# Development and Adsorption Characterization of Metal Affinity-Immobilized Magnetic Liposome

Authors: Yuan Lu; Dankui Liao; Xuezhen Feng; Hualin Meng; Yuting Lu; Qiqiu Wei; Siliang Duan; Shanguang Wu
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

A metal affinity-immobilized magnetic liposome (MA-IML) was prepared in this research, which was with lipid and Ni2+ content of 143.25 μg/mg and 32 μmol/mg, respectively. The antihypertensive peptides Ile-Pro-Pro (IPP) and Val-Pro-Pro (VPP) could be adsorbed onto MA-IML under specific conditions, and the adsorption kinetics was explored. The pseudo-second-order kinetics (R2value>0.98) was more suitable to describe the adsorption process of IPP and VPP than the intraparticle diffusion model and pseudo-first-order kinetic model. The results indicated that MA-IML could be used as an adsorbent for screening antihypertensive peptides from natural products.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Hypertension is one of the main life-threatening diseases in the world. In the presence of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), angiotensin I (Ang I) can be converted to angiotensin II (Ang II). Ang II leads to vasoconstriction and elevation of blood pressure and degrades bradykinin which has antihypertensive effect. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) can lower blood pressure by inhibiting the ACE activity and reducing the production of Ang II. At present, synthetic ACE inhibitors are widely used as antihypertensive drugs in clinical practice. But they have serious side effects such as cough and angioneurotic edema [1, 2]. Therefore, recent research has focused on the development of ACE inhibitors that come from natural products and have low side effects. Over 200 ACE inhibitory peptides, called antihypertensive peptides, have been found from different kinds of food protein hydrolysates [3]. Among them, the antihypertensive peptides Ile-Pro-Pro (IPP) and Val-Pro-Pro (VPP) were proved in a single-blind, placebo-controlled study [4] and used as food additive in drinks. Antihypertensive effect of valyl-tyrosine derived from sardine muscle hydrolyzate was confirmed on mild hypertensive subjects [5]. Much of research has showed antihypertensive peptides with different structures can be obtained by enzymolysis and fermentation. The majority of ACEI are relatively short sequences containing 2 to 12 amino acids. Structure activity studies indicated that ACEI containing hydrophobic amino acid residues at each C-terminal position may have high ACE inhibitory activity [3]. There is a positive correlation between the hydrophobicity of the ultimate C-terminal amino acid and the ACE inhibitory activity of ACEI [6].It is difficult to isolate and enrich ACEI, because protein hydrolysates are mixtures of many components. At present, most of ACEI are usually purified using several chromatographic steps including size exclusion, ionic exchange, and RP-HPLC chromatography. Those methods are time-consuming and inefficient. Affinity chromatography is a powerful separation technique for proteins and peptides, and some of them have been reported in purification of ACEI in recent years [7–10]. In 2014, a new chromatographic technique, the metal affinity-immobilized liposome chromatography (MA-ILC), was developed by Nagami et al. [11], which may have the characteristics of both the immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) and the immobilized liposome chromatography (ILC). IMAC is a separation technique that uses the affinity differences between peptides and metal ions [12–14], and immobilized liposomes are known to interact with proteins or peptides via hydrophobic interaction. So the MA-ILC has the metal affinity and the hydrophobic adsorption, which may be a powerful separation technique for ACEI, because of hydrophobic properties of ACEI. However, the pretreatment and operation of MA-ILC is complex.By combining magnetic separation technique and MA-ILC, we develop a new magnetic adsorbent, metal affinity-immobilized magnetic liposome (MA-IML), in this study. It may have the characteristics of MA-ILC and may be easy to operate and facilitate the batch recovery of the adsorbent with the aid of a magnet simply. To obtain MA-IML, the magnetic liposomes containing N-hexadecyl iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) will be firstly prepared and then coupled with metal ions (Ni2+). Furthermore, the adsorption kinetics of MA-IML with antihypertensive peptides IPP and VPP will be studied.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Reagents and Chemicals

IPP and VPP were purchased from GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. Hexadecylamine and ethyl bromoacetate were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. Lipid was purchased from Shanghai Tywei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Methanol and acetonitrile were of HPLC grade and purchased from Thermo Fisher (NJ, USA). The other chemicals were of analytical reagent grade.


### 2.2. Synthesis Process of HIDA

HIDA was synthesized according to reference with a slight modification [15]. In brief, hexadecylamine and ethyl bromoacetate were added into a 250 mL flask, in which the mass ratio of hexadecylamine and ethyl bromoacetate was 2-3. Under magnetic stirring, 10.36 g of potassium carbonate, 2.49 g of potassium iodide, and 50 mL of dimethylformamide were added into the mixture and refluxed at 90°C for 12 h. After that, the reaction solution was cooled to room temperature, diluted by 120 mL deionized water, and extracted by ethyl acetate. The organic phase was concentrated in vacuo, and 200 mL of 0.5 mol/L NaOH solutions was added to dissolve the residue. The homogeneous solution was refluxed at 90°C for 2 h, cooled to room temperature, and acidified by 6 mol/L HCl to pH 1. After filtration, the crude HIDA products were obtained and then recrystallized with ethanol.The identification of products was carried out by MS and1H-NMR, using a 106B Ultra-High-Resolution Liquid Mass Spectrometry System (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and a Bruker 300 MHz NMR spectrometer, respectively.


### 2.3. Preparation and Characterization of MA-IML

#### 2.3.1. Preparation of MA-IML

Magnetic nanoparticles (MN) were prepared according to the following protocol. Briefly, FeCl3·6H2O and FeCl2·4H2O were dissolved in 50 mL water at the concentration of 0.077 mol/L ions firstly (the molar ratio of FeCl3·6H2O to FeCl2·4H2O was 1.88). The chemical precipitation was achieved by adding 5.5 mL of 25% NH3·H2O into the above solution at 30°C under nitrogen atmosphere and continuous stirring (800 r·min-1) for 30 min; then, the reaction temperature was raised to 80°C. After incubation for 30 min at 80°C, the MN were precipitated with permanent magnet at room temperature and rinsed with distilled water for six times to remove unreacted chemicals.Magnetic liposomes (ML) containing HIDA were prepared as follows. (I) The required amount of lipid (typically around 20 mg/mL) and HIDA was (the mass ratio of lipid/HIDA was 2) dissolved in 100 mL of ethanol and then transferred to a round bottom flask. The organic phase was subsequently removed using a rotary evaporator at 40°C, and then, a thin film was deposited on the inside wall of the round bottom flask. (II) The MN were dispersed in 50 mL of water and then added into the lipid film with ultrasound for 10 min. The ML were precipitated with permanent magnet and rinsed with distilled water to remove the liposomes without magnetism.Finally, MA-IML was prepared by mixing the ML and 20 mL nickel sulfate solution (0.05 mol/mL) and incubation for 60 min at 37°C. The excess of Ni2+ was removed by washing the adsorbents with distilled water. According to the previous report [16], Ni2+ content of MA-IML was determined by a UV-1900 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, China) at 662 nm, using a standard curve C=0.0872A+0.0009.


#### 2.3.2. Determination of Lipid Content of MA-IML

Lipid content of MA-IML was measured according to Reference [17]. Firstly, 4 mL trichloromethane was added into 0.01 g MA-IML, in order to destroy the structure of magnetic liposomes. Then, 2 mL ammonium ferrothiocyanate was mixed well with it. The mixture was shaken well and centrifuged at a rate of 3000 r/min using a TDL-80-2B centrifuge, and the supernatant liquid was discarded. After filtration, lipid content of MA-IML was determined by a UV-1900 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, China) at 451 nm, using a standard curve C=0.1013A−0.0047.


#### 2.3.3. Size Determination and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

Size and distribution of MA-IML, which was diluted with distilled water, were determined via the Nano S90 particle size analyzer (Malvern Instruments Ltd.), using a dynamic light scattering method. Transmission electron microscopy analyses were carried out using JEOL JSM-2100F from Prime Japan’s Hitachi. The MA-IML fluid was dropped onto a copper mesh grid and visualized by TEM after negative staining with 1% phosphotungstic acid solution (pH=7.0).


### 2.4. Determination of Antihypertensive Peptides by HPLC

The determination of VPP and IPP was analyzed by HPLC with ZORBAX SB-C18 (4.6mm×150mm, 5 μm; Agilent). The peptide was eluted by a linear gradient method from solvent A (water containing 0.1% TFA) to 100% of solvent B (acetonitrile containing 0.1% TFA) over a period of 30 min at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and was detected at 220 nm. Two linear regression equations for IPP and VPP were, respectively, established as follows: y=767.99x–11289 (R2=0.9948) and y=684.55x–602.66 (R2=0.9864), where y is the peak area and x is the amount of IPP or VPP.


### 2.5. Adsorption Experiment

In a typical experiment, 300 mg of MA-IML particles was mixed with IPP or VPP solutions in 2 mL centrifuge tubes.The effects of operating parameters such as various initial concentrations of IPP or VPP and time on the adsorption process were studied. The initial pH of the test solution was modified by adding the 0.1 mol/L borate buffer solution (BBS, pH value of 8.5).The centrifuge tubes were placed in a rotary shaker and incubated at 37°C with gentle stirring (120 r/min). The solutions were immediately filtered through a 0.22μm membrane filter at different incubating time, and concentration of IPP or VPP in the filtrate was measured. The equilibrium adsorption capacity (q, mg/g) was calculated as follows [18]:
(1)q=C0−C1Vm,where C0 (mg·mL-1) is the initial concentration of IPP or VPP solution, C1 (mg·mL-1) is the concentration of IPP or VPP solution at equilibrium, V (mL) is the volume of solution, and m (g) is the mass of MA-IML particles.Furthermore, several adsorption models were applied to describe the adsorption mechanism between MA-IML and IPP or VPP, such as the intraparticle diffusion model, pseudo-first-order model, and pseudo-second-order model. The equation corresponding to the intraparticle diffusion model (Weber-Morris) is the following [19]:
(2)qt=kpt0.5.The pseudo-first-order kinetic model is given as follows [20]:
(3)lnqe−qt=lnqe−k1t.The pseudo-second-order kinetic model defined the adsorption mechanism. It can be articulated by the subsequent equation [21]:
(4)tqt=1k2qe2+tqe,where qt and qe (mg/g) are the amounts of IPP or VPP adsorbed at time t (min) and at equilibrium, respectively. kp (mg·g-1·min-1/2) is the intraparticle diffusion rate constant, k1 (min-1) is the rate constant of the pseudo-first-order model, and k2 (g·mg-1·min-1) is the rate constant of the pseudo-second-order model.


## 2.1. Reagents and Chemicals

IPP and VPP were purchased from GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. Hexadecylamine and ethyl bromoacetate were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. Lipid was purchased from Shanghai Tywei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Methanol and acetonitrile were of HPLC grade and purchased from Thermo Fisher (NJ, USA). The other chemicals were of analytical reagent grade.


## 2.2. Synthesis Process of HIDA

HIDA was synthesized according to reference with a slight modification [15]. In brief, hexadecylamine and ethyl bromoacetate were added into a 250 mL flask, in which the mass ratio of hexadecylamine and ethyl bromoacetate was 2-3. Under magnetic stirring, 10.36 g of potassium carbonate, 2.49 g of potassium iodide, and 50 mL of dimethylformamide were added into the mixture and refluxed at 90°C for 12 h. After that, the reaction solution was cooled to room temperature, diluted by 120 mL deionized water, and extracted by ethyl acetate. The organic phase was concentrated in vacuo, and 200 mL of 0.5 mol/L NaOH solutions was added to dissolve the residue. The homogeneous solution was refluxed at 90°C for 2 h, cooled to room temperature, and acidified by 6 mol/L HCl to pH 1. After filtration, the crude HIDA products were obtained and then recrystallized with ethanol.The identification of products was carried out by MS and1H-NMR, using a 106B Ultra-High-Resolution Liquid Mass Spectrometry System (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and a Bruker 300 MHz NMR spectrometer, respectively.


## 2.3. Preparation and Characterization of MA-IML

### 2.3.1. Preparation of MA-IML

Magnetic nanoparticles (MN) were prepared according to the following protocol. Briefly, FeCl3·6H2O and FeCl2·4H2O were dissolved in 50 mL water at the concentration of 0.077 mol/L ions firstly (the molar ratio of FeCl3·6H2O to FeCl2·4H2O was 1.88). The chemical precipitation was achieved by adding 5.5 mL of 25% NH3·H2O into the above solution at 30°C under nitrogen atmosphere and continuous stirring (800 r·min-1) for 30 min; then, the reaction temperature was raised to 80°C. After incubation for 30 min at 80°C, the MN were precipitated with permanent magnet at room temperature and rinsed with distilled water for six times to remove unreacted chemicals.Magnetic liposomes (ML) containing HIDA were prepared as follows. (I) The required amount of lipid (typically around 20 mg/mL) and HIDA was (the mass ratio of lipid/HIDA was 2) dissolved in 100 mL of ethanol and then transferred to a round bottom flask. The organic phase was subsequently removed using a rotary evaporator at 40°C, and then, a thin film was deposited on the inside wall of the round bottom flask. (II) The MN were dispersed in 50 mL of water and then added into the lipid film with ultrasound for 10 min. The ML were precipitated with permanent magnet and rinsed with distilled water to remove the liposomes without magnetism.Finally, MA-IML was prepared by mixing the ML and 20 mL nickel sulfate solution (0.05 mol/mL) and incubation for 60 min at 37°C. The excess of Ni2+ was removed by washing the adsorbents with distilled water. According to the previous report [16], Ni2+ content of MA-IML was determined by a UV-1900 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, China) at 662 nm, using a standard curve C=0.0872A+0.0009.


### 2.3.2. Determination of Lipid Content of MA-IML

Lipid content of MA-IML was measured according to Reference [17]. Firstly, 4 mL trichloromethane was added into 0.01 g MA-IML, in order to destroy the structure of magnetic liposomes. Then, 2 mL ammonium ferrothiocyanate was mixed well with it. The mixture was shaken well and centrifuged at a rate of 3000 r/min using a TDL-80-2B centrifuge, and the supernatant liquid was discarded. After filtration, lipid content of MA-IML was determined by a UV-1900 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, China) at 451 nm, using a standard curve C=0.1013A−0.0047.


### 2.3.3. Size Determination and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

Size and distribution of MA-IML, which was diluted with distilled water, were determined via the Nano S90 particle size analyzer (Malvern Instruments Ltd.), using a dynamic light scattering method. Transmission electron microscopy analyses were carried out using JEOL JSM-2100F from Prime Japan’s Hitachi. The MA-IML fluid was dropped onto a copper mesh grid and visualized by TEM after negative staining with 1% phosphotungstic acid solution (pH=7.0).


## 2.3.1. Preparation of MA-IML

Magnetic nanoparticles (MN) were prepared according to the following protocol. Briefly, FeCl3·6H2O and FeCl2·4H2O were dissolved in 50 mL water at the concentration of 0.077 mol/L ions firstly (the molar ratio of FeCl3·6H2O to FeCl2·4H2O was 1.88). The chemical precipitation was achieved by adding 5.5 mL of 25% NH3·H2O into the above solution at 30°C under nitrogen atmosphere and continuous stirring (800 r·min-1) for 30 min; then, the reaction temperature was raised to 80°C. After incubation for 30 min at 80°C, the MN were precipitated with permanent magnet at room temperature and rinsed with distilled water for six times to remove unreacted chemicals.Magnetic liposomes (ML) containing HIDA were prepared as follows. (I) The required amount of lipid (typically around 20 mg/mL) and HIDA was (the mass ratio of lipid/HIDA was 2) dissolved in 100 mL of ethanol and then transferred to a round bottom flask. The organic phase was subsequently removed using a rotary evaporator at 40°C, and then, a thin film was deposited on the inside wall of the round bottom flask. (II) The MN were dispersed in 50 mL of water and then added into the lipid film with ultrasound for 10 min. The ML were precipitated with permanent magnet and rinsed with distilled water to remove the liposomes without magnetism.Finally, MA-IML was prepared by mixing the ML and 20 mL nickel sulfate solution (0.05 mol/mL) and incubation for 60 min at 37°C. The excess of Ni2+ was removed by washing the adsorbents with distilled water. According to the previous report [16], Ni2+ content of MA-IML was determined by a UV-1900 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, China) at 662 nm, using a standard curve C=0.0872A+0.0009.


## 2.3.2. Determination of Lipid Content of MA-IML

Lipid content of MA-IML was measured according to Reference [17]. Firstly, 4 mL trichloromethane was added into 0.01 g MA-IML, in order to destroy the structure of magnetic liposomes. Then, 2 mL ammonium ferrothiocyanate was mixed well with it. The mixture was shaken well and centrifuged at a rate of 3000 r/min using a TDL-80-2B centrifuge, and the supernatant liquid was discarded. After filtration, lipid content of MA-IML was determined by a UV-1900 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, China) at 451 nm, using a standard curve C=0.1013A−0.0047.


## 2.3.3. Size Determination and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

Size and distribution of MA-IML, which was diluted with distilled water, were determined via the Nano S90 particle size analyzer (Malvern Instruments Ltd.), using a dynamic light scattering method. Transmission electron microscopy analyses were carried out using JEOL JSM-2100F from Prime Japan’s Hitachi. The MA-IML fluid was dropped onto a copper mesh grid and visualized by TEM after negative staining with 1% phosphotungstic acid solution (pH=7.0).


## 2.4. Determination of Antihypertensive Peptides by HPLC

The determination of VPP and IPP was analyzed by HPLC with ZORBAX SB-C18 (4.6mm×150mm, 5 μm; Agilent). The peptide was eluted by a linear gradient method from solvent A (water containing 0.1% TFA) to 100% of solvent B (acetonitrile containing 0.1% TFA) over a period of 30 min at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and was detected at 220 nm. Two linear regression equations for IPP and VPP were, respectively, established as follows: y=767.99x–11289 (R2=0.9948) and y=684.55x–602.66 (R2=0.9864), where y is the peak area and x is the amount of IPP or VPP.


## 2.5. Adsorption Experiment

In a typical experiment, 300 mg of MA-IML particles was mixed with IPP or VPP solutions in 2 mL centrifuge tubes.The effects of operating parameters such as various initial concentrations of IPP or VPP and time on the adsorption process were studied. The initial pH of the test solution was modified by adding the 0.1 mol/L borate buffer solution (BBS, pH value of 8.5).The centrifuge tubes were placed in a rotary shaker and incubated at 37°C with gentle stirring (120 r/min). The solutions were immediately filtered through a 0.22μm membrane filter at different incubating time, and concentration of IPP or VPP in the filtrate was measured. The equilibrium adsorption capacity (q, mg/g) was calculated as follows [18]:
(1)q=C0−C1Vm,where C0 (mg·mL-1) is the initial concentration of IPP or VPP solution, C1 (mg·mL-1) is the concentration of IPP or VPP solution at equilibrium, V (mL) is the volume of solution, and m (g) is the mass of MA-IML particles.Furthermore, several adsorption models were applied to describe the adsorption mechanism between MA-IML and IPP or VPP, such as the intraparticle diffusion model, pseudo-first-order model, and pseudo-second-order model. The equation corresponding to the intraparticle diffusion model (Weber-Morris) is the following [19]:
(2)qt=kpt0.5.The pseudo-first-order kinetic model is given as follows [20]:
(3)lnqe−qt=lnqe−k1t.The pseudo-second-order kinetic model defined the adsorption mechanism. It can be articulated by the subsequent equation [21]:
(4)tqt=1k2qe2+tqe,where qt and qe (mg/g) are the amounts of IPP or VPP adsorbed at time t (min) and at equilibrium, respectively. kp (mg·g-1·min-1/2) is the intraparticle diffusion rate constant, k1 (min-1) is the rate constant of the pseudo-first-order model, and k2 (g·mg-1·min-1) is the rate constant of the pseudo-second-order model.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Characterization of HIDA

HIDA has the structure that allows it to be easily incorporated into liposome membranes due to the acyl chain attached to the ligand, iminodiacetic acid (IDA). The metal ion on the ML surface was to be immobilized through the coordination with HIDA [14]. However, HIDA is not currently on sale and was made in our laboratory. HIDA was successfully synthesized, and structure of HIDA was identified by MS and 1H-NMR. The MS spectrum of the synthetic HIDA is shown in Figure 1. The calculated m/z for C20H40O4N [M+] is 358.2799, which is consistent with the m/z for HIDA. Figure 2 shows the results of 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.40 (s, 4H), 2.61 (t, 2H), 1.23 (m, 28H), and 0.85 (t, 3H). The purity of the synthetic HIDA was above 99%.Figure 1
MS spectrum of the synthetic HIDA.Figure 2
1H-NMR spectrum of the synthetic HIDA.


### 3.2. Characterization of MA-IML

The lipid content and Ni2+ content of MA-IML were 143.25 μg/mg and 32 μmol/mg, respectively. The effects of the mass ratio of lipid/HIDA on the lipid and Ni2+ content in MA-IML are shown in Tables 1 and 2. The results in Table 1 showed that the lipid content increased as the mass ratio of lipid/HIDA varied from 1 to 5, while the Ni2+ content decreased as shown in Table 2. The adsorption capability to Ni2+ would be probably affected if the amount of HIDA was little, so the mass ratio of lipid/HIDA was not more than 5. When the mass ratio of lipid/HIDA was 1, the Ni2+ content was the maximum, but the lipid content was too low. Therefore, the mass ratio of lipid/HIDA of 2 was chosen when preparing MA-IML.Table 1
Lipid content of MA-IML according to the mass ratio of lipid/HIDA.
Lipid/HIDA
Lipid content (μg/mg)
1
104.30
2
143.25
3
157.42
4
164.92
5
173.70Table 2
Ni2+ content of MA-IML according to the mass ratio of lipid/HIDA.
Lipid/HIDA
Ni2+ content (μmol/mg)
1
35
2
32
3
11
4
5
5
4After negative staining with phosphotungstic acid solution, the lipid layer of MA-IML particle was observed by TEM (the light circle in Figure3), and the dark sphere in Figure 3 was the inner core consisting of Fe3O4. These particles were near-spherical and had good dispersity. The particle size distribution of MA-IML is shown in Figure 4. The results showed that MA-IML had a particle size distribution of 100-500 nm and an average particle size of about 300 nm.Figure 3
Transmission electron microscope image of MA-IML (×7000).Figure 4
Particle size distribution of MA-IML.


### 3.3. Adsorption Kinetic Study

Adsorption kinetics was usually evaluated to determine the contact time, which is required to reach the maximum adsorption capacity of an adsorbent with the equilibrium stage. Figures5 and 6 show the influences of contact time on the adsorption of IPP and VPP, respectively. The curves showed that the amount of IPP and VPP adsorbed was gradually increased in the first 30 min and the equilibrium adsorption capacity reached maximum at about 45 min. At this time, the adsorption rate was approximately equal to the desorption rate.Figure 5
Adsorption kinetic curves of IPP onto MA-IML.Figure 6
Adsorption kinetic curves of VPP onto MA-IML.Kinetic data were treated with the intraparticle diffusion model, pseudo-first-order model, and pseudo-second-order model, respectively. The fitting kinetic parameters of IPP or VPP absorbed onto MA-IML are shown in Figures7–12 and Tables 3 and 4. By comparing the R2 values of different models, it was found that the pseudo-second-order kinetics (R2value>0.98) was more suitable to describe the adsorption process of IPP and VPP than the intraparticle diffusion model and pseudo-first-order model. Similar results were observed when using the solutions with the different initial concentrations of 15, 20, and 25 mg·mL-1.Figure 7
Intraparticle diffusion kinetics of IPP adsorption onto MA-IML.Figure 8
Pseudo-first-order kinetics of IPP adsorption onto MA-IML.Figure 9
Pseudo-second-order kinetics of IPP adsorption onto MA-IML.Figure 10
Intraparticle diffusion kinetics of VPP adsorption onto MA-IML.Figure 11
Pseudo-first-order kinetics of VPP adsorption onto MA-IML.Figure 12
Pseudo-second-order kinetics of VPP adsorption onto MA-IML.Table 3
Adsorption kinetic constants of IPP onto MA-IML.
Initial concentration of IPP (mg·mL-1)
Intraparticle infusion model
Pseudo-first-order model
Pseudo-second-order model
kp (mg·g-1·min-1/2)
R2
k1 (min-1)
R2
k2 (g·mg-1·min-1)
R2
15
0.206
0.501
0.001
0.652
0.166
0.996
20
0.318
0.550
0.001
0.434
0.136
0.993
25
0.240
0.509
0.001
0.394
0.129
0.997Table 4
Adsorption kinetic constants of VPP onto MA-IML.
Initial concentration of VPP (mg·mL-1)
Intraparticle infusion model
Pseudo-first-order model
Pseudo-second-order model
kp (mg·g-1·min-1/2)
R2
k1 (min-1)
R2
k2 (g·mg-1·min-1)
R2
15
0.228
0.782
0.001
0.674
0.240
0.991
20
0.322
0.716
0.002
0.603
0.162
0.993
25
0.373
0.797
0.003
0.700
0.132
0.995It was the first trial that we used the prepared MA-IML to adsorb antihypertensive peptides and investigate the adsorption kinetics. But the nonselective adsorption has not been discussed in this research. More conventional Ni2+ substrates would be tested to confirm the practical application of MA-IML. The adsorption mechanism of MA-IML is similar to MA-ILC. The main difference is that we made magnetic liposomes instead of liposome chromatography in order to simplify the operations. Magnetic properties can help recycle the adsorbents with the aid of a magnet. The adsorption advantages of combining the metal affinity and the hydrophobic interaction of liposomes have been compared with IMAC and ILC [11]. In the further research, we would investigate the adsorption behaviors of more peptides and the adsorption specificity of MA-IML.


## 3.1. Characterization of HIDA

HIDA has the structure that allows it to be easily incorporated into liposome membranes due to the acyl chain attached to the ligand, iminodiacetic acid (IDA). The metal ion on the ML surface was to be immobilized through the coordination with HIDA [14]. However, HIDA is not currently on sale and was made in our laboratory. HIDA was successfully synthesized, and structure of HIDA was identified by MS and 1H-NMR. The MS spectrum of the synthetic HIDA is shown in Figure 1. The calculated m/z for C20H40O4N [M+] is 358.2799, which is consistent with the m/z for HIDA. Figure 2 shows the results of 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.40 (s, 4H), 2.61 (t, 2H), 1.23 (m, 28H), and 0.85 (t, 3H). The purity of the synthetic HIDA was above 99%.Figure 1
MS spectrum of the synthetic HIDA.Figure 2
1H-NMR spectrum of the synthetic HIDA.


## 3.2. Characterization of MA-IML

The lipid content and Ni2+ content of MA-IML were 143.25 μg/mg and 32 μmol/mg, respectively. The effects of the mass ratio of lipid/HIDA on the lipid and Ni2+ content in MA-IML are shown in Tables 1 and 2. The results in Table 1 showed that the lipid content increased as the mass ratio of lipid/HIDA varied from 1 to 5, while the Ni2+ content decreased as shown in Table 2. The adsorption capability to Ni2+ would be probably affected if the amount of HIDA was little, so the mass ratio of lipid/HIDA was not more than 5. When the mass ratio of lipid/HIDA was 1, the Ni2+ content was the maximum, but the lipid content was too low. Therefore, the mass ratio of lipid/HIDA of 2 was chosen when preparing MA-IML.Table 1
Lipid content of MA-IML according to the mass ratio of lipid/HIDA.
Lipid/HIDA
Lipid content (μg/mg)
1
104.30
2
143.25
3
157.42
4
164.92
5
173.70Table 2
Ni2+ content of MA-IML according to the mass ratio of lipid/HIDA.
Lipid/HIDA
Ni2+ content (μmol/mg)
1
35
2
32
3
11
4
5
5
4After negative staining with phosphotungstic acid solution, the lipid layer of MA-IML particle was observed by TEM (the light circle in Figure3), and the dark sphere in Figure 3 was the inner core consisting of Fe3O4. These particles were near-spherical and had good dispersity. The particle size distribution of MA-IML is shown in Figure 4. The results showed that MA-IML had a particle size distribution of 100-500 nm and an average particle size of about 300 nm.Figure 3
Transmission electron microscope image of MA-IML (×7000).Figure 4
Particle size distribution of MA-IML.


## 3.3. Adsorption Kinetic Study

Adsorption kinetics was usually evaluated to determine the contact time, which is required to reach the maximum adsorption capacity of an adsorbent with the equilibrium stage. Figures5 and 6 show the influences of contact time on the adsorption of IPP and VPP, respectively. The curves showed that the amount of IPP and VPP adsorbed was gradually increased in the first 30 min and the equilibrium adsorption capacity reached maximum at about 45 min. At this time, the adsorption rate was approximately equal to the desorption rate.Figure 5
Adsorption kinetic curves of IPP onto MA-IML.Figure 6
Adsorption kinetic curves of VPP onto MA-IML.Kinetic data were treated with the intraparticle diffusion model, pseudo-first-order model, and pseudo-second-order model, respectively. The fitting kinetic parameters of IPP or VPP absorbed onto MA-IML are shown in Figures7–12 and Tables 3 and 4. By comparing the R2 values of different models, it was found that the pseudo-second-order kinetics (R2value>0.98) was more suitable to describe the adsorption process of IPP and VPP than the intraparticle diffusion model and pseudo-first-order model. Similar results were observed when using the solutions with the different initial concentrations of 15, 20, and 25 mg·mL-1.Figure 7
Intraparticle diffusion kinetics of IPP adsorption onto MA-IML.Figure 8
Pseudo-first-order kinetics of IPP adsorption onto MA-IML.Figure 9
Pseudo-second-order kinetics of IPP adsorption onto MA-IML.Figure 10
Intraparticle diffusion kinetics of VPP adsorption onto MA-IML.Figure 11
Pseudo-first-order kinetics of VPP adsorption onto MA-IML.Figure 12
Pseudo-second-order kinetics of VPP adsorption onto MA-IML.Table 3
Adsorption kinetic constants of IPP onto MA-IML.
Initial concentration of IPP (mg·mL-1)
Intraparticle infusion model
Pseudo-first-order model
Pseudo-second-order model
kp (mg·g-1·min-1/2)
R2
k1 (min-1)
R2
k2 (g·mg-1·min-1)
R2
15
0.206
0.501
0.001
0.652
0.166
0.996
20
0.318
0.550
0.001
0.434
0.136
0.993
25
0.240
0.509
0.001
0.394
0.129
0.997Table 4
Adsorption kinetic constants of VPP onto MA-IML.
Initial concentration of VPP (mg·mL-1)
Intraparticle infusion model
Pseudo-first-order model
Pseudo-second-order model
kp (mg·g-1·min-1/2)
R2
k1 (min-1)
R2
k2 (g·mg-1·min-1)
R2
15
0.228
0.782
0.001
0.674
0.240
0.991
20
0.322
0.716
0.002
0.603
0.162
0.993
25
0.373
0.797
0.003
0.700
0.132
0.995It was the first trial that we used the prepared MA-IML to adsorb antihypertensive peptides and investigate the adsorption kinetics. But the nonselective adsorption has not been discussed in this research. More conventional Ni2+ substrates would be tested to confirm the practical application of MA-IML. The adsorption mechanism of MA-IML is similar to MA-ILC. The main difference is that we made magnetic liposomes instead of liposome chromatography in order to simplify the operations. Magnetic properties can help recycle the adsorbents with the aid of a magnet. The adsorption advantages of combining the metal affinity and the hydrophobic interaction of liposomes have been compared with IMAC and ILC [11]. In the further research, we would investigate the adsorption behaviors of more peptides and the adsorption specificity of MA-IML.


## 4. Conclusions

MA-IML was prepared in this research. The lipid content and Ni2+ content of MA-IML were 143.25 μg/mg and 32 μmol/mg, respectively. The MA-IML had a particle size distribution of 100-500 nm and an average particle size of about 300 nm. These particles were near-spherical and had good dispersity.The antihypertensive peptides IPP and VPP could be adsorbed onto MA-IML under specific conditions, and the adsorption kinetics was explored. Under the initial concentrations of 15, 20, and 25 mg·mL-1, the pseudo-second-order kinetics (R2value>0.98) was more suitable to describe the adsorption process of IPP and VPP than the intraparticle diffusion model and pseudo-first-order kinetic model. These results indicated that MA-IML could be used as an adsorbent for screening antihypertensive peptides that came from natural products.



---

*Source: 8731360-2020-02-11.xml*