# The Electric Field Modulation by Hemisphere Damage Sites in Fused Silica Subsurface

Authors: Shaobo He; Liang Yang; Li Li; Xiao-Tao Zu
Journal: Advances in Condensed Matter Physics
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

The effect of defect density on the electric field modulation to incident laser is investigated in this work. Based on the actual defect distribution in fused silica subsurface, the three-dimension grid model of defect sites is constructed firstly. Then, the three-dimension finite-difference time-domain method is developed to solve the Maxwell equations. The electric field intensity in the vicinity of the defect sites located in front subsurface of fused silica is numerically calculated. The relationships between the maximal electric field intensity in fused silica and the geometry of the defect sites are given. The simulated results reveal that the modulation becomes more remarkable with the increase of defects density firstly and then decrease. Besides, the effect of the distribution mode of defects on modulation is discussed. Meanwhile, the possible physical mechanism is analyzed in detail.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Laser damage of optics could be seen as occurring in two distinct steps. The first one concerns the damage occurrence due to the first optic irradiation: the initiation step. Afterward, damage sites are likely to grow with successive new shots: the growth step [1–3]. Historically, the studies of laser damage have been focused on the first step, namely, the origin and nature of the initial damage site. The diagnosis of site and the nature of the precursors to the formation of the site are discussed mainly. Surely, such information is useful but must be taken in context when considering the design, construction, and operation of a major laser facility. As laser damage cannot be inhibited totally, any laser damage on an optic may increase in severity by beam obscuration, intensity modulation, and light scatter. Some methods have been proposed to inhibit the growth of that laser damage, such as exposure of the SiO2 surface damage site to pulses from a CO2 laser, operating at 10.6 nm wavelength and sputtering the SiO2 surface damage site by some ion beam [4–6]. However, the efficacy of the methods is inconclusive. Both treatment of CO2 laser and sputtering of ion beam can smooth the damage site surface but can seldom fill any larger site. By analyzing theoretically, once the damage site appears at the surface of fused silica, it may cause electric field enhancement of incident laser. The subject of this work is to address the intensity modulation of damage sites by computing the electric field intensity around the damage sites.As for the field enhancement caused by defects, there have been some reports. The intensity distribution of an initially plane light wave incident on planar and conical surface cracks is calculated numerically by Génin et al. using a wave propagation computer code [7]. Qiu and Wolfea calculated the electric field distribution around conical pits to determine the optimal mitigation geometry which will not generate secondary damage precursors [8]. Stolz discussed the impact of irradiation wavelength on light intensification of a deeply imbedded spherical inclusion at normal and oblique incidence [9]. However, few literatures pay attention to the role of damages sites density during modulation and the effect of damage sites distribution on the modulation. At the actual damage sites distribution at optics subsurface, damage sites usually crowd together. So we built a grids model of three defects to discuss the modulation to electric field at different damage sites density and the effect of damage sites distribution on the modulation.In the present work, the three-dimensional (3D) grid models of hemisphere damage sites are constructed firstly. Maxwell equations are solved by the 3D finite-difference time-domain method. Then the electric field intensity distribution in the vicinity of the damage sites in front subsurface of fused silica is numerically simulated. The relationships between the maximal electric field intensity in fused silica and the distribution of the damage sites are discussed. This work aims to provide the theoretical direction about the laser induced damage during inertial confined fusion (ICF).


## 2. Model and Method

After treatment of CO2 laser and sputtering of ion beam, the edge of damage site may melt and the bottom of damage site may be filled with fused silica. The most common shape of damage site is hemispherical. For simplicity, we assume each damage site is hemisphere and has the radius r [10]. We build a 3D grid model of the damage site. In the model, the surface of damage site can be described by the 3D equation
(1)(x-x0)2+(y-y0)2+(z-z0)2=r2,
where xoy plane is parallel to the fused silica surface. (x0,y0,z0) is the centre of the hemisphere site. The difference in grid size is δ=λ/12=29.25 nm.The electric field intensity distribution in the vicinity of the damage sites is calculated using the 3D finite-difference time-domain method (FDTD) by solving Maxwell’s equations [11, 12]. This method has been used to simulate numerous wave propagation and electromagnetic scattering problems encountered in photolithography [7]. During the numerical calculation, the perfectly matched layer (PML) boundary condition is adopted [12]. The relative dielectric constant εr of fused silica is 2.25. The 351 nm laser with an amplitude 1.0 V/m travels in the direction normal to the surface, namely, along the z-axis. TM wave is considered in this work. Other damage in the fused silica is ignored. It is assumed that the damage sites are on the rear surface and the damage sites are empty (εr=1.0). In simulation, the size of the damage sites is about 10 percent of the actual one due to the limitation of present computer internal storage.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Electric Field Modulations

First, the light intensity profiles of the damage sites are plotted using a gray scale at two different planes: (a) planey=70δ and (b) plane z=101δ (see Figure 2). The gray scale is adapted so as to facilitate the comparison between the light intensity modulated by the damage sites and the incident light intensity. In the simulations of Figure 2, the radiuses of the three damage sites are all 15δ. The centers of the three damage sites are in a given circle with the radius R. All the calculations are performed for normal-incidence illumination. Figure 2(a) refers to the electric field distribution at the plane y=70δ and (b) refers to the electric field distribution at the exit plane z=101δ. In Figure 2(a), the light intensity profile clearly displays the path of the beam reflected by the damage sites, the standing wave generated by these reflections, and the high intensity spots resulting from constructive interference between these waves. The simulations confirm that electric field is enhanced due to the existence of damage sites. Figure 2(b) is the light intensity profile at the exit plane. It is confirmed that the light intensity is enhanced remarkably at the exit plane, and the peak value of light intensity reaches 2.2 V/m. Also, the higher intensity spots appear at the rim of the damage sites. This phenomenon is in great agreement with corresponding experimental result of [13].In order to discuss the effect of the damage sites density on electric field enhancement, we give the evolution of the maximal electric field intensity withR for three different planes (see Figure 3). It can be seen that the evolution trends of the three curves are similar. These curves all increase firstly and then decrease. As three damage sites appear together at the fused silica surface, the incident wave is reflected by each damage site firstly and then interference occurs between the reflection waves. With the increase of R, in other words, with the decrease of damage sites density, Emax⁡ reaches its peak value as the condition of constructive interference is satisfied. With the further increase of R, the probability of the interference occurring between the reflections waves of each damage site decreases. So Emax⁡ decreases rapidly.Also it can be observed from Figure3 that peak value of Emax⁡ at exit plane is the highest. This shows that the enhancement is the most remarkable at exit plane. It is identical with the results of Figure 2 and the corresponding experiment [13].From the evolution trend of each curve in Figure3, we can find that for every curve there is a given R at which the maximum of electric field is strongest. For example, the R is 30δ for the curve describing the evolution of Emax⁡ with R at the exit plane and R is 22δ for the curve describing the evolution at the plane y=100δ. Another thing that should be pointed out is that the defect density decreases with the increasing of R for a certain surface area.


### 3.2. The Effect of Distribution Mode on Modulation

In this section, the role of the distribution modes of damage sites played during modulation to electric field is discussed. Figures4(a), 4(c), and 4(e) show that the electric field distribution as the centre of three damage sites is in a line, while (b), (d), and (f) show that the electric field distribution as the centre of three damage sites is in a circle as shown by Figure 1. The radiuses of all damage sites are 15δ. The damage sites densities can be regarded as the same for two distribution modes in a given area S=π(R+r)2. Figures 4(a) and 4(b) refer to the electric field distribution of the same plane z=40δ. Figures 4(c) and 4(d) refer to the electric field distribution in plane z=80δ. Figures 4(e) and 4(f) refer to the electric field distribution in plane z=100δ, which is the rear surface of fused silica.Figure 1
2D schematic plots of damage sites.Distribution of electric field at (a) planey=70δ and (b) plane z=101δ.
(a)
(b)Figure 3
Plot of peak electric field intensity as a function ofR.Electric field distribution for two kinds of damage site distribution mode.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)From Figure4, an interesting phenomenon can be found. In spite of the variation of the electric field distribution, the peak values of Emax⁡ of (a) and (b) do not differ much more, and the peak values of Emax⁡ of (c) and (d) do not differ much more too, as well as (e) and (f), shown by Table 1. That is to say, the effect of defect distribution mode is not so sensitive when the damage sites density is the same.Table 1
E
max
⁡ (V/m) for the two modes of three defects according to Figure 4.
Z
=
40
δ
Z
=
80
δ
Z
=
100
δ
Distribution in a line
(a) 1.375
(c) 1.700
(e)2.130
Distribution in a circle
(b) 1.450
(d) 1.950
(f)2.210
Difference
0.075
0.25
0.07


## 3.1. Electric Field Modulations

First, the light intensity profiles of the damage sites are plotted using a gray scale at two different planes: (a) planey=70δ and (b) plane z=101δ (see Figure 2). The gray scale is adapted so as to facilitate the comparison between the light intensity modulated by the damage sites and the incident light intensity. In the simulations of Figure 2, the radiuses of the three damage sites are all 15δ. The centers of the three damage sites are in a given circle with the radius R. All the calculations are performed for normal-incidence illumination. Figure 2(a) refers to the electric field distribution at the plane y=70δ and (b) refers to the electric field distribution at the exit plane z=101δ. In Figure 2(a), the light intensity profile clearly displays the path of the beam reflected by the damage sites, the standing wave generated by these reflections, and the high intensity spots resulting from constructive interference between these waves. The simulations confirm that electric field is enhanced due to the existence of damage sites. Figure 2(b) is the light intensity profile at the exit plane. It is confirmed that the light intensity is enhanced remarkably at the exit plane, and the peak value of light intensity reaches 2.2 V/m. Also, the higher intensity spots appear at the rim of the damage sites. This phenomenon is in great agreement with corresponding experimental result of [13].In order to discuss the effect of the damage sites density on electric field enhancement, we give the evolution of the maximal electric field intensity withR for three different planes (see Figure 3). It can be seen that the evolution trends of the three curves are similar. These curves all increase firstly and then decrease. As three damage sites appear together at the fused silica surface, the incident wave is reflected by each damage site firstly and then interference occurs between the reflection waves. With the increase of R, in other words, with the decrease of damage sites density, Emax⁡ reaches its peak value as the condition of constructive interference is satisfied. With the further increase of R, the probability of the interference occurring between the reflections waves of each damage site decreases. So Emax⁡ decreases rapidly.Also it can be observed from Figure3 that peak value of Emax⁡ at exit plane is the highest. This shows that the enhancement is the most remarkable at exit plane. It is identical with the results of Figure 2 and the corresponding experiment [13].From the evolution trend of each curve in Figure3, we can find that for every curve there is a given R at which the maximum of electric field is strongest. For example, the R is 30δ for the curve describing the evolution of Emax⁡ with R at the exit plane and R is 22δ for the curve describing the evolution at the plane y=100δ. Another thing that should be pointed out is that the defect density decreases with the increasing of R for a certain surface area.


## 3.2. The Effect of Distribution Mode on Modulation

In this section, the role of the distribution modes of damage sites played during modulation to electric field is discussed. Figures4(a), 4(c), and 4(e) show that the electric field distribution as the centre of three damage sites is in a line, while (b), (d), and (f) show that the electric field distribution as the centre of three damage sites is in a circle as shown by Figure 1. The radiuses of all damage sites are 15δ. The damage sites densities can be regarded as the same for two distribution modes in a given area S=π(R+r)2. Figures 4(a) and 4(b) refer to the electric field distribution of the same plane z=40δ. Figures 4(c) and 4(d) refer to the electric field distribution in plane z=80δ. Figures 4(e) and 4(f) refer to the electric field distribution in plane z=100δ, which is the rear surface of fused silica.Figure 1
2D schematic plots of damage sites.Distribution of electric field at (a) planey=70δ and (b) plane z=101δ.
(a)
(b)Figure 3
Plot of peak electric field intensity as a function ofR.Electric field distribution for two kinds of damage site distribution mode.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)From Figure4, an interesting phenomenon can be found. In spite of the variation of the electric field distribution, the peak values of Emax⁡ of (a) and (b) do not differ much more, and the peak values of Emax⁡ of (c) and (d) do not differ much more too, as well as (e) and (f), shown by Table 1. That is to say, the effect of defect distribution mode is not so sensitive when the damage sites density is the same.Table 1
E
max
⁡ (V/m) for the two modes of three defects according to Figure 4.
Z
=
40
δ
Z
=
80
δ
Z
=
100
δ
Distribution in a line
(a) 1.375
(c) 1.700
(e)2.130
Distribution in a circle
(b) 1.450
(d) 1.950
(f)2.210
Difference
0.075
0.25
0.07


## 4. Conclusions

With the above discussion, there are several conclusions obtained.(1) As the centers of the three damage sites are in a given circle with the radiusR, the electric field modulation is much obviously. With the decrease of damage sites density, a peak value of the maximum electric field appears. In the whole trend, the larger the damage sites density is, the stronger the modulation is.(2) As the damage sites density is the same, the modulation is not too sensible to defect distribution mode.



---

*Source: 843261-2014-06-11.xml*