# Production of Lipid Microparticles Magnetically Active by a Supercritical Fluid-Based Process

Authors: Keti Vezzù; Chiara Campolmi; Alberto Bertucco
Journal: International Journal of Chemical Engineering
 (2009)

---

## Abstract

An original technique, based on supercriticalCO2 and on the particles from gas saturated solution (PGSS) micronization method, was developed to obtain magnetically active lipid microparticles. Magnetite nanoparticles (MNPs) were encapsulated into triestearin and phosphatidylcholine mixtures to increase their biocompatibility for future applications in the fields of biomedical diagnostics and therapeutic medications. The lipid particles produced were characterized to determine size and size distribution, and to confirm the encapsulation of MNP. The mean size was in the range of 200–800 nm. The possibility to drive these magnetically active particles by an external magnet was demonstrated in a simple apparatus simulating a vessel of the circulatory system. The results obtained indicate that the modified PGSS technique is suitable to produce lipid microparticles with magnetic activity for possible use in medical applications.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

For about forty years, nanoparticles with magnetic properties (MNPs) have received great interest in biomedical applications [1], as contrast agents in tomography imaging [2–4], drug delivery systems [5, 6], and especially in cancer treatment [7], thanks to the possibility to move them to the target site by an external magnetic field, and to accumulate in tissues and specific organs [8, 9] without disturbing the physiological activity. For instance, a drug can be carried to the target point, and here released either by the action of enzymes or by changes in physiological conditions such as pH, osmolality, and temperature. On the other hand, in cancer therapy, MNPs are used for their heating effect under the action of an alternate magnetic field of sufficient strength and frequency; the heat is transferred to the surrounding tissue and, if temperature is maintained above the therapeutic threshold of 42C° for at least 30 minutes, a significant result can be obtained [7].In addition, the magnetic response of these nanomaterials disappears after short time when the external field is removed thanks to their paramagnetic behavior, so possible secondary effects are greatly reduced.In order to inject MNPs into the human body, they must be coated with a suitably biocompatible material. So far, coated MNP systems have been prepared by using different polymers and lipids, such as polylactides, glycerides, fatty acids and pH-sensitive materials, and a number of techniques: high pressure homogenization, warm microemulsion dispersion, polymerization in an acidic medium, and nanoprecipitation [3, 5, 8, 10–13]. The coating of magnetite with polymers did not show acute nor subacute toxicity in animals [14]. However, the relatively high temperatures required for their preparation are a severe limit in the application of these techniques for the production of biologically active systems of thermolabile compounds, or when lower melting-point lipids are employed.In order to overcome this problem, we have developed a technique based on the particles from gas saturated solution process (PGSS) to encapsulate MNPs in lipid nano- and microparticles. PGSS [15] is a flexible solvent-free method operating under milder conditions in the presence of supercritical CO2. Our modified PGSS technique takes advantage of an inert gas suitably fed to the atomization system [16]. According to the process we are proposing, the MNP-containing lipid suspension is melted under CO2 pressure at moderate temperature, and then micronized through a nozzle using air/nitrogen as an atomization promoter, in order to obtain magnetically active lipid particles of size that can be adjusted by tuning the operative variables (pressure, temperatures, and inert gas to melt rate ratio).The MNP encapsulation was checked by electron microscopy. The size of the lipid particles and the encapsulation efficiency were determined by Light Scattering and Thermogravimetric Analysis techniques, respectively. The ability to move them by an external magnetic field was checked in a home-made apparatus, simulating a vessel of the circulatory system.


## 2. Materials and Experimental Set-Up

### 2.1. Materials

Nanoparticles of magnetite (Fe3O4), which is stable and displays low toxicity (LD50 in rats = 400 mg/kg) [14], were used in the experiments. Their size was between 10–30 nm.The lipids mixtures were based on triestearin, phosphatidylcholine, and oleic acid. Suitable amounts of ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH), dichloromethane (DCM), and Tween 20 (a surfactant) were added.All of the materials above were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Italy). Carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen, and air were supplied by Sapio (Monza, Italy) and helium by Air Liquid (Italy).Distilled and milliQ water was produced in our laboratory.


### 2.2. Conditioning of Magnetic Nanoparticles

The MNPs were wetted with oleic acid to increase their lipophilicity. Accordingly, 0.5 g of MNP were loaded in a glass vial, and 12.5 mL of deionized water and 0.024 mol ofNH4OH were added. Oxygen was removed with a helium flux, then the suspension was heated at 90C° for 30 minutes under stirring. After the addition of 0.038 mL of oleic acid, the mixture was kept at 90C° for 10 minutes, and then slowly cooled down. The MNPs  coated with oleic acid were dried under vacuum.


### 2.3. Preparation of Mixture Between Lipids and MNPs

The MNPs were dispersed in triestearin fine powder to obtain a mixture with desired and uniform composition. When phosphatidylcholine was used, it was dissolved in DCM. The triestearin-MNP mixture was added to this solution. The solvent was completely removed: by evaporation at room temperature overnight (8 hours) and under vacuum.


### 2.4. Apparatus and Procedure-PGSS

The apparatus to carry out our modified PGSS process is basically composed by a thermostated mixing chamber (MC), a piston pump (P2), an expansion section including the nozzle (CE), and a particle collection system. A schematic is shown in Figure1. Details are reported elsewhere [16].Figure 1
Schematic of  the apparatus to carry out our modified-PGSS technique: MO, electric motor; AM, stirrer; MC, mixing chamber; U, nozzle; CE, expansion chamber; F, filter; R1, R2, R3, and R4, electric resistances; SC, heater exchanger; P1, pump; P2, manual syringe pump; V1, V2, V3, V4, V5, and V6, on-off valves; PR, pressure reducer; C, air compressor; TIC, temperature indicator and controller.A suitable amount of the mixture to be processed is loaded in the mixing chamber, where it is contacted with supercriticalCO2 for the required time at selected temperature and pressure conditions. Then, it is pumped through the nozzle (U), where microparticles are produced. The micronization is promoted by two air/nitrogen auxiliary streams, one just before the nozzle (supplied by a cylinder at 200 bar), the other one in the collection chamber (supplied by a compressor at 10 bar). The particles are collected on a metallic filter (F) for further characterization.The temperatures of all the plant sections are carefully controlled to prevent undesired precipitation of solids. The temperature set-point values depend on the viscosity of mixtures used.In all the experiments completely dried particles were always collected from the filter.


### 2.5. Apparatus and Procedure—Simulated Circulatory Vessel

This equipment, sketched in Figure2, is made up of a glass tube with inner diameter of 3.5 mm (F), a peristaltic pump  (A), and a system for particles injection (B). The aqueous suspension flow rate (0–14 mm/s) can be controlled by varying the voltage (G) applied to the pump (A). Water is loaded in beaker C and the aqueous suspension is collected in beaker D.Figure 2
Schematic of the equipment simulating a circulatory vessel: A, peristaltic pump; B, injection system; C, D, beakers; E, permanent magnet; F, glass tube; G, tension regulator.A magnetic field of 900 Gauss (in the pipe center) is maintained by a permanent magnet, shaped as a ring, so that the field lines are parallel to the flow direction.About 6 mg of lipid particles containing MNPs were dispersed in 1.2 mL of milliQ water by ultrasounds (CP104, Vetrotecnica) for 20 minutes in an ice bath. About 1 mL of particle suspension was injected in the water flow by a precision syringe (B). After about 10 minutes, the pump was turned off. The amount of particles in suspension was determined by UV-vis measurement: the scattering peak is correlated to the concentration of particles in the suspension, according to a procedure developed elsewhere [17]. The mass of particles trapped by the magnetic field was obtained by the difference between the injected and collected amounts.


### 2.6. Particle Characterization

#### 2.6.1. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

DSC spectra were performed  using a Q10P/PDSC (TA Instruments) equipped with a pressure cell system that allows operating at high temperature (up to 80C°) and at different pressures (from 1 up to 60 bar). About 2 mg of substance, both unprocessed material and particles produced by the experiments, were analyzed at ambient pressure to study the effect of the micronization process. The unprocessed mixtures were also analyzed under CO2 pressure (from 1 to 60 bar) to study the plasticization effect.The heating and cooling rates were always 1C°/minute, a value found to be suitable to obtain accurate and reproducible results.


#### 2.6.2. Light Scattering (LS)

Particle size analysis was performed using a Nicomp 380/Dynamic Light Scattering, Submicron Particle Sizer (Particle Sizing Systems Santa Barbara-California). 1 mg of lipid-coated MNPs was suspended in 5 mL of deionized water (for triestearin-phosphatidylcholine particles), or in Tween 20 solution (for triestearin ones). The suspension was sonicated in an ice bath for 20 minutes before analysis.


#### 2.6.3. Transmission Microscopy (TEM) and electron diffraction

About 5–10 milligrams of particles were sonicated in isopropanol by a point sonicator (1 minute and 70 Watt at 20 kHz). Drops of this suspension were deposited on a cupper circular grid of 300 mesh, the solvent was evaporated for 12 hours at room temperature, then the samples were analyzed by a Jeol 3010 Microscope. With the same instrument also the diffraction measurements were performed.


#### 2.6.4. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

Few milligrams of particles were loaded in the aluminum pan of a thermogravimetric balance (TA Instruments). The sample was heated in air from room temperature to 900C°, with a rate of 500C°/ minute. The temperature was kept constant for 5 minutes to ensure complete lipid burning.


## 2.1. Materials

Nanoparticles of magnetite (Fe3O4), which is stable and displays low toxicity (LD50 in rats = 400 mg/kg) [14], were used in the experiments. Their size was between 10–30 nm.The lipids mixtures were based on triestearin, phosphatidylcholine, and oleic acid. Suitable amounts of ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH), dichloromethane (DCM), and Tween 20 (a surfactant) were added.All of the materials above were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Italy). Carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen, and air were supplied by Sapio (Monza, Italy) and helium by Air Liquid (Italy).Distilled and milliQ water was produced in our laboratory.


## 2.2. Conditioning of Magnetic Nanoparticles

The MNPs were wetted with oleic acid to increase their lipophilicity. Accordingly, 0.5 g of MNP were loaded in a glass vial, and 12.5 mL of deionized water and 0.024 mol ofNH4OH were added. Oxygen was removed with a helium flux, then the suspension was heated at 90C° for 30 minutes under stirring. After the addition of 0.038 mL of oleic acid, the mixture was kept at 90C° for 10 minutes, and then slowly cooled down. The MNPs  coated with oleic acid were dried under vacuum.


## 2.3. Preparation of Mixture Between Lipids and MNPs

The MNPs were dispersed in triestearin fine powder to obtain a mixture with desired and uniform composition. When phosphatidylcholine was used, it was dissolved in DCM. The triestearin-MNP mixture was added to this solution. The solvent was completely removed: by evaporation at room temperature overnight (8 hours) and under vacuum.


## 2.4. Apparatus and Procedure-PGSS

The apparatus to carry out our modified PGSS process is basically composed by a thermostated mixing chamber (MC), a piston pump (P2), an expansion section including the nozzle (CE), and a particle collection system. A schematic is shown in Figure1. Details are reported elsewhere [16].Figure 1
Schematic of  the apparatus to carry out our modified-PGSS technique: MO, electric motor; AM, stirrer; MC, mixing chamber; U, nozzle; CE, expansion chamber; F, filter; R1, R2, R3, and R4, electric resistances; SC, heater exchanger; P1, pump; P2, manual syringe pump; V1, V2, V3, V4, V5, and V6, on-off valves; PR, pressure reducer; C, air compressor; TIC, temperature indicator and controller.A suitable amount of the mixture to be processed is loaded in the mixing chamber, where it is contacted with supercriticalCO2 for the required time at selected temperature and pressure conditions. Then, it is pumped through the nozzle (U), where microparticles are produced. The micronization is promoted by two air/nitrogen auxiliary streams, one just before the nozzle (supplied by a cylinder at 200 bar), the other one in the collection chamber (supplied by a compressor at 10 bar). The particles are collected on a metallic filter (F) for further characterization.The temperatures of all the plant sections are carefully controlled to prevent undesired precipitation of solids. The temperature set-point values depend on the viscosity of mixtures used.In all the experiments completely dried particles were always collected from the filter.


## 2.5. Apparatus and Procedure—Simulated Circulatory Vessel

This equipment, sketched in Figure2, is made up of a glass tube with inner diameter of 3.5 mm (F), a peristaltic pump  (A), and a system for particles injection (B). The aqueous suspension flow rate (0–14 mm/s) can be controlled by varying the voltage (G) applied to the pump (A). Water is loaded in beaker C and the aqueous suspension is collected in beaker D.Figure 2
Schematic of the equipment simulating a circulatory vessel: A, peristaltic pump; B, injection system; C, D, beakers; E, permanent magnet; F, glass tube; G, tension regulator.A magnetic field of 900 Gauss (in the pipe center) is maintained by a permanent magnet, shaped as a ring, so that the field lines are parallel to the flow direction.About 6 mg of lipid particles containing MNPs were dispersed in 1.2 mL of milliQ water by ultrasounds (CP104, Vetrotecnica) for 20 minutes in an ice bath. About 1 mL of particle suspension was injected in the water flow by a precision syringe (B). After about 10 minutes, the pump was turned off. The amount of particles in suspension was determined by UV-vis measurement: the scattering peak is correlated to the concentration of particles in the suspension, according to a procedure developed elsewhere [17]. The mass of particles trapped by the magnetic field was obtained by the difference between the injected and collected amounts.


## 2.6. Particle Characterization

### 2.6.1. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

DSC spectra were performed  using a Q10P/PDSC (TA Instruments) equipped with a pressure cell system that allows operating at high temperature (up to 80C°) and at different pressures (from 1 up to 60 bar). About 2 mg of substance, both unprocessed material and particles produced by the experiments, were analyzed at ambient pressure to study the effect of the micronization process. The unprocessed mixtures were also analyzed under CO2 pressure (from 1 to 60 bar) to study the plasticization effect.The heating and cooling rates were always 1C°/minute, a value found to be suitable to obtain accurate and reproducible results.


### 2.6.2. Light Scattering (LS)

Particle size analysis was performed using a Nicomp 380/Dynamic Light Scattering, Submicron Particle Sizer (Particle Sizing Systems Santa Barbara-California). 1 mg of lipid-coated MNPs was suspended in 5 mL of deionized water (for triestearin-phosphatidylcholine particles), or in Tween 20 solution (for triestearin ones). The suspension was sonicated in an ice bath for 20 minutes before analysis.


### 2.6.3. Transmission Microscopy (TEM) and electron diffraction

About 5–10 milligrams of particles were sonicated in isopropanol by a point sonicator (1 minute and 70 Watt at 20 kHz). Drops of this suspension were deposited on a cupper circular grid of 300 mesh, the solvent was evaporated for 12 hours at room temperature, then the samples were analyzed by a Jeol 3010 Microscope. With the same instrument also the diffraction measurements were performed.


### 2.6.4. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

Few milligrams of particles were loaded in the aluminum pan of a thermogravimetric balance (TA Instruments). The sample was heated in air from room temperature to 900C°, with a rate of 500C°/ minute. The temperature was kept constant for 5 minutes to ensure complete lipid burning.


## 2.6.1. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

DSC spectra were performed  using a Q10P/PDSC (TA Instruments) equipped with a pressure cell system that allows operating at high temperature (up to 80C°) and at different pressures (from 1 up to 60 bar). About 2 mg of substance, both unprocessed material and particles produced by the experiments, were analyzed at ambient pressure to study the effect of the micronization process. The unprocessed mixtures were also analyzed under CO2 pressure (from 1 to 60 bar) to study the plasticization effect.The heating and cooling rates were always 1C°/minute, a value found to be suitable to obtain accurate and reproducible results.


## 2.6.2. Light Scattering (LS)

Particle size analysis was performed using a Nicomp 380/Dynamic Light Scattering, Submicron Particle Sizer (Particle Sizing Systems Santa Barbara-California). 1 mg of lipid-coated MNPs was suspended in 5 mL of deionized water (for triestearin-phosphatidylcholine particles), or in Tween 20 solution (for triestearin ones). The suspension was sonicated in an ice bath for 20 minutes before analysis.


## 2.6.3. Transmission Microscopy (TEM) and electron diffraction

About 5–10 milligrams of particles were sonicated in isopropanol by a point sonicator (1 minute and 70 Watt at 20 kHz). Drops of this suspension were deposited on a cupper circular grid of 300 mesh, the solvent was evaporated for 12 hours at room temperature, then the samples were analyzed by a Jeol 3010 Microscope. With the same instrument also the diffraction measurements were performed.


## 2.6.4. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

Few milligrams of particles were loaded in the aluminum pan of a thermogravimetric balance (TA Instruments). The sample was heated in air from room temperature to 900C°, with a rate of 500C°/ minute. The temperature was kept constant for 5 minutes to ensure complete lipid burning.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. DSC Measurements

Similar results were obtained from the DSC measurements on the starting mixtures and on the particles produced, with values of melting temperatures basically unaffected by the PGSS treatment and by the presence of MNPs (see Table1). However, the addition of phosphatidylcholine to triestearin significantly reduced the enthalpy of fusion.Table 1
DSC spectra measured at ambient pressure for triestearin-magnetite and triestearin-phosphatidylcholine-magnetite starting mixtures, and for particles produced by the modified-PGSS process.
CompositionMixturesParticles%TmeltΔHmeltTsolΔHsolTmeltΔHmeltmagnetite[C°][J/g][C°][J/g][C°][J/g]Triestearin-magnetite067.412648.610567.2144166.612349.011467.2144567.011748.811067.21381066.912248.910767.0125Triestearin-treated magnetite166.912748.911666.9110567.011848.810267.11401066.411048.89666.9155Triestearin-phosphatidylcholine-magnetite068.77351.04566.369168.86048.94066.978568.110049.36366.8691067.56249.34067.075Calorimetric measurements underCO2 pressure were carried out on triestearin-magnetite and triestearin-phosphatidylcholine-magnetite mixtures to study the effect of CO2 on the melting temperature. As shown in Figure 3, where the DSC spectra of triestearin-phosphatidylcholine with 10% (w/w) of MNP are reported as a function of CO2 pressure around the melting zone, by raising the pressure both the melting temperature and the enthalpy of fusion decreased. However, these changes were independent of the MNP concentration, similarly to the results obtained at ambient pressure.Figure 3
DSC spectra of triestearin-phosphatidylcholine-10% (w/w) magnetite mixture as a function of pressure.The reduction of melting temperature due toCO2 pressure is both a common feature and a requirement to perform successfully any PGSS-like process [18]. Our DSC measurements under CO2 pressure gave information to optimize the process experimental conditions, such as the temperature in the mixing chamber and that at the nozzle, in order to avoid undesired solidification. The operative conditions finally selected are summarized in Table 2.Table 2
Process operative conditions.
Composition% MNPP mixingT mixingT pumpT nozzle[bar][C°][C°][C°]Triestearin0, 1, 5, 10150–160605560Triestearin-Phosphatidylcholine0, 1, 5, 10150–160656065


### 3.2. LS Measurements

The lipid particles obtained were analyzed by LS to determine their average size and size distribution. Results are listed in Table3.Table 3
Light Scattering measurements on the lipid nano- and microparticles.
Composition% magnetite1°peak2° peak3°peakØ [nm]%Ø[nm]%Ø [nm]%Triestearin-magnetite0240 ± 10025876 ± 200751200 ± 8013400 ± 20014870 ± 200735245 ± 10014882 ± 2008610160 ± 508250 ± 905883 ± 20087Triestearin-magnetite treated with oleic acid1200 ± 8010887 ± 200905250 ± 8515887 ± 2008510160 ± 508254 ± 1105884 ± 20087Triestearin-phosphatidylcholine-magnetite0119 ± 5534500 ± 20066155 ± 2049200 ± 8015885 ± 20037580 ± 2540250 ± 8530885 ± 200301055 ± 2044200 ± 8015885 ± 20046The measurements showed bimodal and trimodal distributions, with one peak always at 890 nm, and the two others (if present) around 200 nm and around 400 nm. The larger peak is probably due to agglomerated particles not broken by sonication, as revealed by the residual error analysis (data not shown). By using a stronger sonicator, the residual error was slightly reduced, without affecting the average size values.The non-unimodal distribution could be partly due to the manual injection system of the MNP-lipid mixture in the nozzle. However, we recall that bimodal distributions are not unusual, as they were obtained also with other lipid mixtures [19], and they can be predicted by crystallization models taking into account agglomeration phenomena [19, 20].According to Table3, the average size values were not affected by the MNP concentration, and also the oleic acid pretreatment had negligible influence. It is also noteworthy that, when using a triestearin-phosphatidylcholine mixture (1:1 w/w), a higher fraction of particles with size lower than 500 nm was produced. This fact may be due to the surfactant effect of phosphatidylcholine, which reduces the average drop size out of the nozzle.It can be concluded that the size of the particles produced by the modified-PGSS technique presently developed is compatible to their possible application as carriers for biomedical diagnostics and therapeutic medications.


### 3.3. TEM Analysis

As shown in Figure4 lipid particles of different color were obtained depending on the amount of magnetite used in the preparation of the initial mixture: they get darker and darker when increasing this amount, thus suggesting the encapsulation of more magnetite [21].Pictures of particles produced by the modified-PGSS process starting from: (a) triestearin, (b) triestearin + 1% magnetite, (c) triestearin + 5% magnetite, (d) triestearin + 10% magnetite, and (e) magnetite powder.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)The encapsulation was confirmed by TEM analysis. Examples of TEM micrographs are reported in Figures5(a), 5(b), and 5(c). Here, it is possible to distinguish magnetite (darker spheres) from lipids, which look gray. In particular, the arrows in Figure 5(c) indicate two nanospheres of magnetite inside a single lipid nanoparticle.Micrographs of triestearin-5% magnetite produced by the modified-PGSS technique: (a), (b), (c) TEM images. Two MNPs enclosed in a lipid particle are evidenced by the yellow arrows; (d) spot of diffraction of electron beam on magnetite nanoparticles.
(a)(b)(c)(d)The size of the particles in Figure5 is of about 20–50 nm; in fact, it was decided to perform the TEM analysis on the fraction of smaller particles only, to avoid side effects due to the strength of the magnetic field of the instrument.To confirm that the dark spots are magnetite nanoparticles, the same samples were analyzed by electronic diffraction. A result is displayed in Figure5(d), where the circular alignment of white spots can be observed, corresponding to the diffraction due to crystalline material. Such a crystallinity must be ascribed to the magnetite and not to the lipids, because in the modified-PGSS, process the cooling step is so rapid not to permit any crystallization of the lipidic fraction.


### 3.4. TGA Measurements

By TGA analysis, the amount of MNPs encapsulated in the lipid particles was evaluated. During the TGA heating process, at 200–300C° the iron contained in magnetite (Fe3O4) is oxidized to Fe2O3, so the percent of magnetite encapsulated can be evaluated by:(1)%encapsulation=mFe3O4mFe3O4,theoretical·100with:mFe2O3=NPLMres-SLNresmFe3O4=mFe2O3PMFe2O3·23·PMFe3O4,
where mFe2O3, mFe3O4 are the mass of ferric oxide and magnetite analyzed, NPLMres and SLNres are the mass of lipid particles with and without magnetite remaining after the combustion process, PMFe2O3 and PMFe3O4 are the molecular weights, and mFe3O4,theoreticalis the amount of magnetite used in the initial mixture.The TGA results, summarized in Table4, show that the amount of magnetite encapsulated was less than that loaded in the mixing chamber. The encapsulation efficiency is independent of the kind of lipid, and increases with the concentration of magnetite in the initial mixture. This last fact suggests that efficiency is probably due to wall deposition of MNP, and that it can be increased by using and apparatus with lower surface-to-volume ratio (i.e., by scaling up the process). Anyway, our values are lower than those given by Okassa et al. [22], who employed the double emulsion method and the emulsion evaporation process.Table 4
Efficiency of magnetite nanoparticles encapsulation in the lipid particles and their saturation magnetization.
Composition%Fe3O4%Fe3O4%MS(NPLM)theoreticalencapsulatedencapsulation[emu/g]Triestearin51.736%1.02Triestearin-phosphatidylcholine10.2222%0.13Triestearin-phosphatidylcholine51.940%1.14From the TGA results, the magnetic saturation (MS(NPLM)) can be calculated as [23]:(2)MS(NPLM)=%encapsulation·MS(magnetite)100
where MS(magnetite) is the saturation magnetization of MNP. It is possible to assume that MS of 10–30 nm magnetite nanospheres is about 60 emu/g, a value in between those given by literature [23, 24]. Also the saturation magnetization of the lipid particles is reported in Table 4.According to the saturation magnetization, it is possible to calculate the force applied to a coated magnetite particle in a fixed magnetic gradient field.


### 3.5. Capture of Particles by an External Magnetic Field

The possibility to trap the microparticles produced by the modified-PGSS technique was studied by the apparatus in Figure2 according to the procedure outlined earlier.The results obtained are displayed in Figure6. In particular we note that the entrapment depends on the amount of magnetite encapsulated (Figure 6(a)) and on the fluid velocity (Figure 6(b)). Solid lipid (pure triestearin) particles yield negligible capture values, within the experimental error (± 2%), thus excluding any affinity between the tube wall and the lipid particles, and confirming that entrapment was due to the effect of the external magnet field only.Entrapment of triestearin-magnetite particles as a function of: (a) percentage of magnetite in the starting lipid mixture and (b) fluid velocity.
(a)(b)The encapsulation efficiency is positively affected by the magnetite concentration in the initial mixture (Figure6(a)), as already seen from TGA measurements (Table 4), whereas the fluid velocity has a negative effect.Finally, from Figure7 it can be clearly seen that the entrapment is independent of the lipid matrix of the nano- and microparticles.Figure 7
Entrapment of triestearin-magnetite (void symbols) and triestearin-phosphatidylcholine-magnetite (full symbol) particles as a  function of fluid velocity and concentration of magnetite in the initial mixture.As shown in the Appendix, the particles are trapped not as single particles but as aggregates (ferrofluids, [23]), which are formed by the magnetization of MNP due to the magnetic field applied.In our case, the treatment of magnetite with oleic acid did not increase the entrapment efficiency, as suggested by Okassa et al. [22]. These results could be explained by the lower oleic acid amount we have used, with respect to other authors: for instance, Farridi-Majidi et al. [25], who used more oleic acid per unit MNP, found an increased encapsulation efficiency and also a larger particle size, an effect we tried to avoid.We point out that the magnetic field applied (900 G) was lower than the maximum value applicable to the human body (8000 G, [24]). Therefore, the lipid magnetic particles produced by our modified-PGSS process have properties which are suitable for future use in biomedical application.


## 3.1. DSC Measurements

Similar results were obtained from the DSC measurements on the starting mixtures and on the particles produced, with values of melting temperatures basically unaffected by the PGSS treatment and by the presence of MNPs (see Table1). However, the addition of phosphatidylcholine to triestearin significantly reduced the enthalpy of fusion.Table 1
DSC spectra measured at ambient pressure for triestearin-magnetite and triestearin-phosphatidylcholine-magnetite starting mixtures, and for particles produced by the modified-PGSS process.
CompositionMixturesParticles%TmeltΔHmeltTsolΔHsolTmeltΔHmeltmagnetite[C°][J/g][C°][J/g][C°][J/g]Triestearin-magnetite067.412648.610567.2144166.612349.011467.2144567.011748.811067.21381066.912248.910767.0125Triestearin-treated magnetite166.912748.911666.9110567.011848.810267.11401066.411048.89666.9155Triestearin-phosphatidylcholine-magnetite068.77351.04566.369168.86048.94066.978568.110049.36366.8691067.56249.34067.075Calorimetric measurements underCO2 pressure were carried out on triestearin-magnetite and triestearin-phosphatidylcholine-magnetite mixtures to study the effect of CO2 on the melting temperature. As shown in Figure 3, where the DSC spectra of triestearin-phosphatidylcholine with 10% (w/w) of MNP are reported as a function of CO2 pressure around the melting zone, by raising the pressure both the melting temperature and the enthalpy of fusion decreased. However, these changes were independent of the MNP concentration, similarly to the results obtained at ambient pressure.Figure 3
DSC spectra of triestearin-phosphatidylcholine-10% (w/w) magnetite mixture as a function of pressure.The reduction of melting temperature due toCO2 pressure is both a common feature and a requirement to perform successfully any PGSS-like process [18]. Our DSC measurements under CO2 pressure gave information to optimize the process experimental conditions, such as the temperature in the mixing chamber and that at the nozzle, in order to avoid undesired solidification. The operative conditions finally selected are summarized in Table 2.Table 2
Process operative conditions.
Composition% MNPP mixingT mixingT pumpT nozzle[bar][C°][C°][C°]Triestearin0, 1, 5, 10150–160605560Triestearin-Phosphatidylcholine0, 1, 5, 10150–160656065


## 3.2. LS Measurements

The lipid particles obtained were analyzed by LS to determine their average size and size distribution. Results are listed in Table3.Table 3
Light Scattering measurements on the lipid nano- and microparticles.
Composition% magnetite1°peak2° peak3°peakØ [nm]%Ø[nm]%Ø [nm]%Triestearin-magnetite0240 ± 10025876 ± 200751200 ± 8013400 ± 20014870 ± 200735245 ± 10014882 ± 2008610160 ± 508250 ± 905883 ± 20087Triestearin-magnetite treated with oleic acid1200 ± 8010887 ± 200905250 ± 8515887 ± 2008510160 ± 508254 ± 1105884 ± 20087Triestearin-phosphatidylcholine-magnetite0119 ± 5534500 ± 20066155 ± 2049200 ± 8015885 ± 20037580 ± 2540250 ± 8530885 ± 200301055 ± 2044200 ± 8015885 ± 20046The measurements showed bimodal and trimodal distributions, with one peak always at 890 nm, and the two others (if present) around 200 nm and around 400 nm. The larger peak is probably due to agglomerated particles not broken by sonication, as revealed by the residual error analysis (data not shown). By using a stronger sonicator, the residual error was slightly reduced, without affecting the average size values.The non-unimodal distribution could be partly due to the manual injection system of the MNP-lipid mixture in the nozzle. However, we recall that bimodal distributions are not unusual, as they were obtained also with other lipid mixtures [19], and they can be predicted by crystallization models taking into account agglomeration phenomena [19, 20].According to Table3, the average size values were not affected by the MNP concentration, and also the oleic acid pretreatment had negligible influence. It is also noteworthy that, when using a triestearin-phosphatidylcholine mixture (1:1 w/w), a higher fraction of particles with size lower than 500 nm was produced. This fact may be due to the surfactant effect of phosphatidylcholine, which reduces the average drop size out of the nozzle.It can be concluded that the size of the particles produced by the modified-PGSS technique presently developed is compatible to their possible application as carriers for biomedical diagnostics and therapeutic medications.


## 3.3. TEM Analysis

As shown in Figure4 lipid particles of different color were obtained depending on the amount of magnetite used in the preparation of the initial mixture: they get darker and darker when increasing this amount, thus suggesting the encapsulation of more magnetite [21].Pictures of particles produced by the modified-PGSS process starting from: (a) triestearin, (b) triestearin + 1% magnetite, (c) triestearin + 5% magnetite, (d) triestearin + 10% magnetite, and (e) magnetite powder.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)The encapsulation was confirmed by TEM analysis. Examples of TEM micrographs are reported in Figures5(a), 5(b), and 5(c). Here, it is possible to distinguish magnetite (darker spheres) from lipids, which look gray. In particular, the arrows in Figure 5(c) indicate two nanospheres of magnetite inside a single lipid nanoparticle.Micrographs of triestearin-5% magnetite produced by the modified-PGSS technique: (a), (b), (c) TEM images. Two MNPs enclosed in a lipid particle are evidenced by the yellow arrows; (d) spot of diffraction of electron beam on magnetite nanoparticles.
(a)(b)(c)(d)The size of the particles in Figure5 is of about 20–50 nm; in fact, it was decided to perform the TEM analysis on the fraction of smaller particles only, to avoid side effects due to the strength of the magnetic field of the instrument.To confirm that the dark spots are magnetite nanoparticles, the same samples were analyzed by electronic diffraction. A result is displayed in Figure5(d), where the circular alignment of white spots can be observed, corresponding to the diffraction due to crystalline material. Such a crystallinity must be ascribed to the magnetite and not to the lipids, because in the modified-PGSS, process the cooling step is so rapid not to permit any crystallization of the lipidic fraction.


## 3.4. TGA Measurements

By TGA analysis, the amount of MNPs encapsulated in the lipid particles was evaluated. During the TGA heating process, at 200–300C° the iron contained in magnetite (Fe3O4) is oxidized to Fe2O3, so the percent of magnetite encapsulated can be evaluated by:(1)%encapsulation=mFe3O4mFe3O4,theoretical·100with:mFe2O3=NPLMres-SLNresmFe3O4=mFe2O3PMFe2O3·23·PMFe3O4,
where mFe2O3, mFe3O4 are the mass of ferric oxide and magnetite analyzed, NPLMres and SLNres are the mass of lipid particles with and without magnetite remaining after the combustion process, PMFe2O3 and PMFe3O4 are the molecular weights, and mFe3O4,theoreticalis the amount of magnetite used in the initial mixture.The TGA results, summarized in Table4, show that the amount of magnetite encapsulated was less than that loaded in the mixing chamber. The encapsulation efficiency is independent of the kind of lipid, and increases with the concentration of magnetite in the initial mixture. This last fact suggests that efficiency is probably due to wall deposition of MNP, and that it can be increased by using and apparatus with lower surface-to-volume ratio (i.e., by scaling up the process). Anyway, our values are lower than those given by Okassa et al. [22], who employed the double emulsion method and the emulsion evaporation process.Table 4
Efficiency of magnetite nanoparticles encapsulation in the lipid particles and their saturation magnetization.
Composition%Fe3O4%Fe3O4%MS(NPLM)theoreticalencapsulatedencapsulation[emu/g]Triestearin51.736%1.02Triestearin-phosphatidylcholine10.2222%0.13Triestearin-phosphatidylcholine51.940%1.14From the TGA results, the magnetic saturation (MS(NPLM)) can be calculated as [23]:(2)MS(NPLM)=%encapsulation·MS(magnetite)100
where MS(magnetite) is the saturation magnetization of MNP. It is possible to assume that MS of 10–30 nm magnetite nanospheres is about 60 emu/g, a value in between those given by literature [23, 24]. Also the saturation magnetization of the lipid particles is reported in Table 4.According to the saturation magnetization, it is possible to calculate the force applied to a coated magnetite particle in a fixed magnetic gradient field.


## 3.5. Capture of Particles by an External Magnetic Field

The possibility to trap the microparticles produced by the modified-PGSS technique was studied by the apparatus in Figure2 according to the procedure outlined earlier.The results obtained are displayed in Figure6. In particular we note that the entrapment depends on the amount of magnetite encapsulated (Figure 6(a)) and on the fluid velocity (Figure 6(b)). Solid lipid (pure triestearin) particles yield negligible capture values, within the experimental error (± 2%), thus excluding any affinity between the tube wall and the lipid particles, and confirming that entrapment was due to the effect of the external magnet field only.Entrapment of triestearin-magnetite particles as a function of: (a) percentage of magnetite in the starting lipid mixture and (b) fluid velocity.
(a)(b)The encapsulation efficiency is positively affected by the magnetite concentration in the initial mixture (Figure6(a)), as already seen from TGA measurements (Table 4), whereas the fluid velocity has a negative effect.Finally, from Figure7 it can be clearly seen that the entrapment is independent of the lipid matrix of the nano- and microparticles.Figure 7
Entrapment of triestearin-magnetite (void symbols) and triestearin-phosphatidylcholine-magnetite (full symbol) particles as a  function of fluid velocity and concentration of magnetite in the initial mixture.As shown in the Appendix, the particles are trapped not as single particles but as aggregates (ferrofluids, [23]), which are formed by the magnetization of MNP due to the magnetic field applied.In our case, the treatment of magnetite with oleic acid did not increase the entrapment efficiency, as suggested by Okassa et al. [22]. These results could be explained by the lower oleic acid amount we have used, with respect to other authors: for instance, Farridi-Majidi et al. [25], who used more oleic acid per unit MNP, found an increased encapsulation efficiency and also a larger particle size, an effect we tried to avoid.We point out that the magnetic field applied (900 G) was lower than the maximum value applicable to the human body (8000 G, [24]). Therefore, the lipid magnetic particles produced by our modified-PGSS process have properties which are suitable for future use in biomedical application.


## 4. Conclusions

Nanoparticles of magnetite were coated with lipids to form lipid nano- and microparticles by a modified-PGSS technique carried out at moderate temperature.Small size lipid particles with magnetic activity were produced: more than 50% of them had diameter less than 500 nm. The encapsulation efficiency of magnetite nanoparticles was about 30% and increased with the concentration of magnetite in the initial mixture.The possibility to trap the lipid-coated magnetite nanoparticles by an external magnet was demonstrated in a simple apparatus, with results comparable to those found in literature for polymeric coatings: about 30% of the particles trapped, when using a magnetic field value compatible with applications to the human body.The coating of magnetite nanoparticles with lipids by the modified-PGSS process presently developed provide materials which may be interesting for diagnostic and therapeutic applications.



---

*Source: 781247-2009-08-26.xml*