# Determination and Quantification of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural in Vinegars and Soy Sauces

Authors: Li-Li Zhang; Ying Sun; Yu-Yu Zhang; Bao-Guo Sun; Hai-Tao Chen
Journal: Journal of Food Quality
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

The organic compound 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) can be formed from sugars under Maillard reaction and caramelization. In order to study the formation regular of HMF in sugary liquid condiment, vinegar and soy sauce were selected. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to determine the HMF concentrations of various brands of soy sauce and vinegar. The result showed that HMF concentrations were in a range of 0.42 to 115.43 mg/kg for vinegar samples and 0.43 to 5.85 mg/kg for soy sauce samples. The concentrates of HMF were expressed in zero-order kinetics model at 100°C before the maximum HMF generation in all of the tested samples. Longer heating treatment time would reduce the HMF content in tested samples. In addition, HMF content had obviously positive correlation with sugar contents in vinegar samples, but no similar rule was found in soy sauces.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

As typical representatives of liquid condiment, vinegar and soy sauce have gained lots of acceptance and popularity over China for hundred years due to their unique qualities [1].Vinegar can be fermented from various materials such as rice, glutinous rice, and sorghum. After two steps of fermentation, alcoholic fermentation and acetic fermentation, vinegar was produced [2]. Research has suggested that acetic acid is the main ingredient in vinegar, which gives it an acidic taste [3]. Vinegar is extensively used worldwide as a condiment, acidulant, and food preservative [4]. Every year over 26 million hectoliters of vinegar is produced and more than 3.2 million liters of vinegar is consumed every day in China [5].Soy sauce is a fermented soybean food. According to the method of manufacture, the naturally brewed method and the acid hydrolysis method were classified [6]. Although the acid hydrolysis method makes the production of soy sauce very cheap, fermented soy sauce was more popular due to its intense umami taste, characteristic aroma, and nutritional value. During the fermentation process, soy protein is enzymatically degraded to amino acids, including glutamic acid and aspartic acid, and wheat polysaccharides are enzymatically degraded to monosaccharides, including glucose [1]. What is more, soy sauce usually contains added caramel, in some cases molasses, to give it a distinctive appearance [7]. The finished product was pasteurized at a rather high temperature (80°C) [8].5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), a food contaminant produced by caramelization and Maillard reaction, is considered as a potential carcinogen for humans (Zou and others 2015). The previous literature has shown that it was concluded that sugary food heated under household cooking conditions could act as an initiator and promoter of colon cancer because of the presence of HMF [9]. The formations of HMF were inevitable in vinegar and soy sauce, which were seen as essential liquid seasonings for home cooking. Theobald et al. [9] also indicated that it was difficult to estimate the HMF content in commercial samples which was prepared in households.In order to study the formation regular of HMF in liquid condiment, 10 vinegars and 10 soy sauces were selected in the present study, and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to determine the HMF concentrations of all of tested samples. The pH values, moisture levels, and sugar content were investigated, too. This work would provide a promising strategy to reduce the amount of HMF in the thermally treated foodstuffs, in which vinegars and soy sauces were contained.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

All vinegar (A1–A10) and soy sauce (B1–B10) samples are Chinese-style brewed and were best sellers in Chinese markets in 2017. High purity (>99%) HMF standard were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Methanol (HPLC grade) was provided by Thermo Fisher Scientific (USA). Ultrapure water was purchased from Hangzhou Wahaha Group Co., Ltd. Deionized water was obtained in house.


### 2.2. Preparation of Heating Treatment Samples

The samples of 30 g vinegars in 100 mL flask were heated at 100°C from 10 to 60 min, while soy sauces were heated from 20 to 120 min. After the heated time finished, the samples were removed from the bath for determination with HPLC.


### 2.3. Measurement of pH

The pH was measured at 20°C using a Mettler Toledo S40 SevenMulti™ pH meter (Beijing Songxinhongze Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) after appropriately removing the sediment layer. The meter was calibrated with pH 4.0 and 7.0 buffers.


### 2.4. Measurement of Moisture Levels and Sugar Content

Chinese National Standard methods were employed to evaluate the general components of samples. Moisture level was determined by electrothermal constant-temperature blast drying oven (WG9220A) according to the change in weight after drying for 20 h. The sugar content was determined by thermal ion chromatograph (IC-3000) according to the GB/T22221-2008 Chinese National Standard.


### 2.5. HMF Analysis

The analysis of HMF was performed using the method proposed by Gökmen and Şenyuva [10] and Gökmen et al. [11] with modifications. Here, a methanol water solution (5 : 95, v : v) was employed rather than an acetonitrile and acetic acid aqueous solution (10 : 90, v : v), and HMF was well separated at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min.Each of the vinegar and soy sauce samples (20 g) was placed into a 50 mL centrifuge tube and covered with a cap. The sample was maintained continuously at 4°C while being shaken vigorously for 3 min and then centrifuged for 15 min at 9600 rpm. Then the supernatant solution and methanol (v : v, 1 : 1) were mixed and shaken for 3 min. The supernatant solution was filtered through a 0.45µm disk filter and stored at 4°C until conducting the analysis. All experiments were conducted in triplicate.The concentration of HMF was obtained by comparing the retention time value and the UV spectrogram with those of the appropriate standards. The peak area values obtained from the various HMF standards were employed to construct a standard curve, as shown in Figure1(d).Figure 1
(a) A representative standard solution. (b) A representative vinegar sample. (c) A representative soy sauce sample; standard 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) (d) determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) spectrograms (284 nm).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


### 2.6. Statistical Analysis

Analysis of variance (ANOVA), regression analysis (curve fitting), and the calculation of kinetic rate constants were performed using the Microcal Origin 8.0 software (Origin Lab., Northampton, MA, USA). ANOVA test was performed for all experimental runs to determine significance at 95% confidence interval. All experiments were performed in triplicate.


## 2.1. Materials

All vinegar (A1–A10) and soy sauce (B1–B10) samples are Chinese-style brewed and were best sellers in Chinese markets in 2017. High purity (>99%) HMF standard were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Methanol (HPLC grade) was provided by Thermo Fisher Scientific (USA). Ultrapure water was purchased from Hangzhou Wahaha Group Co., Ltd. Deionized water was obtained in house.


## 2.2. Preparation of Heating Treatment Samples

The samples of 30 g vinegars in 100 mL flask were heated at 100°C from 10 to 60 min, while soy sauces were heated from 20 to 120 min. After the heated time finished, the samples were removed from the bath for determination with HPLC.


## 2.3. Measurement of pH

The pH was measured at 20°C using a Mettler Toledo S40 SevenMulti™ pH meter (Beijing Songxinhongze Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) after appropriately removing the sediment layer. The meter was calibrated with pH 4.0 and 7.0 buffers.


## 2.4. Measurement of Moisture Levels and Sugar Content

Chinese National Standard methods were employed to evaluate the general components of samples. Moisture level was determined by electrothermal constant-temperature blast drying oven (WG9220A) according to the change in weight after drying for 20 h. The sugar content was determined by thermal ion chromatograph (IC-3000) according to the GB/T22221-2008 Chinese National Standard.


## 2.5. HMF Analysis

The analysis of HMF was performed using the method proposed by Gökmen and Şenyuva [10] and Gökmen et al. [11] with modifications. Here, a methanol water solution (5 : 95, v : v) was employed rather than an acetonitrile and acetic acid aqueous solution (10 : 90, v : v), and HMF was well separated at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min.Each of the vinegar and soy sauce samples (20 g) was placed into a 50 mL centrifuge tube and covered with a cap. The sample was maintained continuously at 4°C while being shaken vigorously for 3 min and then centrifuged for 15 min at 9600 rpm. Then the supernatant solution and methanol (v : v, 1 : 1) were mixed and shaken for 3 min. The supernatant solution was filtered through a 0.45µm disk filter and stored at 4°C until conducting the analysis. All experiments were conducted in triplicate.The concentration of HMF was obtained by comparing the retention time value and the UV spectrogram with those of the appropriate standards. The peak area values obtained from the various HMF standards were employed to construct a standard curve, as shown in Figure1(d).Figure 1
(a) A representative standard solution. (b) A representative vinegar sample. (c) A representative soy sauce sample; standard 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) (d) determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) spectrograms (284 nm).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 2.6. Statistical Analysis

Analysis of variance (ANOVA), regression analysis (curve fitting), and the calculation of kinetic rate constants were performed using the Microcal Origin 8.0 software (Origin Lab., Northampton, MA, USA). ANOVA test was performed for all experimental runs to determine significance at 95% confidence interval. All experiments were performed in triplicate.


## 3. Results and Discussion

Figures1(a), 1(b), and 1(c) depicted the chromatographic separation of HMF in a representative standard solution and in representative commercial vinegar and soy sauce samples, respectively. The chromatograms clearly indicated that HMF was completely resolved from all other components of the vinegar and soy sauce samples. HMF eluted at approximately (18.899 ± 0.11) min (n=10) with good retention time reproducibility.


### 3.1. pH Value, Sugar, and Moisture Content in Vinegars

The pH, sugar, and moisture content in the vinegar samples were listed in Table1. Vinegar was obtained by a double fermentation process (alcoholic and acetic fermentation) of sugary and starchy substrates [2]. The key ingredient is acetic acid, which gives it an acidic taste, although there may be additions of other kinds of acid like tartaric and citric [12, 13]. Compared with other condiments, vinegar had a lower pH value. As shown in Table 1, the pH value of the 10 vinegars was in the range 2.743–3.598. Although the result of the test was similar to what was reported by Lalou et al. (2.83–3.53) [14], there was significant difference between different tested vinegar samples (p<0.05). There were great variations on moisture content in vinegar samples, too. The highest amount of moisture was 98.292% (sample A10), while the lowest was 89.010% (sample A8). Previous research had shown that not only pH value and moisture content but also varieties and contents of sugar have effects on HMF formation [15–17]. And numerous studies have indicated that fructose is the most reactive sugar relative to sucrose and glucose, in the formation of HMF under acidic conditions [18]. Therefore, sugar content was also considered in this study. In Table 1, the sugar data obtained were listed. The main sugars were glucose and fructose in vinegars. As for sucrose, maltose, and lactose, concentrations were very low in vinegars.Table 1
pH value, sugar, and moisture contents in vinegars and soy sauces.
Sample
Glucose
Fructose
Sucrose
Maltose
Lactose
pH (n=3)
Moisture (%) (n=3)
(%)
Vinegar
—
—
—
A1
—
—
—
—
—
3.317
±
0.003
(
f
)
95.02
8
±
0.000
(
d
)
A2
0.317
—
—
—
—
3.411
±
0.001
(
d
)
94.172
±
0.001
(
g
)
A3
0.547
—
—
—
—
3.385
±
0.001
(
e
)
94.217
±
0.000
(
f
g
)
A4
0.198
—
—
—
—
3.283
±
0.002
(
g
)
95.471
±
0.000
(
c
)
A5
—
—
—
—
—
3.248
±
0.007
(
h
)
97.076
±
0.000
(
b
)
A6
0.126
—
—
—
—
3.598
±
0.002
(
a
)
94.753
±
0.001
(
e
)
A7
0.262
—
—
—
—
3.503
±
0.005
(
b
)
90.745
±
0.001
(
h
)
A8
0.990
0.293
—
—
—
3.478
±
0.001
(
c
)
89.010
±
0.001
(
i
)
A9
0.677
—
—
—
—
3.052
±
0.001
(
i
)
94.309
±
0.000
(
f
)
A10
0.218
0.240
—
—
—
2.743
±
0.004
(
j
)
98.292
±
0.000
(
a
)
Soy sauce
B1
0.933
—
—
—
—
4.620
±
0.006
(
g
)
70.346
±
0.004
(
d
)
B2
0.444
—
—
—
—
4.334
±
0.005
(
j
)
74.543
±
0.001
(
a
)
B3
1.150
0.137
4.310
—
—
4.895
±
0.003
(
d
)
63.518
±
0.001
(
h
)
B4
0.372
—
—
—
—
5.090
±
0.003
(
b
)
68.047
±
0.001
(
e
)
B5
1.180
0.628
0.273
—
—
4.747
±
0.005
(
e
)
71.258
±
0.001
(
c
)
B6
1.180
0.368
—
0.122
—
5.018
±
0.002
(
i
)
67.351
±
0.000
(
b
)
B7
1.380
0.367
—
—
—
4.456
±
0.002
(
h
)
62.267
±
0.001
(
i
)
B8
0.474
—
1.060
—
—
4.669
±
0.001
(
f
)
73.611
±
0.000
(
b
)
B9
0.662
—
—
—
—
5.122
±
0.002
(
a
)
66.595
±
0.000
(
g
)
B10
0.636
—
1.770
—
—
4.362
±
0.001
(
c
)
73.446
±
0.000
(
f
)
Different letters indicate that there was significant difference between different kinds of vinegar or soy sauce in “pH value” or “moisture contents.”


### 3.2. Initial HMF Concentrations of Vinegars

Vinegar has high antioxidant activity, antimicrobial properties, antidiabetic effects, and therapeutic properties [19], which made it widely used as acidic seasoning. As all food matrixes used for the production of vinegar contain sugar, formation of HMF during either the production process or storage is possible.The initial HMF concentrations of the 10 vinegars ranged from 0.42 to 115.43 mg/kg (Figure3(a)). The concentrations of HMF in vinegar samples have been reported by many scholars, and values ranging from 0 mg/kg up to an extremely high value of 14,145 mg/kg have been reported, which was an indicator of different practices exercised by different manufacturers and the lack of consistent process optimization. The range of HMF concentrations for vinegar samples obtained in our study was much lower than that reported by Lalou et al. (211–14,145 mg/kg) [14]. Caligiani et al. [20] reported a range of HMF concentrations of 0–3.38 mg/kg for 105 vinegar samples, and they concluded that their method based on proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy was satisfactory for the quantification of HMF concentration. Bignardi et al. [21] reported a range of HMF concentrations of 0.82–1,153.55 mg/kg for 3 vinegar samples, which was also greater than that obtained in the present study. In addition, the HMF concentrations reported by Masino et al. [22] for 10 vinegars were found to be significantly greater than the values determined by others. Theobald et al. [9] analyzed the HMF content in various kinds of vinegar. They found that balsamic vinegars exhibited very high HMF concentrations of about 300 mg/L, and, depending on their age, the concentrations of HMF ranged upwards to 5.5 g/kg.


### 3.3. HMF Concentrations in Heating Treatment Vinegars

The HMF concentrations in heating treatment vinegars were shown in Figure3(a), while kinetic analyses of HMF were shown in Table 2. As shown in Figure 3(a), it clearly indicated that HMF concentrations in most of vinegars gradually increased with extension of the heating treatment time. However, HMF concentrates in samples A1, A2, A6, and A9 were showing a trend of increasing first and then decreasing. The highest content of HMF in samples A1 and A6 were 58.28 mg/kg and 9.08 mg/kg (40 min), and the HMF content was reduced by 2.93% and 20.70% when continuously heated for 20 min, respectively. In addition, the time (50 min) of the highest content of HMF formed was similar in samples A2 and A9. The HMF contents of them were reduced by 2.10% and 5.96% when continuously heated for 10 min, respectively. Conclusion was drawn that longer heating treatment time would reduce the HMF content, which might be due to the occurrence of the side reactions of HMF. With Table 2 analysis, the data was expressed in zero-order kinetics model at 100°C before the maximum HMF generation in all of vinegar samples. Among the 10 vinegars, the maximum formation rate of HMF was 1.0961 (sample A8), and the minimum was 0.0361 (sample A10). The cause might be related to moisture and sugar content. Higher sugar content, as well as lower moisture content, had effects on promoting HMF formation.Table 2
Summary of kinetic analysis of HMF formation in different heating treatment vinegar and soy sauce samples.
Sample
Regression equationb
K
c
R
2
d
Afe
Bff
SSg
RMSEh
Vinegar
A1
C
(
t
)
=
0.2622
t
+
47.735
0.2622
0.9862
1.0075
1.0000
0.0004
0.4908
A2
C
(
t
)
=
0.0872
t
+
66.252
0.0872
0.9116
1.0095
1.0043
0.0012
0.9763
A3
C
(
t
)
=
0.2123
t
+
38.887
0.2123
0.9243
1.0237
1.0006
0.0063
1.3123
A4
C
(
t
)
=
0.0665
t
+
4.0961
0.0665
0.9352
1.0419
1.0016
0.0091
0.2768
A5
C
(
t
)
=
0.0364
t
+
2.8542
0.0364
0.9108
1.0538
1.0037
0.0256
0.2460
A6
C
(
t
)
=
0.1075
t
+
5.0323
0.1075
0.9019
1.0744
1.0064
0.0390
0.5605
A7
C
(
t
)
=
0.2315
t
+
30.497
0.2315
0.9513
1.0200
1.0008
0.0066
1.1319
A8
C
(
t
)
=
1.0961
t
+
112.03
1.0961
0.9260
1.0387
1.0004
0.0129
6.6946
A9
C
(
t
)
=
0.5909
t
+
58.271
0.5909
0.9123
1.0417
1.0019
0.0143
3.4271
A10
C
(
t
)
=
0.0361
t
+
21.385
0.0361
0.9273
1.0062
1.0000
0.0002
0.1598
Soy sauce
B1
C
(
t
)
=
0.1467
t
+
1.4035
0.1467
0.9267
1.2948
0.9434
0.6056
1.3051
B2
C
(
t
)
=
0
.
4474
t
+
9.4629
0.4474
0.9803
1.1226
1.0500
0.2571
2.7391
B3
C
(
t
)
=
0
.
017
t
+
0.7038
0.0170
0.9257
1.0924
0.9967
0.0403
0.1523
B4
C
(
t
)
=
0
.
0969
t
+
0.7645
0.0969
0.9549
1.1903
0.9407
0.3190
0.6660
B5
C
(
t
)
=
0
.
0693
t
+
1.1512
0.0693
0.9204
1.3119
1.1279
0.8585
0.6447
B6
C
(
t
)
=
0.6618
t
+
16.499
0.6618
0.9481
1.1991
1.0738
0.5966
6.6933
B7
C
(
t
)
=
0
.
3526
t
+
9.2656
0.3526
0.9115
1.3252
1.1543
1.9019
4.7475
B8
C
(
t
)
=
0.0574
t
+
1.351
0.0574
0.9428
1.2553
1.1289
1.3646
0.6107
B9
C
(
t
)
=
0
.
0514
t
+
1.7446
0.0514
0.9162
1.1142
0.9959
0.0983
0.4911
B10
C
(
t
)
=
0.0
15
t
+
3.1703
0.0150
0.9453
1.0241
1.0001
0.0033
0.1143
R
2, Af, Bf, SS, and RMSE: indications of reliability and accuracy of models; aT: the heating temperature (°C); bC(t): the HMF content (mg HMF per kg sample); t: the time of heat treatment (min); ck: rate constant (min−1); dR2: regression coefficient; eAf: the accuracy factor; fBf: the bias factor; gSS: the sum of the squares of the differences of the natural logarithm of observed and predicted values; hRMSE: the root mean square error.


### 3.4. Effect of Sugar on HMF Contents in Vinegars

HMF content after thermal treatment for the longest time and the initial sugar content were shown in Figure2(a). In our study, concentrations of HMF had obviously positive correlation with sugar contents in vinegars. For all of tested vinegars, the highest HMF content was 181.04 mg/kg (sample A8), followed by 79.53 mg/kg (sample A9). The highest sugar content was 1.283% (sample A8), where 0.990% of glucose and 0.293% of fructose were included. And the second highest sugar content was 0.667% (sample A9), where only glucose was included. The effects of different kinds of sugar on HMF formation were investigated in sponge cake models under the heating treatment [23]. The result showed that sucrose, lactose, and maltose yielded less HMF than did glucose and fructose. In Locas’s study, fructose is the most reactive sugar relative to sucrose and glucose, in the formation of HMF under acidic conditions [17]. These findings were good to support our conclusion that HMF was more readily formed at acid system which was rich in sugars, especially fructose.Figure 2
5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) and sugar contents in vinegar (a) and soy sauce (b) samples.
(a)
(b)Figure 3
HMF contents of thermal process models (vinegar samples (a), soy sauce samples (b)) at different heating time.
(a)
(b)


### 3.5. pH Value, Sugar, and Moisture Content in Soy Sauces

The pH, sugar, and moisture content in soy sauce samples were listed in Table1. Soy sauce production involved vigorous lactic and alcohol fermentation. During the fermentation process, lactic acid bacteria produce lactic acid and acetic acid, which leads to pH decrease [1]. As shown in Table 1, the pH value of the 10 soy sauce samples was in the range 4.334–5.122, which was higher than the highest pH value (3.598) in 10 vinegar samples. There was significant difference between different soy sauce samples (p<0.05). Lu et al. [24] analyzed the pH value of 40 samples of Chinese soy sauce; a range of pH value of 3.86–4.98 was detected. This result was also higher than the pH value in tested vinegars. The moisture content in soy sauces varied from 62.267% to 74.543%, which was 26.73% lower than the moisture content of tested vinegars. In Kim and Lee’s study, moisture content in soy sauce showed a decreased trend during fermentation process [25]. That could be one reason that moisture content was so different in different soy sauces. In soy sauce production, soy protein was enzymatically degraded to amino acids, and wheat polysaccharides were enzymatically degraded to monosaccharides [1]. In Table 1 the sugar data obtained in tested soy sauces were listed. The main sugars were glucose, fructose, and sucrose in soy sauces. And maltose was also detected in sample B6. The highest sugar content was 5.597% (sample B3), in which 1.150% of glucose, 0.137% of fructose, and 4.310% of sucrose were included.


### 3.6. Initial HMF Concentrations of Soy Sauces

As a condiment, in order for a soy sauce to have palatable taste, about half of its nitrogenous compounds must be free amino acids; in particular, glutamic acid is a very important component [26]. Studies showed that the rates of HMF formation from glucose and sucrose showed enhancement in the presence of the amino acids, especially acidic amino acids [17]. It was inevitable that HMF was formed in soy sauce, which was abundant in sugar and amino acid. The initial HMF concentrations of the 10 soy sauces ranged from 0.43 to 5.85 mg/kg (Figure 3(a)). No significant differences in the HMF concentrations were observed for sample B5 (0.49 ± 0.06 mg/kg) and sample B8 (0.43 ± 0.01 mg/kg). The highest HMF concentration was obtained for sample B2 (5.85 ± 0.11 mg/kg), while the lowest was for sample B8 (0.43 ± 0.01 mg/kg). Compared with vinegars, scarce information was available in soy sauce about the content of HMF. Wang et al. [27] reported a range of HMF concentrations of 0–47.56 mg/kg for 6 kinds of Chinese soy sauce. Goscinny et al. measured the content of HMF in Bouillon sauce, and nonquantifiable traces were observed [28]. In the production processing of soy sauce, it usually contains added caramel, in some cases molasses, to give it a distinctive appearance [7]. Most of the existing literatures focused on the content of HMF in caramel [29, 30].


### 3.7. HMF Concentrations in Heating Treatment Soy Sauces

The HMF concentrations in heating treatment soy sauces were shown in Figure3(b), while kinetic analyses of HMF were shown in Table 2. As shown in Figure 3(b), it clearly indicated that HMF concentrations in most of soy sauces keep a continued increase trend with extension of the heating treatment time. However, HMF concentrates in samples B1, B3, B4, B5, B9, and B10 were showing a trend of increasing first and then decreasing. The highest content of HMF in samples B1, B4, B9, and B10 were 14.53, 8.99, 6.11, and 4.27 mg/kg (80 min), and the HMF content was reduced by 20.10%, 18.69%, 0.82%, and 41.55% when continuously heated for 40 min, respectively. In addition, the time (100 min) of the highest content of HMF formed was similar in samples B3 and B5. The HMF contents of them were reduced by 12.67% and 9.56% when continuously heated for 20 min, respectively. The same conclusion with vinegar sample was drawn that longer heating treatment time would reduce the HMF content. With Table 2 analysis, the data was expressed in zero-order kinetics model at 100°C before the maximum HMF generation in all of soy sauce samples. Among the 10 soy sauces, the maximum formation rate of HMF was 0.6618 (sample B6), and the minimum was 0.0150 (sample B10). The cause might be related to moisture and sugar content. In addition, previous study showed that the addition of alanine as a catalyst to maltose solution gave rise to an increase in concentrations of HMF [31].


### 3.8. Effect of Sugar on HMF Contents in Soy Sauces

HMF content after thermal treatment for the longest time and the initial sugar content were shown in Figure2(b). For tested soy sauces, the highest HMF content was 87.29 mg/kg (sample B6), followed by 61.51 mg/kg (sample B2). The highest sugar content was 5.597% (sample B3), where 1.150% of glucose, 0.137% of fructose, and 4.310% of sucrose were included. And the second highest sugar content was 2.081% (sample B5), where 1.180% of glucose, 0.628% of fructose, and 0.273% of sucrose were included. However, no association was found between the concentration of HMF and the sugar content. The cause might be that the transforming capacity of sugars was different under the conditions of different pH, amino acid, moisture content, and so on.


## 3.1. pH Value, Sugar, and Moisture Content in Vinegars

The pH, sugar, and moisture content in the vinegar samples were listed in Table1. Vinegar was obtained by a double fermentation process (alcoholic and acetic fermentation) of sugary and starchy substrates [2]. The key ingredient is acetic acid, which gives it an acidic taste, although there may be additions of other kinds of acid like tartaric and citric [12, 13]. Compared with other condiments, vinegar had a lower pH value. As shown in Table 1, the pH value of the 10 vinegars was in the range 2.743–3.598. Although the result of the test was similar to what was reported by Lalou et al. (2.83–3.53) [14], there was significant difference between different tested vinegar samples (p<0.05). There were great variations on moisture content in vinegar samples, too. The highest amount of moisture was 98.292% (sample A10), while the lowest was 89.010% (sample A8). Previous research had shown that not only pH value and moisture content but also varieties and contents of sugar have effects on HMF formation [15–17]. And numerous studies have indicated that fructose is the most reactive sugar relative to sucrose and glucose, in the formation of HMF under acidic conditions [18]. Therefore, sugar content was also considered in this study. In Table 1, the sugar data obtained were listed. The main sugars were glucose and fructose in vinegars. As for sucrose, maltose, and lactose, concentrations were very low in vinegars.Table 1
pH value, sugar, and moisture contents in vinegars and soy sauces.
Sample
Glucose
Fructose
Sucrose
Maltose
Lactose
pH (n=3)
Moisture (%) (n=3)
(%)
Vinegar
—
—
—
A1
—
—
—
—
—
3.317
±
0.003
(
f
)
95.02
8
±
0.000
(
d
)
A2
0.317
—
—
—
—
3.411
±
0.001
(
d
)
94.172
±
0.001
(
g
)
A3
0.547
—
—
—
—
3.385
±
0.001
(
e
)
94.217
±
0.000
(
f
g
)
A4
0.198
—
—
—
—
3.283
±
0.002
(
g
)
95.471
±
0.000
(
c
)
A5
—
—
—
—
—
3.248
±
0.007
(
h
)
97.076
±
0.000
(
b
)
A6
0.126
—
—
—
—
3.598
±
0.002
(
a
)
94.753
±
0.001
(
e
)
A7
0.262
—
—
—
—
3.503
±
0.005
(
b
)
90.745
±
0.001
(
h
)
A8
0.990
0.293
—
—
—
3.478
±
0.001
(
c
)
89.010
±
0.001
(
i
)
A9
0.677
—
—
—
—
3.052
±
0.001
(
i
)
94.309
±
0.000
(
f
)
A10
0.218
0.240
—
—
—
2.743
±
0.004
(
j
)
98.292
±
0.000
(
a
)
Soy sauce
B1
0.933
—
—
—
—
4.620
±
0.006
(
g
)
70.346
±
0.004
(
d
)
B2
0.444
—
—
—
—
4.334
±
0.005
(
j
)
74.543
±
0.001
(
a
)
B3
1.150
0.137
4.310
—
—
4.895
±
0.003
(
d
)
63.518
±
0.001
(
h
)
B4
0.372
—
—
—
—
5.090
±
0.003
(
b
)
68.047
±
0.001
(
e
)
B5
1.180
0.628
0.273
—
—
4.747
±
0.005
(
e
)
71.258
±
0.001
(
c
)
B6
1.180
0.368
—
0.122
—
5.018
±
0.002
(
i
)
67.351
±
0.000
(
b
)
B7
1.380
0.367
—
—
—
4.456
±
0.002
(
h
)
62.267
±
0.001
(
i
)
B8
0.474
—
1.060
—
—
4.669
±
0.001
(
f
)
73.611
±
0.000
(
b
)
B9
0.662
—
—
—
—
5.122
±
0.002
(
a
)
66.595
±
0.000
(
g
)
B10
0.636
—
1.770
—
—
4.362
±
0.001
(
c
)
73.446
±
0.000
(
f
)
Different letters indicate that there was significant difference between different kinds of vinegar or soy sauce in “pH value” or “moisture contents.”


## 3.2. Initial HMF Concentrations of Vinegars

Vinegar has high antioxidant activity, antimicrobial properties, antidiabetic effects, and therapeutic properties [19], which made it widely used as acidic seasoning. As all food matrixes used for the production of vinegar contain sugar, formation of HMF during either the production process or storage is possible.The initial HMF concentrations of the 10 vinegars ranged from 0.42 to 115.43 mg/kg (Figure3(a)). The concentrations of HMF in vinegar samples have been reported by many scholars, and values ranging from 0 mg/kg up to an extremely high value of 14,145 mg/kg have been reported, which was an indicator of different practices exercised by different manufacturers and the lack of consistent process optimization. The range of HMF concentrations for vinegar samples obtained in our study was much lower than that reported by Lalou et al. (211–14,145 mg/kg) [14]. Caligiani et al. [20] reported a range of HMF concentrations of 0–3.38 mg/kg for 105 vinegar samples, and they concluded that their method based on proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy was satisfactory for the quantification of HMF concentration. Bignardi et al. [21] reported a range of HMF concentrations of 0.82–1,153.55 mg/kg for 3 vinegar samples, which was also greater than that obtained in the present study. In addition, the HMF concentrations reported by Masino et al. [22] for 10 vinegars were found to be significantly greater than the values determined by others. Theobald et al. [9] analyzed the HMF content in various kinds of vinegar. They found that balsamic vinegars exhibited very high HMF concentrations of about 300 mg/L, and, depending on their age, the concentrations of HMF ranged upwards to 5.5 g/kg.


## 3.3. HMF Concentrations in Heating Treatment Vinegars

The HMF concentrations in heating treatment vinegars were shown in Figure3(a), while kinetic analyses of HMF were shown in Table 2. As shown in Figure 3(a), it clearly indicated that HMF concentrations in most of vinegars gradually increased with extension of the heating treatment time. However, HMF concentrates in samples A1, A2, A6, and A9 were showing a trend of increasing first and then decreasing. The highest content of HMF in samples A1 and A6 were 58.28 mg/kg and 9.08 mg/kg (40 min), and the HMF content was reduced by 2.93% and 20.70% when continuously heated for 20 min, respectively. In addition, the time (50 min) of the highest content of HMF formed was similar in samples A2 and A9. The HMF contents of them were reduced by 2.10% and 5.96% when continuously heated for 10 min, respectively. Conclusion was drawn that longer heating treatment time would reduce the HMF content, which might be due to the occurrence of the side reactions of HMF. With Table 2 analysis, the data was expressed in zero-order kinetics model at 100°C before the maximum HMF generation in all of vinegar samples. Among the 10 vinegars, the maximum formation rate of HMF was 1.0961 (sample A8), and the minimum was 0.0361 (sample A10). The cause might be related to moisture and sugar content. Higher sugar content, as well as lower moisture content, had effects on promoting HMF formation.Table 2
Summary of kinetic analysis of HMF formation in different heating treatment vinegar and soy sauce samples.
Sample
Regression equationb
K
c
R
2
d
Afe
Bff
SSg
RMSEh
Vinegar
A1
C
(
t
)
=
0.2622
t
+
47.735
0.2622
0.9862
1.0075
1.0000
0.0004
0.4908
A2
C
(
t
)
=
0.0872
t
+
66.252
0.0872
0.9116
1.0095
1.0043
0.0012
0.9763
A3
C
(
t
)
=
0.2123
t
+
38.887
0.2123
0.9243
1.0237
1.0006
0.0063
1.3123
A4
C
(
t
)
=
0.0665
t
+
4.0961
0.0665
0.9352
1.0419
1.0016
0.0091
0.2768
A5
C
(
t
)
=
0.0364
t
+
2.8542
0.0364
0.9108
1.0538
1.0037
0.0256
0.2460
A6
C
(
t
)
=
0.1075
t
+
5.0323
0.1075
0.9019
1.0744
1.0064
0.0390
0.5605
A7
C
(
t
)
=
0.2315
t
+
30.497
0.2315
0.9513
1.0200
1.0008
0.0066
1.1319
A8
C
(
t
)
=
1.0961
t
+
112.03
1.0961
0.9260
1.0387
1.0004
0.0129
6.6946
A9
C
(
t
)
=
0.5909
t
+
58.271
0.5909
0.9123
1.0417
1.0019
0.0143
3.4271
A10
C
(
t
)
=
0.0361
t
+
21.385
0.0361
0.9273
1.0062
1.0000
0.0002
0.1598
Soy sauce
B1
C
(
t
)
=
0.1467
t
+
1.4035
0.1467
0.9267
1.2948
0.9434
0.6056
1.3051
B2
C
(
t
)
=
0
.
4474
t
+
9.4629
0.4474
0.9803
1.1226
1.0500
0.2571
2.7391
B3
C
(
t
)
=
0
.
017
t
+
0.7038
0.0170
0.9257
1.0924
0.9967
0.0403
0.1523
B4
C
(
t
)
=
0
.
0969
t
+
0.7645
0.0969
0.9549
1.1903
0.9407
0.3190
0.6660
B5
C
(
t
)
=
0
.
0693
t
+
1.1512
0.0693
0.9204
1.3119
1.1279
0.8585
0.6447
B6
C
(
t
)
=
0.6618
t
+
16.499
0.6618
0.9481
1.1991
1.0738
0.5966
6.6933
B7
C
(
t
)
=
0
.
3526
t
+
9.2656
0.3526
0.9115
1.3252
1.1543
1.9019
4.7475
B8
C
(
t
)
=
0.0574
t
+
1.351
0.0574
0.9428
1.2553
1.1289
1.3646
0.6107
B9
C
(
t
)
=
0
.
0514
t
+
1.7446
0.0514
0.9162
1.1142
0.9959
0.0983
0.4911
B10
C
(
t
)
=
0.0
15
t
+
3.1703
0.0150
0.9453
1.0241
1.0001
0.0033
0.1143
R
2, Af, Bf, SS, and RMSE: indications of reliability and accuracy of models; aT: the heating temperature (°C); bC(t): the HMF content (mg HMF per kg sample); t: the time of heat treatment (min); ck: rate constant (min−1); dR2: regression coefficient; eAf: the accuracy factor; fBf: the bias factor; gSS: the sum of the squares of the differences of the natural logarithm of observed and predicted values; hRMSE: the root mean square error.


## 3.4. Effect of Sugar on HMF Contents in Vinegars

HMF content after thermal treatment for the longest time and the initial sugar content were shown in Figure2(a). In our study, concentrations of HMF had obviously positive correlation with sugar contents in vinegars. For all of tested vinegars, the highest HMF content was 181.04 mg/kg (sample A8), followed by 79.53 mg/kg (sample A9). The highest sugar content was 1.283% (sample A8), where 0.990% of glucose and 0.293% of fructose were included. And the second highest sugar content was 0.667% (sample A9), where only glucose was included. The effects of different kinds of sugar on HMF formation were investigated in sponge cake models under the heating treatment [23]. The result showed that sucrose, lactose, and maltose yielded less HMF than did glucose and fructose. In Locas’s study, fructose is the most reactive sugar relative to sucrose and glucose, in the formation of HMF under acidic conditions [17]. These findings were good to support our conclusion that HMF was more readily formed at acid system which was rich in sugars, especially fructose.Figure 2
5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) and sugar contents in vinegar (a) and soy sauce (b) samples.
(a)
(b)Figure 3
HMF contents of thermal process models (vinegar samples (a), soy sauce samples (b)) at different heating time.
(a)
(b)


## 3.5. pH Value, Sugar, and Moisture Content in Soy Sauces

The pH, sugar, and moisture content in soy sauce samples were listed in Table1. Soy sauce production involved vigorous lactic and alcohol fermentation. During the fermentation process, lactic acid bacteria produce lactic acid and acetic acid, which leads to pH decrease [1]. As shown in Table 1, the pH value of the 10 soy sauce samples was in the range 4.334–5.122, which was higher than the highest pH value (3.598) in 10 vinegar samples. There was significant difference between different soy sauce samples (p<0.05). Lu et al. [24] analyzed the pH value of 40 samples of Chinese soy sauce; a range of pH value of 3.86–4.98 was detected. This result was also higher than the pH value in tested vinegars. The moisture content in soy sauces varied from 62.267% to 74.543%, which was 26.73% lower than the moisture content of tested vinegars. In Kim and Lee’s study, moisture content in soy sauce showed a decreased trend during fermentation process [25]. That could be one reason that moisture content was so different in different soy sauces. In soy sauce production, soy protein was enzymatically degraded to amino acids, and wheat polysaccharides were enzymatically degraded to monosaccharides [1]. In Table 1 the sugar data obtained in tested soy sauces were listed. The main sugars were glucose, fructose, and sucrose in soy sauces. And maltose was also detected in sample B6. The highest sugar content was 5.597% (sample B3), in which 1.150% of glucose, 0.137% of fructose, and 4.310% of sucrose were included.


## 3.6. Initial HMF Concentrations of Soy Sauces

As a condiment, in order for a soy sauce to have palatable taste, about half of its nitrogenous compounds must be free amino acids; in particular, glutamic acid is a very important component [26]. Studies showed that the rates of HMF formation from glucose and sucrose showed enhancement in the presence of the amino acids, especially acidic amino acids [17]. It was inevitable that HMF was formed in soy sauce, which was abundant in sugar and amino acid. The initial HMF concentrations of the 10 soy sauces ranged from 0.43 to 5.85 mg/kg (Figure 3(a)). No significant differences in the HMF concentrations were observed for sample B5 (0.49 ± 0.06 mg/kg) and sample B8 (0.43 ± 0.01 mg/kg). The highest HMF concentration was obtained for sample B2 (5.85 ± 0.11 mg/kg), while the lowest was for sample B8 (0.43 ± 0.01 mg/kg). Compared with vinegars, scarce information was available in soy sauce about the content of HMF. Wang et al. [27] reported a range of HMF concentrations of 0–47.56 mg/kg for 6 kinds of Chinese soy sauce. Goscinny et al. measured the content of HMF in Bouillon sauce, and nonquantifiable traces were observed [28]. In the production processing of soy sauce, it usually contains added caramel, in some cases molasses, to give it a distinctive appearance [7]. Most of the existing literatures focused on the content of HMF in caramel [29, 30].


## 3.7. HMF Concentrations in Heating Treatment Soy Sauces

The HMF concentrations in heating treatment soy sauces were shown in Figure3(b), while kinetic analyses of HMF were shown in Table 2. As shown in Figure 3(b), it clearly indicated that HMF concentrations in most of soy sauces keep a continued increase trend with extension of the heating treatment time. However, HMF concentrates in samples B1, B3, B4, B5, B9, and B10 were showing a trend of increasing first and then decreasing. The highest content of HMF in samples B1, B4, B9, and B10 were 14.53, 8.99, 6.11, and 4.27 mg/kg (80 min), and the HMF content was reduced by 20.10%, 18.69%, 0.82%, and 41.55% when continuously heated for 40 min, respectively. In addition, the time (100 min) of the highest content of HMF formed was similar in samples B3 and B5. The HMF contents of them were reduced by 12.67% and 9.56% when continuously heated for 20 min, respectively. The same conclusion with vinegar sample was drawn that longer heating treatment time would reduce the HMF content. With Table 2 analysis, the data was expressed in zero-order kinetics model at 100°C before the maximum HMF generation in all of soy sauce samples. Among the 10 soy sauces, the maximum formation rate of HMF was 0.6618 (sample B6), and the minimum was 0.0150 (sample B10). The cause might be related to moisture and sugar content. In addition, previous study showed that the addition of alanine as a catalyst to maltose solution gave rise to an increase in concentrations of HMF [31].


## 3.8. Effect of Sugar on HMF Contents in Soy Sauces

HMF content after thermal treatment for the longest time and the initial sugar content were shown in Figure2(b). For tested soy sauces, the highest HMF content was 87.29 mg/kg (sample B6), followed by 61.51 mg/kg (sample B2). The highest sugar content was 5.597% (sample B3), where 1.150% of glucose, 0.137% of fructose, and 4.310% of sucrose were included. And the second highest sugar content was 2.081% (sample B5), where 1.180% of glucose, 0.628% of fructose, and 0.273% of sucrose were included. However, no association was found between the concentration of HMF and the sugar content. The cause might be that the transforming capacity of sugars was different under the conditions of different pH, amino acid, moisture content, and so on.


## 4. Conclusions

The HMF concentrations of 10 vinegars and 10 soy sauces were evaluated by HPLC. Significant differences (p<0.05) were observed in the HMF concentrations of both vinegar and soy sauce samples, which exhibited a wide variability in a range of 0.42 to 115.43 mg/kg for vinegar samples and 0.43 to 5.85 mg/kg for soy sauce samples. Except for samples A4, A5, and A6, the HMF concentrations in the vinegar samples were all greater than those in soy sauce samples. The results showed that the HMF concentrations in soy sauce samples were below the maximum amount allowed in Chinese national standards (40 mg/kg). However, in the tested vinegar samples, only 4 samples were below this level. In our study, concentrations of HMF had obviously positive correlation with sugar contents in vinegar samples. Longer heating treatment time would reduce the HMF content in all of tested samples. The concentrates of HMF were expressed in zero-order kinetics model at 100°C before the maximum HMF generation in both vinegar and soy sauce samples.



---

*Source: 8314354-2017-08-16.xml*