# Rate Decline Behavior of Selectively Completed Horizontal Wells in Naturally Fractured Oil Reservoirs

Authors: Qi-guo Liu; You-jie Xu; Long-xin Li; An-zhao Ji
Journal: Mathematical Problems in Engineering
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

Selectively completed horizontal wells (SCHWs) can significantly reduce cost of completing wells and delay water breakthrough and prevent wellbore collapse in weak formations. Thus, SCHWs have been widely used in petroleum development industry. SCHWs can shorten the effective length of horizontal wells and thus have a vital effect on production. It is significant for SCHWs to study their rate decline and flux distribution in naturally fractured reservoirs. In this paper, by employing motion equation, state equation, and mass conservation equation, three-dimension seepage differential equation is established and corresponding analytical solution is obtained by Laplace transform and finite cosine Fourier transform. According to the relationship of constant production and wellbore pressure in Laplace domain, dimensionless rate solution is gotten under constant wellbore pressure in Laplace domain. Dimensionless pressure and pressure derivate curves and rate decline curves are drawn in log-log plot and seven flow regimes are identified by Stehfest numerical inversion. We compared the simplified results of this paper with the results calculated by Saphir for horizontal wells in naturally fractured reservoirs. The results showed excellent agreement. Some parameters, such as outer boundary radius, storativity ratio, cross-flow coefficient, number and length of open segments, can obviously affect the rate integral and rate integral derivative log-log curves of the SCHWs. The proposed model in this paper can help better understand the flow regime characteristics of the SCHWs and provide more accurate rate decline analysis of the SCHWs data to evaluate formation.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In the early age, since horizontal wells can increase productivity, they became a popular method to develop oil and gas. Compared with vertical wells, horizontal wells can control severe water or gas coning problems, increase the connecting area with the reservoir, and reduce wellbore turbulence [1].Although horizontal wells show a number of advantages, increasing wellbore length may lead to production imbalance along the wellbore, which can lead to water coning and decreased production. Certainly, the uneven rate distribution can lead to bottom-water break through [2]. However, horizontal open holes may be completed by employing prepacked screens because of their low cost. At the same time, prepacked screens can effectively minimize sand production. With the production of oil or gas, the sand will accumulate around the horizontal wellbore, which makes fluids of formation flow into wellbore by a section of wellbores opened and causes productivity decline. In order to reduce cost of completing horizontal well, delay water breakthrough, and prevent wellbore collapse in weak formations, SCHWs were used widely and actual production also proves the effectiveness of the method. An important feature of SCHWs was that only some segments of the wellbore are open to the formation. It is also observed that even if the entire length of the horizontal well is open or perforated, only some segments produce fluid [3].To analyze the wellbore pressure and rate response of SCHWs, some engineers tend to use an effective horizontal well length to replace the open length of the horizontal well. This treatment assumes that the open length of the horizontal well is continuous instead of interval distribution. An analytical model was developed in real domain to predict the inflow performance of SCHWs and selectively completed vertical wells (SCVWs) [4, 5]. Their model considers the distribution of the open intervals. Kamal et al. [6] presented an analytical model of SCHWs by employing instantaneous-point-source solution and the superposition principle. They used this model to analyze actual cases where pressure transient is available. Yildiz [7–9] and Seyide [10] presented a model of SCHWs and SCVWs and derived asymptotic approximations of the model in Laplace space. Pressure and pressure-derivate log-log curves were plotted, flow characteristics were discussed, and each segment rate of SCHWs was analyzed. A new semianalytical model for predicting the performance of horizontal wells which were completed by inflow control devices in bottom-water reservoirs was presented. The coupled solution is developed for predicting the performance of horizontal wells in a box-shaped reservoir with bottom-water drive [11].In order to analyze the rate decline curve of SCHWs, a mathematical model considering difference between horizontal and vertical permeability of SCHWs is established in naturally fractured reservoirs. Based on point source and the superposition principle, pressure analytical solution of the SCHWs under the condition of constant production in impermeable top and bottom boundary and lateral impermeable boundary by Laplace transform and finite cosine Fourier transform. Log-log curves of pressure and pressure-derivate and rate decline are drawn in naturally fractured reservoirs by employing Stehfest numerical inversion. Seven flow regimes, according to the characteristic of pressure-derivate curve, are identified and every flow regime characteristic is described in detail. This paper discusses that relevant parameters (storativity ratio, flow coefficient, number and length completed horizontal sections, etc.) have effect on pressure and rate decline curves. Corresponding solutions can be useful in completion design and rate decline in field practice.


## 2. Physical Model of SCHWs and Assumption

Horizontal wells are located in naturally fractured reservoirs with impermeable top and bottom boundary and lateral impermeable boundary and parallel to the upper and lower impermeable boundary. Horizontal well consists ofNNc open segments and Nc completed segments (shown in Figure 1). The naturally fractured reservoir is structured by matrix system and natural fracture system. The dual-porosity media are assumed as the Warren-Root model and pseudo-steady cross flow exits between the matrix and fractures. Fluids flow into natural fractures from matrix firstly and flow into horizontal wellbore from natural fractures secondly by open segments (shown in Figure 2). In order to make mathematical model more reliable and accurate, some assumptions are listed as follows:(a)
The fluid flow in the reservoir obeys Darcy’s law and law of isothermal percolation.(b)
Flow is single phase and the fluid has constant and small compressibility and constant viscosity.(c)
Formation permeability is anisotropic with three major directional permeabilitykx, ky, kz.(d)
Formation initial pressure ispe and horizontal produced at a constant surface flow rate qsc.(e)
Horizontal well consists ofNNc open segments and Nc completed segments, and fluids flow into wellbore by only open segments.(f)
The length of the open segments and completed segments may be unequal, and each open segment may have a different skin effect and production rate.Figure 1
Schematic of the SCHWs in naturally fractured oil reservoirs.Figure 2
Schematic of fluid flowing path for SCHW in naturally fractured oil reservoirs.In this paper, we follow the point source theory adopted by Gringarten and Ramey [12] and Ozkan and Raghavan [13, 14] in order to obtain wellbore pressure under constant-rate production and rate distribution under constant-pressure production in naturally fractured reservoirs (see Notations section).


## 3. Mathematical Model of SCHWs

### 3.1. Point Source Model

#### 3.1.1. Governing Equation

(A) Fracture System. The 3D governing equation describing transient fluid flow in natural fracture system can be written as follows:(1)∂2pf∂r2+1r∂pf∂r+kfvkfh∂2pf∂z2=ϕfCftμkfh∂pf∂t+ϕmCmtμkfh∂pm∂twherer=(x-xw)2+(y-yw)2(B) Matrix System. The 3D governing equation describing transient fluid flow in natural fracture system can be written as follows:(2)αkmkfhpm-pf+ϕmCmμkfh∂pm∂t=0


#### 3.1.2. Initial Conditions

The initial pressure is assumed to be equal and is represented by original formation pressure in naturally fractured oil reservoirs; thus(3)pfr,z,t=0=pe(4)pmr,z,t=0=pe


#### 3.1.3. Inner and Outer Boundary Conditions

It is assumed that production rate of point source isq~(t); thus inner boundary condition can be written as(5)limε→0⁡∫zw-ε/2zw+ε/2limδ→0⁡2πkfhμr∂pf∂rr=εdz=q~tCorresponding outer boundary conditions can be expressed as for a laterally impermeable boundary, top, and bottom boundaries being(6)
∂
p
f
r
,
z
=
0
,
t
∂
z
=
0
(7)
∂
p
f
r
,
z
=
h
,
t
∂
z
=
0
(8)
∂
p
f
r
=
R
e
,
z
,
t
∂
r
=
0


### 3.2. Dimensionless Point Source Model in Laplace Domain

According to dimensionless variables definition in Table1, (1)–(8) can be transformed into (9)
∂
2
p
f
D
∂
r
D
2
+
1
r
D
∂
p
f
D
∂
r
D
+
∂
2
p
f
D
∂
z
D
2
=
ω
∂
p
f
D
∂
t
D
+
1
-
ω
∂
p
m
D
∂
t
D
λ
p
m
D
-
p
f
D
+
1
-
ω
∂
p
m
D
∂
t
D
=
0
p
f
D
r
D
,
z
D
,
t
D
=
0
=
0
p
m
D
r
D
,
z
D
,
t
D
=
0
=
0
∂
p
f
D
r
D
,
z
D
=
0
,
t
D
∂
z
D
=
0
∂
p
f
D
r
D
,
z
D
=
h
D
,
t
D
∂
z
D
=
0
∂
p
f
D
r
D
=
R
e
D
,
z
D
,
t
D
∂
r
D
=
0
lim
ε
D
→
0
⁡
∫
z
w
D
-
ε
D
/
2
z
w
D
+
ε
D
/
2
lim
δ
D
→
0
⁡
r
D
∂
p
f
D
∂
r
D
r
D
=
ε
D
d
z
D
=
-
h
D
q
~
D
t
DTable 1
Dimensionless variables definition.
Variables Dimensionless definition Dimensionless pressure of fracture system p f D = 2 π k f h h q s c μ p e - p f  Dimensionless pressure of matrix system p m D = 2 π k f h h q s c μ p e - p m  Dimensionless wellbore pressure p w D = 2 π k f h h q s c μ p e - p w  Dimensionless production time t D = k f h t μ ϕ C t f + m L r e f 2  Dimensionless distance r D = r L r e f  Dimensionless reservoir thickness h D = h L r e f  Dimensionless radius of impermeable circle boundary R e D = R e L r e f  Dimensionless coordinate x D = x L r e f y D = y L r e f z D = z L r e f k f h k f v  Dimensionless x-y-z coordinate of point source x w D = x w L r e f y w D = y w L r e f z w D = z w L r e f k f h k f v  Dimensionless length of open segment L N c D = L N c L r e f  Dimensionless wellbore radius r w D = r w L r e f  Dimensionless mid-point ofith open segment x m D = x m L r e f  Dimensionless continuous production q ~ D = q ~ q s c  Dimensionless infinitesimal vertical distance ε D = ε L r e f  Dimensionless infinitesimal radial distance δ D = δ L r e fFor convenience in derivation, by adopting Laplace transform with respect totD and solving pressure of matrix, respectively, through (9), thus (9) can be expressed as follows in Laplace domain.(10)∂2p-fD∂rD2+1rD∂p-fD∂rD+∂2p-fD∂zD2=up-fD∂p-fDrD,zD=0,s∂zD=0∂p-fDrD,zD=hD,s∂zD=0∂p-fDrD=ReD,zD,s∂rD=0limεD→0⁡∫zwD-εD/2zwD+εD/2limδD→0rD∂p-fD∂rDrD=εDdzD=-hDq~-Dswhereu=λ+sω(1-ω)/λ+s(1-ω)sBy finite cosine transform with respect tozD, (10) can be written as(11)d2p-⌢fDdrD2+1rDdp-⌢fDdrD=u+n2π2hD2p-⌢fDdp-⌢fDrD=ReD,n,s∂rD=0limδD→0⁡rDdp-⌢fDdrDrD=εD=-q~-DshDcos⁡nπzwDhDIn deriving(10), we have used the following finite cosine transform and inverse finite cosine transform.(12)p-⌢fDrD,n,s=∫0hDp-fDrD,zD,scos⁡nπzDhDdzD(13)p-fDrD,zD,s=1hDp-⌢fDrD,0,s+2hD∑n=1∞p-⌢fDrD,n,scos⁡nπzDhD


### 3.3. Model Solution of Point Source

Equation(10) is zero-order Bessel equation and inner and outer boundary conditions; general solution of zero-order Bessel equation can be written as(14)p-⌢fD=AK0εnrD+BI0εnrDwhereεn=u+n2π2/hD2 (n=0,1,2,3…).According to the properties of modified Bessel’s functions and outer boundary condition, the coefficient B can be expressed by(15)B=K1εnReDI1εnReDAHence, (14) also can be written as(16)p-⌢fD=AK0εnrD+K1εnReDI1εnReDI0εnrDCombining with inner boundary condition, the coefficient A in (16) can be determined as follows.(17)A=q~-DhDcos⁡nπzwDhDSubstituting (17) into (16) and employing finite cosine inverse transform, finally, (16) can be written as follows:(18)p-fD=q~-DK0ε0rD+K1ε0ReDI1ε0ReDI0ε0rD+2∑n=1∞K0εnrD+K1εnReDI1εnReDI0εnrDcos⁡nπzDhDcos⁡nπzwDhDEquation (18) is the point source solution in naturally fractured oil reservoirs.


### 3.4. Model Solution of Line Source for SCHWs

Taking the SCHWs shown in Figure1, for example, although rate of the horizontal well in different location, open segments can be seen as a uniform rate horizontal line source for SCHWs. Thus we take the ith open segment as our research object, taking mid-point of ith open segment as origin coordinate. So we can get line source of ith open segment by integrating with respect to xD from xmDi-LNcDi/2 to xmDi-LNcDi/2 for point source in (18). Finally(19)p-fDi=q-DiLNcDi∫xmDi-LNcDi/2xmDi+LNcDi/2K0ε0xD-α2+K1ε0ReDI1ε0ReDI0ε0xD-α2+2∑n=1∞K0εnxD-α2+K1εnReDI1εnReDI0εnxD-α2cos⁡nπzDhDcos⁡nπzwDhDIt is noted that (19) is only valid to compute the pressure anywhere. We use zD=zwD+rwD to calculate wellbore surface pressure. Dimensionless wellbore radius for an anisotropic reservoir is given as follows.(20)rwD=rwLrefkkz0.25+kkz-0.25According to geometric relations shown in Figure3, mid-point of ith open segment can be determined as follows.(21)xmDi=LcDi+LNcDi+LcD12Figure 3
Schematic of geometric relationship mid-point ofith open segment.With (19) and by applying the superposition principle, the pressure responses at point (xD, yD, zD) caused by all segments can be obtained as follows:(22)p-fDxD,0,zD=∑i=1Np-fDiβD,βDi=∑i=1Nq-DiFDiβD,βDiwhereβD=xD,0,zD; βDi=xDi,0,zDiHowever, it is also required that the sum of the flow rates for each open segment be equal to the total flow rate; that is,(23)∑i=1Nq-Di=1sCombining with (19) and (22), then the matrix form can be formulated as follows.(24)F¯D1βD1,βD1F¯D2βD1,βD2…F¯DNβD1,βDN-1F¯D1βD2,βD1F¯D2βD2,βD2…F¯DNβD2,βDN-1……………F¯D1βDM,βD1F¯D2βD2,βDM…F¯DNβDN,βDN-111…10×q¯D1q¯D2…q¯DNp-wD=00…01sThe dimensionless wellbore flow rate for the constant-pressure production in naturally fractured reservoirs can be determined by dimensionless pressure with the constant-rate production in the Laplace domain [15]:(25)q-D=1s2p-wDIn order to be consistent with current literature, we use the Fetkovich [16] definitions of the dimensionless decline variables (tDd and qDd) which are given below. The tDd function is given in terms of dimensionless variables as(26)tDd=2ReD2tDln⁡ReD-0.5In a similar fashion, theqDd function is given in terms of dimensionless variables as(27)qDd=ln⁡ReD-0.5qDThe rate integral and rate integral derivative functions introduced by McCray [17] are given in dimensionless form below. The dimensionless rate integral function, qDi, is given as(28)qDdi=NpDdtDd=1tDd∫0tDdqDdxdxAnd the dimensionless rate integral derivative function,qDdid,is given as(29)qDdid=qDdid-qDd


## 3.1. Point Source Model

### 3.1.1. Governing Equation

(A) Fracture System. The 3D governing equation describing transient fluid flow in natural fracture system can be written as follows:(1)∂2pf∂r2+1r∂pf∂r+kfvkfh∂2pf∂z2=ϕfCftμkfh∂pf∂t+ϕmCmtμkfh∂pm∂twherer=(x-xw)2+(y-yw)2(B) Matrix System. The 3D governing equation describing transient fluid flow in natural fracture system can be written as follows:(2)αkmkfhpm-pf+ϕmCmμkfh∂pm∂t=0


### 3.1.2. Initial Conditions

The initial pressure is assumed to be equal and is represented by original formation pressure in naturally fractured oil reservoirs; thus(3)pfr,z,t=0=pe(4)pmr,z,t=0=pe


### 3.1.3. Inner and Outer Boundary Conditions

It is assumed that production rate of point source isq~(t); thus inner boundary condition can be written as(5)limε→0⁡∫zw-ε/2zw+ε/2limδ→0⁡2πkfhμr∂pf∂rr=εdz=q~tCorresponding outer boundary conditions can be expressed as for a laterally impermeable boundary, top, and bottom boundaries being(6)
∂
p
f
r
,
z
=
0
,
t
∂
z
=
0
(7)
∂
p
f
r
,
z
=
h
,
t
∂
z
=
0
(8)
∂
p
f
r
=
R
e
,
z
,
t
∂
r
=
0


## 3.1.1. Governing Equation

(A) Fracture System. The 3D governing equation describing transient fluid flow in natural fracture system can be written as follows:(1)∂2pf∂r2+1r∂pf∂r+kfvkfh∂2pf∂z2=ϕfCftμkfh∂pf∂t+ϕmCmtμkfh∂pm∂twherer=(x-xw)2+(y-yw)2(B) Matrix System. The 3D governing equation describing transient fluid flow in natural fracture system can be written as follows:(2)αkmkfhpm-pf+ϕmCmμkfh∂pm∂t=0


## 3.1.2. Initial Conditions

The initial pressure is assumed to be equal and is represented by original formation pressure in naturally fractured oil reservoirs; thus(3)pfr,z,t=0=pe(4)pmr,z,t=0=pe


## 3.1.3. Inner and Outer Boundary Conditions

It is assumed that production rate of point source isq~(t); thus inner boundary condition can be written as(5)limε→0⁡∫zw-ε/2zw+ε/2limδ→0⁡2πkfhμr∂pf∂rr=εdz=q~tCorresponding outer boundary conditions can be expressed as for a laterally impermeable boundary, top, and bottom boundaries being(6)
∂
p
f
r
,
z
=
0
,
t
∂
z
=
0
(7)
∂
p
f
r
,
z
=
h
,
t
∂
z
=
0
(8)
∂
p
f
r
=
R
e
,
z
,
t
∂
r
=
0


## 3.2. Dimensionless Point Source Model in Laplace Domain

According to dimensionless variables definition in Table1, (1)–(8) can be transformed into (9)
∂
2
p
f
D
∂
r
D
2
+
1
r
D
∂
p
f
D
∂
r
D
+
∂
2
p
f
D
∂
z
D
2
=
ω
∂
p
f
D
∂
t
D
+
1
-
ω
∂
p
m
D
∂
t
D
λ
p
m
D
-
p
f
D
+
1
-
ω
∂
p
m
D
∂
t
D
=
0
p
f
D
r
D
,
z
D
,
t
D
=
0
=
0
p
m
D
r
D
,
z
D
,
t
D
=
0
=
0
∂
p
f
D
r
D
,
z
D
=
0
,
t
D
∂
z
D
=
0
∂
p
f
D
r
D
,
z
D
=
h
D
,
t
D
∂
z
D
=
0
∂
p
f
D
r
D
=
R
e
D
,
z
D
,
t
D
∂
r
D
=
0
lim
ε
D
→
0
⁡
∫
z
w
D
-
ε
D
/
2
z
w
D
+
ε
D
/
2
lim
δ
D
→
0
⁡
r
D
∂
p
f
D
∂
r
D
r
D
=
ε
D
d
z
D
=
-
h
D
q
~
D
t
DTable 1
Dimensionless variables definition.
Variables Dimensionless definition Dimensionless pressure of fracture system p f D = 2 π k f h h q s c μ p e - p f  Dimensionless pressure of matrix system p m D = 2 π k f h h q s c μ p e - p m  Dimensionless wellbore pressure p w D = 2 π k f h h q s c μ p e - p w  Dimensionless production time t D = k f h t μ ϕ C t f + m L r e f 2  Dimensionless distance r D = r L r e f  Dimensionless reservoir thickness h D = h L r e f  Dimensionless radius of impermeable circle boundary R e D = R e L r e f  Dimensionless coordinate x D = x L r e f y D = y L r e f z D = z L r e f k f h k f v  Dimensionless x-y-z coordinate of point source x w D = x w L r e f y w D = y w L r e f z w D = z w L r e f k f h k f v  Dimensionless length of open segment L N c D = L N c L r e f  Dimensionless wellbore radius r w D = r w L r e f  Dimensionless mid-point ofith open segment x m D = x m L r e f  Dimensionless continuous production q ~ D = q ~ q s c  Dimensionless infinitesimal vertical distance ε D = ε L r e f  Dimensionless infinitesimal radial distance δ D = δ L r e fFor convenience in derivation, by adopting Laplace transform with respect totD and solving pressure of matrix, respectively, through (9), thus (9) can be expressed as follows in Laplace domain.(10)∂2p-fD∂rD2+1rD∂p-fD∂rD+∂2p-fD∂zD2=up-fD∂p-fDrD,zD=0,s∂zD=0∂p-fDrD,zD=hD,s∂zD=0∂p-fDrD=ReD,zD,s∂rD=0limεD→0⁡∫zwD-εD/2zwD+εD/2limδD→0rD∂p-fD∂rDrD=εDdzD=-hDq~-Dswhereu=λ+sω(1-ω)/λ+s(1-ω)sBy finite cosine transform with respect tozD, (10) can be written as(11)d2p-⌢fDdrD2+1rDdp-⌢fDdrD=u+n2π2hD2p-⌢fDdp-⌢fDrD=ReD,n,s∂rD=0limδD→0⁡rDdp-⌢fDdrDrD=εD=-q~-DshDcos⁡nπzwDhDIn deriving(10), we have used the following finite cosine transform and inverse finite cosine transform.(12)p-⌢fDrD,n,s=∫0hDp-fDrD,zD,scos⁡nπzDhDdzD(13)p-fDrD,zD,s=1hDp-⌢fDrD,0,s+2hD∑n=1∞p-⌢fDrD,n,scos⁡nπzDhD


## 3.3. Model Solution of Point Source

Equation(10) is zero-order Bessel equation and inner and outer boundary conditions; general solution of zero-order Bessel equation can be written as(14)p-⌢fD=AK0εnrD+BI0εnrDwhereεn=u+n2π2/hD2 (n=0,1,2,3…).According to the properties of modified Bessel’s functions and outer boundary condition, the coefficient B can be expressed by(15)B=K1εnReDI1εnReDAHence, (14) also can be written as(16)p-⌢fD=AK0εnrD+K1εnReDI1εnReDI0εnrDCombining with inner boundary condition, the coefficient A in (16) can be determined as follows.(17)A=q~-DhDcos⁡nπzwDhDSubstituting (17) into (16) and employing finite cosine inverse transform, finally, (16) can be written as follows:(18)p-fD=q~-DK0ε0rD+K1ε0ReDI1ε0ReDI0ε0rD+2∑n=1∞K0εnrD+K1εnReDI1εnReDI0εnrDcos⁡nπzDhDcos⁡nπzwDhDEquation (18) is the point source solution in naturally fractured oil reservoirs.


## 3.4. Model Solution of Line Source for SCHWs

Taking the SCHWs shown in Figure1, for example, although rate of the horizontal well in different location, open segments can be seen as a uniform rate horizontal line source for SCHWs. Thus we take the ith open segment as our research object, taking mid-point of ith open segment as origin coordinate. So we can get line source of ith open segment by integrating with respect to xD from xmDi-LNcDi/2 to xmDi-LNcDi/2 for point source in (18). Finally(19)p-fDi=q-DiLNcDi∫xmDi-LNcDi/2xmDi+LNcDi/2K0ε0xD-α2+K1ε0ReDI1ε0ReDI0ε0xD-α2+2∑n=1∞K0εnxD-α2+K1εnReDI1εnReDI0εnxD-α2cos⁡nπzDhDcos⁡nπzwDhDIt is noted that (19) is only valid to compute the pressure anywhere. We use zD=zwD+rwD to calculate wellbore surface pressure. Dimensionless wellbore radius for an anisotropic reservoir is given as follows.(20)rwD=rwLrefkkz0.25+kkz-0.25According to geometric relations shown in Figure3, mid-point of ith open segment can be determined as follows.(21)xmDi=LcDi+LNcDi+LcD12Figure 3
Schematic of geometric relationship mid-point ofith open segment.With (19) and by applying the superposition principle, the pressure responses at point (xD, yD, zD) caused by all segments can be obtained as follows:(22)p-fDxD,0,zD=∑i=1Np-fDiβD,βDi=∑i=1Nq-DiFDiβD,βDiwhereβD=xD,0,zD; βDi=xDi,0,zDiHowever, it is also required that the sum of the flow rates for each open segment be equal to the total flow rate; that is,(23)∑i=1Nq-Di=1sCombining with (19) and (22), then the matrix form can be formulated as follows.(24)F¯D1βD1,βD1F¯D2βD1,βD2…F¯DNβD1,βDN-1F¯D1βD2,βD1F¯D2βD2,βD2…F¯DNβD2,βDN-1……………F¯D1βDM,βD1F¯D2βD2,βDM…F¯DNβDN,βDN-111…10×q¯D1q¯D2…q¯DNp-wD=00…01sThe dimensionless wellbore flow rate for the constant-pressure production in naturally fractured reservoirs can be determined by dimensionless pressure with the constant-rate production in the Laplace domain [15]:(25)q-D=1s2p-wDIn order to be consistent with current literature, we use the Fetkovich [16] definitions of the dimensionless decline variables (tDd and qDd) which are given below. The tDd function is given in terms of dimensionless variables as(26)tDd=2ReD2tDln⁡ReD-0.5In a similar fashion, theqDd function is given in terms of dimensionless variables as(27)qDd=ln⁡ReD-0.5qDThe rate integral and rate integral derivative functions introduced by McCray [17] are given in dimensionless form below. The dimensionless rate integral function, qDi, is given as(28)qDdi=NpDdtDd=1tDd∫0tDdqDdxdxAnd the dimensionless rate integral derivative function,qDdid,is given as(29)qDdid=qDdid-qDd


## 4. Model Verification

To verify the model and solutions derived in the above section, a relatively particular case is considered and pressure and pressure-derivate curves generated by our solution are compared to well-test stimulator Saphir. Fluid flow into wellbore is treated as infinite conductivity, but rate distribution in wellbore is no-uniform. Therefore, based on different dimensionless variable definition between this paper and well-test stimulator, we can setω=0.2 for this paper and well-test stimulator, λ=0.01 for this paper, λ=6.25 × 10−8 with Lref=40 for well-test stimulator. Other parameters can be set as ω=0.2, Lh=400, LNc=40, Lc=0, Nc=0, NNc=10. The comparisons presented in Figure 4 suggest that the results calculated by our model are consistent with that obtained by the well-test simulator, which verifies the credibility of the model presented in this article. At the same time, by analyzing each segment rate distribution in different time, we can confirm imbalanced fluid inflow along the wellbore (see Figure 5).Figure 4
Comparison of the results of this paper with that of well-test simulator.Figure 5
Rate distribution along the wellbore in different time.


## 5. Discussions and Analysis

### 5.1. Flow Regimes

In order to study the flow regimes of SCHWs in naturally fractured oil reservoirs more graphically, type curves of pressure response and production rate performance are illustrated in Figures6 and 7 by Stehfest [18] numerical inversion. According to the dimensionless pressure-derivate characteristic, pressure response curves of SCHWs in naturally fractured oil reservoirs are divided into seven flow regimes and the important basic data is shown in Table 2.Table 2
Important basic data for SCHWs.
Parameters (unit) Value Wellbore radius (m) 0.1 Outer boundary radius (m) 10000 Horizontal well length (m) 400 Length of each open segment (m) 25 Length of each completed segment (m) 100 Number of open segments (dimensionless) 4 Number of completed segments (dimensionless) 3 Reference length (m) 40 Storativity ratio (dimensionless) 0.2 Flow coefficient (dimensionless) 0.01Figure 6
Pressure and pressure derivative responses of SCHWs with 4 open segments.Figure 7
Rate, rate integral, and rate integral derivative responses of SCHWs with 4 open segments.Period I is the first radial (FR) flow period. During this period, the flow regime is radial flow around open segment in vertical direction (see Figure8(a)). The pressure derivative curve is a horizontal line with a value of “1/(4LhD).” Curves of rate, rate integral, and integral derivative exhibit a downward line. Because each length of open segment is different, first radial flow may not occur. If open segment is very small, spherical flow can appear during this period.Figure 8
Schematic of flow stage for SCHWs with 4 open segments.
(a)
First radial flow (b)
First linear flow (c)
Second pseudo-radial flow (d)
Second linear flow (e)
Late pseudo-radial flowPeriod II is first linear (FL) flow period, in which fluid flow in the reservoir is parallel to the upper and lower boundary of the reservoir and each open segment is independent during first linear flow stage (see Figure8(b)). The main characteristic of pressure-derivative is a line with a half slope in this stage. Corresponding rate integral derivative curve becomes gentle in this stage. Similarly, when open segment is shorter compared with complete segment, first linear flow cannot be appearing.Period III is second pseudo-radial (SPR) flow, in which the pressure derivative curve is horizontal line of “0.5/NNc.” This flow period is exhibited when the lateral distance between open segments is relatively large. Before and during this flow period, each open segment has its own drainage area and behaves independently without interference from open segment (see Figure 8(c)).Period IV is second linear (SL) flow. Pressure wave propagates to drainage area controlled by each open segment, and interference between open segments occurs. After the superposition of the pressure waves, pressure waves propagate continually as time goes. The second linear flow can be formed in natural fracture reservoir (see Figure8(d)). The pressure derivative curve during this period is exhibited as a one-half slope straight line again and characteristics of rate integral derivative curve do not appear in this stage.Period V is the cross-flow stage, in which fluid flows into natural fracture from matrix firstly when the SCHWs are put into production. The pressure of natural fracture system will gradually decrease, causing pressure difference between natural fracture system and matrix system. Because existence of pressure drop between natural fracture system and matrix system led to cross-flow from natural fracture system to matrix system, the characteristic of pressure derivative during stage is “dip.” Corresponding rate integral derivative curve also exhibits a “dip” in this stage.Period VI is late pseudo-radial (LPR) flow stage. After cross-flow flow stage, the pressures in natural fracture system and matrix system gradually incline to equilibrium. Pseudo-radial flow around SCHWs is formed in naturally fractured reservoirs (see Figure8(e)). Pressure derivative exhibits a horizontal line of “0.5” during pseudo-radial flow in log-log plot. Corresponding rate integral derivative curve is also a slanted line.Period VII is characteristic of closed boundary. Pressure waves propagate to circular impermeable outer boundary during this stage. Curves of pressure derivative exhibit unite-slope line and corresponding rate integral and derivative curve coincide and exhibit negative unite-slope line.


### 5.2. Sensitivity of Parameters

Figure9 shows the effect of outer boundary radius on dimensionless rate integral qDdi and rate integral derivative qDdid. We can know that outer boundary radius has effect on whole flow regime. With increase of outer boundary radius, the value of dimensionless rate integral and rate integral derivative curves is smaller, which indicates that larger outer boundary radius can lead to the smaller rate decline curves in whole flow regime.Figure 9
The effect of outer boundary radius onqDdi and qDdid.Figure10 shows the effect of storativity ratio on dimensionless rate integral qDdi and rate integral derivative qDdid. It is obvious that storativity ratio mainly has significant effect on FR, FL, SPR, and cross-flow regime. The smaller storativity ratio represents that storativity ability of naturally fractured reservoirs is smaller. It can be clearly observed that the smaller the value of storativity ratio, the deeper and wider the “dip” in rate integral derivative curve during cross-flow. In addition, smaller value of storativity ratio leads to smaller rate integral of FR, FL, and SPR.Figure 10
The effect of storativity ratio onqDdi and qDdid.Figure11 shows the effect of cross-flow coefficient on dimensionless rate integral qDdi and rate integral derivative qDdid. It is obvious that flow coefficient mainly has significant effect on SPR, cross-flow, and LPR regime. The larger cross-flow coefficient represents that cross-flow ability from natural fracture to matrix is larger. It can be clearly observed that the smaller the value of cross-flow coefficient is, the later the “dip” in rate integral derivative curve during cross-flow appears. Duration of LPR regime is shorter.Figure 11
The effect of cross-flow coefficient onqDdi and qDdid.Figures12 and 13 show the effect of number of open (or completed) segments on dimensionless rate integral qDdi and rate integral derivative qDdid. Though number of open (or completed) segments is different, it is assumed that length of SCHWs is equal. Number of completed segments has an effect on SPR, cross-flow, and LR regimes mainly. With increase of completed segment, rate of fluid flow into wellbore decreases under constant wellbore pressure. Therefore, higher number of completed segments can lead to larger value of rate integral derivative curves in log-log plot (see Figure 12). At the same time, increasing number of completed segments can delay water breakthrough and prevent wellbore collapse; it can also lead to small rate for every open segment, which makes total rate decrease under constant wellbore pressure (see Figure 13).Figure 12
The effect of number of open (or completed) segments onqDdi and qDdid.Figure 13
The flux distribution of each open segment.Figures14 and 15 show the effect of length of completed segment on dimensionless rate integral qDdi and rate integral derivative qDdid. It is assumed that lengths of SCHWs and numbers of completed segments are equal, while completed segment length is different. It is obvious that length of completed segment has an effect on each flow regime. Compared with LR regime, length of completed segment has an obvious influence on rate integral derivative curve during FR, FL, SPR, and cross-flow regime. Longer length of completed segment leads to low rate integral derivative, which is caused by larger pressure loss from formation to wellbore (see Figure 14). With the increase of length of completed segment, open segment becomes more and more short. As the time of production continues to increase, longer completed segment makes each open segment rate smaller (see Figure 15).Figure 14
The effect of length of open (or completed) segment onqDdi and qDdid.Figure 15
The flux distribution of each open segment.


## 5.1. Flow Regimes

In order to study the flow regimes of SCHWs in naturally fractured oil reservoirs more graphically, type curves of pressure response and production rate performance are illustrated in Figures6 and 7 by Stehfest [18] numerical inversion. According to the dimensionless pressure-derivate characteristic, pressure response curves of SCHWs in naturally fractured oil reservoirs are divided into seven flow regimes and the important basic data is shown in Table 2.Table 2
Important basic data for SCHWs.
Parameters (unit) Value Wellbore radius (m) 0.1 Outer boundary radius (m) 10000 Horizontal well length (m) 400 Length of each open segment (m) 25 Length of each completed segment (m) 100 Number of open segments (dimensionless) 4 Number of completed segments (dimensionless) 3 Reference length (m) 40 Storativity ratio (dimensionless) 0.2 Flow coefficient (dimensionless) 0.01Figure 6
Pressure and pressure derivative responses of SCHWs with 4 open segments.Figure 7
Rate, rate integral, and rate integral derivative responses of SCHWs with 4 open segments.Period I is the first radial (FR) flow period. During this period, the flow regime is radial flow around open segment in vertical direction (see Figure8(a)). The pressure derivative curve is a horizontal line with a value of “1/(4LhD).” Curves of rate, rate integral, and integral derivative exhibit a downward line. Because each length of open segment is different, first radial flow may not occur. If open segment is very small, spherical flow can appear during this period.Figure 8
Schematic of flow stage for SCHWs with 4 open segments.
(a)
First radial flow (b)
First linear flow (c)
Second pseudo-radial flow (d)
Second linear flow (e)
Late pseudo-radial flowPeriod II is first linear (FL) flow period, in which fluid flow in the reservoir is parallel to the upper and lower boundary of the reservoir and each open segment is independent during first linear flow stage (see Figure8(b)). The main characteristic of pressure-derivative is a line with a half slope in this stage. Corresponding rate integral derivative curve becomes gentle in this stage. Similarly, when open segment is shorter compared with complete segment, first linear flow cannot be appearing.Period III is second pseudo-radial (SPR) flow, in which the pressure derivative curve is horizontal line of “0.5/NNc.” This flow period is exhibited when the lateral distance between open segments is relatively large. Before and during this flow period, each open segment has its own drainage area and behaves independently without interference from open segment (see Figure 8(c)).Period IV is second linear (SL) flow. Pressure wave propagates to drainage area controlled by each open segment, and interference between open segments occurs. After the superposition of the pressure waves, pressure waves propagate continually as time goes. The second linear flow can be formed in natural fracture reservoir (see Figure8(d)). The pressure derivative curve during this period is exhibited as a one-half slope straight line again and characteristics of rate integral derivative curve do not appear in this stage.Period V is the cross-flow stage, in which fluid flows into natural fracture from matrix firstly when the SCHWs are put into production. The pressure of natural fracture system will gradually decrease, causing pressure difference between natural fracture system and matrix system. Because existence of pressure drop between natural fracture system and matrix system led to cross-flow from natural fracture system to matrix system, the characteristic of pressure derivative during stage is “dip.” Corresponding rate integral derivative curve also exhibits a “dip” in this stage.Period VI is late pseudo-radial (LPR) flow stage. After cross-flow flow stage, the pressures in natural fracture system and matrix system gradually incline to equilibrium. Pseudo-radial flow around SCHWs is formed in naturally fractured reservoirs (see Figure8(e)). Pressure derivative exhibits a horizontal line of “0.5” during pseudo-radial flow in log-log plot. Corresponding rate integral derivative curve is also a slanted line.Period VII is characteristic of closed boundary. Pressure waves propagate to circular impermeable outer boundary during this stage. Curves of pressure derivative exhibit unite-slope line and corresponding rate integral and derivative curve coincide and exhibit negative unite-slope line.


## 5.2. Sensitivity of Parameters

Figure9 shows the effect of outer boundary radius on dimensionless rate integral qDdi and rate integral derivative qDdid. We can know that outer boundary radius has effect on whole flow regime. With increase of outer boundary radius, the value of dimensionless rate integral and rate integral derivative curves is smaller, which indicates that larger outer boundary radius can lead to the smaller rate decline curves in whole flow regime.Figure 9
The effect of outer boundary radius onqDdi and qDdid.Figure10 shows the effect of storativity ratio on dimensionless rate integral qDdi and rate integral derivative qDdid. It is obvious that storativity ratio mainly has significant effect on FR, FL, SPR, and cross-flow regime. The smaller storativity ratio represents that storativity ability of naturally fractured reservoirs is smaller. It can be clearly observed that the smaller the value of storativity ratio, the deeper and wider the “dip” in rate integral derivative curve during cross-flow. In addition, smaller value of storativity ratio leads to smaller rate integral of FR, FL, and SPR.Figure 10
The effect of storativity ratio onqDdi and qDdid.Figure11 shows the effect of cross-flow coefficient on dimensionless rate integral qDdi and rate integral derivative qDdid. It is obvious that flow coefficient mainly has significant effect on SPR, cross-flow, and LPR regime. The larger cross-flow coefficient represents that cross-flow ability from natural fracture to matrix is larger. It can be clearly observed that the smaller the value of cross-flow coefficient is, the later the “dip” in rate integral derivative curve during cross-flow appears. Duration of LPR regime is shorter.Figure 11
The effect of cross-flow coefficient onqDdi and qDdid.Figures12 and 13 show the effect of number of open (or completed) segments on dimensionless rate integral qDdi and rate integral derivative qDdid. Though number of open (or completed) segments is different, it is assumed that length of SCHWs is equal. Number of completed segments has an effect on SPR, cross-flow, and LR regimes mainly. With increase of completed segment, rate of fluid flow into wellbore decreases under constant wellbore pressure. Therefore, higher number of completed segments can lead to larger value of rate integral derivative curves in log-log plot (see Figure 12). At the same time, increasing number of completed segments can delay water breakthrough and prevent wellbore collapse; it can also lead to small rate for every open segment, which makes total rate decrease under constant wellbore pressure (see Figure 13).Figure 12
The effect of number of open (or completed) segments onqDdi and qDdid.Figure 13
The flux distribution of each open segment.Figures14 and 15 show the effect of length of completed segment on dimensionless rate integral qDdi and rate integral derivative qDdid. It is assumed that lengths of SCHWs and numbers of completed segments are equal, while completed segment length is different. It is obvious that length of completed segment has an effect on each flow regime. Compared with LR regime, length of completed segment has an obvious influence on rate integral derivative curve during FR, FL, SPR, and cross-flow regime. Longer length of completed segment leads to low rate integral derivative, which is caused by larger pressure loss from formation to wellbore (see Figure 14). With the increase of length of completed segment, open segment becomes more and more short. As the time of production continues to increase, longer completed segment makes each open segment rate smaller (see Figure 15).Figure 14
The effect of length of open (or completed) segment onqDdi and qDdid.Figure 15
The flux distribution of each open segment.


## 6. Conclusion

In this work, we have developed a solution to compute the rate decline of SCHWs with constant wellbore pressure. According to characteristic of pressure-derivative curves under constant production and rate integral derivative curve under constant wellbore pressure, flow regimes of SCHWs are identified. Specific conclusions can be drawn as follows.( 1 ) An analytical model is proposed in this paper to obtain rate decline response and flux distribution of SCHWs in naturally fractured reservoirs under constant wellbore pressure. Pressure transient responses and Blasingame rate decline curve are generated and discussed.( 2 ) In addition, the seven flow periods observed for SCHWs mainly include first radial flow, first linear flow, second pseudo-radial flow, second pseudo-radial flow, second linear flow, late pseudo-radial flow stage, and characteristic of closed boundary.( 3 ) By comparing results of simplified model in this paper with the results calculated by Saphir for horizontal well in naturally fractured reservoirs, the results showed excellent agreement. Imbalanced flux distribution along the wellbore is verified again.( 4 ) The model illustrated how the dimensionless rate integral and rate integral derivative log-log curves are influenced by some parameters (such as outer boundary radius, storativity ratio, cross-flow coefficient, and number and length of open segments).( 5 ) The proposed model in this paper can be used to interpret rate decline signals more accurately for SCHWs in naturally fractured oil reservoirs and provide more accurate dynamic parameters which are important for efficient reservoir development.



---

*Source: 7281090-2019-04-18.xml*