# Effect of Car Rear Shape on Pollution Dispersion in Near Wake Region

Authors: Xing-Jun Hu; Han-Bo Yang; Bo Yang; Xiu-Cheng Li; Yu-Long Lei
Journal: Mathematical Problems in Engineering
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

Dispersion of vehicle exhaust gas is a primary source of air pollution in urban areas. Thus, it has become an important subject in the automotive field. This paper consists of two parts. First, the fastback MIRA model was selected as study object and a standardκ-ε two-equation turbulence model was used. The simulation results were compared and analyzed with experimental data. The feasibility of the turbulence model and grid strategy was then verified, and the results were used in the next research step. Second, we used propane as tracer gas while ignoring the effect of the vehicle wake field force on this gas. The tracer gas diffusion in the wake flow field was then simulated through fastback, notchback, and square-back MIRA models. This study focuses on analyzing the characteristics of wake field diffusion effects, particularly in the near wake of a vehicle.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The term “PM2.5” refers to micron particles that have an aerodynamic diameter of less than or equal to 2.5 μm in the atmosphere. These particles mainly originate from residues produced in the process of daily power generation, industrial production, and vehicle emissions. Thus, these particles contain toxic components such as heavy metals [1].Dispersion of vehicle exhaust gas is a major cause of air pollution in urban areas. Studying the dispersion behavior of vehicle exhaust gas is significant to improve living quality and inhabitation environment, as well as to achieve sustainable development [2].In this research field, CFD technology has many advantages, such as low cost of money and time, ease in changing boundary conditions, and high repeatability. Foreign scholars have studied diffusion characteristics using the CFD technique, such as simple exhaust diffusion model [3], dispersion of vehicle pollutants under idle condition [4, 5], different driving conditions [6], vehicle queues [7], and effect of body-tail modeling on the diffusion properties [8].Nucleation, condensation, coagulation, deposition, and other phenomena [9–11] during the pollution diffusion process are ignored. Tracer gas is used in CFD simulation analysis [8, 12] to qualitatively examine the exhaust diffusion in the wake flow field of different models. This gas was selected as the tracer gas [12] because of the stable physical nature of propane (C3H8) and its low-volume fraction in the environment.


## 2. Simulation Models

We used 33% scale MIRA models, including fastback, notchback, and square-back models, in the present study. We slightly modified the size of the fastback model to compare the numerical simulation results with existing experimental data [6], as shown in Figure 1. The vehicle model and application of the coordinate system based on the size of the reference model are shown in Figure 2, where L is the model length, h is the model height, and b is half the width of the model base.Figure 1
33% scale MIRA reference model (unit: mm).Figure 2
Vehicle model and coordinate system.


## 3. Numerical Simulation

### 3.1. Calculation Domain

Previous simulations show that the calculation domain was a large cuboid, the distance from the left and right sides to the field symmetry was 3.5 times the vehicle width, the computational field height was 5 times the height of the vehicle, and the length was 11 times the length of the vehicle 3 times the length of the front part of the vehicle.


### 3.2. Mesh Strategy

A combination of tetrahedrons and triangular prisms were used in this study. The prisms were divided into three layers to effectively simulate the boundary layer flow. The grid around the body was refined to accurately capture the flow field near the body. The final grid is shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Mesh distribution.


### 3.3. Turbulence Model

The standardκ-ε two-equation turbulence model was adopted, and the finite volume method was used to discretize the governing equations. Simulation analysis was conducted based on mass conservation, momentum conservation, turbulent kinetic energy, diffusive species equations, turbulent dissipation rate equations, and energy equation [13].The diffusion conservation equation is expressed as follows:(1)∂ρC∂t+∂ρCuj∂xj=∂∂xjρDm∂C∂xj+ρd˙.In (1), ρ is the density of a fluid or a solid, xj stands for the coordinates, uj is the velocity of flow in xj direction, d˙ is the source term of diffusive species, C is the concentration of a diffusive species, and Dm is the diffusion coefficient.


## 3.1. Calculation Domain

Previous simulations show that the calculation domain was a large cuboid, the distance from the left and right sides to the field symmetry was 3.5 times the vehicle width, the computational field height was 5 times the height of the vehicle, and the length was 11 times the length of the vehicle 3 times the length of the front part of the vehicle.


## 3.2. Mesh Strategy

A combination of tetrahedrons and triangular prisms were used in this study. The prisms were divided into three layers to effectively simulate the boundary layer flow. The grid around the body was refined to accurately capture the flow field near the body. The final grid is shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Mesh distribution.


## 3.3. Turbulence Model

The standardκ-ε two-equation turbulence model was adopted, and the finite volume method was used to discretize the governing equations. Simulation analysis was conducted based on mass conservation, momentum conservation, turbulent kinetic energy, diffusive species equations, turbulent dissipation rate equations, and energy equation [13].The diffusion conservation equation is expressed as follows:(1)∂ρC∂t+∂ρCuj∂xj=∂∂xjρDm∂C∂xj+ρd˙.In (1), ρ is the density of a fluid or a solid, xj stands for the coordinates, uj is the velocity of flow in xj direction, d˙ is the source term of diffusive species, C is the concentration of a diffusive species, and Dm is the diffusion coefficient.


## 4. Result Analysis and Discussion

### 4.1. Numerical Method Validation

The numerical simulation results of the 33% scale fastback model compared with existing experimental results are shown in Figure4. The propane concentration distribution and diffusion tendency in the different x/l sections are consistent with the experimental data. Considering that this study performs qualitative research on exhaust diffusion in various models of wake flow fields, we determined that the CFD simulation results were valid. Thus, the mesh strategy and boundary conditions can be used in a subsequent study.Figure 4
Propane concentration distribution ofx/l.


### 4.2. Comparison of Three Model Concentration Fields

#### 4.2.1. Comparison ofz/b=0.5612 Section

The flow that passes through the bottom of the body entered the up-wash region (Figure5) as a result of the tail inclination in the square-back and notchback models. The exhaust gas diffused upward after being affected by the flow, as shown in Figure 6. At the same time, the exhaust gas entered the low-speed region behind the car because of the influence of the clockwise vortex. The low-speed area of the square-back was larger than the low-speed area of the notchback, so the exhaust gas diffusion area was also larger. This condition is illustrated in the first two pictures in Figure 6.Figure 5
Velocity vector ofz/b=0.5612.Figure 6
Propane concentration distribution ofz/b=0.5612.Comparatively, almost no airflow occurred in the up-wash region and the exhaust gas diffused backward directly because the fastback model had no tail inclination. A small amount of exhaust gas entered the low-speed region. The exhaust gas diffusion distance was longer than that of the notchback model of the same height.


#### 4.2.2. Comparison ofy/h Sections

They/h sections crossed with the exhaust pipe are discussed in this part of the paper. The sections of the square-back and notchback models are represented as y/h=0.2722, and the section of the fastback model is y/h=0.0796.As shown in Figure7, a high-speed stream occurred in the wake region of the square-back model. The distribution of the concentration formed a clockwise structure when the stream flowed into the low-speed wake region, as shown in the first picture of Figure 8. Comparing Figures 7 and 8 proves the dependency of diffusing the concentration field on the wake flow field.Figure 7
Velocity vector on they/h section.Figure 8
Propane concentration distribution ofy/h.In analyzing the concentration field on thez/b=0.5612 section (Figure 5), we determined that the exhaust of the square-back and notchback models went up into the low-speed region. However, the exhaust of the fastback model had minimal changes in the flow direction and was then dragged backward by the airflow. Thus, the amount of exhaust gas that flowed into the low-speed wake region was the least among the three models. Figure 8 shows that the exhaust gas in the fastback model has the longest diffusion distance.The airflow moved from the center to the side in they/h=0.0796 section in the fastback model, as shown in the third picture of Figure 7. The propane (C3H8) was also diffused outward as indicated by the concentration field in Figure 8. The other two models show that the diffusion tendency of the concentration field coincided with the corresponding velocity field of the wake flow.


#### 4.2.3. Comparison ofx/l=0.036 Section

The distributions of propane concentration in thex/l=0.036 section of the three models are shown in Figure 10. This figure illustrates that the propane concentration was mainly diffused outward from the autobody in the horizontal direction and upward in the vertical direction. The reason for this condition is shown in Figure 9, which expresses the velocity vector in the same sections. This result is consistent with the relationship between the flow concentration and velocity as described in this paper.Figure 9
Velocity vector onx/l=0.036 section.Figure 10
Propane concentration distribution ofx/l=0.036.Figure5 shows that the area of the low-speed wake region of the square-back model was the largest, whereas that of the notchback model was the smallest. Thus, the exhaust gas of the square-back model had the largest diffusion region, and the diffusion region of the notchback model was the smallest and had the largest concentration gradient (Figure 10).Propane diffusion mainly occurred in the body wake zone, as shown in Figure10. The back view shows that the diffusion never extended beyond the body outline. The reason is that the airflow from the top and side of the body was faster than that in the wake region, as illustrated in Figures 6 and 7. These figures also demonstrate that the trace gas diffusion process was mainly affected by the wake flow field, but the concentration gradient was not.


### 4.3. Notchback MIRA Model Wind Tunnel Test

The automotive wind tunnel at Jilin University is an open reflux wind tunnel. Figure11 shows the tunnel structure diagram.Figure 11
The tunnel structure diagram of Jilin University.The MIRA notchback 1:2 model was tested in the wind tunnel to examine the dispersion characteristics more intuitively. A Vicount 180 smoke generator system was used as the source of smoke, and a pipe was used to lead the smoke to the rear of the car. The diameter of the particles generated by the smoke generator was 0.2 microns to 0.3 microns. The smoke generator system is shown in Figure12.Figure 12
Smoke generator.The model was placed directly in the test section. The model and placement are shown in Figure13.Figure 13
Model in placement test section.The exhaust pipe was fixed at 225 mm from the center line of the model and was parallel to the centerline during the test to be consistent with the exhaust pipe position in the numerical simulation. The actual vehicle exhaust pipe inner diameter was approximately 4 cm; thus, the pipe diameter was approximately 2 cm in the test. Given the actual circumstances in the wind tunnel test section, the exhaust pipe was fixed at the right side of the model, as presented in Figure14 (the model is shown backwards from the front).Figure 14
Exhaust pipe installation location.Considering the experimental model for steel structures, we used the pressure measurement mainly to compare the flow field of the numerical simulation and verify the simulation accuracy. This test measured 26 pressure points on the body and center line of the rear body symmetry. Figure15 illustrates the relative position of each pressure point.Figure 15
Schematic arrangement of measurement points.The MIRA notchback 1:2 model was tested in the pressure test and flow pattern trial. The specific test program is presented in Table1.Table 1
Specific test program of MIRA notchback 1:2 model.
Experimental model
Experimental method
Wheel angle
Speed (m/s)
MIRA notchback 1:2 model
Pressure test
0°
13, 20
Plume law
0°
13The pressure coefficients measured in the wind tunnel tests were 13 m/s and 20 m/s, and the numerical simulation at 13 m/s is shown in Figure16. The pressure coefficient curves measured under the two test wind speeds were coincidental, and the differences were almost difficult to observe. The pressure coefficient trend in the numerical simulation was consistent with the experimental value. The pressure coefficients in the hood and windshield junction, as well as the windshield edges, were slightly different. This difference was caused by the improper fitting of the sludge structure with the wallpaper and a vortex between the wallpaper and model. However, the pressure coefficient monitored in the tail almost coincided; this condition verifies the consistency of the wake field data between the test and numerical simulation to a certain extent.Figure 16
Pressure coefficient (Cp) contrast curve.Analyzing the numerical simulation results in the previous section shows that the underbody airflow exhibited an uptrend because of the notchback model tail inclination. The exhaust plume diffusion shows an upward trend because it was affected by the rising airflow. The plume was generated in the low-speed areas after being affected by the counterclockwise trailing vortex, as shown in Figure17.Figure 17
Uptrend trend.The plume diffusion region was mainly located in the automotive wake region. Given that the airflow speed that passes through the top and side of the body was higher than the tail, the exhaust gas diffusion region barely exceeded the outer contour of the body, as shown in Figure18.Figure 18
Near wake region diffusion profile.Another important feature of the plume diffusion in 3D space was that it spiraled backwards, as shown in Figure19. The structure of the wake flow field was unobserved because of the limited test conditions. The characteristics were then analyzed using the numerical simulation results in the previous section.Figure 19
Spiral diffusion schematic.The numerical simulation result of the velocity field in the three-section rear of the notchback car was analyzed. The three sections arex/l=0.036, x/l=0.146, and x/l=0.292. Three cross-sections relative to the position of the vehicle are shown in Figure 20. The velocity fields in the three sections are presented in Figures 21 to 23. Yellow represents the velocity field of the high-speed zone and blue represents the low-speed zone.Figure 20
Relative positions of three sections.Figure 21
Velocity field of sectionx/l=0.036.Figure 22
Velocity field of sectionx/l=0.146.Figure 23
Velocity field of sectionx/l=0.292.Figures21 to 23 illustrate that two reverse swirls occur in the rear of the car and the airflow moves backward after being affected by the high-velocity gas stream flowing outside the body and bottom (Figure 7). Therefore, the interaction of the two air flows resulted in a spiral trend for the flow. The analysis of the tracer-gas diffusion characteristics in the previous section shows that the diffusion was mainly influenced by the tail gas stream. Thus, the plume diffusion still spiraled backwards, as shown in Figure 19.


## 4.1. Numerical Method Validation

The numerical simulation results of the 33% scale fastback model compared with existing experimental results are shown in Figure4. The propane concentration distribution and diffusion tendency in the different x/l sections are consistent with the experimental data. Considering that this study performs qualitative research on exhaust diffusion in various models of wake flow fields, we determined that the CFD simulation results were valid. Thus, the mesh strategy and boundary conditions can be used in a subsequent study.Figure 4
Propane concentration distribution ofx/l.


## 4.2. Comparison of Three Model Concentration Fields

### 4.2.1. Comparison ofz/b=0.5612 Section

The flow that passes through the bottom of the body entered the up-wash region (Figure5) as a result of the tail inclination in the square-back and notchback models. The exhaust gas diffused upward after being affected by the flow, as shown in Figure 6. At the same time, the exhaust gas entered the low-speed region behind the car because of the influence of the clockwise vortex. The low-speed area of the square-back was larger than the low-speed area of the notchback, so the exhaust gas diffusion area was also larger. This condition is illustrated in the first two pictures in Figure 6.Figure 5
Velocity vector ofz/b=0.5612.Figure 6
Propane concentration distribution ofz/b=0.5612.Comparatively, almost no airflow occurred in the up-wash region and the exhaust gas diffused backward directly because the fastback model had no tail inclination. A small amount of exhaust gas entered the low-speed region. The exhaust gas diffusion distance was longer than that of the notchback model of the same height.


### 4.2.2. Comparison ofy/h Sections

They/h sections crossed with the exhaust pipe are discussed in this part of the paper. The sections of the square-back and notchback models are represented as y/h=0.2722, and the section of the fastback model is y/h=0.0796.As shown in Figure7, a high-speed stream occurred in the wake region of the square-back model. The distribution of the concentration formed a clockwise structure when the stream flowed into the low-speed wake region, as shown in the first picture of Figure 8. Comparing Figures 7 and 8 proves the dependency of diffusing the concentration field on the wake flow field.Figure 7
Velocity vector on they/h section.Figure 8
Propane concentration distribution ofy/h.In analyzing the concentration field on thez/b=0.5612 section (Figure 5), we determined that the exhaust of the square-back and notchback models went up into the low-speed region. However, the exhaust of the fastback model had minimal changes in the flow direction and was then dragged backward by the airflow. Thus, the amount of exhaust gas that flowed into the low-speed wake region was the least among the three models. Figure 8 shows that the exhaust gas in the fastback model has the longest diffusion distance.The airflow moved from the center to the side in they/h=0.0796 section in the fastback model, as shown in the third picture of Figure 7. The propane (C3H8) was also diffused outward as indicated by the concentration field in Figure 8. The other two models show that the diffusion tendency of the concentration field coincided with the corresponding velocity field of the wake flow.


### 4.2.3. Comparison ofx/l=0.036 Section

The distributions of propane concentration in thex/l=0.036 section of the three models are shown in Figure 10. This figure illustrates that the propane concentration was mainly diffused outward from the autobody in the horizontal direction and upward in the vertical direction. The reason for this condition is shown in Figure 9, which expresses the velocity vector in the same sections. This result is consistent with the relationship between the flow concentration and velocity as described in this paper.Figure 9
Velocity vector onx/l=0.036 section.Figure 10
Propane concentration distribution ofx/l=0.036.Figure5 shows that the area of the low-speed wake region of the square-back model was the largest, whereas that of the notchback model was the smallest. Thus, the exhaust gas of the square-back model had the largest diffusion region, and the diffusion region of the notchback model was the smallest and had the largest concentration gradient (Figure 10).Propane diffusion mainly occurred in the body wake zone, as shown in Figure10. The back view shows that the diffusion never extended beyond the body outline. The reason is that the airflow from the top and side of the body was faster than that in the wake region, as illustrated in Figures 6 and 7. These figures also demonstrate that the trace gas diffusion process was mainly affected by the wake flow field, but the concentration gradient was not.


## 4.2.1. Comparison ofz/b=0.5612 Section

The flow that passes through the bottom of the body entered the up-wash region (Figure5) as a result of the tail inclination in the square-back and notchback models. The exhaust gas diffused upward after being affected by the flow, as shown in Figure 6. At the same time, the exhaust gas entered the low-speed region behind the car because of the influence of the clockwise vortex. The low-speed area of the square-back was larger than the low-speed area of the notchback, so the exhaust gas diffusion area was also larger. This condition is illustrated in the first two pictures in Figure 6.Figure 5
Velocity vector ofz/b=0.5612.Figure 6
Propane concentration distribution ofz/b=0.5612.Comparatively, almost no airflow occurred in the up-wash region and the exhaust gas diffused backward directly because the fastback model had no tail inclination. A small amount of exhaust gas entered the low-speed region. The exhaust gas diffusion distance was longer than that of the notchback model of the same height.


## 4.2.2. Comparison ofy/h Sections

They/h sections crossed with the exhaust pipe are discussed in this part of the paper. The sections of the square-back and notchback models are represented as y/h=0.2722, and the section of the fastback model is y/h=0.0796.As shown in Figure7, a high-speed stream occurred in the wake region of the square-back model. The distribution of the concentration formed a clockwise structure when the stream flowed into the low-speed wake region, as shown in the first picture of Figure 8. Comparing Figures 7 and 8 proves the dependency of diffusing the concentration field on the wake flow field.Figure 7
Velocity vector on they/h section.Figure 8
Propane concentration distribution ofy/h.In analyzing the concentration field on thez/b=0.5612 section (Figure 5), we determined that the exhaust of the square-back and notchback models went up into the low-speed region. However, the exhaust of the fastback model had minimal changes in the flow direction and was then dragged backward by the airflow. Thus, the amount of exhaust gas that flowed into the low-speed wake region was the least among the three models. Figure 8 shows that the exhaust gas in the fastback model has the longest diffusion distance.The airflow moved from the center to the side in they/h=0.0796 section in the fastback model, as shown in the third picture of Figure 7. The propane (C3H8) was also diffused outward as indicated by the concentration field in Figure 8. The other two models show that the diffusion tendency of the concentration field coincided with the corresponding velocity field of the wake flow.


## 4.2.3. Comparison ofx/l=0.036 Section

The distributions of propane concentration in thex/l=0.036 section of the three models are shown in Figure 10. This figure illustrates that the propane concentration was mainly diffused outward from the autobody in the horizontal direction and upward in the vertical direction. The reason for this condition is shown in Figure 9, which expresses the velocity vector in the same sections. This result is consistent with the relationship between the flow concentration and velocity as described in this paper.Figure 9
Velocity vector onx/l=0.036 section.Figure 10
Propane concentration distribution ofx/l=0.036.Figure5 shows that the area of the low-speed wake region of the square-back model was the largest, whereas that of the notchback model was the smallest. Thus, the exhaust gas of the square-back model had the largest diffusion region, and the diffusion region of the notchback model was the smallest and had the largest concentration gradient (Figure 10).Propane diffusion mainly occurred in the body wake zone, as shown in Figure10. The back view shows that the diffusion never extended beyond the body outline. The reason is that the airflow from the top and side of the body was faster than that in the wake region, as illustrated in Figures 6 and 7. These figures also demonstrate that the trace gas diffusion process was mainly affected by the wake flow field, but the concentration gradient was not.


## 4.3. Notchback MIRA Model Wind Tunnel Test

The automotive wind tunnel at Jilin University is an open reflux wind tunnel. Figure11 shows the tunnel structure diagram.Figure 11
The tunnel structure diagram of Jilin University.The MIRA notchback 1:2 model was tested in the wind tunnel to examine the dispersion characteristics more intuitively. A Vicount 180 smoke generator system was used as the source of smoke, and a pipe was used to lead the smoke to the rear of the car. The diameter of the particles generated by the smoke generator was 0.2 microns to 0.3 microns. The smoke generator system is shown in Figure12.Figure 12
Smoke generator.The model was placed directly in the test section. The model and placement are shown in Figure13.Figure 13
Model in placement test section.The exhaust pipe was fixed at 225 mm from the center line of the model and was parallel to the centerline during the test to be consistent with the exhaust pipe position in the numerical simulation. The actual vehicle exhaust pipe inner diameter was approximately 4 cm; thus, the pipe diameter was approximately 2 cm in the test. Given the actual circumstances in the wind tunnel test section, the exhaust pipe was fixed at the right side of the model, as presented in Figure14 (the model is shown backwards from the front).Figure 14
Exhaust pipe installation location.Considering the experimental model for steel structures, we used the pressure measurement mainly to compare the flow field of the numerical simulation and verify the simulation accuracy. This test measured 26 pressure points on the body and center line of the rear body symmetry. Figure15 illustrates the relative position of each pressure point.Figure 15
Schematic arrangement of measurement points.The MIRA notchback 1:2 model was tested in the pressure test and flow pattern trial. The specific test program is presented in Table1.Table 1
Specific test program of MIRA notchback 1:2 model.
Experimental model
Experimental method
Wheel angle
Speed (m/s)
MIRA notchback 1:2 model
Pressure test
0°
13, 20
Plume law
0°
13The pressure coefficients measured in the wind tunnel tests were 13 m/s and 20 m/s, and the numerical simulation at 13 m/s is shown in Figure16. The pressure coefficient curves measured under the two test wind speeds were coincidental, and the differences were almost difficult to observe. The pressure coefficient trend in the numerical simulation was consistent with the experimental value. The pressure coefficients in the hood and windshield junction, as well as the windshield edges, were slightly different. This difference was caused by the improper fitting of the sludge structure with the wallpaper and a vortex between the wallpaper and model. However, the pressure coefficient monitored in the tail almost coincided; this condition verifies the consistency of the wake field data between the test and numerical simulation to a certain extent.Figure 16
Pressure coefficient (Cp) contrast curve.Analyzing the numerical simulation results in the previous section shows that the underbody airflow exhibited an uptrend because of the notchback model tail inclination. The exhaust plume diffusion shows an upward trend because it was affected by the rising airflow. The plume was generated in the low-speed areas after being affected by the counterclockwise trailing vortex, as shown in Figure17.Figure 17
Uptrend trend.The plume diffusion region was mainly located in the automotive wake region. Given that the airflow speed that passes through the top and side of the body was higher than the tail, the exhaust gas diffusion region barely exceeded the outer contour of the body, as shown in Figure18.Figure 18
Near wake region diffusion profile.Another important feature of the plume diffusion in 3D space was that it spiraled backwards, as shown in Figure19. The structure of the wake flow field was unobserved because of the limited test conditions. The characteristics were then analyzed using the numerical simulation results in the previous section.Figure 19
Spiral diffusion schematic.The numerical simulation result of the velocity field in the three-section rear of the notchback car was analyzed. The three sections arex/l=0.036, x/l=0.146, and x/l=0.292. Three cross-sections relative to the position of the vehicle are shown in Figure 20. The velocity fields in the three sections are presented in Figures 21 to 23. Yellow represents the velocity field of the high-speed zone and blue represents the low-speed zone.Figure 20
Relative positions of three sections.Figure 21
Velocity field of sectionx/l=0.036.Figure 22
Velocity field of sectionx/l=0.146.Figure 23
Velocity field of sectionx/l=0.292.Figures21 to 23 illustrate that two reverse swirls occur in the rear of the car and the airflow moves backward after being affected by the high-velocity gas stream flowing outside the body and bottom (Figure 7). Therefore, the interaction of the two air flows resulted in a spiral trend for the flow. The analysis of the tracer-gas diffusion characteristics in the previous section shows that the diffusion was mainly influenced by the tail gas stream. Thus, the plume diffusion still spiraled backwards, as shown in Figure 19.


## 5. Conclusions

Three MIRA models were used to investigate exhaust gas diffusion. The exhaust gas diffusion process was mainly affected by the wake flow field and directly related to the velocity field. The exhaust gas spread upward in theY direction and outward in the Z direction.The wake area of the square-back model was larger and had an inclination on the tail, so the exhaust gas diffusion had the largest diffusion region in the wake field. The notchback had a minimum wake region, and the exhaust gas was involved in a trailing vortex because of the tail inclination. Thus, the diffusion region was the smallest. The exhaust gas for the fastback model, which had no tail inclination, was directly dragged into the wake region by a high-speed stream from the bottom of the body. The diffusion distance on the horizontal plane was also the longest.



---

*Source: 879735-2015-08-04.xml*