# Photoelectric Performance Optimization of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Based on ZnO-TiO2 Composite Nanofibers

Authors: Qiqi Chang; Jun Xu; Yijun Han; Andrea Ehrmann; Tianhong He; Ruiping Zheng
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

As the electron transport layer of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs), the photoanode is an important component that affects photoelectric conversion efficiency (PCE). The commonly used material titanium dioxide (TiO2) is difficult to prepare as nanostructures with large specific surface area, which affects dye loading and electrolyte diffusion. Herein, TiO2 nanofibers and ZnO-TiO2 composite nanofibers with different molar ratios are synthesized by electrospinning technology. The above nanofibers are coated on photoanodes by the doctor blade method to assemble DSSCs. The influence of the composite ratio of ZnO-TiO2 composite nanofibers on the photoelectric performance of the assembled DSSCs is explored. The ZnO-TiO2 composite nanofibers with a molar ratio of 1 : 2 have large specific surface area and porosity and have the smallest charge transfer resistance at the photoanode-electrolyte interface. The PCE of the nanofiber-modified DSSCs reaches a maximum of 3.66%, which is 56% higher than that of the TiO2 nanofiber-modified DSSCs. The photovoltaic parameters such as open circuit voltage (VOC), current density (JSC), and fill factor (FF) are 0.58 V, 10.36 mA/cm2, and 0.61, respectively. Proper compounding of zinc oxide (ZnO) can not only make the nanofibers absorb more dyes and enhance the light-harvesting ability but also improve the diffusion of the electrolyte and enhance the electron transport, thus successfully improving the power conversion efficiency of DSSCs.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The reduction of fossil fuel resources and the emergence of numerous environmental problems have promoted the development and utilization of renewable energy [1]. Solar photovoltaic (PV) technology is one of the most promising technologies [2]. DSSCs have the excellent characteristics of simple preparation, low cost, good flexibility, and easy bending and are widely researched as the potential energy supply for intelligent wearable devices. The photoanode in DSSCs plays a role in supporting dye molecules to absorb sunlight and excite photoelectrons [3]. Improving the electron transport property of the photoanode is an effective way to improve the PCE of the DSSCs [4]. The commonly used material for photoanodes is TiO2, which is nontoxic, environmentally friendly, low-cost, and stable. However, the carrier transmission rate of TiO2 is low, and it cannot be used to prepare nanostructures with large specific surface areas [5].In order to optimize the utility of TiO2 in the photoanode, researchers have made various attempts to improve TiO2-based photoanodes: combining broadband gap semiconductor oxides (such as ZnO, SnO2 [6, 7], and Nb2O5), metal elements (such as Cu [8], Ag [9], Zn, and Co [10, 11]), nonmetallic elements (such as N and C), rare earth elements (such as La [12] and Ce [13]), carbon materials (such as carbon dots, graphene, activated carbon, and carbon nanotubes), and multidoping (such as Cu/S [14], Al/N [15], and Cu/graphene [16]). Among many substances, ZnO has similar band gap energy and band position as TiO2, has a variety of synthesizability, much higher electron mobility [17, 18], and lower light deactivation rate [19] than TiO2. In recent years, some reports have shown that the addition of ZnO can improve the photoelectric conversion efficiency of TiO2-based DSSCs [20–24]. Composite nanomaterials could improve electrical conductivity, but excessive recombination would lead to catalytically active site shielding [25]. With the increase of ZnO, nonconductive Zn2+/dye complexes will be produced, which will reduce the rate of electron injection into TiO2 conduction band, resulting in a low PCE of DSSCs [26, 27]. Therefore, it is very important to explore the influence of the compound ratio of the two materials on the photoelectric conversion efficiency. This work takes different molar ratios as the starting point to explore the effect of ZnO-TiO2 composites on DSSCs.There are many ways to prepare TiO2 and ZnO composites, such as hydrothermal method [28–30], chemical vapor deposition method [31, 32], solution sol technology [33], solution combustion approach [34], and hot pressing method [35]. Among them, electrospinning is a simple method which can control the fiber shape, has reasonable cost, and can be used for large-scale production [36]. A large number of studies have been carried out on the electrospinning technology of TiO2 and ZnO composites. Wang et al. [37] firstly reported the successful preparation of porous TiO2/ZnO composite nanofibers by electrospinning in 2010. Ramos et al. [38] found that electrospinning enables the coupling of TiO2 and ZnO and enhances the incident photon current efficiency. Boyadjiev et al. [39] employed electrospinning technology supplemented by atomic layer deposition to prepare TiO2/ZnO and ZnO/TiO2 core/shell composite nanofibers and found that the thinnest possible shell film has the best photocatalytic performance. Du et al. [40] reported that the PCE of DSSCs with TiO2/ZnO core-shell nanofiber film as photoanode prepared by coaxial electrospinning technology increased from 4.47% to 5.17%. Song et al. [41] reported that the PCE of DSSCs with TiO2-ZnO core-shell particles prepared by coaxial electrospinning and calcination as a photoanode was 5.31%, which was an increase of 23% compared with DSSCs based on TiO2. Nien et al. [42] employed ZnO-TiO2 nanofibers prepared by electrospinning at a weight ratio of 3 : 97, as an additional layer between the TiO2 layer and the electrolyte in the photoanode of DSSCs, and achieved the highest PCE of 6.33%. Although some promising results have been achieved in the relevant studies, the mechanism of ZnO and TiO2 composite is unclear, and the research on composite ratio is not comprehensive. It is worth investigating the optimal doping ratio to achieve the optimal effect of TiO2 and ZnO composite on the photoanode.In the present study, TiO2 nanofibers and ZnO-TiO2 composite nanofibers with different molar ratios were designed and prepared by electrospinning technology for the fabrication of DSSCs photoanodes. The morphology and structural characteristics of the fibers and the photovoltaic performance of nanofiber-based DSSCs were analyzed to explore the application of composite fibers in the photoanode and the effect of the composite ratio on the PCE.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Materials and Reagents

All solvents and reagents, unless otherwise stated, were of purest quality and used as received. Anhydrous ethanol (C2H6O, AR) and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF, AR) were purchased from Tianjin Fengchuan Chemical Reagent Technology Co., Ltd. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP, MW=1300kDa), tetrabutyl titanate (C16H36O4Ti, AR), glacial acetic acid (C2H4O2, AR), lithium iodide (LiI), iodine (I2, AR), acetonitrile (C2H3N, AR), ruthenium(II)bis(tetrabutylammonium) (N719 dye, AR, CAS No. 207347-46-4), ethyl cellulose, and terpineol (C10H18O, AR) were purchased from Shanghai McLean Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. Lithium perchlorate (LiClO4) was purchased from Aladdin Reagent (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Zinc acetate (C4H6O4Zn∙2H2O, AR) was purchased from Tianjin Kemeiou Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. FTO conductive glasses (sheet resistance of 6-8 Ω) and the heat-sealing film were purchased from Liaoning Yingkou Optima New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Deionized water was used throughout the experiment.


### 2.2. Preparation of Electrospinning Precursor Solution

Electrospinning precursor solution was prepared in four steps. 1.3 g of PVP and 10 ml of absolute ethanol were mixed and stirred for 1 h. Separately, 3 ml of absolute ethanol, 3 ml of glacial acetic acid, and 1.5 ml of tetrabutyl titanate were mixed and stirred for 15 minutes. The above two solutions were mixed and stirred for 30 minutes and then vacuumed to obtain a homogeneous spinning solution to form TiO2 nanofibers. The molar ratio of ZnO and TiO2 was designed to be 1 : 4, 1 : 2, 1 : 1, 2 : 1, and 4 : 1 to prepare a mixed solution of zinc acetate and DMF, which was mixed with the corresponding amount of TiO2 spinning solution. After ultrasonic stirring, a homogeneous spinning solution was obtained to form ZnO-TiO2 composite nanofibers [43, 44].


### 2.3. Preparation of Nanofibers

As shown in Figure1(a), the spinning solution formed a stable Taylor cone and was uniformly deposited for a certain period of time to obtain an electrospun fiber membrane. The parameters of electrospinning were as follows: propulsion speed, high voltage, and receiving distance were set to 0.8 ml/h, 15 kV, and 12 cm, respectively. The fiber membrane was vacuum dried at 80 °C for 4 hours, heated to 500 °C at the rate of 5 K/min in nitrogen atmosphere for 4 hours, and naturally cooled to room temperature. The resulting TiO2 nanofibers and ZnO-TiO2 nanofibers with ZnO/TiO2 molar ratios of 1 : 4, 1 : 2, 1 : 1, 2 : 1, and 4 : 1 were denoted as F, F1, F2, F3, F4, and F5, respectively.Figure 1
Schematic diagram of electrospinning (a), schematic diagram of fiber distribution on FTO surface (b), SEM image of short rod-like F2 composite fibers (c), and schematic diagram of DSSCs assembly (d).


### 2.4. DSSC Fabrication

A schematic diagram of DSSC assembly was shown in Figure1(d). FTO conductive glass was used as the photoanode substrate. It was first ultrasonically cleaned with acetone, ethanol, and deionized water. Then, 0.25 g of ground nanofibers, 0.5 g of ethyl cellulose, 0.5 ml of terpineol, and 5 ml of absolute ethanol were evenly mixed to form a slurry. A schematic diagram of the fiber distribution on the FTO surface and a SEM image of the short rod-shaped F2 composite fibers were shown in Figures 1(b) and 1(c). The slurry was scraped and coated on FTO with 8mm×8mm working area with a scraper repeatedly. FTO was kept in a tubular furnace at 450 °C for half an hour and then cooled down naturally. Afterward, it was taken out and soaked in dye solution (N719) in the dark for 24 hours. Dye solution was prepared by dissolving 0.074 g of N719 dye in 250 ml of absolute ethanol. Then, it was gently washed with C2H6O and dried naturally [18, 34, 45]. A perforated heat-sealing film was placed on the surface of the photoanode conductive glass, and the photoanode was exposed. A perforated commercial platinum electrode and the photoanode were alternately clamped and then heated at 120 °C for 5 minutes to melt the heat-sealing film to seal the DSSCs. Using a needle tube, the iodine-based electrolyte was injected into the opening of the counter electrode. The electrolyte solution was prepared by dissolving 0.53 g of lithium iodide, 4.25 g of lithium perchlorate, and 1.01 g of iodine in 200 ml of acetonitrile. After filling the interlayer, the opening was sealed with quick-drying glue to complete the assembly of DSSCs.


### 2.5. Characterization

The morphology and elemental characteristics of the fibers were obtained with S4800 cold field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) and the attached energy spectrometer (EDS). The crystallinity of the fibers was characterized by D8 DISCOVER X-ray diffractometer (XRD). The specific surface area and pore diameter of the fibers were measured by a BSE-PS(M) specific surface area and pore size analyzer through Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method and Barret-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method. The electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) and photovoltaic performance of DSSCs were measured by CHI660E electrochemical workstation and solar light simulator (100 mW/cm2, AM1.5G), and the test data of each test sample was not less than 5 groups.


## 2.1. Materials and Reagents

All solvents and reagents, unless otherwise stated, were of purest quality and used as received. Anhydrous ethanol (C2H6O, AR) and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF, AR) were purchased from Tianjin Fengchuan Chemical Reagent Technology Co., Ltd. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP, MW=1300kDa), tetrabutyl titanate (C16H36O4Ti, AR), glacial acetic acid (C2H4O2, AR), lithium iodide (LiI), iodine (I2, AR), acetonitrile (C2H3N, AR), ruthenium(II)bis(tetrabutylammonium) (N719 dye, AR, CAS No. 207347-46-4), ethyl cellulose, and terpineol (C10H18O, AR) were purchased from Shanghai McLean Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. Lithium perchlorate (LiClO4) was purchased from Aladdin Reagent (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Zinc acetate (C4H6O4Zn∙2H2O, AR) was purchased from Tianjin Kemeiou Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. FTO conductive glasses (sheet resistance of 6-8 Ω) and the heat-sealing film were purchased from Liaoning Yingkou Optima New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Deionized water was used throughout the experiment.


## 2.2. Preparation of Electrospinning Precursor Solution

Electrospinning precursor solution was prepared in four steps. 1.3 g of PVP and 10 ml of absolute ethanol were mixed and stirred for 1 h. Separately, 3 ml of absolute ethanol, 3 ml of glacial acetic acid, and 1.5 ml of tetrabutyl titanate were mixed and stirred for 15 minutes. The above two solutions were mixed and stirred for 30 minutes and then vacuumed to obtain a homogeneous spinning solution to form TiO2 nanofibers. The molar ratio of ZnO and TiO2 was designed to be 1 : 4, 1 : 2, 1 : 1, 2 : 1, and 4 : 1 to prepare a mixed solution of zinc acetate and DMF, which was mixed with the corresponding amount of TiO2 spinning solution. After ultrasonic stirring, a homogeneous spinning solution was obtained to form ZnO-TiO2 composite nanofibers [43, 44].


## 2.3. Preparation of Nanofibers

As shown in Figure1(a), the spinning solution formed a stable Taylor cone and was uniformly deposited for a certain period of time to obtain an electrospun fiber membrane. The parameters of electrospinning were as follows: propulsion speed, high voltage, and receiving distance were set to 0.8 ml/h, 15 kV, and 12 cm, respectively. The fiber membrane was vacuum dried at 80 °C for 4 hours, heated to 500 °C at the rate of 5 K/min in nitrogen atmosphere for 4 hours, and naturally cooled to room temperature. The resulting TiO2 nanofibers and ZnO-TiO2 nanofibers with ZnO/TiO2 molar ratios of 1 : 4, 1 : 2, 1 : 1, 2 : 1, and 4 : 1 were denoted as F, F1, F2, F3, F4, and F5, respectively.Figure 1
Schematic diagram of electrospinning (a), schematic diagram of fiber distribution on FTO surface (b), SEM image of short rod-like F2 composite fibers (c), and schematic diagram of DSSCs assembly (d).


## 2.4. DSSC Fabrication

A schematic diagram of DSSC assembly was shown in Figure1(d). FTO conductive glass was used as the photoanode substrate. It was first ultrasonically cleaned with acetone, ethanol, and deionized water. Then, 0.25 g of ground nanofibers, 0.5 g of ethyl cellulose, 0.5 ml of terpineol, and 5 ml of absolute ethanol were evenly mixed to form a slurry. A schematic diagram of the fiber distribution on the FTO surface and a SEM image of the short rod-shaped F2 composite fibers were shown in Figures 1(b) and 1(c). The slurry was scraped and coated on FTO with 8mm×8mm working area with a scraper repeatedly. FTO was kept in a tubular furnace at 450 °C for half an hour and then cooled down naturally. Afterward, it was taken out and soaked in dye solution (N719) in the dark for 24 hours. Dye solution was prepared by dissolving 0.074 g of N719 dye in 250 ml of absolute ethanol. Then, it was gently washed with C2H6O and dried naturally [18, 34, 45]. A perforated heat-sealing film was placed on the surface of the photoanode conductive glass, and the photoanode was exposed. A perforated commercial platinum electrode and the photoanode were alternately clamped and then heated at 120 °C for 5 minutes to melt the heat-sealing film to seal the DSSCs. Using a needle tube, the iodine-based electrolyte was injected into the opening of the counter electrode. The electrolyte solution was prepared by dissolving 0.53 g of lithium iodide, 4.25 g of lithium perchlorate, and 1.01 g of iodine in 200 ml of acetonitrile. After filling the interlayer, the opening was sealed with quick-drying glue to complete the assembly of DSSCs.


## 2.5. Characterization

The morphology and elemental characteristics of the fibers were obtained with S4800 cold field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) and the attached energy spectrometer (EDS). The crystallinity of the fibers was characterized by D8 DISCOVER X-ray diffractometer (XRD). The specific surface area and pore diameter of the fibers were measured by a BSE-PS(M) specific surface area and pore size analyzer through Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method and Barret-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method. The electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) and photovoltaic performance of DSSCs were measured by CHI660E electrochemical workstation and solar light simulator (100 mW/cm2, AM1.5G), and the test data of each test sample was not less than 5 groups.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. SEM Analysis

As shown in Figures2 and 3, the surface of the precursor fibers was smooth, and there were many ultrafine fibers. After calcination, the overall fibers were thinner, and some fibers were broken, branched, and curled. As the molar ratio of ZnO increased, the average fiber diameter tended to decrease, and the average diameter of all types of fibers was about 400 nm. The F2 fiber was the thinnest, while the F4 fiber exhibited the best shape and uniformity. After calcination, the fiber diameter was generally reduced and the reduction of fiber diameter showed a decreasing trend.Figure 2
SEM images of TiO2 precursor fibers (a) and ZnO-TiO2 precursor fibers with molar ratios of 1 : 4 (b), 1 : 2 (c), 1 : 1 (d), 2 : 1 (e), and 4 : 1 (f).
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)Figure 3
SEM images (a1)–(f1), fiber diameter distributions (a2)–(f2), EDS spectra (a3)–(f3) and element ratio charts (illustration of ( a3)–(f3)) of TiO2 nanofibers and ZnO-TiO2 composite nanofibers with molar ratios of 1 : 4, 1 : 2, 1 : 1, 2 : 1, and 4 : 1.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


### 3.2. EDS Analysis

Qualitative and semiquantitative EDS analyses were conducted on the samples. As shown in Figure3, TiO2 nanofibers presented an enrichment area of Ti and contained O. The combination of mass percentage and atomic number percentage confirmed that TiO2 nanofibers were successfully prepared. The composite nanofibers were abundant in Ti, O, and Zn elements and contained a small amount of impurity elements. With the increase in ZnO molar ratio, the weight ratio of the element Zn also increased. The relative error between the mass percentage of sample F to F4 and the theoretical calculation value was within 10%, and the relative error of F5 was within 25%.


### 3.3. XRD Analysis

As shown in Figure4, the XRD pattern of TiO2 nanofibers presented diffraction peaks at 2θ of 25.41°, 38.06°, 48.12°, 54.15°, 55.16°, 68.89°, and 75.26°, corresponding to the (101), (004), (200), (105), (211), (204), and (215) crystal planes of the TiO2 anatase phase. In addition to the diffraction peaks of TiO2, the XRD pattern of ZnO-TiO2 composite nanofibers also showed diffraction peaks of hexagonal ZnO at 31.8°, 34.4°, 36.3°, 47.5°, 56.6°, 66.4°, 67.9°, and 69.0°, corresponding to the (100), (002), (101), (102), (110), (103), (112), and (201) planes. All peaks were well matched with the standard JCPDS no: 21-1276 and 043-0002 [42, 46]. ZnO exhibited sharp diffraction peaks and good crystallinity. These results confirmed that ZnO-TiO2 composite nanofibers were successfully prepared.Figure 4
XRD patterns of TiO2 nanofibers and ZnO-TiO2 composite nanofibers with molar ratios of 1 : 4, 1 : 2, 1 : 1, 2 : 1, and 4 : 1.


### 3.4. BET Analysis

Through the N2 isotherm adsorption and desorption test on F, F1, F2, F3, F4, and F5 fibers, the nitrogen adsorption and desorption isotherms and the BJH (adsorption) pore volume and pore size curves were obtained, as shown in Figure 5. The data of the fiber-specific surface area calculated by BET multipoint method, adsorption pore volume, and average pore diameter according to BJH method were shown in Table 1. As shown in Figure 5(a), F and F1 nanofibers were difficult in the initial stage of adsorption, but self-acceleration occurred as the adsorption process progresses. Both showed weak interactions and exhibited type III isotherms. The adsorption hysteresis loop appeared in the middle section of the F2 to F5 nanofibers, indicating that it was the slit pores generated by the layered structure, corresponding to the system with capillary condensation. The isotherms of F2 to F5 nanofibers exhibited type IV isotherms with mesoporous structure. With the increase of ZnO molar ratio, the specific surface area of the composite fibers increased first and then decreased. The specific surface area of F4 nanofibers was the largest, and the difference between F2, F3, and F5 nanofibers was not large. In general, the specific surface area of the samples is positively correlated with the dye adsorption capacity. With larger specific surface area, more catalytically active sites can be exposed. As shown in Figure 5(b) and Table 1, with the increase of ZnO molar ratio, the pore volume of the composite nanofibers increased, the average pore diameter first decreased and then increased, and F2 nanofibers had the smallest average pore diameter. The line width expanded with increasing ZnO molar ratio, implying an increase in pore size distribution [46]. The pore size range of F and F1 nanofibers was 2~10 nm, while the pore size range of F2 to F5 nanofibers was 2~4 nm, 2~8 nm, 2~9 nm, and 2~9 nm, respectively. Although F4 nanofibers had the largest surface area, there were more pores with relatively large pore sizes, and the distribution range of F2 nanofibers was the narrowest among F2 to F5, indicating that it contained the smallest pores with the largest proportion. Large porosity can reduce the electron diffusion coefficient [47], and small pore size can increase the connectivity between particles, thereby increasing the charge transport rate. The application of semiconductor photoanodes in DSSCs requires it to have extremely high porosity and surface area to adsorb a large number of dye molecules that can absorb a large number of photons and generate a large number of free electrons [34]. In conclusion, F2 nanofibers with larger specific surface area and porosity were expected to be advantageous.Figure 5
Nitrogen absorption and destruction isotherms (a), BJH (absorption) pore volume and pore size curves (b) of TiO2 nanofibers and ZnO-TiO2 composite nanofibers with molar ratios of 1 : 4, 1 : 2, 1 : 1, 2 : 1, and 4 : 1.
(a)(b)Table 1
BET results of nanofibers.
SamplesIsothermSpecific surface area (m2/g)Adsorption pore volume (ml/g)Average hole diameter (nm)FType III12.010.028.46F1Type III18.170.056.49F2Type IV149.650.072.88F3Type IV166.820.153.63F4Type IV241.590.183.41F5Type IV166.810.195.00


### 3.5. EIS Analysis

The impedance of the photoanode was tested by EIS. The Nyquist and Bode plots of DSSCs assembled by nanofibers with different molar ratios were shown in Figure6, and the inset was the equivalent circuit diagram of DSSCs. The impedance values were summarized in Table 2. R1 and CPE1 represent the charge transfer resistance and double-layer chemical capacitance of the platinum counter electrode/electrolyte, R2 and CPE2 represent the charge transfer resistance and double-layer chemical capacitance of the photoanode/electrolyte, and Rs is the resistance between the glass and the photoanode. With the addition of ZnO, Rs and R2 showed a trend of first decreasing and then increasing, indicating that the addition of ZnO first increased the catalytic activity of composite nanofibers and then reduced it. When the molar ratio of ZnO to TiO2 was 1 : 2, R2 was the smallest, which was 23.5 Ω. Lower R2 represents higher catalytic activity [48–50]. In other words, F2 nanofibers can carry out the redox reaction at the interface between photoanode material and electrolyte fastest. In the Bode plot, the intermediate frequency peak represents the charge transfer process of injected electrons [51]. With the increase in ZnO molar ratio, the phase value first decreased and then increased. F2 nanofibers exhibited the lowest phase value and the phase peak of F4 nanofibers shifted significantly to the low-frequency region. Combining the results of Nyquist and Bode plots, F2 nanofibers had the highest catalytic activity, and its redox reaction was faster at the interface between photoanode and electrolyte, which can promote electron transport.Figure 6
Nyquist plots along with the equivalent circuit (a), Bode plots (b), and J-V curves (c) of TiO2 nanofibers based DSSCs and ZnO-TiO2 composite nanofibers based DSSCs with molar ratios of 1 : 4, 1 : 2, 1 : 1, 2 : 1, and 4 : 1.
(a)(b)(c)Table 2
EIS results and J-V results of the prepared DSSCs.
PhotoanodesRS (Ω)R1 (Ω)R2 (Ω)VOC (V)JSC (mA/cm2)FFPCE (%)F26.14.584.10.509.020.522.35F124.01.642.20.5610.270.492.84F216.98.623.50.5810.360.613.66F325.53.288.70.4711.120.492.56F427.123.567.90.509.470.522.47F525.37.2118.50.499.980.452.20


### 3.6. J-V Characteristics

Figure6 showed the J-V characteristics of nanofibers, and the detailed parameters were given in Table 2. The composite of ZnO improved the band gap of composite nanofibers. Compared with DSSCs based on TiO2 nanofibers, DSSCs based on composite fibers showed higher VOC and higher JSC. The VOC of DSSCs based on ZnO-TiO2 composite fibers with a molar ratio of 1 : 2 increased from 0.50 V to 0.58 V, the JSC increased from 9.02 mA/cm2 to 10.36 mA/cm2, the FF increased from 0.52 to 0.61, and the highest photoelectric conversion efficiency reached 3.66%, which was an increase of 56% compared with DSSCs based on TiO2 nanofibers. The optimization of DSSC performance can be explained as follows: first, the one-dimensional nanomaterials prepared by electrospinning originally had a large specific surface area. By adding appropriate ZnO, the composite nanofibers got increased porosity to absorb more dyes and enhance the light capture ability. In addition, the higher porosity improved the diffusion of electrolyte to the semiconductor and enhanced the redox ability of dye molecules, which produced more electrons in the photoanode. Therefore, more current could be generated by electron transmission to improve the performance of DSSCs.


## 3.1. SEM Analysis

As shown in Figures2 and 3, the surface of the precursor fibers was smooth, and there were many ultrafine fibers. After calcination, the overall fibers were thinner, and some fibers were broken, branched, and curled. As the molar ratio of ZnO increased, the average fiber diameter tended to decrease, and the average diameter of all types of fibers was about 400 nm. The F2 fiber was the thinnest, while the F4 fiber exhibited the best shape and uniformity. After calcination, the fiber diameter was generally reduced and the reduction of fiber diameter showed a decreasing trend.Figure 2
SEM images of TiO2 precursor fibers (a) and ZnO-TiO2 precursor fibers with molar ratios of 1 : 4 (b), 1 : 2 (c), 1 : 1 (d), 2 : 1 (e), and 4 : 1 (f).
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)Figure 3
SEM images (a1)–(f1), fiber diameter distributions (a2)–(f2), EDS spectra (a3)–(f3) and element ratio charts (illustration of ( a3)–(f3)) of TiO2 nanofibers and ZnO-TiO2 composite nanofibers with molar ratios of 1 : 4, 1 : 2, 1 : 1, 2 : 1, and 4 : 1.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


## 3.2. EDS Analysis

Qualitative and semiquantitative EDS analyses were conducted on the samples. As shown in Figure3, TiO2 nanofibers presented an enrichment area of Ti and contained O. The combination of mass percentage and atomic number percentage confirmed that TiO2 nanofibers were successfully prepared. The composite nanofibers were abundant in Ti, O, and Zn elements and contained a small amount of impurity elements. With the increase in ZnO molar ratio, the weight ratio of the element Zn also increased. The relative error between the mass percentage of sample F to F4 and the theoretical calculation value was within 10%, and the relative error of F5 was within 25%.


## 3.3. XRD Analysis

As shown in Figure4, the XRD pattern of TiO2 nanofibers presented diffraction peaks at 2θ of 25.41°, 38.06°, 48.12°, 54.15°, 55.16°, 68.89°, and 75.26°, corresponding to the (101), (004), (200), (105), (211), (204), and (215) crystal planes of the TiO2 anatase phase. In addition to the diffraction peaks of TiO2, the XRD pattern of ZnO-TiO2 composite nanofibers also showed diffraction peaks of hexagonal ZnO at 31.8°, 34.4°, 36.3°, 47.5°, 56.6°, 66.4°, 67.9°, and 69.0°, corresponding to the (100), (002), (101), (102), (110), (103), (112), and (201) planes. All peaks were well matched with the standard JCPDS no: 21-1276 and 043-0002 [42, 46]. ZnO exhibited sharp diffraction peaks and good crystallinity. These results confirmed that ZnO-TiO2 composite nanofibers were successfully prepared.Figure 4
XRD patterns of TiO2 nanofibers and ZnO-TiO2 composite nanofibers with molar ratios of 1 : 4, 1 : 2, 1 : 1, 2 : 1, and 4 : 1.


## 3.4. BET Analysis

Through the N2 isotherm adsorption and desorption test on F, F1, F2, F3, F4, and F5 fibers, the nitrogen adsorption and desorption isotherms and the BJH (adsorption) pore volume and pore size curves were obtained, as shown in Figure 5. The data of the fiber-specific surface area calculated by BET multipoint method, adsorption pore volume, and average pore diameter according to BJH method were shown in Table 1. As shown in Figure 5(a), F and F1 nanofibers were difficult in the initial stage of adsorption, but self-acceleration occurred as the adsorption process progresses. Both showed weak interactions and exhibited type III isotherms. The adsorption hysteresis loop appeared in the middle section of the F2 to F5 nanofibers, indicating that it was the slit pores generated by the layered structure, corresponding to the system with capillary condensation. The isotherms of F2 to F5 nanofibers exhibited type IV isotherms with mesoporous structure. With the increase of ZnO molar ratio, the specific surface area of the composite fibers increased first and then decreased. The specific surface area of F4 nanofibers was the largest, and the difference between F2, F3, and F5 nanofibers was not large. In general, the specific surface area of the samples is positively correlated with the dye adsorption capacity. With larger specific surface area, more catalytically active sites can be exposed. As shown in Figure 5(b) and Table 1, with the increase of ZnO molar ratio, the pore volume of the composite nanofibers increased, the average pore diameter first decreased and then increased, and F2 nanofibers had the smallest average pore diameter. The line width expanded with increasing ZnO molar ratio, implying an increase in pore size distribution [46]. The pore size range of F and F1 nanofibers was 2~10 nm, while the pore size range of F2 to F5 nanofibers was 2~4 nm, 2~8 nm, 2~9 nm, and 2~9 nm, respectively. Although F4 nanofibers had the largest surface area, there were more pores with relatively large pore sizes, and the distribution range of F2 nanofibers was the narrowest among F2 to F5, indicating that it contained the smallest pores with the largest proportion. Large porosity can reduce the electron diffusion coefficient [47], and small pore size can increase the connectivity between particles, thereby increasing the charge transport rate. The application of semiconductor photoanodes in DSSCs requires it to have extremely high porosity and surface area to adsorb a large number of dye molecules that can absorb a large number of photons and generate a large number of free electrons [34]. In conclusion, F2 nanofibers with larger specific surface area and porosity were expected to be advantageous.Figure 5
Nitrogen absorption and destruction isotherms (a), BJH (absorption) pore volume and pore size curves (b) of TiO2 nanofibers and ZnO-TiO2 composite nanofibers with molar ratios of 1 : 4, 1 : 2, 1 : 1, 2 : 1, and 4 : 1.
(a)(b)Table 1
BET results of nanofibers.
SamplesIsothermSpecific surface area (m2/g)Adsorption pore volume (ml/g)Average hole diameter (nm)FType III12.010.028.46F1Type III18.170.056.49F2Type IV149.650.072.88F3Type IV166.820.153.63F4Type IV241.590.183.41F5Type IV166.810.195.00


## 3.5. EIS Analysis

The impedance of the photoanode was tested by EIS. The Nyquist and Bode plots of DSSCs assembled by nanofibers with different molar ratios were shown in Figure6, and the inset was the equivalent circuit diagram of DSSCs. The impedance values were summarized in Table 2. R1 and CPE1 represent the charge transfer resistance and double-layer chemical capacitance of the platinum counter electrode/electrolyte, R2 and CPE2 represent the charge transfer resistance and double-layer chemical capacitance of the photoanode/electrolyte, and Rs is the resistance between the glass and the photoanode. With the addition of ZnO, Rs and R2 showed a trend of first decreasing and then increasing, indicating that the addition of ZnO first increased the catalytic activity of composite nanofibers and then reduced it. When the molar ratio of ZnO to TiO2 was 1 : 2, R2 was the smallest, which was 23.5 Ω. Lower R2 represents higher catalytic activity [48–50]. In other words, F2 nanofibers can carry out the redox reaction at the interface between photoanode material and electrolyte fastest. In the Bode plot, the intermediate frequency peak represents the charge transfer process of injected electrons [51]. With the increase in ZnO molar ratio, the phase value first decreased and then increased. F2 nanofibers exhibited the lowest phase value and the phase peak of F4 nanofibers shifted significantly to the low-frequency region. Combining the results of Nyquist and Bode plots, F2 nanofibers had the highest catalytic activity, and its redox reaction was faster at the interface between photoanode and electrolyte, which can promote electron transport.Figure 6
Nyquist plots along with the equivalent circuit (a), Bode plots (b), and J-V curves (c) of TiO2 nanofibers based DSSCs and ZnO-TiO2 composite nanofibers based DSSCs with molar ratios of 1 : 4, 1 : 2, 1 : 1, 2 : 1, and 4 : 1.
(a)(b)(c)Table 2
EIS results and J-V results of the prepared DSSCs.
PhotoanodesRS (Ω)R1 (Ω)R2 (Ω)VOC (V)JSC (mA/cm2)FFPCE (%)F26.14.584.10.509.020.522.35F124.01.642.20.5610.270.492.84F216.98.623.50.5810.360.613.66F325.53.288.70.4711.120.492.56F427.123.567.90.509.470.522.47F525.37.2118.50.499.980.452.20


## 3.6. J-V Characteristics

Figure6 showed the J-V characteristics of nanofibers, and the detailed parameters were given in Table 2. The composite of ZnO improved the band gap of composite nanofibers. Compared with DSSCs based on TiO2 nanofibers, DSSCs based on composite fibers showed higher VOC and higher JSC. The VOC of DSSCs based on ZnO-TiO2 composite fibers with a molar ratio of 1 : 2 increased from 0.50 V to 0.58 V, the JSC increased from 9.02 mA/cm2 to 10.36 mA/cm2, the FF increased from 0.52 to 0.61, and the highest photoelectric conversion efficiency reached 3.66%, which was an increase of 56% compared with DSSCs based on TiO2 nanofibers. The optimization of DSSC performance can be explained as follows: first, the one-dimensional nanomaterials prepared by electrospinning originally had a large specific surface area. By adding appropriate ZnO, the composite nanofibers got increased porosity to absorb more dyes and enhance the light capture ability. In addition, the higher porosity improved the diffusion of electrolyte to the semiconductor and enhanced the redox ability of dye molecules, which produced more electrons in the photoanode. Therefore, more current could be generated by electron transmission to improve the performance of DSSCs.


## 4. Conclusions

A DSSC is a multicomponent whole. In order to improve PCE, photoanode material with large specific surface area and large porosity is expected. On the one hand, it is necessary to provide a place for attaching dye sensitizers. On the other hand, it is also necessary to provide a channel for electrolyte diffusion. Second related to the photoanode is sensitizers and electrolytes, whose intrinsic properties such as adhesion to the photoanode material and electron transport rate have a direct impact on the PCE of DSSCs.In this work, electrospinning as a simple production method is used to prepare photoanode materials with large specific surface area nanostructures. The achievements of this study are summarized as follows. First, this research successfully explored the preparation method of ZnO-TiO2 composite nanofibers, an ideal component of DSSCs photoanode semiconductor. Second, it is proved that the ZnO-TiO2 composite nanofibers with a molar ratio of 1 : 2 had the best porosity and specific surface area, which could absorb more dyes to enhance the light-harvesting ability and improve the diffusion of electrolytes to enhance electron transport. Finally, it is concluded that the ZnO-TiO2 nanofibers modified DSSCs with a molar ratio of 1 : 2 had the lowest impedance at the photoanode-electrolyte interface and showed the highest PCE of 3.66%, which was 56% higher than that of the TiO2 nanofiber modified DSSCs. The above results provide important supporting data for interpreting the internal mechanism of TiO2-based composite photoanodes. The characteristics of dye sensitized solar cell enable its great prospects in application of intermittent power supply, small-scale power supply, and micro energy storage. Low-power components such as display screens or sensors can be widely applied with dye sensitized solar cell.



---

*Source: 7356943-2022-04-30.xml*