# Punctaporonins N–S, New Caryophyllene Sesquiterpenoids fromCytospora sp.

Authors: Yan Li; Qingbin Wang; Xingzhong Liu; Yongsheng Che
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

Six new caryophyllene sesquiterpenoids, punctaporonins N–S (1–6), and three known ones, 6-hydroxypunctaporonins B (7), A (8), and E (9), have been isolated from solid cultures ofCytosporasp. The structures of1–6 were elucidated primarily by NMR spectroscopy. The absolute configuration of1was assigned by X-ray crystallographic analysis of its S-MTPA ester. Compounds2,5, and6 showed modest cytotoxicity against HeLa cells.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Fungi are capable of producing a variety of bioactive secondary metabolites [1]. Since the secondary metabolism of fungi may be influenced by selection pressures exerted by other organisms and the environment in which they reside, those species thriving in unique and competitive niches are especially likely to produce bioactive natural products with diverse and interesting structural features [2, 3]. Based on this consideration and the documented success in finding new bioactive natural products from special types of fungi [4], we initiated chemical studies of the fungi inhabiting either the fruiting body and larvae ofCordyceps sinensis [5–10] or its surface soil [11–13]. As an extension, we also studied those species isolated from the soil samples that were collected on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau at altitudes above 3,200 m, the environment in whichCordyceps sinensis was typically found. During the course of our continuing search for new bioactive natural products from this kind of fungal species, an ascomycetous fungusCytosporasp. was isolated from a soil sample that was collected at Linzhi, Tibet, China. Our initial investigation of this fungus that was fermented in rice medium at 25°C led to the isolation of three antimicrobial caryophyllene-derived meroterpenoids [14, 15] and three cytotoxic caryophyllene sesquiterpenoids [16]. In the current work, the fungus was refermented in the same solid culture medium at 15°C, and the HPLC chromatogram of the crude extract revealed the presence of additional components. Fractionation of an EtOAc extract afforded six new caryophyllene sesquiterpenoids, which we named punctaporonins N–S (1–6), and three known ones, 6-hydroxypunctaporonins B (7), A (8), and E (9) (Figure 1) [17]. Details of the isolation, structure elucidation, and cytotoxicity of these compounds are described herein.Figure 1
Structures of compounds1–9.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. General Experimental Procedures

Optical rotations were measured on a Perkin-Elmer 241 polarimeter, and UV data were recorded on a Shimadzu Biospec-1601 spectrophotometer. IR data were recorded using a Nicolet Magna-IR 750 spectrophotometer.1H and 13C NMR data were acquired with Varian Mercury-400, Varian Mercury-500, and Varian Mercury-600 MHz spectrometers using solvent signals (acetone-d6: δH 2.05/δC 29.8, 206.1; pyridine-d5: δH 7.21, 7.58, 8.73) as references. The HMQC and HMBC experiments were optimized for 145.0 and 8.0 Hz, respectively. ESIMS data and HRESIMS data were obtained using an Agilent Accurate-Mass-Q-TOF LC/MS 6520 instrument equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source. The fragmentor and capillary voltages were kept at 125 and 3500 V, respectively. Nitrogen was supplied as the nebulizing and drying gas (300°C). The flow rate of the drying gas and the pressure of the nebulizer were 10 L/min and 10 psi, respectively. All MS experiments were performed in positive ion mode. Full-scan spectra were acquired over a scan range ofm/z 100–1000 at 1.03 spectra/s. All solvents used were of analytical grade. Column chromatography was performed with silica gel (100–200 or 200–300 mesh, Qingdao Marine Chemical Inc., China) and Sephadex LH-20 (GE, USA). Semipreparative HPLC was performed on an Agilent 1260 G1311C isopump equipped with a G1365D MWD detector and an Agilent Zorbax SB-C18 column (5 μm; 9.40 mm × 250 mm).


### 2.2. Fungal Material and Fermentation

The isolation, identification, and fermentation of the fungusCytospora sp. were the same as those we previously described [14–16], except the incubation temperature was changed to 15°C.


### 2.3. Extraction and Isolation

The fermented material was extracted with EtOAc (4×1.0 L), and the organic solvent was evaporated to dryness under vacuum to afford a crude extract (4.2 g). The extract was fractionated by silica gel VLC using petroleum ether–EtOAc gradient elution. The fraction (100 mg) eluted with 35% EtOAc was separated by Sephadex LH-20 column chromatography (CC) eluting with 1 : 1 CH2Cl2–MeOH. The resulting subfractions were combined and further purified by semipreparative RP HPLC (59% MeOH in H2O for 35 min; 2 mL/min) to afford punctaporonins N (1; 4.5 mg, tR 21.22 min), O (2; 3.5 mg, tR 31.33 min), P (3; 2.0 mg, tR 14.05 min), and R (5; 0.8 mg, tR 24.22 min). The fraction (50 mg) eluted from the silica gel column with 45% EtOAc was purified by RP HPLC (35% CH3CN in H2O for 20 min; 2 mL/min) to afford punctaporonin Q (4; 5.0 mg; tR 16.44 min). The fraction (35 mg) eluted from the silica gel column with 40% EtOAc was purified by RP HPLC (40% CH3CN in H2O for 20 min; 2 mL/min) to afford punctaporonin S (6; 2.0 mg; tR 17.02 min). The fraction (150 mg) eluted from the silica gel column with 50% EtOAc was fractionated again by Sephadex LH-20 CC eluting with 1 : 1 CH2Cl2–MeOH. Purification of the resulting subfractions with different gradients afforded 6-hydroxypunctaporonins B (7; 10.0 mg, tR 23.61 min; 50% MeOH in H2O for 30 min), A (8; 8.4 mg, tR 16.12 min; same gradient as in purification of7), and E (9; 3.5 mg, tR 14.83 min; same gradient as in purification of7).


### 2.4. Identification

Punctaporonin N (
1
). White powder (MeOH); α25D –73 (c 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log⁡ε) 198 (3.40) nm; IR (neat) νmax 3317 (br), 2936, 2870, 1736, 1714, 1463, 1372, 1241, 1095, 1037 cm−1; 1H, 13C NMR, HMBC, and NOESY data see Table 1; (+)–HR–ESI–MSm/z 305.1719 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C16H26O4Na, 305.1723).Table 1
NMR data (400 MHz, Acetone-d6) for punctaporonin N (1).
Position
δ
C, mult.
δ
H (J in Hz)
HMBCa
NOESY
1
140.0, qC
2
39.8, CH
3.39, dd (11.9, 8.2)
1, 3, 5, 11, 12
13
3a
34.0, CH2
2.15, dd (11.9, 9.8)
1, 2, 4, 13, 14
3b
1.49, dd (9.8, 8.2)
2, 4, 5, 13
13
4
41.0, qC
5
82.7, qC
6
71.4, CH
3.86, br d (4.7)
13, 16
7a
42.5, CH2
2.63, dd (16.3, 4.7)
5, 6, 15
7b
1.64, dt (16.3, 2.0)
6, 8, 9, 15
8
78.4, qC
9
141.9, CH
5.70, dt (13.0, 2.0)
7, 10, 11
10
124.5, CH
5.62, d (13.0)
1, 9
11
125.9, CH
5.88, s
1, 2, 9, 12
12b
12a
64.8, CH2
4.19, d (12.0)
1, 11
12b
3.93, d (12.0)
1, 2, 11
11, 13
13
24.6, CH3
1.23, s
3, 4, 5, 14
2, 3b, 6, 12b
14
24.1, CH3
1.07, s
3, 4, 5, 13
OH-5
15
26.0, CH3
1.10, s
7, 8, 9
16
16
48.7, CH3
3.26, s
8
6, 15
OH-5
4.53, br s
14
OH-6
4.67, br s
OH-12
3.14, br s
H
M
B
C
a correlations, optimized for 8 Hz, are from proton(s) stated to the indicated carbon.Punctaporonin O (
2
). Colorless oil (MeOH); α25D –47 (c 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log⁡ε) 202 (3.58) nm; IR (neat) νmax 3263 (br), 2932, 2875, 1713, 1463, 1361, 1181, 1089, 1058, 1029 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data see Table 2; (+)–HR–ESI–MSm/z 305.1721 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C16H26O4Na, 305.1723).Table 2
NMR spectroscopic data for punctaporonins O–Q (2–4) in acetone-d6.
Position
2
3
4
δ
C
a, mult.
δ
H
b (J in Hz)
δ
C
a, mult.
δ
H
b (J in Hz)
δ
C
a, mult.
δ
H
b (J in Hz)
1
55.3, qC
55.6, qC
53.6, qC
2
47.1, CH
2.54, dd (13.0, 8.0)
47.2, CH
2.32, dd (12.8, 7.8)
45.6, CH
2.35, dd (12.5, 7.9)
3a
35.5, CH2
2.02, dd (13.0, 8.0)
35.5, CH2
2.08, dd (12.8, 8.9)
36.3, CH2
2.13, dd (12.5, 9.2)
3b
1.46, t (8.0)
1.52, dd (8.9, 7.8)
1.46, dd (9.2, 7.9)
4
42.8, qC
42.9, qC
42.7, qC
5
80.6, qC
80.4, qC
81.7, qC
6
68.9, CH
4.09, dd (10.0, 5.6)
68.7, CH
4.06, ddd (10.3, 7.9, 5.6)
68.9, CH
4.17, dd (10.0, 5.9)
7a
41.5, CH2
1.86, dd (13.5, 5.6)
41.2, CH2
1.77, dd (14.0, 5.6)
40.3, CH2
1.90, dd (13.5, 5.9)
7b
1.56, dd (13.5, 10.0)
1.62, dd (14.0, 10.3)
1.64, dd (13.5, 10.0)
8
51.0, qC
50.0, qC
50.9, qC
9
97.3, CH
3.60, d (2.0)
89.4, CH
5.11, d (2.5)
86.5, CH
4.07, d (2.5)
10
127.9, CH
5.90, dd (6.0, 2.0)
126.6, CH
5.67, dd (5.9, 2.5)
130.6, CH
5.68, dd (6.0, 2.5)
11
143.4, CH
5.74, d (6.0)
145.3, CH
5.88, d (5.9)
141.2, CH
5.92, d (6.0)
12a
62.2, CH2
3.68, d (11.4)
62.0, CH2
3.73, d (11.2)
65.6, CH2
4.57, d (11.6)
12b
3.40, d (11.4)
3.48, dd (11.2, 8.0)
4.37, d (11.6)
13
23.4, CH3
1.11, s
23.4, CH3
1.19, s
23.3, CH3
1.10, s
14
24.1, CH3
1.08, s
24.0, CH3
1.12, s
23.7, CH3
1.05, s
15
24.6, CH3
1.05, s
24.3, CH3
1.10, s
26.2, CH3
0.84, s
16
57.5, CH3
3.33, s
OH-5
4.82, br s
4.88, s
OH-6
5.39, br s
5.37, d (7.9)
OH-9
3.29, s
OH-12
3.25, br s
3.44, d (8.0)
Ac-9
21.3, CH3
2.03, s
170.4, qC
Ac-12
21.0, CH3
1.93, s
171.0, qC
R
e
c
o
r
d
e
d
a at 100 MHz. Recordedb at 500 MHz.Punctaporonin P (
3
). Colorless oil (MeOH); α25D –71 (c 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log⁡ε) 203 (3.55) nm; IR (neat) νmax 3262 (br), 2958, 2935, 2872, 1735, 1717, 1372, 1240, 1089, 1021 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data see Table 2; (+)–HR–ESI–MSm/z 333.1669 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C17H26O5Na, 333.1672).Punctaporonin Q (
4
). Colorless oil (MeOH); α25D –37 (c 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log⁡ε) 203 (3.60) nm; IR (neat) νmax 3438 (br), 2957, 2936, 1730, 1715, 1381, 1249, 1031 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data see Table 2; (+)–HR–ESI–MSm/z 333.1676 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C17H26O5Na, 333.1672).Punctaporonin R (
5
). Colorless oil (MeOH); α25D –30 (c 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log⁡ε) 200 (3.22) nm; IR (neat) νmax 3256 (br), 2957, 2934, 2869, 1711, 1462, 1365, 1102, 1057, 1031, 984 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data see Table 3; (+)–HR–ESI–MSm/z 305.1717 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C16H26O4Na, 305.1723).Table 3
NMR spectroscopic data for punctaporonins R (5) and S (6) in acetone-d6.
Position
5
6
δ
C
a, mult.
δ
H
b (J in Hz)
δ
C
c, mult.
δ
H
b (J in Hz)
1
51.2, qC
53.6, qC
2
43.8, CH
2.09, t (7.3)
39.2, CH
2.01, ddd (12.4, 7.8, 1.4)
3a
35.8, CH2
2.02, dd (7.3, 5.5)
37.8, CH2
2.37, dd (12.4, 9.2)
3b
1.54, t (5.5)
1.73, dd (9.2, 7.8)
4
42.1, qC
42.2, qC
5
80.2, qC
82.6, qC
6
69.3, CH
3.47, dd (11.3, 7.3)
69.0, CH
3.66, dd (10.2, 5.5)
7a
42.9, CH2
1.71, d (11.3)
42.4, CH2
1.94, dd (12.2, 5.5)
7b
1.86, dd (12.2, 10.2)
8
53.6, qC
48.8, qC
9
149.2, CH
5.85, d (5.8)
150.0, CH
6.01, d (5.7)
10
126.8, CH
5.82, dd (5.8, 2.2)
126.8, CH
5.70, dd (5.7, 2.7)
11
90.9, CH
3.62, d (2.2)
81.3, CH
5.28, d (2.7)
12a
57.3, CH2
3.65, d (11.4)
63.6, CH2
4.88 d (10.2)
12b
4.06, dd (11.4, 7.0)
4.06, dd (10.2, 1.4)
13
23.3, CH3
1.10, s
22.9, CH3
1.14, s
14
24.2, CH3
1.08, s
23.6, CH3
1.10, s
15
27.3, CH3
1.18, s
27.9, CH3
1.11, s
16
60.7, CH3
3.19, s
OH-5
5.29, br s
OH-6
5.18, d (7.3)
3.69, (5.5)
OH-12
3.09, d (7.0)
Ac-11
20.8, CH3
1.93, s
170.1, qC
Ac-12
21.0, CH3
1.95, s
170.9, qC
R
e
c
o
r
d
e
d
a at 150 MHz. Recordedb at 500 MHz. Recordedc at 100 MHz.Punctaporonin S (
6
). Colorless oil (MeOH); α25D –84 (c 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log⁡ε) 202 (3.56) nm; IR (neat) νmax 3486 (br), 2953, 2938, 2871, 1736, 1374, 1252, 1040, 990 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data see Table 3; (+)–HR–ESI–MSm/z 375.1781 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C19H28O6Na, 375.1778).6-Hydroxypunctaporonin B (
7
). 1H, 13C NMR, and the MS data were consistent with literature values [17].6-Hydroxypunctaporonin A (
8
). 1H, 13C NMR, and the MS data were consistent with literature values [17].6-Hydroxypunctaporonin E (
9
). 1H, 13C NMR, and the MS data were consistent with literature values [17].


### 2.5. Preparation of (S)-MTPA Ester (1a)

A sample of1 (2.0 mg, 0.007 mmol) was dissolved in pyridine (2.0 mL) in a 10 mL round-bottomed flask. (R)-MTPA Cl (2.0 μL, 0.011 mmol) were quickly added, and the flask was sealed and all contents were stirred at room temperature for 12 h. The mixture was evaporated to dryness and purified by semipreparative HPLC (90% CH3OH in H2O for 20 min; 2 mL/min) to afford1a (2.2 mg, tR 15.72 min): colorless platelets; 1H NMR (pyridine-d5, 500 MHz)δ 6.16 (1H, s, H-11), 6.00 (1H, d,J = 13 Hz, H-9), 5.75 (1H, d,J = 13 Hz, H-10), 5.55 (1H, d,J = 12 Hz, H-12a), 5.46 (1H, d,J = 12 Hz, H-12b), 4.37 (1H, s, H-6), 3.35 (3H, s, H3-16), 3.09 (1H, d,J = 10 Hz, H-2), 2.34 (1H, t,J = 10 Hz, H-3a), 2.11 (1H, d,J = 16 Hz, H-7a), 1.54 (1H, t,J = 10 Hz, H-3b), 1.35 (1H, d,J = 16 Hz, H-7b), 1.37 (3H, s, H3-13), 1.37 (3H, s, H3-14), 1.18 (3H, s, H3-15).


### 2.6. X-Ray Crystallographic Analysis of1a [18]

Upon crystallization from MeOH/H2O (10 : 1) using the vapor diffusion method, colorless crystals were obtained for1a, and a crystal (0.90×0.27×0.08 mm3) was separated from the sample and mounted on a glass fiber, and data were collected using a Rigaku Saturn CCD area detector with graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation, λ=0.71073 Ǻ at 173(2) K. Crystal data: C26H33F3O6·H2O, M=516.54, space group orthorhombic,P212121; unit cell dimensions a=6.9639 (14) Å, b=17.211 (3) Å, c=21.948 (5) Å, V=2630.5 (9) Å3, Z=4, Dcalcd=1.304 mg/m3,μ = 0.107 mm−1, F(000)=1096. The structure was solved by direct methods using SHELXL-2016 [19] and refined using full-matrix least-squares difference Fourier techniques. All nonhydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters, and all hydrogen atoms were placed in idealized positions and refined as riding atoms with the relative isotropic parameters. Absorption corrections were applied with the Siemens Area Detector Absorption Program (SADABS) [20]. The 14274 measurements yielded 4799 independent reflections after equivalent data were averaged, and Lorentz and polarization corrections were applied. The final refinement gave R1=0.0811 and wR2=0.1232 [I>2σI].


### 2.7. MTS Assay

The MTS assay method was the same as that we previously described [16, 21, 22].


## 2.1. General Experimental Procedures

Optical rotations were measured on a Perkin-Elmer 241 polarimeter, and UV data were recorded on a Shimadzu Biospec-1601 spectrophotometer. IR data were recorded using a Nicolet Magna-IR 750 spectrophotometer.1H and 13C NMR data were acquired with Varian Mercury-400, Varian Mercury-500, and Varian Mercury-600 MHz spectrometers using solvent signals (acetone-d6: δH 2.05/δC 29.8, 206.1; pyridine-d5: δH 7.21, 7.58, 8.73) as references. The HMQC and HMBC experiments were optimized for 145.0 and 8.0 Hz, respectively. ESIMS data and HRESIMS data were obtained using an Agilent Accurate-Mass-Q-TOF LC/MS 6520 instrument equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source. The fragmentor and capillary voltages were kept at 125 and 3500 V, respectively. Nitrogen was supplied as the nebulizing and drying gas (300°C). The flow rate of the drying gas and the pressure of the nebulizer were 10 L/min and 10 psi, respectively. All MS experiments were performed in positive ion mode. Full-scan spectra were acquired over a scan range ofm/z 100–1000 at 1.03 spectra/s. All solvents used were of analytical grade. Column chromatography was performed with silica gel (100–200 or 200–300 mesh, Qingdao Marine Chemical Inc., China) and Sephadex LH-20 (GE, USA). Semipreparative HPLC was performed on an Agilent 1260 G1311C isopump equipped with a G1365D MWD detector and an Agilent Zorbax SB-C18 column (5 μm; 9.40 mm × 250 mm).


## 2.2. Fungal Material and Fermentation

The isolation, identification, and fermentation of the fungusCytospora sp. were the same as those we previously described [14–16], except the incubation temperature was changed to 15°C.


## 2.3. Extraction and Isolation

The fermented material was extracted with EtOAc (4×1.0 L), and the organic solvent was evaporated to dryness under vacuum to afford a crude extract (4.2 g). The extract was fractionated by silica gel VLC using petroleum ether–EtOAc gradient elution. The fraction (100 mg) eluted with 35% EtOAc was separated by Sephadex LH-20 column chromatography (CC) eluting with 1 : 1 CH2Cl2–MeOH. The resulting subfractions were combined and further purified by semipreparative RP HPLC (59% MeOH in H2O for 35 min; 2 mL/min) to afford punctaporonins N (1; 4.5 mg, tR 21.22 min), O (2; 3.5 mg, tR 31.33 min), P (3; 2.0 mg, tR 14.05 min), and R (5; 0.8 mg, tR 24.22 min). The fraction (50 mg) eluted from the silica gel column with 45% EtOAc was purified by RP HPLC (35% CH3CN in H2O for 20 min; 2 mL/min) to afford punctaporonin Q (4; 5.0 mg; tR 16.44 min). The fraction (35 mg) eluted from the silica gel column with 40% EtOAc was purified by RP HPLC (40% CH3CN in H2O for 20 min; 2 mL/min) to afford punctaporonin S (6; 2.0 mg; tR 17.02 min). The fraction (150 mg) eluted from the silica gel column with 50% EtOAc was fractionated again by Sephadex LH-20 CC eluting with 1 : 1 CH2Cl2–MeOH. Purification of the resulting subfractions with different gradients afforded 6-hydroxypunctaporonins B (7; 10.0 mg, tR 23.61 min; 50% MeOH in H2O for 30 min), A (8; 8.4 mg, tR 16.12 min; same gradient as in purification of7), and E (9; 3.5 mg, tR 14.83 min; same gradient as in purification of7).


## 2.4. Identification

Punctaporonin N (
1
). White powder (MeOH); α25D –73 (c 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log⁡ε) 198 (3.40) nm; IR (neat) νmax 3317 (br), 2936, 2870, 1736, 1714, 1463, 1372, 1241, 1095, 1037 cm−1; 1H, 13C NMR, HMBC, and NOESY data see Table 1; (+)–HR–ESI–MSm/z 305.1719 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C16H26O4Na, 305.1723).Table 1
NMR data (400 MHz, Acetone-d6) for punctaporonin N (1).
Position
δ
C, mult.
δ
H (J in Hz)
HMBCa
NOESY
1
140.0, qC
2
39.8, CH
3.39, dd (11.9, 8.2)
1, 3, 5, 11, 12
13
3a
34.0, CH2
2.15, dd (11.9, 9.8)
1, 2, 4, 13, 14
3b
1.49, dd (9.8, 8.2)
2, 4, 5, 13
13
4
41.0, qC
5
82.7, qC
6
71.4, CH
3.86, br d (4.7)
13, 16
7a
42.5, CH2
2.63, dd (16.3, 4.7)
5, 6, 15
7b
1.64, dt (16.3, 2.0)
6, 8, 9, 15
8
78.4, qC
9
141.9, CH
5.70, dt (13.0, 2.0)
7, 10, 11
10
124.5, CH
5.62, d (13.0)
1, 9
11
125.9, CH
5.88, s
1, 2, 9, 12
12b
12a
64.8, CH2
4.19, d (12.0)
1, 11
12b
3.93, d (12.0)
1, 2, 11
11, 13
13
24.6, CH3
1.23, s
3, 4, 5, 14
2, 3b, 6, 12b
14
24.1, CH3
1.07, s
3, 4, 5, 13
OH-5
15
26.0, CH3
1.10, s
7, 8, 9
16
16
48.7, CH3
3.26, s
8
6, 15
OH-5
4.53, br s
14
OH-6
4.67, br s
OH-12
3.14, br s
H
M
B
C
a correlations, optimized for 8 Hz, are from proton(s) stated to the indicated carbon.Punctaporonin O (
2
). Colorless oil (MeOH); α25D –47 (c 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log⁡ε) 202 (3.58) nm; IR (neat) νmax 3263 (br), 2932, 2875, 1713, 1463, 1361, 1181, 1089, 1058, 1029 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data see Table 2; (+)–HR–ESI–MSm/z 305.1721 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C16H26O4Na, 305.1723).Table 2
NMR spectroscopic data for punctaporonins O–Q (2–4) in acetone-d6.
Position
2
3
4
δ
C
a, mult.
δ
H
b (J in Hz)
δ
C
a, mult.
δ
H
b (J in Hz)
δ
C
a, mult.
δ
H
b (J in Hz)
1
55.3, qC
55.6, qC
53.6, qC
2
47.1, CH
2.54, dd (13.0, 8.0)
47.2, CH
2.32, dd (12.8, 7.8)
45.6, CH
2.35, dd (12.5, 7.9)
3a
35.5, CH2
2.02, dd (13.0, 8.0)
35.5, CH2
2.08, dd (12.8, 8.9)
36.3, CH2
2.13, dd (12.5, 9.2)
3b
1.46, t (8.0)
1.52, dd (8.9, 7.8)
1.46, dd (9.2, 7.9)
4
42.8, qC
42.9, qC
42.7, qC
5
80.6, qC
80.4, qC
81.7, qC
6
68.9, CH
4.09, dd (10.0, 5.6)
68.7, CH
4.06, ddd (10.3, 7.9, 5.6)
68.9, CH
4.17, dd (10.0, 5.9)
7a
41.5, CH2
1.86, dd (13.5, 5.6)
41.2, CH2
1.77, dd (14.0, 5.6)
40.3, CH2
1.90, dd (13.5, 5.9)
7b
1.56, dd (13.5, 10.0)
1.62, dd (14.0, 10.3)
1.64, dd (13.5, 10.0)
8
51.0, qC
50.0, qC
50.9, qC
9
97.3, CH
3.60, d (2.0)
89.4, CH
5.11, d (2.5)
86.5, CH
4.07, d (2.5)
10
127.9, CH
5.90, dd (6.0, 2.0)
126.6, CH
5.67, dd (5.9, 2.5)
130.6, CH
5.68, dd (6.0, 2.5)
11
143.4, CH
5.74, d (6.0)
145.3, CH
5.88, d (5.9)
141.2, CH
5.92, d (6.0)
12a
62.2, CH2
3.68, d (11.4)
62.0, CH2
3.73, d (11.2)
65.6, CH2
4.57, d (11.6)
12b
3.40, d (11.4)
3.48, dd (11.2, 8.0)
4.37, d (11.6)
13
23.4, CH3
1.11, s
23.4, CH3
1.19, s
23.3, CH3
1.10, s
14
24.1, CH3
1.08, s
24.0, CH3
1.12, s
23.7, CH3
1.05, s
15
24.6, CH3
1.05, s
24.3, CH3
1.10, s
26.2, CH3
0.84, s
16
57.5, CH3
3.33, s
OH-5
4.82, br s
4.88, s
OH-6
5.39, br s
5.37, d (7.9)
OH-9
3.29, s
OH-12
3.25, br s
3.44, d (8.0)
Ac-9
21.3, CH3
2.03, s
170.4, qC
Ac-12
21.0, CH3
1.93, s
171.0, qC
R
e
c
o
r
d
e
d
a at 100 MHz. Recordedb at 500 MHz.Punctaporonin P (
3
). Colorless oil (MeOH); α25D –71 (c 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log⁡ε) 203 (3.55) nm; IR (neat) νmax 3262 (br), 2958, 2935, 2872, 1735, 1717, 1372, 1240, 1089, 1021 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data see Table 2; (+)–HR–ESI–MSm/z 333.1669 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C17H26O5Na, 333.1672).Punctaporonin Q (
4
). Colorless oil (MeOH); α25D –37 (c 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log⁡ε) 203 (3.60) nm; IR (neat) νmax 3438 (br), 2957, 2936, 1730, 1715, 1381, 1249, 1031 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data see Table 2; (+)–HR–ESI–MSm/z 333.1676 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C17H26O5Na, 333.1672).Punctaporonin R (
5
). Colorless oil (MeOH); α25D –30 (c 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log⁡ε) 200 (3.22) nm; IR (neat) νmax 3256 (br), 2957, 2934, 2869, 1711, 1462, 1365, 1102, 1057, 1031, 984 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data see Table 3; (+)–HR–ESI–MSm/z 305.1717 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C16H26O4Na, 305.1723).Table 3
NMR spectroscopic data for punctaporonins R (5) and S (6) in acetone-d6.
Position
5
6
δ
C
a, mult.
δ
H
b (J in Hz)
δ
C
c, mult.
δ
H
b (J in Hz)
1
51.2, qC
53.6, qC
2
43.8, CH
2.09, t (7.3)
39.2, CH
2.01, ddd (12.4, 7.8, 1.4)
3a
35.8, CH2
2.02, dd (7.3, 5.5)
37.8, CH2
2.37, dd (12.4, 9.2)
3b
1.54, t (5.5)
1.73, dd (9.2, 7.8)
4
42.1, qC
42.2, qC
5
80.2, qC
82.6, qC
6
69.3, CH
3.47, dd (11.3, 7.3)
69.0, CH
3.66, dd (10.2, 5.5)
7a
42.9, CH2
1.71, d (11.3)
42.4, CH2
1.94, dd (12.2, 5.5)
7b
1.86, dd (12.2, 10.2)
8
53.6, qC
48.8, qC
9
149.2, CH
5.85, d (5.8)
150.0, CH
6.01, d (5.7)
10
126.8, CH
5.82, dd (5.8, 2.2)
126.8, CH
5.70, dd (5.7, 2.7)
11
90.9, CH
3.62, d (2.2)
81.3, CH
5.28, d (2.7)
12a
57.3, CH2
3.65, d (11.4)
63.6, CH2
4.88 d (10.2)
12b
4.06, dd (11.4, 7.0)
4.06, dd (10.2, 1.4)
13
23.3, CH3
1.10, s
22.9, CH3
1.14, s
14
24.2, CH3
1.08, s
23.6, CH3
1.10, s
15
27.3, CH3
1.18, s
27.9, CH3
1.11, s
16
60.7, CH3
3.19, s
OH-5
5.29, br s
OH-6
5.18, d (7.3)
3.69, (5.5)
OH-12
3.09, d (7.0)
Ac-11
20.8, CH3
1.93, s
170.1, qC
Ac-12
21.0, CH3
1.95, s
170.9, qC
R
e
c
o
r
d
e
d
a at 150 MHz. Recordedb at 500 MHz. Recordedc at 100 MHz.Punctaporonin S (
6
). Colorless oil (MeOH); α25D –84 (c 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log⁡ε) 202 (3.56) nm; IR (neat) νmax 3486 (br), 2953, 2938, 2871, 1736, 1374, 1252, 1040, 990 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data see Table 3; (+)–HR–ESI–MSm/z 375.1781 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C19H28O6Na, 375.1778).6-Hydroxypunctaporonin B (
7
). 1H, 13C NMR, and the MS data were consistent with literature values [17].6-Hydroxypunctaporonin A (
8
). 1H, 13C NMR, and the MS data were consistent with literature values [17].6-Hydroxypunctaporonin E (
9
). 1H, 13C NMR, and the MS data were consistent with literature values [17].


## 2.5. Preparation of (S)-MTPA Ester (1a)

A sample of1 (2.0 mg, 0.007 mmol) was dissolved in pyridine (2.0 mL) in a 10 mL round-bottomed flask. (R)-MTPA Cl (2.0 μL, 0.011 mmol) were quickly added, and the flask was sealed and all contents were stirred at room temperature for 12 h. The mixture was evaporated to dryness and purified by semipreparative HPLC (90% CH3OH in H2O for 20 min; 2 mL/min) to afford1a (2.2 mg, tR 15.72 min): colorless platelets; 1H NMR (pyridine-d5, 500 MHz)δ 6.16 (1H, s, H-11), 6.00 (1H, d,J = 13 Hz, H-9), 5.75 (1H, d,J = 13 Hz, H-10), 5.55 (1H, d,J = 12 Hz, H-12a), 5.46 (1H, d,J = 12 Hz, H-12b), 4.37 (1H, s, H-6), 3.35 (3H, s, H3-16), 3.09 (1H, d,J = 10 Hz, H-2), 2.34 (1H, t,J = 10 Hz, H-3a), 2.11 (1H, d,J = 16 Hz, H-7a), 1.54 (1H, t,J = 10 Hz, H-3b), 1.35 (1H, d,J = 16 Hz, H-7b), 1.37 (3H, s, H3-13), 1.37 (3H, s, H3-14), 1.18 (3H, s, H3-15).


## 2.6. X-Ray Crystallographic Analysis of1a [18]

Upon crystallization from MeOH/H2O (10 : 1) using the vapor diffusion method, colorless crystals were obtained for1a, and a crystal (0.90×0.27×0.08 mm3) was separated from the sample and mounted on a glass fiber, and data were collected using a Rigaku Saturn CCD area detector with graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation, λ=0.71073 Ǻ at 173(2) K. Crystal data: C26H33F3O6·H2O, M=516.54, space group orthorhombic,P212121; unit cell dimensions a=6.9639 (14) Å, b=17.211 (3) Å, c=21.948 (5) Å, V=2630.5 (9) Å3, Z=4, Dcalcd=1.304 mg/m3,μ = 0.107 mm−1, F(000)=1096. The structure was solved by direct methods using SHELXL-2016 [19] and refined using full-matrix least-squares difference Fourier techniques. All nonhydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters, and all hydrogen atoms were placed in idealized positions and refined as riding atoms with the relative isotropic parameters. Absorption corrections were applied with the Siemens Area Detector Absorption Program (SADABS) [20]. The 14274 measurements yielded 4799 independent reflections after equivalent data were averaged, and Lorentz and polarization corrections were applied. The final refinement gave R1=0.0811 and wR2=0.1232 [I>2σI].


## 2.7. MTS Assay

The MTS assay method was the same as that we previously described [16, 21, 22].


## 3. Results and Discussion

Punctaporonin N (1) was obtained as a white powder with a molecular formula of C16H26O4 (four degrees of unsaturation), established by HRESIMS. Analysis of its NMR spectroscopic data (Table 1) revealed structural similarity to the coisolated known compound 6-hydroxypunctaporonin B (7) [17], except for the presence of an O-methyl group (δH/δC 3.26/48.7) attached to C-8, rather than a free hydroxy group as found in7. This observation was supported by an HMBC correlation from the O-methyl proton signal (H3-16) to the oxygenated sp3 quaternary carbon at 78.4 ppm (C-8). Therefore,1 was proposed as the C-8 methyl ether of7.The relative configuration of1 was determined by analysis of the 1H–1H coupling constants and NOESY data (Figure 2). The coupling constant of 13.0 Hz between H-9 and H-10, which was exactly the same as in 7, suggested the Z-geometry for the C-9/C-10 olefin [17]. The C-1/C-11 olefin was deduced to be E-configuration based on NOESY correlation of H-11 with H-12b. NOESY correlations of H3-13 with H-2, H-3b, and H-6 and H-6 with H3-16 indicated that these protons are all on the same face of the ring system, whereas that of H3-14 with OH-5 was used to place them on the opposite face, thereby establishing the relative configuration of1.Figure 2
Key NOESY correlations for punctaporonin N (1).The modified Mosher method was tried to apply assigning the C-6 absolute configuration of1. However, treatment of1 with (R) or (S)-MTPA Cl to form the C-6 MTPA ester was unsuccessful; instead the reaction products C-12 S-MTPA ester (1a) and C-12 R- MTPA ester (1b) were generated. In order to establish the absolute configuration of1, one of the reaction products C-12 S-MTPA ester (1a) was purified by HPLC to obtain a single crystal, and its perspective ORTEP plot is shown in Figure 3. Although the X-ray diffraction was collected by Mo Kα radiation, which only gave the relative configuration for1a, the absolute configuration of the chiral center at C-18 generated from (R)-MTPA Cl had been assigned to be S. Therefore, the absolute configuration of1 was established as 2R, 5S, 6S, and 8S by single-crystal X-ray crystallographic analysis of its C-12 S-MTPA ester (1a).Figure 3
Thermal ellipsoid representation of1a.Punctaporonin O (2) was assigned the same molecular formula C16H26O4 as1 by HRESIMS. Its NMR data (Table 2) were nearly identical to those of the coisolated known compound 6-hydroxypunctaporonin A (8) [17], except that the exchangeable proton at 4.18 ppm (OH-9) was replaced by a methyl group (δH/δC 3.33/57.5). An HMBC correlation from the O-methyl proton signal (H3-16) to the oxymethine carbon at 97.3 ppm (C-9) suggested that2 is the C-9 methyl ether of8. The absolute configuration of2 was proposed as shown by analogy to8, which was also supported by the nearly identical specific rotation values recorded for both compounds [17].The molecular formula of punctaporonin P (3) was determined to be C17H26O5 (five degrees of unsaturation) by HRESIMS, which is 28 mass units more than that of2, corresponding to an extra carbonyl group. The NMR data of3 (Table 2) were similar to those of2, except that the oxymethine proton at 3.60 ppm (H-9) was significantly downfield to 5.11 ppm in3. In addition, the O-methyl group attached to C-9 was replaced by an acetyl unit (δH/δC 2.03/21.3, 170.4), indicating that the C-9 oxygen of3 was acetylated. An HMBC correlation from the downfield oxymethine proton (H-9) to the carboxylic carbon at 170.4 ppm indicated that3 is the C-9 monoacetate of8, with its configuration similarly deduced by analogy to compounds1 and2.Punctaporonin Q (4) gave a pseudomolecular ion [M + Na]+ peak by HRESIMS, consistent with the molecular formula C17H26O5 (five degrees of unsaturation), which is the same as3. Its NMR spectra showed resonances similar to those of3, indicating that4 is also a monoacetate of8, but with a different position for acetylation. Specifically, the 1H NMR chemical shifts of H2-12 in4 (δH 4.37 and 4.57, Table 2) were significantly downfield compared to those in3 (δH 3.48 and 3.73), suggesting that OH-12 was acetylated. The observation was supported by an HMBC correlation from H2-12 to the carboxylic carbon of the acetyl unit (δC 171.0).The elemental composition of punctaporonin R (5) was established as C16H26O4 (four degrees of unsaturation) by HRESIMS, which has one more CH2 unit than another coisolated known compound, 6-hydroxypunctaporonin E (9) [17]. Comparison of the NMR data of5 (Table 3) and9 readily identified5 as the C-11 methyl ether (δH/δC 3.19/60.7) of the latter and having the same configuration as its precedent.Punctaporonin S (6) was assigned the molecular formula C19H28O6 (six degrees of unsaturation) by HRESIMS. Its NMR spectra showed structural characteristics similar to those of5, but the 1H NMR chemical shifts of H-11 (δH 5.70) and H2-12 (δH 4.06 and 4.88) were significantly downfield compared to5 (H-11: δH 3.62; H2-12: δH 3.65 and 4.06), indicating that both OH-11 and OH-12 are acetylated, which were supported by relevant HMBC correlations. Therefore,6 was assigned as the diacetate of the known compound9, with its configuration deduced as shown.To verify that the new metabolites1–6 are authentic natural products, a portion of the freeze-dried fermented rice substrate was extracted with distilled, HPLC grade acetone, and the resulting extract was subjected to RP HPLC analysis using distilled, HPLC grade H2O and MeOH as solvents. Compounds1–6were identified on the HPLC chromatogram of the crude extract by comparison of their retention times with the pure compounds, indicating that1–6 are indeed naturally occurring metabolites.Compounds2,5, and6 showed modest cytotoxicity against HeLa (cervical epithelium) cells, showing IC50 values of 16.6, 10.4, and 47.4 µM, respectively, while the positive control cisplatin showed an IC50 value of 7.6 µM. The remaining compounds did not show noticeable cytotoxic effects against HeLa cells (IC50 > 100 µM).


## 4. Conclusion

In summary, six new caryophyllene sesquiterpenoids, punctaporonins N–S (1–6), and three known ones, 6-hydroxypunctaporonins B (7), A (8), and E (9), have been isolated from solid cultures ofCytosporasp. The structures of1–6 were elucidated primarily by NMR spectroscopy. The absolute configuration of1was assigned by X-ray crystallographic analysis of itsS-MTPA ester. Compounds2,5, and6 showed modest cytotoxicity against HeLa cells. These results implied that the fungi isolated from those unique and competitive niches could prove to be valuable sources of new bioactive natural products.



---

*Source: 7871459-2017-10-24.xml*