# Atmospheric Water Monitoring by Using Ground-Based GPS during Heavy Rains Produced by TPV and SWV

Authors: Guoping Li; Jia Deng
Journal: Advances in Meteorology
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

The time series of precipitable water (PW) in 30 min intervals has been determined through experimentation and operational application of a ground-based global positioning system (GPS) network in Chengdu Plain, which is used for precise and reliable meteorological research. This study is the first to apply PW to the southwest vortex (SWV) and heavy rain events by using the data from an intensive SWV experiment conducted in summer 2010. The PW derived from the local ground-based GPS network was used in the monitoring and analysis of heavy rain caused by the SWV and the Tibetan Plateau vortex (TPV). Results indicate that an increase in GPS precipitable water (GPS-PW) occurs prior to the development of the TPV and SWV; rainfall occurs mainly during high levels of GPS-PW. The evolution features of GPS-PW in rainfall process caused by different weather systems over the Tibetan Plateau (TP) also differ. These results indicate the reference values for operational applications of GPS-PW data in short-term forecasting and nowcasting of high-impact weather in addition to further investigation of heavy rain caused by the TPV, SWV, and other severe weather systems over the TP.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Atmospheric water is a key factor in precipitation forecasting. The spatial and temporal distribution of this water and the latent heat generated by its phase transition play important roles in atmospheric water transport, energy conversion, and the evolution of weather by affecting atmospheric stability and the structure and changes of weather systems. Such factors are important in the formation of heavy rainfall events including vortices and storms.The three states of water liquid, solid, and gas influence global positioning system (GPS) signals, which are used to determine the total atmospheric water content. Technology developed in the 1990s that uses GPS precipitable water (GPS-PW) to detect the atmospheric water content has high potential and practical value [1]. This method is used to determine water data for an entire day with high precision and temporal resolution, which is not possible by using conventional meteorological observations. Thus, the GPS-PW method is a practical improvement in the monitoring and forecasting capability of water vapor and precipitation [2, 3].In recent years, local meteorological agencies in China, in conjunction with the departments of astronomy, earthquakes, surveying and mapping, investigation, and design, have developed numerous ground-based GPS meteorological networks based on various GPS meteorology and GPS-PW methods for data observation and weather forecasting [4–9].Li et al. [10] were the first researchers to use GPS for remote sensing of atmospheric water in China. Sato and Kimura [11] studied the relationship between GPS-PW and convective rainfall. Okamura and Kimura [12] revealed the existence of GPS-PW variation after a cold front in the Kanto Plain, Japan. Liou and Huang [13] used GPS-PW data to analyze the weather processes affected by a passing typhoon. Ha et al. [14] compared GPS water observations with model simulations during the passage of a squall line. Most of these GPS-PW evolution studies determined that a high water value is necessary for producing precipitation. However, different processes of precipitation vary in the amplitude of the extreme value and the duration of GPS-PW. In addition to the aforementioned applications, GPS-PW data analysis has been applied to such processes as local convective rainfall [15], fronts [12, 16–21], lightning [22, 23], thunderstorms [24], thermally induced local circulation [25–27], fog [28], snowfall [12], monsoons [29, 30], and other atmospheric wet phenomena [31]. All of these studies demonstrated the importance and the broad application prospects of GPS-PW remote sensing technology in the fields of weather forecasting and climate analysis. However, few studies thus far have used GPS-PW data to analyze heavy precipitation caused by the southwest vortex (SWV) and the Tibetan Plateau vortex (TPV), which is also known as the plateau vortex.Meso-α-scale low-level vortices that form near the Tibetan Plateau (TP) are among the most important rain-producing systems in China during the warm season. Several often migrate eastward from southwestern China to East China and develop into severe weather systems that cause flooding along their paths. Such vortex systems include the TPV, which forms primarily at 500 hPa on the TP, and the SWV, which forms primarily at 700 hPa at the eastern flanks of the TP and the Sichuan Basin. The latter system was named as such by Chinese meteorologists because the vortices are located in southwestern China [32–35]. TPV and SWV research has previously focused on such factors as weather conditions, circulation, climate statistics, kinetic energy mechanism, diagnostic calculation, and numerical simulation [36, 37]. Although it has since been determined that atmospheric water plays an important role in the formation and development of these vortices and their accompanying rainstorms [38, 39], GPS data has not been used thus far to reveal water variation in the development processes of the SWV. Therefore, the present study assumes the important task of using GPS remote sensing to reflect spatial and temporal variations of atmospheric water. The processes of heavy rain caused by the TPV and SWV occurring in September 2007, July 2008, and July 2010 in Chengdu Plain, southwestern China (Figure 1(a)), are comprehensively analyzed by using data from the GPS network in Chengdu Plain, located at the center of Sichuan Basin, combined with conventional meteorological observation data. Particular attention is given to the relationship between GPS-PW and the development of main influencing systems. This study is expected to provide new insight on the TPV, SWV, and related heavy rain events by establishing a new analytical technique for operational forecasting of vortex rainstorms.(a) Geographical map of China. The small black dot represents Chengdu, and the shaded region represents the Tibetan Plateau with an altitude greater than 3000 m. (b) Distribution of the GPS observation network in Chengdu Plain. Numbers in parentheses represent altitude.
(a)
(b)


## 2. Principle, Methods, and Data

The ground-based GPS observation network in Chengdu Plain, developed by the Surveying and Mapping Institute of Chengdu and the Meteorological Bureau of Chengdu, incorporates NetRS GPS receivers (Trimble, United States). The Meteorology Bureau of Chengdu has contracted the Huayun Company of China to build an automatic weather station (AWS) at the same site. The surface air pressure, surface air temperature, and precipitation were measured at the same AWS locations in which GPS observations were conducted. Enabled in September 2007, the ground-based GPS network (Figure1(b)) in Chengdu, southwestern China, includes stations in Chengdu (CDKC), Dayi (DAYI), Longquanyi (LOQU), Jintang (JITA), Pujiang (PUJI), and Dujiangyan (DUJY), which are evenly distributed across Chengdu Plain. The longest baseline is from Pujiang to Longquanyi (65 km), and the shortest is from Longquanyi to Chengdu (15.5 km).The zenith total delay (ZTD) was calculated by using Bernese GPS software V4.2 including raw data from the GPS observation network of Chengdu with a time interval of 30 s [40]. The zenith hydrostatic delay (ZHD) was calculated according to the Saastamoinen model [41]. Finally, GPS-PW was computed at 30 min intervals by combining ZHD and meteorological AWS data corresponding to the GPS stations.National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR)1°×1° reanalysis data recorded four times daily in addition to data from conventional meteorological observation and an intensive SWV observation experiment conducted in summer 2010 were adopted in our comprehensive analysis of weather systems and the transfer of atmospheric water. The parameters of NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data used in this study include geopotential height (500 hPa and 700 hPa), wind, temperature, relative humidity, and vertical velocity from 850 hPa to 200 hPa. The parameters of the intensive observation experiment used in this study include intensive radiosonde sounding such as wind, temperature, and relative humidity data recorded at each layer and intensive AWS observation of precipitation.The basic procedure for deriving water from ground-based GPS is as follows: ZTD is first obtained from GPS observation and meteorological data at 30 s intervals. The Saastamoinen model is adapted for estimating ZHD such thatZHD=10-6(k1Rps/gmMd). ZWD is obtained by the following formula: ZWD=ZTD-ZHD. The relationship between ZWD and PW is as follows: PW=Π·ZWD [1], where the conversion coefficient of water is a function of the mean weighted temperature Tm:Π=(106/ρwRv[(k3/Tm)+k2′]). k1, k2′, and k3 are refraction constants tested individually in a laboratory, and Tm is the weighted mean tropospheric temperature. In this paper, local correction of the Bevis empirical formula established by Guo et al. [42] is adopted. Using 40 years of radiosonde sounding data recorded at eight stations in Sichuan and Chongqing, local models of the weighted mean tropospheric temperature are established by using the unitary linear regression method on the local surface and upper-air meteorological measurements. The local model for estimating Tm in Chengdu Plain is Tm=54.5+0.78Ts, where Ts is the surface air temperature. Data from Dujiangyan station was not included is this analysis because its temporary relocation caused discontinuity in time and space data.GPS remote sensing of atmospheric water has been compared with actual measurements at Chengdu by academic studies and by several global institutions for many years. Such research has demonstrated the feasibility of GPS water monitoring technology used in meteorological operations in Chengdu, which represents southwestern China. This new atmospheric sounding technology and its products have been applied in short-term forecasting and nowcasting. Software developed by Meteorological Information Comprehensive Analysis and Process System-China Meteorological Administration (MICAPS-CMA) has been applied to weather forecasting and determination of GPS water, real-time transmission of ground-based GPS observation data, data calculation, resolution of precipitable water, and the graphic display of GPS-PW products. The monitoring of GPS water and its products in weather analysis and forecasting was first conducted by Li et al. [15].


## 3. Weather Applications

### 3.1. GPS-PW Applied to Analysis of Heavy Rain Caused by TPV

#### 3.1.1. Overview of Weather

A low-intensity and long duration rain event affected by the eastward shift of the TPV occurred on September 6–9, 2007, in Sichuan Basin leeward of the TP. The overall circulation was east high and west low on the 500 hPa height field (figure not shown). At 08:00 Beijing Standard Time (BST) on September 6, the TPV was generated in the western TP (34.8°N, 85°E). The ridge of high pressure located at 98°E controlled conditions in the eastern TP. At 02:00 on September 7, the TPV shifted to the eastern TP (35°N, 96°E). At 14:00 on the same day, it moved out of the TP and was reduced to a short-wave trough. This precipitation was caused by the eastward movement of the TPV, which occurred mainly in the western Sichuan Basin. Rainfall recorded at each station exceeded 30 mm; that at Pujiang station reached 92.7 mm.


#### 3.1.2. Relationship between GPS-PW and Rainfall during the Period of TPV

To determine the hourly evolution of atmospheric water during heavy rain events, the relationship between the average value of GPS-PW and the regional average precipitation in the Chengdu area was examined after averaging the GPS-PW of Chengdu, Dayi, Jintang, Pujiang, and Longquanyi. These stations were selected on the basis of geographical location to represent various characteristics of GPS-PW data.As shown in Figure2, the increase and decrease of GPS-PW generally indicate the occurrence and end of rain events. Precipitation was measured by using AWS rain gauges. In this figure, the regional average precipitation and average GPS-PW were determined using values measured at Chengdu, Dayi, Jintang, Pujiang, and Longquanyi stations. Approximately 12 h prior to the rain event, GPS-PW increased from 33.34 mm at 20:00 on September 5 to 47.95 mm at 05:00 on September 6 before slightly decreasing. At 15:30 on September 6, the GPS-PW rose to 56.11 mm as precipitation began. The GPS-PW at that stage was maintained at a relatively stable high value of approximately 50 mm and exhibited a slight fluctuation, whereas rain occurred during the second stage at 8:00 on September 7. At 00:00 on September 8, the average rainy intensity at each station increased by 4.46 mm every 30 min; however, the average value of GPS-PW showed no apparent change. The maximum value of average rainfall was noted prior to or at nearly the same time as the occurrence of the GPS-PW peak value. After 10:00 on September 9, the GPS-PW value decreased rapidly, and the rain event ended.Figure 2
Temporal series of the average value of GPS-PW and regional average precipitation recorded on September 6–9, 2007, in Chengdu Plain. Stations include Chengdu, Dayi, Jintang, Pujiang, and Longquanyi.Although these results indicate that rain generally occurred during the period in which GPS-PW values were high and ended when values were low, such behavior is not definitive. As shown in Figure2, the opposite also can exist. Thus, it is necessary to examine additional TPV periods to draw conclusions that are more realistic.Figure3 shows that high values of GPS-PW were mainly distributed in two periods from noon to nighttime on September 6 and from nighttime on September 7 to the morning of September 8, which corresponds with the two stages of precipitation. Prior to the rainfall, the atmospheric water content in the entire layer increased. Although the GPS-PW value decreased after the first stage of rainfall, it maintained a high level. The water accumulated again, and the second stage of rainfall began when the GPS-PW value reached a new high. In contrast with the diurnal variation of GPS-PW in Chengdu, Pujiang, and Jintang, the diurnal cycle characteristics of GPS-PW in these stations were essentially the same. The values changed significantly during the day and were relatively stable at night during the major period of TPV from September 6 to September 8; however, that at Pujiang station was higher.GPS-PW values recorded by Chengdu, Jintang, and Pujiang on September (a) 6, (b) 7, (c) 8, and (d) 9, 2007.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


#### 3.1.3. Relationship between GPS-PW and Physical Element Fields

As shown in Figure4, Pujiang and Jintang stations, located, respectively, in the southwestern and northeastern Chengdu Plain, recorded contrasting values. Prior to the rainfall at 02:00 on September 6, the water vapor flux was small in the 850 hPa layer, and Chengdu Plain was relatively dry. In the flux field, water vapor transferred from south to north, intersecting in the eastern TP. The water vapor transferred to western Sichuan from the Bay of Bengal, and rain fell from 14:00 to 20:00 on September 6. The water vapor transfer was greater than 5 g · cm−1 · hPa−1 · s−1 in the 700 hPa layer, the high-value area of water vapor transfer expanded, and the GPS-PW increased. At 08:00 on September 8, the water vapor transfer in the 850 hPa layer was greater than 9 g · cm−1 · hPa−1 · s−1 and was thus replenished. Chengdu Plain was relatively wet; the GPS-PW value was maintained at a high level, which was conducive to the reoccurrence of rainfall. The two high-value stages of GPS-PW were relative to the growth of regional water vapor transfer; however, the peak value of GPS-PW occurred earlier than that of the water vapor transfer for approximately 5 h to 7 h.Evolution of water vapor flux recorded in September 6–9, 2007, at (a) Pujiang and (b) Jintang stations (unit: g · cm−1 · hPa−1 · s−1).
(a)
(b)In this process of rainfall, which was caused by eastward movement of the TPV, the water vapor increase was due mainly to the transport and the convergence of water vapor in the lower layer. As shown in Figure5, the vortex center at 34.8°N, 85°E was ascending, and the maximum GPS-PW value (5 × 10−1 hPa · s−1) located in the 400 hPa layer at 08:00 on September 6 was ascending correspondingly. At 02:00, the maximum vertical velocity was located at 500 hPa with the same intensity. At 14:00 on September 7, the vortex began to move eastward, the vertical velocity decreased in the low layer, and the intensity of convergence weakened. The vortex then affected Sichuan Basin and moved out of the TP to form strong convergence over the entire Chengdu Plain (figure not shown). This result indicates that the vertical motion ascended, descended, and ascended from its generation to its movement away from the TP, which corresponds strongly with the increasing-decreasing-increasing variations of the GPS-PW (Figure 3). The GPS-PW began to increase rapidly for approximately 12 h prior to the vortex development before consistently changing with the intensity of the water vapor flux in the vortex center. In this case, a stronger water flux corresponded with a higher GPS-PW value.Profiles of the vertical velocity at the TPV center recorded at various times. (a) 08:00 Beijing standard time on September 6, (b) 02:00 on September 7, and (c) 14:00 on September 7, 2007 (unit: hPa · s−1).
(a)
(b)
(c)


### 3.2. Application of GPS-PW to Analysis of Heavy Rain Caused by SWV

#### 3.2.1. Background of Weather

Because of the low-level jet from Nanhai and the invasion of northern cold air, combined with the long duration of the SWV in Sichuan Basin, heavy rain occurred in the northeastern Sichuan Basin on July 15–18, 2010. This rainfall event was of high intensity and long duration, and the precipitation measured at each station exceeded 20 mm. At Pujiang station, it reached 95.4 mm; the maximum 1 h rainfall was 33.8 mm.


#### 3.2.2. Relationship between GPS-PW and Rainfall during Period of SWV

Changes in the average GPS-PW value recorded at Chengdu, Dayi, Pujiang, and Longquanyi stations clearly show that this rainfall process can be divided into two stages: during the nighttime on July 15 and from nighttime on July 16 to the morning of July 17 (Figure6). Approximately 6 h prior to the rainfall, the GPS-PW began to increase sharply and reached its first maximum value at 15:00 on July 15. The GPS-PW value fluctuated slightly when the rain began. However, the peak of rainfall and that of GPS-PW did not always coincide. When the atmospheric water condensed in the form of rain and fell to the ground, GPS-PW clearly decreased. At 12:00 on July 16, GPS-PW surged again and reached its maximum value of 57.45 mm at 23:00 on July 16. The second stage of rainfall occurred during this GPS-PW surge. The average rainfall was heavier than that recorded during the first stage; however, the peak of rainfall occurred approximately 4 h earlier than that of the GPS-PW. As shown in Figure 7, the GPS-PW recorded at each station reached maximum values at 00:00 on July 17; within 1 h, the maximum rainfall and GPS-PW were consistent with the distribution of the high value of GPS-PW. The peak value of GPS-PW during the second stage was greater than that during the first stage, and greater increases in amplitude of GPS-PW correlated with heavier rainfall. The oscillation change of GPS-PW was clear during this process; the changes in Chengdu and Pujiang stations were nearly the same; and the increase and decrease were largest at Dayi station. These results indicate that the convective instability of this rainfall was remarkable; no distinct diurnal cycle was observed at any station.Figure 6
Temporal series of the average value of GPS-PW and regional average precipitation recorded on July 15–18, 2010, in Chengdu Plain at Chengdu, Dayi, Jintang, Pujiang, and Longquanyi stations.GPS-PW values recorded at Chengdu, Dayi, and Pujiang stations on July (a) 16, (b) 17, and (c) 18, 2010.
(a)
(b)
(c)


#### 3.2.3. Contrast of GPS-PW and Physical Element Fields

Because the radiosonde station in southwestern China is unreliable in calculating the water vapor flux and the reanalysis data reasonably represents the atmospheric water in this region [43], the latter is generally used to evaluate this flux. As shown in Figure 8, Pujiang and Chengdu stations showed high values of water vapor flux from 02:00 to 20:00 on July 17, which coincided with the period of SWV stagnation. With the strengthening of the low-level jet in the southeastern SWV, the maximum value of water vapor flux field (21 g · cm−1 · hPa−1 · s−1) at 700 hPa at Pujiang station appeared at 14:00 on July 17. The peak of GPS-PW occurred approximately 6 h earlier than that of the water vapor flux. Figure 9 shows a profile of the vertical velocity of the center of the TPV at various times along the center of the SWV. At 20:00 on July 16, the SWV began to form. The vertical velocity of the vortex center at 30°N, 101°E ascended below 600 hPa and descended between 600 hPa and 300 hPa layer as the GPS-PW value ascended. At 08:00 on July 17, which was the stagnant period of the vortex, the vertical velocity of the SWV center abruptly ascended from low to high levels, and the convective motion reached its peak. At 20:00, the vortex began to move eastward to Sichuan Basin (31°N, 106°E), and the ascending motion weakened and finally descended. At the same time, the GPS-PW dropped to a low value, which was evident before moving eastward of the vortex. The GPS-PW clearly began to surge approximately 8 h earlier than the vortex development, and the maximum value occurred prior to the peak of the ascending motion of the vortex center. Continuous airflow and water convergence strongly influenced rainfall in the basin.Evolution of water vapor flux recorded on July 15–18, 2010, at (a) Pujiang and (b) Chengdu stations (unit: g · cm−1 · hPa−1 · s−1).
(a)
(b)Profiles of the vertical velocity at the SWV center recorded at various times. (a) 20:00 on July 16, (b) 08:00 on July 17, and (c) 20:00 on July 17, 2010 (unit: hPa · s−1).
(a)
(b)
(c)


### 3.3. Application of GPS-PW in Analysis of Heavy Rain Caused by TPV and SWV

#### 3.3.1. Weather Analysis

A regional rainstorm occurred from west to east in Sichuan Basin on July 20–22, 2008, in which the unevenly distributed rainfall was mainly located in the western basin. The rain was first observed at Chengdu station at 11:30 on July 20 and finally observed at Dayi station at 22:00 on July 21. The main rainfall occurred at noon and during the nighttime on July 20. The interaction of the TPV and SWV triggered the strong development of the southwesterly low-level jet. The rain caused by the TPV was not apparent in the absence of the SWV. However, the SWV was induced with the eastward movement of the TPV. The interaction and development of these two vortices related to TP caused the heavy rain event in a large area of southwestern China.


#### 3.3.2. Relationship between GPS-PW and Rainfall during Periods of TPV and SWV

As shown in Figure10, a high GPS-PW level of 50 mm caused by the TPV formed in the eastern plateau prior to rainfall. At 07:00 on July 20, the GPS-PW increased slowly and reached a high value of 61.8 mm at 13:00 with a rate of increase at 1.2 mm/0.5 h. The rainfall occurred approximately 5 h after this increase. During the eastward movement of the TPV, the GPS-PW decreased slowly, increased again at 17:00, and reached its maximum of 72.1 mm at 21:30 20. At the same time, low-pressure circulation was induced at a low level over the western Sichuan Basin, which developed quickly to form the SWV. Subsequently, the GPS-PW increased with fluctuation and reached a second high value of 71.5 mm at 01:30 on July 21. It should be noted that the peak of the two rainfall processes occurred approximately 1 h before and after that of the GPS-PW. The GPS-PW increased to its high value through the coupling process, during which time the rainfall at the second stage was greater than that during the first. The high value of GPS-PW was distributed from noon to nighttime on July 20 and during the early morning of July 21, as indicated by Figures 10 and 11, which is consistent with the west to east movement of the vortex and its rain. Figure 11 shows that the value of GPS-PW was higher during the nighttime and lower during the day, which indicates that the high value of GPS-PW was necessary for the rainfall to occur.Figure 10
Temporal series of the average value of GPS-PW and regional average precipitation recorded on July 20–22, 2008, in Chengdu Plain at Chengdu, Dayi, Jintang, Pujiang, and Longquanyi stations.GPS-PW values recorded at Chengdu, Dayi, and Pujiang on July (a) 20, (b) July 21, and (c) July 22, 2008.
(a)
(b)
(c)


#### 3.3.3. Comparison of GPS-PW and Physical Element Fields

As shown in Figure12, the water vapor flux at 850 hPa increased slightly from 08:00 to 20:00 on July 20, which was caused by the weak southwestward airflow over the basin during formation of the TPV. During the first stage of rainfall, the peak of GPS-PW occurred approximately 7 h prior to that of the water vapor flux. At 08:00 on July 21, the southwestward wind near the basin strengthened; the SWV and the TPV coupled; and the water vapor flux of the Chengdu Plain reached 8 g · cm−1 · hPa−1 · s−1. At the same time, the second stage of the main rainfall occurred. The peak of GPS-PW occurred earlier than that of the water vapor flux. The water vapor flux then increased continuously and reached its maximum at 700 hPa and 850 hPa at 20:00. The humidity in the basin increased, and the rainfall increased significantly through the influence of the two vortices and the transfer of atmospheric water.Evolution of water vapor flux recorded on July 20–22, 2008, at (a) Pujiang and (b) Chengdu stations (unit: g · cm−1 · hPa−1 · s−1).
(a)
(b)Figure13 shows that at 20:00 on July 20, the vertical velocity of vortex center at 32.5°N, 100.5°E descended below 550 hPa before ascending between 550 hPa and 300 hPa and descending above 300 hPa. At 08:00 on July 21, the vertical motion of the vortex center at 31°N, 105°E was nearly completely opposite to that of the previous movement of descent from 600 hPa to 300 hPa. At that moment, the SWV formed in Sichuan Basin and coupled with the TPV, which strengthened the center of the SWV. At 20:00, it showed strong ascending motion from the low to high layers, and the maximum vertical velocity reached −10 × 10−1 hPa · s−1. The GPS-PW surged approximately 13 h prior to development of the SWV. However, the GPS-PW dropped to the level before the generation of SWV when SWV developed to the strongest. These results demonstrate that the increase of GPS-PW may indicate the development of the vortex for this case. However, additional cases should be tested to obtain definitive results.Profiles of the vertical velocity at the SWV center recorded at various times. (a) 20:00 on July 20, (b) 08:00 on July 21, and (c) 20:00 on July 21 (unit: hPa · s−1).
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.1. GPS-PW Applied to Analysis of Heavy Rain Caused by TPV

### 3.1.1. Overview of Weather

A low-intensity and long duration rain event affected by the eastward shift of the TPV occurred on September 6–9, 2007, in Sichuan Basin leeward of the TP. The overall circulation was east high and west low on the 500 hPa height field (figure not shown). At 08:00 Beijing Standard Time (BST) on September 6, the TPV was generated in the western TP (34.8°N, 85°E). The ridge of high pressure located at 98°E controlled conditions in the eastern TP. At 02:00 on September 7, the TPV shifted to the eastern TP (35°N, 96°E). At 14:00 on the same day, it moved out of the TP and was reduced to a short-wave trough. This precipitation was caused by the eastward movement of the TPV, which occurred mainly in the western Sichuan Basin. Rainfall recorded at each station exceeded 30 mm; that at Pujiang station reached 92.7 mm.


### 3.1.2. Relationship between GPS-PW and Rainfall during the Period of TPV

To determine the hourly evolution of atmospheric water during heavy rain events, the relationship between the average value of GPS-PW and the regional average precipitation in the Chengdu area was examined after averaging the GPS-PW of Chengdu, Dayi, Jintang, Pujiang, and Longquanyi. These stations were selected on the basis of geographical location to represent various characteristics of GPS-PW data.As shown in Figure2, the increase and decrease of GPS-PW generally indicate the occurrence and end of rain events. Precipitation was measured by using AWS rain gauges. In this figure, the regional average precipitation and average GPS-PW were determined using values measured at Chengdu, Dayi, Jintang, Pujiang, and Longquanyi stations. Approximately 12 h prior to the rain event, GPS-PW increased from 33.34 mm at 20:00 on September 5 to 47.95 mm at 05:00 on September 6 before slightly decreasing. At 15:30 on September 6, the GPS-PW rose to 56.11 mm as precipitation began. The GPS-PW at that stage was maintained at a relatively stable high value of approximately 50 mm and exhibited a slight fluctuation, whereas rain occurred during the second stage at 8:00 on September 7. At 00:00 on September 8, the average rainy intensity at each station increased by 4.46 mm every 30 min; however, the average value of GPS-PW showed no apparent change. The maximum value of average rainfall was noted prior to or at nearly the same time as the occurrence of the GPS-PW peak value. After 10:00 on September 9, the GPS-PW value decreased rapidly, and the rain event ended.Figure 2
Temporal series of the average value of GPS-PW and regional average precipitation recorded on September 6–9, 2007, in Chengdu Plain. Stations include Chengdu, Dayi, Jintang, Pujiang, and Longquanyi.Although these results indicate that rain generally occurred during the period in which GPS-PW values were high and ended when values were low, such behavior is not definitive. As shown in Figure2, the opposite also can exist. Thus, it is necessary to examine additional TPV periods to draw conclusions that are more realistic.Figure3 shows that high values of GPS-PW were mainly distributed in two periods from noon to nighttime on September 6 and from nighttime on September 7 to the morning of September 8, which corresponds with the two stages of precipitation. Prior to the rainfall, the atmospheric water content in the entire layer increased. Although the GPS-PW value decreased after the first stage of rainfall, it maintained a high level. The water accumulated again, and the second stage of rainfall began when the GPS-PW value reached a new high. In contrast with the diurnal variation of GPS-PW in Chengdu, Pujiang, and Jintang, the diurnal cycle characteristics of GPS-PW in these stations were essentially the same. The values changed significantly during the day and were relatively stable at night during the major period of TPV from September 6 to September 8; however, that at Pujiang station was higher.GPS-PW values recorded by Chengdu, Jintang, and Pujiang on September (a) 6, (b) 7, (c) 8, and (d) 9, 2007.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


### 3.1.3. Relationship between GPS-PW and Physical Element Fields

As shown in Figure4, Pujiang and Jintang stations, located, respectively, in the southwestern and northeastern Chengdu Plain, recorded contrasting values. Prior to the rainfall at 02:00 on September 6, the water vapor flux was small in the 850 hPa layer, and Chengdu Plain was relatively dry. In the flux field, water vapor transferred from south to north, intersecting in the eastern TP. The water vapor transferred to western Sichuan from the Bay of Bengal, and rain fell from 14:00 to 20:00 on September 6. The water vapor transfer was greater than 5 g · cm−1 · hPa−1 · s−1 in the 700 hPa layer, the high-value area of water vapor transfer expanded, and the GPS-PW increased. At 08:00 on September 8, the water vapor transfer in the 850 hPa layer was greater than 9 g · cm−1 · hPa−1 · s−1 and was thus replenished. Chengdu Plain was relatively wet; the GPS-PW value was maintained at a high level, which was conducive to the reoccurrence of rainfall. The two high-value stages of GPS-PW were relative to the growth of regional water vapor transfer; however, the peak value of GPS-PW occurred earlier than that of the water vapor transfer for approximately 5 h to 7 h.Evolution of water vapor flux recorded in September 6–9, 2007, at (a) Pujiang and (b) Jintang stations (unit: g · cm−1 · hPa−1 · s−1).
(a)
(b)In this process of rainfall, which was caused by eastward movement of the TPV, the water vapor increase was due mainly to the transport and the convergence of water vapor in the lower layer. As shown in Figure5, the vortex center at 34.8°N, 85°E was ascending, and the maximum GPS-PW value (5 × 10−1 hPa · s−1) located in the 400 hPa layer at 08:00 on September 6 was ascending correspondingly. At 02:00, the maximum vertical velocity was located at 500 hPa with the same intensity. At 14:00 on September 7, the vortex began to move eastward, the vertical velocity decreased in the low layer, and the intensity of convergence weakened. The vortex then affected Sichuan Basin and moved out of the TP to form strong convergence over the entire Chengdu Plain (figure not shown). This result indicates that the vertical motion ascended, descended, and ascended from its generation to its movement away from the TP, which corresponds strongly with the increasing-decreasing-increasing variations of the GPS-PW (Figure 3). The GPS-PW began to increase rapidly for approximately 12 h prior to the vortex development before consistently changing with the intensity of the water vapor flux in the vortex center. In this case, a stronger water flux corresponded with a higher GPS-PW value.Profiles of the vertical velocity at the TPV center recorded at various times. (a) 08:00 Beijing standard time on September 6, (b) 02:00 on September 7, and (c) 14:00 on September 7, 2007 (unit: hPa · s−1).
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.1.1. Overview of Weather

A low-intensity and long duration rain event affected by the eastward shift of the TPV occurred on September 6–9, 2007, in Sichuan Basin leeward of the TP. The overall circulation was east high and west low on the 500 hPa height field (figure not shown). At 08:00 Beijing Standard Time (BST) on September 6, the TPV was generated in the western TP (34.8°N, 85°E). The ridge of high pressure located at 98°E controlled conditions in the eastern TP. At 02:00 on September 7, the TPV shifted to the eastern TP (35°N, 96°E). At 14:00 on the same day, it moved out of the TP and was reduced to a short-wave trough. This precipitation was caused by the eastward movement of the TPV, which occurred mainly in the western Sichuan Basin. Rainfall recorded at each station exceeded 30 mm; that at Pujiang station reached 92.7 mm.


## 3.1.2. Relationship between GPS-PW and Rainfall during the Period of TPV

To determine the hourly evolution of atmospheric water during heavy rain events, the relationship between the average value of GPS-PW and the regional average precipitation in the Chengdu area was examined after averaging the GPS-PW of Chengdu, Dayi, Jintang, Pujiang, and Longquanyi. These stations were selected on the basis of geographical location to represent various characteristics of GPS-PW data.As shown in Figure2, the increase and decrease of GPS-PW generally indicate the occurrence and end of rain events. Precipitation was measured by using AWS rain gauges. In this figure, the regional average precipitation and average GPS-PW were determined using values measured at Chengdu, Dayi, Jintang, Pujiang, and Longquanyi stations. Approximately 12 h prior to the rain event, GPS-PW increased from 33.34 mm at 20:00 on September 5 to 47.95 mm at 05:00 on September 6 before slightly decreasing. At 15:30 on September 6, the GPS-PW rose to 56.11 mm as precipitation began. The GPS-PW at that stage was maintained at a relatively stable high value of approximately 50 mm and exhibited a slight fluctuation, whereas rain occurred during the second stage at 8:00 on September 7. At 00:00 on September 8, the average rainy intensity at each station increased by 4.46 mm every 30 min; however, the average value of GPS-PW showed no apparent change. The maximum value of average rainfall was noted prior to or at nearly the same time as the occurrence of the GPS-PW peak value. After 10:00 on September 9, the GPS-PW value decreased rapidly, and the rain event ended.Figure 2
Temporal series of the average value of GPS-PW and regional average precipitation recorded on September 6–9, 2007, in Chengdu Plain. Stations include Chengdu, Dayi, Jintang, Pujiang, and Longquanyi.Although these results indicate that rain generally occurred during the period in which GPS-PW values were high and ended when values were low, such behavior is not definitive. As shown in Figure2, the opposite also can exist. Thus, it is necessary to examine additional TPV periods to draw conclusions that are more realistic.Figure3 shows that high values of GPS-PW were mainly distributed in two periods from noon to nighttime on September 6 and from nighttime on September 7 to the morning of September 8, which corresponds with the two stages of precipitation. Prior to the rainfall, the atmospheric water content in the entire layer increased. Although the GPS-PW value decreased after the first stage of rainfall, it maintained a high level. The water accumulated again, and the second stage of rainfall began when the GPS-PW value reached a new high. In contrast with the diurnal variation of GPS-PW in Chengdu, Pujiang, and Jintang, the diurnal cycle characteristics of GPS-PW in these stations were essentially the same. The values changed significantly during the day and were relatively stable at night during the major period of TPV from September 6 to September 8; however, that at Pujiang station was higher.GPS-PW values recorded by Chengdu, Jintang, and Pujiang on September (a) 6, (b) 7, (c) 8, and (d) 9, 2007.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.1.3. Relationship between GPS-PW and Physical Element Fields

As shown in Figure4, Pujiang and Jintang stations, located, respectively, in the southwestern and northeastern Chengdu Plain, recorded contrasting values. Prior to the rainfall at 02:00 on September 6, the water vapor flux was small in the 850 hPa layer, and Chengdu Plain was relatively dry. In the flux field, water vapor transferred from south to north, intersecting in the eastern TP. The water vapor transferred to western Sichuan from the Bay of Bengal, and rain fell from 14:00 to 20:00 on September 6. The water vapor transfer was greater than 5 g · cm−1 · hPa−1 · s−1 in the 700 hPa layer, the high-value area of water vapor transfer expanded, and the GPS-PW increased. At 08:00 on September 8, the water vapor transfer in the 850 hPa layer was greater than 9 g · cm−1 · hPa−1 · s−1 and was thus replenished. Chengdu Plain was relatively wet; the GPS-PW value was maintained at a high level, which was conducive to the reoccurrence of rainfall. The two high-value stages of GPS-PW were relative to the growth of regional water vapor transfer; however, the peak value of GPS-PW occurred earlier than that of the water vapor transfer for approximately 5 h to 7 h.Evolution of water vapor flux recorded in September 6–9, 2007, at (a) Pujiang and (b) Jintang stations (unit: g · cm−1 · hPa−1 · s−1).
(a)
(b)In this process of rainfall, which was caused by eastward movement of the TPV, the water vapor increase was due mainly to the transport and the convergence of water vapor in the lower layer. As shown in Figure5, the vortex center at 34.8°N, 85°E was ascending, and the maximum GPS-PW value (5 × 10−1 hPa · s−1) located in the 400 hPa layer at 08:00 on September 6 was ascending correspondingly. At 02:00, the maximum vertical velocity was located at 500 hPa with the same intensity. At 14:00 on September 7, the vortex began to move eastward, the vertical velocity decreased in the low layer, and the intensity of convergence weakened. The vortex then affected Sichuan Basin and moved out of the TP to form strong convergence over the entire Chengdu Plain (figure not shown). This result indicates that the vertical motion ascended, descended, and ascended from its generation to its movement away from the TP, which corresponds strongly with the increasing-decreasing-increasing variations of the GPS-PW (Figure 3). The GPS-PW began to increase rapidly for approximately 12 h prior to the vortex development before consistently changing with the intensity of the water vapor flux in the vortex center. In this case, a stronger water flux corresponded with a higher GPS-PW value.Profiles of the vertical velocity at the TPV center recorded at various times. (a) 08:00 Beijing standard time on September 6, (b) 02:00 on September 7, and (c) 14:00 on September 7, 2007 (unit: hPa · s−1).
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.2. Application of GPS-PW to Analysis of Heavy Rain Caused by SWV

### 3.2.1. Background of Weather

Because of the low-level jet from Nanhai and the invasion of northern cold air, combined with the long duration of the SWV in Sichuan Basin, heavy rain occurred in the northeastern Sichuan Basin on July 15–18, 2010. This rainfall event was of high intensity and long duration, and the precipitation measured at each station exceeded 20 mm. At Pujiang station, it reached 95.4 mm; the maximum 1 h rainfall was 33.8 mm.


### 3.2.2. Relationship between GPS-PW and Rainfall during Period of SWV

Changes in the average GPS-PW value recorded at Chengdu, Dayi, Pujiang, and Longquanyi stations clearly show that this rainfall process can be divided into two stages: during the nighttime on July 15 and from nighttime on July 16 to the morning of July 17 (Figure6). Approximately 6 h prior to the rainfall, the GPS-PW began to increase sharply and reached its first maximum value at 15:00 on July 15. The GPS-PW value fluctuated slightly when the rain began. However, the peak of rainfall and that of GPS-PW did not always coincide. When the atmospheric water condensed in the form of rain and fell to the ground, GPS-PW clearly decreased. At 12:00 on July 16, GPS-PW surged again and reached its maximum value of 57.45 mm at 23:00 on July 16. The second stage of rainfall occurred during this GPS-PW surge. The average rainfall was heavier than that recorded during the first stage; however, the peak of rainfall occurred approximately 4 h earlier than that of the GPS-PW. As shown in Figure 7, the GPS-PW recorded at each station reached maximum values at 00:00 on July 17; within 1 h, the maximum rainfall and GPS-PW were consistent with the distribution of the high value of GPS-PW. The peak value of GPS-PW during the second stage was greater than that during the first stage, and greater increases in amplitude of GPS-PW correlated with heavier rainfall. The oscillation change of GPS-PW was clear during this process; the changes in Chengdu and Pujiang stations were nearly the same; and the increase and decrease were largest at Dayi station. These results indicate that the convective instability of this rainfall was remarkable; no distinct diurnal cycle was observed at any station.Figure 6
Temporal series of the average value of GPS-PW and regional average precipitation recorded on July 15–18, 2010, in Chengdu Plain at Chengdu, Dayi, Jintang, Pujiang, and Longquanyi stations.GPS-PW values recorded at Chengdu, Dayi, and Pujiang stations on July (a) 16, (b) 17, and (c) 18, 2010.
(a)
(b)
(c)


### 3.2.3. Contrast of GPS-PW and Physical Element Fields

Because the radiosonde station in southwestern China is unreliable in calculating the water vapor flux and the reanalysis data reasonably represents the atmospheric water in this region [43], the latter is generally used to evaluate this flux. As shown in Figure 8, Pujiang and Chengdu stations showed high values of water vapor flux from 02:00 to 20:00 on July 17, which coincided with the period of SWV stagnation. With the strengthening of the low-level jet in the southeastern SWV, the maximum value of water vapor flux field (21 g · cm−1 · hPa−1 · s−1) at 700 hPa at Pujiang station appeared at 14:00 on July 17. The peak of GPS-PW occurred approximately 6 h earlier than that of the water vapor flux. Figure 9 shows a profile of the vertical velocity of the center of the TPV at various times along the center of the SWV. At 20:00 on July 16, the SWV began to form. The vertical velocity of the vortex center at 30°N, 101°E ascended below 600 hPa and descended between 600 hPa and 300 hPa layer as the GPS-PW value ascended. At 08:00 on July 17, which was the stagnant period of the vortex, the vertical velocity of the SWV center abruptly ascended from low to high levels, and the convective motion reached its peak. At 20:00, the vortex began to move eastward to Sichuan Basin (31°N, 106°E), and the ascending motion weakened and finally descended. At the same time, the GPS-PW dropped to a low value, which was evident before moving eastward of the vortex. The GPS-PW clearly began to surge approximately 8 h earlier than the vortex development, and the maximum value occurred prior to the peak of the ascending motion of the vortex center. Continuous airflow and water convergence strongly influenced rainfall in the basin.Evolution of water vapor flux recorded on July 15–18, 2010, at (a) Pujiang and (b) Chengdu stations (unit: g · cm−1 · hPa−1 · s−1).
(a)
(b)Profiles of the vertical velocity at the SWV center recorded at various times. (a) 20:00 on July 16, (b) 08:00 on July 17, and (c) 20:00 on July 17, 2010 (unit: hPa · s−1).
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.2.1. Background of Weather

Because of the low-level jet from Nanhai and the invasion of northern cold air, combined with the long duration of the SWV in Sichuan Basin, heavy rain occurred in the northeastern Sichuan Basin on July 15–18, 2010. This rainfall event was of high intensity and long duration, and the precipitation measured at each station exceeded 20 mm. At Pujiang station, it reached 95.4 mm; the maximum 1 h rainfall was 33.8 mm.


## 3.2.2. Relationship between GPS-PW and Rainfall during Period of SWV

Changes in the average GPS-PW value recorded at Chengdu, Dayi, Pujiang, and Longquanyi stations clearly show that this rainfall process can be divided into two stages: during the nighttime on July 15 and from nighttime on July 16 to the morning of July 17 (Figure6). Approximately 6 h prior to the rainfall, the GPS-PW began to increase sharply and reached its first maximum value at 15:00 on July 15. The GPS-PW value fluctuated slightly when the rain began. However, the peak of rainfall and that of GPS-PW did not always coincide. When the atmospheric water condensed in the form of rain and fell to the ground, GPS-PW clearly decreased. At 12:00 on July 16, GPS-PW surged again and reached its maximum value of 57.45 mm at 23:00 on July 16. The second stage of rainfall occurred during this GPS-PW surge. The average rainfall was heavier than that recorded during the first stage; however, the peak of rainfall occurred approximately 4 h earlier than that of the GPS-PW. As shown in Figure 7, the GPS-PW recorded at each station reached maximum values at 00:00 on July 17; within 1 h, the maximum rainfall and GPS-PW were consistent with the distribution of the high value of GPS-PW. The peak value of GPS-PW during the second stage was greater than that during the first stage, and greater increases in amplitude of GPS-PW correlated with heavier rainfall. The oscillation change of GPS-PW was clear during this process; the changes in Chengdu and Pujiang stations were nearly the same; and the increase and decrease were largest at Dayi station. These results indicate that the convective instability of this rainfall was remarkable; no distinct diurnal cycle was observed at any station.Figure 6
Temporal series of the average value of GPS-PW and regional average precipitation recorded on July 15–18, 2010, in Chengdu Plain at Chengdu, Dayi, Jintang, Pujiang, and Longquanyi stations.GPS-PW values recorded at Chengdu, Dayi, and Pujiang stations on July (a) 16, (b) 17, and (c) 18, 2010.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.2.3. Contrast of GPS-PW and Physical Element Fields

Because the radiosonde station in southwestern China is unreliable in calculating the water vapor flux and the reanalysis data reasonably represents the atmospheric water in this region [43], the latter is generally used to evaluate this flux. As shown in Figure 8, Pujiang and Chengdu stations showed high values of water vapor flux from 02:00 to 20:00 on July 17, which coincided with the period of SWV stagnation. With the strengthening of the low-level jet in the southeastern SWV, the maximum value of water vapor flux field (21 g · cm−1 · hPa−1 · s−1) at 700 hPa at Pujiang station appeared at 14:00 on July 17. The peak of GPS-PW occurred approximately 6 h earlier than that of the water vapor flux. Figure 9 shows a profile of the vertical velocity of the center of the TPV at various times along the center of the SWV. At 20:00 on July 16, the SWV began to form. The vertical velocity of the vortex center at 30°N, 101°E ascended below 600 hPa and descended between 600 hPa and 300 hPa layer as the GPS-PW value ascended. At 08:00 on July 17, which was the stagnant period of the vortex, the vertical velocity of the SWV center abruptly ascended from low to high levels, and the convective motion reached its peak. At 20:00, the vortex began to move eastward to Sichuan Basin (31°N, 106°E), and the ascending motion weakened and finally descended. At the same time, the GPS-PW dropped to a low value, which was evident before moving eastward of the vortex. The GPS-PW clearly began to surge approximately 8 h earlier than the vortex development, and the maximum value occurred prior to the peak of the ascending motion of the vortex center. Continuous airflow and water convergence strongly influenced rainfall in the basin.Evolution of water vapor flux recorded on July 15–18, 2010, at (a) Pujiang and (b) Chengdu stations (unit: g · cm−1 · hPa−1 · s−1).
(a)
(b)Profiles of the vertical velocity at the SWV center recorded at various times. (a) 20:00 on July 16, (b) 08:00 on July 17, and (c) 20:00 on July 17, 2010 (unit: hPa · s−1).
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.3. Application of GPS-PW in Analysis of Heavy Rain Caused by TPV and SWV

### 3.3.1. Weather Analysis

A regional rainstorm occurred from west to east in Sichuan Basin on July 20–22, 2008, in which the unevenly distributed rainfall was mainly located in the western basin. The rain was first observed at Chengdu station at 11:30 on July 20 and finally observed at Dayi station at 22:00 on July 21. The main rainfall occurred at noon and during the nighttime on July 20. The interaction of the TPV and SWV triggered the strong development of the southwesterly low-level jet. The rain caused by the TPV was not apparent in the absence of the SWV. However, the SWV was induced with the eastward movement of the TPV. The interaction and development of these two vortices related to TP caused the heavy rain event in a large area of southwestern China.


### 3.3.2. Relationship between GPS-PW and Rainfall during Periods of TPV and SWV

As shown in Figure10, a high GPS-PW level of 50 mm caused by the TPV formed in the eastern plateau prior to rainfall. At 07:00 on July 20, the GPS-PW increased slowly and reached a high value of 61.8 mm at 13:00 with a rate of increase at 1.2 mm/0.5 h. The rainfall occurred approximately 5 h after this increase. During the eastward movement of the TPV, the GPS-PW decreased slowly, increased again at 17:00, and reached its maximum of 72.1 mm at 21:30 20. At the same time, low-pressure circulation was induced at a low level over the western Sichuan Basin, which developed quickly to form the SWV. Subsequently, the GPS-PW increased with fluctuation and reached a second high value of 71.5 mm at 01:30 on July 21. It should be noted that the peak of the two rainfall processes occurred approximately 1 h before and after that of the GPS-PW. The GPS-PW increased to its high value through the coupling process, during which time the rainfall at the second stage was greater than that during the first. The high value of GPS-PW was distributed from noon to nighttime on July 20 and during the early morning of July 21, as indicated by Figures 10 and 11, which is consistent with the west to east movement of the vortex and its rain. Figure 11 shows that the value of GPS-PW was higher during the nighttime and lower during the day, which indicates that the high value of GPS-PW was necessary for the rainfall to occur.Figure 10
Temporal series of the average value of GPS-PW and regional average precipitation recorded on July 20–22, 2008, in Chengdu Plain at Chengdu, Dayi, Jintang, Pujiang, and Longquanyi stations.GPS-PW values recorded at Chengdu, Dayi, and Pujiang on July (a) 20, (b) July 21, and (c) July 22, 2008.
(a)
(b)
(c)


### 3.3.3. Comparison of GPS-PW and Physical Element Fields

As shown in Figure12, the water vapor flux at 850 hPa increased slightly from 08:00 to 20:00 on July 20, which was caused by the weak southwestward airflow over the basin during formation of the TPV. During the first stage of rainfall, the peak of GPS-PW occurred approximately 7 h prior to that of the water vapor flux. At 08:00 on July 21, the southwestward wind near the basin strengthened; the SWV and the TPV coupled; and the water vapor flux of the Chengdu Plain reached 8 g · cm−1 · hPa−1 · s−1. At the same time, the second stage of the main rainfall occurred. The peak of GPS-PW occurred earlier than that of the water vapor flux. The water vapor flux then increased continuously and reached its maximum at 700 hPa and 850 hPa at 20:00. The humidity in the basin increased, and the rainfall increased significantly through the influence of the two vortices and the transfer of atmospheric water.Evolution of water vapor flux recorded on July 20–22, 2008, at (a) Pujiang and (b) Chengdu stations (unit: g · cm−1 · hPa−1 · s−1).
(a)
(b)Figure13 shows that at 20:00 on July 20, the vertical velocity of vortex center at 32.5°N, 100.5°E descended below 550 hPa before ascending between 550 hPa and 300 hPa and descending above 300 hPa. At 08:00 on July 21, the vertical motion of the vortex center at 31°N, 105°E was nearly completely opposite to that of the previous movement of descent from 600 hPa to 300 hPa. At that moment, the SWV formed in Sichuan Basin and coupled with the TPV, which strengthened the center of the SWV. At 20:00, it showed strong ascending motion from the low to high layers, and the maximum vertical velocity reached −10 × 10−1 hPa · s−1. The GPS-PW surged approximately 13 h prior to development of the SWV. However, the GPS-PW dropped to the level before the generation of SWV when SWV developed to the strongest. These results demonstrate that the increase of GPS-PW may indicate the development of the vortex for this case. However, additional cases should be tested to obtain definitive results.Profiles of the vertical velocity at the SWV center recorded at various times. (a) 20:00 on July 20, (b) 08:00 on July 21, and (c) 20:00 on July 21 (unit: hPa · s−1).
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.3.1. Weather Analysis

A regional rainstorm occurred from west to east in Sichuan Basin on July 20–22, 2008, in which the unevenly distributed rainfall was mainly located in the western basin. The rain was first observed at Chengdu station at 11:30 on July 20 and finally observed at Dayi station at 22:00 on July 21. The main rainfall occurred at noon and during the nighttime on July 20. The interaction of the TPV and SWV triggered the strong development of the southwesterly low-level jet. The rain caused by the TPV was not apparent in the absence of the SWV. However, the SWV was induced with the eastward movement of the TPV. The interaction and development of these two vortices related to TP caused the heavy rain event in a large area of southwestern China.


## 3.3.2. Relationship between GPS-PW and Rainfall during Periods of TPV and SWV

As shown in Figure10, a high GPS-PW level of 50 mm caused by the TPV formed in the eastern plateau prior to rainfall. At 07:00 on July 20, the GPS-PW increased slowly and reached a high value of 61.8 mm at 13:00 with a rate of increase at 1.2 mm/0.5 h. The rainfall occurred approximately 5 h after this increase. During the eastward movement of the TPV, the GPS-PW decreased slowly, increased again at 17:00, and reached its maximum of 72.1 mm at 21:30 20. At the same time, low-pressure circulation was induced at a low level over the western Sichuan Basin, which developed quickly to form the SWV. Subsequently, the GPS-PW increased with fluctuation and reached a second high value of 71.5 mm at 01:30 on July 21. It should be noted that the peak of the two rainfall processes occurred approximately 1 h before and after that of the GPS-PW. The GPS-PW increased to its high value through the coupling process, during which time the rainfall at the second stage was greater than that during the first. The high value of GPS-PW was distributed from noon to nighttime on July 20 and during the early morning of July 21, as indicated by Figures 10 and 11, which is consistent with the west to east movement of the vortex and its rain. Figure 11 shows that the value of GPS-PW was higher during the nighttime and lower during the day, which indicates that the high value of GPS-PW was necessary for the rainfall to occur.Figure 10
Temporal series of the average value of GPS-PW and regional average precipitation recorded on July 20–22, 2008, in Chengdu Plain at Chengdu, Dayi, Jintang, Pujiang, and Longquanyi stations.GPS-PW values recorded at Chengdu, Dayi, and Pujiang on July (a) 20, (b) July 21, and (c) July 22, 2008.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.3.3. Comparison of GPS-PW and Physical Element Fields

As shown in Figure12, the water vapor flux at 850 hPa increased slightly from 08:00 to 20:00 on July 20, which was caused by the weak southwestward airflow over the basin during formation of the TPV. During the first stage of rainfall, the peak of GPS-PW occurred approximately 7 h prior to that of the water vapor flux. At 08:00 on July 21, the southwestward wind near the basin strengthened; the SWV and the TPV coupled; and the water vapor flux of the Chengdu Plain reached 8 g · cm−1 · hPa−1 · s−1. At the same time, the second stage of the main rainfall occurred. The peak of GPS-PW occurred earlier than that of the water vapor flux. The water vapor flux then increased continuously and reached its maximum at 700 hPa and 850 hPa at 20:00. The humidity in the basin increased, and the rainfall increased significantly through the influence of the two vortices and the transfer of atmospheric water.Evolution of water vapor flux recorded on July 20–22, 2008, at (a) Pujiang and (b) Chengdu stations (unit: g · cm−1 · hPa−1 · s−1).
(a)
(b)Figure13 shows that at 20:00 on July 20, the vertical velocity of vortex center at 32.5°N, 100.5°E descended below 550 hPa before ascending between 550 hPa and 300 hPa and descending above 300 hPa. At 08:00 on July 21, the vertical motion of the vortex center at 31°N, 105°E was nearly completely opposite to that of the previous movement of descent from 600 hPa to 300 hPa. At that moment, the SWV formed in Sichuan Basin and coupled with the TPV, which strengthened the center of the SWV. At 20:00, it showed strong ascending motion from the low to high layers, and the maximum vertical velocity reached −10 × 10−1 hPa · s−1. The GPS-PW surged approximately 13 h prior to development of the SWV. However, the GPS-PW dropped to the level before the generation of SWV when SWV developed to the strongest. These results demonstrate that the increase of GPS-PW may indicate the development of the vortex for this case. However, additional cases should be tested to obtain definitive results.Profiles of the vertical velocity at the SWV center recorded at various times. (a) 20:00 on July 20, (b) 08:00 on July 21, and (c) 20:00 on July 21 (unit: hPa · s−1).
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 4. Conclusion and Discussion

In this study, high-resolution precipitable water data obtained through ground-based GPS technology was used to analyze the heavy rain caused by various plateau weather systems. Three vortex-like rainstorms occurring in Sichuan Basin caused by the development and the eastward shift of the TPV and SWV in September 2007, July 2010, and July 2008 were analyzed comprehensively by using GPS-PW data derived through the GPS observation network of Chengdu Plain combined with routine meteorological observation data, intensive observation data, and reanalysis data. The results are summarized in the following points.(1)
GPS-PW increased before the development of TPV and SWV. Rainfall occurred mostly during high values of GPS-PW. The surge and drop of the GPS-PW may indicate the beginning and the end of vortex rain, respectively, in some cases.(2)
During the process of rain caused by the TPV, the GPS-PW showed small fluctuation of its high value level, and the peak of rainfall occurred earlier or at nearly the same time as the GPS-PW. After that time, the GPS-PW maintained the changes with the amount of vortex dynamics elements and water vapor fluxes at each stage of rainfall development.(3)
In a specific case study, the increase in water was caused mainly by continuous southwestward airflow and the lifting of convergence during a rainfall process caused by SWV, which coincided with a larger fluctuation in GPS-PW values. When GPS-PW reached a certain level, rainfall commenced; however, the GPS-PW decreased after rainfall. When the vortex circulation and water transfer remained constant, the GPS-PW surged again, causing situations that are conducive to a new stage of rainfall. In this study, the peak of GPS-PW occurred earlier than that of the water vapor flux. The increase of GPS-PW occurred earlier than the generation of the vortex, and the vortex development lagged behind the maximum GPS-PW.(4)
During the process of rainfall caused by the TPV, which occurred on July 15–18, 2010, the GPS-PW maintained its high value before formation of the SWV, and the rainfall occurred after further increase in GPS-PW. This increase was significantly influenced and strengthened by the coupling of these two vortices. The peak of GPS-PW occurred earlier than that of the water flux, and the GPS-PW surged prior to development of the SWV. This supplement and increase in atmospheric water was highly beneficial for the development of low-level vortex circulation.Finally, it should be noted that the characteristics of GPS-PW and their correlation to atmospheric water were analyzed by using only three short periods of data in this study. Therefore, the behavior of GPS-PW shown in this paper may not be indicative of general patterns. It is necessary to research other TPV and SWV periods by using more data to further support the conclusions drawn in this study. The universal applicability of some of these conclusions should be fully tested and improved upon by additional cases and data, and the analysis of atmospheric energy should also be considered in comparison with physical element fields. Nevertheless, the results of this study can be used preliminarily to show that GPS-PW can be used as a new and useful tool for monitoring atmospheric water in weather analysis and forecasting over and near the TP. Thus, this study can enrich the scientific understanding of heavy rainstorms caused by the TPV and SWV, as well as upgrade the operational monitoring and forecasting of high-impact weather influenced by the TP.



---

*Source: 793957-2013-12-08.xml*