# Effect of a Strategically Positioned Methoxy Substituent on the Photochemistry of 3-Aryl-3H-1-Oxacyclopenta[l]Phenanthren-2-Ones

Authors: Roshini K. Thumpakara; Binoy Jose; Perupparampil A. Unnikrishnan; Sreedharan Prathapan; Nigam P. Rath
Journal: Organic Chemistry International
 (2010)

---

## Abstract

Irradiation of 3-methoxy-3-aryl-3H-1-oxacyclopenta[l]phenanthren-2-one derivatives 5a–d resulted in singlet-mediated decarbonylation reaction leading to the formation of phenanthrene derivatives 9a–d. The structure of the photoproduct was unequivocally established on the basis of X-ray crystallographic analysis.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The photochemistry of  unsaturatedγ-lactones such as 2(3H)- and 2(5H)-furanones  (see Scheme 1) is well established [1–8]. Depending on structural features and irradiation conditions, such lactones undergo several phototransformations including decarbonylation [1], decarboxylation [9], solvent addition to the double bond [10], migration of aryl substituents [11], and dimerisation [12]. It has been established that decarbonylation is a singlet-mediated reaction, while aryl group migration, dimerisation, and solvent addition reactions are triplet mediated [13, 14]. Chapman and McIntosh have noted that a critical requirement for clean photochemical cleavage of the acyl-oxygen bond is the presence of a double bond adjacent to the ether oxygen [6]. Stabilization of the incipient oxy radical was considered to be a determining factor in the photocleavage of the bond. While 2(3H)-furanones possessing this structural requirement undergo facile decarbonylation reaction, 2(5H)-furanones are reluctant to undergo decarbonylation. In principle, it should be possible to further enhance the propensity of 2(3H)-furanones to undergo decarbonylation by introducing radical-stabilizing groups at appropriate position on the furanone ring. In this paper, we describe a successful validation of this hypothesis.Scheme 1Though 3,3,5-triarylfuranones1 undergo phototransformations characteristic of 2(3H)-furanones, related phenanthrofuranones such as 2 are reluctant to undergo further phototransformations and hence are occasionally isolated as photostable end products in certain photochemical transformations [3–5]. We reasoned that introduction of a radical-stabilizing methoxy group at the 3-position of phenanthrofuranones as in 3 should enhance their propensity to undergo decarbonylation by stabilization of the putative radical center at the 3-position. This hypothesis has literature precedence. In the case of carbonyl compounds, Wagner has established that γ-alkoxy substituents enhance the rate of γ-hydrogen abstraction (leading to Norrish Type II cleavage) and appropriately positioned alkoxy substituents facilitate rare-δ-hydrogen abstraction reactions [15, 16]. In the present study, we have examined the photochemistry of a few phenanthro-2(3H)-furanones having a methoxy substituent at the 3-position to assess the role of the methoxy substituents in facilitating light-induced acyl-oxygen bond cleavage in phenanthro-2(3H)-furanones. Required phenanthro-2(3H)-furanone derivatives 3 were synthesized by the neat thermolysis of the corresponding phenanthro-2,3-dihydro-2-furanol derivatives 4, which in turn were generated by the condensation of phenanthrenequinone with acetophenones (see Scheme 2) [17].Scheme 2The photolysis (λ=300 nm) of 2(3H)-furanones 5a–d in benzene gave 10-hydroxy-phenanthren-9-yl methanone derivatives 9a–d as yellow crystalline compounds in moderate yields (64%–68%) (Scheme 3). Structures of 9a–d were arrived at on the basis of spectral and analytical data. IR spectrum of 9a–d showed the presence of hydroxyl and carbonyl group in the molecule. 13C NMR spectrum also showed a peak at δ 199 confirming the presence of a carbonyl carbon. The structure of these compounds was unequivocally determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of a representative example such as 9b  (see Figure 1). The unusually low carbonyl stretching frequency observed (1620 cm−1) is attributable to strong intramolecular hydrogen bonding interaction between hydroxyl and carbonyl groups present in the molecule. This was further corroborated by the D–H⋯A distances and angle around H atoms (O1–H1⋯O2 = 1.731 Å, 145.9; O1′–H1′⋯O2′ = 1.745 Å, 148.9) as determined from the X-ray structure. The standard deviation of H-bond donor-acceptor distance was calculated, and it was found to be 0.007. The compound crystallizes in monoclinic space group P21  with two unique molecules in the asymmetric unit. As Z′>1, molecular overlay was used to look for differences in the two unique molecules. The overlay (OFIT, Shelxtl) shows that the phenanthrene rings match very well (weighted RMS deviation = 0.0174). The molecules start to diverge after the carbonyl group (C16–C16′ = 0.143 Å, C19–C19′ = 0.415 Å). The two unique molecules in the asymmetric unit use the methoxy oxygen and an H atom of the phenanthrene ring to form 1-D chain mediated through C–H⋯O contacts. These chains are interconnected to form square-like network (see Figure 2). Each square is formed by two different symmetry-independent molecules, and hence the square is not symmetrical (O3′- - -H11′(x, y-1, z) = 2.465, O3- - -H12 (x, y-1, z) = 2.688, O2′- - -H22b (x, y+1, z) = 2.595, O2—H22d (x, y-1, z) = 2.694 Å, standard deviation of H-bond donor-acceptor distance 0.093).Scheme 3Figure 1
Projection view of the molecule9b with 50% thermal ellipsoids.Figure 2
The square-like network and hydrogen bonding in the crystal lattice of9b.The formation of photoproducts9a–d on irradiation in benzene or acetone can be understood in terms of the pathways shown [6, 13] (see Scheme 3). The initial excitation of the 2(3H)-furanones to the corresponding singlet-excited state resulted in decarbonylation to the diradical intermediate 7 which undergoes bond reorganization to give the quinonemethide intermediate 8. It appears that the methoxy group has a major role to play on the facile decarbonylation of furanones vis-à-vis other phenanthrofuranones such as 2. Hydrolytic elimination of methanol followed by tautomerization will eventually lead to 9. The phototransformation of 5a to 9a is not quenched by ferrocene (ET≈40 Kcal mol−1) indicating a singlet-mediated pathway for the observed transformation. Since the phenanthrenefuranones5a–d absorbed strongly in the 220–400 nm range, it was not feasible to carry out sensitized irradiation of these compounds using common sensitizers.In order to generate further support for the involvement of intermediates such as7 and 8, we attempted to trap them. Our attempts to trap the quinonemethide intermediate 8 by a 4 + 2 cycloaddition reaction with DMAD, however, were not successful. We conclude that the hydrolysis of the vinyl ether component in 8 is much faster than the cycloaddition reaction under the reaction conditions applied by us. A good hydrogen atom donor such as 2-propanol was used to trap radical intermediate 7 by H-transfer. However, trapping experiment using 2-propanol was unsuccessful indicating the reactive nature of 7. Though the proposed intermediates could not be intercepted, the photochemical transformation of 5a–d involving acyl-oxygen bond cleavage appears to be analogous to that of other 2(3H)-furanones [6, 7, 9, 10].In conclusion, we have synthesized several phenanthro-2(3H)-furanone derivatives and examined their photochemistry. We have demonstrated that the methoxy group in the lactone ring has a profound effect on the acyl-oxygen bond cleavage leading to decarbonylation reaction. Our attempts to trap the proposed intermediates by using DMAD and 2-propanol were unsuccessful presumably due to their reactive nature.


## 2. Experimental

All melting points are uncorrected and were determined on a Neolab melting point apparatus. All reactions and chromatographic separations were monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC). Glass plates coated with dried and activated silica gel or aluminium sheets coated with silica gel (Merck) were used for thin layer chromatography. Visualization was achieved by exposure to iodine vapours or UV radiation. Column chromatography was carried out with slurry-packed silica gel (Qualigens, 60–120 mesh). Absorption spectra were recorded using Shimadzu 160A spectrometer, and infrared spectra were recorded using ABB Bomem (MB Series) FT-IR spectrometer. All steady-state irradiations were carried out using Rayonet Photochemical Reactor (RPR) at 300 nm. Solvents for photolysis were purified and distilled before use. The1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 300 and 75 MHz, respectively, on a Bruker 300 FT-NMR spectrometer with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as internal standard. Chemical shifts are reported in parts per million (ppm) downfield of tetramethylsilane. Elemental analysis was performed using Elementar Systeme (Vario ELIII) at STIC, Kochi. Phenanthrenequinone, acetophenones, and ferrocene were purchased from E Merck and were used as obtained.Typical Procedure for the Irradiation Experiment
A benzene solution of5a–d (0.73 mmol in 150 mL) was purged with nitrogen for 20 min and then irradiated for 2 h. Progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC. Solvent was removed, and the residue was chromatographed over silica gel. Elution with a mixture (4 : 1) of hexane and dichloromethane gave 9a–d.9-Hydroxyphenanthren-10-yl(phenyl)methanone (9a)
(68%); mp 136–138°C; IRνmax (KBr) 3428 (OH), 1620 (C=O), and 1600 cm−1; UV λmax (CH3CN) 215 (ε 17,200), 252 (ε 13,000), 296 (ε 7,600), 379 nm (ε 800); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.12–8.59 (m, aromatic and hydroxy protons); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 111.1, 122.6, 122.7, 124.5, 125.2, 126.0, 126.2, 127.2, 127.8, 128.6, 129.5, 130.3, 130.7, 132.5, 134.1, 140.4, 160.8, 199.4; MS, m/z 298 (M+), 239, 220, 165, 105, 77, and other peaks. Anal. Calcd. for C21H14O2: C, 84.54; H, 4.74. Found: C, 84.26; H, 4.81.9-Hydroxyphenanthren-10-yl(4-methoxyphenyl)methanone (9b)
(66%); mp 156-157°C; IRνmax (KBr) 3425 (OH), 1615 (C=O), and 1600 cm−1; UV λmax (CH3CN) 251 (ε 21,000), 293 (ε 9,500), 375 nm (ε 1,500); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 3.86 (3H, s, methoxy), 6.80–8.59 (13H, m, aromatic and hydroxy protons); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 55.0, 104.0, 114.0, 122.4, 122.9, 124.4, 125.0, 126.2, 127.0, 127.6, 128.3, 129.4, 130.3, 132.0, 159.0, 199.9; MS, m/z 328 (M+), 220, 77, and other peaks. Anal. Calcd. for C22H16O3: C, 80.47; H, 4.90. Found: C, 80.18; H, 4.94.


### 2.1. Crystal Data

C22H16O3. M=328.35, monoclinic, space group P21, a=7.2298(3) Å, b=13.7492(7) Å, c=16.0107(8) Å, β=92.621(2)°, U=1589.86(13)Å3, Z=4, DC=1.372 mg m−3, μ=0.091 mm−1, (MoKα, λ=0.71073 Å), T=100(2) K. Of 27486 reflections measured on a Bruker Apex II diffractometer, 7421 were unique (Rint=0.0496). The structure was solved by direct methods and refined on F2 using full matrix refinement. Hydrogen atoms were refined isotropically. R1=0.0450 (F values, I>2σ(I)). wR2=0.0897 (F2 values, all data), goodness-of-fit = 1.023, final difference map extremes +0.219 and −0.222 eA−3. Software: Shelxtl (Sheldrick, 2005).9-Hydroxyphenanthren-10-yl(p-tolyl)methanone (9c)
(64%); mp 140–142°C; IRνmax (KBr), 3418 (OH), 1617 (C=O), and 1600 cm−1; UV λmax (CH3CN) 217 (ε 55,000), 255 (ε 52,000), 302 (ε 8,500), 376 nm (ε 2,100); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.75 (s, 3H, methyl), 6.80–8.59 (m, 15H, aromatic and hydroxy protons); MS, m/z 312 (M+), 220, 163, 91, and other peaks. Anal. Calcd for C27H18O2: C, 80.34; H, 5.39. Found: C, 80.30; H, 5.14.9-Hydroxyphenanthren-10-yl(diphenyl)methanone (9d)
(65%); mp 153–155°C; IRνmax (KBr), 3420 (OH), 1615 (C=O), and 1600 cm−1; UV λmax (CH3CN) 257 (ε 22,000), 275 (ε 10,500), 304 (ε 5,000), 355 nm (ε 2,000); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 6.80–8.59 (m, aromatic and hydroxy protons); MS, m/z 374 (M+), 220, 163, 77, and other peaks. Anal. Calcd. for C27H18O2: C, 86.61; H, 4.85. Found: C, 86.38; H, 5.14.Irradiation of5a in the Presence of Ferrocene
A benzene solution of5a (250 mg, 0.74 mmol in 150 mL) containing ferrocene (120 mg, 0.74 mmol) was purged with nitrogen for 20 min and then irradiated (RPR, 300 nm) for 2 h. Progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC. Solvent was removed, and the residue was charged to a column of silica gel. Elution with a mixture (4 : 1) of hexane and dichloromethane gave 9a (120 mg, 60%).Irradiation of5a in the Presence of Dimethyl Acetylenedicarboxylate (DMAD)
A benzene solution of5a (250 mg, 0.73 mmol in 150 mL) containing DMAD (590 mg, 4.14 mmol) was purged with nitrogen for 20 min and then irradiated (RPR, 350 nm) for 2 h. The reaction was monitored by TLC. Solvent was removed, and the residue was charged to a column of silica gel. Elution with a mixture (4 : 1) of hexane and dichloromethane gave 9a (140 mg, 64%).Irradiation of5a in the presence of 2-propanol
A benzene solution of5a (250 mg, 0.73 mmol in 150 mL) containing 2-propanol (15 mL, 0.20 mmol) was purged with nitrogen for 20 min and then irradiated (RPR, 350 nm) for 2 h. The reaction was monitored by TLC. Solvent was removed and the residue was charged to a column of silica gel. Elution with a mixture (4 : 1) of hexane and dichloromethane gave 9a (140 mg, 64%).


## 2.1. Crystal Data

C22H16O3. M=328.35, monoclinic, space group P21, a=7.2298(3) Å, b=13.7492(7) Å, c=16.0107(8) Å, β=92.621(2)°, U=1589.86(13)Å3, Z=4, DC=1.372 mg m−3, μ=0.091 mm−1, (MoKα, λ=0.71073 Å), T=100(2) K. Of 27486 reflections measured on a Bruker Apex II diffractometer, 7421 were unique (Rint=0.0496). The structure was solved by direct methods and refined on F2 using full matrix refinement. Hydrogen atoms were refined isotropically. R1=0.0450 (F values, I>2σ(I)). wR2=0.0897 (F2 values, all data), goodness-of-fit = 1.023, final difference map extremes +0.219 and −0.222 eA−3. Software: Shelxtl (Sheldrick, 2005).9-Hydroxyphenanthren-10-yl(p-tolyl)methanone (9c)
(64%); mp 140–142°C; IRνmax (KBr), 3418 (OH), 1617 (C=O), and 1600 cm−1; UV λmax (CH3CN) 217 (ε 55,000), 255 (ε 52,000), 302 (ε 8,500), 376 nm (ε 2,100); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.75 (s, 3H, methyl), 6.80–8.59 (m, 15H, aromatic and hydroxy protons); MS, m/z 312 (M+), 220, 163, 91, and other peaks. Anal. Calcd for C27H18O2: C, 80.34; H, 5.39. Found: C, 80.30; H, 5.14.9-Hydroxyphenanthren-10-yl(diphenyl)methanone (9d)
(65%); mp 153–155°C; IRνmax (KBr), 3420 (OH), 1615 (C=O), and 1600 cm−1; UV λmax (CH3CN) 257 (ε 22,000), 275 (ε 10,500), 304 (ε 5,000), 355 nm (ε 2,000); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 6.80–8.59 (m, aromatic and hydroxy protons); MS, m/z 374 (M+), 220, 163, 77, and other peaks. Anal. Calcd. for C27H18O2: C, 86.61; H, 4.85. Found: C, 86.38; H, 5.14.Irradiation of5a in the Presence of Ferrocene
A benzene solution of5a (250 mg, 0.74 mmol in 150 mL) containing ferrocene (120 mg, 0.74 mmol) was purged with nitrogen for 20 min and then irradiated (RPR, 300 nm) for 2 h. Progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC. Solvent was removed, and the residue was charged to a column of silica gel. Elution with a mixture (4 : 1) of hexane and dichloromethane gave 9a (120 mg, 60%).Irradiation of5a in the Presence of Dimethyl Acetylenedicarboxylate (DMAD)
A benzene solution of5a (250 mg, 0.73 mmol in 150 mL) containing DMAD (590 mg, 4.14 mmol) was purged with nitrogen for 20 min and then irradiated (RPR, 350 nm) for 2 h. The reaction was monitored by TLC. Solvent was removed, and the residue was charged to a column of silica gel. Elution with a mixture (4 : 1) of hexane and dichloromethane gave 9a (140 mg, 64%).Irradiation of5a in the presence of 2-propanol
A benzene solution of5a (250 mg, 0.73 mmol in 150 mL) containing 2-propanol (15 mL, 0.20 mmol) was purged with nitrogen for 20 min and then irradiated (RPR, 350 nm) for 2 h. The reaction was monitored by TLC. Solvent was removed and the residue was charged to a column of silica gel. Elution with a mixture (4 : 1) of hexane and dichloromethane gave 9a (140 mg, 64%).



---

*Source: 764185-2010-12-28.xml*