# Propagation Channel Comparison between 23.5 and 45 GHz in Conference Scenario

Authors: Jianwu Dou; Nan Zhang; Li Tian; Xiaoyi Yang; Xi Yuan; Suping Mei; Haiming Wang
Journal: Chinese Journal of Engineering
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

The characteristics of propagation channel at 23.5 and 45 GHz in an indoor conference room are studied based on hybrid approach. A ray-based simulator which includes the reflection, penetration, diffraction, and diffuse scattering is adopted to generate the massive channel realizations. This platform is well calibrated in path and power delay profile (PDP) levels according to some specified measurements at different frequencies. Subsequently, according to the simulated channel samples, the statistical channel model for both the large and small scale characteristics is established based on the alpha-beta approach and extended Saleh-Valenzuela (S-V) structure, respectively. Results show that the slope of fitted path loss (PL) is less than free space due to the waveguide effect for both 23.5 and 45 GHz in indoor scenario and larger PL is experienced at higher frequency. Additionally, the cluster is more centralized with less spreads and decaying faster in delay domain at 45 GHz.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

For satisfying the increasing demands of the cellular system capacity and overcoming the spectrum congestion below 6 GHz, the millimeter wave is considered as a promising candidate for the fifth-generation (5G) communication systems [1–3]. Since the channel models have significant influences on the simulation for the performance evaluation of wireless communication techniques, the channel investigations at high frequency have been popular in both industry and academia.In general, two mainstream methods, that is, measurement-based stochastic and ray-based deterministic approaches, are adopted to construct reliable channel models. Conventionally, the measurement-based approach dominates the channel investigation at low frequencies, namely, below 6 GHz. Many classical statistical channel models, such as WINNER II, 3GPP SCM, and ITU, are established in this way [4–6]. At high frequencies, due to the large propagation loss, the channel measurement campaigns, which were conducted by the platform equipped with horn antennas with large gain, are becoming popular [2, 7–9]. However, many drawbacks are also introduced; that is, the time consumption of the measurement is drastically increased; since that, the horn antennas need to be rotated for all azimuth-elevation pairs to capture the channel spatial characteristics at both Tx and Rx sides. And sufficient channel samples are difficult to be collected within the coherent time. Meanwhile, the resolution in spatial domain is limited by the rotation step of the antenna in measurement (usually equal to the half-power beamwidth (HPBW) of the horn antenna) and the radiation patterns are also slightly overlapped when the antennas are directed to different angles. It is difficult to eliminate the effects of antenna pattern when studying pure channel characteristics in both large and small scale. Therefore, the accuracy of the measurement-based model would not be persuasive as well.Currently, researches show that the propagation channel in high frequency can be well reproduced by considering a few number of paths originating from different mechanism, that is, specular reflection, diffraction, and background scattering, due to the much more severe propagation and penetration loss [11, 12]. Thus, the ray-based deterministic modeling approaches with lower complexity have been found to be more suitable for studying the high-frequency channels since they are more flexible to be implemented in various cases under different configurations. Besides, the channel evolutionary behavior over time and spatial domains can be more accurately represented for new algorithm evaluation, that is, beam-tracking. However, the accuracy of ray-based model highly depends on the fineness of the digitized map and the calibration of the RT method is well done, that is, electromagnetic properties of the materials and the order of the interactions implemented in the simulation.Considering the efficiency and accuracy of the channel modeling, a hybrid approach involving the intrinsic advantages of both measurement- and ray-based method is proposed in this paper. The diagram of procedures for this method is shown in Figure1 and total 5 main steps are involved:(1)
The selected scenario refers to a specified case or a kind of scenes with well defined geometric and electromagnetic properties.(2)
The behaviors of the dominant components (dominant component refers to the specular rays with larger power, which are usually originating from direct LoS, reflection, and diffraction), that is, the distribution and time- or spatial-evolutionary characteristics, are well reproduced since they are directly calculated in the deterministic way.(3)
The statistical model stands for the features of propagation channel in cluster level. It can be obtained from massive channel samples which are taken from measurement or simulation based on a calibrated method. This part will be elaborated as in this paper.(4)
The random component represents the influence of human blockage (human blockage represents that one ray is blocked due to the existence of human and this effect can be studied in both larger scale and small scale level. In the large scale level, the human blockage can be modeled as additional shadow fading and, in small scale level, the influence on the propagation ray is studied [13–15]. Considering the application in high frequency, the second way is preferable) and blink rays (the blink ray refers to the ray originated from the randomly existing objects, i.e., the vehicle in outdoor cases and the ornaments in the indoor scenes, and these kinks of rays are mostly single bounce) in specified cases. These phenomenons are difficultly investigated by measurement due to the various configurations, and establishing statistical models based on the extensive simulation results is a preferable way.(5)
Finally, the obtained pure channel can be applied according to specified demand; that is, the channel can be combined with different antenna pattern, system configurations.The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, the data acquisition based on measurement and ray-tracing are introduced briefly. Section 3 elaborates the performance evaluation of the ray-tracing based on measurement data in different frequency. The modeling results and comparison are presented in Section 4. Finally, conclusive remarks are given in Section 5.Figure 1
Diagram of the proposed hybrid modeling approach.


## 2. Data Acquisition

### 2.1. Measurement Campaign

The channel measurement is conducted in a typical indoor conference room located in the wireless valley, Nanjing, China. The panorama of the environment is depicted in Figure2. Measurements have been carried out in a static configuration; that is, the transmitter (Tx) was located in a high corner of room to emulate an access point, and the receiver (Rx) as shown in Figure 2 has been moved in 10 and 30 different locations at 45 and 23.5 GHz, respectively.Figure 2
Panorama of the indoor measurement environment.For each position, the channel frequency response has been recorded by using the automatic channel sounding system [16]. An Agilent signal generator E8257D was used in Tx site and an Agilent VNA N5245A in frequency-sweep mode was adopted to collect the channel frequency response in Rx site. Both of them are synchronized by the common reference signal source. The measurement procedure and data storage were controlled by a computer. Two vertical-polarized horn antennas were installed on the customer-made rotary tables at both the Tx and Rx terminals. At each Rx position, the spatial channel information is captured by rotating the Tx and Rx in both azimuth and elevation domains successively. The measurement configurations are listed in Table 1 and more details about the measurement campaign can be found in [16]. The peak detection method is used to identify the path in delay domain, and the spatial parameters are assigned according to the boresights of rotated antenna pairs with the spatial resolution limited by the rotating step.Table 1
Channel sounding configurations.
Parameter
Settings
Center frequency
44.955 GHz
23.5 GHz
Bandwidth
660 MHz
Transmit power
10 dBm
Antenna type
Linearly polarized horn antenna
Antenna gain
23.7 dBi
18.9 dBi
Half-power beamwidth
11°
18.2°
Sweep frequency points
256
Sweep frequency duration
80 ms
Cycles per measurement
8
Tx height
1.95 m
Rx height
1 m


### 2.2. Ray-Tracing Simulation

A self-developed ray-tracing (RT) software was implemented in this research. Total three main steps are involved to generate the channel realizations, that is, constructing the 3D digital map for specified scenario, calculating the geometric trace for each ray, and adopting the electromagnetic properties according to simulation configurations. The digitized map is built by measuring the geometric parameters of all the major objects (such as walls, tables, bookshelves, coated glasses, etc.) in the room. Then, a commercial software “Sketchup Pro” [17] is used to reconstruct the scenario as shown in Figure 3.Figure 3
Digitized map for the specified scenario.The propagation paths which originate from the propagation mechanisms of line-of-sight (LoS), reflection, diffraction, and penetration, are identified by the aforementioned 3D image-based RT platform. The complex coefficients of LoS and reflected and diffracted ray are calculated according to the free-space Friis equation, Fresnel formulas, and the uniform theory of diffraction (UTD) [18–20], respectively. Meanwhile, at high frequencies, the nonnegligible diffuse scattering, which refers to the back-reflection from rough surfaces or nonhomogenous materials, is implemented by adopting the directive scattering pattern based on the “effective roughness” (ER) scattering model [21–24]. The rough surfaces of each object are discretized into multiple small tiles, and for each tile the far-field assumption should be satisfied. Under noncoherent assumption, the phase of each scattering path is randomly assigned.The digitalized map of this scene is shown in Figure3 with the color-coded materials. The calibrated electromagnetic properties (i.e., relative permittivity and conductivity) at specified frequency are adopted [25]. At most, 3 reflections, 1 diffraction, and 1 scattering together with 10 penetrations are considered in our simulation by considering the trade-off between modeling accuracy and complexity. An example of the simulated specular paths by using ray-tracing tool is illustrated in Figure 4. The other configurations such as bandwidth, transmit power, and antenna radiation patterns are the same as the measurement for further RT calibration.Figure 4
Illustration of the specular paths simulated by ray-tracing for the specified scenario.


## 2.1. Measurement Campaign

The channel measurement is conducted in a typical indoor conference room located in the wireless valley, Nanjing, China. The panorama of the environment is depicted in Figure2. Measurements have been carried out in a static configuration; that is, the transmitter (Tx) was located in a high corner of room to emulate an access point, and the receiver (Rx) as shown in Figure 2 has been moved in 10 and 30 different locations at 45 and 23.5 GHz, respectively.Figure 2
Panorama of the indoor measurement environment.For each position, the channel frequency response has been recorded by using the automatic channel sounding system [16]. An Agilent signal generator E8257D was used in Tx site and an Agilent VNA N5245A in frequency-sweep mode was adopted to collect the channel frequency response in Rx site. Both of them are synchronized by the common reference signal source. The measurement procedure and data storage were controlled by a computer. Two vertical-polarized horn antennas were installed on the customer-made rotary tables at both the Tx and Rx terminals. At each Rx position, the spatial channel information is captured by rotating the Tx and Rx in both azimuth and elevation domains successively. The measurement configurations are listed in Table 1 and more details about the measurement campaign can be found in [16]. The peak detection method is used to identify the path in delay domain, and the spatial parameters are assigned according to the boresights of rotated antenna pairs with the spatial resolution limited by the rotating step.Table 1
Channel sounding configurations.
Parameter
Settings
Center frequency
44.955 GHz
23.5 GHz
Bandwidth
660 MHz
Transmit power
10 dBm
Antenna type
Linearly polarized horn antenna
Antenna gain
23.7 dBi
18.9 dBi
Half-power beamwidth
11°
18.2°
Sweep frequency points
256
Sweep frequency duration
80 ms
Cycles per measurement
8
Tx height
1.95 m
Rx height
1 m


## 2.2. Ray-Tracing Simulation

A self-developed ray-tracing (RT) software was implemented in this research. Total three main steps are involved to generate the channel realizations, that is, constructing the 3D digital map for specified scenario, calculating the geometric trace for each ray, and adopting the electromagnetic properties according to simulation configurations. The digitized map is built by measuring the geometric parameters of all the major objects (such as walls, tables, bookshelves, coated glasses, etc.) in the room. Then, a commercial software “Sketchup Pro” [17] is used to reconstruct the scenario as shown in Figure 3.Figure 3
Digitized map for the specified scenario.The propagation paths which originate from the propagation mechanisms of line-of-sight (LoS), reflection, diffraction, and penetration, are identified by the aforementioned 3D image-based RT platform. The complex coefficients of LoS and reflected and diffracted ray are calculated according to the free-space Friis equation, Fresnel formulas, and the uniform theory of diffraction (UTD) [18–20], respectively. Meanwhile, at high frequencies, the nonnegligible diffuse scattering, which refers to the back-reflection from rough surfaces or nonhomogenous materials, is implemented by adopting the directive scattering pattern based on the “effective roughness” (ER) scattering model [21–24]. The rough surfaces of each object are discretized into multiple small tiles, and for each tile the far-field assumption should be satisfied. Under noncoherent assumption, the phase of each scattering path is randomly assigned.The digitalized map of this scene is shown in Figure3 with the color-coded materials. The calibrated electromagnetic properties (i.e., relative permittivity and conductivity) at specified frequency are adopted [25]. At most, 3 reflections, 1 diffraction, and 1 scattering together with 10 penetrations are considered in our simulation by considering the trade-off between modeling accuracy and complexity. An example of the simulated specular paths by using ray-tracing tool is illustrated in Figure 4. The other configurations such as bandwidth, transmit power, and antenna radiation patterns are the same as the measurement for further RT calibration.Figure 4
Illustration of the specular paths simulated by ray-tracing for the specified scenario.


## 3. Performance Evaluation of the RT Simulator

Before conducting the extensive simulations to generate the channel realizations, the RT software is calibrated in two aspects with different measurement configurations. According to the proposed hybrid channel model approach shown in Figure1, the framework of the propagation channel is determined by the dominant components, so the specular path level comparison between the measurement and simulation is done firstly.Figure5 illustrates the ray comparison between measurement and simulation. The blue lines with arrow refer to the direction of the ray obtained from the measurement, and the red solid lines illustrate the trace for the same path based on RT simulator. It can be found that the dominant paths, that is, LoS and double bounces reflection paths, are well matched. The slight mismatches in the direction are observed since the spatial resolution of the measurement is limited by the antenna rotation step. This phenomenon also demonstrates that the performance of current measurement-based channel modeling approach is easily affected by the measurement configurations.Figure 5
An example of ray-level comparison between measurement and simulation.
(a)
LoS path
(b)
Two-bounce reflectionThe power-delay-profile (PDP) which depicts the power decaying phenomena along the travel distance is used as a common metric for the evaluation of multipath channel simulation. The measurement-based PDP is derived from the captured channel frequency response as(1)Pτ=hτ2,hτ=F-1Hf,where H(f) is the channel transfer function in the frequency domain, h(τ) means the channel impulse response (CIR) in the delay domain, and F-1 denotes the inverse Fourier transfer. Simulation results are obtained from the RT software with the calibrated parameters, that is, directivity α=1 and α=10 for 23.5 GHz and 45 GHz, respectively, with the same scattering coefficient S=0.8, in ER model. The verifications for these parameters in diffuse scattering are conducted by calculating the minimum mean square error (MMSE) between the measured and simulated PDP. The parameter values which lead to the smallest MMSE are adopted as in [11, 22, 26].The comparison of the PDPs is shown in Figure6, where the the measured PDP, simulation results of specular RT (the specular RT refers to the RT only involving the LoS, penetration, reflection, and diffraction, no diffuse scattering effect is considered), and the combination of the specular RT and scattering are demonstrated. It can be observed from the comparison results that (1) most of the dominant components are captured by ray-tracing simulation, (2) the specular peaks in the PDP are extended to cluster-alike dispersive components and more realistic and continuous PDPs are obtained by adopting scattering phenomenon in RT method. and (3) some strong components around 100 ns and 70 ns can also be found in the PDP of 23.5 and 45 GHz, respectively. By comparing the room size with the large travel distance for these paths, we speculate that wave reverberation is also significant in such kind of indoor room. Therefore, multiple bounces paths, that is, diffuse scattering or specular reflection combined with scattering [22, 27], should be implemented in RT if the time consumption for simulation is acceptable.Figure 6
Comparison of the power delay profiles.
(a)
PDP comparison at 23.5 GHz
(b)
PDP comparison at 45 GHz [10]


## 4. Modeling Results

After the validation of the RT tool, it is further adopted to generate massive channel samples. In the extensive simulations, ideal isotropic antennas are used in both Tx and Rx sides. The Tx is stable at the location as shown in Figure4 and the Rx is assumed to move within the whole room with a step of 0.2 m. Totally, 4500 snapshots of channel data are collected and the statistical channel model for both large and small scale parameters are established based on these samples.


### 4.1. Larger Scale Channel Model

The path loss (PL) for both frequencies and scenarios is described by the alpha-beta model as [28](2)PLd=α·log⁡d+β+σSF,where d means the distance between Tx and Rx. α and β are the slope and intercept for the fitted path loss, respectively. σSF stands for the standard deviation of the shadow fading (SF) following the log-normal distribution with the mean equal to zero.The comparisons of PL in LoS and NLoS at different frequency are depicted by Figures7 and 8, respectively. Comparing with the 23.5 GHz, larger PLs can be found at 45 GHz in both LoS and NLoS cases. Due to the waveguide-like effect in indoor environment, the slopes of all fitted PL are less than free space [29, 30]. Since the distributions of the samples are dispersive in both 23.5 and 45 GHz, severer SFs are also observed in NLoS scenarios and the detail of fitted parameters are listed in Table 2.Table 2
Path loss and shadow fading.
Parameters
23.5 GHz
45 GHz
LoS
NLoS
LoS
NLoS
Path loss
(15.38, 63.72)
(17.81, 70.45)
(13.73, 69.86)
(18, 74.46)
σ
S
F
0.89
1.53
0.97
1.57Figure 7
Path loss comparison in LoS scenario.Figure 8
Path loss comparison in NLoS scenario.


### 4.2. Small Scale Channel Model

For good understanding of the channel characteristics, the signal model of the channel impulse response (CIR) is implemented to analyze the small scale parameters as(3)ht,Θ=∑l=1L∑k=1Kαl,k·δt-τl,k·δϕTx-ϕTxl,k·δθTx-θTxl,k·δϕRx-ϕRxl,k·δθRx-θRxl,k,where Θ=[α,τ,ϕTx,θTx,ϕRx,θRx] represents the parameter set consisting of complex channel coefficient, azimuth of departure (AoD), elevation of departure (EoD), azimuth of arrival (AoA), and elevation of arrival (EoA), respectively. (l,k) refers to the kth path in the ith cluster.The clustering results of the simulated channel realizations, which are obtained based onK-power mean algorithm, are used to establish the statistical channel model under extended S-V framework [31, 32]. The distributions of the inter- and intracluster parameters, that is, cluster arrival rate (Λ), cluster decay factor (Γ), cluster log-normal standard deviation σ1, power of first ray, ray arrival rate λ, ray decay factor (γ), directional spreads (AoA, EoA, AoD, and EoD), and ray log-normal σ2, are investigated empirically and these best fitted distributions for all parameters are selected based on Kolmogoroff-Smirnoff (K-S) test.Figures9 and 10 depict the comparison of the cluster AoA spread for both 23.5 and 45 GHz in LoS and NLoS scenarios, respectively. The Gamma distribution with different parameters is adopted to fit these results. Comparing with the results at 23.5 GHz, smaller cluster AoA spread is observed at 45 GHz and the same trends are found for other angular spreads. It means that the cluster is more concentrated in spatial domain at high frequency. Meanwhile, the spreads in elevation domain is less, but not significant, than the results in azimuth domain, which means that the channel diversity in the elevation domain is nonneglectable, especially in the indoor scenarios with small geometric size. From the simulation results, we also find that the cluster angular spreads in NLoS case are smaller comparing with LoS case. This is strange but reasonable by further investigating the environment settings in our simulation. As shown in Figure 5, the Tx locates at half part of the conference and the the whole room is naturally separated as LoS and NLoS by the wall in the middle. For the UE in the NLoS, the propagation rays mainly originate from the penetration through the wall and reflection from the coated glass as shown in Figure 3. Due to the larger propagation, penetration loss, and limited reflections, the incident angular range and power of the received rays are less than the UE in LoS, and it leads to smaller angular spreads.Figure 9
CDF comparison AoA spread of rays within cluster in LoS.Figure 10
CDF comparison AoA spread of rays within cluster in NLoS.The same comparisons for the ray arrival rate within the cluster are demonstrated in Figures11 and 12. The obtained results are fitted by the Rician distribution and smaller λ is found at 45 GHz for both LoS and NLoS cases. Figures 13 and 14 illustrate the general trends of the ray decay factor in different cases and the Gaussian distribution is used to model the simulated results. From these figures, we can find that the rays within cluster decay faster at 45 GHz with regard to the 23.5 GHz. The aforementioned comparison results for λ and γ show that the cluster at 45 GHz is more concentrated than 23.5 GHz. More details about the statistical model can be found in Table 3.Table 3
Statistical channel model for 45 and 23.5 GHz based on S-V structure.
Parameters
Fitted distribution
23.5 GHz
45 GHz
LoS
NLoS
LoS
NLoS
Power of first ray
Gamma
(0.05, 5.00)
(0.07, 3.40)
(0.04, 8.90)
(0.01, 2.20)
Cluster arrival rateΛ [ns]
Uniform
(7.32, 33.47)
(15.00, 46, 18)
(6.97, 31.54)
(13.18, 44.54)
Cluster decay factorΓ [ns]
Gaussian
(2.28, 2.17)
(5.30, 2.79)
(3.78, 1.60)
(4.32, 2.15)
Cluster lognormal stdσ1 [dB]
1.65
2.15
2.17
2.79
Ray arrival rateλ [ns]
Rician
(0.13, 0.81)
(0.09, 0.70)
(0.15, 0.59)
(0.15, 0.55)
Ray decay factorγ [ns]
Gaussian
(2.05, 1.90)
(1.09, 2.80)
(1.01, 0.73)
(1.18, 0.95)
Cluster AoA spread (deg)
Gamma
(3.85, 1.70)
(2.43, 1.50)
(3.24, 1.60)
(2.24, 1.40)
Cluster EoA spread (deg)
Gamma
(3.65, 1.40)
(3.19, 1.00)
(2.04, 2.00)
(2.19, 1.00)
Cluster AoD spread (deg)
Gamma
(5.11, 1.40)
(2.58, 1.60)
(3.51, 1.50)
(2.00, 1.70)
Cluster EoD spread (deg)
Gamma
(4.62, 1.30)
(3.49, 1.10)
(3.19, 1.40)
(2.40, 1.30)
Ray lognormal stdσ2 [dB]
0.45
0.52
0.45
0.46Figure 11
CDF comparison ray arrival rate in LoS.Figure 12
CDF comparison ray arrival rate in NLoS.Figure 13
CDF comparison ray decay factor in LoS.Figure 14
CDF comparison ray decay factor in NLoS.


## 4.1. Larger Scale Channel Model

The path loss (PL) for both frequencies and scenarios is described by the alpha-beta model as [28](2)PLd=α·log⁡d+β+σSF,where d means the distance between Tx and Rx. α and β are the slope and intercept for the fitted path loss, respectively. σSF stands for the standard deviation of the shadow fading (SF) following the log-normal distribution with the mean equal to zero.The comparisons of PL in LoS and NLoS at different frequency are depicted by Figures7 and 8, respectively. Comparing with the 23.5 GHz, larger PLs can be found at 45 GHz in both LoS and NLoS cases. Due to the waveguide-like effect in indoor environment, the slopes of all fitted PL are less than free space [29, 30]. Since the distributions of the samples are dispersive in both 23.5 and 45 GHz, severer SFs are also observed in NLoS scenarios and the detail of fitted parameters are listed in Table 2.Table 2
Path loss and shadow fading.
Parameters
23.5 GHz
45 GHz
LoS
NLoS
LoS
NLoS
Path loss
(15.38, 63.72)
(17.81, 70.45)
(13.73, 69.86)
(18, 74.46)
σ
S
F
0.89
1.53
0.97
1.57Figure 7
Path loss comparison in LoS scenario.Figure 8
Path loss comparison in NLoS scenario.


## 4.2. Small Scale Channel Model

For good understanding of the channel characteristics, the signal model of the channel impulse response (CIR) is implemented to analyze the small scale parameters as(3)ht,Θ=∑l=1L∑k=1Kαl,k·δt-τl,k·δϕTx-ϕTxl,k·δθTx-θTxl,k·δϕRx-ϕRxl,k·δθRx-θRxl,k,where Θ=[α,τ,ϕTx,θTx,ϕRx,θRx] represents the parameter set consisting of complex channel coefficient, azimuth of departure (AoD), elevation of departure (EoD), azimuth of arrival (AoA), and elevation of arrival (EoA), respectively. (l,k) refers to the kth path in the ith cluster.The clustering results of the simulated channel realizations, which are obtained based onK-power mean algorithm, are used to establish the statistical channel model under extended S-V framework [31, 32]. The distributions of the inter- and intracluster parameters, that is, cluster arrival rate (Λ), cluster decay factor (Γ), cluster log-normal standard deviation σ1, power of first ray, ray arrival rate λ, ray decay factor (γ), directional spreads (AoA, EoA, AoD, and EoD), and ray log-normal σ2, are investigated empirically and these best fitted distributions for all parameters are selected based on Kolmogoroff-Smirnoff (K-S) test.Figures9 and 10 depict the comparison of the cluster AoA spread for both 23.5 and 45 GHz in LoS and NLoS scenarios, respectively. The Gamma distribution with different parameters is adopted to fit these results. Comparing with the results at 23.5 GHz, smaller cluster AoA spread is observed at 45 GHz and the same trends are found for other angular spreads. It means that the cluster is more concentrated in spatial domain at high frequency. Meanwhile, the spreads in elevation domain is less, but not significant, than the results in azimuth domain, which means that the channel diversity in the elevation domain is nonneglectable, especially in the indoor scenarios with small geometric size. From the simulation results, we also find that the cluster angular spreads in NLoS case are smaller comparing with LoS case. This is strange but reasonable by further investigating the environment settings in our simulation. As shown in Figure 5, the Tx locates at half part of the conference and the the whole room is naturally separated as LoS and NLoS by the wall in the middle. For the UE in the NLoS, the propagation rays mainly originate from the penetration through the wall and reflection from the coated glass as shown in Figure 3. Due to the larger propagation, penetration loss, and limited reflections, the incident angular range and power of the received rays are less than the UE in LoS, and it leads to smaller angular spreads.Figure 9
CDF comparison AoA spread of rays within cluster in LoS.Figure 10
CDF comparison AoA spread of rays within cluster in NLoS.The same comparisons for the ray arrival rate within the cluster are demonstrated in Figures11 and 12. The obtained results are fitted by the Rician distribution and smaller λ is found at 45 GHz for both LoS and NLoS cases. Figures 13 and 14 illustrate the general trends of the ray decay factor in different cases and the Gaussian distribution is used to model the simulated results. From these figures, we can find that the rays within cluster decay faster at 45 GHz with regard to the 23.5 GHz. The aforementioned comparison results for λ and γ show that the cluster at 45 GHz is more concentrated than 23.5 GHz. More details about the statistical model can be found in Table 3.Table 3
Statistical channel model for 45 and 23.5 GHz based on S-V structure.
Parameters
Fitted distribution
23.5 GHz
45 GHz
LoS
NLoS
LoS
NLoS
Power of first ray
Gamma
(0.05, 5.00)
(0.07, 3.40)
(0.04, 8.90)
(0.01, 2.20)
Cluster arrival rateΛ [ns]
Uniform
(7.32, 33.47)
(15.00, 46, 18)
(6.97, 31.54)
(13.18, 44.54)
Cluster decay factorΓ [ns]
Gaussian
(2.28, 2.17)
(5.30, 2.79)
(3.78, 1.60)
(4.32, 2.15)
Cluster lognormal stdσ1 [dB]
1.65
2.15
2.17
2.79
Ray arrival rateλ [ns]
Rician
(0.13, 0.81)
(0.09, 0.70)
(0.15, 0.59)
(0.15, 0.55)
Ray decay factorγ [ns]
Gaussian
(2.05, 1.90)
(1.09, 2.80)
(1.01, 0.73)
(1.18, 0.95)
Cluster AoA spread (deg)
Gamma
(3.85, 1.70)
(2.43, 1.50)
(3.24, 1.60)
(2.24, 1.40)
Cluster EoA spread (deg)
Gamma
(3.65, 1.40)
(3.19, 1.00)
(2.04, 2.00)
(2.19, 1.00)
Cluster AoD spread (deg)
Gamma
(5.11, 1.40)
(2.58, 1.60)
(3.51, 1.50)
(2.00, 1.70)
Cluster EoD spread (deg)
Gamma
(4.62, 1.30)
(3.49, 1.10)
(3.19, 1.40)
(2.40, 1.30)
Ray lognormal stdσ2 [dB]
0.45
0.52
0.45
0.46Figure 11
CDF comparison ray arrival rate in LoS.Figure 12
CDF comparison ray arrival rate in NLoS.Figure 13
CDF comparison ray decay factor in LoS.Figure 14
CDF comparison ray decay factor in NLoS.


## 5. Conclusions

In this contribution, a hybrid channel modeling approach, which involves the advantages of both deterministic simulation and measurement-based statistical analysis, was proposed. The calibrations of the RT simulator were firstly done in path and PDP levels through the comparison among simulation and measurement results. And the calibration results showed that the effect of diffuse scattering is also important at high frequencies. Subsequently, the statistical model for large and small scale channel parameters was established according to the obtained massive simulated channel realizations. It has been found that the PL is larger and the cluster is more concentrated at 45 GHz.



---

*Source: 7124267-2016-03-15.xml*