# Photosensitization of Carbon Nitride Photoelectrodes with CdS: A Novel Architecture with Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Activity

Authors: Xiaosong Zhou; Fei Yang; Bei Jin; Tang Xu; Yaqing Yang; Xiaohui Yao
Journal: International Journal of Photoenergy
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

CdS with well-defined crystallinity is anchored on carbon nitride photoelectrodes by a successive chemical bath deposition. And the as-synthesized samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, ultraviolet-visible diffuse reflection spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and photoluminescence spectroscopy techniques. The effect of the amount of CdS on the catalytic activity for the degradation of acid Orange II is investigated under visible light irradiation. Results show that the photoelectrodes composed of CdS/CN exhibit much higher catalytic activity than pure CN photoelectrodes. A possible photocatalytic mechanism of the CdS/CN electrodes is proposed under visible light irradiation.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The photocatalysis technique has a promising application prospect in pollutant decomposition and hydrogen production via the generation of •OH radicals and other oxidative species [1–3]. Although the semiconductor TiO2 is considered as one of the best photocatalysts, its light response range and the photo-efficiency are still limited because of wide band gap (3.2 eV) [4, 5]. Therefore, to create simple, efficient, and sustainable visible-light photocatalysts is the major challenge in this research field [6]. Recently, polymeric graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) was introduced as metal-free photocatalysts for organic photosynthesis; solar energy conversion and sustainable hydrogen production [7] seems to offer new opportunities for solar energy application as covalent carbon nitrides are polymeric, cheap, abundant, and stable materials with easily controllable surface and bulk properties. But the high recombination ratio of photoinduced electron-hole pairs and the very poor response to visible light will hinder the application of g-C3N4 in photocatalysis [8]. Therefore, it is a useful way to expand the light absorption further into the visible range and improve photocatalytic activity by doping with metal or nonmetal species [9–14], synthesizing mesoporous structures [15] or nanorods [16] or coupling with other semiconductors [17–19] and sensitizing by organic dyes [20].Semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) have been attached to photocatalysts to improve their photoactivity in the visible spectrum. Comparing with other ways, coupling with semiconductors QDs has two unique advantages. On one hand, the band gap of the QDs can be modified by varying the size of the QDs allowing one to tune the visible response of the QDs. On the other hand, QDs can be used to utilize hot electrons or to generate multiple charge carriers with a single high-energy photon [21]. Since Gerischer and Lübke reported that utilizing short band gap semiconductors, such as CdS, as a sensitizer for single crystal TiO2 to improve its photocatalytic activity in visible light region [22], many researchers have explored different approaches to modify large band gap semiconductors (TiO2, ZnO, and SnO2) with a variety of chalogenides [23–26] and probe the excited state charge transfer processes [27, 28]. Very recently, CdS sensitized C3N4 to enhance in both photoactivity and stability [29–31].In this paper, a high efficient CdS/CN photoelectrode by the successive chemical bath deposition (CBD) method is reported. The as-prepared CdS/CN photoelectrodes exhibit higher incident photocatalytic activity than those of the pure carbon nitride photoelectrodes under visible light irradiation.


## 2. Experimental Section

### 2.1. Preparation of Samples

Carbon nitride polymer was prepared by electrodeposition [32, 33]. In a typical synthesis, a clear Fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass was used as positive electrode and iron silk was used as negative electrode. The interelectrode separation in all the cases was 2 mm. 150 mL of methanol (≧99.5%) and acetonitrile (V
methanol : V
acetonitrile = 1 : 1) mixture was used as solvent and 0.2 M melamine as electrolyte. The typical sample was deposited under an applied potential of 120 V and kept 1 h at the room temperature, which was denoted as CN.CdS was deposited on the carbon nitride electrodes by the successive CBD method. More specifically, the carbon nitride electrodes were immersed in 0.2 M CdSO4 solution for 1 min, rinsed with deionized water, and then immersed in 0.2 M Na2S solution for 1 min and rinsed again with deionized water. This process was repeated for many cycles and resulted in the formation of CdS crystallites on the carbon nitride electrodes surface. The degree of surface coverage depends on the number of cycles the deposition repeated, which was denoted as CdS/CN-T (T denotes number of cycles).


### 2.2. Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on an X-ray diffractometer (D/max-IIIA, Japan) by Cu Ka radiation at 30 kV and 30 mA in the angle range of 10–80°. The surface morphology was examined by a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (LEO1530VP, LEO Company) at an acceleration voltage of 15 kV and a transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL, JEM2010) at 200 kV. The UV-vis light absorption spectra were obtained from a Hitachi UV-3010 spectrophotometer equipped with an integrating sphere assembly, using the diffuse reflection method and BaSO4 as a reference to measure all the samples. The chemical nature of C, N, Cd, and S has been studied by using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) in Krato Axis Ultra DLD spectrometer with Al Ka X-ray (h
v
=
1486.6eV) at 15 kV and 150 W. The binding energy was a reference to C1s line at 284.6 eV for calibration.


### 2.3. Photoelectrochemical Performances

Photocurrent measurements were carried out in a standard electrodes photoelectrochemical cell by an electrochemical workstation (uECS). The as-prepared samples, platinum-gauze, and Ag/AgCl were used as working, counter and reference electrode, respectively. A sodium sulfide solution (1 M) was used as electrolyte. The light for the photocurrent was the filtered light (λ
>
400nm, 150 mW·cm−2) from a PLS-SXE300UV Xe lamp. The light/dark short circuit photocurrent response under zero bias was recorded by an Agilent digital multimeter.


### 2.4. Photocatalytic Activity Tests

The photocatalytic activity was measured in a XPAII reactor. The samples (8
×
20 mm) were immersed in 10 mL quartz test tubes containing 4 mL acid Orange II (OII) (10 mg/L) in the dark for 1 h to achieve adsorption equilibrium before irradiation. After that, the visible light (λ
>
400nm) photocatalytic experiment was conducted for 2 h. The remaining dye concentrations in the reaction solution were determined using the U3010 spectrophotometer. The whole decomposing process was conducted with sparging air of 10 mL/min. The degradation ratio of OII can be calculated by X
%
=
(
A
0
-
A
)
/
A
0
×
100
%.


## 2.1. Preparation of Samples

Carbon nitride polymer was prepared by electrodeposition [32, 33]. In a typical synthesis, a clear Fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass was used as positive electrode and iron silk was used as negative electrode. The interelectrode separation in all the cases was 2 mm. 150 mL of methanol (≧99.5%) and acetonitrile (V
methanol : V
acetonitrile = 1 : 1) mixture was used as solvent and 0.2 M melamine as electrolyte. The typical sample was deposited under an applied potential of 120 V and kept 1 h at the room temperature, which was denoted as CN.CdS was deposited on the carbon nitride electrodes by the successive CBD method. More specifically, the carbon nitride electrodes were immersed in 0.2 M CdSO4 solution for 1 min, rinsed with deionized water, and then immersed in 0.2 M Na2S solution for 1 min and rinsed again with deionized water. This process was repeated for many cycles and resulted in the formation of CdS crystallites on the carbon nitride electrodes surface. The degree of surface coverage depends on the number of cycles the deposition repeated, which was denoted as CdS/CN-T (T denotes number of cycles).


## 2.2. Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on an X-ray diffractometer (D/max-IIIA, Japan) by Cu Ka radiation at 30 kV and 30 mA in the angle range of 10–80°. The surface morphology was examined by a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (LEO1530VP, LEO Company) at an acceleration voltage of 15 kV and a transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL, JEM2010) at 200 kV. The UV-vis light absorption spectra were obtained from a Hitachi UV-3010 spectrophotometer equipped with an integrating sphere assembly, using the diffuse reflection method and BaSO4 as a reference to measure all the samples. The chemical nature of C, N, Cd, and S has been studied by using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) in Krato Axis Ultra DLD spectrometer with Al Ka X-ray (h
v
=
1486.6eV) at 15 kV and 150 W. The binding energy was a reference to C1s line at 284.6 eV for calibration.


## 2.3. Photoelectrochemical Performances

Photocurrent measurements were carried out in a standard electrodes photoelectrochemical cell by an electrochemical workstation (uECS). The as-prepared samples, platinum-gauze, and Ag/AgCl were used as working, counter and reference electrode, respectively. A sodium sulfide solution (1 M) was used as electrolyte. The light for the photocurrent was the filtered light (λ
>
400nm, 150 mW·cm−2) from a PLS-SXE300UV Xe lamp. The light/dark short circuit photocurrent response under zero bias was recorded by an Agilent digital multimeter.


## 2.4. Photocatalytic Activity Tests

The photocatalytic activity was measured in a XPAII reactor. The samples (8
×
20 mm) were immersed in 10 mL quartz test tubes containing 4 mL acid Orange II (OII) (10 mg/L) in the dark for 1 h to achieve adsorption equilibrium before irradiation. After that, the visible light (λ
>
400nm) photocatalytic experiment was conducted for 2 h. The remaining dye concentrations in the reaction solution were determined using the U3010 spectrophotometer. The whole decomposing process was conducted with sparging air of 10 mL/min. The degradation ratio of OII can be calculated by X
%
=
(
A
0
-
A
)
/
A
0
×
100
%.


## 3. Results and Discussion

The SEM of CdS/CN electrodes are shown in Figure1(a). The electrode position method obtained carbon nitride which is irregular spheres with diameters in 70–110 nm. These results are further revealed by TEM. Figure 1(b) clearly shows that the sample has small particle on the surface of carbon nitride with the size of 6 to 10 nm. Figure 1(c) is a corresponding high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image of the small particle on the surface of carbon nitride. It is found that 0.335 nm fringe of the CdS corresponds to the (220) plane of the cubic phase of CdS (JPCDS 80-0019) [8]. Figure 1(d) presents the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of the corresponding CdS, and the SAED pattern reveals a cubic phase CdS which is in line with the results obtained from the HRTEM measurement. These results confirmed that the small particle on the surface of carbon nitride is CdS.(a) SEM image of CdS/CN-10; (b) TEM image of CdS/CN-10; (c) HRTEM image of CdS/CN-10; (d) SAED pattern of CdS.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The typical XRD patterns of carbon nitride and CdS/CN electrodes are shown in Figure2. The most intense XRD peak at 27.4°, corresponding to an interlayer distance of 0.326 nm, can be indexed as the (002) peak of the stacking of the conjugated aromatic system. The XRD measurements fully indicate that the as-prepared sample is carbon nitride (Figure 2(a)). The peaks located at 28.3° are corresponding to cubic phase of CdS (JPCDS 80-0019) [8]. It also indicates that the coexistence of cubic CdS in the composites as additional peaks is observed in the XRD curves of CdS/CN electrodes (Figure 2(b)), which can be assigned to the peaks of cubic CdS. The average particle size calculated by the Scherrer formula from (220) crystal plane of cubic CdS is about 7.8 nm. These results are good consistent with SEM and HRTEM investigation.Figure 2
XRD patterns of the as-prepared samples: (a) carbon nitride; (b) CdS/CN.Figure3 shows the high-resolution C1s, N1s, S2p, and Cd3d XPS spectra of CdS/CN-10 electrode, respectively. The C1s and N1s spectra are deconvoluted into various lines, and each of them is associated with a different binding energy (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)), with a C/N molar ratio of 0.9 [32, 33]. The C1s XPS spectrum in Figure 3(a) can be separated to three peaks at 284.6 eV, 286.3 eV, and 288.4 eV, respectively. The peak of C1s at 284.6 eV is assigned to the C–C bond in the turbostratic carbon nitride structure [34], and the peak at 286.3 eV is attributed to the sp2 C atoms bonded to N inside the aromatic structure (Figure 3(a)). The peak at 288.4 eV is assigned to the sp3 C–N bond of the sp3 bonded composition [34, 35]. The N1s peak is comprised of two components centered at 398.7 eV and 400.1 eV (Figure 3(b)), which are identified as the C–N–C groups and the nitrogen surrounded by an amorphous N–(C)3 network, respectively [34, 36]. The result shows that the turbostratic carbon nitride structure is similar to the structure of mesoporous carbon nitride reported by Vinu’s group [37] and the one in bulk by Gao’s group [35]. The Cd3d5/2 and Cd3d3/2 peaks centered at 405.2 and 411.9 eV with a spin-orbit separation of 6.7 eV (Figure 3(c)) can be assigned to Cd2+ of CdS. The S2p peak is observed at 161.8 eV (Figure 3(d)), corresponding to S2− of CdS. The Cd/S molar ratio is about 1.03. The content of CdS is approximately 2.53 (wt.%) in CdS/CN-10 electrode. These results further confirm that the obtained samples are composed of CdS and carbon nitride [38].XPS spectra of the as-obtained sample CdS/CN-10: (a) C1s; (b) N1s; (c) S2p; (d) Cd3d.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)In order to study the optical response of CdS/CN composites heterojunction, their UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) were measured. Figure4 showed the DRS of pure carbon nitride and CdS/CN electrodes. The adsorption edge of pure carbon nitride was about 440 nm. While the CdS/CN-5, CdS/CN-10, and CdS/CN-30 electrodes show high tailing absorbance in the visible light range, the adsorption feature indicates that CdS/CN electrodes should be possibly responsive to the visible light.Figure 4
UV-vis DRS of the as-prepared samples: (a) carbon nitride; (b) CdS/CN-5; (c) CdS/CN-10; (d) CdS/CN-30.Figure5 illustrated the concentration decrease of OII with reaction time photocatalyzed by different samples under visible light. The photodegradation efficiency of carbon nitride was 15% after 2.5 h illumination. While the CdS/CN composites showed higher photocatalytic efficiency than pure carbon nitride, and the photodegradation efficiency increases and decreases with the increase of CdS amount in the composites, after 2.5 h irradiation, the photodegradation efficiency of CdS/CN-10 can nearly reach 100%, which was the highest in all samples.Figure 5
Comparison of the photocatalytic activity of the as-prepared samples for the degradation of OII under visible light irradiation: (a) carbon nitride; (b) CdS/CN-5; (c) CdS/CN-10; (d) CdS/CN-30.As reusability of photocatalyst is a key issue for practical application, Figure6 shows the reusability of CdS/CN-10 electrode for degradation of OII under visible light irradiation. As no obvious decrease of degradation is observed after five runs, the CdS/CN electrodes can be concluded to be stable during the photocatalytic reaction. XPS analysis of the material before and after the experiment (Figure 7) also illustrates that there is no photocorrosion for CdS during the running period. These results suggest that the CdS/CN electrodes have excellent reusability stable and can be used as a recyclable photocatalyst.Figure 6
Cycling runs for the photocatalytic degradation of OII in the presence of CdS/CN-10 electrode under visible light irradiation.S2p and Cd3d XPS spectra of CdS/CN-10 electrode before and after used in cycling photocatalytic experiments.
(a)
(b)The photocurrent responses of carbon nitride and CdS/CN electrodes under a 0 V versus Ag/AgCl bias are shown in Figure8. The CdS/CN electrodes exhibit superior performance with greater photocurrent generation efficiency to that of carbon nitride electrode. The photocurrent at first increased and then decreased with increasing deposition cycles. A maximum photocurrent density is obtained from CdS/CN-10 electrode (1.74 mA·cm−2), which is 6.7-fold higher than that of the pure carbon nitride electrode (0.26 mA·cm−2). The increase in photocurrent seen during early CdS deposition cycles is due to increased absorption of light. And then the maximum deposition cycle beyond will decrease the photocurrent of the electrode, which is attributed to completion of CdS growth, cohesion of the aggregates, and saturation in the absorption of photons, resulting in less efficiency in transferring electrons.Figure 8
Photocurrent response of the as-prepared samples under visible light illumination: (a) carbon nitride; (b) CdS/CN-5; (c) CdS/CN-10; (d) CdS/CN-30.Notably, the photocatalytic activities of CdS/CN electrodes are significantly enhanced in the presence of CdS distributed over pure carbon nitride electrode, which can be explained from the PL analysis. The PL spectra are widely used to investigate the migration, transfer, and recombination processes of the photogenerated electron-hole pairs in a semiconductor, since PL emission arises from the recombination of free carriers. Figure9 shows the PL spectra of pure carbon nitride and CdS/CN electrodes excited by 325 nm. From Figure 9, it is clear to see that there is a significant decrease in the PL intensity of CdS/CN electrodes compared to that of pure carbon nitride. A weaker intensity of the peak represents a lower recombination probability of photogenerated charge carriers. Therefore, the CdS dispersed on the surface of carbon nitride could effectively inhibit the recombination of photogenerated charge carriers, which helps the separation of photogenerated electron-hole pairs in carbon nitride. The significant PL quenching is observed in the CdS/CN electrodes as the content of CdS increases. The quenching is due to the photogenerated charge transfer between the CdS and carbon nitride. It can be established that the CdS/CN electrodes are very promising for the photocatalysis with satisfying efficiency.Figure 9
Comparison of photoluminescence spectra of the as-prepared samples at an excitation wavelength of 325 nm: (a) carbon nitride, (b) CdS/CN-5, (c) CdS/CN-10, (d) CdS/CN-30.On the basis of the principle of photocurrent responses, PL data of carbon nitride, and CdS/CN electrodes, we depicted the basic structure of the CdS modified with carbon nitride and the main charge-transfer processes between CdS and carbon nitride after it is activated under visible light irradiation (Figure10). The overall photoconversion efficiency of a multiband gap semiconductor depends on the position of its conduction and valence bands as well as its geometrical arrangement. For efficient interparticle electron transfer between the semiconductors CdS and carbon nitride, the conduction band of CdS must be more anodic than the corresponding band of carbon nitride. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations suggest that the CB and VB edge potentials of g-C3N4 are at −1.12 and 1.57 eV, respectively [7]. However, the CB and VB edge potentials of CdS are at −0.55 and 1.88 eV, respectively [39]. These thermodynamic conditions also favor the phenomenon of electron injections, and thus CdS and carbon nitride match very well (Figure 10). Under visible light irradiation, both semiconductors (CdS and carbon nitride) are excited. Since the CB edge potential of carbon nitride is more negative than that of CdS the photoinduced electrons on carbon nitride particle surfaces transfer easily to CdS via the well-developed interface. Similarly, the photoinduced holes on the CdS surface move to carbon nitride due to the large difference in VB edge potentials. This reduces the probability of electron-hole recombination and leads to a larger amount of electrons on the CdS surface and holes on the carbon nitride surface, respectively, resulting in superior photocatalytic performance of CdS/CN electrodes under visible light irradiation.Figure 10
Scheme for electron-hole separation and transport at the visible light driven organic-inorganic composites photocatalyst interface and in between CdS and C3N4.


## 4. Conclusion

We report the synthesis of photocatalyst CdS/CN electrodes by a simple electrodeposition and successive CBD method. This novel architecture leads to better solar light harvesting in the visible light region. The visible light components (λ
>
400nm) contribute around 1.74 eV of the total photocurrent generated from the CdS/CN-10 electrode. A 6.7-fold enhancement in the degradation of OII is observed between the CdS/CN-10 electrode and pure carbon nitride. Better visible light absorption and heterojunction structure between the two semiconductors leads to better photoactivity. This approach to design composites photocatalyst will provide a new direction in the field of multijunction solar-cell material.



---

*Source: 843873-2014-07-06.xml*