# Seasonal Fluctuation of the Population and Characterization ofBacillus spp. Isolated from the Coastal Soils of Digha, West Bengal, India

Authors: Syed Afrin Azmi; Soumendranath Chatterjee
Journal: International Journal of Ecology
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

Seasonal fluctuation of the population ofBacillus spp. in the coastal soils of Digha, West Bengal, India, was determined and it has been found that, during summer, monsoon, and winter season, theBacillus population density varied in the range of 0.01–0.236 × 106, 0.11–0.202 × 106, and 0.098–0.155 × 106, respectively. Two-way ANOVA, agglomerative hierarchial cluster (AHC) analysis, and principal component analysis (PCA) were performed to determine the diversity ofBacillus spp. in both spatial and temporal aspects. During summer season, the population ofBacillus spp. reached a comparatively higher density than monsoon or winter. Spatial variation was also exhibited among theBacillus spp. in different coastal villages. A total of 25 strains ofBacillus spp. (DSB1–DSB25) were isolated from the coastal soils of different village areas of Digha, during the study period. The isolates were characterized morphologically, physiologically, and biochemically. Colony morphology of each of the isolates was thoroughly studied. Biochemical tests along with fermentation tests, NaCl, pH, and temperature tolerance tests were done. The antibiotic sensitivity of the isolatedBacillus spp. against different standard antibiotics was also assessed. The study revealed that the coastal soils of Digha area were rich in different strains ofBacillus spp. showing significant differences in the morphophysiological and biochemical properties.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Diversity is composed of richness and evenness and it occurs in nature across all forms of life at global, regional, and local scale. Microorganisms represent the richest repertoire of molecular and chemical diversity in nature, as they comprise the most diverse form of life and also they are extraordinary reservoir of life in the biosphere that we have to explore and understand [1]. Among the extremophilic microorganisms, bacteria are the most dominant group involved in the biogeochemical cycling mainly mediated by their enzymatic reactions. Nowadays, for sustaining a relatively pollution-free environment, a significant proportion of the bacterial flora which is not harmful to human being is exploited worldwide as biocontrol agents against different hazardous pests and vectors that were previously controlled by chemical pesticides [2]. Among the bacterial groups,Bacillus spp. are commercially formulated for biological control of plant pathogens as well as of vectors of several pathogenic agents of deadly diseases [3].The bacteria of the genusBacillus are generally defined as Gram-positive, aerobic or facultative anaerobic, motile, endospore-forming rod shaped microorganisms [4]. They are found in diverse environments such as soil and clays, rocks, dust, aquatic environments, vegetation, food, and the gastrointestinal tracts of various insects and animals [5]. The genusBacillus is phenotypically and genotypically heterogeneous with its members exhibiting an extremely wide range of nutritional requirements, growth conditions, metabolic diversity, and DNA base composition [6]. Diversity of different strains ofBacillus is also exhibited in biochemical properties such as the ability to degrade many different substrates including cellulose, starch, proteins, agar, hydrocarbons, and also biofuels that are derived from plant and animal sources [7]. Furthermore, someBacillus species are heterotrophic nitrifiers, denitrifiers, nitrogen fixers, iron precipitators, selenium oxidizers, oxidizers and reducers of manganese, facultative chemolithotrophs, acidophiles, alkaliphiles, psychrophiles, thermophiles, and halophiles [6, 8]. This diversity in biophysiological characteristics thus allowed theBacillus species to occupy and colonize a wide variety of ecological niches. This ability of wide ecological diversification ofBacillus strains is potentiated by the production of spores, which are characterized by their magnificent ability of resistance against environmental stresses and dormancy. Several studies have been done on theBacillus diversity all over the world, but in this context the coastal soils of Digha area remained unexplored till date. The coastal areas of Digha having special environmental condition, such as high humidity, high salinity, and low nutrient availability in soil, may contain bioresource microbes with special adaptable characteristics that would help them to be sustained in adverse environmental condition for a long time. The present piece of work was aimed at studying the seasonal population diversity ofBacillus spp. along with their characterization on morphological, biochemical, and physiological aspects in the coastal areas of Digha, West Bengal, India.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Soil Collection

The soil samples were collected from nine village areas of Midnapore coastal belt, West Bengal, India (Padima (21°37′39′′N, 87°29′28′′E), Jatimati (21°37′40′′N, 87°29′46′′E), Chanpabani (21°37′39′′N, 87°30′22′′E), Palsandapur (21°37′30′′N, 87°30′04′′E), Bhagibaharampur (21°37′36′′N, 87°30′44′′E), Duttapur (21°36′57′′N, 87°29′29′′E), Gadadharpur (21°37′05′′N, 87°30′04′′E), Gobindabasan (21°37′36′′N, 87°31′18′′E), and Somaibasan (21°37′50′′N, 87°32′11′′E)) during the time period from March 2014 to February 2015 (Figure1). The topmost soil (1 cm) was scrapped off and then about 100 g of soil from each area (9 samples/area) was collected in sterile polythene bags sealed with rubber bands and taken to the Parasitology and Microbiology Research Laboratory, The University of Burdwan.Figure 1
GIS image of the study site showing seasonal diversity ofBacillus spp. in bar diagrams.


### 2.2. Culture and Enumeration of theBacillus Colonies from Soil

To study the seasonal diversity ofBacillus spp. in coastal areas of Digha, the soil suspensions were made (up to 10−5 dilution) and were pasteurized at 60°C for 30 minutes. A 100 μL portion of the pasteurized soil suspensions was mixed with 100 mL of Nutrient Agar (peptone 5 g/L, beef extract 3 g/L, NaCl 5 g/L, and agar 15 g/L, pH 7.4 ± 0.2), KG agar (peptic digest of animal tissue 1 g/L, yeast extract 0.5 g/L, phenol red 0.025 g/L, and agar 18 g/L, final pH 6.8 ± 0.2, after autoclaving, sterile egg yolk emulsion 100 mL/L and polymyxin B), and Hicrome Bacillus agar (peptic digest of animal tissue 10 g/L, meat extract 1 g/L, d-mannitol 10 g/L, sodium chloride 10 g/L, chromogenic mixture 3.2 g/L, phenol red 0.025 g/L, and agar 15 g/L, final pH 7.1 ± 0.2) media separately and plated on Petri dishes and then incubated in a Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) incubator at 30 ± 0.1°C for 48 hours. After incubation, the colonies grown in those media were observed thoroughly for screening of theBacillus colonies and a portion of each colony was observed under microscope to observe the rod shaped vegetative cells. TheBacillus colonies were then enumerated and total colony forming unit (cfu)/g of dry soil was calculated [9, 10].


### 2.3. Isolation and Characterization of theBacillus spp.

The isolatedBacillus colonies were streaked on Nutrient Agar slants and stored at 4°C for further characterization. Morphological characters of the colonies and physiological and biochemical characters of the bacterial isolates were studied following the standard microbiological methods [11–13]. To study the biochemical properties, catalase, citrate utilization, nitrate reduction, indole production, methyl-red, Voges-Proskauer, urease, oxidase, temperature tolerance, pH tolerance, NaCl tolerance, and carbohydrate metabolism (acid gas production) tests were done. Total carbohydrate, protein, and DNA content of the bacterial isolates were estimated to assess the cellular constituents of the isolates [14–16]. For qualitative characterization of enzymes produced, starch hydrolysis, lipase, protein hydrolysis, gelatin hydrolysis, and casein hydrolysis tests were done.


### 2.4. Antibiotic Sensitivity Test

Antibiotic sensitivity tests of the bacterial isolates against different standard antibiotic discs (Amoxicillin (10μg), Chloramphenicol (30 μg), Ciprofloxacin (30 μg), Kanamycin (30 μg), Streptomycin (10 μg), Tetracycline (30 μg), Vancomycin (30 μg), polymyxin B (300 units), Bacitracin (10 units), Ampicillin (10 μg), Nystatin (100 U), Erythromycin (15 μg), Penicillin G (10 units), and Rifampicin (5 μg)) were performed following Brown [17].


### 2.5. Statistical Analysis

Two-way ANOVA, agglomerative hierarchial cluster analysis, principal component analysis, and other statistical analyses of the observed experimental data were performed using Microsoft Excel 2007 and SPSS statistical 17.0 software [18].


## 2.1. Soil Collection

The soil samples were collected from nine village areas of Midnapore coastal belt, West Bengal, India (Padima (21°37′39′′N, 87°29′28′′E), Jatimati (21°37′40′′N, 87°29′46′′E), Chanpabani (21°37′39′′N, 87°30′22′′E), Palsandapur (21°37′30′′N, 87°30′04′′E), Bhagibaharampur (21°37′36′′N, 87°30′44′′E), Duttapur (21°36′57′′N, 87°29′29′′E), Gadadharpur (21°37′05′′N, 87°30′04′′E), Gobindabasan (21°37′36′′N, 87°31′18′′E), and Somaibasan (21°37′50′′N, 87°32′11′′E)) during the time period from March 2014 to February 2015 (Figure1). The topmost soil (1 cm) was scrapped off and then about 100 g of soil from each area (9 samples/area) was collected in sterile polythene bags sealed with rubber bands and taken to the Parasitology and Microbiology Research Laboratory, The University of Burdwan.Figure 1
GIS image of the study site showing seasonal diversity ofBacillus spp. in bar diagrams.


## 2.2. Culture and Enumeration of theBacillus Colonies from Soil

To study the seasonal diversity ofBacillus spp. in coastal areas of Digha, the soil suspensions were made (up to 10−5 dilution) and were pasteurized at 60°C for 30 minutes. A 100 μL portion of the pasteurized soil suspensions was mixed with 100 mL of Nutrient Agar (peptone 5 g/L, beef extract 3 g/L, NaCl 5 g/L, and agar 15 g/L, pH 7.4 ± 0.2), KG agar (peptic digest of animal tissue 1 g/L, yeast extract 0.5 g/L, phenol red 0.025 g/L, and agar 18 g/L, final pH 6.8 ± 0.2, after autoclaving, sterile egg yolk emulsion 100 mL/L and polymyxin B), and Hicrome Bacillus agar (peptic digest of animal tissue 10 g/L, meat extract 1 g/L, d-mannitol 10 g/L, sodium chloride 10 g/L, chromogenic mixture 3.2 g/L, phenol red 0.025 g/L, and agar 15 g/L, final pH 7.1 ± 0.2) media separately and plated on Petri dishes and then incubated in a Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) incubator at 30 ± 0.1°C for 48 hours. After incubation, the colonies grown in those media were observed thoroughly for screening of theBacillus colonies and a portion of each colony was observed under microscope to observe the rod shaped vegetative cells. TheBacillus colonies were then enumerated and total colony forming unit (cfu)/g of dry soil was calculated [9, 10].


## 2.3. Isolation and Characterization of theBacillus spp.

The isolatedBacillus colonies were streaked on Nutrient Agar slants and stored at 4°C for further characterization. Morphological characters of the colonies and physiological and biochemical characters of the bacterial isolates were studied following the standard microbiological methods [11–13]. To study the biochemical properties, catalase, citrate utilization, nitrate reduction, indole production, methyl-red, Voges-Proskauer, urease, oxidase, temperature tolerance, pH tolerance, NaCl tolerance, and carbohydrate metabolism (acid gas production) tests were done. Total carbohydrate, protein, and DNA content of the bacterial isolates were estimated to assess the cellular constituents of the isolates [14–16]. For qualitative characterization of enzymes produced, starch hydrolysis, lipase, protein hydrolysis, gelatin hydrolysis, and casein hydrolysis tests were done.


## 2.4. Antibiotic Sensitivity Test

Antibiotic sensitivity tests of the bacterial isolates against different standard antibiotic discs (Amoxicillin (10μg), Chloramphenicol (30 μg), Ciprofloxacin (30 μg), Kanamycin (30 μg), Streptomycin (10 μg), Tetracycline (30 μg), Vancomycin (30 μg), polymyxin B (300 units), Bacitracin (10 units), Ampicillin (10 μg), Nystatin (100 U), Erythromycin (15 μg), Penicillin G (10 units), and Rifampicin (5 μg)) were performed following Brown [17].


## 2.5. Statistical Analysis

Two-way ANOVA, agglomerative hierarchial cluster analysis, principal component analysis, and other statistical analyses of the observed experimental data were performed using Microsoft Excel 2007 and SPSS statistical 17.0 software [18].


## 3. Result

In the coastal areas of Digha, during summer, monsoon, and winter season, theBacillus population density varied in the ranges of 0.01–0.236 × 106, 0.11–0.202 × 106, and 0.098–0.155 × 106, respectively (Table 1). In soil samples of Padima, Jatimati, Palsandapur, Bhagibaharampur, Gadadharpur, Gobindabasan, and Somaibasan village areas, theBacillus population showed higher density in summer season whereas, in Chanpabani and Duttapur area, the density ofBacillus in soil was highest during monsoon. The estimated marginal mean analysis showed that in summer theBacillus population was comparatively higher than other seasons of the year. The winter showed relatively lower population density ofBacillus spp. in the villages of coastal areas of Digha, West Bengal, India (Table 1). The two-way ANOVA was carried out to determine the variation ofBacillus spp. according to different places and different seasons. It was found that the population of theBacillus spp. significantly varied according to different habitat and as well as different seasons (p
<
0.05). Agglomerative hierarchial cluster analysis showed that the density pattern ofBacillus spp. in summer and rainy season was significantly different from winter season (Figure 2(a)). In terms of density pattern in different places, Jatimati and Padima; Duttapur and Bhagibaharampur; Somaibasan, Gadadharpur, Palsandapur, and Gobindabasan; Chanpabani formed four different clusters (Figure 2(b)). Principal component analysis (PCA) exhibited two factors having the Eigenvalues of 1.727 and 0.970 that explained more than 89% (component 1, 57.56%, and component 2, 32.32%) of the variance on the microbial abundance in different seasons (Figure 3).Table 1
Seasonal diversity (×106 ± S.E cfu/g dry soil) of Bacillus spp. in some villages of coastal areas of Digha, West Bengal, India.
Place
Summer
Monsoon
Winter
Padima
0.183 ± 0.010
0.139 ± 0.005
0.104 ± 0.013
Jatimati
0.211 ± 0.025
0.138 ± 0.012
0.098 ± 0.006
Chanpabani
0.010 ± 0.011
0.110 ± 0.006
0.047 ± 0.012
Palsandapur
0.216 ± 0.028
0.197 ± 0.012
0.126 ± 0.011
Bhagibaharampur
0.198 ± 0.020
0.175 ± 0.012
0.107 ± 0.011
Duttapur
0.179 ± 0.032
0.187 ± 0.009
0.099 ± 0.006
Gadadharpur
0.223 ± 0.022
0.201 ± 0.022
0.106 ± 0.013
Gobindabasan
0.234 ± 0.025
0.202 ± 0.022
0.155 ± 0.025
Somaibasan
0.236 ± 0.027
0.194 ± 0.026
0.124 ± 0.023
Results are mean of nine replications. SE: standard error.Figure 2
AHC analysis showing distribution pattern ofBacillus spp. (a) in different seasons and (b) in different places.
(a)
(b)Figure 3
PCA showing (a) the relationship in the distribution pattern ofBacillus spp. and (b) Scree plot of the factors extracted.
(a)
(b)25 strains ofBacillus spp. (DSB1–DSB25) were isolated from the soil samples collected from the study area throughout the year. Colony characteristics of the isolatedBacillus spp. are shown in Table 2. The scanning electron micrographs of the isolates showed the morphology of the vegetative body, spores, and crystals (if present) (Figure 4). NaCl tolerance, pH tolerance, and temperature tolerance level of the isolates are shown in Figure 5.Table 2
Colony characteristics∗ of the Bacillus spp. isolated from the coastal areas of Digha, West Bengal, India.
Isolate number
Form
Colour
Elevation
Margin
Size (mm)
Consistency
DSB1
Circular
Off-white
Convex
Undulate
2.0 × 2.5
Gummy
DSB2
Irregular
Off-white
Convex
Entire
1.5 × 2.5
Gummy
DSB3
Circular
Pale yellow
Convex
Entire
1.5 × 2.5
Gummy
DSB4
Circular
Off-white
Convex
Entire
3.5 × 3.5
Gummy
DSB5
Circular
Pale yellow
Convex
Entire
1.0 × 2.0
Gummy
DSB6
Circular
Light yellow
Convex
Entire
1.0 × 2.0
Gummy
DSB7
circular
Off-white
Flat
Undulate
2.0 × 2.5
Gummy
DSB8
Circular
Off-white
Convex
Entire
2.0 × 3.0
Gummy
DSB9
Irregular
Off-white
Convex
Undulate
1.5 × 2.0
Gummy
DSB10
Irregular
Off-white
Flat
Undulate
2.5 × 3.5
Gummy
DSB11
Circular
Off-white
Convex
Entire
4.0 × 4.0
Gummy
DSB12
Spindle
Brownish
Convex
Entire
3.0 × 3.5
Gummy
DSB13
Irregular
Off-white
Convex
Undulate
2.0 × 2.5
Gummy
DSB14
Circular
Off-white
Convex
Undulate
1.5 × 2.5
Gummy
DSB15
Circular
Off-white
Convex
Entire
3.0 × 3.0
Gummy
DSB16
Circular
Pale yellow
Convex
Entire
1.5 × 2.0
Gummy
DSB17
Circular
Off-white
Convex
Slightly serrated
1.0 × 2.0
Gummy
DSB18
Circular
Pale yellow
Convex
Entire
2.5 × 3.5
Gummy
DSB19
Circular
Light yellow
Convex
Entire
2.0 × 2.5
Gummy
DSB20
Spindle
Brownish
Convex
Undulate
3.0 × 3.5
Gummy
DSB21
Irregular
Off-white
Convex
Entire
3.0 × 3.5
Gummy
DSB22
Circular
Pale yellow
Convex
Entire
2.0 × 2.5
Gummy
DSB23
Circular
Off-white
Convex
Slightly serrated
1.5 × 2.5
Gummy
DSB24
Circular
Pale brown
Convex
Entire
1.5 × 2.5
Gummy
DSB25
Circular
Off-white
Convex
Entire
1.0–2.0
Gummy
∗Colony characteristics were observed from the colonies grown in Nutrient Agar medium.Figure 4
Scanning electron micrographs of theBacillus spp. showing vegetative body, spores, and crystals (if present).Figure 5
Line and bar diagrams showing (a) pH tolerance, (b) temperature tolerance, and (c) NaCl tolerance level of the isolatedBacillus spp.
(a)
(b)
(c)Results obtained from the biochemical tests of these 25 isolates were shown in Table3. All the isolates were positive for catalase test but negative for citrate, indole, chitinase, and lecithinase tests. Fermentation ability of the isolates to different carbohydrate sources was depicted in Table 4. All of the isolatedBacillus spp. could ferment glucose, sucrose, mannose, and arabinose, but none of them could ferment xylose and esculin present in the nutrient broth medium. Total carbohydrate, protein, and DNA content of the isolatedBacillus spp. were shown in Figure 6. Table 5 represents the antibiotic sensitivity of the isolatedBacillus spp. against different standard antibiotics. From the scanning electron images and biochemical characteristics, the isolates were identified asBacillus spp. and among them, the crystal producing DSB1, DSB2, DSB4, DSB6, DSB7, DSB11, DSB12, DSB13, DSB15, DSB17, DSB18, DSB19, DSB20, DSB22, DSB23, and DSB24 was identified asBacillus thuringiensis.Table 3
Biochemical characterization of theBacillus spp. isolated from the coastal areas of Digha, West Bengal, India.
Isolate number
Catalase
MR
VP
Nitrate
Citrate
Indole
Oxidase
Urease
Starch
Casein
Gelatin
Chitinase
Lecithinase
Lipase
Tween 20
Tween 80
DSB1
+
+
−
−
−
−
+
+
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
DSB2
+
+
−
+
−
−
−
+
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
DSB3
+
+
−
+
−
−
−
+
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
DSB4
+
+
−
−
−
−
−
+
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
DSB5
+
+
−
+
−
−
+
+
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
DSB6
+
+
−
+
−
−
+
−
+
+
−
−
−
+
−
+
DSB7
+
+
−
+
−
−
+
−
−
−
+w
−
−
−
−
−
DSB8
+
+
−
+
−
−
+
+
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
DSB9
+
+
−
−
−
−
+
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
DSB10
+
+
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
DSB11
+
+
−
+
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
DSB12
+
+
−
+w
−
−
+
+
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
DSB13
+
+
−
−
−
−
+
+
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
DSB14
+
+
−
−
−
−
+
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
DSB15
+
+
−
+
−
−
+
+
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
DSB16
+
+
+
−
−
−
−
−
+
−
+
−
−
+
−
−
DSB17
+
−
−
+
−
−
+
−
+
+
+
−
−
+
+
−
DSB18
+
+
+
+
−
−
−
−
+
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
DSB19
+
+
+
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
+
−
+
DSB20
+
+
+
+
−
−
−
−
+
−
+
−
−
+
−
−
DSB21
+
+
+
+
−
−
−
−
+
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
DSB22
+
+
+
+
−
−
+
−
−
−
+
−
−
−
−
−
DSB23
+
+
+
+
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
+
+
−
DSB24
+
+
+
+w
−
−
−
−
−
−
+
−
−
+
−
−
DSB25
+
−
−
+w
−
−
+
−
+
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
MR: methyl red, VP: Voges-Proskauer, “+”: positive, “−”: negative, and “+w”: weakly positive.Table 4
Fermentation tests of theBacillus spp. isolated from the coastal areas of Digha, West Bengal, India.
Carbohydrate source
Positive
Negative
Glucose, sucrose, mannose, and arabinose
DSB1, DSB2, DSB3, DSB4, DSB5, DSB6, DSB7, DSB8, DSB9, DSB10, DSB11, DSB12, DSB13, DSB14, DSB15, DSB16, DSB17, DSB18, DSB19, DSB20, DSB21, DSB22, DSB23, DSB24, and DSB25
Xylose and esculin
DSB1, DSB2, DSB3, DSB4, DSB5, DSB6, DSB7, DSB8, DSB9, DSB10, DSB11, DSB12, DSB13, DSB14, DSB15, DSB16, DSB17, DSB18, DSB19, DSB20, DSB21, DSB22, DSB23, DSB24, and DSB25
Fructose
DSB2, DSB3, DSB5, DSB6, DSB7, DSB9, DSB10, DSB11, DSB12, DSB13, DSB15, DSB16, DSB17, DSB19, DSB20, DSB21, DSB22, DSB23, and DSB25
DSB1, DSB4, DSB8, DSB14, DSB18, and DSB24
Lactose
DSB12, DSB13, DSB14, DSB15, DSB20, DSB21, DSB22, DSB23, DSB24, and DSB25
DSB1, DSB2, DSB3, DSB4, DSB5, DSB6, DSB7, DSB8, DSB9, DSB10, DSB11, DSB16, DSB17, DSB18, and DSB19
Salicin
DSB2, DSB18, and DSB23
DSB1, DSB3, DSB4, DSB5, DSB6, DSB7, DSB8, DSB9, DSB10, DSB11, DSB12, DSB13, DSB14, DSB15, DSB16, DSB17, DSB19, DSB20, DSB21, DSB22, DSB24, and DSB25
Mannitol
DSB3, DSB11, and DSB18
DSB1, DSB2, DSB4, DSB5, DSB6, DSB7, DSB8, DSB9, DSB10, DSB12, DSB13, DSB14, DSB15, DSB16, DSB17, DSB19, DSB20, DSB21, DSB22, DSB23, DSB24, and DSB25Table 5
Antibiotic sensitivity tests of the isolatedBacillus spp. against some standard antibiotics.
Antibiotic
Sensitive
Resistant
Amoxicillin (10μg), Chloramphenicol (30 μg), Ciprofloxacin (30 μg), Kanamycin (30 μg), Streptomycin (10 μg), Tetracycline (30 μg), Vancomycin (30 g), polymyxin B (300 units), and Bacitracin (10 units)
DSB1, DSB2, DSB3, DSB4, DSB5, DSB6, DSB7, DSB8, DSB9, DSB10, DSB11, DSB12, DSB13, DSB14, DSB15, DSB16, DSB17, DSB18, DSB19, DSB20, DSB21, DSB22, DSB23, DSB24, and DSB25
—
Ampicillin (10μg) and Nystatin (100 U)
—
DSB1, DSB2, DSB3, DSB4, DSB5, DSB6, DSB7, DSB8, DSB9, DSB10, DSB11, DSB12, DSB13, DSB14, DSB15, DSB16, DSB17, DSB18, DSB19, DSB20, DSB21, DSB22, DSB23, DSB24, and DSB25
Erythromycin (15μg)
DSB1, DSB2, DSB6, DSB7, DSB8, DSB9, DSB10, DSB12, DSB13, DSB14, DSB15, DSB16, DSB17, DSB18, DSB19, DSB21, DSB22, DSB23, DSB24, and DSB25
DSB3, DSB4, DSB5, DSB11, and DSB20
Penicillin G (10 units)
DSB2, DSB10, DSB11, DSB12, DSB13, DSB14, DSB15, DSB21, DSB22, and DSB25
DSB1, DSB3, DSB4, DSB5, DSB6, DSB7, DSB8, DSB9, DSB16, DSB17, DSB18, DSB19, DSB20, DSB23, and DSB24
Rifampicin (5μg)
DSB3, DSB4, DSB5, DSB6, DSB7, DSB8, DSB9, DSB10, DSB12, DSB13, DSB14, DSB15, DSB16, DSB17, DSB20, DSB21, DSB22, DSB23, DSB24, and DSB25
DSB1, DSB2, DSB11, DSB18, and DSB19Figure 6
Total carbohydrate, protein, and DNA content of theBacillus spp. isolated from the coastal areas of Digha, West Bengal, India.


## 4. Discussion

Bacillus spp. almost inhabit all ecological niche. Numerous species ofBacillus inhabit coastal and marine environments [19–21]. The present investigation showed that the coastal soil of Digha comprised differentBacillus spp. which was found to be similar with the study of Chatterjee et al. [22] where they assessed theBacillus population and characterized different isolates ofBacillus thuringiensis with respect to their morphological, biochemical, and crystal producing aspects. Das et al. [23] studied on different microbial population and assessedBacillus thuringiensis diversity in coastal saline soils of Orissa. Their study revealed that the spore forming bacteria were ubiquitously distributed having diverse crystal morphotypes, salt tolerance, and nitrate reducing capability. Parvathi et al. [24] studied theBacillus diversity and isolated severalBacillus spp. via biochemical and molecular characterization in the coastal environment of Cochin. Kumar et al. [25] characterized 12 efficient phosphate producingBacillus strains on the basis of their morphological and biochemical characteristics. Several colonies ofB. cereus/B. thuringiensis group were obtained from mangrove sediments and 1.7% of them were allocated toB. thuringiensis [26]. Apart from the coastal soils, Das and Dangar [27] have studied the bacterial diversity along with stress tolerantBacillus thuringiensis in the Himalayan region. The present study characterized theBacillus spp. on the basis of their biochemical and physiological properties taking account of the previous works of Park et al. [28], Joshi et al. [29], Al-Allaf [30], Azmi et al. [31], and Mondal et al. [32, 33], who also isolated and characterized differentBacillus spp. from different sources by biochemical and physiological analysis in different parts of the world. TheseBacillus spp. isolated from different sources survive the harsh conditions by producing enzymes which are newly described, stable, and industrially important [34]. Gömöryová et al. [35] studied the distribution of functional groups of microbes via BIOLOG analysis and found organic carbon as an important functional group influencing microbial diversity in soil. Physicochemical properties of soils also influenced the soil microbial diversity pattern [9, 10]. The two-way ANOVA study revealed that in Digha coastal belt theBacillus diversity varied significantly both in spatial and in temporal aspects which may be due to the variation in the microhabitat present in these areas in different seasons. The agglomerative hierarchial cluster (AHC) analysis established the correlation of the diversity ofBacillus spp. along with different places as well as different seasons in the study area. PCA analysis revealed that theBacillus population showed variable density in different seasons which supported the observation from AHC analysis.


## 5. Conclusion

In the present study it was found that the coastal soils of Digha harboured different isolates ofBacillus spp., mainlyBacillus thuringiensis providing them an appropriate milieu for their living and propagation. The population density ofBacillus spp. in the coastal soils of Digha also greatly varied spatiotemporally.Bacillus spp. constituted one of the major components of coastal bacterial communities owing to their diverse and flexible physiological and biochemical attributes. Isolation and characterization ofBacillus spp. from these soils may help in identifying previously unknown mechanisms such as diverse metabolic activities and production of different enzymes and antimicrobial substances which would be biotechnologically valuable.



---

*Source: 7924258-2016-05-12.xml*