# Dissemination of Extended-Spectrumβ-Lactamase- and AmpC β-Lactamase-ProducingEscherichia coli within the Food Distribution System of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Authors: Do Phuc Nguyen; Thi Anh Dao Nguyen; Thi Hien Le; Nguyen Minh Doan Tran; Thanh Phong Ngo; Van Chinh Dang; Takao Kawai; Masashi Kanki; Ryuji Kawahara; Michio Jinnai; Shinya Yonogi; Yuji Hirai; Yoshimasa Yamamoto; Yuko Kumeda
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

To investigate the dissemination of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli within the food distribution system of Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), Vietnam, the prevalence of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. colistrains in chicken meat, pork, beef, and fish/shrimp samples obtained from slaughterhouses, a wholesale market, and supermarkets was examined. Among the total of 330 collected food samples, ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli was detected in 150 samples (45.5%). The highest prevalence of these isolates was in chicken meat (76/82, 92.7%), followed by pork (32/92, 34.8%), beef (18/74, 34.3%), and fish/shrimp (24/82, 29.3%). A total of 342 strains of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli were isolated from 150 positive food samples. The most prevalent genes responsible for ESBL or pAmpC activity belonged to the CTX-M-9 (110/342, 31.2%), CTX-M-1 (102/342, 29.8%), and CIT (118/342, 34.5%) groups. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the high occurrence of pAmpC (37.1%) in animal-based food in Vietnam. Among the 342 total ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli isolates, 276 (80.7%) were resistant to at least 6 antibiotic agents. Notably, high percentages of resistance to ciprofloxacin and fosfomycin were found in isolates from chicken (80.5% and 50.8%, resp.). These findings demonstrate that animal-based food products in HCMC represent a major reservoir of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Strains of extended-spectrumβ-lactamase- (ESBL-) and plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamase- (pAmpC-) producingEscherichia coli pose a threat to public health because of their ability to hydrolyze third-generation cephalosporins, which are commonly used to treat serious infections caused by members of the Enterobacteriaceae family. Such drug resistance is likely acquired byE. colistrains colonizing the gastrointestinal tract of animals, as well as humans, treated with and/or fed antimicrobial agents, including cephalosporins.Recently, a high prevalence of ESBL-producingE. coli was reported in healthy individuals in Southeast Asia, including China (65.0%) [1], Thailand (58.2%–69.3%) [2], and Vietnam (51.0%) [3], and among healthy tourists traveling from the Netherlands to East and South Asia (67% and 72%, resp.) [4]. These colonization percentages suggest that ESBL-producingE. coli has the potential to be transmitted from food-producing animals to humans via the food chain. However, the extent to which animal-based food products contribute to the dissemination of ESBL-producingE. coli strains to human populations in Southeast Asia has not yet been investigated. Furthermore, no data regarding the prevalence of pAmpC-producingE. coli strains in food in Southeast Asia is available.In the present study, we investigated the prevalence of ESBL- and/or pAmpC-producingE. coli strains in chicken, pork, beef, and fish/shrimp samples collected from within the food distribution system of Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC). HCMC was selected because it is the most-populated city in Vietnam and contains the highest number of supermarkets. In addition, HCMC contains large-scale slaughterhouses for poultry, pigs, and cattle and also large wholesale markets for fish and shrimp.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Sampling

The food samples used in this study were collected from 4 slaughterhouses (1 poultry, 2 pig, and 1 beef cattle), a wholesale market (fish/shrimp), and 8 supermarkets in HCMC between October 2012 and March 2014. The poultry slaughterhouse was used by several companies and has a processing capacity of approximately 60,000 chickens per day. The beef slaughterhouse has a processing capacity of 40 head of cattle per day. One pork slaughterhouse has a capacity of 1,000 animals per day and the second was located in a suburban area of HCMC and slaughters 200 pigs per day. All chickens and pigs were raised domestically in regions surrounding HCMC, mainly Can Tho City, which is located along the Mekong delta, whereas all beef cattle were imported live from Australia for slaughter. The wholesale fish market was one of the largest in Vietnam, with an average merchandise capacity of 1,000 tons of seafood per day. Among the various types of seafood sold at the market, cultured fish and shrimp were selected for sampling in this study. Nearly all of the meat and fish products processed at these slaughterhouses and wholesale market are transferred to retail supermarkets within HCMC. For the present study, eight large retail supermarkets located in districts 7, 10, and 11 in HCMC were selected for food sampling. For each slaughterhouse, wholesale market, and supermarket, 5–10 food products (>100 g/sample) were randomly selected for sampling. The sampling procedure was performed two to four times in different months (March, June, August, and December). In pork and beef slaughterhouses, lateral muscles of the neck of carcasses were collected as samples. A total of 332 samples were collected from chicken (n
=
82), pork (n
=
96), beef (n
=
72), and fish/shrimp (n
=
82).


### 2.2. Bacterial Isolation

ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli strains were detected from food samples using an enrichment procedure [5]. Briefly, approximately 25 g of each sample was incubated in 225 mL buffered peptone water (BPW; Oxoid, Basingstoke, England) at 35°C for 18–22 h. Loopful aliquots from the BPW cultures were inoculated onto CHROMagar ECC plates (CHROMagar, Paris, France) supplemented with 1 μg/mL cefotaxime and were further incubated at 35°C for 22
±
2 h. Three blue colonies on each plate were picked, isolated, and identified asE. coli using conventional biochemical tests, including Triple Sugar Iron slants (Nissui, Tokyo, Japan), Lysine Indole Motility medium (Nissui, Tokyo), and Cellobiose Lactose Indole β-Glucuronidase medium (Kyokuto Pharmaceutical Industrial, Tokyo, Japan) [6]. These isolates were subjected to further study.


### 2.3. ESBL and pAmpC Phenotyping and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

ESBL phenotypes were confirmed by the double-disk diffusion test using cefotaxime and ceftazidime with and without clavulanic acid, as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI).Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed by the disk diffusion method according to the Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (M100-S23) developed by the CLSI. The antimicrobial agents used in the assay were obtained from BD Biosciences and consisted of ampicillin, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, meropenem, nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, streptomycin, kanamycin, gentamycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, and fosfomycin. The susceptibilities of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli isolates to each antimicrobial agent were categorized as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant according to the CLSI criteria. AmpC phenotypes were estimated based on antimicrobial susceptibility to cefoxitin.


### 2.4. Genotypic Characterization

To screen for the genes responsible for ESBL activity, multiplex PCR analysis was performed for the simultaneous detection ofb
l
a
CTX-M, b
l
a
TEM, and b
l
a
SHV genes. The primers used for PCR amplification were described in a previous study [7].E. coli isolates with the ESBL phenotype were classified into the following gene groups: b
l
a
CTX-M positive and b
l
a
TEM and/or b
l
a
SHV positive, but b
l
a
CTX-M negative. The presence of pAmpC genes responsible for the AmpC phenotype was detected by multiplex PCR, as described by [8]. b
l
a
TEM genes were identified by sequencing, as previously described [9], and b
l
a
SHV genes were also identified by sequencing with primers designed in this study (5′-CACTCAAGGATGTATTGTGGTTATGC-3′ and 5′-GCTACGAGCCGGATAACGC-3′).Phylogenetic grouping of theE. coli isolates was determined using a PCR method for three genetic markers,chuA,yjaA, andTspE4.C2, as described by Clermont et al. [10].To investigate the epidemiological relationships among the ESBL-producingE. coli isolates, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed with XbaI (Promega, Japan), as described previously [11]. For the PFGE analysis, five representative strains were selected among isolates of the CTX-M-9 group (phylogenetic group D) having the same phenotypic and genotypic characters, including resistance to the same 9 antibiotic agents. Of the 5 isolates, 4 were isolated from pork (n
=
2) and beef samples (n
=
2, block and ground meat) collected from the same supermarket on the same day. The other was isolated from a chicken sample collected from a different supermarket.


### 2.5. Statistical Analysis

Fisher’s exact test was used to verify that differences between data sets were significant. Ap value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using R environment software with the pwr package (js-STAR 2012, http://www.kisnet.or.jp/nappa/software/star/).


## 2.1. Sampling

The food samples used in this study were collected from 4 slaughterhouses (1 poultry, 2 pig, and 1 beef cattle), a wholesale market (fish/shrimp), and 8 supermarkets in HCMC between October 2012 and March 2014. The poultry slaughterhouse was used by several companies and has a processing capacity of approximately 60,000 chickens per day. The beef slaughterhouse has a processing capacity of 40 head of cattle per day. One pork slaughterhouse has a capacity of 1,000 animals per day and the second was located in a suburban area of HCMC and slaughters 200 pigs per day. All chickens and pigs were raised domestically in regions surrounding HCMC, mainly Can Tho City, which is located along the Mekong delta, whereas all beef cattle were imported live from Australia for slaughter. The wholesale fish market was one of the largest in Vietnam, with an average merchandise capacity of 1,000 tons of seafood per day. Among the various types of seafood sold at the market, cultured fish and shrimp were selected for sampling in this study. Nearly all of the meat and fish products processed at these slaughterhouses and wholesale market are transferred to retail supermarkets within HCMC. For the present study, eight large retail supermarkets located in districts 7, 10, and 11 in HCMC were selected for food sampling. For each slaughterhouse, wholesale market, and supermarket, 5–10 food products (>100 g/sample) were randomly selected for sampling. The sampling procedure was performed two to four times in different months (March, June, August, and December). In pork and beef slaughterhouses, lateral muscles of the neck of carcasses were collected as samples. A total of 332 samples were collected from chicken (n
=
82), pork (n
=
96), beef (n
=
72), and fish/shrimp (n
=
82).


## 2.2. Bacterial Isolation

ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli strains were detected from food samples using an enrichment procedure [5]. Briefly, approximately 25 g of each sample was incubated in 225 mL buffered peptone water (BPW; Oxoid, Basingstoke, England) at 35°C for 18–22 h. Loopful aliquots from the BPW cultures were inoculated onto CHROMagar ECC plates (CHROMagar, Paris, France) supplemented with 1 μg/mL cefotaxime and were further incubated at 35°C for 22
±
2 h. Three blue colonies on each plate were picked, isolated, and identified asE. coli using conventional biochemical tests, including Triple Sugar Iron slants (Nissui, Tokyo, Japan), Lysine Indole Motility medium (Nissui, Tokyo), and Cellobiose Lactose Indole β-Glucuronidase medium (Kyokuto Pharmaceutical Industrial, Tokyo, Japan) [6]. These isolates were subjected to further study.


## 2.3. ESBL and pAmpC Phenotyping and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

ESBL phenotypes were confirmed by the double-disk diffusion test using cefotaxime and ceftazidime with and without clavulanic acid, as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI).Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed by the disk diffusion method according to the Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (M100-S23) developed by the CLSI. The antimicrobial agents used in the assay were obtained from BD Biosciences and consisted of ampicillin, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, meropenem, nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, streptomycin, kanamycin, gentamycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, and fosfomycin. The susceptibilities of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli isolates to each antimicrobial agent were categorized as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant according to the CLSI criteria. AmpC phenotypes were estimated based on antimicrobial susceptibility to cefoxitin.


## 2.4. Genotypic Characterization

To screen for the genes responsible for ESBL activity, multiplex PCR analysis was performed for the simultaneous detection ofb
l
a
CTX-M, b
l
a
TEM, and b
l
a
SHV genes. The primers used for PCR amplification were described in a previous study [7].E. coli isolates with the ESBL phenotype were classified into the following gene groups: b
l
a
CTX-M positive and b
l
a
TEM and/or b
l
a
SHV positive, but b
l
a
CTX-M negative. The presence of pAmpC genes responsible for the AmpC phenotype was detected by multiplex PCR, as described by [8]. b
l
a
TEM genes were identified by sequencing, as previously described [9], and b
l
a
SHV genes were also identified by sequencing with primers designed in this study (5′-CACTCAAGGATGTATTGTGGTTATGC-3′ and 5′-GCTACGAGCCGGATAACGC-3′).Phylogenetic grouping of theE. coli isolates was determined using a PCR method for three genetic markers,chuA,yjaA, andTspE4.C2, as described by Clermont et al. [10].To investigate the epidemiological relationships among the ESBL-producingE. coli isolates, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed with XbaI (Promega, Japan), as described previously [11]. For the PFGE analysis, five representative strains were selected among isolates of the CTX-M-9 group (phylogenetic group D) having the same phenotypic and genotypic characters, including resistance to the same 9 antibiotic agents. Of the 5 isolates, 4 were isolated from pork (n
=
2) and beef samples (n
=
2, block and ground meat) collected from the same supermarket on the same day. The other was isolated from a chicken sample collected from a different supermarket.


## 2.5. Statistical Analysis

Fisher’s exact test was used to verify that differences between data sets were significant. Ap value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using R environment software with the pwr package (js-STAR 2012, http://www.kisnet.or.jp/nappa/software/star/).


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Prevalence of ESBL/pAmpC-ProducingE. coli

A total of 330 food samples were collected from slaughterhouses, wholesale markets, and supermarkets within the HCMC food distribution network. Strains of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli were detected in 150 samples (45.5%). The highest prevalence of positive isolates was in chicken meat (76/82, 92.7%), followed by pork (32/92, 34.8%), beef (18/74, 34.3%), and fish/shrimp (24/82, 29.3%), as shown in Table 1.Table 1
Prevalence of ESBL/AmpC-E. coli in food obtained from slaughterhouses or a wholesale market and supermarkets (2012 October–2014 March).
Food
Place
Number of samples
ESBL/AmpC-E. coli
Positive
p valuea
ORb, CIc
Chicken
82
76 (92.7%)
Slaughterhouse
40
40 (100%)
p
<
0.05
OR = 14.42
Supermarket
42
36 (85.7%)
CI (0.78–265.07)
Pork
92
32 (34.8%)
Slaughterhouse
50
11 (22.0%)
p
<
0.01
OR = 0.28
Supermarket
42
21 (50.0%)
CI (0.11–0.70)
Beef
74
18 (34.3%)
Slaughterhouse
30
0 (0%)
p
<
0.001
OR = 0.02
Supermarket
44
18 (40.9%)
CI (0.00–0.41)
Fish
82
24 (29.3%)
Wholesale market
40
13 (32.5%)
p
>
0.10
OR = 1.36
Supermarket
42
11 (26.2%)
CI (0.52–3.52)
Total
330
150 (45.5%)
aFisher’s exact test.
bOdds ratio.
c95% confidence interval.Among the samples of chicken meat, ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli was more frequently detected in the samples obtained from the slaughterhouses (100%) than those collected from supermarkets (85.7%, p
<
0.05). In contrast, for pork and beef meat, ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coliwas more often detected in samples obtained from supermarkets (pork, 50.0%; beef, 40.9%) than in those from slaughterhouses (pork: 22.0%; beef: 0%; p
<
0.01 and p
<
0.001, resp.). Among samples of fish/shrimp, no marked differences in the percentages of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli detection were found between samples collected from the wholesale market (32.5%) and supermarkets (26.2%) (p
>
0.10).


### 3.2. Genetic Characterization of ESBL/pAmpC-ProducingE. coli

A total of 342 strains of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli were isolated from 150 positive food samples. The most prevalentbla genes responsible for ESBL activity belonged to the CTX-M-9 (110/342, 31.2%) and CTX-M-1 (102/342, 29.8%) groups, whereas the most prevalentbla gene responsible for pAmpC β-lactamase activity belonged to the CIT group (118/342, 34.5%). Genes of these three major groups were detected in the isolates from all types of examined food, although CTX-M-2, CTX-M-8, and CTX-M-25 groupbla genes were not detected (Table 2). In addition, isolates containing b
l
a
TEM genes and either CTX-M-9 (51.8%), CTX-M-1 (74.5%), or CIT group genes (80.5%) were frequently detected. The b
l
a
TEM genes of 10 randomly selected isolates were sequenced and all were identified as belonging to b
l
a
TEM-1, which encodes penicillinase. Two isolates from chicken samples harbored both CTX-M-1 and CIT group genes. The b
l
a
SHV12 gene was detected in 2 isolates from 2 beef samples and was also found together with the b
l
a
TEM135 gene in one isolate from a chicken sample. The DHA group gene was found in 8 isolates from 6 fish samples, including goby, anabas, swamp eel, red snakehead, and catfish, in addition to one isolate from a chicken sample.Table 2
Distribution ofβ-lactamase genes in ESBL/AmpC-producing E. coli isolates (n
=
342) from food.
Food
Sampling place
Number of isolates
ESBL genes
pAmpC genes
⁢CTX-M-9 group
⁢CTX-M-1 group
⁢SHV12
⁢CIT group
⁢DHA
−
+TEMa
−
+TEMa
+CIT group
−
+TEMb
−
+TEMa
−
+TEMa
Chicken
185
⁢44 (23.8%)
⁢62 (33.5%)
⁢1 (0.5%)
⁢77 (41.6%)
⁢1 (0.5%)
Slaughterhouse
111
6
19
0
22
0
0
1
11
52
1
0
Supermarkets
73
5
14
8
30
2
0
0
1
13
0
0
Pork
75
⁢41 (54.7%)
⁢15 (20.0%)
⁢0 (0%)
⁢19 (25.3%)
⁢0 (0%)
Slaughterhouse
31
11
11
3
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
Supermarkets
44
14
5
2
10
0
0
0
3
10
0
0
Beef
38
⁢12 (31.6%)
⁢10 (26.3%)
⁢2 (3.4%)
⁢14 (36.8%)
⁢0 (0%)
Slaughterhouse
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Supermarkets
38
9
3
4
6
0
2
0
5
9
0
0
Fish
44
⁢13 (29.5%)
⁢15 (34.1%)
⁢0 (0%)
⁢8 (18.2%)
⁢8 (18.2%)
Wholesale market
24
3
2
7
5
0
0
0
2
2
2
1
Supermarkets
20
5
3
0
3
0
0
0
1
3
2
3
Total (number of isolates)
342
⁢110 (31.2%)
⁢102 (29.8%)
⁢3 (0.9%)
⁢118 (34.5%)
⁢9 (2.6%)
a10 tested isolates harbored TEM-1 gene.
bOne isolate harbored TEM-135 gene.Phylogenetic analysis showed that group B1 (42.1–45.3%) was the most prevalent among isolates from chicken, pork, and beef, whereas group A (52.3%) was predominant among isolates from fish/shrimp (Figure1). Phylogenetic group B1 was most frequently detected among all isolates (145/342, 42.4%), followed by groups A (123/342, 36.0%) and D (68/342, 19.9%). As expected, phylogenetic group B2 (6/342, 1.8%) was detected at low frequency among isolates from all food types. Although the phylogenetic groups were not linked to definite CTX-M group or resistance patterns, 5 of the 6 isolates that belonged to clinically relevant B2 group [12] were found to contain pAmpC genes.Figure 1
Phylogenetic group distribution of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. colifrom food (n
=
342).


### 3.3. Antibiotic Resistance Profiles of ESBL/pAmpC-ProducingE. coli Isolates

The antibiotic resistance profiles of all 342 ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli isolates are shown in Table 3. High percentages of resistance to ampicillin (100%), tetracycline (94.4%), cefotaxime (88.6%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (83.6%), streptomycin (83.3%), nalidixic acid (80.4%), and chloramphenicol (79.2%) and a relatively low rate of resistance to ceftazidime (24.6%) were observed among isolates from all food types. In addition, the isolates exhibited high percentages of resistance to ciprofloxacin and fosfomycin but displayed marked variability in resistance between the different food types. In particular, the percentages of resistance to ciprofloxacin and fosfomycin were significantly higher in isolates from chicken (80.5% and 50.8%, resp.) and fish/shrimp (68.2% and 20.8%, resp.) compared to pork (42.7% and 13.3%, resp.) and beef (39.5% and 0%, resp.). Notably, all isolates exhibited susceptibility to meropenem.Table 3
Antibiotic resistance profiles of ESBL/AmpC-producingE. coli isolates from food (n
=
324).
Chicken
Pork
Beef
Fish
Total
Ampicillin (AMP)
185 (100)
75 (100)
38 (100)
44 (100)
342 (100)
Cefoxitin (CFX)
84 (45.4)
19 (25.3)
14 (36.8)
15 (34.1)
132 (38.6)
Cefotaxime (CTX)
166 (89.7)
68 (90.7)
33 (86.8)
36 (81.8)
303 (88.6)
Ceftazidime (CAZ)
54 (29.2)
10 (13.3)
8 (21.1)
12 (27.3)
84 (24.6)
Meropenem (MEM)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
Nalidixic acid (NA)
170 (91.9)
47 (62.7)
25 (65.8)
33 (75.0)
275 (80.4)
Ciprofloxacin (CPFX)
149 (80.5)
32 (42.7)
15 (39.5)
30 (68.2)
226 (66.1)
Streptomycin (SM)
176 (95.1)
52 (69.3)
32 (84.2)
37 (84.1)
285 (83.3)
Kanamycin (KM)
127 (68.6)
32 (42.7)
6 (15.8)
20 (45.5)
185 (54.1)
Gentamicin (GM)
109 (58.9)
44 (58.7)
11 (28.9)
14 (31.8)
175 (52.0)
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (ST)
164 (88.7)
52 (69.3)
32 (84.2)
38 (86.4)
286 (83.6)
Tetracycline (TC)
176 (95.1)
71 (94.7)
37 (97.3)
39 (88.6)
323 (94.4)
Chloramphenicol (CP)
156 (84.3)
61 (81.3)
27 (71.1)
27 (61.4)
271 (79.2)
Fosfomycin (FOM)
94 (50.8)
10 (13.3)
0 (0)
9 (20.5)
113 (33.0)The distribution of multidrug-resistantE. coli isolates from the four food types is shown in Figure 2. Of the 342 isolates, 276 isolates (80.7%) were resistant to at least 6 antibiotic agents and 185 isolates (54.1%) were resistant to at least 10 antibiotic agents. One isolate each from chicken and fish samples was resistant to all 13 tested antibiotics, with the exception of meropenem.Figure 2
Multidrug-resistance distribution among food isolates of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli (n
=
342).


### 3.4. PFGE Profiling

The PFGE analysis revealed that ESBL-producingE. coli isolates from 2 pork and 2 beef samples collected from the same supermarket on the same day showed an identical PFGE pattern (lanes 2, 3, 4, and 5, Figure 3). In addition, an ESBL-producingE. coli isolate obtained from a chicken sample that was collected from a different supermarket showed a distinct PFGE pattern (lane 1, Figure 3).Figure 3
PFGE patterns of ESBL-producingE. coli isolates from meat samples in supermarkets. Lanes: 1,E. coliisolate from chicken sample collected from a supermarket located in district 10; M,Salmonella entericaserovar Braenderup H9812 (a size marker); 2,E. coliisolate from a pork block sample; 3,E. coliisolate from ground pork sample; 4,E. coliisolate from a beef block sample; 5,E. coliisolate from ground beef sample; 2–5, isolates from samples collected from the same supermarket located in district 7 on the same day.


## 3.1. Prevalence of ESBL/pAmpC-ProducingE. coli

A total of 330 food samples were collected from slaughterhouses, wholesale markets, and supermarkets within the HCMC food distribution network. Strains of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli were detected in 150 samples (45.5%). The highest prevalence of positive isolates was in chicken meat (76/82, 92.7%), followed by pork (32/92, 34.8%), beef (18/74, 34.3%), and fish/shrimp (24/82, 29.3%), as shown in Table 1.Table 1
Prevalence of ESBL/AmpC-E. coli in food obtained from slaughterhouses or a wholesale market and supermarkets (2012 October–2014 March).
Food
Place
Number of samples
ESBL/AmpC-E. coli
Positive
p valuea
ORb, CIc
Chicken
82
76 (92.7%)
Slaughterhouse
40
40 (100%)
p
<
0.05
OR = 14.42
Supermarket
42
36 (85.7%)
CI (0.78–265.07)
Pork
92
32 (34.8%)
Slaughterhouse
50
11 (22.0%)
p
<
0.01
OR = 0.28
Supermarket
42
21 (50.0%)
CI (0.11–0.70)
Beef
74
18 (34.3%)
Slaughterhouse
30
0 (0%)
p
<
0.001
OR = 0.02
Supermarket
44
18 (40.9%)
CI (0.00–0.41)
Fish
82
24 (29.3%)
Wholesale market
40
13 (32.5%)
p
>
0.10
OR = 1.36
Supermarket
42
11 (26.2%)
CI (0.52–3.52)
Total
330
150 (45.5%)
aFisher’s exact test.
bOdds ratio.
c95% confidence interval.Among the samples of chicken meat, ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli was more frequently detected in the samples obtained from the slaughterhouses (100%) than those collected from supermarkets (85.7%, p
<
0.05). In contrast, for pork and beef meat, ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coliwas more often detected in samples obtained from supermarkets (pork, 50.0%; beef, 40.9%) than in those from slaughterhouses (pork: 22.0%; beef: 0%; p
<
0.01 and p
<
0.001, resp.). Among samples of fish/shrimp, no marked differences in the percentages of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli detection were found between samples collected from the wholesale market (32.5%) and supermarkets (26.2%) (p
>
0.10).


## 3.2. Genetic Characterization of ESBL/pAmpC-ProducingE. coli

A total of 342 strains of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli were isolated from 150 positive food samples. The most prevalentbla genes responsible for ESBL activity belonged to the CTX-M-9 (110/342, 31.2%) and CTX-M-1 (102/342, 29.8%) groups, whereas the most prevalentbla gene responsible for pAmpC β-lactamase activity belonged to the CIT group (118/342, 34.5%). Genes of these three major groups were detected in the isolates from all types of examined food, although CTX-M-2, CTX-M-8, and CTX-M-25 groupbla genes were not detected (Table 2). In addition, isolates containing b
l
a
TEM genes and either CTX-M-9 (51.8%), CTX-M-1 (74.5%), or CIT group genes (80.5%) were frequently detected. The b
l
a
TEM genes of 10 randomly selected isolates were sequenced and all were identified as belonging to b
l
a
TEM-1, which encodes penicillinase. Two isolates from chicken samples harbored both CTX-M-1 and CIT group genes. The b
l
a
SHV12 gene was detected in 2 isolates from 2 beef samples and was also found together with the b
l
a
TEM135 gene in one isolate from a chicken sample. The DHA group gene was found in 8 isolates from 6 fish samples, including goby, anabas, swamp eel, red snakehead, and catfish, in addition to one isolate from a chicken sample.Table 2
Distribution ofβ-lactamase genes in ESBL/AmpC-producing E. coli isolates (n
=
342) from food.
Food
Sampling place
Number of isolates
ESBL genes
pAmpC genes
⁢CTX-M-9 group
⁢CTX-M-1 group
⁢SHV12
⁢CIT group
⁢DHA
−
+TEMa
−
+TEMa
+CIT group
−
+TEMb
−
+TEMa
−
+TEMa
Chicken
185
⁢44 (23.8%)
⁢62 (33.5%)
⁢1 (0.5%)
⁢77 (41.6%)
⁢1 (0.5%)
Slaughterhouse
111
6
19
0
22
0
0
1
11
52
1
0
Supermarkets
73
5
14
8
30
2
0
0
1
13
0
0
Pork
75
⁢41 (54.7%)
⁢15 (20.0%)
⁢0 (0%)
⁢19 (25.3%)
⁢0 (0%)
Slaughterhouse
31
11
11
3
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
Supermarkets
44
14
5
2
10
0
0
0
3
10
0
0
Beef
38
⁢12 (31.6%)
⁢10 (26.3%)
⁢2 (3.4%)
⁢14 (36.8%)
⁢0 (0%)
Slaughterhouse
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Supermarkets
38
9
3
4
6
0
2
0
5
9
0
0
Fish
44
⁢13 (29.5%)
⁢15 (34.1%)
⁢0 (0%)
⁢8 (18.2%)
⁢8 (18.2%)
Wholesale market
24
3
2
7
5
0
0
0
2
2
2
1
Supermarkets
20
5
3
0
3
0
0
0
1
3
2
3
Total (number of isolates)
342
⁢110 (31.2%)
⁢102 (29.8%)
⁢3 (0.9%)
⁢118 (34.5%)
⁢9 (2.6%)
a10 tested isolates harbored TEM-1 gene.
bOne isolate harbored TEM-135 gene.Phylogenetic analysis showed that group B1 (42.1–45.3%) was the most prevalent among isolates from chicken, pork, and beef, whereas group A (52.3%) was predominant among isolates from fish/shrimp (Figure1). Phylogenetic group B1 was most frequently detected among all isolates (145/342, 42.4%), followed by groups A (123/342, 36.0%) and D (68/342, 19.9%). As expected, phylogenetic group B2 (6/342, 1.8%) was detected at low frequency among isolates from all food types. Although the phylogenetic groups were not linked to definite CTX-M group or resistance patterns, 5 of the 6 isolates that belonged to clinically relevant B2 group [12] were found to contain pAmpC genes.Figure 1
Phylogenetic group distribution of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. colifrom food (n
=
342).


## 3.3. Antibiotic Resistance Profiles of ESBL/pAmpC-ProducingE. coli Isolates

The antibiotic resistance profiles of all 342 ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli isolates are shown in Table 3. High percentages of resistance to ampicillin (100%), tetracycline (94.4%), cefotaxime (88.6%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (83.6%), streptomycin (83.3%), nalidixic acid (80.4%), and chloramphenicol (79.2%) and a relatively low rate of resistance to ceftazidime (24.6%) were observed among isolates from all food types. In addition, the isolates exhibited high percentages of resistance to ciprofloxacin and fosfomycin but displayed marked variability in resistance between the different food types. In particular, the percentages of resistance to ciprofloxacin and fosfomycin were significantly higher in isolates from chicken (80.5% and 50.8%, resp.) and fish/shrimp (68.2% and 20.8%, resp.) compared to pork (42.7% and 13.3%, resp.) and beef (39.5% and 0%, resp.). Notably, all isolates exhibited susceptibility to meropenem.Table 3
Antibiotic resistance profiles of ESBL/AmpC-producingE. coli isolates from food (n
=
324).
Chicken
Pork
Beef
Fish
Total
Ampicillin (AMP)
185 (100)
75 (100)
38 (100)
44 (100)
342 (100)
Cefoxitin (CFX)
84 (45.4)
19 (25.3)
14 (36.8)
15 (34.1)
132 (38.6)
Cefotaxime (CTX)
166 (89.7)
68 (90.7)
33 (86.8)
36 (81.8)
303 (88.6)
Ceftazidime (CAZ)
54 (29.2)
10 (13.3)
8 (21.1)
12 (27.3)
84 (24.6)
Meropenem (MEM)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
Nalidixic acid (NA)
170 (91.9)
47 (62.7)
25 (65.8)
33 (75.0)
275 (80.4)
Ciprofloxacin (CPFX)
149 (80.5)
32 (42.7)
15 (39.5)
30 (68.2)
226 (66.1)
Streptomycin (SM)
176 (95.1)
52 (69.3)
32 (84.2)
37 (84.1)
285 (83.3)
Kanamycin (KM)
127 (68.6)
32 (42.7)
6 (15.8)
20 (45.5)
185 (54.1)
Gentamicin (GM)
109 (58.9)
44 (58.7)
11 (28.9)
14 (31.8)
175 (52.0)
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (ST)
164 (88.7)
52 (69.3)
32 (84.2)
38 (86.4)
286 (83.6)
Tetracycline (TC)
176 (95.1)
71 (94.7)
37 (97.3)
39 (88.6)
323 (94.4)
Chloramphenicol (CP)
156 (84.3)
61 (81.3)
27 (71.1)
27 (61.4)
271 (79.2)
Fosfomycin (FOM)
94 (50.8)
10 (13.3)
0 (0)
9 (20.5)
113 (33.0)The distribution of multidrug-resistantE. coli isolates from the four food types is shown in Figure 2. Of the 342 isolates, 276 isolates (80.7%) were resistant to at least 6 antibiotic agents and 185 isolates (54.1%) were resistant to at least 10 antibiotic agents. One isolate each from chicken and fish samples was resistant to all 13 tested antibiotics, with the exception of meropenem.Figure 2
Multidrug-resistance distribution among food isolates of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli (n
=
342).


## 3.4. PFGE Profiling

The PFGE analysis revealed that ESBL-producingE. coli isolates from 2 pork and 2 beef samples collected from the same supermarket on the same day showed an identical PFGE pattern (lanes 2, 3, 4, and 5, Figure 3). In addition, an ESBL-producingE. coli isolate obtained from a chicken sample that was collected from a different supermarket showed a distinct PFGE pattern (lane 1, Figure 3).Figure 3
PFGE patterns of ESBL-producingE. coli isolates from meat samples in supermarkets. Lanes: 1,E. coliisolate from chicken sample collected from a supermarket located in district 10; M,Salmonella entericaserovar Braenderup H9812 (a size marker); 2,E. coliisolate from a pork block sample; 3,E. coliisolate from ground pork sample; 4,E. coliisolate from a beef block sample; 5,E. coliisolate from ground beef sample; 2–5, isolates from samples collected from the same supermarket located in district 7 on the same day.


## 4. Discussion

This study was designed to investigate the presence and distribution of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coliamong animal-based foods and elucidate possible risk factors for the spread of these strains in the food distribution system of HCMC. In particular, the percentages of isolation of these strains from samples collected from slaughterhouses or wholesale markets were compared to those from food samples obtained from supermarkets. The results revealed that the dissemination levels of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coliat different points in the food distribution network differ among animal-based food. In chicken meat, the highest prevalence of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli(100%) was found in samples collected from the slaughterhouse. This result was expected, as two recent studies have shown that healthy chickens at European poultry farms frequently carry ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli in their rectum (>80% [13] and 72.5% [14]). Thus, significant fecal contamination with ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli would be expected to occur during slaughter [14]. In particular, fecal bacteria may be readily transferred between chickens via the water-chilling system used in the poultry slaughtering process for aiding in the removal of feathers [15]. The present results suggest that similar cross-contamination events also widely occur in Vietnam and may even be further exacerbated by the lack of sufficient disinfection control practices. Compared to the poultry slaughterhouse samples, the detection rate of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coliin chicken meat was slightly decreased in supermarkets (85.7%, p
<
0.05). In the food distribution system in Vietnam, chicken meat is typically cut, deboned, packed, and frozen for sale in supermarkets. It is therefore likely that the freeze preservation process reduces the number of viable bacteria within the meat.In contrast to chicken meat, a low prevalence of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli strains was detected among pork and beef samples from slaughterhouses (22.0% and 0%, resp.). The lower occurrence of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli in beef and pork compared with chicken meat has been reported in several countries. For example, ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coliisolates were found in 0%–8% of beef samples, 2%–13% of pork samples, and 15%–95% of broiler meat samples from Sweden, depending on the region of origin [16]. Similar data were reported in Danish [17] and Japanese [18] studies. However, Horton et al. [19] reported high fecal carriage of ESBL-producingE. coli in chickens, pigs, and cattle (median levels, chicken: 5,350 CFU/g; pigs: 2,800 CFU/g; and cattle: 100 CFU/g), although the absolute numbers of these resistant isolates and their percentage of the totalE. colipopulation varied widely at an individual level. Taken together, these results suggest that the evisceration processes used in beef and pork slaughterhouses have a significant effect on reducing the contamination of carcasses with ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli. Notably, however, we found that the detection percentages of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli in both pork and beef were significantly increased in samples collected from supermarkets compared to those from slaughterhouses (p
<
0.01 and p
<
0.001, resp.). In addition, the results of the present PFGE analyses demonstrated that cross-contamination occurred between pork and beef products handled within the same supermarket. The high contamination rate of retail meat with antibiotic-resistantE. coli in HCMC was previously reported in pilot studies conducted by Van et al. [20, 21]. The present data indicate that food sanitation practices within the food distribution system of HCMC remain inadequate. To reduce the growth and cross-contamination of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli in pork and beef, improved food management practices, such as temperature control and training for food handlers, are urgently required in HCMC.Our data showed that approximately 30% of farmed fish and shrimp were contaminated with ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli. The contamination rate was higher than expected based on the reported detection percentages of the bacteria (18.3%) from shrimp in local retail stores in Vietnam [7]. In Vietnamese aquaculture, particularly shrimp farming, the excessive use of antibiotics is a growing concern [22]. The present results suggest that such practices may lead to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.The findings from several recent reports support the theory that different CTX-M type lineages dominate in different geographical regions. For example, the CTX-M-1 group genes were reported to be the predominant ESBL genes found within isolates from European countries [17], whereas CTX-M-2 and CTX-M-8 group genes have been mainly detected in South America [16] and Japan [18]. Here, CTX-M-9 and CTX-M-1 groups were the most prevalent CTX-M gene types in the meat and fish samples. Rao et al. [23] and Zheng et al. [24] reported that CTX-M-9 group genes were the most frequently detected from animals and food in China, followed by CTX-M-1 group genes. These findings suggest that food chains, including feed and animals, of China and Vietnam are connected, as the two countries are closely related geographically and have shared economic ties for centuries.To our knowledge, this is the first report of the high occurrence of pAmpC-producingE. coli (37.1%) among animal-based foods in Vietnam. With the exception of European meat, few data regarding the prevalence of pAmpC-producing isolates in food are available [16, 17], and considerably fewer reports have been published on the detection of such isolates in humans and food compared to ESBL-producing isolates, although pAmpC β-lactamase has been detected worldwide in frequently encountered Enterobacteriaceae isolates, such asKlebsiella pneumoniae,K. oxytoca,Proteus mirabilis,Salmonella spp., andE. coli [25]. One possible reason for the different percentages of detection is that the growth of pAmpC-producing bacteria is inhibited on specific detection media for ESBL-producing bacteria, such as chromID ESBL (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Étoile, France) and CHROMagar ESBL plates (CHROMagar, Paris, France) [26]. Furthermore, relatively little attention has been paid to the detection of pAmpC-producing bacteria in clinical laboratories because there are currently no CLSI or other approved criteria, including phenotypic confirmatory tests, for AmpC β-lactamase [27]. These limitations for detection may lead to underestimation of the prevalence of pAmpC-producingE. coli.Our results show that nearly all pAmpC genes detected in isolates from Vietnamese chicken, pork, and beef belong to CIT group genes, which includeb
l
a
CMY-2 gene, a finding that is in agreement with the reported high prevalence of b
l
a
CMY-2 gene in European meat [16, 17]. In addition, DHA group genes, which include b
l
a
DHA-1 gene, were detected among isolates from the fish/shrimp samples at a similar ratio (8/16, 50%) as CIT group genes. The occurrence of DHA group genes was recently reported in clinical and community settings in Netherlands [28, 29]. We also found that DHA group genes were distributed not only among human isolates, but also among isolates from food.Among the isolates of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli detected in the present study, the prevalence of isolates with multidrug-resistance to other classes of antimicrobial agents was particularly high. Approximately 80% of isolates were resistant to at least 6 antibiotic agents, and two isolates from chicken and fish samples were resistant to all tested antibiotics, with the exception of meropenem. In addition, multidrug-resistant ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli with ciprofloxacin and fosfomycin resistance (80.5% and 50.8%, resp.) was highly distributed in chicken meat in Vietnam, as compared to percentages reported in poultry from Austria (12.3%, ciprofloxacin) [30] and Japan (9.3% and 0%, resp.) [18]. In 2004, 52.6%–63.2% of non-ESBL-producingE. coli isolates from Vietnamese chicken meat were reported to be resistant to fluoroquinolones [21]. It is likely that these fluoroquinolones-resistantE. coli isolates subsequently acquired ESBL/pAmpC resistance genes in the chicken intestine within the past 9 years.In the last decade, the incidence of ESBL-producingE. coli with multidrug-resistance has significantly increased in food animals in China [23, 24]. In particular, high percentages of resistance to ciprofloxacin, ranging from 79.6% to 88.1% [24, 31], and fosfomycin (30.9%) [23] were reported. Although fluoroquinolones have been widely used in animal farms, fosfomycin has not been approved for use in China or Vietnam. Thus, it remains unclear why fosfomycin resistance percentages among ESBL-producingE. coli isolates from animals have remarkably increased in both China and Vietnam. One possible reason for this increase is the coselection with other antibiotic agents, such as cephalosporins, because recent studies have shown that one of the fosfomycin resistance genes,fosA3, is colocalized with the b
l
a
CTX-M gene on the same specific plasmid [32–34].


## 5. Conclusion

This study showed a high prevalence of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli isolates among chicken, pork, beef, and fish/shrimp samples collected within the food distribution system of HCMC. These findings demonstrate that animal-based food products in HCMC represent a major reservoir of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli.Our data also suggested that food sanitation practices in slaughterhouses and supermarkets have played a major role in the dissemination and growth of ESBL/pAmpC-producingE. coli in food. Thus, efforts should be made to control the use of antibiotics for food animals, introduce food sanitation management systems, and monitor for the development and dissemination of multidrug-resistant strains in food in Vietnam.



---

*Source: 8182096-2016-02-17.xml*