# Local and Systemic Immune Responses to Salmonella in Genetically Susceptible I/St Mice after Mucosal Challenge

Authors: N. V. Kobets; L. N. Nesterenko; D. V. Balunets
Journal: ISRN Immunology
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

It was previously demonstrated that mice of I/StSnEgYCit (I/St) strain are more susceptible to tuberculosis infection than A/SnYCit (A/Sn) mice, and this susceptibility was controlled by a few interacting QTLs mapped to chromosomes 3, 9, 17. It was also shown, that I/St mice displayed higher susceptibility to acute salmonella disease after intraperitoneal challenge withS. enterica serovar Typhimurium. Genetic mapping showed the involvement of Tbs2 (D9Mit89) loci in control of both salmonella and tuberculosis infections. In this study we define the immunological correlates of susceptibility in I/St mice after oral administration of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium. We found that resistance/susceptibility in I/St and A/Sn mice in our experiments correlated with differential pattern of early local and systemic responses of innate cells and specifically with higher involvement of Gr-1+ cells in local responses of resistant mice. This correlated with higher mucosal antibody production in A/Sn mice compared to I/St. I/St mice had predominant local involvement of CD11c+ cells and lack of mucosal antibodies. CD11c+ cells were the major type of cells that facilitated dissemination of salmonella to the target organs, while Gr-1+ cells contributed to exaggerated systemic inflammatory responses later in the course of infection. Our observations regarding the role of different cell populations in local and systemic immunity in susceptible and resistant mice are of importance for understanding of salmonella-induced cellular pathology and development of the strategy of its control.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Salmonella are intracellular gram-negative bacteria found ubiquitously in nature and still representing a major public health problem [1]. Over 16 million cases of salmonella are associated with enteric fever, and 600000 deaths from untreated infection are reported annually in developing countries worldwide [1]. An increased incidence of nontyphoid salmonella infections with most cases tracing back to food contamination is experienced in industrialized countries [1]. The risks and outcome of salmonella infection are influenced by many factors such as antimicrobials, integrity of the host endogenous flora, loss of the gastric acid barrier, HIV infection, and host genetics [1]. Some of mouse salmonella resistance genes such as Ity, Lps, and xid were widely studied in the past decades [2–4]. Some new loci, such as Tbc2 (D9Mit89), were identified recently [5]. However, the links between susceptible host phenotype and newly identified locus were not studied in detail.Salmonella is an enteric pathogen, and the control of bacterial colonization at mucosal surfaces depends on rapid activation of the local innate and adaptive immunity and recruitment of a wide range of cells to the site of infection [6]. Besides, the genetically mediated control of pathogen dissemination from mucosal surfaces to systemic organs is a key point for antibacterial protection. Complex interplay of different cellular subsets (neutrophils, dendritic cells, monocytes, B and T cells) at mucosal sites may lead to either transfer of bacteria to systemic lymphoid organs [7, 8] or preventing them from leaving mucosal organized tissue (MALT) [9]. On the other hand some factors of bacterial virulence, such as products of Spi-1 and Spi-2 loci, contribute differentially to infectious process at systemic and mucosal sites of immune system [10].Mucosal IgA antibodies are the most abundant type of antibodies in mice and are the first to encounter mucosal pathogens even before their entry into mucosal tissue and as such are being extensively studied [11, 12]. However, the differences in the local cellular mechanisms mediating the control of infection in resistant mice compared to susceptible and the possible role of local defenses in the outcome of infection have not been fully assessed.Recently it was shown that I/St and A/Sn mice opposite in their resistance toM. tuberculosis [13] display the same pattern of resistance to i.p. infection with S. enterica, serovar Typhimurium [14].In this study we developed a model of mucosal salmonella infection in I/St and A/Sn mice and analyzed the strain-dependent susceptibility to oral salmonella challenge and early innate and specific B-cell responses at mucosal and systemic lymphoid sites of both mouse strains.As for systemic infection we showed that these strains are opposite in their resistance after oral infectious challenge with salmonella. We also showed that these strains of mice had different cellular patterns of early local innate response with preferentially CD11c+ cells involvement in I/St mice and preferentially Gr-1+ cells involvement in A/Sn mice that probably resulted in differential type of early acquired immune response and specifically early local IgA production observed only in A/Sn mice. Additionally, we showed that high bacterial load and splenomegaly observed in susceptible mice at day 7 after oral infection correlated with higher level of bright Gr-1+ cells in spleen and high level of splenic IgA producing cells.Our newly developed model of orally induced chronic salmonella infection with unique opposite pattern of local and systemic immune reactions in susceptible and resistant mice can be further exploited as a valuable tool in discovery of novel antibacterial therapeutics.


## 2. Methods

### 2.1. Mice and Infection

Mice of inbred strains I/StSnEgYCit (I/St) and A/JSnYCit (A/Sn) were maintained under conventional conditions at the Animal Facilities of Gamaleya Research Institute for epidemiology and microbiology, Moscow, Russia, in accordance with national guidelines. Water and food were providedad libitum. Male mice of 14–16 g body weight were used in our experiments. S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (var. C53) was grown in broth overnight, centrifuged, resuspended in sterile saline. Serial dilutions were plated on SS-agar for 1.5 h to estimate colony-forming unit (CFU) numbers, while the bulk sample was stored at 4°C. The sample was diluted in sterile saline to achieve a concentration of 105 CFU/mL and 0.2 mL (2 × 104 CFU/mouse) was injected per os via gavage needle. Mortality was monitored daily. To estimate salmonella loads, serial dilutions of PP, MLN and spleen homogenates were plated onto SS-agar. Colonies were counted following 12 h incubation at 37°C.


### 2.2. GFP-Labeled Salmonella

To define the intracellular distribution of salmonella in CD11c+ and F4/80+ cells, we performed a separate set of experiments where we used GFP-labeled C53-1 stain of Salmonella, containing GFP-inserted tt115 vector, resistant to kanamycin and ampicillin (kind gift of Professor V. Lunin, laboratory of active nanostructures, Gamaleya Research Institute, Moscow). In these experiments, spleen cells were stained with R-PE-labeled anti-CD11c and anti-F4/80 antibodies as described below.


### 2.3. H&E Histopathology and Immunohistochemistry

Spleens were examined for pathology seven days after infection. Spleen tissue was frozen in the regimen of −60°C to −20°C temperature gradient in the electronic Cryotome (ThermoShandon, Astmoor Runcorn, Cheshire, UK), and serial 8 mm thick sections were made. Sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin and further examined for the signs of pathology.To detect Gr-1-positive cells, sections were preliminary blocked in 1% BSA for 20 min and stained with FITC conjugated anti-Gr-1 antibodies (clone RB6-8C5, Miltenyi Biotech, Germany) (1/200) or isotype control for 30 min and washed in PBS 3 times for 10 min. Sections were mounted in Vectashield mounting medium (Vector laboratories, Burlingame, Ca, USA), sealed, examined, and photographed using Nikon Eclipse 50i microscope.


### 2.4. ELISPOT Assay

Single-cell suspensions were obtained individually from Peyer’s patches (PP), mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN), and spleens of mice as described previously [15]. Sterile filter Millipore plates were coated with heat-killed salmonella, washed, and blocked with RPMI-1640 containing 10% FBS (HyClone, Logan, UT). 2 × 106 cells/wells from three individual animals per group were added to salmonella-coated plate and cultured for 18 h in CO2 incubator. Then plates were washed and stained with alkaline-phosphatase-labeled monoclonal antibodies against mouse IgA, IgG1, and IgG2a (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) washed, and incubated with BCIP/NBT following stop reagent (0.1 M HCl). Nitrocellulose filters were further scanned with Epson Perfection Photo scanner and analyzed.


### 2.5. Flow Cytometry

MLN, PP and spleens from I/St and A/Sn mice were analyzed at the time points as described below. Lymphoid organs were incubated with collagenase (Invitrogen, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for 30 minutes on ice, and single-cell suspensions were prepared with the help of Nitex mesh using a syringe plunger. After centrifugation and washing, cells were resuspended in PBS supplemented with 0.5% BSA and 0.01% NaN3 and incubated for 5 min at 4°C with CD16/CD32 mAbs (clone 2.4G2, BD Biosciences, USA) to block Fc-receptors. Cells were then stained with the following directly conjugated antibodies, according to the manufacturer’s instructions: R-PE labeled anti-CD11c or F4/80 (clones N418 and BM8, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), FITC-anti-CD8a (clone 53.67, E-bioscience, San Diego, CA), and FITC-anti-Gr-1 (clone RB6-8C5, Miltenyi Biotech, Germany). Dead cells were excluded with 7-AAD (E-bioscience, San Diego, CA). Two-color staining with either R-PE labeled anti-CD11c and FITC-labeled anti-CD8 antibodies or R-PE labeled anti-F4/80 and FITC-labeled anti-Gr-1 antibodies was performed in our experiments where we did not use GFP-labeled salmonella. In experiments with GFP-labeled salmonella, we used only R-PE labeled anti-CD11c+ and anti-F4/80 antibodies. Stained cells (104 cells per sample) were washed twice and analyzed by flow cytometry, using a FACS Calibur cytometer, CellQuestPro software (BD Biosciences, USA) for acquisition and FCS Express V3 software (De Novo Software, Los Angeles, CA) for analysis. Cells were gated based on their expression of either CD11c and CD8 or Gr-1 and F4/80. In experiments with GFP-labeled salmonella gating was performed based on expression of GFP and CD11c or F4/80.


### 2.6. Statistics

All experiments were performed using at least three samples per group and repeated 3 times. Mean values and standard deviations were calculated using Excel software. The statistical significance was estimated by Student’st test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.


## 2.1. Mice and Infection

Mice of inbred strains I/StSnEgYCit (I/St) and A/JSnYCit (A/Sn) were maintained under conventional conditions at the Animal Facilities of Gamaleya Research Institute for epidemiology and microbiology, Moscow, Russia, in accordance with national guidelines. Water and food were providedad libitum. Male mice of 14–16 g body weight were used in our experiments. S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (var. C53) was grown in broth overnight, centrifuged, resuspended in sterile saline. Serial dilutions were plated on SS-agar for 1.5 h to estimate colony-forming unit (CFU) numbers, while the bulk sample was stored at 4°C. The sample was diluted in sterile saline to achieve a concentration of 105 CFU/mL and 0.2 mL (2 × 104 CFU/mouse) was injected per os via gavage needle. Mortality was monitored daily. To estimate salmonella loads, serial dilutions of PP, MLN and spleen homogenates were plated onto SS-agar. Colonies were counted following 12 h incubation at 37°C.


## 2.2. GFP-Labeled Salmonella

To define the intracellular distribution of salmonella in CD11c+ and F4/80+ cells, we performed a separate set of experiments where we used GFP-labeled C53-1 stain of Salmonella, containing GFP-inserted tt115 vector, resistant to kanamycin and ampicillin (kind gift of Professor V. Lunin, laboratory of active nanostructures, Gamaleya Research Institute, Moscow). In these experiments, spleen cells were stained with R-PE-labeled anti-CD11c and anti-F4/80 antibodies as described below.


## 2.3. H&E Histopathology and Immunohistochemistry

Spleens were examined for pathology seven days after infection. Spleen tissue was frozen in the regimen of −60°C to −20°C temperature gradient in the electronic Cryotome (ThermoShandon, Astmoor Runcorn, Cheshire, UK), and serial 8 mm thick sections were made. Sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin and further examined for the signs of pathology.To detect Gr-1-positive cells, sections were preliminary blocked in 1% BSA for 20 min and stained with FITC conjugated anti-Gr-1 antibodies (clone RB6-8C5, Miltenyi Biotech, Germany) (1/200) or isotype control for 30 min and washed in PBS 3 times for 10 min. Sections were mounted in Vectashield mounting medium (Vector laboratories, Burlingame, Ca, USA), sealed, examined, and photographed using Nikon Eclipse 50i microscope.


## 2.4. ELISPOT Assay

Single-cell suspensions were obtained individually from Peyer’s patches (PP), mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN), and spleens of mice as described previously [15]. Sterile filter Millipore plates were coated with heat-killed salmonella, washed, and blocked with RPMI-1640 containing 10% FBS (HyClone, Logan, UT). 2 × 106 cells/wells from three individual animals per group were added to salmonella-coated plate and cultured for 18 h in CO2 incubator. Then plates were washed and stained with alkaline-phosphatase-labeled monoclonal antibodies against mouse IgA, IgG1, and IgG2a (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) washed, and incubated with BCIP/NBT following stop reagent (0.1 M HCl). Nitrocellulose filters were further scanned with Epson Perfection Photo scanner and analyzed.


## 2.5. Flow Cytometry

MLN, PP and spleens from I/St and A/Sn mice were analyzed at the time points as described below. Lymphoid organs were incubated with collagenase (Invitrogen, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for 30 minutes on ice, and single-cell suspensions were prepared with the help of Nitex mesh using a syringe plunger. After centrifugation and washing, cells were resuspended in PBS supplemented with 0.5% BSA and 0.01% NaN3 and incubated for 5 min at 4°C with CD16/CD32 mAbs (clone 2.4G2, BD Biosciences, USA) to block Fc-receptors. Cells were then stained with the following directly conjugated antibodies, according to the manufacturer’s instructions: R-PE labeled anti-CD11c or F4/80 (clones N418 and BM8, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), FITC-anti-CD8a (clone 53.67, E-bioscience, San Diego, CA), and FITC-anti-Gr-1 (clone RB6-8C5, Miltenyi Biotech, Germany). Dead cells were excluded with 7-AAD (E-bioscience, San Diego, CA). Two-color staining with either R-PE labeled anti-CD11c and FITC-labeled anti-CD8 antibodies or R-PE labeled anti-F4/80 and FITC-labeled anti-Gr-1 antibodies was performed in our experiments where we did not use GFP-labeled salmonella. In experiments with GFP-labeled salmonella, we used only R-PE labeled anti-CD11c+ and anti-F4/80 antibodies. Stained cells (104 cells per sample) were washed twice and analyzed by flow cytometry, using a FACS Calibur cytometer, CellQuestPro software (BD Biosciences, USA) for acquisition and FCS Express V3 software (De Novo Software, Los Angeles, CA) for analysis. Cells were gated based on their expression of either CD11c and CD8 or Gr-1 and F4/80. In experiments with GFP-labeled salmonella gating was performed based on expression of GFP and CD11c or F4/80.


## 2.6. Statistics

All experiments were performed using at least three samples per group and repeated 3 times. Mean values and standard deviations were calculated using Excel software. The statistical significance was estimated by Student’st test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.


## 3. Results and Discussion

Recently we have demonstrated that I/St mice display higher susceptibility to acute disease caused by low-dose (0–50 CFU) intraperitoneal salmonella challenge compared to A/Sn mice [14]. Here we report on the course of infection and organ colonization in I/St and A/Sn mice after more natural oral administration of 105 CFU S. enterica serovar Typhimurium. In this study, we have found that per os infection with moderately virulent S. entericaserovar Typhimurium strain (C53) of both mouse strains resulted in at least 4-week long pathogen persistence in different lymphoid organs (data is not shown). Initially, Peyer’s patches, mesenteric lymph nodes, and feces of mice were identically colonized with salmonella, however, between day 5 to 21 after challenge 3 log intrastrain difference in oral LD50 was revealed: 1.0 × 105 CFU for I/St mice and 5.0 × 108 CFU for A/Sn mice. To the end of these experiments (week 4 after infection) salmonella was found predominantly in MLN in line with earlier observations on pathogen localization in chronic salmonella infection [16]. At day 7 after infection, we have observed the maximum level of splenomegaly in I/St mice (Figure 1). Mean spleen weight of intact I/St control was 41 mg compared to 320 mg in infected mice at day 7 after infection. Mean spleen weight of intact A/Sn controls was 76 mg compared to 190 mg at the same time point that made only 2.5 times increase compared to 8 times spleen increase in I/St mice. Later in the course of infection, these interstrain differences disappeared. The pattern of pathological response in susceptible and resistant mice at day 7 PI correlated with the most pronounced difference in salmonella concentrations in spleens of infected mice (5 × 106 CFU—I/St; 2 × 103 CFU—A/Sn).Figure 1
Spleens of I/St and A/Sn at day 7 after infection with S. typhimurium and intact controls: 1 Spleen of I/St mouse, day 7 after infection; 2 I/St-intact control. 3 Spleen of A/Sn mouse, day 7 after infection; 4 A/Sn-intact control.To further analyze interstrain differences in spleen pathology, we performed H&E staining of spleen sections from I/St and A/Sn mice at day 7 after infection. As shown in Figure2(a), B-cell follicles observed in spleens of both strains had secondary structure at this time point and were more abundant compared to intact controls; however, the increase in B-cell follicles sizes following per os salmonella infection was more pronounced in I/St mice. Cellular infiltration around follicle border was also more pronounced in spleens of I/St mice (Figure 2(b)). To assess cellular involvement in the inflammatory component of the anti-salmonella response, we stained spleen sections with FITC-conjugated anti-Gr-1 antibodies. We found Gr-1-positive cells diffusely distributed around B-cell follicles in controls of both mouse strains (data is not shown). In spleens of infected mice from both mouse strains, we observed dense infiltrates of Gr-1-positive cells (Figure 2(c)); however, in spleens of I/St mice, they were more pronounced and hallmarked the sites of necrotic foci. The similar pattern of histopathology with dual B-cell and Gr-1-positive cell involvement was reported in other bacterial models including M. avium, M. tuberculosis, L. monocytogenes, and Salmonella [17–19] that might indicate general mechanisms underlying the susceptibility to bacterial infection.(a) H&E staining of spleens from A/Sn and I/St mice at day 7 after infection, multiplication ×10. (b) Close up of inflammatory elements in spleens of I/St and A/Sn mice, multiplication ×40. (c) Anti-Gr-1 staining in spleens of I/St and I/Sn mice, multiplication ×40.
(a)
B cell follicles
(b)
Inflammation foci
(c)
Dense neutrophil infiltratesEfficiency of salmonella dissemination to the target organs depends largely on the type of the cells that harbor pathogen [20]. To this end, we have analyzed the distribution of GFP-labeled salmonella in CD11c+ and F4/80+ which represent major in vivo cellular targets of infection. Flow cytometry analysis of spleen CD11c+ and F4/80+ cell populations was performed 48 hours after infectious challenge. As shown in the Table 1, I/St had higher level of GFP+ cells in spleens compared to A/Sn mice. Higher level of GFP-labeled salmonella was observed in CD11c+ cells of I/St mice (12% in I/St and 1.2% A/Sn), and the number of recruited CD11c+ cells in spleens of I/St mice was also higher compared to A/Sn mice (Table 1).Table 1
Recruitment of CD11c+ and F4/80+ cells into the spleens of mice infected per os with GFP-labeled salmonella.
% of CD11c+
% of F4/80+
% GFP+ CD11c+
% GFP+ F4/80+
control A/Sn
0.67
±
0.01
2.87
±
0.11
0,21
±
0.02
0.11
±
0.3
Sal A/Sn
2.9
±
0.1
4.14
±
0.01
1.2
±
0.25
2.6
±
0.1
control I/St
2.11
±
0.02
0.51
±
0.03
0.11
±
0.04
0.13 ± 0.2
Sal I/St
14.26
±
0.122
5.47
±
0.15
12
±
1.5
3.38
±
0.2As we observed the greater level of recruitment of CD11c+ cells to the spleens of I/St mice (shown in Table 1), we further analyzed intrastrain differences in the cell subset distribution in local lymphoid tissue after oral salmonella challenge. Interestingly, we did not observe any increase in the numbers of “myeloid” (CD11c+, CD8a−) dendritic cells in both mouse strains though the level of these cells was higher in PP of intact I/St mice (data is not shown). As shown in the Figure 3, the level of “plasmacytoid” CD11c+CD8a+ dendritic cells was increased in PP of both mouse strains at day 3 after infection, though was higher in I/St mice. No apparent increase in Gr1+ or F4/80+ cells was observed in PP of I/St mice, while the number of these cells was increased in PP of A/Sn mice. The similar pattern of predominantly CD11c+ cell responses was observed in MLN of I/St mice compared predominantly Gr-1+  и  F4/80+ responses seen in resistant A/Sn mice. As we did not observe CD11c+Gr-1+ cells either in local lymphoid tissues or in spleens of salmonella-infected A/Sn or I/St mice before (data is not shown), we did not analyze this subpopulation of cells in this study.Figure 3
Distribution of CD11c+CD8a+, F4/80+, and Gr-1+ cells in Peyer’s patches and mesenterial lymph nodes at day 3 after oral infection. Light bars: controls, black bars: infected mice. (a)–(c) cell distribution in PP; (d)–(f) cell distribution in MLN. *Statistically significant difference, P<0.05.Thus, early after oral challenge (day 3 after infection), we observed predominant recruitment of CD11c+ cells to the local lymphoid organs (PP and MLN) in I/St mice, while in A/Sn mice Gr1+ and F4/80+ cells were the major local responders with no apparent involvement of CD11c+ cells.As IgA response is the earliest and the most abundant at mucosal sites and generally assumed as protective, we further studied IgA-producing cells in I/St and A/Sn mice both locally (PP) and systemically (spleens) in mice infected per os with 105 CFU of salmonella at days 3, 5, and 7 after infection. We also analyzed salmonella-specific IgG2a- and IgG1-producing cells in the same lymphoid organs. As shown in Figure 4, A/Sn mice had higher level of IgA-producing cells in PP compared to I/St at day 3 after infection that probably adds to their antibacterial resistance potential. I/St mice had higher level of IgA-, IgG2a-, and IgG1-producing cells in spleen at day 7, and this correlated with higher bacterial load and splenomegaly in susceptible mice.Figure 4
Numbers of IgA-, IgG2a-, and IgG1-producing cells in PP ((a), (b), and (c)) and spleens ((d), (e), and (f)) of I/St and A/Sn mice. Light bars: day 3, black bars: day 5, grey bars: day 7. *Statistically significant difference,P<0.05.


## 4. Conclusions

In this study, we found that susceptible to salmonella I/St mice are defective in their local innate responses to salmonella. They have lower levels of Gr-1+ and F4/80+ cells in Peyer’s patches and mesenterial lymph nodes and reduced numbers of IgA-producing cells in Peyer’s patches compared to resistant A/Sn mice. In the same time, I/St mice had higher levels of CD11c+ cells in Peyer’s patches and MLN. We also showed that numbers of CD11c+ bearing GFP-labeled salmonella in spleens of I/St mice were higher compared to A/Sn mice. Our results suggest that predominantly CD11c+ pattern of cell response with lower involvement of Gr-1+ and F4/80+ cells in susceptible mice might contribute to their genetically mediated susceptibility to salmonella. However, direct connection between observed pattern of innate responses and susceptibility in these mice has to be established.



---

*Source: 865671-2013-06-02.xml*