# Gecko Crude Peptides Induce Apoptosis in Human Liver Carcinoma CellsIn Vitro and Exert Antitumor Activity in a Mouse Ascites H22 Xenograft Model

Authors: Ying Song; Jian-Gang Wang; Rui-Fang Li; Yan Li; Zhao-Chu Cui; Leng-Xin Duan; Fei Lu
Journal: Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

Aim. To investigate the anti-tumor effects and mechanisms of gecko crude peptides (GCPs) in vitro and in vivo. Methods. 3-(4,5)-dimethylthiahiazo (-z-y1)-3,5-di-phenytetrazoliumromide (MTT) assay was applied to measure the effects of GCPs on the HepG2 cell viability. Fluorescence morphology was used to identify apoptotic cells. A xenograft H22 liver cancer model was established in Kunming mice. The tumor-bearing mice were treated with daily intraperitoneal injections of normal saline (NS group) or GCPs (80, 40 or 20 mg/kg) for 10 days, or once per two days with 2 mg/kg doxorubicin (ADR group; n=10 each). Serum tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) and interleukin (IL)-6 were quantified using ELISA assay. Results. GCPs significantly inhibited the growth of HepG2 cells and induced typical apoptotic morphological features through increasing bcl-2/bax ratio in a dose- and time-dependent manner in vitro. The tumor weights of the ADR group, GCPs (H) group, GCPs (M) group, GCPs (L) group were smaller compared to the NS group. While the white blood cell count, thymus index, spleen index were higher in the high dose GCPs group than the NS group (P<0.05), the VEGF expression in tumor tissue and serum TNF-α and IL-6 levels in the GCPs groups were lower than the NS group (P<0.05).


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Cancer has a major impact on human health. Many current chemotherapeutic drugs are cytotoxic and lead to numerous side effects [1, 2]; therefore, Chinese materia medica is increasingly being used for its antitumor effects. The small peptides from snake venom of Gloydius saxatilis and scorpion venom have antitumor activities and upregulate the immune system in a dose-dependent manner [3–8].Gecko is an animal, which can reduce inflammation, allergic responses swelling [9, 10], with a high activity and low toxicity, which has been used in Chinese medicine for a long time, Gecko has a proven effect against malignant tumors in clinical practice, especially digestive system tumors such as esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, and liver cancer [11–13]. Pharmacological studies reveal that Gecko represents a variety of activities, such as the cytotoxic effects and induction of apoptosis [9, 10]. The aim of this study was to purify and further separate Gecko alcohol extract (GAE) to obtain Gecko crude peptides (GCPs), to investigate the antitumor effect and mechanism of action of GCPs on HepG2 cells in vitro and in a mouse xenograft model of ascites H22 tumors.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Reagents

Whole-driedGekko japonicus (Anhui Bozhou Yonggang Co. Ltd., Bozhou, China) were ground to a fine powder and further separated in Gecko alcohol extract (GAE) to obtain Gecko crude peptides (GCPs), which were then desalted and dialyzed. The human liver carcinoma cell line HepG2 and the H22 mouse cell line were kindly provided by the Medical College of Zhengzhou University; 5-Fluorouracil (5-Fu; batch no. H110911) was purchased from Shanghai Xudong Medicine Co. Ltd, China; doxorubicin (ADR; batch no. H090303A) was purchased from Zhejiang Haizheng Medicine Co. Ltd., China. RPMI-1640 and calf serum were purchased from Invitrogen Inc. (Carlsbad, CA, USA); trypsin, all other cell culture reagents and Hochest 33258 (Batch no. 861405) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Inc. (St. Louis, MO, USA). The antibodies used for Western blotting were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Boston, MA, USA). Fifty female Kunming mice (Code number 0001350) were provided by the Medical Experimental Animal Center, Henan Province, China. The mouse TNF-α and IL-6 ELISA kits were purchased from NeoBioscience Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China. All other reagents, of at least analytical grade purity, were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Inc.


### 2.2.In Vitro Study

#### 2.2.1. Cell Culture

The cells were cultured as monolayers in RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 mg/L streptomycin in humidified air containing 5% CO2 at 37°C.


#### 2.2.2. 3-(4, 5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide (MTT) Assay

Cell growth was measured using a modified MTT assay [14–16]. HepG2 cells in the populations growth were resuspended in 0.02% (w/v) EDTA at 1 × 104 cells/mL, and 180 μL aliquots were plated in 96-well plates and cultured for 24 h. Three groups of six wells were prepared: control group, 5-Fu group (1.3 mg/mL) and the Gecko groups (3, 1.5, 1, 0.75, and 0.375 mg/mL). Each well was treated with 20 μL complete media containing drugs as indicated, incubated for 24, 48, or 72 h, then 20 μL MTT was added to each well and incubated at 37°C for 4 h. The supernatant was removed, 200 μL DMSO was added to each well to solubilize the formazan product, then the absorbance (A; aka the OD value) was measured at 470 nm using a microplate reader (Sigma). Triplicate experiments were performed in a parallel manner for each concentration and the mean ± SD values were calculated. The cell inhibitory rate (IR%) was calculated as IR% = (1-A treated/A control) × 100%.


#### 2.2.3. Morphological Assessment and Quantification of Apoptotic Cells

Variations in cell morphology were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. Cells attached to coverslips were fixed in cold methanol for 5 min, air dried, and stained with Hoechst 33258 (2.5 mg/mL in distilled water) for 2 min [14, 15]. Microscopic observations were carried out using an Olympus BX41 microscope and photographs were taken with an Olympus A640 digital camera.


#### 2.2.4. Western Blotting

HepG2 cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 105 cells/mL in 25 cm2 culture flasks, incubated with different concentrations of GCPs for 48 h, washed twice in ice-cold PBS, and harvested by scraping into 1 mL Tris-Tricine-SDS buffer. Tumor tissues were homogenized in lysis buffer containing proteinase inhibitors.Western blotting was performed as previously described [14, 17, 18]. Briefly, after protein quantitation using a modified Bradford assay, 80 μg protein was boiled in loading buffer and then loaded onto gradient sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gels. Following electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane at 100 V/350 mA for 60 min. The anti-bcl-2 and anti-bax polyclonal antibody were used as primary antibody. The antibody exhibits immunoreactivity against both the full-length and the cleaved fragment of bcl-2 and bax. For detection of VEGF, monoclonal VEGF antibody was used. Images were analyzed with Gel Analyzer (Media Cybernetics, USA).


### 2.3.In Vivo Study

#### 2.3.1. Establishment of the H22 Xenograft Model

The H22 model was established by subcutaneous injection as previously described [13]. Briefly, H22 mouse cells were harvested with ascites, diluted 1 : 8 in sterile saline, the cell concentration was adjusted to 1.0 × 106 cells/mL, and the cells were subcutaneously inoculated into the right armpit region of Kunming mice (n=50; 8–10 weeks old, weighing 22±2 g). In the experiment, the mouse was anesthetized by ether. All experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the Guide lines of Animal Experiments from the Committee of Medical Ethics, National Health Department of China (1998).


#### 2.3.2. Inhibitory Effect of GCPs on H22 Tumor Xenografts

Twenty-four hours after establishment of the H22 model, the transplanted mice were randomly divided into five groups: the normal saline (NS) group, the ADR group (ADR is frequently used as a positive control as it has a cytotoxic effect against mouse H22 [9, 10, 13]) and the Gecko groups. The mice were treated with a daily peritoneal injection of saline, single peritoneal injection of 100 mg/kg ADR, or daily peritoneal injection of 80, 40, or 20 mg/kg GCPs. After 10 days, the antitumor activity was evaluated by weighing the tumor tissues. The tumor inhibitory rate (%) was calculated as (1-average tumor weight/average tumor weight of NS group) × 100%.


#### 2.3.3. Immune Function Analysis

Blood was collected from the mouse eye orbit, followed by diluted with 2% acetate (acetic acid), and the white blood cell count was determined by microscopy. The thymus and spleen were taken from the mice and the impact of the treatments on immune organ function was evaluated using the thymus index and spleen index [9]. Spleen index = spleen weight(g)/body weight(10 g) × 100%, thymus index = thymus weight(g)/body weight(10 g) × 100%.


#### 2.3.4. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

The serum was diluted to different concentrations and analyzed using the mouse TNF-α and IL-6 ELISA kits, following the manufacturer’s instructions.


### 2.4. Statistical Analysis

Unless otherwise indicated, all experiments were repeated at least three times and the differences were determined by the two-tailed Student’st-test. When the statistical differences between more than two groups were analyzed, a one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test was performed. Results were presented as means ± standard deviations (SDs) of three independent experiments. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.


## 2.1. Reagents

Whole-driedGekko japonicus (Anhui Bozhou Yonggang Co. Ltd., Bozhou, China) were ground to a fine powder and further separated in Gecko alcohol extract (GAE) to obtain Gecko crude peptides (GCPs), which were then desalted and dialyzed. The human liver carcinoma cell line HepG2 and the H22 mouse cell line were kindly provided by the Medical College of Zhengzhou University; 5-Fluorouracil (5-Fu; batch no. H110911) was purchased from Shanghai Xudong Medicine Co. Ltd, China; doxorubicin (ADR; batch no. H090303A) was purchased from Zhejiang Haizheng Medicine Co. Ltd., China. RPMI-1640 and calf serum were purchased from Invitrogen Inc. (Carlsbad, CA, USA); trypsin, all other cell culture reagents and Hochest 33258 (Batch no. 861405) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Inc. (St. Louis, MO, USA). The antibodies used for Western blotting were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Boston, MA, USA). Fifty female Kunming mice (Code number 0001350) were provided by the Medical Experimental Animal Center, Henan Province, China. The mouse TNF-α and IL-6 ELISA kits were purchased from NeoBioscience Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China. All other reagents, of at least analytical grade purity, were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Inc.


## 2.2.In Vitro Study

### 2.2.1. Cell Culture

The cells were cultured as monolayers in RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 mg/L streptomycin in humidified air containing 5% CO2 at 37°C.


### 2.2.2. 3-(4, 5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide (MTT) Assay

Cell growth was measured using a modified MTT assay [14–16]. HepG2 cells in the populations growth were resuspended in 0.02% (w/v) EDTA at 1 × 104 cells/mL, and 180 μL aliquots were plated in 96-well plates and cultured for 24 h. Three groups of six wells were prepared: control group, 5-Fu group (1.3 mg/mL) and the Gecko groups (3, 1.5, 1, 0.75, and 0.375 mg/mL). Each well was treated with 20 μL complete media containing drugs as indicated, incubated for 24, 48, or 72 h, then 20 μL MTT was added to each well and incubated at 37°C for 4 h. The supernatant was removed, 200 μL DMSO was added to each well to solubilize the formazan product, then the absorbance (A; aka the OD value) was measured at 470 nm using a microplate reader (Sigma). Triplicate experiments were performed in a parallel manner for each concentration and the mean ± SD values were calculated. The cell inhibitory rate (IR%) was calculated as IR% = (1-A treated/A control) × 100%.


### 2.2.3. Morphological Assessment and Quantification of Apoptotic Cells

Variations in cell morphology were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. Cells attached to coverslips were fixed in cold methanol for 5 min, air dried, and stained with Hoechst 33258 (2.5 mg/mL in distilled water) for 2 min [14, 15]. Microscopic observations were carried out using an Olympus BX41 microscope and photographs were taken with an Olympus A640 digital camera.


### 2.2.4. Western Blotting

HepG2 cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 105 cells/mL in 25 cm2 culture flasks, incubated with different concentrations of GCPs for 48 h, washed twice in ice-cold PBS, and harvested by scraping into 1 mL Tris-Tricine-SDS buffer. Tumor tissues were homogenized in lysis buffer containing proteinase inhibitors.Western blotting was performed as previously described [14, 17, 18]. Briefly, after protein quantitation using a modified Bradford assay, 80 μg protein was boiled in loading buffer and then loaded onto gradient sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gels. Following electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane at 100 V/350 mA for 60 min. The anti-bcl-2 and anti-bax polyclonal antibody were used as primary antibody. The antibody exhibits immunoreactivity against both the full-length and the cleaved fragment of bcl-2 and bax. For detection of VEGF, monoclonal VEGF antibody was used. Images were analyzed with Gel Analyzer (Media Cybernetics, USA).


## 2.2.1. Cell Culture

The cells were cultured as monolayers in RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 mg/L streptomycin in humidified air containing 5% CO2 at 37°C.


## 2.2.2. 3-(4, 5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide (MTT) Assay

Cell growth was measured using a modified MTT assay [14–16]. HepG2 cells in the populations growth were resuspended in 0.02% (w/v) EDTA at 1 × 104 cells/mL, and 180 μL aliquots were plated in 96-well plates and cultured for 24 h. Three groups of six wells were prepared: control group, 5-Fu group (1.3 mg/mL) and the Gecko groups (3, 1.5, 1, 0.75, and 0.375 mg/mL). Each well was treated with 20 μL complete media containing drugs as indicated, incubated for 24, 48, or 72 h, then 20 μL MTT was added to each well and incubated at 37°C for 4 h. The supernatant was removed, 200 μL DMSO was added to each well to solubilize the formazan product, then the absorbance (A; aka the OD value) was measured at 470 nm using a microplate reader (Sigma). Triplicate experiments were performed in a parallel manner for each concentration and the mean ± SD values were calculated. The cell inhibitory rate (IR%) was calculated as IR% = (1-A treated/A control) × 100%.


## 2.2.3. Morphological Assessment and Quantification of Apoptotic Cells

Variations in cell morphology were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. Cells attached to coverslips were fixed in cold methanol for 5 min, air dried, and stained with Hoechst 33258 (2.5 mg/mL in distilled water) for 2 min [14, 15]. Microscopic observations were carried out using an Olympus BX41 microscope and photographs were taken with an Olympus A640 digital camera.


## 2.2.4. Western Blotting

HepG2 cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 105 cells/mL in 25 cm2 culture flasks, incubated with different concentrations of GCPs for 48 h, washed twice in ice-cold PBS, and harvested by scraping into 1 mL Tris-Tricine-SDS buffer. Tumor tissues were homogenized in lysis buffer containing proteinase inhibitors.Western blotting was performed as previously described [14, 17, 18]. Briefly, after protein quantitation using a modified Bradford assay, 80 μg protein was boiled in loading buffer and then loaded onto gradient sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gels. Following electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane at 100 V/350 mA for 60 min. The anti-bcl-2 and anti-bax polyclonal antibody were used as primary antibody. The antibody exhibits immunoreactivity against both the full-length and the cleaved fragment of bcl-2 and bax. For detection of VEGF, monoclonal VEGF antibody was used. Images were analyzed with Gel Analyzer (Media Cybernetics, USA).


## 2.3.In Vivo Study

### 2.3.1. Establishment of the H22 Xenograft Model

The H22 model was established by subcutaneous injection as previously described [13]. Briefly, H22 mouse cells were harvested with ascites, diluted 1 : 8 in sterile saline, the cell concentration was adjusted to 1.0 × 106 cells/mL, and the cells were subcutaneously inoculated into the right armpit region of Kunming mice (n=50; 8–10 weeks old, weighing 22±2 g). In the experiment, the mouse was anesthetized by ether. All experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the Guide lines of Animal Experiments from the Committee of Medical Ethics, National Health Department of China (1998).


### 2.3.2. Inhibitory Effect of GCPs on H22 Tumor Xenografts

Twenty-four hours after establishment of the H22 model, the transplanted mice were randomly divided into five groups: the normal saline (NS) group, the ADR group (ADR is frequently used as a positive control as it has a cytotoxic effect against mouse H22 [9, 10, 13]) and the Gecko groups. The mice were treated with a daily peritoneal injection of saline, single peritoneal injection of 100 mg/kg ADR, or daily peritoneal injection of 80, 40, or 20 mg/kg GCPs. After 10 days, the antitumor activity was evaluated by weighing the tumor tissues. The tumor inhibitory rate (%) was calculated as (1-average tumor weight/average tumor weight of NS group) × 100%.


### 2.3.3. Immune Function Analysis

Blood was collected from the mouse eye orbit, followed by diluted with 2% acetate (acetic acid), and the white blood cell count was determined by microscopy. The thymus and spleen were taken from the mice and the impact of the treatments on immune organ function was evaluated using the thymus index and spleen index [9]. Spleen index = spleen weight(g)/body weight(10 g) × 100%, thymus index = thymus weight(g)/body weight(10 g) × 100%.


### 2.3.4. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

The serum was diluted to different concentrations and analyzed using the mouse TNF-α and IL-6 ELISA kits, following the manufacturer’s instructions.


## 2.3.1. Establishment of the H22 Xenograft Model

The H22 model was established by subcutaneous injection as previously described [13]. Briefly, H22 mouse cells were harvested with ascites, diluted 1 : 8 in sterile saline, the cell concentration was adjusted to 1.0 × 106 cells/mL, and the cells were subcutaneously inoculated into the right armpit region of Kunming mice (n=50; 8–10 weeks old, weighing 22±2 g). In the experiment, the mouse was anesthetized by ether. All experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the Guide lines of Animal Experiments from the Committee of Medical Ethics, National Health Department of China (1998).


## 2.3.2. Inhibitory Effect of GCPs on H22 Tumor Xenografts

Twenty-four hours after establishment of the H22 model, the transplanted mice were randomly divided into five groups: the normal saline (NS) group, the ADR group (ADR is frequently used as a positive control as it has a cytotoxic effect against mouse H22 [9, 10, 13]) and the Gecko groups. The mice were treated with a daily peritoneal injection of saline, single peritoneal injection of 100 mg/kg ADR, or daily peritoneal injection of 80, 40, or 20 mg/kg GCPs. After 10 days, the antitumor activity was evaluated by weighing the tumor tissues. The tumor inhibitory rate (%) was calculated as (1-average tumor weight/average tumor weight of NS group) × 100%.


## 2.3.3. Immune Function Analysis

Blood was collected from the mouse eye orbit, followed by diluted with 2% acetate (acetic acid), and the white blood cell count was determined by microscopy. The thymus and spleen were taken from the mice and the impact of the treatments on immune organ function was evaluated using the thymus index and spleen index [9]. Spleen index = spleen weight(g)/body weight(10 g) × 100%, thymus index = thymus weight(g)/body weight(10 g) × 100%.


## 2.3.4. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

The serum was diluted to different concentrations and analyzed using the mouse TNF-α and IL-6 ELISA kits, following the manufacturer’s instructions.


## 2.4. Statistical Analysis

Unless otherwise indicated, all experiments were repeated at least three times and the differences were determined by the two-tailed Student’st-test. When the statistical differences between more than two groups were analyzed, a one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test was performed. Results were presented as means ± standard deviations (SDs) of three independent experiments. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. GCPs Inhibit HepG2 Cell Proliferation

Compared with the control group, the growth of HepG2 cells treated with GCPs was significantly inhibited in a time- and dose-dependent manner (P<0.05; Table 1). After 48 h treatment, the inhibitory rates for GCPs ranged from 12%–63%.Table 1
Inhibition effect of Gecko-contained serum on HepG2 by MTT assay (mean ± SD,n=12).
Groups
Dose
24 h
48 h
72 h
mg/mL
A
IR%
A
IR%
A
IR%
NS
0.42 ± 0.12
—
0.63 ± 0.02
—
0.95 ± 0.10
—
5-FU
1.3
0.20 ± 0.03*
53
0.14 ± 0.04*
77
0.07 ± 0.02**
92
GCPs
3
0.16 ± 0.06*
63
0.13 ± 0.03**
76
0.08 ± 0.10**
91
1.5
0.24 ± 0.01*
42
0.26 ± 0.01**
57
0.27 ± 0.04**
78
1
0.29 ± 0.02*
30
0.31 ± 0.03**
46
0.38 ± 0.06**
69
0.75
0.32 ± 0.02*
23
0.37 ± 0.04**
31
0.39 ± 0.04**
58
0.375
0.37 ± 0.02*
12
0.40 ± 0.02
25
0.45 ± 0.01**
43
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus control.


### 3.2. GCPs Induce Apoptosis in HepG2 Cells

As shown in Figure1. The NS group did not display any morphological features of apoptosis (Figure 1(a)). The typical changes associated with apoptotic cells appeared in GCPs-treated cells after 48 h incubation, the nuclei of apoptotic cells showed significant apoptosis in 1.6 and 0.8 mg/mL GCPs-treated cells (Figures 1(c) and 1(d)).Figure 1
Hoechst-stained nuclei of apoptotic myocytes were analyzed morphologically and were expressed as the percentage of total nuclei (magnification ×400). (a) NS control group; (b) 1.3 mg/mL 5-Fu; (c) GCPs (H): 1.6 mg/mL GCPs; (d) GCPs(L): 0.8 mg/mL GCPs. The percentage rate of apoptotic cells was presented in bar graph. The data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. *P<0.05 versus control. #P<0.05 versus 5-FU.


### 3.3. GCPs Decrease the Bcl-2 and Bax Ratio in HepG2 Cells

As shown in Figure2, compared to the NS group, bcl-2 protein expression decreased in the 1.6 mg/mL or 0.8 mg/mL GCPs-treated group; however, bax protein expression was increased in 1.6 mg/mL or 0.8 mg/mL GCPs. Therefore, GCPs increased the bcl-2/bax ratio in HepG2 cells.Figure 2
Effects of GCPs on the expressions of bcl-2 and bax protein in HepG2 cells. Lane (a): control; Lane (b): 5-Fu (1.3 mg/mL); Lane (c): GCPs (1.6 mg/mL); Lane (d): GCPs (0.8 mg/mL). *P<0.05 versus Control.


### 3.4. GCPs Exert Antitumor Effects on H22 Xenograft Tumors in Mice

As shown in Table2, compared to NS groups, the tumors weight decreased in the GCPs and ADR groups (P<0.01; Table 2). The tumor weights in the GCPs groups (80, 40, and 20 mg/kg) were not significantly different to the ADR group (1.0±0.38 g). The tumor inhibitory rates of the ADR and GCPs groups were 53.8%, 54.6%, and 24.8%, respectively.Table 2
Inhibitory effects of Gecko on transplanted H22 mice (mean ± SD,n=10).
Groups
Dosage(mg/kg)
Tumor weight(g)
Inhibitory rate(%)
NS
0
2.2 ± 0.45
—
ADR
2
1.0 ± 0.38
53.8**
GCPs (H)
80
0.98 ± 0.6
54.6**
GCPs (M)
40
1.6 ± 0.41
24.8*
GCPs (L)
20
1.8 ± 0.85
16.6
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus control.


### 3.5. GCPs Improve the Immune Function of Mice Bearing H22 Xenograft Tumors

As shown in Table3, the white blood cell count, spleen index, and thymus index of mice in the 80 mg/kg GCPs and ADR groups were significantly lower than the NS group (P>0.05); however, there was no significant difference between the NS group and the 40 mg/mL or 20 mg/mL GCPs groups. Compared to the NS group, the body weight of the ADR group was significantly decreased (P<0.01; Table 3).Table 3
Influence of Gecko on immune organs of transplanted H22 in mice (mean ± SD,n=10).
Groups
Dosage(mg/kg)
Body weight(g)
White blood cell count(×109/L)
Spleen index(mg/10 g)
Thymus index(mg/10 g)
NS
0
29.35 ± 3.2
7.86 ± 2.1
81.3 ± 12.5
14.7 ± 0.5
ADR
2
23.18 ± 3.6**
6.04 ± 2.3
65.3 ± 11. 8
9.4 ± 0.4**
GCPs (H)
80
26.13 ± 2.5*
9.88 ± 0.8*
117.1 ± 10.6*
21.6 ± 0.4**
GCPs (M)
40
26.71 ± 1.8
8.11 ± 3.16
99.8 ± 15.4
20.9 ± 0.7**
GCPs (L)
20
27.68 ± 2.7
7.06 ± 1.64
92.7 ± 11.6
17.5 ± 0.6*
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus control.


### 3.6. GCPs Downregulate Expression of VEGF in H22 Xenograft Tumors

As shown in Figure3, VEGF expression significantly increased in NS group, GCPs decreased VEGF protein expression in a dose-dependent manner in xenograft tumor tissues.Figure 3
Effects of GCPs on the expression of VEGF protein in the tumor tissue. Lane (a): control; Lane (b): ADR (2 mg/kg); Lane (c): GCPs (80 mg/kg); Lane (d): GCPs (40 mg/kg); Lane (e): GCPs (20 mg/kg). *P<0.05, **P<0.01 versus Control; #P<0.01 versus ADR.


### 3.7. GCPs Reduce the Serum Levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in Mice Bearing H22 Xenograft Tumors

As shown in Table4, the serum levels of TNF-α and IL-6 were lower in the GCPs groups and ADR group than the NS group (P<0.05). The serum levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in the GCPs groups and ADR group were not significantly different.Table 4
Effects of GCPS on the expressions of TNF- and IL-6 protein in the tumor tissue.
Groups
Dosage(mg/kg)
TNF-α(pg/mL)
IL-6(pg/mL)
NS
0
68.51 ± 2.43
75.83 ± 1.74
ADR
2
32.15 ± 3.24**
48.36 ± 4.32**
GCPs (H)
80
34.62 ± 4.51**
50.78 ± 5.34**
GCPs (M)
40
46.81 ± 6.34**
56.37 ± 3.61**
GCPs (L)
20
60.66 ± 7.83*
63.28 ± 3.23**
**P< 0.01, *P < 0.05 versus control.


## 3.1. GCPs Inhibit HepG2 Cell Proliferation

Compared with the control group, the growth of HepG2 cells treated with GCPs was significantly inhibited in a time- and dose-dependent manner (P<0.05; Table 1). After 48 h treatment, the inhibitory rates for GCPs ranged from 12%–63%.Table 1
Inhibition effect of Gecko-contained serum on HepG2 by MTT assay (mean ± SD,n=12).
Groups
Dose
24 h
48 h
72 h
mg/mL
A
IR%
A
IR%
A
IR%
NS
0.42 ± 0.12
—
0.63 ± 0.02
—
0.95 ± 0.10
—
5-FU
1.3
0.20 ± 0.03*
53
0.14 ± 0.04*
77
0.07 ± 0.02**
92
GCPs
3
0.16 ± 0.06*
63
0.13 ± 0.03**
76
0.08 ± 0.10**
91
1.5
0.24 ± 0.01*
42
0.26 ± 0.01**
57
0.27 ± 0.04**
78
1
0.29 ± 0.02*
30
0.31 ± 0.03**
46
0.38 ± 0.06**
69
0.75
0.32 ± 0.02*
23
0.37 ± 0.04**
31
0.39 ± 0.04**
58
0.375
0.37 ± 0.02*
12
0.40 ± 0.02
25
0.45 ± 0.01**
43
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus control.


## 3.2. GCPs Induce Apoptosis in HepG2 Cells

As shown in Figure1. The NS group did not display any morphological features of apoptosis (Figure 1(a)). The typical changes associated with apoptotic cells appeared in GCPs-treated cells after 48 h incubation, the nuclei of apoptotic cells showed significant apoptosis in 1.6 and 0.8 mg/mL GCPs-treated cells (Figures 1(c) and 1(d)).Figure 1
Hoechst-stained nuclei of apoptotic myocytes were analyzed morphologically and were expressed as the percentage of total nuclei (magnification ×400). (a) NS control group; (b) 1.3 mg/mL 5-Fu; (c) GCPs (H): 1.6 mg/mL GCPs; (d) GCPs(L): 0.8 mg/mL GCPs. The percentage rate of apoptotic cells was presented in bar graph. The data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. *P<0.05 versus control. #P<0.05 versus 5-FU.


## 3.3. GCPs Decrease the Bcl-2 and Bax Ratio in HepG2 Cells

As shown in Figure2, compared to the NS group, bcl-2 protein expression decreased in the 1.6 mg/mL or 0.8 mg/mL GCPs-treated group; however, bax protein expression was increased in 1.6 mg/mL or 0.8 mg/mL GCPs. Therefore, GCPs increased the bcl-2/bax ratio in HepG2 cells.Figure 2
Effects of GCPs on the expressions of bcl-2 and bax protein in HepG2 cells. Lane (a): control; Lane (b): 5-Fu (1.3 mg/mL); Lane (c): GCPs (1.6 mg/mL); Lane (d): GCPs (0.8 mg/mL). *P<0.05 versus Control.


## 3.4. GCPs Exert Antitumor Effects on H22 Xenograft Tumors in Mice

As shown in Table2, compared to NS groups, the tumors weight decreased in the GCPs and ADR groups (P<0.01; Table 2). The tumor weights in the GCPs groups (80, 40, and 20 mg/kg) were not significantly different to the ADR group (1.0±0.38 g). The tumor inhibitory rates of the ADR and GCPs groups were 53.8%, 54.6%, and 24.8%, respectively.Table 2
Inhibitory effects of Gecko on transplanted H22 mice (mean ± SD,n=10).
Groups
Dosage(mg/kg)
Tumor weight(g)
Inhibitory rate(%)
NS
0
2.2 ± 0.45
—
ADR
2
1.0 ± 0.38
53.8**
GCPs (H)
80
0.98 ± 0.6
54.6**
GCPs (M)
40
1.6 ± 0.41
24.8*
GCPs (L)
20
1.8 ± 0.85
16.6
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus control.


## 3.5. GCPs Improve the Immune Function of Mice Bearing H22 Xenograft Tumors

As shown in Table3, the white blood cell count, spleen index, and thymus index of mice in the 80 mg/kg GCPs and ADR groups were significantly lower than the NS group (P>0.05); however, there was no significant difference between the NS group and the 40 mg/mL or 20 mg/mL GCPs groups. Compared to the NS group, the body weight of the ADR group was significantly decreased (P<0.01; Table 3).Table 3
Influence of Gecko on immune organs of transplanted H22 in mice (mean ± SD,n=10).
Groups
Dosage(mg/kg)
Body weight(g)
White blood cell count(×109/L)
Spleen index(mg/10 g)
Thymus index(mg/10 g)
NS
0
29.35 ± 3.2
7.86 ± 2.1
81.3 ± 12.5
14.7 ± 0.5
ADR
2
23.18 ± 3.6**
6.04 ± 2.3
65.3 ± 11. 8
9.4 ± 0.4**
GCPs (H)
80
26.13 ± 2.5*
9.88 ± 0.8*
117.1 ± 10.6*
21.6 ± 0.4**
GCPs (M)
40
26.71 ± 1.8
8.11 ± 3.16
99.8 ± 15.4
20.9 ± 0.7**
GCPs (L)
20
27.68 ± 2.7
7.06 ± 1.64
92.7 ± 11.6
17.5 ± 0.6*
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus control.


## 3.6. GCPs Downregulate Expression of VEGF in H22 Xenograft Tumors

As shown in Figure3, VEGF expression significantly increased in NS group, GCPs decreased VEGF protein expression in a dose-dependent manner in xenograft tumor tissues.Figure 3
Effects of GCPs on the expression of VEGF protein in the tumor tissue. Lane (a): control; Lane (b): ADR (2 mg/kg); Lane (c): GCPs (80 mg/kg); Lane (d): GCPs (40 mg/kg); Lane (e): GCPs (20 mg/kg). *P<0.05, **P<0.01 versus Control; #P<0.01 versus ADR.


## 3.7. GCPs Reduce the Serum Levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in Mice Bearing H22 Xenograft Tumors

As shown in Table4, the serum levels of TNF-α and IL-6 were lower in the GCPs groups and ADR group than the NS group (P<0.05). The serum levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in the GCPs groups and ADR group were not significantly different.Table 4
Effects of GCPS on the expressions of TNF- and IL-6 protein in the tumor tissue.
Groups
Dosage(mg/kg)
TNF-α(pg/mL)
IL-6(pg/mL)
NS
0
68.51 ± 2.43
75.83 ± 1.74
ADR
2
32.15 ± 3.24**
48.36 ± 4.32**
GCPs (H)
80
34.62 ± 4.51**
50.78 ± 5.34**
GCPs (M)
40
46.81 ± 6.34**
56.37 ± 3.61**
GCPs (L)
20
60.66 ± 7.83*
63.28 ± 3.23**
**P< 0.01, *P < 0.05 versus control.


## 4. Discussion

A growing number of studies have revealed that the small-molecule peptides, extracted from animals, exert antitumor effects [3, 4]. In recent years, researchers have emphasized to the antitumor activity of natural polypeptide extracts. Natural peptides can be extracted from animals, microorganisms, and other organisms using special extraction and separation processes, and in vitro or in vivo experiments have demonstrated that many of these substances have significant antitumor activity [3, 4]. Compared with conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy, polypeptides with natural antitumor activity have the advantages of a low-molecular weight, high activity, few side effects, and they do not usually induce drug resistance easily [3, 4]. The aim of this study was to further separate and purify Gecko alcohol extract (GAE) to obtain Gecko crude peptides (GCPs), in order to investigate the antitumor effect and mechanism of action of GCPs on HepG2 cells in vitro and in vivo.In this study, we observed that GCPs inhibited the proliferation of HepG2 cells in a time, and dose-dependent manner with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 1.2 mg/mL. Two major apoptotic signaling pathways are the death receptor (extrinsic) and mitochondrial (intrinsic) pathways, which can crosstalk to each other [16, 19–23]. The bcl-2 family members appear to regulate the commitment to survive or die by controlling the integrity of mitochondrial membrane [24]. HepG2 cells treated with GCPs displayed the morphological features of apoptosis, including dense, strong blue fluorescence under fluorescence microscopy. Additionally, GCPs at a concentration of 0.8 and 1.6 mg/mL increased the bcl-2/bax ratio in HepG2 cells. These results indicate that GCPs can induce apoptosis in HepG2 cells in vitro by increasing the bcl-2/bax ratio. Therefore, GCPs are a potentially effective antitumor agent.This study also demonstrated that GCPs could significantly inhibit the growth of H22 xenograft tumorsin vivo and were similarly effective to ADR. GCPs also had beneficial effects on the immune system of the mice-bearing tumors and did not affect the weight of the mice, indicating that GCPs are nontoxic with few side effects. Additionally, GCPs significantly decreased the VEGF protein expression levels in the xenograft tumors and the lowered the serum levels of TNF-α and IL-6, suggesting that GCPs can inhibit tumor angiogenesis and tumor growth. Taken together, this study illustrates that GCPs exert a significant anticancer effect in vivo.



---

*Source: 743573-2012-10-03.xml*