# Valve Fault Diagnosis in Internal Combustion Engines Using Acoustic Emission and Artificial Neural Network

Authors: S. M. Jafari; H. Mehdigholi; M. Behzad
Journal: Shock and Vibration
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

This paper presents the potential of acoustic emission (AE) technique to detect valve damage in internal combustion engines. The cylinder head of a spark-ignited engine was used as the experimental setup. The effect of three types of valve damage (clearance, semicrack, and notch) on valve leakage was investigated. The experimental results showed that AE is an effective method to detect damage and the type of damage in valves in both of the time and frequency domains. An artificial neural network was trained based on time domain analysis using AE parametric features (AE
rms, count, absolute AE energy, maximum signal amplitude, and average signal level). The network consisted of five, six, and five nodes in the input, hidden, and output layers, respectively. The results of the trained system showed that the AE technique could be used to identify the type of damage and its location.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The valves in an internal combustion engine play a significant role in engine performance. Moreover they are the most important components in the valvetrain and face high temperatures and gas pressure impulses. In the failure analysis of a valvetrain, valve failures represent the most common problems. The major causes of valve failure are distortion of the valve seat, deposits on the valve, small tappet clearance, burnt valve, erosion of valves, heat fatigue, pitting, breaks, and wear [1, 2]. In recent years, implementing condition monitoring techniques for internal combustion (IC) engines has led to reliable nonintrusive methods for engine diagnosis [3].It is possible for turbulent flow, such as air flow through valves, to induce vibrations in their structures. The frequency of oscillation depends on the stiffness of the structure. The amplitude depends on mean flow velocity and on how close the forcing frequency is to the natural frequency of the structure. Lighthill’s formulation of the aeroacoustic problem showed that the mixing region of a jet could be equated to a volume of quadrupoles with strength proportional to the stress tensor in the moving fluid. Such a mathematical formulation allows radiated jet acoustic power levels to be estimated and proportional tov
8 [4]:
(1)
P
s
=
ρ
v
8
d
2
α
5
,
where P
s is the sound power (W), d is the diameter of the leakage hole, v is the average turbulence jet velocity (m/s), and α is the sound velocity in the fluid (m/s). Equation (1) clearly shows that flow velocity has the most effect on generating sound. The mass of air flow in/out to the cylinder is related to the air density, velocity, and area through which the gas flows:
(2)
m
˙
=
ρ
A
v
,
where m
˙ is the mass flow (kg/s), A represents the area through which the gas flows (m2), ρ relates the flow density (kg/m3), and v is the flow velocity (m/s). In this study, the valve diameters were d
ev
=
30.52
mm for the exhaust valve and d
iv
=
36.24
mm for the intake valve.Vibration analysis is a well-established technique for fault diagnosis in rotating machinery, particularly for IC engines. Application of this technique to an IC engine is strongly affected by engine faults, auxiliary devices, and mechanical events in the engine [5]. The high signal-to-noise ratio characteristic of the AE signal in comparison to vibration analysis has led to widespread interest in the last decade for AE application in the field of fault diagnosis of engines [6].Recent research has shown the success of AE applications for IC engines. Different engine faults and processes have been simulated, including cylinder misfire [7], exhaust manifold gasket leakage [8], piston ring/cylinder liner scuffing [9], fuel injection problems and processes [10–13], cylinder pressure [14], engine lubrication [15], and valve leakage (VL) [16–21].There are comprehensive investigation methods for fault diagnostic of VL using the AE method. All of them simulate the VL fault using valve clearance change [16–21]; however, significant causes exist besides clearance that eventuate in VL such as valve head crack and valve head notch. Using AE signals in VL to identify the type of fault is a new area of research that was addressed in this study. Three fault types (valve clearance, valve head crack, and valve head notch) were artificially simulated as follows.(i)
The valve clearance fault was simulated by a very small lift in valve.
(ii)
Valve head crack fault was simulated by a semicrack on the exhaust/intake valve head.
(iii)
The removal of a small amount of valve head material simulates valve head notch.The test rig was a cylinder head for a spark-ignited engine. The aim of this investigation at this stage was to use AE signals in VL to identify fault types in an engine that is not running.


## 2. Experimental Setup

### 2.1. Test Rig and Measurement System

The test setup consisted of the aluminium cylinder head of a small four-cylinder spark-ignited engine. Figure1(a) shows the position of four wideband AE sensors on the cylinder head and a schematic of the test rig. Pressurized air entered the combustion chamber through the spark plug hole. Air flow was measured using an air flow meter with an accuracy of 1 L/min.Test rig overview. (a) AE sensors positions and (b) schematic of measurement system.
(a)
(b)


### 2.2. AE Data Acquisition System

AE signals were acquired using four wideband sensors. The operating frequency was filtered from 100 kHz to 1 MHz. The AE sensors were coupled to the cylinder head using thin layers of vacuum grease. The signals were then amplified using PAC 2/4/6 preamplifiers before being recorded. Then the signals were digitized using a PAC PCI-2 (18 bit A/D, 40 MHz, 4 channels) AE data acquisition system. Raw data was acquired at a sampling rate of 2 MHz. AE sensors were mounted on the cylinder head near the spark plug hole on all four cylinders, as shown in Figure1.


### 2.3. Simulated Valve Fault Types

Three types of valve fault were artificially simulated. The test procedures were similar for all cases: inserting pressurized air through the spark plug hole and leakage measurement at the target valve port caused by its faulty valve. These faults are detailed below.(i)
Semicracked Valve. This fault was simulated by making a semicrack on the valve head using the wire cut method. The exhaust valve of cylinder number 1 and intake valve of cylinder number 2 were simulated using this method. The area of the removed surface of the valve head was 0.27
×
3.72
mm, as shown in Figure 2.
(ii)
Notched Valve. This fault was simulated by removing a slight amount of material from the seating face width of the exhaust valve, as shown in Figure 3.
(iii)
Valve Clearance. This fault was simulated by a 0.1 mm lift to the exhaust and intake valves of cylinder number 4. Figure 4 shows a healthy valve in cylinder 4 that has no leakage at zero lift. External lift simulated extra clearance.Semicracked valves. (a) Cylinder number 1 and (b) cylinder nymber 2.
(a)
(b)Figure 3
Notched exhaust valve of cylinder number 3.Figure 4
Healthy valves of cylinder number 4. Clearance fault was simulated by lift on valves.


### 2.4. Test Procedure

The valves of cylinder 4 were healthy and they had no leakage at zero lift; therefore the exhaust and intake valves were separately lifted 0.1 mm using a lifter bolt. Lift was measured by a dial gauge with an accuracy of 0.01 mm as shown in Figure1(b). At each step, one valve (exhaust or intake) was opened. Inlet pressurized air was controlled using a pressure regulator from 1 to 6 bar. At each pressure, all parameters were recorded (4 AE sensors, leakage rate, lift, and inlet air pressure). There was no lift for cylinders 1 to 3 because one valve of each cylinder was faulty and had leakage at zero lift.


## 2.1. Test Rig and Measurement System

The test setup consisted of the aluminium cylinder head of a small four-cylinder spark-ignited engine. Figure1(a) shows the position of four wideband AE sensors on the cylinder head and a schematic of the test rig. Pressurized air entered the combustion chamber through the spark plug hole. Air flow was measured using an air flow meter with an accuracy of 1 L/min.Test rig overview. (a) AE sensors positions and (b) schematic of measurement system.
(a)
(b)


## 2.2. AE Data Acquisition System

AE signals were acquired using four wideband sensors. The operating frequency was filtered from 100 kHz to 1 MHz. The AE sensors were coupled to the cylinder head using thin layers of vacuum grease. The signals were then amplified using PAC 2/4/6 preamplifiers before being recorded. Then the signals were digitized using a PAC PCI-2 (18 bit A/D, 40 MHz, 4 channels) AE data acquisition system. Raw data was acquired at a sampling rate of 2 MHz. AE sensors were mounted on the cylinder head near the spark plug hole on all four cylinders, as shown in Figure1.


## 2.3. Simulated Valve Fault Types

Three types of valve fault were artificially simulated. The test procedures were similar for all cases: inserting pressurized air through the spark plug hole and leakage measurement at the target valve port caused by its faulty valve. These faults are detailed below.(i)
Semicracked Valve. This fault was simulated by making a semicrack on the valve head using the wire cut method. The exhaust valve of cylinder number 1 and intake valve of cylinder number 2 were simulated using this method. The area of the removed surface of the valve head was 0.27
×
3.72
mm, as shown in Figure 2.
(ii)
Notched Valve. This fault was simulated by removing a slight amount of material from the seating face width of the exhaust valve, as shown in Figure 3.
(iii)
Valve Clearance. This fault was simulated by a 0.1 mm lift to the exhaust and intake valves of cylinder number 4. Figure 4 shows a healthy valve in cylinder 4 that has no leakage at zero lift. External lift simulated extra clearance.Semicracked valves. (a) Cylinder number 1 and (b) cylinder nymber 2.
(a)
(b)Figure 3
Notched exhaust valve of cylinder number 3.Figure 4
Healthy valves of cylinder number 4. Clearance fault was simulated by lift on valves.


## 2.4. Test Procedure

The valves of cylinder 4 were healthy and they had no leakage at zero lift; therefore the exhaust and intake valves were separately lifted 0.1 mm using a lifter bolt. Lift was measured by a dial gauge with an accuracy of 0.01 mm as shown in Figure1(b). At each step, one valve (exhaust or intake) was opened. Inlet pressurized air was controlled using a pressure regulator from 1 to 6 bar. At each pressure, all parameters were recorded (4 AE sensors, leakage rate, lift, and inlet air pressure). There was no lift for cylinders 1 to 3 because one valve of each cylinder was faulty and had leakage at zero lift.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Valve Leakage Results

Figure5 shows the VL rate for all four cylinders versus inlet pressurized air for the different fault types. As expected, leakage rate increased as pressure increased for all fault types.Figure 5
VL rate of all cylinders versus inlet pressurized air.


### 3.2. Time Domain Signal Analysis

Analysis in the time domain reveals the overall signal amplitude, periodic features, and AE signal type. Figures6, 7, 8, and 9 show the raw AE waveform caused by VL at each cylinder. The data in Figures 6–9 are for the AE sensor nearest to the studied cylinder (sensors 1–4 for cylinder 1–4, resp.). Figure 10 shows the AE signals recorded for healthy valves with no leakage at zero lift and healthy valves from the same cylinders with no leakage at zero lift. Figures 6–9 show the AE signal acquired for 0.02 sec.Figure 6
Raw AE signal due to VL through semicracked exhaust valve in cylinder 1.Figure 7
Raw AE signal due to VL through semicracked intake valve in cylinder 2.Figure 8
Raw AE signal due to VL through notched exhaust valve in cylinder 3.Raw AE signal due to leakage through lifted valve in cylinder 4. (a) 0.1 mm lifted exhaust valve and (b) 0.1 mm lifted intake valve.
(a)
(b)Figure 10
Raw AE signal relate to healthy valves with no leakage in cylinder 4.Equation (1) shows that the acoustic power level was proportional to v
8, which means that acoustic power level was strongly dependent on leakage velocity; therefore, an increase in the leakage rate caused a very clear change in AE signal amplitude.In all cases, it was observed that AE signals were typically continuous and the amplitude of the AE signal increased as the inlet pressure increased. Figures6–8 show the results for semicracked and notched valves in cylinders 1–3. It can be seen that the AE signals were very similar in wave form and amplitude; thus, it was not easy to distinguish between signals produced by different faults.Figure9 shows the results for the lifted valves in cylinder 4 and indicates that the signals have only a slightly different wave. It can be seen that the AE signals recorded from the exhaust and intake lifted valves are almost the same.The signals in Figure10 can be regarded as basic AE amplitudes for VL and are related to the existence of compressed air in the cylinder chamber, the test setup, environment, and background noise.


### 3.3. Frequency Domain Signal Analysis

Frequency analysis of the AE signal from the VL shows the energy distribution of the signal in the frequency domain. Figures11, 12, 13, and 14 show the power spectral density (PSD) of the signals shown in Figures 6–9. Frequency analysis of the AE signals demonstrates that gas leakage generates broadband AE signal. Moreover comparing Figure 15 for the spectrum of healthy valves with those in Figures 11–14 shows that there are some picks in the spectrum of faulty valves, while these do not exist in healthy ones.Figure 11
Power spectral density of raw AE signal due to VL through semicracked exhaust valve in cylinder 1 versus time at 1–6 bar by sensor number 1.Figure 12
Power spectral density of raw AE signal due to VL through semicracked intake valve in cylinder 2.Figure 13
Power spectral density of raw AE signal due to VL through notched exhaust valve in cylinder 3.Power spectral density of raw AE signal due to VL through 0.1 mm lifted valve in cylinder 4. (a) Exhaust valve and (b) intake valve.
(a)
(b)Figure 15
Power spectral density of raw AE signal for healthy valves with no leakage in cylinder 4.In Figures11–13, the frequency analysis of AE signals for semicracked and notched valves exhibited similar behavior, as would be expected from their waveforms in Figures 6–8. Figure 14 shows the results of frequency analysis of the AE signal from the exhaust and intake VL of cylinder 4. It can be seen that both exhaust and intake were very similar in their PSD analyses. Figure 15 presents the PSD analysis of the AE signal recorded for healthy valves with no leakage.Although the frequency analysis detected the healthy and simulated faulty valves in the frequency domain, this method faced difficulties in showing a clear difference between the types of defective valves. For example, it was difficult to distinguish between the semicracked and notched valves. Separating the different types of faults requires an expert and systematic method. An artificial neural network (ANN) based on AE parameters extracted from raw AE signals was utilized for this stage. The parameters were the AE basic parameters: AErms, count, absolute AE energy, maximum signal amplitude, and average signal level.


## 3.1. Valve Leakage Results

Figure5 shows the VL rate for all four cylinders versus inlet pressurized air for the different fault types. As expected, leakage rate increased as pressure increased for all fault types.Figure 5
VL rate of all cylinders versus inlet pressurized air.


## 3.2. Time Domain Signal Analysis

Analysis in the time domain reveals the overall signal amplitude, periodic features, and AE signal type. Figures6, 7, 8, and 9 show the raw AE waveform caused by VL at each cylinder. The data in Figures 6–9 are for the AE sensor nearest to the studied cylinder (sensors 1–4 for cylinder 1–4, resp.). Figure 10 shows the AE signals recorded for healthy valves with no leakage at zero lift and healthy valves from the same cylinders with no leakage at zero lift. Figures 6–9 show the AE signal acquired for 0.02 sec.Figure 6
Raw AE signal due to VL through semicracked exhaust valve in cylinder 1.Figure 7
Raw AE signal due to VL through semicracked intake valve in cylinder 2.Figure 8
Raw AE signal due to VL through notched exhaust valve in cylinder 3.Raw AE signal due to leakage through lifted valve in cylinder 4. (a) 0.1 mm lifted exhaust valve and (b) 0.1 mm lifted intake valve.
(a)
(b)Figure 10
Raw AE signal relate to healthy valves with no leakage in cylinder 4.Equation (1) shows that the acoustic power level was proportional to v
8, which means that acoustic power level was strongly dependent on leakage velocity; therefore, an increase in the leakage rate caused a very clear change in AE signal amplitude.In all cases, it was observed that AE signals were typically continuous and the amplitude of the AE signal increased as the inlet pressure increased. Figures6–8 show the results for semicracked and notched valves in cylinders 1–3. It can be seen that the AE signals were very similar in wave form and amplitude; thus, it was not easy to distinguish between signals produced by different faults.Figure9 shows the results for the lifted valves in cylinder 4 and indicates that the signals have only a slightly different wave. It can be seen that the AE signals recorded from the exhaust and intake lifted valves are almost the same.The signals in Figure10 can be regarded as basic AE amplitudes for VL and are related to the existence of compressed air in the cylinder chamber, the test setup, environment, and background noise.


## 3.3. Frequency Domain Signal Analysis

Frequency analysis of the AE signal from the VL shows the energy distribution of the signal in the frequency domain. Figures11, 12, 13, and 14 show the power spectral density (PSD) of the signals shown in Figures 6–9. Frequency analysis of the AE signals demonstrates that gas leakage generates broadband AE signal. Moreover comparing Figure 15 for the spectrum of healthy valves with those in Figures 11–14 shows that there are some picks in the spectrum of faulty valves, while these do not exist in healthy ones.Figure 11
Power spectral density of raw AE signal due to VL through semicracked exhaust valve in cylinder 1 versus time at 1–6 bar by sensor number 1.Figure 12
Power spectral density of raw AE signal due to VL through semicracked intake valve in cylinder 2.Figure 13
Power spectral density of raw AE signal due to VL through notched exhaust valve in cylinder 3.Power spectral density of raw AE signal due to VL through 0.1 mm lifted valve in cylinder 4. (a) Exhaust valve and (b) intake valve.
(a)
(b)Figure 15
Power spectral density of raw AE signal for healthy valves with no leakage in cylinder 4.In Figures11–13, the frequency analysis of AE signals for semicracked and notched valves exhibited similar behavior, as would be expected from their waveforms in Figures 6–8. Figure 14 shows the results of frequency analysis of the AE signal from the exhaust and intake VL of cylinder 4. It can be seen that both exhaust and intake were very similar in their PSD analyses. Figure 15 presents the PSD analysis of the AE signal recorded for healthy valves with no leakage.Although the frequency analysis detected the healthy and simulated faulty valves in the frequency domain, this method faced difficulties in showing a clear difference between the types of defective valves. For example, it was difficult to distinguish between the semicracked and notched valves. Separating the different types of faults requires an expert and systematic method. An artificial neural network (ANN) based on AE parameters extracted from raw AE signals was utilized for this stage. The parameters were the AE basic parameters: AErms, count, absolute AE energy, maximum signal amplitude, and average signal level.


## 4. Artificial Neural Network for Determining Valve Fault Type

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) can identify correlated patterns between the input data set and corresponding target values. ANNs have good ability for prediction, pattern recognition, data compression, and decision-making [22]. Figure 16 shows a model of an artificial neuron.Figure 16
Artificial Neuron model.ANN was adopted to use five parameters (AErms, count, absolute AE energy, maximum signal amplitude, average signal level) to identify valve fault type. The input layer consisted of five nodes corresponding to the five input features. The hidden layer had six nodes and the output layer had six nodes, of which five nodes represent the valve fault type and one node is reserved for the healthy condition. The output of each node is defined by the following sigmoid function:
(3)
F
(
net
i
)
=
F
(
∑
j
w
i
j
o
i
j
)
,
F
(
s
)
=
1
1
-
e
-
s
,
where net is the training data, w is the vector of weights, o is vector of inputs, and F
(
s
) is the transfer function.The backpropagation method was used to learn the weights between each pair of nodes. The total data set for each class was comprised of 200 data samples, and each data sample wa comprised of 40,000 data points. The 200 data samples were randomly divided into two equal groups, one for training and one for testing. Table1 shows the output condition.Table 1
Output condition meaning.
Node number
Valve fault type
O1
Cylinder 4, healthy valves, no leakage at zero valve lift
O2
Cylinder 1, semicracked exhaust valve
O3
Cylinder 2, semicracked intake valve
O4
Cylinder 3, notched exhaust valve
O5
Cylinder 4, valve clearance, exhaust valve lift
O6
Cylinder 4, valve clearance, intake valve liftFigure17 is a sample that shows the efficiency of maximum amplitude, AErms, and count in classifying the six classes of valve condition. As seen, some valve faults can be categorized visually, but other classes have very similar properties. A more efficient expert system is necessary to classify them with high performance.Figure 17
Three features of AE signal in 4 bar inlet pressure.Table2 presents the confusion matrix of the ANN method. The confusion matrix shows that ANN model was able to classify AE signals correctly. The most significant issue for a trained expert system is that the classifier may detect a fault signal from a healthy signal. Table 2 shows that ANN detected faulty and healthy valves properly. All faulty signals were distinguished correctly from healthy signals. The ANN expert system performed well in differentiating the fault type of the valves. For example, it separated the semicracked exhaust valve (class O2) from the other faulty classes (classes from O3 to O6) intelligently. It can be seen from Figure 17 that O5 and O6 have very close properties and the ability of the expert system in distinguishing between O5 and O6 was lower than other classes.Table 2
Confusion matrix of testing data for ANN.
Valve condition
Pressure (bar)
O1
O2
O3
O4
O5
O6
Sensitivity (%)
Valve condition
O1
O2
O3
O4
O5
O6
Sensitivity (%)
O1
1
100
0
0
0
0
0
100
O4
0
3
0
97
0
0
100
2
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
3
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
4
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
5
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
6
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
O2
1
0
98
1
1
0
0
99
O5
0
0
0
0
88
12
79
2
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
67
33
3
0
98
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
75
25
4
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
86
14
5
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
88
12
6
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
69
31
O3
1
0
1
99
0
0
0
100
O6
0
0
0
0
7
93
75
2
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
27
73
3
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
39
61
4
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
28
72
5
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
78
6
0
2
98
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
27
73
Total average performance of ANN: 92%


## 5. Conclusion

This study constructed an expert system based on acoustic emission data to distinguish between valve fault types. Three valve faults (cracked valve, notched valve, and valve clearance) were simulated and used in the cylinder head of an internal combustion gasoline engine. It was shown that using time and frequency domain analysis only detects the difference between faulty and healthy valves. Healthy valves have no leakage and their AE signals have low amplitude. In order to distinguish between the fault types in valves, an ANN was used based on AE features. It was trained using five AE parameters (AErms, count, absolute AE energy, maximum signal amplitude, and average signal level) for fault separation. These parameters had very good correlation with valve leakage and ANN was well trained using random segmented data. The results from this expert system showed good performance (over 92%) in distinguishing between faulty and healthy valves and fault types.



---

*Source: 823514-2014-02-25.xml*