# Synthesis of a New Polycarboxylate at Room Temperature and Its Influence on the Properties of Cement Pastes with Different Supplementary Cementitious Materials

Authors: Shuncheng Xiang; Yingli Gao; Caijun Shi
Journal: Advances in Civil Engineering
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

Three polycarboxylates with different comb structures (i.e., the same degree of polymerization in side chains but different main chains) were synthesized via radical polymerization reaction at room temperature. The effect of polycarboxylates on the surface tension and the flowability in cement pastes was determined. The best product was selected to study its effects on the hydration heat evolution, compressive strength, autogenous shrinkage, and drying shrinkage of cement pastes with different kinds and contents of supplementary cementitious materials. The results showed that with the increase of molar ratio between AA and TPEG to 6 : 1, we could synthesis the best product. When the water-binder ratio was 0.4, with the increase of polycarboxylates, the cement hydration heat evolution had been slowed down, and the more the dosage was, the more obvious the effect was. Adding supplementary cementitious materials to cement under the same experimental conditions also played a mitigation role in slowing down the hydration heat. When the water-binder ratio was 0.3, supplementary cementitious materials could increase the strength of cement by 24.5% in maximum; its autogenous shrinkage and drying shrinkage could be decreased, respectively, by 60.1% and 21.9% in the lowest.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Polycarboxylate contained many functional groups including -COOH, -SO3H, -NH2, -OH, and other groups. These groups could be adsorbed on the hydration products of cement and its surface particles. Not only the adsorption layer was formed, but it could also damage the flocculation of silicate particles. After incorporation of polycarboxylate, its electrostatic repulsion and steric hindrance could significantly change the role of force and solid particles of cement-liquid interface of the physical and chemical properties, and consequently, the particle distribution of cement, thereby affecting the flowability and other properties of cement pastes [1–3]. Currently, however, synthesis of polycarboxylate was commonly used in the heating method. The temperature was between 60 and 90°C or even higher. The product had relatively low solid content, so that in the synthesis and the transport process, the cost was increased inadvertently. Thus synthesizing polycarboxylate at room temperature had become a trend in the development of the industry.Supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) had become an essential component in the process of preparation of concrete nowadays, including slag, fly ash, silica fume, metakaolin, and other commonly used materials. Their effect on the performance of concrete was significant [4] including hydration heat evolution, compressive strength, autogenous shrinkage, and drying shrinkage.In this paper, several different polycarboxylates with comb structure were synthesized and selected to study their effects on the properties of cement pastes with different supplementary cementitious materials to provide some theoretical basis for structural design, synthesis, and selection of polycarboxylate.


## 2. Materials, Synthesis, and Testing Methods

### 2.1. Materials

Chemical composition and particle size distribution of PI 42.5 Portland cement, slag, fly ash, and metakaolin are available in Table1 and Figure 1. The average particle size of PI 42.5 Portland cement, slag, fly ash, and metakaolin was 36.96 μm, 20.30 μm, 33.69 μm, and 6.44 μm, respectively.Table 1
Chemical composition of PI 42.5 Portland cement, slag, fly ash, and metakaolin (%).
MaterialChemical composition (%)SiO2Al2O3Fe2O3CaOMgOSO3TiO2K2ONa2OTotalLossCement21.184.733.4162.492.532.83——0.5697.731.76Slag3313.910.8239.1110.04—0.101.91—98.891.12Fly ash54.2922.558.465.582.560.53—1.800.6796.442.37Metakaolin51.4036.170.510.050.64—0.130.150.1389.1810.37Figure 1
Size distribution of cement, slag, fly ash, and metakaolin.Chemical agents include the following: amyl alcohol ethoxylates (TPEG), with a molecular weight of 2400, analytically pure acrylic acid (AA), thioglycolic acid, toluenesulfonic acid, hydroquinone, benzoyl peroxide, polyethylene glycol-200 (PEG-200), hydrogen peroxide, ascorbic acid (Vc), ammonium persulfate, dibutyl tin dilaurate, and deionized water.


### 2.2. Synthesis

The structure of the synthesized polycarboxylate is shown in Figure2. To guarantee double bond molarity in the preparation and to control the concentration of free radical and molecular weight modifier, the molar ratio between acrylic acid and TPEG was adjusted. In synthesis, the solution containing 120 g of TPEG, 80 ml of pure water, 10 g of PEG-200 was fully stirred in a 250 ml four-neck round bottom flask. After that, another solution which contained 0.1 g of dibutyltin dilaurate, 1.2 g of toluene sulphonic acid, and a certain quantity of 30% hydrogen peroxide was added. In addition, two groups of solutions (group A and group B) were prepared for the next step.Figure 2
Structure of synthesized polycarboxylate.Group A: certain quantity of acrylic acid, sodium bisulfite, Vc or rongalite, and proper quantity of water.Group B: certain quantity of thioglycolic acid, ammonium persulfate, and proper quantity of water.Using a peristaltic pump to A and B components, a beaker with 2 ml/min rate dropped; the process was about 1.5 h. After adding some NaOH and adjusting the PH value to 6-7, we obtained three kinds of polycarboxylates called PCE-1, PCE-2, and PCE-3.


### 2.3. Testing Methods

#### 2.3.1. Surface Tension Test

We tested the surface tension of the polycarboxylate sample synthesized by using A-60 type automatic surface tension meter produced by Kono Industries, Ltd. in the USA. Take 50 g of cementitious material in a beaker with a fixed water-to-binder ratio of 0.4. Mix the polycarboxylate with 20 g of water and add it to the beaker. Stir at low speed for 2 min and then quickly for 1 min. Centrifuge the cement paste and take the supernatant to test its liquid surface tension.


#### 2.3.2. Flowability

According to GB/T8077-2000 “concrete admixture homogeneity test methods,” we did hollow cylindrical tryout test its initial flowability, paste flowability of 1 h and 2 h.


#### 2.3.3. Effect of Polycarboxylate and Supplementary Cementitious Materials Dosage on Hydration Heat Evolution of Cement Pastes

We used the “TAM Air” eight-channel isothermal microcalorimeter produced in Sweden test and recorded the hydration heat and heat release rate of cementitious material paste for quantitative analysis. We took 4 g cementitious materials in a beaker, wherein replacement of slag, fly ash, and metakaolin was 0 and 10%, solid content of polycarboxylate was 0, 0.1%, 0.3%, and 0.5%, and the water-binder ratio was set at 0.4.


#### 2.3.4. Effect of Polycarboxylate and Supplementary Cementitious Materials Dosage on Compressive Strength of Cement Mortar

According to Sections2.3.1 and 2.3.2, we choose the best polycarboxylate synthesized, prepare cement mortar in the water-binder ratio of 0.3 and sand-cement ratio of 2 : 1, wherein replacement of slag, fly ash, and metakaolin was 0, 10% and 20%, solid content of polycarboxylate was 0.8%–1.0%, and the flowability of cement mortar was kept at 140 mm or more, forming a set of 40 mm × 40 mm × 160 mm of the test specimen. We tested the triple mold, which was cured 24 hours with mold curing oven temperature maintained at 20°C ± 1°C and relative humidity of not less than 90%, and then removed the mold and put them into steam curing chamber wherein temperature was 20°C ± 3°C. At last, we measured the strength of cement mortar in 1 day, 3 days, 7 days, 14 days, 28 days, 56 days, and 90 days.


#### 2.3.5. Effect of Polycarboxylate and Supplementary Cementitious Materials Dosage on Autogenous Shrinkage of Cement Mortar

According to Sections2.3.1 and 2.3.2, we choose the best polycarboxylate and prepared cement mortar in the water-binder ratio of 0.3 and sand-cement ratio of 2 : 1, wherein replacement of slag, fly ash, and metakaolin was 0, 10%, and 20%, solid content of polycarboxylate was 0.8%–1.0%, and the flowability of cement mortar was kept at 140 mm or more. Then we measured and recorded autogenous shrinkage change from 72 hours after forming cement mortar, using bellows and a noncontact measuring probe.


#### 2.3.6. Effect of Polycarboxylate and Supplementary Cementitious Materials Dosage on Drying Shrinkage of Cement Mortar

According to JC/T603-2004 “cement mortar drying shrinkage test methods,” we prepared cement mortar in the water-binder ratio of 0.3 and sand-cement ratio of 2 : 1, wherein replacement of slag, fly ash, and metakaolin was 0, 10%, and 20%, solid content of polycarboxylate was 0.8%–1.0%, and the flowability of cement mortar was kept at 140 mm or more. Also, we used the best polycarboxylate from Sections2.3.1 and 2.3.2.


## 2.1. Materials

Chemical composition and particle size distribution of PI 42.5 Portland cement, slag, fly ash, and metakaolin are available in Table1 and Figure 1. The average particle size of PI 42.5 Portland cement, slag, fly ash, and metakaolin was 36.96 μm, 20.30 μm, 33.69 μm, and 6.44 μm, respectively.Table 1
Chemical composition of PI 42.5 Portland cement, slag, fly ash, and metakaolin (%).
MaterialChemical composition (%)SiO2Al2O3Fe2O3CaOMgOSO3TiO2K2ONa2OTotalLossCement21.184.733.4162.492.532.83——0.5697.731.76Slag3313.910.8239.1110.04—0.101.91—98.891.12Fly ash54.2922.558.465.582.560.53—1.800.6796.442.37Metakaolin51.4036.170.510.050.64—0.130.150.1389.1810.37Figure 1
Size distribution of cement, slag, fly ash, and metakaolin.Chemical agents include the following: amyl alcohol ethoxylates (TPEG), with a molecular weight of 2400, analytically pure acrylic acid (AA), thioglycolic acid, toluenesulfonic acid, hydroquinone, benzoyl peroxide, polyethylene glycol-200 (PEG-200), hydrogen peroxide, ascorbic acid (Vc), ammonium persulfate, dibutyl tin dilaurate, and deionized water.


## 2.2. Synthesis

The structure of the synthesized polycarboxylate is shown in Figure2. To guarantee double bond molarity in the preparation and to control the concentration of free radical and molecular weight modifier, the molar ratio between acrylic acid and TPEG was adjusted. In synthesis, the solution containing 120 g of TPEG, 80 ml of pure water, 10 g of PEG-200 was fully stirred in a 250 ml four-neck round bottom flask. After that, another solution which contained 0.1 g of dibutyltin dilaurate, 1.2 g of toluene sulphonic acid, and a certain quantity of 30% hydrogen peroxide was added. In addition, two groups of solutions (group A and group B) were prepared for the next step.Figure 2
Structure of synthesized polycarboxylate.Group A: certain quantity of acrylic acid, sodium bisulfite, Vc or rongalite, and proper quantity of water.Group B: certain quantity of thioglycolic acid, ammonium persulfate, and proper quantity of water.Using a peristaltic pump to A and B components, a beaker with 2 ml/min rate dropped; the process was about 1.5 h. After adding some NaOH and adjusting the PH value to 6-7, we obtained three kinds of polycarboxylates called PCE-1, PCE-2, and PCE-3.


## 2.3. Testing Methods

### 2.3.1. Surface Tension Test

We tested the surface tension of the polycarboxylate sample synthesized by using A-60 type automatic surface tension meter produced by Kono Industries, Ltd. in the USA. Take 50 g of cementitious material in a beaker with a fixed water-to-binder ratio of 0.4. Mix the polycarboxylate with 20 g of water and add it to the beaker. Stir at low speed for 2 min and then quickly for 1 min. Centrifuge the cement paste and take the supernatant to test its liquid surface tension.


### 2.3.2. Flowability

According to GB/T8077-2000 “concrete admixture homogeneity test methods,” we did hollow cylindrical tryout test its initial flowability, paste flowability of 1 h and 2 h.


### 2.3.3. Effect of Polycarboxylate and Supplementary Cementitious Materials Dosage on Hydration Heat Evolution of Cement Pastes

We used the “TAM Air” eight-channel isothermal microcalorimeter produced in Sweden test and recorded the hydration heat and heat release rate of cementitious material paste for quantitative analysis. We took 4 g cementitious materials in a beaker, wherein replacement of slag, fly ash, and metakaolin was 0 and 10%, solid content of polycarboxylate was 0, 0.1%, 0.3%, and 0.5%, and the water-binder ratio was set at 0.4.


### 2.3.4. Effect of Polycarboxylate and Supplementary Cementitious Materials Dosage on Compressive Strength of Cement Mortar

According to Sections2.3.1 and 2.3.2, we choose the best polycarboxylate synthesized, prepare cement mortar in the water-binder ratio of 0.3 and sand-cement ratio of 2 : 1, wherein replacement of slag, fly ash, and metakaolin was 0, 10% and 20%, solid content of polycarboxylate was 0.8%–1.0%, and the flowability of cement mortar was kept at 140 mm or more, forming a set of 40 mm × 40 mm × 160 mm of the test specimen. We tested the triple mold, which was cured 24 hours with mold curing oven temperature maintained at 20°C ± 1°C and relative humidity of not less than 90%, and then removed the mold and put them into steam curing chamber wherein temperature was 20°C ± 3°C. At last, we measured the strength of cement mortar in 1 day, 3 days, 7 days, 14 days, 28 days, 56 days, and 90 days.


### 2.3.5. Effect of Polycarboxylate and Supplementary Cementitious Materials Dosage on Autogenous Shrinkage of Cement Mortar

According to Sections2.3.1 and 2.3.2, we choose the best polycarboxylate and prepared cement mortar in the water-binder ratio of 0.3 and sand-cement ratio of 2 : 1, wherein replacement of slag, fly ash, and metakaolin was 0, 10%, and 20%, solid content of polycarboxylate was 0.8%–1.0%, and the flowability of cement mortar was kept at 140 mm or more. Then we measured and recorded autogenous shrinkage change from 72 hours after forming cement mortar, using bellows and a noncontact measuring probe.


### 2.3.6. Effect of Polycarboxylate and Supplementary Cementitious Materials Dosage on Drying Shrinkage of Cement Mortar

According to JC/T603-2004 “cement mortar drying shrinkage test methods,” we prepared cement mortar in the water-binder ratio of 0.3 and sand-cement ratio of 2 : 1, wherein replacement of slag, fly ash, and metakaolin was 0, 10%, and 20%, solid content of polycarboxylate was 0.8%–1.0%, and the flowability of cement mortar was kept at 140 mm or more. Also, we used the best polycarboxylate from Sections2.3.1 and 2.3.2.


## 2.3.1. Surface Tension Test

We tested the surface tension of the polycarboxylate sample synthesized by using A-60 type automatic surface tension meter produced by Kono Industries, Ltd. in the USA. Take 50 g of cementitious material in a beaker with a fixed water-to-binder ratio of 0.4. Mix the polycarboxylate with 20 g of water and add it to the beaker. Stir at low speed for 2 min and then quickly for 1 min. Centrifuge the cement paste and take the supernatant to test its liquid surface tension.


## 2.3.2. Flowability

According to GB/T8077-2000 “concrete admixture homogeneity test methods,” we did hollow cylindrical tryout test its initial flowability, paste flowability of 1 h and 2 h.


## 2.3.3. Effect of Polycarboxylate and Supplementary Cementitious Materials Dosage on Hydration Heat Evolution of Cement Pastes

We used the “TAM Air” eight-channel isothermal microcalorimeter produced in Sweden test and recorded the hydration heat and heat release rate of cementitious material paste for quantitative analysis. We took 4 g cementitious materials in a beaker, wherein replacement of slag, fly ash, and metakaolin was 0 and 10%, solid content of polycarboxylate was 0, 0.1%, 0.3%, and 0.5%, and the water-binder ratio was set at 0.4.


## 2.3.4. Effect of Polycarboxylate and Supplementary Cementitious Materials Dosage on Compressive Strength of Cement Mortar

According to Sections2.3.1 and 2.3.2, we choose the best polycarboxylate synthesized, prepare cement mortar in the water-binder ratio of 0.3 and sand-cement ratio of 2 : 1, wherein replacement of slag, fly ash, and metakaolin was 0, 10% and 20%, solid content of polycarboxylate was 0.8%–1.0%, and the flowability of cement mortar was kept at 140 mm or more, forming a set of 40 mm × 40 mm × 160 mm of the test specimen. We tested the triple mold, which was cured 24 hours with mold curing oven temperature maintained at 20°C ± 1°C and relative humidity of not less than 90%, and then removed the mold and put them into steam curing chamber wherein temperature was 20°C ± 3°C. At last, we measured the strength of cement mortar in 1 day, 3 days, 7 days, 14 days, 28 days, 56 days, and 90 days.


## 2.3.5. Effect of Polycarboxylate and Supplementary Cementitious Materials Dosage on Autogenous Shrinkage of Cement Mortar

According to Sections2.3.1 and 2.3.2, we choose the best polycarboxylate and prepared cement mortar in the water-binder ratio of 0.3 and sand-cement ratio of 2 : 1, wherein replacement of slag, fly ash, and metakaolin was 0, 10%, and 20%, solid content of polycarboxylate was 0.8%–1.0%, and the flowability of cement mortar was kept at 140 mm or more. Then we measured and recorded autogenous shrinkage change from 72 hours after forming cement mortar, using bellows and a noncontact measuring probe.


## 2.3.6. Effect of Polycarboxylate and Supplementary Cementitious Materials Dosage on Drying Shrinkage of Cement Mortar

According to JC/T603-2004 “cement mortar drying shrinkage test methods,” we prepared cement mortar in the water-binder ratio of 0.3 and sand-cement ratio of 2 : 1, wherein replacement of slag, fly ash, and metakaolin was 0, 10%, and 20%, solid content of polycarboxylate was 0.8%–1.0%, and the flowability of cement mortar was kept at 140 mm or more. Also, we used the best polycarboxylate from Sections2.3.1 and 2.3.2.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. New Polycarboxylate’s Surface Tension and Its Influence on the Flowability of Cement Paste

General polycarboxylate called PCA, synthesized three kinds of polycarboxylate called PCE-1, PCE-2, and PCE-3. Their surface tensions are available in Table2. Their surface tension was 52.8 mN/m, 46.70 mN/m, 42.33 mN/m, and 40.12 mN/m, respectively. Compared with PCA, PCE-3 lowered surface tension by 24.0%. Obviously, with the molar ratio of AA with TPEG increases, the surface tension was lowered; however, its viscosity and molecular weight were increased.Table 2
Surface tension of PCE-1, PCE-2, and PCE-3.
Samplen (AA)/n(TPEG)Solid content (%)Surface tension (mN·m–1)Water—72.9PCA1 : 12552.8PCE-13 : 12546.40PCE-26 : 12542.33PCE-39 : 12540.12From Tables2 and 3, we could see some differences in cement paste flowability by using polycarboxylate synthesized in a different molar ratio of AA and TPEG. Since the acid-ether ratio in the synthesis of PCE-1, PCE-2, and PCE-3 was 3 : 1, 6 : 1, and 9 : 1; meanwhile the ratio of acid-ether in PCA was 1 : 1, the adsorption points in their structures of PCE-1, PCE-2, and PCE-3 were much more than that of PCA. So, PCE-1, PCE-2, and PCE-3 have better surface tension and flowability than PCA [5]. In addition, their initial value changed a little, but the difference had become more and more obvious as time went by. From these two points, surface tension and paste flowability, we knew that we could synthesis better polycarboxylate by increasing the molar ratio of AA and TPEG to 6 : 1 or more.Table 3
Paste flowability of PCE-1, PCE-2, and PCE-3.
SampleDosage (%)Flowability (mm)Initial1 h2 hPCE-10.15280190135PCE-20.15315297287PCE-30.15305290275


### 3.2. Effect of SCMs on Hydration Heat Evolution of Cement Pastes Containing PCE-2

Figures3–10 show the effect of PCE-2 and supplementary cementitious materials on hydration heat evolution of cement mortar, wherein replacement of slag, fly ash, and metakaolin was 0 and 10%, solid content of polycarboxylate was 0, 0.1%, 0.3%, and 0.5%.Figure 3
Effect of PCE-2 dosage on the hydration heat flow of cement pastes.Figure 4
Effect of PCE-2 dosage on hydration heat of cement pastes.Figure 5
Effect of PCE-2 dosage on hydration heat flow of cement pastes with 10% slag.Figure 6
Effect of PCE-2 dosage on hydration heat of cement pastes with 10% slag.Figure 7
Effect of PCE-2 dosage on hydration heat flow of cement pastes with 10% fly ash.Figure 8
Effect of PCE-2 dosage on hydration heat of cement pastes with 10% fly ash.Figure 9
Effect of PCE-2 dosage on hydration heat flow of cement pastes with 10% metakaolin.Figure 10
Effect of PCE-2 dosage on hydration heat of cement pastes with 10% metakaolin.It could be seen that the heat release rate and total heat for the process of cement hydration had been slowed down after incorporation of polycarboxylates, and the greater the dosage had been used, the more obvious the effects would be [6, 7]. After the incorporation of polycarboxylates, it would be adsorbed on the surface of cement particles at the beginning of cement hydration. In addition, active groups in molecular chains of polycarboxylate (such as -COO-、-SO3-) and hydration ions (such as Ca2+) would combine together and generate unstable complexes in alkaline medium of cement hydration. In this way, cement hydration would be delayed and initial precipitation and growth phase of hydration products would be inhibited. Moreover, the effect was enhanced with increasing dosage of polycarboxylate [8, 9]. In other words, dissolve peak in hydration would be declined as shown in Figures 3 to 10. Furthermore, because the side chain in polycarboxylate with adsorbs, complexes, retards, and other effects on Portland cement, it inhibited the hydration of hydrated minerals and the growth of hydration products and cost more time to overcome the hydration energy barrier. So, the induction period of hydration increased and the second exothermic peak was delayed and weakened. Similarly, as the amount of polycarboxylic acid increased, the effect of this delay was more obvious and the second exothermic peak shifted to the right side [10].We also found that the incorporation of supplementary cementitious materials could reduce the hydration heat release rate and total release heat of cement pastes under the same experimental conditions. Free lime, gypsum, and aluminate in supplementary cementitious materials, which were quickly dissolved in cement hydration, would promote hydration on surface of cement and lead to a rapid heat release system [11]. However, further action between water and cement would be hindered because the particles of cement were coated by sulphoaluminate and calcium silicate produced in early times of hydration [12]. After that, the heat release rate began to rise again, reaching the highest value (the second peak). The reason was considered that the cladding layer under osmotic and crystallized pressure continued to be destroyed, and the reaction between water and cement was accelerated [13]. Due to the replacement of supplementary cementitious materials in cement, the content of cement was lowered that made the total heat release reduced [14]. In the second and the third phases in hydration, named induced and accelerated, respectively, due to the dilution of cement, the total heat release would be reduced with increasing the dosage of supplementary cementitious materials [15].


### 3.3. Effect of SCMs on Compressive Strength of Cement Mortar Containing PCE-2

PCE-2 was chosen to prepare cement mortar in the water-binder ratio of 0.3 and the sand-cement ratio of 2 : 1. Then, we measured the compressive strength of cement mortar in different ages.Figures11–13 show the effect of PCE-2 and supplementary cementitious materials on compressive strength of cement mortar in different ages. We could see that the largest increases of slag, fly ash, and metakaolin were 24.5%, 23.1%, and 24.3%, respectively. Because these three supplementary cementitious materials had a smaller particle size than cement, whose pores could be better filled, thus particle packing system became more close [16]. Moreover, supplementary cementitious materials had good shape effects, good mobility, and smaller adsorption of water, so they could improve the workability of the concrete mixture, which showed some water-reducing effect [17]. In addition, we also found that cement mortar with slag and fly ash dosage showed lower early strength, while the ones with metakaolin dosage showed higher early strength. This was due to the lower pozzolanic activity of slag and fly ash, which required some conditions to have a reaction with cement after seven days usually. At the beginning, supplementary cementitious materials just filled in the hydration products of cement. Until OH− went on eroding supplementary cementitious materials, they did not react at all. Thus, the strength of cement mortar with slag and fly ash was relatively lower [18]. As to metakaolin, this supplementary cementitious material was made in 600–800°C, its original structure of OH− and morphology were decomposed, destroyed, and broken down into pieces and poor crystallinity of Al2O3 • SiO2 relatively; the change in structure made metakaolin have higher pozzolanic activity [17, 18]. So, in early times of hydration reaction of cement, Ca2+, Al3+, AlO45+, and SiO44− in metakaolin would go into the solution, generating new hydration products and improving the early strength of cement mortar. The functional groups in the side chain bonded with the calcium ions in the mortar, which could produce the corresponding ionic cross-linked structure and lead to a significant increase in the degree of polymerization of the hydration product C-S-H [19]. Furthermore, the introduction of tricarboxylic groups and sulphonic acid groups in the molecular structure made the process of transforming the hydrated gel into crystal become slower. It was beneficial to form more complete crystals and improve the density of crystals, resulting in higher strength mortar [20].Figure 11
Effect of PCE-2 and slag dosage on the compressive strength of cement mortar.Figure 12
Effect of PCE-2 and fly ash dosage on compressive strength of cement mortar.Figure 13
Effect of PCE-2 and fly ash dosage on compressive strength of cement mortar.


### 3.4. Effect of SCMs on Autogenous Shrinkage of Cement Mortar Containing PCE-2

Figures14–16 show the effect of PCE-2 and supplementary cementitious materials on drying shrinkage of cement mortar in different ages. Some results from the figures could show that the incorporation of polycarboxylates and slag, fly ash, and metakaolin slowed down the shrinkage of cement to some extent, and the influence descending order was fly ash ＞ metakaolin ＞ slag.Figure 14
Effect of PCE-2 and slag dosage on autogenous shrinkage of cement mortar.Figure 15
Effect of PCE-2 and fly ash dosage on autogenous shrinkage of cement mortar.Figure 16
Effect of PCE-2 and metakaolin dosage on autogenous shrinkage of cement mortar.From Figures14–16, it could be seen that autogenous shrinkage was finished in less than 12 h substantially in hydration. Under the same conditions, adding supplementary cementitious materials into cement mortar could reduce its autogenous shrinkage effectively. The amount of reduction of slag, fly ash, and metakaolin was 31.1%, 60.1%, and 57.4%, respectively. Apparently, the dosage of slag, fly ash, and metakaolin could effectively reduce autogenous shrinkage of cement mortar.After being mixed with cement, slag, whose activity was low, would replace some parts of cement, which was equivalent to increasing water-binder ratio. Thus, it could improve the change of autogenous shrinkage caused by the drying effect. In other words, autogenous shrinkage was reduced and its effect increased when the content of slag was becoming larger. The speed and extent of participation of fly ash, which had slow pozzolanic activity in the hydration reaction relatively, was much lower than cement. In early times, most products of hydration came from cement only. Small products of hydration meant small amount of chemical shrinkage [21]. In addition, particles of fly ash could inhibit chemical shrinkage [22]. Above those, autogenous shrinkage of cement mortar with fly ash was decreased. Although metakaolin had reactive pozzolanic activity relatively, which could make many hydration products of cement in early times, on the other hand, this process could lead to intense heat as well. So, autogenous shrinkage would be reduced instead, due to the thermal expansion of hydration products [23]. In addition, after the metakaolin was calcined at high temperature, the pore size between the particles increased. This unique interlayer structure allowed metakaolin to adsorb more polycarboxylate molecules, resulting in a reduction in the amount of free water in the cement mortar mixed with metakaolin. The autogenous shrinkage of mortar would decrease sharply with the increase of metakaolin content [24].


### 3.5. Effect of SCMs on Drying Shrinkage of Cement Mortar Containing PCE-2

PCE-2 was chosen to prepare cement mortar in the water-binder ratio of 0.3 and sand-cement ratio of 2 : 1. Then we measured drying shrinkage of cement mortar in different ages.As it could be seen from Figures17–19, adding supplementary cementitious materials into cement mortar could reduce its drying shrinkage effectively. The amount of reduction of slag, fly ash, and metakaolin was 8.8%, 21.2%, and 21.9%, respectively. But the reason why these three kinds of supplementary cementitious materials could achieve was different slightly.Figure 17
Effect of PCE-2 and slag dosage on drying shrinkage of cement mortar.Figure 18
Effect of PCE-2 and fly ash dosage on drying shrinkage of cement mortar.Figure 19
Effect of PCE-2 and metakaolin dosage on drying shrinkage of cement mortar.Being similar to the particle shape of cement, slag had irregular particles, small fineness, vitreous, low degree of crystallinity, particle disordered arrangement, and large specific surface area. After incorporation, it could refine the pore structure of paste, reduce the pore connectivity, and increase the difficulty of moisture migration under dry conditions, which had a positive effect on drying shrinkage, and thus drying shrinkage was decreased.Fly ash had spherical particles, strong adsorption, fluffy structures, and microporous. The speed and extent of involvement of fly ash in cement hydration reaction were much lower than its pozzolanic activity [25, 26]. It needed to stimulate with cement hydration products in the early times of hydration. Thus the inhibition of drying shrinkage with fly ash on the hydration system was very obvious. Although with the increase of fly ash, effective water-binder ratio cement mortar increased, at the same time, the elastic modulus of fly ash particles was also higher than the cement’s, which played the role of limiting the slurry shrinkage in cement mortar. All those above were so effective in reducing drying shrinkage in cement mortar with fly ash [27, 28].After being calcined at high temperature, the original structure of OH- and morphology in metakaolin was decomposed, destroyed, and broken down into pieces and poor crystallinity of Al2O3 • SiO2 relatively, whose change in structure of metakaolin made this kind of higher pozzolanic activity [29]. With the dosage of metakaolin, its pozzolanic and aggregate activity could effectively reduce content and evaporation of free water in the interspace of cement mortar, making migration become difficult to moisture, thus reducing drying shrinkage development at last [30, 31].


## 3.1. New Polycarboxylate’s Surface Tension and Its Influence on the Flowability of Cement Paste

General polycarboxylate called PCA, synthesized three kinds of polycarboxylate called PCE-1, PCE-2, and PCE-3. Their surface tensions are available in Table2. Their surface tension was 52.8 mN/m, 46.70 mN/m, 42.33 mN/m, and 40.12 mN/m, respectively. Compared with PCA, PCE-3 lowered surface tension by 24.0%. Obviously, with the molar ratio of AA with TPEG increases, the surface tension was lowered; however, its viscosity and molecular weight were increased.Table 2
Surface tension of PCE-1, PCE-2, and PCE-3.
Samplen (AA)/n(TPEG)Solid content (%)Surface tension (mN·m–1)Water—72.9PCA1 : 12552.8PCE-13 : 12546.40PCE-26 : 12542.33PCE-39 : 12540.12From Tables2 and 3, we could see some differences in cement paste flowability by using polycarboxylate synthesized in a different molar ratio of AA and TPEG. Since the acid-ether ratio in the synthesis of PCE-1, PCE-2, and PCE-3 was 3 : 1, 6 : 1, and 9 : 1; meanwhile the ratio of acid-ether in PCA was 1 : 1, the adsorption points in their structures of PCE-1, PCE-2, and PCE-3 were much more than that of PCA. So, PCE-1, PCE-2, and PCE-3 have better surface tension and flowability than PCA [5]. In addition, their initial value changed a little, but the difference had become more and more obvious as time went by. From these two points, surface tension and paste flowability, we knew that we could synthesis better polycarboxylate by increasing the molar ratio of AA and TPEG to 6 : 1 or more.Table 3
Paste flowability of PCE-1, PCE-2, and PCE-3.
SampleDosage (%)Flowability (mm)Initial1 h2 hPCE-10.15280190135PCE-20.15315297287PCE-30.15305290275


## 3.2. Effect of SCMs on Hydration Heat Evolution of Cement Pastes Containing PCE-2

Figures3–10 show the effect of PCE-2 and supplementary cementitious materials on hydration heat evolution of cement mortar, wherein replacement of slag, fly ash, and metakaolin was 0 and 10%, solid content of polycarboxylate was 0, 0.1%, 0.3%, and 0.5%.Figure 3
Effect of PCE-2 dosage on the hydration heat flow of cement pastes.Figure 4
Effect of PCE-2 dosage on hydration heat of cement pastes.Figure 5
Effect of PCE-2 dosage on hydration heat flow of cement pastes with 10% slag.Figure 6
Effect of PCE-2 dosage on hydration heat of cement pastes with 10% slag.Figure 7
Effect of PCE-2 dosage on hydration heat flow of cement pastes with 10% fly ash.Figure 8
Effect of PCE-2 dosage on hydration heat of cement pastes with 10% fly ash.Figure 9
Effect of PCE-2 dosage on hydration heat flow of cement pastes with 10% metakaolin.Figure 10
Effect of PCE-2 dosage on hydration heat of cement pastes with 10% metakaolin.It could be seen that the heat release rate and total heat for the process of cement hydration had been slowed down after incorporation of polycarboxylates, and the greater the dosage had been used, the more obvious the effects would be [6, 7]. After the incorporation of polycarboxylates, it would be adsorbed on the surface of cement particles at the beginning of cement hydration. In addition, active groups in molecular chains of polycarboxylate (such as -COO-、-SO3-) and hydration ions (such as Ca2+) would combine together and generate unstable complexes in alkaline medium of cement hydration. In this way, cement hydration would be delayed and initial precipitation and growth phase of hydration products would be inhibited. Moreover, the effect was enhanced with increasing dosage of polycarboxylate [8, 9]. In other words, dissolve peak in hydration would be declined as shown in Figures 3 to 10. Furthermore, because the side chain in polycarboxylate with adsorbs, complexes, retards, and other effects on Portland cement, it inhibited the hydration of hydrated minerals and the growth of hydration products and cost more time to overcome the hydration energy barrier. So, the induction period of hydration increased and the second exothermic peak was delayed and weakened. Similarly, as the amount of polycarboxylic acid increased, the effect of this delay was more obvious and the second exothermic peak shifted to the right side [10].We also found that the incorporation of supplementary cementitious materials could reduce the hydration heat release rate and total release heat of cement pastes under the same experimental conditions. Free lime, gypsum, and aluminate in supplementary cementitious materials, which were quickly dissolved in cement hydration, would promote hydration on surface of cement and lead to a rapid heat release system [11]. However, further action between water and cement would be hindered because the particles of cement were coated by sulphoaluminate and calcium silicate produced in early times of hydration [12]. After that, the heat release rate began to rise again, reaching the highest value (the second peak). The reason was considered that the cladding layer under osmotic and crystallized pressure continued to be destroyed, and the reaction between water and cement was accelerated [13]. Due to the replacement of supplementary cementitious materials in cement, the content of cement was lowered that made the total heat release reduced [14]. In the second and the third phases in hydration, named induced and accelerated, respectively, due to the dilution of cement, the total heat release would be reduced with increasing the dosage of supplementary cementitious materials [15].


## 3.3. Effect of SCMs on Compressive Strength of Cement Mortar Containing PCE-2

PCE-2 was chosen to prepare cement mortar in the water-binder ratio of 0.3 and the sand-cement ratio of 2 : 1. Then, we measured the compressive strength of cement mortar in different ages.Figures11–13 show the effect of PCE-2 and supplementary cementitious materials on compressive strength of cement mortar in different ages. We could see that the largest increases of slag, fly ash, and metakaolin were 24.5%, 23.1%, and 24.3%, respectively. Because these three supplementary cementitious materials had a smaller particle size than cement, whose pores could be better filled, thus particle packing system became more close [16]. Moreover, supplementary cementitious materials had good shape effects, good mobility, and smaller adsorption of water, so they could improve the workability of the concrete mixture, which showed some water-reducing effect [17]. In addition, we also found that cement mortar with slag and fly ash dosage showed lower early strength, while the ones with metakaolin dosage showed higher early strength. This was due to the lower pozzolanic activity of slag and fly ash, which required some conditions to have a reaction with cement after seven days usually. At the beginning, supplementary cementitious materials just filled in the hydration products of cement. Until OH− went on eroding supplementary cementitious materials, they did not react at all. Thus, the strength of cement mortar with slag and fly ash was relatively lower [18]. As to metakaolin, this supplementary cementitious material was made in 600–800°C, its original structure of OH− and morphology were decomposed, destroyed, and broken down into pieces and poor crystallinity of Al2O3 • SiO2 relatively; the change in structure made metakaolin have higher pozzolanic activity [17, 18]. So, in early times of hydration reaction of cement, Ca2+, Al3+, AlO45+, and SiO44− in metakaolin would go into the solution, generating new hydration products and improving the early strength of cement mortar. The functional groups in the side chain bonded with the calcium ions in the mortar, which could produce the corresponding ionic cross-linked structure and lead to a significant increase in the degree of polymerization of the hydration product C-S-H [19]. Furthermore, the introduction of tricarboxylic groups and sulphonic acid groups in the molecular structure made the process of transforming the hydrated gel into crystal become slower. It was beneficial to form more complete crystals and improve the density of crystals, resulting in higher strength mortar [20].Figure 11
Effect of PCE-2 and slag dosage on the compressive strength of cement mortar.Figure 12
Effect of PCE-2 and fly ash dosage on compressive strength of cement mortar.Figure 13
Effect of PCE-2 and fly ash dosage on compressive strength of cement mortar.


## 3.4. Effect of SCMs on Autogenous Shrinkage of Cement Mortar Containing PCE-2

Figures14–16 show the effect of PCE-2 and supplementary cementitious materials on drying shrinkage of cement mortar in different ages. Some results from the figures could show that the incorporation of polycarboxylates and slag, fly ash, and metakaolin slowed down the shrinkage of cement to some extent, and the influence descending order was fly ash ＞ metakaolin ＞ slag.Figure 14
Effect of PCE-2 and slag dosage on autogenous shrinkage of cement mortar.Figure 15
Effect of PCE-2 and fly ash dosage on autogenous shrinkage of cement mortar.Figure 16
Effect of PCE-2 and metakaolin dosage on autogenous shrinkage of cement mortar.From Figures14–16, it could be seen that autogenous shrinkage was finished in less than 12 h substantially in hydration. Under the same conditions, adding supplementary cementitious materials into cement mortar could reduce its autogenous shrinkage effectively. The amount of reduction of slag, fly ash, and metakaolin was 31.1%, 60.1%, and 57.4%, respectively. Apparently, the dosage of slag, fly ash, and metakaolin could effectively reduce autogenous shrinkage of cement mortar.After being mixed with cement, slag, whose activity was low, would replace some parts of cement, which was equivalent to increasing water-binder ratio. Thus, it could improve the change of autogenous shrinkage caused by the drying effect. In other words, autogenous shrinkage was reduced and its effect increased when the content of slag was becoming larger. The speed and extent of participation of fly ash, which had slow pozzolanic activity in the hydration reaction relatively, was much lower than cement. In early times, most products of hydration came from cement only. Small products of hydration meant small amount of chemical shrinkage [21]. In addition, particles of fly ash could inhibit chemical shrinkage [22]. Above those, autogenous shrinkage of cement mortar with fly ash was decreased. Although metakaolin had reactive pozzolanic activity relatively, which could make many hydration products of cement in early times, on the other hand, this process could lead to intense heat as well. So, autogenous shrinkage would be reduced instead, due to the thermal expansion of hydration products [23]. In addition, after the metakaolin was calcined at high temperature, the pore size between the particles increased. This unique interlayer structure allowed metakaolin to adsorb more polycarboxylate molecules, resulting in a reduction in the amount of free water in the cement mortar mixed with metakaolin. The autogenous shrinkage of mortar would decrease sharply with the increase of metakaolin content [24].


## 3.5. Effect of SCMs on Drying Shrinkage of Cement Mortar Containing PCE-2

PCE-2 was chosen to prepare cement mortar in the water-binder ratio of 0.3 and sand-cement ratio of 2 : 1. Then we measured drying shrinkage of cement mortar in different ages.As it could be seen from Figures17–19, adding supplementary cementitious materials into cement mortar could reduce its drying shrinkage effectively. The amount of reduction of slag, fly ash, and metakaolin was 8.8%, 21.2%, and 21.9%, respectively. But the reason why these three kinds of supplementary cementitious materials could achieve was different slightly.Figure 17
Effect of PCE-2 and slag dosage on drying shrinkage of cement mortar.Figure 18
Effect of PCE-2 and fly ash dosage on drying shrinkage of cement mortar.Figure 19
Effect of PCE-2 and metakaolin dosage on drying shrinkage of cement mortar.Being similar to the particle shape of cement, slag had irregular particles, small fineness, vitreous, low degree of crystallinity, particle disordered arrangement, and large specific surface area. After incorporation, it could refine the pore structure of paste, reduce the pore connectivity, and increase the difficulty of moisture migration under dry conditions, which had a positive effect on drying shrinkage, and thus drying shrinkage was decreased.Fly ash had spherical particles, strong adsorption, fluffy structures, and microporous. The speed and extent of involvement of fly ash in cement hydration reaction were much lower than its pozzolanic activity [25, 26]. It needed to stimulate with cement hydration products in the early times of hydration. Thus the inhibition of drying shrinkage with fly ash on the hydration system was very obvious. Although with the increase of fly ash, effective water-binder ratio cement mortar increased, at the same time, the elastic modulus of fly ash particles was also higher than the cement’s, which played the role of limiting the slurry shrinkage in cement mortar. All those above were so effective in reducing drying shrinkage in cement mortar with fly ash [27, 28].After being calcined at high temperature, the original structure of OH- and morphology in metakaolin was decomposed, destroyed, and broken down into pieces and poor crystallinity of Al2O3 • SiO2 relatively, whose change in structure of metakaolin made this kind of higher pozzolanic activity [29]. With the dosage of metakaolin, its pozzolanic and aggregate activity could effectively reduce content and evaporation of free water in the interspace of cement mortar, making migration become difficult to moisture, thus reducing drying shrinkage development at last [30, 31].


## 4. Conclusion

In this article, the influence of some factors on the synthesis of polycarboxylate at room temperature was discussed. The best product was selected to study its effects on the hydration heat evolution, compressive strength, autogenous shrinkage, and drying shrinkage of cement pastes with different kinds and contents of supplementary cementitious materials. The following conclusions could be obtained based on the above experimental results and discussions:(1)
From the experimental results, appropriately increasing the molar ratio of AA with TPEG contributed to the surface tension of polycarboxylates, cement paste flowability, and the optimum mixing ratio was 6 : 1.(2)
After incorporation of polycarboxylates, heat flow and total heat for the process of cement hydration had been slowed down. The greater the dosage used, the more obvious the effects would be. The dosage of supplementary cementitious materials could reduce hydration heat release rate and the total release heat of cement pastes.(3)
The compressive strength of cement mortar after the age of 90 days was greatly contributed by supplementary cementitious materials. Meanwhile, the largest increases of slag, fly ash, and metakaolin were 24.5%, 23.1%, and 24.3%, respectively.(4)
The incorporation of polycarboxylates and slag, fly ash, metakaolin slowed down the autogenous shrinkage of cement mortar, and the influence descending order was fly ash ＞ metakaolin ＞ slag.(5)
Adding supplementary cementitious materials into cement mortar could reduce its drying shrinkage. The largest decrease of slag, fly ash, and metakaolin was 8.8%, 21.2%, and 21.9%.



---

*Source: 8854422-2020-06-16.xml*