# Synthesis of Fluorocyclotriphosphazene Derivatives and  Their Fire-Retardant Finishing on Cotton Fabrics

Authors: Li Zhanxiong; Du Liping
Journal: International Journal of Polymer Science
 (2010)

---

## Abstract

A series of novel fire-retardant agents, fluorocyclotriphosphazene derivatives with the substitution groups of 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropoxy groups were synthesized using hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene and 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl alcohol as starting materials. The synthesized fire-retardant agent was emulsified and applied on the cotton fabric finishing to reduce the flammability and afford water/oil repellency simultaneously. The optimum finishing process was achieved according to the test of cotton finishing with fluorocyclotriphosphazene. The treated cotton showed not only excellent fire-retardant performance, but also water and oil repellency with little change in strength and whiteness.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene was widely studied in the late 1970s [1]. Hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene itself exhibits excellent fire-retardant properties due to the high content of phosphorus and nitrogen. But unfortunately, this compound was hydrolytically unstable. Major effort, therefore, have been exerted to prepare phosphorous-nitrogen polymers, such as rubber and elastic material with high-temperature-resistant and low-temperature-resistant properties in military, aerospace industries, and so on. In addition, the hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene has been used as the raw material in syntheses of fire-retardant agents for plastics and fibers, biomedical materials, drug delivery agents, and so on [2–4]. As the hydrolytic stable fire-retardant agents, a wide range of phosphazene derivatives were prepared and reported with the substituent of hydroxyl, amino, carbon carbonyl groups, and other functional groups [5–9].It is true that the insertion of fluorine-containing substituent into phosphazene macromolecules may lead to an enhancement of the thermal stability, flame resistance, and especially, low-surface energy to the target molecule [10]. There are several ways in which fluorine atoms can be inserted into polyphosphazenes, all of which leading to different polymers showing a wide range of characteristics [11]. In this report, a series of fluorocyclotriphosphazene compounds were synthesized via substitution reaction using hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene and 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl alcohol as materials. As fluorine-containing phosphorus fire-retardant agent, the fluorocyclotriphosphazene products have been applied on cotton fabrics finishing to reduce the flammability and to afford water/oil repellency simultaneously.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Materials

Hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene (99.7% purity) was supplied by Shang Hai Fine Chemical Co. Ltd., China. 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl alcohol, and emulsifier agent Span-60 were supplied by Shang Hai Jia Chen Chemical Co. Ltd. The other chemicals and solvents were purchased as reagent-grade materials. Dimethylol dihydroxyethylene urea (DMDHEU) was obtained at 45% active ingredient as technical grade chemicals from Yingkou Tanyun Chemical Research Institute Corporation.


### 2.2. Synthesis of the Fire-Retardant Agent

Fluorocyclotri-phosphazene derivatives substituted with 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropoxy groups were synthesized according to the reaction as Scheme1. In the synthesis procedure, the molar ratio of hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene/sodium tetrafluoropropylate was designed to be 1 : 3, 1 : 4 or 1 : 5. As a result, three fire-retardant agents with the different substitution degree were obtained and coded as 1a, 1b, and 1c,respectively.Scheme 1


#### 2.2.1. Trichlorotris(2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropoxy)cycloph-ophazene(1a)

To 100 mL of tetrahydrofuran (THF) and 158 g (1.2 mol) of 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl alcohol in a 500 ml round-bottomed three-necked flask equipped with stirrer, 27.6 g of sodium (1.2 mol) was added stepwise. Sodium tetrafluoropropylate solution was obtained while the metallic sodium disappeared completely.96.6 g (0.4 mol) of hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene and 350 ml THF were poured into a 1000 ml round-bottom three-necked flask equipped with magnetic stirrer, thermometer, pressure equalizing dropping funnel, and a condenser. After the mixture was heated to 30°C under nitrogen, the preprepared sodium tetrafluoropropylate/THF solution was added dropwise within 1 h. The reaction was continued at 50°C for another 1 h. The resultant reaction mixture was cooled and filtered; the filtrate was concentrated in vacuum to remove THF and distilled to give 149 g of product as a clear liquid with the yield of 70.7% (GC purity is 95.7%).FT-IR(KBr, cm-1): υ1244.4 (P=N), 1111.6(C–O), 1071.1 (P–O) and 547.7(P–Cl). 1H NMR: δ 5.47~6.02(3H,HCF2−), 4.20~4.34(6H, –CH2−) ppm. 19F NMR: δ-126.3~126.4(2F), −141.1(2F)ppm. Calc. for C9H9N3O3F12Cl3P3(%): C, 17.02; H, 1.42; N, 6.62. Found: C, 17.60; H, 1.72; N, 6.10.


#### 2.2.2. Dichlorotetra(2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropoxy)cycloph-ophazene(1b)

1b was synthesized according to the procedure similar to that described in 1a. Sodium tetrafluoropropylate was prepared by treating of 32.2 g (1.4 mol) of sodium and 185 g (1.4 mol) of 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl alcohol in 100 mL THF.The Sodium tetrafluoropropylate solution was added to 84.5 g (0.35 mol) of hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene in 300 ml THF. Stirring was continued for 1h. By the similar procedure 131 g of1b was obtained with the yield to be 60.3%, and the purity 96.1%.FT-IR(KBr, cm-1): υ1230.2 (P=N), 1111.1(C–O), 1069.6 (P–O) and 546.9(P–Cl). 1H NMR: δ 5.73~6.02(4H,HCF2−), 4.20~4.53(8H, –CH2−) ppm. 19F NMR: δ-126.6~126.9(2F), −140.9(2F) ppm. Elemental analysis Calc. for C12H12N3O4F16Cl2P3(%): C, 19.73; H, 1.64; N, 5.75. Found: C, 20.20; H, 1.72; N, 5.80.


#### 2.2.3. Chloropenta(2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropoxy)cycloph-ophazene(1c)

1c was synthesized according to the procedure similar to that described in 1a, Sodium tetrafluoropropylate was prepared by treating of 34.5 g (1.5 mol) and 198 g (1.5 mol) 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl alcohol in 150 mL THF.The preprepared Sodium tetrafluoropropylate solution was added to 72.5 g (0.3 mol) hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene and 280 ml THF. Stirring was continued for 1 h. By the similar procedure 140 g of1c was obtained with the yield to be 65%, and the purity 94.7%.FT-IR(KBr, cm-1): υ1235.9 (P=N), 1111.2(C–O), 1070.1 (P–O) and 548.1(P–Cl). 1H NMR: δ 5.74~6.02 (5H,HCF2–), 4.20~4.53(10H, –CH2–) ppm. 19F NMR: δ-126.4~126.9(2F), −140.9(2F) ppm. Elemental analysis Calc. for C15H15N3O5F20ClP3(%): C, 21.80; H, 1.82; N, 5.09. Found: C, 22.20; H, 1.69; N, 4.80.


### 2.3. Fire-Retardant Finishing Process for Cotton Fabrics

The fabric was firstly immersed in a finishing solution containing fire-retardant agent 45% (owf), emulsifier agent 25% (owf), crosslinker agent 5% (owf), catalyst MgCl2 2% (owf) and urea 5% (owf), then passed through a laboratory padder with two dips and two nips, dried at 100°C for 3 min, and finally cured in a Mathis curing oven at 160°C for 3 min. All the ratios presented of emulsifier agent, crosslinkers agent, catalystand urea are based on the weight of fire-retardant agent. The wet pickup of the cotton fabric was approximately (100 ± 3)%.


### 2.4. Characterization

The treated and untreated cotton fabrics were observed on FT-TR spectrometer (Nicolet FT-IR 5700-Spectrometer, Thermo Fisher Scientific, America) on a KBr Pellet.1H NMR spectra were obtained on a Unity Inova-400 spectrometer (Varian, Inc.) using CDCl3-d1as the solvent. 19F NMR spectra were recorded on Brucker AM 300 (282 MHz) spectrometer using trifluoroacetic acid as external standard, downfield shifts being designed as negative.Thermogravimetric (TGA) and Differential Thermal Analysis (DTA) experiments were carried out using a Diamond TG/DTA 5700 thermogravimetric analyzer (Perkin EImer company, America). All liquid samples for TGA and DTA were measured from 40°C to 350°C at the heating rate of 10°C/min in a continuous nitrogen gas flow. All cotton samples for TGA and DTA were measured from 50°C to 650°C at the heating rate of 10°C/min in a continuous nitrogen gas flow.The surface of fabrics was observed on the scanning electron microscope (S-570, Hitachi). Magnification was 3000x. Wide angle X-ray diffraction measurement were carried out with X-ray multicrystal diffraction(X Pert-Pro MPD, Panalytical, Netherlands), usingCuKα (λ=0.1542 nm) radiation at a scan rate of 2°/min.The fire-retardant effect of cotton fabrics was measured according to GB/T 5455-1997 (Textiles-Burning Behaviour-Vertical method), which is adopted from ISO 6940-2004 (Textile fabrics—Burning behaviour—Determination of ease of ignition of vertically oriented specimens) equivalently. The levels of water repellency of the cotton fabrics were measured in accordance with the AATCC 22 (1996) spray test method. It measures the resistance of fabrics to wetting by pressurized water. The AATCC 22 spray test uses a set small quantity of water placed about four inches over a fabric. The fabric is set at a 45° angle to the stream of the liquid. The liquid is then allowed to gravity feed through a standardized spreader nozzle. The duration of exposure is about 30 s. At a glancing angle of 45° to the fabric, a visual rating of how well the water beads up, based on a scale of 100 points, is given to the fabrics. 100 is the best and 70 is considered the lowest passing grade. Oil repellency of cotton fabric was measured according to AATCC 118-2002 test method as below. The fabric was placed on the smooth plane. The corresponding oil with different surface energy was selected to drop on the fabric from low scores to high scores. It passed when the fabric was wetted by oil after 3 minutes until the highest scores were reached. Then the highest scores were the result of oil repellency of the fabric (Table1). The whiteness of cotton fabric was observed by a whiteness meter (WD-5 whiteness meter, Beijing Optical Instrument Plant).Table 1
Evalution standard of the oil repellency.
Scores15014013012011010090807050Liquid paraffin (%)01020304050607080100Heptanes (%)10090807060504030200


## 2.1. Materials

Hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene (99.7% purity) was supplied by Shang Hai Fine Chemical Co. Ltd., China. 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl alcohol, and emulsifier agent Span-60 were supplied by Shang Hai Jia Chen Chemical Co. Ltd. The other chemicals and solvents were purchased as reagent-grade materials. Dimethylol dihydroxyethylene urea (DMDHEU) was obtained at 45% active ingredient as technical grade chemicals from Yingkou Tanyun Chemical Research Institute Corporation.


## 2.2. Synthesis of the Fire-Retardant Agent

Fluorocyclotri-phosphazene derivatives substituted with 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropoxy groups were synthesized according to the reaction as Scheme1. In the synthesis procedure, the molar ratio of hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene/sodium tetrafluoropropylate was designed to be 1 : 3, 1 : 4 or 1 : 5. As a result, three fire-retardant agents with the different substitution degree were obtained and coded as 1a, 1b, and 1c,respectively.Scheme 1


### 2.2.1. Trichlorotris(2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropoxy)cycloph-ophazene(1a)

To 100 mL of tetrahydrofuran (THF) and 158 g (1.2 mol) of 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl alcohol in a 500 ml round-bottomed three-necked flask equipped with stirrer, 27.6 g of sodium (1.2 mol) was added stepwise. Sodium tetrafluoropropylate solution was obtained while the metallic sodium disappeared completely.96.6 g (0.4 mol) of hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene and 350 ml THF were poured into a 1000 ml round-bottom three-necked flask equipped with magnetic stirrer, thermometer, pressure equalizing dropping funnel, and a condenser. After the mixture was heated to 30°C under nitrogen, the preprepared sodium tetrafluoropropylate/THF solution was added dropwise within 1 h. The reaction was continued at 50°C for another 1 h. The resultant reaction mixture was cooled and filtered; the filtrate was concentrated in vacuum to remove THF and distilled to give 149 g of product as a clear liquid with the yield of 70.7% (GC purity is 95.7%).FT-IR(KBr, cm-1): υ1244.4 (P=N), 1111.6(C–O), 1071.1 (P–O) and 547.7(P–Cl). 1H NMR: δ 5.47~6.02(3H,HCF2−), 4.20~4.34(6H, –CH2−) ppm. 19F NMR: δ-126.3~126.4(2F), −141.1(2F)ppm. Calc. for C9H9N3O3F12Cl3P3(%): C, 17.02; H, 1.42; N, 6.62. Found: C, 17.60; H, 1.72; N, 6.10.


### 2.2.2. Dichlorotetra(2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropoxy)cycloph-ophazene(1b)

1b was synthesized according to the procedure similar to that described in 1a. Sodium tetrafluoropropylate was prepared by treating of 32.2 g (1.4 mol) of sodium and 185 g (1.4 mol) of 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl alcohol in 100 mL THF.The Sodium tetrafluoropropylate solution was added to 84.5 g (0.35 mol) of hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene in 300 ml THF. Stirring was continued for 1h. By the similar procedure 131 g of1b was obtained with the yield to be 60.3%, and the purity 96.1%.FT-IR(KBr, cm-1): υ1230.2 (P=N), 1111.1(C–O), 1069.6 (P–O) and 546.9(P–Cl). 1H NMR: δ 5.73~6.02(4H,HCF2−), 4.20~4.53(8H, –CH2−) ppm. 19F NMR: δ-126.6~126.9(2F), −140.9(2F) ppm. Elemental analysis Calc. for C12H12N3O4F16Cl2P3(%): C, 19.73; H, 1.64; N, 5.75. Found: C, 20.20; H, 1.72; N, 5.80.


### 2.2.3. Chloropenta(2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropoxy)cycloph-ophazene(1c)

1c was synthesized according to the procedure similar to that described in 1a, Sodium tetrafluoropropylate was prepared by treating of 34.5 g (1.5 mol) and 198 g (1.5 mol) 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl alcohol in 150 mL THF.The preprepared Sodium tetrafluoropropylate solution was added to 72.5 g (0.3 mol) hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene and 280 ml THF. Stirring was continued for 1 h. By the similar procedure 140 g of1c was obtained with the yield to be 65%, and the purity 94.7%.FT-IR(KBr, cm-1): υ1235.9 (P=N), 1111.2(C–O), 1070.1 (P–O) and 548.1(P–Cl). 1H NMR: δ 5.74~6.02 (5H,HCF2–), 4.20~4.53(10H, –CH2–) ppm. 19F NMR: δ-126.4~126.9(2F), −140.9(2F) ppm. Elemental analysis Calc. for C15H15N3O5F20ClP3(%): C, 21.80; H, 1.82; N, 5.09. Found: C, 22.20; H, 1.69; N, 4.80.


## 2.2.1. Trichlorotris(2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropoxy)cycloph-ophazene(1a)

To 100 mL of tetrahydrofuran (THF) and 158 g (1.2 mol) of 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl alcohol in a 500 ml round-bottomed three-necked flask equipped with stirrer, 27.6 g of sodium (1.2 mol) was added stepwise. Sodium tetrafluoropropylate solution was obtained while the metallic sodium disappeared completely.96.6 g (0.4 mol) of hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene and 350 ml THF were poured into a 1000 ml round-bottom three-necked flask equipped with magnetic stirrer, thermometer, pressure equalizing dropping funnel, and a condenser. After the mixture was heated to 30°C under nitrogen, the preprepared sodium tetrafluoropropylate/THF solution was added dropwise within 1 h. The reaction was continued at 50°C for another 1 h. The resultant reaction mixture was cooled and filtered; the filtrate was concentrated in vacuum to remove THF and distilled to give 149 g of product as a clear liquid with the yield of 70.7% (GC purity is 95.7%).FT-IR(KBr, cm-1): υ1244.4 (P=N), 1111.6(C–O), 1071.1 (P–O) and 547.7(P–Cl). 1H NMR: δ 5.47~6.02(3H,HCF2−), 4.20~4.34(6H, –CH2−) ppm. 19F NMR: δ-126.3~126.4(2F), −141.1(2F)ppm. Calc. for C9H9N3O3F12Cl3P3(%): C, 17.02; H, 1.42; N, 6.62. Found: C, 17.60; H, 1.72; N, 6.10.


## 2.2.2. Dichlorotetra(2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropoxy)cycloph-ophazene(1b)

1b was synthesized according to the procedure similar to that described in 1a. Sodium tetrafluoropropylate was prepared by treating of 32.2 g (1.4 mol) of sodium and 185 g (1.4 mol) of 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl alcohol in 100 mL THF.The Sodium tetrafluoropropylate solution was added to 84.5 g (0.35 mol) of hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene in 300 ml THF. Stirring was continued for 1h. By the similar procedure 131 g of1b was obtained with the yield to be 60.3%, and the purity 96.1%.FT-IR(KBr, cm-1): υ1230.2 (P=N), 1111.1(C–O), 1069.6 (P–O) and 546.9(P–Cl). 1H NMR: δ 5.73~6.02(4H,HCF2−), 4.20~4.53(8H, –CH2−) ppm. 19F NMR: δ-126.6~126.9(2F), −140.9(2F) ppm. Elemental analysis Calc. for C12H12N3O4F16Cl2P3(%): C, 19.73; H, 1.64; N, 5.75. Found: C, 20.20; H, 1.72; N, 5.80.


## 2.2.3. Chloropenta(2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropoxy)cycloph-ophazene(1c)

1c was synthesized according to the procedure similar to that described in 1a, Sodium tetrafluoropropylate was prepared by treating of 34.5 g (1.5 mol) and 198 g (1.5 mol) 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl alcohol in 150 mL THF.The preprepared Sodium tetrafluoropropylate solution was added to 72.5 g (0.3 mol) hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene and 280 ml THF. Stirring was continued for 1 h. By the similar procedure 140 g of1c was obtained with the yield to be 65%, and the purity 94.7%.FT-IR(KBr, cm-1): υ1235.9 (P=N), 1111.2(C–O), 1070.1 (P–O) and 548.1(P–Cl). 1H NMR: δ 5.74~6.02 (5H,HCF2–), 4.20~4.53(10H, –CH2–) ppm. 19F NMR: δ-126.4~126.9(2F), −140.9(2F) ppm. Elemental analysis Calc. for C15H15N3O5F20ClP3(%): C, 21.80; H, 1.82; N, 5.09. Found: C, 22.20; H, 1.69; N, 4.80.


## 2.3. Fire-Retardant Finishing Process for Cotton Fabrics

The fabric was firstly immersed in a finishing solution containing fire-retardant agent 45% (owf), emulsifier agent 25% (owf), crosslinker agent 5% (owf), catalyst MgCl2 2% (owf) and urea 5% (owf), then passed through a laboratory padder with two dips and two nips, dried at 100°C for 3 min, and finally cured in a Mathis curing oven at 160°C for 3 min. All the ratios presented of emulsifier agent, crosslinkers agent, catalystand urea are based on the weight of fire-retardant agent. The wet pickup of the cotton fabric was approximately (100 ± 3)%.


## 2.4. Characterization

The treated and untreated cotton fabrics were observed on FT-TR spectrometer (Nicolet FT-IR 5700-Spectrometer, Thermo Fisher Scientific, America) on a KBr Pellet.1H NMR spectra were obtained on a Unity Inova-400 spectrometer (Varian, Inc.) using CDCl3-d1as the solvent. 19F NMR spectra were recorded on Brucker AM 300 (282 MHz) spectrometer using trifluoroacetic acid as external standard, downfield shifts being designed as negative.Thermogravimetric (TGA) and Differential Thermal Analysis (DTA) experiments were carried out using a Diamond TG/DTA 5700 thermogravimetric analyzer (Perkin EImer company, America). All liquid samples for TGA and DTA were measured from 40°C to 350°C at the heating rate of 10°C/min in a continuous nitrogen gas flow. All cotton samples for TGA and DTA were measured from 50°C to 650°C at the heating rate of 10°C/min in a continuous nitrogen gas flow.The surface of fabrics was observed on the scanning electron microscope (S-570, Hitachi). Magnification was 3000x. Wide angle X-ray diffraction measurement were carried out with X-ray multicrystal diffraction(X Pert-Pro MPD, Panalytical, Netherlands), usingCuKα (λ=0.1542 nm) radiation at a scan rate of 2°/min.The fire-retardant effect of cotton fabrics was measured according to GB/T 5455-1997 (Textiles-Burning Behaviour-Vertical method), which is adopted from ISO 6940-2004 (Textile fabrics—Burning behaviour—Determination of ease of ignition of vertically oriented specimens) equivalently. The levels of water repellency of the cotton fabrics were measured in accordance with the AATCC 22 (1996) spray test method. It measures the resistance of fabrics to wetting by pressurized water. The AATCC 22 spray test uses a set small quantity of water placed about four inches over a fabric. The fabric is set at a 45° angle to the stream of the liquid. The liquid is then allowed to gravity feed through a standardized spreader nozzle. The duration of exposure is about 30 s. At a glancing angle of 45° to the fabric, a visual rating of how well the water beads up, based on a scale of 100 points, is given to the fabrics. 100 is the best and 70 is considered the lowest passing grade. Oil repellency of cotton fabric was measured according to AATCC 118-2002 test method as below. The fabric was placed on the smooth plane. The corresponding oil with different surface energy was selected to drop on the fabric from low scores to high scores. It passed when the fabric was wetted by oil after 3 minutes until the highest scores were reached. Then the highest scores were the result of oil repellency of the fabric (Table1). The whiteness of cotton fabric was observed by a whiteness meter (WD-5 whiteness meter, Beijing Optical Instrument Plant).Table 1
Evalution standard of the oil repellency.
Scores15014013012011010090807050Liquid paraffin (%)01020304050607080100Heptanes (%)10090807060504030200


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Effect of the Fire-Retardant Agent on the Finishing

Fluorocyclotriphosphazene derivatives with different numbers of fluoropropoxy groups substitution were obtained through changing the molar ratio of hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene/sodium tetrafluoropropylate. The obtained three fire-retardant agents of1a, 1b, and1c were all applied on the cotton fire-retardant finishing.When 35% (owf) of the fire-retardant agent was used in the fabric finishing, the treated cotton fabric was subjected to 3 times of home laundering cycles according to AATCC Test Method 124-2005. The burning char length of the cotton treated with different fire-retardant agent before and after washing is summarized in Table2.Table 2
Durability of the finishing with different fire-retardant agent.
Fire-retardant agentBurning char lengthBurning char lengthBefore Washed/cmAfter Washed/cm1a9.1burnt full length, little charobserved1b8.912.11c8.8burnt full length, no charobservedThe cotton sample finished with 1b was better than the fabric finished with 1a and 1c in retaining some fire-retardant property after 3 washes. Therefore, only the fire-retardant agent of1b, which was synthesized by controling the ratio of hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene/sodium tetrafluoropropylate of 1 : 4, was adopted in the application research. The Effect of concentration, amount of catalyst agent, crosslinking agent and curing temperature of was studied using 1b asfire-retardant agent.Table3 shows the effect of the fire-retardant agent concentration on the performance of the treated cotton fabrics. It can be seen that the increasing fire-retardant agent concentration reduced the burning char length and the breaking strength (weft) as well as the whiteness of the cotton fabric. Taking the fire-retardant performance, the breaking strength and the whiteness into consideration, the optimum concentration of the fire-retardant agent was selected to be 35% (owf) [9].Table 3Fire-retardant agent concentration/%Afterflame time/sAfterglow time/sBurning char length/cmBreaking strength/N (weft)Whiteness/%207013.9225.683.37256012.5220.782.85304010.4212.482.3435308.9206.581.9840207.8199.581.35


### 3.2. Effect of Catalyst Agent

Catalysts can promote the reaction among the fire-retardant agent, crosslinking agent and cellulose macromolecules during the finishing procedure, and thus improve the fire-retardant performance of the treated fabrics (Table4). The effect of concentration of the catalyst was similar to that of the fire-retardant agent. It can be seen that the burning char length decreased to 8.4 cm as the catalyst concentration increased to 3% (owf). Accordingly, taking the burning char length, the breaking strength and the whiteness into consideration, the optimum catalyst concentration was selected to be 2% (owf).Table 4
Effect of the catalyst agent concentration on the fire-retardant performance.
Catalyst agent /%Afterflame time/sAfterglow time/sBurning char length/cmBreaking strength/N (weft)Whiteness (%)0.5309.4209.882.071309.3209.482.032308.9206.581.983208.4199.881.95Cotton fabric was treated with different catalyst agent concentration, 35% (owf) fire-retardant agent, 5% (owf) crosslinking agent, 5%(owf) urea and was cured at 160°C for 3 min.


### 3.3. Effect of Crosslinking Agent

Crosslinking agent played a complicated role in the fire-retardant finishing. When cotton fabric is treated with a reactant resin DMDHEU in presence of MgCl2·6H2O, the following major reactions are expected to occur. It is the crosslinking reaction between cellulose molecules and fire retardant agents with the resin molecule afford a bridge between cellulose molecules and fire retardant agents [12]. The major reaction is expected to occur as follow (see Scheme 2).Scheme 2The crosslinking reaction with cellulose macromolecules and fire-retardant agentviaa reactant crosslinking resins can increase the durability or retention of the fire-retardant agents on cotton fibers, and improve the fire-retardant performance of fabrics. As summarized in Table 5, the crosslinking agent improved the fire-retardant performance of the cotton fabrics but made the breaking strength decreased from 211.7N to 194.9N when increasing the concentration of crosslinking agent from 3% to 9%. As a result, 5% concentration was chosen to be the optimum condition of the crosslinking agent.Table 5
Effect of the crosslinking agent concentration on the fire-retardant performance.
Crosslinking agent concentration /%Afterflame time/sAfterglow time /sBurning char length/cmBreaking strength/N (weft)3409.9211.75308.9206.57207.8199.79106.9194.9Cotton fabric was treated with crosslink agent, 35% (owf) fire-retardant agent, 2% (owf) catalyst MgCl2, 5% (owf) urea and was cured at 160°C for 3 min.


### 3.4. Effect of the Curing Temperature

The purpose of curing is to promote the reaction among the fire-retardant agent, cellulose macromolecules and crosslinking agent, and thus to form a stable crosslinked bond among these three components. These crosslinking polymeric networks on the fabric were expected to enhance the fire-retardant performance. The effect of the curing temperature on the fire-retardant performance was investigated and the result was summarized in Table6. It can be seen that the increase of the curing temperature can improve the fire-retardant performance, which might be attributed to the generation of more crosslinked networks in the case of higher curing temperature. However, the higher curing temperature decreased the whiteness due to the unexpected oxidation reaction, which led to the yellowing of cotton fabric. Taking all factors into consideration, the optimum curing temperature is preferred to be 160°C.Table 6
Effect of the curing temperature on the fire-retardant performance
Curing temperature/°CAfterflame time/sAfterglow time /sBurning char length/cmWhiteness/%1405010.982. 85150409.781. 59160308.981. 98170208.472. 47Cotton fabric was treated with  45% (owf) fire-retardant agent, 2% (owf) catalyst MgCl2, 5% (owf) crosslink agent, 5% (owf) urea and was cured at different temperature for 3 min.As a result, the optimum finishing processes was as following: 35% (owf) of fire-retardant agent1b (35% w/w based on the total bath), 25 owf % of emulsifier agent, 5% (owf) of crosslinking agent, 2% (owf) of catalyst (MgCl2), 5% (owf) of urea, curing temperature of 160°C and 3 minutes of curing time. Test was finished to contrast the untreated cotton fabric (A) and the cotton fabric treated with fire-retardant agent 1b (fabric B) according to the optimum finishing processes.


### 3.5. FT-IR Spectra Analyses

Figure1 illustrated the FT-IR spectra of the untreated cotton fabric (A) and the cotton fabric treated with fire-retardant agent 1b (fabric B). In the spectra of the cotton A, The –OH, C–H, –CH2 and C–O–C absorption bands of cellulose were found at 3411.5 cm-1, 2900 cm-1, 1431.5 cm-1and 1060.2 cm-1, respectively. Besides these characteristic absorption bands of cellulose fiber, the FT-IR spectra of the treated cotton B showed three new absorption peaks at 1585.5 cm-1, 1507.1 cm-1, and 814.1 cm-1, which were assigned to C=N, N–H and P=N group respectively. It is worthy of noting that the P–O absorption band in the treated cotton was shifted to 1031.7cm-1 as compared with it in cyclotriphosphazene derivative at 1069.6 cm-1, which can be attributed to the introduction of the cellulose groups. FTIR spectra demonstrates that the fire-retardant agent reacted with –OH groups of cellulose during finishing.Figure 1
FT-IR spectra of the untreated (A) and the treated cotton (B).Figure2 shows the FT-IR spectra of fire-retardant agent 1b. The P=N, C–O, P–O absorption of the fire-retardant agent were observed at 1230.2 cm-1, 1111.1 cm-1, and 1069.6 cm-1, respectively. It is indicated that 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl alcohol had reacted with hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene. However, the absorption peak at 546.9 cm-1 of P–Cl bond suggested that the product of 1b was fluorocyclotriphosphazene derivative with tetrafluoropropoxy groups substitution partly.Figure 2
FT-IR spectra of fire-retardant agent1b.


### 3.6. Thermal Analysis

Figure3 depicted the TG and DTG curves of the fire-retardant agent. The maximum rate of weight loss was determined to be 205°C by the peak of the DTG curve in Figure 3.Figure 3
TG and DTG curves of fire-retardant agent1b.The fire-retardant finishing of cellulose fiber was mainly carried out by lowering the decomposition temperature and increasing quantity of the solid residual. As it can be seen in the TG curves of the untreated (A) and treated (B) cotton fabrics (Figure4), the maximum rate of weight loss of the untreated cotton fabrics appeared at 371°C as determined by the peak of DTG process. The weight loss of the untreated cotton was attributed to the thermal decomposition of cellulose, which resulted in the breakage of the main chain of cellulose macromolecule. This result was also confirmed by the endothermic peak at 371°C in the DTA curves of the cotton fabric (Figure 5).Figure 4
TG curves of the untreated (A) and treated cotton (B).Figure 5
DTA curves of the untreated (A) and treated cotton (B).In contrast with that of the untreated cotton, the maximum rate of weight loss of the treated cotton fabric was found to shift to low temperature (290°C as determined by both DTG process and DTA curves). It suggests that the fire-retardant agent decomposed and escaped from the fabrics before the fire point temperature. On the other hand, as compared with 89% weight lost of the untreated cotton, the treated fabric was observed with only 66% weight lost as the temperature increased to 500°C (Figure4). It indicates that the presence of the fire-retardant agent lowered the decomposition temperature and promoted the formation of char in pyrolysis of the fabric.In general, the reactions of the cellulose dehydration, esterification, charring and phosphorylation were promoted due to the formation of phosphoric acid and phosphate when heating the cotton fabric which has been treated with phosphorus fire-retardant agent. These reactions would contribute to form crosslinking polymeric network in the decomposition, and thus increase the solid residual. The latter can slow the thermal decomposition of the cotton matrix, and the water from cellulose dehydration could absorb large amount of latent heat and lower the temperature.


### 3.7. Test of Treated Cotton Fabrics

Figure6 presented the SEM micrographs of the cotton fabrics. The fibers in the treated cotton were found to be covered by a layer of film and be adhered mutually. It suggested that the treated fabric has been covered with a polymeric network, which was formed by the crosslinking reaction among the fire-retardant agent, crosslinking agent and cellulose.SEM micrographs of the untreated (a) and treated cotton (b).
(a)(b)Figure7 shows the result of X-ray diffraction of the cotton fabrics. Both of the untreated(A) and treated fabric (B) were found to present three strong absorption bands at 2θ of 22.7°, 14.9° and 16.4°, respectively, and there is little difference between the X-ray diffraction profile of the cottons before and after treatment. It suggested that the fire-retardant finishing mainly carried out in amorphous area of the fiber.Figure 7
X-ray diffraction profiles of the untreated (A) and treated cotton (B).The water and oil repellency of untreated and treated fabrics were tested. The results showed that the finished cotton fabric could reach level 1 for water repellency and 70 scores for oil repellency. As a result, the introduction of fluorine containing alkyl groups into fire-retardant agent can afford certain water and oil repellency efficiency to fabric finishing.


## 3.1. Effect of the Fire-Retardant Agent on the Finishing

Fluorocyclotriphosphazene derivatives with different numbers of fluoropropoxy groups substitution were obtained through changing the molar ratio of hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene/sodium tetrafluoropropylate. The obtained three fire-retardant agents of1a, 1b, and1c were all applied on the cotton fire-retardant finishing.When 35% (owf) of the fire-retardant agent was used in the fabric finishing, the treated cotton fabric was subjected to 3 times of home laundering cycles according to AATCC Test Method 124-2005. The burning char length of the cotton treated with different fire-retardant agent before and after washing is summarized in Table2.Table 2
Durability of the finishing with different fire-retardant agent.
Fire-retardant agentBurning char lengthBurning char lengthBefore Washed/cmAfter Washed/cm1a9.1burnt full length, little charobserved1b8.912.11c8.8burnt full length, no charobservedThe cotton sample finished with 1b was better than the fabric finished with 1a and 1c in retaining some fire-retardant property after 3 washes. Therefore, only the fire-retardant agent of1b, which was synthesized by controling the ratio of hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene/sodium tetrafluoropropylate of 1 : 4, was adopted in the application research. The Effect of concentration, amount of catalyst agent, crosslinking agent and curing temperature of was studied using 1b asfire-retardant agent.Table3 shows the effect of the fire-retardant agent concentration on the performance of the treated cotton fabrics. It can be seen that the increasing fire-retardant agent concentration reduced the burning char length and the breaking strength (weft) as well as the whiteness of the cotton fabric. Taking the fire-retardant performance, the breaking strength and the whiteness into consideration, the optimum concentration of the fire-retardant agent was selected to be 35% (owf) [9].Table 3Fire-retardant agent concentration/%Afterflame time/sAfterglow time/sBurning char length/cmBreaking strength/N (weft)Whiteness/%207013.9225.683.37256012.5220.782.85304010.4212.482.3435308.9206.581.9840207.8199.581.35


## 3.2. Effect of Catalyst Agent

Catalysts can promote the reaction among the fire-retardant agent, crosslinking agent and cellulose macromolecules during the finishing procedure, and thus improve the fire-retardant performance of the treated fabrics (Table4). The effect of concentration of the catalyst was similar to that of the fire-retardant agent. It can be seen that the burning char length decreased to 8.4 cm as the catalyst concentration increased to 3% (owf). Accordingly, taking the burning char length, the breaking strength and the whiteness into consideration, the optimum catalyst concentration was selected to be 2% (owf).Table 4
Effect of the catalyst agent concentration on the fire-retardant performance.
Catalyst agent /%Afterflame time/sAfterglow time/sBurning char length/cmBreaking strength/N (weft)Whiteness (%)0.5309.4209.882.071309.3209.482.032308.9206.581.983208.4199.881.95Cotton fabric was treated with different catalyst agent concentration, 35% (owf) fire-retardant agent, 5% (owf) crosslinking agent, 5%(owf) urea and was cured at 160°C for 3 min.


## 3.3. Effect of Crosslinking Agent

Crosslinking agent played a complicated role in the fire-retardant finishing. When cotton fabric is treated with a reactant resin DMDHEU in presence of MgCl2·6H2O, the following major reactions are expected to occur. It is the crosslinking reaction between cellulose molecules and fire retardant agents with the resin molecule afford a bridge between cellulose molecules and fire retardant agents [12]. The major reaction is expected to occur as follow (see Scheme 2).Scheme 2The crosslinking reaction with cellulose macromolecules and fire-retardant agentviaa reactant crosslinking resins can increase the durability or retention of the fire-retardant agents on cotton fibers, and improve the fire-retardant performance of fabrics. As summarized in Table 5, the crosslinking agent improved the fire-retardant performance of the cotton fabrics but made the breaking strength decreased from 211.7N to 194.9N when increasing the concentration of crosslinking agent from 3% to 9%. As a result, 5% concentration was chosen to be the optimum condition of the crosslinking agent.Table 5
Effect of the crosslinking agent concentration on the fire-retardant performance.
Crosslinking agent concentration /%Afterflame time/sAfterglow time /sBurning char length/cmBreaking strength/N (weft)3409.9211.75308.9206.57207.8199.79106.9194.9Cotton fabric was treated with crosslink agent, 35% (owf) fire-retardant agent, 2% (owf) catalyst MgCl2, 5% (owf) urea and was cured at 160°C for 3 min.


## 3.4. Effect of the Curing Temperature

The purpose of curing is to promote the reaction among the fire-retardant agent, cellulose macromolecules and crosslinking agent, and thus to form a stable crosslinked bond among these three components. These crosslinking polymeric networks on the fabric were expected to enhance the fire-retardant performance. The effect of the curing temperature on the fire-retardant performance was investigated and the result was summarized in Table6. It can be seen that the increase of the curing temperature can improve the fire-retardant performance, which might be attributed to the generation of more crosslinked networks in the case of higher curing temperature. However, the higher curing temperature decreased the whiteness due to the unexpected oxidation reaction, which led to the yellowing of cotton fabric. Taking all factors into consideration, the optimum curing temperature is preferred to be 160°C.Table 6
Effect of the curing temperature on the fire-retardant performance
Curing temperature/°CAfterflame time/sAfterglow time /sBurning char length/cmWhiteness/%1405010.982. 85150409.781. 59160308.981. 98170208.472. 47Cotton fabric was treated with  45% (owf) fire-retardant agent, 2% (owf) catalyst MgCl2, 5% (owf) crosslink agent, 5% (owf) urea and was cured at different temperature for 3 min.As a result, the optimum finishing processes was as following: 35% (owf) of fire-retardant agent1b (35% w/w based on the total bath), 25 owf % of emulsifier agent, 5% (owf) of crosslinking agent, 2% (owf) of catalyst (MgCl2), 5% (owf) of urea, curing temperature of 160°C and 3 minutes of curing time. Test was finished to contrast the untreated cotton fabric (A) and the cotton fabric treated with fire-retardant agent 1b (fabric B) according to the optimum finishing processes.


## 3.5. FT-IR Spectra Analyses

Figure1 illustrated the FT-IR spectra of the untreated cotton fabric (A) and the cotton fabric treated with fire-retardant agent 1b (fabric B). In the spectra of the cotton A, The –OH, C–H, –CH2 and C–O–C absorption bands of cellulose were found at 3411.5 cm-1, 2900 cm-1, 1431.5 cm-1and 1060.2 cm-1, respectively. Besides these characteristic absorption bands of cellulose fiber, the FT-IR spectra of the treated cotton B showed three new absorption peaks at 1585.5 cm-1, 1507.1 cm-1, and 814.1 cm-1, which were assigned to C=N, N–H and P=N group respectively. It is worthy of noting that the P–O absorption band in the treated cotton was shifted to 1031.7cm-1 as compared with it in cyclotriphosphazene derivative at 1069.6 cm-1, which can be attributed to the introduction of the cellulose groups. FTIR spectra demonstrates that the fire-retardant agent reacted with –OH groups of cellulose during finishing.Figure 1
FT-IR spectra of the untreated (A) and the treated cotton (B).Figure2 shows the FT-IR spectra of fire-retardant agent 1b. The P=N, C–O, P–O absorption of the fire-retardant agent were observed at 1230.2 cm-1, 1111.1 cm-1, and 1069.6 cm-1, respectively. It is indicated that 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl alcohol had reacted with hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene. However, the absorption peak at 546.9 cm-1 of P–Cl bond suggested that the product of 1b was fluorocyclotriphosphazene derivative with tetrafluoropropoxy groups substitution partly.Figure 2
FT-IR spectra of fire-retardant agent1b.


## 3.6. Thermal Analysis

Figure3 depicted the TG and DTG curves of the fire-retardant agent. The maximum rate of weight loss was determined to be 205°C by the peak of the DTG curve in Figure 3.Figure 3
TG and DTG curves of fire-retardant agent1b.The fire-retardant finishing of cellulose fiber was mainly carried out by lowering the decomposition temperature and increasing quantity of the solid residual. As it can be seen in the TG curves of the untreated (A) and treated (B) cotton fabrics (Figure4), the maximum rate of weight loss of the untreated cotton fabrics appeared at 371°C as determined by the peak of DTG process. The weight loss of the untreated cotton was attributed to the thermal decomposition of cellulose, which resulted in the breakage of the main chain of cellulose macromolecule. This result was also confirmed by the endothermic peak at 371°C in the DTA curves of the cotton fabric (Figure 5).Figure 4
TG curves of the untreated (A) and treated cotton (B).Figure 5
DTA curves of the untreated (A) and treated cotton (B).In contrast with that of the untreated cotton, the maximum rate of weight loss of the treated cotton fabric was found to shift to low temperature (290°C as determined by both DTG process and DTA curves). It suggests that the fire-retardant agent decomposed and escaped from the fabrics before the fire point temperature. On the other hand, as compared with 89% weight lost of the untreated cotton, the treated fabric was observed with only 66% weight lost as the temperature increased to 500°C (Figure4). It indicates that the presence of the fire-retardant agent lowered the decomposition temperature and promoted the formation of char in pyrolysis of the fabric.In general, the reactions of the cellulose dehydration, esterification, charring and phosphorylation were promoted due to the formation of phosphoric acid and phosphate when heating the cotton fabric which has been treated with phosphorus fire-retardant agent. These reactions would contribute to form crosslinking polymeric network in the decomposition, and thus increase the solid residual. The latter can slow the thermal decomposition of the cotton matrix, and the water from cellulose dehydration could absorb large amount of latent heat and lower the temperature.


## 3.7. Test of Treated Cotton Fabrics

Figure6 presented the SEM micrographs of the cotton fabrics. The fibers in the treated cotton were found to be covered by a layer of film and be adhered mutually. It suggested that the treated fabric has been covered with a polymeric network, which was formed by the crosslinking reaction among the fire-retardant agent, crosslinking agent and cellulose.SEM micrographs of the untreated (a) and treated cotton (b).
(a)(b)Figure7 shows the result of X-ray diffraction of the cotton fabrics. Both of the untreated(A) and treated fabric (B) were found to present three strong absorption bands at 2θ of 22.7°, 14.9° and 16.4°, respectively, and there is little difference between the X-ray diffraction profile of the cottons before and after treatment. It suggested that the fire-retardant finishing mainly carried out in amorphous area of the fiber.Figure 7
X-ray diffraction profiles of the untreated (A) and treated cotton (B).The water and oil repellency of untreated and treated fabrics were tested. The results showed that the finished cotton fabric could reach level 1 for water repellency and 70 scores for oil repellency. As a result, the introduction of fluorine containing alkyl groups into fire-retardant agent can afford certain water and oil repellency efficiency to fabric finishing.


## 4. Conclusions

In the current research, a kind of fluorocyclotriphosphazene derivative was synthesized and applied to the fire-retardant finishing on cotton fabrics. Good finishing result was achieved by optimizing the finishing process, with the optimum process conditions of: 35% (owf) of the fire-retardant agent, 5% (owf) of the crosslinking agent, 2% (owf) of catalyst MgCl2, 160°C of curing temperature and curing time of 3 min. The optimum finishing provided the treated cotton fabric with excellent fire-retardant performance. The burning char length of treated cotton was tested to be only 8.9 cm and whiteness to be 81.9%.The new fire-retardant agent can reduce the flammability of the treated cotton fabrics with little change in strength and whiteness. Simultaneously, the fluoroalkyl groups in the phosphorus fire-retardant agent can afford the treated cotton with water and oil repellency.The P–Cl bond in the fire-retardant agent molecule can be used as reactive group to react with -OH on the cotton fiber. The cotton sample finished with Dichlorotetra(2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropoxy)cyclophophazene(1b) can retain some fire-retardant property after 3 washes.



---

*Source: 867825-2010-07-26.xml*