# On-Body Characterization of Planar Differential Antennas for Multiple, Wide, and Narrow Bands

Authors: Luigi Vallozzi; Domenico Pepe; Thijs Castel; Hendrik Rogier; Domenico Zito
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

This paper reports the results of the on-body experimental tests of a set of four planar differential antennas, originated by design variations of radiating elements with the same shape and characterized by the potential for covering wide and narrow bands. All the antenna designs have been implemented on low-cost FR4 substrate and characterized experimentally through on-body measurements. The results show the impact of the proximity to the human body on antenna performance and the opportunities in terms of potential coverage of wide and narrow bands for future ad hoc designs and implementations through wearable substrates targeting on-body and off-body communication and sensing applications.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

UWB radar for contactless detection of respiratory rate of human beings [1–4] is an active research area requiring innovative transceiver and antenna developments [5, 6]. A novel planar differential antenna was proposed recently by our research group [7]. This antenna was designed to meet the design constrains, electromagnetic performance, and physical integration, required by the ultrawideband (UWB) pulse radar sensor operating approximately in the frequency band from 3 to 5 GHz [2–4]. The proximity between the radiating elements of the proposed differential antenna has allowed achieving a significant bandwidth enhancement. In addition to original differential antenna development, we also investigated some design variations with the objective of showing how these reflect on the antenna performance, showing that the antennas originating from radiating elements with the same shape can be potentially adopted through an agile design strategy to cover wide and narrow bands of interest for a number of wireless applications, communication, and sensing, as a consequence of variations in size and orientation of the radiating elements with respect to the original planar differential antenna [8].Numerous studies were carried out about the effects of human body on performance of planar antennas. Concerningnondifferential antennas, many contributions reported the effects onS-parameters and gain patterns, like in [9, 10]. Consideringdifferentially fed antennas, in [11], the in-body near-field radiation pattern of an on-body antenna was characterized. In other studies, implantable antennas were considered, like in [12, 13], where the in-body radiation patterns andS-parameters were investigated. However, to the authors’ knowledge, the experimental characterization of differential antennas on human body, in terms ofoff-body far-field radiation patterns, which is proposed in the present paper, has received no attention yet in existing literature.Fully differential transceivers are less prone to common-mode noise and interferers; thereby differential antennas could play a significant role in future networks and communications, especially considering the massive amount of devices envisaged for the Internet of Things era [14, 15] that are supposed to operate in regions of frequency spectrum already crowded by existing applications and services.In this paper, we report for the first time the results of the on-body experimental characterization of the variations of planar differential antenna design described in [8], resulting from measurements on a real human subject, which have not been reported in any of our previous publications. For reasons of space, the details and results of previous publication [8] will be not repeated here. Thereby, for the insights about the design, inherent properties, and free-space (in air) performances of the antennas, we invite the reader to inspect our previous work reported in [8]. In particular, in this work, here, we will show for the first time how the proximity to the human body affects the antenna performance and that the antennas, all originating from radiating elements with the same shape, can be potentially adopted in future ad hoc designs on flexible substrates or textile fabrics to cover multiple, wide, and narrow bands of interest for a number of wearable applications for both communication and sensing [16].The paper is organized as follows. Section2 reports the description of the antenna design variations and summarizes, for reasons of self-consistency, the main results obtained from the previous free-space tests, which provide the term of reference for design and performance. Section 3 reports the measurement results obtained from the tests on a real human body. Finally, in Section 4, the conclusions are drawn.


## 2. Planar Differential Antennas: Designs and Tests

Two different sets of planar differential antennas were designed on a low-cost FR4 substrate (εr=4.4, dielectric thickness T=1.6 mm, copper thickness t=35 μm, and loss tangent tan⁡δ=0.02) for a complete characterization as stand-alone devices. The layout drawing of the first set of antennas, namely,folded planar differential antennas, is shown in Figure 1. The layout drawing of the second set of antennas, beingantipodal planar differential antennas, is shown in Figure 2. At first glance, we observe that each radiating element of the antenna consists of a semicircle and a triangle that provides a smooth transition towards the input pins [7]. In particular, in the folded planar differential antenna, the two radiating elements are folded one aside the other. In particular, the design is characterized by the aperture angle of triangle α and rotation angle ρ between the symmetry axes of the two radiating elements. The main features of this design approach are that it allows a compact design of both the transmitter and receiver antennas on the same board of the implemented radar sensor based on a system-on-a-chip radar transceiver, still maintaining good performance [2–4]. In the antipodal planar differential antenna, the two radiating elements are rotated by 180° one with respect to the others, so resulting in an antipodal position.Figure 1
Layout drawing of the folded planar differential antennas. The top copper layer is in light grey and the bottom copper layer is in dark grey.Figure 2
Layout drawing of the antipodal planar differential antennas. The top copper layer is in light grey and the bottom copper layer is in dark grey.In the following subsections, we will summarize the results obtained for the experimental open-space tests. In particular, we report the results of two antenna designs for each set, folded and antipodal, as follows:(A)
Folded planar differential antenna withρ = 45° and D = 3 cm, as shown in Figure 1.(B)
Folded planar differential antenna withρ = 45° and D = 4 cm, as shown in Figure 1.(C)
Antipodal planar differential antennas withρ = 180° and D = 3 cm, as shown in Figure 2.(D)
Antipodal planar differential antennas withρ = 180° and D = 4 cm, as shown in Figure 2.All the antenna designs were carried out by means of the electromagnetic (EM) simulator Momentum by Keysight Technologies®, and characterized experimentally in anechoic chamber.


### 2.1. Folded Radiating Elements:ρ = 45° and D = 3 cm

The physical implementation is shown in Figure3. Distance d between the two sides of the antenna is equal to 1 mm. Diameter D is equal to 3 cm in order to resonate at the frequency of interest (i.e., roughly 3 GHz). The aperture angle of the triangle is α = 45°. The rotation angle of the two radiating elements is ρ = 45°.Figure 3
Photograph of the physical implementation of the folded planar differential antenna (ρ = 45°, D = 3 cm).Two microstrip feeding lines were added in order to allow the connection of the antenna to a Vector Network Analyzer (VNA) by means of 2.92 mm connectors (horizontal) and carry out the experimental tests. Width of the microstrip line feeding paths (Wp) is equal to 3 mm in order to exhibit a characteristic impedance of Zc=50 Ω. The distance between the two inputs of the antenna is equal to din = 1 cm to allow the placement of two adjacent connectors, as shown in Figure 1. The characteristic sizes of the UWB antenna are reported in Table 1. The simulated and measured S11 parameter and VSWR are reported in Figure 4. The measured S11 exhibits a magnitude lower than −10 dB almost in the whole band of interest, roughly from 3 to 5 GHz [17, 18]. Figure 4 reports also the results for the voltage wave standing ratio (VSWR), which is lower than two almost in the whole band of interest.Table 1
Folded planar differential antenna sizing (D=3 cm).
D [cm] α [deg] ρ [deg] d [mm] W p [mm] d i n [cm] W G N D [cm] L G N D [cm] L [cm] 3 45 45 1 3 1 7.1 2.3 7.9Figure 4
Measured and simulatedS11 and VSWR versus frequency of the folded planar differential antenna (ρ = 45°, D = 3 cm).


### 2.2. Folded Radiating Elements:ρ = 45° and D = 4 cm

Simulated and measuredS11 parameter as a function of frequency of the antenna with folded radiating elements (ρ = 45° with D = 4 cm) are shown in Figure 5. All the other design parameters are unchanged with respect to the folded antenna with D=3cm. The measurements show S11 lower than approximately −7.5 dB from 2.4 to 5 GHz. In particular, S11<-10 dB roughly from 2.3 to 2.7 GHz and from 3.3 to 5.1 GHz. Figure 5 reports also the measurement results for the VSWR which is lower than about 2 over the same bands reported above, for the measured antenna. As expected, the results confirm that the bandwidth, for this design variation with D = 4 cm, is extended roughly for about 0.5 GHz towards the lower frequencies with respect to the original design with D=3 cm. This result shows that this design variation has the potential to be compatible with multiband operations for both industrial scientific medical (ISM) narrow band at 2.4 GHz [19, 20] and the lower portion of the UWB band from about 3 to 5 GHz [3].Figure 5
Measured and simulatedS11 and VSWR as a function of frequency for the folded planar differential antenna (ρ = 45°, D = 4 cm).


### 2.3. Antipodal Radiating Elements:ρ = 180° and D = 3 cm

The physical implementation of the antipodal planar differential antenna is shown in Figure6. The design parameters are summarized in Table 2. S11 parameter and VSWR resulting from simulations and measurements are shown in Figure 7. S11 is lower than −10 dB in the frequency band from about 1.1 to 1.44 GHz. The antenna is thus compatible with operation in 1.2 GHz lower L-band adopted by satellite applications for Global Positioning and Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) [21].Table 2
Antipodal planar differential antenna sizing (D=3 cm).
D [cm] α [deg] ρ [deg] d i n [cm] W G N D [cm] L G N D [cm] W [cm] L [cm] 3 45 180 1 0.8 1.4 4 11.2Figure 6
Antipodal planar differential antenna: photograph of the physical implementation. The two 2.92 mm connectors (vertical) are soldered on the bottom plane.Figure 7
Measured and simulatedS11 and VSWR as a function of frequency for the antipodal planar differential antenna (ρ = 180°, D = 3 cm).


### 2.4. Antipodal Radiating Elements:ρ = 180° and D = 4 cm

In this design, we haveD=4 cm, L=14.6 cm, and W = 5 cm. All the other design parameters are unchanged with respect to those summarized for the previous case in Table 2.S 11 parameter and VSWR resulting from simulations and measurements are shown in Figure 8. We get S11<-10 dB in the frequency band from 0.8 to 1.06 GHz.Figure 8
Measured and simulatedS11 and VSWR as a function of frequency for the antipodal planar differential antenna (ρ = 180°, D = 4 cm).It is worth observing how the increase of diameter (D=4 cm), with respect to the case with D = 3 cm, enables the potential coverage of the ISM band at 868 MHz [22, 23].The discrepancies between measured and simulatedS11, for the discussed antenna variations, are the results of a number of factors influencing the impedance matching of the antenna prototype during measurements, which are not taken into account in the simulation model. Namely, the presence of SMA connectors and solders in the real prototype, not accounting for in the simulation, can result in deviation of input impedances, with a consequent variation in measuredS-parameters with respect to the simulated ones. Measurement cables, although accurately shielded during measurements, can also be partly responsible for such deviations, it is very difficult to completely eliminate coupling between them and the radiating elements. However, the discrepancies can be still considered more than acceptable.


## 2.1. Folded Radiating Elements:ρ = 45° and D = 3 cm

The physical implementation is shown in Figure3. Distance d between the two sides of the antenna is equal to 1 mm. Diameter D is equal to 3 cm in order to resonate at the frequency of interest (i.e., roughly 3 GHz). The aperture angle of the triangle is α = 45°. The rotation angle of the two radiating elements is ρ = 45°.Figure 3
Photograph of the physical implementation of the folded planar differential antenna (ρ = 45°, D = 3 cm).Two microstrip feeding lines were added in order to allow the connection of the antenna to a Vector Network Analyzer (VNA) by means of 2.92 mm connectors (horizontal) and carry out the experimental tests. Width of the microstrip line feeding paths (Wp) is equal to 3 mm in order to exhibit a characteristic impedance of Zc=50 Ω. The distance between the two inputs of the antenna is equal to din = 1 cm to allow the placement of two adjacent connectors, as shown in Figure 1. The characteristic sizes of the UWB antenna are reported in Table 1. The simulated and measured S11 parameter and VSWR are reported in Figure 4. The measured S11 exhibits a magnitude lower than −10 dB almost in the whole band of interest, roughly from 3 to 5 GHz [17, 18]. Figure 4 reports also the results for the voltage wave standing ratio (VSWR), which is lower than two almost in the whole band of interest.Table 1
Folded planar differential antenna sizing (D=3 cm).
D [cm] α [deg] ρ [deg] d [mm] W p [mm] d i n [cm] W G N D [cm] L G N D [cm] L [cm] 3 45 45 1 3 1 7.1 2.3 7.9Figure 4
Measured and simulatedS11 and VSWR versus frequency of the folded planar differential antenna (ρ = 45°, D = 3 cm).


## 2.2. Folded Radiating Elements:ρ = 45° and D = 4 cm

Simulated and measuredS11 parameter as a function of frequency of the antenna with folded radiating elements (ρ = 45° with D = 4 cm) are shown in Figure 5. All the other design parameters are unchanged with respect to the folded antenna with D=3cm. The measurements show S11 lower than approximately −7.5 dB from 2.4 to 5 GHz. In particular, S11<-10 dB roughly from 2.3 to 2.7 GHz and from 3.3 to 5.1 GHz. Figure 5 reports also the measurement results for the VSWR which is lower than about 2 over the same bands reported above, for the measured antenna. As expected, the results confirm that the bandwidth, for this design variation with D = 4 cm, is extended roughly for about 0.5 GHz towards the lower frequencies with respect to the original design with D=3 cm. This result shows that this design variation has the potential to be compatible with multiband operations for both industrial scientific medical (ISM) narrow band at 2.4 GHz [19, 20] and the lower portion of the UWB band from about 3 to 5 GHz [3].Figure 5
Measured and simulatedS11 and VSWR as a function of frequency for the folded planar differential antenna (ρ = 45°, D = 4 cm).


## 2.3. Antipodal Radiating Elements:ρ = 180° and D = 3 cm

The physical implementation of the antipodal planar differential antenna is shown in Figure6. The design parameters are summarized in Table 2. S11 parameter and VSWR resulting from simulations and measurements are shown in Figure 7. S11 is lower than −10 dB in the frequency band from about 1.1 to 1.44 GHz. The antenna is thus compatible with operation in 1.2 GHz lower L-band adopted by satellite applications for Global Positioning and Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) [21].Table 2
Antipodal planar differential antenna sizing (D=3 cm).
D [cm] α [deg] ρ [deg] d i n [cm] W G N D [cm] L G N D [cm] W [cm] L [cm] 3 45 180 1 0.8 1.4 4 11.2Figure 6
Antipodal planar differential antenna: photograph of the physical implementation. The two 2.92 mm connectors (vertical) are soldered on the bottom plane.Figure 7
Measured and simulatedS11 and VSWR as a function of frequency for the antipodal planar differential antenna (ρ = 180°, D = 3 cm).


## 2.4. Antipodal Radiating Elements:ρ = 180° and D = 4 cm

In this design, we haveD=4 cm, L=14.6 cm, and W = 5 cm. All the other design parameters are unchanged with respect to those summarized for the previous case in Table 2.S 11 parameter and VSWR resulting from simulations and measurements are shown in Figure 8. We get S11<-10 dB in the frequency band from 0.8 to 1.06 GHz.Figure 8
Measured and simulatedS11 and VSWR as a function of frequency for the antipodal planar differential antenna (ρ = 180°, D = 4 cm).It is worth observing how the increase of diameter (D=4 cm), with respect to the case with D = 3 cm, enables the potential coverage of the ISM band at 868 MHz [22, 23].The discrepancies between measured and simulatedS11, for the discussed antenna variations, are the results of a number of factors influencing the impedance matching of the antenna prototype during measurements, which are not taken into account in the simulation model. Namely, the presence of SMA connectors and solders in the real prototype, not accounting for in the simulation, can result in deviation of input impedances, with a consequent variation in measuredS-parameters with respect to the simulated ones. Measurement cables, although accurately shielded during measurements, can also be partly responsible for such deviations, it is very difficult to completely eliminate coupling between them and the radiating elements. However, the discrepancies can be still considered more than acceptable.


## 3. On-Body Characterization

All four variations of planar differential antennas summarized in the previous section were characterized through on-body experimental tests, in order to investigate the impact of the proximity to the human body on the antenna performance and explore their potentialities for future implementations through ad hoc designs on flexible substrates or textile fabrics [14] and exploitation in wearable applications [21].The measurements were carried out in anechoic chamber, where the antennas under test were placed on the chest area of a real human subject, with fixed distance of 15 mm between the printed circuit board of the antenna and the body surface, achieved by means of a dielectric spacer placed between them. Each antenna was mounted on the spacer, and all together were placed on the chest of the human body. The radiating element of the antenna is on the opposite side of the interface with the spacer.z-axis is oriented away from and perpendicularly to the body surface, and y-axis is pointing upwards, as shown in Figures 9 and 10(a). The main physical and dielectric characteristics parameters of the antenna and spacer fabric are reported in Table 3.Table 3
Physical and electric parameters of antenna and spacer.
Dielectric layers Conductive layers Substrate Spacer Material FR4 “3 mesh®” spacer fabric–Müller Textil Material Copper T [mm] 1.6 15 t [µm] 35 ε r 4.4 ≈1.05 σ [S/m] 5.96 × 107 tan ⁡ δ 0.02 ≈0Figure 9
Cross section of planar antenna, dielectric spacer, and human body.Figure 10
Photographs of the experimental setup. (a) Planar differential antenna placed on a spacer and then on the chest of the human body, along with the antenna reference system. (b) Standard-gain horn antenna.
(a) (b)It is worth remarking that the purpose of the experimental on-body characterization was to test a realistic situation, that is, with the antenna placed on a real human body, where slight distance variations occur due to small body movements due to respiration and spacer compression. The scheme in Figure9 is therefore a simple illustrative representation of the antenna placement on the body, not displaying the above-mentioned realistic effects.The reflection coefficient as a function of frequency and the differential gain pattern on azimuth plane (xz), Gd(θ) were determined for all four antennas. The gain pattern was derived by measuring, by means of an Agilent PNAX network analyzer, transmission coefficient Sd1 between the single output of a standard-gain horn and the differential terminals of the antenna under test, for different azimuth (θ) orientations, then rescaling the measured value by calibrating path loss, gain of the transmitting horn, and mismatch factors at both ends, in order to obtain the gain pattern. For all the measurements, particular care was taken to avoid as much possible interference and scattering as possible from measurement cables which, for this purpose, were covered by radiofrequency absorbing material. In addition, ferrite chokes were placed around the measurement cables in order to furtherly reduce scattering and undesired coupling with the antenna.


### 3.1. Folded Radiating Elements:ρ = 45° and D=3 cm

The measured reflection coefficient and azimuth gain pattern atf = 3 GHz, for the smaller antenna with folded radiating elements, on human body, are shown in Figures 11 and 12, respectively. One can see how the reflection coefficient, compared to the open-space measurements, is affected by small variations due to the proximity with human body. However, the reflection coefficient remains more than acceptable, being S11<-10 dB in the frequency band from 2.85 to 4.53 GHz.Figure 11
On-body measuredS11 and VSWR versus frequency of the folded planar differential antenna with ρ = 45° and D = 3 cm.Figure 12
Measured differential gain pattern atf=3 GHz in the azimuth plane (xz) for the folded planar differential antenna (ρ = 45°, D = 3 cm).The measured differential gain pattern atf = 3 GHz (i.e., about the lowest resonance frequency), shown in Figure 12, exhibits a main lobe in the half space oriented away from the human body (i.e., -90°<θ<+90°). The maximum gain for θ=0° is about 4.14 dBi, which is increased by an amount of about 2.7 dB with respect to the open-space case, for which the maximum gain was about 1.43 dBi. It is worth noting that, in this case, the human body is acting as a reflector, producing an increase of the maximum gain and directivity. The backscattering gain is largely attenuated by the human body which absorbs most of the power radiated by the antenna.Thereby, this antenna is also capable of operating when worn by a human body, for UWB off-body wireless communications in the lower portion of the UWB frequency spectrum (e.g., 3–5 GHz).


### 3.2. Folded Radiating Elements:ρ = 45° and D=4 cm

Figures13 and 14 show the measured differential reflection coefficient and the azimuth gain pattern of the larger version of the antenna with folded elements (i.e., with D = 4 cm). Similar to the folded antenna with D = 3 cm, the reflection coefficient and consequently the VSWR undergo a slight variation due to the presence of the human body. In particular, we have S11<-8.3 dB and VSWR < 2.1 in the lower portion of the UWB band from 3 to 5 GHz, which indicates more than acceptable performance of this antenna when worn on human body. Moreover, S11<-10 dB in the bands from 2.3 to 2.7 GHz and from 3.3 to 5 GHz. Concerning the measured gain pattern of the on-body antenna shown in Figure 14, at f = 2.5 GHz, this has a main lobe directed away from the body with a maximum of about 1.5 dBi in broadside direction.Figure 13
On-body measuredS11 and VSWR versus frequency of the folded planar differential antenna with ρ = 45° and D = 4 cm.Figure 14
Measured differential gain pattern atf=2.5 GHz in azimuth plane (xz) for the folded planar differential antenna (ρ = 45°, D = 4 cm).The maximum gain is increased of about 3.5 dB when compared to open-space measurements, indicating reflection from the human body. This antenna variation, similar to the antenna with larger folded elements, is potentially suitable for on-body operation in UWB off-body communications in the lower UWB spectrum and 2.4 GHz ISM band.


### 3.3. Antipodal Radiating Elements:ρ = 180° and D=3 cm

The on-body measured reflection coefficient and gain pattern atf=1.2 GHz, compared to the open-space results, for the smaller antipodal antenna are shown in Figures 15 and 16, respectively. The reflection coefficient is affected by slight variations due to the proximity to the human body. In particular, −10 dB S11 band becomes slightly narrower, extending in the frequency band from 1.08 to 1.37 GHz, and the resonance frequency decreases by about 10 MHz to value of f = 1.21 GHz.Figure 15
On-body measuredS11 and VSWR versus frequency of the planar differential antenna with antipodal radiating elements (ρ = 180°, D = 3 cm).Figure 16
Measured differential gain pattern atf=1.2 GHz in azimuth plane (xz) for the antipodal planar differential antenna (ρ = 180°, D = 3 cm).The gain pattern, shown in Figure16, measured at f=1.2 GHz, is prone to severe attenuation of the backscattering due to the human body and has a maximum value of about 0.5 dBi, that is slightly larger than value of −0.3 dBi obtained for the open-space case. Finally, in the on-body operation, this antenna remains capable of operating reliably in 1.2 GHz lower L-band for GNSS applications.


### 3.4. Antipodal Radiating Elements:ρ = 180° and D=4 cm

The experimental results for the bigger version of the planar differential antenna with antipodal elements (D=4 cm) are shown in Figures 17 and 18.Figure 17
Measured and simulatedS11 and VSWR versus frequency of the planar differential antenna with antipodal radiating elements (ρ = 180°, D = 4 cm).Figure 18
Measured differential gain pattern atf=0.868 GHz in azimuth plane (xz) for the folded planar differential antenna (ρ = 45°, D = 4 cm).The differential reflection coefficient, shown in Figure17, indicates a resonance frequency of about 874 MHz, slightly decreased with respect to the open-space case, and S11<-10 dB (or VSWR < 1.92) in the band from 820 to 954 MHz, slightly narrower than the open-space band. The proximity to the human body worsens slightly the impedance matching performance with respect to the open-space measurements. In spite of all, the body-worn antenna is still capable of providing a good coverage of the 868 MHz ISM band.As for the gain pattern inxz plane, Figure 18 shows that the gain pattern at f=868 MHz of the antenna worn on body is affected by a reduction of the maximum gain, which amounts to about −1 dBi, 2 dB lower than the value of about 1 dBi in open space. Moreover, the backscattering of the gain pattern is, similar to all other antennas, severely attenuated by the human body. This antenna variation, in on-body operation, still exhibits the characteristic performance suitable for its potential usage in the Ultra High Frequency (UHF) band at 915 MHz for Radiofrequency Identification (RFID).


## 3.1. Folded Radiating Elements:ρ = 45° and D=3 cm

The measured reflection coefficient and azimuth gain pattern atf = 3 GHz, for the smaller antenna with folded radiating elements, on human body, are shown in Figures 11 and 12, respectively. One can see how the reflection coefficient, compared to the open-space measurements, is affected by small variations due to the proximity with human body. However, the reflection coefficient remains more than acceptable, being S11<-10 dB in the frequency band from 2.85 to 4.53 GHz.Figure 11
On-body measuredS11 and VSWR versus frequency of the folded planar differential antenna with ρ = 45° and D = 3 cm.Figure 12
Measured differential gain pattern atf=3 GHz in the azimuth plane (xz) for the folded planar differential antenna (ρ = 45°, D = 3 cm).The measured differential gain pattern atf = 3 GHz (i.e., about the lowest resonance frequency), shown in Figure 12, exhibits a main lobe in the half space oriented away from the human body (i.e., -90°<θ<+90°). The maximum gain for θ=0° is about 4.14 dBi, which is increased by an amount of about 2.7 dB with respect to the open-space case, for which the maximum gain was about 1.43 dBi. It is worth noting that, in this case, the human body is acting as a reflector, producing an increase of the maximum gain and directivity. The backscattering gain is largely attenuated by the human body which absorbs most of the power radiated by the antenna.Thereby, this antenna is also capable of operating when worn by a human body, for UWB off-body wireless communications in the lower portion of the UWB frequency spectrum (e.g., 3–5 GHz).


## 3.2. Folded Radiating Elements:ρ = 45° and D=4 cm

Figures13 and 14 show the measured differential reflection coefficient and the azimuth gain pattern of the larger version of the antenna with folded elements (i.e., with D = 4 cm). Similar to the folded antenna with D = 3 cm, the reflection coefficient and consequently the VSWR undergo a slight variation due to the presence of the human body. In particular, we have S11<-8.3 dB and VSWR < 2.1 in the lower portion of the UWB band from 3 to 5 GHz, which indicates more than acceptable performance of this antenna when worn on human body. Moreover, S11<-10 dB in the bands from 2.3 to 2.7 GHz and from 3.3 to 5 GHz. Concerning the measured gain pattern of the on-body antenna shown in Figure 14, at f = 2.5 GHz, this has a main lobe directed away from the body with a maximum of about 1.5 dBi in broadside direction.Figure 13
On-body measuredS11 and VSWR versus frequency of the folded planar differential antenna with ρ = 45° and D = 4 cm.Figure 14
Measured differential gain pattern atf=2.5 GHz in azimuth plane (xz) for the folded planar differential antenna (ρ = 45°, D = 4 cm).The maximum gain is increased of about 3.5 dB when compared to open-space measurements, indicating reflection from the human body. This antenna variation, similar to the antenna with larger folded elements, is potentially suitable for on-body operation in UWB off-body communications in the lower UWB spectrum and 2.4 GHz ISM band.


## 3.3. Antipodal Radiating Elements:ρ = 180° and D=3 cm

The on-body measured reflection coefficient and gain pattern atf=1.2 GHz, compared to the open-space results, for the smaller antipodal antenna are shown in Figures 15 and 16, respectively. The reflection coefficient is affected by slight variations due to the proximity to the human body. In particular, −10 dB S11 band becomes slightly narrower, extending in the frequency band from 1.08 to 1.37 GHz, and the resonance frequency decreases by about 10 MHz to value of f = 1.21 GHz.Figure 15
On-body measuredS11 and VSWR versus frequency of the planar differential antenna with antipodal radiating elements (ρ = 180°, D = 3 cm).Figure 16
Measured differential gain pattern atf=1.2 GHz in azimuth plane (xz) for the antipodal planar differential antenna (ρ = 180°, D = 3 cm).The gain pattern, shown in Figure16, measured at f=1.2 GHz, is prone to severe attenuation of the backscattering due to the human body and has a maximum value of about 0.5 dBi, that is slightly larger than value of −0.3 dBi obtained for the open-space case. Finally, in the on-body operation, this antenna remains capable of operating reliably in 1.2 GHz lower L-band for GNSS applications.


## 3.4. Antipodal Radiating Elements:ρ = 180° and D=4 cm

The experimental results for the bigger version of the planar differential antenna with antipodal elements (D=4 cm) are shown in Figures 17 and 18.Figure 17
Measured and simulatedS11 and VSWR versus frequency of the planar differential antenna with antipodal radiating elements (ρ = 180°, D = 4 cm).Figure 18
Measured differential gain pattern atf=0.868 GHz in azimuth plane (xz) for the folded planar differential antenna (ρ = 45°, D = 4 cm).The differential reflection coefficient, shown in Figure17, indicates a resonance frequency of about 874 MHz, slightly decreased with respect to the open-space case, and S11<-10 dB (or VSWR < 1.92) in the band from 820 to 954 MHz, slightly narrower than the open-space band. The proximity to the human body worsens slightly the impedance matching performance with respect to the open-space measurements. In spite of all, the body-worn antenna is still capable of providing a good coverage of the 868 MHz ISM band.As for the gain pattern inxz plane, Figure 18 shows that the gain pattern at f=868 MHz of the antenna worn on body is affected by a reduction of the maximum gain, which amounts to about −1 dBi, 2 dB lower than the value of about 1 dBi in open space. Moreover, the backscattering of the gain pattern is, similar to all other antennas, severely attenuated by the human body. This antenna variation, in on-body operation, still exhibits the characteristic performance suitable for its potential usage in the Ultra High Frequency (UHF) band at 915 MHz for Radiofrequency Identification (RFID).


## 4. Conclusions

Four different variations of planar differential antennas, for wide and narrow band applications, differing in dimensions and orientation of the radiating elements, were experimentally characterized when worn on the chest of a human body. Measurements were performed of the differential reflection coefficient and horizontal gain pattern of the antenna, with a distance of 15 mm between antenna and human body. Results were compared with those obtained with the antenna in open space and the following observations could be made.Concerning the impact on the performance, the presence of the human body has a clear effect on reflection coefficient and gain patterns. In particular, as for the gain pattern, the proximity to the human body produces, for all antenna variations, a severe attenuation of the backscattering portion of the gain pattern, towards the back side of the wearer, due to absorption of the radiated power by the human body. Moreover, for 3 of the 4 antennas, the maximum gain measured on-body for the lowest resonance frequency, is affected by a small increase with respect to the open-space case, indicating that the human body acts as a reflector. For the larger (D = 4 cm) version of the antenna with antipodal elements only, the maximum gain results in a reduction of about 2 dB with respect to the open-space measurements. Concerning reflection coefficient, the presence of the human body results in small variations of the characteristics, with the most noticeable effect being a slight lowering of the resonance frequencies. The reflection coefficient performance remains more than acceptable for operation at the frequencies of interest.In conclusion, the performance of all antennas remains more than acceptable when they are worn at 15 mm of distance from the chest area of a human body. This proves the potential for future wearable implementations of all considered prototypes, in particular for short range off-body communications, with applications such as monitoring of vital signs or body area network personal communications. Moreover, the four antenna variations allow the coverage of several frequency bands of interests, such as the lower portion of the UWB from 3 to 5 GHz, the 868 MHz and 2.45 GHz ISM bands, the 1.2 GHz band (lower L-band) for the Global Positioning and Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), and the UHF band at 915 MHz for Radiofrequency Identification (RFID).



---

*Source: 7439403-2016-08-25.xml*