# Synthesis Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of N-[(5′-Substituted 2′-phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)methylene]-5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-amines

Authors: A. R. Saundane; Vijaykumar Katkar; A. Verma Vaijinath
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

The main aim of the present study was to develop antimicrobial and antioxidant compounds. As a part of systematic investigation, several new compounds3a–c, 4a–c, and 5a–f were synthesized and screened for their biological activities. Compound 5f showed good zone of inhibition versus E. coli, S. aureus, and K. pneumoniae, whereas the compound 3a showed promising radical scavenging activity, ferric ions (Fe3+) reducing antioxidant power, and ferrous ions (Fe2+) metal chelating activity.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Antimicrobials are one of the most significant weapons in fighting bacterial infections. They have extremely benefited the health-related quality of human life. Indole and its derivatives have been reported to possess a variety of physiological and pharmacological activities like antibacterial [1], antifungal [2, 3], antitumor [4, 5], antiviral [6, 7], antioxidant [8], and so forth. In addition, oxadiazole derivatives are useful in antibacterial [9–11], anti-inflammatory [12, 13], antitubercular [14] and anticonvulsant [15] activities.As part of interest in the synthesis of heterocyclic compounds that have been explored for developing pharmaceutically important molecules, 4-thiazolidinones [16–18] and 2-azetidinones [19–23] have played an important role in medicinal chemistry. Moreover, several derivatives of 4-thiazolidinone and 2-azetidinone have been studied extensively because of their ready accessibility, diverse chemical reactivity, and broad spectrum of biological activities.In continuation of our research [24–26] and in view of the therapeutic importance of indole, oxadiazole, thiazolidinone, and azetidinone, which prompted us to construct several analogues of indole-containing oxadiazole, thiazolidinone, and azetidinone systems so as to get biologically more potent molecules.


## 2. Results and Discussion

The title compounds were synthesized as outlined in Scheme1. The starting compound, 5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-amine (2), was prepared using isoniazide (1) by following the literature procedure [27]. The precursor N-[(5′-substituted 2′-phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)methylene]-5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-amines (3a–c) was synthesized by cyclocondensation of 5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-amine (2) with 5-substituted 2-phenyl-1H-indol-3-carboxaldehydes [28] in 1,4-dioxane at reflux temperature. Compounds (3a–c) on refluxing with thioglycolic acid in N,N-dimethyl formamide afforded 2-(5′-substituted 2′-phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)-3-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]thiazolidin-4-ones (4a–c). Similarly, compounds (3a–c) on cyclocondensation with acetyl chloride or phenyl acetyl chloride afforded 4-(5′-substituted 2′-phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)-1-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]azetidin-2-ones (5a–c) or 4-(5′-substituted 2′-phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)-3-phenyl-1-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]azetidin-2-ones (5d–f), respectively. The structures of all these previously unknown compounds were confirmed by their spectral studies and elemental analysis.Scheme 1
Synthesis of indole analogues (3–5).


### 2.1. Antimicrobial Activity

The investigation of antibacterial screening (Table1) revealed that compounds 5dand5eexhibited maximum zone of inhibition against E. coli and P. aeruginosa at all concentrations. Compound 5fshowed good zone of inhibition versus E. coli, S. aureus, and K. pneumoniaeat all concentration, whereas the compounds 4a and 5b showed maximum zone of inhibition against E. coli and P. aeruginosa at all concentrations.Table 1
Antibacterial activity of compounds3–5.
Comp. number
Conc. (μg/mL) (zone of inhibition in mm)
E. coli
S. aureus
K.  pneumoniae
P. aeruginosa
1000
750
500
1000
750
500
1000
750
500
1000
750
500
3a
10
10
11
12
12
12
05
05
08
09
09
09
3b
05
05
08
09
09
10
02
02
05
05
05
08
3c
08
08
10
05
05
07
10
10
11
11
11
10
4a
13
13
14
09
09
10
09
10
10
02
02
05
4b
09
09
10
05
05
08
10
05
06
10
10
11
4c
10
10
11
02
02
05
09
09
10
11
11
10
5a
09
11
11
07
07
09
09
09
10
09
10
11
5b
11
03
05
00
00
00
05
05
06
14
13
12
5c
09
09
09
04
04
06
05
09
10
02
02
05
5d
14
14
14
12
12
12
10
10
12
13
13
13
5e
14
14
14
09
09
12
09
10
10
13
13
13
5f
13
13
14
16
14
13
13
13
13
05
06
08
Std.
16
16
15
18
16
15
15
15
14
15
14
14
Std.: Streptomycin (Standard).Antifungal activity results (Table2) indicated that compound 3a showed potent activity against A. niger and A. terreus,whereas compound 3b exhibited high activity against A. oryzae and A. flavus.Compound 3c showed good activity against A. terreusand A. flavus,whereas the compound 5a showed good activity against A. flavus at all concentration.Table 2
Antifungal activity of compounds3–5.
Comp. number
Conc. (μg/mL) (zone of inhibition in mm)
A. niger
A. oryzae
A. terreus
A. flavus
1000
750
500
1000
750
500
1000
750
500
1000
750
500
3a
12
12
12
10
10
10
13
12
12
02
02
02
3b
05
05
08
14
12
12
10
10
09
13
13
12
3c
10
09
09
10
10
10
14
13
12
13
13
12
4a
02
02
05
05
05
08
—
—
—
06
06
06
4b
10
08
04
09
09
09
—
—
—
09
09
09
4c
09
09
10
03
03
05
—
—
—
05
05
05
5a
09
10
10
02
02
02
06
06
08
13
12
12
5b
—
—
—
02
02
02
07
09
09
00
00
00
5c
02
09
09
05
05
08
05
05
08
09
09
09
5d
10
10
10
09
09
11
05
05
09
01
01
02
5e
10
09
09
09
09
09
02
02
03
03
03
03
5f
05
05
09
02
02
05
09
10
10
05
05
08
Std.
14
14
14
15
14
14
15
14
14
14
14
13
Std.: Fluconazole (Standard).In general from the above results, it can be concluded that compounds having chloro-or methyl-substitution at C-5 position of indole enhanced the activity due to electron-accepting or electron-donating nature of the groups.


### 2.2. Antioxidant Activities

#### 2.2.1.1,1-Diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH) Radical Scavenging Activity (RSA)

Antioxidants are intimately involved in the prevention of cellular damage, the common pathway for cancer, aging, and a variety of diseases. DPPH is a stable free radical that can accept an electron or hydrogen atom, and stability originates from delocalization of the unpaired electron over the molecule. Once formed these highly reactive radicals can start a chain reaction, like dominoes. Their chief danger comes from the damage they can do when they react with important cellular components such as DNA, RNA, or the cell membrane. Cells may function poorly or die if this occurs. To prevent free radical damage the body has a defense system of antioxidants. The scavenging of the stable 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH) radical model is widely used method to evaluate antioxidant activities in relatively short time compared with other methods. DPPH has an odd electron and so has a strong absorption band at 517 nm.The radical scavenging activity of test compounds (3–5) in presence of DPPH radical was carried out, and the results were compared with the standards 2-tert-butyl-4-methoxy phenol (butylated hydroxyl anisole, BHA), 2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1,4-benzenediol (tertiary butylated hydroquinone, TBHQ), and ascorbic acid (AA) (Figures 1 and 2). The results of test compounds indicated that compounds 3a, 4a, 5a, and 5fexhibited good RSA at 75 and 100 μg/mL concentrations. Compound 5ashowed promising activity at 50 μg/mL concentration. However, none of the compounds exhibited RSA better than the standards. The higher activity of compounds 4a and 5a may be due to the presence of labile hydrogen of indole-NH and/or chlorine atom in their structure.Figure 1
Radical scavenging activity of compounds (3-4).Figure 2
Radical scavenging activity of compounds (5).


#### 2.2.2. Ferric Ions (Fe3+) Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP)

The ferric ion (Fe3+) is a relatively biologically inactive form of iron. However, it can be reduced to the active Fe2+ depending on the condition, particularly pH [29], and oxidized back through Fenton-type reaction [30] with the production of hydroxyl radical or the Haber-Weiss reaction with superoxide anions. Reducing power is to measure the reductive ability of an antioxidant, and it is evaluated by the transformation of Fe3+ to Fe2+ by donation of an electron in the presence of test compounds. Therefore, the Fe2+ can be monitored by measuring the formation of Perl’s Prussian blue at 700 nm.The reducing power activity of the test compounds was carried out at different concentrations, and the results were compared with the standards BHA, TBHQ, and AA (Figures3 and 4). The analysis of the results indicated that compound 5aexhibited promising reducing power activity at 25 μg/mL concentration. Compounds 3aand5ashowed higher reducing power activity at 50 μg/mL concentration, whereas the compounds 3a, 5a,and 5eexhibited good reducing activity at 75 μg/mL concentration. Compounds 3a, 3b, 5a, and 5e showed higher reducing power activity at 100 μg/mL concentration.Figure 3
FRAP of compounds (3-4).Figure 4
FRAP of compounds (5).


#### 2.2.3. Ferrous (Fe2+) Metal Ion Chelating Activity

Metal chelating capacity reduces the concentration of the catalyzing transition metal in lipid peroxidation. It was reported that chelating agents, which formσ-bonds with a metal, are effective as secondary antioxidants because they reduce the redox potential therapy stabilizing the oxidized form of metal ion [31]. Fenton’s reaction accelerates peroxidation by decomposing lipid hydroperoxides into peroxy and alkoxy radicals that can themselves abstract hydrogen and perpetuate the chain reaction of lipid peroxidation [32, 33].
(1)Fe2++H2O2→Fe3++OH-+OH∙
Fe3+ ion also produces radical from peroxides, although the rate is tenfold less than that of Fe+2 ion, which is the most powerful pro-oxidant among the various types of metal ions.The chelating effect of ferrous ion (Fe2+) with the test compounds was determined, and the results were compared with standards BHA, TBHQ, and AA (Figures 5 and 6). Compound 3ashowed promising chelating activity at 50 and 75 μg/mL concentrations. Whereas, the compounds 3a, 3c, and 5b showed good chelating activity at 100 μg/mL concentration. Compound 3a showed higher chelating activity which may be accounted for the presence of azomethine group in the structure of compound 3a.Figure 5
Metal-chelating activity of compounds (3-4).Figure 6
Metal-chelating activity of compounds (5).


## 2.1. Antimicrobial Activity

The investigation of antibacterial screening (Table1) revealed that compounds 5dand5eexhibited maximum zone of inhibition against E. coli and P. aeruginosa at all concentrations. Compound 5fshowed good zone of inhibition versus E. coli, S. aureus, and K. pneumoniaeat all concentration, whereas the compounds 4a and 5b showed maximum zone of inhibition against E. coli and P. aeruginosa at all concentrations.Table 1
Antibacterial activity of compounds3–5.
Comp. number
Conc. (μg/mL) (zone of inhibition in mm)
E. coli
S. aureus
K.  pneumoniae
P. aeruginosa
1000
750
500
1000
750
500
1000
750
500
1000
750
500
3a
10
10
11
12
12
12
05
05
08
09
09
09
3b
05
05
08
09
09
10
02
02
05
05
05
08
3c
08
08
10
05
05
07
10
10
11
11
11
10
4a
13
13
14
09
09
10
09
10
10
02
02
05
4b
09
09
10
05
05
08
10
05
06
10
10
11
4c
10
10
11
02
02
05
09
09
10
11
11
10
5a
09
11
11
07
07
09
09
09
10
09
10
11
5b
11
03
05
00
00
00
05
05
06
14
13
12
5c
09
09
09
04
04
06
05
09
10
02
02
05
5d
14
14
14
12
12
12
10
10
12
13
13
13
5e
14
14
14
09
09
12
09
10
10
13
13
13
5f
13
13
14
16
14
13
13
13
13
05
06
08
Std.
16
16
15
18
16
15
15
15
14
15
14
14
Std.: Streptomycin (Standard).Antifungal activity results (Table2) indicated that compound 3a showed potent activity against A. niger and A. terreus,whereas compound 3b exhibited high activity against A. oryzae and A. flavus.Compound 3c showed good activity against A. terreusand A. flavus,whereas the compound 5a showed good activity against A. flavus at all concentration.Table 2
Antifungal activity of compounds3–5.
Comp. number
Conc. (μg/mL) (zone of inhibition in mm)
A. niger
A. oryzae
A. terreus
A. flavus
1000
750
500
1000
750
500
1000
750
500
1000
750
500
3a
12
12
12
10
10
10
13
12
12
02
02
02
3b
05
05
08
14
12
12
10
10
09
13
13
12
3c
10
09
09
10
10
10
14
13
12
13
13
12
4a
02
02
05
05
05
08
—
—
—
06
06
06
4b
10
08
04
09
09
09
—
—
—
09
09
09
4c
09
09
10
03
03
05
—
—
—
05
05
05
5a
09
10
10
02
02
02
06
06
08
13
12
12
5b
—
—
—
02
02
02
07
09
09
00
00
00
5c
02
09
09
05
05
08
05
05
08
09
09
09
5d
10
10
10
09
09
11
05
05
09
01
01
02
5e
10
09
09
09
09
09
02
02
03
03
03
03
5f
05
05
09
02
02
05
09
10
10
05
05
08
Std.
14
14
14
15
14
14
15
14
14
14
14
13
Std.: Fluconazole (Standard).In general from the above results, it can be concluded that compounds having chloro-or methyl-substitution at C-5 position of indole enhanced the activity due to electron-accepting or electron-donating nature of the groups.


## 2.2. Antioxidant Activities

### 2.2.1.1,1-Diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH) Radical Scavenging Activity (RSA)

Antioxidants are intimately involved in the prevention of cellular damage, the common pathway for cancer, aging, and a variety of diseases. DPPH is a stable free radical that can accept an electron or hydrogen atom, and stability originates from delocalization of the unpaired electron over the molecule. Once formed these highly reactive radicals can start a chain reaction, like dominoes. Their chief danger comes from the damage they can do when they react with important cellular components such as DNA, RNA, or the cell membrane. Cells may function poorly or die if this occurs. To prevent free radical damage the body has a defense system of antioxidants. The scavenging of the stable 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH) radical model is widely used method to evaluate antioxidant activities in relatively short time compared with other methods. DPPH has an odd electron and so has a strong absorption band at 517 nm.The radical scavenging activity of test compounds (3–5) in presence of DPPH radical was carried out, and the results were compared with the standards 2-tert-butyl-4-methoxy phenol (butylated hydroxyl anisole, BHA), 2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1,4-benzenediol (tertiary butylated hydroquinone, TBHQ), and ascorbic acid (AA) (Figures 1 and 2). The results of test compounds indicated that compounds 3a, 4a, 5a, and 5fexhibited good RSA at 75 and 100 μg/mL concentrations. Compound 5ashowed promising activity at 50 μg/mL concentration. However, none of the compounds exhibited RSA better than the standards. The higher activity of compounds 4a and 5a may be due to the presence of labile hydrogen of indole-NH and/or chlorine atom in their structure.Figure 1
Radical scavenging activity of compounds (3-4).Figure 2
Radical scavenging activity of compounds (5).


### 2.2.2. Ferric Ions (Fe3+) Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP)

The ferric ion (Fe3+) is a relatively biologically inactive form of iron. However, it can be reduced to the active Fe2+ depending on the condition, particularly pH [29], and oxidized back through Fenton-type reaction [30] with the production of hydroxyl radical or the Haber-Weiss reaction with superoxide anions. Reducing power is to measure the reductive ability of an antioxidant, and it is evaluated by the transformation of Fe3+ to Fe2+ by donation of an electron in the presence of test compounds. Therefore, the Fe2+ can be monitored by measuring the formation of Perl’s Prussian blue at 700 nm.The reducing power activity of the test compounds was carried out at different concentrations, and the results were compared with the standards BHA, TBHQ, and AA (Figures3 and 4). The analysis of the results indicated that compound 5aexhibited promising reducing power activity at 25 μg/mL concentration. Compounds 3aand5ashowed higher reducing power activity at 50 μg/mL concentration, whereas the compounds 3a, 5a,and 5eexhibited good reducing activity at 75 μg/mL concentration. Compounds 3a, 3b, 5a, and 5e showed higher reducing power activity at 100 μg/mL concentration.Figure 3
FRAP of compounds (3-4).Figure 4
FRAP of compounds (5).


### 2.2.3. Ferrous (Fe2+) Metal Ion Chelating Activity

Metal chelating capacity reduces the concentration of the catalyzing transition metal in lipid peroxidation. It was reported that chelating agents, which formσ-bonds with a metal, are effective as secondary antioxidants because they reduce the redox potential therapy stabilizing the oxidized form of metal ion [31]. Fenton’s reaction accelerates peroxidation by decomposing lipid hydroperoxides into peroxy and alkoxy radicals that can themselves abstract hydrogen and perpetuate the chain reaction of lipid peroxidation [32, 33].
(1)Fe2++H2O2→Fe3++OH-+OH∙
Fe3+ ion also produces radical from peroxides, although the rate is tenfold less than that of Fe+2 ion, which is the most powerful pro-oxidant among the various types of metal ions.The chelating effect of ferrous ion (Fe2+) with the test compounds was determined, and the results were compared with standards BHA, TBHQ, and AA (Figures 5 and 6). Compound 3ashowed promising chelating activity at 50 and 75 μg/mL concentrations. Whereas, the compounds 3a, 3c, and 5b showed good chelating activity at 100 μg/mL concentration. Compound 3a showed higher chelating activity which may be accounted for the presence of azomethine group in the structure of compound 3a.Figure 5
Metal-chelating activity of compounds (3-4).Figure 6
Metal-chelating activity of compounds (5).


## 2.2.1.1,1-Diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH) Radical Scavenging Activity (RSA)

Antioxidants are intimately involved in the prevention of cellular damage, the common pathway for cancer, aging, and a variety of diseases. DPPH is a stable free radical that can accept an electron or hydrogen atom, and stability originates from delocalization of the unpaired electron over the molecule. Once formed these highly reactive radicals can start a chain reaction, like dominoes. Their chief danger comes from the damage they can do when they react with important cellular components such as DNA, RNA, or the cell membrane. Cells may function poorly or die if this occurs. To prevent free radical damage the body has a defense system of antioxidants. The scavenging of the stable 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH) radical model is widely used method to evaluate antioxidant activities in relatively short time compared with other methods. DPPH has an odd electron and so has a strong absorption band at 517 nm.The radical scavenging activity of test compounds (3–5) in presence of DPPH radical was carried out, and the results were compared with the standards 2-tert-butyl-4-methoxy phenol (butylated hydroxyl anisole, BHA), 2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1,4-benzenediol (tertiary butylated hydroquinone, TBHQ), and ascorbic acid (AA) (Figures 1 and 2). The results of test compounds indicated that compounds 3a, 4a, 5a, and 5fexhibited good RSA at 75 and 100 μg/mL concentrations. Compound 5ashowed promising activity at 50 μg/mL concentration. However, none of the compounds exhibited RSA better than the standards. The higher activity of compounds 4a and 5a may be due to the presence of labile hydrogen of indole-NH and/or chlorine atom in their structure.Figure 1
Radical scavenging activity of compounds (3-4).Figure 2
Radical scavenging activity of compounds (5).


## 2.2.2. Ferric Ions (Fe3+) Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP)

The ferric ion (Fe3+) is a relatively biologically inactive form of iron. However, it can be reduced to the active Fe2+ depending on the condition, particularly pH [29], and oxidized back through Fenton-type reaction [30] with the production of hydroxyl radical or the Haber-Weiss reaction with superoxide anions. Reducing power is to measure the reductive ability of an antioxidant, and it is evaluated by the transformation of Fe3+ to Fe2+ by donation of an electron in the presence of test compounds. Therefore, the Fe2+ can be monitored by measuring the formation of Perl’s Prussian blue at 700 nm.The reducing power activity of the test compounds was carried out at different concentrations, and the results were compared with the standards BHA, TBHQ, and AA (Figures3 and 4). The analysis of the results indicated that compound 5aexhibited promising reducing power activity at 25 μg/mL concentration. Compounds 3aand5ashowed higher reducing power activity at 50 μg/mL concentration, whereas the compounds 3a, 5a,and 5eexhibited good reducing activity at 75 μg/mL concentration. Compounds 3a, 3b, 5a, and 5e showed higher reducing power activity at 100 μg/mL concentration.Figure 3
FRAP of compounds (3-4).Figure 4
FRAP of compounds (5).


## 2.2.3. Ferrous (Fe2+) Metal Ion Chelating Activity

Metal chelating capacity reduces the concentration of the catalyzing transition metal in lipid peroxidation. It was reported that chelating agents, which formσ-bonds with a metal, are effective as secondary antioxidants because they reduce the redox potential therapy stabilizing the oxidized form of metal ion [31]. Fenton’s reaction accelerates peroxidation by decomposing lipid hydroperoxides into peroxy and alkoxy radicals that can themselves abstract hydrogen and perpetuate the chain reaction of lipid peroxidation [32, 33].
(1)Fe2++H2O2→Fe3++OH-+OH∙
Fe3+ ion also produces radical from peroxides, although the rate is tenfold less than that of Fe+2 ion, which is the most powerful pro-oxidant among the various types of metal ions.The chelating effect of ferrous ion (Fe2+) with the test compounds was determined, and the results were compared with standards BHA, TBHQ, and AA (Figures 5 and 6). Compound 3ashowed promising chelating activity at 50 and 75 μg/mL concentrations. Whereas, the compounds 3a, 3c, and 5b showed good chelating activity at 100 μg/mL concentration. Compound 3a showed higher chelating activity which may be accounted for the presence of azomethine group in the structure of compound 3a.Figure 5
Metal-chelating activity of compounds (3-4).Figure 6
Metal-chelating activity of compounds (5).


## 3. Conclusion

In this study, we have demonstrated the synthesis of some novel indole derivatives, incorporating potential chemotherapeutic units, namely, isoniazide, oxadiazole, thiazolidinone and azetidinone. Some of the chloro-and methyl-substituted compounds have exhibited promising antimicrobial and antioxidant activities.


## 4. Experimental Protocols

All the reagents were obtained commercially and used by further purification. Melting points were determined by an open capillary method and were uncorrected. Purity of the compounds was checked by TLC using silica-gel-G-coated aluminium plates (Merck), and spots were visualized by exposing the dry plates to iodine vapors. The IR (KBr) spectra were recorded with a Perkin-Elmer spectrum one FT-IR spectrometer. The1H NMR (DMSO-d6) spectra were recorded on Bruker NMR (500 MHz), and the chemical shifts were expressed in ppm (δ scale) downfield from TMS. Mass spectra were recorded with a JEOL GCMATE II GC-MS mass spectrometer. Elemental analysis was carried out using Flash EA 1112 series elemental analyzer.5-(Pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-amine (2) was prepared by following the reported method [27].


### 4.1.  General Procedure for the Synthesis of N-[(5′-Substituted 2′-phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)methylene]-5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-amines (3a–c)

A solution of compound2(0.01 mol) and 5-substituted 2-phenylindole-3-carboxaldehyde (0.01 mol) in 1,4-dioxane (40 mL) containing glacial acetic acid (2 mL) was refluxed for 8 hrs. The solvent was distilled off at reduced pressure. The reaction mixture was cooled and poured into ice-cold water. The separated product was filtered, washed thoroughly with cold water, dried, and recrystallized from ethanol to furnish 3a–c.N-[(5′-Chloro-2′-phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)methylene]-5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-amine (3a),yellow crystals, yield 75%, mp 288-89°C, Rf, 0.61 ethylacetate : ethanol; IR (KBr): ν/cm−1 3465 (NH), 1573 (C=N); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 12.40 (s, 1H, indole NH), 9.00 (s, 1H, N=CH), 8.10 (s, 1H, indole-H4), 8.00 (d, 1H, indole-H6), 7.60 (d, 1H, indole-H7), 7.00–7.55 (m, 5H, Ar-H and 4H, pyridine-H); Mass m/z: 399 (M+), 401 (M++2); Anal. Calcd. for C22H14N5OCl: C, 66.09; H, 3.53; N, 17.52. Found: C, 66.00; H, 3.60; N, 17.54%.N-[(5′-Methyl-2′-phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)methylene]-5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-amine (3b), colorless needles, yield 63%, mp 285-86°C, Rf, 0.49 ethylacetate : ethanol; IR (KBr): ν/cm−1 3400 (NH), 1590 (C=N); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 12.00 (s, 1H, indole NH), 8.85 (s, 1H, N=CH), 7.60–8.00 (m, 5H, Ar-H and 4H, pyridine-H), 7.55 (s, 1H, indole-H4), 7.45 (d, 1H, indole-H6), 6.95 (d, 1H, indole-H7), 2.30 (s, 3H, CH3); Anal. Calcd. for C23H17N5O: C, 72.81; H, 4.52; N, 18.46. Found: C, 72.78; H, 4.45; N, 18.38%.N-[(2′-Phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)methylene]-5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-amine (3c), white solid, yield 67%, mp 240-41°C, Rf, 0.62 ethylacetate : ethanol; IR (KBr): ν/cm−1 3375 (NH), 1595 (C=N); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 12.10 (s, 1H, indole NH), 9.00 (s, 1H, N=CH), 7.00–8.40 (m, 5H, Ar-H, 4H, indole-H and 4H, pyridine-H); Anal. Calcd. for C22H15N5O: C, 72.32; H, 4.14; N, 19.17. Found: C, 72.35; H, 4.09; N, 19.15%.


### 4.2. General Procedure for the Synthesis of 2-(5′-Substituted 2′-phenyl-1H -indol-3′-yl)-3-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]thiazolidin-4-ones (4a–c)

A mixture of compounds3a–c (0.01 mol) and thioglycolic acid (0.01 mol) containing a pinch of anhydrous zinc chloride in DMF (30 mL) was refluxed for 8 hrs. The mixture was then cooled and poured into ice-cold water. The separated product was filtered, washed with saturated sodium carbonate solution to remove unreacted thioglycolic acid followed by cold-water, dried, and recrystallized from ethanol to get pure 4a–c.2-(5′-Chloro-2′-phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)-3-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]thiazolidin-4-one (4a), yellow solid, yield 78%, mp 190-91°C, Rf, 0.65 ethylacetate : benzene (1 : 2); IR (KBr): ν/cm−1 3444 (NH), 1745 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 12.60 (s, 1H, indole NH), 8.50 (s, 1H, indole-H4), 8.34 (d, 1H, indole-H6), 7.92 (d, 1H, indole-H7), 7.00–7.65 (m, 5H, Ar-H and 4H, pyridine-H), 4.80 (s, 1H, CHN), 3.90 (s, 2H, CH2); Mass m/z: 473 (M+), 475 (M++2); Anal. Calcd. for C24H16N5O2SCl: C, 60.82; H, 3.40; N, 14.78. Found: C, 60.79; H, 3.35; N, 14.70%.2-(5′-Methyl-2′-phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)-3-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]thiazolidin-4-one (4b), white solid, yield 85%, mp 201-02°C, Rf, 0.55 ethylacetate : benzene (1 : 2); IR (KBr): ν/cm−1 3448 (NH), 1728 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 12.00 (s, 1H, indole NH), 7.50–8.00 (m, 5H, Ar-H and 4H, pyridine-H), 8.37 (s, 1H, indole-H4), 8.24 (d, 1H, indole-H6), 7.10 (d, 1H, indole-H7), 5.00 (s, 1H, CHN), 4.00 (s, 2H, CH2), 2.25 (s, 3H, CH3); Anal. Calcd. for C25H19N5O2S: C, 66.21; H, 4.22; N, 15.44. Found: C, 66.19; H, 4.20; N, 15.35%.2-(2′-Phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)-3-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]thiazolidin-4-one (4c), yellow solid, yield 82%, mp 180-81°C, Rf, 0.58 ethylacetate :benzene (1 : 2); IR (KBr): ν/cm−1 3318 (NH), 1730 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 12.01 (s, 1H, indole NH), 7.10–8.45 (m, 5H, Ar-H, 4H, indole-H and 4H, pyridine-H), 5.00 (s, 1H, CHN), 3.48 (s, 2H, CH2); Anal. Calcd. for C24H17N5O2S: C, 65.59; H, 3.90; N, 15.94. Found: C, 65.50; H, 3.85; N, 15.99%.


### 4.3. General procedure for the synthesis of 4-(5′-Substituted 2′-phenyl-1H -indol-3′-yl)-1-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]azetidin-2-ones (5a–c)

A solution of compounds4a–c (0.01 mol) in dioxane (10 mL) was added to a well-stirred mixture of acetyl chloride (0.01 mol) and triethyl amine (0.01 mol) in dioxane (15 mL) during 30 min. The reaction mixture was then stirred for 8 hrs and kept for 24 hrs at room temperature. The product separated was filtered, dried, and recrystallized from ethanol to get pure 5a–c.4-(5′-Chloro-2′-phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)-1-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]azetidin-2-one (5a),yellow crystal, yield 65%, mp 202–05°C, Rf, 0.64 benzene : methanol (1 : 3); IR (KBr): ν/cm−1 3444 (NH), 1766 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 12.60 (s, 1H, indole NH), 8.20 (s, 1H, indole-H4), 8.04 (d, 1H, indole-H6), 7.92 (d, 1H, indole-H7), 6.90–7.65 (m, 5H, Ar-H and 4H, pyridine-H), 4.80 (t, 1H, CHN), 4.50 (d, 2H, CH2); Mass m/z: 441 (M+), 443 (M++2); Anal. Calcd. for C24H16N5O2Cl: C, 65.24; H, 3.65; N, 15.85. Found: C, 65.20; H, 3.60; N, 15.85%.4-(5′-Methyl-2′-phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)-1-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]azetidin-2-one (5b), pale yellow crystal, yield 68%, mp 160-61°C, Rf, 0.53 benzene : methanol (1 : 3); IR (KBr): ν/cm−1 3444 (NH), 1766 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 12.60 (s, 1H, indole NH), 8.20 (s, 1H, indole-H4), 8.04 (d, 1H, indole-H6), 7.92 (d, 1H, indole-H7), 6.90–7.65 (m, 5H, Ar-H and 4H, pyridine-H), 4.80 (t, 1H, CHN), 4.50 (d, 2H, CH2), 2.49 (s, 3H, CH3); Anal. Calcd. for C25H19N5O2: C, 71.25; H, 4.54; N, 16.62. Found: C, 71.20; H, 4.50; N, 16.60%.4-(2′-Phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)-1-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]azetidin-2-one (5c),white solid, yield 71%, mp 164-65°C, Rf, 0.60 benzene : methanol (1 : 3); IR (KBr): ν/cm−1 3444 (NH), 1766 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 12.60 (s, 1H, indole NH), 7.00–8.18 (m, 5H, Ar-H, 4H, indole-H and 4H, pyridine-H), 4.92 (t, 1H, CHN), 4.62 (d, 2H, CH2); Anal. Calcd. for C24H17N5O2: C, 70.75; H, 4.21; N, 17.19. Found: C, 70.72; H, 4.15; N, 17.13%.


### 4.4. General Procedure for the Synthesis of 4-(5′-Substituted 2′-phenyl-1H -indol-3′-yl)-3-phenyl-1-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]azetidin-2-ones (5d–f)

To a solution of Schiff’s base (3a–c) (0.02 mol) in dry benzene (30 mL) containing few drops of triethyl amine, phenyl acetyl chloride (0.02 mol) was added dropwise with stirring during 10 mins. After the addition was over, the reaction mixture was refluxed for 1 hr. Triethyl amine hydrochloride formed was filtered off and washed several times with dry benzene. The filtrate and washings were combined and concentrated under reduced pressure. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature the product obtained was filtered and washed with petroleum ether (40 : 60) to remove unreacted Schiff’s base and recrystallized from aqueous ethanol to afford (5d–f).4-(5′-Chloro-2′-phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)-3-phenyl-1-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]azetidin-2-one (5d), brown crystal, yield 67%, mp 212-13°C, Rf, 0.63 ethylacetate : benzene (9 : 1); IR (KBr): ν/cm−1 3447 (NH), 1764 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 12.60 (s, 1H, indole NH), 8.20 (s, 1H, indole-H4), 8.12 (d, 1H, indole-H6), 7.66 (d, 1H, indole-H7), 7.00–7.44 (m, 10H, Ar-H and 4H, pyridine-H), 6.30 (d, 1H, CHN), 6.20 (d, 1H, CHCO); Mass m/z: 517 (M+), 519 (M++2); Anal. Calcd. for C30H20N5O2Cl: C, 69.56; H, 3.89; N, 13.52. Found: C, 65.58; H, 3.92; N, 13.47%.4-(5′-Methyl-2′-phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)-3-phenyl-1-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]azetidin-2-one (5e), yellow crystal, yield 76%, mp 235-36°C, Rf, 0.69 ethylacetate : benzene (9 : 1); IR (KBr): ν/cm−1 3400 (NH), 1700 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 12.00 (s, 1H, indole NH), 8.00 (s, 1H, indole-H4), 7.94 (d, 1H, indole-H6), 7.62 (d, 1H, indole-H7), 7.00–7.44 (m, 10H, Ar-H and 4H, pyridine-H), 6.00 (d, 1H, CHN), 5.60 (d, 1H, CHCO), 2.32 (s, 3H, CH3); Anal. Calcd. for C31H23N5O2: C, 74.83; H, 4.66; N, 14.08. Found: C, 7479; H, 4.62; N, 14.00%.4-(2′-Phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)-1-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]azetidin-2-one (5f), white solid, yield 75%, mp 261-62°C, Rf, 0.57 ethylacetate : benzene (9 : 1); IR (KBr): ν/cm−1 3415 (NH), 1718 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 12.15 (s, 1H, indole NH), 7.15–8.20 (m, 10H, Ar-H, 4H, indole-H and 4H, pyridine-H), 5.92 (d, 1H, CHN), 5.42 (d, 1H, CHCO); Anal. calcd. for C30H21N5O2: C, 74.52; H, 4.38; N, 14.48. Found: C, 74.50; H, 4.35; N, 14.42%.


## 4.1.  General Procedure for the Synthesis of N-[(5′-Substituted 2′-phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)methylene]-5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-amines (3a–c)

A solution of compound2(0.01 mol) and 5-substituted 2-phenylindole-3-carboxaldehyde (0.01 mol) in 1,4-dioxane (40 mL) containing glacial acetic acid (2 mL) was refluxed for 8 hrs. The solvent was distilled off at reduced pressure. The reaction mixture was cooled and poured into ice-cold water. The separated product was filtered, washed thoroughly with cold water, dried, and recrystallized from ethanol to furnish 3a–c.N-[(5′-Chloro-2′-phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)methylene]-5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-amine (3a),yellow crystals, yield 75%, mp 288-89°C, Rf, 0.61 ethylacetate : ethanol; IR (KBr): ν/cm−1 3465 (NH), 1573 (C=N); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 12.40 (s, 1H, indole NH), 9.00 (s, 1H, N=CH), 8.10 (s, 1H, indole-H4), 8.00 (d, 1H, indole-H6), 7.60 (d, 1H, indole-H7), 7.00–7.55 (m, 5H, Ar-H and 4H, pyridine-H); Mass m/z: 399 (M+), 401 (M++2); Anal. Calcd. for C22H14N5OCl: C, 66.09; H, 3.53; N, 17.52. Found: C, 66.00; H, 3.60; N, 17.54%.N-[(5′-Methyl-2′-phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)methylene]-5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-amine (3b), colorless needles, yield 63%, mp 285-86°C, Rf, 0.49 ethylacetate : ethanol; IR (KBr): ν/cm−1 3400 (NH), 1590 (C=N); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 12.00 (s, 1H, indole NH), 8.85 (s, 1H, N=CH), 7.60–8.00 (m, 5H, Ar-H and 4H, pyridine-H), 7.55 (s, 1H, indole-H4), 7.45 (d, 1H, indole-H6), 6.95 (d, 1H, indole-H7), 2.30 (s, 3H, CH3); Anal. Calcd. for C23H17N5O: C, 72.81; H, 4.52; N, 18.46. Found: C, 72.78; H, 4.45; N, 18.38%.N-[(2′-Phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)methylene]-5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-amine (3c), white solid, yield 67%, mp 240-41°C, Rf, 0.62 ethylacetate : ethanol; IR (KBr): ν/cm−1 3375 (NH), 1595 (C=N); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 12.10 (s, 1H, indole NH), 9.00 (s, 1H, N=CH), 7.00–8.40 (m, 5H, Ar-H, 4H, indole-H and 4H, pyridine-H); Anal. Calcd. for C22H15N5O: C, 72.32; H, 4.14; N, 19.17. Found: C, 72.35; H, 4.09; N, 19.15%.


## 4.2. General Procedure for the Synthesis of 2-(5′-Substituted 2′-phenyl-1H -indol-3′-yl)-3-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]thiazolidin-4-ones (4a–c)

A mixture of compounds3a–c (0.01 mol) and thioglycolic acid (0.01 mol) containing a pinch of anhydrous zinc chloride in DMF (30 mL) was refluxed for 8 hrs. The mixture was then cooled and poured into ice-cold water. The separated product was filtered, washed with saturated sodium carbonate solution to remove unreacted thioglycolic acid followed by cold-water, dried, and recrystallized from ethanol to get pure 4a–c.2-(5′-Chloro-2′-phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)-3-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]thiazolidin-4-one (4a), yellow solid, yield 78%, mp 190-91°C, Rf, 0.65 ethylacetate : benzene (1 : 2); IR (KBr): ν/cm−1 3444 (NH), 1745 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 12.60 (s, 1H, indole NH), 8.50 (s, 1H, indole-H4), 8.34 (d, 1H, indole-H6), 7.92 (d, 1H, indole-H7), 7.00–7.65 (m, 5H, Ar-H and 4H, pyridine-H), 4.80 (s, 1H, CHN), 3.90 (s, 2H, CH2); Mass m/z: 473 (M+), 475 (M++2); Anal. Calcd. for C24H16N5O2SCl: C, 60.82; H, 3.40; N, 14.78. Found: C, 60.79; H, 3.35; N, 14.70%.2-(5′-Methyl-2′-phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)-3-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]thiazolidin-4-one (4b), white solid, yield 85%, mp 201-02°C, Rf, 0.55 ethylacetate : benzene (1 : 2); IR (KBr): ν/cm−1 3448 (NH), 1728 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 12.00 (s, 1H, indole NH), 7.50–8.00 (m, 5H, Ar-H and 4H, pyridine-H), 8.37 (s, 1H, indole-H4), 8.24 (d, 1H, indole-H6), 7.10 (d, 1H, indole-H7), 5.00 (s, 1H, CHN), 4.00 (s, 2H, CH2), 2.25 (s, 3H, CH3); Anal. Calcd. for C25H19N5O2S: C, 66.21; H, 4.22; N, 15.44. Found: C, 66.19; H, 4.20; N, 15.35%.2-(2′-Phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)-3-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]thiazolidin-4-one (4c), yellow solid, yield 82%, mp 180-81°C, Rf, 0.58 ethylacetate :benzene (1 : 2); IR (KBr): ν/cm−1 3318 (NH), 1730 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 12.01 (s, 1H, indole NH), 7.10–8.45 (m, 5H, Ar-H, 4H, indole-H and 4H, pyridine-H), 5.00 (s, 1H, CHN), 3.48 (s, 2H, CH2); Anal. Calcd. for C24H17N5O2S: C, 65.59; H, 3.90; N, 15.94. Found: C, 65.50; H, 3.85; N, 15.99%.


## 4.3. General procedure for the synthesis of 4-(5′-Substituted 2′-phenyl-1H -indol-3′-yl)-1-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]azetidin-2-ones (5a–c)

A solution of compounds4a–c (0.01 mol) in dioxane (10 mL) was added to a well-stirred mixture of acetyl chloride (0.01 mol) and triethyl amine (0.01 mol) in dioxane (15 mL) during 30 min. The reaction mixture was then stirred for 8 hrs and kept for 24 hrs at room temperature. The product separated was filtered, dried, and recrystallized from ethanol to get pure 5a–c.4-(5′-Chloro-2′-phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)-1-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]azetidin-2-one (5a),yellow crystal, yield 65%, mp 202–05°C, Rf, 0.64 benzene : methanol (1 : 3); IR (KBr): ν/cm−1 3444 (NH), 1766 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 12.60 (s, 1H, indole NH), 8.20 (s, 1H, indole-H4), 8.04 (d, 1H, indole-H6), 7.92 (d, 1H, indole-H7), 6.90–7.65 (m, 5H, Ar-H and 4H, pyridine-H), 4.80 (t, 1H, CHN), 4.50 (d, 2H, CH2); Mass m/z: 441 (M+), 443 (M++2); Anal. Calcd. for C24H16N5O2Cl: C, 65.24; H, 3.65; N, 15.85. Found: C, 65.20; H, 3.60; N, 15.85%.4-(5′-Methyl-2′-phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)-1-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]azetidin-2-one (5b), pale yellow crystal, yield 68%, mp 160-61°C, Rf, 0.53 benzene : methanol (1 : 3); IR (KBr): ν/cm−1 3444 (NH), 1766 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 12.60 (s, 1H, indole NH), 8.20 (s, 1H, indole-H4), 8.04 (d, 1H, indole-H6), 7.92 (d, 1H, indole-H7), 6.90–7.65 (m, 5H, Ar-H and 4H, pyridine-H), 4.80 (t, 1H, CHN), 4.50 (d, 2H, CH2), 2.49 (s, 3H, CH3); Anal. Calcd. for C25H19N5O2: C, 71.25; H, 4.54; N, 16.62. Found: C, 71.20; H, 4.50; N, 16.60%.4-(2′-Phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)-1-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]azetidin-2-one (5c),white solid, yield 71%, mp 164-65°C, Rf, 0.60 benzene : methanol (1 : 3); IR (KBr): ν/cm−1 3444 (NH), 1766 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 12.60 (s, 1H, indole NH), 7.00–8.18 (m, 5H, Ar-H, 4H, indole-H and 4H, pyridine-H), 4.92 (t, 1H, CHN), 4.62 (d, 2H, CH2); Anal. Calcd. for C24H17N5O2: C, 70.75; H, 4.21; N, 17.19. Found: C, 70.72; H, 4.15; N, 17.13%.


## 4.4. General Procedure for the Synthesis of 4-(5′-Substituted 2′-phenyl-1H -indol-3′-yl)-3-phenyl-1-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]azetidin-2-ones (5d–f)

To a solution of Schiff’s base (3a–c) (0.02 mol) in dry benzene (30 mL) containing few drops of triethyl amine, phenyl acetyl chloride (0.02 mol) was added dropwise with stirring during 10 mins. After the addition was over, the reaction mixture was refluxed for 1 hr. Triethyl amine hydrochloride formed was filtered off and washed several times with dry benzene. The filtrate and washings were combined and concentrated under reduced pressure. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature the product obtained was filtered and washed with petroleum ether (40 : 60) to remove unreacted Schiff’s base and recrystallized from aqueous ethanol to afford (5d–f).4-(5′-Chloro-2′-phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)-3-phenyl-1-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]azetidin-2-one (5d), brown crystal, yield 67%, mp 212-13°C, Rf, 0.63 ethylacetate : benzene (9 : 1); IR (KBr): ν/cm−1 3447 (NH), 1764 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 12.60 (s, 1H, indole NH), 8.20 (s, 1H, indole-H4), 8.12 (d, 1H, indole-H6), 7.66 (d, 1H, indole-H7), 7.00–7.44 (m, 10H, Ar-H and 4H, pyridine-H), 6.30 (d, 1H, CHN), 6.20 (d, 1H, CHCO); Mass m/z: 517 (M+), 519 (M++2); Anal. Calcd. for C30H20N5O2Cl: C, 69.56; H, 3.89; N, 13.52. Found: C, 65.58; H, 3.92; N, 13.47%.4-(5′-Methyl-2′-phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)-3-phenyl-1-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]azetidin-2-one (5e), yellow crystal, yield 76%, mp 235-36°C, Rf, 0.69 ethylacetate : benzene (9 : 1); IR (KBr): ν/cm−1 3400 (NH), 1700 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 12.00 (s, 1H, indole NH), 8.00 (s, 1H, indole-H4), 7.94 (d, 1H, indole-H6), 7.62 (d, 1H, indole-H7), 7.00–7.44 (m, 10H, Ar-H and 4H, pyridine-H), 6.00 (d, 1H, CHN), 5.60 (d, 1H, CHCO), 2.32 (s, 3H, CH3); Anal. Calcd. for C31H23N5O2: C, 74.83; H, 4.66; N, 14.08. Found: C, 7479; H, 4.62; N, 14.00%.4-(2′-Phenyl-1H-indol-3′-yl)-1-[5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]azetidin-2-one (5f), white solid, yield 75%, mp 261-62°C, Rf, 0.57 ethylacetate : benzene (9 : 1); IR (KBr): ν/cm−1 3415 (NH), 1718 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 12.15 (s, 1H, indole NH), 7.15–8.20 (m, 10H, Ar-H, 4H, indole-H and 4H, pyridine-H), 5.92 (d, 1H, CHN), 5.42 (d, 1H, CHCO); Anal. calcd. for C30H21N5O2: C, 74.52; H, 4.38; N, 14.48. Found: C, 74.50; H, 4.35; N, 14.42%.


## 5. Biological Activities

### 5.1. Antimicrobial Activities

All the synthesized compounds (3–5) were evaluated for their antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli (MTCC-723),Staphylococcus aureus(ATCC-29513),Klebsiella pneumoniae (NCTC-13368), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MTCC-1688) and their antifungal activity against Aspergillus niger(MTCC-281),Aspergillus oryzae(MTCC-3567T),Aspergillus terreus(MTCC-1782), and Aspergillus flavus (MTCC-1973) by the cup-plate method following reported procedure [34]. Holes of 6 mm diameter were punched carefully using a sterile cork borer, and these were filled with test solution (1000, 750, and 500 μg/mL in DMF), standard solution (1000, 750, and 500 μg/mL in DMF), and DMF as control. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hrs and 72 hrs in case of antibacterial and antifungal activity, respectively. The diameter of the zone of inhibition (in mm) for all the test compounds was measured, and the results were compared with the standard drugs streptomycin and fluconazole for antibacterial and antifungal activity, respectively. The results are tabulated in Tables 1 and 2.


### 5.2. Antioxidant Activity Assay

#### 5.2.1.1,1-Diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH) Radical Scavenging Activity (RSA)

The radical scavenging activity (RSA) of test compounds(3–5) in methanolic solution at concentrations 25, 50, 75, and 100 μg/mL containing freshly prepared DPPH solution (0.004% w/v) was carried out, and the results were compared with the standards BHA, TBHQ, and AA by using Hatano’s method [35]. All the test analyses were performed on three replicates and averaged. The results in percentage are expressed as the ratio of absorption in the presence of test compounds and absorption of DPPH solution in the absence of test compounds at 517 nm on ELICO SL171 mini spec spectrometer. The percentage scavenging activity of the DPPH free radical was determined using the following equation:
(2)%DPPHradicalscavenging=(Absorbanceofcontrol-Absorbanceoftestsample)Absorbanceofcontrol×100.
The results are shown in Figures 1 and 2.


#### 5.2.2. Ferric Ions (Fe3+) Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP)

The reducing power of the synthesized compounds(3–5) was determined according to the Oyaizu method [36]. Different concentrations of samples (25, 50, 75, and 100 μg/mL) in DMSO (1 mL) were mixed with phosphate buffer (2.5 mL, 0.2 M, pH 6.6) and potassium ferricyanide (2.5 mL, 1%). The mixture was incubated at 50°C for 20 mins. After which a portion of trichloroacetic acid (2.5 mL, 10%) was added to the mixture and centrifuged for 10 mins. at 1000 ×g. The upper layer of solution (2.5 mL) was mixed with distilled water (2.5 mL) and ferric chloride (0.5 mL, 0.1%). Then absorbance at 700 nm was measured in spectrophotometer. Higher absorbance of the reaction mixture indicated greater reducing power. The results are illustrated in Figures 3 and 4.


#### 5.2.3. Ferrous Ions (Fe2+) Metal-Chelating Activity

The chelating activity of ferrous ions by synthesized compounds(3–5) and standards was estimated by following the reported method [37]. The test samples (25, 50, 75, and 100 μg/mL) in ethanolic solution (0.4 mL) were added to a solution of ferrous chloride (0.05 mL, 2 mM). The reaction was initiated by the addition of ferrozine (0.2 mL, 5 mM), and the total volume was adjusted to 4 mL with ethanol. Ferrozine reacts with the divalent iron to form stable magenta complex species that were very soluble in water. The mixture was shaken vigorously and kept at room temperature for 10 mins. Then the absorbance of the solution was measured spectrophotometrically at 562 nm. All test analyses were run in triplicate and averaged. The percentage of inhibition of the ferrozine-Fe2+complex formations was calculated using the formula:
(3)Ferrousionchelatingeffect(%)=(Absorbanceofcontrol-Absorbanceoftestsample)Absorbanceofcontrol×100.
The results are exhibited in Figures 5 and 6.


## 5.1. Antimicrobial Activities

All the synthesized compounds (3–5) were evaluated for their antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli (MTCC-723),Staphylococcus aureus(ATCC-29513),Klebsiella pneumoniae (NCTC-13368), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MTCC-1688) and their antifungal activity against Aspergillus niger(MTCC-281),Aspergillus oryzae(MTCC-3567T),Aspergillus terreus(MTCC-1782), and Aspergillus flavus (MTCC-1973) by the cup-plate method following reported procedure [34]. Holes of 6 mm diameter were punched carefully using a sterile cork borer, and these were filled with test solution (1000, 750, and 500 μg/mL in DMF), standard solution (1000, 750, and 500 μg/mL in DMF), and DMF as control. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hrs and 72 hrs in case of antibacterial and antifungal activity, respectively. The diameter of the zone of inhibition (in mm) for all the test compounds was measured, and the results were compared with the standard drugs streptomycin and fluconazole for antibacterial and antifungal activity, respectively. The results are tabulated in Tables 1 and 2.


## 5.2. Antioxidant Activity Assay

### 5.2.1.1,1-Diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH) Radical Scavenging Activity (RSA)

The radical scavenging activity (RSA) of test compounds(3–5) in methanolic solution at concentrations 25, 50, 75, and 100 μg/mL containing freshly prepared DPPH solution (0.004% w/v) was carried out, and the results were compared with the standards BHA, TBHQ, and AA by using Hatano’s method [35]. All the test analyses were performed on three replicates and averaged. The results in percentage are expressed as the ratio of absorption in the presence of test compounds and absorption of DPPH solution in the absence of test compounds at 517 nm on ELICO SL171 mini spec spectrometer. The percentage scavenging activity of the DPPH free radical was determined using the following equation:
(2)%DPPHradicalscavenging=(Absorbanceofcontrol-Absorbanceoftestsample)Absorbanceofcontrol×100.
The results are shown in Figures 1 and 2.


### 5.2.2. Ferric Ions (Fe3+) Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP)

The reducing power of the synthesized compounds(3–5) was determined according to the Oyaizu method [36]. Different concentrations of samples (25, 50, 75, and 100 μg/mL) in DMSO (1 mL) were mixed with phosphate buffer (2.5 mL, 0.2 M, pH 6.6) and potassium ferricyanide (2.5 mL, 1%). The mixture was incubated at 50°C for 20 mins. After which a portion of trichloroacetic acid (2.5 mL, 10%) was added to the mixture and centrifuged for 10 mins. at 1000 ×g. The upper layer of solution (2.5 mL) was mixed with distilled water (2.5 mL) and ferric chloride (0.5 mL, 0.1%). Then absorbance at 700 nm was measured in spectrophotometer. Higher absorbance of the reaction mixture indicated greater reducing power. The results are illustrated in Figures 3 and 4.


### 5.2.3. Ferrous Ions (Fe2+) Metal-Chelating Activity

The chelating activity of ferrous ions by synthesized compounds(3–5) and standards was estimated by following the reported method [37]. The test samples (25, 50, 75, and 100 μg/mL) in ethanolic solution (0.4 mL) were added to a solution of ferrous chloride (0.05 mL, 2 mM). The reaction was initiated by the addition of ferrozine (0.2 mL, 5 mM), and the total volume was adjusted to 4 mL with ethanol. Ferrozine reacts with the divalent iron to form stable magenta complex species that were very soluble in water. The mixture was shaken vigorously and kept at room temperature for 10 mins. Then the absorbance of the solution was measured spectrophotometrically at 562 nm. All test analyses were run in triplicate and averaged. The percentage of inhibition of the ferrozine-Fe2+complex formations was calculated using the formula:
(3)Ferrousionchelatingeffect(%)=(Absorbanceofcontrol-Absorbanceoftestsample)Absorbanceofcontrol×100.
The results are exhibited in Figures 5 and 6.


## 5.2.1.1,1-Diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH) Radical Scavenging Activity (RSA)

The radical scavenging activity (RSA) of test compounds(3–5) in methanolic solution at concentrations 25, 50, 75, and 100 μg/mL containing freshly prepared DPPH solution (0.004% w/v) was carried out, and the results were compared with the standards BHA, TBHQ, and AA by using Hatano’s method [35]. All the test analyses were performed on three replicates and averaged. The results in percentage are expressed as the ratio of absorption in the presence of test compounds and absorption of DPPH solution in the absence of test compounds at 517 nm on ELICO SL171 mini spec spectrometer. The percentage scavenging activity of the DPPH free radical was determined using the following equation:
(2)%DPPHradicalscavenging=(Absorbanceofcontrol-Absorbanceoftestsample)Absorbanceofcontrol×100.
The results are shown in Figures 1 and 2.


## 5.2.2. Ferric Ions (Fe3+) Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP)

The reducing power of the synthesized compounds(3–5) was determined according to the Oyaizu method [36]. Different concentrations of samples (25, 50, 75, and 100 μg/mL) in DMSO (1 mL) were mixed with phosphate buffer (2.5 mL, 0.2 M, pH 6.6) and potassium ferricyanide (2.5 mL, 1%). The mixture was incubated at 50°C for 20 mins. After which a portion of trichloroacetic acid (2.5 mL, 10%) was added to the mixture and centrifuged for 10 mins. at 1000 ×g. The upper layer of solution (2.5 mL) was mixed with distilled water (2.5 mL) and ferric chloride (0.5 mL, 0.1%). Then absorbance at 700 nm was measured in spectrophotometer. Higher absorbance of the reaction mixture indicated greater reducing power. The results are illustrated in Figures 3 and 4.


## 5.2.3. Ferrous Ions (Fe2+) Metal-Chelating Activity

The chelating activity of ferrous ions by synthesized compounds(3–5) and standards was estimated by following the reported method [37]. The test samples (25, 50, 75, and 100 μg/mL) in ethanolic solution (0.4 mL) were added to a solution of ferrous chloride (0.05 mL, 2 mM). The reaction was initiated by the addition of ferrozine (0.2 mL, 5 mM), and the total volume was adjusted to 4 mL with ethanol. Ferrozine reacts with the divalent iron to form stable magenta complex species that were very soluble in water. The mixture was shaken vigorously and kept at room temperature for 10 mins. Then the absorbance of the solution was measured spectrophotometrically at 562 nm. All test analyses were run in triplicate and averaged. The percentage of inhibition of the ferrozine-Fe2+complex formations was calculated using the formula:
(3)Ferrousionchelatingeffect(%)=(Absorbanceofcontrol-Absorbanceoftestsample)Absorbanceofcontrol×100.
The results are exhibited in Figures 5 and 6.



---

*Source: 718937-2013-02-28.xml*