# The Association of Sleep Duration and the Use of Electronic Cigarettes, NHANES, 2015-2016

Authors: R. Constance Wiener; Christopher Waters; Ruchi Bhandari; Alcinda K. Trickett Shockey; Omayma Alshaarawy
Journal: Sleep Disorders
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

Introduction. The unknown effects of electronic cigarettes are public health concerns. One potential effect of electronic cigarette fluid constituents, such as nicotine, may influence sleep. The purpose of this study is to determine if there is an association between sleep duration and electronic cigarette use. Methods. A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2015-2016. Variables of interest included responses to questions concerning electronic cigarette use, hours of sleep, and other variables associated with sleep. Data analyses were conducted with the Rao-Scott chi square test and logistic regression. Results. This study was conducted on 2889 participants, aged 18-65 years, of whom 50.7% were female. Using a bivariate analyses of electronic cigarette usage and sleep duration, participants who never used an electronic cigarette were more likely to have appropriate sleep durations as compared with participants who were currently using electronic cigarettes (P<0.0001). After adjusting for sociodemographic variables and cigarette smoking, current electronic cigarette use was associated with higher odds of less sleep duration (adjusted odds ratio=1.82; 95% CI: 1.18, 2.79; P=0.0075). Conclusions. Participants currently using electronic cigarettes are more likely to have less sleep as compared to participants who have never used electronic cigarettes. Implications. With sleep time duration being a major factor for proper body function and repair, this study can serve as confirmation that the use of electronic cigarettes is not a harmless health behavior.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Inadequate sleep duration is a public health concern. It is associated with higher all-cause mortality with poor sleep duration [1], higher cancer mortality [2], and increased rates of cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and obesity [3]. Researchers have related smoking and tobacco use disorder to several sleep disturbances, including poor sleep efficiency, sleep onset latency, number of awakenings [4–6], sleep bruxism, restless leg syndrome [7], and sleep-disordered breathing [8, 9].The association of sleep and smoking is not fully understood. A nicotine pathway has been postulated as one potential mechanism. It is theorized that the nicotine in tobacco products activates the sympathoadrenal system thereby increasing heart rate, blood pressure, and glucose levels [10]. The activation has a potential to delay or interfere with sleep.Researchers showed such an effect in preclinical studies where nicotine administration reduced total sleep time duration due to its stimulatory actions [11]. Additionally, researchers found polysomnographic indications of longer sleep onset latency, less total sleep time duration, decreased sleep continuity, and increased wake time among current smokers [9, 12]. Other sleep impairments and insomnia have been noted and associated with the removal of nicotine and its effects during tobacco cessation [12].Conversely, there are mixed results of sleep disorders and tobacco use in some studies. In a cross-sectional study of young adults, researchers found that sleep quality, sleep time duration, and sleep onset latency were similar among smokers and nonsmokers [13]. In another study, there was no significant correlation of smoking status with apnea hypopnea index, sleep onset latency, and several other measures of sleep quality [14]. When the sample was stratified by age, total sleep time and sleep efficiency were higher and statistically significant in the smoker/former smoker group.There are few similar studies in which researchers have examined electronic cigarette use and sleep duration. Electronic cigarette devices create an aerosol from a fluid (e-liquid). The e-liquid components can vary immensely. Commercial e-liquids often consist of vegetable glycerin, propylene glycol, proprietary flavorings, and nicotine [15]. The liquids are heated resulting in the formation of an aerosol and are directly inhaled [15]. There were 466 brands and 7764 different flavors of electronic cigarettes identified online from May-August 2012 to December 2013-January 2014 [16]. Many electronic cigarette e-liquids have not been tested. E-liquid fruit flavors, for example, typically contain diacetyl, which has been linked to bronchiolitis obliterans, an irreversible respiratory disease [17]. Some strawberry flavored e-liquids were found to be cytotoxic [17]. There is a concern that vitamins in some e-liquids may cause pulmonary damage [17].The use of electronic cigarettes has been increasing. Nearly one-fifth (21.6%) of adults, aged 18-24 years, tried electronic cigarettes in 2014 [18]. Approximately 59% of individuals were dual users, reporting both electronic cigarette use and cigarette use [19]. Among high school students, electronic cigarette use increased from 11.7% in 2007 to 20.8% in 2018 [20]. It is important to understand the effect of these products on health.Currently, there are very few studies on sleep duration and electronic cigarettes, and of the studies, controversy remains as to if an association exists. Researchers recently concluded that dual use of electronic cigarettes with conventional tobacco is associated with decreased sleep quality in women [21]. Other researchers who examined sleep data on 2488 California adolescents found no significant difference in weekday sleep time duration between adolescents who used electronic cigarettes at a higher frequency and lower frequency, although adolescents who used electronic cigarettes slept significantly less on weekends compared with adolescents who did not use electronic cigarettes [22].It is known that many factors affect sleep duration. In the Unifying Energy Allocation Model of Sleep (the theoretical basis for this study), there are functions that generally occur in wakefulness (including, vigilance, foraging, and reproduction) that are downregulated during sleep; and there are functions that generally occur during sleep (including growth, cellular housekeeping, repair, immune function, and neural network reorganization) and are downregulated during wakefulness [23]. The predominant functions and wake/sleep cycle are altered by drugs/products, alcohol, infection, activity, anxiety/stress, chronic disease, and other factors. In this study, we examined if electronic cigarettes are among the drugs/products that alter sleep duration. However, as this study has a cross-sectional study design, causality cannot be determined. Therefore, questions about the association of electronic cigarette use and sleep remain unanswered. The purpose of this study is to determine the association of electronic cigarette use and sleep time duration among adults covering a wide range of ages (18-65 years). Data are retrieved from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2015-2016.


## 2. Methods

This study received West Virginia University Institutional Review Board acknowledgement of nonhuman subject research (Protocol number 1907635442). Data used in this study were accessed from the NHANES, 2015-2016, available online athttps://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/ContinuousNhanes/Default.aspx?BeginYear=2015 [24]. The NHANES is a program which began in the 1960s to determine population health based upon approximately 5000 noninstitutionalized U.S. residents. NHANES participants respond to questions concerning demographics, diet, socioeconomic status, and health status. They also undergo dental and medical examinations, laboratory tests, and physiological measurement. The NHANES uses a complex study design to allow for the generalization of findings. Weights and sampling adjustments are provided in the data sets.The data used in this study were from the Questionnaire Data files of NHANES. The question used for the sleep variable was “How much sleep do you usually get at night on weekdays or workdays?” [24]. The participants’ sleep duration responses, in hours, were categorized into “not recommended for their age” and “may be appropriate for their age,” based on the National Sleep Foundation sleep times. For individuals aged 18-25 years, a not recommended sleep duration is <6 hours and >11 hours; for individuals aged 26-64 years, a not recommended sleep duration is <6 hours and >10 hours; and for individuals≥65years, a not recommended sleep duration is <6 hours and >9 hours [25]. Therefore, “may be appropriate” sleep durations in this study were 6 to 11 hours for individuals aged 18-25 years, 6 to 10 for individuals aged 26-64 years, and 5-9 hours for individuals≥65years. The National Sleep Foundation indicates 6 hours to 10 or 11 hours for individuals aged 18-25 years and 5 or 6 hours to 9 hours for individuals aged ≥65 years in the “may be appropriate” sleep duration category (which slightly overlaps the “not recommended” category) [25].In NHANES, electronic cigarette use questions were asked in the participant’s residence by calibrated interviewers using the Computer-Assisted Personal Interview system. The questions used for the electronic cigarette variable were “Have you ever used an electronic cigarette even one time?” and “During the past 30 days, on how many days did you use electronic cigarettes?” [24]. A negative response to the first question was used to define the participant as a person who never used electronic cigarettes. A positive response to the first question and a response of not having used an electronic cigarette during the past 30 days were used to define the participant as a person who formerly used electronic cigarettes. A positive response to the first question and a response of having used an electronic cigarette within the previous 30 days were used to define the participant as a person who currently uses electronic cigarettes. The authors recognize the complexity of evaluating electronic cigarette use. Whereas never cigarette smoking is generally recognized as fewer than 100 lifetime cigarettes and current cigarette smoking is currently smoking some or every day, similar definitions are not standard for electronic cigarette use [26–28].In order to more fully describe the sample, electronic cigarette use was further subgrouped by frequency of use over the past 30 days: (1) daily use, (2) intermediate use for more than 5 days to fewer than 30 days, and (3) infrequent use of 1 day to 5 days. Also, to more fully describe the sample, a dual use category was created: (1) current dual use (use of cigarettesand electronic cigarettes over the previous 30 days); (2) never dual use (any smoking category (current, former, never) and never electronic cigarette use or any electronic cigarette use category (current, former, never) and never cigarette use); and (3) former dual use (smoked >100 lifetime cigarettes but not having used cigarettes over the past 30 days and used electronic cigarettes but not having used them over the past 30 days).Based on previous research and the Unifying Energy Allocation Model of Sleep, the following variables were associated with both electronic cigarette use and sleep duration and were included in the study: sex (male, female); age (18-25 years, 26-44 years, 45-65 years); race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Mexican American, other); education (high school or less, more than high school); federal poverty level (≤200%, >200%); health insurance (yes, no); cigarette smoking (current, former, never); body mass index (underweight/normal, overweight/obese); alcohol use (no, moderate, heavy, missing); presence of chronic disease defined as arthritis, cardiovascular disease, depression, emphysema, or diabetes (yes, no); and report of daytime sleepiness (0-1/month, 2-4/month, ≥5/month), a measure of sleep quality (Figure1).Figure 1
Study sample.Variables were analyzed for frequency and weighted percentages, presented by current, former, and never electronic cigarette use. Chi-square test was conducted to identify bivariate associations between sleep duration categories (not having recommended sleep duration for their age and may be appropriate sleep duration for their age). The analyses were adjusted for strata, design, and sample weights accounting for the complex sampling design. The key concepts for adequate sample sizes when using NHANES data are that the relative standard error should be less than 30% (standard of the estimate error divided by the value of the estimate) and that the degrees of freedom are calculated by the number of primary sampling units (clusters) minus the number of strata. These criteria limited the number of variables that could be considered in the analyses. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the strength of association of electronic cigarette use and sleep duration. Data analyses were conducted with SAS® version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). The significance level was set, a priori, atP<0.05.


## 3. Results

The sample description is presented in Table1. There were 2889 participants, of whom 50.7% were female. There were 18.0% who were aged 18-25 years, 40.0% who were 26-44 years, and 42.1% who were 45-65 years. Most of the participants were non-Hispanic white (60.0%), overweight/obese (60.0%), had no chronic diseases (69.6%), and were >200% of the federal poverty level. There were 21.7% current smokers. Approximately 7.1% of the sample reported currently using electronic cigarettes. Of those participants, 1.5% used electronic cigarettes daily, 1.6% used them intermittently, and 4.0% used them infrequently. About 4.6% of participants had dual electronic cigarette and combustible cigarette use.Table 1
Sample characteristics, NHANES 2015-2016,n=2889.
Number
Weighted percentage
Electronic cigarette use1
Current
191
7.1
Daily use
38
1.5
Intermediate use
35
1.6
Infrequent use
118
4.0
Former
457
17.9
Never
2241
75.0
Cigarette use
Current use
626
21.7
Former use
480
19.5
Never use
1783
58.8
Dual use2
Current
116
4.6
Former
94
4.2
Never
2679
91.2
Sex
Female
1496
50.7
Male
1393
49.3
Age in years
18-25
563
18.0
26-44
1140
40.0
45-65
1186
42.1
Race/ethnicity
Non-Hispanic white
832
60.0
Non-Hispanic black
669
12.7
Mexican American
904
17.3
Other
484
10.1
Education
High school/less
1383
37.6
More than HS
1506
62.4
Federal poverty level
≤200%
1525
39.7
>200%
1364
60.3
Health insurance
Yes
2233
82.6
No
656
17.4
Body mass index
Under/normal
1149
40.0
Over/obese
707
60.0
Alcohol use
No
848
22.7
Moderate
870
36.5
Heavy
720
27.2
Missing
451
13.6
Chronic disease2
Yes
919
30.4
No
1970
69.6
Sleepiness
0-1/month
1197
37.7
2-4/month
930
34.2
≥5/month
762
28.1
Snoring
0-2/week
1527
58.3
3-4/week
483
16.4
5 or more times/week
716
25.3
Snorting
0-2/week
2439
89.1
3-4/week
159
5.6
5 or more times/week
142
5.3
Sleep duration for specific age3
May be appropriate
2505
89.8
Not recommended
384
10.2
Abbreviations: wt%: weighted column percent; HS: high school.1Current use = daily use over the past 30 days; intermediate use = use > 5 days to ≤29 days; infrequent use = ≥1 day to ≤5 days. 2Dual use current = smoking cigarettes and using electronic cigarettes over the previous 30 days; former dual use = reporting having smoked >100 lifetime cigarettes and having ever used electronic cigarettes; never = reporting never having smoked >100 cigarettes and reporting never having tried electronic cigarettes. 3Chronic disease = positive response to having arthritis, cardiovascular disease, depression, emphysema, or diabetes. 4Based upon National Sleep Foundation (https://www.sleepfoundation.org/press-releasenational-sleep-foundation-recommends-new-sleep-times).Bivariate relationships of electronic cigarette use with the variables of interest are presented in Table2. Significant relationships with electronic cigarettes were with less sleep duration, older age, less education, lower federal poverty level, lack of health insurance, concurrent cigarette smoking, alcohol use, chronic diseases, snorting, and daytime sleepiness.Table 2
Bivariate analysis of electronic cigarette use with sample variables, NHANES 2015-2016,n=2889.
Current electronic cigarette use
Former electronic cigarette use
Never electronic cigarette use
P value
Number
Weighted percentage
Number
Weighted percentage
Number
Weighted percentage
Electronic cigarette use
191
7.1
457
17.9
2241
75.0
Cigarette use
<0.0001
Current use
116
64.9
254
55.6
256
9.5
Former use
36
20.4
94
23.2
350
18.5
Never use
39
14.7
109
21.2
1635
72.0
Sex
0.0084
Female
76
39.4
218
51.1
1202
51.7
Male
115
60.6
239
48.9
1039
48.3
Age in years
<0.0001
18-25
60
28.3
128
27.0
375
14.8
26-44
80
42.9
186
40.4
874
39.5
45-65
51
28.9
143
32.6
992
45.7
Race/ethnicity
0.0604
Non-Hispanic white
77
63.1
186
66.1
569
58.1
Non-Hispanic black
38
9.6
105
12.1
526
13.2
Mexican American
52
15.4
106
13.0
746
18.4
Other
24
11.9
60
8.7
400
10.3
Education
<0.0001
High school/less
113
57.4
223
40.2
1047
35.1
More than high school
78
42.6
234
59.8
1194
64.9
Federal poverty level
0.0002
≤200%
114
53.2
270
48.1
1141
36.4
>200%
77
46.8
187
51.9
1100
63.6
Health insurance
<0.0001
Yes
137
76.3
332
76.8
1764
84.6
No
54
23.7
125
23.2
477
15.4
Body mass index
0.7431
Under/normal
69
36.7
187
41.8
849
39.9
Over/obese
121
63.3
267
58.2
1319
60.1
Alcohol use
<0.0001
No
24
8.8
55
9.7
769
27.1
Moderate
58
30.3
146
31.9
666
38.2
Heavy
80
46.3
191
44.6
449
21.3
Missing
29
14.6
65
13.8
357
13.5
Chronic disease1
0.0053
Yes
76
42.0
164
35.1
679
28.2
No
115
58.0
293
64.9
1562
71.8
Sleepiness
<0.0001
0-1/month
46
20.6
133
30.0
1018
41.2
2-4/month
65
31.9
159
35.2
706
34.2
≥5/month
80
47.6
165
34.8
517
24.6
Snoring
0.4828
0-2/week
105
59.5
220
52.1
1202
59.7
3-4/week
29
15.2
79
18.4
375
16.0
5 or more times/week
48
25.3
128
29.5
540
24.3
Snorting
0.0034
0-2/week
151
84.2
372
85.3
1916
90.5
3-4/week
18
11.0
24
5.7
117
5.0
5 or more times/week
13
4.8
39
9.0
90
4.5
Sleep duration for specific age2
<0.0001
Not recommended
41
19.9
67
9.9
276
9.4
May be appropriate
150
80.1
390
90.1
1965
90.6
Abbreviations: wt%: weighted column percent; HS: high school.P values indicate Rao-Scott chi-square test Pr>ChiSq for current/former/never electronic cigarette use. 1Chronic disease = positive response to having arthritis, cardiovascular disease, depression, emphysema, or diabetes. 2Based upon National Sleep Foundation (https://www.sleepfoundation.org/press-releasenational-sleep-foundation-recommends-new-sleep-times).Bivariate relationships of sleep duration with the variables of interest are presented in Table3. Sleep duration was associated with age, race, education, federal poverty level, health insurance, cigarette use, alcohol use, chronic disease, daytime sleepiness, dual use, and electronic cigarette use.Table 3
Bivariate analysis of sleep duration with sample variables, NHANES, 2015-2016,n=2889.
Not recommended sleep duration for specific age1
May be appropriate sleep duration for specific age1
P value
Number
Weighted percent
Number
Weighted percent
Electronic cigarette use
<0.0001
Current
41
13.9
150
6.3
Former
67
17.3
390
18.0
Never
276
68.8
1965
75.7
Cigarette use
<0.0001
Current use
132
35.5
494
20.1
Former use
56
16.5
424
19.8
Never use
196
48.0
1587
60.0
Dual use3
<0.0001
Current
Cell size suppressed4
10.8
87
3.9
Former
Cell size suppressed
2.8
85
4.3
Never
Cell size suppressed
86.4
2333
91.8
Sex
0.3620
Female
196
48.7
1300
51.0
Male
188
51.4
1205
49.0
Age in years
0.0009
18-25
48
11.0
515
18.7
26-44
152
41.3
988
39.7
45-65
184
47.7
1002
41.5
Race/ethnicity
<0.0001
Non-Hispanic white
82
45.2
750
61.6
Non-Hispanic black
138
25.7
531
11.3
Mexican American
114
19.7
790
17.0
Other
50
9.4
434
10.2
Education
<0.0001
High school/less
225
57.8
1158
35.3
More than high school
159
42.2
1347
64.7
Federal poverty level
<0.0001
≤200%
251
61.1
1274
37.2
>200%
133
38.9
1231
62.8
Health insurance
0.0328
Yes
286
78.4
1946
83.1
No
98
21.6
558
16.9
Body mass index
0.0910
Under/normal
167
44.2
982
39.6
Over/obese
209
55.8
1498
60.4
Alcohol use
<0.0001
No
116
26.9
732
22.2
Moderate
90
23.5
780
38.0
Heavy
111
33.9
609
26.5
Missing
67
15.7
384
13.4
Chronic disease1, 2
<0.0001
Yes
176
46.8
743
28.5
No
208
53.2
1762
71.5
Sleepiness
<0.0001
0-1/month
122
25.8
1075
39.1
2-4/month
116
33.9
814
34.2
≥5/month
146
40.3
616
26.7
Abbreviations: wt: weighted; HS: high school.1Based upon National Sleep Foundation (https://www.sleepfoundation.org/press-releasenational-sleep-foundation-recommends-new-sleep-times). 2Chronic disease = positive response to having arthritis, cardiovascular disease, depression, emphysema, or diabetes. 3Dual use current = smoking cigarettes and using electronic cigarettes over the previous 30 days; former dual use = reporting having smoked >100 lifetime cigarettes and having ever used electronic cigarettes; never = reporting never having smoked >100 cigarettes and reporting never having tried electronic cigarettes. 4Numerical entries into the cell categories are suppressed for participant confidentiality.Logistic regression analyses on not having recommended sleep duration for age are presented in Table4. In the unadjusted logistic regression, participants who reported currently using electronic cigarettes as compared with participants who never used electronic cigarettes had an unadjusted odds ratio of 2.41 (95% CI: 1.66, 3.50; P=0.0010). Participants who formerly used electronic cigarettes had an unadjusted odds ratio of 1.06 (95% CI: 0.73, 1.53; P=0.0861). There was an insufficient sample size to conduct an interaction of participants’ electronic cigarette use and cigarette use (3 electronic cigarette use categories × 3 smoking categories).Table 4
Logistic regression of electronic cigarette use on not recommended sleep duration for specific age1, NHANES 2015-2016, n=2889.
Unadjusted
Model 1
Model 2
Unadjusted odds ratio
95% CI
P value
Adjusted odds ratio
95% CI
P value
Adjusted odds ratio
95% CI
P value
Electronic cigarette use
Current use
2.41
1.66, 3.50
0.0010
2.41
1.52, 3.82
0.0042
1.82
1.18, 2.79
0.0075
Former use
1.06
0.73, 1.53
0.0861
1.09
0.76, 1.57
0.1291
0.85
0.59, 1.24
0.513
Never use
1.00∗
1.00
1.00
Sex
Male
1.11
0.93, 1.34
0.2387
1.13
0.91, 1.40
0.2750
Female
1.00
1.00
Race/ethnicity
NHB
2.69
1.93, 3.74
<0.0001
2.67
2.01, 3.57
<0.0001
Mexican American
1.19
0.75, 1.88
0.2862
1.23
0.83, 1.82
0.3074
Other
1.16
0.73, 1.84
0.2687
1.21
0.80, 1.85
0.3480
NHW
1.00
1.00
Age in years
26-44
2.24
1.36, 3.69
0.0687
2.08
1.36, 3.20
0.0102
45-65
2.82
1.81, 4.42
<0.0001
2.20
1.43, 3.37
0.0014
18-25
1.00
1.00
Education
High school or less
1.93
1.39, 2.68
0.0007
1.72
1.29, 2.30
0.0003
More than high school
1.00
1.00
Insurance
No
0.83
0.59, 1.18
0.2814
0.83
0.61, 1.11
0.2004
Yes
1.00
1.00
Federal poverty level
≤200%
2.19
1.39, 3.43
0.0021
1.94
1.25, 3.02
0.0032
>200%
1.00
1.00
Yes
1.67
1.27, 2.19
0.0002
No
1.00
Alcohol use
Heavy use
1.68
1.14, 2.46
0.1564
No
1.68
1.09, 2.60
0.2090
Moderate
1.00
Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval; NHB: non-Hispanic black; NHW: non-Hispanic white.∗Reference groups are identified as having an odds ratio of 1.00. 1Based upon National Sleep Foundation (https://www.sleepfoundation.org/press-releasenational-sleep-foundation-recommends-new-sleep-times). 2Chronic disease = positive response to having arthritis, cardiovascular disease, depression, emphysema, or diabetes. Model 1 is adjusted for sex, race/ethnicity, age, education, insurance status, and federal poverty level. Model 2 is adjusted for sex, race/ethnicity, age, education, insurance status, federal poverty level, smoking status, chronic disease status, and alcohol use. A missing indicator was created for alcohol use (result not presented for missing category).In a logistic regression model adjusted with demographic variables (sex, age, race/ethnicity, education, federal poverty level, and insurance), the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for participants who reported currently using electronic cigarettes as compared with participants who never used electronic cigarettes was 2.41 (95% CI: 1.66, 3.50;P=0.0010). Participants who formerly used electronic cigarettes had an adjusted odds ratio of 1.09 (95% CI: 0.76, 1.57; P=0.1291).In a second model with the addition of smoking, chronic diseases, and alcohol use, the AOR for participants who reported currently using electronic cigarettes as compared with participants who never used electronic cigarettes was 1.82 (95% CI: 1.18, 2.79;P=0.0075). Participants who formerly used electronic cigarettes had an adjusted odds ratio of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.59, 1.24; P=0.0513).Sample size limitations precluded further analyses based upon frequency of electronic cigarette subgroup categories of intermediate use, infrequent use, current use, and never use. For dual use logistic regression analyses (presented in Table5), current dual use was associated with not having recommended sleep duration in the unadjusted (OR = 2.95 (95% CI: 1.90, 4.50; P=0.0006)) and both of the adjusted models (AOR=2.80 (95% CI: 1.68, 4.67; P=0.0041) and AOR=2.62 (95% CI: 1.65, 4.16; P=0.0010), respectively).Table 5
Logistic regression of dual use1 on not recommended sleep duration for specific age2, NHANES 2015-2016, n=2889.
Unadjusted
Model 1
Model 2
Unadjusted odds ratio
95% CI
P value
Adjusted odds ratio
95% CI
P value
Adjusted odds ratio
95% CI
P value
Dual use
Current use
2.95
1.90, 4.58
0.0006
2.80
1.68, 4.67
0.0041
2.62
1.65, 4.16
0.0010
Former use
0.70
0.29, 1.69
0.0525
0.86
0.37, 2.02
0.1415
0.86
0.37, 1.97
0.1492
Never use
1.00∗
1.00
1.00
Sex
Male
1.12
0.93, 1.36
0.2229
1.14
0.92, 1.41
0.2279
Female
1.00
1.00
Race/ethnicity
NHB
2.68
1.91, 3.76
<0.0001
2.71
2.02, 3.63
<0.0001
Mexican American
1.18
0.74, 1.88
0.2881
1.20
0.80, 1.82
0.2610
Other
1.15
0.71, 1.86
0.2687
1.20
0.77, 1.87
0.3334
NHW
1.00
1.00
Age in years
26-44
2.16
1.32, 3.54
0.0698
2.10
1.36, 3.24
0.0090
45-65
2.66
1.72, 4.11
<0.0001
2.19
1.42, 3.38
0.0016
18-25
1.00
1.00
Education
High school or less
1.94
1.40, 2.70
0.0007
1.78
1.32, 2.40
0.0002
More than high school
1.00
1.00
Insurance
No
0.84
0.58, 1.20
0.3038
0.84
0.61, 1.15
0.2805
Yes
1.00
1.00
Federal poverty level
≤200%
2.18
1.38, 3.44
0.0024
2.00
1.31, 3.06
0.0013
>200%
1.00
1.00
Chronic disease3
Yes
1.73
1.32, 2.26
<0.0001
No
1.00
Alcohol use
Heavy use
1.76
1.19, 2.59
0.0803
No
1.63
1.07, 2.49
0.2596
Moderate
1.00
Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval; NHB: non-Hispanic black; NHW: non-Hispanic white.∗Reference groups are identified as having an odds ratio of 1.00. 1Dual use categories: current dual use = use of cigarettes and electronic cigarettes over the previous 30 days; never dual use = any smoking category (current, former, never) and never electronic cigarette use or any electronic cigarette use category (current, former, never) and never cigarette use; former dual = having smoked >100 lifetime cigarettes but not having used cigarettes over the past 30 days and having used electronic cigarettes but not having used them over the past 30 days. 2Based upon National Sleep Foundation (https://www.sleepfoundation.org/press-releasenational-sleep-foundation-recommends-new-sleep-times). 3Chronic disease = positive response to having arthritis, cardiovascular disease, depression, emphysema, or diabetes. Model 1 is adjusted for sex, race/ethnicity, age, education, insurance status, and federal poverty level. Model 2 is adjusted for sex, race/ethnicity, age, education, insurance status, federal poverty level, chronic disease status, and alcohol use. A missing indicator was created for alcohol use (result not presented for missing category).Although not a focus of this study, other factors associated with sleep were also examined. Electronic cigarette use was not associated with snoring (P=0.4828) in bivariate analysis; however, it was associated with snorting (P=0.0034) and daytime sleepiness (P<0.0001). Further analyses with logistic regression failed to reach significance for snorting (ORe‐cigaretteuse=0.58 (95% CI: 0.31, 1.07; P=0.3200); AORe‐cigaretteuse=0.60 (0.31, 1.15; P=0.3822); ORformeruse=0.60 (95% CI: 0.40, 0.89; P=0.2649); AORformeruse=0.60 (0.35, 1.02; P=0.3135)).In unadjusted logistic regression, e-cigarette use was more likely to be associated with daytime sleepiness (OR=0.36 (0.26, 0.52; P=0.0008)) and former e-cigarette use was not (P=0.9219). Further adjusted analyses were not reliable due to the lack of degrees of freedom in computing the results; however, with degrees of freedom set at infinity, daytime sleepiness failed to reach significance (P=0.3845). These results are not presented in a tabular format.


## 4. Discussion

In this study, the researchers report that participants who currently use electronic cigarettes were more likely to have less sleep as compared with participants who never used electronic cigarettes. After adjusting for sociodemographic variables and variables from the Unifying Energy Allocation Model of Sleep, current electronic cigarette use remained associated with higher odds of less sleep duration. As mentioned earlier, the wake-sleep predominant functions are altered by many factors. Our results suggest that electronic cigarette smoking is one such factors; however, as a cross-sectional study, causality cannot be definitively determined by this study: it is possible that electronic cigarette use does impact sleep duration, and it is also possible that when there is reduced sleep duration, there is a greater likelihood of using electronic cigarettes.In an online search for electronic cigarette use and harm, the first thirty results indicated warnings of dangers associated with electronic cigarettes; further searches described electronic cigarettes as less harmful than smoking, as having a role in tobacco harm reduction. News reports of 2561 hospitalizations and 55 deaths due to lung injuries from electronic cigarettes [29] have increased awareness of the potential dangers of electronic cigarettes.In support of the potential causal effect, many e-fluids contain stimulants (such as nicotine) that are known to impact sleep. However, there are several electronic cigarette fluids that do not have nicotine in the e-fluids. An alternate possible mechanism for causality is through the link that researchers found between e-liquids with vitamin E acetate and adverse respiratory outcomes. Coughing, airway irritation, and chest pain were associated with electronic cigarette use [29, 30], and such factors may interrupt sleep duration. Although vitamin E acetate seems to be a significant airway irritant, there are many different substances and product sources that are yet to be investigated [29].Data are scant on electronic cigarette use behavior. Therefore, novel approaches for research on electronic cigarette use behavior are needed. For example, researchers are using genetic analyses to examine tobacco use and other substance use behavior [31]. In a study using Mendelian randomization to calculate genetic correlations and causal effects, researchers found novel genetic correlations between smoking (initiation and cigarettes per day) and reduced sleep behavior [32]. Since the development of the genome-wide association study and the Sequencing Consortium of Alcohol and Nicotine Use, hundreds of novel loci, specifically 564 independent genetic variants assigned to 405 genes, have been discovered to be associated with smoking and drinking behaviors [32]. Genetic analyses between electronic cigarette use and behavioral outcomes may provide similar information concerning genes associated with electronic cigarette use behavior. Unhealthy substance use behavior among adolescents, including tobacco use behavior, declined over the last decade. However, in 2017, approximately 3.6 million U.S. middle school and high school students were using some form of tobacco, selecting electronic vapor products as the most popular product [33]. It is imperative to understand the mechanisms leading to electronic cigarette use.


### 4.1. Strengths and Limitations

The strengths of this study include the national representative sample, the standardized data collection approach, and the ability to adjust for many variables. Though this study has many strengths, there are also certain limitations. NHANES data are observational, and causal inferences cannot be drawn between sleep duration and electronic cigarette use.The data for sleep duration and electronic cigarette use were self-reported and not objectively measured. The data may be subjected to recall bias. Although sleep can be measured on several parameters, such as sleep time duration, sleep efficiency, sleep onset latency, and the number of awakenings, the researchers considered only sleep time duration in this study. It is possible that the use of a single measure may not fully capture the clinical construct of sleep quality.Electronic cigarette use was defined as current use (using electronic cigarettes within the previous 30 days), former use (ever having used electronic cigarettes), and never use. This is the conventional method of describing cigarette use; however, the patterns of electronic cigarette use are different from cigarette use and are not standardized for research. Electronic cigarette use is complex and often involves dual use [26–28]. The synergistic effect of electronic cigarettes and conventional tobacco use (dual use) can be much greater than using only one inhalant [34]. The authors provided additional analyses on dual use to address this limitation.


## 4.1. Strengths and Limitations

The strengths of this study include the national representative sample, the standardized data collection approach, and the ability to adjust for many variables. Though this study has many strengths, there are also certain limitations. NHANES data are observational, and causal inferences cannot be drawn between sleep duration and electronic cigarette use.The data for sleep duration and electronic cigarette use were self-reported and not objectively measured. The data may be subjected to recall bias. Although sleep can be measured on several parameters, such as sleep time duration, sleep efficiency, sleep onset latency, and the number of awakenings, the researchers considered only sleep time duration in this study. It is possible that the use of a single measure may not fully capture the clinical construct of sleep quality.Electronic cigarette use was defined as current use (using electronic cigarettes within the previous 30 days), former use (ever having used electronic cigarettes), and never use. This is the conventional method of describing cigarette use; however, the patterns of electronic cigarette use are different from cigarette use and are not standardized for research. Electronic cigarette use is complex and often involves dual use [26–28]. The synergistic effect of electronic cigarettes and conventional tobacco use (dual use) can be much greater than using only one inhalant [34]. The authors provided additional analyses on dual use to address this limitation.


## 5. Conclusion

Participants who currently use electronic cigarettes were 1.82 times more likely not to get their recommended sleep time duration as compared with participants who never used electronic cigarettes. With sleep time duration being a major factor for proper body function and repair, this study can serve as confirmation that the use of electronic cigarettes is not a harmless health behavior.



---

*Source: 8010923-2020-03-03.xml*