# Chemical Composition of Corrosion Products of Rebar Caused by Carbonation and Chloride

Authors: Jundi Geng; Junzhe Liu; Jiali Yan; Mingfang Ba; Zhimin He; Yushun Li
Journal: International Journal of Corrosion
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

The microstructures of steel bars were studied by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and the mechanism of corrosion of steel bars under the corrosion factors was elucidated. The results show that the passivation film and corrosive surface of the steel surface in the solution of the chloride-containing salt were coarser and the surface state was denser. The main corrosion products are FeOOH and FeO. The surface of the steel immersed in the simulated carbonized solution had loose pores. The main components are FeOOH, Fe3O4, and Fe2O3. The surface of the steel bar has a large amount of yellowish brown corrosion products in the simulated carbonization and chloride salt. The surface of the corrosion products was stripped and the main components are FeOOH, Fe3O4, and FeCl3, where the content of FeOOH is as high as 60%. The peak value of iron is gradually increased from the simulated chloride salt solution to the carbonized solution to the combined effect of carbonation and chloride salt; the iron oxide content is increased and corrosion of steel is obviously serious.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Chloride salt and carbonization are the main causes of steel corrosion, as evidenced by the failure of a large number of reinforced concrete structures as well as a large number of concrete works under double factor of carbon dioxide and chloride ion [1–4]. In general, the steel surface of the passive film in the steel is stable  due to the presence of overbased concrete pore solution. When the outside carbon dioxide and chloride ions infiltrated into the concrete, the pH of the pore solution decreased and chloride content increased, leading to the destruction of the passive film corrosion [5–9]. Therefore, the main barrier to prevent corrosion of steel is the passive film.There are many factors affecting the destruction of passivation film, including the surface conditions of steel bars, alloy composition, iron phase composition, and other material factors as well as the permeability of concrete, the concentration of chloride ion, the PH of solution, temperature and humidity, and other environmental factors [10–12]. The properties of the steel passivation film, that is, the thickness, composition, and stability, are influenced by the polarization potential, the polarization time, and the ion concentration in the medium, and the microstructure characteristics of passivation films are related to passivation potential and passivation time. The reason for the corrosion of steel is finally due to the change of the composition and structure of passivation film [13–16]. It can be seen that there is an urgent need to clarify the failure process of passivation film under carbonation and chloride corrosion and clarify the damage mechanism of passivation film of steel reinforcement under the action of corrosion factor so as to improve the obtuse environment on the surface of rebar in concrete [17].Ghods used X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to study the passive oxide film of carbon steel in saturated calcium hydroxide solution and the effect of chloride on the film properties showing that chloride exposure decreased the thickness of the oxide films and changed their stoichiometry such that near the film/substrate interface Fe3+/Fe2+ ratio increased.In this paper, the key factors influencing the passive film structure of the surface of rebar in concrete are taken as the starting points, and the composition and microstructure characteristics of the corrosion on the surface of the rebar are studied under the action of carbonation and chloride corrosion so as to provide the theoretical basis to improve the corrosion resistance of steel through optimizing the composition of the steel surface oxide layer.


## 2. Experiment

### 2.1. Materials and Specimen Preparation

The 10 mm diameter steel bars are cut into 2 mm steel thin section, which are polished with 400-mesh, 500-mesh, and 800-mesh sandpaper, wiped clean with 95% alcohol, and placed in a desiccator for rusting X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis. Three simulated concrete pore solution environments were used. Table1 shows the composition of the precarbonized concrete pore solution and the simulated carbonated concrete pore solution. Test was divided into three groups’ preparation: (1) 3% sodium chloride is mixed with the concrete hole solution to simulate the chloride salt corrosion environment; (2) pore solution is carbonized to simulate a carbonized corrosive environment; (3) carbonation hole solution was performed by adding 3% sodium chloride to simulate the carbonation and chloride salt composite corrosion environment [18].Table 1
The ratio of simulated concrete pore solution.
Species
Uncarbonized simulated pore solution
Carbonized simulated pore solution
Reagents
Ca(OH)2
NaOH
KOH
Na2CO3
NaHCO3
Mol/L
0.001
0.2
0.6
0.0015
0.03Pour 300 ml of the three prepared simulated concrete hole solutions into three covered glass flasks, placing two steel thin sections in each of the glass flasks and tightening the cap. After six months, the steel thin section was removed from the solution, rinsed with deionized water and acetone, and then blown dry with argon and stored in an Ar-filled container. The samples were determined by X-ray diffraction analysis and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy within two hours.


### 2.2. Instruments

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS). XPS used Mg target, X-ray emission current of 20 mA, high-voltage X-ray source 10 kV, doubler voltage 2.8 kV, full spectrum energy 100 eV, and semispectral energy 50 eV. Scan was performed 20 times; each step time was l0 ms. Ar+ was sputtered 5 s before each test starting so as to remove the effects of surface contaminants. The sputtering speed of Ar+ is about 3 nm/min. The data was subjected to fractional fitting analysis using CasaXPS 2.3.16 after XPS testing at 0 nm and 5 nm. The peak curves for all elements are calibrated with C1s, with a binding energy of 284.6 ev.X-Ray Diffractometer (XRD),.D8 Advance Davinci from Bruker, Germany, was used. Using Cu and Kα1 ray, the tube voltage is 40 Kv; the tube current is 40 mA. Continuous scanning was performed with a scan range of 20° to 70°, a scan rate of 8°/min, and a step size of 0.02°.


## 2.1. Materials and Specimen Preparation

The 10 mm diameter steel bars are cut into 2 mm steel thin section, which are polished with 400-mesh, 500-mesh, and 800-mesh sandpaper, wiped clean with 95% alcohol, and placed in a desiccator for rusting X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis. Three simulated concrete pore solution environments were used. Table1 shows the composition of the precarbonized concrete pore solution and the simulated carbonated concrete pore solution. Test was divided into three groups’ preparation: (1) 3% sodium chloride is mixed with the concrete hole solution to simulate the chloride salt corrosion environment; (2) pore solution is carbonized to simulate a carbonized corrosive environment; (3) carbonation hole solution was performed by adding 3% sodium chloride to simulate the carbonation and chloride salt composite corrosion environment [18].Table 1
The ratio of simulated concrete pore solution.
Species
Uncarbonized simulated pore solution
Carbonized simulated pore solution
Reagents
Ca(OH)2
NaOH
KOH
Na2CO3
NaHCO3
Mol/L
0.001
0.2
0.6
0.0015
0.03Pour 300 ml of the three prepared simulated concrete hole solutions into three covered glass flasks, placing two steel thin sections in each of the glass flasks and tightening the cap. After six months, the steel thin section was removed from the solution, rinsed with deionized water and acetone, and then blown dry with argon and stored in an Ar-filled container. The samples were determined by X-ray diffraction analysis and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy within two hours.


## 2.2. Instruments

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS). XPS used Mg target, X-ray emission current of 20 mA, high-voltage X-ray source 10 kV, doubler voltage 2.8 kV, full spectrum energy 100 eV, and semispectral energy 50 eV. Scan was performed 20 times; each step time was l0 ms. Ar+ was sputtered 5 s before each test starting so as to remove the effects of surface contaminants. The sputtering speed of Ar+ is about 3 nm/min. The data was subjected to fractional fitting analysis using CasaXPS 2.3.16 after XPS testing at 0 nm and 5 nm. The peak curves for all elements are calibrated with C1s, with a binding energy of 284.6 ev.X-Ray Diffractometer (XRD),.D8 Advance Davinci from Bruker, Germany, was used. Using Cu and Kα1 ray, the tube voltage is 40 Kv; the tube current is 40 mA. Continuous scanning was performed with a scan range of 20° to 70°, a scan rate of 8°/min, and a step size of 0.02°.


## 3. Analysis and Discussion

### 3.1. XPS Analysis of Steel Corrosion Products

Figure1 shows the XPS full scan spectra of steel bar corroded after 6 months of immersion in various simulated corrosion hole solutions. The main components of steel bar corroded in the hole solution are iron, oxygen, carbon, and chlorine. Among them, oxygen, carbon, and iron peak are strong, indicating that the chemical composition of corrosion is mainly iron oxide.Figure 1
XPS full scanning diagrams of reinforcement corrosion in simulated solutions.
(a)
Chloride salt solution
(b)
Carbonized pore solution
(c)
Carbonization and chloride salt composite pore solutionThere is no carbon peak in the simulated chloride salt solution, while the peak of carbon in Figure1(a) is very strong. On the one hand, carbon comes from the steel itself and on the other hand it comes from the dissolution of carbon dioxide during the test. The Fe 2p binding energy of steel corroded in the simulated chloride salt solution was 709.96 ev, the Fe 2p binding energy of the steel corroded in the simulated carbonation solution was 710.76 ev, and the binding energy of Fe 2p in the simulated carbonation and chloride salt solution was 711.30 ev. This shows that in these three solutions the components of steel corrosion are iron oxide, but the specific composition is different. From simulated chloride salt solution to simulated carbonation solution and then to the simulated carbonization and chloride salt composite solution, the peak value of Fe in steel corrosion products gradually increases, indicating that the content of iron oxide gradually increases and the corrosion of steel reinforcement becomes more serious. The Fe 2p orbital has a bimodal structure due to the splitting of the spin into two energy levels (i.e., Fe 2p 1/2 and Fe 2p 3/2). The corrosive iron compounds can be divided into four classes of Fe-1, Fe-2, Fe-3, and Fe-4, corresponding to elemental Fe, Fe3O4/FeO (Fe2+), Fe2O3/FeOOH (Fe3+), and FeCl3 (Fe3+). The XPS peak fitting of the Fe element of the steel bar corroded after immersing the steel bar in different simulated hole solution for 6 months is shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
XPS scanning diagrams of Fe element in simulated solutions.
(a)
Chloride salt solution
(b)
Carbonized pore solution
(c)
Carbonization and chloride salt composite pore solutionThe peak curves of Fe 2p in the simulated corrosion of chloride salt solution fit four peak curves, and the corresponding compounds are FeO and FeOOH, respectively. By fitting, it can be concluded that the binding energy of the peak position and curve peak area of Fe element in corrosion solution of steel bar in chloride salt solution are shown in Table2, the relative content of FeO is 32.3%, and the relative content of FeOOH is 67.7%.Table 2
XPS scanning data of Fe element in the simulate chloride salt solution.
Ingredient
Energy level of Fe 2p
Binding energy of peak position
Half width
Peak area
Relative content
FeO
Fe 2p3/2
709.4 ev
2.71
2037.3
32.3%
Fe 2p1/2
723 ev
2.71
1024.3
Fe 2p3/2
715.4 ev
3.9
893.8
Fe 2p1/2
729 ev
3.9
449.2
FeOOH
Fe 2p3/2
711.9 ev
2.4
6215
67.7%
Fe 2p1/2
725.5 ev
2.4
3125
Fe 2p3/2
719.9 ev
3.14
196.9
Fe 2p1/2
733.5 ev
3.14
99The peak curves of Fe 2p in the simulated carbonation solution fit three peak curves, and the corresponding compounds are Fe3O4 and FeOOH, respectively. By fitting, it can be concluded that the binding energy of the peak position and curve peak area of Fe element in corrosion solution of steel bar in chloride salt solution are shown in Table 3, the relative content of Fe3O4 is 39.9%, and the relative content of FeOOH is 60.1%.Table 3
XPS scanning data of Fe element in the simulate carbonized solution.
Ingredient
Energy level of Fe 2p
Binding energy of peak position
Half width
Peak area
Relative content
Fe3O4
Fe 2p3/2
710.8 ev
2.3
825.7
39.9%
Fe 2p1/2
724.4 ev
2.3
920.6
FeOOH
Fe 2p3/2
711.5 ev
2.4
1120.1
60.1%
Fe 2p1/2
725.1 ev
2.4
206.6
Fe 2p3/2
719.5 ev
3.14
1336.9
Fe 2p1/2
733.1 ev
3.14
206.6The peak curves of Fe 2p in carbonization and chloride salt composite pore solution fit five peak curves, and the corresponding compounds are Fe3O4, FeOOH, and FeCl3, respectively. By fitting, it can be concluded that the binding energy of the peak position and curve peak area of Fe element in corrosion solution of steel bar in chloride salt solution are shown in Table 4, the relative content of Fe3O4 is 19.3%, the relative content of FeOOH is 69.1%, and the relative content of FeCl3 is 11.6%.Table 4
XPS scanning data of Fe in the combined effect of carbonation and chloride salt.
Ingredient
Energy level of Fe 2p
Binding energy of peak position
Half width
Peak area
Relative content
Fe3O4
Fe 2p3/2
710.8 ev
2.3
906.7
19.3%
Fe 2p1/2
724.4 ev
2.3
305.1
FeOOH
Fe 2p3/2
711.5 ev
2.4
2230.6
69.1%
Fe 2p1/2
725.1 ev
2.4
312.3
Fe 2p3/2
719.5 ev
3.14
2323.1
Fe 2p1/2
733.1 ev
3.14
343.1
FeCl3
Fe 2p3/2
713.9 ev
2.7
409.9
11.6%
Fe 2p1/2
727.5 ev
2.7
102.4
Fe 2p3/2
721.9 ev
3.2
468.4
Fe 2p1/2
735.5 ev
3.2
130.3


### 3.2. XRD Analysis of Corroded Steel

Reinforced corroded surface with 5000 times magnification of the scanning electron microscope (SEM) and corresponding corrosive X-ray diffraction spectrum (XRD) after immersing for 6 months in the chloride salt simulated pore solution is shown in Figure3(a). Most of the surface of the reinforced concrete in the simulated chloride salt solution is not corroded, and the surface is relatively flat and locally convex, indicating that part of the surface is covered with corrosives and the corrosion layer is a thin layer. The steel surface enlarged 5K times and holes were found in some places, indicating the passivation film of the reinforcing steel in the simulated concrete pore solution is slowly penetrated by chloride ions and begins to corrode. Analysis by JADE6.5 software shows that there are two clear main peaks at 44.6° and 64.9° in 2θ of steel of chloride salt solution. The results show that there are many noncorroded areas in the simulated salt solution of chloride salt. Compared with other standard cards, it is found that the corrosion products in this solution are mainly FeOOH and FeO, which is consistent with the results of the previous XPS analysis.Figure 3
Morphology and composition of corroded surface of steel bar.
(a)
Chloride salt solution
(b)
Carbonized pore solution
(c)
Carbonization and chloride salt composite pore solutionReinforced corroded surface with 5000 times magnification of the scanning electron microscope (SEM) and corresponding corrosive X-ray diffraction spectrum (XRD) after immersing for 6 months in the simulation of carbide pore solution is shown in Figure3(b). Steel surface generated a yellow-black rust, but the surface is relatively smooth, with no rust protrusions. The steel surface enlarged 5K times and it was found that reinforced steel surface has been corroded and loose porous, with stick shape, and there are three clear main peaks at 36.8°, 44.7°, and 65.1° in 2θ of steel. Compared with the XRD standard card, the main diffraction peak of Fe3O4 was found, and the diffraction peak of the simple Fe was not found. Compared with Figure 3(a), there were other minor peaks. This shows that the surface of the rebar immersed in the simulation of carbide pore solution has been completely corroded with the formation of FeOOH and Fe2O3, which is a good supplement to XPS analysis.Reinforced corroded surface with 5000 times magnification of the scanning electron microscope (SEM) and corresponding corrosive X-ray diffraction spectrum (XRD) after immersing for 6 months in carbonation and chloride salt composite pore solution is shown in Figure3(c). The corroded steel bars are brown in color and are in the shape of a layer with uneven thickness distribution and spalling phenomenon. The peak value of the corrosion products is conspicuous with respect to Figures 3(a) and 3(b). The main diffraction peak compared with the standard card shows FeOOH, subpeak was found in FeCl3 and Fe3O4 in the corrosion, and the intensity has been enhanced. This shows that the corrosion of reinforcing steel is more serious under the condition of chloride salt and carbonized composite, which is consistent with the result of XPS analysis.


## 3.1. XPS Analysis of Steel Corrosion Products

Figure1 shows the XPS full scan spectra of steel bar corroded after 6 months of immersion in various simulated corrosion hole solutions. The main components of steel bar corroded in the hole solution are iron, oxygen, carbon, and chlorine. Among them, oxygen, carbon, and iron peak are strong, indicating that the chemical composition of corrosion is mainly iron oxide.Figure 1
XPS full scanning diagrams of reinforcement corrosion in simulated solutions.
(a)
Chloride salt solution
(b)
Carbonized pore solution
(c)
Carbonization and chloride salt composite pore solutionThere is no carbon peak in the simulated chloride salt solution, while the peak of carbon in Figure1(a) is very strong. On the one hand, carbon comes from the steel itself and on the other hand it comes from the dissolution of carbon dioxide during the test. The Fe 2p binding energy of steel corroded in the simulated chloride salt solution was 709.96 ev, the Fe 2p binding energy of the steel corroded in the simulated carbonation solution was 710.76 ev, and the binding energy of Fe 2p in the simulated carbonation and chloride salt solution was 711.30 ev. This shows that in these three solutions the components of steel corrosion are iron oxide, but the specific composition is different. From simulated chloride salt solution to simulated carbonation solution and then to the simulated carbonization and chloride salt composite solution, the peak value of Fe in steel corrosion products gradually increases, indicating that the content of iron oxide gradually increases and the corrosion of steel reinforcement becomes more serious. The Fe 2p orbital has a bimodal structure due to the splitting of the spin into two energy levels (i.e., Fe 2p 1/2 and Fe 2p 3/2). The corrosive iron compounds can be divided into four classes of Fe-1, Fe-2, Fe-3, and Fe-4, corresponding to elemental Fe, Fe3O4/FeO (Fe2+), Fe2O3/FeOOH (Fe3+), and FeCl3 (Fe3+). The XPS peak fitting of the Fe element of the steel bar corroded after immersing the steel bar in different simulated hole solution for 6 months is shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
XPS scanning diagrams of Fe element in simulated solutions.
(a)
Chloride salt solution
(b)
Carbonized pore solution
(c)
Carbonization and chloride salt composite pore solutionThe peak curves of Fe 2p in the simulated corrosion of chloride salt solution fit four peak curves, and the corresponding compounds are FeO and FeOOH, respectively. By fitting, it can be concluded that the binding energy of the peak position and curve peak area of Fe element in corrosion solution of steel bar in chloride salt solution are shown in Table2, the relative content of FeO is 32.3%, and the relative content of FeOOH is 67.7%.Table 2
XPS scanning data of Fe element in the simulate chloride salt solution.
Ingredient
Energy level of Fe 2p
Binding energy of peak position
Half width
Peak area
Relative content
FeO
Fe 2p3/2
709.4 ev
2.71
2037.3
32.3%
Fe 2p1/2
723 ev
2.71
1024.3
Fe 2p3/2
715.4 ev
3.9
893.8
Fe 2p1/2
729 ev
3.9
449.2
FeOOH
Fe 2p3/2
711.9 ev
2.4
6215
67.7%
Fe 2p1/2
725.5 ev
2.4
3125
Fe 2p3/2
719.9 ev
3.14
196.9
Fe 2p1/2
733.5 ev
3.14
99The peak curves of Fe 2p in the simulated carbonation solution fit three peak curves, and the corresponding compounds are Fe3O4 and FeOOH, respectively. By fitting, it can be concluded that the binding energy of the peak position and curve peak area of Fe element in corrosion solution of steel bar in chloride salt solution are shown in Table 3, the relative content of Fe3O4 is 39.9%, and the relative content of FeOOH is 60.1%.Table 3
XPS scanning data of Fe element in the simulate carbonized solution.
Ingredient
Energy level of Fe 2p
Binding energy of peak position
Half width
Peak area
Relative content
Fe3O4
Fe 2p3/2
710.8 ev
2.3
825.7
39.9%
Fe 2p1/2
724.4 ev
2.3
920.6
FeOOH
Fe 2p3/2
711.5 ev
2.4
1120.1
60.1%
Fe 2p1/2
725.1 ev
2.4
206.6
Fe 2p3/2
719.5 ev
3.14
1336.9
Fe 2p1/2
733.1 ev
3.14
206.6The peak curves of Fe 2p in carbonization and chloride salt composite pore solution fit five peak curves, and the corresponding compounds are Fe3O4, FeOOH, and FeCl3, respectively. By fitting, it can be concluded that the binding energy of the peak position and curve peak area of Fe element in corrosion solution of steel bar in chloride salt solution are shown in Table 4, the relative content of Fe3O4 is 19.3%, the relative content of FeOOH is 69.1%, and the relative content of FeCl3 is 11.6%.Table 4
XPS scanning data of Fe in the combined effect of carbonation and chloride salt.
Ingredient
Energy level of Fe 2p
Binding energy of peak position
Half width
Peak area
Relative content
Fe3O4
Fe 2p3/2
710.8 ev
2.3
906.7
19.3%
Fe 2p1/2
724.4 ev
2.3
305.1
FeOOH
Fe 2p3/2
711.5 ev
2.4
2230.6
69.1%
Fe 2p1/2
725.1 ev
2.4
312.3
Fe 2p3/2
719.5 ev
3.14
2323.1
Fe 2p1/2
733.1 ev
3.14
343.1
FeCl3
Fe 2p3/2
713.9 ev
2.7
409.9
11.6%
Fe 2p1/2
727.5 ev
2.7
102.4
Fe 2p3/2
721.9 ev
3.2
468.4
Fe 2p1/2
735.5 ev
3.2
130.3


## 3.2. XRD Analysis of Corroded Steel

Reinforced corroded surface with 5000 times magnification of the scanning electron microscope (SEM) and corresponding corrosive X-ray diffraction spectrum (XRD) after immersing for 6 months in the chloride salt simulated pore solution is shown in Figure3(a). Most of the surface of the reinforced concrete in the simulated chloride salt solution is not corroded, and the surface is relatively flat and locally convex, indicating that part of the surface is covered with corrosives and the corrosion layer is a thin layer. The steel surface enlarged 5K times and holes were found in some places, indicating the passivation film of the reinforcing steel in the simulated concrete pore solution is slowly penetrated by chloride ions and begins to corrode. Analysis by JADE6.5 software shows that there are two clear main peaks at 44.6° and 64.9° in 2θ of steel of chloride salt solution. The results show that there are many noncorroded areas in the simulated salt solution of chloride salt. Compared with other standard cards, it is found that the corrosion products in this solution are mainly FeOOH and FeO, which is consistent with the results of the previous XPS analysis.Figure 3
Morphology and composition of corroded surface of steel bar.
(a)
Chloride salt solution
(b)
Carbonized pore solution
(c)
Carbonization and chloride salt composite pore solutionReinforced corroded surface with 5000 times magnification of the scanning electron microscope (SEM) and corresponding corrosive X-ray diffraction spectrum (XRD) after immersing for 6 months in the simulation of carbide pore solution is shown in Figure3(b). Steel surface generated a yellow-black rust, but the surface is relatively smooth, with no rust protrusions. The steel surface enlarged 5K times and it was found that reinforced steel surface has been corroded and loose porous, with stick shape, and there are three clear main peaks at 36.8°, 44.7°, and 65.1° in 2θ of steel. Compared with the XRD standard card, the main diffraction peak of Fe3O4 was found, and the diffraction peak of the simple Fe was not found. Compared with Figure 3(a), there were other minor peaks. This shows that the surface of the rebar immersed in the simulation of carbide pore solution has been completely corroded with the formation of FeOOH and Fe2O3, which is a good supplement to XPS analysis.Reinforced corroded surface with 5000 times magnification of the scanning electron microscope (SEM) and corresponding corrosive X-ray diffraction spectrum (XRD) after immersing for 6 months in carbonation and chloride salt composite pore solution is shown in Figure3(c). The corroded steel bars are brown in color and are in the shape of a layer with uneven thickness distribution and spalling phenomenon. The peak value of the corrosion products is conspicuous with respect to Figures 3(a) and 3(b). The main diffraction peak compared with the standard card shows FeOOH, subpeak was found in FeCl3 and Fe3O4 in the corrosion, and the intensity has been enhanced. This shows that the corrosion of reinforcing steel is more serious under the condition of chloride salt and carbonized composite, which is consistent with the result of XPS analysis.


## 4. Conclusion

(1)
Steel passivation film and rust coexist in chloride salt simulated concrete pore solution, the surface state is more dense, and the main components of corrosion are FeOOH and FeO. Being reinforced with yellow and black rust corrosion and loose porous in the simulation of carbide pore solution, the main ingredients are FeOOH, Fe3O4, and Fe2O3.
(2)
There is a lot of brown rust on the surface of the corrosive and the surface of corrosive was exfoliated in carbonation and chloride salt composite pore solution. The main components are FeOOH, Fe3O4, and FeCl3, where FeOOH content is more than 60%.
(3)
The ratio of Fe3+/Fe2+ increases as chloride ions increase or carbonization increases. And the ratio is maximum under the combined action of chloride ion and carbonization.



---

*Source: 7479383-2018-06-19.xml*