# Friction and Wear Studies Using Taguchi Method: Application to the Characterization of Carbon-Silicon Carbide Tribological Couples of Automotive Water Pump Seals

Authors: Pascal Déprez; Philippe Hivart; Jean François Coutouly; Etienne Debarre
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2009)

---

## Abstract

An experimental design based on the Taguchi method has been applied to optimize the use of a dynamic sealing element of water pump of automotives combustion engines. A carbon primary ring and a silicon carbide mating ring set up this dynamic sealing element. The aim of this work was to experimentally determine the crossed influence of the primary ring variant, the normal load, the surrounding, the mating ring finishing, and the rotational frequency on the dynamic friction coefficient and on the wear of carbon primary ring-silicon carbide mating ring tribological couples. The coefficient of dynamic friction and the wear depend on the design factors. They are also functions of theinteractions between these experimental factors, from the implementation of an experimental design. The results obtained allow the optimal functioning condition to be determined and the best friction couple to be used for a given dynamic sealing application.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Mechanical seals are used throughout industry in numerous rotating equipments such as centrifugal pumps, reactors, mixers, blowers, and compressors. The present investigation concerns the dynamic sealing element of water pump of automotives combustion engines. This mechanical seal consists of two subassemblies, namely, a static head (primary ring) and a dynamic seat (mating ring). The sealing of the primary ring coupled to the mating ring is subjected to pressure and temperature variations and undergoes wear due to friction. The performance of a mechanical seal depends upon a wide range of factors (equipment design, operating conditions, support system, etc.). The selection of the materials of construction of the mechanical seal is particularly important to assure its function and its service life. Different materials (metals, ceramics, elastomers, PTFE, carbon, etc.) were successfully tested [1, 2].The tribological properties of soft materials like carbon against hard mating materials like ceramics are quite unstudied. Nevertheless, due to its lamellar structure, graphite has been known for many years for its low-friction coefficient, even in the case of dry friction [3]. Moreover, carbon is inert, stable, and self lubricating. Concerning the friction and the wear behaviour of carbon against ceramics, it was shown that the friction properties of carbon films are influenced by the hardness of the ceramic slider [4, 5], and low and stable friction coefficients were measured [6]. A previous work [7] showed that graphite wear is due to surface fragmentation, crystals being torn off through the lamellas, rather than being chipped off along them. Other tests were carried out on the friction and the wear of carbon on ceramic [8, 9]. Friction coefficients in the range of 0.1 to 0.2 were determined, and a tendency of a carbon transfer onto the ceramic, producing a dust caused by wear, was noted. There is apparently no direct correlation between the wear rate, the hardness, and the compression stress of the tested carbons. In the case of dry friction, wear is due [8] to material transfer from the worn carbon surface and to the microcrack formation due to surface fatigue. Finally, both processes produce plates. Fragments of these wear plates do not apparently remain intact, but they leave the contacted surfaces and they are ground into a fine powder by successive passages of the slider.In order to minimize the effects of friction and wear, we study a couple of new friction materials. It must be capable of supporting the operating temperature and the chemical environment of the application. It has also to provide a good tribological couple to allow low wear and low friction during operation. This tested couple of materials able to work together to allow the seal to function properly is the couple silicon carbide/carbon material. Silicon carbide is an inert ceramic material characterized by its high hardness, high stiffness, low-thermal expansion, and a good wear resistance. It is an interesting material for extreme tribo-mechanical applications. The carbon material used is a resin impregnated carbon. It is a mixture of amorphous carbon/graphite that has been impregnated with a thermoset resin. Due to good frictional properties, it is the most common type of carbon for mechanical seals used in industry.In order to improve the performance and reliability of the tested mechanical seal and due to the number of factors, an experimental design based on Taguchi method is carried out. Indeed, the effects of five factors (primary ring variant, normal load, surrounding, mating ring finishing, and the rotational frequency) and of the ten interactions between them on the dynamic friction coefficient and on the wear are studied.


## 2. Materials and Methods

The primary ring and the mating ring are the two most important elementary parts of sealing for which the basic principle is to ensure sealing between the two friction faces, in relative movement, lubricated by a liquid film.The studied primary rings are moulded by hot compression from a thermohardening resin base and a mixture, with specific proportions of graphite, coke, antimony, and zinc stearate. With the same chemical composition, two carbon materials were obtained from different thermal processes. So, carbon 1 and carbon 2 are carbon materials of a thermohardening resin base which was hot polymerized, and then sterilizated (250–300°C) to finish the polymerisation. But, for the carbon 1 a later high-temperature process (700–1100°C) was carried out in a neutral atmosphere to avoid oxidation. This process enables the material to become compact and to form a carbon network in the resin. Table1 summarizes some properties of the two different studied materials. It is interesting to note that the carbon 1 variant is a better thermal conductor and has a lower thermal expansion coefficient than the carbon 2 variant.Table 1
Physical properties of the studied materials.
Carbon 1Carbon 2Porous silicon carbideYoung modulus (GPa)2516350Thermal conductivity (W·m-1·C-1 )205130Thermal expansion coefficient (10-6·C-1)414.84Poisson coefficient0.210.210.25Density1.851.772.82Tensile strength (MPa)4528160Compressive strength (MPa)1801001500Brinell hardness (daN/mm2)48.4440.08Vickers hardness (daN/mm2)2200–2800The tested mating rings are sintered porous silicon carbide. The part of the porosity is about 10–14%, with pore diameters ranging from 10 to 200μm. The chemical composition of the silicon carbide is as follows: SiC, 98.5% minimum; Si free, less than 2000 ppm; SiO2, less than 2000 ppm; Fe, less than 1000 ppm; other impurities (Al, Ca, Mg, K, etc.), less than 1000 ppm. It should be noted that porous silicon carbide is a good thermal conductor and also has a low-thermal expansion coefficient (Table 1).The arithmetic roughness of the primary ring and the mating ring is a function of the final lapping applied to the surface of these parts. A final lapping period followed by glazing (3μm) is carried out on the primary ring while the mating ring undergoes another final lapping period (boron 400) or a glazing (3 μm).Figure1 shows the set-up for the friction test implemented during this study and the geometry and dimensions of the mating ring and the primary ring of the studied water pump of automotives combustion engines.Friction test set-up and geometry and dimensions of the mating ring (a) and the primary ring (b).
(a)(b)The tribometer used was studied in order to carry out friction tests on a couple of materials, without sensitive differential pressure pairs of materials, in liquid-surrounding air condition.  The tank of the tribometer is assembled to turn between two bearings. The friction ring is assembled onto the the bottom of the tank. The tank contains about 1 liter of cooling liquid composed of 65% abelledesd water and 35% glycol. This glycol-based coolant has also the function of a lubricant. An electronic torque-meter, linked abelle the tank and a fixed part of the machine, allows the measurement of  the resisting torque. During the test, the temperature of the liquid in the tank and the temperature measured at 0.5 mm from the friction face are taken by using thermocouples. The rotational speed of the primary ring is raised through the use of a cog wheel and a sensor. These measurements are carried out at a frequency of 50 Hz by means of a data-acquisition board. An average of the measurements is taken and recorded every second.The dynamic friction coefficient stabilized(R1) and the wear (R2) of the carbon primary rings have been recorded after testing the materials for 10 hours. During the friction test, the temperature maximal (R3), five abelledes under the friction surface of the primary ring, was also recorded.This study is conducted with the Taguchi method by means of “orthogonal array” experiments [10, 11]. This method based on orthogonal array experiments gives much reduced variance for the experiment with optimum settings of control factors. The Taguchi approach provides also more complete interaction information than typical fractional factorial designs. In order to investigate the friction (R1), the wear (R2), and the temperature (R3), a suitable orthogonal array [L16(215)] was selected for carrying out the experimentation. Five factors are considered. Each of them has two levels: the material of the primary ring (level 1: carbon 1; level 2: carbon 2), the surface finishing of the mating ring (level 1: boron 400; level 2:  glazing 3 μm), the normal load (level 1: 1 daN; level 2: 5 daN), the surrounding (level 1: dry; level 2: lubricated), and the rotational frequency (level 1: 50 rad·s-1; level 2: 400 rad·s-1). These factors and levels used in the orthogonal analysis and the 10 combinations of these 5 factors, arranged according to the 15 columns of the orthogonal array L16(215), are shown in Table 2. Instead of having to test the 32 possible combinations like the factorial design, the Taguchi method tests only 16. This allows for the collection of the necessary data to determine which factors and interactions most affect friction, wear, and temperature with a minimum amount of experimentation, thus saving time and resources. The 16 various tests, according to the 16 lines of the orthogonal array L16(215) which corresponds to 25 factorial experiment design, were realised. An analysis of variance on the collected data from the Taguchi design of experiments can be used to identify significant factors and interactions between the factors. A predictive mathematical model can also be developed, using nonlinear regression method, to optimize the performance outputs (R1,R2,R3).Table 2
Taguchi orthogonal array L16(215).
F2F5I1-2F1I1-4I2-4I8-15F4I1-8I2-8I4-15I4-8I2-15I1-15F3R1R2R31111111111111110.691781111111222222220.412271112222111122220.304321112222222211110.394651221122112211220.422521221122221122110.18161421222211112222110.26231721222211221111220.742482121212121212120.263352121212212121210.55261942122121121221210.43211372122121212112120.3170462211221122112210.62394732211221211221120.4151392212112122121120.3761252212112211212210.57289535Factor Levels for Each Studied Factor:
F1:
primary ring variant (level 1: carbon 1, level 2: carbon 2),F2:
normal load (level 1: 1 daN, level 2: 5 daN),F3:
surrounding (level 1: dry, level 2: lubricated),F4:
mating ring finishing (level 1: 3μm, level 2: boron 400),F5:
rotational frequency: (level 1: 50 rad/s, level 2: 400 rad/s).Combinations between Factors:
Ix-y:
interaction column between the two factors allocated to columnsx and y.Experimental Results:
R1:
coefficient of dynamic friction after 10 hours of friction test,R2:
wear of the carbon primary ring (μm) after 10 hours of friction test,R3:
temperature maximal (°C) measured during the friction test, five millimetres under the friction surface of the primary ring.Figure2 shows the linear graph associated with the orthogonal array L16(215). This linear graph allows to affect the interactions (level 2) between the five studied factors. For example, it shows two points abelled 1 and 2, indicating that two factors can be assigned to columns 1 and 2 of the orthogonal array L16(215). The line 3 connecting them indicates that the interaction between columns 1 and 2 is present in column 3.Figure 2
Linear graph associated with the orthogonal array L16(215).


## 3. Results and Discussion

For the studied process to be optimized, five control factors which directly decide the value of the coefficient of dynamic friction and of the wear are considered. Due to better stability, the average effects of these studied factors are established after 10 hours of friction. The Taguchi method based on “orthogonal array” experiments gives much reduced variance for the experiment with “optimum settings” of control factors. The “orthogonal array” experiments help also in data analysis and prediction of optimum results. For that purpose, the following formulae will be considered.The middle effect of factorA at the level i is(1)EAi=(averageoftheresponsesRwhenthefactorAisattheleveli)-Ravg
with Ravg   as the general average of the response R.The interaction effect of factorA at level i and factor B at level j is(2)EAiBj=(averageofresponsesRwhenfactorAisatleveliandBatlevelj)-EAi-EBj-Ravg.The squares sum of factorA is:(3)SA=(NnA)∑i=1nA(EAi)2
with N=16 (number of tests) and nA  the number of factor A levels.The squares sum of the interaction factorA and factor B i:(4)SAB=(NnA·nB)∑i,j=1nA,nB(EAiBj)2.
The percentage of contribution of factor A on the response is(5)%A=(SAStotal)·100.
The percentage of contribution of the interaction factor A and factor B on the response is(6)%AB=(SABStotal)·100.


### 3.1. Study of the Dynamic Friction Coefficient

Figure3 shows the main effects of the five studied factors on the coefficient of dynamic friction (R1) after 10 hours of friction test. The level change of factors induces a variation of the value of this coefficient.Figure 3
Main effects on the coefficient of dynamic friction(R1).The degree of the effect of a factor is indicated by plots, as shown in Figure3. The larger the deviation from horizontal, the stronger the effect of the factor. The most significant factor influencing the coefficient of dynamic friction after 10 hours of friction test is the environment. A decrease of this coefficient (about 13%) in a lubricated environment is noted.On the other hand, the transitions from carbon 1 to carbon 2 for the primary ring, from 5 daN to 1 daN for the normal load, from a boron 400 finish to a glazing 3μm finish for the mating ring, and from 400 rad/s to 50 rad/s for the rotational frequency do not strongly influence the decrease of the coefficient of dynamic friction after 10 hours of friction test (less than 6.5%).However, it is interesting to note that this coefficient is higher with the carbon 1 primary ring material than with the carbon 2. For the couple carbon 1—porous silicon carbide, carbon traces in the porosities and on the friction face of the mating ring are rarely seen; with the couple carbon 2—porous silicon carbide, deposits and traces of carbon are nearly always observed on the porous silicon carbide mating ring. This phenomenon is probably due to a lower hardness for the carbon 2 with regard to the carbon 1. Also, the porosities tend to be closed by the carbon. The lubricating quality of the graphite, the presence of graphite in the porosities of the carbide, and the traces of graphite on the friction surface of the mating ring explain the decrease of the coefficient of dynamic friction after 10 hours of friction test with the carbon 2.If the effect of a factor is influenced by the level change of another factor, there is a phenomenon of interaction between these two factors. Figure4 shows that the effect of the 5 studied factors is influenced by the level change of the other factors (not parallel segments). Indeed, both segments which represent each of the 10 interactions are not parallel. They translate different variations of responses and so show that the interactions of level 2 between the design parameters are significant.Figure 4
Interaction effects on the coefficient of dynamic friction(R1).The degree of interaction between two factors is indicated by plots, as shown in Figure4. The larger the deviation from parallel, the stronger the interaction. The degree of interaction can be calculated from an analysis of variance, which is described in paragraph 3.3.The most significant interactions are the interactions between primary ring material/mating ring finishing, normal load/surrounding and surrounding/rotational frequency.It is interesting to note that the effect of the primary ring material on the coefficient of dynamic friction after 10 hours of friction test is compensated by the effect of the normal load and of the relative speed.In the case of carbon 2 primary ring material, the coefficient of dynamic friction after 10 hours of friction test is the same with a normal load of 1 daN or 5 daN. The work of Golubiev [12] explains this phenomenon. During his attempts to measure the pressure in the interface of dynamic waterproof guards, he observed the presence of microhumps due to thermal conductivities and thermal expansion coefficients as well as the locally different frictional temperatures (carbon 2 is a lower thermal conductor and has a better thermal expansion coefficient than the carbon 1). With intersecting contact pressure, owing to the dilatation of the carbon produced by the heating which is a function of the speed, the carbon face is pressed in the pores due to its low coefficient of elasticity. In case of higher load, the carbon particles are cut inducing the decrease of the coefficient of dynamic friction.The interaction between the normal load and the environment shows that the effect of the load is compensated by the environment. In the case of dry running, the coefficient of dynamic friction after 10 hours of friction test increases proportionally with the load. However, in a lubricated environment, it diminishes when the load increases. The cavities formed from the pores create greasing reserves and zones of locally limited pressure. With increasing contact pressure, the antagonistic carbon face is pressed into the pores, and ejects the coolant (Figure5).(a)  Drainage of the lubricant from a cavity to another one. (b) micrograph of the porous silicon carbide.
(a)(b)Taguchi method allowed to bring to light the relative contributions of the design factors and of their interactions on the coefficient of dynamic friction of the studied carbon-silicon carbide tribological couple.


### 3.2. Study of the Wear

Figure6 shows the main effects of the five studied factors on the wear (R2) of the carbon primary ring after 10 hours of friction test. The obtained results show that these factors have an important influence on the measured wear.Figure 6
Main effects on the wear(R2).With carbon 1,having a higher hardness than carbon 2, the fact of using a carbon 1 primary ring in the place of a carbon 2 induces a decrease of the wear of about 58%. The most significant factor influencing the carbon primary ring wear is the normal load applied on the dynamic sealing element. With regard to a normal load of 5 daN, a normal load of 1 daN induces a significant decrease of the wear of about 88%. A lubricated environment makes the wear of the carbon primary ring decrease about 77%. Also, the transition from a boron 400 finishing to a glazing 3μm finishing for the silicon carbide mating ring induces a decrease of the wear of about 76%. Finally, with regard to a rotational frequency of 400 rad/s, a rotational frequency of 50 rad/s induces a decrease of the wear of about 65%.The roughness of the mating ring as well as the surrounding influence the wear of the carbon [13]. The values of wear for dry and limited frictional states are compared by Holm [14]. According to Holm, a difference from 1 to 10 can be observed. In the case of dry friction, the influence of the material is strongly in evidence and the values for the wear can extend over two orders of magnitude. It was noticed that the coefficient of friction does not ever increase in proportion to the wear [15–17].Figure7 shows that the interaction effects of the design factors on the wear of the carbon primary ring after 10 hours of friction test  are influenced by the level change of the other factors (not parallel segments). The most significant interactions are the interactions between primary ring variant/surrounding, normal load/surrounding, normal load/mating ring finishing, and surrounding/rotational frequency.Figure 7
Interaction effects on the wear(R2).For the carbon 1, the wear after 10 hours of friction test is weakly influenced by the normal load, the surrounding, the mating ring finishing, and the rotational frequency. On the other hand, with carbon 2, this wear is strongly influenced by the level change of the other factors. The lower hardness of carbon 2 compared to carbon 1 can explain these results.For a normal load of 1 daN, the wear is not influenced by the level change of the other factors. On the other hand, for a normal load of 5 daN, the wear is strongly influenced by their level change. There is an increasing effect of the temperature with the normal contact load. An increase in the frictional pressure is mainly related to an increase in the temperature of the waterproof interface and thus the effects are manifested as wear. The increase in temperature often causes a decrease in the resistance and in the hardness. It can also induce the evaporation of the lubricating film in the waterproof interface. In dry friction test, the wear of different materials from ceramic to carbon rapidly adopts significant values with increasing temperature. In dry or in lubricated friction test, this increase in temperature induces a risk of creating cracks, which in turn increase the wear [18]. This can result from mechanical or thermal overloads, from a dry running or a lower cooling, from variations of pressure, from high speeds or alterations of the conditions of the interface.The graph of the interaction between the surrounding and the rotational frequency (Figure7) shows that in a lubricated surrounding, the wear is more important with the smallest rotational frequency, which is 50 rad/s. But, according to Archard [19], an increase in wear is proportional to an increase in the frictional speed. This is true, provided that no additional hydrodynamic effect is produced. According to the measurements made by Paxton and Shobert [7] and by Wisander and Johnson [20], the wear can present a tendency towards being stationary or descending as a function of speed. This phenomenon depends strongly upon the couple of materials and the lubricating fluid.


### 3.3. Study of the Temperature

The temperature maximal(R3) obtained during the friction test, five millimeters under the friction surface of the primary ring, is measured (Table 2). From the average effects graphs of the five studied factors (Figure 8), it is shown that the normal load, the surrounding and the rotational strongly frequency influence this temperature. The transitions from 5 daN to 1 daN for the normal load, from dry to lubricated surrounding, and from 400 rad/s to 50 rad/s for the rotational frequency induce a significant decrease of this temperature. On the other hand, the primary ring variant and the mating ring finishing do not influence it significantly. It is interesting to note that different thermal conductivity coefficient, the temperature maximal measured, under the same parametric conditions, is equivalent with the carbon 1 and the carbon 2 primary ring material.Figure 8
Influence of the studied factors on the temperature maximal measured during the friction test, five millimeters under the friction surface of the primary ring(R3).The increase in temperature of the dynamic sealing element induces a risk of thermal cracks. And so, it reduces its service life. Control of thermal cracking is of a great importance to ensure a desired service life time and function of the studied dynamic sealing element. In the present study, primary ring cracks have been experimentally reproduced (Figure9).(a) surface of the primary ring crack; (b) crack by thermal dilatation. Parametric conditions of the friction test : carbon 1 (primary ring variant), 5 daN  (normal load), dry (surrounding), 3μm (mating ring finishing), 400 rad/s (rotational frequency). Temperature maximal measured during the test: 473°C.
(a)(b)Factors affecting the initiation of thermal cracks as well as the wear of the carbon primary ring can result from mechanical or thermal overloads, from dry running or a lower cooling, from variations of pressure, from high speeds, or alteration of the interface. It can be noticed that no thermal crack has been observed in lubricated regime.


### 3.4. Modelling and Analysis of the Variance

The prediction of the coefficient of dynamic friction and the wear models for the studied carbon-silicon carbide tribological couple were developed based on the following matrix model:(7)M=Ravg+[+EA1-EA2][A]+⋯+t[A][+EA1B1-EA1B2-EA2B1+EA2B2][B]+⋯+RES
with   M: calculated response, Ravg: general average of the response R, [A]:  Vector “level indicator’’ of the factor A, [A]=[10] for A at level 1 or [01] at level 2,  t[A]: Vector transposed of vector [A], and Res: Residual term.The matrix models of the coefficient of dynamic friction and the wear after 10 hours of friction test are established by taking into account the five studied factors, as well as the ten interactions between these factors. The two matrix models(M1,M2) allow determining the best combination among 32 possible to minimize the coefficient of dynamic friction (R1) and the wear (R2). From the matrix model M1, the combination of factors minimizing the coefficient of dynamic friction after 10 hours of friction test is(i)
primary ring material(F1):  carbon 2,(ii)
normal load(F2): 5 daN,(iii)
surrounding(F3):  lubricated,(iv)
mating ring finishing(F4): 3 μm glazing,(v)
rotational frequency(F5):  50 rad/s,the combination of factors minimizing the wear after 10 hours of friction test is, according to the matrix modelM2,(i)
primary ring material(F1):  carbon 1 or carbon 2,(ii)
normal load(F2):  1 daN,(iii)
surrounding(F3):  lubricated,(iv)
mating ring finishing(F4):  3 μm glazing,(v)
rotational frequency(F5):  400 rad/s.The influence of carbon material on the wear is not significant.Indeed, with a normal load of 1 daN, in a lubricated environment, with a 3μm glazing mating ring finishing and a rotational frequency of 400 rad/s, the use of carbon 1 or carbon 2 mating ring changes the wear rate less than 0.3%.(8)M1=0.431+[+0.011-0.011][F1]+[-0.008+0.008][F2]+[+0.03-0.03][F3]+[-0.013+0.013][F4]+[-0.014+0.014][F5]+t[F1][-0.009+0.009+0.009-0.009][F2]+t[F1][+0.037-0.037-0.037+0.037][F3]+t[F1][+0.067-0.067-0.067+0.067][F4]+t[F1][+0.048-0.048-0.048+0.048][F5]+t[F2][-0.073+0.073+0.073-0.073][F3]+t[F2][+0.006-0.006-0.006+0.006][F4]+t[F2][+0.037-0.037-0.037+0.037][F5]+t[F3][+0.051-0.051-0.051+0.051][F4]+t[F3][+0.067-0.067-0.067+0.067][F5]+t[F4][+0.015-0.015-0.015+0.015][F5]+RES,M2=32.062+[-13.262+13.262][F1]+[-25.312+25.312][F2]+[+20.313-20.313][F3]+[-19.687+19.687][F4]+[-15.687+15.687][F5]+t[F1][+11.762-11.762-11.762+11.762][F2]+t[F1][-18.613+18.613+18.613-18.613][F3]+t[F1][+12.137-12.137-12.137+12.137][F4]+t[F1][+4.887-4.887-4.887+4.887][F5]+t[F2][-18.263+18.263+18.263-18.263][F3]+t[F2][+20.437-20.437-20.437+20.437][F4]+t[F2][+11.687-11.687-11.687+11.687][F5]+t[F3][-11.688+11.688+11.688-11.688][F4]+t[F3][-23.688+23.688+23.688-23.688][F5]+t[F4][+10.562-10.562-10.562+10.562][F5]+RES
with  M1: calculated coefficient of dynamic friction,  M2: calculated wear, [Fx]: Vector “level indicator’’ of the factor Fx, t[Fx]: Vector transposed of vector [Fx], and Res: Residual term.An analysis of the variance allows determining the percentage of contribution of every factor and interaction on the coefficient of dynamic friction and on the wear after 10 hours of friction test. These percentages of contribution of the five studied factors and of their interactions are shown in Table3.Table 3
Percentage of contribution of every factor and interaction on the coefficient of  dynamic friction(R1) and on the wear (R2) after 10 hours of friction test.
FactorsR1R2primary ring variant0.49%3.72%normal load0.26%13.57%surrounding3.68%8.74%mating ring finishing0.69%8.21%rotational frequency0.8%5.21%Interactionsprimary ring variant/normal load0.39%2.93%primary ring variant/surrounding5.63%7.34%primary ring variant/mating ring finishing18.43%3.12%primary ring variant/rotational frequency9.47%0.5%normal load/surrounding22.33%7.06%normal load/mating ring finishing0.15%8.85%normal load/rotational frequency5.63%2.89%surrounding/mating ring finishing10.69%2.89%surrounding/rotational frequency18.43%11.88%mating ring finishing/rotational frequency0.93%2.36%The percentages of contribution on the coefficient of dynamic friction reveal that the influence of the five studied factors is weak. On the other hand, these factors acting in interaction with another factor have a significant influence on the coefficient of dynamic friction after 10 hours of friction test. This analysis of the variance confirms that the most significant interactions are the interactions between primary ring material/mating ring finishing, normal load/surrounding, and surrounding/rotational frequency.Table3 shows that three factors and four interactions have a significant influence on the wear, with a percentage of contribution superior to 7%.


## 3.1. Study of the Dynamic Friction Coefficient

Figure3 shows the main effects of the five studied factors on the coefficient of dynamic friction (R1) after 10 hours of friction test. The level change of factors induces a variation of the value of this coefficient.Figure 3
Main effects on the coefficient of dynamic friction(R1).The degree of the effect of a factor is indicated by plots, as shown in Figure3. The larger the deviation from horizontal, the stronger the effect of the factor. The most significant factor influencing the coefficient of dynamic friction after 10 hours of friction test is the environment. A decrease of this coefficient (about 13%) in a lubricated environment is noted.On the other hand, the transitions from carbon 1 to carbon 2 for the primary ring, from 5 daN to 1 daN for the normal load, from a boron 400 finish to a glazing 3μm finish for the mating ring, and from 400 rad/s to 50 rad/s for the rotational frequency do not strongly influence the decrease of the coefficient of dynamic friction after 10 hours of friction test (less than 6.5%).However, it is interesting to note that this coefficient is higher with the carbon 1 primary ring material than with the carbon 2. For the couple carbon 1—porous silicon carbide, carbon traces in the porosities and on the friction face of the mating ring are rarely seen; with the couple carbon 2—porous silicon carbide, deposits and traces of carbon are nearly always observed on the porous silicon carbide mating ring. This phenomenon is probably due to a lower hardness for the carbon 2 with regard to the carbon 1. Also, the porosities tend to be closed by the carbon. The lubricating quality of the graphite, the presence of graphite in the porosities of the carbide, and the traces of graphite on the friction surface of the mating ring explain the decrease of the coefficient of dynamic friction after 10 hours of friction test with the carbon 2.If the effect of a factor is influenced by the level change of another factor, there is a phenomenon of interaction between these two factors. Figure4 shows that the effect of the 5 studied factors is influenced by the level change of the other factors (not parallel segments). Indeed, both segments which represent each of the 10 interactions are not parallel. They translate different variations of responses and so show that the interactions of level 2 between the design parameters are significant.Figure 4
Interaction effects on the coefficient of dynamic friction(R1).The degree of interaction between two factors is indicated by plots, as shown in Figure4. The larger the deviation from parallel, the stronger the interaction. The degree of interaction can be calculated from an analysis of variance, which is described in paragraph 3.3.The most significant interactions are the interactions between primary ring material/mating ring finishing, normal load/surrounding and surrounding/rotational frequency.It is interesting to note that the effect of the primary ring material on the coefficient of dynamic friction after 10 hours of friction test is compensated by the effect of the normal load and of the relative speed.In the case of carbon 2 primary ring material, the coefficient of dynamic friction after 10 hours of friction test is the same with a normal load of 1 daN or 5 daN. The work of Golubiev [12] explains this phenomenon. During his attempts to measure the pressure in the interface of dynamic waterproof guards, he observed the presence of microhumps due to thermal conductivities and thermal expansion coefficients as well as the locally different frictional temperatures (carbon 2 is a lower thermal conductor and has a better thermal expansion coefficient than the carbon 1). With intersecting contact pressure, owing to the dilatation of the carbon produced by the heating which is a function of the speed, the carbon face is pressed in the pores due to its low coefficient of elasticity. In case of higher load, the carbon particles are cut inducing the decrease of the coefficient of dynamic friction.The interaction between the normal load and the environment shows that the effect of the load is compensated by the environment. In the case of dry running, the coefficient of dynamic friction after 10 hours of friction test increases proportionally with the load. However, in a lubricated environment, it diminishes when the load increases. The cavities formed from the pores create greasing reserves and zones of locally limited pressure. With increasing contact pressure, the antagonistic carbon face is pressed into the pores, and ejects the coolant (Figure5).(a)  Drainage of the lubricant from a cavity to another one. (b) micrograph of the porous silicon carbide.
(a)(b)Taguchi method allowed to bring to light the relative contributions of the design factors and of their interactions on the coefficient of dynamic friction of the studied carbon-silicon carbide tribological couple.


## 3.2. Study of the Wear

Figure6 shows the main effects of the five studied factors on the wear (R2) of the carbon primary ring after 10 hours of friction test. The obtained results show that these factors have an important influence on the measured wear.Figure 6
Main effects on the wear(R2).With carbon 1,having a higher hardness than carbon 2, the fact of using a carbon 1 primary ring in the place of a carbon 2 induces a decrease of the wear of about 58%. The most significant factor influencing the carbon primary ring wear is the normal load applied on the dynamic sealing element. With regard to a normal load of 5 daN, a normal load of 1 daN induces a significant decrease of the wear of about 88%. A lubricated environment makes the wear of the carbon primary ring decrease about 77%. Also, the transition from a boron 400 finishing to a glazing 3μm finishing for the silicon carbide mating ring induces a decrease of the wear of about 76%. Finally, with regard to a rotational frequency of 400 rad/s, a rotational frequency of 50 rad/s induces a decrease of the wear of about 65%.The roughness of the mating ring as well as the surrounding influence the wear of the carbon [13]. The values of wear for dry and limited frictional states are compared by Holm [14]. According to Holm, a difference from 1 to 10 can be observed. In the case of dry friction, the influence of the material is strongly in evidence and the values for the wear can extend over two orders of magnitude. It was noticed that the coefficient of friction does not ever increase in proportion to the wear [15–17].Figure7 shows that the interaction effects of the design factors on the wear of the carbon primary ring after 10 hours of friction test  are influenced by the level change of the other factors (not parallel segments). The most significant interactions are the interactions between primary ring variant/surrounding, normal load/surrounding, normal load/mating ring finishing, and surrounding/rotational frequency.Figure 7
Interaction effects on the wear(R2).For the carbon 1, the wear after 10 hours of friction test is weakly influenced by the normal load, the surrounding, the mating ring finishing, and the rotational frequency. On the other hand, with carbon 2, this wear is strongly influenced by the level change of the other factors. The lower hardness of carbon 2 compared to carbon 1 can explain these results.For a normal load of 1 daN, the wear is not influenced by the level change of the other factors. On the other hand, for a normal load of 5 daN, the wear is strongly influenced by their level change. There is an increasing effect of the temperature with the normal contact load. An increase in the frictional pressure is mainly related to an increase in the temperature of the waterproof interface and thus the effects are manifested as wear. The increase in temperature often causes a decrease in the resistance and in the hardness. It can also induce the evaporation of the lubricating film in the waterproof interface. In dry friction test, the wear of different materials from ceramic to carbon rapidly adopts significant values with increasing temperature. In dry or in lubricated friction test, this increase in temperature induces a risk of creating cracks, which in turn increase the wear [18]. This can result from mechanical or thermal overloads, from a dry running or a lower cooling, from variations of pressure, from high speeds or alterations of the conditions of the interface.The graph of the interaction between the surrounding and the rotational frequency (Figure7) shows that in a lubricated surrounding, the wear is more important with the smallest rotational frequency, which is 50 rad/s. But, according to Archard [19], an increase in wear is proportional to an increase in the frictional speed. This is true, provided that no additional hydrodynamic effect is produced. According to the measurements made by Paxton and Shobert [7] and by Wisander and Johnson [20], the wear can present a tendency towards being stationary or descending as a function of speed. This phenomenon depends strongly upon the couple of materials and the lubricating fluid.


## 3.3. Study of the Temperature

The temperature maximal(R3) obtained during the friction test, five millimeters under the friction surface of the primary ring, is measured (Table 2). From the average effects graphs of the five studied factors (Figure 8), it is shown that the normal load, the surrounding and the rotational strongly frequency influence this temperature. The transitions from 5 daN to 1 daN for the normal load, from dry to lubricated surrounding, and from 400 rad/s to 50 rad/s for the rotational frequency induce a significant decrease of this temperature. On the other hand, the primary ring variant and the mating ring finishing do not influence it significantly. It is interesting to note that different thermal conductivity coefficient, the temperature maximal measured, under the same parametric conditions, is equivalent with the carbon 1 and the carbon 2 primary ring material.Figure 8
Influence of the studied factors on the temperature maximal measured during the friction test, five millimeters under the friction surface of the primary ring(R3).The increase in temperature of the dynamic sealing element induces a risk of thermal cracks. And so, it reduces its service life. Control of thermal cracking is of a great importance to ensure a desired service life time and function of the studied dynamic sealing element. In the present study, primary ring cracks have been experimentally reproduced (Figure9).(a) surface of the primary ring crack; (b) crack by thermal dilatation. Parametric conditions of the friction test : carbon 1 (primary ring variant), 5 daN  (normal load), dry (surrounding), 3μm (mating ring finishing), 400 rad/s (rotational frequency). Temperature maximal measured during the test: 473°C.
(a)(b)Factors affecting the initiation of thermal cracks as well as the wear of the carbon primary ring can result from mechanical or thermal overloads, from dry running or a lower cooling, from variations of pressure, from high speeds, or alteration of the interface. It can be noticed that no thermal crack has been observed in lubricated regime.


## 3.4. Modelling and Analysis of the Variance

The prediction of the coefficient of dynamic friction and the wear models for the studied carbon-silicon carbide tribological couple were developed based on the following matrix model:(7)M=Ravg+[+EA1-EA2][A]+⋯+t[A][+EA1B1-EA1B2-EA2B1+EA2B2][B]+⋯+RES
with   M: calculated response, Ravg: general average of the response R, [A]:  Vector “level indicator’’ of the factor A, [A]=[10] for A at level 1 or [01] at level 2,  t[A]: Vector transposed of vector [A], and Res: Residual term.The matrix models of the coefficient of dynamic friction and the wear after 10 hours of friction test are established by taking into account the five studied factors, as well as the ten interactions between these factors. The two matrix models(M1,M2) allow determining the best combination among 32 possible to minimize the coefficient of dynamic friction (R1) and the wear (R2). From the matrix model M1, the combination of factors minimizing the coefficient of dynamic friction after 10 hours of friction test is(i)
primary ring material(F1):  carbon 2,(ii)
normal load(F2): 5 daN,(iii)
surrounding(F3):  lubricated,(iv)
mating ring finishing(F4): 3 μm glazing,(v)
rotational frequency(F5):  50 rad/s,the combination of factors minimizing the wear after 10 hours of friction test is, according to the matrix modelM2,(i)
primary ring material(F1):  carbon 1 or carbon 2,(ii)
normal load(F2):  1 daN,(iii)
surrounding(F3):  lubricated,(iv)
mating ring finishing(F4):  3 μm glazing,(v)
rotational frequency(F5):  400 rad/s.The influence of carbon material on the wear is not significant.Indeed, with a normal load of 1 daN, in a lubricated environment, with a 3μm glazing mating ring finishing and a rotational frequency of 400 rad/s, the use of carbon 1 or carbon 2 mating ring changes the wear rate less than 0.3%.(8)M1=0.431+[+0.011-0.011][F1]+[-0.008+0.008][F2]+[+0.03-0.03][F3]+[-0.013+0.013][F4]+[-0.014+0.014][F5]+t[F1][-0.009+0.009+0.009-0.009][F2]+t[F1][+0.037-0.037-0.037+0.037][F3]+t[F1][+0.067-0.067-0.067+0.067][F4]+t[F1][+0.048-0.048-0.048+0.048][F5]+t[F2][-0.073+0.073+0.073-0.073][F3]+t[F2][+0.006-0.006-0.006+0.006][F4]+t[F2][+0.037-0.037-0.037+0.037][F5]+t[F3][+0.051-0.051-0.051+0.051][F4]+t[F3][+0.067-0.067-0.067+0.067][F5]+t[F4][+0.015-0.015-0.015+0.015][F5]+RES,M2=32.062+[-13.262+13.262][F1]+[-25.312+25.312][F2]+[+20.313-20.313][F3]+[-19.687+19.687][F4]+[-15.687+15.687][F5]+t[F1][+11.762-11.762-11.762+11.762][F2]+t[F1][-18.613+18.613+18.613-18.613][F3]+t[F1][+12.137-12.137-12.137+12.137][F4]+t[F1][+4.887-4.887-4.887+4.887][F5]+t[F2][-18.263+18.263+18.263-18.263][F3]+t[F2][+20.437-20.437-20.437+20.437][F4]+t[F2][+11.687-11.687-11.687+11.687][F5]+t[F3][-11.688+11.688+11.688-11.688][F4]+t[F3][-23.688+23.688+23.688-23.688][F5]+t[F4][+10.562-10.562-10.562+10.562][F5]+RES
with  M1: calculated coefficient of dynamic friction,  M2: calculated wear, [Fx]: Vector “level indicator’’ of the factor Fx, t[Fx]: Vector transposed of vector [Fx], and Res: Residual term.An analysis of the variance allows determining the percentage of contribution of every factor and interaction on the coefficient of dynamic friction and on the wear after 10 hours of friction test. These percentages of contribution of the five studied factors and of their interactions are shown in Table3.Table 3
Percentage of contribution of every factor and interaction on the coefficient of  dynamic friction(R1) and on the wear (R2) after 10 hours of friction test.
FactorsR1R2primary ring variant0.49%3.72%normal load0.26%13.57%surrounding3.68%8.74%mating ring finishing0.69%8.21%rotational frequency0.8%5.21%Interactionsprimary ring variant/normal load0.39%2.93%primary ring variant/surrounding5.63%7.34%primary ring variant/mating ring finishing18.43%3.12%primary ring variant/rotational frequency9.47%0.5%normal load/surrounding22.33%7.06%normal load/mating ring finishing0.15%8.85%normal load/rotational frequency5.63%2.89%surrounding/mating ring finishing10.69%2.89%surrounding/rotational frequency18.43%11.88%mating ring finishing/rotational frequency0.93%2.36%The percentages of contribution on the coefficient of dynamic friction reveal that the influence of the five studied factors is weak. On the other hand, these factors acting in interaction with another factor have a significant influence on the coefficient of dynamic friction after 10 hours of friction test. This analysis of the variance confirms that the most significant interactions are the interactions between primary ring material/mating ring finishing, normal load/surrounding, and surrounding/rotational frequency.Table3 shows that three factors and four interactions have a significant influence on the wear, with a percentage of contribution superior to 7%.


## 4. Conclusion

The use of a couple of different materials is one engineering technique used in the tribological process of critical components as dynamic sealing element of water pump of automotives combustion engines. Due to the number of variables affecting the service life of the components, surfaces friction is a complex process in itself. In order to investigate the influence of majors factors on the coefficient of dynamic friction and the wear of carbon-silicon carbide tribological couples, the Taguchi method was applied.The knowledge obtained in the present study allows to optimize a new couple of materials for dynamic sealing applications. This study investigated the effects of five factors and their interactions (level 2) on the coefficient of dynamic friction and the wear of carbon-silicon carbide couples, to determine the optimal conditions and the best friction couple to use for dynamic sealing applications. Regarding the coefficient of dynamic friction, factors such as the variant of the primary ring, the mating ring finishing, the speed, and the normal load have little influence. On the other hand, a significant decrease in the coefficient is observed in a lubricated surrounding. Also, the interactions between primary ring material/mating ring finishing, normal load/surrounding, and surrounding/rotational frequency influence strongly the coefficient of dynamic friction. Concerning the wear of the carbon primary ring, the five studied factors and the interactions between primary ring variant/surrounding, normal load/surrounding, normal load/mating ring finishing, and surrounding/rotational frequency have a significant influence. Two matrix models allowed determining the combination of factors minimizing the coefficient of dynamic friction and the wear of the studied tribological couple. With these last ones not being minimal in the same conditions, the choice of these factors results from a compromise dependent on the use.For the studied dynamic sealing element, lubricant is used to separate the carbon primary ring from the porous silicon carbide mating ring. As a result, one can increase the capacity for specific load and reduce wear. The lubricant and air make up the surroundings of functioning of the studied system. It could be interesting to consider the influence of exterior elements such as the dust and the grease. Indeed, in interaction with the environment of functioning, these last ones can influence the wear behavior of the tribological system. These interactions can have very different forms: air/coolant, tribo-oxidation/lubrication, abrasion/mating ring-primary ring, chemical reaction/mating ring-primary ring, and so forth.



---

*Source: 830476-2010-04-19.xml*