# Investigating Equations Used to Design a Very Small Normal-Mode Helical Antenna in Free Space

Authors: Dang Tien Dung; Quoc Dinh Nguyen; Do Quoc Trinh; Yoshihide Yamada
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

A normal-mode helical antenna (NMHA) has been applied in some small devices such as tire pressure monitoring systems (TPMS) and radio frequency identification (RFID) tags. Previously, electrical characteristics of NMHA were obtained through electromagnetic simulations. In practical design of NMHA, equational expressions for the main electrical characteristics are more convenient. Electrical performances of NMHA can be expressed by a combination of a short dipole and small loops. Applicability of equations for a short dipole and a small loop to very small normal-mode helical antennas such as antennas around 1/100 wavelengths was not clear. In this paper, accuracies of equations for input resistances, antenna efficiency, and axial ratios are verified by comparisons with electromagnetic simulation results by FEKO software at 402 MHz. In addition, the structure of the antenna equal to 0.021λ is fabricated, and measurements are performed to confirm the design accuracy.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

A compact antenna has been used in some small devices such as tire pressure monitoring systems (TPMS), radio frequency identification (RFID), and some radio devices that require very small sizes [1]. A very small normal-mode helical antenna (NMHA) is the one having good performances with small size. NMHA is equivalent to a combination of an electric dipole and a magnetic dipole. Therefore, NMHA gives designers more freedom to adjust the size for achieving self-resonant structures. Moreover, NMHA can be effectively used in complex environments, including the dielectric and metal environments. Besides that, the NMHA can increase the gain factor when placed on the metal reflecting surface and attached with the tap feed for the impedance matching [2, 3]. Currently, NMHA is being proposed for the usage in medical sensors [4–8].There are many research results on NMHA; the authors have proposed equations that can be used for designing antennas to achieve self-resonance [9–11], adding the tap feed to the NMHA for impedance matching [2, 3], calculating stored electromagnetic powers and Q factors of NMHA [12], and applying NMHA in TPMS devices [13, 14] and RFID devices [15].Previously, electrical characteristics of NMHA were obtained through electromagnetic simulations. In practical design of NMHA, equational expressions for the main electrical characteristics are more convenient. Electrical performances of NMHA can be expressed by a combination of a short dipole and small loops. Applicability of equations for a short dipole and a small loop to very small normal-mode helical antennas such as those around 1/100 wavelengths was not clear. In this paper, accuracies of equational expressions for input resistances, antenna efficiency, and axial ratios are ensured through comparisons with electromagnetic simulation results by FEKO software [16] at 402 MHz. In addition, a 0.021 λ antenna is fabricated, and measurements are performed to confirm the design accuracy. This paper is divided into 5 sections. Section 1 is the introduction. In Section 2, the structure and characteristic of the very small normal-mode helical antenna are analyzed. Section 3 presents the equations from basic antenna patterns (small loop and small dipole) that can be employed to design NMHA. Section 4 investigates the applicability of equations used to design, and Section 5 is the conclusion.


## 2. Electrical Characteristics of a Normal-Mode Helical Antenna

Figure1 illustrates the configuration of NMHA [2]. An equivalent current model of NMHA has been given by Kraus [18]. NMHA can be analyzed by the small dipole and the small loop.Figure 1
Conceptual equivalence of a normal-mode helical antenna.A spiral current is divided into a straight current and a loop current, corresponding to an electric current source of a small dipole and a magnetic current source of a small loop. Small dipole and small loop antennas have the input impedance ofRrD−jXD and RrL+jXL, respectively. Here, RrD and RrL express the radiation resistance of the antenna with RrD being the resistance of the small dipole and RrL being the resistance of the small loops, and Rl indicates the dissipated resistance of the antenna wire.In Figure1, the antenna length, antenna diameter, and number of turns are denoted by HA, DA, and N, respectively; d indicates the diameter of the antenna wire. NMHA can achieve the self-resonance by selecting the sizes of HA, DA, and N carefully.In the designing and fabricating process, the electrical parameters of NMHA need to be calculated. The basic parameters of NMHA for antenna designing and the method of computing NMHA’s parameters are shown in Table1.Table 1
Parameters for designing NMHA.
Parameters
Simulator
Equations
Self-resonant structures (DA, HA, and N)
FEKO Software
Suggested [9–11]
(i)RrD, RrL, and Rl
(ii) Efficiency (η)
(iii) Radiation field (Eθ, Eφ)
(iv) Axial ratio (AR)
FEKO Software
Not investigated yetIn order to investigate the equations used to design NMHA, we used the FEKO simulator to compare the results of the survey at 402 MHz with the results calculated by using the proposed equation. Simulation parameters of NMHA used in free space are shown in Table2. The diameter of the antenna wire is set to be d=0.5mm. Metallic wire is defined as copper with conductivity σ = 58 × 106 (1/Ωm). Mesh size of the antenna wire is set to be λ/600. Antenna parameters such as height (H/λ) and diameter (D/λ) need to be adjusted to make NMHA achieve the self-resonance in various numbers of turns (N=5, 7, and 10.Table 2
Simulation parameter of NMHA in free space.
Parameters
Values
Frequency
402 MHz (λ=745.7mm)
Mesh size of the antenna wire
λ/600
Number of turns (N)
5, 7, 10
Diameter of the antenna wire (d)
0.5 mm
Metallic wire
Copper (σ = 58 × 106 (1/Ωm))
Memory
664 kb
Time per each simulation
5 s


## 3. Basic Equations Used to Design NMHA

### 3.1. Self-Resonant Structures Based on the Previously Obtained Equation

From Figure1, the antenna input impedance is expressed by the following equation:
(1)Zin=RrD+RrL+Rl+jXL−XD.The self-resonant condition of NMHA is expressed byXL=XD. Here, XL and XD are the inductive reactance and capacitive reactance of the loop antenna and the dipole antenna, respectively. The expressions of XL and XD of NMHA depend on antenna structures in free space. These have been given by [9–11] as follows:
(2)XD=279λHANπ0.92HA+DA2,XL=600π×19.7NDA2λ9DA+20HA.WhenXL=XD, from (7) and (8), the self-resonant equation is derived by normalization on both sides of the equation as follows:
(3)279HA/λNπ0.92HA/λ+DA/λ2=600π×19.7NDA/λ29DA/λ+20HA/λ.By solving (3), antenna parameters, including height (HA), diameter (DA), and the number of turns, are determined. In this paper, only very small NMHA, with the size ranging from 0.005 λ to 0.03 λ, is investigated [9].The comparison between the result from the simulation and that from (3) was demonstrated in Figure 2. The four structures of NMHA, which were chosen for investigation, are denoted as A, B, C, and D. The structure D is fabricated and measured. Details of these structures are shown in Table 3. A good agreement is obtained between the simulation and the equation results. Therefore, the accuracy of (3) is confirmed.Figure 2
Comparing results calculated by equations and the simulation of NMHA self-resonant structure in free space.Table 3
NMHA structures chosen for investigation.
Values
H/λ
D/λ
Sim.
Eq.
Meas.
Sim.
Eq.
Meas.
A (N=5)
0.03
0.03
0.0289
0.0285
B (N=7)
0.005
0.005
0.0138
0.0130
C (N=7)
0.02
0.02
0.0150
0.0151
D (N=10)
0.021
0.021
0.021
0.0201
0.0199
0.0195


### 3.2. Expressions for Resistances

NMHA self-resonant structure is achieved whenXD=XL. The input resistance of NMHA is expressed by the following equation:
(4)RA=RrD+RrL+Rl,where the resistance components, the antenna efficiency, and the antenna ratio depend on the structural parameters, which are expressed by [17, 18]
(5)RrD=20π2HAλ2,(6)RrL=320π6DA2λ4N2,(7)Rl=αLtd120σλ,(8)η=RrD+RrLRrD+RrL+Rl,(9)AR=EφEθ,where Eφ is the radiation characteristics of the small loop and Eθ is the radiation characteristics of the small dipole. Both of them are components in the configurations of NMHA.


## 3.1. Self-Resonant Structures Based on the Previously Obtained Equation

From Figure1, the antenna input impedance is expressed by the following equation:
(1)Zin=RrD+RrL+Rl+jXL−XD.The self-resonant condition of NMHA is expressed byXL=XD. Here, XL and XD are the inductive reactance and capacitive reactance of the loop antenna and the dipole antenna, respectively. The expressions of XL and XD of NMHA depend on antenna structures in free space. These have been given by [9–11] as follows:
(2)XD=279λHANπ0.92HA+DA2,XL=600π×19.7NDA2λ9DA+20HA.WhenXL=XD, from (7) and (8), the self-resonant equation is derived by normalization on both sides of the equation as follows:
(3)279HA/λNπ0.92HA/λ+DA/λ2=600π×19.7NDA/λ29DA/λ+20HA/λ.By solving (3), antenna parameters, including height (HA), diameter (DA), and the number of turns, are determined. In this paper, only very small NMHA, with the size ranging from 0.005 λ to 0.03 λ, is investigated [9].The comparison between the result from the simulation and that from (3) was demonstrated in Figure 2. The four structures of NMHA, which were chosen for investigation, are denoted as A, B, C, and D. The structure D is fabricated and measured. Details of these structures are shown in Table 3. A good agreement is obtained between the simulation and the equation results. Therefore, the accuracy of (3) is confirmed.Figure 2
Comparing results calculated by equations and the simulation of NMHA self-resonant structure in free space.Table 3
NMHA structures chosen for investigation.
Values
H/λ
D/λ
Sim.
Eq.
Meas.
Sim.
Eq.
Meas.
A (N=5)
0.03
0.03
0.0289
0.0285
B (N=7)
0.005
0.005
0.0138
0.0130
C (N=7)
0.02
0.02
0.0150
0.0151
D (N=10)
0.021
0.021
0.021
0.0201
0.0199
0.0195


## 3.2. Expressions for Resistances

NMHA self-resonant structure is achieved whenXD=XL. The input resistance of NMHA is expressed by the following equation:
(4)RA=RrD+RrL+Rl,where the resistance components, the antenna efficiency, and the antenna ratio depend on the structural parameters, which are expressed by [17, 18]
(5)RrD=20π2HAλ2,(6)RrL=320π6DA2λ4N2,(7)Rl=αLtd120σλ,(8)η=RrD+RrLRrD+RrL+Rl,(9)AR=EφEθ,where Eφ is the radiation characteristics of the small loop and Eθ is the radiation characteristics of the small dipole. Both of them are components in the configurations of NMHA.


## 4. Investigating the Applicability of Equations Used for Defining NMHA Parameters

In order to verify (5), (6), (7), (8), and (9), A, B, C, and D structures in Figure 2 are also investigated. The calculation results are compared with the simulation results by a FEKO simulator.


### 4.1. Investigating Equations for Calculating Radiation Resistance

The radiation resistance of structure A in Figure2 is as follows: according to (5) and (6), RrD=0.177Ω, RrL=0.335Ω, and the radiation resistance of structure A is Rr=0.512Ω, while the simulation result of the radiation resistance is Rr=0.473Ω. The difference between the simulation and the equation results is 0.039 Ω, corresponding to about 8.2%. Similarly, the radiation resistance obtained at point B is as follows: according to (5) and (6), RrD=0.005Ω, RrL=0.035Ω, and Rr=0.040Ω, while the simulation result of radiation resistance is Rr=0.031Ω. The difference between the simulation and the equation results is 0.009 Ω, corresponding to about 29%. Radiation resistance of structure C is obtained as follows: according to (5) and (6), Rr=0.178Ω, while the simulation result of radiation resistance is Rr=0.210Ω. The difference between the simulation and the equation results is 0.032 Ω, corresponding to about 15.2%.The comparison between the equation results and the simulation results is shown in Figure3. As can be seen, the simulation and equation results are similar. Because of the very small antenna structure HA=0.005λ (HA=3.729mm), the radiation resistance becomes very small leading to a difference that is quite large (about 30%). However, this difference is acceptable.Figure 3
Comparison of NMHA radiation resistance in free space between the equation results and the simulation results.Therefore, (5) and (6) can be used to calculate NMHA resistance radiation with the deviation of less than 30%.


### 4.2. Investigating Equations for Calculating Ohmic Resistance

From (7), Lt, λ, and σ are the total length, wavelength, and conductivity, respectively, of the antenna wire. α is the coefficient of the tapered current distribution. α is determined by calculating the current Il along the length of the antenna wire Lt [18].
(10)Il=IMsinπLtLt2−l−Lt2,I0=IMLt∫0LtsinπLtLt2−l−Lt2dl=IMLt∫0Lt/2sinπLtldl+IMLt∫Lt2LtsinπLtLt−ldl=2πIM≅0.6IM.Here,I0 is the average current of the antenna wire, IM is the amplitude of the feed current at the middle antenna wire. 0.6 is the appropriate value of α. Equation (7) gives the correct results at α=0.6. Figure 4 illustrates the NMHA ohmic resistance in free space. Due to very small structures, Rl is very small. Calculation results by adopting the equation and simulation results are nearly the same.Figure 4
Comparison of NMHA ohmic resistance in free space between the equation results and the simulation results.With structure A, atN=5 and HA=0.03λ, the difference of the simulation and the equation results is the largest. The ohmic resistance obtained by (7) equals to 0.676 Ω, and the ohmic resistance obtained by the simulation equals to 0.616 Ω. The difference is 0.06 Ω, corresponding to about 9.8%. Therefore, (7) is relatively accurate; then, it can be used to calculate ohmic resistance with deviation of less than 10%.When (5), (6), and (7) were investigated, by using (4), the input resistance of NMHA is relatively accurate. Figure 5 illustrates the comparison of NMHA input resistance in free space. It is clear that the simulation and equation results are nearly identical. Therefore, 4 is reliable, with the deviation less than 13%.Figure 5
Comparisons of NMHA input resistance in free space.In order to confirm the results of the comparison between (4) and the simulations, the structures of the antenna, which is equal to 0.021 λ, were fabricated and measured. With structure D, the result of the input resistance (RA) is obtained as follows: the result of the simulation is 0.871 Ω, the result of (4) is 0.961 Ω, and the measured result is 0.888 Ω. The difference between the measurement and the equation results is 0.073 Ω, corresponding to about 8.2%. Hence, (4) is confirmed.In very small structures,RA is about 0.5 Ω to 1.2 Ω, with the NMHA structure being about 0.005 λ to 0.03 λ. Hence, the radiation resistance is much smaller than that of the transmission line (50 Ω).


### 4.3. Investigating Equations for Calculating Antenna Efficiency

Figure6 shows the radiation performance of NMHA obtained by the simulation and (8) in free space. In structure B, the difference between the simulation and equation results is the largest. The antenna efficiency obtained by (8) is equal to 8.07%, and the antenna efficiency obtained by the simulation is equal to 6.20%. It means that the deviation between the antenna efficiency given by the equation and simulation is 1.87%. Among all of the investigated structures, B has the largest deviation (about 30%).Figure 6
Comparison of NMHA efficiency.Hence, (8) can be used to calculate NMHA radiation performance in free space with a maximum deviation of 30%. Calculation results also prove that the antenna performance increases when its dimension increases.The relationship between the antenna structures and antenna efficiency is shown in Figure7. As observed, NMHA achieves relatively high performance, even its size is very small. When designing NMHA, Figure 7 is the basis to determine the antenna radiation efficiency.Figure 7
Relationship between the antenna structures and antenna efficiency of NMHA.


### 4.4. Investigating Equations for Calculating Axial Ratio

From (9), Eθ is the radiation characteristics of the small dipole, and it is expressed as
(11)Eθ=IHAe−JkRJ4πϖε1R3+JkR2+k2Rsinθ.Here,I indicates the antenna current, k is the wave number, and R is the distance from the antenna. 1/R3 and 1/R2 represent the static electric field and the inductive electric field, respectively. As the value of R increases, the values of 1/R2 and 1/R3 decrease rapidly. 1/R denotes the far-radiated electric field of the antenna. By applying σ, ε, and ω to 11 and then transforming, we obtain the following expression for the radiation characteristics of the small dipole:
(12)Eθ=J60πIHAsinθλR.From (9), Eφ is the radiation characteristics of the small loop, and it is expressed as
(13)Eφ=−JϖμINSe−jkR4π1R2+jkRsinθ.By applyingσ, ε, and ω to (13) and then transforming, we obtain the following expression for the radiation characteristics of the small loop:
(14)Eφ=30π3INDA2sinθλ2R.By applying (12) and (14) to (9) and then transforming, we obtain the following expression for the axial ratio as
(15)AR=EφEθ=π2NDA2HAλ=12π4N2DA2HA2λ2=12RrLRrD.Figure8 shows the calculated results of the axial ratio by using (15) and the simulation. Figure 8 shows that there is a very good agreement between the simulation and equation results, with a maximum deviation of 3%. Therefore, (9) can be used to design NMHA.Figure 8
Comparison of the axial ratio of NMHA.The relationship between the antenna structures and axial ratio is displayed in Figure9. NMHA is possible to adjust its structure for achieving its directivity to meet the application requirements. When AR=0dB, the radiation components of the electric dipole and magnetic dipole of NMHA are the same. When AR>0dB, the radiation component of the magnetic dipole is larger. When designing NMHA, based on the requirement of using the electric dipole and magnetic dipole, we can use Figure 9 to define the antenna size.Figure 9
The relationship between the antenna structures and axial ratio.


## 4.1. Investigating Equations for Calculating Radiation Resistance

The radiation resistance of structure A in Figure2 is as follows: according to (5) and (6), RrD=0.177Ω, RrL=0.335Ω, and the radiation resistance of structure A is Rr=0.512Ω, while the simulation result of the radiation resistance is Rr=0.473Ω. The difference between the simulation and the equation results is 0.039 Ω, corresponding to about 8.2%. Similarly, the radiation resistance obtained at point B is as follows: according to (5) and (6), RrD=0.005Ω, RrL=0.035Ω, and Rr=0.040Ω, while the simulation result of radiation resistance is Rr=0.031Ω. The difference between the simulation and the equation results is 0.009 Ω, corresponding to about 29%. Radiation resistance of structure C is obtained as follows: according to (5) and (6), Rr=0.178Ω, while the simulation result of radiation resistance is Rr=0.210Ω. The difference between the simulation and the equation results is 0.032 Ω, corresponding to about 15.2%.The comparison between the equation results and the simulation results is shown in Figure3. As can be seen, the simulation and equation results are similar. Because of the very small antenna structure HA=0.005λ (HA=3.729mm), the radiation resistance becomes very small leading to a difference that is quite large (about 30%). However, this difference is acceptable.Figure 3
Comparison of NMHA radiation resistance in free space between the equation results and the simulation results.Therefore, (5) and (6) can be used to calculate NMHA resistance radiation with the deviation of less than 30%.


## 4.2. Investigating Equations for Calculating Ohmic Resistance

From (7), Lt, λ, and σ are the total length, wavelength, and conductivity, respectively, of the antenna wire. α is the coefficient of the tapered current distribution. α is determined by calculating the current Il along the length of the antenna wire Lt [18].
(10)Il=IMsinπLtLt2−l−Lt2,I0=IMLt∫0LtsinπLtLt2−l−Lt2dl=IMLt∫0Lt/2sinπLtldl+IMLt∫Lt2LtsinπLtLt−ldl=2πIM≅0.6IM.Here,I0 is the average current of the antenna wire, IM is the amplitude of the feed current at the middle antenna wire. 0.6 is the appropriate value of α. Equation (7) gives the correct results at α=0.6. Figure 4 illustrates the NMHA ohmic resistance in free space. Due to very small structures, Rl is very small. Calculation results by adopting the equation and simulation results are nearly the same.Figure 4
Comparison of NMHA ohmic resistance in free space between the equation results and the simulation results.With structure A, atN=5 and HA=0.03λ, the difference of the simulation and the equation results is the largest. The ohmic resistance obtained by (7) equals to 0.676 Ω, and the ohmic resistance obtained by the simulation equals to 0.616 Ω. The difference is 0.06 Ω, corresponding to about 9.8%. Therefore, (7) is relatively accurate; then, it can be used to calculate ohmic resistance with deviation of less than 10%.When (5), (6), and (7) were investigated, by using (4), the input resistance of NMHA is relatively accurate. Figure 5 illustrates the comparison of NMHA input resistance in free space. It is clear that the simulation and equation results are nearly identical. Therefore, 4 is reliable, with the deviation less than 13%.Figure 5
Comparisons of NMHA input resistance in free space.In order to confirm the results of the comparison between (4) and the simulations, the structures of the antenna, which is equal to 0.021 λ, were fabricated and measured. With structure D, the result of the input resistance (RA) is obtained as follows: the result of the simulation is 0.871 Ω, the result of (4) is 0.961 Ω, and the measured result is 0.888 Ω. The difference between the measurement and the equation results is 0.073 Ω, corresponding to about 8.2%. Hence, (4) is confirmed.In very small structures,RA is about 0.5 Ω to 1.2 Ω, with the NMHA structure being about 0.005 λ to 0.03 λ. Hence, the radiation resistance is much smaller than that of the transmission line (50 Ω).


## 4.3. Investigating Equations for Calculating Antenna Efficiency

Figure6 shows the radiation performance of NMHA obtained by the simulation and (8) in free space. In structure B, the difference between the simulation and equation results is the largest. The antenna efficiency obtained by (8) is equal to 8.07%, and the antenna efficiency obtained by the simulation is equal to 6.20%. It means that the deviation between the antenna efficiency given by the equation and simulation is 1.87%. Among all of the investigated structures, B has the largest deviation (about 30%).Figure 6
Comparison of NMHA efficiency.Hence, (8) can be used to calculate NMHA radiation performance in free space with a maximum deviation of 30%. Calculation results also prove that the antenna performance increases when its dimension increases.The relationship between the antenna structures and antenna efficiency is shown in Figure7. As observed, NMHA achieves relatively high performance, even its size is very small. When designing NMHA, Figure 7 is the basis to determine the antenna radiation efficiency.Figure 7
Relationship between the antenna structures and antenna efficiency of NMHA.


## 4.4. Investigating Equations for Calculating Axial Ratio

From (9), Eθ is the radiation characteristics of the small dipole, and it is expressed as
(11)Eθ=IHAe−JkRJ4πϖε1R3+JkR2+k2Rsinθ.Here,I indicates the antenna current, k is the wave number, and R is the distance from the antenna. 1/R3 and 1/R2 represent the static electric field and the inductive electric field, respectively. As the value of R increases, the values of 1/R2 and 1/R3 decrease rapidly. 1/R denotes the far-radiated electric field of the antenna. By applying σ, ε, and ω to 11 and then transforming, we obtain the following expression for the radiation characteristics of the small dipole:
(12)Eθ=J60πIHAsinθλR.From (9), Eφ is the radiation characteristics of the small loop, and it is expressed as
(13)Eφ=−JϖμINSe−jkR4π1R2+jkRsinθ.By applyingσ, ε, and ω to (13) and then transforming, we obtain the following expression for the radiation characteristics of the small loop:
(14)Eφ=30π3INDA2sinθλ2R.By applying (12) and (14) to (9) and then transforming, we obtain the following expression for the axial ratio as
(15)AR=EφEθ=π2NDA2HAλ=12π4N2DA2HA2λ2=12RrLRrD.Figure8 shows the calculated results of the axial ratio by using (15) and the simulation. Figure 8 shows that there is a very good agreement between the simulation and equation results, with a maximum deviation of 3%. Therefore, (9) can be used to design NMHA.Figure 8
Comparison of the axial ratio of NMHA.The relationship between the antenna structures and axial ratio is displayed in Figure9. NMHA is possible to adjust its structure for achieving its directivity to meet the application requirements. When AR=0dB, the radiation components of the electric dipole and magnetic dipole of NMHA are the same. When AR>0dB, the radiation component of the magnetic dipole is larger. When designing NMHA, based on the requirement of using the electric dipole and magnetic dipole, we can use Figure 9 to define the antenna size.Figure 9
The relationship between the antenna structures and axial ratio.


## 5. Conclusions

In this paper, we investigated the equation use to design very small NMHA (the structure of NMHA is about 0.005λ to 0.03 λ), including self-resonant conditions, radiation resistance, input resistance, antenna efficiency, and axial ratio. The proposed equations at the frequency of 402 MHz are compared to the simulation results performed by a FEKO simulator. The results are as follows: the equation can be used to calculate the radiation resistance with a maximum deviation of 30%. The equation can be used to calculate the ohmic resistance with a maximum deviation of 10%. The equation can be used to calculate the input resistance with a maximum deviation of 13%. The equation can be used to calculate the antenna efficiency with a maximum deviation of 30%. The equation can be used to calculate the axial ratio with a maximum deviation of 3%.The input resistance results also show that, for very small structures,RA is very small (about 1 Ω). So, it is necessary to use impedance matching techniques for antennas and transmission lines, although the radiation efficiency is quite large.In order to improve the calculation of NMHA’s parameters, it is necessary to investigate the equations for the purpose of calculating the antenna’s bandwidth. This is a problem that will be solved in the future.



---

*Source: 7967468-2018-04-02.xml*