# Kenaf Bast Fibers—Part II: Inorganic Nanoparticle Impregnation for Polymer Composites

Authors: Jinshu Shi; Sheldon Q. Shi; H. Michael Barnes; Mark F. Horstemeyer; Ge Wang
Journal: International Journal of Polymer Science
 (2011)

---

## Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate an inorganic nanoparticle impregnation (INI) technique to improve the compatibility between kenaf bast fibers and polyolefin matrices. The Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was used to examine the surface morphology of the INI-treated fibers showing that the CaCO3 nanoparticle crystals grew onto the fiber surface. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was used to verify the CaCO3 nanoparticle deposits on the fiber surface. The tension tests of the individual fiber were conducted, and the results showed that the tensile strength of the fibers increased significantly (more than 20%) after the INI treatments. Polymer composites were fabricated using the INI-treated fiber as reinforcement and polypropylene (PP) as the matrix. The results showed that the INI treatments improved the compatibility between kenaf fibers and PP matrix. The tensile modulus and tensile strength of the composites reinforced with INI-treated fibers increased by 25.9% and 10.4%, respectively, compared to those reinforced with untreated kenaf fibers.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Lignocellulosic fiber is a renewable and biodegradable natural polymer which has been used in a variety of applications, such as textile, pulp and paper, and so forth. In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in utilizing natural fibers to replace synthetic glass or carbon fibers to fabricate sheet molding compound (SMC) composites for automobile structural component design. Natural fibers are light weight, economical and environmentally friendly. However, in the processing of lignocellulosic fiber-reinforced polymer composites, the following issues should be addressed. The cell wall structure of natural fibers contains many micropores. If a chemical pulping process is used, additional micropores would be created since some of the lignin and hemicellulose of natural fibers are removed [1]. The presence of these micropores in the cell wall structure could cause manufacturing defects in composites, such as interfacial failure and air pockets. Compatibility between the fiber surface and polymer matrix has been a major issue for lignocellulosic fiber-reinforced polymer composites processing [2–5]. As it was reported in the first paper of this series [6] that the kenaf fibers retted using an alkaline solution by a hermetical process had poor compatibility with the polypropylene (PP) matrix resulting in delaminations of the composites. A common way to improve the compatibility between the cellulosic natural fibers and the polymer matrix is to use coupling agents [7]. However, the organic coupling agents are usually costly and also cause environmental concern. Previous study indicated that the deposited nanoparticles on the fiber surface served as nucleation sites to initiate the crystalline orientation of the molten polymer matrix [8]. Therefore, a proper process to introduce nanoparticles onto the fiber surface serving as attraction force manipulators to polyolefin matrixes has a potential to improve the crystalline formation in the polymer matrix. Since the mechanical behavior of a composite material strongly depends on the adhesion between the reinforced fibers and the matrix, the properties of the composites should be enhanced [9].Directly impregnating the commercial nanoparticles into the micropore cell wall structure of the cellulosic nature fibers can be difficult and costly. For the inorganic nanoparticle impregnation (INI) process in this study, the primary salt, Na2CO3, and secondary ionic salt, CaCl2, were impregnated into micropores of the fiber cell wall consecutively. The two chemicals react at certain temperature and pressure conditions, and the inorganic nanoparticles of CaCO3 are formed. The chemical reaction is described as follows:(1)CaCl2⋅H2O+Na2CO3→H2OCaCO3+2NaCl+2H2O.
The INI technology has been used in pulp, paper, and surface coating industries [10]. The main purpose of INI in pulp and paper was to improve the printability of the papers. The inorganic nanoparticles loaded into cell wall and on the surface may provide strong static electric attractive forces to nonpolar polymer surface [11], and hence the compatibility between the fibers and the polymer matrix may be improved. These nanoparticle-impregnated fibers can be incorporated readily into the existing manufacturing process to make fiber sheets for composite products. The impregnation of the inorganic nanoparticles into the micropore structure of the fiber cell walls can reduce the microvoid volumes in the fiber, as well as reduce air bubble formation during the composite fabrication process. This process is low cost (using inexpensive ionic salts), has little environmental concern (weak chemical solutions are used and can be reused), and simple (the inorganic nanoparticles form directly). The products can be potentially used as vehicle components because of their light-weight, good mechanical properties and environmental friendliness.In this study, the kenaf bast fibers retted from the hermetical alkaline process were further treated with INI processes. The objectives of this study were to optimize the INI process for the kenaf bast fibers and to evaluate the potentials on the property improvement for the kenaf fiber-PP composites.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

The Kenaf stalks were obtained from MSU North Farm. After the separation of the kenaf core and bast, the bast was cut into 50.8 mm lengths and dried to a moisture content of 7.4% at 103°C. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution (5%, w/v) prepared with NaOH beads (Lab grade, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) and distilled water was used as digestion agent. Glacial acetic acid (17.4 N, Regent grade, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) was used as a pH neutralizer. Sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) aqueous solutions (0.1 mol/L) and calcium chloride (CaCl2) aqueous solutions (0.1 mol/L and 0.2 mol/L) were prepared, respectively, using distilled water. The sodium carbonate and calcium chloride were supplied by Fisher Scientific Inc. Polypropylene (PP) films (CO-EX Oriented Polypropylene), provided by Plastic Suppliers, Inc. Dallas, Tex, USA, and were used to fabricate kenaf fiber/PP composites.


### 2.2. INI Treatments

The flowchart on the treatment details is described in Figure1 [5, 12, 13]. Kenaf bast was retted with a 5% NaOH solution (fiber: NaOH solution = 1 : 30, g/mL) in a hermetical reactor (Parr Instrument Co. 251 M) at 160°C. The retting process took one hour and was aided with a mechanical stirring. The autogenous vapor pressure was 0.60 MPa. After the retting process, the pH of the retting liquid and retted fibers was adjusted to 7.0 using acetic acid. The neutralized fibers were washed with water to remove chemicals from the fibers. These fibers were used as the control fibers. The control fibers and 0.1 mol/L Na2CO3 water solution (fiber: solution = 5 : 400, g/mL) were mixed in the hermetic reactor with mechanical stirring at 70°C with autogenous vapor pressure of 0.1 MPa for 30 minutes. The excessive primary ionic solution was removed from kenaf fibers by gravity. The secondary ionic solution was used to impregnate the fibers at three different temperatures and autogenous vapor pressures (100°C, 0.15 MPa; 130°C, 0.30 MPa, and 160°C, 0.70 MPa) for 15 minutes. The controlled molar ratios of Na2CO3 to CaCl2 were 1 : 1 and 1 : 2 by the concentration of CaCl2 solution, 0.1 mol/L or 0.2 mol/L. Three temperatures and the corresponding pressures provided a total of six INI treatment conditions. After the impregnation of the two ionic solutions, the primary ionic salt (Na2CO3) reacted with the secondary ionic salt (CaCl2) in kenaf bast fibers to generate CaCO3 nanoparticles in the micropore structure of the fiber cell wall, from which the nanoparticle crystals may grow onto the fiber surface. The impregnated fibers were washed to remove excess CaCO3 particles and other ions on fiber surface.Figure 1
Flowchart of INI treatment.


### 2.3. Determination of CaCO3 Loading

The percentage CaCO3 loading in the fibers was calculated based on the difference in ash contents between the untreated fibers and INI-treated fibers. The ash content was determined by burning the material in a muffle furnace first at 400°C for 30 minutes, then at 850°C for 45 minutes.


### 2.4. Characterization of INI-Treated Fibers

Surface morphology, tensile properties of individual fibers, surface hardness, and elastic modulus of the fibers were examined in the same procedures described in the first paper of this series [6]. Elements determination was conducted using a Bruker Quantax 200 X Flash Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectrometer (EDS) System (LN2-free high speed 30 mm2 SDD Detector).


### 2.5. Composites Fabrication

The composites were fabricated with a sheet molding compound process. The control fibers and INI-treated kenaf fibers were dispersed in water by vigorous mechanical stirring. The fiber suspension was poured into a 355 mm × 355 mm deckle box and then passed through a screen (mesh 35), on which the fiber sheets were formed as the water flowed down gravitationally. The fiber sheets were dried in an oven set at 80°C. The fiber sheets and PP films were cut into a dimension of 15.2 cm × 15.2 cm and laminated alternatively. The fiber to PP weight ratio in the composite panel was 50 : 50. The laminated mats were pressed at 200°C and 0.7 MPa for 2.5 minutes. The pressure was not released until the platen was cooled to room temperature. The kenaf fiber/PP panels were removed from the press and stored in a desiccator with the silica gel for two days before preparing the mechanical testing specimens. Three panels were fabricated for each formula. The density of all of the kenaf fiber/PP composites (including the control fibers reinforced and INI-treated fibers-reinforced composites) was 0.88 ± 0.03 g/cm3.


### 2.6. Composites Tensile Properties Testing

Tensile properties of the INI-treated fiber/PP composites and control fiber (untreated fiber)/PP composites were tested with Instron 5869 (load cell 50 kN). The crosshead extensions were used as the specimen deformations. Composites samples were kept in desiccators for one week before tensile testing. The procedures referred to ASTM 1037. The crosshead speed during the tension testing was 2.5 mm/min. Nine replicates of each composite formulation were tested. Multiple comparison of the results was conducted with Fisher's Least Square method atα=0.05 using SAS 9.2 software (SAS Institute Inc. NC, USA). The fracture surfaces of the samples were observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Zeiss Supra TM 40).


## 2.1. Materials

The Kenaf stalks were obtained from MSU North Farm. After the separation of the kenaf core and bast, the bast was cut into 50.8 mm lengths and dried to a moisture content of 7.4% at 103°C. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution (5%, w/v) prepared with NaOH beads (Lab grade, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) and distilled water was used as digestion agent. Glacial acetic acid (17.4 N, Regent grade, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) was used as a pH neutralizer. Sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) aqueous solutions (0.1 mol/L) and calcium chloride (CaCl2) aqueous solutions (0.1 mol/L and 0.2 mol/L) were prepared, respectively, using distilled water. The sodium carbonate and calcium chloride were supplied by Fisher Scientific Inc. Polypropylene (PP) films (CO-EX Oriented Polypropylene), provided by Plastic Suppliers, Inc. Dallas, Tex, USA, and were used to fabricate kenaf fiber/PP composites.


## 2.2. INI Treatments

The flowchart on the treatment details is described in Figure1 [5, 12, 13]. Kenaf bast was retted with a 5% NaOH solution (fiber: NaOH solution = 1 : 30, g/mL) in a hermetical reactor (Parr Instrument Co. 251 M) at 160°C. The retting process took one hour and was aided with a mechanical stirring. The autogenous vapor pressure was 0.60 MPa. After the retting process, the pH of the retting liquid and retted fibers was adjusted to 7.0 using acetic acid. The neutralized fibers were washed with water to remove chemicals from the fibers. These fibers were used as the control fibers. The control fibers and 0.1 mol/L Na2CO3 water solution (fiber: solution = 5 : 400, g/mL) were mixed in the hermetic reactor with mechanical stirring at 70°C with autogenous vapor pressure of 0.1 MPa for 30 minutes. The excessive primary ionic solution was removed from kenaf fibers by gravity. The secondary ionic solution was used to impregnate the fibers at three different temperatures and autogenous vapor pressures (100°C, 0.15 MPa; 130°C, 0.30 MPa, and 160°C, 0.70 MPa) for 15 minutes. The controlled molar ratios of Na2CO3 to CaCl2 were 1 : 1 and 1 : 2 by the concentration of CaCl2 solution, 0.1 mol/L or 0.2 mol/L. Three temperatures and the corresponding pressures provided a total of six INI treatment conditions. After the impregnation of the two ionic solutions, the primary ionic salt (Na2CO3) reacted with the secondary ionic salt (CaCl2) in kenaf bast fibers to generate CaCO3 nanoparticles in the micropore structure of the fiber cell wall, from which the nanoparticle crystals may grow onto the fiber surface. The impregnated fibers were washed to remove excess CaCO3 particles and other ions on fiber surface.Figure 1
Flowchart of INI treatment.


## 2.3. Determination of CaCO3 Loading

The percentage CaCO3 loading in the fibers was calculated based on the difference in ash contents between the untreated fibers and INI-treated fibers. The ash content was determined by burning the material in a muffle furnace first at 400°C for 30 minutes, then at 850°C for 45 minutes.


## 2.4. Characterization of INI-Treated Fibers

Surface morphology, tensile properties of individual fibers, surface hardness, and elastic modulus of the fibers were examined in the same procedures described in the first paper of this series [6]. Elements determination was conducted using a Bruker Quantax 200 X Flash Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectrometer (EDS) System (LN2-free high speed 30 mm2 SDD Detector).


## 2.5. Composites Fabrication

The composites were fabricated with a sheet molding compound process. The control fibers and INI-treated kenaf fibers were dispersed in water by vigorous mechanical stirring. The fiber suspension was poured into a 355 mm × 355 mm deckle box and then passed through a screen (mesh 35), on which the fiber sheets were formed as the water flowed down gravitationally. The fiber sheets were dried in an oven set at 80°C. The fiber sheets and PP films were cut into a dimension of 15.2 cm × 15.2 cm and laminated alternatively. The fiber to PP weight ratio in the composite panel was 50 : 50. The laminated mats were pressed at 200°C and 0.7 MPa for 2.5 minutes. The pressure was not released until the platen was cooled to room temperature. The kenaf fiber/PP panels were removed from the press and stored in a desiccator with the silica gel for two days before preparing the mechanical testing specimens. Three panels were fabricated for each formula. The density of all of the kenaf fiber/PP composites (including the control fibers reinforced and INI-treated fibers-reinforced composites) was 0.88 ± 0.03 g/cm3.


## 2.6. Composites Tensile Properties Testing

Tensile properties of the INI-treated fiber/PP composites and control fiber (untreated fiber)/PP composites were tested with Instron 5869 (load cell 50 kN). The crosshead extensions were used as the specimen deformations. Composites samples were kept in desiccators for one week before tensile testing. The procedures referred to ASTM 1037. The crosshead speed during the tension testing was 2.5 mm/min. Nine replicates of each composite formulation were tested. Multiple comparison of the results was conducted with Fisher's Least Square method atα=0.05 using SAS 9.2 software (SAS Institute Inc. NC, USA). The fracture surfaces of the samples were observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Zeiss Supra TM 40).


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. CaCO3 Loading

Table1 shows the loading percentage of CaCO3 in the fibers. Each specimen was examined twice, and the errors were less than 0.1%. The fibers treated at 130°C (Na2CO3 to CaCl2 = 1 : 1, mol : mol) had the highest CaCO3 loading. Although the differences in the loading percentages of CaCO3 among the impregnation variables were no more than 1%, a small increase in CaCO3 nanoparticle loading could result in a significant change in surface characteristics of the fibers since the particles impregnated in were in nano scales and with a high specific surface area. A small amount of CaCO3 nanoparticles may give a large surface area, which may have a significant impact on the interfacial compatibility between the fiber and the polymer matrix.Table 1
CaCO3 loading percentages of the INI-treated fibers.
INI treatment conditionsTemperature (°C)Na2CO3 : CaCl2 (mol : mol)CaCO3 loading (%)1001 : 11.911001 : 22.301301 : 12.861301 : 22.571601 : 12.431601 : 22.21


### 3.2. Surface Morphology and Element Determination

Figure2 shows the SEM images of the fiber surfaces treated with INI. As the temperature increased, the inorganic nanoparticle size increased, indicating that temperature played an important role in the formation of CaCO3 crystals. The sizes of the CaCO3 nanoparticles in the fibers treated at 100°C and 130°C were smaller than 90 nm. However, some CaCO3 particles generated at 160°C (Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 1, mol : mol) grew to a diameter over nanoscale.SEM images of INI-treated fibers. (a) 100°C (Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 1, mol : mol), (b) 100°C (Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 2, mol : mol), (c) 130°C (Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 1, mol : mol), (d) 130°C (Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 2, mol : mol) at 1 : 2, (e) 160°C (Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 1, mol : mol), and (f) 160°C (Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 2, mol : mol). The white arrows designated the CaCO3 particles.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)The EDS spectrum and elements maps are shown in Figures3 and 4. In the spectrum, calcium (Ca), carbon (C), and oxygen (O) were detected indicating that the CaCO3 nanoparticles exist in the fibers. Calcium may exist as calcium ion (Ca2+) with Cl- ion or in CaCO3 molecule. Since, neither sodium (Na) nor chlorine (Cl) was detected from the EDX. Therefore, Calcium can only exist in CaCO3. This evidence testified that the reaction between Na2CO3 and CaCl2 occurred during the INI process and the CaCO3 was synthesized. The byproduct, NaCl, would have been washed off after the INI treatment. The peaks for gold (Au) and palladium (Pd) came from the specimens coating treatment for the SEM and EDS.Figure 3
EDS spectrum of kenaf fiber treated with INI process at 100°C, Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 2, mol : mol. The white circle designated the point that was analyzed.Figure 4
EDS elements mapping of kenaf fiber treated with INI process at 100°C (Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 2, mol : mol). Left top: calcium (Ca). Right top: oxygen (O). Left bottom: carbon (C). Right bottom: SEM image.


### 3.3. Surface Hardness and Elastic Modulus

Table2 shows the surface hardness and elastic modulus of the INI-treated fibers.Table 2
Surface hardness and elastic modulus of the INI treated fibers.
INI treatment conditionsSurface hardness (MPa)Elastic modulus (GPa)Temperature (°C)Na2CO3 : CaCl2, mol : molMeanStdev.LSDMeanStdev.LSDUntreated fiber287.91113.75A4.641.73A1001 : 1264.8326.36A4.880.43A1001 : 2272.3151.35A5.400.68A1301 : 1423.2547.89B7.080.78B1301 : 2458.19112.81B8.211.03B1601 : 1213.2687.56A4.301.00A1601 : 2295.5742.39A5.280.50AStdev.: means standard deviation. Average of four samples. Means with the different letter are significantly different atα=0.05.The fibers treated at 130°C (0.30 MPa) yielded a 52.6–76.9% increase in modulus and a 47.0–59.1% increase in hardness. The improvement of the hardness and modulus properties was found for the other INI treated fibers also compared with the untreated fiber. The micropores in the cell wall of the lignocellulosic fibers were filled up by the CaCO3 particles, which enhanced the stress transfer between cellulose fibrils resulting a higher hardness and modulus. A higher variation in the hardness and modulus properties was found in Table 2. This may be because that some indentation tests are on the CaCO3, while others on the fibers. In addition, the component variation at different locations of the fiber itself would also cause the variation in hardness and modulus properties.


### 3.4. Tensile Properties of Individual Fibers

The tensile properties of the individual fibers are shown in Table3.Table 3
Tensile properties of individual fibers.
INI treatment conditionsModulus (GPa)LSD TestStrength (MPa)LSD testUntreated fiber13.5A810A100°C, 1 : 214.7A1001B160°C, 1 : 214.6A1032B1 : 2 means the molar ratio of Na2CO3 to CaCl2. Average of 30 samples. Means with the different letter are significantly different at α=0.05.Table3 shows the tensile property comparison for the INI-treated and -untreated fibers. The results showed that the INI treatments improved the tensile properties. While the improvement in tensile modulus did not show statistically different (α=0.05), the tensile strength of the fibers increased significantly after the INI treatments. A 27% increase in tensile strength (from 810 MPa to 1,032 MPa) was obtained for the fiber treated at 160°C (Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 2, mol : mol). The improvement in the tensile strength should be attributed to the impregnation of CaCO3 particles in fiber cell wall, which increases the density of the fibers and reduces the defect for the fiber by filling up the micropores. The CaCO3 particles in the fiber also helped for the stress transfer between the cellulose fibrils, yielding the overall tensile strength improvement.


### 3.5. Tensile Properties of INI Treated Fiber/PP Composites

The tensile strength and tensile modulus of INI treated fiber/PP composites are shown in Table4.Table 4
Tensile strength and tensile modulus of INI treated fiber/PP composites.
Tensile Strength (MPa)Tensile Modulus (GPa)INI treatmentsMeanStdev.LSD TestMeanStdev.LSD TestUntreated46.773.43A1.700.20A100°C, 1 : 149.233.77AB1.880.11B100°C, 1 : 251.652.57B1.960.15BC130°C, 1 : 150.203.30B1.930.22BCD130°C, 1 : 251.612.51B2.050.11DE160°C, 1 : 151.414.33B2.140.22E160°C, 1 : 250.944.31B1.990.16BE1 : 1 and 1 : 2 means the molar ratio of Na2CO3 to CaCl2. Average of 27 samples. Means with the same letter are not significantly different at α=0.05. Stdev: standard deviation of the mean.For most of the treatment conditions, the PP composites reinforced with the INI-treated fibers showed improvement in both tensile strength and tensile modulus. Except for the fibers treated at 100°C (Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 1, mol : mol), significant improvement in tensile strength was found for all other combinations. The INI treatment condition at (100°C, Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 2, mol : mol) showed the best reinforcing effects compared to other conditions, with about 10.4% increase in tensile strength. No significant difference in tensile strength was found among the six INI treatment conditions.The improvement in tensile modulus of the composites does correlate with the INI treatment conditions. INI treatment significantly increased tensile modulus for all combinations. The composites reinforced with the fibers treated at 160°C (Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 1, mol : mol) gave the highest tensile modulus, which was 25.9% higher than those reinforced with untreated fibers.The typical stress-strain curves of the INI-treated fiber/PP composites are shown in Figure5. Since the load taken up by the fibers decreases as the strain increases [14], the tensile behaviors of the composites drive to plastic deformation, and the slopes of the stress-strain curves become smaller as the strain increases. The dislocation of INI-treated kenaf fibers in the composites may occur under a higher load than untreated fibers do because CaCO3 particles modified the compatibility between kenaf fiber and PP matrix. Therefore, the initial slopes of the stress-strain curves are higher for the INI-treated fiber/PP composites than that for the untreated fiber/PP composites, and the elongations of the INI-treated fiber/PP composites were higher than that of the untreated fiber/PP composites.Figure 5
Stress-strain curves of the INI-treated fiber/PP composites. The labels mean the INI treatments conditions for the kenaf fibers. Untreated fiber is the control fiber that has been retted at 160°C but not treated with INI processes.The mechanical property improvement for the kenaf fiber/PP composites should be attributed to the improvement in interfacial bonding between the fiber and PP matrix. Figure6 shows the SEM images for the fracture surfaces of fiber/PP composites with both the INI-treated fibers (two treatment conditions) and -untreated fibers. Fiber pullout is clearly shown at the fracture surface for the composites with untreated fibers (Figure 6(a)) indicating poor interfacial compatibility between untreated fibers and PP. However, for the composites with INI-treated fibers, more simultaneous failure was observed. The interfacial compatibility between the INI-treated fiber and PP matrix was much improved compared to the control samples, indicating stronger adhesion between the fiber and the PP matrix. It may be reasoned that the inorganic nanoparticles deposited on the fiber surface served as the nucleation sites to initiate the crystalline formation of the semicrystalline polymer matrix around the fibers.SEM images of the fracture surfaces of kenaf fiber/PP composites. (a) PP composites reinforced with untreated fibers; (b) PP composites reinforced with INI-treated fibers (INI treatment conditions were 100°C, Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 2, mol : mol), and (c) PP composites reinforced with INI-treated fibers (INI treatment conditions were 160°C, Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 1, mol : mol).
(a)(b)(c)


## 3.1. CaCO3 Loading

Table1 shows the loading percentage of CaCO3 in the fibers. Each specimen was examined twice, and the errors were less than 0.1%. The fibers treated at 130°C (Na2CO3 to CaCl2 = 1 : 1, mol : mol) had the highest CaCO3 loading. Although the differences in the loading percentages of CaCO3 among the impregnation variables were no more than 1%, a small increase in CaCO3 nanoparticle loading could result in a significant change in surface characteristics of the fibers since the particles impregnated in were in nano scales and with a high specific surface area. A small amount of CaCO3 nanoparticles may give a large surface area, which may have a significant impact on the interfacial compatibility between the fiber and the polymer matrix.Table 1
CaCO3 loading percentages of the INI-treated fibers.
INI treatment conditionsTemperature (°C)Na2CO3 : CaCl2 (mol : mol)CaCO3 loading (%)1001 : 11.911001 : 22.301301 : 12.861301 : 22.571601 : 12.431601 : 22.21


## 3.2. Surface Morphology and Element Determination

Figure2 shows the SEM images of the fiber surfaces treated with INI. As the temperature increased, the inorganic nanoparticle size increased, indicating that temperature played an important role in the formation of CaCO3 crystals. The sizes of the CaCO3 nanoparticles in the fibers treated at 100°C and 130°C were smaller than 90 nm. However, some CaCO3 particles generated at 160°C (Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 1, mol : mol) grew to a diameter over nanoscale.SEM images of INI-treated fibers. (a) 100°C (Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 1, mol : mol), (b) 100°C (Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 2, mol : mol), (c) 130°C (Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 1, mol : mol), (d) 130°C (Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 2, mol : mol) at 1 : 2, (e) 160°C (Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 1, mol : mol), and (f) 160°C (Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 2, mol : mol). The white arrows designated the CaCO3 particles.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)The EDS spectrum and elements maps are shown in Figures3 and 4. In the spectrum, calcium (Ca), carbon (C), and oxygen (O) were detected indicating that the CaCO3 nanoparticles exist in the fibers. Calcium may exist as calcium ion (Ca2+) with Cl- ion or in CaCO3 molecule. Since, neither sodium (Na) nor chlorine (Cl) was detected from the EDX. Therefore, Calcium can only exist in CaCO3. This evidence testified that the reaction between Na2CO3 and CaCl2 occurred during the INI process and the CaCO3 was synthesized. The byproduct, NaCl, would have been washed off after the INI treatment. The peaks for gold (Au) and palladium (Pd) came from the specimens coating treatment for the SEM and EDS.Figure 3
EDS spectrum of kenaf fiber treated with INI process at 100°C, Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 2, mol : mol. The white circle designated the point that was analyzed.Figure 4
EDS elements mapping of kenaf fiber treated with INI process at 100°C (Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 2, mol : mol). Left top: calcium (Ca). Right top: oxygen (O). Left bottom: carbon (C). Right bottom: SEM image.


## 3.3. Surface Hardness and Elastic Modulus

Table2 shows the surface hardness and elastic modulus of the INI-treated fibers.Table 2
Surface hardness and elastic modulus of the INI treated fibers.
INI treatment conditionsSurface hardness (MPa)Elastic modulus (GPa)Temperature (°C)Na2CO3 : CaCl2, mol : molMeanStdev.LSDMeanStdev.LSDUntreated fiber287.91113.75A4.641.73A1001 : 1264.8326.36A4.880.43A1001 : 2272.3151.35A5.400.68A1301 : 1423.2547.89B7.080.78B1301 : 2458.19112.81B8.211.03B1601 : 1213.2687.56A4.301.00A1601 : 2295.5742.39A5.280.50AStdev.: means standard deviation. Average of four samples. Means with the different letter are significantly different atα=0.05.The fibers treated at 130°C (0.30 MPa) yielded a 52.6–76.9% increase in modulus and a 47.0–59.1% increase in hardness. The improvement of the hardness and modulus properties was found for the other INI treated fibers also compared with the untreated fiber. The micropores in the cell wall of the lignocellulosic fibers were filled up by the CaCO3 particles, which enhanced the stress transfer between cellulose fibrils resulting a higher hardness and modulus. A higher variation in the hardness and modulus properties was found in Table 2. This may be because that some indentation tests are on the CaCO3, while others on the fibers. In addition, the component variation at different locations of the fiber itself would also cause the variation in hardness and modulus properties.


## 3.4. Tensile Properties of Individual Fibers

The tensile properties of the individual fibers are shown in Table3.Table 3
Tensile properties of individual fibers.
INI treatment conditionsModulus (GPa)LSD TestStrength (MPa)LSD testUntreated fiber13.5A810A100°C, 1 : 214.7A1001B160°C, 1 : 214.6A1032B1 : 2 means the molar ratio of Na2CO3 to CaCl2. Average of 30 samples. Means with the different letter are significantly different at α=0.05.Table3 shows the tensile property comparison for the INI-treated and -untreated fibers. The results showed that the INI treatments improved the tensile properties. While the improvement in tensile modulus did not show statistically different (α=0.05), the tensile strength of the fibers increased significantly after the INI treatments. A 27% increase in tensile strength (from 810 MPa to 1,032 MPa) was obtained for the fiber treated at 160°C (Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 2, mol : mol). The improvement in the tensile strength should be attributed to the impregnation of CaCO3 particles in fiber cell wall, which increases the density of the fibers and reduces the defect for the fiber by filling up the micropores. The CaCO3 particles in the fiber also helped for the stress transfer between the cellulose fibrils, yielding the overall tensile strength improvement.


## 3.5. Tensile Properties of INI Treated Fiber/PP Composites

The tensile strength and tensile modulus of INI treated fiber/PP composites are shown in Table4.Table 4
Tensile strength and tensile modulus of INI treated fiber/PP composites.
Tensile Strength (MPa)Tensile Modulus (GPa)INI treatmentsMeanStdev.LSD TestMeanStdev.LSD TestUntreated46.773.43A1.700.20A100°C, 1 : 149.233.77AB1.880.11B100°C, 1 : 251.652.57B1.960.15BC130°C, 1 : 150.203.30B1.930.22BCD130°C, 1 : 251.612.51B2.050.11DE160°C, 1 : 151.414.33B2.140.22E160°C, 1 : 250.944.31B1.990.16BE1 : 1 and 1 : 2 means the molar ratio of Na2CO3 to CaCl2. Average of 27 samples. Means with the same letter are not significantly different at α=0.05. Stdev: standard deviation of the mean.For most of the treatment conditions, the PP composites reinforced with the INI-treated fibers showed improvement in both tensile strength and tensile modulus. Except for the fibers treated at 100°C (Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 1, mol : mol), significant improvement in tensile strength was found for all other combinations. The INI treatment condition at (100°C, Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 2, mol : mol) showed the best reinforcing effects compared to other conditions, with about 10.4% increase in tensile strength. No significant difference in tensile strength was found among the six INI treatment conditions.The improvement in tensile modulus of the composites does correlate with the INI treatment conditions. INI treatment significantly increased tensile modulus for all combinations. The composites reinforced with the fibers treated at 160°C (Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 1, mol : mol) gave the highest tensile modulus, which was 25.9% higher than those reinforced with untreated fibers.The typical stress-strain curves of the INI-treated fiber/PP composites are shown in Figure5. Since the load taken up by the fibers decreases as the strain increases [14], the tensile behaviors of the composites drive to plastic deformation, and the slopes of the stress-strain curves become smaller as the strain increases. The dislocation of INI-treated kenaf fibers in the composites may occur under a higher load than untreated fibers do because CaCO3 particles modified the compatibility between kenaf fiber and PP matrix. Therefore, the initial slopes of the stress-strain curves are higher for the INI-treated fiber/PP composites than that for the untreated fiber/PP composites, and the elongations of the INI-treated fiber/PP composites were higher than that of the untreated fiber/PP composites.Figure 5
Stress-strain curves of the INI-treated fiber/PP composites. The labels mean the INI treatments conditions for the kenaf fibers. Untreated fiber is the control fiber that has been retted at 160°C but not treated with INI processes.The mechanical property improvement for the kenaf fiber/PP composites should be attributed to the improvement in interfacial bonding between the fiber and PP matrix. Figure6 shows the SEM images for the fracture surfaces of fiber/PP composites with both the INI-treated fibers (two treatment conditions) and -untreated fibers. Fiber pullout is clearly shown at the fracture surface for the composites with untreated fibers (Figure 6(a)) indicating poor interfacial compatibility between untreated fibers and PP. However, for the composites with INI-treated fibers, more simultaneous failure was observed. The interfacial compatibility between the INI-treated fiber and PP matrix was much improved compared to the control samples, indicating stronger adhesion between the fiber and the PP matrix. It may be reasoned that the inorganic nanoparticles deposited on the fiber surface served as the nucleation sites to initiate the crystalline formation of the semicrystalline polymer matrix around the fibers.SEM images of the fracture surfaces of kenaf fiber/PP composites. (a) PP composites reinforced with untreated fibers; (b) PP composites reinforced with INI-treated fibers (INI treatment conditions were 100°C, Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 2, mol : mol), and (c) PP composites reinforced with INI-treated fibers (INI treatment conditions were 160°C, Na2CO3 : CaCl2 = 1 : 1, mol : mol).
(a)(b)(c)


## 4. Conclusions

Inorganic nanoparticles (CaCO3) were successfully impregnated into kenaf bast fibers. From the SEM images, the nanoparticle deposition is clearly observed on the fiber surfaces. INI treatment (at 130°C) increased the surface hardness of the fiber by 52.6–76.9% and the elastic modulus by 47.0–59.1%. The fibers treated at 160°C with INI processes yielded a 27% improvement in tensile strength. The impregnated inorganic nanoparticles improved the compatibility between the fibers and the PP matrix, resulting in an increase in tensile modulus and tensile strength of the kenaf fiber/PP composites. Based on the current lab condition, the INI treatment conditions including (1) 130°C, 1 : 1 (Na2CO3 : CaCl2, mol : mol), (2) 160°C, 1 : 1 (Na2CO3 : CaCl2, mol : mol), and (3) 160°C, 1 : 2 (Na2CO3 : CaCl2, mol : mol) produced the optimal kenaf fibers that had the best reinforcement effects for PP. The PP composites reinforced with the INI-treated (160°C, 1 : 1) fibers showed a 10.4% improvement in tensile strength and 25.9% in tensile modulus compared to those reinforced with untreated fibers.



---

*Source: 736474-2011-09-06.xml*