# Structural and Functional Genomics of Tomato

Authors: Amalia Barone; Maria Luisa Chiusano; Maria Raffaella Ercolano; Giovanni Giuliano; Silvana Grandillo; Luigi Frusciante
Journal: International Journal of Plant Genomics
 (2008)

---

## Abstract

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is the most intensively investigated Solanaceous species both in genetic and genomics studies. It is a diploid species with a haploid set of 12 chromosomes and a small genome (950 Mb). Based on the detailed knowledge on tomato structural genomics, the sequencing of the euchromatic regions started in the year 2005 as a common effort of different countries.
The manuscript focuses on markers used for tomato, on mapping efforts mainly based on exploitation of natural biodiversity, and it gives an updated report on the international sequencing activities. The principal tools developed to explore the function of tomato genes are also summarized, including mutagenesis, genetic transformation, and transcriptome analysis. The current progress in bioinformatic strategies available to manage the overwhelming amount of data generated from different tomato “omics” approaches is reported, and emphasis is given to the effort of producing a computational workbench for the analysis of the organization, as well as the functionality and evolution of the Solanaceae family.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Tomato
(Solanum lycopersicum L., formerly Lycopersicon esculentum Miller) is an
economically important crop worldwide, and a preeminent model system for
genetic studies in plants. It is also the most intensively investigated Solanaceous
species, with simple diploid genetics, a short generation time, routine
transformation technology, and availability of rich genetic and genomic
resources. It has a diploid genome with 12 chromosome pairs and a genome size
of 950 Mb [1] encoding approximately 35,000 genes that are largely sequestered
in contiguous euchromatic regions [2]. Several resources are available for
genetic/genomic research in tomato including the following: (i) tomato wild
species and mutant collections; (ii) marker collections; (iii) F2 synteny mapping population and permanent recombinant inbred (RI) mapping
populations; (iv) BAC libraries and an advanced physical map; (v) TILLING
populations; and (vi) tomato microarrays, gene silenced tomato lines, and VIGS
libraries (for transient silencing).Till recently, tomato genomics has largely
relied on molecular marker analysis and functional analysis of gene-sets. However,
for a better understanding of structural and functional aspects of its genome,
following latest high-throughput technologies are also being utilized: (i) RNA transcription and protein analysis, (ii)
screening of posttranslational modifications and protein-protein interactions, and
(iii) discovery of metabolic networks. The information generated by large-scale
genome sequencing can lead a major revolution in the understanding of tomato
biology.The International Solanaceae Genome Project
(SOL) was established to develop a network of knowledge on the Solanaceae
family and to coordinate the research efforts of different groups from around
the world [3]. The Solanaceae Genomics
Network website (SGN; http://www.sgn.cornell.edu) was created
to facilitate distribution of genomic information for tomato in particular and
for Solanaceous species in general in a comparative genomic context [4]. The
challenge facing SOL in the coming years is to develop methodologies that will
enable genomic information to be associated with phenotypes of interest for crop
improvement. The framework for organizing these data is the highly conserved
genetic map of the Solanaceae that will allow the information basis to be
extended beyond individual species.Progress in tomato research will depend on our
ability to tie together the independent components into higher-order complexity
with multiple dimensions. Multidisciplinary research efforts, involving the
increased input of chemistry, physics, statistics, mathematics, and computing
sciences, are becoming increasingly crucial for the success of such approach.


## 2. Structural Genomics

### 2.1. Molecular Markers

Beginning in the 1980s, different types of
molecular markers have been developed in tomato. Among crop species, tomato is
one of the richest in the number and type of these genetic markers, including restriction
fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs), simple sequence repeats (SSRs), cleaved amplified
polymorphic sequence (CAPS), amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs),
and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). Chronologically, RFLPs were the
first markers developed. Currently, more than 1000 RFLPs have been mapped on
the 12 tomato chromosomes. A subset of RFLP markers has been converted into
PCR-based markers through sequencing of their ends. These sequences are
available from the SGN Database, thus allowing specific primers for PCR
reaction to be designed. Other PCR-based markers were developed both as random
markers, such as random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), AFLPs, and
locus-specific markers, such as SSRs, CAPS, and conserved ortholog sets (COSs);
and many of them have been mapped onto the high-density tomato genetic map [5].Given the huge number of markers that have been
set up for tomato using different methods, a database collecting the different
datasets is available at the SGN website. Indeed, all information for more than
15,000 markers is collected in the SGN [6], where a specific tool for “marker
search” allows markers to be located on the map. Markers can be searched by name,
chromosome position, mapping population, and BAC associations (if they have
been associated with BAC from the tomato sequencing project by hybridization
with overgo probes or computationally by BLAST comparisons). Some of them have
also been grouped into collections for organizational purposes or because they
are part of a particular project. So, it is possible to select either COS
(markers that have been mapped in both tomato and Arabidopsis) or COSII markers
(markers that have been mapped in several Asterid species, including several
Solanaceous species) [7, 8]. Other groups comprise known function genes
(KFG), or EST-derived (TM) markers.Recently, large-scale sequencing
work in tomato has been generating sequences of whole BAC and cloned genes,
ESTs collected from different cDNA libraries, and the sequences of full-length
cDNAs. The cataloguing of these sequences in public databases is providing
useful information to develop markers with high resolving power, such as SNPs
and InDels, thus initiating an era of in
silico tomato marker discovery. The tomato SSRs are an example of
genetic markers that can be mined from existing sequence data. Smulders et al.
[9], by screening the EMBL and GenBank Databases, identified 36 primer pairs,
which detected polymorphisms at or close to coding regions. In recent studies,
as many as 2627 SSRs were mined from an EST dataset by screening the 26,363 tomato EST unigene dataset and 57,222
full-length cDNA sequences that were available in MiBASE (http://www.accelrys.com/products/gcg).
Most of these SSRs (around 80%) were novel SSRs, since they did not match any
of the the mapped markers, thus being candidates for novel microsatellite markers
[10]. In addition, more than 250,000 ESTs derived from cDNA libraries are
currently catalogued on the SGN website. All these sequences are potentially
source of new markers, such as SSRs and SNPs, useful for tomato genome
analysis. In fact, besides SSRs, SNPs can also be mined from sequence data [11];
and an efficient in silico SNPs
discovery is feasible for tomato due to the availability of EST in public
databases [12]. Moreover, in the framework of the tomato sequencing project,
around 400,000 BAC ends are being sequenced that could also be mined to search
SNPs among Solanum genotypes (Ercolano
et al., unpublished results).  These will
allow useful PCR marker to be derived that also fall in intron regions, thus
complementing the detection of polymorphism in the coding regions represented
by the ESTs.Recently,
oligonucleotide-based arrays have been used to identify DNA sequence
polymorphisms in different species, since they allow high-throughput
development of markers. Total genomic DNA hybridization methods are also being
exploited in tomato with the aim of identifying markers such as single feature polymorphisms
(SFPs). For instance, a 15.27 K gene NimbleGen tomato array was used by Sim et
al. [13] for a study of polymorphism between S. lycopersicum and its closely related wild species.


### 2.2. Genetic and Physical Maps

Genetic mapping of morphological traits in tomato
started at the beginning of last century, and by 1973 a total of 257
morphological and disease resistance markers had been mapped [14]. By the
1990s, tomato had become one of the first plants for which RFLPs were used to
generate a high-density linkage map [15]. Later several genetic maps using
PCR-based markers were developed and integrated with the RFLP maps, as reviewed
by Labate et al. [16]. The first PCR-based reference genetic map covering the
entire tomato genome was reported by Frary et al. [5] for a population derived
from the cross S. lycopersicum×S. pennellii.The Solanaceae is the first family of flowering plants for which comparative mapping was conducted [17, 18]. As a
result, several genetic maps not only for tomato genome, but also for the
genomes of other Solanaceous crops are now available at the SGN site [4].
Comparative genome analysis showed that tomato and potato genomes differ in
only five paracentric inversions [15], whereas the tomato and
pepper genomes differ in numerous rearrangements including several
translocations as well as both pericentric and paracentric inversions [19, 20].
More recently, Doganlar et al. [21] have shown that eggplant and tomato genomes
are differentiated by 28 rearrangements, which could be explained by 23
paracentric inversions and five translocations. These data suggest that paracentric
inversions have been the primary mechanism for chromosome evolution in the
Solanaceae.Comparative genomics research is
presently gaining momentum in Solanaceae due to availability of sequencing data
for several species. This will greatly enhance the resolution of comparative
mapping in this family. This research activity received further support due to the
availability of whole genome sequence ofA.
thaliana, which facilitated the development of PCR-based COS markers using
genes shared between distantly related plant taxa [7, 8]. For instance,  in an
effort to determine the level of synteny between Arabidopsis genome and the genomes of tomato and other Solanceous
species, COSII markers are being mapped not only on tomato genome, but also on
the genomes of other major Solanaceous species including eggplant, pepper, and Nicotiana (http://www.sgn.cornell.edu/markers/cosii_markers.pl). Also, in order to test
the efficacy of COSII markers for comparative mapping across large phylogenetic
distances, a subset of COSII markers is being mapped on the genomes of both
tomato and diploid coffee (Coffea
canephora) [8].Besides genetic linkage maps,
cytological and cytogenetic maps are also available for tomato. For example,
Sherman and Stack [22] developed a physical map that was used to quantify the
distribution of crossovers along each chromosome. Physical maps were also developed
by in situ hybridisation
techniques and allowed a comparison of linear order and distances between markers
on genetic linkage maps and physical maps [23–25].  The results obtained by Peterson et al. [23]
have shown that the linear order of markers is not always conserved between
genetic and cytological positions.The availability of
mapped markers and of FISHed BAC allowed the construction of a high-density
integrated genetic and physical map, whose definition is still in progress, and
which is the foundation for the tomato genome sequencing project. Overgo
analysis has been used to match BAC to probes based on markers from theS. lycopersicon×S. pennellii map. This analysis found
600 markers that unambiguously anchor over 5000 BACs to the genetic map [26].
Actually, at SGN site there are more than 10 000 BACs, which are anchored to
the genetic maps.


### 2.3. QTL Mapping and Exploitation of Natural Biodiversity

The high-density RFLP linkage map
developed for tomato facilitated extensive mapping of qualitative traits such
as various disease resistance genes, for example, [27, 28]. This allowed tomato
breeders to use marker-assisted selection (MAS) for variety improvement.
Furthermore, tomato was the first species for which a whole genome molecular
linkage map was used to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) [29], leading to
an understanding of the genetic basis of numerous quantitative traits including
morphology, yield, fruit quality, fruit primary and secondary metabolites, as
well as resistance to a variety of abiotic and biotic stresses  [26]. The QTL mapping studies conducted by de Vicente and
Tanksley [30] and by Eshed and Zamir [31] using mapping populations derived
from interspecific tomato crosses provided stronger evidence that despite the
inferior phenotype, unadapted germplasm could also be used as a source of
complementary positive alleles that can result in favorable transgressive
phenotypes once incorporated in the cultivated background.The above results
indicated that new molecular breeding strategies need to be devised in order to
allow more efficient use of the genetic potential stored in seed banks and
exotic germplasm. One such approach, the “advanced backcross QTL mapping
method” was proposed by Tanksley and Nelson [32] with the purpose of combining
the process of QTL analysis with variety development, by simultaneously
identifying and transferring favorable QTL alleles from unadapted to
cultivated germplasm. The AB-QTL strategy was initially developed and tested in
tomato [33], and since then, it has been adapted for use in other crops
including rice, maize, wheat, pepper, barley, and bean [34]. So far five AB-QTL
studies have been conducted in tomato involving crosses with five wild Solanum species and in all cases
favorable wild QTL alleles have been detected for more than 45% of the
evaluated traits [34]. These data suggest that continued sampling of exotic
germplasm should guarantee the discovery of new and useful QTL alleles. Another
advantage of the AB-QTL method is that once favorable QTL alleles are detected
in segregating populations (i.e., BC2 or BC3), few additional
marker-assisted generations are required to develop near isogenic lines (NILs)
or introgression lines (ILs) that can be phenotyped in replicated trials in
order to confirm the QTL effect and subsequently be used for variety
development. Numerous QTL-NILs or ILs have been developed starting from the
tomato AB-QTL mapping populations, and several of them have been characterised
for numerous quantitative traits, for example, [35, 36].Since exotic germplasm is an important source of
favorable alleles for the improvement of quantitative traits, introgression
lines (ILs) developed in tomato have a special significance. This also supports
the proposal by Zamir [37] for investment in the development of “exotic
libraries.” Each such library consists of a set of ILs, each IL carrying a
single marker-defined chromosome segment derived from a donor exotic parent in
an otherwise homogeneous elite genetic background. The alien segment in each IL
generally also carries a specific gene, preferably in homozygous condition. A set
of overlapping ILs would together represent the entire genome of the donor
parent and several such sets of ILs constitute a permanent genetic resource,
since they can be maintained by self-pollination.In tomato, the first exotic library
ensuring whole genome coverage was developed by Eshed and Zamir [31] from the
cross between the wild green-fruited species S. pennellii (acc. LA716) and the cultivated tomato S. lycopersicum (cv. M82). Presently,
this library consists of 76 RFLP-defined ILs which partition the entire genetic
map into 107 bins defined by single or overlapping segments [38]. Over the past
15 years, the S. pennellii ILs and
their hybrids have been phenotyped for more than one hundred traits. For 20
different characters, such as  yield,
fruit morphology, and biochemical traits, repeated measurements are
available, and the resulting data are presented, in silico, in a search engine
called “Real Time QTL” [39] (http://zamir.sgn.cornell.edu/Qtl/Html/home.htm).The studies conducted on
theS. pennellii IL library have
highlighted the higher QTL mapping power of “exotic libraries” compared with
conventional segregating populations. Moreover, ILs have shown to be a powerful
genetic tool to study the epistatic interactions among QTLs [40], to obtain
more precise estimates of the magnitude of QTL x genetic background interaction
[31, 36, 41], and of QTL x environment
interaction [34, 36, 38, 41]. The high-resolution
mapping approach applied to S. pennellii ILs has led to the map-based cloning of the first two QTLs ever cloned: the
fruit weight QTL, fw2.2 [42], and the
sugar yield QTL, Brix9-2-5 [43].More recently, theS. pennellii “exotic library” is now
being used to identify the genes that influence heterosis [44, 45]. Furthermore,
MAS pyramiding of valuable wild QTLs in the genetic background of cultivated
tomato has demonstrated to be a successful approach for developing breeding
lines that can significantly outperform leading commercial hybrids under both
wet and dry field conditions [41]. The outcome of the application of the IL
breeding concept has been the development of a new processing tomato hybrid that
is currently the leading variety in California (http://www.ptab.org/ranking9.htm)
(D. Zamir, personal communication).The advantages of the IL
approach have motivated the public and private sectors to invest in the
development of new library resources starting from interspecific crosses with
different wild species of tomato includingS.
habrochaites, S. pimpinellifolium, S. lycopersicoides,  and S. chmielewskii [35, 46–49].To enhance the rate of
progress of introgression breeding in tomato, within the framework of a
currently running EU project (EU-SOL) (http://www.eu-sol.net), a genetic
infrastructure of “exotic libraries” is being further refined from a diverse
selection of accessions. Moreover, the IL populations are being anchored to a
common PCR marker-based framework, mostly consisting of COSII markers, which
will facilitate QTL identification, mapping, cloning of the underlying genes,
and the use of the novel variation in marker-assisted breeding.


## 2.1. Molecular Markers

Beginning in the 1980s, different types of
molecular markers have been developed in tomato. Among crop species, tomato is
one of the richest in the number and type of these genetic markers, including restriction
fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs), simple sequence repeats (SSRs), cleaved amplified
polymorphic sequence (CAPS), amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs),
and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). Chronologically, RFLPs were the
first markers developed. Currently, more than 1000 RFLPs have been mapped on
the 12 tomato chromosomes. A subset of RFLP markers has been converted into
PCR-based markers through sequencing of their ends. These sequences are
available from the SGN Database, thus allowing specific primers for PCR
reaction to be designed. Other PCR-based markers were developed both as random
markers, such as random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), AFLPs, and
locus-specific markers, such as SSRs, CAPS, and conserved ortholog sets (COSs);
and many of them have been mapped onto the high-density tomato genetic map [5].Given the huge number of markers that have been
set up for tomato using different methods, a database collecting the different
datasets is available at the SGN website. Indeed, all information for more than
15,000 markers is collected in the SGN [6], where a specific tool for “marker
search” allows markers to be located on the map. Markers can be searched by name,
chromosome position, mapping population, and BAC associations (if they have
been associated with BAC from the tomato sequencing project by hybridization
with overgo probes or computationally by BLAST comparisons). Some of them have
also been grouped into collections for organizational purposes or because they
are part of a particular project. So, it is possible to select either COS
(markers that have been mapped in both tomato and Arabidopsis) or COSII markers
(markers that have been mapped in several Asterid species, including several
Solanaceous species) [7, 8]. Other groups comprise known function genes
(KFG), or EST-derived (TM) markers.Recently, large-scale sequencing
work in tomato has been generating sequences of whole BAC and cloned genes,
ESTs collected from different cDNA libraries, and the sequences of full-length
cDNAs. The cataloguing of these sequences in public databases is providing
useful information to develop markers with high resolving power, such as SNPs
and InDels, thus initiating an era of in
silico tomato marker discovery. The tomato SSRs are an example of
genetic markers that can be mined from existing sequence data. Smulders et al.
[9], by screening the EMBL and GenBank Databases, identified 36 primer pairs,
which detected polymorphisms at or close to coding regions. In recent studies,
as many as 2627 SSRs were mined from an EST dataset by screening the 26,363 tomato EST unigene dataset and 57,222
full-length cDNA sequences that were available in MiBASE (http://www.accelrys.com/products/gcg).
Most of these SSRs (around 80%) were novel SSRs, since they did not match any
of the the mapped markers, thus being candidates for novel microsatellite markers
[10]. In addition, more than 250,000 ESTs derived from cDNA libraries are
currently catalogued on the SGN website. All these sequences are potentially
source of new markers, such as SSRs and SNPs, useful for tomato genome
analysis. In fact, besides SSRs, SNPs can also be mined from sequence data [11];
and an efficient in silico SNPs
discovery is feasible for tomato due to the availability of EST in public
databases [12]. Moreover, in the framework of the tomato sequencing project,
around 400,000 BAC ends are being sequenced that could also be mined to search
SNPs among Solanum genotypes (Ercolano
et al., unpublished results).  These will
allow useful PCR marker to be derived that also fall in intron regions, thus
complementing the detection of polymorphism in the coding regions represented
by the ESTs.Recently,
oligonucleotide-based arrays have been used to identify DNA sequence
polymorphisms in different species, since they allow high-throughput
development of markers. Total genomic DNA hybridization methods are also being
exploited in tomato with the aim of identifying markers such as single feature polymorphisms
(SFPs). For instance, a 15.27 K gene NimbleGen tomato array was used by Sim et
al. [13] for a study of polymorphism between S. lycopersicum and its closely related wild species.


## 2.2. Genetic and Physical Maps

Genetic mapping of morphological traits in tomato
started at the beginning of last century, and by 1973 a total of 257
morphological and disease resistance markers had been mapped [14]. By the
1990s, tomato had become one of the first plants for which RFLPs were used to
generate a high-density linkage map [15]. Later several genetic maps using
PCR-based markers were developed and integrated with the RFLP maps, as reviewed
by Labate et al. [16]. The first PCR-based reference genetic map covering the
entire tomato genome was reported by Frary et al. [5] for a population derived
from the cross S. lycopersicum×S. pennellii.The Solanaceae is the first family of flowering plants for which comparative mapping was conducted [17, 18]. As a
result, several genetic maps not only for tomato genome, but also for the
genomes of other Solanaceous crops are now available at the SGN site [4].
Comparative genome analysis showed that tomato and potato genomes differ in
only five paracentric inversions [15], whereas the tomato and
pepper genomes differ in numerous rearrangements including several
translocations as well as both pericentric and paracentric inversions [19, 20].
More recently, Doganlar et al. [21] have shown that eggplant and tomato genomes
are differentiated by 28 rearrangements, which could be explained by 23
paracentric inversions and five translocations. These data suggest that paracentric
inversions have been the primary mechanism for chromosome evolution in the
Solanaceae.Comparative genomics research is
presently gaining momentum in Solanaceae due to availability of sequencing data
for several species. This will greatly enhance the resolution of comparative
mapping in this family. This research activity received further support due to the
availability of whole genome sequence ofA.
thaliana, which facilitated the development of PCR-based COS markers using
genes shared between distantly related plant taxa [7, 8]. For instance,  in an
effort to determine the level of synteny between Arabidopsis genome and the genomes of tomato and other Solanceous
species, COSII markers are being mapped not only on tomato genome, but also on
the genomes of other major Solanaceous species including eggplant, pepper, and Nicotiana (http://www.sgn.cornell.edu/markers/cosii_markers.pl). Also, in order to test
the efficacy of COSII markers for comparative mapping across large phylogenetic
distances, a subset of COSII markers is being mapped on the genomes of both
tomato and diploid coffee (Coffea
canephora) [8].Besides genetic linkage maps,
cytological and cytogenetic maps are also available for tomato. For example,
Sherman and Stack [22] developed a physical map that was used to quantify the
distribution of crossovers along each chromosome. Physical maps were also developed
by in situ hybridisation
techniques and allowed a comparison of linear order and distances between markers
on genetic linkage maps and physical maps [23–25].  The results obtained by Peterson et al. [23]
have shown that the linear order of markers is not always conserved between
genetic and cytological positions.The availability of
mapped markers and of FISHed BAC allowed the construction of a high-density
integrated genetic and physical map, whose definition is still in progress, and
which is the foundation for the tomato genome sequencing project. Overgo
analysis has been used to match BAC to probes based on markers from theS. lycopersicon×S. pennellii map. This analysis found
600 markers that unambiguously anchor over 5000 BACs to the genetic map [26].
Actually, at SGN site there are more than 10 000 BACs, which are anchored to
the genetic maps.


## 2.3. QTL Mapping and Exploitation of Natural Biodiversity

The high-density RFLP linkage map
developed for tomato facilitated extensive mapping of qualitative traits such
as various disease resistance genes, for example, [27, 28]. This allowed tomato
breeders to use marker-assisted selection (MAS) for variety improvement.
Furthermore, tomato was the first species for which a whole genome molecular
linkage map was used to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) [29], leading to
an understanding of the genetic basis of numerous quantitative traits including
morphology, yield, fruit quality, fruit primary and secondary metabolites, as
well as resistance to a variety of abiotic and biotic stresses  [26]. The QTL mapping studies conducted by de Vicente and
Tanksley [30] and by Eshed and Zamir [31] using mapping populations derived
from interspecific tomato crosses provided stronger evidence that despite the
inferior phenotype, unadapted germplasm could also be used as a source of
complementary positive alleles that can result in favorable transgressive
phenotypes once incorporated in the cultivated background.The above results
indicated that new molecular breeding strategies need to be devised in order to
allow more efficient use of the genetic potential stored in seed banks and
exotic germplasm. One such approach, the “advanced backcross QTL mapping
method” was proposed by Tanksley and Nelson [32] with the purpose of combining
the process of QTL analysis with variety development, by simultaneously
identifying and transferring favorable QTL alleles from unadapted to
cultivated germplasm. The AB-QTL strategy was initially developed and tested in
tomato [33], and since then, it has been adapted for use in other crops
including rice, maize, wheat, pepper, barley, and bean [34]. So far five AB-QTL
studies have been conducted in tomato involving crosses with five wild Solanum species and in all cases
favorable wild QTL alleles have been detected for more than 45% of the
evaluated traits [34]. These data suggest that continued sampling of exotic
germplasm should guarantee the discovery of new and useful QTL alleles. Another
advantage of the AB-QTL method is that once favorable QTL alleles are detected
in segregating populations (i.e., BC2 or BC3), few additional
marker-assisted generations are required to develop near isogenic lines (NILs)
or introgression lines (ILs) that can be phenotyped in replicated trials in
order to confirm the QTL effect and subsequently be used for variety
development. Numerous QTL-NILs or ILs have been developed starting from the
tomato AB-QTL mapping populations, and several of them have been characterised
for numerous quantitative traits, for example, [35, 36].Since exotic germplasm is an important source of
favorable alleles for the improvement of quantitative traits, introgression
lines (ILs) developed in tomato have a special significance. This also supports
the proposal by Zamir [37] for investment in the development of “exotic
libraries.” Each such library consists of a set of ILs, each IL carrying a
single marker-defined chromosome segment derived from a donor exotic parent in
an otherwise homogeneous elite genetic background. The alien segment in each IL
generally also carries a specific gene, preferably in homozygous condition. A set
of overlapping ILs would together represent the entire genome of the donor
parent and several such sets of ILs constitute a permanent genetic resource,
since they can be maintained by self-pollination.In tomato, the first exotic library
ensuring whole genome coverage was developed by Eshed and Zamir [31] from the
cross between the wild green-fruited species S. pennellii (acc. LA716) and the cultivated tomato S. lycopersicum (cv. M82). Presently,
this library consists of 76 RFLP-defined ILs which partition the entire genetic
map into 107 bins defined by single or overlapping segments [38]. Over the past
15 years, the S. pennellii ILs and
their hybrids have been phenotyped for more than one hundred traits. For 20
different characters, such as  yield,
fruit morphology, and biochemical traits, repeated measurements are
available, and the resulting data are presented, in silico, in a search engine
called “Real Time QTL” [39] (http://zamir.sgn.cornell.edu/Qtl/Html/home.htm).The studies conducted on
theS. pennellii IL library have
highlighted the higher QTL mapping power of “exotic libraries” compared with
conventional segregating populations. Moreover, ILs have shown to be a powerful
genetic tool to study the epistatic interactions among QTLs [40], to obtain
more precise estimates of the magnitude of QTL x genetic background interaction
[31, 36, 41], and of QTL x environment
interaction [34, 36, 38, 41]. The high-resolution
mapping approach applied to S. pennellii ILs has led to the map-based cloning of the first two QTLs ever cloned: the
fruit weight QTL, fw2.2 [42], and the
sugar yield QTL, Brix9-2-5 [43].More recently, theS. pennellii “exotic library” is now
being used to identify the genes that influence heterosis [44, 45]. Furthermore,
MAS pyramiding of valuable wild QTLs in the genetic background of cultivated
tomato has demonstrated to be a successful approach for developing breeding
lines that can significantly outperform leading commercial hybrids under both
wet and dry field conditions [41]. The outcome of the application of the IL
breeding concept has been the development of a new processing tomato hybrid that
is currently the leading variety in California (http://www.ptab.org/ranking9.htm)
(D. Zamir, personal communication).The advantages of the IL
approach have motivated the public and private sectors to invest in the
development of new library resources starting from interspecific crosses with
different wild species of tomato includingS.
habrochaites, S. pimpinellifolium, S. lycopersicoides,  and S. chmielewskii [35, 46–49].To enhance the rate of
progress of introgression breeding in tomato, within the framework of a
currently running EU project (EU-SOL) (http://www.eu-sol.net), a genetic
infrastructure of “exotic libraries” is being further refined from a diverse
selection of accessions. Moreover, the IL populations are being anchored to a
common PCR marker-based framework, mostly consisting of COSII markers, which
will facilitate QTL identification, mapping, cloning of the underlying genes,
and the use of the novel variation in marker-assisted breeding.


## 3. Strategies for Tomato Genome Sequencing

The
tomato genome is being sequenced as the cornerstone of an International
Solanaceae Genome Initiative, a project that aims at developing the family
Solanaceae as a model for systems biology for understanding plant adaptation
and diversification (see International Solanaceae Genome Initiative white paper
(http://sgn.cornell.edu/solanaceae-project)).
A sequencing strategy on a BAC by BAC basis of approximately 220 Mb euchromatin
was proposed. The tomato genome comprises approximately 950 Mb of DNA—more than 75% of which is heterochromatin and
largely devoid of genes [2]. Most genes are found in long contiguous stretches
of gene dense euchromatin located on the distal portions of each chromosome
arm. The starting points for sequencing the genome are approximately 1500
“seed” BAC clones individually anchored to the tomato map by means of overgo
markers. Since most of the genetic markers anchoring the BAC correspond to
genes (or ESTs), the BAC are likely to be biased towards the euchromatic
portion of the genome.The division of sequencing activities between
countries was effected on a chromosome basis (see Figure1). Funding agencies
of each country supported the sequencing of corresponding chromosomes.
Additional funds to complete this task were provided for European countries by
the EU-SOL project.Figure 1
Countries partecipating to the genome sequencing project. For each chromosome the
distribution of euchromatic portions is also indicated (modified from the International Solanaceae
Genome Initiative white paperhttp://sgn.cornell.edu/solanaceae-project).In order to facilitate the sequencing task,
marker analysis strategies, cytogenetic protocols, and a number of
bionformatics and molecular tools have been developed in recent years. Most of
the genome sequencing resources, such as BAC libraries (LE_HBaHindIII library, SL_MboI, and SL_EcoRI, based on the Heinz 1706 genotype)
and web repositories, were provided by different partners. Seed BAC and contigs
were mapped to each chromosome at Cornell University by means of overgo probes.
A fingerprint map of approximately 10X genome equivalents from the LE_HBa
library has been constructed at the University of Arizona through funding from
the National Science Foundation (http://www.genome.arizona.edu/fpc/tomato).
Recently, a Sanger Initiative was focussed on the generation of additional
fingerprint data from the MboI
library in order to allow comparison and integration of the two datasets.
Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) was provided to help guide the
extension of the tiling path through the euchromatic arms of each chromosome
and to determine the location of heterochromatin regions [22, 50]. Validation
of single BAC assigned to each individual chromosome arm was also performed in
different participant countries. Moreover, a 3D pooling library to perform new
BAC screening was developed in Japan [10].Starting in 2005, during
the last two years of tomato sequencing activity, the participant countries set
up their own sequencing pipelines and started to construct the sequence
scaffold of assigned chromosomes.  Before
starting the sequencing work according to mapping information available at SGN,
seed BAC were selected using different strategies (IL mapping, internal
sequencing strategy, FISH localization).
After a low-coverage sequencing of each seed BAC, the construction of a
minimal tiling path of BAC clones was performed by BLASTing the sequence of
each “seed” BAC against the BAC-end STC Database to identify BAC with minimal
overlap in either directions. The BAC-end Database consisting of 200,000 clones
(fromEcoRI, HindIII, and MboI
libraries) was used both to confirm and extend the euchromatin minimal tiling
path (e-MTP).  Each BAC-end sequence was
subjected to automated annotation to determine the proportion of ends that are
likely to correspond to genic regions. To improve this process, different
strategies have been developed. In the Netherlands, BAC walking was supported
using a sequence-tagged connector approach based on AFLP fingerprinting as
outlined in Peters et al. [51]. In Japan, selected BAC Mixture (SBM) shotgun
sequencing has been set up. In this method, BAC clones whose end sequences do
not contain repeat sequences are selected: then the selected BACs are mixed and
shotgun sequencing is performed [10]. In our own laboratory, the use of
combined bioinformatics tools and molecular data to select a minimum tiling
path has been proven to reduce the overlap between adjacent clones. Good
extension candidate BAC have been selected using the software “BacEnds
Extension v 0.1” [52], which is complementary to the SGN Online
BLAST Interface. Following selection based on bioinformatics
analysis, and using the IL mapping strategy, chromosome location of the
selected extending BAC was experimentally confirmed. Also, the detection of
SNPs between S. lycopersicon and S. pennellii in both the resequenced
anchor marker region and the BAC-ends allowed positioning of each extending BAC
on chromosome 12 (see Figure 2). Despite a nonuniform distribution of seed BAC
on chromosome 12, small contigs consisting of overlapping BAC started to
emerge. Currently, sixty-five BACs are in different sequencing phases, and 20
of them will be available on public databases by the end of 2007. For 15 seed BAC,
at least one round of extension was performed; in some cases, where two or three
rounds of extension were performed, overlapping BACs were merged in sequence islands
of >300 kb. The contig of approximately 500 kb between markers T1045 and
T1211 was also filled up. Interestingly, the ratio of physical and genetic
distance in this region is 250 kb/cM.Figure 2
Strategy for selection of candidate extending BACs based on combined use of
bioinformatics analysis and experimental molecular data. Specific primer pairs were designed on
sequenced seed BAC-end (P1 pair), on “bridge” seed BAC (P2 pair), and on potential extending BACs
(P3, P4, P5 pairs), selected from the BAC-end database. All primer pairs were tested to amplify
fragments from candidate extending BACs. Sequences of P1 and P2 fragments were aligned to the
sequenced seed BAC and to the “bridge” seed BAC, respectively, to confirm both overlapping and
direction of candidate extending BACs. Amplification of P3, P4 and P5 fragments allowed the
selection of the longest extending BAC. IL mapping through specific IL-12 lines confirmed the
position of the selected extending BAC on chromosome 12.In all, a draft sequence has been constructed
for approximately 24% of the tomato euchromatic genome space, including all the
twelve chromosomes. Sequence islands spanning the genome are being joined and
edited in large regions. Progress can be viewed through the development of the
TPF and AGP files, available from the SGN repository. The TPF indicates the
expected relative positions of the BAC and the AGP provides assembly
information. The best coverage is on chromosome 2, where the sequencing of 141 BAC
is finished. Large portions of chromosomes 4 (with 77 BAC already sequenced) and
chromosome 8 (with 91 BAC already sequenced) have also been sequenced. In all,
more than 800 BAC are in different phases of sequencing, and sequences
belonging to more than 500 BAC accounting for approximately 21% of total BAC have
already been submitted to the SGN website.Assuming that work on the tomato genome project
will continue at the current pace, high-quality sequencing of the euchromatic
space should be completed within the next one or two years (by 2008 or 2009).
Since the euchromatic portion of the genome is estimated to be approximately
220 Mb, the average physical distance between two adjacent seed BAC should be
as little as 200 kb. However, the available map has insufficient density and resolution
to provide a template for complete sequencing, since there are large chromosome
regions, which are not yet targeted with markers. Therefore, in order to
complement the ongoing sequencing project, several new strategies have been undertaken. For
instance, selection of additional seed BAC with different verification methods
(e.g., IL mapping, FISH, etc.) has been proposed. The recent release of markers
from Syngenta to the SGN repository also allowed the identification of new
candidate seed BAC, which are distributed throughout the full genome. This may prove
useful for filling in gene spaces at a later stage of the project. Whole genome
shotgun sequencing and the availability of new generation sequencing
technologies, including 454/Roche’s sequencer FLX, Solexa’s sequencing system,
and ABI’s SOLiD, may also prove useful in completing the whole genome
sequencing of the tomato genome.


## 4. Functional Genomics

In order to understand
the function of specific genes and their role in metabolic pathways, as also to
identify the key steps in their coregulation mechanisms, several approaches
have been exploited, including mutagenesis, genetic transformation, and
transcriptome analysis.


### 4.1. Insertional Mutagenesis

Both classical and
insertional mutageneses have been used in tomato. Indeed, together with barley,Arabidopsis, and maize, tomato was the focus of early, extensive
mutagenesis programs. In a paper published in 1964, Hans Stubbe reviewed over
250 tomato mutants  arising from the seminal work of the Gatersleben group [53].
To date, over 600 characterized monogenic mutations are available in a variety
of genetic backgrounds at the Tomato Genetics Resource Center (http://tgrc.ucdavis.edu). More recently,
an extensive mutant population consisting of 6000 EMS-induced and 7000 fast neutron-induced
mutant lines has been obtained (54). This population is probably saturating.
For instance, extensive allelic tests confirmed that all the wiry mutants with 3 to 7 alleles present
in TGRC are represented in the population. Two new wiry loci have also been described in the collection, each with 10
alleles. A detailed phenotypic description of the mutants is available online (http://zamir.sgn.cornell.edu/mutants).Insertional mutagenesis systems
exploiting exogenous transposon systems have also been described in tomato [55–57]. Nevertheless, these systems, some of which utilize the Micro-Tom
cultivar, have not yielded saturating mutant collections and have thus not been
utilized extensively. Highly efficient protocols for transformation of
Micro-Tom have been described [58], which may serve as a tool for extensive
T-DNA mutagenesis programs also.


#### 4.1.1. Targeting Induced Local Lesions in Genomes

In addition to the above,
a more recent strategy called targeting induced local lesions IN genomes (TILLING) was described by
McCallum et al. [59] for targeting local mutations in the genome. This is, a
PCR-based strategy that provides an allelic series of induced point mutations
in genes of interest. As such, it can be applied to most organisms, even to
those for which an efficient transformation system is not available. TILLING
has been used for high-throughput isolation of mutants in Arabidopsis [60] as
well as in several crop plants [61]. TILLING platforms for tomato are under
development in several countries, including the US, France, Italy, and India.
The Franco-Italian effort is coordinated by the EU-SOL project (http://www.eu-sol.net).


### 4.2. Gene Silencing (RNAi and VIGS)

Strategies for gene
silencing have also been widely used as a tool for functional genomics research
in tomato. Indeed, tomato fruit ripening was one of the early systems in which
both sense and antisense silencing were found to be effective [62, 63]. More
recently, RNA interference (RNAi) and virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) have also
been successfully used as functional genomics tools in tomato. Interestingly, the use of RNAi remains
confined in the fruit, thus making
the fruit-specific silencing of genes possible [64]. Similarly, VIGS has been
described in tomato roots [65] and fruits [66] although the extent to which
silencing remains confined to these organs has not been extensively investigated. Several
viral vectors have been used, including Tobacco rattle virus (TRV) [67], Tomato
yellow leaf curl China virus isolate [68], and potato virus X [69]. Of these,
TRV displays the widest host range, allowing silencing in several Solanum species [70], as well as in
non-Solanaceous species like opium poppy [71] and Arabidopsis [72].


### 4.3. Transient Expression of Exogenous Genes

Transient expression of
exogenous genes has also been achieved through several transient transformation
techniques, such as particle bombardment or agroinfiltration. Recently, an
agroinjection technique was developed for tomato fruits [73], which allow the
functional analysis of several genes in fruits in a short time. This technique
has been used both for expression of exogenous genes and for TRV-induced gene
silencing.


### 4.4. Transcriptional Profiling

Finally, transcriptional profiling is being widely explored since the extensive EST collection available
in tomato [4] has allowed designing of several microarray platforms: the most
widely used to date has been Tom1, a cDNA-based microarray containing probes
for approximately 8000 independent genes; and Tom2, a long oligonucleotide-based microarray
containing probes for approximately 11000 independent genes. Both these microarrays
are already available from BTI (http://bti.cornell.edu/CGEP/CGEP.html)
and soon Tom2 will also be available from the EU-SOL project (http://www.eu-sol.net). The third array
is an Affymetrix Genechip, which contains
probe sets for approximately 9000 independent genes (http://www.affymetrix.com/products/arrays/specific/tomato.affx).
As the tomato genome project progresses, a comprehensive, public tomato microarray
platform will become indispensable.


## 4.1. Insertional Mutagenesis

Both classical and
insertional mutageneses have been used in tomato. Indeed, together with barley,Arabidopsis, and maize, tomato was the focus of early, extensive
mutagenesis programs. In a paper published in 1964, Hans Stubbe reviewed over
250 tomato mutants  arising from the seminal work of the Gatersleben group [53].
To date, over 600 characterized monogenic mutations are available in a variety
of genetic backgrounds at the Tomato Genetics Resource Center (http://tgrc.ucdavis.edu). More recently,
an extensive mutant population consisting of 6000 EMS-induced and 7000 fast neutron-induced
mutant lines has been obtained (54). This population is probably saturating.
For instance, extensive allelic tests confirmed that all the wiry mutants with 3 to 7 alleles present
in TGRC are represented in the population. Two new wiry loci have also been described in the collection, each with 10
alleles. A detailed phenotypic description of the mutants is available online (http://zamir.sgn.cornell.edu/mutants).Insertional mutagenesis systems
exploiting exogenous transposon systems have also been described in tomato [55–57]. Nevertheless, these systems, some of which utilize the Micro-Tom
cultivar, have not yielded saturating mutant collections and have thus not been
utilized extensively. Highly efficient protocols for transformation of
Micro-Tom have been described [58], which may serve as a tool for extensive
T-DNA mutagenesis programs also.


### 4.1.1. Targeting Induced Local Lesions in Genomes

In addition to the above,
a more recent strategy called targeting induced local lesions IN genomes (TILLING) was described by
McCallum et al. [59] for targeting local mutations in the genome. This is, a
PCR-based strategy that provides an allelic series of induced point mutations
in genes of interest. As such, it can be applied to most organisms, even to
those for which an efficient transformation system is not available. TILLING
has been used for high-throughput isolation of mutants in Arabidopsis [60] as
well as in several crop plants [61]. TILLING platforms for tomato are under
development in several countries, including the US, France, Italy, and India.
The Franco-Italian effort is coordinated by the EU-SOL project (http://www.eu-sol.net).


## 4.1.1. Targeting Induced Local Lesions in Genomes

In addition to the above,
a more recent strategy called targeting induced local lesions IN genomes (TILLING) was described by
McCallum et al. [59] for targeting local mutations in the genome. This is, a
PCR-based strategy that provides an allelic series of induced point mutations
in genes of interest. As such, it can be applied to most organisms, even to
those for which an efficient transformation system is not available. TILLING
has been used for high-throughput isolation of mutants in Arabidopsis [60] as
well as in several crop plants [61]. TILLING platforms for tomato are under
development in several countries, including the US, France, Italy, and India.
The Franco-Italian effort is coordinated by the EU-SOL project (http://www.eu-sol.net).


## 4.2. Gene Silencing (RNAi and VIGS)

Strategies for gene
silencing have also been widely used as a tool for functional genomics research
in tomato. Indeed, tomato fruit ripening was one of the early systems in which
both sense and antisense silencing were found to be effective [62, 63]. More
recently, RNA interference (RNAi) and virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) have also
been successfully used as functional genomics tools in tomato. Interestingly, the use of RNAi remains
confined in the fruit, thus making
the fruit-specific silencing of genes possible [64]. Similarly, VIGS has been
described in tomato roots [65] and fruits [66] although the extent to which
silencing remains confined to these organs has not been extensively investigated. Several
viral vectors have been used, including Tobacco rattle virus (TRV) [67], Tomato
yellow leaf curl China virus isolate [68], and potato virus X [69]. Of these,
TRV displays the widest host range, allowing silencing in several Solanum species [70], as well as in
non-Solanaceous species like opium poppy [71] and Arabidopsis [72].


## 4.3. Transient Expression of Exogenous Genes

Transient expression of
exogenous genes has also been achieved through several transient transformation
techniques, such as particle bombardment or agroinfiltration. Recently, an
agroinjection technique was developed for tomato fruits [73], which allow the
functional analysis of several genes in fruits in a short time. This technique
has been used both for expression of exogenous genes and for TRV-induced gene
silencing.


## 4.4. Transcriptional Profiling

Finally, transcriptional profiling is being widely explored since the extensive EST collection available
in tomato [4] has allowed designing of several microarray platforms: the most
widely used to date has been Tom1, a cDNA-based microarray containing probes
for approximately 8000 independent genes; and Tom2, a long oligonucleotide-based microarray
containing probes for approximately 11000 independent genes. Both these microarrays
are already available from BTI (http://bti.cornell.edu/CGEP/CGEP.html)
and soon Tom2 will also be available from the EU-SOL project (http://www.eu-sol.net). The third array
is an Affymetrix Genechip, which contains
probe sets for approximately 9000 independent genes (http://www.affymetrix.com/products/arrays/specific/tomato.affx).
As the tomato genome project progresses, a comprehensive, public tomato microarray
platform will become indispensable.


## 5. Bioinformatics

In order to address key questions
arising from the SOL initiative, an overwhelming amount of data from
different “omics” approaches is being generated and can be utilized
for genomics research. Therefore, bioinformatics approaches assume major
importance in order to convert raw data into biologically meaningful
information. The SOL network is planning a bioinformatics infrastructure that
should support integration of information from Solanaceae research into a
“one-stop shop” on the web. This will ultimately allow Solanaceae biology to be
approached from a systems biology perspective. The bioinformatics centers in
the SOL network are all involved in building this infrastructure. It will rely
on web service approaches [74] to implement a virtual online center of
information dedicated to Solanaceae.The preliminary effort
of the bioinformatician in the SOL network is mainly focussed on setting up a
distributed annotation pipeline to provide a high-quality, information-enriched
tomato genome. For this purpose, the International Tomato Annotation Group (ITAG)
has been constituted, which is a collaborative effort in annotating the tomato
genome. It involves several groups from Europe, Asia, and the US. These groups
of scientists are organizing data and sharing methodologies to provide a
reliable tomato genome annotation. The ITAG annotation pipeline
(http://www.sgn.cornell.edu/sequencing/ITAG/status_html.pl) is currently being
developed through work on batches of sequences, which are generated at the SGN
by grouping BAC which are being submitted by each sequencing center. Analyses,
such as repeat masking, EST alignment and gene predictions, are performed on
the BAC. These data are fed into the EuGene combiner software [75] for homology
searches using protein or genomic sequences from other species. The resulting
predicted genes are then functionally annotated based on homology searches, protein
domain identifications, and Gene Ontology assignments. Each consortium member
takes on different tasks according to a predefined job distribution and in
accordance with its specific expertise.The preliminary effort
of a genome annotation exercise requires a definition of reliable gene models
from tomato to support the training of gene predictors. The definition of a
tomato-specific set of reference gene models is a necessary step towards
reliable predictions and a preliminary task of the ITAG. EST/cDNA sequences can
be fully exploited if they are first clustered and assembled into high-quality
consensus and are then properly aligned against genomic sequences. The
organization of tomato and other Solanaceae EST collections is a prerequisite
to provide a preliminary annotation of the tomato genome, which is supported by
experimental evidence.Several
specific EST repositories fromS.
lycopersicum are available worldwide (Table 1). The TIGR Tomato Gene Index (LeGI) is a collection of virtual
tentative consensus (TC) sequences constructed by clustering and assembling
213,974 ESTs and 2,043 ETs (release 11) generated in several
laboratories, including the TIGR Institute, Cornell University, and the Boyce
Thompson Institute.The SOL
Genomics Network (SGN) [4], a website dedicated to the biology of
the Solanaceae, organizes and distributes ESTs (~239,593), sequenced from 35
different cDNA libraries from S.
lycopersicum (32), S. pennellii (2), S. habrochaites (1), and the
corresponding “combined” consensus sequences. Other EST resources are as follows: (i) the Tomato Stress EST Database (TSED), which contains ESTs from more
than ten stress-treated substractive cDNA libraries from S. lycopersicum; (ii) the
Micro-Tom Database (MiBASE)
[76], which distributes unigenes obtained by assembling 35,824 Micro-Tom (a
miniature and dwarf tomato cultivar) ESTs from full-length cDNA libraries and
150,581 ESTs from other tomato lines; (iii) the PlantGDB [77], which collects
PlantGDB-assembled Unique Transcripts (PUT) from many different species
including those of S. lycopersicum generated
from EST sequences available at the NCBI dbEST Database [78].Table 1
Solanaceae EST resources in the world.
ResourceWeb addressSpecies includedSolanaceae Genomics Network (SGN)www.sgn.cornell.eduTomato, potato, pepper, eggplant, and petuniaTIGR Plant Gene Indicescompbio.dfci.harvard.edu/tgi/plant.htmlTomato,
potato, pepper, petunia, tobacco, and N. benthamianaPlantGDB—Plant Gene Indiceswww.plantgdb.org/prj/ESTCluster/index.phpTomato, potato,
petunia, and different species of
Nicotiana genusTomato Stress EST Database (TSED)ibs.sinica.edu.tw/ibsdb/app_all/index.phpTomato ESTs
from stress-treated substractive cDNA
librariesMIBASE—Micro-Tom Databasewww.kazusa.or.jp/jsol/nicrotom/indexj.htmlMicro-Tom
EST librariesItalian Solanaceae EST
Databasebiosrv.cab.unina.itTomato, potato, and
other Solanaceae species EST
collectionsCAB-developed TomatEST [79], a secondary database of EST/cDNA sequences,
today contains 112 libraries from all the tomato
species available at dbEST. TomatEST has been designed to provide a workbench for mining the
complexity of EST sequences information content from multiple tomato species.
This will then allow expression pattern analysis and gene discovery in the
framework of the S. lycopersicum genome project.The
CAB group within the EU-SOL project (http://www.eu-sol.net) is committed to
collect all EST data from Solanaceae species available in dbEST (Table 1) and
to provide EST alignments to the tomato genome draft sequences under
production. Also ESTs from two species of the Coffea genus (Rubiaceae) were considered in the CAB collection,
since coffee and tomato share common gene repertoires [80]. A specific tool has
been designed to remove the overrepresented EST sequences from each of the 16
species collections in order to clip the original datasets and produce nonredundant
sets of sequences. These EST collections are independently processed by the
ParPEST pipeline [81] to generate tentative consensus sequences (TCs).The definition of gene models based on EST/cDNA
data is a complex effort. D’Agostino et al. [82] proposed a methodology based on the
analysis of spliced alignments of EST and tentative consensus sequences to
automatically define a reliable dataset of gene models in tomato. Suitable
methodologies are used for EST clustering and assembling, and for EST/TC to
genome mapping; and resulting conflicts and ambiguities are independently
classified.In the current update of the tomato genome, 582
TCs ofS. lycopersicum have been
selected as they are consistently supported by EST evidence [81]. Among these
TCs, 70 cover at least 95% of the length of the most similar protein sequence;
168 cover at least 50%; 257 cover less than 50% of the matching protein, and
the remaining 87 show no significant similarity to known proteins. Considering TCs from other tomato
species among those mapping to the S. lycopersicum BAC, additional 21 loci
are located. The number accordingly increases to 251 loci if the potato TC
sequences are also considered. Only the TCs covering 95% of the length of the
matching protein are selected as complete reliable gene models for training gene predictors. To date they account for a
total of 108 gene models.In order to
contribute to the tomato genome annotation and to accomplish the requirements
of an efficient data integration, the CAB group developed ISOL@ (Chiusano et al., unpublished results), an Italian bioinformatics resource for
Solanaceae genomics. This effort is conceived to support the analysis of the
genome organization and its functionality in the light of evolutionary
approaches over the entire Solanaceae family.ISOL@ is currently
organized into two main levels: thegenome level and the expression level. The cornerstone of the genome level is represented by the tomato genome
draft sequences. The founding elements of the expression level are the
Solanaceae EST collections and the oligonucleotide probe sets, which have been
generated for the production of the tomato expression microarrays (http://www.affymetrix.com/products/arrays/specific/tomato.affx).
A nonstop crosstalk between the levels is based on data source sharing and on
integration of the information, which belongs to the respective under parts.
Each level can be independently accessed through specific web interfaces which
allow user-driven data investigation (http://biosrv.cab.unina.it/isola/isola.html).In order to provide a preliminary annotation of the
BAC sequences while waiting for the whole genome annotation that will be
provided by the ITAG, the CAB group has set up an automated annotation pipeline
in order to ensure daily retrieval of newS.
lycopersicum BAC sequences from GenBank, which are used to feed the genome
annotation process. The BAC annotation
process aims at identifying genes and other genetic elements on the draft
genome sequence. The protein coding “gene finding” process is
exclusively based on spliced-alignments of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) to
the S. lycopersicum genomic sequences that are also provided to the
distributed pipeline, which was set up within the ITAG effort. To accomplish
this task, ESTs from the different plant source collection at CAB (Solanaceae
and Rubiaceae species), and the corresponding TCs, created by assembling ESTs
in a cluster, are both used. Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) from the Rfam collection [83]
are also aligned to the genomic sequences. The TIGR Solanaceae Repeats Database
[84] is the resource selected for the identification of repetitive sequences in
the S. lycopersicum genome. The Italian platform also includes
alignments of all the RNA sequences from Arabidopsis to the tomato genomic
sequences in order to identify genes that are conserved between the two
species.The collection, as of July 2007, comprises 186 BAC
sequences which have been uploaded from all the sequencing centers to the
GenBank Database. The BAC sequences collected and annotated are released to the scientific
community through the Gbrowse [85] web application at CAB
(http://biosrv.cab.unina.it/GBrowse). Tracks showing annotations and other
features are displayed and cross-linked with other local or external databases
which can be explored through web interfaces.This above effort aims at
producing a computational workbench for the analysis of the organization, the
functionality, and the evolution of genomes in the Solanaceae family. In
addition, it provides experimental biologists with a preliminary annotation of
tomato genome data, and represents a reference point while sequencing the
tomato genome. Indeed, the
crosstalk between the sequencing data and the computationally defined TCs may
support BAC extension [86] and a
preliminary evaluation of the gene content of each BAC under sequencing.


## 6. Perspectives

In the “-omics” age, strategies for
integrated genomics that include DNA sequence mining, expression profiling
data, and functional and molecular diversity analyses of candidate genes,
combined with the use of introgression lines, can increase the efficiency in
discovery, candidate gene identification, and cloning of target QTLs [87].
Given the large amount of data that is being generated and will be generated in
future, a current bioinformatics challenge is to develop user-friendly
bioinformatics management systems that will allow description of the genetic
components of subtle QTLs and their integration with genome information including
gene content, expression, and function [41]. The development of tomato into a
model Solanaceous plant, with a large collection of genetic and genomic tools
and a high-quality reference genome sequence, and the high throughput
sequencing of 100 additional Solanaceae genomes (SOL-100 project) will
facilitate the understanding of the incredible ecological and morphological
adaptation exhibited by the Solanaceae family.



---

*Source: 820274-2008-01-31.xml*