# Broadband Transmission and Statistical Performance Properties of Overhead High-Voltage Transmission Networks

Authors: Athanasios G. Lazaropoulos
Journal: Journal of Computer Networks and Communications
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

This paper considers broadband signal transmission and statistical performance properties of high-voltage/broadband over power lines (HV/BPL) channels associated with overhead power transmission. The overhead HV/BPL transmission channel is investigated with regard to its spectral behavior, its end-to-end signal attenuation, and its statistical performance metrics. It is found that the above features depend critically on the frequency, the overhead HV power grid type (150 kV, 275 kV, or 400 kV and single- or double-circuit), the coupling scheme applied, the physical properties of the cables used, the MTL configuration, and the type of branches existing along the end-to-end BPL signal propagation. The contribution of this paper is threefold. First, the significant broadband transmission potential of overhead HV lines is revealed. The results demonstrate that, regardless of overhead HV power grid type, the overhead HV grid is a potentially excellent communications medium, offering low-loss characteristics, flat-fading features, and low multipath dispersion over a 25 km repeater span well beyond 100 MHz. Second, regarding the statistical properties of various overhead HV/BPL transmission channels, two fundamental correlations of several wireline systems, for example, coaxial cables and xDSL, are also validated in the case of overhead HV/BPL transmission channels, namely, (i) end-to-end channel attenuation in relation with root-mean-square delay spread (RMS-DS) and (ii) coherence bandwidth (CB) in relation with RMS-DS. Third, fitting the numerical results and other field trial measurements, two regression distributions suitable for each fundamental correlation are proposed.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The ubiquitous presence of the low-voltage (LV), medium-voltage (MV), and high-voltage (HV) power grids is the key to developing an advanced smart grid (SG) power network, offering a plethora of potential SG applications, such as ubiquitous grid surveillance at small cost, continuous monitoring, real-time adjustment of sensitive loads, and optimal response to power demand during critical circumstances [1, 2]. Moreover, the deployment of broadband over power lines (BPL) networks through the entire grid forms a potentially convenient and inexpensive communication medium for delivering broadband last mile access in remote and/or underdeveloped areas [3].With the goal of providing operational telephone services and data communications across large geographical distances, the first power line communications (PLC) efforts were put in place by power utilities over HV power grid in the early 1920s [4, 5]. Due to the upcoming SG adaption both in transmission and distribution power networks, the availability of a reliable communication network on the HV power grid side is important for the support of these significant changes [6–9]. Since overhead HV power lines are generally the lowest-cost method of transmission for large quantities of electric power, utilities employ primarily overhead HV transmission power grid for new urban, suburban, and rural installations [9–13].The modeling problem for overhead HV/BPL channels, which consists of investigating the characteristics of power network as a communication medium, is a difficult challenge because reliable high-speed communication is sought over a medium designed for electrical energy delivery rather than for data transmission. When considered as a transmission medium for communications signals, the overhead HV power grid is subjected to attenuation, multipath due to various reflections, noise, and electromagnetic interference (EMI) [14–21]. Each of the aforementioned adverse factors affects critically the overall performance and the design of BPL systems [22, 23].Due to the evolution of broadband SG requirements, the development of accurate channel models at high frequencies along the HV transmission power lines is imperative. As usually done in BPL transmission, a hybrid model is employed to examine the behavior of BPL transmission channels installed on BPL multiconductor transmission line (MTL) structures [14, 15, 24–31]. This hybrid model follows (i) a bottom-up approach consisting of an appropriate combination of similarity transformations and MTL theory to determine the propagation constant and the characteristic impedance of the modes supported [24–37] and (ii) a top-down approach based on cascaded matrices of two-port network modules—the T-matrix (TM) method—to determine the end-to-end attenuation of BPL channel connections [10, 15, 16, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 34, 37, 38]. The influence of factors, such as the overhead HV power grid type (150 kV, 275 kV, or 400 kV and single- or double-circuit), the coupling scheme applied, the physical properties of the cables used, the MTL configuration, the end-to-end distance, and the number and the electrical length encountered along the end-to-end HV/BPL signal propagation, is investigated based on numerical results concerning simulated overhead HV/BPL topologies.Taking into account the overhead HV/BPL simulation results, the statistical properties of HV/BPL channels can be studied. The common nature among HV/BPL, MV/BPL, and LV/BPL systems is reflected on important statistical performance metrics, such as the average end-to-end channel attenuation, the root-mean-square delay spread (RMS-DS), and the coherence bandwidth (CB). Specifically, it is confirmed that (i) average end-to-end channel attenuation and RMS-DS in overhead HV/BPL channels are positively correlated lognormal random variables being in agreement with relevant sets of measurements and relevant distributions of recently proposed statistical BPL channel models [39–47]. On the basis of the confirmed correlation, a new approximation—UNI1 approach—suitable for the design of BPL transmission and distribution power grids is proposed; (ii) CB and RMS-DS correlation behavior in overhead HV/BPL can be described by hyperbolic functions. By fitting the simulation results, a new approximation—UNI2 approach—is proposed appropriate for overhead HV/BPL systems which is compared with recently proposed statistical distributions for various BPL systems and for different CB correlation levels [44–48]. The commonality of the above mentioned correlations in several wireline communications channels is also confirmed in overhead HV/BPL transmission case.The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section2, the modal and the coupling scheme spectral behaviors of overhead HV/BPL broadband propagation are discussed along with the necessary assumptions concerning BPL transmission. Section 3 provides a description of the statistical performance metrics considered in the rest of the paper. In Section 4, numerical results are provided, aiming at marking out how the various features of the overhead HV transmission power grids influence BPL transmission and statistical performance metrics. On the basis of the confirmed fundamental correlations between channel attenuation/RMS-DS and CB/RMS-DS, new regression approximations are proposed. Section 5 concludes the paper.


## 2. The Physical BPL Layer

The overhead HV power grid differs considerably from transmission via twisted-pair, coaxial, or fiber-optic cables due to the significant differences of the network structure and the physical properties of the power cables used [1, 10, 16, 19, 24, 26, 27, 38].Overhead HV transmission grid accommodates the transfer of hundreds or thousands MW of electric power in long distances (hundreds or thousands km) from the generators to HV/MV substations. These substations define the boundaries between transmission and distribution power grid sides. Overhead HV power transmission systems are mainly classified in the electrical power industry by (i) their voltage levels (from 150 kV up to 1 MV) and (ii) their number of MTL circuits per tower (mainly, either single- or double-circuit). In the case of single-circuit three-phase overhead HV systems, each tower supports three-phase conductors whereas in the case of double-circuit three-phase overhead HV systems, each tower supports six-phase conductors, and they are classified by (iii) the number of neutral conductors per tower [52].A typical case of 150 kV single-circuit overhead HV transmission line is depicted in Figure1(a). Three parallel phase conductors spaced by Δp150kV in the range from 6.60 m to 8.95 m are suspended at heights hp150kV ranging from 19 m to 19.95 m above lossy ground—conductors 1, 2, and 3. Moreover, two parallel neutral conductors spaced by Δn150kV in the range from 9.30 m to 12.10 m hang at heights hn150kV ranging from 23.75 m to 24.7 m—conductors 4 and 5. This three-phase five-conductor (n150kV=5) overhead HV distribution line configuration is considered in the present work consisting of ACSR GROSBEK 3×374.77mm2+2×322.26mm2 conductors [13, 49–51].Typical overhead HV multiconductor structures [13, 24, 49–51]. (a) 150 kV single-circuit. (b) 275 kV double-circuit. (c) 400 kV double-circuit.
(a)(b)(c)A typical case of overhead 275 kV double-circuit overhead HV transmission line is illustrated in Figure1(b). Two sets of three-phase conductors—conductors 1, 2, 3 and conductors 4, 5, 6—are spaced by Δp1275kV in the range from 8.84 m to 13.1 m. The three-phase conductors of each set with radii rp275kV=12.08 mm are suspended one above the other spaced by Δp2275kV ranging from 3.66 m to 5.18 m and located at heights hp275kV in the range from 18.9 m to 20.48 m above ground for the lowest conductor. Apart from the six-phase conductors of two sets, the upper conductor—conductor 7—is the neutral conductor with radii rn275kV=7.11 mm, spaced by Δn275kV ranging from 2.4 m to 3.08 m from the highest phase conductor—conductor 3 or 6, and, consequently, hangs at heights hn275kV in the range from 28.62 m to 33.92 m above ground. This double-circuit seven-conductor (n275kV=7) overhead HV distribution line configuration is considered in the present work consisting of ACSR conductors [13, 49–51, 53, 54].Overhead 400 kV double-circuit overhead HV transmission phase lines with radiirp400kV=15.3 mm hang at typical heights hp400kV equal to 20 m above ground —conductors 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. These six-phase conductors are divided into three bundles; the phase conductors of each bundle are connected by nonconducting spacers and are separated by Δp1400kV equal to 400 mm, whereas bundles are spaced by Δp2400kV equal to 10 m. Moreover, two parallel neutral conductors with radii rn400kV=9 mm spaced by Δn400kV equal to 12 m hang at heights hn400kV equal to 23.7 m—conductors 7 and 8. This double-circuit eight-conductor (n400kV=8) overhead HV distribution line configuration is considered in the present work consisting of ACSR conductors—see Figure 1(c) [13, 49–52].The ground is considered as the reference conductor. The conductivity of the ground is assumedσg=5mS/m and its relative permittivity εrg=13, which is a realistic scenario [1, 14, 24, 26, 27, 38]. The impact of imperfect ground on signal propagation via overhead power lines was analyzed in [14, 26, 27, 38, 55–58]. This formulation has the advantage that, contrary to other available models for overhead power lines [59–62], it is suitable for transmission at high frequencies above lossy ground and for broadband applications of overhead HV/BPL, MV/BPL, and LV/BPL systems.Through a matrix approach, the standard TL analysis can be extended to the MTL case which involves more than two conductors. Compared to a two-conductor line supporting one forward- and one backward-traveling wave, an MTL structure withn+1 conductors parallel to the z axis as depicted in Figures 1(a), 1(b), and 1(c) may support n pairs of forward- and backward-traveling waves with corresponding propagation constants. These waves may be described by a coupled set of 2n first-order partial differential equations relating the line voltages Vi(z,t), i=1,…,n to the line currents Ii(z,t), i=1,…,n. Each pair of forward- and backward-traveling waves is referred to as a mode [24, 26, 32, 33].Consequently, in the case of overhead HV transmission lines involvingn conductors over lossy plane ground, n modes may be supported, namely, as follows [1, 2, 9, 12, 13, 24, 26–29, 32–35, 38, 49, 55–58, 63, 64].(i)
Common mode (CM,i=1) of overhead HV/BPL transmission which propagates via the n conductors and returns via the ground. γCM constitutes the CM propagation constant.(ii)
Differential modes (DMi-1, i=2,…,n) of overhead HV/BPL transmission which propagate and return via the n conductors. γDMi-1, i=2,…,n constitute the propagation constants of DMi−1,i=2,…,n, respectively.The attenuation coefficientsαCM=Re{γCM} and αDMi-1=Re{γDMi-1}, i=2,…,n of the CM and the n-1 DMs, respectively, are evaluated using the method presented in [9, 12–14, 24, 26, 27, 38, 49, 55–58, 64] and are plotted versus frequency in Figures 2(a), 2(c), and 2(e) for the configurations depicted in Figures 1(a), 1(b), and 1(c), respectively. The phase delays βCM=Im{γCM} and βDMi-1=Im{γDMi-1}, i=2,…,n of the CM and the n-1DMs, respectively, [9, 12–14, 24, 26, 27, 38, 49, 55–58, 64] are also plotted versus frequency in Figures 2(b), 2(d), and 2(f) for the same three configurations, respectively.Frequency spectra of typical overhead HV multiconductor structures (the subchannel frequency spacing is equal to 0.1 MHz). (a, b) Attenuation coefficients and phase delays of 150 kV single-circuit, respectively. (c, d) Attenuation coefficients and phase delays of 275 kV double-circuit, respectively. (e, f) Attenuation coefficients and phase delays of 400 kV double-circuit, respectively.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)The above modes excited—each with its own propagation characteristics—may be examined separately across the overall overhead HV transmission network, under the following three assumptions [14, 24, 26–28, 31, 36].(A1)
Cables with identical eigenmodes are used throughout the network. The branches and termination points are perfectly balanced ensuring that there is no mode mixing anywhere in the network.(A2)
The branching cables are identical to the distribution cables, and the mode propagation constants of all the cable segments are assumed to be the same.(A3)
The termination points behave independently of frequency since they are either ideal matches—achieved using adaptive modal impedance matching [65, 66]—or open circuit terminations.The three assumptions were already made in the analysis of LV/BPL and MV/BPL transmission [14, 15, 26–28, 31, 36]. Because of the above assumptions, the n modes supported by the overhead HV/BPL configurations are completely separate giving rise to n independent transmission channels which simultaneously carry BPL signals. This complete mode separation through the entire overhead HV/BPL transmission network has also been encountered in overhead MV/BPL and LV/BPL transmission where three and four modes, respectively, exist [14, 15, 24, 26, 27].As it has already been presented in [13, 14, 24, 26, 64], the modal voltages Vm(z)=[V1m(z)⋯Vnm(z)]T and the modal currents Im(z)=[I1m(z)⋯Inm(z)]T may be related to the respective line quantities V(z)=[V1(z)⋯Vn(z)]T and I(z)=[I1(z)⋯In(z)]T via the similarity transformations [24, 26, 28, 32, 33]:(1)V(z)=TV⋅Vm(z),(2)I(z)=TI⋅Im(z),
where [·]T denotes the transpose of a matrix, TV and TI are n×n matrices depending on the frequency, the overhead HV power grid type, the geometry of the MTL configuration, and the physical properties of the cables [9, 12, 13, 24, 26, 28, 32, 33, 49, 64]. Through the aforementioned equations, the line voltages and currents are expressed as appropriate superpositions of the respective modal quantities. From (1),(3)Vm(0)=TV-1⋅V(0).The TM method—based on the scattering matrix formalism [15, 26, 37] and presented analytically in [15]—models the spectral relationship between Vim(z), i=1,…,n and Vim(0), i=1,…,n proposing operators Him{·}, i=1,…,n so that(4)Vm(z)=Hm{Vm(0)},
where
(5)Hm{⋅}=diag⁡{H1m{⋅}⋯Hnm{⋅}}
is a diagonal matrix operator whose elements Him{·}, i=1,…,n are the modal transfer functions [14, 24, 26]. Combining (1) and (5), the n×n matrix channel transfer function H{·} relating V(z) with V(0) through(6)V(z)=H{V(0)}
is determined from
(7)H{⋅}=TV⋅Hm{⋅}⋅TV-1.
Based on (5), the n×n matrix transfer function H{·} of the overhead HV/BPL transmission network is determined [14, 15, 24, 26, 29, 63].According to how signals are injected onto overhead HV/BPL transmission lines, two different coupling schemes exist [24].(i)
The first one iswire-to-wire (WtW) when the signal is injected between two conductors; say between conductors p andq≠p,p,q=1,…,n. For the WtW coupling configurations, the relative excitation voltage relationship which is applied to the n conductors at z=0 is given by
(8)V(0)=VWtW(0)⋅CWtW,
where VWtW(0) is the source equivalent Thévenin dipole voltage and CWtW is the n×1 WtW coupling column vector with zero elements except in rows p and q where the values are equal to 0.5 and −0.5, respectively [38]. Following the same procedure, the load equivalent Thévenin dipole voltage VWtW(z) is given from
(9)VWtW(z)=[CWtW]T⋅V(z).
Combining (6), (7), (8), and (9), the coupling WtW transfer function HWtW{·} is determined by
(10)HWtW{⋅}=[CWtW]T⋅TV⋅Hm{⋅}⋅TV-1⋅CWtW.
WtW coupling between conductors p and q will be detoned as WtWp-q, hereafter.(ii)
The second iswire-to-ground (WtG) when the signal is injected onto one conductor and returns via the ground; say between conductor s,s=1,…,n and the ground. Similar expressions with (10) may be derived in WtG coupling configurations. The coupling WtG transfer function HWtG{·} is given from
(11)HWtG{⋅}=[CWtG]T⋅TV⋅Hm{⋅}⋅TV-1⋅CWtG,
where CWtG is the n×1 WtG coupling column vector with zero elements except in row s where the value is equal to 1 [38]. WtG coupling between conductor s and ground will be detoned as WtGs, hereafter.When WtW injection is done, the DMs are mainly excited, whereas the primary excitation of the CM is generated due to the lack of symmetry of the MTL configuration; hence, BPL transmission is accomplished mostly via the DMs. When WtG injection is applied, both the CM and DMs are excited [1, 14, 15, 24, 26, 27, 38, 56].


## 3. Statistical Performance Metrics of Overhead HV/BPL Channels

Based on the end-to-end transfer functionsH{·} of BPL transmission channels—either modal or coupling scheme transfer functions—several useful metrics are reported concerning the statistical properties of the respective overhead HV/BPL channels, namely, as follows.(a) The Discrete Impulse Response
Once the end-to-end transfer function is known, discrete impulse responsehp=h(t=pTs), p=0,…,J-1 is obtained as the power of two J-point inverse discrete Fourier transform (IDFT) of the discrete end-to-end transfer function:
(12)Hq={|Hq|ejφq,q=0,…,K-10,q=K,…,J-1}={H(f=qfs),q=0,…,K-10,q=K,…,J-1},
where Fs=1/Ts is the sampling rate, fs is the flat-fading subchannel frequency spacing, K≤J/2 is the number of subchannels in the BPL signal frequency range of interest, and |Hq| and ϕq are the amplitude response and the phase response of the discrete end-to-end transfer function, respectively [39–41].(b) The Average End-to-End Channel Gain and Attenuation
As the BPL channel is frequency selective, the average end-to-end channel gain can be calculated by averaging over frequency:(13)|H|2¯=∑p=0J-1|hp|2=1J∑q=0J-1|Hq|2,
where |H|2¯ is the average end-to-end channel gain. The lognormality (normality) of the average end-to-end channel gain may be justified by the multipath nature of BPL signal propagation and the TL modeling using on cascaded two-port network modules [39–45]. In this paper, similar expression is derived in the case of average end-to-end channel attenuation A by simply substituting |H|2¯ with 1/|A̅| in (13).(c) The RMS-DS
It is a measure of the multipath richness of a BPL channel. The RMS-DS is determined from [39–45]
(14)στ=Tsμ0(2)-(μ0)2,
where
(15)μ0=∑p=0J-1p|hp|2∑p=0J-1|hp|2,μ0(2)=∑p=0J-1p2|hp|2∑p=0J-1|hp|2.(d) The CB
It is the range of frequencies over which the normalized autocorrelation function of the end-to-end transfer function is over a certain CB correlation levelX (usually set to 0.9, 0.7, or 0.5), that is, a bandwidth in which the subchannels can be approximately considered flat fading. As the phase response of the end-to-end transfer function may be assumed as uniformly distributed over [0,2π], the CB can be determined from [46, 47]
(16)Bc(Δf)=E{Hq⋅[H(f=qfs+Δf)]*}E{|Hq|2},q=0,1,…,⌊(J-2)+Δffs⌋,
where Δf is the frequency shift, [·]* denotes the complex conjugate of an element, and ⌊x⌋ is the largest integer not greater than x. From (16), CBX is that value of Δf such that Bc(Δf)=X.


## 4. Numerical Results and Discussion

The simulations of various overhead HV/BPL transmission channels aim at investigating in the frequency band 1–100 MHz: (a) their broadband transmission characteristics and how these are affected by the overhead grid topology features and (b) their inherent statistical properties. As mentioned in Section2, since the modes supported by the overhead HV/BPL configurations may be examined separately, it is assumed for simplicity that the BPL signal is injected directly into the modes [14, 15, 24, 26–30, 33–36, 38]; thus, the complicated modal analysis of [32, 33], briefly described in Section 2, is avoided.As it concerns the system specifications, the sampling rate and flat-fading subchannel frequency spacing are assumedFs=200MHz and fs=0.2MHz, respectively. Thus, the number of subchannels K in the BPL signal frequency range of interest and the J-point IDFT are assumed equal to 496 and 1024, respectively.For the numerical computations, the 150 kV single-circuit, the 275 kV double-circuit, and the 400 kV double-circuit overhead HV transmission line configurations, depicted in Figures1(a), 1(b), and 1(c), respectively, have been considered. As previously mentioned, the modes supported by the overhead HV/BPL cable configuration may be examined separately.


### 4.1. Factors Influencing Overhead HV/BPL Transmission

The following discussion will focus on the transmission characteristics related to (i) the CM and the DMs of the aforementioned overhead HV/BPL configurations and (ii) the WtW and the WtG coupling schemes related to these overhead HV/BPL systems as well.The simple overhead HV/BPL topology of Figure3, having N branches, has been considered. With reference to Figure 3, the transmitting and the receiving ends are assumed matched to the characteristic impedance of the mode considered, whereas the branch terminations Zbk, k=1,…,N are assumed open circuit [2, 13–15, 24, 26, 27, 49, 50, 64].Figure 3
End-to-end HV/BPL connection withN branches and a network module [15, 26].Today, thousands of km of overhead HV lines are installed in more than 120 countries. These lines stretch from approximately 25 km to 190 km from the generation points before reaching any population centers. Shorter branches in the range of 10 km to 50 km are used in order to connect overhead HV transmission lines either between them or with HV/MV substations [2, 13, 25, 49, 50, 64, 67, 68].To compare the modal channels with the coupling scheme channels, a relatively dense overhead HV/BPL network of path length up to 25 km is assumed. The following representative overhead HV/BPL topology has been examined—see Figure3.(1)
The “LOS” transmission along the average end-to-end distanceL=L1+⋯+LN+1=25 km when no branches are encountered. This topology corresponds to line-of-sight transmission in wireless channels.In Figures4(a), 4(c), and 4(e), the end-to-end channel attenuation from A to B is plotted versus frequency for the “LOS” transmission case for the propagation of CM and DMi-1, i=2,…,n for the overhead HV/BPL configurations of Figures 1(a), 1(b), and 1(c), respectively. In Figure 4(b), among the possible n·(n-1) WtW and n WtG configurations, the end-to-end coupling channel attenuation from A to B for the “LOS” transmission case is plotted versus frequency in the case of overhead HV/BPL configuration of Figure 1(a) for the coupling schemes WtW1-2, WtW2-1, WtW1-3, WtW5-2, WtG1, and WtG4. In Figures 4(d) and 4(f), similar curves are plotted in the case of overhead HV/BPL configuration of Figure 1(b)—coupling schemes WtW1-2, WtW1-4, WtW4-1, WtW7-3, WtG1, and WtG7—and Figure 1(c)—coupling schemes WtW1-2, WtW1-4, WtW4-1, WtW8-3, WtG1, and WtG7—, respectively.End-to-end channel attenuation versus frequency for “LOS” transmission case, (for plot clarity reasons, the subchannel frequency spacing is equal to 1 MHz). (a, b) Modal and coupling scheme analysis of 150 kV single-circuit, respectively. (c, d) Modal and coupling scheme analysis of 275 kV double-circuit, respectively. (e, f) Modal and coupling scheme analysis of 400 kV double-circuit, respectively.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)From Figures4(a), 4(b), 4(c), 4(d), 4(e), and 4(f), several interesting remarks may be highlighted.(i)
The common modes between the three overhead HV/BPL configurations examined—CM and DMi−1, i=2,3,4,5—are characterized by relevant spectral behaviors—see Figures 4(a), 4(c), and 4(e). This inherent modal similarity of overhead HV/BPL systems is reflected on similar plots regarding spectral behavior of WtW and WtG coupling schemes—see Figures 4(b), 4(d), and 4(f).(ii)
As it has already been mentioned, it is confirmed that WtW coupling schemes are primarily affected by the propagation of DMs, whereas WtG coupling schemes are influenced mostly by CM.(iii)
ObservingWtW1-2 andWtW2-1 curve plots from Figure 4(b) and WtW1-4 andWtW4-1 curve plots from Figures 4(d) and 4(f), it is clearly shown that the isotropy that characterizes other MV/BPL and LV/BPL channels—presented in [25, 31, 49, 64, 67]—is also validated in overhead HV/BPL systems.(iv)
Although WtG coupling schemes present better average attenuation characteristics in comparison with WtW coupling schemes, two important factors that should be taken under consideration for appropriately evaluating HV/BPL coupling systems are (i) the significant EMI of WtG coupling schemes to other already licensed wireless communications [3, 69, 70] and (ii) the spectral notches that are observed in the end-to-end channel attenuation of WtG coupling schemes due to CMs. Therefore, an interesting tradeoff between EMI protection, frequency selective behavior, and channel capacity occurs during the suitable coupling scheme selection [14, 15, 47].(v)
The “LOS” transmission channels present low-loss characteristics at frequencies ranging from 1 MHz to 100 MHz over a 25 km repeater span regardless of the overhead HV power grid type considered. The fact that overhead HV/BPL lines resemble a low-loss transmission system shows as an attractive broadband last mile solution [13–15, 24, 26–28, 34, 38, 50].As it has been shown, the overhead HV/BPL “LOS” configurations tend to present attenuation characteristics comparable to the fiber-optic ones. Practically, this favorable attenuation behavior still exists in real overhead HV topologies. With reference to Figure3, four indicative overhead HV topologies concerning end-to-end connections of average lengths equal to 25 km are examined. These topologies, which are common for 150 kV single-circuit, 275 kV double-circuit, and 400 kV double-circuit overhead HV/BPL systems, are the “LOS” transmission topology referred to above and in [2, 13, 49, 50, 64, 67, 68]:(2)
a typical urban topology (urban case) withN=3 branches (L1=1.15 km, L2=12.125 km,L3=8.425 km,L4=3.3 km, Lb1=27.6 km, Lb2=17.2 km, Lb3=33.1 km),(3)
a typical suburban topology (suburban case) withN=2 branches (L1=9.025 km, L2=12.75 km, L3=3.225 km,Lb1=46.8 km, Lb2=13.4 km),(4)
a typical rural topology (rural case) with onlyN=1 branch (L1=3.75 km, L2=21.25 km, Lb1=21.1 km).As usually done to simplify the analysis and due to relatively comparable results among modal and coupling scheme channels—as it concerns the end-to-end channel attenuation of the “LOS” transmission case from Figures4(a), 4(b), 4(c), 4(d), 4(e), and 4(f)—[5, 6, 14–16, 24, 27, 38, 71], only one mode—say DM4—and only one coupling scheme—say WtW1−2—for the modal and coupling scheme analysis, respectively, of each overhead HV/BPL system configuration of Figures 1(a), 1(b), and 1(c) will be examined, hereafter. This assumption does not affect the generality of the analysis concerning the transmission characteristics of the examined overhead HV/BPL topologies in the range from 1 MHz to 100 MHz, provides a representative picture of the real-world overhead HV/BPL network situation, and is adopted for the sake of terseness and simplicity.In Figures5(a) and 5(b), the end-to-end channel attenuation from A to B of overhead HV/BPL configuration of Figure 1(a) is plotted with respect to frequency for the aforementioned four indicative topologies for the propagation of DM4 and WtW1−2, respectively. Similar plots are also plotted in Figures 5(c) and 5(d) in the case of overhead HV/BPL configuration of Figure 1(b) and in Figures 5(e) and 5(f) in the case of overhead HV/BPL configuration of Figure 1(c).End-to-end channel attenuation versus frequency for urban case, suburban case, rural case, and “LOS” transmission case when open circuit branch terminations are assumed (for plot clarity reasons, the subchannel frequency spacing is equal to 1 MHz). (a, b) Modal—DM4—and coupling scheme—WtW1−2—analysis of 150 kV single-circuit, respectively. (c, d) Modal—DM4—and coupling scheme—WtW1−2—analysis of 275 kV double-circuit, respectively. (e, f) Modal—DM4—and coupling scheme—WtW1−2—analysis of 400 kV double-circuit, respectively.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)According to the picture obtained from their spectral behavior—see Figures5(a), 5(b), 5(c), 5(d), 5(e), and 5(f), the overhead HV/BPL topologies may be classified into three major channel classes regardless of the overhead HV/BPL channel type examined—either modal or coupling scheme channel—(see also [14, 15, 24, 71] for other MV/BPL and LV/BPL channels)(1)
The firt one is“LOS” channels, when no branches are encountered, and, consequently, no spectral notches are observed. This case corresponds to the best possible overhead HV/BPL transmission conditions, encountered when long-distance transmission occurs.(2)
The second isgood channels, when the number of branches is small and their electrical length is large. Shallow spectral notches are observed. Overhead HV/BPL transmission primarily near rural and suburban areas belongs to this channel class.(3)
The third isbad channels, when the number of branches is large and their electrical length is small. Deep spectral notches are observed. Overhead HV/BPL transmission near urban areas belongs to this channel class.Thus, the spectral behavior of the above overhead HV/BPL channel classes affects critically the transmission characteristics of overhead HV/BPL channels [10, 14, 15, 22, 24, 26, 72–74].


### 4.2. On the Statistical Relationship between Performance Metrics in Overhead HV/BPL Transmission

Based on the statistical performance metrics presented in Section4, a physically meaningful statistical characterization of the BPL channels is obtained permitting important properties of the overhead HV/BPL systems to be revealed. Tables 1, 2, and 3 summarize the metrics of average end-to-end channel attenuation, RMS-DS, and CB0.5, respectively, for the propagation of DM4 and WtW1−2 for 150 kV single-circuit, 275 kV double-circuit, and 400 kV double-circuit overhead HV/BPL configurations for each of the aforementioned four indicative HV/BPL topologies.Table 1
Average end-to-end channel attenuation for various overhead HV/BPL configurations and topologies.
Average end-to-end channel attenuation (dB)150 kV275 kV400 kVDM4WtW1−2DM4WtW1−2DM4WtW1−2Urban case21.8232.4120.0626.7323.2529.48Suburban case19.3029.9116.8623.4719.8426.37Rural case16.0826.3613.6520.2316.4323.14“LOS” case12.9622.9010.4316.9813.2219.98Table 2
RMS-DS for various overhead HV/BPL configurations and topologies.
RMS-DS (μs)150 kV275 kV400 kVDM4WtW1−2DM4WtW1−2DM4WtW1−2Urban case1.120.800.360.330.840.49Suburban case0.660.620.400.360.730.48Rural case0.790.720.240.230.810.31“LOS” case0.460.640.100.110.650.16Table 3
CB0.5  for various overhead HV/BPL configurations and topologies.
CB0.5 (kHz)150 kV275 kV400 kVDM4WtW1−2DM4WtW1−2DM4WtW1−2Urban case94001780029200294002540017000Suburban case240003240030800306002400020800Rural case330003200037200370002940026400“LOS” case384003280042600408003420030400Observations of Tables1, 2, and 3 demonstrate that the values of performance metrics validate the above overhead HV/BPL channel classification. Analytically, the metrics of average end-to-end channel attenuation of “LOS” and good channel class transmission are significantly better than the bad ones. Furthermore, an indicative picture of the multipath aggravation that affects primarily the bad channel class transmission can be obtained studying the metrics of RMS-DS and CB [39–47].Based on the statistical performance metrics of Tables1, 2, and 3, fundamental properties of several wireline systems (e.g., DSL, coaxial, and phone links) can be also validated in the overhead HV/BPL system case. First, the relationship between the channel attenuation and RMS-DS is investigated. The correlation between average end-to-end channel attenuation and RMS-DS can be easily confirmed observing the scatter plot presented in Figure 6 where the above set of numerical results of DM4 and WtW1−2 for the aforementioned indicative overhead HV/BPL topologies—as presented analytically in Tables 1 and 2 and denoted as overhead HV/BPL power networks in Figure 6—are plotted. In Figure 6, apart from these numerical results, the following sets of field trial measurements and regression trend lines are also presented:Figure 6
Scatter plot of RMS-DS versus average end-to-end channel attenuation for simulated channels—overhead HV/BPL networks for the propagation of DM4 and coupling scheme WtG1—(×), measured channels—underground MV/BPL power network (○), test MV/BPL power network (▵), in-home LV/BPL suburban networks (□), in-home LV/BPL urban networks (◊), and indoor LV/BPL power networks (+)—, and trend line curves—GAL (⋯), TON (--), and UNI1 (—) approaches—.(i)
measurements in real MV/BPL networks: (i) underground MV/BPL power network [39–41] and (ii) test MV/BPL power network [43],(ii)
measurements in real LV/BPL networks: (i) in-home LV/BPL suburban and urban networks [75, 76] and (ii) indoor LV/BPL power networks—inside homes and small offices [46],(iii)
regression lines of the form(στ)μs=v·(A̅)dB+w where (A̅)dB is the average end-to-end channel attenuation in dB and (στ)μs is the RMS-DS in μs of the BPL channel examined: (i) GAL approach, as given by [39–41], with robust regression parameters assumed v=0.0075 μs/dB and w=0.183 μs; (ii) TON approach, as given by [43], with robust regression parameters v and w assumed equal to 0.0197 μs/dB and 0 μs, respectively; (iii) the proposed UNI1 approach with regression parameters v = 0.0129 μs/dB and w=0.2472 μs. The least squares fitting method is applied to the aforementioned overhead HV/BPL numerical results for the evaluation of UNI1 approach parameters v and w.From Figure6, the following should be mentioned.(i)
All regression lines exhibit positive slopes clearly confirming that the average end-to-end channel attenuation and RMS-DS of overhead HV/BPL channels are positively correlated lognormal random variables regardless of the overhead HV power grid and channel type. This fundamental property of MV/BPL, LV/BPL, and several wireline channels is also validated in overhead HV/BPL case [39–47].(ii)
The proposed UNI1 trend line suggests a unified regression line that describes the correlation between channel attenuation and RMS-DS in transmission power grids. UNI1 approach offers a useful tool towards BPL/SG systems coexistence as it can be used to estimate the maximum data rate of transmission power grids being supported without the use of an equalizer.(iii)
The sets of overhead HV/BPL numerical results are well fitted by the proposed three trend lines. However, the differences between theoretical and experimental results highlight how the arbitrary choice of (i) the overhead HV power grid type, (ii) the overhead HV channel type considered, (iii) the examined overhead HV/BPL channel class, and (iv) the BPL network type in measurement campaigns, affects the statistics.(iv)
Essentially, it is demonstrated that the RMS-DS increases when the average end-to-end attenuation increases; therefore, BPL channels with large RMS-DS—severe intersymbol interference (ISI)—are also characterized by large values of end-to-end channel attenuation and, thus, low SNR for fixed transmit power.(v)
On the basis of the confirmed correlation, statistical channel models may be defined. These models can generate BPL channels either manually adjusted or stastitically assessed conferring a rather stochastic aspect to the existing deterministic channel class design [39–43, 46, 47].Based on the statistical performance metrics of Tables2 and 3, the second fundamental property of several wireline systems that can be also validated in the overhead HV/BPL system case is the correlation between CB and RMS-DS. In Figure 7, the scatter plot of the RMS-DS versus the CBX—CB0.9, CB0.7, and CB0.5—is presented for the following sets of numerical results, measurements, and regression trend lines:(i)
numerical results—RMS-DS versus CB0.5—for the overhead HV/BPL channels for the propagation of DM4 and for the coupling scheme WtW1−2—as presented in Tables 1 and 2,(ii)
field trial measurements: (i) in indoor LV/BPL power networks (inside homes and small offices)—RMS-DS versus CB0.9 [46]—and (ii) in cruise ship LV/BPL power networks—RMS-DS versus CB0.7 [44],(iii)
hyperbolic trend lines of the form(στ)μs=y/(CBX)kHz where (CBX)kHz is the CBX in kHz: (i) ANT0.9 approach, as given by [44, 45, 47], with robust regression parameter assumed y=74 μs·kHz that approximates the relation between RMS-DS and CB0.9, (ii) ANT0.7 approach, as given by [44, 45, 47], with robust regression parameter y assumed equal to 236 μs·kHz that describes the relation between RMS-DS and CB0.7; (iii) the proposed UNI2 approach with parameter y assumed equal to 12920 μs·kHz obtained using robust linear least square error fitting between the trend line and the observed overhead HV/BPL numerical results.Figure 7
Scatter plot of RMS-DS versus CB for the simulated channels—overhead HV/BPL networks for the propagation of DM4 and coupling scheme WtW1-2—(black ×), measured channels—cruise ship LV/BPL power networks (□) and indoor LV/BPL power networks (red ×)—, and trend line curves—UNI2 (—), ANT0.7 (-·), and ANT0.9 (- -) approaches (logarithmic scale was used for the x- and y-axes).On the basis of the confirmed correlation between CB and RMS-DS, additional remarks are pointed out [44–47].(i)
In the first place, CB is a statistical measure of the range of frequencies over which the overhead HV/BPL channel can be considered to have approximately equal end-to-end attenuation and linear phase. The values of the estimated CB0.5 for overhead HV/BPL channels are ranging above 9.4 MHz, regardless of the overhead HV power grid type, the overhead HV channel type considered, and the examined overhead HV/BPL channel class. In the second place, the RMS-DS describes the dispersion in the time domain due to multipath transmission, and its maximum value for the overhead HV/BPL channels examined is equal to 1.12 μs that is comparable to indoor LV/BPL channel RMS-DS values. Hence, apart from low-loss attenuation characteristics that have already been mentioned, overhead HV/BPL power grid presents excellent performance as it concerns flat-fading features and multipath dispersion. In system design terms, higher CB values and lower multipath effects determine faster symbol transmission rates having an impact on the choice of the parameters of multicarrier systems applied over overhead HV/BPL systems [1, 40, 41, 47, 76].(ii)
The variability of the CBX and RMS-DS depends on the CB correlation level, the overhead HV/BPL channel class, the topology characteristics, the overhead HV/BPL power grid type considered, and the overhead HV/BPL channel type examined. Their relation quantifies the effects of frequency selective behavior and multipath propagation environment that further affect BPL channel capacity [14, 44, 48].(iii)
CB and RMS-DS are inversely related and their relation can be approximated by hyperbolic functions. UNI2 approach and the other trend line results are in excellent agreement with the simulations results and the measurements, respectively.From the previous figures, several interesting conclusions concerning overhead HV/BPL transmission characteristics may be deduced as follows.(1)
Though determined for 25 km long HV connections—compared to the shorter connections of MV and LV cases [1, 2, 10, 14–17, 24, 26–29, 74]—BPL transmission via the overhead HV grid exhibits low-loss characteristics regardless of the overhead HV power grid type favoring the exploitation of HV/BPL bandwidth.(2)
As usually done in BPL systems [14, 15, 24, 71], overhead HV/BPL channels are classified into three classes depending on their spectral behavior: “LOS” channels, good channels, and bad channels. HV/BPL transmission in the majority of areas is classified into the good channels class.(3)
In overhead HV/BPL channels, it is verified that channel attenuation and RMS-DS are (positively) correlated lognormal random variables [39–47]. Moreover, CB and RMS-DS are inversely related and may be approximated by hyperbolic functions [44–47]. These fundamental properties of several wireline and BPL systems (e.g., DSL, coaxial, phone, LV/BPL, and MV/BPL links) are also validated in the overhead HV/BPL system case. As it concerns these inherent statistical characteristics of overhead HV/BPL systems, suitable approximations can be proposed, like UNI1 and UNI2 regression trend lines.(4)
Observing the same characteristics of HV/BPL, MV/BPL, and LV/BPL channels—especially in Figures6 and 7—a preliminary step towards their common analysis is introduced; through the presented hybrid method and the proposed regression approximations, BPL systems may be examined under a common PHY framework. This introduction of unified tools for the common handling of BPL transmission and distribution networks is to be seen as strong interoperability guarantee in a SG landscape.(5)
Apart from the low-loss attenuation behavior, overhead HV/BPL channels demonstrate impressive flat-fading characteristics and low multipath dispersion rendering, thus, HV/BPL transmission as a fiber-optic transmission alternative solution.(6)
The deterministic BPL channel models can coexist with statistical BPL ones in order to simulate a wide variety of BPL channels and generate random class-oriented BPL topologies.(7)
Concluding the above HV/BPL technology analysis, it should be highlighted that SG will be supported by a heterogeneous set of networking technologies, as no single solution fits all scenarios. HV/BPL, MV/BPL, and LV/BPL systems need to work in a compatible way (intraoperate) before BPL technology interoperates with other broadband technologies, such as wired (e.g., fiber and DSL) and wireless (e.g., WiFi and WiMax). Based on an IP-based power system, related issues to BPL technology such as compatible frequencies, equipment and signaling, adequate injected power spectral density (IPSD) levels, area coverage, and scalable capacity may be further facilitated, taking into account the specific features of HV/BPL, MV/BPL, and LV/BPL transmission together with the overall system requirements [1, 14, 24, 25, 71].


## 4.1. Factors Influencing Overhead HV/BPL Transmission

The following discussion will focus on the transmission characteristics related to (i) the CM and the DMs of the aforementioned overhead HV/BPL configurations and (ii) the WtW and the WtG coupling schemes related to these overhead HV/BPL systems as well.The simple overhead HV/BPL topology of Figure3, having N branches, has been considered. With reference to Figure 3, the transmitting and the receiving ends are assumed matched to the characteristic impedance of the mode considered, whereas the branch terminations Zbk, k=1,…,N are assumed open circuit [2, 13–15, 24, 26, 27, 49, 50, 64].Figure 3
End-to-end HV/BPL connection withN branches and a network module [15, 26].Today, thousands of km of overhead HV lines are installed in more than 120 countries. These lines stretch from approximately 25 km to 190 km from the generation points before reaching any population centers. Shorter branches in the range of 10 km to 50 km are used in order to connect overhead HV transmission lines either between them or with HV/MV substations [2, 13, 25, 49, 50, 64, 67, 68].To compare the modal channels with the coupling scheme channels, a relatively dense overhead HV/BPL network of path length up to 25 km is assumed. The following representative overhead HV/BPL topology has been examined—see Figure3.(1)
The “LOS” transmission along the average end-to-end distanceL=L1+⋯+LN+1=25 km when no branches are encountered. This topology corresponds to line-of-sight transmission in wireless channels.In Figures4(a), 4(c), and 4(e), the end-to-end channel attenuation from A to B is plotted versus frequency for the “LOS” transmission case for the propagation of CM and DMi-1, i=2,…,n for the overhead HV/BPL configurations of Figures 1(a), 1(b), and 1(c), respectively. In Figure 4(b), among the possible n·(n-1) WtW and n WtG configurations, the end-to-end coupling channel attenuation from A to B for the “LOS” transmission case is plotted versus frequency in the case of overhead HV/BPL configuration of Figure 1(a) for the coupling schemes WtW1-2, WtW2-1, WtW1-3, WtW5-2, WtG1, and WtG4. In Figures 4(d) and 4(f), similar curves are plotted in the case of overhead HV/BPL configuration of Figure 1(b)—coupling schemes WtW1-2, WtW1-4, WtW4-1, WtW7-3, WtG1, and WtG7—and Figure 1(c)—coupling schemes WtW1-2, WtW1-4, WtW4-1, WtW8-3, WtG1, and WtG7—, respectively.End-to-end channel attenuation versus frequency for “LOS” transmission case, (for plot clarity reasons, the subchannel frequency spacing is equal to 1 MHz). (a, b) Modal and coupling scheme analysis of 150 kV single-circuit, respectively. (c, d) Modal and coupling scheme analysis of 275 kV double-circuit, respectively. (e, f) Modal and coupling scheme analysis of 400 kV double-circuit, respectively.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)From Figures4(a), 4(b), 4(c), 4(d), 4(e), and 4(f), several interesting remarks may be highlighted.(i)
The common modes between the three overhead HV/BPL configurations examined—CM and DMi−1, i=2,3,4,5—are characterized by relevant spectral behaviors—see Figures 4(a), 4(c), and 4(e). This inherent modal similarity of overhead HV/BPL systems is reflected on similar plots regarding spectral behavior of WtW and WtG coupling schemes—see Figures 4(b), 4(d), and 4(f).(ii)
As it has already been mentioned, it is confirmed that WtW coupling schemes are primarily affected by the propagation of DMs, whereas WtG coupling schemes are influenced mostly by CM.(iii)
ObservingWtW1-2 andWtW2-1 curve plots from Figure 4(b) and WtW1-4 andWtW4-1 curve plots from Figures 4(d) and 4(f), it is clearly shown that the isotropy that characterizes other MV/BPL and LV/BPL channels—presented in [25, 31, 49, 64, 67]—is also validated in overhead HV/BPL systems.(iv)
Although WtG coupling schemes present better average attenuation characteristics in comparison with WtW coupling schemes, two important factors that should be taken under consideration for appropriately evaluating HV/BPL coupling systems are (i) the significant EMI of WtG coupling schemes to other already licensed wireless communications [3, 69, 70] and (ii) the spectral notches that are observed in the end-to-end channel attenuation of WtG coupling schemes due to CMs. Therefore, an interesting tradeoff between EMI protection, frequency selective behavior, and channel capacity occurs during the suitable coupling scheme selection [14, 15, 47].(v)
The “LOS” transmission channels present low-loss characteristics at frequencies ranging from 1 MHz to 100 MHz over a 25 km repeater span regardless of the overhead HV power grid type considered. The fact that overhead HV/BPL lines resemble a low-loss transmission system shows as an attractive broadband last mile solution [13–15, 24, 26–28, 34, 38, 50].As it has been shown, the overhead HV/BPL “LOS” configurations tend to present attenuation characteristics comparable to the fiber-optic ones. Practically, this favorable attenuation behavior still exists in real overhead HV topologies. With reference to Figure3, four indicative overhead HV topologies concerning end-to-end connections of average lengths equal to 25 km are examined. These topologies, which are common for 150 kV single-circuit, 275 kV double-circuit, and 400 kV double-circuit overhead HV/BPL systems, are the “LOS” transmission topology referred to above and in [2, 13, 49, 50, 64, 67, 68]:(2)
a typical urban topology (urban case) withN=3 branches (L1=1.15 km, L2=12.125 km,L3=8.425 km,L4=3.3 km, Lb1=27.6 km, Lb2=17.2 km, Lb3=33.1 km),(3)
a typical suburban topology (suburban case) withN=2 branches (L1=9.025 km, L2=12.75 km, L3=3.225 km,Lb1=46.8 km, Lb2=13.4 km),(4)
a typical rural topology (rural case) with onlyN=1 branch (L1=3.75 km, L2=21.25 km, Lb1=21.1 km).As usually done to simplify the analysis and due to relatively comparable results among modal and coupling scheme channels—as it concerns the end-to-end channel attenuation of the “LOS” transmission case from Figures4(a), 4(b), 4(c), 4(d), 4(e), and 4(f)—[5, 6, 14–16, 24, 27, 38, 71], only one mode—say DM4—and only one coupling scheme—say WtW1−2—for the modal and coupling scheme analysis, respectively, of each overhead HV/BPL system configuration of Figures 1(a), 1(b), and 1(c) will be examined, hereafter. This assumption does not affect the generality of the analysis concerning the transmission characteristics of the examined overhead HV/BPL topologies in the range from 1 MHz to 100 MHz, provides a representative picture of the real-world overhead HV/BPL network situation, and is adopted for the sake of terseness and simplicity.In Figures5(a) and 5(b), the end-to-end channel attenuation from A to B of overhead HV/BPL configuration of Figure 1(a) is plotted with respect to frequency for the aforementioned four indicative topologies for the propagation of DM4 and WtW1−2, respectively. Similar plots are also plotted in Figures 5(c) and 5(d) in the case of overhead HV/BPL configuration of Figure 1(b) and in Figures 5(e) and 5(f) in the case of overhead HV/BPL configuration of Figure 1(c).End-to-end channel attenuation versus frequency for urban case, suburban case, rural case, and “LOS” transmission case when open circuit branch terminations are assumed (for plot clarity reasons, the subchannel frequency spacing is equal to 1 MHz). (a, b) Modal—DM4—and coupling scheme—WtW1−2—analysis of 150 kV single-circuit, respectively. (c, d) Modal—DM4—and coupling scheme—WtW1−2—analysis of 275 kV double-circuit, respectively. (e, f) Modal—DM4—and coupling scheme—WtW1−2—analysis of 400 kV double-circuit, respectively.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)According to the picture obtained from their spectral behavior—see Figures5(a), 5(b), 5(c), 5(d), 5(e), and 5(f), the overhead HV/BPL topologies may be classified into three major channel classes regardless of the overhead HV/BPL channel type examined—either modal or coupling scheme channel—(see also [14, 15, 24, 71] for other MV/BPL and LV/BPL channels)(1)
The firt one is“LOS” channels, when no branches are encountered, and, consequently, no spectral notches are observed. This case corresponds to the best possible overhead HV/BPL transmission conditions, encountered when long-distance transmission occurs.(2)
The second isgood channels, when the number of branches is small and their electrical length is large. Shallow spectral notches are observed. Overhead HV/BPL transmission primarily near rural and suburban areas belongs to this channel class.(3)
The third isbad channels, when the number of branches is large and their electrical length is small. Deep spectral notches are observed. Overhead HV/BPL transmission near urban areas belongs to this channel class.Thus, the spectral behavior of the above overhead HV/BPL channel classes affects critically the transmission characteristics of overhead HV/BPL channels [10, 14, 15, 22, 24, 26, 72–74].


## 4.2. On the Statistical Relationship between Performance Metrics in Overhead HV/BPL Transmission

Based on the statistical performance metrics presented in Section4, a physically meaningful statistical characterization of the BPL channels is obtained permitting important properties of the overhead HV/BPL systems to be revealed. Tables 1, 2, and 3 summarize the metrics of average end-to-end channel attenuation, RMS-DS, and CB0.5, respectively, for the propagation of DM4 and WtW1−2 for 150 kV single-circuit, 275 kV double-circuit, and 400 kV double-circuit overhead HV/BPL configurations for each of the aforementioned four indicative HV/BPL topologies.Table 1
Average end-to-end channel attenuation for various overhead HV/BPL configurations and topologies.
Average end-to-end channel attenuation (dB)150 kV275 kV400 kVDM4WtW1−2DM4WtW1−2DM4WtW1−2Urban case21.8232.4120.0626.7323.2529.48Suburban case19.3029.9116.8623.4719.8426.37Rural case16.0826.3613.6520.2316.4323.14“LOS” case12.9622.9010.4316.9813.2219.98Table 2
RMS-DS for various overhead HV/BPL configurations and topologies.
RMS-DS (μs)150 kV275 kV400 kVDM4WtW1−2DM4WtW1−2DM4WtW1−2Urban case1.120.800.360.330.840.49Suburban case0.660.620.400.360.730.48Rural case0.790.720.240.230.810.31“LOS” case0.460.640.100.110.650.16Table 3
CB0.5  for various overhead HV/BPL configurations and topologies.
CB0.5 (kHz)150 kV275 kV400 kVDM4WtW1−2DM4WtW1−2DM4WtW1−2Urban case94001780029200294002540017000Suburban case240003240030800306002400020800Rural case330003200037200370002940026400“LOS” case384003280042600408003420030400Observations of Tables1, 2, and 3 demonstrate that the values of performance metrics validate the above overhead HV/BPL channel classification. Analytically, the metrics of average end-to-end channel attenuation of “LOS” and good channel class transmission are significantly better than the bad ones. Furthermore, an indicative picture of the multipath aggravation that affects primarily the bad channel class transmission can be obtained studying the metrics of RMS-DS and CB [39–47].Based on the statistical performance metrics of Tables1, 2, and 3, fundamental properties of several wireline systems (e.g., DSL, coaxial, and phone links) can be also validated in the overhead HV/BPL system case. First, the relationship between the channel attenuation and RMS-DS is investigated. The correlation between average end-to-end channel attenuation and RMS-DS can be easily confirmed observing the scatter plot presented in Figure 6 where the above set of numerical results of DM4 and WtW1−2 for the aforementioned indicative overhead HV/BPL topologies—as presented analytically in Tables 1 and 2 and denoted as overhead HV/BPL power networks in Figure 6—are plotted. In Figure 6, apart from these numerical results, the following sets of field trial measurements and regression trend lines are also presented:Figure 6
Scatter plot of RMS-DS versus average end-to-end channel attenuation for simulated channels—overhead HV/BPL networks for the propagation of DM4 and coupling scheme WtG1—(×), measured channels—underground MV/BPL power network (○), test MV/BPL power network (▵), in-home LV/BPL suburban networks (□), in-home LV/BPL urban networks (◊), and indoor LV/BPL power networks (+)—, and trend line curves—GAL (⋯), TON (--), and UNI1 (—) approaches—.(i)
measurements in real MV/BPL networks: (i) underground MV/BPL power network [39–41] and (ii) test MV/BPL power network [43],(ii)
measurements in real LV/BPL networks: (i) in-home LV/BPL suburban and urban networks [75, 76] and (ii) indoor LV/BPL power networks—inside homes and small offices [46],(iii)
regression lines of the form(στ)μs=v·(A̅)dB+w where (A̅)dB is the average end-to-end channel attenuation in dB and (στ)μs is the RMS-DS in μs of the BPL channel examined: (i) GAL approach, as given by [39–41], with robust regression parameters assumed v=0.0075 μs/dB and w=0.183 μs; (ii) TON approach, as given by [43], with robust regression parameters v and w assumed equal to 0.0197 μs/dB and 0 μs, respectively; (iii) the proposed UNI1 approach with regression parameters v = 0.0129 μs/dB and w=0.2472 μs. The least squares fitting method is applied to the aforementioned overhead HV/BPL numerical results for the evaluation of UNI1 approach parameters v and w.From Figure6, the following should be mentioned.(i)
All regression lines exhibit positive slopes clearly confirming that the average end-to-end channel attenuation and RMS-DS of overhead HV/BPL channels are positively correlated lognormal random variables regardless of the overhead HV power grid and channel type. This fundamental property of MV/BPL, LV/BPL, and several wireline channels is also validated in overhead HV/BPL case [39–47].(ii)
The proposed UNI1 trend line suggests a unified regression line that describes the correlation between channel attenuation and RMS-DS in transmission power grids. UNI1 approach offers a useful tool towards BPL/SG systems coexistence as it can be used to estimate the maximum data rate of transmission power grids being supported without the use of an equalizer.(iii)
The sets of overhead HV/BPL numerical results are well fitted by the proposed three trend lines. However, the differences between theoretical and experimental results highlight how the arbitrary choice of (i) the overhead HV power grid type, (ii) the overhead HV channel type considered, (iii) the examined overhead HV/BPL channel class, and (iv) the BPL network type in measurement campaigns, affects the statistics.(iv)
Essentially, it is demonstrated that the RMS-DS increases when the average end-to-end attenuation increases; therefore, BPL channels with large RMS-DS—severe intersymbol interference (ISI)—are also characterized by large values of end-to-end channel attenuation and, thus, low SNR for fixed transmit power.(v)
On the basis of the confirmed correlation, statistical channel models may be defined. These models can generate BPL channels either manually adjusted or stastitically assessed conferring a rather stochastic aspect to the existing deterministic channel class design [39–43, 46, 47].Based on the statistical performance metrics of Tables2 and 3, the second fundamental property of several wireline systems that can be also validated in the overhead HV/BPL system case is the correlation between CB and RMS-DS. In Figure 7, the scatter plot of the RMS-DS versus the CBX—CB0.9, CB0.7, and CB0.5—is presented for the following sets of numerical results, measurements, and regression trend lines:(i)
numerical results—RMS-DS versus CB0.5—for the overhead HV/BPL channels for the propagation of DM4 and for the coupling scheme WtW1−2—as presented in Tables 1 and 2,(ii)
field trial measurements: (i) in indoor LV/BPL power networks (inside homes and small offices)—RMS-DS versus CB0.9 [46]—and (ii) in cruise ship LV/BPL power networks—RMS-DS versus CB0.7 [44],(iii)
hyperbolic trend lines of the form(στ)μs=y/(CBX)kHz where (CBX)kHz is the CBX in kHz: (i) ANT0.9 approach, as given by [44, 45, 47], with robust regression parameter assumed y=74 μs·kHz that approximates the relation between RMS-DS and CB0.9, (ii) ANT0.7 approach, as given by [44, 45, 47], with robust regression parameter y assumed equal to 236 μs·kHz that describes the relation between RMS-DS and CB0.7; (iii) the proposed UNI2 approach with parameter y assumed equal to 12920 μs·kHz obtained using robust linear least square error fitting between the trend line and the observed overhead HV/BPL numerical results.Figure 7
Scatter plot of RMS-DS versus CB for the simulated channels—overhead HV/BPL networks for the propagation of DM4 and coupling scheme WtW1-2—(black ×), measured channels—cruise ship LV/BPL power networks (□) and indoor LV/BPL power networks (red ×)—, and trend line curves—UNI2 (—), ANT0.7 (-·), and ANT0.9 (- -) approaches (logarithmic scale was used for the x- and y-axes).On the basis of the confirmed correlation between CB and RMS-DS, additional remarks are pointed out [44–47].(i)
In the first place, CB is a statistical measure of the range of frequencies over which the overhead HV/BPL channel can be considered to have approximately equal end-to-end attenuation and linear phase. The values of the estimated CB0.5 for overhead HV/BPL channels are ranging above 9.4 MHz, regardless of the overhead HV power grid type, the overhead HV channel type considered, and the examined overhead HV/BPL channel class. In the second place, the RMS-DS describes the dispersion in the time domain due to multipath transmission, and its maximum value for the overhead HV/BPL channels examined is equal to 1.12 μs that is comparable to indoor LV/BPL channel RMS-DS values. Hence, apart from low-loss attenuation characteristics that have already been mentioned, overhead HV/BPL power grid presents excellent performance as it concerns flat-fading features and multipath dispersion. In system design terms, higher CB values and lower multipath effects determine faster symbol transmission rates having an impact on the choice of the parameters of multicarrier systems applied over overhead HV/BPL systems [1, 40, 41, 47, 76].(ii)
The variability of the CBX and RMS-DS depends on the CB correlation level, the overhead HV/BPL channel class, the topology characteristics, the overhead HV/BPL power grid type considered, and the overhead HV/BPL channel type examined. Their relation quantifies the effects of frequency selective behavior and multipath propagation environment that further affect BPL channel capacity [14, 44, 48].(iii)
CB and RMS-DS are inversely related and their relation can be approximated by hyperbolic functions. UNI2 approach and the other trend line results are in excellent agreement with the simulations results and the measurements, respectively.From the previous figures, several interesting conclusions concerning overhead HV/BPL transmission characteristics may be deduced as follows.(1)
Though determined for 25 km long HV connections—compared to the shorter connections of MV and LV cases [1, 2, 10, 14–17, 24, 26–29, 74]—BPL transmission via the overhead HV grid exhibits low-loss characteristics regardless of the overhead HV power grid type favoring the exploitation of HV/BPL bandwidth.(2)
As usually done in BPL systems [14, 15, 24, 71], overhead HV/BPL channels are classified into three classes depending on their spectral behavior: “LOS” channels, good channels, and bad channels. HV/BPL transmission in the majority of areas is classified into the good channels class.(3)
In overhead HV/BPL channels, it is verified that channel attenuation and RMS-DS are (positively) correlated lognormal random variables [39–47]. Moreover, CB and RMS-DS are inversely related and may be approximated by hyperbolic functions [44–47]. These fundamental properties of several wireline and BPL systems (e.g., DSL, coaxial, phone, LV/BPL, and MV/BPL links) are also validated in the overhead HV/BPL system case. As it concerns these inherent statistical characteristics of overhead HV/BPL systems, suitable approximations can be proposed, like UNI1 and UNI2 regression trend lines.(4)
Observing the same characteristics of HV/BPL, MV/BPL, and LV/BPL channels—especially in Figures6 and 7—a preliminary step towards their common analysis is introduced; through the presented hybrid method and the proposed regression approximations, BPL systems may be examined under a common PHY framework. This introduction of unified tools for the common handling of BPL transmission and distribution networks is to be seen as strong interoperability guarantee in a SG landscape.(5)
Apart from the low-loss attenuation behavior, overhead HV/BPL channels demonstrate impressive flat-fading characteristics and low multipath dispersion rendering, thus, HV/BPL transmission as a fiber-optic transmission alternative solution.(6)
The deterministic BPL channel models can coexist with statistical BPL ones in order to simulate a wide variety of BPL channels and generate random class-oriented BPL topologies.(7)
Concluding the above HV/BPL technology analysis, it should be highlighted that SG will be supported by a heterogeneous set of networking technologies, as no single solution fits all scenarios. HV/BPL, MV/BPL, and LV/BPL systems need to work in a compatible way (intraoperate) before BPL technology interoperates with other broadband technologies, such as wired (e.g., fiber and DSL) and wireless (e.g., WiFi and WiMax). Based on an IP-based power system, related issues to BPL technology such as compatible frequencies, equipment and signaling, adequate injected power spectral density (IPSD) levels, area coverage, and scalable capacity may be further facilitated, taking into account the specific features of HV/BPL, MV/BPL, and LV/BPL transmission together with the overall system requirements [1, 14, 24, 25, 71].


## 5. Conclusions

This paper has focused on the broadband transmission characteristics and the statistical performance metrics of overhead HV/BPL transmission power grid.The transmission characteristics of overhead HV/BPL transmission networks have been studied applying the well-known TM method. The broadband transmission capability of such networks depends on the frequency, the overhead HV power grid type, the coupling scheme applied, the mode examined, physical properties of the MTL configuration used, the end-to-end—“LOS”—distance, and the number, the electrical length, and the terminations of the branches along the end-to-end overhead HV/BPL signal propagation.Based on the statistical performance metrics of overhead HV/BPL transmission networks, fundamental properties of several wireline channels, that are (i) the positive correlation between end-to-end channel attenuation and RMS-DS and (ii) the hyperbolic correlation between CB and RMS-DS; have also been validated in the case of overhead HV/BPL systems against relevant sets of field measurements, numerical results, and statistical distributions. Based on these inherent attributes of BPL systems, new regression trend lines have been proposed. The new approximations give a further boost towards BPL system interoperability.The low-loss nature of overhead HV/BPL systems, the impressive flat-fading characteristics, and the relatively low multipath dispersion over a 25 km repeater span well beyond 100 MHz render overhead HV power lines as an alternative fiber-optic technology permitting the further exploitation of HV/BPL bandwidth towards a unified transmission/distribution of SG power grid.



---

*Source: 875632-2012-05-31.xml*