# The Segmental Morphometric Properties of the Horse Cervical Spinal Cord: A Study of Cadaver

Authors: Sadullah Bahar; Durmus Bolat; Muhammet Lutfi Selcuk
Journal: The Scientific World Journal
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

Although the cervical spinal cord (CSC) of the horse has particular importance in diseases of CNS, there is very little information about its segmental morphometry. The objective of the present study was to determine the morphometric features of the CSC segments in the horse and possible relationships among the morphometric features. The segmented CSC from five mature animals was used. Length, weight, diameter, and volume measurements of the segments were performed macroscopically. Lengths and diameters of segments were measured histologically, and area and volume measurements were performed using stereological methods. The length, weight, and volume of the CSC were61.6±3.2 cm, 107.2±10.4 g, and 95.5±8.3 cm3, respectively. The length of the segments was increased from C1 to C3, while it decreased from C3 to C8. The gross section (GS), white matter (WM), grey matter (GM), dorsal horn (DH), and ventral horn (VH) had the largest cross-section areas at C8. The highest volume was found for the total segment and WM at C4, GM, DH, and VH at C7, and the central canal (CC) at C3. The data obtained not only contribute to the knowledge of the normal anatomy of the CSC but may also provide reference data for veterinary pathologists and clinicians.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The spinal cord (SC) is macroscopically or microscopically affected by aging and disease, like the other organs. To determine or monitor these alterations, using quantitative data is more effective than using qualitative evaluation. The morphometric differences, in terms of length, diameter, area, and volume, of SC segments between humans and other animal species have been revealed in previous research. These studies can be divided into three groups according to their methodology: (a) macroscopic [1, 2], (b) microscopic [3, 4], and (c) medical imaging [5–7]. In the last group, measurements have mostly been performed by manual segmentation or by taking into account the vertebrae [6, 8, 9]. In the first two groups, studies in which segmentation has been performed, measurements of the diameter and cross-sectional area have been performed on a certain region of the segments (a) or on a section taken from a certain region of tissue (b).Stereological methods that depend on the effective sampling of biological tissues have been performed frequently since 1980 for effective calculation of volume, surface area, length, and number parameters of tissue without bias [10, 11]. These techniques are used, especially in the brain, to calculate the volume, cortical surface area, and the number of cells [12, 13]. Limited information on segmental morphometry obtained using the techniques mentioned has been provided by research performed on the SC of rats [14], mice [14, 15], and chickens [4].Diseases of the cervical spinal cord (CSC) have a special importance among the central nervous system diseases of the horse because of their high prevalence, clinical signs and often poor prognosis [16, 17]. In addition to supportive diagnostic radiography, medical imaging methods (Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computerized Tomography) have been used in recent years to diagnose and monitor disease progress [8]. Morphometric evaluations of the SC and its surrounding tissue are often used in medical imaging, as in histopathological studies [6, 8, 18–20]. Unlike many other mammalian species including humans, the morphometric data obtained postmortem from horses and interpreted as reference values have been realized to be quite inadequate.The objectives of this study were to determine the morphometric features of the CSC of mature horses macroscopically and to reveal the microscopic morphometry using stereological methods. The data obtained were used to investigate possible relationships among the compartments of the SC.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Animals

The present study was performed on the SC of five horses of different breeds and sex (a 12-year-old male Thoroughbred weighing 450 kg, a 10-year-old male Thoroughbred weighing 420 kg, a 15-year-old male Belgian horse weighing 480 kg, a 13-year-old female Arabian horse weighing 300 kg, and a 15-year-old female Shetland pony weighing 230 kg) that were scheduled for euthanasia upon being diagnosed with various orthopedic disorders after referral to the Equestrian Facilities of Selcuk University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine. The study protocol was approved by the Ethic Committee. The animals were anaesthetized by administration of 10% chloral hydrate (80 mg/kg, I.V.) [21] and killed under general anesthesia afterwards; 10% neutral formalin solution was perfused via the common carotid artery.


### 2.2. Dissection, Extraction, and Segmentation

Dissection was performed ten days after the fixation procedure. The brain was opened with a dorsal approach, and the SC was exposed by laminectomy. The SC was cut transversally in front of the roots of theC1 spinal nerve, preserving the dura mater, and removed from the brainstem. The spinal dura mater and arachnoid mater were opened dorsally. The border between the two segments was determined as described previously [2]. Segmentation of the SC was completed by cutting transversally from the indicated points, except for the caudal segments.


### 2.3. Macroscopic Measurements

The length and diameter of each segment was measured using digital calipers, and segment volume was assessed by Archimedes’ principle. All segments were weighed with an assay balance (0.01 g). Only weight and volume measurements were performed on the brain.


### 2.4. Stereological Design and Microscopic Analysis

Volume parameters were utilized using Cavalieri’s principle. The following steps were included in this method: tissue sampling, determination of surface area, and volume calculation [10, 22, 23].The segments were sampled in accordance with a systematic random sampling principle before the histological procedures [10, 24]. For this procedure, a tissue slicer was prepared with microtome blades that were placed at 3.8 mm intervals, parallel to one another. The segments were placed perpendicular to the blades on the slicer so that the first tissue section was taken at random. All slabs belonging to the C1 and C8 segments were taken without sampling, while slabs taken from the other segments were sampled in 1/2 and 1/3 ratios. Slabs (8 or 13) were taken from the segments at the end of this procedure. All the slabs were numbered from a cranial to caudal direction and placed in trays, protecting their cranial cut surfaces. All the sections were dehydrated according to Bolat et al. [25], and paraffin blocks were prepared. One section from the first 30 consecutive sections taken from the paraffin block was obtained randomly using a rotary microtome at 10 μm thickness and mounted on to a gelatinized glass slide. The sections were stored in a thermostatically controlled oven at 37°C for 24 hours and subsequently stained with modified May-Grunwald-Giemsa (Figure 1) [25]. The distance between two consecutive sections after the histological procedure was 3.4 mm for C1 and C8 segments, 6.8 mm for 1/2 percent sampled segments and 10.2 mm for 1/3 percent sampled segments.Figure 1
Gross-section of the spinal cord (scanned image), central canal (microscopic image), and measurements of area (point counting method) and diameter performed on image. Transversal diameter (TD), vertical diameter (VD), dorsal horn (DH), ventral horn (VH), transversal diameter of central canal (TDCC), vertical diameter of central canal (VDCC). Red points are used to calculate the area of gross section, green points are used to measure the area of dorsal horn, and yellow points are used to calculate the area of ventral horn.The positive image scan option of a standard flatbed office scanner was used to obtain images for the measurements because the viewing area on the light and dissection microscope of the cross-section was large. Original-sized images (JPG, 600 DPI) of the sections were taken with this application (Figure1). An imaging system adapted to the light microscope was used to obtain images to be used for measurement of the central canal (Figure 1). All images of the segments were kept separate by ordering them from the cranial to caudal direction on a PC for later analysis.Measurements of VD and TD were performed on images taken from the GS and CC using ImageJ software (Figure1). The mean value of the diameter obtained for each segment was recorded as the microscopic diameter value. The compression value of GS and CC was calculated using the following formula: VD/TD*100.A point-counting grid was used to determine the area of the image of each section [10, 24]. ImageJ was calibrated first, and the grid function of the software was used to calculate the GS area of the cervical segments and its subcomponents. The area per point (a/p) was set for GS and WM at 6 mm2, for GM, DH, and VH at 0.6 mm2, and for CC at 3 μm2. The grids were superimposed randomly on the section images (Figure 1). The total number of hits on each compartment of the SC was counted three times. The average of the total number of points was represented as  ∑p. The area and volume of each compartment of the SC were calculated using the formulas numbered (1) and (2), respectively. Consider
(1)A(mean)=∑p*a(p)Sn,(2)Vest=∑p*a(p)*t.Sn represents the number of tissue samples taken from a segment; t indicates the distance between two consecutive sections. Coefficient of error (CE) values were calculated according to Sahin and Ergur [26].


### 2.5. Statistical Analysis

The values were expressed as mean and standard error (mean ± SE). The diameters, areas, and volumes of cervical segments were compared using the Duncan test. The Pearson correlation test was also applied to investigate relationships among morphometric data values (SPSS 13.0).P<0.05 was accepted statistically significant.


## 2.1. Animals

The present study was performed on the SC of five horses of different breeds and sex (a 12-year-old male Thoroughbred weighing 450 kg, a 10-year-old male Thoroughbred weighing 420 kg, a 15-year-old male Belgian horse weighing 480 kg, a 13-year-old female Arabian horse weighing 300 kg, and a 15-year-old female Shetland pony weighing 230 kg) that were scheduled for euthanasia upon being diagnosed with various orthopedic disorders after referral to the Equestrian Facilities of Selcuk University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine. The study protocol was approved by the Ethic Committee. The animals were anaesthetized by administration of 10% chloral hydrate (80 mg/kg, I.V.) [21] and killed under general anesthesia afterwards; 10% neutral formalin solution was perfused via the common carotid artery.


## 2.2. Dissection, Extraction, and Segmentation

Dissection was performed ten days after the fixation procedure. The brain was opened with a dorsal approach, and the SC was exposed by laminectomy. The SC was cut transversally in front of the roots of theC1 spinal nerve, preserving the dura mater, and removed from the brainstem. The spinal dura mater and arachnoid mater were opened dorsally. The border between the two segments was determined as described previously [2]. Segmentation of the SC was completed by cutting transversally from the indicated points, except for the caudal segments.


## 2.3. Macroscopic Measurements

The length and diameter of each segment was measured using digital calipers, and segment volume was assessed by Archimedes’ principle. All segments were weighed with an assay balance (0.01 g). Only weight and volume measurements were performed on the brain.


## 2.4. Stereological Design and Microscopic Analysis

Volume parameters were utilized using Cavalieri’s principle. The following steps were included in this method: tissue sampling, determination of surface area, and volume calculation [10, 22, 23].The segments were sampled in accordance with a systematic random sampling principle before the histological procedures [10, 24]. For this procedure, a tissue slicer was prepared with microtome blades that were placed at 3.8 mm intervals, parallel to one another. The segments were placed perpendicular to the blades on the slicer so that the first tissue section was taken at random. All slabs belonging to the C1 and C8 segments were taken without sampling, while slabs taken from the other segments were sampled in 1/2 and 1/3 ratios. Slabs (8 or 13) were taken from the segments at the end of this procedure. All the slabs were numbered from a cranial to caudal direction and placed in trays, protecting their cranial cut surfaces. All the sections were dehydrated according to Bolat et al. [25], and paraffin blocks were prepared. One section from the first 30 consecutive sections taken from the paraffin block was obtained randomly using a rotary microtome at 10 μm thickness and mounted on to a gelatinized glass slide. The sections were stored in a thermostatically controlled oven at 37°C for 24 hours and subsequently stained with modified May-Grunwald-Giemsa (Figure 1) [25]. The distance between two consecutive sections after the histological procedure was 3.4 mm for C1 and C8 segments, 6.8 mm for 1/2 percent sampled segments and 10.2 mm for 1/3 percent sampled segments.Figure 1
Gross-section of the spinal cord (scanned image), central canal (microscopic image), and measurements of area (point counting method) and diameter performed on image. Transversal diameter (TD), vertical diameter (VD), dorsal horn (DH), ventral horn (VH), transversal diameter of central canal (TDCC), vertical diameter of central canal (VDCC). Red points are used to calculate the area of gross section, green points are used to measure the area of dorsal horn, and yellow points are used to calculate the area of ventral horn.The positive image scan option of a standard flatbed office scanner was used to obtain images for the measurements because the viewing area on the light and dissection microscope of the cross-section was large. Original-sized images (JPG, 600 DPI) of the sections were taken with this application (Figure1). An imaging system adapted to the light microscope was used to obtain images to be used for measurement of the central canal (Figure 1). All images of the segments were kept separate by ordering them from the cranial to caudal direction on a PC for later analysis.Measurements of VD and TD were performed on images taken from the GS and CC using ImageJ software (Figure1). The mean value of the diameter obtained for each segment was recorded as the microscopic diameter value. The compression value of GS and CC was calculated using the following formula: VD/TD*100.A point-counting grid was used to determine the area of the image of each section [10, 24]. ImageJ was calibrated first, and the grid function of the software was used to calculate the GS area of the cervical segments and its subcomponents. The area per point (a/p) was set for GS and WM at 6 mm2, for GM, DH, and VH at 0.6 mm2, and for CC at 3 μm2. The grids were superimposed randomly on the section images (Figure 1). The total number of hits on each compartment of the SC was counted three times. The average of the total number of points was represented as  ∑p. The area and volume of each compartment of the SC were calculated using the formulas numbered (1) and (2), respectively. Consider
(1)A(mean)=∑p*a(p)Sn,(2)Vest=∑p*a(p)*t.Sn represents the number of tissue samples taken from a segment; t indicates the distance between two consecutive sections. Coefficient of error (CE) values were calculated according to Sahin and Ergur [26].


## 2.5. Statistical Analysis

The values were expressed as mean and standard error (mean ± SE). The diameters, areas, and volumes of cervical segments were compared using the Duncan test. The Pearson correlation test was also applied to investigate relationships among morphometric data values (SPSS 13.0).P<0.05 was accepted statistically significant.


## 3. Results

The body weight of the animals used in the study, the weight of the fixed brain and SC, weight, length, and volume of the CSC, and the ratios and relative organ weight of the SC are given in Table1.Table 1
The body weights of the animals used in the study and some morphometric measurements for the brains, cervical spinal cords, and spinal cords after neutral formalin fixation.
Pony
Arabian
Belgium
TB I
TB II
Mean ± SE
Body weight (kg)
230
300
480
420
450
376 ± 47.6
Brain
Weight (g)
455
490
570
590
555
532 ± 25.5
Volume (cm3)
425
475
550
560
540
510 ± 25.9
SC
Weight (g)
207.2
186.3
305.9
267.0
281.6
249.6 ± 22.7
Length (cm)
142.9
156.2
178.4
175.6
182.8
167.2 ± 7.6
Volume (cm3)
204.7
180.3
297.1
270.9
283.7
247.3 ± 23.1
CSC
Weight (g)
87.8
77.3
130.8
116.6
123.4
107.2 ± 10.4
Length(cm)
51.4
56.1
65.2
66.0
67.5
61.2 ± 3.2
Volume (cm3)
77.4
73.5
111.7
104.1
110.8
95.5 ± 8.3
Ratio CSC/SC
Weight
42.4
41.5
42.8
43.7
43.8
42.8 ± 0.4
Length
36.0
35.9
36.5
37.6
36.9
36.6 ± 0.3
Volume
37.8
40.8
37.6
38.4
39.0
38.7 ± 0.6
RW
SC
0.090
0.062
0.064
0.064
0.063
0.068 ± 0.005
CSC
0.038
0.026
0.027
0.028
0.027
0.029 ± 0.002
Spinal cord (SC), cervical spinal cord (CSC), relative weight (RW), and Thoroughbred (TB). Volume data were obtained by application of Archimedes’ principle.


### 3.1. Segment Lengths and Diameters

It was observed that segment length increased fromC1 to C3 and decreased from C3 to C8 regularly, in both macroscopic and microscopic measurements (Figure 2(a)). The average 11.7% difference in the length of the CSC between measurements made by the two methods was caused by tissue shrinkage during the histological preparation. Segment diameters measured using digital calipers and the mean diameters of the GS of these segments are given in Figure 2(b). The shortest and longest TD of the SC segments was identified in C3 and C8, respectively. Although C4 had the shortest VD, there were no statistically significant differences among the VD values of the segments (Figure 1(b), P>0.05). Tissue shrinkage for the TD and VD was determined 14.18% and 16.66%, respectively. Although C6 had the longest transverse diameter of CC (TDCC) (387.92 μm), there were no statistically significant differences among the TDCC of the segments (Figure 2(c), P>0.05). The longest and shortest vertical diameters of the CC (VDCCs) were seen in C1 and C7, and this diameter decreased regularly from C1 to C7 (Figure 2(c), P<0.05). Compression ratios of GS and CC showed statistically significant differences, and this ratio decreased from C1 to C8 (Figure 2(d), P<0.05).Length (a), diameters (b and c), and compression ratio (d) of cervical spinal cord segments. (a–e) Different letters on the top of columns of the same colour are statistically significant (Duncan test,P<0.05, mean ± SE).
(a)
Macroscopic (Mac; using digital caliper after segmentation) and microscopic (Mic; calculated after histological processing) length measurements of the cervical spinal cord segments
(b)
Macroscopic (using digital caliper) transvers (Mac TD) and vertical (Mac VD) diameters and microscopic (using ImageJ after histological processing) transvers (Mic TD) and vertical (Mic VD) diameters
(c)
Transvers (TDCC) and vertical (VDCC) diameters (using ImageJ) of the central canal
(d)
Gross-sections (GS) and central canal (CC) of compression ratio


### 3.2. Cross-Sectional Areas of Segment Subcomponents

The mean areas of the segment subcomponents (GS, WM, GM, DH, VH, and CC) are given in Table2, and the variation in the area and area ratio of GM, DH, and VH of the segments are represented in Figures 3(a) and 3(c). While the highest area values of GS, WM, and GM were determined in C8, the highest area value of CC was seen in C3 (Table 2). The area and area ratio of GM increased from C4 to C8, and VH contributed to this increment more than DH (Table 2 and Figures 3(a) and 3(c)).Table 2
Areas and volumes of subcomponents of the cervical spinal cord segments (mean ± SE,n=5).
Area (mm2)
Segment
GS
WM
GM
DH
VH
CC × 10−3
C
1
132 ± 9.9c
115 ± 9.8b
16.5 ± 0.7c
10.9 ± 0.7a
5.6 ± 0.2cd
58.9 ± 4.3a
C
2
127 ± 8.5c
115 ± 8.1b
11.2 ± 0.6e
6.6 ± 0.4c
4.6 ± 0.2e
58.1 ± 3.5a
C
3
120 ± 7.5c
111 ± 7.3b
9.1 ± 0.3f
5.2 ± 0.2d
3.9 ± 0.2e
59.1 ± 5.7a
C
4
124 ± 8.6c
115 ± 8.3b
9.0 ± 0.3f
5.1 ± 0.2d
3.9 ± 0.3e
53.3 ± 2.6a
C
5
134 ± 8.7c
123 ± 8.2ab
10.3 ± 0.5ef
5.5 ± 0.3cd
4.7 ± 0.3de
50.9 ± 5.8ab
C
6
147 ± 10.4bc
134 ± 9.8ab
12.8 ± 0.6d
6.6 ± 0.3c
6.2 ± 0.4c
48.7 ± 6.1ab
C
7
169 ± 5.0ab
147 ± 5.3a
22.1 ± 0.4b
9.5 ± 0.3b
12.6 ± 0.4b
38.3 ± 4.8b
C
8
175 ± 8.0a
147 ± 7.7a
27.8 ± 0.6a
11.5 ± 0.5a
16.4 ± 0.4a
37.1 ± 2.8b
Volume (*cm3, mm3)
Segment
Arc*
Total
WM
GM
DH
VH
CC × 10−3
C
1
5.7 ± 0.4c
3884 ± 387c
3402 ± 370c
483 ± 30c
319 ± 24b
164 ± 9c
1.7 ± 0.12d
C
2
14.2 ± 1.5ab
10040 ± 1187a
9159 ± 1114a
880 ± 80b
521 ± 49a
359 ± 34b
4.5 ± 0.27abc
C
3
17.1 ± 1.8a
11693 ± 1679a
10813 ± 1587a
880 ± 99b
502 ± 48a
378 ± 54b
5.6 ± 0.50a
C
4
16.9 ± 1.8a
11731 ± 1313a
10884 ± 1247a
847 ± 66b
477 ± 36a
370 ± 34b
5.00 ± 0.33ab
C
5
15.9 ± 1.8ab
11207 ± 1268a
10349 ± 1187a
858 ± 82b
465 ± 53a
392 ± 36b
4.2 ± 0.57bc
C
6
14.6 ± 1.3ab
10387 ± 972a
9480 ± 915a
906 ± 59b
468 ± 36a
439 ± 28b
3.5 ± 0.58c
C
7
11.7 ± 0.9abc
8956 ± 670ab
7790 ± 621ab
1167 ± 61a
503 ± 36a
664 ± 32a
2.1 ± 0.33d
C
8
8.9 ± 1.0bc
6462 ± 5887bc
5441 ± 527bc
1022 ± 65ab
425 ± 41ab
597 ± 25a
1.4 ± 0.13d
Mean CE
0.044
0.046
0.046
0.052
0.054
0.053
Gross sections (GSs), white matter (WM), grey matter (GM), dorsal horn (DH), ventral horn (VH), central canal (CC). *Segment volumes calculated using Archimedes’ principle after segmentation. Other volumetric measurements were obtained using the Cavalieri’s principle. Coefficient of error mean (mean CE) was calculated according to Sahin and Ergur (2006) [26].
a–f: Different letters in the same column are statistically significant (Duncan test, P<0.05).Grey matter (GM), dorsal horn (DH), and ventral horn (VH) of the segments, area (a), volume (b), and area ratio (GM/GS, DH/GM, and VH/GM) (c).
(a)
(b)
(c)


### 3.3. Segment Volumes

Segment volumes measured by Archimedes’ principle (before paraffin embedding) and the volumes of total segments and subcomponents (WM, GM, DH, VH, and CC) measured with Cavalieri’s principle are given in Table2. Variations in the volume of the GM, DH and VH of the segments are represented in Figure 3(b). Although C4 had the highest total segment volume and WM, C2 and C6 had similar volumes of total segment and WM statistically (P>0.05, Table 2). The difference in the total segment volume (29.3%) between measurements made using Archimedes’ and Cavalieri’s principles was accepted as tissue shrinkage caused by histological processing.


### 3.4. Correlation Analysis

The results of the analysis of correlations among the morphometric parameters are given in Table3.Table 3
Relationships among microscopic measurements of the cervical spinal cords (n=5).
Length
Diameter
Area
Volume
TD
VD
TDCC
VDCC
GS
WM
GM
CC
Total
WM
GM
CC
0.892***
−0.649***
−0.467**
0.003
0.279
−0.533***
−0.405**
−0.784***
0.643***
0.680***
0.702***
0.088
Volume
GM
0.312
0.195
0.141
−0.146
−0.251
0.660***
0.691***
0.348*
−0.419**
0.617***
0.573***
WM
0.911***
−0.431**
−0.128
−0.032
0.251
0.067
0.234
−0.506**
0.006
0.998***
Total
0.895***
−0.400*
−0.114
−0.04
0.224
0.108
0.271
−0.462**
−0.022
CC
0.265
−0.585***
−0.535***
0.028
0.262
−0.697***
−0.678***
−0.541***
Area
GM
−0.747***
0.656***
0.312
−0.097
−0.409**
0.751***
0.603***
WM
−0.164
0.28
0.278
−0.054
−0.069
0.980***
GS
−0.324*
0.397*
0.309
−0.069
−0.16
VDCC
0.264
−0.545***
−0.115
−0.01
Diameter
TDCC
−0.029
−0.132
−0.346*
VD
−0.265
0.589***
TD
−0.535***
Transverse (TD) and vertical (VD) diameters of the segments, transverse (TDCC) and vertical (VDCC) diameters of central canal, gross section (GS), white matter (WM), grey matter (GM), and central canal (CC) area, spinal cord segments (total), and white matter (WM), grey matter (GM), and central canal (CC) volumes. Pearson’s coefficient:*P<0.05, **P<0.01,  and ***P<0.001.


## 3.1. Segment Lengths and Diameters

It was observed that segment length increased fromC1 to C3 and decreased from C3 to C8 regularly, in both macroscopic and microscopic measurements (Figure 2(a)). The average 11.7% difference in the length of the CSC between measurements made by the two methods was caused by tissue shrinkage during the histological preparation. Segment diameters measured using digital calipers and the mean diameters of the GS of these segments are given in Figure 2(b). The shortest and longest TD of the SC segments was identified in C3 and C8, respectively. Although C4 had the shortest VD, there were no statistically significant differences among the VD values of the segments (Figure 1(b), P>0.05). Tissue shrinkage for the TD and VD was determined 14.18% and 16.66%, respectively. Although C6 had the longest transverse diameter of CC (TDCC) (387.92 μm), there were no statistically significant differences among the TDCC of the segments (Figure 2(c), P>0.05). The longest and shortest vertical diameters of the CC (VDCCs) were seen in C1 and C7, and this diameter decreased regularly from C1 to C7 (Figure 2(c), P<0.05). Compression ratios of GS and CC showed statistically significant differences, and this ratio decreased from C1 to C8 (Figure 2(d), P<0.05).Length (a), diameters (b and c), and compression ratio (d) of cervical spinal cord segments. (a–e) Different letters on the top of columns of the same colour are statistically significant (Duncan test,P<0.05, mean ± SE).
(a)
Macroscopic (Mac; using digital caliper after segmentation) and microscopic (Mic; calculated after histological processing) length measurements of the cervical spinal cord segments
(b)
Macroscopic (using digital caliper) transvers (Mac TD) and vertical (Mac VD) diameters and microscopic (using ImageJ after histological processing) transvers (Mic TD) and vertical (Mic VD) diameters
(c)
Transvers (TDCC) and vertical (VDCC) diameters (using ImageJ) of the central canal
(d)
Gross-sections (GS) and central canal (CC) of compression ratio


## 3.2. Cross-Sectional Areas of Segment Subcomponents

The mean areas of the segment subcomponents (GS, WM, GM, DH, VH, and CC) are given in Table2, and the variation in the area and area ratio of GM, DH, and VH of the segments are represented in Figures 3(a) and 3(c). While the highest area values of GS, WM, and GM were determined in C8, the highest area value of CC was seen in C3 (Table 2). The area and area ratio of GM increased from C4 to C8, and VH contributed to this increment more than DH (Table 2 and Figures 3(a) and 3(c)).Table 2
Areas and volumes of subcomponents of the cervical spinal cord segments (mean ± SE,n=5).
Area (mm2)
Segment
GS
WM
GM
DH
VH
CC × 10−3
C
1
132 ± 9.9c
115 ± 9.8b
16.5 ± 0.7c
10.9 ± 0.7a
5.6 ± 0.2cd
58.9 ± 4.3a
C
2
127 ± 8.5c
115 ± 8.1b
11.2 ± 0.6e
6.6 ± 0.4c
4.6 ± 0.2e
58.1 ± 3.5a
C
3
120 ± 7.5c
111 ± 7.3b
9.1 ± 0.3f
5.2 ± 0.2d
3.9 ± 0.2e
59.1 ± 5.7a
C
4
124 ± 8.6c
115 ± 8.3b
9.0 ± 0.3f
5.1 ± 0.2d
3.9 ± 0.3e
53.3 ± 2.6a
C
5
134 ± 8.7c
123 ± 8.2ab
10.3 ± 0.5ef
5.5 ± 0.3cd
4.7 ± 0.3de
50.9 ± 5.8ab
C
6
147 ± 10.4bc
134 ± 9.8ab
12.8 ± 0.6d
6.6 ± 0.3c
6.2 ± 0.4c
48.7 ± 6.1ab
C
7
169 ± 5.0ab
147 ± 5.3a
22.1 ± 0.4b
9.5 ± 0.3b
12.6 ± 0.4b
38.3 ± 4.8b
C
8
175 ± 8.0a
147 ± 7.7a
27.8 ± 0.6a
11.5 ± 0.5a
16.4 ± 0.4a
37.1 ± 2.8b
Volume (*cm3, mm3)
Segment
Arc*
Total
WM
GM
DH
VH
CC × 10−3
C
1
5.7 ± 0.4c
3884 ± 387c
3402 ± 370c
483 ± 30c
319 ± 24b
164 ± 9c
1.7 ± 0.12d
C
2
14.2 ± 1.5ab
10040 ± 1187a
9159 ± 1114a
880 ± 80b
521 ± 49a
359 ± 34b
4.5 ± 0.27abc
C
3
17.1 ± 1.8a
11693 ± 1679a
10813 ± 1587a
880 ± 99b
502 ± 48a
378 ± 54b
5.6 ± 0.50a
C
4
16.9 ± 1.8a
11731 ± 1313a
10884 ± 1247a
847 ± 66b
477 ± 36a
370 ± 34b
5.00 ± 0.33ab
C
5
15.9 ± 1.8ab
11207 ± 1268a
10349 ± 1187a
858 ± 82b
465 ± 53a
392 ± 36b
4.2 ± 0.57bc
C
6
14.6 ± 1.3ab
10387 ± 972a
9480 ± 915a
906 ± 59b
468 ± 36a
439 ± 28b
3.5 ± 0.58c
C
7
11.7 ± 0.9abc
8956 ± 670ab
7790 ± 621ab
1167 ± 61a
503 ± 36a
664 ± 32a
2.1 ± 0.33d
C
8
8.9 ± 1.0bc
6462 ± 5887bc
5441 ± 527bc
1022 ± 65ab
425 ± 41ab
597 ± 25a
1.4 ± 0.13d
Mean CE
0.044
0.046
0.046
0.052
0.054
0.053
Gross sections (GSs), white matter (WM), grey matter (GM), dorsal horn (DH), ventral horn (VH), central canal (CC). *Segment volumes calculated using Archimedes’ principle after segmentation. Other volumetric measurements were obtained using the Cavalieri’s principle. Coefficient of error mean (mean CE) was calculated according to Sahin and Ergur (2006) [26].
a–f: Different letters in the same column are statistically significant (Duncan test, P<0.05).Grey matter (GM), dorsal horn (DH), and ventral horn (VH) of the segments, area (a), volume (b), and area ratio (GM/GS, DH/GM, and VH/GM) (c).
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.3. Segment Volumes

Segment volumes measured by Archimedes’ principle (before paraffin embedding) and the volumes of total segments and subcomponents (WM, GM, DH, VH, and CC) measured with Cavalieri’s principle are given in Table2. Variations in the volume of the GM, DH and VH of the segments are represented in Figure 3(b). Although C4 had the highest total segment volume and WM, C2 and C6 had similar volumes of total segment and WM statistically (P>0.05, Table 2). The difference in the total segment volume (29.3%) between measurements made using Archimedes’ and Cavalieri’s principles was accepted as tissue shrinkage caused by histological processing.


## 3.4. Correlation Analysis

The results of the analysis of correlations among the morphometric parameters are given in Table3.Table 3
Relationships among microscopic measurements of the cervical spinal cords (n=5).
Length
Diameter
Area
Volume
TD
VD
TDCC
VDCC
GS
WM
GM
CC
Total
WM
GM
CC
0.892***
−0.649***
−0.467**
0.003
0.279
−0.533***
−0.405**
−0.784***
0.643***
0.680***
0.702***
0.088
Volume
GM
0.312
0.195
0.141
−0.146
−0.251
0.660***
0.691***
0.348*
−0.419**
0.617***
0.573***
WM
0.911***
−0.431**
−0.128
−0.032
0.251
0.067
0.234
−0.506**
0.006
0.998***
Total
0.895***
−0.400*
−0.114
−0.04
0.224
0.108
0.271
−0.462**
−0.022
CC
0.265
−0.585***
−0.535***
0.028
0.262
−0.697***
−0.678***
−0.541***
Area
GM
−0.747***
0.656***
0.312
−0.097
−0.409**
0.751***
0.603***
WM
−0.164
0.28
0.278
−0.054
−0.069
0.980***
GS
−0.324*
0.397*
0.309
−0.069
−0.16
VDCC
0.264
−0.545***
−0.115
−0.01
Diameter
TDCC
−0.029
−0.132
−0.346*
VD
−0.265
0.589***
TD
−0.535***
Transverse (TD) and vertical (VD) diameters of the segments, transverse (TDCC) and vertical (VDCC) diameters of central canal, gross section (GS), white matter (WM), grey matter (GM), and central canal (CC) area, spinal cord segments (total), and white matter (WM), grey matter (GM), and central canal (CC) volumes. Pearson’s coefficient:*P<0.05, **P<0.01,  and ***P<0.001.


## 4. Discussion

The weight ratio of SC to the total weight of the central nervous system was 2% in the human, 6% in the gorilla, 23% in the dog, 30% in the cat, 40% in the horse, and 47% in the cow [27]. In the present study, we found the weight ratio to be 31.9% and the volume ratio to be 32.6% in the horse (Table 1).In this study, lengths of CSC and SC were 61.2 and 167.2 cm, while a percent ratio of CSC/CS was 36.9% in the horse (Table1). It has been reported that the lengths of CSC and SC in donkey [28], goat [29], brocket [30], mouse [15], and human [31] are 37.7–106.8 cm, 16.4–53.8 cm, 17.5–61.5 cm, 10.2–44 mm, and 9.4–43.1 cm, and percent ratios of CSC/CS of previously mentioned species are 35.3, 30.4, 28.5, 23.4, and 21.5, respectively. Barson and Sands [31] reported the weight of fresh SC and CSC of human to be 28.3–9.2 g (32.5%); these values were 249.6 and 107.2 g (42.8%) in the current study (Table 1). The length of the SC in domestic animals is directly proportional to the length of the vertebral column. The ratio of length and weight of the CSC of horse is greater than in other species, and this may be a result of the extended length of the cervical vertebral column in the horse when compared with other species. However, cervical segment length increased from C1 to C3 and decreased regularly from C3 to C8 in the horse, similar to the dog [32], donkey [33], and goat [29]. C1 was found to be the shortest segment, as reported in the dog, while C8 is reported to be the shortest segment in the donkey and goat (Figure 2(a)). The longest and the shortest segments were reported in sheep [34] and impala [35] to be C2 and C8, respectively.The TD and VD of the segments are parameters that are used routinely in research, such as in postmortem [1, 3, 36] or medical imaging studies [5, 8, 37, 38], and as a morphometric or diagnostic tool for SC diseases. Measurements in medical imaging studies have been performed mostly by manual segmentation or by considering the vertebrae because it is difficult to differentiate the segment boundaries [8, 9, 18]. The longest and the shortest TD values have been reported for C2,  C7, and C8 of the horse [3], C3,  C7, and C8 of the donkey [28], C2 and C6 of the human (except C1) [36, 39], and  C5  and C8 (except C1 and C2) of the human [1], respectively, in previous research. In the current study, while TD decreased from C1 to C3, there was a regular increment from C3 to C8, and the highest TD value was found in C8 (Figure 2(b)). However, there was no statistically significant difference among the first five cervical segments in terms of TD (Figure 2(b), P>0.05). Although the shortest and the longest VDs were found in C4 and C8, respectively, there was no statistically significant difference in VD (P>0.05, Figure 2(b)). A similar situation has been observed in other studies conducted on the horse [3] and donkey [28]. However, the VD of human CSC is reported to decrease regularly from C1 to C8 in post-mortem histological studies [36, 39] and in antemortem studies using CT [40, 41] and MRI [7]. The ratio of the transverse diameter to the vertical diameter has been reported as the compression ratio in dogs [5] and humans [6, 36], and it has been used to evaluate pathological conditions. While this ratio gives simple information about the cross-sectional shape of the segments, it can also be used in comparisons among species. Thus, the compression ratio of the CSC of the horse (Figure 2(d)) in our study was very similar to compression ratios calculated using the results of a previous study conducted by Ocal and Haziroglu [28], whereas it was not similar to the compression ratios of the dog [5] and human [36]. VD can be used to determine lesion borders in lateral radiography, which is frequently preferred in the diagnosis of compressive disease of the CSC, and the compression ratio can be used as a morphometric parameter to diagnose pathological conditions of the CSC of the horse, like in dogs [5] and humans [6, 36, 42].Occlusion of the central canal has been reported to start at 1-year-old human; after the fourth decade, the canal is completely occluded, except for the cervical segments, and in nine decades, the central canal of the entire SC is totally occluded [43, 44]. Although the diameter of the central canal in the dog [45] is known to be associated with ageing, no information about occlusion of central canal caused by ageing, except in association with pathological conditions, has been found in the literature. It could be said that the central canal of healthy domestic animals is more functional and stable than that of humans, and thus it has a specific morphometry. Morphometric characteristics of the central canal of the segments were examined in detail in the current research (Figures 2(c) and 2(d) and Table 2), and correlations between these morphometric data and other data from the segments were observed (Table 3). It was reported that the central canal was flattened dorsoventrally, especially in C3 and C4 of the horse [3], but in the donkey, it was flattened in C1 and between C6 and C8, it was rounded in C2 and C5, and it was flattened laterally in C3 and C4 [28]. In the current research, the shape of the central canal, which was flattened dorsoventrally, and the transverse diameter of the central canal was found to be similar to those reported in a previous study conducted by Braun [3] (however, the latter used only two animals), while the vertical diameter was different in the two studies. Although changes in the form of the central canal are seen in cross-sections taken from the affected area of the SC in congenital malformations and compressive disease of the cord, this subject has not been mentioned in detail in the literature [36, 46]. The central canal is a cerebrospinal fluid-filled space in the SC, and because it can be affected by pathological conditions, we think that it is appropriate to be taken into consideration in such situations.It has been reported thatC6 (134 mm2) had the largest and C2 (86 mm2) had the smallest areas of GS; C8 had the largest (21.25 mm2) and C2 had the smallest areas of GM in the horse (n=2) [3]. The largest and the smallest area of GS and GM were found in C8  (125 mm2) and C3  (89 mm2), C8  (25 mm2) and C4  (7 mm2). In humans these values were C6 (58.5±7.2 mm2) and  C8  (51.2±5.3 mm2), C7 (10.7±1.3 mm2) and  C3 (7.2±1.2 mm2), respectively (n=12) [36]. The same writers reported that the value of GM increased from C2 (5.5%) in the horse, C4 (7.6%) in the donkey, and C3 (13.6%) in the human to C8 (17.6%, 19.84%, and 20.4%). Whereas C3 and  C8 had the largest and the smallest areas of GS, the area of grey matter decreased from C1 (55%) to C8 (32%) in a study conducted on rats [47]. In the current research, the largest and the smallest areas of GS and GM were detected at C8 and C3, C8 and C4 respectively. The GS areas of the first five segments were detected to be similar statistically, but the GM areas of only C3 and C4 were similar (Table 2, P>0.05). The area of GM was determined to increase regularly from C4 (7.22%) to C8 (15.81%) (Figures 3(a) and 3(c)). Although our results were consistent with the results for the donkey [28], they were not compatible with the morphometric data for the horse reported by Braun [3]. Portiansky et al. [47] reported that morphometric differences between rats and other mammals are caused by the difference in the size and the number of neurons in the cord.The morphological features of the DH and VH of cervical segments have been published in detail for the horse [3] and donkey [28]. These constituents of GM were evaluated morphometrically for the first time in the present study. It was seen that DH had the largest area in C1 and C8 and the smallest area in C3 and C4. VH had the largest area in C8 and the smallest area in C2 and C4. An inverse relationship was found between ratios in the ventral and dorsal horn, and at the C6 level, their areas, volumes, and ratios were almost equal (Table 2 and Figure 3).Linear and volumetric changes in the brain have been investigated in detail after formalin fixation and paraffin embedding in previous research [48, 49]; however, the effect of these methods on the SC is not known. The transverse cross-sectional area was reduced by 13%-14% in the SC of rats [47], the human brain stem was reduced by 11%-12% transversally and 17% longitudinally [49], and the volumes of cerebral tissue [50], cerebral cortex, and WM [48] were decreased by 48%, 49%, and 58%, respectively, after paraffin embedding. In the current study, although the transverse cross-sectional area was not calculated before paraffin embedding, TD was reduced by 14.2%, VD by 16.66%, longitudinal shrinkage was 11.91%, and volumetric shrinkage of 29.3% was observed when the values for the diameters and volumes of the CSC determined before and after paraffin embedding were compared. Our results are compatible with previous results, except for longitudinal shrinkage, but there were differences in the materials and tissues. It is thought that the variation in volumetric shrinkage between cerebral tissue and the SC could be caused by the anatomical organization of tissues.Positive correlations were reported between the TD and VD of CSC segments, and positive correlations were also reported among VD or GS areas and total segment volumes (P<0.05) [1]. In the present study, a positive correlation was found between TD and VD or GS areas, a negative correlation between TD and total segment volume, and a positive correlation between the VD and DH and VH volumes, and there was no statistically significant difference between the GS area and total segment volume (Table 3).


## 5. Conclusion

The results of this study, in which detailed morphometric features of the CSC of mature horse were determined using stereological methods for the first time, will contribute to the knowledge of the related anatomical structures and can also be used as reference values by veterinary pathologists and clinicians for the quantitative evaluation of CSC disease.



---

*Source: 734923-2013-02-07.xml*