# Robust Control of the Knee Joint Angle of Paraplegic Patients considering Norm-Bounded Uncertainties

Authors: Nilson Moutinho dos Santos; Ruberlei Gaino; Márcio Roberto Covacic; Marcelo Carvalho Minhoto Teixeira; Aparecido Augusto de Carvalho; Edvaldo Assunção; Rodrigo Cardim; Marcelo Augusto Assunção Sanches
Journal: Mathematical Problems in Engineering
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

A proposal for the knee position control design of paraplegic patients with functional electrical stimulation (FES) using control systems and considering norm-bounded uncertainties is presented. A state-space representation of the knee joint model of the paraplegic patient with its nonlinearity is also demonstrated. The use of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) in control systems with norm-bounded uncertainties for asymptotic stability is analyzed. The model was simulated in the Matlab environment. The matrixK of state space feedback was obtained through LMIs.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The application of electrical stimulation in a person’s muscle, more particularly in his motor neurons, causes involuntary contraction of this muscle [1].In order to obtain a muscle contraction it is necessary that the amplitude (or intensity) and duration of the electrical stimulus are inside specific bounds. Then an action potential (AP) is generated and propagates in both directions of the nerve fiber. Complex mechanisms of electrochemical stimuli occur in the neuromuscular structure causing the process of excitation-contraction coupling responsible for the movement of the leg [2].The modulation of the force by a number of muscle fibers recruited and the speed of fiber recruitment depends on several parameters. Some of these parameters include the proximity of the nerve fiber and the electrode, the electrode diameter, and the variation of the number of active states of the fibers due the variation of the amplitude or pulse duration. As can be seen in Figure1, the degree of muscle activation, α, is a nonlinear function. It depends on the duration of the stimulus, d [3].Figure 1
Fibers recruitment curve (the black circles are activated fibers) [3].Muscle is a highly complex nonlinear system, capable of producing the same output for a variety of inputs. A property exploited by physiologically activated muscle is its effort to minimize fatigue [4].Several researchers have used FES to restore some motion activities of persons with injured spinal cord [5]. However, FES is not yet a regular clinical method, because the amount of effort involved in using actual stimulation systems still outweighs the functional benefits they provide.One serious problem when using FES is that artificially activated muscles fatigue at a faster rate than those activated by the natural physiological processes. Due to these problems, a considerable effort has been directed toward developing FES systems based on closed loop control.Ferrarin and Pedotti developed a dynamic model for the relationship between electrical stimulus and joint torque [5]. In their paper, the dynamics of the lower limb were represented by a nonlinear second-order model, which took into account the gravitational and inertial characteristics of the anatomical segment as well as the damping and stiffness properties of the knee joint.Considering that when the quadriceps is electrically stimulated its response is nonlinear, Teixeira et al. [7] proposed a nonlinear controller with the aim of controlling the position of the leg of a paraplegic patient [7]. The authors designed a controller to vary the knee joint angle using Takagy-Sugeno fuzzy models. When electrical stimulation is applied to the quadriceps of a patient, using the controller, the knee joint angle can be varied from 0∘ to 30∘. The authors considered the leg mathematical model proposed by [5], and they showed that, for the conditions considered in their experiments, a simple one-pole transfer function was able to model the relationship between stimulus pulse width and active muscle torque [8].This paper presents a proposal for the leg position control design of paraplegic patients with FES using control systems with uncertainties bounded in norm and a feedback signal obtained from an electrogoniometer which is the most commonly used sensor for measuring the knee joint angle.As mentioned in [9] “Complex control systems have been recently employed to control the communications among computers, controllers, and sensors due to the enlarging scale of control systems in nowadays applications.” Nowadays, it is a very important issue for dynamic systems design.


## 2. Nonlinear Knee Joint Model

As observed by Gaino et al. in [6], the FES systems based on open-loop control have some shortcomings related to the lack of sensitivity to both external disturbances and changes in internal parameters. On the other hand, FES systems based on closed loop control allow real-time measurement of the motion produced by means of sensors and provide a stimulation pattern with the appropriate modulation [5]. This allows the optimization of the neurostimulator pulse width with consequent reduction of muscle fatigue. Furthermore, Gaino et al. demonstrated in [6] that the feedback signal related to the angle of the knee joint may be obtained by using electrogoniometers.The chosen plant is the knee joint, and the open kinematic chain is made of two rigid segments: the thigh and shank-foot complex [5], illustrated in Figure 2. It allows us to study the relationship between the major parameters of input stimulation and the torque of the knee joint. In other words, the pulse width with the output represented by the torque of the active knee joint produced by muscles is stimulated under nonisometric conditions [10]. The ankle was fixed using a plastic ankle foot orthosis (AFO), reducing the number of plant’s degrees of freedom, causing the length of biarticular muscles to depend only on the position of the knee joint. The thigh was fixed to the support table so that only the dynamics of shank-foot and flexion-extension knee movements were considered. This model was originally proposed in [5].Figure 2
Schematic representation of the patient knee joint plant [6].The positioning of the knee at a desired angleθ between shank and thigh in the sagittal plane is obtained by FES stimulation of the quadriceps muscles [5, 6]. The angle between the shank and the vertical axis in the sagittal plane is θv and the active torque produced by FES in the quadriceps is Ma [12].As in [2, 12], the system’s point of interest is θv0=30∘, and the operating point of the system is not the origin. Thus, according to the stability theory of Lyapunov, it is necessary to make a change of variables to transfer the new operation point to the origin. Thus, the state variables of (1) are given by the following:(i)
x1(t)=Δθv=θv-θv0, where θv is the angle between the shank and the vertical axis in the sagittal plane;(ii)
x2=x˙1, the knee joint angular velocity;(iii)
x3=ΔMa=Ma-Ma0, where Ma0 is the active torque (on quadriceps muscle of the paraplegic patient) in the operation point.The plant parameters with their meanings and values were obtained experimentally for the case of one patient in [5, 6] and they are shown in Table 1.Table 1
Parameter values obtained experimentally in [5, 6, 11] to the shank-foot complex of a paraplegic, 30-year-old patient.
Parameter
Value
Unit
J
Inertial moment of shank-foot complex
0.362
Kg⋅m2
m
Mass of shank-foot complex
4.37
Kg
l
Distance between knee and the center of the mass of shank-foot complex
23.8
cm
B
Viscous coefficient
0.27
N⋅m⋅s/rad
λ
Coefficient of exponential term
41.208
N⋅m/rad
E
Coefficient of exponential term
2.024
rad−1
ω
Resting elastic knee angle
2.918
rad
τ
Transfer function coefficient (time constant of the pole)
0.951
s
G
Transfer function coefficient (static gain)
42500
N⋅m/sThe movement of the knee joint resulting from the electrical stimulus applied to the quadriceps is represented by the nonlinear state equation (1), according to Gaino et al. in [2, 12]:(1)x˙1x˙2x˙3=010f~21x1-BJ1J00-1τx1x2x3+00GτPN.The nonlinearity of the mathematical model of the plant comes through the elementa21→f~21(x1(t)) of the characteristic matrix of the system [2, 6, 11, 12], which is given by(2)f~21x1t=1Jx1mglsinx1t+θv0-1Jx1×λexp-Ex1t+θv0+π2λexp-Ex1t+θv0+π2·x1t+θv0+π2-w+Ma0.As defined in [2, 6, 11, 12], at the operating point of interest, the following values for the variables are found: θv=θv0=30∘, and the derivatives θ˙v and θ¨v are null. In this case, the active torque of the knee, Ma0, produced by electrical stimulation, is given by (3)Ma0=mglsinθv0+λexp-Eθv0+π2θv0+π2-w.Considering the values of the parameters of Table1, taking g=9.8 (m/s2) and θv0=π/6, and substituting in (3) the value of Ma0=4.6068 (N·m) is obtained. In the case where θv0=π/3 (rad), Ma0=8.7653 (N·m).The new input of the system,PN, is defined from the system input, P, and is known as the pulse width unreferenced [2, 6, 11, 12]. It is given by(4)PN=P-Ma0G.Since there will only be movement of the paraplegic’s leg if an electrical stimulation pulse is applied to the skin of the thigh, that is,P>0, this implies that(5)PN>-Ma0G.


## 3. Robust Control Systems with Norm-Bounded Uncertainties

In this section the concept of control systems with norm-bounded uncertainties is presented and its methodology is used to design a control angle of the knee joint angle in paraplegic patients discussed in Section2.


### 3.1. Systems Control with Norm-Bounded Uncertainties

Let the plant be represented by(6)x˙=A+δAx+B+δBu,where the uncertainty matrices are given by(7)δA=LΔRA,δB=LΔRB,ΔΔT⪯I.The matrixΔ is the diagonal matrix of the uncertainties, containing the uncertain parameters normalized on the main diagonal, while the modulus of each is less than or equal to 1. The matrices RA and RB are algebraically determined, so that it suits expressions in (6) for δA and δB given in (7).Theorem1, that follows the ideas of [13], establishes a sufficient condition for the stability of system (6) in open loop, with the uncertain matrices given in (7) and u=0, in other words, null input.Theorem 1 (see [13]).
The plant (6) is stable for any matrices δA and δB defined in (7) if there exists a matrix X=XT and a real constant ϵ that satisfy the following conditions:(8)AX+XAT+ϵLLTXRATRAX-ϵI≺0,X≻0.Consider, now, the plant (6), with the matrices δA and δB given in (7) and the control law with states feedback:(9)u=-Kx.Thus, considering (6), (7), and the control law (9), the feedback system is defined by(10)x˙=A-BK+LΔRA-RBKx.Theorem2, that follows the ideas of [13], below corresponds to Theorem 1 but applies to the closed loop system and establishes a sufficient condition for the stability of the feedback system (10), with uncertain matrices given in (7) and input u=-Kx.Theorem 2 (see [13]).
System (10) is stable for any matrices δA and δB defined in (7) if there are matrices X=XT and W and a real constant ϵ which satisfies the following conditions:(11)AX+XAT-BW-WTBT+ϵLLTXRAT-WTRBTRAX-RBW-ϵI≺0,(12)X≻0.Based on the solution, the matrixK is given by K=WX-1.


### 3.2. Systems Control with Output Restriction

According to Boyd in [14, 15], stability analysis and control design problems are likely to be described by LMIs, allowing the introduction of other performance indices in the controller design, for example, the specification of the transient response by the decay rate and constraint specifications on the amplitude of control signals and outputs.A system that offers robust performance should be able to maintain its performance even in the presence of perturbations and disturbances, which are called uncertainties.Considering a known initial conditionx(0) and the LMIs (14), the output y(t)=Cx(t) can be subjected to the constraint (13), for all time t≥0:(13)maxyt2=maxyTtyt≤λ0.Then the asymptotic stability of system (6), with the output constraint (13), can be carried out by adding the LMIs (14) to (12), keeping X=XT≻0, as shown in [16, 17]. Consider(14)1x0Tx0X≥0,XXCTCXλ02I≥0.


### 3.3. Leg Position Control of the Paraplegic Patient

The control of the knee paraplegic patient’s position through functional electrical stimulation applied to the quadriceps muscle (see Section2) is described in [5, 7]. The state space equation is given by (6) with(15)A+δA=010f~21x1-BJ1J00-1τ,B+δB=00GτT.As described in Section2, the function f~21(x1(t)) is a nonlinearity of the system (see (2)) such that the range of parametric uncertainties is(16)f~21min≤f~21x1t≤f~21max.In (2) the x1 variable is at the denominator, and the analysis is more difficult when x1 is equal to zero. In order to solve this inconvenience, Gaino, in [2], analytically expanded (2) in Taylor series of fifth order. Studying the expanded equation, in a closed interval of interest, Gaino, in [2], found that the approximation error becomes practically zero. The values found by Gaino, considering the operation point θv0=30∘ and given the range of -π/6<θv<π/6, are f~21max=-21.7834 and f~21min=-36.0086.The nominal plant is represented by matricesA and B, given by(17)A=010f~0-BJ1J00-1τ,B=00GτT,where(18)f~0=f~21min+f~21max2.The matricesδA and δB, in (6), are decomposed according to (7):(19)L=0δfmax0T,RA=100,Δ=δ,RB=0,where -1≤δ≤1 and(20)δfmax=f~21max-f~21min2.


## 3.1. Systems Control with Norm-Bounded Uncertainties

Let the plant be represented by(6)x˙=A+δAx+B+δBu,where the uncertainty matrices are given by(7)δA=LΔRA,δB=LΔRB,ΔΔT⪯I.The matrixΔ is the diagonal matrix of the uncertainties, containing the uncertain parameters normalized on the main diagonal, while the modulus of each is less than or equal to 1. The matrices RA and RB are algebraically determined, so that it suits expressions in (6) for δA and δB given in (7).Theorem1, that follows the ideas of [13], establishes a sufficient condition for the stability of system (6) in open loop, with the uncertain matrices given in (7) and u=0, in other words, null input.Theorem 1 (see [13]).
The plant (6) is stable for any matrices δA and δB defined in (7) if there exists a matrix X=XT and a real constant ϵ that satisfy the following conditions:(8)AX+XAT+ϵLLTXRATRAX-ϵI≺0,X≻0.Consider, now, the plant (6), with the matrices δA and δB given in (7) and the control law with states feedback:(9)u=-Kx.Thus, considering (6), (7), and the control law (9), the feedback system is defined by(10)x˙=A-BK+LΔRA-RBKx.Theorem2, that follows the ideas of [13], below corresponds to Theorem 1 but applies to the closed loop system and establishes a sufficient condition for the stability of the feedback system (10), with uncertain matrices given in (7) and input u=-Kx.Theorem 2 (see [13]).
System (10) is stable for any matrices δA and δB defined in (7) if there are matrices X=XT and W and a real constant ϵ which satisfies the following conditions:(11)AX+XAT-BW-WTBT+ϵLLTXRAT-WTRBTRAX-RBW-ϵI≺0,(12)X≻0.Based on the solution, the matrixK is given by K=WX-1.


## 3.2. Systems Control with Output Restriction

According to Boyd in [14, 15], stability analysis and control design problems are likely to be described by LMIs, allowing the introduction of other performance indices in the controller design, for example, the specification of the transient response by the decay rate and constraint specifications on the amplitude of control signals and outputs.A system that offers robust performance should be able to maintain its performance even in the presence of perturbations and disturbances, which are called uncertainties.Considering a known initial conditionx(0) and the LMIs (14), the output y(t)=Cx(t) can be subjected to the constraint (13), for all time t≥0:(13)maxyt2=maxyTtyt≤λ0.Then the asymptotic stability of system (6), with the output constraint (13), can be carried out by adding the LMIs (14) to (12), keeping X=XT≻0, as shown in [16, 17]. Consider(14)1x0Tx0X≥0,XXCTCXλ02I≥0.


## 3.3. Leg Position Control of the Paraplegic Patient

The control of the knee paraplegic patient’s position through functional electrical stimulation applied to the quadriceps muscle (see Section2) is described in [5, 7]. The state space equation is given by (6) with(15)A+δA=010f~21x1-BJ1J00-1τ,B+δB=00GτT.As described in Section2, the function f~21(x1(t)) is a nonlinearity of the system (see (2)) such that the range of parametric uncertainties is(16)f~21min≤f~21x1t≤f~21max.In (2) the x1 variable is at the denominator, and the analysis is more difficult when x1 is equal to zero. In order to solve this inconvenience, Gaino, in [2], analytically expanded (2) in Taylor series of fifth order. Studying the expanded equation, in a closed interval of interest, Gaino, in [2], found that the approximation error becomes practically zero. The values found by Gaino, considering the operation point θv0=30∘ and given the range of -π/6<θv<π/6, are f~21max=-21.7834 and f~21min=-36.0086.The nominal plant is represented by matricesA and B, given by(17)A=010f~0-BJ1J00-1τ,B=00GτT,where(18)f~0=f~21min+f~21max2.The matricesδA and δB, in (6), are decomposed according to (7):(19)L=0δfmax0T,RA=100,Δ=δ,RB=0,where -1≤δ≤1 and(20)δfmax=f~21max-f~21min2.


## 4. Results

### 4.1. Results without considering Output Constraints

Considering the parameters defined in [5, 7] (see Table 1) for θ0=30∘ and -30∘≤x1≤30∘, it follows that(21)x0=-θv00-Ma0T=-0.52360-4.6068T,A=010-28.8960-0.74592.762400-1.0515,B=0044690T,L=07.11260T,C=100.Applying the LMIs (11) and (12), using thesoftware Matlab [18], for θ0=30∘, the state feedback matrix obtained was(22)K=-0.32440.09990.0605×10-3and the constant ϵ was(23)ϵ=12.7728.In Figure3, the outputs of dynamic equation’s simulations show that the graphics of the knee angles start at 0∘, corresponding to Δx1=θv0=π/6=-0.5236 (rad). The graphics of the angular velocity of the knee start up at 0 (rad/s). Finally, the graphics of the active torques produced by the stimuli are initiated at 0 (N·m) corresponding to Δx3=Ma0=4.6068 (see Section 2). Besides, the transient response of the dynamic compensator simulation applied to the dynamic of the paraplegic patient, with f21max=-21.7834, f21min=-36.0086, and the initial state is shown. Cases can be studied with other operation points, as shown in [2, 11], where a linearization result was considered for each operation point: π/4 (rad) and π/3 (rad).Figure 3
Simulation of the dynamic equation (10) of the paraplegic model for the operating point of 30∘, f21max=-21.7834 and f21min=-36.0086, for δ=0, δ=1, and δ=-1.The closed loop poles of system (10) are given in Table 2. In the first column of the table there are closed loop poles of the nominal system and in this case δ=0. In the other two columns of the table there are closed loop poles considering the extreme values of the f~21(x1), respectively, for δ=1 and δ=-1. In all table columns it is possible to verify that the real parts of the poles are negative, which means that they are positioned in the left upper half-plane of the s-plane.Table 2
Poles of closed loop (10) for   θ0=30°, for δ=0, δ=1, and δ=-1.
δ
=
0
δ
=
1
δ
=
-
1
-
1.3777
±
j
6.1086
-
1.6143
±
j
5.4951
-
1.2186
±
j
6.6799
-
1.7463
-
1.2732
-
2.0646In Figure3, the knee angle graphic for δ=0, the curve stabilizes at π/6=0.52 (rad) in a time of about 3.5 (s). The graphic of active torque produced by the electric stimulus shows that the curve stabilizes at the mark of 4.6 (N·m) at 3.1 (s). The graph of the angular velocity of the knee stabilizes in the mark of 0 (rad/s) at 3.2 (s). The pulse width graphic stabilizes in 1.07×10-4 at about 2.0 (s).


### 4.2. Results considering Output Constraints

In the second simulation, applying the LMIs (11), (12), and (14), with λ0=6.8018, using thesoftware Matlab [18], for θ0=30∘, the state feedback matrix obtained was(24)K=-0.26390.06020.0305×10-3and the constant ϵ was(25)ϵ=4.2263.The closed loop poles of the system are given in Table3. In the first column of the table there are the closed loop poles of the nominal system and in this case δ=0. In the other two columns of the table there are the closed loop poles considering the extreme values of the f~21(x1), respectively, for δ=1 and δ=-1. In all table columns it is possible to verify that the real parts of the poles are negative, which means that they are positioned in the left upper half-plane of the s-plane.Table 3
Poles of closed loop (10) for θ0=30°, λ0=6.8018, for δ=0, δ=1, and δ=-1.
δ
=
0
δ
=
1
δ
=
-
1
-
1.0627
±
j
5.8995
-
1.2390
±
j
5.2721
-
0.9457
±
j
6.4770
-
1.0343
-
0.6818
-
1.2681In Figure4, the knee angle graphic for δ=0, the curve stabilizes at π/6=0.52 (rad) in a time of about 4.0 (s). The graphic of active torque produced by the electric stimulus shows that the curve stabilizes at the mark of 4.6 (N·m) at 4.0 (s). The graph of the angular velocity of the knee stabilizes in the mark of 0 (rad/s) at 4.0 (s). The pulse width graphic stabilizes in 1.07×10-4 at about 2.7 (s).Figure 4
Simulation of the dynamic equation (10) of the paraplegic model for the operating point of 30∘, f21max=-21.7834 and f21min=-36.0086, using bounded output by the factor λ0=6.8018, for δ=0, δ=1, and δ=-1.In both designs, no decay rate was specified.Equation (5) shows that it is necessary that the pulse width satisfies PN>-Ma0/G. Actually, any value of PN greater than the ratio -Ma0/G satisfies the requirement. However, the previous relation implies that PN between -Ma0/G and Ma0/G satisfies the requirement (see Figure 4).


## 4.1. Results without considering Output Constraints

Considering the parameters defined in [5, 7] (see Table 1) for θ0=30∘ and -30∘≤x1≤30∘, it follows that(21)x0=-θv00-Ma0T=-0.52360-4.6068T,A=010-28.8960-0.74592.762400-1.0515,B=0044690T,L=07.11260T,C=100.Applying the LMIs (11) and (12), using thesoftware Matlab [18], for θ0=30∘, the state feedback matrix obtained was(22)K=-0.32440.09990.0605×10-3and the constant ϵ was(23)ϵ=12.7728.In Figure3, the outputs of dynamic equation’s simulations show that the graphics of the knee angles start at 0∘, corresponding to Δx1=θv0=π/6=-0.5236 (rad). The graphics of the angular velocity of the knee start up at 0 (rad/s). Finally, the graphics of the active torques produced by the stimuli are initiated at 0 (N·m) corresponding to Δx3=Ma0=4.6068 (see Section 2). Besides, the transient response of the dynamic compensator simulation applied to the dynamic of the paraplegic patient, with f21max=-21.7834, f21min=-36.0086, and the initial state is shown. Cases can be studied with other operation points, as shown in [2, 11], where a linearization result was considered for each operation point: π/4 (rad) and π/3 (rad).Figure 3
Simulation of the dynamic equation (10) of the paraplegic model for the operating point of 30∘, f21max=-21.7834 and f21min=-36.0086, for δ=0, δ=1, and δ=-1.The closed loop poles of system (10) are given in Table 2. In the first column of the table there are closed loop poles of the nominal system and in this case δ=0. In the other two columns of the table there are closed loop poles considering the extreme values of the f~21(x1), respectively, for δ=1 and δ=-1. In all table columns it is possible to verify that the real parts of the poles are negative, which means that they are positioned in the left upper half-plane of the s-plane.Table 2
Poles of closed loop (10) for   θ0=30°, for δ=0, δ=1, and δ=-1.
δ
=
0
δ
=
1
δ
=
-
1
-
1.3777
±
j
6.1086
-
1.6143
±
j
5.4951
-
1.2186
±
j
6.6799
-
1.7463
-
1.2732
-
2.0646In Figure3, the knee angle graphic for δ=0, the curve stabilizes at π/6=0.52 (rad) in a time of about 3.5 (s). The graphic of active torque produced by the electric stimulus shows that the curve stabilizes at the mark of 4.6 (N·m) at 3.1 (s). The graph of the angular velocity of the knee stabilizes in the mark of 0 (rad/s) at 3.2 (s). The pulse width graphic stabilizes in 1.07×10-4 at about 2.0 (s).


## 4.2. Results considering Output Constraints

In the second simulation, applying the LMIs (11), (12), and (14), with λ0=6.8018, using thesoftware Matlab [18], for θ0=30∘, the state feedback matrix obtained was(24)K=-0.26390.06020.0305×10-3and the constant ϵ was(25)ϵ=4.2263.The closed loop poles of the system are given in Table3. In the first column of the table there are the closed loop poles of the nominal system and in this case δ=0. In the other two columns of the table there are the closed loop poles considering the extreme values of the f~21(x1), respectively, for δ=1 and δ=-1. In all table columns it is possible to verify that the real parts of the poles are negative, which means that they are positioned in the left upper half-plane of the s-plane.Table 3
Poles of closed loop (10) for θ0=30°, λ0=6.8018, for δ=0, δ=1, and δ=-1.
δ
=
0
δ
=
1
δ
=
-
1
-
1.0627
±
j
5.8995
-
1.2390
±
j
5.2721
-
0.9457
±
j
6.4770
-
1.0343
-
0.6818
-
1.2681In Figure4, the knee angle graphic for δ=0, the curve stabilizes at π/6=0.52 (rad) in a time of about 4.0 (s). The graphic of active torque produced by the electric stimulus shows that the curve stabilizes at the mark of 4.6 (N·m) at 4.0 (s). The graph of the angular velocity of the knee stabilizes in the mark of 0 (rad/s) at 4.0 (s). The pulse width graphic stabilizes in 1.07×10-4 at about 2.7 (s).Figure 4
Simulation of the dynamic equation (10) of the paraplegic model for the operating point of 30∘, f21max=-21.7834 and f21min=-36.0086, using bounded output by the factor λ0=6.8018, for δ=0, δ=1, and δ=-1.In both designs, no decay rate was specified.Equation (5) shows that it is necessary that the pulse width satisfies PN>-Ma0/G. Actually, any value of PN greater than the ratio -Ma0/G satisfies the requirement. However, the previous relation implies that PN between -Ma0/G and Ma0/G satisfies the requirement (see Figure 4).


## 5. Discussions

As can be seen, the plant input is the functional electrical stimulation pulse applied on the quadriceps muscle. The plant output is the movement of the leg of the paraplegic patient until an angle allowed by the conditions of the patient. So the initial objective was achieved: a state feedback matrix,K, was obtained considering norm-bounded uncertainties, such that the system in question becomes stable. The designed controller is able to make the patient’s leg move from the rest to a desired angle and once the stimulation of the controller is removed, the leg goes back to the rest situation by gravity.It was proved that Theorem1 ensures stability for the open-loop system, while Theorem 2 ensures the asymptotic stability for the closed loop system. This fact can be confirmed by the analysis of Table 3 where it can be seen that the poles of the plant for different operating points have negative real parts, which means that they are positioned in the upper left half-plane of the s-plane.Along with the study of the stability, graphical results could have been generated to control the speed of transient response, specifying a decay rate. It allows a shorter time recovery, as shown in [2].As it is clear, a negative pulse width is impractical. Then restrictions must be imposed on input, as shown in Figure5, to prevent the pulse width from reaching zero or negative values. According to Gaino in [2] with an appropriate combination of the decay rate and the upper limiting value for the variation of pulse width one can achieve the increasing or the decreasing of the control law amplitude.Figure 5
Range restriction for the pulse width.The resulting simulation outputs shown in Figure4 are identical to that obtained by Gaino in [2] in the same conditions. Here the simulation results were obtained using a restriction imposed on the output by a factor λ0=6.8018, as it can be verified in Table 3. As a consequence, the oscillation was eliminated from the pulse width curve, stabilizing in values of PN very close to one another in both simulations.As mentioned by Sanches et al. in [8] “An electric current with a balanced, biphasic, rectangular waveform with a pulse width of 220 μs was applied to the skin surface of the volunteer. The signal amplitude was then held constant for 3 seconds and considered a “step pattern” [5]. The pulse amplitude was adjusted to obtain an incomplete knee extension, reaching a maximum angle of 70∘ with respect to the initial rest position. The frequency of the signal was 50 Hz [5]. For healthy persons, currents with amplitudes in the range of 60–80 mA are usually used, but in paraplegic patients, currents can reach 120 mA.” As mentioned by Ferrarin and Pedotti in [5], “In this way the presence of nonlinearity due to the muscle recruitment threshold and knee joint end stop could be excluded.” It is less dangerous to apply step patterns than sinusoidal wave forms.


## 6. Conclusions

The initial objective was achieved since a state feedback matrix,K, considering norm-bounded uncertainties, was obtained such that the system in question became stable. The designed controller is able to make the patient’s leg move from the rest to a desired angle and once the stimulation is removed, the leg goes back to the rest situation by gravity.It was proved that Theorem1 ensures stability for the open-loop system, while Theorem 2 ensures the asymptotic stability for the closed loop system. The simulations of Section 4 show that the curves for the cases where δ=0 are situated between the curves corresponding to the extremes values of δ, that is, δ=1 and δ=-1, as it was expected. Table 3 shows that, for all values of δ, the real parts of the poles are negative, and this indicates that the controller designed is able to maintain the stability of the plant.



---

*Source: 736246-2015-08-26.xml*