# Study of Carbon Nanotube-Supported Platinum  Nanocatalyst Fabricated with Sodium Formate Reducing  Agent in Ethylene Glycol Suspension

Authors: C. W. Mason; A. M. Kannan
Journal: ISRN Nanotechnology
 (2011)

---

## Abstract

A simple method to prepare a durable, low platinum-loading catalyst layer for the cathode in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell is tested and described.  Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) are functionalized with citric acid and then suspended in ethylene glycol.  Here, platinum nanoparticles (~4 nm) are loaded onto the surface of the MWCNTs after hexachloroplatinic acid is reduced by aqueous sodium formate.  A peak performance of 813 mW·cm−2 was achieved with a total membrane electrode assembly (MEA) platinum catalyst loading of 0.2 mg·cm−2 (0.1 mg·cm−2 anode/0.1 mg·cm−2 cathode), in H2/O2 (ambient pressure), at 80°C, with a Nafion 212 membrane.  Peak power density only decreased by 23% after 1500 potentials cycles (ranged from 0.1 to 1.2 V, and vice versa, with a 50 mV/s scan rate, flowing H2/N2 at  80°C).  Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images show the morphology and distribution of the platinum nanoparticles loaded onto the surface of the MWCNTs.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The use of the noble metal, platinum (Pt), as a catalyst in proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) applications has been known to be cost prohibitive.  Lowering the amount of platinum used or replacing it entirely with an alternative catalyst material are both valid means by which to overcome this issue.  Until a breakthrough is made in finding a durable, high-performance alternative catalyst material, platinum, and alloys with platinum, are still the most effective and prevalent catalyst materials used.Decreasing the amount of this costly noble metal on the cathode has been a topic of significant interest for many years now, as it is well known that the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) proceeds at a relatively slow rate [1].  By improving the utilization of platinum, its usage is minimized, and performance is improved.  In the catalyst layer, this can be accomplished by better platinum particle distribution, smaller particle size, or an increase in the number of particles that are in the three-phase boundary region [2].The catalyst layer support onto which platinum nanoparticles are loaded can have a major impact upon particle distribution in particular.  Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) are one such material that can be used to promote better utilization of platinum, compared to traditionally used carbon black materials, such as Vulcan XC-72 [3].  MWCNTs possess high electrochemical stability, conductivity, surface area, and mechanical strength [4].  To load the surface of the MWCNTs with Pt nanoparticles, some form of surface modification is almost always required.  These usually fall under the category of either covalent or noncovalent modification.  Covalent modification involves surface functionalization of the CNTs with reactive functional groups [5, 6].  Noncovalent modification has also been explored for a variety of applications, as it does not involve changing the surface structure of the CNT.  Interactions of this nature between the surface of the CNT and the functional group, in these cases, can occur through hydrogen bonding, Van der Waals forces, and others [7].With regard to the commonly used covalent modification method, functional groups on the surface of the CNT, such as hydroxyl (–OH) and carboxyl (–COOH) groups, can be created with a variety of substances, usually strong, acidic oxidizing agents.  HNO3, H2SO4, HCl, and H2O2 have all been used successfully under various conditions to accomplish the functionalization process [8, 9].  Generally, methods using these chemicals require significant washing and filtering after functionalization of CNTs, while the potential for impurities to exist mixed with CNTs will still remain.  Poh et al. described a method by which aqueous citric acid was used to functionalize the CNTs without requiring a subsequent washing and filtering step [10].  Additionally, the process was shown to introduce more surface carboxyl groups to the CNTs than using HNO3/H2SO4.Noncovalent modification is an alternative method through which platinum nanoparticles can be effectively anchored to the surface of the CNTs.  Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), also known as sodium lauryl sulfate, and other similar substances can potentially be used in noncovalent modification methods.  Most notably, SDS has been used to promote homogeneous dispersion and proper Pt particle size on the surface of CNTs [11].  Additionally, SDS is capable of enabling the homogeneous dispersion of the CNTs, themselves, in a suspension [12, 13].  This can be very useful in that it can ensure the decoration of Pt nanoparticles on each on every nanotube, not just the outer surfaces of a bundle of nanotubes, which can be a hindrance to other fabrication methods using different materials.Many methods have been devised to load platinum or platinum-based alloy nanoparticles onto the surface of CNTs.  These include, but are not limited to, wet chemical impregnation [14–16], electrodeposition [17–19], colloidal [20–22], and ion exchange [23, 24].  With the exception of electrodeposition, a variety of reducing agents are used in these processes to reduce the platinum precursor to elemental platinum nanoparticles of a desired size.  Commonly used agents include sodium borohydride, formic acid, various alcohols, and flowing hydrogen gas (at elevated temperatures).  Aqueous sodium formate (HCOONa) has previously been used in the literature as a more mild, yet effective reducing agent [25].  Previous studies in our lab have also successfully used sodium formate as a reducing agent [26].In this study, the performance of Pt/MWCNT catalyst created through a wet chemical impregnation method is evaluated.  The catalyst is fabricated with citric acid or SDS functionalized MWCNTs, in ethylene glycol suspension, using aqueous sodium formate to reduce the hexachloroplatinic acid (H2PtCl6) platinum precursor to nanoparticles of the ideal, more stable 4-5 nm size [27].  Often, ethylene glycol is itself used as the reducing agent through heating to it's boiling point.  But to date, and to the knowledge of the authors of this paper, this is the first time that the sodium formate reduction process in an ethylene glycol suspension has been investigated as a means to fabricate Pt/MWCNT catalyst.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Materials

MWCNTs (OD 20–30 nm, >98% purity) were obtained from Cheaptubes Co., and Hexachloroplatinic acid (H2PtCl6·6H2O) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, ethylene glycol from VWR, citric acid from EMD, SDS (C12H25SO4Na) from Fisher Scientific, and sodium formate (HCOONa) from Spectrum Chemicals.


### 2.2. Catalyst Preparation

MWCNTs that underwent citric acid functionalization were mixed with 100 mL of deionized (DI) water and either 200 mg or 1000 mg of anhydrous citric acid.  The mixture was then sonicated for 15 minutes, followed by boiling at 350°C for half an hour, leaving dried functionalized nanotubes (F-MWCNTs).To deposit platinum, 32 mg of MWCNTs were sonicated with 20 mL of ethylene glycol until the CNTs were as well dispersed as possible, which usually took about 5 minutes, with vigorous stirring.  In some tests, SDS was added before sonication, either in the amount of 200 or 400 mg.  The solution was heated to either 60°C or 75°C.  The platinum precursor, H2PtCl6·6H2O in ethylene glycol, would then be added to the suspension in the amount of 0.8 mL at 0.05 M.  Ideally, this would yield catalyst with 20 wt % Pt.  Then, 0.8 mL of 1 M aqueous sodium formate would be added, and the suspension would be left to stir at the set temperature for about half an hour to ensure the reduction process proceeds to completion.Ethylene glycol possesses a big advantage over water when filtering and washing the catalyst after reduction of the Pt precursor.  During filtering, using a Buchner funnel, the catalyst materials stay stuck together while still allowing for easy washing with DI water.  It greatly simplifies this aspect of the fabrication process. Thus, after the reduction process is complete, the catalyst is filtered and washed with DI water and then dried at 350°C for half an hour.  At this point, the catalyst would either be tested or further treated in Argon (Ar) atmosphere at 800°C in a Thermolyne tubular furnace for 2 hours.  Table1 outlines all of the variables adjusted during the entire catalyst fabrication process, the peak power density during testing, and labels them C1 through C10.Table 1
Experimental parameters and fuel cell performance of various samples.
SampleCitric acid  (mg)Reduction temperature  (°C)800°C treatment in ArgonSDS (mg)Peak power  (mW·cm−2)C120090No—378C220070No—591C320090Yes—605C420070Yes—813C5—70No400589C6—70Yes400569C720070No400187C820070Yes400250C9—70No400561C10—70Yes400710For comparison, Pt/MWCNT catalyst was also prepared using a proven, two-phase transfer process.  Its fabrication procedure was outlined by  Lin et al. [26].  In the two graphs, it is referred to as “Pt/MWCNT—Old”.


### 2.3. Membrane Electrode Assembly Fabrication

The membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) were coated with Pt/C commercial catalyst (TKK, Japan) on the anode side and the fabricated Pt/MWCNT catalyst on the cathode side.  Catalyst ink was prepared with isopropanol and 5 wt % Du Pont Nafion dispersion (Ion Power Inc., USA).  Nafion content was set to 30 wt % of the overall dried catalyst layer weight to provide ionic conductively and extend the reaction zone.  The catalyst ink would be sprayed on a 5 cm2 area of a Du Pont Nafion 212 membrane (Ion Power Inc.), with loadings of 0.1 mg·cm−2 of Pt on both the anode and cathode.  The catalyst-coated MEA would then be vacuum dried at 70°C for 15 min before being installed in the fuel cell.


### 2.4. Evaluation

The MEA is installed into the test cell with 5 cm2 active area (Fuel Cell Technologies Inc., Albuquerque, NM, USA).  The GDLs used for testing were fabricated by a process previously described by our lab, with the carbon paper substrates courtesy of Hollingsworth and Vose [28].  Silicone-coated fabric gaskets (Product# CF1007, Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics, USA) provided sealing, with a torque of 10 N·m.  A Greenlight G50 Test Station (Hydrogenics, Canada) was used to evaluate performance with the cell operating at 80°C, 100% RH, with 200 cc/min flowing H2 and O2.  High flow rates ensured the cell was never starved for reactants.  Durability of the catalysts was examined with potential cycling from 0.1 V and 1.2 V and vice versa with a PARSTAT 2273 (AMETEK, USA) at 50 mV·s−1 scan rate and 80°C, with humidified H2/N2.


### 2.5. Characterization

Imaging of the Pt/MWCNT catalyst was performed with a Philips CM200-FEG transmission electron microscope (TEM).  This enabled direct examination of Pt particle distribution and size.


## 2.1. Materials

MWCNTs (OD 20–30 nm, >98% purity) were obtained from Cheaptubes Co., and Hexachloroplatinic acid (H2PtCl6·6H2O) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, ethylene glycol from VWR, citric acid from EMD, SDS (C12H25SO4Na) from Fisher Scientific, and sodium formate (HCOONa) from Spectrum Chemicals.


## 2.2. Catalyst Preparation

MWCNTs that underwent citric acid functionalization were mixed with 100 mL of deionized (DI) water and either 200 mg or 1000 mg of anhydrous citric acid.  The mixture was then sonicated for 15 minutes, followed by boiling at 350°C for half an hour, leaving dried functionalized nanotubes (F-MWCNTs).To deposit platinum, 32 mg of MWCNTs were sonicated with 20 mL of ethylene glycol until the CNTs were as well dispersed as possible, which usually took about 5 minutes, with vigorous stirring.  In some tests, SDS was added before sonication, either in the amount of 200 or 400 mg.  The solution was heated to either 60°C or 75°C.  The platinum precursor, H2PtCl6·6H2O in ethylene glycol, would then be added to the suspension in the amount of 0.8 mL at 0.05 M.  Ideally, this would yield catalyst with 20 wt % Pt.  Then, 0.8 mL of 1 M aqueous sodium formate would be added, and the suspension would be left to stir at the set temperature for about half an hour to ensure the reduction process proceeds to completion.Ethylene glycol possesses a big advantage over water when filtering and washing the catalyst after reduction of the Pt precursor.  During filtering, using a Buchner funnel, the catalyst materials stay stuck together while still allowing for easy washing with DI water.  It greatly simplifies this aspect of the fabrication process. Thus, after the reduction process is complete, the catalyst is filtered and washed with DI water and then dried at 350°C for half an hour.  At this point, the catalyst would either be tested or further treated in Argon (Ar) atmosphere at 800°C in a Thermolyne tubular furnace for 2 hours.  Table1 outlines all of the variables adjusted during the entire catalyst fabrication process, the peak power density during testing, and labels them C1 through C10.Table 1
Experimental parameters and fuel cell performance of various samples.
SampleCitric acid  (mg)Reduction temperature  (°C)800°C treatment in ArgonSDS (mg)Peak power  (mW·cm−2)C120090No—378C220070No—591C320090Yes—605C420070Yes—813C5—70No400589C6—70Yes400569C720070No400187C820070Yes400250C9—70No400561C10—70Yes400710For comparison, Pt/MWCNT catalyst was also prepared using a proven, two-phase transfer process.  Its fabrication procedure was outlined by  Lin et al. [26].  In the two graphs, it is referred to as “Pt/MWCNT—Old”.


## 2.3. Membrane Electrode Assembly Fabrication

The membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) were coated with Pt/C commercial catalyst (TKK, Japan) on the anode side and the fabricated Pt/MWCNT catalyst on the cathode side.  Catalyst ink was prepared with isopropanol and 5 wt % Du Pont Nafion dispersion (Ion Power Inc., USA).  Nafion content was set to 30 wt % of the overall dried catalyst layer weight to provide ionic conductively and extend the reaction zone.  The catalyst ink would be sprayed on a 5 cm2 area of a Du Pont Nafion 212 membrane (Ion Power Inc.), with loadings of 0.1 mg·cm−2 of Pt on both the anode and cathode.  The catalyst-coated MEA would then be vacuum dried at 70°C for 15 min before being installed in the fuel cell.


## 2.4. Evaluation

The MEA is installed into the test cell with 5 cm2 active area (Fuel Cell Technologies Inc., Albuquerque, NM, USA).  The GDLs used for testing were fabricated by a process previously described by our lab, with the carbon paper substrates courtesy of Hollingsworth and Vose [28].  Silicone-coated fabric gaskets (Product# CF1007, Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics, USA) provided sealing, with a torque of 10 N·m.  A Greenlight G50 Test Station (Hydrogenics, Canada) was used to evaluate performance with the cell operating at 80°C, 100% RH, with 200 cc/min flowing H2 and O2.  High flow rates ensured the cell was never starved for reactants.  Durability of the catalysts was examined with potential cycling from 0.1 V and 1.2 V and vice versa with a PARSTAT 2273 (AMETEK, USA) at 50 mV·s−1 scan rate and 80°C, with humidified H2/N2.


## 2.5. Characterization

Imaging of the Pt/MWCNT catalyst was performed with a Philips CM200-FEG transmission electron microscope (TEM).  This enabled direct examination of Pt particle distribution and size.


## 3. Results and Discussion

For the samples that were fully evaluated, fabrication and performance data is shown in Table1.  200 mg was found to be an effective amount to use in the functionalization process.  Less than that produced inconsistently functionalized nanotubes, with widely varying performance results after platinum deposition.  More than that caused significant ohmic overpotentials to be observed during catalyst evaluation in the fuel cell.The reduction temperature was also another interesting variable that was initially adjusted during this study.  The two set temperatures of 70°C and 90°C were shown to effectively produce Pt/MWCNT catalyst. Temperatures much above 90°C did not produce desirable or consistent results.  Temperatures much below 70°C were not effective at promoting the reduction of the H2PtCl6.  Using a temperature of 70°C, higher-performance samples were consistently produced, which is why this set temperature was used for a majority of the fabrication procedures.Catalysts that were fabricated were tested both before and after treatment at 800°C in inert Argon atmosphere.  This is done to remove functional groups, which would otherwise cause increased resistance in the catalyst layer.  In certain situations, though, the treatment would cause particle agglomeration, which would lend to decreased performance.Lastly, SDS was used in some of the experiments to improve dispersive properties of the MWCNTs in the ethylene glycol.  Additionally, the nonpolar covalent modification ability of SDS provides another option for anchoring platinum nanoparticles to the surface of the MWCNTs.  For comparison, SDS was used with both nanotubes that were and were not functionalized with citric acid.  A study of SDS in aqueous mediums was published by our research group in which the phenomena associated with nonpolar covalent modification were examined in more detail [29].As seen in Table1, ideal performance was observed at a reduction temperature of 70°C.  Heat treatment at 800°C consistently improved performance in all samples, except in the case of C5 and C6.  Sample C4 achieved the highest performance of all the samples tested in this study.  Yet, it is in our opinion that the use of SDS in the catalyst fabrication process has significant room left for optimization and should be able to improve upon the performance of C10.  This is in contrast to the process used with C4, which is already well optimized.The performance of the commercial reference catalyst and C4 is compared to one another in Figures1 and 2.  C4 is referred to as “Pt/MWCNTs—New,” while the catalyst prepared using an older two-phase transfer method is called “Pt/MWCNTs—Old.”  Also, note that the electrochemically active surface area for C4 (Pt/MWCNTs—New) was calculated to be 194 cm2·mg−1, while the commercial catalyst was 141 cm2·mg−1.  As you will see, the increased surface area did not translate into improved performance in the activation polarization region.  Figure 1 shows cell voltage with respect to current density, while Figure 2 shows power density with respect to current density.  As previously mentioned, the platinum loading is 0.1 mg·cm−2 on both the anode and cathode, for all samples.  It is immediately apparent upon inspection of the first graph that the overpotentials in the activation and ohmic regions are almost exactly the same for the commercial sample and the new MWCNT sample.  The difference in peak power density is mainly a result of differences in overpotentials in the concentration region.  This can likely be attributed to the improved hydrophobic properties of MWCNTs, which are well known.  These two samples both underwent durability testing using cyclic voltammetry as previously described.  This accelerates platinum dissolution and particle agglomeration in a controlled, repeatable manner.  The power density data before and after cycling is presented in Table 2.Table 2
Comparison of PEMFC peak power density durability data.
CatalystsPower density (mW·cm−2)Before cyclingAfter cyclingLoss (%)Commercial Pt/C75358722Pt/MWCNT (# C4)81362323Figure 1
Polarization data of MEAs fabricated using Pt/MWCNTs synthesized with (old) and without (new) SDS along with that of commercial Pt/C using H2/O2 at 80°C.Figure 2
Power density data of MEAs fabricated using Pt/MWCNTs synthesized with (old) and without (new) SDS along with that of commercial Pt/C using H2/O2 at 80°C.Figures3(a) and 3(b) show TEM images of sample C4.  While particle dispersion could be better, there is limited agglomeration, ensuring high utilization of the platinum present.  Figure 3(b) shows the shape and size of the platinum crystal, which is 4-5 nm in size.HRTEM image of Pt/MWCNTs at (a) low magnification and (b) high magnification.
(a)(b)


## 4. Conclusions

Pt/MWCNTs catalysts were successfully fabricated using a wetchemical method, with ethylene glycol serving as the medium in which the MWCNTs are suspended in and sodium formate as the reducing agent.  Polar and nonpolar covalent MWCNT functionalization methods were both used with success.  This shows that they are still advantages in using ethylene glycol in ways other than the well-studied, higher temperature, polyol methods.  There are many avenues available to improve upon this process.  Functionalization of the MWCNTs with citric acid has proven to be effective, and there may indeed be room left for optimization.  Further in-depth studies quantifying the degree of oxidation that citric acid provides to the MWCNTs may prove useful.  Nonetheless, nonpolar covalent modification with compounds, such as SDS, may ultimately prove to be the most effective at creating catalysts with properly dispersed and sized nanoparticles attached to the surface of the MWCNTs.  Continued work in this area will likely prove to be successful, especially if work is undertaken to take advantage of the micelle-forming capabilities of SDS in water.  Additionally, combining some water with the ethylene glycol should improve the cost effectiveness of this method, while still retaining the advantages ethylene glycol has with regard to filtering and washing.  The last issue that may need to be addressed, on a more general note, is the Nafion content in the Pt/MWCNT catalyst layer.  The optimal weight percentage of Nafion electrolyte for these types of catalysts may indeed be different than from traditional commercial catalysts.  An investigation of this with high quality Pt/MWCNT catalyst may yield easily obtainable performance improvements.



---

*Source: 708045-2011-04-27.xml*