# A Novel Design of Microstrip Arrays for Relay-Based Wireless Network

Authors: Ioannis Petropoulos; Konstantinos Voudouris; Raed A. Abd-Alhameed; Steve M. R. Jones; Nikos Athanasopoulos
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2011)

---

## Abstract

A relay station (RS) is a smart transceiver used under a 4G wireless network in order to extend network's coverage and capacity. It uses an antenna system that includes an antenna for connecting the relay with the end users (access link) and the RS with the base station (backhaul link).  In this paper, a 7.9 dBi access and 11.4 dBi backhaul antennas are presented for the frequency range of 3.3 to 3.8 GHz. The antennas are simulated and fabricated, and relevant measured results in terms of return loss and radiation pattern are presented and analyzed. Considering that the planes of those two antennas are positioned in an angleω (omega), two antenna configuration geometries are tested in terms of coupling. The experimental results of S21 for several values of the angle ω show that the interaction between the radiating elements is dependent on their relative position. Simulated and experimental results are in good agreement, showing coupling typically less than −40 dB. A comparison in terms of coupling between the proposed antennas and commercial ones proves that the suggested antennas provide 10 dB lower coupling.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Relay stations (RSs) are network element devices, designed to fill holes in the base station (BS) coverage. They receive, enhance, and then retransmit the signal after digital processing [1]. The antenna system is critical to the operation of the relay station (RS). It aims to connect RS with BS realizing the backhaul connection and RS with user subscribers, realizing the access link. Relays can be used in many wireless networks. The present study refers to a WiMAX wireless network in the range of 3.3 to 3.8 GHz.Figure1 summarizes the operation of an antenna system showing that relay station can be an intermediate link between base station and end user. Such a topology can ensure high quality of data transmission using an antenna system that can efficiently receive and transmit information.Figure 1
Relay station operation.Many antennas have been proposed for use in the WiMAX frequency range, such as U and C slot antennas [2, 3], U-shaped patches [4], and PIFA [5]. Another important issue associated with the antenna is coupling. Coupling is a phenomenon that expresses the level of interaction between radiation elements. It is necessary to maintain coupling as low as possible to prevent distortion of the transmitted signal. Several studies have been carried out, investigating methods to predict and evaluate mutual coupling [6–9]. Also special attention has been given to mutual coupling reduction, by placing resonators between radiating elements [10] or by using planar EBG structures [11, 12].In this paper, two simple, low-cost planar antennas, based on microstrip technology, one for the access link and one for backhaul link, are designed and presented. These antennas are compared to commercial ones, and their features are outlined. The two proposed antennas are positioned together and are examined in terms of coupling. Experimental and simulated results ofS21 are presented and compared. A clear relation between coupling and the angle between the access and backhaul antenna is found. Finally, a coupling comparison between the suggested and commercial antennas is performed, and corresponded results are depicted.


## 2. Access Antenna

An access antenna was simulated and fabricated, and the relevant results are depicted below. Four patches (radiating elements) fed by microstrip lines are placed on FR4 substrate (εr=4.4, h=1.6 mm). The excitation is realized by a coaxial cable which is connected to microstrip line. The simulated antenna is depicted in Figure 2(a), while the fabricated one can be seen in Figure 2(b). Access antenna’s dimensions are 12.5 cm × 10 cm. Simulations have been performed using Ansoft HFSS v.12. Measurements of return loss (S11) and radiation pattern have been taken in an anechoic chamber.Antenna geometry and measurements; (a) antenna model, (b) antenna prototype.
(a)(b)TheS11 parameter as a function of frequency is depicted. Figure 3 depicts the simulated and measured curves of S11 as a function of frequency, for the access antenna. Curves are in good agreement, showing resonance at 3.5 GHz.Figure 3
S11 parameter for simulated and fabricated antenna.For the experimental estimation ofS11, a Vector Network Analyzer was used (Anritsu VNA MS2036A). Before measurements, calibration was performed in order to take into consideration the cable losses and increase the level of experiment accuracy. The excitation of access and backhaul antennas is realized by a coaxial cable which feeds the microstrip line. In the connecting point between cable and microstrip line, losses are introduced that reduce the amount of power that enters the antenna. That is why this antenna presents narrow bandwidth [13].Access antenna presentsS11=-14.23 dB for 3.5 GHz. The impedance bandwidth of the antenna is estimated to be 31.8 MHz (S11<-10 dB [14]). The radiation pattern of the simulated and fabricated antenna is illustrated in Figure 4(a) for yz plane at 3.5 GHz. Half-power beamwidth (HPBW) is 35.96°. The antenna presents gain G=7.94 dBi in the direction of maximum emission. Let us mention here that FR4 substrate has an increased loss tangent (tanδ=0.02) which means low-quality factor and thus increased dielectric losses. That is why the antenna gain appeared to be less than what is expected but high enough to support the access link.(a) Radiation pattern of access antenna in yz plane for 3.5 GHz. (b) Radiation pattern of access antenna in xz plane for 3.5 GHz.
(a)(b)The radiation pattern in xz plane is depicted in Figure4(b), presenting HPBW = 51.07°.Figures4(a) and 4(b) also depict the simulated cross polarization level of the access antenna. Cross polarization expresses the amount of power-emitted orthogonal to the desired direction, and it has to be as low as possible. Surface waves are dependent of the substrate and give rise to cross polarization. For minimizing these waves, materials with low dielectric losses could be chosen.


## 3. Backhaul Antenna

An antenna array intended to be used for connecting the relay with the base station is presented in this section. The simulated and constructed antenna can be seen in Figures5(a) and 5(b), respectively. Backhaul antenna’s dimensions are 25.5 cm × 21.5 cm.Backhaul antenna geometry and measurements. (a) Backhaul antenna model, (b) backhaul antenna prototype.
(a)(b)TheS11 parameter for the simulated and fabricated antenna is shown below (Figure 6) where a slight difference is attributed to the imprecise process of construction.Figure 6
S11 parameter for backhaul antenna.Backhaul antenna presentsS11=-20.46 dB at 3.5 GHz, and impedance bandwidth is equal to 83.9 MHz. A second resonance frequency appeared at 3.9 GHz where S11=-14.17 dB. The gain of the backhaul antenna has been found to be 11.4 dBi for 3.5 GHz. Gain could be greater if a substrate of lower dielectric losses was used.The radiation pattern is presented in Figure7(a) where a narrow beam is noticed due to the increase in the number of radiation elements compared to the case of the access antenna. HPBW has been measured 18.2°.(a) Radiation pattern of backhaul antenna in yz plane for 3.5 GHz. (b) Radiation pattern of backhaul antenna in xz plane for 3.5 GHz.
(a)(b)The radiation pattern in xz plane is presented in Figure7(b). In this case, HPBW = 25.45°.Figures7(a) and 7(b) also represent the cross polarization level which appeared to be increased due to the FR4 substrate.Measured access and backhaul antenna characteristics are denoted in Table1.Table 1
Access and backhaul antenna features.
S11 (dB) for 3.5 GHzGain (dBi)HPBW (degrees) xz planeHPBW (degrees) yz planeBandwidth (MHz)Access antenna−14.237.951.0735.9631.8Commercial access antenna (1SKF-333808W)−15.08868—500Backhaul antenna−20.4611.425.4518.2083.9Commercial backhaul antenna (TSWL315177)−18.481817—400Gain and bandwidth are increased in the case of the backhaul antenna due to the larger number of radiation elements (16 elements) compared to the access antenna (4 elements). Also half-power beamwidth (HPBW) is decreased in the backhaul antenna. In addition, a comparison is performed between the proposed antennas and relevant commercial ones. Regarding access antenna, model 1SKF-333808W is a panel antenna presenting HPBW = 68°, gain 8 dBi, and bandwidth 500 MHz. The proposed access antenna gives similar gain but less HPBW and bandwidth due to FR4 substrate. Bandwidth could be enlarged by using a substrate of lower loss tangent such as Rogers RO 3006 (εr=6.15, tanδ=0.0025) or Rogers RT Duroid 5880 (εr=2.2, tanδ=0.0009). Wider bandwidth could also occur using stacked geometry including two or more substrates separated by air gaps. FR4 substrate was chosen because of its low cost and ease of fabrication. Regarding backhaul antenna, the commercial one presents enhanced bandwidth and gain. The proposed backhaul antenna uses low-cost FR4 substrate which has high loss tangent that leads to limited gain, bandwidth, and high sidelobes. The design of access and backhaul antenna has been made maintaining low cost of fabrication and low complexity level. Both antennas can be improved in terms of gain and bandwidth by using stacked geometries and dielectrics of low losses.Both access and backhaul antennas operate at the same frequency and provide a limited radio bandwidth. This is not a drawback if we take into consideration that the relay station provides high spectral efficiency. Since both proposed antennas have the same resonant frequency and the relay station performs in the simultaneously transmit-receive (STR) mode, it is necessary to examine the coupling phenomenon between the antennas.


## 4. Coupling Effects Study

Two cases of configuration between the proposed antennas are examined. These configurations are shown in the figures that follow. Coupling between the two antennas in terms ofS21 is measured using Anritsu VNA MS2036A, and results are depicted. The tested setup is depicted in Figure 8 where two similar configurations are shown.Antenna arrangements under test; (a) configuration 1, (b) configuration 2.
(a)(b)Coupling measurements have been taken in anechoic chamber to achieve precision and validity of results. Figures9(a) and 9(b) show the experimental setup. The distance between two adjacent radiation elements of access and backhaul antennas is 0.52 λo. This distance is adequate for low mutual coupling [15] and maintaining the total size of the antenna system as small as possible.Access and backhaul antenna setup during coupling measurements.
(a)(b)Study of configurations 1 and 2 due to the relative position of antennas can be considered as coupling investigation in E-plane and H-plane, respectively.


### 4.1. Configuration 1

In the first case (configuration 1), the two antennas are put in such a way so that the angle between them isω=180° and then ω increases with a step of 10° and finally reaches 270°. The scheme that specifies the proposed setup can be seen in Figure 10.Figure 10
The investigated setup.Together with the experimental measurements, simulations ofS21 as a function of the angle ω have been carried out. Simulation and measurement of S21 for the case of ω=180° is depicted in Figure 11(b).(a) Simulation of access and backhaul antennas system for configuration 1 (ω=180°). (b) Simulation and experiment S21 for ω=180°.
(a)(b)Figure11(b) shows that simulation and experimental curve of S21 is located below −40 dB for the frequency range of 3.4 to 3.6 GHz.Forω=190°, the experimental setup is depicted in Figure 12(a) and the corresponded results in Figure 12(b).(a) Configuration forω=190°. (b) S21 for ω=190°.
(a)(b)Forω=200°, the experimental setup is depicted in Figure 13(a) and the corresponded results in Figure 13(b).(a) Configuration forω=200°. (b) S21 for ω=200°.
(a)(b)The experiment continues forω=210° till 270° with a step of 10°. Coupling can change the operation frequency of an antenna and distort the radiation pattern; that is why it is necessary to maintain coupling at a low level. Coupling effect is mainly caused by space waves that end up from one antenna to another (Figure 14). It is also dependent on surface waves that travel through dielectric [15]. From the analysis performed for configuration 1, it is derived that increasing the angle ω seems to reduce the density of field lines that end up from one antenna to the other thus reducing coupling effect.Figure 14
Field lines that cause coupling effect.


### 4.2. Configuration 2

In this case, the access and backhaul antennas are positioned as shown in Figure15.Figure 15
The investigated setup.Together with the experimental measurements, simulations ofS21 against angle ω for configuration 2 have been performed. The case of ω=180° is depicted in Figure 16(b).(a) Simulation of access and backhaul antennas for configuration 2 (ω=180°). (b)Simulation and experiment S21 for ω=180°.
(a)(b)Figure16(b) represents the simulation and experimental curve for S21. Coupling is at an acceptable level (<−40 dB) for the frequency range 3.4 to 3.6 GHz.Forω=190°, the corresponded results can be seen in Figure 17(b).(a) Configuration forω=190°. (b) S21 for ω=190°.
(a)(b)Forω=200°, the experimental setup is depicted in Figure 18(a) and the corresponded results in Figure 18(b).(a) Configuration forω=200°. (b) S21 for ω=200°.
(a)(b)The experiment continues forω=210° up to 270° with a step of 10°.In configuration 2, the coupling effect is weaker compared to configuration 1 as it producesS21 that varies from −48 dB to −68 dB.


## 4.1. Configuration 1

In the first case (configuration 1), the two antennas are put in such a way so that the angle between them isω=180° and then ω increases with a step of 10° and finally reaches 270°. The scheme that specifies the proposed setup can be seen in Figure 10.Figure 10
The investigated setup.Together with the experimental measurements, simulations ofS21 as a function of the angle ω have been carried out. Simulation and measurement of S21 for the case of ω=180° is depicted in Figure 11(b).(a) Simulation of access and backhaul antennas system for configuration 1 (ω=180°). (b) Simulation and experiment S21 for ω=180°.
(a)(b)Figure11(b) shows that simulation and experimental curve of S21 is located below −40 dB for the frequency range of 3.4 to 3.6 GHz.Forω=190°, the experimental setup is depicted in Figure 12(a) and the corresponded results in Figure 12(b).(a) Configuration forω=190°. (b) S21 for ω=190°.
(a)(b)Forω=200°, the experimental setup is depicted in Figure 13(a) and the corresponded results in Figure 13(b).(a) Configuration forω=200°. (b) S21 for ω=200°.
(a)(b)The experiment continues forω=210° till 270° with a step of 10°. Coupling can change the operation frequency of an antenna and distort the radiation pattern; that is why it is necessary to maintain coupling at a low level. Coupling effect is mainly caused by space waves that end up from one antenna to another (Figure 14). It is also dependent on surface waves that travel through dielectric [15]. From the analysis performed for configuration 1, it is derived that increasing the angle ω seems to reduce the density of field lines that end up from one antenna to the other thus reducing coupling effect.Figure 14
Field lines that cause coupling effect.


## 4.2. Configuration 2

In this case, the access and backhaul antennas are positioned as shown in Figure15.Figure 15
The investigated setup.Together with the experimental measurements, simulations ofS21 against angle ω for configuration 2 have been performed. The case of ω=180° is depicted in Figure 16(b).(a) Simulation of access and backhaul antennas for configuration 2 (ω=180°). (b)Simulation and experiment S21 for ω=180°.
(a)(b)Figure16(b) represents the simulation and experimental curve for S21. Coupling is at an acceptable level (<−40 dB) for the frequency range 3.4 to 3.6 GHz.Forω=190°, the corresponded results can be seen in Figure 17(b).(a) Configuration forω=190°. (b) S21 for ω=190°.
(a)(b)Forω=200°, the experimental setup is depicted in Figure 18(a) and the corresponded results in Figure 18(b).(a) Configuration forω=200°. (b) S21 for ω=200°.
(a)(b)The experiment continues forω=210° up to 270° with a step of 10°.In configuration 2, the coupling effect is weaker compared to configuration 1 as it producesS21 that varies from −48 dB to −68 dB.


## 5. Results

In the tables that follow, the maximum value of experimentalS21 is denoted in the frequency range of 3.4 GHz to 3.6 GHz, for each value of angle ω.In Table2, the maximum values of S21 in terms of angle ω for the configuration 1 are denoted. The frequency range of interest is 3.2 to 3.8 GHz.Table 2
S21 variation for configuration 1.
Configuration 1ω (degrees)S21 max (dB)180−47.67190−46.84200−49.15210−50.46220−50.3230−50.56240−50.83250−54.94260−54.92270−53.94The maximum value ofS21 as a function of the angle ω is depicted in Figure 19.Figure 19
S21 as a function of angle ω for configuration 1.Table3 follows together with the corresponded S21 diagram. In Table 3, the maximum values of S21 in terms of angle ω for the configuration 2 are denoted. The frequency range of interest is 3.2 to 3.8 GHz.Table 3
S21 variation for configuration 2.
Configuration 2ω (degrees)S21 max (dB)180−55.56190−54.7200−57.34210−61.01220−60.26230−58.36240−59.1250−63.02260−65.35270−60.68The maximum value ofS21 as a function of the angle ω is depicted in Figure 20.Figure 20
S21 as a function of angle ω for configuration 2.Both configurations 1 and 2 provide a low level of coupling (S21<-40 dB). Coupling appears to decrease nonlinearly while ω increases. Configuration 2 is more acceptable because S21 takes values lower than −50 dB for all angles of ω. The simulated coupling results provide some confidence that the levels will remain low between the angles at which measurements were performed.A comparison in terms of coupling between the proposed antennas and the commercial ones presented in Table1 has also been performed. Both commercial and proposed antennas have been measured in terms of coupling for ω=270°. The Relay set up including the suggested access and backhaul antenna can be seen in Figure 21.Figure 21
Relay station with the proposed antennas.Figure22 shows coupling variations for commercial antennas and the proposed ones for configurations 1 and 2 at ω=270°.Figure 22
Coupling comparison.It is clear that both proposed configurations give lower values ofS21 compared to the commercial antennas proving the efficiency and competence of the suggested setup.


## 6. Conclusions

This paper describes the design, simulation, and testing of two microstrip antennas (access and backhaul). Antenna characteristics in terms of gain, bandwidth, and beamwidth (HPBW) in xz and yz plane are approximately 8 dBi, 32 MHz, 51°, and 36° for the access antenna and 11.4 dBi, 84 MHz, 25.5°, and 18° for the backhaul antenna.S11 parameters and radiation pattern in xz and yz plane level for simulated and fabricated antennas were presented. The comparison between measured and simulated results shows good agreement. Access and backhaul antennas were then alongside or above one another, and their interaction is investigated. Two configurations are presented for which measured and simulated S21 are given. Coupling (S21) is investigated against the angle between the antenna planes for the two configurations. Maximum values of S21 against ω were presented for the frequency range of 3.4 to 3.6 GHz in which the antennas operate. Coupling is typically below −40 dB. Diagrams of S21 against ω show that coupling increases with increasing angle. Measurements and simulations show that the presented antennas could be used in both configurations under a relay-based network as they present an acceptably low level of interaction for all values of ω. The comparison between the proposed patch antennas and the commercial ones prove that the suggested antennas provide 10 dB lower coupling providing low interaction and high isolation.



---

*Source: 870183-2011-09-15.xml*