# An EIRP Measurement Method for Base-Station Antennas Using Field Strengths Measured along a Single Straight Line

Authors: Soon-Soo Oh; Young-Hwan Lee
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

We describe an EIRP measurement technique for a base-station antenna. The proposed method especially can be applied to the base-station antenna installed in real environments. Fresnel region measurement method is an optimal technique to avoid the far-field multipath interference, and, furthermore, it could shorten the measurement time. For detecting only the field strengths along a single straight line, we also propose a simple phase-retrieval method. For verification, a simulation and experiment have been performed. An anechoic chamber was utilized in this paper before the real environment test with the outdoor measurement system. The transformed far-field pattern and EIRP agree closely with the reference data within a valid angle. The proposed method can be applied for the EIRPin situ measurements without moving a vehicle loading the EIRP measurement apparatus.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

As wireless communication services with low power are further developed, protection from high-power radiation devices and facilities such as base-stations and digital broadcasting stations is becoming more important [1–5]. The equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP) is generally used to restrict the amount of radiation power from wireless devices, which is defined as EIRP = Gt×Pt, where Gt is the gain of the transmitting antenna, and Pt is the input power to the transmitting antenna [6–8]. Generally, EIRP measurement is performed before the installation of the base station. However, the communication service provider could violate the upper limit of EIRP, and the inspection after the installation of the base station is required [9].The EIRP measurement of a base-station antenna installed in real environments is a major challenge. First, base-station antenna transmissions invariably suffer from multipath interference when they are measured in the far-field region due to reflections from buildings, the ground, trees, and so forth. The near-field method seems to be a good alternative, but probes placed close to a base-station antenna may disturb communications. Furthermore, planar or cylindrical scanning is required, which results in long scanning and processing times [10–13]. For these reasons, the Fresnel field measurement method [14–17] can be an optimal technique. Second, only magnitude data can be detected, as the base station is in operation and the reference phase cannot be obtained. The phase-retrieval techniques based on the data obtained on the two planar or cylindrical planes have been developed [11–13], but it is difficult to detect the data on two planes in real situations due to the presence of physical obstacles or other base stations [16]. Therefore, the scanning method without moving a vehicle loading the EIRP measurement apparatus is required.In this paper, Fresnel region measurement and a simple phase-retrieval method have been proposed in order to obtain the EIRP of a base-station antenna in a real situation. Only scanning along a single line is required. For verification, the simulated and experimental results of tests performed in an anechoic chamber are described and discussed.


## 2. Theory

The scheme of proposed method is illustrated in Figure1. The base-station antenna is fixed and the probe is moved with separation distance R1.Figure 1
Scheme of the proposed method.As shown in Figure1, the movement trace of the probe is linear. Since the base-station antenna is elongated, the near-field measurement method requires cylindrical scanning. Therefore, Fresnel field measurement method [14–17] is faster than the near-field measurement method. The detected magnitudes are compensated by |ER1,compensated| = |ER1,detected|*(1+ΔR/R1), and this approximation has been proved to be accurate in [15]. In Figure 1, the white circles indicate the detection points while the corresponding compensated fields are marked in red. The differential angle Δβ is the angle between the detection points, which is determined by Δβ=λ/Ly [15], where λ is the wavelength, and Ly is the length in the y-direction of base-station antenna. The number of required data N for one far-field direction is N=Ly2/λR1+1 for moderate accuracy and N=Ly2/λR1+5 for high accuracy [16]. Figure 1 shows the case of N=5.As mentioned in Section1, the detected fields contain only the magnitude, and therefore the phase information must be retrieved. In this paper, a fast and simple phase-retrieval technique is proposed as follows. (I)
Estimate the complex value of the distributionf(x,y) over the artificial aperture. The distribution is based only on the following simple formula:
(1)f(x,y)=cosp1(c1y)+jsinp2(c2y),wherep1, p2, c1, and c2 are the tuning parameters. The base-station antenna is elongated, and thus the distribution along the x-direction is uniform, and only the variation along the y-direction is required. The aperture is subdivided by λ/8 spacing, which has been verified to provide accurate results based on our simulation and experiment.(II)
Calculate the field atR1 using
(2)ER1=∬Sf(x,y)e+jk(xsinα+ycosαsinβ)e-j(π/λR1)(x2+y2)dxdy,whereα is the angle from the y-z plane and β is the angle from the x-z plane.(III)
Compare the calculated magnitude pattern |Ecal| from (2) and the detected pattern |Emeas| in the normalized value. The minimization factor is ∑||Ecal|-|Emeas||2.(IV)
Determine the phase distribution atR1 using (2), if the two patterns agree over the lower level range of about 15 dB. If not, go back to procedure (I) and adjust parameter p, and then process procedures (II) and (III) until the two patterns agree well.Since simple formulas (1) and (2) are utilized, the proposed phase-retrieved technique is fast. One might think that the formula (1) might be inappropriate for other antennas. Practically, however, the preliminary information for a base-station antenna, such as the beam pattern, can be easily obtained since they have already been submitted to the base-station certification agency. Thus, an equation such as (1) can be prechecked, and another simple equation can be built.After estimating the phase, the measured magnitude and retrieved phase atR1 are inserted into (3) [16] and transformed into the value at the far-field region, which results in PR2, as shown in Figure 1,
(3)ER2=R1R2e-jk(R1-R2)∑n=-N+NkmnER1(β+nΔβ),
where kmn is the Fourier coefficient. Now, EIRP is calculated by the Friss transmission formula [10],(4)EIRP=PR2GProbe×(4πR2λ)2,
where Gprobe is the gain of the receiving probe.


## 3. Simulated and Experimental Results

For verification of the proposed method, a simulation was performed with the aid of commercial software, Ansoft's HFSS [18]. A base-station antenna for a Personal Communication Service (PCS) was chosen in the experiment for convenience. The simulation model is illustrated in Figure 2. The frequency was set to 1.8 GHz. A simple rectangular conducting plate with a dimension of 0.15 m × 0.6 m in the x- and y-directions, respectively, was excited by the wave-port model. Since the input power to the antenna was 0 dB and the simulated far-field gain was Gt = 15.44 dBi, the reference EIRP can be calculated as EIRP = Gt+Pt = 15.44 + 0.0 = 15.44 dB.Figure 2
Simulation model of base-station antenna.As shown in Figure2, the radiated fields from the antenna were detected along a straight line with the length of 2.0 m. The separation distance between the base-station antenna and probe is R1 = 0.6 m, which is about 1/8 of the minimum far-field distance. The phase-retrieval technique described in Section 2 was performed. After several iterations of pattern comparison, the final values were p1 = 1.1, c1 = 1.0, p2 = 0.0, and c2 = 0.0.The detected- and retrieved-magnitude fields are plotted in Figure3(a). The retrieved phase is plotted in Figure 3(b). For the comparison, the exact phase along the straight line is also plotted in Figure 3(b). They agreed very well.Fresnel field pattern from the simulation: (a) detected and retrieved magnitudes and the (b) exact and retrieved phases.
(a)
(b)The transformed far-field pattern,PR2, is shown in Figure 4. For comparison, the reference far-field pattern acquired from the far-field simulation is also shown in Figure 4. The normalized patterns agree closely over the range of θ=-20° to +20°. The disagreement outside this range was due to the lack of scanning data [19]. The extrapolation technique expanding the scanned data outside the valid angle could improve the accuracy [19]. The PR2 at θ=0° was 19.52 dB and thus EIRP = 15.18 dB from (4). The difference between the transformed and reference EIRPs was only 0.26 dB.Figure 4
Transformed and reference far-field patterns from the simulation.For the experimental verification, the base-station antenna is installed in a small anechoic chamber, as shown in Figure5. The frequency was set to 1.8 GHz, and the antenna dimensions were 0.15 m × 0.6 m in the x- and y-directions, respectively. The far-field gain of the base-station antenna was measured in a medium-sized anechoic chamber satisfying the far-field criterion, and the resultant gain was Gt = 13.65 dBi. The input power to the base-station antenna was Pt = 6.7 dBm. The exact EIRP from EIRP = Gt×Pt (dB) was thus 20.36 dBm.Figure 5
Photograph of experiment of the base-station antenna in a small anechoic chamber.As shown in Figure5, the field detecting probe was designed with a tapered slot antenna, and the gain was Gprobe = 9.21 dBi. Since this experimental verification was performed in the in-door chamber, the bulky probe is appropriate. However, if one performs in the outdoor environment, a miniature probe would be more appropriate in strong wind conditions.The separation distance between the base-station antenna and probe isR1 = 0.6 m. Meanwhile, the far-field distance of the utilized antenna is larger than 4.7 m. The magnitude field is detected and then compensated as shown in Figure 6(a). Now, the phase-retrieval technique described in Section 2 was performed. After several iterations for parameters in (1), the final values were p1 = 1.0, c1 = 0.8, p2 = 0.0, and c2 = 0.0. The retrieved magnitude is compared to the detected magnitude as shown in Figure 6(a). They almost agreed.Fresnel field pattern from the experiment: (a) detected and retrieved magnitudes and the (b) retrieved phase.
(a)
(b)The retrieved phase is also plotted in Figure6(b). Since the data-acquisition software could detect only the magnitude, the retrieved phase curve as shown in Figure 6(b) cannot be compared with the exact one, but the agreement of simulation results as shown in Figure 3(b) can guarantee the accuracy of the retrieved phase curve.The detected magnitude and retrieved phase were used for the transformation from the Fresnel field atR1 = 0.6 m to the far field at R2 = 4.7 m. The transformed far field pattern, PR2, is shown in Figure 7. For comparison, the far-field pattern acquired in the medium-sized anechoic chamber is also shown in Figure 7. The normalized patterns agreed closely over the range of θ=-20° to +20°. The disagreement outside this range was due to the lack of scanning data caused by the scanning limitations in the y-direction. The transformed PR2 at θ=0° was −22.12 dB, and thus EIRP = 19.66 dBm from (4). The difference between the transformed and reference EIRPs was 0.69 dB. This is a slightly large error. The error from the simulation was only 0.26 dB, and thus we can estimate that this difference includes errors from the noncalibrated probe and mismatched instrument. Furthermore, (4) utilized for EIRP calculation has weakness as similar to the absolute measurement method among the gain measurement method [20], which means that the error of each factor of (4) directly affects the value of EIRP.Figure 7
Transformed and reference far-field patterns from the experiment.For another example, the base-station antenna operating at 859 MHz was experimented in a small anechoic chamber as shown in Figure8(a). The antenna dimensions were 0.3 m × 0.7 m in the x- and y-directions, respectively. The far-field gain of the base-station antenna was Gt = 12.38 dBi, and the input power to the base-station antenna was Pt = −1.08 dBm. Therefore, the exact EIRP was 11.30 dBm. The probe gain was Gprobe = 4.20 dBi at 859 MHz. The separation distance between the base-station antenna and probe is R1 = 0.6 m. The phase-retrieval technique and Fresnel-to-Far transformation were performed, and, finally, the transformed far-field pattern is drawn in Figure 8(b) with the reference far-field pattern. The normalized patterns agreed closely over the valid range of θ=-30° to +30°. The shortage of scanning data also brings the disagreement out of the valid angle. The transformed PR2 at θ=0° was −33.07 dB at R2 = 7.0 m, and thus EIRP = 10.75 dBm from (4). The difference between the transformed and reference EIRPs was 0.55 dB, which proves again the validity of the proposed method in this paper.Another experiment of the base-station antenna operating at 859 MHz (a) Photograph (b) Transformed and reference far-field pattern.
(a)
(b)


## 4. Conclusion

We proposed a practical EIRP measurement technique for a base-station antenna installed in a real environment. A Fresnel region measurement method was chosen to remove multipath interference. A simple phase-retrieval technique provided with priori information is proposed, and thus the data acquisition is required along only a single line without moving a measurement vehicle. For verification of the proposed method, a computer simulation and experiment in a small anechoic chamber have been performed. The transformed far-field pattern and EIRP agreed closely with those of the reference data within a valid angle. Currently, an outdoor measurement system for a base station is being built, and the proposed method in this paper will be adopted. The research on the effect of the probe directivity and the distance between the probe and base-station antenna is also ongoing.



---

*Source: 742636-2013-04-03.xml*