# Characteristics of Atmospheric Compositions in the Background Area of Yangtze River Delta during Heavy Air Pollution Episode

Authors: Hong-Hui Xu; Jing-Jiao Pu; Jun He; Jie Liu; Bing Qi; Rong-Guang Du
Journal: Advances in Meteorology
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

In order to understand the formation and evolution of recurrent severe haze pollution episodes in Yangtze River Delta, China, a short comparative sampling campaign was conducted at the Lin’an background monitoring station from 25 November 2013 to 14 December 2013. The characteristic concentrations of PM2.5, black carbon, CO2, CO, and CH4 have been systematically recorded at the abovementioned site. Coupled with detailed analysis of air backward trajectories, fire spot distribution surrounding the studied site and meteorological impacts, temporal trend, diurnal variation, and intercorrelation of the aforementioned species have also been comprehensively investigated throughout prehaze, haze, and posthaze periods.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Due to the fast industrialization in China, severe haze pollution episodes have occurred more frequently in the past few years, especially in Yangtze River Delta [1–4], Pearl River Delta [5–7], and North China Plain [8–10], and they have attracted more and more concern because they not only reduce atmospheric visibility but also pose great health threats to human beings [11–14]. A number of studies have been conducted to investigate the formation of haze and characteristics of the ambient aerosols worldwide. The previous researches found out that the formation of secondary aerosol was one of the important mechanisms of haze occurrence, and meteorological factors including stagnant atmospheric condition, weak surface wind speed, and strong temperature inversion in the planetary boundary layer (PBL) allowing pollutants to accumulate in a shallow layer were another main contributor to haze episodes [3, 10, 15]. The water soluble components in the airborne particles could be used to explore the key causes of haze formation in urban areas [1, 8, 16]. In Yangtze River Delta (YRD), many researches have been carried out on the correlation between aerosol plus gas concentrations (e.g., PM2.5, SO2, N
O
x, CO, and O3) and other chemical composition of these fine aerosols in order to better understand the formation mechanism of haze aerosols [2–4, 17]. Fu et al. [2] reported that much higher concentration of secondary aerosol particles was observed on the heavily polluted day and the unusual stagnant dispersion condition played a predominant role in causing such a severe pollution. Huang et al. [17] studied several extreme low visibility periods by a synergy of ground-based monitoring and satellite and lidar observations and identified three typical haze types in Shanghai, that is, secondary inorganic pollution, dust, and biomass burning. Kang et al. [3] found that large-scale stagnation occurred in a long-lasting haze episode in Nanjing and high ratio of N
O
3
-/S
O
4
2
- indicated that traffic emission could be one of the main sources in the YRD region.It is known that the mass concentration ratios of various atmospheric pollutants measured at the same site could indicate their different origins such as anthropogenic and biogenic sources [18–21]. BC is amorphous carbon produced by incomplete combustion of carbonaceous materials, mainly from vehicle emissions, industrial combustion, residential burning, biomass burning, power plants, and so forth [22]. CO2 and CH4 are two types of important greenhouse gases. CO2 primarily derives from fossil fuel combustion, cement production, and land use change, while CH4 mainly comes from ruminant animals, wetlands, rice paddies, energy production, landfills, biomass burning, and biogenic sources [23]. CO is an indirect greenhouse gas, which comes from vehicle exhaust and other incomplete combustion processes [24]. The correlations of concentrations of BC, CO2, and CO showed that ΔCO/ΔCO2 (regression slope of CO/CO2) could present combustion efficiency of emission sources and the chief source might be identified based on the specific CO/CO2 emission ratio of different emission sources [25, 26]. Besides, ΔBC/ΔCO could also be affected by fuel composition and the types of combustion [27–30]; for instance, the BC/CO emission ratio became higher from those more carbon contained fuel when the combustion condition remained the same as the larger BC fraction in PM2.5 could be produced [31] and the emission intensity of BC and CO would differ significantly under flaming or smoldering condition for the same fuel (e.g., vegetation fire) [32]. Moreover, ΔBC/ΔCO could imply the possible loss of BC during atmospheric transport as BC is easier to be removed by dry or wet deposition, especially in the marine boundary layer [19, 33, 34]. Atmospheric measurements of carbonaceous aerosols in China in recent years have provided useful information about their characteristics and relevant processes responsible for their variability and contribution to haze formation [35–38]. However, most of the reports focused on urban areas and might not be representative sufficiently of regional conditions. In addition, very few studies in China have attempted to evaluate the particulate and carbonaceous aerosols measured simultaneously with other relevant trace gaseous species during heavy aerosol pollution events especially in YRD region.Therefore, in this study, Global Atmospheric Watch (GAW) station of Lin’an regional background site has been chosen for a short yet comparative sampling campaign between nonhaze and haze episodes from late Nov. 2013 to early Dec. 2013. This location is in the suburb of Lin’an City, typical of nonurban environment in YRD, and the comparative sampling on this site was deemed beneficial to understanding more of regional characteristics of such aerosols during both nonhaze and severe haze pollution episodes. According to the air quality index (AQI) released by the Environmental Protection Bureau (EPB) of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou experienced mild haze on 1 Dec., moderate haze on 2~3 Dec., and severe haze from 4 to 9 Dec., and the haze degraded back to mild on 10~11 Dec. During this haze episode, the hourly mean concentration of PM2.5 reached up to 394 μg m−3 in Hangzhou, which was the highest value in 2013. Compared with another polluted event which occurred in Jan. 2013, this haze event persisted longer and appeared to be much more severe [39]. In this report, the characteristic concentrations of PM2.5, BC, CO2, CO, and CH4 have been systematically measuredin situ. Coupled with detailed analysis of air backward trajectories, fire spot distribution surrounding the studied site and meteorological impacts, temporal trend, diurnal variation, and intercorrelation of the abovementioned species have also been comprehensively investigated throughout prehaze, haze, and posthaze periods, which could shed light on the evolution of these species and their important roles in the formation of such a severe haze episode in this regional background area.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Sampling

The sampling site is located at the WMO Lin’an Regional Atmospheric Background Station (119°44′E, 30°18′N, 138.6 masl), which is in the southern part of Yangtze River Delta, about 60 km away to the west of Hangzhou and about 150 km away to the southwest of Shanghai. The station is surrounded by hilly lands, forest, and farming areas, with heavy vegetation coverage. There is no large village around within 3 km. The prevailing wind direction is northeast and southwest. Special weather phenomenon rarely occurs and the frequency of thermal inversion is low, with distinct meteorological characteristics of subtropical monsoon climate and atmospheric circulation.The equipment forin situ observation of PM2.5 was TEOM 1405-D (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The sampling flow rate was 3 L min−1, and the time interval of measurement was 5 minutes. This monitor takes a direct mass measurement of particulates using a tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) to measure the mass change of sample filters onto which particles impinge. The observation instrument of BC was Aethalometer AE-31 (American Magee Scientific). There are seven wavelengths that could be used for observations, 370 nm, 470 nm, 520 nm, 590 nm, 660 nm, 880 nm, and 950 nm, respectively. The sampling flow rate was 5 L min−1 with 2.5 μm impactor in the air inlet and the time interval was 5 minutes. The instrument aspirates ambient air using its inlet tube and black carbon mass concentration is estimated by measuring the change in the transmittance of a quartz filter tape with and without particles collected. These data are automatically recorded in the flash card of the instrument and displayed on the screen. The data analyzed here was observed from the 880 nm channel [40]. CO2 and CH4 concentrations were measured by CO2/CH4 analyzer (Picarro G1301), while CO concentration was measured by CO2/CO analyzer (Picarro G1302). The measuring technique is based on cavity ring-down spectroscopy. The device comprises three main parts: a laser, a high finesse optical cavity with two or more mirrors, and a photodetector. The laser light is injected into the cavity through one partially reflecting mirror. This light builds up over time in the cavity and is monitored by a photodetector through a second partially reflecting mirror. After the laser is rapidly turned off, most of the light remains trapped in the cavity, and the decaying light intensity due to cavity mirror loss as well as sample absorption and scattering is measured. The limit of detection of CO2, CH4, and CO measured with this technique is lower than 0.05 ppm, 0.7 ppb, and 5 ppb per 5 min, respectively; the value of maximum drift peak reaches 0.5 ppm, 3 ppb, and 50 ppb per month, respectively. The time interval of measurement is 4 seconds. The more detailed descriptions of the whole analytical system can be found in Fang et al. [41, 42]. The above five colocated measurements were conducted simultaneously from 25 Nov. to 14 Dec. 2013.The hourly meteorological data, including visibility, relative humidity, and surface wind speed, was collected from the meteorological observation devices deployed within Lin’an station. Wind speed was observed at 10 m above the ground and relative humidity was collected at 1.5 m above the ground. Visibility was monitored by FD12 forward scatter visibility meter (Vaisala Corporation, Finland).


### 2.2. Quality Control

For the PM2.5 and BC measurements, the calibration of the flow rate was done biweekly at normal condition. However, when it became noisy during continuous operation, the flow rate was calibrated accordingly and the outliers were excluded from analysis.For the CO2, CH4, and CO measurements, the calibration of the observation system was conducted regularly every 12 hours by measuring a set of standard working gases which are traceable to WMO/GAW standard gas of level one, and concentrations were corrected slightly from these calibrations [41, 42]. In addition, the outliers were also excluded according to the equipment performance log when there were instrument troubles or anthropogenic influences, such as instrument maintenance or on-site visit.Routine maintenance for the meteorological instruments was carried out regularly so that the quality of observations would not deteriorate significantly. Routine quality control checks were also conducted to detect the equipment faults.


## 2.1. Sampling

The sampling site is located at the WMO Lin’an Regional Atmospheric Background Station (119°44′E, 30°18′N, 138.6 masl), which is in the southern part of Yangtze River Delta, about 60 km away to the west of Hangzhou and about 150 km away to the southwest of Shanghai. The station is surrounded by hilly lands, forest, and farming areas, with heavy vegetation coverage. There is no large village around within 3 km. The prevailing wind direction is northeast and southwest. Special weather phenomenon rarely occurs and the frequency of thermal inversion is low, with distinct meteorological characteristics of subtropical monsoon climate and atmospheric circulation.The equipment forin situ observation of PM2.5 was TEOM 1405-D (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The sampling flow rate was 3 L min−1, and the time interval of measurement was 5 minutes. This monitor takes a direct mass measurement of particulates using a tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) to measure the mass change of sample filters onto which particles impinge. The observation instrument of BC was Aethalometer AE-31 (American Magee Scientific). There are seven wavelengths that could be used for observations, 370 nm, 470 nm, 520 nm, 590 nm, 660 nm, 880 nm, and 950 nm, respectively. The sampling flow rate was 5 L min−1 with 2.5 μm impactor in the air inlet and the time interval was 5 minutes. The instrument aspirates ambient air using its inlet tube and black carbon mass concentration is estimated by measuring the change in the transmittance of a quartz filter tape with and without particles collected. These data are automatically recorded in the flash card of the instrument and displayed on the screen. The data analyzed here was observed from the 880 nm channel [40]. CO2 and CH4 concentrations were measured by CO2/CH4 analyzer (Picarro G1301), while CO concentration was measured by CO2/CO analyzer (Picarro G1302). The measuring technique is based on cavity ring-down spectroscopy. The device comprises three main parts: a laser, a high finesse optical cavity with two or more mirrors, and a photodetector. The laser light is injected into the cavity through one partially reflecting mirror. This light builds up over time in the cavity and is monitored by a photodetector through a second partially reflecting mirror. After the laser is rapidly turned off, most of the light remains trapped in the cavity, and the decaying light intensity due to cavity mirror loss as well as sample absorption and scattering is measured. The limit of detection of CO2, CH4, and CO measured with this technique is lower than 0.05 ppm, 0.7 ppb, and 5 ppb per 5 min, respectively; the value of maximum drift peak reaches 0.5 ppm, 3 ppb, and 50 ppb per month, respectively. The time interval of measurement is 4 seconds. The more detailed descriptions of the whole analytical system can be found in Fang et al. [41, 42]. The above five colocated measurements were conducted simultaneously from 25 Nov. to 14 Dec. 2013.The hourly meteorological data, including visibility, relative humidity, and surface wind speed, was collected from the meteorological observation devices deployed within Lin’an station. Wind speed was observed at 10 m above the ground and relative humidity was collected at 1.5 m above the ground. Visibility was monitored by FD12 forward scatter visibility meter (Vaisala Corporation, Finland).


## 2.2. Quality Control

For the PM2.5 and BC measurements, the calibration of the flow rate was done biweekly at normal condition. However, when it became noisy during continuous operation, the flow rate was calibrated accordingly and the outliers were excluded from analysis.For the CO2, CH4, and CO measurements, the calibration of the observation system was conducted regularly every 12 hours by measuring a set of standard working gases which are traceable to WMO/GAW standard gas of level one, and concentrations were corrected slightly from these calibrations [41, 42]. In addition, the outliers were also excluded according to the equipment performance log when there were instrument troubles or anthropogenic influences, such as instrument maintenance or on-site visit.Routine maintenance for the meteorological instruments was carried out regularly so that the quality of observations would not deteriorate significantly. Routine quality control checks were also conducted to detect the equipment faults.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Air Mass backward Trajectory Analysis

Figure1 illustrated the active fire locations monitored by MODIS instrument on Satellite Terra (transit time in the day is around 10:30 local time) and Aqua (transit time in the day is around 13:30 local time) of USA NASA [43], and the 96 hr air mass backward trajectories of Lin’an station with an interval of 3 hours at 500 m (agl) from 25 Nov. to 15 Dec. were calculated by Hysplit 4.9 model from NOAA (Draxler and Rolph). The input meteorological data of trajectory model was from Global Data Assimilation System (GADS) of NOAA. The statistically mean trajectories with their relative percentage shown have been adopted to represent the pathways of each cluster for a more concise presentation by merging through the Euclidean calculation.Figure 1
Active fire locations and 96 hr air mass backward trajectories of Lin’an station. (a) Prehaze period (25~30 Nov. 2013), (b) haze period (4~9 Dec. 2013), and (c) posthaze period (10~14 Dec. 2013).
(a)
(b)
(c)During the prehaze period (25–30 Nov. 2013), the air mass over the sampling site mainly originated from the northwest sector, 41.7% of the 96 h backward trajectories passing through Inner Mongolia, Shanxi, Henan, and Anhui provinces to Lin’an, with the rest 58.3% trajectories coming through Gansu, Ningxia, Shanxi, Henan, and Anhui before reaching the studied site. During this period, trajectories were observed to pass through the north China plain with heavy industries but fewer fire spots distributed in the northwest sector (Figure2). During the haze period (4–9 Dec. 2013), the 96 h backward trajectories transported much shorter distance, indicating more stagnant meteorological condition in the surrounding area of the receptor site, 57.5% coming from Henan passing through Anhui and reaching Lin’an and another 42.5% circling over Jiangxi and Zhejiang provinces in the southwest sector, where the daily average number of fire spots increased dramatically (Figure 2), indicating much stronger biomass burning contribution to the air mass over the receptor site through short-range transport. In the posthaze period (10–14 Dec. 2013), the majority of air masses originated from the northwest sector, while the density of fire spot surrounding the sampling site had decreased significantly.Figure 2
Daily numbers of fire spots in different sectors: northwest sector: 100°E–119.733°E, 30.3°N–48°N; southwest sector: 100°E–119.733°E, 22°N–30.3°N; northeast sector: 119.733°E–130°E, 30.3°N–48°N; and southeast sector: 119.733°E–130°E, 22°N–30.3°N.Apparently, based on both air mass backward trajectory and fire spot distribution, it could be inferred that the air quality in the studied site had been affected by the air parcels coming from biomass burning regions via the short- and medium-range transport particularly during the haze episode in addition to the regular industrial activities and traffic emissions.


### 3.2. Temporal Trends of PM2.5 and BC

Figure3 shows the hourly mean mass concentration of PM2.5 at Lin’an regional background station from 25 Nov. to 14 Dec. 2013. Before 1 Dec. 2013, the average PM2.5 concentration was 30.4 ± 10.0 μg m−3, lower than 75 μg m−3, which is the daily average healthy threshold for residential area and countryside defined in the latest China’s National Air Quality Standard (GB3095-2012). After that the PM2.5 level started to increase, stayed above 75 μg m−3 from 15:00 on 3 Dec. to 15:00 on 9 Dec., and exceeded 250 μg m−3 at the periods of 16:00–21:00 on 6 Dec., 11:00–22:00 on 7 Dec., and 16:00–18:00 on 8 Dec. It was clearly showing that a severe haze pollution event hit the sampling site during 4~9 Dec. 2013 strongly with PM2.5 of 162.5 ± 66.6 μg m−3, and the air quality in terms of particulate level deteriorated most from 6 to 8 Dec. 2013 with PM2.5 of 203.3 ± 71.0 μg m−3. The particle concentration trend was consistent with the AQI published by Zhejiang Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau (http://www.zjepb.gov.cn/hbtmhwz/index.htm), for which PM2.5 was also categorized as the primary pollutant during this study period.Figure 3
Hourly mean mass concentration of PM2.5 and mass proportion of PM2.5 in PM10 at Lin’an regional background station.It can also be seen from Figure3 that the mass ratio of PM2.5 in PM10 (PM2.5/PM10) at Lin’an background station started to rise from 1 Dec. 2013 with the average ratio of 63.6 ± 5.6% during 1~3 Dec. 2013. Afterwards, the mean ratio of PM2.5/PM10 kept on increasing and reached 70.7 ± 5.6% during severely polluted period of 4~9 Dec. 2013, which was nearly close to the value observed in Shanghai during another large-scale haze pollution episode that happened in YRD in January 2013 [39]. During the prehaze (25~30 Nov. 2013) and posthaze (10~14 Dec. 2013) periods, the mean ratios of PM2.5/PM10 were 42.7 ± 11.2% and 56.1 ± 6.7%, respectively. This trend demonstrated that more PM2.5 had been formed and contributed to the inhalable particulate matter during the heavy haze period from 1 to 9 Dec. 2013 in terms of both mass concentration and mass ratio of PM2.5/PM10, which might explain that much stronger secondary aerosol formation and accumulation could occur including secondary organic and inorganic aerosols during such a haze pollution event in this studied region [44].Figure4 presented the scatter distribution of hourly mean concentrations of BC and PM2.5 at Lin’an background station during three periods: prehaze period (25~30 Nov. 2013), haze period (4~9 Dec. 2013), and posthaze period (10~14 Dec. 2013). The temporal concentration trends of both BC and PM2.5 seemed very consistent, and the square of correlation coefficient of concentrations of BC and PM2.5 was up to 0.58 (prehaze period), 0.79 (haze period), and 0.86 (posthaze period), respectively, with 99% confidence interval. As for the fact that it is well known that BC is essentially a primary pollutant emitted from various combustion processes, the high correlation coefficient of concentrations of BC and PM2.5 during haze period indirectly confirmed that BC was emitted from the similar sources to those precursors which contributed largely to the formation of PM2.5 in this region. The mass ratio of BC in PM2.5 accounted for 8.03 ± 2.46%, 6.99 ± 0.91%, and 8.95 ± 1.40% in prehaze, haze, and posthaze periods, respectively. It can be clearly seen that the mass proportion of BC in PM2.5 was lower during haze period, which was also observed in other cities of China, such as Shanghai and Guangzhou, where the significant increase of secondary species caused the haze days [6, 39].Figure 4
Scatter distribution of hourly mean concentrations of BC and PM2.5 at Lin’an background station: (a) prehaze period, (b) haze period, and (c) posthaze period.
(a)
(b)
(c)


### 3.3. Temporal Trends of CO2, CO, and CH4

Both CO2 and CO are directly and indirectly related with the emission from combustion of fossil fuels (oil, natural gas, and coal), solid waste, biomass (e.g., wood products) and with various industrial processes (e.g., cement kilns); CH4 is mainly released through agricultural practices including livestock, biomass burning, and the decay of landfill wastes, though it could also be emitted during the production and transport of fossil fuels (e.g., natural gas).Figure5 describes the hourly mean concentrations of CO2, CO, and CH4 at Lin’an background station from 25 Nov. to 14 Dec. 2013. Before 1 Dec., the occurrence levels of CO2, CO, and CH4 maintained their concentrations below 420.7 ppm, 0.54 ppm, and 2.00 ppm, respectively. From 1 Dec. to 3 Dec., they started to increase gradually and reached the peak of 429.6 ppm (CO2), 0.82 ppm (CO), and 2.07 ppm (CH4), respectively. During the period of 4~9 Dec., concentrations of these pollutants jumped noticeably, especially from 16:00 on 6 Dec. to 10:00 on 8 Dec., with the peak values of 494.2 ppm (CO2), 2.18 ppm (CO), and 2.45 ppm (CH4), respectively. The occurrence levels of these three pollutants decreased to 427.8 ± 9.6 ppm (CO2), 0.78 ± 0.19 ppm (CO), and 2.07 ± 0.06 ppm (CH4) during the posthaze period of 10~14 Dec., though the haze had not degraded completely. This occurrence trend was generally consistent with that of PM2.5 and BC mentioned above. The spikes and trends of these three atmospheric gases during this sampling period could be attributed to the following factors: (1) besides the regular industrial activities, the fire spots in surrounding region may have some effect especially during the haze period when the emission intensity could be strengthened, which was verified by the analysis in Section 3.1; (2) stagnant atmospheric condition would contribute to the stronger accumulation of these pollutants, for which more details could be found in Section 3.4.Figure 5
Hourly mean concentrations of CO2, CO, and CH4 at Lin’an background station.


### 3.4. Meteorological Effects on Temporal Trends of Concerned Pollutants

During the sampling period from 25 Nov. to 14 Dec., no precipitation was observed at Lin’an station, and relative humidity (RH) was lower than 80% at most of the time. The result in Figure6 had shown a very clear temporal trend that the visibility was mostly more than 10 km during the prehaze period, dropped down to less than 5 km during the strong haze episode, and improved to some extent from 11 Dec. 2013. It needs to be pointed out that fog occurred during two periods of 21:00 on 6 Dec.~11:00 on 7 Dec. and 22:00 on 7 Dec.~9:00 on 8 Dec. when RH exceeded 80% and visibility fell down below 1 km (Figure 6). The visibility reduction could be attributed to the light extinction by both water vapor and haze aerosols during the above two slots. However, due to the wet scavenging of particles by fog droplets, PM2.5 concentration dropped evidently in these two durations, while the concentrations of CO2, CO, and CH4 presented much less decrements (Figures 3 and 5). Given that all the simultaneous measurements of these pollutants were conducted at the same site, the fog droplet size distribution could be considered the same during the entire fog deposition process; the discrepancy between concentration reductions of particle and the other three gases might be because the particle wet scavenging efficiency would be much more dominant than that of CO2, CO, and CH4 as the latter is generally affected by gas dissolution and surface adsorption [45, 46].Figure 6
Hourly visibility, relative humidity, surface wind speed, and wind direction at Lin’an station.Similar to those reported in previous studies [2, 10, 15, 17], weak surface wind speed was also observed at Lin’an station during this strong haze event. The average wind speed was 1.57 ± 0.84 m s−1 from 00:00 on 4 Dec. to 08:00 on 9 Dec., it was lower than 2.10 ± 1.25 m s−1 in prehaze period from 00:00 on 25 Nov. to 23:00 on 30 Nov., and it remained at the level of 1.48 ± 0.87 m s−1 in posthaze period from 00:00 on 10 Dec. to 23:00 on 14 Dec. (Figure 6). A weak surface high-pressure system persisted in YRD from 4 to 6 Dec. 2013 (Figure 7), and, at 08:00 in the morning, thermal inversion was observed under 200 masl (Figure 8), so that the weather condition was disadvantageous for dispersion. On 7 Dec., surface high-pressure system became weaker, and on 8 Dec. saddle ground pressure field controlled this region; thermal inversion occurred between 200 and 800 masl, so the dispersion condition remained poor. From 08:00 on 9 Dec. a strong Mongolia anticyclone came over; thus the surface wind speed increased significantly and the thermal inversion disappeared, which were deemed to benefit the dispersion and circulation of atmospheric pollutants so that their occurrence levels dropped considerably as shown in Figures 3 and 5.Figure 7
Surface weather patterns over eastern Asia at 08:00 (local time) on 6, 7, 8, and 9 Dec. 2013 (fromhttp://web.kma.go.kr/).Figure 8
Temperature soundings at Hangzhou station at 08:00 (local time) on 4~9 Dec. 2013 (fromhttp://weather.uwyo.edu/upperair/sounding.html).


### 3.5. Diurnal Variation of CO2, CO, CH4, BC, and PM2.5

Figure9 demonstrated the diurnal variation of concentrations of CO2, CO, CH4, BC, and PM2.5 between prehaze (25~30 Nov. 2013) and strong haze (4~9 Dec. 2013) periods. In prehaze period, the diurnal variations of CO2, BC, and PM2.5 seemed to be significant with the diurnal amplitudes of 10.4 ppm (CO2), 2.4 μg m−3 (BC), and 17.7 μg m−3 (PM2.5), respectively, while the diurnal amplitudes of CO and CH4 were only 0.10 ppm and 0.036 ppm, respectively, though the diurnal variations were still slightly observable. The diurnal distribution of CO2 concentration showed a single-peak pattern with the peak value occurring at 8:00; CH4 concentration exhibited double peaks at 9:00 and 22:00; BC and PM2.5 concentrations presented three peaks appearing at 9:00, 18:00, and 23:00. The diurnal CO2 distribution in prehaze period was similar to the observations during winter season at this station in 2009~2011 [42] which indicated that the diurnal CO2 variation was affected predominantly by meteorological dispersion conditions and sources/sinks [42, 47]. Due to the active photosynthetic/respiration fluxes in all seasons at Lin’an station, the minimum concentration appeared in the afternoon when the diffusion condition was more favorable and the photosynthetic CO2 uptake was strong, while the higher concentration appeared at dawn when the boundary layer became stable and the respiration was strong. The diurnal variations of CH4, BC, and PM2.5 were also consistent with the diurnal cycle of the boundary layer which led to a peak in the morning and a minimum value in the afternoon. Moreover, due to the anthropogenic sources, especially from the vehicular emission at the morning and evening rush hours, the concentrations of CO, BC, and PM2.5 presented dual peaks at 9:00 and 18:00, respectively, which was similar to that observed at other locations [4, 48]. CH4 had not shown that peak in the afternoon possibly because of the photochemical reaction induced by O
H
∙ [41]. At 22:00~23:00, the concentrations of CH4, CO, BC, and PM2.5 presented another peak, which might be ascribed to high accumulation rates at nighttime [49]; after that, due to the decrease of anthropogenic emissions, the concentrations declined until early morning, though the mixing height and wind speed remained constant and low [50].Figure 9
Diurnal concentration variations of CO2, CO, CH4, BC, and PM2.5 at Lin’an regional background station.During strong haze period, more significant diurnal variations were observed. The concentrations of all these five pollutants jumped dramatically during each hour of the day, and the diurnal amplitude rose up to 16.4 ppm (CO2), 0.33 ppm (CO), 0.086 ppm (CH4), 6.9 μg m−3 (BC), and 106.6 μg m−3 (PM2.5), respectively. The diurnal distributions of these pollutants displayed a trimodal pattern, reaching the peak value at 9:00~10:00, 17:00~18:00, and 21:00~22:00, respectively, with the maximum value occurring at 17:00~18:00 and the minimum value occurring at 5:00~6:00, except for CO2 whose minimum value still occurred at 15:00. It is understandable that CO2 concentration reached the minimum in the afternoon which was the same as in the prehaze period due to the stronger photosynthesis uptake during that time. For CO, CH4, BC, and PM2.5, the minimum concentrations occurred in the early morning, which could be explained by the fact that the emission intensity of these pollutants could be much lesser during the late nighttime. It was also clear that the occurrence levels of these four pollutants had been increased considerably from early morning to midnight. This trend could be also attributed to stronger industrial activities, traffic emission, and lesser favorable dispersion conditions. In addition, it could not be ignored that the regional short- and medium-range transport had contributed to the peaking of these four pollutants in the afternoon.


### 3.6. Correlation of CO2, CO, CH4, and BC

Table1 exhibited the correlation coefficient of concentrations of BC, CO, CO2, and CH4. It was manifestly seen that the correlation coefficient in haze period was significantly higher than that in prehaze period, which was also observed at Mt. Fuji, Japan, during smoke event [19]. The concentrations of BC, CO, CO2, and CH4 seemed to experience a more similar evolution in haze period. ΔCO/ΔCO2 (slope of hourly mean concentrations of CO and CO2) and ΔCH4/ΔCO2 in haze period were higher than those in prehaze period. Generally, higher ΔCO/ΔCO2 indicated relatively lower combustion efficiency and it is also known that the combustion efficiency of biomass burning is normally lower than that of fossil fuel as biomass burning is more of smoldering fires [25]. In addition, modified combustion efficiency (MCE, defined as ΔCO2/ΔCO + ΔCO2) has been adopted and it shows that MCE in haze episode (0.979) was also lower than that in prehaze period (0.985). Streets et al. [51] had reported the emission ratio of CH4/CO2 derived from the emission inventory compiled in 2000 was 1.80 (Gg/Tg) from biomass burning, higher than 1.38 (Gg/Tg) from fossil fuel combustion in YRD. The ΔBC/ΔCO ratio in prehaze period was 0.0075 μg m−3/μg m−3, close to the value of 0.008 μg m−3/μg m−3 in northern China in 2005 [52], while in haze period the ratio dropped to 0.0058 μg m−3/μg m−3. Smoldering biomass burning in YRD region is known to be dominant. During the haze period, significantly additional CO and BC could be emitted due to the incomplete biomass burning, while more BC might have been removed via wet scavenging process by fog droplets through the internal mixture with water soluble species when the air masses had been long transported [19], leading to lower ΔBC/ΔCO ratio in the haze episode. Consistent with the findings from air mass backward trajectory analysis, ΔCO/ΔCO2, ΔCH4/ΔCO2, and ΔBC/ΔCO all therefore implied that the biomass burning in this region had contributed more to the formation of haze occurring during 4–9 Dec. 2013.Table 1
Correlation coefficient (CC) of concentrations of BC, CO, CO2, and CH4 and the ratio of ΔBC/ΔCO, ΔCO/ΔCO2, and ΔCH4/ΔCO2 at Lin’an station.
Prehaze period
Haze period
CC between BC and CO#
0.5346
0.7534
CC between CO andC
O
2
#
0.7922
0.9599
CC between CH4 and C
O
2
#
0.5769
0.9460
ΔBC/ΔCO (μg m−3/μg m−3)
0.0075
0.0058
ΔCO/ΔCO2 (ppm/ppm)
0.0150
0.0217
ΔCH4/ΔCO2 (ppm/ppm)
0.0022
0.0054
P
#
<
0.0001.


## 3.1. Air Mass backward Trajectory Analysis

Figure1 illustrated the active fire locations monitored by MODIS instrument on Satellite Terra (transit time in the day is around 10:30 local time) and Aqua (transit time in the day is around 13:30 local time) of USA NASA [43], and the 96 hr air mass backward trajectories of Lin’an station with an interval of 3 hours at 500 m (agl) from 25 Nov. to 15 Dec. were calculated by Hysplit 4.9 model from NOAA (Draxler and Rolph). The input meteorological data of trajectory model was from Global Data Assimilation System (GADS) of NOAA. The statistically mean trajectories with their relative percentage shown have been adopted to represent the pathways of each cluster for a more concise presentation by merging through the Euclidean calculation.Figure 1
Active fire locations and 96 hr air mass backward trajectories of Lin’an station. (a) Prehaze period (25~30 Nov. 2013), (b) haze period (4~9 Dec. 2013), and (c) posthaze period (10~14 Dec. 2013).
(a)
(b)
(c)During the prehaze period (25–30 Nov. 2013), the air mass over the sampling site mainly originated from the northwest sector, 41.7% of the 96 h backward trajectories passing through Inner Mongolia, Shanxi, Henan, and Anhui provinces to Lin’an, with the rest 58.3% trajectories coming through Gansu, Ningxia, Shanxi, Henan, and Anhui before reaching the studied site. During this period, trajectories were observed to pass through the north China plain with heavy industries but fewer fire spots distributed in the northwest sector (Figure2). During the haze period (4–9 Dec. 2013), the 96 h backward trajectories transported much shorter distance, indicating more stagnant meteorological condition in the surrounding area of the receptor site, 57.5% coming from Henan passing through Anhui and reaching Lin’an and another 42.5% circling over Jiangxi and Zhejiang provinces in the southwest sector, where the daily average number of fire spots increased dramatically (Figure 2), indicating much stronger biomass burning contribution to the air mass over the receptor site through short-range transport. In the posthaze period (10–14 Dec. 2013), the majority of air masses originated from the northwest sector, while the density of fire spot surrounding the sampling site had decreased significantly.Figure 2
Daily numbers of fire spots in different sectors: northwest sector: 100°E–119.733°E, 30.3°N–48°N; southwest sector: 100°E–119.733°E, 22°N–30.3°N; northeast sector: 119.733°E–130°E, 30.3°N–48°N; and southeast sector: 119.733°E–130°E, 22°N–30.3°N.Apparently, based on both air mass backward trajectory and fire spot distribution, it could be inferred that the air quality in the studied site had been affected by the air parcels coming from biomass burning regions via the short- and medium-range transport particularly during the haze episode in addition to the regular industrial activities and traffic emissions.


## 3.2. Temporal Trends of PM2.5 and BC

Figure3 shows the hourly mean mass concentration of PM2.5 at Lin’an regional background station from 25 Nov. to 14 Dec. 2013. Before 1 Dec. 2013, the average PM2.5 concentration was 30.4 ± 10.0 μg m−3, lower than 75 μg m−3, which is the daily average healthy threshold for residential area and countryside defined in the latest China’s National Air Quality Standard (GB3095-2012). After that the PM2.5 level started to increase, stayed above 75 μg m−3 from 15:00 on 3 Dec. to 15:00 on 9 Dec., and exceeded 250 μg m−3 at the periods of 16:00–21:00 on 6 Dec., 11:00–22:00 on 7 Dec., and 16:00–18:00 on 8 Dec. It was clearly showing that a severe haze pollution event hit the sampling site during 4~9 Dec. 2013 strongly with PM2.5 of 162.5 ± 66.6 μg m−3, and the air quality in terms of particulate level deteriorated most from 6 to 8 Dec. 2013 with PM2.5 of 203.3 ± 71.0 μg m−3. The particle concentration trend was consistent with the AQI published by Zhejiang Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau (http://www.zjepb.gov.cn/hbtmhwz/index.htm), for which PM2.5 was also categorized as the primary pollutant during this study period.Figure 3
Hourly mean mass concentration of PM2.5 and mass proportion of PM2.5 in PM10 at Lin’an regional background station.It can also be seen from Figure3 that the mass ratio of PM2.5 in PM10 (PM2.5/PM10) at Lin’an background station started to rise from 1 Dec. 2013 with the average ratio of 63.6 ± 5.6% during 1~3 Dec. 2013. Afterwards, the mean ratio of PM2.5/PM10 kept on increasing and reached 70.7 ± 5.6% during severely polluted period of 4~9 Dec. 2013, which was nearly close to the value observed in Shanghai during another large-scale haze pollution episode that happened in YRD in January 2013 [39]. During the prehaze (25~30 Nov. 2013) and posthaze (10~14 Dec. 2013) periods, the mean ratios of PM2.5/PM10 were 42.7 ± 11.2% and 56.1 ± 6.7%, respectively. This trend demonstrated that more PM2.5 had been formed and contributed to the inhalable particulate matter during the heavy haze period from 1 to 9 Dec. 2013 in terms of both mass concentration and mass ratio of PM2.5/PM10, which might explain that much stronger secondary aerosol formation and accumulation could occur including secondary organic and inorganic aerosols during such a haze pollution event in this studied region [44].Figure4 presented the scatter distribution of hourly mean concentrations of BC and PM2.5 at Lin’an background station during three periods: prehaze period (25~30 Nov. 2013), haze period (4~9 Dec. 2013), and posthaze period (10~14 Dec. 2013). The temporal concentration trends of both BC and PM2.5 seemed very consistent, and the square of correlation coefficient of concentrations of BC and PM2.5 was up to 0.58 (prehaze period), 0.79 (haze period), and 0.86 (posthaze period), respectively, with 99% confidence interval. As for the fact that it is well known that BC is essentially a primary pollutant emitted from various combustion processes, the high correlation coefficient of concentrations of BC and PM2.5 during haze period indirectly confirmed that BC was emitted from the similar sources to those precursors which contributed largely to the formation of PM2.5 in this region. The mass ratio of BC in PM2.5 accounted for 8.03 ± 2.46%, 6.99 ± 0.91%, and 8.95 ± 1.40% in prehaze, haze, and posthaze periods, respectively. It can be clearly seen that the mass proportion of BC in PM2.5 was lower during haze period, which was also observed in other cities of China, such as Shanghai and Guangzhou, where the significant increase of secondary species caused the haze days [6, 39].Figure 4
Scatter distribution of hourly mean concentrations of BC and PM2.5 at Lin’an background station: (a) prehaze period, (b) haze period, and (c) posthaze period.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.3. Temporal Trends of CO2, CO, and CH4

Both CO2 and CO are directly and indirectly related with the emission from combustion of fossil fuels (oil, natural gas, and coal), solid waste, biomass (e.g., wood products) and with various industrial processes (e.g., cement kilns); CH4 is mainly released through agricultural practices including livestock, biomass burning, and the decay of landfill wastes, though it could also be emitted during the production and transport of fossil fuels (e.g., natural gas).Figure5 describes the hourly mean concentrations of CO2, CO, and CH4 at Lin’an background station from 25 Nov. to 14 Dec. 2013. Before 1 Dec., the occurrence levels of CO2, CO, and CH4 maintained their concentrations below 420.7 ppm, 0.54 ppm, and 2.00 ppm, respectively. From 1 Dec. to 3 Dec., they started to increase gradually and reached the peak of 429.6 ppm (CO2), 0.82 ppm (CO), and 2.07 ppm (CH4), respectively. During the period of 4~9 Dec., concentrations of these pollutants jumped noticeably, especially from 16:00 on 6 Dec. to 10:00 on 8 Dec., with the peak values of 494.2 ppm (CO2), 2.18 ppm (CO), and 2.45 ppm (CH4), respectively. The occurrence levels of these three pollutants decreased to 427.8 ± 9.6 ppm (CO2), 0.78 ± 0.19 ppm (CO), and 2.07 ± 0.06 ppm (CH4) during the posthaze period of 10~14 Dec., though the haze had not degraded completely. This occurrence trend was generally consistent with that of PM2.5 and BC mentioned above. The spikes and trends of these three atmospheric gases during this sampling period could be attributed to the following factors: (1) besides the regular industrial activities, the fire spots in surrounding region may have some effect especially during the haze period when the emission intensity could be strengthened, which was verified by the analysis in Section 3.1; (2) stagnant atmospheric condition would contribute to the stronger accumulation of these pollutants, for which more details could be found in Section 3.4.Figure 5
Hourly mean concentrations of CO2, CO, and CH4 at Lin’an background station.


## 3.4. Meteorological Effects on Temporal Trends of Concerned Pollutants

During the sampling period from 25 Nov. to 14 Dec., no precipitation was observed at Lin’an station, and relative humidity (RH) was lower than 80% at most of the time. The result in Figure6 had shown a very clear temporal trend that the visibility was mostly more than 10 km during the prehaze period, dropped down to less than 5 km during the strong haze episode, and improved to some extent from 11 Dec. 2013. It needs to be pointed out that fog occurred during two periods of 21:00 on 6 Dec.~11:00 on 7 Dec. and 22:00 on 7 Dec.~9:00 on 8 Dec. when RH exceeded 80% and visibility fell down below 1 km (Figure 6). The visibility reduction could be attributed to the light extinction by both water vapor and haze aerosols during the above two slots. However, due to the wet scavenging of particles by fog droplets, PM2.5 concentration dropped evidently in these two durations, while the concentrations of CO2, CO, and CH4 presented much less decrements (Figures 3 and 5). Given that all the simultaneous measurements of these pollutants were conducted at the same site, the fog droplet size distribution could be considered the same during the entire fog deposition process; the discrepancy between concentration reductions of particle and the other three gases might be because the particle wet scavenging efficiency would be much more dominant than that of CO2, CO, and CH4 as the latter is generally affected by gas dissolution and surface adsorption [45, 46].Figure 6
Hourly visibility, relative humidity, surface wind speed, and wind direction at Lin’an station.Similar to those reported in previous studies [2, 10, 15, 17], weak surface wind speed was also observed at Lin’an station during this strong haze event. The average wind speed was 1.57 ± 0.84 m s−1 from 00:00 on 4 Dec. to 08:00 on 9 Dec., it was lower than 2.10 ± 1.25 m s−1 in prehaze period from 00:00 on 25 Nov. to 23:00 on 30 Nov., and it remained at the level of 1.48 ± 0.87 m s−1 in posthaze period from 00:00 on 10 Dec. to 23:00 on 14 Dec. (Figure 6). A weak surface high-pressure system persisted in YRD from 4 to 6 Dec. 2013 (Figure 7), and, at 08:00 in the morning, thermal inversion was observed under 200 masl (Figure 8), so that the weather condition was disadvantageous for dispersion. On 7 Dec., surface high-pressure system became weaker, and on 8 Dec. saddle ground pressure field controlled this region; thermal inversion occurred between 200 and 800 masl, so the dispersion condition remained poor. From 08:00 on 9 Dec. a strong Mongolia anticyclone came over; thus the surface wind speed increased significantly and the thermal inversion disappeared, which were deemed to benefit the dispersion and circulation of atmospheric pollutants so that their occurrence levels dropped considerably as shown in Figures 3 and 5.Figure 7
Surface weather patterns over eastern Asia at 08:00 (local time) on 6, 7, 8, and 9 Dec. 2013 (fromhttp://web.kma.go.kr/).Figure 8
Temperature soundings at Hangzhou station at 08:00 (local time) on 4~9 Dec. 2013 (fromhttp://weather.uwyo.edu/upperair/sounding.html).


## 3.5. Diurnal Variation of CO2, CO, CH4, BC, and PM2.5

Figure9 demonstrated the diurnal variation of concentrations of CO2, CO, CH4, BC, and PM2.5 between prehaze (25~30 Nov. 2013) and strong haze (4~9 Dec. 2013) periods. In prehaze period, the diurnal variations of CO2, BC, and PM2.5 seemed to be significant with the diurnal amplitudes of 10.4 ppm (CO2), 2.4 μg m−3 (BC), and 17.7 μg m−3 (PM2.5), respectively, while the diurnal amplitudes of CO and CH4 were only 0.10 ppm and 0.036 ppm, respectively, though the diurnal variations were still slightly observable. The diurnal distribution of CO2 concentration showed a single-peak pattern with the peak value occurring at 8:00; CH4 concentration exhibited double peaks at 9:00 and 22:00; BC and PM2.5 concentrations presented three peaks appearing at 9:00, 18:00, and 23:00. The diurnal CO2 distribution in prehaze period was similar to the observations during winter season at this station in 2009~2011 [42] which indicated that the diurnal CO2 variation was affected predominantly by meteorological dispersion conditions and sources/sinks [42, 47]. Due to the active photosynthetic/respiration fluxes in all seasons at Lin’an station, the minimum concentration appeared in the afternoon when the diffusion condition was more favorable and the photosynthetic CO2 uptake was strong, while the higher concentration appeared at dawn when the boundary layer became stable and the respiration was strong. The diurnal variations of CH4, BC, and PM2.5 were also consistent with the diurnal cycle of the boundary layer which led to a peak in the morning and a minimum value in the afternoon. Moreover, due to the anthropogenic sources, especially from the vehicular emission at the morning and evening rush hours, the concentrations of CO, BC, and PM2.5 presented dual peaks at 9:00 and 18:00, respectively, which was similar to that observed at other locations [4, 48]. CH4 had not shown that peak in the afternoon possibly because of the photochemical reaction induced by O
H
∙ [41]. At 22:00~23:00, the concentrations of CH4, CO, BC, and PM2.5 presented another peak, which might be ascribed to high accumulation rates at nighttime [49]; after that, due to the decrease of anthropogenic emissions, the concentrations declined until early morning, though the mixing height and wind speed remained constant and low [50].Figure 9
Diurnal concentration variations of CO2, CO, CH4, BC, and PM2.5 at Lin’an regional background station.During strong haze period, more significant diurnal variations were observed. The concentrations of all these five pollutants jumped dramatically during each hour of the day, and the diurnal amplitude rose up to 16.4 ppm (CO2), 0.33 ppm (CO), 0.086 ppm (CH4), 6.9 μg m−3 (BC), and 106.6 μg m−3 (PM2.5), respectively. The diurnal distributions of these pollutants displayed a trimodal pattern, reaching the peak value at 9:00~10:00, 17:00~18:00, and 21:00~22:00, respectively, with the maximum value occurring at 17:00~18:00 and the minimum value occurring at 5:00~6:00, except for CO2 whose minimum value still occurred at 15:00. It is understandable that CO2 concentration reached the minimum in the afternoon which was the same as in the prehaze period due to the stronger photosynthesis uptake during that time. For CO, CH4, BC, and PM2.5, the minimum concentrations occurred in the early morning, which could be explained by the fact that the emission intensity of these pollutants could be much lesser during the late nighttime. It was also clear that the occurrence levels of these four pollutants had been increased considerably from early morning to midnight. This trend could be also attributed to stronger industrial activities, traffic emission, and lesser favorable dispersion conditions. In addition, it could not be ignored that the regional short- and medium-range transport had contributed to the peaking of these four pollutants in the afternoon.


## 3.6. Correlation of CO2, CO, CH4, and BC

Table1 exhibited the correlation coefficient of concentrations of BC, CO, CO2, and CH4. It was manifestly seen that the correlation coefficient in haze period was significantly higher than that in prehaze period, which was also observed at Mt. Fuji, Japan, during smoke event [19]. The concentrations of BC, CO, CO2, and CH4 seemed to experience a more similar evolution in haze period. ΔCO/ΔCO2 (slope of hourly mean concentrations of CO and CO2) and ΔCH4/ΔCO2 in haze period were higher than those in prehaze period. Generally, higher ΔCO/ΔCO2 indicated relatively lower combustion efficiency and it is also known that the combustion efficiency of biomass burning is normally lower than that of fossil fuel as biomass burning is more of smoldering fires [25]. In addition, modified combustion efficiency (MCE, defined as ΔCO2/ΔCO + ΔCO2) has been adopted and it shows that MCE in haze episode (0.979) was also lower than that in prehaze period (0.985). Streets et al. [51] had reported the emission ratio of CH4/CO2 derived from the emission inventory compiled in 2000 was 1.80 (Gg/Tg) from biomass burning, higher than 1.38 (Gg/Tg) from fossil fuel combustion in YRD. The ΔBC/ΔCO ratio in prehaze period was 0.0075 μg m−3/μg m−3, close to the value of 0.008 μg m−3/μg m−3 in northern China in 2005 [52], while in haze period the ratio dropped to 0.0058 μg m−3/μg m−3. Smoldering biomass burning in YRD region is known to be dominant. During the haze period, significantly additional CO and BC could be emitted due to the incomplete biomass burning, while more BC might have been removed via wet scavenging process by fog droplets through the internal mixture with water soluble species when the air masses had been long transported [19], leading to lower ΔBC/ΔCO ratio in the haze episode. Consistent with the findings from air mass backward trajectory analysis, ΔCO/ΔCO2, ΔCH4/ΔCO2, and ΔBC/ΔCO all therefore implied that the biomass burning in this region had contributed more to the formation of haze occurring during 4–9 Dec. 2013.Table 1
Correlation coefficient (CC) of concentrations of BC, CO, CO2, and CH4 and the ratio of ΔBC/ΔCO, ΔCO/ΔCO2, and ΔCH4/ΔCO2 at Lin’an station.
Prehaze period
Haze period
CC between BC and CO#
0.5346
0.7534
CC between CO andC
O
2
#
0.7922
0.9599
CC between CH4 and C
O
2
#
0.5769
0.9460
ΔBC/ΔCO (μg m−3/μg m−3)
0.0075
0.0058
ΔCO/ΔCO2 (ppm/ppm)
0.0150
0.0217
ΔCH4/ΔCO2 (ppm/ppm)
0.0022
0.0054
P
#
<
0.0001.


## 4. Conclusion

Air mass backward trajectory and fire spot distribution showed that medium/long range transboundary transport of air masses coming from biomass burning regions contributed to the formation of haze aerosols in Lin’an on 4~9 Dec. 2013 when a heavy air pollution attacked Yangtze River Delta, China. The stagnant meteorological conditions, including low surface wind speed, thermal inversion in planetary boundary layer, and weak high-pressure system, attributed to the accumulation of pollutants in haze period. Higher PM2.5 mass concentration and mass ratio of PM2.5/PM10 in haze period indicated more PM2.5 had been formed and contributed to the inhalable particulate matter during such a haze pollution event in this region. Lower mass ratio of BC/PM2.5 in haze period might explain that much more secondary aerosol had been formed and accumulated.In haze period, due to the influence of stronger industrial activities, traffic emission, lesser favorable dispersion conditions, and regional transboundary transport, the diurnal variation of CO2, CO, CH4, BC, and PM2.5 concentration presented a similar distribution, displaying a trimodal pattern. The correlation analysis of concentrations of CO2, CO, CH4, and BC indicated that biomass burning might play a role in this polluted episode. The lower correlation coefficient of BC and CO than that of CO and CO2, CH4 and CO2 in haze period, suggested more BC could be possibly removed through wet scavenging process by fog droplets on 6~8 Dec.



---

*Source: 7240486-2016-04-11.xml*