# Characterization Methods for the Effect of Microbial Mineralization on the Microstructure of Hardened C3S Paste

Authors: Yanqiang Chen; Chunxiang Qian; Hengyi Zhou
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

Microbial mineralization has a significant effect on the hydration process of cement-based materials. This paper mainly studied the characterization methods for hydration degree and hydration product of C3S in hardened paste under microbial mineralization. Quantitative X-ray diffraction (QXRD), thermogravimetric analysis (TG), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) were used and compared. The results showed that microbial mineralization increased the hydration degree of T-C3S. QXRD and EBSD could be used to characterize the content of C3S, and there were few differences between the two methods. TG could accurately characterize the content of Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3 at different depths of the sample, and FT-IR could qualitatively characterize the presence of Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In recent years, microbial mineralization in cement-based materials has become a research focus. Microbial-induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICCP) [1, 2] is a typical biomineralization process which could be used to heal cracks in concrete and enhance the durability of cement-based materials [3]. In addition, new microbial cement-based materials have also been developed [4]. However, the effect of microbial mineralization on cement-based materials was caused by the effect on hydration process. Therefore, it was necessary to study the hydration and its characterization methods.Many traditional methods for characterizing the hydration process of cement-based materials, such as heat evolution method, quantitative XRD (QXRD), differential thermal analysis (TGA), BSE, and so on, were used frequently. However, each method had its limitations.Peiming et al. [5] compared the advantages and disadvantages of hydration heat method, chemically combined water method, Ca(OH)2 quantitative test method, and BSE method; the results showed that the BSE method had a better promising application for the characterization of hydration degree. Kocaba et al. [6] studied the degree of hydration of cement-based materials mixed with blast furnace slag and showed that it was poor to characterize the degree of hydration by the dissolution method and TGA method, while the results of image analysis and isothermal calorimetry were highly consistent. Alexander [7] compared the XRD and BSE methods to characterize the phase composition of the hardened paste, and the results showed that the two characterization methods were also highly consistent.Microbial mineralization consumes Ca(OH)2 in the hardened paste; therefore, the mineralization of microorganisms was closely related to the hydration process of the paste. Basaran Bundur [8] studied the effect of S. pasteurii bacteria on the hydration process of cement-based materials by hydration heat method and showed that there was a great effect of S. pasteurii bacteria on the hydration heat of mortar. Lee [9] also used hydration heat method and XRD method to characterize the effect of bacteria on the hydration of cement-based materials. The results showed that the former method could clearly characterize the early-phase change of the hydration process caused by bacteria, and the latter could characterize the composition change of the phase during the whole hydration process. But for the intermediate products, the limitations were obvious.Microbial mineralization could affect the hydration process and microstructure of cement-based materials by promoting the transformation of Ca (OH)2 to CaCO3. However, the characterization methods of cement hydration under mineralization lacked systematic research. Therefore, in order to systematically characterize the effects of mineralization on cement hydration, this paper mainly discussed the changes in the degree of hydration and products of hardened C3S paste caused by mineralization through different characterization methods and compared the advantages and disadvantages of different characterization methods. The combination of different characterization methods could more accurately characterize the mineralization and hydration processes. In addition, the results of the study will provide a better understanding of mineralization and guide engineering practice.


## 2. Materials and Experimental Design

### 2.1. Raw Materials

#### 2.1.1. Tricalcium Silicate

Before the test of C3S sample, the C3S powder was grinded to below 200 mesh in a dry environment for testing. The XRD pattern of C3S which was collected using a D8-Discover diffractometer (Brook, Germany) is shown in Figure 1. The phases of the samples were mainly C3S and CaO. By comparing C3S crystal standard cards, it was concluded that the crystal form was T-C3S. Fitting was calculated by TOPAS software [10]; the purity of C3S was about 99.05%. The C3S particle size distribution is shown in Figure 2. The particle size of the sample ranged between 3.62 and 70.4 μm, and the average particle size was 13.68 μm. Before the XRF test, the C3S powder and boric acid were added to the pressure equipment and compressed into a tablet, and the element of C3S by XRF (ARL Perform X 4200, Thermo Fisher) is shown in Table 1. In addition to CaO and SiO2, it also contained a small amount of MgO, Al2O3, etc., and the ratio of CaO to SiO2 was 3.04. The specific surface area was 388.29 m2/kg.Figure 1
XRD pattern of C3S.Figure 2
Particle size of C3S.Table 1
Chemical composition of C3S samples by XRF analysis.
OxideCaOSiO2MgOAl2O3Content (%)75.0724.600.150.07Total (%)99.89


#### 2.1.2. Microbial Culture

Paenibacillus was selected and used in the study. Before experiment, Bacillus were domesticated for half a year in an alkaline environment. Medium for culture of the microorganisms is shown in Table 2, and the pH of the medium was adjusted by Ca(OH)2. After the medium was autoclaved at 121°C for 25 min, the bacteria were inoculated into it, and then the inoculated medium was placed in a shaking incubator with an oscillation frequency of 170 r/min and cultured at 30°C for 24 hours. The bacterial growth curve is shown in Figure 3, and the pH of the medium was 12. After 24 hours of culture, the number of bacteria measured by flow cytometry (ACEA D2040R, China) was 2.0 × 108 cells/mL.Table 2
Paenibacillus medium.
NutrientsLiquid medium (g/L)Sucrose10.0Na2HPO4·12H2O2.50MgSO40.50CaCO31.00KCl0.15(NH4)2SO40.50Yeast extract0.30Figure 3
The growth curve ofPaenibacillus (pH = 12).


### 2.2. Biomineralization Experiment Design

In order to characterize the effects of biomineralization on the hydration degree and products of cement-based materials, a set of comparative experiments of mineralization and carbonization was designed. The microbes in the form of a suspension were mixed with C3S powder. The number of microbes added was calculated based on the volume of the suspension. The amount of microorganism suspension added was equal to mixing water. The water–cement ratio was 0.45, the curing temperature was 20 ± 0.5°C, relative humidity was 65 ± 5%, the CO2 concentration was 0.012 mol/L, and the curing time was 7 d. The schematic diagram of the test process is shown in Figure 4.Figure 4
Schematic diagram of mineralization/carbonization setup.


### 2.3. Characterization Methods

#### 2.3.1. Characterization of Crystal Form and Phase Content by QXRD

QXRD was used to quantitatively analyze the crystal form and phase content of cement components. In the XRD quantitative analysis process, in order to reduce the data error, obtaining a higher-quality XRD map was necessary. During fitting the map, the number of the phases selected was gradually increased, so that the error was reduced. In addition, the preferred orientation of the phase was adjusted until the fitting map was similar to the one tested. The QXRD pattern was collected using a D8-Discover diffractometer (Brook, Germany) with a target source of Cu Kα, voltage and current of 40 kV and 30 mA, scan range of 10°–90°, and step size of 0.002°, 0.35 seconds per step. Quantitative analysis was performed by Bruker’s Topas Version 4.2 software [10], and a monoclinic structure of C3S described by Nishi [11] was used. In the process of quantitative analysis, Rwp was used as an indicator of the degree of software fitting and was also the standard of accuracy of the results. In this study, the values of Rwp were between 8.11 and 11.04, which was less than 15. Therefore, the results of Topas 4.2 calculations were credible [10].When preparing test samples, the C3S hardened paste was measured and sized the upper layer of the test piece within 7 mm by using a caliper. The label was marked every 1 mm, and then the sample was polished with a file. Multiple measurements were taken to ensure the evenness of the hardened paste and the accuracy of the sampling depth. During samples preparation, all errors did not exceed 0.1 mm. The schematic diagram is shown in Figure 5. The powder sample obtained was further ground and then immersed in absolute ethanol solution for 3 days to arrest hydration and then dried in a vacuum oven at 60°C for 3 days. Before the test, α-Al2O3 with a mass fraction of 10% was added as an internal standard and uniformly mixed.Figure 5
Schematic diagram of sample processing.


#### 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis of the Content of CaCO3 and Ca(OH)2 at Different Depths

TG was used to determine the Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3 content in the samples. The equipment used was Netzsch STA 449 F3. 5–10 mg of sample powder was placed in a Pt/Rh crucible and heated to 1000°C at 10 K/min in an N2 atmosphere. The mass percentages of Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3 were calculated from the weight loss rate in the thermogravimetric curve. The analysis methods of TG curve mainly included “tangent method” and DTG. Younsi [12] pointed out that the Ca(OH)2 content measured by the “tangent method” was about 20% lower than the actual value, so the analysis method used in this study was DTG.The sample preparation for TG test was similar to that for XRD test, besides that noα-Al2O3 was added in TG.


#### 2.3.3. EBSD-EDS Characterizing Phase Content

For EBSD imaging, the reaction of C3S with water during hydration made the average number of atoms much lower than that of the unhydrated C3S particles, so a strong difference of grayscale was obtained between unreacted (anhydrous) and reaction products (hydrates). Based on the entropy maximization of the GLH curve, image processing was performed by image processing software (Image-Pro Plus 6.0) to extract the area fraction of the gray value. Regarding the processing of the image: first, the threshold of the entropy maximization of the GLH curve was obtained from plurality of images, and then a binary grayscale range image was obtained corresponding to the C3S hardened paste. In addition, the microscope was operated at an acceleration voltage of 15 kV. Images of each sample were collected at magnifications of 250 × (20 fields), 500 × (30 fields), and 1000 × (50 fields).Before the test, the samples were impregnated with epoxy resin and polished, and then the equipment was sprayed with carbon 360 nm using the equipment LEICA ACE600 and then photographed by using a backscattered scanning electron microscope.


#### 2.3.4. FT-IR Qualitative Characterizing Phase

FT-IR was frequently used to characterize functional groups in samples. The principle was that when the sample was irradiated with infrared light with a continuously changing frequency, the molecules absorbed radiation at certain frequencies, so that the intensity of the transmitted light in the absorption region was weakened. The infrared spectrum was obtained by recording the relationship between the percentage transmittance of infrared light and the wave number or wavelength. The device model used during the test was Nicolet iS10, with a spectral range of 500 cm−1–4000 cm−1 and the resolution better than 0.4 cm−1. This method was mainly used for the characterization of Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3.


## 2.1. Raw Materials

### 2.1.1. Tricalcium Silicate

Before the test of C3S sample, the C3S powder was grinded to below 200 mesh in a dry environment for testing. The XRD pattern of C3S which was collected using a D8-Discover diffractometer (Brook, Germany) is shown in Figure 1. The phases of the samples were mainly C3S and CaO. By comparing C3S crystal standard cards, it was concluded that the crystal form was T-C3S. Fitting was calculated by TOPAS software [10]; the purity of C3S was about 99.05%. The C3S particle size distribution is shown in Figure 2. The particle size of the sample ranged between 3.62 and 70.4 μm, and the average particle size was 13.68 μm. Before the XRF test, the C3S powder and boric acid were added to the pressure equipment and compressed into a tablet, and the element of C3S by XRF (ARL Perform X 4200, Thermo Fisher) is shown in Table 1. In addition to CaO and SiO2, it also contained a small amount of MgO, Al2O3, etc., and the ratio of CaO to SiO2 was 3.04. The specific surface area was 388.29 m2/kg.Figure 1
XRD pattern of C3S.Figure 2
Particle size of C3S.Table 1
Chemical composition of C3S samples by XRF analysis.
OxideCaOSiO2MgOAl2O3Content (%)75.0724.600.150.07Total (%)99.89


### 2.1.2. Microbial Culture

Paenibacillus was selected and used in the study. Before experiment, Bacillus were domesticated for half a year in an alkaline environment. Medium for culture of the microorganisms is shown in Table 2, and the pH of the medium was adjusted by Ca(OH)2. After the medium was autoclaved at 121°C for 25 min, the bacteria were inoculated into it, and then the inoculated medium was placed in a shaking incubator with an oscillation frequency of 170 r/min and cultured at 30°C for 24 hours. The bacterial growth curve is shown in Figure 3, and the pH of the medium was 12. After 24 hours of culture, the number of bacteria measured by flow cytometry (ACEA D2040R, China) was 2.0 × 108 cells/mL.Table 2
Paenibacillus medium.
NutrientsLiquid medium (g/L)Sucrose10.0Na2HPO4·12H2O2.50MgSO40.50CaCO31.00KCl0.15(NH4)2SO40.50Yeast extract0.30Figure 3
The growth curve ofPaenibacillus (pH = 12).


## 2.1.1. Tricalcium Silicate

Before the test of C3S sample, the C3S powder was grinded to below 200 mesh in a dry environment for testing. The XRD pattern of C3S which was collected using a D8-Discover diffractometer (Brook, Germany) is shown in Figure 1. The phases of the samples were mainly C3S and CaO. By comparing C3S crystal standard cards, it was concluded that the crystal form was T-C3S. Fitting was calculated by TOPAS software [10]; the purity of C3S was about 99.05%. The C3S particle size distribution is shown in Figure 2. The particle size of the sample ranged between 3.62 and 70.4 μm, and the average particle size was 13.68 μm. Before the XRF test, the C3S powder and boric acid were added to the pressure equipment and compressed into a tablet, and the element of C3S by XRF (ARL Perform X 4200, Thermo Fisher) is shown in Table 1. In addition to CaO and SiO2, it also contained a small amount of MgO, Al2O3, etc., and the ratio of CaO to SiO2 was 3.04. The specific surface area was 388.29 m2/kg.Figure 1
XRD pattern of C3S.Figure 2
Particle size of C3S.Table 1
Chemical composition of C3S samples by XRF analysis.
OxideCaOSiO2MgOAl2O3Content (%)75.0724.600.150.07Total (%)99.89


## 2.1.2. Microbial Culture

Paenibacillus was selected and used in the study. Before experiment, Bacillus were domesticated for half a year in an alkaline environment. Medium for culture of the microorganisms is shown in Table 2, and the pH of the medium was adjusted by Ca(OH)2. After the medium was autoclaved at 121°C for 25 min, the bacteria were inoculated into it, and then the inoculated medium was placed in a shaking incubator with an oscillation frequency of 170 r/min and cultured at 30°C for 24 hours. The bacterial growth curve is shown in Figure 3, and the pH of the medium was 12. After 24 hours of culture, the number of bacteria measured by flow cytometry (ACEA D2040R, China) was 2.0 × 108 cells/mL.Table 2
Paenibacillus medium.
NutrientsLiquid medium (g/L)Sucrose10.0Na2HPO4·12H2O2.50MgSO40.50CaCO31.00KCl0.15(NH4)2SO40.50Yeast extract0.30Figure 3
The growth curve ofPaenibacillus (pH = 12).


## 2.2. Biomineralization Experiment Design

In order to characterize the effects of biomineralization on the hydration degree and products of cement-based materials, a set of comparative experiments of mineralization and carbonization was designed. The microbes in the form of a suspension were mixed with C3S powder. The number of microbes added was calculated based on the volume of the suspension. The amount of microorganism suspension added was equal to mixing water. The water–cement ratio was 0.45, the curing temperature was 20 ± 0.5°C, relative humidity was 65 ± 5%, the CO2 concentration was 0.012 mol/L, and the curing time was 7 d. The schematic diagram of the test process is shown in Figure 4.Figure 4
Schematic diagram of mineralization/carbonization setup.


## 2.3. Characterization Methods

### 2.3.1. Characterization of Crystal Form and Phase Content by QXRD

QXRD was used to quantitatively analyze the crystal form and phase content of cement components. In the XRD quantitative analysis process, in order to reduce the data error, obtaining a higher-quality XRD map was necessary. During fitting the map, the number of the phases selected was gradually increased, so that the error was reduced. In addition, the preferred orientation of the phase was adjusted until the fitting map was similar to the one tested. The QXRD pattern was collected using a D8-Discover diffractometer (Brook, Germany) with a target source of Cu Kα, voltage and current of 40 kV and 30 mA, scan range of 10°–90°, and step size of 0.002°, 0.35 seconds per step. Quantitative analysis was performed by Bruker’s Topas Version 4.2 software [10], and a monoclinic structure of C3S described by Nishi [11] was used. In the process of quantitative analysis, Rwp was used as an indicator of the degree of software fitting and was also the standard of accuracy of the results. In this study, the values of Rwp were between 8.11 and 11.04, which was less than 15. Therefore, the results of Topas 4.2 calculations were credible [10].When preparing test samples, the C3S hardened paste was measured and sized the upper layer of the test piece within 7 mm by using a caliper. The label was marked every 1 mm, and then the sample was polished with a file. Multiple measurements were taken to ensure the evenness of the hardened paste and the accuracy of the sampling depth. During samples preparation, all errors did not exceed 0.1 mm. The schematic diagram is shown in Figure 5. The powder sample obtained was further ground and then immersed in absolute ethanol solution for 3 days to arrest hydration and then dried in a vacuum oven at 60°C for 3 days. Before the test, α-Al2O3 with a mass fraction of 10% was added as an internal standard and uniformly mixed.Figure 5
Schematic diagram of sample processing.


### 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis of the Content of CaCO3 and Ca(OH)2 at Different Depths

TG was used to determine the Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3 content in the samples. The equipment used was Netzsch STA 449 F3. 5–10 mg of sample powder was placed in a Pt/Rh crucible and heated to 1000°C at 10 K/min in an N2 atmosphere. The mass percentages of Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3 were calculated from the weight loss rate in the thermogravimetric curve. The analysis methods of TG curve mainly included “tangent method” and DTG. Younsi [12] pointed out that the Ca(OH)2 content measured by the “tangent method” was about 20% lower than the actual value, so the analysis method used in this study was DTG.The sample preparation for TG test was similar to that for XRD test, besides that noα-Al2O3 was added in TG.


### 2.3.3. EBSD-EDS Characterizing Phase Content

For EBSD imaging, the reaction of C3S with water during hydration made the average number of atoms much lower than that of the unhydrated C3S particles, so a strong difference of grayscale was obtained between unreacted (anhydrous) and reaction products (hydrates). Based on the entropy maximization of the GLH curve, image processing was performed by image processing software (Image-Pro Plus 6.0) to extract the area fraction of the gray value. Regarding the processing of the image: first, the threshold of the entropy maximization of the GLH curve was obtained from plurality of images, and then a binary grayscale range image was obtained corresponding to the C3S hardened paste. In addition, the microscope was operated at an acceleration voltage of 15 kV. Images of each sample were collected at magnifications of 250 × (20 fields), 500 × (30 fields), and 1000 × (50 fields).Before the test, the samples were impregnated with epoxy resin and polished, and then the equipment was sprayed with carbon 360 nm using the equipment LEICA ACE600 and then photographed by using a backscattered scanning electron microscope.


### 2.3.4. FT-IR Qualitative Characterizing Phase

FT-IR was frequently used to characterize functional groups in samples. The principle was that when the sample was irradiated with infrared light with a continuously changing frequency, the molecules absorbed radiation at certain frequencies, so that the intensity of the transmitted light in the absorption region was weakened. The infrared spectrum was obtained by recording the relationship between the percentage transmittance of infrared light and the wave number or wavelength. The device model used during the test was Nicolet iS10, with a spectral range of 500 cm−1–4000 cm−1 and the resolution better than 0.4 cm−1. This method was mainly used for the characterization of Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3.


## 2.3.1. Characterization of Crystal Form and Phase Content by QXRD

QXRD was used to quantitatively analyze the crystal form and phase content of cement components. In the XRD quantitative analysis process, in order to reduce the data error, obtaining a higher-quality XRD map was necessary. During fitting the map, the number of the phases selected was gradually increased, so that the error was reduced. In addition, the preferred orientation of the phase was adjusted until the fitting map was similar to the one tested. The QXRD pattern was collected using a D8-Discover diffractometer (Brook, Germany) with a target source of Cu Kα, voltage and current of 40 kV and 30 mA, scan range of 10°–90°, and step size of 0.002°, 0.35 seconds per step. Quantitative analysis was performed by Bruker’s Topas Version 4.2 software [10], and a monoclinic structure of C3S described by Nishi [11] was used. In the process of quantitative analysis, Rwp was used as an indicator of the degree of software fitting and was also the standard of accuracy of the results. In this study, the values of Rwp were between 8.11 and 11.04, which was less than 15. Therefore, the results of Topas 4.2 calculations were credible [10].When preparing test samples, the C3S hardened paste was measured and sized the upper layer of the test piece within 7 mm by using a caliper. The label was marked every 1 mm, and then the sample was polished with a file. Multiple measurements were taken to ensure the evenness of the hardened paste and the accuracy of the sampling depth. During samples preparation, all errors did not exceed 0.1 mm. The schematic diagram is shown in Figure 5. The powder sample obtained was further ground and then immersed in absolute ethanol solution for 3 days to arrest hydration and then dried in a vacuum oven at 60°C for 3 days. Before the test, α-Al2O3 with a mass fraction of 10% was added as an internal standard and uniformly mixed.Figure 5
Schematic diagram of sample processing.


## 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis of the Content of CaCO3 and Ca(OH)2 at Different Depths

TG was used to determine the Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3 content in the samples. The equipment used was Netzsch STA 449 F3. 5–10 mg of sample powder was placed in a Pt/Rh crucible and heated to 1000°C at 10 K/min in an N2 atmosphere. The mass percentages of Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3 were calculated from the weight loss rate in the thermogravimetric curve. The analysis methods of TG curve mainly included “tangent method” and DTG. Younsi [12] pointed out that the Ca(OH)2 content measured by the “tangent method” was about 20% lower than the actual value, so the analysis method used in this study was DTG.The sample preparation for TG test was similar to that for XRD test, besides that noα-Al2O3 was added in TG.


## 2.3.3. EBSD-EDS Characterizing Phase Content

For EBSD imaging, the reaction of C3S with water during hydration made the average number of atoms much lower than that of the unhydrated C3S particles, so a strong difference of grayscale was obtained between unreacted (anhydrous) and reaction products (hydrates). Based on the entropy maximization of the GLH curve, image processing was performed by image processing software (Image-Pro Plus 6.0) to extract the area fraction of the gray value. Regarding the processing of the image: first, the threshold of the entropy maximization of the GLH curve was obtained from plurality of images, and then a binary grayscale range image was obtained corresponding to the C3S hardened paste. In addition, the microscope was operated at an acceleration voltage of 15 kV. Images of each sample were collected at magnifications of 250 × (20 fields), 500 × (30 fields), and 1000 × (50 fields).Before the test, the samples were impregnated with epoxy resin and polished, and then the equipment was sprayed with carbon 360 nm using the equipment LEICA ACE600 and then photographed by using a backscattered scanning electron microscope.


## 2.3.4. FT-IR Qualitative Characterizing Phase

FT-IR was frequently used to characterize functional groups in samples. The principle was that when the sample was irradiated with infrared light with a continuously changing frequency, the molecules absorbed radiation at certain frequencies, so that the intensity of the transmitted light in the absorption region was weakened. The infrared spectrum was obtained by recording the relationship between the percentage transmittance of infrared light and the wave number or wavelength. The device model used during the test was Nicolet iS10, with a spectral range of 500 cm−1–4000 cm−1 and the resolution better than 0.4 cm−1. This method was mainly used for the characterization of Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Characterization of Crystal Form and Phase Content by QXRD

XRD test was performed on mineralized and carbonized samples at different depths. The results within about 1 mm of the surface layer are shown in Figure6. Among them, B was the mineralization group and C was the carbonization group (the same applies hereinafter). From the figure, there was a significant difference in the peak intensity near 29.4°, and by comparing the crystal forms, it was analyzed as calcite, indicating that the crystallinity of CaCO3 within 1 mm of the surface layer of the mineralized group was better than that of the carbonized group. In addition, it could be seen from the figure that there was no peak at 18.4° within 0-1 mm of the surface layer, indicating that the Ca(OH)2 was completely mineralized or carbonized in the previous period.Figure 6
Comparison of CaCO3 peak intensity within about 1 mm of the surface layer.Through Topas software, quantitative analysis of XRD patterns of T-C3S hardened paste at different depths is shown in Figure 7. As shown in Figure 7, the residual amount of C3S in the mineralization group samples was lower than that of the carbonization group at different depths, indicating that the addition of microorganisms promoted the hydration of C3S. It was known from the literature that the decrease in C3S content in mineralized samples might be related to bacteria as nucleation sites and then promote hydration. The above tests showed that QXRD could be used to characterize the degree of hydration of cement-based materials and perform phase analysis.Figure 7
Remaining amount of C3S at different depths in the surface layer.


### 3.2. Quantitative Analysis of the Content of CaCO3 and Ca(OH)2

TG test was performed at different depths within surface layer of the mineralization group and the carbonization group, and the curve is shown in Figure8. By analyzing and calculating the TG curve in Figure 8, the content of Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3 at different depths was obtained, as shown in Figure 9. It could be seen that CaCO3 in the mineralized group was higher than that in the carbonized group, which indicated that the mineralization promoted the formation of CaCO3. From the curve of Ca(OH)2 in Figure 9, it was concluded that within 4 mm of the surface layer, the content of Ca(OH)2 was lower than the carbonization group. This was due to Ca(OH)2 mineralized to CaCO3. In 4–7 mm, the content of Ca(OH)2 in the mineralized group was higher than that in the carbonized group, that is, the mineralization promoted the hydration of C3S, and more Ca(OH)2 was produced, which was consistent with the results of QXRD. In addition, from Figure 8, the weight loss of the mineralized group and the carbonized group at 1000°C was slightly different within the range of 0–2 mm, the weight loss of the mineralized group was slightly higher than that of the carbonized group. The reason was that mineralization promoted the reaction between CO2 and Ca(OH)2, so the weight loss rate of the mineralized group was high.Figure 8
Mass loss curves at different depths of samples in the mineralization group (a) and the carbonization group (b).
(a)(b)Figure 9
Content of CaCO3 (a) and Ca(OH)2 (b) at different depths of samples.
(a)(b)


### 3.3. EBSD-EDS Characterization of the Content of the Phases

By cutting the samples longitudinally and then performing BSE shooting at different magnifications, as shown in Figure10. The magnification used in this test was ×250 for statistics and ×1000 for analysis.Figure 10
BSE image of the surface layer of the mineralization group (a) and carbonization group (b) (0∼1 ± 0.3 mm).
(a)(b)At a magnification of ×250, more than three photos were taken. The software Image-Pro Plus 6.0 was used to analyze the grayscale of photos. Figure11 shows the grayscale distribution of BSE images under this test conditions. Combining the energy spectrum and the literature, it could be seen that the first peak corresponds to the pore, the second peak corresponds to the phase C-S-H, the third peak corresponds to the phase of Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3, and the fourth peak corresponds to the unhydrated particles. The threshold was further determined according to Figure 12.Figure 11
Gray distribution of BSE images of the BSE images.Figure 12
Corresponding map of BSE gray distribution and EDS. (a) The original line scan. (b) Postproduction, in order to facilitate observation and analysis. (c) The map of Ca/Si and gray value.
(a)(b)(c)From Figure12, it was concluded that the Ca/Si in region I was about 3, which was unhydrated C3S; in region II, the Si content was close to 0, which was Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3. From Figure (c), it could be concluded that the grayscale values at I, II, and III were greatly different when passing through different grayscale areas at the line scanning, and the grayscale values changed greatly at the connection points. Combining the gray distribution of the whole picture, area I was unhydrated C3S, area II was Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3, and area III was C-S-H and some pores.Combining the above methods, rendering was performed at different gray values, as shown in Figure13.Figure 13
Color rendering of the EBSD picture based on the gray value.
(a)(b)Combined with the literature, it was calculated that the C3S content of the surface layer of the mineralization group within the range of 0-1 mm was 11.30 ± 1.64%, and the content of Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3 was 67.34 ± 1.49%. The porosity was 21.36 ± 2.19%; the C3S content in the 0-1 mm surface layer of the carbonization group was 14.1 ± 1.24%, and the content of Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3 was 60.17 ± 1.19%. The porosity was 25.73 ± 1.98%. The above data showed that microbial mineralization promoted the hydration of T-C3S, which was consistent with the QXRD test results. In addition, the mineralization of microorganisms reduced the porosity of the surface layer.


### 3.4. FT-IR

In the T-C3S hardened paste of the mineralization group and the carbonization group, a small amount of samples was taken at different depths for FT-IR testing. The results are shown in Figure 14.Figure 14
Infrared curves of samples in the mineralization group (a) and carbonization group (b).
(a)(b)In Figure14, the vibrational peak at a wavelength of 3443 cm−1 represents –OH, and the vibrational peak at a wavelength of 713 cm−1, 874 cm−1, and 1797 cm−1 represents CO32−. It could be seen that within 0–3 mm, the peak value of the sample in the mineralization group at 874 cm−1 was more obvious than that of the carbonization group. It reflects that the addition of microorganisms promoted the formation of CaCO3 to some extent.


### 3.5. Comparisons

By combining the four characterization methods of QXRD, TG, EBSD, and FT-IR, the morphology, phase content, porosity, and main functional groups of cement-based materials with microbial mineralization could be obtained. QXRD, TG, and EBSD could quantitatively characterize the phases, while the results of FT-IR were qualitative. Because of the good fitting effect of QXRD results on crystal, it could be used to quantify the content of C3S. However, the fitting results of Ca(OH)2 were lower which actually were due to its amorphous phase. TG could accurately determine the contents of Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3 according to the loss of combustion.Different phases could be distinguished according to the gray value by EBSD. The quantitative results of C3S content in the mineralized surface obtained by comparing EBSD and QXRD are shown in Table 3. It could be seen that for the C3S content within 0-1 mm of the surface layer of the mineralization group and the carbonization group, the results obtained by the two characterization methods were relatively consistent, indicating that the data obtained by both characterization methods were reliable.Table 3
Comparison of quantitative results of C3S content between EBSD and QXRD.
Remaining amount of C3S-B (%)Remaining amount of C3S-C (%)QXRD11.46 ± 1.2113.42 ± 1.32EBSD11.30 ± 1.6414.10 ± 1.24


## 3.1. Characterization of Crystal Form and Phase Content by QXRD

XRD test was performed on mineralized and carbonized samples at different depths. The results within about 1 mm of the surface layer are shown in Figure6. Among them, B was the mineralization group and C was the carbonization group (the same applies hereinafter). From the figure, there was a significant difference in the peak intensity near 29.4°, and by comparing the crystal forms, it was analyzed as calcite, indicating that the crystallinity of CaCO3 within 1 mm of the surface layer of the mineralized group was better than that of the carbonized group. In addition, it could be seen from the figure that there was no peak at 18.4° within 0-1 mm of the surface layer, indicating that the Ca(OH)2 was completely mineralized or carbonized in the previous period.Figure 6
Comparison of CaCO3 peak intensity within about 1 mm of the surface layer.Through Topas software, quantitative analysis of XRD patterns of T-C3S hardened paste at different depths is shown in Figure 7. As shown in Figure 7, the residual amount of C3S in the mineralization group samples was lower than that of the carbonization group at different depths, indicating that the addition of microorganisms promoted the hydration of C3S. It was known from the literature that the decrease in C3S content in mineralized samples might be related to bacteria as nucleation sites and then promote hydration. The above tests showed that QXRD could be used to characterize the degree of hydration of cement-based materials and perform phase analysis.Figure 7
Remaining amount of C3S at different depths in the surface layer.


## 3.2. Quantitative Analysis of the Content of CaCO3 and Ca(OH)2

TG test was performed at different depths within surface layer of the mineralization group and the carbonization group, and the curve is shown in Figure8. By analyzing and calculating the TG curve in Figure 8, the content of Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3 at different depths was obtained, as shown in Figure 9. It could be seen that CaCO3 in the mineralized group was higher than that in the carbonized group, which indicated that the mineralization promoted the formation of CaCO3. From the curve of Ca(OH)2 in Figure 9, it was concluded that within 4 mm of the surface layer, the content of Ca(OH)2 was lower than the carbonization group. This was due to Ca(OH)2 mineralized to CaCO3. In 4–7 mm, the content of Ca(OH)2 in the mineralized group was higher than that in the carbonized group, that is, the mineralization promoted the hydration of C3S, and more Ca(OH)2 was produced, which was consistent with the results of QXRD. In addition, from Figure 8, the weight loss of the mineralized group and the carbonized group at 1000°C was slightly different within the range of 0–2 mm, the weight loss of the mineralized group was slightly higher than that of the carbonized group. The reason was that mineralization promoted the reaction between CO2 and Ca(OH)2, so the weight loss rate of the mineralized group was high.Figure 8
Mass loss curves at different depths of samples in the mineralization group (a) and the carbonization group (b).
(a)(b)Figure 9
Content of CaCO3 (a) and Ca(OH)2 (b) at different depths of samples.
(a)(b)


## 3.3. EBSD-EDS Characterization of the Content of the Phases

By cutting the samples longitudinally and then performing BSE shooting at different magnifications, as shown in Figure10. The magnification used in this test was ×250 for statistics and ×1000 for analysis.Figure 10
BSE image of the surface layer of the mineralization group (a) and carbonization group (b) (0∼1 ± 0.3 mm).
(a)(b)At a magnification of ×250, more than three photos were taken. The software Image-Pro Plus 6.0 was used to analyze the grayscale of photos. Figure11 shows the grayscale distribution of BSE images under this test conditions. Combining the energy spectrum and the literature, it could be seen that the first peak corresponds to the pore, the second peak corresponds to the phase C-S-H, the third peak corresponds to the phase of Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3, and the fourth peak corresponds to the unhydrated particles. The threshold was further determined according to Figure 12.Figure 11
Gray distribution of BSE images of the BSE images.Figure 12
Corresponding map of BSE gray distribution and EDS. (a) The original line scan. (b) Postproduction, in order to facilitate observation and analysis. (c) The map of Ca/Si and gray value.
(a)(b)(c)From Figure12, it was concluded that the Ca/Si in region I was about 3, which was unhydrated C3S; in region II, the Si content was close to 0, which was Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3. From Figure (c), it could be concluded that the grayscale values at I, II, and III were greatly different when passing through different grayscale areas at the line scanning, and the grayscale values changed greatly at the connection points. Combining the gray distribution of the whole picture, area I was unhydrated C3S, area II was Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3, and area III was C-S-H and some pores.Combining the above methods, rendering was performed at different gray values, as shown in Figure13.Figure 13
Color rendering of the EBSD picture based on the gray value.
(a)(b)Combined with the literature, it was calculated that the C3S content of the surface layer of the mineralization group within the range of 0-1 mm was 11.30 ± 1.64%, and the content of Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3 was 67.34 ± 1.49%. The porosity was 21.36 ± 2.19%; the C3S content in the 0-1 mm surface layer of the carbonization group was 14.1 ± 1.24%, and the content of Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3 was 60.17 ± 1.19%. The porosity was 25.73 ± 1.98%. The above data showed that microbial mineralization promoted the hydration of T-C3S, which was consistent with the QXRD test results. In addition, the mineralization of microorganisms reduced the porosity of the surface layer.


## 3.4. FT-IR

In the T-C3S hardened paste of the mineralization group and the carbonization group, a small amount of samples was taken at different depths for FT-IR testing. The results are shown in Figure 14.Figure 14
Infrared curves of samples in the mineralization group (a) and carbonization group (b).
(a)(b)In Figure14, the vibrational peak at a wavelength of 3443 cm−1 represents –OH, and the vibrational peak at a wavelength of 713 cm−1, 874 cm−1, and 1797 cm−1 represents CO32−. It could be seen that within 0–3 mm, the peak value of the sample in the mineralization group at 874 cm−1 was more obvious than that of the carbonization group. It reflects that the addition of microorganisms promoted the formation of CaCO3 to some extent.


## 3.5. Comparisons

By combining the four characterization methods of QXRD, TG, EBSD, and FT-IR, the morphology, phase content, porosity, and main functional groups of cement-based materials with microbial mineralization could be obtained. QXRD, TG, and EBSD could quantitatively characterize the phases, while the results of FT-IR were qualitative. Because of the good fitting effect of QXRD results on crystal, it could be used to quantify the content of C3S. However, the fitting results of Ca(OH)2 were lower which actually were due to its amorphous phase. TG could accurately determine the contents of Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3 according to the loss of combustion.Different phases could be distinguished according to the gray value by EBSD. The quantitative results of C3S content in the mineralized surface obtained by comparing EBSD and QXRD are shown in Table 3. It could be seen that for the C3S content within 0-1 mm of the surface layer of the mineralization group and the carbonization group, the results obtained by the two characterization methods were relatively consistent, indicating that the data obtained by both characterization methods were reliable.Table 3
Comparison of quantitative results of C3S content between EBSD and QXRD.
Remaining amount of C3S-B (%)Remaining amount of C3S-C (%)QXRD11.46 ± 1.2113.42 ± 1.32EBSD11.30 ± 1.6414.10 ± 1.24


## 4. Conclusions

QXRD, TG/DSC, BSE, and FT-IR were used to study the effect of microbial mineralization on the hydration process of C3S and microstructure of hardened C3S pastes. The results showed that microbial mineralization promoted the hydration of T-C3S. QXRD and EBSD/ESD could accurately characterize the content of C3S, and the differences between the two characterization methods were minute. The content of Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3 at different depths of the sample could be exhaustively analyzed by TG/DSC, and FT-IR could qualitatively characterize the content of CaCO3.



---

*Source: 7869345-2020-08-18.xml*