# Analysis of the Hybrid of Mudar/Snake Grass Fiber-Reinforced Epoxy with Nano-Silica Filler Composite for Structural Application

Authors: I. Jenish; A. Felix Sahayaraj; V. Suresh; J. Mani raj; M. Appadurai; E. Fantin Irudaya Raj; Omaima Nasif; Saleh Alfarraj; Ashok Kumar Kumaravel
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

Natural fiber composite materials are competent materials that may replace conventional synthetic materials where the strength to weight ratio is essential. In this paper, the mechanical characteristics of composites made up of randomly oriented natural fibers (mudar fiber and snake grass fiber) with nano-silica filler are detailed for the first time. From the various literature surveys, the critical length of mudar and snake grass fiber is chosen as 40 mm and 30 mm, respectively. The test samples were prepared with a fiber content of 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% with an equal amount of mudar and snake grass fiber. The percentage of nano-filler is maintained as constant as 3% with all the compositions. The composites showed that the highest mechanical properties were found at 30% fiber volume. The maximum tensile strength is 45 MPa, and the flexural strength is 51 MPa. The maximum impact strength is 4.5 J. Sample ID 3 provided the best results compared to other proportions. The fiber/matrix adhesion was investigated using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). These predominant mechanical properties make it easier for the implementation of the prepared composite material in structural and automotive applications.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The mechanical properties of the natural fiber polymer composites depend on several factors, such as single fiber strength, average fiber length, and fiber-matrix adhesion. Strong interfacial bonding is necessary for optimal stress transmission between fiber and matrix [1–3]. The resistance to moisture-induced deterioration of the matrix-fiber adhesion was improved by surface treatment of fiber [4]. The mechanical properties of natural fiber-reinforced polymer composites are significantly influenced by certain manufacturing processes [5]. Natural fibers, particularly jute, hemp, flax, and kenaf, have excellent mechanical characteristics and may be able to compete with glass fiber in terms of specific strength and modulus [6]. Several kinds of research were done on the variety of natural fibers, including jute, hemp, sisal, and kenaf, to see how they affect the mechanical characteristics of composite materials [7]. Bast fibers are derived from the outer cell layers of diverse plant stems and account for one-third of the total weight. Bast fibers are a collection of fiber bundles. To improve finer fiber extraction, these bundles are physically or chemically broken down. The filaments are comprised of cellulose and hemicellulose and are held together by a lignin or pectin matrix. Purely natural bast fibers come from the vascular tissue or outer bark of jute, kenaf, flax, and hemp plants and are strong cellulosic fibers [8]. The flax fibers were extracted from the bast or skin of the plant. Flax fibers are smooth, less dense, and flexible, and bundles of fiber resemble blonde hair, thus the term “flaxen” [9–12]. The banana fiber composite is ductile, requiring little plastic deformation [13]. Pandanus plant fiber is easily accessible and has higher fiber content [14]. Incorporation of nano-silica increased the mechanical properties without increasing the density of the composite materials [15]. The stiffness of the matrix is increased by adding nano-silica which leads to transferring the load easily from matrix to fiber, so automatically, the properties of the composite material are improved [16]. The tensile (tensile strength/modulus) and flexural (tensile strength/modulus) properties are increased by adding 3 wt.% of nano-silica with epoxy hybrid composite [17]. Natural fiber characteristics are determined by their chemical components [18], which are determined by the geological conditions in which they were found. The amount of cellulose in natural fiber determines its strength [19]. Characteristics like fiber selection and the matrix used during processing influence the characteristics of natural fiber-reinforced composites [20]. The bonding between the fiber and the matrix determines the strength of the processed natural fiber composite, which is affected by surface shape [21]. Kevlar and Napier grass fibers are bonded with epoxy matrix to create a novel composite utilizing a traditional hand layup fabrication method, and five different sequences are fabricated to measure the mechanical properties of this hybrid composite laminate [22]. Thus, natural fibers are regarded as the suitable reinforcement in material industries for better development. In this article, hybrid of mudar/snake grass fiber-reinforced epoxy composite particulate-filled with silica nano-powder has been fabricated, and the mechanical properties of the fabricated samples are discussed. As it has a substantial load carrying capacity, obligating a preferable structural application would give the value of this material.


## 2. Materials and Methods

The raw materials used in the fabrication of hybrid composites are mudar fiber (Calotropis gigantea), snake grass (Sansevieria ehrenbergii), nano-silica, epoxy resin (LY 556), and hardener (HY 951). The epoxy resin has the density of 1.11 g/cm3 and Young’s modulus of 3400 MPa. Moreover, it has the failure stress and strain value of 95 MPa and 3%. The composite fabrication process is shown in Figure 1. The properties of the fibers are given in Table 1.Figure 1
Composite fabrication process.Table 1
Properties of the fibers.
Fiber nameDensity (g/cm3)Diameter (μm)Gage length (mm)Tensile strength (MPa)Tensile modulus (GPa)Elongation (%)Calotropis gigantea [23]0.56125503829.72.1Sansevieria ehrenbergii [24]0.88720–25010–5050–5851.5–7.672.8–21.7


### 2.1. Mudar Fiber

The fibers were collected from the Kanyakumari region, Tamil Nadu, India. The fine, robust fibers that predominate throughout the plant make it useful. The scientific name of the plant isCalotropis gigantea. To get them, the straightest branches are cut and left to wither for at least twenty four hours; the skin is then peeled and the stringy part between the bark and the inner layer is removed on the second and third days. They are then exposed to the sun to dry. This method is time-consuming and costly, but soaking the bark in water causes it to decompose the layers, and cutting it will ruin it. The fiber may be separated as finest fiber for the useful work. It can withstand water for a long period. Then, it is dried at 70°C in an oven. The plant is illustrated in Figure 2, and extracted fiber is shown in Figure 3.Figure 2
Calotropis gigantea.Figure 3
Extracted mudar fiber.


### 2.2. Snake Grass Fiber

Snake grass fibers were extracted from leaves of theSansevieria ehrenbergii plant from local parts of Kannampalayam village, Coimbatore, India. Snake grass has several physical characteristics that make it more ideal for spinning finer counts, including length, strength, and uniformity. The fiber has been extracted through the microbial degradation technique. Figures 4 and 5 show the plants and fiber images.Figure 4
Sansevieria ehrenbergii.Figure 5
Extracted snake grass fiber.


### 2.3. Nano-Silica

The nano-silica is not very expensive and easily available in most of the shops and also easy to transport. But, it must be neatly packed during transport because the size is in nano-scale. The nano-silica was bought from Astrra Chemicals, Chennai. The size of the powder is 15–80 nm. The colour is pure white. Special care was taken during material preparation time because it easily spreads over the air. The normal and SEM images of the nano-silica are given in Figures6(a) and 6(b).Figure 6
(a) Image of nano-silica. (b) SEM image of nano-silica.
(a)(b)


### 2.4. Epoxy Resin

Epoxy (LY 556) was obtained from Covai Seenu Chemicals, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. The epoxy resin is coupled with catalyzing ingredients to form polyepoxide which is in the form of polymers and cross-links. The viscosity of the mixture and its shrinking properties are influenced by epoxy resin and additives. The number of fillers and diluents used will affect the resin system’s physical and handling qualities.


### 2.5. Hardener

The hardener (HY 951) is being utilized was supplied by Covai Seenu Chemicals, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. These hardeners react with the epoxy resins and have a significant impact on the ultimate properties of the cured epoxy resin system. Epoxy with hardener blending provides significant properties of gel time, combined viscosity, and demold time. Epoxy hardeners have an impact on the physical characteristics of epoxy resin systems, such as tensile, compression, and flexural qualities.


### 2.6. Mold Design for Specimen Preparation

The composite plates with mudar and snake grass hybrid fibers as reinforcement were prepared with the dimension of 300 mm × 150 mm × 3 mm, as shown in Figure7. Steel plates were used to create the mold. For non-sticking purposes, Teflon sheets were placed at the top and bottom. A spacer frame was employed to lay the fiber on the mold. The different combinations of fabricated samples are shown in Table 2.Figure 7
Steel die mold.Table 2
Composition of fabricated samples.
Sample IDCompositionEpoxy (%)Fiber (MF + SGF) (%)Nano-silica (%)Sample 187103Sample 277203Sample 367303Sample 457403


## 2.1. Mudar Fiber

The fibers were collected from the Kanyakumari region, Tamil Nadu, India. The fine, robust fibers that predominate throughout the plant make it useful. The scientific name of the plant isCalotropis gigantea. To get them, the straightest branches are cut and left to wither for at least twenty four hours; the skin is then peeled and the stringy part between the bark and the inner layer is removed on the second and third days. They are then exposed to the sun to dry. This method is time-consuming and costly, but soaking the bark in water causes it to decompose the layers, and cutting it will ruin it. The fiber may be separated as finest fiber for the useful work. It can withstand water for a long period. Then, it is dried at 70°C in an oven. The plant is illustrated in Figure 2, and extracted fiber is shown in Figure 3.Figure 2
Calotropis gigantea.Figure 3
Extracted mudar fiber.


## 2.2. Snake Grass Fiber

Snake grass fibers were extracted from leaves of theSansevieria ehrenbergii plant from local parts of Kannampalayam village, Coimbatore, India. Snake grass has several physical characteristics that make it more ideal for spinning finer counts, including length, strength, and uniformity. The fiber has been extracted through the microbial degradation technique. Figures 4 and 5 show the plants and fiber images.Figure 4
Sansevieria ehrenbergii.Figure 5
Extracted snake grass fiber.


## 2.3. Nano-Silica

The nano-silica is not very expensive and easily available in most of the shops and also easy to transport. But, it must be neatly packed during transport because the size is in nano-scale. The nano-silica was bought from Astrra Chemicals, Chennai. The size of the powder is 15–80 nm. The colour is pure white. Special care was taken during material preparation time because it easily spreads over the air. The normal and SEM images of the nano-silica are given in Figures6(a) and 6(b).Figure 6
(a) Image of nano-silica. (b) SEM image of nano-silica.
(a)(b)


## 2.4. Epoxy Resin

Epoxy (LY 556) was obtained from Covai Seenu Chemicals, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. The epoxy resin is coupled with catalyzing ingredients to form polyepoxide which is in the form of polymers and cross-links. The viscosity of the mixture and its shrinking properties are influenced by epoxy resin and additives. The number of fillers and diluents used will affect the resin system’s physical and handling qualities.


## 2.5. Hardener

The hardener (HY 951) is being utilized was supplied by Covai Seenu Chemicals, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. These hardeners react with the epoxy resins and have a significant impact on the ultimate properties of the cured epoxy resin system. Epoxy with hardener blending provides significant properties of gel time, combined viscosity, and demold time. Epoxy hardeners have an impact on the physical characteristics of epoxy resin systems, such as tensile, compression, and flexural qualities.


## 2.6. Mold Design for Specimen Preparation

The composite plates with mudar and snake grass hybrid fibers as reinforcement were prepared with the dimension of 300 mm × 150 mm × 3 mm, as shown in Figure7. Steel plates were used to create the mold. For non-sticking purposes, Teflon sheets were placed at the top and bottom. A spacer frame was employed to lay the fiber on the mold. The different combinations of fabricated samples are shown in Table 2.Figure 7
Steel die mold.Table 2
Composition of fabricated samples.
Sample IDCompositionEpoxy (%)Fiber (MF + SGF) (%)Nano-silica (%)Sample 187103Sample 277203Sample 367303Sample 457403


## 3. Experimental Procedure

### 3.1. Chopped Fiber-Reinforced Nano-Silica Composite Material Preparation

The samples were fabricated with 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% volume fractions of fibers with 3% of nano-silica. The compression molding technique was employed to fabricate the samples. The fibers were cut into 5 mm to 8 mm lengths. Extracted fibers were kept in the oven at 70°C for 6 hours to remove the moisture content. The matrix solution was formed by mixing the epoxy and hardener in the ratio of 10 : 1. 3% of nano-silica was mixed with matrix and hardener for better propagation. The mixer was poured into the fiber and then the mold was closed. Pressure was applied to the mold to get the sample compacted. The remaining mixture was applied to the unfinished parts. Meanwhile, the composite plate was squeezed and compacted with a hand to remove the bubbles from the plate. The composite plate was left to cure for 20–24 hours until it was completely dry. A determined quantity of epoxy resin and hardener was employed for varying volume fractions of fibers.


### 3.2. Specimen for Testing

The mechanical properties were analyzed after preparing the samples. The composite boards were cut into the standard test specimens (5 specimens were prepared for each testing to get an average value). Handsaws and other tools were used in the cutting process. All specimens tested were conditioned according to ASTM standards. The test specimens were kept in a room with a temperature of 23°C ± 2°C with 50% of relative humidity for 40 hours before starting the test. All of the tests were carried out in a typical laboratory environment with a temperature of 23°C and relative humidity of 50%.


### 3.3. Mechanical Testing

Following manufacture, the test specimens were put through a series of ASTM-required mechanical testing. Tensile, impact, and flexural test specimens with ASTM standard and dimensions are listed in Table3.Table 3
Test specimen standards with dimension.
S. NoType of testingStandard usedSpecimen dimension1Tensile testingASTM D3039250 mm × 25 mm ×  2.5 mm2Flexural testingASTM D790154 mm × 13 mm ×  3 mm3Impact testing (Izod)ASTM D481264 mm × 12.7 mm ×  3.2 mm


### 3.4. Tensile Test (ASTM D3039)

Once the curing process was done on the developed composite, a wire cutting instrument was employed to make the specimens into the required dimensions. The tensile test specimen was made as per ASTM D3039 (Figure8); the testing specimen has a length of 250 mm and width of 25 mm. The item was held in the grips of an Instron universal tester with a gage length of 100 millimeters. The ultimate tensile strength and tensile modulus of the composite were determined from the stress-strain diagram.Figure 8
Specimen for tensile test.


### 3.5. Flexural Test (ASTM D790)

After the fiber-reinforced composite was cured, the specimens were cut into the required dimension with the aid of a wire cutting machine. The flexural test specimen was made following ASTM D790 (Figure9); the composite was cut into the required dimension of 154 mm in length and 13 mm in width. The specimen was fixed tightly with the Instron testing machine for measurement. The ultimate flexural strength of the specimens was measured from the stress-strain graph.Figure 9
Specimen for flexural test.


### 3.6. Impact Test (ASTM D4812)

This test was done to measure the impact resistance of the developed composite. The amount of energy required to initiate the crack and keep it up to fracture is called impact. This test may be used to assess whether a material fulfills specified impact qualities or to compare materials for overall toughness. The specimens were prepared according to ASTM D4812 standard. The test sample is shown in Figure10.Figure 10
Specimen for impact test.


## 3.1. Chopped Fiber-Reinforced Nano-Silica Composite Material Preparation

The samples were fabricated with 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% volume fractions of fibers with 3% of nano-silica. The compression molding technique was employed to fabricate the samples. The fibers were cut into 5 mm to 8 mm lengths. Extracted fibers were kept in the oven at 70°C for 6 hours to remove the moisture content. The matrix solution was formed by mixing the epoxy and hardener in the ratio of 10 : 1. 3% of nano-silica was mixed with matrix and hardener for better propagation. The mixer was poured into the fiber and then the mold was closed. Pressure was applied to the mold to get the sample compacted. The remaining mixture was applied to the unfinished parts. Meanwhile, the composite plate was squeezed and compacted with a hand to remove the bubbles from the plate. The composite plate was left to cure for 20–24 hours until it was completely dry. A determined quantity of epoxy resin and hardener was employed for varying volume fractions of fibers.


## 3.2. Specimen for Testing

The mechanical properties were analyzed after preparing the samples. The composite boards were cut into the standard test specimens (5 specimens were prepared for each testing to get an average value). Handsaws and other tools were used in the cutting process. All specimens tested were conditioned according to ASTM standards. The test specimens were kept in a room with a temperature of 23°C ± 2°C with 50% of relative humidity for 40 hours before starting the test. All of the tests were carried out in a typical laboratory environment with a temperature of 23°C and relative humidity of 50%.


## 3.3. Mechanical Testing

Following manufacture, the test specimens were put through a series of ASTM-required mechanical testing. Tensile, impact, and flexural test specimens with ASTM standard and dimensions are listed in Table3.Table 3
Test specimen standards with dimension.
S. NoType of testingStandard usedSpecimen dimension1Tensile testingASTM D3039250 mm × 25 mm ×  2.5 mm2Flexural testingASTM D790154 mm × 13 mm ×  3 mm3Impact testing (Izod)ASTM D481264 mm × 12.7 mm ×  3.2 mm


## 3.4. Tensile Test (ASTM D3039)

Once the curing process was done on the developed composite, a wire cutting instrument was employed to make the specimens into the required dimensions. The tensile test specimen was made as per ASTM D3039 (Figure8); the testing specimen has a length of 250 mm and width of 25 mm. The item was held in the grips of an Instron universal tester with a gage length of 100 millimeters. The ultimate tensile strength and tensile modulus of the composite were determined from the stress-strain diagram.Figure 8
Specimen for tensile test.


## 3.5. Flexural Test (ASTM D790)

After the fiber-reinforced composite was cured, the specimens were cut into the required dimension with the aid of a wire cutting machine. The flexural test specimen was made following ASTM D790 (Figure9); the composite was cut into the required dimension of 154 mm in length and 13 mm in width. The specimen was fixed tightly with the Instron testing machine for measurement. The ultimate flexural strength of the specimens was measured from the stress-strain graph.Figure 9
Specimen for flexural test.


## 3.6. Impact Test (ASTM D4812)

This test was done to measure the impact resistance of the developed composite. The amount of energy required to initiate the crack and keep it up to fracture is called impact. This test may be used to assess whether a material fulfills specified impact qualities or to compare materials for overall toughness. The specimens were prepared according to ASTM D4812 standard. The test sample is shown in Figure10.Figure 10
Specimen for impact test.


## 4. Results and Discussion

Previous sections covered the preparation of these composites as well as the tests that were undertaken on them. Here are the findings of several characterization tests. Tensile strength, flexural strength, and impact strength have all been investigated and analyzed.


### 4.1. Tensile Test

Table4 shows the tensile properties of epoxy/SGF/MF with nano-silica hybrid composite. From the table, it was clear that sample 3 (67% epoxy with 30% fiber volume fraction with 3% nano-silica) produces maximum tensile properties (45 N/mm2) compared with other volume fractions. Hence, fiber volume fractions and nano-silica influenced the tensile strength of the developed composite. It was observed that the addition of fiber with the epoxy matrix improves the mechanical properties to the certain level. Fiber percentage more than 30% decreases the matrix-fiber adhesion, leading to the decrease in mechanical properties. Also, increased fiber content beyond 30% will increase the void percentage in the developed composite materials.Table 4
Tensile test result.
Sample IDBreaking load (N)Ultimate stress (N/mm2)Max. displacement (mm)Sample 11315283.5Sample 21610363.7Sample 32760453.4Sample 41448383.2


### 4.2. Flexural Test

Flexural strength also called as bending strength can be measured using a 3-point flexural testing procedure. Flexural strength of the developed composites is listed in Table5. The samples start to crack when the load exceeds the strength of developed samples. The flexural strength (51 N/mm2) of sample 3 is more compared to the remaining developed samples. The presence of mudar fiber, snake grass fiber, and nano-silica increases the flexural strength. The higher flexural strength enhances the load-bearing capacity of samples. Flexural strength variation is very similar to tensile strength results. Adhesion between matrix and fiber reduces when the fiber percentage is more than 30%. It does not allow a significant improvement for further addition of fiber in the sample.Table 5
Flexural test result.
Sample IDBreaking load (N)Ultimate stress (N/mm2)Max. displacement (mm)Sample 11983110.5Sample 21823511.5Sample 3455517.1Sample 4204393.2


### 4.3. Impact Test

The impact test determines the material’s capacity to sustain abrupt shock loads. This test is carried out using an XJJU-50 impact testing machine. The mechanism comprises a loaded striker with set kinetic energy when released. The load will be removed once the specimen manufactured according to the specifications is retained in the machine. The amount of energy absorbed would be shown on display.The impact strength of developed samples is listed in Table6. From Table 6, sample 3 (67% resin +30% fiber + 3% nano-silica) produces the highest impact strength compared to other developed composites. Hence, sample 3 could be the suitable material for high damping and vibration-related applications.Table 6
Impact test results.
Sample IDImpact strength (J)Sample 12.94Sample 23.33Sample 34.50Sample 42.80


### 4.4. SEM Investigation

The surface characteristics of developed samples were analyzed by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Samples were prepared with gold sputter coating for conducting purposes. A fractured tensile sample is shown in Figure9. Sample 3 produces better mechanical properties that show proper bonding between matrix and fiber, resulting in improved tensile, flexural, and impact properties. The crack content and void content are less compared with other samples. Nano-silica increased the flexibility of the matrix, which led to the movement of the mixture inside the fiber wall and around the surface of the fiber. This phenomenon increases the mechanical properties.Figure11(a) shows the fractured surface of the sample, which indicates that the surface has matrix fracture, fiber fracture, and fiber pullout. Fiber pullout happens due to the poor adhesive of fiber and matrix. The fiber carries the load until it gets fractured which improves the mechanical properties. Figure 11 (b) depicts the matrix penetration inside the fiber walls, which increases the fiber-matrix attachment.Figure 11
(a, b) Tensile fractured surface morphology of sample 3.


## 4.1. Tensile Test

Table4 shows the tensile properties of epoxy/SGF/MF with nano-silica hybrid composite. From the table, it was clear that sample 3 (67% epoxy with 30% fiber volume fraction with 3% nano-silica) produces maximum tensile properties (45 N/mm2) compared with other volume fractions. Hence, fiber volume fractions and nano-silica influenced the tensile strength of the developed composite. It was observed that the addition of fiber with the epoxy matrix improves the mechanical properties to the certain level. Fiber percentage more than 30% decreases the matrix-fiber adhesion, leading to the decrease in mechanical properties. Also, increased fiber content beyond 30% will increase the void percentage in the developed composite materials.Table 4
Tensile test result.
Sample IDBreaking load (N)Ultimate stress (N/mm2)Max. displacement (mm)Sample 11315283.5Sample 21610363.7Sample 32760453.4Sample 41448383.2


## 4.2. Flexural Test

Flexural strength also called as bending strength can be measured using a 3-point flexural testing procedure. Flexural strength of the developed composites is listed in Table5. The samples start to crack when the load exceeds the strength of developed samples. The flexural strength (51 N/mm2) of sample 3 is more compared to the remaining developed samples. The presence of mudar fiber, snake grass fiber, and nano-silica increases the flexural strength. The higher flexural strength enhances the load-bearing capacity of samples. Flexural strength variation is very similar to tensile strength results. Adhesion between matrix and fiber reduces when the fiber percentage is more than 30%. It does not allow a significant improvement for further addition of fiber in the sample.Table 5
Flexural test result.
Sample IDBreaking load (N)Ultimate stress (N/mm2)Max. displacement (mm)Sample 11983110.5Sample 21823511.5Sample 3455517.1Sample 4204393.2


## 4.3. Impact Test

The impact test determines the material’s capacity to sustain abrupt shock loads. This test is carried out using an XJJU-50 impact testing machine. The mechanism comprises a loaded striker with set kinetic energy when released. The load will be removed once the specimen manufactured according to the specifications is retained in the machine. The amount of energy absorbed would be shown on display.The impact strength of developed samples is listed in Table6. From Table 6, sample 3 (67% resin +30% fiber + 3% nano-silica) produces the highest impact strength compared to other developed composites. Hence, sample 3 could be the suitable material for high damping and vibration-related applications.Table 6
Impact test results.
Sample IDImpact strength (J)Sample 12.94Sample 23.33Sample 34.50Sample 42.80


## 4.4. SEM Investigation

The surface characteristics of developed samples were analyzed by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Samples were prepared with gold sputter coating for conducting purposes. A fractured tensile sample is shown in Figure9. Sample 3 produces better mechanical properties that show proper bonding between matrix and fiber, resulting in improved tensile, flexural, and impact properties. The crack content and void content are less compared with other samples. Nano-silica increased the flexibility of the matrix, which led to the movement of the mixture inside the fiber wall and around the surface of the fiber. This phenomenon increases the mechanical properties.Figure11(a) shows the fractured surface of the sample, which indicates that the surface has matrix fracture, fiber fracture, and fiber pullout. Fiber pullout happens due to the poor adhesive of fiber and matrix. The fiber carries the load until it gets fractured which improves the mechanical properties. Figure 11 (b) depicts the matrix penetration inside the fiber walls, which increases the fiber-matrix attachment.Figure 11
(a, b) Tensile fractured surface morphology of sample 3.


## 5. Conclusion

The following are the results derived from the experimental research of snake grass fiber and mudar fiber-reinforced epoxy with nano-silica filler composites.This study demonstrates the successful fabrication of nano-silica incorporation with natural fiber-reinforced epoxy composites with varying fiber percentages using the hand layup technique. It has been discovered that differing volume fractions of fiber significantly affect the mechanical characteristics of composites, such as tensile, flexural, and impact strength. For varying breaking loads of fiber, tensile testing of composites is also strongly impacted. The strength of the fiber content at 30% is superior than the fiber content at 10%, 20%, and 40%. The incorporation of nano-silica (3%) provided additional support to improve the properties of the prepared composite materials. The fiber content of 30% has a strong impact strength, which is followed by a reduction. The major ruptured mechanisms are matrix fracture, fiber fracture, and fiber pullout, which were substantiated by SEM images.Fiber filled with resin increased the bonding strength between fiber and matrix. Moreover, incorporation of silica nanofiller increased the cohesive strength of the interlaminar structure. These behavioural changes strengthen the material at the optimum level of 30% hybrid fibers and 3% nano-silica. The prepared sample 3 provides the maximum tensile strength of 45 MPa and the flexural strength of 51 MPa. This result is more significant for fabricating products such as partition board, roof ceiling, circuit board, and roof gutter.



---

*Source: 7805146-2022-01-05.xml*