# Conservation Status of the Family Orchidaceae in Spain Based on European, National, and Regional Catalogues of Protected Species

Authors: Daniel de la Torre Llorente
Journal: The Scientific World Journal
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

This report reviews the European, National, and Regional catalogues of protected species, focusing specifically on the Orchidaceae family to determine which species seem to be well-protected and where they are protected. Moreover, this examination highlights which species appear to be underprotected and therefore need to be included in some catalogues of protection or be catalogued under some category of protection. The national and regional catalogues that should be implemented are shown, as well as what species should be included within them. This report should be a helpful guideline for environmental policies about orchid’s conservation in Spain, at least at the regional and national level. Around 76% of the Spanish orchid flora are listed with any figure of protection or included in any red list, either nationally (about 12–17%) or regionally (72%).


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The family Orchidaceae is widely represented in Europe, with 35 known genera, of which 25 are present in the Iberian Peninsula—26 including the Canary Islands—where the representation of this family is one of the most extensive ones, at least on an extratropical, equivalent level or only slightly lower than in other countries of the Mediterranean region. Taxonomic and floristic studies of this family in the Iberian Peninsula have been increasing slowly, though in a fragmented way over time. The first published quotes regarding the Orchidaceae family date back to 1861 [1, 2], and the first in-depth study of the family was conducted in 1887 [3]. Later, in 1930, a doctoral thesis examining the species in Spanish territory was published [4], but it was not until 1973 that a compendium comprising more or less all knowledge of Spanish orchids to date was published [5]. Since the 1960s, numerous French, Belgian, German, and English orchidologists have visited Spain and have extensively contributed, with the description of new taxa, to taxonomic and corological knowledge of this family. In addition, since 1970, herborization by numerous Spanish botanists has generated many studies, resulting in the development of abundant local, provincial, and regional catalogues of the Iberian territory, which contain new information concerning representatives of the Orchidaceae family, such as Granada [6, 7], Navarre [8], Portugal [9, 10], Albacete [11], Andalusia [12, 13], Balearic Islands [14, 15], Cuenca [16, 17], Extremadura [18, 19], Jaén [20], Burgos [21–23], Catalonia [24–26], Alicante [27, 28], Málaga [29], Almería [30], Galicia [31, 32], La Rioja [33], the Basque Country [34], Murcia [35], and Aragón [36]. The most updated and complete corological work that collects information on the distribution of Orchidaceae in the autonomous community of Madrid dates to 1994 [37]. Later works have helped to supplement such information [38].Additional evidence of incipient interest in the Orchidaceae family is the publication of several European and Mediterranean orchid guidelines [39–46]. All this research work has generated an intense proliferation of names given to members of the Orchidaceae family in Spanish territories. However, recent works are helping to simplify the nomenclature complexity of existing synonymy for this family. These works include the entire family, certain subfamilies, tribes or subtribes [47–60], or more specific works at the level of certain genera likeSerapias[61],Dactylorhiza[62, 63],NigritellaandGymnadenia [64–66],Anacamptis, Orchis,andNeotinea[67–69],LimnorchisandPlatanthera [70],ChamorchisandTraunsteinera [71], orOphrys [72, 73].The study of the taxa in this family, specifically its conservation and stability in landscapes, is essential for the stability of the vegetation and landscape [19]. Much of the representatives of the family Orchidaceae appear in areas with minimal processing and a certain environmental stability, although there may be human presence. This situation has facilitated the use of orchids as bioindicators in the environmental management of the territory in dehesas [74] and deciduous forests [75] and in the conservation of habitats.


## 2. Material and Methods

The nomenclature suggested by Flora iberica has been followed in this work for the family Orchidaceae [76].The following catalogues and regulations have been checked.At theEuropean level, the following have been consulted:(i)
Habitats Directive [77](ii)
Berne Convention [78].At thenational level, the following have been consulted:(i)
National Catalogue of Threatened Species (CNEA) [79] and successive modifications and updates that affect the Orchidaceae family [80–82](ii)
Law on Natural Heritage and Biodiversity [83](iii)
Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora[84] and successive modifications and updates:(iv)
2008 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [85](v)
2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora, updated with the data of the Addendum 2010 to the Atlas and Red Book of the Vascular Threatened Flora [86](vi)
Atlas and Red Book of the Vascular Threatened Flora [86–89].At theregional level, the following have been consulted:(i)
Plan of Recovery of Cypripedium calceolusL. in Aragón[90]—the only regional plan for recovery of orchids in Spain(ii)
Plans for recovery and conservation of certain wild species and habitats protected in Andalusia [91](iii)
Red List of the Vascular Flora of Andalusia [92](iv)
Red List of the Vascular Flora of CAPV (Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco), thereafter Red List of the Basque Country [93].Likewise, this study examined the seventeen corresponding regional catalogues (RC) of each of the seventeen autonomous Spanish communities:(1)
Andalusia [94, 95](2)
Aragón [96–98](3)
Asturias [99](4)
Balearic Islands [100](5)
Basque Country [101–103](6)
Canary Islands [104, 105](7)
Cantabria [106](8)
Castilla-La Mancha [107, 108](9)
Castilla y León [109](10)
Catalonia [110](11)
Comunidad Valenciana [111](12)
Extremadura [112](13)
Galicia [113](14)
La Rioja [114](15)
Madrid [115](16)
Murcia [116](17)
Navarre [117].The data obtained from the aforementioned catalogues were analysed, and the results of this analysis are presented in the Results of this report.The taxa included in the CNEA were those species, subspecies, or populations of wild flora that require specific measures of protection. The category in which those taxa must be included is determined by considering threat factors facing the taxa throughout its natural distribution area inside the national territory, notwithstanding any potential mitigating or aggravating local circumstances of that threat [79]. As a rule, a species, subspecies, or populations of wild flora that require specific or special measures of protection and conservation must be included in regional catalogues. Besides, some regions include more specific criteria for their catalogues. For example, the RC of the Balearic Islands includes those taxa that require conservation measures because of their special interest or because the taxa are not included in the CNEA [100]; the RC of the Canary Islands includes those taxa that require specific measures of protection or that are interesting for Canarian ecosystems [105]; the RC of Extremadura, the RC of Galicia, and the RC of La Rioja include those taxa that require specific measures of protection attending to their rarity, singularity, representativeness, or exceptional nature [112–114]. The RC of Catalonia includes those taxa that are threatened in Catalonia and that require conservation measures according to their ecological and environmental values [110]. The RC of Castilla-La Mancha includes those taxa that are native to Castilla-La Mancha and maintain stable populations in the region, are subjected to threat factors, or are of special interest, thus requiring specific measures of protection [107]. The RC of Andalusia includes those taxa that deserve special attention and protection due to their scientific, ecological, or cultural value or due to their singularity, rarity, or degree of threat; it includes as well those taxa that are protected in different appendixes of international directives and agreements ratified by Spain [94]; the same criteria are expressed in the Law on Natural Heritage and Biodiversity [83].


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. At the European Level

Cypripedium calceolus L. andSpiranthes aestivalis(Poir.) Rich. are the two only orchid species included in theHabitats Directive whose distribution area includes Spain [77]. No orchid species whose distribution area includes Spain appear in theBerne Convention[78].


### 3.2. At the National Level

Although this report follows the nomenclature suggested by Flora iberica [76], which includes a total of 89 Iberian species belonging to 25 different genera, this study also adds four species of Canarian orchid flora not present in the Iberian orchid flora (adding the genusHabenaria, which is not present in the Iberian Peninsula):Habenaria tridactylites Lindl.,Himantoglossum metlesicsianum(W. P. Teschner) P. Delforge,Orchis canariensis Lindl., andSerapias mascaensis H. & G. Kretschner & Kreutz. There are also three species not listed in Flora iberica as individual species, but as a synonym of species already described above. However, the three species were identified as individual species after the publication of the corresponding volume of Flora iberica in which the family Orchidaceae is described [76]. These three species are as follows:(i)
Dactylorhiza cantabrica H.A. Pedersen: this species was named asDactylorhiza insularisÓ. Sánchez & Herrero [76]; it was described as new species for Lugo in 2006 [118].(ii)
Orchis robusta (Steph.) Gölz  & H. R. Reinhard: this species was described asOrchis laxiflorasubsp.robusta Lam. [52] or asOrchis palustris Jacq. var.robusta T. Steph. [76]. It is now considered endemic of La Albufera de Mallorca (Balearic Islands) as a separate species according to several authors. Bateman and collaborators, in their molecular studies, treated it as a species next toOrchis palustris Jacq., but independent of it; they even proposed a combination ofO. robustawithinAnacamptis robusta (T. Steph.) Bateman [49]. Authors such as Delforge also considerO. robusta a different species of all of them [44]. However, Tyteca and Klein combineO. robusta, A. robusta,andO. palustris in a different genus with the nameHerorchis robusta (T. Stephenson) Tyteca & Klein [60].(iii)
Serapias occidentalisC. Venhuis & P. Venhuis: this species was included withinSerapias vomeracea(Buró. Fil.) Briq. It has been proposed as a new species by hybridization ofSerapias vomeracea subsp.vomeracea(Burm. fil.) Briq.x Serapias cordigera L. at Badajoz (Extremadura) [119].Therefore, this work considers a total of 96 species present in Spain belonging to the Orchidaceae family.Once the National Catalogue of Threatened Species [79] was revised, no orchid species were found; subsequent additions and modifications includedH. metlesicsianum in the Danger of Extinction category (included asB. metlesicsiana) [80] and subsequentlyC. calceolus in the same category [81].In the recent update of the CNEA in 2011 [82], the two species listed first (H. metlesicsianum andC. calceolus) have the same category of protection, and two more species are added in the List of Wild Species in Regime of Special Protection,Orchis provincialis Balb. andS. aestivalis.O. provincialis presents a kind of Mediterranean distribution that restricts its presence mainly to the northern and western areas of the Iberian Peninsula.S. aestivalis is dispersed throughout almost all of the Iberian Peninsula, though more commonly found in the north and west and in specific habitats that are vulnerable to tampering, such as peat bogs, quagmires, reed beds, and wet heaths [76].The Law of Natural Heritage and Biodiversity [83] implements the National Catalogue of Threatened Species [79], which includes two species of orchids,C. calceolus, within Appendix  II (Animal and Plant Species of Community Interest Whose Conservation is Necessary to Designate Special Areas of Conservation), andS. aestivalis, within Appendix  V (Animal and Plant Species of Community Interest Requiring a Strict Protection).The categories of threat to species listed in Table1 are those described by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature [120].Table 1
The sixteen species included in2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (RL) [86] following IUCN threat categories [120]. It is shown if they are included in any regional catalogue (RC) and the threat category within them, as well as if they are included in any other catalogue of protected species.
Threat category in RL
Regional catalogues (RC) and threat category
Other catalogues
Corallorhiza trifida Châtel.
CR(EN)∗
RC of Aragón (Danger of Extinction)RC of Catalonia (Danger of Extinction)
Cypripedium calceolus L.
EN
RC of Aragón (Danger of Extinction)RC of Catalonia (Danger of Extinction)
CNEA (Danger of Extinction)Law Nat. Her. Biodiv. (Danger of Extinction)Habitats DirectiveAragón Recuperation Plan
Dactylorhiza cantabrica H. A. Pedersen
VU
Dactylorhiza insularis (Som.) O. Sánchez & Herrero
LC
RC of Extremadura (Special Interest)
Dactylorhiza sulphurea (Link) Franco
LC
RC of Castilla y León (Preferential Attention)
RL Basque Country (CR)RL Andalusia (DD)
Epipactis phyllanthes G. E. Sm.
VU
RL Basque Country (CR)
Epipogium aphyllum Sw.
CR
RC of Catalonia (Danger of Extinction)
Gymnadenia odoratissima (L.) Rich
DD(VU)∗
RC of Catalonia (Vulnerable)RC of Castilla y León (Preferential Attention)
Himantoglossum metlesicsianum (W. P. Teschner) P. Delforge
EN
RC of Canary Islands (Interest for Canarian Ecosystems)
CNEA (Danger of Extinction)
Nigritella gabasiana Teppner & E. Klein
LC(VU)∗
RC of Catalonia (Vulnerable)RC of Castilla y León (Preferential Attention)
RL Basque Country (CR)
Orchis canariensis Lindl.
VU
Orchis robusta (Steph.) Gölz & H. R. Reinhard
CR
Orchis spitzelii Saut.ex W. D. J. Koch
CR
RC of Catalonia (Danger of Extinction)
Serapias nurrica Corrias
VU
RC of Balearic Islands (Vulnerable)
Serapias occidentalis C. & P. Venhuis
VU
Serapias perez-chiscanoi Acedo
NT(VU)∗
RC of Extremadura (Danger of Extinction)
S
p
e
c
i
e
s
∗ included in 2000 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (VV.AA, 2000) with another threatened category.Threatened Species
CR: Critically Endangered
EN: Endangered
VU: VulnerableNot Threatened Species
NT: Near Threatened
LC: Least Concerned
DD: Data DeficientOut of the 96 species of orchids present in the Iberian Peninsula, Balearic Islands, and Canary Islands, 16 species are included in the Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table1) [86], which were already included in the Red List of the Threatened Spanish Vascular Flora of 2008 [85]; five of these species are catalogued as not threatened species (i.e., NT, LC, or DD categories), which means that around 12–17% (depending on whether those five species are included) of the Spanish orchid flora are listed with some degree of threat nationwide, according to the 2010 Red List. Out of these 16 species, there are only two Canarian species—H. metlesicsianum andO. canariensis. So, if these two Canarian threatened species are omitted, there would be 14 species (or 9 species, if those five species mentioned above are not considered) with some degree of threat out of a total of 92 Iberian species (excluding the four species from the Canary Islands), that is, around 10–15% of the Iberian orchid flora.


#### 3.2.1. Threatened Species: Critically Endangered (CR)

At the national level, there are four species listed as Critically Endangered (CR), according to the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora:Corallorhiza trifida Châtel., Epipogium aphyllum Sw., O. robusta,andOrchis spitzelii Saut. ex. W. D. J. Koch (Table 1) [86].C. trifida. In the 2000 Red List of Threatened Vascular Flora of Spain, this species was listed as Endangered (EN), having gone to be classified as Critically Endangered (CR) in the 2008 Red List of Threatened Vascular Flora of Spain [85]; it went from having five 10×10 Km UTM coordinates in 2000 to only one 10×10 Km UTM in 2008. This species is still included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86]. On the other hand, this species appears in the RC of Aragón (Danger of Extinction) (Table 1), where it currently holds the only recently confirmed population (Ordesa, Huesca, Aragón) [87] and in the RC of Catalonia (Danger of Extinction) (Table 1), where it is probably extinct, since the four populations that correspond to four 10×10 Km UTM coordinates have not been confirmed recently [87]. It should, therefore, be included in the CNEA and an urgent plan to recover such an endangered orchid should be developed.E. aphyllum. This species is included in the 2010 Spanish Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86] and in the RC of Catalonia (Danger of Extinction) (Table 1), where its only population in the Pallars Sobirà of Lleida has not been confirmed recently; on the other hand, this species has two 10×10 Km UTM more, one in Sierra Cebollera (La Rioja) and the other one between Huesca and Navarre, in the Valley of Linza (Huesca, Aragón) and the Belagua Valley (Navarre) [87]; therefore, it is suggested that this species should be included in the RC of Aragón, RC of Navarra, and RC of La Rioja, where it is currently not included, most likely because these catalogues are relatively old, dating back to 1995, 1997, and 1998, respectively. Of course, this species should be included in the CNEA as well.O. robusta. Although its description dates from 1976 [121], this species has been recently discontinued as a subspecies [44, 49], meaning that it is included only in the 2008 and 2010 Red Lists of Spanish Vascular Flora [85, 86]. It is endemic to the Balearic Islands and is found only in the Albufera of Mallorca (Balearic Islands). Therefore,O. robusta should be included in the CNEA as well as in the RC of Baleares.O. spitzelli. Although this species is relatively widely distributed, with twenty-one 10×10 Km UTM coordinates, it currently only has a single 10×10 Km UTM recently confirmed in the Sierra del Cadí (Lleida, Catalonia). For this reason, this species is listed as Critically Endangered (CR) [85, 86] and it is only listed in the RC of Catalonia (Danger of Extinction) (Table 1), while it does not appear in the CNEA. Therefore, it is strongly suggested that this species be included in the CNEA.These four species of orchids listed as Critically Endangered in Spain (CR) should have specific plans of recovery.


#### 3.2.2. Threatened Species: Endangered (EN)

There are two species classified as Endangered (EN) according to the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86]:C. calceolusandH. metlesicsianum.C. calceolus. This species is most likely, among all species of orchids included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora, the species that is included in the most catalogues of protection, is the most studied, and has the most protection, since the threat to this species in the Iberian Peninsula was detected more than twenty years ago, being, along withS. aestivalis, the only two species protected in Spain that are included in the Habitats Directive [77]. In addition,C. calceolus andH. metlesicsianumare the only two species of Spanish orchids included in the CNEA in the category Danger of Extinction [82] and the only species, along withS. aestivalis, which are included in the Law of Natural Heritage and Biodiversity [83].C. calceolus is also included in the RC of Aragón (Table 1) and the RC of Catalonia (Table 1) and has appeared in the Atlas and Red Book of the Threatened Vascular Flora of Spain since 2004 [87]. This is the only orchid that has a Plan of Recovery in Spain [90]. Since the distribution ofC. calceolus in Spain is restricted to Aragón and Catalonia, it does not seem necessary to include this species in any other catalogue, neither regional nor national.H. metlesicsianum. This is one of the two Canarian species—along withO. canariensis (VU)—which are included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86].H. metlesicsianum, whose distribution is restricted to Tenerife island (Canary Islands), has been included in the Atlas and Red Book of the Threatened Vascular Flora of Spain since 2004 [87] and it is included in the CNEA [80, 82] and the RC of the Canary Islands [104]; therefore, this species does not need to be included in any other protection catalogue.


#### 3.2.3. Vulnerable Species (VU)

The vulnerable orchid species includeD. cantabrica,Epipactis phyllanthesG.E. Sm.,O. canariensis,Serapias nurrica Corrias andS. occidentalis.There are sixteen species included in the Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table1) [86], and four of them are not included in any other national or regional catalogue. Three of these species are the above-mentionedD. cantabrica, O. canariensis andS. occidentalis. The fourth one isO. robusta(CR), which was discussed above.These three species—O. robusta,D. cantabrica, andS. occidentalis—most likely are in the Red List and no other catalogue because they have recently been described as separate species [49, 118, 119];O. canariensis has not been described so recently but shows a relatively restricted distribution (Lanzarote and Fuerteventura; Canary Islands). Undoubtedly, the most troubling case isO. robusta, which is classified as Critically Endangered (CR); the other species, recent description or not, are not urgent in the short term, since they are classified as vulnerable (VU).Nevertheless, and with the exception ofS. nurrica andE. phyllanthes, none of the other three listed species as VU are found in any catalogue of protection; the recommendation would be to include those five species within the CNEA; in addition,D. cantabrica, which has been cited in O’Couto and Caurel (Lugo, Galicia), should be included in the RC of Galicia;E. phyllanthes, cited in Liencres (Santander, Cantabria) and Gorliz (Vizcaya, Basque Country), should be included in the RC of Cantabria and the RC of the Basque Country (although it is already included in the Red List of the Basque Country [93]);O. canariensis, endemic to the Canary Islands (Lanzarote and Fuerteventura) should be included in the RC of the Canary Islands;S. occidentalis, cited in Campo Lugar, Obanco, and Aljucén (Cáceres, Extremadura), should be included in the RC of Extremadura.


#### 3.2.4. Other Categories, Not Threatened Species: Near Threatened (NT), Least Concern (LC), and Data Deficient (DD)

As species catalogued as Near Threatened (NT), nationally, onlySerapias perez-chiscanoi Acedo is included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86] (Table 1); this species, in the 2000 Red List of Threatened Vascular Flora of Spain [84], had been classified as Vulnerable (VU), but the recent discovery of new populations of this species has led to its cataloguing as NT since 2008 [19, 85, 122]. This species is endemic to Portugal and Spain and more specifically to Extremadura (in Spain). This species is included in the RC of Extremadura as a species in Danger of Extinction [112]. Given that this regional catalogue is nine years older than the Spanish Red List, it explains that it seems not to be updated.A second group of species under no threat at the national level but included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86] are classified as Least Concerned (LC); in this group areD. insularis,Dactylorhiza sulphurea (Link) Franco, andNigritella gabasiana Teppner & E. Klein.D. insularis. This species is also included in the RC of Extremadura [112] as a species of Special Concern, since, without being regulated in any of the categories of greatest threat (Endangered, Sensitive to Alteration of Their Habitat, Vulnerable), it is worthy of particular attention on the basis of its scientific, ecological, and cultural value or by its singularity [112].D. sulphurea. This species is included in the RC of Castilla y León [109] as one of Preferential Attention, since, without meeting the conditions to be attached to any of the categories of greatest threat (Endangered, Vulnerable, Sensitive to Alteration of Their Habitat, and Of Special Attention), the species is scarce in Castilla y León, presenting threatened or reduced populations, which could be affected by different disturbances or that are linked to habitats in regression [109]. Additionally, the species is classified as Vulnerable in the RC of the Basque Country (included asDactylorhiza markusii (Tineo) H. Baumann & Künkele) [102]. It has also been recently included in the Red List of the Basque Country as Critically Endangered (CR) [93], which suggests that its status in the RC of the Basque Country as Vulnerable should be changed to Critically Endangered (CR). It was also included in the Red List of the Vascular Flora of Andalusia in the category of Data Deficient (DD) [92].N. gabasiana. At the national level, this species was included as Vulnerable (VU) in the 2000 Red List of Threatened Vascular Flora of Spain [84], listed as Least Concern (LC) in the 2008 Red List of Threatened Vascular Flora of Spain [85], and remains so catalogued [86]. Additionally, it is classified as a Rare species in the RC of the Basque Country [102], and it is also included in the Red List of the Basque Country as Critically Endangered (CR) [93]; this fact does suggest that the status of this species in the RC of Basque Country as Rare should be changed to Critically Endangered (CR). It is also listed as Preferential Attention in the RC of Castilla y León, since, without meeting the conditions to be attached to any of the categories of greatest threat (Endangered, Vulnerable, Sensitive to Alteration of Their Habitat, and Of Special Attention), the species is scarce in Castilla y León, showing threatened or reduced populations and that they could be affected by different disturbances or are linked to habitats in regression [109].Finally,Gymnadenia odoratissima (L.) Rich is classified at the national level as Data Deficient (DD) according to the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86]. At the regional level, this species is listed as Preferential Attention in the RC of Castilla y León, since, without meeting the conditions to be attached to any of the categories of greatest threat (Endangered, Vulnerable, Sensitive to Alteration of Their Habitat, and Of Special Attention), it is scarce in Castilla y León, presenting threatened or reduced populations and that they could be affected by different disturbances or are linked to habitats in regression [109]. This species is catalogued as Vulnerable according to RC of Catalonia [110].


### 3.3. At the Regional Level

At the regional level, from the review of the corresponding seventeen regional catalogues of each autonomous Spanish community and the two existing regional red lists for Andalusia and the Basque Country [92, 93], the following results emerge.Out of the 96 species of orchids existing in Spain, up to a total of 69 are included in any catalogue of regional protection or regional red list (including 12 of 16 protected species nationwide), that is, around 72%. Only four out of the sixteen species included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora are not included in any regional catalogue nor any regional red list (D. cantabrica, O. canariensis, O. robusta, andS. occidentalis) (Table 1) [86]. If both, the species included in the national and regional catalogues are considered, that is, also including these four species, and then 73 species are included in some catalogue of protection, which means that 76% of the Spanish orchid flora are listed with some figure of legal protection.In Tables2–20 are the species of orchids included in each of the regional catalogues and the cataloguing as protected species for each autonomous community, indicating the piece of legislation that regulates it. These tables are as follows.Table 2
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Andalusia (DEC 23/2012).
RC of Andalusia (LAW 8/2003; DEC. 23/2012)
Neottia nidus-avis (L.) Rich
Vulnerable
Ophrys atlantica Munby
Vulnerable
Ophrys speculumLink subsp.lusitanica O. Danesch & E. Danesch
Vulnerable (before as in Danger of Extinction)
Spiranthes spiralis (L.) Chevall.
Wild species in Protection RegimeTable 3
Species included in the Red List of the Vascular Flora of Andalusia [92].
Red List of Andalusia
Dactylorhiza markusii (Tineo) H. Baumann & Künkele = D. sulphurea (Link) Franco
DD
Dactylorhiza sulphurea (Link) Franco∗
DD
Epipactis lusitanica D. Tyteca
DD
Epipactis microphylla (Ehrh.) Sw.
DD
Gennaria diphylla(Link) Parl.
VU
Gymnadenia conopsea (L.) R. Br. in W.T. Aiton
VU
Listera ovata (L.) R. Br. in W.T. Aiton
DD
Neottia nidus-avis (L.) Rich∗∗
EN
Ophrys atlantica
M
u
n
b
y
∗
∗
DD
Ophrys speculumLink subsp.lusitanica O. Danesch &  E.Danesch∗∗
DD
Orchis palustris Jacq.
DD
Platanthera algeriensis Batt. & Trab.
DD
Spiranthes spiralis (L.) Chevall.∗∗
DD
S
p
e
c
i
e
s
∗ included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86]. Species∗∗ included in the RC of Andalusia.Table 4
Species included in the regional catalogue (R.C.) of Aragón (DEC. 49/1995; ORD. 2004/03/04).
RC of Aragón (DEC. 49/1995; ORD. 4/03/2004; DEC. 181/2005)
Corallorhiza trifida
C
h
â
t
e
l
.
∗
In Danger of Extinction
Cypripedium calceolus
L
.
∗
In Danger of Extinction
Ophrys riojanaC. E. Hermos. = O. sphegodes Mill.
Sensitive to Habitat Alteration
Orchis simia Lam.
Vulnerable
S
p
e
c
i
e
s
∗ included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86].Table 5
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Asturias (DEC. 65/1995).
RC of Asturias (DEC. 65/1995)
NoneTable 6
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Balearic Islands (DEC. 65/1995).
RC of Balearic Islands (DEC. 75/2005)
Cephalanthera rubra (L.) Rich.
Vulnerable
Gymnadenia conopsea (L.) R. Br. in W.T. Aiton
Vulnerable
Neottia nidus-avis(L.) Rich.
Vulnerable
Orchis cazorlensis Lacaita
Vulnerable
Orchis palustris Jacq.
Vulnerable
Serapias nurrica
C
o
r
r
i
a
s
∗
Vulnerable
S
p
e
c
i
e
s
∗ included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86].Table 7
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Basque Country (ORD. 3471/1998).
RC of Basque Country (ORD. 3471/1998)
Coeloglossum viride (L.) Hartm.
Rare
Dactylorhiza markusii(Tineo) H. Baumann & Künkele= D. sulphurea(Link) Franco∗
Vulnerable
Epipactis palustris (L.) Crantz
Rare
Himantoglossum hircinum (L.) Spreng.
Special Interest
Nigritella gabasianaTeppner &E.Klein∗
Rare
Orchis italicaPoir. in Lam.
Vulnerable
Spiranthes aestivalis(Poir.) Rich
Rare
S
p
e
c
i
e
s
∗ included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86].Table 8
Species included in the Red List of Basque Country [93].
Red List of Basque Country
Barlia robertiana(R. J. Loisel) Greuter∗∗
CR
Coeloglossum viride(L.) Hartm.
VU
Dactylorhiza sulphurea(Link) Franco∗
CR
Epipactis palustris (L.) Crantz
VU
Epipactis phyllanthesG. E. Sm.∗∗∗
CR
Himantoglossum hircinum (L.) Spreng
NT
Nigritella gabasianaTeppner &  E.Klein∗
CR
Ophrys aveyronensis(J. J. Wood) P. Delforge in P. Delforge &  D.Tyteca∗∗
VU
Orchis cazorlensis
L
a
c
a
i
t
a
∗
∗
CR
Orchis italicaPoir. in Lam.
VU
Orchis papilionacea
L
.
∗
∗
DD
Spiranthes aestivalis(Poir.) Rich
VU
S
p
e
c
i
e
s
∗ included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86]. Species∗∗ not included in the RC of Basque Country.Table 9
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Canary Islands (DEC. 151/2001; LAW 4/2010).
RC of Canary Islands (DEC. 151/2001; LAW 4/2010)
Himantoglossum metlesicsianum(W. P. Tesch.) P.Delforge∗
Interest for Canary Ecosystems (before as in Danger of Extinction)
S
p
e
c
i
e
s
∗ included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86].Table 10
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Cantabria (DEC. 120/2008).
RC of Cantabria (DEC. 120/2008)
Epipactis palustris (L.) Krantz
In Danger of ExtinctionTable 11
Species included in the regional catalogue (R.C.) of Castilla-La Mancha (DEC. 33/1998; DEC. 200/2001).
R.C of Castilla-La Mancha (DEC. 33/1998; DEC. 200/2001)
Aceras anthropophorum(L.) W. T. Aiton
Special Interest
Coeloglossum viride(L.) Hartm.
Special Interest
Dactylorhiza incarnata(L.) Soó
Vulnerable
Dactylorhiza sambucina(L.) Soó
Vulnerable
Dactylorhizaspp.
Special Interest
Epipactis distansArv.-Touv.
Special Interest
Epipactis palustris(L.) Crantz
Special Interest
Gymnadenia conopsea(L.) R. Br. in W. T. Aiton
Special Interest
Himantoglossum hircinum (L.) Spreng.
Special Interest
Listera ovata (L.) R. Br. in W. T. Aiton
Special Interest
Neottia nidus-avis(L.) Rich
Special Interest
Ophrys insectifera L.
Vulnerable
Platantheraspp.
Special Interest
Serapias cordigera L.
Special InterestTable 12
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Castilla y León (DEC. 63/2007).
RC of Castilla y León (DEC. 63/2007)
Barlia robertiana (R.J.Loisel) Greuter
Preferential Attention
Dactylorhiza sulphurea (Link) Franco∗
Preferential Attention
Epipactis fageticola(C.E. Hermos.) Devillers-Tersch. & Devillers
Preferential Attention
Epipactis microphylla(Ehrh..) Sw.
Preferential Attention
Epipactis palustris(L.) Crantz
Preferential Attention
Epipactis tremolsiiPau
Preferential Attention
Gymnadenia odoratissima(L.) Rich∗
Preferential Attention
Nigritella gabasianaTeppner &  E.Klein∗
Preferential Attention
Ophrys insectifera L.
Preferential Attention
Orchis cazorlensis Lacaita
Preferential Attention
Orchis conica Willd.
Preferential Attention
Orchis pallens L.
Preferential Attention
Orchis papilionacea L.
Preferential Attention
Orchis provincialis Balb. ex. Lam. & D.C
Preferential Attention
Platanthera algeriensisBatt. & Trab.
Vulnerable
Platanthera chlorantha (Custer) Rchb. in Mössler
Preferential Attention
Pseudorchis albida (L.) Á. Löve & D. Löve
Preferential Attention
Spiranthes aestivalis (Poir.) Rich
Preferential Attention
S
p
e
c
i
e
s
∗ included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86].Table 13
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Catalonia (DEC. 172/2008).
RC of Catalonia (DEC. 172/2008)
Coeloglossum viride(L.) Hartm.
Strictly Protected
Corallorhiza trifida Châtel.∗
In Danger of Extinction
Cypripedium calceolus
L
.
∗
In Danger of Extinction
Epipogium aphyllum
S
w
.
∗
In Danger of Extinction
Gymnadenia odoratissima(L.) Rich∗
Vulnerable
Ophrys catalaunica(O. Danesch & E. Danesch.) Soca= O.bertoloniiMoretti subsp. catalaunica(O. Danesch & E. Danesch.) Soca
Strictly Protected
Orchis palustrisJacq.
Vulnerable
Orchis spitzeliiSaut. ex W. D. J. Koch∗
In Danger of Extinction
Spiranthes aestivalis (Poir.) Rich
Vulnerable
S
p
e
c
i
e
s
∗ included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86].Table 14
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Comunidad Valenciana (DEC. 70/2009).
RC of Comunidad Valenciana (DEC. 70/2009)
Aceras anthropophorum(L.) W. T. Aiton
Watched species
Barlia robertiana (R. J. Loisel) Greuter
Protected species not catalogued
Cephalanthera damasonium(Mill.) Druce
Watched species
Coeloglossum viride (L.) Hartm.
Vulnerable
Dactylorhiza fuchsii (Druce) Soó
Watched species
Dactylorhiza incarnata (L.) Soó
Vulnerable
Dactylorhiza insularis (Som.) O. Sánchez &  Herrero∗
Vulnerable
Dactylorhiza maculata (L.) Soó
Protected species not catalogued
Dactylorhiza sambucina(L.) Soó
Watched species
Epipactis atrorubensHoffm. ex Besser
Watched species
Epipactis distans
Watched species
Epipactis fageticola
Vulnerable
Epipactis palustris (L.) Crantz
Protected species not catalogued
Epipactis rhodanensis Gévaudar & Robatsch
Watched species
Epipactis tremolsiiPau
Watched species
Goodyera repens (L.) R. Br. in W. T. Aiton
Watched species
Gymnadenia conopsea (L.) R. Br. in W. T. Aiton
Watched species
Limodorum trabutianum Batt.
Watched species
Listera ovata(L.) R. Br. in W. T. Aiton
Protected species not catalogued
Neottia nidus-avis (L.) Rich
Protected species not catalogued
Ophrys castellanaDevillers-Tesch. & Devillers= O. sphegodesMill.
Protected species not catalogued
Ophrys incubaceaBianca= O. sphegodesMill.
Protected species not catalogued
Ophrys sphegodes Mill.
Watched species
Orchis cazorlensisLacaita
Protected species not catalogued
Orchis collinaBanks & Sol. ex. Russell
Vulnerable
Orchis conica Willd.
Vulnerable
Orchis coriophoraL. subsp. martrinii (Timb.-Lagr.) Nyman
Watched species
Orchis fragrans (Pollini) K. Richt.= O. coriophoraL. subsp. fragrans(Pollini) K. Richt.
Protected species not catalogued
Orchis italicaPoir. in Lam.
Watched species
Orchis langei K. Richt.
Watched species
Orchis papilionaceaL.
In Danger of Extinction
Orchis picta (Loisl.) K. Richt. = O. morio L. subsp. picta (Loisl.) K. Richt.
Watched species
Orchis purpurea Huds.
Vulnerable
Orchis ustulata L.
Protected species not catalogued
Platanthera bifolia (L.) Rich
Protected species not catalogued
Platanthera chlorantha (Custer) Rchb. in Mössler
Protected species not catalogued
Serapias lingua L.
Vulnerable
Serapias parviflora Parl.
Protected species not catalogued
Serapias strictiflora Welw. ex Veiga
Vulnerable
Spiranthes aestivalis(Poir.) Rich
In Danger of Extinction
Spiranthes spiralis (L.) Chevall.
Watched species
S
p
e
c
i
e
s
∗ included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86].Table 15
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Extremadura (DEC. 37/2001).
RC of Extremadura (DEC. 37/2001)
Cephalanthera rubra(L.) Rich
Special Interest
Dactylorhiza insularis(Som.) O. Sánchez &  Herrero∗
Special Interest
Limodorum trabutianumBatt.
Vulnerable
Neottia nidus-avis(L.) Rich
Vulnerable
Ophrys dyris(Maire) Soó in G. Keller Schltr. & Soó = O. fuscaLinksubsp. dyris(Maire) Soó in G. Keller Schltr. & Soó
Special Interest
Orchis italicaPoir. in Lam.
Special Interest
Orchis langeiK. Richt.
Special Interest
Orchis papilionáceaL.
Special Interest
Serapias perez-chiscanoi
A
c
e
d
o
∗
In Danger of Extinction
Spiranthes aestivalis(Poir.) Rich
Special Interest
S
p
e
c
i
e
s
∗ included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86].Table 16
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Galicia (DEC. 88/2007).
RC of Galicia (DEC. 88/2007)
Spiranthes aestivalis (Poir.) Rich
VulnerableTable 17
Species included in the regional catalogue (R.C.) of La Rioja (DEC. 59/1998).
R.C. of La Rioja (DEC. 59/1998)
NoneTable 18
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Madrid (DEC. 18/1992).
RC of Madrid (DEC. 18/1992)
Platanthera bifolia (L.) Rich
Vulnerable
Neottia nidus-avis(L.) Rich
VulnerableTable 19
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Murcia (DEC. 50/2003).
RC of Murcia (DEC. 50/2003)
Aceras anthropophorum(L.) W.T. Aiton
Vulnerable
Barlia robertiana(R.J.Loisel) Greuter
Vulnerable
Cephalanthera rubra(L.) Rich
Vulnerable
Dactylorhiza elata (Poir.) Soó
Vulnerable
Epipactis cardinaBenito & C.E. Hermos.
Special Interest
Himantoglossum hircinum (L.) Spreng.
Vulnerable
Listera ovata(L.) R. Br. in W.T. Aiton
Vulnerable
Ophrys incubacea Bianca = O. sphegodes Mill.
Special Interest
Orchis cazorlensisLacaita
Vulnerable
Orchis purpurea Huds.
Vulnerable
Serapias lingua L.
Vulnerable
Serapias parviflora Parl.
VulnerableTable 20
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Navarre (DEC. 94 /1997).
RC of Navarre (DEC. Foral 94/1997)
Orchis papilionaceaL.
Sensitive to Habitat AlterationTable2 specifies the species included in the regional catalogue that lists endangered species of Andalusia [94, 95]; Table 3 specifies those species that are included in the Red List of the Vascular Flora of Andalusia [92]; Table 4 is for Aragón [96, 98]; Table 5 is for Asturias [99]; Table 6 is for the Balearic Islands [100]; Table 7 is for the Basque Country [101–103]; Table 8 specifies those species that are included in the Red List of the Vascular Flora of the Basque Country [93]; Table 9 is for Canary Islands [104, 105]; Table 10 is for Cantabria [106]; Table 11 is for Castilla-La Mancha [107, 108]; Table 12 is for Castilla y León [109]; Table 13 is for Catalonia [110]; Table 14 is for Comunidad Valenciana [111]; Table 15 is for Extremadura [112]; Table 16 is for Galicia [113]; Table 17 is for La Rioja [114]; Table 18 is for Madrid [115]; Table 19 is for Murcia [116]; Table 20 is for Navarre [117].The Red List of Andalusia (Table3; [94, 95]) is not an official list with legislation but should serve as a basis for whether to include certain species in the RC of Andalusia (Table 2). Andalusia’s RC has one notable absence,D. sulphurea. In addition,Gennaria diphylla (Link) Parl. andGymnadenia conopsea (L.) R. Br. in W. T. Aiton, both listed as VU in the Red List of Andalusia, should be included as well in the RC of Andalusia [92].The RC of Aragón [96], its update being relatively recent [97, 98] (Table 4), seems to collect the most endangered species in this region, some of them clearly nationally threatened, such asC. trifida andC. calceolus (Table 1) [86]; however, it would be convenient to includeE. aphyllum, a species included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora as a Critically Endangered species (CR) (Table 1) [86].In the case of Asturias [99] (Table 5), despite its great biodiversity of flora, including orchids, the RC of Asturias does not include any species of the Orchidaceae family.In the RC of the Balearic Islands [100] (Table 6), the presence ofS. nurricais notable, as it is also included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (VU) (Table 1) [86]. The inclusion ofO. robusta in the regional catalogue should be pressing, as it is already included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora as Critically Endangered (CR) (Table 1) [86].The Red List of the Basque Country [93] (Table 8) includes the seven species of the RC of the Basque Country, generally with degrees of threat greater than those designated in the RC of the Basque Country: bothD. sulphurea andN. gabasiana are listed as CR, and the other species listed as Rare in the RC of the Basque Country(C. viride, E. palustris,andS. spiralis) are catalogued in the Red List of the Basque Country as VU, as well asOrchis italic Por in Lam., which is still listed as VU. The seventh species,Himantoglossum hircinum (L.) Spreng.,is catalogued as Special Interest in the RC of the Basque Country whereas in the Red List of the Basque Country it is catalogued as Near Threatened. The Red List of the Basque Country adds to these seven species five more:E. phyllanthes, which is listed as CR in the Basque Country and as VU at the national level according to the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86];Barlia robertiana (R. J. Loisel) Greuter andOrchis cazorlensis Lacaita, both listed as CR;Ophrys aveyronensis (J. J. Wood) P. Delforge in P. Delforge & D. Tyteca as VU; andOrchis papilionacea L., which is classified as DD [93]. It would be advisable, therefore, to include at leastE. phyllantheswithin the RC of the Basque Country, a species cited in this community only at Gorliz (Bilbao). It would also be advisable to include the other four species, especially the two species listed as CR (B. robertiana andO. cazorlensis) and to a lesser extentO. aveyronensis (VU) andO. papilionacea (DD).The RC of the Canary Islands [104, 105] (Table 9), which includesH. metlesicsianum (included asB. metlesicsiana. in the category Extinction Danger) [104], should be expanded withO. canariensis, included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora as Vulnerable (VU) (Table 1) [86].The RC of Cantabria [106] (Table 10) includes only one species,Epipactis palustris (L.) Crantz; however, it seems clear thatE. phyllanthes should be included as well, as it is included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora as a vulnerable species (VU) (Table 1) [86], cited only at Liencres (Santander, Cantabria).Table11 shows the species included in the regional catalogue of endangered species of Castilla-La Mancha [107, 108].Table12 shows the species included in the regional catalogue of endangered species in Castilla y León [109]. It is an extensive list, with eighteen species, three of which are included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora:G. odoratissima (DD),D. sulphurea(LC), andN. gabasiana (LC) (Table 1) [86]; however,O. spitzelii is not included and perhaps it should be due to the few populations of this species in this region [22]; this species is included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora as Critically Endangered (CR) (Table 1) [86].Table13 specifies those species included in the regional catalogue of endangered species in Catalonia [110]. Although it is not a very extensive listing, as it includes only a total of nine species, it is the regional catalogue that includes a greater number of species that are included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86], with five species, most of them as Critically Endangered (CR:C. trifida,E. aphyllum, andO. spitzelii) or Endangered (EN:C. calceolus) at the national level, all of them catalogued as in Danger of Extinction according to the RC of Catalonia; onlyG. odoratissima (DD) is not threatened according to the Spanish Red List, classified as Vulnerable according to the RC of Catalonia. Therefore, and considering that it is one of the most recent catalogues, the regional catalogue of Catalonia seems to be very up to date. It should be noted that it is the only regional catalogue to includeO. spitzelii, an endangered species according to the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86], which is also exceptionally present in other autonomous communities such as Castilla y León or Aragón (not confirmed in Aragón).Table14 specifies the species included in the regional catalogue of endangered species of Comunidad Valenciana [111]. This is one of the most recent regional catalogues of endangered species of Spain; evidence of this recentness is its thoroughness, with a total of 41 species included (39 if synonyms are taken into account), although onlyD. insularis is included nationally in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (LC) (Table 1) [86]. This catalogue appears to be updated as it is one of the most recent regional catalogues, and it lists a large number of species.The Regional Catalogue of Extremadura [112] (Table 15) contains two of the species included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86]—D. insularis andS. perez-chiscanoi; in the case of the latter, catalogued for Extremadura as Endangered and however listed nationally as Near Threatened (NT) according to the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86], it seems clear that its status should change regionally to a degree of minor threat. It would be useful to include in this catalogueS. occidentalis,a species highly located in Extremadura, specifically at Campo Lugar, Obanco, and Aljucén (Cáceres). It should be listed as VU according to the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86].In the case of the Regional Catalogue of Galicia [113] (Table 16), with only one species,S. aestivalis (Vu), it should at least includeD. cantabrica, catalogued nationally as VU according to the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86] and cited only at O’Couto (Caurel, Lugo).The Regional Catalogue of La Rioja [113] (Table 17) does not collect any species of the Orchidaceae family; it is recommended to include, at least,E. aphyllum, with one population in Sierra Cebollera and listed nationally as Critically Endangered (CR) according to the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86].The Regional catalogue of the Comunidad de Madrid is the most ancient of the many catalogues in Spain [115] (Table 18), including only two species—Platanthera bifolia (L.) Rich andNeottia nidus-avis (L.) Rich. The list of possible species to be included is long, with very specific or apparently extinct species in this autonomous community, as evidenced by recent studies [38]. These species includeAceras anthropophorum(L.) W. T. Aiton, Anacamptis pyramidalis(L.) Rich, Barlia robertiana(R. J. Loisel) Greuter, Cephalanthera rubra(L.) Rich,D. insularis,Dactylorhiza sambucina (L.) Soó, G. conopsea, H. hircinum, Limodorum trabutianum Batt., Listera ovata(L.) R. Br. in W.T. Aiton, Neotinea maculata (Desf.) Stearn., Ophrys fuscaLink, Orchis papilionaceaL., Serapias cordigera L. andSpiranthjes spiralis (L.) Chevall.Murcia’s RC [116] (Table 19) seems to be up to date, since it is quite recent, dating from the year 2003, and it includes twelve species.Opposite to Murcia’s RC in terms of timeliness is that of Navarre’s RC [117] (Table 20), which includes only one species,Orchis papilionacea. This catalogue should be reviewed, and it should include at leastE. aphyllum, with one population at the Belagua Valley and that appears in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora as a species in critical Danger of Extinction (CR) (Table 1) [86].


### 3.4. Statistical Analysis

After conducting a joint analysis of the different regional catalogues, the following observations can be made.Table21 refers to the main genera that have been included in regional catalogues of protected species the most, indicating the number of times that each genus has been included in a regional catalogue and the number of species of this genus that have been included in a regional catalogue. The table also specifies the number of species for each genus at the national level following Flora iberica [76].Table 21
Number of species by genus in Spain [76], number of times that they are included in regional catalogues (RC) by genus, and number of species included in regional catalogues (RC) by genus.
Number of spp./genus
Number of times in RC/genus
Number of spp. included in RC/genus
Orchis
21
28
16
Epipactis
14
15
8
Ophrys
12
11
9
Dactylorhiza
9
10
8
Serapias
8
8
6
Spiranthes
2
9
2
Neottia
1
6
1Figure1 represents the genera whose species mostly have been included in the set of 17 regional catalogues. The genera that include large numbers of species and are therefore most likely to be present in many autonomous communities are also those that are included in a larger number of regional catalogues, stressing above all the genusOrchis, with 28 inclusions of different species in the regional catalogues, which precisely shows the greater number of species at the national level (21 species) (Table 21; Figure 1) [76]. In fact, if a correlation is made between the number of species that those genera have at the national level and the number of times that those genera have been included in any regional catalogue (represented by any kind of species that belong to that genus), the correlation is quite high (R2=0.79) (Figure 2).Figure 1
Genera mostly represented in regional catalogues (RC).Figure 2
Relationship of regression between the number of species per genus and the number of regional catalogues (RC) in which each genus is included.At the opposite end, there are the generaNeottia, single grazing (Neottia nidus-avis (L.) Rich), andSpiranthes, with two species (S. aestivalis andS. spiralis), which are included in six and nine regional catalogues, respectively.In a complementary manner, in Figure3 there are the genera with a larger number of species included in the regional catalogues, showing similar results to those in Figure 1 but excludingNeottia andSpiranthes, as they are only represented by one and two species, respectively.Figure 3
Genera with the highest number of species included in the regional catalogues. At the same time, the numbers of species included in regional catalogues and regional red lists are included.For Figure3, the results are more homogenous, and, except forOrchis, which remains standing with 16 species included in various regional catalogues, the other genera are represented through six to nine species in the different regional catalogues. This drop in the number of species is because several species are repeated in several catalogues, but there are really not so many different species, especially in the case ofOrchis andEpipactis, featuring 28 and 15 appointments in different regional catalogues (Figure 1) corresponding to 16 and 8 species, respectively (Figure 3, Table 21). The correlation between the number of species per genus and the number of species that are included in regional catalogue per genus continues to present a high determination coefficient (R2=0.88; figure not shown). Likewise, if the number of times that a genus is included in any regional catalogue is correlated with the number of species of that genus included in regional catalogues, the correlation is quite high (R2=0.92; figure not shown), as expected.Similarly, Figure4 represents the species that are included in the greatest number of regional catalogues, highlightingS. aestivalis andN. nidus-avis, found in seven and six regional catalogues, respectively. None of the six most cited species in regional catalogues (four to seven cites) are included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86], which is indicative of their wide national distribution, although in certain autonomous communities they are scarce; however,S. aestivalis is included in the CNEA [82].Figure 4
Species mostly included in regional catalogues (RC).Table22 constitutes a compendium of the results after analysing the global set of 17 regional catalogues. The table indicates, for each one of these regions, the law by which its regional catalogue was created or its most recent modification (and therefore the year), the number of listed species, and if, based on the results mentioned above, an urgent modification is considered; it also includes the species most urgent to include in each catalogue and its conservation status if it exists, according to the Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86] (Table 1).Table 22
Number of species included in each regional catalogue, indicating in each case the most recent legislation that regulates it, as well as the need of an urgent modification, the minimum species to include in it, and their figure of protection—if it exists—according to the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86] (Table 1).
Regional catalogue
Number of spp.
Needs modification?
Species to include
Andalusia (DEC. 23/2012)
4
YES
Dactylorhiza sulphurea(Link) Franco (LC)Gennaria diphylla(Link) Parl.Gymnadenia conopsea(L.) R. Br. in W.T. Aiton
Aragón (DEC. 185/2005)
4
YES
Epipogium aphyllumSw. (CR)
Asturias (DEC. 65/1995)
0
YES
Undetermined
Balearic Islands (DEC. 75/2005)
6
YES
Orchis robusta(Steph.) Gölz & H.R. Reinhard (CR)
Basque Country (ORD. 3471/1998; ORD. 3901/2003)
7
YES
Barlia robertiana (Lois.) Greuter (CR)Epipactis phyllanthes G.E. Sm. (VU)Orchis cazorlensis LacaitaOrchis papilionaceaL. Ophrys aveyronensis (J.J. Wood) P. Delforge in P. Delforge & D. Tyteca
Canary Islands (LEY 4/2010)
1
YES
Orchis canariensis (VU)
Cantabria (DEC. 120/2008)
1
YES
Epipactis phyllanthes G.E. Sm. (VU)
Castilla-La Mancha
NO
—
(DEC. 33/1998; DEC. 200/2001)
Castilla y León (DEC. 63/2007)
18
YES
Orchis spitzelii Saut ex.W.D.J.Koch (CR)
Catalonia(DEC. 172/2008)
9
NO
—
Com. Valenciana (DEC. 70/2009)
41
NO
—
Extremadura (DEC. 37/2001)
10
YES
Serapias occidentalis C. & P. Venhuis (VU) Serapias perez-chiscanoi Acedo (NT)
Galicia (DEC. 88/2007)
1
YES
Dactylorhiza cantabrica H.A.Peders. (VU)
La Rioja (DEC. 59/1998)
0
YES
Epipogium aphyllum Sw. (CR)
Madrid (DEC. 18/1992)
2
YES
Undetermined
Murcia (DEC. 50/2003)
12
NO
—
Navarre (DEC. F. 94/1997)
1
YES
Epipogium aphyllumSw. (CR)As evident in Table22, there is no clear relationship between how recent each regional catalogue is and the number of protected species included in it (R2=0.1; figure not shown); nevertheless, it is quite obvious for some regional catalogues that seem obsolete, as in the cases of Madrid [115], Asturias [99], Navarre [117], La Rioja [114], and Basque Country [103], with antiquities from 11 to 21 years, with no update since then. These regional catalogues clearly require updating, and they must include some species to protect, as in the case ofE. aphyllum in Aragón, La Rioja, and Navarre, or multiple species that appear necessary to include in the catalogue of Madrid according to De la Torre & Gamarra [38], which in fact is the oldest regional catalogue of Spain; however, there are also quite recent catalogues that need to be updated in a broad way, such as the cases of Andalusia [94], the Canary Islands [105], Cantabria [106], and Galicia [113].However, if the correlation is made between the antiquity of the catalogue and the number of species suggested to include, in this case, an acceptable correlation is obtained (R2=0.38; figure not shown), amounting to R2=0.57 if the curious case of Andalusia mentioned above is not taken into account (figure not shown). Although this regional catalogue dates from 2012, it is suggested to include at least four more species based on the Red List of the Vascular Flora of Andalusia [92]. For this regression, ten species are taken as the number of species to be included in the regional catalogue of Madrid, according to De la Torre and Gamarra [38]; in the case of Asturias, considering that the region has a more recent catalogue, six species have been taken as the number of species to be included in that regional catalogue. These results indicate that there is a direct correlation between the antiquity of the regional catalogue and the number of species to be included.A fact that must be considered when making such correlations is that not all the Spanish regions have the same floristic richness and that, logically, those regions with more variable and more sensitive habitats tend to house vulnerable species and will be more likely to protect a greater number of species. Such is the case of the regions hosting the country’s major mountain ranges, such as regions of Northern Spain and Cantabrian and Pyrenean (Galicia, Asturias, Cantabria, Basque Country, Navarre, and Catalonia) and the mountainous regions of the Centre-North (Castilla y León, Madrid) or South (Andalusia), where on average there are more than 16 genera of orchids, as opposed to other regions with a low diversity of orchids (Murcia, Aragón) [123].


## 3.1. At the European Level

Cypripedium calceolus L. andSpiranthes aestivalis(Poir.) Rich. are the two only orchid species included in theHabitats Directive whose distribution area includes Spain [77]. No orchid species whose distribution area includes Spain appear in theBerne Convention[78].


## 3.2. At the National Level

Although this report follows the nomenclature suggested by Flora iberica [76], which includes a total of 89 Iberian species belonging to 25 different genera, this study also adds four species of Canarian orchid flora not present in the Iberian orchid flora (adding the genusHabenaria, which is not present in the Iberian Peninsula):Habenaria tridactylites Lindl.,Himantoglossum metlesicsianum(W. P. Teschner) P. Delforge,Orchis canariensis Lindl., andSerapias mascaensis H. & G. Kretschner & Kreutz. There are also three species not listed in Flora iberica as individual species, but as a synonym of species already described above. However, the three species were identified as individual species after the publication of the corresponding volume of Flora iberica in which the family Orchidaceae is described [76]. These three species are as follows:(i)
Dactylorhiza cantabrica H.A. Pedersen: this species was named asDactylorhiza insularisÓ. Sánchez & Herrero [76]; it was described as new species for Lugo in 2006 [118].(ii)
Orchis robusta (Steph.) Gölz  & H. R. Reinhard: this species was described asOrchis laxiflorasubsp.robusta Lam. [52] or asOrchis palustris Jacq. var.robusta T. Steph. [76]. It is now considered endemic of La Albufera de Mallorca (Balearic Islands) as a separate species according to several authors. Bateman and collaborators, in their molecular studies, treated it as a species next toOrchis palustris Jacq., but independent of it; they even proposed a combination ofO. robustawithinAnacamptis robusta (T. Steph.) Bateman [49]. Authors such as Delforge also considerO. robusta a different species of all of them [44]. However, Tyteca and Klein combineO. robusta, A. robusta,andO. palustris in a different genus with the nameHerorchis robusta (T. Stephenson) Tyteca & Klein [60].(iii)
Serapias occidentalisC. Venhuis & P. Venhuis: this species was included withinSerapias vomeracea(Buró. Fil.) Briq. It has been proposed as a new species by hybridization ofSerapias vomeracea subsp.vomeracea(Burm. fil.) Briq.x Serapias cordigera L. at Badajoz (Extremadura) [119].Therefore, this work considers a total of 96 species present in Spain belonging to the Orchidaceae family.Once the National Catalogue of Threatened Species [79] was revised, no orchid species were found; subsequent additions and modifications includedH. metlesicsianum in the Danger of Extinction category (included asB. metlesicsiana) [80] and subsequentlyC. calceolus in the same category [81].In the recent update of the CNEA in 2011 [82], the two species listed first (H. metlesicsianum andC. calceolus) have the same category of protection, and two more species are added in the List of Wild Species in Regime of Special Protection,Orchis provincialis Balb. andS. aestivalis.O. provincialis presents a kind of Mediterranean distribution that restricts its presence mainly to the northern and western areas of the Iberian Peninsula.S. aestivalis is dispersed throughout almost all of the Iberian Peninsula, though more commonly found in the north and west and in specific habitats that are vulnerable to tampering, such as peat bogs, quagmires, reed beds, and wet heaths [76].The Law of Natural Heritage and Biodiversity [83] implements the National Catalogue of Threatened Species [79], which includes two species of orchids,C. calceolus, within Appendix  II (Animal and Plant Species of Community Interest Whose Conservation is Necessary to Designate Special Areas of Conservation), andS. aestivalis, within Appendix  V (Animal and Plant Species of Community Interest Requiring a Strict Protection).The categories of threat to species listed in Table1 are those described by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature [120].Table 1
The sixteen species included in2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (RL) [86] following IUCN threat categories [120]. It is shown if they are included in any regional catalogue (RC) and the threat category within them, as well as if they are included in any other catalogue of protected species.
Threat category in RL
Regional catalogues (RC) and threat category
Other catalogues
Corallorhiza trifida Châtel.
CR(EN)∗
RC of Aragón (Danger of Extinction)RC of Catalonia (Danger of Extinction)
Cypripedium calceolus L.
EN
RC of Aragón (Danger of Extinction)RC of Catalonia (Danger of Extinction)
CNEA (Danger of Extinction)Law Nat. Her. Biodiv. (Danger of Extinction)Habitats DirectiveAragón Recuperation Plan
Dactylorhiza cantabrica H. A. Pedersen
VU
Dactylorhiza insularis (Som.) O. Sánchez & Herrero
LC
RC of Extremadura (Special Interest)
Dactylorhiza sulphurea (Link) Franco
LC
RC of Castilla y León (Preferential Attention)
RL Basque Country (CR)RL Andalusia (DD)
Epipactis phyllanthes G. E. Sm.
VU
RL Basque Country (CR)
Epipogium aphyllum Sw.
CR
RC of Catalonia (Danger of Extinction)
Gymnadenia odoratissima (L.) Rich
DD(VU)∗
RC of Catalonia (Vulnerable)RC of Castilla y León (Preferential Attention)
Himantoglossum metlesicsianum (W. P. Teschner) P. Delforge
EN
RC of Canary Islands (Interest for Canarian Ecosystems)
CNEA (Danger of Extinction)
Nigritella gabasiana Teppner & E. Klein
LC(VU)∗
RC of Catalonia (Vulnerable)RC of Castilla y León (Preferential Attention)
RL Basque Country (CR)
Orchis canariensis Lindl.
VU
Orchis robusta (Steph.) Gölz & H. R. Reinhard
CR
Orchis spitzelii Saut.ex W. D. J. Koch
CR
RC of Catalonia (Danger of Extinction)
Serapias nurrica Corrias
VU
RC of Balearic Islands (Vulnerable)
Serapias occidentalis C. & P. Venhuis
VU
Serapias perez-chiscanoi Acedo
NT(VU)∗
RC of Extremadura (Danger of Extinction)
S
p
e
c
i
e
s
∗ included in 2000 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (VV.AA, 2000) with another threatened category.Threatened Species
CR: Critically Endangered
EN: Endangered
VU: VulnerableNot Threatened Species
NT: Near Threatened
LC: Least Concerned
DD: Data DeficientOut of the 96 species of orchids present in the Iberian Peninsula, Balearic Islands, and Canary Islands, 16 species are included in the Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table1) [86], which were already included in the Red List of the Threatened Spanish Vascular Flora of 2008 [85]; five of these species are catalogued as not threatened species (i.e., NT, LC, or DD categories), which means that around 12–17% (depending on whether those five species are included) of the Spanish orchid flora are listed with some degree of threat nationwide, according to the 2010 Red List. Out of these 16 species, there are only two Canarian species—H. metlesicsianum andO. canariensis. So, if these two Canarian threatened species are omitted, there would be 14 species (or 9 species, if those five species mentioned above are not considered) with some degree of threat out of a total of 92 Iberian species (excluding the four species from the Canary Islands), that is, around 10–15% of the Iberian orchid flora.


### 3.2.1. Threatened Species: Critically Endangered (CR)

At the national level, there are four species listed as Critically Endangered (CR), according to the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora:Corallorhiza trifida Châtel., Epipogium aphyllum Sw., O. robusta,andOrchis spitzelii Saut. ex. W. D. J. Koch (Table 1) [86].C. trifida. In the 2000 Red List of Threatened Vascular Flora of Spain, this species was listed as Endangered (EN), having gone to be classified as Critically Endangered (CR) in the 2008 Red List of Threatened Vascular Flora of Spain [85]; it went from having five 10×10 Km UTM coordinates in 2000 to only one 10×10 Km UTM in 2008. This species is still included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86]. On the other hand, this species appears in the RC of Aragón (Danger of Extinction) (Table 1), where it currently holds the only recently confirmed population (Ordesa, Huesca, Aragón) [87] and in the RC of Catalonia (Danger of Extinction) (Table 1), where it is probably extinct, since the four populations that correspond to four 10×10 Km UTM coordinates have not been confirmed recently [87]. It should, therefore, be included in the CNEA and an urgent plan to recover such an endangered orchid should be developed.E. aphyllum. This species is included in the 2010 Spanish Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86] and in the RC of Catalonia (Danger of Extinction) (Table 1), where its only population in the Pallars Sobirà of Lleida has not been confirmed recently; on the other hand, this species has two 10×10 Km UTM more, one in Sierra Cebollera (La Rioja) and the other one between Huesca and Navarre, in the Valley of Linza (Huesca, Aragón) and the Belagua Valley (Navarre) [87]; therefore, it is suggested that this species should be included in the RC of Aragón, RC of Navarra, and RC of La Rioja, where it is currently not included, most likely because these catalogues are relatively old, dating back to 1995, 1997, and 1998, respectively. Of course, this species should be included in the CNEA as well.O. robusta. Although its description dates from 1976 [121], this species has been recently discontinued as a subspecies [44, 49], meaning that it is included only in the 2008 and 2010 Red Lists of Spanish Vascular Flora [85, 86]. It is endemic to the Balearic Islands and is found only in the Albufera of Mallorca (Balearic Islands). Therefore,O. robusta should be included in the CNEA as well as in the RC of Baleares.O. spitzelli. Although this species is relatively widely distributed, with twenty-one 10×10 Km UTM coordinates, it currently only has a single 10×10 Km UTM recently confirmed in the Sierra del Cadí (Lleida, Catalonia). For this reason, this species is listed as Critically Endangered (CR) [85, 86] and it is only listed in the RC of Catalonia (Danger of Extinction) (Table 1), while it does not appear in the CNEA. Therefore, it is strongly suggested that this species be included in the CNEA.These four species of orchids listed as Critically Endangered in Spain (CR) should have specific plans of recovery.


### 3.2.2. Threatened Species: Endangered (EN)

There are two species classified as Endangered (EN) according to the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86]:C. calceolusandH. metlesicsianum.C. calceolus. This species is most likely, among all species of orchids included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora, the species that is included in the most catalogues of protection, is the most studied, and has the most protection, since the threat to this species in the Iberian Peninsula was detected more than twenty years ago, being, along withS. aestivalis, the only two species protected in Spain that are included in the Habitats Directive [77]. In addition,C. calceolus andH. metlesicsianumare the only two species of Spanish orchids included in the CNEA in the category Danger of Extinction [82] and the only species, along withS. aestivalis, which are included in the Law of Natural Heritage and Biodiversity [83].C. calceolus is also included in the RC of Aragón (Table 1) and the RC of Catalonia (Table 1) and has appeared in the Atlas and Red Book of the Threatened Vascular Flora of Spain since 2004 [87]. This is the only orchid that has a Plan of Recovery in Spain [90]. Since the distribution ofC. calceolus in Spain is restricted to Aragón and Catalonia, it does not seem necessary to include this species in any other catalogue, neither regional nor national.H. metlesicsianum. This is one of the two Canarian species—along withO. canariensis (VU)—which are included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86].H. metlesicsianum, whose distribution is restricted to Tenerife island (Canary Islands), has been included in the Atlas and Red Book of the Threatened Vascular Flora of Spain since 2004 [87] and it is included in the CNEA [80, 82] and the RC of the Canary Islands [104]; therefore, this species does not need to be included in any other protection catalogue.


### 3.2.3. Vulnerable Species (VU)

The vulnerable orchid species includeD. cantabrica,Epipactis phyllanthesG.E. Sm.,O. canariensis,Serapias nurrica Corrias andS. occidentalis.There are sixteen species included in the Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table1) [86], and four of them are not included in any other national or regional catalogue. Three of these species are the above-mentionedD. cantabrica, O. canariensis andS. occidentalis. The fourth one isO. robusta(CR), which was discussed above.These three species—O. robusta,D. cantabrica, andS. occidentalis—most likely are in the Red List and no other catalogue because they have recently been described as separate species [49, 118, 119];O. canariensis has not been described so recently but shows a relatively restricted distribution (Lanzarote and Fuerteventura; Canary Islands). Undoubtedly, the most troubling case isO. robusta, which is classified as Critically Endangered (CR); the other species, recent description or not, are not urgent in the short term, since they are classified as vulnerable (VU).Nevertheless, and with the exception ofS. nurrica andE. phyllanthes, none of the other three listed species as VU are found in any catalogue of protection; the recommendation would be to include those five species within the CNEA; in addition,D. cantabrica, which has been cited in O’Couto and Caurel (Lugo, Galicia), should be included in the RC of Galicia;E. phyllanthes, cited in Liencres (Santander, Cantabria) and Gorliz (Vizcaya, Basque Country), should be included in the RC of Cantabria and the RC of the Basque Country (although it is already included in the Red List of the Basque Country [93]);O. canariensis, endemic to the Canary Islands (Lanzarote and Fuerteventura) should be included in the RC of the Canary Islands;S. occidentalis, cited in Campo Lugar, Obanco, and Aljucén (Cáceres, Extremadura), should be included in the RC of Extremadura.


### 3.2.4. Other Categories, Not Threatened Species: Near Threatened (NT), Least Concern (LC), and Data Deficient (DD)

As species catalogued as Near Threatened (NT), nationally, onlySerapias perez-chiscanoi Acedo is included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86] (Table 1); this species, in the 2000 Red List of Threatened Vascular Flora of Spain [84], had been classified as Vulnerable (VU), but the recent discovery of new populations of this species has led to its cataloguing as NT since 2008 [19, 85, 122]. This species is endemic to Portugal and Spain and more specifically to Extremadura (in Spain). This species is included in the RC of Extremadura as a species in Danger of Extinction [112]. Given that this regional catalogue is nine years older than the Spanish Red List, it explains that it seems not to be updated.A second group of species under no threat at the national level but included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86] are classified as Least Concerned (LC); in this group areD. insularis,Dactylorhiza sulphurea (Link) Franco, andNigritella gabasiana Teppner & E. Klein.D. insularis. This species is also included in the RC of Extremadura [112] as a species of Special Concern, since, without being regulated in any of the categories of greatest threat (Endangered, Sensitive to Alteration of Their Habitat, Vulnerable), it is worthy of particular attention on the basis of its scientific, ecological, and cultural value or by its singularity [112].D. sulphurea. This species is included in the RC of Castilla y León [109] as one of Preferential Attention, since, without meeting the conditions to be attached to any of the categories of greatest threat (Endangered, Vulnerable, Sensitive to Alteration of Their Habitat, and Of Special Attention), the species is scarce in Castilla y León, presenting threatened or reduced populations, which could be affected by different disturbances or that are linked to habitats in regression [109]. Additionally, the species is classified as Vulnerable in the RC of the Basque Country (included asDactylorhiza markusii (Tineo) H. Baumann & Künkele) [102]. It has also been recently included in the Red List of the Basque Country as Critically Endangered (CR) [93], which suggests that its status in the RC of the Basque Country as Vulnerable should be changed to Critically Endangered (CR). It was also included in the Red List of the Vascular Flora of Andalusia in the category of Data Deficient (DD) [92].N. gabasiana. At the national level, this species was included as Vulnerable (VU) in the 2000 Red List of Threatened Vascular Flora of Spain [84], listed as Least Concern (LC) in the 2008 Red List of Threatened Vascular Flora of Spain [85], and remains so catalogued [86]. Additionally, it is classified as a Rare species in the RC of the Basque Country [102], and it is also included in the Red List of the Basque Country as Critically Endangered (CR) [93]; this fact does suggest that the status of this species in the RC of Basque Country as Rare should be changed to Critically Endangered (CR). It is also listed as Preferential Attention in the RC of Castilla y León, since, without meeting the conditions to be attached to any of the categories of greatest threat (Endangered, Vulnerable, Sensitive to Alteration of Their Habitat, and Of Special Attention), the species is scarce in Castilla y León, showing threatened or reduced populations and that they could be affected by different disturbances or are linked to habitats in regression [109].Finally,Gymnadenia odoratissima (L.) Rich is classified at the national level as Data Deficient (DD) according to the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86]. At the regional level, this species is listed as Preferential Attention in the RC of Castilla y León, since, without meeting the conditions to be attached to any of the categories of greatest threat (Endangered, Vulnerable, Sensitive to Alteration of Their Habitat, and Of Special Attention), it is scarce in Castilla y León, presenting threatened or reduced populations and that they could be affected by different disturbances or are linked to habitats in regression [109]. This species is catalogued as Vulnerable according to RC of Catalonia [110].


## 3.2.1. Threatened Species: Critically Endangered (CR)

At the national level, there are four species listed as Critically Endangered (CR), according to the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora:Corallorhiza trifida Châtel., Epipogium aphyllum Sw., O. robusta,andOrchis spitzelii Saut. ex. W. D. J. Koch (Table 1) [86].C. trifida. In the 2000 Red List of Threatened Vascular Flora of Spain, this species was listed as Endangered (EN), having gone to be classified as Critically Endangered (CR) in the 2008 Red List of Threatened Vascular Flora of Spain [85]; it went from having five 10×10 Km UTM coordinates in 2000 to only one 10×10 Km UTM in 2008. This species is still included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86]. On the other hand, this species appears in the RC of Aragón (Danger of Extinction) (Table 1), where it currently holds the only recently confirmed population (Ordesa, Huesca, Aragón) [87] and in the RC of Catalonia (Danger of Extinction) (Table 1), where it is probably extinct, since the four populations that correspond to four 10×10 Km UTM coordinates have not been confirmed recently [87]. It should, therefore, be included in the CNEA and an urgent plan to recover such an endangered orchid should be developed.E. aphyllum. This species is included in the 2010 Spanish Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86] and in the RC of Catalonia (Danger of Extinction) (Table 1), where its only population in the Pallars Sobirà of Lleida has not been confirmed recently; on the other hand, this species has two 10×10 Km UTM more, one in Sierra Cebollera (La Rioja) and the other one between Huesca and Navarre, in the Valley of Linza (Huesca, Aragón) and the Belagua Valley (Navarre) [87]; therefore, it is suggested that this species should be included in the RC of Aragón, RC of Navarra, and RC of La Rioja, where it is currently not included, most likely because these catalogues are relatively old, dating back to 1995, 1997, and 1998, respectively. Of course, this species should be included in the CNEA as well.O. robusta. Although its description dates from 1976 [121], this species has been recently discontinued as a subspecies [44, 49], meaning that it is included only in the 2008 and 2010 Red Lists of Spanish Vascular Flora [85, 86]. It is endemic to the Balearic Islands and is found only in the Albufera of Mallorca (Balearic Islands). Therefore,O. robusta should be included in the CNEA as well as in the RC of Baleares.O. spitzelli. Although this species is relatively widely distributed, with twenty-one 10×10 Km UTM coordinates, it currently only has a single 10×10 Km UTM recently confirmed in the Sierra del Cadí (Lleida, Catalonia). For this reason, this species is listed as Critically Endangered (CR) [85, 86] and it is only listed in the RC of Catalonia (Danger of Extinction) (Table 1), while it does not appear in the CNEA. Therefore, it is strongly suggested that this species be included in the CNEA.These four species of orchids listed as Critically Endangered in Spain (CR) should have specific plans of recovery.


## 3.2.2. Threatened Species: Endangered (EN)

There are two species classified as Endangered (EN) according to the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86]:C. calceolusandH. metlesicsianum.C. calceolus. This species is most likely, among all species of orchids included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora, the species that is included in the most catalogues of protection, is the most studied, and has the most protection, since the threat to this species in the Iberian Peninsula was detected more than twenty years ago, being, along withS. aestivalis, the only two species protected in Spain that are included in the Habitats Directive [77]. In addition,C. calceolus andH. metlesicsianumare the only two species of Spanish orchids included in the CNEA in the category Danger of Extinction [82] and the only species, along withS. aestivalis, which are included in the Law of Natural Heritage and Biodiversity [83].C. calceolus is also included in the RC of Aragón (Table 1) and the RC of Catalonia (Table 1) and has appeared in the Atlas and Red Book of the Threatened Vascular Flora of Spain since 2004 [87]. This is the only orchid that has a Plan of Recovery in Spain [90]. Since the distribution ofC. calceolus in Spain is restricted to Aragón and Catalonia, it does not seem necessary to include this species in any other catalogue, neither regional nor national.H. metlesicsianum. This is one of the two Canarian species—along withO. canariensis (VU)—which are included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86].H. metlesicsianum, whose distribution is restricted to Tenerife island (Canary Islands), has been included in the Atlas and Red Book of the Threatened Vascular Flora of Spain since 2004 [87] and it is included in the CNEA [80, 82] and the RC of the Canary Islands [104]; therefore, this species does not need to be included in any other protection catalogue.


## 3.2.3. Vulnerable Species (VU)

The vulnerable orchid species includeD. cantabrica,Epipactis phyllanthesG.E. Sm.,O. canariensis,Serapias nurrica Corrias andS. occidentalis.There are sixteen species included in the Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table1) [86], and four of them are not included in any other national or regional catalogue. Three of these species are the above-mentionedD. cantabrica, O. canariensis andS. occidentalis. The fourth one isO. robusta(CR), which was discussed above.These three species—O. robusta,D. cantabrica, andS. occidentalis—most likely are in the Red List and no other catalogue because they have recently been described as separate species [49, 118, 119];O. canariensis has not been described so recently but shows a relatively restricted distribution (Lanzarote and Fuerteventura; Canary Islands). Undoubtedly, the most troubling case isO. robusta, which is classified as Critically Endangered (CR); the other species, recent description or not, are not urgent in the short term, since they are classified as vulnerable (VU).Nevertheless, and with the exception ofS. nurrica andE. phyllanthes, none of the other three listed species as VU are found in any catalogue of protection; the recommendation would be to include those five species within the CNEA; in addition,D. cantabrica, which has been cited in O’Couto and Caurel (Lugo, Galicia), should be included in the RC of Galicia;E. phyllanthes, cited in Liencres (Santander, Cantabria) and Gorliz (Vizcaya, Basque Country), should be included in the RC of Cantabria and the RC of the Basque Country (although it is already included in the Red List of the Basque Country [93]);O. canariensis, endemic to the Canary Islands (Lanzarote and Fuerteventura) should be included in the RC of the Canary Islands;S. occidentalis, cited in Campo Lugar, Obanco, and Aljucén (Cáceres, Extremadura), should be included in the RC of Extremadura.


## 3.2.4. Other Categories, Not Threatened Species: Near Threatened (NT), Least Concern (LC), and Data Deficient (DD)

As species catalogued as Near Threatened (NT), nationally, onlySerapias perez-chiscanoi Acedo is included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86] (Table 1); this species, in the 2000 Red List of Threatened Vascular Flora of Spain [84], had been classified as Vulnerable (VU), but the recent discovery of new populations of this species has led to its cataloguing as NT since 2008 [19, 85, 122]. This species is endemic to Portugal and Spain and more specifically to Extremadura (in Spain). This species is included in the RC of Extremadura as a species in Danger of Extinction [112]. Given that this regional catalogue is nine years older than the Spanish Red List, it explains that it seems not to be updated.A second group of species under no threat at the national level but included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86] are classified as Least Concerned (LC); in this group areD. insularis,Dactylorhiza sulphurea (Link) Franco, andNigritella gabasiana Teppner & E. Klein.D. insularis. This species is also included in the RC of Extremadura [112] as a species of Special Concern, since, without being regulated in any of the categories of greatest threat (Endangered, Sensitive to Alteration of Their Habitat, Vulnerable), it is worthy of particular attention on the basis of its scientific, ecological, and cultural value or by its singularity [112].D. sulphurea. This species is included in the RC of Castilla y León [109] as one of Preferential Attention, since, without meeting the conditions to be attached to any of the categories of greatest threat (Endangered, Vulnerable, Sensitive to Alteration of Their Habitat, and Of Special Attention), the species is scarce in Castilla y León, presenting threatened or reduced populations, which could be affected by different disturbances or that are linked to habitats in regression [109]. Additionally, the species is classified as Vulnerable in the RC of the Basque Country (included asDactylorhiza markusii (Tineo) H. Baumann & Künkele) [102]. It has also been recently included in the Red List of the Basque Country as Critically Endangered (CR) [93], which suggests that its status in the RC of the Basque Country as Vulnerable should be changed to Critically Endangered (CR). It was also included in the Red List of the Vascular Flora of Andalusia in the category of Data Deficient (DD) [92].N. gabasiana. At the national level, this species was included as Vulnerable (VU) in the 2000 Red List of Threatened Vascular Flora of Spain [84], listed as Least Concern (LC) in the 2008 Red List of Threatened Vascular Flora of Spain [85], and remains so catalogued [86]. Additionally, it is classified as a Rare species in the RC of the Basque Country [102], and it is also included in the Red List of the Basque Country as Critically Endangered (CR) [93]; this fact does suggest that the status of this species in the RC of Basque Country as Rare should be changed to Critically Endangered (CR). It is also listed as Preferential Attention in the RC of Castilla y León, since, without meeting the conditions to be attached to any of the categories of greatest threat (Endangered, Vulnerable, Sensitive to Alteration of Their Habitat, and Of Special Attention), the species is scarce in Castilla y León, showing threatened or reduced populations and that they could be affected by different disturbances or are linked to habitats in regression [109].Finally,Gymnadenia odoratissima (L.) Rich is classified at the national level as Data Deficient (DD) according to the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86]. At the regional level, this species is listed as Preferential Attention in the RC of Castilla y León, since, without meeting the conditions to be attached to any of the categories of greatest threat (Endangered, Vulnerable, Sensitive to Alteration of Their Habitat, and Of Special Attention), it is scarce in Castilla y León, presenting threatened or reduced populations and that they could be affected by different disturbances or are linked to habitats in regression [109]. This species is catalogued as Vulnerable according to RC of Catalonia [110].


## 3.3. At the Regional Level

At the regional level, from the review of the corresponding seventeen regional catalogues of each autonomous Spanish community and the two existing regional red lists for Andalusia and the Basque Country [92, 93], the following results emerge.Out of the 96 species of orchids existing in Spain, up to a total of 69 are included in any catalogue of regional protection or regional red list (including 12 of 16 protected species nationwide), that is, around 72%. Only four out of the sixteen species included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora are not included in any regional catalogue nor any regional red list (D. cantabrica, O. canariensis, O. robusta, andS. occidentalis) (Table 1) [86]. If both, the species included in the national and regional catalogues are considered, that is, also including these four species, and then 73 species are included in some catalogue of protection, which means that 76% of the Spanish orchid flora are listed with some figure of legal protection.In Tables2–20 are the species of orchids included in each of the regional catalogues and the cataloguing as protected species for each autonomous community, indicating the piece of legislation that regulates it. These tables are as follows.Table 2
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Andalusia (DEC 23/2012).
RC of Andalusia (LAW 8/2003; DEC. 23/2012)
Neottia nidus-avis (L.) Rich
Vulnerable
Ophrys atlantica Munby
Vulnerable
Ophrys speculumLink subsp.lusitanica O. Danesch & E. Danesch
Vulnerable (before as in Danger of Extinction)
Spiranthes spiralis (L.) Chevall.
Wild species in Protection RegimeTable 3
Species included in the Red List of the Vascular Flora of Andalusia [92].
Red List of Andalusia
Dactylorhiza markusii (Tineo) H. Baumann & Künkele = D. sulphurea (Link) Franco
DD
Dactylorhiza sulphurea (Link) Franco∗
DD
Epipactis lusitanica D. Tyteca
DD
Epipactis microphylla (Ehrh.) Sw.
DD
Gennaria diphylla(Link) Parl.
VU
Gymnadenia conopsea (L.) R. Br. in W.T. Aiton
VU
Listera ovata (L.) R. Br. in W.T. Aiton
DD
Neottia nidus-avis (L.) Rich∗∗
EN
Ophrys atlantica
M
u
n
b
y
∗
∗
DD
Ophrys speculumLink subsp.lusitanica O. Danesch &  E.Danesch∗∗
DD
Orchis palustris Jacq.
DD
Platanthera algeriensis Batt. & Trab.
DD
Spiranthes spiralis (L.) Chevall.∗∗
DD
S
p
e
c
i
e
s
∗ included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86]. Species∗∗ included in the RC of Andalusia.Table 4
Species included in the regional catalogue (R.C.) of Aragón (DEC. 49/1995; ORD. 2004/03/04).
RC of Aragón (DEC. 49/1995; ORD. 4/03/2004; DEC. 181/2005)
Corallorhiza trifida
C
h
â
t
e
l
.
∗
In Danger of Extinction
Cypripedium calceolus
L
.
∗
In Danger of Extinction
Ophrys riojanaC. E. Hermos. = O. sphegodes Mill.
Sensitive to Habitat Alteration
Orchis simia Lam.
Vulnerable
S
p
e
c
i
e
s
∗ included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86].Table 5
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Asturias (DEC. 65/1995).
RC of Asturias (DEC. 65/1995)
NoneTable 6
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Balearic Islands (DEC. 65/1995).
RC of Balearic Islands (DEC. 75/2005)
Cephalanthera rubra (L.) Rich.
Vulnerable
Gymnadenia conopsea (L.) R. Br. in W.T. Aiton
Vulnerable
Neottia nidus-avis(L.) Rich.
Vulnerable
Orchis cazorlensis Lacaita
Vulnerable
Orchis palustris Jacq.
Vulnerable
Serapias nurrica
C
o
r
r
i
a
s
∗
Vulnerable
S
p
e
c
i
e
s
∗ included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86].Table 7
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Basque Country (ORD. 3471/1998).
RC of Basque Country (ORD. 3471/1998)
Coeloglossum viride (L.) Hartm.
Rare
Dactylorhiza markusii(Tineo) H. Baumann & Künkele= D. sulphurea(Link) Franco∗
Vulnerable
Epipactis palustris (L.) Crantz
Rare
Himantoglossum hircinum (L.) Spreng.
Special Interest
Nigritella gabasianaTeppner &E.Klein∗
Rare
Orchis italicaPoir. in Lam.
Vulnerable
Spiranthes aestivalis(Poir.) Rich
Rare
S
p
e
c
i
e
s
∗ included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86].Table 8
Species included in the Red List of Basque Country [93].
Red List of Basque Country
Barlia robertiana(R. J. Loisel) Greuter∗∗
CR
Coeloglossum viride(L.) Hartm.
VU
Dactylorhiza sulphurea(Link) Franco∗
CR
Epipactis palustris (L.) Crantz
VU
Epipactis phyllanthesG. E. Sm.∗∗∗
CR
Himantoglossum hircinum (L.) Spreng
NT
Nigritella gabasianaTeppner &  E.Klein∗
CR
Ophrys aveyronensis(J. J. Wood) P. Delforge in P. Delforge &  D.Tyteca∗∗
VU
Orchis cazorlensis
L
a
c
a
i
t
a
∗
∗
CR
Orchis italicaPoir. in Lam.
VU
Orchis papilionacea
L
.
∗
∗
DD
Spiranthes aestivalis(Poir.) Rich
VU
S
p
e
c
i
e
s
∗ included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86]. Species∗∗ not included in the RC of Basque Country.Table 9
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Canary Islands (DEC. 151/2001; LAW 4/2010).
RC of Canary Islands (DEC. 151/2001; LAW 4/2010)
Himantoglossum metlesicsianum(W. P. Tesch.) P.Delforge∗
Interest for Canary Ecosystems (before as in Danger of Extinction)
S
p
e
c
i
e
s
∗ included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86].Table 10
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Cantabria (DEC. 120/2008).
RC of Cantabria (DEC. 120/2008)
Epipactis palustris (L.) Krantz
In Danger of ExtinctionTable 11
Species included in the regional catalogue (R.C.) of Castilla-La Mancha (DEC. 33/1998; DEC. 200/2001).
R.C of Castilla-La Mancha (DEC. 33/1998; DEC. 200/2001)
Aceras anthropophorum(L.) W. T. Aiton
Special Interest
Coeloglossum viride(L.) Hartm.
Special Interest
Dactylorhiza incarnata(L.) Soó
Vulnerable
Dactylorhiza sambucina(L.) Soó
Vulnerable
Dactylorhizaspp.
Special Interest
Epipactis distansArv.-Touv.
Special Interest
Epipactis palustris(L.) Crantz
Special Interest
Gymnadenia conopsea(L.) R. Br. in W. T. Aiton
Special Interest
Himantoglossum hircinum (L.) Spreng.
Special Interest
Listera ovata (L.) R. Br. in W. T. Aiton
Special Interest
Neottia nidus-avis(L.) Rich
Special Interest
Ophrys insectifera L.
Vulnerable
Platantheraspp.
Special Interest
Serapias cordigera L.
Special InterestTable 12
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Castilla y León (DEC. 63/2007).
RC of Castilla y León (DEC. 63/2007)
Barlia robertiana (R.J.Loisel) Greuter
Preferential Attention
Dactylorhiza sulphurea (Link) Franco∗
Preferential Attention
Epipactis fageticola(C.E. Hermos.) Devillers-Tersch. & Devillers
Preferential Attention
Epipactis microphylla(Ehrh..) Sw.
Preferential Attention
Epipactis palustris(L.) Crantz
Preferential Attention
Epipactis tremolsiiPau
Preferential Attention
Gymnadenia odoratissima(L.) Rich∗
Preferential Attention
Nigritella gabasianaTeppner &  E.Klein∗
Preferential Attention
Ophrys insectifera L.
Preferential Attention
Orchis cazorlensis Lacaita
Preferential Attention
Orchis conica Willd.
Preferential Attention
Orchis pallens L.
Preferential Attention
Orchis papilionacea L.
Preferential Attention
Orchis provincialis Balb. ex. Lam. & D.C
Preferential Attention
Platanthera algeriensisBatt. & Trab.
Vulnerable
Platanthera chlorantha (Custer) Rchb. in Mössler
Preferential Attention
Pseudorchis albida (L.) Á. Löve & D. Löve
Preferential Attention
Spiranthes aestivalis (Poir.) Rich
Preferential Attention
S
p
e
c
i
e
s
∗ included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86].Table 13
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Catalonia (DEC. 172/2008).
RC of Catalonia (DEC. 172/2008)
Coeloglossum viride(L.) Hartm.
Strictly Protected
Corallorhiza trifida Châtel.∗
In Danger of Extinction
Cypripedium calceolus
L
.
∗
In Danger of Extinction
Epipogium aphyllum
S
w
.
∗
In Danger of Extinction
Gymnadenia odoratissima(L.) Rich∗
Vulnerable
Ophrys catalaunica(O. Danesch & E. Danesch.) Soca= O.bertoloniiMoretti subsp. catalaunica(O. Danesch & E. Danesch.) Soca
Strictly Protected
Orchis palustrisJacq.
Vulnerable
Orchis spitzeliiSaut. ex W. D. J. Koch∗
In Danger of Extinction
Spiranthes aestivalis (Poir.) Rich
Vulnerable
S
p
e
c
i
e
s
∗ included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86].Table 14
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Comunidad Valenciana (DEC. 70/2009).
RC of Comunidad Valenciana (DEC. 70/2009)
Aceras anthropophorum(L.) W. T. Aiton
Watched species
Barlia robertiana (R. J. Loisel) Greuter
Protected species not catalogued
Cephalanthera damasonium(Mill.) Druce
Watched species
Coeloglossum viride (L.) Hartm.
Vulnerable
Dactylorhiza fuchsii (Druce) Soó
Watched species
Dactylorhiza incarnata (L.) Soó
Vulnerable
Dactylorhiza insularis (Som.) O. Sánchez &  Herrero∗
Vulnerable
Dactylorhiza maculata (L.) Soó
Protected species not catalogued
Dactylorhiza sambucina(L.) Soó
Watched species
Epipactis atrorubensHoffm. ex Besser
Watched species
Epipactis distans
Watched species
Epipactis fageticola
Vulnerable
Epipactis palustris (L.) Crantz
Protected species not catalogued
Epipactis rhodanensis Gévaudar & Robatsch
Watched species
Epipactis tremolsiiPau
Watched species
Goodyera repens (L.) R. Br. in W. T. Aiton
Watched species
Gymnadenia conopsea (L.) R. Br. in W. T. Aiton
Watched species
Limodorum trabutianum Batt.
Watched species
Listera ovata(L.) R. Br. in W. T. Aiton
Protected species not catalogued
Neottia nidus-avis (L.) Rich
Protected species not catalogued
Ophrys castellanaDevillers-Tesch. & Devillers= O. sphegodesMill.
Protected species not catalogued
Ophrys incubaceaBianca= O. sphegodesMill.
Protected species not catalogued
Ophrys sphegodes Mill.
Watched species
Orchis cazorlensisLacaita
Protected species not catalogued
Orchis collinaBanks & Sol. ex. Russell
Vulnerable
Orchis conica Willd.
Vulnerable
Orchis coriophoraL. subsp. martrinii (Timb.-Lagr.) Nyman
Watched species
Orchis fragrans (Pollini) K. Richt.= O. coriophoraL. subsp. fragrans(Pollini) K. Richt.
Protected species not catalogued
Orchis italicaPoir. in Lam.
Watched species
Orchis langei K. Richt.
Watched species
Orchis papilionaceaL.
In Danger of Extinction
Orchis picta (Loisl.) K. Richt. = O. morio L. subsp. picta (Loisl.) K. Richt.
Watched species
Orchis purpurea Huds.
Vulnerable
Orchis ustulata L.
Protected species not catalogued
Platanthera bifolia (L.) Rich
Protected species not catalogued
Platanthera chlorantha (Custer) Rchb. in Mössler
Protected species not catalogued
Serapias lingua L.
Vulnerable
Serapias parviflora Parl.
Protected species not catalogued
Serapias strictiflora Welw. ex Veiga
Vulnerable
Spiranthes aestivalis(Poir.) Rich
In Danger of Extinction
Spiranthes spiralis (L.) Chevall.
Watched species
S
p
e
c
i
e
s
∗ included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86].Table 15
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Extremadura (DEC. 37/2001).
RC of Extremadura (DEC. 37/2001)
Cephalanthera rubra(L.) Rich
Special Interest
Dactylorhiza insularis(Som.) O. Sánchez &  Herrero∗
Special Interest
Limodorum trabutianumBatt.
Vulnerable
Neottia nidus-avis(L.) Rich
Vulnerable
Ophrys dyris(Maire) Soó in G. Keller Schltr. & Soó = O. fuscaLinksubsp. dyris(Maire) Soó in G. Keller Schltr. & Soó
Special Interest
Orchis italicaPoir. in Lam.
Special Interest
Orchis langeiK. Richt.
Special Interest
Orchis papilionáceaL.
Special Interest
Serapias perez-chiscanoi
A
c
e
d
o
∗
In Danger of Extinction
Spiranthes aestivalis(Poir.) Rich
Special Interest
S
p
e
c
i
e
s
∗ included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86].Table 16
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Galicia (DEC. 88/2007).
RC of Galicia (DEC. 88/2007)
Spiranthes aestivalis (Poir.) Rich
VulnerableTable 17
Species included in the regional catalogue (R.C.) of La Rioja (DEC. 59/1998).
R.C. of La Rioja (DEC. 59/1998)
NoneTable 18
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Madrid (DEC. 18/1992).
RC of Madrid (DEC. 18/1992)
Platanthera bifolia (L.) Rich
Vulnerable
Neottia nidus-avis(L.) Rich
VulnerableTable 19
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Murcia (DEC. 50/2003).
RC of Murcia (DEC. 50/2003)
Aceras anthropophorum(L.) W.T. Aiton
Vulnerable
Barlia robertiana(R.J.Loisel) Greuter
Vulnerable
Cephalanthera rubra(L.) Rich
Vulnerable
Dactylorhiza elata (Poir.) Soó
Vulnerable
Epipactis cardinaBenito & C.E. Hermos.
Special Interest
Himantoglossum hircinum (L.) Spreng.
Vulnerable
Listera ovata(L.) R. Br. in W.T. Aiton
Vulnerable
Ophrys incubacea Bianca = O. sphegodes Mill.
Special Interest
Orchis cazorlensisLacaita
Vulnerable
Orchis purpurea Huds.
Vulnerable
Serapias lingua L.
Vulnerable
Serapias parviflora Parl.
VulnerableTable 20
Species included in the regional catalogue (RC) of Navarre (DEC. 94 /1997).
RC of Navarre (DEC. Foral 94/1997)
Orchis papilionaceaL.
Sensitive to Habitat AlterationTable2 specifies the species included in the regional catalogue that lists endangered species of Andalusia [94, 95]; Table 3 specifies those species that are included in the Red List of the Vascular Flora of Andalusia [92]; Table 4 is for Aragón [96, 98]; Table 5 is for Asturias [99]; Table 6 is for the Balearic Islands [100]; Table 7 is for the Basque Country [101–103]; Table 8 specifies those species that are included in the Red List of the Vascular Flora of the Basque Country [93]; Table 9 is for Canary Islands [104, 105]; Table 10 is for Cantabria [106]; Table 11 is for Castilla-La Mancha [107, 108]; Table 12 is for Castilla y León [109]; Table 13 is for Catalonia [110]; Table 14 is for Comunidad Valenciana [111]; Table 15 is for Extremadura [112]; Table 16 is for Galicia [113]; Table 17 is for La Rioja [114]; Table 18 is for Madrid [115]; Table 19 is for Murcia [116]; Table 20 is for Navarre [117].The Red List of Andalusia (Table3; [94, 95]) is not an official list with legislation but should serve as a basis for whether to include certain species in the RC of Andalusia (Table 2). Andalusia’s RC has one notable absence,D. sulphurea. In addition,Gennaria diphylla (Link) Parl. andGymnadenia conopsea (L.) R. Br. in W. T. Aiton, both listed as VU in the Red List of Andalusia, should be included as well in the RC of Andalusia [92].The RC of Aragón [96], its update being relatively recent [97, 98] (Table 4), seems to collect the most endangered species in this region, some of them clearly nationally threatened, such asC. trifida andC. calceolus (Table 1) [86]; however, it would be convenient to includeE. aphyllum, a species included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora as a Critically Endangered species (CR) (Table 1) [86].In the case of Asturias [99] (Table 5), despite its great biodiversity of flora, including orchids, the RC of Asturias does not include any species of the Orchidaceae family.In the RC of the Balearic Islands [100] (Table 6), the presence ofS. nurricais notable, as it is also included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (VU) (Table 1) [86]. The inclusion ofO. robusta in the regional catalogue should be pressing, as it is already included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora as Critically Endangered (CR) (Table 1) [86].The Red List of the Basque Country [93] (Table 8) includes the seven species of the RC of the Basque Country, generally with degrees of threat greater than those designated in the RC of the Basque Country: bothD. sulphurea andN. gabasiana are listed as CR, and the other species listed as Rare in the RC of the Basque Country(C. viride, E. palustris,andS. spiralis) are catalogued in the Red List of the Basque Country as VU, as well asOrchis italic Por in Lam., which is still listed as VU. The seventh species,Himantoglossum hircinum (L.) Spreng.,is catalogued as Special Interest in the RC of the Basque Country whereas in the Red List of the Basque Country it is catalogued as Near Threatened. The Red List of the Basque Country adds to these seven species five more:E. phyllanthes, which is listed as CR in the Basque Country and as VU at the national level according to the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86];Barlia robertiana (R. J. Loisel) Greuter andOrchis cazorlensis Lacaita, both listed as CR;Ophrys aveyronensis (J. J. Wood) P. Delforge in P. Delforge & D. Tyteca as VU; andOrchis papilionacea L., which is classified as DD [93]. It would be advisable, therefore, to include at leastE. phyllantheswithin the RC of the Basque Country, a species cited in this community only at Gorliz (Bilbao). It would also be advisable to include the other four species, especially the two species listed as CR (B. robertiana andO. cazorlensis) and to a lesser extentO. aveyronensis (VU) andO. papilionacea (DD).The RC of the Canary Islands [104, 105] (Table 9), which includesH. metlesicsianum (included asB. metlesicsiana. in the category Extinction Danger) [104], should be expanded withO. canariensis, included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora as Vulnerable (VU) (Table 1) [86].The RC of Cantabria [106] (Table 10) includes only one species,Epipactis palustris (L.) Crantz; however, it seems clear thatE. phyllanthes should be included as well, as it is included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora as a vulnerable species (VU) (Table 1) [86], cited only at Liencres (Santander, Cantabria).Table11 shows the species included in the regional catalogue of endangered species of Castilla-La Mancha [107, 108].Table12 shows the species included in the regional catalogue of endangered species in Castilla y León [109]. It is an extensive list, with eighteen species, three of which are included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora:G. odoratissima (DD),D. sulphurea(LC), andN. gabasiana (LC) (Table 1) [86]; however,O. spitzelii is not included and perhaps it should be due to the few populations of this species in this region [22]; this species is included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora as Critically Endangered (CR) (Table 1) [86].Table13 specifies those species included in the regional catalogue of endangered species in Catalonia [110]. Although it is not a very extensive listing, as it includes only a total of nine species, it is the regional catalogue that includes a greater number of species that are included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86], with five species, most of them as Critically Endangered (CR:C. trifida,E. aphyllum, andO. spitzelii) or Endangered (EN:C. calceolus) at the national level, all of them catalogued as in Danger of Extinction according to the RC of Catalonia; onlyG. odoratissima (DD) is not threatened according to the Spanish Red List, classified as Vulnerable according to the RC of Catalonia. Therefore, and considering that it is one of the most recent catalogues, the regional catalogue of Catalonia seems to be very up to date. It should be noted that it is the only regional catalogue to includeO. spitzelii, an endangered species according to the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86], which is also exceptionally present in other autonomous communities such as Castilla y León or Aragón (not confirmed in Aragón).Table14 specifies the species included in the regional catalogue of endangered species of Comunidad Valenciana [111]. This is one of the most recent regional catalogues of endangered species of Spain; evidence of this recentness is its thoroughness, with a total of 41 species included (39 if synonyms are taken into account), although onlyD. insularis is included nationally in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (LC) (Table 1) [86]. This catalogue appears to be updated as it is one of the most recent regional catalogues, and it lists a large number of species.The Regional Catalogue of Extremadura [112] (Table 15) contains two of the species included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86]—D. insularis andS. perez-chiscanoi; in the case of the latter, catalogued for Extremadura as Endangered and however listed nationally as Near Threatened (NT) according to the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86], it seems clear that its status should change regionally to a degree of minor threat. It would be useful to include in this catalogueS. occidentalis,a species highly located in Extremadura, specifically at Campo Lugar, Obanco, and Aljucén (Cáceres). It should be listed as VU according to the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86].In the case of the Regional Catalogue of Galicia [113] (Table 16), with only one species,S. aestivalis (Vu), it should at least includeD. cantabrica, catalogued nationally as VU according to the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86] and cited only at O’Couto (Caurel, Lugo).The Regional Catalogue of La Rioja [113] (Table 17) does not collect any species of the Orchidaceae family; it is recommended to include, at least,E. aphyllum, with one population in Sierra Cebollera and listed nationally as Critically Endangered (CR) according to the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (Table 1) [86].The Regional catalogue of the Comunidad de Madrid is the most ancient of the many catalogues in Spain [115] (Table 18), including only two species—Platanthera bifolia (L.) Rich andNeottia nidus-avis (L.) Rich. The list of possible species to be included is long, with very specific or apparently extinct species in this autonomous community, as evidenced by recent studies [38]. These species includeAceras anthropophorum(L.) W. T. Aiton, Anacamptis pyramidalis(L.) Rich, Barlia robertiana(R. J. Loisel) Greuter, Cephalanthera rubra(L.) Rich,D. insularis,Dactylorhiza sambucina (L.) Soó, G. conopsea, H. hircinum, Limodorum trabutianum Batt., Listera ovata(L.) R. Br. in W.T. Aiton, Neotinea maculata (Desf.) Stearn., Ophrys fuscaLink, Orchis papilionaceaL., Serapias cordigera L. andSpiranthjes spiralis (L.) Chevall.Murcia’s RC [116] (Table 19) seems to be up to date, since it is quite recent, dating from the year 2003, and it includes twelve species.Opposite to Murcia’s RC in terms of timeliness is that of Navarre’s RC [117] (Table 20), which includes only one species,Orchis papilionacea. This catalogue should be reviewed, and it should include at leastE. aphyllum, with one population at the Belagua Valley and that appears in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora as a species in critical Danger of Extinction (CR) (Table 1) [86].


## 3.4. Statistical Analysis

After conducting a joint analysis of the different regional catalogues, the following observations can be made.Table21 refers to the main genera that have been included in regional catalogues of protected species the most, indicating the number of times that each genus has been included in a regional catalogue and the number of species of this genus that have been included in a regional catalogue. The table also specifies the number of species for each genus at the national level following Flora iberica [76].Table 21
Number of species by genus in Spain [76], number of times that they are included in regional catalogues (RC) by genus, and number of species included in regional catalogues (RC) by genus.
Number of spp./genus
Number of times in RC/genus
Number of spp. included in RC/genus
Orchis
21
28
16
Epipactis
14
15
8
Ophrys
12
11
9
Dactylorhiza
9
10
8
Serapias
8
8
6
Spiranthes
2
9
2
Neottia
1
6
1Figure1 represents the genera whose species mostly have been included in the set of 17 regional catalogues. The genera that include large numbers of species and are therefore most likely to be present in many autonomous communities are also those that are included in a larger number of regional catalogues, stressing above all the genusOrchis, with 28 inclusions of different species in the regional catalogues, which precisely shows the greater number of species at the national level (21 species) (Table 21; Figure 1) [76]. In fact, if a correlation is made between the number of species that those genera have at the national level and the number of times that those genera have been included in any regional catalogue (represented by any kind of species that belong to that genus), the correlation is quite high (R2=0.79) (Figure 2).Figure 1
Genera mostly represented in regional catalogues (RC).Figure 2
Relationship of regression between the number of species per genus and the number of regional catalogues (RC) in which each genus is included.At the opposite end, there are the generaNeottia, single grazing (Neottia nidus-avis (L.) Rich), andSpiranthes, with two species (S. aestivalis andS. spiralis), which are included in six and nine regional catalogues, respectively.In a complementary manner, in Figure3 there are the genera with a larger number of species included in the regional catalogues, showing similar results to those in Figure 1 but excludingNeottia andSpiranthes, as they are only represented by one and two species, respectively.Figure 3
Genera with the highest number of species included in the regional catalogues. At the same time, the numbers of species included in regional catalogues and regional red lists are included.For Figure3, the results are more homogenous, and, except forOrchis, which remains standing with 16 species included in various regional catalogues, the other genera are represented through six to nine species in the different regional catalogues. This drop in the number of species is because several species are repeated in several catalogues, but there are really not so many different species, especially in the case ofOrchis andEpipactis, featuring 28 and 15 appointments in different regional catalogues (Figure 1) corresponding to 16 and 8 species, respectively (Figure 3, Table 21). The correlation between the number of species per genus and the number of species that are included in regional catalogue per genus continues to present a high determination coefficient (R2=0.88; figure not shown). Likewise, if the number of times that a genus is included in any regional catalogue is correlated with the number of species of that genus included in regional catalogues, the correlation is quite high (R2=0.92; figure not shown), as expected.Similarly, Figure4 represents the species that are included in the greatest number of regional catalogues, highlightingS. aestivalis andN. nidus-avis, found in seven and six regional catalogues, respectively. None of the six most cited species in regional catalogues (four to seven cites) are included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86], which is indicative of their wide national distribution, although in certain autonomous communities they are scarce; however,S. aestivalis is included in the CNEA [82].Figure 4
Species mostly included in regional catalogues (RC).Table22 constitutes a compendium of the results after analysing the global set of 17 regional catalogues. The table indicates, for each one of these regions, the law by which its regional catalogue was created or its most recent modification (and therefore the year), the number of listed species, and if, based on the results mentioned above, an urgent modification is considered; it also includes the species most urgent to include in each catalogue and its conservation status if it exists, according to the Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86] (Table 1).Table 22
Number of species included in each regional catalogue, indicating in each case the most recent legislation that regulates it, as well as the need of an urgent modification, the minimum species to include in it, and their figure of protection—if it exists—according to the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86] (Table 1).
Regional catalogue
Number of spp.
Needs modification?
Species to include
Andalusia (DEC. 23/2012)
4
YES
Dactylorhiza sulphurea(Link) Franco (LC)Gennaria diphylla(Link) Parl.Gymnadenia conopsea(L.) R. Br. in W.T. Aiton
Aragón (DEC. 185/2005)
4
YES
Epipogium aphyllumSw. (CR)
Asturias (DEC. 65/1995)
0
YES
Undetermined
Balearic Islands (DEC. 75/2005)
6
YES
Orchis robusta(Steph.) Gölz & H.R. Reinhard (CR)
Basque Country (ORD. 3471/1998; ORD. 3901/2003)
7
YES
Barlia robertiana (Lois.) Greuter (CR)Epipactis phyllanthes G.E. Sm. (VU)Orchis cazorlensis LacaitaOrchis papilionaceaL. Ophrys aveyronensis (J.J. Wood) P. Delforge in P. Delforge & D. Tyteca
Canary Islands (LEY 4/2010)
1
YES
Orchis canariensis (VU)
Cantabria (DEC. 120/2008)
1
YES
Epipactis phyllanthes G.E. Sm. (VU)
Castilla-La Mancha
NO
—
(DEC. 33/1998; DEC. 200/2001)
Castilla y León (DEC. 63/2007)
18
YES
Orchis spitzelii Saut ex.W.D.J.Koch (CR)
Catalonia(DEC. 172/2008)
9
NO
—
Com. Valenciana (DEC. 70/2009)
41
NO
—
Extremadura (DEC. 37/2001)
10
YES
Serapias occidentalis C. & P. Venhuis (VU) Serapias perez-chiscanoi Acedo (NT)
Galicia (DEC. 88/2007)
1
YES
Dactylorhiza cantabrica H.A.Peders. (VU)
La Rioja (DEC. 59/1998)
0
YES
Epipogium aphyllum Sw. (CR)
Madrid (DEC. 18/1992)
2
YES
Undetermined
Murcia (DEC. 50/2003)
12
NO
—
Navarre (DEC. F. 94/1997)
1
YES
Epipogium aphyllumSw. (CR)As evident in Table22, there is no clear relationship between how recent each regional catalogue is and the number of protected species included in it (R2=0.1; figure not shown); nevertheless, it is quite obvious for some regional catalogues that seem obsolete, as in the cases of Madrid [115], Asturias [99], Navarre [117], La Rioja [114], and Basque Country [103], with antiquities from 11 to 21 years, with no update since then. These regional catalogues clearly require updating, and they must include some species to protect, as in the case ofE. aphyllum in Aragón, La Rioja, and Navarre, or multiple species that appear necessary to include in the catalogue of Madrid according to De la Torre & Gamarra [38], which in fact is the oldest regional catalogue of Spain; however, there are also quite recent catalogues that need to be updated in a broad way, such as the cases of Andalusia [94], the Canary Islands [105], Cantabria [106], and Galicia [113].However, if the correlation is made between the antiquity of the catalogue and the number of species suggested to include, in this case, an acceptable correlation is obtained (R2=0.38; figure not shown), amounting to R2=0.57 if the curious case of Andalusia mentioned above is not taken into account (figure not shown). Although this regional catalogue dates from 2012, it is suggested to include at least four more species based on the Red List of the Vascular Flora of Andalusia [92]. For this regression, ten species are taken as the number of species to be included in the regional catalogue of Madrid, according to De la Torre and Gamarra [38]; in the case of Asturias, considering that the region has a more recent catalogue, six species have been taken as the number of species to be included in that regional catalogue. These results indicate that there is a direct correlation between the antiquity of the regional catalogue and the number of species to be included.A fact that must be considered when making such correlations is that not all the Spanish regions have the same floristic richness and that, logically, those regions with more variable and more sensitive habitats tend to house vulnerable species and will be more likely to protect a greater number of species. Such is the case of the regions hosting the country’s major mountain ranges, such as regions of Northern Spain and Cantabrian and Pyrenean (Galicia, Asturias, Cantabria, Basque Country, Navarre, and Catalonia) and the mountainous regions of the Centre-North (Castilla y León, Madrid) or South (Andalusia), where on average there are more than 16 genera of orchids, as opposed to other regions with a low diversity of orchids (Murcia, Aragón) [123].


## 4. Conclusions

There are no orchid species whose distribution area includes Spain that are included in the Berne Convention [78], and there are only two species included in the Habitats Directive [77]:C. calceolus, which is the species that is best protected at a legal level, andS. aestivalis.Out of the 96 species of the Spanish orchid flora considered in this review, up to 73 species are included in any catalogue of protection; 16 are in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora (five of them not endangered) [86], and 69 are included in any catalogue of regional protection or regional red list (including 12 of the 16 species included in the aforementioned red list); that is, around 76% of the Spanish orchid flora are listed with any figure of protection or included in any red list, either nationally (about 12–17%) or regionally (72%). Only four out of the sixteen species included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora are not included in any regional catalogue although they should be (Table 1, [86]).The National Catalogue of Threatened Species (CNEA) lists a total of four species:H. metlesicsianum (Endangered) [80, 82],C. calceolus (Endangered) [81, 82], andO. provincialis andS. aestivalis (both as Wild Species in Regime of Special Protection) [82]. It is suggested that, in successive revisions of the CNEA, the other 14 species included in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora should be included—except forC. calceolus (EN) andH. metlesicsianum (EN), which are already included [86] (Table 1). Moreover, it is strongly suggested to include those species listed as Critically Endangered (CR) and Vulnerable (VU) and to a lesser extent the other species listed as Near Threatened (NT) and as Least Concern (LC) and those listed as Data Deficient (DD). In addition, the elaboration of specific plans of recovery for those species listed as Critically Endangered (CR) is suggested.The genera mostly included in regional catalogues and which have a greater number of species in regional catalogues are precisely those genera that have a higher number of species at the national level:Orchis, Epipactis, Ophrys, Dactylorhiza, andSerapias; moreover,Spiranthes andNeottia, despite being bispecific and single grazing, respectively, are within the genera most included in regional catalogues. These latter two genera represent the two species most often included in regional catalogues:S. aestivalis andN. nidus-avis, which appear in seven and six regional catalogues, respectively.Only three out of the seventeen regional catalogues of endangered species do not seem to need an immediate update: the RC of Catalonia [110], the RC of Comunidad Valenciana [111], and the RC of Murcia [116].It is remarkable that the RC of Catalonia [110] is the one that lists the most species that are included in the Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86], a total of five species:C. trifida (CR),E. aphyllum (CR),O. spitzelii (CR),C. calceolus (EN), andG. odoratissima (DD).The other fourteen regional catalogues would need to be modified to a greater or lesser extent, highlighting the RC of Madrid [115], which is the oldest of them all and probably the most obsolete; it is believed that at least ten species would need to be included [38]. The RC of Asturias is also quite old [99] and does not feature any orchid species. The regional catalogues of Andalusia [94] and the Basque Country [102], mainly thanks to the red lists of these two autonomous communities [92, 93], need to be incorporate at least four and five additional species, respectively (Table 22).Several regional catalogues should also be highlighted for their remarkable absences: The RC of Aragón [98] should be modified to includeE. aphyllum (CR) and perhapsO. spitzelii (CR) (its presence not confirmed); the RC of the Balearic Islands [100] should be modified to includeO. robusta (CR), a species endemic to this autonomous community; the RC of the Canary Islands [105] should includeO. canariensis (VU), a species endemic to this autonomous community; the RC of Extremadura [112] should includeS. occidentalis (VU), which is endemic to Extremadura; the RC of Galicia [113] should includeD. cantabrica, endemic to this autonomous community.The main species that are listed in the 2010 Red List of Spanish Vascular Flora [86] and that would need to be included in several regional catalogues are the following:Orchis spitzelli (CR): this species should be included in the regional catalogue of Castilla y León.Epipogium aphyllum (CR): this species should be incorporated into three regional catalogues: Aragón, La Rioja, and Navarre.Epipactis phyllanthes(VU): this species should be included in two regional catalogues: Cantabria and Basque Country.



---

*Source: 7958689-2018-01-30.xml*