# Evaluation of the Efficacy of Acaricides Used to Control the Cattle Tick,Rhipicephalus microplus, in Dairy Herds Raised in the Brazilian Southwestern Amazon

Authors: Luciana G. Brito; Fábio S. Barbieri; Rodrigo B. Rocha; Márcia C. S. Oliveira; Elisana Sales Ribeiro
Journal: Veterinary Medicine International
 (2011)

---

## Abstract

The adult immersion test (AIT) was used to evaluate the efficacy of acaricide molecules used for control ofRhipicephalus microplus on 106 populations collected in five municipalities in the state of Rondônia in the Brazilian South Occidental Amazon region. The analysis of the data showed that the acaricide formulations had different efficacies on the tick populations surveyed. The synthetic pyrethroids (SPs) acaricides were the least effective (48.35–76.84%), followed by SP + organophosphate (OP) associations (68.91–81.47%) and amidine (51.35–100%). For the macrocyclic lactones (MLs), the milbemycin (94.84–100%) was the most effective, followed by spinosad (93.21–100%) and the avermectins (81.34–100%). The phenylpyrazole (PZ) group had similar efficacy (99.90%) to the MLs. Therefore, SP acaricides, including associations with OP, and formulations based on amidine presented low in vitro efficacy to control the R. microplus populations surveyed.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Brazil is the world’s sixth leading producer of milk [1], and dairy farming is an important source of income for small producers as well as of industrial jobs in Brazil and in Rondônia state, a new Brazilian frontier for dairy farming that accounts for 95% of milk production in this region [2].Most dairy herds in the Brazilian Southwestern Amazon are crossbreeds (Bos Taurus × Bos indicus) with varying bloodline degrees. However, the incorporation of crossbreeds with greater percentages of taurine breeds specialized for milk production, such as Holsteins, has made dairy herds more susceptible to infestation by ticks [3]. The climate conditions in the region are propitious for the establishment of cattle ticks due to the predominantly equatorial climate, characterized by average annual rainfall of 2,500 mm and average annual temperature of 24°C, with well-defined wet and dry seasons [4].Besides transmitting diseases,R. microplusimpairs milk production because each female tick is able to ingest 1.0 mL of blood from the host cow during its parasite phase, causing a weight loss of approximately 1 g and reducing milk production by 8.9 mL. In economic terms, these ticks cost farmers around US$ 7.30/head/year when considering the production losses and treatment costs [5–7].Despite the disadvantages of using acaricides, such as environmental contamination, potentially harmful residues in meat and milk, and toxicity to workers who apply them, these drugs are still essential to control tick infestations in the world [8]. However, the intensive use of chemical formulations leads to loss of efficacy of the base molecules because of the development of resistant tick populations.The spread of this resistance reveals the limits on chemical control of this parasite, making it essential to administer these chemicals wisely [6].There are reports in the literature of growing resistance of cattle ticks to chemical molecules in many countries including Brazil, but the status is unknown of pesticide resistance in cattle tick populations in the Southwestern Amazon [6, 9–12].Many dairy farmers in the state of Rondônia have reported the failure of tick control programs in their herds and have requested assistance in choosing more effective pesticides, which was the purpose of the present study.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Characterization of Area and Sites of Collecting the Tick Samples

Between March 2007 and October 2009, engorged female ticks were collected from 106 dairy farms. The herds were formed of crossbreed animals of Holstein (Bos taurus) and dairy Gir (Bos indicus), with bloodline degrees varying from 1/2 to 5/8. The herd size at most of farms ranged from 18 to 42 animals, though one farm had 116 animals.The herds came from dairy farms in the municipalities of Jarú, Ouro Preto do Oeste, Ji-Paraná, Presidente Médici, and Rolim de Moura (Figure1), all located between 10°26' and 11°43' South Latitudes and 62°27' and 61°54' West Longitudes. The predominant climate in the region according to the Köppen classification is a megathermal, with the dry season occurring in winter [13].Figure 1
Location of the municipalities in the state of Rondônia where the populations ofRhipicephalus micropluswere evaluated for efficacy of the acaricides.Dairy farmers responsible for each of the herds evaluated were invited to respond to a questionnaire regarding the use of acaricides, containing questions on the types used, frequency of treatments, and application method.


### 2.2. Collection and Preparation of Ticks

In each farm, up to 250 engorged femaleR. microplus ticks with a length equal to or greater than 4 mm were collected from cows naturally infected, none of which had received tick treatments for at least 30 days. The ticks were placed in identified plastic flasks free of acaricide residues with lids containing small holes, which were transported to the Embrapa Rondônia Animal Health Laboratory within 36 hours of collection for the evaluation of the in  vitro efficacy of acaricides through the adult immersion test (AIT). Only samples in which no oviposition was observed were analyzed.In the laboratory, all females were separated, carefully washed, and then dried on absorbent paper. Engorged females weighing between 160 and 300 mg, with no signs of injury, were used in the tests.


### 2.3. Acaricides

Technical fipronil was provided by Merial and stored at room temperature and was used at a final concentration of 0.0001%. The following commercial acaricides were purchased and stored at 4°C; Triatox ectoparasiticide (12.5% amitraz, Intervet Schering-Plough Animal Health), diluted with distilled water to a final concentration of 0.00006%; Flytick ectoparasiticide (15% cypermethrin, Vallé), at a final concentration of 0.00015%; Alatox ectoparasiticide (5% cypermethrin + 45% dichlorvos, Fort Dodge Animal Health), at final concentrations of 0.00005% and 0.00045%, respectively, Colosso ectoparasiticide (15% cypermethrin + 25% dichlorvos + 1% citronellal, Ouro Fino Animal Health), at final concentrations of 0.00015%, 0.00025%, and 0.00001%, respectively, Butox ectoparasiticide (50% deltamethrin, Intervet Schering-Plough Animal Health), at a final concentration of 0.0005%; Dectomax injectable endectocide for cattle (doramectin 10 mg/mL, Pfizer Animal Health), Ivomec injection for cattle (ivermectin 10 mg/mL, Merial); Baymec injectable endectocide (abamectin 10 mg/mL, Bayer Health Care); Elector ectoparasiticide (2.46% spinosad, Elanco) and Cydectin (moxidectin 10 mg/mL, Fort Dodge Animal Health), all at a final concentration of 0.0001%.


### 2.4. Adult Immersion Tests

The AIT conducted followed the method described by Drummond et al. [14]. Each group of 10 females was immersed for 10 minutes in 30 mL of the acaricide solutions. Commercial formulations of amitraz; cypermethrin; cypermethrin + dichlovos; cypermethrin + dichlovos + citronellal; deltamethrin; spinosad were diluted in distilled water according to the label recommendations.For the evaluation of the avermectins (ivermectin, doramectin, and abamectin) and milbemycin (moxidectin), the females were immersed for 30 minutes in 30 mL of the solutions prepared according to the method proposed by Sabatini et al. [15]. To prepare the 1% fipronil solutions, 625 mg of technical fipronil dissolved in 80 mL of PA acetone was used, diluted in 120 mL of sterile distilled water.All solutions described were kept under constant agitation during the immersion period. Because of the large number of engorged females, only the control was prepared in triplicate, and the field populations were analyzed with two replicates. Each replicate was performed with tenR.  microplus females with weights as homogenous as possible. The females of the control groups were immersed in distilled water for 30 minutes.After immersion in the pesticide solutions or distilled water, all the engorged females were fixed with two-sided adhesive tape in Petridishes (90 mm diameter), which were identified by group, weight, pesticide, and testing date. The Petridishes containing the engorged females were incubated in a climate-controlled chamber at 27 ± 1°C and relative humidity of 85 ± 5%. After the oviposition period (14–18 days), the eggs were weighed and transferred to test tubes (150 mm in height × 15 mm in diameter closed with cotton balls). The identified tubes were placed in the climate-controlled chamber under the same temperature and relative humidity conditions described previously, where they remained until the larvae hatched.The hatching rate of theR.  microplus larvae was based on visual estimation of the percentage of unhatched eggs remaining and of egg shells from which larvae had hatched.The effectiveness of the acaricides was determined by the effect on the estimated reproduction (ER) of the engorged females in a treatment group. The percentage control (% control) of ER afforded by the acaricides was determined by comparing the total ER of all treatment groups with that of the control group according to Drummond et al. [14], calculated with the following formulas.(1)ER=EggweightEngorgedfemaleweight×%hatched×20,000*.*Estimated numbers of eggs in 1 g of Rhipicephalus microplus eggs(2)%control=1-ERofpesticidegroupERofcontrolgroup×100.R. microplus populations presenting a control percentage greater than or equal to 95% to the acaricide were considered susceptible. In vitro efficacy of 95% is the threshold for the approval of an acaricide product in Brazil according to federal regulations [16].


### 2.5. Statistical Analysis

For the interpretation of the results, the acaricide factor was analyzed in order to quantify the effect of the location (municipality) and of a specific acaricide, along with the effect of the interaction of both effects. The model’s estimates were obtained by employing the PROC GLM routine of the Statistical Application System (SAS) (SAS version 8.2; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) considering the arcsine of the square root of the mortality percentages. In the absence of an interaction, multiple comparison between the marginal means of the acaricide factor was carried out using the Tukey-Kramer test, which is adequate for factor analysis with a different number of repetitions. The estimates of the confidence interval of the mean were interpreted as a measure of reliability of using the acaricide bases in the region.


## 2.1. Characterization of Area and Sites of Collecting the Tick Samples

Between March 2007 and October 2009, engorged female ticks were collected from 106 dairy farms. The herds were formed of crossbreed animals of Holstein (Bos taurus) and dairy Gir (Bos indicus), with bloodline degrees varying from 1/2 to 5/8. The herd size at most of farms ranged from 18 to 42 animals, though one farm had 116 animals.The herds came from dairy farms in the municipalities of Jarú, Ouro Preto do Oeste, Ji-Paraná, Presidente Médici, and Rolim de Moura (Figure1), all located between 10°26' and 11°43' South Latitudes and 62°27' and 61°54' West Longitudes. The predominant climate in the region according to the Köppen classification is a megathermal, with the dry season occurring in winter [13].Figure 1
Location of the municipalities in the state of Rondônia where the populations ofRhipicephalus micropluswere evaluated for efficacy of the acaricides.Dairy farmers responsible for each of the herds evaluated were invited to respond to a questionnaire regarding the use of acaricides, containing questions on the types used, frequency of treatments, and application method.


## 2.2. Collection and Preparation of Ticks

In each farm, up to 250 engorged femaleR. microplus ticks with a length equal to or greater than 4 mm were collected from cows naturally infected, none of which had received tick treatments for at least 30 days. The ticks were placed in identified plastic flasks free of acaricide residues with lids containing small holes, which were transported to the Embrapa Rondônia Animal Health Laboratory within 36 hours of collection for the evaluation of the in  vitro efficacy of acaricides through the adult immersion test (AIT). Only samples in which no oviposition was observed were analyzed.In the laboratory, all females were separated, carefully washed, and then dried on absorbent paper. Engorged females weighing between 160 and 300 mg, with no signs of injury, were used in the tests.


## 2.3. Acaricides

Technical fipronil was provided by Merial and stored at room temperature and was used at a final concentration of 0.0001%. The following commercial acaricides were purchased and stored at 4°C; Triatox ectoparasiticide (12.5% amitraz, Intervet Schering-Plough Animal Health), diluted with distilled water to a final concentration of 0.00006%; Flytick ectoparasiticide (15% cypermethrin, Vallé), at a final concentration of 0.00015%; Alatox ectoparasiticide (5% cypermethrin + 45% dichlorvos, Fort Dodge Animal Health), at final concentrations of 0.00005% and 0.00045%, respectively, Colosso ectoparasiticide (15% cypermethrin + 25% dichlorvos + 1% citronellal, Ouro Fino Animal Health), at final concentrations of 0.00015%, 0.00025%, and 0.00001%, respectively, Butox ectoparasiticide (50% deltamethrin, Intervet Schering-Plough Animal Health), at a final concentration of 0.0005%; Dectomax injectable endectocide for cattle (doramectin 10 mg/mL, Pfizer Animal Health), Ivomec injection for cattle (ivermectin 10 mg/mL, Merial); Baymec injectable endectocide (abamectin 10 mg/mL, Bayer Health Care); Elector ectoparasiticide (2.46% spinosad, Elanco) and Cydectin (moxidectin 10 mg/mL, Fort Dodge Animal Health), all at a final concentration of 0.0001%.


## 2.4. Adult Immersion Tests

The AIT conducted followed the method described by Drummond et al. [14]. Each group of 10 females was immersed for 10 minutes in 30 mL of the acaricide solutions. Commercial formulations of amitraz; cypermethrin; cypermethrin + dichlovos; cypermethrin + dichlovos + citronellal; deltamethrin; spinosad were diluted in distilled water according to the label recommendations.For the evaluation of the avermectins (ivermectin, doramectin, and abamectin) and milbemycin (moxidectin), the females were immersed for 30 minutes in 30 mL of the solutions prepared according to the method proposed by Sabatini et al. [15]. To prepare the 1% fipronil solutions, 625 mg of technical fipronil dissolved in 80 mL of PA acetone was used, diluted in 120 mL of sterile distilled water.All solutions described were kept under constant agitation during the immersion period. Because of the large number of engorged females, only the control was prepared in triplicate, and the field populations were analyzed with two replicates. Each replicate was performed with tenR.  microplus females with weights as homogenous as possible. The females of the control groups were immersed in distilled water for 30 minutes.After immersion in the pesticide solutions or distilled water, all the engorged females were fixed with two-sided adhesive tape in Petridishes (90 mm diameter), which were identified by group, weight, pesticide, and testing date. The Petridishes containing the engorged females were incubated in a climate-controlled chamber at 27 ± 1°C and relative humidity of 85 ± 5%. After the oviposition period (14–18 days), the eggs were weighed and transferred to test tubes (150 mm in height × 15 mm in diameter closed with cotton balls). The identified tubes were placed in the climate-controlled chamber under the same temperature and relative humidity conditions described previously, where they remained until the larvae hatched.The hatching rate of theR.  microplus larvae was based on visual estimation of the percentage of unhatched eggs remaining and of egg shells from which larvae had hatched.The effectiveness of the acaricides was determined by the effect on the estimated reproduction (ER) of the engorged females in a treatment group. The percentage control (% control) of ER afforded by the acaricides was determined by comparing the total ER of all treatment groups with that of the control group according to Drummond et al. [14], calculated with the following formulas.(1)ER=EggweightEngorgedfemaleweight×%hatched×20,000*.*Estimated numbers of eggs in 1 g of Rhipicephalus microplus eggs(2)%control=1-ERofpesticidegroupERofcontrolgroup×100.R. microplus populations presenting a control percentage greater than or equal to 95% to the acaricide were considered susceptible. In vitro efficacy of 95% is the threshold for the approval of an acaricide product in Brazil according to federal regulations [16].


## 2.5. Statistical Analysis

For the interpretation of the results, the acaricide factor was analyzed in order to quantify the effect of the location (municipality) and of a specific acaricide, along with the effect of the interaction of both effects. The model’s estimates were obtained by employing the PROC GLM routine of the Statistical Application System (SAS) (SAS version 8.2; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) considering the arcsine of the square root of the mortality percentages. In the absence of an interaction, multiple comparison between the marginal means of the acaricide factor was carried out using the Tukey-Kramer test, which is adequate for factor analysis with a different number of repetitions. The estimates of the confidence interval of the mean were interpreted as a measure of reliability of using the acaricide bases in the region.


## 3. Results

Through the responses of farmers, it could be observed that SP acaricides were used in most of the properties (87.3%). Substitution of acaricide bases did not occur in systematic form in all farms, and when it occurred, the reason given was mainly price and ease of purchase of the acaricides in the local market. The frequency of treatments to control the cattle ticks was weekly in 43.7% of the farms, and the method of acaricide application most often used was spraying on the animals with manual backpack pumps.The mean efficacy of the acaricides and their respective standard deviations againstR. microplus collected from dairy herds in Rondônia are presented in Table 1. Avermectins, milbemycin, PZ,  and spinosin presented the highest mean efficacies according to the AIT.Table 1
Efficacy of different acaricide bases on populations ofRhipicephalus microplus collected from dairy herds in the state of Rondônia, Brazil.
Chemical groupof functionMin. efficacy (%)Max. efficacy (%)Mean efficacy (%  ±SD)Amidin51.3510077.20 ± 15.53Cypermethrin48.3570.561.23 ± 6.83Deltamethrin61.2276.8467.10 ± 4.70Cypermethrin + dichlorvos68.9181.4774.08 ± 4.10Cypermethrin + chlorpyrifos + citronellal72.4186.3778.08 ± 4.10Doramectin86.2110099.74 ± 1.43Ivermectin86.8410097.61 ± 4.29Abamectin81.3410099.65 ± 2.22Milbemycin94.8410099.94 ± 0.51Spinosin93.2110099.96 ± 0.23Phenylpyrazole92.7810099.90 ± 0.74Acaricide formulations containing cypermethrin and deltamethrin presented the lowest efficacy levels observed in the AIT, while the associations of SP + OP and SP + OP + citronellal presented intermediate efficacy in comparison with the other acaricides evaluated. The products based on amidin were more effective than the SP, but with a higher confidence interval. The data obtained suggest that citronellal enhanced the efficacy of the SP + OP association. The macrocyclic lactones (MLs) group, the spinosins, and milbemycin showed high efficacy according to the AIT, as well as the PZ, all with a small confidence interval (Figure2). Ivermectin, abamectin, and doramectin had lost efficacy on some farms, as shown by minimum efficacy values between 81 and 86%.Figure 2
Effectiveness of acaricide bases observed in adult immersion test (AIT) inRhipicephalus microplus populations surveyed in Rondônia state, Brazil. *Means followed by the same letter do not differ according to the Tukey-Kramer test at 1% significance. The bar indicates the 95% minimum efficacy set by Brazilian federal regulations for the marketing of acaricides.The variance analysis showed that the acaricides had variable efficacy, according to theF-test at 1% significance (Table 2). Nonsignificant effects of the location (L) and of the acaricide with location interaction (A × L) indicates that the effectiveness of a specific acaricide did not differ among the municipalities, as the interaction coefficient was low (7.05%).Table 2
Analysis of variance of the effects of the location (L) and of the acaricides (A) on the susceptibility to acaricides in Rhipicephalus microplus populations collected in the state of Rondônia, Brazil.
Source of variationD.F.S.S. (Type III)M.S.FAcaricide (A)1071.25547.1257834.55**Location (L)40.02520.00630.74nsA × L400.33410.00840.98nsCoefficient of variation7.05D.F.: Degrees of freedom; S.S. (Type III): Type III sum of squares; M.S.: Mean square error;F: F-test estimates; **: Significant at 1% probability;   ns: Not significant.


## 4. Discussion

Presently, the Working Group on Parasite Resistance (WGPR-FAO) recommends the  AIT proposed by Drummond et al. [14] for the evaluation of the susceptibility to acaricides in  cattle tick populations, since it is fast, simple and a relatively cheap method for the detection of  acaricide resistance in the field [6]. Despite the high variation of AIT results obtained for SP, OP, amitraz and moxidectin as observed by Jonsson et al. [17], the AIT is a valuable tool for the  rapid and cheap detection of loss of susceptibility to a certain acaricide and should be used with  this specific objective in resistance management programs.According to the analysis of variance, there were no differences of susceptibility to a specific acaricide among the different municipalities, which demonstrates that the acaricides evaluated presented similar efficacy against the differentR. micropluspopulations evaluated.The efficacies of cypermethrin and deltamethrin on theR. micropluspopulations studied varied from 48.33% to 70.5% and 61.22% to 76.84%, respectively. These efficacy levels differ from those found in other regions of Brazil. Pereira [11], in the state of São Paulo, observed  efficacy of 25.39% for deltamethrin and 31.10% for cypermethrin, while Furlong et al. [12], in Minas Gerais, reported averages of 15.3% for deltamethrin and 9.1% for cypermethrin. The differences in efficacy of these acaricies observed between the different Brazilian states can be related to the way they are used, such as inadequate spraying, underdosage or overdosage [18], and/or high frequency of use causing the development of resistant populations [19].The occurrence of synergism in acaricide formulations containing SP and OP was observed by Landim et al. [10]. They investigated tick populations collected in the region of Uberaba (Minas Gerais) and observed that the formulations containing this combination were more effective than formulations containing SP or OP alone. The authors reported that SP and OP used separately had maximum efficacy levels of 43.6% and 46.7%, respectively, while the SP + OP associations showed efficacy between 75.5 and 97.7%. This result was also observed by Furlong et al. [12], who reported a small increase in efficacy of acaricides containing a combination of SP and OP on R. micropluspopulations from the states of Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo. However, in the present study we did not observe any significant increase in efficacy of the SP + OP formulations compared with those containing only SP against tick populations from Rondônia.Furlong et al. [12] also evaluated the efficacy of a formulation containing SP + OP + citronellal, which demonstrated mean efficacy of 74.1%, close to its mean efficacy observed  against cattle tick populations in the present study.The mean efficacy of the acaricide formulations containing SP, SP + OP and SP + OP + citronellal can be considered unsatisfactory for the control ofR. microplusin the surveyed  farms, considering 95% as the minimum efficacy for approval of an acaricide according  Brazilian federal regulations [16].Several Brazilian authors have studied the efficacy of amitraz onR. micropluspopulations using the AIT. The results have shown different susceptibility levels. In the Southeast region, Mendes et al. [9] evaluated ticks from 17 ranches from the state of São Paulo and reported an average efficacy of 77.44%, similar to our results (77.2%). Furlong et al. [12] evaluated the susceptibility to amitraz on 196 R. micropluspopulations from the states of Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo and Goiás and found 47.9%. In the Northeast region, low efficacy of amitraz was reported in the states of Pernambuco (40.5%) by Santana [20] and Bahia (30.95%) by Campos Junior and Oliveira [21]. Nevertheless, in the South region, satisfactory results were obtained in the state of Paraná by Souza et al. [22], where the mean efficacy of amitraz was above 95% for all 17 R. micropluspopulations tested. Camilo et al. [23], evaluating the susceptibility of 20 cattle tick populations in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, observed the presence of resistance or low efficacy in the majority of populations analyzed.The low efficacy observed for SP, OP and amitraz in the studied area can be associated to the development of resistance to these molecules in local populations ofR. microplusin the state of Rondônia. Possibly the inadequate use of these acaricides at the farms studied, such as application of sub-lethal doses, sequential use of the same chemical group for long periods and  short intervals between treatments, has favored the development of resistance [24]. Since 1999 the Rondônia government has had a policy [25] of providing resources to local dairy farmers to encourage them to genetically improve their herds using European breeds (Holstein) as crosses. This initiative has been resulting in significant gains in productivity. However, Bos taurusbreeds incorporated to increase milk production may also have favored infestations of R. microplus. In general, producers tend to reduce the interval between treatments in persistent and heavy tick burdens rather than trying new treatment strategies, thus favoring the development of resistant populations of R. microplus.With respect to the MLs, ivermectin, doramectin and abamectin presented efficacies <95% in some cases. However, these compounds are not recommended for use on lactating cows, since they leave residues in the milk. However, these compounds can be used on other categories of herds to reduce the non-parasitic instars in pastures as part of an integrated management program, as observed by Castro [8].The spinosins are indicated for use on lactating cows and demonstrated excellent efficacy on the tick populations assessed, proving to be a potentially good acaricide to control ticks in the studied area.The PZ group also was highly efficient to control the cattle tick populations evaluated. This efficacy (99.90%) is higher than that reported by Furlong et al. [12] (88.5%) in tests on 723 R. micropluspopulations from various Brazilian states.The analysis of the susceptibility to different acaricides withR. micropluspopulations from dairy farms in the state of Rondônia contributes to the rational and strategic use of acaricides in that area, which is responsible for about 85% of milk production in the Southwestern Amazon. The adequate use of efficient acaricide molecules associated with integrated management practices to control cattle ticks can contribute to the sustainability of dairy farm operations in the region. Such measures are important to delay the development of resistant R. micropluspopulations.



---

*Source: 806093-2011-04-11.xml*