Without spreading, the Mystery Spot column, σMS, of 0.5 gm cm-2 will penetrate even the early Universe at z=7, with 4% of the present day critical density in baryonic mass. Assuming, for the sake of simplicity, a linear (conical) spreading scale of ℓ0=3×1016 cm in an interstellar medium of density of ρB7=1.9×10-28 g cm-3 (4% of critical density at z~5001/3—1~7), and solving for the pathlength, ℓ, whereby a column of mass equal to the spread-diluted Mystery Spot column has been swept up in its last 10%, we get
(11)ℓ~200pc(ℓ03×1016)2/3(σMS0.5)1/3(ρB71.9×10-28)-1/3.The collimation of the Mystery Spot is not exactly known, but it cannot be as extreme as the104→5 of the initial beam/jet. However, it could easily amount to a few square light-days at a distance of 10 light-days. In that case, the plume would be about a few light years across at 100 pc. Along the way, shearing vortices may initiate star formation, with higher velocities at the larger distances from the endpoint.The actual situation may be much more complicated, as the decline of the jet collimation with time will impact the previously formed vortices. The stars formed by this process may also initiate another round of star formation as they move through the primordial ISM and so on, with each cluster retaining a tiny, though important, fraction of the initial jet velocity. Infant clusters in close proximity with nearly matched velocities may merge due to their sustained mutual gravitational attraction. In this way, the SLIP jets may initiate a star formation avalanche, possibly leading to minicluster and/or stream formation in a few million years, with no requirement for dark matter. The recent discovery by GALEX [156, 157] of velocities between close pairs of distant galaxies, which do not reflect their mutual gravitational attraction, may be the result of the separation velocities of pulsar-driven jets in their formation of star clusters. Again, detailed calculations are deferred for future efforts.


### 6.10. Pulsar “Recycling”

Pulsars with rapid spins and weak magnetic fields are commonly referred to as having been “recycled,” wherein these attributes are a result of a (usually) long dead pulsar undergoing an extensive interval of accretion from a binary companion which it acquired or already had, that as a result has increased its spin rate from the few-second period typical of a very old strongly magnetized pulsar to the ms period range, and as a side effect, either of the accretion or slow decay of the effective magnetic dipole by some other mechanism because of advanced age, or both, reduced its original several teragauss magnetic field by 2 to 4 orders of magnitude.Here, however, we have seen evidence that the spindown due to SLIP can greatly exceed any spinup due to accretion. Thus, the only way to tell if a pulsar has been recycled is by a mass substantially in excess of 1.3M⊙ (as is the case for J1903+0327),19 but even then, there’s no guarantee that the pulsar has suffered any net spinup, the result depending on accretion rate and history, spin rate, and magnetic field strength and configuration.To gain further understanding of this process, 1723 pulsars are located on the log period-period derivative plane in Figure12. On this plot, the connection between the “ordinary” pulsars in the upper right to the “recycled” pulsars in the lower left is a two-lane one-way highway. The top lane (higher-period derivative) contains all six of the globular cluster pulsars and nine Population I pulsars for the period range from 10 to 100 ms, while the bottom lane contains just Population I pulsars for that range. Metalicity and gravitational contamination are unlikely contributors to this pattern. The lanes have numerical slopes of about 1.5, meaning that if pulsars migrate to the right and slightly up in the lanes, the period derivatives gain 3 parts for every 2-parts-gain in period. By contrast, the same ratio is 3 to 1 for the young (4,000-year old) 16.1 ms PSR J0537-6910 (see Section 6.6), twice the slope of the two lanes (its effective magnetic dipole increases by 0.02% per year), so perhaps the pulsars in these lanes actually do migrate right and up along their respective sloped paths.Figure 12
A plot of 1723 pulsars from the ATNF pulsar database in the log period-period derivative plane. Nonbinary, nonglobular cluster pulsars are marked by “+” signs, nonglobular binary pulsars by×’s, nonbinary globular cluster pulsars by circles, globular binary pulsars by squares, four strongly magnetized young pulsars by pentagons, and the 2.14 ms signal from SN 1987A by an hourglass.Unfortunately, none of the six globular cluster pulsars in the upper lane within that period range have measured second frequency derivatives (which should be negative for this migration but which will also suffer extremely from gravitational contamination), so we cannot test the hypothesis that these pulsars are migrating on the slightly upward path. Of the 32 nonglobular pulsars in the lanes within this period range, 2 have negative, and 2 have positive, frequency second derivatives, so half of these four pulsars are not migrating within the lanes. With a period derivative of 1.88e-20, J1903+0327 lies on the low boundary of the short-period end of the upper lane. The offset between the two lanes corresponds to nearly two orders of magnitude in period derivative, but only one order of magnitude in field strength.Still, this offset between the two lanes is likely to be due to different accretion histories, provided, accretion does in fact reduce pulsar effective dipoles as postulated by [158, 159]. The simplest interpretation is that pulsars in the upper lane, containing about ten of eleven globular cluster pulsars with periods >8 ms, have never suffered accretion and were born fast and weakly magnetized.It is even difficult to argue in favor of a strongly magnetized origin for those pulsars in the lower lane, as it would seem strange that this population starts only from those “ordinary” pulsars with the smallest period derivatives, and neither from the much larger population of “dead” pulsars with even lower period derivatives.20 It may be more likely that this (lower) lane is from faster pulsars which accreted from binary companions to become LMXBs that have ceased to accrete, and are left there. Similarly, the upper lane may populate the main group just above its lowest point.So on average these pulsars slowed during their phase of high accretion, which is in line with the modest QPO frequencies seen in many LMXBs,21 and the high frequencies seen from most of the accreting millisecond X-ray pulsars, which have very low accretion rates.As the accretion rate diminishes when the binary companion begins to withdraw from its Roche limit, for whatever reason as long as this is a gradual process, the pulsar will have an era of spinup, possibly resulting in the pileup at 3–5 ms periods. Here, however, pulsars are found with period derivatives still lower than those of the lower path, thus requiring a population of neutron stars which were born only weakly magnetized and likely spinning in the millisecond range.Thus, these two discrete lanes connecting the “normal” pulsar group in the upper right to the ms pulsars in the lower left require a source of pulsars whose spin rates are faster than 200 Hz. Again, the most likely source to populate these paths is the source of fast-born 2 ms pulsars from the DD process. Since there are orders of magnitude more neutron stars generated by the DD mechanism than by Fe catastrophe, there should be a much larger reservoir of “dead” weakly magnetized pulsars than their “dead” strongly magnetized cousins. A study of the high-space velocities of solitary neutron stars as compared to the masses and low eccentricities of double neutron star binaries has also reached the conclusion of the necessity of two mechanisms to produce neutron stars [160], the DD process being the second (though overwhelmingly predominant) mechanism.


## 6.1. DD and SN Luminosities

The double-degenerate mechanism ensures that many SNe are born from the core collapse of a postmerger white dwarf with a rotation period near 2 s. In this circumstance, the amount of56Ni produced depends on how much and what type of material is left in the common envelope in excess of the ~1.4 M⊙ lost to the neutron star (and emitted neutrinos), which can exceed this. The paltry amounts of 56Ni associated with Ib’s and at least 90% of IIs are likely the result of dilution of their thermonuclear fuel with He and/or H due to the DD merger process.15 Thus, SNe 2006gy and 2007bi [103, 104] do not have to be pair-instability SNe [105–108] or the former of a collision of two massive stars [109]; only massive FeSNe of up to 75 M⊙, which may actually have produced 3 and 6 M⊙ of 56Ni, respectively, and a strongly magnetized neutron star remnant, a prediction which, in the case of SN 2006gy, can be tested soon.16 Alternately, if the progenitor of SN 2007bi was stripped of its H and He by some mechanism, it could have been a DD (Type Ia/c) SN with a high luminosity due to a high mass (C and O) in its common envelope.


## 6.2. SLIP, Plasma, and Intermittent Pulsations

The presence of plasma makes a huge difference to rapidly rotating, weakly magnetized neutron stars. Strong transient pulsations have occurred during observations of SN remnants or X-ray binaries which have never been subsequently confirmed, and yet have no explanation other than as a real astrophysical signal (e.g., the Cygnus Loop, see [110]). Judging from the high fraction of empty SN remnants, the population of “quiet” neutron stars must exceed all other “loud” populations combined [111]. All Galactic pulsars have the interstellar medium from which to draw plasma with their intense gravitational field, but frequently this is not enough; then only when such a neutron star encounters a cloud of matter will it become sufficiently luminous to be detected. It is for this reason that observations of SN 1987A should continue, as has already been suggested in Section 3, in spite of conclusions drawn from recent “snapshot” null results [34, 112].SLIP also makes no assumptions about the carrier wave—a physical process such as cyclotron radiation/strong plasma turbulence is necessary for the pulsar to radiate at shorter/longer wavelengths, but centripetal acceleration of the emitting region further modifies this spectrum by adding emission to shorter wavelengths. Thus, whether or not emission is observed in a band where SLIP predicts it should exist, as, for example, the few GeV cutoff of the Fermi pulsars [113], if real, would indicate something about the physical conditions of, and/or near, the pulsar.In the context of the SLIP model, emission from rotation powered pulsars is not haphazard—radiation from the known pulsars may very well be detected from Earth because we are “in the cusp,” that is, we are in the part of the pulsar’s beam that decays inversely only as the first power of distance (1), which may be one of the reasons why repeated attempts to detect pulsations from extragalactic SNe have failed (e.g., [114]; another reason might be that all except SN 1987A were too distant).


## 6.3. Low-Mass X-Ray Binary (and Other) Rotation Rates

Although SLIP makes the detection of pulsations from the luminous LMXBs unlikely (see Section1), there may still be a few ways to tell fast that their neutron star components are spinning. Because neutron stars are the accreting compact members of most, if not all LMXBs [115], thermonuclear (Type I) X-ray bursts are common, as are the oscillations which occur during them [116, 117]. Some of the oscillation frequencies are quite high, with 1122 Hz for XTE J1739-285 topping the list [118]. Many of these frequencies are thought to reveal the actual rotation period of the neutron star. Many, including the first observed burst oscillations in the optical pulsation in 4U1254-69 [119], show oscillations with only modest frequencies (in this case, 36.4 Hz),17 which also might be the neutron star rotation rates. These modest spin rates are consistent with the LMXB rotation rates settling to a rate where spindown from SLIP, which may increase more than linearly with mass transfer rate, can exceed by several orders of magnitude any spinup due to accretion, which is subject to the Eddington limit. The association with rotation periods might be made when these are observed to remain the same (or very close) in repeated bursts. Pulsations from LMXB rotation frequencies may be observed in those for which the restrictive beaming (θV≪1) occasionally relaxes, that is, for which plasma is restricted to fewer RLC (θV≅1, see Section 6.10).There is also a small group of about a dozen transient accreting millisecond X-ray pulsars, most of which also only show oscillations during Type I bursts (e.g., [120]). Many of these have accretion rates that are not persistently high and also have very high spin rates such as 400 Hz for SAX J1808.4-3658. In addition, of the three fastest pulsars, two, J1748-2446ad and J1959+2048, are currently evaporating their extremely low mass companions and one, B1937+21, already has. All this is consistent with an inverse relation, at some point between the rates of mass transfer and net rates of spinning up.


## 6.4. Sco X-1

The dual radio lobes of Sco X-1 [121], which expand at ~0.3–0.57 c, and to which energy must be transported at speeds of 0.95 c or greater, are a nearly exact match to the derived kinetics of the Mystery Spot of SN 1987A and might have actually been observed and detected from 1987A in the radio band, given a sufficiently large and sensitive radio array in the Southern Hemisphere, which did not exist at the time. Wright et al. [122] have noted that the <19-hour orbital period constrains the companion to a very faint M dwarf or a white dwarf stellar core. This would imply that the accretia would be rich in metals as is the case with SN 1987A, though the 0.95c transport of energy in its jets also argues for some hydrogen, or at least spall protons (see Section 6.7), which are then accelerated by the usual SN “boost” mechanism of heavier elements hitting lighter ones. If so, then considering that the elements of the accretia may not be stratified, as they may have been at least partially so within the newly born remnant of SN 1987A, it is amazing that this mechanism works at all, and this, plus the relative dearth of H, may explain the relative weakness of Sco X-1’s very fast jet component.


## 6.5. Historic Remnants and Pulse Profiles

If we are not “in the cusp,” for any annulus of plasma beyond the pulsar light cylinder, whose induced radiation is free to propagate to infinity, spinning neutron stars may only appear as thermal sources such as the one in Cas A [88]. A century older, as is the case with Tycho 1572, not even the thermal sources were detectable. However, the extinction of AV=3.47,+0.13,-0.29 mag. to the Kepler 1604 remnant [123], though a revision up from 2.2 [124], is still much less than the 6.2±0.6 mag. to Cas A [125], with the distances nearly equal at 3.2 and 3.4 kpc. Thus, assuming that extinction traces H column and all SNe produce compact remnants, the pulsar in this remnant should be visible as a thermal source, so perhaps the neutron star in Cas A is visible because of SLIP beaming. Evidence does linger, however, even in the outwardly very spherical remnant of SN 1006 as bipolar high-energy emission in XMM and VLA images [126], with the high-velocity chimneys seen in Cas A [127] being long gone. For many pulsars, such as the Crab, which were discovered because of an SN remnant association, we may not be in the “in the cusp,” and thus, the isotropic optical luminosity of the pulsar may currently still be ~3 L⊙. However, for those pulsars that are in the cusp, the SLIP model predicts that the pulse profile will consist of two very close peaks,18 which would seem to exclude the Crab (e.g., [128, 129]) and ascribed the interpulse to some other mechanism [130] (see the appendix), but the solitary pulse of the 16.1 ms pulsar, J0537-6910, will split, if allowed by the fitting process (see immediately below).


## 6.6. The Pulsar, J0537-6910, and the SLIP Model

SLIP predicts that pulsed emission arises outside of the light cylinder, either from current sheets originating close to the pulsar or from ISM plasma which has been concentrated by gravity from the neutron star, or both. In either case, the plasma outside of the light cylinder is most densejust outside of the light cylinder. In the case of the 62 Hz X-ray pulsar in the Large Magellanic Cloud, J0537-6910, SLIP explains why it is not a strong optical pulsar [131]. Although J0537 only has an effective dipole field of ≤1 TG, since it is an oblique rotator [30], its actual surface field could be as strong as that of the Crab, B0540-693, 3–5 TG, or even stronger. In addition, because of its rapid 62-Hz spin, the magnetic field just outside of its light cylinder, which is less than half as distant as that of the Crab pulsar, is an order of magnitude larger still. This means that the cyclotron frequencies just outside of the light cylinder of J0537 are an order of magnitude (or more) higher than those which contribute to the optical pulsations of the Crab, and thus are shifted out of the optical regime upward toward the X-ray regime. Since cyclotron frequencies do not have subharmonics, and the centripetal acceleration at the light cylinder, ωc, is also higher than those of the Crab or B0540, J0537 cannot and does not produce strong optical pulsations However, assuming that the frequency 2nd derivative persists at -0.95×10-21 Hz s-2, J0537 will spin at 31 Hz in ~3,800 years and may be a strong optical pulsar by that time.As mentioned above, the single narrow peak of the pulse profile of J0537 is likely an indication that we observe its X-ray pulsations at least partially (the pulse width is ~10% of the period) as a result of thedistance-1 law, and its 2–10 keV pulsed X-ray luminosity could be lower than 2×1035 erg s-1 as estimated by [132].


## 6.7. The Positron Excess, WMAP “Haze”, and Fermi “Bubbles”

A beam of protons, with kinetic energies of up to 2.2 GeV or greater, will eventually produce electrons with similar energies. Electrons/positrons with even higher energies may result from photon scattering because the cross section varies inversely as the square of the particle mass and/or the leptons may, in turn, be further accelerated by magnetic reconnection, in woundup magnetic fields near the Galactic center, or other mechanisms [133], possibly to TeV energies, to produce the WMAP “Haze”/FERMI “Bubbles” observed in that direction [134, 135]. In addition, the SNR loss/relativistic injection of 56Ni positrons into the pulsar jet, which occurs because of the bipolarity of SNe and which also makes them unfit for easy cosmological interpretation, may show up as an excess in cosmic ray data [136–138]. This may offer a satisfying resolution for the apparent anomalous dimming of distant SNe explained in terms of local cosmic-ray abundances, without invoking the creation of electron-positron pairs near pulsars and their acceleration along “open” field lines which do not exist if one believes in the validity of the Sommerfeld equations [17, 18]. TeV fermions generated by SNe and/or pulsars would alleviate the short lifetime problem (~106 yr) associated with the Galactic center as a potential direct source. SLIP does not require pulsars to generate positrons in order for them to emit radiation, so the 10–100 GeV positron flux may not be dominated by contributions from local pulsars but may be provided instead by the supernovae that gave birth to them recently. The main difficulties lie in accounting for how and why the excess rises at energies above 10 GeV and below 100 GeV.Protons at multiple GeV energies will destroy the (relatively stationary) heavy nuclei they collide with, resulting in the release of free neutrons which can drive ther-process in supernovae. A density of 1024cm-3 in free neutrons has been invoked to drive this process, but SLIP can provide this near the center of the newly formed remnant. However, SLIP also clearly drives the r-process, whose element lines are visible in early Ic spectra, at the poles of SNe Ia/c, as described in Sections 1 and 5, where the influence of annuli well outside of the stellar core bypasses that same core to produce focused beams at the two poles, where C and O are both available. Detailed calculations are deferred for future efforts (see, e.g., [139]).


## 6.8. The SS 433 Jets

The extreme collimation of the initial beam and jet in SN 1987A and even the strong Hα seen in its spectrum near day 19.6 are suggestive of a similar situation in SS 433 (e.g., [140]), and a rapidly spinning pulsar has been proposed for the underlying central engine (e.g., [141]), although mass estimates for the compact object vary from 0.8 to 16 M⊙ [142–145]. The big problem with SS 433 is accounting for the mechanical power necessary to produce 1034 erg s-1 of Hα from recombination in two jets with velocities of 0.26c, which could amount to 1042 erg s-1 if each atom has only one recombination. Because of the few minute variability of the Hα [146, 147] with no variability of its velocity >1%, the standard method of its solution is to invoke a clumpiness of 105 in the jets titled “bullets” (e.g., [148]), so that each atom recombines many times (~102.5).Although [149] constrained the parameter space for the bullets, assuming the Hα production mechanism was an interaction of the jets with a B-star wind, the possibility of many excitations per atom, due to beamed radiation, was an admitted exception to the requirement for bullets. Of course this is exactly what SLIP does in the process, easily producing the kinematic and collimation properties of the SS 433 jets from an ms pulsar buried in hydrogen-dominated accretia, where L∞ at the source is redshifted to Lα in the mature jets (this is exact for β=0.28, but the actual β is lower [0.26], consistent with the finite bandwidth necessary for the jet acceleration mechanism to work), the usual SN boost mechanism being unavailable because of the lack of high Z accretia.If SLIP turns out to be a necessary mechanism to produce the jets and their Hα flux, then the rarity of SS 433 may be less, due to the wind from a Population I B star, than its association with a weakly magnetized ms pulsar, which clearly did not originate from a massive solitary star similar to what we think describes the primary. The best chance to detect a pulsar in SS 433 may be during a low state, should that ever happen, there having been no sign of any pulsar (e.g., [150]) in the high state it has occupied since the discovery of its bizarre behavior in 1978. A 2 ms pulsar could power the jets for 104 years if each atom produces ~20 Hα photons, not even accounting for any spinup due to accretion. It is more likely, however, that the spin period of SS 433 is larger because a 2 ms period is associated with the evisceration of SN progenitors by SLIP, and, in the presence of plasma at many RLC as happens in both SS 433 and SNe, will have a very large spindown, whereas the actual spin of SS 433 will settle to a rate where spinup from accretion is balanced by spindown due to SLIP. This rate will likely be a bit higher than what is typical for the luminous LMXBs, perhaps closer to a period of 5 ms, because of the lack of heavy elements loading SLIP (see Section 6.10).


## 6.9. Star Formation Avalanche in the Early Universe

Computer simulations of clustering in the Early Universe fail without the addition of some extra agent to increase the rate at which clusters form (see, e.g., [151]). The problem is that the agents which can be easily inserted into the codes, such as dark matter or dark energy, almost always involve controversial physics which may not be valid. Aside from such agents, the only known mechanism which is frequent and violent enough to possibly play the same role are the pulsar-driven jets resulting from the supernovae of the first stars.Although high velocity material will suppress star formation locally (M.-M. Mac Low, 2011, private communication), even the early Universe (z~7) is vast, and this same material will initiate star formation [152–155] at some distance from the pulsar in the two initially polar jets. Without spreading, the Mystery Spot column, σMS, of 0.5 gm cm-2 will penetrate even the early Universe at z=7, with 4% of the present day critical density in baryonic mass. Assuming, for the sake of simplicity, a linear (conical) spreading scale of ℓ0=3×1016 cm in an interstellar medium of density of ρB7=1.9×10-28 g cm-3 (4% of critical density at z~5001/3—1~7), and solving for the pathlength, ℓ, whereby a column of mass equal to the spread-diluted Mystery Spot column has been swept up in its last 10%, we get
(11)ℓ~200pc(ℓ03×1016)2/3(σMS0.5)1/3(ρB71.9×10-28)-1/3.The collimation of the Mystery Spot is not exactly known, but it cannot be as extreme as the104→5 of the initial beam/jet. However, it could easily amount to a few square light-days at a distance of 10 light-days. In that case, the plume would be about a few light years across at 100 pc. Along the way, shearing vortices may initiate star formation, with higher velocities at the larger distances from the endpoint.The actual situation may be much more complicated, as the decline of the jet collimation with time will impact the previously formed vortices. The stars formed by this process may also initiate another round of star formation as they move through the primordial ISM and so on, with each cluster retaining a tiny, though important, fraction of the initial jet velocity. Infant clusters in close proximity with nearly matched velocities may merge due to their sustained mutual gravitational attraction. In this way, the SLIP jets may initiate a star formation avalanche, possibly leading to minicluster and/or stream formation in a few million years, with no requirement for dark matter. The recent discovery by GALEX [156, 157] of velocities between close pairs of distant galaxies, which do not reflect their mutual gravitational attraction, may be the result of the separation velocities of pulsar-driven jets in their formation of star clusters. Again, detailed calculations are deferred for future efforts.


## 6.10. Pulsar “Recycling”

Pulsars with rapid spins and weak magnetic fields are commonly referred to as having been “recycled,” wherein these attributes are a result of a (usually) long dead pulsar undergoing an extensive interval of accretion from a binary companion which it acquired or already had, that as a result has increased its spin rate from the few-second period typical of a very old strongly magnetized pulsar to the ms period range, and as a side effect, either of the accretion or slow decay of the effective magnetic dipole by some other mechanism because of advanced age, or both, reduced its original several teragauss magnetic field by 2 to 4 orders of magnitude.Here, however, we have seen evidence that the spindown due to SLIP can greatly exceed any spinup due to accretion. Thus, the only way to tell if a pulsar has been recycled is by a mass substantially in excess of 1.3M⊙ (as is the case for J1903+0327),19 but even then, there’s no guarantee that the pulsar has suffered any net spinup, the result depending on accretion rate and history, spin rate, and magnetic field strength and configuration.To gain further understanding of this process, 1723 pulsars are located on the log period-period derivative plane in Figure12. On this plot, the connection between the “ordinary” pulsars in the upper right to the “recycled” pulsars in the lower left is a two-lane one-way highway. The top lane (higher-period derivative) contains all six of the globular cluster pulsars and nine Population I pulsars for the period range from 10 to 100 ms, while the bottom lane contains just Population I pulsars for that range. Metalicity and gravitational contamination are unlikely contributors to this pattern. The lanes have numerical slopes of about 1.5, meaning that if pulsars migrate to the right and slightly up in the lanes, the period derivatives gain 3 parts for every 2-parts-gain in period. By contrast, the same ratio is 3 to 1 for the young (4,000-year old) 16.1 ms PSR J0537-6910 (see Section 6.6), twice the slope of the two lanes (its effective magnetic dipole increases by 0.02% per year), so perhaps the pulsars in these lanes actually do migrate right and up along their respective sloped paths.Figure 12
A plot of 1723 pulsars from the ATNF pulsar database in the log period-period derivative plane. Nonbinary, nonglobular cluster pulsars are marked by “+” signs, nonglobular binary pulsars by×’s, nonbinary globular cluster pulsars by circles, globular binary pulsars by squares, four strongly magnetized young pulsars by pentagons, and the 2.14 ms signal from SN 1987A by an hourglass.Unfortunately, none of the six globular cluster pulsars in the upper lane within that period range have measured second frequency derivatives (which should be negative for this migration but which will also suffer extremely from gravitational contamination), so we cannot test the hypothesis that these pulsars are migrating on the slightly upward path. Of the 32 nonglobular pulsars in the lanes within this period range, 2 have negative, and 2 have positive, frequency second derivatives, so half of these four pulsars are not migrating within the lanes. With a period derivative of 1.88e-20, J1903+0327 lies on the low boundary of the short-period end of the upper lane. The offset between the two lanes corresponds to nearly two orders of magnitude in period derivative, but only one order of magnitude in field strength.Still, this offset between the two lanes is likely to be due to different accretion histories, provided, accretion does in fact reduce pulsar effective dipoles as postulated by [158, 159]. The simplest interpretation is that pulsars in the upper lane, containing about ten of eleven globular cluster pulsars with periods >8 ms, have never suffered accretion and were born fast and weakly magnetized.It is even difficult to argue in favor of a strongly magnetized origin for those pulsars in the lower lane, as it would seem strange that this population starts only from those “ordinary” pulsars with the smallest period derivatives, and neither from the much larger population of “dead” pulsars with even lower period derivatives.20 It may be more likely that this (lower) lane is from faster pulsars which accreted from binary companions to become LMXBs that have ceased to accrete, and are left there. Similarly, the upper lane may populate the main group just above its lowest point.So on average these pulsars slowed during their phase of high accretion, which is in line with the modest QPO frequencies seen in many LMXBs,21 and the high frequencies seen from most of the accreting millisecond X-ray pulsars, which have very low accretion rates.As the accretion rate diminishes when the binary companion begins to withdraw from its Roche limit, for whatever reason as long as this is a gradual process, the pulsar will have an era of spinup, possibly resulting in the pileup at 3–5 ms periods. Here, however, pulsars are found with period derivatives still lower than those of the lower path, thus requiring a population of neutron stars which were born only weakly magnetized and likely spinning in the millisecond range.Thus, these two discrete lanes connecting the “normal” pulsar group in the upper right to the ms pulsars in the lower left require a source of pulsars whose spin rates are faster than 200 Hz. Again, the most likely source to populate these paths is the source of fast-born 2 ms pulsars from the DD process. Since there are orders of magnitude more neutron stars generated by the DD mechanism than by Fe catastrophe, there should be a much larger reservoir of “dead” weakly magnetized pulsars than their “dead” strongly magnetized cousins. A study of the high-space velocities of solitary neutron stars as compared to the masses and low eccentricities of double neutron star binaries has also reached the conclusion of the necessity of two mechanisms to produce neutron stars [160], the DD process being the second (though overwhelmingly predominant) mechanism.


## 7. Conclusion

We have derived a self-consistent solution for the onset (~11ℓt-d), and depth (~13 ℓt-d), of the polar ejecta of the progenitor of SN 1987A, the energetics of its beam/enhanced UV flash (>1040 erg s-1), the kinetics of its jet (β~0.95 for ~10−6 M⊙), and the angle from the line of sight to the Earth (~75°). There is plenty of evidence for the absence of any strongly magnetized pulsar within SN 1987A, and such a pulsar may not have the rotational energy to account for the kinetics derived anyway. Thus, we have argued, through the paradigm of a model of pulsar emission (SLIP) from polarization currents updated supraluminally beyond the pulsar light cylinder [20], that SN 1987A, its beam/jet, “Mystery Spot,” and possible 2.14 ms pulsar remnant, are intimately related to SS 433, Sco X-1, and as many as 99% of LMXBs, GRBs, ms pulsars, and other SNe, including all Type Ia SNe. The SLIP model explains, in a natural way (1), the changes over time observed in the collimation of the SN 1987A beam and jet.The time lags, energetics, and collimation ofℓGRBs are consistent with those of 1987A’s initial beam, jet, and the inferred polar ejecta. When the bipolarity of SN 1987A is interpreted through this model, its pulsar clearly had ablated part of the ~10 M⊙ of ejecta, eviscerating the remnant by blowing matter out of its poles at speeds up to 0.95c or greater and enforcing a toroidal geometry on the remaining equatorial ejecta. Since there is no reason to suggest that this is not universally applicable to all SNe, this geometry has grave implications for the use of Type Ia SNe as standard candles in cosmology (see, e.g., [161] and Section 5). Lines observed from Type Ic SNe provide proof that SLIP beams drive the r-process at the rotational poles, in or near the progenitor photosphere (Sections 1, 5, and 6.7).  No other model can explain why such lines are only observed in SNe Ic (which are actually SNe Ia when observed away from the poles, and also when the r-process lines can not be observed) the reason being that C and O at the stellar surface are only available in SNe Ia/c.Because even weakly magnetized neutron stars buried within plasma can spin down at a rate which exceeds their ability to spin up from accretion by orders of magnitude, pulsars interacting with the rest of the remnant progenitor (if this rest exists) clearly cannot be ignored—they are the driving force behind the disruption of their progenitor stars in supernova explosions, in spite of the difficulty of detecting them within the remnant, now explained by the associated beaming. This has observable consequences; the start of the associated UV flash will show up within minutes, or even seconds, of the core collapse and neutrino flux, and the timetable of many SN 1987A events needs to be revised accordingly. In addition, the existence of a robust mechanism for disrupting progenitor stars means that the stellar mass at which core collapse continues on to create a black hole is much larger than previously thought—perhaps closer to 75M⊙ or even higher.There appears to be no need to invent exotica to explain GRBs—the SLIP model provides the young pulsar (or even a near-Chandrasekhar-mass white dwarf) with an initially tightly collimated beam as the central engine and makes the very specific and testable prediction that GRB afterglows are, in fact, pulsars usually spinning at 500 Hz in the proper frame.Beaming has always been a wild card for pulsars, and for the SLIP model, the beaming is effectively infinite—part of the radiation decays only as the first power of the distance, and the two cones of this beam (which subtend a solid angle of measure 0) will change in polar angle as plasma conditions change outside of the pulsar light cylinder. Beams and jets which are less than maximally collimated (those which originated from annuli of less than maximal radii) may not have enough concentrated energy to break through extensive surrounding material and rather help to lift it away from the neutron star. Rotating objects for which pulsations are not detected may simply be beamed in other directions. Thus, the disappearance, or persistent absence, of pulsations from rotating compact objects such as those which might lie within the Cygnus Loop (Section6.2), SN 1987A (Section 2), SS 433 (Section 6.8), and Sco X-1 (Section 6.4) and other LMXBs (Section 6.3) does not automatically imply that there never was a pulsar and/or that the compact object is a black hole the energy requirement for a pulsar being negligible because of the distance-1 law. Finally, it may be that all transient events observed in the very distant Universe, including the outbursts of QSOs, are seen because they have a similar inverted distance law, which is a result of a supraluminal excitation of one sort or another.Such restrictive beaming (θV≪1 and plasma at many RLC) explains, in a natural way, the nondetections of pulse frequencies from the luminous LMXBs, and less restrictive beaming (θV≅1 and plasma at few RLC) the intermittent detections of oscillations from the less luminous LMXBs—the accreting millisecond X-ray pulsars. The neutron star components of the LMXBs will settle to a spin rate where spinup from accretion, which has an absolute limit, balances spindown from SLIP losses, which increases with mass transfer rate almost without limit. Thus, the neutron star spin rate in LMXBs will vary inversely with luminosity (see Sections 6.3 and 6.10).As is the case for many other things, the devil in this Universe may lie in the details. Thus, while the most extensive simulations of the early Universe still require dark matter to form galaxies (see, e.g., [162, 163]), the jets driven by the pulsars resulting from the SNe of the first stars may provide the perturbations necessary to initiate the next generation of star formation in such a way as to include much of this generation in rapidly growing star clusters and/or streams (see Section 6.9). Thus, although it may take longer to form the first stars without dark matter, the formation of clusters via pulsar-driven jets may make up this time. The peculiar motions observed from distant galaxy pairs [156, 157], which would otherwise be expected to show motions reflecting their mutual gravitational attraction, may be due to the pulsar jet-star-formation process.In addition, because of the large systematic effects involved in measuring Type Ia (and all other) SN luminosities due to the unsuitability of their geometries (see Section5, [96, 102]), we simply cannot tell if they suffer any anomalous dimming with cosmological distances without further understanding of the SN process and the ability to apply this understanding to carefully select the distant sample. This was the only really direct evidence that the expansion of the Universe is accelerating, and now the scientific community must again question the existence of dark energy. Without it, in addition to the possible lack of the need for dark matter in the formation of star clusters, there may be no longer any numerical coincidence to support the role of dark matter in concordance cosmology. Recent observations of solitary ring galaxies have also cast significant doubt on the existence of dark matter [164, 165].Thus, aside from bizarre entities such as quantum entanglement currents, there is not much evidence for any dark “stuff” present in the recent Universe (z≤1) having any observable effect, and this has been due in significant part to a new understanding of the role of pulsar-driven jets. Still, the evidence is strong that Ωtotal=1 at the era of recombination (z~1000, e.g., [166]). However, in addition to kinematic redshift, gravitational redshift becomes important when looking back that far, and our knowledge of gravity is incomplete at best. Perhaps the best assessment of this apparent factor of ~20–25 difference in Ωtotal between the era of recombination and the more recent Universe is that it remains a deeper mystery.The path to the intimate and productive study of the SN and GRB processes is now clear; with high-time-resolution observations of GRB afterglows, through the selection effect of the inverted distance law operating across billions of light years, we let the Universe reveal the behavior of the responsible pulsars. It might appear that a Universe without the need for dark matter or energy, collapsars, hypernovae, pair instability SNe, super-Chandrasekhar-mass white dwarfs, frequent collisions of massive stars, and neutron star-neutron star mergers which make sGRBs is much less “exotic” than previously thought. However, pulsars, that is, clocks and minutes-old neutron stars to boot, which can be seen across almost all of this same Universe (which is never in equilibrium), including even core-collapse remnants of the first stars, and which may yield practically instant redshifts just from their pulse frequencies alone, may well suffice in explaining all of the issues which gave rise to the previously mentioned entities, are more in line with Occam’s Razor and are also, of themselves, extremely worthy of study.



---

*Source: 898907-2012-12-26.xml*