# Performance Evaluation of Cyclic Stability and Capacitance of Manganese Oxide Modified Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite for Potential Supercapacitor Applications

Authors: R. Ranjith Kumar; S. Thanigaivel; Nibedita Dey; A. K. Priya; Alagar Karthick; V. Mohanavel; S. Kannadhasan; M. Muhibbullah; Sameh M. Osman
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

Supercapacitors are a revolutionary type of energy storage device. They must be able to charge and discharge quickly while maintaining a high energy density. A storage material’s cyclic stability is a desirable feature. The type of electrode materials employed for the specific study design affects supercapacitor performance. Manganese dioxide has long been regarded as one of the best and most abundant materials in nature, having a potentially high specific capacitance. They also offer a wider potential range, more electroactivity, and are more environmentally friendly. However, because of its decreased volume expansion and low conductivity, it is difficult to use as a capacitor material. As a result, carbon-based porous films and supports can be employed to produce critical composites to overcome the current shortcoming. These nanoparticle-based materials will have improved electrical conductivity and a large surface area. Graphene oxide (GO) has a high surface area, thermal stability, and porosity. As an electrode material, many types of MnO2/carbon-based materials have been widely used in supercapacitors. Their overall performance is influenced by their construction processes, metal ratios, electrolyte medium, and voltage factors. Microwave technology was chosen as a cost-efficient and effective alternative to expensive and laborious techniques for fabricating MnO2/GO composites. The production procedure of a supercapacitor has been explored in this study using MnO2-GO composite materials. Using the electrochemical deposition process, the nanocomposite materials of MnO2-GO are significantly deposited on the stainless steel (SS) substrate material. Galvanostatic charge-discharge techniques and cyclic voltammetry (CV) analytical methods were used to investigate the storage and cycle ability of supercapacitors. The composite MnO2-GO supercapacitor has a higher electrochemical capacitance based on these findings.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

There is a great demand for both energy (conventional and nonconventional) resources due to the increase in living standards. For that reason, the electrochemical energy storages are obtained to be the substitute for this problem [1, 2]. A supercapacitor (SC), formerly electric double layer capacitor (EDLC), is the generic term for the electrochemical capacitor (ECs) family. A conventional solid dielectric is not present in SCs. Two storage principles determine the capacitance value of an EC, which both indivisibly contribute to the total capacitance [1, 3]. In this day and age, consumption of energy in the form of fossil fuels like oil, coal, and natural gas has drastically increased. This adversely affects the world and the environment in ways like global warming, ecological destruction, and endangering life forms. Utilization of renewable energy is the need of the hour as it is ecofriendly. Countries have allotted funds and manpower exclusively to develop ways to use and create energy. Solar, tidal, hydrothermal, geothermal, and wind energy have played their share in alleviating major problems related to energy and environmental conservation all around the world [3, 4]. However, clean energy is very limited and cannot be directly applied to many applications. This is due to the natural conditions and the shortfall of resources; it greatly depends on the types of sources used and causes poor stability as well as tunability with regard to electricity generation. Hence, trustworthy electrochemical systems are encouraged to address efficient conversion, utilization, and storage of above sources [4]. Supercapacitors also known as electrochemical capacitors are the next-generation storage devices. They are popular for their green and clean nature of fabrication and implementation [5]. They also have a greater capacitance potential with higher power output and shelf life when compared to lithium-ion batteries [6]. Along with simple structure, they possess faster charging and pollution free effects while manufacturing. They can be easily applied to portable electronics, hybrid electric locomotives, data backup, etc. [7].Due to their compact structures, high surface area, unique chemical, physical, and mechanical capabilities, nanomaterials have gotten a lot of interest in recent years. The ability to produce and process NMs is the first milestone in nanotechnology for exploring novel physical features and understanding possible uses of NMs. The NMs are also epic in structure and have features that can be adjusted. As a result of this development, NM has been useful in real-world applications [2, 8].Manganese oxide (MnO2) offers the benefit of relatively cost-effective, high theoretical capacitance (~1300 F g-1), and environmentally compatible [9]. MnO2 is used for catalysts, sensors, lithium batteries, and alkaline MnO2/Zn cell applications. The advancements required in generating active materials mainly concern with overall stability, high reversible capacitance, structural flexibility, improved cation diffusion rate under high charge-discharge condition, and environmental friendliness. The composition of MnO2 materially changes the morphology of the surface and leads to an increase in the pseudocapacitive performance of MnO2 as an increase in porosity [2]. The proposed theoretical reasons for MnO2 being a better alternative for electrode materials is its high theoretical capacity in reference to an individual electron-based redox potential reactions of each atom was observed in a wider potential window, electroactive in neutral electrolytes, etc. [10]. These lead to lower corrosion of the collector, and other benefits were incorporated in Figure 1. Improving the performance of electrode materials for the production of high-energy supercapacitors.Figure 1
Performance enhancement of electrode materials for high-energy supercapacitors.The availability of the material is also found to be in excess naturally, which decreases its price value. The crystal structure of the metal also forms crystallinity hence supporting charge storage and dissipation. It has been reported that tunnel or chain structure of alpha, beta, and gamma MnO2 facilitates easier transfer of electrons with higher capacitance. Nanoranged MnO2 has a larger reaction area for feasible and enhanced cation intercalation and deintercalation when compared to its amorphous form [11, 12].In recent years, graphene attained huge interest especially in the fields of electric devices, energy storage applications, and sensors due to their unique property of physiochemical characteristics, such as high surface area, excellent conductivity, and mechanical stability. Structurally, graphene oxide (GO) has been visualized as a graphene sheet with its basal plane and edges filled with oxygen groups. Graphene hybridization with functional NMs enhances the component functional properties and even produces new properties through cooperative interaction.GO has been an appropriate support material for MnO2 loadings in electroactive materials for supercapacitors [13]. GO not only affords high surface area for MnO2 nanosheets deposition but also provides to those nanostructures good adhesion. GO had a significant impression on the property of electrochemical in the GO-MnO2 nanocomposites. Scheme of MnO2 nanocomposites shown in Figure 2 mentioned with the application of supercapacitors made out of MnO2 with optimizing parameters which helps in improving the capacitance, stability, and storage etc.Figure 2
Scheme of MnO2 nanocomposites for the application of supercapacitors.MnO2 nanoparticles can be deposited uniformly on GO with high density. The high loading efficiency of MnO2 and high surface area of MnO2-GO increase the specific capacitance of MnO2-GO [14].This work is aimed at fabricating the composite of MnO2-GO and achieving good conductivity in the charge storage process. The MnO2 and MnO2-GO composites were synthesized by the electrodeposition method. After electrodeposition, the galvanostatic charge-discharge analysis was performed to characterize the charge storage ability of the film from which we can find the ability of the composite as an electrode of a supercapacitor.


## 2. Materials and Method

### 2.1. Fabrication of MnO2-GO Nanocomposite Supercapacitor

MnO2 was synthesized using standard protocol reported previously in 2015 [15]. Graphene oxide was synthesized by modified Hummers method [16]. MnO2 and MnO2-GO NMs were coated on electricity collector substrates by constant potentiostat mode in the electrodeposition method. The SS substrate was cut and polished into 1×1cm size and then washed for 15 min in deionized water by a bath sonicator.The electrochemical deposition was performed for 30 min at 0.8 V using the as prepared SS substrate as the working electrode. Different concentrations of GO (10 mg, 15 mg, and 20 mg) with 25 ml DI water were dispersed by ultrasonication, and then 0.1 M of MnSO4 solution was added to prepare the electrolyte solution. The pH of the electrolyte solution was maintained at 10 by adding 1 M NaOH. Ag/AgCl and Pt electrodes were used as reference and counter electrodes, respectively [17]. The resulting thin films were dried at room temperature after the process of rinsing in DI water. The overall process of synthesis was displayed in the scheme of Figure 3.Figure 3
Schematic of GO sheets and formation of MnO2/GO nanocomposites.


### 2.2. Electrochemical Analysis

#### 2.2.1. Analyzing Setup

For the electrochemical analyses 0.1 M of Na2SO4 dissolved in 50 ml of double-distilled water used as an electrolyte solution, Ag/AgCl was fixed as the reference electrode, whereas prepared MnO2 electrodes made with thin films are considered as working electrodes, and electrodes made out of platinum wire are considered as a counter electrode. These three electrodes were immersed in the electrolyte solution the setup was connected to the BIOLOGIC Science SP-50 model Electrochemical Workstation for the analyses.


#### 2.2.2. Cyclic Voltammetry

The electrochemical characteristics of specified composites are typically measured using cyclic voltammetry, a standard technique. The potential scan starts at a point where there is no electrochemical reaction. The scan proceeds to the switching potential at a predetermined constant rate, then reverses direction and returns to the electrode as oxidation or reduction, accordingly. The formula below was used to compute the active material’s specific capacitance.(1)Specificcapacitance=C=ImνVa−VcFg.I considered as applied current (A), where (Va−Vc) are considered as the potential of sweep window (V), m is known as mass of the active material (g), and v is the scan rate (V s-1).


#### 2.2.3. Galvanostatic Charge–Discharge

The charge-discharge potential and cycle ability of prepared MnO2-GO nanocomposite was measured using galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) technique. It is necessary to conduct the charge and discharge at a constant current until a predetermined voltage is obtained. A cycle is a loop of charging and discharging that repeats over and over again. The time required to reach the set potentials for the applied current was plotted. In the charging process, the constant rate of increment in the potential and the discharge process the constant rate of decrement in the potential with time is the perfect behavior for the charge storage device.Using the charge-discharge curve the capacitance and cycling behavior of the electrode material has been monitored, and also the charge density, energy density, and capacitance of the material were calculated from the following equations.(2)SpecificCapacitanceoftheactivematerialisC=IX∆t/∆VXmFg.


## 2.1. Fabrication of MnO2-GO Nanocomposite Supercapacitor

MnO2 was synthesized using standard protocol reported previously in 2015 [15]. Graphene oxide was synthesized by modified Hummers method [16]. MnO2 and MnO2-GO NMs were coated on electricity collector substrates by constant potentiostat mode in the electrodeposition method. The SS substrate was cut and polished into 1×1cm size and then washed for 15 min in deionized water by a bath sonicator.The electrochemical deposition was performed for 30 min at 0.8 V using the as prepared SS substrate as the working electrode. Different concentrations of GO (10 mg, 15 mg, and 20 mg) with 25 ml DI water were dispersed by ultrasonication, and then 0.1 M of MnSO4 solution was added to prepare the electrolyte solution. The pH of the electrolyte solution was maintained at 10 by adding 1 M NaOH. Ag/AgCl and Pt electrodes were used as reference and counter electrodes, respectively [17]. The resulting thin films were dried at room temperature after the process of rinsing in DI water. The overall process of synthesis was displayed in the scheme of Figure 3.Figure 3
Schematic of GO sheets and formation of MnO2/GO nanocomposites.


## 2.2. Electrochemical Analysis

### 2.2.1. Analyzing Setup

For the electrochemical analyses 0.1 M of Na2SO4 dissolved in 50 ml of double-distilled water used as an electrolyte solution, Ag/AgCl was fixed as the reference electrode, whereas prepared MnO2 electrodes made with thin films are considered as working electrodes, and electrodes made out of platinum wire are considered as a counter electrode. These three electrodes were immersed in the electrolyte solution the setup was connected to the BIOLOGIC Science SP-50 model Electrochemical Workstation for the analyses.


### 2.2.2. Cyclic Voltammetry

The electrochemical characteristics of specified composites are typically measured using cyclic voltammetry, a standard technique. The potential scan starts at a point where there is no electrochemical reaction. The scan proceeds to the switching potential at a predetermined constant rate, then reverses direction and returns to the electrode as oxidation or reduction, accordingly. The formula below was used to compute the active material’s specific capacitance.(1)Specificcapacitance=C=ImνVa−VcFg.I considered as applied current (A), where (Va−Vc) are considered as the potential of sweep window (V), m is known as mass of the active material (g), and v is the scan rate (V s-1).


### 2.2.3. Galvanostatic Charge–Discharge

The charge-discharge potential and cycle ability of prepared MnO2-GO nanocomposite was measured using galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) technique. It is necessary to conduct the charge and discharge at a constant current until a predetermined voltage is obtained. A cycle is a loop of charging and discharging that repeats over and over again. The time required to reach the set potentials for the applied current was plotted. In the charging process, the constant rate of increment in the potential and the discharge process the constant rate of decrement in the potential with time is the perfect behavior for the charge storage device.Using the charge-discharge curve the capacitance and cycling behavior of the electrode material has been monitored, and also the charge density, energy density, and capacitance of the material were calculated from the following equations.(2)SpecificCapacitanceoftheactivematerialisC=IX∆t/∆VXmFg.


## 2.2.1. Analyzing Setup

For the electrochemical analyses 0.1 M of Na2SO4 dissolved in 50 ml of double-distilled water used as an electrolyte solution, Ag/AgCl was fixed as the reference electrode, whereas prepared MnO2 electrodes made with thin films are considered as working electrodes, and electrodes made out of platinum wire are considered as a counter electrode. These three electrodes were immersed in the electrolyte solution the setup was connected to the BIOLOGIC Science SP-50 model Electrochemical Workstation for the analyses.


## 2.2.2. Cyclic Voltammetry

The electrochemical characteristics of specified composites are typically measured using cyclic voltammetry, a standard technique. The potential scan starts at a point where there is no electrochemical reaction. The scan proceeds to the switching potential at a predetermined constant rate, then reverses direction and returns to the electrode as oxidation or reduction, accordingly. The formula below was used to compute the active material’s specific capacitance.(1)Specificcapacitance=C=ImνVa−VcFg.I considered as applied current (A), where (Va−Vc) are considered as the potential of sweep window (V), m is known as mass of the active material (g), and v is the scan rate (V s-1).


## 2.2.3. Galvanostatic Charge–Discharge

The charge-discharge potential and cycle ability of prepared MnO2-GO nanocomposite was measured using galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) technique. It is necessary to conduct the charge and discharge at a constant current until a predetermined voltage is obtained. A cycle is a loop of charging and discharging that repeats over and over again. The time required to reach the set potentials for the applied current was plotted. In the charging process, the constant rate of increment in the potential and the discharge process the constant rate of decrement in the potential with time is the perfect behavior for the charge storage device.Using the charge-discharge curve the capacitance and cycling behavior of the electrode material has been monitored, and also the charge density, energy density, and capacitance of the material were calculated from the following equations.(2)SpecificCapacitanceoftheactivematerialisC=IX∆t/∆VXmFg.


## 3. Results and Discussions

### 3.1. Cyclic Voltammetry Studies

Cyclic voltammetry was performed using prepared MnO2 and MnO2-GO thin films. Here, prepared thin films were fixed as working electrodes whereas the platinum wire was considered as a counter electrode, and Ag/AgCl was a reference electrode, respectively, an aqueous solution of 0.1 M Na2SO4 as the electrolyte for different scan rates.Figure4 shows a cyclic voltammogram of MnO2 and MnO2-GO thin films by applying a scan rate of 5 mV s-1 between the potential of 0 and 0.8 V. It shows the current density vs. potential curve of MnO2: GO (different concentration) composites and pure MnO2. From that, we found that MnO2 has a low current density 10 mg MnO2 added for GO composite which has high current density compared to pure MnO2. Also, 15 mg MnO2-GO composite has a high current density compared to 10 mg composite, and 20 mg MnO2-GO composite has a low current density compared to 15 mg composite because further increment in GO tends to decrease the amount of MnO2 on the surface of the electrode. Ding reported successful electrodeposition of manganese dioxide nanoparticles onto an indium tin oxide glass substrate using the cyclic voltammetry (CV) method, which was used to create an indium tin oxide glass substrate from an aqueous solution of 0.1 M Na2SO4 containing 5×10−3 M MnSO4, and they achieved 294 Fg-1 [9].Figure 4
CV current density of MnO2 and MnO2-GO.


### 3.2. Galvanostatic Charge-Discharge Technique

Galvanostatic charge/discharge experiments were performed to evaluate the specific capacitance and cycle ability of the developed MnO2 and MnO2-GO electrode materials. Further, the insight into the relationship between the specific capacitance of the different MnO2 nanostructures has been studied. The galvanostatic charge-discharge is also performed using the biologic sp-50 electrochemical workstation. Figure 5 depicts the charge-discharge performance of the electrodeposited MnO2 for the first few cycles.Figure 5
Charge and discharge times in MnO2 and MnO2-GO.The potential-time curve was measured from 0 to 0.8 V versus the reference electrode for more than 300 cycles, 0.1 M Na2SO4 was used at a current density of 0.5 mA cm-2. The curves are almost linear and present in the form of typical symmetrical triangle shape which indicates the pseudocapacitance of MnO2. The composition of MnO2-GO has a high charge and discharge time compared to MnO2. Thus, it reported to have increased specific capacitance of MnO2-GO. Sebastin et al. have reported that multilayered film electrodes show good electrochemical properties [6]. Hence, the obtained results indicate that these newly synthesized films could be used as potential applications in electrochemical capacitors.Figure6 clearly shows the variation in specific capacitance with respect to the cycle number of MnO2 and MnO2-GO electrodes. In which MnO2 has the specific capacitance of 80 F/g for the first cycle whereas MnO2-GO has the specific rate of capacitance up to 140 F/g for first cycle. MnO2-GO displays high specific capacitance compared with MnO2. Furthermore, the linear line indicates the cycling performance of MnO2 and MnO2-GO. It shows the films have retained almost 95% of their specific capacitance even after 300 cycles. With these promising results, these materials can be used as an ideal material in supercapacitor applications.Figure 6
Cycling ability of MnO2 and MnO2-GO.Addition of MnO2 to graphene oxide sheets addresses the low volumetric density of graphene-based electrodes. This would prevent the agglomeration of the sheets which happens due to Van der Waals attraction between the nanoparticle and the porous material [18]. Elastic constraint is provided by the carbon skeleton of GO. This avoids the dissolution of the electroactive property of MnO2. A simple microwave-assisted technique can rapidly green synthesize MnO2/GO composites by simple deposition of the nanoparticle onto the sheet [19]. Previous studies stated that doping of MnO2 increases the specific capacitance by three times when compared to pure GO sheet or pure birnessite MnO2 [19, 20].The ratio of the MnO2 by weight plays a crucial role in the capacitance performance. With an increasing mass ratio, the specific capacitance tends to increase which coincides with the results we have obtained for the current study [21]. Composites tend to have higher diffusivity and mobility of charges than disordered MnO2. Changing the crystal structures and orientations of MnO2, it is suggested that GO/MnO2 performance as an active material can be greatly influenced. Eco-friendly techniques under milder conditions are found to be more feasible to control the shape and dimension of the nanoparticle [22]. Controlling oxygen functional moieties and doping of heteroatom on the GO sheets can aid in manufacturing hi-performance electrode materials.Synthesis method has a great influence on the electrochemical performance of MnO2/GO nanocomposites. The specific capacitance of current study is quite low when compared to previously reported nanocomposites. We infer that the microwave technique opted by might not have supported the formation of proper crystal formation in MnO2. As it was already reported that crystal structure positively influences the specific capacitance of a capacitor material. The nanoparticle used in this study does provide high energy density to the porous GO, but the structure of the lattice might not be at its very best. GO ensures upgraded cyclic performance and stability. The microstructure of the sheets with functional groups portrays different properties in various orientations and dimensions for the given nanocomposite. This gives the rational feasibility to optimize this nanocomposite and maximize it to its potential. Nanotubes and nanofibers offer high and rapid diffusion due to its one dimensional orientation.This shortens the ion diffusion pathway which leads to high conductivity and enhanced mechanical properties. Flexibility is also attained by the capacitor material. Similarly, two-dimensional GO is also regarded as an ideal conductive substrate with enhanced specific surface area, conductivity, and ultralow density. Compared to nanotubes, the diffusivity is quite low for GO. Activated form of carbon is mostly opted for fabrication of storage devices owing to its three-dimensional structure and rich functional groups. Although a rich porous support structure is provided in the current study for the nanoparticle the performance yielded was quite less. Orderly channels without obstructions can further maximize the electrochemical performance of MnO2. They accelerate the ion transport and make the diffusivity easier for MnO2.Hence, the current material can be experimented with by incorporating additional channels in the Go sheet to see if the performance could be improved. Even the graphitization of the sheet makes conducive improvement in the transfer of charge between the nanoparticle and the carbon base. Low graphitization of the sheet used in the current study might also be the reason for low performance of the capacitor material. In the previous years of effort has been taken to explore the potential of MnO2/GO composites for their capacitance function. Exciting outcomes have been accomplished so far. There are still many drawbacks in the nanoparticle that hinder its electrochemical property if not set right. A few have already been discussed above [23]. Efforts need to be taken to focus on developing new generation nanoparticle combinations with potential doping to address all drawbacks mentioned above. Table 1 represents the previously reported outcomes on MnO2/GO composites for supercapacitor applications.Table 1
Reported outcomes on MnO2/GO composites for supercapacitor applications.
ElectrolyteCrystal/porous materialSpecific capacitanceReference1 M Na2SO4Gamma MnO2 crystal with graphene270 (0.5 A g-1)[24]1 M KOHMnO2 or graphene342.8 (0.5 A g-1)[25]1 M Na2SO4N doped graphene/MnO2411.5 (0.5 A g-1)[26]Na2SO4 1 MGraphene oxide/MnO2315 (0.5 A g-1)[27]Na2SO4 1 MGraphene oxide/MnO2360.3 (0.5 A g-1)[28]Na2SO4 1 MReduced graphene oxide/MnO2759 (2 A g-1)[29]1 M Na2SO4Graphene/MnO2234.8 (0.1 A g-1)[30]1 M Na2SO4Graphene/MnO2255 (0.5 A g-1)[31]1MNa2SO4Graphene/MnO2133 (0.5 mvs-1)[32]1 M Na2SO4Graphene/CNT/MnO2372 (0.5 A g-1)[33]1 M Na2SO4Sponge reduced graphene oxide/MnO2205 (0.1 A g-1)[20]—Graphene/MnO2310 (2 mvs-1)[34]—MnO2/CNP/graphene255 (2 mvs-1)[35]—Graphene/MnO2/activated carbon fiber felt∗ 1.516[36]—Reduced graphene oxide-MnO2274 (10 mvs-1)[37]—Mn3O4/rGO∗∗ 52.2[38]1 M Na2SO4GO/MnO2140 (0.5 A g-1)Current study


## 3.1. Cyclic Voltammetry Studies

Cyclic voltammetry was performed using prepared MnO2 and MnO2-GO thin films. Here, prepared thin films were fixed as working electrodes whereas the platinum wire was considered as a counter electrode, and Ag/AgCl was a reference electrode, respectively, an aqueous solution of 0.1 M Na2SO4 as the electrolyte for different scan rates.Figure4 shows a cyclic voltammogram of MnO2 and MnO2-GO thin films by applying a scan rate of 5 mV s-1 between the potential of 0 and 0.8 V. It shows the current density vs. potential curve of MnO2: GO (different concentration) composites and pure MnO2. From that, we found that MnO2 has a low current density 10 mg MnO2 added for GO composite which has high current density compared to pure MnO2. Also, 15 mg MnO2-GO composite has a high current density compared to 10 mg composite, and 20 mg MnO2-GO composite has a low current density compared to 15 mg composite because further increment in GO tends to decrease the amount of MnO2 on the surface of the electrode. Ding reported successful electrodeposition of manganese dioxide nanoparticles onto an indium tin oxide glass substrate using the cyclic voltammetry (CV) method, which was used to create an indium tin oxide glass substrate from an aqueous solution of 0.1 M Na2SO4 containing 5×10−3 M MnSO4, and they achieved 294 Fg-1 [9].Figure 4
CV current density of MnO2 and MnO2-GO.


## 3.2. Galvanostatic Charge-Discharge Technique

Galvanostatic charge/discharge experiments were performed to evaluate the specific capacitance and cycle ability of the developed MnO2 and MnO2-GO electrode materials. Further, the insight into the relationship between the specific capacitance of the different MnO2 nanostructures has been studied. The galvanostatic charge-discharge is also performed using the biologic sp-50 electrochemical workstation. Figure 5 depicts the charge-discharge performance of the electrodeposited MnO2 for the first few cycles.Figure 5
Charge and discharge times in MnO2 and MnO2-GO.The potential-time curve was measured from 0 to 0.8 V versus the reference electrode for more than 300 cycles, 0.1 M Na2SO4 was used at a current density of 0.5 mA cm-2. The curves are almost linear and present in the form of typical symmetrical triangle shape which indicates the pseudocapacitance of MnO2. The composition of MnO2-GO has a high charge and discharge time compared to MnO2. Thus, it reported to have increased specific capacitance of MnO2-GO. Sebastin et al. have reported that multilayered film electrodes show good electrochemical properties [6]. Hence, the obtained results indicate that these newly synthesized films could be used as potential applications in electrochemical capacitors.Figure6 clearly shows the variation in specific capacitance with respect to the cycle number of MnO2 and MnO2-GO electrodes. In which MnO2 has the specific capacitance of 80 F/g for the first cycle whereas MnO2-GO has the specific rate of capacitance up to 140 F/g for first cycle. MnO2-GO displays high specific capacitance compared with MnO2. Furthermore, the linear line indicates the cycling performance of MnO2 and MnO2-GO. It shows the films have retained almost 95% of their specific capacitance even after 300 cycles. With these promising results, these materials can be used as an ideal material in supercapacitor applications.Figure 6
Cycling ability of MnO2 and MnO2-GO.Addition of MnO2 to graphene oxide sheets addresses the low volumetric density of graphene-based electrodes. This would prevent the agglomeration of the sheets which happens due to Van der Waals attraction between the nanoparticle and the porous material [18]. Elastic constraint is provided by the carbon skeleton of GO. This avoids the dissolution of the electroactive property of MnO2. A simple microwave-assisted technique can rapidly green synthesize MnO2/GO composites by simple deposition of the nanoparticle onto the sheet [19]. Previous studies stated that doping of MnO2 increases the specific capacitance by three times when compared to pure GO sheet or pure birnessite MnO2 [19, 20].The ratio of the MnO2 by weight plays a crucial role in the capacitance performance. With an increasing mass ratio, the specific capacitance tends to increase which coincides with the results we have obtained for the current study [21]. Composites tend to have higher diffusivity and mobility of charges than disordered MnO2. Changing the crystal structures and orientations of MnO2, it is suggested that GO/MnO2 performance as an active material can be greatly influenced. Eco-friendly techniques under milder conditions are found to be more feasible to control the shape and dimension of the nanoparticle [22]. Controlling oxygen functional moieties and doping of heteroatom on the GO sheets can aid in manufacturing hi-performance electrode materials.Synthesis method has a great influence on the electrochemical performance of MnO2/GO nanocomposites. The specific capacitance of current study is quite low when compared to previously reported nanocomposites. We infer that the microwave technique opted by might not have supported the formation of proper crystal formation in MnO2. As it was already reported that crystal structure positively influences the specific capacitance of a capacitor material. The nanoparticle used in this study does provide high energy density to the porous GO, but the structure of the lattice might not be at its very best. GO ensures upgraded cyclic performance and stability. The microstructure of the sheets with functional groups portrays different properties in various orientations and dimensions for the given nanocomposite. This gives the rational feasibility to optimize this nanocomposite and maximize it to its potential. Nanotubes and nanofibers offer high and rapid diffusion due to its one dimensional orientation.This shortens the ion diffusion pathway which leads to high conductivity and enhanced mechanical properties. Flexibility is also attained by the capacitor material. Similarly, two-dimensional GO is also regarded as an ideal conductive substrate with enhanced specific surface area, conductivity, and ultralow density. Compared to nanotubes, the diffusivity is quite low for GO. Activated form of carbon is mostly opted for fabrication of storage devices owing to its three-dimensional structure and rich functional groups. Although a rich porous support structure is provided in the current study for the nanoparticle the performance yielded was quite less. Orderly channels without obstructions can further maximize the electrochemical performance of MnO2. They accelerate the ion transport and make the diffusivity easier for MnO2.Hence, the current material can be experimented with by incorporating additional channels in the Go sheet to see if the performance could be improved. Even the graphitization of the sheet makes conducive improvement in the transfer of charge between the nanoparticle and the carbon base. Low graphitization of the sheet used in the current study might also be the reason for low performance of the capacitor material. In the previous years of effort has been taken to explore the potential of MnO2/GO composites for their capacitance function. Exciting outcomes have been accomplished so far. There are still many drawbacks in the nanoparticle that hinder its electrochemical property if not set right. A few have already been discussed above [23]. Efforts need to be taken to focus on developing new generation nanoparticle combinations with potential doping to address all drawbacks mentioned above. Table 1 represents the previously reported outcomes on MnO2/GO composites for supercapacitor applications.Table 1
Reported outcomes on MnO2/GO composites for supercapacitor applications.
ElectrolyteCrystal/porous materialSpecific capacitanceReference1 M Na2SO4Gamma MnO2 crystal with graphene270 (0.5 A g-1)[24]1 M KOHMnO2 or graphene342.8 (0.5 A g-1)[25]1 M Na2SO4N doped graphene/MnO2411.5 (0.5 A g-1)[26]Na2SO4 1 MGraphene oxide/MnO2315 (0.5 A g-1)[27]Na2SO4 1 MGraphene oxide/MnO2360.3 (0.5 A g-1)[28]Na2SO4 1 MReduced graphene oxide/MnO2759 (2 A g-1)[29]1 M Na2SO4Graphene/MnO2234.8 (0.1 A g-1)[30]1 M Na2SO4Graphene/MnO2255 (0.5 A g-1)[31]1MNa2SO4Graphene/MnO2133 (0.5 mvs-1)[32]1 M Na2SO4Graphene/CNT/MnO2372 (0.5 A g-1)[33]1 M Na2SO4Sponge reduced graphene oxide/MnO2205 (0.1 A g-1)[20]—Graphene/MnO2310 (2 mvs-1)[34]—MnO2/CNP/graphene255 (2 mvs-1)[35]—Graphene/MnO2/activated carbon fiber felt∗ 1.516[36]—Reduced graphene oxide-MnO2274 (10 mvs-1)[37]—Mn3O4/rGO∗∗ 52.2[38]1 M Na2SO4GO/MnO2140 (0.5 A g-1)Current study


## 4. Limitations and Future Scope

A greater amount of testing and research into MnO2-GO materials is required in order to produce better supercapacitors in the future. Aspects such as poor structural stability and reduced ion diffusion need to be addressed as well [38–44]. Researchers should look into and test high-capacitance materials that can be reversed and modified, when necessary, as well as rapid cation diffusion at high charging and discharging rates.


## 5. Conclusion

An electrochemical deposition approach was used to deposit MnO2 and varied concentrations of MnO2-GO composites on an SS substrate in this investigation. The CV curves depicted the electrochemical performance of pure and composite materials synthesized in various ratios. In comparison to pure, 10 mg, and 20 mg GO added MnO2 thin films, the 15 mg GO-MnO2 electrodeposited film has a high current density. Because it covers the highest area of MnO2 in the composite, increasing the GO tends to lower the film’s performance. The charge storage behavior of the films is demonstrated by galvanostatic charge-discharge analysis, galvanostatic charge-discharge curves have been conducted with different composition of GO to ensure the effective capacitance which shows that MnO2 and MnO2-GO thin films have specific capacitances of 80F/g and 140F/g for the first cycle, respectively, and that the composite retains approximately 95 percent of capacitance after 300 cycles. When compared to previously published nanocomposites, the current study’s specific capacitance is quite low. We deduce that the microwave approach used may not have promoted the creation of appropriate MnO2 crystals. Despite the fact that the nanoparticle was given a rich porous support structure in the current work, the results were disappointing. MnO2 electrochemical performance can be improved even further by having clean, unobstructed channels. Although the nanoparticle utilized in this study provides a high energy density to the porous GO, the lattice structure may not be optimal. Low graphitization of the sheet utilized in this investigation could possibly be a factor in the capacitor’s poor performance.



---

*Source: 7352246-2022-01-22.xml*