# A Simple Cardiovascular Model for the Study of Hemorrhagic Shock

Authors: Luciano Curcio; Laura D’Orsi; Fabio Cibella; Linn Wagnert-Avraham; Dean Nachman; Andrea De Gaetano
Journal: Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

Hemorrhagic shock is the number one cause of death on the battlefield and in civilian trauma as well. Mathematical modeling has been applied in this context for decades; however, the formulation of a satisfactory model that is both practical and effective has yet to be achieved. This paper introduces an upgraded version of the 2007 Zenker model for hemorrhagic shock termed the ZenCur model that allows for a better description of the time course of relevant observations. Our study provides a simple but realistic mathematical description of cardiovascular dynamics that may be useful in the assessment and prognosis of hemorrhagic shock. This model is capable of replicating the changes in mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and cardiac output after the onset of bleeding (as observed in four experimental laboratory animals) and achieves a reasonable compromise between an overly detailed depiction of relevant mechanisms, on the one hand, and model simplicity, on the other. The former would require considerable simulations and entail burdensome interpretations. From a clinical standpoint, the goals of the new model are to predict survival and optimize the timing of therapy, in both civilian and military scenarios.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Hemorrhagic shock is the number one cause of death both on the battlefield and in civilian trauma. During the Vietnam War, it was found that approximately 50% of deaths were caused by exsanguination [1]. In civilian life, trauma and bleeding cause more deaths in young adults than all other causes combined [2]. Fatal hemorrhage represents a substantial global problem, with more than 60,000 deaths annually in the United States alone and an estimated 1.9 million deaths worldwide, 1.5 million of which are due to trauma [2, 3].Emergency treatment of severe hemorrhage is a common medical emergency, not infrequently leading to hemorrhagic shock. The current mainstay of hemorrhagic shock treatment consists in whole blood infusions, often large volumes over a short time, termed massive transfusion (MT). Furthermore, survivors of severe hemorrhage have poorer prognoses in terms of functional outcomes and significantly increased mortality [4, 5]. One approach to improving outcomes could focus on shortening the time intervals before diagnosing hemorrhagic shock.In order to offer healthcare providers with critical decision-making support tools, we needed to create a reliable mathematical model. Ease of use would have to be a key feature allowing practitioners to readily evaluate the individual patient and optimize available therapeutic strategies so as to limit the need for massive transfusions.Many studies have focused on developing experimental models of hemorrhagic shock to investigate its pathophysiology and to test therapeutic options [6, 7]. However, translating experimental results into clinical applications has remained an ongoing challenge [8].A variety of hemorrhagic shock models have been designed contemplating controlled or uncontrolled bleeding scenarios or combining hemorrhagic shock and polytrauma [9, 10]. The effectiveness of such mathematical models depends on the reliability in a patient-centered perspective. In order to be predictive, computational simulations require corroborating clinical data. To this end, key model parameters and initial and boundary conditions are estimated minimizing errors between model outputs and empirical measurements (i.e., by solving the so-called “inverse problem” [11]).Our model is essentially based on the one created by Zenker et al. [12] (albeit revised and upgraded). Zenker’s model [12], among all currently available models, appears to offer the best compromise between simplicity and relevance for clinicians. It can portray the evolution over time of most clinically relevant variables, such as mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), and central venous pressure (CVP).In particular, the hemodynamic responses simulated by this model match with physiological expectations during both volume loss (e.g., hemorrhage) and intravenous therapy (e.g., fluid resuscitation).As a model for predicting hemorrhagic shock in emergency settings, which lend themselves to pitfalls in physiological accuracy and interpretability, our aim is to create a tool that is both reliable and simple-to-use.Therefore, we opted for the Zenker model, as a starting point; however, we introduce an upgrade, dubbed the ZenCur model (i.e., combining Zenker and Curcio) that permits a more realistic elucidation of the pathophysiological mechanisms of shock.The rationale for the modification to the Zenker model, qualitatively correct in its response to variations in hydration status alone (total intravascular volume) throughout the bleeding phase, was its failure to predict the subsequent post-bleeding phase, since it is devoid of a fundamental homeostatic mechanism triggered by hemorrhage [13].A first key modification of Zenker’s model involved incorporating the homeostatic mechanism of transcapillary refill that accompanies significant degrees of fluid/blood loss.Although a new theory, i.e., the Revised Starling Principle, has emerged over the past decade [14–16], it was nevertheless deemed necessary to incorporate the effects of transcapillary fluid exchange into our model, based on more established understanding of physiology, as echoed by several authors [13, 17–24].For example, Prist et al. [21] demonstrated that the degree of hypovolemia resulting from the same total overall blood loss varied significantly at different rates of loss. At slower rates, compensation was greater due to capillary refill. Instead, the higher the rate, the more hemodynamic deterioration tended to be precipitous. These results warranted the inclusion of transcapillary fluid exchange as a key determinant that provided the rationale for its incorporation into our computational model.In particular, as an adjunct to the term which represents a withdrawal component due to the hemorrhage, we consider another complementary term representing transcapillary refill. The latter is clinically relevant inasmuch as it represents a non-negligible response of the circulatory system to any significant degree of acute blood loss. It also allows our model to realistically predict the trend of MAP, CO, and HR for a few hours after the end of the bleeding. It also allows to establish whether the patient needs an urgent transfusion to survive.Furthermore, in the graphs plotting the hemodynamic variables in the first instants of the simulations (i.e., state of the subject prior to hemorrhage), the Zenker model presents a “ripple” not attributable to physiological conditions.Therefore, to correct for it, we also introduced mathematical constraints into the initial conditions so as to eliminate the transient (“ripple”) in the curves at the beginning of the simulation. This transient effect occurs prior to achieving steady-state conditions for several physiological variables.In synthesis, we seek to understand the extent to which a simple cardiovascular model can replicate the known pathophysiological responses of healthy swine subjected to severe hemorrhage and whether such a model can elucidate the cause-effect relationships that underlie the predictable pattern of behaviors.In this article, we will describe the ZenCur model in greater detail and discuss the results achieved by comparing simulation andin vivo data.The main purpose of this work is to demonstrate the value of our mathematical model in the analysis of experimental behavior, using four specific laboratory animals.


## 2. Materials and Methods

Zenker’s cardiovascular system model consists of a single-ventricle heart that pumps blood into the large systemic arteries, equated to linear capacitors (in accord with the Windkessel model), whereby arterial pressure is governed by feedback control mechanisms [25, 26]. The pulmonary circulation is excluded for simplicity.Thus, Zenker developed this ordinary differential equation (ODE) model of the left heart, characterized by a single-cycle systolic phase and a diastolic phase.His simplified 5-ODE model of the cardiovascular system was inclusive of baroreflex pressure control, with a specific focus on the role of cardiac contractility, peripheral resistance, and blood volume, as well as the interactions among these factors [12].The model proposed by Zenker et al. represented a landmark innovation inasmuch as it represented a shift from beat-by-beat cardiac dynamics to a continuous variation of beat characteristics. As such, the Zenker model efficiently simulated physiological feedback loops as a continuous temporal representation.By contrast, previous authors [27] typically based their cardiovascular simulations on the computationally demanding constraints of intra-beat dynamics.More than to simulation scenarios requiring the specifics of the single cardiac cycle, the Zenker model is rather attuned to modeling whose focus is the overarching pattern of inter-beat dynamics, calibrated to a continuous, clinically significant, timescale.The ZenCur model not only contains every feature of Zenker’s model but also includes the adjunct homeostatic mechanism of transcapillary refill.In Subsections2.1 and 2.2, we will describe the circulatory and control systems of the Zenker model [12], respectively. Figure 1 shows a schematic representation of the model.Figure 1
Schema of the ZenCur model. At the top center, the pulsing univentricular heart goes from end-diastolicVED to end-systolic volume VES. Via a system of valves, the blood is driven (clockwise in the figure) into the arterial compartment. The pressure generated must overcome the total peripheral resistance RTPR and guarantees blood flow to the venous compartment which feeds back into the heart. Variations from the set point of arterial pressure PA determine corresponding variations in actuators. These include heart rate νHR, RTPR, myocardial contractility cPRSW, and unstressed venous volume VVun. Of note: variations of PA are processed through a sigmoidal nonlinearity and a linear element with first-order low-pass filter characteristics. Our model accounts for bleeding and for the physiological compensatory mechanism called transcapillary refill (adapted from Figure 2 in Zenker S, Rubin J, Clermont G., From Inverse Problems in Mathematical Physiology to Quantitative Differential Diagnoses, PLoS Computational Biology, 3 (2007), 2074).


### 2.1. Circulatory Model

The foremost role of the heart is to pump blood through the circulatory system, ensuring the transport of fluid, gases, and nutrients throughout the entire system. In the cardiocirculatory model considered, the pump consists of the left chambers of the heart (i.e., atrium plus ventricle).Via a two-phase process, every cardiac cycle ejects a volume of blood into the arterial tree then relaxes. In the first phase, or systole, the ventricle contracts so a fraction of its blood is forcefully ejected through the aortic (outflow) valve into the aorta, once the intraventricular pressure surpasses the aortic pressure. Prerequisite mitral (inflow) valve closure assures unidirectional flow. During the second phase, or diastole, a relatively longer period of ventricular relaxation ensues. The abrupt drop in intraventricular pressure causes the aortic valves to close and the mitral valve to open, such that the ventricle fills with blood.The net volume of blood ejected into the aorta by each systolic contraction is the stroke volume, calculated as follows:(1)VS=VED−VES,in which the stroke volume (VS) is the difference between the end-diastolic volume (VED), when the ventricle is most replete with blood, and the end-systolic volume (VES) after the cardiac contraction, but immediately prior to ventricular relaxation.Assuming that ventricular volume will not usually decrease belowkVED0, we can define V~ES, i.e., the current end-systolic volume, as a function of the end-diastolic volume, as follows [12]:
(2)V~ESVED=maxkVED0,VED−CPRSW·VED−kVED0PA−PED,ifPA>PLVVED=PED,kVED0,otherwise,where kVED0 is the volume at which intraventricular pressure equals 0 mmHg [28], PLV is the ventricular pressure, CPRSW represents the linear relation between stroke work and end-diastolic volume [29], PA is the arterial pressure, and PED is end-diastolic pressure within the ventricle, respectively.The current end-diastolic volumeV~ED as a function of VES can be expressed as follows [12]:
(3)V~EDVES=−1kELV·log−P0LVPCVP+P0LV·e−kELV·kVED0·e−kELV·PCVP+P0LV/Rvalve·tDiast−1++e−kELV·VES+PCVP+P0LV/Rvalve·tDiast,ifPCVP>PLVVES=PES,VES,otherwise,where kELV is a constant characterizing the passive empirical pressure/volume relationship [28], P0LV is the passive empirical ventricular pressure [28], PCVP is the central venous pressure, and PES is the ventricular pressure at end-systolic volume, respectively. In particular, tDiast is the duration of diastole:
(4)tDiast=1νHR−tSyst,where
(5)tSyst=1νHR0max·0.8,where νHR is the heart rate and νHR0max is the maximum initial value for heart rate.The end-systolic ventricular volumeVES is evaluated as [12]
(6)dVESdt=V~ES−VES·νHR.The end-diastolic ventricular volumeVED is described by the following differential equation [12]:
(7)dVEDdt=V~ED−VED·νHR.A simple Windkessel model is used to represent systemic circulation, comprising linear compliancesC in lieu of the large-vessel arteries (of volume VA) and veins (of volume VV), with their respective pressures, according to the following equation:
(8)Pβ=Vβ−VβunCβ,where β is “A” or “V”; PV=PCVP; Vβun is the corresponding unstressed volume of “A” or “B” (defined as the nonzero volume whose pressure equals 0 mmHg); Cβ are the compliances.The pressure difference is the numerator of the equation connecting the arterial and venous compartments through a linear resistor, while the denominator is the total peripheral resistanceRTPR. This equation regulates arterio-venous capillary blood flow, i.e., the total volume of blood traversing the entire systemic capillary bed per minute, expressed as follows:
(9)IC=PA−PCVPRTPR.The veno-arterial flow (i.e., cardiac output)ICO represents the total flow generated by the heart per unit time, given by the product of heart rate νHR and stroke volume VS. Equation (1) allows us to express it as follows:
(10)ICO=VED−VES·νHR.Considering conservation of mass (blood volume) at the nodes of a circuit mesh, the arterial and venous volumes over time may be described according to the following differential equations [12]:
(11)dVAdt=ICO−IC,(12)dVVdt=−dVAdt+Iexternal=−dVAdt+Ibleed+Irefill=IC−ICO+Ibleed+Irefill,where Iexternal represents the sum of the two terms, Ibleed and Irefill. In the case of a bleeding vein, for example, the former is the external bleeding rate, whereas the latter is the rate of transcapillary refill (i.e., interstitial fluid migration to the venous compartment).The essential difference between Zenker’s model and ours is that the former lacks any notion of transcapillary refill: this compensatory mechanism commences at the onset of the bleeding and continues until homeostasis is achieved.Notably, blood volume after blood loss is replenished primarily by way of a transcapillary refill. Being a complex homeostatic process, a host of interrelated pathophysiological pathways is triggered. In sum, fluid reserves within the extravascular compartment are mobilized and redistributed in response to hemorrhage. Of note, fluid already present within the body is thus promptly deployed and relocated to correct acute volume deficits of the intravascular compartment [19]. These fluid exchanges occur at the level of the capillary walls as first elucidated by Starling [30].Therefore, we deemed including this key homeostatic mechanism into our model both warranted and necessary. In fact, during severe hemorrhage, its role is anything but negligible. Accordingly, it was included among the key hemodynamic variables at play during hemorrhage so as to provide a more accurate representation to model reality. In our discussion, we have considered only “simple” bleeding (i.e., with minimal injury to tissues).The basis of our modeling of transcapillary refill derives from the pressure differential between central venous and interstitial fluid pressures. The latter is assumed constant and equal to the steady-statePCVP value (PCVP0):
(13)Irefill=kVcap·PCVP0−PCVP,where kVcap is the proportionality constant between the rate of transcapillary and the venous-to-interstitial pressure difference.


### 2.2. Control Model

In the context of cardiovascular homeostasis, baroreflex control of blood pressure is based on the consensus representation of central processing of baroreceptor sensory input, i.e., the combination of a sigmoidal nonlinearity (logistic function) and a linear system [31, 32].Instead of relying on a more complex, albeit physiologically more accurate, interplay of sympathetic and parasympathetic (inhibitory) components, for the sake of simplicity, Zenker et al. reduced baroreflex activity to a net sympathetic (activating) output. Zenker’s single-ventricle model of the heart considers timescales that are orders of magnitude higher than a single beat. Consequently, the linear portion of the baroreflex feedback loop is simplified to display first-order low-pass characteristics, with a time constant commensurate to the least rapid actuator response (i.e., unstressed venous volume control) [12]. Delays attributable to the transmission of baroreflex signaling along neuronal pathways are considered null. Based on these assumptions, the features characterizing stimulatory output of baroreflex central processing, over time, are governed by the following differential equation [12]:
(14)dSEdt=2·π·νcut·S−SE,where the parameter νcut represents the first-order low-pass cut-off frequency (determining the time constant of the baroreflex response) and S is the sympathetic nervous activity.The stimulating outputSEt of the feedback loop affects heart rate (νI^½HR), total peripheral systemic vascular hydraulic resistance (RTPR), myocardial contractility (CPRSW), and unstressed venous volume (VVun) to realign blood pressure in response to deviations from the set point, based on the linear transformations below [12]:
(15)γ=SE·γmax−γmin+γmin,where γ=νHR, RTPR, or CPRSW, and
(16)VVun=1−SE·VVunmax−VVunmin+VVunmin.The formula of Equation (16), in particular, reflects the fact that the venous capacitance vessels contract in response to decreasing blood pressure, thus reducing their unstressed volume.By combining Equations (6), (7), (11), (12), and (14), then including the dependencies relevant to the coupling of the system as explicit terms, we obtain Zenker’s five ODE system [12]:
(17)dVESdt=V~ESVED,VA,SE−VES·νHRSE,(18)dVEDdt=V~EDVES,VV−VED·νHRSE,(19)dVAdt=PAVA−PVVV,SERTPRSE−VED−VES·νHRSE,(20)dVVdt=−dVAdt+Iexternalt,(21)dSEdt=2·π·νcut·S−SE.The stimulatory outputSE is the pivotal control mechanism of homeostasis for the cardiovascular system. It links the individual components together, whereas the coupling between the equations describing cardiac and circulatory activities reflects the cyclical nature of cardiac and circulatory functioning.The dynamics of the system are obtained by solving a system of five ordinary differential equations (17–21). The full list of equations and initial conditions is provided in “Appendix.” Table 1 summarizes all the model variables.Table 1
Model variables.
VariableUnitsMeaningPAmmHgArterial pressureS#Sympathetic nervous activitySE#Stimulating output from baroreflex central processingνHR/minHeart rate in beats per minuteRTPRmmHg·min·L−1Total peripheral/systemic vascular hydraulic resistanceCPRSWmmHgPreload recruitable stroke workVVunLVenous unstressed volume at which the pressure induced by wall tension is 0 mmHgPCVPmmHgCentral venous pressureICL/minArterio-venous capillary blood flowtDiastminDuration of diastoleICOL/minVeno-arterial flow (cardiac output)VALArterial volumeV~ESLCurrent estimate of end-systolic ventricular volumeV~EDLCurrent estimate of end-diastolic ventricular volumePEDmmHgIntraventricular pressure at the end of diastolePESmmHgIntraventricular pressure at the end of systoleVESLEnd-systolic ventricular volumeVEDLEnd-diastolic ventricular volumeIbleedL/minExternal blood withdrawal from the venous compartmentIrefillL/minTranscapillary refilling rateVVLVenous volumeThe model was implemented in C++ (Microsoft Visual Studio 2017 Community Edition), MATLAB (Mathworks MATLAB 2009b), and PHP, using a fixed-step, fourth-order Runge-Kutta numerical integration scheme [33], and is available for simulation on the CNR IASI BioMatLab web platform: http://biomatlab.iasi.cnr.it/models/login.php.


### 2.3. Model Parameters

All model parameters and their meanings are summarized in Table2, whereas Table 3 shows the calibrated parameter sets. In Table 3, the parameters marked with the symbol “†” are constants, whose experimental values are taken from Glower et al. [28]. The parameters marked with “‡” indicate those parameters whose values depend on the physical characteristics of the laboratory animal (swine) considered, while those marked with “∘” are the parameters characterized by the conditions in which the bleeding occurred in the laboratory. The parameters set by the user have this distinctive symbol “⋄,” while the parameters with “★” are the parameters whose values were set to steady-state conditions as the initial conditions (details are shown in the appendix). Finally, the free parameters are indicated with the “∗” symbol. The physiological reference values for the free parameters were taken from Zenker et al. [12].Table 2
Model parameters.
ParameterUnitsMeaningt0minStarting time for numerical integrationtendminFinal time for numerical integrationtdeltaminTime integration steptbleedstartminStarting time of hemorrhagetbleedendminEnd time of hemorrhagekVED0LVentricular volume end-diastolic at zero filling pressureP0LVmmHgPassive empirical ventricular pressurekELV/LConstant characterizing the passive empirical pressure/volume relationshipRvalvemmHg·min·L−1Hydraulic resistance opposing ventricular fillingCAL·mmHg−1Compliance of arterial compartmentCVL·mmHg−1Compliance of venous compartmentVAunLArterial unstressed volume at which the pressure induced by wall tension is 0 mmHgνcut/minFirst-order low-pass cut-off frequency (determining the time constant of the baroreflex response)SsatmmHgDeviation from set point in mmHg where SNA reaches 99% saturation either way (determining the shape and maximal slope of the logistic baroreflex nonlinearity)PAsetmmHgSet point for baroreflex regulation of mean arterial pressureVtotalLTotal blood volumeFwithdrawalLExternal blood withdrawal from the venous compartmentνHRmin/minHeart rate minimum valueνHRmax/minHeart rate maximum valueCPRSWminmmHgPreload recruitable stroke work minimum valueCPRSWmaxmmHgPreload recruitable stroke work maximum valueRTPRminmmHg·min·L−1Total peripheral/systemic vascular hydraulic resistance minimum valueRTPRmaxmmHg·min·L−1Total peripheral/systemic vascular hydraulic resistance maximum valueVVunMinLVenous unstressed volume at which the pressure induced by wall tension is 0 mmHg minimum valueVVunMaxLVenous unstressed volume at which the pressure induced by wall tension is 0 mmHg maximum valueSF#Flag: -1 for closed loop; open reflex otherwisekVcapL/min/mmHgRate of transcapillary refill per mmHg of difference between venous and interstitial pressureVVun0minLVenous unstressed volume at which the pressure induced by wall tension is 0 mmHg minimum initial valueVVun0maxLVenous unstressed volume at which the pressure induced by wall tension is 0 mmHg maximum initial valuePA0mmHgArterial pressure initial valueS0#Sympathetic nervous activity initial valueSE0#Stimulating output from baroreflex central processing initial valueVA0LArterial volume at TzeroVV0LVenous volume at TzeroVVun0LVenous unstressed volume at which the pressure induced by wall tension is 0 mmHg initial valuePCVP0mmHgPressure in the central vein initial valueνHR0max/minMaximum initial value for heart ratetSystminDuration of systole (ventricular contraction period of the cardiac cycle)νHR0/minInitial value for heart ratetDiast0minDuration of diastole, endpoint of filling initial valueCPRSW0mmHgPreload recruitable stroke work initial valueRTPR0mmHg·min·L−1Total peripheral/systemic vascular hydraulic resistance initial valueIC0L·min−1Arterio-venous capillary blood flow initial valueICO0L·min−1Veno-arterial flow (cardiac output) initial valueVES0LEnd-systolic ventricular volume initial valueVED0LEnd-diastolic ventricular volume initial valueV~ES0LEnd-systolic ventricular volume tilde initial valueV~ED0LEnd-diastolic ventricular volume tilde initial valuePED0mmHgEnd-diastolic ventricular pressure initial valuePES0mmHgEnd-systolic ventricular pressure initialIbleed0L·min−1External blood withdrawal from the venous compartment initial valueIrefill0L/minTranscapillary refilling rate initialTable 3
ZenCur model parameter configurations, Figures2–4.
ParameterUnitsSubject 1Subject 2Subject 3Subject 4⋄t0min0000⋄tendmin500500500500⋄tdeltamin0.010.010.010.01∘tbleedstartmin40402533.3∘tbleedendmin73735350†kVED0L0.007144140.007144140.007144140.00714414†P0LVmmHg2.032472.032472.032472.03247†kELV/L65.653165.653165.653165.6531∗RvalvemmHg·min·L−10.04166670.04166670.04166670.0416667∗CAL·mmHg−10.00310.00310.00310.0011∗CVL·mmHg−10.050830.1010.050830.0973∗VAunL0.170720.210.170720.21∗νcut/min0.002520.0001920.00480.000282∗SsatmmHg25252525∗PAsetmmHg68.339380.453369.411973‡VtotalL2.854.292.854.29∘FwithdrawalL0.921.560.961.73∗νHRmin/min01500∗νHRmax/min166166.2170166.2∗CPRSWminmmHg14.50960.50914.50930.509∗CPRSWmaxmmHg130.185.1130.165.1∗RTPRminmmHg·min·L−114.83337.833314.833316.8333∗RTPRmaxmmHg·min·L−119.833330.833319.833318.8∗VVunMinL1.471.91.471.66∗VVunMaxL1.62521.6252.15⋄SF#-1-1-1-1∗kVcapL/min/mmHg2.1e−0501.7e−051e−07★VVun0minL1.471.91.471.66★VVun0maxL1.62521.6252.15★PA0mmHg68.339380.453369.411973★S0#0.50.50.50.5★SE0#0.50.50.50.5★VA0L0.3825720.4594050.3858970.2903★VV0L2.467433.830592.46413.9997★VVun0L1.54751.951.54751.905★PCVP0mmHg18.098118.619818.032721.5283★νHR0max/min166166.2170166.2★tSystmin0.004819280.004813480.004705880.00481348★νHR0/min8390.68583.1★tDiast0min0.007228920.006224050.007058820.00722022★CPRSW0mmHg72.304572.804572.304547.8045★RTPR0mmHg·min·L−117.333319.333317.333317.8166★IC0L·min−12.898533.198292.964192.88897★ICO0L·min−12.898533.198292.964192.88897★VES0L0.007144140.007144140.007144140.00714414★VED0L0.04206620.04244540.0420170.0419091★V~ES0L0.007144140.007144140.007144140.00714414★V~ED0L0.04206620.04244540.0420170.0419091★PED0mmHg18.093218.600518.028217.8867★PES0mmHg0000★Ibleed0L·min−10000★Irefill0L/min0000J#2.03891.73294.34712.6835Jnobase#1.74251.52583.05622.1712Parameters have been estimated through model calibration: specifically, calibration of the vector of target parametersθ was conducted via an algorithm that seeks to minimize loss function (cost function).
(22)θ∈Rvalve,CA,CV,VAun,νcut,Ssat,PAset,νHRmin,νHRmax,CPRSWmin,CPRSWmax,RTPRmin,RTPRmax,VVunmin,VVunmax,kVcap.Optimization was performed using the nonlinear programming solverfminsearch in MATLAB so as to determine minimum values for this objective function:
(23)Jθ=min∑t=1NPAexpt−P∧Asimt,θPAexpt2+νHRexpt−ν∧HRsimt,θνHRexpt2+ICOexpt−I∧COsimt,θICOexpt2,where Xexp(t) is the measurement of the observed variable at time t and the hat symbol indicates the corresponding value simulated by the model, while N is the number of observations over which the normalized sum of squares was computed. The lower the Jθ value, the better the model performance.Sensitivity values of our parameter estimates were calculated, in line with Beard et al. in [34]. Specifically, we computed the relative change in the mean-square error difference between data and model simulations associated with a variation in the parameter value.Assuming thatE is the minimum normalized mean-squared error difference between model prediction and data, then the sensitivity associated with parameter ξ is estimated as
(24)Sθξ≈Eξ+0.1ξ−Eξ0.1.Based on the data in Figures2–4, sensitivities for all parameters identified are listed in Table 4. Computed sensitivity values range from a minimum of 0.002 (for Rvalve) to 3.656 (for VVunMin).Figure 2
Time course of arterial pressure. Model-simulated evolution of arterial pressure for 4 different subjects: the continuous black line represents the ZenCur model forecast; the black dashed line represents the Zenker model forecast, while the blue circles represent the experimental data.Figure 3
Time course of the heart rate. Model-simulated evolution of the heart rate for 4 different subjects: the continuous black line represents the ZenCur model forecast; the black dashed line represents the Zenker model forecast, while the blue circles represent the experimental data.Figure 4
Time course of cardiac output. Model-simulated evolution of cardiac output for 4 different subjects: the continuous black line represents the ZenCur model forecast; the black dashed line represents the Zenker model forecast, while the blue circles represent the experimental data.Table 4
Ranked (most-to-least) sensitivities for the arterial pressurePA, heart rate νHR, and cardiac output ICO with respect to all free parameters.
RankParameterICOPAνHRSensitivity1VVunMin2.2911.3340.0313.6562VVunMax0.2540.0920.0160.3623RTPRmax0.1740.1320.0150.3214PAset0.2140.0520.0420.3085νHRmax0.1670.0330.0660.2666CV0.0930.0370.0180.1487RTPRmin0.0960.0130.0100.1198VAun0.0760.0270.0130.1169CA0.0420.0300.0110.08310νHRmin0.0040.0110.0610.07611νcut0.0240.0100.0050.03912Ssat0.0080.0070.0170.03213kVcap0.0070.0020.0020.01114CPRSWmax0.0030.0050.0020.01015CPRSWmin0.0020.0030.0020.00716Rvalve00.00200.002In our model, as shown in Table4, the parameters with the highest sensitivity rankings are VVunMin and VVunMax: during a hemorrhage (and especially after a hemorrhage without resuscitation), the volume of unstressed venous blood available is the preponderant issue. Indeed, at any given moment, approximately 70% of the systemic blood volume is flowing through veins [35].Accordingly, cardiac output is largely dependent on venous return. This venous reserve plays a major role in maintaining venous pressure during acute volume deficits. Two factors are credited for the venous system ability to compensate for acute hemorrhage: mobilization of unstressed blood volume and changes in venous capacitanceCV[36]. In fact, conversion of unstressed blood volume to stressed blood volume is accompanied by significant reductions in the capacitance of venous vessels throughout the circulatory system [36].In terms of preserving venous pressure, mobilization of unstressed blood volume prevails as the more effective mechanism. During acute hemorrhage of any significance, adequacy of mean filling pressures bolsters venous return and thereby cardiac output [36].Furthermore, hypovolemia prompts immediate activation of baroreceptors located at the level of the carotid artery, aortic arch, left atrium, and pulmonary veins. This activation triggers a reflex arc, resulting in reduced vagal tone, as well as a corresponding increase in norepinephrine release.At the arteriolar level, norepinephrine increases contraction at the precapillary sphincters (mainly of the splanchnic and musculoskeletal vessels) producing a consensual increase in the total peripheral resistanceRTPRmax. This, in turn, is the key factor in maintaining blood pressure constant with respect to reference values (PAset).At the cardiac level, the reduction of parasympathetic tone and the increased release of norepinephrine produce tachycardia. In fact, even theνHRmax parameter has a noteworthy sensitivity in our model.


### 2.4. Experimental Hemorrhagic Shock Protocol

The experimental protocol of hemorrhagic shock in the swine model was conducted in the Institute for Research in Military Medicine (IRMM) of the Faculty of Medicine of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, and the Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps. A total of 4 laboratory animals were used for the development of the current model. In Table5, the mean baseline characteristics of the animals are shown.Table 5
Baseline animals’ characteristics (means±SDs).
Animals’ characteristicsUnitsEvaluated pigsWeightkg46.5±5.9Cardiac outputmL/kg98.7±26.4Heart ratebeats/min86.8±3.5Mean arterial pressuremmHg66.8±11.1Systolic arterial pressuremmHg79.8±9.9Diastolic arterial pressuremmHg54.3±9.4Pulse pressuremmHg25.5±2.5Central venous pressuremmHg7.5±6.4Mean pulmonary arterial pressuremmHg13.5±5.8The animals were fed with standard laboratory chow and kept adequately hydrated with free access to water. Twelve hours before the operative procedures, the animals were deprived of solid food, but their access to water was not limited. The experimental protocol was acute: the animals were bled (35% of total blood volume) and then monitored for up to 7 hours without resuscitation.All animals were euthanized immediately after the operative procedure, strictly applying the international laws for treating animals in experimental model protocols (Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. 1996). Animal care and experimental procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel (MD-13-13751-3).The experiments were performed with the assistance of experienced veterinarians.


### 2.5. Anesthesia, Maintenance, and Materials

Swine were sedated with xylazine (1 mg/kg, IM, Eurovet Animal Health B.V., Bladel, Netherlands) and anesthesia induced with ketamine (10 mg/kg, IM, Vétoquinol S.A., Lure, France). The ear vein was then cannulated for intravenous administration of a mixture of diazepam (2 mg, IV, TEVA Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Jerusalem, Israel), ketamine (400 mg, IV), propofol (1-4 mg/kg, IV, Fresenius Kabi Austria Gmbh, Linz, Austria), and tramadol (5 mg/kg, IM, Rafa Laboratories 294td., Jerusalem, Israel) for analgesia. Cefazolin (1 g, IV, Panpharma S.A., Luitré, France) was given as prophylactic measure. The pigs were then intubated with a cuffed silastic endotracheal tube (7.0 mm, Portex Tracheal Tube, Kent, UK).Anesthesia was maintained with 2% isoflurane (Piramal Critical Care Inc., Bethlehem, PA, USA) in 100% oxygen, and animals were ventilated using controlled mechanical ventilation (Excel 210-SE anesthesia machine m-Datex-Ohmeda Inc., Madison, WI, USA, or Narkomed-2B Anesthesia Machine—North American Drager, Houston, TX, USA). Tidal volume was set to 10 mL/kg with a respiratory rate of 13-15 breaths per minute, adjusted to an end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) of 35 mmHg at baseline.


### 2.6. Surgical Protocol

Each animal was placed in the supine position on the operating table which was covered by warmed blankets and mattress in order to maintain the temperature of each animal at 39°C (±0.5°C).The following vessels were cannulated using a catheter-over-wire technique (Seldinger) with introducers inserted into the vessel (Cordis, Fremont, CA, USA): the left common carotid artery for invasive blood pressure monitoring and heart rate; the right internal jugular vein for venous blood sampling; pulmonary artery catheter placement (Swan-Ganz CCOmbo, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA); the right femoral artery for arterial blood sampling and induction of bleeding. A Tiemann Catheter 12F was placed for collection of urine. Body temperature was monitored rectally. A pulse oximeter was placed on the tongue to measure oxygen saturation. Continuous three-lead ECG monitoring (Marquette, GE Healthcare, Chicago, USA) was obtained using electrodes placed on the animal’s right forelimb, left forelimb, and left hind limb. At the end of the observation period, surviving animals were euthanized by an intravenous injection of KCl solution (Fagron Group BV, Rotterdam, Netherlands). Before bleeding, each animal was weighed to calculate the total circulating blood volume. The amount of blood to be withdrawn represents 30-35% of the estimated blood volume [37].Controlled bleeds, as empirical replications of these complex biological processes, are performed manually by drawing 50 mL aliquots of blood from the right femoral artery via a syringe.The rate of bleeding was monitored continuously, so as to maintain mean arterial pressures (MAP) above 30 mmHg. Whenever MAP dropped below that threshold, blood loss was stopped in order to allow the animal to recover prior to resumption of bleeding.The controlled bleeding was then resumed, filling as many 50 mL syringes as needed until the target volume was reached.One should bear in mind that bleeding is not a linear process. In fact, initially, the rate of hemorrhage is much faster but then tends to wane over time, reflecting the dynamics of an actual trauma with hemorrhage. In the moments following an injury, blood loss is more profuse until a tamponade, vasoconstriction, and other hemostatic mechanisms set in to curb the hemorrhage.The bleeding rate is variable during the procedure: very high at the beginning and gradually diminish. In fact, the bleeding does not have a fixed duration but it varies between 30 and 60 minutes.


## 2.1. Circulatory Model

The foremost role of the heart is to pump blood through the circulatory system, ensuring the transport of fluid, gases, and nutrients throughout the entire system. In the cardiocirculatory model considered, the pump consists of the left chambers of the heart (i.e., atrium plus ventricle).Via a two-phase process, every cardiac cycle ejects a volume of blood into the arterial tree then relaxes. In the first phase, or systole, the ventricle contracts so a fraction of its blood is forcefully ejected through the aortic (outflow) valve into the aorta, once the intraventricular pressure surpasses the aortic pressure. Prerequisite mitral (inflow) valve closure assures unidirectional flow. During the second phase, or diastole, a relatively longer period of ventricular relaxation ensues. The abrupt drop in intraventricular pressure causes the aortic valves to close and the mitral valve to open, such that the ventricle fills with blood.The net volume of blood ejected into the aorta by each systolic contraction is the stroke volume, calculated as follows:(1)VS=VED−VES,in which the stroke volume (VS) is the difference between the end-diastolic volume (VED), when the ventricle is most replete with blood, and the end-systolic volume (VES) after the cardiac contraction, but immediately prior to ventricular relaxation.Assuming that ventricular volume will not usually decrease belowkVED0, we can define V~ES, i.e., the current end-systolic volume, as a function of the end-diastolic volume, as follows [12]:
(2)V~ESVED=maxkVED0,VED−CPRSW·VED−kVED0PA−PED,ifPA>PLVVED=PED,kVED0,otherwise,where kVED0 is the volume at which intraventricular pressure equals 0 mmHg [28], PLV is the ventricular pressure, CPRSW represents the linear relation between stroke work and end-diastolic volume [29], PA is the arterial pressure, and PED is end-diastolic pressure within the ventricle, respectively.The current end-diastolic volumeV~ED as a function of VES can be expressed as follows [12]:
(3)V~EDVES=−1kELV·log−P0LVPCVP+P0LV·e−kELV·kVED0·e−kELV·PCVP+P0LV/Rvalve·tDiast−1++e−kELV·VES+PCVP+P0LV/Rvalve·tDiast,ifPCVP>PLVVES=PES,VES,otherwise,where kELV is a constant characterizing the passive empirical pressure/volume relationship [28], P0LV is the passive empirical ventricular pressure [28], PCVP is the central venous pressure, and PES is the ventricular pressure at end-systolic volume, respectively. In particular, tDiast is the duration of diastole:
(4)tDiast=1νHR−tSyst,where
(5)tSyst=1νHR0max·0.8,where νHR is the heart rate and νHR0max is the maximum initial value for heart rate.The end-systolic ventricular volumeVES is evaluated as [12]
(6)dVESdt=V~ES−VES·νHR.The end-diastolic ventricular volumeVED is described by the following differential equation [12]:
(7)dVEDdt=V~ED−VED·νHR.A simple Windkessel model is used to represent systemic circulation, comprising linear compliancesC in lieu of the large-vessel arteries (of volume VA) and veins (of volume VV), with their respective pressures, according to the following equation:
(8)Pβ=Vβ−VβunCβ,where β is “A” or “V”; PV=PCVP; Vβun is the corresponding unstressed volume of “A” or “B” (defined as the nonzero volume whose pressure equals 0 mmHg); Cβ are the compliances.The pressure difference is the numerator of the equation connecting the arterial and venous compartments through a linear resistor, while the denominator is the total peripheral resistanceRTPR. This equation regulates arterio-venous capillary blood flow, i.e., the total volume of blood traversing the entire systemic capillary bed per minute, expressed as follows:
(9)IC=PA−PCVPRTPR.The veno-arterial flow (i.e., cardiac output)ICO represents the total flow generated by the heart per unit time, given by the product of heart rate νHR and stroke volume VS. Equation (1) allows us to express it as follows:
(10)ICO=VED−VES·νHR.Considering conservation of mass (blood volume) at the nodes of a circuit mesh, the arterial and venous volumes over time may be described according to the following differential equations [12]:
(11)dVAdt=ICO−IC,(12)dVVdt=−dVAdt+Iexternal=−dVAdt+Ibleed+Irefill=IC−ICO+Ibleed+Irefill,where Iexternal represents the sum of the two terms, Ibleed and Irefill. In the case of a bleeding vein, for example, the former is the external bleeding rate, whereas the latter is the rate of transcapillary refill (i.e., interstitial fluid migration to the venous compartment).The essential difference between Zenker’s model and ours is that the former lacks any notion of transcapillary refill: this compensatory mechanism commences at the onset of the bleeding and continues until homeostasis is achieved.Notably, blood volume after blood loss is replenished primarily by way of a transcapillary refill. Being a complex homeostatic process, a host of interrelated pathophysiological pathways is triggered. In sum, fluid reserves within the extravascular compartment are mobilized and redistributed in response to hemorrhage. Of note, fluid already present within the body is thus promptly deployed and relocated to correct acute volume deficits of the intravascular compartment [19]. These fluid exchanges occur at the level of the capillary walls as first elucidated by Starling [30].Therefore, we deemed including this key homeostatic mechanism into our model both warranted and necessary. In fact, during severe hemorrhage, its role is anything but negligible. Accordingly, it was included among the key hemodynamic variables at play during hemorrhage so as to provide a more accurate representation to model reality. In our discussion, we have considered only “simple” bleeding (i.e., with minimal injury to tissues).The basis of our modeling of transcapillary refill derives from the pressure differential between central venous and interstitial fluid pressures. The latter is assumed constant and equal to the steady-statePCVP value (PCVP0):
(13)Irefill=kVcap·PCVP0−PCVP,where kVcap is the proportionality constant between the rate of transcapillary and the venous-to-interstitial pressure difference.


## 2.2. Control Model

In the context of cardiovascular homeostasis, baroreflex control of blood pressure is based on the consensus representation of central processing of baroreceptor sensory input, i.e., the combination of a sigmoidal nonlinearity (logistic function) and a linear system [31, 32].Instead of relying on a more complex, albeit physiologically more accurate, interplay of sympathetic and parasympathetic (inhibitory) components, for the sake of simplicity, Zenker et al. reduced baroreflex activity to a net sympathetic (activating) output. Zenker’s single-ventricle model of the heart considers timescales that are orders of magnitude higher than a single beat. Consequently, the linear portion of the baroreflex feedback loop is simplified to display first-order low-pass characteristics, with a time constant commensurate to the least rapid actuator response (i.e., unstressed venous volume control) [12]. Delays attributable to the transmission of baroreflex signaling along neuronal pathways are considered null. Based on these assumptions, the features characterizing stimulatory output of baroreflex central processing, over time, are governed by the following differential equation [12]:
(14)dSEdt=2·π·νcut·S−SE,where the parameter νcut represents the first-order low-pass cut-off frequency (determining the time constant of the baroreflex response) and S is the sympathetic nervous activity.The stimulating outputSEt of the feedback loop affects heart rate (νI^½HR), total peripheral systemic vascular hydraulic resistance (RTPR), myocardial contractility (CPRSW), and unstressed venous volume (VVun) to realign blood pressure in response to deviations from the set point, based on the linear transformations below [12]:
(15)γ=SE·γmax−γmin+γmin,where γ=νHR, RTPR, or CPRSW, and
(16)VVun=1−SE·VVunmax−VVunmin+VVunmin.The formula of Equation (16), in particular, reflects the fact that the venous capacitance vessels contract in response to decreasing blood pressure, thus reducing their unstressed volume.By combining Equations (6), (7), (11), (12), and (14), then including the dependencies relevant to the coupling of the system as explicit terms, we obtain Zenker’s five ODE system [12]:
(17)dVESdt=V~ESVED,VA,SE−VES·νHRSE,(18)dVEDdt=V~EDVES,VV−VED·νHRSE,(19)dVAdt=PAVA−PVVV,SERTPRSE−VED−VES·νHRSE,(20)dVVdt=−dVAdt+Iexternalt,(21)dSEdt=2·π·νcut·S−SE.The stimulatory outputSE is the pivotal control mechanism of homeostasis for the cardiovascular system. It links the individual components together, whereas the coupling between the equations describing cardiac and circulatory activities reflects the cyclical nature of cardiac and circulatory functioning.The dynamics of the system are obtained by solving a system of five ordinary differential equations (17–21). The full list of equations and initial conditions is provided in “Appendix.” Table 1 summarizes all the model variables.Table 1
Model variables.
VariableUnitsMeaningPAmmHgArterial pressureS#Sympathetic nervous activitySE#Stimulating output from baroreflex central processingνHR/minHeart rate in beats per minuteRTPRmmHg·min·L−1Total peripheral/systemic vascular hydraulic resistanceCPRSWmmHgPreload recruitable stroke workVVunLVenous unstressed volume at which the pressure induced by wall tension is 0 mmHgPCVPmmHgCentral venous pressureICL/minArterio-venous capillary blood flowtDiastminDuration of diastoleICOL/minVeno-arterial flow (cardiac output)VALArterial volumeV~ESLCurrent estimate of end-systolic ventricular volumeV~EDLCurrent estimate of end-diastolic ventricular volumePEDmmHgIntraventricular pressure at the end of diastolePESmmHgIntraventricular pressure at the end of systoleVESLEnd-systolic ventricular volumeVEDLEnd-diastolic ventricular volumeIbleedL/minExternal blood withdrawal from the venous compartmentIrefillL/minTranscapillary refilling rateVVLVenous volumeThe model was implemented in C++ (Microsoft Visual Studio 2017 Community Edition), MATLAB (Mathworks MATLAB 2009b), and PHP, using a fixed-step, fourth-order Runge-Kutta numerical integration scheme [33], and is available for simulation on the CNR IASI BioMatLab web platform: http://biomatlab.iasi.cnr.it/models/login.php.


## 2.3. Model Parameters

All model parameters and their meanings are summarized in Table2, whereas Table 3 shows the calibrated parameter sets. In Table 3, the parameters marked with the symbol “†” are constants, whose experimental values are taken from Glower et al. [28]. The parameters marked with “‡” indicate those parameters whose values depend on the physical characteristics of the laboratory animal (swine) considered, while those marked with “∘” are the parameters characterized by the conditions in which the bleeding occurred in the laboratory. The parameters set by the user have this distinctive symbol “⋄,” while the parameters with “★” are the parameters whose values were set to steady-state conditions as the initial conditions (details are shown in the appendix). Finally, the free parameters are indicated with the “∗” symbol. The physiological reference values for the free parameters were taken from Zenker et al. [12].Table 2
Model parameters.
ParameterUnitsMeaningt0minStarting time for numerical integrationtendminFinal time for numerical integrationtdeltaminTime integration steptbleedstartminStarting time of hemorrhagetbleedendminEnd time of hemorrhagekVED0LVentricular volume end-diastolic at zero filling pressureP0LVmmHgPassive empirical ventricular pressurekELV/LConstant characterizing the passive empirical pressure/volume relationshipRvalvemmHg·min·L−1Hydraulic resistance opposing ventricular fillingCAL·mmHg−1Compliance of arterial compartmentCVL·mmHg−1Compliance of venous compartmentVAunLArterial unstressed volume at which the pressure induced by wall tension is 0 mmHgνcut/minFirst-order low-pass cut-off frequency (determining the time constant of the baroreflex response)SsatmmHgDeviation from set point in mmHg where SNA reaches 99% saturation either way (determining the shape and maximal slope of the logistic baroreflex nonlinearity)PAsetmmHgSet point for baroreflex regulation of mean arterial pressureVtotalLTotal blood volumeFwithdrawalLExternal blood withdrawal from the venous compartmentνHRmin/minHeart rate minimum valueνHRmax/minHeart rate maximum valueCPRSWminmmHgPreload recruitable stroke work minimum valueCPRSWmaxmmHgPreload recruitable stroke work maximum valueRTPRminmmHg·min·L−1Total peripheral/systemic vascular hydraulic resistance minimum valueRTPRmaxmmHg·min·L−1Total peripheral/systemic vascular hydraulic resistance maximum valueVVunMinLVenous unstressed volume at which the pressure induced by wall tension is 0 mmHg minimum valueVVunMaxLVenous unstressed volume at which the pressure induced by wall tension is 0 mmHg maximum valueSF#Flag: -1 for closed loop; open reflex otherwisekVcapL/min/mmHgRate of transcapillary refill per mmHg of difference between venous and interstitial pressureVVun0minLVenous unstressed volume at which the pressure induced by wall tension is 0 mmHg minimum initial valueVVun0maxLVenous unstressed volume at which the pressure induced by wall tension is 0 mmHg maximum initial valuePA0mmHgArterial pressure initial valueS0#Sympathetic nervous activity initial valueSE0#Stimulating output from baroreflex central processing initial valueVA0LArterial volume at TzeroVV0LVenous volume at TzeroVVun0LVenous unstressed volume at which the pressure induced by wall tension is 0 mmHg initial valuePCVP0mmHgPressure in the central vein initial valueνHR0max/minMaximum initial value for heart ratetSystminDuration of systole (ventricular contraction period of the cardiac cycle)νHR0/minInitial value for heart ratetDiast0minDuration of diastole, endpoint of filling initial valueCPRSW0mmHgPreload recruitable stroke work initial valueRTPR0mmHg·min·L−1Total peripheral/systemic vascular hydraulic resistance initial valueIC0L·min−1Arterio-venous capillary blood flow initial valueICO0L·min−1Veno-arterial flow (cardiac output) initial valueVES0LEnd-systolic ventricular volume initial valueVED0LEnd-diastolic ventricular volume initial valueV~ES0LEnd-systolic ventricular volume tilde initial valueV~ED0LEnd-diastolic ventricular volume tilde initial valuePED0mmHgEnd-diastolic ventricular pressure initial valuePES0mmHgEnd-systolic ventricular pressure initialIbleed0L·min−1External blood withdrawal from the venous compartment initial valueIrefill0L/minTranscapillary refilling rate initialTable 3
ZenCur model parameter configurations, Figures2–4.
ParameterUnitsSubject 1Subject 2Subject 3Subject 4⋄t0min0000⋄tendmin500500500500⋄tdeltamin0.010.010.010.01∘tbleedstartmin40402533.3∘tbleedendmin73735350†kVED0L0.007144140.007144140.007144140.00714414†P0LVmmHg2.032472.032472.032472.03247†kELV/L65.653165.653165.653165.6531∗RvalvemmHg·min·L−10.04166670.04166670.04166670.0416667∗CAL·mmHg−10.00310.00310.00310.0011∗CVL·mmHg−10.050830.1010.050830.0973∗VAunL0.170720.210.170720.21∗νcut/min0.002520.0001920.00480.000282∗SsatmmHg25252525∗PAsetmmHg68.339380.453369.411973‡VtotalL2.854.292.854.29∘FwithdrawalL0.921.560.961.73∗νHRmin/min01500∗νHRmax/min166166.2170166.2∗CPRSWminmmHg14.50960.50914.50930.509∗CPRSWmaxmmHg130.185.1130.165.1∗RTPRminmmHg·min·L−114.83337.833314.833316.8333∗RTPRmaxmmHg·min·L−119.833330.833319.833318.8∗VVunMinL1.471.91.471.66∗VVunMaxL1.62521.6252.15⋄SF#-1-1-1-1∗kVcapL/min/mmHg2.1e−0501.7e−051e−07★VVun0minL1.471.91.471.66★VVun0maxL1.62521.6252.15★PA0mmHg68.339380.453369.411973★S0#0.50.50.50.5★SE0#0.50.50.50.5★VA0L0.3825720.4594050.3858970.2903★VV0L2.467433.830592.46413.9997★VVun0L1.54751.951.54751.905★PCVP0mmHg18.098118.619818.032721.5283★νHR0max/min166166.2170166.2★tSystmin0.004819280.004813480.004705880.00481348★νHR0/min8390.68583.1★tDiast0min0.007228920.006224050.007058820.00722022★CPRSW0mmHg72.304572.804572.304547.8045★RTPR0mmHg·min·L−117.333319.333317.333317.8166★IC0L·min−12.898533.198292.964192.88897★ICO0L·min−12.898533.198292.964192.88897★VES0L0.007144140.007144140.007144140.00714414★VED0L0.04206620.04244540.0420170.0419091★V~ES0L0.007144140.007144140.007144140.00714414★V~ED0L0.04206620.04244540.0420170.0419091★PED0mmHg18.093218.600518.028217.8867★PES0mmHg0000★Ibleed0L·min−10000★Irefill0L/min0000J#2.03891.73294.34712.6835Jnobase#1.74251.52583.05622.1712Parameters have been estimated through model calibration: specifically, calibration of the vector of target parametersθ was conducted via an algorithm that seeks to minimize loss function (cost function).
(22)θ∈Rvalve,CA,CV,VAun,νcut,Ssat,PAset,νHRmin,νHRmax,CPRSWmin,CPRSWmax,RTPRmin,RTPRmax,VVunmin,VVunmax,kVcap.Optimization was performed using the nonlinear programming solverfminsearch in MATLAB so as to determine minimum values for this objective function:
(23)Jθ=min∑t=1NPAexpt−P∧Asimt,θPAexpt2+νHRexpt−ν∧HRsimt,θνHRexpt2+ICOexpt−I∧COsimt,θICOexpt2,where Xexp(t) is the measurement of the observed variable at time t and the hat symbol indicates the corresponding value simulated by the model, while N is the number of observations over which the normalized sum of squares was computed. The lower the Jθ value, the better the model performance.Sensitivity values of our parameter estimates were calculated, in line with Beard et al. in [34]. Specifically, we computed the relative change in the mean-square error difference between data and model simulations associated with a variation in the parameter value.Assuming thatE is the minimum normalized mean-squared error difference between model prediction and data, then the sensitivity associated with parameter ξ is estimated as
(24)Sθξ≈Eξ+0.1ξ−Eξ0.1.Based on the data in Figures2–4, sensitivities for all parameters identified are listed in Table 4. Computed sensitivity values range from a minimum of 0.002 (for Rvalve) to 3.656 (for VVunMin).Figure 2
Time course of arterial pressure. Model-simulated evolution of arterial pressure for 4 different subjects: the continuous black line represents the ZenCur model forecast; the black dashed line represents the Zenker model forecast, while the blue circles represent the experimental data.Figure 3
Time course of the heart rate. Model-simulated evolution of the heart rate for 4 different subjects: the continuous black line represents the ZenCur model forecast; the black dashed line represents the Zenker model forecast, while the blue circles represent the experimental data.Figure 4
Time course of cardiac output. Model-simulated evolution of cardiac output for 4 different subjects: the continuous black line represents the ZenCur model forecast; the black dashed line represents the Zenker model forecast, while the blue circles represent the experimental data.Table 4
Ranked (most-to-least) sensitivities for the arterial pressurePA, heart rate νHR, and cardiac output ICO with respect to all free parameters.
RankParameterICOPAνHRSensitivity1VVunMin2.2911.3340.0313.6562VVunMax0.2540.0920.0160.3623RTPRmax0.1740.1320.0150.3214PAset0.2140.0520.0420.3085νHRmax0.1670.0330.0660.2666CV0.0930.0370.0180.1487RTPRmin0.0960.0130.0100.1198VAun0.0760.0270.0130.1169CA0.0420.0300.0110.08310νHRmin0.0040.0110.0610.07611νcut0.0240.0100.0050.03912Ssat0.0080.0070.0170.03213kVcap0.0070.0020.0020.01114CPRSWmax0.0030.0050.0020.01015CPRSWmin0.0020.0030.0020.00716Rvalve00.00200.002In our model, as shown in Table4, the parameters with the highest sensitivity rankings are VVunMin and VVunMax: during a hemorrhage (and especially after a hemorrhage without resuscitation), the volume of unstressed venous blood available is the preponderant issue. Indeed, at any given moment, approximately 70% of the systemic blood volume is flowing through veins [35].Accordingly, cardiac output is largely dependent on venous return. This venous reserve plays a major role in maintaining venous pressure during acute volume deficits. Two factors are credited for the venous system ability to compensate for acute hemorrhage: mobilization of unstressed blood volume and changes in venous capacitanceCV[36]. In fact, conversion of unstressed blood volume to stressed blood volume is accompanied by significant reductions in the capacitance of venous vessels throughout the circulatory system [36].In terms of preserving venous pressure, mobilization of unstressed blood volume prevails as the more effective mechanism. During acute hemorrhage of any significance, adequacy of mean filling pressures bolsters venous return and thereby cardiac output [36].Furthermore, hypovolemia prompts immediate activation of baroreceptors located at the level of the carotid artery, aortic arch, left atrium, and pulmonary veins. This activation triggers a reflex arc, resulting in reduced vagal tone, as well as a corresponding increase in norepinephrine release.At the arteriolar level, norepinephrine increases contraction at the precapillary sphincters (mainly of the splanchnic and musculoskeletal vessels) producing a consensual increase in the total peripheral resistanceRTPRmax. This, in turn, is the key factor in maintaining blood pressure constant with respect to reference values (PAset).At the cardiac level, the reduction of parasympathetic tone and the increased release of norepinephrine produce tachycardia. In fact, even theνHRmax parameter has a noteworthy sensitivity in our model.


## 2.4. Experimental Hemorrhagic Shock Protocol

The experimental protocol of hemorrhagic shock in the swine model was conducted in the Institute for Research in Military Medicine (IRMM) of the Faculty of Medicine of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, and the Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps. A total of 4 laboratory animals were used for the development of the current model. In Table5, the mean baseline characteristics of the animals are shown.Table 5
Baseline animals’ characteristics (means±SDs).
Animals’ characteristicsUnitsEvaluated pigsWeightkg46.5±5.9Cardiac outputmL/kg98.7±26.4Heart ratebeats/min86.8±3.5Mean arterial pressuremmHg66.8±11.1Systolic arterial pressuremmHg79.8±9.9Diastolic arterial pressuremmHg54.3±9.4Pulse pressuremmHg25.5±2.5Central venous pressuremmHg7.5±6.4Mean pulmonary arterial pressuremmHg13.5±5.8The animals were fed with standard laboratory chow and kept adequately hydrated with free access to water. Twelve hours before the operative procedures, the animals were deprived of solid food, but their access to water was not limited. The experimental protocol was acute: the animals were bled (35% of total blood volume) and then monitored for up to 7 hours without resuscitation.All animals were euthanized immediately after the operative procedure, strictly applying the international laws for treating animals in experimental model protocols (Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. 1996). Animal care and experimental procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel (MD-13-13751-3).The experiments were performed with the assistance of experienced veterinarians.


## 2.5. Anesthesia, Maintenance, and Materials

Swine were sedated with xylazine (1 mg/kg, IM, Eurovet Animal Health B.V., Bladel, Netherlands) and anesthesia induced with ketamine (10 mg/kg, IM, Vétoquinol S.A., Lure, France). The ear vein was then cannulated for intravenous administration of a mixture of diazepam (2 mg, IV, TEVA Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Jerusalem, Israel), ketamine (400 mg, IV), propofol (1-4 mg/kg, IV, Fresenius Kabi Austria Gmbh, Linz, Austria), and tramadol (5 mg/kg, IM, Rafa Laboratories 294td., Jerusalem, Israel) for analgesia. Cefazolin (1 g, IV, Panpharma S.A., Luitré, France) was given as prophylactic measure. The pigs were then intubated with a cuffed silastic endotracheal tube (7.0 mm, Portex Tracheal Tube, Kent, UK).Anesthesia was maintained with 2% isoflurane (Piramal Critical Care Inc., Bethlehem, PA, USA) in 100% oxygen, and animals were ventilated using controlled mechanical ventilation (Excel 210-SE anesthesia machine m-Datex-Ohmeda Inc., Madison, WI, USA, or Narkomed-2B Anesthesia Machine—North American Drager, Houston, TX, USA). Tidal volume was set to 10 mL/kg with a respiratory rate of 13-15 breaths per minute, adjusted to an end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) of 35 mmHg at baseline.


## 2.6. Surgical Protocol

Each animal was placed in the supine position on the operating table which was covered by warmed blankets and mattress in order to maintain the temperature of each animal at 39°C (±0.5°C).The following vessels were cannulated using a catheter-over-wire technique (Seldinger) with introducers inserted into the vessel (Cordis, Fremont, CA, USA): the left common carotid artery for invasive blood pressure monitoring and heart rate; the right internal jugular vein for venous blood sampling; pulmonary artery catheter placement (Swan-Ganz CCOmbo, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA); the right femoral artery for arterial blood sampling and induction of bleeding. A Tiemann Catheter 12F was placed for collection of urine. Body temperature was monitored rectally. A pulse oximeter was placed on the tongue to measure oxygen saturation. Continuous three-lead ECG monitoring (Marquette, GE Healthcare, Chicago, USA) was obtained using electrodes placed on the animal’s right forelimb, left forelimb, and left hind limb. At the end of the observation period, surviving animals were euthanized by an intravenous injection of KCl solution (Fagron Group BV, Rotterdam, Netherlands). Before bleeding, each animal was weighed to calculate the total circulating blood volume. The amount of blood to be withdrawn represents 30-35% of the estimated blood volume [37].Controlled bleeds, as empirical replications of these complex biological processes, are performed manually by drawing 50 mL aliquots of blood from the right femoral artery via a syringe.The rate of bleeding was monitored continuously, so as to maintain mean arterial pressures (MAP) above 30 mmHg. Whenever MAP dropped below that threshold, blood loss was stopped in order to allow the animal to recover prior to resumption of bleeding.The controlled bleeding was then resumed, filling as many 50 mL syringes as needed until the target volume was reached.One should bear in mind that bleeding is not a linear process. In fact, initially, the rate of hemorrhage is much faster but then tends to wane over time, reflecting the dynamics of an actual trauma with hemorrhage. In the moments following an injury, blood loss is more profuse until a tamponade, vasoconstriction, and other hemostatic mechanisms set in to curb the hemorrhage.The bleeding rate is variable during the procedure: very high at the beginning and gradually diminish. In fact, the bleeding does not have a fixed duration but it varies between 30 and 60 minutes.


## 3. Results

An accurate, reliable mathematical model, calibrated using animal studies, would be of great benefit for the assessment of the likelihood of patient survival in relation to the severity of the traumatic insult and hence provide valuable information regarding the urgency of transport for definitive care.We determined our approach to simulating the complex responses of the cardiovascular system to hemorrhage after a comprehensive literature search and evaluation of existing mathematical modeling techniques relevant to the cardiovascular domain. Our approach was to first determine the hemodynamic effects of bleeding in the absence of fluid resuscitation and then establish a reference time range for survival prior to massive transfusion.The current model can be characterized as a simplified, ordinary differential-equation model of the cardiovascular system. As such, it can be utilized to quantitatively analyze and simulate systemic responses to clinically significant variations in blood volume and intravascular fluids typically occurring during hemorrhage. The rationale and design of the model were based on pursuing an acceptable trade-off between complexity (i.e., physiological fidelity) and alignment with the empirical data. The parameters of the model were calibrated based on hemodynamic measurements in experimental animal studies. The model fit in the 4 test animals and simulations conducted thus far have proven the model to also perform correctly, in qualitative terms, with regard to the targeted, clinically relevant, physiological responses of three hemodynamic variables simultaneously.Now, we describe the evolution of key physiological variables comparing the ZenCur model to that of Zenker: mean arterial pressurePA, heart rate νHR, and cardiac output ICO that are depicted in Figures 2–4, respectively. In this figure, the data refer to 4 separate laboratory swine (subjects 1 to 4), which underwent controlled hemorrhage. The black continuous curves plot the time course of the ZenCur model forecast. The black dashed curves plot the time course of the Zenker model forecast. The blue circles are the corresponding experimental values.The curves of the predictive model were determined by parameter calibration for each animal. The calibrated parameters are summarized in Table3 (for the Zenker model, as there is no transcapillary refill mechanism, the kVcap parameter is set to zero). Clearly, with the reported values of these parameters, the model equations reflected all forecasted time courses simultaneously. We can distinguish three defined areas in the diagram: the baseline prior to hemorrhage, hemorrhage, and post-hemorrhage phases (the duration of hemorrhage corresponds to the red-shaded area). The total duration of the experiments for each animal was about 500 minutes.Taking into consideration Figure2, relative to arterial pressure, we note that as soon as bleeding begins, the curves of both models fall rapidly and then rise again with a progressively accentuated slope when bleeding is interrupted. We can see that the curves of the Zenker model have a less pronounced slope in the post-bleeding phase. During bleeding, the forecast from the models and the experimental data are in agreement for all 4 subjects under examination. However, the fit of the ZenCur model is best during the post-hemorrhage phase in subjects 1 and 3, which show a recovery of blood pressure values that mirror the experimental data rather closely. On the contrary, in subjects 2 and 4, despite a careful calibration of the parameters, the model drifts away from the time course of variable PA. The latter presents a rather irregular behavior in these subjects with respect to these 2 swine.The temporal evolution of theνHR heart rate for the 4 subjects under examination (Figure 3) shows how the response to hemorrhage can follow two different patterns: one characterizing subjects 1 and 3 and the other, subjects 2 and 4. The models follow both patterns. In particular, the patterns for swine 1 and 3 show a sudden rise at the beginning of the bleeding and then drop after bleeding. In swine 2 and 4, the time courses of heart rate have a linear evolution increasing over time after the onset of hemorrhage. In these two subjects, the curves do not rise suddenly, but rather gradually, up to the end of the period of observation.The last physiological variable for which we compare the predictions of the two models and observations is cardiac output (ICO, Figure 4). The trend is similar to that seen for arterial pressure. Throughout the hemorrhage, there is a rapid drop in CO, both for theoretical predictions and the experimental data. At the end of the hemorrhage, there is an absolute minimum point followed by recovery for subjects 1 and 3 that stabilizes around 3 L/min. Instead, for the other 2 animals (2 and 4), we have, at first, an immediate rise in the curve followed by a slow decrease starting from minute 400.We observe that the CO curves of the ZenCur model for the 4 subjects fit the experimental data with greater precision than the curves of the Zenker model.As shown in almost every graph plotting hemodynamic variable data, there is a margin of deviation between simulation values (solid black line) and the corresponding experimental values that all fall within the initial baseline time intervals.This is attributable to an irregular fluctuation of the experimental data at the beginning of the sample survey since it is assumed that the person to be hemorrhaged maintains steady-state hemodynamic values before blood sampling (in accordance with our simulation).Unfortunately, this difference between the hemodynamic values simulated by the model and the experimental data is heavily reflected on the value of the cost function which undergoes an unjustified increase in the value.The values of the cost functionJ are shown at the bottom of Table 3, where Jnobase represents the value of J calculated in the absence of the experimental points of the baseline. The greatest difference between the two values is found in the case of subject 3.


## 4. Discussion

When compared to the experimental data in our possession, our model predicts, fairly well, the time courses of the hemodynamic variables considered in each of the three phases that characterize the hemorrhagic event: baseline, hemorrhagic, and post-hemorrhagic.Despite existing limitations (such as the confounding effects of anesthesia, an anything but complete representation of baroreflex control, and relatively small number of subjects), we believe it, nevertheless, captures many of the main features of acute hemorrhage and may provide new insights into the complex interactions of the process.We deem these results partly due to the introduction of the homeostatic mechanism of transcapillary refill, which encapsulates the innovation of our model with respect to Zenker’s. By integrating this compensatory mechanism into our model, we simulated the temporal trend of all hemodynamic variables with greater precision and, in particular, significantly improved forecasting regarding the post-hemorrhagic phase: without taking transcapillary refill into account, Zenker’s model generated unreliable predictions in the post-hemorrhagic phase, thus justifying the change.According to classical theory, the mechanism of transcapillary refill, which governs the net movement of fluid and extracellular protein from the interstitial compartment into the intravascular compartment, is described by the Starling equation [19].However, as an evolution of the original concept by Hu and Weinbaum [38], Levick and Michel [14] subsequently proposed the so-called “Revised Starling Principle” (RSP).The Starling principle explains the movement of fluid between blood and interstitia as a result of hydrostatic- and colloid-osmotic (oncotic) pressure differentials across the capillary membrane [15]. In contrast, the RSP recognizes that a balance of pressures cannot halt fluid exchange, given that microvessels are semipermeable to macromolecules. As such, true Starling equilibria cannot occur, but rather steady states are maintained at some finite, albeit low, level of filtration within most tissues [15].The traditional Starling principle thus needed revision due to insights into the role of interstitial fluid (ISF) pressures, also acknowledging the functional properties of the endothelial glycocalyx as a semipermeable barrier [14].The revised Starling equation and the glycocalyx model represent an improved paradigm in the management of intravenous fluid therapy in clinical situations, according to various scholars [39, 40].For other scholars [16], however, the hypothesis still deserves thorough clinical validation. In particular, these authors argue against “the Extension of Starling’s Principle” [15], based on the purported role of “the endothelial glycocalyx layer, which moves the oncotic gradient from being between the plasma and the interstitium to between the plasma and a virtually protein-free space between the glycocalyx and the endothelial cell membrane, which dramatically changes the prerequisites for fluid absorption from tissue to plasma [16].”According to Hahn et al. [16], moreover, many experimental and clinical observations in humans fail to fully support these novel proposals for microcirculation. The key issue concerns the role of the glycocalyx in the Revised Starling Principle in terms of effective reabsorption of fluid, on the part of skeletal muscle, when capillary filtration pressure acutely diminishes.Therefore, the homeostatic mechanism of transcapillary refill remains controversial and the RSP appears weak (not only in the opinion of Hahn et al. [16], but ours as well) since it essentially concerns steady-state conditions: the cardiovascular system, as a complex system, is arguably dynamic nonetheless [16].Flow motion via vasomotion is a phenomenon that occurs instant by instant, through a dynamic equilibrium, and therefore must be duly considered in order to understand clinical observations in humans [16].Given the dynamic nature of vasomotion, we deem the classic Starling principle more accurate and, thus, opted to adopt it for our model. Furthermore, in the light of the results obtained by comparing the predictions of our model with experimental data, we consider the transcapillary refill (even if modeled primarily by hydraulic pressure differences) an important and non-negligible element.Moreover, one should bear in mind that, due to compensatory mechanisms, assessing bleeding patients is challenging because current clinical tools lack sensitivity in that they measure vital signs that remain stable during the early stages of bleeding. Consequently, there is a need to understand and assess whole systems that incorporate compensatory mechanisms for reduced circulating blood volume and how these interact over time with ongoing hemorrhage [41].More accurate predictions of the temporal evolution in the variability of vital signs, such as mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and cardiac output, enable earlier diagnosis of traumatic hemorrhagic shock, thereby increasing the likelihood of timely treatment and a more favorable outcome for the patient. Although several models for predicting critical bleeding do exist, none however have been deemed sufficiently accurate to dictate treatment [42].Among the models for predicting hemorrhagic shock, a number of these, like ours, examine the relationship between blood loss and clinical signs in order to detect it at an early stage, prior to the onset of full-blown shock. In their recent systematic reviews, Pacagnella et al. [43] and Olaussen et al. [42] outline the various available models and report on their performances and validation.More recently, Chen et al. [44] proposed a hemorrhage identification model using non-invasive vital signs. Vital signs remain the most important predictors of hemorrhagic shock before admittance to hospitals, such as on the battlefield, at the scene of terrorist acts or motor vehicle accidents.Furthermore, HR, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and MAP allow one to calculate the so-called shock index (SI), i.e., the HR/SBP ratio, and the modified SI (MSI), which is the HR/MAP ratio. These are by far the most sensitive markers of hypoperfusion and strong predictors of outcome.With elevations of the SI above 0.9, the risk of recurring to MT in trauma patients rises substantially [45]. As soon as SI surpasses 0.9, the risk doubles; it increases fivefold for SI>1.1 and is 7 times higher for SI>1.3 [45]. SI is an easily measured hemodynamic indicator of instability [46–48] used to triage hypovolemic shock upon arrival at the emergency department (ED), in terms of transfusion requirements and hemostatic resuscitation [49].However, in a recent large prospective study of 9,860 adult trauma patients, MSI (>1.3 or <0.7) was a better predictor of mortality than conventional SI, implying that mean, rather than systolic, BP is what ensures tissue perfusion [50].Given the fact that our model also simulates the performance of HR and MAP, it too proves itself capable of predicting hemorrhagic shock, representing a useful option in the assessment of MT requirements, based on MSI, for traumatized patients.


### 4.1. Limitations of the Current Work

The model, in its current configuration, is inadequate for simulating baroreflex mechanisms. Further study is necessary in order to expand the algorithm to be able to account for effects of variations in stress scenarios on baroreflex responses.Another, albeit intentional, limitation of the current work is the relative simplicity of the representation of the vascular circuit.The introduction of a more sophisticated mathematical structure, perhaps including the pulmonary circulation, while offering a better representation, would however overburden the computational calculation times, at the expense of (non-negligible) delays in output.An important limitation consists in not having used conscious swine: the anesthetics used during the implementation of porcine hemorrhage models for the hemorrhagic shock undoubtedly introduce some confounding effects. In particular, isoflurane (used by us) is an anesthetic that attenuates transcapillary refill after both normotensive and hypotensive hemorrhage [51].Intuitively, the rationale for administering anesthetic agents is to spare lab animals unnecessary pain when surgical procedures are required for a study, as is often the case. Such uses are not only warranted but also mandated, according to established ethical protocols recognized internationally for the use of animal models in any experimental setting [20].As regards future research, the criteria for selecting anesthetic agents will favor those having minimal physiologic effects on normal compensatory responses to blood loss as we pursue further validation of the model. As of yet, the model has only been tested (with encouraging results) on a small cohort of 4 laboratory swine, but it is clear that subsequent validation will imply larger cohorts in order to produce more quantitatively representative results, as well as increasingly closer to the conscious threshold.


## 4.1. Limitations of the Current Work

The model, in its current configuration, is inadequate for simulating baroreflex mechanisms. Further study is necessary in order to expand the algorithm to be able to account for effects of variations in stress scenarios on baroreflex responses.Another, albeit intentional, limitation of the current work is the relative simplicity of the representation of the vascular circuit.The introduction of a more sophisticated mathematical structure, perhaps including the pulmonary circulation, while offering a better representation, would however overburden the computational calculation times, at the expense of (non-negligible) delays in output.An important limitation consists in not having used conscious swine: the anesthetics used during the implementation of porcine hemorrhage models for the hemorrhagic shock undoubtedly introduce some confounding effects. In particular, isoflurane (used by us) is an anesthetic that attenuates transcapillary refill after both normotensive and hypotensive hemorrhage [51].Intuitively, the rationale for administering anesthetic agents is to spare lab animals unnecessary pain when surgical procedures are required for a study, as is often the case. Such uses are not only warranted but also mandated, according to established ethical protocols recognized internationally for the use of animal models in any experimental setting [20].As regards future research, the criteria for selecting anesthetic agents will favor those having minimal physiologic effects on normal compensatory responses to blood loss as we pursue further validation of the model. As of yet, the model has only been tested (with encouraging results) on a small cohort of 4 laboratory swine, but it is clear that subsequent validation will imply larger cohorts in order to produce more quantitatively representative results, as well as increasingly closer to the conscious threshold.


## 5. Conclusion

In the current study, we introduce an upgrade of Zenker’s model, dubbed the ZenCur model. While maintaining the mathematical structure of the original model, ours also integrates the homeostatic mechanism of transcapillary refill, a fundamental compensatory mechanism during bleeding.The addition of this “component” enhances the performance of the system, while maintaining the relative simplicity of the model. Comparisons between our model and the experimental data from 4 laboratory animals (swine) subjected to controlled hemorrhage allowed us to establish that the ZenCur model was able to acceptably simulate the curves of the three hemodynamic variables of interest, i.e., mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and cardiac output, in the context of severe bleeding.The purpose of our study was to develop a simple and effective tool that is able to predict hemorrhagic shock in traumatized patients in a timely manner: by calculating the MSI index (which is the ratio HR/MAP), we have a highly valuable marker to predict mortality, which significantly outperforms HR, SBP, DBP, or SI alone [52].In clinical practice, in addition to predicting survival, our system also allows us to determine the best timing of MT for the individual patient.Upon further validation in larger cohorts, the ZenCur model has the potential of a novel, user-friendly decision-making tool. The foreseeable applications might include various scenarios such as emergency care for motor vehicle accidents, for natural disasters, or on the battlefield, once integrated into dedicated (and portable) devices that facilitate triage in the field.



---

*Source: 7936895-2020-12-28.xml*