# Beam Expansion of Blind Spot Detection Radar Antennas Using a Radome with Defected Corrugated Inner Wall

Authors: Hayeon Kim; Haengseon Lee; Jeonghoon Cho; Cheolbok Kim
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

A beam expanding radome for 76.5 GHz automotive radar antennas is presented whose inner surface is engraved with corrugations. The radar used for blind spot detection (BSD) requires a very wide beam width to ensure longer time for tracking out-of-sight objects. It is found that the corrugations modulate the phase velocities of the waves along the surface, which increases beam width in the far field. In addition, defects in the corrugation increase beam width even further. The presented structure satisfies the beam width requirement while keeping a low profile.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

As safety becomes an important issue in car industries and autonomous vehicle technologies, automotive radars are given much interest. To assist drivers, various automotive radars are being developed such as those for long range, middle range, short range, and blind spot detection. The design requirements for those radars become different following the application of them. While the long-range radars require high gain and narrow beam widths, those for blind spot detection require very wide beam widths. Radar components like antennas and radomes are designed to satisfy those specifications. Among those, radomes have been used to protect antennas from corrosion due to rain, wind, extreme temperature, and so on. At the same time, their influence on the radiation patterns of enclosed antennas should be minimized [1].Commonly used radome types are of stylea and style b [2]. The former has thicknesses of integral multiple of half wavelength, and the latter has thin walls less than 0.1 wavelength. Other styles have multilayer structures to decrease reflections for a wide range of incidence angles and bandwidths.To reduce the reflected waves, similar researches have been carried out on the junction of waveguide sections containing different dielectric materials. For the junction of hollow waveguide and that containing dielectric of refractive indexn, a quarter wavelength transformer containing dielectric with refractive index of n is frequently used to decrease mismatches [3]. Instead of using a different medium, corrugations, arrays of small cylinders, and holes are formed on the surface of dielectric which act as if they were a medium with lower refractive indices [4].Similar approaches have been tried for radomes. For a radome material of refractive indexn, a quarter wavelength thickness dielectric layer is coated whose refractive index is n to decrease mismatches [5]. In [6–8], inhomogeneous radome walls are used which have continuously varying refractive index profile. Instead of attaching a different dielectric layer, corrugations are formed on the surface of radomes [9, 10]. By changing the ratio of dielectric and air portions, effective refractive index can be set to the value n which minimizes reflections.In this paper, a beam-width-expanding radome design is presented. For simple fabrication, a single layer radome with corrugated inner wall is investigated. Relationship between field distributions on the radome surface and far field radiation patterns is found. Parametric studies show that the magnitude and phase variations at the surface of the radome wall determine beam widths of the radiation pattern. It is found that fast phase variation near the enclosed antenna increases the beam width. In addition, slow variation of magnitude near the antenna increases beam width even further. In the following sections, experimental results and full-wave simulations are given which verify the argument.


## 2. Corrugated Radome

In this section, radome design guidelines are given for blind spot detection radars. Unlike the usual definition of half power beam width, the definition for BSD radars means that the angular range of the antenna gain is larger than 3 dBi. The antennas used for this study are linear patch arrays which have sharp fan beam radiation patterns widely used for automotive radars.The wider the beam width, the longer the tracking time for invisible objects in the blind spot region. To increase the angular range, discontinuous refractive index profile along the vertical direction should be smoothed, which can be accomplished by attaching additional matching layers with intermediate refractive indices. To alleviate the burden of the antireflection coating, corrugated surfaces can be formed as shown in Figure1. The effective permittivity of the corrugated surface can be estimated using the following formula [11].
(1)εcor=ε0+εradome−ε0g1g.Figure 1
Corrugated radome.Approximating the corrugated radome by a stack of multiple layers, transmission loss can be calculated using the formula of [12]. Figure 2 shows the transmission loss at 76.5 GHz as a function of g1/g when the thickness of the radome is 1 mm (half wavelength), and g1 ranges from 0.25 mm to 0.75 mm with the value of g=1mm. To increase the angular range, the value of g1/g should be increased. Although the loss becomes smaller when the ratio is small, the angular range becomes larger when the ratio is large.Figure 2
Comparison of transmission loss at 76.5 GHz for differentg1/g ratios.The radome substrate is PBT + 30% glass (polybutylene terephthalate with 30% glass fiber) whose relative permittivity is 3.1 at the frequency of 76.5 GHz. The wavelength at this frequency in air is 3.92 mm and that in the radome medium is 2.23 mm. For this simulation, thickness of the radome is set to be 1 mm. The height of the inner wall from the antenna is set to be 2 mm. The width (g1) and the period (g) of the corrugations are set to 0.5 mm and 1 mm, which corresponds to the effective permittivity of 2.05. Figure 3 shows the full-wave simulated radiation patterns of the radomes with the corrugated inner wall and the simple planar wall as shown in Figure 4. The beam width of the radome with a corrugated inner wall is larger than that of the planar inner wall by 20 degrees. Precise beam widths are listed in Table 1.Figure 3
3 dBi beam width comparison: smooth-walled radome versus corrugated radome.Figure 4
Simulation model for extracting near-field region e-field distribution.
(a)
Corrugated radome
(b)
Smooth-walled radomeTable 1
3 dBi beam widths of the different radome surfaces.
Model
Beam width (degrees)
Smooth-walled radome
114.2
Corrugated radome
137


### 2.1. Relation between Near-Field Pattern and 3 dBi Beam Width

To find the cause of the increased beam width of the corrugated radome, influences of the near-field distributions on the radiation patterns are studied in terms of magnitudes and phases. It is known that the far-field radiation patterns can be obtained by Fourier transforms of the near-field distributions as shown by (2) [13]. It is assumed that the patch array antennas are placed along the y-axis and the periodic corrugations are formed along the x-axis.
(2)Farfield=∫−W/2W/2Exejkxcosθdx,(3)Ex=Ψxejφx,where Ex is the near-field electric field, Ψx is the magnitude, and ϕx is the phase function. The integration is performed over the range from –(W/2) to W/2. The antenna is assumed to be at the origin.Figure5 shows the near-field distributions of the electric fields of the two radomes of Figure 4. The fields are sampled at every 0.05 mm along the x-axis from 0, which is marked in Figure 1, and 0.1 mm above the radome surfaces. Due to the symmetry about the antenna, only the fields along the positive x-axis are recorded. It is found that the phase function of the corrugated radome which has a large beam width has a steep slope. The magnitude of the near-field distribution of the corrugated radome also has a steep slope than that of the smooth one.Figure 5
Normalized e-field intensity distribution for flat and corrugated radomes: (a) amplitude and (b) unwrapped phase.
(a)
Amplitude
(b)
Unwrapped phaseTo investigate the impact of the near-field phase and magnitude on the radiation pattern, parametric equations for those two quantities are devised as follows:(4)Ψx=11+x/An2,(5)ϕx=−px2.The constantA determines the extent beyond which the magnitude begin to decrease. For phase function (5), p is a parameter whose unit is radian per wavelength squared. With large p, phase function decreases more rapidly.Figure6(a) shows the magnitude distributions of the electric field on the radome surface with n fixed and A changed. Figure 6(b) shows the phase distributions with parameter p changed. Figure 7 shows the far-field radiation patterns along the azimuth direction for various sets of amplitude and phase parameters. Figure 7(a) shows the radiation patterns with parameter A changed. The value of n is fixed to be 2, and the phase parameter p is fixed to be 2.0/λ02. Figure 7(b) shows the radiation patterns with parameter p changed from 1.0/λ02 to 2.0/λ02 with fixed amplitude parameters of n=2 and A=1.5λ0. It is found that the near-field distribution with slowly decreasing magnitude and rapidly varying phase has wide beam widths.Figure 6
Approximated normalized electric field intensity distribution.
(a)
Amplitude
(b)
Unwrapped phaseFigure 7
Normalized far-field patterns calculated using approximated amplitude and phase shown in Figure6.
(a)
Far-field pattern whenp=2.0/λ02 and amplitude function Ψx is varied
(b)
Far-field pattern whenn=2, A=1.5λ0, and phase function ϕx is varied


### 2.2. Impact of Shape Parameters of Corrugation on Beam Width

In the preceding section, it is shown that near-field distributions with slowly varying magnitude and rapidly varying phase produce large beam width. To implement the desired near-field distribution by corrugated surfaces, influences of the period (g), width of the ridge (g1), and depth (g2) of the corrugations are observed using full-wave simulations. While g, g1, and g2 are varied, the thickness (d) and height (h) of the radome as shown in Figure 1 are fixed to be 1 mm and 2 mm, respectively.


#### 2.2.1. Impact of Corrugation Period

The period of a corrugation (g) is made up of the ridge (g1) and trough. As the period (g) is varied, near-field distribution changes as shown in Figure 8. With small period, magnitude and phase change rapidly with increasing distance from the radiating antenna, which yields large beam width as shown in Figure 9. Table 2 summarizes the 3 dBi beam width with changing periods.Figure 8
Normalized e-field intensity distribution for the different corrugation periods.
(a)
Amplitude
(b)
Unwrapped phaseFigure 9
3 dBi beam width comparison for the different corrugation periods.Table 2
3 dBi beam widths of the different corrugation periods.
Model
Beam width (degrees)
g
=
0.179
λ
0
144.2
g
=
0.255
λ
0
137
g
=
0.332
λ
0
132.6


#### 2.2.2. Impact of Ridge Width

Ridge widthg1 is varied while g is fixed. As the width grows, as shown in Figure 10, the magnitude and phase distribution of the electric field change steeply. In addition, it contributes to large beam width as shown in Figure 11. The 3 dBi beam widths with varying ridge width are summarized in Table 3.Figure 10
Normalized e-field intensity distribution for the different ridge widths.
(a)
Amplitude
(b)
Unwrapped phaseFigure 11
3 dBi beam width comparison for the different ridge widths.Table 3
3 dBi beam widths of the different ridge widths.
Model
Beam width (degrees)
g
1
=
0.077
λ
0
128
g
1
=
0.128
λ
0
137
g
1
=
0.179
λ
0
144.2


#### 2.2.3. Impact of Corrugation Depth

The impact of corrugation depth (g2) on the near-field distribution is also observed. The ratio of g1/g is fixed to be 0.5. As the depth increases from 0.077 λ0 to 0.179 λ0, magnitude and phase in the near field vary rapidly as shown in Figure 12. Far-field radiation patterns are shown in Figure 13. As g2 approaches λ0/4, however, beam width decreases. When the magnitude varies rapidly, ripples of the far zone radiation pattern increase. The 3 dBi beam widths of each cases are listed in Table 4.Figure 12
Normalized e-field intensity distribution for the different corrugation depths.
(a)
Amplitude
(b)
Unwrapped phaseFigure 13
The 3 dBi beam width comparison for the different corrugation depths.Table 4
3 dBi beam widths of the different corrugation depths.
Model
Beam width (degrees)
g
2
=
0.077
λ
0
124.8
g
2
=
0.128
λ
0
137
g
2
=
0.179
λ
0
149.6


## 2.1. Relation between Near-Field Pattern and 3 dBi Beam Width

To find the cause of the increased beam width of the corrugated radome, influences of the near-field distributions on the radiation patterns are studied in terms of magnitudes and phases. It is known that the far-field radiation patterns can be obtained by Fourier transforms of the near-field distributions as shown by (2) [13]. It is assumed that the patch array antennas are placed along the y-axis and the periodic corrugations are formed along the x-axis.
(2)Farfield=∫−W/2W/2Exejkxcosθdx,(3)Ex=Ψxejφx,where Ex is the near-field electric field, Ψx is the magnitude, and ϕx is the phase function. The integration is performed over the range from –(W/2) to W/2. The antenna is assumed to be at the origin.Figure5 shows the near-field distributions of the electric fields of the two radomes of Figure 4. The fields are sampled at every 0.05 mm along the x-axis from 0, which is marked in Figure 1, and 0.1 mm above the radome surfaces. Due to the symmetry about the antenna, only the fields along the positive x-axis are recorded. It is found that the phase function of the corrugated radome which has a large beam width has a steep slope. The magnitude of the near-field distribution of the corrugated radome also has a steep slope than that of the smooth one.Figure 5
Normalized e-field intensity distribution for flat and corrugated radomes: (a) amplitude and (b) unwrapped phase.
(a)
Amplitude
(b)
Unwrapped phaseTo investigate the impact of the near-field phase and magnitude on the radiation pattern, parametric equations for those two quantities are devised as follows:(4)Ψx=11+x/An2,(5)ϕx=−px2.The constantA determines the extent beyond which the magnitude begin to decrease. For phase function (5), p is a parameter whose unit is radian per wavelength squared. With large p, phase function decreases more rapidly.Figure6(a) shows the magnitude distributions of the electric field on the radome surface with n fixed and A changed. Figure 6(b) shows the phase distributions with parameter p changed. Figure 7 shows the far-field radiation patterns along the azimuth direction for various sets of amplitude and phase parameters. Figure 7(a) shows the radiation patterns with parameter A changed. The value of n is fixed to be 2, and the phase parameter p is fixed to be 2.0/λ02. Figure 7(b) shows the radiation patterns with parameter p changed from 1.0/λ02 to 2.0/λ02 with fixed amplitude parameters of n=2 and A=1.5λ0. It is found that the near-field distribution with slowly decreasing magnitude and rapidly varying phase has wide beam widths.Figure 6
Approximated normalized electric field intensity distribution.
(a)
Amplitude
(b)
Unwrapped phaseFigure 7
Normalized far-field patterns calculated using approximated amplitude and phase shown in Figure6.
(a)
Far-field pattern whenp=2.0/λ02 and amplitude function Ψx is varied
(b)
Far-field pattern whenn=2, A=1.5λ0, and phase function ϕx is varied


## 2.2. Impact of Shape Parameters of Corrugation on Beam Width

In the preceding section, it is shown that near-field distributions with slowly varying magnitude and rapidly varying phase produce large beam width. To implement the desired near-field distribution by corrugated surfaces, influences of the period (g), width of the ridge (g1), and depth (g2) of the corrugations are observed using full-wave simulations. While g, g1, and g2 are varied, the thickness (d) and height (h) of the radome as shown in Figure 1 are fixed to be 1 mm and 2 mm, respectively.


### 2.2.1. Impact of Corrugation Period

The period of a corrugation (g) is made up of the ridge (g1) and trough. As the period (g) is varied, near-field distribution changes as shown in Figure 8. With small period, magnitude and phase change rapidly with increasing distance from the radiating antenna, which yields large beam width as shown in Figure 9. Table 2 summarizes the 3 dBi beam width with changing periods.Figure 8
Normalized e-field intensity distribution for the different corrugation periods.
(a)
Amplitude
(b)
Unwrapped phaseFigure 9
3 dBi beam width comparison for the different corrugation periods.Table 2
3 dBi beam widths of the different corrugation periods.
Model
Beam width (degrees)
g
=
0.179
λ
0
144.2
g
=
0.255
λ
0
137
g
=
0.332
λ
0
132.6


### 2.2.2. Impact of Ridge Width

Ridge widthg1 is varied while g is fixed. As the width grows, as shown in Figure 10, the magnitude and phase distribution of the electric field change steeply. In addition, it contributes to large beam width as shown in Figure 11. The 3 dBi beam widths with varying ridge width are summarized in Table 3.Figure 10
Normalized e-field intensity distribution for the different ridge widths.
(a)
Amplitude
(b)
Unwrapped phaseFigure 11
3 dBi beam width comparison for the different ridge widths.Table 3
3 dBi beam widths of the different ridge widths.
Model
Beam width (degrees)
g
1
=
0.077
λ
0
128
g
1
=
0.128
λ
0
137
g
1
=
0.179
λ
0
144.2


### 2.2.3. Impact of Corrugation Depth

The impact of corrugation depth (g2) on the near-field distribution is also observed. The ratio of g1/g is fixed to be 0.5. As the depth increases from 0.077 λ0 to 0.179 λ0, magnitude and phase in the near field vary rapidly as shown in Figure 12. Far-field radiation patterns are shown in Figure 13. As g2 approaches λ0/4, however, beam width decreases. When the magnitude varies rapidly, ripples of the far zone radiation pattern increase. The 3 dBi beam widths of each cases are listed in Table 4.Figure 12
Normalized e-field intensity distribution for the different corrugation depths.
(a)
Amplitude
(b)
Unwrapped phaseFigure 13
The 3 dBi beam width comparison for the different corrugation depths.Table 4
3 dBi beam widths of the different corrugation depths.
Model
Beam width (degrees)
g
2
=
0.077
λ
0
124.8
g
2
=
0.128
λ
0
137
g
2
=
0.179
λ
0
149.6


## 2.2.1. Impact of Corrugation Period

The period of a corrugation (g) is made up of the ridge (g1) and trough. As the period (g) is varied, near-field distribution changes as shown in Figure 8. With small period, magnitude and phase change rapidly with increasing distance from the radiating antenna, which yields large beam width as shown in Figure 9. Table 2 summarizes the 3 dBi beam width with changing periods.Figure 8
Normalized e-field intensity distribution for the different corrugation periods.
(a)
Amplitude
(b)
Unwrapped phaseFigure 9
3 dBi beam width comparison for the different corrugation periods.Table 2
3 dBi beam widths of the different corrugation periods.
Model
Beam width (degrees)
g
=
0.179
λ
0
144.2
g
=
0.255
λ
0
137
g
=
0.332
λ
0
132.6


## 2.2.2. Impact of Ridge Width

Ridge widthg1 is varied while g is fixed. As the width grows, as shown in Figure 10, the magnitude and phase distribution of the electric field change steeply. In addition, it contributes to large beam width as shown in Figure 11. The 3 dBi beam widths with varying ridge width are summarized in Table 3.Figure 10
Normalized e-field intensity distribution for the different ridge widths.
(a)
Amplitude
(b)
Unwrapped phaseFigure 11
3 dBi beam width comparison for the different ridge widths.Table 3
3 dBi beam widths of the different ridge widths.
Model
Beam width (degrees)
g
1
=
0.077
λ
0
128
g
1
=
0.128
λ
0
137
g
1
=
0.179
λ
0
144.2


## 2.2.3. Impact of Corrugation Depth

The impact of corrugation depth (g2) on the near-field distribution is also observed. The ratio of g1/g is fixed to be 0.5. As the depth increases from 0.077 λ0 to 0.179 λ0, magnitude and phase in the near field vary rapidly as shown in Figure 12. Far-field radiation patterns are shown in Figure 13. As g2 approaches λ0/4, however, beam width decreases. When the magnitude varies rapidly, ripples of the far zone radiation pattern increase. The 3 dBi beam widths of each cases are listed in Table 4.Figure 12
Normalized e-field intensity distribution for the different corrugation depths.
(a)
Amplitude
(b)
Unwrapped phaseFigure 13
The 3 dBi beam width comparison for the different corrugation depths.Table 4
3 dBi beam widths of the different corrugation depths.
Model
Beam width (degrees)
g
2
=
0.077
λ
0
124.8
g
2
=
0.128
λ
0
137
g
2
=
0.179
λ
0
149.6


## 3. Defected Corrugated Surface

In Section2.1, the condition for large beam width is derived such that slowly varying magnitude and rapidly varying phase distribution are needed. However, the condition cannot be achieved by varying the shape parameters of the corrugation only. In this section, introduction of defects in the periodic structure is considered as shown in Figure 14. In the preceding section, magnitude variation of a smooth-walled radome is slower than that of a corrugated wall. After removing a corrugation above the antenna, the behavior of the near-field distribution is observed.Figure 14
Defected corrugated radome (side view).Figure15 shows the near-field distributions with varying width of the defects above the radiating antenna. Those defects are made by removing one to two corrugations above the antenna. Although the phase distribution does not show noticeable change, the magnitude variation becomes slower near the defect.Figure 15
Normalized e-field intensity distribution for defected corrugated radomes.
(a)
Amplitude
(b)
Unwrapped phaseFigures16(a) and 16(b) show the full-wave simulated radiation patterns of the defected corrugated surface. As the window size (defected region) becomes comparable to one wavelength, the azimuth beam width reaches maximum. If increased further, beam width decreased. While the beam widths along the azimuthal direction are affected by the window size, those along the elevation angle remain almost unaltered. Table 5 summarizes the 3 dBi beam widths along the azimuthal and elevation directions of the defected corrugated radomes with different ω.Figure 16
Radiation pattern and input reflection loss comparison for various window widths.
(a)
Azimuth pattern
(b)
Elevation pattern
(c)
Input reflection loss,S11Table 5
3 dBi beam widths of the defected corrugated radomes with differentω.
Model
Azimuth beam width (degrees)
Elevation beam width (degrees)
ω
=
0.128
λ
0 (no defect)
137
20.6
ω
=
0.383
λ
0
148.5
20.1
ω
=
0.638
λ
0
153.6
19.5Figure16(c) shows the input return losses of the antenna with no radome and with radomes with different window widths. When ω is 0.638 λ0, S11 is −9.7 dB. Other than this case, input reflection losses remain below −10 dB.


## 4. Measurement Results

Using the design guidelines in the preceding sections, radomes and automotive radar antennas are built as shown in Figures17 and 18. In Figure 17, three types of radomes having different inner surfaces are shown. They have different thicknesses (d) and heights (h), which are summarized in Table 6 along with measured beam width. The radome with defected corrugation has five defects on the corrugated surface to increase beam widths. The widths of those defects are 2.5 mm. The radar antennas are composed of one transmitting antenna and four receiving antennas. The antennas are numbered as channels one to five from the left. All of those five antennas achieve 3 dBi beam widths of 150 degrees when covered with defected corrugated radome. Measurements were performed for all five channels; however, only the data with the third channel are shown because they are least affected by the edges.Figure 17
Photographs of the fabricated radomes.
(a)
Smooth-walled radome outer surface
(b)
Smooth-walled radome inner surface
(c)
Nondefected corrugated radome outer surface
(d)
Nondefected corrugated radome inner surface
(e)
Defected corrugated radome outer surface
(f)
Defected corrugated radome inner surfaceFigure 18
Photograph of a fabricated five-channel series-fed patch array.Table 6
Radome thickness, height, and measured beam width.
Model
d (mm)
h (mm)
Beam width (degrees)
No radome (antenna only)
—
—
129
Smooth-walled radome
1
4
99
Nondefected corrugated radome
2
4
128
Defected corrugated radome
1
2
152Figure19 shows the measured radiation patterns of different radomes shown in Figure 17. In the preceding simulation results, the 3 dBi gain is used as the criteria when deciding beam width, yet here, 1 dBi gain is used. That is because a microstrip-to-waveguide transition introduces a 2 dB loss. Without a radome, the antenna has 129-degree-wide beam width. With smooth and nondefected corrugated radomes whose h is 4 mm and d values are 1 mm and 2 mm, respectively, beam width gets narrower. However, in the earlier section, nondefected corrugated radome with d=1mm and h=2mm shows wider beam width. Antenna covered with defected corrugated radome shows the widest beam width, and it is 152 degrees. This radiation pattern is dislocated from the axis of the symmetry. The reason is that the locations of the defected region are not uniform above the radiating antenna.Figure 19
Measured radiation patterns of Ch. 3 at 76.5 GHz when radomes having different inner surfaces are used.
(a)
No radome
(b)
Smooth-walled radome
(c)
Nondefected corrugated radome
(d)
Defected corrugated radome


## 5. Conclusion

In this paper, design guidelines on defected corrugated radomes for BSD radars are given which increase beam widths. To achieve large beam widths, slowly varying magnitude and rapidly varying phase are needed. It is shown that by introducing defects on the corrugated surface, those two conditions are met, whereby 35% beam width increase is realized compared with a simple smooth-walled radome.



---

*Source: 7316282-2017-12-10.xml*