# Erratum for “Assessment of LWR-HTR-GCFR Integrated Cycle”

Authors: Eleonora Bomboni; Nicola Cerullo; Guglielmo Lomonaco
Journal: Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
 (2009)

---

## Body

## Assessment of LWR-HTR-GCFR Integrated Cycle

Erratum
Please substitute the old Figure10 with the following new Figure 1, the old Figure 11 with the following new Figure 2, Please substitute the old Figure 18 with the following new Figure 3, the old Figure 25 with the following new Figure 4, and  the paragraph (i) at page 8, column 2, with the following:
“First of all, the LOMBT is always lower than 50000 years. GCFR SNF reaches LOM after about 10000 except for the 1st and the 2nd cycle (Figures12 and 17). As far as PBMR is concerned, its waste composed of Am, Cm and FPs is characterized by a LOMBT three time higher than that of the average GCFR waste (Figure 10). Furthermore, considering all the HM coming from PBMR as a waste (i.e., including Np and Pu; that corresponds to a OTTO cycle for PBMR), the LOMBT increases by two orders of magnitude (please compare Figures 10 and 11) and becomes even worse than that of LWR waste. Hence, the advantages of recycling Pu and Np coming from PBMR are confirmed.”Figure 1Figure 2Figure 3Figure 4



---

*Source: 815394-2010-06-27.xml*