# The Effect of Apigenin on Pharmacokinetics of Imatinib and Its Metabolite N-Desmethyl Imatinib in Rats

Authors: Xian-yun Liu; Tao Xu; Wan-shu Li; Jun Luo; Pei-wu Geng; Li Wang; Meng-ming Xia; Meng-chun Chen; Lei Yu; Guo-xin Hu
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of apigenin on the pharmacokinetics of imatinib and N-desmethyl imatinib in rats. Healthy male SD rats were randomly divided into four groups: A group (the control group), B group (the long-term administration of 165 mg/kg apigenin for 15 days), C group (a single dose of 165 mg/kg apigenin), and D group (a single dose of 252 mg/kg apigenin). The serum concentrations of imatinib and N-desmethyl imatinib were measured by HPLC, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using DAS 3.0 software. The parameters ofAUC(0-t), AUC(0−∞), Tmax, Vz/F, and CLz/F for imatinib in group B were different from those in group A (P<0.05). Besides, MRT(0−t) and MRT(0−∞) in groups C and D differed distinctly from those in group A as well. The parameters of AUC(0-t) and Cmax for N-desmethyl imatinib in group C were significantly lower than those in group A (P<0.05); however, compared with groups B and D, the magnitude of effect was modest. Those results indicated that apigenin in the short-term study inhibited the metabolism of imatinib and its metabolite N-desmethyl imatinib, while in the long-term study the metabolism could be accelerated.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Imatinib (Figure1(a)), as we know, is a phenylamino pyrimidine derivative and a member of a new class of drugs collectively known as signal transduction inhibitors which interferes with cellular proliferation and induces apoptosis of BCR-ABL cells [1]; also imatinib interferes with the receptor tyrosine kinases for platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), stem cell factor (SCF), and c-Kit and inhibits PDGF and SCF-mediated cellular activity in vitro [2, 3].Chemical structures of imatinib (a) and apigenin (b).
(a)
(b)Imatinib mesylate is approved for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in blast crisis [4], the accelerated phase of disease, or in the chronic phase of disease after not responding to interferon-α therapy. Studies are also being conducted to evaluate the drug in treating gastrointestinal (GI) stromal tumors (GIST, a form of sarcoma) [5], small-cell lung cancer, prostate cancer, and glioblastoma.The major enzyme responsible for the metabolism of imatinib is CYP3A4. Other cytochrome P450 enzymes, such as CYP1A2, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19, play a minor role in its metabolism. N-Demethylated piperazine derivative, which is the major circulating metabolite of imatinib, possesses in vitro activity comparable to that of imatinib [6].Apigenin is a common flavonoid presented in a variety of plants, vegetables, fruits, and herbs, some of which are widely marketed as dietary and herbal supplements [7–11]. As an antiaggregatory, antioxidant, antibacterial, and hypertension prevention substance [12–14], the chemical structure of apigenin is showed in Figure 1(b). In addition, apigenin, to some extent, is a potent inhibitor of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system [15–17] which is responsible for the metabolism of considerable pharmaceutical drugs.Several important and clinically relevant interactions between flavonoids and conventional drugs have been reported over the last few years. Although various biological functions of apigenin have been demonstrated in many studies, its role in health promotion mainly depends on the intaking amount and bioavailability [9]. Given the widespread availability of apigenin, it is important to understand what effects its concomitant use may have on the disposition of medications (e.g., calcium channel blockers, antidepressants, benzodiazepines, and immunosuppressants). Specifically, induction of CYP metabolism could result in lower circulating drug concentrations, which could in turn lead to a reduction in efficacy.Concurrent administration of other drugs or herbal products that modulate cytochrome P450 enzymes activity may alter imatinib exposure. Therefore, a combination of flavonoids and imatinib is expected. In this study, we developed a high performance liquid chromatography method for the simultaneous determination of imatinib and N-desmethyl imatinib in rat serum. The pharmacokinetics of imatinib and N-desmethyl imatinib in rats was detected after administration of apigenin.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Apigenin (lot no. 520365, purity > 98.0%) was purchased from Xian Xiao Cao Botanical Development Company (Xian, China). Imatinib, N-desmethyl imatinib, and phenacetin (both purity > 98.0%) were the gifts from Rockefeller University (New York, USA). HPLC grade acetonitrile and methanol were purchased from Merck Company (Darmstadt, Germany). All other chemicals were analytical grade and used without further purification. Purified water was prepared in-house with a Milli-Q water system from Millipore (Bedford, MA, USA).


### 2.2. Equipment and Conditions

HPLC system (Agilent 1100) was equipped with quaternary pump, on-line vacuum degasser, autosampler, column compartment, diode array detector, and Agilent Chem Station Rev A.10.02. Chromatographic separation was achieved using an Agilent ZORBAX SB-C18 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5μm) at 40°C at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The concentrations of imatinib and N-desmethyl imatinib were analyzed using water-0.1% trifluoroacetic acid-acetonitrile (61 : 20 : 19, v/v/v) as the mobile phase. The detection wavelength was 282 nm, and the injection volume was 20.0 μL.


### 2.3. Animals and Treatment

The Sprague-Dawley male rats (240±20 g) were purchased from Shanghai CLAC Laboratory Animal Co, Ltd (Certificate no. 2007-0005). The rats were acclimatized for 7 days to laboratory conditions before initiating the experiment. Necessary approval from the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee was obtained to carry out the experiments.


### 2.4. Calibration Standards and Quality Control Samples

Stock solutions of imatinib (1 mg/mL), N-desmethyl imatinib (1 mg/mL) and IS (1 mg/mL) were separately prepared in 25 mL volumetric flasks with methanol and stored at 277 K. Working solutions for calibration and controls were prepared from the stock solution by dilution using methanol. The IS working solution (100μg/mL) was prepared by diluting its stock solution with methanol. Imatinib calibration curves were prepared using blank serum spiked at concentrations of 0.10, 0.25, 0.50, 1.00, 2.50, 5.00, 10.00, and 20.00 μg/mL. N-Desmethyl imatinib calibration curves were prepared using blank serum spiked at concentrations of 0.01, 0.025, 0.05, 0.10, 0.25, 0.50, 1.00, and 2.00 μg/mL.


### 2.5. Pharmacokinetic Experiment

Twenty Sprague-Dawley male rats were divided into 4 groups: A group (the control group with 0.5% CMC-Na as solvent), B group (long-term administration of 165 mg/kg apigenin for 15 days), C group (a single dose of 165 mg/kg apigenin), and D group (a single dose of 252 mg/kg apigenin). After the last administration of apigenin or 0.5% CMC-Na, the rat in each group was given a single dose of 30 mg/kg imatinib. Blood samples (500μL) were directly collected into a clean tube from the tail vein at 0 (prior to dosing), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h after oral administration; serum was separated by centrifuging at 5000 rpm for 10 min and kept frozen at −80°C until analysis.


### 2.6. Sample Preparation

The serum samples were prepared using liquid-liquid extraction technique. A 300μL aliquot of the serum sample was taken in a 10 mL glass test tube, and on that 20 μL of IS (100 μg/mL) was spiked and 150 μL of sodium hydroxide solution (0.01 moL/L) was added. After vortex mixing for 30 s, 3 mL of ethyl acetate was added, and the mixture was vortexed for 1 min and then centrifuged at 3000 ×g for 5 min. The organic layer was transferred into another 5 mL tube and evaporated to dryness under a stream of nitrogen gas at 40°C. The residue was reconstituted in 100 μL of mobile phase and vortex-mixed for 1 min, and 20 μL of aliquot was injected into the HPLC system for analysis.


### 2.7. Statistical Analysis

Experimental values were expressed asx-±s. Statistical analyses of main pharmacokinetic parameters were performed by Student’s unpaired test using SPSS 16.0 software. A value of P<0.05 was considered to be significant between two groups.


## 2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Apigenin (lot no. 520365, purity > 98.0%) was purchased from Xian Xiao Cao Botanical Development Company (Xian, China). Imatinib, N-desmethyl imatinib, and phenacetin (both purity > 98.0%) were the gifts from Rockefeller University (New York, USA). HPLC grade acetonitrile and methanol were purchased from Merck Company (Darmstadt, Germany). All other chemicals were analytical grade and used without further purification. Purified water was prepared in-house with a Milli-Q water system from Millipore (Bedford, MA, USA).


## 2.2. Equipment and Conditions

HPLC system (Agilent 1100) was equipped with quaternary pump, on-line vacuum degasser, autosampler, column compartment, diode array detector, and Agilent Chem Station Rev A.10.02. Chromatographic separation was achieved using an Agilent ZORBAX SB-C18 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5μm) at 40°C at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The concentrations of imatinib and N-desmethyl imatinib were analyzed using water-0.1% trifluoroacetic acid-acetonitrile (61 : 20 : 19, v/v/v) as the mobile phase. The detection wavelength was 282 nm, and the injection volume was 20.0 μL.


## 2.3. Animals and Treatment

The Sprague-Dawley male rats (240±20 g) were purchased from Shanghai CLAC Laboratory Animal Co, Ltd (Certificate no. 2007-0005). The rats were acclimatized for 7 days to laboratory conditions before initiating the experiment. Necessary approval from the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee was obtained to carry out the experiments.


## 2.4. Calibration Standards and Quality Control Samples

Stock solutions of imatinib (1 mg/mL), N-desmethyl imatinib (1 mg/mL) and IS (1 mg/mL) were separately prepared in 25 mL volumetric flasks with methanol and stored at 277 K. Working solutions for calibration and controls were prepared from the stock solution by dilution using methanol. The IS working solution (100μg/mL) was prepared by diluting its stock solution with methanol. Imatinib calibration curves were prepared using blank serum spiked at concentrations of 0.10, 0.25, 0.50, 1.00, 2.50, 5.00, 10.00, and 20.00 μg/mL. N-Desmethyl imatinib calibration curves were prepared using blank serum spiked at concentrations of 0.01, 0.025, 0.05, 0.10, 0.25, 0.50, 1.00, and 2.00 μg/mL.


## 2.5. Pharmacokinetic Experiment

Twenty Sprague-Dawley male rats were divided into 4 groups: A group (the control group with 0.5% CMC-Na as solvent), B group (long-term administration of 165 mg/kg apigenin for 15 days), C group (a single dose of 165 mg/kg apigenin), and D group (a single dose of 252 mg/kg apigenin). After the last administration of apigenin or 0.5% CMC-Na, the rat in each group was given a single dose of 30 mg/kg imatinib. Blood samples (500μL) were directly collected into a clean tube from the tail vein at 0 (prior to dosing), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h after oral administration; serum was separated by centrifuging at 5000 rpm for 10 min and kept frozen at −80°C until analysis.


## 2.6. Sample Preparation

The serum samples were prepared using liquid-liquid extraction technique. A 300μL aliquot of the serum sample was taken in a 10 mL glass test tube, and on that 20 μL of IS (100 μg/mL) was spiked and 150 μL of sodium hydroxide solution (0.01 moL/L) was added. After vortex mixing for 30 s, 3 mL of ethyl acetate was added, and the mixture was vortexed for 1 min and then centrifuged at 3000 ×g for 5 min. The organic layer was transferred into another 5 mL tube and evaporated to dryness under a stream of nitrogen gas at 40°C. The residue was reconstituted in 100 μL of mobile phase and vortex-mixed for 1 min, and 20 μL of aliquot was injected into the HPLC system for analysis.


## 2.7. Statistical Analysis

Experimental values were expressed asx-±s. Statistical analyses of main pharmacokinetic parameters were performed by Student’s unpaired test using SPSS 16.0 software. A value of P<0.05 was considered to be significant between two groups.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Method Validation

In our study, the resolution of N-desmethyl imatinib, imatinib, and internal standard was satisfactory. No interference can be observed in the HPLC chromatograms. The retention times of N-desmethyl imatinib, imatinib, and internal standard were 4.7 min, 6.2 min, and 11.4 min, respectively. The HPLC chromatograms were shown in Figure2.HPLC chromatograms of imatinib and N-desmethyl imatinib. (a) Representative chromatograms of blank serum. (b) Representative chromatograms of imatinib (5μg/mL) and N-desmethyl imatinib (0.5 μg/mL). (c) Representative chromatograms of the serum spiked with imatinib (2.5 μg/mL) and N-desmethyl imatinib (0.25 μg/mL). (d) Representative chromatograms of the serum obtained at 3 h after a single oral dose of 30 mg/kg imatinib. A: N-desmethyl imatinib, B: imatinib, and C: phenacetin.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The regression equation of imatinib wasY1=0.1905X1-0.0298 (r=0.9999) and its lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) was 0.10 μg/mL; the regression equation of N-desmethyl imatinib was Y2=0.4757X2-0.0088 (r=0.9997) and its LLOQ was 0.01 μg/mL. Both intraday and interday precisions were all less than 4.90% for imatinib and 6.26% for N-desmethyl imatinib. The method showed that the relative recoveries of imatinib and N-desmethyl imatinib were all more than 94%, whilst the absolute recoveries were all more than 76%. Blood samples at room temperature and in freezed condition showed good stability. So the method could be well applied for determinations of imatinib and N-desmethyl imatinib in rat plasma.


### 3.2. Effects of Long-Term 165 mg/kg Apigenin on Imatinib and N-Desmethyl Imatinib

The experiment results of pharmacokinetic parameters revealed that the data ofAUC(0-t), AUC(0-∞), Tmax, Vz/F, and CLz/F had a significant difference between group A and group B (P<0.05) (Figure 3, Table 1). To be specific, the figures of AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-∞) in group B were 24.8% and 24.4% lower than those in group A, respectively, while the values of Vz/F and CLz/F in group B increased by 100.1% and 31.3%. On the contrary, the main pharmacokinetic parameters of N-desmethyl imatinib had no great differences between the two groups.Table 1
The main pharmacokinetic parameters of imatinib in four groups (n=5).
Parameters
A
B
C
D
AU
C
(
0
–
t
) (mg·h·L−1)
90.618
±
11.34
68.158
±
7.279
*
126.678
±
12.499
*
,
*
*
113.095
±
8.918
*
,
*
*
AU
C
(
0
–
∞
) (mg·h·L−1)
90.988
±
11.585
68.805
±
7.432
*
127.514
±
12.332
*
,
*
*
114.502
±
8.634
*
,
*
*
MR
T
(
0
–
t
) (h)
5.718
±
0.274
5.479
±
0.512
6.121
±
0.33
*
*
6.049
±
0.351
*
*
MR
T
(
0
–
∞
) (h)
5.804
±
0.376
5.707
±
0.579
6.274
±
0.337
*
*
6.337
±
0.532
*
*
t
(
1
/
2
)
z
(h)
2.304
±
0.954
3.423
±
1.361
2.82
±
1.069
3.456
±
0.418
T
max (h)
3
.
0
±
1
.
003
2
.
0
±
0
.
004
*
3.8
±
0.447
*
*
3.6
±
0.548
*
*
V
z
/
F
(kg·L−1)
1.081
±
0.372
2.163
±
0.875
*
0.971
±
0.396
*
*
1.315
±
0.209
*
*
CL
z
/
F
(L·min−1·kg−1)
0.335
±
0.051
0.44
±
0.05
*
0.237
±
0.023
*
,
*
*
0.263
±
0.019
*
,
*
*
C
max (mg·L−1)
12.074
±
2.023
10.544
±
0.931
15.583
±
0.86
*
,
*
*
14.388
±
1.753
*
,
*
*
*
P < 0.05 in comparison to group A; **P < 0.05 in comparison to group B.Figure 3
Mean concentration-time curve of imatinib in four groups (n=5).


### 3.3. Effects of Short-Term 165 mg/kg Apigenin on Imatinib and N-Desmethyl Imatinib

The main pharmacokinetic parameters of imatinib such asAUC(0-t), AUC(0-∞), CLz/F, and Cmax were significantly distinct between group C and group A (P<0.05) (Figure 3, Table 1). Specifically, the values of AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-∞) in group C were 39.8% and 40.1% higher than those of group A, respectively. Concerned with Vz/F, CLz/F, and Cmax, pharmacokinetic parameters diminished by 10.2%, 29.3%, and 29.1%, respectively; as to t(1/2)z, the magnitude of effect was modest in group C.Referred to the main pharmacokinetic parameters of imatinib, such asAUC(0-t), AUC(0-∞), MRT(0-t), MRT(0-∞), Tmax, Vz/F, CLz/F, and Cmax, the results vary a lot between group B and group C (P<0.05) (Figure 3, Table 1). To be specific, the figures of AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-∞) in group C were approximately 85% higher than the two indexes in group B. While the values of Vz/F and CLz/F in group B both dropped a bit more decreased by 55.1% and 46.1%, respectively.In comparison with group B, theAUC(0-t) and Cmax of N-desmethyl imatinib increased by 19.7% and 19.3%, respectively (Figure 4, Table 2).Table 2
The main pharmacokinetic parameters of N-desmethyl imatinib in four groups (n=5).
Parameters
A
B
C
D
AU
C
(
0
–
t
) (mg·h·L−1)
5.977
±
1.626
6.335
±
1.105
4.797
±
0.602
*
*
5.262
±
0.89
AU
C
(
0
–
∞
) (mg·h·L−1)
6.827
±
2.595
6.672
±
0.797
5.05
±
0.797
5.545
±
0.814
MR
T
(
0
–
t
) (h)
7.085
±
1.135
6.573
±
0.544
7.227
±
0.525
7.326
±
0.53
MR
T
(
0
–
∞
) (h)
9.718
±
4.636
7.504
±
0.189
8.397
±
1.545
8.679
±
1.301
t
(
1
/
2
)
z
(h)
5.495
±
3.92
4.083
±
0.436
4.906
±
2.093
5.376
±
1.495
T
max (h)
3.6
±
0.894
4
.
0
±
0
.
003
4
.
0
±
0
.
005
3.8
±
0.447
V
z
/
F
(kg·L−1)
32.802
±
10.255
26.843
±
4.486
40.738
±
12.777
43.512
±
16.116
*
*
CL
z
/
F
(L·min−1·kg−1)
4.913
±
1.782
4.552
±
0.592
6.066
±
0.992
5.507
±
0.834
C
max (mg·L−1)
0.678
±
0.147
0.797
±
0.073
0.547
±
0.091
*
*
0.639
±
0.13
*
*
*
P < 0.05 in comparison to group A; **P < 0.05 in comparison to group B.Figure 4
Mean concentration-time curve of N-desmethyl imatinib in four groups (n=5).


### 3.4. Effects of Short-Term 252 mg/kg Apigenin on Imatinib and N-Desmethyl Imatinib

Similar to group C, the parameters of imatinib in group D revealed an enormous difference from group A and group B as well, but not to the extent of that in group C. The details were displayed in Figure3 and Table 1.Compared with group B, theVz/F of N-desmethyl imatinib demonstrated a decrease by 62.10%, and Cmax which reduced by 19.82% had a similar downward trend with Vz/F (Figure 4 and Table 2).


## 3.1. Method Validation

In our study, the resolution of N-desmethyl imatinib, imatinib, and internal standard was satisfactory. No interference can be observed in the HPLC chromatograms. The retention times of N-desmethyl imatinib, imatinib, and internal standard were 4.7 min, 6.2 min, and 11.4 min, respectively. The HPLC chromatograms were shown in Figure2.HPLC chromatograms of imatinib and N-desmethyl imatinib. (a) Representative chromatograms of blank serum. (b) Representative chromatograms of imatinib (5μg/mL) and N-desmethyl imatinib (0.5 μg/mL). (c) Representative chromatograms of the serum spiked with imatinib (2.5 μg/mL) and N-desmethyl imatinib (0.25 μg/mL). (d) Representative chromatograms of the serum obtained at 3 h after a single oral dose of 30 mg/kg imatinib. A: N-desmethyl imatinib, B: imatinib, and C: phenacetin.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The regression equation of imatinib wasY1=0.1905X1-0.0298 (r=0.9999) and its lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) was 0.10 μg/mL; the regression equation of N-desmethyl imatinib was Y2=0.4757X2-0.0088 (r=0.9997) and its LLOQ was 0.01 μg/mL. Both intraday and interday precisions were all less than 4.90% for imatinib and 6.26% for N-desmethyl imatinib. The method showed that the relative recoveries of imatinib and N-desmethyl imatinib were all more than 94%, whilst the absolute recoveries were all more than 76%. Blood samples at room temperature and in freezed condition showed good stability. So the method could be well applied for determinations of imatinib and N-desmethyl imatinib in rat plasma.


## 3.2. Effects of Long-Term 165 mg/kg Apigenin on Imatinib and N-Desmethyl Imatinib

The experiment results of pharmacokinetic parameters revealed that the data ofAUC(0-t), AUC(0-∞), Tmax, Vz/F, and CLz/F had a significant difference between group A and group B (P<0.05) (Figure 3, Table 1). To be specific, the figures of AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-∞) in group B were 24.8% and 24.4% lower than those in group A, respectively, while the values of Vz/F and CLz/F in group B increased by 100.1% and 31.3%. On the contrary, the main pharmacokinetic parameters of N-desmethyl imatinib had no great differences between the two groups.Table 1
The main pharmacokinetic parameters of imatinib in four groups (n=5).
Parameters
A
B
C
D
AU
C
(
0
–
t
) (mg·h·L−1)
90.618
±
11.34
68.158
±
7.279
*
126.678
±
12.499
*
,
*
*
113.095
±
8.918
*
,
*
*
AU
C
(
0
–
∞
) (mg·h·L−1)
90.988
±
11.585
68.805
±
7.432
*
127.514
±
12.332
*
,
*
*
114.502
±
8.634
*
,
*
*
MR
T
(
0
–
t
) (h)
5.718
±
0.274
5.479
±
0.512
6.121
±
0.33
*
*
6.049
±
0.351
*
*
MR
T
(
0
–
∞
) (h)
5.804
±
0.376
5.707
±
0.579
6.274
±
0.337
*
*
6.337
±
0.532
*
*
t
(
1
/
2
)
z
(h)
2.304
±
0.954
3.423
±
1.361
2.82
±
1.069
3.456
±
0.418
T
max (h)
3
.
0
±
1
.
003
2
.
0
±
0
.
004
*
3.8
±
0.447
*
*
3.6
±
0.548
*
*
V
z
/
F
(kg·L−1)
1.081
±
0.372
2.163
±
0.875
*
0.971
±
0.396
*
*
1.315
±
0.209
*
*
CL
z
/
F
(L·min−1·kg−1)
0.335
±
0.051
0.44
±
0.05
*
0.237
±
0.023
*
,
*
*
0.263
±
0.019
*
,
*
*
C
max (mg·L−1)
12.074
±
2.023
10.544
±
0.931
15.583
±
0.86
*
,
*
*
14.388
±
1.753
*
,
*
*
*
P < 0.05 in comparison to group A; **P < 0.05 in comparison to group B.Figure 3
Mean concentration-time curve of imatinib in four groups (n=5).


## 3.3. Effects of Short-Term 165 mg/kg Apigenin on Imatinib and N-Desmethyl Imatinib

The main pharmacokinetic parameters of imatinib such asAUC(0-t), AUC(0-∞), CLz/F, and Cmax were significantly distinct between group C and group A (P<0.05) (Figure 3, Table 1). Specifically, the values of AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-∞) in group C were 39.8% and 40.1% higher than those of group A, respectively. Concerned with Vz/F, CLz/F, and Cmax, pharmacokinetic parameters diminished by 10.2%, 29.3%, and 29.1%, respectively; as to t(1/2)z, the magnitude of effect was modest in group C.Referred to the main pharmacokinetic parameters of imatinib, such asAUC(0-t), AUC(0-∞), MRT(0-t), MRT(0-∞), Tmax, Vz/F, CLz/F, and Cmax, the results vary a lot between group B and group C (P<0.05) (Figure 3, Table 1). To be specific, the figures of AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-∞) in group C were approximately 85% higher than the two indexes in group B. While the values of Vz/F and CLz/F in group B both dropped a bit more decreased by 55.1% and 46.1%, respectively.In comparison with group B, theAUC(0-t) and Cmax of N-desmethyl imatinib increased by 19.7% and 19.3%, respectively (Figure 4, Table 2).Table 2
The main pharmacokinetic parameters of N-desmethyl imatinib in four groups (n=5).
Parameters
A
B
C
D
AU
C
(
0
–
t
) (mg·h·L−1)
5.977
±
1.626
6.335
±
1.105
4.797
±
0.602
*
*
5.262
±
0.89
AU
C
(
0
–
∞
) (mg·h·L−1)
6.827
±
2.595
6.672
±
0.797
5.05
±
0.797
5.545
±
0.814
MR
T
(
0
–
t
) (h)
7.085
±
1.135
6.573
±
0.544
7.227
±
0.525
7.326
±
0.53
MR
T
(
0
–
∞
) (h)
9.718
±
4.636
7.504
±
0.189
8.397
±
1.545
8.679
±
1.301
t
(
1
/
2
)
z
(h)
5.495
±
3.92
4.083
±
0.436
4.906
±
2.093
5.376
±
1.495
T
max (h)
3.6
±
0.894
4
.
0
±
0
.
003
4
.
0
±
0
.
005
3.8
±
0.447
V
z
/
F
(kg·L−1)
32.802
±
10.255
26.843
±
4.486
40.738
±
12.777
43.512
±
16.116
*
*
CL
z
/
F
(L·min−1·kg−1)
4.913
±
1.782
4.552
±
0.592
6.066
±
0.992
5.507
±
0.834
C
max (mg·L−1)
0.678
±
0.147
0.797
±
0.073
0.547
±
0.091
*
*
0.639
±
0.13
*
*
*
P < 0.05 in comparison to group A; **P < 0.05 in comparison to group B.Figure 4
Mean concentration-time curve of N-desmethyl imatinib in four groups (n=5).


## 3.4. Effects of Short-Term 252 mg/kg Apigenin on Imatinib and N-Desmethyl Imatinib

Similar to group C, the parameters of imatinib in group D revealed an enormous difference from group A and group B as well, but not to the extent of that in group C. The details were displayed in Figure3 and Table 1.Compared with group B, theVz/F of N-desmethyl imatinib demonstrated a decrease by 62.10%, and Cmax which reduced by 19.82% had a similar downward trend with Vz/F (Figure 4 and Table 2).


## 4. Discussion

The studies mainly focused on the pharmacokinetic characteristics of imatinib and its metabolite N-desmethyl imatinib, then fitting their pharmacokinetic parameters. Two-compartment model was found to meet the concentration-time curves of imatinib and N-desmethyl imatinib in four groups.The influence of 252 mg/kg short-time apigenin group in imatinib was less than that of 165 mg/kg apigenin group, which indicated that the effect was not dose dependent. This was in good agreement with the findings of the previously published studies [18]. The authors suggested that the main part of the ingested apigenin was either excreted unabsorbed or was rapidly metabolized after absorption. Besides, the imatinib in the long-term group and short-term groups had significant differences related to AUC(0-t), AUC(0-∞), MRT(0-t), MRT(0-∞), Vz/F, CLz/F, and Cmax (P<0.05). As a result, the metabolism of imatinib was inhibited by a single dose of application in vivo, while it was accelerated by a long-term oral administration of apigenin.Natural flavonoids, such as flavone, tangeretin, and nobiletin, could affect the human CYP activities when administered orally [19]. CYP3A exhibited large interindividual variation [20] and represented the largest piece of CYP enzymes expressed in the human liver [21]. Many drug-interaction between herbal medicines and anticarcinogen may contribute to the inhibitory effect on CYP3A4 [22, 23].Imatinib has very good oral absorption, whose oral bioavailability is close to 97% [24]. It had wide tissue distribution as well, which meant that a small change in the binding protein proportion would cause large variances in pharmacology. Imatinib is not only the substrate of CYP3A4, but also the inhibitor of CYP3A4. The plasma concentrations of CYP3A4 substrate, such as simvastatin and pimozide, may be elevated by imatinib [17]. Imatinib could not only affect CYP3A4 but also influence CYP2D6, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 in various degrees [25–27]. The results got from the research supported that imatinib exposure was related to hematologic response; thus an increase in imatinib exposure produced by apigenin is likely to be clinically relevant and may lead to adverse drug reaction.From the analysis, the results also indicated that a single dose administration could reduce the metabolism rate of imatinib, increase bioavailability, and extend the resistance time of prototype drug in vivo. Those changes might be related to a potential interaction between apigenin and CYP enzymes.Given the widespread availability of apigenin, it was important to understand what effects its concomitant use might have on the disposition of imatinib; therefore, the research was carried out as expected.


## 5. Conclusion

In summary, patients taking imatinib should pay attention to the intake of the food with apigenin. The inhibitory effects of single-dose apigenin would result in higher concentrations of imatinib in the short term but lower in the long term exposure. Attention has to be paid on the dose adjustments in order to reduce the adverse reaction of drug interactions when apigenin and imatinib are administrated concurrently. Up to now, there are few reports about the effects of traditional Chinese medicine and food composition on imatinib metabolism. All above results showed preponderance of the evidence for clinical rational use of imatinib, and provided a new perspective for the understanding of apigenin.



---

*Source: 789184-2013-11-28.xml*