# Beam Scanning Properties of a Ferrite Loaded Microstrip Patch Antenna

Authors: Sheikh Sharif Iqbal Mitu; Farooq Sultan
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

Axially magnetized ferrite loaded microstrip patch antenna (MPA) with tunable beam scanning properties is presented. Ferrite cylinders are optimally positioned within the near field region of the patch to introduceEy phase tapers needed for beam scanning. The interaction between the radiated EM wave and the gyrotropic properties of ferrites is controlled by varying the magnetizing fields. A beam scan of ±30° is achieved for a DC biasing range of 0–0.19 T. Simulated antenna properties are verified using experimental results. Recent LTCC technology allows the biasing coils to be embedded within the ferrite material to considerably reduce the required external magnetizing field.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In recent wireless sensor and communication systems, antennas with beam scanning capability are of great interest to achieve reconfigurable coverage [1, 2]. Printed phased array antennas (PAA) are widely used in applications like target tracking and interference avoidance, where a costly and lossy network of phase shifters are needed to realize externally controllable directive beam scan [3]. The narrow half power beam width (HPBW) of a PAA can be a limiting factor for the beam scannable sector antennas used in RFID, GPS, and WLAN applications. Although microstrip patch antennas (MPA) with wider HPBW are more suited for the above mentioned applications, they lack the capability of beam scanning.In the literature, beam steering of MPA is investigated by Thongsopa et al. [4], where beam steering of a dual feed patch antenna depends on the difference between the input feed frequencies. Ha and Jung [5] have presented a wearable patch antenna, where main beam can be switched between 0° and ±30°. Attia et al. in [6] have achieved beam steer by using a specially designed superstrate layer. Cao et al. in [7] have achieved a maximum beam steer of 48° by introducing complementary split ring resonators (CSRR) in the ground plane of the MPA. Since the above techniques failed to scan the main beam in a continuous manner, a ferrite loaded microstrip patch antenna is proposed here with tunable beam scanning characteristics.When magnetized, gyrotropic properties of microwave ferrites are expressed using tensor permeability [8]. In the literature, ferrite phase shifters have been widely used to produce the progressive phase shift required to control the beam steering characteristics of microstrip phased array antennas [9]. As far as the single MPAs are concerned, interaction of the RF signal with magnetized ferrite material has been used for antenna miniaturization [10–13], widening the impedance bandwidth of the antennas [14–16], and frequency tuning [17–19]. One of the first attempts to use magnetized ferrite for beam switching involved putting ferrite rods inside a horn antenna [20]; the design resulted in a change in the main beam direction by ±22°. A number of antenna designs based on leaky wave cavities [21] and waveguide antennas [22] have been proposed where considerable beam scans have been achieved. The comprehensive literature search did not reveal any ferrite based beam scanning printed MPAs. A novel beam scanning technique for a single microstrip patch antenna (MPA) is presented here, where magnetized ferrite rods are optimally placed in the radiation region to control the Ey phase distribution of the radiated field. Professional simulator (HFSS) is used to demonstrate the wide HPBW and externally tunable scanning capabilities of the designed antenna, ideal for sectorwise coverage of communication devices. The optimized antenna is fabricated and tested to verify the simulated reflection and radiation properties.


## 2. Beam Scan Properties of Magnetized Ferrite Rods

Beam scanning for linear PAA is achieved by introducing a progressive phase shift(β) into the excitation signal of the individual elements [3]. This progressive phase shift results in a phase taper across the PAA aperture leading to a change in the direction of the main beam. For a two-element linear microstrip PAA with d=0.5λ operating at 10 GHz, the phase distributions of the radiated Ey-fields are shown in Figure 1.Figure 1
(a) Top view of a 2-patch 0.5λ PAA operating at 10 Ghz, (b) E-field phase distribution in the radiated field region of the 2-element PAA for different directions of the main beam.
(a)
(b)Note that Figure1(b) plots the Ey phase distribution resulting from a change in the direction of the main beam (θ) for θ=90° (broadside), 100°, 110° and 120°, realized by selecting progressive phase excitation with β=0°, 31.3°, 61.1° and 90°, respectively [3]. For a single MPA, β does not apply; hence, to scan the main beam, the same amount of phase taper has to be produced in the radiated signal by some other mechanisms.Magnetized ferrite is known to affect the magnitude and phase of the transmitting RF signal if properly aligned. To understand the phase control properties of ferrite, a Y220 ferrite cylinder withr=6 mm, lf=20 mm, εr=15.4, 4πMs=1950 Gauss, and ΔH=10 Oe was placed in the path of propagating plane waves (inside a WR110 rectangular waveguide with a cutoff of 6.4 GHz) and the properties of the transmitted signal were observed. For an operating frequency of 10 GHz, the simulated (HFSS) magnitude and phase of the transmitted signal as a function of the biasing (H0) are plotted in Figure 2. Note that as the biasing (H0) starts to increase the magnitude of the transmitted signal starts to increase and becomes maximum at 0.245 T. A low attenuation operating region (yellow shaded) has been indicated in Figure 2; changing the external magnetizing field (ΔH0) by 0.048 T in this low-loss operating region results in a 57° change in the insertion phase (Δϕ) while maintaining maximum transmission throughout. This property of the ferrite to affect the phase of the passing RF signal can be used to create a phase taper similar to the one shown in Figure 1(b) that would cause beam scan. In the above resonance region, a phase change of nearly 100° can be achieved by changing Ho from 0.3147 T to 0.3513 T.Figure 2
Magnitude and phase of the transmitted signal through a ferrite cylinder when excited by plane waves in a rectangular waveguide.


## 3. Design of Ferrite Loaded Patch Antenna

The schematic diagram of the designed microstrip patch antenna (MPA) loaded with two separately magnetized ferrite rods is shown in Figure3. In order to produce a beam scan in the azimuth plane, a phase taper in the E-field along the x-axis (Figure 3) has to be produced. It has been observed that Ey becomes the dominant component of the radiated field along the x-axis and the x- and y-components of the E-field are very low in magnitude. Thus a phase taper in the Ey is desired for a beam scan in the E-plane. Since a phase taper in the x-axis is needed, two ferrite rods have been placed along the x-axis on either side of the radiating patch. As already observed from Section 2, magnetized ferrite rod can change the phase of the transmitting signal; hence, biasing one of the ferrite rods at a time would decrease the phase of the signal passing through it resulting in a phase taper across the x-axis, leading to a beam scan.Figure 3
Magnetized ferrite loaded patch antenna: (a) top view and (b) side view.
(a)
(b)


### 3.1. Microstrip Patch Antenna Design

The MPA is designed on a Duroid substrate withεr=2.2, t=1.6 mm. Professional software (HFSS) is used to optimize the designed coaxially fed patch to resonate at 10 GHz. The optimized dimensions of the MPA are hsub=1.6 mm, Wferr=40 mm, Lferr=40 mm, Wp=8.5 mm, and Lp=8.72 mm. The ferrite rods are then loaded onto the MPA to introduce beam scanning. Figure 4 plots the simulated reflection response (S11) of the antenna, with and without ferrite loading. The 3D directivity patterns are also included; pattern 1 corresponds to the MPA without ferrite loading and pattern 2 corresponds to MPA with ferrite loading. Note that loading ferrite rods reduced the impedance bandwidth of the antenna by 1.2% (to 723.7 MHz). Moreover, changing the DC biasing fields (H01 or H02), to realize beam scan, has no effect on the reflection characteristics as the impedance bandwidth and the center frequency remain unchanged. This is shown in Figure 5.Figure 4
SimulatedS11 curves for the MPA with and without the ferrite superstrate.Figure 5
Simulated impedance bandwidth (−10 dB bandwidth) and center frequency for the ferrite loaded MPA for varying biasingH01.


### 3.2. Placement and Dimension of the Ferrite Rods

The parameters related to the physical dimensions of the ferrite rods, shown in Figure3, are discussed in this section. To facilitate beam steer in ±θ° angles from the broad side direction, the ferrite rods are separately biased using magnetizing fields, H01 and H02. With H01=0 or unbiased, changing H02 values steered the main beam of the MPA towards -θ angles (θ=80°, 70°,…). Alternatively, by changing the magnetizing field H01, the main beam is observed to steer towards +θ angles (θ=100°, 110°,…). Selecting correct magnetizing field (H0), position (xf,h), and the dimensions (df,hf) of these ferrite rods is critical to achieve optimum gain and beam scanning properties. A professional simulator (HFSS) is used to carry out a comprehensive parametric analysis of the four variables, xf, h, df, and hf.SettingH01=0, the simulated parametric sweep with increasing values of H02 is plotted in Figure 6. It is observed that beam scan depended on the difference between H01 and H02 and remains in the broadside direction with both ferrites unbiased (H01=H02=0). Figure 6(a) plots the changing radiation parameters of the antenna with varying diameter of the ferrite rods (df). For fixed values of the height (hf=20 mm) and separation (xf=20 mm), increasing the diameter to 6 mm changes the scan angle by Δθ=-26° for a differential magnetizing field of ΔH02=0.19 T. Note that the gain of the antenna remains constant for the whole range of the biasing field. A further increase in df reduced the antenna gain without improving the scan angle. Considering the parametric sweep for ferrite length (hf) in Figure 6(b), it is clear that a taller ferrite rod offers more beam scan compared to shorter ones. However, this also increases the antenna dimension in addition to reducing the antenna gain for a given value of H02. Note that the optimum value, hf=20 mm, produces a maximum beam scan of −26°  (θ=64°) from broadside for ΔH02=0.19 T, where the antenna gain remains nearly constant at 7.8 dB. Figure 6(c) clearly indicates that increasing the spacing “h” between the patch surface and the ferrite rod tends to decrease the scan angle. This is due to the formation of the partially resonant cavity between the substrate and the ferrite rod, which supports additional modes. The parameter h=16 mm is chosen, as it offers a good beam scan with best antenna gain throughout the sweep (ΔH02). Optimum positioning of ferrite rods can facilitate more interaction between the ferrites and radiated EM waves to maximize the phase taper. In Figure 6(d), it is clear that placing the ferrite rods closer to the nonradiating edges of MPA provides higher beam scans at the cost of reduced antenna gain. Note that xf=20 mm provides the best compromise between the scan angle and antenna gain for the whole range of H02. Thus, the optimized antenna parameters that resulted in best combination of scan angle and antenna gain are hf=20 mm, xf=20 mm, df=6 mm, and h=16 mm. To achieve opposite directional beam scan, opposite biasing scheme is needed with unbiased H02 and increasing values of H01 from 0 to 1.Figure 6
ForH01=0, the changes in beam scan angle (degrees) and the maximum gain are plotted for different values of (a) df, (b) hf, (c) h, and (d) xf. Dotted green lines represent the gain and the solid blue lines represent the scan angle.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.1. Microstrip Patch Antenna Design

The MPA is designed on a Duroid substrate withεr=2.2, t=1.6 mm. Professional software (HFSS) is used to optimize the designed coaxially fed patch to resonate at 10 GHz. The optimized dimensions of the MPA are hsub=1.6 mm, Wferr=40 mm, Lferr=40 mm, Wp=8.5 mm, and Lp=8.72 mm. The ferrite rods are then loaded onto the MPA to introduce beam scanning. Figure 4 plots the simulated reflection response (S11) of the antenna, with and without ferrite loading. The 3D directivity patterns are also included; pattern 1 corresponds to the MPA without ferrite loading and pattern 2 corresponds to MPA with ferrite loading. Note that loading ferrite rods reduced the impedance bandwidth of the antenna by 1.2% (to 723.7 MHz). Moreover, changing the DC biasing fields (H01 or H02), to realize beam scan, has no effect on the reflection characteristics as the impedance bandwidth and the center frequency remain unchanged. This is shown in Figure 5.Figure 4
SimulatedS11 curves for the MPA with and without the ferrite superstrate.Figure 5
Simulated impedance bandwidth (−10 dB bandwidth) and center frequency for the ferrite loaded MPA for varying biasingH01.


## 3.2. Placement and Dimension of the Ferrite Rods

The parameters related to the physical dimensions of the ferrite rods, shown in Figure3, are discussed in this section. To facilitate beam steer in ±θ° angles from the broad side direction, the ferrite rods are separately biased using magnetizing fields, H01 and H02. With H01=0 or unbiased, changing H02 values steered the main beam of the MPA towards -θ angles (θ=80°, 70°,…). Alternatively, by changing the magnetizing field H01, the main beam is observed to steer towards +θ angles (θ=100°, 110°,…). Selecting correct magnetizing field (H0), position (xf,h), and the dimensions (df,hf) of these ferrite rods is critical to achieve optimum gain and beam scanning properties. A professional simulator (HFSS) is used to carry out a comprehensive parametric analysis of the four variables, xf, h, df, and hf.SettingH01=0, the simulated parametric sweep with increasing values of H02 is plotted in Figure 6. It is observed that beam scan depended on the difference between H01 and H02 and remains in the broadside direction with both ferrites unbiased (H01=H02=0). Figure 6(a) plots the changing radiation parameters of the antenna with varying diameter of the ferrite rods (df). For fixed values of the height (hf=20 mm) and separation (xf=20 mm), increasing the diameter to 6 mm changes the scan angle by Δθ=-26° for a differential magnetizing field of ΔH02=0.19 T. Note that the gain of the antenna remains constant for the whole range of the biasing field. A further increase in df reduced the antenna gain without improving the scan angle. Considering the parametric sweep for ferrite length (hf) in Figure 6(b), it is clear that a taller ferrite rod offers more beam scan compared to shorter ones. However, this also increases the antenna dimension in addition to reducing the antenna gain for a given value of H02. Note that the optimum value, hf=20 mm, produces a maximum beam scan of −26°  (θ=64°) from broadside for ΔH02=0.19 T, where the antenna gain remains nearly constant at 7.8 dB. Figure 6(c) clearly indicates that increasing the spacing “h” between the patch surface and the ferrite rod tends to decrease the scan angle. This is due to the formation of the partially resonant cavity between the substrate and the ferrite rod, which supports additional modes. The parameter h=16 mm is chosen, as it offers a good beam scan with best antenna gain throughout the sweep (ΔH02). Optimum positioning of ferrite rods can facilitate more interaction between the ferrites and radiated EM waves to maximize the phase taper. In Figure 6(d), it is clear that placing the ferrite rods closer to the nonradiating edges of MPA provides higher beam scans at the cost of reduced antenna gain. Note that xf=20 mm provides the best compromise between the scan angle and antenna gain for the whole range of H02. Thus, the optimized antenna parameters that resulted in best combination of scan angle and antenna gain are hf=20 mm, xf=20 mm, df=6 mm, and h=16 mm. To achieve opposite directional beam scan, opposite biasing scheme is needed with unbiased H02 and increasing values of H01 from 0 to 1.Figure 6
ForH01=0, the changes in beam scan angle (degrees) and the maximum gain are plotted for different values of (a) df, (b) hf, (c) h, and (d) xf. Dotted green lines represent the gain and the solid blue lines represent the scan angle.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 4. Results

The simulatedEy phase distribution across the patch is plotted in Figure 7 for H01=0 and four different values of H02. Note that, for changing the biasing field H02 by ΔH02=0.225 T, the Ey phase distribution changes by approximately 38°, which steers the main beam of the MPA by Δθ=-25° (or θ=65°). Similarly, to scan the main beam from broadside to θ=120°, the ferrite rods needed to be biased with H02=0 and ΔH01=0.225 T. Figure 8 shows the prototype of the fabricated antenna. The coils that use variable DC current sources to axially magnetize the ferrite rods are also shown in the figure. Using Tesla meter, the ferrite filled coils are precalibrated to relate the coil currents with induced magnetizing fields. For packaging purposes, the positions of the ferrite rods are secured by a Styrofoam (ɛr≈1) cube, as shown in Figure 8(b). This also allows the removal of the plastic pipes, used to position the ferrite rods in Figure 8(a).Figure 7
E
y phase distribution in the NF region for different scan angles.Figure 8
Fabricated 10 GHz MPA loaded with ferrite rods, (a) ferrite rods with biasing coils and (b) with Styrofoam packing.
(a)
(b)A vector network analyzer is used to measure the reflection response (S11) of the ferrite loaded antenna. Figure 9 shows the simulated and experimental S11 responses of the ferrite loaded microstrip patch antenna (MPA). It is observed that separately magnetizing ferrites have no effects on the impedance bandwidth and the resonance of the antenna. Using an antenna measurement setup, the beam scanning properties of the designed antenna are experimentally observed.Figure 9
Simulated and experimentalS11 responses of the ferrite loaded MPA.A comparison of the measured and simulated radiation patterns of the antenna withH01=0 and changing values of H02 is plotted in Figure 10. Note that maximum simulated scan angles of ±30° are verified by the measured radiation patterns at +28° and −26°, respectively. Higher back lobes and minor mismatch between simulated and experimental patterns are due to unwanted reflections normally eliminated by the anechoic chamber. It can be observed from Figure 10(a) that, for no beam scan case, the maximum measured directivity is 7.097 dB and the respective measured directivities at 64° and 118° are 5.255 dB and 6.069 dB. It must be noted that inclusion of ferrite rods and the biasing coils has minimal effect on the radiation properties of the designed antenna and the measured HPBW and directivity values for the MPA without superstrate, with only ferrite, and with ferrite and biasing coils are provided in Table 1. When scanning the main beam to either of the maximum scan angles, 64° (Figure 10(b)) and 118° (Figure 10(c)), the peak directivity values measured at the respective directions of maximum are 6.69 dB and 6.53 dB. Additionally the directivity measured in the original direction of maximum (90°) during beam scanning is 3.091 dB and 5.342 dB for 64° and 118°, respectively. Although this antenna may seem bulky, using recent embedded windings technology available for LTCC ferrite devices can reduce the height and biasing requirement of the antenna by 95% [19].Table 1
Measured HPBW and directivity for designed antenna withH01=H02=0.
HPBW (deg)
Directivity (dB)
MPA without superstrate
81
6.687
MPA with ferrite superstrate,without biasing coils
82.4
7.139
MPA with ferrite superstrate,with biasing coils
83
7.097Figure 10
Comparison of measured and simulated 2D radiation patterns: (a)θ=90° for H01=H02=0, (b) θ=64° for H01=0 and H02=0.19 T, and (c) θ=118° for H01=0.19 T and H02=0 T.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 5. Conclusion

Beam scanning characteristics of a ferrite loaded single MPA are presented. Using this novel method, ferrite rods are placed in the radiation region of the antenna to perturb theE-field phase distribution resulting in beam scan. Parametric analysis resulted in finding the optimum dimension, location, and biasing requirements of the ferrite rods. A simulated beam scan of Δθ=±30° is achieved for a changing biasing field of ΔH0=0.214 T. The designed antenna is fabricated to experimentally observe a beam scan of +28° and −26° for predicted changes of external magnetizing fields. Using recent LTCC ferrite techniques, the requirements of biasing field can be reduced by 95%.



---

*Source: 697409-2015-05-19.xml*