# Systematic Evaluation and Mechanistic Investigation of Antioxidant Activity of Fullerenols Usingβ-Carotene Bleaching Assay

Authors: Hiroshi Ueno; Shizuka Yamakura; Riya S. Arastoo; Takumi Oshima; Ken Kokubo
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

Antioxidant activity of hydroxylated fullerenes, so-called fullerenols, against lipid peroxyl radical was evaluated byβ-carotene bleaching assay. All samples showed moderate to high antioxidant activity (%AOA), especially for C60(OH)12 (70.1) and C60(OH)44 (66.0) as compared with 8, 24, 26, and 36 hydroxylated ones (31.7–62.8). The detection of the possible products was conducted in the model reaction of both fullerenols and C60 with methyl linoleate by MALDI-TOF-MS. These results suggested that the two possible mechanisms, such as C-addition to double bonds and H-abstraction from –OH groups, are involved in the present radical scavenging reaction.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Fullerene known as “radical sponge” has been recognized as a new class of antioxidant due to its high reactivity toward radical species since its first report in 1991 [1]. Reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as superoxide, hydroxyl radical, peroxyl radicals, and nitric oxide, have such radical nature and cause damage to biomolecules, including DNA, cell, protein, and lipid, inducing various diseases. For this reason, the development of biocompatible, nontoxic, and water-soluble fullerene derivatives has been strongly demanded. In the past several years, we have evaluated the ROS radical scavenging ability as “antioxidant activity” of water-soluble γ-cyclodextrin- (CD-) bicapped C60 and polyvinylpyrrolidone- (PVP-) entrapped C60 as well as the corresponding fullerene oxides (C60On) [2, 3]. However, their solubility in water still remains low and inevitable steric repulsion from the host compounds, such as CD and PVP, brings about undesirable interference for accurate bioassay.Polyhydroxylated fullerenes, so-called fullerenols, have attracted much attention in view of biological, pharmaceutical, and medical applications, because of their high hydrophilicity and the low toxicity as well as the unique spherical structure with a diameter of ca. 1 nm. In this point of view, the antioxidant activity of fullerenol has been reported in 1995 by Chiang et al. for C60(OH)12 [4] and in 2009 by Miwa et al. for highly hydroxylated fullerenol C60(OH)32 [5] as well as other bioactivities, such as the inhibitive effect for oxidative stress in adipocytes [6], protective effect of human keratinocytes from UV-induced cell injuries [7], and suppression of intracellular lipid accumulation [8]. In connection with the recent developments of these biological studies [9–11], new and facile synthetic procedures of highly hydroxylated water-soluble fullerenols have been reported [12–14]. However, little is known about their origin of antioxidant activity and the relationship between the activity and the number of hydroxyl groups. For the development of new application of these unique nanomaterials, the systematic investigation of the antioxidant activity of variously hydroxylated fullerenols, such as 8, 10, 12, 24, 26, 36, and 44 hydroxylated ones [15], is highly desirable to explore the antioxidant mechanism of fullerenols toward ROS (Figure 1).A possible isomer of fullerenols composed of a mixture of isomers and expressed by the average structures as (a) C60(OH)8 and (b) C60(OH)36.
(a)
C60(OH)8
(b)
C60(OH)36Theβ-carotene bleaching assay for evaluating antioxidant activity is one of the common methods used in the field of food chemistry [16]. The principle of the method is based on the discoloration of yellowish color of a β-carotene solution due to the breaking of π-conjugation by addition reaction of lipid or lipid peroxyl radical (L
∙ or LOO
∙) to a C=C double bond of β-carotene. The radical species is generated from the autoxidation of linoleic acid by heating under air atmosphere. When the appropriate antioxidant is added to the solution, the discoloration can be retarded by competing reaction between β-carotene and antioxidant with the subjected radicals. The structural similarity between fullerenes and β-carotene, such as highly π-conjugated molecules, enables the accurate evaluation of antioxidant activity by this β-carotene bleaching assay in contrast to other methods like DPPH radical assay [17].Herein, we report the systematic investigation of antioxidant activity of variously hydroxylated fullerenols with 8, 10, 12, 24, 26, 36, and 44 hydroxyl groups evaluated byβ-carotene bleaching assay. In combination with detecting the possible products of both fullerenols and C60 with radical species generated from methyl linoleate under autoxidation condition, we propose two antioxidant mechanisms which are dependent on the number of hydroxyl groups.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials and Apparatuses

Fullerenols C60(OH)n (n
=
44 and 36) were synthesized by the previously reported procedures using hydrogen peroxide [12, 13] and C60(OH)26 was synthesized by the modified method with a shorter reaction time (methods A and A′). Fullerenol C60(OH)~24 prepared from C60Br24 was purchased from MTR Ltd. (method B). Fullerenols C60(OH)n (n
=
12 and 8) were synthesized by the modification of the literature method using oleum (method C) [19]. Fullerene C60 was purchased from Frontier Carbon Corporation as nanom purple ST (99%).β-Carotene, linoleic acid (>99%), catechin mixture, isoflavone mixture, coenzyme Q10 (as ubiquinone-10), curcumin, and α-lipoic acid were purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. Other reagents and organic solvents as well as pure water were all commercially available and used as received. UV-visible spectra were measured on a JASCO V-550 equipped with a thermal controller. LCMS analysis was performed on a SHIMADZU LCMS-2010EV. Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectra (MALDI-TOF-MS) were measured on a Bruker autoflex III.


### 2.2.β-Carotene Bleaching Assay

Theβ-carotene bleaching assay was performed according to an optimally modified procedure [2, 3]. Chloroform solutions of 11 μL of β-carotene (1.0 mg/mL, 8.2 μM), 4.4 μL of linoleic acid (0.1 g/mL, 628 μM), and 22 μL of Tween 40 (0.2 g/mL) were mixed in a quartz cell equipped with a screw-on cap and then the solvent was removed in vacuo. The residual emulsion was immediately diluted with 2.4 mL of phosphate buffer solution (0.02 M, pH = 7.01), and 0.1 mL of antioxidant (0–20 μM) in deionized water (C60(OH)~24, 36, and 44) or DMSO (C60(OH)8, 12, and 26) was added to the diluted mixture. The solution was mixed well and heated at 50°C under air in a quartz cell on a UV spectrometer in order to monitor the decrease in the absorbance of β-carotene at 460 nm.


## 2.1. Materials and Apparatuses

Fullerenols C60(OH)n (n
=
44 and 36) were synthesized by the previously reported procedures using hydrogen peroxide [12, 13] and C60(OH)26 was synthesized by the modified method with a shorter reaction time (methods A and A′). Fullerenol C60(OH)~24 prepared from C60Br24 was purchased from MTR Ltd. (method B). Fullerenols C60(OH)n (n
=
12 and 8) were synthesized by the modification of the literature method using oleum (method C) [19]. Fullerene C60 was purchased from Frontier Carbon Corporation as nanom purple ST (99%).β-Carotene, linoleic acid (>99%), catechin mixture, isoflavone mixture, coenzyme Q10 (as ubiquinone-10), curcumin, and α-lipoic acid were purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. Other reagents and organic solvents as well as pure water were all commercially available and used as received. UV-visible spectra were measured on a JASCO V-550 equipped with a thermal controller. LCMS analysis was performed on a SHIMADZU LCMS-2010EV. Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectra (MALDI-TOF-MS) were measured on a Bruker autoflex III.


## 2.2.β-Carotene Bleaching Assay

Theβ-carotene bleaching assay was performed according to an optimally modified procedure [2, 3]. Chloroform solutions of 11 μL of β-carotene (1.0 mg/mL, 8.2 μM), 4.4 μL of linoleic acid (0.1 g/mL, 628 μM), and 22 μL of Tween 40 (0.2 g/mL) were mixed in a quartz cell equipped with a screw-on cap and then the solvent was removed in vacuo. The residual emulsion was immediately diluted with 2.4 mL of phosphate buffer solution (0.02 M, pH = 7.01), and 0.1 mL of antioxidant (0–20 μM) in deionized water (C60(OH)~24, 36, and 44) or DMSO (C60(OH)8, 12, and 26) was added to the diluted mixture. The solution was mixed well and heated at 50°C under air in a quartz cell on a UV spectrometer in order to monitor the decrease in the absorbance of β-carotene at 460 nm.


## 3. Results and Discussion

The discoloration rate in the presence of fullerene (R
f) is defined as (1), where k
obs is an observed pseudo-first-order rate constant, and k
c and k
f are rate constants for the reaction of β-carotene and fullerene with radical species (represented by LOO
∙), respectively. Because the concentration of radical species must be considerably low and if it is approximated as a constant, the rate obeys a pseudo-first-order rate law with a constant of k
obs. When fullerene is absent as a control (i.e., [fullerene] = 0), the discoloration rate of β-carotene is defined as R
0. Consider
(1)
R
f
=
-
d
[
β
-carotene
]
d
t
=
k
obs
[
β
-carotene
]
=
k
c
[
β
-carotene
]
×
(
k
c
[
β
-carotene
]
k
c
[
β
-carotene
]
+
k
f
[
fullerene
]
)
[
LOO
∙
]
.Theβ-carotene bleaching assay was carried out by previously reported method [2]. The decrease in absorbance of β-carotene is plotted as ln[(Abs0)/(Abst)] versus reaction time that gave a linear regression line after a short presteady state (Figure 2(a)), consistent with the above approximation of the reaction as a pseudo-first-order kinetics (1).(a) Time course of the discoloration ofβ-carotene induced by autoxidation of linoleic acid under air at 50°C in the absence (solid line for control) or the presence of fullerenols (dotted line for C60(OH)12 and dashed line for C60(OH)8 in 10 μM) by monitoring of UV absorbance at 460 nm. (b) Plots of the ratio of β-carotene bleaching (discoloration) rates in the presence (R
f) or absence (R
0) of fullerenol R
f/R
0 versus the ratio of concentration [fullerenol]/[β-carotene] for various fullerenols: marked by square for C60(OH)12, triangle for C60(OH)8, and circle for C60(OH)26. The slope of each linear regression line corresponds to the relative radical scavenging rate constant k
rel
⁡ of fullerenols relative to β-carotene (=k
f/k
c). The dotted horizontal line indicates the value in the absence of antioxidant as a control (R
f = R
0 at any concentration; k
rel
⁡ = 0).
(a)
(b)By the plot of discoloration rate ratioR
f
/
R
0 to the various molar ratio of [fullerene]/[β-carotene] as shown in Figure 2(b), the ratio of rate constants k
f/k
c, which means the relative reactivity of fullerene to β-carotene (defined as k
rel
⁡), can be obtained as the slope of a linear line with the intercept of 1 as expressed by
(2)
R
f
R
0
=
k
obs
of
fullerene
k
obs
of
control
=
k
c
[
β
-carotene
]
+
k
f
[
fullerene
]
k
c
[
β
-carotene
]
=
1
+
k
f
k
c
[
fullerene
]
[
β
-carotene
]
,
(
k
f
k
c
=
k
rel
⁡
)
.TheR
f
/
R
0 plots for C60(OH)8, C60(OH)12, and C60(OH)26 exhibited that the highest k
rel
⁡ value of 1.62 (i.e., 1.62 times reactive toward the present radical species relative to β-carotene) was observed for C60(OH)12. The k
rel
⁡ values as well as %AOA at 10 μM of various fullerenols were summarized in Table 1. The antioxidant activity expressed using %AOA was defined by (3). The fullerenols having higher k
rel
⁡ values showed higher values of %AOA. The %AOA is convenient to express the antioxidant activity using the value in the range from 0 (low) to 100 (high). However, it should be noted that the value of %AOA is concentration-dependent and the value of k
rel
⁡ is not. Consider
(3)
%
AOA
=
(
k
obs
of
control
)
-
(
k
obs
of
sample
)
k
obs
of
control
×
100
.Table 1
The relative rate constant (k
rel
⁡) and antioxidant activity (%AOA) of fullerenolsa.
Compound
Methodb
k
rel
⁡
%AOA at 10μM
C60(OH)44
A
1.54
66.0
C60(OH)36
A′
0.80
52.7
C60(OH)24
B
0.68
46.0
C60(OH)26
A′
0.31
31.7
C60(OH)12
C
1.62
70.1
C60(OH)8
C
1.24
62.8
C
60
c
[3]
0.79
50.0
aThe reaction was conducted in anoxic conditions.
bPreparation method described in Section 2.
cPVP was used as a water solubilizer.Fullerenols C60(OH)n having ca. 10 (n
=
8 and 12) or ca. 40 (36 and 44) hydroxyl groups showed somewhat high antioxidant activity as compared with those having ca. 25 (24 and 26). Lowly hydroxylated fullerene (ca. 10) showed high antioxidant activity probably because of the remaining relatively high π-conjugation in C=C double bonds, such as high HOMO and low LUMO, which is favourable for the efficient molecular orbital interaction with the radical SOMO. Therefore, the activity decreased with the increasing number of hydroxyl groups, thus decreasing π-conjugation, up to ca. 25. However, surprisingly, the activity again increased with the increasing number of hydroxyl groups up to ca. 40 as highly hydroxylated ones. The present result suggests that the antioxidant mechanism of highly hydroxylated fullerenes may be different from those of lowly hydroxylated ones (vide infra).For the comparison, the antioxidant activities of representative naturally occurring antioxidants measured by the same procedure were summarized in Table2 [18]. Catechin showed the extremely high k
rel
⁡ and %AOA values among those tested. Fullerenol C60(OH)44 also exhibited relatively high radical scavenging activity, slightly higher even than β-carotene, while curcumin and α-lipoic acid showed poor values in the present β-carotene bleaching assay.Table 2
The relative rate constant (k
rel
⁡) and antioxidant activity (%AOA) of naturally occurring antioxidantsa
,
b.
Compound
k
rel
⁡
%AOA at 10μM
Catechin
4.95
80.2
C60(OH)44
1.54
66.0
β-Carotene
1.00
—
Isoflavone
0.68
35.6
Coenzyme Q10
0.50
29.1
Curcumin
0.26
17.7
α-Lipoic acid
0.10
7.4
aThe reaction was conducted in anoxic conditions.
bData from [18].General antioxidants are mainly categorized into three types according to their antioxidant mechanism, such as (i) electron donating type (reductant like ascorbic acid), (ii) hydrogen donating type (antioxidant having reactive hydrogen atom like phenolic –OH group of catechin), and (iii) radical trapping type (antioxidant having highly conjugated C=C double bonds likeβ-carotene) [20]. To investigate the antioxidant mechanism of fullerene, the reaction of C60 with methyl linoleate (ML) under autoxidation condition [21], heating with 300 equivalent excess of ML in toluene at 70°C for 3 days, was conducted as a model reaction. Because of the technical problems on solubility and mass detectability, the employment of linoleic acid failed. Both by MALDI-TOF-MS and by LC-MS with APCI negative mode analyses of the crude reaction mixture, the peroxyl radical of methyl linoleate (MLOO
∙) was revealed to give fullerene multioxides (C60On) and their radical addition products [C60(O)n(OOML)m] along with their fragment peaks (Figures 3 and 4). This could be a part of evidence for a radical trap mechanism of fullerene C60. On the other hand, no peaks derived from MLOO
∙ were obtained in the reaction of C60(OH)8 with ML by mass and NMR spectroscopy. Although it failed to detect the product in this case, the disappearance of mass peaks corresponding to the starting C60(OH)8, which were observed before the reaction, implied that the fullerenol reacted with ML.Figure 3
Structure of methyl linoleate (ML) and its peroxyl radical (MLOO
∙).Mass spectra of the crude product on the reaction of C60 with an excess amount of methyl linoleate by heating under air.
(a)
(b)Instead of the failed mass analysis, the reaction product of fullerenol C60(OH)8 with ML was analysed by IR spectroscopy (Figure 5). Even after reprecipitation of the product from diethyl ether/hexane = 9/1 followed by Florisil column chromatography with an eluent of THF, the small peak at ca. 1700 cm−1 assigned for νC=O was observed along with the peaks at ca. 2900 cm−1 assigned for νC–H. These signals may appear by the addition of MLOO
∙ which has an ester moiety or by the hydrogen abstraction from hydroxyl group with the subsequent carbonyl group formation (vide infra).Figure 5
IR spectra of the crude product on the reaction of fullerenol C60(OH)8 with methyl linoleate (ML) under autoxidation condition along with those of the starting materials.By considering the above results, we proposed two possible radical scavenging mechanisms of fullerenols as shown in Figure6. One is “C-addition” type, which includes the peroxyl radical addition to a conjugated C=C double bond (mechanism A), and the other is “H-abstraction” type, which includes hydrogen atom abstraction from –OH group and the subsequent skeletal rearrangement of fullerenyl cage forming ether bridge (mechanism B). Lowly hydroxylated fullerenols C60(OH)n (n = ca. 10) which have enough π-conjugated double bonds probably favour the “C-addition” mechanism similar to the pristine C60. By contrast, highly hydroxylated fullerenols C60(OH)n (n = ca. 40) seem to be relatively difficult to undergo the C-addition of MLOO
∙ because they have less and unreactive double bonds in addition to the larger steric hindrance from the crowded hydroxyl groups. The latter mechanism is the same as catechin (polyphenol) type and it is supported by the fact that some fullerenols have acidic (similar to phenolic) hydroxyl groups. Because highly hydroxylated fullerenols have larger strain on fullerenyl cage due to the conversion of many sp2 carbons into sp3 carbons by hydroxylation, H-abstraction may be followed by the subsequent skeletal rearrangement on C60 cage to release the strain energy, forming some ether bridge. Fullerenols C60(OH)n (n = ca. 24) result in poor antioxidant activity probably due to the lack of both effects.Possible mechanisms for lipid peroxyl radical (LOO
∙) scavenging by fullerenols C60(OH)n: (a) addition to C=C double bonds for less hydroxylated fullerenes and (b) H-abstraction from –OH group for highly hydroxylated ones.
(a)
(b)Finally, we also measured the antioxidant activity of several alcohols and phenols. Under the same condition ofβ-carotene bleaching assay, ethanol,t-butyl alcohol, benzyl alcohol, allyl alcohol, phenol, andp-bromophenol did not show antioxidant activity in spite of the existence of hydroxyl groups and unsaturated structures. The result clearly suggests the importance of high conjugation and distorted structure of fullerenols for the antioxidant activity in β-carotene bleaching assay.


## 4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we systematically evaluated the antioxidant activity of variously hydroxylated fullerenols byβ-carotene bleaching assay. The antioxidant activity %AOA was varied from 32% to 70% by changing the number of hydroxyl groups and both lowly hydroxylated C60(OH)12 (70.1%) and highly hydroxylated C60(OH)44 (66.0%) showed relatively high antioxidant activity. The obtained relative radical scavenging rate of fullerene k
rel
⁡ toward radical species derived from linoleic acid under autoxidation condition indicated that these fullerenols reacted 1.62 and 1.54 times faster than β-carotene, respectively. By the product analysis using the model reaction of C60 and methyl linoleate under autoxidation condition, we detected several mass peaks of radical scavenged fullerene derivatives as well as the IR spectra. These results suggest that the high π-conjugation and the strained structure of fullerenol are responsible for the high radical scavenging reactivity and thus we proposed two possible antioxidant mechanisms, such as C-addition type and H-abstraction type, which are dependent on the number of hydroxyl groups.



---

*Source: 802596-2014-08-28.xml*