# Polymer Composites Based on Plasticized PVC and Vulcanized Nitrile Rubber Waste Powder for Irrigation Pipes

Authors: Maria Daniela Stelescu
Journal: ISRN Materials Science
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

The paper presents the technique of production and characterization of polymer composites based on plasticized PVC and rubber powder from vulcanized nitrile rubber waste. The new polymer composites have lower hardness, higher elongation at break, a better tensile strength, and better ozone resistance, and the blend suitable for irrigations pipes for agricultural use was selected. The selected polymer composites have a good behavior under accelerated aging, repeated flexion at room temperature and at low temperature (−20°C), a very good behavior for immersion in water, concentrated acid and basis, animal fat, soya, and sun flower oil, proving their suitability for gaskets, hoses, protection equipment, rubber footwear, and so forth. The resulted thermoplastic polymer composites can be processed by injection, extrusion, and compression molding.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

An efficient reclaiming of wastes resulted from the manufacture of mechanical rubber goods can be achieved by their use in producing composite thermoplastic elastomer materials [1, 2]. These composites can be used as thermoplastic material substitutes. Such substitutions can result in lower costs because of savings in thermoplastic materials while enabling the industrial rubber wastes to be reclaimed. Furthermore, the manufacture of such materials yields no wastes because of the spews and refuses being recycled. Composite materials based on thermoplastic and rubber powder are produced by mixing a dispersed elastic filler and a thermoplastic in a melt at a temperature above the melting point of the thermoplastic matrix on extruder-granulator, in Brabender plasticorder or on electrically heated roller mill. These materials are processed/moulded by a technique similar to those used in processing plastics and rubber blends (pressing, injection, extruded, etc.) [1–7].The paper presents our work for producing polymer composites based on plasticized PVC and rubber powder from vulcanized nitrile rubber (NBR) waste and testing their characteristics. It deals with fitting the material characteristics in the standards for materials used for irrigation pipes.Poly (vinyl chloride) (PVC) is a versatile polymer, used in flexible, semirigid, and rigid forms. In worldwide plastic production, it is second only to polyolefins. The rapid expansion and consumption of PVC is due to lower cost, greater availability, good mechanical properties, and diversity of its properties [8, 9]. One of the most prominent needs for PVC in application end use is permanent plasticization. A very important and commercially significant blend is that of NBR and PVC. NBR acts as a permanent plasticizer for PVC, and at the same time PVC improves the ozone, thermal ageing, and chemical resistance of NBR. The presence of PVC improves aging resistance of NBR as both PVC and NBR are polar, and blending NBR with PVC increases the compatibility [10, 11].Regarding this aspect, composites based on PVC/vulcanized NBR rubber powder do not need any compatibility agents in order to improve their characteristics.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Materials

Materials used to obtain the polymer composites based on plasticized polyvinyl chloride and vulcanized nitrile rubber powder are as follows:(1) plasticized PVC prepared from PVC with a 64 K-wert value (moisture and volatile 0.2%, absorption of plasticizer DOP 100%), dioctyl phthalate (DOP) (density 0.984 g/cm3, pH 7, 99.5% purity), PVC stabilizer LGP 8008 (diatomic lead phosphite content 10%–30%, tribasic lead sulphate content 30%–60%, lead stearate diatomic content 10%–30%), zinc stearate (Zn content 11%, melting point 127°C), and antioxidant Uvinul 5050H (density 0.99 g/cm3, melting temperature range 95–125°C, heat stability higher than 300°C, pH 7), (2) vulcanized nitrile rubber powder obtained by buffing the rubberized metallic rolls when correcting them. It was subjected to chemical tests and the results are shown in Table 1.Acetone extract value (23.86%) reveals such matters as free sulphur, curing accelerators, antioxidants, resins, plasticizers, lubricants, and monomers being present in the elastomers. Ash value (19.61%) reveals the presence of such fillers as metal oxides (zinc oxide), chalk precipitate, and other passive fillers. HCl insoluble matter value (8.85%) reveals the active filler such as silica precipitate being present in the rubber blends used in preparing rubber waste powder [7].Table 1
Rubber powder characteristics.
Reference  number
Characteristic
Value
[1]
Acetone extract, %
23.86
[2]
Ash, %
19.61
[3]
HCl insoluble matter, %
8.85


#### 2.1.1. Polymer Composites Preparation

Polymer composites were obtained in two stages:(1) PVC plasticizing and (2) preparing blends based on vulcanized nitrile rubber powder and plasticized PVC.(1)
PVC plasticizing was accomplished by plasticizer (DOP) absorption into PVC when mixing in a 2 L vessel of plasticorder PLV 330 Brabender at 70 rpm, temperature of 40°C for 10 min. For a good thermal stability, temperature stabilizer and antioxidants have been introduced over time. The resulted plasticized PVC is processed into a sheet on a laboratory roll electrically heated, the resulted sheet being used in the next stage in the blend preparation.(2)
Preparing the experimental polymer composites based on plasticized PVC and NBR rubber powder on the laboratory electrically heated roller mill. Process variables were as follows: temperature: 140–170°C, friction coefficient: 1 : 1.24. The ingredient addition sequence: plasticized PVC (7–15′), rubber powder (5–10′), homogenization, and removing from the roller mill (3–5′).Table2 presents the recipe of NBR rubber powder/PVC plasticizing blends.Table 2
Formulations of the polymer composites based on plasticized PVC/vulcanized NBR rubber powder.
Reference  number
Ingredients/blends
C1
C2
[1]
NBR rubber powder, g
75
135
[2]
PVC, g
150
150
[3]
DOP, g
75
75
[4]
LGR 8008, g
6
6
[5]
Zinc stearate, g
0.75
0.75
[6]
Uvinul 5050, g
1.5
1.5The resulted polymer composites weregranulated in a laboratory extruder granulator, equipped with a heating system (at 160–175°C) in three stages, a granulating device, knives, and cooling system.Test samples intended for the blend characterization were prepared both by compression molding into 2 × 150 × 150 mm sheets on a laboratory vulcanizing press at a temperature of 160°C and pressure of 150 MPa for 10 minutes and by injection in a two nest mold using an injection device at 165°C and 2′ cooling time. The molded samples were stored away from light, at room temperature.


#### 2.1.2. Laboratory Tests

Mechanical properties of samples were measured on a Schopper tensile tester with a nominal rate of the traverse of the moving grip of 460 mm/min. Modulus at 100% strain, tensile strength, and elongation at break tests were carried out according to the conditions described in ISO 37/2012, on dumb-bell shaped specimens of type 2 (the precision and the uncertainties of the test are ±0.64 for tensile strength and ±2.95 for elongation at break). Tearing strength tests were carried out using angular test pieces (type II) according to SR EN 12771/2003. Hardness of materials was measured using the Shore A scale with samples of 6 mm thickness, by using a hardener tester according to ISO 7619-1/2011 (the precision and the uncertainties of the test are ±0.05). Elasticity was evaluated with a Schob test machine using 6 mm thick samples, according to ISO 4662/2009. Residual elongation is the elongation of a specimen measured 1 minute after rupture in a tensile test. It was calculated using the following formula:(1)Residualelongation(%)=[L-L0L0]×100,
where L0 is the initial length between two marks and L is the length between the marks 1 minute after the sample broke in a tensile test.Accelerated ageing trial was done according to SR ISO 188/2007 using the hot air circulation oven method. Similar samples to those used for tensile testing and for hardness determination were used. Test duration was of 7 days and temperature of 70 ± 1°C. The results were compared with those from samples not subjected to ageing.The densities of elastomer samples were measured according to ISO 2781/2010 (the precision and the uncertainties of the test are ±0.09).Determining abrasion resistance was done according to ISO 4649/2010, the cylinder method, using a pressure of 10 N. Abrasion resistance was expressed by relative volume loss in relation to calibrated abrasive paper. A wearing tester with abrasive cloth and abrasive based on normal electro-corundum on dressed cloth substrate with granulation of 212–80 μm (PE 80), whose abrasiveness must be of 180–220 mg control rubber. The samples used were obtained from rolled blends and pressed by cutting with a rotating die and have cylindrical shape, with a diameter of 16 mm and height of min. 6 mm. The precision and the uncertainties of the test are ±0.15.Flexion resistance (Ross Flex) was determined according to SR 7645/1994. Samples were obtained by punching rubber plates and have rectangular shape. The trial was performed using a Ross Flex device, monitoring crack marks on each sample at intervals of 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 96 h. The precision and the uncertainties of the test are ±300.Resistance to swelling by liquids was determined according to ISO 1817/2005 by the change in mass and volume using the following method: the test pieces of known weight (W1) and volume (V1) were immersed in various solvents: water, sun flower oil, soya oil, animal fat, sulfuric acid 70%, nitric acid 50%, caustic soda 50%, isooctane, toluene, 70% isooctane, and 30% toluene solution, in diffusion test bottles and kept at room temperature for 22 h. After immersion, the samples were taken out from the solvents, and the wet surfaces were quickly dried using a tissue paper and reweighted (W2), respectively, (V2). Swelling index (%) was calculated by the following equation:
(2)changeinweigh=[(W2-W1)×100]W1,changeinvolume=[(V2-V1)×100]V1.The precision and the uncertainties of the test are ±0.04.Ozone resistance was determined using a MAST-700-1 device according to SR ISO 1431-1/2002.For rubber powder, determine the ash in accordance with method a of ISO 247:2006 and determine the acetone extract in accordance with method a of ISO 1407:2011.All measurements were taken several times and the result values were averaged on three to five measurements.


## 2.1. Materials

Materials used to obtain the polymer composites based on plasticized polyvinyl chloride and vulcanized nitrile rubber powder are as follows:(1) plasticized PVC prepared from PVC with a 64 K-wert value (moisture and volatile 0.2%, absorption of plasticizer DOP 100%), dioctyl phthalate (DOP) (density 0.984 g/cm3, pH 7, 99.5% purity), PVC stabilizer LGP 8008 (diatomic lead phosphite content 10%–30%, tribasic lead sulphate content 30%–60%, lead stearate diatomic content 10%–30%), zinc stearate (Zn content 11%, melting point 127°C), and antioxidant Uvinul 5050H (density 0.99 g/cm3, melting temperature range 95–125°C, heat stability higher than 300°C, pH 7), (2) vulcanized nitrile rubber powder obtained by buffing the rubberized metallic rolls when correcting them. It was subjected to chemical tests and the results are shown in Table 1.Acetone extract value (23.86%) reveals such matters as free sulphur, curing accelerators, antioxidants, resins, plasticizers, lubricants, and monomers being present in the elastomers. Ash value (19.61%) reveals the presence of such fillers as metal oxides (zinc oxide), chalk precipitate, and other passive fillers. HCl insoluble matter value (8.85%) reveals the active filler such as silica precipitate being present in the rubber blends used in preparing rubber waste powder [7].Table 1
Rubber powder characteristics.
Reference  number
Characteristic
Value
[1]
Acetone extract, %
23.86
[2]
Ash, %
19.61
[3]
HCl insoluble matter, %
8.85


### 2.1.1. Polymer Composites Preparation

Polymer composites were obtained in two stages:(1) PVC plasticizing and (2) preparing blends based on vulcanized nitrile rubber powder and plasticized PVC.(1)
PVC plasticizing was accomplished by plasticizer (DOP) absorption into PVC when mixing in a 2 L vessel of plasticorder PLV 330 Brabender at 70 rpm, temperature of 40°C for 10 min. For a good thermal stability, temperature stabilizer and antioxidants have been introduced over time. The resulted plasticized PVC is processed into a sheet on a laboratory roll electrically heated, the resulted sheet being used in the next stage in the blend preparation.(2)
Preparing the experimental polymer composites based on plasticized PVC and NBR rubber powder on the laboratory electrically heated roller mill. Process variables were as follows: temperature: 140–170°C, friction coefficient: 1 : 1.24. The ingredient addition sequence: plasticized PVC (7–15′), rubber powder (5–10′), homogenization, and removing from the roller mill (3–5′).Table2 presents the recipe of NBR rubber powder/PVC plasticizing blends.Table 2
Formulations of the polymer composites based on plasticized PVC/vulcanized NBR rubber powder.
Reference  number
Ingredients/blends
C1
C2
[1]
NBR rubber powder, g
75
135
[2]
PVC, g
150
150
[3]
DOP, g
75
75
[4]
LGR 8008, g
6
6
[5]
Zinc stearate, g
0.75
0.75
[6]
Uvinul 5050, g
1.5
1.5The resulted polymer composites weregranulated in a laboratory extruder granulator, equipped with a heating system (at 160–175°C) in three stages, a granulating device, knives, and cooling system.Test samples intended for the blend characterization were prepared both by compression molding into 2 × 150 × 150 mm sheets on a laboratory vulcanizing press at a temperature of 160°C and pressure of 150 MPa for 10 minutes and by injection in a two nest mold using an injection device at 165°C and 2′ cooling time. The molded samples were stored away from light, at room temperature.


### 2.1.2. Laboratory Tests

Mechanical properties of samples were measured on a Schopper tensile tester with a nominal rate of the traverse of the moving grip of 460 mm/min. Modulus at 100% strain, tensile strength, and elongation at break tests were carried out according to the conditions described in ISO 37/2012, on dumb-bell shaped specimens of type 2 (the precision and the uncertainties of the test are ±0.64 for tensile strength and ±2.95 for elongation at break). Tearing strength tests were carried out using angular test pieces (type II) according to SR EN 12771/2003. Hardness of materials was measured using the Shore A scale with samples of 6 mm thickness, by using a hardener tester according to ISO 7619-1/2011 (the precision and the uncertainties of the test are ±0.05). Elasticity was evaluated with a Schob test machine using 6 mm thick samples, according to ISO 4662/2009. Residual elongation is the elongation of a specimen measured 1 minute after rupture in a tensile test. It was calculated using the following formula:(1)Residualelongation(%)=[L-L0L0]×100,
where L0 is the initial length between two marks and L is the length between the marks 1 minute after the sample broke in a tensile test.Accelerated ageing trial was done according to SR ISO 188/2007 using the hot air circulation oven method. Similar samples to those used for tensile testing and for hardness determination were used. Test duration was of 7 days and temperature of 70 ± 1°C. The results were compared with those from samples not subjected to ageing.The densities of elastomer samples were measured according to ISO 2781/2010 (the precision and the uncertainties of the test are ±0.09).Determining abrasion resistance was done according to ISO 4649/2010, the cylinder method, using a pressure of 10 N. Abrasion resistance was expressed by relative volume loss in relation to calibrated abrasive paper. A wearing tester with abrasive cloth and abrasive based on normal electro-corundum on dressed cloth substrate with granulation of 212–80 μm (PE 80), whose abrasiveness must be of 180–220 mg control rubber. The samples used were obtained from rolled blends and pressed by cutting with a rotating die and have cylindrical shape, with a diameter of 16 mm and height of min. 6 mm. The precision and the uncertainties of the test are ±0.15.Flexion resistance (Ross Flex) was determined according to SR 7645/1994. Samples were obtained by punching rubber plates and have rectangular shape. The trial was performed using a Ross Flex device, monitoring crack marks on each sample at intervals of 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 96 h. The precision and the uncertainties of the test are ±300.Resistance to swelling by liquids was determined according to ISO 1817/2005 by the change in mass and volume using the following method: the test pieces of known weight (W1) and volume (V1) were immersed in various solvents: water, sun flower oil, soya oil, animal fat, sulfuric acid 70%, nitric acid 50%, caustic soda 50%, isooctane, toluene, 70% isooctane, and 30% toluene solution, in diffusion test bottles and kept at room temperature for 22 h. After immersion, the samples were taken out from the solvents, and the wet surfaces were quickly dried using a tissue paper and reweighted (W2), respectively, (V2). Swelling index (%) was calculated by the following equation:
(2)changeinweigh=[(W2-W1)×100]W1,changeinvolume=[(V2-V1)×100]V1.The precision and the uncertainties of the test are ±0.04.Ozone resistance was determined using a MAST-700-1 device according to SR ISO 1431-1/2002.For rubber powder, determine the ash in accordance with method a of ISO 247:2006 and determine the acetone extract in accordance with method a of ISO 1407:2011.All measurements were taken several times and the result values were averaged on three to five measurements.


## 2.1.1. Polymer Composites Preparation

Polymer composites were obtained in two stages:(1) PVC plasticizing and (2) preparing blends based on vulcanized nitrile rubber powder and plasticized PVC.(1)
PVC plasticizing was accomplished by plasticizer (DOP) absorption into PVC when mixing in a 2 L vessel of plasticorder PLV 330 Brabender at 70 rpm, temperature of 40°C for 10 min. For a good thermal stability, temperature stabilizer and antioxidants have been introduced over time. The resulted plasticized PVC is processed into a sheet on a laboratory roll electrically heated, the resulted sheet being used in the next stage in the blend preparation.(2)
Preparing the experimental polymer composites based on plasticized PVC and NBR rubber powder on the laboratory electrically heated roller mill. Process variables were as follows: temperature: 140–170°C, friction coefficient: 1 : 1.24. The ingredient addition sequence: plasticized PVC (7–15′), rubber powder (5–10′), homogenization, and removing from the roller mill (3–5′).Table2 presents the recipe of NBR rubber powder/PVC plasticizing blends.Table 2
Formulations of the polymer composites based on plasticized PVC/vulcanized NBR rubber powder.
Reference  number
Ingredients/blends
C1
C2
[1]
NBR rubber powder, g
75
135
[2]
PVC, g
150
150
[3]
DOP, g
75
75
[4]
LGR 8008, g
6
6
[5]
Zinc stearate, g
0.75
0.75
[6]
Uvinul 5050, g
1.5
1.5The resulted polymer composites weregranulated in a laboratory extruder granulator, equipped with a heating system (at 160–175°C) in three stages, a granulating device, knives, and cooling system.Test samples intended for the blend characterization were prepared both by compression molding into 2 × 150 × 150 mm sheets on a laboratory vulcanizing press at a temperature of 160°C and pressure of 150 MPa for 10 minutes and by injection in a two nest mold using an injection device at 165°C and 2′ cooling time. The molded samples were stored away from light, at room temperature.


## 2.1.2. Laboratory Tests

Mechanical properties of samples were measured on a Schopper tensile tester with a nominal rate of the traverse of the moving grip of 460 mm/min. Modulus at 100% strain, tensile strength, and elongation at break tests were carried out according to the conditions described in ISO 37/2012, on dumb-bell shaped specimens of type 2 (the precision and the uncertainties of the test are ±0.64 for tensile strength and ±2.95 for elongation at break). Tearing strength tests were carried out using angular test pieces (type II) according to SR EN 12771/2003. Hardness of materials was measured using the Shore A scale with samples of 6 mm thickness, by using a hardener tester according to ISO 7619-1/2011 (the precision and the uncertainties of the test are ±0.05). Elasticity was evaluated with a Schob test machine using 6 mm thick samples, according to ISO 4662/2009. Residual elongation is the elongation of a specimen measured 1 minute after rupture in a tensile test. It was calculated using the following formula:(1)Residualelongation(%)=[L-L0L0]×100,
where L0 is the initial length between two marks and L is the length between the marks 1 minute after the sample broke in a tensile test.Accelerated ageing trial was done according to SR ISO 188/2007 using the hot air circulation oven method. Similar samples to those used for tensile testing and for hardness determination were used. Test duration was of 7 days and temperature of 70 ± 1°C. The results were compared with those from samples not subjected to ageing.The densities of elastomer samples were measured according to ISO 2781/2010 (the precision and the uncertainties of the test are ±0.09).Determining abrasion resistance was done according to ISO 4649/2010, the cylinder method, using a pressure of 10 N. Abrasion resistance was expressed by relative volume loss in relation to calibrated abrasive paper. A wearing tester with abrasive cloth and abrasive based on normal electro-corundum on dressed cloth substrate with granulation of 212–80 μm (PE 80), whose abrasiveness must be of 180–220 mg control rubber. The samples used were obtained from rolled blends and pressed by cutting with a rotating die and have cylindrical shape, with a diameter of 16 mm and height of min. 6 mm. The precision and the uncertainties of the test are ±0.15.Flexion resistance (Ross Flex) was determined according to SR 7645/1994. Samples were obtained by punching rubber plates and have rectangular shape. The trial was performed using a Ross Flex device, monitoring crack marks on each sample at intervals of 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 96 h. The precision and the uncertainties of the test are ±300.Resistance to swelling by liquids was determined according to ISO 1817/2005 by the change in mass and volume using the following method: the test pieces of known weight (W1) and volume (V1) were immersed in various solvents: water, sun flower oil, soya oil, animal fat, sulfuric acid 70%, nitric acid 50%, caustic soda 50%, isooctane, toluene, 70% isooctane, and 30% toluene solution, in diffusion test bottles and kept at room temperature for 22 h. After immersion, the samples were taken out from the solvents, and the wet surfaces were quickly dried using a tissue paper and reweighted (W2), respectively, (V2). Swelling index (%) was calculated by the following equation:
(2)changeinweigh=[(W2-W1)×100]W1,changeinvolume=[(V2-V1)×100]V1.The precision and the uncertainties of the test are ±0.04.Ozone resistance was determined using a MAST-700-1 device according to SR ISO 1431-1/2002.For rubber powder, determine the ash in accordance with method a of ISO 247:2006 and determine the acetone extract in accordance with method a of ISO 1407:2011.All measurements were taken several times and the result values were averaged on three to five measurements.


## 3. Results and Discussions

In Table3, the characteristics of the PVC/vulcanized NBR rubber powder composites are shown determined on injected and compression molded samples.Table 3
Physical-mechanical characteristics for the polymer composites based on PVC plasticized/vulcanized NBR rubber powder.
Reference number
Characteristics/blends
The uncertainties of tests
C1 compression molded sample
C1 injected sample
C2 compression molded sample
C2 injected sample
Limits according to STAS 10040-74
[1]
Hardness, °ShA,
±0.05
73
73
71
65
70
±
5
[2]
Elasticity, %,
7
8
8
10
[3]
100% modulus, N/mm2
5.1
4.1
3.8
2.7
[4]
Tensile strength, N/mm2
±0.64
10.6
9.7
10.4
9.5
Min. 6,37
[5]
Elongation at break, %
±2.95
300
300
393
420
Min. 300
[6]
Residual elongation, %
20
21
17
20
[7]
Tear strength, N/mm
56
50
40
46
[8]
density, g/cm3
±0.09
1.24
1.24
1.23
1.22
[9]
Resistance to abrasion, mm3
±0.15
141
139
139
134
[10]
Ozone resistance for 100 h, 30°C, 200 pphm ozone concentration and a 20% tension
No visible cracks under a 2X magnification
No visible cracks under a 2X magnification
No visible cracks under a 2X magnification
No visible cracks under a 2X magnification
No visible cracks under a 2X magnificationThe data in Table3 show that the values for physical mechanical characteristics for compression molded samples, and injected samples are similar excepting: (1) a slight decrease of elasticity, (2) a slight decrease of tensile strength and 100% modulus, and (3) a decrease for hardness for C2 from 71 to 65 ShA. The values are in the limits of STAS 10040-74 for irrigation flexible pipes.The increase of rubber powder quantity leads to an increase of hardness, 100% modulus, tear strength, and a decrease of elongation at break. Similar modification of characteristics due to the increase of rubber powder quantity was determined also by other researchers [2, 12–14].C1 composite was selected for the production of irrigation hose, and further characterization was conducted in order to determine other fields of use.The results (Table4) prove that the new polymer composites have a good behavior for accelerated aging (a decrease of hardness of only 1°ShA and elongation at break and tearing resistance variation is under 5%), behave well on repeated flexions at room temperature and at low temperature (−20°C), and are resistant to water, concentrated acids and basis, animal fat, soya and sun flower oil, isooctane, and low resistance to toluene and toluene isooctane solution. According to the physical mechanical properties (Tables 3 and 4), the following fields of use were chosen: gaskets (extruded gaskets, general use gaskets excepting oil industry), rubber items for the automotive industry (rubber mats, seals), hoses and rubber pipes (rubber pipes for mud draining, for heating railroad cars, suction hoses, oxygen and acetylene welding hose, hoses for mobile irrigation systems, hoses for acid or basic solutions, etc.), rubber footwear, and rubber protection equipment (water and fat resistant boots), and so forth.Table 4
Physical-mechanical characteristics for the selected polymer composites.
Reference  number
Characteristics
UM
The uncertaintiesof tests
Value
[1]
Properties after accelerated ageing70°C  × 168h
Hardness, °ShA,
°ShA
±0.05
75
Elasticity, %,
%
9
100% modulus, N/mm2
N/mm2
4,9
Tensile strength, N/mm2
N/mm2
±0.64
9,5
Elongation at break, %
%
±2.95
333
Residual elongation, %
%
20
Tear strength, N/mm
N/mm
52,5
[2]
Ross Flex flexions at23°C (no. of cycles)
±300
(i)  la  −20°C
Flexions
216000
(ii)  la +23°C
Flexions
>150000
[3]
Determination of resistance to liquids
±0.04
Water 20°C, 22 h
(i) Change in mass
%
0
(ii) Change in volume
%
−0,8
Water 70°C, 22 h
(i) Change in mass
%
−1,04
(ii) Change in volume
%
−0,61
Sulfuric acid (H2SO4) 70%
(i) Change in mass
%
0,29
(ii) Change in volume
%
−0,55
Nitric acid (HNO3) 50%
(i) Change in mass
%
4,7
(ii) Change in volume
%
2,8
Caustic soda (NaOH) 50%
(i) Change in mass
%
0,24
(ii) Change in volume
%
−0,21
Sun flower oil
(i) Change in mass
%
−0,3
(ii) Change in volume
%
−0,56
Soya oil
(i) Change in mass
%
0,82
(ii) Change in volume
%
1,23
Animal fat
(i) Change in mass
%
0,65
(ii) Change in volume
%
1,16
Toluene
(i) Change in mass
%
64,6
(ii) Change in volume
%
94,6
Isooctane
(i) Change in mass
%
0
(ii) Change in volume
%
1,12
70% isooctane and  30% toluene solution
(i) Change in mass
%
12,8
(ii) Change in volume
%
22


## 4. Conclusions

Blending vulcanized nitrile rubber waste powder with plasticized PVC was obtained blends low hardness, high elongation at break, and high tensile strength. Two kinds of composites were produced and characterized in order to select the most suitable for irrigation pipes production. The results show for the selected polymer composites a good behavior to accelerated aging, to repeated flexions at room temperature and low temperature (−20°C), a very good resistance to water, acids and basis, animal fat, sun flower oil, and isooctane. According to these properties the selected blend is suitable to the next fields of use: gaskets, rubber hoses and pipes, rubber footwear, rubber protection equipment.The resulted polymer composites can be used in the manufacture of a large range of products, like hoses, gaskets, shoe heels, joint packs, slab pavements in sport halls, and so forth, with competitive characteristics as compared to the similar products from virgin materials [4, 5, 7].This is an efficient procedure for rubber waste reclamation as a result of polymer composites employed as substitutes for thermoplastics—thus resulting in material savings, rubber waste recycling, no wastes resulted from polymer composite processing, as the fleshes and refuses can be recycled. These composites can be processed by some techniques similar to those for plastics and  rubber blends (pressing, injection, extrusion, etc.) [5, 6].



---

*Source: 726121-2013-08-19.xml*