# Synthesis and Characterization of Metal Sulfides Nanoparticles/Poly(methyl methacrylate) Nanocomposites

Authors: Peter A. Ajibade; Johannes Z. Mbese
Journal: International Journal of Polymer Science
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

Metal sulfides nanoparticles in poly(methyl methacrylate) matrices were prepared and characterized by infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, powder X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscope (SEM), and transmission electron microscope (TEM). The FTIR confirms the dispersion of the nanoparticles in PMMA matrices with the C=O and C–O–C bonds of the PMMA shifting slightly which may be attributed to the interactions between the nanoparticles and PMMA. The ZnS nanoparticles in PMMA have average crystallite sizes of 4–7 nm while the CdS has particle size of 10 nm and HgS has crystallite sizes of 8–20 nm. The increasing order of particle sizes as calculated from the XRD is ZnS/PMMA<HgS/PMMA<CdS/PMMA and ranges from 1.02 to 1.35 nm. These calculated particle sizes are smaller than the values obtained from TEM.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In recent years, there have been reports of the incorporation of semiconductor metal sulfide nanoparticles into polymers by chemical methods and the polymer matrices serve to protect the particle surfaces [1]. Among the broad variety of available polymers, poly(methyl methacrylate) or PMMA is one of the most widely studied due to its outstanding mechanical and chemicophysical properties [2, 3]. The choice of polymers depends on the mechanical, thermal, electrical, optical, and magnetic properties of the polymers. However, other properties such as hydrophobic/hydrophilic balance, chemical stability, biocompatibility, optoelectronic properties, and chemical functionalities have also been considered [4]. The PMMA has a polar ester group −COOCH3 with a dipole moment of 1.6 Debye and dielectric constant of 3.4 [5]. Its wide applications in many technological and productive fields take advantage of the unique combination of excellence [1–9]. However, PMMA has limitations such as its thermal instability and inability to filter ultraviolet light which has restricted its universal usage. These drawbacks may be overcome by incorporation of semiconductor nanoparticles into the polymer matrices to form nanocomposites [10–12].Recent researches have focused on the synthesis, characterization, and optical properties of metal sulfides/polymer nanocomposites such as ZnS/PMMA and CdS/PMMA nanocomposites [13]. The incorporation of metal sulfide nanocrystals into polymer matrices has been accomplished via direct blending [14, 15], in situ synthesis of nanoparticles within polymer media [16, 17], and surface modification of nanoparticles with monomers followed by polymerization from nanoparticle surface and grafting of preformed functionalized polymers to nanoparticles [18]. The major goal for synthesis of nanocomposites is to obtain compounds that are optically clear and thermally stable with good mechanical properties [19]. However, shape control has been much more difficult to achieve; hence, exploration of novel method for the preparation of differently shaped nanoparticles in polymer matrix is challenging area of research [20]. In this study, we present the preparation of ZnS, CdS, and HgS nanoparticles in PMMA matrices. The nanocomposites were studied by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), thermogravimetric analyses (TGA), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM).


## 2. Results and Discussion

### 2.1. Synthesis

The procedure for the synthesis of the nanocomposites is shown in Scheme1. Yellow to white nanocomposites of ZnS/PMMA, CdS/PMMA, and HgS/PMMA were obtained in a good yield of 85–95% with thickness of 0.1-0.2 mm.Scheme 1
Steps for the preparation of the metal sulfides/PMMA nanocomposites.


### 2.2. Infrared Spectra

The infrared spectra of PMMA, ZnS/PMMA, CdS/PMMA, and HgS/PMMAnanocomposites are shown in Figure1. In the PMMA spectrum, the peak assigned to the C–H stretching vibration occurred at 2977 cm−1. The strong peak at 1730 cm−1 is assigned to υC=O stretching vibration. The peaks at 1157, 1199, and 1265 cm−1 correspond to C–O–C stretching and deformation vibrations. The peaks observed at 999 cm−1 and 858 cm−1 are due to C–H bending vibrations and the peak at 746 cm−1 is attributed to the vibrations of the polymer chains [11, 21].Figure 1
The FTIR spectra of PMMA and its metal sulfides/PMMA nanocomposites.The FTIR spectra of ZnS/PMMA, CdS/PMMA, and HgS/PMMA nanocomposites were compared to free PMMA spectra. The comparison gave almost identical feature, except the absence of peak around 1640 cm−1, due to the double bond of MMA monomer [22]. This also indicates the homogeneity of nanocomposites solution since only 3% weight of metal sulfide nanoparticles was used. These results confirmed that the dispersion of metal sulfide nanoparticles into PMMA was successful.


### 2.3. X-Ray Diffraction Patterns

The XRD patterns of ZnS/PMMA, CdS/PMMA, and HgS/PMMA nanocomposites were carefully studied and compared with that of pure PMMA as shown in Figure2. Shallow peaks were observed for pure PMMA matrix, suggesting the absence of nanoparticles. However, broad diffraction peaks appeared in the case of the ZnS embedded in PMMA matrix. The peak broadening in the XRD patterns clearly indicates the formation of ZnS nanoparticles of small size [23, 24]. Three characteristic peaks were observed for ZnS/PMMA nanocomposites corresponding to the lattice planes of (111), (220), and (311) that matched well with the cubic ZnS structure (JCPDS number 05-0566) [25]. It is worth noting that the peak percentage and intensity of inorganic phase in a nanocomposite sample are low but the signal corresponding to the most abundant crystallographic planes of PMMA matrix can be detected at diffraction angle 2θ = 10–20° [24, 26–28].Figure 2
XRD patterns of pure PMMA, ZnS/PMMA, CdS/PMMA, and HgS/PMMA nanocomposites.The average particle size has been calculated from X-ray diffraction study using the Debye Scherer formula [29]. The calculated size is found to be 1.02 nm, indicating the presence of nanosized ZnS nanoparticles. The XRD pattern (Figure 2) obtained for CdS2/PMMA nanocomposites corresponded to pure cubic CdS when compared with the standard reference (JCPDS 03-065-2887) [30]. Three peaks with 2θ values of 29.4, 43.3, and 52.3 appeared in the spectrum of the sample and may be assigned to the (111), (220), and (311) Miller indices. This confirms the presence of CdS nanoparticles incorporated into PMMA matrix because the pure PMMA pattern does not clearly display all the peaks observed in CdS/PMMA nanocomposites. The very broad XRD peak at a low diffraction angle, around 2θ = 13.5°, indicates amorphous PMMA [31]. The average crystallite size calculated using the Debye Scherer equation was 1.35 nm.The phase composition of as-synthesized HgS/PMMA nanocomposites shows three broad characteristic peaks for HgS/PMMA nanocomposites (2θ = 29.7°, 41.5°, and 52.5°) corresponding to the Miller indices (111), (220), and (311), respectively [32–34]. The broadness of the XRD peaks could be due to the homogeneity of the prepared nanocomposites solution. The broadening of the diffraction peaks allows an approximate evaluation of crystallite size by the Scherer formula and the distribution of peak intensities may give also an idea of nanoparticle shape [24]. The diffraction peak due to PMMA in the HgS/PMMA sample is at 2θ = 13.5°. The crystallite size as calculated from Scherer equation was found to be 1.07 nm. The increasing order of particle sizes is ZnS/PMMA < HgS/PMMA < CdS/PMMA ranging from 1.02 to 1.35 nm. These calculated particle sizes are smaller than those particle sizes obtained from electron microscopy, suggesting that estimating the particles using the XRD alone is not enough because of the presence of materials not directly estimated via XRD studies.


### 2.4. Thermogravimetric Analyses of the Metal Sulfides/PMMA Nanocomposites

The TGA decomposition patterns of metal sulfide/PMMA (ZnS/PMMA, CdS/PMMA, and HgS/PMMA) nanocomposites were studied and carefully compared with the decomposition curves of the PMMA polymer and their respective precursor complexes in Figure3.Figure 3
TGA curves for ML1L2 precursor complex, pure PMMA, and their MS2/PMMA nanocomposites. M = Zn, Cd, and Hg.The main degradation step of ZnS/PMMA nanocomposites occurs at 265–425°C. The TGA curves for free PMMA show one major decomposition step at 260–420°C, owing to the decomposition of PMMA matrix [21]. However, the thermal stability of the ZnS/PMMA nanocomposites is enhanced compared to the pure PMMA, which may be due to partially altered molecular mobility of the polymer chains due to their adsorption on the surface of the nanoparticles because of the amount of ZnS nanoparticles embedded into PMMA matrix [35]. The major decomposition step for CdS/PMMA nanocomposite occurs at about 270–430°C. These results depict that the thermal stability of CdS/PMMA nanocomposites is higher than that of its PMMA matrix showing strong interactions between the CdS nanoparticles and the PMMA polymer matrix. The TGA curve of the nanocomposites also indicates the presence of residue ascribed to the presence of the CdS2 nanoparticles dispersed in PMMA matrix. The TGA decomposition curves for HgS/PMMA nanocomposites indicate that the thermal stability for HgS/PMMA nanocomposites is similar to that of the PMMA matrix except that the nanocomposites started to decompose at a temperature below 100°C, accompanied with a weight loss of about 10%.When ZnS/PMMA, CdS2/PMMA, and HgS/PMMA nanocomposites are compared to their respective precursor complexes used in the synthesis of the metal sulfide nanoparticles, it could be noted that the nanocomposites are more thermally stable than their precursor complexes at temperatures below 400°C. This confirms strong interaction between metal sulfide nanoparticles and the polymer matrix. The precursor complexes seem to be more stable after 400°C due to the presence of metal sulfide nanoparticles residue although the mercury precursor complex shows the process of volatilization of the sample.


### 2.5. SEM and EDX of the Metal Sulfides Nanocomposites

The SEM micrograph of ZnS/PMMA (Figures4(A) and 4(B)) showed regular well spherical morphology of nanocomposites indicating that ZnS nanocomposites were hosted within PMMA matrix. EDX spectrum of ZnS/PMMA nanocomposites reveals that the prepared nanocomposites are mainly composed of zinc and sulfur atoms within the scan area, confirming the presence of ZnS nanoparticles in PMMA matrix. Other traces of elements like carbon and oxygen are observed possibly due to the use of carbon tape and retained solvent after the deposition step [25]. The intense Au peaks are due to gold and palladium coating which was used to overcome charging of samples.Figure 4
(A) and (B) are SEM micrograph of ZnS2/PMMA nanocomposites at different magnification; (C) EDX spectrum of the sample; (D) TEM micrograph.Figures5(A) and 5(B) show the CdS2/PMMA of the nanocomposites and the EDX spectrum is displayed in Figure 5(C). In these images, it could be seen that there is existence of CdS particles which are homogeneously dispersed in the PMMA matrix [36]. EDX spectrum of CdS/PMMA nanocomposites reveals that the prepared nanocomposites are mainly composed of cadmium and sulfur atoms within the scan area, confirming the presence of CdS nanoparticles in PMMA matrix. Other traces of elements like carbon and oxygen are observed possibly due to the use of carbon tape and retained solvent after the deposition step. The intense Au peaks are due to gold and palladium coating which was used to overcome charging of samples.Figure 5
(A) and (B) are SEM micrograph of CdS2/PMMA nanocomposites at different magnification prepared from 3 wt.% CdS2 nanoparticles dispersed in PMMA matrix. (C) EDX spectrum of the sample; (D) TEM micrograph.The surface morphology of the HgS/PMMA nanocomposites as shown in Figure6(A) and 6(B).  The pictures show evenly distributed spherical particles with agglomeration [23]. The EDX spectrum of the HgS/PMMA nanocomposites Figure  6(C) reveals that the prepared nanocomposites are mainly composed of Hg and S, confirming the presence of HgS nanoparticles within the host PMMA matrix.Figure 6
(A) and (B) are SEM micrograph of HgS2/PMMA nanocomposites. (C) EDX spectrum; (D) TEM image.


### 2.6. TEM Images of Metal Sulfides/PMMA Nanocomposites

The TEM image of ZnS/PMMA nanocomposites prepared from ZnS nanoparticles is shown in Figure4(D). The TEM image showed the metal sulfide nanoparticles within the host PMMA matrices [37]. All the particles are within a narrow particle size range of 4.31–7.32 nm and small degree of agglomeration of nanocomposites is evident from the TEM image. The TEM image of CdS2/PMMA nanocomposites (Figure 5(D)) showed nanocomposites with an average size of about 10 nm with a standard deviation of less than 2.0 nm. The nanocomposites showed mixture of cubic, hexagonal, and close-to-spherical particles that are similar to the TEM image of HDA-capped CdS2 nanoparticles. This similarity indicates that the shape of CdS2 nanoparticles is not affected by their dispersion in the polymer matrices. The polymer matrix holds the nanoparticles together and let them function as a unit. Lee et al. [30] reported similar results for CdS nanoparticles in thermotropic liquid crystal monomers.The TEM micrograph of the HgS2/PMMA nanocomposites (Figure6(D)) showed agglomerated particles that are in contact with each other. However most of the particles have irregular round shapes with relatively wide size distributions. The particles sizes are in the range of 8–20 nm which is in agreement with those reported [38, 39].


## 2.1. Synthesis

The procedure for the synthesis of the nanocomposites is shown in Scheme1. Yellow to white nanocomposites of ZnS/PMMA, CdS/PMMA, and HgS/PMMA were obtained in a good yield of 85–95% with thickness of 0.1-0.2 mm.Scheme 1
Steps for the preparation of the metal sulfides/PMMA nanocomposites.


## 2.2. Infrared Spectra

The infrared spectra of PMMA, ZnS/PMMA, CdS/PMMA, and HgS/PMMAnanocomposites are shown in Figure1. In the PMMA spectrum, the peak assigned to the C–H stretching vibration occurred at 2977 cm−1. The strong peak at 1730 cm−1 is assigned to υC=O stretching vibration. The peaks at 1157, 1199, and 1265 cm−1 correspond to C–O–C stretching and deformation vibrations. The peaks observed at 999 cm−1 and 858 cm−1 are due to C–H bending vibrations and the peak at 746 cm−1 is attributed to the vibrations of the polymer chains [11, 21].Figure 1
The FTIR spectra of PMMA and its metal sulfides/PMMA nanocomposites.The FTIR spectra of ZnS/PMMA, CdS/PMMA, and HgS/PMMA nanocomposites were compared to free PMMA spectra. The comparison gave almost identical feature, except the absence of peak around 1640 cm−1, due to the double bond of MMA monomer [22]. This also indicates the homogeneity of nanocomposites solution since only 3% weight of metal sulfide nanoparticles was used. These results confirmed that the dispersion of metal sulfide nanoparticles into PMMA was successful.


## 2.3. X-Ray Diffraction Patterns

The XRD patterns of ZnS/PMMA, CdS/PMMA, and HgS/PMMA nanocomposites were carefully studied and compared with that of pure PMMA as shown in Figure2. Shallow peaks were observed for pure PMMA matrix, suggesting the absence of nanoparticles. However, broad diffraction peaks appeared in the case of the ZnS embedded in PMMA matrix. The peak broadening in the XRD patterns clearly indicates the formation of ZnS nanoparticles of small size [23, 24]. Three characteristic peaks were observed for ZnS/PMMA nanocomposites corresponding to the lattice planes of (111), (220), and (311) that matched well with the cubic ZnS structure (JCPDS number 05-0566) [25]. It is worth noting that the peak percentage and intensity of inorganic phase in a nanocomposite sample are low but the signal corresponding to the most abundant crystallographic planes of PMMA matrix can be detected at diffraction angle 2θ = 10–20° [24, 26–28].Figure 2
XRD patterns of pure PMMA, ZnS/PMMA, CdS/PMMA, and HgS/PMMA nanocomposites.The average particle size has been calculated from X-ray diffraction study using the Debye Scherer formula [29]. The calculated size is found to be 1.02 nm, indicating the presence of nanosized ZnS nanoparticles. The XRD pattern (Figure 2) obtained for CdS2/PMMA nanocomposites corresponded to pure cubic CdS when compared with the standard reference (JCPDS 03-065-2887) [30]. Three peaks with 2θ values of 29.4, 43.3, and 52.3 appeared in the spectrum of the sample and may be assigned to the (111), (220), and (311) Miller indices. This confirms the presence of CdS nanoparticles incorporated into PMMA matrix because the pure PMMA pattern does not clearly display all the peaks observed in CdS/PMMA nanocomposites. The very broad XRD peak at a low diffraction angle, around 2θ = 13.5°, indicates amorphous PMMA [31]. The average crystallite size calculated using the Debye Scherer equation was 1.35 nm.The phase composition of as-synthesized HgS/PMMA nanocomposites shows three broad characteristic peaks for HgS/PMMA nanocomposites (2θ = 29.7°, 41.5°, and 52.5°) corresponding to the Miller indices (111), (220), and (311), respectively [32–34]. The broadness of the XRD peaks could be due to the homogeneity of the prepared nanocomposites solution. The broadening of the diffraction peaks allows an approximate evaluation of crystallite size by the Scherer formula and the distribution of peak intensities may give also an idea of nanoparticle shape [24]. The diffraction peak due to PMMA in the HgS/PMMA sample is at 2θ = 13.5°. The crystallite size as calculated from Scherer equation was found to be 1.07 nm. The increasing order of particle sizes is ZnS/PMMA < HgS/PMMA < CdS/PMMA ranging from 1.02 to 1.35 nm. These calculated particle sizes are smaller than those particle sizes obtained from electron microscopy, suggesting that estimating the particles using the XRD alone is not enough because of the presence of materials not directly estimated via XRD studies.


## 2.4. Thermogravimetric Analyses of the Metal Sulfides/PMMA Nanocomposites

The TGA decomposition patterns of metal sulfide/PMMA (ZnS/PMMA, CdS/PMMA, and HgS/PMMA) nanocomposites were studied and carefully compared with the decomposition curves of the PMMA polymer and their respective precursor complexes in Figure3.Figure 3
TGA curves for ML1L2 precursor complex, pure PMMA, and their MS2/PMMA nanocomposites. M = Zn, Cd, and Hg.The main degradation step of ZnS/PMMA nanocomposites occurs at 265–425°C. The TGA curves for free PMMA show one major decomposition step at 260–420°C, owing to the decomposition of PMMA matrix [21]. However, the thermal stability of the ZnS/PMMA nanocomposites is enhanced compared to the pure PMMA, which may be due to partially altered molecular mobility of the polymer chains due to their adsorption on the surface of the nanoparticles because of the amount of ZnS nanoparticles embedded into PMMA matrix [35]. The major decomposition step for CdS/PMMA nanocomposite occurs at about 270–430°C. These results depict that the thermal stability of CdS/PMMA nanocomposites is higher than that of its PMMA matrix showing strong interactions between the CdS nanoparticles and the PMMA polymer matrix. The TGA curve of the nanocomposites also indicates the presence of residue ascribed to the presence of the CdS2 nanoparticles dispersed in PMMA matrix. The TGA decomposition curves for HgS/PMMA nanocomposites indicate that the thermal stability for HgS/PMMA nanocomposites is similar to that of the PMMA matrix except that the nanocomposites started to decompose at a temperature below 100°C, accompanied with a weight loss of about 10%.When ZnS/PMMA, CdS2/PMMA, and HgS/PMMA nanocomposites are compared to their respective precursor complexes used in the synthesis of the metal sulfide nanoparticles, it could be noted that the nanocomposites are more thermally stable than their precursor complexes at temperatures below 400°C. This confirms strong interaction between metal sulfide nanoparticles and the polymer matrix. The precursor complexes seem to be more stable after 400°C due to the presence of metal sulfide nanoparticles residue although the mercury precursor complex shows the process of volatilization of the sample.


## 2.5. SEM and EDX of the Metal Sulfides Nanocomposites

The SEM micrograph of ZnS/PMMA (Figures4(A) and 4(B)) showed regular well spherical morphology of nanocomposites indicating that ZnS nanocomposites were hosted within PMMA matrix. EDX spectrum of ZnS/PMMA nanocomposites reveals that the prepared nanocomposites are mainly composed of zinc and sulfur atoms within the scan area, confirming the presence of ZnS nanoparticles in PMMA matrix. Other traces of elements like carbon and oxygen are observed possibly due to the use of carbon tape and retained solvent after the deposition step [25]. The intense Au peaks are due to gold and palladium coating which was used to overcome charging of samples.Figure 4
(A) and (B) are SEM micrograph of ZnS2/PMMA nanocomposites at different magnification; (C) EDX spectrum of the sample; (D) TEM micrograph.Figures5(A) and 5(B) show the CdS2/PMMA of the nanocomposites and the EDX spectrum is displayed in Figure 5(C). In these images, it could be seen that there is existence of CdS particles which are homogeneously dispersed in the PMMA matrix [36]. EDX spectrum of CdS/PMMA nanocomposites reveals that the prepared nanocomposites are mainly composed of cadmium and sulfur atoms within the scan area, confirming the presence of CdS nanoparticles in PMMA matrix. Other traces of elements like carbon and oxygen are observed possibly due to the use of carbon tape and retained solvent after the deposition step. The intense Au peaks are due to gold and palladium coating which was used to overcome charging of samples.Figure 5
(A) and (B) are SEM micrograph of CdS2/PMMA nanocomposites at different magnification prepared from 3 wt.% CdS2 nanoparticles dispersed in PMMA matrix. (C) EDX spectrum of the sample; (D) TEM micrograph.The surface morphology of the HgS/PMMA nanocomposites as shown in Figure6(A) and 6(B).  The pictures show evenly distributed spherical particles with agglomeration [23]. The EDX spectrum of the HgS/PMMA nanocomposites Figure  6(C) reveals that the prepared nanocomposites are mainly composed of Hg and S, confirming the presence of HgS nanoparticles within the host PMMA matrix.Figure 6
(A) and (B) are SEM micrograph of HgS2/PMMA nanocomposites. (C) EDX spectrum; (D) TEM image.


## 2.6. TEM Images of Metal Sulfides/PMMA Nanocomposites

The TEM image of ZnS/PMMA nanocomposites prepared from ZnS nanoparticles is shown in Figure4(D). The TEM image showed the metal sulfide nanoparticles within the host PMMA matrices [37]. All the particles are within a narrow particle size range of 4.31–7.32 nm and small degree of agglomeration of nanocomposites is evident from the TEM image. The TEM image of CdS2/PMMA nanocomposites (Figure 5(D)) showed nanocomposites with an average size of about 10 nm with a standard deviation of less than 2.0 nm. The nanocomposites showed mixture of cubic, hexagonal, and close-to-spherical particles that are similar to the TEM image of HDA-capped CdS2 nanoparticles. This similarity indicates that the shape of CdS2 nanoparticles is not affected by their dispersion in the polymer matrices. The polymer matrix holds the nanoparticles together and let them function as a unit. Lee et al. [30] reported similar results for CdS nanoparticles in thermotropic liquid crystal monomers.The TEM micrograph of the HgS2/PMMA nanocomposites (Figure6(D)) showed agglomerated particles that are in contact with each other. However most of the particles have irregular round shapes with relatively wide size distributions. The particles sizes are in the range of 8–20 nm which is in agreement with those reported [38, 39].


## 3. Experimental Section

### 3.1. Materials

Toluene was purchased from Aldrich. Poly(methyl methacrylate) PMMA was purchased from Aldrich. Toluene and PMMA were used as purchased, without further purification or modification. ZnS, CdS, and HgS were prepared from the (N-phenyl-N,N-methyl phenyl dithiocarbamate)M(II) complexes. ZnS, CdS, and HgS nanoparticles were prepared from (N-phenyl-N,N-ethylphenyldithiocarbamato)M(II) complexes [40].


### 3.2. Physical Measurements

Infrared spectra were recorded from KBr pellets in the range 4000–400 cm−1 on a Perkin Elmer 2000 FT-IR spectrometer. Powder X-ray diffraction patterns were recorded on Bruker-D8 ADVANCE powder X-ray diffractometer instrument operating at a voltage of 40 kV and a current of 30 mA with Cu Kα radiation. Measurements were taken at a high angle 2θ range of 10–60° using a scan speed of 0.01°, with filter time constant of 2.5 s per step and a slit width of 6.0 mm. Thermogravimetric analyses experiments were carried out on a Perkin Elmer thermogravimetric analyser (TGA 7) fitted with a thermal analysis controller (TAC 7/DX). Samples of 10–20 mg of each complex were loaded into an alumina pan and weight changes were recorded as a function of temperature for a 10°C min−1 temperature gradient between 20°C and 800°C. A purge gas of flowing nitrogen at a rate of 20 mL min−1 was used.The FTIR was done as KBr discs on a Perkin Elmer Paragon 2000 FTIR spectrophotometer in the range 4000–370 cm−1. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained in a Jeol, JSM-6390 LV apparatus, using an accelerating voltage between 15 and 20 kV at different magnifications, as indicated in the SEM image. Energy dispersive spectra were processed using energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) attached to a Jeol, JSM-6390 LV SEM with Noran System Six software. The accelerating voltage of 20.0 kV and magnification of 1000 were used. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained using a ZEISS Libra 120 electron microscope operated at 120 kV. The samples were prepared by placing a drop of a solution of the sample in toluene on a carbon coated copper grid (300 mesh, agar). The excess solvent was wicked away with a paper tip and the samples were allowed to dry completely over night at room temperature. Images were recorded on a megaview G2 camera using iTEM Olympus software.


### 3.3. Synthesis of MS/PMMA Nanocomposites

The nanocomposites were prepared from their respective metal sulfide nanoparticles using modified methods reported by Prabhu and Pattabi [14] and Agrawal et al. [15]. In a typical experiment, 1.5 g of PMMA was dissolved in 20 mL toluene solution in a 100 mL glass beaker with the aid of magnetic stirrer for one hour. Another beaker solution containing 3.0% (0.045 g) weight percent of ZnS nanoparticles dissolved in toluene was slowly added into the beaker containing the PMMA toluene solution with heating and vigorous stirring. The experiment continued for about 30 minutes. The resulting turbid solutions were poured on a Petri dish and allowed to dry in air. The other solution containing PMMA only was also prepared the same way. The same procedure was used for the synthesis of CdS/PMMA and HgS/PMMA nanocomposites. White or light yellow nanocomposites of ZnS/PMMA, CdS/PMMA, and HgS/PMMA were obtained in 85–95%.


## 3.1. Materials

Toluene was purchased from Aldrich. Poly(methyl methacrylate) PMMA was purchased from Aldrich. Toluene and PMMA were used as purchased, without further purification or modification. ZnS, CdS, and HgS were prepared from the (N-phenyl-N,N-methyl phenyl dithiocarbamate)M(II) complexes. ZnS, CdS, and HgS nanoparticles were prepared from (N-phenyl-N,N-ethylphenyldithiocarbamato)M(II) complexes [40].


## 3.2. Physical Measurements

Infrared spectra were recorded from KBr pellets in the range 4000–400 cm−1 on a Perkin Elmer 2000 FT-IR spectrometer. Powder X-ray diffraction patterns were recorded on Bruker-D8 ADVANCE powder X-ray diffractometer instrument operating at a voltage of 40 kV and a current of 30 mA with Cu Kα radiation. Measurements were taken at a high angle 2θ range of 10–60° using a scan speed of 0.01°, with filter time constant of 2.5 s per step and a slit width of 6.0 mm. Thermogravimetric analyses experiments were carried out on a Perkin Elmer thermogravimetric analyser (TGA 7) fitted with a thermal analysis controller (TAC 7/DX). Samples of 10–20 mg of each complex were loaded into an alumina pan and weight changes were recorded as a function of temperature for a 10°C min−1 temperature gradient between 20°C and 800°C. A purge gas of flowing nitrogen at a rate of 20 mL min−1 was used.The FTIR was done as KBr discs on a Perkin Elmer Paragon 2000 FTIR spectrophotometer in the range 4000–370 cm−1. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained in a Jeol, JSM-6390 LV apparatus, using an accelerating voltage between 15 and 20 kV at different magnifications, as indicated in the SEM image. Energy dispersive spectra were processed using energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) attached to a Jeol, JSM-6390 LV SEM with Noran System Six software. The accelerating voltage of 20.0 kV and magnification of 1000 were used. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained using a ZEISS Libra 120 electron microscope operated at 120 kV. The samples were prepared by placing a drop of a solution of the sample in toluene on a carbon coated copper grid (300 mesh, agar). The excess solvent was wicked away with a paper tip and the samples were allowed to dry completely over night at room temperature. Images were recorded on a megaview G2 camera using iTEM Olympus software.


## 3.3. Synthesis of MS/PMMA Nanocomposites

The nanocomposites were prepared from their respective metal sulfide nanoparticles using modified methods reported by Prabhu and Pattabi [14] and Agrawal et al. [15]. In a typical experiment, 1.5 g of PMMA was dissolved in 20 mL toluene solution in a 100 mL glass beaker with the aid of magnetic stirrer for one hour. Another beaker solution containing 3.0% (0.045 g) weight percent of ZnS nanoparticles dissolved in toluene was slowly added into the beaker containing the PMMA toluene solution with heating and vigorous stirring. The experiment continued for about 30 minutes. The resulting turbid solutions were poured on a Petri dish and allowed to dry in air. The other solution containing PMMA only was also prepared the same way. The same procedure was used for the synthesis of CdS/PMMA and HgS/PMMA nanocomposites. White or light yellow nanocomposites of ZnS/PMMA, CdS/PMMA, and HgS/PMMA were obtained in 85–95%.


## 4. Conclusions

Metal sulfides nanoparticles/PMMA nanocomposites formulated as ZnS/PMMA, CdS/PMMA, and HgS/PMMA were synthesized from their metal sulfides nanoparticles in the presence of poly(methyl methacrylate) matrix. The metal sulfides/PMMA nanocomposites were characterized by infrared spectroscopy, thermal gravimetric analyses, SEM, EDX, and TEM. The FTIR spectra studies confirmed the dispersion of the metal sulfide nanoparticles into PMMA matrices. All the prepared nanocomposites showed reasonably good interactions between the metal sulfides nanoparticles and PMMA. The PMMA acted as good host matrix since it does not affect the shape and properties of the semiconductor metal sulfides nanoparticles dispersed in it but provided combinations of functionalities. The increasing order of particle sizes as calculated from the XRD is ZnS/PMMA < HgS/PMMA < CdS/PMMA and ranges from 1.02 to 1.35 nm. These calculated particle sizes are smaller than the values obtained from TEM which are 4–7 nm for ZnS, 10 nm for CdS, and 8–20 nm for HgS nanoparticles in the PMMA matrices.



---

*Source: 752394-2014-09-07.xml*