# High-Gain SIR Dual-Band Antenna Based on CSRR-Enhanced SIW for 2.4/5.2/5.8 GHz WLAN

Authors: Caixia Feng; Yongqiang Kang; Lijuan Dong; Lihong Wang
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

This paper presents a dual-band step impedance resonator (SIR) antenna based on metamaterial-inspired periodic structure of coupled complementary split-ring resonators substrate-integrated waveguide (CSRR-SIW). The antenna supports wireless local area networks (WLAN) bands at 2.4/5.2/5.8 GHz. The CSRRs and two branches of the SIR element are etched on the top and bottom metal surfaces of the substrate. The SIR element produces a fundamental frequencyf1 at 2.4 GHz and a second harmonic frequency fs2 at 5.7 GHz. Meanwhile, the CSRRs produces a resonant frequency at high-frequency band around 5.2 GHz, which can be combined with the second harmonic frequency fs2 at 5.7 GHz. The high-frequency bandwidth can then be broadened. The simulated and measured results show that the dual operation bands with bandwidths of 16% from 2.25 GHz to 2.64 GHz and 18.2% from 5 GHz to 6 GHz for |S11| < −10 dB are achieved. Meanwhile, the proposed antenna has peak gains ranging from 6.5 dBi to 7 dBi and from 7 dBi to 7.7 dBi in the lower and upper bands, respectively. Compared with many previously reported dual-band antenna designs, the proposed antenna achieves comparable bandwidth performance and larger gain per unit area with a relatively smaller size. Moreover, the simple structure renders the proposed antenna has the advantage of easy-processable and cost-effective implementation.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Multiband band antennas are widely used in modern wireless systems, as well as radar [1]. Scholars have carried out a lot of prominent research works on the dual-band antenna. In [2], a quasi-Yagi antenna with operating bands around 1.8, 2.4, and 3.5 GHz is proposed. The driver uniform impedance resonator (UIR) elements, arm 1 to arm 3, are excited at different frequencies as half-wave dipoles. In [3], a dual-wideband dipole directional antenna is proposed. The antenna consists of a dipole with crooked arms and parasitic Γ-shaped branches and double reflecting floors. In [4], a dual-band magnetoelectric antenna is proposed. A folded magnetic dipole antenna that is realized by a vertically assembled shorted patch is introduced to achieve wide bandwidth. In [5], a dual-band linearly polarized tag antenna for indoor positioning systems is proposed. U-shaped inverted-F antenna for the UHF band is designed to surround the dipole for the UWB band. In [6], a wideband three-dimensional dual-band magnetoelectric (ME) dipole antenna is presented for WLAN and WiMAX applications. A full-metal rectangular director is loaded right above the ME dipole antenna and resonates at around 3.6 GHz due to the excitation of the long electric dipole. In [7], a dual-band 3 × 2 antenna arrays with 10.6% from 2.3 to 2.56 GHz and 16.6% from 3 to 4.2 GHz bandwidths is proposed. The antenna is realized on a FR4 substrate and a PTFE substrate. A miniaturized dual-band dipole array antenna consisting of two parallel 1 × 4 subarrays and three-layers of substrate for use in base stations is proposed in [8]. In [9], a 4 × 4 Ku/Ka dual-band shared-aperture beam scanning antenna array is proposed. The concept of the structure reuse is described. To increase the aperture utilization efficiency, the Ku-band antenna is employed as some sidewalls of the Ka-band antenna. In [10], a metaresonator-inspired dual-band antenna for 2.4/5.2 GHz WLAN applications is proposed. Dual band operation is achieved by utilizing stacking technique on a dog-bone shaped dipole antenna. In [11], a conventional single-band printed antenna is loaded with via-less composite right/left-handed (CRLH) unit cells to achieve multiband operation. The plane of broadband transition is perpendicular to the antenna, and the structure of the whole antenna is three-dimensional. In [12], a mechanically reconfigurable dual-band slot antenna with wide tuning ranges is proposed. Although the above dual-band antennas realize good performance such as wideband or high gain, their structures are either three-dimensional or multilayer, which require a rather demanding nonplanar fabrication process and are difficult to be integrated on the planar circuits. The novel fully planar SIW based on metamaterial-inspired periodic structure of coupled complementary split-ring resonators (CSRR-SIW) is proposed in [13]. The CSRR-SIW is an attractive candidate for a cost-effective implementation of microwave antenna due to the fully planar structure and the associated ease of implementation [14].In our prior work [15], a broadband bow-tie antenna-based CSRR-SIW is proposed. It confirms that the CSRR-SIW not only confines wave propagation within the waveguide but also radiates electromagnetic waves through the CSRRs. The CSRRs produce a resonant frequency, which can be combined with the two resonant frequencies produced by the bow-tie patch and the feedline of the bow-tie patch. The bandwidth can then be broadened. Moreover, the gain in the low-frequency bandwidth is enhanced by decreasing the gap width of the CSRR.In this article, the fully planar CSRR-SIW is applied to the design of the dual-band step impedance resonator (SIR) antenna for WLAN. First, the dual-band working mechanism is studied, including the length of the SIR element and the width of the wider strip to the antenna performance. Finally, the effect of the tilt angle of the inclined feed lines on gain enhancement of the dual-band CSRR-SIW SIR antenna is discussed. Compared with the previously reported dual-band antenna designs in [7–12], the proposed antenna achieves comparable bandwidth performance and larger gain per unit area with a relatively smaller size. In addition, the proposed antenna only consists of one layer of copper-coated substrate. It can be realized by ordinary etching techniques. Therefore, the proposed antenna structure has easy-processable and cost-effective implementation.


## 2. Design of SIR Dual-Band Antenna

### 2.1. Antenna Geometry

The proposed antenna is shown in Figure1. The CSRR-SIW is the same as that in [15]. The difference is that the main element is SIR, which can achieve a dual operation bands which consists of a fundamental frequency f1 and a second harmonic frequency fs2. The CSRRs and two branches of the SIR element are etched on the top and bottom metal surfaces of the substrate. The substrate is Rogers 5880. The thickness of 0.504 mm and a dielectric constant of 2.2. Table 1 shows the dimensions of the proposed antenna.Figure 1
Geometry of the proposed antenna. (a) Top and (b) bottom.
(a)(b)Table 1
The structure parameters of antenna (units: mm).
Dimensionsw1w2w3w4w5dθl1l2l3l4rirogValue1.5581.553290.120°598.7341.62.40.5


### 2.2. Dual-Band Working Mechanism

To obtain a dual-band working, we use the SIR as the main radiating element. For the SIR, the impedance of the narrow and wider strip isZ1 and Z2, and the corresponding lengths is θ1 and θ2, respectively. The resonance condition can be described as follows:(1)tanθ1⋅tanθ2=Rz,where impedance ratio Rz is(2)Rz=Z2Z1.To get a compact size, the electrical lengthsθ1 and θ2 are given in [16] as(3)θ1=θ2=arctanRz.On this premise, the relationship between the second harmonic frequencyfs2 and fundamental frequency f1 is given by(4)fs2f1=π2arctanRz.In this case, the appropriate resonant frequenciesfs2 and f1 can be designed by adjusting the impedance ratio Rz. Compared with the UIR elements in [2], the SIR element has great degree of freedom in structure and design.In this paper, we designedf1 and fs2 as 2.4 GHz and 5.7 GHz, respectively. Substituting fs2 and f1 into (4), we obtain Rz is about 0.6. Then, substituting Rz into (3), we obtain θ1 = θ2 = 37.8°. Then, we get the parameters of the SIR l2, l3, w3, and w4, as shown in Table 1.In Figure2, the current distribution over the antenna at 2.4 GHz, 5.2 GHz, and 5.7 GHz are shown. We observed from Figures 2(a) and 2(c) that the current is concentrated in the SIR element at f1 = 2.4 GHz and fs2 = 5.7 GHz. From Figure 2(b), the current is concentrated in the CSRRs at 5.2 GHz. That is to say, the SIR element produces a fundamental frequency f1 at 2.4 GHz and a second harmonic frequency fs2 at 5.7 GHz. Meanwhile, the CSRRs produces a resonant frequency at high-frequency band around 5.2 GHz.Figure 2
The current distribution at different frequencies over the antenna: (a) 2.4 GHz, (b) 5.2 GHz, and (c) 5.7 GHz.
(a)(b)(c)Figure3 shows the simulated |S11| of the proposed SIR dual-band antenna. In Figure 3, there are three resonant frequencies at f1 = 2.4 GHz, f2 = 5.2 GHz, and fs2 = 5.7 GHz. The circumference of the CSRR resonant ring is approximately λ/4 (λ is the wavelength at f2 = 5.2 GHz). By adjusting the structure parameters, f2 and fs2 can be combined with each other. The high-frequency bandwidth can then be broadened. In this case, a dual-band dipole antenna based on CSRR-SIW can be obtained.Figure 3
The simulated |S11| for the proposed antennas.


### 2.3. Parametric Analysis

A parametric study of key parameters based on CST MWS is given to assist with the design procedure. The results show that the length of the SIR elementl2 and l3, the width of the wider strip w4, and the width of the ground plane w5 are the key parameters that affects antenna performance. Figures 4–6 show the results.Figure 4
The simulated |S11| for different l2.Figure 5
The simulated |S11| for different w4.Figure 6
The simulated |S11| for different w5.In Figure4, the effect of l2 on the |S11| is shown. We observed that l2 mainly affects the resonance at fundamental frequency f1 and the second harmonic frequency fs2. With the increase of l2, the effective electrical length θ1 of the narrow strip and the whole electrical length of the SIR element increases. Therefore, the fundamental frequency f1 and the second harmonic frequency fs2 decrease with the increasing of l2, as shown in Figure 4. In Figure 4, when l2 = 7 mm, there are three resonant frequencies: f1 = 2.6 GHz, f2 = 5.2 GHz, and fs2 = 5.9 GHz. The lower operation bandwidth is from 2.4 GHz to 2.75 GHz. When l2 = 8 mm, the resonance at f2 do not change, but f1 and fs2 decrease to 2.47 GHz and 5.8 GHz, respectively. The lower operation bandwidth is from 2.3 GHz to 2.65 GHz. When l2 = 9 mm, f1 and fs2 decreases to 2.4 GHz and 5.7 GHz, respectively. The widest lower operation bandwidth of 16.6% from 2.2 GHz to 2.6 GHz is obtained. The higher operation bandwidth is from 4.9 GHz to 6 GHz.In Figure5, the effect of w4 on the |S11| is shown. We observed that w4 mainly affects the resonance at fundamental frequency f1 near about 2.4 GHz. With the increase of w4, the impedance ratio Rz of the SIR element decreases. And then the whole electrical length of the SIR decreases according to (1). Therefore, the fundamental frequency f1 increases with the increasing of w4, as shown in Figure 5. The effective electrical length θ1 of the narrow strip of the SIR element has no change, and then the second harmonic frequency fs2 almost has no change. In Figure 5, when w4 = 2 mm, there are three resonant frequencies: f1 = 2.35 GHz, f2 = 5.2 GHz, and fs2 = 5.7 GHz. The lower operation bandwidth is from 2.2 GHz to 2.5 GHz. When w4 = 3 mm, the resonance at f2 and fs2 do not change, but f1 increases to 2.4 GHz. The widest lower bandwidth from 2.2 GHz to 2.6 GHz is obtained. When w4 = 4 mm, f1 increases to 2.45 GHz. And the lower operation bandwidth is from 2.3 GHz to 2.6 GHz.The antenna is reduced in size by reducing the width of the ground planew5. In Figure 6, the effect of w5 on the |S11| is shown. With the decrease of w5, the electrical size of the ground plane reduced, which gives rise to a narrow bandwidth. When w5 = 32 mm, the dual operation bands with bandwidths of 16.6% from 2.2 GHz to 2.6 GHz and 19.2% from 4.95 GHz to 6 GHz for |S11| < −10 dB are achieved. When w5 = 29 mm, the bandwidth is 16% from 2.25 GHz to 2.64 GHz and 18.2% from 5 GHz to 6 GHz, respectively. When w5 = 26 mm, the bandwidths narrowed further. In addition, a further reduction of w5 would make the width of ground plane less than the length of the SIR dipole element, which leads to a decrease in unidirectional radiation and a decrease in antenna gain. From the above, we choose w5 = 29 mm as the width of the proposed antenna.


## 2.1. Antenna Geometry

The proposed antenna is shown in Figure1. The CSRR-SIW is the same as that in [15]. The difference is that the main element is SIR, which can achieve a dual operation bands which consists of a fundamental frequency f1 and a second harmonic frequency fs2. The CSRRs and two branches of the SIR element are etched on the top and bottom metal surfaces of the substrate. The substrate is Rogers 5880. The thickness of 0.504 mm and a dielectric constant of 2.2. Table 1 shows the dimensions of the proposed antenna.Figure 1
Geometry of the proposed antenna. (a) Top and (b) bottom.
(a)(b)Table 1
The structure parameters of antenna (units: mm).
Dimensionsw1w2w3w4w5dθl1l2l3l4rirogValue1.5581.553290.120°598.7341.62.40.5


## 2.2. Dual-Band Working Mechanism

To obtain a dual-band working, we use the SIR as the main radiating element. For the SIR, the impedance of the narrow and wider strip isZ1 and Z2, and the corresponding lengths is θ1 and θ2, respectively. The resonance condition can be described as follows:(1)tanθ1⋅tanθ2=Rz,where impedance ratio Rz is(2)Rz=Z2Z1.To get a compact size, the electrical lengthsθ1 and θ2 are given in [16] as(3)θ1=θ2=arctanRz.On this premise, the relationship between the second harmonic frequencyfs2 and fundamental frequency f1 is given by(4)fs2f1=π2arctanRz.In this case, the appropriate resonant frequenciesfs2 and f1 can be designed by adjusting the impedance ratio Rz. Compared with the UIR elements in [2], the SIR element has great degree of freedom in structure and design.In this paper, we designedf1 and fs2 as 2.4 GHz and 5.7 GHz, respectively. Substituting fs2 and f1 into (4), we obtain Rz is about 0.6. Then, substituting Rz into (3), we obtain θ1 = θ2 = 37.8°. Then, we get the parameters of the SIR l2, l3, w3, and w4, as shown in Table 1.In Figure2, the current distribution over the antenna at 2.4 GHz, 5.2 GHz, and 5.7 GHz are shown. We observed from Figures 2(a) and 2(c) that the current is concentrated in the SIR element at f1 = 2.4 GHz and fs2 = 5.7 GHz. From Figure 2(b), the current is concentrated in the CSRRs at 5.2 GHz. That is to say, the SIR element produces a fundamental frequency f1 at 2.4 GHz and a second harmonic frequency fs2 at 5.7 GHz. Meanwhile, the CSRRs produces a resonant frequency at high-frequency band around 5.2 GHz.Figure 2
The current distribution at different frequencies over the antenna: (a) 2.4 GHz, (b) 5.2 GHz, and (c) 5.7 GHz.
(a)(b)(c)Figure3 shows the simulated |S11| of the proposed SIR dual-band antenna. In Figure 3, there are three resonant frequencies at f1 = 2.4 GHz, f2 = 5.2 GHz, and fs2 = 5.7 GHz. The circumference of the CSRR resonant ring is approximately λ/4 (λ is the wavelength at f2 = 5.2 GHz). By adjusting the structure parameters, f2 and fs2 can be combined with each other. The high-frequency bandwidth can then be broadened. In this case, a dual-band dipole antenna based on CSRR-SIW can be obtained.Figure 3
The simulated |S11| for the proposed antennas.


## 2.3. Parametric Analysis

A parametric study of key parameters based on CST MWS is given to assist with the design procedure. The results show that the length of the SIR elementl2 and l3, the width of the wider strip w4, and the width of the ground plane w5 are the key parameters that affects antenna performance. Figures 4–6 show the results.Figure 4
The simulated |S11| for different l2.Figure 5
The simulated |S11| for different w4.Figure 6
The simulated |S11| for different w5.In Figure4, the effect of l2 on the |S11| is shown. We observed that l2 mainly affects the resonance at fundamental frequency f1 and the second harmonic frequency fs2. With the increase of l2, the effective electrical length θ1 of the narrow strip and the whole electrical length of the SIR element increases. Therefore, the fundamental frequency f1 and the second harmonic frequency fs2 decrease with the increasing of l2, as shown in Figure 4. In Figure 4, when l2 = 7 mm, there are three resonant frequencies: f1 = 2.6 GHz, f2 = 5.2 GHz, and fs2 = 5.9 GHz. The lower operation bandwidth is from 2.4 GHz to 2.75 GHz. When l2 = 8 mm, the resonance at f2 do not change, but f1 and fs2 decrease to 2.47 GHz and 5.8 GHz, respectively. The lower operation bandwidth is from 2.3 GHz to 2.65 GHz. When l2 = 9 mm, f1 and fs2 decreases to 2.4 GHz and 5.7 GHz, respectively. The widest lower operation bandwidth of 16.6% from 2.2 GHz to 2.6 GHz is obtained. The higher operation bandwidth is from 4.9 GHz to 6 GHz.In Figure5, the effect of w4 on the |S11| is shown. We observed that w4 mainly affects the resonance at fundamental frequency f1 near about 2.4 GHz. With the increase of w4, the impedance ratio Rz of the SIR element decreases. And then the whole electrical length of the SIR decreases according to (1). Therefore, the fundamental frequency f1 increases with the increasing of w4, as shown in Figure 5. The effective electrical length θ1 of the narrow strip of the SIR element has no change, and then the second harmonic frequency fs2 almost has no change. In Figure 5, when w4 = 2 mm, there are three resonant frequencies: f1 = 2.35 GHz, f2 = 5.2 GHz, and fs2 = 5.7 GHz. The lower operation bandwidth is from 2.2 GHz to 2.5 GHz. When w4 = 3 mm, the resonance at f2 and fs2 do not change, but f1 increases to 2.4 GHz. The widest lower bandwidth from 2.2 GHz to 2.6 GHz is obtained. When w4 = 4 mm, f1 increases to 2.45 GHz. And the lower operation bandwidth is from 2.3 GHz to 2.6 GHz.The antenna is reduced in size by reducing the width of the ground planew5. In Figure 6, the effect of w5 on the |S11| is shown. With the decrease of w5, the electrical size of the ground plane reduced, which gives rise to a narrow bandwidth. When w5 = 32 mm, the dual operation bands with bandwidths of 16.6% from 2.2 GHz to 2.6 GHz and 19.2% from 4.95 GHz to 6 GHz for |S11| < −10 dB are achieved. When w5 = 29 mm, the bandwidth is 16% from 2.25 GHz to 2.64 GHz and 18.2% from 5 GHz to 6 GHz, respectively. When w5 = 26 mm, the bandwidths narrowed further. In addition, a further reduction of w5 would make the width of ground plane less than the length of the SIR dipole element, which leads to a decrease in unidirectional radiation and a decrease in antenna gain. From the above, we choose w5 = 29 mm as the width of the proposed antenna.


## 3. The Effect of Parameterθ

The two branches of the SIR element are connected by the inclined feed lines on both sides of the CSRR-SIW dual-band antenna. In this section, the effect of the tilt angleθ on gain enhancement of the dual-band CSRR-SIW SIR antenna is discussed. Figure 7 shows the E-field distribution over the antenna for different θ, which clearly demonstrates that the E-field intensity increases significantly when θ = 20°, whether at 2.4 GHz or 5.5 GHz.Figure 7
The E-field distribution over the antenna: (a)θ = 0° at 2.4 GHz, (b) θ = 20° at 2.4 GHz, (c) θ = 0° at 5.5 GHz, and (d) θ = 20° at 5.5 GHz.
(a)(b)(c)(d)Figure8 shows the effect of tilt angle θ on the peak antenna gain. With the increase of θ from 0° to 20°, the peak gain increases, which is equivalent to enlargement of the antenna aperture [17]. A tilt angle of θ = 20° is observed to provide an optimum gain performance. Over the lower frequency band of 2.25 GHz–2.64 GHz, the gain varies between 6.5 dBi–7 dBi, which corresponds to a gain enhancement of 1.2 dB–1.4 dB compared with the antenna with 0° tilt angle.Figure 8
The simulated gain for differentθ.Over the higher frequency band of 5.03 GHz–6 GHz, the gain varies between 7.0 dBi–7.7 dBi, which corresponds to a gain enhancement of 1.7 dB–1.9 dB compared with the antenna with 0° tilt angle.The radiation patterns of the antenna with feed line tilted by 20° and 0° at 2.4 GHz and 5.5 GHz are shown in Figure9. The effective aperture increases with the parameter θ, which leads to lower side-lobe level and front-to-back ratio [18]. We observed that, with the feed line tilted by 20°, there is a distinct improvement in the side-lobe level; however, there is degradation in the back-lobe level, especially in E-plane. From Figure 9(a), the back-lobe level is about −20.3 dB and −12.2 dB, when θ = 0° and 20° at 2.4 GHz, respectively. From Figure 9(c), the back-lobe level is about −10.7 dB and −8.2 dB, when θ = 0° and 20° at 5.5 GHz, respectively.Figure 9
Simulated radiation patterns with the feed line tilted by 20° and 0°: (a) 2.4 GHz, E-plane, (b) 2.4 GHz, H-plane, (c) 5.5 GHz, E-plane, and (d) 5.5 GHz, H-plane.
(a)(b)(c)(d)In addition, from Figures7(a) and 7(b), the E-field is mainly concentrated in the SIR element at 2.4 GHz, but there is also a part of E-field distribution around the CSRRs and the intervals among the CSRRs. Moreover, the CSRRs are etched side-by-side on the top and bottom metal surfaces of the substrate, with the complementary gaps facing toward opposite directions. Therefore, there are certain phase difference in the E-field distribution around here. Therefore, even at 2.4 GHz, the maximum radiation patterns of E-plane have a deviation of less than 8, shown in Figure 9(a). From Figures 7(c) and 7(d), the CSRRs are similar to a slot array, and each CSRR has certain phase difference at 5.5 GHz. Therefore, the maximum radiation patterns of E-plane deviate a certain angle, as shown in Figure 9(c).


## 4. The Measured Results and Discussion

The realized antenna is shown in Figure10. The network analyzer Agilent N5230C is used to measure the magnitude of |S11|. The simulated and measured |S11| are shown in Figure 11. We observed that the lower operation band is 16% from 2.25 GHz to 2.64 GHz, and the higher operation band is 18.2% from 5 GHz to 6 GHz. The measured result agrees well with the simulated one.Figure 10
The photo of the antenna. (a) Top and (b) bottom.
(a)(b)Figure 11
Simulated and measured S-parameters.Figure12 shows the anechoic chamber and the testing system for antenna radiation pattern. Figure 13 shows the normalized radiation patterns. The measured result agrees well with the simulated one. Figure 14 shows the measured gain and radiation efficiency of the dual-band CSRR-SIW antenna. We observed that the gain within the operating frequency range is flat. Maximum gain of the antenna is found to be 7 dBi for the lower operation band and 7.7 dBi for higher operation band. Also, the radiation efficiency is higher than 82% for the dual operation bands.Figure 12
Photograph of the antenna measurement set-up.Figure 13
Simulated and measured radiation patterns: (a) 2.4 GHz, E-plane, (b) 2.4 GHz, H-plane, (c) 5.5 GHz, E-plane, and (d) 5.5 GHz, H-plane.
(a)(b)(c)(d)Figure 14
Measured and simulated gain and radiation efficiency for the proposed antenna.The performances of the proposed dual-band SIR antenna with the previously reported dual-band or multifrequency antennas are compared, and the results are listed in Table2. The proposed antenna achieves comparable bandwidth performance and larger gain per unit area with a relatively smaller size. Moreover, the simple structure renders that the proposed antenna has the advantage of easy-processable and cost-effective implementation.Table 2
Comparison to reported dual-band or multifrequency antenna and arrays.
Ref.Bandwidth (low-/high-band)Elements no.Dimension (λ0)Gain (low-/high-band) (dBi)[2]7.8%/30.1%/12.5%Single0.35 × 0.352.3/2.8/4.1[7]10.6%/16.6%3 × 21.1 × 1.8314.3/16.2[8]14.9%/13.2%2 × 43.35 × 0.9812.1/12.4[9]9.3%/4.3%4 × 42.83 × 1.7313.2/17.2[10]12%/10.5%Single0.3 × 0.334.5/7[11]4.18%/12.2%Single0.53 × 0.410.5/2.3[12]17%/8.25%Singlen.a.4.5/6.8This work16%/18.2%Single0.23 × 0.347/7.7


## 5. Conclusion

A dual-band SIR antenna based on metamaterial-inspired CSRR-SIW was proposed. The SIR element produces a fundamental frequencyf1 at 2.4 GHz and a second harmonic frequency fs2 at 5.7 GHz. Meanwhile, the CSRRs produces a resonant frequency at high-frequency band around 5.2 GHz, which can be combined with the second harmonic frequency fs2. The fabricated antenna provided a dual operation bands with bandwidths of 16% from 2.25 GHz to 2.64 GHz and 18.2% from 5 GHz to 6 GHz for |S11| < −10 dB. The maximum gains of 7 dBi and 7.7 dBi for the lower and higher operation bands were obtained, respectively. The proposed antenna achieved comparable bandwidth performance and larger gain per unit area with a relatively smaller size. In addition, the proposed antenna has the advantage of cost-effective implementation thanks to the simple structure.



---

*Source: 8725192-2020-07-29.xml*