# Thermal and Dielectric Behavior Studies of Poly(Arylene Ether Sulfone)s with Sulfonated and Phosphonated Pendants

Authors: Shimoga D. Ganesh; Vasantakumar K. Pai; Mahadevappa Y. Kariduraganavar; Madhu B. Jayanna
Journal: Journal of Materials
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

The present paper discusses the aspects of the synthesizing valeric acid based poly(ether sulfone)s with active carboxylic acid pendants (VALPSU) from solution polymerization technique via nucleophilic displacement polycondensation reaction among 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone (DCDPS) and 4,4′-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl) valeric acid (BHPA). The conditions necessary to synthesize and purify the polymer were investigated in some detail. The synthesized poly(ether sulfone)s comprise sulfone and ether linkages in addition to reactive carboxylic acid functionality; these active carboxylic acid functional groups were exploited to hold the phenyl sulphonic acid and phenyl phosphonic acid pendants. The phenyl sulphonic acid pendants in VALPSU were easily constructed by altering active carboxylic acid moieties by sulfanilic acid using N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) mediated mild synthetic route, whereas the latter one was built in two steps. Initially, polyphosphoric acid condensation with VALPSU by 4-bromoaniline and next straightforward palladium catalyzed synthetic route, in both of which acidic pendants are clenched by polymer backbone via amide linkage. Without impairing the primary polymeric backbone modified polymers were prepared by varying the stoichiometric ratios of respective combinations. All the polymers were physicochemically characterized and pressed into tablets; electrical contacts were established to study the dielectric properties. Finally, the influence of the acidic pendants on the dielectric properties was examined.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Ionomers aim to control the dielectric properties in supramolecular assemblies [1–6]. Many attempts were noticed recently to synthesize ions containing polymers hanging to the macromolecular systems via amide linkages [7, 8], with expected dielectric properties owing to the flexibility of molecular chemistry and the subtleties of supramolecular interactions [9–11]. Several challenges were overcome recently, such as aromatic poly(ether ketone)s with pendant sulfonic acid phenyl groups [12], synthesis of highly sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) random (statistical) copolymers via direct polymerization [13], comb-shaped poly(arylene ether sulfone)s [14], and phosphonic acid containing poly-(arylene ether)s [15]; mild and effective protocols to modify the polymer chains at room temperature opened new prospects as well [16]. The covalent linkages of these different classes of molecules to a single linear polymer chain can produce reactive and functional polymeric systems [17–19] with different physical properties and functions.Aromatic poly(ether sulfone)s have been paid much attention as high performance polymers and they have been widely used [20, 21] by developing new types of bisphenol monomers [22], with sulfonic and phosphonic acid pendants for technological importance [23]. Incorporation of pendant ionic block units [24] to this poly(arylene ether sulfone)s in a macromolecular architecture is an attractive way of creating new supramolecular structures due to its ability to segregate incompatible segment of individual molecules [25, 26]. The resulting ionomers based on related ionic segments may also serve as models providing insight into the ordering of complicated technological systems [27, 28]. Systematic backbone and sequence modification constitutes a powerful approach to learn about the fundamental interactions of ionomers that contribute to the stability of modified polymer structure [29].The present work is devoted to the modification of VALPSU polymer; the derived name represents valeric acid based poly(arylene ether sulfone)s. Herein we report profound structural variations of VALPSU based on the sulfonic and phosphonic acid segments via amide linkages. More recently, we have established the effect of varying the stoichiometric molar ratio of HEPES on the dielectric properties of VALPSU [30]. We are investigating the influence of different molar ratios of the ionic pendants, in addition to introducing other types of phosphonic and sulfonic acid moieties. Mapping out the structural diversity of these ionic organic structural units is of interest in the building of macromolecules, with potential applications in technical field [31].


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Materials

Dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) andN,N′-dimethylformamide (DMF) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. 4-Bromoaniline and sulfanilic acid were purchased from HIMEDIA Chemicals. Polyphosphoric acid (PPA) was procured from Spectrochem Pvt. Ltd. All the other chemicals were of reagent grade and used without further purification. Double distilled water was used throughout the study. DMF was dried over 5 Å molecular sieves for at least 48 h before use. However, VALPSU polymer was not available commercially; the detailed synthetic protocol was described in our previously reported literature [30].


### 2.2. Instrumentation

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed on a PerkinElmer Diamond TGA/DTA thermogravimetric analyzer at a heating rate of 10°C/min in a nitrogen atmosphere. The1H  &  13C NMR spectra were recorded on a BrukerAvance 400 MHz spectrometer using tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard. The dielectric measurements were carried out using impedance analyzer model HIOKI 3352-50 HiTESTER Version 2.3. Samples of powdered polymer were pressed into tablets and sandwiched between two silver-plated stainless steel electrodes. Silver paint (ELTECKS preparation number 1228-C) was coated on both flat surfaces of the pressed tablet and the electrical contacts to the samples were made using the same silver paint to the electrodes. The electrical contacts were checked to verify the ohmic connection. The measurements were carried out at room temperature in the frequency range 50 Hz–5 MHz. The capacitance value (C) and ac conductance (G) were directly obtained from the instrument. The dielectric constant (ɛ′) and ac conductivity (σ
a
c) values are calculated using the relations ɛ
′
=
C
p
d
/
ɛ
o
A and σ
a
c
=
G
d
/
A, respectively, where “d” is the thickness of the polymer tablet, “A” is the cross-sectional area, and ɛ
o is the permittivity of the free space. All these measurements were made under dynamic vacuum.


### 2.3. Method

#### 2.3.1. Synthesis of VALPSU-SUL-60 Polymer (PS-60)

One-step direct modification of VALPSU poly(ether sulfone)s with 60 weight % of sulfanilic acid (PS-60) is discussed. To a 100 mL three-neck flask equipped with a mechanical stirrer and a nitrogen inlet/outlet, 1.0 g of VALPSU and 0.623 g (3.0 mmol) of DCC [the molar calculations are based on the monomer content “4,4-bis(4 hydroxyphenyl)pentanoic acid” for the synthesis of VALPSU polymer] were added and stirred by adding 10 mL dry DMF to form the soluble and more reactive derivative. The solution was stirred at room temperature for 30 min until complete dissolution of the polymer and DCC and then 0.6 g of sulfanilic acid was added along with additional 5 mL of DMF using syringe into the reaction mixture. The thick viscous reaction mixture was stirred at ambient temperature for 22 h; the sulfanilic acid modified polymer was precipitated into an excess of 5% methanolic solution. The precipitated polymer was collected by filtration and pulverized, washed several times with 1 : 1 acetone and water mixture, and finally washed repeatedly with hexane. The resulting white polymer PS-60 was dried under vacuum at 60°C for 24 h.Yield: 85%; FT-IR (diamond window, cm−1) 1732 (C=O, sym.), 1643 (C=O, asym.), 1086 (S=O, asym.), 1009 (S=O, sym.), 1241 (S=O, sulfone). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d
6): δ = 0.98–1.27, 1.46–1.87, 1.97–2.6, 7.03 (br s, 1H), 7.07–7.08 (br s, 1H), 7.20–7.23 (br s, 1H), 7.27–7.28 (br s, 1H), 7.61 (br s, 1H), 7.63 (br s, 1H), 8.07–8.09 (d, 2H).A similar procedure was followed for the synthesis of polymers VALPSU-SUL-20 (PS-20) and VALPSU-SUL-40 (PS-40). The spectral and analytical data are given below.


#### 2.3.2. VALPSU-SUL-40 Polymer (PS-40)

Yield: 85%; FT-IR (diamond window, cm−1) 1734 (C=O, sym.), 1646 (C=O, asym.), 1084 (S=O, asym.), 1012 (S=O, sym.), 1243 (S=O, sulfone). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d
6): δ = 0.99–1.27, 1.47–1.88, 1.96–2.48, 7.03 (br s, 1H), 7.07–7.08 (br s, 1H), 7.20–7.22 (br s, 1H), 7.26–7.28 (br s, 1H), 7.60 (br s, 1H), 7.62 (br s, 1H), 8.07–8.09 (d, 2H).


#### 2.3.3. VALPSU-SUL-20 Polymer (PS-20)

Yield: 80%; FT-IR (diamond window, cm−1) 1733 (C=O, sym.), 1645 (C=O, asym.), 1081 (S=O, asym.), 1014 (S=O, sym.), 1245 (S=O, sulfone). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d
6): δ = 0.99–1.27, 1.47–1.88, 1.96–2.48, 7.03 (br s, 1H), 7.07–7.08 (br s, 1H), 7.20–7.22 (br s, 1H), 7.26–7.28 (br s, 1H), 7.60 (br s, 1H), 7.62 (br s, 1H), 8.07–8.09 (d, 2H).The chemical reaction routes for sulfonic acid and phosphonic acid modified VALPSU are presented in Figures1 and 2, respectively.Figure 1
Synthesis of sulfanilic acid modified VALPSU polymer.Figure 2
Synthesis of phosphonic acid modified VALPSU polymer.


#### 2.3.4. Synthesis of VALPSU-PHOS-20 Polymer (PP-20)

Typical procedure to modify VALPSU polymer with 20 weight % of 4-bromoaniline is discussed. Pulverized mixture of VALPSU (1 g) and 4-bromoaniline (0.2 g) was taken in a 100 mL round bottom flask fitted with a mechanical stirrer and a nitrogen inlet/outlet, 10 g of polyphosphoric acid was added, and the reaction mixture was stirred initially at 120°C for 2 h. The heating was continued to 150°C for another 20 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to 80°C and poured to 5% cold hydrochloric acid solution to precipitate the light brown coloured polymer. The polymer (PP-20) so obtained was repeatedly washed with the hot water and dried under vacuum at 60°C for 24 h.


#### 2.3.5. Synthesis of VALPSU-PHOS-ESTER-20 Polymer (PE-20)

PP-20 (0.6 g, 2 mmol) polymer was dissolved in dry DMSO under nitrogen atmosphere; to this 2.8 mL of triethyl amine is added followed by the addition of 2.6 mL of diethyl phosphite. The solution was stirred for 20 min at 60°C. 0.6 mmol of the catalyst tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium was added in one lot and temperature is raised to 100°C. The precipitated polymer was redissolved by adding additional 5 mL of DMSO after 2 h and allowed to stir for 10 h at the same temperature. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and poured into 75 mL of methanol containing 10 vol % concentrated hydrochloric acid (37%) to obtain a creeping product after 30 min. The polymer that contained the catalyst was washed in hot methanol and hot water for several times. After drying in a vacuum oven, the polymer powder was dissolved in DMSO and reprecipitated in methanol that contained 10 vol % concentrated hydrochloric acid (37%). The polymer was thoroughly washed with hot water and methanol repeatedly to obtain the light grey phosphonated ester polymer (PE-20).


#### 2.3.6. Hydrolysis of VALPSU-PHOS-ESTER-20 Polymer (PE-20)

VALPSU-PHOS-ACID-20 polymer (PA-20) was obtained by the acid hydrolysis of PE-20 by hydrobromic acid (HBr) solution (48%). 0.5 g of suspended PE-20 polymer in 5 mL of HBr (48%) was refluxed for about 70 h. The hydrolysed polymer was washed thoroughly with hot water (80°C) over 30 h to remove excess acid, till the pH of the filtrate water becomes neutral and then off-white fluffy polymer (PA-20) was dried at 60°C for 12 h.


## 2.1. Materials

Dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) andN,N′-dimethylformamide (DMF) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. 4-Bromoaniline and sulfanilic acid were purchased from HIMEDIA Chemicals. Polyphosphoric acid (PPA) was procured from Spectrochem Pvt. Ltd. All the other chemicals were of reagent grade and used without further purification. Double distilled water was used throughout the study. DMF was dried over 5 Å molecular sieves for at least 48 h before use. However, VALPSU polymer was not available commercially; the detailed synthetic protocol was described in our previously reported literature [30].


## 2.2. Instrumentation

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed on a PerkinElmer Diamond TGA/DTA thermogravimetric analyzer at a heating rate of 10°C/min in a nitrogen atmosphere. The1H  &  13C NMR spectra were recorded on a BrukerAvance 400 MHz spectrometer using tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard. The dielectric measurements were carried out using impedance analyzer model HIOKI 3352-50 HiTESTER Version 2.3. Samples of powdered polymer were pressed into tablets and sandwiched between two silver-plated stainless steel electrodes. Silver paint (ELTECKS preparation number 1228-C) was coated on both flat surfaces of the pressed tablet and the electrical contacts to the samples were made using the same silver paint to the electrodes. The electrical contacts were checked to verify the ohmic connection. The measurements were carried out at room temperature in the frequency range 50 Hz–5 MHz. The capacitance value (C) and ac conductance (G) were directly obtained from the instrument. The dielectric constant (ɛ′) and ac conductivity (σ
a
c) values are calculated using the relations ɛ
′
=
C
p
d
/
ɛ
o
A and σ
a
c
=
G
d
/
A, respectively, where “d” is the thickness of the polymer tablet, “A” is the cross-sectional area, and ɛ
o is the permittivity of the free space. All these measurements were made under dynamic vacuum.


## 2.3. Method

### 2.3.1. Synthesis of VALPSU-SUL-60 Polymer (PS-60)

One-step direct modification of VALPSU poly(ether sulfone)s with 60 weight % of sulfanilic acid (PS-60) is discussed. To a 100 mL three-neck flask equipped with a mechanical stirrer and a nitrogen inlet/outlet, 1.0 g of VALPSU and 0.623 g (3.0 mmol) of DCC [the molar calculations are based on the monomer content “4,4-bis(4 hydroxyphenyl)pentanoic acid” for the synthesis of VALPSU polymer] were added and stirred by adding 10 mL dry DMF to form the soluble and more reactive derivative. The solution was stirred at room temperature for 30 min until complete dissolution of the polymer and DCC and then 0.6 g of sulfanilic acid was added along with additional 5 mL of DMF using syringe into the reaction mixture. The thick viscous reaction mixture was stirred at ambient temperature for 22 h; the sulfanilic acid modified polymer was precipitated into an excess of 5% methanolic solution. The precipitated polymer was collected by filtration and pulverized, washed several times with 1 : 1 acetone and water mixture, and finally washed repeatedly with hexane. The resulting white polymer PS-60 was dried under vacuum at 60°C for 24 h.Yield: 85%; FT-IR (diamond window, cm−1) 1732 (C=O, sym.), 1643 (C=O, asym.), 1086 (S=O, asym.), 1009 (S=O, sym.), 1241 (S=O, sulfone). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d
6): δ = 0.98–1.27, 1.46–1.87, 1.97–2.6, 7.03 (br s, 1H), 7.07–7.08 (br s, 1H), 7.20–7.23 (br s, 1H), 7.27–7.28 (br s, 1H), 7.61 (br s, 1H), 7.63 (br s, 1H), 8.07–8.09 (d, 2H).A similar procedure was followed for the synthesis of polymers VALPSU-SUL-20 (PS-20) and VALPSU-SUL-40 (PS-40). The spectral and analytical data are given below.


### 2.3.2. VALPSU-SUL-40 Polymer (PS-40)

Yield: 85%; FT-IR (diamond window, cm−1) 1734 (C=O, sym.), 1646 (C=O, asym.), 1084 (S=O, asym.), 1012 (S=O, sym.), 1243 (S=O, sulfone). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d
6): δ = 0.99–1.27, 1.47–1.88, 1.96–2.48, 7.03 (br s, 1H), 7.07–7.08 (br s, 1H), 7.20–7.22 (br s, 1H), 7.26–7.28 (br s, 1H), 7.60 (br s, 1H), 7.62 (br s, 1H), 8.07–8.09 (d, 2H).


### 2.3.3. VALPSU-SUL-20 Polymer (PS-20)

Yield: 80%; FT-IR (diamond window, cm−1) 1733 (C=O, sym.), 1645 (C=O, asym.), 1081 (S=O, asym.), 1014 (S=O, sym.), 1245 (S=O, sulfone). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d
6): δ = 0.99–1.27, 1.47–1.88, 1.96–2.48, 7.03 (br s, 1H), 7.07–7.08 (br s, 1H), 7.20–7.22 (br s, 1H), 7.26–7.28 (br s, 1H), 7.60 (br s, 1H), 7.62 (br s, 1H), 8.07–8.09 (d, 2H).The chemical reaction routes for sulfonic acid and phosphonic acid modified VALPSU are presented in Figures1 and 2, respectively.Figure 1
Synthesis of sulfanilic acid modified VALPSU polymer.Figure 2
Synthesis of phosphonic acid modified VALPSU polymer.


### 2.3.4. Synthesis of VALPSU-PHOS-20 Polymer (PP-20)

Typical procedure to modify VALPSU polymer with 20 weight % of 4-bromoaniline is discussed. Pulverized mixture of VALPSU (1 g) and 4-bromoaniline (0.2 g) was taken in a 100 mL round bottom flask fitted with a mechanical stirrer and a nitrogen inlet/outlet, 10 g of polyphosphoric acid was added, and the reaction mixture was stirred initially at 120°C for 2 h. The heating was continued to 150°C for another 20 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to 80°C and poured to 5% cold hydrochloric acid solution to precipitate the light brown coloured polymer. The polymer (PP-20) so obtained was repeatedly washed with the hot water and dried under vacuum at 60°C for 24 h.


### 2.3.5. Synthesis of VALPSU-PHOS-ESTER-20 Polymer (PE-20)

PP-20 (0.6 g, 2 mmol) polymer was dissolved in dry DMSO under nitrogen atmosphere; to this 2.8 mL of triethyl amine is added followed by the addition of 2.6 mL of diethyl phosphite. The solution was stirred for 20 min at 60°C. 0.6 mmol of the catalyst tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium was added in one lot and temperature is raised to 100°C. The precipitated polymer was redissolved by adding additional 5 mL of DMSO after 2 h and allowed to stir for 10 h at the same temperature. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and poured into 75 mL of methanol containing 10 vol % concentrated hydrochloric acid (37%) to obtain a creeping product after 30 min. The polymer that contained the catalyst was washed in hot methanol and hot water for several times. After drying in a vacuum oven, the polymer powder was dissolved in DMSO and reprecipitated in methanol that contained 10 vol % concentrated hydrochloric acid (37%). The polymer was thoroughly washed with hot water and methanol repeatedly to obtain the light grey phosphonated ester polymer (PE-20).


### 2.3.6. Hydrolysis of VALPSU-PHOS-ESTER-20 Polymer (PE-20)

VALPSU-PHOS-ACID-20 polymer (PA-20) was obtained by the acid hydrolysis of PE-20 by hydrobromic acid (HBr) solution (48%). 0.5 g of suspended PE-20 polymer in 5 mL of HBr (48%) was refluxed for about 70 h. The hydrolysed polymer was washed thoroughly with hot water (80°C) over 30 h to remove excess acid, till the pH of the filtrate water becomes neutral and then off-white fluffy polymer (PA-20) was dried at 60°C for 12 h.


## 2.3.1. Synthesis of VALPSU-SUL-60 Polymer (PS-60)

One-step direct modification of VALPSU poly(ether sulfone)s with 60 weight % of sulfanilic acid (PS-60) is discussed. To a 100 mL three-neck flask equipped with a mechanical stirrer and a nitrogen inlet/outlet, 1.0 g of VALPSU and 0.623 g (3.0 mmol) of DCC [the molar calculations are based on the monomer content “4,4-bis(4 hydroxyphenyl)pentanoic acid” for the synthesis of VALPSU polymer] were added and stirred by adding 10 mL dry DMF to form the soluble and more reactive derivative. The solution was stirred at room temperature for 30 min until complete dissolution of the polymer and DCC and then 0.6 g of sulfanilic acid was added along with additional 5 mL of DMF using syringe into the reaction mixture. The thick viscous reaction mixture was stirred at ambient temperature for 22 h; the sulfanilic acid modified polymer was precipitated into an excess of 5% methanolic solution. The precipitated polymer was collected by filtration and pulverized, washed several times with 1 : 1 acetone and water mixture, and finally washed repeatedly with hexane. The resulting white polymer PS-60 was dried under vacuum at 60°C for 24 h.Yield: 85%; FT-IR (diamond window, cm−1) 1732 (C=O, sym.), 1643 (C=O, asym.), 1086 (S=O, asym.), 1009 (S=O, sym.), 1241 (S=O, sulfone). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d
6): δ = 0.98–1.27, 1.46–1.87, 1.97–2.6, 7.03 (br s, 1H), 7.07–7.08 (br s, 1H), 7.20–7.23 (br s, 1H), 7.27–7.28 (br s, 1H), 7.61 (br s, 1H), 7.63 (br s, 1H), 8.07–8.09 (d, 2H).A similar procedure was followed for the synthesis of polymers VALPSU-SUL-20 (PS-20) and VALPSU-SUL-40 (PS-40). The spectral and analytical data are given below.


## 2.3.2. VALPSU-SUL-40 Polymer (PS-40)

Yield: 85%; FT-IR (diamond window, cm−1) 1734 (C=O, sym.), 1646 (C=O, asym.), 1084 (S=O, asym.), 1012 (S=O, sym.), 1243 (S=O, sulfone). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d
6): δ = 0.99–1.27, 1.47–1.88, 1.96–2.48, 7.03 (br s, 1H), 7.07–7.08 (br s, 1H), 7.20–7.22 (br s, 1H), 7.26–7.28 (br s, 1H), 7.60 (br s, 1H), 7.62 (br s, 1H), 8.07–8.09 (d, 2H).


## 2.3.3. VALPSU-SUL-20 Polymer (PS-20)

Yield: 80%; FT-IR (diamond window, cm−1) 1733 (C=O, sym.), 1645 (C=O, asym.), 1081 (S=O, asym.), 1014 (S=O, sym.), 1245 (S=O, sulfone). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d
6): δ = 0.99–1.27, 1.47–1.88, 1.96–2.48, 7.03 (br s, 1H), 7.07–7.08 (br s, 1H), 7.20–7.22 (br s, 1H), 7.26–7.28 (br s, 1H), 7.60 (br s, 1H), 7.62 (br s, 1H), 8.07–8.09 (d, 2H).The chemical reaction routes for sulfonic acid and phosphonic acid modified VALPSU are presented in Figures1 and 2, respectively.Figure 1
Synthesis of sulfanilic acid modified VALPSU polymer.Figure 2
Synthesis of phosphonic acid modified VALPSU polymer.


## 2.3.4. Synthesis of VALPSU-PHOS-20 Polymer (PP-20)

Typical procedure to modify VALPSU polymer with 20 weight % of 4-bromoaniline is discussed. Pulverized mixture of VALPSU (1 g) and 4-bromoaniline (0.2 g) was taken in a 100 mL round bottom flask fitted with a mechanical stirrer and a nitrogen inlet/outlet, 10 g of polyphosphoric acid was added, and the reaction mixture was stirred initially at 120°C for 2 h. The heating was continued to 150°C for another 20 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to 80°C and poured to 5% cold hydrochloric acid solution to precipitate the light brown coloured polymer. The polymer (PP-20) so obtained was repeatedly washed with the hot water and dried under vacuum at 60°C for 24 h.


## 2.3.5. Synthesis of VALPSU-PHOS-ESTER-20 Polymer (PE-20)

PP-20 (0.6 g, 2 mmol) polymer was dissolved in dry DMSO under nitrogen atmosphere; to this 2.8 mL of triethyl amine is added followed by the addition of 2.6 mL of diethyl phosphite. The solution was stirred for 20 min at 60°C. 0.6 mmol of the catalyst tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium was added in one lot and temperature is raised to 100°C. The precipitated polymer was redissolved by adding additional 5 mL of DMSO after 2 h and allowed to stir for 10 h at the same temperature. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and poured into 75 mL of methanol containing 10 vol % concentrated hydrochloric acid (37%) to obtain a creeping product after 30 min. The polymer that contained the catalyst was washed in hot methanol and hot water for several times. After drying in a vacuum oven, the polymer powder was dissolved in DMSO and reprecipitated in methanol that contained 10 vol % concentrated hydrochloric acid (37%). The polymer was thoroughly washed with hot water and methanol repeatedly to obtain the light grey phosphonated ester polymer (PE-20).


## 2.3.6. Hydrolysis of VALPSU-PHOS-ESTER-20 Polymer (PE-20)

VALPSU-PHOS-ACID-20 polymer (PA-20) was obtained by the acid hydrolysis of PE-20 by hydrobromic acid (HBr) solution (48%). 0.5 g of suspended PE-20 polymer in 5 mL of HBr (48%) was refluxed for about 70 h. The hydrolysed polymer was washed thoroughly with hot water (80°C) over 30 h to remove excess acid, till the pH of the filtrate water becomes neutral and then off-white fluffy polymer (PA-20) was dried at 60°C for 12 h.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Synthesis and Characterization

The sulfanilic acid modification reaction to the VALPSU polymer was achieved through simple and efficient room temperature DCC catalyzed condensation route. The chemical structures of all the sulfanilic acid modified VALPSU polymers were characterized and confirmed with FTIR and NMR spectroscopic techniques.Pendant phenyl sulfonic acid units are constructed via simple DCC coupling conditions at ambient temperature by simple one-step process to afford amide linked ionic pendants to VALPSU. Whereas phosphonic acid pendants to VALPSU are built in three-step synthetic procedure, initially VALPSU was made to react with 4-bromoaniline by polyphosphoric acid condensation protocol to get 4-bromophenyl units as a part of VALPSU. In the latter process, these 4-bromophenyl pendants are transformed successfully to phosphonic ester derivatives, which are later converted to phosphonic acid moiety by simple acid hydrolysis. Palladium catalyzed synthetic route was adopted to convert 4-bromophenyl moieties to respective phosphonic ester derivatives; the polymers which are completely soluble in DMSO were effectively converted. But the PP-60 polymer was insoluble in DMSO. So, respective PE-60 and PA-60 were not obtained.The1H and 13C NMR spectrums of VALPSU-SUL-40 polymer (PS-40) were shown in Figure S1 and Figure S2 in Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7271959. The characteristic chemical shifts of ethylene groups appeared at around 1.22 to 2.49 ppm and aromatic peaks at around 7.03 to 8.09 ppm. In 13C NMR spectra of PS-40 (Figure S2), characteristic chemical shifts of aliphatic and aromatic carbon signals appeared in respective regions as expected. A lower chemical shift in the carbon signals is observed for PS-40 polymer as compared to VALPSU; this diamagnetic shift is induced from very weak base, amide bonds; this relative lack of basicity is explained by the electron-withdrawing nature of the carbonyl group where the lone pair of electrons on the nitrogen is delocalized by resonance. The 1H NMR spectra of PP-40 polymer (Figure S3) showed a signal which clearly indicates the conversion of part of carboxylic acid units into hanging 4-bromophenyl pendants to VALPSU via amide linkage. From the NMR spectrum of PA-40 (Figure S4), it is clear that phosphonic ester in PE-40 is hydrolysed to respective phosphonic acid.


### 3.2. Thermal Analysis

From the TGA plot shown in Figure3, it is observed that initial weight loss in case of phenyl sulfonic acid modified polymers was attributed to the desulfonation of sulfonic groups, where -SO3H was easily exterminated by releasing H2O, SO2, and other sulfur oxides, which is not observed in starting VALPSU and which is observed for modified polymers below 200°C. Another major weight loss is witnessed for the decomposition of pendant sulfonic units attached via amide linkages and remaining carboxylic acid groups from main VALPSU polymer backbone at around 250–350°C.Figure 3
TGA thermograms of VALPSU and sulfanilic acid modified VALPSU polymers at a heating rate of 10°C/min under nitrogen atmosphere.Second major degradation step is observed in the range of 510–650°C and it accounted for the decomposition of main polymeric chain. No weight loss is observed before 110°C because the polymers were totally dried before analysis. Kinetic and thermodynamic parameters were calculated using Broido’s method [32]. Broido has developed a model and the activation energy associated with each stage of decomposition was also evaluated by this method.Plots of-
ln
⁡
(
ln
⁡
(
-
1
/
y
)
) versus 1
/
T (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)) were developed for the decomposition segments of sulfanilic acid modified VALPSU polymers. From the plots, the activation energy (E
a) and frequency factor (ln
⁡
A) were evaluated. The enthalpy (Δ
H), entropy (Δ
S), and free energy (Δ
G) have been calculated using standard equations and are summarized in Table 1.Table 1
Kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of modified sulfonated VALPSU.
Samples
Decomposition range (°C)
E
a (kJ/mol) × 10−3
ln
⁡
A
Δ
H (kJ/mol)
Δ
S (kJ/K)
Δ
G (kJ/mol)
PS-20
140–350
0.217
−12.06
−4.321
−164.11
85.31
510–645
1.659
−9.853
−7.058
−160.91
136.64
PS-40
160–370
0.355
−11.562
−4.459
−163.91
87.92
160–370
0.883
−10.567
−7.068
−160.00
136.89
PS-60
170–315
1.031
−10.443
−4.276
−163.88
90.56
530–640
2.467
−9.366
−7.124
−159.96
137.12Figure 4
(a) Plots of-
ln
⁡
(
ln
⁡
(
-
1
/
y
)
) versus 1
/
T
×
10
-
3 for the first decomposition of sulfanilic acid modified VALPSU polymer. (b) Plots of -
ln
⁡
(
ln
⁡
(
-
1
/
y
)
) versus 1
/
T
×
10
-
3 for the second decomposition of sulfanilic acid modified VALPSU polymer.
(a)
(b)Thermogravimetric analysis was carried out for all the PP-20, PP-40, PP-60, PE-20, PA-20, PE-40, and PA-60 polymers; the patterns are presented in Figures5, 6(a), and 6(b). Polymers bearing pendant units obviously showed moderate thermal stability compared to VALPSU. PA-20 and PA-40 are predominantly more stable than their respective ester derivatives, PE-20 and PE-40, respectively. But these are adequately less stable to their respective bromoderivatives, that is, PP-20 and PP-40 polymers.Figure 5
TGA thermograms of 4-bromoaniline modified VALPSU polymers at a heating rate of 10°C/min under nitrogen atmosphere.Figure 6
(a) TGA thermograms of phosphonated derivatives of VALPSU polymers (20 weight %) at a heating rate of 10°C/min under nitrogen atmosphere. (b) TGA thermograms of phosphonated derivatives of VALPSU polymers (40 weight %) at a heating rate of 10°C/min under nitrogen atmosphere.
(a)
(b)PE-60 and PA-60 were not attained because the 60 weight % 4-bromoaniline modified polymer (PP-60) was not soluble in DMSO to proceed for further steps.Figures7 and 8 illustrate that the plots of -
ln
⁡
(
ln
⁡
(
-
1
/
y
)
) versus 1
/
T were developed for the decomposition segment 4-bromoaniline and its respective phosphonated derivatives of VALPSU polymers. From the plots, the activation energy (E
a) and frequency factor (ln
⁡
A) were evaluated. The enthalpy (Δ
H), entropy (Δ
S), and free energy (Δ
G) have been calculated using standard equations and are summarized in Table 2. The result indicates that the activation energies for PE-20 and PE-40 compared to PA-20 and PA-40 are lower, signposting that the decomposition step is faster. Decomposition of PP-20 was faster in comparison to PP-60, as PP-20 including the much carboxylic acid moieties in addition to the 4-bromophenyl pendants suffers faster decomposition than PP-60.Table 2
Kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of modified phosphonated VALPSU.
Samples
Decomposition range (°C)
E
a (kJ/mol) × 10−3
ln
⁡
A
Δ
H (kJ/mol)
Δ
S (kJ/K)
Δ
G (kJ/mol)
PP-20
330–625
2.41
−9.444
−6.241
−161.89
121.57
PP-40
330–625
3.88
−8.824
−6.239
−161.64
121.38
PP-60
335–630
4.72
−8.549
−6.261
−161.59
121.78
PE-20
400–645
0.84
−10.633
−6.620
−161.72
128.78
PA-20
395–645
2.73
−9.272
−6.577
−161.53
127.85
PE-40
365–645
0.73
−10.789
−6.477
−161.85
126.11
PA-40
365–640
1.49
−9.999
−6.453
−161.74
125.56Figure 7
(a) Plots of-
ln
⁡
(
ln
⁡
(
-
1
/
y
)
) versus 1
/
T
×
10
-
3 for the phosphonated derivatives of modified VALPSU polymer (20 weight %). (b) Plots of -
ln
⁡
(
ln
⁡
(
-
1
/
y
)
) versus 1
/
T
×
10
-
3 for the phosphonated derivatives of modified VALPSU polymer (40 weight %).
(a)
(b)Figure 8
Plots of-
ln
⁡
(
ln
⁡
(
-
1
/
y
)
) versus 1
/
T
×
10
-
3 for the 4-bromoaniline modified VALPSU polymer.


### 3.3. Frequency Dependence ac Conductivity (σ
ac), Dielectric Constant (ε
′), and Dielectric Loss (t
a
n
δ)

From Figure9, it is observed that the variation of conductivity as a function of frequency at ambient temperature does not vary much with frequency and is almost negligible; since VALPSU is an insulating material, at lower frequencies the ac conductivity depends on the nature of dielectric nature of the material. Above 5 MHz, σ
a
c varies and increases steeply and linearly follows classical hopping model [33].Figure 9
Room temperature variation of ac conductivity withlog
⁡
(
f
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
) for VALPSU and modified VALPSU.
(a)
(b)The plot of variation of dielectric constant as a function oflog
⁡
(
f
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
) at room temperature is shown in Figure 10. The plot illustrates that it is generally followed by almost all the dielectric and ferroelectric materials. The dielectric constant drops at high frequencies; this is due to the fact that the dipoles can no longer follow the high frequencies; the dielectric constant of 177 is achieved for the 60 weight % of sulfanilic acid to VALPSU. Minimum dielectric constant (ε
′) value of 155 was obtained for PA-40. The higher ionic moieties in the VALPSU upshot the lower dielectric constant [34, 35] and it may also be due to affecting factor of increasing amide functional groups in the polymeric chain.Figure 10
Room temperature variation of dielectric constant (ε
′) with log
⁡
(
f
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
) of modified VALPSU polymer.
(a)
(b)Frequency dependence variations of dielectric loss at room temperature were presented in Supplementary Material (Figure S5). As per the plottan
⁡
δ decreases with increase of frequency and attains the constant value. The dielectric loss of all the sulfanilic acid modified polymers is lower than 0.18; at 2 MHz tan
⁡
δ was well below 0.07 but the respective phosphonic derivatives display 0.02 with increasing frequency which is due to low ion drifting and restriction in dipole polarisation due to polar groups in the polymeric chain.


## 3.1. Synthesis and Characterization

The sulfanilic acid modification reaction to the VALPSU polymer was achieved through simple and efficient room temperature DCC catalyzed condensation route. The chemical structures of all the sulfanilic acid modified VALPSU polymers were characterized and confirmed with FTIR and NMR spectroscopic techniques.Pendant phenyl sulfonic acid units are constructed via simple DCC coupling conditions at ambient temperature by simple one-step process to afford amide linked ionic pendants to VALPSU. Whereas phosphonic acid pendants to VALPSU are built in three-step synthetic procedure, initially VALPSU was made to react with 4-bromoaniline by polyphosphoric acid condensation protocol to get 4-bromophenyl units as a part of VALPSU. In the latter process, these 4-bromophenyl pendants are transformed successfully to phosphonic ester derivatives, which are later converted to phosphonic acid moiety by simple acid hydrolysis. Palladium catalyzed synthetic route was adopted to convert 4-bromophenyl moieties to respective phosphonic ester derivatives; the polymers which are completely soluble in DMSO were effectively converted. But the PP-60 polymer was insoluble in DMSO. So, respective PE-60 and PA-60 were not obtained.The1H and 13C NMR spectrums of VALPSU-SUL-40 polymer (PS-40) were shown in Figure S1 and Figure S2 in Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7271959. The characteristic chemical shifts of ethylene groups appeared at around 1.22 to 2.49 ppm and aromatic peaks at around 7.03 to 8.09 ppm. In 13C NMR spectra of PS-40 (Figure S2), characteristic chemical shifts of aliphatic and aromatic carbon signals appeared in respective regions as expected. A lower chemical shift in the carbon signals is observed for PS-40 polymer as compared to VALPSU; this diamagnetic shift is induced from very weak base, amide bonds; this relative lack of basicity is explained by the electron-withdrawing nature of the carbonyl group where the lone pair of electrons on the nitrogen is delocalized by resonance. The 1H NMR spectra of PP-40 polymer (Figure S3) showed a signal which clearly indicates the conversion of part of carboxylic acid units into hanging 4-bromophenyl pendants to VALPSU via amide linkage. From the NMR spectrum of PA-40 (Figure S4), it is clear that phosphonic ester in PE-40 is hydrolysed to respective phosphonic acid.


## 3.2. Thermal Analysis

From the TGA plot shown in Figure3, it is observed that initial weight loss in case of phenyl sulfonic acid modified polymers was attributed to the desulfonation of sulfonic groups, where -SO3H was easily exterminated by releasing H2O, SO2, and other sulfur oxides, which is not observed in starting VALPSU and which is observed for modified polymers below 200°C. Another major weight loss is witnessed for the decomposition of pendant sulfonic units attached via amide linkages and remaining carboxylic acid groups from main VALPSU polymer backbone at around 250–350°C.Figure 3
TGA thermograms of VALPSU and sulfanilic acid modified VALPSU polymers at a heating rate of 10°C/min under nitrogen atmosphere.Second major degradation step is observed in the range of 510–650°C and it accounted for the decomposition of main polymeric chain. No weight loss is observed before 110°C because the polymers were totally dried before analysis. Kinetic and thermodynamic parameters were calculated using Broido’s method [32]. Broido has developed a model and the activation energy associated with each stage of decomposition was also evaluated by this method.Plots of-
ln
⁡
(
ln
⁡
(
-
1
/
y
)
) versus 1
/
T (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)) were developed for the decomposition segments of sulfanilic acid modified VALPSU polymers. From the plots, the activation energy (E
a) and frequency factor (ln
⁡
A) were evaluated. The enthalpy (Δ
H), entropy (Δ
S), and free energy (Δ
G) have been calculated using standard equations and are summarized in Table 1.Table 1
Kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of modified sulfonated VALPSU.
Samples
Decomposition range (°C)
E
a (kJ/mol) × 10−3
ln
⁡
A
Δ
H (kJ/mol)
Δ
S (kJ/K)
Δ
G (kJ/mol)
PS-20
140–350
0.217
−12.06
−4.321
−164.11
85.31
510–645
1.659
−9.853
−7.058
−160.91
136.64
PS-40
160–370
0.355
−11.562
−4.459
−163.91
87.92
160–370
0.883
−10.567
−7.068
−160.00
136.89
PS-60
170–315
1.031
−10.443
−4.276
−163.88
90.56
530–640
2.467
−9.366
−7.124
−159.96
137.12Figure 4
(a) Plots of-
ln
⁡
(
ln
⁡
(
-
1
/
y
)
) versus 1
/
T
×
10
-
3 for the first decomposition of sulfanilic acid modified VALPSU polymer. (b) Plots of -
ln
⁡
(
ln
⁡
(
-
1
/
y
)
) versus 1
/
T
×
10
-
3 for the second decomposition of sulfanilic acid modified VALPSU polymer.
(a)
(b)Thermogravimetric analysis was carried out for all the PP-20, PP-40, PP-60, PE-20, PA-20, PE-40, and PA-60 polymers; the patterns are presented in Figures5, 6(a), and 6(b). Polymers bearing pendant units obviously showed moderate thermal stability compared to VALPSU. PA-20 and PA-40 are predominantly more stable than their respective ester derivatives, PE-20 and PE-40, respectively. But these are adequately less stable to their respective bromoderivatives, that is, PP-20 and PP-40 polymers.Figure 5
TGA thermograms of 4-bromoaniline modified VALPSU polymers at a heating rate of 10°C/min under nitrogen atmosphere.Figure 6
(a) TGA thermograms of phosphonated derivatives of VALPSU polymers (20 weight %) at a heating rate of 10°C/min under nitrogen atmosphere. (b) TGA thermograms of phosphonated derivatives of VALPSU polymers (40 weight %) at a heating rate of 10°C/min under nitrogen atmosphere.
(a)
(b)PE-60 and PA-60 were not attained because the 60 weight % 4-bromoaniline modified polymer (PP-60) was not soluble in DMSO to proceed for further steps.Figures7 and 8 illustrate that the plots of -
ln
⁡
(
ln
⁡
(
-
1
/
y
)
) versus 1
/
T were developed for the decomposition segment 4-bromoaniline and its respective phosphonated derivatives of VALPSU polymers. From the plots, the activation energy (E
a) and frequency factor (ln
⁡
A) were evaluated. The enthalpy (Δ
H), entropy (Δ
S), and free energy (Δ
G) have been calculated using standard equations and are summarized in Table 2. The result indicates that the activation energies for PE-20 and PE-40 compared to PA-20 and PA-40 are lower, signposting that the decomposition step is faster. Decomposition of PP-20 was faster in comparison to PP-60, as PP-20 including the much carboxylic acid moieties in addition to the 4-bromophenyl pendants suffers faster decomposition than PP-60.Table 2
Kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of modified phosphonated VALPSU.
Samples
Decomposition range (°C)
E
a (kJ/mol) × 10−3
ln
⁡
A
Δ
H (kJ/mol)
Δ
S (kJ/K)
Δ
G (kJ/mol)
PP-20
330–625
2.41
−9.444
−6.241
−161.89
121.57
PP-40
330–625
3.88
−8.824
−6.239
−161.64
121.38
PP-60
335–630
4.72
−8.549
−6.261
−161.59
121.78
PE-20
400–645
0.84
−10.633
−6.620
−161.72
128.78
PA-20
395–645
2.73
−9.272
−6.577
−161.53
127.85
PE-40
365–645
0.73
−10.789
−6.477
−161.85
126.11
PA-40
365–640
1.49
−9.999
−6.453
−161.74
125.56Figure 7
(a) Plots of-
ln
⁡
(
ln
⁡
(
-
1
/
y
)
) versus 1
/
T
×
10
-
3 for the phosphonated derivatives of modified VALPSU polymer (20 weight %). (b) Plots of -
ln
⁡
(
ln
⁡
(
-
1
/
y
)
) versus 1
/
T
×
10
-
3 for the phosphonated derivatives of modified VALPSU polymer (40 weight %).
(a)
(b)Figure 8
Plots of-
ln
⁡
(
ln
⁡
(
-
1
/
y
)
) versus 1
/
T
×
10
-
3 for the 4-bromoaniline modified VALPSU polymer.


## 3.3. Frequency Dependence ac Conductivity (σ
ac), Dielectric Constant (ε
′), and Dielectric Loss (t
a
n
δ)

From Figure9, it is observed that the variation of conductivity as a function of frequency at ambient temperature does not vary much with frequency and is almost negligible; since VALPSU is an insulating material, at lower frequencies the ac conductivity depends on the nature of dielectric nature of the material. Above 5 MHz, σ
a
c varies and increases steeply and linearly follows classical hopping model [33].Figure 9
Room temperature variation of ac conductivity withlog
⁡
(
f
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
) for VALPSU and modified VALPSU.
(a)
(b)The plot of variation of dielectric constant as a function oflog
⁡
(
f
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
) at room temperature is shown in Figure 10. The plot illustrates that it is generally followed by almost all the dielectric and ferroelectric materials. The dielectric constant drops at high frequencies; this is due to the fact that the dipoles can no longer follow the high frequencies; the dielectric constant of 177 is achieved for the 60 weight % of sulfanilic acid to VALPSU. Minimum dielectric constant (ε
′) value of 155 was obtained for PA-40. The higher ionic moieties in the VALPSU upshot the lower dielectric constant [34, 35] and it may also be due to affecting factor of increasing amide functional groups in the polymeric chain.Figure 10
Room temperature variation of dielectric constant (ε
′) with log
⁡
(
f
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
) of modified VALPSU polymer.
(a)
(b)Frequency dependence variations of dielectric loss at room temperature were presented in Supplementary Material (Figure S5). As per the plottan
⁡
δ decreases with increase of frequency and attains the constant value. The dielectric loss of all the sulfanilic acid modified polymers is lower than 0.18; at 2 MHz tan
⁡
δ was well below 0.07 but the respective phosphonic derivatives display 0.02 with increasing frequency which is due to low ion drifting and restriction in dipole polarisation due to polar groups in the polymeric chain.


## 4. Conclusion

Dielectric ionomers with pendant phenyl sulfonic acid and phenyl phosphonic acid moieties were synthesized and well characterized. The analytical and spectral data were well consistent with the proposed structures of modified VALPSU. All the modified polymers exhibit good thermal stability which was confirmed by TGA. The VALPSU having phenyl phosphonic acid units shows better thermal stability than the phenyl sulfonic acid moieties. Adopting Broido method to the decomposition steps of phosphonic ester and phosphonic acid derivatives clearly indicates that VALPSU having phosphonic acid units undergoes decomposition much slower compared to the phosphonic ester derivatives. As the content of phenyl sulfonic acid and phenyl phosphonic acid units increased in the VALPSU, we observed the decrease in the dielectric constant and it reaches 155 from 488 for the 40 weight % of phosphonic acid derivative of VALPSU. All the modified polymers suffer low dielectric loss below 0.3. These low dielectric constant and low loss materials with adequate thermal stability are prime candidates in microelectronics and can replace selectively the ceramic and glass materials to make them applicable in high operating frequencies devices.



---

*Source: 7271959-2016-08-24.xml*