# A Novel Concentric Annular-Ring Slot Dual-Band Circularly Polarized Microstrip Antenna

Authors: Yong Cheng; Hui Liu
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

A simple structure concentric annular-ring slot dual-band circularly polarized (CP) microstrip antenna operating at ISM band (2.45 GHz) and 5G band (3.5 GHz) is proposed in this paper. The antenna achieves dual-band operation by digging two concentric annular-ring slots on the ground. And on the angular positions with 45 degrees inclined of each annular slot, two bent structures are loaded to generate circularly polarized radiation. The radiation of this antenna is bidirectional, and the directions of rotation are opposite. The measured results of the annular-ring slot microstrip antenna show good performance of dual-band circularly polarized characteristics.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Compared to conventional antennas, the microstrip antenna get easier implementation of dual-band and circular polarization. There are many ways to realize circular polarization in microstrip antenna. Divided by number of feed points, there are two types: single feed and dual feed. Circularly polarized microstrip antenna with single feed is the simplest microstrip antenna. By introducing some kind of asymmetric degeneracy separation unit in the structure, the two resonant modes can be excited with two orthogonal linear polarizations with nearly equal amplitude and 90° phase difference to achieve CP characteristics [1]. Numerous studies for antennas of single-feed circular polarization can be found in the literature [2–7]. Another method is to excite two resonant modes to achieve circular polarization by dual feed. In contrast to the single-feed circularly polarized antenna, it is necessary to add a feed network including a phase shift network and a power division network [8] to ensure that these two modes are equal in amplitude and have a phase difference of 90°. That also makes the structure of such an antenna more complex than a single-feed circularly polarized antenna.In this paper, a novel concentric annular-ring slot dual-band CP microstrip antenna that operates at ISM band (2.45 GHz) and 5G band (3.5 GHz) is proposed and investigated. The antenna is a kind of single-layer slot antenna. There are two concentric ring slots of different size on the ground to generate dual-band radiation. The two symmetrical corners of the ring slots are added with two bent structures to achieve circular polarization. On the other side of the antenna, microstrip lines are used to excite the annular-ring slots with two bent structures. The feed line is located below the central axis of the annular-ring slot and finally realizes bidirectional circularly polarized radiation.


## 2. Antenna Design Principle

The structure diagram of both positive and negative side of the proposed dual-band LHCP annular-ring slot antenna is showed in Figure1. It is printed on a 60mm×60mm FR4 dielectric board with relative dielectric constant εr=4.4, loss tangent tanδ=0.02, and thickness h=1.6 mm. One side of the dielectric plate is coated with copper as the ground, and two concentric ring slots are digged on the ground to determine the resonant frequencies of the antenna. The simulated surface current distributions of the antenna operating at 2.45 GHz and 3.5 GHz are depicted in Figure 2. Dense current distributions are mainly on the outer ring at 2.45 GHz and on the inner ring at 3.5 GHz. They all have a periodic distribution, which is due to the circumferential length of the annular-ring slot being equal to the wavelength of the medium. In the current distribution diagram, it can be seen that the two annular-ring slots, respectively, control the generation of two resonant frequency points.Figure 1
Both positive and negative side of the proposed dual-band LHCP annular-ring slot antenna.Figure 2
The simulated surface current distributions of the antenna operating at (a) 2.45 GHz and (b) 3.5 GHz.
(a)
(b)Figures3 and 4 show the current distribution along the surface of the annular-ring slot antenna at 2.45 GHz and 3.5 GHz with different phase angles. It can be seen that the radiant current vector is mainly clockwise as the phase changes. Therefore, antenna exhibits LHCP radiation in the positive direction of the Z-axis and RHCP radiation in the negative direction of the Z-axis.Figure 3
The current distribution for different phase angles at 2.45 GHz.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure 4
The current distribution for different phase angles at 3.5 GHz.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The perturbation of the bent structure is, respectively, introduced at two diagonal positions of an oblique 45 degrees of each annular slot, so that the resonant modes of the two frequency bands are degenerately separated to form circularly polarized radiation. The bent structure of the inner ring is bent to the center of the ring, and the outer ring turns to the opposite direction away from the ring center. This structure not only can facilitate the nesting design of the two rings in geometry but also can minimize the affect between the two rings as much as possible. Thus, there is more room for adjusting the size of the annular-ring slot and the bent structure in the design. The other side of the dielectric plate is a microstrip, feeding the annular-ring slot on the ground, and the upper part of the feeder line is a quarter-wavelength impedance matching line to adjust the impedance of the antenna.The value of each parameter of the antenna needs to be finely adjusted and optimized. The values of the radius R1 and R2 of the two rings, respectively, determine the resonant frequencies of the antenna, and the width of the annular-ring slot has a great influence on the input impedance of the ring microstrip. wi1, wi2, li and wo1, wo2, lo, respectively, control the size of the bending structure on the inner and outer rings. As a key structure for generating circular polarization, the bent structure has a great influence on the frequency points and 3 dB bandwidth of the circular polarization axis ratio parameter. The impact of these parameters on antenna performance is introduced as below. Table1 shows the values of the parameters in the final design of the antenna.Table 1
Value of each parameter.
Parameter
R1
R2
wa1
wa2
wi1
wi2
wo1
Value (mm)
12
8.4
1.6
0.8
0.6
1.2
1.8
Parameter
wo2
li
lo
wt
wf
Lt
Lf
Value (mm)
2.8
3.1
1.7
0.6
3
21
6


### 2.1. Ring Resonant Structure Design

The resonant frequency (2.45 GHz) of the lower band depends mainly on the outer annular ring, while the upper one (3.5 GHz) depends on the inner annular ring. Therefore, the circumferential length of the annular-ring slot needs to satisfy the dielectric wavelength at the corresponding frequency point, which is(1)R1+wa12=λ1,R2+wa22=λ2.The width of the slot has a great influence on the impedance matching characteristics of the antenna. For example, when we change the width wa1 of the outer ring slot, the input-scattering parameter of the antenna is shown as in Figure5. The figure notes that when wa1=2.1 mm, the performance of the antenna’s input-scattering parameter at the low frequency band deteriorates as a whole, only −13 dB at 2.45 GHz. The lowest point of S11 curve shifts to lower frequency band. S11 curve is split into two bands at the high frequency band, and performance is not ideal. When wa1=1.1 mm, S11 curve is split into two peaks at the lower frequency band. Although the bandwidth is broadened, S11 is poor in the band center compared to wa1=1.6 mm. The higher frequency band has less influence and only slightly shifted toward higher frequencies. Therefore, the width of the outer ring slot is 1.6 mm.Figure 5
Simulated S11 with different values of wa1.


### 2.2. Bent Perturbation Structure Design

As a key structure for forming circularly polarized radiation, the size of the bent structure has a great influence on the axial ratio of the circular polarization performance of the antenna. When selecting, it is necessary to comprehensively consider the effects of various parameters such as length, width, and slot width.Still taking the outer ring as an example, the outer ring bent structure controls the axial ratio of 2.45 GHz frequency point at the lower frequency band. When the outward bent length lo takes different sizes, the axis ratio of the antenna at the lower frequency band is shown in Figure6. It can be seen from the figure that when lo=2.7 mm, 1.7 mm, and 0.7 mm, the minimum axial ratio is 2.5 dB, 1 dB, and 1.1 dB at 2.3 GHz, 2.44 GHz, and 2.54 GHz, respectively. The picture clearly demonstrates that with the increase of the length of the outward bent, the frequency point of the minimum axis ratio moves toward the lower frequency band. After debugging, the length of the outer ring bent is lo=1.7 mm.Figure 6
Simulated axial ratio with different values of lo.


### 2.3. Microstrip Feed Structure Design

The antenna is fed by a microstrip side feed. In the design, it is necessary to adjust the height position Lf and the width wt of the feeder to best match the antenna impedance at the two frequency bands.Figure7 shows the comparison of the antenna S11 curve when Lf is taken in different sizes. The figure shows that when Lf=5 mm, the performance of the antenna in both frequency bands is seriously deteriorated, resulting in S11 is −12.8 dB at 2.45 GHz and −10.5 dB at 3.5 GHz, which is just enough to meet less than −10 dB compared to the other two curves, and the frequency band is severely narrowed at 3.5 GHz. When Lf=7 mm, they all shift slightly to higher frequencies, although the two frequency bands S11 perform well. By comprehensive comparison, the band position and performance of S11 are better than the other two cases when Lf=6 mm, so the height position Lf of the quarter-wavelength matching line is chosen to be 6 mm.Figure 7
Simulated S11 with different values of Lf.


## 2.1. Ring Resonant Structure Design

The resonant frequency (2.45 GHz) of the lower band depends mainly on the outer annular ring, while the upper one (3.5 GHz) depends on the inner annular ring. Therefore, the circumferential length of the annular-ring slot needs to satisfy the dielectric wavelength at the corresponding frequency point, which is(1)R1+wa12=λ1,R2+wa22=λ2.The width of the slot has a great influence on the impedance matching characteristics of the antenna. For example, when we change the width wa1 of the outer ring slot, the input-scattering parameter of the antenna is shown as in Figure5. The figure notes that when wa1=2.1 mm, the performance of the antenna’s input-scattering parameter at the low frequency band deteriorates as a whole, only −13 dB at 2.45 GHz. The lowest point of S11 curve shifts to lower frequency band. S11 curve is split into two bands at the high frequency band, and performance is not ideal. When wa1=1.1 mm, S11 curve is split into two peaks at the lower frequency band. Although the bandwidth is broadened, S11 is poor in the band center compared to wa1=1.6 mm. The higher frequency band has less influence and only slightly shifted toward higher frequencies. Therefore, the width of the outer ring slot is 1.6 mm.Figure 5
Simulated S11 with different values of wa1.


## 2.2. Bent Perturbation Structure Design

As a key structure for forming circularly polarized radiation, the size of the bent structure has a great influence on the axial ratio of the circular polarization performance of the antenna. When selecting, it is necessary to comprehensively consider the effects of various parameters such as length, width, and slot width.Still taking the outer ring as an example, the outer ring bent structure controls the axial ratio of 2.45 GHz frequency point at the lower frequency band. When the outward bent length lo takes different sizes, the axis ratio of the antenna at the lower frequency band is shown in Figure6. It can be seen from the figure that when lo=2.7 mm, 1.7 mm, and 0.7 mm, the minimum axial ratio is 2.5 dB, 1 dB, and 1.1 dB at 2.3 GHz, 2.44 GHz, and 2.54 GHz, respectively. The picture clearly demonstrates that with the increase of the length of the outward bent, the frequency point of the minimum axis ratio moves toward the lower frequency band. After debugging, the length of the outer ring bent is lo=1.7 mm.Figure 6
Simulated axial ratio with different values of lo.


## 2.3. Microstrip Feed Structure Design

The antenna is fed by a microstrip side feed. In the design, it is necessary to adjust the height position Lf and the width wt of the feeder to best match the antenna impedance at the two frequency bands.Figure7 shows the comparison of the antenna S11 curve when Lf is taken in different sizes. The figure shows that when Lf=5 mm, the performance of the antenna in both frequency bands is seriously deteriorated, resulting in S11 is −12.8 dB at 2.45 GHz and −10.5 dB at 3.5 GHz, which is just enough to meet less than −10 dB compared to the other two curves, and the frequency band is severely narrowed at 3.5 GHz. When Lf=7 mm, they all shift slightly to higher frequencies, although the two frequency bands S11 perform well. By comprehensive comparison, the band position and performance of S11 are better than the other two cases when Lf=6 mm, so the height position Lf of the quarter-wavelength matching line is chosen to be 6 mm.Figure 7
Simulated S11 with different values of Lf.


## 3. Results

According to the design analysis and optimization results in Section2, the physical objects were fabricated and measured with a vector network analyzer and a near-field test system. Figure 8 shows the fabricated dual-band CP antenna.Figure 8
Photograph of the fabricated dual-band CP antenna.Figure9 shows the simulated and measured S11 of the proposed antenna. From the comparison in the figure, the measurement curve of S11 roughly coincides with the simulation. The measured −10 dB impedance bandwidths are about 14% ranging from 2.38 GHz to 2.74 GHz for the lower band and 10% ranging from 3.31 GHz to 3.66 GHz for the upper band. The S11 is −24.7 dB at 2.45 GHz and −17 dB at 3.5 GHz. Both bands are slightly offset to the higher frequencies compared to the simulation results, but still meet design specifications. The antenna exhibits good dual-band operation characteristics.Figure 9
Simulated and measured S11 of antenna.Figure10 plots the simulated and measured axis ratio varied with frequency in the positive Z-axis direction of the antenna and shows very good agreement at low frequency band. The measured CP bandwidth defined by −3 dB axial ratio (AR) are 30 MHz (2.43 GHz–2.46 GHz) for the lower band and 0.7 dB at 2.45 GHz. The measured −3 dB AR bandwidth for the upper band is 40 MHz (3.47 GHz–3.51 GHz) and 0.78 dB at 3.5 GHz. Comparing the measured S11 graph of Figure 7, it can be seen that those bands are completely covered by the two impedance bandwidths of the antenna; thus, those bands are the frequency bands where the antenna can achieve circular polarization.Figure 10
Simulated and measured axial-ratio of antenna.Figure11(a) represents the measured gain of the antenna varied with the frequency. The graph shows that the curve exhibits a bimodal characteristic with a high gain in both operating frequency bands, which is basically consistent with the dual-band characteristic of the antenna. The antenna gain at 2.45 GHz and 3.5 GHz are 7.3 dBc and 6 dBc, respectively. The measured efficiency of the antenna is shown in Figure 11(b). The antenna efficiency of the lower frequency band is generally higher than 80% and reaches 88.7% at 2.45 GHz. The higher frequency efficiency is generally higher than 75% and 79.2% at 3.5 GHz.Figure 11
(a) Measured gain and (b) efficiency of the antenna.
(a)
(b)Figures12 and 13 depict the measured radiation pattern at 2.45 GHz and 3.5 GHz, respectively. It can be seen that in the two E-plane patterns of the antenna operating at 2.45 GHz, the gain of the LHCP in the positive direction of the Z-axis is larger than 14.9 dB (XOZ plane) and 15.2 dB (YOZ plane) compared to the RHCP. Although the measured result is slightly inferior to the simulated one, the antenna still exhibits LHCP radiation in the positive direction of the Z-axis. In the negative direction of the Z-axis, the RHCP gain of the antenna is greater than the LHCP by 20.4 dB (XOZ plane) and 22 dB (YOZ plane), respectively, and the antenna radiates RHCP wave. The situation is the same as described above when the antenna is operating at 3.5 GHz. As can be seen from the radiation pattern, the antenna satisfies CP-operating characteristics at both frequencies and exhibits LHCP radiation in the positive direction of the Z-axis, and the radiation patterns in the negative direction of the Z-axis are RHCP.Figure 12
Measured radiation pattern at 2.45 GHz: (a) XOZ plane; (b) YOZ plane.
(a)
(b)Figure 13
Measured radiation pattern at 3.5 GHz: (a) XOZ plane; (b) YOZ plane.
(a)
(b)Finally, the proposed antenna is compared with other previously reported dual-band circularly polarized microstrip slot antennas in terms of gain, impedance matching bandwidth, and AR bandwidth, as tabulated in Table2. In [9], the circular patch of the antenna is slotted with four complementary spiral slots for dual-band radiation. In [10], a dual circularly polarized antenna augmented by four unequal linear slots is proposed. In [11], a coplanar waveguide- (CPW-) fed slot antenna with a C-shaped grounded strip is proposed for dual-sense circularly polarized radiation. In [12, 13], circular-shaped and hexagonal-shaped slot antenna using L-shaped stub along with microstrip feed line are studied and have the characteristics of bidirectional radiation. A square-ring slot antenna in [14], using symmetric perturbations structure, is designed for dual-sense CP radiation.Table 2
Comparisons between the proposed antenna and other dual-band circularly polarized microstrip slot antennas.
References
Overall size (mm)
Impedance matching bandwidth
AR bandwidth
Gain (dBic)
Radiation efficiency
[9]
50×50×1.6
2.7%/1%
9.6%/4%
−1.9/−6.9
—
[10]
80×80×1.52
26.7%/11.3%
6.1%/6.0%
5.2/6.3
—
[11]
70×70×1.6
106%
32%/5.6%
3.81/3.44
—
[12, 13]
62×60×0.8
8.6%/15.5%
15.7%/15.5%
4.3/3.0
—
[14]
70×70×3
25.8%/47%
4.3%/3.6%
3.3/4.5
—
This work
60×60×1.6
14%/10%
1.23%/1.15%
7.3/6
88.7%/79.2%In comparison to the designs [9–14], the proposed antenna possesses small size, high gain, and high efficiency in dual band.


## 4. Conclusion

A dual-band CP microstrip antenna with a very simple structure is proposed in this paper. We can get the lower and upper operating frequency bands which we need by changing the dimensions of the annual ring slots. CP radiation pattern can be achieved by two folded perturbation structures at the diagonally 45° diagonal position of each annular-ring slot, respectively. The antenna is designed, fabricated, and measured, and the measured results of the annular-ring microstrip antenna show good performance of a dual-band CP operation. The measured impedance bandwidths for both bands are above 350 MHz, and the bandwidth of axial ratio (AR) less than −3 dB is about 30 MHz for lower and upper frequency bands. The gain of the antenna in both of the two bands is larger than 6 dBic.



---

*Source: 7560567-2018-12-13.xml*