# Z-Ligustilide Exerted Hormetic Effect on Growth and Detoxification Enzymes ofSpodoptera litura Larvae

Authors: Yang Yi; Guojun Dou; Zanyang Yu; Hui He; Chengqiang Wang; Li Li; Jia Zhou; Dejun Liu; Jianyou Shi; Guanrong Li; Lei Pang; Na Yang; Qinwan Huang; Hongyi Qi
Journal: Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

Plants have evolved a variety of phytochemicals to defense insect feeding, whereas insects have also evolved diverse detoxification enzymes, which are adaptively induced as a prosurvival mechanism. Herein, Z-ligustilide inLigusticum chuanxiong Hort. was found to exhibit a similar trend in the accumulation from December to May as the occurrence ofSpodoptera litura (Fabricius) larvae. Importantly,S. lituralarvae feeding enhanced Z-ligustilide level in the stem and leaf (p < 0.01). Moreover, Z-ligustilide ranging from 1 to 5 mg·g−1 exhibited remarkable larvicidal activity, antifeedant activity, and growth inhibition againstS. lituralarvae. The LC50 values of larvicidal activity for phthalides inL. chuanxiong were compared as follows: Z-ligustilide > levistilide A > senkyunolide A > 3-butylidenephthalide > senkyunolide I, implicating the critical role of conjugated structure. Notably, there was a biphasic dose response for glutathione S-transferase (GST), cytochrome P450 (CYP) 450, Acetylcholinesterase (AChE), and Carboxylesterase (CarE) activities and GSTs1, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 4S9, and CYP4M14 mRNA expression. Particularly, low dose (0.1 mg·g−1) of Z-ligustilide conferred the resistance ofS. lituralarvae against chlorpyrifos (p < 0.05). Together, our data suggest that Z-ligustilide may function in a hormetic way in the chemical defense ofL. chuanxiong againstS. lituralarvae.


---

## Body

## 1. Background

Plants have evolved a variety of phytochemicals that play a chemical defense role against diverse stresses, particularly insect feeding [1, 2]. It has been well-established that noxious phytochemicals may serve as botanical insecticides due to their good efficacy and environmentally friendly [2]. Importantly, it has also been gradually recognized that phytochemicals produced by plants under stress environment can activate mild cellular stress response mechanisms at a subtoxic level in humans, which may enhance the tolerance against severe dysfunction or disease [3–5], which belongs to a phenomenon of hormesis that is characterized by a biphasic dose response [6]. This is supported by the fact that humans share a great deal of biological similarities to insects, which has established a close coevolutionary relationship with plants over 4 billion years, due to the common ancestor of all multicellular organisms, evolutionary conservation, and adaptive convergence [7, 8].Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort. is a well-known Chinese medicinal and edible plant of the family Apiaceae and mainly produced in Sichuan province [9].Rhizoma Chuanxiong is the dried rootstock ofL. chuanxiong and traditionally used as an herbal medicine with beneficial effects for stroke, migraine, and gynecological disorders. Moreover,Rhizoma Chuanxiongis frequently stewed with chicken or fish as food therapy. Z-Ligustilide (Z-LIG) is a phthalide compound and accounts for the highest content in the essential oil ofL. chuanxiong [10].Recently, we and other investigators found that Z-LIG is one of main components responsible for the neuroprotection ofRhizoma Chuanxiong against ischemic stroke [11–16]. In particular, our investigations demonstrated that pretreatment with Z-LIG remarkably enhanced the tolerance of neuron-like PC12 cells and rats against ischemic injury through activating the cellular stress response pathways Nrf2 and HSP70 [14–16]. Thus, it is possible that Z-LIG belongs to hormetic phytochemicals. In previous screening studies of agrochemicals, Z-LIG exhibited strong insecticidal activity againstDrosophila melanogaster[17, 18], mosquito larvae [19], andBemisia tabaci[20]. However, it is still totally unknown whether Z-LIG plays a defense role inL. chuanxiong against diverse stresses, especially, insect feeding.Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a regular polyphagous and damaging insect and distributed in the tropical and subtropical areas around the world [21, 22]. The wide outbreak ofS. lituramay be attributed to its migration, high reproductive performance, and detoxification mechanisms [23, 24]. Most recently, a recombinant protein of α-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor cloned fromRhizoma Chuanxiongexhibited potent inhibition against α-amylase and subtilisin A fromS. lituralarvae, indicating the defense mechanisms againstS. litura existing inL. chuanxiong [22]. Curiously, little attention until now has been given to the occurrence ofS. lituralarvae inL. chuanxiongand the chemical defense role of phytochemicals, such as Z-LIG, inL. chuanxiong againstS. lituralarvae.In the current study, we first determined the potential relationship between the accumulation of Z-LIG and the occurrence ofS. lituralarvae inL. chuanxiong. Then, the larvicidal activity, antifeedant activity, and growth inhibition of Z-LIG againstS. lituralarvae were evaluated. Moreover, influence of Z-LIG on the activities and/or the expression of detoxification enzymes inS. lituralarvae was further examined. Finally, whether low dose of Z-LIG leads to the resistance ofS. lituralarvae against chlorpyrifos was particularly explored.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Chemicals

Z-LIG, levistilide A, senkyunolide A, senkyunolide I, and 3-butylidenephthalide were obtained from Chengdu Chroma-Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China), and stored at -80°C before use. Chlorpyrifos (O,O-diethyl O-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridyl phosphorothioate, CPF) was purchased from J&K Scientific Ltd. (Beijing, China).


### 2.2. Extraction of Essential Oil

The plant material ofL. chuanxiong was collected and separated as two parts, the rhizome and the stem and leaf. After weighing, the samples were extracted through the hydrodistillation process in a Clevenger Apparatus with continuous ice-cold water circulation in condenser. The volatile fraction was collected in dichloromethane and concentrated by a Buchi rotavapour system with water bath temperature no more than 25±1°C.


### 2.3. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS)

The Z-LIG level in in the essential oils was analyzed by GC-MS. The system consists of an Agilent 6890 type gas chromatograph and an Agilent 5975N mass spectrometer, which equips with an Agilent HP-5MS 5% Phenyl Methyl Siloxane (30 m × 0.25μm × 250 μm). The analytical conditions are shown as follows: oven and initial temperature = 60°C for 3 min, ramp at 8°C/min to 180°C, then ramp at 5°C/min to 240°C; injection temperature = 230°C; injection volume = 1 μL (1:1000 diluted in acetone); carrier gas = He; flow rate = 1.5 mL/min; solvent delay= 0 min; transfer temperature = 250°C; source temperature = 230°C; ionization, electron impact; ion energy = 70 eV; scan range, 30-500 Da. To quantify the content of Z-LIG, standard compound of Z-LIG with purity more than 98% was used in GC-MS analysis. Z-LIG was identified based on the retention time and mass spectral comparison with standard compound.


### 2.4. Insect Rearing

Eggs ofS. liturawere originally collected from field ofL. chuanxiong. Then, the rearing was carried out in our laboratory under constant conditions: 27 ± 1°C, RH 60-70%, and 12L:12D photoperiod. To maintain the generation of insects, female and male moths with the same number were caged in a 10 cm diameter beaker supplied with honey solution (10%) and permitted to copulate for 48 h. Eggs were then laid by female moths on wax paper. Upon egg hatching,S. litura larvae were fed on standard artificial diet [25].


### 2.5. Larvicidal Activity

Test compounds were dissolved in 200μL of DMSO and mixed thoroughly with 100g artificial diet. The artificial diet with DMSO only was used as control diet. The artificial diet with different doses of compounds or control diet was placed into Petri dishes (9 cm × 1.5 cm), respectively. The third instar larvae that already starved for 4 h were introduced into each Petri dish. After 72 h, the diet was replaced with normal diet. Another 6 days later, mortality of the larvae was checked, and larvae showed that the inability to move was scored as dead. A total of 20 larvae were used in each triplicate. Abbott’s formula [26] was applied to calculate the corrected mortality as follows:P=(T-C)/(100-C)×100, whereP refers to % corrected mortality,T refers to % death in treatment, andC refers to % death in vehicle control.


### 2.6. Antifeedant Activity

Both selective antifeedant activity and nonselective antifeedant activity were evaluated in our study. For the determination of selective antifeedant activity, the test compound-containing artificial diet and the control diet were simultaneously placed into each Petri dish with 3 cm distance. Twenty of the third instar larvae that already starved for 4 h were introduced into each Petri dish. The number of larvae within 1 cm range of the diet was counted within 2 to 72 h after the introduction of larvae. The selective antifeedant rate (%) is calculated as (C-T)/(C+T) ×100, whereC refers to the average larvae number of the control group andT refers to the average larvae number of the treated group. For the determination of nonselective antifeedant activity, one piece of the test compound-containing artificial diet or the control diet was placed into a Petri dish. Ten of the third instar larvae that already starved for 4 h were introduced into each Petri dish. After 48 h, the nonselective antifeedant rate (%) is calculated as (C-T)/C ×100, whereCrefers to the average diet weight of the control group before and after the bioassay andT refers to the average diet weight of the treated group before and after the bioassay.


### 2.7. Growth Inhibition

One piece of the test compound-containing artificial diet or the control diet was placed into a 5 cm diameter beaker. Ten of the third instar larvae were introduced into each beaker. After 48 h, the diet was replaced with normal diet. The larvae were continuously reared to become pupae. The average weight of pupae was then calculated.


### 2.8. Determination of Glutathione-S-Transferase (GST), Cytochrome P450 (CYP) CYP450, Acetylcholinesterase (AChE), and Carboxylesterase (CarE) Activities

The fifth instar larvae were exposed to the test compound-containing artificial diet or the control diet for 48 h. Midguts separated from larvae of each treatment were homogenized in liquid nitrogen and then added with 5 volumes of 0.1M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). Each sample was centrifugated at 8000g for 10 min at 4°C. Then, the activities of GST, AChE, CYP450, and CarE were further determined with the respective commercial kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Biotechnology, China) following the instructions provided by manufacturer.


### 2.9. Semiquantitative RT-PCR Detection of GSTs1, Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 4M14, and CYP4S9

The fifth instar larvae were exposed to the test compound-containing artificial diet or the control diet for 48 h. Total RNA was isolated from midguts ofS. litura larvae by using TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen) and liquid nitrogen. The RT-PCR was performed with PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit and Premix Taq (Takara Bio USA, Inc., USA) following the instructions provided by the manufacturer. The primer was designed according to the sequence of each gene in GeneBank and the specific primer sequences forGSTs1(HQ667936.1),CYP4M14 (DQ352137),CYP4S9 (DQ355383), andElongation factor-1α, (EF-1α) (U20129) were shown in Table 1[27, 28]. EF-1α was used as internal control. PCR amplification was set as follows: after an initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, 32 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55.9°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 60 s. The reaction ended with a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were resolved by gel electrophoresis in 1.2% agarose containing Tanon® Nucleic acid dye and visualized under UV light.Table 1
Primers used for semiquantitative RT-PCR.
Genes
Primer sequences
GSTs1 (HQ667936.1)
F 5′-AACATTGTCGTCATTGGACA-3′ R 5′-ACTTGCTGGTCTCAAAT TTC-3′
CYP4M14 (DQ352137)
F5′-GTTGCTCGCTAATCATAGGAAAAT-3′R 5′-GGTTCTTAAACAAATCTGGTCTCAA-3′
CYP4S9 (DQ355383)
F5′-CAACGATGTCTGATCTGGCT-3′R 5′-GCAGGTCGTATATGTGGATTGAT-3′
EF-1α (U20129)
F5′-ATGCCGAAATACGTATTCCACTAC-3′R 5′-TCCATATTCTAAGCAGGAACTGCA-3′
F: forward primer; R: reverse primer.


### 2.10. Statistical Analysis

The data in this study were reported as means ± SD for triplicate. The LC50 values were evaluated using Probit analysis. A t-test or one-way ANOVA was applied to evaluate for significant differences between two groups. Ap-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.


## 2.1. Chemicals

Z-LIG, levistilide A, senkyunolide A, senkyunolide I, and 3-butylidenephthalide were obtained from Chengdu Chroma-Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China), and stored at -80°C before use. Chlorpyrifos (O,O-diethyl O-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridyl phosphorothioate, CPF) was purchased from J&K Scientific Ltd. (Beijing, China).


## 2.2. Extraction of Essential Oil

The plant material ofL. chuanxiong was collected and separated as two parts, the rhizome and the stem and leaf. After weighing, the samples were extracted through the hydrodistillation process in a Clevenger Apparatus with continuous ice-cold water circulation in condenser. The volatile fraction was collected in dichloromethane and concentrated by a Buchi rotavapour system with water bath temperature no more than 25±1°C.


## 2.3. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS)

The Z-LIG level in in the essential oils was analyzed by GC-MS. The system consists of an Agilent 6890 type gas chromatograph and an Agilent 5975N mass spectrometer, which equips with an Agilent HP-5MS 5% Phenyl Methyl Siloxane (30 m × 0.25μm × 250 μm). The analytical conditions are shown as follows: oven and initial temperature = 60°C for 3 min, ramp at 8°C/min to 180°C, then ramp at 5°C/min to 240°C; injection temperature = 230°C; injection volume = 1 μL (1:1000 diluted in acetone); carrier gas = He; flow rate = 1.5 mL/min; solvent delay= 0 min; transfer temperature = 250°C; source temperature = 230°C; ionization, electron impact; ion energy = 70 eV; scan range, 30-500 Da. To quantify the content of Z-LIG, standard compound of Z-LIG with purity more than 98% was used in GC-MS analysis. Z-LIG was identified based on the retention time and mass spectral comparison with standard compound.


## 2.4. Insect Rearing

Eggs ofS. liturawere originally collected from field ofL. chuanxiong. Then, the rearing was carried out in our laboratory under constant conditions: 27 ± 1°C, RH 60-70%, and 12L:12D photoperiod. To maintain the generation of insects, female and male moths with the same number were caged in a 10 cm diameter beaker supplied with honey solution (10%) and permitted to copulate for 48 h. Eggs were then laid by female moths on wax paper. Upon egg hatching,S. litura larvae were fed on standard artificial diet [25].


## 2.5. Larvicidal Activity

Test compounds were dissolved in 200μL of DMSO and mixed thoroughly with 100g artificial diet. The artificial diet with DMSO only was used as control diet. The artificial diet with different doses of compounds or control diet was placed into Petri dishes (9 cm × 1.5 cm), respectively. The third instar larvae that already starved for 4 h were introduced into each Petri dish. After 72 h, the diet was replaced with normal diet. Another 6 days later, mortality of the larvae was checked, and larvae showed that the inability to move was scored as dead. A total of 20 larvae were used in each triplicate. Abbott’s formula [26] was applied to calculate the corrected mortality as follows:P=(T-C)/(100-C)×100, whereP refers to % corrected mortality,T refers to % death in treatment, andC refers to % death in vehicle control.


## 2.6. Antifeedant Activity

Both selective antifeedant activity and nonselective antifeedant activity were evaluated in our study. For the determination of selective antifeedant activity, the test compound-containing artificial diet and the control diet were simultaneously placed into each Petri dish with 3 cm distance. Twenty of the third instar larvae that already starved for 4 h were introduced into each Petri dish. The number of larvae within 1 cm range of the diet was counted within 2 to 72 h after the introduction of larvae. The selective antifeedant rate (%) is calculated as (C-T)/(C+T) ×100, whereC refers to the average larvae number of the control group andT refers to the average larvae number of the treated group. For the determination of nonselective antifeedant activity, one piece of the test compound-containing artificial diet or the control diet was placed into a Petri dish. Ten of the third instar larvae that already starved for 4 h were introduced into each Petri dish. After 48 h, the nonselective antifeedant rate (%) is calculated as (C-T)/C ×100, whereCrefers to the average diet weight of the control group before and after the bioassay andT refers to the average diet weight of the treated group before and after the bioassay.


## 2.7. Growth Inhibition

One piece of the test compound-containing artificial diet or the control diet was placed into a 5 cm diameter beaker. Ten of the third instar larvae were introduced into each beaker. After 48 h, the diet was replaced with normal diet. The larvae were continuously reared to become pupae. The average weight of pupae was then calculated.


## 2.8. Determination of Glutathione-S-Transferase (GST), Cytochrome P450 (CYP) CYP450, Acetylcholinesterase (AChE), and Carboxylesterase (CarE) Activities

The fifth instar larvae were exposed to the test compound-containing artificial diet or the control diet for 48 h. Midguts separated from larvae of each treatment were homogenized in liquid nitrogen and then added with 5 volumes of 0.1M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). Each sample was centrifugated at 8000g for 10 min at 4°C. Then, the activities of GST, AChE, CYP450, and CarE were further determined with the respective commercial kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Biotechnology, China) following the instructions provided by manufacturer.


## 2.9. Semiquantitative RT-PCR Detection of GSTs1, Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 4M14, and CYP4S9

The fifth instar larvae were exposed to the test compound-containing artificial diet or the control diet for 48 h. Total RNA was isolated from midguts ofS. litura larvae by using TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen) and liquid nitrogen. The RT-PCR was performed with PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit and Premix Taq (Takara Bio USA, Inc., USA) following the instructions provided by the manufacturer. The primer was designed according to the sequence of each gene in GeneBank and the specific primer sequences forGSTs1(HQ667936.1),CYP4M14 (DQ352137),CYP4S9 (DQ355383), andElongation factor-1α, (EF-1α) (U20129) were shown in Table 1[27, 28]. EF-1α was used as internal control. PCR amplification was set as follows: after an initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, 32 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55.9°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 60 s. The reaction ended with a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were resolved by gel electrophoresis in 1.2% agarose containing Tanon® Nucleic acid dye and visualized under UV light.Table 1
Primers used for semiquantitative RT-PCR.
Genes
Primer sequences
GSTs1 (HQ667936.1)
F 5′-AACATTGTCGTCATTGGACA-3′ R 5′-ACTTGCTGGTCTCAAAT TTC-3′
CYP4M14 (DQ352137)
F5′-GTTGCTCGCTAATCATAGGAAAAT-3′R 5′-GGTTCTTAAACAAATCTGGTCTCAA-3′
CYP4S9 (DQ355383)
F5′-CAACGATGTCTGATCTGGCT-3′R 5′-GCAGGTCGTATATGTGGATTGAT-3′
EF-1α (U20129)
F5′-ATGCCGAAATACGTATTCCACTAC-3′R 5′-TCCATATTCTAAGCAGGAACTGCA-3′
F: forward primer; R: reverse primer.


## 2.10. Statistical Analysis

The data in this study were reported as means ± SD for triplicate. The LC50 values were evaluated using Probit analysis. A t-test or one-way ANOVA was applied to evaluate for significant differences between two groups. Ap-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Influence of S. litura Larvae Feeding on the Accumulation of Z-LIG in L. chuanxiong

In field observation ofL. chuanxiong in the region of Pengzhou in Sichuan province,S. litura larvae were found to be one of the main pests (Figure 1(a)). To determine the incidence ofS. litura larvae, we evaluated the amount ofS. litura larvae inL. chuanxiong field during the different growth periods. As shown in Figure 1(b), noS. litura larvae were found during December to February. Only a fewS. litura larvae (5 per 100 plants in average) were observed in March. However, the amount ofS. litura larvae dramatically increased in part ofL. chuanxiong field during April (28 larvae per 100 plants in average) and May (51 larvae per 100 plants in average). Moreover,S. litura larvae were found in almost 62% ofL. chuanxiong field. Meanwhile, we also determined the accumulation of Z-LIG inL. chuanxiong by collectingL. chuanxiong from December to May and detecting the content of Z-LIG in the rhizome and the stem and leaf with GC-MS. As shown in Figure 1(c), the level of Z-LIG exhibited little change in rhizome from December to February. Obvious increase of Z-LIG in the rhizome was shown in March. A rapid accumulation of Z-LIG in the rhizome was observed in April and May, with 6.77-fold and 9.03-fold increase compared with that of December, respectively. The variation trend of Z-LIG content in the stem and leaf is very similar to that in the rhizome. However, the level of Z-LIG in the rhizome is marked higher than that in the stem and leaf, with 6.98-fold and 6.36-fold higher in April and May, respectively. Then, we determined the influence ofS. lituralarvae feeding on the content of Z-LIG in the pottedL. chuanxiong. As shown in Figure 1(d), the Z-LIG level in the stem and leaf of the pottedL. chuanxiong. withS. lituralarvae feeding (2 larvae per plants for 24 h) remarkably increased compared with that withoutS. lituralarvae feeding (p< 0.01), while the Z-LIG level in the rhizome of the pottedL. chuanxiong withS. lituralarvae feeding exhibited an increasing trend, but it is not statistically significant (p >0.05).Figure 1
S. lituralarvae feeding contributes to the accumulation of Z-LIG inL. chuanxiong. (a) Representative images showing the occurrence ofS. lituralarvae inL. chuanxiong in the region of Pengzhou in Sichuan province, China. (b) The incidence rate ofS. lituralarvae inL. chuanxiong field from December to May. (c) The accumulation of Z-LIG inL. chuanxiong during different growth periods. The Z-LIG content in the rhizome and the stem and leaf was analyzed by GC-MS. (d) Influence ofS. lituralarvae feeding on the content of Z-LIG in the stem and leaf and the rhizome of the pottedL. chuanxiong. After starvation for 4 h, Third instar larvae ofS. litura were released to feed on the pottedL. chuanxiong (2 larvae per plants). After 24 h, the plant materials were collected and the Z-LIG content in the rhizome and the stem and leaf was analyzed by GC-MS. Values are presented as means ± SD. (∗
∗)p<0.01. NS, nonsignificant.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


### 3.2. Larvicidal Activity, Antifeedant Activity, and Growth Inhibition of Z-LIG

To determine the larvicidal activity of Z-LIG onS. lituralarvae, we fedS. lituralarvae with food containing different doses of Z-LIG (0.1 to 5 mg·g−1). As shown in Figure 2(a), 0.1 and 0.25 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG showed almost no insecticidal activity compared with vehicle. Moreover, 0.5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG showed only weak larvicidal activity. However, Z-LIG (1 to 5 mg·g−1) exhibited prominent larvicidal activity. Then, we determined the antifeedant activity of Z-LIG onS. lituralarvae. The result of selective antifeedant activity in Figure 2(b) showed thatS. lituralarvae exhibited even higher selectivity to food with 0.1 mg·g−1 Z-LIG than that with vehicle. Very weak selective antifeedant activity was observed for 0.25 mg·g−1 and 0.5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG, whereas the selective antifeedant rate dramatically increased inS. lituralarvae exposed to 1 to 5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG. Moreover,S. lituralarvae exposed to 5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG exhibited 100% of selective antifeedant rate. Figure 2(c) showed that only weak nonselective antifeedant rate was shown inS. lituralarvae exposed to 0.1 to 0.5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG. However, marked selective antifeedant rate was observed inS. lituralarvae exposed to 1 to 5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG. To further examine the effect of Z-LIG on the growth ofS. lituralarvae, we compared the weight ofS. lituralarvae fed with and without Z-LIG. Figure 2(d) showed that 1 to 5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG remarkably inhibited the weight ofS. lituralarvae and 0.25 to 0.5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG only exhibited the weak or moderate inhibition, whereas 0.1 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG obviously promoted the growth ofS. lituralarvae.Figure 2
Defense effect of Z-LIG againstS. lituralarvae: (a) larvicidal activity; (b) nonselective antifeedant rate; (c) selective antifeedant rate; and (d) growth inhibition. Values are presented as means ± SD.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


### 3.3. Larvicidal Activity of Phthalides Existing in the Essential Oil of L. chuanxiong

The larvicidal activity of the five phthalides (Figure3) existing in the essential oil ofL. chuanxiongis shown in Table 2. Z-LIG showed the most larvicidal activity among these phthalides againstS. lituralarvae, with an LC50 value of 0.59 mg·g−1. Levistilide A and senkyunolide A showed the moderate larvicidal activity, with LC50 values of 0.67 and 0.98 mg·g−1, respectively. However, both 3-butylidenephthalide and senkyunolide I were less active and exhibited LC50 values of 1.56 and 2.39 mg·g−1, respectively.Table 2
LD50 values for larvicidal activity of phthalides against S. Lituralarvae.
Compound
L
D
50
a (mg·g−1)
95%CLb (mg·g−1)
slope±SE
R2
Z-LIG
0.59
0.51-0.69
1.03±0.28
0.9594
senkyunolide A
0.98
0.84-1.13
0.86±0.20
0.9649
senkyunolide I
2.39
2.04-2.80
0.91±0.23
0.9611
levistilide A
0.67
0.58-0.76
0.93±0.21
0.9688
3-butylidenephthalide
1.56
1.35-1.81
0.88±1.21
0.9657
aLC50 is the lethal concentration for 50% mortality; b95% confidence limit.Figure 3
Structure of main phthalides existing inL. chuanxiong.


### 3.4. Effect of Z-LIG on GST, CYP450, AChE, and CarE Activities

As shown in Figure4(a), there was a significant increase of GST activity inS. lituralarvae exposed to 0.1 (p < 0.01) and 0.5 (p < 0.05) mg·g−1 of Z-LIG compared with that exposed to vehicle, whereas GST activity dramatically decreased inS. lituralarvae exposed to 1 and 5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG (p < 0.001). Almost 21-fold decrease was observed inS. lituralarvae exposed to 5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG compared with that exposed to vehicle. In Figures 4(b) and 4(c), CYP450 and AChE activities also exhibited a similar trend that the activities of both enzymes remarkably increased for 0.1 and 0.5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG and significantly decreased for 1 and 5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG. For CarE activity, a marked increase was observed inS. lituralarvae exposed to 0.1 to 1 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG compared with that exposed to vehicle and the highest enzyme activity was shown for 0.5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG.Figure 4
Effect of Z-LIG on the activities of detoxification enzymes GST, AChE, CYP450, and CarE. Enzyme activities were determined as mentioned under Materials and Methods. Values are presented as means ± SD. (∗)p<0.05, (∗
∗)p<0.01, and (∗
∗
∗)p<0.001.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


### 3.5. Effect of Z-LIG on GSTs1, CYP4S9, and CYP4M14 Expression

To further determine the influence of Z-LIG on the expression of detoxification enzymes, we used RT-PCR to evaluate the mRNA level ofGSTs1,CYP4S9, andCYP4M14. Interestingly, the mRNA expression of all these three genes exhibited typic biphasic dose responses afterS. lituralarvae were exposed to Z-LIG (0.1 to 5 mg·g−1) or vehicle (Figure 5). The maximum expression for bothGSTs1andCYP4S9 was observed inS. lituralarvae exposed to 0.1 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG, while 0.5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG caused maximum expression ofCYP4M14.Figure 5
Effect of Z-LIG on the mRNA expression ofGSTS1,CYP4S9, andCYP4M14. mRNA expression was determined as mentioned under Materials and Methods.


### 3.6. Low Dose of Z-LIG Enhanced Resistance of S. litura Larvae against Pesticide CPF

To determine the possible influence of low dose of Z-LIG on the resistance ofS. lituralarvae, we pretreatedS. lituralarvae with 0.1 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG or vehicle for 48 h and then treatedS. lituralarvae with CPF (2.5 μg·g−1) or vehicle for another 3 days and the survival rate was determined. As shown in Figure 6, there was noS. lituralarvae death in the group pretreated and treated with vehicle. The same result was also observed in the group pretreated with Z-LIG and treated with vehicle. However, there was only 46.67% survival rate in the group of vehicle pretreatment and CPF treatment. Notably, the survival rate significantly increased to 60 % in the group of Z-LIG pretreatment and CPF treatment (p < 0.05). These results suggest that low dose of Z-LIG pretreatment may enhance the resistance ofS. lituralarvae against CPF.Figure 6
Low dose of Z-LIG confers resistance ofS. lituralarvae against CPF.S. lituralarvae were pretreated with 0.1 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG or vehicle for 48 h and then treated with CPF (2.5 μg·g−1) or vehicle for another 3 days and the survival rate was determined. Values are presented as means ± SD; (∗)p<0.05.


## 3.1. Influence of S. litura Larvae Feeding on the Accumulation of Z-LIG in L. chuanxiong

In field observation ofL. chuanxiong in the region of Pengzhou in Sichuan province,S. litura larvae were found to be one of the main pests (Figure 1(a)). To determine the incidence ofS. litura larvae, we evaluated the amount ofS. litura larvae inL. chuanxiong field during the different growth periods. As shown in Figure 1(b), noS. litura larvae were found during December to February. Only a fewS. litura larvae (5 per 100 plants in average) were observed in March. However, the amount ofS. litura larvae dramatically increased in part ofL. chuanxiong field during April (28 larvae per 100 plants in average) and May (51 larvae per 100 plants in average). Moreover,S. litura larvae were found in almost 62% ofL. chuanxiong field. Meanwhile, we also determined the accumulation of Z-LIG inL. chuanxiong by collectingL. chuanxiong from December to May and detecting the content of Z-LIG in the rhizome and the stem and leaf with GC-MS. As shown in Figure 1(c), the level of Z-LIG exhibited little change in rhizome from December to February. Obvious increase of Z-LIG in the rhizome was shown in March. A rapid accumulation of Z-LIG in the rhizome was observed in April and May, with 6.77-fold and 9.03-fold increase compared with that of December, respectively. The variation trend of Z-LIG content in the stem and leaf is very similar to that in the rhizome. However, the level of Z-LIG in the rhizome is marked higher than that in the stem and leaf, with 6.98-fold and 6.36-fold higher in April and May, respectively. Then, we determined the influence ofS. lituralarvae feeding on the content of Z-LIG in the pottedL. chuanxiong. As shown in Figure 1(d), the Z-LIG level in the stem and leaf of the pottedL. chuanxiong. withS. lituralarvae feeding (2 larvae per plants for 24 h) remarkably increased compared with that withoutS. lituralarvae feeding (p< 0.01), while the Z-LIG level in the rhizome of the pottedL. chuanxiong withS. lituralarvae feeding exhibited an increasing trend, but it is not statistically significant (p >0.05).Figure 1
S. lituralarvae feeding contributes to the accumulation of Z-LIG inL. chuanxiong. (a) Representative images showing the occurrence ofS. lituralarvae inL. chuanxiong in the region of Pengzhou in Sichuan province, China. (b) The incidence rate ofS. lituralarvae inL. chuanxiong field from December to May. (c) The accumulation of Z-LIG inL. chuanxiong during different growth periods. The Z-LIG content in the rhizome and the stem and leaf was analyzed by GC-MS. (d) Influence ofS. lituralarvae feeding on the content of Z-LIG in the stem and leaf and the rhizome of the pottedL. chuanxiong. After starvation for 4 h, Third instar larvae ofS. litura were released to feed on the pottedL. chuanxiong (2 larvae per plants). After 24 h, the plant materials were collected and the Z-LIG content in the rhizome and the stem and leaf was analyzed by GC-MS. Values are presented as means ± SD. (∗
∗)p<0.01. NS, nonsignificant.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.2. Larvicidal Activity, Antifeedant Activity, and Growth Inhibition of Z-LIG

To determine the larvicidal activity of Z-LIG onS. lituralarvae, we fedS. lituralarvae with food containing different doses of Z-LIG (0.1 to 5 mg·g−1). As shown in Figure 2(a), 0.1 and 0.25 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG showed almost no insecticidal activity compared with vehicle. Moreover, 0.5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG showed only weak larvicidal activity. However, Z-LIG (1 to 5 mg·g−1) exhibited prominent larvicidal activity. Then, we determined the antifeedant activity of Z-LIG onS. lituralarvae. The result of selective antifeedant activity in Figure 2(b) showed thatS. lituralarvae exhibited even higher selectivity to food with 0.1 mg·g−1 Z-LIG than that with vehicle. Very weak selective antifeedant activity was observed for 0.25 mg·g−1 and 0.5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG, whereas the selective antifeedant rate dramatically increased inS. lituralarvae exposed to 1 to 5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG. Moreover,S. lituralarvae exposed to 5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG exhibited 100% of selective antifeedant rate. Figure 2(c) showed that only weak nonselective antifeedant rate was shown inS. lituralarvae exposed to 0.1 to 0.5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG. However, marked selective antifeedant rate was observed inS. lituralarvae exposed to 1 to 5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG. To further examine the effect of Z-LIG on the growth ofS. lituralarvae, we compared the weight ofS. lituralarvae fed with and without Z-LIG. Figure 2(d) showed that 1 to 5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG remarkably inhibited the weight ofS. lituralarvae and 0.25 to 0.5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG only exhibited the weak or moderate inhibition, whereas 0.1 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG obviously promoted the growth ofS. lituralarvae.Figure 2
Defense effect of Z-LIG againstS. lituralarvae: (a) larvicidal activity; (b) nonselective antifeedant rate; (c) selective antifeedant rate; and (d) growth inhibition. Values are presented as means ± SD.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.3. Larvicidal Activity of Phthalides Existing in the Essential Oil of L. chuanxiong

The larvicidal activity of the five phthalides (Figure3) existing in the essential oil ofL. chuanxiongis shown in Table 2. Z-LIG showed the most larvicidal activity among these phthalides againstS. lituralarvae, with an LC50 value of 0.59 mg·g−1. Levistilide A and senkyunolide A showed the moderate larvicidal activity, with LC50 values of 0.67 and 0.98 mg·g−1, respectively. However, both 3-butylidenephthalide and senkyunolide I were less active and exhibited LC50 values of 1.56 and 2.39 mg·g−1, respectively.Table 2
LD50 values for larvicidal activity of phthalides against S. Lituralarvae.
Compound
L
D
50
a (mg·g−1)
95%CLb (mg·g−1)
slope±SE
R2
Z-LIG
0.59
0.51-0.69
1.03±0.28
0.9594
senkyunolide A
0.98
0.84-1.13
0.86±0.20
0.9649
senkyunolide I
2.39
2.04-2.80
0.91±0.23
0.9611
levistilide A
0.67
0.58-0.76
0.93±0.21
0.9688
3-butylidenephthalide
1.56
1.35-1.81
0.88±1.21
0.9657
aLC50 is the lethal concentration for 50% mortality; b95% confidence limit.Figure 3
Structure of main phthalides existing inL. chuanxiong.


## 3.4. Effect of Z-LIG on GST, CYP450, AChE, and CarE Activities

As shown in Figure4(a), there was a significant increase of GST activity inS. lituralarvae exposed to 0.1 (p < 0.01) and 0.5 (p < 0.05) mg·g−1 of Z-LIG compared with that exposed to vehicle, whereas GST activity dramatically decreased inS. lituralarvae exposed to 1 and 5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG (p < 0.001). Almost 21-fold decrease was observed inS. lituralarvae exposed to 5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG compared with that exposed to vehicle. In Figures 4(b) and 4(c), CYP450 and AChE activities also exhibited a similar trend that the activities of both enzymes remarkably increased for 0.1 and 0.5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG and significantly decreased for 1 and 5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG. For CarE activity, a marked increase was observed inS. lituralarvae exposed to 0.1 to 1 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG compared with that exposed to vehicle and the highest enzyme activity was shown for 0.5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG.Figure 4
Effect of Z-LIG on the activities of detoxification enzymes GST, AChE, CYP450, and CarE. Enzyme activities were determined as mentioned under Materials and Methods. Values are presented as means ± SD. (∗)p<0.05, (∗
∗)p<0.01, and (∗
∗
∗)p<0.001.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.5. Effect of Z-LIG on GSTs1, CYP4S9, and CYP4M14 Expression

To further determine the influence of Z-LIG on the expression of detoxification enzymes, we used RT-PCR to evaluate the mRNA level ofGSTs1,CYP4S9, andCYP4M14. Interestingly, the mRNA expression of all these three genes exhibited typic biphasic dose responses afterS. lituralarvae were exposed to Z-LIG (0.1 to 5 mg·g−1) or vehicle (Figure 5). The maximum expression for bothGSTs1andCYP4S9 was observed inS. lituralarvae exposed to 0.1 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG, while 0.5 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG caused maximum expression ofCYP4M14.Figure 5
Effect of Z-LIG on the mRNA expression ofGSTS1,CYP4S9, andCYP4M14. mRNA expression was determined as mentioned under Materials and Methods.


## 3.6. Low Dose of Z-LIG Enhanced Resistance of S. litura Larvae against Pesticide CPF

To determine the possible influence of low dose of Z-LIG on the resistance ofS. lituralarvae, we pretreatedS. lituralarvae with 0.1 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG or vehicle for 48 h and then treatedS. lituralarvae with CPF (2.5 μg·g−1) or vehicle for another 3 days and the survival rate was determined. As shown in Figure 6, there was noS. lituralarvae death in the group pretreated and treated with vehicle. The same result was also observed in the group pretreated with Z-LIG and treated with vehicle. However, there was only 46.67% survival rate in the group of vehicle pretreatment and CPF treatment. Notably, the survival rate significantly increased to 60 % in the group of Z-LIG pretreatment and CPF treatment (p < 0.05). These results suggest that low dose of Z-LIG pretreatment may enhance the resistance ofS. lituralarvae against CPF.Figure 6
Low dose of Z-LIG confers resistance ofS. lituralarvae against CPF.S. lituralarvae were pretreated with 0.1 mg·g−1 of Z-LIG or vehicle for 48 h and then treated with CPF (2.5 μg·g−1) or vehicle for another 3 days and the survival rate was determined. Values are presented as means ± SD; (∗)p<0.05.


## 4. Discussion

In an ecological environment, plants have evolved sophisticated defense systems to sense and resist a variety of biotic threats. Invertebrates, particularly insects, are the major biotic factor that interacts with plants in the microenvironment as insects have evolved to feed on plants at least 4 billion years ago, which leads to the formation of a close coevolutionary relationship [29]. The main approach employed by plants to avoid the attack from herbivorous insects is the chemical defense, which is partially mediated by the production of toxic and repellent compounds that accumulate after insect feeding [30, 31]. Recently, we directed our effort to screen hormetic phytochemicals from essential oils extracted from traditional Chinese herbal medicine. As a result, a group of phthalide compounds isolated from the essential oil ofRhizoma Chuanxiong drew our special attention. Among them, Z-LIG exhibited potent neuroprotective effect against ischemic injury via the activation of cellular stress response mechanism Nrf2 and HSP70 pathways [14–16]. Meanwhile, the role that Z-LIG plays inL. chuanxiong is also very interesting to us.Rhizoma Chuanxiongcollected from the regions of Dujiangyan and Pengzhou in Sichuan province is of high quality and large quantities and supplies nationwide and abroad [9]. It has been found thatS. lituralarvae are one of the major pests that feed onL. chuanxiong distributed in Dujiangyan and Pengzhou [32]. Thus, the current study aimed to figure out whether Z-LIG plays a defense role inL. chuanxiong againstS. lituralarvae.In the field ofL. chuanxiong in Pengzhou of Sichuan province, we found thatS. lituralarvae were indeed one of the main pests ofL. chuanxiong. Thus, we first determined the incidence ofS. litura larvae inL. chuanxiong and the accumulation of Z-LIG in the rhizome and the stem and leaf during the different periods of growth. Interestingly, we observed that there was a quite similar increasing trend for Z-LIG content andS. litura larvae amount, both of which showed a rapid growth during March to May. Then, we asked whether feeding byS. lituralarvae influences the accumulation of Z-LIG inL. chuanxiong. Interestingly, our results showed thatS. litura larvae feeding led to the increase of Z-LIG in the stem and leaf of the pottedL. chuanxiong, suggesting that Z-LIG accumulation inL. chuanxiong may be at least in part correlated with the outbreak ofS. lituralarvae. Similarly, accumulating evidence have demonstrated that phytochemicals are adaptively induced and accumulate in plants in response to attack by insects. For example, the induced accumulation of isoflavone 7-O-glucosides and isoflavone 7-O-(6′′-O-malonyl-β-glucosides) was observed after soybean (Var. Enrei) leaves were treated with a combination of plant defense elicitors present inS. litura gut content extracts [33]. Two isoflavone aglycones (daidzein and formononetin) and their conjugates (glucosides and malonyl glucosides) were found to increase in soybean leaves [Glycine max (L.) Merr. (Fabaceae)] following attack by common cutworm larvae [34]. The highly toxic isothiocyanates were produced by the myrosinase mediated hydrolysis of glucosinolates in cruciferous plants upon the damage of herbivores [35]. We then evaluated whether Z-LIG showed a defense effect againstS. lituralarvae by determining larvicidal activity, antifeedant activity, and growth inhibition. Our results showed that Z-LIG ranging from 0.1 to 0.5 mg·g−1 showed no or weak larvicidal activity, antifeedant activity, and growth inhibitory activity againstS. lituralarvae, whereas higher dose (1 to 5 mg·g−1) of Z-LIG exhibited remarkable larvicidal activity, antifeedant activity, and growth inhibitory activity. Previous studies demonstrated that Z-LIG also exhibited strong insecticidal activity against other insects. For example, Z-LIG was shown to be the most potent toxicity among the alkylphthalides isolated from the chloroform extract ofCnidium officinale rhizomes against the larvae and adults of Drosophila melanogaster [17, 18] and the Q-biotype females ofBemisia tabaci[20]. Besides Z-LIG, we also determined the larvicidal activity of other structure-similar phthalides existing in the essential oil ofL. chuanxiong. Based on LC50 values, the potency of the larvicidal activity of these phthalides againstS. lituralarvae can be summarized as follows: Z-Ligustilide > levistilide A > senkyunolide A > 3-butylidenephthalide > senkyunolide I. The structure-activity relationship can be further drawn based on the results. Z-LIG bears a typical α, β, γ, δ-unsaturated lactone. Moreover, the carbonyl group at its C-2 position is an electron-withdrawing group, which can withdraw electron from the α, β, γ, δ-unsaturated double bonds. Thus, the unsaturated double bond between C-3 and C-8 in Z-LIG is highly active. Levistilide A is polymerized by two molecular Z-LIG and only one complete chain of α, β, γ, δ-unsaturated double bonds is preserved. Senkyunolide A lacks γ, δ-unsaturated double bond compared with Z-LIG. The aromatic ring of 3-butylidenephthalide is a strong electron donating group, which greatly reduces the reactive ability of the γ, δ-unsaturated double bonds. The hydroxyl group at the C-7 position of senkyunolide I can form a conjugated effect with α, β, γ, δ-two double bonds. Under this effect, hydroxyl group is an electron donating group, which also reduces the reactive ability of the γ, δ-unsaturated double bonds. Thus, our results indicate the presence of conjugation of α, β, γ, δ-unsaturated double bonds with carbonyl group rather than aromaticity or hydroxyl group seems to play a critical role for the larvicidal activity of phthalides againstS. lituralarvae. Consistent with our results, Chae et al. [20] reported that the conjugation is highly correlated with the toxicity of three phthalides identified inRhizome Cnidium officinale (JapaneseChuanxiong) to the Q-biotype females. However, it has also been shown that the conjugation and aromaticity seem to play an important role in the larvicidal and adulticidal activity of phthalides againstDrosophila melanogaster[17, 18].Notably, the effect of Z-LIG on the enzyme activities of GST, CYP450, AChE, and CarE inS. lituralarvae showed a biphasic dose response with an increase in low dose of Z-LIG and decrease in high dose of Z-LIG, which is supported by Z-LIG-mediated change ofGSTS1mRNA expression, which also exhibited a biphasic dose response. Similar trend was further observed in the mRNA expression ofCYP4S9 andCYP4M14inS. lituralarvae after Z-LIG treatment. These results indicate the possibility that detoxification enzymes can be adaptively induced inS. lituralarvae as a prosurvival mechanism in response to low dose of Z-LIG, whereas they were directly inhibited under the insult of high dose of Z-LIG, which further confirms the hormetic role of Z-LIG. Our previous studies showed that low dose of Z-LIG induced transcription factor Nrf2-mediated detoxification enzymes and HSP70 pathways, which resulted in the tolerance against ischemic injury [14–16]. We are then curious about whether low dose of Z-LIG enhances the resistance ofS. lituralarvae as we already showed that low dose of Z-LIG induced the expression and/or activity of detoxification enzymes in Figures 4 and 5. Interestingly, our results clearly demonstrated that the resistance ofS. lituralarvae against pesticide CPF was remarkably enhanced by the pretreatment of low dose (0.1 mg·g−1) of Z-LIG. This result obtained from the level of plant and insect interaction may provide an explanation for our recent study, in which subtoxic dose of Z-LIG activated the cellular stress response mechanisms, such as Nrf2 and HSP70 mediated pathways, in rats, and enhanced the tolerance of the rats against ischemic injury [14–16].Under field conditions,S. lituralarvae feed mainly on leaf and occasionally on stem ofL. chuanxiong. In our study, we found that Z-LIG level in the stem and leaf ofL. chuanxiong was 0.42 ± 0.10 mg·g−1 in April and 0.55 ± 0.11 mg·g−1 in May. Under our experimental conditions, Z-LIG ranging from 0.1 to 0.5 mg·g−1 showed weak larvicidal activity, antifeedant activity, and growth inhibitory activity againstS. lituralarvae. Meanwhile, the detoxification enzymes in the midgut ofS. lituralarvae were also adaptively triggered by Z-LIG ranging from 0.1 to 0.5 mg·g−1. Thus, it can be reasonably speculated that Z-LIG produced in the stem and leaf ofL. chuanxiong may play a weak chemical defense role againstS. lituralarvae, whileS. lituralarvae also utilize detoxification enzymes as prosurvival mechanism against the toxicity of Z-LIG, which implicating an interaction betweenL. chuanxiong andS. lituralarvae.


## 5. Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that high dose of Z-LIG exhibited remarkable larvicidal activity, antifeedant activity, and growth inhibition againstS. lituralarvae and dramatically inhibited the activity and/or expression of detoxification enzymes inS. lituralarvae. However, low dose of Z-LIG relevant to the level of Z-LIG inL. chuanxiong showed a weak defense effect onS. lituralarvae, which was accompanied by the adaptive induction of detoxification enzymes inS. lituralarvae. These results suggest that Z-LIG may function as a hormetic phytochemical in the chemical defense ofL. chuanxiong againstS. lituralarvae, which may facilitate our understanding of health benefits of Z-LIG at subtoxic dose in humans from ecological and evolutionary perspective.



---

*Source: 7104513-2018-07-02.xml*