# Asymptotic Stability of Fractional Stochastic Neutral Differential Equations with Infinite Delays

Authors: R. Sakthivel; P. Revathi; N. I. Mahmudov
Journal: Abstract and Applied Analysis
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

We study the existence and asymptotic stability inpth moment of a mild solution to a class of nonlinear fractional neutral stochastic differential equations with infinite delays in Hilbert spaces. A set of novel sufficient conditions are derived with the help of semigroup theory and fixed point technique for achieving the required result. The uniqueness of the solution of the considered problem is also studied under suitable conditions. Finally, an example is given to illustrate the obtained theory.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The stochastic differential equations have been widely applied in science, engineering, biology, mathematical finance and in almost all applied sciences. In the present literature, there are many papers on the existence and uniqueness of solutions to stochastic differential equations (see [1–4] and references therein). More recently, Chang et al. [5] investigated the existence of square-mean almost automorphic mild solutions to nonautonomous stochastic differential equations in Hilbert spaces by using semigroup theory and fixed point approach. Fu and Liu [2] discussed the existence and uniqueness of square-mean almost automorphic solutions to some linear and nonlinear stochastic differential equations and in which they studied the asymptotic stability of the unique square-mean almost automorphic solution in the square-mean sense. On the other hand, recently fractional differential equations have found numerous applications in various fields of science and engineering [6]. The existence and uniqueness results for abstract stochastic delay differential equation driven by fractional Brownian motions have been studied in [7]. In particular the stability investigation of stochastic differential equations has been investigated by several authors [8–15].LetK and H be two real separable Hilbert spaces with inner products 〈·,·〉K and 〈·,·〉H, respectively. We denote their norms by |·|K and |·|H. To avoid confusion we just use 〈·,·〉 for the inner product and |·| for the norm. Let {ei}i=1∞ be an orthonormal basis of K. Throughout the paper, we assume that (Ω,ℱ,P;𝔽)(𝔽={ℱt}t≥0) is a complete filtered probability space satisfying that ℱ0 contains all P-null sets of ℱ. Suppose {W(t):t≥0} is cylindrical K-valued Brownian motion with a trace class operator Q, denote tracQ=∑i=1∞‍λi=λ<∞, which satisfies that Qei=λiei. So, actually, W(t)=∑i=1∞‍λiWi(t)ei, where {Wi(t)}i=1∞ are mutually independent one-dimensional standard Brownian motions. Define ℒ(K,H) as the set of all bounded linear operators A:K→H with the following norm: (1)|A|=(∑i=1∞‍|Aei|2)1/2<∞.
It is obvious that ℒ(K,H) is a Hilbert space with an inner product induced by the above norm. Let A∈ℒ(K,H) be called a Hilbert-Schmidt operator. We further assume that the filtration is generated by the cylindrical Brownian motion W(·) and augmented, that is, (2)ℱt=σ{W(s);0≤s≤t}∨𝒩,
where 𝒩 is the P-null sets.The qualitative properties of stochastic fractional differential equations have been considered only in few publications. El-Borai et al. [16] studied the existence uniqueness, and continuity of the solution of a fractional stochastic integral equation. Ahmed [17] derived a set of sufficient conditions for controllability of fractional stochastic delay equations by using a stochastic version of the well-known Banach fixed point theorem and semigroup theory. Moreover, theory of neutral differential equations is of both theoretical and practical interests. For a large class of electrical networks containing lossless transmission lines, the describing equations can be reduced to neutral differential equations. However, to the author's best knowledge no work has been reported in the present literature regarding the existence, uniqueness, and asymptotic stability of mild solutions for neutral stochastic fractional differential equations with infinite delay in Hilbert spaces. Motivated by this consideration, in this paper we consider the nonlinear fractional neutral stochastic differential equations with infinite delays in the following form: (3)cDtα[X(t)+g(t,X(t-τ(t)))]=AX(t)+f(t,X(t-τ(t)))+σ(t,X(t-ν(t)))dW(t)dt,t≥0,(4)X0(·)=φ∈ℬℱ([m(0),0],H),
where A is the infinitesimal generator of a strongly continuous semigroup of a bounded linear operator S(t),t≥0 in the Hilbert space H,f:R+×H→H,σ:R+×H→ℒ(K,H) are two Borel measurable mappings, and g:R+×H→H is continuous mapping. The fractional derivative cDtα,α∈(0,1) is understood in the Caputo sense. In addition, let τ(t),ν(t)∈C(R+,R+) satisfy t-τ(t)→∞, t-ν(t)→∞ as t→∞. Let m(0)=max{infs≥0(s-τ(s)),infs≥0(s-ν(s))}. Here ℬℱ0([m(0),0],H) denote the family of all almost surely bounded, ℱ0-measurable, continuous random variables φ(t):[m(0),0]→H with norm |φ|ℬ=supm(0)≤t≤0E|φ(t)|H. Throughout this paper, we assume that p≥2 is an integer.


## 2.   Preliminaries and Basic Properties

LetA be the infinitesimal generator of an analytic semigroup S(t) in H. Then, (A-ηI) is invertible and generates a bounded analytic semigroup for η>0 large enough. Therefore, we can assume that the semigroup S(t) is bounded and the generator A is invertible. It follows that (-A)η,0<η≤1 can be defined as a closed linear invertible operator with its domain D(-A)η being dense in H. We denote by Hη the Banach space D(-A)η endowed with the norm |x|η=|(-A)ηx|, which is equivalent to the graph norm of (-A)η. For more details about semigroup theory, one can refer [18].Lemma 1 (see [18]).
Suppose that the preceding conditions are satisfied.(a)
Let0<η≤1, then Hη is a Banach space.(b)
If0<ν≤η, then the embedding Hν⊂Hη is compact whenever the resolvent operator of A is compact.(c)
For everyη∈(0,1], there exists a positive constant Cη such that ∥AηS(t)∥≤Cη/tη,t>0.Definition 2 (see [19]).
The fractional integral of orderq with the lower limit 0 for a function f is defined as
(5)Iαf(t)=1Γ(α)∫0t‍f(s)(t-s)1-αds,t>0,q>0
provided the righthand side is pointwise defined on [0,∞), where Γ(·) is the gamma function.Definition 3 (see [19]).
The Caputo derivative of orderα for a function f:[0,∞)→R can be written as
(6)cDαf(t)=1Γ(n-α)∫0t‍f(n)(s)(t-s)α+1-nds=In-αf(n)(t),t>0,0≤n-1<α<n.
If f is an abstract function with values in H, then integrals which appear in the above definitions are taken in Bochner's sense.
According to Definitions2 and 3, it is suitable to rewrite the stochastic fractional equation (3) in the equivalent integral equation
(7)X(t)=[φ(0)+g(0,φ)]-g(t,X(t-τ(t)))+1Γ(α)∫0t‍(t-s)α-1[dW(s)dsAX(s)+f(s,X(s-τ(s)))+1Γ(α)∫0t‍(t-s)α-1+σ(s,X(s-ν(s)))dW(s)ds]ds.
In view of  [18, Lemma 3.1] and by using Laplace transform, we present the following definition of mild solution of (3).Definition 4.
A stochastic process{X(t):t∈[0,T]},0≤T<∞ is called a mild solution of (3), if  (i)
X(t) is ℱt-adapted and is measurable, t≥0;(ii)
X(t)∈H has càdlàg paths on t∈[0,T] almost surely and for each t∈[0,T], the function (t-s)α-1ATα(t-s)g(s,X(s-τ(s))) is integrable such that the following integral equation is satisfied:
(8)X(t)=Sα(t)[φ(0)+g(0,φ)]-g(t,X(t-τ(t)))-∫0t‍(t-s)α-1ATα(t-s)g(s,X(s-τ(s)))ds+∫0t‍(t-s)α-1Tα(t-s)f(s,X(s-τ(s)))ds+∫0t‍(t-s)α-1Tα(t-s)σ(s,X(s-ν(s)))dW(s),(iii)
X0(·)=φ∈ℬℱ([m(0),0],H), where
(9)Sα(t)X=∫0∞‍ηα(θ)S(tαθ)Xdθ,Tα(t)X=α∫0∞‍θηα(θ)S(tαθ)Xdθ
with ηα a probability density function defined on (0,∞).The following properties ofSα(t) and Tα(t) [18] are useful.Lemma 5.
Under previous assumptions onS(t),t≥0 and A,  (i)
Sα(t) and Tα(t) are strongly continuous;(ii)
for anyX∈H,β∈(0,1) and θ∈(0,1] one has
(10)ATα(t)X=A1-βTα(t)AβX,|AθTα(t)|≤αCθtαθΓ(2-θ)Γ(1+α(1-θ)),t∈[0,T].Definition 6.
Letp≥2 be an integer. Equation (8) is said to be stable in pth moment if for arbitrarily given ϵ>0 there exists a δ>0 such that
(11)E(supt≥0|X(t)|p)<ϵ,when|φ|ℬ<δ.Definition 7.
Letp≥2 be an integer. Equation (8) is said to be asymptotically stable in pth moment if it is stable in pth moment and, for any φ∈ℬℱ([m(0,0)],H), it holds
(12)limT→∞E(supt≥T|X(t)|p)=0.


## 3. Main Result

In this section, we prove the existence, uniqueness, and stability of the solution to fractional stochastic equation (3) by using the Banach fixed point approach.In order to obtain the existence and stability of the solution to (3), we impose the following assumptions on (3).(H1)
There exist constantsM≥1 and a>0 such that |S(t)|≤Me-at.(H2)
There exists a positive constantL1, for every t≥0 and x,y∈H, such that
(13)|f(t,x)-f(t,y)|≤L1|x-y|,|σ(t,x)-σ(t,y)|≤L1|x-y|.(H3)
There exist0<β<1 such that g is Hβ-valued, (-A)βg is continuous and there exists a positive constant Mg such that
(14)|(-A)βg(t,x)-(-A)βg(t,y)|≤Mg|x-y|
for every t≥0 and x,y∈H.(H4)
Θ=[4(p-1)|(-A)(-β)|pMgp+4p-1MgpK(α,β)(Tαβ/αβ)p+4p-1αpMpL1pLp+ 4p-1CpαpMpL1pL′(p/2)]<1, where CP=(p(p-1))/2p/2, Mt=∫0tθηα(θ)e-atαθdθ, L=∫0TM(t-s)(t-s)α-1ds and L′=∫0T‍[Mt-s(t-s)α-1]2ds.In addition, in order to derive the stability of the solution, we further assume that(H5)
(15)g(t,0)=0,f(t,0)=0,σ(t,0)=0.
It is obvious that (3) has a trivial solution when φ=0 under the assumption (H5).Lemma 8.
Letp≥2,t>0 and let Φ be an ℒ(K,H)-valued, predictable process such that E∫0t‍|Φ(s)|ℒpds<∞. Then,
(16)sup0≤s≤tE|∫0s‍Φ(u)dW(u)|p≤(p(p-1)2)p/2(∫0t‍(E|Φ(s)ℒp|)2/p)p/2.Theorem 9.
Letp≥2 be an integer. Assume that the conditions (H1)–(H4) hold, then the nonlinear fractional neutral stochastic differential equation (3) is asymptotically stable in the pth moment.Proof.
Denote by𝔹 the space of all ℱ0-adapted process ϕ(t,w):[m(0),0]×Ω→R, which is almost surely continuous in t for fixed w∈Ω and satisfies ϕ(t,w)=φ(t) for t∈[m(0),0] and E|ϕ(t,w)|p→0 as t→0. It is then routine to check that 𝔹 is a Banach space when it is equipped with a norm defined by |φ|𝔹=supt≥0E|φ(t)|Hp. Define the nonlinear operator Ψ:𝔹→𝔹 such that (ΨX)(t)=φ(t),t∈[m(0),0] and, for t≥0,
(17)(ΨX)(t)=Sα(t)[φ(0)+g(0,φ)]-g(t,X(t-τ(t)))-∫0t(t-s)α-1ATα(t-s)g(s,X(s-τ(s)))ds+∫0t‍(t-s)α-1Tα(t-s)f(s,X(s-τ(s)))ds+∫0t‍(t-s)α-1Tα(t-s)σ(s,X(s-ν(s)))dW(s).
As mentioned in Luo [20], to prove the asymptotic stability it is enough to show that the operator Ψ has a fixed point in H. To prove this result, we use the contraction mapping principle. To apply the contraction mapping principle, first we verify the mean square continuity of Ψ on [0,∞). Let X∈𝔹,t1≥0 and let |h| be sufficiently small, and observe that
(18)E|(ΨX)(t1+h)-(ΨX)(t1)|p≤5p-1∑i=15‍E|Fi(t1+h)-Fi(t1)|p.
Note that
(19)E|F1(t1+h)-F1(t1)|p=E|(Sα(t1+h)-Sα(t1))[φ(0)-g(0,φ)]|p.
The strong continuity of Sα(t) [18] implies that the right hand of (19) goes to 0 as |h|→0. In view of Lemma 5 and the Holder's inequality, the third term of (18) becomes
(20)E|F3(t1+h)-F3(t1)|p=E|∫0t1+h‍(t1+h-s)α-1(-A)Tα(t1+h-s)g×(s,X(s-τ(s)))ds-∫0t1‍(t1-s)α-1(-A)Tα(t1-s)g×(s,X(s-τ(s)))ds∫0t1+h‍|p≤3p-1E|∫t1t1+h‍(t1+h-s)α-1(-A)Tα(t1+h-s)g≤3p-1E×(s,X(s-τ(s)))ds∫t1t1+h‍|p+3p-1E|∫0t1‍[(t1+h-s)α-1-(t1-s)α-1](-A)Tα+3p-1E×(t1+h-s)g(s,X(s-τ(s)))ds∫0t1‍|p+3p-1E|∫0t1‍(t1-s)α-1(-A)+3p-1E×[Tα(t1+h-s)-Tα(t1-s)]g+3p-1E×(s,X(s-τ(s)))ds∫0t1‍|p≤3p-1E(∫t1t1+h‍(t1+h-s)α-1|(-A)1-βTα(t1+h-s)|≤3p-1E×|(-A)βg(s,X(s-τ(s)))|ds∫t1t1+h‍)p+3p-1E(∫0t1‍[(t1+h-s)α-1-(t1-s)α-1]+3p-1E×|(-A)1-βTα(t1+h-s)|+3p-1E×|(-A)βg(s,X(s-τ(s)))|ds∫0t1‍)p+3p-1E(∫0t1‍(t1-s)α-1|(-A)1-β|+3p-1E×|Tα(t1+h-s)-Tα(t1-s)|+3p-1E×|(-A)βg(s,X(s-τ(s)))|ds∫0t1‍)p≤3p-1K(α,β)Mgp(∫t1t1+h‍(t1+h-s)αβ-1ds)p-1×∫t1t1+h‍(t1+h-s)αβ-1E|X(s-τ(s))|pds+3p-1K(α,β)Mgp×(∫0t1‍(t1+h-s)α-1-(t1-s)α-1(t1+h-s)α(β-1)ds)p-1×∫0t1‍(t1+h-s)α-1-(t1-s)α-1(t1+h-s)α(β-1)E|X(s-τ(s))|pds+3p-1ϵpMgp|(-A)1-β|p(∫0t1‍(t1-s)α-1ds)p-1×∫0t1‍(t1-s)α-1E|X(s-τ(s))|pds≤3p-1K(α,β)Mgp(hαβαβ)p-1×∫t1t1+h‍(t1+h-s)αβ-1E|X(s-τ(s))|pds+3p-1K(α,β)Mgp×(∫0t1‍(t1+h-s)α-1-(t1-s)α-1(t1+h-s)α(β-1)ds)p-1×∫0t1‍(t1+h-s)α-1-(t1-s)α-1(t1+h-s)α(β-1)E|X(s-τ(s))|pds+3p-1ϵpMgp|(-A)1-β|p(t1αα)p-1×∫0t1‍(t1-s)α-1E|X(s-τ(s))|pds,
where K(α,β)=αpΓ(1+β)pC1-βp/Γ(1+αβ)p. Since ϵ is sufficiently small, the right hand side of the above equation tends to zero as |h|→0.
Next we consider(21)E|F4(t1+h)-F4(t1)|p=E|∫0t1+h‍(t1+h-s)α-1Tα(t1+h-s)aaaaaaa×f(s,X(s-τ(s)))dsaaaaaaa-∫0t1‍(t1-s)α-1Tα(t1-s)f(s,X(s-τ(s)))ds|p≤3p-1E|∫t1t1+h‍(t1+h-s)α-1Tα(t1+h-s)aaaaaaaaaa×f(s,X(s-τ(s)))ds∫t1t1+h‍|p+3p-1E|∫0t1‍[(t1+h-s)α-1-(t1-s)α-1]+3p-1E×Tα(t1+h-s)f(s,X(s-τ(s)))ds∫0t1‍|p+3p-1E|∫0t1‍(t1-s)α-1[Tα(t1+h-s)-Tα(t1-s)]f+3p-1E×(s,X(s-τ(s)))ds∫0t1‍|p+3p-1E(∫0t1‍[(t1+h-s)α-1-(t1-s)α-1]+3p-1E×|Tα(t1+h-s)||f(s,X(s-τ(s)))|ds∫0t1‍)p+3p-1E(∫0t1‍(t1-s)α-1|Tα(t1+h-s)-Tα(t1-s)|+3p-1Eaa×|f(s,X(s-τ(s)))|ds∫0t1‍)p.
By the Holder’s inequality, we obtain
(22)≤3p-1L1pMpαp(∫t1t1+h‍Mt1+h-s(t1+h-s)α-1ds)p-1×∫t1t1+h‍Mt1+h-s(t1+h-s)α-1E|X(s-τ(s))|pds+3p-1L1pMpαp×(∫0t1‍Mt1+h-s[(t1+h-s)α-1-(t1-s)α-1]ds)p-1×∫0t1‍Mt1+h-s[(t1+h-s)α-1-(t1-s)α-1]E×|X(s-τ(s))|pds+3p-1ϵpL1p(t1αα)p-1×∫0t1‍(t1-s)α-1E|X(s-τ(s))|pds.
Therefore, the right hand side of the above equation tends to zero as |h|→0 and ϵ sufficiently small. Further, we have (23)E|F5(t1+h)-F5(t1)|p=E|∫0t1+h‍(t1+h-s)α-1Tα(t1+h-s)aaaaaaa×σ(s,X(s-τ(s)))dW(s)aaaaaaa-∫0t1‍(t1-s)α-1Tα(t1-s)aaaaaaa×σ(s,X(s-τ(s)))dW(s)∫0t1+h‍|p≤3p-1E|∫t1t1+h‍(t1+h-s)α-1Tα(t1+h-s)aaaaaaaaaa×σ(s,X(s-τ(s)))dW(s)∫t1t1+h‍|p+3p-1E|∫0t1‍[(t1+h-s)α-1-(t1-s)α-1]aaaaaaaaaaa×Tα(t1+h-s)σ(s,X(s-τ(s)))dW(s)∫0t1‍|p+3p-1E|∫0t1‍(t1-s)α-1[Tα(t1+h-s)-Tα(t1-s)]aaaaaaaaaaa×σ(s,X(s-τ(s)))dW(s)∫0t1‍|p≤3p-1CpE(∫t1t1+h‍(t1+h-s)2(α-1)|Tα(t1+h-s)|2aaaaaaaaaaaaa×|σ(s,X(s-τ(s)))|2ds∫t1t1+h‍)p/2+3p-1CpE(∫0t1‍[(t1+h-s)α-1-(t1-s)α-1]2aaaaaaaaaaaaaa×|Tα(t1+h-s)|2aaaaaaaaaaaaaa×|σ(s,X(s-τ(s)))|2ds∫0t1‍)p/2+3p-1CpE(∫0t1‍(t1-s)2(α-1)aaaaaaaaaaaaaa×|Tα(t1+h-s)-Tα(t1-s)|2aaaaaaaaaaaaaa×|σ(s,X(s-τ(s)))|2ds∫0t1‍)p/2≤3p-1CpL1pMpαp×(∫t1t1+h‍(Mt1+h-s(t1+h-s)α-1)p/(p-2)ds)(p-2)/2×∫t1t1+h‍(Mt1+h-s(t1+h-s)α-1)p/2×E|X(s-τ(s))|pds+3p-1CpL1pMpαp×(∫0t1‍(Mt1+h-s[(t1+h-s)α-1aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-(t1-s)α-1])p/(p-2)ds∫0t1‍)(p-2)/2×∫0t1‍(Mt1+h-s[(t1+h-s)α-1-(t1-s)α-1])p/2×E|X(s-τ(s))|pds+3p-1ϵpCpL1p(t1pα-2/p-2pα-2/p-2)(p-2)/2×∫0t1‍(t1-s)p(α-1)/2E|X(s-τ(s))|pds.
As above, the right hand side of the above inequality tends to zero. Similarly, we have F2→0 as h→0. Thus Ψ is continuous in pth moment on [0,∞).
Next we show thatΨ(𝔹)∈𝔹. Let X∈𝔹. From (18), we have(24)E|(ΨX)(t)|p≤6p-1E|Sα(t)φ(0)|p+6p-1E|Sα(t)g(0,φ)|p+6p-1E|g(t,X(t-τ(t)))|p+6p-1E|∫0t‍(t-s)α-1(-A)Tα(t-s)aaaaaaaaaaa×g(s,X(s-τ(s)))ds∫0t‍|p+6p-1E|∫0t‍(t-s)α-1Tα(t-s)f(s,X(s-τ(s)))ds|p+6p-1E|∫0t‍(t-s)α-1Tα(t-s)aaaaaaaaaaa×σ(s,X(s-ν(s)))dW(s)∫0t‍|p.
Now, we estimate the terms on the right hand side of (24) by using the assumptions (H1), (H3), and (H4). Now, we have
(25)6p-1E|Sα(t)φ(0)|p≤6p-1Mp(∫0∞‍ηα(θ)e-αtαθdθ)p|φ|ℬp⟶0ast⟶∞,6p-1E|Sα(t)g(0,φ)|p≤6p-1Mp(∫0∞‍ηα(θ)e-αtαθdθ)p|(-A)-β|pMgp|φ|ℬp⟶0ast⟶∞,6p-1E|g(t,X(t-τ(t)))|p≤6p-1|(-A)-β|pMgpE|X(t-τ(t))|p.
For X(t)∈𝔹 and for any ϵ>0 there exists a t1>0 such that E|X(t-τ(t))|p≤ϵ for t≥t1.
Therefore,(26)6p-1E|g(t,X(t-τ(t)))|p⟶0ast⟶∞.
For the fourth term of (24), we have
(27)6p-1E|∫0t‍(t-s)α-1(-A)Tα(t-s)g(s,X(s-τ(s)))ds|p≤6p-1E(∫0t‍(t-s)α-1|(-A)1-βTα(t-s)|aaaaaaaaaa×|(-A)βg(s,X(s-τ(s)))|ds∫0t‍)p≤6p-1MgpK(α,β)(∫0t‍(t-s)αβ-1ds)p-1×∫0t‍(t-s)αβ-1E|X(s-τ(s))|pds≤6p-1MgpK(α,β)(Tαβαβ)p-1×∫0t‍(t-s)αβ-1E|X(s-τ(s))|pds⟶0ast⟶∞.
Also, we have
(28)6p-1E|∫0t‍(t-s)α-1Tα(t-s)f(s,X(s-τ(s)))ds|p≤6p-1E(∫0t‍(t-s)α-1|Tα(t-s)|aaaaaaaaaaaa×|f(s,X(s-τ(s)))|ds∫0t‍)p≤6p-1αpMpL1p(∫0t‍Mt-s(t-s)α-1ds)p-1×∫0t‍Mt-s(t-s)α-1E|X(s-τ(s)))|pds,6p-1E|∫0t‍(t-s)α-1Tα(t-s)σ(s,X(s-ν(s)))dW(s)|p≤6p-1CpE|∫0t‍(t-s)2(α-1)|Tα(t-s)|2aaaaaaaaaaaaaa×|σ(s,X(s-ν(s)))|2ds∫0t‍|p/2≤6p-1CpL1pαpMp(∫0t‍[Mt-s(t-s)α-1]p/(p-2)ds)p-2/p×∫0t‍Mt-s(t-s)α-1E|X(s-ν(s))|pds.
By the same discussion as above, we have that (28) tends to zero as t→∞. Thus E|ΨX(t)|p→0 as t→∞. We conclude that Ψ(𝔹)∈𝔹.
Finally, we prove thatΨ has a unique fixed point. Indeed, for any X,Y∈𝔹, we have (29)supt∈[0,T]E|(ΨX)(t)-(ΨY)(t)|p≤4p-1supt∈[0,T]E|g(t,X(t-τ(t)))-g(t,Y(t-τ(t)))|p+4p-1supt∈[0,T]E|∫0t‍(t-s)α-1(-A)Tα(t-s)aaaaaaaaaaaaa×[g(s,X(s-τ(s)))aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-g(s,Y(s-τ(s)))]ds∫0t‍|p+4p-1supt∈[0,T]E|∫0t‍(t-s)α-1Tα(t-s)aaaaaaaaaaaaa×[f(s,X(s-τ(s)))aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-f(s,Y(s-τ(s)))]ds∫0t‍|p+4p-1supt∈[0,T]E|∫0t‍(t-s)α-1Tα(t-s)aaaaaaaaaaaaa×[σ(s,X(s-ν(s)))aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-σ(s,Y(s-ν(s)))]dW(s)∫0t‍|p≤4p-1|(-A)-β|pMgpsupt∈[0,T]E|X(t)-Y(t)|p+4p-1supt∈[0,T]E(∫0t‍(t-s)α-1|(-A)1-βTα(t-s)|aaaaaaaaaaaaaa×|(-A)β[g(s,X(s-τ(s)))aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-g(s,Y(s-τ(s)))](-A)β|ds∫0t‍)p+4p-1supt∈[0,T]E(∫0t‍(t-s)α-1|Tα(t-s)|aaaaaaaaaaaaaa×|f(s,X(s-τ(s)))aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-f(s,Y(s-τ(s)))|ds∫0t‍)p+4p-1Cpsupt∈[0,T]E(∫0t‍(t-s)2(α-1)|Tα(t-s)|2aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa×|σ(s,X(s-ν(s)))aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-σ(s,Y(s-ν(s)))|2ds∫0t‍)p/2≤[4p-1|(-A)-β|pMgp+4p-1MgpK(α,β)(Tαβαβ)paaaa+4p-1αpMpL1pLp≤D+4p-1CpαpMpL1pL′p/2(Tαβαβ)p(Tαβαβ)]supt∈[0,T]E|X(t)-Y(t)|p.
Therefore, Ψ is a contradiction mapping and hence there exists a unique fixed point, which is a mild solution of (3) with X(s)=φ(s) on [m(0),0] and E|X(t)|p→0 as t→∞.
To show the asymptotic stability of the mild solution of (3), as the first step, we have to prove the stability in pth moment. Let ϵ>0 be given and choose δ>0 such that δ<ϵ satisfies 6p-1[Mp+Mp|(-A)-β|pMgp]δ+6p-1[|(-A)-β|pMgp+MgpK(α,β)(Tαβ/αβ)p+ αpMpL1pLp+CpαpMpL1pL′p/2]ϵ<ϵ.
IfX(t)=X(t,φ) is mild solution of (3), with |φ|ℬp<δ, then (ΨX)(t)=X(t) satisfies E|X(t)|p<ϵ for every t≥0. Notice that E|X(t)|p<ϵ on t∈[m(0),0]. If there exists t¯ such that E|X(t¯)|p=ϵ and E|X(s)|p<ϵ for s∈[m(0),t¯]. Then (24) show that
(30)E|X(t¯)|p≤6p-1[Mp(ηα(θ)e-αt¯αθ)paaaaaaaaa+Mp(ηα(θ)e-αt¯αθ)p|(-A)-β|pMgp]δ+6p-1[|(-A)-β|pMgp+MgpK(α,β)(Tαβαβ)paaaaaaaaaa+αpMpL1pLp+CpαpMpL1pL′p/2(Tαβαβ)p]ϵ<ϵ
which contradicts the definition of t¯. Therefore, the mild solution of (3) is asymptotically stable in pth moment.In particular, whenp=2 from Theorem 9 we have the following.Theorem 10.
Suppose that the conditions(H1)–(H3) hold. Then, the stochastic fractional differential equations (3) are mean square asymptotically stable if 4Mg2[|(-A)-β|2+V(α,β)(Tαβ/αβ)2]+4α2M2L12[L2+L′]<1, where V(α,β)=α2Γ(1+β)2C1-β2/Γ(1+αβ)2.Wheng≡0,p=2, (3) reduces to
(31)cDtαX(t)=AX(t)+f(t,X(t-τ(t)))+σ(t,X(t-ν(t)))dW(t)dt,t≥0,X0(·)=φ∈ℬℱ([m(0),0],H).
From Theorems 9 and 10, we can easily get the following result.Corollary 11.
Suppose the assumptions(H1) and (H2) hold. Then, the stochastic equations (8) are mean square asymptotically stable if 2α2M2L12[L2+L′]<1.Example 12.
Consider the following stochastic nonlinear fractional partial differential equation with infinite delay in the following form(32)cDtα[u(t,y)+g^(t,u(t-τ,y)]=∂2u(t,y)∂y2+f^(t,u(t-τ,y))+σ^(t,u(t-τ,y))dW(t)dt,u(t,0)=u(t,π)=0,u(t,y)=ϕ(t,y),y∈[0,π],t≤0,
where W(t) denotes a standard cylindrical Wiener process and a standard one-dimensional Brownian motion. To write the system (32) into the abstract form of (3), we consider the space H=K=L2[0,π] and define the operator A:D(A)⊂H→H by Aw=w′′ with domain (33)D(A)={w∈X;w,w′areabsolutelycontinuous,aaw′′∈X,w(0)=w(π)=0},(34)Aw=∑n=1∞‍n2(w,wn)wn,w∈D(A),
where wn(s)=2sin(ns),n=1,2,… is the orthogonal set of eigenvectors in A. It is well known that A generates a compact, analytic semigroup {S(t),t≥0} in X and
(35)S(t)w=∑n=1∞‍e-n2t(w,wn)wn.
It is well known that |S(t)|≤e-π2t. Take p=2. Since M=1, we can get the inequality 4[|(-A)-β|2+V(α,β)(παβ/αβ)2+α2(L2+L′)]<1. Further, if we impose suitable conditions on g^, f^, and σ^ to verify assumptions of Theorem 10, then we can conclude that the mild solution of (32) is mean square asymptotically stable.



---

*Source: 769257-2013-02-26.xml*