# Magnetic Solid-Phase Extraction Using Fe3O4@SiO2 Magnetic Nanoparticles Followed by UV-Vis Spectrometry for Determination of Paraquat in Plasma and Urine Samples

Authors: Ou Sha; Yu Wang; Xin Yin; Xiaobing Chen; Li Chen; Shujun Wang
Journal: Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

A rapid and simple method was optimized and validated for the separation and quantification of paraquat, a frequently used herbicide and a leading cause of fatal poisoning worldwide, at trace levels with UV-Vis spectrophotometry in plasma and urine samples by direct magnetic solid-phase extraction. Fe3O4@SiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) were used as the magnetic solid-phase extraction agents and the paraquat absorbed on NPs was eluted using NaOH and ascorbic acid. Upon optimization, paraquat could be extracted and concentrated from various samples by 35-fold. The linear range, limit of detection (LOD), correlation coefficient (R), and relative standard deviation (RSD) could reach 15.0–400.0 μg/L, 12.2 μg/L, 0.9987, and 0.65% (n=5, c = 40.0 μg/L), respectively. The Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs could be reused up to five times. The method was successfully applied to the determination of paraquat in urine and plasma at different hemoperfusion numbers in a local hospital for the patient of paraquat poisoning. The experiment result could not only enable immediate medical intervention but also benefit patients’ survival.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Paraquat (1,1-dimethyl-4,4-bipyridinium ion, PQ) is a highly effective herbicide, widely used on various crops for the last 60 years in over 130 countries. Although its standard use does not represent a serious poisoning risk to man due to its inactivation by the natural components of the soil, the ingestion of PQ often leads to severe clinical situations [1]. There were about 4000 deaths from paraquat poisoning reported in China between 1991 and 2008 [2], and the occurrence is on the rise. With no known antidote available, treatment of paraquat mostly relies on its removal from patients’ blood by hemoperfusion therapy and forced diuresis [3]. If the PQ concentrations in plasma and urine remain greater than 3 mg/L and 1 mg/L within a 24-hour period, respectively, the probability of patients’ survival is very low [4–6]. Therefore, rapid and accurate detection of PQ level within plasma and urine samples will help physicians to decide on treatment strategies and improves patients’ survival.During the last few decades, a number of analytical methods have been reported for the identification and quantitation of paraquat in biological samples, which includes spectrophotometry [7, 8], gas chromatography (GC) [9], gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) [10, 11], high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [12, 13], high performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) [14], resonance light scattering technique (RLST) [15], voltammetry [16], and derivative spectroscopy [17]. Most of these methods often require expensive devices and professional operators, are associated with high cost, and thus are limited in clinical use. The UV spectrometry method, albeit generally accurate, relatively cheap, and simple to operate, is not well suited for PQ detection mainly due to matrix effects and the low concentration of PQ in biological samples. These drawbacks severely limit the availability of a diagnostic technology for detecting PQ poisoning, especially in remote and poor areas where the occurrence is particularly high. Therefore, developing an effective and inexpensive method for detecting PQ from different biological samples is of urgent importance for lowering fatality from PQ poisoning in clinic.Recently, magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE) is increasingly used for sample preparation, as an adsorbent for the removal and/or preconcentration of many kinds of inorganic or organic pollutants [18, 19]. In MSPE procedures, magnetic adsorbents can be easily magnetized and gathered together in the presence of an external magnetic field and redispersed immediately once the magnetic field is removed, which greatly simplifies the SPE procedure and enhances the extraction efficiency. Most MSPE sorbents contain Fe3O4 nanoparticles (NPs) with modifications on surface chemical functional groups to improve specific binding to the target analytes and thus enable concentrations. Numerous organic and inorganic polymers have been used to modify Fe3O4 NPs [20, 21].In the present study, we proposed, for the first time, to combine Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs solid-phase extraction with UV-Vis for the absorption and determination of PQ in the plasma and urine samples free from any proteins and eluted PQ by sodium hydroxide-ascorbic acid. The free radical, the reduction product of PQ following the elution, is used for quantitative detection of PQ by UV-Vis spectrophotometry. Compared with the other reported methods in literature, the present method requires a simple and fast pretreatment of samples and presented a low limit of detection. The Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs could be reused for five times. This method has been successfully applied to detect PQ in real plasma and urine sample, demonstrating high sensitivity that allows for fast assessment of patient outcome based on routine clinical parameters following the history of paraquat ingestion and thus facilitates the decision on treatment strategies.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Reagents

All reagents were of analytical grade or higher in purity and purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), unless otherwise specified. Milli-Q water (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) was used throughout the study. Britton-Robinson (B-R) buffer solutions were prepared by blending the mixed acid (0.04 mol/L H3PO4, HAc and H3BO3) with 0.2 mol/L NaOH in proportion. PQ was obtained from the Chinese National Institute for the Control of Pharmaceutical and Biological Products (Beijing, China) without further treatment. A 1000 ng/mL of paraquat stock solution was prepared by dissolution of the dichloride salt in water. Working solutions were prepared by dilution of the stock solution with water. Sodium dithionite was unstable in the presence of moisture and kept in a desiccator.


### 2.2. Apparatus

All spectra measurements were carried out using a model UV-2501 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Japan) with matched quartz cells. All pH values were measured by a PHS-25B pH meter (Shanghai Precision & Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). FT-IR spectra were measured with a Bruker Tensor 27 spectrometer (Bruker Company, Germany). Samples were pressed into KBr pellets and recorded at the frequencies from 4000 to 400 cm−1 with a resolution of 4 cm−1.


### 2.3. Preparation of Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs

Fe3O4 NPs were prepared by the conventional coprecipitation method [22]. First, FeCl3 (6.28 g) was dissolved in deionized water (150 mL) followed by addition of polyethylene glycol (30 mL, 20%, w/w) and of (NH4)2Fe(SO4)2 (7.84 g) water solution under stirring. Then ammonium hydroxide (20 mL, 26.5%, w/w) was added rapidly under vigorous stirring. The resultant solution was stirred (1000 r·min−1) at 80°C for 60 min. After cooling to room temperature, the obtained Fe3O4 precipitate was collected by an external magnetic field, washed with deionized water five times, and dried at 60°C for 12 h in vacuum.Fe3O4@SiO2 was prepared according to the literature method [23]. Fe3O4 (1.0 g) were dissolved in 150 mL of ethanol and 30 mL of deionized water by sonication for 15 min, and then 2 mL of ammonium hydroxide and 4 mL of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) were added. The mixture was allowed to react for 6 h at 60°C under continuous stirring. The resultant product was collected by an external magnetic field, rinsed with deionized water and ethanol for six times thoroughly, and dried in vacuum to obtain Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs.


### 2.4. MSPE Procedure

To process a plasma or urine sample, 20.0 mg of Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs was added to a 40 mL polyethylene tube with a cap, and the spiked plasma or urine sample was pipetted into the tube. The tube was vortexed for 10 min for extraction. Then the Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs were gathered and kept static for 1 min with an externally applied Nd-Fe-B permanent magnet. The Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs adsorbent was washed twice under vertexing (30 s/wash) in 1 mL water. Once the suspension became limpid, the supernatant was pipetted out. The isolated Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs were eluted with 0.2 mL of 6.0 mol/L NaOH and 0.8 mL of 50 g/L ascorbic acid to elute the preconcentrated target analytes. The eluted solution was collected and then transferred into a microcell for the detection of target analyte by UV-Vis. The whole time of the process was about 20 min. The general extraction procedure is illustrated in Figure 1.Figure 1
Schematic of the MSPE procedure for detecting PQ using Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs.


### 2.5. Sample Preparation

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Huaihai Institute of Technology (Lianyungang, China). Human plasma and urine samples were obtained from patients of PQ intoxication and healthy adults with no known record of occupational exposure to PQ (as blank) from the First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang (as detailed below). Written consent was signed by all participants. Plasma and urine samples spiked with standard PQ stock solutions to indicate concentrations were used as positive controls. The venous blood was drawn from the forearm of each subject and immediately transferred to vessels containing heparin as an anticoagulant. Plasma was separated by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 10 min and stored at 4°C.Urine samples were collected in accordance with conventional sampling practices using 100 mL clear vials with polytetrafluoroethylene-lined screw caps. The samples were stored at −4°C in a refrigerator.


## 2.1. Reagents

All reagents were of analytical grade or higher in purity and purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), unless otherwise specified. Milli-Q water (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) was used throughout the study. Britton-Robinson (B-R) buffer solutions were prepared by blending the mixed acid (0.04 mol/L H3PO4, HAc and H3BO3) with 0.2 mol/L NaOH in proportion. PQ was obtained from the Chinese National Institute for the Control of Pharmaceutical and Biological Products (Beijing, China) without further treatment. A 1000 ng/mL of paraquat stock solution was prepared by dissolution of the dichloride salt in water. Working solutions were prepared by dilution of the stock solution with water. Sodium dithionite was unstable in the presence of moisture and kept in a desiccator.


## 2.2. Apparatus

All spectra measurements were carried out using a model UV-2501 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Japan) with matched quartz cells. All pH values were measured by a PHS-25B pH meter (Shanghai Precision & Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). FT-IR spectra were measured with a Bruker Tensor 27 spectrometer (Bruker Company, Germany). Samples were pressed into KBr pellets and recorded at the frequencies from 4000 to 400 cm−1 with a resolution of 4 cm−1.


## 2.3. Preparation of Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs

Fe3O4 NPs were prepared by the conventional coprecipitation method [22]. First, FeCl3 (6.28 g) was dissolved in deionized water (150 mL) followed by addition of polyethylene glycol (30 mL, 20%, w/w) and of (NH4)2Fe(SO4)2 (7.84 g) water solution under stirring. Then ammonium hydroxide (20 mL, 26.5%, w/w) was added rapidly under vigorous stirring. The resultant solution was stirred (1000 r·min−1) at 80°C for 60 min. After cooling to room temperature, the obtained Fe3O4 precipitate was collected by an external magnetic field, washed with deionized water five times, and dried at 60°C for 12 h in vacuum.Fe3O4@SiO2 was prepared according to the literature method [23]. Fe3O4 (1.0 g) were dissolved in 150 mL of ethanol and 30 mL of deionized water by sonication for 15 min, and then 2 mL of ammonium hydroxide and 4 mL of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) were added. The mixture was allowed to react for 6 h at 60°C under continuous stirring. The resultant product was collected by an external magnetic field, rinsed with deionized water and ethanol for six times thoroughly, and dried in vacuum to obtain Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs.


## 2.4. MSPE Procedure

To process a plasma or urine sample, 20.0 mg of Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs was added to a 40 mL polyethylene tube with a cap, and the spiked plasma or urine sample was pipetted into the tube. The tube was vortexed for 10 min for extraction. Then the Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs were gathered and kept static for 1 min with an externally applied Nd-Fe-B permanent magnet. The Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs adsorbent was washed twice under vertexing (30 s/wash) in 1 mL water. Once the suspension became limpid, the supernatant was pipetted out. The isolated Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs were eluted with 0.2 mL of 6.0 mol/L NaOH and 0.8 mL of 50 g/L ascorbic acid to elute the preconcentrated target analytes. The eluted solution was collected and then transferred into a microcell for the detection of target analyte by UV-Vis. The whole time of the process was about 20 min. The general extraction procedure is illustrated in Figure 1.Figure 1
Schematic of the MSPE procedure for detecting PQ using Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs.


## 2.5. Sample Preparation

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Huaihai Institute of Technology (Lianyungang, China). Human plasma and urine samples were obtained from patients of PQ intoxication and healthy adults with no known record of occupational exposure to PQ (as blank) from the First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang (as detailed below). Written consent was signed by all participants. Plasma and urine samples spiked with standard PQ stock solutions to indicate concentrations were used as positive controls. The venous blood was drawn from the forearm of each subject and immediately transferred to vessels containing heparin as an anticoagulant. Plasma was separated by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 10 min and stored at 4°C.Urine samples were collected in accordance with conventional sampling practices using 100 mL clear vials with polytetrafluoroethylene-lined screw caps. The samples were stored at −4°C in a refrigerator.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Characterization of the Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs

The Fe3O4 and Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs were characterized using Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy (Figure 2(a)) and magnetic characterization (Figure 2(b)), respectively. As shown in Figure 2(a), the peak at 580 cm−1 in curve (A) was assigned to Fe-O-Fe stretching vibrations and the strong peaks at 1200–1000 cm−1 in curve (B) corresponded to Si-O-H and Si-O-Si stretching vibrations, indicating that SiO2 had been successfully loaded onto the surface of Fe3O4. The magnetic hysteresis loops of the two types of MNPs were shown in Figure 2(b). It is apparent that both of Fe3O4 and Fe3O4@SiO2 showed superparamagnetic properties due to the core magnetite particles. Magnetic characterization using a magnetometer at 25°C indicated that the maximal saturation magnetizations of the Fe3O4 and Fe3O4@SiO2 were 96.3 and 84.7, respectively. Due to their superparamagnetism and large saturation magnetization, Fe3O4@SiO2 could be rapidly separated from the solution using a magnet.Figure 2
FT-IR spectra and magnetic hysteresis loops: (a) FT-IR spectra of Fe3O4 (A) and Fe3O4@SiO2 (B) and (b) magnetic hysteresis loops of Fe3O4 and Fe3O4@SiO2.
(a)
(b)


### 3.2. Optimizations of PQ Extraction

To optimize the extraction procedure of PQ, we focused on the following factors: pH, the amount of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs, temperature, the extraction time, and the sample volume.


#### 3.2.1. pH

pH is a crucial factor affecting the extraction efficiency of PQ (EPQ). In this work, the effect of pH was investigated over the range of 4.0 to 13.0. As shown in Figure 3(a), EPQ% increased with the pH and reached plateau between the pH range of 6.8–12.0. Therefore, pH 7.0 was selected for the subsequent assays.Figure 3
Factors affecting the extraction efficiency. The extraction efficiency (EPQ%) was determined as a function of pH (a), the amount of Fe3O4@SiO2 (b), the extraction time (c), and the sample volume (d).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The spectra of PQ reduced by ascorbic acid before and after the extraction were shown as curve 1 and curve 2, respectively, in Figure3(b). No noticeable differences are found between the two spectral curves. This means that no direct chemical (bonding) interactions were involved between Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs and PQ. The speciation of PQ was not changed after the magnetic solid-phase extraction.


#### 3.2.2. The Amount of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs

To assess the effect of the amount of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs on PQ extraction, we studied the Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs within the range of 5.8 to 32 mg. As shown in Figure 3(b), EPQ% increased in a dose-dependent manner within the amount range of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs between 5.0 mg and 15 mg and kept stable after 15 mg (Figure 3(b)). Therefore 20 mg of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs was selected for further experiments.


#### 3.2.3. The Extraction Time

To evaluate the effect of extraction time onEPQ%, different extraction times ranging from 1 to 17 min were tested (Figure 3(c)). EPQ% gradually increased up to 5 min and remained relatively constant thereafter. Furthermore, the absorbance of PQ in NaOH medium following the reduction by ascorbic acid remained unaltered in response to the extraction time of 5.0–17 min. Thus the extraction time of 10 min was selected for further study.


#### 3.2.4. The Sample Volume

The effect of sample volume was examined between the sample volume of 3.0–70.0 mL that contained a fixed amount of PQ. The data (Figure3(d)) show that EPQ% decreased when the sample volume was greater than 35.0 mL. Therefore, the maximum sample volume could be set as 35.0 mL.


#### 3.2.5. Adsorption Capacity

The adsorption capacity (the maximal amount of extracted analyte from 1.0 g of extractant) is an important parameter to evaluate the efficiency. In this work, the adsorption capacity of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs for PQ was studied by varying the amount of PQ in aqueous samples before the SPE procedure. As shown in Figure 4, the adsorption capacity reached a maximum value when the concentration of PQ (CPQ) was 1.57 μg·mL−1. Given that the amount of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs was set as 20 mg, the maximal adsorption capacity of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs was calculated as approximately 2.4 mg/g for PQ.Figure 4
The adsorption capacity of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs.


### 3.3. Optimization of Desorption

#### 3.3.1. The Selection and the Volume of Eluents

Though PQ could be absorbed by Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs, its reduction product, the blue free radical, could not be absorbed. Utilizing this feature, NaOH and ascorbic acid, which provided the alkaline environment and acted as reductant, respectively, were adopted as eluents in this study. The volume effect of NaOH and ascorbic acid solution on the elution efficiency of PQ was evaluated in detail. The volume of total eluents, including NaOH, ascorbic acid, and water, was fixed at 1.0 mL. The results showed that absorbance was kept stable when the volumes of 6.0 mol/L NaOH and 50 g/L ascorbic acid were higher than 0.16 mL and 0.5 mL, respectively (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)). So 0.2 mL 6 mol/L NaOH and 0.8 mL 50 g/L ascorbic acid were selected. The preconcentration factor (the quotient of volume before absorption and after elution) was 35.Figure 5
The volume effect of NaOH and ascorbic acid.
(a)
(b)


#### 3.3.2. Elution Time

The experimental results showed that the elution efficiency of NaOH and ascorbic acid increased up to 95.0% after 30 s stripping time (Figure6(a)). Thus, 1 min was selected as the optimal elution time.Figure 6
The effect of the elution time and the reusability.
(a)
(b)


#### 3.3.3. Reusability of the Fe3O4@SiO2

After desorption, the Fe3O4@SiO2 was washed for 30 s twice by the mixture solution (1 mL 6.0 mol/L NaOH and 1 ml 50 g/L ascorbic acid) and water, respectively. Then it was dried with heating at 105°C. The extraction efficiency of the recycled Fe3O4@SiO2 for PQ remained above 95.0% after at least five recycles (Figure 6(b)). Thus, the Fe3O4@SiO2 could be used repeatedly for five times.


### 3.4. Tolerance of Contaminants

To assess the tolerance limit of this procedure, we set the detection sensitivity of PQ to 40μg/L. With a relative error of less than ±5%, the tolerance limits for various foreign ions were shown in Table 1 (tolerance ratio in mass). The results indicate that the majority of these contaminants presented no remarkable interference on the determination of PQ.Table 1
Effect of contaminants for detecting 40μg/L PQ.
Contaminants
Tolerance limits
K+, Na+, Zn2+
1000
Chlorophyll, lutein
600
Cd2+, Mg2+, PO43-
500
2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, DDT, Kelthane, lindane
200
Cu2+, Ni2+, Ca2+, Fe2+, Mn2+
100
Al3+
40
Fe3+, Pb2+
20
Aquacide
5
DDT: dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane.


### 3.5. Analytical Performance

Under the optimal conditions, a linear calibration curve was established in the PQ concentration range of 15.0–400.0μg/L. The equation for the calibration graph is A (absorbance) = 0.0049 + 0.0016C (μg/L), with a correlation coefficient of 0.9987. The limit of detection (LOD), defined as LOD = 3σ/k (where σ is the standard deviation of the blank sample and k is the slope of the calibration graph), was 12.2 μg/L. The relative standard deviation was 0.65% (n=5, c = 40.0 μg/L). The preconcentration factor, defined as the quotient of the volumes before the absorption and after the elution, is 35-fold.Table2 offers a comparative analysis of the current method and the previously developed methods. It revealed that the cost of the combining MSPE with UV spectroscopy is relatively cheap for the common instrument and reagent. It is also rapid and easy to operate and has the same sensitivity, as compared to other reported methods.Table 2
Comparison of the MSPE + UV method with other analytical techniques for extraction and determination of PQ.
Sample
Extraction and detection technique
Extract method and extractant
Linear range (μg/L)
Limits of detection (μg/L)
Ref.
Urine
UV-Vis
—
1000–1500
—
[8]
Human blood
UV-Vis
LLE dichloromethane
84.1–841
89.1
[24]
Human blood and urine
GC
—
1 × 103–7 × 104
—
[9]
Plasma and urine
GC-MS
SPEC18 cartridge
100–50000
50
[10]
Urine
GC-MS
HS-SPMEfiber
10–1000
0.1
[11]
Plasma
HPLC-UV
—
2 × 105–5 × 108
—
[12]
Whole blood
HPLC-UV
—
300–30000
26
[25]
Human plasma
HPLC- UV
SPEXtimate C18 column
20–1 × 104
10
[26]
Urine
HPLC-MS
DSPECarbon nanotube
3.75–375.0
0.94
[14]
Plasma and urine
UV-Vis
SPESiO2@Fe3O4
15–400
4.7
This work
HS-SPME: headspace solid phase microextraction; DSPE: dispersive solid phase extraction.To examine the performance of this proposed method, we obtained plasma and urine samples from either PQ patients or healthy controls from the First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang City. In order to assess the accuracy of the proposed method, recovery studies were also performed on the corresponding samples by determining known amounts of PQ added to the samples at above-mentioned concentration levels (Table3). Table 3 shows that the recoveries of the PQ ranged from 92.9% to 105.2%.Table 3
Determination of PQ in different plasma and urine samples (n=3).
Sample
PQ content in sample
Added (μg/L)
Found (μg/L)
Recovery/%
Plasma from healthy adults
ND(3.0 mL plasma)
0
ND
—
40.0
38.5
±
1.7
96.2
80.0
78.1
±
0.8
97.6
Plasma from PQ patients
31.50 ng/mL(3.0 mL plasma)
0
9
.
5
±
0.2
—
5
14
.
6
±
0.9
102.4
10
18
.
8
±
1.4
93.6
Urine from healthy adults
ND(100.0 mL)
0
ND
—
100.0
95.8
±
1.2
95.8
200.0
185.8
±
4.1
92.9
Urine from PQ patients
78.92 ng/mL(50.0 mL)
0
39
.
5
±
1.4
—
20.0
60
.
2
±
3.0
103.5
40.0
77
.
4
±
1.8
94.8
ND, nondetectable.


### 3.6. Clinical Application

This proposed method was applied to the emergency case of paraquat poisoning. A 28-year-old woman was admitted to the local hospital department after intentionally ingesting some of 20% paraquat solution for 60 minutes. Plasma and urine samples were collected before and after the hemoperfusion therapy and tested for the levels of paraquat on admission. The interval time of hemoperfusion was set as 8 hours. The plasma concentrations of paraquat, detected by this proposed method and HPLC method [26], were reduced with the increased number of the hemoperfusion therapies (Table 4). Applying the paired t-test using the comparative method and the proposed method, the calculated t values were smaller than the critical value (2.776, α = 0.05).Table 4
Determination of PQ in plasma and urine sample with different hemoperfusion numbers by the proposed method and HPLC (n=3).
Number of HP
Plasma/(×103 μg/L)
Urine/(×103 μg/L)
The proposed method
HPLC
The proposed method
HPLC
0
6.84 ± 0.04
6.89 ± 0.04
8.54 ± 0.08
8.63 ± 0.07
1
3.32 ± 0.09
3.44 ± 0.10
1.26 ± 0.12
1.42 ± 0.13
2
1.05 ± 0.12
1.19 ± 0.11
0.24 ± 0.05
0.20 ± 0.05
3
0.34 ± 0.09
0.45 ± 0.09
ND
NDThese results demonstrate the applicability of the combining MSPE with UV spectroscopy for the determination of paraquat in human plasma and urine samples.


## 3.1. Characterization of the Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs

The Fe3O4 and Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs were characterized using Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy (Figure 2(a)) and magnetic characterization (Figure 2(b)), respectively. As shown in Figure 2(a), the peak at 580 cm−1 in curve (A) was assigned to Fe-O-Fe stretching vibrations and the strong peaks at 1200–1000 cm−1 in curve (B) corresponded to Si-O-H and Si-O-Si stretching vibrations, indicating that SiO2 had been successfully loaded onto the surface of Fe3O4. The magnetic hysteresis loops of the two types of MNPs were shown in Figure 2(b). It is apparent that both of Fe3O4 and Fe3O4@SiO2 showed superparamagnetic properties due to the core magnetite particles. Magnetic characterization using a magnetometer at 25°C indicated that the maximal saturation magnetizations of the Fe3O4 and Fe3O4@SiO2 were 96.3 and 84.7, respectively. Due to their superparamagnetism and large saturation magnetization, Fe3O4@SiO2 could be rapidly separated from the solution using a magnet.Figure 2
FT-IR spectra and magnetic hysteresis loops: (a) FT-IR spectra of Fe3O4 (A) and Fe3O4@SiO2 (B) and (b) magnetic hysteresis loops of Fe3O4 and Fe3O4@SiO2.
(a)
(b)


## 3.2. Optimizations of PQ Extraction

To optimize the extraction procedure of PQ, we focused on the following factors: pH, the amount of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs, temperature, the extraction time, and the sample volume.


### 3.2.1. pH

pH is a crucial factor affecting the extraction efficiency of PQ (EPQ). In this work, the effect of pH was investigated over the range of 4.0 to 13.0. As shown in Figure 3(a), EPQ% increased with the pH and reached plateau between the pH range of 6.8–12.0. Therefore, pH 7.0 was selected for the subsequent assays.Figure 3
Factors affecting the extraction efficiency. The extraction efficiency (EPQ%) was determined as a function of pH (a), the amount of Fe3O4@SiO2 (b), the extraction time (c), and the sample volume (d).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The spectra of PQ reduced by ascorbic acid before and after the extraction were shown as curve 1 and curve 2, respectively, in Figure3(b). No noticeable differences are found between the two spectral curves. This means that no direct chemical (bonding) interactions were involved between Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs and PQ. The speciation of PQ was not changed after the magnetic solid-phase extraction.


### 3.2.2. The Amount of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs

To assess the effect of the amount of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs on PQ extraction, we studied the Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs within the range of 5.8 to 32 mg. As shown in Figure 3(b), EPQ% increased in a dose-dependent manner within the amount range of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs between 5.0 mg and 15 mg and kept stable after 15 mg (Figure 3(b)). Therefore 20 mg of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs was selected for further experiments.


### 3.2.3. The Extraction Time

To evaluate the effect of extraction time onEPQ%, different extraction times ranging from 1 to 17 min were tested (Figure 3(c)). EPQ% gradually increased up to 5 min and remained relatively constant thereafter. Furthermore, the absorbance of PQ in NaOH medium following the reduction by ascorbic acid remained unaltered in response to the extraction time of 5.0–17 min. Thus the extraction time of 10 min was selected for further study.


### 3.2.4. The Sample Volume

The effect of sample volume was examined between the sample volume of 3.0–70.0 mL that contained a fixed amount of PQ. The data (Figure3(d)) show that EPQ% decreased when the sample volume was greater than 35.0 mL. Therefore, the maximum sample volume could be set as 35.0 mL.


### 3.2.5. Adsorption Capacity

The adsorption capacity (the maximal amount of extracted analyte from 1.0 g of extractant) is an important parameter to evaluate the efficiency. In this work, the adsorption capacity of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs for PQ was studied by varying the amount of PQ in aqueous samples before the SPE procedure. As shown in Figure 4, the adsorption capacity reached a maximum value when the concentration of PQ (CPQ) was 1.57 μg·mL−1. Given that the amount of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs was set as 20 mg, the maximal adsorption capacity of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs was calculated as approximately 2.4 mg/g for PQ.Figure 4
The adsorption capacity of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs.


## 3.2.1. pH

pH is a crucial factor affecting the extraction efficiency of PQ (EPQ). In this work, the effect of pH was investigated over the range of 4.0 to 13.0. As shown in Figure 3(a), EPQ% increased with the pH and reached plateau between the pH range of 6.8–12.0. Therefore, pH 7.0 was selected for the subsequent assays.Figure 3
Factors affecting the extraction efficiency. The extraction efficiency (EPQ%) was determined as a function of pH (a), the amount of Fe3O4@SiO2 (b), the extraction time (c), and the sample volume (d).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The spectra of PQ reduced by ascorbic acid before and after the extraction were shown as curve 1 and curve 2, respectively, in Figure3(b). No noticeable differences are found between the two spectral curves. This means that no direct chemical (bonding) interactions were involved between Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs and PQ. The speciation of PQ was not changed after the magnetic solid-phase extraction.


## 3.2.2. The Amount of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs

To assess the effect of the amount of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs on PQ extraction, we studied the Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs within the range of 5.8 to 32 mg. As shown in Figure 3(b), EPQ% increased in a dose-dependent manner within the amount range of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs between 5.0 mg and 15 mg and kept stable after 15 mg (Figure 3(b)). Therefore 20 mg of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs was selected for further experiments.


## 3.2.3. The Extraction Time

To evaluate the effect of extraction time onEPQ%, different extraction times ranging from 1 to 17 min were tested (Figure 3(c)). EPQ% gradually increased up to 5 min and remained relatively constant thereafter. Furthermore, the absorbance of PQ in NaOH medium following the reduction by ascorbic acid remained unaltered in response to the extraction time of 5.0–17 min. Thus the extraction time of 10 min was selected for further study.


## 3.2.4. The Sample Volume

The effect of sample volume was examined between the sample volume of 3.0–70.0 mL that contained a fixed amount of PQ. The data (Figure3(d)) show that EPQ% decreased when the sample volume was greater than 35.0 mL. Therefore, the maximum sample volume could be set as 35.0 mL.


## 3.2.5. Adsorption Capacity

The adsorption capacity (the maximal amount of extracted analyte from 1.0 g of extractant) is an important parameter to evaluate the efficiency. In this work, the adsorption capacity of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs for PQ was studied by varying the amount of PQ in aqueous samples before the SPE procedure. As shown in Figure 4, the adsorption capacity reached a maximum value when the concentration of PQ (CPQ) was 1.57 μg·mL−1. Given that the amount of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs was set as 20 mg, the maximal adsorption capacity of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs was calculated as approximately 2.4 mg/g for PQ.Figure 4
The adsorption capacity of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs.


## 3.3. Optimization of Desorption

### 3.3.1. The Selection and the Volume of Eluents

Though PQ could be absorbed by Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs, its reduction product, the blue free radical, could not be absorbed. Utilizing this feature, NaOH and ascorbic acid, which provided the alkaline environment and acted as reductant, respectively, were adopted as eluents in this study. The volume effect of NaOH and ascorbic acid solution on the elution efficiency of PQ was evaluated in detail. The volume of total eluents, including NaOH, ascorbic acid, and water, was fixed at 1.0 mL. The results showed that absorbance was kept stable when the volumes of 6.0 mol/L NaOH and 50 g/L ascorbic acid were higher than 0.16 mL and 0.5 mL, respectively (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)). So 0.2 mL 6 mol/L NaOH and 0.8 mL 50 g/L ascorbic acid were selected. The preconcentration factor (the quotient of volume before absorption and after elution) was 35.Figure 5
The volume effect of NaOH and ascorbic acid.
(a)
(b)


### 3.3.2. Elution Time

The experimental results showed that the elution efficiency of NaOH and ascorbic acid increased up to 95.0% after 30 s stripping time (Figure6(a)). Thus, 1 min was selected as the optimal elution time.Figure 6
The effect of the elution time and the reusability.
(a)
(b)


### 3.3.3. Reusability of the Fe3O4@SiO2

After desorption, the Fe3O4@SiO2 was washed for 30 s twice by the mixture solution (1 mL 6.0 mol/L NaOH and 1 ml 50 g/L ascorbic acid) and water, respectively. Then it was dried with heating at 105°C. The extraction efficiency of the recycled Fe3O4@SiO2 for PQ remained above 95.0% after at least five recycles (Figure 6(b)). Thus, the Fe3O4@SiO2 could be used repeatedly for five times.


## 3.3.1. The Selection and the Volume of Eluents

Though PQ could be absorbed by Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs, its reduction product, the blue free radical, could not be absorbed. Utilizing this feature, NaOH and ascorbic acid, which provided the alkaline environment and acted as reductant, respectively, were adopted as eluents in this study. The volume effect of NaOH and ascorbic acid solution on the elution efficiency of PQ was evaluated in detail. The volume of total eluents, including NaOH, ascorbic acid, and water, was fixed at 1.0 mL. The results showed that absorbance was kept stable when the volumes of 6.0 mol/L NaOH and 50 g/L ascorbic acid were higher than 0.16 mL and 0.5 mL, respectively (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)). So 0.2 mL 6 mol/L NaOH and 0.8 mL 50 g/L ascorbic acid were selected. The preconcentration factor (the quotient of volume before absorption and after elution) was 35.Figure 5
The volume effect of NaOH and ascorbic acid.
(a)
(b)


## 3.3.2. Elution Time

The experimental results showed that the elution efficiency of NaOH and ascorbic acid increased up to 95.0% after 30 s stripping time (Figure6(a)). Thus, 1 min was selected as the optimal elution time.Figure 6
The effect of the elution time and the reusability.
(a)
(b)


## 3.3.3. Reusability of the Fe3O4@SiO2

After desorption, the Fe3O4@SiO2 was washed for 30 s twice by the mixture solution (1 mL 6.0 mol/L NaOH and 1 ml 50 g/L ascorbic acid) and water, respectively. Then it was dried with heating at 105°C. The extraction efficiency of the recycled Fe3O4@SiO2 for PQ remained above 95.0% after at least five recycles (Figure 6(b)). Thus, the Fe3O4@SiO2 could be used repeatedly for five times.


## 3.4. Tolerance of Contaminants

To assess the tolerance limit of this procedure, we set the detection sensitivity of PQ to 40μg/L. With a relative error of less than ±5%, the tolerance limits for various foreign ions were shown in Table 1 (tolerance ratio in mass). The results indicate that the majority of these contaminants presented no remarkable interference on the determination of PQ.Table 1
Effect of contaminants for detecting 40μg/L PQ.
Contaminants
Tolerance limits
K+, Na+, Zn2+
1000
Chlorophyll, lutein
600
Cd2+, Mg2+, PO43-
500
2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, DDT, Kelthane, lindane
200
Cu2+, Ni2+, Ca2+, Fe2+, Mn2+
100
Al3+
40
Fe3+, Pb2+
20
Aquacide
5
DDT: dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane.


## 3.5. Analytical Performance

Under the optimal conditions, a linear calibration curve was established in the PQ concentration range of 15.0–400.0μg/L. The equation for the calibration graph is A (absorbance) = 0.0049 + 0.0016C (μg/L), with a correlation coefficient of 0.9987. The limit of detection (LOD), defined as LOD = 3σ/k (where σ is the standard deviation of the blank sample and k is the slope of the calibration graph), was 12.2 μg/L. The relative standard deviation was 0.65% (n=5, c = 40.0 μg/L). The preconcentration factor, defined as the quotient of the volumes before the absorption and after the elution, is 35-fold.Table2 offers a comparative analysis of the current method and the previously developed methods. It revealed that the cost of the combining MSPE with UV spectroscopy is relatively cheap for the common instrument and reagent. It is also rapid and easy to operate and has the same sensitivity, as compared to other reported methods.Table 2
Comparison of the MSPE + UV method with other analytical techniques for extraction and determination of PQ.
Sample
Extraction and detection technique
Extract method and extractant
Linear range (μg/L)
Limits of detection (μg/L)
Ref.
Urine
UV-Vis
—
1000–1500
—
[8]
Human blood
UV-Vis
LLE dichloromethane
84.1–841
89.1
[24]
Human blood and urine
GC
—
1 × 103–7 × 104
—
[9]
Plasma and urine
GC-MS
SPEC18 cartridge
100–50000
50
[10]
Urine
GC-MS
HS-SPMEfiber
10–1000
0.1
[11]
Plasma
HPLC-UV
—
2 × 105–5 × 108
—
[12]
Whole blood
HPLC-UV
—
300–30000
26
[25]
Human plasma
HPLC- UV
SPEXtimate C18 column
20–1 × 104
10
[26]
Urine
HPLC-MS
DSPECarbon nanotube
3.75–375.0
0.94
[14]
Plasma and urine
UV-Vis
SPESiO2@Fe3O4
15–400
4.7
This work
HS-SPME: headspace solid phase microextraction; DSPE: dispersive solid phase extraction.To examine the performance of this proposed method, we obtained plasma and urine samples from either PQ patients or healthy controls from the First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang City. In order to assess the accuracy of the proposed method, recovery studies were also performed on the corresponding samples by determining known amounts of PQ added to the samples at above-mentioned concentration levels (Table3). Table 3 shows that the recoveries of the PQ ranged from 92.9% to 105.2%.Table 3
Determination of PQ in different plasma and urine samples (n=3).
Sample
PQ content in sample
Added (μg/L)
Found (μg/L)
Recovery/%
Plasma from healthy adults
ND(3.0 mL plasma)
0
ND
—
40.0
38.5
±
1.7
96.2
80.0
78.1
±
0.8
97.6
Plasma from PQ patients
31.50 ng/mL(3.0 mL plasma)
0
9
.
5
±
0.2
—
5
14
.
6
±
0.9
102.4
10
18
.
8
±
1.4
93.6
Urine from healthy adults
ND(100.0 mL)
0
ND
—
100.0
95.8
±
1.2
95.8
200.0
185.8
±
4.1
92.9
Urine from PQ patients
78.92 ng/mL(50.0 mL)
0
39
.
5
±
1.4
—
20.0
60
.
2
±
3.0
103.5
40.0
77
.
4
±
1.8
94.8
ND, nondetectable.


## 3.6. Clinical Application

This proposed method was applied to the emergency case of paraquat poisoning. A 28-year-old woman was admitted to the local hospital department after intentionally ingesting some of 20% paraquat solution for 60 minutes. Plasma and urine samples were collected before and after the hemoperfusion therapy and tested for the levels of paraquat on admission. The interval time of hemoperfusion was set as 8 hours. The plasma concentrations of paraquat, detected by this proposed method and HPLC method [26], were reduced with the increased number of the hemoperfusion therapies (Table 4). Applying the paired t-test using the comparative method and the proposed method, the calculated t values were smaller than the critical value (2.776, α = 0.05).Table 4
Determination of PQ in plasma and urine sample with different hemoperfusion numbers by the proposed method and HPLC (n=3).
Number of HP
Plasma/(×103 μg/L)
Urine/(×103 μg/L)
The proposed method
HPLC
The proposed method
HPLC
0
6.84 ± 0.04
6.89 ± 0.04
8.54 ± 0.08
8.63 ± 0.07
1
3.32 ± 0.09
3.44 ± 0.10
1.26 ± 0.12
1.42 ± 0.13
2
1.05 ± 0.12
1.19 ± 0.11
0.24 ± 0.05
0.20 ± 0.05
3
0.34 ± 0.09
0.45 ± 0.09
ND
NDThese results demonstrate the applicability of the combining MSPE with UV spectroscopy for the determination of paraquat in human plasma and urine samples.


## 4. Conclusion

Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs were successfully prepared and applied as magnetic adsorbents to preconcentrate and separate PQ. Featuring the rapid collection of Fe3O4@SiO2 MNPs from the sample using an external magnetic field, easy elution with more environmental solvent, excellent enrichment in low time, and good precision and high accuracy, this extraction procedure proved to be a useful and convenient method for quantitative evaluation of paraquat in biological samples. Compared with other reported methods, this technique is simple, inexpensive, and fast. Through this study, the optimal conditions for PQ detection are established and validated using the plasma and urine samples from human patients suffering PQ poisoning and from healthy adults through the recovery experiment. The results indicated that the developed MSPE-UV-Vis method is suitable for detecting PQ poisoning in clinic. Early detection and quantification of PQ will no doubt benefit patient treatment and survival. We are investigating the application potential of this novel method in clinical studies and evaluating its significance on improving patient outcomes.



---

*Source: 8704639-2017-07-17.xml*