# Brazeability, Microstructure, and Joint Characteristics of ZrO2/Ti-6Al-4V Brazed by Ag-Cu-Ti Filler Reinforced with Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles

Authors: Ashutosh Sharma; Byungmin Ahn
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

In this work, we have attempted to develop the Ag-Cu-Ti filler for bonding ZrO2 to Ti-6Al-4V. The CeO2 nanoparticles were reinforced in the eutectic Ag-Cu-Ti filler via mechanical mixing and melting route. Furthermore, the brazeability, microstructure, and mechanical behavior, as well as brazing performance of the ZrO2/Ti-6Al-4V joints, were assessed. The wettability of the Ag-Cu-Ti matrix was increased from 89 to 98% on Ti-6Al-4V and from 83 to 89% on the ZrO2 substrate after the addition of 0.05% CeO2. Also, there was a depression in the melting point of the composite fillers up to 3°C. The microstructure consists of Cu- and Ag-rich phases and Cu-Ti intermetallic compounds (IMCs). The joint shear strength was improved with the addition of CeO2 up to 0.05 wt.% in the matrix. It was inferred that, for an excellent brazing performance of the ZrO2/Ti-6Al-4V joint, the optimum amount of CeO2 should be 0.05 wt.% in the Ag-Cu-Ti matrix.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Bonding of ceramic materials to metals is a recent hot topic in various engineering applications, including heat exchangers, connectors, capacitors, thermoelectrics, solar cells, and complex structural joints [1, 2]. It is always a practical challenge to bond these ceramic materials directly due to a wide difference in physicochemical and mechanical properties of ceramics and metals that imposes a great challenge in microjoining operations [2]. For this purpose, various popular brazing fillers are already developed where the most popular ones are eutectic Ag-Cu or Ag-Cu-Ti alloys as reported in the past [3, 4]. However, with regard to complex geometry, the thickness of IMCs, and cost, each filler is unique and has limitations of its own [5]. In such case, the selection of a superior filler metal is required for high reliability of brazed ceramic joints. If we inspect previous literatures, we see two major issues that are needed to be minimized in ceramic brazing, such as wetting of the contact surfaces and the stress development caused by the mismatch in mechanical and thermal properties of two contact materials that depend on the deformation characteristics of the filler used [1–5].There are various strategies developed to resolve these mentioned issues. First is the use of active metal brazing techniques. Active metal brazing is a simple and cost-effective approach where active elements like Ti or Zr as wetting promoters are used between the contact surfaces for bonding [1, 6]. Therefore, the popular Ag-Cu-Ti filler seems to be more reliable over the Ag-Cu filler due to its good wetting to most of the ceramics [7].Second is the use of additive elements or reinforcement particles to refine the interfacial layer, redistribute the stress in the matrix, and relax the joint stress. These secondary phases act as a wetting enhancer when used in optimum amounts [8, 9]. It was reported that the use of reinforcements provides outstanding benefits in terms of joint strength and interfacial characteristics [10, 11]. In the past, the use of nanomaterials has already been suggested as a potential technology for controlling the wetting, refining the grains, IMCs, as well as to tailor the joint microstructure [8–11]. In lead-free soldering, a variety of nanoparticles have found a wide scope in popular Sn-based alloys for tailoring the microstructure containing harmful Cu6Sn5 and Cu3Sn IMCs across the Cu-Sn interface [12–14]. Analogous to brazing, nanoparticles have been tried in few studies related to the low-temperature Al-brazing filler and remarkably improved wetting and joint performance are obtained. Al-brazing fillers have been embedded with SiC, La2O3, and ZrO2 successfully in low-temperature Al-brazing [11]. There are various studies in the past where researchers have used metal or nonmetallic additives to control the brazing performance. More recently, Shin and his coworkers have improved the wetting and brazing property of Al2O3/Cu joints with the addition of Sn in the Ag-Cu-Ti alloy during the brazing process [3]. Halbig and his coworkers used SiC particles in the Ag-Cu-Ti matrix for SiC brazing [15]. Miao et al. used graphite particles to improve the performance of metal-bonded high-speed grinding wheels [16]. Zhao et al. used MoS2 particles to enhance tribological properties of cubic boron nitride abrasive composites [17]. In another study, Miao et al. recommended that TiX additives in the Ag-Cu-Ti matrix (TiB2, TiN, and TiC) improve the shear strength of the brazed joints [18]. Most popular nanoreinforcements used regularly to reinforce a metal alloy include Al2O3, SiC, ZrO2, SnO2, CeO2, La2O3, and ZrSiO4 [14, 15, 19–23]. However, in ceramic brazing, limited studies exist on nanocomposite-based brazing fillers [24–26]. Among these nanoreinforcements, rare earth oxide, particularly, CeO2, has been used frequently for low temperature joining of electronic devices as well as in multiple applications such as photonics, energy storage devices, sensing, and power electronics.In view of these merits, we have chosen CeO2 nanoparticles produced via solution combustion method to reinforce the Ag-Cu-Ti matrix and apply for brazing of ZrO2 and Ti-6Al-4V plates in the lap-joint configuration. The microstructural, mechanical, and thermal properties of the composite fillers were studied. The effect of various fractions of CeO2 (x = 0, 0.03, 0.05, and 0.1 wt%) in the Ag-Cu-Ti matrix was studied for microstructure, wetting and brazed joint ZrO2, and Ti-6Al-4V strength.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Synthesis of CeO2 Powder

Cerium oxide nanopowder was prepared by using the high-temperature solution combustion method using ceric ammonium nitrate, citric acid, and glycine [27]. All the chemicals were of reagent grade supplied by Sigma Aldrich, USA.


### 2.2. Base Materials

The base materials used for brazing were ZrO2 and Ti-6Al-4V (Grade 5, ELI plate) rectangular plates obtained from Acucera, Inc., South Korea, and United Performance, USA, respectively. Both the base materials were diced by using a diamond saw into slices with a size of 60.0 mm × 15.0 mm × 2.0 mm for brazing and shear testing.


### 2.3. Synthesis of Composite

Four different types of composite fillers with different CeO2 contents were used in the experiment, as shown in Table 1. The powder mixtures were blended in a planetary mill (Planetary Ball Mill PM 400 Retsch, Germany) at 300 rpm for 24 hours (ball to powder weight ratio = 15 : 1). After milling, the mixed powder samples were mixed with Nocolok flux (10 : 1 ratio) and melted at 1050°C/30 minutes in a tube furnace.Table 1
Composition of various composite fillers used.
Serial no.
Filler matrix
Reinforcement nanoceria (x in wt.%)
Sample ID
1
Ag-28Cu-2Ti
x = 0
Ag-Cu-Ti
2
x = 0.03
Ag-Cu-Ti-0.03 CeO2
3
x = 0.05
Ag-Cu-Ti-0.05 CeO2
4
x = 0.1
Ag-Cu-Ti-0.1 CeO2


### 2.4. Brazeability

The brazeability of the composite fillers was determined from the spreading ratios of filler melted before and after melting (Figure1).Figure 1
Schematic diagram for the measurement of brazeability.The solidified composite filler (0.3 g approx.) was mixed with Nocolok flux (10 : 1 ratio) and placed over the substrate (30 mm × 30 mm × 2 mm) at 920°C. After a gap of 30 s, the filler was melted completely over the substrate. The spreading ratio (S) was estimated from the difference in the spread ratios before and after experiment [28].


### 2.5. Melting Point

The effect of CeO2 nanoparticles on the melting behavior of composite fillers was studied by using differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) apparatus (NETZSCH STA 449 F1). About 6–8 mg of specimens were heated in Al2O3 pans from 28 to 1000°C at a heating rate of 10°C/minute under the Ar atmosphere to minimize air oxidation.


### 2.6. Joint Fabrication

The composite filler was rolled down to a thickness of 0.25 mm and then applied between ZrO2 and Ti-6Al-4V alloy in a lap-joint structure. The whole assembly was brazed at 980°C for 10 min in a vacuum furnace at 5 × 10−6 Torr, as shown in the lap-joint structure in Figure 2.Figure 2
Schematic diagram for brazed joint fabrication.


### 2.7. Microstructure

The phase evolution and structure were determined by using X-ray diffractometer (XRD) from Bruker’s D8 Advance, Germany, at operating parameters of 40 mA and 40 kV and copper target (λ = 0.154 nm). The surface morphology of the developed composite fillers and joint cross section were examined in a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, Hitachi, Japan). To observe the distinct features of the interface, the joint cross section was etched by using an aqueous solution of FeCl3, H2O, HCl, and C2H5OH. The compositional analyses of the IMCs and phases were done by using the EDS detector attached to the FE-SEM.


### 2.8. Filler Microhardness

Microhardness of the developed composite fillers was measured by using a Vickers’ microhardness tester (VMHT-6, Leica). The testing parameters include an applied load of 25 gf for a dwell time of 20 s, respectively. The microhardness was automatically calculated and displayed over the display panel of the machine.


### 2.9. Brazing Joint Performance: Shear Test

The shear strength of the joint was estimated according to the JIS Z 3192 standard [29]. The testing was done by employing a universal testing machine (5 ton UTM, DUT-30000 CM, DK Eng., Korea) at a crosshead speed of 3 mm/minute. The schematic of the set-up used for the shear test is shown in Figure 3.Figure 3
Schematic diagram for the shear test.


## 2.1. Synthesis of CeO2 Powder

Cerium oxide nanopowder was prepared by using the high-temperature solution combustion method using ceric ammonium nitrate, citric acid, and glycine [27]. All the chemicals were of reagent grade supplied by Sigma Aldrich, USA.


## 2.2. Base Materials

The base materials used for brazing were ZrO2 and Ti-6Al-4V (Grade 5, ELI plate) rectangular plates obtained from Acucera, Inc., South Korea, and United Performance, USA, respectively. Both the base materials were diced by using a diamond saw into slices with a size of 60.0 mm × 15.0 mm × 2.0 mm for brazing and shear testing.


## 2.3. Synthesis of Composite

Four different types of composite fillers with different CeO2 contents were used in the experiment, as shown in Table 1. The powder mixtures were blended in a planetary mill (Planetary Ball Mill PM 400 Retsch, Germany) at 300 rpm for 24 hours (ball to powder weight ratio = 15 : 1). After milling, the mixed powder samples were mixed with Nocolok flux (10 : 1 ratio) and melted at 1050°C/30 minutes in a tube furnace.Table 1
Composition of various composite fillers used.
Serial no.
Filler matrix
Reinforcement nanoceria (x in wt.%)
Sample ID
1
Ag-28Cu-2Ti
x = 0
Ag-Cu-Ti
2
x = 0.03
Ag-Cu-Ti-0.03 CeO2
3
x = 0.05
Ag-Cu-Ti-0.05 CeO2
4
x = 0.1
Ag-Cu-Ti-0.1 CeO2


## 2.4. Brazeability

The brazeability of the composite fillers was determined from the spreading ratios of filler melted before and after melting (Figure1).Figure 1
Schematic diagram for the measurement of brazeability.The solidified composite filler (0.3 g approx.) was mixed with Nocolok flux (10 : 1 ratio) and placed over the substrate (30 mm × 30 mm × 2 mm) at 920°C. After a gap of 30 s, the filler was melted completely over the substrate. The spreading ratio (S) was estimated from the difference in the spread ratios before and after experiment [28].


## 2.5. Melting Point

The effect of CeO2 nanoparticles on the melting behavior of composite fillers was studied by using differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) apparatus (NETZSCH STA 449 F1). About 6–8 mg of specimens were heated in Al2O3 pans from 28 to 1000°C at a heating rate of 10°C/minute under the Ar atmosphere to minimize air oxidation.


## 2.6. Joint Fabrication

The composite filler was rolled down to a thickness of 0.25 mm and then applied between ZrO2 and Ti-6Al-4V alloy in a lap-joint structure. The whole assembly was brazed at 980°C for 10 min in a vacuum furnace at 5 × 10−6 Torr, as shown in the lap-joint structure in Figure 2.Figure 2
Schematic diagram for brazed joint fabrication.


## 2.7. Microstructure

The phase evolution and structure were determined by using X-ray diffractometer (XRD) from Bruker’s D8 Advance, Germany, at operating parameters of 40 mA and 40 kV and copper target (λ = 0.154 nm). The surface morphology of the developed composite fillers and joint cross section were examined in a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, Hitachi, Japan). To observe the distinct features of the interface, the joint cross section was etched by using an aqueous solution of FeCl3, H2O, HCl, and C2H5OH. The compositional analyses of the IMCs and phases were done by using the EDS detector attached to the FE-SEM.


## 2.8. Filler Microhardness

Microhardness of the developed composite fillers was measured by using a Vickers’ microhardness tester (VMHT-6, Leica). The testing parameters include an applied load of 25 gf for a dwell time of 20 s, respectively. The microhardness was automatically calculated and displayed over the display panel of the machine.


## 2.9. Brazing Joint Performance: Shear Test

The shear strength of the joint was estimated according to the JIS Z 3192 standard [29]. The testing was done by employing a universal testing machine (5 ton UTM, DUT-30000 CM, DK Eng., Korea) at a crosshead speed of 3 mm/minute. The schematic of the set-up used for the shear test is shown in Figure 3.Figure 3
Schematic diagram for the shear test.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Reinforcement

Figure4(a) shows the XRD pattern of the CeO2 powder (according to ICDD#00-034-0394) obtained after solution combustion synthesis [30]. The peak broadening indicates the nanocrystallinity of the powder with an increased lattice strain. The average crystallite size (D) of the powder particles is given by the Scherer equation [27]:(1)D=0.9λBcosθ.Figure 4
(a) XRD pattern (according to ICDD#00-034-0394) and (b) morphology of the ceria nanoparticles. The inset shows the EDS analysis of produced ceria nanopowder.
(a)
(b)In general, the XRD peak broadening is governed by various factors such as the instrumental effects, crystallite size, and lattice strain. Here,λ is the wavelength of X-rays, θ is the Bragg angle, and B is the line broadening at full-width half-maximum intensity calculated from the broadening of a standard stress-free sample and instrumental broadening contributions, given by(2)B=Bstandard2−Binstrumental2.The contribution to lattice strain is given by a modified Scherer equation:(3)Bcosθ=0.9λD+εsinθ.The crystallite sizeD can be calculated from the peaks in the XRD pattern, and the average value of lattice strain was determined from the intercept at cos θ = 0 and the slope of B cos θ versus sin θ.The crystallite size was found to lie in the range of 20–30 nm with the average lattice strain of CeO2 powder around 0.39. It is to be noted that as the particle size reduces, the number of surface atoms increases as compared to the bulk. This increase in the surface atoms per unit volume raises the lattice strain which is associated with the structural distortion. This results in high reactivity of the particles at nanoscale level.The morphology of the CeO2 powder particles (Figure 4(b)) is like loose spongy type which is a typical morphology obtained for combustion synthesized powder [27]. This type of structure is already observed in the past by several researchers. The EDS analysis in the inset of Figure 4(b) confirms the composition of the CeO2 powder nanopowder.


### 3.2. Composite Phase and Microstructure

Figure5 shows the XRD pattern of Ag-Cu-Ti-xCeO2 composite fillers. The results indicated various peaks in the XRD spectrum. The phases detected were Ag (ICDD# 01-071-3752), Cu (ICDD#00-004-0836), Cu2Ti (ICDD# 00-020-0371), and Cu4Ti (ICDD# 00-020-0370) diffraction peaks [30]. The X-ray patterns of other samples were almost similar. There was no indication of the formation of new phases related to CeO2 which indicated that there is no reaction of the filler matrix with the reinforcement particles (Figure 5(a)). The CeO2 particles were not present in the XRD spectrum which could be attributed to a very low amount of CeO2 nanoparticles to be detected by the XRD analysis.Figure 5
(a) XRD pattern of Ag-Cu-Ti-xCeO2 (x = 0.1 wt.%) and (b–e) morphology of the Ag-Cu-Ti-xCeO2 filler, x = 0, 0.03, 0.05, and 0.1 wt%. (f) EDS analysis of different phases in (b) and (d).The different morphology of the composite fillers is shown in Figures5(b)–5(e). We can see that the addition of CeO2 nanoparticles has a great effect on the filler morphology. The corresponding phases were analyzed by the EDS, as shown in Figures 5(b)–5(d) and 5(f). The bright and dark phases are shown by spots 1 and 2, while Cu-Ti IMCs are distributed across the interface (spot 3), as shown in Figure 5(f). The EDS analysis results given in Table 2 also show the probable compositions of the phases of spots 1–3.Table 2
EDS data of different phases in Figures5(b)–5(d).
Serial no.
Sample ID
Cu (at.%)
Ag (at.%)
Ti (at.%)
Phase
1
Point 1
36.41
63.59
Ag-Cu
2
Point 2
100.00
0
Cu
3
Point 3
31.72
1.48
66.8
Cu2TiAfter the addition of CeO2 nanoparticles, the Ag- and Cu-rich regions were found to be smaller up to the addition of 0.03 wt% CeO2. In other words, there is a refinement in the microstructure of the filler alloy. Generally, the morphology of the composite filler is refined by the addition of nanoparticles into the filler matrix. There are various theories proposed in the past that explain the effect of nanoparticles on composite morphology. According to the absorption theory of surface-active materials [8–11], addition of nanoparticles decreases the surface-free energy of the crystal plane where maximum adsorption of nanoparticle occurs. More precisely, the amount of adsorption of nanoparticles per unit area of jth plane is given by the following equation:(4)Γj=−CRTdγjdC,where RT represents the thermal energy/mole, C is the concentration of nanoparticles, and γj represents the surface energy/area of the jth plane before the adsorption of nanoparticles. After integration of equation (4), we get(5)γCj=γ0j−RT∫0CΓjCdC,where γCj represents surface energy/area of jth plane after adsorption of nanoparticles and γ0j is the surface energy/area of the jth plane before adsorption. The resultant surface energy is given from equation (5):(6)∑jAkγkj=∑jγ0j−RT∫0CΓjCdCAk,where Aj represents the surface area of jth plane and ∑jAkγ0j is independent of concentration. Therefore, surface energy will be minimum when RT∫0CΓj/CdC is maximized [8–13]. Thus, the growth velocity of a particular plane, j, will be decreased. Since the size of CeO2 is around 20–30 nm, the size of the IMCs is of the order of several micrometers. As a result, the nanoparticles can be adsorbed easily to the IMC plane and restrict their growth.Another theory for the effect of nanoparticles on morphology says that nanoparticles act as nucleating agents, and, therefore they increase more nucleation sites in the matrix as well as on the IMCs during solidification [8–13]. Therefore, according to the aforementioned theories, the presence of an optimum amount of nanoparticles into the filler matrix will promote the grain and IMC refinement of the filler.However, forx = 0.1 wt%, the filler microstructure shows the presence of a few cracks (Figure 5(e)). This may be due to the high amount of CeO2 nanoparticles getting segregated in due course, and localized cracking was noticed [9–11]. It has been reported by many researchers that high surface-active nanoparticles have a tendency of agglomeration. When the nanoparticle content increases in the matrix (x ≥ 0.05 wt%), the interparticle distance among them decreases and they tend to segregate in the matrix. This localized segregation results in buildup of porosity and cracks may form in the joint after solidification [11–13].


### 3.3. Brazeability

Wettability of Ag-Cu-Ti-xCeO2 filler on the ZrO2 and Ti-6Al-4V substrates is shown in Figure 6. It was observed that the spreading ratio rises continuously with the increase in CeO2 fraction in the filler. When the content of CeO2 was more than 0.05 wt%, the spreading ratio drops considerably and the spreadability of composite filler was decreased. The spreading ratio of the pure Ag-Cu-Ti was approximately 89% on Ti-6Al-4V and 83% on zirconia, which approached to a maximum of 98% on Ti-6Al-4V and 89% on zirconia. The spread ratio though decreased severely with the further addition of CeO2 nanoparticles reaching up to 87% on Ti-6Al-4V but only 76% on zirconia side. This can be correlated with the presence of high surface energy ceria nanoparticles which depress the surface tension of the filler and enhance the wetting [20]. However, at a high amount of ceria nanoparticles in the matrix, the viscosity of the filler increases and therefore wetting decreases instead of the presence of the active Ti element [20].Figure 6
Spreading ratio of various Ag-Cu-Ti-xCeO2 composites on Ti-6Al-4V and ZrO2 substrates.It is also noted that, in spite of a higher spreading ratio on Ti-6Al-4V, it decreased up to some extent on zirconia substrates. This is obvious due to the presence of strong covalent bonding in zirconia ceramics compared to the metallic ones in metal. It can be concluded that the addition of an optimum amount of CeO2 nanoparticles (0.05 wt%) enhances the spreading well on both zirconia as well as Ti-6Al-4V substrates.


### 3.4. Melting Point

Figure7 represents DSC curves of the produced composite fillers Ag-Cu-Ti-xCeO2. Only one sharp melting peak is noticed. The melting point of Ag falls near 961.8°C. The phase diagram of Ag-Cu shows the melting point of Ag-Cu lying near 779°C. Although Ti and CeO2 components are present, the onset melting point lies around the eutectic melting point 781–778°C. The melting point of Ag-Cu-Ti-xCeO2 fillers is slightly higher but falls within the normal working limits of brazing. The various onset melting points and peak melting temperature of the composite fillers are shown in Table 3.Figure 7
Melting point behavior of various Ag-Cu-Ti-xCeO2 composites: (a) x = 0; (b) x = 0.03; (c) x = 0.05; (d) x = 0.1.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Table 3
Various temperatures obtained from the melting curve of fillers.
Serial no.
Sample ID
T
onset m.p. (°C)
T
peak (°C)
1
Ag-Cu-Ti
781.2
786.5
2
Ag-Cu-Ti-0.03 CeO2
779.1
784.8
3
Ag-Cu-Ti-0.05 CeO2
778.3
783.1
4
Ag-Cu-Ti-0.1 CeO2
778.8
785.6The filler alloy (x = 0) has a peak melting point at 786.5°C which changes to 784.8°C and 783.1°C for composite fillers with x = 0.03 CeO2 and x = 0.05 CeO2. The difference between the onset melting point (solidus) and peak melting (liquidus), the so-called pasty range, is very narrow (<10°C). A narrow pasty range has been reported to benefit the joining process as it avoids the defects like porosity and/or hot tear that occurs during thermal fluctuations [20, 21]. In other words, the change in the melting point of Ag-Cu-Ti-xCeO2 composites is not high enough to bring any change in service temperature conditions.


### 3.5. Microstructure of the ZrO2/Ti-6Al-4V Joint

Figures8(a)–8(d) show the SEM image of the ZrO2/Ti-6Al-4V interface brazed at 980°C. The interface zone is composed of several black and white patches. The interfacial elements were identified by the EDS analysis (Figure 8(e)). The spot 1 shows a fine layer near the Ti-6Al-4V side. The white and black phases (spots 2 and 3) correspond to the Ag- and Cu-rich phases. The at.% of Cu/Ti ratios were about 1 : 2 (23.95%: 51.16%) at spot 1a and 1 : 4 (14.26%: 49.34%) at spot 1b, respectively. This indicates the IMCs are composed of Cu2Ti + Cu4Ti. Also, Ag (79.37%) and Cu (84.28%) were mainly detected in spot 2 (white color) and 3 (black color).Figure 8
The cross-sectional SEM image of the ZrO2/Ti-6Al-4V interface brazed using various Ag-Cu-Ti-xCeO2 composites: (a) x = 0; (b) x = 0.03; (c) x = 0.05; (d) x = 0.1; (e) EDS analysis of (d).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)Ti was prominent near the interface as shown although it existed a little across the interface. A thick layer of Cu2Ti is present near the Ti-6Al-4V which is related to the diffusion of Ti from Ti-6Al-4V and Cu from the filler metal to form an excellent bond [4]. The IMC thicknesses of Ag-Cu-Ti filler (x = 0 and 0.03) are 18.5 and 22.8 μm. The IMC thickness for x = 0.03 is higher as compared to x = 0. The reason can be a very small amount which is not sufficient enough to minimize the IMCs considerably in the matrix. The thickness of this layer is different for each condition being minimum (12.4 μm) at x = 0.05. Also, the thickness of the interfacial layer is on a little higher side (15.4 μm) for x = 0.1 compared to 12.4 μm (x = 0.05) (Figures 8(c) and 8(d)). This might be due to a higher thickness of Cu4Ti along with Cu2Ti IMCs at the interface which weakens the bonding. The mechanism of joint formation can be understood by the model presented in Figure 9.Figure 9
Schematic for joint formation and bonding of the ZrO2/Ti-6Al-4V joint.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The reaction proceeds in various steps. During brazing, when the temperature is above the solidus of the filler, various elements diffuse to each other across the interface (Figures9(a) and 9(b)). The filler melts, and then Ti is dissolved into the molten filler and interacts with Cu atoms. Ag occupies the solid solution matrix of the filler. The Cu-Ti IMCs nucleate at the boundaries (Figure 9(c)). The IMC form and grow in due course simultaneously between titanium and ZrO2. ZrO2 is bonded under the influence of Ti which is absorbed in the surface pores through capillary action at the ZrO2 surface (Figures 9(c)–9(d)). The CeO2 nanoparticles are attached to the IMCs and prevent their further growth, as shown by thickness measured from the joint SEM in previous section.


### 3.6. Microhardness

The microhardness values of Ag-Cu-Ti-xCeO2 composite fillers are given in Table 4. It is seen that the microhardness increases from 115.1 to 126.6 Hv when the CeO2 content in the filler matrix rises from 0 to 0.05 wt%. This shows a reasonable increase in hardness (11.5%) of the filler matrix. This increase in microhardness value can be ascribed to the fine microstructure containing finer IMCs and Cu- and Ag-rich phases in the Ag-Cu-Ti matrix [31, 32]. The presence of an optimum amount of harder CeO2 (0.05 wt%) particles in the matrix results in the hindrance of localized plastic deformation of the matrix when CeO2 particles are present.Table 4
Microhardness values of composite fillers as a function of CeO2 (wt%).
Serial no.
Sample ID
Microhardness (Hv)
1
Ag-Cu-Ti
115.1
2
Ag-Cu-Ti-0.03 CeO2
119.4
3
Ag-Cu-Ti-0.05 CeO2
126.6
4
Ag-Cu-Ti-0.1 CeO2
112.5A further decrease in hardness (112.5 Hv) is also noticed when 0.1 wt% CeO2 is added into the filler matrix. Generally, at a high concentration of nanoparticles, the sample hardness should be higher. However, due to high surface energy of CeO2 nanoparticles, their mixing in the filler powder is not uniform and their incorporation is poor in the solidified melt. Therefore, the hardness decrease is associated with two factors: (1) presence of cracks in the sample and (2) poor incorporation of the CeO2 nanoparticles in the filler matrix at high concentration. This may be due to the increased viscosity and poor wetting of CeO2 nanoparticles in the melt beyond x > 0.05 wt% [11].


### 3.7. Brazed Joint Shear Strength

The joint shear strength was performed for various composite fillers (x = 0, 0.03, 0.05, and 0.1). The shear stress-strain diagram is shown in Figure 10. The various shear stress data are shown in Table 5.Figure 10
Shear stress-strain curves of the various Ag-Cu-Ti-xCeO2 composites.Table 5
Shear strength data obtained from the shear stress-strain curve.
Serial no.
Sample ID
UTS (MPa)
1
Ag-Cu-Ti
19.9
2
Ag-Cu-Ti-0.03 CeO2
20.4
3
Ag-Cu-Ti-0.05 CeO2
22.8
4
Ag-Cu-Ti-0.1 CeO2
12.6It can be seen that the joint shear strength increases with the addition of CeO2 nanoparticles up to 0.05 wt% in the filler matrix. The sample brazed with filler with x = 0 shows a shear strength of ∼19.9 MPa. The stress increases gradually to 20.4 MPa and 22.8 MPa for the case of x = 0.03 and 0.05 respectively. The improvement in joint strength at an optimum content of CeO2 (0.05 wt%) can be attributed to the various factors: (1) presence of harder CeO2 nanoparticles that obstruct the localized deformation of the matrix, (2) CeO2 nanoparticles restrict the growth of Cu-Ti IMCs in the filler matrix, and (3) Orowan strengthening due to dislocations form loops around the fine IMCs and CeO2 particles [8, 11, 13].The shear strength is decreased to 12.6 MPa forx = 0.1, as expected. This may be due to the poor spreadability of this sample as already discussed [9–11]. A very high amount of CeO2 nanoparticles (0.1 wt%) is not desirable in the Ag-Cu-Ti matrix because it may deteriorate the joint microstructure and strength. This may be due to the high amount of ceria nanoparticles in the melt that decreases the melt fluidity and spreadability [11]. Therefore, it can be concluded from this work that, for an optimum brazing performance of the ZrO2/Ti-6A-4V joint, the desired amount of CeO2 nanoparticles should not exceed ∼0.05 wt% in the Ag-Cu-Ti filler matrix.


## 3.1. Reinforcement

Figure4(a) shows the XRD pattern of the CeO2 powder (according to ICDD#00-034-0394) obtained after solution combustion synthesis [30]. The peak broadening indicates the nanocrystallinity of the powder with an increased lattice strain. The average crystallite size (D) of the powder particles is given by the Scherer equation [27]:(1)D=0.9λBcosθ.Figure 4
(a) XRD pattern (according to ICDD#00-034-0394) and (b) morphology of the ceria nanoparticles. The inset shows the EDS analysis of produced ceria nanopowder.
(a)
(b)In general, the XRD peak broadening is governed by various factors such as the instrumental effects, crystallite size, and lattice strain. Here,λ is the wavelength of X-rays, θ is the Bragg angle, and B is the line broadening at full-width half-maximum intensity calculated from the broadening of a standard stress-free sample and instrumental broadening contributions, given by(2)B=Bstandard2−Binstrumental2.The contribution to lattice strain is given by a modified Scherer equation:(3)Bcosθ=0.9λD+εsinθ.The crystallite sizeD can be calculated from the peaks in the XRD pattern, and the average value of lattice strain was determined from the intercept at cos θ = 0 and the slope of B cos θ versus sin θ.The crystallite size was found to lie in the range of 20–30 nm with the average lattice strain of CeO2 powder around 0.39. It is to be noted that as the particle size reduces, the number of surface atoms increases as compared to the bulk. This increase in the surface atoms per unit volume raises the lattice strain which is associated with the structural distortion. This results in high reactivity of the particles at nanoscale level.The morphology of the CeO2 powder particles (Figure 4(b)) is like loose spongy type which is a typical morphology obtained for combustion synthesized powder [27]. This type of structure is already observed in the past by several researchers. The EDS analysis in the inset of Figure 4(b) confirms the composition of the CeO2 powder nanopowder.


## 3.2. Composite Phase and Microstructure

Figure5 shows the XRD pattern of Ag-Cu-Ti-xCeO2 composite fillers. The results indicated various peaks in the XRD spectrum. The phases detected were Ag (ICDD# 01-071-3752), Cu (ICDD#00-004-0836), Cu2Ti (ICDD# 00-020-0371), and Cu4Ti (ICDD# 00-020-0370) diffraction peaks [30]. The X-ray patterns of other samples were almost similar. There was no indication of the formation of new phases related to CeO2 which indicated that there is no reaction of the filler matrix with the reinforcement particles (Figure 5(a)). The CeO2 particles were not present in the XRD spectrum which could be attributed to a very low amount of CeO2 nanoparticles to be detected by the XRD analysis.Figure 5
(a) XRD pattern of Ag-Cu-Ti-xCeO2 (x = 0.1 wt.%) and (b–e) morphology of the Ag-Cu-Ti-xCeO2 filler, x = 0, 0.03, 0.05, and 0.1 wt%. (f) EDS analysis of different phases in (b) and (d).The different morphology of the composite fillers is shown in Figures5(b)–5(e). We can see that the addition of CeO2 nanoparticles has a great effect on the filler morphology. The corresponding phases were analyzed by the EDS, as shown in Figures 5(b)–5(d) and 5(f). The bright and dark phases are shown by spots 1 and 2, while Cu-Ti IMCs are distributed across the interface (spot 3), as shown in Figure 5(f). The EDS analysis results given in Table 2 also show the probable compositions of the phases of spots 1–3.Table 2
EDS data of different phases in Figures5(b)–5(d).
Serial no.
Sample ID
Cu (at.%)
Ag (at.%)
Ti (at.%)
Phase
1
Point 1
36.41
63.59
Ag-Cu
2
Point 2
100.00
0
Cu
3
Point 3
31.72
1.48
66.8
Cu2TiAfter the addition of CeO2 nanoparticles, the Ag- and Cu-rich regions were found to be smaller up to the addition of 0.03 wt% CeO2. In other words, there is a refinement in the microstructure of the filler alloy. Generally, the morphology of the composite filler is refined by the addition of nanoparticles into the filler matrix. There are various theories proposed in the past that explain the effect of nanoparticles on composite morphology. According to the absorption theory of surface-active materials [8–11], addition of nanoparticles decreases the surface-free energy of the crystal plane where maximum adsorption of nanoparticle occurs. More precisely, the amount of adsorption of nanoparticles per unit area of jth plane is given by the following equation:(4)Γj=−CRTdγjdC,where RT represents the thermal energy/mole, C is the concentration of nanoparticles, and γj represents the surface energy/area of the jth plane before the adsorption of nanoparticles. After integration of equation (4), we get(5)γCj=γ0j−RT∫0CΓjCdC,where γCj represents surface energy/area of jth plane after adsorption of nanoparticles and γ0j is the surface energy/area of the jth plane before adsorption. The resultant surface energy is given from equation (5):(6)∑jAkγkj=∑jγ0j−RT∫0CΓjCdCAk,where Aj represents the surface area of jth plane and ∑jAkγ0j is independent of concentration. Therefore, surface energy will be minimum when RT∫0CΓj/CdC is maximized [8–13]. Thus, the growth velocity of a particular plane, j, will be decreased. Since the size of CeO2 is around 20–30 nm, the size of the IMCs is of the order of several micrometers. As a result, the nanoparticles can be adsorbed easily to the IMC plane and restrict their growth.Another theory for the effect of nanoparticles on morphology says that nanoparticles act as nucleating agents, and, therefore they increase more nucleation sites in the matrix as well as on the IMCs during solidification [8–13]. Therefore, according to the aforementioned theories, the presence of an optimum amount of nanoparticles into the filler matrix will promote the grain and IMC refinement of the filler.However, forx = 0.1 wt%, the filler microstructure shows the presence of a few cracks (Figure 5(e)). This may be due to the high amount of CeO2 nanoparticles getting segregated in due course, and localized cracking was noticed [9–11]. It has been reported by many researchers that high surface-active nanoparticles have a tendency of agglomeration. When the nanoparticle content increases in the matrix (x ≥ 0.05 wt%), the interparticle distance among them decreases and they tend to segregate in the matrix. This localized segregation results in buildup of porosity and cracks may form in the joint after solidification [11–13].


## 3.3. Brazeability

Wettability of Ag-Cu-Ti-xCeO2 filler on the ZrO2 and Ti-6Al-4V substrates is shown in Figure 6. It was observed that the spreading ratio rises continuously with the increase in CeO2 fraction in the filler. When the content of CeO2 was more than 0.05 wt%, the spreading ratio drops considerably and the spreadability of composite filler was decreased. The spreading ratio of the pure Ag-Cu-Ti was approximately 89% on Ti-6Al-4V and 83% on zirconia, which approached to a maximum of 98% on Ti-6Al-4V and 89% on zirconia. The spread ratio though decreased severely with the further addition of CeO2 nanoparticles reaching up to 87% on Ti-6Al-4V but only 76% on zirconia side. This can be correlated with the presence of high surface energy ceria nanoparticles which depress the surface tension of the filler and enhance the wetting [20]. However, at a high amount of ceria nanoparticles in the matrix, the viscosity of the filler increases and therefore wetting decreases instead of the presence of the active Ti element [20].Figure 6
Spreading ratio of various Ag-Cu-Ti-xCeO2 composites on Ti-6Al-4V and ZrO2 substrates.It is also noted that, in spite of a higher spreading ratio on Ti-6Al-4V, it decreased up to some extent on zirconia substrates. This is obvious due to the presence of strong covalent bonding in zirconia ceramics compared to the metallic ones in metal. It can be concluded that the addition of an optimum amount of CeO2 nanoparticles (0.05 wt%) enhances the spreading well on both zirconia as well as Ti-6Al-4V substrates.


## 3.4. Melting Point

Figure7 represents DSC curves of the produced composite fillers Ag-Cu-Ti-xCeO2. Only one sharp melting peak is noticed. The melting point of Ag falls near 961.8°C. The phase diagram of Ag-Cu shows the melting point of Ag-Cu lying near 779°C. Although Ti and CeO2 components are present, the onset melting point lies around the eutectic melting point 781–778°C. The melting point of Ag-Cu-Ti-xCeO2 fillers is slightly higher but falls within the normal working limits of brazing. The various onset melting points and peak melting temperature of the composite fillers are shown in Table 3.Figure 7
Melting point behavior of various Ag-Cu-Ti-xCeO2 composites: (a) x = 0; (b) x = 0.03; (c) x = 0.05; (d) x = 0.1.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Table 3
Various temperatures obtained from the melting curve of fillers.
Serial no.
Sample ID
T
onset m.p. (°C)
T
peak (°C)
1
Ag-Cu-Ti
781.2
786.5
2
Ag-Cu-Ti-0.03 CeO2
779.1
784.8
3
Ag-Cu-Ti-0.05 CeO2
778.3
783.1
4
Ag-Cu-Ti-0.1 CeO2
778.8
785.6The filler alloy (x = 0) has a peak melting point at 786.5°C which changes to 784.8°C and 783.1°C for composite fillers with x = 0.03 CeO2 and x = 0.05 CeO2. The difference between the onset melting point (solidus) and peak melting (liquidus), the so-called pasty range, is very narrow (<10°C). A narrow pasty range has been reported to benefit the joining process as it avoids the defects like porosity and/or hot tear that occurs during thermal fluctuations [20, 21]. In other words, the change in the melting point of Ag-Cu-Ti-xCeO2 composites is not high enough to bring any change in service temperature conditions.


## 3.5. Microstructure of the ZrO2/Ti-6Al-4V Joint

Figures8(a)–8(d) show the SEM image of the ZrO2/Ti-6Al-4V interface brazed at 980°C. The interface zone is composed of several black and white patches. The interfacial elements were identified by the EDS analysis (Figure 8(e)). The spot 1 shows a fine layer near the Ti-6Al-4V side. The white and black phases (spots 2 and 3) correspond to the Ag- and Cu-rich phases. The at.% of Cu/Ti ratios were about 1 : 2 (23.95%: 51.16%) at spot 1a and 1 : 4 (14.26%: 49.34%) at spot 1b, respectively. This indicates the IMCs are composed of Cu2Ti + Cu4Ti. Also, Ag (79.37%) and Cu (84.28%) were mainly detected in spot 2 (white color) and 3 (black color).Figure 8
The cross-sectional SEM image of the ZrO2/Ti-6Al-4V interface brazed using various Ag-Cu-Ti-xCeO2 composites: (a) x = 0; (b) x = 0.03; (c) x = 0.05; (d) x = 0.1; (e) EDS analysis of (d).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)Ti was prominent near the interface as shown although it existed a little across the interface. A thick layer of Cu2Ti is present near the Ti-6Al-4V which is related to the diffusion of Ti from Ti-6Al-4V and Cu from the filler metal to form an excellent bond [4]. The IMC thicknesses of Ag-Cu-Ti filler (x = 0 and 0.03) are 18.5 and 22.8 μm. The IMC thickness for x = 0.03 is higher as compared to x = 0. The reason can be a very small amount which is not sufficient enough to minimize the IMCs considerably in the matrix. The thickness of this layer is different for each condition being minimum (12.4 μm) at x = 0.05. Also, the thickness of the interfacial layer is on a little higher side (15.4 μm) for x = 0.1 compared to 12.4 μm (x = 0.05) (Figures 8(c) and 8(d)). This might be due to a higher thickness of Cu4Ti along with Cu2Ti IMCs at the interface which weakens the bonding. The mechanism of joint formation can be understood by the model presented in Figure 9.Figure 9
Schematic for joint formation and bonding of the ZrO2/Ti-6Al-4V joint.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The reaction proceeds in various steps. During brazing, when the temperature is above the solidus of the filler, various elements diffuse to each other across the interface (Figures9(a) and 9(b)). The filler melts, and then Ti is dissolved into the molten filler and interacts with Cu atoms. Ag occupies the solid solution matrix of the filler. The Cu-Ti IMCs nucleate at the boundaries (Figure 9(c)). The IMC form and grow in due course simultaneously between titanium and ZrO2. ZrO2 is bonded under the influence of Ti which is absorbed in the surface pores through capillary action at the ZrO2 surface (Figures 9(c)–9(d)). The CeO2 nanoparticles are attached to the IMCs and prevent their further growth, as shown by thickness measured from the joint SEM in previous section.


## 3.6. Microhardness

The microhardness values of Ag-Cu-Ti-xCeO2 composite fillers are given in Table 4. It is seen that the microhardness increases from 115.1 to 126.6 Hv when the CeO2 content in the filler matrix rises from 0 to 0.05 wt%. This shows a reasonable increase in hardness (11.5%) of the filler matrix. This increase in microhardness value can be ascribed to the fine microstructure containing finer IMCs and Cu- and Ag-rich phases in the Ag-Cu-Ti matrix [31, 32]. The presence of an optimum amount of harder CeO2 (0.05 wt%) particles in the matrix results in the hindrance of localized plastic deformation of the matrix when CeO2 particles are present.Table 4
Microhardness values of composite fillers as a function of CeO2 (wt%).
Serial no.
Sample ID
Microhardness (Hv)
1
Ag-Cu-Ti
115.1
2
Ag-Cu-Ti-0.03 CeO2
119.4
3
Ag-Cu-Ti-0.05 CeO2
126.6
4
Ag-Cu-Ti-0.1 CeO2
112.5A further decrease in hardness (112.5 Hv) is also noticed when 0.1 wt% CeO2 is added into the filler matrix. Generally, at a high concentration of nanoparticles, the sample hardness should be higher. However, due to high surface energy of CeO2 nanoparticles, their mixing in the filler powder is not uniform and their incorporation is poor in the solidified melt. Therefore, the hardness decrease is associated with two factors: (1) presence of cracks in the sample and (2) poor incorporation of the CeO2 nanoparticles in the filler matrix at high concentration. This may be due to the increased viscosity and poor wetting of CeO2 nanoparticles in the melt beyond x > 0.05 wt% [11].


## 3.7. Brazed Joint Shear Strength

The joint shear strength was performed for various composite fillers (x = 0, 0.03, 0.05, and 0.1). The shear stress-strain diagram is shown in Figure 10. The various shear stress data are shown in Table 5.Figure 10
Shear stress-strain curves of the various Ag-Cu-Ti-xCeO2 composites.Table 5
Shear strength data obtained from the shear stress-strain curve.
Serial no.
Sample ID
UTS (MPa)
1
Ag-Cu-Ti
19.9
2
Ag-Cu-Ti-0.03 CeO2
20.4
3
Ag-Cu-Ti-0.05 CeO2
22.8
4
Ag-Cu-Ti-0.1 CeO2
12.6It can be seen that the joint shear strength increases with the addition of CeO2 nanoparticles up to 0.05 wt% in the filler matrix. The sample brazed with filler with x = 0 shows a shear strength of ∼19.9 MPa. The stress increases gradually to 20.4 MPa and 22.8 MPa for the case of x = 0.03 and 0.05 respectively. The improvement in joint strength at an optimum content of CeO2 (0.05 wt%) can be attributed to the various factors: (1) presence of harder CeO2 nanoparticles that obstruct the localized deformation of the matrix, (2) CeO2 nanoparticles restrict the growth of Cu-Ti IMCs in the filler matrix, and (3) Orowan strengthening due to dislocations form loops around the fine IMCs and CeO2 particles [8, 11, 13].The shear strength is decreased to 12.6 MPa forx = 0.1, as expected. This may be due to the poor spreadability of this sample as already discussed [9–11]. A very high amount of CeO2 nanoparticles (0.1 wt%) is not desirable in the Ag-Cu-Ti matrix because it may deteriorate the joint microstructure and strength. This may be due to the high amount of ceria nanoparticles in the melt that decreases the melt fluidity and spreadability [11]. Therefore, it can be concluded from this work that, for an optimum brazing performance of the ZrO2/Ti-6A-4V joint, the desired amount of CeO2 nanoparticles should not exceed ∼0.05 wt% in the Ag-Cu-Ti filler matrix.


## 4. Conclusions

(1)
The cerium oxide nanoparticles were successfully produced using the solution combustion method. The particle size of the ceria nanoparticles was under 20–30 nm, and lattice strain was around 0.39.
(2)
The Ag-Cu-Ti filler microstructure was composed of Cu-rich and Ag-rich phases and Cu-Ti IMCs. It was found that, with an addition of ceria in the filler matrix (up to 0.05 wt%), the various phases were refined considerably.
(3)
The addition of CeO2 nanoparticles in the filler matrix improved the wettability of filler on both ZrO2 and Ti-6Al-4V substrates up to x = 0.05 and then decreased dramatically at x = 0.1 due to increasing melt viscosity.
(4)
The melting point study shows a depression in the melting point of composite fillers around 3°C when reinforced with 0.05 wt% CeO2.
(5)
With the increase in the CeO2 content, the thickness of the reactive layer (Cu2Ti + Cu4Ti) between the interface and base materials was reduced significantly up to the optimum ceria fraction 0.05 wt% in the filler matrix.
(6)
The microhardness of the filler matrix shows an 11.1% increase over the filler matrix when embedded with 0.05 wt% ceria nanoparticles.
(7)
The joint shear test showed that maximum brazed strength was obtained forx = 0.05; however, it decreased further due to the poor brazeability of filler at x = 0.1.



---

*Source: 8602632-2019-12-12.xml*