# A Compact Frequency Reconfigurable Antenna for LTE Mobile Handset Applications

Authors: Munyong Choi; Hyunho Wi; Byeonggwi Mun; Yonghyun Yoon; Hyunwoo Lee; Byungje Lee
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

A compact (8 × 62 × 5 mm3; 2.48 cc) frequency reconfigurable antenna that uses electrical switching with PIN diodes is proposed for the low frequency LTE band (699 MHz–862 MHz), high frequency LTE band (2496 MHz–2690 MHz), GSM850/900 bands (824 MHz–960 MHz), and DCS/PCS/WCDMA bands (1710 MHz–2170 MHz). The penta-band PIFA is first designed for GSM850/900/DCS/PCS/WCDMA bands by using two slits and ground pins within a limited antenna volume (8 × 54.6 × 5 mm3; 2.18 cc). The frequency reconfigurable antenna based on this penta-band PIFA is thus proposed to additionally cover all LTE bands. The proposed antenna has two PIN diodes with an optimal location. For State 1 (PIN diode 1: ON state, PIN diode 2: OFF state), the proposed antenna covers the low frequency LTE band, DCS/PCS/WCDMA bands, and high frequency LTE band. For State 2 (PIN diode 1: OFF state, PIN diode 2: ON state), the antenna covers the GSM850/900 bands. Simulated and measured results show that the total efficiency of the proposed antenna was greater than 40% for all operating frequency bands.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The antenna design for modern mobile wireless communications has faced serious technical challenges as a result of the trend for mobile handset antennas to be designed smaller due to the user requirements for industrial design. Mobile handset antennas are also required to support a variety of wireless communication standards, including GSM850/900 and DCS/PCS/WCDMA. Furthermore, Long Term Evolution (LTE) has recently become a key technology for mobile wireless communication services because LTE provides greater system capacity and coverage, a reliable high peak data rate, and an improvement in the spectrum efficiency through the use of high-performance antennas. Table1 shows the frequency spectrum allocation for mobile wireless communication services, including GSM850/900 bands (824–960 MHz), DCS/PCS/WCDMA bands (1710–2170 MHz), low frequency LTE band (699–862 MHz), and high frequency LTE band (2496–2690 MHz). The frequency for the LTE 12/13/17/20 bands (699–823 MHz) was recently allocated at lower frequencies than even the adjacent GSM850/900 bands, so the most important issue at this time is to design a compact mobile handset antenna for lower frequency bands that can operate within a small volume.Table 1
Frequency spectrum allocation in mobile wireless communication services.
Band class
Uplink (MHz)
Downlink (MHz)
GSM
GSM 850
824~849
869~894
GSM 900
880~915
925~960
PCS 1800
1710~1785
1805~1880
PCS 1900
1850~1910
1930~1990
CDMA
BC0 (850)
824~849
869~894
BC1 (1900)
1850~1910
1930~1990
WCDMA
B5 (850)
824~849
869~894
B8 (900)
880~915
925~960
B2 (1900)
1850~1910
1930~1990
B1 (2100)
1920~1980
2110~2170
LTE (TDD)
B38
2570~2620
2570~2620
B41
2496~2690
2496~2690
LTE (FDD)
B1
1920~1980
2110~2170
B2
1850~1910
1930~1990
B3
1710~1785
1805~1880
B4
1710~1755
2110~2155
B5
824~849
869~894
B7
2500~2570
2620~2690
B8
880~915
925~960
B12
699~716
729~746
B13
778~787
746~756
B17
704~716
734~746
B20
823~862
791~821
B25
1850~1915
1930~1995If all of the bands shown in Table1 are to be considered, the mobile handset antenna is required to operate within two main bands: a low frequency (LF) band (699–960 MHz) and a high frequency (HF) band (1710–2690 MHz). When a mobile handset antenna operates at the LF band, the impedance bandwidth that is required is of about 31.6%. It is physically difficult to cover the LF band by using conventional mobile antennas within a small volume, such as with PIFA, monopole, slot, and loop antennas [1]. The most critical issue in the design of a mobile handset antenna is thus to achieve a wide impedance bandwidth in the LF band within a limited volume. In order to broaden the impedance bandwidth in lower frequency bands, the mobile handset PCB ground plane has been generally used as a radiator since the antenna itself and the ground plane can be treated as two arms of a half-wavelength dipole antenna at around GSM850/900 bands (824–960 MHz) [2]. In the low frequency LTE band (699–862 MHz), the length of the ground plane of the mobile handset is nevertheless small in terms of its wavelength, so it is not possible for it to act as one arm of a half-wavelength dipole antenna. As a result, various antenna design techniques have been studied to achieve wideband and multiband capabilities while maintaining a compact antenna volume [3–6]. In addition, parasitic elements or branches in conjunction with a PIFA or monopole antenna have been studied to obtain a wider impedance bandwidth and multiband operation [3]. The ground plane has also been modified by inserting slots or slits to improve its impedance bandwidth [5, 6]. A combination of multiple resonant modes such as PIFA and slot, PIFA and loop, monopole and loop, and wideband or multiband operation can be obtained within a compact volume for mobile handset antennas [4]. However, most prior studies have not been able to cover the entire range of commercial mobile communication service bands, including all LTE bands. Although one of the designed antennas may cover all of the required impedance bandwidth (699–960 MHz and 1710–2690 MHz), such an antenna occupies a large volume and is difficult to implement for various mobile handsets because it has critical limitations when considering constraints in terms of the suitability for mass production, complexity of the circuit, and a high manufacturing cost.Fortunately, simultaneous operation is not required in all service bands for mobile wireless communications. This means that the operating frequency of an antenna can be changed at any given time to operate within a required subset of the total number of bands. Therefore, frequency reconfigurable antennas have received a significant amount of attention due to their applicability for mobile wireless communications. Their properties have been adapted to achieve selectivity in frequency, bandwidth, polarization, and gain, which can result in a significant reduction in the overall size of the multimode, multiband wireless communication systems and can replace multiple single-function legacy antennas. Frequency reconfigurable antennas have also been studied by using several techniques with varactor diodes, microelectromechanical system (MEMS) switches [7], and PIN diodes [8, 9]. However, varactor diodes exhibit a voltage dependent capacitance and are sensitive not only to an externally supplied DC voltage but also to a directly induced RF voltage. To apply MEMS switches in mobile handsets, the complexity of the circuit and the high manufacturing costs should be considered. The PIN diode switching technique is very promising for use with frequency reconfigurable technology due to its significant advantages in terms of its easy realization, simple bias circuit, and low dissipated power loss.In this paper, penta-band PIFA with two slit antennas is first designed to cover existing 3G service bands (GSM850/900/DCS/PCS/WCDMA) within a compact antenna volume. Then, the frequency reconfigurable antenna is proposed to cover 3G service bands (GSM850/900 bands, 824–960 MHz; DCS/PCS/WCDMA bands, 1710–2170 MHz) and the entire range of LTE bands (low frequency LTE band, 699–862 MHz; high frequency LTE band, 2496–2690 MHz) by embedding ground pins and two PIN diodes on the optimum location of the ground plane of the penta-band PIFA while minimizing the increase in the antenna volume.


## 2. Penta-Band PIFA Design

To cover commercial 3G bands (GSM850/900/DCS/PCS/WCDMA), the penta-band PIFA was first designed with two slits and ground pins within a limited antenna volume. Figure1 shows overview and detailed dimensions of the proposed penta-band PIFA that is printed on the antenna supporter with two slits. The outer housing case (Epoxy SLA resin + polyacrylate; εr = 3.13, tanδ=0.02) has dimensions of 126 × 66 × 8.9 mm3. The substrate (FR-4; εr=4, tanδ=0.02) has an overall size of 7 × 62 × 1 mm3, and the PCB ground plane has an overall size of 115 × 62 × 1 mm3, which is based on the size of a commercial smartphone. The antenna support (Epoxy SLA resin + polyacrylate; εr=3.13, tanδ=0.02) has a volume of 62 × 8 × 5 mm3. Figure 2 shows the simulated S11 of the proposed penta-band PIFA. This antenna can cover the penta-band (VSWR < 3) for GSM850/900/DCS/PCS/WCDMA bands. Multiband operation and a wide bandwidth were achieved by combining the PIFA mode and two slit modes. The surface current distribution was verified to be as shown in Figure 3. The GSM850/900 bands are covered by the fundamental resonant mode of the PIFA as shown in Figure 3(a). DCS/PCS/WCDMA bands were covered in combination with the half-wavelength slit resonant mode for Slit 1 and Slit 2 as shown in Figures 3(b) and 3(c), respectively. The 3rd harmonic resonant mode for PIFA was achieved at around 3 GHz, as shown in Figure 3(d). Figure 4 shows the current path of each resonant mode in an unfolded view, as shown in Figure 1(c). Each resonant mode of the proposed penta-band PIFA was independently achieved at each resonant frequency. Figure 5 shows the simulated S11 for differenta,b, andc lengths, as shown in Figure 1(c). Figures 5(a) and 5(b) show that the impedance can be matched around 1800 MHz and 1900 MHz by varying the length ofa andb, respectively, so the DCS/PCS/WCDMA bands are easily achieved by optimally tuning the length ofa andb. Figure 5(c) shows that the resonant frequencies of the proposed antenna can be controlled by the length ofc. When the length forc increases, the resonant frequencies of the lower and higher bands move downward. Although the proposed penta-band PIFA has a wide bandwidth and multiband operation within a compact volume, the low frequency LTE band and the high frequency LTE band are not covered, as shown in Figure 2. In order to cover the entire LTE frequency band, an additional resonant mode is required at the low frequency LTE band (699–862 MHz) and the 3rd harmonic resonant mode of the penta-band PIFA at 3026 MHz is needed to shift the high frequency LTE band (2496–2690 MHz). In the next section, the frequency reconfigurable antenna in conjunction with this proposed penta-band PIFA is proposed by embedding ground pins and two PIN diodes to cover the 3G service bands (GSM850/900/DCS/PCS/WCDMA bands) and the entire range of LTE bands.Figure 1
The geometry of the proposed penta-band PIFA: (a) overall view, (b) detailed dimensions, and (c) unfolded view of the radiating elements.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 2
SimulatedS11 of the proposed penta-band PIFA.Figure 3
Simulated surface current distribution at (a) 922 MHz, (b) 1802 MHz, (c) 1964 MHz, and (d) 3026 MHz.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure 4
Illustration of the current distribution in an unfolded view: (a) at 922 MHz, (b) at 1802 MHz, (c) at 1964 MHz, and (d) at 3026 MHz.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure 5
SimulatedS11 by varying the length ofa,b, andc, as shown in Figure 1(c); (a) varying the length ofa,b = 19.4 mm, andc = 4 mm, (b)a = 2.5 mm, varying the length ofb, andc = 4 mm, and (c)a = 2.5 mm,b = 19.4 mm, and varying the length ofc.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3. Proposed Frequency Reconfigurable Antenna Design

In the previous section, the penta-band PIFA is designed for the GSM850/900/DCS/PCS/WCDMA bands, and the 3rd harmonic resonant mode occurred at around 3 GHz. In order to additionally cover both the low frequency LTE band and the high frequency LTE band, the proposed penta-band PIFA is first modified with a longerc length and an additional ground pin, as shown in Figure 6. The length ofc slightly increases to 11.4 mm without an increase in the antenna height and support. As shown in Figure 5(c), the resonant frequencies of the penta-band PIFA move downward as the length forc increases. An additional ground pin is added at the upper right side, so the resonant frequencies of the modified penta-band PIFA further shift downward as shown in Figure 7. Then, two PIN diodes (PIN diode 1 and PIN diode 2) are finally embedded as ground pins at the upper left side and the upper right side of the proposed antenna, as shown in Figure 8(a). Figures 8(b) and 8(c) show a photograph of the proposed antenna without/with an outer housing case, respectively. Figure 9 shows the simulated S11 of the proposed antenna with the switching technique. For State 1 (PIN diode 1: ON state, PIN diode 2: OFF state), the proposed antenna operates in the low frequency LTE band, DCS/PCS/WCDMA bands, and high frequency LTE band. It is observed that the first and the 3rd harmonic resonant modes now shift downward to cover the low frequency LTE band and the high frequency LTE band, respectively, by using the increasedc length (11.4 mm) and an additional ground pin at the upper right side. For State 2 (PIN diode 1: OFF state, PIN diode 2: ON state), the GSM850/900 bands are operated by the resonant mode of the PIFA in which the ground pin is connected to the PIN diode 2 at upper right side. Figures 10(a) and 10(b) show the simulated surface current distribution of the proposed antenna at 780 MHz in the low frequency LTE band (State 1) and at 920 MHz in the GSM850/900 bands (State 2), respectively. It is noticed that the proposed antenna operates independently at each state (State 1 or State 2). Figures 11(a) and 11(b) also show the simulated surface current distribution of the proposed antenna including the ground plane at 780 MHz in the low frequency LTE band (State 1) and at 920 MHz in the GSM850/900 bands (State 2), respectively. It is observed that the strength of the surface current on the ground plane is quite lower than that on radiators, so the radiation efficiency of the proposed antenna is not significantly affected by the user’s hand effects. Increasing the length of a current path with an additional ground pin at the upper right side and combing two operation states (State 1 and State 2) with the switching technique, a wide impedance bandwidth at low frequency band is achieved. Therefore, the proposed antenna can effectively cover the entire range of LTE bands as well as existing commercial bands (GSM850/900/DCS/PCS/WCDMA) while conforming to a tightly constrained antenna volume. To demonstrate the validity of the proposed antenna switching scheme, the proposed antenna with two PIN diodes and bias network is designed as shown in Figure 12. The bias voltage for Vcontrol is set to 3 V with a coin battery. In the bias network, theR1 andR2 resistors are used to control the bias current, theC1 andC2 capacitors are used for DC blocking, the Cb1 and Cb2 capacitors are used for the bypass, and theL1 andL2 inductors are used for RF choking. The values of each component in the bias network are as follows:R1 =R2 = 300 Ω,C1 =C2 = 100 pF, Cb1 = Cb2 = 100 pF, andL1 =L2 = 100 nH. The series resistance of the PIN diode has a 0.5 Ω maximum at 10 mA in the forward biased state. SMP1322-040LF from SKYWORKS is used to minimize the dissipated power loss due to the series resistance of the PIN diode [10]. Figure 13(a) shows the simulated and measured S11 for the proposed antenna. The simulated and the measured results are in good agreement with each other. Figures 13(b) and 13(c) show the total efficiency that was simulated and measured for the low and high frequency bands, respectively. The proposed antenna has a total efficiency greater than 40% for all operating frequency bands. The antenna efficiency is measured in an OTA chamber from HOWLAND based on CTIA 3.3 [11], which is generally acceptable for practical mobile handset antenna applications in industry [12]. Figures 14(a), 14(b), 14(c), and 14(d) show the simulated and measured radiation patterns at 800 MHz, 920 MHz, 1950 MHz, and 2600 MHz, respectively. The simulated and measured results agree well.Figure 6
The structure of the modified penta-band PIFA.Figure 7
SimulatedS11 of the modified penta-band PIFA with the increased length ofc = 11.4 mm and an additional ground pin at the upper right side.Figure 8
The structure of the proposed antenna: (a) overall view, (b) photograph of the proposed antenna without the outer housing case, and (c) photograph of the proposed antenna with the outer housing case.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 9
SimulatedS11 of the proposed antenna.Figure 10
Simulated surface current distribution of the proposed antenna: (a) at 780 MHz (State 1) and (b) at 920 MHz (State 2).
(a)
(b)Figure 11
Simulated surface current distribution of the proposed antenna including the ground plane: (a) at 780 MHz (State 1) and (b) at 920 MHz (State 2).
(a)
(b)Figure 12
The bias circuit of the PIN diodes feed network.Figure 13
Simulated and measured results of the proposed antenna: (a)S11, (b) total efficiency at the low frequency band, and (c) total efficiency at the high frequency band.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 14
Simulated and measured radiation patterns of the proposed antenna (XY-plane): (a) 800 MHz, (b) 920 MHz, (c) 1950 MHz, and (d) 2600 MHz.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 4. Conclusion

A compact frequency reconfigurable multiband antenna was proposed to cover most commercial 3G/4G mobile applications within a very small antenna volume of 8 × 62 × 5 mm3 (2.48 cc). A compact penta-band PIFA with the use of two slits and ground pins for 3G mobile applications was designed within a limited antenna volume (8 × 54.6 × 5 mm3; 2.18 cc). Then, two PIN diodes were optimally added with an additional ground pin in conjunction with the modified penta-band PIFA, and the proposed antenna can also cover the entire range of LTE bands. For State 1, the proposed antenna covers the low frequency LTE band, DCS/PCS/WCDMA bands, and high frequency LTE band. For State 2, it covers the GSM850/900 bands. The total efficiency of the proposed antenna was greater than 40% for all operating frequency bands. The compact frequency reconfigurable antenna proposed in this paper is therefore expected to be widely applicable as a mobile handset antenna.



---

*Source: 764949-2015-06-21.xml*