# The Level of Vitamin D in Children and Adolescents with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Authors: Shanshan Zhu; Yuhui Wang; Fei Luo; Jie Liu; Liangchang Xiu; Jiheng Qin; Tao Wang; Na Yu; Hongfu Wu; Tangbin Zou
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

Background. The relationship between vitamin D level and NAFLD has not been investigated in children and adolescents. We performed a meta-analysis of published observational studies to assess this association between vitamin D levels (measured as serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH)D]) and NAFLD in this age group.Methods. Relevant studies conducted before May 20, 2018, were identified from the following electronic databases: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and the Chinese CNKI databases. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale, and associations between vitamin D levels and NAFLD were estimated using standardised mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup and sensitivity analysis were used to identify sources of heterogeneity, and publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots.Results. Eight articles were included in this meta-analysis. A significant difference was observed between low 25(OH)D levels and NAFLD in children and adolescents (SMD = -0.59, 95%CI = -0.98, -0.20,P< 0.01). Subgroup analysis revealed no differences in the study type, geographic location, BMI, and age subgroups.Conclusions. Low vitamin D levels were associated with NAFLD in children and adolescents.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is characterised by diffuse hepatocellular bullae and fatty changes detected in individuals with no evidence of excessive alcohol consumption [1]. NAFLD is a progressive disorder that ranges from simple steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and even to fibrosis and cirrhosis that can further progress to liver failure or hepatocellular carcinoma. The global prevalence of NAFLD in the general population is estimated at 20%–30% in western countries and 5%–18% in Asia, and it continues to grow [2, 3]. Over the past two decades, the epidemic of overweight and obesity has made the development of NAFLD, the leading cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. However, the risk factors of NAFLD are unclear and difficult to assess with precision, owing to lack of simple, noninvasive diagnostic tests [2, 4].Vitamin D plays a key role in calcium and phosphorus homeostasis and is implicated in many diseases, including cardiovascular disease, autoimmune disease, infectious disease, and common cancers [5–7]. The main storage form of vitamin D is 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], which is converted to a biologically active form 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D [1,25(OH)2D] in kidneys [8]. Vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency are also worldwide concerns, but they are no longer as extreme as in the past. Many studies have proposed that low vitamin D levels are strongly associated with features of metabolic syndrome [9]. Animal model studies have shown that vitamin D deficiency exacerbates NAFLD histology [10, 11]. Low vitamin D levels are also associated with liver steatosis, necroinflammation, and fibrosis in adult patients with NAFLD [12].A link between low vitamin D levels and NAFLD has also been reported in a meta-analysis in adults, but data evaluated vitamin D status and NAFLD are sparse in pediatric population [13, 14]. Despite the similar characteristics of NAFLD shared with adult and adolescent patients, differences in histology are evident; for example, severe obesity adolescents may have a more aggressive NAFLD course with high risks for liver-related morbidities and mortality, and adolescent and adult severe obesity populations may have coinciding but changed NAFLD etiologies or risk factors [15, 16]. In recent years, research concerning the association between vitamin D levels and NAFLD could potentially lead to better insight into the pathogenesis of NAFLD in children and adolescents. And a recent study found no direct relationship between vitamin D deficiency and hepatosteatosis [17]. At present, data on an association between vitamin D levels and NAFLD in children and adolescents are lacking because of the difficulty of obtaining liver tissue specimens for determination of circulating vitamin D levels. Thus, the role of vitamin D in children and adolescents with NAFLD remains controversial. To the best of our knowledge, no meta-analysis data has yet examined the possible correlation between vitamin D levels and NAFLD in children and adolescents. Thus we conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between vitamin D deficiency and NAFLD in children and adolescents.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Search Strategy

The methodology was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) and the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. We conducted systematic computerised searches in the PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase databases, as well as in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, to detect all printed articles on the association between vitamin D and NAFLD in children and adolescents. We used combinations of the following key words: (Vitamin D or 25-hydroxyvitamin D or 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D or cholecalciferol or 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 or 25(OH)D or 25-hydroxycholecalciferol or 1,25(OH)2D or calcifediol) and (fatty liver or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease or NAFLD or hepatic steatosis or NASH or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis) and (children or adolescent). No language limitations were imposed. The final search was updated on May 20, 2018. Additional studies were manually identified from original studies or review articles that focused on this topic.


### 2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

An article was selected if the study involved the association between vitamin D and children and adolescents with NAFLD or NASH, where NAFLD or NASH was diagnosed by histology or suggestive imaging features (ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry), and/or suspected NAFLD was diagnosed by elevated ALT levels. The selection was not limited by design or language.We further restricted the conditions to exclude animal studies, review articles, and studies in which the participants were adults. Studies were also excluded if they had liver injury participants induced by infections (hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus), alcohol, drugs, total parenteral nutrition, or hereditary causes. After scanning the articles, those with inadequate data or those only including NAFLD or NASH individuals without controls were excluded. After removing duplicates, the titles and abstracts of the articles were skimmed and irrelevant articles were excluded. At last, the full text of the enrolled articles was explored deeply to ensure selection only of relevant articles. To capture any additional relevant studies, the reference lists of all reviews and relevant articles were screened as well.


### 2.3. Data Extraction

Following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, data were extracted using a standardised extraction form by two investigators who screened, reviewed, and extracted data each paper independently. Disagreements were resolved by discussion and consensus. Using Cohen’s kappa statistics (κ) [18], the overall agreement rate prior to correcting discrepancies was 0.85. Standardised abstraction sheets were used to record data from individual studies. Data retrieved from the studies included the first author’s name, publication year, country of origin, sample size, study design, participant characteristics (age, gender, ethnicity, and body mass index), method of diagnosis of NAFLD and controls, and techniques for measuring serum 25(OH)D. If the published articles had inadequate information, attempts were made to contact the corresponding authors to acquire missing data. All data were double checked by another investigator.


### 2.4. Quality Assessment

This meta-analysis adopted the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS), as suggested by the Cochrane Nonrandomised Studies Methods Working Group for assessment of case-control and cross-sectional studies. The NOS includes eight items under three categories: selection (four items, one star each), comparability (one item, up to two stars), and outcome (three items, one star each). A “star” represents a “high-quality” choice of an individual study. Given the variability in quality of the case-control and cross-sectional studies found in our initial literature search, we considered studies to be of high quality if they attained a score of six or more [19].


### 2.5. Statistical Analysis

We conducted the meta-analysis using STATA 12.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). For studies that reported mean and standard deviation (SD) of serum 25(OH)D levels for NAFLD and controls, we combined the standardised mean differences (SMD), using Hedge’s adjusted g to correct for small sample bias in a random effects model. Data from papers which did not present the mean and SD, values of median (m), range (a and b represent low and high end of range), Q75 (upper four quartile), and Q25 (lower four quartile) were converted into mean and SD based on the formulas shown in Table 1, and papers which involved two NAFLD or control groups were merged based on the following formulas [20, 21]:(1)x-=N1M1+N2M2N1+N2,SD=N1-1SD12+N2-1SD22+N1N2/N1+N2M12+M22-2M1M2N1+N2-1.Table 1
The best estimating formula for an unknown distribution.
Sample size (N) Mean (x-) Standard deviation (SD) N ≤ 15 a + 2 m + b 4 1 12 a - 2 m + b 2 4 + b - a 2 15 < N ≤ 25 Median b - a 4 25 < N ≤ 70 Median b - a 4 OR Q75-Q251.35 N >70 Median b - a 6 m: values of median; a: low end of range; b: high end of range; Q75: upper four quartile; Q25: lower four quartile.Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q-statistic and I2-statistics (derived from Cochran’s Q-statistic). For the Q statistic and I2-statistics,P< 0.10 and I2 > 50% were considered statistically significant for heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of a potential factor on the association as a cause of heterogeneity such as stratification of the study type, geographic location, body mass index (BMI), and age [22]. The stability of the outcomes was assessed using sensitivity analysis by sequentially omitting each individual study using the “metaninf” STATA command. We assessed publication bias through visual inspection of funnel plot asymmetry, and asymmetry was tested by Egger’s linear regression analysis.


## 2.1. Search Strategy

The methodology was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) and the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. We conducted systematic computerised searches in the PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase databases, as well as in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, to detect all printed articles on the association between vitamin D and NAFLD in children and adolescents. We used combinations of the following key words: (Vitamin D or 25-hydroxyvitamin D or 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D or cholecalciferol or 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 or 25(OH)D or 25-hydroxycholecalciferol or 1,25(OH)2D or calcifediol) and (fatty liver or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease or NAFLD or hepatic steatosis or NASH or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis) and (children or adolescent). No language limitations were imposed. The final search was updated on May 20, 2018. Additional studies were manually identified from original studies or review articles that focused on this topic.


## 2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

An article was selected if the study involved the association between vitamin D and children and adolescents with NAFLD or NASH, where NAFLD or NASH was diagnosed by histology or suggestive imaging features (ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry), and/or suspected NAFLD was diagnosed by elevated ALT levels. The selection was not limited by design or language.We further restricted the conditions to exclude animal studies, review articles, and studies in which the participants were adults. Studies were also excluded if they had liver injury participants induced by infections (hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus), alcohol, drugs, total parenteral nutrition, or hereditary causes. After scanning the articles, those with inadequate data or those only including NAFLD or NASH individuals without controls were excluded. After removing duplicates, the titles and abstracts of the articles were skimmed and irrelevant articles were excluded. At last, the full text of the enrolled articles was explored deeply to ensure selection only of relevant articles. To capture any additional relevant studies, the reference lists of all reviews and relevant articles were screened as well.


## 2.3. Data Extraction

Following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, data were extracted using a standardised extraction form by two investigators who screened, reviewed, and extracted data each paper independently. Disagreements were resolved by discussion and consensus. Using Cohen’s kappa statistics (κ) [18], the overall agreement rate prior to correcting discrepancies was 0.85. Standardised abstraction sheets were used to record data from individual studies. Data retrieved from the studies included the first author’s name, publication year, country of origin, sample size, study design, participant characteristics (age, gender, ethnicity, and body mass index), method of diagnosis of NAFLD and controls, and techniques for measuring serum 25(OH)D. If the published articles had inadequate information, attempts were made to contact the corresponding authors to acquire missing data. All data were double checked by another investigator.


## 2.4. Quality Assessment

This meta-analysis adopted the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS), as suggested by the Cochrane Nonrandomised Studies Methods Working Group for assessment of case-control and cross-sectional studies. The NOS includes eight items under three categories: selection (four items, one star each), comparability (one item, up to two stars), and outcome (three items, one star each). A “star” represents a “high-quality” choice of an individual study. Given the variability in quality of the case-control and cross-sectional studies found in our initial literature search, we considered studies to be of high quality if they attained a score of six or more [19].


## 2.5. Statistical Analysis

We conducted the meta-analysis using STATA 12.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). For studies that reported mean and standard deviation (SD) of serum 25(OH)D levels for NAFLD and controls, we combined the standardised mean differences (SMD), using Hedge’s adjusted g to correct for small sample bias in a random effects model. Data from papers which did not present the mean and SD, values of median (m), range (a and b represent low and high end of range), Q75 (upper four quartile), and Q25 (lower four quartile) were converted into mean and SD based on the formulas shown in Table 1, and papers which involved two NAFLD or control groups were merged based on the following formulas [20, 21]:(1)x-=N1M1+N2M2N1+N2,SD=N1-1SD12+N2-1SD22+N1N2/N1+N2M12+M22-2M1M2N1+N2-1.Table 1
The best estimating formula for an unknown distribution.
Sample size (N) Mean (x-) Standard deviation (SD) N ≤ 15 a + 2 m + b 4 1 12 a - 2 m + b 2 4 + b - a 2 15 < N ≤ 25 Median b - a 4 25 < N ≤ 70 Median b - a 4 OR Q75-Q251.35 N >70 Median b - a 6 m: values of median; a: low end of range; b: high end of range; Q75: upper four quartile; Q25: lower four quartile.Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q-statistic and I2-statistics (derived from Cochran’s Q-statistic). For the Q statistic and I2-statistics,P< 0.10 and I2 > 50% were considered statistically significant for heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of a potential factor on the association as a cause of heterogeneity such as stratification of the study type, geographic location, body mass index (BMI), and age [22]. The stability of the outcomes was assessed using sensitivity analysis by sequentially omitting each individual study using the “metaninf” STATA command. We assessed publication bias through visual inspection of funnel plot asymmetry, and asymmetry was tested by Egger’s linear regression analysis.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Study Inclusion and Characteristics

A total of 125 potentially relevant articles were retrieved through the computer database and manual search. Of these, 113 were excluded after the titles and abstracts were reviewed because of a clear lack of relevance, and four were excluded after the full texts were reviewed because of a lack of control groups and vitamin D data. Ultimately, eight studies that met our inclusion criteria were included in the meta-analysis. All included studies were published in English. The complete search strategy is presented in Figure1.Figure 1
Literature screening flow chart.The eight included studies were three case-control studies [23–25] and five cross-sectional studies [17, 26–29]. The characteristics of all studies on the association between vitamin D and NAFLD in children and adolescents are presented in Tables 2 and 3.Table 2
Main characteristics of studies on continuous outcomes of vitamin D levels in NAFLD and controls, chronologically ordered.
Study Year Control NAFLD P-value∗ Age(mean ± SD) No.(Female/male) 25(OH)D (ng/ml)(mean ± SD) Age(mean ± SD) No.(Female/male) 25(OH)D (ng/ml)(mean ± SD) Sezer et al.[17] 2016 12.60±3.10 53(38/15) 14.60±7.00 12.90±2.20 58(26/32) 16.60±6.20 0.113 Mohamed et al. [26] 2016 10.60±3.10 23(14/9) 41.98±14.52 11.13±2.70 47(28/19) 20.89±16.56 <0.001 Malespin et al. [27] 2015 12.90±2.90 382(193/189) 20.80±7.10 13.00±2.40 25(6/19) 16.50±6.40 0.024 Chang et al. [23] 2015 8.70±3.87 32(NR) 17.70±5.05 11.46±2.53 62(NR) 17.90±6.84 0.963 Yildiz et al. [24] 2014 11.00±2.80 43(24/19) 16.40±9.19 11.90±2.80 58(22/36) 12.60±6.52 0.005 Black et al.[28] 2014 17 838(381/457) 30.85±9.62 17 156(96/60) 26.84±8.81 <0.001 Nobili et al. [29] 2013 12.24±7.23 85(32/53) 29.04±5.81 13.00±2.96 73(NR) 19.30±6.70 <0.001 Pirgon et al. [25] 2013 12.48±1.60 72(NR) 43.96±19.97 12.80±0.80 45(NR) 29.50±18.40 <0.05 ∗The levels of 25(OH)D were compared between NAFLD and control groups; SD: standard deviation; NR: not reported.Table 3
Main characteristics of studies on the association between vitamin D and NAFLD, ordered by year of publication.
Study(authors-year) Country Race/ethnicity Study type Health status(Case) setting Method of NAFLD ascertainment BMI in NAFLD(mean±SD) BMI in controls(mean±SD) Sezer et al. (2016) [17] Turkey Turkish Cross-sectional Hepatosteatosis outpatient ultrasound 28.7±4.3 27.3±3.3 Mohamed et al. (2016) [26] Egypt Egyptian Cross-sectional NAFLD outpatient ultrasound NR NR Malespin et al. (2015) [27] USA Chinese Cross-sectional Suspected NAFLD NR Elevated ALT NR NR Chang et al. (2015) [23] Korea Korean Case control SS and NASH outpatient UPLC-MS/MS 25.89±4.13 23.7±2.63 Yildiz et al. (2014) [24] Turkey Turkish Case control Hepatosteatosis Pediatrics clinic ultrasound 30.9±3.9 29.3±4.4 Black et al. (2014) [28] Australia CaucasianNon-Caucasian Cross-sectional NAFLD General population ultrasound 27.0±7.4 22.0±3.0 Nobili et al. (2014) [29] Italy Caucasian Cross-sectional NAFLD Liver biopsy ultrasound 31.3±4.37 NR Pirgon et al. (2013) [25] Turkey Turkish Case control NAFLD Inpatient ultrasound 28.7±4.7 28.4±3.6 SS: simple steatosis; NASH: nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; NAFLD: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; BMI was measured in kg/m2; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; UPLC-MS/MS: ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.The total sample size of the studies used to analyse the continuous vitamin D data for the NAFLD condition was 2052 participants (524 NAFLD cases and 1528 controls). The results of six studies showed that the level of vitamin D was lower in the NAFLD group than in the control group (P< 0.05). We merged the groups of Chang et al. [23] in our meta-analysis, because they divided NAFLD into three groups.


### 3.2. Literature Quality Evaluation Results

The quality evaluation results showed that diagnosis of NAFLD was clear, the vitamin D detection method was reasonable, the comparisons between groups were good, and the data were complete. Following the NOS guidelines [30], the total score of all the included studies was 6 “stars” and above, and the overall quality of the studies was good. The results are shown in Table 4.Table 4
Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) assessment of the quality of the case-control and cross-sectional studies.
Study Selection Comparability Exposure Total scores Case definition adequate Representativeness of the cases Selection of controls definition of Controls Comparability based on design or analysis Ascertainment of exposure Same method of ascertainment for cases and controls Non-response rate Sezer et al. [17] ★ ★ ★ ★  ★ ★  6 Mohamed et al. [26] ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★  8 Malespin et al. [27] ★ ★  ★ ★ ★ ★  6 Chang et al. [23] ★ ★ ★ ★  ★ ★  6 Yildiz et al. [24] ★ ★ ★ ★ ★★ ★ ★  8 Black et al. [28] ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★  7 Nobili et al. [29] ★ ★  ★ ★ ★ ★  6 Pirgon et al. [25] ★ ★  ★ ★★  ★  6


### 3.3. Continuous Data of Vitamin D Levels and NAFLD in Children and Adolescents

Heterogeneity tests indicated that a large heterogeneity existed between the eight studies included in the meta-analysis (I2 = 89.8%,P< 0.001) (Figure 2), and a random effects model was used to merge the statistics and draw the forest plot (Figure 2). The forest plot showed that the diamonds are almost located on the left side of the midline, indicating that the levels of 25(OH)D were significantly lower in the patients with NAFLD than in the controls (SMD = -0.59, 95% CI = -0.98, -0.20,P= 0.003) (I2 = 89.8%,P <  0.001).Figure 2
Forest plot of the studies comparing the association between vitamin D levels and children and adolescents with NAFLD by meta-analysis with the random effects analysis.


### 3.4. Subgroup Analysis

Subgroup analyses showed that a few differences were noted between the SMD and 95% CI in the subgroups (Table5). However, it was not a significant change (case-control: SMD = -0.42, 95% CI = -0.67, -0.16; cross-sectional: SMD = -0.79, 95% CI = -1.67, 0.09) (Western: SMD = -6.04, 95% CI = -9.89, -2.18; Eastern: SMD = -6.30, 95% CI = -12.03, -0.57) (obese: SMD = -6.10, 95% CI = -12.84, 0.64; non-obese: SMD = -6.74, 95% CI = -13.10, -0.38) and (adolescents: SMD = -0.606, 95% CI = -1.129, -0.082; children: SMD = -0.575, 95% CI = -1.285, -0.135). The subgroup analysis suggested that a difference existed in the vitamin D levels between the NAFLD group and the control group.Table 5
Subgroup analysis of studies comparing the association between vitamin D levels and children and adolescents with NAFLD.
Subgroups No. (NAFLD/Control) Pooled SMD (95% CI) P s I2 (%) P 25(OH)D (ng/ml) Overall 2052 (524/1528) -0.593 (-0.983, -0.204) P= 0.003 89.8% P<0.001 Study type Cross-sectional 746 (203/543) -0.793 (-1.673, 0.088) P= 0.078 94.5% P<0.001 Case-control 1306 (321/985) -0.418 (-0.674, -0.162) P = 0.001 58.2% P = 0.066 Geographic location Western 1559 (254/1305) -0.856 (-1.558, -0.154) P = 0.017 93.7% P<0.001 Eastern 493 (270/223) -0.428 (-0.955, 0.098) P= 0.111 87.3% P<0.001 BMI (kg/m2) Obese 581 (296/285) -0.495 (-1.160, 0.170) P = 0.144 93.2% P<0.001 Non-obese 1064 (203/861) -0.834 (-1.715, 0.046) P= 0.063 89.5% P = 0.002 Else 407 (25/382) -0.609 (-1.016, -0.202) P = 0.003 NR NR Age (years) Children 265(167/98) -0.575 (-1.285,0.135) P = 0.112 86.4% P= 0.001 Adolescents 1787(357/1430) -0.606 (-1.129, -0.082) P = 0.023 92.6% P<0.001 Ps denotes P value for heterogeneity based on Q test; P denotes P value for statistical significance based on Z test.


### 3.5. Sensitivity Analysis

As shown in Figure3, the omission of the studies by Mohamed et al. [26] and Black et al. [28] resulted in a greater change in the estimated values than did omission of the other studies. However, significant relationships were noted between the low levels of vitamin D and children with NAFLD in all situations. After analysis, all the evidence from funnel plots and Egger’s test showed that no publication bias existed in the meta-analysis (data not shown).Figure 3
The sensitivity analysis for the association between vitamin D levels and NAFLD in children and adolescents by the random effects analysis.


## 3.1. Study Inclusion and Characteristics

A total of 125 potentially relevant articles were retrieved through the computer database and manual search. Of these, 113 were excluded after the titles and abstracts were reviewed because of a clear lack of relevance, and four were excluded after the full texts were reviewed because of a lack of control groups and vitamin D data. Ultimately, eight studies that met our inclusion criteria were included in the meta-analysis. All included studies were published in English. The complete search strategy is presented in Figure1.Figure 1
Literature screening flow chart.The eight included studies were three case-control studies [23–25] and five cross-sectional studies [17, 26–29]. The characteristics of all studies on the association between vitamin D and NAFLD in children and adolescents are presented in Tables 2 and 3.Table 2
Main characteristics of studies on continuous outcomes of vitamin D levels in NAFLD and controls, chronologically ordered.
Study Year Control NAFLD P-value∗ Age(mean ± SD) No.(Female/male) 25(OH)D (ng/ml)(mean ± SD) Age(mean ± SD) No.(Female/male) 25(OH)D (ng/ml)(mean ± SD) Sezer et al.[17] 2016 12.60±3.10 53(38/15) 14.60±7.00 12.90±2.20 58(26/32) 16.60±6.20 0.113 Mohamed et al. [26] 2016 10.60±3.10 23(14/9) 41.98±14.52 11.13±2.70 47(28/19) 20.89±16.56 <0.001 Malespin et al. [27] 2015 12.90±2.90 382(193/189) 20.80±7.10 13.00±2.40 25(6/19) 16.50±6.40 0.024 Chang et al. [23] 2015 8.70±3.87 32(NR) 17.70±5.05 11.46±2.53 62(NR) 17.90±6.84 0.963 Yildiz et al. [24] 2014 11.00±2.80 43(24/19) 16.40±9.19 11.90±2.80 58(22/36) 12.60±6.52 0.005 Black et al.[28] 2014 17 838(381/457) 30.85±9.62 17 156(96/60) 26.84±8.81 <0.001 Nobili et al. [29] 2013 12.24±7.23 85(32/53) 29.04±5.81 13.00±2.96 73(NR) 19.30±6.70 <0.001 Pirgon et al. [25] 2013 12.48±1.60 72(NR) 43.96±19.97 12.80±0.80 45(NR) 29.50±18.40 <0.05 ∗The levels of 25(OH)D were compared between NAFLD and control groups; SD: standard deviation; NR: not reported.Table 3
Main characteristics of studies on the association between vitamin D and NAFLD, ordered by year of publication.
Study(authors-year) Country Race/ethnicity Study type Health status(Case) setting Method of NAFLD ascertainment BMI in NAFLD(mean±SD) BMI in controls(mean±SD) Sezer et al. (2016) [17] Turkey Turkish Cross-sectional Hepatosteatosis outpatient ultrasound 28.7±4.3 27.3±3.3 Mohamed et al. (2016) [26] Egypt Egyptian Cross-sectional NAFLD outpatient ultrasound NR NR Malespin et al. (2015) [27] USA Chinese Cross-sectional Suspected NAFLD NR Elevated ALT NR NR Chang et al. (2015) [23] Korea Korean Case control SS and NASH outpatient UPLC-MS/MS 25.89±4.13 23.7±2.63 Yildiz et al. (2014) [24] Turkey Turkish Case control Hepatosteatosis Pediatrics clinic ultrasound 30.9±3.9 29.3±4.4 Black et al. (2014) [28] Australia CaucasianNon-Caucasian Cross-sectional NAFLD General population ultrasound 27.0±7.4 22.0±3.0 Nobili et al. (2014) [29] Italy Caucasian Cross-sectional NAFLD Liver biopsy ultrasound 31.3±4.37 NR Pirgon et al. (2013) [25] Turkey Turkish Case control NAFLD Inpatient ultrasound 28.7±4.7 28.4±3.6 SS: simple steatosis; NASH: nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; NAFLD: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; BMI was measured in kg/m2; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; UPLC-MS/MS: ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.The total sample size of the studies used to analyse the continuous vitamin D data for the NAFLD condition was 2052 participants (524 NAFLD cases and 1528 controls). The results of six studies showed that the level of vitamin D was lower in the NAFLD group than in the control group (P< 0.05). We merged the groups of Chang et al. [23] in our meta-analysis, because they divided NAFLD into three groups.


## 3.2. Literature Quality Evaluation Results

The quality evaluation results showed that diagnosis of NAFLD was clear, the vitamin D detection method was reasonable, the comparisons between groups were good, and the data were complete. Following the NOS guidelines [30], the total score of all the included studies was 6 “stars” and above, and the overall quality of the studies was good. The results are shown in Table 4.Table 4
Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) assessment of the quality of the case-control and cross-sectional studies.
Study Selection Comparability Exposure Total scores Case definition adequate Representativeness of the cases Selection of controls definition of Controls Comparability based on design or analysis Ascertainment of exposure Same method of ascertainment for cases and controls Non-response rate Sezer et al. [17] ★ ★ ★ ★  ★ ★  6 Mohamed et al. [26] ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★  8 Malespin et al. [27] ★ ★  ★ ★ ★ ★  6 Chang et al. [23] ★ ★ ★ ★  ★ ★  6 Yildiz et al. [24] ★ ★ ★ ★ ★★ ★ ★  8 Black et al. [28] ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★  7 Nobili et al. [29] ★ ★  ★ ★ ★ ★  6 Pirgon et al. [25] ★ ★  ★ ★★  ★  6


## 3.3. Continuous Data of Vitamin D Levels and NAFLD in Children and Adolescents

Heterogeneity tests indicated that a large heterogeneity existed between the eight studies included in the meta-analysis (I2 = 89.8%,P< 0.001) (Figure 2), and a random effects model was used to merge the statistics and draw the forest plot (Figure 2). The forest plot showed that the diamonds are almost located on the left side of the midline, indicating that the levels of 25(OH)D were significantly lower in the patients with NAFLD than in the controls (SMD = -0.59, 95% CI = -0.98, -0.20,P= 0.003) (I2 = 89.8%,P <  0.001).Figure 2
Forest plot of the studies comparing the association between vitamin D levels and children and adolescents with NAFLD by meta-analysis with the random effects analysis.


## 3.4. Subgroup Analysis

Subgroup analyses showed that a few differences were noted between the SMD and 95% CI in the subgroups (Table5). However, it was not a significant change (case-control: SMD = -0.42, 95% CI = -0.67, -0.16; cross-sectional: SMD = -0.79, 95% CI = -1.67, 0.09) (Western: SMD = -6.04, 95% CI = -9.89, -2.18; Eastern: SMD = -6.30, 95% CI = -12.03, -0.57) (obese: SMD = -6.10, 95% CI = -12.84, 0.64; non-obese: SMD = -6.74, 95% CI = -13.10, -0.38) and (adolescents: SMD = -0.606, 95% CI = -1.129, -0.082; children: SMD = -0.575, 95% CI = -1.285, -0.135). The subgroup analysis suggested that a difference existed in the vitamin D levels between the NAFLD group and the control group.Table 5
Subgroup analysis of studies comparing the association between vitamin D levels and children and adolescents with NAFLD.
Subgroups No. (NAFLD/Control) Pooled SMD (95% CI) P s I2 (%) P 25(OH)D (ng/ml) Overall 2052 (524/1528) -0.593 (-0.983, -0.204) P= 0.003 89.8% P<0.001 Study type Cross-sectional 746 (203/543) -0.793 (-1.673, 0.088) P= 0.078 94.5% P<0.001 Case-control 1306 (321/985) -0.418 (-0.674, -0.162) P = 0.001 58.2% P = 0.066 Geographic location Western 1559 (254/1305) -0.856 (-1.558, -0.154) P = 0.017 93.7% P<0.001 Eastern 493 (270/223) -0.428 (-0.955, 0.098) P= 0.111 87.3% P<0.001 BMI (kg/m2) Obese 581 (296/285) -0.495 (-1.160, 0.170) P = 0.144 93.2% P<0.001 Non-obese 1064 (203/861) -0.834 (-1.715, 0.046) P= 0.063 89.5% P = 0.002 Else 407 (25/382) -0.609 (-1.016, -0.202) P = 0.003 NR NR Age (years) Children 265(167/98) -0.575 (-1.285,0.135) P = 0.112 86.4% P= 0.001 Adolescents 1787(357/1430) -0.606 (-1.129, -0.082) P = 0.023 92.6% P<0.001 Ps denotes P value for heterogeneity based on Q test; P denotes P value for statistical significance based on Z test.


## 3.5. Sensitivity Analysis

As shown in Figure3, the omission of the studies by Mohamed et al. [26] and Black et al. [28] resulted in a greater change in the estimated values than did omission of the other studies. However, significant relationships were noted between the low levels of vitamin D and children with NAFLD in all situations. After analysis, all the evidence from funnel plots and Egger’s test showed that no publication bias existed in the meta-analysis (data not shown).Figure 3
The sensitivity analysis for the association between vitamin D levels and NAFLD in children and adolescents by the random effects analysis.


## 4. Discussion

Eight articles—five cross-sectional and three case-control studies—were included in this meta-analysis. The statistical analysis showed that levels of 25(OH)D were significantly lower in children and adolescents with NAFLD than in the controls (SMD = -0.59, 95% CI = -0.98, -0.20,P= 0.003). Further subgroup analysis based on study type, geographic location, BMI, and age resulted in no essential changes. A forest plot, which focused on the effect size, showed that vitamin D deficiency was 0.54 times less likely in children and adolescents with NAFLD than in the controls. Our findings showed that vitamin D levels were indeed lower in children and adolescents with NAFLD than in control without NAFLD.Now NAFLD has become the most common chronic liver disease among children and adolescents. However, the screening and diagnostic methods used for paediatric NAFLD are not well defined [31, 32]. Many studies suggesting that insulin resistance (IR) may strongly be associated with NAFLD, but the mechanisms underlying this association remain uncertain [33, 34]. Kitade et al. [35] found that excessive hepatic lipid accumulation induced the activation of macrophages and Kupffer cells, leading to an exaggeration of IR, as well as hepatic inflammation and fibrogenesis. Vitamin D is produced by human skin in response to the sun. Vitamin D also has various functions in addition to maintaining calcium and bone homeostasis, involving cellular proliferation, anti-inflammatory and immune-modulatory functions, and differentiation. However, the various functions of vitamin D are not limited to these functions and may extend to the protection of insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity [6, 36]. Evidence now suggests that vitamin D deficiency contributes to the progression of both IR and NAFLD and aggravates NAFLD via TLR-activation, perhaps by way of endotoxin exposure [10, 37]. Luger et al. [38] found that increasing serum indicators of IR and vitamin D deficiency are clinically relevant predictors of fibrosis.To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to investigate the association of vitamin D levels with children and adolescents with NAFLD. The method of our study had no language restrictions, thus adding strength to our study. However, the present meta-analysis had several limitations. First, the study type of the included papers was mostly observational study, which cannot easily explain the causality. Second, the diagnostic methods differed among the included papers, and this would be expected to affect the results. Third, the subgroup analysis was performed on only the study type, geographic location, and BMI [13, 14]. Some researchers have hypothesised that vitamin D deficiency may be a confounding factor for obesity associated with IR in NAFLD [39]. The results of the previous studies were consistent with our findings, despite differences in the study populations. Our meta-analysis, which included case-control and cross-sectional studies, could not readily identify a causal relationship between vitamin D and NAFLD. The potential use of vitamin D in the treatment of NAFLD has become more intriguing with the introduction of a preclinical model of steatosis, but the present study still lacks evidence from clinical trials using vitamin D supplementation in children with NAFLD. In summary, further prospective clinical studies and randomised controlled trials are needed to provide causal evidence to support the results of observational and animal studies.


## 5. Conclusion

In conclusion, our results indicated that vitamin D deficiency prevails in children and adolescents with NAFLD and vitamin D may be associated with the progression and severity of NAFLD. The relationship was analysed by subgroups, but no essential differences were noted between the subgroups. Therefore, future studies should focus on new mechanisms that can link vitamin D deficiency and children and adolescents with NAFLD. More clinical trials using vitamin D supplementation are also needed in children and adolescents with NAFLD.



---

*Source: 7643542-2019-07-14.xml*