# Pounding Dynamic Responses of Sliding Base-Isolated Rectangular Liquid-Storage Structure considering Soil-Structure Interactions

Authors: Xuansheng Cheng; Wei Jing; Jia Chen; Xiaoyan Zhang
Journal: Shock and Vibration
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

The soil-structure interaction (SSI) is simulated by an artificial boundary, the pounding that occurs between the sliding base-isolated rectangular liquid-storage structure (LSS) and the surrounding moat wall is considered, the instantaneous pounding is simulated using the Hertz-damp model, and a simplified mechanical model with two particles and four degrees of freedom is established. Dynamic equation is obtained using Hamilton principle; effects of SSI, initial gap, and friction coefficient on the pounding responses under the action of near-field pulse-like Chi-Chi earthquake and far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake are studied. The results show that SSI will amplify liquid sloshing height but that structural acceleration and impact force will be reduced because of SSI. The responses caused by Chi-Chi earthquake are far greater than those of Imperial Valley-06 earthquake. Initial gap has a small effect on liquid sloshing height; structural acceleration and impact force first increase as the initial gap increases and then begin to decrease; in the design of moat wall of sliding isolation LSS, a certain gap exists that will more adversely affect the pounding responses of structure. Liquid sloshing height is less affected by coefficient of friction, but structural acceleration and impact force decrease as friction coefficient increases in general.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In lifeline engineering, liquid-storage structures play irreplaceable roles in the development of a national economy, but many earthquakes have caused different degrees of damage to the liquid-storage structures. Because of the uniqueness of this type of structure, failure causes some types of disaster, such as a fluid leakage, fire, or environment pollution. An effective means to improve the seismic capacity for this structure is a special base isolation structure that has been used widely. One of the main shock absorption measures is rubber isolation, which can reduce dynamic responses, such as base shear, overturning moment, and wall internal force, of the liquid-storage structure, but its effect on liquid sloshing is very limited and may even produce the opposite effect [1–4]. However, some new types of sliding isolation methods can achieve independence of the isolation period and liquid sloshing period [5] and avoid the resonance phenomenon, which can reduce both the structural dynamic responses and liquid sloshing simultaneously [6, 7]. Therefore, if this design is reasonable, the effect of this sliding base-isolated technology will be better than rubber base isolation [8, 9].Although the sliding isolation measure can effectively reduce the structure dynamic responses, one characteristic of a sliding isolation structure is that it will suffer a large horizontal displacement during an earthquake. For normal use and structural safety, it is very necessary to use a corresponding limiting displacement method. At present, a common method, the moat wall, is widely used in various types of base-isolated structures. Although the moat wall can control the base-isolated structure displacement [10], the pounding between the isolation structure and moat wall greatly affects the system dynamic responses. In recent years, some scholars have paid attention to the pounding problem of the base-isolated structure caused by an earthquake and have achieved certain results. Nagarajaiah and Sun [11] assessed the dynamic responses of a base-isolated structure used for a fire control command, which was destroyed because of structure and moat wall pounding during the 1994 Northridge earthquake. The results showed that the pounding increased the base-isolated structure dynamic responses. Matsagar and Jangid [12] assumed that pounding occurred only between the bottom of the structure and the moat wall and studied the pounding dynamic responses of a building with various isolation systems. Komodromos [13] concluded that the dynamic responses caused by pounding increased as the impact stiffness and isolation system stiffness increased based on numerical simulations. Fu et al. [14] determined that the dynamic responses caused by pounding could change the basic mode of the base-isolated structure and excite a higher mode of the structure. Masroor and Mosqueda [15] considered the moat wall flexibility in a pounding model of an isolated structure and found that the moat wall characteristics greatly influenced the amplification of the dynamic response and degree of damage. Pant and Wijeyewickrema [16] considered different earthquake excitations and found that the pounding effect had a significant effect on the performance of an isolated structure. Fan et al. [17] studied the vulnerability of an isolation structure with a moat wall and determined that the structure mass and mechanical parameters of an isolation bearing had a greater effect on the maximum base displacement. Khatiwada and Chouw [18] noted that the impact stiffness and coefficient of restitution were the main factors influencing the pounding responses.The foundation effect is not considered in the above studies when the base-isolated structure collides with the moat wall, but the SSI has a significant effect on the vibrational frequency [19], the system damping ratio and rotational displacement of the foundation [20], the structural dynamic responses [21], and the reasonable choice of the isolation bearing [22] of an isolation structure. Currently, studies of the SSI on the pounding dynamic responses of a structure are very limited [23]. Chau et al. [24] noted that the vibrational response of the structure could be amplified but that the SSI could suppress the vibrational response caused by pounding. Mahmoud and Gutub [25] found that the SSI effect had a more significant effect on isolated buildings located on a soft soil, and the SSI effect could increase the number of collisions between the structure and surrounding moat wall. Shakya and Wijeyewickrema [26] used the gap element and Kelvin-Voigt model to simulate the pounding problem and found that the dynamic responses of the structure will be reduced when the foundation is considered.In summary, the effect of the SSI on the structural dynamic responses is obvious. Although the probability of pounding of the sliding base-isolated structure with the moat wall is larger than the rubber isolation, studies on the dynamic responses of a sliding isolation structure that consider the SSI have not been performed. The spring-mass model is used to simulate the coupling problem of the sliding base-isolated liquid-storage structure, and the 2D viscoelastic artificial boundary is used to simulate the foundation effect. A simplified mechanical model and the corresponding dynamic equations of the sliding isolation rectangular liquid-storage structure that consider the SSI and pounding are established, and the dynamic responses of the rectangular liquid-storage structure experiencing near-field pulse-like Chi-Chi earthquake and far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake are studied. Sliding isolation has a certain advantage in the shock absorption of a liquid-storage structure, and theoretical research on this type of damping method is helpful to its future application.


## 2. Calculation Model

### 2.1. Foundation Model

To consider the foundation effect, the lumped parameter model is used to simulate the elastic foundation and the discrete model, which is based on the theory of a homogeneous, isotropic, and elastic half space. Translation and rotation of the foundation are simulated using the spring element and damping element, respectively, and the corresponding parameters can be calculated by using the following equations [27]:(1)kh=21-νGβxBL,ch=0.576khrhρG,kr=G1-νβφBL2,cr=0.31+βφkrrrρG,where ν is Poisson’s ratio; G is the shear modulus; and βx and βφ are the constants to correct the translation and rotation of the spring, respectively. βx and βφ have strong relationships with the foundation length-width ratio, and according to the existing literature [27], the approximate values of βx and βφ are equal to 1, L and B are the foundation length and width, respectively, and L and B are parallel and perpendicular to the direction of earthquake, respectively. ρ is soil density, and rh and rr are equivalent radii of the foundation that correspond to translation and rotation, respectively. The maximum shear modulus Gmax is only suitable when the soil is in the low strain condition, and it can be expressed as a function of the shear wave velocity Vs and soil density ρ(2)Gmax=ρVs2.When the soil is in the inelastic stage, the shear modulusG is significantly reduced. The shear modulus G will be changed when the shear strain γ is beyond the range of the elastic state because of a dynamic effect. To realistically simulate the ground effect, the shear modulus G needs to be reduced by introducing the shear modulus reduction curve (G/Gmax-1) [27], and the shear strain γ can be expressed as(3)γ=V42π0.534r26Vs2ρ0.061+0.18r8+0.3026+M42π0.513.840rr32r26Vs2ρ,where V is the horizontal shear force and M is the overturning moment.


### 2.2. Pounding Calculation Model

Sliding base-isolated liquid-storage structures will suffer large amounts of slippage under the action of some strong earthquakes. Thus, the pounding dynamic responses caused by pounding between the liquid-storage structure and moat wall are important subjects to study. The contact element method is an effective technique to simulate pounding problems; common pounding models include the linear model, Kelvin model, Hertz model, and Hertz-damp model [24, 28–31]. Muthumar and Desroches [29] concluded that, for the same parameters, the differences in the displacements and acceleration calculated by the different models are within 12%. Chau et al. [24] and Jankowski [31] systematically compared the numerical and experimental results of the pounding models for different materials and showed that both the linear and nonlinear pounding models could satisfy the precision requirements for engineering.Previous experimental studies have shown that the energy loss during the pounding process is mainly concentrated when the two objects are approaching each other but is relatively small during the recovery phase [32]. The modified Hertz model (Hertz-damp model), which is composed of nonlinear springs and a nonlinear damping element (Figure 1), is chosen to simulate the pounding. The model does not consider the energy loss in the pounding recovery phase and assumes that all of the energy loss caused by pounding occurs as the two objects approach each other [31]. The contact forces during the pounding and recovery phases can be expressed as (4) and (5), respectively.Figure 1
Hertz-damp pounding model.The pounding occurs on the left:(4)Fp=-kimp-ub-gp3/2-cimpu˙b;-ub-gp>0,u˙b<0Fp=-kimp-ub-gp3/2;-ub-gp>0,u˙b>0Fp=0;-ub-gp≤0.The pounding occurs on the right:(5)Fp=kimpub-gp3/2+cimpu˙b;ub-gp>0,u˙b>0Fp=kimpub-gp3/2;ub-gp>0,u˙b<0Fp=0;ub-gp≤0,where ub is the horizontal displacement of the liquid-storage structure; gp is the initial gap between the structure and surrounding moat wall or restraining wall; u˙b is the structural velocity; kimp is the impact stiffness; and cimp is the pounding damping. The parameters kimp and cimp can be obtained from (6)–(9) [29]:(6)kimp=43π1λ1+λ2R1R2R1+R2λi=1-νi2πEii=1,2Ri=3mi4πρi3i=1,2,where λ1 and λ2 are the material parameters; νi and Ei are Poisson’s ratio and elastic modulus of the pounding body, respectively; Ri is the equivalent radius of the pounding body; and mi and ρi are the mass and density of the pounding body, respectively.The pounding occurs on the left:(7)cimp=2ξimpkimp-ub-gpmc+mi+m0+m.The pounding occurs on the right:(8)cimp=2ξimpkimpub-gpmc+mi+m0+m,where ξimp is the impact damping ratio, which can be expressed as a function of the coefficient of restitution (COR) [33](9)ξimp=9521-COR2CORCOR9π-16+16.After two objects collide with each other, the reasonable COR greatly influences the rationality of the model. For most pounding problems of engineering structures, the range of CORs is 0.5–0.75 [31].


### 2.3. Simplified Model of a Sliding Isolation Rectangular Liquid-Storage Structure considering the SSI and Pounding

When the sliding base-isolated liquid-storage structure with moat wall (Figure2) experiences a large earthquake and its magnitude of slippage exceeds the initial gap, the structure will collide with the moat wall. To study the influence of pounding on the dynamic responses of the liquid-storage structure, a reasonable calculation model should be developed. Currently, the spring-mass model is generally used as a simplification of the liquid-storage structure, and the structural dynamic responses are generally calculated accurately [34]. In this paper, the liquid is represented using a two-particle model [35]. The liquid is divided into 2 parts: rigid mass m0 and convective mass mc. In addition, the mass of the reinforced concrete structure m is large, so m should also be considered in the dynamic analysis. Because of the assumption that m0 moves with the liquid-storage structure, we can add m and m0 to obtain the total rigid mass m+m0 to simplify the model and reduce the degrees of freedom, and the equivalent heights of the two particles are hc and h0, respectively. The convective mass mc is connected to the wall by an equivalent spring with corresponding stiffness and damping of kc and cc, respectively; the stiffness and damping of the isolation layer are k0 and c0, respectively. The lumped parameter model, which is based on the theory of a homogeneous, isotropic, and elastic half space, is used for the massless foundation, and the foundation effect is simulated using a 2D viscoelastic artificial boundary. The horizontal impedance values of the foundation are kh and ch, and the rocking impedance values of the foundation are kφ and cφ.Figure 2
Sliding base-isolated concrete rectangular liquid-storage structure with moat wall.It is assumed that the liquid-storage structure may collide with both sides of the moat wall during the action of a horizontal earthquake, and the Hertz-damp model is used to simulate the nonlinear pounding problem. The simplified mechanical model of the sliding base-isolated rectangular liquid-storage structure considering the SSI and pounding is shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Simplified model of a sliding isolation rectangular liquid-storage structure that considers the SSI and pounding.The foundation parameters of the simplified model can be obtained by (1), and the other system parameters can be obtained by using [36](10)mc=0.264lhwtanh⁡3.16hwlML,m0=tanh⁡0.866l/hw0.866l/hwML,hc=1-cosh⁡3.16hw/l-13.16hw/lsinh⁡3.16hw/lhw,h0=0.5-0.09375lhw;lhw<1.333,h0=0.375;lhw≥1.333,k0=2πTbm0+m,c0=22πTbξ0m0+m,ωc=gnπltanh⁡nπhwl,kc=ωc2mc,cc=2ξckcmc,where l is length of the liquid-storage structure, which is parallel to the direction of the earthquake action; hw is the liquid height; ML is the total mass of the liquid; Tb is the isolation period; g is the acceleration of gravity; and ωc is circular frequency of liquid sloshing.


### 2.4. Dynamic Equation

The dynamic equation of the system shown in Figure3 can be obtained using the Hamilton principle:(11)δ∫t1t2T-Vdt+∫t1t2δWncdt=0,where T and V are the kinetic energy and potential energy of the system, respectively, and Wnc is the total energy dissipated by damping, friction, and pounding.As seen from Figure3,(12)T=12mcu˙g+u˙f+u˙0+u˙c+hcφ˙2+12m0+mu˙g+u˙f+u˙0+h0φ˙2+12I0φ˙2,V=12kcuc2+12k0u02+12khuf2+12kφφ2,δWnc=-ccu˙cδuc-c0u˙0δu0-chu˙fδuf-cφφ˙δφ-Ffδu0-Fpδu0,where uf and φ are the horizontal displacement and rotation angle of foundation, respectively; I0 is the structural moment of inertia for rotation around the central axis; u˙g, u˙f, u˙0, and u˙c are the velocity of the earthquake, foundation, rigid mass, and liquid convective mass, respectively; φ˙ is the rotation velocity of the foundation; hc and h0 are the heights of the center of gravity that correspond to the liquid convective mass and rigid mass, respectively; uf, u0, and uc are the displacements of the foundation, rigid mass, and liquid convective mass, respectively; φ is the rotational displacement of the foundation; Ff is the friction force, and Ff=-μML+mgsign(u˙0); μ is the friction coefficient of the isolation layer; and sign(u˙0) is a sign function, when u˙0 is greater than zero, the function is equal to −1, when u˙0 is less than zero, it is equal to 1, and when u˙0 is 0, it is equal to zero.Inserting (12) into (11), the dynamic equation of the system can be obtained(13)MU¨+CU˙+KU+Ff+Fp=-M′u¨g,where (14)M=mc0mcmchc0m+m0m+m00mcm+m0mc+m+m0mchcmchc0mchcmchc2+mh02+m0h02+I0;C=cc-cc00-cccc+c00000ch0000cr;K=kc-kc00-kckc+k00000kh0000kr;M′=mcm+m0m+mc+m0mchc;U¨=u¨cu¨0u¨fφ¨;U˙=u˙cu˙0u˙fφ˙;U=ucu0ufφ;Ff=0Ff00;Fp=0Fp00.The liquid sloshing height is a characteristic dynamic response of liquid-storage structures and should be considered in studies of this type of structures; it can be solved by using [37](15)h=0.811·l2·u¨c+u¨gg.The energy balance equation can be obtained by using (13):(16)∫0t0U¨TMU˙dt+∫0t0U˙TCU˙dt+∫0t0UTKU˙dt+∫0t0FfU˙dt+∫0t0FpU˙dt=-∫0t0M′u¨gTU˙dt.The earthquake input energy of the system can be obtained by further equivalent conversion of the right side of (16):(17)EI=∫0t0mcu˙c+m+m0u˙0+m+m0+mcu˙f+mchcφ˙u¨gdt=∫0t0mcu˙g+u˙f+φ˙hc+u˙c+m+m0u˙0+u˙f+u˙g-m+m0+mcu˙gu¨gdt=∫0t0mcu˙g+u˙f+φ˙hc+u˙c+m+m0u˙0+u˙f+u˙gu¨gdt-∫0t0m+m0+mcu˙gu¨g2dt.For the sliding base-isolated structure, the earthquake input energy is mainly dissipated by damping, friction, and pounding. The energiesED, EF, and EP dissipated by damping, friction, and pounding, respectively, can be expressed as(18)ED=∫0t0U˙TCU˙dt,EF=∫0t0FfU˙dt,EP=∫0t0FpU˙dt.


## 2.1. Foundation Model

To consider the foundation effect, the lumped parameter model is used to simulate the elastic foundation and the discrete model, which is based on the theory of a homogeneous, isotropic, and elastic half space. Translation and rotation of the foundation are simulated using the spring element and damping element, respectively, and the corresponding parameters can be calculated by using the following equations [27]:(1)kh=21-νGβxBL,ch=0.576khrhρG,kr=G1-νβφBL2,cr=0.31+βφkrrrρG,where ν is Poisson’s ratio; G is the shear modulus; and βx and βφ are the constants to correct the translation and rotation of the spring, respectively. βx and βφ have strong relationships with the foundation length-width ratio, and according to the existing literature [27], the approximate values of βx and βφ are equal to 1, L and B are the foundation length and width, respectively, and L and B are parallel and perpendicular to the direction of earthquake, respectively. ρ is soil density, and rh and rr are equivalent radii of the foundation that correspond to translation and rotation, respectively. The maximum shear modulus Gmax is only suitable when the soil is in the low strain condition, and it can be expressed as a function of the shear wave velocity Vs and soil density ρ(2)Gmax=ρVs2.When the soil is in the inelastic stage, the shear modulusG is significantly reduced. The shear modulus G will be changed when the shear strain γ is beyond the range of the elastic state because of a dynamic effect. To realistically simulate the ground effect, the shear modulus G needs to be reduced by introducing the shear modulus reduction curve (G/Gmax-1) [27], and the shear strain γ can be expressed as(3)γ=V42π0.534r26Vs2ρ0.061+0.18r8+0.3026+M42π0.513.840rr32r26Vs2ρ,where V is the horizontal shear force and M is the overturning moment.


## 2.2. Pounding Calculation Model

Sliding base-isolated liquid-storage structures will suffer large amounts of slippage under the action of some strong earthquakes. Thus, the pounding dynamic responses caused by pounding between the liquid-storage structure and moat wall are important subjects to study. The contact element method is an effective technique to simulate pounding problems; common pounding models include the linear model, Kelvin model, Hertz model, and Hertz-damp model [24, 28–31]. Muthumar and Desroches [29] concluded that, for the same parameters, the differences in the displacements and acceleration calculated by the different models are within 12%. Chau et al. [24] and Jankowski [31] systematically compared the numerical and experimental results of the pounding models for different materials and showed that both the linear and nonlinear pounding models could satisfy the precision requirements for engineering.Previous experimental studies have shown that the energy loss during the pounding process is mainly concentrated when the two objects are approaching each other but is relatively small during the recovery phase [32]. The modified Hertz model (Hertz-damp model), which is composed of nonlinear springs and a nonlinear damping element (Figure 1), is chosen to simulate the pounding. The model does not consider the energy loss in the pounding recovery phase and assumes that all of the energy loss caused by pounding occurs as the two objects approach each other [31]. The contact forces during the pounding and recovery phases can be expressed as (4) and (5), respectively.Figure 1
Hertz-damp pounding model.The pounding occurs on the left:(4)Fp=-kimp-ub-gp3/2-cimpu˙b;-ub-gp>0,u˙b<0Fp=-kimp-ub-gp3/2;-ub-gp>0,u˙b>0Fp=0;-ub-gp≤0.The pounding occurs on the right:(5)Fp=kimpub-gp3/2+cimpu˙b;ub-gp>0,u˙b>0Fp=kimpub-gp3/2;ub-gp>0,u˙b<0Fp=0;ub-gp≤0,where ub is the horizontal displacement of the liquid-storage structure; gp is the initial gap between the structure and surrounding moat wall or restraining wall; u˙b is the structural velocity; kimp is the impact stiffness; and cimp is the pounding damping. The parameters kimp and cimp can be obtained from (6)–(9) [29]:(6)kimp=43π1λ1+λ2R1R2R1+R2λi=1-νi2πEii=1,2Ri=3mi4πρi3i=1,2,where λ1 and λ2 are the material parameters; νi and Ei are Poisson’s ratio and elastic modulus of the pounding body, respectively; Ri is the equivalent radius of the pounding body; and mi and ρi are the mass and density of the pounding body, respectively.The pounding occurs on the left:(7)cimp=2ξimpkimp-ub-gpmc+mi+m0+m.The pounding occurs on the right:(8)cimp=2ξimpkimpub-gpmc+mi+m0+m,where ξimp is the impact damping ratio, which can be expressed as a function of the coefficient of restitution (COR) [33](9)ξimp=9521-COR2CORCOR9π-16+16.After two objects collide with each other, the reasonable COR greatly influences the rationality of the model. For most pounding problems of engineering structures, the range of CORs is 0.5–0.75 [31].


## 2.3. Simplified Model of a Sliding Isolation Rectangular Liquid-Storage Structure considering the SSI and Pounding

When the sliding base-isolated liquid-storage structure with moat wall (Figure2) experiences a large earthquake and its magnitude of slippage exceeds the initial gap, the structure will collide with the moat wall. To study the influence of pounding on the dynamic responses of the liquid-storage structure, a reasonable calculation model should be developed. Currently, the spring-mass model is generally used as a simplification of the liquid-storage structure, and the structural dynamic responses are generally calculated accurately [34]. In this paper, the liquid is represented using a two-particle model [35]. The liquid is divided into 2 parts: rigid mass m0 and convective mass mc. In addition, the mass of the reinforced concrete structure m is large, so m should also be considered in the dynamic analysis. Because of the assumption that m0 moves with the liquid-storage structure, we can add m and m0 to obtain the total rigid mass m+m0 to simplify the model and reduce the degrees of freedom, and the equivalent heights of the two particles are hc and h0, respectively. The convective mass mc is connected to the wall by an equivalent spring with corresponding stiffness and damping of kc and cc, respectively; the stiffness and damping of the isolation layer are k0 and c0, respectively. The lumped parameter model, which is based on the theory of a homogeneous, isotropic, and elastic half space, is used for the massless foundation, and the foundation effect is simulated using a 2D viscoelastic artificial boundary. The horizontal impedance values of the foundation are kh and ch, and the rocking impedance values of the foundation are kφ and cφ.Figure 2
Sliding base-isolated concrete rectangular liquid-storage structure with moat wall.It is assumed that the liquid-storage structure may collide with both sides of the moat wall during the action of a horizontal earthquake, and the Hertz-damp model is used to simulate the nonlinear pounding problem. The simplified mechanical model of the sliding base-isolated rectangular liquid-storage structure considering the SSI and pounding is shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Simplified model of a sliding isolation rectangular liquid-storage structure that considers the SSI and pounding.The foundation parameters of the simplified model can be obtained by (1), and the other system parameters can be obtained by using [36](10)mc=0.264lhwtanh⁡3.16hwlML,m0=tanh⁡0.866l/hw0.866l/hwML,hc=1-cosh⁡3.16hw/l-13.16hw/lsinh⁡3.16hw/lhw,h0=0.5-0.09375lhw;lhw<1.333,h0=0.375;lhw≥1.333,k0=2πTbm0+m,c0=22πTbξ0m0+m,ωc=gnπltanh⁡nπhwl,kc=ωc2mc,cc=2ξckcmc,where l is length of the liquid-storage structure, which is parallel to the direction of the earthquake action; hw is the liquid height; ML is the total mass of the liquid; Tb is the isolation period; g is the acceleration of gravity; and ωc is circular frequency of liquid sloshing.


## 2.4. Dynamic Equation

The dynamic equation of the system shown in Figure3 can be obtained using the Hamilton principle:(11)δ∫t1t2T-Vdt+∫t1t2δWncdt=0,where T and V are the kinetic energy and potential energy of the system, respectively, and Wnc is the total energy dissipated by damping, friction, and pounding.As seen from Figure3,(12)T=12mcu˙g+u˙f+u˙0+u˙c+hcφ˙2+12m0+mu˙g+u˙f+u˙0+h0φ˙2+12I0φ˙2,V=12kcuc2+12k0u02+12khuf2+12kφφ2,δWnc=-ccu˙cδuc-c0u˙0δu0-chu˙fδuf-cφφ˙δφ-Ffδu0-Fpδu0,where uf and φ are the horizontal displacement and rotation angle of foundation, respectively; I0 is the structural moment of inertia for rotation around the central axis; u˙g, u˙f, u˙0, and u˙c are the velocity of the earthquake, foundation, rigid mass, and liquid convective mass, respectively; φ˙ is the rotation velocity of the foundation; hc and h0 are the heights of the center of gravity that correspond to the liquid convective mass and rigid mass, respectively; uf, u0, and uc are the displacements of the foundation, rigid mass, and liquid convective mass, respectively; φ is the rotational displacement of the foundation; Ff is the friction force, and Ff=-μML+mgsign(u˙0); μ is the friction coefficient of the isolation layer; and sign(u˙0) is a sign function, when u˙0 is greater than zero, the function is equal to −1, when u˙0 is less than zero, it is equal to 1, and when u˙0 is 0, it is equal to zero.Inserting (12) into (11), the dynamic equation of the system can be obtained(13)MU¨+CU˙+KU+Ff+Fp=-M′u¨g,where (14)M=mc0mcmchc0m+m0m+m00mcm+m0mc+m+m0mchcmchc0mchcmchc2+mh02+m0h02+I0;C=cc-cc00-cccc+c00000ch0000cr;K=kc-kc00-kckc+k00000kh0000kr;M′=mcm+m0m+mc+m0mchc;U¨=u¨cu¨0u¨fφ¨;U˙=u˙cu˙0u˙fφ˙;U=ucu0ufφ;Ff=0Ff00;Fp=0Fp00.The liquid sloshing height is a characteristic dynamic response of liquid-storage structures and should be considered in studies of this type of structures; it can be solved by using [37](15)h=0.811·l2·u¨c+u¨gg.The energy balance equation can be obtained by using (13):(16)∫0t0U¨TMU˙dt+∫0t0U˙TCU˙dt+∫0t0UTKU˙dt+∫0t0FfU˙dt+∫0t0FpU˙dt=-∫0t0M′u¨gTU˙dt.The earthquake input energy of the system can be obtained by further equivalent conversion of the right side of (16):(17)EI=∫0t0mcu˙c+m+m0u˙0+m+m0+mcu˙f+mchcφ˙u¨gdt=∫0t0mcu˙g+u˙f+φ˙hc+u˙c+m+m0u˙0+u˙f+u˙g-m+m0+mcu˙gu¨gdt=∫0t0mcu˙g+u˙f+φ˙hc+u˙c+m+m0u˙0+u˙f+u˙gu¨gdt-∫0t0m+m0+mcu˙gu¨g2dt.For the sliding base-isolated structure, the earthquake input energy is mainly dissipated by damping, friction, and pounding. The energiesED, EF, and EP dissipated by damping, friction, and pounding, respectively, can be expressed as(18)ED=∫0t0U˙TCU˙dt,EF=∫0t0FfU˙dt,EP=∫0t0FpU˙dt.


## 3. Pounding Dynamic Responses

### 3.1. Calculation Parameters of the System

The size of the rectangular liquid-storage structure is 6 m × 6 m × 4.8 m, the liquid height is 3.6 m, the wall thickness is 0.2 m, and the moat wall thickness is 0.2 m. The damping ratioξ0 of the structure and the liquid rigid mass is 0.05. The damping ratio ξc corresponding to the liquid convection mass is 0.005. The impact stiffness kp is 2.75 × 109 N/m. The impact damping ξimp is 0.35; the COR is 0.65 [38].A large number of studies show that a soft soil causes more significant changes to the structural dynamic responses. To study the influence of the foundation effect on the dynamic responses of the sliding base-isolated liquid-storage structure, a soft soil site is assumed to be the foundation based on the Uniform Building Code (UBC2007). The material parameters of this soft soil are shown in Table1. The dynamic shear modulus G used to consider the foundation effect is assumed to be 60% of the maximum shear modulus Gmax. The equivalent radii rh and rr corresponding to foundation translation and rotation are 4 m [39], and L and B of the foundation are 66 m.Table 1
Parameters of the foundation.
Soil profile type Shear wave velocityVs (m/s) Soil densityρ (kg/m3) Poisson’s ratioν Modulus of elasticityE (MPa) Damping ratioξ (%) Soft soil 150 1900 0.30 6.12 5


### 3.2. Seismic Waves

The near-field pulse-like Chi-Chi earthquake and far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake are chosen to conduct time history analyses. The seismic waves are from the PEER strong earthquake observation database (http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/), and information about the seismic waves is shown in Table 2. To study the dynamic responses of the sliding base-isolated liquid-storage structure, the peak ground acceleration (PGA) of the two seismic waves is adjusted to 1.0 g, and the adjusted acceleration time history curves are shown in Figure 4.Table 2
Seismic waves.
Earthquake Station PGA (g) PGV (cm/s) PGD (m) Pulse durationTp (s) Chi-Chi TCU036 0.13381 11.50826 0.02336 5.341 Imperial Valley-06 Westmorland Fire Sta 0.07605 4.24472 0.00838 —Figure 4
Seismic waves.
(a)
Chi-Chi (b)
Imperial Valley-06


### 3.3. Effect of the SSI on the Dynamic Responses of a Sliding Isolation Liquid-Storage Structure

The initial gap is 0.10 m, the friction coefficient is 0.06, and the other parameters are mentioned previously. To study the influences of the SSI on the dynamic responses of a liquid-storage structure, the structural dynamic responses are calculated with and without the SSI. The liquid sloshing height, structural accelerationu¨0, impact force, and structural displacement u0 for the two conditions are shown in Figure 5.Figure 5
Effect of SSI on structural dynamic responses considering pounding.
(a)
Liquid sloshing height (b)
Structural acceleration (c)
Impact force (d)
Structural displacementAs shown in Figure5, the impact force and structural acceleration show the pulse phenomenon at the moment of pounding. The liquid sloshing height increases when the SSI is considered, the probable reason being that the SSI effect extends the period of the isolation system; namely, the periods of the system corresponding to considering the SSI and not considering the SSI are 2.0 s and 2.3 s; besides, the liquid sloshing period (2.726 s) is long. Because the difference of structure period and liquid sloshing period becomes small, the liquid sloshing height is increased. The structural acceleration and impact force will be reduced after considering the SSI because the foundation plays the role of a buffer at the moment of pounding. Under the action of strong near-field Chi-Chi and far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake, the structural slippage will exceed the initial gap but the sliding of the structure is limited because of the action of the surrounding moat wall, so the influence of the SSI effect on the maximum displacement response of the structure is relatively small. In addition to the slippage, the structural dynamic response induced by the near-field earthquake is much larger than the response due to the far-field earthquake. After considering the SSI, the maximum liquid sloshing heights under the action of near-field and far-field earthquakes are 0.822 m and 0.266 m, respectively, the maximum structural acceleration values are 49.36 m/s2 and 17.59 m/s2, respectively, and the maximum impact forces are 7.02 × 106 N and 1.70 × 106 N, respectively. From this analysis, we can conclude that near-field pulse-like Chi-Chi earthquake causes more serious damage to a sliding base-isolated structure than far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake and that the former will greatly influence the function of the sliding isolation structure.


### 3.4. Effect of the SSI on the Energy Responses of a Liquid-Storage Structure

A remarkable characteristic of sliding isolation is that the friction effect will consume a large amount of energy when the structure moves. In addition, the damping of the system will dissipate a portion of the energy, and the pounding effect can dissipate another portion of the energy when pounding occurs. In addition, in order to validate the motion equations derived from Hamilton’s principle, the input energy of the earthquake and the total dissipated energy considering the SSI effect are shown in Figure6. For the two types of earthquake actions, the friction energy dissipation EF, the pounding energy dissipation EP, and the damping energy dissipation ED that consider the SSI or not are shown in Figure 7.Figure 6
Comparison of input energy and total dissipated energy.Figure 7
Effects of SSI on energy dissipation.
(a)
Friction energy dissipationEF (b)
Pounding energy dissipationEP (c)
Damping energy dissipationEDAs seen from Figure6, under the action of Chi-Chi and Imperial Valley-06 earthquakes, the difference of input energy curve and total dissipated energy curve is small when the SSI effect is considered, so the rationality of the corresponding equations proposed in this paper is verified to a certain degree. Besides, it is shown that the earthquake input energy is mainly dissipated by damping, friction, and pounding.As seen in Figure7, the friction energy dissipation and the pounding energy dissipation are decreased and the damping energy dissipation is increased when the SSI are considered. EF and ED increase gradually as the time increases, and finally, they tend to be stable. EP only occurs at every pounding moment. For the no pounding state, EP does not increase, and the corresponding curve is linear, so EP has a ladder-type growth phenomenon with time. The friction energy dissipation of the sliding isolation structure is much larger than the damping energy dissipation. Therefore, a reasonable selection of the friction coefficient of the sliding isolation layer has an important influence on the design of the sliding isolation structure.By comparing the corresponding energy responses for the actions of the near-field pulse-like Chi-Chi earthquake and far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake, we found thatEF, EP, and ED corresponding to the Chi-Chi wave are much larger than those of the Imperial Valley-06 wave. To ensure that a sliding base-isolated liquid-storage structure that experiences strong earthquakes can continue to play its important role, the design requirements of each part of the structure should be higher for near-field pulse-like Chi-Chi earthquake because each part of the system needs to dissipate more seismic energy.


## 3.1. Calculation Parameters of the System

The size of the rectangular liquid-storage structure is 6 m × 6 m × 4.8 m, the liquid height is 3.6 m, the wall thickness is 0.2 m, and the moat wall thickness is 0.2 m. The damping ratioξ0 of the structure and the liquid rigid mass is 0.05. The damping ratio ξc corresponding to the liquid convection mass is 0.005. The impact stiffness kp is 2.75 × 109 N/m. The impact damping ξimp is 0.35; the COR is 0.65 [38].A large number of studies show that a soft soil causes more significant changes to the structural dynamic responses. To study the influence of the foundation effect on the dynamic responses of the sliding base-isolated liquid-storage structure, a soft soil site is assumed to be the foundation based on the Uniform Building Code (UBC2007). The material parameters of this soft soil are shown in Table1. The dynamic shear modulus G used to consider the foundation effect is assumed to be 60% of the maximum shear modulus Gmax. The equivalent radii rh and rr corresponding to foundation translation and rotation are 4 m [39], and L and B of the foundation are 66 m.Table 1
Parameters of the foundation.
Soil profile type Shear wave velocityVs (m/s) Soil densityρ (kg/m3) Poisson’s ratioν Modulus of elasticityE (MPa) Damping ratioξ (%) Soft soil 150 1900 0.30 6.12 5


## 3.2. Seismic Waves

The near-field pulse-like Chi-Chi earthquake and far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake are chosen to conduct time history analyses. The seismic waves are from the PEER strong earthquake observation database (http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/), and information about the seismic waves is shown in Table 2. To study the dynamic responses of the sliding base-isolated liquid-storage structure, the peak ground acceleration (PGA) of the two seismic waves is adjusted to 1.0 g, and the adjusted acceleration time history curves are shown in Figure 4.Table 2
Seismic waves.
Earthquake Station PGA (g) PGV (cm/s) PGD (m) Pulse durationTp (s) Chi-Chi TCU036 0.13381 11.50826 0.02336 5.341 Imperial Valley-06 Westmorland Fire Sta 0.07605 4.24472 0.00838 —Figure 4
Seismic waves.
(a)
Chi-Chi (b)
Imperial Valley-06


## 3.3. Effect of the SSI on the Dynamic Responses of a Sliding Isolation Liquid-Storage Structure

The initial gap is 0.10 m, the friction coefficient is 0.06, and the other parameters are mentioned previously. To study the influences of the SSI on the dynamic responses of a liquid-storage structure, the structural dynamic responses are calculated with and without the SSI. The liquid sloshing height, structural accelerationu¨0, impact force, and structural displacement u0 for the two conditions are shown in Figure 5.Figure 5
Effect of SSI on structural dynamic responses considering pounding.
(a)
Liquid sloshing height (b)
Structural acceleration (c)
Impact force (d)
Structural displacementAs shown in Figure5, the impact force and structural acceleration show the pulse phenomenon at the moment of pounding. The liquid sloshing height increases when the SSI is considered, the probable reason being that the SSI effect extends the period of the isolation system; namely, the periods of the system corresponding to considering the SSI and not considering the SSI are 2.0 s and 2.3 s; besides, the liquid sloshing period (2.726 s) is long. Because the difference of structure period and liquid sloshing period becomes small, the liquid sloshing height is increased. The structural acceleration and impact force will be reduced after considering the SSI because the foundation plays the role of a buffer at the moment of pounding. Under the action of strong near-field Chi-Chi and far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake, the structural slippage will exceed the initial gap but the sliding of the structure is limited because of the action of the surrounding moat wall, so the influence of the SSI effect on the maximum displacement response of the structure is relatively small. In addition to the slippage, the structural dynamic response induced by the near-field earthquake is much larger than the response due to the far-field earthquake. After considering the SSI, the maximum liquid sloshing heights under the action of near-field and far-field earthquakes are 0.822 m and 0.266 m, respectively, the maximum structural acceleration values are 49.36 m/s2 and 17.59 m/s2, respectively, and the maximum impact forces are 7.02 × 106 N and 1.70 × 106 N, respectively. From this analysis, we can conclude that near-field pulse-like Chi-Chi earthquake causes more serious damage to a sliding base-isolated structure than far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake and that the former will greatly influence the function of the sliding isolation structure.


## 3.4. Effect of the SSI on the Energy Responses of a Liquid-Storage Structure

A remarkable characteristic of sliding isolation is that the friction effect will consume a large amount of energy when the structure moves. In addition, the damping of the system will dissipate a portion of the energy, and the pounding effect can dissipate another portion of the energy when pounding occurs. In addition, in order to validate the motion equations derived from Hamilton’s principle, the input energy of the earthquake and the total dissipated energy considering the SSI effect are shown in Figure6. For the two types of earthquake actions, the friction energy dissipation EF, the pounding energy dissipation EP, and the damping energy dissipation ED that consider the SSI or not are shown in Figure 7.Figure 6
Comparison of input energy and total dissipated energy.Figure 7
Effects of SSI on energy dissipation.
(a)
Friction energy dissipationEF (b)
Pounding energy dissipationEP (c)
Damping energy dissipationEDAs seen from Figure6, under the action of Chi-Chi and Imperial Valley-06 earthquakes, the difference of input energy curve and total dissipated energy curve is small when the SSI effect is considered, so the rationality of the corresponding equations proposed in this paper is verified to a certain degree. Besides, it is shown that the earthquake input energy is mainly dissipated by damping, friction, and pounding.As seen in Figure7, the friction energy dissipation and the pounding energy dissipation are decreased and the damping energy dissipation is increased when the SSI are considered. EF and ED increase gradually as the time increases, and finally, they tend to be stable. EP only occurs at every pounding moment. For the no pounding state, EP does not increase, and the corresponding curve is linear, so EP has a ladder-type growth phenomenon with time. The friction energy dissipation of the sliding isolation structure is much larger than the damping energy dissipation. Therefore, a reasonable selection of the friction coefficient of the sliding isolation layer has an important influence on the design of the sliding isolation structure.By comparing the corresponding energy responses for the actions of the near-field pulse-like Chi-Chi earthquake and far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake, we found thatEF, EP, and ED corresponding to the Chi-Chi wave are much larger than those of the Imperial Valley-06 wave. To ensure that a sliding base-isolated liquid-storage structure that experiences strong earthquakes can continue to play its important role, the design requirements of each part of the structure should be higher for near-field pulse-like Chi-Chi earthquake because each part of the system needs to dissipate more seismic energy.


## 4. Peak Response Analysis

### 4.1. Effect of the Initial Gap on Peak Responses

g p is one of the important parameters in the design of base-isolated structures, and the gap size determines the occurrence of pounding and the impact of pounding on the structural dynamic responses. To study the influence of gp on the dynamic responses while considering the SSI of a sliding isolation rectangular liquid-storage structure, different values of gp, liquid sloshing height, structural acceleration, and impact force corresponding to different gp are studied. The calculated results are shown in Figure 8.Figure 8
Pounding dynamic responses corresponding to different gap sizes.
(a)
Liquid sloshing height (b)
Structural acceleration (c)
Impact forceAs shown in Figure8, gp has little effect on the liquid sloshing height after considering the SSI. The maximum liquid sloshing height caused by near-field Chi-Chi earthquake is approximately 2-3 times the height of the far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake for a given value of gp. In addition to some individual gp, the response of the impact force and structural acceleration caused by the near-field Chi-Chi earthquake is much larger than the far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake overall, and the impact force and structural acceleration first increase and then decrease as gp increases. For the Chi-Chi and Imperial Valley-06 waves, the structural acceleration and impact forces are maximum values when gp is 0.04 m and 0.18 m, respectively. Therefore, in the design of a sliding isolation structure, there is critical gp that will cause the maximum dynamic responses when the pounding occurs, which makes the structure more susceptible to damage and seriously affects the effectiveness of the isolation structure. Moreover, gp corresponding to near-field Chi-Chi earthquake and far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake that have more adverse effects on the structure is different. In the design of this type of structure, to select a reasonable gap to minimize the adverse effect of pounding on the system, the site conditions should be seriously considered.


### 4.2. Effect of the Friction Coefficient on the Peak Responses

Friction coefficientμ is an important design parameter of a sliding isolation structure because it directly determines the shock absorption effect of this type of structure. For the case that considers the foundation effect, studying the influence of μ on the dynamic responses is helpful to understand the pounding of the sliding isolation structure and to provide a theoretical basis for a rational design of a sliding isolation structure. After the SSI is considered, the liquid sloshing height, structural acceleration, and impact force corresponding to different friction coefficients are shown in Figure 9.Figure 9
Pounding dynamic responses corresponding to different friction coefficients.
(a)
Liquid sloshing height (b)
Structural acceleration (c)
Impact forceAs seen in Figure9, the friction coefficient has little effect on the liquid sloshing wave height for the case of pounding that considers the SSI. In addition to the friction coefficients of 0.08 and 0.10, the impact force and structural acceleration decrease as the friction coefficient increases overall. In comparison, based on fitted curve, we obtained the influence of the friction coefficient on the dynamic response of the structure for the near-field Chi-Chi earthquake is less than the far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake. However, under different friction coefficients, the dynamic responses of the system for the near-field Chi-Chi earthquake are significantly greater than the far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake. The larger coefficient of friction can reduce the probability of pounding and the structural dynamic responses in the case of pounding. However, it should be noted that the effect of this type of base-isolated structure is achieved by sliding. When the friction coefficient is too large, the structure will not slip under some smaller earthquakes, which is similar to the structure with a fixed support, so that the damping effect of the sliding isolation structure will be lost. Therefore, after comprehensive consideration, the friction coefficient should be an intermediate value to better balance the needs of all parties.


### 4.3. Correlation of the Friction Coefficient and Initial Gap on the Maximum Horizontal Displacement of the Structure

Slippage is an important characteristic dynamic response of a sliding isolation structure. Although the amount of slippage has little effect on the liquid-storage structure in theory, when taking into account some practical problems, especially liquid-storage structures in the petroleum chemical industry and nuclear industry, once the slippage exceeds a critical limit, the accessory pipelines will be damaged, and liquid may leak out. This result is as serious as failure of the structure itself. If we ignore the problem, the loss of a sliding isolation structure will outweigh the gain. To have a more comprehensive understanding of the slippage of the sliding isolation structure, the correlation effect of the friction coefficient and initial gap on the maximum horizontal displacement of a liquid-storage structure is studied considering the SSI. The calculated results are shown in Figure10.Figure 10
Correlation effects of the friction coefficient and initial gap on the maximum horizontal displacement of the structure.
(a)
Chi-Chi earthquake (b)
Imperial Valley-06 earthquakeAs seen in Figure10, the maximum horizontal displacement of the liquid-storage structure decreases as the friction coefficient increases and increases as the initial gap increases overall. Under the near-field Chi-Chi earthquake, when the initial gap gp is small (0.10 m and 0.12 m), the friction coefficient has little effect on the maximum slippage of the liquid-storage structure because the maximum horizontal displacement of the liquid-storage structure with different friction coefficients can all reach gp. As gp increases, the effect of the friction coefficient on the slippage becomes obvious. In particular, when gp is greater than or equal to 0.20, as the friction coefficient increases, the decreasing trend of slippage is even more significant. When the friction coefficient is large, the slippage is small, so gp has little effect on the slippage. For the far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake, when the friction coefficient is small (such as 0.08 or 0.10), the slippage increases with increase of gp. When the friction coefficient is greater than or equal to 0.12, the structure will not collide with the moat wall, so gp has no effect on the slippage.Based on the calculated results of Figure10, if there is no surrounding moat wall, the maximum slippage will be greater than 0.20 m for the near-field Chi-Chi earthquake and the maximum slippage will be smaller than 0.12 m for the far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake. Therefore, the amount of slippage for the structure experiencing near-field Chi-Chi earthquake is significantly greater than the far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake. To avoid damage caused by large amounts of slippage to accessory pipelines of a sliding liquid-storage structure in the petroleum chemical industry, a study of limiting measures for near-field pulse-like earthquakes should receive great attention. Meanwhile, for near-field pulse-like Chi-Chi earthquake, it is more necessary to study mitigation measures to reduce the pounding dynamic responses.


## 4.1. Effect of the Initial Gap on Peak Responses

g p is one of the important parameters in the design of base-isolated structures, and the gap size determines the occurrence of pounding and the impact of pounding on the structural dynamic responses. To study the influence of gp on the dynamic responses while considering the SSI of a sliding isolation rectangular liquid-storage structure, different values of gp, liquid sloshing height, structural acceleration, and impact force corresponding to different gp are studied. The calculated results are shown in Figure 8.Figure 8
Pounding dynamic responses corresponding to different gap sizes.
(a)
Liquid sloshing height (b)
Structural acceleration (c)
Impact forceAs shown in Figure8, gp has little effect on the liquid sloshing height after considering the SSI. The maximum liquid sloshing height caused by near-field Chi-Chi earthquake is approximately 2-3 times the height of the far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake for a given value of gp. In addition to some individual gp, the response of the impact force and structural acceleration caused by the near-field Chi-Chi earthquake is much larger than the far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake overall, and the impact force and structural acceleration first increase and then decrease as gp increases. For the Chi-Chi and Imperial Valley-06 waves, the structural acceleration and impact forces are maximum values when gp is 0.04 m and 0.18 m, respectively. Therefore, in the design of a sliding isolation structure, there is critical gp that will cause the maximum dynamic responses when the pounding occurs, which makes the structure more susceptible to damage and seriously affects the effectiveness of the isolation structure. Moreover, gp corresponding to near-field Chi-Chi earthquake and far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake that have more adverse effects on the structure is different. In the design of this type of structure, to select a reasonable gap to minimize the adverse effect of pounding on the system, the site conditions should be seriously considered.


## 4.2. Effect of the Friction Coefficient on the Peak Responses

Friction coefficientμ is an important design parameter of a sliding isolation structure because it directly determines the shock absorption effect of this type of structure. For the case that considers the foundation effect, studying the influence of μ on the dynamic responses is helpful to understand the pounding of the sliding isolation structure and to provide a theoretical basis for a rational design of a sliding isolation structure. After the SSI is considered, the liquid sloshing height, structural acceleration, and impact force corresponding to different friction coefficients are shown in Figure 9.Figure 9
Pounding dynamic responses corresponding to different friction coefficients.
(a)
Liquid sloshing height (b)
Structural acceleration (c)
Impact forceAs seen in Figure9, the friction coefficient has little effect on the liquid sloshing wave height for the case of pounding that considers the SSI. In addition to the friction coefficients of 0.08 and 0.10, the impact force and structural acceleration decrease as the friction coefficient increases overall. In comparison, based on fitted curve, we obtained the influence of the friction coefficient on the dynamic response of the structure for the near-field Chi-Chi earthquake is less than the far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake. However, under different friction coefficients, the dynamic responses of the system for the near-field Chi-Chi earthquake are significantly greater than the far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake. The larger coefficient of friction can reduce the probability of pounding and the structural dynamic responses in the case of pounding. However, it should be noted that the effect of this type of base-isolated structure is achieved by sliding. When the friction coefficient is too large, the structure will not slip under some smaller earthquakes, which is similar to the structure with a fixed support, so that the damping effect of the sliding isolation structure will be lost. Therefore, after comprehensive consideration, the friction coefficient should be an intermediate value to better balance the needs of all parties.


## 4.3. Correlation of the Friction Coefficient and Initial Gap on the Maximum Horizontal Displacement of the Structure

Slippage is an important characteristic dynamic response of a sliding isolation structure. Although the amount of slippage has little effect on the liquid-storage structure in theory, when taking into account some practical problems, especially liquid-storage structures in the petroleum chemical industry and nuclear industry, once the slippage exceeds a critical limit, the accessory pipelines will be damaged, and liquid may leak out. This result is as serious as failure of the structure itself. If we ignore the problem, the loss of a sliding isolation structure will outweigh the gain. To have a more comprehensive understanding of the slippage of the sliding isolation structure, the correlation effect of the friction coefficient and initial gap on the maximum horizontal displacement of a liquid-storage structure is studied considering the SSI. The calculated results are shown in Figure10.Figure 10
Correlation effects of the friction coefficient and initial gap on the maximum horizontal displacement of the structure.
(a)
Chi-Chi earthquake (b)
Imperial Valley-06 earthquakeAs seen in Figure10, the maximum horizontal displacement of the liquid-storage structure decreases as the friction coefficient increases and increases as the initial gap increases overall. Under the near-field Chi-Chi earthquake, when the initial gap gp is small (0.10 m and 0.12 m), the friction coefficient has little effect on the maximum slippage of the liquid-storage structure because the maximum horizontal displacement of the liquid-storage structure with different friction coefficients can all reach gp. As gp increases, the effect of the friction coefficient on the slippage becomes obvious. In particular, when gp is greater than or equal to 0.20, as the friction coefficient increases, the decreasing trend of slippage is even more significant. When the friction coefficient is large, the slippage is small, so gp has little effect on the slippage. For the far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake, when the friction coefficient is small (such as 0.08 or 0.10), the slippage increases with increase of gp. When the friction coefficient is greater than or equal to 0.12, the structure will not collide with the moat wall, so gp has no effect on the slippage.Based on the calculated results of Figure10, if there is no surrounding moat wall, the maximum slippage will be greater than 0.20 m for the near-field Chi-Chi earthquake and the maximum slippage will be smaller than 0.12 m for the far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake. Therefore, the amount of slippage for the structure experiencing near-field Chi-Chi earthquake is significantly greater than the far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake. To avoid damage caused by large amounts of slippage to accessory pipelines of a sliding liquid-storage structure in the petroleum chemical industry, a study of limiting measures for near-field pulse-like earthquakes should receive great attention. Meanwhile, for near-field pulse-like Chi-Chi earthquake, it is more necessary to study mitigation measures to reduce the pounding dynamic responses.


## 5. Conclusions

The SSI and the pounding possibility between a sliding isolation liquid-storage structure and its moat wall are considered in this paper. A simplified mechanical model of the sliding base-isolated liquid-storage structure is established, and the pounding dynamic responses of the system under the action near-field Chi-Chi earthquake and far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake are studied. The effects of the SSI, initial gap, and friction coefficient on the dynamic responses of a liquid-storage structure are discussed. The main conclusions are as follows:(1)
The liquid sloshing height of a sliding isolation liquid-storage structure increases when the SSI is considered because the SSI increases the period of the isolation structure and the difference between the isolation period and liquid sloshing period becomes small. When the liquid-storage structure collides with the moat wall, the structural dynamic responses due to a pulse phenomenon will appear, but the structural acceleration and impact force are reduced because of the buffer effect of the foundation.(2)
The friction energy dissipation and pounding energy dissipation of the system are reduced when the SSI is considered. The friction energy dissipation and damping energy dissipation gradually increase as the time increases, whereas the pounding energy dissipation is only affected by each pounding and shows a ladder-type growth phenomenon as the time increases. The friction energy dissipation, pounding energy dissipation, and damping energy dissipation for near-field pulse-like Chi-Chi earthquake are far greater than far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake. To ensure that the structure continues to work properly under some strong earthquakes, the near-field pulse-like Chi-Chi earthquake affects the design process more for each part of the structure.(3)
After considering the SSI, the dynamic responses of a sliding isolation liquid-storage structure with different initial gaps for near-field Chi-Chi earthquake are generally larger than far-field Imperial Valley-06 earthquake.gp has little effect on the liquid sloshing height, but the structural acceleration and impact force first increase and then decrease as gp increases. Therefore, when designing a sliding isolation structure, it should be noted that a certain value of gp will result in the maximum pounding dynamic responses and the effectiveness of the isolation structure will be seriously affected.(4)
Increasing the friction coefficient can reduce the pounding dynamic responses of the structure to a certain extent. However, when the friction coefficient is large, this type of isolation structure will not slide, so it will lose the designed shock absorption during some earthquakes. Therefore, the selection of the friction coefficient of a sliding isolation structure should be considered comprehensively and an intermediate value for the friction coefficient is ideal.(5)
When the friction coefficient is small, the initial gap greatly affects the slippage of a sliding isolation liquid-storage structure. When the initial gap is large, the friction coefficient greatly affects the slippage of the sliding isolation liquid-storage structure.



---

*Source: 8594051-2017-01-31.xml*