# Corrosion and Strength Behaviors in Prestressed Tendon under Various Tensile Stress and Impressed Current Conditions

Authors: Bang-Yeon Lee; K. T. Koh; M. A. Ismail; H. S. Ryu; S. J. Kwon
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

Corrosion occurs more rapidly under high tensile stress and this leads to several problems like degradation of serviceability and structural performance in PSC (prestressed concrete) structures. In this paper, impressed current method, so-called ICM, was applied to tendons under tensile loadings of 0.0, 20.0, 40.0, and 60.0% of ultimate load. With induction of 20 volts for 24 hours to tendon under tensile stress, loading was induced to failure and the ultimate load was evaluated with varying corrosion behaviors. The changing mechanical behaviors in the same corrosive conditions were evaluated under different initial prestressing levels. With increasing initial prestressing load, corrosion occurred more rapidly and corrosion amount also increased linearly. The ultimate load accordingly decreased with increasing initial prestressing and corrosion amount. The relationships between prestressing levels and corrosion behaviors were quantitatively obtained through regression analysis. The measured current during applied voltage and the related corrosion amounts were also dealt with in this work.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Concrete is a construction material with high compressive strength but low tensile strength, so that reinforcements are required in the region subjected to tensile stress. Normal structural steel is usually used as reinforcement due to clear design parameters such as yielding stress, yielding strain, and elastic modulus [1, 2]. For long structural members, prestressing tendons are efficiently used as PSC (prestressed concrete) members since it can use total area as effective area, namely, compressive region through downing neural axis.Tendon has almost the same Young’s modulus as structural steel but higher ultimate strength, over 1,200 MPa, and wider elastic region [3, 4]. PSC has several engineering strong points such as reduction of self-weight, crack-free section, and easy construction of long member. The tendons inside sheath are always subjected to high tensile stress around 60% of ultimate strength. They are basically protected by grout but corrosion can be caused by imperfection of grouting and partial exposure to air. Corrosion initiation and propagation in reinforcement are accelerated when tendon is under tensile stress since the composition in reinforcement is loosened, which yields more rapid current density in given corrosive conditions [5, 6]. So many structural degradations have been reported and they also required repair or restrengthening in a large scale [7–9]. Concrete specifications and structural codes have suggested more strict guidelines for corrosion control for PSC [2, 10, 11]. The corroded tendon causes not only reduction of serviceability such as more deflection and cracks but also reduction of bearing capacity in PSC girder [12–14]. Recently many NDTs (nondestructive techniques) have been adopted for detection of corrosion initiation and progress in existing PSC structures but they have limited applications due to impedance of local signals, effect of cover concrete (sheath and grouting), and twisted section of strand [15–18].There are many researches on accelerated corrosion for normal steel; however accelerated corrosion behavior in tendon subjected to high tensile stress is limitedly studied. In this work, normal tendons with 15.3 mm diameter were prepared and accelerated corrosion test was performed under different tensile loading levels from 0% to 60% of the ultimate load. For the acceleration corrosion test, ICM (impressed current method) was adopted, and transported currents, corrosion amounts, and the ultimate loads after ICM test were also evaluated. The relationships between corrosion behavior and mechanical characteristics were quantitatively obtained.


## 2. Test Programs for Corrosion Acceleration and Loading Control

### 2.1. Setup for Loading System

Steel frame with high strength was designed and prestressing to the desired level was carried out before acceleration of corrosion. Three different loading levels were adopted as 20%, 40%, and 60% of the ultimate load. In order to avoid the current induced to data logger and sensors, rubber plates were fixed around load cell and bearing plate. Prestressing loss is caused by slip of wedge in open barrel during loading prestressing, so that corrosion acceleration is performed after completion of the desired prestressing through repeating jacking and inserting wedge. Figure1 shows the test setup.Figure 1
Test setup for loading and prestressing system.


### 2.2. Setup for ICM System

#### 2.2.1. Acceleration of Corrosion through IMC (Impressed Current Method)

Accelerated corrosion was set up in the empty room of the frame. In the harsh environmental condition, few decades are needed for strength reduction in steel or tendon due to corrosion [19, 20]. In the work, ICM was adopted for acceleration of corrosion, by which considerable reduction of strength can be expected within a short period. It is recognized as an efficient method for corrosion acceleration for monitoring cracking in cover concrete and reduction of strength in corroded steel [18, 21, 22]. Corrosion amount through exchange of Fe2+ ion can be calculated according to Faraday’s Law as follows:(1)Mcor=czF·∫qdt,where Mcor is corrosion amount (mol), z is ion valence of Fe (equal to 2), F is Faraday’s number (96,500), q and t are current (Amp) and duration time (sec), respectively, and c is assumed as experimental constant.


#### 2.2.2. Measurement of Current and Corrosion Rust

The accelerated corrosion was performed in a corrosion cell inside the steel frame. The cotton towel with 75 mm width and 5 mm thickness was submerged in 3.5% of NaCl solution and the middle part of tendon was covered with the saturated towel, which induced chloride saturation on the tendon through capillary suction. In order to measure equivalent current induction, each strand was welded with wire and 20 V of electrical charge was applied. After accelerated corrosion for 24 hours, the given length of 75 mm was cut and submerged in 5.0% of C6H8O7 acid for removal of rust. The weight loss was evaluated through measuring the initial weight and the weight after ICM test. Figure 2 shows corrosion cell and removal of rust process.Figure 2
Corrosion cell and rust removal process.
(a)
Corrosion cell
(b)
Removal of rust in corroded tendonThe total procedure of tests for loading and accelerating corrosion is summarized in Table1.Table 1
The entire procedure for loading and corrosion tests.
Step
Action
Related photos
1st
Installation of steel frame and tendon setup
2nd
Preparation of 3.5% NaCl solution and saturation
3rd
Installation of bearing plate, barrel, and wedge
4th
Welding of strand and wire/attachment of gauge
5th
Prestressing to designed level (0%, 20%, 40%, and 60% of the ultimate loading)
6th
Performing ICM with 20 V for 1 day
7th
Loading to failure
8th
Measurement of corroded weight


## 2.1. Setup for Loading System

Steel frame with high strength was designed and prestressing to the desired level was carried out before acceleration of corrosion. Three different loading levels were adopted as 20%, 40%, and 60% of the ultimate load. In order to avoid the current induced to data logger and sensors, rubber plates were fixed around load cell and bearing plate. Prestressing loss is caused by slip of wedge in open barrel during loading prestressing, so that corrosion acceleration is performed after completion of the desired prestressing through repeating jacking and inserting wedge. Figure1 shows the test setup.Figure 1
Test setup for loading and prestressing system.


## 2.2. Setup for ICM System

### 2.2.1. Acceleration of Corrosion through IMC (Impressed Current Method)

Accelerated corrosion was set up in the empty room of the frame. In the harsh environmental condition, few decades are needed for strength reduction in steel or tendon due to corrosion [19, 20]. In the work, ICM was adopted for acceleration of corrosion, by which considerable reduction of strength can be expected within a short period. It is recognized as an efficient method for corrosion acceleration for monitoring cracking in cover concrete and reduction of strength in corroded steel [18, 21, 22]. Corrosion amount through exchange of Fe2+ ion can be calculated according to Faraday’s Law as follows:(1)Mcor=czF·∫qdt,where Mcor is corrosion amount (mol), z is ion valence of Fe (equal to 2), F is Faraday’s number (96,500), q and t are current (Amp) and duration time (sec), respectively, and c is assumed as experimental constant.


### 2.2.2. Measurement of Current and Corrosion Rust

The accelerated corrosion was performed in a corrosion cell inside the steel frame. The cotton towel with 75 mm width and 5 mm thickness was submerged in 3.5% of NaCl solution and the middle part of tendon was covered with the saturated towel, which induced chloride saturation on the tendon through capillary suction. In order to measure equivalent current induction, each strand was welded with wire and 20 V of electrical charge was applied. After accelerated corrosion for 24 hours, the given length of 75 mm was cut and submerged in 5.0% of C6H8O7 acid for removal of rust. The weight loss was evaluated through measuring the initial weight and the weight after ICM test. Figure 2 shows corrosion cell and removal of rust process.Figure 2
Corrosion cell and rust removal process.
(a)
Corrosion cell
(b)
Removal of rust in corroded tendonThe total procedure of tests for loading and accelerating corrosion is summarized in Table1.Table 1
The entire procedure for loading and corrosion tests.
Step
Action
Related photos
1st
Installation of steel frame and tendon setup
2nd
Preparation of 3.5% NaCl solution and saturation
3rd
Installation of bearing plate, barrel, and wedge
4th
Welding of strand and wire/attachment of gauge
5th
Prestressing to designed level (0%, 20%, 40%, and 60% of the ultimate loading)
6th
Performing ICM with 20 V for 1 day
7th
Loading to failure
8th
Measurement of corroded weight


## 2.2.1. Acceleration of Corrosion through IMC (Impressed Current Method)

Accelerated corrosion was set up in the empty room of the frame. In the harsh environmental condition, few decades are needed for strength reduction in steel or tendon due to corrosion [19, 20]. In the work, ICM was adopted for acceleration of corrosion, by which considerable reduction of strength can be expected within a short period. It is recognized as an efficient method for corrosion acceleration for monitoring cracking in cover concrete and reduction of strength in corroded steel [18, 21, 22]. Corrosion amount through exchange of Fe2+ ion can be calculated according to Faraday’s Law as follows:(1)Mcor=czF·∫qdt,where Mcor is corrosion amount (mol), z is ion valence of Fe (equal to 2), F is Faraday’s number (96,500), q and t are current (Amp) and duration time (sec), respectively, and c is assumed as experimental constant.


## 2.2.2. Measurement of Current and Corrosion Rust

The accelerated corrosion was performed in a corrosion cell inside the steel frame. The cotton towel with 75 mm width and 5 mm thickness was submerged in 3.5% of NaCl solution and the middle part of tendon was covered with the saturated towel, which induced chloride saturation on the tendon through capillary suction. In order to measure equivalent current induction, each strand was welded with wire and 20 V of electrical charge was applied. After accelerated corrosion for 24 hours, the given length of 75 mm was cut and submerged in 5.0% of C6H8O7 acid for removal of rust. The weight loss was evaluated through measuring the initial weight and the weight after ICM test. Figure 2 shows corrosion cell and removal of rust process.Figure 2
Corrosion cell and rust removal process.
(a)
Corrosion cell
(b)
Removal of rust in corroded tendonThe total procedure of tests for loading and accelerating corrosion is summarized in Table1.Table 1
The entire procedure for loading and corrosion tests.
Step
Action
Related photos
1st
Installation of steel frame and tendon setup
2nd
Preparation of 3.5% NaCl solution and saturation
3rd
Installation of bearing plate, barrel, and wedge
4th
Welding of strand and wire/attachment of gauge
5th
Prestressing to designed level (0%, 20%, 40%, and 60% of the ultimate loading)
6th
Performing ICM with 20 V for 1 day
7th
Loading to failure
8th
Measurement of corroded weight


## 3. Reduction of the Ultimate Load after Accelerated Corrosion Test

### 3.1. Variation of Current with Different Loading Levels

#### 3.1.1. Corrosion Current and Prestressing

With increasing prestressing level, the measured current also increases, and that is in line with the previous researches. When corrosive condition is stable, the concentration of NaCl in member under tensile stress is getting higher and thus ion current increases accordingly [5, 6]. The measured current values are shown in Figure 3 with different prestressing levels. The increasing ratio of current with prestressing is 126.6% for 20% level, 175.4% for 40% level, and 193.9% for 60% level, respectively. Figure 4 shows the summation of current measurements in the same accelerated period.Figure 3
Changes in measured current with different prestressing level.Figure 4
Summation of measurements with different prestressing level.


#### 3.1.2. Corrosion Weight with Different Stress Level

The corroded strands are twisted and deformed, so that it is difficult to cut with accurate length of 75.0 mm. The test results for corrosion amount are plotted in Figure5 with calculation results referring to Faraday’s Law with 1.6 of experimental constant in (1). In the constant ICM condition, corrosion amount is evaluated to be proportional to summation of currents.Figure 5
Corrosion amount with stress level.The differences from measurement and calculation can be inferred by several reasons like (1) measuring errors for corrosion amount and original length of tendon (75.0 mm), (2) usage of tab water, (3) variations of local conditions of temperature and towel saturation, and (4) imperfect attachment and welding for equivalent current inducement.


### 3.2. Reduction of the Ultimate Loading

#### 3.2.1. Reduced Prestressing Level during ICM Test

During accelerated corrosion test, tendons under high tensile stress are rapidly corroded, which allows a reduction in the area and additional release in the tendon. Unfortunately, only the initial and final loads were measured without decreasing prestressing stress during test since data logger might be overcharged in the applied current. In Figure6(a), initial and final loadings are plotted after ICM test. Effective ratio can be determined as the ratio of residual prestressing force to initial prestressing force.Figure 6
Relationship between (a) initial and final loads after corrosion test and prestressing level and (b) prestressing level, corrosion ratio, and measured current.
(a)
Initial and final loads after corrosion test
(b)
Corrosion amount and effective ratioThe effective ratios with varying prestressing level are plotted in Figure6(b) with measured corrosion currents and corrosion ratios. The effective ratios are 55.6% for 20% level, 72.8% for 40% level, and 76.4% for 60% level of prestressing, respectively. Effective ratio has similar pattern to the transported current and corrosion amount.


#### 3.2.2. Reduction in the Ultimate Loads due to Corrosion and Prestressing Level

(1) Reduction of Ultimate Load with Different Prestressing Levels. After ICM test, tensile loading test to failure is performed for the evaluation of ultimate load. Ultimate load rapidly decreases with increasing prestressing level in the same corrosive condition. Figure 7 shows the relationship between ultimate loads and corrosion at different stress levels.Figure 7
The relationship between ultimate loads and corrosion at different stress level.In the control case (without corrosion test), the average ultimate load is 27.16 tonf; however it decreases to 71.6~74.8% level after ICM test for 24 hours. In the same corrosive condition, the ultimate load decreases to 56.3~70.0% subjected to 20% of loading level, 45.8~46.4% for 40% level, and 38.4~40.6% for 60% level of prestressing. As shown in Figure7, strength reduction due to the effect of accelerated corrosion accompanied by prestressing level is clearly evaluated.(2) Changes in Stress-Strain Curve in the Corroded Tendon. In order to evaluate the mechanical behavior in the tendon under corrosion and tensile stress, stress-strain behavior is monitored after ICM test. The signal from load cell and gauge on the tendon surface out of corroded area (shown in Figure 2) are read in data logger. Although the strain gauge is attached on the twisted tendon out of corrosion area, stress-strain behavior can be approximately evaluated. The results are shown in Figure 8.Figure 8
Stress-strain curve in corroded tendon after ICM test.As shown in Figure8, slight reduction of stiffness is evaluated in corroded tendon with increasing stress level which accelerates corrosion. With increasing prestressing level, clear reduction of ultimate strength and elongation to break are observed; however the stiffness degradation is not evaluated clearly due to twisted shape and local corrosion of tendon.


### 3.3. Relationship between Prestressing Level and Corrosion Behavior

In this section, the relationship between corrosion behavior and ultimate load was investigated considering the different prestressing levels. The results of corrosion ratio and ultimate load are plotted in Figure9 with regression analysis results, which show clear linear relationships between corrosion ratio of weight and the ultimate load with high coefficient of determination (0.9658).Figure 9
Relationship between ultimate load and corrosion ratio.In the constant corrosive condition, the effect of prestressing on corrosion acceleration is plotted in Figure10. Figures 10(a) and 10(b) are for the relationships between prestressing level and corrosion ratio and prestressing level and ratio of corrosion to control case (without prestressing), respectively. Clear increase in the ratio of corrosion is evaluated with high prestressing level with 0.9696 ofR2. With increasing prestressing level, corrosion velocity also increases to 124.3~126.5% for 20% level, 165.5~166.8% for 40% level, and 178.5~189.8% for 60% level of prestressing with clear linearity relation.Figure 10
Relationship between prestressing levels and corrosion behaviors.
(a)
Prestressing level and measured corrosion ratio in the tendon
(b)
Prestressing level and increasing ratio of accelerated corrosion ratio


## 3.1. Variation of Current with Different Loading Levels

### 3.1.1. Corrosion Current and Prestressing

With increasing prestressing level, the measured current also increases, and that is in line with the previous researches. When corrosive condition is stable, the concentration of NaCl in member under tensile stress is getting higher and thus ion current increases accordingly [5, 6]. The measured current values are shown in Figure 3 with different prestressing levels. The increasing ratio of current with prestressing is 126.6% for 20% level, 175.4% for 40% level, and 193.9% for 60% level, respectively. Figure 4 shows the summation of current measurements in the same accelerated period.Figure 3
Changes in measured current with different prestressing level.Figure 4
Summation of measurements with different prestressing level.


### 3.1.2. Corrosion Weight with Different Stress Level

The corroded strands are twisted and deformed, so that it is difficult to cut with accurate length of 75.0 mm. The test results for corrosion amount are plotted in Figure5 with calculation results referring to Faraday’s Law with 1.6 of experimental constant in (1). In the constant ICM condition, corrosion amount is evaluated to be proportional to summation of currents.Figure 5
Corrosion amount with stress level.The differences from measurement and calculation can be inferred by several reasons like (1) measuring errors for corrosion amount and original length of tendon (75.0 mm), (2) usage of tab water, (3) variations of local conditions of temperature and towel saturation, and (4) imperfect attachment and welding for equivalent current inducement.


## 3.1.1. Corrosion Current and Prestressing

With increasing prestressing level, the measured current also increases, and that is in line with the previous researches. When corrosive condition is stable, the concentration of NaCl in member under tensile stress is getting higher and thus ion current increases accordingly [5, 6]. The measured current values are shown in Figure 3 with different prestressing levels. The increasing ratio of current with prestressing is 126.6% for 20% level, 175.4% for 40% level, and 193.9% for 60% level, respectively. Figure 4 shows the summation of current measurements in the same accelerated period.Figure 3
Changes in measured current with different prestressing level.Figure 4
Summation of measurements with different prestressing level.


## 3.1.2. Corrosion Weight with Different Stress Level

The corroded strands are twisted and deformed, so that it is difficult to cut with accurate length of 75.0 mm. The test results for corrosion amount are plotted in Figure5 with calculation results referring to Faraday’s Law with 1.6 of experimental constant in (1). In the constant ICM condition, corrosion amount is evaluated to be proportional to summation of currents.Figure 5
Corrosion amount with stress level.The differences from measurement and calculation can be inferred by several reasons like (1) measuring errors for corrosion amount and original length of tendon (75.0 mm), (2) usage of tab water, (3) variations of local conditions of temperature and towel saturation, and (4) imperfect attachment and welding for equivalent current inducement.


## 3.2. Reduction of the Ultimate Loading

### 3.2.1. Reduced Prestressing Level during ICM Test

During accelerated corrosion test, tendons under high tensile stress are rapidly corroded, which allows a reduction in the area and additional release in the tendon. Unfortunately, only the initial and final loads were measured without decreasing prestressing stress during test since data logger might be overcharged in the applied current. In Figure6(a), initial and final loadings are plotted after ICM test. Effective ratio can be determined as the ratio of residual prestressing force to initial prestressing force.Figure 6
Relationship between (a) initial and final loads after corrosion test and prestressing level and (b) prestressing level, corrosion ratio, and measured current.
(a)
Initial and final loads after corrosion test
(b)
Corrosion amount and effective ratioThe effective ratios with varying prestressing level are plotted in Figure6(b) with measured corrosion currents and corrosion ratios. The effective ratios are 55.6% for 20% level, 72.8% for 40% level, and 76.4% for 60% level of prestressing, respectively. Effective ratio has similar pattern to the transported current and corrosion amount.


### 3.2.2. Reduction in the Ultimate Loads due to Corrosion and Prestressing Level

(1) Reduction of Ultimate Load with Different Prestressing Levels. After ICM test, tensile loading test to failure is performed for the evaluation of ultimate load. Ultimate load rapidly decreases with increasing prestressing level in the same corrosive condition. Figure 7 shows the relationship between ultimate loads and corrosion at different stress levels.Figure 7
The relationship between ultimate loads and corrosion at different stress level.In the control case (without corrosion test), the average ultimate load is 27.16 tonf; however it decreases to 71.6~74.8% level after ICM test for 24 hours. In the same corrosive condition, the ultimate load decreases to 56.3~70.0% subjected to 20% of loading level, 45.8~46.4% for 40% level, and 38.4~40.6% for 60% level of prestressing. As shown in Figure7, strength reduction due to the effect of accelerated corrosion accompanied by prestressing level is clearly evaluated.(2) Changes in Stress-Strain Curve in the Corroded Tendon. In order to evaluate the mechanical behavior in the tendon under corrosion and tensile stress, stress-strain behavior is monitored after ICM test. The signal from load cell and gauge on the tendon surface out of corroded area (shown in Figure 2) are read in data logger. Although the strain gauge is attached on the twisted tendon out of corrosion area, stress-strain behavior can be approximately evaluated. The results are shown in Figure 8.Figure 8
Stress-strain curve in corroded tendon after ICM test.As shown in Figure8, slight reduction of stiffness is evaluated in corroded tendon with increasing stress level which accelerates corrosion. With increasing prestressing level, clear reduction of ultimate strength and elongation to break are observed; however the stiffness degradation is not evaluated clearly due to twisted shape and local corrosion of tendon.


## 3.2.1. Reduced Prestressing Level during ICM Test

During accelerated corrosion test, tendons under high tensile stress are rapidly corroded, which allows a reduction in the area and additional release in the tendon. Unfortunately, only the initial and final loads were measured without decreasing prestressing stress during test since data logger might be overcharged in the applied current. In Figure6(a), initial and final loadings are plotted after ICM test. Effective ratio can be determined as the ratio of residual prestressing force to initial prestressing force.Figure 6
Relationship between (a) initial and final loads after corrosion test and prestressing level and (b) prestressing level, corrosion ratio, and measured current.
(a)
Initial and final loads after corrosion test
(b)
Corrosion amount and effective ratioThe effective ratios with varying prestressing level are plotted in Figure6(b) with measured corrosion currents and corrosion ratios. The effective ratios are 55.6% for 20% level, 72.8% for 40% level, and 76.4% for 60% level of prestressing, respectively. Effective ratio has similar pattern to the transported current and corrosion amount.


## 3.2.2. Reduction in the Ultimate Loads due to Corrosion and Prestressing Level

(1) Reduction of Ultimate Load with Different Prestressing Levels. After ICM test, tensile loading test to failure is performed for the evaluation of ultimate load. Ultimate load rapidly decreases with increasing prestressing level in the same corrosive condition. Figure 7 shows the relationship between ultimate loads and corrosion at different stress levels.Figure 7
The relationship between ultimate loads and corrosion at different stress level.In the control case (without corrosion test), the average ultimate load is 27.16 tonf; however it decreases to 71.6~74.8% level after ICM test for 24 hours. In the same corrosive condition, the ultimate load decreases to 56.3~70.0% subjected to 20% of loading level, 45.8~46.4% for 40% level, and 38.4~40.6% for 60% level of prestressing. As shown in Figure7, strength reduction due to the effect of accelerated corrosion accompanied by prestressing level is clearly evaluated.(2) Changes in Stress-Strain Curve in the Corroded Tendon. In order to evaluate the mechanical behavior in the tendon under corrosion and tensile stress, stress-strain behavior is monitored after ICM test. The signal from load cell and gauge on the tendon surface out of corroded area (shown in Figure 2) are read in data logger. Although the strain gauge is attached on the twisted tendon out of corrosion area, stress-strain behavior can be approximately evaluated. The results are shown in Figure 8.Figure 8
Stress-strain curve in corroded tendon after ICM test.As shown in Figure8, slight reduction of stiffness is evaluated in corroded tendon with increasing stress level which accelerates corrosion. With increasing prestressing level, clear reduction of ultimate strength and elongation to break are observed; however the stiffness degradation is not evaluated clearly due to twisted shape and local corrosion of tendon.


## 3.3. Relationship between Prestressing Level and Corrosion Behavior

In this section, the relationship between corrosion behavior and ultimate load was investigated considering the different prestressing levels. The results of corrosion ratio and ultimate load are plotted in Figure9 with regression analysis results, which show clear linear relationships between corrosion ratio of weight and the ultimate load with high coefficient of determination (0.9658).Figure 9
Relationship between ultimate load and corrosion ratio.In the constant corrosive condition, the effect of prestressing on corrosion acceleration is plotted in Figure10. Figures 10(a) and 10(b) are for the relationships between prestressing level and corrosion ratio and prestressing level and ratio of corrosion to control case (without prestressing), respectively. Clear increase in the ratio of corrosion is evaluated with high prestressing level with 0.9696 ofR2. With increasing prestressing level, corrosion velocity also increases to 124.3~126.5% for 20% level, 165.5~166.8% for 40% level, and 178.5~189.8% for 60% level of prestressing with clear linearity relation.Figure 10
Relationship between prestressing levels and corrosion behaviors.
(a)
Prestressing level and measured corrosion ratio in the tendon
(b)
Prestressing level and increasing ratio of accelerated corrosion ratio


## 4. Conclusions

In this work, corrosion behavior and the reduction of ultimate loading to failure were investigated considering prestressing levels. With increasing prestressing level, the corrosion amount and ultimate load are evaluated to be changed linearly with higher current density. The conclusions can be drawn as follows:(1)
After 24 hours of accelerated corrosion test, effective ratios of prestressing force decrease to 55.6% for 20% level, 72.8% for 40% level, and 76.4% for 60% level of prestressing, respectively. Initial prestressing load is rapidly reduced by local elongation of tendon due to accelerated corrosion. The pattern of effective ratio with increasing prestressing level is much similar to those of corrosion ratio and summation of transported currents.(2)
With the increase in prestressing level in the same corrosive impressed current condition, corrosion ratio increases linearly, being 124.3~126.5% for 20% level, 165.5~166.8% for 40% level, and 178.5~189.8% for 60% level of prestressing, respectively. The reduction of ultimate load to failure is evaluated to be linear with corrosion ratio with high coefficient of determination (0.9658), so that prestressing level also has linear relationship with reduction of ultimate load in the same corrosive condition.



---

*Source: 8575816-2017-05-23.xml*