# Elliptical Ring Antenna Excited by Circular Disc Monopole for UWB Communications

Authors: Krittaya Nakprasit; Arnon Sakonkanapong; Chuwong Phongcharoenpanich
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

This research proposes a compact elliptical ring antenna excited by a circular disc monopole (CDM) for ultra-wideband (UWB) communications. In the study, time- and frequency-domain pulse distortions of the antenna in the transmission mode were characterized by magnitude and phase of the antenna transfer function (Hrad). The results showed that the gain and magnitude of Hrad in the boresight direction are sufficiently flat with linear phase response. The average antenna gain is 3.9 dBi over the UWB spectrum. The antenna also exhibits low pulse distortion with the correlation factors (ρ) of 0.98 and 0.93 for the fifth-order derivative Gaussian pulse and modulated Gaussian pulse with 6 GHz band rejection. The CDM-excited elliptical ring antenna possesses several attractive features, including wide bandwidth, flat gain, compactness, low cost, and low distortion.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Ultra-wideband (UWB) is a radio technology with a spectrum that occupies a fractional bandwidth greater than 20 percent of the center frequency, or a bandwidth of at least 500 MHz when the center frequency is higher than 6 GHz. UWB emits less than −41.3 dBm/MHz within the 3.1–10.6 GHz operating band. There are two UWB signal implementation schemes: impulse UWB (I-UWB) using the full spectrum of a single band for low-data-rate applications and multicarrier UWB (MC-UWB) using multiple sub-bands with a bandwidth larger than 500 MHz in combination with orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) modulation for high-data-rate applications [1, 2]. The advantages of I-UWB include low complexity, low power consumption, and good time-domain resolution, allowing for location and tracking applications. I-UWB has also been incorporated in IEEE 802.15.4a standard for a low-rate wireless personal area network (LR-WPAN).In impulse radio-based ultra-wideband communication, minimum impulse signal distortion is imperative because UWB antennas transmit very short pulses on the order of nanosecond in duration without carrier and occupies a very large bandwidth of 7.5 GHz. Therefore, UWB antennas should possess a clean impulse response (constant magnitude and linear phase) where the radiating signal is a time derivative of the input signal [2]. Most UWB antennas have an omnidirectional radiation pattern for applications in mobile devices.Antennas with planar monopoles protruding from a perpendicular ground plane have been proposed in [3–9]. The antenna with a consistent monopole-like radiation characteristic was proposed [3]. The bandwidth is extremely larger than conventional monopole whip antenna. Next, the monocone antenna with a dielectric loading and a monocone quasi-Yagi antenna was subsequently investigated [4, 5]. The very wideband operation could be achieved with a reasonable gain. In [6, 7], the UWB antennas with a reflector were presented for high gain and steerable beam purpose. The UWB patch antenna with a top loading was also designed for the WBAN system [8]. In [9], the UWB monopole-like radiation characteristic was introduced for high isolation between transmit and receive ports. Despite low profile structure, these antennas lack a compact size because of its extended ground plane structure. To obtain a more compact structure, the modified biconical antenna [10] and the coplanar waveguide (CPW)-feeding antennas [11–14] have been reported for some specific applications. In addition, the printed antennas with different structures in both sides had been realized for bandwidth enhancement size miniaturizations [15–19]. The main advantage of these antennas is that the flat structure could be readily integrated into electronic circuits. However, they suffer from bulkiness because of the presence of the planar ground plane.This study proposes an elliptical ring antenna excited by a circular disc monopole (CDM) for radiation over the UWB spectrum. The antenna is compact and consists of a simple feeder and low-cost components. In the antenna development, simulations were carried out using CST Studio Suite [20], and a prototype antenna was fabricated. To validate the antenna performance, time- and frequency-domain pulse distortions in the transmission mode in terms of magnitude and phase of the antenna transfer function (Hrad) were characterized by manipulating the angular positions. The fifth-order derivative Gaussian pulse and modulated Gaussian pulse with 6 GHz band rejection were used as the exciting signals in the simulation. The correlation factors between input and radiated pulses were also determined.


## 2. Antenna Design and Parametric Study

Figure1 illustrates the proposed antenna, consisting of an elliptical ring and a CDM, where a, b, d, and l are the semimajor axis, semiminor axis, thickness, and length of the elliptical ring, respectively; and c and t are the radius and thickness of the CDM, respectively, with a feeding gap of h between the elliptical ring and the CDM. The CDM radiates omnidirectionally with wideband characteristics, and the elliptical ring transforms the omnidirectional into bidirectional radiation pattern. A hole was centrally drilled at the base of the elliptical ring, whose radius is identical to the dielectric radius of an SMA connector to connect the antenna to the connector.Figure 1
Schematic of the elliptical ring antenna excited by the circular disc monopole.To overcome bulkiness, the feeding gap (h), the CDM thickness (t), and the ring length (l) were 1 mm. Based on the length of quarter-wave monopole operating at 3 GHz, the initial CDM diameter was 25 mm (c = 12.5 mm).Initially, the simulation was carried out using a circular ring, wherea = b. The feeding gap (h) was optimized to prevent electrical short circuit. As a result, h was 1 mm and the radius of the circular ring was 14 mm. The parameters of the circular ring antenna are tabulated in Table 1. However, these parameters failed to achieve |S11| < −10 dB across the UWB spectrum, as shown in Figure 2. In the figure, with the circular ring, the impedance matching (|S11|) was achieved slightly above 7 GHz and again 10.66 GHz, failing to cover the entire UWB spectrum. As shown in Figure 2, to cover the UWB spectrum with the circular ring, a large ground plane of 100 mm × 100 mm was required. To achieve size compactness, the large ground plane is undesirable. The CDM-excited elliptical ring is proposed to accomplish UWB operation without using a large ground plane. The radius of CDM (c) and the dimension of elliptical ring axes (a and b) are varied to cover the UWB frequency range.Table 1
Parameters of CDM-excited circular and elliptical ring antennas.
Parameters
Initial size (mm) (circular ring)
Refined size (mm) (elliptical ring)
Semimajor axis of the elliptical ring (a)
14.0
13.0
Semiminor axis of the elliptical ring (b)
14.0
11.0
Ring length (l)
1.0
1.0
Thickness of the elliptical ring (d)
1.0
1.0
Radius of CDM (c)
12.5
6.5
Thickness of CDM (t)
1.0
1.0
Feeding gap (h)
1.0
1.0
Spacing between the elliptical ring and CDM (s)
2.0
8.0Figure 2
Simulated |S11| of CDM with the circular ring and with the ground plane.To realize the size compactness with UWB characteristics, the parameters were individually varied and simulated |S11| determined. Figure 3 shows the simulated |S11| under varying a (11–15 mm), given the other antenna refined parameters remaining constant.Figure 3
Simulated |S11| under variable a of 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 mm, given the other parameters remaining constant.Figures4–8 illustrate the simulated |S11| under varying b, l, d, t, and h, respectively, given the other parameters remaining unchanged (Table 1). The results validate the elliptical ring antenna parameters.Figure 4
Simulated |S11| under varying b of 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 mm.Figure 5
Simulated |S11| under varying l of 1, 2, and 3 mm.Figure 6
Simulated |S11| under varying d of 1, 3, and 5 mm.Figure 7
Simulated |S11| under varying t of 1, 3, and 5 mm.Figure 8
Simulated |S11| under varying h of 1, 2, and 3 mm.


## 3. Antenna Characteristics

A prototype antenna was fabricated according to the elliptical ring antenna refined parameters in Table1. Figures 9(a)–9(b) show the prototype antenna and the coordinate system. In Figure 10, the simulated and measured results showed that the bandwidth of the antenna covered the entire UWB spectrum. Instead of using the CDM with the ground plane size 100  mm × 100  mm, the proposed antenna using the CDM-excited elliptical ring can also cover UWB with a compact size. The discrepancy could be attributed to the coupling effects of the connecting cable.Figure 9
Prototype antenna and the coordinate system of the antenna. (a) Prototype antenna. (b) Coordinate system.
(a)
(b)Figure 10
|S11| versus frequency of the antenna.Ideally, the antenna gain is flat under the distortionless condition [21]. Figure 11 shows the simulated gain in the boresight direction, varying between 3.1 and 4.8 dBi (<3 dBi), indicating flat gain. The average simulated gain is 3.9 dBi along the UWB spectrum. Because the proposed antenna contained no dielectric materials, it achieved very high radiation efficiency (almost 100%) along the UWB spectrum.Figure 11
Gain and radiation efficiency versus frequency of the antenna.The CDM-excited elliptical ring antenna radiated bidirectionally over 3.1–10.6 GHz. The measurement setup for the radiation pattern are shown in Figure12. The standard horn antenna ETS model 3115 is used as the transmitting antenna, and the antenna under test (AUT) is used as the receiving antenna. The distance between the antennas are maximized for closed to uniform plane wave. The position of the AUT is located by line-of-sight alignment. The radiation pattern measured results at a frequency of 3.1 GHz, 6.8 GHz, and 10.6 GHz were carried out by E- and H-planes. The comparison between simulated and measured radiation patterns are shown in Figures 13(a)–13(c). Table 2 presents the main beam direction and half-power beamwidth (HPBW) of the antenna. A plus sign indicates that the main beam is tilting upward from z to + y axis, and a minus sign indicates that the main beam is tilting downward in the direction of −y axis.Figure 12
Radiation pattern measurement setup in the anechoic chamber.Figure 13
Radiation patterns of the antenna. (a) Antenna geometry (b) 3.1 GHz. (c) 6.8 GHz. (d) 10.6 GHz.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Table 2
Radiation characteristics of the CDM-excited elliptical ring antenna.
Frequency (GHz)
Main beam direction in E-plane (deg)
Main beam direction in H-plane (deg)
HPBW in E-plane (deg)
HPBW in H-plane (deg)
3
−4
0
84
149
4
−6
0
80
177
5
−8
0
76
178
6
−12
0
68
128
7
+4
0
68
98
8
+10
0
59
103
9
+12
0
53
117
10
+16
0
53
121
11
+24
0
53
77The main beam direction is influenced by the induced electric fields from various antenna components. Figure14 shows the contour with color map and excitation levels of electric fields on the z-plane (5 mm) at the boresight of the antenna aperture. From 3.1 GHz to 6.8 GHz, the induced electric fields in the direction perpendicular to the z axis (between the top of the CDM and the top of the ring) continually increased, resulting in a downward tilted main beam (Figure 14(a)). At 6.8 GHz (the center frequency), the electric fields mostly radiated without induced electromagnetic fields at the top and bottom of the elliptical ring, as shown in Figure 14(b). Therefore, the main beam was in the boresight direction. At 10.6 GHz, stronger induced electric fields near the feeding point and the connector were observed in the direction perpendicular to the z axis, resulting in an upward tilted main beam (Figure 14(c)). The main beam in E-plane was tilted upward as the frequency increased from 6.8 GHz to 10.6 GHz. The boresight direction, however, remained in the HPBW region, resulting in bidirectional radiation over the UWB spectrum. The cross polarization is also very low in the boresight direction.Figure 14
Electric fields near the antenna aperture. (a) 3.1 GHz. (b) 6.8 GHz. (c) 10.6 GHz.
(a)
(b)
(c)Table3 provides a comparison between the performance of this antenna with the current state of the art in UWB antennas. These antennas were designed to meet the application requirements with a very wideband frequency range and desirable radiation characteristics. Furthermore, the low profile and size compactness are important features for actual applications.Table 3
Comparison of the performance of the proposed antenna with the current state of the art in UWB antennas.
Reference
Electrical size
Frequency range (GHz)
Fractional bandwidth (%)
Gain (dBi)
[3]
0.27λL × 0.27λL × 0.040λL
0.66–5.60
157.83
4.0–8.0
[4]
4.68λL × 4.68λL × 0.214λL
2.41–7.98
107.22
1.0–2.5
[5]
1.86λL × 3.1λL × 0.072λL
6.20–18.00
97.52
3.2–10.1
[6]
0.88λL × 0.88λL × 0.216λL
2.20–6.50
98.85
7.0–10.0
[7]
0.98λL × 0.98λL × 0.383λL
1.66–11.00
147.55
8.7–18.9
[8]
0.67λL × 0.67λL × 0.050λL
2.50–24.00
162.26
3.5–10.0
[9]
0.35λL × 0.35λL × 0.242λL
0.58–1.75
100.43
3.6–5.5
[10]
0.29λL × 0.29λL × 0.270λL
1.50–41.00
185.88
1.2–4.7
[11]
0.42λL × 0.42λL × 0.013λL
2.50–12.0
131.03
2.0–6.0
[12]
0.21λL × 0.29λL × 0.004λL
3.10–10.60
109.49
-1.0–3.0
[13]
0.21λL × 0.25λL × 0.013λL
2.38–11.80
132.86
2.8–5.6
[14]
0.19λL × 0.27λL × 0.002λL
2.85–11.85
122.45
−1.2–3.2
[15]
0.47λL × 0.53λL × 0.004λL
3.10–10.60
109.49
2.0–5.5
[16]
0.28λL × 0.30λL × 0.015λL
2.80–12.00
124.32
4.0–5.0
[17]
0.24λL × 0.36λL × 0.015λL
2.90–10.80
115.33
1.00–4.25
[18]
0.46λL × 0.43λL × 0.019λL
3.50–11.70
107.89
4.33–6.00
[19]
1.10λL × 1.20λL × 0.005λL
2.99–10.00
107.93
2.6–6.0
Proposed antenna
0.23λL × 0.27λL × 0.010λL
3.10–12.00
117.88
3.1–4.8
λ
L: the free-space wavelength corresponding to the lowest operating frequency of the antenna.The antennas with a flat ground plane or reflector are low profile at the expense of a large planar dimension [3–9]. The modified biconical antenna [10] without a flat ground plane can overcome the bulky ground plane. However, the antenna volume is relatively huge. The patch antennas using a printed circuit board (PCB) [11–19] that can accommodate the radiator and ground plane within the single structure such as coplanar waveguide (CPW), strip line, and partial ground plane can reduce the overall antenna size with the suffered gain limitation. Apparently, the antenna presented in this work is compact with a very wide impedance bandwidth and efficient gain.


## 4. Antenna Performance for UWB Communications

The performance of the UWB antenna could be assessed by pulse distortion attributable to the effect of the propagation path. In this research, the magnitude and phase of the antenna transfer function (Hrad) were characterized at different angular positions of a receiving probe in E-plane and H-plane. The angular position (θ) and probe direction (+ and −) along E-plane and H-plane were illustrated in Figure 9(b).Figure15 shows the simulated magnitude and phase of Hrad in the boresight direction, given an antenna/probe propagation distance of 9.7 cm (in the far-field region). |Hrad| was normalized to remove the effect of the propagation distance. The normalized |Hrad| is sufficiently flat with 1.9 dB variation over the UWB spectrum. The phase of Hrad is of linear phase response, independent of propagation distance and time as the cycles of phase variation are proportionate to distance and time. Figures 16–18 illustrate |Hrad| at various angular positions in E-plane and H-plane.Figure 15
Simulated |Hrad| of the antenna in the boresight direction.Figure 16
Simulated |Hrad| of the antenna at various positions on H-plane in the right or left direction.Figure 17
Simulated |Hrad| of the antenna at various positions on E-plane in the upward direction.Figure 18
Simulated |Hrad| of the antenna at various positions on E-plane in the downward direction.The E-plane of the antenna is nonsymmetrical, so the plus and minus signs are used to indicate the direction. Meanwhile, the H-plane is symmetrical. The flat magnitude and linear phase were observed over the UWB spectrum in the boresight direction but deteriorated outside the boresight direction.In Figure16, the pulse distortion in H-plane evidently increased beyond 6 GHz and became more pronounced with larger angles. This could be attributed to the fact that beyond 6 GHz, the electric fields in the area between the CDM and the elliptical ring were induced.In Figure17, the pulse distortion in E-plane in the upward direction was observed around 6 GHz and became less severe afterward. The phenomenon could be attributed to the induction of electric fields in the area between the top of the CDM and the elliptical ring. In Figure 18, the pulse distortion in E-plane in the downward direction became worse beyond 6.5 GHz as the electric fields in the area between the feeding point and the connector were induced.The 5th-order derivative Gaussian pulse [22] and modulated Gaussian pulse with 6 GHz band rejection [23] were used to assess the transmitting performance of the UWB antenna. From the FCC-EIRP-aware UWB pulse generator (PG) design approach in [24], it is evident that a 5th-derivative Gaussian PG has a very short UWB pulse width that is required in PG design. The 5th-order Gaussian pulse is the best fit for IR-UWB. In addition, based on the actual implementation using the foundry 0.18 μm CMOS process [25], the 5th-order Gaussian pulse is ideal for IR-UWB impulse signals.The simulation was carried out by positioning the probe 3 meters away from the transmitting antenna. The electric fields received by the probe were measured in the boresight direction. In general, variations in the propagation distance affect the signal amplitude and time delay. However, since the amplitude was normalized, the propagation distance could be ignored. Figures19(a) and 19(b) illustrate the input pulses in the time domain and the normalized electric fields for the fifth-order derivative Gaussian pulse and modulated Gaussian pulses with 6 GHz band rejection, with the corresponding correlation factors (ρ) tabulated in Table 4. The small discrepancies between the input and radiated pulses correspond to the simulated |Hrad| in the boresight direction (Figure 15).Figure 19
Waveforms of the input pulse superimposed on the radiated pulse. (a) Signals of the fifth-order derivative Gaussian pulse. (b) Signals of the modulated Gaussian pulse with 6 GHz band rejection.
(a)
(b)Table 4
Correlation factors (ρ) between the amplitudes of input and radiated signals.
Pulse types
ρ
Fifth-order derivative Gaussian pulse
0.98
Modulated Gaussian pulse with 6 GHz band rejection
0.93


## 5. Conclusions

This study proposes an elliptical ring antenna excited by a circular disc monopole. The proposed antenna could achieve ultra-wideband and bidirectional radiation characteristics in the 3.1–10.6 GHz frequency range. The antenna gain and |Hrad| are sufficiently flat with linear phase response over the UWB spectrum. In addition, the correlation factors (ρ) between the input and radiated pulses for the fifth-order derivative Gaussian pulse and modulated Gaussian pulse with 6 GHz band rejection are 0.98 and 0.93, respectively. The CDM-excited elliptical ring antenna possesses several attractive characteristics, including economy, compactness, and ease of fabrication with a gain of 3.9 dBi. The antenna is suitable for UWB communications.



---

*Source: 8707182-2020-02-17.xml*