# Dynamic Route Choice Prediction Model Based on Connected Vehicle Guidance Characteristics

Authors: Jiangfeng Wang; Jiarun Lv; Chao Wang; Zhiqi Zhang
Journal: Journal of Advanced Transportation
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

A route choice prediction model is proposed considering the connected vehicle guidance characteristics. This model is proposed to prevent the delay in the release of guidance information and route planning due to inaccurate timing predictions of the traditional guidance systems. Based on the analysis of the impact of different connected vehicle (CV) guidance strategies on traffic flow, an indexes system for CV guidance characteristics is presented. Selecting five characteristic indexes, a route choice prediction model is designed using the logistic model. A simulation scenario is established by programming different agents for controlling the flow of vehicles and for information acquisition and transmission. The prediction model is validated using the simulation scenario, and the simulation results indicate that the characteristic indexes have a significant influence on the probability of choosing a particular route. The average root mean square error (RMSE) of the prediction model is 3.19%, which indicates that the calibration model shows a good prediction performance. In the implementation of CV guidance, the penetration rate can be considered an optional index in the adjustment of the guidance effect.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The connected vehicle (CV) guidance system is a new type of guidance system. This system realizes dynamic vehicle guidance by utilizing connected vehicle technologies. Based on the vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V), vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I), and vehicle-to-smart terminal (V2T) technologies, the CV guidance system facilitates dynamic guidance for road network flow using real-time traffic information. Traditional guidance systems have several shortcomings such as the delay in the release of guidance information and route planning due to inaccurate timing predictions. The CV guidance overcomes these shortcomings and enhances the spatial-temporal guidance efficiency in road networks.The United States (US), the European Union (EU), and Japan have conducted a study on dynamic route guidance using connected vehicle (CV) technologies; these countries have launched their own application projects, including Connected Vehicle [1], AERIS [2], DRIVE C2X [3], and Smartway [4]. These projects have helped improve the travelling efficiency of the road network, propose many road guidance theories and methods, and conduct corresponding field applications [5–8] by applying the CV technologies to dynamic route guidance. Recently, Beijing, Shenzhen, and Chongqing also have applied the concept of wireless communication to dynamic route guidance [9, 10].Over the years, many researchers have paid attention to the theory and algorithm of route guidance and proposed various optimization algorithms to analyze their impact on the road network flow [11]. Some intelligent algorithms for route guidance have been proposed, such as the Dijkstra algorithm [12], Floyd algorithm [13], A∗ algorithm [14], genetic algorithm [15], neural network algorithm [16], and ant colony optimization [17]. Su et al. [18] proposed a multiobjective and multipath optimization selection method based on the genetic algorithm. The algorithm can provide several alternative routes and satisfies drivers’ varying preferences. Furthermore, travelling fitness functions were designed to provide better multiroute selection. A dynamic route guidance method based on the real-time forecast of traffic information was proposed to solve the problem of seeking answers ineffectively in a route guidance algorithm. This method combined the neural network algorithm and the genetic algorithm, and the proposed method improved the computation efficiency and solution quality [19]. Yang [20] analyzed the major factors that influence the choice of optimal route and then provided an improved K-optimal chaos ant colony algorithm. The results of a simulation experiment showed that the algorithm has much higher capacity for global optimization and can use the basic ant colony algorithm to optimize the route choice. Introducing the idea of depth parameter, Lee and Kim [21] combined the Dijkstra algorithm and A∗ algorithm to propose a hybrid route guidance algorithm. Experimental results indicated that the algorithm reduced the computation cost considerably compared to the costs involved in traditional searching algorithms.Nowadays, scholars have begun to study route guidance in a connected vehicle (CV) environment. Tian et al. [22] presented a real-time route guidance system based on CV technologies, and simulation results showed that better routes are found using the V2V and V2I technologies. Paikari et al. [23] realized CV guidance by developing a V2V and V2I application interface (API). Experimental results demonstrated that the extended simulation system can handle the load of urban freeways and reduce crash risks. Chim et al. [24] proposed a navigation scheme in the CV environment using anonymous credentials and limited jurisdiction, and they addressed the security requirements associated with CV guidance. Vreeswijk et al. [25] proposed a CV guidance strategy based on travelling bounded rationality degree. The results showed that the proposed strategy can effectively reduce the total travel time and realize the goal of system optimal guidance. Genders and Razavi [26] used V2V communication to share warning information about the work zone to nearby vehicles, and a dynamic route guidance algorithm was proposed. The results showed that the CV penetration rate of less than 40% contributes to a safer traffic network for vehicles in the work zone. In general, these studies cannot comprehensively reflect the impact of the CV guidance characteristics on route choice, although the penetration rate was considered.Existing route guidance research mainly focuses on route guidance algorithms [16, 17, 27–29], guidance strategy [30–32], and system design [33] using traditional data detectors. CV technologies allow for some innovative means for data acquisition, and many scholars have attempted to study the dynamic route guidance models in a CV environment [32, 34, 35]. Several studies have even considered the influence of CV characteristics, such as penetration rate [24, 26, 36–38]. However, existing research does not provide a detailed analysis of the CV guidance characteristics. Therefore, this paper presents a CV guidance algorithm based on the proposed CV guidance characteristic indexes. A simulation experiment is conducted to analyze the prediction accuracy.


## 2. Prediction Model

In a CV environment, travellers receive traffic guidance information using V2V and V2I technologies and select the optimum route according to the guidance strategy. Different guidance strategies have different effects on the flow distribution of a road network. Figure1 shows the guidance effect of different guidance strategies in a CV guidance environment. The guidance information from the variable message signs (VMS) is received during traffic congestion on a route to reduce the arrival flow. The arrival flow is shown by the line representing guidance strategy 1 in Figure 1. Considering the large delay in information release, the guidance effect has not been exhibited well. Using the V2V technology, the guidance information is transmitted in time, and the arrival flow is shown by the line representing guidance strategy 3 in Figure 1. However, guidance strategy 3 might generate surplus capacity, as indicated by the area of the triangle EFG. Hence, this guidance strategy is not a good option and the optimal option would be guidance strategy 2. Therefore, a reasonable guidance strategy can be obtained by adjusting the CV guidance characteristics, such as the penetration rate.Figure 1
Impact of CV guidance strategy on traffic flow.ts—start time of traffic congestion; tcvs—start time of CV guidance strategy 3; tcve—end time of CV guidance strategy 3; t1—end time of CV guidance strategy 2; t2—end time of guidance strategy 1; te—end time of congestion.The CV guidance characteristics have a direct impact on the guidance effect. The characteristic indexes for CV guidance features are shown in Figure2.Figure 2
Indexes system for CV guidance characteristics.In this study, five characteristic indexes were chosen as the variables for analysis: compliance rate (CR), following rate (FR), penetration rate (PR), release delay time (DT), and congestion level (CL). CR is the ratio of vehicles with CV ability to comply route adjustments to all vehicles with CV ability. FR refers to the ratio of vehicles without CV ability following to adjust the route because of the influence of the leading vehicle changing the route to vehicles without CV ability. PR refers to the proportion of vehicles with CV ability to all vehicles. DT refers to the interval from the generation of traffic information to the reception of traffic information by the vehicle. CL is an important index for evaluating the flow operation states of the road network, and the duration of congestion caused by an accident vehicle is used as an alternative variable in this paper.To study the influence of the CV guidance characteristic indexes on route choice behavior, the route choice model was established using the logistic model. Utility refers to a metric that should be maximized to satisfy travellers’ demands, such as travel time. The logistic model is based on the utility maximization theory, which states that all vehicles will always choose the route with maximum utility during the route selection process. The utility is represented by the following equation:(1)Uj=∑n=1Nβnjxnj+β0,whereUj is the utility of the choice routej,xjn is the explanatory variable for the characteristics index n of the choice routej, βnj is the coefficient ofxjn, and β0 is a constant.In a CV environment, origin-destination (od) pairs haver(r≥2) routes. The route choice model is(2)GLjod=ln⁡PjodPJod=βjod+∑nβjnodxjn,j=1,2,…,r-1,where GLjod is the utility of the choice route Ljod relative to the reference route LJod  (j≠J); Pjod and PJod are the probabilities of the choice routes Ljod and LJod, respectively. βjod is a constant; βjnod is the coefficient of the explanatory variable xjn; xjn is the explanatory variable for the characteristic indexn of the choice routejin a CV environment.Based on (2), assuming Pjod/PJod=eGLjod and ∑j=1r-1eGLjod=∑j=1r-1Pjod/PJod=y, the route choice probability in a CV environment is as follows:(3)Pjod=eGLjod1+y.


## 3. Model Validation

To verify the effectiveness of the route choice model, a simple road network scenario is designed, which includes three routes and four 3-way intersections, as shown in Figure3. In the initialization stage, vehicles with connected vehicle ability (CVs) and vehicles without connected vehicle ability (non-CVs) are arranged in the road network. Car-Agent is used to control the vehicles’ traffic behaviors, such as car following and lane changing by programming the agents using the EstiNet tool. The Roadside Unit (RSU) at an intersection is used to collect the traffic volume entering the intersection and transmit the volume to the Central-Roadside Unit (C-RSU) in real time. The C-RSU is responsible for receiving the volume from the downstream intersections; it calculates the shortest route using the Bureau of Public Roads (BPR) impedance function. To generate the traffic congestion, a broken vehicle (BV) was set on route 1. During the simulation stage, all vehicles, including CV and Non-CV, choose the shortest route to travel depending on the real-time traffic information obtained through V2V and V2I communication. When the simulation starts, the BV sends the accident information to the C-RSU. Meanwhile, the C-RSU broadcasts the real-time traffic information to all vehicles. CVs will choose the shortest route to travel according to the CV guidance information, and non-CVs will choose their routes to travel based on their own reasonable judgment. For example, these non-CVs may change their initial route following the leading vehicles depending on the FR.Figure 3
CV guidance simulation scenario.The basic parameters of the simulation are listed in Table1. The total number of vehicles including CVs and non-CVs is 100 vehicles, which is represented by the parameter of number of vehicles.Table 1
Basic parameters of the simulation.
Parameters Values Parameters Values Simulation time (s) 1800 Number of intersections 4 Number of vehicles 100 Number of road sections 12 Maximum velocity (m/s) 18 MAC communication protocol IEEE802. 11p Acceleration velocity (m/s2) −4 to 1 CL (s) 300/500 Transit power (m) 1000 PR (%) 25/50/75/100 Number of lanes 2 CR (%) 25/50/75/100 Lane width (m) 3.5 FR (%) 0/10/20/30 Vehicle type Passenger car unit DT (s) 0/120/180Using the CV guidance scenario, the five characteristic indexes with their corresponding values were selected for simulation. 312 simulation experiments were carried out, and the experimental samples were divided into 200 calibration samples and 112 test samples. Using the calibration samples and considering route 3 as the reference choice route, the multinomial logit model is used to obtain the coefficients of variables. The calibrated results are as follows:(4)GL1x=1.608PR+2.006CR+1.881FR-0.085CL0+0.280DT0+0.114DT1-3.582,GL2x=3.143PR+3.494CR+3.737FR-0.413CL0+0.487DT0+0.126DT1-7.046.In the next section, the test samples are used to evaluate the performance of the proposed route choice model and analyze the impact of the five characteristic indexes on the route choice.


## 4. Results Analysis

To verify the effects of CV guidance, the results of sample1 (without guidance) and sample 2 (with guidance) were compared, and the results are listed in Table 2. With CV guidance, the average travel time on the entire road network decreased by 20.31%. The volume distribution ratios in route 2 and route 3 gradually tend to balance one another in the CV guidance environment, as shown in Figure 4.Table 2
Distribution of volume and average travel time for different routes.
Flow distribution ratio (%) Travel time (s) Route 1 Route 2 Route 3 Route 1 Route 2 Route 3 Mean Sample 1 87 8 5 1325.19 1076.73 1004.92 1289.30 Sample 2 11 43 46 1006.22 1055.50 1006.37 1027.48  Savings 87.36%↓ 81.40%↑ 89.13%↑ 24.07%↓ 1.97%↓ 0.14%↑ 20.31%↓Figure 4
Volume distribution of each route in CV guidance environment.The PR is one of the most important characteristic indexes, which determines the proportion of CVs. Figure5 illustrates the impact of the PR on the probability of the route choice in a CV guidance environment. The figure also illustrates that a higher proportion of CV vehicles will choose route 2 and route 3 as the PR increases. Finally, the distribution of volume will even out when the PR is approximately 100%. This may be because more CVs will follow the guidance information to choose the optimal route 2 to travel when route 1 is blocked owing to an increase in the PR. With an increase in the impedance of route 2, the CV will choose route 3 to travel.Figure 5
Impact of different PR values on probability of route choice.Figures6(a) and 6(b) show the impact of different CR and FR values on the choice probability of route 2 and route 3 in a CV guidance environment. With an increase in the FR, the choice probability of route 2 and route 3 increases steadily. On the other hand, the index CR has a more obvious impact on the probability of route choice. Overall, an increasing number of vehicles will choose a detour as the FR and CR increase when route 1 is blocked, and the traffic impedance values of route 2 and route 3 gradually reach a state of equilibrium. Figure 6 indicates that the indexes FR and CR have a significant influence on the probability of route choice, which is consistent with the theoretical expectations.Figure 6
Influence of different FR and CR values on route choice probability of routes 2 and 3.
(a) (b)Using the test samples, a calibration model is employed to predict the vehicles’ route choice considering the impact of the five characteristic indexes, and the prediction accuracy is analyzed using the root mean square error (RMSE). The prediction results of the calibration model are presented in Table3. It is shown in the table that the prediction accuracy of the route choice ranges from 2.40% to 4.52% for different values of the five characteristic indexes. The prediction accuracy of the calibration model is high for all PR values, while the index of the CR has a significant influence on the prediction accuracy of the calibration model, which shows relatively big fluctuation. Overall, the average RMSE of the calibration model is 3.19%, which indicates that the calibration model shows a good prediction performance.Table 3
Influence of CV characteristics indexes on prediction accuracy.
CL (s) 300 500 — — RMSE 3.23% 3.15% — — DT (s) 0 120 180 — RMSE 2.89% 3.06% 3.64% — PR (%) 25 50 75 100 RMSE 2.96% 2.62% 3.93% 3.61% CR (%) 25 50 75 100 RMSE 2.88% 2.40% 3.18% 4.52% FR (%) 10 20 30 40 RMSE 3.08% 2.49% 3.30% 3.84%The following section will analyze the impact of the five characteristic indexes on the prediction accuracy. Figure7 shows the influence of the indexes FR, CR, and FR on the prediction accuracy of the calibration model. It is concluded from Figure 7 that the prediction accuracy decreases initially and then increases with an increase in the values of FR, CR, and FR. A reasonable prediction accuracy is obtained when the values of PR, CR, and FR are 50%, 50%, and 10%, respectively.Figure 7
Influence of PR, CR, and FR on RMSE of calibration model.Figure8 shows the influence of the indexes CL and DT on the prediction accuracy. The RMSE of the calibration model decreases with an increase in the value of the CL. This might be explained by a more stable route choice behavior in congestion states, and the calibration model has a higher prediction accuracy of route choice. When the value of the CL is 500 s, the model has a smaller RMSE, which indicates that the calibration model exhibits better prediction in a congested environment. The RMSE of the calibration model increases with an increase in the value of the DT, which shows that the delay in the release of traffic information has a negative effect on the prediction accuracy. This might be explained by a more confused route choice behavior for a bigger release delay time, and the calibration model has a lower prediction accuracy of route choice. The real-time release of the CV guidance information helps the vehicles choose a suitable route to avoid traffic congestion.Figure 8
Influence of CL and DT on RMSE of calibration model.


## 5. Conclusion

A route choice model was proposed considering the characteristics of CV guidance; this model was validated using the EstiNet simulation tool. The effect on CV guidance was statistically analyzed, and the impact of the five characteristic indexes on the prediction accuracy of the calibration model was studied. The simulation results showed that the indexes PR, FR, and CR had a significant influence on the probability of route choice, which was consistent with the theoretical expectations. Overall, the average RMSE of the calibration model was 3.19%, which indicates that the calibration model exhibits a good prediction performance. In the implementation of CV guidance, the PR can be considered an optional index to adjust the guidance effect.There are several considerations for future research works. First, the route choice model will be calibrated and validated through a field experiment to provide better understanding of the benefit of CV guidance. Second, more characteristic indexes will be considered in the design of the route choice model in a CV environment.



---

*Source: 6905431-2017-02-14.xml*