# A Novel Dual-Band “C+O” Structure Antenna

Authors: Tangyao Xie; Jianguo Yu; Ziheng Lin; Yao Li; Guodong Zhang; Zhen Yu
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

This article proposes a novel multiband antenna with “C + O” structure, which uses two classic circular letters and combines them. The antenna is suitable for wireless applications such as second generation (2G), third generation (3G), fourth generation (4G), WLAN, and Bluetooth. The antenna is based on the structural characteristics of the classic monopole antenna. It is a vertical quarter-wavelength antenna. The radiator of the antenna is mainly composed of letters, and the radiator is symmetrical along the feeder line. The antenna radiator is composed of “C + O” structure. The antenna uses a coplanar waveguide feeding method. After actual testing, the antenna covers two frequency bands: 1.82–2.66 GHz and 3.46–3.72 GHz. The center frequency points are 2.06 GHz and 3.68 GHz. The antenna uses FR-4 dielectric material, the relative dielectric constant of the dielectric plate is 4.4, and the actual size of the antenna is 15 × 15 × 1.6 mm³. The test and simulation have good consistency, which verifies that the proposed antenna meets the requirements of various wireless applications.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

With the rapid development of wireless mobile devices and the wide application of array antennas, miniaturization and ultrathinness of antennas have become a development trend in recent years. The requirements for miniaturization, multifrequency bands, low cost, and easy integration and loading of the unit antennas in the array are becoming higher and higher. Traditional antennas are difficult to be widely used in arrays and mobile terminals due to the limitations of self-generation [1]. The miniaturization and multifunctionalization of the current communication equipment requires the built-in antenna to have strong integration capabilities and multiband characteristics [2, 3]. The array antenna also needs to meet these requirements [4, 5].In recent years, in order to meet the requirements of multiple frequency bands and miniaturization, antenna design can go through multiple iterations to improve its performance. For example, an antenna design similar to the fractal iteration of Chinese classical coins fills up the space through multiple iterations of square and circle, changing the characteristics of current and radiation, so as to obtain good return loss and antenna efficiency [6]. There is also a Koch snowflake fractal to realize the multiband of the antenna [7, 8]. The multifrequency band of the antenna can also be realized by adding branches of the radiator. The effect of increasing the current path is achieved by increasing the branches of the radiator. For example, the banana leaf structure antenna uses leaf veins as the radiator to make the current flow through different leaf veins to achieve multifrequency effects [9]. Two Y-shaped strips are coupled to each other to obtain dual frequency bands. The upward Y-shaped strip provides 3.56 GHz, and the downward Y-shaped strip provides 4.63 GHz. The antenna in the literature covers the two frequency bands of WLAN and WiMAX as a whole [10]. There was an ultra-wideband antenna that can use formulas to plan the upper and lower lobes of the blade and then scale it down for fractal iteration [11]. The antenna in this article is implemented by introducing a hexagonal open resonant ring into the radiation element to achieve three frequency bands. Each frequency band can be of independent control [12]. The resonant frequency of each frequency band can be controlled by changing the length of the antenna radiator branch, and formula (1) can be used to extract the specific length of the antenna [13, 14].(1)l=c4f0εeff.In addition to adding branches of the antenna radiator to increase current flow, the antenna can also add a slot in the radiator to increase the current path. The antenna radiator is grooved with reference to the classical Chinese reciprocal pattern structure, and the required frequency band is obtained by calculating the length and width of the groove [15]. The local current mode is changed on the antenna radiator to produce different resonant frequencies [16]. It can be understood from this article that the tapered structure can effectively increase the bandwidth and improve the impedance matching of the antenna and the antenna can be cut in half to achieve miniaturization [17]. Not only that, there are many ways to achieve multiband antennas, including coupling feed technology [18–21], matching network technology [22, 23], and distributed inductive loading technology [24, 25].At present, the research on new antenna technology has been initially mature at home and abroad. According to the mutual combination of letters to form a complex and changeable structure, it has important research value for the design and realization of multiband and miniaturized antennas. This article combines “C” and “O,” which greatly reduces the overall size of the antenna. The size of the antenna is 15∗15∗1.6 mm³, which can be used for multiband mobile terminals. The antenna covers several commercial frequency bands: TD-SCDMA (1,880–2,025 MHz), WCDMA (1,920–2,170 MHz), CDMA2000 (1,920–2,125 MHz), LTE33-41 (1.9–2.69 GHz), Bluetooth (2,400–2,483.5 MHz), GPS (L1, L4), BDS (B1), GLONSS (L1), GALILEO (E1, E2), WLAN (802.11 b/g/n: 2.4–2.48 GHz), (802.11a/n: 5.15–5.35 GHz), LTE42/43 (3.4–3.8 GHz), and WiMAX (3.3–3.8 GHz) systems.


## 2. Antenna Structure and Design Procedure

### 2.1. Characteristics of the Antenna Structure

The length and width of the radiator are calculated according to well-known mathematical equations:(2)f=c2Lεr,where L is the length of the antenna radiator, f is the center frequency of the antenna during operation, c is the speed of light in free space (3 × 108 m/s), and εr is the dielectric constant of the dielectric plate.The structure and parameters of the antenna are shown in Figure1, and the size table is shown in Table 1. The antenna is inspired by the Latin letters “C” and “O,” and the radiator is transformed into a monopole antenna formed by nesting and combining two letters. The feed line of 50 Ω resistance is connected to the rectangular ground, and the feed mode of the coplanar waveguide is adopted. The antenna adopts the substrate FR-4 material, the thickness is 1.6 mm, the relative dielectric constant is 4.4, and the loss tangent is 0.02.Figure 1
“C + O” structure antenna model.Table 1
Antenna parameters.
Size parametersWsLsWdLdW1L1unit (mm)3030413.51.01715Size parametersL2R1R2abhunit (mm)24620.51.6


## 2.1. Characteristics of the Antenna Structure

The length and width of the radiator are calculated according to well-known mathematical equations:(2)f=c2Lεr,where L is the length of the antenna radiator, f is the center frequency of the antenna during operation, c is the speed of light in free space (3 × 108 m/s), and εr is the dielectric constant of the dielectric plate.The structure and parameters of the antenna are shown in Figure1, and the size table is shown in Table 1. The antenna is inspired by the Latin letters “C” and “O,” and the radiator is transformed into a monopole antenna formed by nesting and combining two letters. The feed line of 50 Ω resistance is connected to the rectangular ground, and the feed mode of the coplanar waveguide is adopted. The antenna adopts the substrate FR-4 material, the thickness is 1.6 mm, the relative dielectric constant is 4.4, and the loss tangent is 0.02.Figure 1
“C + O” structure antenna model.Table 1
Antenna parameters.
Size parametersWsLsWdLdW1L1unit (mm)3030413.51.01715Size parametersL2R1R2abhunit (mm)24620.51.6


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Simulation Results

The simulation was performed using the Ansoft High-Frequency Simulation Software (HFSS) (version 18.0). Figure 2(a) illustrates a monopole antenna with a symmetrical “C” letter structure. The antenna produces one frequency band, namely, 2.1 GHz. Figure 2(a) shows a symmetrical monopole antenna. The antenna radiation pattern consists of the Latin letter “O.” The antenna generates two frequency bands, namely, 2.3 and 3.58 GHz. The abovementioned four parameters were optimised and analysed in order to obtain an antenna return loss performance suitable for the applicable ranges of GPS, WLAN, LTE, and other commercial frequency bands.Figure 2
“C + O” model evolution process diagram.As shown in Figure3, the proposed antenna can work in two different frequency bands; the center frequency points are 2.3 and 3.58 GHz, and the corresponding return losses are −19.1 and −27.5 dB. The simulated −10 dB return loss bandwidth is 35% for the first frequency band (1.81–2.75 GHz) and 6% for the last band (3.48–3.78 GHz). These frequency bands cover the commercial frequency bands, such as GPS, WLAN, LTE, WiMAX, Bluetooth, and satellite communications (see Table 2).Figure 3
Combined simulated return loss for antenna evolutions.Table 2
Measured and simulated frequency band comparison of the antenna.
SimulationMeasurementCoverage frequency band11.81–2.75 GHz (42.7%)1.82–2.66 GHz (40.8%)TD-SCDMA (1,880–2,025 MHz), WCDMA (1,920–2,170 MHz), CDMA2000 (1,920–2,125 MHz), LTE33-41 (1.9–2.69 GHz), Bluetooth (2,400–2,483.5 MHz), GPS (L1, L4), BDS (B1), GLONSS (L1), GALILEO (E1, E2), WLAN (802.11 b/g/n: 2.4–2.48 GHz), (802.11a/n: 5.15–5.35 GHz), LTE42/43 (3.4–3.8 GHz), and WiMAX (3.3–3.8 GHz)23.48–3.78 GHz (8.3%)3.46–3.72 GHz (7.1%)The surface current distribution diagram and current vector distribution diagram of the antenna radiator at the center frequencies of 2.3 and 3.58 GHz are shown in Figures4(a)–4(b). When the antenna is working at 2.3 GHz, the antenna current is mainly distributed in the lower half of “C” and a small part of the current is concentrated in the upper half. When the antenna works at 3.58 GHz, the current of the antenna is mainly concentrated on the entire “C” structure. Therefore, the length of the radiator that caused the first resonance can be calculated as(3)La≈2πR22+2πR23=31.4mm.Figure 4
Current amplitude and vector distribution of the antenna. (a) 2.3 GHz. (b) 3.58 GHz.
(a)(b)According to the data in Table1, L = 10 mm can be obtained, which can be used to calculate the frequency band corresponding to this length:(4)fa=c2Laεr≈2.285GHz.It can be seen from Figure4(b) that when the antenna is at 3.58 GHz, the current is mainly concentrated on the outer ring, which can verify the correspondence between the length of the antenna radiator and the antenna resonance point:(5)Lb≈2πR2−4L2−2πR25=22.01mm,(6)fb=c2Lbεr≈3.26GHz.The 3D radiation pattern of the antenna and the cross polarization in the E/H-plane are shown in Figures5 and 6. The 3D gain graph and the cross polarization in the E/H-plane obtained by the simulation are shown in Figures 5 and 6. The blue dashed line represents the main polarization when Phi = 90°, and the blue solid line represents the cross polarization when Phi = 90°. The red solid line represents the main polarization when Phi = 0°, and the red dashed line represents the cross polarization when Phi = 0°. At the center frequencies of 2.3 GHz and 3.58 GHz, the antenna gains are -4.37dBi and 1.04dBi, respectively. It can be clearly seen that the antenna maintains a good radiation characteristic in the available frequency band, the omnidirectionality of the E plane and the H plane is good, and there is almost no zero point. The antenna has a small cross polarization characteristic.Figure 5
3D radiation patterns. (a) 2.3 GHz. (b) 3.58 GHz.
(a)(b)Figure 6
E/H-plane radiation patterns. (a) 2.3 GHz. (b) 3.58 GHz.
(a)(b)


### 3.2. Fabrication and Measurement Results

The antenna is designed on an FR-4 substrate with a thickness of 1.6 mm and loss tangent of 0.02, and a 30μm thick copper layer is engraved on both sides. A prototype was manufactured and measured, and the measurement was performed in a microwave anechoic chamber with a shielding effect of 100 MHz–9 GHz≥100 dB at 6000 × 3200 × 3200 mm to verify the broadband performance of the multifrequency planar antenna. The measured and simulated antenna is located at the −10 dB return loss band, as shown in Figure 7. The antenna's return loss frequency band at -10 dB has two frequency bands: 1.82–2.66 GHz (40.8%) and 3.46–3.72 GHz (7.1%). The generated frequency band can cover 2G, 3G, and 4G mobile communication systems, as well as wireless applications, such as Bluetooth and satellite navigation. The bandwidth of −10 dB return loss is roughly identical to the simulation frequency band, as shown in Table 2. Comparing the antenna test and simulation results, the actual test results cover more frequency bands and have a wider bandwidth. The return loss performance is in good agreement.Figure 7
Measurement and simulation S11 of the antenna.Figures8 and 9 show the measured 3D radiation pattern and the radiation pattern of the E/H-plane when the antenna is at 2.3 GHz and 3.58 GHz. It can be obtained by comparison with simulation data that the antenna has good omnidirectional radiation. As the frequency increases, the side lobes of the antenna gradually appear, but there is no zero point. Due to the manufacturing accuracy, dielectric material, and environmental elements in the antenna manufacturing process, there are still some errors. The final test results are in good agreement with the simulation data. The gain and efficiency of the antenna tested at 0.5–4.5 GHz are shown in Figure 10. The gain of the antenna in the usable frequency band of 1.78–3.80 GHz varies between 1.1 and 4.81 dBi, and the efficiency varies around 49%.Figure 8
Measurement 3D radiation pattern of the antenna. (a) 2.3 GHz. (b) 3.58 GHz.
(a)(b)Figure 9
E/H-plane radiation patterns. (a) 2.3 GHz. (b) 3.58 GHz.
(a)(b)Figure 10
Measured gain and efficiency curves.


## 3.1. Simulation Results

The simulation was performed using the Ansoft High-Frequency Simulation Software (HFSS) (version 18.0). Figure 2(a) illustrates a monopole antenna with a symmetrical “C” letter structure. The antenna produces one frequency band, namely, 2.1 GHz. Figure 2(a) shows a symmetrical monopole antenna. The antenna radiation pattern consists of the Latin letter “O.” The antenna generates two frequency bands, namely, 2.3 and 3.58 GHz. The abovementioned four parameters were optimised and analysed in order to obtain an antenna return loss performance suitable for the applicable ranges of GPS, WLAN, LTE, and other commercial frequency bands.Figure 2
“C + O” model evolution process diagram.As shown in Figure3, the proposed antenna can work in two different frequency bands; the center frequency points are 2.3 and 3.58 GHz, and the corresponding return losses are −19.1 and −27.5 dB. The simulated −10 dB return loss bandwidth is 35% for the first frequency band (1.81–2.75 GHz) and 6% for the last band (3.48–3.78 GHz). These frequency bands cover the commercial frequency bands, such as GPS, WLAN, LTE, WiMAX, Bluetooth, and satellite communications (see Table 2).Figure 3
Combined simulated return loss for antenna evolutions.Table 2
Measured and simulated frequency band comparison of the antenna.
SimulationMeasurementCoverage frequency band11.81–2.75 GHz (42.7%)1.82–2.66 GHz (40.8%)TD-SCDMA (1,880–2,025 MHz), WCDMA (1,920–2,170 MHz), CDMA2000 (1,920–2,125 MHz), LTE33-41 (1.9–2.69 GHz), Bluetooth (2,400–2,483.5 MHz), GPS (L1, L4), BDS (B1), GLONSS (L1), GALILEO (E1, E2), WLAN (802.11 b/g/n: 2.4–2.48 GHz), (802.11a/n: 5.15–5.35 GHz), LTE42/43 (3.4–3.8 GHz), and WiMAX (3.3–3.8 GHz)23.48–3.78 GHz (8.3%)3.46–3.72 GHz (7.1%)The surface current distribution diagram and current vector distribution diagram of the antenna radiator at the center frequencies of 2.3 and 3.58 GHz are shown in Figures4(a)–4(b). When the antenna is working at 2.3 GHz, the antenna current is mainly distributed in the lower half of “C” and a small part of the current is concentrated in the upper half. When the antenna works at 3.58 GHz, the current of the antenna is mainly concentrated on the entire “C” structure. Therefore, the length of the radiator that caused the first resonance can be calculated as(3)La≈2πR22+2πR23=31.4mm.Figure 4
Current amplitude and vector distribution of the antenna. (a) 2.3 GHz. (b) 3.58 GHz.
(a)(b)According to the data in Table1, L = 10 mm can be obtained, which can be used to calculate the frequency band corresponding to this length:(4)fa=c2Laεr≈2.285GHz.It can be seen from Figure4(b) that when the antenna is at 3.58 GHz, the current is mainly concentrated on the outer ring, which can verify the correspondence between the length of the antenna radiator and the antenna resonance point:(5)Lb≈2πR2−4L2−2πR25=22.01mm,(6)fb=c2Lbεr≈3.26GHz.The 3D radiation pattern of the antenna and the cross polarization in the E/H-plane are shown in Figures5 and 6. The 3D gain graph and the cross polarization in the E/H-plane obtained by the simulation are shown in Figures 5 and 6. The blue dashed line represents the main polarization when Phi = 90°, and the blue solid line represents the cross polarization when Phi = 90°. The red solid line represents the main polarization when Phi = 0°, and the red dashed line represents the cross polarization when Phi = 0°. At the center frequencies of 2.3 GHz and 3.58 GHz, the antenna gains are -4.37dBi and 1.04dBi, respectively. It can be clearly seen that the antenna maintains a good radiation characteristic in the available frequency band, the omnidirectionality of the E plane and the H plane is good, and there is almost no zero point. The antenna has a small cross polarization characteristic.Figure 5
3D radiation patterns. (a) 2.3 GHz. (b) 3.58 GHz.
(a)(b)Figure 6
E/H-plane radiation patterns. (a) 2.3 GHz. (b) 3.58 GHz.
(a)(b)


## 3.2. Fabrication and Measurement Results

The antenna is designed on an FR-4 substrate with a thickness of 1.6 mm and loss tangent of 0.02, and a 30μm thick copper layer is engraved on both sides. A prototype was manufactured and measured, and the measurement was performed in a microwave anechoic chamber with a shielding effect of 100 MHz–9 GHz≥100 dB at 6000 × 3200 × 3200 mm to verify the broadband performance of the multifrequency planar antenna. The measured and simulated antenna is located at the −10 dB return loss band, as shown in Figure 7. The antenna's return loss frequency band at -10 dB has two frequency bands: 1.82–2.66 GHz (40.8%) and 3.46–3.72 GHz (7.1%). The generated frequency band can cover 2G, 3G, and 4G mobile communication systems, as well as wireless applications, such as Bluetooth and satellite navigation. The bandwidth of −10 dB return loss is roughly identical to the simulation frequency band, as shown in Table 2. Comparing the antenna test and simulation results, the actual test results cover more frequency bands and have a wider bandwidth. The return loss performance is in good agreement.Figure 7
Measurement and simulation S11 of the antenna.Figures8 and 9 show the measured 3D radiation pattern and the radiation pattern of the E/H-plane when the antenna is at 2.3 GHz and 3.58 GHz. It can be obtained by comparison with simulation data that the antenna has good omnidirectional radiation. As the frequency increases, the side lobes of the antenna gradually appear, but there is no zero point. Due to the manufacturing accuracy, dielectric material, and environmental elements in the antenna manufacturing process, there are still some errors. The final test results are in good agreement with the simulation data. The gain and efficiency of the antenna tested at 0.5–4.5 GHz are shown in Figure 10. The gain of the antenna in the usable frequency band of 1.78–3.80 GHz varies between 1.1 and 4.81 dBi, and the efficiency varies around 49%.Figure 8
Measurement 3D radiation pattern of the antenna. (a) 2.3 GHz. (b) 3.58 GHz.
(a)(b)Figure 9
E/H-plane radiation patterns. (a) 2.3 GHz. (b) 3.58 GHz.
(a)(b)Figure 10
Measured gain and efficiency curves.


## 4. Conclusions

In this article, a small multiband antenna with a classic letter structure is developed, the size of which is only 15 × 15 × 1.6 mm³. The final frequency band and bandwidth of the antenna are 1.82–2.66 GHz (40.8%) and 3.46–3.72 GHz (7.1%). This covers multiple commercial frequency bands such as DCS, WLAN, Bluetooth, and LTE. The radiation direction of the antenna is omnidirectional, and the simulation and actual measurement have good consistency, which verifies the good radiation characteristics of the antenna. Because the antenna is small in size and light in weight, it can make some reference for the research of the element antenna in the array antenna.



---

*Source: 7974349-2021-11-24.xml*