# Seasonal Variation in Essential Oils Composition and the Biological and Pharmaceutical Protective Effects ofMentha longifolia Leaves Grown in Tunisia

Authors: Karama Zouari-Bouassida; Mohamed Trigui; Samar Makni; Lobna Jlaiel; Slim Tounsi
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

This research assessed the seasonal variation of the chemical composition and antibacterial and anticholinesterase activities of essential oils extracted fromM. longifolia leaves. The leaves organic fractions were also investigated for their biological activities and pharmacological functions. The essential oil highest yield was recorded in the spring season. Pulegone (26.92%), 1.8 cineole (21.3 %), and L-menthone (10.66 %) were determined as its major compounds in the winter season. In the spring oil, the main components were pulegone (38.2 %) and oleic and palmitic acids (23.79 % and 15. 26 %, respectively). Oxygenated monoterpenes were predominant in the two analyzed samples. The tested oils and organic extracts exhibited promising antibacterial effects against all of the tested bacterial strains. Thanks to its richness in phenolic and flavonoid compounds, the ethyl acetate fraction (Ml EtOAcF) displayed the most active DPPH scavenging ability (IC50 =12.64 μg/ml) and an interesting β-carotene bleaching inhibition (IC50 =34.75 μg/ml) making it a potential candidate for anti-inflammatory evaluation on rats. This evaluation evidenced thatM. longifoliapretreated rats showed a marked decrease in paw oedema and inflammatory cells. Additionally, a remarkable acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of the Ml EtOAcF (IC50 = 12.3μg/ml) and essential oils were also observed suggesting their neuroprotective property against Alzheimer’s disease. Moreover, it was found that its activity level was season dependent. Our investigation, therefore, clearly revealed the medicinal characteristics ofM. longifolia leave indicating their potential uses for natural remedies.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Oxidative stress is one of the biological processes involved in the development of chronic diseases like inflammation, atherosclerosis, cancer, diabetes, and neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer [1]. Antioxidant molecules play a protective role against damage induced by free radicals and they are crucial in maintaining good human health [2]. Medicinal plants have been used in developing countries as alternative treatments to solve health problems. In recent years, scientists have focused remarkably on seeking natural antioxidant molecules to protect cells and tissues from biological damage induced by oxidative stress. Plant secondary metabolites, especially polyphenols, are naturally occurring compounds largely distributed in the plant extracts [3]. They have been reported to have potential protective roles against several human diseases and disorders, thanks to their antioxidant activity and enzyme-inhibitory capacity [4]. Previous studies highlighted that the anti-inflammatory efficiency has been attributed to these natural antioxidant compounds, suggesting them to be a new alternative against cellular injury induced by oxidative stress such as inflammation [5, 6].Additionally, phenolic compound activities, acting as inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), have also been revealed and were closely correlated with their structure and could be used as effective and safe Alzheimer’s disease (AD) therapy [7]. AD results from decreasing cholinergic functions in the brain by rapid and excessive hydrolysis of acetylcholine [8]. Therefore, one of the most promising strategies for the treatment of this disease was to inhibit the AChE. Investigations of plants with an anticholinesterase action have therefore gained attention in this field. Many secondary plant metabolites have been shown to exert an anti-AChE activity [9] and therefore can be used as novel natural drugs reducing side effects and providing numerous beneficial effects on human health. Various studies are currently carried out in order to find adequate phytocompounds which can be used as activators of antioxidative defence enzyme systems to delay or suppress the cellular damage in biological systems [10, 11].Thus, natural products from plants having antioxidant capacities might be a promising alternative to generate new multitargeting bioactive compounds.The Tunisian flora is characterized by a large diversity of aromatic and medicinal plants.M. longifolia L is a perennial and aromatic herb which belongs toLamiaceae and commonly known as “hbak” in Tunisia. Total decoction ofM. longifoliaL. has been traditionally used for the treatment of many respiratory disorders such as cold, bronchitis, and sinusitis as well as gastrointestinal disorders such as stomach problems, diarrhea, and abdominal pain [12]. TheM. longifolia essential oil has also been scientifically known for its analgesic, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and antiplatelet properties [13–15].Previous studies on the chemical composition and medicinal properties ofM. longifolia have mainly focused on its crude extract and essential oil, but only few reports have dealt with the organic fractions of the plant and searched for their anti-inflammatory and anticholinesterase activities as well. The present study aimed mainly to (i) assess the essential oil content and composition ofM. longifolia with regard to time of its leaves collection; (ii) investigate the influence of the seasonal variation on the antioxidant, antibacterial, anticholinesterase capacities ofM. longifolialeave essential oils; (iii) explore thein vivo anti-inflammatory efficiency of the most active fraction, Ml EtOAcF, with reference to its phenolic compounds richness and antioxidant and antimicrobial effects.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Essential Oil Extraction and Chemical Analysis

M. longifolia fresh leaves were harvested from Jelma Sidi Bouzid (Tunisia, latitude 35.36° and longitude 9.38°). Plant samples were collected twice: during spring (April-May) and winter at the full ripening (October-November). The plant specimen was authenticated by Professor Mohamed Chaieb, and a voucher sample was kept at the Biopesticides Laboratory Herbarium of the Centre of Biotechnology of Sfax under the code number LBPes 04.The essential analysed oils in this study were extracted by hydrodistillation ofM. longifolia fresh leaves (100g) for 3 h using a Clevenger-type apparatus. The essential oils were performed in triplicate for each oil sample. The oil was extracted with dichloromethane (3×50 ml) and dried with anhydrous Na2SO4. For yield determination, the solvent was evaporated using a rotavapory vacuum evaporator (BUCHI R-200), the yields were calculated according to dry weight of the plant material. The resulting samples were transferred to opaque glass and stored at 4°C during the experimental period. TheM. longifolia essential oil was diluted inn-Hexane for gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis (GC-MS).


### 2.2. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) Analysis

GC-MS analysis of theM. longifolia essential oil was performed with an Agilent 6890N Network GC system (Agilent Technologies). The system was equipped with an HP-5 MS column having 30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.25μm film as dimensions. The used system was coupled to a mass selective detector and the carrier gas was Helium. The GC oven temperature started at 40°C and was held at 100°C for 1 min and then programmed to rise from 100 to 280°C at a rate of 5°C/min. The identification of essential oil constituents was performed by comparing their kovats index and mass spectra with those of the authentic standards stored on the Wiley Registry of Mass Spectral Data 7th edition (Agilent Technologies, Inc.) and National Institute of Standards and Technology 05 MS (NIST) library data.


### 2.3. Preparation ofM. longifolia Leaf Extracts

TheM. longifoliapowdered leaves (from winter crops) were crumbled into small parts using a blender and were macerated three times in ethanol-water (8:2, v/v). The resulting extract was filtered and ethanol was evaporated and lyophilized to yield the hydroalcoholic crude extract (Ml EtOH-H2OE). The dried hydroalcoholic crude extract (23g) was sequentially partitioned with n-hexane (3 × 350 ml) and ethyl acetate (3 × 350 ml). The filtered solution was evaporated at reduced pressure (Rotary Evaporator Buchi R-200, Switzerland) and the remaining aqueous layer was lyophilized to give the water fraction. The resulting three fractions were evaporated under vacuum to dryness to give the hexane (Ml HexF), the ethyl acetate (Ml EtOAcF), and water (Ml WF) fractions. The stock solutions were kept at 4°C in the dark until tested and analyzed.


### 2.4. Determination of Total Phenols (TPC)

The TPC in extracts was determined according to the Folin-Ciocalteu procedure with slight modifications [16]. A calibration curve was constructed using gallic acid and the results were expressed as mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g. Tests were performed in triplicate for each extract.


### 2.5. Determination of Total Flavonoids (TF)

The assay was performed spectrophotometrically following the procedure described by Quettier-Deleu et al. [17] based on the formation of a complex flavonoid-aluminium, having a maximum absorption at 430 nm. The flavonoid content was expressed in mg of quercetin equivalent per gram of dry plant extract (mg QE/g).


### 2.6.In Vitro Antioxidant Assay

#### 2.6.1. DPPH Antiradical Activity

The capacity ofM. longifolia leave extracts (essential oil; hydroethanolic extract and its fractions) to scavenge the free-radical 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) was determined according to the method described by Trigui et al. [18] with slight modifications. In Brief, a dosage of 50 μl of the extract assayed at different concentrations was added to 2 ml of a DPPH solution (0.04 g/l in methanol). The mixtures were incubated for 30 min in the dark at room temperature.The DPPH radical reduction was evaluated spectrophotometrically by continuous monitoring of the absorption decrease at 517 nm. Ascorbic acid was used as a positive control. The DPPH scavenging effect percentage was calculated using the following formulae:(1)
1
-
A
e
x
t
r
a
c
t
A
D
P
P
H
×
100where Aextract is the absorbance of the solution when an extract is added and ADPPH is the DPPH solution absorbance. The IC50 was then calculated (the fraction concentration that inhibits 50% of free radicals).


#### 2.6.2.β-Carotene Bleaching Assay

The ability of theM. longifolia leave extracts to prevent the bleaching of β-carotene was assessed as previously described by Trigui et al. [18]. A solution of β-carotene/ linoleic acid was prepared by dissolving 0.2mg of β-carotene, 20 μl of linoleic acid, and 200mg of Tween 40 in 1ml of chloroform. After chloroform evaporation under reduced pressure at 40°C, 50ml of oxygen bubbled water was slowly added to the residue and the resulting mixture was vigorously shaken. Aliquots (5ml) of the obtained emulsion was added to a tube containing 500 μl of each extract and kept in a water bath at 50°C for 120 min before measuring the absorbance at 470 nm. The butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) was used as the reference. The antioxidant activity is expressed in terms of percent inhibition using the following formula:(2)
I
n
h
i
b
i
t
i
o
n
%
=
A
β
-
carotene after 2h assay
A
initial
β
-
carotene
×
100where Aβ-carotene after 2 h assay and A initial β-carotene are the absorbance of β-carotene after 2 h assay and the absorbance of β-carotene at the beginning of the experiments, respectively. The necessary antioxidant concentration to reduce 50% of the absorbance (IC50) was determined. Tests were performed in triplicate for each extract.


### 2.7.In Vitro Antibacterial Activity

Different microorganisms, including Gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus subtilis ATCC6633, Bacillus cereus ATCC14579,Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923,Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 12228,Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212,Micrococcus luteus ATCC 1880, andListeria monocytogenes 2132) and Gram-negative bacteria (Salmonella enteritidis andKlebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 10031) were used for testing the antibacterial activities ofM. longifolia essential oils and fractions. Mueller-Hinton agar (MH) (Oxoid Ltd., UK) was used for the bacterial strains cultivation for 24 hours at the appropriated temperature. The agar-well diffusion assay was employed for this purpose [19]. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using the microdilution bioassay in 96-well microplates according to Eloff et al. [20] with minor modifications. Gentamicin was used as positive control. All tests were carried out in triplicates.


### 2.8.In Vitro Anticholinesterase Activity

The acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitory activity was carried out using the spectrophotometric method developed by Mata et al. [21] using electric eel acetylcholinesterase (EC 3.1.1.7, type VS). The absorbance of the mixture was measured at 405 nm. Acetylthiocholine iodide (AChI) was employed as substrate of the reaction and 5, 5′-Dithio-bis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB) was used for the measurement of the anticholinesterase activity. The galanthamine·HBr was used as positive control. The obtained results were expressed as IC50 values calculated as the extracts concentration that can produce 50% inhibition activity again cholinesterase.


### 2.9.In Vivo Anti-Inflammatory Test

#### 2.9.1. Animals

Wistar rats with body masses around 175 g were obtained from the Veterinary Research Institute (Sfax, Tunisia). The animals were caged under environmental conditions of humidity, temperature and dark/light cycle with free access to diet and water. The animal study was performed in accordance with the European Community guidelines (EEC directive of 1986; 86/609/EEC) for the care and use of laboratory animals in scientific research and approved by the Medical Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (Directive 2001-2133) issued by the University of Sfax Tunisia.


#### 2.9.2. Acute Toxicity Study

The acute toxicity study was performed according to the World Health Organization recommendations (2000) with some modifications. Healthy rats (175g) were randomly divided into five groups (n=10). The control group (group I) received only a solution of Tween-80 (3%), while groups II, III, IV and V were treated with Ml EtOAcF at doses of 100, 200, 400, and 800 mg/kg body weight, respectively. Following the fasting period, the graded doses of Ml EtOAcF dissolved in Tween-80 (3%), were administered orally by gavage. The animals were maintained on standard animal diet and water. All animals were daily observed for behavioral pattern, body weight, and physical appearance changes and checked for mortality during the 2-week observation period.


#### 2.9.3. Anti-Inflammatory Test: Carrageenan Induced Paw Oedema

The rats were split into four groups (n=10) pretreated, respectively, with 1 ml/kg of sterile saline solution (control group), carrageenan 1% (control group), 10 mg/kg BW of indomethacin as a standard group, and 200mg/kg of Ml EtOAcF [22]. Paw oedema was induced [23] by subcutaneous injection of 50μl of 1% w/v carrageenan solution (type IV Sigma Chemical Company, USA) into the foot pad of the right hind paw after one hour of intraperitoneal injection of plant extract and drug. The paw oedema thickness was measured at hourly interval (from 0 hour up to 5 hours) using a caliper and compared with the control group [24]. The drug efficiency and carrageenan induced oedema were estimated using the following formula:(3)
%
inhibition oedema
=
T
-
T
0
T
×
100where T represents the paw thickness in the control group and T0 the paw oedema thickness in the test compound treated group.Five hours after the carrageenan administration, the animals were anesthetized and the biopsies from the subplantar muscles of all groups of rats were collected for the paws histological examination.


### 2.10. Statistical Analysis

Data were expressed as mean values ± standard deviation (SD). A statistical significance comparison between groups was accomplished using the SPSS version 20.The mean differences between the different groups were assessed by Duncan and Tukey’s post hoc tests and compared using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Differences were considered significant atP < 0.05.


## 2.1. Essential Oil Extraction and Chemical Analysis

M. longifolia fresh leaves were harvested from Jelma Sidi Bouzid (Tunisia, latitude 35.36° and longitude 9.38°). Plant samples were collected twice: during spring (April-May) and winter at the full ripening (October-November). The plant specimen was authenticated by Professor Mohamed Chaieb, and a voucher sample was kept at the Biopesticides Laboratory Herbarium of the Centre of Biotechnology of Sfax under the code number LBPes 04.The essential analysed oils in this study were extracted by hydrodistillation ofM. longifolia fresh leaves (100g) for 3 h using a Clevenger-type apparatus. The essential oils were performed in triplicate for each oil sample. The oil was extracted with dichloromethane (3×50 ml) and dried with anhydrous Na2SO4. For yield determination, the solvent was evaporated using a rotavapory vacuum evaporator (BUCHI R-200), the yields were calculated according to dry weight of the plant material. The resulting samples were transferred to opaque glass and stored at 4°C during the experimental period. TheM. longifolia essential oil was diluted inn-Hexane for gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis (GC-MS).


## 2.2. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) Analysis

GC-MS analysis of theM. longifolia essential oil was performed with an Agilent 6890N Network GC system (Agilent Technologies). The system was equipped with an HP-5 MS column having 30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.25μm film as dimensions. The used system was coupled to a mass selective detector and the carrier gas was Helium. The GC oven temperature started at 40°C and was held at 100°C for 1 min and then programmed to rise from 100 to 280°C at a rate of 5°C/min. The identification of essential oil constituents was performed by comparing their kovats index and mass spectra with those of the authentic standards stored on the Wiley Registry of Mass Spectral Data 7th edition (Agilent Technologies, Inc.) and National Institute of Standards and Technology 05 MS (NIST) library data.


## 2.3. Preparation ofM. longifolia Leaf Extracts

TheM. longifoliapowdered leaves (from winter crops) were crumbled into small parts using a blender and were macerated three times in ethanol-water (8:2, v/v). The resulting extract was filtered and ethanol was evaporated and lyophilized to yield the hydroalcoholic crude extract (Ml EtOH-H2OE). The dried hydroalcoholic crude extract (23g) was sequentially partitioned with n-hexane (3 × 350 ml) and ethyl acetate (3 × 350 ml). The filtered solution was evaporated at reduced pressure (Rotary Evaporator Buchi R-200, Switzerland) and the remaining aqueous layer was lyophilized to give the water fraction. The resulting three fractions were evaporated under vacuum to dryness to give the hexane (Ml HexF), the ethyl acetate (Ml EtOAcF), and water (Ml WF) fractions. The stock solutions were kept at 4°C in the dark until tested and analyzed.


## 2.4. Determination of Total Phenols (TPC)

The TPC in extracts was determined according to the Folin-Ciocalteu procedure with slight modifications [16]. A calibration curve was constructed using gallic acid and the results were expressed as mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g. Tests were performed in triplicate for each extract.


## 2.5. Determination of Total Flavonoids (TF)

The assay was performed spectrophotometrically following the procedure described by Quettier-Deleu et al. [17] based on the formation of a complex flavonoid-aluminium, having a maximum absorption at 430 nm. The flavonoid content was expressed in mg of quercetin equivalent per gram of dry plant extract (mg QE/g).


## 2.6.In Vitro Antioxidant Assay

### 2.6.1. DPPH Antiradical Activity

The capacity ofM. longifolia leave extracts (essential oil; hydroethanolic extract and its fractions) to scavenge the free-radical 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) was determined according to the method described by Trigui et al. [18] with slight modifications. In Brief, a dosage of 50 μl of the extract assayed at different concentrations was added to 2 ml of a DPPH solution (0.04 g/l in methanol). The mixtures were incubated for 30 min in the dark at room temperature.The DPPH radical reduction was evaluated spectrophotometrically by continuous monitoring of the absorption decrease at 517 nm. Ascorbic acid was used as a positive control. The DPPH scavenging effect percentage was calculated using the following formulae:(1)
1
-
A
e
x
t
r
a
c
t
A
D
P
P
H
×
100where Aextract is the absorbance of the solution when an extract is added and ADPPH is the DPPH solution absorbance. The IC50 was then calculated (the fraction concentration that inhibits 50% of free radicals).


### 2.6.2.β-Carotene Bleaching Assay

The ability of theM. longifolia leave extracts to prevent the bleaching of β-carotene was assessed as previously described by Trigui et al. [18]. A solution of β-carotene/ linoleic acid was prepared by dissolving 0.2mg of β-carotene, 20 μl of linoleic acid, and 200mg of Tween 40 in 1ml of chloroform. After chloroform evaporation under reduced pressure at 40°C, 50ml of oxygen bubbled water was slowly added to the residue and the resulting mixture was vigorously shaken. Aliquots (5ml) of the obtained emulsion was added to a tube containing 500 μl of each extract and kept in a water bath at 50°C for 120 min before measuring the absorbance at 470 nm. The butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) was used as the reference. The antioxidant activity is expressed in terms of percent inhibition using the following formula:(2)
I
n
h
i
b
i
t
i
o
n
%
=
A
β
-
carotene after 2h assay
A
initial
β
-
carotene
×
100where Aβ-carotene after 2 h assay and A initial β-carotene are the absorbance of β-carotene after 2 h assay and the absorbance of β-carotene at the beginning of the experiments, respectively. The necessary antioxidant concentration to reduce 50% of the absorbance (IC50) was determined. Tests were performed in triplicate for each extract.


## 2.6.1. DPPH Antiradical Activity

The capacity ofM. longifolia leave extracts (essential oil; hydroethanolic extract and its fractions) to scavenge the free-radical 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) was determined according to the method described by Trigui et al. [18] with slight modifications. In Brief, a dosage of 50 μl of the extract assayed at different concentrations was added to 2 ml of a DPPH solution (0.04 g/l in methanol). The mixtures were incubated for 30 min in the dark at room temperature.The DPPH radical reduction was evaluated spectrophotometrically by continuous monitoring of the absorption decrease at 517 nm. Ascorbic acid was used as a positive control. The DPPH scavenging effect percentage was calculated using the following formulae:(1)
1
-
A
e
x
t
r
a
c
t
A
D
P
P
H
×
100where Aextract is the absorbance of the solution when an extract is added and ADPPH is the DPPH solution absorbance. The IC50 was then calculated (the fraction concentration that inhibits 50% of free radicals).


## 2.6.2.β-Carotene Bleaching Assay

The ability of theM. longifolia leave extracts to prevent the bleaching of β-carotene was assessed as previously described by Trigui et al. [18]. A solution of β-carotene/ linoleic acid was prepared by dissolving 0.2mg of β-carotene, 20 μl of linoleic acid, and 200mg of Tween 40 in 1ml of chloroform. After chloroform evaporation under reduced pressure at 40°C, 50ml of oxygen bubbled water was slowly added to the residue and the resulting mixture was vigorously shaken. Aliquots (5ml) of the obtained emulsion was added to a tube containing 500 μl of each extract and kept in a water bath at 50°C for 120 min before measuring the absorbance at 470 nm. The butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) was used as the reference. The antioxidant activity is expressed in terms of percent inhibition using the following formula:(2)
I
n
h
i
b
i
t
i
o
n
%
=
A
β
-
carotene after 2h assay
A
initial
β
-
carotene
×
100where Aβ-carotene after 2 h assay and A initial β-carotene are the absorbance of β-carotene after 2 h assay and the absorbance of β-carotene at the beginning of the experiments, respectively. The necessary antioxidant concentration to reduce 50% of the absorbance (IC50) was determined. Tests were performed in triplicate for each extract.


## 2.7.In Vitro Antibacterial Activity

Different microorganisms, including Gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus subtilis ATCC6633, Bacillus cereus ATCC14579,Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923,Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 12228,Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212,Micrococcus luteus ATCC 1880, andListeria monocytogenes 2132) and Gram-negative bacteria (Salmonella enteritidis andKlebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 10031) were used for testing the antibacterial activities ofM. longifolia essential oils and fractions. Mueller-Hinton agar (MH) (Oxoid Ltd., UK) was used for the bacterial strains cultivation for 24 hours at the appropriated temperature. The agar-well diffusion assay was employed for this purpose [19]. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using the microdilution bioassay in 96-well microplates according to Eloff et al. [20] with minor modifications. Gentamicin was used as positive control. All tests were carried out in triplicates.


## 2.8.In Vitro Anticholinesterase Activity

The acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitory activity was carried out using the spectrophotometric method developed by Mata et al. [21] using electric eel acetylcholinesterase (EC 3.1.1.7, type VS). The absorbance of the mixture was measured at 405 nm. Acetylthiocholine iodide (AChI) was employed as substrate of the reaction and 5, 5′-Dithio-bis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB) was used for the measurement of the anticholinesterase activity. The galanthamine·HBr was used as positive control. The obtained results were expressed as IC50 values calculated as the extracts concentration that can produce 50% inhibition activity again cholinesterase.


## 2.9.In Vivo Anti-Inflammatory Test

### 2.9.1. Animals

Wistar rats with body masses around 175 g were obtained from the Veterinary Research Institute (Sfax, Tunisia). The animals were caged under environmental conditions of humidity, temperature and dark/light cycle with free access to diet and water. The animal study was performed in accordance with the European Community guidelines (EEC directive of 1986; 86/609/EEC) for the care and use of laboratory animals in scientific research and approved by the Medical Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (Directive 2001-2133) issued by the University of Sfax Tunisia.


### 2.9.2. Acute Toxicity Study

The acute toxicity study was performed according to the World Health Organization recommendations (2000) with some modifications. Healthy rats (175g) were randomly divided into five groups (n=10). The control group (group I) received only a solution of Tween-80 (3%), while groups II, III, IV and V were treated with Ml EtOAcF at doses of 100, 200, 400, and 800 mg/kg body weight, respectively. Following the fasting period, the graded doses of Ml EtOAcF dissolved in Tween-80 (3%), were administered orally by gavage. The animals were maintained on standard animal diet and water. All animals were daily observed for behavioral pattern, body weight, and physical appearance changes and checked for mortality during the 2-week observation period.


### 2.9.3. Anti-Inflammatory Test: Carrageenan Induced Paw Oedema

The rats were split into four groups (n=10) pretreated, respectively, with 1 ml/kg of sterile saline solution (control group), carrageenan 1% (control group), 10 mg/kg BW of indomethacin as a standard group, and 200mg/kg of Ml EtOAcF [22]. Paw oedema was induced [23] by subcutaneous injection of 50μl of 1% w/v carrageenan solution (type IV Sigma Chemical Company, USA) into the foot pad of the right hind paw after one hour of intraperitoneal injection of plant extract and drug. The paw oedema thickness was measured at hourly interval (from 0 hour up to 5 hours) using a caliper and compared with the control group [24]. The drug efficiency and carrageenan induced oedema were estimated using the following formula:(3)
%
inhibition oedema
=
T
-
T
0
T
×
100where T represents the paw thickness in the control group and T0 the paw oedema thickness in the test compound treated group.Five hours after the carrageenan administration, the animals were anesthetized and the biopsies from the subplantar muscles of all groups of rats were collected for the paws histological examination.


## 2.9.1. Animals

Wistar rats with body masses around 175 g were obtained from the Veterinary Research Institute (Sfax, Tunisia). The animals were caged under environmental conditions of humidity, temperature and dark/light cycle with free access to diet and water. The animal study was performed in accordance with the European Community guidelines (EEC directive of 1986; 86/609/EEC) for the care and use of laboratory animals in scientific research and approved by the Medical Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (Directive 2001-2133) issued by the University of Sfax Tunisia.


## 2.9.2. Acute Toxicity Study

The acute toxicity study was performed according to the World Health Organization recommendations (2000) with some modifications. Healthy rats (175g) were randomly divided into five groups (n=10). The control group (group I) received only a solution of Tween-80 (3%), while groups II, III, IV and V were treated with Ml EtOAcF at doses of 100, 200, 400, and 800 mg/kg body weight, respectively. Following the fasting period, the graded doses of Ml EtOAcF dissolved in Tween-80 (3%), were administered orally by gavage. The animals were maintained on standard animal diet and water. All animals were daily observed for behavioral pattern, body weight, and physical appearance changes and checked for mortality during the 2-week observation period.


## 2.9.3. Anti-Inflammatory Test: Carrageenan Induced Paw Oedema

The rats were split into four groups (n=10) pretreated, respectively, with 1 ml/kg of sterile saline solution (control group), carrageenan 1% (control group), 10 mg/kg BW of indomethacin as a standard group, and 200mg/kg of Ml EtOAcF [22]. Paw oedema was induced [23] by subcutaneous injection of 50μl of 1% w/v carrageenan solution (type IV Sigma Chemical Company, USA) into the foot pad of the right hind paw after one hour of intraperitoneal injection of plant extract and drug. The paw oedema thickness was measured at hourly interval (from 0 hour up to 5 hours) using a caliper and compared with the control group [24]. The drug efficiency and carrageenan induced oedema were estimated using the following formula:(3)
%
inhibition oedema
=
T
-
T
0
T
×
100where T represents the paw thickness in the control group and T0 the paw oedema thickness in the test compound treated group.Five hours after the carrageenan administration, the animals were anesthetized and the biopsies from the subplantar muscles of all groups of rats were collected for the paws histological examination.


## 2.10. Statistical Analysis

Data were expressed as mean values ± standard deviation (SD). A statistical significance comparison between groups was accomplished using the SPSS version 20.The mean differences between the different groups were assessed by Duncan and Tukey’s post hoc tests and compared using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Differences were considered significant atP < 0.05.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Seasonal Variation inM. longifolia Essential Oil

The oil yield-revealed data are shown in Table1. The largest amount of oil was found during the winter season corresponding to the flowering stage (2.5%) whereas theM. longifolia oil content decreased significantly (P < 0.05) in the spring season to reach 0.5%. The results revealed that essential oil accumulation inM. longifolia appears to be metabolically regulated during vegetative and flowering stages of crop growth. Such results were expected as the flowering stage is well known to be the most suitable for essential oil extraction compared to vegetative stage [25] and were in agreement with other research findings reporting a maximum essential oil yield during flowering stage [26]. It was also shown by Hussain et al. [27] that many testedMentha species revealed higher essential oil yield when the plants were in full bloom than when they reached the end of their growth cycle. The climatic factors variability such as temperature, total duration of exposure to sun, and precipitation could directly influence the oil yield during the two harvesting seasons [28, 29]. It was reported that the temperature influenced the oil yield ofO. basilicum with the highest yields in the winter season [30].Table 1
Yields extracts, amounts of total flavonoids, total phenolic compounds, and determined IC50 values of the DPPH free radical scavenging assay of M. longifolialeave extracts and essential oil. Ascorbic acid was used as positive control.
Extracts
Yield (
%
)
TPC
mg GAE/g
TF
mg QE/g
DPPH
IC
50
(
μ
g/ml)
β
carotene
IC
50
(
μ
g/ml)
Ml EtOH-H2OE
12.46
59.25±0.38
18.23±0.35
16.23 ± 1.60
66.75± 0.57
Ml HexF
7.35
nd
nd
> 1000
>1000
Ml EtAOcF
2.5
99.72±1.26
20.85 ± 0.94
12.64± 0.21
34.75 ± 0.76
Ml WF
2.61
45.25 ± 0.87
10.75 ± 0.47
47.71± 0.43
56.31± 0.67
EO
s-EO
w
0.5-2.5
-
-
> 100
> 100
Ascorbic acid
-
-
-
3.50
-
TPC: total phenolic content; TF: flavonoid content.
mg GAE /g: mg of gallic acid equivalent per g of dry plant extract.
mg QE/g: mg of quercetin equivalent per g of dry plant extract.
IC50 (μg/ml): the IC50 values corresponding to the amount of extract required to scavenge 50 % of radicals present in the reaction mixture.
nd: not detected.
EO
w: essential oil extracted at winter season; EO
s: spring essential oil.The mean percentage composition of total identified compounds of essential oils collected through the two seasons and used in bioassays are presented in Table2. A total of eighteen and sixteen compounds, accounting for 89.91 and 97.95 % of the total content, were identified in the essential oils obtained from winter and spring leaves, respectively. The oxygenated monoterpenes fraction dominated the two essential oils samples.Table 2
Seasonal variation in content and chemical composition of essential oils from leaves ofM. longifolia.
Component
A
Rt (min)
B
KI
C
%
Area
Spring
Winter
Monoterpene hydrocarbons
α-pinene
8.557
941
0.12±0.008b
0.93±0.02a
camphene
9.764
953
0.18±0.03b
0.41±0.008a
β-pinene
9.827
978
0.24±0.02b
1.22±0.05a
Oxygenated monoterpenes
1,8 cineole
11.492
1030
2.37±0.16b
21.3±0.24a
L-menthone
15.206
1152
4.68±0.2b
10.66±0.1a
Iso-menthone
15.429
1163
0.16±0.008b
8.69±0.12a
Borneol
15.503
1166
2.6±0.02a
1.87±0.04b
Menthol
15.801
1171
4.29±0.2a
0b
Cis-isopulegone
17.960
1175
0b
0.86±0.04a
Pulegone
18.349
1237
38.2±0.28a
26.92±0.53b
Piperitone
19.539
1251
0b
0.82±0.1a
Piperitenone
21.324
1340
1.18±0.12b
9.62±0.2a
cis-Jasmone
22.406
1400
0b
0.45±0.02a
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons
trans-Caryophyllene
22.949
1419
0.87±0.04b
2.7±0.1a
D-germacrene
24.046
1482
0.34±0.008a
0b
gamma.-Cadinene
25.106
1514
0b
0.52±0.08a
d-Cadinene
27.607
1523
0.4±0.006a
0b
delta.-Selinene
27.857
1578
0b
0.30±0a
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes
alpha.-Humulene
23.659
1454
0b
0.2±0a
alpha.-Cadinol
28.196
1654
0b
2.81±0.05a
Esters
Geranyl tiglate
29.260
1685
0b
0.24±0.008a
Fatty Acids
Palmitic acid
34.729
1927
15.26±0.2a
0b
Oleic acid
38.002
2128
23.79±0.5a
0b
Linoleic acid
38.317
2173
3.27±0.01a
0b
Total compound
97.95
89.91
ACompounds listed in order of elution from a HP-5 MS column.
BRetention time (as minutes).
CK.I. Kovats Index on HP-5MS column in reference to n-alkanes.
Values in the same line with different subscript (a > b) are significantly different within season (P< 0.05).The content of oxygenated monoterpenes in the essential oils was higher during the winter (81.19%) and lower during the spring (53.48%). Apart from the similarity in the major compound, the oils collected in winter and spring showed notably quantitative differences. In the winter crops, the prominent components were pulegone (26.92%), L-menthone (10.66 %), and 1,8 cineole (21.3 %). However, the major constituents in the spring oil were found to be pulegone (38.2 %) and fatty acids. This oil harbors also menthone (4.68%), menthol (4.29%), and 1,8 cineole (2.37%) but with less quantities. Fatty acids, not detectable in the winter oil, were represented mainly by oleic acid (23.79%) and palmitic acid (15.26%) and to a lesser extent by linoleic acid (3.27%) in the postflowering stage essential oil. Moreover, the testedM. longifolia essential oils contained significant amounts of several minor constituents, as seen in Table 2, including sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, oxygenated sesquiterpenes, and esters.The variation in the composition of theM. longifolia essential oils investigated in this study was quantitatively significant (P < 0.05). Most fluctuations in the essential oil components includes oxygenated monoterpenes, namely, pulegone (26.92-38.2%), 1, 8 cineole (2.37-21.3 %), L- Menthone (4.68-10.66 %), β pinene (0.24-1.22), α pinene (0.12-0.93 %), cis iso-pulegone (0-0.86 %), and piperitenone (1.18-9.62 %) from spring and winter, respectively. The yield of most of the compounds was higher in the flowering stage (winter), while pulegone was found to be high in the spring plant collection.Our findings are in line with those of Gazim et al. [31], who stated essential oil composition variation obtained fromTetradenia riparia (Lamiaceae) leaves at different seasons. The oxygenated monoterpenes and oxygenated sesquiterpenes contents were high during the winter and low during the spring-summer.The seasonal variations in content and chemical composition ofM. longifolia essential oil across countries have been attributed to environmental factors (climate/weather, soil/nutrition) that can influence the regulation of the essential oil biosynthesis [32]. Just like our results, previous investigations have demonstrated that the harvesting season can alter the chemical composition of the essential oils ofM. longifolia [30].Thus, based on these results and previous works we can conclude that the ingredients ofM. longifolia essential oil revealed a variation in its constituents depending on geographical and environmental factors and harvest time. Indeed, the adaptive metabolism of the plant influences the quality, the quantity and the chemical composition of the plant essential oil and could probably contribute to create a unique and specific chemical composition.Several previous reports from the literature show the qualitative and the quantitative analyses ofMentha longifolia essential oil from different countries [33–35].


### 3.2. Total Phenolics (TPC) and Flavonoids (TFC)

The quantitative estimation of TPC of theM. longifolia leave extracts (Table 1) showed that they are upper than their TFC amounts. The content of these secondary metabolites depends on the type of solvent used for the extraction with varying polarity.The Ml EtAOcF was found to contain the highest amount of phenolics (99.72 ± 1.26 mg GAE/g) compared to Ml EtOH-H2O extract (59.25 ± 0.38 mg GAE/g) and Ml WF (45.25 ± 0.87 mg GAE/g). The Ml EtAOcF also contained the highest flavonoid concentration (20.85 ± 0.94 mg QE/g), 2-fold more than Ml WF with 10.75 ± 0.47 (Table 1). The higher TPC and TFC values obtained with the ethyl acetate can be attributed to its good phenolic solubility and the high extraction capacity [36]. These metabolites showed differences in their concentrations in terms of solvents polarities and therefore their solubility which depends on their structures and polymerization degree [37].


### 3.3. Anticholinesterase Inhibition Assay

The acetylcholinesterase inhibitors are one of the most effective approaches to treat the cognitive symptoms of the Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Table3 shows the antiacetylcholinesterase capacity of essential oils and organic extracts ofM. longifolia, compared with those of galantamine used as a standard inhibitor.Table 3
Acetylcholinesterase inhibition capacity represented by IC50 (μg/ml) of essential oils and organics extracts of Mentha longifolia.
Extracts
Percentage of inhibition IC
50
(
μ
g/ml)
Ml HexF
934± 42.3c
Ml EtOH-H2OE
54.25 ± 1.10a
b
Ml EtOAc-F
12.3± 0.71a
Ml WF
85.68 ± 3.4b
EO
W
21.9± 1.14a
EO
S
49.3± 1.56a
b
Galanthamine∗
19.90 ± 1.48a
Averages ± SD were obtained from three different experiments.
∗Standard drug.
EOw: essential oil extracted at winter season; EOs: spring essential oil.
Values in the same line with different subscript (a > b > c) are significantly different within season (P <0.05).Based on IC50 values, all the extracts exhibited acetylcholinesterase inhibitory ability in the following order: Ml EtOAcF > Ml EtOH-H2OE > Ml WF > Ml HexF. The uppermost inhibitory activity was recorded with the Ml EtOAcF (IC50 = 12.30 μg/mL). Besides, it is clearly shown that AChE inhibitory activity ofM. longifolia essential oils varied significantly along their harvesting time. Table 3 shows that the essential oil extracted at the flowering stage (winter crops) exhibited the greatest inhibitory effect against AChE with an IC50 of 21.9μg/ml. Previous studies reported that theM. longifolia leaves essential oils have an acetylcholinesterase inhibitory capacity [38]. However, so far, and to the authors best knowledge, this is the first attempt that explores the seasonal variation of the AChE inhibitory capacity ofM. longifolia essential oils.Monoterpenes, reported inM. longifoliaessential oils, are known for their biological activities and beneficial effects [39]. Numerous essential oils and their isolated monoterpenes have been investigated for their effects on AChE. It was proven that purified 1.8-cineole, a monoterpene one of the major compounds of winterM. longifoliaessential oil, exhibited a potent inhibitory capacity on AChE activity and showed synergistic effect with other constituents [40]. It was reported by Mata et al. [21] that the essential oils of the twoMenthaspecies,M. pulegium andM. spicata, exhibited only moderate AChE inhibition with an IC50 of 324 and 357 μg/ml, respectively. The main components of these oils were pulegone and carvone. These compounds are reported as moderate inhibitors of AChE [41]. According to previous observed data, the AChE inhibition in our case byM. longifoliaessential oil (IC50 = 21.9 μg/ml) led to the suggestion that the activity is probably due to the synergistic effects of several components major and minor ones mainly monoterpenoids.On the other hand, the Ml EtOAcF was found to be more effective in the AChE inhibition than essential oils. Differently, Lopez et al. [42] reported an insignificant inhibition of organic extracts ofM. longifolia on this enzyme.Plants have been traditionally used to enhance cognitive functions and alleviate other symptoms nowadays associated with Alzheimer’s disease [43]. Most of the drugs used in Alzheimer therapy are formed by an enzyme inhibitor, e.g., galanthamine, isolated from the snowdrop extract [44]. There has been a lot of research on the biological effect of plants traditionally used as acetylcholinesterase inhibitorsin vitroand also as memory enhancersin vivo[45, 46]. The great inhibitory effect of Ml EtOAcF made us think that this fraction contains neuroprotective phytochemical molecules like phenolic active compounds which could be responsible for the plant potent anti-AChE activity. The AChE inhibition efficacy of Ml EtOAcF observed in this work comes probably from its richness in various effective chemical compounds present in the extract such as phenolic acids and flavonoids, proven to have an inhibitory ability against key enzymes involved in the cholinergic nervous system [47]. The bioactive compounds can act synergistically or individually to induce an AChE inhibitory activity. Further analyses have to be performed to delineate rationally the Ml EtOAcF active compound(s).


### 3.4. Evaluation of Antioxidant Activity: DPPH andβ Carotene Tests

The effect of the differentM. longifoliaorganic extracts and essential oils on DPPH radical scavenging capacity was evaluated by the determination of the IC50 values and then compared to the ascorbic acid used as positive control. Based on the IC50 values, the best activities were recorded with Ml EtOAcF (IC50= 12.64 μg/ml), followed by Ml EtOH-H2OE (IC50 = 16.23 μg/ml) and then by Ml WF (IC50 = 47.71± 0.43μg/ml). The Ml HexF showed a poor radical scavenging activity with an IC50 value more than 1000 μg/ml (Table 1). The Ml EtOAcF showed an interesting free-radical scavenging. Ascorbic acid showed a potent antioxidant activity with an IC50 value of 3.5 μg/ml (Table 1).Both samples ofM. longifoliaessential oil showed a weak DPPH radical scavenging activity with an IC50 value more than 100 μg/ml when compared to the organic extracts. Our results are in accordance with the findings of Gulluce et al. [48] who reported thatM. longifoliamethanol extract (obtained at the flowering stage) was more effective in scavenging DPPH free radical than the essential oil. The antiradical efficiency due to a hydrogen atom transferring reaction showed a positive correlation with phenolics content (R2 = 0.987) and therefore their implication inM. longifoliaantiradical activity.A wide variation in the antioxidant activity ofM. longifoliawas observed in the literature. Mkaddem et al. [49] showed a moderate IC50 value of essential oil (> 8000 mg/ml) assayed by DPPH. It was also found that the IC50 value of the methanol extract of TurkishM. longifolia was in the range of 57.4 μg/ ml [48]. In addition, a lower IC50 of methanol extract in the range of 20 μg/ml was obtained by Hajlaoui et al. [50].AllM. longifoliaorganic extracts inhibited the β-carotene oxidation except for essential oils. The Ml EtOAcF exhibited a strong activity with IC50 values of 34.75 μg/ml compared to those of the essential oils (IC50 > 100 μg/ml). The inhibition of lipid peroxidation by addition ofM. longifoliaorganic extracts could be used to improve the quality and stability of food products. These extracts are able to quenching peroxide radicals and to terminate the peroxidation chain reaction.These results suggest thatM. longifolia leaves are promising sources of various bioactive compounds for human health. The results obtained for antioxidant properties in this work are in agreement with earlier results of other authors [34, 48].


### 3.5. Antibacterial Activity

The inhibitory spectra of the essential oils seasonally extracted fromM. longifolia and its organic extracts were evaluated against nine pathogenic bacteria by the presence or absence of inhibition zones followed by MIC and MBC values measurement (Table 4).Table 4
Season variation in antibacterial activity ofM. longifoliaessential oils against the bacterial strains tested. EO
w: essential oil extracted at winter season; EO
s: spring essential oil.
(a)
Bacterial strains
Extracts
Ml EtOcF
Ml EtOH-H
2
OE
E
O
W
E
O
S
Genta
∗
Diameter of inhibition zone (mm)
Gram
+
B. subtilis ATCC 6633
27±0.1a
14±0.2c
26.3±0.0a
11±0.5d
20±0.2b
B. cereus ATCC 14579
17±0.3c
12±0.8e
26±0.2a
14±0.6d
20±0.4b
S. aureus ATCC 25923
25±0.0a
13±0.6b
24.9±0.3a
14.6±0.5b
25±0.8a
S. epidemis ATCC 12228
24±0.6a
20±0.3b
14±0.4c
13±0.0c
20±0.5b
E. faecalis ATCC 29212
18±0.1b
0d
20±0.3a
12±0.1c
12±0.2c
M. luteus ATCC 1880
21±0.4a
18±0.5b
15±0.6c
15±0.6c
20±0.7a
L. monocytogenes (food isolate 2132)
19±0.2a
18±0.1a
13.16 ±0.4c
12.60 ±0.9c
15±0.0b
Gram
-
S. enteritidis  (food isolate)
24±0.2a
14±0.3c
10±0.12d
11.3±0.1d
18±0.8b
K. pneumoniae ATCC 10031
18±0.2a
15±0.1c
16.6±0.3b
16±0.5b
c
12±0.5d
(b)
Minimum inhibitory concentrations(MIC) andMinimum bactericidal concentration(MBC) (mg/ml)
MIC
MBC
MIC
MBC
MIC
MBC
MIC
MBC
Gram
+
B. subtilis ATCC 6633
0.039
0.078
0.078
0.156
0.078
5.0
0.156
5.0
-
B. cereus ATCC 14579
0.039
0.625
0.156
5.0
0.156
0.156
0.312
5.0
-
S. aureus ATCC 25923
0.625
1.25
2.5
5.0
0.312
0.625
0.625
0.625
-
S. epidemis ATCC 12228
0.156
0.312
2.5
2.5
5.0
10
5.0
10
-
E. faecalis ATCC 29212
1.25
1.25
2.5
2.5
0.078
1.25
0.625
10
-
M. luteus ATCC 1880
0.312
1.25
2.5
5.0
5.0
10
5.0
10
-
L. monocytogenes  (food isolate 2132)
0.156
0.625
2.5
5.0
1.25
5.0
1.25
5.0
-
Gram
-
S. enteritidis (food isolate)
0.078
0.625
0.312
5.0
2.5
5.0
2.5
5.0
-
K. pneumoniae ATCC 10031
0.312
1.25
0.312
5.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
-
∗Genta: gentamicin was used as a standard antibiotic at a concentration of 15 μg/well; essential oil concentration: 15 μl/well; extract concentration: 2.5 mg/ml.
(-): not active (0 mm).
Values in the same line with different subscript (a > b > c>d) are significantly different within season (P <0.05).The results indicated thatBacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, and Enterococcus faecalis were the most sensitive microorganisms to the essential oils. They also exhibited the lowest MIC values varying between 0.078 and 0.156mg/ml, 0.156 and 0.312 mg/ml, 0.312 and 0.625 mg/ml, and 0.078 and 0.625mg/ml, respectively. As shown in Table 4, theM. longifolia harvest time affected significantly the inhibitory power of the essential oils (P < 0.05). It was found that the activity againstBacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis was highest in winter. The potent antibacterial activity ofM. longifolia essential oil sample from winter crops could be attributed to its richness in oxygenated monoterpenes (81.19%). It was reported that an essential oil containing monoterpenoid class compounds showed remarkable antimicrobial activities [51, 52].Pulegone, 1.8-cineole, and L-menthone were proven to have a potential antibacterial activity. Therefore, the winter essential oil efficiency may be especially related to its richness in such compounds. Pulegone was found to have an antibacterial activity through dissipating the pH gradient and altering the cell membrane potential [53]. Li et al. [54] reported that 1.8-cineole exhibits strong antibacterial properties that can be attributed to its ability to directly produce alterations on the structure ofE. coli,S. enteritidis andS. aureus. Simsek et al. [55] revealed that 1.8-cineole extracted fromEucalyptus essential oils could improve the antimicrobial effects of other antiseptics against some microorganisms such asS. aureus,E. coli, andE. faecalis. These composites may be able to inhibit synergistically or individually the growth of microorganisms and fight against bacterial infections.Our results also showed that essential oil samples exhibited high antibacterial activity against all Gram-positive bacteria tested. Among the Gram-negative ones,Salmonella enteritidis showed a lower sensitivity thanKlebsiella pneumonia(Table 4). Furthermore, this activity within these strains was not affected by seasonal variation. According to previous reports, Gram-negative bacteria appeared to be less effective in the action of various plant essential oils. This resistance against Gram-negative ones might be related to their highly complex outer membrane which protects them [56]. The Gram-positive bacteria cell membrane may facilitate penetration of the hydrophobic compounds [57]. However, the way the components of essential oil interact to inhibit bacterial growth could be a potential future perspective.This study showed that the harvest period influences the percentage of chemical constituents ofM. longifolia essential oil and that the observed essential oil antibacterial characteristics may be related to the oil chemical composition variation.Among the tested extracts, only Ml EtOAcF and Ml EtOH-H2OE exhibited an antibacterial activity. Ml HexF and Ml WF remained inactive in the range of the used concentration (2.5 mg/wells). Active extracts showed a potent antimicrobial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The inhibition zone diameters and MIC values were in the range of 17-27 mm and 0.039-1.25 mg/ml for the Ml EtOAcF and 12-20 mm and 0.078-2.5 mg/ml for the EtOH-H2OE. The Ml EtOAcF was the most active fraction with the lowest MBC values ranging from 0.0.78 to 1.25 mg/ml, respectively (Table 4).Based on these results, it is possible to conclude that Ml EtOAcF has a stronger and broad spectrum of antibacterial activity compared to the essential oil and EtOH-H2OE. The observed differences in the inhibition zones within pathogenic bacteria could probably be due to cell membrane permeability or other genetic factors.Furthermore, Ml EtOAcF and Ml EtOH-H2OE displayed a potent inhibition againstBacillussp., L. monocytogenes, andS. enteritidis with an MIC that ranged from 39 to 156 μg/ml. Infections caused by these bacteria, especially those with multidrugs resistance, are among the most difficult to treat with conventional antibiotics. In the current study, the growth ofB. subtilis was remarkably inhibited by the Ml EtOAcF (IZ = 27 mm; MIC = 0.039 mg/ml; and MBC = 0.078 mg/ml). The Ml EtOAcF remarkable antibacterial activity could be mainly due to its richness in composites that are well known by their antibacterial properties such as polyphenols and flavonoids found abundantly in this fraction [58]. Previous studies reported that these compounds are therefore able to minimize problems of drug resistance [59]. Earlier reports demonstrated that an interaction between signal transduction pathways and cell receptors and chemicals like polyphenols leads to the interruption of microorganisms growth and results in the cell death [60]. These results revealed that Ml EtOAcF can be used to manage bacterial resistance and protect foods against multiple pathogenic bacteria.According to its strong antibacterial and antioxidant activities, the Ml EtOAcF was chosen to be evaluated for its anti-inflammatory efficiency in rats’ models.


### 3.6. Acute Toxicity Study

The Ml EtOAcF up to the dose of 800 mg/kg BW did not produce any signs of adverse reactions and no changes on the behavior of the treated animals up to 14 days following the extract administration. The treated animals did not display any abnormal signs such as food and water intake, convulsions, salivation, or diarrhea. No deaths or weight losses were recorded during the study. Therefore, the Ml EtOAcF at 200 mg/Kg BW was used in thein vivo investigation of the anti-inflammatory activity.


### 3.7. Anti-Inflammatory Activity

In our study, subcutaneous administration of carrageenan induced an increase in paw size in rats due to oedema, thus revealing an acute paw inflammation. Figure1 shows the paw thickness in the different studied groups. The Ml EtOAcF and indomethacin significantly reduced carrageenan induced paw oedema in rats (P< 0.001) five hours after the induction of inflammation when compared to the control group.Figure 1
Effect of Ml EtOcF and indomethacin on paw oedema induced by carrageenan. Values represent mean ± SD (n = 6) in each group. ∗
P < 0.05, ∗
∗
P < 0.01, and ∗
∗
∗
P < 0.001. α: compared to control; β: compared to Carr; £: compared to Carr + Indo. Control: saline solution, Carr: carrageenan, Carr + Ml EtOcF: carrageenan+M. longifoliaethyl acetate fraction; Carr + Indo: carrageenan + indomethacin.Our findings revealed an inhibition of 62.29% of the paw oedema using the Ml EtOAcF compared to only 49.15% inhibition using the standard drug indomethacin after five hours (P < 0.01). The anti-inflammatory effect of 200 mg/kg BW of Ml EtOAcF was comparable to that of the standard drug indomethacin (Figure 1).The paw oedema tissues from all the groups were histologically examined (Figure2). The control group showed normal tissue whereas the carrageenan inflamed group displayed an intense oedema, characterized by conjunctive tissue with a substantial number of inflammatory cells infiltration. The carrageenan groups pretreated with indomethacin (10 mg/kg) or Ml EtOAcF (200mg/kg) exhibited a significant decrease in oedema as well as reduction in the inflammatory cells (Figure 2).Figure 2
Histopathological slides tissues of oedema paws in experimental groups of rats: (a) Saline group; (b) Carr group; (c) Carr + Ml EtOcF group (200 mg BW); (d) Carr + Indo group. Controls (a), rats treated with carrageenan (b), the combination of carrageenan and indomethacin (c), and treated rats with the combination of carrageenan and Ml EtOcF (d). Ep: epidermis; Der: dermis. Oedema ★. Inflammatory cell↗.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The development of oedema inflammation is a biphasic event: the first phase is caused by the release of histamine, leukotrienes, bradykinin, and cyclooxygenases in the first hour of the injection of carrageenan, and the second phase is linked to an increased generation of prostaglandins in the inflammatory tissue [61]. In the present study, Ml EtOAcF significantly improved the paw oedema induced by carrageenan after 5 hours. This result suggests that the Ml EtOAcF anti-inflammatory efficacy may be due to the inhibition of cyclooxygenase synthesis. Such an effect is similar to that produced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as indomethacin [62]. However, the exact mechanism of how Ml EtOAcF inhibits cyclooxygenase biosynthesis could be part of our future perspectives.


## 3.1. Seasonal Variation inM. longifolia Essential Oil

The oil yield-revealed data are shown in Table1. The largest amount of oil was found during the winter season corresponding to the flowering stage (2.5%) whereas theM. longifolia oil content decreased significantly (P < 0.05) in the spring season to reach 0.5%. The results revealed that essential oil accumulation inM. longifolia appears to be metabolically regulated during vegetative and flowering stages of crop growth. Such results were expected as the flowering stage is well known to be the most suitable for essential oil extraction compared to vegetative stage [25] and were in agreement with other research findings reporting a maximum essential oil yield during flowering stage [26]. It was also shown by Hussain et al. [27] that many testedMentha species revealed higher essential oil yield when the plants were in full bloom than when they reached the end of their growth cycle. The climatic factors variability such as temperature, total duration of exposure to sun, and precipitation could directly influence the oil yield during the two harvesting seasons [28, 29]. It was reported that the temperature influenced the oil yield ofO. basilicum with the highest yields in the winter season [30].Table 1
Yields extracts, amounts of total flavonoids, total phenolic compounds, and determined IC50 values of the DPPH free radical scavenging assay of M. longifolialeave extracts and essential oil. Ascorbic acid was used as positive control.
Extracts
Yield (
%
)
TPC
mg GAE/g
TF
mg QE/g
DPPH
IC
50
(
μ
g/ml)
β
carotene
IC
50
(
μ
g/ml)
Ml EtOH-H2OE
12.46
59.25±0.38
18.23±0.35
16.23 ± 1.60
66.75± 0.57
Ml HexF
7.35
nd
nd
> 1000
>1000
Ml EtAOcF
2.5
99.72±1.26
20.85 ± 0.94
12.64± 0.21
34.75 ± 0.76
Ml WF
2.61
45.25 ± 0.87
10.75 ± 0.47
47.71± 0.43
56.31± 0.67
EO
s-EO
w
0.5-2.5
-
-
> 100
> 100
Ascorbic acid
-
-
-
3.50
-
TPC: total phenolic content; TF: flavonoid content.
mg GAE /g: mg of gallic acid equivalent per g of dry plant extract.
mg QE/g: mg of quercetin equivalent per g of dry plant extract.
IC50 (μg/ml): the IC50 values corresponding to the amount of extract required to scavenge 50 % of radicals present in the reaction mixture.
nd: not detected.
EO
w: essential oil extracted at winter season; EO
s: spring essential oil.The mean percentage composition of total identified compounds of essential oils collected through the two seasons and used in bioassays are presented in Table2. A total of eighteen and sixteen compounds, accounting for 89.91 and 97.95 % of the total content, were identified in the essential oils obtained from winter and spring leaves, respectively. The oxygenated monoterpenes fraction dominated the two essential oils samples.Table 2
Seasonal variation in content and chemical composition of essential oils from leaves ofM. longifolia.
Component
A
Rt (min)
B
KI
C
%
Area
Spring
Winter
Monoterpene hydrocarbons
α-pinene
8.557
941
0.12±0.008b
0.93±0.02a
camphene
9.764
953
0.18±0.03b
0.41±0.008a
β-pinene
9.827
978
0.24±0.02b
1.22±0.05a
Oxygenated monoterpenes
1,8 cineole
11.492
1030
2.37±0.16b
21.3±0.24a
L-menthone
15.206
1152
4.68±0.2b
10.66±0.1a
Iso-menthone
15.429
1163
0.16±0.008b
8.69±0.12a
Borneol
15.503
1166
2.6±0.02a
1.87±0.04b
Menthol
15.801
1171
4.29±0.2a
0b
Cis-isopulegone
17.960
1175
0b
0.86±0.04a
Pulegone
18.349
1237
38.2±0.28a
26.92±0.53b
Piperitone
19.539
1251
0b
0.82±0.1a
Piperitenone
21.324
1340
1.18±0.12b
9.62±0.2a
cis-Jasmone
22.406
1400
0b
0.45±0.02a
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons
trans-Caryophyllene
22.949
1419
0.87±0.04b
2.7±0.1a
D-germacrene
24.046
1482
0.34±0.008a
0b
gamma.-Cadinene
25.106
1514
0b
0.52±0.08a
d-Cadinene
27.607
1523
0.4±0.006a
0b
delta.-Selinene
27.857
1578
0b
0.30±0a
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes
alpha.-Humulene
23.659
1454
0b
0.2±0a
alpha.-Cadinol
28.196
1654
0b
2.81±0.05a
Esters
Geranyl tiglate
29.260
1685
0b
0.24±0.008a
Fatty Acids
Palmitic acid
34.729
1927
15.26±0.2a
0b
Oleic acid
38.002
2128
23.79±0.5a
0b
Linoleic acid
38.317
2173
3.27±0.01a
0b
Total compound
97.95
89.91
ACompounds listed in order of elution from a HP-5 MS column.
BRetention time (as minutes).
CK.I. Kovats Index on HP-5MS column in reference to n-alkanes.
Values in the same line with different subscript (a > b) are significantly different within season (P< 0.05).The content of oxygenated monoterpenes in the essential oils was higher during the winter (81.19%) and lower during the spring (53.48%). Apart from the similarity in the major compound, the oils collected in winter and spring showed notably quantitative differences. In the winter crops, the prominent components were pulegone (26.92%), L-menthone (10.66 %), and 1,8 cineole (21.3 %). However, the major constituents in the spring oil were found to be pulegone (38.2 %) and fatty acids. This oil harbors also menthone (4.68%), menthol (4.29%), and 1,8 cineole (2.37%) but with less quantities. Fatty acids, not detectable in the winter oil, were represented mainly by oleic acid (23.79%) and palmitic acid (15.26%) and to a lesser extent by linoleic acid (3.27%) in the postflowering stage essential oil. Moreover, the testedM. longifolia essential oils contained significant amounts of several minor constituents, as seen in Table 2, including sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, oxygenated sesquiterpenes, and esters.The variation in the composition of theM. longifolia essential oils investigated in this study was quantitatively significant (P < 0.05). Most fluctuations in the essential oil components includes oxygenated monoterpenes, namely, pulegone (26.92-38.2%), 1, 8 cineole (2.37-21.3 %), L- Menthone (4.68-10.66 %), β pinene (0.24-1.22), α pinene (0.12-0.93 %), cis iso-pulegone (0-0.86 %), and piperitenone (1.18-9.62 %) from spring and winter, respectively. The yield of most of the compounds was higher in the flowering stage (winter), while pulegone was found to be high in the spring plant collection.Our findings are in line with those of Gazim et al. [31], who stated essential oil composition variation obtained fromTetradenia riparia (Lamiaceae) leaves at different seasons. The oxygenated monoterpenes and oxygenated sesquiterpenes contents were high during the winter and low during the spring-summer.The seasonal variations in content and chemical composition ofM. longifolia essential oil across countries have been attributed to environmental factors (climate/weather, soil/nutrition) that can influence the regulation of the essential oil biosynthesis [32]. Just like our results, previous investigations have demonstrated that the harvesting season can alter the chemical composition of the essential oils ofM. longifolia [30].Thus, based on these results and previous works we can conclude that the ingredients ofM. longifolia essential oil revealed a variation in its constituents depending on geographical and environmental factors and harvest time. Indeed, the adaptive metabolism of the plant influences the quality, the quantity and the chemical composition of the plant essential oil and could probably contribute to create a unique and specific chemical composition.Several previous reports from the literature show the qualitative and the quantitative analyses ofMentha longifolia essential oil from different countries [33–35].


## 3.2. Total Phenolics (TPC) and Flavonoids (TFC)

The quantitative estimation of TPC of theM. longifolia leave extracts (Table 1) showed that they are upper than their TFC amounts. The content of these secondary metabolites depends on the type of solvent used for the extraction with varying polarity.The Ml EtAOcF was found to contain the highest amount of phenolics (99.72 ± 1.26 mg GAE/g) compared to Ml EtOH-H2O extract (59.25 ± 0.38 mg GAE/g) and Ml WF (45.25 ± 0.87 mg GAE/g). The Ml EtAOcF also contained the highest flavonoid concentration (20.85 ± 0.94 mg QE/g), 2-fold more than Ml WF with 10.75 ± 0.47 (Table 1). The higher TPC and TFC values obtained with the ethyl acetate can be attributed to its good phenolic solubility and the high extraction capacity [36]. These metabolites showed differences in their concentrations in terms of solvents polarities and therefore their solubility which depends on their structures and polymerization degree [37].


## 3.3. Anticholinesterase Inhibition Assay

The acetylcholinesterase inhibitors are one of the most effective approaches to treat the cognitive symptoms of the Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Table3 shows the antiacetylcholinesterase capacity of essential oils and organic extracts ofM. longifolia, compared with those of galantamine used as a standard inhibitor.Table 3
Acetylcholinesterase inhibition capacity represented by IC50 (μg/ml) of essential oils and organics extracts of Mentha longifolia.
Extracts
Percentage of inhibition IC
50
(
μ
g/ml)
Ml HexF
934± 42.3c
Ml EtOH-H2OE
54.25 ± 1.10a
b
Ml EtOAc-F
12.3± 0.71a
Ml WF
85.68 ± 3.4b
EO
W
21.9± 1.14a
EO
S
49.3± 1.56a
b
Galanthamine∗
19.90 ± 1.48a
Averages ± SD were obtained from three different experiments.
∗Standard drug.
EOw: essential oil extracted at winter season; EOs: spring essential oil.
Values in the same line with different subscript (a > b > c) are significantly different within season (P <0.05).Based on IC50 values, all the extracts exhibited acetylcholinesterase inhibitory ability in the following order: Ml EtOAcF > Ml EtOH-H2OE > Ml WF > Ml HexF. The uppermost inhibitory activity was recorded with the Ml EtOAcF (IC50 = 12.30 μg/mL). Besides, it is clearly shown that AChE inhibitory activity ofM. longifolia essential oils varied significantly along their harvesting time. Table 3 shows that the essential oil extracted at the flowering stage (winter crops) exhibited the greatest inhibitory effect against AChE with an IC50 of 21.9μg/ml. Previous studies reported that theM. longifolia leaves essential oils have an acetylcholinesterase inhibitory capacity [38]. However, so far, and to the authors best knowledge, this is the first attempt that explores the seasonal variation of the AChE inhibitory capacity ofM. longifolia essential oils.Monoterpenes, reported inM. longifoliaessential oils, are known for their biological activities and beneficial effects [39]. Numerous essential oils and their isolated monoterpenes have been investigated for their effects on AChE. It was proven that purified 1.8-cineole, a monoterpene one of the major compounds of winterM. longifoliaessential oil, exhibited a potent inhibitory capacity on AChE activity and showed synergistic effect with other constituents [40]. It was reported by Mata et al. [21] that the essential oils of the twoMenthaspecies,M. pulegium andM. spicata, exhibited only moderate AChE inhibition with an IC50 of 324 and 357 μg/ml, respectively. The main components of these oils were pulegone and carvone. These compounds are reported as moderate inhibitors of AChE [41]. According to previous observed data, the AChE inhibition in our case byM. longifoliaessential oil (IC50 = 21.9 μg/ml) led to the suggestion that the activity is probably due to the synergistic effects of several components major and minor ones mainly monoterpenoids.On the other hand, the Ml EtOAcF was found to be more effective in the AChE inhibition than essential oils. Differently, Lopez et al. [42] reported an insignificant inhibition of organic extracts ofM. longifolia on this enzyme.Plants have been traditionally used to enhance cognitive functions and alleviate other symptoms nowadays associated with Alzheimer’s disease [43]. Most of the drugs used in Alzheimer therapy are formed by an enzyme inhibitor, e.g., galanthamine, isolated from the snowdrop extract [44]. There has been a lot of research on the biological effect of plants traditionally used as acetylcholinesterase inhibitorsin vitroand also as memory enhancersin vivo[45, 46]. The great inhibitory effect of Ml EtOAcF made us think that this fraction contains neuroprotective phytochemical molecules like phenolic active compounds which could be responsible for the plant potent anti-AChE activity. The AChE inhibition efficacy of Ml EtOAcF observed in this work comes probably from its richness in various effective chemical compounds present in the extract such as phenolic acids and flavonoids, proven to have an inhibitory ability against key enzymes involved in the cholinergic nervous system [47]. The bioactive compounds can act synergistically or individually to induce an AChE inhibitory activity. Further analyses have to be performed to delineate rationally the Ml EtOAcF active compound(s).


## 3.4. Evaluation of Antioxidant Activity: DPPH andβ Carotene Tests

The effect of the differentM. longifoliaorganic extracts and essential oils on DPPH radical scavenging capacity was evaluated by the determination of the IC50 values and then compared to the ascorbic acid used as positive control. Based on the IC50 values, the best activities were recorded with Ml EtOAcF (IC50= 12.64 μg/ml), followed by Ml EtOH-H2OE (IC50 = 16.23 μg/ml) and then by Ml WF (IC50 = 47.71± 0.43μg/ml). The Ml HexF showed a poor radical scavenging activity with an IC50 value more than 1000 μg/ml (Table 1). The Ml EtOAcF showed an interesting free-radical scavenging. Ascorbic acid showed a potent antioxidant activity with an IC50 value of 3.5 μg/ml (Table 1).Both samples ofM. longifoliaessential oil showed a weak DPPH radical scavenging activity with an IC50 value more than 100 μg/ml when compared to the organic extracts. Our results are in accordance with the findings of Gulluce et al. [48] who reported thatM. longifoliamethanol extract (obtained at the flowering stage) was more effective in scavenging DPPH free radical than the essential oil. The antiradical efficiency due to a hydrogen atom transferring reaction showed a positive correlation with phenolics content (R2 = 0.987) and therefore their implication inM. longifoliaantiradical activity.A wide variation in the antioxidant activity ofM. longifoliawas observed in the literature. Mkaddem et al. [49] showed a moderate IC50 value of essential oil (> 8000 mg/ml) assayed by DPPH. It was also found that the IC50 value of the methanol extract of TurkishM. longifolia was in the range of 57.4 μg/ ml [48]. In addition, a lower IC50 of methanol extract in the range of 20 μg/ml was obtained by Hajlaoui et al. [50].AllM. longifoliaorganic extracts inhibited the β-carotene oxidation except for essential oils. The Ml EtOAcF exhibited a strong activity with IC50 values of 34.75 μg/ml compared to those of the essential oils (IC50 > 100 μg/ml). The inhibition of lipid peroxidation by addition ofM. longifoliaorganic extracts could be used to improve the quality and stability of food products. These extracts are able to quenching peroxide radicals and to terminate the peroxidation chain reaction.These results suggest thatM. longifolia leaves are promising sources of various bioactive compounds for human health. The results obtained for antioxidant properties in this work are in agreement with earlier results of other authors [34, 48].


## 3.5. Antibacterial Activity

The inhibitory spectra of the essential oils seasonally extracted fromM. longifolia and its organic extracts were evaluated against nine pathogenic bacteria by the presence or absence of inhibition zones followed by MIC and MBC values measurement (Table 4).Table 4
Season variation in antibacterial activity ofM. longifoliaessential oils against the bacterial strains tested. EO
w: essential oil extracted at winter season; EO
s: spring essential oil.
(a)
Bacterial strains
Extracts
Ml EtOcF
Ml EtOH-H
2
OE
E
O
W
E
O
S
Genta
∗
Diameter of inhibition zone (mm)
Gram
+
B. subtilis ATCC 6633
27±0.1a
14±0.2c
26.3±0.0a
11±0.5d
20±0.2b
B. cereus ATCC 14579
17±0.3c
12±0.8e
26±0.2a
14±0.6d
20±0.4b
S. aureus ATCC 25923
25±0.0a
13±0.6b
24.9±0.3a
14.6±0.5b
25±0.8a
S. epidemis ATCC 12228
24±0.6a
20±0.3b
14±0.4c
13±0.0c
20±0.5b
E. faecalis ATCC 29212
18±0.1b
0d
20±0.3a
12±0.1c
12±0.2c
M. luteus ATCC 1880
21±0.4a
18±0.5b
15±0.6c
15±0.6c
20±0.7a
L. monocytogenes (food isolate 2132)
19±0.2a
18±0.1a
13.16 ±0.4c
12.60 ±0.9c
15±0.0b
Gram
-
S. enteritidis  (food isolate)
24±0.2a
14±0.3c
10±0.12d
11.3±0.1d
18±0.8b
K. pneumoniae ATCC 10031
18±0.2a
15±0.1c
16.6±0.3b
16±0.5b
c
12±0.5d
(b)
Minimum inhibitory concentrations(MIC) andMinimum bactericidal concentration(MBC) (mg/ml)
MIC
MBC
MIC
MBC
MIC
MBC
MIC
MBC
Gram
+
B. subtilis ATCC 6633
0.039
0.078
0.078
0.156
0.078
5.0
0.156
5.0
-
B. cereus ATCC 14579
0.039
0.625
0.156
5.0
0.156
0.156
0.312
5.0
-
S. aureus ATCC 25923
0.625
1.25
2.5
5.0
0.312
0.625
0.625
0.625
-
S. epidemis ATCC 12228
0.156
0.312
2.5
2.5
5.0
10
5.0
10
-
E. faecalis ATCC 29212
1.25
1.25
2.5
2.5
0.078
1.25
0.625
10
-
M. luteus ATCC 1880
0.312
1.25
2.5
5.0
5.0
10
5.0
10
-
L. monocytogenes  (food isolate 2132)
0.156
0.625
2.5
5.0
1.25
5.0
1.25
5.0
-
Gram
-
S. enteritidis (food isolate)
0.078
0.625
0.312
5.0
2.5
5.0
2.5
5.0
-
K. pneumoniae ATCC 10031
0.312
1.25
0.312
5.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
-
∗Genta: gentamicin was used as a standard antibiotic at a concentration of 15 μg/well; essential oil concentration: 15 μl/well; extract concentration: 2.5 mg/ml.
(-): not active (0 mm).
Values in the same line with different subscript (a > b > c>d) are significantly different within season (P <0.05).The results indicated thatBacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, and Enterococcus faecalis were the most sensitive microorganisms to the essential oils. They also exhibited the lowest MIC values varying between 0.078 and 0.156mg/ml, 0.156 and 0.312 mg/ml, 0.312 and 0.625 mg/ml, and 0.078 and 0.625mg/ml, respectively. As shown in Table 4, theM. longifolia harvest time affected significantly the inhibitory power of the essential oils (P < 0.05). It was found that the activity againstBacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis was highest in winter. The potent antibacterial activity ofM. longifolia essential oil sample from winter crops could be attributed to its richness in oxygenated monoterpenes (81.19%). It was reported that an essential oil containing monoterpenoid class compounds showed remarkable antimicrobial activities [51, 52].Pulegone, 1.8-cineole, and L-menthone were proven to have a potential antibacterial activity. Therefore, the winter essential oil efficiency may be especially related to its richness in such compounds. Pulegone was found to have an antibacterial activity through dissipating the pH gradient and altering the cell membrane potential [53]. Li et al. [54] reported that 1.8-cineole exhibits strong antibacterial properties that can be attributed to its ability to directly produce alterations on the structure ofE. coli,S. enteritidis andS. aureus. Simsek et al. [55] revealed that 1.8-cineole extracted fromEucalyptus essential oils could improve the antimicrobial effects of other antiseptics against some microorganisms such asS. aureus,E. coli, andE. faecalis. These composites may be able to inhibit synergistically or individually the growth of microorganisms and fight against bacterial infections.Our results also showed that essential oil samples exhibited high antibacterial activity against all Gram-positive bacteria tested. Among the Gram-negative ones,Salmonella enteritidis showed a lower sensitivity thanKlebsiella pneumonia(Table 4). Furthermore, this activity within these strains was not affected by seasonal variation. According to previous reports, Gram-negative bacteria appeared to be less effective in the action of various plant essential oils. This resistance against Gram-negative ones might be related to their highly complex outer membrane which protects them [56]. The Gram-positive bacteria cell membrane may facilitate penetration of the hydrophobic compounds [57]. However, the way the components of essential oil interact to inhibit bacterial growth could be a potential future perspective.This study showed that the harvest period influences the percentage of chemical constituents ofM. longifolia essential oil and that the observed essential oil antibacterial characteristics may be related to the oil chemical composition variation.Among the tested extracts, only Ml EtOAcF and Ml EtOH-H2OE exhibited an antibacterial activity. Ml HexF and Ml WF remained inactive in the range of the used concentration (2.5 mg/wells). Active extracts showed a potent antimicrobial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The inhibition zone diameters and MIC values were in the range of 17-27 mm and 0.039-1.25 mg/ml for the Ml EtOAcF and 12-20 mm and 0.078-2.5 mg/ml for the EtOH-H2OE. The Ml EtOAcF was the most active fraction with the lowest MBC values ranging from 0.0.78 to 1.25 mg/ml, respectively (Table 4).Based on these results, it is possible to conclude that Ml EtOAcF has a stronger and broad spectrum of antibacterial activity compared to the essential oil and EtOH-H2OE. The observed differences in the inhibition zones within pathogenic bacteria could probably be due to cell membrane permeability or other genetic factors.Furthermore, Ml EtOAcF and Ml EtOH-H2OE displayed a potent inhibition againstBacillussp., L. monocytogenes, andS. enteritidis with an MIC that ranged from 39 to 156 μg/ml. Infections caused by these bacteria, especially those with multidrugs resistance, are among the most difficult to treat with conventional antibiotics. In the current study, the growth ofB. subtilis was remarkably inhibited by the Ml EtOAcF (IZ = 27 mm; MIC = 0.039 mg/ml; and MBC = 0.078 mg/ml). The Ml EtOAcF remarkable antibacterial activity could be mainly due to its richness in composites that are well known by their antibacterial properties such as polyphenols and flavonoids found abundantly in this fraction [58]. Previous studies reported that these compounds are therefore able to minimize problems of drug resistance [59]. Earlier reports demonstrated that an interaction between signal transduction pathways and cell receptors and chemicals like polyphenols leads to the interruption of microorganisms growth and results in the cell death [60]. These results revealed that Ml EtOAcF can be used to manage bacterial resistance and protect foods against multiple pathogenic bacteria.According to its strong antibacterial and antioxidant activities, the Ml EtOAcF was chosen to be evaluated for its anti-inflammatory efficiency in rats’ models.


## 3.6. Acute Toxicity Study

The Ml EtOAcF up to the dose of 800 mg/kg BW did not produce any signs of adverse reactions and no changes on the behavior of the treated animals up to 14 days following the extract administration. The treated animals did not display any abnormal signs such as food and water intake, convulsions, salivation, or diarrhea. No deaths or weight losses were recorded during the study. Therefore, the Ml EtOAcF at 200 mg/Kg BW was used in thein vivo investigation of the anti-inflammatory activity.


## 3.7. Anti-Inflammatory Activity

In our study, subcutaneous administration of carrageenan induced an increase in paw size in rats due to oedema, thus revealing an acute paw inflammation. Figure1 shows the paw thickness in the different studied groups. The Ml EtOAcF and indomethacin significantly reduced carrageenan induced paw oedema in rats (P< 0.001) five hours after the induction of inflammation when compared to the control group.Figure 1
Effect of Ml EtOcF and indomethacin on paw oedema induced by carrageenan. Values represent mean ± SD (n = 6) in each group. ∗
P < 0.05, ∗
∗
P < 0.01, and ∗
∗
∗
P < 0.001. α: compared to control; β: compared to Carr; £: compared to Carr + Indo. Control: saline solution, Carr: carrageenan, Carr + Ml EtOcF: carrageenan+M. longifoliaethyl acetate fraction; Carr + Indo: carrageenan + indomethacin.Our findings revealed an inhibition of 62.29% of the paw oedema using the Ml EtOAcF compared to only 49.15% inhibition using the standard drug indomethacin after five hours (P < 0.01). The anti-inflammatory effect of 200 mg/kg BW of Ml EtOAcF was comparable to that of the standard drug indomethacin (Figure 1).The paw oedema tissues from all the groups were histologically examined (Figure2). The control group showed normal tissue whereas the carrageenan inflamed group displayed an intense oedema, characterized by conjunctive tissue with a substantial number of inflammatory cells infiltration. The carrageenan groups pretreated with indomethacin (10 mg/kg) or Ml EtOAcF (200mg/kg) exhibited a significant decrease in oedema as well as reduction in the inflammatory cells (Figure 2).Figure 2
Histopathological slides tissues of oedema paws in experimental groups of rats: (a) Saline group; (b) Carr group; (c) Carr + Ml EtOcF group (200 mg BW); (d) Carr + Indo group. Controls (a), rats treated with carrageenan (b), the combination of carrageenan and indomethacin (c), and treated rats with the combination of carrageenan and Ml EtOcF (d). Ep: epidermis; Der: dermis. Oedema ★. Inflammatory cell↗.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The development of oedema inflammation is a biphasic event: the first phase is caused by the release of histamine, leukotrienes, bradykinin, and cyclooxygenases in the first hour of the injection of carrageenan, and the second phase is linked to an increased generation of prostaglandins in the inflammatory tissue [61]. In the present study, Ml EtOAcF significantly improved the paw oedema induced by carrageenan after 5 hours. This result suggests that the Ml EtOAcF anti-inflammatory efficacy may be due to the inhibition of cyclooxygenase synthesis. Such an effect is similar to that produced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as indomethacin [62]. However, the exact mechanism of how Ml EtOAcF inhibits cyclooxygenase biosynthesis could be part of our future perspectives.


## 4. Conclusion

The study highlighted the effect of the harvesting time on the essential oils composition and biological activities ofM. longifolia. The essential oils extracted from the fresh leaves were characterized by their richness in oxygenated monoterpenes. Significant variations of the essential oils composition were shown depending on the harvesting time.M. longifolia essential oils have a remarkable antibacterial activity and an effective inhibitory effect against the enzyme related to Alzheimer’s (AChE). However, the levels of these biological activities vary according to the harvest time. In fact, the interesting antibacterial and AChE inhibitory activities were observed in the winter crops, corresponding to the flowering stage. These results may be useful in choosing the optimal collection time for the production of the plant active agents with high medicinal value. The present study also revealed that the Ml EtOAcF obtained from winter leaves has a significant anti-inflammatory capacity and the uppermost anticholinesterase activity. The richness of the extract in various chemicals such as phenolic compounds could clearly contribute to its medicinal properties. Further studies are still recommended to accurately identify the bioactive molecules in this extract for the exploitation of this plant in various pharmaceutical fields and the promotion of the desired biological activities.



---

*Source: 7856517-2018-12-09.xml*