# Laboratory Investigation into Early-Age Strength Improvement of Cold Recycled Asphalt Mixture Containing Asphalt Emulsion and Cement

Authors: Yinfei Du; Lingxiang Kong; Tangzhong Wei
Journal: Advances in Civil Engineering
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

Cold recycled asphalt mixture (CRAM) has been reported to be able to provide a cleaner method to rehabilitate damaged asphalt pavement. This work used the CRAM containing emulsified asphalt (AE) and cement to investigate the methods of improving its early-age strength by considering mixture composition, including the types of AE and cement and the contents of AE, cement, and moisture. The curing conditions, such as temperature and humidity, were also involved. The results show that the mixture should be carefully designed to determine optimum AE and moisture content. Also, high cement content was helpful to increase the early-age strength. By changing the curing environment, it was found that raising curing temperature and applying a relatively low humidity contributed to the early-age strength improvement. The interaction of cement hydration and AE demulsification was investigated using microimage and laboratory experiments. The results show that AE particles were easy to cluster because of the negative ions released by cement hydration. AE delayed the early cement hydration but improved the later intensity of cement hydration. The coupling effect of AE and cement resulted in higher early-age strength than those of the mixtures only with cement or only with AE. The results presented in this work are expected to give guidance for preparing a CRAM with high early-age strength.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

After several years’ service, asphalt pavement tends to generate a series of distresses, such as rutting, cracking, pothole, and so on. Maintenance is required to restore sound service quality. When the distresses are severe or even when the pavement structure is destroyed, milling the asphalt pavement and replacing it, which is also called recycled asphalt pavement (RAP), is always used. Compared with hot recycled asphalt pavement, cold recycled asphalt mixture (CRAM) can help produce a cleaner environment, including less raw aggregate mining, less fossil fuel consumption, and lower carbon footprint [1–3]. Besides, some other wastes, including copper slag [4], steel slag [5], and coal waste [6, 7], were used in the mixture, which further contributed to protecting the environment.It was reported that CRAM was often used in the base layer of heavy-traffic pavement [8–10]. The low early-age strength of CRAM needs a long curing period and thus affects pavement construction efficiency [11], because the top layer should be placed after the CRAM reaches a sufficient strength requirement. The CRAM can also be placed in the top layer of low traffic volume road, and the low early-age strength will delay the time of traffic opening [12]. Especially for the CRAM constructed in winter or cold regions, early-age distresses might appear due to the low strength of this mixture. In addition, the early-age strength was often used to predict the long-term strength of CRAM [13, 14]. It is, therefore, necessary to investigate the early-age strength improvement of this mixture.Many factors can influence the early-age strength of CRAM. Cement, lime [15], and other additives [16] have been reported to be able to accelerate strength development. Besides, improving compaction method [17] and curing conditions [18, 19] could also take effect. For the CRAM with asphalt emulsion (AE) and cement, raising curing temperature could accelerate the demulsification process of AE and the hydration process of cement, thus increasing the early-age strength. Limited studies focused on the methods of improving the early-age strength of this kind of mixture [8, 20–22].This work aims at systematically investigating the early-age strength evolution of CRAM by considering many influencing factors. Different types or contents of AE, cement, and moisture were added to the CRAM to determine an optimized mixture composition. The curing conditions, including temperature and humidity, were also involved to find a proper curing environment. According to the strength evolution characteristics, the CRAM with high early-age strength can be prepared. The interaction between cement hydration and AE demulsification is analyzed using microimages and laboratory experiments, which is expected to help further understand the strength developing mechanism of CRAM.


## 2. Materials and Experimental Program

### 2.1. Materials

A Pen 70 base asphalt was used to prepare cationic slow setting AE [23], which was used to mix aggregate. Its constitution and properties are shown in Table 1. Two types of RAP material with particle size ranging from 0–9.5 mm and 9.5–31.5 mm, together with raw aggregate, were gathered to form a continuous gradation, as shown in Figure 1. The two types of RAP material contained 5.32 wt.% and 4.56 wt.% asphalt, respectively. The default AE content of all the mixture specimens was 4.0%, except for some specified demonstrations. For example, when studying the effect of AE content on the early-age strength of CRAM, there were total of seven contents of AE. The moisture content of the CRAM included two parts: added free water and the water in the AE. The content of added free water was 2.3% except those mixtures in Section 3.1.3.Table 1
Properties of AE.
Index
Test result
Requirement
Particle surface electric charge
Cationic
Cationic
Emulsifier content (%)
3.0
—
Asphalt content (%)
63.0
>62
Water content (%)
34
—
Evaporation residue
Penetration (25°C, 100 g, 5s)/0.1 mm
69.5
50–300
Ductility (15°C, 5 cm/min) (cm)
65.5
>40
Softening temperature (°C)
49.5
—
Storage stability (%)
1 d
0.1
<1
5 d
1.3
<5Figure 1
Aggregate gradation curve of CRAM.To accelerate the strength development, three types of cement, including ordinary Portland cement, sulphoaluminate cement, and slag Portland cement, were used in this study. The default cement content of all the mixture specimens was 2%. In order to study the influence of cement content on the strength development, the amounts of the cement added to the mix were set to be 1%, 1.5%, 2%, 3%, and 4% by weight of the mixture, respectively.


### 2.2. Specimen Preparation

All the required materials, including RAP, cement, mineral powder, premix water, and AE, were mixed using a laboratory mixer. The loose mix was compacted to form cylindrical specimens with a diameter of 150 mm and a height of 95 ± 2.0 mm using a Superpave gyratory compactor with 30 gyrations. Then, the compacted specimens were wrapped with plastic film to simulate the field pavement environment. Finally, the wrapped specimens were put into a curing room.In the curing room, the temperature and humidity were varied to investigate their influences on strength development. The temperature was set to be 0°C, 10°C, 20°C, 30°C, and 60°C, respectively, and the humidity was set to be 55% and 95%, respectively. The curing process of the specimen is shown in Figure2.Figure 2
Specimen curing process.In order to find the interaction effect between AE and cement under a microscope, different kinds of AE/cement mortars were prepared. When observing the dynamic behavior of cement in AE, about 5% Portland cement was added in AE solution with emulsifier (A). When studying the effect of AE on cement hydration, 2–5% AE was added in cement paste (cement/water = 0.4).


### 2.3. Test Methods

#### 2.3.1. Indirect Tensile Strength (ITS) Test

This study used ITS as an indicator to characterize the strength development influenced by many factors. The indirect tensile test was performed at 20°C. The specimens were subjected to a varying load at a vertical displacement rate of 50 mm/min until the specimen was damaged.


#### 2.3.2. Microscopic Test

An L-UEPI optical microscope (Nikon Co. Ltd., Japan) was used to observe the dynamic behavior of cement in AE. A Quanta 250 environment scanning electron microscope (ESEM) (FEI Co. Ltd., America) was used to characterize the surface microstructure of cement mortar and cement/AE mortar.


#### 2.3.3. Isothermal Calorimeter Test

A TAM AIR isothermal calorimeter (TA Co. Ltd., America) was used to acquire the process of cement hydration of cement mortar and cement/AE mortar. The test temperature was 20°C. After the mortar was prepared, the probe was placed into the mortar to detect the heat release rate.


### 2.4. Experimental Program

For clearly illustrating the influencing factor, mixture composition, and corresponding evaluating indicator, a comprehensive experiment program is shown in Table2.Table 2
Experimental program.
Influencing factor
Mixture composition
Evaluating indicator
Mixture composition
Cement
Six contents
4.0% AE (A)/Portland cement/2.3% moisture
ITS
Three types
4.0% AE (A)/1.5% Portland cement/2.3% moisture
AE
Seven contents
AE (A)/2.0% Portland cement/2.3% moisture
Five types
4.0% AE/2.0% Portland cement/2.3% moisture
Moisture
Ten contents
4.0% AE (A)/2.0% Portland cement
ITS and air voids content
Curing condition
Temperature
4.0% AE (A)/2.0% Portland cement/2.3% moisture
ITS and residual moisture content
Humidity
ITS and residual moisture content
Waiting time
ITS and air voids content


## 2.1. Materials

A Pen 70 base asphalt was used to prepare cationic slow setting AE [23], which was used to mix aggregate. Its constitution and properties are shown in Table 1. Two types of RAP material with particle size ranging from 0–9.5 mm and 9.5–31.5 mm, together with raw aggregate, were gathered to form a continuous gradation, as shown in Figure 1. The two types of RAP material contained 5.32 wt.% and 4.56 wt.% asphalt, respectively. The default AE content of all the mixture specimens was 4.0%, except for some specified demonstrations. For example, when studying the effect of AE content on the early-age strength of CRAM, there were total of seven contents of AE. The moisture content of the CRAM included two parts: added free water and the water in the AE. The content of added free water was 2.3% except those mixtures in Section 3.1.3.Table 1
Properties of AE.
Index
Test result
Requirement
Particle surface electric charge
Cationic
Cationic
Emulsifier content (%)
3.0
—
Asphalt content (%)
63.0
>62
Water content (%)
34
—
Evaporation residue
Penetration (25°C, 100 g, 5s)/0.1 mm
69.5
50–300
Ductility (15°C, 5 cm/min) (cm)
65.5
>40
Softening temperature (°C)
49.5
—
Storage stability (%)
1 d
0.1
<1
5 d
1.3
<5Figure 1
Aggregate gradation curve of CRAM.To accelerate the strength development, three types of cement, including ordinary Portland cement, sulphoaluminate cement, and slag Portland cement, were used in this study. The default cement content of all the mixture specimens was 2%. In order to study the influence of cement content on the strength development, the amounts of the cement added to the mix were set to be 1%, 1.5%, 2%, 3%, and 4% by weight of the mixture, respectively.


## 2.2. Specimen Preparation

All the required materials, including RAP, cement, mineral powder, premix water, and AE, were mixed using a laboratory mixer. The loose mix was compacted to form cylindrical specimens with a diameter of 150 mm and a height of 95 ± 2.0 mm using a Superpave gyratory compactor with 30 gyrations. Then, the compacted specimens were wrapped with plastic film to simulate the field pavement environment. Finally, the wrapped specimens were put into a curing room.In the curing room, the temperature and humidity were varied to investigate their influences on strength development. The temperature was set to be 0°C, 10°C, 20°C, 30°C, and 60°C, respectively, and the humidity was set to be 55% and 95%, respectively. The curing process of the specimen is shown in Figure2.Figure 2
Specimen curing process.In order to find the interaction effect between AE and cement under a microscope, different kinds of AE/cement mortars were prepared. When observing the dynamic behavior of cement in AE, about 5% Portland cement was added in AE solution with emulsifier (A). When studying the effect of AE on cement hydration, 2–5% AE was added in cement paste (cement/water = 0.4).


## 2.3. Test Methods

### 2.3.1. Indirect Tensile Strength (ITS) Test

This study used ITS as an indicator to characterize the strength development influenced by many factors. The indirect tensile test was performed at 20°C. The specimens were subjected to a varying load at a vertical displacement rate of 50 mm/min until the specimen was damaged.


### 2.3.2. Microscopic Test

An L-UEPI optical microscope (Nikon Co. Ltd., Japan) was used to observe the dynamic behavior of cement in AE. A Quanta 250 environment scanning electron microscope (ESEM) (FEI Co. Ltd., America) was used to characterize the surface microstructure of cement mortar and cement/AE mortar.


### 2.3.3. Isothermal Calorimeter Test

A TAM AIR isothermal calorimeter (TA Co. Ltd., America) was used to acquire the process of cement hydration of cement mortar and cement/AE mortar. The test temperature was 20°C. After the mortar was prepared, the probe was placed into the mortar to detect the heat release rate.


## 2.3.1. Indirect Tensile Strength (ITS) Test

This study used ITS as an indicator to characterize the strength development influenced by many factors. The indirect tensile test was performed at 20°C. The specimens were subjected to a varying load at a vertical displacement rate of 50 mm/min until the specimen was damaged.


## 2.3.2. Microscopic Test

An L-UEPI optical microscope (Nikon Co. Ltd., Japan) was used to observe the dynamic behavior of cement in AE. A Quanta 250 environment scanning electron microscope (ESEM) (FEI Co. Ltd., America) was used to characterize the surface microstructure of cement mortar and cement/AE mortar.


## 2.3.3. Isothermal Calorimeter Test

A TAM AIR isothermal calorimeter (TA Co. Ltd., America) was used to acquire the process of cement hydration of cement mortar and cement/AE mortar. The test temperature was 20°C. After the mortar was prepared, the probe was placed into the mortar to detect the heat release rate.


## 2.4. Experimental Program

For clearly illustrating the influencing factor, mixture composition, and corresponding evaluating indicator, a comprehensive experiment program is shown in Table2.Table 2
Experimental program.
Influencing factor
Mixture composition
Evaluating indicator
Mixture composition
Cement
Six contents
4.0% AE (A)/Portland cement/2.3% moisture
ITS
Three types
4.0% AE (A)/1.5% Portland cement/2.3% moisture
AE
Seven contents
AE (A)/2.0% Portland cement/2.3% moisture
Five types
4.0% AE/2.0% Portland cement/2.3% moisture
Moisture
Ten contents
4.0% AE (A)/2.0% Portland cement
ITS and air voids content
Curing condition
Temperature
4.0% AE (A)/2.0% Portland cement/2.3% moisture
ITS and residual moisture content
Humidity
ITS and residual moisture content
Waiting time
ITS and air voids content


## 3. Early-Age Strength Developing Characteristic

The various components (e.g., cement, AE, and moisture contents), together with different curing conditions (e.g., time, temperature, and humidity), influence the early-age strength development of CRAM. So, investigating the above influences and concluding some strategies will help improve the early-age strength of this mixture, thus beneficial for early traffic opening or early construction of the upper layer.


### 3.1. Influences of Material Components on Early-Age Strength Development

#### 3.1.1. Cement

Six contents and three types of cement were added in the CRAM to investigate their influences on the early-age strengths during a curing period of 1–7 days. In the mixture specimens with different types of cement, a constant cement content of 1.5% was added. The results are shown in Figures3 and 4, respectively.Figure 3
Variations of early-age strength with different cement contents.Figure 4
Variations of early-age strength with different cement types.Figure3 illustrates that the early-age strength of CRAM increased with curing time. However, the mixture without cement addition presented a very slow strength increasing trend. The mixture with 4% cement content had a 7-day ITS of 1.01 MPa, which was almost ten times higher than that of the mixture without cement, indicating that cement had a significant influence on strength improvement. We can also find that the strength of the mixture with higher cement content had a higher strength increasing rate during the curing period of 1–3 days. During this period, the strength of the mixtures with 0–4% cement increased by 3.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.1, 2.6, and 2.3 times, respectively. This result indicates that the CRAM had a very high strength increasing rate in the early curing period.It can be found from Figure4 that cement type had an influence on the early-age strength of CRAM. For the strength at different curing periods, the mixture with sulphoaluminate cement was the highest among the three kinds of mixture, while the mixtures with the other two kinds of cement had almost equal strengths at different curing periods. The reason for this conclusion is that sulphoaluminate cement belongs to a kind of rapid hardening cement. In order to improve the early-age strength of CRAM, it is suggested to add sulphoaluminate cement into CRAM.


#### 3.1.2. Asphalt Emulsion

The properties of AE with emulsifier (A) (AE (A)) have been shown in Table1. Seven contents of this kind of AE and another four types of AE were added into the CRAM to investigate their influences on the early-age strength at the curing time of 3 days and 7 days, respectively. The results are shown in Figures 5 and 6, respectively.Figure 5
Variations of early-age strength with different AE contents.Figure 6
Variations of early-age strength with different AE types.Different from the increasing strength with increasing cement content, there was an optimum AE content to generate the maximum strength. According to the data shown in Figure5, when the AE content was 4% by weight of the total mixture, the 3-day and 7-day ITSs were up to 0.28 MPa and 0.41 MPa. The two strength values were both higher than those of the mixtures with 3% and 5% AE. Take the 3-day strength, for example. The strength of CRAM with 4% AE was 7% and 25% higher than those of the CRAM with 3% and 5% AE, respectively. The result indicates that it is essential to perform a careful mixture design to determine AE content to get improved early-age strength.As shown in Figure6, AE type had an influence on the early-age strength of CRAM. The 3-days and 7-day ITSs presented similar trends. The ITS of the CRAM with emulsifier (A) lied in the middle of the five CRAMs. Take the strength, for example. The 7-day strength of the CRAM with AE (C) was 0.37 MPa, which was 15.9% lower than that of the CRAM with AE (E). From the above analysis, it can be found that it is important to select a proper emulsifier to prepare CRAM.


#### 3.1.3. Moisture

In the mixture design process, water was added to produce an easily compacted mixture and provide a water source for cement hydration. The moisture content here included the added free water and the water in AE. Total ten moisture contents were used to investigate the evolutions of strength and air voids. The results are shown in Figure7.Figure 7
Variations of early-age strength and air void content with different moisture contents.Around 4.2% moisture content in the mixture at the curing times of 3 days and 7 days both presented the maximum strengths, while there was a minimum air voids content at this moisture content. When the moisture content was lower than 4%, the insufficient aggregate wetting and uneven distribution of AE resulted in the mixture hard to be compacted. By contrast, when the moisture content was higher than 4%, the flow of AE and the “spring state” in the compaction process led to the high air voids content of the mixture. Because of the large air void content, the mixture showed an overall low strength.


### 3.2. Influences of Curing Environment on Early-Age Strength Development

#### 3.2.1. Temperature

The curing temperature can influence cement hydration and AE demulsification, thus having an influence on strength evolution. The combined effect of cement hydration and AE demulsification simultaneously affects the residual moisture content in the mixture. The results of early-age strength and residual moisture content at different temperatures are shown in Figures8 and 9, respectively. It should be noted that the residual moisture included the water consumed for cement hydration. This part of water was considered into the mixture mass.Figure 8
Variations of early-age strength with curing temperatures.Figure 9
Variations of residual moisture content with curing temperatures.At 0°C, the early-age ITS increased very slowly, which was because at this temperature, cement hydration and AE demulsification progressed in very low speeds. The result indicates that it should be forbidden to place CRAM in winter. With temperature rising, the above two processes accelerated and the strength thus increased quickly. When the curing temperature changed from 30°C to 60°C, the strength-developing trend changed a lot. The 7-day strength at the temperature of 60°C was twice higher than that at the temperature of 30°C, indicating that raising the curing temperature could greatly contribute to the early-age strength.Overall, the residual moisture content varied in an opposite trend with curing time, compared to the early-age strength, because water had a higher evaporating rate at a higher temperature. Higher water evaporating efficiency generally led to faster strength development of CRAM.


#### 3.2.2. Humidity

From Figure9, we can find that residual moisture content decreased with increased strength, indicating that the moisture content in the mixture affected its strength development. In order to investigate the above effect in detail, two curing humidity conditions of 55% and 95% were made, and the variations of ITS (curing time of 0–28 days) and corresponding residual moisture content were recorded, as shown in Figure 10.Figure 10
Variations of early-age strength and residual moisture content with curing humidity.Figure10 shows that the ITS reduced with increasing curing humidity, and the strength difference between the two curing humidity enlarged with increasing curing time. The 7-day and 28-day strengths of the mixture in the curing humidity of 55% were 25.2% and 51.3% higher than those in the curing humidity of 95%, respectively.The residual moisture content had an opposite trend with curing time compared with ITS. Although all the mixture specimens were wrapped with plastic films around, the moisture content in specimen decreased with curing time. This is because the moisture was due to the free water evaporation from the upper surface of the specimen.


#### 3.2.3. Waiting Time

The waiting time refers to the period from plant mixing to in situ placement and compaction for cold central-plant recycled mixture or the period from in situ mixing to compaction for cold in-place recycled mixture. To discuss the influence of waiting time on strength development is helpful to make a reasonable plan in in situ construction of CRAM. The results are shown in Figure11.Figure 11
Variation of early-age strength and air void content with working time.Figure11 obviously illustrates that waiting time had a negative influence on strength development. With increasing waiting time, the moisture in the specimen evaporated gradually, which resulted in less free water that could help mixture compaction. In addition, AE particles began to break, leading to more difficult compactibility. It should also be noted that cement gradually hydrated with increasing waiting time. The hydration products before compaction could not fill in the internal air voids in the compacted mixture, which also led to high air void content.


## 3.1. Influences of Material Components on Early-Age Strength Development

### 3.1.1. Cement

Six contents and three types of cement were added in the CRAM to investigate their influences on the early-age strengths during a curing period of 1–7 days. In the mixture specimens with different types of cement, a constant cement content of 1.5% was added. The results are shown in Figures3 and 4, respectively.Figure 3
Variations of early-age strength with different cement contents.Figure 4
Variations of early-age strength with different cement types.Figure3 illustrates that the early-age strength of CRAM increased with curing time. However, the mixture without cement addition presented a very slow strength increasing trend. The mixture with 4% cement content had a 7-day ITS of 1.01 MPa, which was almost ten times higher than that of the mixture without cement, indicating that cement had a significant influence on strength improvement. We can also find that the strength of the mixture with higher cement content had a higher strength increasing rate during the curing period of 1–3 days. During this period, the strength of the mixtures with 0–4% cement increased by 3.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.1, 2.6, and 2.3 times, respectively. This result indicates that the CRAM had a very high strength increasing rate in the early curing period.It can be found from Figure4 that cement type had an influence on the early-age strength of CRAM. For the strength at different curing periods, the mixture with sulphoaluminate cement was the highest among the three kinds of mixture, while the mixtures with the other two kinds of cement had almost equal strengths at different curing periods. The reason for this conclusion is that sulphoaluminate cement belongs to a kind of rapid hardening cement. In order to improve the early-age strength of CRAM, it is suggested to add sulphoaluminate cement into CRAM.


### 3.1.2. Asphalt Emulsion

The properties of AE with emulsifier (A) (AE (A)) have been shown in Table1. Seven contents of this kind of AE and another four types of AE were added into the CRAM to investigate their influences on the early-age strength at the curing time of 3 days and 7 days, respectively. The results are shown in Figures 5 and 6, respectively.Figure 5
Variations of early-age strength with different AE contents.Figure 6
Variations of early-age strength with different AE types.Different from the increasing strength with increasing cement content, there was an optimum AE content to generate the maximum strength. According to the data shown in Figure5, when the AE content was 4% by weight of the total mixture, the 3-day and 7-day ITSs were up to 0.28 MPa and 0.41 MPa. The two strength values were both higher than those of the mixtures with 3% and 5% AE. Take the 3-day strength, for example. The strength of CRAM with 4% AE was 7% and 25% higher than those of the CRAM with 3% and 5% AE, respectively. The result indicates that it is essential to perform a careful mixture design to determine AE content to get improved early-age strength.As shown in Figure6, AE type had an influence on the early-age strength of CRAM. The 3-days and 7-day ITSs presented similar trends. The ITS of the CRAM with emulsifier (A) lied in the middle of the five CRAMs. Take the strength, for example. The 7-day strength of the CRAM with AE (C) was 0.37 MPa, which was 15.9% lower than that of the CRAM with AE (E). From the above analysis, it can be found that it is important to select a proper emulsifier to prepare CRAM.


### 3.1.3. Moisture

In the mixture design process, water was added to produce an easily compacted mixture and provide a water source for cement hydration. The moisture content here included the added free water and the water in AE. Total ten moisture contents were used to investigate the evolutions of strength and air voids. The results are shown in Figure7.Figure 7
Variations of early-age strength and air void content with different moisture contents.Around 4.2% moisture content in the mixture at the curing times of 3 days and 7 days both presented the maximum strengths, while there was a minimum air voids content at this moisture content. When the moisture content was lower than 4%, the insufficient aggregate wetting and uneven distribution of AE resulted in the mixture hard to be compacted. By contrast, when the moisture content was higher than 4%, the flow of AE and the “spring state” in the compaction process led to the high air voids content of the mixture. Because of the large air void content, the mixture showed an overall low strength.


## 3.1.1. Cement

Six contents and three types of cement were added in the CRAM to investigate their influences on the early-age strengths during a curing period of 1–7 days. In the mixture specimens with different types of cement, a constant cement content of 1.5% was added. The results are shown in Figures3 and 4, respectively.Figure 3
Variations of early-age strength with different cement contents.Figure 4
Variations of early-age strength with different cement types.Figure3 illustrates that the early-age strength of CRAM increased with curing time. However, the mixture without cement addition presented a very slow strength increasing trend. The mixture with 4% cement content had a 7-day ITS of 1.01 MPa, which was almost ten times higher than that of the mixture without cement, indicating that cement had a significant influence on strength improvement. We can also find that the strength of the mixture with higher cement content had a higher strength increasing rate during the curing period of 1–3 days. During this period, the strength of the mixtures with 0–4% cement increased by 3.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.1, 2.6, and 2.3 times, respectively. This result indicates that the CRAM had a very high strength increasing rate in the early curing period.It can be found from Figure4 that cement type had an influence on the early-age strength of CRAM. For the strength at different curing periods, the mixture with sulphoaluminate cement was the highest among the three kinds of mixture, while the mixtures with the other two kinds of cement had almost equal strengths at different curing periods. The reason for this conclusion is that sulphoaluminate cement belongs to a kind of rapid hardening cement. In order to improve the early-age strength of CRAM, it is suggested to add sulphoaluminate cement into CRAM.


## 3.1.2. Asphalt Emulsion

The properties of AE with emulsifier (A) (AE (A)) have been shown in Table1. Seven contents of this kind of AE and another four types of AE were added into the CRAM to investigate their influences on the early-age strength at the curing time of 3 days and 7 days, respectively. The results are shown in Figures 5 and 6, respectively.Figure 5
Variations of early-age strength with different AE contents.Figure 6
Variations of early-age strength with different AE types.Different from the increasing strength with increasing cement content, there was an optimum AE content to generate the maximum strength. According to the data shown in Figure5, when the AE content was 4% by weight of the total mixture, the 3-day and 7-day ITSs were up to 0.28 MPa and 0.41 MPa. The two strength values were both higher than those of the mixtures with 3% and 5% AE. Take the 3-day strength, for example. The strength of CRAM with 4% AE was 7% and 25% higher than those of the CRAM with 3% and 5% AE, respectively. The result indicates that it is essential to perform a careful mixture design to determine AE content to get improved early-age strength.As shown in Figure6, AE type had an influence on the early-age strength of CRAM. The 3-days and 7-day ITSs presented similar trends. The ITS of the CRAM with emulsifier (A) lied in the middle of the five CRAMs. Take the strength, for example. The 7-day strength of the CRAM with AE (C) was 0.37 MPa, which was 15.9% lower than that of the CRAM with AE (E). From the above analysis, it can be found that it is important to select a proper emulsifier to prepare CRAM.


## 3.1.3. Moisture

In the mixture design process, water was added to produce an easily compacted mixture and provide a water source for cement hydration. The moisture content here included the added free water and the water in AE. Total ten moisture contents were used to investigate the evolutions of strength and air voids. The results are shown in Figure7.Figure 7
Variations of early-age strength and air void content with different moisture contents.Around 4.2% moisture content in the mixture at the curing times of 3 days and 7 days both presented the maximum strengths, while there was a minimum air voids content at this moisture content. When the moisture content was lower than 4%, the insufficient aggregate wetting and uneven distribution of AE resulted in the mixture hard to be compacted. By contrast, when the moisture content was higher than 4%, the flow of AE and the “spring state” in the compaction process led to the high air voids content of the mixture. Because of the large air void content, the mixture showed an overall low strength.


## 3.2. Influences of Curing Environment on Early-Age Strength Development

### 3.2.1. Temperature

The curing temperature can influence cement hydration and AE demulsification, thus having an influence on strength evolution. The combined effect of cement hydration and AE demulsification simultaneously affects the residual moisture content in the mixture. The results of early-age strength and residual moisture content at different temperatures are shown in Figures8 and 9, respectively. It should be noted that the residual moisture included the water consumed for cement hydration. This part of water was considered into the mixture mass.Figure 8
Variations of early-age strength with curing temperatures.Figure 9
Variations of residual moisture content with curing temperatures.At 0°C, the early-age ITS increased very slowly, which was because at this temperature, cement hydration and AE demulsification progressed in very low speeds. The result indicates that it should be forbidden to place CRAM in winter. With temperature rising, the above two processes accelerated and the strength thus increased quickly. When the curing temperature changed from 30°C to 60°C, the strength-developing trend changed a lot. The 7-day strength at the temperature of 60°C was twice higher than that at the temperature of 30°C, indicating that raising the curing temperature could greatly contribute to the early-age strength.Overall, the residual moisture content varied in an opposite trend with curing time, compared to the early-age strength, because water had a higher evaporating rate at a higher temperature. Higher water evaporating efficiency generally led to faster strength development of CRAM.


### 3.2.2. Humidity

From Figure9, we can find that residual moisture content decreased with increased strength, indicating that the moisture content in the mixture affected its strength development. In order to investigate the above effect in detail, two curing humidity conditions of 55% and 95% were made, and the variations of ITS (curing time of 0–28 days) and corresponding residual moisture content were recorded, as shown in Figure 10.Figure 10
Variations of early-age strength and residual moisture content with curing humidity.Figure10 shows that the ITS reduced with increasing curing humidity, and the strength difference between the two curing humidity enlarged with increasing curing time. The 7-day and 28-day strengths of the mixture in the curing humidity of 55% were 25.2% and 51.3% higher than those in the curing humidity of 95%, respectively.The residual moisture content had an opposite trend with curing time compared with ITS. Although all the mixture specimens were wrapped with plastic films around, the moisture content in specimen decreased with curing time. This is because the moisture was due to the free water evaporation from the upper surface of the specimen.


### 3.2.3. Waiting Time

The waiting time refers to the period from plant mixing to in situ placement and compaction for cold central-plant recycled mixture or the period from in situ mixing to compaction for cold in-place recycled mixture. To discuss the influence of waiting time on strength development is helpful to make a reasonable plan in in situ construction of CRAM. The results are shown in Figure11.Figure 11
Variation of early-age strength and air void content with working time.Figure11 obviously illustrates that waiting time had a negative influence on strength development. With increasing waiting time, the moisture in the specimen evaporated gradually, which resulted in less free water that could help mixture compaction. In addition, AE particles began to break, leading to more difficult compactibility. It should also be noted that cement gradually hydrated with increasing waiting time. The hydration products before compaction could not fill in the internal air voids in the compacted mixture, which also led to high air void content.


## 3.2.1. Temperature

The curing temperature can influence cement hydration and AE demulsification, thus having an influence on strength evolution. The combined effect of cement hydration and AE demulsification simultaneously affects the residual moisture content in the mixture. The results of early-age strength and residual moisture content at different temperatures are shown in Figures8 and 9, respectively. It should be noted that the residual moisture included the water consumed for cement hydration. This part of water was considered into the mixture mass.Figure 8
Variations of early-age strength with curing temperatures.Figure 9
Variations of residual moisture content with curing temperatures.At 0°C, the early-age ITS increased very slowly, which was because at this temperature, cement hydration and AE demulsification progressed in very low speeds. The result indicates that it should be forbidden to place CRAM in winter. With temperature rising, the above two processes accelerated and the strength thus increased quickly. When the curing temperature changed from 30°C to 60°C, the strength-developing trend changed a lot. The 7-day strength at the temperature of 60°C was twice higher than that at the temperature of 30°C, indicating that raising the curing temperature could greatly contribute to the early-age strength.Overall, the residual moisture content varied in an opposite trend with curing time, compared to the early-age strength, because water had a higher evaporating rate at a higher temperature. Higher water evaporating efficiency generally led to faster strength development of CRAM.


## 3.2.2. Humidity

From Figure9, we can find that residual moisture content decreased with increased strength, indicating that the moisture content in the mixture affected its strength development. In order to investigate the above effect in detail, two curing humidity conditions of 55% and 95% were made, and the variations of ITS (curing time of 0–28 days) and corresponding residual moisture content were recorded, as shown in Figure 10.Figure 10
Variations of early-age strength and residual moisture content with curing humidity.Figure10 shows that the ITS reduced with increasing curing humidity, and the strength difference between the two curing humidity enlarged with increasing curing time. The 7-day and 28-day strengths of the mixture in the curing humidity of 55% were 25.2% and 51.3% higher than those in the curing humidity of 95%, respectively.The residual moisture content had an opposite trend with curing time compared with ITS. Although all the mixture specimens were wrapped with plastic films around, the moisture content in specimen decreased with curing time. This is because the moisture was due to the free water evaporation from the upper surface of the specimen.


## 3.2.3. Waiting Time

The waiting time refers to the period from plant mixing to in situ placement and compaction for cold central-plant recycled mixture or the period from in situ mixing to compaction for cold in-place recycled mixture. To discuss the influence of waiting time on strength development is helpful to make a reasonable plan in in situ construction of CRAM. The results are shown in Figure11.Figure 11
Variation of early-age strength and air void content with working time.Figure11 obviously illustrates that waiting time had a negative influence on strength development. With increasing waiting time, the moisture in the specimen evaporated gradually, which resulted in less free water that could help mixture compaction. In addition, AE particles began to break, leading to more difficult compactibility. It should also be noted that cement gradually hydrated with increasing waiting time. The hydration products before compaction could not fill in the internal air voids in the compacted mixture, which also led to high air void content.


## 4. Interaction between Cement and AE

It was reported that cement was added in the CRAM to improve its early-age strength [15], which also validated by the results in Figures 3 and 4. AE provided the other adhesive effect between loose particles (e.g., RAP and aggregate). Investigating the interactions between these two bonding materials provides a guide to further understand the strength developing mechanism.


### 4.1. Combined Effect of Cement and AE in the Development of Early-Age Strength

Three mixtures with the same aggregate gradation and three kinds of bonding materials (both with cement and AE, only with AE, and only with cement) were prepared to investigate the combined effect of cement and AE in the development of early-age strength. For the mixture only with AE, cement was replaced by limestone filler based on the concept of equal volume. For the mixture only with cement, the water in AE was supplemented by adding more water during mixing. The “Sum” in Figure12 was equal to the strength of the mixture only with AE and the strength of the mixture only with cement.Figure 12
Early-age strength developing process under different bonding conditions.The strength comparison of the mixtures only with AE and only with cement indicates that cement had a higher influence on very early-age strength than AE, while the strength of the mixture only with AE gradually increased with curing time. It can be found that the strength of control mixture was higher than that of “Sum,” indicating that the interaction between cement and AE is beneficial for the early-age strength improvement of the mixture. The 7-day and 14-day strength values of control mixture were 39.7% and 37.3% higher than those of “Sum,” respectively.


### 4.2. Dynamic Behavior of Cement in AE

In order to observe the dynamic behavior of cement in AE, a series of optical image comparison of AE/cement mortar were performed. The prepared mortar was placed under the scope of an optical microscope. The images that were magnified by 40 times were captured according to the time requirement. The results are shown in Figure13.Figure 13
Dynamic images: (a) AE solution (1 min); (b) AE solution (10 min); (c) cement/AE composite (1 min); (d) cement/AE composite (10 min).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figures13(a) and 13(b) show that AE particles are evenly distributed in AE solution. With time prolonging, AE was gradually demulsified. By contrast, AE began to cluster around cement in a very short time when cement was added. And, the cluster phenomenon gradually strengthened with time, as shown in Figure 13(d). Simultaneously, the dispersed AE particles also clustered because of cement addition. The above phenomenon was attributed to negative ions released by cement hydration, which caused AE particles’ attraction and clustering with each other.


### 4.3. Effect of AE on Cement Hydration

#### 4.3.1. Heat Release Rate

The heat release rate curve of cement/AE mortar was used to investigate the effect of AE on cement hydration. The results are shown in Figure14.Figure 14
Cement hydration curves with different AE contents.
(a)
(b)It can be seen from Figure14(a) that AE delayed the overall hydration process. Figure 14(b) could quantitatively illustrate the induction period delayed by the addition of AE. The induction period of cement hydration was extended from 1h to nearly 18 h when 5% AE was added into cement. We can also find that the peak heat release rate of cement/AE mortar increased. As AE content increased, more water was introduced, which provided more opportunities for cement hydration.


#### 4.3.2. ESEM Image

ESEM images of cement and cement/AE mortar at the curing time of 5 days and 7 days were captured, as shown in Figure15. All the images were magnified by 10000 times.Figure 15
ESEM images: (a) cement mortar (5 days); (b) cement mortar (7 days); (c) cement/AE mortar (5 days); (d) cement/AE mortar (7 days).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)There have been many cement hydration products in the 5-day cement mortar, as shown in Figure15(a). Two days later, there was no obvious change of cement hydration products. By contrast, there were very few hydration products in the cement/AE mortar at the curing time of 5 days. However, many hydration products appeared on the surfaces of spherical AE particles, as shown in Figure 15(d). The results indicate that AE delayed the process of cement hydration.


## 4.1. Combined Effect of Cement and AE in the Development of Early-Age Strength

Three mixtures with the same aggregate gradation and three kinds of bonding materials (both with cement and AE, only with AE, and only with cement) were prepared to investigate the combined effect of cement and AE in the development of early-age strength. For the mixture only with AE, cement was replaced by limestone filler based on the concept of equal volume. For the mixture only with cement, the water in AE was supplemented by adding more water during mixing. The “Sum” in Figure12 was equal to the strength of the mixture only with AE and the strength of the mixture only with cement.Figure 12
Early-age strength developing process under different bonding conditions.The strength comparison of the mixtures only with AE and only with cement indicates that cement had a higher influence on very early-age strength than AE, while the strength of the mixture only with AE gradually increased with curing time. It can be found that the strength of control mixture was higher than that of “Sum,” indicating that the interaction between cement and AE is beneficial for the early-age strength improvement of the mixture. The 7-day and 14-day strength values of control mixture were 39.7% and 37.3% higher than those of “Sum,” respectively.


## 4.2. Dynamic Behavior of Cement in AE

In order to observe the dynamic behavior of cement in AE, a series of optical image comparison of AE/cement mortar were performed. The prepared mortar was placed under the scope of an optical microscope. The images that were magnified by 40 times were captured according to the time requirement. The results are shown in Figure13.Figure 13
Dynamic images: (a) AE solution (1 min); (b) AE solution (10 min); (c) cement/AE composite (1 min); (d) cement/AE composite (10 min).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figures13(a) and 13(b) show that AE particles are evenly distributed in AE solution. With time prolonging, AE was gradually demulsified. By contrast, AE began to cluster around cement in a very short time when cement was added. And, the cluster phenomenon gradually strengthened with time, as shown in Figure 13(d). Simultaneously, the dispersed AE particles also clustered because of cement addition. The above phenomenon was attributed to negative ions released by cement hydration, which caused AE particles’ attraction and clustering with each other.


## 4.3. Effect of AE on Cement Hydration

### 4.3.1. Heat Release Rate

The heat release rate curve of cement/AE mortar was used to investigate the effect of AE on cement hydration. The results are shown in Figure14.Figure 14
Cement hydration curves with different AE contents.
(a)
(b)It can be seen from Figure14(a) that AE delayed the overall hydration process. Figure 14(b) could quantitatively illustrate the induction period delayed by the addition of AE. The induction period of cement hydration was extended from 1h to nearly 18 h when 5% AE was added into cement. We can also find that the peak heat release rate of cement/AE mortar increased. As AE content increased, more water was introduced, which provided more opportunities for cement hydration.


### 4.3.2. ESEM Image

ESEM images of cement and cement/AE mortar at the curing time of 5 days and 7 days were captured, as shown in Figure15. All the images were magnified by 10000 times.Figure 15
ESEM images: (a) cement mortar (5 days); (b) cement mortar (7 days); (c) cement/AE mortar (5 days); (d) cement/AE mortar (7 days).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)There have been many cement hydration products in the 5-day cement mortar, as shown in Figure15(a). Two days later, there was no obvious change of cement hydration products. By contrast, there were very few hydration products in the cement/AE mortar at the curing time of 5 days. However, many hydration products appeared on the surfaces of spherical AE particles, as shown in Figure 15(d). The results indicate that AE delayed the process of cement hydration.


## 4.3.1. Heat Release Rate

The heat release rate curve of cement/AE mortar was used to investigate the effect of AE on cement hydration. The results are shown in Figure14.Figure 14
Cement hydration curves with different AE contents.
(a)
(b)It can be seen from Figure14(a) that AE delayed the overall hydration process. Figure 14(b) could quantitatively illustrate the induction period delayed by the addition of AE. The induction period of cement hydration was extended from 1h to nearly 18 h when 5% AE was added into cement. We can also find that the peak heat release rate of cement/AE mortar increased. As AE content increased, more water was introduced, which provided more opportunities for cement hydration.


## 4.3.2. ESEM Image

ESEM images of cement and cement/AE mortar at the curing time of 5 days and 7 days were captured, as shown in Figure15. All the images were magnified by 10000 times.Figure 15
ESEM images: (a) cement mortar (5 days); (b) cement mortar (7 days); (c) cement/AE mortar (5 days); (d) cement/AE mortar (7 days).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)There have been many cement hydration products in the 5-day cement mortar, as shown in Figure15(a). Two days later, there was no obvious change of cement hydration products. By contrast, there were very few hydration products in the cement/AE mortar at the curing time of 5 days. However, many hydration products appeared on the surfaces of spherical AE particles, as shown in Figure 15(d). The results indicate that AE delayed the process of cement hydration.


## 5. Conclusions

Compared with hot recycled asphalt mixture, cold recycled asphalt mixture (CRAM) could save more energy consumption. However, the early-age strength of this mixture is vital to early traffic opening of newly rehabilitated pavement. This work investigated the influences of a series of factors, including mixture composition and curing environment, on the early-age indirect tensile strength (ITS) of CRAM containing asphalt emulsion (AE) and cement.Increasing cement content, combined with using fast hardening cement (e.g., sulphoaluminate cement), could increase the ITS of CRAM. However, it should be noted that there were optimum AE and moisture contents to ensure the high ITS. AE type also had an influence on the ITS. Curing environment, such as temperature and humidity, influenced the ITS as well. Raising curing temperature dramatically increased the ITS, because of the high water evaporating, AE demulsification, and cement hydration rates. The humidity result shows that 55% humidity was superior to 95% humidity in improving the ITS. It was necessary to shorten the period during mixture mixing to compaction to get a high ITS.The interaction of cement hydration and AE demulsification was investigated by performing microimages and laboratory experiments of the CRAM or cement/AE mortar. It was found that AE particles were easy to cluster due to the negative ions released by cement hydration. Although AE addition delayed cement hydration, a phenomenon of higher heat release rate in cement hydration was observed. The results show that the coupled effect of cement and AE helps to develop higher early-age strength, compared with the mixture or mortar only with cement or only with AE.



---

*Source: 7274204-2019-06-12.xml*