# Clinical Characteristics ofNocardia Infection in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases

Authors: Mieko Yamagata; Koichi Hirose; Kei Ikeda; Hiroshi Nakajima
Journal: Clinical and Developmental Immunology
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

AlthoughNocardiosis has considerable recurrence and mortality rates, characteristics and risk factors of Nocardia infection have not been assessed in patients with rheumatic diseases. Here, we examined the characteristics and risk factors of Nocardia infection in rheumatic disease patients in our hospital. Ten rheumatic disease patients who developed Nocardia infection were identified by retrospectively reviewing the medical records. Possible predisposing factors for Nocardia infection were high-dose glucocorticoid treatment, concomitant use of immunosuppressants, preexisting pulmonary diseases, and diabetes mellitus. All patients had pulmonary Nocardiosis, and six of them had disseminated Nocardiosis when their pulmonary lesions were identified.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Nocardia species are ubiquitous environmental microorganisms which belong to a diverse group of bacteria known as aerobic actinomycetes [1]. More than 50 species of Nocardia have been identified, and at least 30 species of them have been reported to possess clinical significance [1]. The majority of Nocardia infections are caused by inhalation, which develops lung lesions called pulmonary Nocardiosis, while some infections are caused by traumatic percutaneous inoculation [2]. Nocardia species can spread from these primary infection sites to various organs hematogenously and develop a pathogenic condition called disseminated Nocardiosis.Nocardia infection mainly occurs in immunocompromised hosts, including patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus(HIV) infection, those who underwent organ transplantation, and those who received long-term corticosteroid therapy [3]. Although the incidence of Nocardia infection is low, its early detection and treatment in patients at high risk are clinically important due to its high mortality rate [4, 5]. Therefore, it is desired to identify the risk factors and clinical characteristics of Nocardia infection in each clinical cohort of immunocompromised hosts. In patients who are organ transplantation recipients or are infected with HIV, administration of high-dose corticosteroids, a history of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, and low CD4+ T-cell counts in peripheral blood have been reported as risk factors forNocardia infection [6, 7]. Although case reports of Nocardia infection in patients with rheumatic diseases underscore its importance [8–10], the risk factors for Nocardia infection in patients with rheumatic diseases have not been assessed yet. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of our hospital and assessed the risk factors, clinical features, and microbial characteristics of Nocardia infection in patients with rheumatic diseases.


## 2. Methods

### 2.1. Patients

Rheumatic disease patients who developed culture-provenNocardiainfection from January 1995 to July 2012 were retrospectively identified by reviewing medical records in the Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Chiba University Hospital, and clinical information was collected from the records. DisseminatedNocardia infection was defined as involvement of 2 or more organs.


### 2.2. Microbiology

Nocardia species were identified based on colonial and microscopic morphology and on the demonstration of partial acid-fast staining at the Microbiology Department in Chiba University Hospital.


## 2.1. Patients

Rheumatic disease patients who developed culture-provenNocardiainfection from January 1995 to July 2012 were retrospectively identified by reviewing medical records in the Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Chiba University Hospital, and clinical information was collected from the records. DisseminatedNocardia infection was defined as involvement of 2 or more organs.


## 2.2. Microbiology

Nocardia species were identified based on colonial and microscopic morphology and on the demonstration of partial acid-fast staining at the Microbiology Department in Chiba University Hospital.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Clinical Features of Rheumatic Disease Patients Who Were Diagnosed withNocardia Infection

The demographics and characteristics of 10 rheumatic disease patients who were diagnosed withNocardia infection are shown in Table 1. The underlying rheumatic diseases of the patients were as follows: microscopic polyangiitis (n=3), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (n=2), Behçet’s disease (n=1), Sjögren’s syndrome (n=1), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (n=1), adult-onset Still’s disease (n=1), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with vasculitis (n=1). The mean time to develop Nocardia infection after the diagnosis of rheumatic diseases was more than 7 years, and 4 patients developed Nocardia infection more than 10 years after the onset of rheumatic diseases (Table 1).Table 1
Demographics and characteristics of 10 rheumatic disease patients withNocardia infection.
Case no.
Sex
Age
Underlying rheumatic disease
Treatment periods for rheumatic disease (years)
Doses of prednisolone (mg/day)
Other immunosuppressant
TMP-SMZ prophylaxis
1
M
70
Behçet’s disease
>10
20
No
2
F
50
SLE
7
27.5
AZT
No
3
M
79
Sjögren’s syndrome
1
20
No
4
F
77
Granulomatosis with polyangiitis
9
15
No
5
F
60
Adult-onset Still’s disease
0.3
30
CyA
No
6
M
74
Microscopic polyangiitis
>10
4.5
AZT
Yes
7
F
67
SLE
>10
15
No
8
F
40
Microscopic polyangiitis
7
22.5
IVCY
No
9
M
69
Microscopic polyangiitis
5
25
No
10
M
62
RA with vasculitis
>10
17.5
AZT
No
SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; AZT: azathioprine; CyA: cyclosporine; IVCY: intravenous administration of cyclophosphamide; TMP-SMZ: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.The mean glucocorticoid dose at the onset ofNocardia infection was 19.7 mg (prednisolone equivalent)/day. Five patients were also receiving other immunosuppressants: azathioprine (n=3), cyclosporine (n=1), and intravenous administration of cyclophosphamide (n=1) (Table 1). Although the association of anti-TNF therapy with Nocardiosis has been suggested [11, 12], none of our patients with Nocardia infection were receiving anti-TNF therapy. One patient developed Nocardia infection even though the patient was taking Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ), the most commonly used antibiotics against Nocardia, for prophylaxis against pneumocystis jiroveci (Table 1).Eight out of the 10 patients had diabetes mellitus, and 4 patients were poorly controlled (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] < 7.0%) (Table2). Seven out of the 10 patients had pulmonary diseases including pulmonary lesions induced by underlying rheumatic diseases, a history of pulmonary tuberculosis, and pulmonary aspergillosis (Table 2). In contrast to the previous reports suggesting the association between Nocardia infection and lymphocytopenia [13, 14], white blood cell (WBC) counts and lymphocyte counts in peripheral blood in our patients were within normal limits (Table 2). In addition, no patients had severe hypogammaglobulinemia or hypoalbuminemia. These results suggest that treatment with high-dose glucocorticoid, concurrent use of immunosuppressants, and preexisting pulmonary diseases are associated with the development of Nocardia infection in patents with rheumatic diseases, which is consistent with the previous report on the patients with organ transplantation [6], and that the presence of diabetes mellitus further increases the risk of Nocardia infection in patients with rheumatic diseases.Table 2
Comorbidities and clinical data of rheumatic disease patients withNocardia infection.
Case no.
Pulmonary disease
Diabetes mellitus
HbA1c (%)
WBC (/μL)
Lymphocyte (/μL)
Alb (g/dL)
IgG (mg/dL)
1
Bronchial asthma
Yes
8.0
12400
409
2.7
705
2
No
No
4.5
8000
646
3.7
1111
3
Pulmonary tuberculosis
Yes
10.9
19600
585
3.6
1080
4
Interstitial pneumonitis
Yes
7.8
15100
1216
3.1
684
5
No
Yes
6.5
10400
1605
3.7
738
6
Pulmonary aspergillosis, Pulmonary tuberculosis
Yes
6.8
12200
1159
3.8
1451
7
No
Yes
6.7
9800
510
3.7
1083
8
No
No
6.2
13100
550
3.8
880
9
Pulmonary tuberculosis
Yes
9.6
17100
684
3.0
740
10
Interstitial pneumonitis
Yes
6.8
9100
536
3.7
789
WBC: white blood cell; Alb: albumin.


### 3.2. Characteristics ofNocardia Infection in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases

The strains ofNocardia species isolated from the patients with rheumatic diseases are shown in Table 3. N. farcinica was the most common species in our patients (n=5). All patients were diagnosed in outpatient settings and had pulmonary Nocardiosis. Importantly, intensive examination revealed that 6 out of the 10 patients had disseminated diseases (brain abscess (n=3), multiple muscle abscess (n=1), mediastinum abscess (n=1), and subcutaneous abscess (n=1)) when their lung lesions were detected (Table 3).Table 3
Characteristics ofNocardia infection developed in rheumatic disease patients.
Case no.
Nocardia spp
Pulmonary nocardiosis
Extrapulmonary lesion
Initial therapy
Outcome
1
N. asteroides
Yes
Mediastinal abscess
IMP/CS + MINO + TMP-SMZ
Remission
2
N.D.
Yes
Brain abscess
PAPM/BP + CLDM + TMP-SMZ
Remission
3
N. farcinica
Yes
Iliopsoas abscess
MEPM
Remission
4
N. nova
Yes
Brain abscess
MEPM + TMP-SMZ
Remission
5
N. farcinica
Yes
No
MEPM + ABK
Remission
6
N. farcinica
Yes
No
MEPM
Recurrence
7
N.D.
Yes
Brain abscess
IMP/CS
Remission
8
N.D.
Yes
No
TMP-SMZ
Remission
9
N. farcinica
Yes
No
MEPM
Remission
10
N. farcinica
Yes
Subcutaneous abscess
TMP-SMZ
Remission
N.D.: not determined; IMP/CS: imipenem/cilastatin sodium; MINO: minomycin; TMP-SMZ: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.
PAPM/BP: panipenem-betamipron; CLDM: clindamycin; MEPM: meropenem; ABK: arbekacin.It has been reported that carbapenem monotherapy or its combination with amikacin was well tolerated and effective for severeNocardiosis [15]. Considering the immunocompromised state of our patients, 8 patients including 6 patients with disseminated diseases were treated with regimens containing intravenous administration of carbapenem antibiotics as an induction therapy (Table 3). All patients received the induction therapy for 8 to 12 weeks, followed by long-term treatment with oral TMP-SMZ as previously recommended [16]. Four patients failed to continue to take TMP-SMZ because of renal dysfunction or drug allergy and received substitution therapies such as long-term treatment with minocycline or quinolone antibacterial agents. Consequently, 9 patients including 6 patients with disseminated diseases achieved remission and had no recurrence of Nocardia infection (Table 3). One case of pulmonary Nocardiosis with severe interstitial pneumonitis associated with microscopic polyangiitis suffered from several recurrences in spite of the treatment with oral antibiotics (Table 3). Importantly, N. farcinica isolated from this patient gradually changed their susceptibility to antibiotics and finally acquired resistance to TMP-SMZ.


## 3.1. Clinical Features of Rheumatic Disease Patients Who Were Diagnosed withNocardia Infection

The demographics and characteristics of 10 rheumatic disease patients who were diagnosed withNocardia infection are shown in Table 1. The underlying rheumatic diseases of the patients were as follows: microscopic polyangiitis (n=3), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (n=2), Behçet’s disease (n=1), Sjögren’s syndrome (n=1), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (n=1), adult-onset Still’s disease (n=1), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with vasculitis (n=1). The mean time to develop Nocardia infection after the diagnosis of rheumatic diseases was more than 7 years, and 4 patients developed Nocardia infection more than 10 years after the onset of rheumatic diseases (Table 1).Table 1
Demographics and characteristics of 10 rheumatic disease patients withNocardia infection.
Case no.
Sex
Age
Underlying rheumatic disease
Treatment periods for rheumatic disease (years)
Doses of prednisolone (mg/day)
Other immunosuppressant
TMP-SMZ prophylaxis
1
M
70
Behçet’s disease
>10
20
No
2
F
50
SLE
7
27.5
AZT
No
3
M
79
Sjögren’s syndrome
1
20
No
4
F
77
Granulomatosis with polyangiitis
9
15
No
5
F
60
Adult-onset Still’s disease
0.3
30
CyA
No
6
M
74
Microscopic polyangiitis
>10
4.5
AZT
Yes
7
F
67
SLE
>10
15
No
8
F
40
Microscopic polyangiitis
7
22.5
IVCY
No
9
M
69
Microscopic polyangiitis
5
25
No
10
M
62
RA with vasculitis
>10
17.5
AZT
No
SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; AZT: azathioprine; CyA: cyclosporine; IVCY: intravenous administration of cyclophosphamide; TMP-SMZ: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.The mean glucocorticoid dose at the onset ofNocardia infection was 19.7 mg (prednisolone equivalent)/day. Five patients were also receiving other immunosuppressants: azathioprine (n=3), cyclosporine (n=1), and intravenous administration of cyclophosphamide (n=1) (Table 1). Although the association of anti-TNF therapy with Nocardiosis has been suggested [11, 12], none of our patients with Nocardia infection were receiving anti-TNF therapy. One patient developed Nocardia infection even though the patient was taking Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ), the most commonly used antibiotics against Nocardia, for prophylaxis against pneumocystis jiroveci (Table 1).Eight out of the 10 patients had diabetes mellitus, and 4 patients were poorly controlled (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] < 7.0%) (Table2). Seven out of the 10 patients had pulmonary diseases including pulmonary lesions induced by underlying rheumatic diseases, a history of pulmonary tuberculosis, and pulmonary aspergillosis (Table 2). In contrast to the previous reports suggesting the association between Nocardia infection and lymphocytopenia [13, 14], white blood cell (WBC) counts and lymphocyte counts in peripheral blood in our patients were within normal limits (Table 2). In addition, no patients had severe hypogammaglobulinemia or hypoalbuminemia. These results suggest that treatment with high-dose glucocorticoid, concurrent use of immunosuppressants, and preexisting pulmonary diseases are associated with the development of Nocardia infection in patents with rheumatic diseases, which is consistent with the previous report on the patients with organ transplantation [6], and that the presence of diabetes mellitus further increases the risk of Nocardia infection in patients with rheumatic diseases.Table 2
Comorbidities and clinical data of rheumatic disease patients withNocardia infection.
Case no.
Pulmonary disease
Diabetes mellitus
HbA1c (%)
WBC (/μL)
Lymphocyte (/μL)
Alb (g/dL)
IgG (mg/dL)
1
Bronchial asthma
Yes
8.0
12400
409
2.7
705
2
No
No
4.5
8000
646
3.7
1111
3
Pulmonary tuberculosis
Yes
10.9
19600
585
3.6
1080
4
Interstitial pneumonitis
Yes
7.8
15100
1216
3.1
684
5
No
Yes
6.5
10400
1605
3.7
738
6
Pulmonary aspergillosis, Pulmonary tuberculosis
Yes
6.8
12200
1159
3.8
1451
7
No
Yes
6.7
9800
510
3.7
1083
8
No
No
6.2
13100
550
3.8
880
9
Pulmonary tuberculosis
Yes
9.6
17100
684
3.0
740
10
Interstitial pneumonitis
Yes
6.8
9100
536
3.7
789
WBC: white blood cell; Alb: albumin.


## 3.2. Characteristics ofNocardia Infection in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases

The strains ofNocardia species isolated from the patients with rheumatic diseases are shown in Table 3. N. farcinica was the most common species in our patients (n=5). All patients were diagnosed in outpatient settings and had pulmonary Nocardiosis. Importantly, intensive examination revealed that 6 out of the 10 patients had disseminated diseases (brain abscess (n=3), multiple muscle abscess (n=1), mediastinum abscess (n=1), and subcutaneous abscess (n=1)) when their lung lesions were detected (Table 3).Table 3
Characteristics ofNocardia infection developed in rheumatic disease patients.
Case no.
Nocardia spp
Pulmonary nocardiosis
Extrapulmonary lesion
Initial therapy
Outcome
1
N. asteroides
Yes
Mediastinal abscess
IMP/CS + MINO + TMP-SMZ
Remission
2
N.D.
Yes
Brain abscess
PAPM/BP + CLDM + TMP-SMZ
Remission
3
N. farcinica
Yes
Iliopsoas abscess
MEPM
Remission
4
N. nova
Yes
Brain abscess
MEPM + TMP-SMZ
Remission
5
N. farcinica
Yes
No
MEPM + ABK
Remission
6
N. farcinica
Yes
No
MEPM
Recurrence
7
N.D.
Yes
Brain abscess
IMP/CS
Remission
8
N.D.
Yes
No
TMP-SMZ
Remission
9
N. farcinica
Yes
No
MEPM
Remission
10
N. farcinica
Yes
Subcutaneous abscess
TMP-SMZ
Remission
N.D.: not determined; IMP/CS: imipenem/cilastatin sodium; MINO: minomycin; TMP-SMZ: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.
PAPM/BP: panipenem-betamipron; CLDM: clindamycin; MEPM: meropenem; ABK: arbekacin.It has been reported that carbapenem monotherapy or its combination with amikacin was well tolerated and effective for severeNocardiosis [15]. Considering the immunocompromised state of our patients, 8 patients including 6 patients with disseminated diseases were treated with regimens containing intravenous administration of carbapenem antibiotics as an induction therapy (Table 3). All patients received the induction therapy for 8 to 12 weeks, followed by long-term treatment with oral TMP-SMZ as previously recommended [16]. Four patients failed to continue to take TMP-SMZ because of renal dysfunction or drug allergy and received substitution therapies such as long-term treatment with minocycline or quinolone antibacterial agents. Consequently, 9 patients including 6 patients with disseminated diseases achieved remission and had no recurrence of Nocardia infection (Table 3). One case of pulmonary Nocardiosis with severe interstitial pneumonitis associated with microscopic polyangiitis suffered from several recurrences in spite of the treatment with oral antibiotics (Table 3). Importantly, N. farcinica isolated from this patient gradually changed their susceptibility to antibiotics and finally acquired resistance to TMP-SMZ.


## 4. Discussion

Recent advances in immunosuppressive regimens against rheumatic diseases combined with antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies have led to significant alternation in the prevalence of opportunistic infections in patients with rheumatic diseases. Importantly, the introduction of antitumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α biologics has been shown to increase the incidence of granulomatous infections, including Nocardiosis [11, 12]. Furthermore, calcineurin inhibitors, a potential risk factor for Nocardia infection in organ transplant recipients [6], have become widely used for rheumatic diseases. To our knowledge, however, the risk factors and characteristics of Nocardia infection in patients with rheumatic diseases have not been reported.In this study, we showed that the administration of high-dose glucocorticoid and concurrent use of immunosuppressants seem to be risk factors forNocardia infection in patients with rheumatic diseases (Table 1) in consistency with the previous studies focusing on patients with organ transplantation or neoplastic diseases [6, 17]. In contrast to the previous reports which suggest the association of anti-TNF-α therapy with Nocardiosis [11, 12], we did not find any rheumatic disease patients who developed Nocardia infection under treatment with anti-TNF-α biologics in our small number of cases.In addition to these drugs used for the treatment of underlying rheumatic diseases, our data suggest that diabetes mellitus and preexisting pulmonary diseases are risk factors forNocardia infection in rheumatic disease patients. On the other hand, lymphocytopenia and CMV infection, which have been suggested to be associated with Nocardia infection in patients with organ transplantation or neoplastic diseases [6, 13, 14], were not identified in our patients with rheumatic diseases who developed Nocardia infection (Table 2) possibly due to the relatively low incidence of lymphocytopenia and CMV infection in these conditions [18, 19]. Taken together, these results suggest that the risk factors for development of Nocardia infection can be different in patients with rheumatic diseases compared to those with organ transplantation or neoplastic diseases presumably because of the differences in the preexisting immunological abnormalities and/or the therapy for underlying diseases. Further studies with larger sample size are needed to assess the detailed risk factors for Nocardiosis in patients with rheumatic diseases.Our results suggest that extrapulmonary lesions ofNocardia infection are frequently observed in patients with rheumatic diseases. We found that 6 out of the 10 patients had extrapulmonary abscesses when their pulmonary lesions were diagnosed (Table 3). Although it is well known that Nocardia species readily spread hematogenously, the proportion of disseminated Nocardia infection in our patients is higher than that in previous reports [6, 20]. At present, the reason for the high frequency of disseminated Nocardia infection in patients with rheumatic diseases is unknown. However, these results underscore the importance of the intensive examination for extrapulmonary lesions when the diagnosis of pulmonary Nocardia infection is made in patients with rheumatic diseases.


## 5. Conclusion

Our results suggest that the predisposing factors forNocardiosis in rheumatic disease patients are high-dose glucocorticoid therapy, concomitant use of immunosuppressants, preexisting pulmonary diseases, and diabetes mellitus. Our results also suggest that the intensive examination for extrapulmonary lesions is needed when the diagnosis of pulmonary Nocardia infection is made in patients with rheumatic diseases.



---

*Source: 818654-2013-09-19.xml*