# A Noise-Immune Kalman Filter and Modelling forPedestrian Traffic Loads

Authors: Yanan Gao; Ningbo Peng; Jitao Tang; Yun Dong; Weidong Zhang; Peng Zhang; Jiarui Chen; Ye Zhu
Journal: Shock and Vibration
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

The definition of design load with walking crowd excitation on these slender structures is a significant problem to human-induced vibration. To capture the characteristics of walking crowd loads, this article researches both the ground reaction force and ground reaction moment for 36 healthy adults. Firstly, a oscillate system modeling walking leg is used to build a governing equation, which further transformed into the discrete state space. Then the Kalman method is applied to filter the noises for the measured ground reaction force, which can well remove the noises hiding in the measured signals. In addition, the Fourier series are used to model the ground reaction force and ground reaction moment, and the first six corresponding coefficients are obtained and analyzed. This work comprehensively explores the excitation force and moment from walking pedestrian feet. The result of this study provides the reference of load design for these slender structures such as footbridges, grandstands, or stations under crowd excitation.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The vibrations of slender structures induced by excitation due to pedestrian traffic remain a large challenge. Uncertainties associated with human locomotive behavior and the dynamic properties of the human body result in considerable complexity in describing the vibrations resulting from pedestrians. In order to explore the effect of pedestrian excitation on structures, Rainer and Pernica [1] first measured the dynamic load factors (DLFs) during walking, running, and jumping using an instrumented platform. The time history of force of walking people [2] showed that the ground reaction force (GRF) from walking excitation produced an M-shaped curve, which was fitted using a Fourier function [3]. Based on this research, Fan et al. [4] constructed a standard GRF model using the least-squares method. Although the GRF model was able to describe the excitation from walking pedestrians, the contributions from the pedestrian’s dynamic properties were not included. Kerr and Bishop [5] investigated the differences between human-induced loadings on a floor with that generated whilst ascending or descending a staircase. Hsiang and Chang [6] measured vertical ground reaction forces during fifteen gait speed and load carrying (five load positions and three speeds), which concluded that both speed and loading conditions can prompt the gait control system to adjust the gait pattern to maintain successful gait. Kala et al. [7] measured the vertical ground reaction forces and obtained the first four dynamic coefficients as 0.32, 0.09, 0.12, and 0.01 under 1.55 Hz step frequency and 1.4 m/s speed. Besides, some measurements on lateral ground reaction forces have also been implemented. For example, Ricciardelli and Pizzimenti [8] investigated the lateral forces exerted by walkers on a fixed floor and calibrated deterministic and stochastic lateral loading models on a footbridge; Ingolfsson et al. [9] presented the experimental analysis on lateral forces generated by the single pedestrians during continuous walking on a treadmill; Bocian et al. [10] carried a novel experimental setup for obtaining lateral forces by avoiding the implications of artificiality and allowing for unconstrained gaits. In addition, an elaborated self-sustained oscillator [11] was used to predict the lateral walking forces induced by walking pedestrians. Based on these measurement results, the walking forces have been extensively applied on the vibration analysis of these structures bearing crowd loads. Mouring and Ellingwood [12] early analyzed the influence of crowd loads on the dynamic response of floor systems. Pedersen and Frier [13] presented a stochastic modeling method, which was adopted for quantifying the probability of exceeding various vibrations in a footbridge design. Li et al. [3] proposed a vibration control method by using multiple tuned mass dampers carrying on the crowd-induced random vibrations of the footbridge. Besides, walking pedestrian can cause vibrations, and torsional shakes have also been observed [14]. However, the past traditional measurements on walking loads have mostly focused on the vertical ground reaction forces. The reaction forces from walking foot contain more information such as moments, but it is a lack of exploration.This work comprehensively investigates the three-dimensional spatial ground reaction force (GRF) and ground reaction moment (GRM) induced by walking pedestrian feet and extracts the corresponding mechanical characteristics, based on the measurements with a total of 36 healthy young adults. In Section2, an oscillator modeling with the walking single leg and the corresponding dynamic governing equation is developed to describe the measured forces. A systematical state equation is further developed so that its state equation and measured equations consider the contributions of the inertia, damping, stiffness, and foot forces. Based on the equation, the Kalman filtering method concentrating on the walking leg model is applied to remove the adverse noises from the measured rough data so as to improve the signal-to-noise ratio on the measured ground reaction forces. Some different noise level data are used to verify the effectiveness of the filter. In Section 3, a force platform is used to generate the GRF and GRM excitation from the 36 young adults, which comprised of 11 females and 25 males. The body and walking characteristics of the testers including mass, height, and step rate are statistically analyzed to present the mean, variances, and correlations among them. Based on the measurements, the Fourier series are applied to describe the measured forces and moments, and the corresponding coefficients including dynamic load factor (DLF) and dynamic moment factor (DMF) are presented for analysis. Furthermore, the statistical characteristics of DLF and DMF are comprehensively studied, so the loading models from the ground reaction forces and moments are established to describe the standard forcing models on these structures enduring on the walking crowd excitation.


## 2. Kalman Filtering Process

### 2.1. System State Equations

In order to establish the Kalman filter [15] for ground reaction force (GRF), the pedestrian is simplified as a mechanical model with one upper body and lower moving leg (Figure 1). The upper body occupies a lump mass m, and the lower leg models as a mass-less spring-damping oscillator. The stiffness and damping parameters of the leg are k and c, respectively. The GRF F is parallel to the axis of the leg, and it can be decomposed into three components as longitudinal GRF Fx, lateral GRF Fy, and vertical GRF Fz, to be measured. Besides, the ground reaction moments (GRMs) from foot in x, y, and z directions are longitudinal GRM Mx, lateral GRM My, and vertical GRM Mz, respectively. The axial compression displacement of the leg is denoted by u. The intersection angle between the leg axial and gravity directions is the sign θ, and the governing equation of the simplified mechanical system can be established as follows:(1)mu¨t+cu˙t+kut=ft,where the variables u¨ and u˙ are the corresponding leg axial acceleration and velocity, respectively, and ft means the external force along with the axis of the leg induced by body weight and it is shown in the following equation:(2)ft=mgcosθt,where g means the gravitational acceleration and its value is 9.81 m/s2 and the cos θ means the projection ratio of the vertical GRF Fz to the synthesis force F, which is calculated as follows:(3)cosθt=FztFt=FztFxt2+Fyt2+Fzt2.Figure 1
Forcing diagram of single-leg model.The governing equation of motion of the leg system in equation (1) can be transformed into a state-space equation as follows:(4)X˙t=AXt+Bft,where Xt, A, and B, respectively, are the state vector, state matrix, and input-to-state matrix under a continuous state condition, which is shown as follows:(5)Xt=utu˙t,A=01−m−1k−m−1c,B=0m−1.Multiplying the matrixe−At on both sides of equation (4) would result in(6)e−AtX˙t−AXt=e−AtBft.Substitute the identical equationd/dte−AtXt=e−AtX˙t−AXt into equation (6). Then, integrating equation (6) between the ranges from the time step t0totit0<ti would able to obtain the following equation:(7)Xt=eAt−t0Xt0+∫t0teAt−τBfτdτ.DefineΦt,t0=eAt−t0 and it is substituted into equation (7) and consider the ti+1 state can be changed as follows:(8)Xti+1=Φti+1,tiXti+∫titi+1Φti+1,τBfτdτ.The sampling frequency is assumed to be a constant, the input is also assumed to be linearly changed in the time domain ofti,ti+1, and it is approximately expressed as follows:(9)fτ=fi+fi+1−fiΔtτ−ti,where Δt=ti+1−ti is the sampling interval of a measured signal.Substituting equation (9) into equation (8) will result in(10)Xi+1=eAΔtXi+∫titi+1eAti+1−τBfi+fi+1−fiΔtτ−tidτ.Defineq=τ−ti and substituting it into equation (10) would obtain the following equation:(11)Xi+1=eAΔtXi+∫0ΔteAΔt−qBfi+fi+1−fiΔtqdq,=eAΔtXi+eAΔt−IA−1Bfi−Δt+I−eAΔtA−1A−1Bfi+1−fiΔt.The time intervalΔt is assumed to be enough small so that(12)eAΔt≈I+AΔt.After substituting equation (12) into equation (11), equation (11) can be rewritten as follows:(13)Xi+1=ΨXi+Γfi,where Ψ=eAΔt and Γ=BΔt, respectively, are the state matrix and state vector under a discrete state condition.The equilibrium equation in the lower supported point can be described as follows:(14)F=HX,where Η=kc is a measure matrix.Combining equations (13) and (14) and the noises, the system state equation of Kalman filter can be obtained as follows:(15)Xi+1=ΨXi+Γfi+wi,Fi+1=HXi+1+vi+1,where wi and vi+1 are process noise and measurement noise, which satisfy normal distribution as follows:(16)wi∼N0,Q,vi∼N0,R,where Q=EwiwiT and R=EviviT are the covariances of process noise and measurement noise, respectively.In the system state equations of equation (14), it is noted that Xi∈ℝ2 and Fi+1∈ℝ1 represent the 2-dimensional state vector and 1-dimensional measurement vector, respectively. ψ is the transition matrix and H is the measurement matrix. Compared with other filter methods, the Kalman filtering can effectively deduce the corruption based on the minimum mean square error criterion. In the algorithm, it needs to be time-discrete so as to realize the filtering process in a computer, and its solving flowchart is indicated in Figure 2 from the Appendix. The details with state estimation of X, estimation error ε, estimation covariance P, and gain matrix K in each time point are formulaically presented in the Appendix. It is noted that the parameters including iteration number i = 0, initial displacement u, body mass m, leg damping c, leg stiffness k, process noise covariance matrix Q, measurement noise covariance matrix R, and time computing interval Δt are prior defined and input. The Kalman filter is a linear system due to its development on the linear governing equation in equation (1). So the filter can only deal with linear filtering problems, and it is not suitable for some more complex nonlinear problems. In the iteration solving process, the initial covariance P0|0 and state estimation X^0|0 of X also need to be defined in advance and corresponding equation details on the filtering process are shown in the Appendix. The filtering result can be extracted in equation (A.9) and Figure 2 gives the flow diagram of the Kalman filtering process on measured GRFs.Figure 2
Flow diagram of Kalman filtering on measured GRFs.


### 2.2. Verification on Kalman Filter

Before treating measured GRFs, some artificial ground reaction forces generated by a bipedal robot model are applied to filter under different noise levels. The bipedal robot occupies 80 kg mass and other corresponding parameters can be found in the study of Gao and his cooperator [16]. The GRFs including Fx, Fy, and Fz are obtained from the typical simulation of the 3D walking process [16]. Figure 3 gives the filtering results and the vertical ordinate force F is divided by the body weight G. The blue and red lines are the untreated and filtered lines, respectively. There present four noise levels with 0%, 5%, 10%, and 20% of the synthetic force F with Fx, Fy, and Fz, whose corresponding filtering results are indicated in Figures 3(a) to 3(d), respectively. It is noted that the processed lines always situate the centers of the rough original data, and the filtered lines are very close to the shape of the noiseless composite F in Figure 3(a). The error between the filtered data and noiseless signal in Figure 4(a) shows that the increase of noise level would not cause a significant increase in the errors. The relative error ranges with different noise levels are mainly included in the range between −20% and 20%. The absolute errors are also given in Figure 4(b) and the lower and upper boundary of the rectangular regions denote the 25% and 75% of the total contents. The Kalman filter can perfectly find the accurate GRF without noise. Along with the increases of noise levels, the absolute errors also increased. However, the maximum error is less than 0.3 N and the proposed Kalman filter has good denoising properties on treating GRF data. In addition, the filter method always makes the filtered data approach to the accurate signal, which indicates the Kalman filter has well convergence and robustness.Figure 3
Filtering results with different noise levels: (a) without noise; (b) 5% noise; (c) 10% noise; (d) 20% noise.
(a)(b)(c)(d)Figure 4
Error in the filtering process with different noise levels: (a) relative error and (b) absolute error.
(a)(b)


## 2.1. System State Equations

In order to establish the Kalman filter [15] for ground reaction force (GRF), the pedestrian is simplified as a mechanical model with one upper body and lower moving leg (Figure 1). The upper body occupies a lump mass m, and the lower leg models as a mass-less spring-damping oscillator. The stiffness and damping parameters of the leg are k and c, respectively. The GRF F is parallel to the axis of the leg, and it can be decomposed into three components as longitudinal GRF Fx, lateral GRF Fy, and vertical GRF Fz, to be measured. Besides, the ground reaction moments (GRMs) from foot in x, y, and z directions are longitudinal GRM Mx, lateral GRM My, and vertical GRM Mz, respectively. The axial compression displacement of the leg is denoted by u. The intersection angle between the leg axial and gravity directions is the sign θ, and the governing equation of the simplified mechanical system can be established as follows:(1)mu¨t+cu˙t+kut=ft,where the variables u¨ and u˙ are the corresponding leg axial acceleration and velocity, respectively, and ft means the external force along with the axis of the leg induced by body weight and it is shown in the following equation:(2)ft=mgcosθt,where g means the gravitational acceleration and its value is 9.81 m/s2 and the cos θ means the projection ratio of the vertical GRF Fz to the synthesis force F, which is calculated as follows:(3)cosθt=FztFt=FztFxt2+Fyt2+Fzt2.Figure 1
Forcing diagram of single-leg model.The governing equation of motion of the leg system in equation (1) can be transformed into a state-space equation as follows:(4)X˙t=AXt+Bft,where Xt, A, and B, respectively, are the state vector, state matrix, and input-to-state matrix under a continuous state condition, which is shown as follows:(5)Xt=utu˙t,A=01−m−1k−m−1c,B=0m−1.Multiplying the matrixe−At on both sides of equation (4) would result in(6)e−AtX˙t−AXt=e−AtBft.Substitute the identical equationd/dte−AtXt=e−AtX˙t−AXt into equation (6). Then, integrating equation (6) between the ranges from the time step t0totit0<ti would able to obtain the following equation:(7)Xt=eAt−t0Xt0+∫t0teAt−τBfτdτ.DefineΦt,t0=eAt−t0 and it is substituted into equation (7) and consider the ti+1 state can be changed as follows:(8)Xti+1=Φti+1,tiXti+∫titi+1Φti+1,τBfτdτ.The sampling frequency is assumed to be a constant, the input is also assumed to be linearly changed in the time domain ofti,ti+1, and it is approximately expressed as follows:(9)fτ=fi+fi+1−fiΔtτ−ti,where Δt=ti+1−ti is the sampling interval of a measured signal.Substituting equation (9) into equation (8) will result in(10)Xi+1=eAΔtXi+∫titi+1eAti+1−τBfi+fi+1−fiΔtτ−tidτ.Defineq=τ−ti and substituting it into equation (10) would obtain the following equation:(11)Xi+1=eAΔtXi+∫0ΔteAΔt−qBfi+fi+1−fiΔtqdq,=eAΔtXi+eAΔt−IA−1Bfi−Δt+I−eAΔtA−1A−1Bfi+1−fiΔt.The time intervalΔt is assumed to be enough small so that(12)eAΔt≈I+AΔt.After substituting equation (12) into equation (11), equation (11) can be rewritten as follows:(13)Xi+1=ΨXi+Γfi,where Ψ=eAΔt and Γ=BΔt, respectively, are the state matrix and state vector under a discrete state condition.The equilibrium equation in the lower supported point can be described as follows:(14)F=HX,where Η=kc is a measure matrix.Combining equations (13) and (14) and the noises, the system state equation of Kalman filter can be obtained as follows:(15)Xi+1=ΨXi+Γfi+wi,Fi+1=HXi+1+vi+1,where wi and vi+1 are process noise and measurement noise, which satisfy normal distribution as follows:(16)wi∼N0,Q,vi∼N0,R,where Q=EwiwiT and R=EviviT are the covariances of process noise and measurement noise, respectively.In the system state equations of equation (14), it is noted that Xi∈ℝ2 and Fi+1∈ℝ1 represent the 2-dimensional state vector and 1-dimensional measurement vector, respectively. ψ is the transition matrix and H is the measurement matrix. Compared with other filter methods, the Kalman filtering can effectively deduce the corruption based on the minimum mean square error criterion. In the algorithm, it needs to be time-discrete so as to realize the filtering process in a computer, and its solving flowchart is indicated in Figure 2 from the Appendix. The details with state estimation of X, estimation error ε, estimation covariance P, and gain matrix K in each time point are formulaically presented in the Appendix. It is noted that the parameters including iteration number i = 0, initial displacement u, body mass m, leg damping c, leg stiffness k, process noise covariance matrix Q, measurement noise covariance matrix R, and time computing interval Δt are prior defined and input. The Kalman filter is a linear system due to its development on the linear governing equation in equation (1). So the filter can only deal with linear filtering problems, and it is not suitable for some more complex nonlinear problems. In the iteration solving process, the initial covariance P0|0 and state estimation X^0|0 of X also need to be defined in advance and corresponding equation details on the filtering process are shown in the Appendix. The filtering result can be extracted in equation (A.9) and Figure 2 gives the flow diagram of the Kalman filtering process on measured GRFs.Figure 2
Flow diagram of Kalman filtering on measured GRFs.


## 2.2. Verification on Kalman Filter

Before treating measured GRFs, some artificial ground reaction forces generated by a bipedal robot model are applied to filter under different noise levels. The bipedal robot occupies 80 kg mass and other corresponding parameters can be found in the study of Gao and his cooperator [16]. The GRFs including Fx, Fy, and Fz are obtained from the typical simulation of the 3D walking process [16]. Figure 3 gives the filtering results and the vertical ordinate force F is divided by the body weight G. The blue and red lines are the untreated and filtered lines, respectively. There present four noise levels with 0%, 5%, 10%, and 20% of the synthetic force F with Fx, Fy, and Fz, whose corresponding filtering results are indicated in Figures 3(a) to 3(d), respectively. It is noted that the processed lines always situate the centers of the rough original data, and the filtered lines are very close to the shape of the noiseless composite F in Figure 3(a). The error between the filtered data and noiseless signal in Figure 4(a) shows that the increase of noise level would not cause a significant increase in the errors. The relative error ranges with different noise levels are mainly included in the range between −20% and 20%. The absolute errors are also given in Figure 4(b) and the lower and upper boundary of the rectangular regions denote the 25% and 75% of the total contents. The Kalman filter can perfectly find the accurate GRF without noise. Along with the increases of noise levels, the absolute errors also increased. However, the maximum error is less than 0.3 N and the proposed Kalman filter has good denoising properties on treating GRF data. In addition, the filter method always makes the filtered data approach to the accurate signal, which indicates the Kalman filter has well convergence and robustness.Figure 3
Filtering results with different noise levels: (a) without noise; (b) 5% noise; (c) 10% noise; (d) 20% noise.
(a)(b)(c)(d)Figure 4
Error in the filtering process with different noise levels: (a) relative error and (b) absolute error.
(a)(b)


## 3. Treatment on Measurements

A force platform in Figure5 is used to generate the GRF and GRM excitation from the 36 young adults, which comprised of 11 females and 25 males. The measurement platform includes one force platform and two footpaths [17]. The 0.6 m square force platform has a thickness of 0.1 m. The entrance footpath is 1.5 m long and 0.6 m wide with a 0.5 m long slope for gait adjustment as the pedestrian enters the footpath. The length and width of the exit footpath are 1.0 m and 0.6 m, respectively. The thicknesses of both footpaths are the same as that of the force platform. All participants maintain natural relaxation as far as possible in the test process. When a subject leaves the exit footpath, he/she turns to walk towards the entrance footpath until the test ends. In the walking tests, all testers remained as natural and relaxed as possible.Figure 5
Measurement platform on ground reaction forces.The ages of these participants are inside the range of 18 and 21 years. Their physical indexes include body mass, height, and step rates as shown in Figure6. The body mass and height approximately obey normal distribution, and their corresponding means are 67.7 kg and 172.9 cm, and standard deviations are 11.0 kg and 9.2 cm, respectively. The nonlinear fit based on the least-square method between the body mass and height is indicated in Figure 7, whose relationship is h = 102.7 + 1.6 m–0.008 m2, which indicates that the height is slightly increased along with the increase of body mass. However, the increased range is decreased along with the increase of body mass. The variables m and h are body mass and height, respectively. The larger body mass tends to have taller height. Although a metronome is applied to guide the step rate of the walking participants, they have some difficulties to follow beat rates. All testers walk as slow as possible to keep a relaxed mental state, which presents in the distribution range of the step rates occupying the wider range of 0.6 to 2.4 Hz. Walking step rates (fs) approximately reveal the normal statistical distribution with the 1.3 Hz mean and 0.35 Hz standard deviation as shown in Figure 8.Figure 6
Statistical characteristics of body mass and height.
(a)(b)Figure 7
Fitting relationship between body mass and height.Figure 8
Probability distribution of step rate.The collecting device is a measure-analysis system on multidimensional forces produced by the Anhui Aili Intelligent Technology Limited-liability Company. The sampling frequency is 1000 Hz. The leg stiffnessk and damping ratio are input as 20 kN/m and 8%, respectively. The observation on the untreated signals indicates that the initial measured data mixed a lot of noises mainly due to the interference of electromagnetic equipment and structural vibration. All measured GRFs including Fx, Fy, and Fz are filtered by the proposed Kalman filter method. Figure 9 gives the typical filtering results from a male tester with 69 kg mass and 182 cm height. It is noted that the peak values from normalized GRF Fx/G in longitudinal, Fy/G in lateral, and Fz/G in vertical directions are close to 0.2, 0.1, and 1.1, respectively. The shape of Fx is firstly concave and then convex. The shapes of Fy and Fz are similar and look likely as the back of camel. The normalized GRMs in x, y, and z are shown in Figures 9(d) to 9(f), respectively. It is noted that the peaks from normalized moments Mx/G in longitudinal, My/G in lateral, and Mz/G in vertical directions are close to 0.12, 0.3, and 0.04, respectively. The peaks from longitudinal and lateral moments are far larger than the vertical moment, which means that walking foot mainly generates longitudinal and lateral moments.Figure 9
Filtering GRFs and measured GRMs.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)In order to find the influential effects of the step rate of walking, the statistical correlation between the step rate and the peaks of normalized measured forces by body gravityG was comprehensively analyzed. Table 1 lists the coefficients of all the fitting relationships. The maximum intercept value of the peak Fz/G (Figure 10(c)) is 1.04, which indicates that structure under a walking pedestrian endures the worst force impact in the vertical direction. However, the intercepts with moments from x and y directions corresponding to 0.11 in Figure 11(a) and to 0.14 in Figure 11(b) are much larger than those from the z direction corresponding to 0.03 in Figure 11(c). Pedestrian are more likely to trigger the torsions in the longitudinal and lateral directions than in the vertical direction for a structure. The maximum slope with GRFs is 0.027 in the vertical direction, which implies that the increase of step rate has the most significant impact on the vertical excitation. The larger speed would cause the larger excitation force, while the slope impacts from GRMs are different from the GRFs. The slope values with GRFs always keep a negative correlation with the step rates, which means that the faster step rate results in smaller moment. The module value from the longitudinal GRMs reaches maximum, and the faster step variations would bring the weaker moment. The statistical fitting results from normalized peaks of normalized GRFs and GRMs are indicated in Figures 10 and 11, respectively.Table 1
Linear fitting parameters.
Peak forcesFx/GFy/GFz/GMx/GMy/GMz/GIntercept0.160.0661.040.110.140.03Slope0.0150.0060.027−0.025−0.015−0.004Figure 10
Linear fitting between step rate and normalized ground reaction forces.
(a)(b)(c)Figure 11
Linear fitting between step rate and normalized moments.
(a)(b)(c)To further extract the normalized models for these forces induced by walking pedestrians, the Fourier series in equation (17) are introduced to describe the relationship between the normalized forces divided by body weight G and step rates, and its first six factors are calculated to ensure enough fitting accuracy. The DLFμj and DTFμj in equation (17) are defined as the jth dynamic load factor and dynamic torsional factor in the µ direction, respectively. All the factors from GRFs are statistically analyzed and linearly fitted by the step rate (fs), whose values are listed in Table 2. It is noted that the modular value from the 1st slope intercept in the fitting results is always larger than the other higher-order modular values The 1st DLF from GRFs always has significant impacts on these excitation forces. In addition, the 1st modules of slope and intercept from DLFz also keep far larger than values from DLFx or DLFy, which implies walking pedestrian induces the most unfavorable excitation in the vertical direction:(17)FμG=∑j=16DLFμjsinjπtT,μ=x,y,MμG=∑j=16DMFμjsinjπtT,μ=x,y,z.Table 2
Fitting coefficients on DLF.
SlopesInterceptsDLFxDLFyDLFzDLFxDLFyDLFz1st−0.0150.01−0.0260.00320.0281.1392nd−0.005−0.0040.009−0.10.0040.0133rd−0.0020.0020.050.0050.0060.194th−0.0003−0.004−0.03−0.0330.0050.0685th0.013−0.001−0.028−0.011−0.0050.0126th0.006−0.002−0.038−0.00210.0020.07Figure12 gives the statistical linear fitting results based on a least-square method between step rate and first six DLFs in the x direction. Its corresponding slopes are −0.015, −0.005, −0.002, −0.0003, 0.013, and 0.006, respectively. The first four slopes are negative, which means that the faster walking rate would alleviate the longitudinal excitation. The corresponding first six intercepts are 0.0032, −0.1, 0.005, −0.033, −0.011, and −0.0021, which are very smaller, which implies that the change of step rate has very slight impacts on the GRFx. Similarly, Figure 13 presents the linear fitting formulas between the first six DLFs and step rate, and the corresponding slopes are 0.01, −0.004, 0.002, −0.004, −0.001, and −0.002, respectively. The first positive slope is far larger than the other five slopes, which means that the faster walking rate would promote the lateral excitation. The corresponding first six intercepts are 0.028, 0.004, 0.006, 0.005, −0.005, and 0.002. Similarly, the first value is far larger than others. This once again implies that the main lateral excitation is contributed by the first DLF. The statistical linear fitting on the vertical DLFs in Figure 14 indicates that the first value of intercepts with 1.139 is far larger than the last five corresponding values and main vertical excitation induced by the first DLF. The first slope on the vertical DLF is −0.026, which implies the increase of step rate tends to a slight decrease in the vertical excitation.Figure 12
The fitting relationship betweenDLFxj and fs.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)Figure 13
The fitting relationship betweenDLFyj and fs.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)Figure 14
The fitting relationship betweenDLFzj and fs.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)All the factors from GRMs are statistically analyzed and linearly fitted by the step rate (fs), whose values are listed in Table 3. It is noted that the module value from the 1st slope whether intercept always keeps maximum than the other higher-order modules. The 1st DMF from GRMs always has significant impacts on these excitation forces. In addition, the 1st modules of slope and intercept from DMFx and DMFy keep far larger than values from DMFz, which implies walking pedestrian induces the most unfavorable torsional excitation in longitudinal and lateral directions. The statistical fitting on the DMFx is shown in Figure 15, and the first six slopes are −0.029, 0.003, −0.003, −0.002, −0.001, and −0.003, respectively. The corresponding intercepts are 0.11, −0.006, 0.02, 0.003, 0.0008, and 0.005. The first values of both the slopes and intercepts are far larger than other values, which means the DMFx1 plays a control role with the GRMx. The faster step rate tends to alleviate the torsional excitation in the longitudinal direction. Figure 16 continuously plots the estimated fitting results on the first six DMFy of the lateral moment GRMy and the corresponding slopes are −0.016, 0.006, 0.001, 0.0017, −0.001, and −0.002, respectively. The first six intercepts are 0.097, −0.015, 0.011, 0.0005, −0.0031, and 0.004. Similarly, the first values from both the slopes and intercepts are far larger than the other behind values, as well as the DMFy1 plays a control role on the lateral torsional excitation. The faster step rate tends to alleviate the excitation in the lateral direction. Besides, the fitting approximation on the vertical moment in Figure 17 also presents the first six slopes corresponding to the values −0.001, 0.0008, 0.0004, −0.0004, 0.0005, and 0.0002, which are very puny so that the variation of step rate has no effects on the moment excitation. Comparing with the longitudinal DMFx and lateral DMFy, the intercepts from the vertical DMFz are also very tiny and its maximum occurs on the first value of 0.007. The matching between the above fitting models with measurements indicates the proposed Fourier series models could well describe the excitation forces and moments from walking foot. Figure 18 gives the typical matching results between the fitting curves and measurements with a participant with 49 kg mass and 166 cm height.Table 3
Fitting coefficients on DMFs.
SlopesInterceptsDMFxDMFyDMFzDMFxDMFyDMFz1st−0.029−0.016−0.0010.110.0970.0072nd0.0030.006−0.0008-0.006−0.015−0.00083rd−0.0030.0010.00040.020.0110.00084th−0.002−0.0005−0.00040.0030.0005−0.000035th−0.0010.00170.00050.0008−0.0031−0.00056th−0.003−0.0020.00020.0050.0040.0002Figure 15
The fitting relationship betweenDMFxj and fs.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)Figure 16
The fitting relationship betweenDMFyj and fs.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)Figure 17
The fitting relationship betweenDMFzj and fs.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)Figure 18
The fitting results of the participant with 49 kg mass and 166 cm height.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


## 4. Remarks and Conclusions

The proposed Kalman filter is developed based on the linear governing equation, so it only can deal with the linear filtering problems. It is noted that the human mass, leg damping ratio, leg stiffness, and time interval are need to be predefined and input. The repeated filtering process verifies that the slight variables on leg damping ratio and stiffness have no influences on the filter results with the measured GRFs and it has robust stability. However, it is also noted that the value of leg damping ratio and stiffness should be defined as a reasonable range which can refer to the measured body parameters [18]. In addition, the proposed method only can deal with GRFs rather than GRMs, as it is developed on the governing equation with GRFs. Further, it can be developed to treat with the measured GRMs based on a suitable governing equation with GRMs. Moreover, the proposed Kalman filter only can handle the data in the time domain rather than the frequency domain, which would be further developed to treat with a frequency domain in future.The movements of walking crowd have considerable complexity, and their walking behaviors also have induced tough serviceable challenges on these slender structures. This work tries to explore the excitation mechanism from the ground reaction forces and movements by the measurements on a case sample comprised of 36 walking pedestrians. Then, a noise-immune Kalman filter is proposed to the treatment on the original ground reaction forces. The applications of the bipedal walking model and measured GRFs confirm that the Kalman filter can well reduce the measured noises. Further study is implemented. The Fourier series are employed to describe the excitation models on the measured GRFs and GRMs, whose first six factor coefficients are statistically fitted. A novel result shows that pedestrian foot mainly generates longitudinal and lateral torsional movements, and the vertical torsional movement is comparatively very slight. This work comprehensively explores the potential full-space loads induced by walking pedestrian, and it can provide references for the design of these slender structures such as footbridges, grandstands, or stations under crowd excitation.



---

*Source: 8848910-2020-11-24.xml*