# A Novel Ultrawideband Gear-Shaped Dielectric Ring Resonator Antenna

Authors: Mehdi Ghorbani; Habib Ghorbaninejad
Journal: Mathematical Problems in Engineering
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

In this study, a novel ultrawideband (UWB) dielectric ring resonator (DRR) antenna has been proposed. DRR antennas include a single monopole antenna in the center of a ground plane and a dielectric with a symmetric structure around the monopole. This structure will lead to ultrawide band antenna. However, it is still possible to enhance the antenna bandwidth. In this study, we combine the DRR structure with an array antenna. The proposed antenna includes a circular array of four triangle resonators, which is rotated around the center of the triangle base to form a gear-shaped ring resonator antenna. In this design, characteristics of all these antennas are combined to enhance the antenna bandwidth including triangular dielectric resonator, circular array antenna, dielectric ring resonator structure, and a quarter-wave electric monopole. Triangular dielectric resonator antennas are wideband and in small size. Ring resonator antennas are inherently ultrawideband. Quarter-wave electric monopole and circular array structure can also enhance antenna bandwidth. This novel shape of the DRR antenna possesses the wider impedance bandwidth compared to similar works. Impedance bandwidth is 150% (5.2–36.1 GHz), and the bandwidth ratio is 1 : 6.9, which is much greater than earlier reports.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Dielectric resonator antennas (DRA) are very attractive topics due to a great variety of reasons. These antennas’ benefits include small size, low cost, high radiation efficiency, and low losses due to the elimination of the conductor loss. Moreover, UWB antennas can widely be used in portable broadband wireless, radar, navigation, GPS, the biomedical system, mobile satellite communications, the direct broadcast system, and telemetry. For wideband applications, a variety of techniques were applied to improve the bandwidth of these antennas. Dielectric ring resonator (DRR) antennas are a kind of DRAs which intrinsically possess wide bandwidth.In 2002, a research group discovered that the combination of a quarter-wave electric monopole and a ring resonator will lead to wideband structure [1]. Hemispherical, conical, and annular resonators are the most common shapes for design of DRR antenna. In [2], a hemispherical and a conical DRR antenna was investigated and the bandwidth ratio of 4 : 1 was reported. In [3], an annular DRR with the step in outer radius was announced.In DRR antennas, as will be discussed in more detail in Section4, the first resonance is due to the monopole in λ/4, and the next resonance is due to the resonator. In fact, the second resonance is activated by mode TM01δ [4]. There are series of resonances in odd multiples of quarter wavelength. For achieving high bandwidth, plenty of research has been driven toward feed modification and resonator structure. As an illustration, stacked forms of aforementioned shapes can significantly improve impedance bandwidth. A pawn-shaped DRR antenna was designed by attaching conical and hemispherical shapes [5]. In [6], two stacked conical DRR with the same and opposite directions were investigated. In [7], a stacked form of a double annular DRR antenna with different permitivities was investigated. In [8], three different methods of impedance matching, dielectric, and ground plane are applied in order to enhance the antenna bandwidth. As mentioned before, modification of the feeding is another technique on impedance matching and bandwidth enhancement. Other shapes of feeding include L-shaped microstrip [9], annular-shaped microstrip [10], a tilted modified square-shaped aperture [11], and circular-shaped offset feed [12] for 3-band applications. In [13], the high permittivity and low losses properties of the ceramic material were used for manufacturing the magnetic resonance probes.In recent studies, more focus is on the feed modification methods to improve antenna features. However, beside this, it is still possible to improve the antenna characteristics using traditional feeding for new structures. In this study, the potential of combination of the DRR antenna and array antenna is demonstrated.Referenced studies reveal inherent potential of DRR antennas for wideband applications. However, it is possible to improve antenna bandwidth more efficiently. In this regard, based on our knowledge, we have combined and promoted array formation of elements on dielectric ring resonator antenna concept for the first time. Array formation is usually used to enhance antenna gain. However, it can be used to enhance antenna impedance bandwidth. Using these two techniques has concurrently enhanced antenna impedance bandwidth significantly. The impedance bandwidth of the antenna has been outlined and compared with some works of literature in Table1. This table clearly demonstrates the efficacy of the design. For antenna elements, an isosceles triangular dielectric resonator (TDR) has been opted due to its potential for wideband applications [14].Table 1
Comparison between the proposed antenna and some previous literatures.
Reference no.Frequency range (GHz)Bandwidth (%)Bandwidth ratioPermittivity75.6–22.41264 : 11081.95–7.051103.6 : 110105.5–23.01224.2 : 110112.8–15.21385.4 : 110123.6–5.5421.5 : 136, 4131.8–6.91173.8 : 110153.49–7.2066.72.1 : 122PA∗5.2–36.11506.9 : 110.2∗PA, the proposed antenna.In this study, a novel shape of ultrawideband DRR antenna has been proposed. The DRR antenna is a gear-shaped DRR antenna, including a circular array of four triangular dielectric resonators. The resonator is located on an extended conducting ground plane and is fed by a quarter-wave monopole probe. The proposed antenna has been simulated with HFSS, and dimensions have been optimized using an extensive parametric study in order to achieve best results.In this study, in Section2, antenna configuration will be discussed. In Section 3 (design steps), the effect of antenna parameters on the reflection coefficient chart will be shown and explained. Then, the antenna will be simulated with different softwares and the result will be compared with relevant works in Section 4. In Section 5, theory of the antenna will be elaborated. Finally in Section 6, the whole work will be concluded.


## 2. Antenna Configuration

Figure1(a) shows the 3D view of the proposed antenna. The resonator is located on the conducting ground plane and is excited with a coaxial probe as a quarter-wave monopole. The ground plane is square shaped with dimensions of g × g (70 × 70 mm2). The probe is a 50 ohm coaxial cable with an inner conductor radius of 0.65 mm and height of p.Figure 1
(a) 3D view, (b) DRR configuration, and (c) elements of the proposed DRR.
(a)(b)(c)The resonator includes the dielectric material of RO3010 with permittivity of 10.2 and dissipation factor 0.0035. Figures1(b) and 1(c) show the DRR configuration and antenna parameters. The proposed DRR is composed of four arrays of triangle elements, which are rotated around the center of the base side of the triangle (center of the coordinate system, and dimensions of these triangles consist the base side (b), the median (a), and central hole radius (r)). Table 2 provides the final dimensions of the proposed antenna.Table 2
Final dimensions of the proposed antenna (all dimensions in mm).
ParameterDescriptionValue (mm)gGround plane width and length70.0aTriangle median6.0bTriangle base2.0rDrilled hole diameter1.7hDRR antenna height7.0pProbe height12.0eProbe radius0.65


## 3. Design Steps

Step 1.
Triangle median size (a): Figure 2 shows the antenna reflection coefficient in accordance with the triangle median (a).
The triangle antenna’s median is one of the most important parameters in impedance bandwidth. In the first half of the bandwidth, there are two resonances due to monopole (at 6.2 GHz and 15.1 GHz) and two other resonances due to the resonator (at 9.8 GHz and 11.8 GHz). Lower values of the triangle median deteriorate the reflection coefficient at the frequencies around 13 GHz, and its higher values worsen the reflection coefficient at the frequencies around 8 GHz. Therefore,a = 6.0 mm is the best value for triangle median.Figure 2
Reflection coefficient of the proposed antenna in accordance with triangle median.Step 2.
Triangle base size (b): Figure 3 shows the reflection coefficient of the proposed antenna in accordance with the base size of the triangle (b). This figure shows that this parameter does not have a significant effect on the first half of the bandwidth. Also, it shows that the decrease of base size slightly improves antenna bandwidth, while disturbing return loss at some other frequencies including 8, 20, and 32 GHz. Moreover, it moves resonant frequencies in the second half of the bandwidth. On the whole, b = 2.0 mm is the best value for the size of the triangle base.Figure 3
Reflection coefficient of the proposed antenna in accordance with base triangle.Step 3.
Central hole radius (r): at the next step of the design process, the effect of central hole radius of the DRR is investigated. Figure 4 shows the reflection coefficient of the proposed antenna with the central hole radius (r). This figure depicts that an increase in r improves bandwidth, but it increases return loss. Therefore, it disturbs the return loss in some frequencies. Also, it can be seen that the parameter of r does not have a significant effect on the resonant frequencies.Figure 4
Reflection coefficient of the proposed antenna in accordance with central hole radius.Step 4.
DRR antenna height (h): at the next step of the design process, the proposed DRR antenna height is investigated. Figure 5 shows the reflection coefficient of the proposed antenna in accordance with the parameter of h. This figure shows that an increase in the parameter of h reduces impedance bandwidth and simultaneously disturbs return loss in some ranges of frequencies, especially around 13.5 GHz and 21 GHz. For lower values of h, return loss is improved at higher frequencies, in order to improve bandwidth but it disturbs it at lower frequencies, especially around 25 GHz and 33 GHz. Therefore, it restricts the impedance bandwidth. From the figure, h = 7.0 mm is the best value for the antenna height.Figure 5
Reflection coefficient of the proposed antenna in accordance with DRR antenna height.Step 5.
Probe height (p): Figure 6 shows the effect of the probe height on antenna return loss. This figure depicts that probe height has a significant effect in almost all resonance frequencies and the reflection coefficient chart. From this figure, it can clearly be seen that the probe height of p = 12 mm possesses the best reflection coefficient chart and impedance matching feature.Figure 6
Reflection coefficient of the proposed antenna in accordance with probe height.Step 6.
Probe radius (e): Figure 7 shows the effect of the probe diameter on the antenna reflection coefficient. From this figure, it can clearly be seen that the probe diameter has no effect on the antenna bandwidth in lower values of e.
For all of the values ofe, starting and ending points are coincided; however, in some higher frequency ranges, they trespass the criteria of −10 dB of the reflection coefficient chart. But this issue can be solved by other parameters reoptimization. It can also be seen that almost all frequency resonances remain constant.Figure 7
Reflection coefficient of the proposed antenna in accordance with probe diameter.


## 4. Results and Comparison

The proposed antenna has been simulated and optimized using HFSS, and a good characteristic has been achieved. The impedance bandwidth of the antenna is 150% (5.2–36.1 GHz). Figure8 shows the efficiency and the gain of the proposed antenna. Efficiency of the proposed antenna is between 93% and 97% in the whole bandwidth.Figure 8
(a), (b) Gain of the proposed antenna. (c) Efficiency.
(a)(b)(c)Table1 provides the summary comparison between the proposed antenna and some similar studies. From the table, it can be found that the proposed antenna possesses an excellent ultrabandwidth feature. The radiation pattern is also good in lower frequencies, but it disturbed slightly in higher frequencies.


### 4.1. Comparison of the Results from HFSS and CST

The proposed antenna has been simulated with HFSS and CST, and the same results have been achieved. Figure9 shows the reflection coefficient of the antenna simulated with these two softwares, which are based on the method of moment (MoM) and finite element method (FEM), respectively. It can clearly be seen that the same results have been achieved. Results from these two different methods validate the antenna characteristics.Figure 9
Reflection coefficient of the proposed antenna simulated with HFSS and CST.Figure10 depicts the radiation pattern of the antenna at 10 GHz, 20 GHz, and 30 GHz simulated with HFSS and CST. It can clearly be seen that a good agreement has been achieved.Figure 10
Radiation pattern of the proposed antenna simulated in HFSS and CST at (a) 10 GHz, (b) 20 GHz, and (c) 30 GHz.
(a)(b)(c)Figure11 shows the E-field patterns of the proposed antenna at resonance frequencies. Figure 11(a) (6.2 GHz) shows the main resonance of the monopole at 6.2 GHz (λ/4). At this frequency TE10 has been activated. Similarly, Figure 11(d) depicts the second resonance of monopole, and the TE mode is activated.Figure 11
E-field pattern of the antenna at (a) 6.2 GHz, (b) 9.8 GHz, (c) 11.8 GHz, (d) 15.1 GHz, (e) 21 GHz, (f) 22.8 GHz, (g) 29.5 GHz, and (h) 32.2 GHz.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)In Figures11(b), 11(c), and 11(e), electric field distributions inside the DRR have been shown. These figures demonstrate that Ez≠0 and Hz = 0. Therefore, TM modes are activated due to resonator overall dimension and configuration.Figure11(g) (29.5 GHz) is due to electric monopole (at 5λ/4), and Figures 11(f) and 11(h) depict the electric field distributions produced by the resonator. These frequencies include both Ez and Hz, and hybrid modes have been activated.


## 4.1. Comparison of the Results from HFSS and CST

The proposed antenna has been simulated with HFSS and CST, and the same results have been achieved. Figure9 shows the reflection coefficient of the antenna simulated with these two softwares, which are based on the method of moment (MoM) and finite element method (FEM), respectively. It can clearly be seen that the same results have been achieved. Results from these two different methods validate the antenna characteristics.Figure 9
Reflection coefficient of the proposed antenna simulated with HFSS and CST.Figure10 depicts the radiation pattern of the antenna at 10 GHz, 20 GHz, and 30 GHz simulated with HFSS and CST. It can clearly be seen that a good agreement has been achieved.Figure 10
Radiation pattern of the proposed antenna simulated in HFSS and CST at (a) 10 GHz, (b) 20 GHz, and (c) 30 GHz.
(a)(b)(c)Figure11 shows the E-field patterns of the proposed antenna at resonance frequencies. Figure 11(a) (6.2 GHz) shows the main resonance of the monopole at 6.2 GHz (λ/4). At this frequency TE10 has been activated. Similarly, Figure 11(d) depicts the second resonance of monopole, and the TE mode is activated.Figure 11
E-field pattern of the antenna at (a) 6.2 GHz, (b) 9.8 GHz, (c) 11.8 GHz, (d) 15.1 GHz, (e) 21 GHz, (f) 22.8 GHz, (g) 29.5 GHz, and (h) 32.2 GHz.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)In Figures11(b), 11(c), and 11(e), electric field distributions inside the DRR have been shown. These figures demonstrate that Ez≠0 and Hz = 0. Therefore, TM modes are activated due to resonator overall dimension and configuration.Figure11(g) (29.5 GHz) is due to electric monopole (at 5λ/4), and Figures 11(f) and 11(h) depict the electric field distributions produced by the resonator. These frequencies include both Ez and Hz, and hybrid modes have been activated.


## 5. Theory

The monopole has resonant frequencies in odd multiples of quarter wavelength. In this case, monopole height isp = 12 mm. Therefore, according to equation (1), the resonant frequencies of the monopole are 6.25 GHz, 18.75 GHz, and 31.25 GHz.(1)fr=14,34,54,…∗CP,where C is the light velocity in free space. These resonant frequencies are shown in Figure 12(a), red dash line. In Figure 12(a), the reflection coefficient of the antenna without gear resonator has been shown. This figure shows that the antenna resonates at 5.80 GHz, 17.80 GHz, and 30.2 GHz, which are close to the resonance frequencies calculated from the equation. These frequencies moved to 6.20 GHz, 15.10 GHz, and 29.5 GHz due to applying the resonator. These reductions, particularly at the second resonance, are from capacitive loading of the resonator. Therefore, these frequencies are expected to remain unchanged by changing the relative permittivity of the resonator. Figure 12(b) shows that these resonance frequencies remain unchanged with relative permittivity, while other resonance frequencies have been decreased with increasing the permittivity of the resonator.Figure 12
(a) Reflection coefficient of the proposed antenna compared to monopole alone. (b) Reflection coefficient for permittivity of 10.2 and 12. (c) Real and imaginary part of the input impedance.
(a)(b)(c)Figure12(c) shows the real and imaginary part of the characteristic impedance. This figure shows that the imaginary part of the Z0 at 6.20 GHz, 29.5 GHz are positive, and then, they have not significantly moved after applying the resonator, while it is negative at 15.1 GHz. Therefore, this resonance frequency has been decreased 3.65 GHz, in comparison with the monopole only.


## 6. Conclusion

In this study, a novel ultrawideband DRR antenna has been proposed. It includes a quarter-wave monopole which resonates in odd multiples of quarter wavelength. Therefore, using a wideband structure can cover these gaps between monopole resonances to enhance antenna bandwidth. Moreover, it is well known that array antennas are used in wideband applications. Therefore, combination of these two techniques can enhance the impedance bandwidth. The last step is to find a suitable shape for array elements. In this regard, a triangular dielectric resonator (TDR) is opted. TDR antennas are small sized and wideband. In general, designing an antenna using all mentioned above has the potential of wideband application.The proposed antenna consists of a novel gear-shaped DRR which is located on the conducting ground plane and is fed using a coaxial probe as a quarter-wave monopole. The DRR profile consists of a circular array of four triangle resonators. The resonators turn around the monopole and connect to each other from the apex of the base side to form a gear shape. The proposed antenna is designed and optimized using HFSS, and an ultrahigh bandwidth has been achieved. The proposed antenna has an impedance bandwidth of 150% (5.2–36.1 GHz) with 6.94 : 1 bandwidth ratio.



---

*Source: 8069873-2021-07-13.xml*