# Application of a Noncarboxylated Dye Compound in a Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell Containing a Cyclodextrin Layer

Authors: Tatsuya Takeshita; Takao Umeda; Noriaki Oonishi; Michihiro Hara
Journal: International Journal of Photoenergy
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

We report the fabrication and characterization of a dye-sensitized solar cell containing a carboxymethyl-β-cyclodextrin sodium salt (CM-β-CD) layer and a noncarboxylated dye compound (tris(2,2′-bipyridyl)ruthenium(II)dichloride hexahydrate (Ru-dye)). The values of the incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) of the Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing device measured under 450 and 490 nm light irradiation were, respectively, 2.35% and 3.33%. The IPCE was due to the absorption of Ru-dye in ethanol solution. In contrast, the IPCE of the device that was prepared without the CM-β-CD layer measured under 450 nm irradiation was approximately three times smaller. Accordingly, the current findings demonstrate the application of a noncarboxylated dye compound in DSSCs incorporating a CM-β-CD layer.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) have attracted much attention owing to their colorful appearance, low manufacturing cost, and application as a clean energy conversion device. Recently, various types of highly efficient DSSCs, such as organic thin film devices, flexible, and perovskite-based devices, have been produced at low cost [1–9]. The photoelectric conversion mechanism of DSSCs involves the following processes: (1) injection of electrons by the photoexcited chemically adsorbed dye molecule into the titanium oxide (TiO2) layer and (2) reduction of the oxidized dye by a redox couple (I/I3-) present in the electrolyte. The maximum conversion efficiency of DSSCs reported to date is ~10% [10]; however, the conversion efficiency values remain to date significantly lower than the expected theoretical values [11] for inorganic solar cells. To address this issue, various parameters of the DSSC have been examined such as the photoanode, the counter electrode, and the optical properties of the dye and the electrolyte [12–19]. To improve cell performance, studies on the inclusion of a cyclodextrin- (CD-) based layer in the photoanode of DSSCs, though rare, have been reported, as exemplified. The inclusion of complexes of β-cyclodextrin and 4-methyl-1-cyclohexane carboxylic acid has been reported to inhibit electron recombination of the injected electrons and redox couples near the surface of the bare TiO2 particles (employed as part of the photoanode) [20]. Additionally, the inclusion of [2]rotaxane formed by β-cyclodextrin and terpyridyl ruthenium complex achieved a cell conversion efficiency of 0.523% [21]. In contrast, the introduction of a dye molecule into DSSCs containing a CD layer via the inclusion effect of CD and the resulting cell performance have not been reported.Presently, it is known that specific substituents, that is, carboxyl groups, are necessary for the chemical adsorption of the dye onto semiconductor TiO2. However, such a requirement limits the choice of the dye compound for application in DSSCs that could potentially limit progress in the performance of DSSCs. It is known that CD molecules have cavities of which the sizes are dependent on the number of glucose units (α-CD: 6 units; β-CD: 7 units; γ-CD: 8 units). The cavities can include various types of organic compounds by hydrophobic interaction in aqueous media. Thus, the incorporation of a CD layer in the device for the inclusion of dye molecules, not requiring specific (carboxylate) adsorptive groups, is expected to broaden the selection of dye molecules for application in DSSCs. Thus, offering a new strategy for the development of DSSCs with improved performance. Herein, we examined the fabrication and characterization of DSSCs featuring a CD (carboxymethyl-β-cyclodextrin sodium salt (CM-β-CD; Figure 1)) layer and the application of a noncarboxylated dye compound (tris-(2,2′-bipyridyl)ruthenium(II)dichloride hexahydrate (Ru-dye; Figure 2)) in DSSCs.Figure 1
Molecular structure of carboxymethyl-β-cyclodextrin sodium salt (CM-β-CD).Figure 2
Molecular structure of tris(2,2′-bipyridyl)ruthenium(II)dichloride hexahydrate (Ru-dye).


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Materials

The TiO2 paste was prepared by mixing TiO2 particles (6.0 g, Nippon Aerosil, Tokyo, Japan), polyethylene glycol (0.3 g, Nacalai Tesque), acetylacetonate (0.15 mL, WAKO), and Triton X-100 (0.3 mL, Nacalai Tesque). Ru-dye was purchased from Tokyo Kasei (Japan). The electrolyte solution was purchased from Solaronix. CM-β-CD was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Japan). The fluorine-doped tin oxide- (FTO-) coated glass with a sheet resistance of 9.3 Ω/cm2 was purchased from Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. Titanium tetrachloride (TiCl4), benzene (spectrophotometric grade), and ethanol (spectrophotometric grade) were purchased from WAKO. All materials were used as received.


### 2.2. Device Fabrication

FTO-coated glass substrates were cleaned by successive washing in acetone (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan), assisted with sonication and acetone vapor. Then, the FTO-coated glass substrates were irradiated with ultraviolet light (Senjyu UV lamp VX-200HK002) for 20 min. The TiO2 paste was transferred to a bottle, and churning was performed for 10 min using a churning deaerator (THINKY, AR-100). Then, the TiO2 paste was applied onto the FTO-coated glass substrates by a squeegee method and sintered for 1 h at 500°C. The temperature was set to rise from room temperature to 500°C for 20 min. The FTO-coated glass substrates were then immersed in 0.1 M TiCl4 aqueous solution for 18 h. After immersion, the substrates were dried with warm air, and sintered at 500°C for 1 h. Two devices were fabricated in the absence and presence of a CM-β-CD layer (referred to as Ru-dye-containing and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing devices, resp.). Adsorption of CM-β-CD onto the TiO2-based DSSCs was performed by immersing the device in 2.9 × 10−2 g/mL CM-β-CD aqueous solution for 24 h. Following immersion, the device was immersed in 3.0 × 10−2M ethanol solution for 24 h. Any residual dye solution was rinsed off with benzene. The counter electrode was fabricated by Pt sputtering the FTO-coated glass in Ar atmosphere.


### 2.3. Measurements

The current (I)-voltage (V) profiles of the devices under light irradiation (light source comprised 500 W Xe lamp, USHIO UXL-500SX, and MT10-T monochromator; Bunkoukeiki Co., Ltd.) were recorded on an Advantest R6243 power source meter. A condenser lens was also used. The light intensity was measured using a power meter (Broadband Power/Energy Meter, 13PEM 001, Melles Griot). For theI-V and light intensity measurements, an aperture mask of 0.28 cm2 was set on the device and power meter. TheI-V measurements were performed on an open cell. The short-circuit current density (Isc), open-circuit voltage (Voc), fill factor (FF), and incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) were evaluated from theI-V profiles. The absorption and fluorescence spectra of Ru-dye in ethanol solution, and the Ru-dye-containing and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing devices were recorded on a spectrophotometer (Hitachi, U-3310) and a fluorescence spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, LS55), respectively.


## 2.1. Materials

The TiO2 paste was prepared by mixing TiO2 particles (6.0 g, Nippon Aerosil, Tokyo, Japan), polyethylene glycol (0.3 g, Nacalai Tesque), acetylacetonate (0.15 mL, WAKO), and Triton X-100 (0.3 mL, Nacalai Tesque). Ru-dye was purchased from Tokyo Kasei (Japan). The electrolyte solution was purchased from Solaronix. CM-β-CD was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Japan). The fluorine-doped tin oxide- (FTO-) coated glass with a sheet resistance of 9.3 Ω/cm2 was purchased from Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. Titanium tetrachloride (TiCl4), benzene (spectrophotometric grade), and ethanol (spectrophotometric grade) were purchased from WAKO. All materials were used as received.


## 2.2. Device Fabrication

FTO-coated glass substrates were cleaned by successive washing in acetone (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan), assisted with sonication and acetone vapor. Then, the FTO-coated glass substrates were irradiated with ultraviolet light (Senjyu UV lamp VX-200HK002) for 20 min. The TiO2 paste was transferred to a bottle, and churning was performed for 10 min using a churning deaerator (THINKY, AR-100). Then, the TiO2 paste was applied onto the FTO-coated glass substrates by a squeegee method and sintered for 1 h at 500°C. The temperature was set to rise from room temperature to 500°C for 20 min. The FTO-coated glass substrates were then immersed in 0.1 M TiCl4 aqueous solution for 18 h. After immersion, the substrates were dried with warm air, and sintered at 500°C for 1 h. Two devices were fabricated in the absence and presence of a CM-β-CD layer (referred to as Ru-dye-containing and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing devices, resp.). Adsorption of CM-β-CD onto the TiO2-based DSSCs was performed by immersing the device in 2.9 × 10−2 g/mL CM-β-CD aqueous solution for 24 h. Following immersion, the device was immersed in 3.0 × 10−2M ethanol solution for 24 h. Any residual dye solution was rinsed off with benzene. The counter electrode was fabricated by Pt sputtering the FTO-coated glass in Ar atmosphere.


## 2.3. Measurements

The current (I)-voltage (V) profiles of the devices under light irradiation (light source comprised 500 W Xe lamp, USHIO UXL-500SX, and MT10-T monochromator; Bunkoukeiki Co., Ltd.) were recorded on an Advantest R6243 power source meter. A condenser lens was also used. The light intensity was measured using a power meter (Broadband Power/Energy Meter, 13PEM 001, Melles Griot). For theI-V and light intensity measurements, an aperture mask of 0.28 cm2 was set on the device and power meter. TheI-V measurements were performed on an open cell. The short-circuit current density (Isc), open-circuit voltage (Voc), fill factor (FF), and incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) were evaluated from theI-V profiles. The absorption and fluorescence spectra of Ru-dye in ethanol solution, and the Ru-dye-containing and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing devices were recorded on a spectrophotometer (Hitachi, U-3310) and a fluorescence spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, LS55), respectively.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Steady-State Absorption and Fluorescence Spectra

Figure3 shows the steady-state absorption spectrum (black line) of Ru-dye in ethanol solution. A maximum absorption peak was observed at ~450 nm in the visible light region. A maximum fluorescence peak (red line) was observed at ~606 nm using a 450-nm light irradiation. The color (yellow) of the solution was consistent with a solution molar concentration in the order of 10−5 M.Figure 3
Absorption (black) and fluorescence (red) spectra of Ru-dye (1.1 × 10−5 M) in ethanol.


### 3.2. Structure of the Ru-Dye/CM-β-CD Complex

The most stable minimum-energy structure obtained from the inclusion of Ru-dye into CM-β-CD, as calculated by MM2, is shown in Figure 4. The length and width of Ru-dye along the long and short axes were, respectively, 11.7 Å and 9.6 Å. The calculations indicated that only one of the pyridine rings of Ru-dye was incorporated into CM-β-CD while the two bipyridine units of Ru-dye protruded into the solution.Figure 4
Minimum energy structure of the Ru-dye/CM-β-CD complex as calculated by MM2. The Ru-dye/CM-β-CD complex was modeled and subjected to geometry optimization to the most energetically stable structure using CS Chem3D.The photoelectrode surface of the device changed from white to yellow following immersion in the Ru-dye solution. The color of the photoelectrode surface was consistent with the color of Ru-dye in ethanol (1.1 × 10−5 M). The adsorption of Ru-dye onto the TiO2 surface is expected to occur via chemical bonds between TiO2 and hexahydrate Ru-dye. The fluorescence maximum peaks of the Ru-dye-containing and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing devices were observed at ~570 and ~608 nm, using 450 nm light irradiation, respectively (Figure 5). In addition to the shift in the fluorescence maximum peak, the Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing device featured a broader fluorescence spectrum. For the Ru-dye-noncontaining and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-noncontaining, fluorescence characteristics pertaining to TiO2 were not observed using an excitation wavelength of 450 nm. This result indicated that Ru-dye was incorporated into the cavities of CM-β-CD. Therefore, the result suggested the occurrence of adsorption of the carboxylic acid sodium salt group of CM-β-CD onto TiO2 and inclusion of Ru-dye into the cavities of CM-β-CD (in addition to the direct adsorption of Ru-dye onto TiO2).Figure 5
Fluorescence spectra of the Ru-dye-containing and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing devices following excitation with 450 nm light irradiation.


### 3.3. Photovoltaic Performance of the DSSCs

TheI-V characteristics of the Ru-dye-containing and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing devices were measured under 450 nm light irradiation (Figure 6). The irradiation wavelength was selected according to the absorption peak of Ru-dye in ethanol solution. As observed, the Ru-dye-containing and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing devices featuredI-V properties. Here,I-V characteristics were not affected by temperature from 15 to 25°C (i.e., at room temperature).Figure 6
I-V profiles of the Ru-dye-containing and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing devices measured under 450 nm light irradiation.In contrast, the TiO2 DSSC prepared in the absence of a dye sensitizing layer (i.e., Ru-dye or Ru-dye/CM-β-CD) did not display anyI-V characteristics under 450 nm light irradiation. This confirms the onset of photoabsorption of Ru-dye and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD for photoelectric conversion to occur (expressions (1) and (2)). (1)S0+hνλ=450nm:2.8eV⟶S12.2eV⟶photoelectric conversionRu-dye(2)S0+hνλ=450nm:2.8eV⟶S12.0eV⟶photoelectric conversionRu-dye/CM-β-CDThe singlet excitation energy (S1) values of the Ru-dye-containing and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing devices were calculated as 2.2 and 2.0 eV from the respective fluorescence spectra. TheS1 values of the Ru-dye-containing and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing devices are smaller than the photon energy associated with 450 nm light irradiation (i.e., 2.8 eV), thereby implying the onset of photoelectric conversion (Figure 7).Figure 7
Energy diagrams of the Ru-dye-containing and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing devices showing the ground and excited states of the devices.The calculated IPCE values (under 450 nm light irradiation) of the Ru-dye-containing and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing devices were 0.77% and 2.35%, respectively (Table 1). The higher IPCE of the Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing device was attributed to the increase in the concentration of Ru-dye in the device as a result of the CM-β-CD inclusion effect discussed earlier. Additionally, higher Voc and FF values were observed for the Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing device when compared with those of the Ru-dye-containing device. Improvements in the Voc and FF were attributed to the reduced electron recombination processes with I3- in the electrolyte and electrons of the bare surface of the TiO2 particles in the presence of the Ru-dye/CM-β-CD layer [20].Table 1
Photovoltaic performance of devices prepared in the absence and presence of a CM-β-CD layer.
Device
λ
FF
V
oc
I
sc
IPCE
(nm)
(V)
(mA/cm2)
(%)
Ru-dye
450
0.49
0.28
0.012
0.77
Ru-dye/CM-β-CD
450
0.78
0.52
0.035
2.35
490
0.81
0.54
0.062
3.33To confirm the photoabsorption of the Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing device in the visible light region, theI-V profiles of the device and associated IPCE values were calculated in the visible light region at intervals of 10 nm. TheI-V profile of the device measured under 580 nm light irradiation is also included (Figure 8, black markers). Maximum IPCE of the Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing device was obtained under 490 nm light irradiation (Figure 8, blue markers). The Isc, Voc, and FF values obtained under 490 nm light irradiation are also listed in Table 1. The absorption spectrum of Ru-dye in ethanol and the IPCE spectrum of the Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing device were compared (Figure 9). As observed, the IPCE plot of the Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing device and absorption spectrum of Ru-dye in ethanol were comparable, which indicates that photoconversion efficiency is due to the photoabsorption of Ru-dye. However, the maximum IPCE peak was shifted by 40 nm relative to the absorption peak of Ru-dye in ethanol. This result suggests that Ru-dye is stabilized by polarity of the ethanol solution. Therefore, Ru-dye/CM-β-CD was photoabsorbed and acted as a sensitizing dye (Scheme 1).Scheme 1
Model of the adsorption of Ru-dye/CM-β-CD complex onto TiO2.Figure 8
I-V profiles of the Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing device measured under 580, 490, and 450 nm light irradiation.Figure 9
Plots of IPCE versus wavelength of Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing device and absorption spectrum of Ru-dye (1.1 × 10−5 M) in ethanol.


## 3.1. Steady-State Absorption and Fluorescence Spectra

Figure3 shows the steady-state absorption spectrum (black line) of Ru-dye in ethanol solution. A maximum absorption peak was observed at ~450 nm in the visible light region. A maximum fluorescence peak (red line) was observed at ~606 nm using a 450-nm light irradiation. The color (yellow) of the solution was consistent with a solution molar concentration in the order of 10−5 M.Figure 3
Absorption (black) and fluorescence (red) spectra of Ru-dye (1.1 × 10−5 M) in ethanol.


## 3.2. Structure of the Ru-Dye/CM-β-CD Complex

The most stable minimum-energy structure obtained from the inclusion of Ru-dye into CM-β-CD, as calculated by MM2, is shown in Figure 4. The length and width of Ru-dye along the long and short axes were, respectively, 11.7 Å and 9.6 Å. The calculations indicated that only one of the pyridine rings of Ru-dye was incorporated into CM-β-CD while the two bipyridine units of Ru-dye protruded into the solution.Figure 4
Minimum energy structure of the Ru-dye/CM-β-CD complex as calculated by MM2. The Ru-dye/CM-β-CD complex was modeled and subjected to geometry optimization to the most energetically stable structure using CS Chem3D.The photoelectrode surface of the device changed from white to yellow following immersion in the Ru-dye solution. The color of the photoelectrode surface was consistent with the color of Ru-dye in ethanol (1.1 × 10−5 M). The adsorption of Ru-dye onto the TiO2 surface is expected to occur via chemical bonds between TiO2 and hexahydrate Ru-dye. The fluorescence maximum peaks of the Ru-dye-containing and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing devices were observed at ~570 and ~608 nm, using 450 nm light irradiation, respectively (Figure 5). In addition to the shift in the fluorescence maximum peak, the Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing device featured a broader fluorescence spectrum. For the Ru-dye-noncontaining and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-noncontaining, fluorescence characteristics pertaining to TiO2 were not observed using an excitation wavelength of 450 nm. This result indicated that Ru-dye was incorporated into the cavities of CM-β-CD. Therefore, the result suggested the occurrence of adsorption of the carboxylic acid sodium salt group of CM-β-CD onto TiO2 and inclusion of Ru-dye into the cavities of CM-β-CD (in addition to the direct adsorption of Ru-dye onto TiO2).Figure 5
Fluorescence spectra of the Ru-dye-containing and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing devices following excitation with 450 nm light irradiation.


## 3.3. Photovoltaic Performance of the DSSCs

TheI-V characteristics of the Ru-dye-containing and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing devices were measured under 450 nm light irradiation (Figure 6). The irradiation wavelength was selected according to the absorption peak of Ru-dye in ethanol solution. As observed, the Ru-dye-containing and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing devices featuredI-V properties. Here,I-V characteristics were not affected by temperature from 15 to 25°C (i.e., at room temperature).Figure 6
I-V profiles of the Ru-dye-containing and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing devices measured under 450 nm light irradiation.In contrast, the TiO2 DSSC prepared in the absence of a dye sensitizing layer (i.e., Ru-dye or Ru-dye/CM-β-CD) did not display anyI-V characteristics under 450 nm light irradiation. This confirms the onset of photoabsorption of Ru-dye and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD for photoelectric conversion to occur (expressions (1) and (2)). (1)S0+hνλ=450nm:2.8eV⟶S12.2eV⟶photoelectric conversionRu-dye(2)S0+hνλ=450nm:2.8eV⟶S12.0eV⟶photoelectric conversionRu-dye/CM-β-CDThe singlet excitation energy (S1) values of the Ru-dye-containing and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing devices were calculated as 2.2 and 2.0 eV from the respective fluorescence spectra. TheS1 values of the Ru-dye-containing and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing devices are smaller than the photon energy associated with 450 nm light irradiation (i.e., 2.8 eV), thereby implying the onset of photoelectric conversion (Figure 7).Figure 7
Energy diagrams of the Ru-dye-containing and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing devices showing the ground and excited states of the devices.The calculated IPCE values (under 450 nm light irradiation) of the Ru-dye-containing and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing devices were 0.77% and 2.35%, respectively (Table 1). The higher IPCE of the Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing device was attributed to the increase in the concentration of Ru-dye in the device as a result of the CM-β-CD inclusion effect discussed earlier. Additionally, higher Voc and FF values were observed for the Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing device when compared with those of the Ru-dye-containing device. Improvements in the Voc and FF were attributed to the reduced electron recombination processes with I3- in the electrolyte and electrons of the bare surface of the TiO2 particles in the presence of the Ru-dye/CM-β-CD layer [20].Table 1
Photovoltaic performance of devices prepared in the absence and presence of a CM-β-CD layer.
Device
λ
FF
V
oc
I
sc
IPCE
(nm)
(V)
(mA/cm2)
(%)
Ru-dye
450
0.49
0.28
0.012
0.77
Ru-dye/CM-β-CD
450
0.78
0.52
0.035
2.35
490
0.81
0.54
0.062
3.33To confirm the photoabsorption of the Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing device in the visible light region, theI-V profiles of the device and associated IPCE values were calculated in the visible light region at intervals of 10 nm. TheI-V profile of the device measured under 580 nm light irradiation is also included (Figure 8, black markers). Maximum IPCE of the Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing device was obtained under 490 nm light irradiation (Figure 8, blue markers). The Isc, Voc, and FF values obtained under 490 nm light irradiation are also listed in Table 1. The absorption spectrum of Ru-dye in ethanol and the IPCE spectrum of the Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing device were compared (Figure 9). As observed, the IPCE plot of the Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing device and absorption spectrum of Ru-dye in ethanol were comparable, which indicates that photoconversion efficiency is due to the photoabsorption of Ru-dye. However, the maximum IPCE peak was shifted by 40 nm relative to the absorption peak of Ru-dye in ethanol. This result suggests that Ru-dye is stabilized by polarity of the ethanol solution. Therefore, Ru-dye/CM-β-CD was photoabsorbed and acted as a sensitizing dye (Scheme 1).Scheme 1
Model of the adsorption of Ru-dye/CM-β-CD complex onto TiO2.Figure 8
I-V profiles of the Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing device measured under 580, 490, and 450 nm light irradiation.Figure 9
Plots of IPCE versus wavelength of Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing device and absorption spectrum of Ru-dye (1.1 × 10−5 M) in ethanol.


## 4. Conclusion

We demonstrated the fabrication and characterization of a noncarboxylated Ru-dye-based DSSC incorporating a CM-β-CD layer. The formation of the Ru-dye/CM-β-CD inclusion complex was investigated by fluorescence spectroscopy. The fluorescence maximum peaks of the Ru-dye-containing and Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing devices were observed at ~570 and ~608 nm using an excitation wavelength of 450 nm. The shift in the maximum fluorescence peak of the CM-β-CD layer-containing device indicated that Ru-dye was incorporated into the CM-β-CD layer. TheI-V characteristics of the Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-containing device measured under 450 nm light irradiation confirmed the photoabsorption of Ru-dye/CM-β-CD relative to theI-V results of device fabricated in the absence of Ru-dye (TiO2 only), whereby photoabsorption was not observed. The IPCE was due to the absorption of Ru-dye. And the IPCE plot obtained at varying irradiation wavelengths nearly overlapped with the absorption spectrum of Ru-dye in ethanol measured at the same irradiation wavelengths. Additionally, the Ru-dye/CM-β-CD-based device featured improved photovoltaic performance.In summary, the inclusion of the CM-β-CD layer improved the photovoltaic performance of the cell containing a noncarboxylated dye compound. The findings present a gateway to future studies involving the optimization of devices incorporating a CM-β-CD layer and investigation of a wider selection of noncarboxylated compounds to achieve high photovoltaic efficiencies. Additionally, CM-β-CD-based DSSCs offer potential for IPCE control and enhancement of performance in the absence of external stimulus response molecules.



---

*Source: 786246-2015-10-04.xml*