# Anionic Dye Removal by Polypyrrole-Modified Red Mud and Its Application to a Lab-Scale Column: Adsorption Performance and Phytotoxicity Assessment

Authors: Feng Zhang; Yue Yin; Chunlei Qiao; Ya-nan Luan; Mengyan Guo; Yihua Xiao; Changqing Liu
Journal: Adsorption Science & Technology
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

In this study, polypyrrole-modified red mud (PRM) was prepared for the efficient removal of anionic dyes (methyl orange and Congo red) from aqueous solutions. The phytotoxicity (bean sprouts) of the dye solution before and after dye removal was investigated. Adsorption kinetics confirmed that the adsorption of methyl orange (MO) and Congo red (CR) on PRM was controlled by chemical reactions between the functional groups of polypyrrole and dyes. From Langmuir isotherm fitting, we found the theoretical adsorption capacities of MO and CR on PRM were 194.1 and 314.9 mg/g, respectively. The adsorption progress of MO and CR on PRM was found to be spontaneous and endothermic. The column studies demonstrated that, under dynamic flow, the PRM can efficiently remove MO and CR from aqueous solution, with adsorption capacities of 31.08 and 55.04 mg/g, respectively. In the toxicity test, the phytotoxicity of the column effluents (after dye removal) was significantly lowered compared to the initial dye influents. After the removal of MO and CR, the average root length of bean sprouts was increased from 3.30 cm to 5.18 cm and from 3.01 cm to 7.00 cm, respectively. These findings highlighted the efficient removal of dyes by PRM from aqueous solution, demonstrating the possible application of PRM for the removal of dye from dye-contaminated wastewaters.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Different types of contaminations in water bodies pose great threat to the environment and society [1, 2]. Among these contaminations, organic dyes are highly noteworthy because over 40,000 types of organic dyes are fabricated and widely used in a lot of industrial including textile, paper, and leather [3]. Due to inappropriate treatment process, large amount of dyes together with industrial wastewater are discharged into natural water bodies [4, 5]. The presence of dyes in the aqueous solutions poses a huge threat to the environmental livings because they have been confirmed to be carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, and neurotoxicity [6, 7]. Among these dyes, there are more than 7,000 different synthetic chemical molecules involved which are nonbiodegradable under environmental conditions [7, 8]. Hence, the sufficient removal of organic dyes before discharging into water bodies is of great significance to environmental safety.Recently, different technologies have been investigated for the treatment of dye-contaminated wastewater including, coagulation, chemical oxidation, photocatalysis, and adsorption [9–12]. Among these technologies, adsorption progress has been confirmed to be a reliable and effective solution for dye removal from aqueous solutions [13, 14]. The removal of Congo red (CR) by using N,N-dimethyl dehydroabietylamine oxide-modified zeolites was investigated by Liu et al., and they found that the adsorption capacity of CR on modified zeolites was 69.9 mg/g [6]. Zhang et al. studied the dye adsorption capacity by g-C3N4/graphene oxide-wrapped sponge monoliths [15]. Most of these studies showed promising dye adsorption performance; however, few have calculated the potential cost of the fabricated adsorbents. With expensive raw materials used (such as precious metals), the cost of these adsorbents is not acceptable under real conditions. Hence, it is crucial for researchers to find affordable alternatives for the removal of dye from dye-contaminated wastewaters.Red mud (RM), which is a by-product of aluminum industry, has been recognized as a hazardous waste due to its difficulty of disposal and large volumes [16]. The inappropriate placements of RM have caused several severe accidents in China and around the world. However, recent researches proposed that the red mud could be used as raw material of adsorbent due to its high content of iron and aluminum; this could transfer the “wastes” into “resources” and reduce the cost of raw materials. Successful fabrications of red mud-based adsorbents have been developed for the removal of fluoride [17], arsenic [18], antibiotics [19, 20], phosphate [21], and dyes [22].In this manuscript, we report a detailed application of polypyrrole-modified red mud (PRM) as adsorbent for the removal of anionic dyes: methyl orange (MO) and CR. The morphology features of PRM were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The effects of initial pH, dye concentration, adsorbent dosage, adsorption time, and adsorption temperature were investigated through batch studies. A continuous-flow column study was designed and operated to investigate the adsorption performance of both dyes onto PRM under dynamic condition. Furthermore, the phytotoxicity of the column effluents was assessed. The objectives of this study are to (i) investigate the adsorption performance of MO and CR onto PRM in batch and column studies, (ii) elucidate the proper mechanisms by model fittings and adsorbent characteristics, and (iii) characterize the dye detoxication ability of PRM. The research provided a useful reference for future researches in dye adsorbent fabrications and application evaluations.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

Methyl orange and Congo red are purchased from Ourchem Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). The characteristics and structure of these two dyes are listed in Table1. Other used chemicals are purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd, China, including ferric sulfate, HCl, NaOH, pyrrole, and methyl alcohol. All the used chemicals are of analytical grade and without further purification. Deionized water is used in all experiments. Red mud is collected from an alumina industry in Shandong province. Orion StarTM A211 (Thermo Fisher) is used in this study for pH adjustment.Table 1
Characteristics and structures of methyl orange and Congo red.
Generic nameAbbreviationλmax (nm)Molecular weight (g/mol)Molecular formulaMethyl orangeMO497327.33Congo redCR464696.68


### 2.2. Preparation of PRM Adsorbents

The PRM adsorbents are prepared using optimized procedures based on early studies [23, 24]. First, pyrrole solution is prepared using 0.6 mL pyrrole diluted into 100 mL with deionized water. Then, 2.5 red mud is added into 30 mL pyrrole solution and mixed in a rotator mixer for 1 h. After 1 hour of complete mixing, 1.25 g ferric sulfate is added into the solution. Finally, the red mud is rinsed with methyl alcohol and deionized water for several times until the supernatant reaches neutral and dried in an oven; the obtained PRM is collected in a desiccator for future use.


### 2.3. Adsorption Experiments

Batch and column studies are conducted to investigate the adsorption performance of both dyes onto PRM under static and dynamic conditions. 1000 mg/L of MO and CR stock solutions are prepared and stored in the refrigerator. The dye solutions of 10-100 mg/L are prepared by dilution of stock solutions. The pH of the dyes is adjusted by adding 0.1 M HCl or 0.1 M NaOH.For static experiments, certain amount of PRM is added to 100 mL conical flasks with 50 mL of dye solutions. The flasks are sealed with parafilm and placed in a thermostatic orbital shaker with a shaking speed of 120 rpm (temperature is maintained constant). The concentrations of dyes are determined by a UV-Vis spectroscopy at 497 nm for MO and 464 nm for CR (DR2800, HACHI). All experiments are conducted in duplicates, and the data are average. The adsorption capacityqe of PRM and removal rate R are calculated as follows:
(1)qe=C0−Cea,(2)R=C0−CeC0×100%,where C0 and Ce are the dye concentration at initial stage and equilibrium stage (mg/L) and a (g/L) is the dosage of PRM.For dynamic experiments, a laboratory-scale column (bedvolume~5.5 mL) is used (Fig. S1). The concentration of feed solutions is maintained at 50 mg/L for both dyes, and the effluents are collected and determined. The phytotoxicity assessment of the effluents is conducted using the methods proposed by Patra et al. [25]. Specifically, bean sprout beads are selected as the indicator of phytotoxicity assessment. The dried beads are initially washed with 1% sodium hypochlorite and deionized water and then air-dried under room temperature. After that, the beads are planted on cotton soaked with solution (deionized water and dye solution with or without adsorption treatment) and allowed to germinate under dark conditions for 4 days. All experiments were conducted by triplicates, and the relative standard deviations were below 8%.


### 2.4. Adsorption Models

To better interpret the adsorption mechanism during the adsorption progress, several adsorption models are fitted in this research. Pseudo-first-order (Equation (3)), pseudo-second-order (Equation (4)), and intraparticle diffusion (Equation (5)) are three classical kinetic models to reveal the adsorption progress, and h is the related initial adsorption rate. The equations are listed as follows:
(3)lnqe−qt=lnqe−K1t,(4)tqt=1K2qe2+tqe,(5)qt=Kdt1/2+C,(6)h=qe2K2,where qe and qt are the adsorption capacity of the PRM at equilibrium and at different times (mg/g). t (min) is the adsorption time. K1 (min-1), K2 (g/mg/min), and Kd (mg/g/min1/2) are the kinetic rate constants.Adsorption isotherms for both dyes onto PRM are fitted using Langmuir model (Equation (7)), Freundlich model (Equation (8)), and Temkin mode (Equation (9)). The equations are listed as follows:
(7)qe=qmKLCe1+KLCe,(8)qe=KFCe1/n,(9)qe=KTlnfCe,where qm (mg/g) is the theoretical maximum adsorption capacity of PRM; KL (L/mg), KF (mg/g), and KT (J/mol) are the constants of Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin isotherms. n represents the adsorption intensity, and f (L/mg) is the Temkin binding energy.For further evaluation of the adsorption progress, dimensionless factorRL derived from Langmuir isotherm is calculated. This constant represents whether the progress is favorable or unfavorable. If 0<RL<1, the adsorption progress is favorable; otherwise, it will be unfavorable.
(10)RL=11+KLC0.Temperature is a vital parameter in adsorption progress; the effects of different operating temperatures (288.15 K, 298.15 K, and 308.15 K) are investigated in this research. The adsorption thermodynamic is revealed by the widely used Van’t Hoff equation as follows [26]:
(11)ΔG0=−RTlnqeCe,(12)ΔG0=ΔH0−TΔS0,whereΔG0 is the free energy change (kJ/mol), R is the ideal gas constant (kJ/mol/K), and T is the solution temperature (K). ΔH0 (kJ/mol) and ΔS0 (kJ/mol/K) are referred to standard enthalpy and standard entropy.In order to predict and evaluate the adsorption performance in column studies, the Thomas model is used in this research. The Thomas model assumes that the adsorption progress by mass transfer processes at the interphase species which can be expressed as follows [27, 28]:
(13)Ct=C01+expkthqthm/Q−kthC0t,where kth (mL/mg/min) and qth (mg/g) are the rate constant and theoretical maximum adsorption capacity of the Thomas model, m (g) is the adsorbent dosage, and Q (mL/min) is the flow velocity of influents.


### 2.5. Adsorbent Characterization

The surface morphology was determined by SEM (SU8010, Hitachi, Japan). The EDS was detected by ZEISS SEM (Gemini 300, Germany). FT-IR spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher, USA) was used to analyze the functional groups of the adsorbents.


## 2.1. Materials

Methyl orange and Congo red are purchased from Ourchem Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). The characteristics and structure of these two dyes are listed in Table1. Other used chemicals are purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd, China, including ferric sulfate, HCl, NaOH, pyrrole, and methyl alcohol. All the used chemicals are of analytical grade and without further purification. Deionized water is used in all experiments. Red mud is collected from an alumina industry in Shandong province. Orion StarTM A211 (Thermo Fisher) is used in this study for pH adjustment.Table 1
Characteristics and structures of methyl orange and Congo red.
Generic nameAbbreviationλmax (nm)Molecular weight (g/mol)Molecular formulaMethyl orangeMO497327.33Congo redCR464696.68


## 2.2. Preparation of PRM Adsorbents

The PRM adsorbents are prepared using optimized procedures based on early studies [23, 24]. First, pyrrole solution is prepared using 0.6 mL pyrrole diluted into 100 mL with deionized water. Then, 2.5 red mud is added into 30 mL pyrrole solution and mixed in a rotator mixer for 1 h. After 1 hour of complete mixing, 1.25 g ferric sulfate is added into the solution. Finally, the red mud is rinsed with methyl alcohol and deionized water for several times until the supernatant reaches neutral and dried in an oven; the obtained PRM is collected in a desiccator for future use.


## 2.3. Adsorption Experiments

Batch and column studies are conducted to investigate the adsorption performance of both dyes onto PRM under static and dynamic conditions. 1000 mg/L of MO and CR stock solutions are prepared and stored in the refrigerator. The dye solutions of 10-100 mg/L are prepared by dilution of stock solutions. The pH of the dyes is adjusted by adding 0.1 M HCl or 0.1 M NaOH.For static experiments, certain amount of PRM is added to 100 mL conical flasks with 50 mL of dye solutions. The flasks are sealed with parafilm and placed in a thermostatic orbital shaker with a shaking speed of 120 rpm (temperature is maintained constant). The concentrations of dyes are determined by a UV-Vis spectroscopy at 497 nm for MO and 464 nm for CR (DR2800, HACHI). All experiments are conducted in duplicates, and the data are average. The adsorption capacityqe of PRM and removal rate R are calculated as follows:
(1)qe=C0−Cea,(2)R=C0−CeC0×100%,where C0 and Ce are the dye concentration at initial stage and equilibrium stage (mg/L) and a (g/L) is the dosage of PRM.For dynamic experiments, a laboratory-scale column (bedvolume~5.5 mL) is used (Fig. S1). The concentration of feed solutions is maintained at 50 mg/L for both dyes, and the effluents are collected and determined. The phytotoxicity assessment of the effluents is conducted using the methods proposed by Patra et al. [25]. Specifically, bean sprout beads are selected as the indicator of phytotoxicity assessment. The dried beads are initially washed with 1% sodium hypochlorite and deionized water and then air-dried under room temperature. After that, the beads are planted on cotton soaked with solution (deionized water and dye solution with or without adsorption treatment) and allowed to germinate under dark conditions for 4 days. All experiments were conducted by triplicates, and the relative standard deviations were below 8%.


## 2.4. Adsorption Models

To better interpret the adsorption mechanism during the adsorption progress, several adsorption models are fitted in this research. Pseudo-first-order (Equation (3)), pseudo-second-order (Equation (4)), and intraparticle diffusion (Equation (5)) are three classical kinetic models to reveal the adsorption progress, and h is the related initial adsorption rate. The equations are listed as follows:
(3)lnqe−qt=lnqe−K1t,(4)tqt=1K2qe2+tqe,(5)qt=Kdt1/2+C,(6)h=qe2K2,where qe and qt are the adsorption capacity of the PRM at equilibrium and at different times (mg/g). t (min) is the adsorption time. K1 (min-1), K2 (g/mg/min), and Kd (mg/g/min1/2) are the kinetic rate constants.Adsorption isotherms for both dyes onto PRM are fitted using Langmuir model (Equation (7)), Freundlich model (Equation (8)), and Temkin mode (Equation (9)). The equations are listed as follows:
(7)qe=qmKLCe1+KLCe,(8)qe=KFCe1/n,(9)qe=KTlnfCe,where qm (mg/g) is the theoretical maximum adsorption capacity of PRM; KL (L/mg), KF (mg/g), and KT (J/mol) are the constants of Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin isotherms. n represents the adsorption intensity, and f (L/mg) is the Temkin binding energy.For further evaluation of the adsorption progress, dimensionless factorRL derived from Langmuir isotherm is calculated. This constant represents whether the progress is favorable or unfavorable. If 0<RL<1, the adsorption progress is favorable; otherwise, it will be unfavorable.
(10)RL=11+KLC0.Temperature is a vital parameter in adsorption progress; the effects of different operating temperatures (288.15 K, 298.15 K, and 308.15 K) are investigated in this research. The adsorption thermodynamic is revealed by the widely used Van’t Hoff equation as follows [26]:
(11)ΔG0=−RTlnqeCe,(12)ΔG0=ΔH0−TΔS0,whereΔG0 is the free energy change (kJ/mol), R is the ideal gas constant (kJ/mol/K), and T is the solution temperature (K). ΔH0 (kJ/mol) and ΔS0 (kJ/mol/K) are referred to standard enthalpy and standard entropy.In order to predict and evaluate the adsorption performance in column studies, the Thomas model is used in this research. The Thomas model assumes that the adsorption progress by mass transfer processes at the interphase species which can be expressed as follows [27, 28]:
(13)Ct=C01+expkthqthm/Q−kthC0t,where kth (mL/mg/min) and qth (mg/g) are the rate constant and theoretical maximum adsorption capacity of the Thomas model, m (g) is the adsorbent dosage, and Q (mL/min) is the flow velocity of influents.


## 2.5. Adsorbent Characterization

The surface morphology was determined by SEM (SU8010, Hitachi, Japan). The EDS was detected by ZEISS SEM (Gemini 300, Germany). FT-IR spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher, USA) was used to analyze the functional groups of the adsorbents.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Characterization of PRM

SEM images and FT-IR spectrum of raw red mud and PRM are given in Fig. S2&3. The polypyrrole modification improved the roughness of the adsorbent surface, with increased granular-like morphology occurred on the surface of PRM. In FT-IR spectrum, the pyrrole monomer ring at antisymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations was observed around 1540 and 1460 cm-1 [29]. Moreover, the band at 880 and 680 cm-1 was related to C-H and N-H bending vibrations. These results confirm the successful modification of polypyrrole onto the red mud. The SEM images and EDS of PRM after adsorption of MO and CR are shown in Fig. S4 and Fig. S5. The increase of S element in EDS confirmed the successful adsorption of MO and CR. After adsorption, the surface of PRM turned to a uniform and smooth surface without evident pores. Thus, in compliance with EDS results, it can be confirmed that both dyes are adsorbed onto the surface PRM.


### 3.2. Effect of Initial pH and Dosage

Before investigating the adsorption performance of MO and CR onto PRM, the effect of initial solution pH and adsorbent dosage should be thoroughly assessed due to their significant influence on adsorption progress [30]. The effect of initial solution pH on MO and CR adsorption is studied in the pH range from 3 to 11. In order to better understand the effect of initial solution pH on adsorbent itself, the point of zero charge (pHpzc) of the PRM is also investigated. As shown in Figure 1(a), the adsorption capacities of MO and CR share the same trend, and both achieve highest adsorption capacity at pH=4 and decrease with the increase of pH. These results are in accordance with previous researcher that highest adsorption capacity was achieved at pH of 2 [25]. At beginning, the adsorption seems to be deteriorated (pH=3); this is due to the decomposition of the PRM under extremely acid conditions [31]. The effect of initial pH on the solution iron concentration is displayed in Figure 2. Under pH=3, the Fe concentration exceeds 3 mg/L while it remained below 1 mg/L under other pH condition. This suggests that the extremely acid condition may lead to a potential decomposition of PRM; hence, future experiments are conducted above pH of 4. The pHpzc of PRM is around 6.5, which means that the surface of PRM is negatively charged at solution pH>6.5 and has a positively charged surface when pH is lower than 6.5. As previously mentioned, both dyes are typical anionic species which means that the positively charged surface is beneficial to the adsorption progress due to the electrostatic attraction between positively charged surface and negatively charged dyes [32]. The molecular formula of MO and CR is given in Table 1; both contain sulphonic acid groups (R-SO3Na) and turn into sulphonate groups (R-SO3-) at lower pH conditions. This is in accordance with the results in Figure 1(a) while lower pH results in higher adsorption capacity of both dyes. Therefore, the following experiments are conducted at an initial solution pH of 4 to achieve the highest adsorption capacity and prevent decomposition of PRM.Figure 1
(a) Effect of initial pH on MO and CR adsorption; (b)pHpzc of the adsorbent (experiment conditions: initialconcentration=100 mg/L and dosage=0.5 g/L).
(a)(b)Figure 2
Effect of initial pH on dissolved Fe concentration (experiment condition:dosage=1 g/L).The proper adsorbent dosage is considered to be an important influencing factor in the adsorption progress, since it could change the equilibrium system between adsorbent and adsorbate [33]. The influence of adsorbent dosage is carried out with dosage ranging from 0.25 to 5 g/L, at initial solution pH of 4 and initial dye concentration of 100 mg/L for both MO and CR. As illustrated in Figure 3(a), the removal rates of MO and CR increase with dosage ranging from 0.25 to 3 g/L and reach equilibrium above 3 g/L. With the dosage amount increase from 0.25 g/L, the vacant active sites increased significantly which leads to a higher dye removal rate. Under dosage of 3 g/L, CR is removed 100% in the solutions and further increase in adsorbent dosage is unnecessary. However, after dosage of 3 g/L, the removal rate of MO reaches equilibrium of around 70% with no significant signs of continuously increase. This could be due to the interaction behavior between adsorbents when the dosage increases to a certain level, the active sites might be interfered. The adsorption capacity under different absorbent dosage is given in Figure 3(b). It is obvious that higher dosage leads to lower adsorption capacity; hence, in consideration of the removal rate and adsorption capacity, the dosage of 1 g/L is chosen in following experiments.Figure 3
(a) Effect of adsorbent dosage on MO and CR removal; (b) dye adsorption capacity at different adsorbent dosages (experiment conditions:initialconcentration=100 mg/L, pH=4).
(a)(b)


### 3.3. Adsorption Kinetics

The adsorption kinetics are of great significance to evaluating the adsorption efficiency and progress of MO and CR onto PRM during the adsorption [34]. Time-dependent adsorption experiments were carried out with different initial dye concentrations (20, 50, and 100 mg/L). As shown in Figures 4(a) and 4(d), the remaining concentrations of MO and CR are recorded at different time intervals in 36 h. Obviously, the adsorption reactions show rapid adsorption rates at initial stage and stabilized afterwards [35]. At initial concentration of 20, 50, and 100 mg/L, the equilibrium MO concentration decreased to 11.0, 23.0, and 41.5 mg/L. However, the adsorption of CR is more effective, with equilibrium concentrations plunge to 0.0, 5.5, and 14.0 mg/L. The possible mechanism is that MO and CR have different molecular weights (MW), with the MW of CR reaches 696.7 g/mol which is twice that of MO. Hence, the adsorption capacities for MO and CR are comparable in terms of adsorbed molecules (mM/g).Figure 4
Effect of time on (a, d) MO and CR adsorption, (b, f) pseudo-first-order, (c, g) pseudo-second-order, and (d, h) intraparticle diffusion model fitting of MO and CR (experiment conditions:adsorbentdosage=1 g/L, pH=4).
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)The fitting parameters of pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, and intraparticle diffusion model are summarized in Tables2 and 3. For pseudo-first-order model, the calculated qe value is significantly different from the experimental value, and the correlation coefficients (R2) are not satisfying in both MO and CR data. By contrast, the calculated qe value in pseudo-second-order model is nearly close to the experimental value and each R2 value is above 0.99 for different initial concentration of MO and CR (Figures 4(b) and 4(e)). Hence, it can be concluded that the dye adsorption progress is controlled by chemical reactions, and the rate k2 and h could be used to describe the removal rates of MO and CR [36]. The removal kinetics of MO are clearly slower than CR, and the k2 value in pseudo-second-order of CR adsorption is higher than MO in every initial dye concentration. More importantly, the initial adsorption rate h of CR adsorption is significantly higher (i.e., with at least three times higher). After 1 hour adsorption of 100 mg/L dyes by PRM, the CR concentration is lowered to 28.7 mg/L while the MO concentration remains at 72.0 mg/L. This confirms the rapid removal capacity of CR by PRM adsorbent.Table 2
Kinetic parameters of pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order.
C0 (mg/L)qe (mg/g)Pseudo-first-order constantPseudo-second-order constantqe (mg/g)k1 (min-1)R2qe (mg/g)k2 (g/mg/min)h (mg/g/min)R2MO209.102.390.09030.869.070.191615.760.995027.106.890.15180.7327.780.047136.350.9910058.5026.950.16210.9760.610.015055.100.99CR2020.002.710.16320.9320.120.228792.580.995044.608.570.16360.9645.050.0694140.850.9910086.0015.850.16380.9086.210.0434322.560.99Table 3
Kinetics parameters of intraparticle diffusion model.
C0 (mg/L)Intra-particle diffusionKd1 (mg/g/min1/2)R2Kd2 (mg/g/min1/2)R2Kd3 (mg/g/min1/2)R2MO203.100.990.420.920.271.005014.290.982.580.990.541.0010020.100.997.650.950.451.00CR204.510.970.620.980.051.005012.890.862.040.990.141.0010024.060.972.000.981.161.00The fitting of intraparticle diffusion model is shown in Table3. The adsorption progress of dyes onto PRM can be divided into three stages; the first stage of fitted MO adsorption lines almost passes the origin while CR adsorption fitted lines could not pass, suggesting that the intraparticle diffusion plays a dominant role in MO adsorption onto PRM (likely the rate-limiting step) [8, 37]. For CR adsorption onto PRM, the adsorption progress could be jointly controlled by external mass transfer and intraparticle diffusion.


### 3.4. Adsorption Isotherms

The adsorption isotherms of MO and CR onto PRM were conducted using different initial dye concentrations (Figure5). As well investigated before, the adsorption capacity of CR exceeds the adsorption capacity of MO. With the increase of initial dye concentration, the adsorption capacity of CR rises dramatically while the adsorption capacity of MO reaches plateau related to the saturation of PRM. The adsorption isotherm data fitted by Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin isotherm models are tabulated in Figure 6 and Table 4.Figure 5
Effect of initial MO and CR concentration on PRM adsorption capacity (experiment conditions:adsorbentdosage=0.5 g/L, pH=4).
(a)(b)Figure 6
Isotherm fittings of (a) MO adsorption and (b) CR adsorption onto PRM (Langmuir isotherm: dash line, Freundlich isotherm: connecting line, and Temkin isotherm: dotted line) (experiment conditions:adsorbentdosage=0.5 g/L, pH=4).
(a)(b)Table 4
Kinetics parameters of Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin models.
T (°C)Langmuir constantFreundlich constantTemkin constantqmax (mg/g)kL (L/mg)RLR2KF (mg/g)nR2KT (J/mol)f (L/mg)R2MO15194.10.0170.370.997.801.610.9745.160.150.9925223.90.0190.340.989.441.600.9652.150.170.9935256.90.0220.310.9812.351.650.9462.880.170.99CR15314.90.0380.210.9924.311.810.9956.770.630.9725350.20.0510.160.9932.031.830.9770.920.630.9835389.50.0620.140.9940.501.840.9479.130.640.94Based on the fittedR2 value of Langmuir and Freundlich models, it is found that the Langmuir isotherm could better describe the adsorption of MO and CR onto PRM, which further proves that the adsorption of MO and CR is monolayer progress [38]. As shown in Table 4, based on the Langmuir isotherm model data, the maximum adsorption capacities are found to be 194.1, 223.9, and 256.9 mg/g for MO adsorption at 15, 25, and 35°C and 314.9, 350.2, and 389.5 mg/g for CR adsorption at 15, 25, and 35°C, respectively. This suggests that the adsorption progress of both dyes is endothermic reaction, and the increase of the environment temperature accelerates the adsorption progress. The separation factor (RL) of the Langmuir model could reflect the adsorption progress: RL<1 favorable, RL>1 unfavorable, and RL=1 linear. As shown in Table 5, the fitted RL values are in range of 0.31-0.85 for MO adsorption and 0.14-0.72 for CR adsorption. All values are within 1, indicating the adsorption of both dyes onto PRM is favorable, effective, and reversible [39, 40]. Moreover, the fitted R2 values of the Temkin model in MO and CR adsorption are relatively high, suggesting that there is a strong electrostatic interaction between MO, CR, and PRM which contributes to the adsorptive removal of both dyes [37, 41]. A detailed comparison table with other reported dye adsorbents is given in Table 6 and suggested the great performance of PRM in removing MO and CR from aqueous solutions.Table 5
RL values under different initial dye concentrations and temperatures.
T (°C)Initial concentration (mg/L)10205080100MO150.850.760.540.420.37250.840.720.510.400.34350.820.690.480.360.31CR150.720.570.340.250.21250.660.500.280.200.16350.620.450.240.170.14Table 6
Detailed adsorption performance of different reported adsorbents.
AdsorbentDyepHqmax (mg/g)ReferencePRMMO4194.1This workPRMCR4314.9This workCABI nanogoethiteCR3181.1[42]ZnO NRs-ACCR7142[43]γ-Fe2O3CR5.9208.33[44]3D hierarchical PbS/ZnO microspheresMO7159[45]Sugar scum powderMO7.215.24[46]


### 3.5. Adsorption Thermodynamic

As stated in Section3.3, the environmental temperature has a pronouncedly favored effect on the adsorption of dyes, and the adsorption progress of dyes onto PRM is accelerated by increased temperature. Thus, the detailed thermodynamic of the adsorption progress is of significance to investigating the adsorption of dyes onto PRM (Figure 7 and Table 7). In all cases, the negative values of ΔG0 hint that the adsorption of both dyes onto PRM is spontaneous which supports its future applications in dye adsorptive removal from aqueous solutions. The absolute value of ΔG0 increases with the increase of environment temperature, suggesting that the spontaneity degree increases at higher temperatures [47]. The positive values of ΔH0 (13.97 and 32.49 kJ/mol for MO and CR adsorption, respectively) confirm that the adsorption progress of both dyes onto PRM is endothermic [48]. The positive values of ΔS0 indicate that there is an increase in randomness at the solid/liquid interface [4]. The combination of positive value for ΔG0 and ΔH0 proves that the adsorption of MO and CR onto PRM is more spontaneous and favorable at higher environment temperatures.Figure 7
Thermodynamics of (a) MO and (b) CR onto PRM (experiment conditions:adsorbentdosage=0.5 g/L, pH=4).
(a)(b)Table 7
Fitting parameters of thermodynamic model.
AdsorbateΔH0 (kJ/mol)ΔS0 (J/(mol K))ΔG0 (kJ/mol)288.15 K298.15 K308.15 KMO13.9755.98-2.17-2.76-3.30CR32.49131.10-5.42-6.42-8.07


### 3.6. Column Study and Phytotoxicity Assessment

The column study is conducted in this research to further investigate the adsorption performance of both dyes in real applications. Continues treatment of 50 mg/L of MO and CR in a continuous column system is given in Figure8. The adsorption progress of both dyes follows the same trend although the adsorption saturation time is different. For MO adsorption, the adsorbent column is exhausted at 3500 min, while the adsorption saturation time for CR is more than 6000 min. Specifically, the concentrations of MO effluents increase slowly in the first 2000 min (~180 bed volumes) while a more rapid increase is observed afterwards. In contrast, no evident increase is observed before 4000 min for CR adsorption column (~360 bed volumes), indicating that the CR removal in column study is also better than MO removal which shares the same result from batch studies.Figure 8
Effectivity of PRM in removing MO and CR in column study.In order to have quantitative evaluations and thus have solid predictions on the adsorption performance in column studies and future applications, the Thomas model is used and its detailed parameters are summarized [28]. As shown in Table 8, the adsorption rate of the CR is higher than MO in column study which is in accordance with the fitted kinetic parameters in batch studies. In addition, the maximum adsorption capacity for MO and CR is 31.08 and 55.04 mg/g, respectively, and it is not surprising that the adsorption capacity in column studies is considerably lower than in batch studies (~20% of batch studies) [49]. Moreover, the calculated experimental adsorption capacity qe is close to the theoretical adsorption capacity qth, suggesting the Thomas model can describe the column adsorption performance appropriately.Table 8
Fitting parameters of Thomas model.
Adsorbateqe (mg/g)Thomas modelkth (L/mg/h)qth (mg/g)R2MO28.831.4831.080.94CR52.441.9155.040.97The effluents from the column study are used for further toxicity assessment (collected around 2000 min). The germination of bean sprouts is used as the indicator of PRM effectivity for eliminating anionic dyes in terms of aqueous toxicity. In this research, the deionized water is used as control group (no dye) and the influent (50 ppm for MO and CR) and effluent from the column study are used. After germinating the bean sprouts for 3 days under no light condition, the length of the roots is measured and summarized in Figure9. As shown in Figure 9(a), the mean root length of the control group is 7.06 cm and the length is reduced to 3.30 and 3.01 cm, for MO influents (MOINF) and CR influents (CRINF), respectively. For the bean sprouts treated with MO effluents (MOEFF) and CR effluents (CREFF), the mean root length is improved to 5.18 and 7.00 cm, respectively. This confirms the effectivity of PRM in reducing the toxicity of treated solutions. Moreover, the t-test suggests that the length difference between control and CREFF is not significant but the difference between the control group and MOEFF is significant. Conclusively, it can be reported that the PRM can treat the CR dyes into nontoxic solutions like deionized water (in terms of phytotoxicity) and MO dye into relatively toxic solutions, under the experimental conditions as conducted in this research.Figure 9
Toxicity assessment of PRM in removing MO and CR using bean sprout seeds (t-test, n=10).


## 3.1. Characterization of PRM

SEM images and FT-IR spectrum of raw red mud and PRM are given in Fig. S2&3. The polypyrrole modification improved the roughness of the adsorbent surface, with increased granular-like morphology occurred on the surface of PRM. In FT-IR spectrum, the pyrrole monomer ring at antisymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations was observed around 1540 and 1460 cm-1 [29]. Moreover, the band at 880 and 680 cm-1 was related to C-H and N-H bending vibrations. These results confirm the successful modification of polypyrrole onto the red mud. The SEM images and EDS of PRM after adsorption of MO and CR are shown in Fig. S4 and Fig. S5. The increase of S element in EDS confirmed the successful adsorption of MO and CR. After adsorption, the surface of PRM turned to a uniform and smooth surface without evident pores. Thus, in compliance with EDS results, it can be confirmed that both dyes are adsorbed onto the surface PRM.


## 3.2. Effect of Initial pH and Dosage

Before investigating the adsorption performance of MO and CR onto PRM, the effect of initial solution pH and adsorbent dosage should be thoroughly assessed due to their significant influence on adsorption progress [30]. The effect of initial solution pH on MO and CR adsorption is studied in the pH range from 3 to 11. In order to better understand the effect of initial solution pH on adsorbent itself, the point of zero charge (pHpzc) of the PRM is also investigated. As shown in Figure 1(a), the adsorption capacities of MO and CR share the same trend, and both achieve highest adsorption capacity at pH=4 and decrease with the increase of pH. These results are in accordance with previous researcher that highest adsorption capacity was achieved at pH of 2 [25]. At beginning, the adsorption seems to be deteriorated (pH=3); this is due to the decomposition of the PRM under extremely acid conditions [31]. The effect of initial pH on the solution iron concentration is displayed in Figure 2. Under pH=3, the Fe concentration exceeds 3 mg/L while it remained below 1 mg/L under other pH condition. This suggests that the extremely acid condition may lead to a potential decomposition of PRM; hence, future experiments are conducted above pH of 4. The pHpzc of PRM is around 6.5, which means that the surface of PRM is negatively charged at solution pH>6.5 and has a positively charged surface when pH is lower than 6.5. As previously mentioned, both dyes are typical anionic species which means that the positively charged surface is beneficial to the adsorption progress due to the electrostatic attraction between positively charged surface and negatively charged dyes [32]. The molecular formula of MO and CR is given in Table 1; both contain sulphonic acid groups (R-SO3Na) and turn into sulphonate groups (R-SO3-) at lower pH conditions. This is in accordance with the results in Figure 1(a) while lower pH results in higher adsorption capacity of both dyes. Therefore, the following experiments are conducted at an initial solution pH of 4 to achieve the highest adsorption capacity and prevent decomposition of PRM.Figure 1
(a) Effect of initial pH on MO and CR adsorption; (b)pHpzc of the adsorbent (experiment conditions: initialconcentration=100 mg/L and dosage=0.5 g/L).
(a)(b)Figure 2
Effect of initial pH on dissolved Fe concentration (experiment condition:dosage=1 g/L).The proper adsorbent dosage is considered to be an important influencing factor in the adsorption progress, since it could change the equilibrium system between adsorbent and adsorbate [33]. The influence of adsorbent dosage is carried out with dosage ranging from 0.25 to 5 g/L, at initial solution pH of 4 and initial dye concentration of 100 mg/L for both MO and CR. As illustrated in Figure 3(a), the removal rates of MO and CR increase with dosage ranging from 0.25 to 3 g/L and reach equilibrium above 3 g/L. With the dosage amount increase from 0.25 g/L, the vacant active sites increased significantly which leads to a higher dye removal rate. Under dosage of 3 g/L, CR is removed 100% in the solutions and further increase in adsorbent dosage is unnecessary. However, after dosage of 3 g/L, the removal rate of MO reaches equilibrium of around 70% with no significant signs of continuously increase. This could be due to the interaction behavior between adsorbents when the dosage increases to a certain level, the active sites might be interfered. The adsorption capacity under different absorbent dosage is given in Figure 3(b). It is obvious that higher dosage leads to lower adsorption capacity; hence, in consideration of the removal rate and adsorption capacity, the dosage of 1 g/L is chosen in following experiments.Figure 3
(a) Effect of adsorbent dosage on MO and CR removal; (b) dye adsorption capacity at different adsorbent dosages (experiment conditions:initialconcentration=100 mg/L, pH=4).
(a)(b)


## 3.3. Adsorption Kinetics

The adsorption kinetics are of great significance to evaluating the adsorption efficiency and progress of MO and CR onto PRM during the adsorption [34]. Time-dependent adsorption experiments were carried out with different initial dye concentrations (20, 50, and 100 mg/L). As shown in Figures 4(a) and 4(d), the remaining concentrations of MO and CR are recorded at different time intervals in 36 h. Obviously, the adsorption reactions show rapid adsorption rates at initial stage and stabilized afterwards [35]. At initial concentration of 20, 50, and 100 mg/L, the equilibrium MO concentration decreased to 11.0, 23.0, and 41.5 mg/L. However, the adsorption of CR is more effective, with equilibrium concentrations plunge to 0.0, 5.5, and 14.0 mg/L. The possible mechanism is that MO and CR have different molecular weights (MW), with the MW of CR reaches 696.7 g/mol which is twice that of MO. Hence, the adsorption capacities for MO and CR are comparable in terms of adsorbed molecules (mM/g).Figure 4
Effect of time on (a, d) MO and CR adsorption, (b, f) pseudo-first-order, (c, g) pseudo-second-order, and (d, h) intraparticle diffusion model fitting of MO and CR (experiment conditions:adsorbentdosage=1 g/L, pH=4).
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)The fitting parameters of pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, and intraparticle diffusion model are summarized in Tables2 and 3. For pseudo-first-order model, the calculated qe value is significantly different from the experimental value, and the correlation coefficients (R2) are not satisfying in both MO and CR data. By contrast, the calculated qe value in pseudo-second-order model is nearly close to the experimental value and each R2 value is above 0.99 for different initial concentration of MO and CR (Figures 4(b) and 4(e)). Hence, it can be concluded that the dye adsorption progress is controlled by chemical reactions, and the rate k2 and h could be used to describe the removal rates of MO and CR [36]. The removal kinetics of MO are clearly slower than CR, and the k2 value in pseudo-second-order of CR adsorption is higher than MO in every initial dye concentration. More importantly, the initial adsorption rate h of CR adsorption is significantly higher (i.e., with at least three times higher). After 1 hour adsorption of 100 mg/L dyes by PRM, the CR concentration is lowered to 28.7 mg/L while the MO concentration remains at 72.0 mg/L. This confirms the rapid removal capacity of CR by PRM adsorbent.Table 2
Kinetic parameters of pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order.
C0 (mg/L)qe (mg/g)Pseudo-first-order constantPseudo-second-order constantqe (mg/g)k1 (min-1)R2qe (mg/g)k2 (g/mg/min)h (mg/g/min)R2MO209.102.390.09030.869.070.191615.760.995027.106.890.15180.7327.780.047136.350.9910058.5026.950.16210.9760.610.015055.100.99CR2020.002.710.16320.9320.120.228792.580.995044.608.570.16360.9645.050.0694140.850.9910086.0015.850.16380.9086.210.0434322.560.99Table 3
Kinetics parameters of intraparticle diffusion model.
C0 (mg/L)Intra-particle diffusionKd1 (mg/g/min1/2)R2Kd2 (mg/g/min1/2)R2Kd3 (mg/g/min1/2)R2MO203.100.990.420.920.271.005014.290.982.580.990.541.0010020.100.997.650.950.451.00CR204.510.970.620.980.051.005012.890.862.040.990.141.0010024.060.972.000.981.161.00The fitting of intraparticle diffusion model is shown in Table3. The adsorption progress of dyes onto PRM can be divided into three stages; the first stage of fitted MO adsorption lines almost passes the origin while CR adsorption fitted lines could not pass, suggesting that the intraparticle diffusion plays a dominant role in MO adsorption onto PRM (likely the rate-limiting step) [8, 37]. For CR adsorption onto PRM, the adsorption progress could be jointly controlled by external mass transfer and intraparticle diffusion.


## 3.4. Adsorption Isotherms

The adsorption isotherms of MO and CR onto PRM were conducted using different initial dye concentrations (Figure5). As well investigated before, the adsorption capacity of CR exceeds the adsorption capacity of MO. With the increase of initial dye concentration, the adsorption capacity of CR rises dramatically while the adsorption capacity of MO reaches plateau related to the saturation of PRM. The adsorption isotherm data fitted by Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin isotherm models are tabulated in Figure 6 and Table 4.Figure 5
Effect of initial MO and CR concentration on PRM adsorption capacity (experiment conditions:adsorbentdosage=0.5 g/L, pH=4).
(a)(b)Figure 6
Isotherm fittings of (a) MO adsorption and (b) CR adsorption onto PRM (Langmuir isotherm: dash line, Freundlich isotherm: connecting line, and Temkin isotherm: dotted line) (experiment conditions:adsorbentdosage=0.5 g/L, pH=4).
(a)(b)Table 4
Kinetics parameters of Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin models.
T (°C)Langmuir constantFreundlich constantTemkin constantqmax (mg/g)kL (L/mg)RLR2KF (mg/g)nR2KT (J/mol)f (L/mg)R2MO15194.10.0170.370.997.801.610.9745.160.150.9925223.90.0190.340.989.441.600.9652.150.170.9935256.90.0220.310.9812.351.650.9462.880.170.99CR15314.90.0380.210.9924.311.810.9956.770.630.9725350.20.0510.160.9932.031.830.9770.920.630.9835389.50.0620.140.9940.501.840.9479.130.640.94Based on the fittedR2 value of Langmuir and Freundlich models, it is found that the Langmuir isotherm could better describe the adsorption of MO and CR onto PRM, which further proves that the adsorption of MO and CR is monolayer progress [38]. As shown in Table 4, based on the Langmuir isotherm model data, the maximum adsorption capacities are found to be 194.1, 223.9, and 256.9 mg/g for MO adsorption at 15, 25, and 35°C and 314.9, 350.2, and 389.5 mg/g for CR adsorption at 15, 25, and 35°C, respectively. This suggests that the adsorption progress of both dyes is endothermic reaction, and the increase of the environment temperature accelerates the adsorption progress. The separation factor (RL) of the Langmuir model could reflect the adsorption progress: RL<1 favorable, RL>1 unfavorable, and RL=1 linear. As shown in Table 5, the fitted RL values are in range of 0.31-0.85 for MO adsorption and 0.14-0.72 for CR adsorption. All values are within 1, indicating the adsorption of both dyes onto PRM is favorable, effective, and reversible [39, 40]. Moreover, the fitted R2 values of the Temkin model in MO and CR adsorption are relatively high, suggesting that there is a strong electrostatic interaction between MO, CR, and PRM which contributes to the adsorptive removal of both dyes [37, 41]. A detailed comparison table with other reported dye adsorbents is given in Table 6 and suggested the great performance of PRM in removing MO and CR from aqueous solutions.Table 5
RL values under different initial dye concentrations and temperatures.
T (°C)Initial concentration (mg/L)10205080100MO150.850.760.540.420.37250.840.720.510.400.34350.820.690.480.360.31CR150.720.570.340.250.21250.660.500.280.200.16350.620.450.240.170.14Table 6
Detailed adsorption performance of different reported adsorbents.
AdsorbentDyepHqmax (mg/g)ReferencePRMMO4194.1This workPRMCR4314.9This workCABI nanogoethiteCR3181.1[42]ZnO NRs-ACCR7142[43]γ-Fe2O3CR5.9208.33[44]3D hierarchical PbS/ZnO microspheresMO7159[45]Sugar scum powderMO7.215.24[46]


## 3.5. Adsorption Thermodynamic

As stated in Section3.3, the environmental temperature has a pronouncedly favored effect on the adsorption of dyes, and the adsorption progress of dyes onto PRM is accelerated by increased temperature. Thus, the detailed thermodynamic of the adsorption progress is of significance to investigating the adsorption of dyes onto PRM (Figure 7 and Table 7). In all cases, the negative values of ΔG0 hint that the adsorption of both dyes onto PRM is spontaneous which supports its future applications in dye adsorptive removal from aqueous solutions. The absolute value of ΔG0 increases with the increase of environment temperature, suggesting that the spontaneity degree increases at higher temperatures [47]. The positive values of ΔH0 (13.97 and 32.49 kJ/mol for MO and CR adsorption, respectively) confirm that the adsorption progress of both dyes onto PRM is endothermic [48]. The positive values of ΔS0 indicate that there is an increase in randomness at the solid/liquid interface [4]. The combination of positive value for ΔG0 and ΔH0 proves that the adsorption of MO and CR onto PRM is more spontaneous and favorable at higher environment temperatures.Figure 7
Thermodynamics of (a) MO and (b) CR onto PRM (experiment conditions:adsorbentdosage=0.5 g/L, pH=4).
(a)(b)Table 7
Fitting parameters of thermodynamic model.
AdsorbateΔH0 (kJ/mol)ΔS0 (J/(mol K))ΔG0 (kJ/mol)288.15 K298.15 K308.15 KMO13.9755.98-2.17-2.76-3.30CR32.49131.10-5.42-6.42-8.07


## 3.6. Column Study and Phytotoxicity Assessment

The column study is conducted in this research to further investigate the adsorption performance of both dyes in real applications. Continues treatment of 50 mg/L of MO and CR in a continuous column system is given in Figure8. The adsorption progress of both dyes follows the same trend although the adsorption saturation time is different. For MO adsorption, the adsorbent column is exhausted at 3500 min, while the adsorption saturation time for CR is more than 6000 min. Specifically, the concentrations of MO effluents increase slowly in the first 2000 min (~180 bed volumes) while a more rapid increase is observed afterwards. In contrast, no evident increase is observed before 4000 min for CR adsorption column (~360 bed volumes), indicating that the CR removal in column study is also better than MO removal which shares the same result from batch studies.Figure 8
Effectivity of PRM in removing MO and CR in column study.In order to have quantitative evaluations and thus have solid predictions on the adsorption performance in column studies and future applications, the Thomas model is used and its detailed parameters are summarized [28]. As shown in Table 8, the adsorption rate of the CR is higher than MO in column study which is in accordance with the fitted kinetic parameters in batch studies. In addition, the maximum adsorption capacity for MO and CR is 31.08 and 55.04 mg/g, respectively, and it is not surprising that the adsorption capacity in column studies is considerably lower than in batch studies (~20% of batch studies) [49]. Moreover, the calculated experimental adsorption capacity qe is close to the theoretical adsorption capacity qth, suggesting the Thomas model can describe the column adsorption performance appropriately.Table 8
Fitting parameters of Thomas model.
Adsorbateqe (mg/g)Thomas modelkth (L/mg/h)qth (mg/g)R2MO28.831.4831.080.94CR52.441.9155.040.97The effluents from the column study are used for further toxicity assessment (collected around 2000 min). The germination of bean sprouts is used as the indicator of PRM effectivity for eliminating anionic dyes in terms of aqueous toxicity. In this research, the deionized water is used as control group (no dye) and the influent (50 ppm for MO and CR) and effluent from the column study are used. After germinating the bean sprouts for 3 days under no light condition, the length of the roots is measured and summarized in Figure9. As shown in Figure 9(a), the mean root length of the control group is 7.06 cm and the length is reduced to 3.30 and 3.01 cm, for MO influents (MOINF) and CR influents (CRINF), respectively. For the bean sprouts treated with MO effluents (MOEFF) and CR effluents (CREFF), the mean root length is improved to 5.18 and 7.00 cm, respectively. This confirms the effectivity of PRM in reducing the toxicity of treated solutions. Moreover, the t-test suggests that the length difference between control and CREFF is not significant but the difference between the control group and MOEFF is significant. Conclusively, it can be reported that the PRM can treat the CR dyes into nontoxic solutions like deionized water (in terms of phytotoxicity) and MO dye into relatively toxic solutions, under the experimental conditions as conducted in this research.Figure 9
Toxicity assessment of PRM in removing MO and CR using bean sprout seeds (t-test, n=10).


## 4. Conclusion

In this study, the adsorption performance of two anionic dyes by a red mud-based adsorbent was investigated. The removal of dyes (CR and MO) from aqueous solution by the red mud-based adsorbent was investigated by batch and column studies. The successful loading of the polypyrrole onto the surface of red mud helps to improve the adsorption capacity of the adsorbent: 194.1 mg/g for MO adsorption and 314.9 mg/g for CR adsorption at 15°C, respectively. The highest adsorption capacity was obtained at pH 4 and decreased with the increase of pH. Thermodynamic results suggested that the adsorption progress of MO and CR onto PRM was endothermic and spontaneous. Phytotoxicity assessment of the column study effluents confirmed the effectivity of PRM in eliminating the dye toxicity in terms of germination of bean sprouts. Therefore, the PRM adsorbent could be applied as a promising adsorbent for decolorization in aqueous solutions.



---

*Source: 7694783-2021-11-01.xml*