# Synthesis of Antibodies-Conjugated Fluorescent Dye-Doped Silica Nanoparticles for a Rapid Single Step Detection ofCampylobacter jejuni in Live Poultry

Authors: Wachira Tansub; Kooranee Tuitemwong; Pichet Limsuwan; Supannee Theparoonrat; Pravate Tuitemwong
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

The preparation of antibodies-conjugated fluorescent dye-doped silica nanoparticles (FDS-NPs) was developed to detectCampylobacter jejuni cells under a fluorescence microscope. The particles prepared by sol-gel microemulsion techniques have a round shape with an average size of 43 ± 4 nm. They were highly photo stable and could emit strong orange fluorescent for 60 min.  Both amine- and carboxyl-functionalized properties were evident from FTIR and FT Raman spectra. The FDS-NPs conjugated with antibodies against C. jejuni were well dispersed in PBS solution at 20 mM of NaCl. The conjugation with monoclonal antibodies against C. jejuni was successful. The direct observation of the antibodies-conjugated FDS-NPs- that bounds C. jejuni with Petroff Hausser counting chamber at 40x was clear. The different focus lengths clearly separated bound and unbound FDS-NPs under the microscope. We successfully synthesis the bio-conjugated dye doped silica nanoparticles for C. jejuni that are easy to use and giving clear detection in due time.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Campylobacteriosis is increasing and becomes one of the most frequently reported zoonotic diseases in humans worldwide. Its overall incidence was 54.6 cases per 100,000 inhabitants in the EU and 64.3 per 100,000 inhabitants in Belgium [1]. Its true incidence is uncertain since many unreported infections occur [2]. Ninety-one percent of human isolates in EU were identified as Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni (hereafter C. jejuni), while Campylobacter coli accounts for most of the remaining cases. The heavy global burden of campylobacteriosis worldwide demands for development of more rapid, automatic, and sensitive detection methods. Traditional methods for the detection of pathogenic bacteria involve preenrichment, selective enrichment, biochemical screening, and serological confirmation [3]. This process is laborious and time consuming, especially for the bacteria like C. jejuni that requires special condition for growth. Many methods have been developed for rapid detection of pathogenic bacteria, including PCR [4], ELISA [5], piezoelectric biosensors [6], and amperometric biosensors [7].Antibodies conjugated fluorescent dye-doped silica nanoparticles (FDS-NPs) have been developed for ultrasensitive bioassays [8–10]. Each nanoparticle encapsulates thousands of fluorescent dye molecules in a protective silica matrix, providing a highly amplified and reproducible signal for fluorescence-based bioanalysis. The bioconjugated nanoparticles enable significant amplification of the analytical signal compared to the conventional immunoassay. This is because of the many dye molecules inside each nanoparticle attached to the antibody molecule. There are many surface antigens available for specific recognition to the bacterium by using antibody-conjugated nanoparticles. Therefore, thousands of nanoparticles can bind to each bacterium, thereby producing a greatly amplified bright signal. The nanoparticles could be used in an assay tool, enabling the detection of one bacterium cell per given sample in a very short time (less than 20 min) with a spectrofluorometer [9]. However, the high sensitivity provided by the fluorescence signal enhancement, selectivity, and reproducibility of nanoparticle-based bioassays can be diminished by the tendency of the silica nanoparticles to agglomerate irreversibly and cause nonspecific binding. These phenomena were due to the large surface area of the nanoparticles, as compared to those of dye molecules. The surface modification could be resulted in excess active functional groups, which are capable of binding to or interacting with various chemical and biological species and then lead to false positive signals. Thus, an important factor in the design of bioconjugated nanoparticles for the attachment to bacteria or biomolecules is to control covalent attachment of desired functional groups onto the particle surface [11]. To obtain successful and reproducible detection of biological targets using these fluorescent labels, the silica nanoparticles must be well dispersed in aqueous solution with minimal to no aggregation and nonspecific binding to biomolecules or substrates. The objective of this study was to establish synthesis and characterization of FDS-NPs without aggregation leading to the single-step detection of C. jejuni in bioconjugated dye-doped silica nanoparticles.


## 2. Methodology

### 2.1. Materials

The nanoparticles were prepared using microemulsion method modified from that reported by Bagwe et al. [11] and Suwanachart [12]. Briefly, tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS), Triton X-100, Tris (2,2′-bipyridyl) dichlororuthenium(II) hexahydrate (Rubpy), succinic anhydride, Z-morpholinoethanesulfonic acid (Mes), BSA, 1-ethyl-3-3(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride, and N-hydroxysuccinimide were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). Trimethoxysilylpropyldiethylenetriamine, and N-(trimethoxysilylpropyl)-ethylenediamine were purchased from S.M. Chemicals (USA).Campylobacter jejuni was obtained from the Department of Medical Science, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.Ammonium hydroxide (28–30 wt%),N,N-dimethylformamide, and affinity purified monoclonal mouse anti-Campylobacter jejuni(mAbs) (isotype IgG1; clone 5E229) were purchased from Abcam (USA). It was supplied as a liquid in PBS (phosphate buffer saline), pH 7.2 with 0.1% sodium azide added. It was highly specific to C. jejuni and nonreactive with H. pylori, E. coli, Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia, orCitrobacter. The antibody was stored at −20°C until use.


### 2.2. Synthesis and Characterization of Silica Nanoparticles

The microemulsion solution was prepared by mixing 7.5 mL cyclohexane, 1.80 mL n-Hexanol, 1.77 mL Triton X-100, and 0.48 mL 20 mM Rubpy dye in water for 20 min at room temperature. Then, 0.10 mL TEOS was added. Hydrolysis and condensation reactions were initiated by adding 0.09 mL 30% NH4OH (30 wt%). The reaction was allowed to stir for 24 h. After reaction was completed, one volume of acetone was added to break microemulsion and recover the particles. The particles were washed with 95% ethanol (3 times) and deionized water (2 times). Ultrasonic bath was used to disperse the particles in the solutions. The particles were dried at 120°C for 2 h and stored in amber bottles.The fluorescent dye-doped silica nanoparticles in 95% ethanol were characterized by transmission electron microscope (TEM) (Jeol Model JEM-1230, USA) for the size, morphology, and distribution. The nanoparticles were also characterized for their excitation, emission, and photostability by spectrofluorometer technique (Nikon Model Eclipse E600, Japan). SEM EDS (Leo Model 1455P, Germany) was employed to study the particles compositions, and X-ray Diffractometer (Bruker Model D8 Advance, Germany, 40 kV, steptime 0.4 and stepsize 0.02 degree) was used for the analysis of the structure.


### 2.3. Determination of Aggregation of the Silica Nanoparticles

The 5 mL of particles (10 mg/mL) was mixed with 100μg/mL antibody. The mixture was shaken regularly at 200 rpm at 18°C for 2–4 hours. Then, particles were washed in quenching solution once and centrifuged at 4500 rpm at 18°C for 10 min. They were distributed in 5 mL quenching solution and regularly shaken at 18°C for 30 min. Then they were washed with the storage buffer 1 time and centrifuged at 4500 rpm at 18°C for 10 min. The particles were dispersed in NaCl solution at concentrations of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 mM. The particles were then analyzed for zeta potential by the NanoSizer machine at the Department of Physics, Kasetsart University, Thailand.


### 2.4. Chemical Modification of the Nanoparticle Surface

The surface of FDS-NPs that was chemically modified before mAbs againstC. jejuni was immobilized onto the nanoparticles. The methods were modified from that reported by Zhao et al. [9], Bagwe et al. [11], and Suwanachart [12].Amine-functionalized group was added on the nanoparticle surfaces using 32 mg of silica nanoparticles washed with deionized water (2 times) and 1 mM acetic acid (once). The particles were dispersed with ultrasonication and reacted with 20 mL of 10% (3-aminopropyl) trimethoxysilyl propyldiethylenetriamine in 1 mM acetic acid (APTS) for 30 min at room temperature (25°C) with continuous stirring. The particles were stored in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.3) at 4°C.The amine-functionalized nanoparticles were then thoroughly washed three times by deionized water and washed withN,N-dimethylformamide and further reacted with 10% succinic anhydride in N,N-dimethylformamide solution under nitrogen gas for 6 h with continuous stirring. The particles were analyzed to verify the attachment of the functional groups on the surface using Fourier Transformed mid Infrared Spectrophotometer (range of 4500–450 cm−1 resolution 4.0 cm−1, No of Scan 16) (FTIR, Perkin Elmer Model Spectrum One, USA) and FT-Raman (750 mW, Res 4.0 cm−1, no of scan 1000; Bruker IFS 66 v/s, USA).


### 2.5. Immobilization of Antibodies on Nanoparticle Surface

An aliquot of 5 mL of 0.1 mg/mL nanoparticles was reacted with 2 mL of 5μg protein/mL of the antibody for 2–4 h at room temperature with continuous stirring, followed by washing with 0.1 M PBS buffer pH 7.3. The antibody-conjugated nanoparticles surface was blocked with 1% BSA and washed in 0.1 M PBS before use.


## 2.1. Materials

The nanoparticles were prepared using microemulsion method modified from that reported by Bagwe et al. [11] and Suwanachart [12]. Briefly, tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS), Triton X-100, Tris (2,2′-bipyridyl) dichlororuthenium(II) hexahydrate (Rubpy), succinic anhydride, Z-morpholinoethanesulfonic acid (Mes), BSA, 1-ethyl-3-3(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride, and N-hydroxysuccinimide were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). Trimethoxysilylpropyldiethylenetriamine, and N-(trimethoxysilylpropyl)-ethylenediamine were purchased from S.M. Chemicals (USA).Campylobacter jejuni was obtained from the Department of Medical Science, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.Ammonium hydroxide (28–30 wt%),N,N-dimethylformamide, and affinity purified monoclonal mouse anti-Campylobacter jejuni(mAbs) (isotype IgG1; clone 5E229) were purchased from Abcam (USA). It was supplied as a liquid in PBS (phosphate buffer saline), pH 7.2 with 0.1% sodium azide added. It was highly specific to C. jejuni and nonreactive with H. pylori, E. coli, Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia, orCitrobacter. The antibody was stored at −20°C until use.


## 2.2. Synthesis and Characterization of Silica Nanoparticles

The microemulsion solution was prepared by mixing 7.5 mL cyclohexane, 1.80 mL n-Hexanol, 1.77 mL Triton X-100, and 0.48 mL 20 mM Rubpy dye in water for 20 min at room temperature. Then, 0.10 mL TEOS was added. Hydrolysis and condensation reactions were initiated by adding 0.09 mL 30% NH4OH (30 wt%). The reaction was allowed to stir for 24 h. After reaction was completed, one volume of acetone was added to break microemulsion and recover the particles. The particles were washed with 95% ethanol (3 times) and deionized water (2 times). Ultrasonic bath was used to disperse the particles in the solutions. The particles were dried at 120°C for 2 h and stored in amber bottles.The fluorescent dye-doped silica nanoparticles in 95% ethanol were characterized by transmission electron microscope (TEM) (Jeol Model JEM-1230, USA) for the size, morphology, and distribution. The nanoparticles were also characterized for their excitation, emission, and photostability by spectrofluorometer technique (Nikon Model Eclipse E600, Japan). SEM EDS (Leo Model 1455P, Germany) was employed to study the particles compositions, and X-ray Diffractometer (Bruker Model D8 Advance, Germany, 40 kV, steptime 0.4 and stepsize 0.02 degree) was used for the analysis of the structure.


## 2.3. Determination of Aggregation of the Silica Nanoparticles

The 5 mL of particles (10 mg/mL) was mixed with 100μg/mL antibody. The mixture was shaken regularly at 200 rpm at 18°C for 2–4 hours. Then, particles were washed in quenching solution once and centrifuged at 4500 rpm at 18°C for 10 min. They were distributed in 5 mL quenching solution and regularly shaken at 18°C for 30 min. Then they were washed with the storage buffer 1 time and centrifuged at 4500 rpm at 18°C for 10 min. The particles were dispersed in NaCl solution at concentrations of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 mM. The particles were then analyzed for zeta potential by the NanoSizer machine at the Department of Physics, Kasetsart University, Thailand.


## 2.4. Chemical Modification of the Nanoparticle Surface

The surface of FDS-NPs that was chemically modified before mAbs againstC. jejuni was immobilized onto the nanoparticles. The methods were modified from that reported by Zhao et al. [9], Bagwe et al. [11], and Suwanachart [12].Amine-functionalized group was added on the nanoparticle surfaces using 32 mg of silica nanoparticles washed with deionized water (2 times) and 1 mM acetic acid (once). The particles were dispersed with ultrasonication and reacted with 20 mL of 10% (3-aminopropyl) trimethoxysilyl propyldiethylenetriamine in 1 mM acetic acid (APTS) for 30 min at room temperature (25°C) with continuous stirring. The particles were stored in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.3) at 4°C.The amine-functionalized nanoparticles were then thoroughly washed three times by deionized water and washed withN,N-dimethylformamide and further reacted with 10% succinic anhydride in N,N-dimethylformamide solution under nitrogen gas for 6 h with continuous stirring. The particles were analyzed to verify the attachment of the functional groups on the surface using Fourier Transformed mid Infrared Spectrophotometer (range of 4500–450 cm−1 resolution 4.0 cm−1, No of Scan 16) (FTIR, Perkin Elmer Model Spectrum One, USA) and FT-Raman (750 mW, Res 4.0 cm−1, no of scan 1000; Bruker IFS 66 v/s, USA).


## 2.5. Immobilization of Antibodies on Nanoparticle Surface

An aliquot of 5 mL of 0.1 mg/mL nanoparticles was reacted with 2 mL of 5μg protein/mL of the antibody for 2–4 h at room temperature with continuous stirring, followed by washing with 0.1 M PBS buffer pH 7.3. The antibody-conjugated nanoparticles surface was blocked with 1% BSA and washed in 0.1 M PBS before use.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Preparation and Characterization of Silica Nanoparticles

The W/O microemulsion and sol-gel techniques were used for the preparation of nanoparticles. Sizes were collected from 30 particles from TEM image (Jeol Model JEM-1230, USA) to evaluate mean and standard deviation of the particles using Program Origin 7 (USA, 1991–2002). It was found that the distribution of diameter of particles was in the range of 38 nm to 47 nm with the average and standard deviation of43±4 nm. The particles were round in shape with narrow size distribution and well dispersed as shown in Figure 1.Figure 1
Transmission electron microscope images of FDS-NPs at 100,000x magnification.The particles of with diameter of 42 nm and 44 nm were 40% and 46%, respectively. They were accounted for 86% of total particles. Particles of size 38 and 47 nm diameter contained only 14% (Figure2).Figure 2
Size distribution of FDS-NPs produced by the sol-gel microemulsion method.The aqueous dye molecules were trapped inside a silica matrix to form the fluorescent dye-doped silica nanoparticles. Spectrofluorometric measurements of the excitation and the emission spectra of the nanoparticles were carried out in the aqueous solution. They exhibited maximum emission at 608 nm when excited at the 547 nm (Figure3). The excitation spectra were the same for the Rubpy dye and nanoparticles, but the maximum emission band of the Rubpy dye shifted by 7 and 8 nm, respectively, to the longer wavelength compared with the nanoparticles luminescence.Excitation ((a); 547 nm) and emission ((b); 608 nm) wavelengths of the dye-doped silica nanoparticles.
(a)(b)Photobleaching of Rubpy dye, fluorescent dye-doped silica nanoparticles and surface-modified nanoparticles, were studied under a long period of continuous intensive exposure (60 min) to a 150 watt xenon lamp light. The results showed that free Rubpy dye had photobleaching of about 40% after 60 min, while those of the particles (particles with and without additional functional groups) were much more stable (Figure4). It was clearly indicated that silica coating of the nanoparticles was able to minimize photobleaching of the luminescence dyes. Silica coating appeared to completely prevent outside oxygen molecule from penetration and reaction with inside dye molecules which cause photobleaching [13].Figure 4
Fluorescent intensity of Rubpy dye, dye-doped nanoparticles, and surface-modified nanoparticles exposure to 150 W Xenon lamp excitation.


### 3.2. Surface Modification of FDS-NPs

Figures5–7 displayed FTIR and FT-Raman spectra of FDS-NPs. It was found that C=O stretch (Carboxyl group) and N–H (amine stretch) did not clearly shown in FTIR spectra (Figure 5). The existence of amino and carboxyl groups was evident in FT-Raman spectra in Figures 6 and 7, respectively. The FT-Raman spectrum showed hydroxyl group (O–H) at 1,150–1,170 Raman shift cm−1, silica (Si–O–Si) at 650 Raman shift cm−1, carboxyl (C=O) at 1,550–1,660 Raman shift cm−1. The other carboxyl group in carboxyl functionalized nanoparticles was also indicated at 1,653.14 cm−1. The findings confirmed the success modifications of FDS-NPs surfaces. The functional group that was for the antibodies to attach onto is surface.Figure 5
FTIR spectrum of FDS-NPs with amine modification.Figure 6
FT-Raman spectrum of FDS-NPs with amine modifications.Figure 7
FT-Raman spectrum of FDS-NPs with carboxyl modification.The carboxyl group could be seen at the peak at 1,653.14 cm−1 under FTIR spectrum. The attachment of C. jejuni monoclonal antibodies on the modified surface FDS-NPs was a success and the particles could react with the target C. jejuni as designed (Figure 8).Figure 8
Effects of NaCl concentrations on zeta potential (mV) of the silica nanoparticles.


### 3.3. Reduction of the Aggregation of Silica Nanoparticles

However, after amine modification, the surface of FDS-NPS became positively charged [14]. The phenomena caused agglutination of the particles. The positive charge on surface of the particle was not consistent and attracted the negative-charged particles resulted in aggregation of the particles after surface modification. TEM images of amine- and carboxyl-modified nanoparticles indicated that some particles were aggregated.After amine modification, FDS-NPS were dispersed with sonication probe. The particles then went through carboxyl modification with succinic anhydride. The process modified the surfaces of particles to negative charge and hence reduced the agglomeration of the particles. Succinic anhydride produced negative charges and caused repulsion among the particles.Effects of sodium chloride at various concentrations on aggregation of antibody-conjugated FDS-NPS were shown in Figure8. NaCl at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 mM in PBS buffer caused the zeta potentials to decrease from −6 to −40 mV. Results from Nanosizer analysis, a light scattering detector for the prediction of dispersion stability, showed the zeta-potential of between −30 to 30 mV indicating that the suspension was not stable. The values outside −30 to 30 mV indicated stable condition which means the particles dispersed evenly and did not form aggregates.In this study, the concentrations of NaCl from 10 mM to 25 mM gave zeta-potential value of less than −30 mV. The NaCl concentration at 10 mM that gave the values lower than −30 resulted in less aggregation allowing antibodies coated on the surface to function properly. Higher concentration could affect the activities of the antibodies [15].Figure9 demonstrated that C. jejuni surrounded with antibody-conjugated FDS-NPs giving the bright color appearance under epifluorescence microscope (40x). The sample was placed in a Petroff-Hausser counting chamber (0.05×0.05×0.2 mm).Figure 9
Antibody-conjugated FDS-NPs attached toC. jejuni cell surface in Petroff-Hausser counting chamber under epifluorescent microscope (40x).The depth of chamber appeared to have different focus lengths of small particles and larger cells coated with a large number of FDS-NPs. Cells surrounded with the FDS-NPs were detected with a shorter focusing length while those unattached were smaller and sank to bottom hence required longer distance to be focused. With this technique, theC. jejuni cells were distinctively bright orange color while the background was clearly seen as sediments of unattached dispersed particles and small aggregates compared with coated cells.


## 3.1. Preparation and Characterization of Silica Nanoparticles

The W/O microemulsion and sol-gel techniques were used for the preparation of nanoparticles. Sizes were collected from 30 particles from TEM image (Jeol Model JEM-1230, USA) to evaluate mean and standard deviation of the particles using Program Origin 7 (USA, 1991–2002). It was found that the distribution of diameter of particles was in the range of 38 nm to 47 nm with the average and standard deviation of43±4 nm. The particles were round in shape with narrow size distribution and well dispersed as shown in Figure 1.Figure 1
Transmission electron microscope images of FDS-NPs at 100,000x magnification.The particles of with diameter of 42 nm and 44 nm were 40% and 46%, respectively. They were accounted for 86% of total particles. Particles of size 38 and 47 nm diameter contained only 14% (Figure2).Figure 2
Size distribution of FDS-NPs produced by the sol-gel microemulsion method.The aqueous dye molecules were trapped inside a silica matrix to form the fluorescent dye-doped silica nanoparticles. Spectrofluorometric measurements of the excitation and the emission spectra of the nanoparticles were carried out in the aqueous solution. They exhibited maximum emission at 608 nm when excited at the 547 nm (Figure3). The excitation spectra were the same for the Rubpy dye and nanoparticles, but the maximum emission band of the Rubpy dye shifted by 7 and 8 nm, respectively, to the longer wavelength compared with the nanoparticles luminescence.Excitation ((a); 547 nm) and emission ((b); 608 nm) wavelengths of the dye-doped silica nanoparticles.
(a)(b)Photobleaching of Rubpy dye, fluorescent dye-doped silica nanoparticles and surface-modified nanoparticles, were studied under a long period of continuous intensive exposure (60 min) to a 150 watt xenon lamp light. The results showed that free Rubpy dye had photobleaching of about 40% after 60 min, while those of the particles (particles with and without additional functional groups) were much more stable (Figure4). It was clearly indicated that silica coating of the nanoparticles was able to minimize photobleaching of the luminescence dyes. Silica coating appeared to completely prevent outside oxygen molecule from penetration and reaction with inside dye molecules which cause photobleaching [13].Figure 4
Fluorescent intensity of Rubpy dye, dye-doped nanoparticles, and surface-modified nanoparticles exposure to 150 W Xenon lamp excitation.


## 3.2. Surface Modification of FDS-NPs

Figures5–7 displayed FTIR and FT-Raman spectra of FDS-NPs. It was found that C=O stretch (Carboxyl group) and N–H (amine stretch) did not clearly shown in FTIR spectra (Figure 5). The existence of amino and carboxyl groups was evident in FT-Raman spectra in Figures 6 and 7, respectively. The FT-Raman spectrum showed hydroxyl group (O–H) at 1,150–1,170 Raman shift cm−1, silica (Si–O–Si) at 650 Raman shift cm−1, carboxyl (C=O) at 1,550–1,660 Raman shift cm−1. The other carboxyl group in carboxyl functionalized nanoparticles was also indicated at 1,653.14 cm−1. The findings confirmed the success modifications of FDS-NPs surfaces. The functional group that was for the antibodies to attach onto is surface.Figure 5
FTIR spectrum of FDS-NPs with amine modification.Figure 6
FT-Raman spectrum of FDS-NPs with amine modifications.Figure 7
FT-Raman spectrum of FDS-NPs with carboxyl modification.The carboxyl group could be seen at the peak at 1,653.14 cm−1 under FTIR spectrum. The attachment of C. jejuni monoclonal antibodies on the modified surface FDS-NPs was a success and the particles could react with the target C. jejuni as designed (Figure 8).Figure 8
Effects of NaCl concentrations on zeta potential (mV) of the silica nanoparticles.


## 3.3. Reduction of the Aggregation of Silica Nanoparticles

However, after amine modification, the surface of FDS-NPS became positively charged [14]. The phenomena caused agglutination of the particles. The positive charge on surface of the particle was not consistent and attracted the negative-charged particles resulted in aggregation of the particles after surface modification. TEM images of amine- and carboxyl-modified nanoparticles indicated that some particles were aggregated.After amine modification, FDS-NPS were dispersed with sonication probe. The particles then went through carboxyl modification with succinic anhydride. The process modified the surfaces of particles to negative charge and hence reduced the agglomeration of the particles. Succinic anhydride produced negative charges and caused repulsion among the particles.Effects of sodium chloride at various concentrations on aggregation of antibody-conjugated FDS-NPS were shown in Figure8. NaCl at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 mM in PBS buffer caused the zeta potentials to decrease from −6 to −40 mV. Results from Nanosizer analysis, a light scattering detector for the prediction of dispersion stability, showed the zeta-potential of between −30 to 30 mV indicating that the suspension was not stable. The values outside −30 to 30 mV indicated stable condition which means the particles dispersed evenly and did not form aggregates.In this study, the concentrations of NaCl from 10 mM to 25 mM gave zeta-potential value of less than −30 mV. The NaCl concentration at 10 mM that gave the values lower than −30 resulted in less aggregation allowing antibodies coated on the surface to function properly. Higher concentration could affect the activities of the antibodies [15].Figure9 demonstrated that C. jejuni surrounded with antibody-conjugated FDS-NPs giving the bright color appearance under epifluorescence microscope (40x). The sample was placed in a Petroff-Hausser counting chamber (0.05×0.05×0.2 mm).Figure 9
Antibody-conjugated FDS-NPs attached toC. jejuni cell surface in Petroff-Hausser counting chamber under epifluorescent microscope (40x).The depth of chamber appeared to have different focus lengths of small particles and larger cells coated with a large number of FDS-NPs. Cells surrounded with the FDS-NPs were detected with a shorter focusing length while those unattached were smaller and sank to bottom hence required longer distance to be focused. With this technique, theC. jejuni cells were distinctively bright orange color while the background was clearly seen as sediments of unattached dispersed particles and small aggregates compared with coated cells.


## 4. Conclusion

A water-in-oil microemulsion in cooperation with sol-gel techniques and surface modification method was used to prepare uniform size of fluorescent dye-doped silica nanoparticles. The application of sodium chloride could reduce aggregates of the antibody conjugated silica nanoparticles. In this contribution, a homogenous noncompetitive immunoassay has been developed based on the aggregation of antibody-functionalized silica nanoparticles that could be observed under epifluorescent microscope. Using Petroff-Hausser counting chamber successfully separated cells attached with nanoparticles from the unattached particles.



---

*Source: 865186-2012-04-10.xml*