# Selective Adsorption and Photocatalytic Degradation of Dyes Using Polyoxometalate Hybrid Supported on Magnetic Activated Carbon Nanoparticles under Sunlight, Visible, and UV Irradiation

Authors: Mehdi Taghdiri
Journal: International Journal of Photoenergy
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

In this study, magnetic activated carbon (MAC) nanoparticles were coated with an organic hybrid of silicotungstic acid that makes MAC suitable for adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of dyes. The prepared composite was characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, powder X-ray diffraction, thermal analyses, scanning electron microscopy, vibrating sample magnetometer, and N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms. Dye adsorption and photocatalytic properties of composite were examined by studying the decolorization of model dyes methylene blue (MB), methyl orange (MO), rhodamine B (RhB), and their mixture solutions. The results show that the composite can selectively adsorb MB molecules from binary mixtures of MB/MO or MB/RhB, and its adsorption capacity is enhanced as compared with the MAC. The composite is also, unlike MAC, a good photocatalyst in the degradation of dyes under sunlight, visible, and UV irradiation and can be separated by magnet, recovered and reused. Removal is via combination of adsorption and then photocatalytic degradation through direct oxidation by composite or indirect oxidation by •OH radicals. While the sunlight is not able to degrade alone MO and RhB solution in the presence of composite, it degrades the MO and RhB mixed with MB solution.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Synthetic dyes have been widely used in many technological processes such as paints and textiles, as an additive in plastic, paper, leather, cosmetics and rubber industries, and so on [1]. The discharge of wastewater of these industries to the environment affects both living organisms of aquatic ecosystems and human health due to toxicity and carcinogenicity [2]. Consequently, treatment of dye-contaminated wastewaters with decontamination processes is necessary before their discharge. Adsorption of dyes on inexpensive and efficient solid supports especially on activated carbon (AC) and AC composites is one of the simplest and most economical methods for removing dyes from wastewater [3–19]; however, the disposal of residues is still a problem. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are widely accepted as an efficient method for dye-contaminated wastewater due to complete degradation of organics into carbon dioxide and water. Among various AOPs, heterogeneous photocatalysis has attracted significant attention because of its low-cost, environmental friendliness and sustainability [20–23]. Therefore, strong efforts have been devoted to explore some novel photocatalytic materials with high activities especially under visible and sunlight irradiation. Recently, considerable attention has been focused on heteropoly acids including their anions (polyoxometalates (POMs)) due to many advantages such as simple preparation, high reactivity, noncorrosive, nonpollutant, and excellent stability. POMs have been used as photocatalysts for the reductive destruction of dyes [24]. However, although POMs exhibit an excellent photocatalytic effect, their high solubility in water and polar solvents cause difficulties in the separation and recycling from the reaction system [25]. Hence, developing of efficient heterogeneous POM photocatalysts is quite necessary. One of the approaches for the generation of POM-based heterogeneous catalysts is immobilization of POM species on various supports [21, 26, 27]. Dispersion of POMs on supports with high surface area increases their catalytic activity and facilitates separation.In this work, we have used magnetic activated carbon (MAC) nanoparticles as supporting material for an organic hybrid of silicotungstic acid (STA) to prepare a heterogeneous magnetic nanophotocatalyst. The MAC nanoparticles were coated with the hexamine-silicotungstate-methylene blue (HMT-STA-MB) hybrid. To our knowledge, immobilization of POMs on MAC to remove pollutants from water has not been reported yet. The photocatalytic performance of the MAC-HMT-STA-MB composite was evaluated via photodegradation of MB, MO, RhB, and mixtures of MB/MO and MB/RhB solutions under sunlight, visible, or UV irradiation.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Silicotungstic acid (H4SiW12O40) (>99%) was purchased from Merck. The hexamethylenetetramine (HMT) or hexamine powder (C6H12N4, 99.5%) was purchased from Sina Chemical Industries Co. (Shiraz, Iran). Other reagents were purchased from commercial sources and used without further purification.


### 2.2. Apparatus

Weighing of materials was performed using an analytical balance model Sartorius MCBA 100 with a precision of ±0.0001 g. A Labinco magnetic stirrer model L-81 was used for stirring of solutions. For pH measurements, a Metrohm type 691 pH meter was used. A GBC UV-Vis spectrophotometer model Cintra 6 or Jenway 6010 spectrophotometer was used for spectrophotometric measurements. C, H, and N elemental analyses were carried out on a Perkin-Elmer 2400 CHN elemental analyzer. The IR spectra were obtained with KBr pellets using a Shimadzu 8400 s FTIR spectrometer. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed using a scanning electron microscope SEM PHENOM. X-ray diffraction patterns were carried out on a Bruker D8 advance X-ray diffractometer using Cu target at room temperature. The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) of composite was performed on a Rheometric Scientific STA 1500 thermal analyzer under the atmosphere of air. A vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM, made in Kashan University) was used to characterize the magnetic properties of the composite at room temperature. The BET surface area, pore volume, and size of the composite were measured from N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms at 77 K by using a surface area and pore size analyzer (Belsorp-mini II, Bel, Japan).


### 2.3. Preparation of MAC-HMT-STA-MB Composite

The MAC-HMT-STA-MB composite was prepared in three steps. In the first step, the HMT-STA hybrid was synthesized: 10 mL hexamine aqueous solution (1.0%w/w) was added to 10 mL silicotungstic acid aqueous solution (5% w/w). A milky suspension solution resulted immediately. The reaction was continued by stirring. Then, a white precipitate was produced. The suspension was filtrated, and the collected solid was washed with distilled water and then dried at 100°C. In the second step, the HMT-STA-MB hybrid was prepared as follows: 0.2 g of the prepared HMT-STA hybrid was added to 40 mL MB aqueous solution (100 mg·L−1) and stirred. The obtained blue precipitate was filtrated and was washed with distilled water. In the third step, 0.2 g of MAC, prepared according to our previous work [28], was added with stirring to 10 mL suspension solution of the HMT-STA-MB hybrid. The obtained MAC-HMT-STA-MB composite was filtrated and dried at 100°C. In any of the three steps, the mixtures were stirred at 500 rpm speed by a magnetic agitator at ambient temperature for 3 h.


### 2.4. Photocatalytic Activity for Degradation of Dyes

#### 2.4.1. Photocatalytic with Sunlight

Solar photocatalytic experiments were performed in the Pyrex glass vessel containing 30 mL MB (40 mg·L−1) and 13 mg of the MAC-HMT-STA-MB composite. The solutions were irradiated under direct solar radiation in consecutive sunny days in July–August 2015 between 11 am and 3 pm (GPS coordinates: N = 32° 29′, E = 53° 59′). It should be noted that the solutions were not stirred during solar irradiation.


#### 2.4.2. Photocatalytic with UV and Visible Sources

Photocatalytic degradation process was also carried out under UV and visible light irradiation. A 250 W high-pressure mercury lamp and a metal halide lamp (500 W, Philips) were used as UV and visible light sources, respectively. The 30 mL dye solution with 13 mg of composite was stirred continuously in a 200 mL water-cooled cylindrical Pyrex vessel reactor. The UV light source was placed in the middle of the vessel. The visible light source was set about 10 cm from the liquid surface of the suspension. The reaction was initiated by switching on the light source after adding the composite to dye solutions. The reaction temperature was controlled at 27°C by recycling the cooling water in a water bath. During the process, at given time intervals, 4 mL of suspension was collected and then analyzed by a UV-Vis spectrophotometer after removing the composite.The decolorization values of dye solutions were calculated by the following formula:(1)D=C0−C1C0×100=A0−A1A0×100,where D is decolorization percent and C0, A0 and C1, A1 are the concentration and absorbance of dye solution at maximum wavelength before and after irradiation, respectively.


### 2.5. MB Adsorption Experiments

Adsorption equilibrium experiments were carried out by adding 13–60 mg MAC-HMT-STA-MB into 50 mL MB solution with different concentrations (10–50 mg·L−1) at room temperature in the dark under stirring. The final concentration of MB was defined by the UV-Vis spectrometer at 664 nm. The amount of MB adsorbed onto the sorbent in mg/g was calculated using the following equation:
(2)qe=C0−CeVm,where Ce is the equilibrium concentration of MB in the solution in mg/L, C0 is initial MB concentration in mg/L, m is the amount of adsorbent mass in grams, and V is the solution volume in L.Similar to two previous works [28, 29], the isotherm model parameters were determined by nonlinear error functions minimizing using the solver add-in with Microsoft’s spreadsheet, Excel. Chi-square statistic (χ2) was used to evaluate the fitness of isotherm equations to the experimental data.


### 2.6. Kinetic Analysis

The kinetic analysis of decolorization was carried out using the pseudo first-order kinetics, ln(A0/At) = ln(C0/Ct) = kt, where A0 and C0 are the initial absorbance and concentration of dye solution, respectively, At and Ct are the absorbance and concentration of dye solution at time t, and the slope k is the kinetic constant in min−1. All C0/Ct values were obtained by the maximum absorption in the whole absorption spectrum in order to plot ln(C0/Ct) versus t.


## 2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Silicotungstic acid (H4SiW12O40) (>99%) was purchased from Merck. The hexamethylenetetramine (HMT) or hexamine powder (C6H12N4, 99.5%) was purchased from Sina Chemical Industries Co. (Shiraz, Iran). Other reagents were purchased from commercial sources and used without further purification.


## 2.2. Apparatus

Weighing of materials was performed using an analytical balance model Sartorius MCBA 100 with a precision of ±0.0001 g. A Labinco magnetic stirrer model L-81 was used for stirring of solutions. For pH measurements, a Metrohm type 691 pH meter was used. A GBC UV-Vis spectrophotometer model Cintra 6 or Jenway 6010 spectrophotometer was used for spectrophotometric measurements. C, H, and N elemental analyses were carried out on a Perkin-Elmer 2400 CHN elemental analyzer. The IR spectra were obtained with KBr pellets using a Shimadzu 8400 s FTIR spectrometer. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed using a scanning electron microscope SEM PHENOM. X-ray diffraction patterns were carried out on a Bruker D8 advance X-ray diffractometer using Cu target at room temperature. The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) of composite was performed on a Rheometric Scientific STA 1500 thermal analyzer under the atmosphere of air. A vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM, made in Kashan University) was used to characterize the magnetic properties of the composite at room temperature. The BET surface area, pore volume, and size of the composite were measured from N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms at 77 K by using a surface area and pore size analyzer (Belsorp-mini II, Bel, Japan).


## 2.3. Preparation of MAC-HMT-STA-MB Composite

The MAC-HMT-STA-MB composite was prepared in three steps. In the first step, the HMT-STA hybrid was synthesized: 10 mL hexamine aqueous solution (1.0%w/w) was added to 10 mL silicotungstic acid aqueous solution (5% w/w). A milky suspension solution resulted immediately. The reaction was continued by stirring. Then, a white precipitate was produced. The suspension was filtrated, and the collected solid was washed with distilled water and then dried at 100°C. In the second step, the HMT-STA-MB hybrid was prepared as follows: 0.2 g of the prepared HMT-STA hybrid was added to 40 mL MB aqueous solution (100 mg·L−1) and stirred. The obtained blue precipitate was filtrated and was washed with distilled water. In the third step, 0.2 g of MAC, prepared according to our previous work [28], was added with stirring to 10 mL suspension solution of the HMT-STA-MB hybrid. The obtained MAC-HMT-STA-MB composite was filtrated and dried at 100°C. In any of the three steps, the mixtures were stirred at 500 rpm speed by a magnetic agitator at ambient temperature for 3 h.


## 2.4. Photocatalytic Activity for Degradation of Dyes

### 2.4.1. Photocatalytic with Sunlight

Solar photocatalytic experiments were performed in the Pyrex glass vessel containing 30 mL MB (40 mg·L−1) and 13 mg of the MAC-HMT-STA-MB composite. The solutions were irradiated under direct solar radiation in consecutive sunny days in July–August 2015 between 11 am and 3 pm (GPS coordinates: N = 32° 29′, E = 53° 59′). It should be noted that the solutions were not stirred during solar irradiation.


### 2.4.2. Photocatalytic with UV and Visible Sources

Photocatalytic degradation process was also carried out under UV and visible light irradiation. A 250 W high-pressure mercury lamp and a metal halide lamp (500 W, Philips) were used as UV and visible light sources, respectively. The 30 mL dye solution with 13 mg of composite was stirred continuously in a 200 mL water-cooled cylindrical Pyrex vessel reactor. The UV light source was placed in the middle of the vessel. The visible light source was set about 10 cm from the liquid surface of the suspension. The reaction was initiated by switching on the light source after adding the composite to dye solutions. The reaction temperature was controlled at 27°C by recycling the cooling water in a water bath. During the process, at given time intervals, 4 mL of suspension was collected and then analyzed by a UV-Vis spectrophotometer after removing the composite.The decolorization values of dye solutions were calculated by the following formula:(1)D=C0−C1C0×100=A0−A1A0×100,where D is decolorization percent and C0, A0 and C1, A1 are the concentration and absorbance of dye solution at maximum wavelength before and after irradiation, respectively.


## 2.4.1. Photocatalytic with Sunlight

Solar photocatalytic experiments were performed in the Pyrex glass vessel containing 30 mL MB (40 mg·L−1) and 13 mg of the MAC-HMT-STA-MB composite. The solutions were irradiated under direct solar radiation in consecutive sunny days in July–August 2015 between 11 am and 3 pm (GPS coordinates: N = 32° 29′, E = 53° 59′). It should be noted that the solutions were not stirred during solar irradiation.


## 2.4.2. Photocatalytic with UV and Visible Sources

Photocatalytic degradation process was also carried out under UV and visible light irradiation. A 250 W high-pressure mercury lamp and a metal halide lamp (500 W, Philips) were used as UV and visible light sources, respectively. The 30 mL dye solution with 13 mg of composite was stirred continuously in a 200 mL water-cooled cylindrical Pyrex vessel reactor. The UV light source was placed in the middle of the vessel. The visible light source was set about 10 cm from the liquid surface of the suspension. The reaction was initiated by switching on the light source after adding the composite to dye solutions. The reaction temperature was controlled at 27°C by recycling the cooling water in a water bath. During the process, at given time intervals, 4 mL of suspension was collected and then analyzed by a UV-Vis spectrophotometer after removing the composite.The decolorization values of dye solutions were calculated by the following formula:(1)D=C0−C1C0×100=A0−A1A0×100,where D is decolorization percent and C0, A0 and C1, A1 are the concentration and absorbance of dye solution at maximum wavelength before and after irradiation, respectively.


## 2.5. MB Adsorption Experiments

Adsorption equilibrium experiments were carried out by adding 13–60 mg MAC-HMT-STA-MB into 50 mL MB solution with different concentrations (10–50 mg·L−1) at room temperature in the dark under stirring. The final concentration of MB was defined by the UV-Vis spectrometer at 664 nm. The amount of MB adsorbed onto the sorbent in mg/g was calculated using the following equation:
(2)qe=C0−CeVm,where Ce is the equilibrium concentration of MB in the solution in mg/L, C0 is initial MB concentration in mg/L, m is the amount of adsorbent mass in grams, and V is the solution volume in L.Similar to two previous works [28, 29], the isotherm model parameters were determined by nonlinear error functions minimizing using the solver add-in with Microsoft’s spreadsheet, Excel. Chi-square statistic (χ2) was used to evaluate the fitness of isotherm equations to the experimental data.


## 2.6. Kinetic Analysis

The kinetic analysis of decolorization was carried out using the pseudo first-order kinetics, ln(A0/At) = ln(C0/Ct) = kt, where A0 and C0 are the initial absorbance and concentration of dye solution, respectively, At and Ct are the absorbance and concentration of dye solution at time t, and the slope k is the kinetic constant in min−1. All C0/Ct values were obtained by the maximum absorption in the whole absorption spectrum in order to plot ln(C0/Ct) versus t.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Characterizations of Composite

The carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen elemental analyses of the HMT-STA hybrid (C, 7.42%; H, 1.33%; and N, 5.74%) reveal the attachment of seven hexamine molecules to STA and suggest the stoichiometric formula of [C6H13N4]7[SiW12O40][HSiW12O40]·3H2O for the HMT-STA hybrid. On the basis of this composition, the calculated elemental analyses are as follows: C, 7.43%; H, 1.45%; and N, 5.77%.The FTIR spectra of MAC, HMT-STA, HMT-STA-MB, and MAC-HMT-STA-MB are shown in Figure1. The IR spectrum of MAC-HMT-STA-MB composite exhibits the characteristic bands of the HMT-STA-MB hybrid and of MAC. The strong absorption peaks at 1100–750 cm−1 show the presence of SiW12O404− anions with the α-Keggin structure. The peaks at 795, 885, 970, and 920 cm−1 are attributed to the stretching modes of the corner sharing of W-Oc-W, edge sharing of W-Ob-W, terminal W-Od, and Si-O, respectively [25, 30]. The peak at about 1260 cm−1 can be attributed to vibration of the CH2 of HMT [31–33]. The peak at 1595 cm−1 corresponds to the vibration of the aromatic ring of MB [34]. The 795, 893, and 1400 cm−1 peaks of MAC overlap with other peaks, and only 623 cm−1 peak appears in the composite without overlapping.Figure 1
IR spectra of magnetic activated carbon (MAC), hexamine-silicotungstate hybrid (HMT-STA), hexamine-silicotungstate-methylene blue hybrid (HMT-STA-MB), and MAC-HMT-STA-MB nanoparticle.Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to characterize the morphology of the composite material. The SEM image of MAC-HMT-STA-MB (Figures2(a), 2(b), and 2(c)) shows that the morphology is similar to that of the bare MAC support [28] and POM hybrid has indwelled in pores. The specific surface area, total pore volume, and mean pore diameter of the MAC-HMT-STA-MB were measured using the BET method with N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms (Figure 2(d)). The specific surface area of the composite was 13.180 m2/g, which is lower than that of MAC (54.451 m2/g). This difference can be explained by the fact that the pores are filled by the HMT-STA-MB hybrid. The mean pore diameter and total pore volume were 40.992 nm and 0.1351 cm3 g−1, respectively. According to the IUPAC classification, the mentioned mean pore diameter belongs to the mesopore groups. Moreover, N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm is classified as type IV according to the IUPAC classification, indicating that the MAC-HMT-STA-MB structure is mesoporous [35].Figure 2
SEM images of MAC-HMT-STA-MB. (a) 1000x, (b) 5000x, (c) 10000x, and (d) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm and pore size distribution.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)In order to confirm the solid structure of the hybrid, the powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of HMT-STA and MAC-HMT-STA-MB are collected in Figure3(a). The positions of the sharp peaks below 2θ = 10° can be ascribed to SiW12O404− of the HMT-STA hybrid. The typical peaks at 2θ = 21.04°, 35.48°, 45.68°, 53.16°, 55.20°, 58.96°, and 62.96° are from MAC [8, 28, 36, 37]. Therefore, the primary structure of POM has remained intact in the solid structure of composite.Figure 3
(a) X-ray diffraction patterns of HMT-STA hybrid and MAC-HMT-STA-MB composite, (b) TGA and DSC curves, (c, d) magnetization curve, and (e) photograph of magnetic property of MAC-HMT-STA-MB.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)The TG and DSC curves of the MAC-HMT-STA-MB composite are shown in Figure3(b). Based on the formula of the HMT-STA hybrid and the MAC composition (65% Fe3O4, 25% carbon, and 10% H2O [28]), the stoichiometric formula of the composite is proposed to be C7Fe3O4[C6H13N4]7[C16H18N3S]3[SiW12O40][HSiW12O40]Cl3 and thermal curves can be well interpreted. The first weight loss of 5.19% and the exothermic peak at ca. 100–270°C are ascribed to the loss of three hexamine molecules attached to HSiW12O403− (calculated value is 5.28%). These weak binding HMT molecules are easily detached from the composite and then decomposed. It has been reported that the hexamine and its complexes are sublimated with decomposition at atmospheric pressure about 230–290°C [38–40]. Then, the strong binding HMT molecules (i.e., four hexamine molecules attached to SiW12O404−) are released and then decomposed. Therefore, the second weight loss of 7.01% and the exothermic peak at 305°C is corresponding to these HMT molecules (calculated loss value is 7.04%). The third weight loss of 11.66% and the exothermic peak at 541°C is related to the decomposition of three MB molecules attracted to the HMT-STA hybrid, the oxidation of the carbon [28], and the decomposition of silicotungstate to WO3 and SiO2 at about 550°C [41] (calculated loss value is 11.68%). The whole weight loss of 23.86% is compatible with the calculated value (24.00%).The magnetic characterization of MAC-HMT-STA-MB and its enlargement near the origin are shown in Figures3(c) and 3(d). As can be seen, the resultant composite has superparamagnetic behavior with saturation magnetization (Ms) of 6.7 emu/g (in the magnetic field equal to ±8.5 kOe). Figure 3(e) shows that the particles of the composite can be attracted by an external magnet. The Ms of the composite has dropped as compared with MAC (Ms = 34.6 emu/g [28]) due to the inclusion of POM hybrid coating.


### 3.2. Composite Activity for Removal and Degradation of MB

In the first, the efficiency of the composite for the wastewater treatment was evaluated by removal and degradation of MB. Before the photocatalytic degradation, adsorption of MB on the composite was evaluated. The adsorption of MB has been reported by MAC containing different iron oxide values [8, 11]. It has been proven that the affinity of MAC to cationic dyes is much higher than that to anionic dyes. Hence, the MAC has been coated with HMT-STA-MB instead of HMT-STA because the surface charge of HMT-STA is negative due to the existence of silicotungstate. However, the affinity of MAC-HMT-STA-MB toward MB molecules is high despite the HMT-STA-MB coating so that it demonstrated high adsorption capacity for MB (Figure 4(c)) much higher than MAC (Figure 4(a)). Despite the adsorbed MB on the surface of the composite, it is yet negative due to the existence of silicotungstate with high electronegative oxygens. Therefore, the interaction between these polyoxoanions and the cationic dye molecules makes a good adsorption toward MB molecules. To further study, the adsorption isotherm of MB adsorbed onto the composite was recorded. The most common isotherms for describing solid-liquid sorption systems are the Langmuir, the Freundlich, and the Toth isotherms. Figure 5 shows the experimental adsorption isotherms for MB/MAC-HMT-STA-MB system along with the curve fitted by isotherm models. The isotherm parameters and values of chi-square are also shown in Table 1. Examination of isotherm plots (Figure 5) shows that the Toth isotherm more accurately describes the sorption behavior of MB on MAC-HMT-STA-MB due to exhibiting the lowest value of χ2. The adsorption data obeyed the Toth model exhibiting heterogeneous surface conditions and monolayer adsorption. Therefore, the adsorbate has a high affinity for the surface at low surface coverage. However, as coverage increases, the affinity of the adsorbate for the surface decreases (Figure 5). The order of adsorption of isotherm models for MB is Toth > Langmuir > Freundlich. This order is identical with the sorption behavior of MB on HMT-STA [33].Figure 4
UV-Vis absorption spectra of MB (20 mg/L, 50 mL) during the adsorption on MAC (0.5 g/L) in the dark (a), the photodegradation under UV (b), the adsorption on MAC-HMT-STA-MB (0.5 g/L) in the dark (c), and changes in decolorization versus time (d).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure 5
The Langmuir, Freundlich, and Toth isotherms for the adsorption of MB by MAC-HMT-STA-MB.Table 1
Parameters of the isotherm models for the adsorption of MB onto MAC-HMT-STA-MB.
Model
Equation
Parameter
Value
χ
2
Toth
q
e
=
K
t
C
e
a
t
+
C
e
1
/
t
Kt
at
1/t
5003.19618.5642.118
10.571
Langmuir
q
e
=
q
m
K
a
C
e
1
+
K
a
C
e
qm
Ka
46.7340.281
13.729
Freundlich
q
e
=
K
F
C
e
1
/
n
KF
1/n
15.7460.285
17.325The composite was then tested as a catalyst for the photocatalytic degradation of MB. While the MAC shows very low photocatalytic activity toward MB degradation under UV light (Figure4(b)), the MAC-HMT-STA-MB is very active (Figure 6(d)). Compared to adsorption (Figure 6(a)), photocatalytic degradation with MAC-HMT-STA-MB displays higher kinetic constant (k) and removal efficiency (Figures 6(b), 6(c), 6(d), and 6(e)). The kinetic constants of MB (40 mg/L) removal in the solar, visible, and UV photocatalytic process with composite (0.44 g/L) are 11.5, 10.1, and 9.9 times higher than that in the adsorption process, respectively (Figure 6(f)).Figure 6
UV-Vis absorption spectra of MB (40 mg/L, 30 mL) during the adsorption on MAC-HMT-STA-MB (0.44 g/L) in the dark (a), during the photodegradation under sunlight and corresponding digital image of solution before and after irradiation (b), visible (c), UV (d), changes in decolorization versus time (e), and their kinetic constants (f).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)


### 3.3. Photocatalytic Activity for RhB Degradation

To further explore the activity of the composite, it was applied for photodecomposition of RhB under sunlight irradiation. Before the photocatalytic degradation of RhB, the adsorption process was studied in aqueous solution (pH = without adjustment = 7.4). MAC-HMT-STA-MB cannot adsorb RhB because RhB (pKa = 3.1) is as neutral form in pH 7.4 (Figure 7(a)).Figure 7
UV-Vis absorption spectra of RhB (20 mg/L, 20 mL, pH = without adjustment = 7.4) (a) and the mixed solution of RhB and MB (each dye 10 mg/L, total volume = 40 mL, pH = without adjustment) (b) during the adsorption on 0.47 g/L and 0.23 g/L of MAC-HMT-STA-MB, respectively, in the dark; spectra of the mixed solution of RhB (8 mg/L) and MB (45 mg/L, total volume = 50 mL) during the photodegradation under sunlight in the presence of the MAC-HMT-STA-MB (0.44 g/L) in the pH = 7.6 (without adjustment) (c) and pH = 2.5 (d) and corresponding digital images of the mixed solutions before and after irradiation.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


### 3.4. Photocatalytic Activity for Mixture of MB and RhB

The real wastewater can not only contain a single component. Hence, the mixture of MB and RhB was selected to explore the ability of the composite in the degradation of mixed dye molecules. The adsorption experiment (Figure7(b)) shows that the absorption peak of MB molecules quickly disappeared, just leaving the characteristic absorption peak of RhB. The photodegradation was also performed. Figure 7(c) shows the spectra of the mixed solution of MB and RhB during the photodegradation under sunlight irradiation in the presence of 0.44 g/L of the composite in pH 7.6 (without adjustment). The spectra clearly confirm that the composite degrades both MB and RhB dyes, but the rate and percent of RhB decolorization are lower than those of MB. It is interesting that the light is able to degrade RhB in the mixed solutions in the presence of the composite, while it could not degrade alone RhB (RhB solution after adsorption experiment (Figure 7(a)) was irradiated with UV light and was not observed any change). Because MAC-HMT-STA-MB has a surface negative charge, the cationic MB molecules are preferentially adsorbed on it. Then, the surface of the hybrid possessing a slightly positive charge does not adsorb the neutral RhB molecules. Indeed, the lower uptake of RhB decreases the efficiency of degradation. For this reason, the decreasing of pH increases the efficiency of its degradation (Figure 7(d)) because RhB is as anionic form in pH 2.5.


### 3.5. Composite Activity for MO Solution

To further investigation, MAC-HMT-STA-MB was applied for MO solution. Before the photocatalytic degradation of MO, the adsorption process was studied in aqueous solution (pH = without adjustment = 4.5). MO cannot adsorb on the composite because it is as anionic form in pH 4.5 (Figure8(a)).Figure 8
UV-Vis absorption spectra of MO (20 mg/L, 20 mL, pH = without adjustment = 4.5) (a) and the mixed solution of MO and MB (each dye 10 mg/L, total volume = 40 mL, pH = without adjustment = 6.3) (b) during the adsorption on 0.65 g/L and 0.32 g/L of MAC-HMT-STA-MB, respectively, in the dark; spectra of the mixed solution of MO (16 mg/L) and MB (45 mg/L, total volume = 50 mL) during the photodegradation under sunlight in the presence of the MAC-HMT-STA-MB (0.44 g/L) in the pH = 8.2 (without adjustment) (c) and pH = 2.5 (d) and corresponding digital images of the mixed solutions before and after irradiation. Note: in all experiments, the absorbance was measured in a 10 mm cell except the mixed solution of MO (16 mg/L) and MB (45 mg/L) (c and d) that were measured in a 1 mm cell.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


### 3.6. Photocatalytic Activity for Mixture of MB and MO

To further confirm whether MAC-HMT-STA-MB has the ability to separate MB dye from mixed dye solution, the mixture of MB and MO was prepared and used. Figure8(b) shows the adsorption experiment of the mixed solution of MB and MO in the presence of 0.32 g/L of the composite in pH 6.3 (without adjustment). The spectra show the quick adsorption of MB and remaining of MO. The photodegradation was also performed. Figure 8(c) shows the spectra of the mixed solutions of MB and MO during the photodegradation under sunlight irradiation in the presence of 0.44 g/L of the composite in pH 8.2 (without adjustment). The spectra clearly confirm that the composite degrades both MB and MO dyes. It is interesting that the light is able to degrade MO in the mixed solution in the presence of the composite, while it could not degrade alone MO (MO solution after adsorption experiment (Figure 8(a)) was irradiated with UV light and was not observed any change). Because MAC-HMT-STA-MB has a surface negative charge, the cationic MB molecules are preferentially adsorbed on it. Then, the surface of the hybrid possessing a slightly positive charge adsorbs the anionic MO molecules. Indeed, the higher adsorption of MO increases the efficiency of its degradation. For this reason, the decreasing of pH to 2.5 decreases the efficiency of degradation (Figure 8(d)) because MO is as neutral form in pH 2.5.


### 3.7. Outline of Photodegradation Mechanism

The photodegradation mechanism takes place through dye-sensitized degradation. Dye-sensitized degradations take place in cases where there exists an interaction between dye and photocatalyst [42]. Particularly, favorable conditions are encountered in the present situation due to both species (POM and MB) which exist in the adsorbed state. Therefore, the process of degradation involves absorption of light by the MB molecules followed by charge injection into the HMT-STA moiety of the composite and then oxidative degradation of adsorbed dye. A proposed photodegradation mechanism is deduced that absorption of light (hv) by the MAC-HMT-STA-MB generates the excited state of the POM hybrid moiety (HMT‐STA‐MB∗):
(3)MAC‐HMT‐STA‐MB+hv→MAC‐HMT‐STA‐MB∗This excited state of the hybrid results from the oxygen to metal charge transfer band of STA [24]. The HMT‐STA‐MB∗ is a strong oxidant able to oxidize and, most often, mineralize organic dyes. There are two pathways through which the excited HMT‐STA reduced: reaction with excited organic dye in aqueous solution (reactions (4) and (5)):
(4)Dye+hv→Dye∗(5)HMT‐STA‐MB∗+Dye∗→HMT‐STA‐MBe−+Dye+•(6)Dye+•→decompositionintocolorlessproductsand reaction through formation of •OH radicals from the reaction with H2O [43]:
(7)HMT‐STA‐MB∗+H2O→HMT‐STA‐MBe−+OH•+H+The organic dye is oxidized directly (reaction (6)) and indirectly by •OH radicals generated in reaction (7). The reduced hybrid can be reoxidized by reduction of dye:
(8)HMT‐STA‐MBe−+Dye→HMT‐STA‐MB+reductionproductsAs it was confirmed, the uptake of MB, RhB, and MO on the composite is high, relatively low, and very low, respectively. In the same way, the photodegradation of the ternary mixed solution of them conform to this trend (Figure9). The higher photodegradation of RhB and MO in the mixed solution with MB is due to higher uptake of them on the surface of the composite after uptake of MB.Figure 9
UV-Vis absorption spectra of the mixed solution of MO (4 mg/L), RhB (4 mg/L), and MB (45 mg/L, total volume = 50 mL) during the photodegradation under sunlight in the presence of the MAC-HMT-STA-MB (0.44 g/L) in the pH = 2.5 and corresponding digital images of the mixed solution before and after irradiation.


### 3.8. The Reusability of Magnetic Nanophotocatalyst

The reusability and stability of the catalysts are important characteristics in catalytic technology considering economic feasibility. After adsorption-photodegradation experiments, the MAC-HMT-STA-MB nanoparticles can be isolated from the solution using a magnet. To test the release ability of MB adsorbed, various eluting solutions were added such as pure water, pure ethanol solution, and the mixed solution of NaCl with ethanol/methanol and water. Results (Figure10(a)) show that the MB molecules on MAC-HMT-STA-MB are released faster in the solution of NaCl with methanol and H2O than other solutions. It should be noted that all adsorbed MB molecules cannot be released into the solution during one elution. The successive elution cycles are needed for releasing all MB molecules. The reusability of the composite was tested by adsorption of 20 mg/L MB solution on once eluted MAC-HMT-STA-MB. The result (Figure 10(b)) indicated that the adsorption ability of the composite remains, and hence, it can be reused for removal cycle of dye.Figure 10
The UV-Vis spectra of desorbed MB solution from MB@MAC-HMT-STA-MB using various elution solutions (a) and UV-Vis spectra of MB (20 mg/L, 30 mL) during the adsorption on eluted MAC-HMT-STA-MB (0.25 g/L) with ethanol (b).
(a)
(b)


### 3.9. Comparison with Other STA-Immobilized Catalysts

To compare the photocatalytic efficiency of the MAC-HMT-STA-MB composite with other STA-immobilized catalysts reported in the literature, we have summarized the results in Table2. The advantages of the present magnetic nanophotocatalyst are that it does not use expensive organic moieties (see footnotes of Table 2) in the catalyst preparation, has higher rate of decolorization, and shows photocatalytic behavior under visible and sunlight besides UV light.Table 2
Comparison of photodegradation of MB, MO, and RhB by using STA, different STA-immobilized catalysts reported in the literature, and MAC-HMT-STA-MB.
Catalysts
Light
Cdye (mg/L)
Catalyst dosage (g/L)
Time (min)
Decolorization (%)
Ref.
SiW12O404− (homogeneous catalyst)
UV
MB (10)
0.17
90
98.5
[44]
SiW12O404− (homogeneous catalyst)
Vis.
MO (4.5)a
8.89
140
21
[25]
H4SiW12O40 (powder)
UV
MO (10)
1
30
4.6
[45]
H4SiW12O40
Vis.
RhB (10)
1
480
45
[46]
H4SiW12O40/PVA
Vis.
RhB (10)
1
480
74
[46]
H4SiW12O40/PVA/Ag
Vis.
RhB (10)
1
480
100
[46]
(C16H36N)4(SiW12O40)-PVDF
UV
MO (15)
2 + 1.5 mM H2O2
510
97a
[47]
(SiW12O40)30%-zeolite (NH4Y)
UV
MO (26)
0.5 + 0.9 L/min air
240
73
[48]
(SiW12O40)30%-zeolite (ZSM5)
UV
MO (26)
0.5 + 0.9 L/min air
240
75
[48]
Ag@Ag4SiW12O40
Vis.
MO (20)
1.25
5
100
[49]
MFNs@SiO2@Ag4SiW12O40/Ag
Vis.
MB (3.2)
0.5
10
90a
[50]
SiW12O40-PANI-SnO2
Vis.b
RhB (4.8)
20
60
100a
[51]
H4SiW12O40/PVA/PMMA
UV
MO (10)
1c
30
95.1
[45]
H4SiW12O40/PVA
UV
MO (10)
1c
30
75.2
[45]
H4SiW12O40/PMMA
UV
MO (10)
1c
30
13.8
[52]
H4SiW12O40/PA6
UV
MO (10)
5
30
99.3
[53]
H4SiW12O40/TiO2/K2Ti6O13
UV
MO (10)
1
70
50a
[54]
MAC-HMT-STA-MB
Solar/Vis./UV
MB (40)
0.44
75
94.9/91.9/92.7
This work
MAC-HMT-STA-MB
Solar
MB (45) + RhB (8)
0.44
120
90.1 + 63.8
This work
MAC-HMT-STA-MB
Solar
MB (45) + MO (16)
0.44
75
91.0 + 59.0
This work
aValue was estimated from original figure of the reference; bhigh-voltage 250 W Hg lamp; c[H4SiW12O40] = 1 g/L. PVDF = poly(vinylidene fluoride); MFNs = magnesium ferrite nanoparticles; PANI = polyaniline; PVA = poly(vinyl alcohol); PMMA = poly(methyl methacrylate); PA6 = polycaprolactam.


## 3.1. Characterizations of Composite

The carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen elemental analyses of the HMT-STA hybrid (C, 7.42%; H, 1.33%; and N, 5.74%) reveal the attachment of seven hexamine molecules to STA and suggest the stoichiometric formula of [C6H13N4]7[SiW12O40][HSiW12O40]·3H2O for the HMT-STA hybrid. On the basis of this composition, the calculated elemental analyses are as follows: C, 7.43%; H, 1.45%; and N, 5.77%.The FTIR spectra of MAC, HMT-STA, HMT-STA-MB, and MAC-HMT-STA-MB are shown in Figure1. The IR spectrum of MAC-HMT-STA-MB composite exhibits the characteristic bands of the HMT-STA-MB hybrid and of MAC. The strong absorption peaks at 1100–750 cm−1 show the presence of SiW12O404− anions with the α-Keggin structure. The peaks at 795, 885, 970, and 920 cm−1 are attributed to the stretching modes of the corner sharing of W-Oc-W, edge sharing of W-Ob-W, terminal W-Od, and Si-O, respectively [25, 30]. The peak at about 1260 cm−1 can be attributed to vibration of the CH2 of HMT [31–33]. The peak at 1595 cm−1 corresponds to the vibration of the aromatic ring of MB [34]. The 795, 893, and 1400 cm−1 peaks of MAC overlap with other peaks, and only 623 cm−1 peak appears in the composite without overlapping.Figure 1
IR spectra of magnetic activated carbon (MAC), hexamine-silicotungstate hybrid (HMT-STA), hexamine-silicotungstate-methylene blue hybrid (HMT-STA-MB), and MAC-HMT-STA-MB nanoparticle.Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to characterize the morphology of the composite material. The SEM image of MAC-HMT-STA-MB (Figures2(a), 2(b), and 2(c)) shows that the morphology is similar to that of the bare MAC support [28] and POM hybrid has indwelled in pores. The specific surface area, total pore volume, and mean pore diameter of the MAC-HMT-STA-MB were measured using the BET method with N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms (Figure 2(d)). The specific surface area of the composite was 13.180 m2/g, which is lower than that of MAC (54.451 m2/g). This difference can be explained by the fact that the pores are filled by the HMT-STA-MB hybrid. The mean pore diameter and total pore volume were 40.992 nm and 0.1351 cm3 g−1, respectively. According to the IUPAC classification, the mentioned mean pore diameter belongs to the mesopore groups. Moreover, N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm is classified as type IV according to the IUPAC classification, indicating that the MAC-HMT-STA-MB structure is mesoporous [35].Figure 2
SEM images of MAC-HMT-STA-MB. (a) 1000x, (b) 5000x, (c) 10000x, and (d) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm and pore size distribution.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)In order to confirm the solid structure of the hybrid, the powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of HMT-STA and MAC-HMT-STA-MB are collected in Figure3(a). The positions of the sharp peaks below 2θ = 10° can be ascribed to SiW12O404− of the HMT-STA hybrid. The typical peaks at 2θ = 21.04°, 35.48°, 45.68°, 53.16°, 55.20°, 58.96°, and 62.96° are from MAC [8, 28, 36, 37]. Therefore, the primary structure of POM has remained intact in the solid structure of composite.Figure 3
(a) X-ray diffraction patterns of HMT-STA hybrid and MAC-HMT-STA-MB composite, (b) TGA and DSC curves, (c, d) magnetization curve, and (e) photograph of magnetic property of MAC-HMT-STA-MB.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)The TG and DSC curves of the MAC-HMT-STA-MB composite are shown in Figure3(b). Based on the formula of the HMT-STA hybrid and the MAC composition (65% Fe3O4, 25% carbon, and 10% H2O [28]), the stoichiometric formula of the composite is proposed to be C7Fe3O4[C6H13N4]7[C16H18N3S]3[SiW12O40][HSiW12O40]Cl3 and thermal curves can be well interpreted. The first weight loss of 5.19% and the exothermic peak at ca. 100–270°C are ascribed to the loss of three hexamine molecules attached to HSiW12O403− (calculated value is 5.28%). These weak binding HMT molecules are easily detached from the composite and then decomposed. It has been reported that the hexamine and its complexes are sublimated with decomposition at atmospheric pressure about 230–290°C [38–40]. Then, the strong binding HMT molecules (i.e., four hexamine molecules attached to SiW12O404−) are released and then decomposed. Therefore, the second weight loss of 7.01% and the exothermic peak at 305°C is corresponding to these HMT molecules (calculated loss value is 7.04%). The third weight loss of 11.66% and the exothermic peak at 541°C is related to the decomposition of three MB molecules attracted to the HMT-STA hybrid, the oxidation of the carbon [28], and the decomposition of silicotungstate to WO3 and SiO2 at about 550°C [41] (calculated loss value is 11.68%). The whole weight loss of 23.86% is compatible with the calculated value (24.00%).The magnetic characterization of MAC-HMT-STA-MB and its enlargement near the origin are shown in Figures3(c) and 3(d). As can be seen, the resultant composite has superparamagnetic behavior with saturation magnetization (Ms) of 6.7 emu/g (in the magnetic field equal to ±8.5 kOe). Figure 3(e) shows that the particles of the composite can be attracted by an external magnet. The Ms of the composite has dropped as compared with MAC (Ms = 34.6 emu/g [28]) due to the inclusion of POM hybrid coating.


## 3.2. Composite Activity for Removal and Degradation of MB

In the first, the efficiency of the composite for the wastewater treatment was evaluated by removal and degradation of MB. Before the photocatalytic degradation, adsorption of MB on the composite was evaluated. The adsorption of MB has been reported by MAC containing different iron oxide values [8, 11]. It has been proven that the affinity of MAC to cationic dyes is much higher than that to anionic dyes. Hence, the MAC has been coated with HMT-STA-MB instead of HMT-STA because the surface charge of HMT-STA is negative due to the existence of silicotungstate. However, the affinity of MAC-HMT-STA-MB toward MB molecules is high despite the HMT-STA-MB coating so that it demonstrated high adsorption capacity for MB (Figure 4(c)) much higher than MAC (Figure 4(a)). Despite the adsorbed MB on the surface of the composite, it is yet negative due to the existence of silicotungstate with high electronegative oxygens. Therefore, the interaction between these polyoxoanions and the cationic dye molecules makes a good adsorption toward MB molecules. To further study, the adsorption isotherm of MB adsorbed onto the composite was recorded. The most common isotherms for describing solid-liquid sorption systems are the Langmuir, the Freundlich, and the Toth isotherms. Figure 5 shows the experimental adsorption isotherms for MB/MAC-HMT-STA-MB system along with the curve fitted by isotherm models. The isotherm parameters and values of chi-square are also shown in Table 1. Examination of isotherm plots (Figure 5) shows that the Toth isotherm more accurately describes the sorption behavior of MB on MAC-HMT-STA-MB due to exhibiting the lowest value of χ2. The adsorption data obeyed the Toth model exhibiting heterogeneous surface conditions and monolayer adsorption. Therefore, the adsorbate has a high affinity for the surface at low surface coverage. However, as coverage increases, the affinity of the adsorbate for the surface decreases (Figure 5). The order of adsorption of isotherm models for MB is Toth > Langmuir > Freundlich. This order is identical with the sorption behavior of MB on HMT-STA [33].Figure 4
UV-Vis absorption spectra of MB (20 mg/L, 50 mL) during the adsorption on MAC (0.5 g/L) in the dark (a), the photodegradation under UV (b), the adsorption on MAC-HMT-STA-MB (0.5 g/L) in the dark (c), and changes in decolorization versus time (d).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure 5
The Langmuir, Freundlich, and Toth isotherms for the adsorption of MB by MAC-HMT-STA-MB.Table 1
Parameters of the isotherm models for the adsorption of MB onto MAC-HMT-STA-MB.
Model
Equation
Parameter
Value
χ
2
Toth
q
e
=
K
t
C
e
a
t
+
C
e
1
/
t
Kt
at
1/t
5003.19618.5642.118
10.571
Langmuir
q
e
=
q
m
K
a
C
e
1
+
K
a
C
e
qm
Ka
46.7340.281
13.729
Freundlich
q
e
=
K
F
C
e
1
/
n
KF
1/n
15.7460.285
17.325The composite was then tested as a catalyst for the photocatalytic degradation of MB. While the MAC shows very low photocatalytic activity toward MB degradation under UV light (Figure4(b)), the MAC-HMT-STA-MB is very active (Figure 6(d)). Compared to adsorption (Figure 6(a)), photocatalytic degradation with MAC-HMT-STA-MB displays higher kinetic constant (k) and removal efficiency (Figures 6(b), 6(c), 6(d), and 6(e)). The kinetic constants of MB (40 mg/L) removal in the solar, visible, and UV photocatalytic process with composite (0.44 g/L) are 11.5, 10.1, and 9.9 times higher than that in the adsorption process, respectively (Figure 6(f)).Figure 6
UV-Vis absorption spectra of MB (40 mg/L, 30 mL) during the adsorption on MAC-HMT-STA-MB (0.44 g/L) in the dark (a), during the photodegradation under sunlight and corresponding digital image of solution before and after irradiation (b), visible (c), UV (d), changes in decolorization versus time (e), and their kinetic constants (f).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)


## 3.3. Photocatalytic Activity for RhB Degradation

To further explore the activity of the composite, it was applied for photodecomposition of RhB under sunlight irradiation. Before the photocatalytic degradation of RhB, the adsorption process was studied in aqueous solution (pH = without adjustment = 7.4). MAC-HMT-STA-MB cannot adsorb RhB because RhB (pKa = 3.1) is as neutral form in pH 7.4 (Figure 7(a)).Figure 7
UV-Vis absorption spectra of RhB (20 mg/L, 20 mL, pH = without adjustment = 7.4) (a) and the mixed solution of RhB and MB (each dye 10 mg/L, total volume = 40 mL, pH = without adjustment) (b) during the adsorption on 0.47 g/L and 0.23 g/L of MAC-HMT-STA-MB, respectively, in the dark; spectra of the mixed solution of RhB (8 mg/L) and MB (45 mg/L, total volume = 50 mL) during the photodegradation under sunlight in the presence of the MAC-HMT-STA-MB (0.44 g/L) in the pH = 7.6 (without adjustment) (c) and pH = 2.5 (d) and corresponding digital images of the mixed solutions before and after irradiation.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.4. Photocatalytic Activity for Mixture of MB and RhB

The real wastewater can not only contain a single component. Hence, the mixture of MB and RhB was selected to explore the ability of the composite in the degradation of mixed dye molecules. The adsorption experiment (Figure7(b)) shows that the absorption peak of MB molecules quickly disappeared, just leaving the characteristic absorption peak of RhB. The photodegradation was also performed. Figure 7(c) shows the spectra of the mixed solution of MB and RhB during the photodegradation under sunlight irradiation in the presence of 0.44 g/L of the composite in pH 7.6 (without adjustment). The spectra clearly confirm that the composite degrades both MB and RhB dyes, but the rate and percent of RhB decolorization are lower than those of MB. It is interesting that the light is able to degrade RhB in the mixed solutions in the presence of the composite, while it could not degrade alone RhB (RhB solution after adsorption experiment (Figure 7(a)) was irradiated with UV light and was not observed any change). Because MAC-HMT-STA-MB has a surface negative charge, the cationic MB molecules are preferentially adsorbed on it. Then, the surface of the hybrid possessing a slightly positive charge does not adsorb the neutral RhB molecules. Indeed, the lower uptake of RhB decreases the efficiency of degradation. For this reason, the decreasing of pH increases the efficiency of its degradation (Figure 7(d)) because RhB is as anionic form in pH 2.5.


## 3.5. Composite Activity for MO Solution

To further investigation, MAC-HMT-STA-MB was applied for MO solution. Before the photocatalytic degradation of MO, the adsorption process was studied in aqueous solution (pH = without adjustment = 4.5). MO cannot adsorb on the composite because it is as anionic form in pH 4.5 (Figure8(a)).Figure 8
UV-Vis absorption spectra of MO (20 mg/L, 20 mL, pH = without adjustment = 4.5) (a) and the mixed solution of MO and MB (each dye 10 mg/L, total volume = 40 mL, pH = without adjustment = 6.3) (b) during the adsorption on 0.65 g/L and 0.32 g/L of MAC-HMT-STA-MB, respectively, in the dark; spectra of the mixed solution of MO (16 mg/L) and MB (45 mg/L, total volume = 50 mL) during the photodegradation under sunlight in the presence of the MAC-HMT-STA-MB (0.44 g/L) in the pH = 8.2 (without adjustment) (c) and pH = 2.5 (d) and corresponding digital images of the mixed solutions before and after irradiation. Note: in all experiments, the absorbance was measured in a 10 mm cell except the mixed solution of MO (16 mg/L) and MB (45 mg/L) (c and d) that were measured in a 1 mm cell.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.6. Photocatalytic Activity for Mixture of MB and MO

To further confirm whether MAC-HMT-STA-MB has the ability to separate MB dye from mixed dye solution, the mixture of MB and MO was prepared and used. Figure8(b) shows the adsorption experiment of the mixed solution of MB and MO in the presence of 0.32 g/L of the composite in pH 6.3 (without adjustment). The spectra show the quick adsorption of MB and remaining of MO. The photodegradation was also performed. Figure 8(c) shows the spectra of the mixed solutions of MB and MO during the photodegradation under sunlight irradiation in the presence of 0.44 g/L of the composite in pH 8.2 (without adjustment). The spectra clearly confirm that the composite degrades both MB and MO dyes. It is interesting that the light is able to degrade MO in the mixed solution in the presence of the composite, while it could not degrade alone MO (MO solution after adsorption experiment (Figure 8(a)) was irradiated with UV light and was not observed any change). Because MAC-HMT-STA-MB has a surface negative charge, the cationic MB molecules are preferentially adsorbed on it. Then, the surface of the hybrid possessing a slightly positive charge adsorbs the anionic MO molecules. Indeed, the higher adsorption of MO increases the efficiency of its degradation. For this reason, the decreasing of pH to 2.5 decreases the efficiency of degradation (Figure 8(d)) because MO is as neutral form in pH 2.5.


## 3.7. Outline of Photodegradation Mechanism

The photodegradation mechanism takes place through dye-sensitized degradation. Dye-sensitized degradations take place in cases where there exists an interaction between dye and photocatalyst [42]. Particularly, favorable conditions are encountered in the present situation due to both species (POM and MB) which exist in the adsorbed state. Therefore, the process of degradation involves absorption of light by the MB molecules followed by charge injection into the HMT-STA moiety of the composite and then oxidative degradation of adsorbed dye. A proposed photodegradation mechanism is deduced that absorption of light (hv) by the MAC-HMT-STA-MB generates the excited state of the POM hybrid moiety (HMT‐STA‐MB∗):
(3)MAC‐HMT‐STA‐MB+hv→MAC‐HMT‐STA‐MB∗This excited state of the hybrid results from the oxygen to metal charge transfer band of STA [24]. The HMT‐STA‐MB∗ is a strong oxidant able to oxidize and, most often, mineralize organic dyes. There are two pathways through which the excited HMT‐STA reduced: reaction with excited organic dye in aqueous solution (reactions (4) and (5)):
(4)Dye+hv→Dye∗(5)HMT‐STA‐MB∗+Dye∗→HMT‐STA‐MBe−+Dye+•(6)Dye+•→decompositionintocolorlessproductsand reaction through formation of •OH radicals from the reaction with H2O [43]:
(7)HMT‐STA‐MB∗+H2O→HMT‐STA‐MBe−+OH•+H+The organic dye is oxidized directly (reaction (6)) and indirectly by •OH radicals generated in reaction (7). The reduced hybrid can be reoxidized by reduction of dye:
(8)HMT‐STA‐MBe−+Dye→HMT‐STA‐MB+reductionproductsAs it was confirmed, the uptake of MB, RhB, and MO on the composite is high, relatively low, and very low, respectively. In the same way, the photodegradation of the ternary mixed solution of them conform to this trend (Figure9). The higher photodegradation of RhB and MO in the mixed solution with MB is due to higher uptake of them on the surface of the composite after uptake of MB.Figure 9
UV-Vis absorption spectra of the mixed solution of MO (4 mg/L), RhB (4 mg/L), and MB (45 mg/L, total volume = 50 mL) during the photodegradation under sunlight in the presence of the MAC-HMT-STA-MB (0.44 g/L) in the pH = 2.5 and corresponding digital images of the mixed solution before and after irradiation.


## 3.8. The Reusability of Magnetic Nanophotocatalyst

The reusability and stability of the catalysts are important characteristics in catalytic technology considering economic feasibility. After adsorption-photodegradation experiments, the MAC-HMT-STA-MB nanoparticles can be isolated from the solution using a magnet. To test the release ability of MB adsorbed, various eluting solutions were added such as pure water, pure ethanol solution, and the mixed solution of NaCl with ethanol/methanol and water. Results (Figure10(a)) show that the MB molecules on MAC-HMT-STA-MB are released faster in the solution of NaCl with methanol and H2O than other solutions. It should be noted that all adsorbed MB molecules cannot be released into the solution during one elution. The successive elution cycles are needed for releasing all MB molecules. The reusability of the composite was tested by adsorption of 20 mg/L MB solution on once eluted MAC-HMT-STA-MB. The result (Figure 10(b)) indicated that the adsorption ability of the composite remains, and hence, it can be reused for removal cycle of dye.Figure 10
The UV-Vis spectra of desorbed MB solution from MB@MAC-HMT-STA-MB using various elution solutions (a) and UV-Vis spectra of MB (20 mg/L, 30 mL) during the adsorption on eluted MAC-HMT-STA-MB (0.25 g/L) with ethanol (b).
(a)
(b)


## 3.9. Comparison with Other STA-Immobilized Catalysts

To compare the photocatalytic efficiency of the MAC-HMT-STA-MB composite with other STA-immobilized catalysts reported in the literature, we have summarized the results in Table2. The advantages of the present magnetic nanophotocatalyst are that it does not use expensive organic moieties (see footnotes of Table 2) in the catalyst preparation, has higher rate of decolorization, and shows photocatalytic behavior under visible and sunlight besides UV light.Table 2
Comparison of photodegradation of MB, MO, and RhB by using STA, different STA-immobilized catalysts reported in the literature, and MAC-HMT-STA-MB.
Catalysts
Light
Cdye (mg/L)
Catalyst dosage (g/L)
Time (min)
Decolorization (%)
Ref.
SiW12O404− (homogeneous catalyst)
UV
MB (10)
0.17
90
98.5
[44]
SiW12O404− (homogeneous catalyst)
Vis.
MO (4.5)a
8.89
140
21
[25]
H4SiW12O40 (powder)
UV
MO (10)
1
30
4.6
[45]
H4SiW12O40
Vis.
RhB (10)
1
480
45
[46]
H4SiW12O40/PVA
Vis.
RhB (10)
1
480
74
[46]
H4SiW12O40/PVA/Ag
Vis.
RhB (10)
1
480
100
[46]
(C16H36N)4(SiW12O40)-PVDF
UV
MO (15)
2 + 1.5 mM H2O2
510
97a
[47]
(SiW12O40)30%-zeolite (NH4Y)
UV
MO (26)
0.5 + 0.9 L/min air
240
73
[48]
(SiW12O40)30%-zeolite (ZSM5)
UV
MO (26)
0.5 + 0.9 L/min air
240
75
[48]
Ag@Ag4SiW12O40
Vis.
MO (20)
1.25
5
100
[49]
MFNs@SiO2@Ag4SiW12O40/Ag
Vis.
MB (3.2)
0.5
10
90a
[50]
SiW12O40-PANI-SnO2
Vis.b
RhB (4.8)
20
60
100a
[51]
H4SiW12O40/PVA/PMMA
UV
MO (10)
1c
30
95.1
[45]
H4SiW12O40/PVA
UV
MO (10)
1c
30
75.2
[45]
H4SiW12O40/PMMA
UV
MO (10)
1c
30
13.8
[52]
H4SiW12O40/PA6
UV
MO (10)
5
30
99.3
[53]
H4SiW12O40/TiO2/K2Ti6O13
UV
MO (10)
1
70
50a
[54]
MAC-HMT-STA-MB
Solar/Vis./UV
MB (40)
0.44
75
94.9/91.9/92.7
This work
MAC-HMT-STA-MB
Solar
MB (45) + RhB (8)
0.44
120
90.1 + 63.8
This work
MAC-HMT-STA-MB
Solar
MB (45) + MO (16)
0.44
75
91.0 + 59.0
This work
aValue was estimated from original figure of the reference; bhigh-voltage 250 W Hg lamp; c[H4SiW12O40] = 1 g/L. PVDF = poly(vinylidene fluoride); MFNs = magnesium ferrite nanoparticles; PANI = polyaniline; PVA = poly(vinyl alcohol); PMMA = poly(methyl methacrylate); PA6 = polycaprolactam.


## 4. Conclusions

In summary, a heterogeneous POM-based nanocomposite was successfully prepared by immobilization of the HMT-STA-MB hybrid on magnetic activated carbon nanoparticles as support. It exhibited photocatalytic activity in the degradation of MB, RhB, and MO organic dyes and their binary mixtures under sunlight, visible, or UV irradiation. The dyes are removed via combination of adsorption and photocatalytic degradation under light. The sunlight is able to degrade RhB and MO in the mixed solution in the presence of the composite, while it does not degrade alone RhB and MO. The degradation of the dyes proceeds through dye-sensitized degradation.This study proves that immobilization of POM species on MAC increases catalytic activity and facilitates separation from the solution by using an external magnetic field.



---

*Source: 8575096-2017-07-24.xml*