# Response Analysis of Deep Foundation Excavation and Dewatering on Surface Settlements

Authors: Xian Li; Tingguo Zhou; Yixian Wang; Junling Han; Yanqiao Wang; Fang Tong; Delong Li; Jinmei Wen
Journal: Advances in Civil Engineering
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

Accurate prediction of surface settlements is a primary concern when deep excavations were carrying out under the water table in urban environments for the safety of the work site. The sedimentation deformation due to deep excavation of foundation pit and dewatering occurs as a result of coupling action of the two factors. The study is aimed at revealing the coupling ground response to the two factors and developing empirical correlations for estimating ground deformations. Taking a deep foundation pit of a metro station as an example, surface settlement estimations were calculated by analytical formulas and numerical models. The settlement results by analytical formulas under excavation and dewatering conditions were added linearly to the total settlements. And three-dimensional coupling numerical models were established by applying commercial software (GMS and MIDAS) to investigate the interaction impact of excavation and dewatering on the sedimentation deformation. Comparing with monitoring data, numerical simulation results match well with the monitoring data. Furthermore, an empirical surface subsidence correlation equation was developed by the polynomial fitting to illustrate the effect contribution on the total surface settlement of foundation excavation and dewatering.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Deep underground constructions built below the water table are inevitable in the urban region with the continuous city development. Due to the influence of groundwater, foundation pit dewatering becomes an auxiliary project that must be carried out in the process of deep excavation. A major concern for the urban deep excavations is the induced deformations in the surrounding soil and the subsequent impact on adjacent structures [1–5]. Erroneous estimates of sedimentation deformations may result in either large construction costs due to excessive ground support or damage to the surrounding structures due to inadequate excavation support. The factors such as construction technique, dewatering, and soil type have significant influences on the predicted deformations [6, 7].Most of the main theories about settlement caused by excavation are based on the total stress method proposed by Peck based on curve-fitting of an enormous amount of field monitoring results [8–11]. The monitoring data show that the calculation results underestimate the actual settlement. Differences between measurements and theoretical predictions could be attributed to the effect of dewatering. The dewatering process can cause the depressurization of aquifers triggering the changes in effective stresses. When water is extracted from an aquifer, the effective stresses on the soil mass within it increase causing land subsidence [12–15]. Significant results have been achieved in land subsidence research, but the main factors causing land subsidence are excavation and dewatering [16–18]. Based on the linear superposition of the settlement caused by excavation and dewatering, the total surface settlement can be simply obtained but the interaction between stress release and groundwater level drop is ignored.Taking a deep foundation pit of a metro station as an example, this paper is aimed at investigating the interaction response to surface settlement of deep foundation and dewatering. The total linear superposition settlements were calculated by analytical formulas under excavation and dewatering conditions. And three-dimensional coupling numerical models were established by commercial software (GMS and MIDAS) to obtain the response on the groundwater level, effective stresses, and the displacement of excavation and dewatering. Then, the two predicted surface settlement results were compared with the monitoring data to verify the validity of the two methods.


## 2. Materials

### 2.1. Project Description

The metro station foundation pit is located at the area of central China with the size of 120 m × 15 m × 22.4 m(length × width × depth). There is a river that goes round the west and south side of the station foundation pit with the minimum distance of 24 m. The main structure of the shield shaft section is only 4.5 m away from the river bank. On the northwest side of the foundation pit is a hotel named building 1. The main building of this hotel has 29 floors, and the five-storey building is pile foundation with the minimum distance of 10.7 meters away from the foundation pit. And the southeast side is a shopping mall named building 2 with 18 floors and the minimum distance of 10 meters. Its foundations are all pile foundations. The northeast side is building 3 with 6 floors. The location of the engineering site is shown in Figure1.Figure 1
The location of the project site.The metro station foundation pit is mainly located in the alluvial-diluvial silty clay, silty soil, and fine sand layer with poor stability. The possibility of liquefaction exists in the fine sand layer, which has certain influence on the working process. The detailed geological profile of the site is shown in Figure2.Figure 2
Detailed geological profile of the site.The deep foundation excavation process was divided into five stages, namely, stage I, stage II, stage III, stage IV, and stage V, each with an excavation depth of 1.4 m, 2.7 m, 4.5 m, 6.4 m, and 7.4 m, respectively. Each excavation floor level was 24.1 m, 21.4 m, 16.9 m, 10.6 m, and 3.2 m. The foundation pit dewatering was carried out along with the excavation stage, ensuring that the groundwater table was 0.5 m below the bottom of the foundation pit. The initial groundwater level was 23 m. Foundation pit dewatering was not required during stage I of foundation excavation because the bottom of the foundation pit is higher than the groundwater level. The dewatering process started from stage II of foundation excavation which was divided into four stages of foundation dewatering.


### 2.2. Monitoring of Settlements

Before the construction process of the station foundation pit, pumping wells were set parallel along the side line of the foundation pit. In order to make the surrounding soil surface settlement and groundwater level meet the requirements of the design specifications, a steel ruler water level gauge SWJ-90-50 recording foundation was arranged between adjacent pumping wells along the length of the foundation pit. During the dewatering process, the water level near the pumping well fluctuated. Trimble DiNi03 electronic level was set at a vertical interval of 5 m along the center line of the foundation pit to measure surface subsidence (see Table1); at the same time, inspections of surface subsidence were carried out on building 1, building 2, and building 3. The layout map of various measuring points is given in Figure 3.Table 1
Monitoring equipments.
NumberMonitor itemsEquipmentMeasuring accuracy (mm)Frequency1Surface settlementTrimble DiNi031.0Once/3 days2Groundwater levelSWJ-90-505.0Once/3 days3Building settlementTrimble DiNi031.0Once/3 daysFigure 3
Monitoring point layout map.There were many monitoring points on the site, represented by DB-1, JCJ-6, JCJ-9, and JCJ-15 observation points. The ground surface settlement values of the DB-1, JCJ-6, JCJ-9, and JCJ-15 settlement monitoring groups were selected to display the effect of the deep foundation excavation process on the control of surrounding environment deformation (see Figure4). The settlement of each measuring point gradually increased over time, and the settlement rate reached its maximum 25 days prior to construction. The settlement values measured at the nearest monitoring point (DB-1) to the foundation pit were the largest value. The results of the other three monitoring points showed the similar flat trends of the settlement values. The greater the self-weight stress of the building next to the monitoring point was, the greater the monitored settlement values were.Figure 4
Settlement values of monitoring points.


## 2.1. Project Description

The metro station foundation pit is located at the area of central China with the size of 120 m × 15 m × 22.4 m(length × width × depth). There is a river that goes round the west and south side of the station foundation pit with the minimum distance of 24 m. The main structure of the shield shaft section is only 4.5 m away from the river bank. On the northwest side of the foundation pit is a hotel named building 1. The main building of this hotel has 29 floors, and the five-storey building is pile foundation with the minimum distance of 10.7 meters away from the foundation pit. And the southeast side is a shopping mall named building 2 with 18 floors and the minimum distance of 10 meters. Its foundations are all pile foundations. The northeast side is building 3 with 6 floors. The location of the engineering site is shown in Figure1.Figure 1
The location of the project site.The metro station foundation pit is mainly located in the alluvial-diluvial silty clay, silty soil, and fine sand layer with poor stability. The possibility of liquefaction exists in the fine sand layer, which has certain influence on the working process. The detailed geological profile of the site is shown in Figure2.Figure 2
Detailed geological profile of the site.The deep foundation excavation process was divided into five stages, namely, stage I, stage II, stage III, stage IV, and stage V, each with an excavation depth of 1.4 m, 2.7 m, 4.5 m, 6.4 m, and 7.4 m, respectively. Each excavation floor level was 24.1 m, 21.4 m, 16.9 m, 10.6 m, and 3.2 m. The foundation pit dewatering was carried out along with the excavation stage, ensuring that the groundwater table was 0.5 m below the bottom of the foundation pit. The initial groundwater level was 23 m. Foundation pit dewatering was not required during stage I of foundation excavation because the bottom of the foundation pit is higher than the groundwater level. The dewatering process started from stage II of foundation excavation which was divided into four stages of foundation dewatering.


## 2.2. Monitoring of Settlements

Before the construction process of the station foundation pit, pumping wells were set parallel along the side line of the foundation pit. In order to make the surrounding soil surface settlement and groundwater level meet the requirements of the design specifications, a steel ruler water level gauge SWJ-90-50 recording foundation was arranged between adjacent pumping wells along the length of the foundation pit. During the dewatering process, the water level near the pumping well fluctuated. Trimble DiNi03 electronic level was set at a vertical interval of 5 m along the center line of the foundation pit to measure surface subsidence (see Table1); at the same time, inspections of surface subsidence were carried out on building 1, building 2, and building 3. The layout map of various measuring points is given in Figure 3.Table 1
Monitoring equipments.
NumberMonitor itemsEquipmentMeasuring accuracy (mm)Frequency1Surface settlementTrimble DiNi031.0Once/3 days2Groundwater levelSWJ-90-505.0Once/3 days3Building settlementTrimble DiNi031.0Once/3 daysFigure 3
Monitoring point layout map.There were many monitoring points on the site, represented by DB-1, JCJ-6, JCJ-9, and JCJ-15 observation points. The ground surface settlement values of the DB-1, JCJ-6, JCJ-9, and JCJ-15 settlement monitoring groups were selected to display the effect of the deep foundation excavation process on the control of surrounding environment deformation (see Figure4). The settlement of each measuring point gradually increased over time, and the settlement rate reached its maximum 25 days prior to construction. The settlement values measured at the nearest monitoring point (DB-1) to the foundation pit were the largest value. The results of the other three monitoring points showed the similar flat trends of the settlement values. The greater the self-weight stress of the building next to the monitoring point was, the greater the monitored settlement values were.Figure 4
Settlement values of monitoring points.


## 3. Settlement Estimation

### 3.1. Settlement Estimation by Analytical Formulas

During the construction of deep foundation pits below the water table, in order to prevent damages such as foundation pit collapse and surge in the pit, the groundwater level should be lowered to 0.5 m below the bottom of the foundation pit before construction.A cone of depression was formed which caused decrease of groundwater pressure between soils and increase in effective stress between soil particles. In the process of foundation pit dewatering, groundwater moves slowly in laminar flow, and the dewatering curve is distributed symmetrically along the pumping well. Dupuit formula is introduced as the dewatering depression curve equation as follows [19]:(1)y2=l+h2+H2−l+h2lnx/rlnR/r,where x is the horizontal distance from the center of the well axis; l is the length of the water filter pipe of the dewatering well; r is the radius of the pumping well; h is the vertical distance from the partially penetrating well to the aquifer; and the full penetrating well h = 0, and the radius of dewatering influence is R.During the dewatering process, there is air inside the unsaturated zone, and the pore water will be tensioned. The balanced differential equation and stress differential equation of the soil particles and pore water can be combined to obtain a unified effective stress equation applicable to unsaturated soil and saturated soil [20]:(2)σ′=σ−ua+Seua−uw,Se=S−Sr1−Sr=θ−θrθs−θr,τ=ua−uw.In the formula,Se and Sr are the effective saturation and residual saturation of the soil, respectively; θs and θr are the saturated volumetric water content and residual volumetric water content, respectively; τ is the matrix suction, measured by unsaturated soil triaxial apparatus and pressure plate instrument. When the effective volume saturation Se is equal to 1, the equation returns to the effective stress equation of saturated soil.Effective soil stress in the area above the water level did not change before excavation, and the effective stress of the soil in the unsaturated area changed as follows:(3)Δσ1′=γwH−y+Se−1τ.For saturated soil, the pores between soil particles are completely filled with water, and the drop of groundwater level causes the pore water pressure decreasing. The equation returns to the saturated soil effective stress equation, and the effective stress change value is the water pressure decrease:(4)Δσ2′=γwH−y.Surface settlements caused by dewatering can be calculated by the layerwise summation method as follows:(5)s=∑i=1nsi=∑i=1nΔσi′Eihi.In the formula,s is the surface settlements which caused dewatering; si is the surface settlements of layer i; Ei is the soil elastic modulus of layer i; and hi is the thickness of layer i.According to the layerwise summation formula, the effective stress of the soil in the dry soil area has not changed, so in dry soil, areas1 = 0.Settlement of the soil layer in the unsaturated zone is as follows:(6)s2=∑i=1nγwH−y+τSe−1Eihi.Settlement of soil layer in saturated zone is as follows:(7)s3=∑i=1nγwH−yEihi.The excavation of the foundation pit leads to soil unloading which breaks the balance of the self-weight stress in the excavation area and ground settlement. According to the empirical formula formed by the Rayleigh distribution function, the amount of ground settlement caused by foundation pit excavation is calculated as follows [8]:(8)s4=svm⋅d/H+0.750.9⋅exp−d/H+0.7524.5,svm=αshm,shm=kδH,where d is the distance from the excavation point to the center of the foundation pit; H is the excavation depth; svm is the maximum settlement of the foundation pit excavation; shm is the maximum deformation of the enclosure; α is the empirical coefficient; and kδ is the proportional coefficient. The two settlements are superimposed and summed to estimate the amount of ground settlement caused by the dewatering and excavation of the foundation pit. And the settlement caused by excavation and dewatering is the sum of the above:(9)s=s1+s2+s3+s4.The physical and mechanical parameters of the soil layer are shown in Table2. The geotechnical parameters were determined by the conventional testing [21–23].Table 2
The physical and mechanical parameters of the soil layer.
NameThicknessH (m)Elastic modulusE (MPa)Cohesionc (kPa)Friction angleφ (°)Poisson’s ratiovPermeabilityk (m/d)Miscellaneous fill3.181510—0.05Silty clay1.71210240.350.01Silt510——0.31Strongly weathered argillaceous sandstone2.75350260.241Moderately weathered argillaceous sandstone—50130330.231The calculated results by analytical formulas are shown in Figure5. The DB series of monitoring points are distributed symmetrically along the foundation pit, which can better indicate the law of surface settlement. From Figure 5, dewatering is the major factor triggering the surface settlements. The maximum settlements occurred at DB-1 point, accounting for 88.9% of the total subsidence. The distances to the foundation pit from DB-1 point to DB-4 point increased. As the monitoring point was farther away from the foundation pit, the slower the decline rate of groundwater level was, the smaller the change of effective stress of soil layer was, resulting in smaller proportion of dewatering contributing to surface settlement.Figure 5
Theoretical calculation of surface settlement.


### 3.2. Settlement Estimation by Numerical Models

In this paper, three-dimensional coupling numerical models were established by applying commercial software (GMS and MIDAS) to investigate the interaction impact of excavation and dewatering on the sedimentation deformation (see Figure6). The width of the river is about 30 ∼ 80 m, and the elevation of the river bottom is about 5 ∼ 6 m. The calculated parameters adopted the value as shown in Table 2.Figure 6
Meshing of numerical models.
(a)(b)Figure7 indicates the evolution of groundwater level after each stage of dewatering. In the dewatering process, the groundwater level was distributed in a funnel shape with the dewatering well near the foundation pit as the center. The farther the distance from the center of the foundation pit is, the smaller the drop of groundwater level is (see Figure 8).Figure 7
Contours of groundwater level after each dewatering stage. (a) After the first stage of dewatering. (b) After the second stage of dewatering. (c) After the third stage of dewatering. (d) After the fourth stage of dewatering.
(a)(b)(c)(d)Figure 8
The profile of the groundwater table after the fourth dewatering stage.Figure9 shows the simulated surface settlements at each excavation stage. During the first excavation of the foundation pit, the excavation depth was 1.4 m, and the supporting structure was not completed at this time. Due to the unloading effect of the soil, the foundation was uplifted. The settlement curve is distributed as a “spoon” shape from the horizontal distance of the excavation center of the foundation pit. The settlement value increased with the increase of distance from the foundation pit at the distance ranging from 0 to 8 m. However, the values of settlement decreased with the increase of distance from the foundation pit when the distance was greater than 8 m. The accumulated settlement of five excavations reaches the maximum at the fifth stage of excavation, which is 26.1 mm.Figure 9
Surface settlement curve.


### 3.3. Comparison of Results between Calculated Results and Settlement Monitoring Data

Figure10 shows the comparison between calculated results and settlement monitoring data. The numerical simulation results obtained from a fluid-solid coupling model matched well with the monitoring data than the analytical calculation results, which suggested that the impact of excavation and dewatering on surface settlement cannot simply be added together. As the groundwater level dropped, the effective stress in the soil increased which changed the porosity of the soil and indirectly changed the state of water movement. However, the analytical calculation method directly superimposes the settlement caused by dewatering and excavation, which did not consider the interaction between water and soil leading to the larger result than the monitored data.Figure 10
Comparison between different settlement values.


## 3.1. Settlement Estimation by Analytical Formulas

During the construction of deep foundation pits below the water table, in order to prevent damages such as foundation pit collapse and surge in the pit, the groundwater level should be lowered to 0.5 m below the bottom of the foundation pit before construction.A cone of depression was formed which caused decrease of groundwater pressure between soils and increase in effective stress between soil particles. In the process of foundation pit dewatering, groundwater moves slowly in laminar flow, and the dewatering curve is distributed symmetrically along the pumping well. Dupuit formula is introduced as the dewatering depression curve equation as follows [19]:(1)y2=l+h2+H2−l+h2lnx/rlnR/r,where x is the horizontal distance from the center of the well axis; l is the length of the water filter pipe of the dewatering well; r is the radius of the pumping well; h is the vertical distance from the partially penetrating well to the aquifer; and the full penetrating well h = 0, and the radius of dewatering influence is R.During the dewatering process, there is air inside the unsaturated zone, and the pore water will be tensioned. The balanced differential equation and stress differential equation of the soil particles and pore water can be combined to obtain a unified effective stress equation applicable to unsaturated soil and saturated soil [20]:(2)σ′=σ−ua+Seua−uw,Se=S−Sr1−Sr=θ−θrθs−θr,τ=ua−uw.In the formula,Se and Sr are the effective saturation and residual saturation of the soil, respectively; θs and θr are the saturated volumetric water content and residual volumetric water content, respectively; τ is the matrix suction, measured by unsaturated soil triaxial apparatus and pressure plate instrument. When the effective volume saturation Se is equal to 1, the equation returns to the effective stress equation of saturated soil.Effective soil stress in the area above the water level did not change before excavation, and the effective stress of the soil in the unsaturated area changed as follows:(3)Δσ1′=γwH−y+Se−1τ.For saturated soil, the pores between soil particles are completely filled with water, and the drop of groundwater level causes the pore water pressure decreasing. The equation returns to the saturated soil effective stress equation, and the effective stress change value is the water pressure decrease:(4)Δσ2′=γwH−y.Surface settlements caused by dewatering can be calculated by the layerwise summation method as follows:(5)s=∑i=1nsi=∑i=1nΔσi′Eihi.In the formula,s is the surface settlements which caused dewatering; si is the surface settlements of layer i; Ei is the soil elastic modulus of layer i; and hi is the thickness of layer i.According to the layerwise summation formula, the effective stress of the soil in the dry soil area has not changed, so in dry soil, areas1 = 0.Settlement of the soil layer in the unsaturated zone is as follows:(6)s2=∑i=1nγwH−y+τSe−1Eihi.Settlement of soil layer in saturated zone is as follows:(7)s3=∑i=1nγwH−yEihi.The excavation of the foundation pit leads to soil unloading which breaks the balance of the self-weight stress in the excavation area and ground settlement. According to the empirical formula formed by the Rayleigh distribution function, the amount of ground settlement caused by foundation pit excavation is calculated as follows [8]:(8)s4=svm⋅d/H+0.750.9⋅exp−d/H+0.7524.5,svm=αshm,shm=kδH,where d is the distance from the excavation point to the center of the foundation pit; H is the excavation depth; svm is the maximum settlement of the foundation pit excavation; shm is the maximum deformation of the enclosure; α is the empirical coefficient; and kδ is the proportional coefficient. The two settlements are superimposed and summed to estimate the amount of ground settlement caused by the dewatering and excavation of the foundation pit. And the settlement caused by excavation and dewatering is the sum of the above:(9)s=s1+s2+s3+s4.The physical and mechanical parameters of the soil layer are shown in Table2. The geotechnical parameters were determined by the conventional testing [21–23].Table 2
The physical and mechanical parameters of the soil layer.
NameThicknessH (m)Elastic modulusE (MPa)Cohesionc (kPa)Friction angleφ (°)Poisson’s ratiovPermeabilityk (m/d)Miscellaneous fill3.181510—0.05Silty clay1.71210240.350.01Silt510——0.31Strongly weathered argillaceous sandstone2.75350260.241Moderately weathered argillaceous sandstone—50130330.231The calculated results by analytical formulas are shown in Figure5. The DB series of monitoring points are distributed symmetrically along the foundation pit, which can better indicate the law of surface settlement. From Figure 5, dewatering is the major factor triggering the surface settlements. The maximum settlements occurred at DB-1 point, accounting for 88.9% of the total subsidence. The distances to the foundation pit from DB-1 point to DB-4 point increased. As the monitoring point was farther away from the foundation pit, the slower the decline rate of groundwater level was, the smaller the change of effective stress of soil layer was, resulting in smaller proportion of dewatering contributing to surface settlement.Figure 5
Theoretical calculation of surface settlement.


## 3.2. Settlement Estimation by Numerical Models

In this paper, three-dimensional coupling numerical models were established by applying commercial software (GMS and MIDAS) to investigate the interaction impact of excavation and dewatering on the sedimentation deformation (see Figure6). The width of the river is about 30 ∼ 80 m, and the elevation of the river bottom is about 5 ∼ 6 m. The calculated parameters adopted the value as shown in Table 2.Figure 6
Meshing of numerical models.
(a)(b)Figure7 indicates the evolution of groundwater level after each stage of dewatering. In the dewatering process, the groundwater level was distributed in a funnel shape with the dewatering well near the foundation pit as the center. The farther the distance from the center of the foundation pit is, the smaller the drop of groundwater level is (see Figure 8).Figure 7
Contours of groundwater level after each dewatering stage. (a) After the first stage of dewatering. (b) After the second stage of dewatering. (c) After the third stage of dewatering. (d) After the fourth stage of dewatering.
(a)(b)(c)(d)Figure 8
The profile of the groundwater table after the fourth dewatering stage.Figure9 shows the simulated surface settlements at each excavation stage. During the first excavation of the foundation pit, the excavation depth was 1.4 m, and the supporting structure was not completed at this time. Due to the unloading effect of the soil, the foundation was uplifted. The settlement curve is distributed as a “spoon” shape from the horizontal distance of the excavation center of the foundation pit. The settlement value increased with the increase of distance from the foundation pit at the distance ranging from 0 to 8 m. However, the values of settlement decreased with the increase of distance from the foundation pit when the distance was greater than 8 m. The accumulated settlement of five excavations reaches the maximum at the fifth stage of excavation, which is 26.1 mm.Figure 9
Surface settlement curve.


## 3.3. Comparison of Results between Calculated Results and Settlement Monitoring Data

Figure10 shows the comparison between calculated results and settlement monitoring data. The numerical simulation results obtained from a fluid-solid coupling model matched well with the monitoring data than the analytical calculation results, which suggested that the impact of excavation and dewatering on surface settlement cannot simply be added together. As the groundwater level dropped, the effective stress in the soil increased which changed the porosity of the soil and indirectly changed the state of water movement. However, the analytical calculation method directly superimposes the settlement caused by dewatering and excavation, which did not consider the interaction between water and soil leading to the larger result than the monitored data.Figure 10
Comparison between different settlement values.


## 4. Discussion and Conclusions

This paper used analytical formulas and numerical models to simulate surface settlements of a deep foundation pit of a metro station aimed at investigating the interaction response to surface settlement of deep foundation and dewatering. The conclusions are as follows:(1)
The ground settlement caused by the construction of the foundation pit was distributed as a “spoon” shape centered on the foundation pit, which is proportional to the depth of the excavation. At a distance of 6.1 m from the center of the foundation pit, the settlement reached the maximum value of 26.1 mm. Analytical calculation results showed that the surface subsidence is mainly caused by dewatering. As the distance from the monitoring location to the center of the foundation pit was getting further, the lower the groundwater level falls, the smaller the effective stress change of the soil layer, which decreases the influence contribution of dewatering to the surface settlement.(2)
The numerical simulation results obtained from a fluid-solid coupling model matched well with the monitoring data than the analytical calculation results, which suggested that the impact of excavation and dewatering on surface settlement cannot simply be lineally added together. Therefore, an empirical surface subsidence correlations equation was developed by the polynomial fitting to illustrate the effect contribution on the total surface settlement of foundation excavation and dewatering (as shown in Figure11). The total settlement can be expressed by dewatering settlement and excavation settlement as follows:(10)z=−0.08x2+0.93x+0.01y2+1.101y+0.015,where z represents the total settlement value, x is the settlement caused by dewatering, and y is the excavation settlement; the value of R2 after fitting adjustment is 0.999, so the fitted equation can be considered accurate.Figure 11
Fitted curve between the total settlement and settlement caused by dewatering and excavation.
(a)(b)



---

*Source: 8855839-2020-11-10.xml*