# Effects of a Novel Convection Heated Roasting Method on Aroma and Umami Taste Components of Vegetable- and Meat-Based Extracts

Authors: In-Seek Jeong; Geon-Woo Park; Young-Sang Kim; Kyung-Ho Park; Hark Hwangbo; Sang-Yun Lee; Sang-gu Kim
Journal: Journal of Food Quality
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

Roasting has been widely used in manufacturing food products, ensuring microbial safety, and improving extraction efficiency. Roasting treatment affects various qualities such as the chemical composition, physical properties, colour, aroma, and texture of food. This study determined the effect of novel convection heated roasting on aroma and taste components, that is, amino acids (AAs) and nucleotides in vegetables, meat, and their products. Heat treatment conditions were confirmed with a temperature condition of 250°C for 20–50 min for each raw material. The individual raw materials were each subjected to a convection oven process, then mixed together, and pressurised by heating at 121°C for 3 hours to prepare a key-based broth for use in Korean soup dishes. As for aroma components, aroma of fermented spirits, unpleasant aroma, and bad aroma were observed in the absence of roasting. By contrast, convection heated roasting-related aroma components such as savoury fatty aroma, coffee aroma, and roasted barley aroma were observed in the finished products after roasting. The products’ sensory profile presumably changed from negative to positive owing to roasting. By roasting, in the case of raw material extracts, the total AA and glutamic acid contents increased to 24.1–38.1%, and for the finished product, the total AA and glutamic acid contents slightly increased to 5.8–8.9%. However, no significant effect of roasting was found on nucleotides. In conclusion, it was concluded that the positive aroma component as well as the total amount of AA (umami taste) increased owing to roasting. The present results contribute immensely to the food industry as the enhancement of taste and aroma can help with the production of more palatable foods as desired by food consumers, thereby increasing the sales of nutritious foods that otherwise consumers may not buy.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Two criteria for determining the consumption of nutritious foods are taste and aroma. For food consumers, the taste and aroma of food are crucial factors in selecting the food; therefore, the food industry is constantly making efforts to maintain or improve the unique taste and aroma of food in an optimal state [1]. During food processing, various flavour components including the ones that arouse appetite and sometimes those that cause unpleasant taste or off-flavour are generated [2]. In food, proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids are the main components lending it taste and aroma. Heat treatment leads to the interaction of these components, and the effects of the processing methods on the components create the taste and aroma that are felt by our sensory organs [3].Taste ingredients are divided into five main categories: sweet, bitter, salty, sour, and umami; umami is the fifth taste also known as savoury. Umami is a characteristic taste that is imparted by glutamate (glutamic acid) and 5′-ribonucleotides (or nucleotides) such as guanosine monophosphate (GMP) and inosine monophosphate (IMP). This study focused on umami because it is the main taste for developing the basic ingredients of seasonings and soups in processed foods.Glutamic acid and nucleotides are present in many foods and play important roles in the taste, palatability, and acceptability of foods. This distinctive taste was first discovered by K. Ikeda, who in 1908 isolated glutamate as the source of taste in a broth used in Japan prepared from seaweed konbu, a substance with high levels of natural glutamate. Monosodium glutamate was first commercially produced in Japan in 1909 and used as a seasoning similar to salt and sugar [4, 5]. In 1913, Ikeda’s disciple Kodama examined the constituents of dried skipjack and reported that IMP also had umami taste characteristics [6]. Many years later, during a study of ribonucleotide production through biochemical degradation of yeast RNA, Kuninaka and his colleagues identified GMP as another important umami substance [7–9]. Currently, monosodium glutamate and 5′-ribonucleotides are commercially available as flavouring substances worldwide.Glutamate, a component of protein, is the most abundant amino acid (AA) in nature. It is found in fish, meat, milk, and several vegetables. It is a dominant umami compound and essential for human metabolism. The nucleotide, IMP, is found in fish, pork, and beef, whereas GMP is present in meats and abundant in mushrooms. Nucleotides are also natural compounds that form the basic components of our body and are vital to human metabolism [10, 11].Aromas in foods and raw materials develop from the interactions of nonvolatile precursors, including free AA, peptides, reducing sugars, vitamins, nucleotides, and unsaturated fatty acids, during cooking. These interactions include the Maillard reaction between an amino compound and a carbonyl compound, oxidation of lipids, thermal degradation of thiamine, and interactions among these pathways [12]. Roasting has been widely used to manufacture traditional tea and is a time- and cost-effective process that ensures microbial safety and improves extraction efficiency [13]. Roasting treatment reportedly affects various qualities such as the chemical composition, physical properties, colour, aroma, and texture of food [14]. This heat treatment processing technology has been used to extend the shelf life of food and improve the content of bioactive substances [15]. When raw materials are roasted, various components change, including an increase in water-soluble solid content, which occurs owing to reactions such as decomposition, synthesis, and condensation [16].Roasting is a dry-heat cooking method where food is cooked at a high temperature of over 150°C for a short or long period. The Maillard reaction and caramelisation cause browning and formation of flavour components giving the surface a crispy texture. When vegetables such as garlic, onion, asparagus, broccoli, and root vegetables are roasted, the sugar components in the vegetables are heated to concentrate the inherent sweetness and original flavour of the vegetables, and the moisture is quickly evaporated without severe browning to maximise the flavour. Large chunks of meat, such as beef, pork, and chicken, are roasted slowly and evenly in the range of 121–375°C, then cut into small pieces, and heated at 200°C or higher; as they tend to dry out excessively, the final step is a short roast after pan cooking [17, 18].Samples used in this study were roasted by convection heating. Heat transfer by convection is slower than radiated heating but faster than conduction heating and is primarily applied to low-viscosity liquid food because it is affected by convection depending on the viscosity of the liquid [19, 20]. This recipe is a type of dry-heat cooking, where food is cooked quickly with high heat to reduce nutrient loss, improve original taste and flavour, and create a characteristic roasting flavour [21].A representative raw material for roasting is coffee beans; it is known that the variety and roasting conditions of the beans through the roasting and extraction process affect the flavour of the final coffee drink [22–25]. Research performed on coffee revealed that the processing of raw coffee materials under appropriate roasting conditions can be used to improve the quality of the raw material itself. Other investigators reported that the brownness of barley during roasting was a good indicator of the flavour produced, and roasting time and temperature had a great effect on the colour and yield of barley tea [26, 27]. In addition to coffee and barley, roasting studies have been conducted on malt [28], sesame [29], mung beans [30], silkworms [31], peel [32], omija [33], and mushrooms [34–36]. These studies reported that the quality of the raw material itself can be increased through various roasting techniques.A review of the above findings shows that research on roasting commonly involves indulgence foods such as coffee, tea, and vegetable materials. There have been few studies on taste (particularly umami) and aroma-active compounds for basic agricultural or livestock materials related to roasting. The food market has recently been expanding the availability of various seasoning foods, such as sauces and spices, that add flavour and provide food preference. There is a study on the effect of cooking methods with various heating apparatus on beef, pork, and chicken, which included the physical and sensory evaluation of heating loss, shearing force, and meat colour [37–39]. However, chemical evaluation methods have not been conducted.In this study, we compared the changes in volatile components via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and determined the AA and nucleotide contents using a high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detector (HPLC-UVD) of vegetables, meat, and their mixed products according to the novel convection heated roasting method.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Sample Preparation by Convection Heated Roasting Method

According to moisture and properties of vegetables and meat, heat treatment conditions were confirmed in a previous study. In the case of vegetables with a temperature condition of 250°C when heated for 20 min, the characteristic flavours of garlic, onion, and green onion were most superior. When heated for 10 minutes, a raw smell appeared, and when heated for 30 minutes, a burnt smell appeared. In the case of meat, it was confirmed that the rich roasted flavour of beef, pork, and chicken was well-expressed when heated for 50 min. When heated for 40 minutes, the roasted smell was weak, and when heated for 60 minutes, a burnt smell appeared. The above temperature conditions were applied when manufacturing all raw materials and for finished sauce products.For the test of raw materials, three types of agricultural products (onion, garlic, and green onion) and six types of livestock products (beef bone, pork bone, beef brisket, beef tendon, chicken feet, and chicken breast) were prepared by cutting and thawing. Each sample of 3–4 cm in size and 5–50 g in weight was subjected to a convection heated roasting or nonroasting condition. Of the raw materials, only garlic was roasted without cutting. After heating, they were mixed with purified water at a 1 : 10 ratio and the mixed solution was filtered and used for each instrument analysis.To test the sauce product, the selected materials among the above ingredients and spice ingredients were mixed and used in the preparation of the key-based broth. The selected materials were beef, pork, chicken, garlic, onion, green onion, ginger, and whole pepper. Each sample was prepared by cutting and thawing of 3-4 cm in size and 5–50 g in weight, under the same condition as in the raw material experiment. The only exception was garlic, which was roasted whole. The individual raw materials were each subjected to a convection oven process, then mixed together, and pressurised by heating at 121°C for 3 hours to prepare a key-based broth. The seasoning ingredients used in the finished product were pork bone extract (pork, pork bone enzyme decomposition), chicken, shiitake extract, and yeast extract. Seasonings were prepared by mixing these with the key-based broth followed by heat extraction. The samples were subjected to cooling and fat separation, and the extracted broths were filtered through 100-mesh strainer. Process and sample changes by roasting are shown in Figure1.Figure 1
Process and change in raw materials by convection heated roasting.


### 2.2. Reagents and Materials

GC-MS was used to analyse volatile components of the extract, and solid-phase microextraction (SPME) was used for the adsorption of aroma components. The injector liner was an SPME exclusive liner (2637505, Supelco, St. Louis, MO, USA), and the SPME fibre was an assembly polydimethylsiloxane/divinylbenzene (PDMS/DVB) fibre (Supelco, 57346U) that could absorb water-soluble and oil-soluble volatile substances universally.AA standards were prepared using the Agilent AA analysis method for AA standards (5061–3330; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and derivatisation reagents are as follows: ortho-phthalaldehyde for primary AA (Agilent, 5061–3335) and 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate for secondary AA (Agilent, 5061–3337). The AA standard is composed of the 20 natural AA and manufactured to a concentration of 1 nmol/µL. It was diluted two-fold and four-fold to prepare the standard working solutions. The following nucleotide standards were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) for use as reference standards: inosine 5′-monophosphate disodium salt hydrate (IMP; 57510) and guanosine 5′-monophosphate disodium salt hydrate (GMP; G8377). Stock solutions of 100 mg/L IMP and GMP were prepared by dissolving standards in distilled water and diluting to the required concentrations of 1, 5, 10, 25, and 50 mg/L to prepare standard working solutions.The mobile-phase solvents methanol and acetonitrile were of American Chemical Society grade and purchased from Honeywell (Charlotte, NC, USA). Reagent-grade perchloric acid, potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4), and sodium dihydrogen phosphate (NaH2PO4) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide were purchased from Junsei Chemical Co. (Tokyo, Japan). The distilled water had a resistivity of 18.2 MΩ.


### 2.3. Instrumental Conditions

GC-MS analysis was performed to screen the aroma components using an Agilent 7890 GC and Agilent 5975C TAD Series GC/MSD System and Agilent GC Sampler 80 G6501 B CTC PAL Gas Autosampler (Agilent Technologies). The method was developed for the analysis of volatile components of the extract as follows: the sample was transferred to a headspace vial, heated, and shaken at 500 rpm for 10 min at 50°C for headspace equilibration. A 24 Ga, 65μm PDMS/DVB SPME fibre (Supelco) was then inserted into the headspace, and volatile adsorption was performed. The extraction time and temperature were set to 30 min and 50°C, respectively. Once the volatiles were extracted, they were desorbed at 250°C for 1 min. After each injection, the SPME fibre was heated to 300°C under helium flow for 10 min. The liner used was an Inlet Liner, Direct SPME Type procured from Supelco. The splitless injection method was used; the GC column used was DB-WAX 60 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm procured from Agilent. The DB-WAX capillary column was used under the following conditions: the oven temperature was initially set at 40°C for 5 min, then increased to 60°C at a rate of 1°C/min, and maintained for 5 min. The temperature was then increased to 120°C at 10°C/min and maintained for 10 min. To avoid condensation, the interface temperature was set to 250°C. In the early development steps, an ionisation voltage of 70 eV and a mass range from 33 to 500 m/z for total ion chromatogram tracing were used. Volatile compounds were identified using the NIST10 spectral database, and linear retention indices were compared with those of the corresponding pure chemicals.A 1290 HPLC system (Agilent Technologies with a diode array detector (DAD)) was used for AA and nucleotide analyses. AAs were analysed according to Agilent's application note method [40], and nucleotides were determined in raw materials and sauces by applying the Association of Official Analytical Collaboration official method 2011.20 [41]. The optimised GC-MS and HPLC-DAD settings are listed in Table 1. The uncertainty provided with each value is an expanded uncertainty about the mean to cover the measurand with approximately 95% confidence (p < 0.05).Table 1
Operating conditions for detection of the aroma and umami taste components.
ParameterCondition(a) Aroma compounds (GC/MS-SPME)InstrumentAgilent 7890 GC and Agilent 5975C TAD series GC/MSD systemAgilent GC sampler 80 G6501 B CTC PAL gas autosamplerSPME conditionPreconditioning 50°C, 10 min, 500 rpmIncubation 50°C, 30 minSample extraction 250°C, 1 minColumnColumn: DB-WAX 60m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μmOven temp.40°C (5 min) > 1 °C/min >60°C (5 min) > 10 °C/min >120°C (10 min)MS interface temp.250°CMS modeScan, 22 to 500 m/z(b) Amino acid (HPLC-UVD).InstrumentAgilent 1290 high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detector (HPLC-UVD)Mobile phaseSolvent a = 40 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate (NaH2PO4), pH 7.8 buffer.SolventB = acetonitrile (ACN) : Methanol (MeOH) : Water (45 : 45 : 10)※ gradientTime (min)%A%B01000110009.8435710010012010012.51000141000Flow rate0.25 mL/minInjection volume1μLColumnAgilent Zorbax Eclipse AAA (4.6 m × 75 mmx 3.5 μm)Column temperature40°CDetector wavelength338 nmRun time14 min(c) Nucleotides (HPLC-UVD)InstrumentAgilent 1290 high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detector (HPLC-UVD)Mobile phaseSolvent a = potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4) 10 mM in water (pH 5.6 adjusted with 5 N potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution)SolventB = methanol 100%※ gradientTime (min)%A%B0100012.5901015802017.51000201000Flow rate0.6 mL/minInjection volume10μLColumnWaters SunFire C18 (4.6 mm × 250 mmx 5.0 μm)Column temperature40°CDetector wavelength254 nmRun time20 minGC/MS: gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; SPME: solid-phase microextraction, HPLC-UVD: high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detector, HPLC-UVD: high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detector.


## 2.1. Sample Preparation by Convection Heated Roasting Method

According to moisture and properties of vegetables and meat, heat treatment conditions were confirmed in a previous study. In the case of vegetables with a temperature condition of 250°C when heated for 20 min, the characteristic flavours of garlic, onion, and green onion were most superior. When heated for 10 minutes, a raw smell appeared, and when heated for 30 minutes, a burnt smell appeared. In the case of meat, it was confirmed that the rich roasted flavour of beef, pork, and chicken was well-expressed when heated for 50 min. When heated for 40 minutes, the roasted smell was weak, and when heated for 60 minutes, a burnt smell appeared. The above temperature conditions were applied when manufacturing all raw materials and for finished sauce products.For the test of raw materials, three types of agricultural products (onion, garlic, and green onion) and six types of livestock products (beef bone, pork bone, beef brisket, beef tendon, chicken feet, and chicken breast) were prepared by cutting and thawing. Each sample of 3–4 cm in size and 5–50 g in weight was subjected to a convection heated roasting or nonroasting condition. Of the raw materials, only garlic was roasted without cutting. After heating, they were mixed with purified water at a 1 : 10 ratio and the mixed solution was filtered and used for each instrument analysis.To test the sauce product, the selected materials among the above ingredients and spice ingredients were mixed and used in the preparation of the key-based broth. The selected materials were beef, pork, chicken, garlic, onion, green onion, ginger, and whole pepper. Each sample was prepared by cutting and thawing of 3-4 cm in size and 5–50 g in weight, under the same condition as in the raw material experiment. The only exception was garlic, which was roasted whole. The individual raw materials were each subjected to a convection oven process, then mixed together, and pressurised by heating at 121°C for 3 hours to prepare a key-based broth. The seasoning ingredients used in the finished product were pork bone extract (pork, pork bone enzyme decomposition), chicken, shiitake extract, and yeast extract. Seasonings were prepared by mixing these with the key-based broth followed by heat extraction. The samples were subjected to cooling and fat separation, and the extracted broths were filtered through 100-mesh strainer. Process and sample changes by roasting are shown in Figure1.Figure 1
Process and change in raw materials by convection heated roasting.


## 2.2. Reagents and Materials

GC-MS was used to analyse volatile components of the extract, and solid-phase microextraction (SPME) was used for the adsorption of aroma components. The injector liner was an SPME exclusive liner (2637505, Supelco, St. Louis, MO, USA), and the SPME fibre was an assembly polydimethylsiloxane/divinylbenzene (PDMS/DVB) fibre (Supelco, 57346U) that could absorb water-soluble and oil-soluble volatile substances universally.AA standards were prepared using the Agilent AA analysis method for AA standards (5061–3330; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and derivatisation reagents are as follows: ortho-phthalaldehyde for primary AA (Agilent, 5061–3335) and 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate for secondary AA (Agilent, 5061–3337). The AA standard is composed of the 20 natural AA and manufactured to a concentration of 1 nmol/µL. It was diluted two-fold and four-fold to prepare the standard working solutions. The following nucleotide standards were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) for use as reference standards: inosine 5′-monophosphate disodium salt hydrate (IMP; 57510) and guanosine 5′-monophosphate disodium salt hydrate (GMP; G8377). Stock solutions of 100 mg/L IMP and GMP were prepared by dissolving standards in distilled water and diluting to the required concentrations of 1, 5, 10, 25, and 50 mg/L to prepare standard working solutions.The mobile-phase solvents methanol and acetonitrile were of American Chemical Society grade and purchased from Honeywell (Charlotte, NC, USA). Reagent-grade perchloric acid, potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4), and sodium dihydrogen phosphate (NaH2PO4) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide were purchased from Junsei Chemical Co. (Tokyo, Japan). The distilled water had a resistivity of 18.2 MΩ.


## 2.3. Instrumental Conditions

GC-MS analysis was performed to screen the aroma components using an Agilent 7890 GC and Agilent 5975C TAD Series GC/MSD System and Agilent GC Sampler 80 G6501 B CTC PAL Gas Autosampler (Agilent Technologies). The method was developed for the analysis of volatile components of the extract as follows: the sample was transferred to a headspace vial, heated, and shaken at 500 rpm for 10 min at 50°C for headspace equilibration. A 24 Ga, 65μm PDMS/DVB SPME fibre (Supelco) was then inserted into the headspace, and volatile adsorption was performed. The extraction time and temperature were set to 30 min and 50°C, respectively. Once the volatiles were extracted, they were desorbed at 250°C for 1 min. After each injection, the SPME fibre was heated to 300°C under helium flow for 10 min. The liner used was an Inlet Liner, Direct SPME Type procured from Supelco. The splitless injection method was used; the GC column used was DB-WAX 60 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm procured from Agilent. The DB-WAX capillary column was used under the following conditions: the oven temperature was initially set at 40°C for 5 min, then increased to 60°C at a rate of 1°C/min, and maintained for 5 min. The temperature was then increased to 120°C at 10°C/min and maintained for 10 min. To avoid condensation, the interface temperature was set to 250°C. In the early development steps, an ionisation voltage of 70 eV and a mass range from 33 to 500 m/z for total ion chromatogram tracing were used. Volatile compounds were identified using the NIST10 spectral database, and linear retention indices were compared with those of the corresponding pure chemicals.A 1290 HPLC system (Agilent Technologies with a diode array detector (DAD)) was used for AA and nucleotide analyses. AAs were analysed according to Agilent's application note method [40], and nucleotides were determined in raw materials and sauces by applying the Association of Official Analytical Collaboration official method 2011.20 [41]. The optimised GC-MS and HPLC-DAD settings are listed in Table 1. The uncertainty provided with each value is an expanded uncertainty about the mean to cover the measurand with approximately 95% confidence (p < 0.05).Table 1
Operating conditions for detection of the aroma and umami taste components.
ParameterCondition(a) Aroma compounds (GC/MS-SPME)InstrumentAgilent 7890 GC and Agilent 5975C TAD series GC/MSD systemAgilent GC sampler 80 G6501 B CTC PAL gas autosamplerSPME conditionPreconditioning 50°C, 10 min, 500 rpmIncubation 50°C, 30 minSample extraction 250°C, 1 minColumnColumn: DB-WAX 60m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μmOven temp.40°C (5 min) > 1 °C/min >60°C (5 min) > 10 °C/min >120°C (10 min)MS interface temp.250°CMS modeScan, 22 to 500 m/z(b) Amino acid (HPLC-UVD).InstrumentAgilent 1290 high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detector (HPLC-UVD)Mobile phaseSolvent a = 40 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate (NaH2PO4), pH 7.8 buffer.SolventB = acetonitrile (ACN) : Methanol (MeOH) : Water (45 : 45 : 10)※ gradientTime (min)%A%B01000110009.8435710010012010012.51000141000Flow rate0.25 mL/minInjection volume1μLColumnAgilent Zorbax Eclipse AAA (4.6 m × 75 mmx 3.5 μm)Column temperature40°CDetector wavelength338 nmRun time14 min(c) Nucleotides (HPLC-UVD)InstrumentAgilent 1290 high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detector (HPLC-UVD)Mobile phaseSolvent a = potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4) 10 mM in water (pH 5.6 adjusted with 5 N potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution)SolventB = methanol 100%※ gradientTime (min)%A%B0100012.5901015802017.51000201000Flow rate0.6 mL/minInjection volume10μLColumnWaters SunFire C18 (4.6 mm × 250 mmx 5.0 μm)Column temperature40°CDetector wavelength254 nmRun time20 minGC/MS: gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; SPME: solid-phase microextraction, HPLC-UVD: high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detector, HPLC-UVD: high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detector.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Effect of Convection Heated Roasting on Raw Materials

To confirm flavour characteristics of raw material extracts using convection heated roasting, the changes in aroma and flavour component contents before and after roasting were compared and analysed. Samples were extracted and compared using the following two methods: (1) control—raw materials and (2) roasting—grilling materials using a convection oven process. Each sample was extracted with hot water at 98°C for 20 min for instrumental analysis. For the aroma analysis, the MS spectrum of the result peak was matched with the Wiley registry 9th Edition GC/MS Library and Nist 08 Library Spectra DB to derive results.


#### 3.1.1. Composition of Fragrance Components in Raw Materials Determined by GC-MS with SPME

Samples were green onion, shrimp, beef bone, garlic, clam, and chicken extract, and the aroma component increased during roasting extraction for all samples except the roasted chicken extract. Alcoholic compounds (such as hexanol and heptanol), alkane-based hydrocarbons (such as octane and decane), and aldehyde groups (such as nonanal and hexanal) were key ingredients of roasting in raw materials. When viewed individually, sulphide-based compounds (e.g., methyl sulphide and methyl allyl disulphide) were identified in green onion and garlic extracts. In addition, differences from the control were confirmed, such as fruit flavour, nut flavour, and components characteristically emitted from heated raw materials detected only in the convection oven and superheated steam. It was confirmed that the convection heated roasting method applying heat directly or indirectly affected the flavour of the extract.To develop a key base for sauce and soup dishes, SPME analysis was completed on 11 extracts, including green onion and three roasted extracts prepared using five raw materials, including beef bone, and the components detected in the results were organised and exported to databases. A total of 638 ingredients were summarised, among which a few representative ones are presented in Table2 with the ingredient name, CAS No., detection status, and peak area of ​​each extract.Table 2
Fragrance component composition by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry solid-phase microextraction analysis (GC-MS-SPME) (component name, CAS number, detection state, peak area).
Library compound nameCAS#Green onion extractGarlic extractBeef bone extractChicken bone extractNonroastingRoastingNonroastingRoastingNonroastingRoastingNonroastingRoastingHexanol000111-27-3-----10631-20067Heptanol000111-70-6---25801561019063923015125555Butanal00059-86-3-16159------Hexanal000066-25-1-32673--198326298789-1579467Heptanal000111-71-7----139990196425-183424Octanal000124-13-011813---88891157049-186542Nonenal002277-19-2-------110701Heptane000142-82-5--------Octane000111-65-9-----5128593944108699Decane000124-18-5----270527190413531869354858Dodecane000112-40-3----154636109759320471196023Methane, thiobis-(methyl sulphide)000075-18-34046532749------cis-Propenyl methyl disulphide (methyl allyl disulphide)005905-47-5-27017------Dimethyl trisulphide003658-80-8181848160-25851----Disulphide, di-2-propenyl002179-57-9--357458396027----Disulphide, methyl 2-propenyl002179-58-0--96447153590----


#### 3.1.2. Analysis of Changes in Umami Components in Raw Materials by Convection Heated Roasting

Representative ingredients of umami can be divided into AA and nucleic acids. AAs are widely distributed in animals and plants, whereas nucleic acids are known to be distributed in fish, meat, and some fungi (dried shiitake, matsutake mushrooms) [10, 11]. Three types of umami ingredients are shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
Types of umami ingredients—representative source and chemical structure.After roasting, the AA content of the three agricultural products increased from a minimum of 118% to a maximum of 509%, and it was confirmed that the total AA increase rate was approximately doubled. The AA content of the six types of livestock products increased from a minimum of 100% to a maximum of 141% based on the total AA content. It was estimated that the overall flavour of the raw materials could be efficiently extracted from agricultural products, and the extraction efficiency of livestock products was rated relatively low. The AA composition data are shown in Table3.Table 3
Comparison of amino acid composition of roasted and nonroasted raw materials.
(a) VegetablesOnion extractGarlic extractGreen onion extractNonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Glutamine4.0a8.92210.81.41812.04.3216Glutamic acid0.81.51942.42.91180.81.8225Glycine0.10.32310.20.21380.20.2134Leucine0.81.7222NDND—0.20.3168Lysine1.32.72041.83.61970.50.7153MethionineNDb0.1—NDND—NDND—Valine0.51.12380.40.51360.30.7248Serine0.41.33101.42.11471.32.5191CysteineNDND—0.40.9222NDND—Arginine3.47.121015.130.72040.51.0214Asparagine2.14.72231.72.11281.62.6163Aspartic acid0.61.82780.20.52740.61.1204Alanine0.50.81831.52.01361.42.8199Isoleucine0.30.72340.10.42930.10.1175Threonine0.31.02790.40.61680.20.5193Tryptophan0.30.82830.30.62330.10.3509Tyrosine0.61.52681.53.02020.41.0270Phenylalanine0.50.9163NDND—0.20.4190Proline0.20.63201.52.41594.85.0104Histidine0.61.52491.42.81910.10.2172Total free amino acids17.338.922531.056.718315.225.7169(b) MeatsBeef bone extractPork bone extractBeef brisket extractNonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)GlutamineNDND—0.30.2700.30.392Glutamic acid0.10.21220.20.2830.20.177Glycine0.1ND61ND0.3—0.70.686Leucine0.10.1870.70.7991.41.287Lysine0.2ND00.50.81451.61.386Methionine1.41.61132.61.9753.44.3124Valine0.20.31720.10.1980.40.496Serine0.10.1138ND0.5—1.31.183CysteineNDND—NDND—NDND—Arginine1.71.69310.510.610135.242.9122AsparagineNDND—NDND—0.50.490Aspartic acidNDND—NDND—NDND—Alanine0.40.3953.23.61133.70.00Isoleucine0.1ND0N0.4—0.40.493ThreonineNDND—0.20.1490.20.294TryptophanNDND—0.50.4780.10.180TyrosineNDND—0.30.2800.10.7594PhenylalanineNDND—0.30.51561.00.886Proline0.50.4830.90.8830.60.6103Histidine0.81.11505.25.51064.54.8106Total free amino acids5.85.810225.326.610555.560.2109Beef tendon extractChicken feet extractChicken breast extractNonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Glutamine0.10.11120.30.3981.01.1109Glutamic acid0.20.2870.20.21150.10.2163Glycine0.20.21180.6ND01.11.3115Leucine0.20.31890.81.01291.62.4152Lysine0.30.41092.30.293.03.8126Methionine2.54.41782.64.31684.55.0112Valine0.50.61290.30.31100.60.8142Serine0.20.41840.30.002.13.6173CysteineNDND—0.10.000.00.0—Arginine5.77.01236.86.08841.654.3130AsparagineND0.1—NDND—0.50.8155Aspartic acidNDND—NDND—NDND—Alanine1.52.61773.64.111214.214.4101Isoleucine0.10.22320.50.61150.30.278ThreonineND0.1—0.10.22240.20.2148TryptophanND0.4—0.2ND140.20.2119TyrosineND0.2—0.60.81341.10.19Phenylalanine0.20.21480.40.71831.11.8161Proline0.80.4501.81.4761.61.487Histidine2.22.81267.68.81177.910.4132Total free amino acids14.620.614129.129.010082.8102.2123aThe values are mean ± S.D. of three replications. bND : Not detected or low intensity under limit of detection.Analysis was not performed in agricultural products because no nucleic acid-based substances are present in them except mushrooms [11]. Analysis in mushrooms has been performed in previous studies; however, mushrooms were excluded from this study because the sensory quality deteriorated owing to the high temperature of the convection oven. Although mushrooms were not evaluated in this study, research on temperature conditions could be an important future task.As a result of the analysis of six kinds of livestock products, it was found that the increase was approximately two- to three-fold in beef brisket and chicken. It was estimated that the level of influence on fulfilment was negligible. Livestock products that showed the greatest effect with roasting were pork bone extract and beef tendon extract in this order, and other livestock products showed an effect of less than three times of the increase rate.Consequently, although the absolute content level was low, it was confirmed that the extraction efficiency of nucleotide-based components of livestock products during the roasting treatment was higher compared to when only water extraction was performed. The nucleotide composition data are shown in Table4.Table 4
Comparison of nucleotide (guanosine monophosphate and inosine monophosphate (GMP and IMP)) composition data of roasted and nonroasted meat raw materials.
Beef bone extractPork bone extractBeef brisket extractBeef tendon extractNonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)GMP0.013a0.0191490.0130.36527470.6301.2992060.0070.059794IMP0.0010.0011000.0010.348460874.96410.7122160.0180.2611467Total nucleotides0.0140.0201460.0140.71350765.59412.0112150.0250.3201270Chicken feet extractChicken breast extractNonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)GMP0.0070.0212791.0431.102111IMP0.0010.0011006.2566.906111Total nucleotides0.0080.0222637.2998.008111aThe values are mean ± S.D. of three replications.bND: not detected or low intensity under limit of detection.


### 3.2. Changes in Aroma and Taste Components in Mixed Sauces (Finished Products) with Convection Heated Roasting

To examine the levels of differences in the contents of aroma and taste components in mixed sauces (finished product) depending on whether the raw material was roasted, the finished product was compared and inspected by adding the broth base and seasoning. Raw materials were subjected to a convection oven process, and seasoning ingredients were used in the finished product. The separation of key-based broth and mixed sauce was designed so that it could be applied to various products in the future. In particular, in the case of the key-based broth, it was necessary to separately analyse it because it was prepared by targeting the richness of the aroma component rather than the absolute amount of the taste component.


#### 3.2.1. Changes in Mixed Sauce’s Aroma Composition

As described above, the dozens of aromas were observed in each sample. After selecting significant peaks by considering peak sensitivity of each compound among the massive data, overlapping compounds were sorted, and remarkable differences and commonalities could be identified. Regardless of roasting, the compounds that were commonly increased were pentadecane (waxy fat flavour), benzaldehyde (almond flavour), and 2-octylfuran (chocolate flavour). The compounds that were commonly decreased were 2-acetylthiazole (coriander leaf flavour), methylpyrazine (mould, ammonia flavour), and 3-methyl-butanal (dry fruit flavour, putrefactive flavour).In the case of roasting raw material, 1-propene (garlic flavour), eucalyptol (mint, refreshing flavour), and octanal (savoury fatty flavour) were observed as unique ingredients during roasting and are estimated to be positive flavour ingredients. The nonroasting raw material ingredients were 2, 5-dimethylpyrazine (bad smell stinging the nose), heptanal (aldehyde flavour), and 1-hexadecanol (bad oil flavour), which were estimated to be negative flavour ingredients.In the case of the mixed finished product sauce, 1-hexanol (sweet fruit flavour), decadienal (cooked beef, chicken flavour), and 3-(methylthio)-propanal (roasted meat and vegetable flavour) were observed as unique ingredients during roasting. They are positive fragrance ingredients. Pyridine (unpleasant fishy flavour), 1-heptanol (spicy flavour, heavy fat flavour), and pentanoic acid (unpleasant piggy flavour) were observed and were estimated to be negative flavour ingredients.On the one hand, in common aromas with roasting between the raw material and the finished product sauce, 2,6-dimethylpyrazine (roasted coffee and roasted barley flavour) and 2-furancarboxaldehyde (flavour from heated ingredients) were observed as unique ingredients, and they are estimated to be positive flavour ingredients. On the other hand, without roasting, ethanol (fermented spirit flavour) and nonanal (oily flavour) were observed as unique ingredients, and they were estimated to be negative fragrance ingredients. All aromas for the raw materials and products are schematised in Figure3.Figure 3
Composition of aroma components of raw material and mixed sauce according to roasting or nonroasting condition.


#### 3.2.2. Changes in the Umami Component of the Mixed Sauces

In the key-based samples (just a mix of raw materials), the total AA content increased by 24.1% during convection heated roasting, and glutamic acid, the umami component among AA, increased by 38.1%, indicating a high increase rate compared to the total AA. The key-based nucleotide-based flavour ingredients (GMP, IMP) increased by 5.9% in GMP, but decreased by 19.7% in IMP, indicating that the total amount of nucleotide-based ingredients decreased by 13.8%.In the finished product (mixed raw materials and seasoning ingredients), the total AA content increased by 5.8% during roasting, and glutamic acid content increased by 8.9%. In contrast, the nucleotide-based taste ingredients in the finished product were not significantly different as it increased by only 1%.Overall, AAs, including glutamic acid, were significantly increased by roasting and had an effect as an umami ingredient; however, in the case of nucleotide-based flavour ingredients, roasting had no significant effect. The taste composition of mixed sauce data is shown in Table5.sTable 5
Comparison of amino acid and nucleotide (guanosine monophosphate and inosine monophosphate (GMP, IMP)) composition of roasted and nonroasted mixed sauce products.
Key-based samplesFinished productsNonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)AverageSDAverageSDAverageSDAverageSDGlutamine0.2a0.4NDb0.0−100.00.90.91.31.343.6Glutamic acid5.21.27.10.738.1146.22.4159.32.08.9Glycine3.30.13.10.4−8.228.60.530.80.47.8Leucine0.10.20.90.1855.282.41.189.01.68.0Lysine2.10.33.00.443.454.11.957.92.57.1MethionineND—ND——15.40.216.90.29.5Valine1.80.62.71.051.153.90.758.90.99.2SerineND—1.60.3—50.00.653.21.26.2Cysteine0.30.50.30.3−11.91.31.70.30.1−76.2Arginine10.12.07.71.6−23.851.30.554.31.25.7Asparagine5.90.35.20.2−12.027.80.428.70.33.2Aspartic acidND—1.71.2—50.61.055.30.39.3Alanine13.00.314.91.115.2119.01.7128.22.07.7IsoleucineND—ND——39.80.743.50.99.4Threonine0.30.41.20.6261.334.60.537.70.59.0Tryptophan4.10.34.00.4−2.115.80.47.67.8−51.7TyrosineND—0.50.5—32.71.736.00.610.2Phenylalanine0.10.20.60.5477.048.50.752.81.28.7Proline4.00.37.60.089.457.46.750.410.1−12.3HistidineND—0.61.0—10.01.011.70.317.5Total free amino acids50.50.462.63.024.1920.411.3973.67.35.8GMP10.60.511.20.55.91171.617.11177.96.40.5IMP34.01.727.30.7−19.71643.623.71651.08.70.5GMP + IMP44.52.238.51.2−13.82815.140.82828.915.11.0aThe values are mean ± S.D. of three replications.bND: not detected or low intensity under limit of detection.


## 3.1. Effect of Convection Heated Roasting on Raw Materials

To confirm flavour characteristics of raw material extracts using convection heated roasting, the changes in aroma and flavour component contents before and after roasting were compared and analysed. Samples were extracted and compared using the following two methods: (1) control—raw materials and (2) roasting—grilling materials using a convection oven process. Each sample was extracted with hot water at 98°C for 20 min for instrumental analysis. For the aroma analysis, the MS spectrum of the result peak was matched with the Wiley registry 9th Edition GC/MS Library and Nist 08 Library Spectra DB to derive results.


### 3.1.1. Composition of Fragrance Components in Raw Materials Determined by GC-MS with SPME

Samples were green onion, shrimp, beef bone, garlic, clam, and chicken extract, and the aroma component increased during roasting extraction for all samples except the roasted chicken extract. Alcoholic compounds (such as hexanol and heptanol), alkane-based hydrocarbons (such as octane and decane), and aldehyde groups (such as nonanal and hexanal) were key ingredients of roasting in raw materials. When viewed individually, sulphide-based compounds (e.g., methyl sulphide and methyl allyl disulphide) were identified in green onion and garlic extracts. In addition, differences from the control were confirmed, such as fruit flavour, nut flavour, and components characteristically emitted from heated raw materials detected only in the convection oven and superheated steam. It was confirmed that the convection heated roasting method applying heat directly or indirectly affected the flavour of the extract.To develop a key base for sauce and soup dishes, SPME analysis was completed on 11 extracts, including green onion and three roasted extracts prepared using five raw materials, including beef bone, and the components detected in the results were organised and exported to databases. A total of 638 ingredients were summarised, among which a few representative ones are presented in Table2 with the ingredient name, CAS No., detection status, and peak area of ​​each extract.Table 2
Fragrance component composition by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry solid-phase microextraction analysis (GC-MS-SPME) (component name, CAS number, detection state, peak area).
Library compound nameCAS#Green onion extractGarlic extractBeef bone extractChicken bone extractNonroastingRoastingNonroastingRoastingNonroastingRoastingNonroastingRoastingHexanol000111-27-3-----10631-20067Heptanol000111-70-6---25801561019063923015125555Butanal00059-86-3-16159------Hexanal000066-25-1-32673--198326298789-1579467Heptanal000111-71-7----139990196425-183424Octanal000124-13-011813---88891157049-186542Nonenal002277-19-2-------110701Heptane000142-82-5--------Octane000111-65-9-----5128593944108699Decane000124-18-5----270527190413531869354858Dodecane000112-40-3----154636109759320471196023Methane, thiobis-(methyl sulphide)000075-18-34046532749------cis-Propenyl methyl disulphide (methyl allyl disulphide)005905-47-5-27017------Dimethyl trisulphide003658-80-8181848160-25851----Disulphide, di-2-propenyl002179-57-9--357458396027----Disulphide, methyl 2-propenyl002179-58-0--96447153590----


### 3.1.2. Analysis of Changes in Umami Components in Raw Materials by Convection Heated Roasting

Representative ingredients of umami can be divided into AA and nucleic acids. AAs are widely distributed in animals and plants, whereas nucleic acids are known to be distributed in fish, meat, and some fungi (dried shiitake, matsutake mushrooms) [10, 11]. Three types of umami ingredients are shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
Types of umami ingredients—representative source and chemical structure.After roasting, the AA content of the three agricultural products increased from a minimum of 118% to a maximum of 509%, and it was confirmed that the total AA increase rate was approximately doubled. The AA content of the six types of livestock products increased from a minimum of 100% to a maximum of 141% based on the total AA content. It was estimated that the overall flavour of the raw materials could be efficiently extracted from agricultural products, and the extraction efficiency of livestock products was rated relatively low. The AA composition data are shown in Table3.Table 3
Comparison of amino acid composition of roasted and nonroasted raw materials.
(a) VegetablesOnion extractGarlic extractGreen onion extractNonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Glutamine4.0a8.92210.81.41812.04.3216Glutamic acid0.81.51942.42.91180.81.8225Glycine0.10.32310.20.21380.20.2134Leucine0.81.7222NDND—0.20.3168Lysine1.32.72041.83.61970.50.7153MethionineNDb0.1—NDND—NDND—Valine0.51.12380.40.51360.30.7248Serine0.41.33101.42.11471.32.5191CysteineNDND—0.40.9222NDND—Arginine3.47.121015.130.72040.51.0214Asparagine2.14.72231.72.11281.62.6163Aspartic acid0.61.82780.20.52740.61.1204Alanine0.50.81831.52.01361.42.8199Isoleucine0.30.72340.10.42930.10.1175Threonine0.31.02790.40.61680.20.5193Tryptophan0.30.82830.30.62330.10.3509Tyrosine0.61.52681.53.02020.41.0270Phenylalanine0.50.9163NDND—0.20.4190Proline0.20.63201.52.41594.85.0104Histidine0.61.52491.42.81910.10.2172Total free amino acids17.338.922531.056.718315.225.7169(b) MeatsBeef bone extractPork bone extractBeef brisket extractNonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)GlutamineNDND—0.30.2700.30.392Glutamic acid0.10.21220.20.2830.20.177Glycine0.1ND61ND0.3—0.70.686Leucine0.10.1870.70.7991.41.287Lysine0.2ND00.50.81451.61.386Methionine1.41.61132.61.9753.44.3124Valine0.20.31720.10.1980.40.496Serine0.10.1138ND0.5—1.31.183CysteineNDND—NDND—NDND—Arginine1.71.69310.510.610135.242.9122AsparagineNDND—NDND—0.50.490Aspartic acidNDND—NDND—NDND—Alanine0.40.3953.23.61133.70.00Isoleucine0.1ND0N0.4—0.40.493ThreonineNDND—0.20.1490.20.294TryptophanNDND—0.50.4780.10.180TyrosineNDND—0.30.2800.10.7594PhenylalanineNDND—0.30.51561.00.886Proline0.50.4830.90.8830.60.6103Histidine0.81.11505.25.51064.54.8106Total free amino acids5.85.810225.326.610555.560.2109Beef tendon extractChicken feet extractChicken breast extractNonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Glutamine0.10.11120.30.3981.01.1109Glutamic acid0.20.2870.20.21150.10.2163Glycine0.20.21180.6ND01.11.3115Leucine0.20.31890.81.01291.62.4152Lysine0.30.41092.30.293.03.8126Methionine2.54.41782.64.31684.55.0112Valine0.50.61290.30.31100.60.8142Serine0.20.41840.30.002.13.6173CysteineNDND—0.10.000.00.0—Arginine5.77.01236.86.08841.654.3130AsparagineND0.1—NDND—0.50.8155Aspartic acidNDND—NDND—NDND—Alanine1.52.61773.64.111214.214.4101Isoleucine0.10.22320.50.61150.30.278ThreonineND0.1—0.10.22240.20.2148TryptophanND0.4—0.2ND140.20.2119TyrosineND0.2—0.60.81341.10.19Phenylalanine0.20.21480.40.71831.11.8161Proline0.80.4501.81.4761.61.487Histidine2.22.81267.68.81177.910.4132Total free amino acids14.620.614129.129.010082.8102.2123aThe values are mean ± S.D. of three replications. bND : Not detected or low intensity under limit of detection.Analysis was not performed in agricultural products because no nucleic acid-based substances are present in them except mushrooms [11]. Analysis in mushrooms has been performed in previous studies; however, mushrooms were excluded from this study because the sensory quality deteriorated owing to the high temperature of the convection oven. Although mushrooms were not evaluated in this study, research on temperature conditions could be an important future task.As a result of the analysis of six kinds of livestock products, it was found that the increase was approximately two- to three-fold in beef brisket and chicken. It was estimated that the level of influence on fulfilment was negligible. Livestock products that showed the greatest effect with roasting were pork bone extract and beef tendon extract in this order, and other livestock products showed an effect of less than three times of the increase rate.Consequently, although the absolute content level was low, it was confirmed that the extraction efficiency of nucleotide-based components of livestock products during the roasting treatment was higher compared to when only water extraction was performed. The nucleotide composition data are shown in Table4.Table 4
Comparison of nucleotide (guanosine monophosphate and inosine monophosphate (GMP and IMP)) composition data of roasted and nonroasted meat raw materials.
Beef bone extractPork bone extractBeef brisket extractBeef tendon extractNonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)GMP0.013a0.0191490.0130.36527470.6301.2992060.0070.059794IMP0.0010.0011000.0010.348460874.96410.7122160.0180.2611467Total nucleotides0.0140.0201460.0140.71350765.59412.0112150.0250.3201270Chicken feet extractChicken breast extractNonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)GMP0.0070.0212791.0431.102111IMP0.0010.0011006.2566.906111Total nucleotides0.0080.0222637.2998.008111aThe values are mean ± S.D. of three replications.bND: not detected or low intensity under limit of detection.


## 3.1.1. Composition of Fragrance Components in Raw Materials Determined by GC-MS with SPME

Samples were green onion, shrimp, beef bone, garlic, clam, and chicken extract, and the aroma component increased during roasting extraction for all samples except the roasted chicken extract. Alcoholic compounds (such as hexanol and heptanol), alkane-based hydrocarbons (such as octane and decane), and aldehyde groups (such as nonanal and hexanal) were key ingredients of roasting in raw materials. When viewed individually, sulphide-based compounds (e.g., methyl sulphide and methyl allyl disulphide) were identified in green onion and garlic extracts. In addition, differences from the control were confirmed, such as fruit flavour, nut flavour, and components characteristically emitted from heated raw materials detected only in the convection oven and superheated steam. It was confirmed that the convection heated roasting method applying heat directly or indirectly affected the flavour of the extract.To develop a key base for sauce and soup dishes, SPME analysis was completed on 11 extracts, including green onion and three roasted extracts prepared using five raw materials, including beef bone, and the components detected in the results were organised and exported to databases. A total of 638 ingredients were summarised, among which a few representative ones are presented in Table2 with the ingredient name, CAS No., detection status, and peak area of ​​each extract.Table 2
Fragrance component composition by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry solid-phase microextraction analysis (GC-MS-SPME) (component name, CAS number, detection state, peak area).
Library compound nameCAS#Green onion extractGarlic extractBeef bone extractChicken bone extractNonroastingRoastingNonroastingRoastingNonroastingRoastingNonroastingRoastingHexanol000111-27-3-----10631-20067Heptanol000111-70-6---25801561019063923015125555Butanal00059-86-3-16159------Hexanal000066-25-1-32673--198326298789-1579467Heptanal000111-71-7----139990196425-183424Octanal000124-13-011813---88891157049-186542Nonenal002277-19-2-------110701Heptane000142-82-5--------Octane000111-65-9-----5128593944108699Decane000124-18-5----270527190413531869354858Dodecane000112-40-3----154636109759320471196023Methane, thiobis-(methyl sulphide)000075-18-34046532749------cis-Propenyl methyl disulphide (methyl allyl disulphide)005905-47-5-27017------Dimethyl trisulphide003658-80-8181848160-25851----Disulphide, di-2-propenyl002179-57-9--357458396027----Disulphide, methyl 2-propenyl002179-58-0--96447153590----


## 3.1.2. Analysis of Changes in Umami Components in Raw Materials by Convection Heated Roasting

Representative ingredients of umami can be divided into AA and nucleic acids. AAs are widely distributed in animals and plants, whereas nucleic acids are known to be distributed in fish, meat, and some fungi (dried shiitake, matsutake mushrooms) [10, 11]. Three types of umami ingredients are shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
Types of umami ingredients—representative source and chemical structure.After roasting, the AA content of the three agricultural products increased from a minimum of 118% to a maximum of 509%, and it was confirmed that the total AA increase rate was approximately doubled. The AA content of the six types of livestock products increased from a minimum of 100% to a maximum of 141% based on the total AA content. It was estimated that the overall flavour of the raw materials could be efficiently extracted from agricultural products, and the extraction efficiency of livestock products was rated relatively low. The AA composition data are shown in Table3.Table 3
Comparison of amino acid composition of roasted and nonroasted raw materials.
(a) VegetablesOnion extractGarlic extractGreen onion extractNonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Glutamine4.0a8.92210.81.41812.04.3216Glutamic acid0.81.51942.42.91180.81.8225Glycine0.10.32310.20.21380.20.2134Leucine0.81.7222NDND—0.20.3168Lysine1.32.72041.83.61970.50.7153MethionineNDb0.1—NDND—NDND—Valine0.51.12380.40.51360.30.7248Serine0.41.33101.42.11471.32.5191CysteineNDND—0.40.9222NDND—Arginine3.47.121015.130.72040.51.0214Asparagine2.14.72231.72.11281.62.6163Aspartic acid0.61.82780.20.52740.61.1204Alanine0.50.81831.52.01361.42.8199Isoleucine0.30.72340.10.42930.10.1175Threonine0.31.02790.40.61680.20.5193Tryptophan0.30.82830.30.62330.10.3509Tyrosine0.61.52681.53.02020.41.0270Phenylalanine0.50.9163NDND—0.20.4190Proline0.20.63201.52.41594.85.0104Histidine0.61.52491.42.81910.10.2172Total free amino acids17.338.922531.056.718315.225.7169(b) MeatsBeef bone extractPork bone extractBeef brisket extractNonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)GlutamineNDND—0.30.2700.30.392Glutamic acid0.10.21220.20.2830.20.177Glycine0.1ND61ND0.3—0.70.686Leucine0.10.1870.70.7991.41.287Lysine0.2ND00.50.81451.61.386Methionine1.41.61132.61.9753.44.3124Valine0.20.31720.10.1980.40.496Serine0.10.1138ND0.5—1.31.183CysteineNDND—NDND—NDND—Arginine1.71.69310.510.610135.242.9122AsparagineNDND—NDND—0.50.490Aspartic acidNDND—NDND—NDND—Alanine0.40.3953.23.61133.70.00Isoleucine0.1ND0N0.4—0.40.493ThreonineNDND—0.20.1490.20.294TryptophanNDND—0.50.4780.10.180TyrosineNDND—0.30.2800.10.7594PhenylalanineNDND—0.30.51561.00.886Proline0.50.4830.90.8830.60.6103Histidine0.81.11505.25.51064.54.8106Total free amino acids5.85.810225.326.610555.560.2109Beef tendon extractChicken feet extractChicken breast extractNonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Glutamine0.10.11120.30.3981.01.1109Glutamic acid0.20.2870.20.21150.10.2163Glycine0.20.21180.6ND01.11.3115Leucine0.20.31890.81.01291.62.4152Lysine0.30.41092.30.293.03.8126Methionine2.54.41782.64.31684.55.0112Valine0.50.61290.30.31100.60.8142Serine0.20.41840.30.002.13.6173CysteineNDND—0.10.000.00.0—Arginine5.77.01236.86.08841.654.3130AsparagineND0.1—NDND—0.50.8155Aspartic acidNDND—NDND—NDND—Alanine1.52.61773.64.111214.214.4101Isoleucine0.10.22320.50.61150.30.278ThreonineND0.1—0.10.22240.20.2148TryptophanND0.4—0.2ND140.20.2119TyrosineND0.2—0.60.81341.10.19Phenylalanine0.20.21480.40.71831.11.8161Proline0.80.4501.81.4761.61.487Histidine2.22.81267.68.81177.910.4132Total free amino acids14.620.614129.129.010082.8102.2123aThe values are mean ± S.D. of three replications. bND : Not detected or low intensity under limit of detection.Analysis was not performed in agricultural products because no nucleic acid-based substances are present in them except mushrooms [11]. Analysis in mushrooms has been performed in previous studies; however, mushrooms were excluded from this study because the sensory quality deteriorated owing to the high temperature of the convection oven. Although mushrooms were not evaluated in this study, research on temperature conditions could be an important future task.As a result of the analysis of six kinds of livestock products, it was found that the increase was approximately two- to three-fold in beef brisket and chicken. It was estimated that the level of influence on fulfilment was negligible. Livestock products that showed the greatest effect with roasting were pork bone extract and beef tendon extract in this order, and other livestock products showed an effect of less than three times of the increase rate.Consequently, although the absolute content level was low, it was confirmed that the extraction efficiency of nucleotide-based components of livestock products during the roasting treatment was higher compared to when only water extraction was performed. The nucleotide composition data are shown in Table4.Table 4
Comparison of nucleotide (guanosine monophosphate and inosine monophosphate (GMP and IMP)) composition data of roasted and nonroasted meat raw materials.
Beef bone extractPork bone extractBeef brisket extractBeef tendon extractNonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)GMP0.013a0.0191490.0130.36527470.6301.2992060.0070.059794IMP0.0010.0011000.0010.348460874.96410.7122160.0180.2611467Total nucleotides0.0140.0201460.0140.71350765.59412.0112150.0250.3201270Chicken feet extractChicken breast extractNonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)GMP0.0070.0212791.0431.102111IMP0.0010.0011006.2566.906111Total nucleotides0.0080.0222637.2998.008111aThe values are mean ± S.D. of three replications.bND: not detected or low intensity under limit of detection.


## 3.2. Changes in Aroma and Taste Components in Mixed Sauces (Finished Products) with Convection Heated Roasting

To examine the levels of differences in the contents of aroma and taste components in mixed sauces (finished product) depending on whether the raw material was roasted, the finished product was compared and inspected by adding the broth base and seasoning. Raw materials were subjected to a convection oven process, and seasoning ingredients were used in the finished product. The separation of key-based broth and mixed sauce was designed so that it could be applied to various products in the future. In particular, in the case of the key-based broth, it was necessary to separately analyse it because it was prepared by targeting the richness of the aroma component rather than the absolute amount of the taste component.


### 3.2.1. Changes in Mixed Sauce’s Aroma Composition

As described above, the dozens of aromas were observed in each sample. After selecting significant peaks by considering peak sensitivity of each compound among the massive data, overlapping compounds were sorted, and remarkable differences and commonalities could be identified. Regardless of roasting, the compounds that were commonly increased were pentadecane (waxy fat flavour), benzaldehyde (almond flavour), and 2-octylfuran (chocolate flavour). The compounds that were commonly decreased were 2-acetylthiazole (coriander leaf flavour), methylpyrazine (mould, ammonia flavour), and 3-methyl-butanal (dry fruit flavour, putrefactive flavour).In the case of roasting raw material, 1-propene (garlic flavour), eucalyptol (mint, refreshing flavour), and octanal (savoury fatty flavour) were observed as unique ingredients during roasting and are estimated to be positive flavour ingredients. The nonroasting raw material ingredients were 2, 5-dimethylpyrazine (bad smell stinging the nose), heptanal (aldehyde flavour), and 1-hexadecanol (bad oil flavour), which were estimated to be negative flavour ingredients.In the case of the mixed finished product sauce, 1-hexanol (sweet fruit flavour), decadienal (cooked beef, chicken flavour), and 3-(methylthio)-propanal (roasted meat and vegetable flavour) were observed as unique ingredients during roasting. They are positive fragrance ingredients. Pyridine (unpleasant fishy flavour), 1-heptanol (spicy flavour, heavy fat flavour), and pentanoic acid (unpleasant piggy flavour) were observed and were estimated to be negative flavour ingredients.On the one hand, in common aromas with roasting between the raw material and the finished product sauce, 2,6-dimethylpyrazine (roasted coffee and roasted barley flavour) and 2-furancarboxaldehyde (flavour from heated ingredients) were observed as unique ingredients, and they are estimated to be positive flavour ingredients. On the other hand, without roasting, ethanol (fermented spirit flavour) and nonanal (oily flavour) were observed as unique ingredients, and they were estimated to be negative fragrance ingredients. All aromas for the raw materials and products are schematised in Figure3.Figure 3
Composition of aroma components of raw material and mixed sauce according to roasting or nonroasting condition.


### 3.2.2. Changes in the Umami Component of the Mixed Sauces

In the key-based samples (just a mix of raw materials), the total AA content increased by 24.1% during convection heated roasting, and glutamic acid, the umami component among AA, increased by 38.1%, indicating a high increase rate compared to the total AA. The key-based nucleotide-based flavour ingredients (GMP, IMP) increased by 5.9% in GMP, but decreased by 19.7% in IMP, indicating that the total amount of nucleotide-based ingredients decreased by 13.8%.In the finished product (mixed raw materials and seasoning ingredients), the total AA content increased by 5.8% during roasting, and glutamic acid content increased by 8.9%. In contrast, the nucleotide-based taste ingredients in the finished product were not significantly different as it increased by only 1%.Overall, AAs, including glutamic acid, were significantly increased by roasting and had an effect as an umami ingredient; however, in the case of nucleotide-based flavour ingredients, roasting had no significant effect. The taste composition of mixed sauce data is shown in Table5.sTable 5
Comparison of amino acid and nucleotide (guanosine monophosphate and inosine monophosphate (GMP, IMP)) composition of roasted and nonroasted mixed sauce products.
Key-based samplesFinished productsNonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)AverageSDAverageSDAverageSDAverageSDGlutamine0.2a0.4NDb0.0−100.00.90.91.31.343.6Glutamic acid5.21.27.10.738.1146.22.4159.32.08.9Glycine3.30.13.10.4−8.228.60.530.80.47.8Leucine0.10.20.90.1855.282.41.189.01.68.0Lysine2.10.33.00.443.454.11.957.92.57.1MethionineND—ND——15.40.216.90.29.5Valine1.80.62.71.051.153.90.758.90.99.2SerineND—1.60.3—50.00.653.21.26.2Cysteine0.30.50.30.3−11.91.31.70.30.1−76.2Arginine10.12.07.71.6−23.851.30.554.31.25.7Asparagine5.90.35.20.2−12.027.80.428.70.33.2Aspartic acidND—1.71.2—50.61.055.30.39.3Alanine13.00.314.91.115.2119.01.7128.22.07.7IsoleucineND—ND——39.80.743.50.99.4Threonine0.30.41.20.6261.334.60.537.70.59.0Tryptophan4.10.34.00.4−2.115.80.47.67.8−51.7TyrosineND—0.50.5—32.71.736.00.610.2Phenylalanine0.10.20.60.5477.048.50.752.81.28.7Proline4.00.37.60.089.457.46.750.410.1−12.3HistidineND—0.61.0—10.01.011.70.317.5Total free amino acids50.50.462.63.024.1920.411.3973.67.35.8GMP10.60.511.20.55.91171.617.11177.96.40.5IMP34.01.727.30.7−19.71643.623.71651.08.70.5GMP + IMP44.52.238.51.2−13.82815.140.82828.915.11.0aThe values are mean ± S.D. of three replications.bND: not detected or low intensity under limit of detection.


## 3.2.1. Changes in Mixed Sauce’s Aroma Composition

As described above, the dozens of aromas were observed in each sample. After selecting significant peaks by considering peak sensitivity of each compound among the massive data, overlapping compounds were sorted, and remarkable differences and commonalities could be identified. Regardless of roasting, the compounds that were commonly increased were pentadecane (waxy fat flavour), benzaldehyde (almond flavour), and 2-octylfuran (chocolate flavour). The compounds that were commonly decreased were 2-acetylthiazole (coriander leaf flavour), methylpyrazine (mould, ammonia flavour), and 3-methyl-butanal (dry fruit flavour, putrefactive flavour).In the case of roasting raw material, 1-propene (garlic flavour), eucalyptol (mint, refreshing flavour), and octanal (savoury fatty flavour) were observed as unique ingredients during roasting and are estimated to be positive flavour ingredients. The nonroasting raw material ingredients were 2, 5-dimethylpyrazine (bad smell stinging the nose), heptanal (aldehyde flavour), and 1-hexadecanol (bad oil flavour), which were estimated to be negative flavour ingredients.In the case of the mixed finished product sauce, 1-hexanol (sweet fruit flavour), decadienal (cooked beef, chicken flavour), and 3-(methylthio)-propanal (roasted meat and vegetable flavour) were observed as unique ingredients during roasting. They are positive fragrance ingredients. Pyridine (unpleasant fishy flavour), 1-heptanol (spicy flavour, heavy fat flavour), and pentanoic acid (unpleasant piggy flavour) were observed and were estimated to be negative flavour ingredients.On the one hand, in common aromas with roasting between the raw material and the finished product sauce, 2,6-dimethylpyrazine (roasted coffee and roasted barley flavour) and 2-furancarboxaldehyde (flavour from heated ingredients) were observed as unique ingredients, and they are estimated to be positive flavour ingredients. On the other hand, without roasting, ethanol (fermented spirit flavour) and nonanal (oily flavour) were observed as unique ingredients, and they were estimated to be negative fragrance ingredients. All aromas for the raw materials and products are schematised in Figure3.Figure 3
Composition of aroma components of raw material and mixed sauce according to roasting or nonroasting condition.


## 3.2.2. Changes in the Umami Component of the Mixed Sauces

In the key-based samples (just a mix of raw materials), the total AA content increased by 24.1% during convection heated roasting, and glutamic acid, the umami component among AA, increased by 38.1%, indicating a high increase rate compared to the total AA. The key-based nucleotide-based flavour ingredients (GMP, IMP) increased by 5.9% in GMP, but decreased by 19.7% in IMP, indicating that the total amount of nucleotide-based ingredients decreased by 13.8%.In the finished product (mixed raw materials and seasoning ingredients), the total AA content increased by 5.8% during roasting, and glutamic acid content increased by 8.9%. In contrast, the nucleotide-based taste ingredients in the finished product were not significantly different as it increased by only 1%.Overall, AAs, including glutamic acid, were significantly increased by roasting and had an effect as an umami ingredient; however, in the case of nucleotide-based flavour ingredients, roasting had no significant effect. The taste composition of mixed sauce data is shown in Table5.sTable 5
Comparison of amino acid and nucleotide (guanosine monophosphate and inosine monophosphate (GMP, IMP)) composition of roasted and nonroasted mixed sauce products.
Key-based samplesFinished productsNonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)Nonroasting (mg/100 g)Roasting (mg/100 g)Rate of increase (%)AverageSDAverageSDAverageSDAverageSDGlutamine0.2a0.4NDb0.0−100.00.90.91.31.343.6Glutamic acid5.21.27.10.738.1146.22.4159.32.08.9Glycine3.30.13.10.4−8.228.60.530.80.47.8Leucine0.10.20.90.1855.282.41.189.01.68.0Lysine2.10.33.00.443.454.11.957.92.57.1MethionineND—ND——15.40.216.90.29.5Valine1.80.62.71.051.153.90.758.90.99.2SerineND—1.60.3—50.00.653.21.26.2Cysteine0.30.50.30.3−11.91.31.70.30.1−76.2Arginine10.12.07.71.6−23.851.30.554.31.25.7Asparagine5.90.35.20.2−12.027.80.428.70.33.2Aspartic acidND—1.71.2—50.61.055.30.39.3Alanine13.00.314.91.115.2119.01.7128.22.07.7IsoleucineND—ND——39.80.743.50.99.4Threonine0.30.41.20.6261.334.60.537.70.59.0Tryptophan4.10.34.00.4−2.115.80.47.67.8−51.7TyrosineND—0.50.5—32.71.736.00.610.2Phenylalanine0.10.20.60.5477.048.50.752.81.28.7Proline4.00.37.60.089.457.46.750.410.1−12.3HistidineND—0.61.0—10.01.011.70.317.5Total free amino acids50.50.462.63.024.1920.411.3973.67.35.8GMP10.60.511.20.55.91171.617.11177.96.40.5IMP34.01.727.30.7−19.71643.623.71651.08.70.5GMP + IMP44.52.238.51.2−13.82815.140.82828.915.11.0aThe values are mean ± S.D. of three replications.bND: not detected or low intensity under limit of detection.


## 4. Conclusions

Vegetables, meat, and mixed extracted sauces were subjected to roasting in a convection oven, and the focus was on observing the changes in aroma and taste components (particularly umami). In the case of key-based samples (raw material extracts), the total AA and glutamic acid contents increased to 24.1–38.1% owing to convection heated roasting. Aroma compounds that were increased included 1-propene (garlic), eucalyptol (mint, refreshing flavour), octanal (savoury fat flavour), pentadecane (waxy fat flavour), benzaldehyde (typical almond flavour), and 2-octylfuran (chocolate flavour). These were scents that were evaluated as positive aromas. In the case of the finished product (key-based sample + seasoning ingredients), the total AA and glutamic acid contents slightly increased to 5.8–8.9%. By contrast, positive aromas were newly created or increased after roasting as follows: 1-hexanol (sweet fruit flavour), decadienal (cooking flavours evaluated as positive aromas such as beef and chicken), propanal, 3-(methylthio) (roast meat and vegetables), pentadecane (waxy fat flavour), benzaldehyde (typical almond flavour), and 2-Octylfuran (chocolate flavour). In the case of nucleotide-based taste components, there was no significant increase in the content. The positive effects of the convection heated roasting extraction are summarised in Figure4.Figure 4
Summarised positive effects of convection heated roasting extraction in sauce products.n conclusion, it was demonstrated that the application of novel convection heated roasting techniques for raw vegetable and meat materials, whether alone or in combination with traditional hot water extraction, had a positive effect for good aroma and increasing taste of umami. Through the extraction conditions and techniques described in this study, it will be possible to improve the quality of finished products related to the production of sauces. It will also be helpful for basic research activities that can improve the flavour and taste of raw materials. In this study, we measured an increase in the content of useful components in raw materials and final products or positive changes in fragrance components. The present findings contribute immensely to the food industry as the enhancement of taste and aroma could help with the production of more palatable foods as desired by food consumers, thereby increasing the sales of nutritious foods that otherwise consumers may not buy. However, there was a limitation in this study, because quantitative measurement of the fragrance component was not performed and it was merely observing a positive fragrance. In future scientific studies, sensory evaluations need to be performed using electronic nose and electronic tongue devices combined with the traditional sensory evaluation. Further research on roasting techniques is also required.



---

*Source: 7690831-2022-02-25.xml*