# Efficient Removal of 2,4-DCP by Nano Zero-Valent Iron-Reduced Graphene Oxide: Statistical Modeling and Process Optimization Using RSM-BBD Approach

Authors: Qi Jing; Shuo Qiao; Wenyu Xiao; Le Tong; Zhongyu Ren
Journal: Adsorption Science & Technology
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

In this study, nano zero-valent iron-reduced graphene oxide (NZVI-rGO) composites were synthesized to remove 2,4-dichlorophenol (2,4-DCP) as an efficient adsorbent. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) indicated that NZVI particles were successfully loaded and dispersed uniformly on rGO nanosheets. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis showed that the interaction between NZVI-rGO and 2,4-DCP promoted the adsorption process. A three-level, four-factor Box-Behnken design (BBD) of the response surface methodology (RSM) was used to optimize the influencing factors including NZVI-rGO dosage, 2,4-DCP initial concentration, reaction time and initial pH. A statistically significant, well-fitting quadratic regression model was successfully constructed to predict 2,4-DCP removal rate. The highF value (15.95), very low P value (<0.0001), nonsignificant lack of fit, and appropriate coefficient of determination (R2=0.941) demonstrate a good correlation between the experimental and predicted values of the proposed model. The analyses of variance reveal that NZVI-rGO dosage and reaction time have a positive effect on 2,4-DCP removal, whereas the increase of contaminant concentration and initial pH inhibit the removal, whereas the effect of contaminant concentration and initial pH is in reverse, where the change of NZVI-rGO dosage has the greatest effect. The optimum condition is1.215 g/L of NZVI-rGO dosage, 20.856 mg/L of 2,4-DCP concentration, 4.115 of pH, and 8.157 min of reaction time. It is verified by parallel experiments under the optimum condition, achieving the removal efficiency of100%.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

According to recent studies, it is apparent that polluted water is widespread in cities, rural areas, and even in the ocean. Chlorophenols, as an important organic intermediate, are widely used in the synthesis of dyes, leather, fungicides, wood preservatives and phenolic resins, leading to extensive distribution in the aquatic environment [1, 2]. Only a small part of refractory organic matters can be converted into slightly toxic or nontoxic substances by natural degradation, and the rest will migrate in soil and water by volatilization, leaching, and adsorption, posing a continuous threat to human health [3]. The presence of 2,4-DCP (a typical chlorophenol contaminant) in the aquatic environment has attracted the attention of researchers because of its carcinogenic, mutagenic, and hardly biodegradable property [4].In previous studies, many methods such as adsorption [5], advanced oxidation [6], and photocatalysis [7] have been developed to remove 2,4-DCP. Nano zero-valent iron (NZVI) has been extensively used in the removal of heavy metals [8], dyes [9], antibiotics [10], and various mixed pollutants [11] since it possess excellent properties such as large specific surface area, strong reducibility, and high reactivity [12]. However, there are still some limits of NZVI which affect its large-scale application in practice. Besides the tendency of aggregation caused by magnetic interaction among particles and nanosize effect [13], there is another side that NZVI particles are easy to oxidize when exposed to air [14], which also restrict its application. To overcome these limits, the most common solution adopted is to find apposite modification methods to stabilize and improve dispersion of NZVI particles [15]. Reduced graphene oxide (rGO), a carbon material that has been developed in recent years, is proved to be effective and promising for the contaminant removal from aqueous media due to its large theoretical specific surface area, extraordinary electrical conductivity, and high surface free-energy [16]. Over the past years, various functionalized graphene materials are used in the field of pollutant removal. For example, synthesizing the composite of graphene and metal materials to remove organic dyes [17], phenolic compounds [18], or explosives [19], combining graphene with polymer to remove heavy metal ions [20] and excessive micronutrient [21], doping with certain elements to remove nitrate [22].Response surface methodology (RSM), as a statistical and mathematical tool, is used to optimize various factors and estimate the interaction between influencing factors with a limited number of experiments [23]. Selecting an appropriate design strategy has a substantial influence on the precision of the predicted model, such as full factorial design (FFD), central composite design (CCD), and Box-Behnken design (BBD). Unlike CCD that explores a wider range of variables [24], the main advantage of the BBD is to avoid experiments performed under extreme conditions. In this work, the experimental range of independent variables has been determined in advance by batch experiments, so it is not rather necessary to discuss the situation where all factors take extreme values. Finally, RSM based on Box-Behnken design was chosen to construct an experimental model. The independent variables in this study were a dosage of NZVI-rGO, initial 2,4-DCP concentration, reaction time, and initial pH, considering the removal rate of 2,4-DCP as a response value.In recent years, several studies have confirmed the better efficiency of removing pollutants by NZVI supported on graphene (NZVI-rGO) compared to bare NZVI [25, 26], but there are no researchers that have applied it on the removal of 2,4-DCP. Due to the interaction between NZVI-rGO and 2,4-DCP and the strong adsorption capacity brought by the huge specific surface area of rGO, NZVI-rGO was synthesized to improve the dispersion of nanoparticles and applied for removing 2,4-DCP from the aqueous solution. In this work, the interaction between the factors affecting the removal process is analyzed and the removal behavior is optimized by using RSM-BBD design with considerably less experimental runs. The main aims of this study are (1) to successfully synthesize NZVI-rGO composites and to be characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR); (2) to apply a four factor, three-level Box-Behnken experimental design to estimate the influence of factors and their interactions on the removal of 2,4-DCP; and (3) to test the validity of the constructed model by a set of parallel experiments in the experimental domain.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials and Instruments

Graphite powder was purchased from Tianjin Guangfu Fine Chemical Industry to prepare graphene oxide (GO). Acid reagents, such as concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4, 98%) and hydrochloric acid (HCl, 38%), were obtained from Hengfeng Chemical Co., Ltd. Potassium permanganate (KMnO4, Laiyang Fine Chemicals), ferrous sulfate (FeSO4·7H2O, Aladdin), sodium nitrate (NaNO3, Aladdin), sodium borohydride (NaBH4, Aladdin), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, Aladdin), 2,4-dichlorophenol, (2,4-DCP, Macklin biochemical Co., Ltd., GC, >99.7%), and sodium hydroxide (NaOH, Beijing Chemical Works) were all analytical grade. In addition, all solutions used in the experiment were prepared with deionized (DI) water from a MX Milli Q system (Fly science, SIM-T30UV).The concentration of residual 2,4-DCP in a reaction solution was determined by the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, Shimadzu, LC-2030). The parameters for determination of 2,4-DCP concentration are as follows: liquid phase ratio of methanol-water (60 : 40), flow rate 1 mL/min, retention time 13.5 min, injection volume 20μL, and maximum absorption wavelength of 2,4-DCP 280 nm.


### 2.2. Synthesis of NZVI-rGO

GO is prepared from graphite powder by modified Hummer’s method under the strong oxidation of KMnO4 and H2SO4 [27]. As the reaction temperature and time of the second stage are primary factors in the synthesis process, they are assigned to35°C and two hours, respectively. In order to exfoliate GO into nanosheets, 1 g GO was dissolved in 200 mL DI water and decomposed by ultrasonic cell crusher (Biosafer, 900-92) for10 min, then ultrasonicated by water bath for 2 hours. Transfer the above suspension and 50 mL aqueous solution containing 2.482 g FeSO4·7H2O to a three-necked flask. Fe2+and GO were reduced to form NZVI-rGO under the strong reducibility of NaBH4 solution (4.675 g/50 mL) which was dropwise added into the flask at room temperature, and the mixture was continuously stirred for 1 h under N2 protection to ensure the anaerobic condition. The prepared products were collected by vacuum filtration and washed 2-3 times with DI water. Finally, the black solid was vacuum freeze dried for further use.


### 2.3. Characterization

The morphology and elemental composition of samples were characterized by using SEM (JSM-7900F, JEOL Ltd., Japan). XRD (Bruker D8 Advance, Germany) with a Cu–Kα excitation source is used to investigate the phase composition and crystal structure of NZVI-rGO at 40 kV and 40 mA. The pattern was obtained from 5° to 90°, and the scanning rate was set at about 5° of 2θ/min. Additionally, the functional groups and chemical bonds of the samples were analyzed by FTIR (IRAffinity-1S, Shimadzu, Japan).


### 2.4. Experimental Design

All experiments were carried out in a water-bath oscillator at a speed of 200 r/min. The experimental range of independent variables was determined by batch experiments (Fig.S1). Water samples were injected into the headspace bottle via 0.45 μm polyethersulfone membrane (PES, Tianjin Jinteng) and sampled at a specific time. The 2,4-DCP removal rate is calculated using Equation (1).
(1)2,4−DCPRemovalrate%=C0−CTC0×100%,where C0 and CT (mg/L) represent the initial 2,4-DCP concentration and the 2,4-DCP concentration at time t (min), respectively. In this study, the RSM based on Box-Behnken design (RSM-BBD) was applied to analyze the independent variables and their interactions. An aquadratic mathematical model was established to optimize the reaction process for removal and achieve the optimum response.The selected variables (NZVI-rGO dosage (A; g/L), 2,4-DCP initial concentration (B; mg/L), reaction time (C; min), initial pH (D) with their limits for 2,4-DCP removal are given in Table 1. Table 2 shows the design matrix including twenty-four factorial points and five replicates of the central points. The quadratic response model for variables can be described as the following general second-order polynomial equation.
(2)Y=α0+α1A+α2B+α3C+α4D+α12AB+α13AC+α14AD+α23BC+α24BD+α34CD+α11A2+α22B2+α33C2+α44D2,Table 1
Independent variables and experimental level in this study.
Independent variableFactorsExperimental levelLow (-1)Middle (0)High (+1)Dosage (g/L)A0.51.01.5Concentration (mg/L)B102540Reaction time (min)C15.510pHD3711Table 2
Design matrix with experimental results and predicted values.
RunABCDExperimentalPredictedg/Lmg/LminpH%%1-1-10036.7338.452-10-1050.4453.543-100-19.086.104-100135.3136.125-10109.466.526-110018.8819.1770-1-1090.1186.0480-10-134.9731.7890-10185.4683.65100-11039.7747.221100-1-137.3942.811200-1190.7891.0313000078.1771.8414000073.1171.8415000069.8571.8416000072.4471.8417000065.6171.8418001-118.0818.0119001146.5641.322001-1059.9663.1921010-135.6726.6122010153.9346.2523011012.7527.51241-10086.9786.872510-1098.1390.1926100-136.9046.7827100174.6188.2828101076.6762.7029110065.1263.58whereY is the predicted removal rate of 2,4-DCP; A, B, C, and D represent independent variables; α0 is the constant offset term; αi are linear coefficients; αii are quadratic coefficients; and αij represent the interaction coefficients. The absolute value of α can reflect the intensity of the influence on the 2,4-DCP removal rate.The abovementioned BBD experimental design scheme and subsequent statistical analysis, such asF-test, ANOVA analysis, and residuals analysis, are all obtained by Design expert 12 (version 12.0.3.0).


## 2.1. Materials and Instruments

Graphite powder was purchased from Tianjin Guangfu Fine Chemical Industry to prepare graphene oxide (GO). Acid reagents, such as concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4, 98%) and hydrochloric acid (HCl, 38%), were obtained from Hengfeng Chemical Co., Ltd. Potassium permanganate (KMnO4, Laiyang Fine Chemicals), ferrous sulfate (FeSO4·7H2O, Aladdin), sodium nitrate (NaNO3, Aladdin), sodium borohydride (NaBH4, Aladdin), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, Aladdin), 2,4-dichlorophenol, (2,4-DCP, Macklin biochemical Co., Ltd., GC, >99.7%), and sodium hydroxide (NaOH, Beijing Chemical Works) were all analytical grade. In addition, all solutions used in the experiment were prepared with deionized (DI) water from a MX Milli Q system (Fly science, SIM-T30UV).The concentration of residual 2,4-DCP in a reaction solution was determined by the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, Shimadzu, LC-2030). The parameters for determination of 2,4-DCP concentration are as follows: liquid phase ratio of methanol-water (60 : 40), flow rate 1 mL/min, retention time 13.5 min, injection volume 20μL, and maximum absorption wavelength of 2,4-DCP 280 nm.


## 2.2. Synthesis of NZVI-rGO

GO is prepared from graphite powder by modified Hummer’s method under the strong oxidation of KMnO4 and H2SO4 [27]. As the reaction temperature and time of the second stage are primary factors in the synthesis process, they are assigned to35°C and two hours, respectively. In order to exfoliate GO into nanosheets, 1 g GO was dissolved in 200 mL DI water and decomposed by ultrasonic cell crusher (Biosafer, 900-92) for10 min, then ultrasonicated by water bath for 2 hours. Transfer the above suspension and 50 mL aqueous solution containing 2.482 g FeSO4·7H2O to a three-necked flask. Fe2+and GO were reduced to form NZVI-rGO under the strong reducibility of NaBH4 solution (4.675 g/50 mL) which was dropwise added into the flask at room temperature, and the mixture was continuously stirred for 1 h under N2 protection to ensure the anaerobic condition. The prepared products were collected by vacuum filtration and washed 2-3 times with DI water. Finally, the black solid was vacuum freeze dried for further use.


## 2.3. Characterization

The morphology and elemental composition of samples were characterized by using SEM (JSM-7900F, JEOL Ltd., Japan). XRD (Bruker D8 Advance, Germany) with a Cu–Kα excitation source is used to investigate the phase composition and crystal structure of NZVI-rGO at 40 kV and 40 mA. The pattern was obtained from 5° to 90°, and the scanning rate was set at about 5° of 2θ/min. Additionally, the functional groups and chemical bonds of the samples were analyzed by FTIR (IRAffinity-1S, Shimadzu, Japan).


## 2.4. Experimental Design

All experiments were carried out in a water-bath oscillator at a speed of 200 r/min. The experimental range of independent variables was determined by batch experiments (Fig.S1). Water samples were injected into the headspace bottle via 0.45 μm polyethersulfone membrane (PES, Tianjin Jinteng) and sampled at a specific time. The 2,4-DCP removal rate is calculated using Equation (1).
(1)2,4−DCPRemovalrate%=C0−CTC0×100%,where C0 and CT (mg/L) represent the initial 2,4-DCP concentration and the 2,4-DCP concentration at time t (min), respectively. In this study, the RSM based on Box-Behnken design (RSM-BBD) was applied to analyze the independent variables and their interactions. An aquadratic mathematical model was established to optimize the reaction process for removal and achieve the optimum response.The selected variables (NZVI-rGO dosage (A; g/L), 2,4-DCP initial concentration (B; mg/L), reaction time (C; min), initial pH (D) with their limits for 2,4-DCP removal are given in Table 1. Table 2 shows the design matrix including twenty-four factorial points and five replicates of the central points. The quadratic response model for variables can be described as the following general second-order polynomial equation.
(2)Y=α0+α1A+α2B+α3C+α4D+α12AB+α13AC+α14AD+α23BC+α24BD+α34CD+α11A2+α22B2+α33C2+α44D2,Table 1
Independent variables and experimental level in this study.
Independent variableFactorsExperimental levelLow (-1)Middle (0)High (+1)Dosage (g/L)A0.51.01.5Concentration (mg/L)B102540Reaction time (min)C15.510pHD3711Table 2
Design matrix with experimental results and predicted values.
RunABCDExperimentalPredictedg/Lmg/LminpH%%1-1-10036.7338.452-10-1050.4453.543-100-19.086.104-100135.3136.125-10109.466.526-110018.8819.1770-1-1090.1186.0480-10-134.9731.7890-10185.4683.65100-11039.7747.221100-1-137.3942.811200-1190.7891.0313000078.1771.8414000073.1171.8415000069.8571.8416000072.4471.8417000065.6171.8418001-118.0818.0119001146.5641.322001-1059.9663.1921010-135.6726.6122010153.9346.2523011012.7527.51241-10086.9786.872510-1098.1390.1926100-136.9046.7827100174.6188.2828101076.6762.7029110065.1263.58whereY is the predicted removal rate of 2,4-DCP; A, B, C, and D represent independent variables; α0 is the constant offset term; αi are linear coefficients; αii are quadratic coefficients; and αij represent the interaction coefficients. The absolute value of α can reflect the intensity of the influence on the 2,4-DCP removal rate.The abovementioned BBD experimental design scheme and subsequent statistical analysis, such asF-test, ANOVA analysis, and residuals analysis, are all obtained by Design expert 12 (version 12.0.3.0).


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Characterization

Figure1 demonstrates the structure and surface morphology of the bare NZVI and NZVI-rGO by using SEM. Figure 1(a) shows that the spherical bare NZVI particles randomly connect to each other forming a larger aggregate, which is the essential reason for the decrease of reaction activity, whereas it can easily note that NZVI particles adhere to rGO nanosheets are in a monodisperse state (Figure 1(b)). In addition, it can be found that the particle size of NZVI in NZVI-rGO composites all range from 120 to 150 nm and most of them are around 130 nm. In Figure 1(a), the size distribution of NZVI is extremely nonuniform, some are less than 50 nm, and some even exceed 200 nm, as a result of van der Waals force and magnetic interaction between NZVI particles [28]. These observations imply that rGO can significantly decrease the aggregation of NZVI, thus achieving a relatively large surface area (Text S1), so as to avoid the rapid oxidation of nanoparticles.Figure 1
SEM images of (a) bare NZVI and (b) NZVI-rGO.
(a)(b)Figure2 shows the XRD pattern of NZVI-rGO, where a broad peak at 25.01° is attributed to the (002) crystalline plane of rGO and the corresponding interlayer spacing of it is about 0.357 nm as calculated from the Bragg’s equation, which is less than the layer spacing of GO reported by Luo et al. [29] owing to the removal of the oxygen-containing functional groups from the carbon sheets. There is an intense and sharp diffraction peak at 44.67° corresponding to the (110) plane in the lattice of NZVI-rGO suggesting successfulreduction of Fe2+ by NaBH4. The weak intensity peak at 35.1° is assigned to (311) reflecting Fe3O4 crystal facet due to the surface oxidation of NZVI particles [30].Figure 2
XRD pattern of NZVI-rGO.Figure3 is FTIR spectra of GO and NZVI-rGO describing typical peaks related to different oxygen-containing functional groups. For GO, an intense and broad peak at around 3415 cm−1 corresponds to the stretching vibration of O–H groups [19]. The characteristic absorption peaks at 1733, 1622, 1404, and 1043 cm-1 are attributed to the stretching vibration of C=O (carboxylic acid and carbonyl moieties), aromatic C=C, carboxy O=C–O, and alkoxy C–O, respectively [19, 31, 32]. It can be observed that the C=O vibration band disappears in NZVI-rGO, and the O-H, carboxy O=C–O and C-O stretching bands are retained but weaken, which is due to the removal of partial of the oxygen-containing functional groups. The 2,4-DCP with aromatic structure presents good adsorption affinities to the benzene rings of rGO by π-π interaction [33]. The hydrogen bond between 2,4-DCP and O-H groups of the remaining oxygen-containing functional groups also promote the adsorption process [34]. The epoxy C=O stretching vibration (1172 cm-1) becomes relatively more obvious due to the decrease of the other oxygen-containing functional groups [31]. In addition, the small vibration observed around 2376 cm−1 could ascribe to the CO2 in the environment [35]. Finally, the weak band at 675 cm−1 could be assigned to Fe-O stretching vibrations from Fe3O4 nanoparticles [36], which is consistent with the XRD results. These phenomena were in accord with a report by Xing et al. [37], further confirming the successful synthesis of NZVI-rGO. The possible adsorption mechanisms for 2,4-DCP by NZVI-rGO are hydrogen bonding and π-π interaction, as illustrated in Figure 4.Figure 3
FTIR spectra of the GO andNZVI-rGO.Figure 4
The possible removal mechanisms 2,4-DCP by NZVI-rGO.


### 3.2. Response Surface Model Fitting and Variance Analysis

Table2 exhibits the experimental matrix designed by RSM with the corresponding experimental results and predicted values for 2,4-DCP removal efficiency (%). According to the results, a second-order polynomial equation, which expresses the relationship between the removal efficiency of 2,4-DCP and the four independent variables, can be expressed as follows:
(3)Y=71.84+23.21A−10.64B+17.88C−18.63D−1.00AB+2.87AC+4.88AD−8.06BC+0.78BD−6.23CD−11.29A2−8.53B2−16.23C2−7.31D2.The influence of the variables on the response value can be indicated by “+” (positive relationship between the predicted removal rate and independent variable) and “-” (negative effect between the two above). For the real wastewater with a certain contaminant concentration (factorB) and pH (factor D), the quadratic polynomial equation (Equation (3)) can be used to predict the optimal dosage, so as to save the cost under the condition of meeting the water quality requirements.ANOVA is a statistical technique which can be used to validate the adequacy of the model developed and the significance of each variable.R2, as a coefficient to measure the correlation of regression equation, should be 0<R2<1, and the larger values mean the better results. A relatively high value of the R2 (R2=0.9410) and adjusted R2 value (Adj R2=0.8820) were obtained which indicates that the statistical prediction is an approach to the experimental results. Besides, the Adeq Precision (the ratio of the predicted value to the average prediction error) is 12.905 (>4) also confirms that the model has high reliability and precision [38].F value enhances with the increase of the sum of squares (SS), which implies the significance. of related variables [39]. As revealed from Table 3, the significant F value (15.95) and the insignificant value of lack of fit (0.0646) for the quadratic mode prove that the selected model is sufficient to interpret the 2,4-DCP removal process. In addition, P values less than 0.05 are also very relevant to prove that the corresponding terms have a significant impact on the 2,4-DCP removal rate. So, it can be concluded that each single factor and the square term of the dose, pollutant concentration, and reaction time have a significant impact. The percent contribution (PC) of each item based on the SS value of the corresponding term (Table 4) and formula are as follows:
(4)PC=SS∑SS×100.Table 3
ANOVA of the response surface for the quadratic model.
SourceSum of squaresDFMean squareF valueP value (Prob>F)Model18693.01141335.2215.95<0.0001SignificantA (dosage)6463.5216463.5277.19<0.0001B (concentration)1358.9411358.9416.230.0012C (reaction time)3836.3313836.3345.82<0.0001D (initial pH)4163.4314163.4349.72<0.0001AB4.0014.000.04780.8301AC32.95132.950.39350.5406AD95.26195.261.140.3042BC259.691259.693.100.1000BD2.4512.450.02930.8666CD155.131155.131.850.1950A2826.201826.209.870.0072B2472.341472.345.640.0324C21708.8211708.8220.410.0005D2346.701346.704.140.0613Residual1172.241483.73Lack of fit1087.4310108.745.130.0646Not significantPure error84.81421.20Cor total19865.2528Table 4
Multiple regression consequence of the terms for the quadratic model.
FactorCoefficient estimateEffectSum of squaresPCIntercept71.84A dosage23.2127.306463.5232.77B concentration-10.645.741358.946.89C reaction time17.8816.203836.3319.45D pH-18.6317.594163.4321.11AB-1.00000.054.000.02AC2.870.4232.950.17AD4.881.2195.260.48BC-8.063.29259.691.32BD0.78250.032.450.01CD-6.231.97155.130.79A2-11.296.46826.204.19B2-8.533.69472.342.39C2-16.2313.351708.828.66D2-7.312.71346.701.76According to the calculation results, the NZVI-rGO dosage shows the most apparent significance with PC near 33and the order of the variable’s influence on the removal rate is NZVI-rGO dosage>initial pH>reaction time>2,4-DCP initial concentration.Figure5 shows the Pareto graphic analysis which is a method to calculate the percentage influence of each term on the basis of Equation (5) and provides more significant information to explain the results.
(5)Pi=αi2∑αi2×100.Figure 5
Diagram of Pareto graphic analysis.As can be obtained from the Figure5, dosage (α1, 27.30%), pH (α4, 17.59%), and reaction time (α3, 16.20%), the quadratic effect of reaction time (α33, 13.35%) produce the main effect on the removal of 2,4-DCP.


### 3.3. Residual Analysis

To further verify whether the selected model is adequate, the distribution of residuals, predicted values, and actual values are analyzed. Residual analysis is carried out by the virtue of graphic analysis tools, which can be used for the diagnosis of the response surface optimization model [40].Analyzing the normal plot of residual is an effective way to test the degree of the model fitting. Figure6(a) depicts the predicted normal residual diagram in which the data points are positioned near an inclined straight line illustrating the residuals have a normal distribution. Figure 6(b) exhibits the studentized residual corresponding to the predicted 2,4-DCP removal efficiency. If the obtained model is reasonable, there should be no evident relativity among the residual and predicted 2,4-DCP removal efficiency [41]. The random distribution of the residuals relative to the zero line indicates that the model is credible. The corresponding residuals of each chronological experiment (shown in Table 2) are presented in Figure 6(c). It is found that the residual diagram does not show any specific trend or pattern, which indicates that the hypothesis of experimental conditions is independent guarantying the validity of the experiment [42]. Finally, as shown in Figure 6(d), the outputs calculated by the model are very close to actual 2,4-DCP removal rate signifying the consistency between the two. Therefore, the response surface method has a high degree of confidence in optimizing 2,4-DCP removal from water by NZVI-rGO.Figure 6
Residual plots for 2,4-DCP removal efficiency by NZVI-rGO. (a) Residuals’ normal possibility diagram. (b) Diagram of the residuals based on the predicted value. (c) Chronological diagram of the residuals. (d) Scatter plot of the predicted and actual values.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


### 3.4. 3D Response Surface Plots

Figure7 is the 3D response surface plot which is employed to illustrate the relative influence of two tested variables on the 2,4-DCP removal efficiency while the other two were fixed at the central level. The effects of these factors on the removal of 2,4-DCP are explained via statistical analysis to fit the model and obtain the optimum removal condition.Figure 7
The 3D response surface plots for the (a) dosage and initial concentration, (b) dosage and reaction time, (c) initial pH and dosage, (d) initial concentration and reaction time, (e) initial concentration and initial pH, and (f) initial pH and reaction time.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)Figure7(a) represents the effect of NZVI-rGO dosage and 2,4-DCP initial concentration, when the initial pH and reaction time were fixed at 7 and 5.5 min, respectively. It is obvious that the adsorbent dosage has positive effects on the removal of 2,4-DCP, whereas the efficiency has no significant variation when the 2,4-DCP concentration is between 10 and 17.5 mg/L and then declines with the increase of concentration. The greater dosage of NZVI-rGO provides more reactive sites and greatly accelerates the transfer of pollutants, which is the key factor to determine the reaction rate which is consistent with the results of variance analysis. The response surface plot for the effect of NZVI-rGO dosage and reaction time on the removal is shown in Figure 7(b), which demonstrates that both of the two factors have a positive impact on the removal of target contaminant. The plot of 2,4-DCP removal affected by NZVI-rGO dosage and initial pH (Figure 7(c)) indicates that the removal rate decreases with the increase of pH value, which is opposite to the trend of dosage. This phenomenon may be due to the inhibition of π-π interaction and cationic-π bond between 2,4-DCP and rGO with the increase of pH value, which leads to the decrease of adsorption capacity at a higher pH value [43]. And the two factors have an evident effect on the 2,4-DCP removal being consistent with the larger F value shown in Table 3.From Figure7(d), it is found that the removal rate of 2,4-DCP exhibits a steady but slow decline as the pollutant concentration raised. In the first five minutes, there is almost no difference in the removal rate at different concentrations. With the extension of reaction time, the removal rate will increase slowly. This is due to the composites have enough active sites at the initial stage of the reaction, but when the target pollutants occupy most of the active sites, the competition for adsorption sites among pollutants will lead to the decrease of reaction rate. Finally, Figures 7(e) and 7(f) demonstrate the effect of concentration-initial pH and reaction time-initial pH under the condition that the dosage is 1.0 g/L, respectively. The influence of each factor on the response value is similar with the above results, and there is no apparent interaction between all factors.


### 3.5. Optimization of Reaction and Model Validation

Using a quadratic model to design the optimal conditions which are carried out from Derringer’s desirability function, in order to maximize the removal rate of 2,4-DCP by the nZVI-rGO, the quadratic model was used to optimize all variables within the input range. According to this method, the optimum value of each variable is predicted as dosage of 1.215 g/L, concentration of 20.856 mg/L, pH of 4.115, and reaction time of 8.157 min to reach the maximum removal rate of 100.00%. It is verified by performing three parallel experiments at selected optimum conditions and the result is 100.00%, 100.00%, and 98.73%, respectively. The average relative error between the experimental value and predicted value calculated by the model is 0.43%，which verifies the validity of the constructed model in optimization of 2,4-DCP removal process by NZVI-rGO.The adsorption capability of 2,4-DCP by NZVI-rGO and other adsorbents are exhibited in Table5. Although the adsorption capacity in this study is relatively low, it has great advantage in shortening the reaction time.Table 5
Comparison of the adsorption capacities for 2,4-DCP onto various materials.
AdsorbentDosage (g/L)Qe (mg/g)Reaction time (min)ReferencesNZVI-rGO1.21517.178.157This articleActivated carbon10.0022.20360[44]Maize cob activated carbons2.0017.94120[1]MRGO0.50100.0010[33]Bent-nZVI/CTMAB1.0032.5760[45]CNT/PI0.40506200[46]


## 3.1. Characterization

Figure1 demonstrates the structure and surface morphology of the bare NZVI and NZVI-rGO by using SEM. Figure 1(a) shows that the spherical bare NZVI particles randomly connect to each other forming a larger aggregate, which is the essential reason for the decrease of reaction activity, whereas it can easily note that NZVI particles adhere to rGO nanosheets are in a monodisperse state (Figure 1(b)). In addition, it can be found that the particle size of NZVI in NZVI-rGO composites all range from 120 to 150 nm and most of them are around 130 nm. In Figure 1(a), the size distribution of NZVI is extremely nonuniform, some are less than 50 nm, and some even exceed 200 nm, as a result of van der Waals force and magnetic interaction between NZVI particles [28]. These observations imply that rGO can significantly decrease the aggregation of NZVI, thus achieving a relatively large surface area (Text S1), so as to avoid the rapid oxidation of nanoparticles.Figure 1
SEM images of (a) bare NZVI and (b) NZVI-rGO.
(a)(b)Figure2 shows the XRD pattern of NZVI-rGO, where a broad peak at 25.01° is attributed to the (002) crystalline plane of rGO and the corresponding interlayer spacing of it is about 0.357 nm as calculated from the Bragg’s equation, which is less than the layer spacing of GO reported by Luo et al. [29] owing to the removal of the oxygen-containing functional groups from the carbon sheets. There is an intense and sharp diffraction peak at 44.67° corresponding to the (110) plane in the lattice of NZVI-rGO suggesting successfulreduction of Fe2+ by NaBH4. The weak intensity peak at 35.1° is assigned to (311) reflecting Fe3O4 crystal facet due to the surface oxidation of NZVI particles [30].Figure 2
XRD pattern of NZVI-rGO.Figure3 is FTIR spectra of GO and NZVI-rGO describing typical peaks related to different oxygen-containing functional groups. For GO, an intense and broad peak at around 3415 cm−1 corresponds to the stretching vibration of O–H groups [19]. The characteristic absorption peaks at 1733, 1622, 1404, and 1043 cm-1 are attributed to the stretching vibration of C=O (carboxylic acid and carbonyl moieties), aromatic C=C, carboxy O=C–O, and alkoxy C–O, respectively [19, 31, 32]. It can be observed that the C=O vibration band disappears in NZVI-rGO, and the O-H, carboxy O=C–O and C-O stretching bands are retained but weaken, which is due to the removal of partial of the oxygen-containing functional groups. The 2,4-DCP with aromatic structure presents good adsorption affinities to the benzene rings of rGO by π-π interaction [33]. The hydrogen bond between 2,4-DCP and O-H groups of the remaining oxygen-containing functional groups also promote the adsorption process [34]. The epoxy C=O stretching vibration (1172 cm-1) becomes relatively more obvious due to the decrease of the other oxygen-containing functional groups [31]. In addition, the small vibration observed around 2376 cm−1 could ascribe to the CO2 in the environment [35]. Finally, the weak band at 675 cm−1 could be assigned to Fe-O stretching vibrations from Fe3O4 nanoparticles [36], which is consistent with the XRD results. These phenomena were in accord with a report by Xing et al. [37], further confirming the successful synthesis of NZVI-rGO. The possible adsorption mechanisms for 2,4-DCP by NZVI-rGO are hydrogen bonding and π-π interaction, as illustrated in Figure 4.Figure 3
FTIR spectra of the GO andNZVI-rGO.Figure 4
The possible removal mechanisms 2,4-DCP by NZVI-rGO.


## 3.2. Response Surface Model Fitting and Variance Analysis

Table2 exhibits the experimental matrix designed by RSM with the corresponding experimental results and predicted values for 2,4-DCP removal efficiency (%). According to the results, a second-order polynomial equation, which expresses the relationship between the removal efficiency of 2,4-DCP and the four independent variables, can be expressed as follows:
(3)Y=71.84+23.21A−10.64B+17.88C−18.63D−1.00AB+2.87AC+4.88AD−8.06BC+0.78BD−6.23CD−11.29A2−8.53B2−16.23C2−7.31D2.The influence of the variables on the response value can be indicated by “+” (positive relationship between the predicted removal rate and independent variable) and “-” (negative effect between the two above). For the real wastewater with a certain contaminant concentration (factorB) and pH (factor D), the quadratic polynomial equation (Equation (3)) can be used to predict the optimal dosage, so as to save the cost under the condition of meeting the water quality requirements.ANOVA is a statistical technique which can be used to validate the adequacy of the model developed and the significance of each variable.R2, as a coefficient to measure the correlation of regression equation, should be 0<R2<1, and the larger values mean the better results. A relatively high value of the R2 (R2=0.9410) and adjusted R2 value (Adj R2=0.8820) were obtained which indicates that the statistical prediction is an approach to the experimental results. Besides, the Adeq Precision (the ratio of the predicted value to the average prediction error) is 12.905 (>4) also confirms that the model has high reliability and precision [38].F value enhances with the increase of the sum of squares (SS), which implies the significance. of related variables [39]. As revealed from Table 3, the significant F value (15.95) and the insignificant value of lack of fit (0.0646) for the quadratic mode prove that the selected model is sufficient to interpret the 2,4-DCP removal process. In addition, P values less than 0.05 are also very relevant to prove that the corresponding terms have a significant impact on the 2,4-DCP removal rate. So, it can be concluded that each single factor and the square term of the dose, pollutant concentration, and reaction time have a significant impact. The percent contribution (PC) of each item based on the SS value of the corresponding term (Table 4) and formula are as follows:
(4)PC=SS∑SS×100.Table 3
ANOVA of the response surface for the quadratic model.
SourceSum of squaresDFMean squareF valueP value (Prob>F)Model18693.01141335.2215.95<0.0001SignificantA (dosage)6463.5216463.5277.19<0.0001B (concentration)1358.9411358.9416.230.0012C (reaction time)3836.3313836.3345.82<0.0001D (initial pH)4163.4314163.4349.72<0.0001AB4.0014.000.04780.8301AC32.95132.950.39350.5406AD95.26195.261.140.3042BC259.691259.693.100.1000BD2.4512.450.02930.8666CD155.131155.131.850.1950A2826.201826.209.870.0072B2472.341472.345.640.0324C21708.8211708.8220.410.0005D2346.701346.704.140.0613Residual1172.241483.73Lack of fit1087.4310108.745.130.0646Not significantPure error84.81421.20Cor total19865.2528Table 4
Multiple regression consequence of the terms for the quadratic model.
FactorCoefficient estimateEffectSum of squaresPCIntercept71.84A dosage23.2127.306463.5232.77B concentration-10.645.741358.946.89C reaction time17.8816.203836.3319.45D pH-18.6317.594163.4321.11AB-1.00000.054.000.02AC2.870.4232.950.17AD4.881.2195.260.48BC-8.063.29259.691.32BD0.78250.032.450.01CD-6.231.97155.130.79A2-11.296.46826.204.19B2-8.533.69472.342.39C2-16.2313.351708.828.66D2-7.312.71346.701.76According to the calculation results, the NZVI-rGO dosage shows the most apparent significance with PC near 33and the order of the variable’s influence on the removal rate is NZVI-rGO dosage>initial pH>reaction time>2,4-DCP initial concentration.Figure5 shows the Pareto graphic analysis which is a method to calculate the percentage influence of each term on the basis of Equation (5) and provides more significant information to explain the results.
(5)Pi=αi2∑αi2×100.Figure 5
Diagram of Pareto graphic analysis.As can be obtained from the Figure5, dosage (α1, 27.30%), pH (α4, 17.59%), and reaction time (α3, 16.20%), the quadratic effect of reaction time (α33, 13.35%) produce the main effect on the removal of 2,4-DCP.


## 3.3. Residual Analysis

To further verify whether the selected model is adequate, the distribution of residuals, predicted values, and actual values are analyzed. Residual analysis is carried out by the virtue of graphic analysis tools, which can be used for the diagnosis of the response surface optimization model [40].Analyzing the normal plot of residual is an effective way to test the degree of the model fitting. Figure6(a) depicts the predicted normal residual diagram in which the data points are positioned near an inclined straight line illustrating the residuals have a normal distribution. Figure 6(b) exhibits the studentized residual corresponding to the predicted 2,4-DCP removal efficiency. If the obtained model is reasonable, there should be no evident relativity among the residual and predicted 2,4-DCP removal efficiency [41]. The random distribution of the residuals relative to the zero line indicates that the model is credible. The corresponding residuals of each chronological experiment (shown in Table 2) are presented in Figure 6(c). It is found that the residual diagram does not show any specific trend or pattern, which indicates that the hypothesis of experimental conditions is independent guarantying the validity of the experiment [42]. Finally, as shown in Figure 6(d), the outputs calculated by the model are very close to actual 2,4-DCP removal rate signifying the consistency between the two. Therefore, the response surface method has a high degree of confidence in optimizing 2,4-DCP removal from water by NZVI-rGO.Figure 6
Residual plots for 2,4-DCP removal efficiency by NZVI-rGO. (a) Residuals’ normal possibility diagram. (b) Diagram of the residuals based on the predicted value. (c) Chronological diagram of the residuals. (d) Scatter plot of the predicted and actual values.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


## 3.4. 3D Response Surface Plots

Figure7 is the 3D response surface plot which is employed to illustrate the relative influence of two tested variables on the 2,4-DCP removal efficiency while the other two were fixed at the central level. The effects of these factors on the removal of 2,4-DCP are explained via statistical analysis to fit the model and obtain the optimum removal condition.Figure 7
The 3D response surface plots for the (a) dosage and initial concentration, (b) dosage and reaction time, (c) initial pH and dosage, (d) initial concentration and reaction time, (e) initial concentration and initial pH, and (f) initial pH and reaction time.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)Figure7(a) represents the effect of NZVI-rGO dosage and 2,4-DCP initial concentration, when the initial pH and reaction time were fixed at 7 and 5.5 min, respectively. It is obvious that the adsorbent dosage has positive effects on the removal of 2,4-DCP, whereas the efficiency has no significant variation when the 2,4-DCP concentration is between 10 and 17.5 mg/L and then declines with the increase of concentration. The greater dosage of NZVI-rGO provides more reactive sites and greatly accelerates the transfer of pollutants, which is the key factor to determine the reaction rate which is consistent with the results of variance analysis. The response surface plot for the effect of NZVI-rGO dosage and reaction time on the removal is shown in Figure 7(b), which demonstrates that both of the two factors have a positive impact on the removal of target contaminant. The plot of 2,4-DCP removal affected by NZVI-rGO dosage and initial pH (Figure 7(c)) indicates that the removal rate decreases with the increase of pH value, which is opposite to the trend of dosage. This phenomenon may be due to the inhibition of π-π interaction and cationic-π bond between 2,4-DCP and rGO with the increase of pH value, which leads to the decrease of adsorption capacity at a higher pH value [43]. And the two factors have an evident effect on the 2,4-DCP removal being consistent with the larger F value shown in Table 3.From Figure7(d), it is found that the removal rate of 2,4-DCP exhibits a steady but slow decline as the pollutant concentration raised. In the first five minutes, there is almost no difference in the removal rate at different concentrations. With the extension of reaction time, the removal rate will increase slowly. This is due to the composites have enough active sites at the initial stage of the reaction, but when the target pollutants occupy most of the active sites, the competition for adsorption sites among pollutants will lead to the decrease of reaction rate. Finally, Figures 7(e) and 7(f) demonstrate the effect of concentration-initial pH and reaction time-initial pH under the condition that the dosage is 1.0 g/L, respectively. The influence of each factor on the response value is similar with the above results, and there is no apparent interaction between all factors.


## 3.5. Optimization of Reaction and Model Validation

Using a quadratic model to design the optimal conditions which are carried out from Derringer’s desirability function, in order to maximize the removal rate of 2,4-DCP by the nZVI-rGO, the quadratic model was used to optimize all variables within the input range. According to this method, the optimum value of each variable is predicted as dosage of 1.215 g/L, concentration of 20.856 mg/L, pH of 4.115, and reaction time of 8.157 min to reach the maximum removal rate of 100.00%. It is verified by performing three parallel experiments at selected optimum conditions and the result is 100.00%, 100.00%, and 98.73%, respectively. The average relative error between the experimental value and predicted value calculated by the model is 0.43%，which verifies the validity of the constructed model in optimization of 2,4-DCP removal process by NZVI-rGO.The adsorption capability of 2,4-DCP by NZVI-rGO and other adsorbents are exhibited in Table5. Although the adsorption capacity in this study is relatively low, it has great advantage in shortening the reaction time.Table 5
Comparison of the adsorption capacities for 2,4-DCP onto various materials.
AdsorbentDosage (g/L)Qe (mg/g)Reaction time (min)ReferencesNZVI-rGO1.21517.178.157This articleActivated carbon10.0022.20360[44]Maize cob activated carbons2.0017.94120[1]MRGO0.50100.0010[33]Bent-nZVI/CTMAB1.0032.5760[45]CNT/PI0.40506200[46]


## 4. Conclusions

In this study, NZVI-rGO was successfully synthesized and shows a brilliant ability for rapidly removing 2,4-DCP from an aqueous solution. A Box-Behnken design was applied to investigate the correlative effects of four independent variables (NZVI-rGO dosage, 2,4-DCP initial concentration, reaction time, and initial pH) on the removal efficiency of 2,4-DCP.(i)
NZVI particles are successfully supported by rGO with a relatively uniform dispersion. The adsorption process is promoted by the virtue of the hydrogen bonding between the oxygen functional groups of NZVI-rGO and 2,4-DCP,π-π interaction between 2,4-DCP and rGO, and the huge specific surface area of rGO(ii)
Analysis of the quadratic model indicates that adsorbent dosage and reaction time have positive effects on the removal efficiency of 2,4-DCP versus the negative effect of 2,4-DCP initial concentration and initial pH, and the change of NZVI-rGO dosage has the greatest effect(iii)
Analysis of variance suggests the high adequacy of the model with highF value (15.95), very low P value (<0.0001), and appropriate coefficient of determination (R2=0.941).(iv)
The optimal values of removal conditions were determined as follows: 1.215 g/L of dosage, 20.856 mg/L of 2,4-DCP initial concentration, 4.115 of initial pH, and 8.157 min of reaction time. Under this condition, the predicted removal efficiency of 2,4-DCP by NZVI-rGO reached100%, which was verified in close agreement with the parallel experimental values (100%, 100%, and 98.73%).The research findings indicate that NZVI-rGO could be considered a promising adsorbent for the fast and efficient removal of 2,4-DCP from contaminated water.



---

*Source: 7130581-2021-11-09.xml*