# Stealth Effect of Red Shell inLaqueus rubellus (Brachiopoda, Terebratulida) on the Sea Bottom: An Evolutionary Insight into the Prey-Predator Interaction

Authors: Yuta Shiino; Kota Kitazawa
Journal: ISRN Zoology
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

The selective advantage of empire red coloration in the shell ofLaqueus rubellus (a terebratulid brachiopod) was examined in terms of prey-predator interactions. The study was based on a comparison of benthic suspension feeders living at a depth of about 130 m in Suruga Bay, Japan, with special reference to their visibility under visible and near-infrared light conditions. Almost all species exhibited red coloration under visible light, while only the shell of Laqueus was dark under infrared light, similar to rocks and bioclasts. Given the functional eyes of macropredators such as fishes and coleoids, which are specialized to detect light in the blue-to-green visible spectrum, and even the long-wavelength photoreceptors of malacosteids, Laqueus should avoid both visible and infrared detection by predators inhabiting the sublittoral bottom zone. This fact suggests that terebratulids have evolved the ability to remain essentially invisible even as the optic detection abilities of predators have improved. The present hypothesis leads to the possibility that the appearance of marine organisms is associated with the passive defensive strategy, making possible to provide a lower predation risk.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Most organisms in natural settings live within a competitive framework, and this reciprocal interaction has been the driving force in evolutionary arms races [1]. Predator-prey interactions are an interesting subject for research on evolutionary arms races because the corresponding adaptations of prey and predator demonstrate how organisms survive to enhance and/or modify their behavioural and functional performances within a biotic community [2]. If either the predator or the prey cannot adapt to relevant changes in the other, extinction may occur.Benthic suspension feeders, such as bivalves, brachiopods, and some echinoderms, have been exposed to predation for macropredators throughout the Phanerozoic. They have developed several strategies toward off-potential predators. For example, some bivalves exhibit thickened valves that physically protect them against predator attacks [3–5], while others exhibit enhanced burrowing or swimming ability [6–8]. Crinoids and ophiuroids have evolved the ability to autotomise and regenerate tentacles that are bitten off by predators [9–11]. In contrast, rhynchonelliformean brachiopods are immobile sessile organisms with comparatively thin shells [12, 13] that appear to have evolved neither physical, physiological, nor behavioural defences against predators.Among rhynchonelliformean brachiopods, terebratulids are known to be the most successful group, having persisted from the Devonian to the modern era. They have semi-circular rounded valves and a pedicle for attachment to a hard substratum. In contrast to the simple appearance of other rhynchonelliformean brachiopods, the shells of many living terebratulids exhibit distinctive colouration, including pink, orange, red- and red-brown pigments. It has been taken for granted that the characteristic shell colours of living terebratulids may exhibit some predator deterrent effect [14, 15], but antipredator function of colours has not been explained.In culture experiments in our laboratory [16], we have observed that the terebratulid brachiopod Laqueus rubellus, which is empire red in colour, is difficult to see using a video scope under near-infrared illumination. Based on subsequent observations using visible and infrared light, we describe the optical properties of the shell of this species and its ecological significance in order to explain why terebratulid brachiopods thrive on the sublittoral sea bottom.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Sampling Location

Benthic organisms includingLaqueus rubellus were collected using a dredge (90 cm in width) at a depth of 130–140 m off Osezaki in Suruga Bay (Figure 1). Our sampling site was located on the outermost shelf bottom and featured mud and fine-grained sand with abundant debris, such as rounded gravel and bioclasts. The environmental conditions (e.g., water temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, chlorophyll a, and nutrient concentrations) at the bottom of inner Suruga Bay are stable over a wide area, but Laqueus rubellus flourishes only around the sublittoral shelf edge [16, 17].Figure 1
Map of the sampling region.


### 2.2. Materials

Figure2 shows the number of living benthic macroorganisms in the recovered dredge sample. Among the suspension feeders, Laqueus rubellus, the stalked crinoid Metacrinus rotundus, and ophiuroids are the dominant species. In contrast to the free-living Metacrinusand ophiuroids, all living Laqueus were attached to bioclasts or rock debris using their attachment organ, the pedicle. Two species of bivalves, Cryptopecten vesiculosus and Nemocardium samarangae, and scleractinian corals occurred only in low numbers in our samples.Figure 2
Species counts in the benthic faunal community off Osezaki, Suruga Bay. Note thatLaqueus, Metacrinus, and ophiuroids dominate, while bivalves are rare.


### 2.3. Observation Methods

In order to examine the differences in visibility among the recovered benthic organisms, they were photographed under visible and infrared light while resting in a white tray of seawater. Under visible light conditions, we used a digital camera (D70, Nikon) and an incandescent lighting system (PRF-500WB, National). To visualise infrared illumination, the organisms were filmed with a video scope under near-infrared light of around 800 nm wavelength (DCR-TRV20, SONY), and the infrared images were captured as video frames. The results from these two methods are referred to as the natural and infrared visibilities, respectively.


### 2.4. Quantitative Analysis of Greyscale Images

For the quantitative examination of visibility for infrared images, we obtained the histogram of greyscale colour using image analysing software called ImageJ. The image of each animal was taken with 1 metre distant from the video scope. Animal outlines in greyscale images were drawn by the tool of polygon selections in ImageJ, and then area inside the outline was analysed to obtain 256 shades of greyscale histogram.


## 2.1. Sampling Location

Benthic organisms includingLaqueus rubellus were collected using a dredge (90 cm in width) at a depth of 130–140 m off Osezaki in Suruga Bay (Figure 1). Our sampling site was located on the outermost shelf bottom and featured mud and fine-grained sand with abundant debris, such as rounded gravel and bioclasts. The environmental conditions (e.g., water temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, chlorophyll a, and nutrient concentrations) at the bottom of inner Suruga Bay are stable over a wide area, but Laqueus rubellus flourishes only around the sublittoral shelf edge [16, 17].Figure 1
Map of the sampling region.


## 2.2. Materials

Figure2 shows the number of living benthic macroorganisms in the recovered dredge sample. Among the suspension feeders, Laqueus rubellus, the stalked crinoid Metacrinus rotundus, and ophiuroids are the dominant species. In contrast to the free-living Metacrinusand ophiuroids, all living Laqueus were attached to bioclasts or rock debris using their attachment organ, the pedicle. Two species of bivalves, Cryptopecten vesiculosus and Nemocardium samarangae, and scleractinian corals occurred only in low numbers in our samples.Figure 2
Species counts in the benthic faunal community off Osezaki, Suruga Bay. Note thatLaqueus, Metacrinus, and ophiuroids dominate, while bivalves are rare.


## 2.3. Observation Methods

In order to examine the differences in visibility among the recovered benthic organisms, they were photographed under visible and infrared light while resting in a white tray of seawater. Under visible light conditions, we used a digital camera (D70, Nikon) and an incandescent lighting system (PRF-500WB, National). To visualise infrared illumination, the organisms were filmed with a video scope under near-infrared light of around 800 nm wavelength (DCR-TRV20, SONY), and the infrared images were captured as video frames. The results from these two methods are referred to as the natural and infrared visibilities, respectively.


## 2.4. Quantitative Analysis of Greyscale Images

For the quantitative examination of visibility for infrared images, we obtained the histogram of greyscale colour using image analysing software called ImageJ. The image of each animal was taken with 1 metre distant from the video scope. Animal outlines in greyscale images were drawn by the tool of polygon selections in ImageJ, and then area inside the outline was analysed to obtain 256 shades of greyscale histogram.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Natural Visibility (under Visible Light)

Figures3(a), 3(b), and 3(e) show photographs under visible light conditions. All organisms observed are red coloured (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)) except the crinoid Metacrinus rotundus(Figure 3(e)), which is white to ivory in colour. Laqueus rubellus has a thin shell that is coloured orange to empire red and is transparent enough to see the organism inside (Figures 3(a) and 3(b): rb). Larger shells tend to be darker in colour. The shells of Cryptopecten vesiculosus and Nemocardium samarangaeare ornamented with mosaics of red and white colours. The patterns of colouration exhibit interspecific variation (Figure 3(a): pe, Figure 3(b): pe and ne). The shell of Cryptopectenis coloured by wine red pigment in a patchy fashion, while that of Nemocardium is ornamented with several radial orange bands. The scleractinian coral has reddish soft parts within a white skeleton (Figure 3(a): sc). The upper sides of all ophiuroids show red to reddish-brown colours, while the lower sides of their bodies are whitish (Figures 3(a) and 3(b): op).Photographs of benthic macroorganisms under visible ((a), (b), (e)) and infrared ((c), (d), (f)) light. Note that all organisms have a reddish appearance under natural light ((a), (b)) except the crinoid (e), while the organisms differ in brightness under infrared light, withLaqueus having the darkest appearance. rb: Laqueus rubellus, op: ophiuroids, sc: scleractinian coral, pe: Cryptopecten vesiculosus, ne: Nemocardium samarangae, me: Metacrinus rotundus.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


### 3.2. Infrared Visibility (under Near-Infrared Light)

Figures3(c), 3(d), and 3(f) show photographs under infrared visibility, which are compared with Figures 3(a), 3(b), and 3(e), respectively. Unlike natural visibility, infrared images displayed a difference in colour intensity among taxa. As was apparent from the infrared images, the shells of Laqueus rubellus were the darkest and were similar in colouration to the attached bioclasts and rock fragments (Figures 3(c) and 3(d)). The shell darkness tended to increase with shell length. Meanwhile, ophiuroids and the crinoid Metacrinus were the brightest, contrasting sharply with the colouration of Laqueus(Figure 3(c): black arrowhead). Molluscan shells were grey in colour but somewhat faint compared to Laqueus. Sediment particles that were trapped in pectinid ribs were dark grey, as were bioclasts and rock fragments (Figures 3(c) and 3(d): white arrowhead).


### 3.3. Greyscale Image Analysis

Figure4 shows 256 shades of greyscale histogram for selected individuals. Counts of each greyscale plot among the individuals are significantly different (P<0.001, pairwise ANOVA). Mean values in the case of Laqueus were around 40 that was the lowest (darkest) among the animals. Bivalves, ophiuroids, and scleractinian coral exhibit similar mean values, the range of which were around 51–62, 52–77, and 58, respectively, but those of bivalves were slightly lower than those of the other two. The histograms in the case of two crinoid Metacrinus show gentle convex shape with the peak around 90 in Metacrinus 1 and around 160 in Metacrinus 2.Histogram of 256 grey shades for benthic animals presented herein.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)(k)(l)All of the histogram supports qualitative results of infrared visibility as mentioned above. However, the shape of histogram and its peak considerably differs between the cases ofMetacrinus 1 and 2, which seem to be artifact but not biological indication. Further improvement of photology will be needed to understand the animal optic property.


## 3.1. Natural Visibility (under Visible Light)

Figures3(a), 3(b), and 3(e) show photographs under visible light conditions. All organisms observed are red coloured (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)) except the crinoid Metacrinus rotundus(Figure 3(e)), which is white to ivory in colour. Laqueus rubellus has a thin shell that is coloured orange to empire red and is transparent enough to see the organism inside (Figures 3(a) and 3(b): rb). Larger shells tend to be darker in colour. The shells of Cryptopecten vesiculosus and Nemocardium samarangaeare ornamented with mosaics of red and white colours. The patterns of colouration exhibit interspecific variation (Figure 3(a): pe, Figure 3(b): pe and ne). The shell of Cryptopectenis coloured by wine red pigment in a patchy fashion, while that of Nemocardium is ornamented with several radial orange bands. The scleractinian coral has reddish soft parts within a white skeleton (Figure 3(a): sc). The upper sides of all ophiuroids show red to reddish-brown colours, while the lower sides of their bodies are whitish (Figures 3(a) and 3(b): op).Photographs of benthic macroorganisms under visible ((a), (b), (e)) and infrared ((c), (d), (f)) light. Note that all organisms have a reddish appearance under natural light ((a), (b)) except the crinoid (e), while the organisms differ in brightness under infrared light, withLaqueus having the darkest appearance. rb: Laqueus rubellus, op: ophiuroids, sc: scleractinian coral, pe: Cryptopecten vesiculosus, ne: Nemocardium samarangae, me: Metacrinus rotundus.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


## 3.2. Infrared Visibility (under Near-Infrared Light)

Figures3(c), 3(d), and 3(f) show photographs under infrared visibility, which are compared with Figures 3(a), 3(b), and 3(e), respectively. Unlike natural visibility, infrared images displayed a difference in colour intensity among taxa. As was apparent from the infrared images, the shells of Laqueus rubellus were the darkest and were similar in colouration to the attached bioclasts and rock fragments (Figures 3(c) and 3(d)). The shell darkness tended to increase with shell length. Meanwhile, ophiuroids and the crinoid Metacrinus were the brightest, contrasting sharply with the colouration of Laqueus(Figure 3(c): black arrowhead). Molluscan shells were grey in colour but somewhat faint compared to Laqueus. Sediment particles that were trapped in pectinid ribs were dark grey, as were bioclasts and rock fragments (Figures 3(c) and 3(d): white arrowhead).


## 3.3. Greyscale Image Analysis

Figure4 shows 256 shades of greyscale histogram for selected individuals. Counts of each greyscale plot among the individuals are significantly different (P<0.001, pairwise ANOVA). Mean values in the case of Laqueus were around 40 that was the lowest (darkest) among the animals. Bivalves, ophiuroids, and scleractinian coral exhibit similar mean values, the range of which were around 51–62, 52–77, and 58, respectively, but those of bivalves were slightly lower than those of the other two. The histograms in the case of two crinoid Metacrinus show gentle convex shape with the peak around 90 in Metacrinus 1 and around 160 in Metacrinus 2.Histogram of 256 grey shades for benthic animals presented herein.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)(k)(l)All of the histogram supports qualitative results of infrared visibility as mentioned above. However, the shape of histogram and its peak considerably differs between the cases ofMetacrinus 1 and 2, which seem to be artifact but not biological indication. Further improvement of photology will be needed to understand the animal optic property.


## 4. Discussion

### 4.1. Optical Evasion from Macropredators

Remaining undetected by predators is an efficient strategy to decrease the mortality rate of sessile benthic organisms. The reddish colouration of the benthic organisms studied here may help them avoid detection by macropredators. This can be explained by the optical properties of visible light.The reddish appearance of an object means that the red portion of the visible spectrum is reflected by its surface, while other wavelengths of visible light are absorbed. Red light has the longest wavelengths in the visible spectrum, and its energy is lower [18]. Such low-energy light is preferentially diffused under water, resulting in a loss of the red optical element at the bottom of the sublittoral zone [18, 19]. Benthic organisms that appear reddish under visible light conditions, therefore, would appear black in colour at the sublittoral bottom. Laqueus rubellus and other associated organisms on the outer shelf of Suruga Bay should appear dark in colour in their natural habitat, making it possible for them to go unrecognised by the eyes of macropredators such as fish and squid [20–24].Unlike the natural visibility of benthic organisms, their contrasting infrared visibility suggests the possibility of another survival strategy against predators. Almost all deep-sea fishes have eyes that are sensitive to light in the blue-to-green visible spectrum because these wavelengths can penetrate deeply into the ocean [24]. Malacosteids, however, have retinal pigments that are particularly sensitive to red light, and these fishes have been compared to snipers armed with infrared “snooperscopes” at night [25, 26]. One such predator, the malacosteid Photostomias guernei, has been reported in the seas around Japan, as well as in Suruga Bay [27, 28]. However, it is unlikely that Laqueus is affected by the long-wavelength sensitivity of deep-sea fishes, as it shows the similarly dark appearance of rocks and skeletal fragments. Laqueus shells under infrared light suggest that Laqueus has evolved a “Ninja” survival strategy in which its shell behaves optically like a nonliving object on the sublittoral bottom.


### 4.2. One Likely Possibility for the Evolutionary Arms Race between Sessile Benthic Organisms and Macropredators

The camouflage strategy ofLaqueus rubellus to the detection abilities of macropredators suggests that our results are not merely a coincidence but instead signal an intimate and evolutionary interplay or arms race. This leads to several evolutionary scenarios, as discussed below.Laqueusand the vision systems of its predators may have experienced selective pressure for optical evasion and detection ability of the photoreceptor, respectively. Each enhancement of one exerts selection for a compensating enhancement of the other. This is a form of coevolution [1, 29]. In addition to this predator-prey interaction, brachiopod survival on the sea bottom is also affected by competition among benthic organisms, which belong to a similar guild [30–32]. As a consequence, several species of the benthic community are involved, and their abundances are not independent. This corresponds to the concept of “diffuse (or guild) coevolution” [1].In the modern sea, highly efficient vision systems are evident in teleost fishes and coleoid cephalopods, both of which originated in the early Mesozoic and drastically diversified during the Jurassic [33–35]. Spiriferinids, which were one of the most thrived brachiopod groups and showed no indications of colour [36], became extinct soon after the diversification of the macropredators even though they possessed certain morphologies that are considered to be exquisite adaptations for feeding system [37–41]. On the other hand, terebratulids did not become extinct but began to diversify and persisted to the modern era [42]. Considering the improvement over time in the predation abilities of macropredators [43], our results suggest that the red colouration and infrared opacity of terebratulids is an effective adaptation to life at the sublittoral bottom, even though these organisms are immobile and seemingly defenceless.The relationship between the colouration and the apparent evolutionary trend motivated us to consider the aetiology of visibility and its evolution. Through biochemical analysis of intracrystalline proteins in the terebratulid shell, Cusack et al. [14] identified N-terminal amino acid sequence of 6.5 kDa protein that may function to embed a red carotenoprotein in the shell. Because Laqueus shells examined here tend to exhibit more vivid red colouration in larger individuals, the red pigment is probably deposited gradually during the growth of the secondary shell layer. Because the 6.5 kDa protein has been extracted from different shell layers in each species, it seems to represent a phylogenetic constraint [44].Enigmatic problems remain in this hypothesis, namely, the origin of infrared opacity and its evolution. Further studies will be needed to elucidate how terebratulids in the marine benthic community have evolved in response to increasing predation pressures.


## 4.1. Optical Evasion from Macropredators

Remaining undetected by predators is an efficient strategy to decrease the mortality rate of sessile benthic organisms. The reddish colouration of the benthic organisms studied here may help them avoid detection by macropredators. This can be explained by the optical properties of visible light.The reddish appearance of an object means that the red portion of the visible spectrum is reflected by its surface, while other wavelengths of visible light are absorbed. Red light has the longest wavelengths in the visible spectrum, and its energy is lower [18]. Such low-energy light is preferentially diffused under water, resulting in a loss of the red optical element at the bottom of the sublittoral zone [18, 19]. Benthic organisms that appear reddish under visible light conditions, therefore, would appear black in colour at the sublittoral bottom. Laqueus rubellus and other associated organisms on the outer shelf of Suruga Bay should appear dark in colour in their natural habitat, making it possible for them to go unrecognised by the eyes of macropredators such as fish and squid [20–24].Unlike the natural visibility of benthic organisms, their contrasting infrared visibility suggests the possibility of another survival strategy against predators. Almost all deep-sea fishes have eyes that are sensitive to light in the blue-to-green visible spectrum because these wavelengths can penetrate deeply into the ocean [24]. Malacosteids, however, have retinal pigments that are particularly sensitive to red light, and these fishes have been compared to snipers armed with infrared “snooperscopes” at night [25, 26]. One such predator, the malacosteid Photostomias guernei, has been reported in the seas around Japan, as well as in Suruga Bay [27, 28]. However, it is unlikely that Laqueus is affected by the long-wavelength sensitivity of deep-sea fishes, as it shows the similarly dark appearance of rocks and skeletal fragments. Laqueus shells under infrared light suggest that Laqueus has evolved a “Ninja” survival strategy in which its shell behaves optically like a nonliving object on the sublittoral bottom.


## 4.2. One Likely Possibility for the Evolutionary Arms Race between Sessile Benthic Organisms and Macropredators

The camouflage strategy ofLaqueus rubellus to the detection abilities of macropredators suggests that our results are not merely a coincidence but instead signal an intimate and evolutionary interplay or arms race. This leads to several evolutionary scenarios, as discussed below.Laqueusand the vision systems of its predators may have experienced selective pressure for optical evasion and detection ability of the photoreceptor, respectively. Each enhancement of one exerts selection for a compensating enhancement of the other. This is a form of coevolution [1, 29]. In addition to this predator-prey interaction, brachiopod survival on the sea bottom is also affected by competition among benthic organisms, which belong to a similar guild [30–32]. As a consequence, several species of the benthic community are involved, and their abundances are not independent. This corresponds to the concept of “diffuse (or guild) coevolution” [1].In the modern sea, highly efficient vision systems are evident in teleost fishes and coleoid cephalopods, both of which originated in the early Mesozoic and drastically diversified during the Jurassic [33–35]. Spiriferinids, which were one of the most thrived brachiopod groups and showed no indications of colour [36], became extinct soon after the diversification of the macropredators even though they possessed certain morphologies that are considered to be exquisite adaptations for feeding system [37–41]. On the other hand, terebratulids did not become extinct but began to diversify and persisted to the modern era [42]. Considering the improvement over time in the predation abilities of macropredators [43], our results suggest that the red colouration and infrared opacity of terebratulids is an effective adaptation to life at the sublittoral bottom, even though these organisms are immobile and seemingly defenceless.The relationship between the colouration and the apparent evolutionary trend motivated us to consider the aetiology of visibility and its evolution. Through biochemical analysis of intracrystalline proteins in the terebratulid shell, Cusack et al. [14] identified N-terminal amino acid sequence of 6.5 kDa protein that may function to embed a red carotenoprotein in the shell. Because Laqueus shells examined here tend to exhibit more vivid red colouration in larger individuals, the red pigment is probably deposited gradually during the growth of the secondary shell layer. Because the 6.5 kDa protein has been extracted from different shell layers in each species, it seems to represent a phylogenetic constraint [44].Enigmatic problems remain in this hypothesis, namely, the origin of infrared opacity and its evolution. Further studies will be needed to elucidate how terebratulids in the marine benthic community have evolved in response to increasing predation pressures.



---

*Source: 692517-2012-03-14.xml*