# Arsenic, Chromium, and Other Potentially Toxic Elements in the Rocks and Sediments of Oropos-Kalamos Basin, Attica, Greece

Authors: D. Alexakis; D. Gamvroula
Journal: Applied and Environmental Soil Science
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

Rocks and sediments are non-anthropogenic sources of elements contamination. In this study, a series of potentially toxic elements were quantified in rocks and sediments of the Oropos-Kalamos basin. Only As, Hg, Pb, and Sb contents, in all the examined rocks and sediments, were higher than the levels given in international literature. Concentration of the elements As, Cr, Hg, Mo, Ni, and U is highly elevated in the lignite compared to crustal element averages. The enrichment of Cr and Ni in the lignite can be attributed to the known ultramafic rock masses surrounding the basin, while enrichment of As, Hg, Mo, Sb, and U is associated with the past geothermal activity of the Upper Miocene (about 15 million years ago). Nickel and Cr were transported into the lignite deposition basin by rivers and streams draining ultramafic rock bodies. The results of this study imply the natural source of Cr3+ and Cr6+ contamination of the Oropos-Kalamos groundwater, since high Cr contents were also recorded in the lignite (212.3 mg kg−1), chromiferous iron ore occurrences (256.6 mg kg−1), and alluvial deposits (212.5 mg kg−1), indicating Cr leaching and transportation to the depositional basin dating from the Upper Miocene age.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Many chemical compounds, major elements, and trace metals appear in waters and soils through agricultural, industrial, municipal activities, and natural processes [1–7]. In this way, there is an increase in the number of research studies dealing with degradation of water and soil quality [8–14], as well as with the levels of elements in vegetables [15] and biological samples [16]. Since, according to Salomons [17], 99.9% of the metals are stored in soils and sediments, the high storage capacity of these materials plays an important role in controlling the fate and transport of the metals. Based on these fundamentals, the investigation of the composition of soils-sediments-rocks is very important to determine the natural influences on water quality.A previous study concerning the groundwater quality of the Oropos-Kalamos basin has been conducted by Stamatis et al. [14]. In that study elevated contents have been recorded for the following trace elements: As, Co, Crtotal, Cr6+, Mn, Pb, U, and V in the groundwater of Oropos-Kalamos basin. Furthermore, Stamatis et al. [14] applied speciation analysis and statistical treatment techniques in order to identify the factors controlling the elevated element contents in Oropos-Kalamos groundwater without, however, mentioning or investigating the composition of the representative solid materials (rocks, sediments, and soils) outcropping in the area studied.The aim of this paper is, firstly, to evaluate the occurrence of trace elements in the representative samples from regional rocks and sediments, and, secondly, to define relationships between the trace element contents in the system: rock-sediment-groundwater.Needless to say, that risk assessment of trace element contamination has become an important research topic dealing mainly with food quality and safety, health-related issues in humans, and environmental issues throughout the world. Recent developments in the field of risk assessment include research studies by:(i)
Komnitsas and Modis [18], who assessed the risk related to As and Zn contamination in a coal mining region using variography analysis and numerical modelling;
(ii)
Komnitsas and Modis [19], who estimated the risk at waste disposal sites in the presence of hotspots;
(iii)
Vacca et al. [20], who investigated the total content of heavy metals in contaminated soils of the Rio Sitzerri floodplain (Sardinia, Italy) and discussed their impact on pedodiversity;
(iv)
Roy and McDonald [21], who studied the metal uptake in plants and assessed the health risk in metal-contaminated smelter soils;
(v)
Fernández-Calviño et al. [22], who studied the spatial variability of total copper, exchangeable copper, and bioavailable copper in a vineyard soil by applying statistical and geostatistical methods.The results of this study will assist the local decision makers and regulators, firstly, to better understand the processes controlling the migration of trace elements into the Oropos-Kalamos basin and, secondly, to reduce environmental risk by selecting the best management practices.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Description of the Study Area

The study area lies between latitudes of 38°14′–38°21′ and longitudes of 23°44′–23°52′ (Figure1), being about 50 km north from Athens, the capital of the Greek Republic. It has an area of 80 km2 approximately.Figure 1
Location map of the area studied.Geological formations which are observed in the study area include (Figure2) schists, limestones, volcano-sedimentary formations, chromiferous iron ore occurrences, ultramafic rock masses, flysch, conglomerates, marly limestones with travertines, marly formations with lignite intercalations, and alluvial deposits [23–25]. The geology and lithology of the Oropos-Kalamos basin have been extensively presented in our previous study [14].Figure 2
A simplified geological map of the Oropos-Kalamos area [23, 25] showing lignite tailings, excavated lignite ore occurrences, and sampling sites.Corine land cover was used for obtaining the land use data [26]. The land use of the study area was classified into the following categories (Figure 3): (1) urban, (2) agricultural, (3) forest, shrub, and sparse vegetation, and (4) wetlands. The area studied includes the villages of Skala Oropou, Nea Palatia, Asprochori, Milesi, Mavrosouvala, and Kalamos and the cities of Oropos and Markopoulo. The agricultural land in Oropos-Kalamos basin is characterized by intensive agricultural activities especially vineyards, vegetables, and olive oil trees (Figure 3). Extensive lignite mining has occurred in the southeastern part of the study area since 1870 up to the 1960s. As a result of the mining activities, great amounts of waste produced from lignite mining activities were deposited in piles around the mining areas (Figure 3). There is a lack of industrial activities in Oropos-Kalamos basin.Figure 3
Map showing the land uses of the study area, rivers, streams, and names of the cities and villages.


### 2.2. Sampling and Laboratory Procedures

The rock-sediment sampling program was conducted with a total of eleven(
11
) sampling sites (Figure 2). During the sampling process simultaneous site surveys were carried out in order to provide site specific information relating to industrial and agricultural activities near the sampling sites. Sampling sites were recorded in the field by using a Garmin eMap geographical positioning system (GPS). Rock and sediment bulk samples were collected from different lithological formations in order to be representative of the solid phases in contact with groundwater. Each sample collected comprised at least five subsamples that were homogenized into a single bulk sample which was about 2 kg. Specifically, two bulk samples were collected from lignites (RS1 and RS2), two bulk samples were taken from chromiferous iron ore occurrences (RS3 and RS4), two bulk samples were collected from marly formation (RS5 and RS6), three bulk samples were taken from conglomerates (RS7, RS8, and RS9), and two bulk samples were collected from alluvial deposits (RS10 and RS11) (Figure 2).Bulk lignite samples were collected from the abandoned lignite mines vicinity. The surface of sampling sites was cleaned from vegetation and superficial debris before sampling by using a polypropylene tool and the samples were stored into clean polyethylene (PE) bags. Marly and conglomerate formation samples were taken from rock surface by using a hammer. The bulk lignite, chromiferous iron ore, marly, and conglomerate formation samples were air-dried at room temperature (<25°C), crushed, and grounded to <0.200 mm. Furthermore, the rock and sediment samples were quartered prior to chemical analysis. Contact with metals was avoided throughout samples preparation to avoid metal contamination. The homogenized and pulverized samples were digested with a mixed-acid attack employing concentrated HNO3 and concentrated HCl. The resulting solutions were analyzed for Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Pb, and Zn by atomic absorption spectroscopy method (AAS) using a GBC 908AA model at the Laboratory of Geology of the Agricultural University of Athens and for Ag, Al, As, Au, B, Ba, Bi, Ca, Ga, Hg, K, La, Mg, Mo, Na, Ni, P, S, Sb, Sc, Se, Sr, Te, Th, Ti, Tl, U, V, and W by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) at the ACME Analytical Laboratories Ltd., Vancouver, Canada (ISO 9002 Accredited Co.). Chemical analyses were monitored by using reference samples of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Montana soil reference sample SRM 2710 was routinely analyzed to determine analytical errors (accuracy 5–9%). Triplicate measurements were conducted for 10% of the analyzed samples (precision 2–4%).Homogenized and pulverized representative rock and sediment subsamples were made into pressed powder pellets and analyzed by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) using an automated Siemens D5005 diffractometer. The scanning electron microscopic (SEM) analysis was used as a complementary technique with XRD analysis. Representative sediment and rock subsamples were examined by using a SEM model JEOL JSM-5600. An energy dispersive X-ray detector (EDX) Oxford Link ISIS 300 was used for the qualitative analysis of some spots of the rock and sediment samples. The XRD and SEM analysis were performed at the Laboratory of Economic Geology and Geochemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. Minerals were identified on the basis of morphology and SEM-EDX chemistry.


### 2.3. Statistical Treatment and Spatial Analysis

The geochemical data were treated using the Microsoft Excel software package. A geographic information system (GIS) platform was created using ArcGIS 10.0 software (ESRI). The GIS platform includes basic layers showing the lithology, rivers, streams, and cities/villages locations. Sampling site locations, lignite tailings, and excavated lignite ore occurrences have been also plotted on additional information layers of the GIS.


## 2.1. Description of the Study Area

The study area lies between latitudes of 38°14′–38°21′ and longitudes of 23°44′–23°52′ (Figure1), being about 50 km north from Athens, the capital of the Greek Republic. It has an area of 80 km2 approximately.Figure 1
Location map of the area studied.Geological formations which are observed in the study area include (Figure2) schists, limestones, volcano-sedimentary formations, chromiferous iron ore occurrences, ultramafic rock masses, flysch, conglomerates, marly limestones with travertines, marly formations with lignite intercalations, and alluvial deposits [23–25]. The geology and lithology of the Oropos-Kalamos basin have been extensively presented in our previous study [14].Figure 2
A simplified geological map of the Oropos-Kalamos area [23, 25] showing lignite tailings, excavated lignite ore occurrences, and sampling sites.Corine land cover was used for obtaining the land use data [26]. The land use of the study area was classified into the following categories (Figure 3): (1) urban, (2) agricultural, (3) forest, shrub, and sparse vegetation, and (4) wetlands. The area studied includes the villages of Skala Oropou, Nea Palatia, Asprochori, Milesi, Mavrosouvala, and Kalamos and the cities of Oropos and Markopoulo. The agricultural land in Oropos-Kalamos basin is characterized by intensive agricultural activities especially vineyards, vegetables, and olive oil trees (Figure 3). Extensive lignite mining has occurred in the southeastern part of the study area since 1870 up to the 1960s. As a result of the mining activities, great amounts of waste produced from lignite mining activities were deposited in piles around the mining areas (Figure 3). There is a lack of industrial activities in Oropos-Kalamos basin.Figure 3
Map showing the land uses of the study area, rivers, streams, and names of the cities and villages.


## 2.2. Sampling and Laboratory Procedures

The rock-sediment sampling program was conducted with a total of eleven(
11
) sampling sites (Figure 2). During the sampling process simultaneous site surveys were carried out in order to provide site specific information relating to industrial and agricultural activities near the sampling sites. Sampling sites were recorded in the field by using a Garmin eMap geographical positioning system (GPS). Rock and sediment bulk samples were collected from different lithological formations in order to be representative of the solid phases in contact with groundwater. Each sample collected comprised at least five subsamples that were homogenized into a single bulk sample which was about 2 kg. Specifically, two bulk samples were collected from lignites (RS1 and RS2), two bulk samples were taken from chromiferous iron ore occurrences (RS3 and RS4), two bulk samples were collected from marly formation (RS5 and RS6), three bulk samples were taken from conglomerates (RS7, RS8, and RS9), and two bulk samples were collected from alluvial deposits (RS10 and RS11) (Figure 2).Bulk lignite samples were collected from the abandoned lignite mines vicinity. The surface of sampling sites was cleaned from vegetation and superficial debris before sampling by using a polypropylene tool and the samples were stored into clean polyethylene (PE) bags. Marly and conglomerate formation samples were taken from rock surface by using a hammer. The bulk lignite, chromiferous iron ore, marly, and conglomerate formation samples were air-dried at room temperature (<25°C), crushed, and grounded to <0.200 mm. Furthermore, the rock and sediment samples were quartered prior to chemical analysis. Contact with metals was avoided throughout samples preparation to avoid metal contamination. The homogenized and pulverized samples were digested with a mixed-acid attack employing concentrated HNO3 and concentrated HCl. The resulting solutions were analyzed for Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Pb, and Zn by atomic absorption spectroscopy method (AAS) using a GBC 908AA model at the Laboratory of Geology of the Agricultural University of Athens and for Ag, Al, As, Au, B, Ba, Bi, Ca, Ga, Hg, K, La, Mg, Mo, Na, Ni, P, S, Sb, Sc, Se, Sr, Te, Th, Ti, Tl, U, V, and W by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) at the ACME Analytical Laboratories Ltd., Vancouver, Canada (ISO 9002 Accredited Co.). Chemical analyses were monitored by using reference samples of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Montana soil reference sample SRM 2710 was routinely analyzed to determine analytical errors (accuracy 5–9%). Triplicate measurements were conducted for 10% of the analyzed samples (precision 2–4%).Homogenized and pulverized representative rock and sediment subsamples were made into pressed powder pellets and analyzed by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) using an automated Siemens D5005 diffractometer. The scanning electron microscopic (SEM) analysis was used as a complementary technique with XRD analysis. Representative sediment and rock subsamples were examined by using a SEM model JEOL JSM-5600. An energy dispersive X-ray detector (EDX) Oxford Link ISIS 300 was used for the qualitative analysis of some spots of the rock and sediment samples. The XRD and SEM analysis were performed at the Laboratory of Economic Geology and Geochemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. Minerals were identified on the basis of morphology and SEM-EDX chemistry.


## 2.3. Statistical Treatment and Spatial Analysis

The geochemical data were treated using the Microsoft Excel software package. A geographic information system (GIS) platform was created using ArcGIS 10.0 software (ESRI). The GIS platform includes basic layers showing the lithology, rivers, streams, and cities/villages locations. Sampling site locations, lignite tailings, and excavated lignite ore occurrences have been also plotted on additional information layers of the GIS.


## 3. Results and Discussion

The mineral phases detected in the bulk lignite samples by XRD analyses are calcite, illite, gypsum, and montmorillonite. The XRD analysis of chromiferous iron ore occurrences was dominated by chlorite, illite, iron oxides, montmorillonite, and quartz, while ankerite and dolomite were detected in the marly formation samples.The SEM observation and microanalysis results indicated the presence of calcite, organic matter, and pyrite in the bulk lignite samples as framboids and as isolated euhedral forms (Figure4). The SEM examination of the chromiferous iron oxide samples shows the presence of chromite, hematite, illite, and quartz (Figure 5).Modes of occurrence of pyrite in Oropos-Kalamos lignite of Upper Miocene age (SEM backscattered electron images). (a) Pyrite as framboid, organic matter, and quartz; (b) pyrite as euhedral, calcite, and organic matter.
(a)
(b)SEM images of chromiferous iron ore occurrences of Oropos-Kalamos area showing (a) hematite, illite, and quartz and (b) chromite, illite, and quartz.
(a)
(b)Since Cr-Ni bearing minerals were not detected by XRD of bulk lignite samples, indicating that their concentrations are below the detection limits (±2 wt%) of the analytical technique, it is possible that some of the Cr and Ni have been transported into the lignite deposition basin as Cr3+ and Ni2+ in solution from ground or surface waters that drained the ultramafic rock masses at Oropos-Kalamos basin. Similar enrichment mechanisms have been postulated for Ni-rich lignite [27, 28]. Furthermore, high Cr and Ni contents of natural origin due to the weathering of ultramafic rock masses, ranging from 277 to 404 mg kg−1 and from 246 to 671 mg kg−1, respectively, were also recorded at the coastal sediments of Evoikos Gulf [29].The presence of pyrite as framboids and as isolated euhedral forms in Oropos-Kalamos bulk-lignite samples supports the hypothesis that pyrite is of syngenetic origin as a result of the reaction between ferrous ions, sulfur ions, and elemental sulfur by bacterial reduction in the reducing deposition environment. It could be suggested that the mechanism of pyrite (FeS2) formation in the lignite of the study area is illustrated by the following reactions:
(1)
2
Fe
3
+
+
S
2
-
⟶
S
0
+
2
Fe
2
+
,
(2)
Fe
2
+
+
HS
-
⟶
FeS
+
H
+
,
(3)
FeS
+
S
0
⟶
FeS
2
.Furthermore, occurrences of pyrite in framboidal and euhedral forms have been also recorded in lignite deposits of Plakias-Lefkogia, Greece [30], and only as framboidal form in molassic sediments of the Evros area, Greece [31]. Pyrite of syngenetic origin in lignite is also reported for Yashan coalfield, China [32], and Megalopolis basin, Greece [33]. The absence of As from pyrite supports the hypothesis that As which is recorded in the bulk lignite samples of Oropos-Kalamos is mainly associated with the organic matter.The mean values of the chemical composition of Oropos-Kalamos samples and the calculated enrichment factors are tabulated in Table1.Table 1
Mean values of the chemical composition of the examined samples in comparison with element contents obtained by other studies [34–36] and enrichment factors (EF).
Units
DL
Bulk lignite
Chromiferous iron ore occurrences
Marly formation
Conglomerates
Alluvial
Elassona lignite mean [34]
World Coal [35]
Crustal average [36]
EF 1
EF 2
EF 3
EF 4
EF 5
Ag
μg kg−1
2
44
87
10
14
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Al
%
0.01
0.74
2.21
0.07
0.73
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
As
mg kg−1
0.1
226.2
39.8
12.1
34.8
—
32
10
1.8
125.7
22.1
6.7
19.3
—
Au
μg kg−1
0.2
2.9
2.1
0.9
1.9
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
B
mg kg−1
20
56
20
24
20
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Ba
mg kg−1
0.5
30.7
135.8
58.2
60.5
—
—
200
—
—
—
—
—
—
Bi
mg kg−1
0.02
0.2
0.33
0.02
0.09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Ca
%
0.01
2.01
2.35
20.69
13.86
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Cd
mg kg−1
0.01
0.69
0.55
0.02
0.1
0.01
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Co
mg kg−1
0.1
23.7
38.3
1.5
9.8
38.25
26
5
25
1.0
1.5
0.1
0.4
1.5
Cr
mg kg−1
0.5
212.3
256.6
4.6
69.7
212.5
119
20
100
2.1
2.6
0.1
0.7
2.1
Cu
mg kg−1
0.01
32.44
27.9
1.85
21.11
27.3
119
15
55
0.6
0.5
0.0
0.4
0.5
Fe
%
0.01
2.92
4.36
0.1
2.04
3.81
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Ga
mg kg−1
0.1
3.3
7.2
0.2
2
—
25
—
15
—
0.5
0.0
0.1
—
Hg
μg kg−1
5
267
29.5
5
20
—
0.3
—
0.08
3337.5
368.8
62.5
250.0
—
K
%
0.01
0.06
0.3
0.02
0.07
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
La
mg kg−1
0.5
9.9
22.3
0.5
5.8
—
77
—
30
0.3
0.7
0.0
0.2
—
Mg
%
0.01
0.33
0.51
9.99
0.71
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Mn
mg kg−1
1
94
1252
134
380
707.7
920
70
1000
0.1
1.3
0.1
0.4
0.7
Mo
mg kg−1
0.01
7.63
0.51
0.12
0.24
—
15
3
1.5
5.1
0.3
0.1
0.2
—
Na
%
0.001
0.039
0.009
0.109
0.011
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Ni
mg kg−1
0.1
415.9
293.9
4.8
69.1
—
88
—
75
5.6
3.9
0.1
0.9
—
P
%
0.001
0.041
0.045
0.005
0.046
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Pb
mg kg−1
0.01
20.24
31.29
3.01
30.85
24.54
57
—
13
1.6
2.4
0.2
2.4
1.9
S
%
0.02
2.75
0.03
0.02
0.04
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Sb
mg kg−1
0.02
4.97
0.29
0.2
0.32
—
3
1
0.2
24.9
1.5
1.0
1.6
—
Sc
mg kg−1
0.1
5.3
6.8
0.3
1.7
—
23
4
22
0.2
0.3
0.0
0.1
—
Se
mg kg−1
0.1
4.3
0.8
0.3
0.6
—
—
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
Sr
mg kg−1
0.5
365.4
13.4
910
123.6
—
608
—
375
1.0
0.0
2.4
0.3
—
Te
mg kg−1
0.02
0.12
0.03
0.06
0.02
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Th
mg kg−1
0.1
1.8
5.6
0.2
1.4
—
25
4
7.2
0.3
0.8
0.0
0.2
—
Ti
%
0.001
0.011
0.014
0.001
0.008
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Tl
mg kg−1
0.02
1.61
0.3
0.03
0.05
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
U
mg kg−1
0.1
8.8
0.5
1.4
0.3
—
7
2
1.8
4.9
0.3
0.8
0.2
—
V
mg kg−1
2
225
65
3
14
—
187
40
135
1.7
0.5
0.0
0.1
—
W
mg kg−1
0.1
4.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Zn
mg kg−1
0.1
38.9
72.4
4
63.52
92.8
176
50
70
0.6
1.0
0.1
0.9
1.3
DL: detection limit, EF 1: lignite compared to crustal average, EF 2: chromiferous iron ore compared to crustal average, EF 3: marly formation compared to crustal average,  EF 4:  conglomerates compared to crustal average, and EF 5: alluvial compared to crustal average.The mean concentrations of As, Cr, Hg, Ni, Sb, U, and V in the Oropos-Kalamos lignite were significantly higher than those in the Elassona lignite given by Pentari et al. [34] (Table 1). Furthermore, the elements As, Co, Cr, Cu, Mn, Mo, Sb, Sc, Se, U, and V contents were higher than those in the World Coal reported by Clarke and Sloss [35]. Compared to the crustal average, the elements As, Cr, Hg, Mo, Ni, Sb, and U contents of lignite show enrichment factors varying between 2.1 and 3337.5 (Table 1). Enrichment factor (EF) is defined as the ratio of a measured element content to that of crustal average. The composition of the Earth’s crust, reported by Mason and Moore [36], has been used for the calculations of enrichment factors. An element which shows enrichment factor higher than 2 can be considered enriched [34]. Enrichment factors higher than 2 are presented by using bold type characters (Table 1).The enrichment of As, Hg, Mo, Sb, and U of the Oropos-Kalamos bulk-lignite samples can be attributed to geothermal activity that took place during the Upper Miocene in the Oropos-Kalamos basin, a fact that can be confirmed by the outcropping of travertine in the study area. Arsenic, Hg, Mo, Sb, and U enrichment by geothermal activity has been also reported for other Greek lignite, for example, Pentari et al. [34]. Moreover, the Cr and Ni enrichment of the bulk-lignite samples of Oropos-Kalamos basin is associated with ultramafic rock masses observed in the western part of the lignite deposition basin.The elements As, Cr, Hg, Ni, and Pb concentrations appear to be highly enriched in the chromiferous iron ore occurrences, while the elements Co, Mn, Sb, and Zn present enrichment factors ranging from 1.0 to 1.5. The elements As, Hg, and Sr can be considered enriched in marly formation (Table1). Furthermore, the elements As, Hg, and Pb contents in conglomerates can also be considered enriched, while the content of Sb is higher than that of the Earth’s crust [36]. Chromium appears to be enriched in the alluvial deposits, while Co, Pb, and Zn show concentrations higher than the Earth’s crust (enrichment factors between 1.3 and 1.9) (Table 1). Since there are no known industrial sources of trace element contamination in the study area, the anthropogenic origin of elevated element contents such as As, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mo, Pb, U, and V can be excluded.In the study area, the heavy influence of the composition of the rocks and sediments on the groundwater quality is recorded by our previous study [14]. Furthermore, Stamatis et al. [14] reported elevated As (up to 246 μg kg−1), Cr6+ (up to 28 μg kg−1), Crtotal (up to 34 μg kg−1), Fe (up to 2486 μg kg−1), Mn (up to 132 μg kg−1), U (up to 14 μg kg−1), V (up to 19 μg kg−1), and Zn (up to 974 μg kg−1) concentrations in Oropos-Kalamos groundwater.


## 4. Conclusions

The syngenetic origin of pyrite in lignites of Oropos-Kalamos basin is supported by its presence as framboids and as isolated euhedral forms. The absence of As from pyrite supports the hypothesis that As is mainly associated with the organic matter of lignite. Concentrations of potentially hazardous elements such as As, Cr, Hg, Mo, Ni, Sb, and U are highly enriched in the Oropos-Kalamos lignite compared to crustal element averages. The mean contents of As, Cr, Sb, U, and V in the Oropos-Kalamos lignite were significantly higher than those reported for the Elassona lignite (Greece) and the World Coal. The distribution of trace elements in the Oropos-Kalamos lignite shows that the enrichment of Cr and Ni can be attributed to the known ultramafic rock masses surrounding the lignite basin, while enrichment of As, Hg, Mo, Sb, and U of Oropos-Kalamos lignite is associated with the past geothermal activity of Upper Miocene. Nickel and Cr were transported into the Oropos-Kalamos lignite deposition basin by rivers and streams draining ultramafic rock bodies. Therefore the high contents of As, U, and V in the Oropos-Kalamos lignite result in the high As, U, and V contents in the groundwater. The observation of elevated mean contents of As, Hg, Pb, and Sb in all the examined rock and sediments, in combination with the lack of known industrial source of contamination, indicates the natural source of contamination in the area studied.The results of this study imply the natural source of Cr3+ and Cr6+ contamination of the Oropos-Kalamos groundwater since high chromium contents were recorded also in the Oropos-Kalamos lignite, chromiferous iron ore occurrences, and alluvial deposits, indicating Cr leaching and transportation by rivers and ephemeral streams to the depositional basin dating from the Upper Miocene age (about 15 million years ago).Future work could focus on assessing the risk at the Oropos-Kalamos basin by applying a soil geochemical survey and delineating the spatial variability of the total element soil contents as well as their bioavailable fraction. The risks posed to humans, grazing animals, and other organisms from exposure to the concentrations of trace elements should be further investigated.



---

*Source: 718534-2014-05-06.xml*