# T m-Shift Detection of Dog-DerivedAncylostoma ceylanicum andA. caninum

Authors: Yeqi Fu; Mingwei Wang; Xinxin Yan; Auwalu Yusuf Abdullahi; Jianxiong Hang; Pan Zhang; Yue Huang; Yunqiu Liu; Yongxiang Sun; Rongkun Ran; Guoqing Li
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

To develop aTm-shift method for detection of dog-derivedAncylostoma ceylanicum andA. caninum, three sets of primers were designed based on three SNPs (ITS71, ITS197, and ITS296) of their internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) sequences. The detection effect of the Tm-shift was assessed through the stability, sensitivity, accuracy test, and clinical detection. The results showed that these three sets of primers could distinguish accurately betweenA. ceylanicum andA. caninum. The coefficient of variation in their Tm values on the three SNPs was 0.09% and 0.15% (ITS71), 0.18% and 0.14% (ITS197), and 0.13% and 0.07% (ITS296), respectively. The lowest detectable concentration of standard plasmids forA. ceylanicum andA. caninum was 5.33 × 10−6 ng/μL and 5.03 × 10−6 ng/μL. The Tm-shift results of ten DNA samples from the dog-derived hookworms were consistent with their known species. In the clinical detection of 50 fecal samples from stray dogs, the positive rate of hookworm detected by Tm-shift (42%) was significantly higher than that by microscopic examination (34%), and the former can identify theAncylostoma species. It is concluded that the Tm-shift method is rapid, specific, sensitive, and suitable for the clinical detection and zoonotic risk assessment of the dog-derived hookworm.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Hookworms are common intestinal parasites distributed globally, which can cause serious harm to the health of dogs, cats, and human beings. There are four species of hookworms, that is,Ancylostoma caninum, A. ceylanicum, A. braziliense, andUncinaria stenocephala, that can infect dogs [1]. According to a recent survey, stray dogs are infected mainly byA. ceylanicumandA. caninumin China [2]. It was reported thatA. ceylanicumhas become the second most common species of hookworm that can infect humans in Asia [3, 4], especially in Southeast Asian countries such as China [5, 6], Japan [7], Malaysia [8], Laos [9], Thailand [10], and India [11]. Occasionally,A. caninumcan reach adulthood in people [1]. These two hookworms are zoonotic parasites that can parasitize the host’s intestinal tract and cause severe symptoms such as intestinal bleeding, anemia, malnutrition, and dermatitis [12, 13]. Therefore, it is very important to establish a rapid and accurate identification method for the two dog-derived hookworms for the prevention and control of hookworm disease.Fecal examination is a traditional method for detecting hookworms, but it is easily missed under mild infection. Because of morphological similarities of different hookworm eggs, it is difficult to identify them only by their appearance. Presently, many molecular detection technologies have been applied to the identification of hookworms, such as specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR), multiplex polymerase chain reaction (multi-PCR), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), and high resolution melting (HRM) [14–16]. However, there are still some shortcomings, such as being unable to detect a large quantity of samples at the same time, complicated operation, and high cost.Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) has become a molecular genetic marker of the third generation after RFLP and microsatellite sequence (MS) [17, 18]. The Tm-shift based on the SNP is a new molecular detection method, where two specific primers and a reverse primer are designed as follows: the 3′-end of specific primer binds to SNP loci, and two GC-rich sequences with unequal length and no pairing with the template are added at the 5′-end, respectively. Then, PCR products of samples are detected according to different peaks of melting curve in different Tm values [19]. The Tm-shift method can satisfy the high-throughput research and has efficient, accurate, and inexpensive advantages [20]. So far, this method has been applied in many fields including medicine, microbiology, and aquatic biology [21–23]. Recently, we established Tm-shift genotyping method for detection of cat-derivedGiardia lamblia assemblages A and F [24], which has developed a new genotyping method for veterinary parasitic protozoa.This study developed aTm-shift method for detectingA. ceylanicum andA. caninum from dogs based on three SNP loci of rDNA ITS1 sequences of two hookworms, in order to establish a rapid and accurate method for identifying the species of dog-derived hookworms which could provide a new technical means for clinical detection of hookworms and zoonotic risk assessment.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Source of Samples

AdultA. ceylanicum andA. caninum samples were isolated and identified by Liu et al. [2, 6], preserved in 75% alcohol, and stored in our laboratory. Fecal samples were collected from stray dogs of pet shelters in Shantou, Foshan, and Shaoguan districts of Guangdong province in China, preserved in 2.5% potassium dichromate, and stored at −20°C for use.


### 2.2. Genomic DNA Extraction

The adult hookworms preserved were repeatedly washed with double-distilled water (ddH2O), and total genomic DNA was extracted using the Wizard® SV Genomic DNA Purification System (Promega, Guangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. All clinical fecal samples were dissolved in ddH2O and then pretreated with 5 cycles of heating at 100°C for 5 min, followed by immediate freezing at −80°C for 5 min. Genomic DNA of clinical fecal samples was extracted using Stool DNA extraction kit (Omega, Guangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Extracted DNAs were then stored at −20°C for use.


### 2.3. PCR Amplification of ITS1 Sequence

The ITS1 sequences ofA. ceylanicum andA. caninum were amplified using a forward primer AF (5′-CTTTGTCGGGAAGGTTGG-3′) and a reverse primer AR (5′-TTCACCACTCTAAGCGTCT-3′) designed by Liu et al. [15]. The predictive amplification fragment was 404 bp. Polymerase chain reactions were performed in 25 μL, including 12.5 μL of Premix Ex-Taq polymerase (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), 9.5 μL of ddH2O, 0.5 μL of each primer AF/AR (50 μmol/L), and 2 μL of DNA sample. PCR cycling parameters were as follows: 1 cycle at 94°C for 5 min and then 35 cycles at 94°C for 30 sec, at 61.5°C for 30 sec, and at 72°C for 45 sec, followed by 1 cycle at 72°C for 7 min. The PCR products were analysed by gel electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gels, stained with 0.2 mg/ml ethidium bromide, and visualized on a UV transilluminator.


### 2.4. Preparation of Standard Plasmids

The purified PCR products were cloned inEscherichia coli and connected with pMD18-T (TakaRa, Dalian, China) and then transferred into DH5α Competent Cells (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). Positive clones were screened by bacterial PCR and sent to Shenggong Corporation (Shanghai, China) for sequencing. The plasmid DNAs were extracted using the Plasmid Kit (Omega, Guangzhou, China). These plasmids containing ITS1 sequence ofA. ceylanicum andA. caninum were named AceP and AcaP, respectively. The A260/A280 value and concentration of plasmids (1 μL) were measured using ultra-micro-spectrophotometer, where A260/A280 value and optimal concentration should be 1.8~2.0 and 50 ng/μL. These plasmids were stored at −20°C for use.


### 2.5. Establishment ofTm-Shift Method Based on SNP

Three sets ofTm-shift primers (including two forward specific primers and one common reverse primer) based on three SNPs (ITS71, ITS197, and ITS296) were designed by software Primer Premier 5.0, referencing to two sequences (KM066110.1, LC177192.1) downloaded from GenBank. Their sequence composition and predictive amplification fragment are shown in Table 1. The above-mentioned primers were synthesized by Shenggong Corporation (Shanghai, China), diluted with sterile double-distilled water at a final concentration of 10 pmol/μL, and stored at −20°C for use. PCR amplification and Tm-shift reaction were performed once in Rotor-Gene Q. The reaction system was performed in 20 μL, including 10 μL of SYBR®Premix Ex-Taq™ II (2x), 0.4 μL of long-tail primer, 0.4 μL of short-tail primer, 0.8 μL of common reverse primer, 7.4 μL of ddH2O, and 1.0 μL of plasmid. PCR cycling parameters were as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min and then 40 cycles at 95°C for 10 sec and 63°C for 30 sec. Melting process was from 70 to 95°C at the rate of 0.5°C/sec.Table 1
Primers forTm-shift method based on five SNPs.
Primer Nucleotide sequence (5′–3′) Product length (bp) ITS71TF(Aca) GCGGCGCTATGTGCAGCAAGAGT ITS71CF(Ace) GCGGGCAGGGCGGGCTATGTGCAGCAAGAGC 113 ITS71R ACAAGCAGTAAGGCGGCATTCA ITS197GF(Aca) GCGGCGTGAGCATTAGGCTAACGCCTG ITS197AF(Ace) GCGGGCAGGGCGGGTGAGCATTAGGCTAACGCCTA 114 ITS197R ACGATTCTGCAAACATTAAACGTAAAAAGT ITS296TF(Ace) GCGGCGTTTGCAGAATCGTGACTTT ITS296GF(Aca) GCGGGCAGGGCGGGTTTGCAGAATCGTGACTTG 127 ITS296R TTCACCACTCTAAGCGTCT ITS26AF(Aca) GCGGCGGAAGGTTGGGAGTATCA ITS26GF(Ace) GCGGGCAGGGCGGGGAAGGTTGGGAGTATCG 121 ITS26R GTCTAAAGCTCAGCGAAAC ITS48AF(Aca) GCGGCGCCGTTACAGCCCTACGTA ITS48GF(Ace) GCGGGCAGGGCGGGCCGTTACAGCCCTACGTG 116 ITS48R ATGCAATGCTCATCAAGTC The GC tails are bold and underlined. Primers at ITS26 and ITS48 failed to distinguish betweenA. ceylanicum and A. caninum.


### 2.6. Stability, Sensitivity, and Accuracy Test

The detection effect of theTm-shift was assessed through the stability, sensitivity, and accuracy test. We tested the reproducibility of two known standard plasmids (AceP and AcaP). Intra-assays were tested seven times, and interassays were tested three times for each plasmid. For detection of the sensitivity of the Tm-shift method, two standard plasmids (AceP and AcaP) were diluted ten times and detected according to the concentration of 1 : 10~1 : 108. To evaluate the Tm-shift method’s accuracy, we detected ten samples with known hookworm species. All reaction system and cycling parameters were the same as mentioned above.


### 2.7. Clinical Detection

Fifty fecal samples from the stray dogs were examined by the flotation technique with saturated zinc sulfate and theTm-shift method. Tm-shift classification results were further confirmed by DNA sequencing.


## 2.1. Source of Samples

AdultA. ceylanicum andA. caninum samples were isolated and identified by Liu et al. [2, 6], preserved in 75% alcohol, and stored in our laboratory. Fecal samples were collected from stray dogs of pet shelters in Shantou, Foshan, and Shaoguan districts of Guangdong province in China, preserved in 2.5% potassium dichromate, and stored at −20°C for use.


## 2.2. Genomic DNA Extraction

The adult hookworms preserved were repeatedly washed with double-distilled water (ddH2O), and total genomic DNA was extracted using the Wizard® SV Genomic DNA Purification System (Promega, Guangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. All clinical fecal samples were dissolved in ddH2O and then pretreated with 5 cycles of heating at 100°C for 5 min, followed by immediate freezing at −80°C for 5 min. Genomic DNA of clinical fecal samples was extracted using Stool DNA extraction kit (Omega, Guangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Extracted DNAs were then stored at −20°C for use.


## 2.3. PCR Amplification of ITS1 Sequence

The ITS1 sequences ofA. ceylanicum andA. caninum were amplified using a forward primer AF (5′-CTTTGTCGGGAAGGTTGG-3′) and a reverse primer AR (5′-TTCACCACTCTAAGCGTCT-3′) designed by Liu et al. [15]. The predictive amplification fragment was 404 bp. Polymerase chain reactions were performed in 25 μL, including 12.5 μL of Premix Ex-Taq polymerase (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), 9.5 μL of ddH2O, 0.5 μL of each primer AF/AR (50 μmol/L), and 2 μL of DNA sample. PCR cycling parameters were as follows: 1 cycle at 94°C for 5 min and then 35 cycles at 94°C for 30 sec, at 61.5°C for 30 sec, and at 72°C for 45 sec, followed by 1 cycle at 72°C for 7 min. The PCR products were analysed by gel electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gels, stained with 0.2 mg/ml ethidium bromide, and visualized on a UV transilluminator.


## 2.4. Preparation of Standard Plasmids

The purified PCR products were cloned inEscherichia coli and connected with pMD18-T (TakaRa, Dalian, China) and then transferred into DH5α Competent Cells (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). Positive clones were screened by bacterial PCR and sent to Shenggong Corporation (Shanghai, China) for sequencing. The plasmid DNAs were extracted using the Plasmid Kit (Omega, Guangzhou, China). These plasmids containing ITS1 sequence ofA. ceylanicum andA. caninum were named AceP and AcaP, respectively. The A260/A280 value and concentration of plasmids (1 μL) were measured using ultra-micro-spectrophotometer, where A260/A280 value and optimal concentration should be 1.8~2.0 and 50 ng/μL. These plasmids were stored at −20°C for use.


## 2.5. Establishment ofTm-Shift Method Based on SNP

Three sets ofTm-shift primers (including two forward specific primers and one common reverse primer) based on three SNPs (ITS71, ITS197, and ITS296) were designed by software Primer Premier 5.0, referencing to two sequences (KM066110.1, LC177192.1) downloaded from GenBank. Their sequence composition and predictive amplification fragment are shown in Table 1. The above-mentioned primers were synthesized by Shenggong Corporation (Shanghai, China), diluted with sterile double-distilled water at a final concentration of 10 pmol/μL, and stored at −20°C for use. PCR amplification and Tm-shift reaction were performed once in Rotor-Gene Q. The reaction system was performed in 20 μL, including 10 μL of SYBR®Premix Ex-Taq™ II (2x), 0.4 μL of long-tail primer, 0.4 μL of short-tail primer, 0.8 μL of common reverse primer, 7.4 μL of ddH2O, and 1.0 μL of plasmid. PCR cycling parameters were as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min and then 40 cycles at 95°C for 10 sec and 63°C for 30 sec. Melting process was from 70 to 95°C at the rate of 0.5°C/sec.Table 1
Primers forTm-shift method based on five SNPs.
Primer Nucleotide sequence (5′–3′) Product length (bp) ITS71TF(Aca) GCGGCGCTATGTGCAGCAAGAGT ITS71CF(Ace) GCGGGCAGGGCGGGCTATGTGCAGCAAGAGC 113 ITS71R ACAAGCAGTAAGGCGGCATTCA ITS197GF(Aca) GCGGCGTGAGCATTAGGCTAACGCCTG ITS197AF(Ace) GCGGGCAGGGCGGGTGAGCATTAGGCTAACGCCTA 114 ITS197R ACGATTCTGCAAACATTAAACGTAAAAAGT ITS296TF(Ace) GCGGCGTTTGCAGAATCGTGACTTT ITS296GF(Aca) GCGGGCAGGGCGGGTTTGCAGAATCGTGACTTG 127 ITS296R TTCACCACTCTAAGCGTCT ITS26AF(Aca) GCGGCGGAAGGTTGGGAGTATCA ITS26GF(Ace) GCGGGCAGGGCGGGGAAGGTTGGGAGTATCG 121 ITS26R GTCTAAAGCTCAGCGAAAC ITS48AF(Aca) GCGGCGCCGTTACAGCCCTACGTA ITS48GF(Ace) GCGGGCAGGGCGGGCCGTTACAGCCCTACGTG 116 ITS48R ATGCAATGCTCATCAAGTC The GC tails are bold and underlined. Primers at ITS26 and ITS48 failed to distinguish betweenA. ceylanicum and A. caninum.


## 2.6. Stability, Sensitivity, and Accuracy Test

The detection effect of theTm-shift was assessed through the stability, sensitivity, and accuracy test. We tested the reproducibility of two known standard plasmids (AceP and AcaP). Intra-assays were tested seven times, and interassays were tested three times for each plasmid. For detection of the sensitivity of the Tm-shift method, two standard plasmids (AceP and AcaP) were diluted ten times and detected according to the concentration of 1 : 10~1 : 108. To evaluate the Tm-shift method’s accuracy, we detected ten samples with known hookworm species. All reaction system and cycling parameters were the same as mentioned above.


## 2.7. Clinical Detection

Fifty fecal samples from the stray dogs were examined by the flotation technique with saturated zinc sulfate and theTm-shift method. Tm-shift classification results were further confirmed by DNA sequencing.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Amplification of ITS1 Fragment and Preparation of Plasmids

The amplified ITS1 fragment from two genomic DNAs of dog-derivedA. ceylanicum andA. caninum was 404 bp long (Figure 1) and the generated sequence data were submitted to GenBank (accession numbers: MG733994, MG733993). BLAST analysis indicated the highest similarity (100%) withA. ceylanicum from Japan (LC036567) and the highest similarity (99%) withA. caninumfrom Australia (KP844730). Thus, two hookworms were identified asA. ceylanicumandA. caninum. The A260/A280 values of positive plasmids AceP and AcaP were between 1.8 and 2.0, respectively. Their concentrations were 53.3 ng/μL and 50.3 ng/μL, respectively.Figure 1
PCR amplification of the ITS1 sequence of two hookworms. MDL-500 DNA marker; 1: positive control; 2:A. ceylanicum; 3:A. caninum; 4: negative control.


### 3.2. Detection of qPCR-Tm-Shift

The standard curves ofTm-shift based on ITS71, ITS197, and ITS296 for standard plasmid AceP and AcaP are shown in Figure 2. The result showed that Tm-shift method based on three SNPs could distinguish betweenA. ceylanicum andA. caninum. Software analysis showed that the Tm values of AceP (A. ceylanicum) and AcaP (A. caninum) in three sets of primers were 88.0°C and 86.0°C (ITS71), 86.0°C and 85.0°C (ITS197), and 84.0°C and 85.0°C (ITS296), respectively.Figure 2
Standard curves ofTm-shift for two hookworm standard plasmids based on ITS71 (a), ITS197 (b), and ITS296 (c). AceP:A. ceylanicum standard plasmid; AcaP:A. caninum standard plasmid; Neg: negative control.
(a) (b) (c)


### 3.3. Stability, Sensitivity, and Accuracy

The stability test results are shown in Table2. In primer ITS71, the coefficient of variation (CV) of AceP and AcaP melting temperature (Tm) was 0.15 and 0.09%. In primer ITS197, the CV of AceP and AcaP melting temperature was 0.14 and 0.18%. And in primer ITS296, the CV of AceP and AcaP melting temperature was 0.07 and 0.13%. When AceP and AcaP samples were diluted to 1 : 107 (5.33 × 10−6 ng/μL and 5.03 × 10−6 ng/μL), the Tm-shift method was still able to identify both of them. However, when the samples were diluted to 1 : 108, all of them could not be determined (Table 3). A total of ten known hookworm samples from dogs were randomly selected and detected. The Tm-shift detection results based on ITS71, ITS197, and ITS296 were identical to their known hookworm species (Table 4).Table 2
The stability ofTm-shift method.
Repeat ITS71 (Tm) ITS197 (Tm) ITS296 (Tm) AcaP AceP AcaP AceP AcaP AceP First (n=7) 86.1 ± 0.1°C 88.0 ± 0.1°C 85.1 ± 0.1°C 85.9 ± 0.1°C 85.0 ± 0.1°C 84.0 ± 0.1°C Second (n=7) 86.1 ± 0.2°C 88.1 ± 0.1°C 85.1 ± 0.1°C 85.9 ± 0.1°C 85.0 ± 0.1°C 84.0 ± 0.2°C Third (n=7) 86.1 ± 0.1°C 87.9 ± 0.1°C 85.1 ± 0.2°C 85.9 ± 0.1°C 85.1 ± 0.1°C 84.1 ± 0.1°C Average (n=21) 86.10°C 88.00°C 85.10°C 85.90°C 85.03°C 84.03°C CV 0.15% 0.09% 0.14% 0.18% 0.07% 0.13%Table 3
The sensitivity ofTm-shift method.
Dilution ITS71 (Tm) ITS197 (Tm) ITS296 (Tm) AcaP AceP AcaP AceP AcaP AceP 1 : 101 86.1°C 88.0°C 85.0°C 86.0°C 85.0°C 83.9°C 1 : 102 85.9°C 88.1°C 85.0°C 86.0°C 85.0°C 84.0°C 1 : 103 86.0°C 88.1°C 85.1°C 86.0°C 85.0°C 84.0°C 1 : 104 86.0°C 88.0°C 85.0°C 86.0°C 85.0°C 84.0°C 1 : 105 86.1°C 88.1°C 84.9°C 86.1°C 85.0°C 83.9°C 1 : 106 86.1°C 88.0°C 85.1°C 86.1°C 84.9°C 83.9°C 1 : 107 86.0°C 88.0°C 85.1°C 86.1°C 85.0°C 83.9°C 1 : 108 — — — — — — —: not detected.Table 4
The accuracy ofTm-shift method.
Sample Species ITS71 (Tm) ITS197 (Tm) ITS296 (Tm) GenBank D22 A. caninum 86.0°C 85.0°C 85.0°C KC755016 D55 A. ceylanicum 88.0°C 86.0°C 84.0°C KC755015 D60 A. ceylanicum 88.0°C 85.9°C 83.9°C KC755020 D74 A. ceylanicum 88.0°C 86.0°C 84.0°C KC755021 D23 A. caninum 86.1°C 85.0°C 85.1°C KC755017 D28 A. caninum 86.0°C 85.1°C 85.0°C KC755018 D34 A. caninum 86.1°C 85.1°C 85.0°C KC755019 D79 A. ceylanicum 88.0°C 86.0°C 84.0°C KC755022 D23 A. ceylanicum 87.9°C 86.0°C 84.0°C KF279132 D32 A. ceylanicum 88.0°C 86.0°C 84.0°C KF279133 Samples D22, D23, D28, D34, D55, D60, D74, and D79 were isolated and identified by Liu et al. [2]. Samples G23 and G32 were isolated and identified by Liu et al. [6].


### 3.4. Clinical Detection

Seventeen out of fifty fecal samples from dogs were microscopically positive for hookworm but twenty-one of them were positive for hookworm usingTm-shift method, where fourteen were identified asA. ceylanicum and seven asA. caninum. The melting curves and detection results are shown in Figure 3. All detection results were identical to their sequencing results.Figure 3
Melting curves ofTm-shift based on ITS71 (a), ITS197 (b), and ITS296 (c) and detection results for 21 hookworm-positive samples.
(a) (b)  (c)


## 3.1. Amplification of ITS1 Fragment and Preparation of Plasmids

The amplified ITS1 fragment from two genomic DNAs of dog-derivedA. ceylanicum andA. caninum was 404 bp long (Figure 1) and the generated sequence data were submitted to GenBank (accession numbers: MG733994, MG733993). BLAST analysis indicated the highest similarity (100%) withA. ceylanicum from Japan (LC036567) and the highest similarity (99%) withA. caninumfrom Australia (KP844730). Thus, two hookworms were identified asA. ceylanicumandA. caninum. The A260/A280 values of positive plasmids AceP and AcaP were between 1.8 and 2.0, respectively. Their concentrations were 53.3 ng/μL and 50.3 ng/μL, respectively.Figure 1
PCR amplification of the ITS1 sequence of two hookworms. MDL-500 DNA marker; 1: positive control; 2:A. ceylanicum; 3:A. caninum; 4: negative control.


## 3.2. Detection of qPCR-Tm-Shift

The standard curves ofTm-shift based on ITS71, ITS197, and ITS296 for standard plasmid AceP and AcaP are shown in Figure 2. The result showed that Tm-shift method based on three SNPs could distinguish betweenA. ceylanicum andA. caninum. Software analysis showed that the Tm values of AceP (A. ceylanicum) and AcaP (A. caninum) in three sets of primers were 88.0°C and 86.0°C (ITS71), 86.0°C and 85.0°C (ITS197), and 84.0°C and 85.0°C (ITS296), respectively.Figure 2
Standard curves ofTm-shift for two hookworm standard plasmids based on ITS71 (a), ITS197 (b), and ITS296 (c). AceP:A. ceylanicum standard plasmid; AcaP:A. caninum standard plasmid; Neg: negative control.
(a) (b) (c)


## 3.3. Stability, Sensitivity, and Accuracy

The stability test results are shown in Table2. In primer ITS71, the coefficient of variation (CV) of AceP and AcaP melting temperature (Tm) was 0.15 and 0.09%. In primer ITS197, the CV of AceP and AcaP melting temperature was 0.14 and 0.18%. And in primer ITS296, the CV of AceP and AcaP melting temperature was 0.07 and 0.13%. When AceP and AcaP samples were diluted to 1 : 107 (5.33 × 10−6 ng/μL and 5.03 × 10−6 ng/μL), the Tm-shift method was still able to identify both of them. However, when the samples were diluted to 1 : 108, all of them could not be determined (Table 3). A total of ten known hookworm samples from dogs were randomly selected and detected. The Tm-shift detection results based on ITS71, ITS197, and ITS296 were identical to their known hookworm species (Table 4).Table 2
The stability ofTm-shift method.
Repeat ITS71 (Tm) ITS197 (Tm) ITS296 (Tm) AcaP AceP AcaP AceP AcaP AceP First (n=7) 86.1 ± 0.1°C 88.0 ± 0.1°C 85.1 ± 0.1°C 85.9 ± 0.1°C 85.0 ± 0.1°C 84.0 ± 0.1°C Second (n=7) 86.1 ± 0.2°C 88.1 ± 0.1°C 85.1 ± 0.1°C 85.9 ± 0.1°C 85.0 ± 0.1°C 84.0 ± 0.2°C Third (n=7) 86.1 ± 0.1°C 87.9 ± 0.1°C 85.1 ± 0.2°C 85.9 ± 0.1°C 85.1 ± 0.1°C 84.1 ± 0.1°C Average (n=21) 86.10°C 88.00°C 85.10°C 85.90°C 85.03°C 84.03°C CV 0.15% 0.09% 0.14% 0.18% 0.07% 0.13%Table 3
The sensitivity ofTm-shift method.
Dilution ITS71 (Tm) ITS197 (Tm) ITS296 (Tm) AcaP AceP AcaP AceP AcaP AceP 1 : 101 86.1°C 88.0°C 85.0°C 86.0°C 85.0°C 83.9°C 1 : 102 85.9°C 88.1°C 85.0°C 86.0°C 85.0°C 84.0°C 1 : 103 86.0°C 88.1°C 85.1°C 86.0°C 85.0°C 84.0°C 1 : 104 86.0°C 88.0°C 85.0°C 86.0°C 85.0°C 84.0°C 1 : 105 86.1°C 88.1°C 84.9°C 86.1°C 85.0°C 83.9°C 1 : 106 86.1°C 88.0°C 85.1°C 86.1°C 84.9°C 83.9°C 1 : 107 86.0°C 88.0°C 85.1°C 86.1°C 85.0°C 83.9°C 1 : 108 — — — — — — —: not detected.Table 4
The accuracy ofTm-shift method.
Sample Species ITS71 (Tm) ITS197 (Tm) ITS296 (Tm) GenBank D22 A. caninum 86.0°C 85.0°C 85.0°C KC755016 D55 A. ceylanicum 88.0°C 86.0°C 84.0°C KC755015 D60 A. ceylanicum 88.0°C 85.9°C 83.9°C KC755020 D74 A. ceylanicum 88.0°C 86.0°C 84.0°C KC755021 D23 A. caninum 86.1°C 85.0°C 85.1°C KC755017 D28 A. caninum 86.0°C 85.1°C 85.0°C KC755018 D34 A. caninum 86.1°C 85.1°C 85.0°C KC755019 D79 A. ceylanicum 88.0°C 86.0°C 84.0°C KC755022 D23 A. ceylanicum 87.9°C 86.0°C 84.0°C KF279132 D32 A. ceylanicum 88.0°C 86.0°C 84.0°C KF279133 Samples D22, D23, D28, D34, D55, D60, D74, and D79 were isolated and identified by Liu et al. [2]. Samples G23 and G32 were isolated and identified by Liu et al. [6].


## 3.4. Clinical Detection

Seventeen out of fifty fecal samples from dogs were microscopically positive for hookworm but twenty-one of them were positive for hookworm usingTm-shift method, where fourteen were identified asA. ceylanicum and seven asA. caninum. The melting curves and detection results are shown in Figure 3. All detection results were identical to their sequencing results.Figure 3
Melting curves ofTm-shift based on ITS71 (a), ITS197 (b), and ITS296 (c) and detection results for 21 hookworm-positive samples.
(a) (b)  (c)


## 4. Discussion

Dogs are important reservoir host to zoonotic hookwormsA. ceylanicum andA. caninum.Genetic evolution analysis indicated that dog-derivedA. ceylanicum and human-derivedA. ceylanicumfrom China [25], Malaysia [26], Kampuchea [27], and India [13] have the closest genetic relationship, and the infection rate ofA. ceylanicumbetween humans and dogs had a strong correlation in the same region, as well as confirming the possibility of transmission ofA. ceylanicum between humans and animals [28].A. caninum mainly infects dogs and cats and sometimes infects people. Dogs are both companion animals for humans and susceptible animals to zoonotic hookworms. With the development of economy and improvement of life quality, the number of people raising dogs has been increasing. Therefore, the establishment of Tm-shift method for detection ofA. ceylanicum andA. caninum has important significance in the prevention and control of zoonotic ancylostomiasis.Currently, the species identification of hookworm is mainly dependent on molecular means such as specific PCR, multi-PCR, RFLP, and HRM [14–16]. However, there are still some limitations. The conventional PCR can only detect a single pathogen. Although multi-PCR can simultaneously detect multiple pathogens, it is necessary to design more primers and the PCR conditions are demanding. The RFLP technology can only select specific endonuclease, and the operation is tedious and time-consuming, with low sensitivity for false negatives. HRM is similar to the Tm-shift method through test of the melting curve of PCR products. But it is based on the different GC content and base complementarity in the same DNA sequence to detect samples. When difference bases are counteracted in the sequence, two peaks of melting curve are difficult to distinguish and easily cause detection failure [29]. Compared with specific PCR, multi-PCR, and RFLP, the Tm-shift method can detect 36 or 72 samples simultaneously. Its closed tube operation can greatly reduce the risk of contaminated samples. Also, there is no need to use the poisonous reagent ethidium bromide (EB), which thus can reduce pollution to the environment and ensure safety of the researchers. The Tm-shift method has clear price advantage compared with HRM, because of the use of instruments for ordinary fluorescence PCR and fluorescent dyes for ordinary SYBR Green I rather than saturation dyes Eva Green and LC Green. In addition, the detection efficiency is improved through amplification of the target fragment by two-step method.Although theTm-shift detection method has its unique advantages, it also has some limitations. It has higher demand of two specific primers, whose Tm value should be 59~62°C, and their length should be controlled in 15~22 bp. In order to give better amplification efficiency of Taq polymerase, the gap of the Tm values between the reverse primer and the specific primers (before joining at the 5′-end sequence) must be maintained between 4 and 5°C. It is due to the high screening conditions of specific primers that some SNP loci failed to design suitable primers. Among five SNP loci (Table 1) originally designed in this experiment, two loci (ITS26 and ITS48) failed to distinguish betweenA. ceylanicum andA. caninum, thus leading to the failure of detection. Another three SNP loci (ITS71, ITS197, and ITS296) could distinguish between two species of hookworms. The Tm value of the melting curve betweenA. ceylanicum andA. caninum differed at 2°C on ITS71 but 1°C on ITS197 and ITS296. The ITS71 locus identification had the best effect. Among 50 dog-derived fecal samples detected, 21 samples were positive for hookworms by Tm-shift method (14A. ceylanicumand 7A. caninum), which had 4 more positive samples than microscopic examination (17 positive samples), and can accurately identify the species of hookworms from stray dogs.In conclusion,Tm-shift method based on three SNP loci of ITS1 sequences ofA. ceylanicumandA. caninum was used for the first time for their classification. The successful identification of two hookworms indicates that the method is specific, sensitive, economical, practical, and safe, which can provide a new technical means for clinical detection of hookworm and zoonotic risk assessment.



---

*Source: 7617094-2018-05-13.xml*