# The Influence of Rotating Direction on the Tribological Behavior of Grey Cast Iron with Curve Distributed Pit Textured Surface

Authors: Shaoni Sun; Liyang Xie; Peter Kelly; Risheng Long; Manhong Li; Jiling Feng
Journal: Mathematical Problems in Engineering
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

To investigate the influence of surface features, in the form of pits, on the wear resistance of grey cast iron (GCI), a finite element model of the pin-on-disc friction system, with pits distributed in a curved radial direction, was developed using APDL programming and the tribological behavior of textured surfaces was studied. The influence of relative rotation direction between the disc and the pin on the thermal behavior of the friction system under dry wear conditions was researched. GCI and C30E steel samples with pit textured surfaces were manufactured using laser marking equipment and tested using a tribology wear testing rig. The mass losses were measured and the worn surfaces were characterized. The influence of different rotation directions on the tribological behavior of the pit textured surfaces was also investigated. The simulation and test results revealed that rotation direction was a crucial parameter in determining the tribological behavior of surfaces with these features, regardless of the material. Under the conditions tested, when the pin rotated anticlockwise, the samples showed better friction and wear behavior than when the pin rotated clockwise. These results can provide important guidance for the optimization of the design of heavy-load brake systems and other similar applications.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Owing to its low cost, good damping property, fine castability, and machinability, grey cast iron (GCI) is widely used in many fields, such as machine tools (base and guideways), vehicle engines (shell and cylinders), reduction gearboxes (shell), and brake discs of trains [1]. The wear resistance of GCI is a very important index in choosing this material for these applications and directly affects the service life of the whole system, especially under dry wear condition [2]. Therefore, it is of great significance to investigate feasible means of improving the wear resistance of GCI parts under dry sliding conditions.Surface texturing is one of the main methods to control friction, improve the reliability, and prolong the service life of mechanical parts in sliding wear applications [3–8]. The surface patterns, such as “pit or spot,” “groove or striation,” and “grid or lattice,” may be inspired by the natural flora and fauna [9, 10] or regularly distributed features [11–13], isotropic or anisotropic [14–19]. “Stick-slip” friction phenomena can be observed during sliding, depending on the surface topological pattern. To improve the wear resistance of mechanical parts, great efforts have been theoretically and experimentally made to investigate the orientation effects between frictional motion direction and surface texture units or patterns, on the tribological behavior under different lubrication conditions [18–23]. Yuan et al. [20] studied the orientation effects of grooves on the friction performance. The results indicated that grooves perpendicular or parallel to the sliding direction had a strong impact on the friction performance of sliding surfaces, and the merits of perpendicular or parallel orientation might swap under different contact conditions. Costa and Hutchings [21] fabricated regularly distributed micro-dimples and grooves on the surface of moulds through photochemical technology and found that when a high density (about 25%) of grooves was perpendicular to the direction of motion, the friction coefficient could be reduced by a great degree under oil lubrication. If the grooves were parallel to the motion direction, the friction coefficient increased, with poor wear resistance. Pettersson and Jacobson [22] researched the effect of the angle of the groove on the tribological behavior using a ball-on-disc friction testing machine under boundary lubrication conditions. The results showed that when the grooves were parallel with the direction of movement, the friction force and wear loss were much larger than when the grooves were perpendicular to the direction of motion. The Japanese Toyama University and Toyama Industrial Technology Center [23] processed regularly distributed micro- and nanogrooves on the rake surface of cutting tools by femtosecond laser machining (see Figure 1). The experimental data from actual machining processes of aluminum alloys using these tools revealed that surface texture could effectively reduce the cutting force by decreasing the friction force on the flank face of tools, especially when the grooves were perpendicular to the flow direction of the metal chippings. Therefore, the direction of motion is of great significance for textured surfaces, which will induce different tribological behavior in different directions. The above findings are mainly from experimental studies, and there are few publications studying the friction and wear behavior of GCI parts with curve distributed pit textured surfaces, especially through numerical simulation methods.Figure 1
Different grooves on the cutting tools processed by laser machining [23].
(a)
Horizontal
(b)
Vertical
(c)
RectangleBased on previous research on the thermal behavior of a pin-on-disc friction system, where pits were distributed in the linear radial direction (LDRD) on the upper surface of the disc (see Figure2(a)) [24], a new finite element model with curve distributed pits in the radial direction (CDRD) (see Figure 2(b)) was established through APDL (ANSYS parametric design language) programming in this work. The influence of the rotation direction of the pin on the thermal behavior of the pin-on-disc system was investigated. In parallel, wear tests of GCI and C30E steel specimens with pit surfaces prepared by a laser marking machine were carried out using a tribology wear testing rig at Manchester Metropolitan University (MMU). The friction coefficient curves and mass losses of the samples were obtained, and the morphologies of the worn surfaces were characterized by stereo optical microscopy.Figure 2
Diagram of LDRD and CDRD surfaces.
(a)
LDRD
(b)
CDRD


## 2. Design of Pit Textured Surfaces

The pit textured discs, fabricated from GCI, were dimensioned for the pin-on-disc wear tester, that is, outer diameter,Φ54 mm, and inner diameter, Φ38 mm, with a thickness of 10 mm (see Figure 3). The size of the pin was Φ4.8 mm × 12.7 mm, manufactured from H13 tool steel. The thermal physical properties of GCI and H13 tool steel are both listed in Table 1.Table 1
Thermal physical properties of GCI and H13 tool steel.
Thermal physical parameter
GCI
H13 tool steel
Thermal conductivity,Ke, W/(m⋅K)
48
32.2
Density,ρ, kg/m3
7200
7800
Specific heat capacity,c, J/(kg⋅K)
480
460
Thermal expansion coefficient,α, ×10−5 K−1
1.2
0.91
Elastic modulus,E, Gpa
120
210
Poisson ratio,ν
0.25
0.30Figure 3
Sketch of the pit textured pin-on-disc friction system.The design of the textured surfaces is the basis of this work. As shown in Figure3, the main parameters of the pit textured surfaces include diameter of pit (DAOP), depth of pit (DPOP), radial spacing of adjacent pits (RSAP), number of pit sets (NPS), initial deflection angle of the first pit (IDAFP), and deflection angle of adjacent pits (DAAP). The optimal surface texture parameters obtained in previous research were used, that is, the DAOP, 0.8 mm, and the DPOP, 1.0 mm [24]. Other parameters were set to RSAP, 2 mm; the IDAFP, 30°; and DAAP, 10°. Evidently, as shown in the figure, there are nine groups of uniformly distributed pits in total, and each set includes four pits. The diameter of the circle, which passes through the center of the innermost pit in each group is Φ42 mm. The positions of the other pits are determined by the RSAP, IDAFP, and DAAP values.


## 3. Simulation and Results Discussion

Friction and wear is a thermodynamically nonequilibrium process. The drastic variations of temperature may cause phase transitions of metal in the near surface region and further affect the tribological behavior. Therefore, to determine the thermal behavior of the pin-on-disc friction system in different rotation directions, in relation to the pin locations, and further study the influence of this parameter on the tribological properties of the pit textured surfaces, the following work was undertaken through the APDL programming.


### 3.1. Thermodynamics Theory and Conditions

For certain conditions, the heat conduction during friction processes can be described by the classical heat conduction equation. If we setke=ke1+ke2, c=c1+c2, and ρ=ρ1+ρ2 and take heat convection and heat radiation into account, the classical heat conduction equation can be expressed as the following in the Cartesian coordinate system:(1)ke∂2T∂x2+∂2T∂y2+∂2T∂z2+q+hT-Th+σεT4-Th4=ρ·c∂T∂t,where ke is the thermal conductivity of friction system, c is the specific heat capacity of friction system, q is the heat flux through the contact area, ρ is the density of friction system, h is the convective heat transfer coefficient, Th is the ambient temperature, σ is the radiation constant of a blackbody, and ε is the radiation rate of the actual object.To solve (1), the initial condition and boundary conditions are necessary. In this work, the initial condition is the original temperature of the pin-on-disc system at the beginning of the simulation, equal to 20°C. The boundary condition is the heat exchange condition between the outer surface of the pin-on-disc system and its surrounding environment. Generally, the boundary conditions can be classified into the following four kinds.The first boundary condition is the boundary temperature of objects, a known constant or function of position and time. It can be given as(2)TS=TSorTS=TSx,y,z,t,where S is the boundary of the pin-on-disc friction system.The second boundary condition refers to the heat flux,qw, at the boundary of the objects, which is a known constant or also a function of position and time. For pin-on-disc friction systems, it can be expressed as(3)-kT∂T∂n⃑S=qwor-kT∂T∂n⃑S=qwx,y,z,tqwx,y,z,t=η·μ·P·vx,y,z,t,where qw is the heat flux through the contact surface of the pin-on-disc system, a known constant; qw(x,y,z,t) is the expression of input heat flux, a function of position and time; η is the conversion efficiency, 0.85; μ is the friction coefficient of the system, 0.38; P is the normal pressure of the pin; v(x,y,z,t) is the relative linear velocity between disc and pin. Meanwhile, the lower surface of the disc can be regarded as being in the adiabatic state, whose boundary condition can be written as(4)-ke∂T∂z=0.The third boundary condition is the heat transfer coefficient of the medium in the surrounding environment. The most commonly used one is the mixed convection and radiation heat transfer boundary condition, which can be displayed as(5)-kT∂T∂n⃑S=hTS-Te+σεTS4-Te4,where σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant; ε is the radiation rate of the pin-on-disc system.The fourth boundary condition is the heat conduction between the disc and the pin and can be expressed as(6)-λn∂T∂nS=βTS-Te,where TS is the temperature of the disc or pin, Te is the temperature of the environment, and β is the heat transfer coefficient between the disc and the pin.For pin-on-disc friction system, the temperature distribution in the disc or the pin is very uneven during dry wear processes. As a result, a huge temperature gradient exists in the disc, which further induces high thermal stresses. Thus, the thermal strain is composed of two parts: one is caused by temperature variation, and the other is caused by stress.


### 3.2. Modelling and Setting

The contact surface between the pit textured disc and the pin was set as a friction pair, wherein the upper surface of the disc was the “target surface,” while the lower surface of the pin was the “contact surface” (see Figure3). During the simulation process, both faces were always kept in contact with each other under a vertical force of 70 N, equivalent to a pressure of approximately 0.98 MPa. As shown in Figure 3, to intuitively display the relative positions of the disc and pin, the disc was constricted in all DOFs based on the equivalent principle in the whole simulation. Conversely, an angular velocity of 25 rad/s (about 200 RPM) was applied to the pin, which could rotate anticlockwise or clockwise, respectively. In consideration of the performance of the computer used, the duration of the simulation was set to 0.5 s (100 substeps, i.e., 0.005 seconds per substep); thus it is only the heat conduction of the immediate friction interface that was considered during the simulation.The element type used in this work includes SOLID226, TARGE170, CONTA174, and MPC184. The number of elements is 40962. To easily understand and compare the obtained data, as shown in Figure3, two typical nodes, node 1 and node 2, were selected to demonstrate the thermal behavior of the pit textured surface in different rotation directions. Specifically, node 1 was on the upper surface of the disc, located at the middle of the initial contact face between the disc and the pin. Node 2 was also on the upper surface of the disc but rotated by 90 degrees anticlockwise.


### 3.3. Results and Discussion

#### 3.3.1. Temperature Behavior of the Textured Surfaces

Figure4 shows the temperature contours of the pin-on-disc system for different rotation directions at the end of the simulation. As demonstrated in the figure, when the pin rotated anticlockwise, the heat affected region of the textured disc was larger than the affected area as the pin rotated in the contradirection. Furthermore, there was an evident uneven temperature phenomenon, which appeared on the pit textured surface that might be caused by the former mentioned “stick-slip friction,” whether the pin rotated in the clockwise or anticlockwise direction. This phenomenon could be called “temperature crawling” and was more obvious when the pin rotated clockwise.Figure 4
Temperature contours of pit textured surfaces after 0.5 s in different rotation directions.
(a)
Pin rotated anticlockwise
(b)
Pin rotated clockwiseFigure5 displays the temperature-time curves of node 1 and node 2 when the pin rotates in different directions. As shown in Figure 5(a), the temperature of node 1 gradually increased at the outset of the simulation, whether the pin rotated clockwise or anticlockwise. Both of the two curves were similar and had three obvious peaks at the 0.13 s, 0.25 s, and 0.38 s, respectively, corresponding to each moment where the pin passed over the node. Clearly, when the pin rotated anticlockwise, the average temperature of node 1 was lower than the temperature as the pin rotated in the clockwise direction, except for the first peak at 0.13 s. The temperatures of node 1 in the two rotation directions at 0.25 s were 20.4°C and 23.6°C, respectively, which equated to a temperature difference of 15.7%. The temperature difference of node 1 at 0.38 s was about 20.1%, the highest of the three peaks. For node 2, the two temperature-time curves, when the pin rotated clockwise and anticlockwise, also exhibited slow upward trends, with three peaks (see Figure 5(b)). It is evident that when the pin rotated in the anticlockwise direction, the average temperature of node 2 was also lower than the temperature when the pin rotated in the contradirection.Figure 5
Temperature-time curves of node 1 and node 2 in different rotation directions.
(a)
Node 1
(b)
Node 2By comparing Figures4 and 5, whether from the curves or contours, it is apparent that when the pin rotated anticlockwise, the pit textured surface exhibited slightly lower temperatures than when the pin rotated clockwise during the whole simulation, indicating a lower rate of temperature rise. Based on the relationship between temperature and friction and wear performance, under the same loading parameters and duration of simulation, the textured surface with the lower temperature rise would also be expected to show a lower friction coefficient and better wear resistance.


#### 3.3.2. Thermal Stress Behavior of the Textured Surface

Figure6 displays thevon Mises stress contours of the pit textured surfaces in different rotation directions at the end of the simulation. As shown in the figure, for both rotation directions, the highvon Mises stress region was always located at the inner ring of the disc, because of the displacement constraint in all DOFs during the simulation, and extended towards the pit groups. Meanwhile, thevon Mises stress around the pits group was lower than the stresses in the smooth area without pits (see the enlarged view of Figure 7). The highestvon Mises stress region of the textured surface was the area that the pin had just passed over. By analyzing the simulation results, it is obvious that (1) the pit textured structure has an adjusting effect on the stress distribution of the whole disc and (2) the relative rotation direction between disc and pin can also alter the thermal stress behavior of the textured surface.Figure 6
Thevon Mises stress contours of pit textured surfaces in different rotation directions.
(a)
Pin rotated anticlockwise
(b)
Pin rotated clockwiseFigure 7
Enlarged contour of lowvon Mises stress region around the pit set.Figure8(a) shows thevon Mises stress-time curves of node 1 when the pin rotated in two different directions. Obviously, both of the curves fluctuated periodically, and thevon Mises stress decreased firstly and then increased, showing an upward trend on the whole. In general, when the pin rotated anticlockwise, the averagevon Mises stress of node 1 was smaller than the stress when the pin rotated in the contradirection. Figure 8(b) demonstrates thevon Mises stress-time curves of node 2 in different rotation directions. The two curves showed similar shapes, with the same downward trends and fixed time-lag. Evidently, when the pin rotated anticlockwise, thevon Mises stress variation of node 2 and its average value were all less than the stresses when the pin rotated clockwise.Figure 8
Thevon Mises stress-time curves of node 1 and node 2 in different rotation directions.
(a)
Node 1
(b)
Node 2By comparing temperature andvon Misesstress data in Figures 4–8, it is evident that the rotating direction of pin has an effect on the thermal behavior of pit textured surfaces. The temperature and stress of the contact surface can directly affect the friction properties of the textured surface, change the friction coefficient during friction process, and finally induce variations in tribological properties of the whole pin-on-disc system.


## 3.1. Thermodynamics Theory and Conditions

For certain conditions, the heat conduction during friction processes can be described by the classical heat conduction equation. If we setke=ke1+ke2, c=c1+c2, and ρ=ρ1+ρ2 and take heat convection and heat radiation into account, the classical heat conduction equation can be expressed as the following in the Cartesian coordinate system:(1)ke∂2T∂x2+∂2T∂y2+∂2T∂z2+q+hT-Th+σεT4-Th4=ρ·c∂T∂t,where ke is the thermal conductivity of friction system, c is the specific heat capacity of friction system, q is the heat flux through the contact area, ρ is the density of friction system, h is the convective heat transfer coefficient, Th is the ambient temperature, σ is the radiation constant of a blackbody, and ε is the radiation rate of the actual object.To solve (1), the initial condition and boundary conditions are necessary. In this work, the initial condition is the original temperature of the pin-on-disc system at the beginning of the simulation, equal to 20°C. The boundary condition is the heat exchange condition between the outer surface of the pin-on-disc system and its surrounding environment. Generally, the boundary conditions can be classified into the following four kinds.The first boundary condition is the boundary temperature of objects, a known constant or function of position and time. It can be given as(2)TS=TSorTS=TSx,y,z,t,where S is the boundary of the pin-on-disc friction system.The second boundary condition refers to the heat flux,qw, at the boundary of the objects, which is a known constant or also a function of position and time. For pin-on-disc friction systems, it can be expressed as(3)-kT∂T∂n⃑S=qwor-kT∂T∂n⃑S=qwx,y,z,tqwx,y,z,t=η·μ·P·vx,y,z,t,where qw is the heat flux through the contact surface of the pin-on-disc system, a known constant; qw(x,y,z,t) is the expression of input heat flux, a function of position and time; η is the conversion efficiency, 0.85; μ is the friction coefficient of the system, 0.38; P is the normal pressure of the pin; v(x,y,z,t) is the relative linear velocity between disc and pin. Meanwhile, the lower surface of the disc can be regarded as being in the adiabatic state, whose boundary condition can be written as(4)-ke∂T∂z=0.The third boundary condition is the heat transfer coefficient of the medium in the surrounding environment. The most commonly used one is the mixed convection and radiation heat transfer boundary condition, which can be displayed as(5)-kT∂T∂n⃑S=hTS-Te+σεTS4-Te4,where σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant; ε is the radiation rate of the pin-on-disc system.The fourth boundary condition is the heat conduction between the disc and the pin and can be expressed as(6)-λn∂T∂nS=βTS-Te,where TS is the temperature of the disc or pin, Te is the temperature of the environment, and β is the heat transfer coefficient between the disc and the pin.For pin-on-disc friction system, the temperature distribution in the disc or the pin is very uneven during dry wear processes. As a result, a huge temperature gradient exists in the disc, which further induces high thermal stresses. Thus, the thermal strain is composed of two parts: one is caused by temperature variation, and the other is caused by stress.


## 3.2. Modelling and Setting

The contact surface between the pit textured disc and the pin was set as a friction pair, wherein the upper surface of the disc was the “target surface,” while the lower surface of the pin was the “contact surface” (see Figure3). During the simulation process, both faces were always kept in contact with each other under a vertical force of 70 N, equivalent to a pressure of approximately 0.98 MPa. As shown in Figure 3, to intuitively display the relative positions of the disc and pin, the disc was constricted in all DOFs based on the equivalent principle in the whole simulation. Conversely, an angular velocity of 25 rad/s (about 200 RPM) was applied to the pin, which could rotate anticlockwise or clockwise, respectively. In consideration of the performance of the computer used, the duration of the simulation was set to 0.5 s (100 substeps, i.e., 0.005 seconds per substep); thus it is only the heat conduction of the immediate friction interface that was considered during the simulation.The element type used in this work includes SOLID226, TARGE170, CONTA174, and MPC184. The number of elements is 40962. To easily understand and compare the obtained data, as shown in Figure3, two typical nodes, node 1 and node 2, were selected to demonstrate the thermal behavior of the pit textured surface in different rotation directions. Specifically, node 1 was on the upper surface of the disc, located at the middle of the initial contact face between the disc and the pin. Node 2 was also on the upper surface of the disc but rotated by 90 degrees anticlockwise.


## 3.3. Results and Discussion

### 3.3.1. Temperature Behavior of the Textured Surfaces

Figure4 shows the temperature contours of the pin-on-disc system for different rotation directions at the end of the simulation. As demonstrated in the figure, when the pin rotated anticlockwise, the heat affected region of the textured disc was larger than the affected area as the pin rotated in the contradirection. Furthermore, there was an evident uneven temperature phenomenon, which appeared on the pit textured surface that might be caused by the former mentioned “stick-slip friction,” whether the pin rotated in the clockwise or anticlockwise direction. This phenomenon could be called “temperature crawling” and was more obvious when the pin rotated clockwise.Figure 4
Temperature contours of pit textured surfaces after 0.5 s in different rotation directions.
(a)
Pin rotated anticlockwise
(b)
Pin rotated clockwiseFigure5 displays the temperature-time curves of node 1 and node 2 when the pin rotates in different directions. As shown in Figure 5(a), the temperature of node 1 gradually increased at the outset of the simulation, whether the pin rotated clockwise or anticlockwise. Both of the two curves were similar and had three obvious peaks at the 0.13 s, 0.25 s, and 0.38 s, respectively, corresponding to each moment where the pin passed over the node. Clearly, when the pin rotated anticlockwise, the average temperature of node 1 was lower than the temperature as the pin rotated in the clockwise direction, except for the first peak at 0.13 s. The temperatures of node 1 in the two rotation directions at 0.25 s were 20.4°C and 23.6°C, respectively, which equated to a temperature difference of 15.7%. The temperature difference of node 1 at 0.38 s was about 20.1%, the highest of the three peaks. For node 2, the two temperature-time curves, when the pin rotated clockwise and anticlockwise, also exhibited slow upward trends, with three peaks (see Figure 5(b)). It is evident that when the pin rotated in the anticlockwise direction, the average temperature of node 2 was also lower than the temperature when the pin rotated in the contradirection.Figure 5
Temperature-time curves of node 1 and node 2 in different rotation directions.
(a)
Node 1
(b)
Node 2By comparing Figures4 and 5, whether from the curves or contours, it is apparent that when the pin rotated anticlockwise, the pit textured surface exhibited slightly lower temperatures than when the pin rotated clockwise during the whole simulation, indicating a lower rate of temperature rise. Based on the relationship between temperature and friction and wear performance, under the same loading parameters and duration of simulation, the textured surface with the lower temperature rise would also be expected to show a lower friction coefficient and better wear resistance.


### 3.3.2. Thermal Stress Behavior of the Textured Surface

Figure6 displays thevon Mises stress contours of the pit textured surfaces in different rotation directions at the end of the simulation. As shown in the figure, for both rotation directions, the highvon Mises stress region was always located at the inner ring of the disc, because of the displacement constraint in all DOFs during the simulation, and extended towards the pit groups. Meanwhile, thevon Mises stress around the pits group was lower than the stresses in the smooth area without pits (see the enlarged view of Figure 7). The highestvon Mises stress region of the textured surface was the area that the pin had just passed over. By analyzing the simulation results, it is obvious that (1) the pit textured structure has an adjusting effect on the stress distribution of the whole disc and (2) the relative rotation direction between disc and pin can also alter the thermal stress behavior of the textured surface.Figure 6
Thevon Mises stress contours of pit textured surfaces in different rotation directions.
(a)
Pin rotated anticlockwise
(b)
Pin rotated clockwiseFigure 7
Enlarged contour of lowvon Mises stress region around the pit set.Figure8(a) shows thevon Mises stress-time curves of node 1 when the pin rotated in two different directions. Obviously, both of the curves fluctuated periodically, and thevon Mises stress decreased firstly and then increased, showing an upward trend on the whole. In general, when the pin rotated anticlockwise, the averagevon Mises stress of node 1 was smaller than the stress when the pin rotated in the contradirection. Figure 8(b) demonstrates thevon Mises stress-time curves of node 2 in different rotation directions. The two curves showed similar shapes, with the same downward trends and fixed time-lag. Evidently, when the pin rotated anticlockwise, thevon Mises stress variation of node 2 and its average value were all less than the stresses when the pin rotated clockwise.Figure 8
Thevon Mises stress-time curves of node 1 and node 2 in different rotation directions.
(a)
Node 1
(b)
Node 2By comparing temperature andvon Misesstress data in Figures 4–8, it is evident that the rotating direction of pin has an effect on the thermal behavior of pit textured surfaces. The temperature and stress of the contact surface can directly affect the friction properties of the textured surface, change the friction coefficient during friction process, and finally induce variations in tribological properties of the whole pin-on-disc system.


## 3.3.1. Temperature Behavior of the Textured Surfaces

Figure4 shows the temperature contours of the pin-on-disc system for different rotation directions at the end of the simulation. As demonstrated in the figure, when the pin rotated anticlockwise, the heat affected region of the textured disc was larger than the affected area as the pin rotated in the contradirection. Furthermore, there was an evident uneven temperature phenomenon, which appeared on the pit textured surface that might be caused by the former mentioned “stick-slip friction,” whether the pin rotated in the clockwise or anticlockwise direction. This phenomenon could be called “temperature crawling” and was more obvious when the pin rotated clockwise.Figure 4
Temperature contours of pit textured surfaces after 0.5 s in different rotation directions.
(a)
Pin rotated anticlockwise
(b)
Pin rotated clockwiseFigure5 displays the temperature-time curves of node 1 and node 2 when the pin rotates in different directions. As shown in Figure 5(a), the temperature of node 1 gradually increased at the outset of the simulation, whether the pin rotated clockwise or anticlockwise. Both of the two curves were similar and had three obvious peaks at the 0.13 s, 0.25 s, and 0.38 s, respectively, corresponding to each moment where the pin passed over the node. Clearly, when the pin rotated anticlockwise, the average temperature of node 1 was lower than the temperature as the pin rotated in the clockwise direction, except for the first peak at 0.13 s. The temperatures of node 1 in the two rotation directions at 0.25 s were 20.4°C and 23.6°C, respectively, which equated to a temperature difference of 15.7%. The temperature difference of node 1 at 0.38 s was about 20.1%, the highest of the three peaks. For node 2, the two temperature-time curves, when the pin rotated clockwise and anticlockwise, also exhibited slow upward trends, with three peaks (see Figure 5(b)). It is evident that when the pin rotated in the anticlockwise direction, the average temperature of node 2 was also lower than the temperature when the pin rotated in the contradirection.Figure 5
Temperature-time curves of node 1 and node 2 in different rotation directions.
(a)
Node 1
(b)
Node 2By comparing Figures4 and 5, whether from the curves or contours, it is apparent that when the pin rotated anticlockwise, the pit textured surface exhibited slightly lower temperatures than when the pin rotated clockwise during the whole simulation, indicating a lower rate of temperature rise. Based on the relationship between temperature and friction and wear performance, under the same loading parameters and duration of simulation, the textured surface with the lower temperature rise would also be expected to show a lower friction coefficient and better wear resistance.


## 3.3.2. Thermal Stress Behavior of the Textured Surface

Figure6 displays thevon Mises stress contours of the pit textured surfaces in different rotation directions at the end of the simulation. As shown in the figure, for both rotation directions, the highvon Mises stress region was always located at the inner ring of the disc, because of the displacement constraint in all DOFs during the simulation, and extended towards the pit groups. Meanwhile, thevon Mises stress around the pits group was lower than the stresses in the smooth area without pits (see the enlarged view of Figure 7). The highestvon Mises stress region of the textured surface was the area that the pin had just passed over. By analyzing the simulation results, it is obvious that (1) the pit textured structure has an adjusting effect on the stress distribution of the whole disc and (2) the relative rotation direction between disc and pin can also alter the thermal stress behavior of the textured surface.Figure 6
Thevon Mises stress contours of pit textured surfaces in different rotation directions.
(a)
Pin rotated anticlockwise
(b)
Pin rotated clockwiseFigure 7
Enlarged contour of lowvon Mises stress region around the pit set.Figure8(a) shows thevon Mises stress-time curves of node 1 when the pin rotated in two different directions. Obviously, both of the curves fluctuated periodically, and thevon Mises stress decreased firstly and then increased, showing an upward trend on the whole. In general, when the pin rotated anticlockwise, the averagevon Mises stress of node 1 was smaller than the stress when the pin rotated in the contradirection. Figure 8(b) demonstrates thevon Mises stress-time curves of node 2 in different rotation directions. The two curves showed similar shapes, with the same downward trends and fixed time-lag. Evidently, when the pin rotated anticlockwise, thevon Mises stress variation of node 2 and its average value were all less than the stresses when the pin rotated clockwise.Figure 8
Thevon Mises stress-time curves of node 1 and node 2 in different rotation directions.
(a)
Node 1
(b)
Node 2By comparing temperature andvon Misesstress data in Figures 4–8, it is evident that the rotating direction of pin has an effect on the thermal behavior of pit textured surfaces. The temperature and stress of the contact surface can directly affect the friction properties of the textured surface, change the friction coefficient during friction process, and finally induce variations in tribological properties of the whole pin-on-disc system.


## 4. Wear Test and Results

To verify the results of the simulations, a group of GCI samples were fabricated by a laser machining system (CL-FLS-30 W, Shenyang Qianshi Laser Co., Ltd.). The laser processing parameters are listed as follows: 1064 nm wavelength, laser power, 30 W, diameter of laser beam, 0.05 mm, and scanning speed, 5 mm/s. The friction and wear performances of prepared specimens were carried out on the tribology wear testing rig of MMU under dry sliding conditions. The parameters of the testing rig were as follows: normal load 70 N, equivalent to a pressure of approximately 0.98 MPa; room temperature, 20°C; rotation speed, 200 rpm, equivalent to a rotation speed of 22 rad·s−1. The duration of each test was set to 500 seconds. The counterface material was EN1A steel, with a hardness of approximately 800 HV. At the same time, in order to determine the influence of other disc materials on the antiwear performance, C30E steel (C 0.27~0.34, Mn 0.50~0.80, Ni ≤ 0.30, Si 0.17~0.37, P ≤ 0.035, S ≤ 0.035, Cr ≤ 0.25, and Cu ≤ 0.25, wt%) was also introduced as a comparative material for the same wear test. An analytical balance (Ohaus T2914) was used to measure the mass loss of the specimens, and the final mass loss was an average of three measurements. The worn surfaces were observed by stereo optical microscope (S1000 Industrial Stereo Microscope, Spectrographic Limited, with Vimage software of Suzhou Vezu Opto Technology, Co., Ltd.).Figure9 shows the friction coefficient curves of GCI and C30E steel samples in different rotation directions. Evidently, no matter whether the pin rotated in an anticlockwise or clockwise direction, the friction coefficient curves of the GCI samples were more stable and lower than the curves of the C30E steel samples. For both kinds of materials, the friction responses in different rotation directions were also different. When the pin rotated anticlockwise, the friction coefficient curves were more stable and the friction coefficient values were lower than those observed as the pin rotated in the contradirection.Figure 9
Friction coefficient curves of GCI and C30E steel specimens in different rotating directions.The worn surfaces of GCI and C30E steel samples as the pin rotated in different directions are shown in Figure10. The following was found: (1) Under the same friction testing condition, the worn surfaces of samples when the pin rotated in an anticlockwise or clockwise direction were quite different, regardless of the sample materials. (2) When the pin rotated anticlockwise, for the GCI samples, there were only a few visible wear tracks on the worn surface, and the tracks were independent and shallow (see Figure 10(a)). As the pin rotated in the opposite direction, the worn area of the pit textured specimen was much wider and deeper, and the wear tracks became contiguous (see Figure 10(b)). (3) For the C30E steel samples, there were serious viscous phenomena on the worn surfaces, whether the pin rotated anticlockwise (see Figure 10(c)) or clockwise (see Figure 10(d)). Meanwhile, a continuous sharp noise and juddering accompanied the whole testing process. (4) By comparing Figures 10(c) and 10(d), when the pin rotated clockwise, there were some pieces of debris on the edge of the worn surface after wear testing, and the surface morphology was uneven with many corrugations. This was reduced as the pin rotated in the anticlockwise direction.Figure 10
Worn surfaces of GCI and C30E steel samples after wear testing against EN1A counterfaces in different rotation directions.
(a)
GCI pin anticlockwise
(b)
GCI pin clockwise
(c)
C30E pin anticlockwise
(d)
C30E pin clockwiseTable2 displays the mass loss of the pit textured samples (GCI and C30E) after wear testing in different rotation directions. It is evident that (1) the mass losses of the C30E steel specimens were much greater than the losses of GCI samples, regardless of rotation direction, and (2) for both kinds of disc materials, when the pin rotated anticlockwise, the mass loss of the sample was much less than when the pin rotated clockwise. Therefore, the rotation direction of the pin is a significant factor for the wear resistance and tribological behavior of pit textured surfaces, which is also consistent with the former simulation results. Under the loading conditions of this work, with the curved design of the pit layout, the best results were observed when the pin rotated in an anticlockwise direction relative to the surface of the disc.Table 2
Wear loss of GCI and C30E steel samples in different rotation directions.
Sample name
Average mass before wear test (g)
Average mass after wear test (g)
Average mass loss (g)
GCI pin anticlockwise
80.71227
80.71190
0.00037
GCI pin clockwise
80.19157
80.18953
0.00203
C30E pin anticlockwise
88.96153
88.91047
0.05107
C30E pin clockwise
87.85777
87.70907
0.14870


## 5. Discussion

For the pin-on-disc friction system with curve distributed pit textured surfaces, there is an orientation effect, whether the rotation direction of the pin across the disc is anticlockwise or clockwise. As shown in Figure11(a), when the pin rotated anticlockwise, which is equivalent to the disc rotating clockwise (i.e., pin kept motionless), the following was shown clearly: (1) The innermost pit (or leading pit) would be the first one to be covered by the pin, followed in succession by the adjacent pits. This successive passage over the pits was found to be beneficial for the heat transfer process, including radiation and convection. As a result, the temperature of the pit textured surface was slightly lower, which was consistent with the slow variation speed of the former temperature behavior analysis. (2) The metal debris in front of the pin tended to be shifted from the inside to the outside of the disc (see the arrows in Figure 11(a)), under the push and squeeze of pin. At this point, the pits would act as a trap, to provide a sink for debris particles to sit in, and reduce the associated additional friction of debris in the contact zone. Under the combined effects of the movement of the pin and centrifugal force, the wear debris could be rapidly removed, which is significant for restricting the friction of the contact surface.Figure 11
Influence mechanism of rotation direction on the tribological behavior of pit textured surface.
(a)
Pin rotated anticlockwise
(b)
Pin rotated clockwiseConversely, as displayed in Figure11(b), when the pin rotated clockwise, equivalent to the disc rotating in an anticlockwise direction (pin kept motionless), the following results can be obtained: (1) All pits (whether leading pit or trailing pit) were almost passed over and covered by the pin simultaneously. It was disadvantageous for the heat transfer process and would cause a sudden rise in temperature, corresponding to the peaks observed in Figure 5. (2) The metal debris in front of the pin was prone to moving from the outside to the inside of the disc, under the action of the pin (see the arrows in Figure 11(b)). However, the centrifugal force would force wear debris to move along the radial or involute direction, depending on the rotating speed. Finally, the combined effects of the pin as well as centrifugal force would impede or slow the rapid removal of debris, causing a “second grinding” phenomenon on the contact surface, and worsen the tribological behavior of the pit textured surface.In the practical application of vehicle open brake systems with pits, there are two common installation methods for the brake discs, corresponding to the anticlockwise direction and clockwise direction studied in this work. If a disc was mounted as in Figure11(a), the wear resistance and durability of the brake disc would be enhanced by rapid removal of the brake debris and relatively lower surface temperatures during the braking process. However, if the brake disc was installed as shown in Figure 11(b), the brake system may provide a better braking performance, compared with the former installation method, but with high wear loss ratio and shorter service life. It is also consistent with the former results; that is, the anticlockwise rotation direction of the pin can provide better wear resistance than the clockwise rotation direction, under the conditions of this study. For the wet braking system, due to the microhydrodynamic lubrication effect of pits, the textured surface can offer the better tribological outcomes than its performance in dry wear conditions [25, 26].


## 6. Conclusions

Through theoretical analysis, numerical simulation, and experimental analysis, the influence of relative rotation direction between a textured disc and a pin on the tribological behavior of a pin-on-disc system with curve distributed pit textured surfaces was investigated. The influence mechanism was also proposed and discussed and the following conclusions could be drawn.(
1
) The relative rotation direction between the textured disc and the pin has a significant influence on the thermal behavior of pit textured surfaces, which can be proved, whether from the temperature curves/contours, or from thevon Mises stress curves/contours. When the pin rotated in an anticlockwise direction, the average temperature andvon Mises stress were both lower than those when the pin rotated clockwise.(
2
) Independent of rotation direction, there was an evident uneven temperature phenomenon on the texture surface, called “temperature crawling,” which might be induced by “stick-slip” behavior during friction.(
3
) When the pin rotated in an anticlockwise direction, the friction coefficient and wear loss were lower than those observed as the pin rotated in the contradirection. All the experimental results were in good agreement with the results of simulation, indicating that the anticlockwise rotation direction of the pin was a better choice under the conditions of this work.The influence of rotating speed on the tribological behavior of pit textured surfaces will be further researched in the future, for higher rotating speeds may reduce the temperature difference when the pin rotated anticlockwise or clockwise. The tribological behavior of other typical texture units, for example, “groove” and “grid,” as well as the prediction of friction and mass loss, will also be reported in the future, based on “element birth and death” technique and other FEA methods.



---

*Source: 8095916-2017-09-26.xml*