# Antioxidant Capacity of “Mexican Arnica”Heterotheca inuloides Cass Natural Products and Some Derivatives: Their Anti-Inflammatory Evaluation and Effect on C. elegans Life Span

Authors: José Luis Rodríguez-Chávez; Elvia Coballase-Urrutia; Antonio Nieto-Camacho; Guillermo Delgado-Lamas
Journal: Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

It has been suggested that the accumulation of biomolecular damage caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) contributes to aging. The antioxidant activity is related to the ability of certain compounds to protect against the potentially harmful effect of processes or reactions involving ROS. This ability is associated with the termination of free radical propagation in biological systems. FromHeterotheca inuloides various compounds which have shown to possess antioxidant capacity and scavenging ROS. The aim of this study was to determine the antioxidant capacity of additional natural components isolated from H. inuloides and some semisynthetic derivatives, their anti-inflammatory activity and the effect on Caenorhabditis elegans nematode life span. Compounds showed ability to inhibit various biological processes such as lipid peroxidation, scavenge nonbiological important oxidants such as 1O2, OH∙, H2O2, and HOCl and scavenge non biological stable free radicals (DPPH). Some cadinane type compounds showed possess antioxidant, ROS scavenging capacity, anti-inflammatory activity, and effect on the C. elegans life span. Flavonoid type compounds increased the life of the nematode and quercetin was identified as the compound with the greatest activity. The modification of chemical structure led to a change in the antioxidant capacity, the anti-inflammatory activity, and the survival of the worm.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) exist as products of normal cellular physiology and play vital roles in the stimulation of signaling pathways in plant and animal cells [1]. Aerobic organisms produce ROS during the reduction of molecular oxygen by mitochondria [2]. ROS include free radicals such as superoxide anion (O2-), hydroxyl radical (OH∙), and nonradical molecules like hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), singlet oxygen (1O2), and other species such as nitric oxide (NO), hypochlorous acid (HOCl), and peroxynitrite (ONOO−). When the level of ROS exceeds away cellular factors responsible for protecting cellular biomolecules against damage generated by oxidizing species is said to be in a state of “oxidative stress.” Under these conditions ROS can damage biomolecules like nucleic acids, proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, and enzymes. This condition has been implicated in the pathogenesis of a number of multiple pathologies such as senescence [3], ischemia/reperfusion injury [4], neurodegenerative diseases [5], infectious processes [6], rheumatoid arthritis [7], arterial diseases [8], obesity, diabetes, chronic kidney disease [9], and other ailments.Heterotheca inuloides is commonly known as “Mexican arnica” and it is known by other names in different regions of Mexico [10, 11]. In Mexican traditional medicine the infusions of this plant are mainly used for treatment of contusions and bruises [12]. Phytochemical studies of this plant, allowed isolating different classes of compounds, mainly cadinane type sesquiterpenes [13], flavonoids [14], and phytosterols [15]. Previous studies have reported that metanolic extract and certain natural products isolated fromH. inuloides dried flowers have antioxidant activity and ability to inhibit lipid peroxidation, scavenging ROS and act as hepatoprotective agents [16–18]. However, the antioxidant activity of natural products isolated from the acetone extract has not been reported. In the present study, we evaluated the antioxidant and ROS scavenging capacity ofH. inuloides metabolites isolated from the acetonic extract and prepared semisynthetic derivatives and also evaluated their anti-inflammatory effects and effect on theC. elegans life span. Here we report the results considering the structure-activity relationships.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Reagents

All reagents used were of analytical grade. Sodium pyruvate, dimethyl thiourea (DMTU), nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA), ascorbic acid, histidine, xylenol orange (FOX), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), N,N-dimethyl-4-nitrosoaniline (DMNA), catalase, xanthine, xanthine oxidase, nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT), dL-penicillamine 2-thiobarbituric acid (TBA),α-tocopherol, Folin and Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent, 3,5-di-tert-4-butylhydroxytoluene (BHT), and 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Toluca, Mexico, or Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Absolute ethanol, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), sulfuric acid (H2SO4), methanol, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt (EDTA), NaCl, KH2PO4, NaHPO4·7H2O, NaOH, and H2SO4 were purchased from Merck-Mexico. Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) was purchased from Hycel (Mexico City, Mexico).


### 2.2. Strains ofC. elegans

ExperimentalC. elegans strain was wild type N2 (Bristol). The strain was obtained from the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and was maintained on nematode growth medium (NGM) at 20°C as described previously by Brenner [19]. Age-synchronized worms were generated in all experiments through the sodium hypochlorite method. Worms were allowed to hatch in Petri dishes in liquidS-medium with concentratedEscherichia coli OP50 as food [20].


### 2.3. Plant Material

Flowers ofH. inuloides (provided by MIXIM Laboratories, Naucalpan, Mexico) were collected in 2010, in the town of Mesas Altas de San Juan Xoconusco, municipality of Donato Guerra (State of Mexico), and authenticated by MS Abigail Aguilar-Contreras. A voucher of plant material was deposited under code IMSSM-16064 in the Medicinal Plant Herbarium of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS, Mexico City).


### 2.4.Heterotheca inuloides Metabolites and Derivatives

Compounds1–12 were isolated from the acetone extract of dried flowers ofH. inuloides in a previous study. Semisynthetic compounds 7-acetoxy-3,4-dihydrocadalene (13), 7-benzoxy-3,4-dihydrocadalene (14), 7-acetoxycadalene (15), 7-benzoxycadalene (16), quercetin pentaacetate (17), and 7-hydroxy calamenene (18) were obtained by conventional chemical procedures as was previously described [21] (Figure 1). Due to the paucity of material compounds10 and11 were not included in all the bioassays.Figure 1
Natural products isolated fromH. inuloides flowers and derivatives.


### 2.5. Antioxidant Effects and ROS Scavenging ofH. inuloides Metabolites

#### 2.5.1. Estimation of Lipid Peroxidation

Lipid peroxidation was measured by TBARS assay using rat brain homogenates [22], with some modifications. Adult male Wistar rats (200–250 g) were provided by the Instituto de Fisiología Celular, UNAM, and their use was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee [23]. The animals sacrifice was carried out avoiding unnecessary pain with CO2, cerebral tissue (whole brain) was rapidly dissected and homogenized. The homogenate was centrifuged for 10 min at 3400 rpm to yield a pellet that was discarded; protein content in the supernatant was measured using the Folin and Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent [24] and adjusted to 2.66 mg protein/mL with PBS. The supernatant (375 μL) was incubated at 37°C for 30 min in presence of test sample (25 μL) dissolved in DMSO or ethanol and 50 μL of EDTA solution (20 μM). Lipid peroxidation was started adding 50 μL of a freshly prepared 100 μM FeSO4 solution (final concentration 10 μM) and incubated at 37°C for 60 min TBARS were determined as described by Ohkawa et al. [25] with some modifications. Concentration of TBARS was calculated by interpolation in a standard curve of tetrametoxipropane (TMP) [26]. Final results were expressed as mmoles of TBARS per mg of protein. The inhibition ratio (%) was calculated using the following formula:
(1)Inhibitionratio%=C-EC×100%,
where C was the absorbance of control and E was the absorbance of the test sample.


#### 2.5.2.DPPH∙ Scavenging Capacity

DPPH assay was assessed in 96-well microtiter plates according to the method of Blois [27] with minor changes. Briefly, 0.05 mL of test compounds in DMSO at different concentrations was added to an ethanolic solution of 2,2-diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH∙) (133.33 μM, 0.150 mL). The control sample contained distilled water. Reaction mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 30 min in the dark. After incubation the absorbance was measured at 515 nm in a microplate reader ELx808 (BioTek Instruments, Inc., Vermont, USA). The % inhibition of each compound was determined by comparison with a DPPH ethanol blank solution [28]. The scavenging capacity is given as percent (%) DPPH scavenged, calculated as [(optical density of control − optical density of compound)/(optical density of control) × 100]; α-tocopherol was used as standard.


#### 2.5.3. Superoxide Radical-Scavenging Activity

The superoxide radicals (O2-) were generated through the system xanthine oxidase [29]. O2- in the assay system and xanthine oxidase activity were measured as NBT reduction using a DU-640 series Beckman spectrophotometer. 800 μL of the following reaction mixtures: 90 μM xanthine, 16 mM Na2CO3, 22.8 μM NBT, and 18 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) was mixed with 100 μL of different concentrations ofH. inuloides metabolites. The reaction was started by the addition of 100 μL of xanthine oxidase (168 U/L). Optical density was registered both at 295 (for uric acid production) and at 560 nm (for O2- in the assay system). The absorbance was determined using a Beckman DU640 Spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc. California, USA).


#### 2.5.4. Peroxide Scavenging Activity

Determination of scavenging capacity was made by ferrous ion oxidation-xylenol orange (FOX) assay [30]. Concentration of H2O2 was calculated from a standard curve prepared with increasing H2O2 concentrations. A solution of 75 μM H2O2 was mixed (1 : 1 v/v) with water (0% scavenging tube) or with different concentrations ofH. inuloides metabolites and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. After this, H2O2 was measured by the following method. Briefly, 9 volumes of 4.4 mM BHT in HPLC-grade methanol were mixed with 1 volume of 1 mM xylenol orange and 2.56 mM ammonium ferrous sulphate in 0.25 M H2SO4 to give the working FOX reagent. 45 μL of the metabolite solutions and 45 μL of 75 μM H2O2 were dispensed in 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes and mixed with 10 μL of HPLC-grade methanol immediately followed by the addition of 0.9 mL of FOX reagent, mixed on a vortex mixer for 5 s and then incubated at room temperature for 10 min. The tubes were centrifuged for 15,000 g for 10 min and absorbance at 560 nm was read against a methanol blank using a Beckman DU640 Spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc. California, USA). The concentration of H2O2 was calculated from a standard curve prepared with increasing H2O2 concentrations. Sodium pyruvate was used as standard for H2O2 scavenging activity.


#### 2.5.5. Hydroxyl Radical-Scavenging Activity

The malondialdehyde formed from the decay of deoxyribose was evaluated in reaction with thiobarbituric acid and measured at 532 nm [31]. The reaction mixture containing deoxyribose (0.056 mM), H2O2 (1 mM), potassium phosphate buffer (10 mM, pH 7.4), FeCl3 (0.2 mM), EDTA (0.2 mM), ascorbic acid (0.2 mM), and 100 μL of different concentrations ofH. inuloides was incubated in a water bath at 37±0.5°C for 1 h. The extent of the deoxyribose degradation by the OH∙ formed was measured by the thiobarbituric acid test at 532 nm using a Beckman DU640 Spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc. California, USA). The ability ofH. inuloides metabolites to scavenge OH∙ was compared with that of DMTU (0, 1, 2, 10, 20, and 31 μg/mL). The final results were expressed as inhibition percent in relation to a control test (without the sample).


#### 2.5.6. Singlet Oxygen (1O2) Scavenging Activity

The ability of the compounds to scavenging1O2 was detected spectrophotometrically at 440 nm using the bleaching of N,N-dimethyl p-nitrosoaniline (DMNA) as a specific detector [32]. The assay mixture contained 45 mM Na-phosphate buffer (pH 7.1), 10 mM histidine, 10 mM NaOCl, 10 mM H2O2, 50 μM DMNA, and 0.1 mL of different concentration of compounds. The total volume of reaction (2.0 mL) was incubated at 30°C for 40 min. The extent of 1O2 production was determined by measuring the decrease in the absorbance of DMNA at 440 nm using a Beckman DU640 Spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc. California, USA). The relative scavenging efficiency (% inhibition production of 1O2) ofH. inuloides metabolites was estimated from the difference in absorbance of DMNA with and without the addition of compounds being tested or reference compound. Glutathione (0, 0.92, 1.53, 2.15, 2.45, and 3.07 mg/mL) was used as standard for 1O2 scavenging.


#### 2.5.7. HOCl Scavenging Assay

The HOCl scavenging activity was evaluated by measuring the decrease in absorbance of catalase at 404 nm and was carried out as described by Aruoma and Halliwell [33] with minor changes. Briefly, 150 μL of 49.8 μM bovine liver catalase solution (16.6 μM, final concentration) was mixed with 150 μL of 18 mM HOCl (6 mM, final concentration) and 150 μL ofH. inuloides metabolite solutions in increasing concentrations or the reference compound ascorbic acid (0, 22, 44, 88 and 176 μg/mL). Spectra (370–450 nm) of catalase alone, catalase plus HOCl, or catalase plus HOCl andH. inuloides metabolites or the reference compound were registered and the optical densities (OD) at 404 nm were determined using a Beckman DU640 Spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc., California, USA). The value of the OD of catalase alone minus the OD of catalase plus HOCl was considered as 100% of degradation of catalase (or 0% of scavenging activity), and the difference of the catalase alone minus the OD of the catalase plus HOCl in presence of eitherH. inuloides metabolites or reference compound was compared against this value. The ability of TPM to scavenge HOCl was compared with that of ascorbic acid.


### 2.6. Evaluation of Anti-Inflammatory Effect

The biological model employed was ear edema in mice induced by 13-ethyl-12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol (TPA), as described by Rao et al. [34] with slight modifications. CD1 male mice were used. Mice were administered with sodium pentobarbital (31.5 mg/kg, ip) and TPA solution (2.5 μg/ear) dissolved in ethanol (10 μL). This was done topically on the right ear, in both faces of the ear. The left ear received only ethanol, 10 min after the test substances (1 μmol/ear) or indomethacin (0.31 μmol/ear) as drug reference. The tested substances and indomethacin were dissolved in 20 μL of acetone and administered on both sides of the ears (10 μL/side). The control only received the vehicle (20 μL of acetone). Four hours later the mice were killed with CO2. A 7 mm diameter plug was removed from each ear. The swelling was assessed as the difference in weight between right and left ear plugs. The anti-inflammatory activity was expressed as inhibition of edema (IE) in percent relative to the edema formed in control animals according with the following formula: IE (%) = 100 − [B × 100/A], where A = edema induced by TPA alone, and B = edema induced by TPA plus sample.


### 2.7. Lifespan Assay

Lifespan assays were assessed in liquid medium at 20°C in 96-well plates (Corning, NY) and were carried out according to the established protocols [35]. Briefly, the nematodes were age-synchronized and distributed in wells as L1 larvae (10–20 animals per well) together withEscherichia coli OP50. To prevent self-fertilization, 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine was added 36 h after seeding (0.12 mM final). Media were supplemented with different doses of compounds (100 or 200 μM). DMSO/ethanol (50/50% v/v) was included as a solvent control. The worms were monitored daily to observe the number of live worms in each treatment, the fraction of animals alive was scored on the basis of body movement. Observations and worm counts were performed using a microscope Eclipse TS 100 (Nikon Instruments Inc., Tokyo, Japan).


### 2.8. Statistical Analysis

For lipid peroxidation and DPPH scavenging data were represented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test for comparisons against control. Values ofP≤0.05 (*) and P≤0.01 (**) were considered statistically significant. The inhibitory concentration 50 (IC50) was estimated by means of a linear regression equation. For scavenging capacity data were expressed as mean ± SEM. The data were compared against the blank tube withoutH. inuloides metabolites or the reference compounds, using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison test (GraphPad Prism 4.0 Software, San Diego, CA, USA). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The scavenging capacity was expressed as the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) value, which denotes the concentration ofH. inuloides metabolites or the reference compounds required to give a 50% reduction in oxidating effect relative to the blank tube. The data of the lifespan assays were processed using the GraphPad Prism 4.0 Software, (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Survival was plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method and the curves compared for significance using the log-rank test.


## 2.1. Reagents

All reagents used were of analytical grade. Sodium pyruvate, dimethyl thiourea (DMTU), nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA), ascorbic acid, histidine, xylenol orange (FOX), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), N,N-dimethyl-4-nitrosoaniline (DMNA), catalase, xanthine, xanthine oxidase, nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT), dL-penicillamine 2-thiobarbituric acid (TBA),α-tocopherol, Folin and Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent, 3,5-di-tert-4-butylhydroxytoluene (BHT), and 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Toluca, Mexico, or Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Absolute ethanol, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), sulfuric acid (H2SO4), methanol, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt (EDTA), NaCl, KH2PO4, NaHPO4·7H2O, NaOH, and H2SO4 were purchased from Merck-Mexico. Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) was purchased from Hycel (Mexico City, Mexico).


## 2.2. Strains ofC. elegans

ExperimentalC. elegans strain was wild type N2 (Bristol). The strain was obtained from the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and was maintained on nematode growth medium (NGM) at 20°C as described previously by Brenner [19]. Age-synchronized worms were generated in all experiments through the sodium hypochlorite method. Worms were allowed to hatch in Petri dishes in liquidS-medium with concentratedEscherichia coli OP50 as food [20].


## 2.3. Plant Material

Flowers ofH. inuloides (provided by MIXIM Laboratories, Naucalpan, Mexico) were collected in 2010, in the town of Mesas Altas de San Juan Xoconusco, municipality of Donato Guerra (State of Mexico), and authenticated by MS Abigail Aguilar-Contreras. A voucher of plant material was deposited under code IMSSM-16064 in the Medicinal Plant Herbarium of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS, Mexico City).


## 2.4.Heterotheca inuloides Metabolites and Derivatives

Compounds1–12 were isolated from the acetone extract of dried flowers ofH. inuloides in a previous study. Semisynthetic compounds 7-acetoxy-3,4-dihydrocadalene (13), 7-benzoxy-3,4-dihydrocadalene (14), 7-acetoxycadalene (15), 7-benzoxycadalene (16), quercetin pentaacetate (17), and 7-hydroxy calamenene (18) were obtained by conventional chemical procedures as was previously described [21] (Figure 1). Due to the paucity of material compounds10 and11 were not included in all the bioassays.Figure 1
Natural products isolated fromH. inuloides flowers and derivatives.


## 2.5. Antioxidant Effects and ROS Scavenging ofH. inuloides Metabolites

### 2.5.1. Estimation of Lipid Peroxidation

Lipid peroxidation was measured by TBARS assay using rat brain homogenates [22], with some modifications. Adult male Wistar rats (200–250 g) were provided by the Instituto de Fisiología Celular, UNAM, and their use was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee [23]. The animals sacrifice was carried out avoiding unnecessary pain with CO2, cerebral tissue (whole brain) was rapidly dissected and homogenized. The homogenate was centrifuged for 10 min at 3400 rpm to yield a pellet that was discarded; protein content in the supernatant was measured using the Folin and Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent [24] and adjusted to 2.66 mg protein/mL with PBS. The supernatant (375 μL) was incubated at 37°C for 30 min in presence of test sample (25 μL) dissolved in DMSO or ethanol and 50 μL of EDTA solution (20 μM). Lipid peroxidation was started adding 50 μL of a freshly prepared 100 μM FeSO4 solution (final concentration 10 μM) and incubated at 37°C for 60 min TBARS were determined as described by Ohkawa et al. [25] with some modifications. Concentration of TBARS was calculated by interpolation in a standard curve of tetrametoxipropane (TMP) [26]. Final results were expressed as mmoles of TBARS per mg of protein. The inhibition ratio (%) was calculated using the following formula:
(1)Inhibitionratio%=C-EC×100%,
where C was the absorbance of control and E was the absorbance of the test sample.


### 2.5.2.DPPH∙ Scavenging Capacity

DPPH assay was assessed in 96-well microtiter plates according to the method of Blois [27] with minor changes. Briefly, 0.05 mL of test compounds in DMSO at different concentrations was added to an ethanolic solution of 2,2-diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH∙) (133.33 μM, 0.150 mL). The control sample contained distilled water. Reaction mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 30 min in the dark. After incubation the absorbance was measured at 515 nm in a microplate reader ELx808 (BioTek Instruments, Inc., Vermont, USA). The % inhibition of each compound was determined by comparison with a DPPH ethanol blank solution [28]. The scavenging capacity is given as percent (%) DPPH scavenged, calculated as [(optical density of control − optical density of compound)/(optical density of control) × 100]; α-tocopherol was used as standard.


### 2.5.3. Superoxide Radical-Scavenging Activity

The superoxide radicals (O2-) were generated through the system xanthine oxidase [29]. O2- in the assay system and xanthine oxidase activity were measured as NBT reduction using a DU-640 series Beckman spectrophotometer. 800 μL of the following reaction mixtures: 90 μM xanthine, 16 mM Na2CO3, 22.8 μM NBT, and 18 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) was mixed with 100 μL of different concentrations ofH. inuloides metabolites. The reaction was started by the addition of 100 μL of xanthine oxidase (168 U/L). Optical density was registered both at 295 (for uric acid production) and at 560 nm (for O2- in the assay system). The absorbance was determined using a Beckman DU640 Spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc. California, USA).


### 2.5.4. Peroxide Scavenging Activity

Determination of scavenging capacity was made by ferrous ion oxidation-xylenol orange (FOX) assay [30]. Concentration of H2O2 was calculated from a standard curve prepared with increasing H2O2 concentrations. A solution of 75 μM H2O2 was mixed (1 : 1 v/v) with water (0% scavenging tube) or with different concentrations ofH. inuloides metabolites and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. After this, H2O2 was measured by the following method. Briefly, 9 volumes of 4.4 mM BHT in HPLC-grade methanol were mixed with 1 volume of 1 mM xylenol orange and 2.56 mM ammonium ferrous sulphate in 0.25 M H2SO4 to give the working FOX reagent. 45 μL of the metabolite solutions and 45 μL of 75 μM H2O2 were dispensed in 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes and mixed with 10 μL of HPLC-grade methanol immediately followed by the addition of 0.9 mL of FOX reagent, mixed on a vortex mixer for 5 s and then incubated at room temperature for 10 min. The tubes were centrifuged for 15,000 g for 10 min and absorbance at 560 nm was read against a methanol blank using a Beckman DU640 Spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc. California, USA). The concentration of H2O2 was calculated from a standard curve prepared with increasing H2O2 concentrations. Sodium pyruvate was used as standard for H2O2 scavenging activity.


### 2.5.5. Hydroxyl Radical-Scavenging Activity

The malondialdehyde formed from the decay of deoxyribose was evaluated in reaction with thiobarbituric acid and measured at 532 nm [31]. The reaction mixture containing deoxyribose (0.056 mM), H2O2 (1 mM), potassium phosphate buffer (10 mM, pH 7.4), FeCl3 (0.2 mM), EDTA (0.2 mM), ascorbic acid (0.2 mM), and 100 μL of different concentrations ofH. inuloides was incubated in a water bath at 37±0.5°C for 1 h. The extent of the deoxyribose degradation by the OH∙ formed was measured by the thiobarbituric acid test at 532 nm using a Beckman DU640 Spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc. California, USA). The ability ofH. inuloides metabolites to scavenge OH∙ was compared with that of DMTU (0, 1, 2, 10, 20, and 31 μg/mL). The final results were expressed as inhibition percent in relation to a control test (without the sample).


### 2.5.6. Singlet Oxygen (1O2) Scavenging Activity

The ability of the compounds to scavenging1O2 was detected spectrophotometrically at 440 nm using the bleaching of N,N-dimethyl p-nitrosoaniline (DMNA) as a specific detector [32]. The assay mixture contained 45 mM Na-phosphate buffer (pH 7.1), 10 mM histidine, 10 mM NaOCl, 10 mM H2O2, 50 μM DMNA, and 0.1 mL of different concentration of compounds. The total volume of reaction (2.0 mL) was incubated at 30°C for 40 min. The extent of 1O2 production was determined by measuring the decrease in the absorbance of DMNA at 440 nm using a Beckman DU640 Spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc. California, USA). The relative scavenging efficiency (% inhibition production of 1O2) ofH. inuloides metabolites was estimated from the difference in absorbance of DMNA with and without the addition of compounds being tested or reference compound. Glutathione (0, 0.92, 1.53, 2.15, 2.45, and 3.07 mg/mL) was used as standard for 1O2 scavenging.


### 2.5.7. HOCl Scavenging Assay

The HOCl scavenging activity was evaluated by measuring the decrease in absorbance of catalase at 404 nm and was carried out as described by Aruoma and Halliwell [33] with minor changes. Briefly, 150 μL of 49.8 μM bovine liver catalase solution (16.6 μM, final concentration) was mixed with 150 μL of 18 mM HOCl (6 mM, final concentration) and 150 μL ofH. inuloides metabolite solutions in increasing concentrations or the reference compound ascorbic acid (0, 22, 44, 88 and 176 μg/mL). Spectra (370–450 nm) of catalase alone, catalase plus HOCl, or catalase plus HOCl andH. inuloides metabolites or the reference compound were registered and the optical densities (OD) at 404 nm were determined using a Beckman DU640 Spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc., California, USA). The value of the OD of catalase alone minus the OD of catalase plus HOCl was considered as 100% of degradation of catalase (or 0% of scavenging activity), and the difference of the catalase alone minus the OD of the catalase plus HOCl in presence of eitherH. inuloides metabolites or reference compound was compared against this value. The ability of TPM to scavenge HOCl was compared with that of ascorbic acid.


## 2.5.1. Estimation of Lipid Peroxidation

Lipid peroxidation was measured by TBARS assay using rat brain homogenates [22], with some modifications. Adult male Wistar rats (200–250 g) were provided by the Instituto de Fisiología Celular, UNAM, and their use was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee [23]. The animals sacrifice was carried out avoiding unnecessary pain with CO2, cerebral tissue (whole brain) was rapidly dissected and homogenized. The homogenate was centrifuged for 10 min at 3400 rpm to yield a pellet that was discarded; protein content in the supernatant was measured using the Folin and Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent [24] and adjusted to 2.66 mg protein/mL with PBS. The supernatant (375 μL) was incubated at 37°C for 30 min in presence of test sample (25 μL) dissolved in DMSO or ethanol and 50 μL of EDTA solution (20 μM). Lipid peroxidation was started adding 50 μL of a freshly prepared 100 μM FeSO4 solution (final concentration 10 μM) and incubated at 37°C for 60 min TBARS were determined as described by Ohkawa et al. [25] with some modifications. Concentration of TBARS was calculated by interpolation in a standard curve of tetrametoxipropane (TMP) [26]. Final results were expressed as mmoles of TBARS per mg of protein. The inhibition ratio (%) was calculated using the following formula:
(1)Inhibitionratio%=C-EC×100%,
where C was the absorbance of control and E was the absorbance of the test sample.


## 2.5.2.DPPH∙ Scavenging Capacity

DPPH assay was assessed in 96-well microtiter plates according to the method of Blois [27] with minor changes. Briefly, 0.05 mL of test compounds in DMSO at different concentrations was added to an ethanolic solution of 2,2-diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH∙) (133.33 μM, 0.150 mL). The control sample contained distilled water. Reaction mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 30 min in the dark. After incubation the absorbance was measured at 515 nm in a microplate reader ELx808 (BioTek Instruments, Inc., Vermont, USA). The % inhibition of each compound was determined by comparison with a DPPH ethanol blank solution [28]. The scavenging capacity is given as percent (%) DPPH scavenged, calculated as [(optical density of control − optical density of compound)/(optical density of control) × 100]; α-tocopherol was used as standard.


## 2.5.3. Superoxide Radical-Scavenging Activity

The superoxide radicals (O2-) were generated through the system xanthine oxidase [29]. O2- in the assay system and xanthine oxidase activity were measured as NBT reduction using a DU-640 series Beckman spectrophotometer. 800 μL of the following reaction mixtures: 90 μM xanthine, 16 mM Na2CO3, 22.8 μM NBT, and 18 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) was mixed with 100 μL of different concentrations ofH. inuloides metabolites. The reaction was started by the addition of 100 μL of xanthine oxidase (168 U/L). Optical density was registered both at 295 (for uric acid production) and at 560 nm (for O2- in the assay system). The absorbance was determined using a Beckman DU640 Spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc. California, USA).


## 2.5.4. Peroxide Scavenging Activity

Determination of scavenging capacity was made by ferrous ion oxidation-xylenol orange (FOX) assay [30]. Concentration of H2O2 was calculated from a standard curve prepared with increasing H2O2 concentrations. A solution of 75 μM H2O2 was mixed (1 : 1 v/v) with water (0% scavenging tube) or with different concentrations ofH. inuloides metabolites and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. After this, H2O2 was measured by the following method. Briefly, 9 volumes of 4.4 mM BHT in HPLC-grade methanol were mixed with 1 volume of 1 mM xylenol orange and 2.56 mM ammonium ferrous sulphate in 0.25 M H2SO4 to give the working FOX reagent. 45 μL of the metabolite solutions and 45 μL of 75 μM H2O2 were dispensed in 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes and mixed with 10 μL of HPLC-grade methanol immediately followed by the addition of 0.9 mL of FOX reagent, mixed on a vortex mixer for 5 s and then incubated at room temperature for 10 min. The tubes were centrifuged for 15,000 g for 10 min and absorbance at 560 nm was read against a methanol blank using a Beckman DU640 Spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc. California, USA). The concentration of H2O2 was calculated from a standard curve prepared with increasing H2O2 concentrations. Sodium pyruvate was used as standard for H2O2 scavenging activity.


## 2.5.5. Hydroxyl Radical-Scavenging Activity

The malondialdehyde formed from the decay of deoxyribose was evaluated in reaction with thiobarbituric acid and measured at 532 nm [31]. The reaction mixture containing deoxyribose (0.056 mM), H2O2 (1 mM), potassium phosphate buffer (10 mM, pH 7.4), FeCl3 (0.2 mM), EDTA (0.2 mM), ascorbic acid (0.2 mM), and 100 μL of different concentrations ofH. inuloides was incubated in a water bath at 37±0.5°C for 1 h. The extent of the deoxyribose degradation by the OH∙ formed was measured by the thiobarbituric acid test at 532 nm using a Beckman DU640 Spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc. California, USA). The ability ofH. inuloides metabolites to scavenge OH∙ was compared with that of DMTU (0, 1, 2, 10, 20, and 31 μg/mL). The final results were expressed as inhibition percent in relation to a control test (without the sample).


## 2.5.6. Singlet Oxygen (1O2) Scavenging Activity

The ability of the compounds to scavenging1O2 was detected spectrophotometrically at 440 nm using the bleaching of N,N-dimethyl p-nitrosoaniline (DMNA) as a specific detector [32]. The assay mixture contained 45 mM Na-phosphate buffer (pH 7.1), 10 mM histidine, 10 mM NaOCl, 10 mM H2O2, 50 μM DMNA, and 0.1 mL of different concentration of compounds. The total volume of reaction (2.0 mL) was incubated at 30°C for 40 min. The extent of 1O2 production was determined by measuring the decrease in the absorbance of DMNA at 440 nm using a Beckman DU640 Spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc. California, USA). The relative scavenging efficiency (% inhibition production of 1O2) ofH. inuloides metabolites was estimated from the difference in absorbance of DMNA with and without the addition of compounds being tested or reference compound. Glutathione (0, 0.92, 1.53, 2.15, 2.45, and 3.07 mg/mL) was used as standard for 1O2 scavenging.


## 2.5.7. HOCl Scavenging Assay

The HOCl scavenging activity was evaluated by measuring the decrease in absorbance of catalase at 404 nm and was carried out as described by Aruoma and Halliwell [33] with minor changes. Briefly, 150 μL of 49.8 μM bovine liver catalase solution (16.6 μM, final concentration) was mixed with 150 μL of 18 mM HOCl (6 mM, final concentration) and 150 μL ofH. inuloides metabolite solutions in increasing concentrations or the reference compound ascorbic acid (0, 22, 44, 88 and 176 μg/mL). Spectra (370–450 nm) of catalase alone, catalase plus HOCl, or catalase plus HOCl andH. inuloides metabolites or the reference compound were registered and the optical densities (OD) at 404 nm were determined using a Beckman DU640 Spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc., California, USA). The value of the OD of catalase alone minus the OD of catalase plus HOCl was considered as 100% of degradation of catalase (or 0% of scavenging activity), and the difference of the catalase alone minus the OD of the catalase plus HOCl in presence of eitherH. inuloides metabolites or reference compound was compared against this value. The ability of TPM to scavenge HOCl was compared with that of ascorbic acid.


## 2.6. Evaluation of Anti-Inflammatory Effect

The biological model employed was ear edema in mice induced by 13-ethyl-12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol (TPA), as described by Rao et al. [34] with slight modifications. CD1 male mice were used. Mice were administered with sodium pentobarbital (31.5 mg/kg, ip) and TPA solution (2.5 μg/ear) dissolved in ethanol (10 μL). This was done topically on the right ear, in both faces of the ear. The left ear received only ethanol, 10 min after the test substances (1 μmol/ear) or indomethacin (0.31 μmol/ear) as drug reference. The tested substances and indomethacin were dissolved in 20 μL of acetone and administered on both sides of the ears (10 μL/side). The control only received the vehicle (20 μL of acetone). Four hours later the mice were killed with CO2. A 7 mm diameter plug was removed from each ear. The swelling was assessed as the difference in weight between right and left ear plugs. The anti-inflammatory activity was expressed as inhibition of edema (IE) in percent relative to the edema formed in control animals according with the following formula: IE (%) = 100 − [B × 100/A], where A = edema induced by TPA alone, and B = edema induced by TPA plus sample.


## 2.7. Lifespan Assay

Lifespan assays were assessed in liquid medium at 20°C in 96-well plates (Corning, NY) and were carried out according to the established protocols [35]. Briefly, the nematodes were age-synchronized and distributed in wells as L1 larvae (10–20 animals per well) together withEscherichia coli OP50. To prevent self-fertilization, 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine was added 36 h after seeding (0.12 mM final). Media were supplemented with different doses of compounds (100 or 200 μM). DMSO/ethanol (50/50% v/v) was included as a solvent control. The worms were monitored daily to observe the number of live worms in each treatment, the fraction of animals alive was scored on the basis of body movement. Observations and worm counts were performed using a microscope Eclipse TS 100 (Nikon Instruments Inc., Tokyo, Japan).


## 2.8. Statistical Analysis

For lipid peroxidation and DPPH scavenging data were represented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test for comparisons against control. Values ofP≤0.05 (*) and P≤0.01 (**) were considered statistically significant. The inhibitory concentration 50 (IC50) was estimated by means of a linear regression equation. For scavenging capacity data were expressed as mean ± SEM. The data were compared against the blank tube withoutH. inuloides metabolites or the reference compounds, using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison test (GraphPad Prism 4.0 Software, San Diego, CA, USA). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The scavenging capacity was expressed as the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) value, which denotes the concentration ofH. inuloides metabolites or the reference compounds required to give a 50% reduction in oxidating effect relative to the blank tube. The data of the lifespan assays were processed using the GraphPad Prism 4.0 Software, (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Survival was plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method and the curves compared for significance using the log-rank test.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Antioxidant Effects and ROS Scavenging

Our results showed that only compounds2,6, and9 displayed the ability to reduce DPPH radical with a IC50 of 30.66±8.14 μM, 13.11±1.2 μM, and 6.97±0.14 μM. Compounds1 and7 showed slight activity with IC50 higher than 100 μM. The other compounds tested showed a rate of antioxidant capacity less than 25% during the preliminary screening and therefore were not considered active (Table 1).Table 1
Capacity to inhibit lipid peroxidation and to reduce the DPPH radical.
Compound
IC50 μM
Lipid peroxidation
Reduction of DPPH
1
4.72 ± 0.11
>100
2
3.09 ± 0.19
30.66 ± 8.14
3
nd*
nd
4
nd
nd
6
4.30 ± 0.27
13.11 ± 1.2
7
6.16 ± 0.06
>100
8
nd
nd
9
14.46 ± 0.61
6.97 ± 0.14
11
17.35 ± 1.40
nd
12
nd
—
13
1.82 ± 0.12
nd
14
>100
nd
15
>100
nd
16
>100
nd
17
3.67 ± 0.43
—
18
0.58 ± 0.008
nd
α-Tocopherol
6.78  ±  2.16
31.74 ± 1
*Not determined: at the concentrations tested the activity of compounds was low.In peroxidation assay some compounds showed ability to inhibit this process. The inhibitory capacity of these compounds decreased in the following order:18 >13 >2 >17 >6>1>7>9 >11. Compound18 had an IC50 of 0.58±0.008 μM and showed to possess greater ability to inhibit lipid peroxidation than α-tocopherol used as reference substance whose IC50 was 6.78±2.16 μM. The derivatives14,15, and16 showed little ability to inhibit lipid peroxidation with IC50 higher than 100 μM.TheH. inuloides natural products, derivatives as well as the reference compounds, displayed O2-, HOCl, H2O2, 1O2, and OH∙ scavenging activity in a concentration-dependent way. The IC50 values were calculated from the dose-response curve (Table 2, Figure 2).Table 2
Scavenging capacity ofH. inuloidesmetabolites on hypochlorous acid, hydroxyl radical, peroxide, superoxide anion, and singlet oxygen (IC50).
Compound
Scavenging capacity IC50 μM
HOCl
OH•
H2O2
O
2
-
1O2
2
69.1 ± 8.8*
133.4 ± 32.6
270 ± 2.7*
114.6 ± 13.9*
880.4 ± 55.4*
3
202.3 ± 21.9*
545.4 ±  23.0*
422 ± 8.0*
105 ± 7.2*
538.9 ± 58.6
4
203.5 ± 23.9*
607.9 ±  33.5*
536 ± 14*
148 ± 13.0*
112.4 ± 29.3*
7
68.1 ± 5.77*
161.2 ±  27.2
201 ± 6.7*
20 ± 0.27*
209.7 ± 44.5*
8
133.9 ± 9.0*
187.1 ±  44.6
252 ±  6.5*
70.4 ± 3.3*
237.8 ± 43.1*
9
60.0 ± 5.2*
139.5 ±  1.1
154 ± 6.3*
12.2 ± 0.22
314.4 ± 15.8
13
106.1 ± 4.4*
523.8 ± 20.4*
322  ±  21.0*
181.5 ± 29.8*
697  ±  187.0*
15
110.0 ± 15.8*
435.78 ± 82.0*
434.5 ±  23.3*
244.1 ± 78.0*
478.6 ± 44.7*
Reference compound
Ascorbic acid
DMTU
Pyruvate
NDGA
GSH
278.6 ±  16.7
131.5 ± 3.6
32.2 ±  1.7
11.6 ± 0.13
471  ± 77
Data represent the mean ± SE of the three independent assays. The results were analyzed by ANOVA. The Dunnet’s multiple comparison test was used to compare outcomes between experimental and control group.*P < 0.05 versus reference compound.Figure 2
ROS scavenging capacity ofH. inuloides metabolites and semisynthetic derivatives. C=NDGA (superoxide); pyruvate (H2O2); DMTU (OH-); GSH (1O2); ascorbic Ac. acid (HOCl). The results were analyzed by ANOVA. The Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison test was used to compare outcomes between experimental and control group. *P<0.05.The hypochlorous acid scavenging capability decreases in the following order9 >7 >2 >13 >15 >8 >3 >4. Compound9 showed to possess the higher scavenging ability against HOCl. Compounds13 and15, acetylated derivatives of compounds1 and2, displayed a reduction in radical scavenging ability, with an increase in the IC50 value. The standard ascorbic acid showed an IC50 value of 278.6±16.7 μM.In the case of hydroxyl radical, the capacity to scavenging decreased in the following order:2 >9 >7 >8 >15 >13 >3 >4. The IC50 value for the dimethylthiourea used as reference substance was 131.5±3.6μM and was lower than those of the compounds tested.H. inuloides metabolites were capable of scavenging hydrogen peroxide in an amount-dependent manner. Results showed that the scavenging activity values decreased in the order of9 >7 >8 >2 >13 >3 >15 >4. Compound9 showed the best scavenging ability with an IC50 of 154±6.3 μM; however, none of the compounds showed higher activity than the pyruvate used as reference substance whose IC50 was 32.2±1.7 μM.The superoxide scavenger capacity decreased in the following order:9 >7 >8 >3 >2 >4 >13 >15. Compound9 showed to possess the best ability to trap superoxide radical with IC50 value of 12.2±0.22 μM; however, it is not statistically different from NDGA reference compound whose IC50 was 11.6±0.13 μM.With respect to the singlet oxygen scavenger capacity the ability of the compounds to trap the singlet oxygen decreased in the following order4 >7 >8 >9 >15 >3 >13 >2. The calamenoic acid (4) showed comparatively better activity than the GHS. The IC50 values (Table 2) of calamenoic acid and GHS were 112.4±29.3 μM y 471±77 μM.


### 3.2. Evaluation of Anti-Inflammatory Effect

The results show that only the compounds2,4 and16 displayed a significant anti-inflammatory activity, but this was less than that of indomethacin used as reference drug. The rest of the compounds showed a percentage of inhibition lower than 50%. (Table 3).Table 3
Anti-inflammatory activities of additionalH. inuloides metabolites.
Compound(1 μmol/ear)
Edema
%
(mg, average SE)
Inhibition
Negative control
12.07
—
1
10.50 ± 0.99
5.41
2
1.85 ± 0.52
83.33**
4
5.27 ± 0.70
65.73**
5
9.80 ± 0.36
7.98
7
7.30  ±  1.15
38.86**
9
7.57  ±  0.45
36.63**
13
11.87 ± 0.66
−11.42
14
11.07 ± 1.15
11.06
15
13.60  ±  0.70
−13.90
16
3.73  ±  1.62
66.44**
17
9.07 ± 0.70
19.46
18
13.17 ± 0.51
13.57
Indomethacin (0.31 μmol)
61.90**
The data represent the mean of three animals  ±  the standard error of the mean. All the compounds were tested at 1μmol/ear doses. The results were analyzed by ANOVA. Student’s t-test was used to compare outcomes between experimental and control groups. *P < 0.05 versus reference drug.


### 3.3. Life Span Assay

Exposure ofC. elegans to compounds gave the following results: at 100 μM flavonoids type compounds extended half-life compared to the control (Table 4). Significant differences were observed for treatments compared with the vehicle-treated control (P<0.001). The survival curve exhibited significant difference among worms fed with flavonoid compounds. There was not an increase in lifespan of the worm in the presence of cadinane compounds and some of them decreased survival as shown in Figure 3.Table 4
Summary ofCaenorhabditis elegans life span.
Treatment
Adult life span, 20°C
(n)
P versus control
Mean
CI 95%
(Log-rank)
1
1
0.171–1.962
449
<0.0001
2
1
0.169–1.964
479
<0.0001
3
13.661
13.13–14.209
513
<0.0001
4
14.391
13.776–15.006
557
0.1175
6
19.2
18.41–19.82
444
<0.0001
7
16.991
16.387–17.596
470
<0.0001
8
16.583
15.926–17.239
575
<0.0001
9
17.74
17.04–18.44
466
<0.0001
13
11.012
10.414–11.609
434
0.0080
14
13.424
12.845–14.003
531
0.0001
15
11.659
11.103–12.215
499
0.0150
16
13.520
12.917–14.123
496
0.0001
17
15.216
14.478–15.955
499
0.1751
Control
14.943
14.471–15.414
1098Lifespan survival curves in the presenceH. inuloides metabolites. Labels denote the compound used (100 μM). Curve (a) flavonoids, curves (b), (c), and (d) natural and semisynthetic cadinane type compounds.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.1. Antioxidant Effects and ROS Scavenging

Our results showed that only compounds2,6, and9 displayed the ability to reduce DPPH radical with a IC50 of 30.66±8.14 μM, 13.11±1.2 μM, and 6.97±0.14 μM. Compounds1 and7 showed slight activity with IC50 higher than 100 μM. The other compounds tested showed a rate of antioxidant capacity less than 25% during the preliminary screening and therefore were not considered active (Table 1).Table 1
Capacity to inhibit lipid peroxidation and to reduce the DPPH radical.
Compound
IC50 μM
Lipid peroxidation
Reduction of DPPH
1
4.72 ± 0.11
>100
2
3.09 ± 0.19
30.66 ± 8.14
3
nd*
nd
4
nd
nd
6
4.30 ± 0.27
13.11 ± 1.2
7
6.16 ± 0.06
>100
8
nd
nd
9
14.46 ± 0.61
6.97 ± 0.14
11
17.35 ± 1.40
nd
12
nd
—
13
1.82 ± 0.12
nd
14
>100
nd
15
>100
nd
16
>100
nd
17
3.67 ± 0.43
—
18
0.58 ± 0.008
nd
α-Tocopherol
6.78  ±  2.16
31.74 ± 1
*Not determined: at the concentrations tested the activity of compounds was low.In peroxidation assay some compounds showed ability to inhibit this process. The inhibitory capacity of these compounds decreased in the following order:18 >13 >2 >17 >6>1>7>9 >11. Compound18 had an IC50 of 0.58±0.008 μM and showed to possess greater ability to inhibit lipid peroxidation than α-tocopherol used as reference substance whose IC50 was 6.78±2.16 μM. The derivatives14,15, and16 showed little ability to inhibit lipid peroxidation with IC50 higher than 100 μM.TheH. inuloides natural products, derivatives as well as the reference compounds, displayed O2-, HOCl, H2O2, 1O2, and OH∙ scavenging activity in a concentration-dependent way. The IC50 values were calculated from the dose-response curve (Table 2, Figure 2).Table 2
Scavenging capacity ofH. inuloidesmetabolites on hypochlorous acid, hydroxyl radical, peroxide, superoxide anion, and singlet oxygen (IC50).
Compound
Scavenging capacity IC50 μM
HOCl
OH•
H2O2
O
2
-
1O2
2
69.1 ± 8.8*
133.4 ± 32.6
270 ± 2.7*
114.6 ± 13.9*
880.4 ± 55.4*
3
202.3 ± 21.9*
545.4 ±  23.0*
422 ± 8.0*
105 ± 7.2*
538.9 ± 58.6
4
203.5 ± 23.9*
607.9 ±  33.5*
536 ± 14*
148 ± 13.0*
112.4 ± 29.3*
7
68.1 ± 5.77*
161.2 ±  27.2
201 ± 6.7*
20 ± 0.27*
209.7 ± 44.5*
8
133.9 ± 9.0*
187.1 ±  44.6
252 ±  6.5*
70.4 ± 3.3*
237.8 ± 43.1*
9
60.0 ± 5.2*
139.5 ±  1.1
154 ± 6.3*
12.2 ± 0.22
314.4 ± 15.8
13
106.1 ± 4.4*
523.8 ± 20.4*
322  ±  21.0*
181.5 ± 29.8*
697  ±  187.0*
15
110.0 ± 15.8*
435.78 ± 82.0*
434.5 ±  23.3*
244.1 ± 78.0*
478.6 ± 44.7*
Reference compound
Ascorbic acid
DMTU
Pyruvate
NDGA
GSH
278.6 ±  16.7
131.5 ± 3.6
32.2 ±  1.7
11.6 ± 0.13
471  ± 77
Data represent the mean ± SE of the three independent assays. The results were analyzed by ANOVA. The Dunnet’s multiple comparison test was used to compare outcomes between experimental and control group.*P < 0.05 versus reference compound.Figure 2
ROS scavenging capacity ofH. inuloides metabolites and semisynthetic derivatives. C=NDGA (superoxide); pyruvate (H2O2); DMTU (OH-); GSH (1O2); ascorbic Ac. acid (HOCl). The results were analyzed by ANOVA. The Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison test was used to compare outcomes between experimental and control group. *P<0.05.The hypochlorous acid scavenging capability decreases in the following order9 >7 >2 >13 >15 >8 >3 >4. Compound9 showed to possess the higher scavenging ability against HOCl. Compounds13 and15, acetylated derivatives of compounds1 and2, displayed a reduction in radical scavenging ability, with an increase in the IC50 value. The standard ascorbic acid showed an IC50 value of 278.6±16.7 μM.In the case of hydroxyl radical, the capacity to scavenging decreased in the following order:2 >9 >7 >8 >15 >13 >3 >4. The IC50 value for the dimethylthiourea used as reference substance was 131.5±3.6μM and was lower than those of the compounds tested.H. inuloides metabolites were capable of scavenging hydrogen peroxide in an amount-dependent manner. Results showed that the scavenging activity values decreased in the order of9 >7 >8 >2 >13 >3 >15 >4. Compound9 showed the best scavenging ability with an IC50 of 154±6.3 μM; however, none of the compounds showed higher activity than the pyruvate used as reference substance whose IC50 was 32.2±1.7 μM.The superoxide scavenger capacity decreased in the following order:9 >7 >8 >3 >2 >4 >13 >15. Compound9 showed to possess the best ability to trap superoxide radical with IC50 value of 12.2±0.22 μM; however, it is not statistically different from NDGA reference compound whose IC50 was 11.6±0.13 μM.With respect to the singlet oxygen scavenger capacity the ability of the compounds to trap the singlet oxygen decreased in the following order4 >7 >8 >9 >15 >3 >13 >2. The calamenoic acid (4) showed comparatively better activity than the GHS. The IC50 values (Table 2) of calamenoic acid and GHS were 112.4±29.3 μM y 471±77 μM.


## 3.2. Evaluation of Anti-Inflammatory Effect

The results show that only the compounds2,4 and16 displayed a significant anti-inflammatory activity, but this was less than that of indomethacin used as reference drug. The rest of the compounds showed a percentage of inhibition lower than 50%. (Table 3).Table 3
Anti-inflammatory activities of additionalH. inuloides metabolites.
Compound(1 μmol/ear)
Edema
%
(mg, average SE)
Inhibition
Negative control
12.07
—
1
10.50 ± 0.99
5.41
2
1.85 ± 0.52
83.33**
4
5.27 ± 0.70
65.73**
5
9.80 ± 0.36
7.98
7
7.30  ±  1.15
38.86**
9
7.57  ±  0.45
36.63**
13
11.87 ± 0.66
−11.42
14
11.07 ± 1.15
11.06
15
13.60  ±  0.70
−13.90
16
3.73  ±  1.62
66.44**
17
9.07 ± 0.70
19.46
18
13.17 ± 0.51
13.57
Indomethacin (0.31 μmol)
61.90**
The data represent the mean of three animals  ±  the standard error of the mean. All the compounds were tested at 1μmol/ear doses. The results were analyzed by ANOVA. Student’s t-test was used to compare outcomes between experimental and control groups. *P < 0.05 versus reference drug.


## 3.3. Life Span Assay

Exposure ofC. elegans to compounds gave the following results: at 100 μM flavonoids type compounds extended half-life compared to the control (Table 4). Significant differences were observed for treatments compared with the vehicle-treated control (P<0.001). The survival curve exhibited significant difference among worms fed with flavonoid compounds. There was not an increase in lifespan of the worm in the presence of cadinane compounds and some of them decreased survival as shown in Figure 3.Table 4
Summary ofCaenorhabditis elegans life span.
Treatment
Adult life span, 20°C
(n)
P versus control
Mean
CI 95%
(Log-rank)
1
1
0.171–1.962
449
<0.0001
2
1
0.169–1.964
479
<0.0001
3
13.661
13.13–14.209
513
<0.0001
4
14.391
13.776–15.006
557
0.1175
6
19.2
18.41–19.82
444
<0.0001
7
16.991
16.387–17.596
470
<0.0001
8
16.583
15.926–17.239
575
<0.0001
9
17.74
17.04–18.44
466
<0.0001
13
11.012
10.414–11.609
434
0.0080
14
13.424
12.845–14.003
531
0.0001
15
11.659
11.103–12.215
499
0.0150
16
13.520
12.917–14.123
496
0.0001
17
15.216
14.478–15.955
499
0.1751
Control
14.943
14.471–15.414
1098Lifespan survival curves in the presenceH. inuloides metabolites. Labels denote the compound used (100 μM). Curve (a) flavonoids, curves (b), (c), and (d) natural and semisynthetic cadinane type compounds.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 4. Discussion

H. inuloides metabolites showed to possess the ability to inhibit lipid peroxidation and scavenging free radicals and ROS. In lipid peroxidation assay we observed that the replacement of H at the hydroxyl in position 7 of sesquiterpenes1 and2 led to a decrease in the activity. It is further noted that the increase in the unsaturation of cadinanes led to a decrease in their activity, which is observed for compound18 whose activity is greater than1 that is greater than2. In the case of flavonoid type compounds,6 (quercetin) had the best ability to inhibit lipid peroxidation; natural methoxy derivatives7 and8 showed lower activity. These results are consistent with those reported that indicate that methoxy substituent perturbs the planarity due to steric hindrance imparted by the methyl group [36]. It is reported that the antioxidant activity of flavonoids is proportional to the number of hydroxyl groups present in the molecule [37]. Compound6 (quercetin) having a 3,5,7,3′,4′-pentahydroxy group showed DPPH radical scavenging activity. Compounds1 and2 showed a statistically similar activity to6 and higher than that of α-tocopherol. We noted that several tested compounds had the ability to inhibit lipid peroxidation; however, few of them reduced the DPPH radical. The above observations may be explained because the DPPH radical has a long life, and no resemblance to the highly reactive peroxyl radicals involved in lipid peroxidation, and some antioxidants that react quickly with peroxyl radicals react slowly or are inert to DPPH [38].Hypochlorous acid radicals have the ability to inactivate the antioxidant enzyme catalase through degrade its heme group [33]. Catalase inactivation is inhibited in the presence of someH. inuloides compounds. The results showed that compounds are more efficient scavenger than the standard ascorbic acid. Among the flavonoid type compounds,9 showed the highest ability to scavenge hypochlorous acid while7 and8 showed lower activity. In the last two compounds the hydroxyl at position 3, present in the quercetin molecule has been replaced by a methoxy group. It has been reported that the hydroxyl at position 3 of the C ring of quercetin plays an important role in the antioxidant activity including scavenging hypochlorite [39].Hydroxyl free radicals cause damage to oxidative cells trough damage DNA, lipids, and proteins [31]. The flavonoids scavenge hydroxyl (OH∙) radicals. Hydroxyl radical (OH∙) generated by the Fenton reaction system was evaluated by TBARS assay. We observed that compound9 was more active than7, which in turn was more active than8, with only one hydroxyl group. The results obtained are consistent with reports indicating that the scavenging activity of flavonoids increases with the number of free hydroxyl groups, and it is independent of the presence of double bond between C-2 and C-3 of ring C [40].In biological systems H2O2 produces hydroxyl ions and hydroxyl radicals by reacting with Fe2+ and Cu2+ ions and they have been related to the initiation of many toxic effects [41]. It is therefore biologically advantageous for cells to control the accumulation of H2O2.H. inuloides metabolites showed ability to trap peroxide; however, they were no better than pyruvate.The superoxide radical is a highly reactive species and not readily diffuses through the cell. Because the main production site ofO2- is the inner mitochondrial membrane, it has been proposed that mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is the main target of damage [42]. We noted that compounds9 and7 have the capacity to scavenging superoxide. It has been reported that the superoxide scavenging capacity of flavonoids is dependent on the number of hydroxyl groups in the B ring, on the presence of a free hydroxyl group at C3, on the presence of a saturated C2-C3 bond, and the absence of a C4 carbonyl group [43]. Also it has been reported that the number of conjugated double bonds and the presence of conjugated keto groups increase the quenching rate, while the presence of a hydroxyl, epoxy, and methoxy group has lesser effects [44]. Cadinane type compound4 and flavonoid9 showed the best ability to scavenge the singlet oxygen 1O2; other flavonoid type compounds showed lesser activity. The 1O2 scavenger activity of flavonoids is associated with the presence of a catechol moiety on ring B and with the presence of a hydroxyl group activating the double bond on C ring [45]. The cadinane type sesquiterpenes showed capacity to trap singlet oxygen greater than glutathione. In another study the ability of 7-hydroxy-3,4-dihydrocadalene to trap this species has been reported [46].Preparations fromH. inuloides are used as anti-inflammatory and analgesic agents in Mexican traditional medicine, and these properties have been investigated in several studies [13, 47, 48]. The results of anti-inflammatory assay activity showed that acetylation of compounds1 and2 to the corresponding derivatives13 and15, respectively, generated a change in biological response, since these derivatives exhibited proinflammatory activity. However, the benzoyl derivatives14and16 (obtained from1 and2) resulted in opposite effects. Compound14 increased the anti-inflammatory activity with respect to1, while compound16displayed less activity in comparison with2. It has previously been reported that quercetin (6) showed anti-inflammatory capacity in the mice ear edema test [13]; in this study it was observed that naturally methylated derivative7 and semisynthetic acetylated derivative17 displayed little activity in this assay (see Table 3).We evaluated the effect of some natural products isolated fromH. inuloides and derivatives in extension of life ofC. elegans nematode (Figure 3). Treatment ofC. elegans with someH. inuloides metabolites prolonged the lifespan of the worm and the best effects were obtained with flavonoid type compounds. The results are consistent with other studies conducted wherein it has been reported that certain compounds of flavonoid type increase lifespan ofC. elegans, which protect against oxidative stress and cause an increase in the translocation of the transcription factor DAF-16 [49]. In another study it was observed that blueberry polyphenols increased lifespan and slowed aging related decline inC. elegans, but these benefits did not just reflect antioxidant activity [50]. Similarly, results of Wilson et al. [51] showed that the prolongevity effect of myricetin is dependent on DAF-16 and not on direct antioxidative effects of the flavonoid. Büchter et al. [52] observed that quercetin significantly increased reproductive capacity ofC. elegans and enlarged the body size, whereas no modification of these characteristics was induced by their methylated derivatives, isorhamnetin, and tamarixetin. Certain cadinane type compounds isolated fromH. inuloides have shown to possess antioxidant activity, but its antioxidant capacity was not reflected in an increase in the life span ofC. elegans. Although several compounds isolated fromH. inuloides have antiantigiardial activity [21] and it has been found that structurally similar compounds showed activity againstLeishmania chagasi promastigotes [53].


## 5. Conclusions

In the present paper, we have shown thatH. inuloides metabolites in vitro scavenged to O2-, HOCl, H2O2, OH∙, and 1O2 in a concentration-dependent way. The IC50 in some cases were comparable to the reference compound. These observations suggest that metabolites ofH. inuloides have the ability to capture free radicals. The results of the anti-inflammatory assay of the natural products and some derivatives showed both anti- and proinflammatory effects, depending on the functionalization of the OH- groups. We have found that antioxidant capacities are not predictive ofC. elegans lifespan benefits. Even where a life span extension and antioxidant effect were observed, it appears that other factors are also likely to be involved in modulating lifespan.



---

*Source: 843237-2015-03-02.xml*