# Synthesis, Crystal Structures, and Antimicrobial and Antitumor Studies of Two Zinc(II) Complexes with Pyridine Thiazole Derivatives

Authors: Zou Xun-Zhong; Feng An-Sheng; Zeng Fu-Ran; Lai Min-Cheng; Liao Yan-Zhi; Mei Meng; Li Yu
Journal: Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

Two pyridine thiazole derivatives, namely, 4-(pyridin-2-yl)-2-(2-(pyridin-2-ylmethylene)hydrazinyl)thiazole (L1) and 4-(pyridin-3-yl)-2-(2-(pyridin-4-ylmethylene)hydrazinyl)thiazole (L2), were afforded by a cyclization reaction betweenα-haloketone and thioamide, and their Zn(II) complexes were prepared by the reaction of ligands and corresponding metal salts, respectively, and characterized by X-ray diffraction and elemental analysis. Both crystals were obtained by ether diffusion and crystallized in a monoclinic system. The in vitro antimicrobial activity of the Zn(II) complexes and ligands was screened using the microplate reader method, and in vitro antitumor activities of the complexes were evaluated by MTT, with a view to developing new improved bioactive materials with novel properties. The biological activity studies of the compounds showed that the metal complexes were more active than the free ligands, and some compounds had absolute specificity for certain bacteria or cancer cell lines.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Thiazole ring and pyridine ring are structural units with extensive biological activities, such as antibacterial [1], antitumor [2], antiviral [3], anti-inflammatory [4], and hypoglycemic [5] activities. Hydrazone compounds have also attracted much attention in various fields, especially in pesticide and pharmaceutical fields due to their unique physiological activity and strong coordination ability [6, 7]. Therefore, the introduction of pyridine hydrazone group into molecule containing thiazole is likely to produce stronger biological activity according to the synergistic effect of drug combination principles. Because of the particularity of the structures, thiazole ligands containing pyridine and hydrazone groups with multiple coordination sites often have good metal coordination ability which can form stable complexes with different transition metal [8, 9]. Besides, the spatial conformation of the complex is determined by its coordinated modes, which have great influence on the biological properties of the compound [10–12]; the studies on transitional metal compounds of pyridine thiazole ligands have been of great significance. Co(III) complexes based on (1,3-selenazol-2-yl)- and (1,3-thiazol-2-yl)hydrazone were reported to have potent antimicrobial and antioxidant activity [13]. To further study the biological, physical, and chemical activities of these compounds and their Zn(II) complexes, two thiazole derivatives, L1 and L2, were synthesized by the cyclization reaction of pyridyl thiosemicarbazide and α-bromopyridine (Scheme 1). Complexes [Zn(L1)2(TsO)2] (1) and [Zn(HL2)Br3]⋅2DMF (2) were obtained by coordinating the ligands with Zn(TsO)2 and ZnBr2, respectively. The ligand L2 and complexes were characterized by elemental analysis (EA) and single-crystal diffraction. The inhibitory activities of these compounds against seven pathogenic bacterial strains, namely, Escherichia coli (E. coli, ATCC 25922), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus, CMCC(B) 26003), Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium, CMCC(B) 50071), Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis, ATCC 6633), Shigella flexneri (Sh. flexneri, CMCC(B) 51572), Vibrio parahaemolyticus (V. parahaemolyticus, ATCC 17802), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa, ATCC 9027), and four human cancer cell lines (human lung cancer cells A549, human breast cancer cells BT-20, human ovarian cells MCF-7, and human osteosarcoma cells U20S), were tested.Scheme 1
Synthesis route of ligands and complexes 1-2.


## 2. Experimental Setup

### 2.1. Materials and Methods

All the starting materials and reagents in this work were obtained commercially and used without further purification. Elemental analyses were performed on a vario EL analyzer (Elementar, Germany) and IR spectra on an Avatar 330 FT-IR spectrometer (Thermo Nicolet) with potassium bromide pellets.1H NMR spectra were determined by Bruker AVANCE-III 500 at 300–400 MHz, and MestReNova software was used for data analysis. Chemical shifts (δ values) and coupling constants (J values) are reported as ppm and Hz, respectively. The following abbreviations are used: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; m, multiplet; br, broad. Antimicrobial tests were performed on a SpectraMax® ABS Absorbance Reader (Molecular Devices). Single-crystal X-ray diffraction was carried out by a Bruker Smart Apex-CCD and Agilent SuperNova diffractometer. The UV-Vis spectra were recorded on an Agilent Cary 60 spectrophotometer.


### 2.2. Synthesis of Ligands L1 and L2

A mixture of 2-pyridine formaldehyde (10.7 g, 0.1 mol), 50 mL ethanol, 50 mL H2O, and 5 mL 36% concentrated hydrochloric acid was added to a 250 mL three-neck flask with magnetic agitator and reflex tube at 25°C. Thiosemicarbazide (10.9 g, 0.12 mol) in 10 mL ethanol was added slowly, and the solution immediately became yellow solid. After being stirred for 0.5 h and refluxed for 2 h, the solid was filtered and rinsed with ethanol to give the N-2-pyridine-methyl-thiosemicarbazide hydrochloride (20.2 g, yield 93.5%, Compound A) as a yellow acicular crystal [14].2-Acetyl pyridine (12.1 g, 0.1 mol) was added to a solution of ice acetic acid (85 mL) and hydrobromic acid (40%, 13 mL), and the mixture was stirred for 10 min under ice bath. After being completely cooled, bromide (0.1 mol, 5.2 mL) was added three times slowly. Then, the reaction mixture was stirred for 0.5 h at 0°C, 2 h at 40°C, and 2 h at 75°C, and the solution gradually changed from dark brown to light yellow with white crystal solid precipitation. After the reaction system was cooled to room temperature, 80 mL ethyl ether solution was added. Then the mixture was stirred continuously for 10 min, filtered, and washed with dry ethyl ether three times to give bromo-2-acetylpyridine hydrobromide (19.5 g, yield 90.3%,Compound B) as a white crystal [15].N-Pyridin-2-ylmethylene-N'-(4-pyridin-2-yl-thiazol-2-yl)-hydrazine (L1): N-2-pyridine methylene-thiosemicarbazide hydrochloride (10.8 g, 0.05 mol) and acetyl pyridine hydrobromide (10.8 g, 0.05 mol) were added to 160 mL 50% ethanol solution at 25°C. After being refluxed for 2 h, the mixture was cooled to room temperature and adjusted to neutral with 10% sodium hydroxide solution. The resultant solid was filtered, washed repeatedly with distilled water, and recrystallized with methanol to give N-pyridin-2-ylmethylene-N′-(4-pyridin-2-yl-thiazol-2-yl)-hydrazine (9.2 g, yield 65.7%) as a yellow crystalline solid. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3139.99(m), 3053.18(m), 2970.57(m), 2857.63(m), 2770.29(w), 1588.44(s), 1570.92(d), 1514.39(m), 1475.46(s), 1435.06(s), 1422.61(m), 1353.43(m), 1303.55(m), 1275.00(m), 1263.80(m), 1148.39(s) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.45 (s, 1H), 8.59 (dd, J = 3.6, 2.3 Hz, 2H), 8.08 (s, 1H), 7.93-7.81 (m, 4H), 7.59 (s, 1H), 7.41-7.25 (m, 2H). ESI-MS m/z(%): 281.8 (M++1). Anal. Calcd. For C14H11N5S: C, 59.77; H, 3.94; N, 24.89; S, 11.40. Found: C, 59.69; H, 3.98; N, 24.92; S, 11.36. UV-Vis (DMSO, λmax, nm): 255.0, 340.0.4-(Pyridin-3-yl)-2-(2-(pyridin-4-ylmethylene)hydrazinyl)thiazole (L2) was prepared in a similar way to ligand L1, with 3-pyridine formaldehyde, 3-acetyl pyridine instead of 2-pyridine formaldehyde, 2-acetyl pyridine. L2, yellow power, yield 12.2 g (86.5%). IR (KBr, cm−1): 3200.00(m), 3079.41(m), 2743.00(w), 1636.84(m), 1599.83(s), 1561.72(s), 1499.00(s), 1462.66(s), 1407.26(m), 1375.20(m), 1283.75(m), 1212.35(m), 1186.00(m), 1169.97(m), 1123.58(m) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 13.07 (s, 1H), 9.14 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 8.77 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 8.61 (dd, J = 5.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 8.38 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.13 (s, 1H), 7.97 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (s, 1H), 7.62 (dd, J = 8.0, 5.0 Hz, 1H). ESI-MS m/z(%): 281.8 (M++1). Anal. Calcd. For C14H11N5S: C, 59.77; H, 3.94; N, 24.89; S, 11.40. Found: C, 59.73; H, 3.97; N, 24.90; S, 11.36. UV-Vis (DMSO, λmax, nm): 255.0, 365.0.


### 2.3. Synthesis of Complexes 1-2

Complex 1. To a solution of 4-(pyridin-2-yl)-2-(2-(pyridin-2-ylmethylene)hydrazinyl)thiazole (L1) (28 mg, 0.1 mmol) in DMF (2 mL), Zn(TsO)2 (40.7 mg, 0.1 mmol) in DMF (2 mL) was added slowly dropwise. The solution was filtered, and yellowish crystal (42.2 mg) was obtained in a few days by the diffusion of diethyl ether in a wild-mouth bottle. The yield was 41.2%. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3216.90(m), 3071.80(m), 1605.36(s), 1592.50(s), 1574.47(d), 1494.73(m), 1470.91(s), 1445.51(m), 1432.01(m), 1376.73(m), 1311.65(m), 1284.21(m), 1155.66(s), 1107.48(s), 1029.73(m), 1005.69(s). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.41 (s, 1H), 8.60 (s, 2H), 8.13 (s, 2H), 7.90 (s, 4H), 7.48 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.39 (s, 2H), 7.11 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 2.29 (s, 3H). Anal. Calcd. For C42H36N10O6S4Zn: C, 51.98; H, 3.74; N, 14.43; S, 13.22. Found: C, 51.82; H, 3.72; N, 14.39; S, 13.18. UV-Vis (DMSO, λmax, nm): 255.0, 335.0.Complex 2. To a solution of 4-(pyridin-3-yl)-2-(2-(pyridin-4-ylmethylene)hydrazinyl)thiazole (L2) (28 mg, 0.1 mmol) in CH3OH (5 mL), ZnBr2 (22.5 mg, 0.1 mmol) in CH3OH (5 mL) was added. The precipitate was filtered, washed with CH3OH three times, and redissolved with DMF (5 mL). By the diffusion of diethyl ether, the yellowish crystal (20.8 mg) was obtained in a few days. The yield was 44.8%. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3245.21(m), 3096.59(m), 1593.25(s), 1567.21(s), 1500.00(m), 1449.70(s), 1410.93(m), 1370.81(s), 1306.35 (m), 1288.54(s), 1246.09(d), 1192.70(m), 1161.98(s), 626.84(s). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.96 (s, 1H), 9.12 (s, 1H), 8.73 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 8.58 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H), 8.32 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 8.10 (s, 1H), 7.89 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (s, 1H), 7.56 (dd, J = 8.3, 5.0 Hz, 1H). Anal. Calcd. For C20H26Br3N7O2SZn: C, 32.74; H, 3.57; N, 13.36; S, 4.37. Found: C, 32.79; H, 3.55; N, 13.27; S, 4.35. UV-Vis (DMSO, λmax, nm): 260.4, 370.0.


### 2.4. X-Ray Structure Determination

Crystals were selected appropriately and mounted on a glass fiber in a random orientation. A single crystal of ligandL1 was mounted on a Bruker Smart Apex-CCD diffractometer with CuKα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å) at 293 K, while the other crystals were carried out on an Agilent SuperNova diffractometer with CuKα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å) and with MoKα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) at 100K, respectively. The crystallographic data and structure refinement summary of ligands L1, L2 and complexes 1-2 are listed in Table 1. Using OLEX2 [16], the structure was solved by direct methods using the SHELXS program [17] and refined by full-matrix least-squares techniques SHELXL-2014 [18] on F2. All nonhydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. DIAMOND was used for molecular graphics [19].Table 1
Crystallographic data and structure refinement summary for ligand L2 and complexes 1-2.
L212Empirical formulaC14H11N5SC42H36N10O6S4ZnC20H26Br3N7O2SZnMw281.34970.44733.64Crystal systemMonoclinicMonoclinicMonoclinica (Å)8.5684(5)17.614(2)8.3543(5)b (Å)11.3512(6)20.6571(13)20.0129(13)c (Å)13.5596(8)17.620(2)16.2751(11)α (°)909090β (°)107.149(6)112.260(15)94.611(6)γ (°)909090V (Å3)1260.19(13)5933.2(12)2712.3(3)Space groupP21/nP21/cP21/nDensity (g·cm−3)1.4831.0461.797Z444μ (mm−1)2.2540.5975.433Temperature (K)100100100F(000)58418571448Crystal size (mm3)0.12 × 0.1 × 0.080.12 × 0.11 × 0.080.12 × 0.11 × 0.1Radiation(Cu-Kα) 1.54184(Mo-Kα) 0.71073(Mo-Kα) 0.71073Index ranges−10 ≤h ≤ 8, −13 ≤ k ≤ 9, −16 ≤ l ≤ 16−24 ≤h ≤ 22, −28 ≤ k ≤ 22, −23 ≤ l ≤ 24−10 ≤h ≤ 11, −25 ≤ k ≤ 26, −21 ≤ l ≤ 11θ range for data collection (°)5.1730–72.89602.2960–23.17302.7030–26.5730Goodness-of-fit onF21.0281.0251.047Reflections collected47563303414560Independent reflections2468 [Rint = 0.0399, Rsigma = 0.0544]14148 [Rint = 0.1101, Rsigma = 0.2110]6500 [Rint = 0.0455, Rsigma = 0.0794]FinalR indexes [I ≥ 2σ(I)] R1, ωR20.0430, 0.09850.1018, 0.24000.0571, 0.1240FinalR indexes [all data] R1, ωR20.0578, 0.10630.1860, 0.28720.0897, 0.1391Data/restraints/parameters2468/0/18114148/85/4986500/101/398Largest diff. peak/hole (e Å−3)0.685/−0.4901.691/−2.5710.86/−1.72


### 2.5. Antimicrobial Activity Studies

Qualitative analysis for screening of antibacterial activity was carried out by the microplate reader method [20–22]. Mueller–Hinton agar plates were seeded with indicator bacteria, Escherichia coli (E. coli, ATCC 25922), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus, CMCC(B) 26003), Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium, CMCC(B) 50071), Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis, ATCC 6633), Shigella flexneri (Sh. flexneri, CMCC(B) 51572), Vibrio parahaemolyticus (V. parahaemolyticus, ATCC 17802), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa, ATCC 9027), and cultured for 24 h at 37°C. Plates were inoculated with bacteria adjusted to 0.5 McFarland turbidity standards (108 cfu/mL). All compounds were dissolved in DMSO (100 μg/mL as an initial concentration) and tested against the ten pathogenic bacteria strains for their inhibitory activity. The antimicrobial activity of the compounds was expressed as the bacteriostatic rate (%) and determined by the absorbance of the bacterial samples using an enzyme-labeled instrument. Subsequently, compounds with high inhibitory rate (+++) were selected for minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination using double dilution method with concentrations ranging from 3.125 to 50 μg/mL. The MIC was recorded as the lowest concentration at which inhibitory rate was greater than 95%. As a blank group, only DMSO was added to the wells, and Ciprofloxacin was used as positive control for antibacterial activity. All tests and analyses were run in duplicate, and the results obtained were averaged. The percentage inhibition was calculated using the following equation:(1)inhibition%=Absblank−Abssample−AbscontrolAbsblank×100,where Absblank is the absorbance of DMSO + blank medium, Abscontrol is the absorbance of sample + blank medium, and Abssample is the absorbance of sample (test samples/standard) + bacterial suspension in medium.


### 2.6. Antitumor Activity Studies

The viability of the cell lines was tested using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay [23, 24]. The compounds were dissolved in DMSO and diluted with water to the required concentration (160 μg/mL, 80 μg/mL, 40 μg/mL, 20 μg/mL, 10 μg/mL, 5 μg/mL, 0 μg/mL). Human lung cancer cells (A549), human breast cancer cells (BT-20), human ovarian cell cells (MCF-7), and human osteosarcoma cells (U20S) cells were kindly provided by Stem Cell Bank, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and were plated in 96-multiwell plates (104 cells/well) for 24 hours before treatment with different concentrations of complexes to allow attachment of cell to the wall of the plates. Then, the cells were cultured using MEM, DMEM, F-12K, and DMEM/F-12(GIBCO) culture medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum in a 5% (volume fraction) CO2, 37°C saturated humidity incubator for 48 hours, respectively. Cells were fixed, washed, and stained with MTT. Cell growth inhibition was determined by measuring the absorbance of each well at 570 nm with a Tecan Infinite M1000 Pro Microplate Reader (Männedorf, Switzerland). GraphPad Prism version 7.0 program was used for data processing, and IC50 was obtained by fitting the nonlinear regression model with S-shaped dose response in the program.


## 2.1. Materials and Methods

All the starting materials and reagents in this work were obtained commercially and used without further purification. Elemental analyses were performed on a vario EL analyzer (Elementar, Germany) and IR spectra on an Avatar 330 FT-IR spectrometer (Thermo Nicolet) with potassium bromide pellets.1H NMR spectra were determined by Bruker AVANCE-III 500 at 300–400 MHz, and MestReNova software was used for data analysis. Chemical shifts (δ values) and coupling constants (J values) are reported as ppm and Hz, respectively. The following abbreviations are used: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; m, multiplet; br, broad. Antimicrobial tests were performed on a SpectraMax® ABS Absorbance Reader (Molecular Devices). Single-crystal X-ray diffraction was carried out by a Bruker Smart Apex-CCD and Agilent SuperNova diffractometer. The UV-Vis spectra were recorded on an Agilent Cary 60 spectrophotometer.


## 2.2. Synthesis of Ligands L1 and L2

A mixture of 2-pyridine formaldehyde (10.7 g, 0.1 mol), 50 mL ethanol, 50 mL H2O, and 5 mL 36% concentrated hydrochloric acid was added to a 250 mL three-neck flask with magnetic agitator and reflex tube at 25°C. Thiosemicarbazide (10.9 g, 0.12 mol) in 10 mL ethanol was added slowly, and the solution immediately became yellow solid. After being stirred for 0.5 h and refluxed for 2 h, the solid was filtered and rinsed with ethanol to give the N-2-pyridine-methyl-thiosemicarbazide hydrochloride (20.2 g, yield 93.5%, Compound A) as a yellow acicular crystal [14].2-Acetyl pyridine (12.1 g, 0.1 mol) was added to a solution of ice acetic acid (85 mL) and hydrobromic acid (40%, 13 mL), and the mixture was stirred for 10 min under ice bath. After being completely cooled, bromide (0.1 mol, 5.2 mL) was added three times slowly. Then, the reaction mixture was stirred for 0.5 h at 0°C, 2 h at 40°C, and 2 h at 75°C, and the solution gradually changed from dark brown to light yellow with white crystal solid precipitation. After the reaction system was cooled to room temperature, 80 mL ethyl ether solution was added. Then the mixture was stirred continuously for 10 min, filtered, and washed with dry ethyl ether three times to give bromo-2-acetylpyridine hydrobromide (19.5 g, yield 90.3%,Compound B) as a white crystal [15].N-Pyridin-2-ylmethylene-N'-(4-pyridin-2-yl-thiazol-2-yl)-hydrazine (L1): N-2-pyridine methylene-thiosemicarbazide hydrochloride (10.8 g, 0.05 mol) and acetyl pyridine hydrobromide (10.8 g, 0.05 mol) were added to 160 mL 50% ethanol solution at 25°C. After being refluxed for 2 h, the mixture was cooled to room temperature and adjusted to neutral with 10% sodium hydroxide solution. The resultant solid was filtered, washed repeatedly with distilled water, and recrystallized with methanol to give N-pyridin-2-ylmethylene-N′-(4-pyridin-2-yl-thiazol-2-yl)-hydrazine (9.2 g, yield 65.7%) as a yellow crystalline solid. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3139.99(m), 3053.18(m), 2970.57(m), 2857.63(m), 2770.29(w), 1588.44(s), 1570.92(d), 1514.39(m), 1475.46(s), 1435.06(s), 1422.61(m), 1353.43(m), 1303.55(m), 1275.00(m), 1263.80(m), 1148.39(s) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.45 (s, 1H), 8.59 (dd, J = 3.6, 2.3 Hz, 2H), 8.08 (s, 1H), 7.93-7.81 (m, 4H), 7.59 (s, 1H), 7.41-7.25 (m, 2H). ESI-MS m/z(%): 281.8 (M++1). Anal. Calcd. For C14H11N5S: C, 59.77; H, 3.94; N, 24.89; S, 11.40. Found: C, 59.69; H, 3.98; N, 24.92; S, 11.36. UV-Vis (DMSO, λmax, nm): 255.0, 340.0.4-(Pyridin-3-yl)-2-(2-(pyridin-4-ylmethylene)hydrazinyl)thiazole (L2) was prepared in a similar way to ligand L1, with 3-pyridine formaldehyde, 3-acetyl pyridine instead of 2-pyridine formaldehyde, 2-acetyl pyridine. L2, yellow power, yield 12.2 g (86.5%). IR (KBr, cm−1): 3200.00(m), 3079.41(m), 2743.00(w), 1636.84(m), 1599.83(s), 1561.72(s), 1499.00(s), 1462.66(s), 1407.26(m), 1375.20(m), 1283.75(m), 1212.35(m), 1186.00(m), 1169.97(m), 1123.58(m) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 13.07 (s, 1H), 9.14 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 8.77 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 8.61 (dd, J = 5.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 8.38 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.13 (s, 1H), 7.97 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (s, 1H), 7.62 (dd, J = 8.0, 5.0 Hz, 1H). ESI-MS m/z(%): 281.8 (M++1). Anal. Calcd. For C14H11N5S: C, 59.77; H, 3.94; N, 24.89; S, 11.40. Found: C, 59.73; H, 3.97; N, 24.90; S, 11.36. UV-Vis (DMSO, λmax, nm): 255.0, 365.0.


## 2.3. Synthesis of Complexes 1-2

Complex 1. To a solution of 4-(pyridin-2-yl)-2-(2-(pyridin-2-ylmethylene)hydrazinyl)thiazole (L1) (28 mg, 0.1 mmol) in DMF (2 mL), Zn(TsO)2 (40.7 mg, 0.1 mmol) in DMF (2 mL) was added slowly dropwise. The solution was filtered, and yellowish crystal (42.2 mg) was obtained in a few days by the diffusion of diethyl ether in a wild-mouth bottle. The yield was 41.2%. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3216.90(m), 3071.80(m), 1605.36(s), 1592.50(s), 1574.47(d), 1494.73(m), 1470.91(s), 1445.51(m), 1432.01(m), 1376.73(m), 1311.65(m), 1284.21(m), 1155.66(s), 1107.48(s), 1029.73(m), 1005.69(s). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.41 (s, 1H), 8.60 (s, 2H), 8.13 (s, 2H), 7.90 (s, 4H), 7.48 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.39 (s, 2H), 7.11 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 2.29 (s, 3H). Anal. Calcd. For C42H36N10O6S4Zn: C, 51.98; H, 3.74; N, 14.43; S, 13.22. Found: C, 51.82; H, 3.72; N, 14.39; S, 13.18. UV-Vis (DMSO, λmax, nm): 255.0, 335.0.Complex 2. To a solution of 4-(pyridin-3-yl)-2-(2-(pyridin-4-ylmethylene)hydrazinyl)thiazole (L2) (28 mg, 0.1 mmol) in CH3OH (5 mL), ZnBr2 (22.5 mg, 0.1 mmol) in CH3OH (5 mL) was added. The precipitate was filtered, washed with CH3OH three times, and redissolved with DMF (5 mL). By the diffusion of diethyl ether, the yellowish crystal (20.8 mg) was obtained in a few days. The yield was 44.8%. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3245.21(m), 3096.59(m), 1593.25(s), 1567.21(s), 1500.00(m), 1449.70(s), 1410.93(m), 1370.81(s), 1306.35 (m), 1288.54(s), 1246.09(d), 1192.70(m), 1161.98(s), 626.84(s). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.96 (s, 1H), 9.12 (s, 1H), 8.73 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 8.58 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H), 8.32 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 8.10 (s, 1H), 7.89 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (s, 1H), 7.56 (dd, J = 8.3, 5.0 Hz, 1H). Anal. Calcd. For C20H26Br3N7O2SZn: C, 32.74; H, 3.57; N, 13.36; S, 4.37. Found: C, 32.79; H, 3.55; N, 13.27; S, 4.35. UV-Vis (DMSO, λmax, nm): 260.4, 370.0.


## 2.4. X-Ray Structure Determination

Crystals were selected appropriately and mounted on a glass fiber in a random orientation. A single crystal of ligandL1 was mounted on a Bruker Smart Apex-CCD diffractometer with CuKα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å) at 293 K, while the other crystals were carried out on an Agilent SuperNova diffractometer with CuKα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å) and with MoKα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) at 100K, respectively. The crystallographic data and structure refinement summary of ligands L1, L2 and complexes 1-2 are listed in Table 1. Using OLEX2 [16], the structure was solved by direct methods using the SHELXS program [17] and refined by full-matrix least-squares techniques SHELXL-2014 [18] on F2. All nonhydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. DIAMOND was used for molecular graphics [19].Table 1
Crystallographic data and structure refinement summary for ligand L2 and complexes 1-2.
L212Empirical formulaC14H11N5SC42H36N10O6S4ZnC20H26Br3N7O2SZnMw281.34970.44733.64Crystal systemMonoclinicMonoclinicMonoclinica (Å)8.5684(5)17.614(2)8.3543(5)b (Å)11.3512(6)20.6571(13)20.0129(13)c (Å)13.5596(8)17.620(2)16.2751(11)α (°)909090β (°)107.149(6)112.260(15)94.611(6)γ (°)909090V (Å3)1260.19(13)5933.2(12)2712.3(3)Space groupP21/nP21/cP21/nDensity (g·cm−3)1.4831.0461.797Z444μ (mm−1)2.2540.5975.433Temperature (K)100100100F(000)58418571448Crystal size (mm3)0.12 × 0.1 × 0.080.12 × 0.11 × 0.080.12 × 0.11 × 0.1Radiation(Cu-Kα) 1.54184(Mo-Kα) 0.71073(Mo-Kα) 0.71073Index ranges−10 ≤h ≤ 8, −13 ≤ k ≤ 9, −16 ≤ l ≤ 16−24 ≤h ≤ 22, −28 ≤ k ≤ 22, −23 ≤ l ≤ 24−10 ≤h ≤ 11, −25 ≤ k ≤ 26, −21 ≤ l ≤ 11θ range for data collection (°)5.1730–72.89602.2960–23.17302.7030–26.5730Goodness-of-fit onF21.0281.0251.047Reflections collected47563303414560Independent reflections2468 [Rint = 0.0399, Rsigma = 0.0544]14148 [Rint = 0.1101, Rsigma = 0.2110]6500 [Rint = 0.0455, Rsigma = 0.0794]FinalR indexes [I ≥ 2σ(I)] R1, ωR20.0430, 0.09850.1018, 0.24000.0571, 0.1240FinalR indexes [all data] R1, ωR20.0578, 0.10630.1860, 0.28720.0897, 0.1391Data/restraints/parameters2468/0/18114148/85/4986500/101/398Largest diff. peak/hole (e Å−3)0.685/−0.4901.691/−2.5710.86/−1.72


## 2.5. Antimicrobial Activity Studies

Qualitative analysis for screening of antibacterial activity was carried out by the microplate reader method [20–22]. Mueller–Hinton agar plates were seeded with indicator bacteria, Escherichia coli (E. coli, ATCC 25922), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus, CMCC(B) 26003), Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium, CMCC(B) 50071), Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis, ATCC 6633), Shigella flexneri (Sh. flexneri, CMCC(B) 51572), Vibrio parahaemolyticus (V. parahaemolyticus, ATCC 17802), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa, ATCC 9027), and cultured for 24 h at 37°C. Plates were inoculated with bacteria adjusted to 0.5 McFarland turbidity standards (108 cfu/mL). All compounds were dissolved in DMSO (100 μg/mL as an initial concentration) and tested against the ten pathogenic bacteria strains for their inhibitory activity. The antimicrobial activity of the compounds was expressed as the bacteriostatic rate (%) and determined by the absorbance of the bacterial samples using an enzyme-labeled instrument. Subsequently, compounds with high inhibitory rate (+++) were selected for minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination using double dilution method with concentrations ranging from 3.125 to 50 μg/mL. The MIC was recorded as the lowest concentration at which inhibitory rate was greater than 95%. As a blank group, only DMSO was added to the wells, and Ciprofloxacin was used as positive control for antibacterial activity. All tests and analyses were run in duplicate, and the results obtained were averaged. The percentage inhibition was calculated using the following equation:(1)inhibition%=Absblank−Abssample−AbscontrolAbsblank×100,where Absblank is the absorbance of DMSO + blank medium, Abscontrol is the absorbance of sample + blank medium, and Abssample is the absorbance of sample (test samples/standard) + bacterial suspension in medium.


## 2.6. Antitumor Activity Studies

The viability of the cell lines was tested using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay [23, 24]. The compounds were dissolved in DMSO and diluted with water to the required concentration (160 μg/mL, 80 μg/mL, 40 μg/mL, 20 μg/mL, 10 μg/mL, 5 μg/mL, 0 μg/mL). Human lung cancer cells (A549), human breast cancer cells (BT-20), human ovarian cell cells (MCF-7), and human osteosarcoma cells (U20S) cells were kindly provided by Stem Cell Bank, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and were plated in 96-multiwell plates (104 cells/well) for 24 hours before treatment with different concentrations of complexes to allow attachment of cell to the wall of the plates. Then, the cells were cultured using MEM, DMEM, F-12K, and DMEM/F-12(GIBCO) culture medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum in a 5% (volume fraction) CO2, 37°C saturated humidity incubator for 48 hours, respectively. Cells were fixed, washed, and stained with MTT. Cell growth inhibition was determined by measuring the absorbance of each well at 570 nm with a Tecan Infinite M1000 Pro Microplate Reader (Männedorf, Switzerland). GraphPad Prism version 7.0 program was used for data processing, and IC50 was obtained by fitting the nonlinear regression model with S-shaped dose response in the program.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Solution Stability of Complexes 1-2

The essential prerequisite for the biological evaluation of metal complexes is their stability in solution. In the light of this fact,complexes 1-2 were dissolved in DMSO and DMSO-d6 (a solvent used for the preparation of stock solutions for biological evaluation), and their UV-Vis and NMR spectra, respectively, were recorded immediately after dissolution, as well as after 48 h of standing in the dark at ambient temperature. From NMR measurements (Figure S1), it can be concluded that the corresponding N-pyridine and N-thiazole remained coordinated to the Zn(II) ion during 48 h and that DMSO coordination did not occur. In the UV-Vis spectra (Figure S3), the shape of spectra and position of the absorption maxima (λmax = 255.0, 335.0 nm for complex 1; λmax = 260.4, 370.0 nm for complex 2) remained unmodified. Taken together, obtained spectroscopic data indicated the sufficient stability of complexes 1-2 in DMSO solution.


### 3.2. FTIR Spectral Elucidation

The infrared absorption peaks of the main functional groups on ligandsL1 and L2 and complexes 1–3 are listed in Table 2. Additionally, as shown in Figure S2, the peak at 2970.57 cm−1 was the stretching vibration peak of the C-H bond in the N=C-H group, and the peaks at 2857.63 and 2770.29 cm−1 belonged to the stretching vibration peak of the C-H bond on the thiazole ring, while that at 1263.80 cm−1 was the stretching vibration peak of the Schiff base C=N bond. The peaks at 1148.39 cm−1 were attributed to the stretching vibration of the C-N bond. In compound L2, the peak at 2743.00 cm−1 belonged to the stretching vibration peak of the C-H bond on the thiazole ring, whereas that at 1283.75 cm−1 was the stretching vibration peak of the Schiff base C=N bond. The peaks at 1186.00, 1123.58, and 1169.97 cm−1 were attributed to the stretching vibration of the C-N bond. In complex 1, the peaks at 1605.36, 1574.47, 1445.51, and 1494.73 cm−1 were caused by the skeleton vibration of the benzene ring. The peak at 1155.66–1005.69 cm−1 belonged to the antisymmetric stretching vibration and symmetric stretching vibration of the SO3 group in p-toluene sulfonate. In complex 2, the stretching vibration peaks of the C-N bond were 1192.70 and 1161.98 cm−1, whereas 626.84 cm−1 might belong to the characteristic absorption peak of Zn-Br.Table 2
Infrared absorption peaks of the main functional groups on ligandsL1 and L2 and complexes 1–3.
L1L212Stretching vibration peak (N-H)3139.99 cm−13200.00 cm−13216.90 cm−13245.21 cm−1Skeleton vibration peak (pyridine)1353.43, 1588.44, 1514.39, 1475.46 cm−11462.66, 1499.00, 1599.83, 1636.84 cm−11592.50, 1376.73 cm−11567.21, 1593.25, 1500.00, 1449.70 cm−1Skeleton vibration peak (Thiazole)1570.92, 1435.06, 1422.61 cm−11561.72, 1407.26, 1375.20 cm−11470.91, 1432.01, 1311.65 cm−11410.93, 1370.81, 1306.35 cm−1Stretching vibration peak (C-H on pyridine)3053.18 cm−13079.41 cm−13071.80 cm−13096.59 cm−1Stretching vibration peak (C=N on ring)1303.55, 1275.00 cm−11212.35 cm−11284.21 cm−11288.54, 1246.09 cm−1In-plane oscillations peak (C-H on pyridine and thiazole ring)1100–400 cm−11100–400 cm−11000–400 cm−11100–600 cm−1


### 3.3. X-Ray Crystal Structure

Suitable single crystals of ligandL2 and complexes 1-2 for X-ray diffraction studies were obtained by the diffusion of diethyl ether into a DMF solution at room temperature. Ligand L2 was crystallized in a monoclinic system, and the spatial group was P21/n. The selected bond lengths and bond angles of L2 are listed in Table 3. The N(3)–N(2) bond (1.360(2)Å) has the same length as the N(3)–C(7) bond. The molecular structure of L2 and its packing diagram are depicted in Figure 1. In the crystal of L2, the molecule is in the E-conformation, and the supramolecular arrangement is directed mainly by strong N(3)–H(3)···N(5) hydrogen bonds between two molecules (Table 4). The torsion angles of C(13)-C(9)-C(8)-N(4) (172.59°) and C(10)-C(9)-C(8)-C(14) (174.37°) indicate that the thiazole ring is almost coplanar with the neighboring pyridine ring.Table 3
Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (°) of L2.
BondDist.S(1)–C(7)1.743(2)S(1)–C(14)1.724(2)N(4)–C(8)1.390(3)N(3)–C(7)1.360(3)N(5)–C(10)1.345(3)N(5)–C(11)1.336(3)N(4)–C(7)1.303(3)N(2)–C(6)1.279(3)N(3)–N(2)1.360(2)Angle(°)C(14)–S(1)–C(7)88.1(1)C(7)–N(4)–C(8)109.65(18)N(2)–N(3)–H(3)121.300C(13)-C(9)-C(8)-N(4)172.59N(3)–C(7)–S(1)120.47(15)N(2)–C(6)–C(5)120.4(2)N(2)–C(6)–H(6)119.800(10)-C(9)-C(8)-C(14)174.37N(2)–N3—C7117.43(18)C(7)–N(3)–H(3)121.300C(6)–N(2)–N(3)116.83(18)Figure 1
(a) The structure of ligand L2. (b) Molecular accumulation figure viewed along a-axis in L2 (green lines represent the H-bonds).
(a)(b)Table 4
Hydrogen bonds for the L2 (Å and °).
D–H···AD–HH···AD···AD–H···AN(3)–H(3)···N(5)0.88002.04402.864159.04Complex1 crystallized in a monoclinic unit cell, P21/c space group. The selected bond lengths and bond angles of complex 1 are listed in Table 5. As shown in Figure 2, the Zn(II) atom occupies the center of inversion with a coordination model of ML2, and it is coordinated by four nitrogen atoms from two ligands, two oxygen atoms from two p-toluene sulfonic acid ions. The distances of Zn(1)–O(1) and Zn(1)–O(4) are 2.153(4) and 2.117(5), respectively. The distances of Zn(1)–N(1), Zn(1)–N(2), Zn(1)–N(6), and Zn(1)–N(7) are 2.140(6), 2.089(6), 2.175(5), and 2.085(5)Å, respectively. The S1 atom in thiazole ring was not coordinated with the metal ion. The N(2)–Zn(1)–O(4), N(2)–Zn(1)–N(6), and N(7)–Zn(1)–O(1) bond angles are all nearly 90°, indicating that the complexes have nearly perfect hexahedron geometry as expected. The bond distances and angle values of 2 are in good agreement with the related Zn(II) complexes.Table 5
Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (°) of complex 1.
BondDist.Zn(1)–N(2)2.089(6)Zn(1)–O(4)2.117(5)Zn(1)–N(6)2.175(5)Zn(1)–O(1)2.153(4)Zn(1)–N(7)2.085(5)Zn(1)–N(1)2.140(6)S(1)–O(1)1.487(4)S(2)–O(4)1.487(5)N(9)–N(8)1.368(7)Angle(°)N(2)–Zn(1)–O(4)90.2(2)N(2)–Zn(1)–N(6)97.4(2)N(2)–Zn(1)–O(1)94.40(19)N(7)–Zn(1)–O(4)95.46(19)N(7)–Zn(1)–N(6)78.01(18)N(2)–Zn(1)–N(1)78.0(2)O(4)–Zn(1)–N(6)91.01(18)O(4)–Zn(1)–O(1)87.19(16)N(7)–Zn(1)–O(1)90.43(17)N(7)–Zn(1)–N(1)96.8(2)O(4)–Zn(1)–N(1)166.75(18)O(1)–Zn(1)–N(6)168.09(16)N(7)–Zn(1)–N(2)172.8(2)N(1)–Zn(1)–N(6)96.3(2)N(1)–Zn(1)–O(1)87.8(2)Figure 2
(a) View of the coordination environment of Zn(II) ions in 1. (b) Molecular accumulation figure viewed along b-axis in 1.
(a)(b)The selected bond lengths and angles for complex2 are summarized in Table 6. A deformed tetrahedron geometry around the central atom is confirmed by the Br(1)–Zn(1)–Br(2), Br(3)–Zn(1)–Br(2), Br(1)–Zn(1)–Br(3), and N(1)–Zn(1)–Br(1) bite angles, which differ a little as expected for atoms coordinated in cis-positions, and also by the Zn(1)–N1 bond (2.073(4)), which is slightly shorter than the Zn(1)–Br bonds (2.3834(8), 2.3878(9), 2.3715(9)Å, respectively) due to the smaller covalent radius of nitrogen. Nevertheless, the bond distances around the Zn(II) atom are similar to those observed in similar Zn(II) complexes as reported in the Crystallography Open Database [25]. Two disordered DMF molecules were not involved in the coordinate system with 35% and 45% occupancy factors, respectively (Figure 3, Table 7). Additionally, intramolecular hydrogen bonds N(3)–H(3)···O(1) and N(3)–H(3)···O(1A) were observed between ligand L2 and one disordered DMF molecule with the distance of 2.793(16) and 2.740(3)Å in the crystal structure.Table 6
Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (°) of complex 2.
BondDist.Zn(1)–Br(1)2.3834(8)Zn(1)–Br(3)2.3715(9)Zn(1)–Br(2)2.3878(9)Zn(1)–N(1)2.073(4)S(1)–C(7)1.726(5)S(1)–C(8)1.740(6)Angle(°)Br(1)–Zn(1)–Br(2)112.75(3)Br(3)–Zn(1)–Br(1)110.68(3)Br(3)–Zn(1)–Br(2)112.54(3)N1–Zn(1)–Br(1)109.01(12)N1–Zn(1)–Br(3)105.75(12)N1–Zn(1)–Br(2)105.70(12)Figure 3
The structure of 2 (green lines represent the H-bonds).Table 7
Hydrogen bonds for the complex 2 (Å and °).
D–H···AD–HH···AD···AD–H···AN(3)–H(3)···O(1)0.88001.98002.793(16)153.500N(3)–H(3)···O(1A)0.88001.90002.740(3)160.400


### 3.4. Biological Activity

The antibacterial activity of the ligands and complexes was presented as inhibition rate, and those with high inhibitory rate (+++) were selected for minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination. As shown in Table8, the complexes had a wider broad spectrum and stronger antibacterial property than the ligands, and such enhanced activity of metal chelates is due to faster diffusion of metal complexes as a whole through the cell membrane or due to combined activity effect of the metal and the ligand. To further measure the MIC, CIPRO was used as the positive control. Compared with the CIPRO, complex 2 had a better or the same inhibitory effect on E. coli, Sh. flexneri, and P. aeruginosa with the MIC of 3.13 μg·mL−1, 3.13 μg·mL−1, and 6.25 μg·mL−1, respectively, while complex 1 held a stronger inhibitory effect on S. typhimurium and B. subtilis with the MIC of 6.25 μg·mL−1 and 3.13 μg·mL−1, respectively (Table 9). These results indicated that the complexes possess antibacterial activity inhibiting multiplication process of the microbes by blocking their active sites [26, 27].Table 8
Bactericidal activity screening test levels of the ligands and complexes (100μg/mL)a.
CompoundsInhibition ratio (%) (Levelsc)E. colibS. aureusbS. typhimuriumbB. subtilisbSh. flexneribV. parahaemolyticusbP. aeruginosabL184.981.577.273.996.374.897.1(++)(++)(++)(++)(+++)(++)(+++)L2101.755.477.099.198.714.379.2(+)(−)(+)(+++)(+++)(−)(+)173.997.399.7102.099.298.743.8(++)(+++)(+++)(+++)(+++)(+++)(−)2102.3102.296.354.6100.040.4101.3(+++)(+++)(+++)(+++)(+++)(−)(+++)aBactericidal activity is revealed by the percentage of complexes against bacterial strain. bEscherichia coli (E. coli, ATCC 25922), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus, CMCC(B) 26003), Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium, CMCC(B) 50071), Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis, ATCC 6633), Shigella flexneri (Sh. flexneri, CMCC(B) 51572), Vibrio parahaemolyticus (V. parahaemolyticus, ATCC 17802), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa, ATCC 9027). cActivity levels; +++ ≥ 90%; ++ ≥ 70–89%; + ≥ 50–69%; − < 50%.Table 9
Tests of MIC (μg/mL) of the ligands and complexes against bacterial strainsa.
CompoundsMIC (μg·mL−1)E. coliS. aureusS. typhimuriumB. subtilisSh. flexneriV. parahaemolyticusP. aeruginosaCIPROb12.56.2512.56.253.133.136.25L1————50.0—100.0L212.5——50100——1—12.56.253.1312.512.5—23.1312.512.5—3.13—6.25aResults are expressed as the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). bCiprofloxacin (CIPRO).Thein vitro antitumor activity of the compounds against human lung cancer cells (A549), human breast cancer cells (BT-20), human ovarian cancer cells (MCF-7), and human osteosarcoma cells (U20S) was measured via MTT assay. In general, the complexes showed a stronger antitumor activity than the corresponding ligands (Table 10). Between the two complexes, complex 2 exerted a more effective antitumor activity with the lower IC50 value. Among the four cancer cell lines, complex 2 had the most significant effect on A549 with the IC50 value of 4.48 μg/mL. The result indicated the enhancement of the antitumor activity upon coordination. The enhancement of antitumor activity may be attributed to the fact that the positive charge of the metal increased the acidity of coordinated ligand that bears protons, leading to stronger hydrogen bonds which enhanced the biological activity [28]. Despite the conformed antitumor activity, a detailed molecular mechanism against cancer cell lines of the ligands and the complexes remains to be further elucidated.Table 10
Tests of IC50 (μg/mL) of the ligands and complexes against cancer cellsa.
CompoundsIC50 ± SD (μg·mL−1)A549bBT-20bMCF-7bU20SbL130.16 ± 3.4545.30 ± 4.8426.50 ± 4.4952.00 ± 4.37L236.72 ± 2.3623.25 ± 1.6321.33 ± 3.8138.22 ± 4.1217.43 ± 1.5512.23 ± 2.1117.35 ± 3.239.78 ± 1.2424.48 ± 0.688.23 ± 1.026.38 ± 0.299.52 ± 0.93aResults are expressed as the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50). bHuman lung cancer cells (A549), human breast cancer cells (BT-20), human ovarian cancer cells (MCF-7), human osteosarcoma cells (U20S).


## 3.1. Solution Stability of Complexes 1-2

The essential prerequisite for the biological evaluation of metal complexes is their stability in solution. In the light of this fact,complexes 1-2 were dissolved in DMSO and DMSO-d6 (a solvent used for the preparation of stock solutions for biological evaluation), and their UV-Vis and NMR spectra, respectively, were recorded immediately after dissolution, as well as after 48 h of standing in the dark at ambient temperature. From NMR measurements (Figure S1), it can be concluded that the corresponding N-pyridine and N-thiazole remained coordinated to the Zn(II) ion during 48 h and that DMSO coordination did not occur. In the UV-Vis spectra (Figure S3), the shape of spectra and position of the absorption maxima (λmax = 255.0, 335.0 nm for complex 1; λmax = 260.4, 370.0 nm for complex 2) remained unmodified. Taken together, obtained spectroscopic data indicated the sufficient stability of complexes 1-2 in DMSO solution.


## 3.2. FTIR Spectral Elucidation

The infrared absorption peaks of the main functional groups on ligandsL1 and L2 and complexes 1–3 are listed in Table 2. Additionally, as shown in Figure S2, the peak at 2970.57 cm−1 was the stretching vibration peak of the C-H bond in the N=C-H group, and the peaks at 2857.63 and 2770.29 cm−1 belonged to the stretching vibration peak of the C-H bond on the thiazole ring, while that at 1263.80 cm−1 was the stretching vibration peak of the Schiff base C=N bond. The peaks at 1148.39 cm−1 were attributed to the stretching vibration of the C-N bond. In compound L2, the peak at 2743.00 cm−1 belonged to the stretching vibration peak of the C-H bond on the thiazole ring, whereas that at 1283.75 cm−1 was the stretching vibration peak of the Schiff base C=N bond. The peaks at 1186.00, 1123.58, and 1169.97 cm−1 were attributed to the stretching vibration of the C-N bond. In complex 1, the peaks at 1605.36, 1574.47, 1445.51, and 1494.73 cm−1 were caused by the skeleton vibration of the benzene ring. The peak at 1155.66–1005.69 cm−1 belonged to the antisymmetric stretching vibration and symmetric stretching vibration of the SO3 group in p-toluene sulfonate. In complex 2, the stretching vibration peaks of the C-N bond were 1192.70 and 1161.98 cm−1, whereas 626.84 cm−1 might belong to the characteristic absorption peak of Zn-Br.Table 2
Infrared absorption peaks of the main functional groups on ligandsL1 and L2 and complexes 1–3.
L1L212Stretching vibration peak (N-H)3139.99 cm−13200.00 cm−13216.90 cm−13245.21 cm−1Skeleton vibration peak (pyridine)1353.43, 1588.44, 1514.39, 1475.46 cm−11462.66, 1499.00, 1599.83, 1636.84 cm−11592.50, 1376.73 cm−11567.21, 1593.25, 1500.00, 1449.70 cm−1Skeleton vibration peak (Thiazole)1570.92, 1435.06, 1422.61 cm−11561.72, 1407.26, 1375.20 cm−11470.91, 1432.01, 1311.65 cm−11410.93, 1370.81, 1306.35 cm−1Stretching vibration peak (C-H on pyridine)3053.18 cm−13079.41 cm−13071.80 cm−13096.59 cm−1Stretching vibration peak (C=N on ring)1303.55, 1275.00 cm−11212.35 cm−11284.21 cm−11288.54, 1246.09 cm−1In-plane oscillations peak (C-H on pyridine and thiazole ring)1100–400 cm−11100–400 cm−11000–400 cm−11100–600 cm−1


## 3.3. X-Ray Crystal Structure

Suitable single crystals of ligandL2 and complexes 1-2 for X-ray diffraction studies were obtained by the diffusion of diethyl ether into a DMF solution at room temperature. Ligand L2 was crystallized in a monoclinic system, and the spatial group was P21/n. The selected bond lengths and bond angles of L2 are listed in Table 3. The N(3)–N(2) bond (1.360(2)Å) has the same length as the N(3)–C(7) bond. The molecular structure of L2 and its packing diagram are depicted in Figure 1. In the crystal of L2, the molecule is in the E-conformation, and the supramolecular arrangement is directed mainly by strong N(3)–H(3)···N(5) hydrogen bonds between two molecules (Table 4). The torsion angles of C(13)-C(9)-C(8)-N(4) (172.59°) and C(10)-C(9)-C(8)-C(14) (174.37°) indicate that the thiazole ring is almost coplanar with the neighboring pyridine ring.Table 3
Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (°) of L2.
BondDist.S(1)–C(7)1.743(2)S(1)–C(14)1.724(2)N(4)–C(8)1.390(3)N(3)–C(7)1.360(3)N(5)–C(10)1.345(3)N(5)–C(11)1.336(3)N(4)–C(7)1.303(3)N(2)–C(6)1.279(3)N(3)–N(2)1.360(2)Angle(°)C(14)–S(1)–C(7)88.1(1)C(7)–N(4)–C(8)109.65(18)N(2)–N(3)–H(3)121.300C(13)-C(9)-C(8)-N(4)172.59N(3)–C(7)–S(1)120.47(15)N(2)–C(6)–C(5)120.4(2)N(2)–C(6)–H(6)119.800(10)-C(9)-C(8)-C(14)174.37N(2)–N3—C7117.43(18)C(7)–N(3)–H(3)121.300C(6)–N(2)–N(3)116.83(18)Figure 1
(a) The structure of ligand L2. (b) Molecular accumulation figure viewed along a-axis in L2 (green lines represent the H-bonds).
(a)(b)Table 4
Hydrogen bonds for the L2 (Å and °).
D–H···AD–HH···AD···AD–H···AN(3)–H(3)···N(5)0.88002.04402.864159.04Complex1 crystallized in a monoclinic unit cell, P21/c space group. The selected bond lengths and bond angles of complex 1 are listed in Table 5. As shown in Figure 2, the Zn(II) atom occupies the center of inversion with a coordination model of ML2, and it is coordinated by four nitrogen atoms from two ligands, two oxygen atoms from two p-toluene sulfonic acid ions. The distances of Zn(1)–O(1) and Zn(1)–O(4) are 2.153(4) and 2.117(5), respectively. The distances of Zn(1)–N(1), Zn(1)–N(2), Zn(1)–N(6), and Zn(1)–N(7) are 2.140(6), 2.089(6), 2.175(5), and 2.085(5)Å, respectively. The S1 atom in thiazole ring was not coordinated with the metal ion. The N(2)–Zn(1)–O(4), N(2)–Zn(1)–N(6), and N(7)–Zn(1)–O(1) bond angles are all nearly 90°, indicating that the complexes have nearly perfect hexahedron geometry as expected. The bond distances and angle values of 2 are in good agreement with the related Zn(II) complexes.Table 5
Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (°) of complex 1.
BondDist.Zn(1)–N(2)2.089(6)Zn(1)–O(4)2.117(5)Zn(1)–N(6)2.175(5)Zn(1)–O(1)2.153(4)Zn(1)–N(7)2.085(5)Zn(1)–N(1)2.140(6)S(1)–O(1)1.487(4)S(2)–O(4)1.487(5)N(9)–N(8)1.368(7)Angle(°)N(2)–Zn(1)–O(4)90.2(2)N(2)–Zn(1)–N(6)97.4(2)N(2)–Zn(1)–O(1)94.40(19)N(7)–Zn(1)–O(4)95.46(19)N(7)–Zn(1)–N(6)78.01(18)N(2)–Zn(1)–N(1)78.0(2)O(4)–Zn(1)–N(6)91.01(18)O(4)–Zn(1)–O(1)87.19(16)N(7)–Zn(1)–O(1)90.43(17)N(7)–Zn(1)–N(1)96.8(2)O(4)–Zn(1)–N(1)166.75(18)O(1)–Zn(1)–N(6)168.09(16)N(7)–Zn(1)–N(2)172.8(2)N(1)–Zn(1)–N(6)96.3(2)N(1)–Zn(1)–O(1)87.8(2)Figure 2
(a) View of the coordination environment of Zn(II) ions in 1. (b) Molecular accumulation figure viewed along b-axis in 1.
(a)(b)The selected bond lengths and angles for complex2 are summarized in Table 6. A deformed tetrahedron geometry around the central atom is confirmed by the Br(1)–Zn(1)–Br(2), Br(3)–Zn(1)–Br(2), Br(1)–Zn(1)–Br(3), and N(1)–Zn(1)–Br(1) bite angles, which differ a little as expected for atoms coordinated in cis-positions, and also by the Zn(1)–N1 bond (2.073(4)), which is slightly shorter than the Zn(1)–Br bonds (2.3834(8), 2.3878(9), 2.3715(9)Å, respectively) due to the smaller covalent radius of nitrogen. Nevertheless, the bond distances around the Zn(II) atom are similar to those observed in similar Zn(II) complexes as reported in the Crystallography Open Database [25]. Two disordered DMF molecules were not involved in the coordinate system with 35% and 45% occupancy factors, respectively (Figure 3, Table 7). Additionally, intramolecular hydrogen bonds N(3)–H(3)···O(1) and N(3)–H(3)···O(1A) were observed between ligand L2 and one disordered DMF molecule with the distance of 2.793(16) and 2.740(3)Å in the crystal structure.Table 6
Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (°) of complex 2.
BondDist.Zn(1)–Br(1)2.3834(8)Zn(1)–Br(3)2.3715(9)Zn(1)–Br(2)2.3878(9)Zn(1)–N(1)2.073(4)S(1)–C(7)1.726(5)S(1)–C(8)1.740(6)Angle(°)Br(1)–Zn(1)–Br(2)112.75(3)Br(3)–Zn(1)–Br(1)110.68(3)Br(3)–Zn(1)–Br(2)112.54(3)N1–Zn(1)–Br(1)109.01(12)N1–Zn(1)–Br(3)105.75(12)N1–Zn(1)–Br(2)105.70(12)Figure 3
The structure of 2 (green lines represent the H-bonds).Table 7
Hydrogen bonds for the complex 2 (Å and °).
D–H···AD–HH···AD···AD–H···AN(3)–H(3)···O(1)0.88001.98002.793(16)153.500N(3)–H(3)···O(1A)0.88001.90002.740(3)160.400


## 3.4. Biological Activity

The antibacterial activity of the ligands and complexes was presented as inhibition rate, and those with high inhibitory rate (+++) were selected for minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination. As shown in Table8, the complexes had a wider broad spectrum and stronger antibacterial property than the ligands, and such enhanced activity of metal chelates is due to faster diffusion of metal complexes as a whole through the cell membrane or due to combined activity effect of the metal and the ligand. To further measure the MIC, CIPRO was used as the positive control. Compared with the CIPRO, complex 2 had a better or the same inhibitory effect on E. coli, Sh. flexneri, and P. aeruginosa with the MIC of 3.13 μg·mL−1, 3.13 μg·mL−1, and 6.25 μg·mL−1, respectively, while complex 1 held a stronger inhibitory effect on S. typhimurium and B. subtilis with the MIC of 6.25 μg·mL−1 and 3.13 μg·mL−1, respectively (Table 9). These results indicated that the complexes possess antibacterial activity inhibiting multiplication process of the microbes by blocking their active sites [26, 27].Table 8
Bactericidal activity screening test levels of the ligands and complexes (100μg/mL)a.
CompoundsInhibition ratio (%) (Levelsc)E. colibS. aureusbS. typhimuriumbB. subtilisbSh. flexneribV. parahaemolyticusbP. aeruginosabL184.981.577.273.996.374.897.1(++)(++)(++)(++)(+++)(++)(+++)L2101.755.477.099.198.714.379.2(+)(−)(+)(+++)(+++)(−)(+)173.997.399.7102.099.298.743.8(++)(+++)(+++)(+++)(+++)(+++)(−)2102.3102.296.354.6100.040.4101.3(+++)(+++)(+++)(+++)(+++)(−)(+++)aBactericidal activity is revealed by the percentage of complexes against bacterial strain. bEscherichia coli (E. coli, ATCC 25922), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus, CMCC(B) 26003), Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium, CMCC(B) 50071), Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis, ATCC 6633), Shigella flexneri (Sh. flexneri, CMCC(B) 51572), Vibrio parahaemolyticus (V. parahaemolyticus, ATCC 17802), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa, ATCC 9027). cActivity levels; +++ ≥ 90%; ++ ≥ 70–89%; + ≥ 50–69%; − < 50%.Table 9
Tests of MIC (μg/mL) of the ligands and complexes against bacterial strainsa.
CompoundsMIC (μg·mL−1)E. coliS. aureusS. typhimuriumB. subtilisSh. flexneriV. parahaemolyticusP. aeruginosaCIPROb12.56.2512.56.253.133.136.25L1————50.0—100.0L212.5——50100——1—12.56.253.1312.512.5—23.1312.512.5—3.13—6.25aResults are expressed as the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). bCiprofloxacin (CIPRO).Thein vitro antitumor activity of the compounds against human lung cancer cells (A549), human breast cancer cells (BT-20), human ovarian cancer cells (MCF-7), and human osteosarcoma cells (U20S) was measured via MTT assay. In general, the complexes showed a stronger antitumor activity than the corresponding ligands (Table 10). Between the two complexes, complex 2 exerted a more effective antitumor activity with the lower IC50 value. Among the four cancer cell lines, complex 2 had the most significant effect on A549 with the IC50 value of 4.48 μg/mL. The result indicated the enhancement of the antitumor activity upon coordination. The enhancement of antitumor activity may be attributed to the fact that the positive charge of the metal increased the acidity of coordinated ligand that bears protons, leading to stronger hydrogen bonds which enhanced the biological activity [28]. Despite the conformed antitumor activity, a detailed molecular mechanism against cancer cell lines of the ligands and the complexes remains to be further elucidated.Table 10
Tests of IC50 (μg/mL) of the ligands and complexes against cancer cellsa.
CompoundsIC50 ± SD (μg·mL−1)A549bBT-20bMCF-7bU20SbL130.16 ± 3.4545.30 ± 4.8426.50 ± 4.4952.00 ± 4.37L236.72 ± 2.3623.25 ± 1.6321.33 ± 3.8138.22 ± 4.1217.43 ± 1.5512.23 ± 2.1117.35 ± 3.239.78 ± 1.2424.48 ± 0.688.23 ± 1.026.38 ± 0.299.52 ± 0.93aResults are expressed as the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50). bHuman lung cancer cells (A549), human breast cancer cells (BT-20), human ovarian cancer cells (MCF-7), human osteosarcoma cells (U20S).


## 4. Conclusion

In this paper, We have reported the preparation, characterization, and biological activities of new thiazole-hydrazone derivatives based on pyridine and their two Zn(II) complexes. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis indicated that both ligandL2 and complexes 1-2 had mononuclear molecular structure. The in vitro antimicrobial activity of the complexes was screened using the microplate reader method, and in vitro antitumor activities of the complexes were evaluated by MTT. The results showed that the complexes coordinated with Zn2+ had a better antimicrobial activity and antitumor activity than the corresponding ligands due to the lipophilic nature of the metal ions in complexes, which might provide valuable information for further designing and synthesizing new antimicrobial and antitumor agents.



---

*Source: 8852470-2020-09-15.xml*