# Extraction and Hydrophobic Modification of Cotton Stalk Bark Fiber

Authors: Ya-Yu Li; Guang-Ming Du; Xin-Jie Feng; Ya-Wei Mu; De-Qiang Li
Journal: International Journal of Polymer Science
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

Cotton stalk bark fiber (CSBF) was extracted at high temperature and under high pressure, under the condition of the alkali content of 11 wt%. Experimental results proved that the extraction yield of CSBF was 27.3 wt%, and the residual alkali concentration was 2.1 wt%. Then five kinds of modifiers including methyl methacrylate (MMA), MMA plus initiator, epoxy propane, copper ethanolamine, and silane coupling agent were chosen to modify the surface of CSBF. It was found by measuring water retention value (WRV) that these five kinds of modifiers were all effective and the silane coupling agent was best modifier among all. The optimal modifying conditions of silane coupling agent were obtained: modifier concentration was 5%, the mixing temperature was 20°C, the mixing time was 1 h, and vacuum drying time was 1 h. Under the optimal condition, the WRV of the modified CSBF was 89%. It is expected that these modified CSBF may be a filler with strengthening effect in wood plastic composites (WPC) fields.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The plastics substitutes have been receiving more attention due to its applications in solving the problem of white pollution [1, 2]. Among the plastics substitutes, renewable biomass material from agricultural by-product such as cotton stalk is one of the considerable candidates [2]. It was reported that adding wood fiber into plastics to produce wood plastic composites (WPC) could improve the mechanical properties of plastics such as tensile strength, reduce the dosage of plastic materials, and decrease the cost [3].Cotton is an important human subsistence and industrial raw material. Xinjiang is the largest province of commercial cotton planted in China. In 2013, the cotton output in Xinjiang reached 3.4 million tons, occupying more than 58 wt% of that in China. Akdeniz et al. [4] reported that the cotton stalk was equivalent to three times the weight of the cotton fiber. Nowadays, the cotton stalk after harvest is mostly taken back into farmland or directly burned as fuel in low utilization value. When the cotton stalk is smashed and scattered into soil of the same field for several years, it is prone to induce cotton diseases on this field, which is a big problem affecting cotton growth. Therefore, development of simple and low cost methods for the high value-added biomaterials produced by cotton stalk is of great importance for broadening and improving its applications [5]. It was reported that 26 wt% of cotton stalk was bark [6], which was composed of 41 wt% of cellulose, 21 wt% of hemicellulose, 18 wt% of lignin, 5 wt% of pectin, 10 wt% of water-soluble matter, and 4 wt% of wax [7]. Dong et al. [8] reported that the fibers extracted from cotton stalk bark (CSB) displayed tensile properties close to cotton fibers. Young’ modulus of cellulose of crystal state was reported as 250 Gpa, which was three times that of E-glass [9]. In all, the cellulose fiber extracted from cotton stalk displayed potential applications in structural materials.Generally, the cotton stalk bark fiber (CSBF) is obtained through degumming under the condition of alkali solution at normal pressure [5–7]. In addition, steam explosion was also reported to extract the CSBF [8, 10, 11]. CSBF has strong water imbibition property due to its hydroxyl groups of cellulose, leading to a short service life of WPC in the natural environment. In recent years, rapid progress has been made in the modification of plant fibers including silane treatment [12], alkaline treatment [6], copper amine [13], acetylation [14], maleated coupling [15], and enzyme treatment [16]. For example, Park et al. [17] found that jute fiber treated by silane made the surface coherence of fiber and polypropylene tight. Islam et al. [18] reported that the modulus of elasticity (MOE) and compressive modulus of wood were significantly boosted after treatment with MMA (methyl methacrylate)/PVA (polyvinyl alcohol), indicating improvement of mechanical properties of the wood samples. Hydroxyl in cellulose and guaiacol in lignin could react with epoxypropane to form ether [19], which reduced the hydrophilicity of cellulose or lignin. Jiang and Kamdem [13] reported an increase up to around 45% in unnotched impact strength using 0.2 wt% copper amine-treated WF at the 60 wt% PVC loading level, compared with untreated wood flour. In all, the five modifiers including MMA, MMA plus initiator, epoxypropane, copper ethanolamine, and silane coupling agent were effective and low cost. However, as far as we know, the modification of CSBF using the five modifiers MMA, MMA plus initiator, epoxypropane, copper ethanolamine, and silane coupling agent has not been reported yet. Comparative study about the validity of these five modifiers will help understand the modification mechanism on CSBF.Herein, CSBF was extracted by using the alkali method under high temperature and high pressure. Then, five modifiers including MMA, MMA plus initiator, epoxypropane, copper ethanolamine, and silane coupling agent were chosen to process CSBF, respectively. Moreover, the influences of the modification conditions were also investigated in detail. It is believed that these modified CSBF may be a potential application in wood plastic composites fields.


## 2. Material and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

Cotton stalks was taken from 314 Tuan, Shihezi, in October 2014. Sodium hydroxide, anhydrous ethanol, ethanol amine, alkali type copper carbonate, potassium persulfate, methyl methacrylate, epoxypropane, and silane coupling agent are all analytically pure, used as purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.


### 2.2. Extraction of CSBF

In a typical experiment, cotton stalk bark (CSB) was peeled off first. Then the CSB was put into a kettle at 140°C for 1.5 h with NaOH under vigorous stirring (Figure1). The weight of NaOH was 11% in comparison with that of CSB. The product was separated from the solution by centrifugation, dried in air at 50°C, and smashed for further modification process.Figure 1
The extraction process of cotton stalk bark fiber.Determination of Residual Alkali Content in Black Liquid. 10 mL black liquid and 10 mL 6 wt% barium chloride were pipetted to 100 mL volumetric flask and then lignin was completely precipitated. The solution was diluted with distilled water to the scale line, shaken well, and let stand. Upper clear liquid in the volumetric flask was pipetted into conical flask. Using phenolphthalein as indicator and hydrochloric acid as standard solution, titration was done until the solution color changed from light yellow to red at the end point. Alkaline residue was calculated according to the dosage of hydrochloric acid solution.


### 2.3. Modification of CSBF

In a typical procedure, 0.5 g dry CSBF and 1 g modifier (MMA, MMA plus initiator, epoxy propane, copper ethanolamine, and silane coupling agent) were added into the mixture of 8.5 g ethanol and 0.5 g water. The mixture was stirred for 1.5 h at room temperature. After that, the product was filtered and transferred to a vacuum oven at 105°C for 2 h. In the process, the condensation dehydration, grafting, and polymerization reaction occurred. Finally, the modified CSBF was washed for 5 times with mixture of ethanol and water and dried in wind drying oven until constant weight.


### 2.4. Water Retention Value

Water retention value (WRV) was analyzed as previously reported by Raj et al. [20]. In a typical procedure, 2 g absorbent paper was placed at the bottom of the centrifuge tube (3 mL), and copper net of 100 meshes was placed on the absorbent paper. At the same time, a filter paper was cut and folded into a cone shape and filled with approximately 0.15 g CSBF, which had been immersed into deionized water for 2 h. Subsequently, the cone paper was placed on the copper net. In the end, the centrifugal tube was closed and the determination component of WRV was ready. After centrifugation, the weight of wet CSBF was determined as m1. Afterwards, the wet CSBF was dried in an air-circulating oven and its weight was determined as m2. The WRV is calculated by the formula below:(1)WRV=m1-m2m2×100%.


### 2.5. Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) Spectroscopy

Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy was carried out on an FT-IR spectrophotometer (EQUINOX55) using the KBr disk method. Before testing, the CSBF was dried at 105°C for 24 h and the testing samples were prepared with the mass ratio between CSBF and dried KBr of 1 : 300. Thirty-two scans were taken for each sample and data were recorded from the range 4000–400 cm−1 at a resolution of 4 cm−1 in the transmission mode.


## 2.1. Materials

Cotton stalks was taken from 314 Tuan, Shihezi, in October 2014. Sodium hydroxide, anhydrous ethanol, ethanol amine, alkali type copper carbonate, potassium persulfate, methyl methacrylate, epoxypropane, and silane coupling agent are all analytically pure, used as purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.


## 2.2. Extraction of CSBF

In a typical experiment, cotton stalk bark (CSB) was peeled off first. Then the CSB was put into a kettle at 140°C for 1.5 h with NaOH under vigorous stirring (Figure1). The weight of NaOH was 11% in comparison with that of CSB. The product was separated from the solution by centrifugation, dried in air at 50°C, and smashed for further modification process.Figure 1
The extraction process of cotton stalk bark fiber.Determination of Residual Alkali Content in Black Liquid. 10 mL black liquid and 10 mL 6 wt% barium chloride were pipetted to 100 mL volumetric flask and then lignin was completely precipitated. The solution was diluted with distilled water to the scale line, shaken well, and let stand. Upper clear liquid in the volumetric flask was pipetted into conical flask. Using phenolphthalein as indicator and hydrochloric acid as standard solution, titration was done until the solution color changed from light yellow to red at the end point. Alkaline residue was calculated according to the dosage of hydrochloric acid solution.


## 2.3. Modification of CSBF

In a typical procedure, 0.5 g dry CSBF and 1 g modifier (MMA, MMA plus initiator, epoxy propane, copper ethanolamine, and silane coupling agent) were added into the mixture of 8.5 g ethanol and 0.5 g water. The mixture was stirred for 1.5 h at room temperature. After that, the product was filtered and transferred to a vacuum oven at 105°C for 2 h. In the process, the condensation dehydration, grafting, and polymerization reaction occurred. Finally, the modified CSBF was washed for 5 times with mixture of ethanol and water and dried in wind drying oven until constant weight.


## 2.4. Water Retention Value

Water retention value (WRV) was analyzed as previously reported by Raj et al. [20]. In a typical procedure, 2 g absorbent paper was placed at the bottom of the centrifuge tube (3 mL), and copper net of 100 meshes was placed on the absorbent paper. At the same time, a filter paper was cut and folded into a cone shape and filled with approximately 0.15 g CSBF, which had been immersed into deionized water for 2 h. Subsequently, the cone paper was placed on the copper net. In the end, the centrifugal tube was closed and the determination component of WRV was ready. After centrifugation, the weight of wet CSBF was determined as m1. Afterwards, the wet CSBF was dried in an air-circulating oven and its weight was determined as m2. The WRV is calculated by the formula below:(1)WRV=m1-m2m2×100%.


## 2.5. Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) Spectroscopy

Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy was carried out on an FT-IR spectrophotometer (EQUINOX55) using the KBr disk method. Before testing, the CSBF was dried at 105°C for 24 h and the testing samples were prepared with the mass ratio between CSBF and dried KBr of 1 : 300. Thirty-two scans were taken for each sample and data were recorded from the range 4000–400 cm−1 at a resolution of 4 cm−1 in the transmission mode.


## 3. Result and Discussion

### 3.1. Yield of CSBF Extraction

Consider(2)Extraction  yield=mCSBFmCSB×100%.The CSBF makes up 26 wt% of the mass of CSB [6]. In this work, the extraction yield of CSBF was 27.3%, implying the approximately complete removal of lignin, hemicellulose, pectin, and other impurities.The CSB was cooked under high temperature and high pressure, and the alkali mass was set 11% in relation to that of CSB (the alkali aqueous solution was 3.1 g/L). After cooking, the alkali residue was 2.1% (aqueous solution concentration was 0.61 g/L). Alkali concentration dropped substantially. The reaction was more fully accomplished among alkali and lignin, hemicellulose, pectin, and so forth. Previous literature needed NaOH solution with concentration of about 30 g/L at normal temperature [21]. In this work, the similar result was obtained at high temperature with the concentration of NaOH solution of only 3.1 g/L. These results showed that the amount of NaOH dosage was greatly decreased, which reduced the amount of alkali waste emission and disposal.


### 3.2. Water Retention Value

One of the simple methods to study the hydrophilicity of the cellulose fiber surface is to measure the water retention value (WRV). Under the premise of same fiber fineness, WRV can reflect the fiber hydrophilic property; that is, the fiber with high value of WRV shows being more hydrophilic. The WRV of various fibers were shown in Table1. The WRV of CSB was 127%. As for CSBF, its WRV dramatically increases to 322%. In this work, the lignin and other weak hydrophilic substance in cotton stalk were almost removed by alkali cooking. The residue was cellulose, which displayed strong hydrophilicity.Table 1
The WRV of various fibers modified by different reagents.
Code name
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
Fibers
CSB
CSBF
CSBF modified by MMA
CSBF modified by initiator + MMA
CSBF modified by epoxy propane
CSBF modified by copper ethanolamine
CSBF modified by silane coupling agent
WRV/%
127
322
175
148
126
125
122When the CSBF was modified by five modifiers including MMA, the MMA plus initiator, epoxypropane, copper ethanolamine, and silane coupling agent, their WRV are 175%, 148%, 126%, 125%, and 122%, respectively. These values obviously decrease, compared with that of CSBF. The hydrophobicity of CSBF was greatly improved after being modified by those five kinds of reagents. The enhancement of hydrophobicity could be achieved by the addition of initiator to MMA (samples C and D), since the initiator could enhance the MMA grafting efficiency on the surface of CSBF. All the three latter modifiers in Table1 including epoxypropane, copper ethanolamine, and silane coupling agent displayed good hydrophobicity effects. In the previous literature [12, 13, 19], the mechanisms by these three modifiers had been explained. We try to explain the interaction mechanisms between silanes and natural fibers [12]. First of all, the silane monomers are hydrolyzed in the presence of water. Then, during the hydrolysis process, the concomitant condensation of silanols (aging) also takes place. After that, the reactive silanol monomers or oligomers are physically adsorbed to hydroxyl groups of natural fibers. Finally, under heating conditions, the hydrogen bonds between the silanols and the hydroxyl groups of fibers could be converted into the covalent bonds and liberating water.


### 3.3. FT-IR Spectra

The FT-IR spectrum of CSB was shown in Figure2(a). The band at 3424 cm−1 is O-H stretching vibration peak. The band at 2927 cm−1 is C-H peak. The band at 1739 cm−1 is the absorption of carbonyl stretching of ester or carboxyl groups in hemicelluloses. The band at 1633 cm−1 is the bending vibration peak of water. The band at 1515 cm−1 is the absorption of aromatic skeletal vibration in lignin. The band at 1250 cm−1 is the absorption of stretching vibrations of carbonyl groups in hemicelluloses. The band at 1047 cm−1 is a strong peak of C-O stretching vibration linked to hydroxyl. As for the FT-IR spectrum of CSBF (Figure 2(b)), most of the peaks are similar to those in Figure 2(a). However, the peaks at 1739 cm−1, 1515 cm−1, and 1250 cm−1 are weaker than those in Figure 2(a), indicating the removal of hemicellulose and lignin after the extraction process. The band intensity at 891 cm−1 is obviously increased, suggesting the increase of cellulose content. The band at 891 cm−1 was assigned to β-1,4 glycosidic bond characteristic absorption between the monosaccharides of cellulose [7, 8, 22].Figure 2
FT-IR spectra of (a) raw cotton stalk bark and (b) the extracted cotton stalk bark fiber.Figure3 displayed the FT-IR spectra of raw and modified CSBF. The band at 3427 cm−1 is O-H stretching vibration peak. The bands at 2974 cm−1 and 2927 cm−1 are C-H peaks. The band at 2372 cm−1 is the triple bond or cumulative double bond stretching vibration peak. The band at 1627 cm−1 is the bending vibration peak of water. The band at 1400 cm−1 is a strong peak. The band at 1049 cm−1 is a strong peak of C-O stretching vibration linked to hydroxyl. The band at 600 cm−1 is the fingerprint absorption of hexatomic ring in carbohydrate. It is found that there is little difference among these FT-IR spectra, which is the consequence of the little changing of functional groups induced by surface modification [23].Figure 3
FT-IR spectra of CSBF and 5 kinds of modified fibers: (a) CSBF; (b) CSBF modified by MMA; (c) CSBF modified by initiator + MMA; (d) CSBF modified by epoxypropane; (e) CSBF modified by copper ethanolamine; (f) CSBF modified by silane coupling agent.


### 3.4. Optimization of Experiment Condition

After a theoretical analysis, one can determine that all the stirring temperature, stirring time, vacuum drying time, and the concentration of modifier had an important effect on the modification of CSBF. Therefore, the influences of these four factors were marked asA, B, C, and D, and every factor was investigated in three levels marked as levels 1, 2, and 3, as shown in Table 2. For example, the stirring temperature was set as 0, 20, and 40°C for different tests, and these three levels were marked as levels 1, 2, and 3, respectively.Table 2
The factor-level design.
Levels
Factors
A  stirring temperature (°C)
B  stirring time (h)
C  vacuum drying time (h)
D  concentration of modifier
1
0
1.5
2
10%
2
20
1
1
5%
3
40
2
3
1%The experiment result and analysis are shown in Tables3 and 4, respectively. The influence order of the four factors was followed as B>C>D>A. Because the influences of both A and C factors were extremely small, they could be negligible factors and the levels of these two factors were determined as follows: stirring temperature was room temperature and vacuum drying time was 1 h. The optimal levels of B and D factors were both level 2; that is, the mixing time was 1 h, and modifier concentration was 5%. At last, the optimum conditions were determined as A2, B2, C2, and D2. Under the optimal experiment conditions, the WRV of the modified CSBF was 89%. This result verified that the above combination is the optimal conditions: the stirring temperature was 20°C, stirring time was 1 h, vacuum drying time was 1 h, and modifier concentration was 5%.Table 3
The results of optimization experiment.
Test number
Factors
Result
A
B
C
D
WRV
1
1
1
1
1
113%
2
1
2
2
2
90%
3
1
3
3
3
108%
4
2
1
2
3
108%
5
2
2
3
1
102%
6
2
3
1
2
101%
7
3
1
3
2
103%
8
3
2
1
3
99%
9
3
3
2
1
109%Table 4
The analysis of optimization experiment.
K value
Factors
A
B
C
D
K
1
311%
324%
312%
324%
K
2
311%
291%
307%
295%
K
3
311%
318%
313%
314%
k
1
104%
108%
104%
108%
k
2
104%
97%
103%
98%
k
3
104%
106%
104%
105%
Spannweite
0
11.1%
1.9%
9.8%
Optimum
A
2
B
2
C
2
D
2


## 3.1. Yield of CSBF Extraction

Consider(2)Extraction  yield=mCSBFmCSB×100%.The CSBF makes up 26 wt% of the mass of CSB [6]. In this work, the extraction yield of CSBF was 27.3%, implying the approximately complete removal of lignin, hemicellulose, pectin, and other impurities.The CSB was cooked under high temperature and high pressure, and the alkali mass was set 11% in relation to that of CSB (the alkali aqueous solution was 3.1 g/L). After cooking, the alkali residue was 2.1% (aqueous solution concentration was 0.61 g/L). Alkali concentration dropped substantially. The reaction was more fully accomplished among alkali and lignin, hemicellulose, pectin, and so forth. Previous literature needed NaOH solution with concentration of about 30 g/L at normal temperature [21]. In this work, the similar result was obtained at high temperature with the concentration of NaOH solution of only 3.1 g/L. These results showed that the amount of NaOH dosage was greatly decreased, which reduced the amount of alkali waste emission and disposal.


## 3.2. Water Retention Value

One of the simple methods to study the hydrophilicity of the cellulose fiber surface is to measure the water retention value (WRV). Under the premise of same fiber fineness, WRV can reflect the fiber hydrophilic property; that is, the fiber with high value of WRV shows being more hydrophilic. The WRV of various fibers were shown in Table1. The WRV of CSB was 127%. As for CSBF, its WRV dramatically increases to 322%. In this work, the lignin and other weak hydrophilic substance in cotton stalk were almost removed by alkali cooking. The residue was cellulose, which displayed strong hydrophilicity.Table 1
The WRV of various fibers modified by different reagents.
Code name
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
Fibers
CSB
CSBF
CSBF modified by MMA
CSBF modified by initiator + MMA
CSBF modified by epoxy propane
CSBF modified by copper ethanolamine
CSBF modified by silane coupling agent
WRV/%
127
322
175
148
126
125
122When the CSBF was modified by five modifiers including MMA, the MMA plus initiator, epoxypropane, copper ethanolamine, and silane coupling agent, their WRV are 175%, 148%, 126%, 125%, and 122%, respectively. These values obviously decrease, compared with that of CSBF. The hydrophobicity of CSBF was greatly improved after being modified by those five kinds of reagents. The enhancement of hydrophobicity could be achieved by the addition of initiator to MMA (samples C and D), since the initiator could enhance the MMA grafting efficiency on the surface of CSBF. All the three latter modifiers in Table1 including epoxypropane, copper ethanolamine, and silane coupling agent displayed good hydrophobicity effects. In the previous literature [12, 13, 19], the mechanisms by these three modifiers had been explained. We try to explain the interaction mechanisms between silanes and natural fibers [12]. First of all, the silane monomers are hydrolyzed in the presence of water. Then, during the hydrolysis process, the concomitant condensation of silanols (aging) also takes place. After that, the reactive silanol monomers or oligomers are physically adsorbed to hydroxyl groups of natural fibers. Finally, under heating conditions, the hydrogen bonds between the silanols and the hydroxyl groups of fibers could be converted into the covalent bonds and liberating water.


## 3.3. FT-IR Spectra

The FT-IR spectrum of CSB was shown in Figure2(a). The band at 3424 cm−1 is O-H stretching vibration peak. The band at 2927 cm−1 is C-H peak. The band at 1739 cm−1 is the absorption of carbonyl stretching of ester or carboxyl groups in hemicelluloses. The band at 1633 cm−1 is the bending vibration peak of water. The band at 1515 cm−1 is the absorption of aromatic skeletal vibration in lignin. The band at 1250 cm−1 is the absorption of stretching vibrations of carbonyl groups in hemicelluloses. The band at 1047 cm−1 is a strong peak of C-O stretching vibration linked to hydroxyl. As for the FT-IR spectrum of CSBF (Figure 2(b)), most of the peaks are similar to those in Figure 2(a). However, the peaks at 1739 cm−1, 1515 cm−1, and 1250 cm−1 are weaker than those in Figure 2(a), indicating the removal of hemicellulose and lignin after the extraction process. The band intensity at 891 cm−1 is obviously increased, suggesting the increase of cellulose content. The band at 891 cm−1 was assigned to β-1,4 glycosidic bond characteristic absorption between the monosaccharides of cellulose [7, 8, 22].Figure 2
FT-IR spectra of (a) raw cotton stalk bark and (b) the extracted cotton stalk bark fiber.Figure3 displayed the FT-IR spectra of raw and modified CSBF. The band at 3427 cm−1 is O-H stretching vibration peak. The bands at 2974 cm−1 and 2927 cm−1 are C-H peaks. The band at 2372 cm−1 is the triple bond or cumulative double bond stretching vibration peak. The band at 1627 cm−1 is the bending vibration peak of water. The band at 1400 cm−1 is a strong peak. The band at 1049 cm−1 is a strong peak of C-O stretching vibration linked to hydroxyl. The band at 600 cm−1 is the fingerprint absorption of hexatomic ring in carbohydrate. It is found that there is little difference among these FT-IR spectra, which is the consequence of the little changing of functional groups induced by surface modification [23].Figure 3
FT-IR spectra of CSBF and 5 kinds of modified fibers: (a) CSBF; (b) CSBF modified by MMA; (c) CSBF modified by initiator + MMA; (d) CSBF modified by epoxypropane; (e) CSBF modified by copper ethanolamine; (f) CSBF modified by silane coupling agent.


## 3.4. Optimization of Experiment Condition

After a theoretical analysis, one can determine that all the stirring temperature, stirring time, vacuum drying time, and the concentration of modifier had an important effect on the modification of CSBF. Therefore, the influences of these four factors were marked asA, B, C, and D, and every factor was investigated in three levels marked as levels 1, 2, and 3, as shown in Table 2. For example, the stirring temperature was set as 0, 20, and 40°C for different tests, and these three levels were marked as levels 1, 2, and 3, respectively.Table 2
The factor-level design.
Levels
Factors
A  stirring temperature (°C)
B  stirring time (h)
C  vacuum drying time (h)
D  concentration of modifier
1
0
1.5
2
10%
2
20
1
1
5%
3
40
2
3
1%The experiment result and analysis are shown in Tables3 and 4, respectively. The influence order of the four factors was followed as B>C>D>A. Because the influences of both A and C factors were extremely small, they could be negligible factors and the levels of these two factors were determined as follows: stirring temperature was room temperature and vacuum drying time was 1 h. The optimal levels of B and D factors were both level 2; that is, the mixing time was 1 h, and modifier concentration was 5%. At last, the optimum conditions were determined as A2, B2, C2, and D2. Under the optimal experiment conditions, the WRV of the modified CSBF was 89%. This result verified that the above combination is the optimal conditions: the stirring temperature was 20°C, stirring time was 1 h, vacuum drying time was 1 h, and modifier concentration was 5%.Table 3
The results of optimization experiment.
Test number
Factors
Result
A
B
C
D
WRV
1
1
1
1
1
113%
2
1
2
2
2
90%
3
1
3
3
3
108%
4
2
1
2
3
108%
5
2
2
3
1
102%
6
2
3
1
2
101%
7
3
1
3
2
103%
8
3
2
1
3
99%
9
3
3
2
1
109%Table 4
The analysis of optimization experiment.
K value
Factors
A
B
C
D
K
1
311%
324%
312%
324%
K
2
311%
291%
307%
295%
K
3
311%
318%
313%
314%
k
1
104%
108%
104%
108%
k
2
104%
97%
103%
98%
k
3
104%
106%
104%
105%
Spannweite
0
11.1%
1.9%
9.8%
Optimum
A
2
B
2
C
2
D
2


## 4. Conclusions

In summary, CSBF was extracted under the low concentration of alkali by an environmentally-friendly extraction method using high temperature and high pressure reaction kettle. Five modifiers including MMA, the MMA plus initiator, epoxypropane, copper ethanolamine, and silane coupling agent were used to modify CSBF. It was found that all the five modifiers could raise the hydrophobic property of CSBF. The as-modified CSBF by silane coupling agent displayed excellent hydrophobic property among five kinds of modifiers. The optimal condition of silane coupling agent on CSBF was studied in detail. It was found that the WRV of as-modified CSBF was 89% at 20°C with stirring time of 1 h and vacuum drying time of 1 h using modifier concentration of 5%. It is believed that these modified CSBF may be a potential application in WPC fields.



---

*Source: 8769360-2016-05-24.xml*