# Investigation of Properties of Silk Fiber Produced in Ethiopia

Authors: Ayano Koyrita Banale
Journal: Journal of Materials
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

The atmospheric conditions and other facilities to rear silk filaments are good in Ethiopia. In Awassa, Awash Melkassa, and Kombolcha silk rearing is started with good progress. The quality of the cocoons produced in the country is not determined in relation to commercial silk produced in major silk producing countries. So far there was no information available about the basic properties of silk filaments produced. In this research paper, the different physical properties of the eri and mulberry cocoon and their filaments were evaluated. Eri cocoons have shell ratio of approximately 14%, average fiber fineness of 3 dtex, and average weight of 3.2–3.3 g, while mulberry cocoons have raw silk ratio of 13-14%, average fiber fineness of 2 dtex, and average weight of 1.5 g. Even though the method of rearing, handling, and harvesting of the cocoons is poor, the physical properties of the silk produced in Ethiopia fall within the limits of commercial silk produced in major silk producing countries.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Silk is very soft, lustrous, smooth, strong, and durable than any natural or artificial fiber. The industrial and commercial uses of silk contributed to the silkworm promotion all over the world especially in developing nations [1].Ethiopia’s bimodal rainfall pattern, ambient temperature, and other agro-ecological factors provide a fertile ground for mulberry and caster seed cultivation and silkworm production [2]. Sericulture development of both eri and mulberry silkworms has been introduced into the country very lately. It was initiated by Melkassa Agricultural Research Centre 20 years ago. However, the technology has been disseminated to beneficiaries since 2001. The SNNP Regional Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Development is the first to promote sericulture technology to the rural poor farmers among all the regions. Subsequently related sectors and interested individuals in and around urban areas of Awassa, Nazareth, Addis Ababa, Debrezeit, and Bahir Dar are involved in the development silk production program [2].According to sericulture training guide report (2005), considerable quantity of dried cocoons, over 3000 kg, was produced both by farmers and investors from which 95% was marketed to Addis. According to Sabahar yearly report, currently the silk production in Ethiopia has increased by almost 200% since 2014. Today, Sabahar, the pioneer of local silk, is the only company in the country which produces textiles made of Ethiopian silk for export. Silk products produced in Ethiopia are organic by nature as the plantation for rearing uses natural fertilizers [2].The favorable conditions of silkworm rearing; rapidly expanding production of silk in the country and the need of organic materials in the world will surely increase the export potential and local utilization of silk. However, so far there are no postcocoon facilities and no information available about the basic properties of silk filaments produced [2–4].Unless basic properties such as silk fineness, cocoon weight, shell ratio, cleanness, and uniformity are known, it will be impossible to market such silk or even to go ahead for further value addition through reeling and weaving. The success of this work largely depends on characterizing its silk cocoon in terms of fiber properties as well as laying a foundation for further processing such as reeling and twisting.In this paper, the different physical properties of the eri and mulberry cocoon and their filament were evaluated. Even though the method of rearing, handling, and harvesting of the cocoons is poor, the physical properties of the silk produced in Ethiopia fall within the limits of commercial cocoons produced in major silk producing countries.


## 2. Materials and Methods

Samples of eri cocoons were collected from Bahir Dar, Awassa, and Awash Melkassa while samples of mulberry cocoons were collected from Awassa and Awash Melkassa. Longitudinal appearance, silk percentage, fiber fineness, moisture regain, cocoon weight, and quality of cocoons were analyzed using ASTM standard method.Longitudinal appearance of the filaments was studied under projection microscope with magnification power of ×125 and ×250 with mounting media of liquid paraffin.Two-pan cooking method was used for reeling by manipulating time and temperature within 45–98°C. Alkali gum removal method was used to degum the filaments. 5% sodium carbonate, 1 : 20 material to liquor ratio, 98°C temperature of cooking, and 2 hours of degumming were used during degumming.Weight of cocoons, shell, and degummed filaments was measured using electronic weighing balance and appropriate proportions were calculated. Broken filaments were taken from outer layer; filaments were degummed and their linear density was measured on vibroscope (fineness testing machine) with appropriate loads of 200 mg–400 mg for eri silk, while for mulberry silk the filament of 25 m length was taken on the outer layer during reeling. Filaments were degummed and weighed. Linear density was calculated.Moisture content of the fiber was analyzed by SDL Rapid Regain Tester and weighing balance. Ten samples, each weighing 10 gm, were prepared from each type and origin. The oven was heated until the temperature rose to 105°C. One sample was inserted in the oven and its weight was measured after 25 minutes. This was done repeatedly till the weight loss is less than 0.05%. This is taken as dried sample and moisture content was measured.Sorting of quality cocoons was made by observation. During observation the quality of dirty/impurities, degree of whiteness, size of the cocoon, and hardness of the cocoon were taken into consideration. Those cocoons with defects and with fewer defects are differentiated.


## 3. Results and Discussions

### 3.1. Shape and Appearance

When fiber is observed under microscope it is smooth in surface and profile, and sometimes nodes appear. The eri filament is more irregular than mulberry silk. Undegummed eri cocoons are grey, while mulberry silk varies from grey to yellow as shown in Figures1 and 2. However, degummed fibers were brighter than the undegummed for both varieties.Figure 1
Cocoons: (a) mulberry and (b) eri.
(a)
(b)Figure 2
Degummed silk filaments: (a) mulberry and (b) eri.
(a)
(b)


### 3.2. Silk Percentage

10 samples, each weighing nearly 200 grams, were prepared; pupa was separated from the cocoons and shell weight was measured for eri cocoons. Mulberry cocoons were degummed after reeling. Average weights of cocoon, shell, and raw silk were taken as shown in Tables1 and 2.Table 1
Shell percentage of eri cocoon.
Sample of eri silk
Cocoon weight (gm)
Shell weight (gm)
Shell percentage (%)
Awash Melkassa
200.8
29.5
14.2
Bahir Dar
200.2
26.8
13.4
Awassa
201.0
27.7
13.7Table 2
Silk percentage of mulberry cocoons.
Sample of cocoon
Cocoon weight (gm)
Weight of filament (gm)
Raw silk percentage (%)
Awash Melkassa
68.3
9.7
14.2%
Awassa
36.4
4.5
12.9%As can be seen from Tables1 and 2 the shell percentage of eri cocoons is approximately 14% for all the places while raw silk percentage of mulberry is bout 13-14%. The raw silk percentage of mulberry from Awash Melkassa is higher than from Awassa.Raw silk ratio varies with breed of silk worms and care taken in rearing and mounting. It also varies with the age of cocoons. The trend observed by K. Subramanianan, N. Sakthivel, and S. M. H. Qadri shows that South Indian eri cocoons shell percentage ranges from 10 to 15% [5]. Raw silk percentage of mulberry is 7–10% for multivoltine cocoons, 11–15% for bivoltine cocoons, 16–19% in newly evolved hybrids, and 19–25% in Japanese reeling cocoons [6–8]. This indicates that the shell percentage of Ethiopian eri cocoons is in the range of good quality South Indian cocoons, while mulberry cocoons silk ratio falls in the range of bivoltine cocoons.


### 3.3. Fiber Fineness

Broken filaments were taken from the outer layer of eri cocoons and linear density was measured on vibroscope after degumming. The filament of 25 m length was taken from outer layer of mulberry cocoons during reeling. Filaments were degummed and weighed. Linear density of the filaments was calculated. The distribution of linear density in dtex is shown in Figures3 and 4.Figure 3
Fiber fineness distribution in dtex of eri silk from Bahir Daar, Awassa, and Awash Melkassa.Figure 4
Fiber fineness distribution in dtex of mulberry silk from Awassa and Awash Melkassa (note: frequency: number of times it has occurred).The fiber fineness distribution of eri and mulberry cocoons of all places is shown in smoothened curves in Figures3 and 4. The mean value of the fiber fineness for eri silk is 3.09 dtex from Bahir Dar, 2.91 dtex from Awassa, and 3.11 dtex from Awash Melkassa with standard deviations of 0.32, 0.29, and 0.25, respectively, while fineness for mulberry silk is 2.1 dtex from Awassa and 2.4 dtex from Awash Melkassa with standard deviations of 0.05 and 0.12, respectively. The eri filament from Awassa is found to be finer as compared to Bahir Dar’s and Awash Melkassa’s filaments. Mulberry filament is finer than eri filaments.Silk worm varieties are many and the filaments they produce are also diverse in characteristics. Even in the same species, the filaments they produce vary because the environmental conditions and the host plant they could use are different. Fineness of silk fiber varies from 1 dtex to 5 dtex depending on type and place of fibers, while eri and mulberry silk takes fineness ranges of 1 dtex to 3 dtex [9–11].


### 3.4. Weight of Cocoon

Sample of cocoons was randomly selected for all types of cocoons. Individual cocoons of the samples selected were weighed on precision weighing balance in grams. The distribution of cocoon weight is given in Figures5 and 6.Figure 5
Distribution of cocoon weight in grams for eri silk fiber from Bahir Dar, Awassa, and Awash Melkassa.Figure 6
Distribution of cocoon weight in grams for mulberry silk fiber from Awassa and Awash Melkassa.Figure5 and 6 indicate that the mean cocoon weight of eri silk is 3.23 g for Bahir Dar, 3.28 g for Awassa, and 3.22 g for Awash Melkassa, while cocoon weight of mulberry silk is 1.55 g for Awassa and 1.52 g for Awash Melkassa. This shows that there is no significant difference in cocoon weight of the same type but eri silk cocoons have higher weight than mulberry cocoons.Cocoon weight of pure breed mulberry varies from 1.5 to 2 g. Eri silk produced in major silk producing countries varies from 2.5 to 3.5 [12–15]. This clearly indicates that the weight of eri cocoons in these places is in the upper limit of the commercial silk produced in major silk producing countries while mulberry silk falls within the pure breeds. Even though the sericulture is not scientifically applied cocoon weight is in the normal range of commercial silk produced in major producing countries.


### 3.5. Moisture Absorption

Cocoons were degummed before moisture analysis. Ten samples of degummed fibers from each type and origin were prepared. Each sample was heated repeatedly in oven dryer till the weight loss is less than a difference of 0.05%. Average value of the regain percentage is given for each type of samples as shown in Table3.Table 3
Percent moisture regain of the various silk types.
Fiber type
Origin
Initial weight (g)
Average final constant weight (g)
% regain
Eri silk
Awassa
10.00
9.05
10.50
Bahir Dar
10.00
9.10
9.93
Awash Melkassa
10.00
9.15
9.79
Mulbery
Awasa
10.00
9.30
8.50
Awash Melkassa
10.00
9.25
9.10The moisture regain at standard conditions of eri silk was approximately 10% while mulberry silk was approximately 9% [16, 17].Mulberry raw silk fiber has a moisture regain of 11%, which reduces to about 9% after degumming (at standard atmospheric conditions, 27°C and 65% RH). This is due to the removal of much hygroscopic sericin from the raw silk fiber during the degumming process. Eri silk fibers have about 10% moisture regain values [18, 19].


### 3.6. Quality of the Cocoons by Sorting

200 gram of cocoon was randomly taken for all types of cocoons. Sorting by manual observation, good quality cocoon and poor quality cocoons were identified. Any defected cocoons, having difference in color, or being smaller in size were considered as poor cocoons. By measuring the sorted samples percentage values were obtained. This was made five times and average values of good and poor quality cocoons were calculated as shown in Table4.Table 4
Percentage of good quality cocoons for the various types of cocoons.
Fiber type
Origin
Good quality cocoons in %
Eri silk
Bahir Dar
52
Awassa
64
Awash Melkassa
60
Mulberry silk
Awassa
68
Awash Melkassa
65As per the guidelines of sorting given, Table4 indicates that more than 60% of the cocoons observed are good.The poor quality cocoons could be due to the weak method of rearing, handling, and harvesting of the cocoons in these harvesting areas. All the places use traditional houses for rearing and simple wooden/timber/frames with corn stalk ribs for rearing stages in uncontrolled conditions. They also do not follow a regular leaves feeding but rather provide leaves to worms irregularly. Feed efficiency affects quality of cocoons produced.


## 3.1. Shape and Appearance

When fiber is observed under microscope it is smooth in surface and profile, and sometimes nodes appear. The eri filament is more irregular than mulberry silk. Undegummed eri cocoons are grey, while mulberry silk varies from grey to yellow as shown in Figures1 and 2. However, degummed fibers were brighter than the undegummed for both varieties.Figure 1
Cocoons: (a) mulberry and (b) eri.
(a)
(b)Figure 2
Degummed silk filaments: (a) mulberry and (b) eri.
(a)
(b)


## 3.2. Silk Percentage

10 samples, each weighing nearly 200 grams, were prepared; pupa was separated from the cocoons and shell weight was measured for eri cocoons. Mulberry cocoons were degummed after reeling. Average weights of cocoon, shell, and raw silk were taken as shown in Tables1 and 2.Table 1
Shell percentage of eri cocoon.
Sample of eri silk
Cocoon weight (gm)
Shell weight (gm)
Shell percentage (%)
Awash Melkassa
200.8
29.5
14.2
Bahir Dar
200.2
26.8
13.4
Awassa
201.0
27.7
13.7Table 2
Silk percentage of mulberry cocoons.
Sample of cocoon
Cocoon weight (gm)
Weight of filament (gm)
Raw silk percentage (%)
Awash Melkassa
68.3
9.7
14.2%
Awassa
36.4
4.5
12.9%As can be seen from Tables1 and 2 the shell percentage of eri cocoons is approximately 14% for all the places while raw silk percentage of mulberry is bout 13-14%. The raw silk percentage of mulberry from Awash Melkassa is higher than from Awassa.Raw silk ratio varies with breed of silk worms and care taken in rearing and mounting. It also varies with the age of cocoons. The trend observed by K. Subramanianan, N. Sakthivel, and S. M. H. Qadri shows that South Indian eri cocoons shell percentage ranges from 10 to 15% [5]. Raw silk percentage of mulberry is 7–10% for multivoltine cocoons, 11–15% for bivoltine cocoons, 16–19% in newly evolved hybrids, and 19–25% in Japanese reeling cocoons [6–8]. This indicates that the shell percentage of Ethiopian eri cocoons is in the range of good quality South Indian cocoons, while mulberry cocoons silk ratio falls in the range of bivoltine cocoons.


## 3.3. Fiber Fineness

Broken filaments were taken from the outer layer of eri cocoons and linear density was measured on vibroscope after degumming. The filament of 25 m length was taken from outer layer of mulberry cocoons during reeling. Filaments were degummed and weighed. Linear density of the filaments was calculated. The distribution of linear density in dtex is shown in Figures3 and 4.Figure 3
Fiber fineness distribution in dtex of eri silk from Bahir Daar, Awassa, and Awash Melkassa.Figure 4
Fiber fineness distribution in dtex of mulberry silk from Awassa and Awash Melkassa (note: frequency: number of times it has occurred).The fiber fineness distribution of eri and mulberry cocoons of all places is shown in smoothened curves in Figures3 and 4. The mean value of the fiber fineness for eri silk is 3.09 dtex from Bahir Dar, 2.91 dtex from Awassa, and 3.11 dtex from Awash Melkassa with standard deviations of 0.32, 0.29, and 0.25, respectively, while fineness for mulberry silk is 2.1 dtex from Awassa and 2.4 dtex from Awash Melkassa with standard deviations of 0.05 and 0.12, respectively. The eri filament from Awassa is found to be finer as compared to Bahir Dar’s and Awash Melkassa’s filaments. Mulberry filament is finer than eri filaments.Silk worm varieties are many and the filaments they produce are also diverse in characteristics. Even in the same species, the filaments they produce vary because the environmental conditions and the host plant they could use are different. Fineness of silk fiber varies from 1 dtex to 5 dtex depending on type and place of fibers, while eri and mulberry silk takes fineness ranges of 1 dtex to 3 dtex [9–11].


## 3.4. Weight of Cocoon

Sample of cocoons was randomly selected for all types of cocoons. Individual cocoons of the samples selected were weighed on precision weighing balance in grams. The distribution of cocoon weight is given in Figures5 and 6.Figure 5
Distribution of cocoon weight in grams for eri silk fiber from Bahir Dar, Awassa, and Awash Melkassa.Figure 6
Distribution of cocoon weight in grams for mulberry silk fiber from Awassa and Awash Melkassa.Figure5 and 6 indicate that the mean cocoon weight of eri silk is 3.23 g for Bahir Dar, 3.28 g for Awassa, and 3.22 g for Awash Melkassa, while cocoon weight of mulberry silk is 1.55 g for Awassa and 1.52 g for Awash Melkassa. This shows that there is no significant difference in cocoon weight of the same type but eri silk cocoons have higher weight than mulberry cocoons.Cocoon weight of pure breed mulberry varies from 1.5 to 2 g. Eri silk produced in major silk producing countries varies from 2.5 to 3.5 [12–15]. This clearly indicates that the weight of eri cocoons in these places is in the upper limit of the commercial silk produced in major silk producing countries while mulberry silk falls within the pure breeds. Even though the sericulture is not scientifically applied cocoon weight is in the normal range of commercial silk produced in major producing countries.


## 3.5. Moisture Absorption

Cocoons were degummed before moisture analysis. Ten samples of degummed fibers from each type and origin were prepared. Each sample was heated repeatedly in oven dryer till the weight loss is less than a difference of 0.05%. Average value of the regain percentage is given for each type of samples as shown in Table3.Table 3
Percent moisture regain of the various silk types.
Fiber type
Origin
Initial weight (g)
Average final constant weight (g)
% regain
Eri silk
Awassa
10.00
9.05
10.50
Bahir Dar
10.00
9.10
9.93
Awash Melkassa
10.00
9.15
9.79
Mulbery
Awasa
10.00
9.30
8.50
Awash Melkassa
10.00
9.25
9.10The moisture regain at standard conditions of eri silk was approximately 10% while mulberry silk was approximately 9% [16, 17].Mulberry raw silk fiber has a moisture regain of 11%, which reduces to about 9% after degumming (at standard atmospheric conditions, 27°C and 65% RH). This is due to the removal of much hygroscopic sericin from the raw silk fiber during the degumming process. Eri silk fibers have about 10% moisture regain values [18, 19].


## 3.6. Quality of the Cocoons by Sorting

200 gram of cocoon was randomly taken for all types of cocoons. Sorting by manual observation, good quality cocoon and poor quality cocoons were identified. Any defected cocoons, having difference in color, or being smaller in size were considered as poor cocoons. By measuring the sorted samples percentage values were obtained. This was made five times and average values of good and poor quality cocoons were calculated as shown in Table4.Table 4
Percentage of good quality cocoons for the various types of cocoons.
Fiber type
Origin
Good quality cocoons in %
Eri silk
Bahir Dar
52
Awassa
64
Awash Melkassa
60
Mulberry silk
Awassa
68
Awash Melkassa
65As per the guidelines of sorting given, Table4 indicates that more than 60% of the cocoons observed are good.The poor quality cocoons could be due to the weak method of rearing, handling, and harvesting of the cocoons in these harvesting areas. All the places use traditional houses for rearing and simple wooden/timber/frames with corn stalk ribs for rearing stages in uncontrolled conditions. They also do not follow a regular leaves feeding but rather provide leaves to worms irregularly. Feed efficiency affects quality of cocoons produced.


## 4. Conclusion

Even though the method of rearing, handling, and harvesting of the cocoons is poor, the quality of cocoons produced in Ethiopia is in the range of commercial silk produced in major silk producing countries. The shell percentage of eri cocoons is nearly 14% for all the places, while raw silk ratio of mulberry is bout 13-14%. The mean value of the fiber fineness for eri silk is 3.09 dtex from Bahir Dar, 2.91 dtex from Awassa, and 3.11 dtex from Awash Melkassa, while fineness for mulberry silk is 2.1 dtex from Awassa and 2.4 dtex from Awash Melkassa. The mean cocoon weight of eri silk is 3.23 g for Bahir Dar, 3.28 g for Awassa, and 3.22 g for Awash Melkassa cocoons while cocoon weight of mulberry silk is 1.55 g for Awassa and 1.52 g for Awash Melkassa cocoons. More than 60% of the cocoons observed are good. If proper rearing and handling of cocoons are used, it is possible to produce higher quality cocoons.



---

*Source: 7691797-2017-05-28.xml*