# Cost Analysis of Precast and Cast-in-Place Concrete Construction for Selected Public Buildings in Ghana

Authors: Richard Oduro Asamoah; John Solomon Ankrah; Kofi Offei-Nyako; Ernest Osei Tutu
Journal: Journal of Construction Engineering
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

The construction industry in Ghana is becoming efficient in the area of cost and achieving advance technologies. The effective management of cost enables clients, developers, and facilitators to achieve value for money. Concrete is a major component in every construction project. The use of precast concrete technology has been embraced by the construction industry in Ghana. This study seeks to analyze cost estimating of the structural frame (column and slab) by considering cast-in-place and precast concrete slabs and columns, respectively. Relative importance and Kendall’s concordance agreement were used to determine the rankings and agreement of advantages of using precast concrete. The study established that precast concrete slabs were on average 23.22% cheaper than the cast-in-place concrete elements and precast columns were averagely 21.4% less than cast-in-place concrete columns. The study established that professionals prefer the use of precast concrete products because of the life cycle cost.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Concrete material is the most widely used construction material on earth which comprises about 60% of the built environment in many developed countries [1]. Concrete has shaped civilization from as far back as the ancient Egypt and the Roman Empires and it is indispensable in the development of infrastructure, industry, and housing. Without concrete the built environment would fail to accommodate our modern and demanding lifestyle [1]. For concrete the basic building materials provide strength, durability, and even elegance far in excess of many of its manufactured competitors [2]. Concrete has a wider range of uses in the construction of commercial buildings, roads, harbours, dams, bridges, electric poles, residential buildings, retaining walls, reservoirs, septic tanks, canals, and a whole lot more [3]. The durability of concrete is of vital importance regarding the life cycle cost of the structure, which includes not only the initial cost of the material and labour but also the cost of maintenance and repair [4]. The durability of concrete is therefore defined as its ability to resist weathering action, chemical attack, abrasion, and other forms of deterioration [5]. Concrete has much higher level of fire resistance than other building materials. It is not combustible and would not produce smoke or fuel the fire [6]. Concrete product can be either precast or in situ concrete. This study seeks to analyze the elemental cost comparison of precast and cast-in-place slabs and columns of some selected public projects in Ghana. The construction industry in Ghana is not familiar to the use of precast technology for beams, walls, foundations, and so forth and the precast columns and slabs are the most common in the Ghanaian construction industry.


## 2. Literature Review

Concrete is a mixture of cement, fine aggregate, coarse aggregate, and water. Concrete must meet the required standard of strength and durability [7]. In Ghana, the use of concrete and reinforced concrete for construction purposes is very common. There are many types of concrete designed to suit a variety of purposes coupled with a range of compositions, finishes, and performance characteristics [8]. This study focuses on the precast and in situ concrete. Precast is defined as a concept that uses standardized structural components produced away from the construction site and the components are transported to the site for assembly [9, 10]. These components are manufactured by industrial methods based on mass production in order to build a large number of buildings in a short time at low cost [11].The use of precast concrete has various advantages which include the reduction of the site labours, less wastage, less volume of building materials, and increased environmental and construction site cleanliness. The use of precast products also provides safety at construction site and reduces time of completion in construction [12]. Figure 1 shows how easy it is to fix fun hock and steel ceiling noggins. All these indirectly signify that the precast concrete is much more economical, though the construction cost involves all matters either initially or throughout the building’s life [13]. Most concrete buildings are cast-in-place; the wet mix is deposited and formed at the place where the finished concrete is desired, generally referred to as site cast concrete, since the location is usually at a building site [14]. Precast concrete is defined as the process of casting of concrete elements off-site and move them to the actual building site. Concrete for site cast construction is typically brought to the site by concrete, transporting mixer trucks with the large rotating barrels [15]. The mix is prepared at a central batching plant, where controls of the materials may be carefully monitored. However, the transporting to the site, proper mixing in truck, discharging from the truck and depositing in the forms, and handling for placement, finishing, and curing are all subject to the level of responsibility and craft exercised by the people involved [16]. Site conditions in terms of accessibility and weather can be highly critical to the work, requiring extreme measure in some situations to control all the stages in the production process [17]. An element is defined as a part of the building or service which performs the same function in its purest form [18]. One of the most effective tools that Quantity Surveyors use in the planning and design process is the elemental cost plan. Cost of any project is influenced by project location, type of design, size of the building, date of tender, and prevailing market conditions [19]. Elemental cost analysis is the study of costs to client which is given to tenders to determine the probable cost of each element of a building. The purpose of elemental cost is to show the distribution of the cost of a building among its elements in a meaningful term to both clients and design team and by so doing allow the cost of two or more buildings to be compared. However there are other factors that affect elemental cost and these are quantity, quality, and price levels [20]. The theory behind the analysis of building costs per element is that the total cost is a sum of the cost of individual elements such as walls, roofs, foundations, structural frame, sprinkler systems, and lighting [21]. Elements usually perform a given function, regardless of the design specification, construction method, or materials used in the construction of the building. For better tool for analysis elemental cost estimating formats were developed [22]. Elemental cost estimating is one of the methods of approximate estimating which gives a simple and quick quantification of buildings but the method requires significant expertise and judgment in their pricing. This method analyzes the cost of the project on an element by element basis [23]. The study seeks to analyze the comparative cost of structural frame of some selected public buildings in Ghana. The structural frame will include columns and suspended slabs. The precast columns and suspended slabs are mostly used in Ghana. This will inform policy maker in the construction industry on the sensibility of their relation to concrete and infrastructure developments.Figure 1
Soffit of precast suspended slab showing fun hock and steel ceiling noggins.


## 3. Methodology

The study was a case study of some selected public institutions, which were supervised by CSIR-Building and Road Research Institute. The analysis was based on actual working drawings and bills of quantities of completed and on-going projects. The information for the research was obtained mainly from books, interpersonal interviews, and actual site measurements. Various techniques were adopted to come up with the costs of the structural components being studied. Table1 shows a list of 13 selected projects which were used for the analysis of the cost of suspended floor slab and column.Table 1
List of selected projects.
Item Some selected public projects Status 1 Construction of 8-unit staff bungalow for ST. Joseph College of Education On-going 2 Construction of 2-storey administration block for Mampong Technical College of Education On-going 3 Construction of 8-unit staff bungalow and 2 No. 12-seater WC toilet facility for Berekum College of Education On-going 4 Construction of auditorium block for ST. Monica’s College of Education, Mampong On-going 5 Construction of 3-storey classroom block for Tanoso Community Health Nurses Training School On-going 6 Completion of 3-storey administration block for Asunafo South District Assembly On-going 7 Construction of new administration block for CSIR-BRRI On-going 8 Construction of 2-storey dormitory block for Effiduase Secondary/Commercial School Completed 9 Construction of 3-storey 12-unit flat for Effiduase Secondary/Commercial School Completed 10 Construction of the extension of head office block for Minerals Commission, Accra, Ghana Completed 11 Construction of auditorium for Sunyani Polytechnic Completed 12 Construction of 18-unit 3-storey model school for Ejisu-Juaben District Completed 13 Construction of new assembly hall for Effiduase Secondary/Commercial School CompletedThe projects were in Ashanti, Greater Accra, and Brong Ahafo regions of Ghana; 7 of the projects were on-going projects, and 6 were completed. Relative Important Index (RII) was used to rank the advantages of using precast concrete from the professionals who were involved in all the selected projects. The RII value indicates the relative significance or importance of one factor compared to other variables in the same category. The RII was calculated using the formula(1)Relative Important Index (RII)=∑WAN,where W is the weights given to each variable by the respondents, ranging from 1 to 5, A is the highest weight (i.e., 5 in the study), and N is the total number of samples.


## 4. Results and Discussions

### 4.1. Cost Comparative Analysis between Cast-in-Place and Precast Suspended Floor Slabs

The main aim of the study was to analyze the cost comparison between cast-in-place and precast concrete of some 13 public buildings in Ghana as indicated in Table1. The study focused on suspended slabs and columns. The construction industry in Ghana is not familiar with the use of other precast elements like beams, walls, foundations, and so forth, with the exception of precast columns and prestressed beams; it is very challenging to get other precast elements. All the selected projects had a concrete mix proportion of 1 : 2 : 4 ratio for both cast-in-place and precast concrete. All columns had 6 numbers of 16 mm diameter bars at a height of 3 metres, a column width of 450 mm (the concrete mix proportion is based on weight, use of 4 pounds of coarse aggregate and 2 pounds of sand for every pound of cement). Precast concrete columns were reinforced with 6 numbers of 16 mm diameter bars 10 mm; stirrups at 200 mm centres. The analysis for the selected projects was for ground floor columns and first floor suspended slabs. The projects were from 2005 to 2016. Table 2 shows the summary of cost and percentage changes for both cast-in-place and precast suspended concrete floor slabs. Table 2 revealed that, depending on the project size, design considerations, and other related factors, all the projects indicated reduction in cost for the precast concrete suspended slab as compared to the cast-in-place concrete. The highest percent reduction was 35.14% (construction of new assembly hall for Effiduase Secondary/Commercial School) and the lowest was the construction of auditorium block for St. Monica’s College of Education with a percentage reduction of 13.5%. The study revealed an average percentage reduction of 23.22%. The study analyzed the cost comparison between the precast and the cast-in-place concrete using elemental cost analysis of slabs for the 13 selected projects.Table 2
Cost comparison between cast-in-place and precast suspended floor slabs.
Item Some selected public projects Cost comparison between cast-in-place and precast suspended floor slabs In situ concrete Gh ¢(A) Precast concrete Gh ¢(B) Difference Gh ¢(C=A-B) Percentage change (%) 1 Construction of 8-unit staff bungalow for ST. Joseph College of Education 129,200.00 102,068.00 27,132.00 21.00 2 Construction of 2-storey administration block for Mampong Technical College of Education 134,902.00 114,666.70 20,235.3 15.00 3 Construction of 8-unit staff bungalow and 2 No. 12-seater WC toilet facility for Berekum College of Education 125,920.00 113,579.84 21,340.16 9.80 4 Construction of auditorium block for ST. Monica’s College of Education, Mampong 217,730.00 188,336.45 29,393.55 13.50 5 Construction of 3-storey classroom block for Tanoso Community Health Nurses Training School 85,922 69,407.79 16,514.21 19.22 6 Completion of 3 storey administration block for Asunafo South District Assembly 49,432.90 7,414.94 42,017.00 15.00 7 Construction of new administration block for CSIR-BRRI 125,500.00 98,517.50 26,982.50 21.50 8 Construction of 2-storey dormitory block for Effiduase Secondary/Commercial School 51,292.43 34,878.85 16,413.58 32.00 9 Construction of 3-storey 12-unit flat for Effiduase Secondary/Commercial School 124,801.00 97,344.75 27,456.22 33.00 10 Construction of the extension of head office block for Minerals Commission, Accra, Ghana 64,878.26 53,400.00 11,478.26 17.70 11 Construction of auditorium for Sunyani Polytechnic 27,965.18 18,736.67 9,228.51 29.66 12 Construction of 18-unit 3-storey model school for Ejisu-Juaben District 75,185.51 52,629.86 22,555.65 30.00 13 Construction of new assembly hall for Effiduase Secondary/Commercial School 22,224.60 15,334.97 6,889.63 35.14


### 4.2. Cost Comparative Analysis between Cast-in-Place and Precast Columns

Table3 revealed that precast concrete columns were on average 21.4% cheaper than cast-in-place columns. The highest reduction was 24.5% and the lowest was 18.33%. In Ghana, precast columns are sold in hollow forms, and the cost of a column depends on the specifications and the type as shown in Figure 2. The main cost variations between cast-in-place and precast columns were the reduction in labour, formwork, and reduction in volume of concrete.Table 3
Cost analysis of cast-in-place and precast concrete columns.
Item Some selected public projects Cost comparison between cast-in-place and precast columns Cast-in-place concrete Gh ¢(A) Precast concrete Gh ¢(B) Difference Gh ¢(C=A-B) Percentage change (%) 1 Construction of 8-unit staff bungalow for ST. Joseph College of Education 41,800.00 33,628.10 8,171.90 19.55 2 Construction of 2-storey administration block for Mampong Technical College of Education 17,100 13,457.70 3,642.30 21.30 3 Construction of 8-unit staff bungalow and 2 No. 12-seater WC toilet facility for Berekum College of Education 4,180.00 3,413.81 766.19 18.33 4 Construction of auditorium block for ST. Monica’s College of Education, Mampong 68,750.00 54,848.75 13,901.25 20.22 5 Construction of 3-storey classroom block for Tanoso Community Health Nurses Training School 22,530.00 17,686.05 4,843.95 21.5 6 Completion of 3-storey administration block for Asunafo South District Assembly 10,169.30 7,932.05 2,237.25 22.00 7 Construction of new administration block for CSIR-BRRI 12,336.00 9,622.08 2,713.92 22.00 8 Construction of 2-storey dormitory block for Effiduase Secondary/Commercial School 92,331.80 71,095.49 21,236.31 23.00 9 Construction of 3-storey 12-unit flat for Effiduase Secondary/Commercial School 62,548.00 50,526.27 12,021.73 19.22 10 Construction of the extension of head office block for Minerals Commission, Accra, Ghana 17,915.25 13,526.01 4,389.24 24.50 11 Construction of auditorium for Sunyani Polytechnic 18,403.85 14,170.96 4,232.89 23.00 12 Construction of 18-unit 3-storey model school for Ejisu-Juaben District 36,670.78 28,603.28 8,067.59 22.00 13 Construction of new assembly hall for Effiduase Secondary/Commercial School 7,810.35 6,092.07 1,718.28 22.00Figure 2
Types of precast hollow column.


### 4.3. Comparison of Cast-in-Place and Precast Concrete

The major variations for cost comparison between cast-in-place and precast occur in the cost of formwork, reinforcement, cost of workmanship, and concrete in slabs and columns. Table4 shows the processes of constructing cast-in-place floor slabs which require formwork for the soffit of slab, formwork for beams, laying reinforcement in slabs, pouring, vibrating concrete, and tampering concrete in place, and all these activities also require workforce and level of precision. But the use of precast will require transporting and assembling of prestressed beams and hollow blocks which requires accuracy. The precast prestressed beams and hollow blocks are self-supported and do not need much formwork as in the case of cast-in-place concrete except for some skeletal props to support the floor when spreading the concrete topping. The reinforcement in precast floor is small as compared to cast-in-place concrete, where reinforcement is required for beams and the slab; hence, the cost is small as compared to cast-in-place floor slab. Precast beams and hollow blocks arrangement serves as the horizontal plate as shown in Figure 1. The concrete in the cast-in-place floor slab is 150 mm thick while that in the precast is 50 mm used as topping for the beam and blocks system to even out the surface. The volume of concrete used is one-third of that used in cast-in-place. The number of workforce required for the processes in cast-in-place concrete is more as compared to precast. Also precast columns serve as formwork; therefore formwork will not be required. Table 4 shows the summary of cost break down of selected projects. The cost breakdown for both cast-in-place and precast includes all labour components. Except project 10 (construction of the extension of head office block for Minerals Commission, Accra, Ghana) where the floor slab was reinforced with additional 10 mm diameter bars all others were not reinforced. Data were obtained from bills of quantities and actual site visit measurement of respective projects. The precast concrete cost includes transportation and assembling on site.Table 4
Cost breakdown of on situ and precast suspended floor slab.
INSITU PRECAST Projects Concrete (a) Reinforcement (b) Formwork (c) Totald=a+b+c Concrete (e) Reinforcement (f) Formwork (g) Totalh=e+f+g 1 50,258.70 56,848.00 22,093.3 129,200 84,614.29 — 17,453.00 102,067.29 2 80,258.70 47,215.70 6,745.10 102,068.00 109,338.07 — 5,328.63 114,666.70 3 84,941.20 35,257.60 6,296.00 125,920.00 108,606.00 — 4,973.84 113,579.84 4 141,524.50 82,737.40 6,531.90 217,730.00 183,176.25 — 5,160.20 188,336.45 5 34,300.00 36,904.00 14,718.00 85,922.00 57,677.87 — 11,729.92 69,407.39 6 19,800.00 15,717.90 13,915.00 49,432.00 34,916.13 — 7,100.87 42,017.00 7 74,654.80 41,329.20 9,516.00 125,500.00 81,868.04 — 16,649.46 98,517.50 8 98,465.00 70,031.50 25,235.00 193,731.50 28,984.32 — 5,894.53 34,878.85 9 72,063.00 33,803.00 18,935.00 124,801.00 80,893.49 — 16,451.26 97,344.75 10 43,727.95 10,185.89 10,964.43 64,878.26 36,000.00 8,400.00 9,000.00 53,400.00 11 18,177.37 7,830.25 1,957.55 27,965.18 15,570.17 — 3,166.50 18,736.67 12 47,366.55 21,051.94 6,767.00 75,185.00 43,735.41 — 8,894.44 52,629.86 13 13,334.76 6000.64 2,889.20 22,224.60 12,743.36 — 2,591.60 15,334.97


### 4.4. Determining Degree of Agreement on the Advantages of Using Precast Concrete among Building Professionals

The study also sought the opinions of building professionals (Civil Engineers, Quantity Surveyors, and Architects) who worked on the selected projects about the advantages of using precast concrete. Table5 revealed the views from the professionals. Using Relative Important Index, Table 5 revealed that professionals consider low life cycle cost the main advantage of using precast concrete products and space for acoustic insulation as the least.Table 5
Professionals opinions on using precast concrete product.
Number Advantages Rating Total ∑ W Mean RII Rank 1 2 3 4 5 1 Low life cycle cost 0 0 2 42 34 78 344 4.4103 0.882 1 2 Reduction of on-site waste 0 0 2 50 26 78 336 4.3077 0.862 2 3 Speed of construction 0 2 6 46 24 78 326 4.1795 0.836 3 4 Quality 2 0 10 54 12 78 308 3.9487 0.79 4 5 Durability 0 2 16 48 12 78 304 3.8974 0.779 5 6 Dimensional accuracy 0 16 14 28 20 78 286 3.6667 0.733 6 7 Reduction of on-site labour 0 14 12 48 4 78 276 3.5385 0.708 7 8 Reduction of on-site activity, noise, and disturbance 0 14 20 34 10 78 274 3.5128 0.703 8 9 Sandwich panels available for insulation 6 16 12 26 18 78 268 3.4359 0.687 9 10 Minimal maintenance 6 16 4 46 6 78 264 3.3846 0.677 10 11 Thermal inertia reduces lifetime energy costs 0 14 22 42 0 78 262 3.359 0.672 11 12 Large spans available from prestressing 6 26 4 34 8 78 246 3.1538 0.631 12 13 Tight tolerances 4 34 6 28 6 78 232 2.9744 0.595 13 14 Acoustic insulation 12 36 10 14 6 78 200 2.5641 0.513 14 Source: Field Survey, 2014.Based on the important indices, the advantages of using precast concrete were ranked and the agreement between the sampled building professionals was determined by the use of Kendall’s concordance analysis. Kendall’s concordance coefficient, which measures the degree of agreement among sets of ranking, is expressed ask:(2)W=RI-R2nn2-1/12,wherek is the number of sets of ranking (e.g., the number of judgments), n is the number of aspects of a problem or factors being ranked, R is average of the ranks assigned to the nth aspect of the problem, n(n2-1)/12 is the maximum possible squared deviation, that is, the numerator which will occur if there were perfect agreements among k sets of ranks, and the average rankings were 1,2,3,…,n. RI is the rank assigned by an individual judge to one aspect of the problem posed. The value of W ranges from 0 to 1 regardless of the number of rankings. A high value of W indicates a high degree of agreement between the set of rankings. The significance ofW was tested using chi-square distribution. The test was based on the null hypothesis H0 = thek set of rankings were unrelated and the alternative hypothesis H1 = thek set of rankings were related. The observed chi-square value is calculated using λ2=k(n-1)W, where k, n, and W are as previously defined. The critical chi-square value is read from the statistical table at (k-1) degrees of freedom. Where the calculated chi-square value exceeds the critical value (that read from tables), the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative is accepted. A high significant value of W could be interpreted as meaning that k respondents to a question are applying essentially the same standards in rating the nth aspect of a problem under study. For the purpose of interpretation of data, a rating of 1–3 was perceived to be very important, 4–7 important, 8–11 marginally important, and 12–14 not important. Table 6 shows agreement by professions on the advantages of using precast concrete(3)Grand meanRˇ=∑i=1nR1=2.36,∑R1-Rˇ2=11.34,where R1 is the mean of ranking and “n” is the number of advantages being ranked. W is coefficient of concordance, and building professionals (Quantity Surveyors, Architects, and Civil Engineers) are as follows R=RIk = groupingsW=RI-Rˇ2/[n(n2-1)/12]i=1n = number of factors ranked = 14n(n2-1)/12=14(142-1)/12=227.5W=11.34/227.5=0.050Table 6
Agreement by professionals on the advantages of using precast concrete.
Number Advantages Quantity Surveyors Architects Civil Engineers Sum of ranking (R1) Means of ranking (Rˇ) R 1 - R ˇ ( R 1 - R ˇ ) 2 Overall ranking 1 Low life cycle cost 1 2 1 4 1.33 −1.03 1.061 5 2 Reduction of on-site waste 1 1 1 3 1.00 −1.36 1.850 1 3 Speed of construction 1 1 1 3 1.00 −1.36 1.850 1 4 Quality 2 3 2 7 2.33 −0.03 0.001 13 5 Durability 2 2 3 7 2.33 −0.03 0.001 13 6 Dimensional accuracy 1 2 1 4 1.33 −1.03 1.061 5 7 Reduction of on-site labour 1 4 1 6 2.00 −0.36 0.130 12 8 Reduction of on-site activity, noise, and disturbance 3 3 2 8 2.67 0.31 0.096 10 9 Sandwich panels available for insulation 2 3 3 8 2.67 0.31 0.096 10 10 Minimal maintenance 3 3 3 9 3.00 0.64 0.410 8 11 Thermal inertia reduces lifetime energy costs 4 3 3 10 3.33 1.31 1.716 3 12 Large spans available from prestressing 3 3 3 9 3.00 0.64 0.410 8 13 Tight tolerances 4 5 2 11 3.67 1.31 1.716 3 14 Acoustic insulation 3 5 2 10 3.33 0.97 0.941 7Testing 95% significance level forW, the null hypothesis (H0 = set of ranking by Quantity Surveyors, Architects, and Civil Engineers) is unrelated. The alternative H1 are set of rankings that are related. λ2=k(n-1)W, where k is the number of groups being compared which in this case = 3 (i.e., the Quantity Surveyors, Architects, and Civil Engineers being compared). λ2=3(14-1)0.050=1.95. From the chi-square distribution tables, the critical value λ0.9552=1.95 since the observed λ2 value = 11.070 is greater than 1.95; the null hypothesis H0 is rejected; and the alternative hypothesis H1 that the set of rankings by the above groups are related is accepted. This shows that there is high degree of agreement between Quantity Surveyors, Architects, and Civil Engineers on the advantages of using precast concrete suspended slabs and columns. The Kendall’s concordance also identified reduction of on-site waste and speed of construction as the main advantages of using precast concrete.


## 4.1. Cost Comparative Analysis between Cast-in-Place and Precast Suspended Floor Slabs

The main aim of the study was to analyze the cost comparison between cast-in-place and precast concrete of some 13 public buildings in Ghana as indicated in Table1. The study focused on suspended slabs and columns. The construction industry in Ghana is not familiar with the use of other precast elements like beams, walls, foundations, and so forth, with the exception of precast columns and prestressed beams; it is very challenging to get other precast elements. All the selected projects had a concrete mix proportion of 1 : 2 : 4 ratio for both cast-in-place and precast concrete. All columns had 6 numbers of 16 mm diameter bars at a height of 3 metres, a column width of 450 mm (the concrete mix proportion is based on weight, use of 4 pounds of coarse aggregate and 2 pounds of sand for every pound of cement). Precast concrete columns were reinforced with 6 numbers of 16 mm diameter bars 10 mm; stirrups at 200 mm centres. The analysis for the selected projects was for ground floor columns and first floor suspended slabs. The projects were from 2005 to 2016. Table 2 shows the summary of cost and percentage changes for both cast-in-place and precast suspended concrete floor slabs. Table 2 revealed that, depending on the project size, design considerations, and other related factors, all the projects indicated reduction in cost for the precast concrete suspended slab as compared to the cast-in-place concrete. The highest percent reduction was 35.14% (construction of new assembly hall for Effiduase Secondary/Commercial School) and the lowest was the construction of auditorium block for St. Monica’s College of Education with a percentage reduction of 13.5%. The study revealed an average percentage reduction of 23.22%. The study analyzed the cost comparison between the precast and the cast-in-place concrete using elemental cost analysis of slabs for the 13 selected projects.Table 2
Cost comparison between cast-in-place and precast suspended floor slabs.
Item Some selected public projects Cost comparison between cast-in-place and precast suspended floor slabs In situ concrete Gh ¢(A) Precast concrete Gh ¢(B) Difference Gh ¢(C=A-B) Percentage change (%) 1 Construction of 8-unit staff bungalow for ST. Joseph College of Education 129,200.00 102,068.00 27,132.00 21.00 2 Construction of 2-storey administration block for Mampong Technical College of Education 134,902.00 114,666.70 20,235.3 15.00 3 Construction of 8-unit staff bungalow and 2 No. 12-seater WC toilet facility for Berekum College of Education 125,920.00 113,579.84 21,340.16 9.80 4 Construction of auditorium block for ST. Monica’s College of Education, Mampong 217,730.00 188,336.45 29,393.55 13.50 5 Construction of 3-storey classroom block for Tanoso Community Health Nurses Training School 85,922 69,407.79 16,514.21 19.22 6 Completion of 3 storey administration block for Asunafo South District Assembly 49,432.90 7,414.94 42,017.00 15.00 7 Construction of new administration block for CSIR-BRRI 125,500.00 98,517.50 26,982.50 21.50 8 Construction of 2-storey dormitory block for Effiduase Secondary/Commercial School 51,292.43 34,878.85 16,413.58 32.00 9 Construction of 3-storey 12-unit flat for Effiduase Secondary/Commercial School 124,801.00 97,344.75 27,456.22 33.00 10 Construction of the extension of head office block for Minerals Commission, Accra, Ghana 64,878.26 53,400.00 11,478.26 17.70 11 Construction of auditorium for Sunyani Polytechnic 27,965.18 18,736.67 9,228.51 29.66 12 Construction of 18-unit 3-storey model school for Ejisu-Juaben District 75,185.51 52,629.86 22,555.65 30.00 13 Construction of new assembly hall for Effiduase Secondary/Commercial School 22,224.60 15,334.97 6,889.63 35.14


## 4.2. Cost Comparative Analysis between Cast-in-Place and Precast Columns

Table3 revealed that precast concrete columns were on average 21.4% cheaper than cast-in-place columns. The highest reduction was 24.5% and the lowest was 18.33%. In Ghana, precast columns are sold in hollow forms, and the cost of a column depends on the specifications and the type as shown in Figure 2. The main cost variations between cast-in-place and precast columns were the reduction in labour, formwork, and reduction in volume of concrete.Table 3
Cost analysis of cast-in-place and precast concrete columns.
Item Some selected public projects Cost comparison between cast-in-place and precast columns Cast-in-place concrete Gh ¢(A) Precast concrete Gh ¢(B) Difference Gh ¢(C=A-B) Percentage change (%) 1 Construction of 8-unit staff bungalow for ST. Joseph College of Education 41,800.00 33,628.10 8,171.90 19.55 2 Construction of 2-storey administration block for Mampong Technical College of Education 17,100 13,457.70 3,642.30 21.30 3 Construction of 8-unit staff bungalow and 2 No. 12-seater WC toilet facility for Berekum College of Education 4,180.00 3,413.81 766.19 18.33 4 Construction of auditorium block for ST. Monica’s College of Education, Mampong 68,750.00 54,848.75 13,901.25 20.22 5 Construction of 3-storey classroom block for Tanoso Community Health Nurses Training School 22,530.00 17,686.05 4,843.95 21.5 6 Completion of 3-storey administration block for Asunafo South District Assembly 10,169.30 7,932.05 2,237.25 22.00 7 Construction of new administration block for CSIR-BRRI 12,336.00 9,622.08 2,713.92 22.00 8 Construction of 2-storey dormitory block for Effiduase Secondary/Commercial School 92,331.80 71,095.49 21,236.31 23.00 9 Construction of 3-storey 12-unit flat for Effiduase Secondary/Commercial School 62,548.00 50,526.27 12,021.73 19.22 10 Construction of the extension of head office block for Minerals Commission, Accra, Ghana 17,915.25 13,526.01 4,389.24 24.50 11 Construction of auditorium for Sunyani Polytechnic 18,403.85 14,170.96 4,232.89 23.00 12 Construction of 18-unit 3-storey model school for Ejisu-Juaben District 36,670.78 28,603.28 8,067.59 22.00 13 Construction of new assembly hall for Effiduase Secondary/Commercial School 7,810.35 6,092.07 1,718.28 22.00Figure 2
Types of precast hollow column.


## 4.3. Comparison of Cast-in-Place and Precast Concrete

The major variations for cost comparison between cast-in-place and precast occur in the cost of formwork, reinforcement, cost of workmanship, and concrete in slabs and columns. Table4 shows the processes of constructing cast-in-place floor slabs which require formwork for the soffit of slab, formwork for beams, laying reinforcement in slabs, pouring, vibrating concrete, and tampering concrete in place, and all these activities also require workforce and level of precision. But the use of precast will require transporting and assembling of prestressed beams and hollow blocks which requires accuracy. The precast prestressed beams and hollow blocks are self-supported and do not need much formwork as in the case of cast-in-place concrete except for some skeletal props to support the floor when spreading the concrete topping. The reinforcement in precast floor is small as compared to cast-in-place concrete, where reinforcement is required for beams and the slab; hence, the cost is small as compared to cast-in-place floor slab. Precast beams and hollow blocks arrangement serves as the horizontal plate as shown in Figure 1. The concrete in the cast-in-place floor slab is 150 mm thick while that in the precast is 50 mm used as topping for the beam and blocks system to even out the surface. The volume of concrete used is one-third of that used in cast-in-place. The number of workforce required for the processes in cast-in-place concrete is more as compared to precast. Also precast columns serve as formwork; therefore formwork will not be required. Table 4 shows the summary of cost break down of selected projects. The cost breakdown for both cast-in-place and precast includes all labour components. Except project 10 (construction of the extension of head office block for Minerals Commission, Accra, Ghana) where the floor slab was reinforced with additional 10 mm diameter bars all others were not reinforced. Data were obtained from bills of quantities and actual site visit measurement of respective projects. The precast concrete cost includes transportation and assembling on site.Table 4
Cost breakdown of on situ and precast suspended floor slab.
INSITU PRECAST Projects Concrete (a) Reinforcement (b) Formwork (c) Totald=a+b+c Concrete (e) Reinforcement (f) Formwork (g) Totalh=e+f+g 1 50,258.70 56,848.00 22,093.3 129,200 84,614.29 — 17,453.00 102,067.29 2 80,258.70 47,215.70 6,745.10 102,068.00 109,338.07 — 5,328.63 114,666.70 3 84,941.20 35,257.60 6,296.00 125,920.00 108,606.00 — 4,973.84 113,579.84 4 141,524.50 82,737.40 6,531.90 217,730.00 183,176.25 — 5,160.20 188,336.45 5 34,300.00 36,904.00 14,718.00 85,922.00 57,677.87 — 11,729.92 69,407.39 6 19,800.00 15,717.90 13,915.00 49,432.00 34,916.13 — 7,100.87 42,017.00 7 74,654.80 41,329.20 9,516.00 125,500.00 81,868.04 — 16,649.46 98,517.50 8 98,465.00 70,031.50 25,235.00 193,731.50 28,984.32 — 5,894.53 34,878.85 9 72,063.00 33,803.00 18,935.00 124,801.00 80,893.49 — 16,451.26 97,344.75 10 43,727.95 10,185.89 10,964.43 64,878.26 36,000.00 8,400.00 9,000.00 53,400.00 11 18,177.37 7,830.25 1,957.55 27,965.18 15,570.17 — 3,166.50 18,736.67 12 47,366.55 21,051.94 6,767.00 75,185.00 43,735.41 — 8,894.44 52,629.86 13 13,334.76 6000.64 2,889.20 22,224.60 12,743.36 — 2,591.60 15,334.97


## 4.4. Determining Degree of Agreement on the Advantages of Using Precast Concrete among Building Professionals

The study also sought the opinions of building professionals (Civil Engineers, Quantity Surveyors, and Architects) who worked on the selected projects about the advantages of using precast concrete. Table5 revealed the views from the professionals. Using Relative Important Index, Table 5 revealed that professionals consider low life cycle cost the main advantage of using precast concrete products and space for acoustic insulation as the least.Table 5
Professionals opinions on using precast concrete product.
Number Advantages Rating Total ∑ W Mean RII Rank 1 2 3 4 5 1 Low life cycle cost 0 0 2 42 34 78 344 4.4103 0.882 1 2 Reduction of on-site waste 0 0 2 50 26 78 336 4.3077 0.862 2 3 Speed of construction 0 2 6 46 24 78 326 4.1795 0.836 3 4 Quality 2 0 10 54 12 78 308 3.9487 0.79 4 5 Durability 0 2 16 48 12 78 304 3.8974 0.779 5 6 Dimensional accuracy 0 16 14 28 20 78 286 3.6667 0.733 6 7 Reduction of on-site labour 0 14 12 48 4 78 276 3.5385 0.708 7 8 Reduction of on-site activity, noise, and disturbance 0 14 20 34 10 78 274 3.5128 0.703 8 9 Sandwich panels available for insulation 6 16 12 26 18 78 268 3.4359 0.687 9 10 Minimal maintenance 6 16 4 46 6 78 264 3.3846 0.677 10 11 Thermal inertia reduces lifetime energy costs 0 14 22 42 0 78 262 3.359 0.672 11 12 Large spans available from prestressing 6 26 4 34 8 78 246 3.1538 0.631 12 13 Tight tolerances 4 34 6 28 6 78 232 2.9744 0.595 13 14 Acoustic insulation 12 36 10 14 6 78 200 2.5641 0.513 14 Source: Field Survey, 2014.Based on the important indices, the advantages of using precast concrete were ranked and the agreement between the sampled building professionals was determined by the use of Kendall’s concordance analysis. Kendall’s concordance coefficient, which measures the degree of agreement among sets of ranking, is expressed ask:(2)W=RI-R2nn2-1/12,wherek is the number of sets of ranking (e.g., the number of judgments), n is the number of aspects of a problem or factors being ranked, R is average of the ranks assigned to the nth aspect of the problem, n(n2-1)/12 is the maximum possible squared deviation, that is, the numerator which will occur if there were perfect agreements among k sets of ranks, and the average rankings were 1,2,3,…,n. RI is the rank assigned by an individual judge to one aspect of the problem posed. The value of W ranges from 0 to 1 regardless of the number of rankings. A high value of W indicates a high degree of agreement between the set of rankings. The significance ofW was tested using chi-square distribution. The test was based on the null hypothesis H0 = thek set of rankings were unrelated and the alternative hypothesis H1 = thek set of rankings were related. The observed chi-square value is calculated using λ2=k(n-1)W, where k, n, and W are as previously defined. The critical chi-square value is read from the statistical table at (k-1) degrees of freedom. Where the calculated chi-square value exceeds the critical value (that read from tables), the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative is accepted. A high significant value of W could be interpreted as meaning that k respondents to a question are applying essentially the same standards in rating the nth aspect of a problem under study. For the purpose of interpretation of data, a rating of 1–3 was perceived to be very important, 4–7 important, 8–11 marginally important, and 12–14 not important. Table 6 shows agreement by professions on the advantages of using precast concrete(3)Grand meanRˇ=∑i=1nR1=2.36,∑R1-Rˇ2=11.34,where R1 is the mean of ranking and “n” is the number of advantages being ranked. W is coefficient of concordance, and building professionals (Quantity Surveyors, Architects, and Civil Engineers) are as follows R=RIk = groupingsW=RI-Rˇ2/[n(n2-1)/12]i=1n = number of factors ranked = 14n(n2-1)/12=14(142-1)/12=227.5W=11.34/227.5=0.050Table 6
Agreement by professionals on the advantages of using precast concrete.
Number Advantages Quantity Surveyors Architects Civil Engineers Sum of ranking (R1) Means of ranking (Rˇ) R 1 - R ˇ ( R 1 - R ˇ ) 2 Overall ranking 1 Low life cycle cost 1 2 1 4 1.33 −1.03 1.061 5 2 Reduction of on-site waste 1 1 1 3 1.00 −1.36 1.850 1 3 Speed of construction 1 1 1 3 1.00 −1.36 1.850 1 4 Quality 2 3 2 7 2.33 −0.03 0.001 13 5 Durability 2 2 3 7 2.33 −0.03 0.001 13 6 Dimensional accuracy 1 2 1 4 1.33 −1.03 1.061 5 7 Reduction of on-site labour 1 4 1 6 2.00 −0.36 0.130 12 8 Reduction of on-site activity, noise, and disturbance 3 3 2 8 2.67 0.31 0.096 10 9 Sandwich panels available for insulation 2 3 3 8 2.67 0.31 0.096 10 10 Minimal maintenance 3 3 3 9 3.00 0.64 0.410 8 11 Thermal inertia reduces lifetime energy costs 4 3 3 10 3.33 1.31 1.716 3 12 Large spans available from prestressing 3 3 3 9 3.00 0.64 0.410 8 13 Tight tolerances 4 5 2 11 3.67 1.31 1.716 3 14 Acoustic insulation 3 5 2 10 3.33 0.97 0.941 7Testing 95% significance level forW, the null hypothesis (H0 = set of ranking by Quantity Surveyors, Architects, and Civil Engineers) is unrelated. The alternative H1 are set of rankings that are related. λ2=k(n-1)W, where k is the number of groups being compared which in this case = 3 (i.e., the Quantity Surveyors, Architects, and Civil Engineers being compared). λ2=3(14-1)0.050=1.95. From the chi-square distribution tables, the critical value λ0.9552=1.95 since the observed λ2 value = 11.070 is greater than 1.95; the null hypothesis H0 is rejected; and the alternative hypothesis H1 that the set of rankings by the above groups are related is accepted. This shows that there is high degree of agreement between Quantity Surveyors, Architects, and Civil Engineers on the advantages of using precast concrete suspended slabs and columns. The Kendall’s concordance also identified reduction of on-site waste and speed of construction as the main advantages of using precast concrete.


## 5. Conclusions

The study revealed that, on average, the precast concrete slabs were 23.22% cheaper than cast-in-place concrete construction and precast columns were 21.4% cheaper than cast-in-place concrete construction, especially for large scale production. The study also revealed that the Ghanaian construction industry have not been using precast beams. Construction professionals prefer the use of precast concrete construction mainly because of low life cycle cost, reduction of on-site waste, speed of construction, and quality of work done. The study also revealed that there is high degree of agreement between Quantity Surveyors, Architects, and Civil Engineers on the advantages of using precast concrete suspended slabs and columns. The Kendall concordance identified reduction of on-site waste and speed of construction as the main advantages of using precast concrete. Prestressed beams and block precast slabs can be embraced as ground floor concrete slabs for new building constructions located in areas where the water table is high to avoid hardcore filling which aids rising damp. The continuous study of elemental cost planning in Ghana will help in the establishment of accurate initial project budget and the maintenance of that budget during the design development and documentation phases.



---

*Source: 8785129-2016-10-26.xml*