# Phenolic Compounds, Antioxidant Activity, and Other Characteristics of Extra Virgin Olive Oils from Italian Autochthonous VarietiesTonda di Villacidro,Tonda di Cagliari,Semidana, andBosana

Authors: Carlo I. G. Tuberoso; Igor Jerković; Marialuce Maldini; Gabriele Serreli
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

Extra virgin olive oils (EVOOs) from the fruits of Italian autochthonous varietiesTonda di Villacidro,Tonda di Cagliari,Semidana, andBosana were investigated to promote their quality aspects. All the analyzed EVOOs showed low values of acidity (≤0.45%) and of peroxide value (≤6.22 mEq O2/kg). There were no relevant differences in fatty acids and triacylglycerols composition among the four EVOOs. Tocopherols determined by HPLC-FL revealed thatBosana oil was characterized by the highest α-tocopherol level (213.3 ± 55.4 mg/kg). Chlorophylls, carotenoids, and total phenol (TP) contents as well as antioxidant activity (FRAP, DPPH∙, and ABTS∙+ assays) of the oils hydrophilic fractions (HFs) were assessed by spectrophotometric methods. Some differences concerning the antioxidant activity and the TP content were observed:Bosana oil HF activity was the most pronounced (1.17 ± 0.37 mmol TEAC/kg) and it contained the highest TPs amount (335.20 ± 121.34 mg/kg). HFs phenolic composition was determined by HPLC-DAD. The main identified phenols were secoiridoids, dominating inBosana oil, such as decarboxymethyl ligstroside aglycone (p-HPEA-EDA, 35.8 ± 19.9 mg/kg) and oleuropein aglycone (3,4-HPEA-EA up to 84.7 mg/kg). In summary, all the four varieties showed good characteristics for the use as quality EVOO.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) is a worldwide recognised high valuable food product and there are constant efforts to enhance its quality and to preserve it from adulteration. In the last decades, several analyses to identify different olive oil cultivars and to verify the presence of any adulteration have been developed [1, 2]. The quality of olive oil is directly connected with the variety of the olives and there is a strong link between the cultivar and the territory of cultivation [3, 4]. Extra virgin olive oil from Sardinia (Italy) is protected by the European Union “Protected Designation of Origin” (PDO “Sardegna”) and it can be obtained from several autochthonous olives asTonda di Villacidro,Tonda di Cagliari (also known asNera di Gonnos),Semidana, andBosana [5]. More than 20 cultivars were defined so far in Sardinia and wild olive forms are still widely represented [6]. Archaeological evidence proves that olive oil extraction was performed in ancient times, long before different olive cultivars were introduced by Phoenicians, Romans, and Spanish peoples [6]. The PDO “Sardegna” was created mainly to promote the sensory properties, but also to preserve the health benefits of the most typical olive oils of the region. The EVOOs obtained fromTonda di Villacidro,Tonda di Cagliari,Semidana, andBosana have specific sensory characteristics and a long tradition in Sardinia [6–9]. Good yield and quality were observed inSemidana andBosana for oil production, whileTonda di Cagliari resulted as interesting dual-purpose cultivars [7]. Some data on the physical-chemical parameters of these monovarietal oils can be found in scientific databases. TheBosana cultivar has been shown to have a high content of phenolic compounds [10]. Nevertheless, data in the main Sardinian EVOO are fragmentary and, to the best of our knowledge, no data onTonda di Villacidro has been published so far.The aim of this paper is to perform a chemical characterization ofTonda di Villacidro,Tonda di Cagliari,Semidana, andBosana EVOOs by (1) determination of basic technological characteristics (acidity, peroxide value,K
232, andK
270) according to EU regulations; (2) the fatty acids (GC-FID/MS) and triacylglycerols profiles (HPLC-DAD); (3) total phenols, chlorophylls, and carotenoids evaluation by UV/vis including targeted tocopherols analysis by HPLC-FL; (4) HPLC-DAD targeted phenolics analysis of the hydrophilic oil fractions (HFs) and assessing of the HFs antioxidant activity (with DPPH∙, ABTS∙+, and FRAP assays).


## 2. Material and Methods

### 2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

All chemicals and solvents used in this study were of analytical grade. Methanol,n-hexane, ethylacetate, acetonitrile, chloroform, gallic acid, sodium carbonate, sodium chloride and potassium hydroxide α-tocopherol, γ-tocopherol, squalene, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox), Folin-Ciocalteu’s reagent, β-carotene, and chlorophyll a were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Milan, Italy). Primary reference standard (purity > 99.9%) of phenolic compounds, triacylglycerols, and fatty acids methyl esters were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, Merck, and Carlo Erba (Milan, Italy). Ultrapure water (18 MΩ·cm) was obtained with a Milli-Q Advantage A10 System apparatus (Millipore, Milan, Italy).


### 2.2. Olive Oil Samples and Hydrophilic Fraction Extraction

Extra virgin olive oils (n
=
61) fromTonda di Villacidro (n
=
15),Tonda di Cagliari (n
=
14),Semidana (n
=
14), andBosana (n
=
18) cultivar were obtained from olive fruits by local groves in Sardinia (Italy) in the years 2013-2014. Four batches of healthy olive fruits (each ca. 200 kg) were harvested in the same ripening index (RI = 4.3 ± 0.2) [11], processed within 24 h to olive oils, and stored in dark glass bottles at 12 ± 1°C until analysis. Sensory analysis of the samples was performed under the conditions described within the EC Regulation 640/2008 [12] and the samples were analyzed within 3 months from their production. Hydrophilic fractions (HFs) of the oils were prepared as reported by Tuberoso et al. [13].


### 2.3. Determination of Oil Technological Parameters

Free acidity (% of oleic acid (%18 : 1)), peroxide value (mEq O2/kg of the oil), and UV absorption characteristics (K
232 andK
270) were determined according to the European Union Commission Regulations EC 1989/2003 [14].K
232 andK
270 were determined using 1% solution of the oil in cyclohexane with an UV-visible spectrophotometer Varian Cary 50 (Varian, Leini, TO, Italy) at 232 and 270 nm in a 10 mm quartz cuvette. All parameters were determined in triplicate for each sample.


### 2.4. Fatty Acids and Squalene

A transmethylation technique followed by GC-FID/MS determination was used [13, 15]. The percentage composition of the oils was calculated from GC peak areas without using correction factors. The quantitative analysis of squalene was performed using the internal standard method (with squalane) and results were expressed as mg squalene/kg of sample.


### 2.5. Triacylglycerols

The analysis of triacylglycerols (TAG) was performed with an HPLC-UV method [13]. Calibration graphs were constructed with the external standard method by measuring peak area versus concentration (r = 0.9982–0.9997). The concentrations of the compounds were calculated in mg/kg and data were expressed in weight percentages. Standard solutions of LLL, LLO, LLP, OOL, POL, OOO, OOP, PPO, and OOS were prepared in acetone. The use of equivalent carbon number (ECN = C
N
-
2
n, where CN is the number of carbon atoms and n is the number of double bonds) allowed the attribution of compounds of which no analytical standards were found. In this way LnLL, LnLno, LnLnLn, LLnLn, OLLn, PLLn, OOLn, POLn, LPP, PSL, and SSLn were identified and the quantification was performed using the calibration curves of the TAG standard with the closest chemical structure and ECN number.


### 2.6. Targeted Phenolic Compounds Analysis

Detection and quantitative analyses of HF phenolic compounds were carried out using a LC-DAD method as described by Šarolić et al. [15]. Calibration curves were constructed with the external standard method, correlating the area of the peaks with the concentration. All compounds were dosed using the calibration curve built with the respective standard, except oleuropein and ligstroside derivatives that were dosed using oleuropein calibration curve. The correlation values were comprised between 0.9993 and 0.9998. Oleuropein and ligstroside derivatives and acetoxypinoresinol were tentatively identified by comparison with literature data [16–18].


### 2.7. Determination of Tocopherols, Total Chlorophylls, and Carotenoids

An HPLC system connected to a spectrofluorometer detector was used to doseα- and γ-tocopherols [15]. Standard solutions were prepared in acetone, while working solutions were prepared to appropriate dilution with the eluent mobile phase. Linearity in the range 0.1–6 mg/kg was 0.9998. Total chlorophylls and carotenoids were estimated spectrophotometrically reading the absorbances at two different wavelengths (464 nm for carotenoids and 669 nm for chlorophylls) [14]. Chlorophyll a and β-carotene stock standard solutions were prepared in acetone, as well as working solutions, which were prepared with proper dilutions (0.1–2.0 mg/kg, r
=
0.9996, and 0.02–0.50 mg/kg, r
=
0.9995, for chlorophyll a and β-carotene, resp.).


### 2.8. Determination of Total Phenolic Content (Folin-Ciocalteu’s Assay)

Total phenolic content of the HF was estimated spectrophotometrically with modified Folin-Ciocalteu’s method [19]. The total polyphenol content results, expressed as mg/kg of gallic acid equivalent (GAE), were obtained using a calibration curve of a freshly prepared gallic acid standard solution (5–100 mg/kg, r
=
0.9998).


### 2.9. Free Radical Scavenging Activity (DPPH∙ and ABTS∙+ Assays) and Total Antioxidant Activity (FRAP Assay)

The in vitro HF antiradical activity was assessed with the DPPH∙ spectrophotometric method and the obtained data were expressed as Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) [15]. A Trolox calibration curve in the range 0.02–1.00 mM was prepared (r
=
0.9998), and data were expressed in Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC, mmol/kg). The ABTS assay was performed according to Re et al. [20] with slight modification [19], and data were expressed as TEAC values. The FRAP assay was performed preparing a ferric complex TPTZ and Fe3+ [19–21]. Quantitative analysis was performed according to the external standard method (FeSO4, 0.1–2.0 mmol/kg, r
=
0.9999), correlating the absorbance with the concentration, and results were expressed as mmol/kg of Fe2+.


## 2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

All chemicals and solvents used in this study were of analytical grade. Methanol,n-hexane, ethylacetate, acetonitrile, chloroform, gallic acid, sodium carbonate, sodium chloride and potassium hydroxide α-tocopherol, γ-tocopherol, squalene, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox), Folin-Ciocalteu’s reagent, β-carotene, and chlorophyll a were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Milan, Italy). Primary reference standard (purity > 99.9%) of phenolic compounds, triacylglycerols, and fatty acids methyl esters were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, Merck, and Carlo Erba (Milan, Italy). Ultrapure water (18 MΩ·cm) was obtained with a Milli-Q Advantage A10 System apparatus (Millipore, Milan, Italy).


## 2.2. Olive Oil Samples and Hydrophilic Fraction Extraction

Extra virgin olive oils (n
=
61) fromTonda di Villacidro (n
=
15),Tonda di Cagliari (n
=
14),Semidana (n
=
14), andBosana (n
=
18) cultivar were obtained from olive fruits by local groves in Sardinia (Italy) in the years 2013-2014. Four batches of healthy olive fruits (each ca. 200 kg) were harvested in the same ripening index (RI = 4.3 ± 0.2) [11], processed within 24 h to olive oils, and stored in dark glass bottles at 12 ± 1°C until analysis. Sensory analysis of the samples was performed under the conditions described within the EC Regulation 640/2008 [12] and the samples were analyzed within 3 months from their production. Hydrophilic fractions (HFs) of the oils were prepared as reported by Tuberoso et al. [13].


## 2.3. Determination of Oil Technological Parameters

Free acidity (% of oleic acid (%18 : 1)), peroxide value (mEq O2/kg of the oil), and UV absorption characteristics (K
232 andK
270) were determined according to the European Union Commission Regulations EC 1989/2003 [14].K
232 andK
270 were determined using 1% solution of the oil in cyclohexane with an UV-visible spectrophotometer Varian Cary 50 (Varian, Leini, TO, Italy) at 232 and 270 nm in a 10 mm quartz cuvette. All parameters were determined in triplicate for each sample.


## 2.4. Fatty Acids and Squalene

A transmethylation technique followed by GC-FID/MS determination was used [13, 15]. The percentage composition of the oils was calculated from GC peak areas without using correction factors. The quantitative analysis of squalene was performed using the internal standard method (with squalane) and results were expressed as mg squalene/kg of sample.


## 2.5. Triacylglycerols

The analysis of triacylglycerols (TAG) was performed with an HPLC-UV method [13]. Calibration graphs were constructed with the external standard method by measuring peak area versus concentration (r = 0.9982–0.9997). The concentrations of the compounds were calculated in mg/kg and data were expressed in weight percentages. Standard solutions of LLL, LLO, LLP, OOL, POL, OOO, OOP, PPO, and OOS were prepared in acetone. The use of equivalent carbon number (ECN = C
N
-
2
n, where CN is the number of carbon atoms and n is the number of double bonds) allowed the attribution of compounds of which no analytical standards were found. In this way LnLL, LnLno, LnLnLn, LLnLn, OLLn, PLLn, OOLn, POLn, LPP, PSL, and SSLn were identified and the quantification was performed using the calibration curves of the TAG standard with the closest chemical structure and ECN number.


## 2.6. Targeted Phenolic Compounds Analysis

Detection and quantitative analyses of HF phenolic compounds were carried out using a LC-DAD method as described by Šarolić et al. [15]. Calibration curves were constructed with the external standard method, correlating the area of the peaks with the concentration. All compounds were dosed using the calibration curve built with the respective standard, except oleuropein and ligstroside derivatives that were dosed using oleuropein calibration curve. The correlation values were comprised between 0.9993 and 0.9998. Oleuropein and ligstroside derivatives and acetoxypinoresinol were tentatively identified by comparison with literature data [16–18].


## 2.7. Determination of Tocopherols, Total Chlorophylls, and Carotenoids

An HPLC system connected to a spectrofluorometer detector was used to doseα- and γ-tocopherols [15]. Standard solutions were prepared in acetone, while working solutions were prepared to appropriate dilution with the eluent mobile phase. Linearity in the range 0.1–6 mg/kg was 0.9998. Total chlorophylls and carotenoids were estimated spectrophotometrically reading the absorbances at two different wavelengths (464 nm for carotenoids and 669 nm for chlorophylls) [14]. Chlorophyll a and β-carotene stock standard solutions were prepared in acetone, as well as working solutions, which were prepared with proper dilutions (0.1–2.0 mg/kg, r
=
0.9996, and 0.02–0.50 mg/kg, r
=
0.9995, for chlorophyll a and β-carotene, resp.).


## 2.8. Determination of Total Phenolic Content (Folin-Ciocalteu’s Assay)

Total phenolic content of the HF was estimated spectrophotometrically with modified Folin-Ciocalteu’s method [19]. The total polyphenol content results, expressed as mg/kg of gallic acid equivalent (GAE), were obtained using a calibration curve of a freshly prepared gallic acid standard solution (5–100 mg/kg, r
=
0.9998).


## 2.9. Free Radical Scavenging Activity (DPPH∙ and ABTS∙+ Assays) and Total Antioxidant Activity (FRAP Assay)

The in vitro HF antiradical activity was assessed with the DPPH∙ spectrophotometric method and the obtained data were expressed as Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) [15]. A Trolox calibration curve in the range 0.02–1.00 mM was prepared (r
=
0.9998), and data were expressed in Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC, mmol/kg). The ABTS assay was performed according to Re et al. [20] with slight modification [19], and data were expressed as TEAC values. The FRAP assay was performed preparing a ferric complex TPTZ and Fe3+ [19–21]. Quantitative analysis was performed according to the external standard method (FeSO4, 0.1–2.0 mmol/kg, r
=
0.9999), correlating the absorbance with the concentration, and results were expressed as mmol/kg of Fe2+.


## 3. Results and Discussion

EVOOs quality parameters (free acidity, peroxide value, and UV absorption characteristicsK
232 andK
270) were determined according to the analytical methods described in the European Union Commission Regulations EEC/2568/91 and EEC/1429/92 [22, 23]. Table 1 shows that all the analyzed EVOOs exhibit low average values of acidity (≤0.45%), peroxide value (≤6.22 mEq O2/kg), andK
232/K
270 absorption (≤2.13 and ≤0.15, resp.), prerequisite for the commercial category “extra virgin” olive oil, according to European Union regulations (EEC Regulation 2568/91) [22]. These values meet also the requirement of the PDO “Sardegna” production specification [5].Table 1
Technological characteristics ofTonda di Villacidro, Tonda di Cagliari, Semidana, and Bosana EVOO.
Fatty acid
Tonda di Villacidro
Tonda di Cagliari
Semidana
Bosana
Area [%]
Area [%]
Area [%]
Area [%]
Min
Max
Mean
±SD
Min
Max
Mean
±SD
Min
Max
Mean
±SD
Min
Max
Mean
±SD
Aciditya (%)
0.14
0.61
0.43
0.19
0.12
0.58
0.45
0.19
0.12
0.53
0.37
0.14
0.15
0.59
0.41
0.18
Peroxide valueb (mEq O2/kg)
3.37
6.49
4.73
1.97
2.11
5.62
3.47
2.02
3.97
7.11
5.45
2.16
4.52
7.65
6.22
1.36
K
232
c
1.98
2.24
2.13
0.11
1.80
1.83
1.81
0.02
1.95
2.11
2.03
0.11
1.85
2.25
2.06
0.13
K
270
d
0.09
0.14
0.12
0.02
0.08
0.14
0.11
0.03
0.13
0.16
0.15
0.02
0.13
0.18
0.15
0.01
aThreshold value for EVOO is ≤0.8; bthreshold value for EVOO is ≤20; cthreshold value for EVOO is ≤2.5; dthreshold value for EVOO is ≤0.22 [EEC Regulation 2568/91].The analysis of fatty acids and triacylglycerols allowed finding in EVOO 13 fatty acids and 16 different triacylglycerols. Table2 shows the fatty acid composition ofTonda di Villacidro,Tonda di Cagliari,Semidana, andBosana EVOO. No significant differences were observed between these oils concerning the amount of each quantified fatty acid, and among these oleic, palmitic, and linoleic acid were the most concentrated, consistent with other previously published data [24, 25].Bosana oil showed a slightly higher amount of oleic acid (66.4 ± 3.0%): this is reflected in the analysis of triacylglycerols content (Table 3), which consists mostly in OOO, POO, and LOO, in all the EVOO samples, but in particular in that ofBosana variety.Table 2
Fatty acid composition ofTonda di Villacidro, Tonda di Cagliari, Semidana, and Bosana EVOO (%, w/w).
Tonda di Villacidro
Tonda di Cagliari
Semidana
Bosana
Fatty acid
Area [%]
Area [%]
Area [%]
Area [%]
Min
Max
Mean
±SD
Min
Max
Mean
±SD
Min
Max
Mean
±SD
Min
Max
Mean
±SD
M
Myristic (C14:0)
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.1
P
Palmitic (C16:0)
14.9
16.8
15.8
0.7
13.3
17.5
15.7
1.1
14.1
16.1
15.2
0.6
11.1
16.0
14.1
1.1
Po
Palmitoleic (C16:1n-7)
1.0
1.4
1.2
0.2
0.8
1.7
1.2
0.3
1.0
1.3
1.1
0.2
0.1
5.1
3.2
1.8
Ea
Heptadecanoic (C17:0)
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.0
tr
0.2
0.1
0.0
S
Stearic (C18:0)
1.9
2.9
2.3
0.3
1.6
2.4
2.0
0.2
1.8
2.5
2.2
0.3
1.1
3.0
2.2
0.4
O
Oleic (C18:1n-9)
55.2
65.5
60.7
3.3
53.8
69.5
61.0
3.4
58.3
66.0
62.0
2.5
59.8
73.4
66.4
3.0
V
Vaccenic (C18:1n-7)
2.3
3.3
3.0
0.3
1.9
3.5
2.7
0.4
2.5
3.2
2.9
0.3
1.5
3.4
2.5
0.4
L
Linoleic (C18:2n-6)
10.8
19.8
15.5
3.0
9.9
22.1
15.5
2.4
12.4
17.4
15.1
2.0
9.1
17.0
12.5
1.8
Ln
Linolenic (C18:3n-3)
0.6
9.0
3.0
3.5
0.4
0.8
0.6
0.1
0.7
1.0
0.9
0.1
0.4
1.0
0.7
0.1
A
Arachidic (C20:0)
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.7
0.4
0.1
Ec
Eicosenoic (C20:1n-11)
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.2
0.1
Be
Behenic (C22:0)
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.7
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.5
0.1
0.1
Lg
Lignoceric (C24:0)
tr
0.2
0.1
0.1
tr
0.8
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
tr
0.8
0.2
0.2
Min = minimal percentage. Max = maximal percentage. Mean = average percentage. SD = standard deviation. tr = trace (<0.05%).Table 3
Triacylglycerols composition ofTonda di Villacidro, Tonda di Cagliari, Semidana, and Bosana EVOO (%, w/w).
Triacylglycerols
Tonda di Villacidro
Tonda di Cagliari
Semidana
Bosana
ECN
Area [%]
Area [%]
Area [%]
Area [%]
Min
Max
Mean
±SD
Min
Max
Mean
±SD
Min
Max
Mean
±SD
Min
Max
Mean
±SD
LLLa
42
0.1
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.5
0.4
0.1
tr
0.8
0.4
0.2
tr
0.6
0.3
0.1
LnLO
42
0.2
0.5
0.4
0.1
0.2
0.5
0.4
0.1
0.2
0.6
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.3
0.1
PLLn
42
tr
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.1
tr
0.4
0.2
0.1
tr
0.3
0.2
0.1
LLOa
44
2.1
5.9
3.7
1.0
3.3
5.4
4.1
1.0
2.1
7.2
4.8
1.0
1.9
7.0
3.6
1.1
LnOO
44
0.7
1.2
0.9
0.2
0.7
1.2
1.0
0.2
0.5
1.3
0.9
0.2
0.6
1.6
1.0
0.2
LLPa
44
1.1
8.8
3.8
2.4
1.5
8.0
3.6
2.6
1.1
8.2
2.8
1.9
0.4
5.6
1.8
1.1
LnOP
44
0.9
2.3
1.4
0.5
0.5
2.4
1.4
0.7
0.5
2.2
1.0
0.5
0.5
2.7
1.0
0.5
LOOa
46
11.2
19.8
15.6
3.1
12.5
17.4
14.9
1.6
12.3
19.6
14.3
1.6
10.9
19.8
14.0
2.3
LOPa
46
2.0
4.2
3.0
0.7
2.3
9.7
3.6
2.5
2.2
11.2
6.1
3.4
1.5
9.9
4.1
2.7
PLP
46
0.2
0.6
0.4
0.1
0.2
1.1
0.4
0.3
0.2
1.4
0.7
0.4
0.1
1.2
0.4
0.3
OOOa
48
15.8
34.5
25.4
4.8
20.1
31.7
26.1
4.2
16.5
34.6
23.2
3.6
23.7
39.0
31.3
3.8
POOa
48
19.1
23.7
21.6
1.4
15.2
21.2
19.9
2.0
14.5
22.8
18.4
2.8
14.2
23.9
19.5
2.7
POPa
48
0.3
1.6
0.9
0.4
0.5
1.4
0.8
0.3
tr
1.4
0.7
0.3
tr
3.1
0.6
0.4
PSL
48
1.0
4.2
2.7
1.4
0.7
3.5
2.0
1.0
0.5
4.0
1.7
1.2
0.3
3.8
1.6
1.0
SSLn
48
0.5
2.8
1.7
1.0
0.4
3.2
1.3
1.1
0.4
3.1
1.0
1.0
0.2
3.4
1.1
0.9
SOOa
50
2.1
6.2
4.0
1.6
1.0
5.1
2.8
1.5
0.8
5.8
2.0
1.6
0.5
7.1
2.8
1.6
aCompounds identified by comparison with pure standard. tr = trace < 0.05%.
L: linoleic, Ln: linolenic, P: palmitic, O: oleic, and S: stearic acids.Antioxidant compounds are fundamental for both oil stability and nutritional aspects. Lipophilic antioxidant compounds (α- and γ-tocopherols, squalene, chlorophylls, and carotenoids) were quantified by different analytical methods and the results are reported in Table 4. Squalene, which is an important molecule that gives oils some pharmacological properties [26], dominates in all samples (about 5000 mg/kg), followed by tocopherols, carotenoids, and chlorophylls.Tonda di Villacidro andSemidana EVOO exhibited the highest amount of squalene (6232.8 ± 1330.8 and 6023.2 ± 1296.4 mg/kg, resp.), whereasBosana EVOO showed the highest amount of tocopherols (213.3 ± 55.4 and 8.7 ± 4.7 mg/kg for α- and γ-tocopherol, resp.). As regards these compounds, the varieties included in the EVOO PDO “Sardegna” production specification must have an amount in tocopherols (α + γ) at least of 100 mg/kg [5] and this value is exceeded in all the analyzed samples (Table 4).Table 4
Lipophilic antioxidant compounds ofTonda di Villacidro, Tonda di Cagliari, Semidana, and Bosana EVOO (mg/kg).
Tonda di Villacidro
Tonda di Cagliari
Semidana
Bosana
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
Min
Max
Mean
±SD
Min
Max
Mean
±SD
Min
Max
Mean
±SD
Min
Max
Mean
±SD
Squalene
4676.7
8672.0
6232.8
1330.8
3273.7
9964.0
5106.2
1865.7
4640.3
7705.0
6023.2
1296.4
1837.4
9691.0
4559.9
1809.2
α-Tocopherol
112.9
226.1
172.2
46.1
144.2
170.0
159.3
12.7
136.6
260.5
181.5
35.0
158.2
268.4
213.3
55.4
γ-Tocopherol
9.7
22.1
15.3
4.7
5.1
12.0
8.8
3.0
3.1
18.4
9.1
4.7
2.5
22.3
8.7
4.7
Chlorophylls
4.2
25.1
8.8
6.4
7.4
12.6
10.5
2.0
3.2
17.5
6.5
3.8
2.8
23.9
10.8
4.9
Carotenoids
5.3
54.6
34.3
20.6
7.2
88.6
47.6
40.1
1.2
67.6
20.9
26.3
1.0
106.0
26.0
28.5The average level of total phenols (TPs) found in oils (ca. 240 mg GAE/kg) resulted to be on the average compared to other olive oils analyzed in other studies [27–29]. The PDO “Sardegna” production specification requires an amount of TP higher than 100mg GAE/kg [5] and all the four analyzed EVOOs meet this requirement (Table 5). The antioxidant activity of the polar compounds extracted in the HF was evaluated by FRAP, DPPH∙, and ABTS∙+ assays (Table 5).Bosana EVOO showed the highest TP concentration (335.20 ± 121.34mg GAE/kg), and this data is correlated with the highest antiradical (1.17 ± 0.37mmol TEAC/kg, DPPH∙ assay, and 1.19 ± 0.43mmol TEAC/kg, ABTS∙+ assay) and total antioxidant (2.38 ± 0.52mmol Fe2+/kg, FRAP assay) activities (Table 5).Table 5
Total phenolic content and antioxidant activities of hydrophilic fraction ofTonda di Villacidro, Tonda di Cagliari, Semidana, and Bosana EVOO.
Assay
Tonda di Villacidro
Tonda di Cagliari
Semidana
Bosana
Min
Max
Mean
±SD
Min
Max
Mean
±SD
Min
Max
Mean
±SD
Min
Max
Mean
±SD
Total phenols(mg GAEa/kg)
158.40
219.50
182.35
22.54
142.80
388.00
261.18
83.83
133.10
249.20
179.73
42.64
249.40
421.00
335.20
121.34
DPPH∙
b (mmol TEAC/kg)
0.08
0.52
0.25
0.16
0.13
0.52
0.29
0.14
0.10
0.64
0.29
0.18
0.51
1.68
1.17
0.37
ABTS∙
+
b (mmol TEAC/kg)
0.09
0.33
0.22
0.09
0.19
0.52
0.33
0.12
0.11
0.77
0.34
0.22
0.55
1.88
1.19
0.43
FRAPc (mmol Fe2+/kg)
0.39
1.03
0.88
0.23
0.52
1.57
1.02
0.36
0.36
1.66
0.99
0.39
1.42
2.95
2.38
0.52
aGAE: gallic acid equivalent. bDPPH∙ and ABTS∙
+ values are expressed as TEAC millimolar concentration, obtained from a Trolox solution having an antiradical capacity equivalent to that of the dilution of the EVOO. cFRAP value is expressed as Fe2+ millimolar concentration, obtained from a FeSO4 solution having an antioxidant capacity equivalent to that of the dilution of the EVOO.The hydrophilic extracts obtained from four monovarietal EVOOs were also analyzed by LC-DAD to quantify the main phenolic compounds and the results are shown in Table6. Significant differences among most of the phenolic constituent levels were observed from the extracts. Taking into account that the mechanical extraction process (grinding, malaxing, and separation) was very similar for both oils, differences in phenolic compounds amount can be primarily due to the variety but can be affected also by year, peculiar atmospheric conditions, agronomic practices, storage, and maturation grade [30–32]. Targeted analysis showed that the most abundant secoiridoids of the samples were dialdehydic form of elenolic acid linked to hydroxytyrosol or tyrosol (p-HPEA), respectively, assigned as 3,4-DHPEA-EDA, 3,4-HPEA-EA, andp-HPEA-EDA. Other phenolics such as vanillic acid,p-coumaric acid, flavones (luteolin and apigenin), and lignans (pinoresinol and 1-acetoxypinoresinol) were found in almost all analyzed samples.Bosana HF showed the highest amount of the targeted phenolic compounds dosed (142.2 ± 4.7mg/kg), confirming that the oil obtained from this cultivar is one of the richest in polyphenols [10]. This extracts were characterized statistically by the highest amount of 3,4-HPEA-EA and 3,4-DHPEA-EDA (84.7 ± 55.4 and 35.8 ± 19.9mg/kg, resp.). This HF was also the richest in hydroxytyrosol and tyrosol, phenolic compounds highlighted for their health benefits [33, 34].Table 6
Phenolic compounds isolated fromTonda di Villacidro, Tonda di Cagliari, Semidana, and Bosana EVOO hydrophilic fraction.
Compounds
Tonda di Villacidro
Tonda di Cagliari
Semidana
Bosana
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
Min
Max
Mean
±SD
Min
Max
Mean
±SD
Min
Max
Mean
±SD
Min
Max
Mean
±SD
Hydroxytyrosola
tr
2.7
0.4
0.9
0.6
12.8
2.4
3.6
tr
7.5
2.1
2.6
3.4
26.9
9.0
8.6
Tyrosola
nd
2.5
1.2
1.0
0.3
12.2
5.3
3.2
tr
8.8
4.5
2.9
11.8
36.7
22.5
11.6
Vanillic acida
nd
nd
nd
tr
0.8
0.3
0.2
0.3
3.9
1.3
1.4
tr
1.6
0.6
0.3
p-Coumaric acida
nd
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.7
0.3
0.2
0.0
4.6
1.5
1.8
tr
3.2
0.4
0.4
3,4-DHPEA-EDAb
0.4
19.7
6.8
7.4
0.4
1.9
1.0
0.7
3.3
22.0
11.6
7.9
2.0
67.6
9.8
13.3
Pinoresinola
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
tr
32.3
12.4
14.0
4.1
22.9
9.8
7.6
p-HPEA-EDAb
3.4
23.3
10.3
7.9
0.5
31.0
10.6
10.5
2.5
29.2
13.6
9.8
11.2
66.4
35.8
19.9
Luteolina
1.0
4.4
2.5
1.8
2.1
16.1
5.5
3.3
2.3
4.5
3.4
1.0
0.2
7.1
2.8
1.7
Acetoxypinoresinolb
2.3
8.4
5.4
2.5
nd
nd
nd
0.5
17.4
8.4
6.4
tr
10.7
5.3
3.3
3,4-HPEA-EAb
0.3
5.1
2.2
1.7
1.6
40.7
14.8
14.6
1.0
73.2
20.8
25.7
22.3
145.0
84.7
55.4
Apigenina
0.9
6.1
2.0
2.0
1.1
6.5
1.9
1.4
0.6
5.9
1.0
2.0
0.2
2.1
0.8
0.4
Min = minimal value; Max = maximal value; mean = average value; SD = standard deviation; nd = not detected (<LOD);aidentification based on RT and UV-Vis spectra of pure compounds; btentative identification by UV-Vis spectra and comparison of retention times with the literature data; 3,4-DHPEA-EDA, dialdehydic form of decarboxymethyl elenolic acid linked to hydroxytyrosol (decarboxymethyl oleuropein aglycone); p-HPEA-EDA, dialdehydic form of decarboxymethyl  elenolic acid linked to tyrosol (decarboxymethyl ligstroside aglycone); 3,4-DHPEA-EA, oleuropein aglycone.


## 4. Conclusions

In this work were highlighted the chemical characteristics of the four EVOOs that are included in PDO “Sardegna.” They exhibited all parameters within the limits for the EVOO category; moreover, all the EVOOs showed levels of tocopherols and phenolic compounds higher than the minimum reported in the PDO “Sardegna” production specification, therefore satisfying the parameters of the Protected Designation of Origin. Inside each variety, some peculiarities in the analytical data can be noticed, but the strong variability makes them not significant. The analysis of fatty acids and triacylglycerols composition does not help to clearly differentiate the four Sardinian varieties. The phenolic profile of the EVOO’s HF may be more useful.Bosana HFs confirm data that were previously reported in the literature, proving to be the oil rich in antioxidants (lipophilic and hydrophilic) and then with a huge antioxidant activity. Anyway, all the HFs from four varieties showed a good antioxidant capacity and it may be interesting to appreciate the product not only from the sensorial point of view, but also from that of nutraceutical use.



---

*Source: 8462741-2016-03-28.xml*