# The Influence of the Motor Traction Vibration on Fatigue Life of the Bogie Frame of the Metro Vehicle

Authors: Qiushi Wang; Jinsong Zhou; Dao Gong; Tengfei Wang; Jiangxue Chen; Taiwen You; Zhanfei Zhang
Journal: Shock and Vibration
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

During the service life of metro vehicles, the cracks frequently appear at the root of motor seats. This indicates the previous antifatigue designs are unable to cover the actual operating environment. Some individual loads, such as motor vibration, have been ignored or wrongly understood, which leads to the occurrence of local insufficient fatigue life of the frame. To illustrate the influence of the motor vibration on the fatigue life of the bogie frame, a metro vehicle was taken as an example: first, the precise finite element model of the frame was established, and its correctness was verified; then, the vibration characteristics of the frame were analyzed by sweep frequency calculation; and finally, considering the vibration acceleration signal of the motor measured on a metro line as the excitation, the influence of the random vibration on the fatigue life of the frame under traction and idle running conditions was compared and analyzed by solving the power spectral density of the dynamic stress response at the weak fatigue nodes of the structure. The results show that the energy of the vibration in the frame is mainly concentrated in modes 6 and 7, which are excited by the motor transverse and vertical vibration, respectively, and contribute a lot to the fatigue damage of the frame; the fatigue life of the vital positions of the frame under the traction condition significantly reduces compared to the idle running condition; and the contribution of the low-amplitude vibration above 300 Hz to the fatigue damage can be ignored. At last, the importance of the influence of the motor traction vibration on the fatigue life should be fully considered in the metro vehicle design was proposed.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

During the operation, metro vehicles were excited by various loads. These loads not only come from track irregularities but also the inside as well, such as traction motor vibration, within a wide frequency range [1–3]. Some studies mentioned that many fatigue cracks appeared around the area near to the traction motor seats during their service life, which was thought to be related to the local elastic vibration [4, 5]. There are only a few research studies about motor vibration fatigue on the metro bogie frame. Some studies show that ① the vertical vibration of the frame suspension traction motor has an evident impact on the frame fatigue strength [6]; ② decoupling optimization of the motor suspension system can effectively improve the vibration isolation to reduce the fatigue damage of the motor seat [7, 8]. The above studies have confirmed the importance of the influence of the motor vibration on the fatigue strength of the frame from the obverse and reverse, but have not been studied in detail.Figure1 shows a complete time-domain signal of the motor acceleration vibration from station A to station B in a city metro line. It can be seen that the metro vehicle has experienced “traction—idle running—brake” conditions successively, and the traction condition includes the starting condition and rated condition. It is worth noting that, in a large number of previous fatigue designs and calculations, the starting condition was often considered as an extraordinary condition, which leads to the influence of the starting condition on the fatigue of the frame which is omitted [9–11]. For this question, EN13749-2005 (Appendix D in [12]) has stated that it is necessary to consider the number of applications of these loads in any fatigue damage analysis [12]. For such frequently started railway vehicles as metro, the ratio of the starting condition to their entire service life is significantly different from the high-speed EMU in the same service mileage. Besides, according to the existing research, high-amplitude loads often contribute a lot to the fatigue damage [13]. However, the starting conditions often cause large-amplitude loads. Therefore, the research on the influence of the motor traction vibration (including starting condition) on the fatigue life of the bogie frame in metro vehicles has practical significance.Figure 1
Vertical acceleration vibration signal of a metro motor from station A to station B.The vibration under the braking condition is not caused by motor traction, so it will not be discussed in this research. Some studies show that the longitudinal vibration of the motor has contributed a little to the fatigue damage of the frame, so the study on the influence of the longitudinal motor vibration will not be performed in this paper [6].The outline of this paper is as follows: first, the modal shape and the main frequency of the frame were calculated by the finite element method (FEM), and the FEM results were compared with the experimental modal analysis (EMA) results to verify the correctness of the model. Then, the dynamic characteristics of the bogie frame were analyzed through sweep frequency calculation. Finally, by fully considering the contribution of the high-frequency vibration to the fatigue damage of the frame, the fatigue life of the bogie frame was calculated separately with the motor vibration under traction and idle running conditions within 1300 Hz.


## 2. Establishment and Verification of the Model

### 2.1. Finite Element Calculation

The finite element model of the metro bogie frame was built by HyperMesh 19.0, as shown in Figure2. The motor seats, gearbox seats, and parts of the midbeam were meshed as three-dimensional solid elements. The side beams, ribs, etc., were meshed as two-dimensional shell elements. The numbers of solid and shell elements are 286,492 and 102,839, and the numbers of nodes for the solid and shell are 63,996 and 101,933. The coordinate system is defined as follows: the forward direction of the vehicle is the X-axis; the Y-axis is parallel with the track plane and perpendicular to the X-axis; and the Z-axis is perpendicular to the track plane. Rigid connections were established between the motor and the motor mounting base, and the completely free modes of the frame without the unconstrained condition were calculated.Figure 2
Finite element model of the bogie frame.According to the modal analysis theory of structure vibration, before the modal verification, the bogie system’s natural modal characteristics need to be solved. The damping ratio is generally 0.01∼0.1 for the bogie frame structure. Therefore, the influence of the damping ratio on the natural frequency can be ignored. The fundamental equation of an undamped free vibration system can be expressed as(1)Mu¨+Ku=0,where [M] represents the mass matrix, [K] represents the stiffness matrix, and {u} represents the displacement vector. Assume that the special solution of formula (1) is as follows:(2)u=φsinωt−t0,where {φ} represents an n-order eigenvector, ω represents the eigenvalue corresponding to {φ}, and t0 represents a constant determined by the initial conditions.Solve (1) by substituting (2), and get analytical solution (3). The calculation results are (ω12, φ1), (ω22, φ2), …, (ωn2, φn). The parameters ω1, ω2, …, ωn represent the eigenvalues of the system. The eigenvectors {φ1}, {φ2}, …, {φn} represent the natural modes of the system:(3)Kφ−ω2Mφ=0.


### 2.2. Experimental Modal Test

The EMA (experimental modal analysis) of the frame was carried out to verify the simulation model’s correctness. The hammering method and SISO test method were used to perform the EMA on the bogie frame. The frame was not equipped with wheelsets, gearboxes, and other components. With suspending by a crane’s hoisting rope, it can be considered as a completely free and unconstrained condition, as shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Experimental modal test for the bogie frame.As shown in Figure4, positions 1 and 7, with the three-direction piezoelectric acceleration sensors stuck here, are the vibration response test points. The hammering points were arranged at the other 30 vital geometric positions of the frame. The signals caused by the medium force hammer were collected through the CPCI box.Figure 4
Layout of test points.


### 2.3. Analysis and Verification

The FEM model (Figure2) was imported into commercial software. The block Lanczos algorithm was used to calculate the modal shape and the main frequency of the bogie frame with the frequency below 100 Hz. The modal shapes are shown in Figure 5, with the theoretical calculation results on the left and the modal test results on the right.Figure 5
Comparison of modal shapes of FEM and EMA results.The MAC function (modal assurance criterion) was used to describe the correlation between theoretical and measured modal shapes, as shown in formula (4). The closer the MAC’s calculated value is to 1, the higher the two modal shapes’ correlation degree is. The calculation results of the correlation are shown in Table 1.(4)MACϕej,ϕfk=ϕejTϕfk2ϕejTϕejϕfkTϕfk,where {φe}j represents the j-th modal shape vector of the finite element analysis results and {φf}k represents the k-th modal shape vector of the experimental modal analysis results.Table 1
Modal analysis of FEM and EMA results.
FEA modal resultTest modal resultError (%)MACModal shapeModal orderFrequency (Hz)Modal orderFrequency (Hz)149.370147.0104.780.96Whole shearing deformation256.066252.6806.040.94Whole twisting deformation364.972360.2937.200.94Side beam bending as “V” type468.662465.6944.320.95Side beam bending as “diamond” type571.291569.6872.250.98Side beam lateral bending on the reverse direction678.885673.0727.370.96Side beam lateral bending in the same direction784.279779.8685.230.95Side beam lateral bending in the same directionAll the relative errors between the FEM results and EMA results for natural frequency corresponding to each mode are less than 7.50% (the maximum error is 7.37%), which can be accepted in engineering, as shown in Table1. Therefore, the accuracy of the finite element model has been verified.


## 2.1. Finite Element Calculation

The finite element model of the metro bogie frame was built by HyperMesh 19.0, as shown in Figure2. The motor seats, gearbox seats, and parts of the midbeam were meshed as three-dimensional solid elements. The side beams, ribs, etc., were meshed as two-dimensional shell elements. The numbers of solid and shell elements are 286,492 and 102,839, and the numbers of nodes for the solid and shell are 63,996 and 101,933. The coordinate system is defined as follows: the forward direction of the vehicle is the X-axis; the Y-axis is parallel with the track plane and perpendicular to the X-axis; and the Z-axis is perpendicular to the track plane. Rigid connections were established between the motor and the motor mounting base, and the completely free modes of the frame without the unconstrained condition were calculated.Figure 2
Finite element model of the bogie frame.According to the modal analysis theory of structure vibration, before the modal verification, the bogie system’s natural modal characteristics need to be solved. The damping ratio is generally 0.01∼0.1 for the bogie frame structure. Therefore, the influence of the damping ratio on the natural frequency can be ignored. The fundamental equation of an undamped free vibration system can be expressed as(1)Mu¨+Ku=0,where [M] represents the mass matrix, [K] represents the stiffness matrix, and {u} represents the displacement vector. Assume that the special solution of formula (1) is as follows:(2)u=φsinωt−t0,where {φ} represents an n-order eigenvector, ω represents the eigenvalue corresponding to {φ}, and t0 represents a constant determined by the initial conditions.Solve (1) by substituting (2), and get analytical solution (3). The calculation results are (ω12, φ1), (ω22, φ2), …, (ωn2, φn). The parameters ω1, ω2, …, ωn represent the eigenvalues of the system. The eigenvectors {φ1}, {φ2}, …, {φn} represent the natural modes of the system:(3)Kφ−ω2Mφ=0.


## 2.2. Experimental Modal Test

The EMA (experimental modal analysis) of the frame was carried out to verify the simulation model’s correctness. The hammering method and SISO test method were used to perform the EMA on the bogie frame. The frame was not equipped with wheelsets, gearboxes, and other components. With suspending by a crane’s hoisting rope, it can be considered as a completely free and unconstrained condition, as shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Experimental modal test for the bogie frame.As shown in Figure4, positions 1 and 7, with the three-direction piezoelectric acceleration sensors stuck here, are the vibration response test points. The hammering points were arranged at the other 30 vital geometric positions of the frame. The signals caused by the medium force hammer were collected through the CPCI box.Figure 4
Layout of test points.


## 2.3. Analysis and Verification

The FEM model (Figure2) was imported into commercial software. The block Lanczos algorithm was used to calculate the modal shape and the main frequency of the bogie frame with the frequency below 100 Hz. The modal shapes are shown in Figure 5, with the theoretical calculation results on the left and the modal test results on the right.Figure 5
Comparison of modal shapes of FEM and EMA results.The MAC function (modal assurance criterion) was used to describe the correlation between theoretical and measured modal shapes, as shown in formula (4). The closer the MAC’s calculated value is to 1, the higher the two modal shapes’ correlation degree is. The calculation results of the correlation are shown in Table 1.(4)MACϕej,ϕfk=ϕejTϕfk2ϕejTϕejϕfkTϕfk,where {φe}j represents the j-th modal shape vector of the finite element analysis results and {φf}k represents the k-th modal shape vector of the experimental modal analysis results.Table 1
Modal analysis of FEM and EMA results.
FEA modal resultTest modal resultError (%)MACModal shapeModal orderFrequency (Hz)Modal orderFrequency (Hz)149.370147.0104.780.96Whole shearing deformation256.066252.6806.040.94Whole twisting deformation364.972360.2937.200.94Side beam bending as “V” type468.662465.6944.320.95Side beam bending as “diamond” type571.291569.6872.250.98Side beam lateral bending on the reverse direction678.885673.0727.370.96Side beam lateral bending in the same direction784.279779.8685.230.95Side beam lateral bending in the same directionAll the relative errors between the FEM results and EMA results for natural frequency corresponding to each mode are less than 7.50% (the maximum error is 7.37%), which can be accepted in engineering, as shown in Table1. Therefore, the accuracy of the finite element model has been verified.


## 3. Random Vibration Analysis

Stress (strain) is always essential data for fatigue assessment and life prediction. There are two kinds of methods to calculate the stress in the bogie frame: static stress method and dynamic stress method. For example, UIC615-4 [14] and EN13749, the standards for fatigue strength design of the bogie frame, are the static stress analysis methods. Although the methods are practical and straightforward, the effect of resonance fatigue has been ignored. The random vibration analysis is the method based on the dynamic stress, mainly including the quasi-static method, time-domain method, and frequency-domain method:①
The quasi-static method is generally used to analyze the engineering problem that the loading frequency is far away from the main frequency of the structure. The dynamic stress response of each key point is obtained by using the quasi-static response coefficient and random load spectrum.②
The time-domain method is based on the input of the time-domain signal of the random load and obtains the dynamic stress response of each point through the mode superposition method or direct integration method. While dealing with a long time-domain signal, the method will spend a lot of running time and cost a lot of storage space. Sometimes, it cannot be even solved out.③
The frequency-domain method is a widely used analysis method. The time-domain signal is transformed into the power spectral density (PSD) in the frequency domain with the Fourier transform. As the input, the PSD for displacement, velocity, or acceleration is used to calculate the dynamic stress response based on the established transfer function.Because of the long time-domain signal of the whole metro line, about 24.5 kilometres, the time-domain method cannot be applied to complete the analysis. Therefore, the frequency-domain method was used in this analysis to solve the dynamic stress response of several nodes of the bogie frame.


### 3.1. Power Spectral Density (PSD) Function

The vibration generated by the operation of metro vehicles can be regarded as a wide-sense stationary random process (WSRP). The autocorrelation functionRqq(τ) of the time-domain signal q(t) depends on the time difference τ = t2 − t1. The autocorrelation function Rqq(τ) is defined as equation (5). Besides, Rqq(τ) and power spectrum density Sqq(ω) are a Fourier-transform pair, defined as equation (6):(5)Rqqτ=∫−∞+∞q1t1q2t2pq1,q2;t1,t2dq1dq2,(6)Sqqω=12π∫−∞+∞Rqqτe−jωτdτ.Through the piezoelectric acceleration sensor (Figure6(a)) and CPCI box (Figure 6(b)), the vertical and lateral acceleration vibration signals of the motor are measured on a metro line. Since the vibration of the motor measured on a metro operation line comes from the traction and idle running conditions together (Figure 1), the motor’s vibration acceleration signals in the traction condition and the idle running condition were selected, respectively. And then, the power spectrum density (PSD) of acceleration obtained by Fourier transform is shown in Figure 7.Figure 6
(a) Motor test point. (b) CPCI box and computer.
(a)(b)Figure 7
(a) Acceleration PSD of the motor (vertical). (b) Acceleration PSD of the motor (horizontal).
(a)(b)Power spectrum density (PSD) function represents the distribution of energy in the frequency domain in a random process [15]. As shown in Figure 7, the main vibration of the motor is the vertical vibration because the amplitude of vertical vibrations is more than ten times of the transverse vibration. The maximum value of the vertical acceleration peak is 5.84 (m/s2)2 under the traction condition. The maximum value of the vertical acceleration peak is 3.22 (m/s2)2 under the idle running condition. It shows that the vibration of the motor under the traction condition is enhanced.Besides, except for the energy distribution within 500 Hz under the traction condition, there are still visible peak signals at the frequency domain of 1000 Hz∼2500 Hz, as shown in Figure7(a). Therefore, the influence of the high-frequency vibration of the motor on the fatigue strength of the frame was considered in this analysis. Because of the limited storage capacity and calculation capacity of the computer, the signals with frequency less than 1300 Hz were intercepted for analysis.


### 3.2. Theoretical Analysis of the Random Vibration

According to the mechanical vibration theory, there are two methods which are used to take acceleration as the input in random vibration analysis: fixed-point excitation method and relative motion method. The fixed-point excitation needs to convert the acceleration into force or torque and then apply it to the structure. However, there is no better method yet to identify the absolute excitation force of a rigidly connected structure.The relative motion method requires applying a full constraint on the load excitation point and applying an acceleration field in the whole system, which is equivalent to the load excitation point which vibrates at the same acceleration of the applied acceleration field in the system.In this paper, the relative motion method (Figure8) was used to analyze the influence of the motor vibration on the frame’s fatigue life. The measured motor acceleration vibration signal was directly used as the input condition, and X, Y, and Z direction constraints were applied on the center of mass of the motor. The other constraints were released at the same time. The theoretical derivation process is as follows.Figure 8
Dynamic model of the relative motion method.The single-degree-of-freedom system is shown in Figure8. Its dynamic differential equation can be written as(7)my¨+cy˙−x˙+ky−x=0,where y represents the absolute displacement of the system response, x represents the displacement of the reference position, and z = y-x represents the relative displacement between them. Equation (7) can be written as equation (8). Therefore, the dynamic differential equation of the multiple degrees of freedom system can be written as equation (9):(8)mz¨+cz˙+kz=−mx¨,(9)Mz¨+Cz˙+Kz=−MEx¨t.According to the mechanical vibration theory, the calculation results of the response of the MDOF system can be expressed as(10)Szzω=H∗SxxωHT.And the spectral matrix relationship between the input and the response can be expressed as equations (11) and (12):(11)Sxzω=SxxωHT,(12)Szxω=H∗Sxxω.However, the solutionz of equation (8) is the relative displacement. The absolute displacement y is the superposition of the relative displacement z and the reference position displacement x, y(t) = z(t) + x(t). The autocorrelation function of absolute displacement y(t) can be easily derived as(13)Ryyτ=EYt⋅Yt+τ=EZt+Xt⋅Zt+τ+Xt+τ=Rzzτ+Rzxτ+Rxzτ+Rxxτ.According to equation (6), the absolute displacement power spectral density of the system can be expressed as(14)Syyω=Szzω+Szxω+Sxzω+Sxxω,where [M], [C], and [K] represent the mass, damping, and stiffness matrices of the system structure, {E} represents the indicating vector of the inertial force, and [H] represents the frequency response function matrix.


### 3.3. Analysis of Vibration Characteristics Based on Sweep Frequency Calculation

The random vibration analysis module of finite element commercial software was used to analyze the frame’s structural vibration characteristics. According to the theory of the relative motion method, the center of mass of the motor is constrained inX, Y, and Z directions, and the unit-amplitude-sine acceleration field in +Y and +Z directions was applied to the system to perform the sweep frequency calculation. The range of the sweep frequency is set at 0∼1300 Hz.Figure9 shows the calculation results of the root mean square (RMS) cloud diagram for the dynamic stress. The three nodes in the most concentrated area of σRMS are selected as the focus nodes: P1 (number 152331), P2 (number 164533), and P3 (number 208674), as shown in Figure 9(b). P1 is located at the motor seat body, σRMS = 136.9 MPa. P2 is located at the root of the motor seat base (at the fillet of the midbeam), σRMS = 108.1 MPa. P3 is located in the middle of the bottom plate of the side beam (at the fillet with the midbeam), σRMS = 79.7 MPa. The above three positions are also consistent with where the actual fatigue cracks have appeared. Therefore, the three nodes are taken as the later research object.Figure 9
(a) RMS stress cloud diagram for the whole bogie frame (MPa). (b) RMS stress cloud diagram for the local part (MPa).
(a)(b)The dynamic stress responses of P1, P2, and P3 within 250 Hz are extracted for analysis, as shown in Figure10. Mode 2 (56.066 Hz) and mode 7 (84.279 Hz) of the frame generate large resonance due to the vertical vibration of the motor. Mode 6 (78.885 Hz) of the frame generates large resonance due to the motor’s transverse vibration. Besides, the closer the node is to the motor, the more resonant modes will occur (number of resonance frequencies: P1 > P2 > P3). This proved that the influence of the motor traction vibration on the frame is local elastic resonance.Figure 10
(a) Dynamic stress response of P1. (b) Dynamic stress response of P2. (c) Dynamic stress response of P3.
(a)(b)(c)


### 3.4. Analysis of the Random Vibration Based on the Measured Signal

Considering the lateral and vertical vibration acceleration signal of the motor measured on a metro line as the excitation (Figure7), the relative motion method was used to solve the dynamic stress power spectral density of the random vibration response of the frame in actual operation. The technical route is as follows:(1)
The center of mass of the motor is constrained inX, Y, and Z directions in the frame finite element model.(2)
The measured acceleration vibration power spectral density of the motor is decomposed. The frequency range is set at 0∼1300 Hz, and the frequency step is set as Δω = 0.1 Hz, ωj = ωmin + j∙Δω (j = 0, 1, 2, …, n).(3)
Several frequency-domain PSD signals which come from Figure7 are taken as the acceleration field in +Y and +Z directions to apply to the frame system at the same time.(4)
The dynamic stress response power spectral density of the nodes is calculated after the modal expansion.The dynamic stress responses of P1, P2, and P3 are extracted, and the double logarithmic spectrum is drawn for analysis, as shown in Figure11. The calculation results’ data are organized, as shown in Table 2. The main frequencies of the key nodes (P1, P2, and P3) under the traction and idle running conditions are the same. The dynamic stress response amplitude of mode 7 and mode 6 of the model is more significant than others (Table 2). The results show that the vibration energy of the frame is mainly concentrated in mode 7 (84.279 Hz) and mode 6 (78.885 Hz), which contribute a lot to the fatigue damage of the frame.Figure 11
(a) PSD of P1 dynamic stress response. (b) PSD of P2 dynamic stress response. (c) PSD of P3 dynamic stress response.
(a)(b)(c)Table 2
The peak and frequency of the dynamic stress response at the key nodes.
FrequencyP1/stress (MPa2∙Hz−1)P2/stress (MPa2∙Hz−1)P3/stress (MPa2∙Hz−1)TractionIdle runningTractionIdle runningTractionIdle running84.2792157.1501479.530578.429396.7523024.3402079.14078.885699.092501.66980.04657.410770.571552.41956.066366.335128.74112.4406.83062.18221.12168.710153.48265.53038.99712.1322.7610.86349.225133.41647.6148.1232.9182.3970.926261.52087.34116.1461.0290.3992.6140.702According to the analysis of vibration characteristics given in Section3.3, mode 7 (84.279 Hz) is excited by the motor’s vertical vibration; mode 6 (78.885 Hz) is excited by the motor’s transverse vibration. Even though the transverse vibration amplitude of the motor is much smaller than the vertical vibration (Figure 7(b)), it still has a high impact on the frame’s dynamic stress response. Therefore, in the fatigue strength design and assessment of the frame, the influence of the transverse vibration of the motor on the fatigue life of the frame should not be ignored.


## 3.1. Power Spectral Density (PSD) Function

The vibration generated by the operation of metro vehicles can be regarded as a wide-sense stationary random process (WSRP). The autocorrelation functionRqq(τ) of the time-domain signal q(t) depends on the time difference τ = t2 − t1. The autocorrelation function Rqq(τ) is defined as equation (5). Besides, Rqq(τ) and power spectrum density Sqq(ω) are a Fourier-transform pair, defined as equation (6):(5)Rqqτ=∫−∞+∞q1t1q2t2pq1,q2;t1,t2dq1dq2,(6)Sqqω=12π∫−∞+∞Rqqτe−jωτdτ.Through the piezoelectric acceleration sensor (Figure6(a)) and CPCI box (Figure 6(b)), the vertical and lateral acceleration vibration signals of the motor are measured on a metro line. Since the vibration of the motor measured on a metro operation line comes from the traction and idle running conditions together (Figure 1), the motor’s vibration acceleration signals in the traction condition and the idle running condition were selected, respectively. And then, the power spectrum density (PSD) of acceleration obtained by Fourier transform is shown in Figure 7.Figure 6
(a) Motor test point. (b) CPCI box and computer.
(a)(b)Figure 7
(a) Acceleration PSD of the motor (vertical). (b) Acceleration PSD of the motor (horizontal).
(a)(b)Power spectrum density (PSD) function represents the distribution of energy in the frequency domain in a random process [15]. As shown in Figure 7, the main vibration of the motor is the vertical vibration because the amplitude of vertical vibrations is more than ten times of the transverse vibration. The maximum value of the vertical acceleration peak is 5.84 (m/s2)2 under the traction condition. The maximum value of the vertical acceleration peak is 3.22 (m/s2)2 under the idle running condition. It shows that the vibration of the motor under the traction condition is enhanced.Besides, except for the energy distribution within 500 Hz under the traction condition, there are still visible peak signals at the frequency domain of 1000 Hz∼2500 Hz, as shown in Figure7(a). Therefore, the influence of the high-frequency vibration of the motor on the fatigue strength of the frame was considered in this analysis. Because of the limited storage capacity and calculation capacity of the computer, the signals with frequency less than 1300 Hz were intercepted for analysis.


## 3.2. Theoretical Analysis of the Random Vibration

According to the mechanical vibration theory, there are two methods which are used to take acceleration as the input in random vibration analysis: fixed-point excitation method and relative motion method. The fixed-point excitation needs to convert the acceleration into force or torque and then apply it to the structure. However, there is no better method yet to identify the absolute excitation force of a rigidly connected structure.The relative motion method requires applying a full constraint on the load excitation point and applying an acceleration field in the whole system, which is equivalent to the load excitation point which vibrates at the same acceleration of the applied acceleration field in the system.In this paper, the relative motion method (Figure8) was used to analyze the influence of the motor vibration on the frame’s fatigue life. The measured motor acceleration vibration signal was directly used as the input condition, and X, Y, and Z direction constraints were applied on the center of mass of the motor. The other constraints were released at the same time. The theoretical derivation process is as follows.Figure 8
Dynamic model of the relative motion method.The single-degree-of-freedom system is shown in Figure8. Its dynamic differential equation can be written as(7)my¨+cy˙−x˙+ky−x=0,where y represents the absolute displacement of the system response, x represents the displacement of the reference position, and z = y-x represents the relative displacement between them. Equation (7) can be written as equation (8). Therefore, the dynamic differential equation of the multiple degrees of freedom system can be written as equation (9):(8)mz¨+cz˙+kz=−mx¨,(9)Mz¨+Cz˙+Kz=−MEx¨t.According to the mechanical vibration theory, the calculation results of the response of the MDOF system can be expressed as(10)Szzω=H∗SxxωHT.And the spectral matrix relationship between the input and the response can be expressed as equations (11) and (12):(11)Sxzω=SxxωHT,(12)Szxω=H∗Sxxω.However, the solutionz of equation (8) is the relative displacement. The absolute displacement y is the superposition of the relative displacement z and the reference position displacement x, y(t) = z(t) + x(t). The autocorrelation function of absolute displacement y(t) can be easily derived as(13)Ryyτ=EYt⋅Yt+τ=EZt+Xt⋅Zt+τ+Xt+τ=Rzzτ+Rzxτ+Rxzτ+Rxxτ.According to equation (6), the absolute displacement power spectral density of the system can be expressed as(14)Syyω=Szzω+Szxω+Sxzω+Sxxω,where [M], [C], and [K] represent the mass, damping, and stiffness matrices of the system structure, {E} represents the indicating vector of the inertial force, and [H] represents the frequency response function matrix.


## 3.3. Analysis of Vibration Characteristics Based on Sweep Frequency Calculation

The random vibration analysis module of finite element commercial software was used to analyze the frame’s structural vibration characteristics. According to the theory of the relative motion method, the center of mass of the motor is constrained inX, Y, and Z directions, and the unit-amplitude-sine acceleration field in +Y and +Z directions was applied to the system to perform the sweep frequency calculation. The range of the sweep frequency is set at 0∼1300 Hz.Figure9 shows the calculation results of the root mean square (RMS) cloud diagram for the dynamic stress. The three nodes in the most concentrated area of σRMS are selected as the focus nodes: P1 (number 152331), P2 (number 164533), and P3 (number 208674), as shown in Figure 9(b). P1 is located at the motor seat body, σRMS = 136.9 MPa. P2 is located at the root of the motor seat base (at the fillet of the midbeam), σRMS = 108.1 MPa. P3 is located in the middle of the bottom plate of the side beam (at the fillet with the midbeam), σRMS = 79.7 MPa. The above three positions are also consistent with where the actual fatigue cracks have appeared. Therefore, the three nodes are taken as the later research object.Figure 9
(a) RMS stress cloud diagram for the whole bogie frame (MPa). (b) RMS stress cloud diagram for the local part (MPa).
(a)(b)The dynamic stress responses of P1, P2, and P3 within 250 Hz are extracted for analysis, as shown in Figure10. Mode 2 (56.066 Hz) and mode 7 (84.279 Hz) of the frame generate large resonance due to the vertical vibration of the motor. Mode 6 (78.885 Hz) of the frame generates large resonance due to the motor’s transverse vibration. Besides, the closer the node is to the motor, the more resonant modes will occur (number of resonance frequencies: P1 > P2 > P3). This proved that the influence of the motor traction vibration on the frame is local elastic resonance.Figure 10
(a) Dynamic stress response of P1. (b) Dynamic stress response of P2. (c) Dynamic stress response of P3.
(a)(b)(c)


## 3.4. Analysis of the Random Vibration Based on the Measured Signal

Considering the lateral and vertical vibration acceleration signal of the motor measured on a metro line as the excitation (Figure7), the relative motion method was used to solve the dynamic stress power spectral density of the random vibration response of the frame in actual operation. The technical route is as follows:(1)
The center of mass of the motor is constrained inX, Y, and Z directions in the frame finite element model.(2)
The measured acceleration vibration power spectral density of the motor is decomposed. The frequency range is set at 0∼1300 Hz, and the frequency step is set as Δω = 0.1 Hz, ωj = ωmin + j∙Δω (j = 0, 1, 2, …, n).(3)
Several frequency-domain PSD signals which come from Figure7 are taken as the acceleration field in +Y and +Z directions to apply to the frame system at the same time.(4)
The dynamic stress response power spectral density of the nodes is calculated after the modal expansion.The dynamic stress responses of P1, P2, and P3 are extracted, and the double logarithmic spectrum is drawn for analysis, as shown in Figure11. The calculation results’ data are organized, as shown in Table 2. The main frequencies of the key nodes (P1, P2, and P3) under the traction and idle running conditions are the same. The dynamic stress response amplitude of mode 7 and mode 6 of the model is more significant than others (Table 2). The results show that the vibration energy of the frame is mainly concentrated in mode 7 (84.279 Hz) and mode 6 (78.885 Hz), which contribute a lot to the fatigue damage of the frame.Figure 11
(a) PSD of P1 dynamic stress response. (b) PSD of P2 dynamic stress response. (c) PSD of P3 dynamic stress response.
(a)(b)(c)Table 2
The peak and frequency of the dynamic stress response at the key nodes.
FrequencyP1/stress (MPa2∙Hz−1)P2/stress (MPa2∙Hz−1)P3/stress (MPa2∙Hz−1)TractionIdle runningTractionIdle runningTractionIdle running84.2792157.1501479.530578.429396.7523024.3402079.14078.885699.092501.66980.04657.410770.571552.41956.066366.335128.74112.4406.83062.18221.12168.710153.48265.53038.99712.1322.7610.86349.225133.41647.6148.1232.9182.3970.926261.52087.34116.1461.0290.3992.6140.702According to the analysis of vibration characteristics given in Section3.3, mode 7 (84.279 Hz) is excited by the motor’s vertical vibration; mode 6 (78.885 Hz) is excited by the motor’s transverse vibration. Even though the transverse vibration amplitude of the motor is much smaller than the vertical vibration (Figure 7(b)), it still has a high impact on the frame’s dynamic stress response. Therefore, in the fatigue strength design and assessment of the frame, the influence of the transverse vibration of the motor on the fatigue life of the frame should not be ignored.


## 4. Fatigue Assessment in the Frequency Domain

The fatigue assessment method based on frequency-domain statistics was used to calculate the vibration fatigue life. Some studies show that Dirlik’s formulation is more reliable than other fatigue calculation methods with broadband signals [16, 17]. Dirlik’s formulation is written as(15)D=EP⋅TC∫0∞SmpSdS,where D represents the cumulative fatigue damage, E[P] represents the expected number of peaks, T (second) represents the test time, C and M represent the parameters of the S-N curve, S represents the stress range level, and p(S) represents the probability density of S (MPa), which can be expressed as follows:(16)pS=D1/Qe−Z/Q+D2⋅Z/R2e−z2/2⋅R2+D3⋅Ze−Z2/22m0,D1=2Xm−γ21+γ2,D2=1−γ−D1+D121−R,D3=1−D1−D2,Z=S2m0,Q=1.25γ−D3−D2RD1,R=γ−Xm−D121−γ−D1+D12,γ=m2m0m4,Xm=m1m0m2m4,EP=m2m4,mn=∫fn⋅Gfdf,where mn (n = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4) represents the moment of area of the PSD and G(f) = 2S(f) represents the value of the single-side PSD at frequency f (Hz).Based on the Palmgren–Miner rule, assume the sum of damage at fatigue failure is 1, and total fatigue lifeTtot can be solved as follows:(17)Ttot=CEP⋅∫0∞SmpSdS.


### 4.1. Comparison of Fatigue Life between Traction and Idle Running Conditions

Extract the dynamic stress responses of P1, P2, and P3 calculated in Section 2.4 (Figure11) and import them into MSC, fatigue software to calculate the fatigue life of the bogie frame. By fully considering the contribution of low-amplitude loads to the fatigue damage, the S-N curve of nominal stress associated with 16MnR steel was extended with a slope of −1/(2m − 1), starting from the point associated with 5 × 107 times cycles.According to the BS7608-2015 welding structure fatigue analysis standard, the S-N curve level was selected as Class-B to set the parameters, as shown in Figure12 [18, 19].Figure 12
S-N curve of 16MnR steel (95% reliability).As the calculation results are shown in Table3, by considering the vibration frequency within 1300 Hz, the fatigue life of key node P1 is 109.523 (seconds) under the idle running condition; the fatigue life of key node P1 is 107.134 (seconds) under the traction condition. Comparing with the idle running condition, the fatigue life of P1, P2, and P3 under the traction condition is lost about 99.31% ((109.523–107.134)/109.523 = 99.59%), 99.66%, and 99.19%, respectively. Therefore, the influence of the motor vibration on the fatigue strength of the metro bogie frame should be fully considered, especially the motor start conditions.Table 3
Comparison of fatigue life under the traction condition and idle running condition.
ConditionP1/time (s)P2/time (s)P3/time (s)Traction107.134107.8981010.012Idle running109.5231010.3651012.102Life loss (%)99.5999.6699.19


### 4.2. Influence of the Vibration with High Frequency and Low Amplitude on Fatigue Damage

It can be seen from Figure7 that there are some vibrations of high frequency with low amplitude around 1000 Hz, which leads to the low amplitude in the dynamic stress power spectral density of P1, P2, and P3, as shown in Figure 11. To investigate the influence of dynamic stress of high frequency and low amplitude on the fatigue damage on the bogie frame, the motor vibration frequency within 300 Hz and 1300 Hz was selected for fatigue life calculation under the traction condition.Finally, the results show that the bogie frame can endure 13,614,398 (s) within 300 Hz and 13,614,444 (s) within 1300 Hz, which is about 46(s) in difference. Because the contribution of the vibration above 300 Hz to the fatigue damage is too low, its effect can be ignored. The fundamental reason is that the stress response amplitude is too small when the frequency is above 300 Hz.


## 4.1. Comparison of Fatigue Life between Traction and Idle Running Conditions

Extract the dynamic stress responses of P1, P2, and P3 calculated in Section 2.4 (Figure11) and import them into MSC, fatigue software to calculate the fatigue life of the bogie frame. By fully considering the contribution of low-amplitude loads to the fatigue damage, the S-N curve of nominal stress associated with 16MnR steel was extended with a slope of −1/(2m − 1), starting from the point associated with 5 × 107 times cycles.According to the BS7608-2015 welding structure fatigue analysis standard, the S-N curve level was selected as Class-B to set the parameters, as shown in Figure12 [18, 19].Figure 12
S-N curve of 16MnR steel (95% reliability).As the calculation results are shown in Table3, by considering the vibration frequency within 1300 Hz, the fatigue life of key node P1 is 109.523 (seconds) under the idle running condition; the fatigue life of key node P1 is 107.134 (seconds) under the traction condition. Comparing with the idle running condition, the fatigue life of P1, P2, and P3 under the traction condition is lost about 99.31% ((109.523–107.134)/109.523 = 99.59%), 99.66%, and 99.19%, respectively. Therefore, the influence of the motor vibration on the fatigue strength of the metro bogie frame should be fully considered, especially the motor start conditions.Table 3
Comparison of fatigue life under the traction condition and idle running condition.
ConditionP1/time (s)P2/time (s)P3/time (s)Traction107.134107.8981010.012Idle running109.5231010.3651012.102Life loss (%)99.5999.6699.19


## 4.2. Influence of the Vibration with High Frequency and Low Amplitude on Fatigue Damage

It can be seen from Figure7 that there are some vibrations of high frequency with low amplitude around 1000 Hz, which leads to the low amplitude in the dynamic stress power spectral density of P1, P2, and P3, as shown in Figure 11. To investigate the influence of dynamic stress of high frequency and low amplitude on the fatigue damage on the bogie frame, the motor vibration frequency within 300 Hz and 1300 Hz was selected for fatigue life calculation under the traction condition.Finally, the results show that the bogie frame can endure 13,614,398 (s) within 300 Hz and 13,614,444 (s) within 1300 Hz, which is about 46(s) in difference. Because the contribution of the vibration above 300 Hz to the fatigue damage is too low, its effect can be ignored. The fundamental reason is that the stress response amplitude is too small when the frequency is above 300 Hz.


## 5. Conclusion

According to the random vibration signal of a motor of the vehicle measured on a metro line, the influence of the traction motor vibration on the fatigue life of the bogie frame was studied.(1)
With the motor’s traction vibration, the weak positions of fatigue strength are located at the motor seat body, the root of the motor seat base (at the fillet of the midbeam), and the middle of the bottom plate of the side beam (from the fillet with the midbeam). The above three positions are consistent with where the actual fatigue damage appeared.(2)
Mode 7 (84.279 Hz) and mode 6 (78.885 Hz) with the higher corresponding stress amplitude contribute a lot to the fatigue damage. Besides, mode 7 is excited by the motor’s vertical vibration; mode 6 is excited by the motor’s transverse vibration.(3)
Compared with the idle running condition, the fatigue life under the traction condition is lost a lot. Therefore, the influence of the motor vibration on the fatigue strength of the metro bogie frame cannot be ignored, especially the motor start conditions. In this case, the contribution of the vibration above 300 Hz to the fatigue damage is too small, and its effect can be ignored.



---

*Source: 7385861-2020-10-23.xml*