# Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptorγ Regulates the Expression of Lipid Phosphate Phosphohydrolase 1 in Human Vascular Endothelial Cells

Authors: Yazi Huang; Beilei Zhao; Yahan Liu; Nanping Wang
Journal: PPAR Research
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

Lipid phosphate phosphohydrolase 1 (LPP1), a membrane ectophosphohydrolase regulating the availability of bioactive lipid phosphates, plays important roles in cellular signaling and physiological processes such as angiogenesis and endothelial migration. However, the regulated expression of LPP1 remains largely unknown. Here, we aimed to examine a role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptorγ (PPARγ) in the transcriptional control of LPP1 gene expression. In human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) demonstrated that activation of PPARγ increased the mRNA level of LPP1. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay showed that PPARγ binds to the putative PPAR-responsive elements (PPREs) within the 5′-flanking region of the human LPP1 gene. Genomic fragment containing 1.7-kilobase of the promoter region was cloned by using PCR. The luciferase reporter assays demonstrated that overexpression of PPARγ and rosiglitazone, a specific ligand for PPARγ, could significantly upregulate the reporter activity. However, site-directed mutagenesis of the PPRE motif abolished the induction. In conclusion, our results demonstrated that PPARγ transcriptionally activated the expression of LPP1 gene in ECs, suggesting a potential role of PPARγ in the metabolism of phospholipids.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Lipid phosphate phosphohydrolases (LPPs), also known as phosphatidate phosphohydrolase-2 (PAP-2), are the Mg2+-independent and N-ethylmaleimide-insensitive N-glycosylated integral membrane ectophosphohydrolase [1, 2]. LPPs catalyze the dephosphorylation of a range of lipid phosphates, such as lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) [3, 4]. Extracellular LPA and S1P bind to the G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and exert a number of pathophysiological actions, such as angiogenesis, platelet activation, inflammation, smooth muscle cells (SMCs) proliferation and migration, and cardiovascular remodeling [4, 5]. LPPs hydrolyze these lipid phosphates to terminate their signaling actions or generate new signaling molecules [6]. Three isoforms of LPPs (LPP1, LPP2, and LPP3) have been found [7]. LPP1 negatively regulates lysophospholipid signalings by degrading the bioactive lysophospholipids released from platelets and modulates their effects on the cell proliferation, migration, inflammation, coagulation, and wound healing [5, 6]. The activity of LPP1 is mainly regulated through de novo expression rather than posttranslational modification such as phosphorylation. Expression ofLPP1 was induced by androgens in human prostatic adenocarcinoma cells and decreased in ovarian cancers [8, 9]. However, transcriptional mechanism underlying the regulation expression of theLPP1 remains largely unclear.Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are a family of ligand-activated nuclear receptors and transcription factors [10]. Among three PPAR isoforms (α, β/δ, and γ), PPARγ is predominantly expressed in adipose tissue and also in vasculature including vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and endothelial cells (ECs) [11, 12]. PPARγ forms a heterodimer with RXR and binds to the PPAR response elements (PPREs) in the promoter region of target genes [13]. When activated by various natural and synthetic ligands such as prostaglandin metabolite 15d-PGJ2 [14] and the insulin sensitizer rosiglitazone [15], PPARγ transactivates the gene expression and regulates adipogenesis [16] and insulin response [17]. In addition, PPARγ possesses antiatherogenic and anti-inflammatory actions in ECs [18, 19]. Therefore, we attempted to examine a role of PPARγ in the regulation ofLPP1 gene expression in ECs.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Cell Culture and Reagents

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were cultured as previously described [20]. Bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAECs) were harvested from bovine aorta and maintained in DMEM with 10% FBS [21]. Rosiglitazone, GW501516, and GW9662 were obtained from Cayman Chemical. Polyclonal rabbit anti-PPARγ and rabbit IgG were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Luciferase assay reagent, MMLV reverse transcriptase, Taq polymerase, restriction enzymes (XhoI, NheI), and DNA ligase were from Promega Corporation. Lipofectamine 2000 and Trizol reagent were obtained from Invitrogen. The QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit was from Stratagene Corporation.


### 2.2. Adenoviral Infection

Cells were infected with adenoviruses encoding the wild type human PPARα, β/δ, or γ1 (Ad-WT-PPARα or Ad-WT-PPARβ/δ, Ad-WT-PPARγ) together with Ad-tTA, which encodes a tetracycline-responsive transactivator. These viral constructs were previously described and used at 50 multiplicities of infection [22, 23]. Infected cells were maintained in the presence or absence of tetracycline (0.1 μg/mL, a tet-off expression) for 48 hours as described [20].


### 2.3. RNA Extraction and Real-Time Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted with Trizol reagent and reverse transcribed into cDNA with M-MLV reverse transcriptase with oligo-dT as a primer. Real-time PCR was performed with SYBR-green dye and Taq polymerase in the DNA Engine Opticon real-time system (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.). GAPDH was used as an internal control. The primer sequences are: LPP1 5′-TCAACTGCAGCGATGGTTAC (forward), 5′-GCCCACATAAATGGATACGG (reverse); GAPDH 5′-ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC (forward), 5′-TCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA (reverse).


### 2.4. Plasmids, Mutation, Transfection, and Reporter Assay

The genomic fragment containing −1921 to −221 bp upstream of the transcription start site of humanLPP1 gene was PCR amplified from human genomic DNA with the primers (5′-CTTGATAGTACAACAGGGTCA and 5′-TCAGGTGGTCTCCGAACT) with flanking sites of NheI and XhoI. The amplified product was subcloned into the pGL3-basic luciferase vector to generate the pGL3/LPP1-luc. The Quickchange site-directed mutagenesis kit was used to generate the pGL3/mLPP1-luc by disruption of the putative PPRE site (from −624 to −611 bp) with the use of the mutagenic primers: 5′-GAGGGATTCTGGCTAAAGGCG(A)GT(G)TCCC(AA) GGT(G)CTTCTACAAC and 5′-GTTGTAGAAGA(C)CCGG(TT) GAA(C)CC(T)GCCTTTAGCCAGAATCCCTC. The plasmids were transfected together with the pRSV-β-gal plasmid into BAECs by using Lipofectamine 2000. Luciferase activity was measured with the luciferase assay kit and normalized with β-galactosidase activity.


### 2.5. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation

HUVECs were infected with Ad-WT-PPARγ and, 48 h later, cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde. The sheared chromatin DNAs were immunoreacted with 2 μg anti-PPARγ antibody (or IgG as negative control) and precipitated with protein A/G sepharose beads. The eluted immunoprecipitates were digested with proteinase K. DNA was amplified by qPCR with the primers flanking the putative PPREs. The primers for ChIP assay were shown in Table 1.Table 1
The sequences of the primers for ChIP assay.
hLPP1  PPRE1
5′-AGGTGACGGTGGATGGAA-3′
5′-CCTTTGTTGTAGAAGCCCTT-3′
hLPP1  PPRE2
5′-AGGGCTTCTACAACAAAGG-3′
5′-ATCATCCATCCTCGATACCT-3′
hLPP1  PPRE3
5′-CGAGGATGGATGATTTAGCA-3′
5′-GAGCCCTTTCTCACTTAGG-3′


### 2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments. Statistical analyses were performed by using one-way ANOVA. TheP values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.


## 2.1. Cell Culture and Reagents

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were cultured as previously described [20]. Bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAECs) were harvested from bovine aorta and maintained in DMEM with 10% FBS [21]. Rosiglitazone, GW501516, and GW9662 were obtained from Cayman Chemical. Polyclonal rabbit anti-PPARγ and rabbit IgG were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Luciferase assay reagent, MMLV reverse transcriptase, Taq polymerase, restriction enzymes (XhoI, NheI), and DNA ligase were from Promega Corporation. Lipofectamine 2000 and Trizol reagent were obtained from Invitrogen. The QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit was from Stratagene Corporation.


## 2.2. Adenoviral Infection

Cells were infected with adenoviruses encoding the wild type human PPARα, β/δ, or γ1 (Ad-WT-PPARα or Ad-WT-PPARβ/δ, Ad-WT-PPARγ) together with Ad-tTA, which encodes a tetracycline-responsive transactivator. These viral constructs were previously described and used at 50 multiplicities of infection [22, 23]. Infected cells were maintained in the presence or absence of tetracycline (0.1 μg/mL, a tet-off expression) for 48 hours as described [20].


## 2.3. RNA Extraction and Real-Time Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted with Trizol reagent and reverse transcribed into cDNA with M-MLV reverse transcriptase with oligo-dT as a primer. Real-time PCR was performed with SYBR-green dye and Taq polymerase in the DNA Engine Opticon real-time system (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.). GAPDH was used as an internal control. The primer sequences are: LPP1 5′-TCAACTGCAGCGATGGTTAC (forward), 5′-GCCCACATAAATGGATACGG (reverse); GAPDH 5′-ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC (forward), 5′-TCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA (reverse).


## 2.4. Plasmids, Mutation, Transfection, and Reporter Assay

The genomic fragment containing −1921 to −221 bp upstream of the transcription start site of humanLPP1 gene was PCR amplified from human genomic DNA with the primers (5′-CTTGATAGTACAACAGGGTCA and 5′-TCAGGTGGTCTCCGAACT) with flanking sites of NheI and XhoI. The amplified product was subcloned into the pGL3-basic luciferase vector to generate the pGL3/LPP1-luc. The Quickchange site-directed mutagenesis kit was used to generate the pGL3/mLPP1-luc by disruption of the putative PPRE site (from −624 to −611 bp) with the use of the mutagenic primers: 5′-GAGGGATTCTGGCTAAAGGCG(A)GT(G)TCCC(AA) GGT(G)CTTCTACAAC and 5′-GTTGTAGAAGA(C)CCGG(TT) GAA(C)CC(T)GCCTTTAGCCAGAATCCCTC. The plasmids were transfected together with the pRSV-β-gal plasmid into BAECs by using Lipofectamine 2000. Luciferase activity was measured with the luciferase assay kit and normalized with β-galactosidase activity.


## 2.5. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation

HUVECs were infected with Ad-WT-PPARγ and, 48 h later, cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde. The sheared chromatin DNAs were immunoreacted with 2 μg anti-PPARγ antibody (or IgG as negative control) and precipitated with protein A/G sepharose beads. The eluted immunoprecipitates were digested with proteinase K. DNA was amplified by qPCR with the primers flanking the putative PPREs. The primers for ChIP assay were shown in Table 1.Table 1
The sequences of the primers for ChIP assay.
hLPP1  PPRE1
5′-AGGTGACGGTGGATGGAA-3′
5′-CCTTTGTTGTAGAAGCCCTT-3′
hLPP1  PPRE2
5′-AGGGCTTCTACAACAAAGG-3′
5′-ATCATCCATCCTCGATACCT-3′
hLPP1  PPRE3
5′-CGAGGATGGATGATTTAGCA-3′
5′-GAGCCCTTTCTCACTTAGG-3′


## 2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments. Statistical analyses were performed by using one-way ANOVA. TheP values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. PPREs Are Recurrent Motifs in the 5′-Flanking Region of HumanLPP1 Gene

We analyzed the humanLPP1 5′-flanking (NC_000005.9) using MatInspector (http://www.genomatix.de/) and identified three putative PPRE motifs, respectively, locating at −418 bp (AGGTCAACGTTGA), −548 bp (AATTCAACGGTGA), and −611 bp (AGGTCAAGGGCTT) upstream of the transcriptional start site of humanLPP1 gene (Figure 1).Figure 1
Putative PPAR-responsive elements (PPREs) in 5′-flanking region of the humanLPP1 gene. Three putative PPREs were located in 5′-flanking region of the humanLPP1 gene (NC_000005.9). Nucleotide numbers are relative to the transcription start site (+1, arrow).


### 3.2. PPARγ UpregulatesLPP1 Gene Expression in ECs

To examine whether PPARγ regulatesLPP1, we infected HUVECs with Ad-WT-PPARγ together with Ad-tTA in the presence or absence of tetracycline (0.1 μg/mL) for 24 h. Then, cells were treated with the PPARγ ligand rosiglitazone (5 μM) for 24 h. The qRT-PCR results showed that mRNA level of LPP1 was significantly induced in ECs activated with rosiglitazone or overexpressing PPARγ. Rosiglitazone further augmented the induction by PPARγ overexpression (Figure 2).Figure 2
PPARγ increasesLPP1 expression in mRNA levels. Confluence HUVECs were coinfected with adenoviruses expressing different isoforms of human PPARs together with Ad-tTA. Cells were maintained in the presence or absence of tetracycline for 24 h and then treated with the selective agonists (fenofibrate, GW501516, or rosiglitazone) or vehicle (DMSO). LPP1 mRNA levels were normalized to GAPDH and expressed as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. *P<0.05; **P<0.01 versus control.To investigate whether other two isoforms of PPARs also have similar effects, we also infected the ECs with Ad-WT-PPARα or Ad-WT-PPARδ and treated with their specific agonists fenofibrate (5 μM) and GW501516 (1 μM) for 24 h. LPP1 mRNA level were not affected by neither PPARα nor PPARβ/δ overexpression. Similarly, PPARα and PPARβ/δ agonists had no effect onLPP1 expression (Figure 2).In order to examine whether the effect of rosiglitazone was specific for PPARγ, we used GW9662, a selective antagonist, to pretreat ECs before the exposure. As shown in Figure 3, PPARγ antagonism significantly attenuated the LPP1 induction by rosiglitazone. Taken together, these results indicated thatLPP1 gene was induced by PPARγ activation.Figure 3
PPARγ antagonist attenuates the induction of LPP1 by rosiglitazone. HUVECs were pretreated with GW9662 (20 μM) before the exposure to rosiglitazone. Total RNA were extracted 36 h later and assessed by using qRT-PCR for LPP1 mRNA expression. **P<0.01, versus control (DMSO); #P<0.05, versus rosiglitazone.


### 3.3. PPARγ Binds to the PPRE in the Promoter of HumanLPP1 Gene

Sequence analysis of the 5′-flanking region of humanLPP1 gene revealed three putative PPRE motifs. To examine whether PPARγ binds to these regions, ChIP assay was performed with the anti-PPARγ antibody and IgG as control. The results showed that PPARγ could bind to the PPRE located at −624/−611 bp upstream of the humanLPP1 gene, while the two proximal sites at −481/−468 and −561/−548 had no binding (Figure 4). This result suggested that the PPRE at −624/−611 might mediate the induction by PPARγ.Figure 4
PPARγ binds to the PPRE within the 5′-flanking region of LPP1. HUVECs were coinfected with Ad-WT-PPARγ and Ad-tTA for 48 h. ChIP assays were performed with the antibodies against PPARγ or IgG as a negative control. Immunoprecipitated DNA fragments were detected by qPCR with the use of specific primers spanning the DNA segments containing the predicted PPREs of LPP1 promoter. Data were mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. *P<0.05 versus control.


### 3.4. PPARγ Increases the Promoter Activity of HumanLPP1 Gene via Binding to PPRE3

To further examine whether PPARγ promotes theLPP1 gene transcription activity, we constructed pGL3/LPP1-luc reporter driven by the fragment containing three putative PPREs (Figure 5(a)). BAECs were transfected with pGL3/LPP1-luc plasmid. Luciferase assay showed that the reporter activity was increased by rosiglitazone or overexpression of PPARγ (Figure 5(b)). However, site-directed mutagenesis of the PPRE at −624/−611 abolished the induction by PPARγ, indicating that the PPRE at −624/−611 is the cis-element mediating the PPARγ transactivation.PPARγ increases the promoter activity of LPP1 via binding to PPRE. (a) The pGL3/LPP1-luc and pGL3/mLPP1-luc plasmids with the 1.7 kb of 5′-flanking region of the humanLPP1 gene with 3 putative PPREs and the mutations depicted. (b) BAECs were transfected with pGL3/LPP1-luc or pGL3/mLPP1-luc plasmids together with β-gal plasmids. Data were fold induction of luciferase activity and expressed as mean ± SEM of four independent experiments. *P<0.05; **P<0.01 versus control.
(a)
(b)


## 3.1. PPREs Are Recurrent Motifs in the 5′-Flanking Region of HumanLPP1 Gene

We analyzed the humanLPP1 5′-flanking (NC_000005.9) using MatInspector (http://www.genomatix.de/) and identified three putative PPRE motifs, respectively, locating at −418 bp (AGGTCAACGTTGA), −548 bp (AATTCAACGGTGA), and −611 bp (AGGTCAAGGGCTT) upstream of the transcriptional start site of humanLPP1 gene (Figure 1).Figure 1
Putative PPAR-responsive elements (PPREs) in 5′-flanking region of the humanLPP1 gene. Three putative PPREs were located in 5′-flanking region of the humanLPP1 gene (NC_000005.9). Nucleotide numbers are relative to the transcription start site (+1, arrow).


## 3.2. PPARγ UpregulatesLPP1 Gene Expression in ECs

To examine whether PPARγ regulatesLPP1, we infected HUVECs with Ad-WT-PPARγ together with Ad-tTA in the presence or absence of tetracycline (0.1 μg/mL) for 24 h. Then, cells were treated with the PPARγ ligand rosiglitazone (5 μM) for 24 h. The qRT-PCR results showed that mRNA level of LPP1 was significantly induced in ECs activated with rosiglitazone or overexpressing PPARγ. Rosiglitazone further augmented the induction by PPARγ overexpression (Figure 2).Figure 2
PPARγ increasesLPP1 expression in mRNA levels. Confluence HUVECs were coinfected with adenoviruses expressing different isoforms of human PPARs together with Ad-tTA. Cells were maintained in the presence or absence of tetracycline for 24 h and then treated with the selective agonists (fenofibrate, GW501516, or rosiglitazone) or vehicle (DMSO). LPP1 mRNA levels were normalized to GAPDH and expressed as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. *P<0.05; **P<0.01 versus control.To investigate whether other two isoforms of PPARs also have similar effects, we also infected the ECs with Ad-WT-PPARα or Ad-WT-PPARδ and treated with their specific agonists fenofibrate (5 μM) and GW501516 (1 μM) for 24 h. LPP1 mRNA level were not affected by neither PPARα nor PPARβ/δ overexpression. Similarly, PPARα and PPARβ/δ agonists had no effect onLPP1 expression (Figure 2).In order to examine whether the effect of rosiglitazone was specific for PPARγ, we used GW9662, a selective antagonist, to pretreat ECs before the exposure. As shown in Figure 3, PPARγ antagonism significantly attenuated the LPP1 induction by rosiglitazone. Taken together, these results indicated thatLPP1 gene was induced by PPARγ activation.Figure 3
PPARγ antagonist attenuates the induction of LPP1 by rosiglitazone. HUVECs were pretreated with GW9662 (20 μM) before the exposure to rosiglitazone. Total RNA were extracted 36 h later and assessed by using qRT-PCR for LPP1 mRNA expression. **P<0.01, versus control (DMSO); #P<0.05, versus rosiglitazone.


## 3.3. PPARγ Binds to the PPRE in the Promoter of HumanLPP1 Gene

Sequence analysis of the 5′-flanking region of humanLPP1 gene revealed three putative PPRE motifs. To examine whether PPARγ binds to these regions, ChIP assay was performed with the anti-PPARγ antibody and IgG as control. The results showed that PPARγ could bind to the PPRE located at −624/−611 bp upstream of the humanLPP1 gene, while the two proximal sites at −481/−468 and −561/−548 had no binding (Figure 4). This result suggested that the PPRE at −624/−611 might mediate the induction by PPARγ.Figure 4
PPARγ binds to the PPRE within the 5′-flanking region of LPP1. HUVECs were coinfected with Ad-WT-PPARγ and Ad-tTA for 48 h. ChIP assays were performed with the antibodies against PPARγ or IgG as a negative control. Immunoprecipitated DNA fragments were detected by qPCR with the use of specific primers spanning the DNA segments containing the predicted PPREs of LPP1 promoter. Data were mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. *P<0.05 versus control.


## 3.4. PPARγ Increases the Promoter Activity of HumanLPP1 Gene via Binding to PPRE3

To further examine whether PPARγ promotes theLPP1 gene transcription activity, we constructed pGL3/LPP1-luc reporter driven by the fragment containing three putative PPREs (Figure 5(a)). BAECs were transfected with pGL3/LPP1-luc plasmid. Luciferase assay showed that the reporter activity was increased by rosiglitazone or overexpression of PPARγ (Figure 5(b)). However, site-directed mutagenesis of the PPRE at −624/−611 abolished the induction by PPARγ, indicating that the PPRE at −624/−611 is the cis-element mediating the PPARγ transactivation.PPARγ increases the promoter activity of LPP1 via binding to PPRE. (a) The pGL3/LPP1-luc and pGL3/mLPP1-luc plasmids with the 1.7 kb of 5′-flanking region of the humanLPP1 gene with 3 putative PPREs and the mutations depicted. (b) BAECs were transfected with pGL3/LPP1-luc or pGL3/mLPP1-luc plasmids together with β-gal plasmids. Data were fold induction of luciferase activity and expressed as mean ± SEM of four independent experiments. *P<0.05; **P<0.01 versus control.
(a)
(b)


## 4. Discussion

In the present study, we have demonstrated a transcriptional mechanism regulating the expression ofLPP1 gene. We provided novel evidence that PPARγ and its specific agonist rosiglitazone positively regulate the transcription ofLPP1 gene in ECs. We also identified the PPRE motif within the regulatory region of theLPP1 gene that mediates the action of PPARγ.Elucidation of the transcriptional regulation ofLPP1 is of physiological importance becauseLPP1 is a key enzyme responsible for the catabolism of LPA and S1P which are the bioactive lipid phosphates [5]. Therefore, given the mass and extensive distribution of ECs, the induction ofLPP1 expression may lead to a profound decrease in the concentrations of LPA and S1P, both in circulation and in the tissues, and exert important biological effects. Although PPARγ has its major roles in the regulation of adipogenesis and insulin sensitivity, it also has a variety of protective effects on cardiovascular functions ranging from atherogenesis to blood pressure regulation [24, 25]. The finding that PPARγ inducesLPP1 expression in ECs may provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the cardiovascular effects of PPARγ modulation.LPP1 is an ectoenzyme with its active sites located on the outer surface of plasma membrane. It degrades extracellular LPA to monoacylglycerol, which can be taken into cells to produce intracellular LPA by acylglycerol kinase. Intriguingly, intracellular LPA was known to be an agonist for PPARγ [26, 27]. Thus, it is postulated that the regulation of LPP1 by PPARγ may act as positive loop for extracellular LPA degradation. In human atherosclerotic lesions, LPA was accumulated in the lipid core of the plaques and promoted the development of atherosclerosis in vivo [28, 29]. Lipoprotein-derived LPA promoted the atherosclerosis in animal models [30]. In contrast, PPARγ agonists thiazolidinediones (TZD) reduced atherosclerotic plaques both in diabetic patients and in animal models [31]. Therefore, whether the induction of LPP1 and ensuing decrease in LPA contribute to the antiatherosclerotic effect of PPARγ remains to be investigated. In addition, the effects of PPARγ activation on the protein level, enzymatic activity of LPP1, and extracellular levels of LPA and S1P need to be examined in the future.



---

*Source: 740121-2014-05-12.xml*