# Stability Study of Darunavir Ethanolate Tablets Applying a New Stability-Indicating HPLC Method

Authors: Josilene Chaves Ruela Corrêa; Cristina Helena dos Reis Serra; Hérida Regina Nunes Salgado
Journal: Chromatography Research International
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

Chemical and physical degradation of drugs may result in altered therapeutic efficacy and even toxic effects. Therefore, the aim of this work was to study the stability of darunavir and to develop and validate a liquid chromatography (LC) method to determine darunavir in raw material and tablets in the presence of degradation products. The novel method showed to be linear from 6.0 to 21.0μg/mL, with high precision (CV < 2%) and accuracy (recuperation of 99.64%). It is simple and reliable, free of placebo interferences. The robustness of the method was evaluated by a factorial design using seven different parameters. Forced degradation study was done under alkaline, acidic, and oxidative stress at ambient temperature and by heating. The LC method was able to quantify and separate darunavir and its degradation products. Darunavir showed to be unstable under alkaline, acid, and oxidative conditions. The novelty of this study is understanding the factors that affect darunavir ethanolate stability in tablets, which is the first step to unravel the path to know the degradation products. The novel stability-indicating method can be used to monitor the drug and the main degradation products in low concentrations in which there is linearity.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

According to the World Health Organization (WHO) AIDS epidemic updates, in 2009 new HIV infections were reduced by 17% over the previous eight years. Data from WHO also show that there are more people living with HIV than ever before as people are living longer due to the beneficial effects of antiretroviral therapy along with population growth [1]. WHO estimates that since the availability of effective treatment in 1996, some 2.9 million lives have been saved [1]. In accordance with Sharma and Garg, the current clinical therapeutic practice of using Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART), is considered as one of the most significant advances in the field of HIV therapy [2].As an important component of the HAART, darunavir (Figure1), a synthetic nonpeptidic protease inhibitor developed by the pharmaceutical company Tibotec in 1998 [3], has demonstrated high efficacy against HIV [4, 5]. This compound was licensed in June 2006 in the United States and in February 2007 in the European Union [1]. The daily dose of darunavir (600 mg twice a day) has to be administered along with low dose (100 mg) of ritonavir as a booster and food [6] which contributes to better solubilization of the drug in the lumen [6].Figure 1
Chemical structure of darunavir.Darunavir is marketed in ethanolate form under the brand name of Prezista, and it is available in different dose strengths such as 75, 150, 300, 400, and 600 mg. In addition, Prezista is available as an oral suspension in which the darunavir dose is 100 mg/mL. The dosage form used in this study was Prezista 300 mg darunavir tablets. This dosage has the following composition: 325.24 mg of darunavir ethanolate and the inactive ingredients (crospovidone, magnesium stearate, Opadry II White (partially hydrolyzed polyvinyl alcohol, titanium dioxide, macrogol, and talc), and Prosolv (microcrystalline cellulose and colloidal silicon dioxide)).As HIV is a global disease, darunavir is used throughout the world and thus stored under different environmental conditions. Because of this, it is extremely important to study the stability of darunavir keeping in mind that pharmaceuticals are especially sensitive to environmental factors.Stability can be defined as the capacity of a drug substance or product to remain within established specifications and to maintain its identity, strength, quality, and purity throughout expiration dating period [7]. Stability test of an active pharmaceutical ingredient or drug product can provide evidence on the drug quality and if it can be influenced by a variety of environmental factors such as temperature and humidity [7]. Chemical and physical degradation of drugs may result in altered therapeutic efficacy and even toxic effects. Therefore, understanding the factors that change the stability of pharmaceuticals and identifying ways to guarantee their stability are important [7]. In recent years, the investigation about the influence of light on the stability of drugs has gained more and more importance. Information about photo stability of drugs can help to determine the storage conditions in order to ensure the safety and quality of pharmaceutical products [8].There are some studies reported for determination of darunavir in biological samples using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet detector or mass spectrometer [9–14] and two recent reported studies for determination of darunavir in tablets and darunavir raw material in a stress test [15, 16]. It was not possible to see how resolved are the degradation products peaks that emerged during stress test and the peak for the drug in the published stress test. Moreover, buffer was applied as mobile phase which does not contribute to a longer life of chromatographic column. There is no monograph for darunavir raw material or product in any pharmacopeia or official compendium.The aim of this work was to study the stability of darunavir raw material and tablets and to develop and validate a HPLC method to determine darunavir ethanolate raw material and tablets in the presence of degradation products. The novelty of this study is in understanding the factors that affect darunavir ethanolate stability in tablets, which is the first step to unravel the path of instability and know each degradation product. To evaluate all samples in this study, we have developed an accurate, simple and reliable stability-indicating HPLC method free of placebo interferences. The stability-indicating method was able to resolve the degradation product peaks and the peak of the drug, wherefore, it can be applied during degradation product monitoring studies.


## 2. Material and Methods

### 2.1. Chemicals

Darunavir chemical reference (assigned purity of 98%) was obtained from Sequoia Research (Pangbourne, United Kingdom). Darunavir ethanolate tablets 300 mg (Prezista) were purchased from local markers. The raw material was extracted from Prezista tablets by ethanol extraction using an adaptation of the method described by Berginc and coworkers [17]. The purity of extracted darunavir was confirmed by HPLC and by infrared spectroscopy analysis. The HPLC method used to confirm the purity and to standardize the raw material against the chemical reference was that described by Goldwirt and coworkers [14], whereupon the darunavir peak surface represented 96.6% of the total chromatogram surface area and it contains 94% of darunavir when analyzed against darunavir chemical reference. Darunavir raw material (extracted from tablets) and darunavir chemical reference were evaluated by infrared spectroscopy and they showed the same spectrum. The ethanolic extraction was applied because the placebo ingredients have poor solubility in ethanol, and the drug is soluble in this solvent. Furthermore to ensure the purity of the extracted raw material it was analyzed by HPLC method using the Goldwirt and coworkers method. The amount of mass remainder from the extraction of the darunavir from Prezista which was free of the active pharmaceutical ingredient was used as placebo.Acetonitrile LC grade was purchased from JTBaker (Center Valley, USA) and Tedia (Fairfield, USA). Ultrapurified water (< 18 < mu >S) was prepared in-house by using Direct-QR water system (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, USA). Prior to use, mobile phase solvents were degassed in an ultrasonic bath for 30 min. Sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid, and hydrogen peroxide (reagent grade) were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Purified water was used to prepare the mobile phase, and the sample and the standard solutions were filtered through a 0.45 μm membrane filter.


### 2.2. Apparatus

Liquid chromatography apparatus (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA), equipped with a Waters 1525 binary pump, a Rheodyne Breeze 7725i manual injector, and a Waters 2487 UV-VIS wavelength detector, was used. In addition, a liquid chromatography apparatus Shimadzu R CLASS-VP, with PDA detector (Shimadzu Corporate, Japan), was employed. HPLC analysis was conducted by using a RP C18 column (Symmetry, 5μm, 250×4.6 mm, Waters). An infrared spectrometer equipment with Fourrier transformation (FTIR-Irprestige 21, Shimadzu Corporate, Japan) was used to analyze the raw material.


### 2.3. LC Conditions

Chromatographic analysis was performed in isocratic mode. Mobile phase consists of acetonitrile water (50 : 50, v/v) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The injection volume was 20μL and the detection wavelength was 267 nm. Total run time was 9 min. All experiments were performed at room temperature (25°C), and the total area of peak was used to quantify darunavir.


### 2.4. Standard and Sample Solutions Preparation

A stock standard solution of darunavir was prepared by dissolving 3.0 mg of the raw material in 100 mL volumetric flask. To prepare the stock sample solution, twenty tablets were accurately weighed, finely pulverized and mixed using a mortar and pestle. An amount of tablet powder equivalent to 3.0 mg of darunavir was weighed and transferred into a 100 mL volumetric flask. The drug was dissolved in 20 mL of methanol and 50 mL of water. It was sonicated for 10 min, and then the volume was making up with water. Working solutions were prepared in triplicate by diluting the stock standard solution with water to reach six final concentrations: 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 21μg/mL. The concentration used to assess the darunavir content is 15 μg/mL. Placebo solution was prepared at the same form.


### 2.5. Forced Degradation Studies/Specificity

#### 2.5.1. Acid, Alkali, Neutral, Oxidative, and Photo Degradation Studies

The procedure of degradation studies was conducted in agreement with ICH guide to stability studies [18]. Sample solutions were prepared at concentration of 15 μg/mL in water, 0.1 M HCl, 0.1 M NaOH, and H2O2 3%; they were stored at room temperature for 30 minutes, and they were stored for 3, 6, and 12 h at 90°C in bath. After that, aliquots of these solutions were removed and evaluated by LC method. In addition, sample solutions were prepared in water with 20% of methanol and using the same concentration (15 μg/mL). These preparations were exposed to UVC radiation (254 nm) for 1 h. The stress degradation was carried out exposing the solutions in flasks. Control samples protected from light with aluminum foil were also placed in exposition concurrently in the light chamber. After that, aliquots of these solutions were removed and evaluated by LC method.


#### 2.5.2. Specificity

The specificity of the method was determined by darunavir standard, raw material, tablets, and its placebo and by subjecting a sample solution to accelerated degradation by acid, basic, neutral, and oxidative conditions to evaluate the interference in the quantitation of darunavir. The method was validated in agreement with ICH guide to validation of methods [19].


### 2.6. Linearity and Precision

The calibration curve was obtained at six concentration levels: 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 21μg/mL using working standard solutions. The linearity was evaluated by the least square regression method with triplicate determinations at each concentration level. The validity of the assay was verified by means of ANOVA.The precision of the method was determined by repeatability (intraday) and intermediate precision (interday). For repeatability test, three curves were constructed with the established six concentration levels using standard solutions in the same day; for intermediate precision, three curves were constructed with four concentration levels (6, 12, 15, and 21μg/mL) using standard solutions in a different day. An interval of two days between repeatability and intermediate precision tests was observed. The results were expressed as percentage of relative standard deviation (RSD).


### 2.7. Accuracy

The accuracy of the method was assessed by recovery method. The recovery was determined by adding known amounts of darunavir raw material to placebo at the beginning of the process to obtain the six established concentration levels, in triplicate.


### 2.8. Detection and Quantitation Limits

The detection and quantitation were determined using calibration standards and they were calculated as 3 and 10σ/S, respectively, where S is the slope of the calibration curve and σ is the standard deviation of y-intercept of regression equation.


### 2.9. Robustness

Robustness was evaluated by Youden and Steiner method [20]. By this method seven different parameters could be evaluated by eight analytical runs employing factorial combination.


## 2.1. Chemicals

Darunavir chemical reference (assigned purity of 98%) was obtained from Sequoia Research (Pangbourne, United Kingdom). Darunavir ethanolate tablets 300 mg (Prezista) were purchased from local markers. The raw material was extracted from Prezista tablets by ethanol extraction using an adaptation of the method described by Berginc and coworkers [17]. The purity of extracted darunavir was confirmed by HPLC and by infrared spectroscopy analysis. The HPLC method used to confirm the purity and to standardize the raw material against the chemical reference was that described by Goldwirt and coworkers [14], whereupon the darunavir peak surface represented 96.6% of the total chromatogram surface area and it contains 94% of darunavir when analyzed against darunavir chemical reference. Darunavir raw material (extracted from tablets) and darunavir chemical reference were evaluated by infrared spectroscopy and they showed the same spectrum. The ethanolic extraction was applied because the placebo ingredients have poor solubility in ethanol, and the drug is soluble in this solvent. Furthermore to ensure the purity of the extracted raw material it was analyzed by HPLC method using the Goldwirt and coworkers method. The amount of mass remainder from the extraction of the darunavir from Prezista which was free of the active pharmaceutical ingredient was used as placebo.Acetonitrile LC grade was purchased from JTBaker (Center Valley, USA) and Tedia (Fairfield, USA). Ultrapurified water (< 18 < mu >S) was prepared in-house by using Direct-QR water system (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, USA). Prior to use, mobile phase solvents were degassed in an ultrasonic bath for 30 min. Sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid, and hydrogen peroxide (reagent grade) were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Purified water was used to prepare the mobile phase, and the sample and the standard solutions were filtered through a 0.45 μm membrane filter.


## 2.2. Apparatus

Liquid chromatography apparatus (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA), equipped with a Waters 1525 binary pump, a Rheodyne Breeze 7725i manual injector, and a Waters 2487 UV-VIS wavelength detector, was used. In addition, a liquid chromatography apparatus Shimadzu R CLASS-VP, with PDA detector (Shimadzu Corporate, Japan), was employed. HPLC analysis was conducted by using a RP C18 column (Symmetry, 5μm, 250×4.6 mm, Waters). An infrared spectrometer equipment with Fourrier transformation (FTIR-Irprestige 21, Shimadzu Corporate, Japan) was used to analyze the raw material.


## 2.3. LC Conditions

Chromatographic analysis was performed in isocratic mode. Mobile phase consists of acetonitrile water (50 : 50, v/v) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The injection volume was 20μL and the detection wavelength was 267 nm. Total run time was 9 min. All experiments were performed at room temperature (25°C), and the total area of peak was used to quantify darunavir.


## 2.4. Standard and Sample Solutions Preparation

A stock standard solution of darunavir was prepared by dissolving 3.0 mg of the raw material in 100 mL volumetric flask. To prepare the stock sample solution, twenty tablets were accurately weighed, finely pulverized and mixed using a mortar and pestle. An amount of tablet powder equivalent to 3.0 mg of darunavir was weighed and transferred into a 100 mL volumetric flask. The drug was dissolved in 20 mL of methanol and 50 mL of water. It was sonicated for 10 min, and then the volume was making up with water. Working solutions were prepared in triplicate by diluting the stock standard solution with water to reach six final concentrations: 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 21μg/mL. The concentration used to assess the darunavir content is 15 μg/mL. Placebo solution was prepared at the same form.


## 2.5. Forced Degradation Studies/Specificity

### 2.5.1. Acid, Alkali, Neutral, Oxidative, and Photo Degradation Studies

The procedure of degradation studies was conducted in agreement with ICH guide to stability studies [18]. Sample solutions were prepared at concentration of 15 μg/mL in water, 0.1 M HCl, 0.1 M NaOH, and H2O2 3%; they were stored at room temperature for 30 minutes, and they were stored for 3, 6, and 12 h at 90°C in bath. After that, aliquots of these solutions were removed and evaluated by LC method. In addition, sample solutions were prepared in water with 20% of methanol and using the same concentration (15 μg/mL). These preparations were exposed to UVC radiation (254 nm) for 1 h. The stress degradation was carried out exposing the solutions in flasks. Control samples protected from light with aluminum foil were also placed in exposition concurrently in the light chamber. After that, aliquots of these solutions were removed and evaluated by LC method.


### 2.5.2. Specificity

The specificity of the method was determined by darunavir standard, raw material, tablets, and its placebo and by subjecting a sample solution to accelerated degradation by acid, basic, neutral, and oxidative conditions to evaluate the interference in the quantitation of darunavir. The method was validated in agreement with ICH guide to validation of methods [19].


## 2.5.1. Acid, Alkali, Neutral, Oxidative, and Photo Degradation Studies

The procedure of degradation studies was conducted in agreement with ICH guide to stability studies [18]. Sample solutions were prepared at concentration of 15 μg/mL in water, 0.1 M HCl, 0.1 M NaOH, and H2O2 3%; they were stored at room temperature for 30 minutes, and they were stored for 3, 6, and 12 h at 90°C in bath. After that, aliquots of these solutions were removed and evaluated by LC method. In addition, sample solutions were prepared in water with 20% of methanol and using the same concentration (15 μg/mL). These preparations were exposed to UVC radiation (254 nm) for 1 h. The stress degradation was carried out exposing the solutions in flasks. Control samples protected from light with aluminum foil were also placed in exposition concurrently in the light chamber. After that, aliquots of these solutions were removed and evaluated by LC method.


## 2.5.2. Specificity

The specificity of the method was determined by darunavir standard, raw material, tablets, and its placebo and by subjecting a sample solution to accelerated degradation by acid, basic, neutral, and oxidative conditions to evaluate the interference in the quantitation of darunavir. The method was validated in agreement with ICH guide to validation of methods [19].


## 2.6. Linearity and Precision

The calibration curve was obtained at six concentration levels: 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 21μg/mL using working standard solutions. The linearity was evaluated by the least square regression method with triplicate determinations at each concentration level. The validity of the assay was verified by means of ANOVA.The precision of the method was determined by repeatability (intraday) and intermediate precision (interday). For repeatability test, three curves were constructed with the established six concentration levels using standard solutions in the same day; for intermediate precision, three curves were constructed with four concentration levels (6, 12, 15, and 21μg/mL) using standard solutions in a different day. An interval of two days between repeatability and intermediate precision tests was observed. The results were expressed as percentage of relative standard deviation (RSD).


## 2.7. Accuracy

The accuracy of the method was assessed by recovery method. The recovery was determined by adding known amounts of darunavir raw material to placebo at the beginning of the process to obtain the six established concentration levels, in triplicate.


## 2.8. Detection and Quantitation Limits

The detection and quantitation were determined using calibration standards and they were calculated as 3 and 10σ/S, respectively, where S is the slope of the calibration curve and σ is the standard deviation of y-intercept of regression equation.


## 2.9. Robustness

Robustness was evaluated by Youden and Steiner method [20]. By this method seven different parameters could be evaluated by eight analytical runs employing factorial combination.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Analytical Development

Good separation and symmetry of darunavir peak were obtained by using Symmetry column and mix of acetonitrile and water (50 : 50, v/v) as mobile phase. The LC method validated is fast, with retention time equal to 7.4 min. The chromatograms of darunavir standard, raw material, tablets, and its placebo are shown in Figure2.Figure 2
Overlay chromatograms for darunavir standard, raw material, tablets and its placebo at 15 g/mL (room temperature = 20°C).The darunavir raw material used in this work was extracted from Prezista tablets by ethanol extraction. Its purity was tested by HPLC and by infrared spectroscopy. The infrared spectrum of darunavir standard and raw material are shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Overlay infrared spectrum of darunavir standard and extracted raw material.The most important chromatographic parameters monitored during the validation of the developed method are shown in Table1. The results from this monitoring can be compared with the acceptance criteria widely used in liquid chromatography.Table 1
Chromatographic parameters and the acceptance criteria for darunavir determination by developed LC method.
Chromatographic parameters
Results
Acceptance criteria
t
R (retention time, min)
7.4
—
T
0 (column dead time, min)
1.2
—
k
′ (retention factor)
5.16
2 <k′ < 10
N (column efficiency)
2433
N > 2000


### 3.2. Stability Study

The validated LC method was applied as an indicating stability method. It was able to separate the possible degradation products (Figure4). The stress conditions tested were aqueous, alkaline (0.1 M NaOH), acid (0.1 M HCl), oxidative medium (3% v/v H2O2), and light (254 nm) at ambient temperature and under heating (90°C). Darunavir showed to be stable under UVC light and aqueous medium, but unstable under alkaline, acid, and oxidative conditions. In these conditions, some degradation products emerged. In the presence of alkaline and oxidative media darunavir was almost completely consumed over time. Figure 4 shows the chromatograms obtained from alkaline, acid, and oxidative stress where the main degradation product peaks were marked between the peaks from the blanks and the drug.Overlay chromatograms obtained from alkaline (a), acid (b), and oxidative (c) stress darunavir tablets, its placebo, and the blank of the media heated for 6 hours. The possible degradation products are shown, and they were highlighted with numbers.
(a)
(b)
(c)The stability-indicating method was able to separate completely the peaks related to degradation products and the drug and solve the main degradation product peaks wherefore, it can be applied not just to monitor the drug but to monitor the degradation products during stability studies as well.Darunavir has a carbamate function in its structure. As it is known and discussed for Larson and Weber [21] and for Dittert and Higuchi [22], the carbamate can be easily hydrolyzed mainly in basic media.In basic stress, probably, the carbamate function suffered hydrolysis, and this reaction is accelerated by the heating, as expected, because after 12 hours under heating the darunavir peak had disappeared and a degradation product peak had risen (Figure4). In acid and oxidative medium, some probable degradation products emerged and all of them are more polar than darunavir molecule since their peaks showed minor retention times in comparison with darunavir peak. The chemical structure of darunavir (Figure 1) has some sites where some reactions as hydroxylation may occur. All of these degradation products are under investigation in our lab.Figures3 and 4 show a small variation in retention time of the drug in the chromatograms. It occurs because of room temperature variation since the HPLC do not have column oven. However, this variation does not affect the analytical assay as shown by the robustness test.


### 3.3. Validation of the Method

The method was applied for the quality control of darunavir raw material and tablets and to quantify the drug in a stability stress test. The samples were analyzed using a PDA detector which shows no coelution in darunavir peak.The validity of the method was verified by means of the ANOVA. According to ANOVA, there is a statistically significant linear regression in the tested concentration range from 6 to 21μg/mL (Fcalculated >/Fcritical; P=0.05). The equation of the curve is y=43272.84X+6875.41, and the coefficient of correlation is 0.997. The concentration levels applied in linearity test are considerately low which is very important for the study of stress as it enables detection of degradation products under these conditions.The precision of the method was determined by repeatability (intraday) and intermediate precision (interday) and was expressed as RSD (%) of a series of measurement. The result obtained shows RSD mean 1.75%, indicating very good intra-day precision. Interday variability was calculated from assays on 3 days and shows a mean RSD of 3.28% (Table2). The accuracy of the method was determined by the mean recovery. The mean percentage recovery was 99.64% (Tables 2 and 3) indicating a very good agreement between the true value and the value found.Table 2
Validation parameters for chromatographic method.
Parameters
Chromatographic method
Useful concentration, µg/mL
15
Analytical curve
43272.84X + 6875.41
Determination coefficient (r2)
0.997
RSD of repeatabilitya (%, n = 18)
1.75
RSD intermediate precision (%,n = 12)
3.28
Accuracy (%)
99.64
RSD of accuracya (%, n = 18)
1.36
Detection limitb, µg/mL
0.87
Quantitation limitc, µg/mL
2.89
aMeasured at the six concentration levels;b3 σ/S; c10 σ/S.Table 3
Recovery data of standard solutions added to the placebo analyzed by the proposed chromatographic method.
Method
Added amount (μg/mL)
Recoverya (%) ± RSD
Chromatographic method
6.0
101.5 ± 0.5
9.0
99.9 ± 1.0
12.0
98.5 ± 0.6
15.0
98.8 ± 1.2
18.0
98.9 ± 0.7
21.0
98.9 ± 1.0
aMean of three replicates.Robustness testing is useful in order to prove that typical variations to the method are negligible in the procedure outcome, being usually studied by deliberately changing critical parameters and monitoring possible alterations. A method is said to be robust when these alterations produce no significant changes in its results. The robustness test by Youden and Steiner method [20] can evaluate the interference of low and deliberated changes in seven parameters on the darunavir content. The parameters evaluated were chromatographic column (A/a), wavelength (B/b), flow rate (C/c), mobile phase (D/d), sonication time (E/e), room temperature (F/f), and acetonitrile brand (G/g). Table 4 shows the factorial combination of analytical parameters evaluated, and Table 5 shows the analytical parameters and variations. The analytical parameters were varied relative to standard conditions.Table 4
Factorial combination of Youden and Steiner [20] test.
Parameter
Factorial combination
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
A, a
A
A
A
A
a
a
a
a
B, b
B
B
b
b
B
B
B
b
C, c
C
c
C
c
C
C
C
c
D, d
D
D
d
d
D
D
D
D
E, e
E
e
E
e
E
E
E
E
F, f
F
f
f
F
F
F
F
F
G, g
G
g
g
G
G
G
G
g
Results
S
t
u
v
x
y
W
zTable 5
Analytical parameters and their variations.
Parameters
Variations
A
Chromatographic column
A: Waters Symmetrya
a: Agilenta
B
Wavelength
B: 267 nm
b: 268 nm
b′: 266 nm
C
Flow rate
C: 1.0 mL/min
c: 1.1 mL/min
c′: 0.9 mL/min
D
Mobile phase
D: 50 : 50b
d: 55 : 45b
d′: 45 : 55b
E
Sonication time
E: 10 min
e: 11 min
e′: 9 min
F
Room temperature
F: 25°C
f: 20°C
G
Acetonitrile brand
G: JTBaker
g: Tedia
aC18, 250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm; bacetonitrile : water.To evaluate the effect of each variation on the darunavir assay, the following equation was used [23]:
(1)A,a=x+y+w+z4-s+t+u+v4(equationtoparameterA,a).The major effect on the darunavir content was shown when the parameter sonication time was modified. The values obtained by the above equation were E, e (1.26%) and E, e′ (1.50%). Therefore, sonication time should be obeyed rigorously. The results to other parameters variation show values considerably low and not significant in routine analyses.


## 3.1. Analytical Development

Good separation and symmetry of darunavir peak were obtained by using Symmetry column and mix of acetonitrile and water (50 : 50, v/v) as mobile phase. The LC method validated is fast, with retention time equal to 7.4 min. The chromatograms of darunavir standard, raw material, tablets, and its placebo are shown in Figure2.Figure 2
Overlay chromatograms for darunavir standard, raw material, tablets and its placebo at 15 g/mL (room temperature = 20°C).The darunavir raw material used in this work was extracted from Prezista tablets by ethanol extraction. Its purity was tested by HPLC and by infrared spectroscopy. The infrared spectrum of darunavir standard and raw material are shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Overlay infrared spectrum of darunavir standard and extracted raw material.The most important chromatographic parameters monitored during the validation of the developed method are shown in Table1. The results from this monitoring can be compared with the acceptance criteria widely used in liquid chromatography.Table 1
Chromatographic parameters and the acceptance criteria for darunavir determination by developed LC method.
Chromatographic parameters
Results
Acceptance criteria
t
R (retention time, min)
7.4
—
T
0 (column dead time, min)
1.2
—
k
′ (retention factor)
5.16
2 <k′ < 10
N (column efficiency)
2433
N > 2000


## 3.2. Stability Study

The validated LC method was applied as an indicating stability method. It was able to separate the possible degradation products (Figure4). The stress conditions tested were aqueous, alkaline (0.1 M NaOH), acid (0.1 M HCl), oxidative medium (3% v/v H2O2), and light (254 nm) at ambient temperature and under heating (90°C). Darunavir showed to be stable under UVC light and aqueous medium, but unstable under alkaline, acid, and oxidative conditions. In these conditions, some degradation products emerged. In the presence of alkaline and oxidative media darunavir was almost completely consumed over time. Figure 4 shows the chromatograms obtained from alkaline, acid, and oxidative stress where the main degradation product peaks were marked between the peaks from the blanks and the drug.Overlay chromatograms obtained from alkaline (a), acid (b), and oxidative (c) stress darunavir tablets, its placebo, and the blank of the media heated for 6 hours. The possible degradation products are shown, and they were highlighted with numbers.
(a)
(b)
(c)The stability-indicating method was able to separate completely the peaks related to degradation products and the drug and solve the main degradation product peaks wherefore, it can be applied not just to monitor the drug but to monitor the degradation products during stability studies as well.Darunavir has a carbamate function in its structure. As it is known and discussed for Larson and Weber [21] and for Dittert and Higuchi [22], the carbamate can be easily hydrolyzed mainly in basic media.In basic stress, probably, the carbamate function suffered hydrolysis, and this reaction is accelerated by the heating, as expected, because after 12 hours under heating the darunavir peak had disappeared and a degradation product peak had risen (Figure4). In acid and oxidative medium, some probable degradation products emerged and all of them are more polar than darunavir molecule since their peaks showed minor retention times in comparison with darunavir peak. The chemical structure of darunavir (Figure 1) has some sites where some reactions as hydroxylation may occur. All of these degradation products are under investigation in our lab.Figures3 and 4 show a small variation in retention time of the drug in the chromatograms. It occurs because of room temperature variation since the HPLC do not have column oven. However, this variation does not affect the analytical assay as shown by the robustness test.


## 3.3. Validation of the Method

The method was applied for the quality control of darunavir raw material and tablets and to quantify the drug in a stability stress test. The samples were analyzed using a PDA detector which shows no coelution in darunavir peak.The validity of the method was verified by means of the ANOVA. According to ANOVA, there is a statistically significant linear regression in the tested concentration range from 6 to 21μg/mL (Fcalculated >/Fcritical; P=0.05). The equation of the curve is y=43272.84X+6875.41, and the coefficient of correlation is 0.997. The concentration levels applied in linearity test are considerately low which is very important for the study of stress as it enables detection of degradation products under these conditions.The precision of the method was determined by repeatability (intraday) and intermediate precision (interday) and was expressed as RSD (%) of a series of measurement. The result obtained shows RSD mean 1.75%, indicating very good intra-day precision. Interday variability was calculated from assays on 3 days and shows a mean RSD of 3.28% (Table2). The accuracy of the method was determined by the mean recovery. The mean percentage recovery was 99.64% (Tables 2 and 3) indicating a very good agreement between the true value and the value found.Table 2
Validation parameters for chromatographic method.
Parameters
Chromatographic method
Useful concentration, µg/mL
15
Analytical curve
43272.84X + 6875.41
Determination coefficient (r2)
0.997
RSD of repeatabilitya (%, n = 18)
1.75
RSD intermediate precision (%,n = 12)
3.28
Accuracy (%)
99.64
RSD of accuracya (%, n = 18)
1.36
Detection limitb, µg/mL
0.87
Quantitation limitc, µg/mL
2.89
aMeasured at the six concentration levels;b3 σ/S; c10 σ/S.Table 3
Recovery data of standard solutions added to the placebo analyzed by the proposed chromatographic method.
Method
Added amount (μg/mL)
Recoverya (%) ± RSD
Chromatographic method
6.0
101.5 ± 0.5
9.0
99.9 ± 1.0
12.0
98.5 ± 0.6
15.0
98.8 ± 1.2
18.0
98.9 ± 0.7
21.0
98.9 ± 1.0
aMean of three replicates.Robustness testing is useful in order to prove that typical variations to the method are negligible in the procedure outcome, being usually studied by deliberately changing critical parameters and monitoring possible alterations. A method is said to be robust when these alterations produce no significant changes in its results. The robustness test by Youden and Steiner method [20] can evaluate the interference of low and deliberated changes in seven parameters on the darunavir content. The parameters evaluated were chromatographic column (A/a), wavelength (B/b), flow rate (C/c), mobile phase (D/d), sonication time (E/e), room temperature (F/f), and acetonitrile brand (G/g). Table 4 shows the factorial combination of analytical parameters evaluated, and Table 5 shows the analytical parameters and variations. The analytical parameters were varied relative to standard conditions.Table 4
Factorial combination of Youden and Steiner [20] test.
Parameter
Factorial combination
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
A, a
A
A
A
A
a
a
a
a
B, b
B
B
b
b
B
B
B
b
C, c
C
c
C
c
C
C
C
c
D, d
D
D
d
d
D
D
D
D
E, e
E
e
E
e
E
E
E
E
F, f
F
f
f
F
F
F
F
F
G, g
G
g
g
G
G
G
G
g
Results
S
t
u
v
x
y
W
zTable 5
Analytical parameters and their variations.
Parameters
Variations
A
Chromatographic column
A: Waters Symmetrya
a: Agilenta
B
Wavelength
B: 267 nm
b: 268 nm
b′: 266 nm
C
Flow rate
C: 1.0 mL/min
c: 1.1 mL/min
c′: 0.9 mL/min
D
Mobile phase
D: 50 : 50b
d: 55 : 45b
d′: 45 : 55b
E
Sonication time
E: 10 min
e: 11 min
e′: 9 min
F
Room temperature
F: 25°C
f: 20°C
G
Acetonitrile brand
G: JTBaker
g: Tedia
aC18, 250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm; bacetonitrile : water.To evaluate the effect of each variation on the darunavir assay, the following equation was used [23]:
(1)A,a=x+y+w+z4-s+t+u+v4(equationtoparameterA,a).The major effect on the darunavir content was shown when the parameter sonication time was modified. The values obtained by the above equation were E, e (1.26%) and E, e′ (1.50%). Therefore, sonication time should be obeyed rigorously. The results to other parameters variation show values considerably low and not significant in routine analyses.


## 4. Conclusion

The proposed method was used successfully to determine darunavir raw material and tablets even in presence of degradation products. The results of the validation studies show that the LC method is accurate; it has significant linearity and precision without any interference from the excipient. The stability tests results showed that darunavir is significantly instable. In acid, alkaline, and oxidative media under heating, new substances were produced. In basic media, probably, darunavir molecule has its carbamate completely hydrolyzed. The stability-indicating method was able to separate completely the peaks related to degradation products and the drug and solve the main degradation product peaks; wherefore, this stability-indicating method can be used to monitor the degradation products in low concentrations in which there is linearity. The degradation products formed under basic, acid and oxidative medium are now under investigation in order to unravel its molecule and the pathway of darunavir degradation.



---

*Source: 834173-2013-05-15.xml*