# Evaluation of the Wind Power in the State of Paraíba Using the Mesoscale Atmospheric Model Brazilian Developments on the Regional Atmospheric Modelling System

Authors: Francisco José Lopes de Lima; Enilson Palmeira Cavalcanti; Enio Pereira de Souza; Emerson Mariano da Silva
Journal: ISRN Renewable Energy
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

This work aims to describe the wind power density in five sites in the State of Paraiba, as well as to access the ability of the mesoscale atmospheric model Brazilian developments on the regional atmospheric modeling system (BRAMS) in describing the intensity of wind in São Gonçalo Monteiro, Patos, Campina Grande, and João Pessoa. Observational data are wind speed and direction at 10 m high, provided by the National Institute of Meteorology (INMET). We used the numerical model BRAMS in simulations for two different months. We ran the model for rainy months: March and April. It was concluded that the BRAMS model is able to satisfactorily reproduce the monthly cycle of the wind regime considered, as well as the main direction. However the model tends to underestimate the wind speed.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

As the using of wind power in the world grows, new technologies of generators and topology for wind power plants have been created in order to improve the utilization of energy from wind and its transmission. Numerical models of weather forecast are largely used in varied meteorological centers and find a range of applications in agriculture, water resources, tourism, and so forth. Forced by data and global models, it is common to local meteorological centers keeping systems of numerical forecast based on atmospheric models of limited area, with spatial resolutions of kilometers, typically.Some researches related to wind behavior are concentrated on the problem of adjustment of statistics distribution to data of wind speed ([1, 2] and others). Results of these researches also indicate the distribution of Weibull as the one that fits better to these data.According to Sauer et al. [3], Brazil offers excellent sites to install wind parks, and the best area is found along its coast. However, he indicates that in the countryside, particularly in northeast, where is located the State of Paraíba, there are found sites with capacity of wind power generation.Various numerical models of mesoscale such as (regional atmospheric modeling system) RAMS  described in Cotton et al. [4], (regional spectral model) RSM  described in Juang and Kanamitsu [5], and MM5 described in Duhdia et al. [6] solved physical processes from the surface to high atmosphere. These models are applied from the weather forecast to the measurement of pollutants dispersion.Among these, the (brazilian developments on the regional atmospheric modeling system) BRAMS model, developed from RAMS, whose basic structure is described by Pielke et al. [7]; Walko et al. [8]; and Cotton et al. [4]. However, an objective and brief description of this model can be found in Cavalcanti [9].This model has a complete and sophisticated set of physical parameterization to simulate the leading processes of the evolution of the atmospherical state. It contains in its code various options of physical parameterizations. Parameterizations: radiation proposed by Chen and Cotton [10], and of deep convection of Kuo type [11, 12], modified by Molinari [13] and Molinari and Corsetti [14], and the one by Grell and Dévényi [15] and other of shallow convection developed and implemented by Souza [16]. Turbulence on planetary limit layer is calculated according to Mellor and Yamada [17], and microphysics follow the scheme described by Walko et al. [8].In its more recent version the model counts with a parameterization for the photochemical processes on the atmosphere [18], besides the adequate treatment for urban areas by means of scheme (town energy budget) TEB, introduced in its version 4.3 of RAMS model [19].The general objective of this study is to evaluate the capacity of the numerical model BRAMS to simulate wind fields, aiming at the evaluation of wind power, in the State of Paraíba. Thus, it will be made an evaluation of wind power in the regions of São Gonçalo, Patos, Monteiro, Campina Grande, and João Pessoa, in State of Paraíba, using data observed and simulated by the regional model BRAMS, to generate primary maps of the wind power of the region.


## 2. Material and Methods

Data used in this research are clockwise observations of wind direction and speed, collected in five stations, located in the State of Paraíba, and they are meteorological stations of surface from Climatological Net of Northeast (RedeClimatológica do Nordeste) managed by the National Institute of Meteorology (Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia (INMET)). Sensors are at 10 meters high. The localization of the stations and its respective latitude, longitude, and height are shown in Table1.Table 1
Relation between the stations of surface from INMET and clockwise data of wind direction and speed to the State do Paraíba.
Site
Number synoptic
Latitude (S)
Longitude (W)
Height (m)
São Gonçalo
82698
6°50′
38°19′
235
Monteiro
82792
7°52′
37°07′
596
Patos
82791
7°01′
37°17′
250
Campina Grande
82795
7°13′
35°53′
508
João Pessoa
82798
7°07′
34°53′
5Numerical simulations were accomplished using the model BRAMS, aiming to evaluate the wind power in the State of Paraíba, in comparison to observational data. It was established two periods: March and April, 1977 and 1981, corresponding to the seasons of the year with less wind intensity, that is, the rainy period.In wind simulation with the BRAMS aiming at the wind power generation it is necessary to use high resolution. Thus, it was adopted two rails. The main rail that has a rectangular is of 80 points in directionx and 80 points in direction y, with a space of 16 km between each point of the rail, corresponding to an area that covers almost all northeast region: Ceará, Rio Grande do Norte, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Alagoas, Sergipe, and part of Bahia. And the rail nestled, located between the limits of the small rectangle, in blue, having 122 points in direction x and 66 points in direction y, with a space of 4 km between each one, corresponding to the region of Paraíba. The frequency of the analysis made by the model was standardized to clockwise intervals and with two rails having 9 degrees of soil layers. Figure 1 presents the view of the rails.Figure 1
Grid used80×80 points. Useful area for analysis: colorful area.All rails present polar stereographic projection and the same vertical structure, which consists of 42 degrees with enlargement reason of 1, 2, and a space of, at most, 1000 m. Lateral Newtonian relaxation is activated using 5 points, reaching 1800 s, or 30 min, as a constant value for all the simulated period. Top Newtonian relaxation has a scale of 21.600 s, or 6 h. The Newtonian relaxation in the interior of the domain reached the same value of the Newtonian relaxation of the top. For the parameterization of the radiation the scheme of Chen type is used. The parameterization of microphysics used is of the level 2 in the model. The parameterization of convection was also activated, being the Kuo type [11, 12, 21], the one chosen. For the parameterization of turbulent the scheme of Mellor-Yamada was chosen.To adjust data obtained by BRAMS (representative of the railed area) with the data observed (punctual) the statistic method was used, according to Reis Junior [22] that is based on the use of the mean and of the standard deviation of the series observed and simulated given as
(1)ϕci=(ϕi-ϕi¯)σoσi+ϕo¯,
where ϕi represents a value of the simulation, ϕ¯i the mean of the simulated values, σo the mean of the observed series, σi the standard deviation of the simulated series, and, finally, ϕ¯o represents the mean of the observational data.By the studies of Weber et al. [23], Maria [24], and Cunha [25], it is concluded that the best way to evaluate the model is using a set of statistic indexes, aiming to minimize interpretation mistakes. For this reason, in this work a set of 3 statistic indexes is used: mean absolute error, mean-square error and correction index.Mean absolute-error (EA) is given as(2)EA=1N∑i=1n|ϕi-ϕo|.By the definition, EA only can reach positive values; thus, the less is the value, the bigger is the similarity between the series. Mean square error (EQM) is given by the sum of the squares of the differences between the results of the model and the observations:(3)EQM=[1N∑i=1N(ϕi-ϕo)2]1/2.It can reach any positive value and has the same units of measurement of the series. The similarity of the simulated and observed series is bigger as the near of zero is the error measurement. In Table2 there is a more refined interpretation of the coefficient of correlation by Pearson.Table 2
Coefficient of statistics correction, or coefficient of correction by Pearson. Source: Devore [20].
Intervals
Definition
0.00 a 0.19
Very weak correlation
0.20 a 0.39
Weak correlation
0.40 a 0.69
Moderate correlation
0.70 a 0.89
Strong correlation
0.90 a 1.00
Very strong correlationThe value of a correlation coefficient is not a guarantee that the variables involved are really correlated although before any conclusions about the values of the correlation coefficients, the application of a statistical test is necessary in order to know the real degree of relation between the variable analyzed. In order to test the equality between two means, Student’st-test by is largely used [26, 27]. The test of significance t by Student was applied having the following parameterization values, t:
(4)t=rN-21-r2,
where N is the number of data.From (4) the critical coefficient of correlation (rc) was extracted, that is, a value which accepts or not the statistical hypothesis, rc, given by
(5)rc=t2(N-2)+t2.In this work the variable used has a series of data of 31 and 30 days, respectively. The critical correlation indexesrc will be calculated.For the correlationN=31, that is, 31 days corresponding to the month of March, N-2=29, which are the degrees of freedom. So the values of t and rc are(a)
for 99% of significance, that is, with an error of 1% (α=0.01), t=2.462; rc=0.42;(b)
for 95% of significance, that is, with an error of 5% (α=0.05), t=1.699; rc=0.30;(c)
for 90% of significance, that is, with an error of 10% (α=0.10), t=1.311; rc=0.24.For the correlation N=30, that is, 30 days corresponding to the month of April, N-2=28, which are the degrees of freedom. So the values of t and rc are(i)
for 99% of significance, that is, with an error of 1% (α=0.01), t=2.467; rc=0.42;(ii)
for 95% of significance, that is, with an error of 5% (α=0.05), t=1.701; rc=0.30;(iii)
for 90% of significance, that is, with an error of 10% (α=0.10), t=1.313; rc=0.24.It means that, for the correlation coefficients obtained with 29 and 28 degrees of freedom, the statistical significance that shows the correlation between the variables is of 99%, 95%, and 90%, forr equal or superior to 0.42, 0.30, and 0.24, respectively.The result obtained can suggest the acceptance of the hypothesis of null coefficient or not. In case of the correlation coefficient calculated is equal or superior to the value oft critical for a determined degree of freedom the percentage of significance, the null hypothesis is rejected, and the trend observed is true for that degree of significance obtained [27, 28].


## 3. Results of the Simulations

From Figures2 to 6 the time series of wind speed are shown, in a height of 10 m. A comparison between the data observed and simulated by the model of mesoscale BRAMS is made, as well as the graphics in which were done the statistic corrections of the simulated data, for the referred sites. In Monteiro data observed only for the month of March, 1981 were recorded. In Figures (a) and (b), the comparisons between the data observed and the data of the simulation are represented, without statistical correction. In Figures (c) and (d), there are the data observed and the data simulated by the model with statistical correction.Comparison between the wind speed at 10 m high in (m/s), in months of March and April, from the observed data (solid line)  and the simulated data  (dashed line), for the city of São Gonçalo, (a) year 1977, (b) year 1977 with statistic correction, (c) year 1981, and (d) year 1981 with statistic correction.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)In Figure2 is observed a correlation between the values of mean speed simulated and observed. In general, for the city of São Gonçalo the model overestimates the series of data observed in the year of 1977, Figure 2(a) with an inversion at the end of March and beginning of April. In the year of 1981, Figure 2(c), the model underestimates for the month of March and overestimates the month of April.  A cycle well defined in 1981 in relation to 1977 can be observed, where a greater correlation is expected. In Figures 2(b) and 2(d) there are the graphics with the statistic corrections for the years 1977 and 1981, respectively, where it is shown a close relation between the simulated data and the observed data.In Figure3 it is observed that there is a correlation between the values of speed simulated and speed observed in all the period studied. In general, for the city of Monteiro, the model represents well the monthly cycle of March, 1981, Figure 3(c). There are not recorded data for the months of March and April, 1977, and April, 1981. The results show a slight underestimation in this period.Comparison between the wind speed at 10 m high in (m/s), in months of March and April, from the observed data (solid line) and the simulated data (dashed line), for the city of Monteiro, (c) year 1981 and (d) year 1981 with statistical correction.In Figure4, for the city of Patos, it is observed that the simulated data follows a monthly cycle well defined, where it can be observed that, for the months of March and April of 1977, Figure 4(a), and 1981, Figure 4(c), the model underestimates the observational data, but follows a cycle well defined in comparison to the data observed. In Figures 4(b) and 4(d) it is observed that there is a correlation between the simulated and corrected speed values and the ones observed in all this period. Maybe this happens due to the reconfiguration of the limit layer, due to the rainy period.Comparison between the wind speed at 10 m high in (m/s), in months of March and April, from the data observed (solid line) and the simulated data (dashed line), for the city of Patos, (a) year 1977, (b) year 1977 with statistical correction, (c) year 1981 and (d) year 1981 with statistical correction.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)In Figure5, related to Campina Grande, it can be seen that in March 1977 there is an interruption in the cycle when compared to the month of April, Figure 5(a), where it can be noted, especially in the first quarter of March, that there is a sharp reduction of the wind. For the month of April, still in Figure 5(a), it is observed that the simulated data follow a cycle well defined in relation to the observed data. It is observed that, for the month of March, 1981, Figure 5(c), the model underestimates the observational data, as well as the ones observed in all the period of March and April 1971, but with a cycle more defined for the month of March in comparison to April of the same year. It can be said that the model simulated well the month of March, 1981 for this region. In Figures 5(b) and 5(d) there are the statistical corrections, where it is shown the adjustment of the simulated data to the observed data.Comparison between the wind speed at 10 m high in (m/s), in months of March and April, from the data observed (solid line)  and the simulated data (dashed line), for the city of Campina Grande, (a) year 1977, (b) year 1977 with statistical correction, (c) year 1981 and (d) year 1981 with statistical correction.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Comparison between the wind speed at 10 m high in (m/s), in months of March and April, from the data observed (solid line) and the simulated data (dashed line), for the city of João Pessoa, (a) year 1977, (b) year 1977 with statistical correction, (c) year 1981, and (d) year 1981 with statistical correction.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)In Figure6, it is observed in João Pessoa the lack of a cycle well defined for the month of March 1977 and the existence of a monthly cycle a little more defined for the month of April of the same year, in Figure 6(a). For the year 1981, Figure 6(c), in March, there is a monthly cycle well defined, but, for the month of April of the same year, it can be observed the lack of a monthly cycle. In João Pessoa, it was verified that the simulated data in 1977 and 1981 underestimates the observational data for the month of March. And there is variability in April in relation to the overestimation and underestimation. In Figures 6(b) and 6(d) are observed the statistical corrections of the model that adjusted well to the observational data in this region.Aiming to evaluate the performance of the results of the simulations between the series of data simulated by the model of mesoscale BRAMS and the data observed, the statistical indexes that can be seen on Tables3 and 4 were obtained.Table 3
Statistical indexes for wind speed in São Gonçalo, Monteiro, Patos, Campina Grande, and João Pessoa, where EA is the mean absolute error, EQN is the mean square error, andr is the correlation for the period of March 1977 and 1981.
March/1977
March/1981
EA
EQM
r
EA
EQM
r
São Gonçalo
0.61
0.70
0.27***
0.53
0.62
0.83*
Monteiro
—
—
—
0.69
0.81
0.81*
Patos
0.83
0.96
0.40**
1.49
1.66
0.90*
Campina Grande
2.56
2.62
0.39**
1.89
2.03
0.79*
João Pessoa
0.64
0.74
0.36**
0.94
1.17
0.66*
*Significance to the degree of 99%, **significance to the degree of 95%,
***significance to the degree of 90%.Table 4
Statistical indexes for wind speed in São Gonçalo, Monteiro, Patos, Campina Grande, and João Pessoa, where EA is the absolute error, EQM is the mean absolute error, andr is the correlation for the period of April 1977 and 1981.
April/1977
April/1981
EA
EQM
r
EA
EQM
r
São Gonçalo
0.59
0.70
0.50*
0.76
0.89
0.62*
Monteiro
—
—
—
—
—
—
Patos
0.67
0.79
0.62*
1.00
1.12
0.70*
Campina Grande
1.33
1.51
0.59*
1.14
1.29
0.41**
João Pessoa
0.57
0.68
0.64*
0.61
0.74
0.47*
*Significance to the degree of 99%, **significance to the degree of 95%,
***significance to the degree of 90%.It is observed that, for the values for absolute error and mean square error, the best values are the ones nearer to zero. Analyzing the month of March, 1977, it is observed that the best value for the absolute error was found in São Gonçalo station, with 0.61 m/s, while Campina Grande had a value much higher for the absolute error, with 2.56 m/s. In relation to the same period, but in the year of 1981, in the case of the absolute error, the best site continues to be São Gonçalo, with 0.53 m/s, and the worst value was, again, found in Campina Grande. For the mean square error, in 1977, the best result was in São Gonçalo and the worst in Capinha Grande, with 0.70 m/s and 2.62 m/s, respectively, and the same happens in the year of 1981, with values equal to 0.62 m/s for São Gonçalo and 2.03 m/s for Campina Grande.Observing the correlation coefficient it can be said that the best results were found for the year of 1981. Probably, a factor that determined this was the quality of the observational data, which could have been better in relation to the ones of the year 1977. The correlations for the year 1981 presented very strong, strong, and moderate coefficients. Using the testt by Student, it is observed that, for the year 1981, all the correlation coefficients present statistical significance for the degree of significance of 99%, while, for the year of 1977, in March, São Gonçalo station presented statistical significance for the degree of significance 90%. The other sites present statistical significance for the degree of significance of 95%.Analyzing the months of April 1977 and 1981, Table4, it is observed that the best value for the absolute error was found in João Pessoa station, for the year of 1977, with 0.57 m/s, while Campina Grande obtained the higher value, with 1.33 m/s. In the same period, but in 1981, in the case of the absolute error, the best site continues to be João Pessoa, with 0.61 m/s, and the worst value, again, was found in Campina Grande, with 1.14 m/s. It can be observed that, for both the months of March and April, in the two years studied, the Campina Grande station obtained higher values of absolute errors. For the mean square error, the best result continues to be in João Pessoa, for the year of 1977, followed by São Gonçalo, Patos, and Campina Grande. In Monteiro were not recorded observational data. The same happens in 1981.Observing the correlation coefficient, it can be said that the results, both in 1977 and 1981, in the month referred, were close. The correlations for the year of 1977 present moderate coefficients in all stations, while, in 1981, all stations obtained moderate correlations, as was observed in 1977. Using the testt by Student, it is observed that for the year 1977 all the correlation coefficients presented statistical significance, to the degree of significance of 99%, while in 1981, for the month of April, the Campina Grande station presented statistical significance to the degree of significance of 95%. The other sites present statistical significance to the degree of significance of 99%.In relation to the wind direction studied, graphics of the Compass Rose was constructed, from Figures7 to 11, for the five sites, in the period of March, April, September, and October, and a qualitative comparison is made between the direction in the observational period and the period of the simulation, to identify if the model simulated well the sites studied, in relation to the variable direction. In Figure 7, it is observed that, along the period studied, 1977 and 1981, the wind was predominantly east, varying from 45° to 135°, that is, varying from northeast to southeast. In North direction, it is observed that there is a high percentage for the São Gonçalo station, probably due to problems in obtaining the data, or calm. The higher percentages of wind speed occurred in the rate from 3.6 m/s to 5.7 m/s. A resemblance can be observed between the simulated and observed data, especially in 1981.Compass rose, speed, and direction of wind at 10 m high from the surface for the months of March, April, September, and October measured in São Gonçalo: (a) observational data for the year 1977, (b) simulated data for the year 1977, (c) observational data for the year 1981, and (d) simulated data for the year 1981.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)In Figure8, it can be observed that wind was predominantly east, varying from 45° to 135°, that is, varying from northeast to southeast, as observed in São Gonçalo. In north direction a high percentage for the observational data for the year of 1981 is verified, Figure 8(c), probably due to problems in obtaining data or calm. The higher percentages of wind speed occurred in the rate from 3.6 m/s to 5.7 m/s and 5.7 m/s to 8.8 m/s. It can be observed that there is a resemblance between the simulated and observed data, that is, in both São Gonçalo and Monteiro stations the model seems to be simulated well the wind direction.Compass rose, speed, and direction of wind at 10 m high from the surface for the months of March, April, September, and October measured in Monteiro: (a) observational data for the year 1977, (b) simulated data for the year 1977, (c) observational data for the year 1981, and (d) simulated data for the year 1981.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)In Figure9, it is observed that wind was predominantly east, varying from 90° to 135°, that is, varying from east to southeast. In north direction, it is observed that there is a high percentage for the observational data, for the year of 1977, Figure 9(a). The higher percentage of wind speed occurred in the rate from 2.1 m/s to 3.6 m/s and 3.6 m/s to 5.7 m/s, and it can be observed that there is a resemblance between the simulated and observed data.Compass rose, speed, and direction of wind at 10 m high from the surface for the months of March, April, September, and October measured in Patos: (a) observational data for the year 1977, (b) simulated data for the year 1977, (c) observational data for the year 1981, and (d) simulated data for the year 1981.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)In Figure10 is the Campina Grande station, where the wind were predominantly east, varying from 45° to 135°, that is, varying from northeast to southeast, for the observational data, Figures 10(a) and 10(c), while for the data simulated by the model the wind was predominantly southeast, varying from east to southeast. The higher percentages of wind speed occurred in rates from 2.1 m/s to 3.6 m/s, 3.6 m/s to 5.7 m/s, and 5.7 m/s to 8.8 m/s. It can be observed that there is a resemblance between the simulated data and the observed data, having in mind that the observational data only reach exact values, such as 0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, 180°, 225°, 270°, 315° and, at last, 360°, while the model can reach any value between 0° and 360°.Compass rose, speed, and direction of wind at 10 m high from the surface for the months of March, April, September, and October measured in Campina Grande: (a) observational data for the year 1977, (b) simulated data for the year 1977, (c) observational data for the year 1981, and (d) simulated data for the year 1981.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Compass rose, speed, and direction of wind at 10 m high from the surface for the months of March and April measured in João Pessoa: (a) observational data for the year 1977, (b) simulated data for the year 1977, (c) observational data for the year 1981, and (d) simulated data for the year 1981.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)In Figure11 is the João Pessoa station where the wind was predominantly southeast, varying from 90° to 180°, that is, varying from east to southeast. The higher percentages of wind speed occurred in rates from 2.1 m/s to 3.6 m/s, 3.6 m/s to 5.7 m/s, and 5.7 m/s to 8.8 m/s. It can be observed that there is a resemblance between the simulated and observed data. It is important to highlight that, in order to have a better notion in relation to the adjustment between the observational data and the data simulated by the model, it is necessary to have a quantitative analysis of the data. Thus, it is necessary to use the statistics indexes described in the methodology of this research.In Figures12 and 13 there is the map of the State of Paraíba for the mean wind power density with the localization of the stations used for the period considered rainy in the region, that is, in the months of March and April, Figure 12, and for the dry period in the region, that is, for the months of September and October, Figure 13, in years 1977 and 1981.Mean wind power density in (W/m²) for the State of Paraíba for the following period: (a) March 1977, (b) March 1981, (c) April 1977, and (d) April 1981.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Mean wind power density in (W/m²) for the State of Paraíba for the following periods: (a) September 1977, (b) September 1981, (c) October 1977 and (d) October 1981.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)It can be observed in Figure12 that the higher values of density of wind power were found in the mesoregion of Planalto da Borborema, where there are the Monteiro and Campina Grande stations. It is also possible to verify that for the month of March the higher values were in the year of 1977, while for the month of April the higher values were found in 1981.In Figure13 there is the configuration of the State of Paraíba for the density of wind power in W/m². As expected, the period considered dry obtained the best configuration for the wind power, in the region, in relation to the period considered rainy; that is, the results for the months of September and October were superior to the results observed in the months of March and April, as can be seen comparing Figure 12 to the Figure 13. The best sites for wind power density were again in Planalto da Borborema, as observed in the previous graphic, but with some focus in the shore of the State where there is the João Pessoa station, and in the Sertão region of the State of Paraíba, where there are the São Gonçalo and Patos stations.


## 4. Conclusions

It was concluded that the numerical simulations to estimate the wind speed at 10 m high distant from the soil showed, in general, a satisfactory performance with good relation between the series of simulated data, in comparison to the observational data. And, as seen in the statistical indexes with high correlation for the rainy period, that is, the model simulated well the period considered rainy in the region.In all cases, the model had difficulty in reproducing the variation of a short-time scale. Thus, it can be concluded that the local factors are not well represented in the model, what could be corrected with the utilization of a microscale model. As well as the use of surface data from different sources from the ones used in this research, having better spatial resolutions and high quality.In further works in this line of investigation, wind power provision, it is proposed the use of a model of microscale, as the WASP, in order to detect the phenomena that occur in short-time intervals, as well as the use of better surface data in the model BRAMS, to redo the simulations, amplifying the simulation period. Data of great scale of varying sources to initialize the model can also be used.



---

*Source: 847356-2012-10-16.xml*