# The Influence of Hydrogen on the Properties of Zinc Sulfide Thin Films Deposited by Magnetron Sputtering

Authors: Hang Xu; Lili Wu; Wenwu Wang; Lixiang Zhang; Jingquan Zhang; Wei Li; Lianghuan Feng
Journal: International Journal of Photoenergy
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

Zinc sulfide thin films have been deposited with hydrogen in Ar and Ar+H2 atmosphere by radio frequency magnetron sputtering. The thickness, structural properties, composition, surface morphology, and optical and electrical properties of the films have been investigated. Effect of hydrogen on the properties of the film was studied. The results showed that hydrogen leads to better crystallinity and larger crystallite size of ZnS polycrystalline films. The band gaps of the films in Ar+H2 are about 3.48 eV compared with 3.24 eV without hydrogen. It is also demonstrated that hydrogen can result in a better stoichiometric composition of the films.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Zinc sulfide (ZnS) thin films have been widely used in optoelectronic device application including optical switching device, photo catalysts, and optical sensors because of their outstanding properties such as wide band gap (3.65 eV), high refractive index (2.35), and high dielectric constant [1]. Cadmium sulfide (CdS) thin films have been extensively studied for their proven applications in optoelectronic devices [2] and as a window layer in heterojunction solar cells based on cadmium telluride (CdTe) owing to their wide band gap (E
g
=
2.42 eV) and are easy to be prepared by low-cost methods [3]. Compared to CdS thin films, ZnS thin films have much higher band gap. The wide band gap is not only conducive to open circuit voltage of solar cells but also good for the film with higher film thickness as window layer to reduce lattice defects. In addition, ZnS thin films are cadmium free. So we do not have to worry about the serious environmental problems due to the large amount of Cd compound wastes during the deposition process. Thus, ZnS thin film has been considered as a promising material used as an alternative buffer layer instead of CdS film in CdTe based solar cells. Currently, ZnS buffer layers have been prepared by several methods, such as sputtering [4], chemical vapor deposition [5], chemical bath deposition (CBD) [6, 7], electrodeposition [8], and pulsed-laser deposition [9]. Among these methods, magnetron sputtering is still a relatively cost-effective deposition technique compared with those listed above and has sufficient control over the deposition rate and uniformity of the films.A few works have been published to date, which specially studied the properties of ZnS thin films deposited by RF magnetron sputtering. Hwang’s group [10] investigated the influence of different substrate temperatures on the structural and optical properties of ZnS thin films. The results showed that the ZnS films grown at 350°C exhibit a relatively high transmittance of 80% in the visible region and a strongly (111) preferred orientation with better crystallinity. However, it is not easy to maintain the uniformity of the substrate temperature when this method is applied to the manufacture of large area modules. Room temperature deposition process will be more suitable if the properties of films are satisfied. It is reported that hydrogen was commonly used as auxiliary gas in the preparation of alloy membranes, optical and semiconductor films by magnetron sputtering [11–15]. Wang’s group [16] studied the influence of H2/Ar ratio on the structural, electrical, and optical properties of hydrogen and tungsten codoped ZnO films deposited by pulsed magnetron sputtering. The research showed that hydrogen has a positive effect on the improvement of the microstructure of ZnO films. The above reports suggest that hydrogen may play an important role in magnetron sputtering and more studies of ZnS thin films deposited in atmosphere with hydrogen by RF magnetron sputtering are needed. In this paper, ZnS films were deposited at room temperature in Ar atmosphere mixed with different hydrogen flux. The effects of hydrogen on the characteristics of ZnS thin films were reported and the working mechanism of hydrogen during the sputtering process was studied theoretically.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Preparation Process

ZnS films were deposited at silica glass substrates by RF magnetron sputtering. The substrates experienced cleanser, acetone, anhydrous ethyl alcohol, and ultrasonic cleaning for about 10 minutes each and were rinsed with deionized water before drying. After cleaning, the substrates were immediately preserved in a drying cabinet. Before deposition, substrates were loaded onto the sample holder about 100 mm away from a ZnS target (99.999%) in the vacuum chamber. The chamber was pumped down to a base pressure of 1 × 10−3 Pa. Argon or argon mixed with a small amount of hydrogen was used as the sputtering gas.In order to clean the surface of the target and ensure a stable sputtering process, presputtering for several minutes was performed with an RF power of 350 W while the substrate was covered with a shield. During the deposition process, the working pressure was maintained at 0.5 Pa or 0.2 Pa. The deposition time was 30 minutes and the sputtering power was maintained at 300 W. The substrates were maintained at the room temperature.


### 2.2. Characterization Methods

The surface morphology of the films was determined by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) (Hitachi-S4800, Japan). The composition of the films on glass substrates was investigated by Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES) (Spectro ACROS, Germany). The film thickness was measured with a profile system (Ambios XP-2, America). The physical structure and grain size of the films were studied with an X-ray diffractometer (XRD) (Dandong Fangyuan DX-260, China). The electrical property of ZnS films was tested by thermal probe test system. The optical properties of the films were characterized by an UV-Visible spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer Lambda950, America) with a wavelength range from 200 nm to 2500 nm.


## 2.1. Preparation Process

ZnS films were deposited at silica glass substrates by RF magnetron sputtering. The substrates experienced cleanser, acetone, anhydrous ethyl alcohol, and ultrasonic cleaning for about 10 minutes each and were rinsed with deionized water before drying. After cleaning, the substrates were immediately preserved in a drying cabinet. Before deposition, substrates were loaded onto the sample holder about 100 mm away from a ZnS target (99.999%) in the vacuum chamber. The chamber was pumped down to a base pressure of 1 × 10−3 Pa. Argon or argon mixed with a small amount of hydrogen was used as the sputtering gas.In order to clean the surface of the target and ensure a stable sputtering process, presputtering for several minutes was performed with an RF power of 350 W while the substrate was covered with a shield. During the deposition process, the working pressure was maintained at 0.5 Pa or 0.2 Pa. The deposition time was 30 minutes and the sputtering power was maintained at 300 W. The substrates were maintained at the room temperature.


## 2.2. Characterization Methods

The surface morphology of the films was determined by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) (Hitachi-S4800, Japan). The composition of the films on glass substrates was investigated by Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES) (Spectro ACROS, Germany). The film thickness was measured with a profile system (Ambios XP-2, America). The physical structure and grain size of the films were studied with an X-ray diffractometer (XRD) (Dandong Fangyuan DX-260, China). The electrical property of ZnS films was tested by thermal probe test system. The optical properties of the films were characterized by an UV-Visible spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer Lambda950, America) with a wavelength range from 200 nm to 2500 nm.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Thickness and Structure Analysis

#### 3.1.1. Thickness of ZnS Film

In order to better understand the results or discussion, the samples were named after the sputtering pressure and hydrogen partial pressure ratios that are listed in Table1. The film thickness is shown in Figure 1. From Figure 1 we can see that the samples deposited at 0.2 Pa are thicker than those grown at 0.5 Pa. It is easy to understand because higher sputtering pressure means higher density of gas molecules, which would enhance the probability of colliding which occurred between gas molecules and sputtering particles. The colliding decreases the deposition rate of ZnS films by changing the direction of sputtering particles away from the substrates. With the increase of hydrogen, the film thickness increased at first and then decreased.Table 1
Sample names of ZnS thin films deposited in different sputtering atmosphere.
Pressure
0.5 Pa
0.2 Pa
Ar/H2 ratio
25 : 0
25 : 1
25 : 2
25 : 3
25 : 0
25 : 1
25 : 2
25 : 3
Sample name
0.5P-Ar
0.5P-H
0.5P-2H
0.5P-3H
0.2P-Ar
0.2P-H
0.2P-2H
0.2P-3HFigure 1
Thickness of the ZnS thin films deposited at varied sputtering atmosphere.It means that the amount of hydrogen had an impact on the deposition process of the films.


#### 3.1.2. Structural Properties

X-ray diffraction patterns of the ZnS films prepared in different sputtering atmosphere are shown in Figure2. Figure 2 shows that all the ZnS films are wurtzite polycrystalline structure with a preferential orientation in (100) direction.Figure 2
XRD patterns of ZnS films grown at various atmospheres.Figure3 gives the average crystallite size (D) of different ZnS films, which is calculated using Scherrer formula:
(1)
D
=
K
λ
β
cos
⁡
θ
,
where λ is the X-ray wavelength (1.5405 nm), β is the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the film diffraction peak in (100) direction, and θ is the Bragg diffraction angle.Figure 3
Crystal size (D) of the ZnS thin films.It is observed that theD values of the films deposited at 0.2 Pa were larger than those at 0.5 Pa except for 3/25 H2/Ar ratio. From Figure 3, we can see that the average grain size of the films increased at first and then decreased with the increase of hydrogen. This result is consistent with the SEM analysis (Figures 5 and 6). This means that lower sputtering pressure leads to larger crystal size and the increase of hydrogen partial pressure results in a larger crystal size except the sample with much hydrogen.


### 3.2. Composition

The ICP-OES measurements were done to determine the composition of ZnS films. Figure4 shows the influence of H2/Ar ratio on film compositions. All samples prepared in various sputtering atmospheres were nonstoichiometric, and Zn had more content than S. The Zn/S ratio decreased obviously as the H2/Ar ratios were elevated. Figure 4 also shows that the Zn/S ratios of the films at 0.2 Pa were closer to 1 : 1 compared to the samples at 0.5 Pa except the one with 2/25 H2/Ar ratio.Figure 4
Zn/S ratio of ZnS films deposited in various atmospheres.SEM images of ZnS films grown in various atmospheres. (a) 0.5P-Ar, (b) 0.5P-H, (c) 0.5P-2H, and (d) 0.5P-3H.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)SEM images of ZnS films grown in various atmospheres. (a) 0.2P-Ar, (b) 0.2P-H, (c) 0.2P-2H, and (d) 0.2P-3H.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)It means that lower sputtering pressure results in a better stoichiometry and the introduction of hydrogen leads to a near stoichiometry of Zn/S ratio. But the upper limit of H2/Ar ratio was chosen to be 3 : 25 because higher content of hydrogen decreases the grain size of ZnS films (Figure 6(d)) and may cause hydrogen doping [17] although it leads to stoichiometric composition of films.It is difficult to have a good understanding of the mechanism how hydrogen leads to a better Zn/S ratio. But we try to understand it as follows. Zinc oxide film was obtained only or cannot be avoided until the well optimization of sputtering conditions during the ZnS deposition. The sputtering particles bombarded out from ZnS target by argon ions, such asZn
2
+, S
2
-, ZnS, and molecular clusters, would present strong oxidability or reducibility caused by the small size effect. On the other hand, it is difficult to keep all the oxygen away from the vacuum chamber. Even a small amount of oxygen can result in the redox reaction and the growth of zinc oxide film on the substrate instead of ZnS film. Thus, hydrogen was introduced to prevent the sputtering particles from oxidation by maintaining a reducing protective atmosphere. This idea was supported because a small amount of hydrogen sulfide was smelled when the vacuum chamber was just open after deposition and there was some yellow elemental sulfide found at the surface of ZnS target. These results demonstrated that hydrogen indeed had the effect of reduction during the magnetron sputtering process.


### 3.3. Surface Morphology

Figures5 and 6 show the surface morphology of the ZnS films scanned by SEM. Figure 5 shows the morphology of the films deposited at 0.5 Pa with different H2/Ar ratio. Figure 6 shows the morphology of the films deposited at 0.2 Pa with different H2/Ar ratio. In general, the surface of the ZnS films is smooth and compact with uniform particles.From Figures5 and 6, we know that the surface morphology of ZnS films deposited at different atmospheres has no obvious difference except the particle sizes. The change of grain size in SEM images is small and not easy to find out while it can be clearly differentiated by crystal size calculated from XRD peak. In Figure 6, the SEM images of 0.2P-H and 0.2P-2H show the larger grain size and clear grain boundary while the images of 0.2P-Ar and 0.2P-3H show the small crystal size, corresponding to the variation of crystal size in Figure 3.These images indicate that ZnS films deposited at 0.2 Pa have better crystallinity and hydrogen can promote the crystal size of the film to some extent. This may be explained by the dynamic equilibrium between surface enhanced diffusion and selective etching effect of hydrogen. There is a plasma area produced by the RF power during the process of RF magnetron sputtering. In the plasma area, there are some important reactions [18]:
(2)
H
2
*
*
+
H
2
*
⟶
H
2
+
+
H
2
+
e
which shows the excitation transfer and radioactive decay process of excited hydrogen:
(3)
H
2
+
+
H
2
⟶
H
3
+
+
H
Ar
+
+
H
2
⟶
ArH
+
+
H
which shows the generation process of ArH
+, H
3
+, and hydrogen radical (H).Hydrogen radical leads to surface diffusion effect [19–21] and selective etching effect [21, 22] in a-Si:H, μc-Si:H, or c-Si:H deposition. Surface diffusion effect is conducive to grain growth and selective etching effect not only makes the film surface smooth but also leads to small grain, corresponding to the results in Figures 3, 5, and 6. The effects of hydrogen on the morphology of ZnS films were similar to those of a-Si:H, μc-Si:H, or c-Si:H. But further study such as molecular dynamics simulations, infrared spectroscopy, and other means may be put into use to have a better understanding in this respect.


### 3.4. Optical and Electrical Properties

The optical transmittance spectra of ZnS thin films in the wavelength range of 300 to 500 nm are shown in Figure7. It shows an obvious difference in the absorption edge of films with and without hydrogen and little difference between 0.5 and 0.2 Pa. The absorption edge of samples with hydrogen is about 30 nm short wavelength shift compared with those without hydrogen.Figure 7
Transmittance versus wavelength spectra of ZnS films grown at various sputtering pressures.Table2 lists the optical band gap (E
g) of the above ZnS films. The optical band gaps were calculated from the following expression by assuming a direct transition between valance and conduction bands:
(4)
(
α
h
ν
)
2
=
D
(
h
ν
-
E
g
)
,
whereD is a constant,h is Planck’s constant, and α is the optical absorption coefficient. E
g can be estimated by extrapolating the straight-line portion of the spectrum to a zero absorption coefficient value. In Table 2, the band gaps of the films in pure Ar are 3.24 eV and 3.25 eV, respectively. The band gaps of the films in Ar+H2 are all about 3.48 eV. It means that the existence of hydrogen had a big influence on the optical band gaps of ZnS films grown by RF magnetron sputtering. But it seems that the amount of hydrogen has not made obvious influence on the band gap of films.Table 2
The optical band gaps of the films deposited in various sputtering atmospheres.
Sample name
Band gap (eV)
0.5P-Ar
3.24
0.5P-H
3.48
0.5P-2H
3.46
0.5P-3H
3.48
0.2P-Ar
3.25
0.2P-H
3.47
0.2P-2H
3.50
0.2P-3H
3.50The resistivity of all ZnS films was measured to be in the magnitude of 105~106 Ω·cm and the conduction type could not be obtained by thermal probe test system.


## 3.1. Thickness and Structure Analysis

### 3.1.1. Thickness of ZnS Film

In order to better understand the results or discussion, the samples were named after the sputtering pressure and hydrogen partial pressure ratios that are listed in Table1. The film thickness is shown in Figure 1. From Figure 1 we can see that the samples deposited at 0.2 Pa are thicker than those grown at 0.5 Pa. It is easy to understand because higher sputtering pressure means higher density of gas molecules, which would enhance the probability of colliding which occurred between gas molecules and sputtering particles. The colliding decreases the deposition rate of ZnS films by changing the direction of sputtering particles away from the substrates. With the increase of hydrogen, the film thickness increased at first and then decreased.Table 1
Sample names of ZnS thin films deposited in different sputtering atmosphere.
Pressure
0.5 Pa
0.2 Pa
Ar/H2 ratio
25 : 0
25 : 1
25 : 2
25 : 3
25 : 0
25 : 1
25 : 2
25 : 3
Sample name
0.5P-Ar
0.5P-H
0.5P-2H
0.5P-3H
0.2P-Ar
0.2P-H
0.2P-2H
0.2P-3HFigure 1
Thickness of the ZnS thin films deposited at varied sputtering atmosphere.It means that the amount of hydrogen had an impact on the deposition process of the films.


### 3.1.2. Structural Properties

X-ray diffraction patterns of the ZnS films prepared in different sputtering atmosphere are shown in Figure2. Figure 2 shows that all the ZnS films are wurtzite polycrystalline structure with a preferential orientation in (100) direction.Figure 2
XRD patterns of ZnS films grown at various atmospheres.Figure3 gives the average crystallite size (D) of different ZnS films, which is calculated using Scherrer formula:
(1)
D
=
K
λ
β
cos
⁡
θ
,
where λ is the X-ray wavelength (1.5405 nm), β is the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the film diffraction peak in (100) direction, and θ is the Bragg diffraction angle.Figure 3
Crystal size (D) of the ZnS thin films.It is observed that theD values of the films deposited at 0.2 Pa were larger than those at 0.5 Pa except for 3/25 H2/Ar ratio. From Figure 3, we can see that the average grain size of the films increased at first and then decreased with the increase of hydrogen. This result is consistent with the SEM analysis (Figures 5 and 6). This means that lower sputtering pressure leads to larger crystal size and the increase of hydrogen partial pressure results in a larger crystal size except the sample with much hydrogen.


## 3.1.1. Thickness of ZnS Film

In order to better understand the results or discussion, the samples were named after the sputtering pressure and hydrogen partial pressure ratios that are listed in Table1. The film thickness is shown in Figure 1. From Figure 1 we can see that the samples deposited at 0.2 Pa are thicker than those grown at 0.5 Pa. It is easy to understand because higher sputtering pressure means higher density of gas molecules, which would enhance the probability of colliding which occurred between gas molecules and sputtering particles. The colliding decreases the deposition rate of ZnS films by changing the direction of sputtering particles away from the substrates. With the increase of hydrogen, the film thickness increased at first and then decreased.Table 1
Sample names of ZnS thin films deposited in different sputtering atmosphere.
Pressure
0.5 Pa
0.2 Pa
Ar/H2 ratio
25 : 0
25 : 1
25 : 2
25 : 3
25 : 0
25 : 1
25 : 2
25 : 3
Sample name
0.5P-Ar
0.5P-H
0.5P-2H
0.5P-3H
0.2P-Ar
0.2P-H
0.2P-2H
0.2P-3HFigure 1
Thickness of the ZnS thin films deposited at varied sputtering atmosphere.It means that the amount of hydrogen had an impact on the deposition process of the films.


## 3.1.2. Structural Properties

X-ray diffraction patterns of the ZnS films prepared in different sputtering atmosphere are shown in Figure2. Figure 2 shows that all the ZnS films are wurtzite polycrystalline structure with a preferential orientation in (100) direction.Figure 2
XRD patterns of ZnS films grown at various atmospheres.Figure3 gives the average crystallite size (D) of different ZnS films, which is calculated using Scherrer formula:
(1)
D
=
K
λ
β
cos
⁡
θ
,
where λ is the X-ray wavelength (1.5405 nm), β is the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the film diffraction peak in (100) direction, and θ is the Bragg diffraction angle.Figure 3
Crystal size (D) of the ZnS thin films.It is observed that theD values of the films deposited at 0.2 Pa were larger than those at 0.5 Pa except for 3/25 H2/Ar ratio. From Figure 3, we can see that the average grain size of the films increased at first and then decreased with the increase of hydrogen. This result is consistent with the SEM analysis (Figures 5 and 6). This means that lower sputtering pressure leads to larger crystal size and the increase of hydrogen partial pressure results in a larger crystal size except the sample with much hydrogen.


## 3.2. Composition

The ICP-OES measurements were done to determine the composition of ZnS films. Figure4 shows the influence of H2/Ar ratio on film compositions. All samples prepared in various sputtering atmospheres were nonstoichiometric, and Zn had more content than S. The Zn/S ratio decreased obviously as the H2/Ar ratios were elevated. Figure 4 also shows that the Zn/S ratios of the films at 0.2 Pa were closer to 1 : 1 compared to the samples at 0.5 Pa except the one with 2/25 H2/Ar ratio.Figure 4
Zn/S ratio of ZnS films deposited in various atmospheres.SEM images of ZnS films grown in various atmospheres. (a) 0.5P-Ar, (b) 0.5P-H, (c) 0.5P-2H, and (d) 0.5P-3H.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)SEM images of ZnS films grown in various atmospheres. (a) 0.2P-Ar, (b) 0.2P-H, (c) 0.2P-2H, and (d) 0.2P-3H.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)It means that lower sputtering pressure results in a better stoichiometry and the introduction of hydrogen leads to a near stoichiometry of Zn/S ratio. But the upper limit of H2/Ar ratio was chosen to be 3 : 25 because higher content of hydrogen decreases the grain size of ZnS films (Figure 6(d)) and may cause hydrogen doping [17] although it leads to stoichiometric composition of films.It is difficult to have a good understanding of the mechanism how hydrogen leads to a better Zn/S ratio. But we try to understand it as follows. Zinc oxide film was obtained only or cannot be avoided until the well optimization of sputtering conditions during the ZnS deposition. The sputtering particles bombarded out from ZnS target by argon ions, such asZn
2
+, S
2
-, ZnS, and molecular clusters, would present strong oxidability or reducibility caused by the small size effect. On the other hand, it is difficult to keep all the oxygen away from the vacuum chamber. Even a small amount of oxygen can result in the redox reaction and the growth of zinc oxide film on the substrate instead of ZnS film. Thus, hydrogen was introduced to prevent the sputtering particles from oxidation by maintaining a reducing protective atmosphere. This idea was supported because a small amount of hydrogen sulfide was smelled when the vacuum chamber was just open after deposition and there was some yellow elemental sulfide found at the surface of ZnS target. These results demonstrated that hydrogen indeed had the effect of reduction during the magnetron sputtering process.


## 3.3. Surface Morphology

Figures5 and 6 show the surface morphology of the ZnS films scanned by SEM. Figure 5 shows the morphology of the films deposited at 0.5 Pa with different H2/Ar ratio. Figure 6 shows the morphology of the films deposited at 0.2 Pa with different H2/Ar ratio. In general, the surface of the ZnS films is smooth and compact with uniform particles.From Figures5 and 6, we know that the surface morphology of ZnS films deposited at different atmospheres has no obvious difference except the particle sizes. The change of grain size in SEM images is small and not easy to find out while it can be clearly differentiated by crystal size calculated from XRD peak. In Figure 6, the SEM images of 0.2P-H and 0.2P-2H show the larger grain size and clear grain boundary while the images of 0.2P-Ar and 0.2P-3H show the small crystal size, corresponding to the variation of crystal size in Figure 3.These images indicate that ZnS films deposited at 0.2 Pa have better crystallinity and hydrogen can promote the crystal size of the film to some extent. This may be explained by the dynamic equilibrium between surface enhanced diffusion and selective etching effect of hydrogen. There is a plasma area produced by the RF power during the process of RF magnetron sputtering. In the plasma area, there are some important reactions [18]:
(2)
H
2
*
*
+
H
2
*
⟶
H
2
+
+
H
2
+
e
which shows the excitation transfer and radioactive decay process of excited hydrogen:
(3)
H
2
+
+
H
2
⟶
H
3
+
+
H
Ar
+
+
H
2
⟶
ArH
+
+
H
which shows the generation process of ArH
+, H
3
+, and hydrogen radical (H).Hydrogen radical leads to surface diffusion effect [19–21] and selective etching effect [21, 22] in a-Si:H, μc-Si:H, or c-Si:H deposition. Surface diffusion effect is conducive to grain growth and selective etching effect not only makes the film surface smooth but also leads to small grain, corresponding to the results in Figures 3, 5, and 6. The effects of hydrogen on the morphology of ZnS films were similar to those of a-Si:H, μc-Si:H, or c-Si:H. But further study such as molecular dynamics simulations, infrared spectroscopy, and other means may be put into use to have a better understanding in this respect.


## 3.4. Optical and Electrical Properties

The optical transmittance spectra of ZnS thin films in the wavelength range of 300 to 500 nm are shown in Figure7. It shows an obvious difference in the absorption edge of films with and without hydrogen and little difference between 0.5 and 0.2 Pa. The absorption edge of samples with hydrogen is about 30 nm short wavelength shift compared with those without hydrogen.Figure 7
Transmittance versus wavelength spectra of ZnS films grown at various sputtering pressures.Table2 lists the optical band gap (E
g) of the above ZnS films. The optical band gaps were calculated from the following expression by assuming a direct transition between valance and conduction bands:
(4)
(
α
h
ν
)
2
=
D
(
h
ν
-
E
g
)
,
whereD is a constant,h is Planck’s constant, and α is the optical absorption coefficient. E
g can be estimated by extrapolating the straight-line portion of the spectrum to a zero absorption coefficient value. In Table 2, the band gaps of the films in pure Ar are 3.24 eV and 3.25 eV, respectively. The band gaps of the films in Ar+H2 are all about 3.48 eV. It means that the existence of hydrogen had a big influence on the optical band gaps of ZnS films grown by RF magnetron sputtering. But it seems that the amount of hydrogen has not made obvious influence on the band gap of films.Table 2
The optical band gaps of the films deposited in various sputtering atmospheres.
Sample name
Band gap (eV)
0.5P-Ar
3.24
0.5P-H
3.48
0.5P-2H
3.46
0.5P-3H
3.48
0.2P-Ar
3.25
0.2P-H
3.47
0.2P-2H
3.50
0.2P-3H
3.50The resistivity of all ZnS films was measured to be in the magnitude of 105~106 Ω·cm and the conduction type could not be obtained by thermal probe test system.


## 4. Conclusions

Zinc sulfide thin films were deposited at different atmosphere and pressures. The films show wurtzite polycrystalline structure with (111) preferred orientation. It is observed that relatively lower sputtering pressure at 0.2 Pa leads to larger grain size and higher deposition rate of the ZnS thin films. Hydrogen plays a very important role in the deposition of ZnS films and would lead to better crystallinity and larger crystallite size and band gap of the films. The band gaps of the films in Ar+H2 are around 3.48 eV. It is also demonstrated that hydrogen can result in a better stoichiometric composition of the films. The resistivity of ZnS films prepared was high about 105~6 Ω·cm.



---

*Source: 720560-2014-04-07.xml*