# Investigating the Phytochemicals and Antimicrobial Activities of Shoot and Root ofPycreus smithianus (Ridl.) C. B. Clarke (Family Cyperaceae)

Authors: P. A. Adeonipekun; T. A. Adeniyi; S. O. Aminu
Journal: Journal of Botany
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

Pycreus smithianus tubers have been reported to have insecticidal properties. To gain further insight into its medicinal values, phytochemical and antimicrobial studies were carried out on its shoot and root. The phytochemical screening indicated the presence of reducing sugars, tannins, flavonoids, terpenoids, cardiac glycosides, and saponins in varying quantities as well as absence of steroids and alkaloids. Aqueous and ethanolic extracts (shoot and root) were tested against two fungi—Aspergillus niger and Candida albicans—and two bacteria—Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella typhi. Antimicrobial activity evaluation was carried out at 50 and 100 mg/mL concentrations by Agar Well Diffusion method. From the antimicrobial evaluation, the root ethanolic extract at 100% concentration was the most effective against S. aureus and C. albicans while the shoot ethanolic extract was effective against S. typhi. No extract was active against A. niger. Ethanolic extracts were more active than the aqueous extracts and showed higher inhibitory activity against the bacteria than the fungi. This is most likely due to the abundance of reducing sugars in the ethanolic extracts. From these findings, ethanolic extracts of the root of P. smithianus exhibited a good potential source of new drug for treating infections caused by these pathogens and particularly drug resistant C. albicans.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

It is no longer new that traditional medicine is increasingly becoming more popular than before. More than 80% of Nigerians use herbs for common ailments, not only because of the poor healthcare system in the country, but due to their relative availability and significance in primary health care cost [1] as well as the recent increasing media attention and campaign. Iwu et al. [2] remarked that the relative safety of herbal medicines also makes them more popular than synthetic drugs while Elujoba et al. [3] emphasized their significance in global primary healthcare. One of the most readily available plants, often neglected being a weed, isPycreus smithianusof the family Cyperaceae.Pycreus smithianusRidley is a common weed of cultivated areas, moist places, and waste lands in Nigeria and West Africa [4]. Its inflorescence is a compact head type, 2 cm across, subtended by 3 or 4 conspicuous bracts. Its leaves are numerous, usually shorter than the flowering stems with 2–4 mm width. The plant is much tufted with fibrous roots, 15–45 cm tall, with the base of each stem often swollen. Apart from the tubers reported to possess aromatic substances used as insecticides and arachnicides [5], little or nothing is available on its medicinal values.The aim of this work therefore is to evaluate the medicinal values of the shoot and root ofP. smithianusthrough phytochemistry and antimicrobial studies.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Sample Source

P. smithianusplant was collected within the University of Lagos, Akoka Campus, Lagos, Nigeria. Taxonomic identification and confirmation were carried out at the University of Lagos Herbarium (LUH). The test fungi,Aspergillus niger andCandida albicans, and bacteria,Staphylococcus aureus andSalmonella typhi, were sourced from the Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacy Microbiology Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba Campus, Lagos, Nigeria. Saboraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) was used to maintain the fungi while the bacteria strains were maintained on Mueller Hinton (MH) agar both at 4°C.


### 2.2. Preparation of Plant Extracts

Plant materials were cut into pieces and oven-dried at 40°C (to avoid the loss of volatiles) for the period of one week. Dried samples were pulverized. To prepare the extracts, 100 g of pulverized plant materials (root and shoot) was weighed and soaked in 500 mL of ethanol and distilled water in four sterilized conical flasks and left for 48 hours. Whatman number 1 filter paper was used to filter the extracts and filtrates were concentrated under vacuum below 40°C using rotary evaporator to a volume of 10 mL [6].


### 2.3. Phytochemical Analysis

The phytochemical constituents of the plant samples (root and shoot) were screened qualitatively and quantitatively using the methods described by Harborne [7]. Screening involved tests for reducing sugars, alkaloids, cardiac glycosides, saponins, tannins, flavonoids, steroids, and terpenoids.


### 2.4. Antibacterial Assay

Agar Well Diffusion test method of Radhika and Aneja [8] was employed for both antibacterial and antifungal activity tests. Ten milliliters of Mueller Hinton (MH) agar was poured into sterile petri dishes (9 cm) and allowed to set for the preparation of base plates. Molten MH agar held at 48°C was inoculated with a broth culture (103 and 104 bacteria per millilitre) of test organism and poured over the base plates forming homogenous top layer. A cup borer of 9 mm was used to bore holes. Two concentrations, 100% and 50%, were prepared. To prepare 100% concentration, 5 mL of the extract was used while to prepare 50% concentration, 5 mL of the extract was diluted into two volumes (water for aqueous extract and ethanol for ethanolic extract). 0.2 mL of plant extracts was pippeted into the created well. This was repeated for plant parts’ extracts and the controls. Two controls, ciprofloxacin and sterile distilled water, were used.Ciprofloxacin was also made into concentrations of 100% and 50% using half and full tablets. The plates were kept at room temperature for about 15 minutes and incubating was done at 37°C for 24 hours. Then the ratio of the inhibition zone (mm) produced by the extracts and the inhibition zone around the ciprofloxacin reference (mm) was used to express antibacterial activity.


### 2.5. Antifungal Assay

Ten milliliters of Saboraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) was poured into petri dishes and allowed to solidify. Liquid inoculum was prepared by pouring cool sterile distilled water on already grown fungal plates. The suspension was then transferred into a test tube. This was done in order to make the spores easily removable from the pure culture. Serial dilution from 10−1, 10−2, 10−3, and 10−4 was then carried out. A syringe was used to transfer 0.5 mL of the aliquots into each of the plates. A sterile rod was used to gently stir the spores for even distribution in the plates. The same cup boring process as done for the bacteria was followed. Two controls, clotrimazole and sterile distilled water, were used. Clotrimazole was also made into concentrations of 100% and 50% using half and full tablets. All the plates containing the extracts and fungi were incubated at 25°C after which the zones of inhibition were measured after 48 hours of incubation [8].


## 2.1. Sample Source

P. smithianusplant was collected within the University of Lagos, Akoka Campus, Lagos, Nigeria. Taxonomic identification and confirmation were carried out at the University of Lagos Herbarium (LUH). The test fungi,Aspergillus niger andCandida albicans, and bacteria,Staphylococcus aureus andSalmonella typhi, were sourced from the Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacy Microbiology Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba Campus, Lagos, Nigeria. Saboraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) was used to maintain the fungi while the bacteria strains were maintained on Mueller Hinton (MH) agar both at 4°C.


## 2.2. Preparation of Plant Extracts

Plant materials were cut into pieces and oven-dried at 40°C (to avoid the loss of volatiles) for the period of one week. Dried samples were pulverized. To prepare the extracts, 100 g of pulverized plant materials (root and shoot) was weighed and soaked in 500 mL of ethanol and distilled water in four sterilized conical flasks and left for 48 hours. Whatman number 1 filter paper was used to filter the extracts and filtrates were concentrated under vacuum below 40°C using rotary evaporator to a volume of 10 mL [6].


## 2.3. Phytochemical Analysis

The phytochemical constituents of the plant samples (root and shoot) were screened qualitatively and quantitatively using the methods described by Harborne [7]. Screening involved tests for reducing sugars, alkaloids, cardiac glycosides, saponins, tannins, flavonoids, steroids, and terpenoids.


## 2.4. Antibacterial Assay

Agar Well Diffusion test method of Radhika and Aneja [8] was employed for both antibacterial and antifungal activity tests. Ten milliliters of Mueller Hinton (MH) agar was poured into sterile petri dishes (9 cm) and allowed to set for the preparation of base plates. Molten MH agar held at 48°C was inoculated with a broth culture (103 and 104 bacteria per millilitre) of test organism and poured over the base plates forming homogenous top layer. A cup borer of 9 mm was used to bore holes. Two concentrations, 100% and 50%, were prepared. To prepare 100% concentration, 5 mL of the extract was used while to prepare 50% concentration, 5 mL of the extract was diluted into two volumes (water for aqueous extract and ethanol for ethanolic extract). 0.2 mL of plant extracts was pippeted into the created well. This was repeated for plant parts’ extracts and the controls. Two controls, ciprofloxacin and sterile distilled water, were used.Ciprofloxacin was also made into concentrations of 100% and 50% using half and full tablets. The plates were kept at room temperature for about 15 minutes and incubating was done at 37°C for 24 hours. Then the ratio of the inhibition zone (mm) produced by the extracts and the inhibition zone around the ciprofloxacin reference (mm) was used to express antibacterial activity.


## 2.5. Antifungal Assay

Ten milliliters of Saboraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) was poured into petri dishes and allowed to solidify. Liquid inoculum was prepared by pouring cool sterile distilled water on already grown fungal plates. The suspension was then transferred into a test tube. This was done in order to make the spores easily removable from the pure culture. Serial dilution from 10−1, 10−2, 10−3, and 10−4 was then carried out. A syringe was used to transfer 0.5 mL of the aliquots into each of the plates. A sterile rod was used to gently stir the spores for even distribution in the plates. The same cup boring process as done for the bacteria was followed. Two controls, clotrimazole and sterile distilled water, were used. Clotrimazole was also made into concentrations of 100% and 50% using half and full tablets. All the plates containing the extracts and fungi were incubated at 25°C after which the zones of inhibition were measured after 48 hours of incubation [8].


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Qualitative Phytochemical Analysis

From the qualitative phytochemical study of root and shoot ofP. smithianus, reducing sugars and tannins were present while alkaloids and steroids were absent in both extracts and plant parts. The root and shoot aqueous extracts also showed the presence of flavonoids and terpenoids which were also present in the ethanolic extracts but were found only in the shoot. Cardiac glycosides and saponin were recorded for the ethanolic extracts of the root and shoot (Table 1).Table 1
Qualitative analysis of extracts ofPycreus smithianus.
Test
Inference
Root (aq)
Shoot (aq)
Root (eth)
Shoot (eth)
Reducing sugars
+
+
+
+
Dragendorff’s reagent (alkaloids)
−
−
−
−
Steroids
−
−
−
−
Tannins
+
+
+
+
Flavonoids
+
+
−
+
Terpenoids
+
+
−
+
Cardiac glycosides
−
+
+
+
Saponins
+
−
+
+
Key: eth: ethanolic extract; aq: aqueous extract; (−): absent; (+): present.


### 3.2. Quantitative Phytochemical Analysis

The proportion of tannins was higher in the shoot than the root as indicated for both solvents. Aqueous extract of the root recorded the highest percentage for saponins while the aqueous extracts of both parts had relatively higher percentages of flavonoids and phenols than the ethanolic. Ethanolic shoot and root extracts contained high values of reducing sugars compared to the other phytochemicals (Table2).Table 2
Quantitative analysis of extracts ofPycreus smithianus.
Extracts
Phytochemicals/(%/100 g)
Tannin
Reducing sugar
Flavonoids
Phenol
Saponin
Root (aq)
0.01591
2.32065
0.16009
0.0356
0.79228
Shoot (aq)
0.04855
0.85326
0.12432
0.01445
*
*
Root (eth)
0.0184
4.09239
*
*
0.0133
0.74816
Shoot (eth)
0.02887
4.14674
0.10286
0.00834
0.69363
Key: eth: ethanolic extract; aq: aqueous extract;*
*: not present.


### 3.3. Antibacterial Activity Test

The antibacterial activity tests on the extracts of root and shoot ofP. smithianus revealed that the 100% and 50% concentrations of the shoot and root ethanolic extracts were active againstS. typhi while the aqueous extracts showed no activity (Table 3). Values of the shoot extract were higher than that of the root. This inhibitory activity of the ethanolic extracts increased at higher concentration. However, againstS. aureus, the shoot aqueous and root ethanolic extracts showed inhibitory activities at both concentrations while other extracts showed no activity.Table 3
Measurement of antibacterial inhibition zones.
Bacteria
Extracts
Zone of inhibition (mm)
100%
50%
Salmonella typhi
Root (aq)
na
na
Shoot (aq)
na
na
Root (eth)
15.25a ± 0.51b
11.75a ± 0.25b
Shoot (eth)
21.25a ± 0.51b
20.38a ± 0.38b
Ciprofloxacin
28.88a ± 0.13b
26.88a ± 0.13b
Water
na
na
Staphylococcus aureus
Root (aq)
na
na
Shoot (aq)
17.13a ± 0.13b
14.38a ± 0.13b
Root (eth)
30.25a ± 0.76b
26.88 ± 0.13b
Shoot (eth)
na
na
Ciprofloxacin
32.88a ± 0.13b
28.63a ± 0.38b
Water
na
na
Key:amean of triplicates (including diameter of borer), bstandard error, aq: aqueous extract, na: no inhibition, and eth: ethanolic extract.


### 3.4. Antifungal Activity Test

The antifungal activity tests, carried out on aqueous and ethanolic extracts of root and shoot of studied sedge, showed that no extract was active againstA. nigerat all concentrations. However, the root ethanolic extract showed strong activity compared to the control againstC. albicansat both concentrations (Table 4). The inhibitory activity of the root ethanolic extract increased at higher concentration.Table 4
Measurement of antifungal inhibition zones.
Fungi
Extracts
Zone of inhibition (mm)
100%
50%
Aspergillus niger
Root (aq)
na
na
Shoot (aq)
na
na
Root (eth)
na
na
Shoot (eth)
na
na
Clotrimazole
28.88a ± 0.13b
26.88a ± 0.13b
Water
na
na
Candida albicans
Root (aq)
na
na
Shoot (aq)
na
na
Root (eth)
13.62a ± 0.38b
11.25a ± 0.25b
Shoot (eth)
na
na
Clotrimazole
17.50a ± 0.25b
15.88a ± 0.13b
Water
na
na
Key:amean of triplicates (including diameter of borer), bstandard error, aq: aqueous extract, na: no inhibition, and eth: ethanolic extract.


## 3.1. Qualitative Phytochemical Analysis

From the qualitative phytochemical study of root and shoot ofP. smithianus, reducing sugars and tannins were present while alkaloids and steroids were absent in both extracts and plant parts. The root and shoot aqueous extracts also showed the presence of flavonoids and terpenoids which were also present in the ethanolic extracts but were found only in the shoot. Cardiac glycosides and saponin were recorded for the ethanolic extracts of the root and shoot (Table 1).Table 1
Qualitative analysis of extracts ofPycreus smithianus.
Test
Inference
Root (aq)
Shoot (aq)
Root (eth)
Shoot (eth)
Reducing sugars
+
+
+
+
Dragendorff’s reagent (alkaloids)
−
−
−
−
Steroids
−
−
−
−
Tannins
+
+
+
+
Flavonoids
+
+
−
+
Terpenoids
+
+
−
+
Cardiac glycosides
−
+
+
+
Saponins
+
−
+
+
Key: eth: ethanolic extract; aq: aqueous extract; (−): absent; (+): present.


## 3.2. Quantitative Phytochemical Analysis

The proportion of tannins was higher in the shoot than the root as indicated for both solvents. Aqueous extract of the root recorded the highest percentage for saponins while the aqueous extracts of both parts had relatively higher percentages of flavonoids and phenols than the ethanolic. Ethanolic shoot and root extracts contained high values of reducing sugars compared to the other phytochemicals (Table2).Table 2
Quantitative analysis of extracts ofPycreus smithianus.
Extracts
Phytochemicals/(%/100 g)
Tannin
Reducing sugar
Flavonoids
Phenol
Saponin
Root (aq)
0.01591
2.32065
0.16009
0.0356
0.79228
Shoot (aq)
0.04855
0.85326
0.12432
0.01445
*
*
Root (eth)
0.0184
4.09239
*
*
0.0133
0.74816
Shoot (eth)
0.02887
4.14674
0.10286
0.00834
0.69363
Key: eth: ethanolic extract; aq: aqueous extract;*
*: not present.


## 3.3. Antibacterial Activity Test

The antibacterial activity tests on the extracts of root and shoot ofP. smithianus revealed that the 100% and 50% concentrations of the shoot and root ethanolic extracts were active againstS. typhi while the aqueous extracts showed no activity (Table 3). Values of the shoot extract were higher than that of the root. This inhibitory activity of the ethanolic extracts increased at higher concentration. However, againstS. aureus, the shoot aqueous and root ethanolic extracts showed inhibitory activities at both concentrations while other extracts showed no activity.Table 3
Measurement of antibacterial inhibition zones.
Bacteria
Extracts
Zone of inhibition (mm)
100%
50%
Salmonella typhi
Root (aq)
na
na
Shoot (aq)
na
na
Root (eth)
15.25a ± 0.51b
11.75a ± 0.25b
Shoot (eth)
21.25a ± 0.51b
20.38a ± 0.38b
Ciprofloxacin
28.88a ± 0.13b
26.88a ± 0.13b
Water
na
na
Staphylococcus aureus
Root (aq)
na
na
Shoot (aq)
17.13a ± 0.13b
14.38a ± 0.13b
Root (eth)
30.25a ± 0.76b
26.88 ± 0.13b
Shoot (eth)
na
na
Ciprofloxacin
32.88a ± 0.13b
28.63a ± 0.38b
Water
na
na
Key:amean of triplicates (including diameter of borer), bstandard error, aq: aqueous extract, na: no inhibition, and eth: ethanolic extract.


## 3.4. Antifungal Activity Test

The antifungal activity tests, carried out on aqueous and ethanolic extracts of root and shoot of studied sedge, showed that no extract was active againstA. nigerat all concentrations. However, the root ethanolic extract showed strong activity compared to the control againstC. albicansat both concentrations (Table 4). The inhibitory activity of the root ethanolic extract increased at higher concentration.Table 4
Measurement of antifungal inhibition zones.
Fungi
Extracts
Zone of inhibition (mm)
100%
50%
Aspergillus niger
Root (aq)
na
na
Shoot (aq)
na
na
Root (eth)
na
na
Shoot (eth)
na
na
Clotrimazole
28.88a ± 0.13b
26.88a ± 0.13b
Water
na
na
Candida albicans
Root (aq)
na
na
Shoot (aq)
na
na
Root (eth)
13.62a ± 0.38b
11.25a ± 0.25b
Shoot (eth)
na
na
Clotrimazole
17.50a ± 0.25b
15.88a ± 0.13b
Water
na
na
Key:amean of triplicates (including diameter of borer), bstandard error, aq: aqueous extract, na: no inhibition, and eth: ethanolic extract.


## 4. Discussion

Six types of phytochemicals were revealed present in the shoot ethanolic extract. They are reducing sugars, terpenoids, tannins, flavonoids, saponins, and cardiac glycosides. The shoot ethanolic extract was followed by the root and shoot aqueous extracts with five phytochemicals each. Phytochemicals of the root ethanolic extract were the least in number, four, but they were, nonetheless, the most active (Table1). The phytochemical screening showed that higher proportions of reducing sugars are present in the ethanolic extracts with only the root aqueous indicating appreciable presence while sugars are in low proportion in the shoot aqueous (Table 2). Kodera et al. [9] and Dhalel and Markandeya [10] have remarked that the combination of the reducing sugars constitutes a building block in the production of phytoalexins which are antimicrobial substances synthesized by plants. Phytoalexins accumulate rapidly at areas of incompatible pathogen infection. The abundance of reducing sugars in the root ethanolic extract could account for its high antibacterial activity (Table 3). This agrees with previous works of Dhalel and Markandeya [10] and Mills-Robertson et al. [11] on the antibacterial property of reducing sugars. Phenols and tannins are other significant phytochemicals present in all the four extracts. Phenols have been reported to have antiseptic, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and antitumor properties [12]. Tannins have also been reported by Okigbo et al. [12] to have soothing, skin regeneration, and anti-inflammatory as well as diuretic properties. Flavonoids and saponins, though present in appreciable proportions, are absent in root ethanolic and shoot aqueous, respectively (Table 2). Flavonoids have been reported to have antimicrobial activities [13]. However, the abundance of flavonoids in the root aqueous extract could not give the extract the expected antimicrobial activity while the root ethanolic extract that lacked flavonoids has very good antimicrobial activity (Tables 3 and 4). Cushnie and Lamb [13] remarked that reported antimicrobial activity of flavonoids is controversial, perhaps due to “the inter- and intraassay variation in susceptibility testing.” From the present work, it was revealed that steroids and alkaloids are both absent inP. smithianus(Table 1). Okigbo et al. [12] described alkaloids as being useful in medicine for their analgesic, antispasmodic, and bactericidal effects. However, the presence of reducing sugars, phenols, and tannins in all the extracts provides alternative sources of antimicrobial compounds in the plant. The presence and proportions of these other phytochemicals are significant enough to makeP. smithianus a good source of these antimicrobial compounds.From the assays, the shoot ethanolic extract seemed to lack bioactive forms against all other pathogens exceptS. typhi with the significant value of 100%: 21.25
a
±
0.5
1, 50%: 20.3
8
a
±
0.3
8 as against the standard antibiotic control, ciprofloxacin 100%: 28.8
8
a
±
0.1
3, 50%: 26.8
8
a
±
0.1
3 (Tables 3 and 4). The root aqueous extract had the highest concentration of phenols and flavonoids among the tested four extracts. In spite of these high concentrations, this extract was inactive against all the tested microbes. The significance of the extraction solvent is underscored here since the root ethanolic extract on the other hand with no flavonoids showed good activity against three of the pathogens,C. albicans,S. typhi, andS. aureus (Tables 3 and 4). Therefore the extraction solvent determines to a great extent the activity of bioactive compounds in plant materials [14]. Root ethanolic extract had the least of four phytochemical types and, surprisingly, it has the only significant activity onC. albicans(Tables 1 and 4). Of significant note also are the root ethanolic and shoot aqueous extracts ofP. smithianusagainstS. aureus (100%: 17.13 ± 0.13; 50%: 14.38 ± 0.13 and 100%: 30.25 ± 0.76; 50%: 26.88 ± 0.13, resp.). The root ethanolic extract inhibitory activity compares favourably with the control, ciprofloxacin (150 μg/mL: 32.88 ± 0.13; 75 μg/mL: 28.63 ± 0.38) (Table 3). This high inhibition by the root ethanolic extract against the tested bacteria indicates that the plant part can be used in medicine upon purification and isolation of its active compounds. The inactivity recorded for the root aqueous and shoot ethanolic extracts also demonstrates the importance of using the appropriate part of a plant in phytomedical work. This information is important in guiding users of this plant in herbal medicine and pharmacognosy to recognize the part to target for maximum and effective recovery of bioactive compounds.The shoot ethanolic extract showed the greatest inhibition againstS. typhi (50%; 20.3
8
±
0.3
8, 100%; 21.25
±
0.5
1) and significantly compares with the control ciprofloxacin (50%; 26.8
8
±
0.1
3, 100%; 28.8
8
±
0.1
3). Isolation and purification of the bioactive compounds responsible for this inhibitory activity may lead to the production of antibiotics which can be used effectively againstS. typhi. A mild inhibitory action againstS. typhi (100%: 19.13
±
0.38) and (50%: 17.25
±
0.25) was also shown by the root ethanolic extract. This further shows the antimicrobial potency of the ethanolic extract of this plant. The inactivity of the aqueous extracts againstS. typhi demonstrates the inability of the extraction solvent to extract the active phytochemicals compared to the ethanolic extract (Table 3). There was no record of inhibition againstA. niger by any of the extracts from the studied plant parts (Table 4). The observed inactivity ofA. niger may be due to the mycotoxin called ochratoxin produced by some fungi among which areAspergillus. Samson et al. [15] reported that this mycotoxin was produced by these fungi for resistance against antifungal drugs. AlthoughCandida albicans is known to be resistant to most antimicrobial agents which was also shown in this work, the root ethanolic extract however showed some level of inhibition (100%: 13.62
±
0.25 and 50%: 11.25
±
0.25) against the “stubborn” fungus (Table 4).The ethanolic extracts showed higher antimicrobial activities than the aqueous extracts. This implies that ethanol extracted more active phytoconstituents compared to water and this agrees with the works of Eloff [16], Nwachukwu and Uzoeto, [17], Peni et al. [18], and Adeniyi et al. [19].


## 5. Conclusion

The study revealed that the root and shoot ofP. smithianus have significant antimicrobial activity. The study further confirms that the ethanolic extracts of plants are more active than the aqueous extracts. The root ethanolic extract was the most active and could be an important source of natural antimicrobials particularly against “stubborn”C. albicans and thus recommended for isolation of the therapeutic antimicrobials and further pharmacological evaluation. Also, the root of the plant is richer in bioactive compounds than the shoot with respect to the antimicrobial activities. Extracts fromP. smithianus show higher antibacterial than antifungal activity.



---

*Source: 761613-2014-12-31.xml*