# Dual-Band Antenna/AMC Combination for RFID

Authors: M. E. de Cos; F. Las-Heras
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

A novel antenna/Artificial Magnetic Conductor (AMC) combination usable in dual-band Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tags over metallic objects is presented. A compact and low thickness prototype is manufactured and characterized in terms of return loss and radiation properties in an anechoic chamber both alone and on a metallic plate. The performance exhibited by the presented antenna/AMC prototype is proper for RFID tags on both metallic and nonmetallic objects.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) systems, it would be desirable that the tagged objects do not have influence on the tag antenna performance. However, on the one hand if the object surface is made of a dielectric material, then the readable range is decreased due to frequency shift of the resonance frequency. On the other hand, antennas placed nearby metallic objects suffer from performance degradation. In passive RFID systems, this fact causes important problems and it hinders their global deployment [1–3]. Metallic objects seriously degrade the input impedance matching, bandwidth, radiation efficiency, and readable range of the tag antenna [4, 5]. The electromagnetic wave is greatly reflected by a conductor surface yielding a significant reduction of operating distance in RFID tags applications or total antenna malfunctioning. The negative effects increase at higher frequencies and so RFID operation in the Super High Frequency (SHF) band with tags attached to metallic objects presents an even more critical problem to be overcome.In addition, another important question in RFID tags usable with people and wearable antennas [6–8] is the backward radiation to the human body which should be reduced as much as possible.Different approaches have been proposed aiming to solve antennas on metals problems: patch antennas (already including a metallic ground plane) with the drawback of narrow bandwidth, new antenna designs like Planar Inverted F Antennas (PIFAs) with the inconvenience of shorting planes not proper for flexible devices or tags, and the use of ferroelectric materials to insulate the antenna from metal, which is rather expensive.A novel solution is proposed in this contribution combining a simple broadband antenna as a coplanar waveguide- (CPW-) fed bow-tie [9–11] with a compact dual-band Artificial Magnetic Conductor (AMC) [12] without vias. Through this combination, a dual-band compact low-cost antenna proper to be used on both dielectric and metallic objects and with reduced backward radiation [13] is obtained.The paper is organized as follows: firstly, Section2 describes the design of a CPW-fed bow-tie antenna for operation at 5.8 GHz. Then, Section 3 shows the design of a dual-band AMC resonating at 2.48 GHz and 5.8 GHz to be combined with the antenna, aiming to obtain a dual-band antenna and to insulate the antenna from metallic objects. Section 4 explains the characterization of the manufactured prototypes in terms of return loss and radiation patterns. Finally some conclusions are described in Section 5.


## 2. Antenna Design

Figure1 shows the geometry of the proposed CPW-fed bow-tie antenna suitable for operating at 5.8 GHz. Double slot bow-tie geometry has been chosen as it exhibits wider bandwidth and smaller size than simple bow-tie. The antenna is fed through a 50 Ω CPW line with Wl strip width and g gap, and it is printed on ARLON 25N dielectric substrate with h = 0.762 mm (30 mil) thickness, εr=3.28 relative dielectric permittivity and less than 0.0025 loss tangent. There is no metallization on the backside. The antenna design and optimization have been carried out by a set of MoM simulations with commercial software [14].Figure 1
Top-view of the CPW-fed bow-tie antenna geometry. Simulation results for return loss of the CPW-fed bow-tie antenna.The antenna resonance frequency is given bya (increasing a shifts the operating band to a lower frequency range), whereas the bandwidth and the level of the return loss at the main resonance frequency are controlled by b. A trade-off is necessary between parameters c and t as they are opposite in behavior. Increasing the value of c results in a reduction of both the frequency of operation as well as the impedance matching. Finally e and d can be, respectively, used for a fine bandwidth and frequency adjustment. Table 1 details the optimized antenna dimensions for operation at 5.8 GHz.Table 1
Bow-tie antenna dimensions.
Dimensions (mm)
L
W
W
L
g
a
b
c
d
e
t
35
23.8
2
0.1
32.8
13.6
6
12
2.16
6From simulated return loss shown in Figure1, it can be concluded that the operating bandwidth of the bow-tie antenna is 1.235 GHz (21.26%).


## 3. Dual-Band AMC Design

An AMC is a resonating periodic structure. The resonance frequency and the AMC operation bandwidth of an AMC structure depend on the unit-cell geometry together with the dielectric substrate’s relative permittivity and thickness.Generally AMCs [15–24] are implemented by using two-dimensional periodic metallic lattices patterned on a conductor-backed dielectric surface. Recent research efforts focus on the development of low-cost AMCs easily integrable in RF, microwave, and millimeter wave circuits. Aiming this, geometries without via holes [15] (in contrast to designs accomplished by patches with via holes [16]) as well as the use of a unilayer periodic Frequency Selective Surface (FSS) over a metallic ground plane (in contrast to multilayered FSSs [17]) should be considered. Both facts, removing via holes and using unilayer FSSs, reduce AMC operation bandwidth (which can be relevant depending on the application) and so an optimized unit-cell geometry design has to be carried out to overcome it.The inherent in-phase reflection exhibited by AMCs makes possible the reduction of backward radiation for antennas placed on them and so by combining antenna and AMC in RFID tag design, low backward radiation to the human body can be obtained.The unit-cell geometry presented in [24] is taken as reference to design a dual-band AMC. For this purpose the aforementioned geometry is surrounded by a rectangular frame (see Figure 2). The same dielectric substrate as for the antenna (ARLON 25N) is used. The unit-cell dimensions are optimized with Ansoft’s HFSS [25] so that the AMC resonates at 2.48 GHz and 5.8 GHz. Optimized dimensions are detailed in Figure 2.Figure 2
Dual-band AMC unit-cell geometry and dimensions. Simulated reflection coefficient phase of the AMC structure.Neither via holes nor multilayer substrates are required in the low-thickness dual-band AMC, simplifying implementation and reducing its cost.From Figure2 it can be concluded that the structure exhibits AMC performance from 2.48 GHz to 2.51 GHz resonating at 2.49 GHz and from 5.77 GHz to 6.05 GHz resonating at 5.91 GHz. The inner geometry mainly determines the higher resonance frequency, whereas the outer square frame has more influence on the lower resonance frequency, as it can be concluded from the surface current distribution on the metallic parts of the AMC unit-cell geometry depicted in Figure 3.Figure 3
Surface currents distribution on the AMC unit-cell geometry metallic parts at 2.49 GHz and 5.9 GHz.The AMC performance for different polarization of the electrical incident field (under normal incidence) and under oblique incidence is very important in AMC applications for RFID tags or wearable antennas. In the case of RFID tags, the angular stability of the AMC will influence the antenna radiation performance and this will have direct impact on the angular reading range depending on the position of the reader with respect to the tagged object. So an AMC design with as higher angular stability as possible is desirable.The AMC has been designed so that it operates identically for any polarization of the incident field (assuming normal incidence) due to the unit-cell design geometry which exhibits four symmetry planes. With the aim of studying the angular stability margin [26] of the presented structure, the reflection coefficient phase versus frequency for different incident angles θinc between 0° and 60° has been simulated for transverse electric (TE) polarized waves. The absolute and relative deviations of the resonance frequencies can be obtained from Figure 4. For the lower frequency band: 30 MHz, 1.2% for θinc = 45° and 149 MHz, 6% for θinc = 60°. For the upper frequency band: 20 MHz, 0.3% for θinc = 45° and 100 MHz, 1.7% for θinc = 60°. The AMC operation bandwidth is slightly reduced from θinc = 45°. From these obtained results, it can be concluded that the presented AMC design is highly stable as its angular margin ranges from 0° to 45° for the lower frequency band and from 0° to 60° for the upper frequency band. The upper frequency band is more stable regarding oblique incidence.Figure 4
Simulated reflection phase of the AMC surface for TE polarizations for different incident anglesθinc = 0°, 30°, 45°, and 60°.


## 4. Characterization Results

Laser micromachining is used to manufacture prototypes (see Figure6) of the CPW-fed bow-tie antenna alone and combined with the AMC to be characterized in terms of return loss and radiation pattern for comparison.


### 4.1. Return Loss

The results of measured return loss for the manufactured prototypes are detailed in Figures5 and 6 and Table 2.Table 2
Prototypes comparison.
CPW-antenna
Frequencies (GHz)
Bandwidth
f
Low
fr
f
Up
Total (MHz)
%
Bow-tie
—
—
—
—
—
5124
5683
6482
1358
23.89
Bow-tie-AMC
2160
2255
2315
155
6.87
5743
6137
6248
505
8.22
Bow-tie-AMC metallic plate
2056
2204
2285
229
10.39
5767
5914
6588
821
13.88Figure 5
Bow-tie antenna’s return loss.Figure 6
Measured input return loss for the prototypes: bow-tie, bow-tie-AMC, and bow-tie-AMC on a metallic plate.The bow-tie antenna exhibits a measured operating bandwidth of 1.358 GHz (23.89%), which is slightly wider than the 1.235 GHz (21.66%) obtained by simulation due to the fact that the commercial MoM software considers infinite extension for the dielectric substrate or even more likely to manufacturing tolerances.When the bow-tie antenna is placed on the AMC, the antenna resonance frequency is shifted upwards, as the AMC resonance frequency is higher than the antenna one and in addition, it has higher quality factor. Also a new resonance frequency appears at 2.255 GHz which makes the Bow-tie-AMC combination proper for dual-band applications.As it could be expected, when the bow-tie antenna alone is placed on a metallic plate the antenna resonance frequency has been shifted out of the 5.8 GHz band leading to its total malfunctioning (see Figure5). However, from Figure 6 and Table 2, the bow-tie-AMC combination exhibits proper dual-band performance both alone and when placed on a metallic plate, even showing bandwidth enhancement on a metallic plate.


### 4.2. Radiation Pattern

Measured radiation pattern cuts in theE- and H-planes of the manufactured prototypes at 2.2 GHz (lower band) and at 5.8 GHz (upper band) are, respectively, plotted in Figures 7 and 8. H-plane tends to be omnidirectional as it could be expected. The radiation pattern properties of the bow-tie-AMC for RFID application are still preserved even when it is placed on a metallic plate, as the AMC electromagnetically insulates the antenna from the metal and so the bow-tie-AMC currents distribution is not modified. From Figure 8, it can be observed how the AMC reduces the antenna backward radiation between 10 and 20 dB.Figure 7
Measured radiation pattern (normalized, in dB)E-plane (a) and H-plane (b) at 2.2 GHz.Figure 8
Measured radiation pattern (normalized, in dB)E-plane (a) and H-plane (b) at 5.8 GHz.The measurement set-up is shown in Figure9. Table 3 shows the measured Gain, directivity, and radiation efficiency at 2.2 GHz and 5.8 GHz for the manufactured prototypes.Table 3
Measured gain, directivity, and radiation efficiency.
CPW-antenna
f = 2.20 GHz
f = 5.80 GHz
G (dB)
D (dB)
η (%)
G (dB)
D (dB)
η (%)
Bow-tie
—
—
—
2.2
5.4
48
Bow-tie-AMC
3.1
6.5
46
2.4
5.9
45
Bow-tie-AMC metallic plate
2.9
6.9
40
2.1
6.4
37Figure 9
Measurement setup in anechoic chamber.From the obtained results, it can be concluded that the bow-tie-AMC combination makes possible to obtain proper dual-band operation on metallic objects preserving the antenna gain around 3 dB for the lower band and 2.2 dB for the upper band. When the bow-tie-AMC combination is placed on a metallic object, is the radiation efficiency is slightly, reduced. However, it is remarkable that the measurements on metallic plate have been carried out placing the bow-tie-AMC combination on the edge of the plate, which can be considered the worst case. If the bow-tie-AMC combination were centered on the metallic plate, theoretically, a 6 dB improvement on gain with respect to bow-tie antenna alone should be obtained with slight variation on directivity, leading to radiation efficiency improvement.


## 4.1. Return Loss

The results of measured return loss for the manufactured prototypes are detailed in Figures5 and 6 and Table 2.Table 2
Prototypes comparison.
CPW-antenna
Frequencies (GHz)
Bandwidth
f
Low
fr
f
Up
Total (MHz)
%
Bow-tie
—
—
—
—
—
5124
5683
6482
1358
23.89
Bow-tie-AMC
2160
2255
2315
155
6.87
5743
6137
6248
505
8.22
Bow-tie-AMC metallic plate
2056
2204
2285
229
10.39
5767
5914
6588
821
13.88Figure 5
Bow-tie antenna’s return loss.Figure 6
Measured input return loss for the prototypes: bow-tie, bow-tie-AMC, and bow-tie-AMC on a metallic plate.The bow-tie antenna exhibits a measured operating bandwidth of 1.358 GHz (23.89%), which is slightly wider than the 1.235 GHz (21.66%) obtained by simulation due to the fact that the commercial MoM software considers infinite extension for the dielectric substrate or even more likely to manufacturing tolerances.When the bow-tie antenna is placed on the AMC, the antenna resonance frequency is shifted upwards, as the AMC resonance frequency is higher than the antenna one and in addition, it has higher quality factor. Also a new resonance frequency appears at 2.255 GHz which makes the Bow-tie-AMC combination proper for dual-band applications.As it could be expected, when the bow-tie antenna alone is placed on a metallic plate the antenna resonance frequency has been shifted out of the 5.8 GHz band leading to its total malfunctioning (see Figure5). However, from Figure 6 and Table 2, the bow-tie-AMC combination exhibits proper dual-band performance both alone and when placed on a metallic plate, even showing bandwidth enhancement on a metallic plate.


## 4.2. Radiation Pattern

Measured radiation pattern cuts in theE- and H-planes of the manufactured prototypes at 2.2 GHz (lower band) and at 5.8 GHz (upper band) are, respectively, plotted in Figures 7 and 8. H-plane tends to be omnidirectional as it could be expected. The radiation pattern properties of the bow-tie-AMC for RFID application are still preserved even when it is placed on a metallic plate, as the AMC electromagnetically insulates the antenna from the metal and so the bow-tie-AMC currents distribution is not modified. From Figure 8, it can be observed how the AMC reduces the antenna backward radiation between 10 and 20 dB.Figure 7
Measured radiation pattern (normalized, in dB)E-plane (a) and H-plane (b) at 2.2 GHz.Figure 8
Measured radiation pattern (normalized, in dB)E-plane (a) and H-plane (b) at 5.8 GHz.The measurement set-up is shown in Figure9. Table 3 shows the measured Gain, directivity, and radiation efficiency at 2.2 GHz and 5.8 GHz for the manufactured prototypes.Table 3
Measured gain, directivity, and radiation efficiency.
CPW-antenna
f = 2.20 GHz
f = 5.80 GHz
G (dB)
D (dB)
η (%)
G (dB)
D (dB)
η (%)
Bow-tie
—
—
—
2.2
5.4
48
Bow-tie-AMC
3.1
6.5
46
2.4
5.9
45
Bow-tie-AMC metallic plate
2.9
6.9
40
2.1
6.4
37Figure 9
Measurement setup in anechoic chamber.From the obtained results, it can be concluded that the bow-tie-AMC combination makes possible to obtain proper dual-band operation on metallic objects preserving the antenna gain around 3 dB for the lower band and 2.2 dB for the upper band. When the bow-tie-AMC combination is placed on a metallic object, is the radiation efficiency is slightly, reduced. However, it is remarkable that the measurements on metallic plate have been carried out placing the bow-tie-AMC combination on the edge of the plate, which can be considered the worst case. If the bow-tie-AMC combination were centered on the metallic plate, theoretically, a 6 dB improvement on gain with respect to bow-tie antenna alone should be obtained with slight variation on directivity, leading to radiation efficiency improvement.


## 5. Conclusions

Through a proper bow-tie-AMC combination, consisting of a CPW-fed double bow-tie antenna and a dual AMC, dual-band operation on metallic objects preserving antenna gain and with slight variation on radiation efficiency can be obtained. In addition, the antenna’s backward radiation is reduced, which is a key point in wearable antennas and RFID tags usable with people.A remarkable characteristic of the bow-tie-AMC combination is its compact size: 44.1 mm (λ0/3.1 at 2.2 GHz) and low thickness: 1.524 mm (λ0/90 at 2.2 GHz) its thicker part, which makes it proper for integration in dual-band wireless communication systems. The presented design could be used in RFID applications as tag antennas for both metallic and nonmetallic objects but it could be also used in other dual-band RF systems in the SHF band.



---

*Source: 804536-2012-07-17.xml*