# Small Size and Low Cost UHF RFID Tag Antenna Mountable on Metallic Objects

Authors: Sergio López-Soriano; Josep Parrón
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

Reducing tag size while maintaining good performance is one of the major challenges in radio-frequency identification applications (RFID), in particular when labeling metallic objects. In this contribution, a small size and low cost tag antenna for identifying metal objects in the European UHF band (865–868 MHz) is presented. The antenna consists of a transmission line mounted on an inexpensive thin dielectric which is proximity-coupled to a short-ended patch mounted on FR4 substrate. The overall dimensions of the tag are 33.5 × 30 × 3.1 mm. Experimental results show that, for an EIRP of 3.2 W (European regulations), such a small and cheap tag attains read ranges of about 5 m when attached to a metallic object.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

To date, research efforts in the design of UHF RFID tag antennas have been directed toward the following issues: (i) reducing the overall size, (ii) lowering the fabrication costs, and (iii) achieving the specifications of a particular application. In particular, metal-mountable tags have the challenge of achieving read ranges of a few meters with small size and low cost [1].In the literature, we find several solutions for metal-mountable applications: antennas integrating EBG structures [2], antennas using high permittivity materials [3–5], and antennas based on microstrip patch concepts [6–10]. From the viewpoint of cost and manufacturing complexity, this latter group provides the best solution since such designs frequently make use of low cost FR4 dielectric substrate (εr1=4.2, tan⁡δ=0.02, and thickness of 3 mm) [6–9]. The area and read range of typical tags are summarized in Table 1.Table 1
Size and read range for different metal tags that can be found in literature (EIRP: 4 W).
Reference
Area (mm2)
Read range (m)
[6]
32 × 18
1.5
[7]
53 × 20
2.5
[8]
55 × 22
4.7
[9]
68 × 30
9.5As might be expected, there is a tradeoff between the area occupied and the read range. We can also see that tags occupying similar area may produce very different read ranges. Therefore, the antenna configuration can make a difference in the tag performance.In this paper we propose an antenna configuration that comprises a fixed part that determines the behavior of the antenna in terms of radiation and a variable part that can be used to easily match the antenna to the wide variety of integrated circuits (ICs) that can be found in the market. We will show how this configuration can be implemented with low cost materials, resulting in a tag of small size and good performance when placed on metal surfaces.


## 2. Antenna Design

The proposed antenna is illustrated in Figure1. The patch, which is mounted on FR4 substrate, is designed to operate in a given band and can remain unchanged for different ICs. It has been short-ended in order to reduce the size [11]. Moreover, a slot has been cut in the patch with a view to obtain additional size reduction.Figure 1
Antenna geometry.The patch is proximity-coupled to a transmission line which is mounted on an inexpensive thin dielectric. Adjusting the dimensions of the transmission line will slightly modify the input impedance of the antenna, thus making it possible to match it to a particular IC impedance.The parameters involved in the design are illustrated in Figure2. A thickness of 3 mm (h1) has been selected for the patch substrate for comparison purposes. Regarding the transmission line, it consists of a copper strip which is separated from the patch by a standard paper sheet of thickness 100 μm (εr2=3.85 and tan⁡δ=0.08 [7]).Figure 2
Antenna geometric parameters (top and front view).The tag has been designed over an infinite ground plane using the simulation software FEKO [12]. The antenna is matched to work with the Alien Higgs-3 integrated circuit [13] (30-j211 Ω at 867 MHz). Therefore, to obtain the maximum power transfer between the antenna and the IC complex conjugate impedance matching is required. Table 2 summarizes the final dimensions of the tag.Table 2
Prototype dimensions (in mm).
L
L
p
L
tl
L
s
1
L
s
2
g
W
W
tl
W
s
h
1
h
2
33.5
30.5
33.5
1
1
3
30
1
28
3.1
0.1


## 3. Parametric Study

In order to justify the election of the final dimensions of the prototype a study on the effects of the main design parameters has been conducted with FEKO to provide a better understanding of the antenna operation. The values in Table2 will be used as reference dimensions for all simulations. All gain results are given for the z-axis direction.


### 3.1. Radiating Patch

The length of the patch (Lp) controls the resonant frequency of the antenna that roughly corresponds to a quarter of the effective wavelength (Figure 3). It is tuned to provide the inductance that compensates the chip capacitance at the operation frequency. As previously commented, a slot is cut on the patch thereby increasing its electrical length. This effect is illustrated in Figure 4.Figure 3
Antenna input impedance for different lengths of the patch.Figure 4
Antenna input impedance for different widths of the slot.The gap (g), the width (W), and the substrate thickness (h1) also affect the input impedance of the antenna but we use them to optimize the antenna gain since they also determine the size of the radiating slot of the patch. Figure 5 shows that the thickness is the most relevant parameter for the gain whereas a fine tuning of the gap size (Figure 6) and the width (Figure 7) can provide additional dBs of improvement.Figure 5
Antenna gain for different thicknesses of the patch.Figure 6
Antenna gain for different sizes of the gap.Figure 7
Antenna gain for different widths of the patch.


### 3.2. Feeding Transmission Line

Once the patch has been adjusted to achieve the maximum gain in the desired band, the designer can use the width (Wtl), length (Ltl), and thickness (h2) of the transmission line to match the reactance of different integrated circuits without modifying significantly the gain. Figure 8 shows the range of variation that can be achieved in the input impedance by changing the length whereas Figure 9 shows that the thickness controls the coupling between the transmission line and the patch and provides an extra parameter to match the antenna to the IC.Figure 8
Antenna input impedance for different lengths of the transmission line.Figure 9
Antenna input impedance for different thicknesses of the transmission line.


## 3.1. Radiating Patch

The length of the patch (Lp) controls the resonant frequency of the antenna that roughly corresponds to a quarter of the effective wavelength (Figure 3). It is tuned to provide the inductance that compensates the chip capacitance at the operation frequency. As previously commented, a slot is cut on the patch thereby increasing its electrical length. This effect is illustrated in Figure 4.Figure 3
Antenna input impedance for different lengths of the patch.Figure 4
Antenna input impedance for different widths of the slot.The gap (g), the width (W), and the substrate thickness (h1) also affect the input impedance of the antenna but we use them to optimize the antenna gain since they also determine the size of the radiating slot of the patch. Figure 5 shows that the thickness is the most relevant parameter for the gain whereas a fine tuning of the gap size (Figure 6) and the width (Figure 7) can provide additional dBs of improvement.Figure 5
Antenna gain for different thicknesses of the patch.Figure 6
Antenna gain for different sizes of the gap.Figure 7
Antenna gain for different widths of the patch.


## 3.2. Feeding Transmission Line

Once the patch has been adjusted to achieve the maximum gain in the desired band, the designer can use the width (Wtl), length (Ltl), and thickness (h2) of the transmission line to match the reactance of different integrated circuits without modifying significantly the gain. Figure 8 shows the range of variation that can be achieved in the input impedance by changing the length whereas Figure 9 shows that the thickness controls the coupling between the transmission line and the patch and provides an extra parameter to match the antenna to the IC.Figure 8
Antenna input impedance for different lengths of the transmission line.Figure 9
Antenna input impedance for different thicknesses of the transmission line.


## 4. Simulation and Experimental Results

The fabricated prototype is shown in Figure10. The IC is easily soldered over the copper strip.Figure 10
Fabricated prototype.The impedance measurements are conducted over a ground plane of 1 × 1 m2. The measurement setup is shown in Figure 11. The setup is calibrated at the end of the SMA coaxial cable, and then, an electrical delay of 1.46 ns is added in order to take into account the effect of the MMCX cable, which was previously characterized.Figure 11
Impedance measurement setup.Measurements have proven to be repeatable. The measured and simulated input impedance are compared in Figure12. Despite the slight displacement of the measured reactance, both results are in good agreement.Figure 12
Simulated (blue) and measured (green) antenna’s input impedance and IC’s impedance (red).Figure13 depicts the simulated radiation pattern of the prototype antenna over a 20 × 20 cm2 metal plate. As expected, it is similar to a slot oriented along the y-axis in a finite ground plane. The maximum gain is −6 dB in the +z direction.Figure 13
Simulated radiation pattern for a 20 × 20 cm2 metal plate.The read range measurements have been carried out using the Impinj Speedway Revolution R220 reader [14] and the antenna S8658P from Laird Technologies [15]. The measurement setup is shown in Figure 14.Figure 14
Read range measurement setup.Although the EIRP for the European standard is 3.2 W, the EIRP was set up to be 4 W (American standard) in order to compare with Table1. Measurements show that our prototype, placed on top of a 20 × 20 cm2 metal plate, achieves a read range of 5.6 m; therefore, it improves substantially the read range of some low cost tags that occupy approximately the same area.The Voyantic Tagformance equipment [16] has also been used to evaluate the read range of our tag with respect to frequency. In this case, the tag has been placed over a metallic box of 15 × 8 × 6 cm2. This box modifies slightly the tag performance with respect to 20 × 20 cm2 metal plate, since the gain is about 1 dB smaller and the peak of read range is shifted toward upper frequencies (Figure 15).Figure 15
Voyantic read range measurement.


## 5. Conclusions

The RFID tag presented in this paper is highly suitable for identification of metallic objects and is based on a transmission line that is proximity-coupled to a short-ended patch. The parametric study carried out shows that the radiating patch can be optimized to achieve the maximum gain in the desired band while the feeding transmission line can be easily tuned to match different integrated circuits.The proposed tag has been made of inexpensive materials with a simple and repeatable procedure and has dimensions of 33.5 × 30 × 3.1 mm. The read range of the tag has proven to be significantly better than other solutions that can be found in literature with approximately the same area [7, 8].



---

*Source: 870478-2015-10-28.xml*