# Novel Compact Design and Investigation of a Super Wideband Millimeter Wave Antenna for Body-Centric Communications

Authors: H. M. Arifur Rahman; Mohammad Monirujjaman Khan; Mohammed Baz; Mehedi Masud; Mohammed A. AlZain
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

This paper presents a novel design for a multiple band millimeter wave antenna with a wide active region in the extremely high frequency (EHF) range. The antenna's performance was tested at three evenly separated frequencies: 60 GHz within the V-band region, 80 GHz within the E-band region, and 100 GHz. Simulation exhibits satisfactory results in terms of gain and efficiency, although the efficiency falling tendency for higher frequency persists. As millimeter wave antennas have miniature-like dimensions and low penetration depth into human body layers, the performance of these antennas is less disturbed by the presence of a human body, making them ideal for body-centric wireless communication (BCWC) applications. Thus, a human body model was created virtually with the necessary property data. Simulations are repeated at the same frequencies as before, with the antenna kept close to the constructed human body model. The results were promising as the gains found increased radiation patterns and return loss curves remained almost identical, except some efficiencies that were considered. Some H-plane radiation patterns are changed by the presence of a human body. Although all three frequencies present satisfactory results, 60 GHz is found to be more balanced, but 100 GHz shows better gain and directivity. Multiple band operability makes this antenna suitable for various applications. Finally, a distance-based analysis was conducted to realize the in-depth characteristics of the antenna by placing the antenna at five different gaps from the human body. The result verifies the antenna’s category as suitable for body-centric communications.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The millimeter wave, also known as mmWave or millimeter band, is a popular research sector for telecommunication researchers because of its numerous advantages over other lower frequency bands. The spectrum covers the 30 GHz to 300 GHz frequency range, having wavelengths of 10 mm to 1 mm, from where the name came. The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) refers to this frequency range as extremely high frequency (EHF) because of its extremely higher frequency spectrum.Millimeter band electromagnetic waves suffer from atmospheric attenuation, which causes them to gradually degrade as they propagate through the environment or air. This attenuation is mostly the result of absorption by environmental components, such as gases and humidity. Absorption increases as the frequency increases, and maximum frequencies can only remain active within several meters of distance. Radio waves exhibit better performance in less humid environments. Apart from this limitation, millimeter waves can be highly effective in short-range distances. This limitation also enables designers to reuse frequency to increase efficiency. To utilize this potential, cell sizes are reduced, occupied by fewer cellular network clients. Access point numbers can be higher in short-range operations.Millimeter wave signals can be used in an extensive area of operation. Antennas designed for mmWaves have very small form factors, which allows them to be equipped with a variety of mobile and wireless network devices and services. mmWave antennas are also known to consume less power and are more power-efficient during operation. These signals are capable of achieving extremely high data transfer rates compared to the smaller frequency bands, which makes them suitable for point-to-point (P2P) high-speed wireless local area network operations. They are currently being used in military operations, security scanners, fire detection radars, airports, and many other short-distance wireless Internet of things, IoT devices, and scientific research [1].Within the huge spectrum of mmWave, the V-band of 60 GHz, more precisely 57 GHz to 54 GHz, is kept unlicensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Due to the lack of various device implementations, this band remains low in traffic worldwide. Because of the permitted accessibility and its other advantages, researchers worldwide are heavily interested in this frequency band. But it has a few drawbacks compared to other frequency bands in the millimeter wave range. This frequency band coincides with the harmonics of the oxygen molecules in the air and thus gets absorbed so easily into the Earth’s terrestrial environment. So the bandwidth delivery distance becomes shorter at this particular frequency [1, 2]. The range of 70 to 80 GHz of the E-band is also made publicly accessible by the FCC with an easy licensing procedure. In June 2020, the American aerospace manufacturer and space transportation service, SpaceX, applied for the utilization of this band for their orbital deployment and operating authority for the SpaceX Gen2 NGSO satellite system [3]. However, in environments without obstacles like brick walls or metal barriers, and for short-range operations, millimeter waves can achieve an extremely high data transfer rate between portable electronic devices, which can be used for fast file transfer, high definition video streaming, short-range wireless fidelity (WiFi), and much more. Such environments can be found in halls or in medical wards in a hospital.For body-centric communication, several sensor nodes are placed on, inside, or in close proximity to the human body to collect vital information and send it to a common node where the data is fetched. Mostly, these collected data need to be either stored on a base station computer or sent to a distantly located doctor or physician or to a monitoring healthcare center. Tiny microchip antennas are used as the medium as the sensor nodes are dispersed throughout the body and wires will make it more sophisticated or sometimes impossible to maintain a connection. As a result, it is more commonly known as the body-centric wireless network (BCWN), which is also associated with the wireless body area network (WBAN). These are specially used for medical purposes to distantly monitor someone’s vital signs like heartbeat rate, blood pressure, electrocardiogram (ECG), or peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) reading collection. In healthcare centers, these can also be used for athletes in sports or astronauts in space [4].As antennas play a key role in body-centric wireless communication, researchers must keep in mind while designing an antenna how it will perform when it is in close proximity to a human body. Antennas near the human body behave differently than they do in free space. The capacitive properties of the human body are most likely to disturb the performance as well as the efficiency of the antenna [5–7]. The presence of a human body close to an antenna has a notable influence on the radiation efficiency, resonant frequency, radiation patterns, and the input impedance of the model [5–7]. To simulate the performance of an antenna close to a human body, a human body model should be created consisting of three different layers: a thinner skin layer with a loss tangent of 1.37, a comparatively less thin fat layer with a loss tangent of 0.27 adjacent to it, and a muscle layer with a loss tangent of 0.0012, respectively [8].Christophe Calvez et al. previously characterized and analyzed millimeter wave antenna solutions for 60 GHz operation using both SoC (System on Chip) and SiP (System in Package) techniques. Comparing a planner dipole antenna on chip (SoC) with a silicone substrate and Si-IPD in a package antenna, researchers found SiP antennas can achieve better gains and are mostly suitable for industrial use [9]. A very simple rectangular-shaped patch antenna was designed by Adamu [10]. It is powered by a coaxial probe feed, operates at 38 GHz, and is claimed to have 90% power efficiency. Choi et al. have designed a miniature mmWave 5G antenna and fabricated it with anodized aluminum oxide (AAO). Researchers claimed they had used 99.99% pure aluminum thin sheet, which reduces the antenna volume and weight, making it suitable for mobile devices. The antenna operates at 29 GHz and has a gain of 5.02 dB to 5.62 dB [11].Many researchers have tried to design a flawless millimeter wave antenna with high gain and efficiency in the past decade, but very few of them have performed satisfactorily when it comes to the human body. The antenna must perform at least within an excellent operable region for body-centric wireless communication. A mmWave antenna consisting of two identical patch arrays set up face-to-face 19.5 cm apart fed by a coaxial feed launcher operates within the 37 to 39 GHz frequency range with an optimized gain by Cheng-Nan Hu et al. [12] but has an unknown performance near the human body, as the model does not appear to be suitable for BCWN. Heba Shawkey and Dalia Elsheakh suggest a dual-meander line (DML) antenna for body-centric networks and biomedical applications that works in several bands: 22 GHz, 34 GHz, 44 GHz, and 58 GHz. The design used a UMC 180 nm complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) fabrication process with a low-resistivity silicon substrate and an interdielectric layer embedded with six metal layers. A dielectric passivation layer was applied to the M6 top metallic surface [13]. To compare the human body effect, simulations placed the antenna inside and over the human body and observed the downshift of the resonant frequency and operating bandwidth increment. A textile antenna for wearable body-centric networks has been presented by Chahat et al., which operates in the mmWave frequency range. It was claimed to be the first time that it was implemented with a hybrid textile substrate and that it operates at a frequency range of 57 GHz to 64 GHz [14]. The authors of [15] presented a novel and compact shaped textile substrate for body-centric communications based on a 60 GHz mmWave antenna. A comparison of antenna performance parameters was conducted utilizing various textile substrates. The proposed antenna of the paper [15] was also tested by placing it on a three-layer human body model. In [16], a Yagi-Udah cotton-based mmWave antenna for on-body communication was presented. The antenna works at 60 GHz and it is bigger in size. According to the authors in [17], a printed antenna for mmWave body-centric communication is presented which operates at 60 GHz. The antenna has a length and width of 14 × 10.5 mm.The major contribution of this paper is to propose a novel and compact design for a multiband and super wideband mmWave antenna, and its free space and human body performance are simulated and compared. Performance was tested at three different frequencies (60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz) within the popular mmWave range. A virtual human body model was created consisting of layers to evaluate its performance over a human body at the same frequencies as the body-centric network. According to the reported literatures in this manuscript, it is noted that most of the mmWave antennas are bigger in size, and they work at lower frequency bands. The maximum operating frequency band was 60 GHz in the presented literatures. However, the proposed antenna is the smallest mmWave antenna to the best of knowledge of the authors of this paper. The overall length and width of this antenna is 8 and 5.2 mm, respectively. The antenna is novel because it works multiple band at the higher frequency bands, and it has super wideband characteristics. In previous studies, researches have not investigated 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz multiband compact and wideband antenna for BCWC. This proposed antenna presents very good performance. Hence, this antenna beats the state of the arts and is considered to be the novel antenna in BCWC application.The remainder of the paper is divided into the following sections: The antenna's design is described in Section2. Section 3 includes free space simulation in different bands and performance parameters. In Section 4, human body performance compared to free space was presented. Section 5 contains the evaluation of BCWC compatibility by distance-based study, and, finally, in Section 6, the conclusion was drawn based on the result comparisons.


## 2. Antenna Design

Computer Simulation Technology (CST) Microwave Studio Suite was used to build and test the antenna design. The radiating element, substrate, and ground plane were the three neighboring planner components in the model. The overall length and width of the antenna are 8 mm and 5.12 mm, respectively. The total thickness of all three layers is 1.57 mm, while the radiating patch is 0.035 mm, the substrate is 1.5 mm, and the ground is 0.035 mm thick, respectively. The wavelength of the antenna for the operating frequencies of 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz is 5 mm, 3.75 mm, and 3 mm, respectively. Table1 summarizes the electrical size of the antenna at different frequencies. Figures 1(a)–1(e) show the antenna design, parameters, and front and back views with detailed dimensions. The substrate is made of flame retardant fiberglass reinforced epoxy (FR-4) with a dielectric constant of 3. An inverted lotus petal-shaped cutout ground plane actually consists of four parts: a circular part, a triangular cutout at the bottom of it, a top-left rectangular shape cutout, and an added small rectangular brick on that cutout pace. Annealed copper was selected for the ground. The radiator patch is placed on the upper side of the substrate with a feed line and a waveguide port at the base for source excitation. The feed line is 3.136 mm long and 0.832 mm wide. The elliptical half-cylinder has a radius of 1.216 mm and a vertical axis radius of 1.76 mm. A 0.064 mm wide equilateral triangular slot 1.92 mm of each arm is cut in the middle for a better response. The middle rectangle is 1.28 mm long and 0.576 mm tall, with 0.128 mm slots on top and bottom. On the opposite side of the substrate, the circular slot is centered in the middle horizontally but vertically 4.768 mm higher from the bottom. The radius of the circular shape is 2.128 mm. The rectangular cutout has a dimension of 5.12 mm × 3.52 mm. The length of the bottom triangular extruded sides has been given in Figure 1(e).Table 1
Electrical size at different frequencies.
MaterialPhysical size (mm)Electrical size at 60 GHz (λ)Electrical size at 80 GHz (λ)Electrical size at 100 GHz (λ)Length of the substrate80.6250.4680.375Width of the substrate5.20.960.720.576Height of the substrate1.573.182.3881.91Length of the radiating element3.1781.571.1790.94Width of the radiating element2.4322.0551.541.233Height of the radiating element0.035142.85107.1485.71Figure 1
Antenna design and parameters (a) 3D view, (b) front view, (c) back view, (d) front view with dimensions, and (e) back view with dimensions.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)


## 3. Free Space Simulation

For the excitation, a waveguide port has been placed on the bottom of the antenna by touching the feed line. Three frequencies are selected from the mmWave range for performance analysis. These frequencies are separated by 20 GHz : 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz. For free space analysis, return loss response, 3D and polar plot radiation patterns from two different planes, gain, radiation efficiency, and total efficiencies were calculated. Simulations were done on a Windows-based modeling and simulation app, CST Microwave Studio Suite.


### 3.1. Return Loss Response

Figure2 shows the return loss response curve for the proposed compact antenna in the 50 GHz to 110 GHz range in free space. Almost all the spectrum stays in an active region under −10 dB. Three selected frequencies were marked, and their corresponding return loss values in dB are shown in the bottom-right corner. Three resonant frequencies can be clearly seen in the figure too that have been considered for the performance parameters analysis. The return loss values are excellent and below −10 dB. The return loss values at 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz are −22.802 dB, −24.716 dB, and −16.087 dB, respectively. The bandwidth of this antenna is very wide, as can be seen from Figure 2.Figure 2
Free space return loss.


### 3.2. Free Space Radiation Patterns

#### 3.2.1. 3D Patterns

Figures3(a)–3(c) show the 3D radiation patterns of the antenna for 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz. This antenna's three-dimensional emission patterns are almost omnidirectional, with some deformation at certain directions.Figure 3
3D radiation patterns at (a) 60 GHz, (b) 80 GHz, and (c) 100 GHz (from left to right).
(a)(b)(c)At higher frequencies, the distortion is greater in comparison with the lower frequencies. From Figure3(a), a 3D pattern for 60 GHz with a maximum gain of 4.67 dB is spotted on the XY-plane between the positive X-axis and the Y-axis. Figure 3(b) for 80 GHz shows maximum gain directed in the same plane but slightly bent to the positive X-axis. The recorded gain is 4.12 dB. In Figure 3(c), for 100 GHz, the maximum gain is 6.54 dB, which is towards the positive Y-axis. Another almost symmetrical lobe with a similar gain can be seen on the negative X-axis.


#### 3.2.2. Polar Plot Radiation Patterns

For all three frequencies (60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz), the polar plot radiation patterns are presented in both the XY- and YZ-planes. Figures4(a) and 4(b) show the polar plot radiation patterns of the antenna for the XY-plane and YZ-plane at 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz.Figure 4
Polar plot radiation patterns of different planes: (a) XY-plane and (b) YZ-plane.
(a)(b)Figure4(a) portrays a polar plot radiation pattern for all three frequencies in the XY-plane. For 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz, the main lobe directions are 58°, 21°, and 69°, respectively. Lobe magnitudes were found at 4.33 dB for 60 GHz with an angular width of 33.3 degrees, 4.11 dB for 80 GHz with an angular width of 32.2 degrees, and 5.779 dB for 100 GHz with an angular width of 21.1 degrees. Figure 4(b) shows the two-dimensional patterns for all three frequencies in the YZ-plane. For 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz, the main lobe directions are at 140°, 124°, and 109°, respectively. Lobe magnitudes were found at 1.97 dB for 60 GHz with an angular width of 47.9 degrees, 0.365 dB for 80 GHz with an angular width of 43.0 degrees, and 0.745 dB for 100 GHz with an angular width of 42.1 degrees. The antenna shows stability at all three frequencies, though it provides better gain and directivity at 100 GHz. The XY- and YZ-plane radiation patterns for 60 GHz and 80 GHz are comparable, but at 100 GHz they look slightly distorted.


### 3.3. VSWR

Figure5 shows the free space voltage standing wave ratio curve over the frequency span of 50 to 110 GHz. Since the antenna has a wide bandwidth at −10 dB return loss, it shows good impedance matching. Hence, the VSWR of the antenna over the wide frequency range shows good values. The voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) values for three observing frequencies are 1.1564, 1.1234, and 1.3724 for 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz, respectively. In comparison with these three selected frequencies (60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHZ), the VSWR value is noticed to be slightly higher at 100 GHz.Figure 5
Free space voltage standing wave ratio curve.


### 3.4. Gain and Efficiency

Table2 shows the values of gain, efficiency, and VSWR of three different frequencies of the antenna. From Table 2, it is observed that the antenna displays an overall better gain at 100 GHz with 5.779 dB. At 60 GHz, the gain is slightly lower than that of 100 GHz, but satisfactory. The gain in the E-band is a bit lower than the other two, but still above 4 dB. In terms of efficiency, it shows that as the frequency increases, efficiency falls gradually. The higher radiation efficiency is noticed at 60 GHz as compared with 100 GHz.Table 2
Gain and radiation efficiency.
Frequencies60 GHz80 GHz100 GHzRadiation efficiency (%)70.6563.9657.31Total efficiency (%)70.2863.7455.89VSWR1.15641.12341.3724Gain (dB)4.6694.1255.779


## 3.1. Return Loss Response

Figure2 shows the return loss response curve for the proposed compact antenna in the 50 GHz to 110 GHz range in free space. Almost all the spectrum stays in an active region under −10 dB. Three selected frequencies were marked, and their corresponding return loss values in dB are shown in the bottom-right corner. Three resonant frequencies can be clearly seen in the figure too that have been considered for the performance parameters analysis. The return loss values are excellent and below −10 dB. The return loss values at 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz are −22.802 dB, −24.716 dB, and −16.087 dB, respectively. The bandwidth of this antenna is very wide, as can be seen from Figure 2.Figure 2
Free space return loss.


## 3.2. Free Space Radiation Patterns

### 3.2.1. 3D Patterns

Figures3(a)–3(c) show the 3D radiation patterns of the antenna for 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz. This antenna's three-dimensional emission patterns are almost omnidirectional, with some deformation at certain directions.Figure 3
3D radiation patterns at (a) 60 GHz, (b) 80 GHz, and (c) 100 GHz (from left to right).
(a)(b)(c)At higher frequencies, the distortion is greater in comparison with the lower frequencies. From Figure3(a), a 3D pattern for 60 GHz with a maximum gain of 4.67 dB is spotted on the XY-plane between the positive X-axis and the Y-axis. Figure 3(b) for 80 GHz shows maximum gain directed in the same plane but slightly bent to the positive X-axis. The recorded gain is 4.12 dB. In Figure 3(c), for 100 GHz, the maximum gain is 6.54 dB, which is towards the positive Y-axis. Another almost symmetrical lobe with a similar gain can be seen on the negative X-axis.


### 3.2.2. Polar Plot Radiation Patterns

For all three frequencies (60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz), the polar plot radiation patterns are presented in both the XY- and YZ-planes. Figures4(a) and 4(b) show the polar plot radiation patterns of the antenna for the XY-plane and YZ-plane at 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz.Figure 4
Polar plot radiation patterns of different planes: (a) XY-plane and (b) YZ-plane.
(a)(b)Figure4(a) portrays a polar plot radiation pattern for all three frequencies in the XY-plane. For 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz, the main lobe directions are 58°, 21°, and 69°, respectively. Lobe magnitudes were found at 4.33 dB for 60 GHz with an angular width of 33.3 degrees, 4.11 dB for 80 GHz with an angular width of 32.2 degrees, and 5.779 dB for 100 GHz with an angular width of 21.1 degrees. Figure 4(b) shows the two-dimensional patterns for all three frequencies in the YZ-plane. For 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz, the main lobe directions are at 140°, 124°, and 109°, respectively. Lobe magnitudes were found at 1.97 dB for 60 GHz with an angular width of 47.9 degrees, 0.365 dB for 80 GHz with an angular width of 43.0 degrees, and 0.745 dB for 100 GHz with an angular width of 42.1 degrees. The antenna shows stability at all three frequencies, though it provides better gain and directivity at 100 GHz. The XY- and YZ-plane radiation patterns for 60 GHz and 80 GHz are comparable, but at 100 GHz they look slightly distorted.


## 3.2.1. 3D Patterns

Figures3(a)–3(c) show the 3D radiation patterns of the antenna for 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz. This antenna's three-dimensional emission patterns are almost omnidirectional, with some deformation at certain directions.Figure 3
3D radiation patterns at (a) 60 GHz, (b) 80 GHz, and (c) 100 GHz (from left to right).
(a)(b)(c)At higher frequencies, the distortion is greater in comparison with the lower frequencies. From Figure3(a), a 3D pattern for 60 GHz with a maximum gain of 4.67 dB is spotted on the XY-plane between the positive X-axis and the Y-axis. Figure 3(b) for 80 GHz shows maximum gain directed in the same plane but slightly bent to the positive X-axis. The recorded gain is 4.12 dB. In Figure 3(c), for 100 GHz, the maximum gain is 6.54 dB, which is towards the positive Y-axis. Another almost symmetrical lobe with a similar gain can be seen on the negative X-axis.


## 3.2.2. Polar Plot Radiation Patterns

For all three frequencies (60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz), the polar plot radiation patterns are presented in both the XY- and YZ-planes. Figures4(a) and 4(b) show the polar plot radiation patterns of the antenna for the XY-plane and YZ-plane at 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz.Figure 4
Polar plot radiation patterns of different planes: (a) XY-plane and (b) YZ-plane.
(a)(b)Figure4(a) portrays a polar plot radiation pattern for all three frequencies in the XY-plane. For 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz, the main lobe directions are 58°, 21°, and 69°, respectively. Lobe magnitudes were found at 4.33 dB for 60 GHz with an angular width of 33.3 degrees, 4.11 dB for 80 GHz with an angular width of 32.2 degrees, and 5.779 dB for 100 GHz with an angular width of 21.1 degrees. Figure 4(b) shows the two-dimensional patterns for all three frequencies in the YZ-plane. For 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz, the main lobe directions are at 140°, 124°, and 109°, respectively. Lobe magnitudes were found at 1.97 dB for 60 GHz with an angular width of 47.9 degrees, 0.365 dB for 80 GHz with an angular width of 43.0 degrees, and 0.745 dB for 100 GHz with an angular width of 42.1 degrees. The antenna shows stability at all three frequencies, though it provides better gain and directivity at 100 GHz. The XY- and YZ-plane radiation patterns for 60 GHz and 80 GHz are comparable, but at 100 GHz they look slightly distorted.


## 3.3. VSWR

Figure5 shows the free space voltage standing wave ratio curve over the frequency span of 50 to 110 GHz. Since the antenna has a wide bandwidth at −10 dB return loss, it shows good impedance matching. Hence, the VSWR of the antenna over the wide frequency range shows good values. The voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) values for three observing frequencies are 1.1564, 1.1234, and 1.3724 for 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz, respectively. In comparison with these three selected frequencies (60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHZ), the VSWR value is noticed to be slightly higher at 100 GHz.Figure 5
Free space voltage standing wave ratio curve.


## 3.4. Gain and Efficiency

Table2 shows the values of gain, efficiency, and VSWR of three different frequencies of the antenna. From Table 2, it is observed that the antenna displays an overall better gain at 100 GHz with 5.779 dB. At 60 GHz, the gain is slightly lower than that of 100 GHz, but satisfactory. The gain in the E-band is a bit lower than the other two, but still above 4 dB. In terms of efficiency, it shows that as the frequency increases, efficiency falls gradually. The higher radiation efficiency is noticed at 60 GHz as compared with 100 GHz.Table 2
Gain and radiation efficiency.
Frequencies60 GHz80 GHz100 GHzRadiation efficiency (%)70.6563.9657.31Total efficiency (%)70.2863.7455.89VSWR1.15641.12341.3724Gain (dB)4.6694.1255.779


## 4. On-Body Simulation

A three-layer human body model was developed to test the antenna's on-body performance. For the convenience of the simulation, three outermost layers of the human body have been taken into account, which will be closer to the antenna. Skin, fat, and muscle are the three layers. A skin model with a skin thickness of 1.3 mm was created with its dielectric and other properties. Similarly, the fat layer is made with a thickness of 2 mm, and the muscle layer, which is the inner and the heavier one, is made with a thickness of 10 mm. The height and width of the whole human body model are 10 mm × 14 mm. All the layers are then placed sequentially without any gaps, like a real human body. Figures6(a) and 6(b) show the created human body model with the antenna with its dimensions. The designed antenna was then placed over the human body model, keeping a distance of 4 mm. After that, simulations were done, and then the newly simulated results were compared with the previous ones. The accounted properties (relative permittivity, loss tangent) [18] and dimensions of the three-layer human body model are shown in Table 3.Figure 6
Antenna with human body model: (a) 3D view and (b) side view.
(a)(b)Table 3
Modeled human body layer parameters and properties.
LayersSkinFatMuscleLength (mm)141414Width (mm)101010Thickness (mm)1.3210Ave. penetration depth (mm)0.483.370.41Relative permittivity7.97533.13242.8152Loss tangent1.370.270.0012Conductivity (S/m)36.3972.815252.825


### 4.1. On-Body Return Loss

As illustrated in Figure7, the on-body return loss curve is compared to the free space return loss. The return loss curve becomes more sharp-edged at the resonant locations and slightly left-shifted. On the observed frequencies of 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz, return loss values decreased from −22.8 dB to −32.42 dB, −24.72 dB to −25.64 dB, and −16.09 dB to −17.43 dB, respectively. However, this antenna shows good return loss responses both in free space and also on the body. Both free space and on-body return loss levels are less than −10 dB at 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz. If we consider bandwidth at −10 dB, this antenna shows super wideband impedance bandwidth, which is very good for very high-speed data transmission. Because of the presence of the human body, there are negligible effects on the on-body return loss for this proposed super wideband mmWave antenna in this research work.Figure 7
Comparison curves for free space and on-body return loss.


### 4.2. 3D Radiation Free Space and On-Body Radiation Pattern Comparison

The comparison of free space and on-body 3D radiation patterns for 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz is shown in Figures8(a)–8(f). From Figure 8, it is noted that there are very slight changes in on-body 3D radiation patterns in comparison with the on-body case. However, due to the presence of the human body model at the back of the antenna, the peak gain for on-body cases increases for all three frequencies. At 60 GHz and 80 GHz, passive lobes are detected with the existing ones with a very slight change in directivity, except for 100 GHz, which remains very stable. Gain increased in all three frequencies while it is close to the human body model. For 60 GHz, it has now increased to 5.39 dB from 4.86 dB. Similarly, for 80 GHz, it has shifted to 4.69 dB from 4.12 dB, and for 100 GHz, it recorded 7.01 dB from 6.54 dB.Figure 8
: 3D radiation pattern comparison: (a) free space 60 GHz, (b) on-body 60 GHz, (c) free space at 80 GHz, (d) on-body at 80 GHz, (e) free space at 100 GHz, and (f) on-body at 100 GHz.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


### 4.3. Comparison of Free Space and On-Body Polar Plot Radiation Patterns

Figures9(a)–9(f) illustrate a comparison of polar plot free space and on-body radiation patterns for the XY- and YZ-planes at 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz. It is noted that in both planes, the radiation patterns do not change much but the power level does. Figure 9 present the radiation pattern changes after placing the antenna 4 mm apart from the human body on two different planes at 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz. Three figures from the top row of the XY-plane show the changes are very slight in the patterns for all three frequencies. The main lobe and side lobe directions are almost identical except for some gain value changes. After placing the antenna close to the human body model, on the XY-plane, at 60, 80, and 100 GHz, the main lobe magnitudes are now 5.13 dB, 4.71 dB, and 7.01 dB, respectively. The primary lobe directions are 58°, 21°, and 70° in the same order. Similarly, for 60, 80, and 100 GHz on the YZ-plane, the main lobe magnitudes are now 5.12 dB, 3.16 dB, and 1.75 dB with their primary lobe directions of 29°, 48°, and 99°, respectively. To have a clear view of the changes and compare them with the free space data, Table 4 has been presented.Figure 9
Free space versus on-body radiation pattern comparison: (a) XY-plane at 60 GHz, (b) XY-plane at 80 GHz, (c) XY-plane at 100 GHz, (d) YZ-plane at 60 GHz, (e) YZ-plane at 80 GHz, and (f) YZ-plane at 100 GHz.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)Table 4
Comparison of polar plot radiation patterns at different angles: lobe-wise (FS, free space and OB, on-body).
Frequency and planes60 GHz80 GHz100 GHzXYYZXYYZXYYZFSOBFSOBFSOBFSOBFSOBFSOBPrimary lobe magnitude (dB)4.335.131.975.124.114.710.373.165.777.010.751.75Primary lobe direction58°58°140°29°21°21°124°48°69°70°109°99°Lobe width (degree)33.334.847.930.232.233.24321.921.119.742.136.4Side lobe level (dB)−3.5−3.2−5.9−6.8−3.3−1.5−1.5−3.0−1.7−1.0−1.7−3.2From Table4, it is determined that the antenna performs much better when it is closer to the human body from a radiation perspective. The results on the XY-plane are very stable in both free space and on-body conditions. Only some variations in gain and directivity can be noticed on the H-plane (YZ). It needs to be mentioned that the table data for “primary lobe magnitude” is rounded up to two decimal places, while others are rounded up to one.


### 4.4. On-Body versus Free Space VSWR Comparison

After placing the antenna 4 mm above the created human body model, the VSWR curve was calculated again and compared with the previously generated “free space” curve. Figure10 shows the comparison of free pace and on-body VSWR curves. The on-body VSWR curve pattern is nearly similar to the free space one, but the on-body curve is noticed to be slightly left-shifted. For the three observing frequencies, results have become much better for 60 GHz, which is down to 1.049 from 1.156 now. At 80 GHz, both free space and the body curve get intertwined, and values are very close. At 100 GHz, it is 1.31, which is better than the 1.37 for free space.Figure 10
Free space versus on-body VSWR curves.


### 4.5. Gain, VSWR, and Efficiency Comparison

In Table5, on-body simulated gain, VSWR, and efficiency results were compared with the previously recorded free space simulation data. Due to the lossy nature of the human body, efficiencies are reduced for on-body scenarios. Lossy tissues of the human body absorb radiation power, which results in a reduction of efficiency from the free space when an antenna is placed on the body. Almost 8% of radiation efficiency is reduced at all three frequencies, which indicates that the gradual increment of frequencies alongside the gradual decrease in efficiency does not have a proportional effect on the antennas surrounding the human body. Voltage standing wave ratio at 60 GHz looks more revised in on-body simulation. In terms of gain, on-body performance data outpaced free space performance in all three frequencies. For all three frequencies (60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz), the gain increases when the antenna is placed on the body. However, at a higher frequency, at 100 GHz, the on-body gain is noticed to be the highest (7.007 dB).Table 5
Gain, VSWR, and efficiency comparison (FS = free space and OB = on-body).
Frequencies60 GHz80 GHz100 GHzFSOBFSOBFSOBRadiation efficiency (%)70.6562.1263.9653.5557.3149.61Total efficiency (%)70.2862.0863.7453.2555.8948.71VSWR1.15641.04911.12341.11031.37241.3105Gain (dB)4.6695.3944.1254.6885.7797.007All the designs and the results in this study are based on computer simulation using professional simulation software, CST Microwave Studio. Unfortunately, these simulated results could not be verified with a real-life fabricated one for lack of scope. However, many published articles have justified their CST Microwave Studio simulated results with real-life measurements and found similar outcomes [19–22].


## 4.1. On-Body Return Loss

As illustrated in Figure7, the on-body return loss curve is compared to the free space return loss. The return loss curve becomes more sharp-edged at the resonant locations and slightly left-shifted. On the observed frequencies of 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz, return loss values decreased from −22.8 dB to −32.42 dB, −24.72 dB to −25.64 dB, and −16.09 dB to −17.43 dB, respectively. However, this antenna shows good return loss responses both in free space and also on the body. Both free space and on-body return loss levels are less than −10 dB at 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz. If we consider bandwidth at −10 dB, this antenna shows super wideband impedance bandwidth, which is very good for very high-speed data transmission. Because of the presence of the human body, there are negligible effects on the on-body return loss for this proposed super wideband mmWave antenna in this research work.Figure 7
Comparison curves for free space and on-body return loss.


## 4.2. 3D Radiation Free Space and On-Body Radiation Pattern Comparison

The comparison of free space and on-body 3D radiation patterns for 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz is shown in Figures8(a)–8(f). From Figure 8, it is noted that there are very slight changes in on-body 3D radiation patterns in comparison with the on-body case. However, due to the presence of the human body model at the back of the antenna, the peak gain for on-body cases increases for all three frequencies. At 60 GHz and 80 GHz, passive lobes are detected with the existing ones with a very slight change in directivity, except for 100 GHz, which remains very stable. Gain increased in all three frequencies while it is close to the human body model. For 60 GHz, it has now increased to 5.39 dB from 4.86 dB. Similarly, for 80 GHz, it has shifted to 4.69 dB from 4.12 dB, and for 100 GHz, it recorded 7.01 dB from 6.54 dB.Figure 8
: 3D radiation pattern comparison: (a) free space 60 GHz, (b) on-body 60 GHz, (c) free space at 80 GHz, (d) on-body at 80 GHz, (e) free space at 100 GHz, and (f) on-body at 100 GHz.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


## 4.3. Comparison of Free Space and On-Body Polar Plot Radiation Patterns

Figures9(a)–9(f) illustrate a comparison of polar plot free space and on-body radiation patterns for the XY- and YZ-planes at 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz. It is noted that in both planes, the radiation patterns do not change much but the power level does. Figure 9 present the radiation pattern changes after placing the antenna 4 mm apart from the human body on two different planes at 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz. Three figures from the top row of the XY-plane show the changes are very slight in the patterns for all three frequencies. The main lobe and side lobe directions are almost identical except for some gain value changes. After placing the antenna close to the human body model, on the XY-plane, at 60, 80, and 100 GHz, the main lobe magnitudes are now 5.13 dB, 4.71 dB, and 7.01 dB, respectively. The primary lobe directions are 58°, 21°, and 70° in the same order. Similarly, for 60, 80, and 100 GHz on the YZ-plane, the main lobe magnitudes are now 5.12 dB, 3.16 dB, and 1.75 dB with their primary lobe directions of 29°, 48°, and 99°, respectively. To have a clear view of the changes and compare them with the free space data, Table 4 has been presented.Figure 9
Free space versus on-body radiation pattern comparison: (a) XY-plane at 60 GHz, (b) XY-plane at 80 GHz, (c) XY-plane at 100 GHz, (d) YZ-plane at 60 GHz, (e) YZ-plane at 80 GHz, and (f) YZ-plane at 100 GHz.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)Table 4
Comparison of polar plot radiation patterns at different angles: lobe-wise (FS, free space and OB, on-body).
Frequency and planes60 GHz80 GHz100 GHzXYYZXYYZXYYZFSOBFSOBFSOBFSOBFSOBFSOBPrimary lobe magnitude (dB)4.335.131.975.124.114.710.373.165.777.010.751.75Primary lobe direction58°58°140°29°21°21°124°48°69°70°109°99°Lobe width (degree)33.334.847.930.232.233.24321.921.119.742.136.4Side lobe level (dB)−3.5−3.2−5.9−6.8−3.3−1.5−1.5−3.0−1.7−1.0−1.7−3.2From Table4, it is determined that the antenna performs much better when it is closer to the human body from a radiation perspective. The results on the XY-plane are very stable in both free space and on-body conditions. Only some variations in gain and directivity can be noticed on the H-plane (YZ). It needs to be mentioned that the table data for “primary lobe magnitude” is rounded up to two decimal places, while others are rounded up to one.


## 4.4. On-Body versus Free Space VSWR Comparison

After placing the antenna 4 mm above the created human body model, the VSWR curve was calculated again and compared with the previously generated “free space” curve. Figure10 shows the comparison of free pace and on-body VSWR curves. The on-body VSWR curve pattern is nearly similar to the free space one, but the on-body curve is noticed to be slightly left-shifted. For the three observing frequencies, results have become much better for 60 GHz, which is down to 1.049 from 1.156 now. At 80 GHz, both free space and the body curve get intertwined, and values are very close. At 100 GHz, it is 1.31, which is better than the 1.37 for free space.Figure 10
Free space versus on-body VSWR curves.


## 4.5. Gain, VSWR, and Efficiency Comparison

In Table5, on-body simulated gain, VSWR, and efficiency results were compared with the previously recorded free space simulation data. Due to the lossy nature of the human body, efficiencies are reduced for on-body scenarios. Lossy tissues of the human body absorb radiation power, which results in a reduction of efficiency from the free space when an antenna is placed on the body. Almost 8% of radiation efficiency is reduced at all three frequencies, which indicates that the gradual increment of frequencies alongside the gradual decrease in efficiency does not have a proportional effect on the antennas surrounding the human body. Voltage standing wave ratio at 60 GHz looks more revised in on-body simulation. In terms of gain, on-body performance data outpaced free space performance in all three frequencies. For all three frequencies (60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz), the gain increases when the antenna is placed on the body. However, at a higher frequency, at 100 GHz, the on-body gain is noticed to be the highest (7.007 dB).Table 5
Gain, VSWR, and efficiency comparison (FS = free space and OB = on-body).
Frequencies60 GHz80 GHz100 GHzFSOBFSOBFSOBRadiation efficiency (%)70.6562.1263.9653.5557.3149.61Total efficiency (%)70.2862.0863.7453.2555.8948.71VSWR1.15641.04911.12341.11031.37241.3105Gain (dB)4.6695.3944.1254.6885.7797.007All the designs and the results in this study are based on computer simulation using professional simulation software, CST Microwave Studio. Unfortunately, these simulated results could not be verified with a real-life fabricated one for lack of scope. However, many published articles have justified their CST Microwave Studio simulated results with real-life measurements and found similar outcomes [19–22].


## 5. Distance-Based Study

To have a clear concept of the effects of the presence of the human body in close proximity to the antenna clearly, a distance-based study was conducted. The antenna was positioned at five different distances from the human body model in this investigation, and the return loss, radiation patterns, and other variables were simulated to see how they were influenced. The results are achieved by placing the antenna 0 mm (close contact), 2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, and finally 8 mm apart from the human body and comparing with free space data. This section is based on the distance-based analysis of those results to understand the characteristics of the proposed super wideband mmWave antenna more precisely.


### 5.1. Return Loss

The antenna's simulated return loss curves at five various distances from the human body model with a free space return loss curve are shown in Figure11. The green curve with triangular marks represents the return loss of 0 mm and is clearly distinguishable from others. It is observed that when the antenna is placed directly on the body, the return loss graph changes dramatically as compared to the free space one. As the antenna is taken 2 mm or more away from the human body, the return loss curve becomes nearly stable. For 6 mm and 8 mm distances, the impact of the human body on the antenna’s return loss curve is very low. The major shape shifting of return loss is done from a distance of 0 mm to 2 mm. It is clear that the variation in the antenna distance from the human body model has an effect on the return loss for this super wide band compact antenna. When the antenna is very close to the body, the effect is stronger, and when it is farther away, the effect is weaker. However, the return loss values for 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz are all less than −10 dB in all circumstances.Figure 11
Return loss from the human body model and free space at various distances.


### 5.2. Radiation Patterns of Different Planes

In Figures12(a)–12(f), the polar plot radiation patterns of this antenna are shown in the XY- and XZ-planes for three different frequencies (60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz) while the antenna was placed at five different distances (0 mm, 2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, and 8 mm). In these graphs of Figures 12(a)–12(f), the free space polar plot radiation patterns are also included for comparison purposes. The radiation pattern is substantially altered, while the antenna is situated 0 mm away from the body, as seen in Figures 12(a)–12(c) in the XY-plane. The main lobe magnitudes at 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz are −11.2 dB, −12 dB, and −12.5 dB, respectively. In this case, the radiation for both planes does not change much due to the close proximity of the human body, but the power level is reduced. It is not ideal to place the antenna on the body directly. In real-life scenarios, the antenna with the wearable sensor and system will be on the dress of the human body. For 2 mm and above distances, the radiation patterns do not change too much. Similarly, in the YZ-plane, radiation patterns are quite distinguishable at a distance of 0 mm rather than at any other distance of 2 mm or more. It shows a similar trend. However, the figure distorts a little abruptly at particular angles in the YZ-plane at higher frequencies as the distance varies. From this distance variation on-body parametric study, it is noted that even at 2 mm distance, the antenna on the body performs well in terms of XY and YZ radiation patterns, and at this distance, acceptable radiation is noticed. The power level of the radiation patterns is reported to be the lowest at 0 mm in all circumstances (antenna direct on the body).Figure 12
Polar plot antenna radiation patterns in the XY-plane at (a) 60 GHz, (b) 80 GHz, and (c) 100 GHz form different distances. Polar plot radiation patterns on YZ-plane at (d) 60 GHz, (e) 80 GHz, and (f) 100 GHz from different distances.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


### 5.3. VSWR from Different Distances

Figure13 depicts the antenna VSWR at various gaps from the human body model. The free space VSWR of this antenna has also been included for comparison purposes. The green line with a triangular mark indicates the voltage standing wave ratio at a 0 mm distance from the human body model. As in the previous results, the VSWR curve also shows that the 0 mm distance curve stands separately from the others, which are 1.1, 1.12, and 1.05 at 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz, respectively. The rest of the curves overlap at several frequencies on the path and fluctuate between 1.02 and 1.66 after 60 GHz.Figure 13
VSWR at various distances from the human body and in free space.


### 5.4. Investigation of Efficiency and Gain

Table6 shows the radiation efficiency, total efficiency, and gain comparison of the antenna at three preselected frequencies (60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz). In Table 6, results of free space, 0 mm, 2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, and 8 mm, are presented. In the previous calculation of this antenna and this table, it is clearly visible that antenna performance is highly influenced when it is directly in contact with the human body. At 0 mm distance, efficiency falls from 4.96 to 4.4 at 60 GHz to 100 GHz. Nevertheless, even just a couple of millimeters away, the performance stays very stable. Therefore, the ideal distance to place this proposed antenna on the body is considered to be 2 mm away from the body. At 2 mm distance from the human body, this antenna performs very well, and the performance parameters are very much at an acceptable level. However, other distances can also be considered. Here, we have commented on the lowest minimum gap from the body to get an acceptable level of performance. At 2 mm distance, this antenna shows 56% radiation efficiency at 60 GHz, and at the same distance, this antenna shows nearly 6.85 dB gain at 100 GHz. Even when it is quite close to the body, this antenna produces interesting results. As the distance between the body and the antenna extends, the performance improves.Table 6
Gain and efficiency comparison.
DistancesFree space0 mm2 mm4 mm6 mm8 mmFrequency (GHz)Radiation efficiency (%)6070.654.9665662.1265.9168.68063.964.9447.4953.5558.5260.4410057.314.40441.2849.6152.7553.8Total efficiency (%)6070.284.95355.9762.0865.8568.518063.744.92447.3753.2558.3860.2810055.894.40140.2148.7151.6752.63Gain (dB)604.669−6.3686.0715.3945.4635.407804.125−4.6655.4134.6884.2534.0181005.779−6.5246.8537.0076.8526.511


## 5.1. Return Loss

The antenna's simulated return loss curves at five various distances from the human body model with a free space return loss curve are shown in Figure11. The green curve with triangular marks represents the return loss of 0 mm and is clearly distinguishable from others. It is observed that when the antenna is placed directly on the body, the return loss graph changes dramatically as compared to the free space one. As the antenna is taken 2 mm or more away from the human body, the return loss curve becomes nearly stable. For 6 mm and 8 mm distances, the impact of the human body on the antenna’s return loss curve is very low. The major shape shifting of return loss is done from a distance of 0 mm to 2 mm. It is clear that the variation in the antenna distance from the human body model has an effect on the return loss for this super wide band compact antenna. When the antenna is very close to the body, the effect is stronger, and when it is farther away, the effect is weaker. However, the return loss values for 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz are all less than −10 dB in all circumstances.Figure 11
Return loss from the human body model and free space at various distances.


## 5.2. Radiation Patterns of Different Planes

In Figures12(a)–12(f), the polar plot radiation patterns of this antenna are shown in the XY- and XZ-planes for three different frequencies (60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz) while the antenna was placed at five different distances (0 mm, 2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, and 8 mm). In these graphs of Figures 12(a)–12(f), the free space polar plot radiation patterns are also included for comparison purposes. The radiation pattern is substantially altered, while the antenna is situated 0 mm away from the body, as seen in Figures 12(a)–12(c) in the XY-plane. The main lobe magnitudes at 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz are −11.2 dB, −12 dB, and −12.5 dB, respectively. In this case, the radiation for both planes does not change much due to the close proximity of the human body, but the power level is reduced. It is not ideal to place the antenna on the body directly. In real-life scenarios, the antenna with the wearable sensor and system will be on the dress of the human body. For 2 mm and above distances, the radiation patterns do not change too much. Similarly, in the YZ-plane, radiation patterns are quite distinguishable at a distance of 0 mm rather than at any other distance of 2 mm or more. It shows a similar trend. However, the figure distorts a little abruptly at particular angles in the YZ-plane at higher frequencies as the distance varies. From this distance variation on-body parametric study, it is noted that even at 2 mm distance, the antenna on the body performs well in terms of XY and YZ radiation patterns, and at this distance, acceptable radiation is noticed. The power level of the radiation patterns is reported to be the lowest at 0 mm in all circumstances (antenna direct on the body).Figure 12
Polar plot antenna radiation patterns in the XY-plane at (a) 60 GHz, (b) 80 GHz, and (c) 100 GHz form different distances. Polar plot radiation patterns on YZ-plane at (d) 60 GHz, (e) 80 GHz, and (f) 100 GHz from different distances.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


## 5.3. VSWR from Different Distances

Figure13 depicts the antenna VSWR at various gaps from the human body model. The free space VSWR of this antenna has also been included for comparison purposes. The green line with a triangular mark indicates the voltage standing wave ratio at a 0 mm distance from the human body model. As in the previous results, the VSWR curve also shows that the 0 mm distance curve stands separately from the others, which are 1.1, 1.12, and 1.05 at 60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz, respectively. The rest of the curves overlap at several frequencies on the path and fluctuate between 1.02 and 1.66 after 60 GHz.Figure 13
VSWR at various distances from the human body and in free space.


## 5.4. Investigation of Efficiency and Gain

Table6 shows the radiation efficiency, total efficiency, and gain comparison of the antenna at three preselected frequencies (60 GHz, 80 GHz, and 100 GHz). In Table 6, results of free space, 0 mm, 2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, and 8 mm, are presented. In the previous calculation of this antenna and this table, it is clearly visible that antenna performance is highly influenced when it is directly in contact with the human body. At 0 mm distance, efficiency falls from 4.96 to 4.4 at 60 GHz to 100 GHz. Nevertheless, even just a couple of millimeters away, the performance stays very stable. Therefore, the ideal distance to place this proposed antenna on the body is considered to be 2 mm away from the body. At 2 mm distance from the human body, this antenna performs very well, and the performance parameters are very much at an acceptable level. However, other distances can also be considered. Here, we have commented on the lowest minimum gap from the body to get an acceptable level of performance. At 2 mm distance, this antenna shows 56% radiation efficiency at 60 GHz, and at the same distance, this antenna shows nearly 6.85 dB gain at 100 GHz. Even when it is quite close to the body, this antenna produces interesting results. As the distance between the body and the antenna extends, the performance improves.Table 6
Gain and efficiency comparison.
DistancesFree space0 mm2 mm4 mm6 mm8 mmFrequency (GHz)Radiation efficiency (%)6070.654.9665662.1265.9168.68063.964.9447.4953.5558.5260.4410057.314.40441.2849.6152.7553.8Total efficiency (%)6070.284.95355.9762.0865.8568.518063.744.92447.3753.2558.3860.2810055.894.40140.2148.7151.6752.63Gain (dB)604.669−6.3686.0715.3945.4635.407804.125−4.6655.4134.6884.2534.0181005.779−6.5246.8537.0076.8526.511


## 6. Conclusion

In this paper, a novel and very tiny design of a multiple band super wide band millimeter wave antenna is presented. Simulations were done with the newly designed antenna in both free space and the human body with the help of modeling human body structures. The results were analyzed and compared. Simulations were done at three different frequencies of the mmWave spectrum (EHF range) and found promising results. The notable part was that the design is less vulnerable to the presence of the lossy human body, which makes it suitable and a potential candidate for body-centric communications. With a volume of 8 mm × 5.12 mm x 1.57 mm, the antenna is very small. Due to its very tiny size and printed structure, it can be equipped with other lightweight, portable devices or can be placed on a human body. Moreover, multiple band operability made the antenna unique and widened its possibilities and area of application. The proposed antenna has a super wideband impedance bandwidth, which will be an excellent candidate for high data rate applications. According to the knowledge of the authors of this paper, this antenna achieved the most wideband bandwidth as it works over a large frequency spectrum with a return loss of less than −10 dB. This antenna is the smallest mmWave antenna so far found in the open literature. This proposed antenna design and study in this paper is a novel work in mmWave antennas.Further distance-based study clarifies the antenna's in-depth nature, which helped determine where and how it could serve in body-centric communications. We know the body area network (BAN) or BCN consists of three types of communication: in-body, off-body, and on-body communications [7]. When the sensor is implanted in the body and made to communicate with the external module, it is known as in-body communication. When the communication device is placed on the human body (contact or contactless close proximity, e.g., 2 mm; can be of a thread or fabric thickness) and set to communicate with similar on-body sensors, it is known as on-body communication. If one of them is set outside the body to transfer and receive data, it is known as “off-body communication.” From the final distance-based analysis, it can be said that the performance of this proposed antenna is mostly suitable for on-body communications in body-centric networks (BCNs). In the future, this antenna could be designed on a textile substrate. In addition, the bending performance of the antenna can be investigated.



---

*Source: 8725263-2021-11-18.xml*