# Methotrexate and Cyclosporine Treatments Modify  the Activities of Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV and Prolyl Oligopeptidase in Murine Macrophages

Authors: R. A. Olivo; N. G. Nascimento; C. F. P. Teixeira; P. F. Silveira
Journal: Clinical and Developmental Immunology
 (2008)

---

## Abstract

Analysis of the effects of cyclosporine A (25–28mgkg−1) and/or methotrexate (0.1 mgkg−1) treatments on dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV) and prolyl oligopeptidase (POP) activities and on algesic response in two distinct status of murine macrophages (Mφs) was undertaken. In resident Mφs, DPPIV and POP were affected by neither individual nor combined treatments. In thioglycolate-elicited Mφs, methotrexate increased DPPIV (99–110%) and POP (60%), while cyclosporine inhibited POP (21%). Combined treatment with both drugs promoted a rise (51–84%) of both enzyme activities. Only cyclosporine decreased (42%) the tolerance to algesic stimulus. Methotrexate was revealed to exert prevalent action over that of cyclosporine on proinflammatory Mφ POP. The opposite effects of methotrexate and cyclosporine on POP activity might influence the availability of the nociceptive mediators bradykinin and substance P in proinflammatory Mφs. The exacerbated response to thermally induced algesia observed in cyclosporine-treated animals could be related to upregulation of those mediators.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Macrophage (Mϕ) is considered the main effector cell type of
the immune system. Under stimulation, this cell is activated by a process
involving morphological, biochemical, and functional changes [1]. Among the relevant enzyme activities on Mϕ functions are the membrane-bound (M) and
soluble (S) dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP IV) and the S prolyl oligopeptidase
(POP) [2]. DPPIV cleaves substance P [3] and inflammatory mediators such as
interferon-gamma (IFNγ),
chemokines and proinflammatory cytokines [4], while POP cleaves the nociceptive
mediators bradykinin and substance P [5]. During inflammation, nonneuronal
cells such as Mϕ produce a variety of chemical
mediators that can act on nociceptive neurons [6]. On the other hand, nociceptive
mediators such as bradykinin [7, 8]
and substance P [9, 10] act on the immune response and Mϕ functions.Methotrexate (MTX) and cyclosporine (CsA) are
immunomodulators that belong to the most commonly used group of drugs for
cytotoxic therapy. However, their exact mechanisms of
action are not yet clarified. Although
MTX and CsA have been used alone [11] or in a combined therapy [12] for
inflammatory and painful chronic disease treatments,
experimental and clinical studies are needed to determine the extent to which
MTX and CsA treatments affect the Mϕ functions and, more specifically, its
peptidases with hydrolytic ability on inflammatory and nociceptive mediators.
It is known that Mϕs functions are unchanged or reduced in the
presence of CsA. The reduction includes in vitro interleukin-1 generation [13],
chemotaxis [14], prostaglandin E2 production [15], procoagulant
activity [16], and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) [17] and inducible
nitric oxide synthase [18] expressions. CsA also reduces phorbol 12-myristate
13-acetate-dependent superoxide anion and H2O2 production
in vitro by resident (RE) murine Mϕs, which are abolished when Mϕs are in the proinflammatory state [19]. MTX,
but not CsA, is able to enhance in vitro spreading of murine peritoneal Mϕs [20]. MTX is also known to inhibit production
of cytokines induced by T-cell activation. Interleukin (IL)-4, IL-13, IFN
gamma, tumor
necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) and
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor are among the cytokines
inhibited by MTX [21].The ex vivo isolated RE and thioglycollate broth medium-elicited (TGE) Mϕ models mimic, respectively, the in vivo basal
and proinflammatory status of this cell. The proinflammatory Mϕs are present in acute and chronic inflammation
as major players in the generation and release of a variety of inflammatory and
nociceptive mediators. A
possible relationship between the ex vivo TGE Mϕ DPPIV and POP activity levels with the in vivo
excitability to thermal pain stimulus could highlight the in vivo role of these
peptidases through their actions on those inflammatory and nociceptive mediators after their generation and release
by Mϕs in inflammatory and painful diseases. This
study aims to analyze the interference of
MTX and CsA, each one daily administered alone or combined during 21 days, on
the activity levels of S DPPIV and POP, and MDPPIV in two distinct status of ex
vivo isolated peritoneal murine Mϕs—the noninflammatory RE and the proinflammatory TGE cells—as well as
whether the excitability to thermal pain stimulus could be altered by these
drugs or correlated to Mϕ status and peptidase activities.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Animals and Treatments

Healthy Swiss strain mice, males, weighing 18–20 g, were
maintained in a restricted-access room with controlled temperature of 25°C, relative humidity of
65.3±0.9%, and 12 h light:12 h dark photoperiod (lights on at 6:00 am), and
were housed in cages (inside length × width × height of 56×35×19 cm) with a maximum
of 20 mice per cage, with food and tap water ad libitum.Animals were subcutaneously (s.c.) injected,
once a day, with 50 μL of cyclosporine A (CsA) (10 mg CsA/mL ricine oil (starting
dose: 25–28 mg/kg BW) or
of ricine oil (control), during 21 days. Other groups were administered by gavage (p.o.) of 0.2 mL, once a day, with methotrexate (MTX) dissolved in saline 0.9% (starting dose: 0.1 mg/kg BW) or with saline (control), during 21 days. A
fourth group and its corresponding control were simultaneously submitted to
treatments with both drugs and both vehicles, respectively, in the same scheme as described above. Subsequently, Mϕs were collected from individuals of each group
(treated and controls
of MTX and/or CsA). The regimen of treatment with MTX [22] and/or CsA [23] used in this study was chosen by its well-known
immunosuppressive effect.The animal and research protocols used in this
study are in agreement with the Brazilian Council Directive (COBEA-BRAZIL)
and were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Instituto Butantan.


### 2.2. Hot-Plate Nociceptive Test

This test was employed based on the method of
Jacob and Ramabadran [24]. Mice were placed on a metal surface kept at 64.5°C±0.5°C. Results are expressed as the latency
time to the observed licking of both anterior feet (latency of response).


### 2.3. Obtention of RE and TGE Macrophages

The peritoneal lavage was performed in half of
each group (treated and controls of MTX and/or CsA) after a gentle massage of the abdominal
wall. Then, the peritoneal fluid, containing Mϕs, was collected. Aliquots of the washes were
used to determine the total number of peritoneal cells in a Neubauer’s chamber after dilution (1:20, v/v) in Turk solution (0.002 g gentian violet in 500 mL 3%
acetic acid). The predominance of mononuclear cells in the washes was confirmed
by light microscopic analysis of smears stained with Hema3. The cell
population consisted in proximally 99% of Mϕs, as determined by morphological criteria.
Washes were then centrifuged at 200 Xg,
6 minutes, 22°C, and the pellet obtained resuspended in 2.0 mL of 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4.The other half of each group was also submitted
to peritoneal lavage, which was performed, according to the above description,
4 days after IP administration of 1.0 mL of 3% thioglycollate broth medium
(TG). The cell population in the washes of these TG-treated mice consisted of
more than 95% of Mϕs, as determined by morphological criteria.The number of obtained Mϕs from peritoneal lavage was about 4×106/mL
in TG-treated (TGE-Mϕs) and about 1×106/mL in mice that are not treated with
TG (RE Mϕs). There were no differences in Mϕ number among groups treated with MTX and/or
CsA and/or vehicles.All animals
were killed under halothane and exsanguinated
immediately before these procedures.


### 2.4. Preparation of the Soluble (S) and Solubilized Membrane-Bound (M) Fractions

Mϕ suspensions in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4
were sonicated at room temperature at amplitude 40 for 10 seconds. Sonicated Mϕs were then ultracentrifuged (Hitachi model
HIMAC CP60E) at 165000 X g for 35 minutes.
The resulting supernatants were used to measure the S enzyme activities and
protein concentrations. To avoid contamination with the S, the resulting pellet
was washed three times with 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4. The pellet was then
homogenized for 30 seconds at 800 rpm (Contrac pestle mixer, FANEN, Brazil) in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4,
plus 0.1% Triton X-100 and ultracentrifuged at 165000 X g for 35 minutes. The supernatants obtained were used to determine
the M enzyme activities and protein concentrations. All steps were carried out
at 4°C.As a marker for the fractionation procedure,
LDH activity was determined spectrophotometrically at 340 nm [25] in the S and
M fractions of Mϕs from all
treated and control groups. Briefly, samples of 30 uL of S and M from Mϕs were incubated
with 270 uL of 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 200 mM NaCl and 1.6 mM sodium pyruvate
solution plus 0.2 mM nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, reduced form (NADH) disodium salt. Values of
LDH activity were obtained by the results of subtraction of the absorbance at
340 nm read at 10 minutes from that read at 0 time of incubation at 37°C, and extrapolated by
comparison with a standard curve of NADH. Student’s t-test was performed
to compare the results of LDH between S and M
fractions. The levels of LDH activity were similar to those previously
reported [2], being higher in S than in M fractions (data not shown), which
confirmed the efficiency of the adopted fractionation procedure. Moreover,
these levels were not altered by MTX and/or CsA and/or vehicles treatments
(data not shown).


### 2.5. Protein

Protein concentrations were
measured in 40-uL samples at 630 nm by Bradford [26] method using Bio-Rad
protein assay kit. Absorbance was read using the Bio-Tek Power Wave X® spectrophotometer. Protein contents were extrapolated by
comparison with respective standard curves of bovine serum albumin (BSA).


### 2.6. Peptidase Assays

Peptidase activities were quantified on
the basis of the amount of 4-methoxy-β-naphthylamine (for DPPIV) or β-naphthylamine (for POP) released as a result
of the enzymatic activity of undiluted 50-uL samples of the S or M fractions
from Mϕs incubated at
37°C for 30 minutes in 96-well flat botton microplates (Corning Inc., USA) with
250 uL of each respective prewarmed substrate solution diluted to 0.2 mM (DPPIV) or 0.125 mM (POP) in
corresponding 0.05 M buffers containing BSA 0.1 mg/mL. β-Naphthylamine or 4-methoxy-β-naphthylamine were estimated fluorometrically
using the Bio-Tek FL600FA Microplate Fluorescence/Absorbance Reader, at 460/40 nm emission wavelength and 360/40 nm excitation wavelength in triplicate
samples. The value of incubates at zero time (blank) was subtracted and the
relative fluorescence was converted to picomoles of 4-methoxy-β-naphthylamine or β-naphthylamine by comparison with a
correspondent standard curve. Peptidase activity was expressed as picomoles of
substrate hydrolyzed per minute (UP) per milligram of protein.
Assays were linear with respect to time of hydrolysis and protein content.
DPPIV activity was measured by the method of Liu and Hansen [27] using
H-Gly-Pro-4-methoxy-β-naphthylamide in Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.3. POP
activity was measured by the method of Zolfaghari et al. [28] using
Z-Gly-Pro-β-naphthylamide in phosphate buffer, pH 7.4,
with 2 mM dithiothreitol
(DTT), without or with different
concentrations of  Z-Pro-Pro-OH
(Z-pro-prolinal).


### 2.7. Materials

Commercially available cyclosporine A (Sandimmun®,
Novartis, Brazil), methotrexate (Metrexato®, Blaüsiegel, Brazil), ricine oil (Sidepal, Brazil), Bio-Rad protein
assay kit (Hercules, USA),
Gly-Pro-4-methoxy-β-naphthylamide
(Peninsula, USA), Z-Gly-Pro-β-naphthylamide,
Z-Pro-Pro-OH (Bachem, USA) and Hema3
(Fisher Sci, USA). Bovine serum
albumin, β-naphthylamine,
gentian violet (crystal violet), halothane, 4-methoxy-β-naphthylamine,
dithiothreitol, nicotinamide adenine
dinucleotide, reduced form, disodium salt and sodium pyruvate were
from Sigma, USA. All other reagents of analytical grade were from Merck, Brazil.


### 2.8. Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed statistically using
GraphPad Prism® and Instat® softwares. Regression
analyses were performed to obtain standard
curves. Analysis of variance, ANOVA, was performed to compare values of the
same enzyme activity from S or M among control groups, and to compare the
values of POP activity under different concentrations of Z-pro-prolinal
inhibitor. It was followed by student-newman-keuls test (SNK) when differences
were detected. Student’s t-test was performed to compare the values of
the same parameters between RE and TGE Mϕs in each control group or between control and
MTX- and/or CsA-treated animals on day 21, and to compare the values of latency
of response-induced algesia between control and MTX- and/or CsA-treated animals
along the treatments. Differences were considered statistically significant at
a minimum level of P<.05.


## 2.1. Animals and Treatments

Healthy Swiss strain mice, males, weighing 18–20 g, were
maintained in a restricted-access room with controlled temperature of 25°C, relative humidity of
65.3±0.9%, and 12 h light:12 h dark photoperiod (lights on at 6:00 am), and
were housed in cages (inside length × width × height of 56×35×19 cm) with a maximum
of 20 mice per cage, with food and tap water ad libitum.Animals were subcutaneously (s.c.) injected,
once a day, with 50 μL of cyclosporine A (CsA) (10 mg CsA/mL ricine oil (starting
dose: 25–28 mg/kg BW) or
of ricine oil (control), during 21 days. Other groups were administered by gavage (p.o.) of 0.2 mL, once a day, with methotrexate (MTX) dissolved in saline 0.9% (starting dose: 0.1 mg/kg BW) or with saline (control), during 21 days. A
fourth group and its corresponding control were simultaneously submitted to
treatments with both drugs and both vehicles, respectively, in the same scheme as described above. Subsequently, Mϕs were collected from individuals of each group
(treated and controls
of MTX and/or CsA). The regimen of treatment with MTX [22] and/or CsA [23] used in this study was chosen by its well-known
immunosuppressive effect.The animal and research protocols used in this
study are in agreement with the Brazilian Council Directive (COBEA-BRAZIL)
and were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Instituto Butantan.


## 2.2. Hot-Plate Nociceptive Test

This test was employed based on the method of
Jacob and Ramabadran [24]. Mice were placed on a metal surface kept at 64.5°C±0.5°C. Results are expressed as the latency
time to the observed licking of both anterior feet (latency of response).


## 2.3. Obtention of RE and TGE Macrophages

The peritoneal lavage was performed in half of
each group (treated and controls of MTX and/or CsA) after a gentle massage of the abdominal
wall. Then, the peritoneal fluid, containing Mϕs, was collected. Aliquots of the washes were
used to determine the total number of peritoneal cells in a Neubauer’s chamber after dilution (1:20, v/v) in Turk solution (0.002 g gentian violet in 500 mL 3%
acetic acid). The predominance of mononuclear cells in the washes was confirmed
by light microscopic analysis of smears stained with Hema3. The cell
population consisted in proximally 99% of Mϕs, as determined by morphological criteria.
Washes were then centrifuged at 200 Xg,
6 minutes, 22°C, and the pellet obtained resuspended in 2.0 mL of 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4.The other half of each group was also submitted
to peritoneal lavage, which was performed, according to the above description,
4 days after IP administration of 1.0 mL of 3% thioglycollate broth medium
(TG). The cell population in the washes of these TG-treated mice consisted of
more than 95% of Mϕs, as determined by morphological criteria.The number of obtained Mϕs from peritoneal lavage was about 4×106/mL
in TG-treated (TGE-Mϕs) and about 1×106/mL in mice that are not treated with
TG (RE Mϕs). There were no differences in Mϕ number among groups treated with MTX and/or
CsA and/or vehicles.All animals
were killed under halothane and exsanguinated
immediately before these procedures.


## 2.4. Preparation of the Soluble (S) and Solubilized Membrane-Bound (M) Fractions

Mϕ suspensions in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4
were sonicated at room temperature at amplitude 40 for 10 seconds. Sonicated Mϕs were then ultracentrifuged (Hitachi model
HIMAC CP60E) at 165000 X g for 35 minutes.
The resulting supernatants were used to measure the S enzyme activities and
protein concentrations. To avoid contamination with the S, the resulting pellet
was washed three times with 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4. The pellet was then
homogenized for 30 seconds at 800 rpm (Contrac pestle mixer, FANEN, Brazil) in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4,
plus 0.1% Triton X-100 and ultracentrifuged at 165000 X g for 35 minutes. The supernatants obtained were used to determine
the M enzyme activities and protein concentrations. All steps were carried out
at 4°C.As a marker for the fractionation procedure,
LDH activity was determined spectrophotometrically at 340 nm [25] in the S and
M fractions of Mϕs from all
treated and control groups. Briefly, samples of 30 uL of S and M from Mϕs were incubated
with 270 uL of 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 200 mM NaCl and 1.6 mM sodium pyruvate
solution plus 0.2 mM nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, reduced form (NADH) disodium salt. Values of
LDH activity were obtained by the results of subtraction of the absorbance at
340 nm read at 10 minutes from that read at 0 time of incubation at 37°C, and extrapolated by
comparison with a standard curve of NADH. Student’s t-test was performed
to compare the results of LDH between S and M
fractions. The levels of LDH activity were similar to those previously
reported [2], being higher in S than in M fractions (data not shown), which
confirmed the efficiency of the adopted fractionation procedure. Moreover,
these levels were not altered by MTX and/or CsA and/or vehicles treatments
(data not shown).


## 2.5. Protein

Protein concentrations were
measured in 40-uL samples at 630 nm by Bradford [26] method using Bio-Rad
protein assay kit. Absorbance was read using the Bio-Tek Power Wave X® spectrophotometer. Protein contents were extrapolated by
comparison with respective standard curves of bovine serum albumin (BSA).


## 2.6. Peptidase Assays

Peptidase activities were quantified on
the basis of the amount of 4-methoxy-β-naphthylamine (for DPPIV) or β-naphthylamine (for POP) released as a result
of the enzymatic activity of undiluted 50-uL samples of the S or M fractions
from Mϕs incubated at
37°C for 30 minutes in 96-well flat botton microplates (Corning Inc., USA) with
250 uL of each respective prewarmed substrate solution diluted to 0.2 mM (DPPIV) or 0.125 mM (POP) in
corresponding 0.05 M buffers containing BSA 0.1 mg/mL. β-Naphthylamine or 4-methoxy-β-naphthylamine were estimated fluorometrically
using the Bio-Tek FL600FA Microplate Fluorescence/Absorbance Reader, at 460/40 nm emission wavelength and 360/40 nm excitation wavelength in triplicate
samples. The value of incubates at zero time (blank) was subtracted and the
relative fluorescence was converted to picomoles of 4-methoxy-β-naphthylamine or β-naphthylamine by comparison with a
correspondent standard curve. Peptidase activity was expressed as picomoles of
substrate hydrolyzed per minute (UP) per milligram of protein.
Assays were linear with respect to time of hydrolysis and protein content.
DPPIV activity was measured by the method of Liu and Hansen [27] using
H-Gly-Pro-4-methoxy-β-naphthylamide in Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.3. POP
activity was measured by the method of Zolfaghari et al. [28] using
Z-Gly-Pro-β-naphthylamide in phosphate buffer, pH 7.4,
with 2 mM dithiothreitol
(DTT), without or with different
concentrations of  Z-Pro-Pro-OH
(Z-pro-prolinal).


## 2.7. Materials

Commercially available cyclosporine A (Sandimmun®,
Novartis, Brazil), methotrexate (Metrexato®, Blaüsiegel, Brazil), ricine oil (Sidepal, Brazil), Bio-Rad protein
assay kit (Hercules, USA),
Gly-Pro-4-methoxy-β-naphthylamide
(Peninsula, USA), Z-Gly-Pro-β-naphthylamide,
Z-Pro-Pro-OH (Bachem, USA) and Hema3
(Fisher Sci, USA). Bovine serum
albumin, β-naphthylamine,
gentian violet (crystal violet), halothane, 4-methoxy-β-naphthylamine,
dithiothreitol, nicotinamide adenine
dinucleotide, reduced form, disodium salt and sodium pyruvate were
from Sigma, USA. All other reagents of analytical grade were from Merck, Brazil.


## 2.8. Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed statistically using
GraphPad Prism® and Instat® softwares. Regression
analyses were performed to obtain standard
curves. Analysis of variance, ANOVA, was performed to compare values of the
same enzyme activity from S or M among control groups, and to compare the
values of POP activity under different concentrations of Z-pro-prolinal
inhibitor. It was followed by student-newman-keuls test (SNK) when differences
were detected. Student’s t-test was performed to compare the values of
the same parameters between RE and TGE Mϕs in each control group or between control and
MTX- and/or CsA-treated animals on day 21, and to compare the values of latency
of response-induced algesia between control and MTX- and/or CsA-treated animals
along the treatments. Differences were considered statistically significant at
a minimum level of P<.05.


## 3. Results

Table1 shows the peptidase activity
levels of S and M fractions from RE and TGE Mϕs of different
controls. Saline per oral (p.o.) produced 1.5 to 2.5-fold reduction in soluble DPPIV and POP activities of TGE
Mϕs when compared
to ricine oil s.c. or to ricine oil s.c. plus saline (p.o.). Membrane-bound
DPPIV activity in TGE Mϕs was also
4.8-fold lower after saline p.o. than after ricine oil plus saline treatment,
which in this turn was 3.2-fold higher than after ricine oil s.c. administered
alone. In RE Mϕs, activity
levels of both soluble DPPIV and POP obtained
after all schemes of vehicle administration did not vary significantly, while
membrane-bound DPPIV was about 5-fold higher after ricine oil plus saline
treatment than ricine oil or saline administered alone. Comparisons between RE
and TGE Mϕs in each regimen
of vehicle administration also revealed that soluble DPPIV activity of TGE Mϕs was about
2-fold lower than RE Mϕs from animals
that received saline p.o. treatment. Membrane-bound DPPIV activity of TGE Mϕs was 1.7-fold
lower than RE Mϕs from animals
that received treatment with combined vehicles. Ricine oil s.c. or saline p.o
administered alone produced a drop between 1.3 to 2.1 on POP activity levels of
TGE Mϕs compared to RE
Mϕs.Table 1
Dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV) and prolyl oligopeptidase (POP) activities in soluble (S)
and membrane-bound (M) fractions of resident (RE) and thioglycollate-elicited
(TGE) macrophages from vehicle-treated animals (ricine oil s.c.= controls of
cyclosporine; saline p.o.= controls of methotrexate; ricine oil s.c. plus saline
p.o.= controls of methotrexate plus cyclosporine).
VehicleEnzymeActivity (UP/mg protein)SMRETGERETGERicine oilDPPIV334±42359±53*112±7112±26Saline391±67174±35a145±4373±12Ricine oil + saline319±23357±13**605±50***355±53***bRicine oilPOP278±16200±10**cabsentSaline286±44133±8babsentRicine oil + saline320±23343±18***absentUP= picomoles substrate hydrolyzed per minute. Values are means ± SEM from 5 animals (assays made in
triplicate). Comparisons among vehicle treatments regarding the same enzyme
activity in each fraction and macrophage status (analysis of variance, ANOVA,
followed by SNK test):P<.05*, P<.01** versus saline; P<.001***
versus saline or ricine oil. Comparisons between TGE versus RE related to the
same enzyme activity in each fraction and vehicle treatment (unpaired two-sided
Student’s t-test): P<.03a, P<.01b, P<.005c.DPPIV activity of Mϕs was previously
demonstrated to be inhibited by diprotin A, a classical inhibitor of the
canonical DPPIV [2]. Since POP activity of Mϕs was
surprisingly inhibited by classical aminopeptidase inhibitors [2], its
susceptibility to a classical POP inhibitor, Z-pro-prolinal, was checked in the
present study. As shown in Figure 1, POP activity of Mϕs was inhibited
(58–91%) by
Z-pro-prolinal at the employed concentrations (1 to 50×10−4M).Figure 1
Effect of
Z-pro-prolinal on soluble prolyl oligopeptidase activity of
thioglycollate-elicited murine macrophages. The values (means ± SEM from 5 animals) were recorded in
triplicate as the percentage of inhibition relative to control reactions
(enzyme activity = 100%, percentage of inhibition = 0) which run simultaneously in
absence of Z-pro-prolinal. All concentrations of Z-pro-prolinal produced lower
levels of enzyme activity when compared to the control (unpaired two-sided
Student'st-test, P<.05). P<.05*
in comparison to 5×10−4 M or 25×10−4 M; P<.001** in comparison to all other concentrations
of Z-pro-prolinal (analysis of variance, ANOVA, followed by SNK test).As shown in Figure2, administration of
vehicles, or MTX, or MTX plus CsA produced a similar reaction time to that of
the thermal stimulus. On day 21, the administration of CsA
alone decreased 0.58-fold of the reaction time when compared to the
values obtained after the treatment with the combined vehicles.Figure 2
Latency of
response-induced algesia of mice treated with methotrexate (MTX) and/or
cyclosporine (CsA), or with ricine oil plus saline (control). Values are means ± SEM from 10–14 animals.P<.001* in comparison to control (unpaired two-sided
Student's t-test).Figure3 shows
that MTX treatment resulted in a significant rise of soluble activity levels of
DPPIV (2.1-fold) and POP (1.6-fold) in the TGE Mϕs when compared
to those observed after the treatment with the respective vehicle. MTX
treatment also resulted in a significant rise in membrane-bound DPPIV activity
levels (2-fold) in TGE Mϕs when compared
to those observed after treatment with its respective vehicle (see Figure 3).Percentual
activity of soluble and membrane-bound dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV) and
prolyl oligopeptidase (POP) activities in resident and thioglycollate-elicited
murine macrophages from methotrexate-treated in relation to their respective
controls (100%). Values are means ± SEM from 5 animals (assays made in
triplicate).P<.001* in comparison to
control (unpaired two-sided
Student's t-test).
(a)(b)Figure4 shows that CsA treatment
resulted in a drop of POP activity levels (0.79-fold) in the TGE
Mϕs when compared
to those observed after the treatment with the respective vehicle. However, CsA
treatment did not change the activity levels of soluble or membrane-bound DPPIV
when compared to those observed after the treatment with the respective vehicle
(see Figure 4).Percentual
activity of soluble and membrane-bound dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV) and
prolyl oligopeptidase (POP) activities in resident and thioglycollate-elicited
murine macrophages from cyclosporine-treated in relation to the respective
control (100%). Values are means ± SEM from 5 animals (assays made in
triplicate).P<.05* in comparison to control (unpaired
two-sided Student's t-test).
(a)(b)As shown in Figure5, combined treatment
with MTX and CsA promoted an increase in activity levels of soluble (1.5-fold)
and membrane-bound (1.8-fold) DPPIV and soluble POP (1.8-fold) in the TGE Mϕs when compared
to those observed after treatment with the combined vehicles.Percentual
activity of soluble and membrane-bound dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV) and
prolyl oligopeptidase (POP) activities in resident and thioglycollate-elicited
murine macrophages from methotrexate plus cyclosporine-treated in relation to
the respective control (100%). Values are means ± SEM from 5 animals (assays made in
triplicate).P<.001* in comparison to control (unpaired two-sided Student's t-test).
(a)(b)Figure4 shows that CsA treatment
resulted in a drop of POP activity levels (0.79-fold) in the TGE
Mϕs when compared
to those observed after the treatment with the respective vehicle. However, CsA
treatment did not change the activity levels of soluble or membrane-bound DPPIV
when compared to those observed after the treatment with the respective vehicle
(see Figure 4).


## 4. Discussion

The intraperitoneal injection of TG increased about four
times the obtained Mϕ number from all
treatment groups (MTX and/or CsA and/or vehicles), after 4 days. However, the
expression of enzyme activity adopted in the present study might not be
correlated to cell number, since it was normalized by mg of protein in the cell homogenates, that
is, enzyme activity = picomoles substrate hydrolyzed per mg of protein. As expected we
detected stress-induced effects of adopted administration regimens on the
activity levels of examined Mϕ peptidases. It is well-known that in
response to certain physical stressors the release of neuropeptides from
sensory nerves is increased, mainly substance P (or other inflammatory mediators), and
in this turn, these neuropeptides promote the activation of Mϕs
[29]. It is noteworthy that DPPIV and POP
presented higher activity levels in S and/or M fractions of RE and TGE Mϕs from mice submitted
to chronic s.c. (ricine oil treatment) and/or p.o. (saline treatment)
administrations than those obtained without these stress stimuli [2]. However,
in relation to s.c. regimen or to RE Mϕs, inducible stress
by p.o. regimen reduced the increment of peptidase
activities in TGE Mϕs. Overall, apart from these variations among
different controls adopted in the present study, we
elucidate that the regimen of MTX and/or CsA treatments differentially affected
DPPIV and POP activities of murine Mϕs, an effect that only occurred under elicited
(or proinflammatory) status of these cells. The
effect of MTX on DPPIV activity of proinflammatory TGE Mϕs but not on RE Mϕs suggested that DPPIV activity is
relevant to the immunosuppressor/anti-inflammatory actions of MTX. MTX and
CsA had opposite effects on POP activity of TGE Mϕs, suggesting a drop of hydrolytic activity of
TGE Mϕ POP on pain mediators. Since TGE Mϕs are a model of proinflammatory Mϕs and these cells are abundant in inflammatory
processes, and the
nervous system influences the peripheral inflammatory process, it is
conceivable that the reduction of POP activity participates in the development
of algesic hyperexcitability in CsA therapy. However, this algesic
hyperexcitability could be attributed to an effect on the nervous system
through which CsA treatment exacerbates the reaction to this stimulus. In this
case, the altered reaction to acute thermal algesic stimulus might have an
indirect participation of Mϕs.Changes on the activity levels of DPPIV-like
enzyme(s) in TGE Mϕs due to MTX treatment were particularly relevant, as
these might participate within the pharmacological action of MTX through an
increased ability of this cell to inactivate several susceptible substrates known to be inflammatory and/or immunological
mediators. However, since MTX increased DPPIV
activity in TGE Mϕs but did not modify the reaction to the algesic
stimulus, it is likely that this reaction is not related to an increased
hydrolysis of substance P by this enzyme. Alternatively, only the reduction of
DPPIV activity below a critical level, as observed here for POP activity of
TGE Mϕs from mice treated with CsA, could be related to hyperalgesia.
DPPIV-like enzyme(s) exert
different functions regarding cell type and intra- or extracellular conditions
in which they are expressed [30], and they have
been recognized as multifunctional proteins similar to the lymphocyte surface glycoprotein CD26 (EC 3.4.14.5). DPPIV activity was
detected in Mϕs [2] and only recently the
subcellular fractionation of other leukocyte types has localized the
preponderance of DPP8/9 protein to the cytosol and canonical EC 3.4.14.5 in the
membrane fractions [31]. Based on that study, we can speculate that DPPIV
activity in the soluble fraction of murine Mϕs seems improbable to be EC
3.4.14.5, but most likely DPP8/9, although the classical DPPIV inhibitor
diprotin A was effective to decrease the DPPIV activity in both S and M
fractions of these cells [2]. Furthermore, since these activities have not been
purified from murine Mϕs, it remains to be investigated
whether the changes in the DPPIV
activity observed in the present study are accompanied by corresponding changes
in the respective protein or mRNA expression. In general, these proline-specific dipeptidyl peptidases are
unique among the aminopeptidases because of their superimposed ability to
liberate Xaa-Pro and less efficiently Xaa-Ala dipeptides from the N-terminus of
regulatory peptides. DPPIV-like enzymes act on peptide degradation (e.g.,
peptide hormone, various cytokines and growth factors), amino acid scavenging,
cell-to-cell communication, signal transduction
and adhesion, and as a receptor as well [30]. Recently, we have reported that CsA has no effect on basic and neutral
aminopeptidase activities of TGE Mϕs [32]. Here we evidenced that CsA has also no
effect on DPPIV activity, but produced a reduction on POP activity levels in
the proinflammatory model of TGE Mϕs. POP is known as postproline cleaving enzyme
activity, TRH-deaminase activity, or kininase B activity. The link between POP
enzyme and inflammatory or autoimmune syndromes has been evidenced in some
studies. In a mouse model of systemic lupus erythematosus, POP activity is
increased in the spleen of diseased subjects when compared to controls. This
increase is progressive with age and indicates that POP plays an important role
in the immunopathological disturbances associated with this syndrome
[33, 34]. Other links between POP and immunological
disturbances were made when increased POP levels in synovial membrane
preparations from patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis were observed
and it is also suggested that POP may play a significant role in the onset of
osteoarthrosis [35, 36]. POP cleaves Pro-Xaa bonds in peptides that consist of
an acyl-Yaa-Pro-Xaa sequence as found in nociceptive mediators such as bradykinin and substance P [37, 38], which can
also be considered a link between inflammation and pain. It has been reported
that aberrant pain perception and depressive symptoms in fibromyalgia are
related to lower serum POP activity [39]. On the other hand, literature data
about effects of CsA on nociception are controversial. Acute administration of
CsA has been reported to reduce corticotropin-releasing factor-induced
peripheral antinociception through effects on opioid-containing immune cells
[40]. Headache symptoms in patients receiving CsA for organ transplantation
have been connected with an endothelial dysfunction related to increased production
of nitric oxide [41]. CsA has also been implicated in severe leg pain in
patients with psoriatic arthritis [42]. Conversely, acute administration of CsA
has been reported to induce an antinociceptive effect that involves the
L-arginine-oxid nitric pathway, which is not mediated by opioid receptors [43],
and also reduced inflammatory joint hyperalgesia in rat adjuvant-induced
arthritis [44]. Moreover, it was reported that CsA can induce antinociception
and increased plasma levels of met-enkephalin [45]. A possible explanation for
these contraditory findings is that analgesic or algesic actions and their
intensities vary according to prevalent cell types and mechanisms related to
different pain stimuli and/or therapy regimen with CsA. Processes of sensitization
(spontaneous pain and augmented pain response on noxious stimulation, and pain
on normally nonpainful stimulation) are common in chronic peripheral
inflammatory process such as arthritis, which has been currently treated with
MTX and/or CsA [46–49]. This
sensitization seems to involve bradykinin binding to nerve fibers receptors,
while the expression of these receptors is upregulated during inflammation. In
this turn, substance P promotes subsequent central sensitization to that
produced by glutamate on spinal cord neurons [50]. However, at nerve fiber
receptor level, the control of these mediators by enzymatic cleavage has not
been investigated. Taken together, literature data, the effectiveness of
immunosuppressive response to CsA on day 21 [23], and our data showing
concomitant reduction of TGE Mϕ POP activity and tolerance to thermally-induced algesia by CsA, suggest a
relationship between the observed effects of CsA on these proinflammatory cells
and on the availability of bradykinin and/or substance P at receptor level of
nerve fibers. Since MTX or MTX plus CsA increased POP activity but did not
change the reaction to the same algesic stimulus, it is likely that besides POP
activity other pain mediators are altered by the adopted treatment with CsA.
Alternatively, only the reduction of POP activity below a critical level, as
demonstrated here in the proinflammatory model of murine Mϕs, could be related to hyperalgesia. It is also conceivable that murine Mϕ POP can potentially be a novel POP enzyme,
since POP activity in murine Mϕs was inhibited by classical aminopeptidase
inhibitors [2] and, as demonstrated in the present study, by the classical POP
inhibitor Z-pro-prolinal, at well-known effective concentrations [51].
Furthermore, residual Z-pro-prolinal-resistant
POP activity in Mϕs and in bovine serum could be similar [51]. To
clarify these points, the identification of Mϕ POP protein and the effects on algesia using a
selective inhibitor of Mϕ POP activity need further investigations.In conclusion,
our data indicate the participation of two representative prolyl peptidases
in  murine Mϕs within the effects of MTX and/or CsA
treatment, and provide scope for additional studies on
the mechanism of action and efficacy of individual or combined therapy
with both drugs in painful and inflammatory diseases.



---

*Source: 794050-2008-02-25.xml*