# Small Antenna Design of Triple Band for WIFI 6E and WLAN Applications in the Narrow Border Laptop Computer

Authors: Wei-Chiang Jhang; Jwo-Shiun Sun
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

This paper presents the design of a small antenna for use in a wireless local area network (WLAN) and Wi-fi 6E on a narrow-border laptop. The dimensions of the antenna are 43 × 3 × 0.4 mm3, and it features a grounding system simulated by a 200 × 260 mm2 copper plate. At low-frequency bands, a couple-fed right arm can excite the fundamental at 2.45 GHz in the λ/4 resonant mode to cover the range of 2.4–2.848 GHz. At higher bands, the couple-fed left arm and direct-fed right arm can control the higher 3λ/4 mode at 5.825 GHz and 5λ/4 mode at 6.85 GHz. The direct-fed left arm excites the fundamental at 5.16 GHz in the λ/4 resonant mode and, with integration of 5.16, 5.825, and 6.85 GHz, can fully cover the range of 5.15–7.125 GHz. In far-field measurements, the peak gain and efficiency in a WLAN with Wi-Fi 6E were 0.82 and 2.58 dBi and 53% and 68% in the low and high bands, respectively. Overall, the experiments revealed that the antenna exhibits a sufficient level of performance for a narrow-border laptop.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

High-speed data rates are the most effective solution with wireless local area network (WLAN) called authorize user wireless mobility. However, with the current technology of wireless systems, high-speed downloads are limited in applications such as the Internet of things and 4K and 8K video. The end users of such products consider the upload and download speeds of WLANs to be unsatisfactory. Therefore, the Wi-fi 6E (the sixth generation of Wi-fi) standard will be introduced in 2021. The bandwidth of Wi-fi 6E is between 5.925 and 7.125 GHz, with 14 × 80 or 7 × 160 MHz channels. Wi-fi functionality is essential for most wireless laptop features. Therefore, laptops should be outfitted with Wi-fi 6E. In the current market, the screen-to-body ratio provides useful information to the consumer. However, the spacing of the border area is limited because less than 4 mm is reserved for antennas. Studies [1–4] have discovered that the guidelines for designing WLAN antennas with coplanar waveguide, slot, and bend-type architectures cannot be implemented because of limited dimensions. In [5], small dimensions and a meandering shape with loop-type antennas were used. Other studies have investigated designs such as PIFA or monopole antennas for Wi-fi applications [6–9]. In [10–12], the authors used chip element to achieve small size and narrow boarder antenna design. However, the used of the inductor makes the hardware complex and also increases the difficulty of the manufacturing process. This study designed an antenna to perform in low-frequency (2.4–2.484 GHz) to high-frequency (5.925–7.125 GHz) bands by using a direct-fed arm and a couple-fed arm to enable full functionality in WLAN and Wi-fi 6E applications.


## 2. Antenna Design

Figures1(a)–1(c) presents the antenna’s FR4 basic construction. Tables 1 and 2 present the dimensions for optimal performance. Figure 2 presents photos from the construction and fabrication of the prototype antenna, in which the substrate’s dielectric constant, loss tangent, and thickness are 4.4, 0.02, and 0.4 mm, respectively. A 33.02-cm-screen laptop was simulated by a 200 × 260 mm2 copper plate. The antenna was designed to be placed on the top of the screen of a notebook computer. Figure 3 presents the components of the antenna. The couple-fed right arm excites the fundamental λ/4 resonant mode at 2.45 GHz, the higher 3λ/4 resonant mode at 5.825 GHz, and the 5λ/4 resonant mode at 6.85 GHz. The 3λ/4 and 5λ/4 resonant modes are controlled by the couple-fed left arm, and it can move to low frequencies. The λ/4 fundamental of 5.16 GHz is excited by the direct-fed left arm, and the couple-fed left arm controls the matching at 5.825 and 6.85 GHz. The integration of the three wide modes at 5.16, 5.825, and 6.85 GHz can create an operating range of 5.15–7.125 GHz (bandwidth of 1.975 GHz or 32.18%). This bandwidth covers the 5G WLAN and Wi-fi 6E application bands. The 2.45 GHz λ/4 fundamental mode is excited by the couple-fed right arm to cover 2.4 G WLANs (2.4–2.484 GHz). To test the performance of the antenna, a woven coaxial cable (characteristic impedance of 50 Ω) with a copper core is soldered onto the direct-fed right arm to supply the radio frequency signal.Figure 1
(a) Geometry of antenna; (b) front view of antenna geometry; (c) bottom view of antenna geometry.
(a)(b)(c)Table 1
Dimensions of front of antenna.
ParameterLL1L2L3L4GWW1W2W3W4Value (mm)43588.41.81231.81.01.451.2Table 2
Dimensions of bottom of antenna.
ParameterL1L2L3L4W1W2W3W4Value (mm)10.52651.5110.52.25Figure 2
Prototype antenna: (a) full front view; (b) partial front view; (c) bottom view.
(a)(b)(c)Figure 3
Components of antenna.


## 3. Experimental Results and Parametric Study

Simulations were conducted using Ansys HFSS software to obtain theS11 values used in this study. As shown in Figure 4, the measurements indicated good performance. The S11 value was −10 dB for covering the WLAN and Wi-fi 6E systems. Figure 5(a) presents the length of the couple-fed right arm and the various simulated S11 values. When the length of the couple-fed right arm was decreased by 1.5 and 3.0 mm, the 2.45 GHz fundamental mode shifted to a higher frequency, and the 2.4 GHz higher 3λ/4 mode at 5.825 GHz and 5λ/4 mode at 6.85 GHz also shifted to higher frequencies, resulting in a mismatch. Figures 5(b)–5(d) display the current distribution of the couple-fed right arm at 2.45, 5.825, and 5.85 GHz. For the resonant mode at 2.45 GHz, one null on the couple-fed right arm was observed, as shown in Figure 5(b). Therefore, the 2.45 GHz mode was in the λ/4 fundamental mode. For the resonant mode at 5.825 GHz, two nulls on the couple-fed right arm were observed, as shown in Figure 5(c). Therefore, the frequency is 5.825 GHz in the 2.45 GHz higher 3λ/4 mode. For the resonant mode with 6.85 GHz, three nulls were observed on the couple-fed right arm, as shown in Figure 5(d). Therefore, the frequency is 6.18 GHz in the 2.45 GHz higher 5λ/4 mode.Figure 4
S11 values derived from simulation and measurement.Figure 5
(a) SimulatedS11 with different lengths of couple-fed right arm of the antenna. Current distribution of couple-fed right arm at (b) 2.45, (c) 5.825, and (d) 6.85 GHz.The simulatedS11 values in Figure 6 indicate the different lengths of the couple-fed left arm. When the arm was shortened by 1 and 2 mm, 5.825 GHz and 6.85 GHz shifted to a higher mode and caused a mismatch. As mentioned previously, the couple-fed right arm’s current distribution at 2.45 GHz resulted in frequencies of 5.825 and 6.85 GHz and a short couple-fed right arm phenomenon. This result confirms that the couple-fed right arm excites the fundamental at 2.45 GHz in the λ/4 resonant mode, 5.825 GHz in the 3λ/4 resonant mode, and 6.85 GHz in the 5λ/4 resonant mode.Figure 6
SimulatedS11 with different lengths of couple-fed left arm of antenna.The data in Figure7(a) indicate the simulated S11 values resulting from reducing the length of the direct-fed left arm. The fundamental mode with this arm was excited at 5.16 GHz. The 5.16 GHz resonant mode shifted to higher frequencies when the length of the arm was reduced by 1.0 and 2.0 mm. Figure 7(b) presents a simulation of the direct-fed left arm and current distribution at 5.16 GHz. One null was observed in the arm. Thus, the 5.16 GHz fundamental mode was λ/4. Observed direct-fed left-side arm had one null. Thus, the 5.15 GHz fundamental mode was 1/4 λ.Figure 7
(a) SimulatedS11 values with different lengths of direct-fed left arm of antenna. (b) 5.16 GHz current distribution of arm.
(a)(b)The simulatedS11 values presented in Figure 8 were derived from the different lengths of the direct-fed right arm. This can influence high band matching. When the length of the arm was reduced by 1 and 2 mm, mismatches occurred at 5.16, 5.825, and 6.85 GHz.Figure 8
SimulatedS11 values with different lengths of direct-fed right arm of antenna.Figure9 presents the simulated and measured of antenna radiation patterns in the x-y, x-z, and y-z planes at 2.45, 5.16, 5.825, and 6.85 GHz. In the x-y plane at 2.45 and 5.16 GHz, the radiation pattern was nearly omnidirectional. Therefore, 2.45 and 5.16 GHz are the fundamental λ/4 modes. Figure 10 presents the measured gain and efficiency of the antenna at 2400–2484 and 5150–7125 MHz. The antenna gain was 1.24–2.14 dBi (0.9-dBi variation), and the efficiency was 62.7%–68.9% (6.2% variation) at 2400–2484 MHz. The gain was above 1.13 dBi, and the efficiency was 53.4%–63.1% (9.7% variation) at 5150–5850 MHz. The gain was above 0.8 dBi, and the efficiency was 55.4%–68.6% (13.2% variation) at 5925–7125 MHz. Table 3 presents the measured gain, efficiency, resonant frequency, and bandwidth. As discussed, the antenna exhibited stable gain, high efficiency, and favorable radiation pattern.Figure 9
Two-dimensional radiation patterns of the antenna in thex-y, x-z, and y-z planes at (a) 2.450, (b) 5.16, (c) 5.825, and (d) 6.85 GHz.
(a)(b)(c)(d)Figure 10
Measured of fain and radiation efficiency of antenna at 2400–2484 and 5150–7125 MHz.Table 3
Resonant frequency, gain, efficiency, and bandwidth of antenna.
Resonance frequency (GHz)Variation peak gain (dBi)Variation efficiency (%)Variation BW (GHz)2.450.9 (1.24–2.14)5.8 (62.7–68.9)0.84 (2.4–2.484)5.16 and 5.8251.03 (1.13–2.15)9.7 (53.4–63.1)0.7 (5.15–5.85)6.851.76 (0.82–2.84)13.1 (55.42–68.6)1.2 (5.925–7.125)To compare the performance of the antenna with that of other antennas, Table4 presents the dimensions, w/wo chip element, support bandwidth, and dimension comparison. In [6–8], the PIFA structure was used to achieve small size antenna design. However, W parameter is larger than proposed antenna not suitable for current narrow-border products. In addition, antenna support bandwidth is less than proposed antenna. In [10–12], the authors used chip element to achieve small size and narrow boarder antenna design. However, the use of inductor makes the hardware complex and also increases the difficulty of the manufacturing process. In [9], the antenna dimensions were larger than proposed antenna and support bandwidth was less than proposal antenna. Our proposed antenna dimension compared with reference is not the smallest, but the parameter of W, support bandwidth, and easily manufacturing process are suitable for current narrow-border products.Table 4
Comparison of proposed antenna with other antennas.
ReferencesDimensionL × W (mm)Chip elementBandwidth (MHz)Dimension comparison (%)[6]21 × 8N2400–2484/3250–3420/5000–5920130[7]5.4 × 9.7N2350–2510/4900–600040[10]30 × 4Y2400–2484/5150–582593[11]20 × 5Y2400–2484/5150–582577[12]12 × 5Y2400–2484/5150–582546[8]20.5 × 5N2400–2484/5150–5825/79[9]46.5 × 9.3N2400–2484/5150–5825/335Present antenna43 × 3N2400–2482/5150–5825/5825–7125


## 4. Conclusions

This study developed a small (43 × 3 mm2) planar antenna for narrow-border notebook computers. The antenna covers the frequency ranges of 2.4–2.484 and 5.15–7.125 GHz by using two fundamental modes and two higher modes. The antenna support range includes those of the WLAN and Wi-fi 6E systems. The antenna is small, supports wide bands, has an omnidirectional radiation pattern at 2.45 and 5.16 GHz, and exhibits stable gain and high efficiency. According to the results, the antenna is suitable for narrow-border laptops.



---

*Source: 7334206-2021-07-09.xml*