# Bidens pilosa Formulation Improves Blood Homeostasis and β-Cell Function in Men: A Pilot Study

Authors: Bun-Yueh Lai; Tzung-Yan Chen; Shou-Hsien Huang; Tien-Fen Kuo; Ting-Hsiang Chang; Chih-Kang Chiang; Meng-Ting Yang; Cicero Lee-Tian Chang
Journal: Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

B. pilosa has long been purported to have antidiabetes activity, but despite the advancement in phytochemistry and animal models of diabetes, no human clinical trials have been conducted to date. Here, we evaluated the effect of a B. pilosa formulation on fasting blood glucose (FBG), fasting serum insulin, and glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (
H
b
A
1
c
) in diabetic subjects. The B. pilosa formulation reduced the level of FBG and H
b
A
1
c in diabetics but increased fasting serum insulin in healthy subjects. Moreover, combination of B. pilosa formulation with antidiabetic drugs had better glycemic control in diabetics. The homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) data suggested that the antidiabetic activity of this formulation was via improvement of β-cell function. We also tested the safety of the B. pilosa formulation in healthy subjects and observed no obvious side effects. We conclude that B. pilosa has potential as an antidiabetes treatment.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Type 2 diabetes is a global health problem that carries a large economic burden. According to the International Diabetes Foundation 382 million people were diagnosed with diabetes in 2013 and this number is expected to rise to 592 million by 2035 [1]. Current oral antidiabetic drugs have unmet efficacy and undesirable side effects in patients often leading to lethal complications [2]. Therefore, continuing the search for new diabetes treatments is a priority.Over 1200 plants are purported to have antidiabetic activity [3, 4]. Among them,B. pilosahas long been used as an antidiabetic herb in Asia, America, and Africa [5]. However, no clinical trial has ever evaluated the efficacy and safety of this herb [3, 6]. We and other groups have shown thatB. pilosahas hypoglycemic activity in diabetic db/db mice and alloxan-treated mice [7–9]. Three polyynes fromB. pilosawere found to have glucose-lowering activity [8, 9]. Among them, cytopiloyne identified fromB. pilosahad better glucose-reducing activities in diabetic mice than the other two polyynes [9]. We also demonstrated thatB. pilosaand cytopiloyne lowered blood glucose via insulin secretion and islet protection [4]. Further, mechanistic studies showed that cytopiloyne and, probably,B. pilosa exerted antidiabetic action via their regulation of β-cell function [4].Despite some claims of human antidiabetic activity, there have been no modern clinical evaluations ofB. pilosain humans. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of aB. pilosaformulation in human diabetic and healthy subjects.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Efficacy Pilot Study

Fourteen volunteers whose fasting blood glucose was more than 126 mg/dL and/or whose 2 h postmeal prandial blood glucose was more than 200 mg/dL were diagnosed as diabetics based on the American Diabetes Association criteria. They were grouped into 2 groups. One group, 6 diabetics, only consumed theB. pilosaformulation (probetacell) orally at a dose of 400 mg,ter in die, for 3 to 7 months. The other group, 8 diabetics, took antidiabetic drugs plus theB. pilosaformulation. Their blood samples were collected before and after their treatment. Biochemical parameters of the blood samples from both groups were determined (Table 1) based on the manufacturers’ protocols. Briefly, triglyceride (TRIG), total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein (HDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and blood urine nitrogen (BUN) were analyzed with 7600 Clinical Analyzer (Hitachi). Serum insulin was quantified with the ADVIA Centaur ELISA Kits (Siemens). H
b
A
1
c was measured using a DCA 2000 analyzer (Bayer). TheB. pilosaformulation (probetacell) is a commercial functional food in Taiwan (Chun-Yueh Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd.) and HPLC was used to control the quality of the formulations (see Sup. Figure 2 in Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/832314).Table 1
Selected biochemical parameters of diabetic subjects after administration withB. pilosa formulation for 3 to 7 months.
Parametersa
Age (yr)
Diabetic history (yr)
Treatment time (m)
FBG (mg/dL)b
HbA1c (%)
Pretreatment
Posttreatment
Decreased ratioc
P valued
Pretreatment
Posttreatment
Decreased ratioc
P valued
BP without antidiabetic drugse (n
=
6)
65.6  ±  10.5
7.0  ±  5.3
5.0  ±  2.0
201.7  ±  83.3
123.3  ±  18.6
0.33  ±  0.20
0.048
9.1  ±  1.7
7.2  ±  0.7
0.19  ±  0.07
0.033
BP with antidiabetic drugsf (n
=
8)
61.3  ±  11.6
12.4  ±  6.3
3.6  ±  0.9
220  ±  70.9
150  ±  51.3
0.31  ±  0.14
0.040
8.6  ±  0.6
7.7  ±  0.7
0.10  ±  0.05
0.012
aAll data are presented as mean  ±  SD.
bFBG: fasting blood glucose.
cDecreased ratio = (value of pretreatment − value of posttreatment)/value of pretreatment.
dData are presented as mean  ±  SD (standard deviation). Student’s t-test was used for statistical analysis between pretreatment and posttreatment. The P values (<0.05) are considered statistically significant.
eDiabetic patients only consumed BP supplement. The number (n) of volunteers is indicated.
fDiabetic patients consumed antidiabetic drugs and BP supplement (combination therapy). These antidiabetic drugs included metformin (Glucophage) dominantly and acarbose (Glucobay), glibenclamide (Euglucon), glimepiride (Amaryl), and insulin (NovoMix 30 or NPH human insulin/Humulin).


### 2.2. Safety Pilot Study

Blood from seven healthy volunteers was collected before and after they took theB. pilosaformulation (probetacell) orally at a daily dose of 400 mg per person,ter in die, for 3 months. The biochemical parameters (Table 2) of the blood samples were analyzed as above.Table 2
Selected biochemical parameters of healthy volunteers after administration with theB. pilosa formulation for 3 months.
Parametersa
HbA1c (%)
FBG (mg/dL)
PBG (mg/dL)
Fasting insulin (mU/L)
Postprandial insulin (mU/L)
TRIG (mg/dL)
TC (mg/dL)
HDL-c (mg/dL)
LDL-c (mg/dL)
AST (U/L)
ALT (U/L)
BUN (mg/dL)
Creatinine (mg/dL)
Pretreatment(n
=
7)
5.4  ±  0.3
87.6  ±  2.3
111.6  ±  25.7
3.4  ±  1.4
12.5  ±  10.2
85.1  ±  36.0
168.4  ±  27.3
55.8  ±  10.6
86.4  ±  21.1
21.1  ±  7
15.7  ±  4.9
13  ±  3.1
0.8  ±  0.1
Posttreatment(n
=
7)
5.4  ±  0.3
90  ±  6.2
115.1  ±  31.3
4.9  ±  7.7
23.5  ±  16.4
71.6  ±  24.5
161.1  ±  20.9
53.3  ± 7
86.4  ±  19.5
17  ±  2
13.6  ±  3.6
13.4  ±  2.8
0.8  ±  0.1
P valueb
0.86
0.35
0.82
0.62
0.16
0.43
0.58
0.61
1
0.16
0.36
0.8
0.83
aData from seven healthy volunteers are presented as mean ± SD (standard deviation). The number (n) of volunteers is indicated.
bStudent’s t-test is used to compare the parameters before and after the volunteers took the B. pilosa formulation at a daily dose of 400 mg per person, ter in die. No statistical significance is found.


### 2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data from three independent experiments or more are presented as mean ± SEM. Student’st-test was used for statistical analysis of the differences between groups. A P value (
*) of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.


## 2.1. Efficacy Pilot Study

Fourteen volunteers whose fasting blood glucose was more than 126 mg/dL and/or whose 2 h postmeal prandial blood glucose was more than 200 mg/dL were diagnosed as diabetics based on the American Diabetes Association criteria. They were grouped into 2 groups. One group, 6 diabetics, only consumed theB. pilosaformulation (probetacell) orally at a dose of 400 mg,ter in die, for 3 to 7 months. The other group, 8 diabetics, took antidiabetic drugs plus theB. pilosaformulation. Their blood samples were collected before and after their treatment. Biochemical parameters of the blood samples from both groups were determined (Table 1) based on the manufacturers’ protocols. Briefly, triglyceride (TRIG), total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein (HDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and blood urine nitrogen (BUN) were analyzed with 7600 Clinical Analyzer (Hitachi). Serum insulin was quantified with the ADVIA Centaur ELISA Kits (Siemens). H
b
A
1
c was measured using a DCA 2000 analyzer (Bayer). TheB. pilosaformulation (probetacell) is a commercial functional food in Taiwan (Chun-Yueh Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd.) and HPLC was used to control the quality of the formulations (see Sup. Figure 2 in Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/832314).Table 1
Selected biochemical parameters of diabetic subjects after administration withB. pilosa formulation for 3 to 7 months.
Parametersa
Age (yr)
Diabetic history (yr)
Treatment time (m)
FBG (mg/dL)b
HbA1c (%)
Pretreatment
Posttreatment
Decreased ratioc
P valued
Pretreatment
Posttreatment
Decreased ratioc
P valued
BP without antidiabetic drugse (n
=
6)
65.6  ±  10.5
7.0  ±  5.3
5.0  ±  2.0
201.7  ±  83.3
123.3  ±  18.6
0.33  ±  0.20
0.048
9.1  ±  1.7
7.2  ±  0.7
0.19  ±  0.07
0.033
BP with antidiabetic drugsf (n
=
8)
61.3  ±  11.6
12.4  ±  6.3
3.6  ±  0.9
220  ±  70.9
150  ±  51.3
0.31  ±  0.14
0.040
8.6  ±  0.6
7.7  ±  0.7
0.10  ±  0.05
0.012
aAll data are presented as mean  ±  SD.
bFBG: fasting blood glucose.
cDecreased ratio = (value of pretreatment − value of posttreatment)/value of pretreatment.
dData are presented as mean  ±  SD (standard deviation). Student’s t-test was used for statistical analysis between pretreatment and posttreatment. The P values (<0.05) are considered statistically significant.
eDiabetic patients only consumed BP supplement. The number (n) of volunteers is indicated.
fDiabetic patients consumed antidiabetic drugs and BP supplement (combination therapy). These antidiabetic drugs included metformin (Glucophage) dominantly and acarbose (Glucobay), glibenclamide (Euglucon), glimepiride (Amaryl), and insulin (NovoMix 30 or NPH human insulin/Humulin).


## 2.2. Safety Pilot Study

Blood from seven healthy volunteers was collected before and after they took theB. pilosaformulation (probetacell) orally at a daily dose of 400 mg per person,ter in die, for 3 months. The biochemical parameters (Table 2) of the blood samples were analyzed as above.Table 2
Selected biochemical parameters of healthy volunteers after administration with theB. pilosa formulation for 3 months.
Parametersa
HbA1c (%)
FBG (mg/dL)
PBG (mg/dL)
Fasting insulin (mU/L)
Postprandial insulin (mU/L)
TRIG (mg/dL)
TC (mg/dL)
HDL-c (mg/dL)
LDL-c (mg/dL)
AST (U/L)
ALT (U/L)
BUN (mg/dL)
Creatinine (mg/dL)
Pretreatment(n
=
7)
5.4  ±  0.3
87.6  ±  2.3
111.6  ±  25.7
3.4  ±  1.4
12.5  ±  10.2
85.1  ±  36.0
168.4  ±  27.3
55.8  ±  10.6
86.4  ±  21.1
21.1  ±  7
15.7  ±  4.9
13  ±  3.1
0.8  ±  0.1
Posttreatment(n
=
7)
5.4  ±  0.3
90  ±  6.2
115.1  ±  31.3
4.9  ±  7.7
23.5  ±  16.4
71.6  ±  24.5
161.1  ±  20.9
53.3  ± 7
86.4  ±  19.5
17  ±  2
13.6  ±  3.6
13.4  ±  2.8
0.8  ±  0.1
P valueb
0.86
0.35
0.82
0.62
0.16
0.43
0.58
0.61
1
0.16
0.36
0.8
0.83
aData from seven healthy volunteers are presented as mean ± SD (standard deviation). The number (n) of volunteers is indicated.
bStudent’s t-test is used to compare the parameters before and after the volunteers took the B. pilosa formulation at a daily dose of 400 mg per person, ter in die. No statistical significance is found.


## 2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data from three independent experiments or more are presented as mean ± SEM. Student’st-test was used for statistical analysis of the differences between groups. A P value (
*) of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1.B. pilosa Formulation Improves Type 2 Diabetes via Promotion of β-Cell Function

Our group and others previously demonstrated thatB. pilosaexerted antidiabetic activity in mouse models, so in this study we verified this effect in humans. First, we evaluated the beneficial effect of theB. pilosaformulation on subjects with type 2 diabetes. We found that those who only took theB. pilosaformulation had fasting blood glucose levels of 201.7
±
83.3 and 123.3
±
18.6, respectively, before and after treatment with theB. pilosaformulation (Table 1). Similarly, the diabetics had H
b
A
1
c levels of 9.1
±
1.7 and 7.2
±
0.7, respectively, before and after the treatment with theB. pilosaformulation (Table 1). The HOMA-IR and HOMA-β are commonly used to assess insulin resistance and β-cell function, respectively [10]. Treatment with theB. pilosaformulation significantly increased β-cell function of the participants as shown by the HOMA-β values. In contrast, the treatment did not affect their insulin resistance, as shown by the HOMA-IR values (Sup. Figure 1). Accordingly, theB. pilosaformulation boosted serum insulin level in healthy persons (Table 2). Besides, we tested the combination effect of theB. pilosaformulation. We found that those who only took antidiabetic drugs and theB. pilosaformulation had fasting blood glucose levels of 220
±
70.9 and 150
±
51.3, respectively, before and after the combination treatment (Table 1). However, the combination use of theB. pilosaformulation seemed better than its single use based on the data on the decreased ratio of fasting blood glucose and H
b
A
1
c (Table 1).Overall, the data from this study are in good agreement with previous studies in mice [4] that suggested thatB. pilosaenhanced insulin secretion and islet preservation via β-cell regulation.


### 3.2.B. pilosa Formulation Had No Obvious Side Effects

Next, we assessed the 90-day safety of theB. pilosaformulation in 7 diabetes-free volunteers. We found that 90-day administration with theB. pilosaformulation showed no obvious adverse effects (Table 2). In addition, heavy metals (As, Pb, Cd, and Hg) and 251 pesticides in theB. pilosaformulation used in the study were determined and their concentrations are below the limit of detection (Figure 1 and Sup. Table 1). The Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations recognizesB. pilosaas a staple food [11]. The Ministry of Health and Welfare in Taiwan also allows its use as an ingredient in food for human consumption. Previous studies by our group and others found no toxicity ofB. pilosain mouse models [5, 6] and rats [12]. However, comprehensive scientific study of the safety ofB. pilosahas not been conducted. In this work, clinical data suggest thatB. pilosaat 400 mg,ter in die, has no noticeable toxicity (Table 2). Large-scale clinical trials on the efficacy and toxicology ofB. pilosain humans are required prior to its further medical use.Figure 1
Report on the contamination of pesticides and heavy metals in theB. pilosaformulation used in this study. The content of the pesticides and heavy metals in theB. pilosaformulation was determined and certificated by SGS Taiwan Ltd.In summary, our clinical data demonstrated that theB. pilosaformulation had an antidiabetic action and no obvious side effects in humans. This action involves the regulation of β-cells.


## 3.1.B. pilosa Formulation Improves Type 2 Diabetes via Promotion of β-Cell Function

Our group and others previously demonstrated thatB. pilosaexerted antidiabetic activity in mouse models, so in this study we verified this effect in humans. First, we evaluated the beneficial effect of theB. pilosaformulation on subjects with type 2 diabetes. We found that those who only took theB. pilosaformulation had fasting blood glucose levels of 201.7
±
83.3 and 123.3
±
18.6, respectively, before and after treatment with theB. pilosaformulation (Table 1). Similarly, the diabetics had H
b
A
1
c levels of 9.1
±
1.7 and 7.2
±
0.7, respectively, before and after the treatment with theB. pilosaformulation (Table 1). The HOMA-IR and HOMA-β are commonly used to assess insulin resistance and β-cell function, respectively [10]. Treatment with theB. pilosaformulation significantly increased β-cell function of the participants as shown by the HOMA-β values. In contrast, the treatment did not affect their insulin resistance, as shown by the HOMA-IR values (Sup. Figure 1). Accordingly, theB. pilosaformulation boosted serum insulin level in healthy persons (Table 2). Besides, we tested the combination effect of theB. pilosaformulation. We found that those who only took antidiabetic drugs and theB. pilosaformulation had fasting blood glucose levels of 220
±
70.9 and 150
±
51.3, respectively, before and after the combination treatment (Table 1). However, the combination use of theB. pilosaformulation seemed better than its single use based on the data on the decreased ratio of fasting blood glucose and H
b
A
1
c (Table 1).Overall, the data from this study are in good agreement with previous studies in mice [4] that suggested thatB. pilosaenhanced insulin secretion and islet preservation via β-cell regulation.


## 3.2.B. pilosa Formulation Had No Obvious Side Effects

Next, we assessed the 90-day safety of theB. pilosaformulation in 7 diabetes-free volunteers. We found that 90-day administration with theB. pilosaformulation showed no obvious adverse effects (Table 2). In addition, heavy metals (As, Pb, Cd, and Hg) and 251 pesticides in theB. pilosaformulation used in the study were determined and their concentrations are below the limit of detection (Figure 1 and Sup. Table 1). The Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations recognizesB. pilosaas a staple food [11]. The Ministry of Health and Welfare in Taiwan also allows its use as an ingredient in food for human consumption. Previous studies by our group and others found no toxicity ofB. pilosain mouse models [5, 6] and rats [12]. However, comprehensive scientific study of the safety ofB. pilosahas not been conducted. In this work, clinical data suggest thatB. pilosaat 400 mg,ter in die, has no noticeable toxicity (Table 2). Large-scale clinical trials on the efficacy and toxicology ofB. pilosain humans are required prior to its further medical use.Figure 1
Report on the contamination of pesticides and heavy metals in theB. pilosaformulation used in this study. The content of the pesticides and heavy metals in theB. pilosaformulation was determined and certificated by SGS Taiwan Ltd.In summary, our clinical data demonstrated that theB. pilosaformulation had an antidiabetic action and no obvious side effects in humans. This action involves the regulation of β-cells.



---

*Source: 832314-2015-03-18.xml*