# p-Sulfonic Acid Calix[4]arene as an Efficient Catalyst for One-Pot Synthesis of Pharmaceutically Significant Coumarin Derivatives under Solvent-Free Condition

Authors: Hamed Tashakkorian; Moslem Mansour Lakouraj; Mona Rouhi
Journal: International Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

One-pot and efficient protocol for preparation of some potent pharmaceutically valuable coumarin derivatives under solvent-free condition via direct coupling using biologically nontoxic organocatalyst, calix[4]arene tetrasulfonic acid (CSA), was introduced. Calix[4]arene sulfonic acid has been incorporated lately as a magnificent and recyclable organocatalyst for the synthesis of some organic compounds. Nontoxicity, solvent-free conditions, good-to-excellent yields for pharmaceutically significant structures, and especially ease of catalyst recovery make this procedure valuable and environmentally benign.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Finding novel synthetic procedures for a variety of attractive compounds that can be considered as pharmaceutics has been investigated over last decades. The introduction of new methodologies in recent years based on environmentally friendly conditions using efficient and reusable catalyst as well as solvent-free procedures has gained significant attentions among the researchers. Among the thoroughly investigated organic structures, coumarins and their derivatives were highly regarded due to their vast applications in pharmaceutical industries. Coumarins, also recognized as benzopyrones, have revealed characteristics of these potent heterocyclic compounds and proved to feature significant biological activities including antimicrobial, antiviral, antitumor, and antioxidant properties. For instance, monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAO) have antidiabetic activity [1], antiallergic activity [2], anabolic antioxidant, and hepatoprotective activities [3, 4]. These valuable structures, natural or synthetic ones, due to their mentioned characteristics are multipurpose compounds and play variety of roles in our lives. On the other hand, they are being applied to agrochemical [5], food, and cosmetic industries as additives to serve as optical brighteners [6, 7], anticoagulants [8], and laser dyes [9, 10] and they have significant therapeutic roles in pharmaceuticals [11] and treatment of cancer [12]. Experimental surveys exhibit the noteworthy chemotherapeutics activities of these organic structures and they hence have been employed as inhibitors in growth of diverse human tumour cell lines [13].Their known functionalized families have shown variety of antioxidant [14, 15], anti-HIV, anticoagulant, hypotensive, and spasmolytic activities [16–18]. Besides, some potential antibiotic characteristics have been reported for coumarin derivatives such as chartesium, coumermycin, and novobiocin [19]. These valuable compounds also have proved their efficiency as biologically active structures in the formulation of some medicines for a long time [20, 21]. As being natural molecules, coumarins are among the phytochemical compounds that exist in high concentration in tonka bean, apricots, cherries, cinnamon, mullein, strawberries, and some other natural products. However, due to their valuable and impressive characteristics which resulted in being employed in the wide range of products, they became desirable molecules for researchers to find the least harmful and the most efficient preparative procedures. In synthetic chemistry some methods were considered as famous and pioneer methods for preparation of these organic compounds. The first reported procedure for preparation of coumarins was Perkin reaction that was suggested in 1868 [22]. However, Perkin reaction is efficient and suitable just for synthesis of simple coumarins but some alternative methods were developed during the years including Pechmann [23], Knoevenagel [24, 25], Reformatsky [26], Kostanecki-Robinson [27], and Wittig reactions [28, 29]. Although these categories of well known reactions give coumarins in acceptable yields, usually they need severe conditions such as high temperatures, dangerous solvents, long reaction time, and producing byproducts. Excess amounts of harsh acidic activating agents such as POCl3, P2O5, and polyphosphoric acid besides quantitative amount of Lewis acids or sulfuric or sulfonic acids add to their usage drawbacks due to possible severe difficulties such as corrosion problem.So far, different catalyses have been raised to overcome the mentioned drawbacks in the last decade [30–32]. One of the motivating macrocyclic structures with great capacity in different area and that attracted much interest especially in biochemistry is calixarene. Among the interesting compounds derived from this scaffold, sulfonate calixarene has aroused much interest in biopharmaceutical applications [33], due to its promising capabilities in incapsulating; calixarenes increase not only solubility but also bioavailability of valuable pharmaceutical drugs such as nifedipine [34, 35], furosemide [36], niclosamide [37], carbamazepine [38], and topotecan for improving solubility in chemotherapy by host-guest complexes [39]. Surprisingly, medical experiments either of in vivo studies or at the cellular level indicate that the calixarenes have no activity in the Ames test [37]. Moreover, no acute toxicity for the sulfonated calixarenes is reported when specified amounts were injected in mice for in vivo studies. Number of previous organized studies revealed that these multipurpose compounds are not cytotoxic [40]. Calixarenes have very favorable physicochemical properties that are similar to other useful pharmaceutical excipients such as cyclodextrins [41]. Besides the biocompatibility of sulfonated calixarenes, investigation on catalytic activity of this motif in the synthesis of pharmaceutical compounds seems to be interesting. In this regard and in continuation of our recent studies on the development of convenient, effective, and safe protocol in organic and pharmaceutical synthesis [42–45], herein we represent calix[4]arene tetrasulfonic acid, as an efficient and environmentally friendly organocatalyst for the preparation of coumarin derivatives under solvent-free conditions.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Materials and Instruments

The fine chemicals includingp-tert-butylphenol, formaldehyde solution (37%), diphenyl ether, ethylacetate, methanol, and sodium hydroxide were purchased from Merck (Schuchardt, Germany). Ethyl acetoacetate, resorcinol, bisphenols, salicylic acid, 2,5-dihydroxy salicylic acid, phosphorus oxychloride, and silicagel were obtained from Fluka (Switzerland). Parent tert-butylcalixarene was synthesized according to Gutsche procedure published in [51]. Then it was detertiobutylated and sulfonated simultaneously by Shinkai method using concentrated sulfuric acid (Scheme 1) [52]. After further purification described in the literature, the obtained product was applied as a proficient acidic organocatalysis (Figures 1 and 2). Melting points were determined with an Electrothermal 9100 Melting Point Apparatus. IR and 1H NMR spectra were recorded, respectively, on Bruker FTIR Spectrometer and Bruker Avance III 400 MHz NMR Spectrometer. GC-MS analyses were carried out on Shimadzu GC 17A gas chromatograph coupled with MS-QP 5000 Shimadzu Mass Spectrometer (Tokyo, Japan). Elemental analyses were performed by CHN Rapid Heraeus Elemental Analyzer (Wellesley, MA).Scheme 1
Sulfonation of calix[4]arene using Shinkai method.Figure 1
1H NMR spectra of calix[4]arene sulfonic acid in (a) DMSO-d
6 and (b) D2O.
(a)
(b)Figure 2
13C NMR spectrum of calix[4]arene sulfonic acid in D2O.


### 2.2. General Procedure for Preparation of Coumarins

A specified amount of the catalyst, CSA (45 mg, 0.06 mmol), was added to the mixture of ethyl acetoacetate (130 mg, 1 mmol) and phenol derivatives (1 mmol). Then, the The flask was placed in an oil bath and temperature was adjusted to 90°C. After completion of the reaction which was monitored by TLC, it was cooled down to room temperature and then poured onto the crushed ice. After half an hour, reaction mixture was extracted with chloroform three times (3 × 25 mL). Subsequently, the combined organic phase was washed with saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate, brine solution, and water, respectively. Then organic solution was dried using magnesium sulfate and the crude product was obtained using rotary evaporator. For further purification flash column chromatography was performed using petroleum ether/ethylacetate, 90 : 10 (Figure3).Figure 3
Schematic preparation of coumarin.


### 2.3. Coumarin Derivatives Characterization

4-Methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (
1a
). This compound was obtained (24 mg, 15%) and characterized according to the described procedure from Ethyl acetoacetate (130 mg, 1 mmol) and resorcinol (110 mg, 1 mmol).IR (υ
m
a
x/cm−1): 1064, 1238, 1543, 1705, 3020.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), (δ: ppm): δ 2.42 (d, 3H), 6.32 (q, 1H), 7.15–7.42 (m, 3H), 7.48 (d, J
=
6.0 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3), (δ: ppm): 19.1, 116, 117.9, 122, 124.1, 124.6. 132.6, 153, 154.5, 161.6, ESI-MS m
/
z: 160; Anal. Calcd for C10H8O2: C: 75.00, H: 5.00. Found: C: 75.23, H: 5.18.7-Hydroxy-4-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (
2a
). This compound was prepared (167 mg, 95%) and characterized according to the described procedure from Ethyl acetoacetate (130 mg, 1 mmol) and resorcinol (110 mg, 1 mmol).IR (υ
m
a
x/cm−1): 1060, 1227, 1590, 1680, 3150.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), (δ: ppm): 2.35 (d, 3H), 6.11 (q, 1H), 6.69 (d, J
=
2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.78 (dd, J
=
8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (d, J
=
8.8 Hz, 1H), 10.52 (s, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3), (δ: ppm): 18.56, 102.62, 110.70, 112.47, 113.29, 127.05, 153.97, 155.28, 160.74, 161.6. ESI-MS m
/
z: 176; Anal. Calcd for C10H8O3: C: 68.18, H: 4.54. Found: C: 68.45, H: 4.76.6-Hydroxy-4-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (
3a
). This compound was obtained (132 mg, 75%) and identified according to the described procedure from Ethyl acetoacetate (130 mg, 1 mmol) and hydroquinone (110 mg, 1 mmol).IR (υ
m
a
x/cm−1): 1055, 1225, 1565, 1693, 3010, 3412.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), (δ: ppm): 2.42 (d, 3H), 6.33 (q, 1H), 6.73 (d, J
=
8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J
=
8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (s, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3), (δ: ppm): 18.38, 109.40, 114.40, 117.50, 120.65, 121.54, 147.10, 153.93, 155.10, 159.70. ESI-MS m
/
z: 176; Anal. Calcd for C10H8O3: C: 68.18, H: 4.54. Found: C: 68.36, H: 4.88.4,7-Dimethyl-2H-chromen-2-one (
4a
). This compound was prepared (87 mg, 50%) and identified according to the mentioned procedure from Ethyl acetoacetate (130 mg, 1 mmol) and m-cresol (108 mg, 1 mmol).IR (υ
m
a
x/cm−1): 1070, 1146, 1212, 1248, 1378, 1579, 1636, 1704, 2920, 2970.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 2.10 (s, 3H), 2.31 (d, 3H), 4.17 (s, 1H), 6.71–7.29 (m, 3H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 18.04, 24.17, 110.70, 117.43, 118.20, 124.10, 126.50, 144.50, 152.74, 153.92, 162.1. ESI-MS m
/
z: 174; Anal. Calcd for C11H10O2: C: 75.86, H: 5.74. Found: C: 75.52, H: 5.49.7-Methoxy-4-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (
5a
). This compound was obtained (171 mg, 90%) and charectarized according to the mentioned procedure from Ethyl acetoacetate (130 mg, 1 mmol) and m-methoxy phenol (124 mg, 1 mmol).IR (υ
m
a
x/cm−1): 1068, 1284, 1510, 1725, 2927, 3070.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO), δ (ppm): 2.40 (d, 3H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 6.21 (q, 1H), 6.95 (d, 1H), 6.98 (q, 1H), 7.68 (d, J
=
8.4 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO), δ (ppm): 18.60, 56.37, 101.17, 111.58, 112.58, 113.57, 126.93, 153.93, 155.24, 160.63, 162.84. ESI-MS m
/
z: 190; Anal. Calcd for C11H10O3: C: 69.47, H: 5.26. Found: C: 69.76, H: 5.48.7-Amino-4-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (
6a
). This compound was prepared (147 mg, 84%) and identified according to the described procedure from Ethyl acetoacetate (130 mg, 1 mmol) and m-hydroxy aniline (109 mg, 1 mmol).IR (υ
m
a
x/cm−1): 1052, 1238, 1570, 1688, 3012, 3312, 3468.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), (δ: ppm): 2.34 (d, 3H), 6.13 (q, 1H), 6.63 (s, 1H), 6.65 (d, J
=
8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J
=
8.7 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3), (δ: ppm): 19.40, 101.57, 109.40, 111.58, 114.57, 123.46, 153.17, 154.41, 154.63, 161.54. ESI-MS m
/
z: 175; Anal. Calcd for C10H9O2N: C: 68.57, H: 5.14, N: 8.02. Found: C: 68.79, H: 5.36, N: 8.21.7,8-Dihydroxy-4-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (
7a
). This compound was obtained (169 mg, 88%) and identified according to the described procedure from Ethyl acetoacetate (130 mg, 1 mmol) and pyrogallol (126 mg, 1 mmol).IR (υ
m
a
x/cm−1): 629, 807, 1006, 1064, 1186, 1337, 1480, 1524, 1653, 2925, 3217.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO), δ (ppm): 2.35 (d, 3H), 6.12 (q, 1H), 6.80 (d, J
=
8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (d, J
=
8.8 Hz, 1H), 9.67 (s, 1H), 10.04 (s, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO), δ (ppm): 18.72, 110.64, 112.56, 113.21, 115.95, 132.61, 143.74, 149.87, 154.41, 160.68. ESI-MS m
/
z: 192; Anal. Calcd for C10H8O4: C: 62.50, H: 4.17. Found: C: 62.86, H: 4.31.5,7-Dimethoxy-4-methyl-2h-chromen-2-one (
8a
). This compound was obtained (209 mg, 95%) and characterized according to the mentioned procedure from Ethyl acetoacetate (130 mg, 1 mmol) and 3,5-methoxy phenol (154 mg, 1 mmol).IR (υ
m
a
x/cm−1): 1130, 1353, 1460, 1616, 1733, 2939, 2992, 3024.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO), δ (ppm): 2.46 (d, 3H), 3.83 (s, 3H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 5.98 (q, J
=
1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.46 (d, J
=
2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.54 (d, J
=
2.4 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO), δ (ppm): 24.05, 56.31, 56.65, 94.01, 95.99, 104.35, 111.08, 154.63, 156.79, 159.43, 160.15, 163.14. ESI-MS m
/
z: 220; Anal. Calcd for C12H12O4: C: 64.45, H: 5.45. Found: C: 64.22, H: 5.29.4-Methyl-2H-benzo[h]chromen-2-one (
9a
). This compound was prepared (193.2 mg, 92%) and identified according to the mentioned procedure from Ethyl acetoacetate (130 mg, 1 mmol) and α-naphthol (144 mg, 1 mmol).IR (υ
m
a
x/cm−1): 1044, 1275, 1572, 1750, 2922, 3012.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO), δ (ppm): 2.53 (d, 3H), 6.50 (q, 1H), 7.68–7.74 (m, 2H), 7.78 (d, J
=
8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.87 (d, J
=
8.8 Hz, 1H), 8.02–8.06 (m, 1H), 8.34–8.37 (m, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO), δ (ppm): 19.14, 114.34, 115.58, 121.74, 122.10, 122.66, 124.44, 127.86, 128.44, 129.12, 134.83, 150.13, 154.70, 160.13. ESI-MS m
/
z: 210; Anal. Calcd for C14H10O2: C: 80.00, H: 4.76. Found: C: 80.32, H: 4.94.4-Methyl-2H-benzo[f]chromen-2-one (
10a
). This compound was obtained (63 mg, 30%) and identified according to the described procedure from Ethyl acetoacetate (130 mg, 1 mmol) and β-naphtol (144 mg, 1 mmol).IR (υ
m
a
x/cm−1): 1044, 1215, 1514, 1630, 3052.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 2.45 (d, 3H), 6.32 (q, 1H), 7.32–7.60 (m, 4H), 7.9 (d, J
=
9.0 Hz, 1H), 8.54 (d, J
=
9.0 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 24.40, 109.47, 115.70, 117.76, 123.60, 126.35, 126.53, 128.91, 129.84, 134.58, 151.40, 154.96, 160.70. ESI-MS m
/
z: 210; Anal. Calcd for C14H10O2: C: 80.00, H: 4.76. Found: C: 80.45, H: 4.89.4,6,8-Trimethyl-2h-chromen-2-one (
11a
). Reaction of Ethyl acetoacetate (130 mg, 1 mmol) and 2,4-xylenol (122 mg, 1 mmol), according to the described procedure, did not yield the mentioned product.


## 2.1. Materials and Instruments

The fine chemicals includingp-tert-butylphenol, formaldehyde solution (37%), diphenyl ether, ethylacetate, methanol, and sodium hydroxide were purchased from Merck (Schuchardt, Germany). Ethyl acetoacetate, resorcinol, bisphenols, salicylic acid, 2,5-dihydroxy salicylic acid, phosphorus oxychloride, and silicagel were obtained from Fluka (Switzerland). Parent tert-butylcalixarene was synthesized according to Gutsche procedure published in [51]. Then it was detertiobutylated and sulfonated simultaneously by Shinkai method using concentrated sulfuric acid (Scheme 1) [52]. After further purification described in the literature, the obtained product was applied as a proficient acidic organocatalysis (Figures 1 and 2). Melting points were determined with an Electrothermal 9100 Melting Point Apparatus. IR and 1H NMR spectra were recorded, respectively, on Bruker FTIR Spectrometer and Bruker Avance III 400 MHz NMR Spectrometer. GC-MS analyses were carried out on Shimadzu GC 17A gas chromatograph coupled with MS-QP 5000 Shimadzu Mass Spectrometer (Tokyo, Japan). Elemental analyses were performed by CHN Rapid Heraeus Elemental Analyzer (Wellesley, MA).Scheme 1
Sulfonation of calix[4]arene using Shinkai method.Figure 1
1H NMR spectra of calix[4]arene sulfonic acid in (a) DMSO-d
6 and (b) D2O.
(a)
(b)Figure 2
13C NMR spectrum of calix[4]arene sulfonic acid in D2O.


## 2.2. General Procedure for Preparation of Coumarins

A specified amount of the catalyst, CSA (45 mg, 0.06 mmol), was added to the mixture of ethyl acetoacetate (130 mg, 1 mmol) and phenol derivatives (1 mmol). Then, the The flask was placed in an oil bath and temperature was adjusted to 90°C. After completion of the reaction which was monitored by TLC, it was cooled down to room temperature and then poured onto the crushed ice. After half an hour, reaction mixture was extracted with chloroform three times (3 × 25 mL). Subsequently, the combined organic phase was washed with saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate, brine solution, and water, respectively. Then organic solution was dried using magnesium sulfate and the crude product was obtained using rotary evaporator. For further purification flash column chromatography was performed using petroleum ether/ethylacetate, 90 : 10 (Figure3).Figure 3
Schematic preparation of coumarin.


## 2.3. Coumarin Derivatives Characterization

4-Methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (
1a
). This compound was obtained (24 mg, 15%) and characterized according to the described procedure from Ethyl acetoacetate (130 mg, 1 mmol) and resorcinol (110 mg, 1 mmol).IR (υ
m
a
x/cm−1): 1064, 1238, 1543, 1705, 3020.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), (δ: ppm): δ 2.42 (d, 3H), 6.32 (q, 1H), 7.15–7.42 (m, 3H), 7.48 (d, J
=
6.0 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3), (δ: ppm): 19.1, 116, 117.9, 122, 124.1, 124.6. 132.6, 153, 154.5, 161.6, ESI-MS m
/
z: 160; Anal. Calcd for C10H8O2: C: 75.00, H: 5.00. Found: C: 75.23, H: 5.18.7-Hydroxy-4-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (
2a
). This compound was prepared (167 mg, 95%) and characterized according to the described procedure from Ethyl acetoacetate (130 mg, 1 mmol) and resorcinol (110 mg, 1 mmol).IR (υ
m
a
x/cm−1): 1060, 1227, 1590, 1680, 3150.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), (δ: ppm): 2.35 (d, 3H), 6.11 (q, 1H), 6.69 (d, J
=
2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.78 (dd, J
=
8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (d, J
=
8.8 Hz, 1H), 10.52 (s, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3), (δ: ppm): 18.56, 102.62, 110.70, 112.47, 113.29, 127.05, 153.97, 155.28, 160.74, 161.6. ESI-MS m
/
z: 176; Anal. Calcd for C10H8O3: C: 68.18, H: 4.54. Found: C: 68.45, H: 4.76.6-Hydroxy-4-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (
3a
). This compound was obtained (132 mg, 75%) and identified according to the described procedure from Ethyl acetoacetate (130 mg, 1 mmol) and hydroquinone (110 mg, 1 mmol).IR (υ
m
a
x/cm−1): 1055, 1225, 1565, 1693, 3010, 3412.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), (δ: ppm): 2.42 (d, 3H), 6.33 (q, 1H), 6.73 (d, J
=
8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J
=
8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (s, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3), (δ: ppm): 18.38, 109.40, 114.40, 117.50, 120.65, 121.54, 147.10, 153.93, 155.10, 159.70. ESI-MS m
/
z: 176; Anal. Calcd for C10H8O3: C: 68.18, H: 4.54. Found: C: 68.36, H: 4.88.4,7-Dimethyl-2H-chromen-2-one (
4a
). This compound was prepared (87 mg, 50%) and identified according to the mentioned procedure from Ethyl acetoacetate (130 mg, 1 mmol) and m-cresol (108 mg, 1 mmol).IR (υ
m
a
x/cm−1): 1070, 1146, 1212, 1248, 1378, 1579, 1636, 1704, 2920, 2970.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 2.10 (s, 3H), 2.31 (d, 3H), 4.17 (s, 1H), 6.71–7.29 (m, 3H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 18.04, 24.17, 110.70, 117.43, 118.20, 124.10, 126.50, 144.50, 152.74, 153.92, 162.1. ESI-MS m
/
z: 174; Anal. Calcd for C11H10O2: C: 75.86, H: 5.74. Found: C: 75.52, H: 5.49.7-Methoxy-4-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (
5a
). This compound was obtained (171 mg, 90%) and charectarized according to the mentioned procedure from Ethyl acetoacetate (130 mg, 1 mmol) and m-methoxy phenol (124 mg, 1 mmol).IR (υ
m
a
x/cm−1): 1068, 1284, 1510, 1725, 2927, 3070.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO), δ (ppm): 2.40 (d, 3H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 6.21 (q, 1H), 6.95 (d, 1H), 6.98 (q, 1H), 7.68 (d, J
=
8.4 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO), δ (ppm): 18.60, 56.37, 101.17, 111.58, 112.58, 113.57, 126.93, 153.93, 155.24, 160.63, 162.84. ESI-MS m
/
z: 190; Anal. Calcd for C11H10O3: C: 69.47, H: 5.26. Found: C: 69.76, H: 5.48.7-Amino-4-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (
6a
). This compound was prepared (147 mg, 84%) and identified according to the described procedure from Ethyl acetoacetate (130 mg, 1 mmol) and m-hydroxy aniline (109 mg, 1 mmol).IR (υ
m
a
x/cm−1): 1052, 1238, 1570, 1688, 3012, 3312, 3468.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), (δ: ppm): 2.34 (d, 3H), 6.13 (q, 1H), 6.63 (s, 1H), 6.65 (d, J
=
8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J
=
8.7 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3), (δ: ppm): 19.40, 101.57, 109.40, 111.58, 114.57, 123.46, 153.17, 154.41, 154.63, 161.54. ESI-MS m
/
z: 175; Anal. Calcd for C10H9O2N: C: 68.57, H: 5.14, N: 8.02. Found: C: 68.79, H: 5.36, N: 8.21.7,8-Dihydroxy-4-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (
7a
). This compound was obtained (169 mg, 88%) and identified according to the described procedure from Ethyl acetoacetate (130 mg, 1 mmol) and pyrogallol (126 mg, 1 mmol).IR (υ
m
a
x/cm−1): 629, 807, 1006, 1064, 1186, 1337, 1480, 1524, 1653, 2925, 3217.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO), δ (ppm): 2.35 (d, 3H), 6.12 (q, 1H), 6.80 (d, J
=
8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (d, J
=
8.8 Hz, 1H), 9.67 (s, 1H), 10.04 (s, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO), δ (ppm): 18.72, 110.64, 112.56, 113.21, 115.95, 132.61, 143.74, 149.87, 154.41, 160.68. ESI-MS m
/
z: 192; Anal. Calcd for C10H8O4: C: 62.50, H: 4.17. Found: C: 62.86, H: 4.31.5,7-Dimethoxy-4-methyl-2h-chromen-2-one (
8a
). This compound was obtained (209 mg, 95%) and characterized according to the mentioned procedure from Ethyl acetoacetate (130 mg, 1 mmol) and 3,5-methoxy phenol (154 mg, 1 mmol).IR (υ
m
a
x/cm−1): 1130, 1353, 1460, 1616, 1733, 2939, 2992, 3024.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO), δ (ppm): 2.46 (d, 3H), 3.83 (s, 3H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 5.98 (q, J
=
1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.46 (d, J
=
2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.54 (d, J
=
2.4 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO), δ (ppm): 24.05, 56.31, 56.65, 94.01, 95.99, 104.35, 111.08, 154.63, 156.79, 159.43, 160.15, 163.14. ESI-MS m
/
z: 220; Anal. Calcd for C12H12O4: C: 64.45, H: 5.45. Found: C: 64.22, H: 5.29.4-Methyl-2H-benzo[h]chromen-2-one (
9a
). This compound was prepared (193.2 mg, 92%) and identified according to the mentioned procedure from Ethyl acetoacetate (130 mg, 1 mmol) and α-naphthol (144 mg, 1 mmol).IR (υ
m
a
x/cm−1): 1044, 1275, 1572, 1750, 2922, 3012.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO), δ (ppm): 2.53 (d, 3H), 6.50 (q, 1H), 7.68–7.74 (m, 2H), 7.78 (d, J
=
8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.87 (d, J
=
8.8 Hz, 1H), 8.02–8.06 (m, 1H), 8.34–8.37 (m, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO), δ (ppm): 19.14, 114.34, 115.58, 121.74, 122.10, 122.66, 124.44, 127.86, 128.44, 129.12, 134.83, 150.13, 154.70, 160.13. ESI-MS m
/
z: 210; Anal. Calcd for C14H10O2: C: 80.00, H: 4.76. Found: C: 80.32, H: 4.94.4-Methyl-2H-benzo[f]chromen-2-one (
10a
). This compound was obtained (63 mg, 30%) and identified according to the described procedure from Ethyl acetoacetate (130 mg, 1 mmol) and β-naphtol (144 mg, 1 mmol).IR (υ
m
a
x/cm−1): 1044, 1215, 1514, 1630, 3052.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 2.45 (d, 3H), 6.32 (q, 1H), 7.32–7.60 (m, 4H), 7.9 (d, J
=
9.0 Hz, 1H), 8.54 (d, J
=
9.0 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 24.40, 109.47, 115.70, 117.76, 123.60, 126.35, 126.53, 128.91, 129.84, 134.58, 151.40, 154.96, 160.70. ESI-MS m
/
z: 210; Anal. Calcd for C14H10O2: C: 80.00, H: 4.76. Found: C: 80.45, H: 4.89.4,6,8-Trimethyl-2h-chromen-2-one (
11a
). Reaction of Ethyl acetoacetate (130 mg, 1 mmol) and 2,4-xylenol (122 mg, 1 mmol), according to the described procedure, did not yield the mentioned product.


## 3. Result and Discussion

Due to environmental concerns, in the last decade a variety of catalysts has been introduced in organic synthesis; among them are organocatalysts which have shown recyclability and nontoxicity as well as efficiency in producing key products. One of the most interesting supramolecular organic structures that have played so many roles in different areas especially in chemistry is calixarene and its derivatives.In the recent years, calix[4]arene tetrasulfonic acid as an organic catalyst has shown considerable capability in organic reactions and has been used as a novel efficient acidic organocatalyst in esterification [53, 54], Mannich type reaction [55, 56], and synthesis of xanthones, dixanthones [57], and bis(indolyl)methanes [58]. In this paper we aimed to report a green recognized procedure for the one-pot construction of coumarin derivatives using nonhazardous and recyclable organocatalyst, calix[4]arene sulfonic acid, under solvent-free condition. To survey the applicability of the catalyst for synthesis of pharmaceutically interesting compounds, a variety of coumarins were prepared via direct coupling of phenols and ethylacetoacetate ester in the presence of a catalytic amount (0.06 mmol) of the organocatalyst (Scheme 2).Scheme 2
General procedure for preparation of coumarin derivatives with a variety of phenols using calix[4]arene sulfonic acid.The product structures and their corresponding melting points are shown in Table1. As can be seen, the results clearly indicated good-to-high yields for coumarin derivatives except three compounds which were obtained in small quantities. To produce coumarin derivatives, mechanism of the reaction proceeds similarly to previously prepared xanthone derivatives through direct in situ cyclization of intermediates [57]. Exploring the outcome of the cyclization reaction between phenols and Ethyl acetoacetate as well as overall yields pointed out that some functional groups on phenolic substrate accelerate the ring closure and promote the product yields obviously.Table 1
Coumarins prepared from tetrasulfonic acid calixarene via Pechmann reaction.
Substrate
Product
Time (h)
Yield (%)
M. P. (found)
M. P. (obtained)
1
1a
24
15
79–81 [46]
78-79
2
2a
2.5
95
182–184 [47]
183–185
3
3a
4
75
241-242 [46]
240–242
4
4a
2.5
50
130-131 [48]
132
8
5a
2
90
158–160 [47]
158-159
6
6a
2.5
84
220–224 [49]
222–224
7
7a
2.5
88
234-235 [47]
232–234
8
8a
1.5
95
—
173–175
9
9a
4
92
153–155 [47]
151–154
10
10a
10
30
182-183 [50]
180-181
11
11a
24
—
—
—
M. P.: melting point.As can be deduced from Table1, enhancing the electron density will cause higher yields. Yields were promoted by the presence of electron releasing groups such as amino, hydroxyl, and methoxy groups (5a–9a). As was expected, phenols with electron donating groups such as hydroxy and methoxy activate the phenolic moieties to react faster with Ethyl acetoacetate, and consequently the products were obtained in higher yields and shorter times.To find the best condition and optimize the reaction conditions especially from the environmental point of view, performing some experiments for possible modification on the reaction was necessary. So, we studied the reaction parameters including solvent, amount of catalyst, and reaction temperature. Reaction of resorcinol and Ethyl acetoacetate (2a) was considered as a typical reaction and the reaction parameters were changed and the yields were monitored consequently. At first, reaction medium was investigated using polar and nonpolar solvents such as tetrahydrofuran (THF), dichloromethane (DCM), n-hexane, acetonitrile, and solvent-free condition. Temperature and amount of catalyst were unchanged through the reactions. The result indicated that solvent-free condition gave the higher amount of the product in shorter periods (Table 2). However, in addition to higher yields, employing solvent-free protocol reduces the environmental pollutions and hazardous organic solvents. To reach the optimum catalytic activity of the catalyst, the different amounts of the catalyst were evaluated with some try-outs. So, according to Table 2, some experiments were done and the minimum amount of the catalyst with the acceptable result was considered as the most favorable amount of the catalyst. Determination of the optimum reaction temperature, which is critical for energy consumption issues, was conducted with some experiments in the range of 25 to 120°C. Results indicate that higher temperatures are needed to provide sufficient energy for nucleophilic attack by phenolic rings and consequently ring closure. Temperatures above 90°C have shown excellent results in the least time (Table 2).Table 2
Optimization of the reaction medium for the synthesis of 4-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (1)a.
Entry
Catalyst (mg)
Solvent
Temp. (°C)
Time (h)
Yield (%)b
1
25
THF
80
5
60
2
25
CH3CN
80
5
67
3
25
CH2Cl2
80
12
30
4
25
n-Hexane
80
12
20
5
25
Solvent-free
80
3
78
6
15
Solvent-free
80
5
50
7
25
Solvent-free
80
3
78
8
45
Solvent-free
80
3
88
9
60
Solvent-free
80
2.5
90
10
45
Solvent-free
r.t
24
30
11
45
Solvent-free
50
10
60
12
45
Solvent-free
80
3
88
13
45
Solvent-free
90
2.5
95
14
45
Solvent-free
120
2.5
96
aReaction condition: resorcinol (1 mmol) with Ethyl acetoacetate (1 mmol), p-sulfonic acid calix[4]arene.
bIsolated yield.To explore the potential applicability of this notable organocatalyst in catalytic organic reactions especially in producing fine chemicals as well as to cover industrial concern in reducing the chemical pollutants in an environment, reusability of the catalyst has been practiced and the results were acceptable. Hence, after each reaction, catalyst was recovered by washing the precipitate with specified amounts of deionized water to dissolve the organocatalyst. Then, on filtration, aqueous solution of catalyst was evaporated, dried, and adjusted for in further successive reactions. The results showed that the recycled catalyst was still as efficient as the fresh one even after four runs of usage, and decreases in product yields are negligible, Figure4.Figure 4
Efficiency of the calixarene sulfonic acid (CSA) in the synthesis of coumarins.


## 4. Conclusions

In this research, potential applicability ofp-sulfonic acid calix[4]arene (CSA) as a catalyst in the synthesis of pharmaceutically significant coumarin derivatives was evaluated. Efficient catalytic activity as well as recyclability makes CSA an exciting organocatalyst for researchers who are searching for more environmentally friendly catalysts with less harmful and more proficient capabilities. Moreover, herein, the earlier strategies in the synthesis of coumarin derivatives were developed using CSA as a catalyst in one-pot and solvent-free procedure. In this study we demonstrated especial and valuable organocatalyst for the synthesis of coumarins.



---

*Source: 738202-2015-12-20.xml*