# Lithium Sulfide as Cathode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries: Advances and Challenges

Authors: Luoting Zhou; Wenkui Zhang; Yangfeng Wang; Sheng Liang; Yongping Gan; Hui Huang; Jun Zhang; Yang Xia; Chu Liang
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

Due to the ever-growing demand for high-density energy storage devices, lithium-ion batteries with a high-capacity cathode and anode are thought to be the next-generation batteries for their high energy density. Lithium sulfide (Li2S) is considered the promising cathode material for its high theoretical capacity, high melting point, affordable volume expansion, and lithium composition. This review summarizes the activation and lithium storage mechanism of Li2S cathodes. The design strategies in improving the electrochemical performance are highlighted. The application of the Li2S cathode in full cells of lithium-ion batteries is discussed. The challenges and new directions in commercial applications of Li2S cathodes are also pointed out.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are widely used in portable electronic equipment, electric vehicles, and large-scale energy storage devices due to their relatively high energy density and long cycle life. Currently, the intercalation-type lithium storage materials with high cycling stability are employed as the main cathode and anode materials for commercialized LIBs. However, the intercalation-type cathode materials such as LiFePO4, LiMnO4, and LiCoO2 suffer from low theoretical capacity (<200 mAh·g−1), which fail to meet the ever-increasing need of higher energy density. Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries as the representative of nonintercalation-type lithium storage materials have very high energy density (2600 W·h·kg−1), more than 8 times that of currently commercialized LIBs [1, 2], and are regarded as one of the most promising secondary batteries with high energy density.Both sulfur and its fully lithiated state of Li2S can be used as active cathode materials for Li-S batteries. A sulfur-based composite cathode should be coupled with the lithium metal or lithium-containing anode. The low electronic and ionic conductivity is the intrinsic characteristics of elemental sulfur, leading to low specific capacity and poor rate performance. The various soluble lithium polysulfides (3 ≤ n ≤ 8) are produced during charging and discharging. The shuttle effect of dissolved lithium polysulfides results in active material loss and rapid capacity fading. The volume change is as high as 80% in the conversion of S (2.07 g·cm−3) into Li2S (1.66 g·cm−3). The repeated volumetric expansion and contraction will accelerate the cathode pulverization and the loss of electronic contact [3–6]. Lithium sulfide (Li2S), as the fully lithiated state of sulfur, can not only deliver a high theoretical specific capacity (1166 mAh·g−1) but also avoid the volumetric expansion, resulting in a more stable microstructure and electrochemical performance [7]. The high melting point (938°C) and solubility in some organic solvents make Li2S more advantageous in the synthesis of composites. Despite the above differences between the S cathode and the Li2S cathode, the greatest challenge of Li-S batteries is the safety problems caused by using the metallic lithium anode. The internal short circuit arising from the formation of lithium dendrites is the major risk for Li-S batteries [8].However, the Li2S cathode can be used in LIB pairing with safer lithium metal-free anodes (e.g., graphite, silicon, and Sn) for its lithium composition, which can avoid the safety problems caused by lithium metal anodes. Compared with the Li-S batteries, the LIBs using the Li2S materials as cathodes can reach an energy density as high as that of Li-S batteries, which is several times that of the current commercial LIBs which use intercalation-type cathode materials such as LiFePO4, LiMnO4, and LiCoO2, and advance in safety by avoiding the use of lithium metal anodes. The above advantages make lithium sulfide a promising cathode material for LIBs.Like elemental sulfur, Li2S suffers from the shuttle of lithium polysulfides and low electronic and ionic conductivity as well. High initial kinetics barrier during charging is another problem for Li2S cathode materials. Many strategies have been reported to improve the electrochemical lithium storage performance of Li2S as cathode materials for secondary batteries. This review summarizes recent progress in Li2S-based composite cathode materials. First, we summarize the activation process during initial charging and reversible lithium storage mechanism of Li2S. The strategies for improving the electrochemical performance of the Li2S cathode for lithium-ion batteries (half cells) are then highlighted. Finally, we discuss the design and progress in Li2S-based cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries (full cells). We hope that this review will provide a fundamental understanding on the lithium storage mechanism of the advanced cathode materials.


## 2. Activation and Lithium Storage Mechanism of Li2S Cathodes

As the fully lithiated product of sulfur, Li2S exhibits a same lithium storage mechanism except the initial activation process, which can only be observed in the first delithiation process of Li2S. The activation process and reaction mechanism of Li2S are illustrated in Figure 1 [9]. During the initial charge (Figure 1(a)), the voltage rises to 3.45 V and then rapidly drops to about 2.4 V, representing the initial potential barrier from phase nucleation of polysulfides. Subsequently, a long voltage plateau is seen at ∼2.4 V, and then the voltage gradually increases to 3.4 V and goes up to 4.0 rapidly. It is believed that the activations are related to the phase nucleation of polysulfides and charge transfer during the oxidation of Li2S in the first charge process. The oxidation of Li2S is achieved through the direct charge transfer between the solid Li2S and conducting materials. The potential barrier is found to be strongly dependent on the current density in the activation (Figures 1(b) and 1(c)). It should be noted that the potential barrier is quite weak at a very small current density of C/1000 (approaches the zero current), whereas the potential barrier increases rapidly when the current density is over C/200, as shown in Figure 1(b). This result means that the delithiation process of Li2S is thermodynamically favorable but kinetically unfavorable.Figure 1
(a) Charge-discharge profile of the Li2S electrode in the initial three cycles. (b) CV curves of the Li2S electrode. (c) Initial potential barrier at different current. (d) Overpotential at different current rates. (e) Initial charging process of Li2S [9].
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)As shown in Figure1(d), the first charging process can be divided into four steps.Steps 1 and 2 (before the barrier top):(1)Li2Ss⟶Li2−xSs+xLi++xe−Step 3 (in the middle of charging):(2)yLi2Ss⟶Li2Syl+2y−2Li++2y−2e−(3)Li2Syl⟶y8Li2S8l+2−y4Li++2−y4e−Step 4 (at the end of charging):(4)Li2Syl⟶y8Li2S8l+2−y4Li++2−y4e−A high potential barrier in steps 1 and 2 can be attributed to the phase nucleation of polysulfides, in which a large amount of energy is needed to increase charge and ionic conductivity. In step 3, the disappearance of potential barrier and the formation of polysulfides cause faster charge transfer because charge can move rapidly between Li2S, lithium polysulfide, and electrolytes. At the end of charging, potential barrier is not seen due to the existence of a single lithium polysulfide phase. The activation barrier can disappear by adding lithium polysulfides into the liquid electrolyte, further demonstrating the activation barrier arising from the nucleation of polysulfide. During the first discharge process, a short plateau at 2.3 V and a long plateau at 2.1 V can be observed, corresponding to the reaction of S with Li to form long-chain lithium polysulfide (Li2Sn, 4 ≤ n ≤ 8) and the reaction of lithium polysulfide with Li to form insoluble lithium sulfide (Li2Sn, 1 ≤ n ≤ 2), consistent with the sulfur cathode. In the following cycles, the activation barrier disappeared and the voltage profile is the same with the sulfur electrodes. The delithiation and lithiation behaviors of Li2S can be seen in the cyclic voltammetry (Figure 1(b)) [9].The activation barrier is associated with the particle size of Li2S. Liang et al. decreased the particle size of Li2S from 10–20 μm to ∼1 μm through a facile ball milling process. The interfacial and charge transfer resistance of Li2S was decreased after ball milling and carbon-coating treatment, and the initial activation potential was reduced from 3.38 to 2.99 V [10]. Higher voltage is required to extract the lithium ion from the interior of Li2S with large particles due to the long lithium-ion diffusion distance and slow charge transfer. Small particles can not only shorten the diffusion distance of lithium ions but also accelerate the charge transfer and chemical reactions by increasing the contact areas with the electrolyte. Figure 2 shows the CV curves of Li2S with three particle sizes. Combined with SEM images and CV curves, it can be concluded that the activation potential of Li2S decreases with the particle sizes (Figure 2) [11]. A native layer effect as another important potential factor was proposed to explain the activation of Li2S [12]. Li2S is sensitive to moisture and air to generate H2S and a stable LiOH layer accompanied by an unstable S-H layer. These unique layers result in low lithium-ion diffusivity and severe capacity fading, which can be removed by two typical methods of high-temperature annealing and mechanical ball milling of Li2S [12, 13].Figure 2
SEM images of (a–c) Li2S particles in different sizes and (d–f) Li2S@C particles in different sizes. (g–i) The corresponding CV curves [11].Another avenue to reduce the activation potential is to add facilitating additives such as polysulfides and redox mediators. The added polysulfides are thought to contribute to the phase nucleation of polysulfides in the Li2S cathode during the initial charge process. Xu et al. added a small amount of polysulfides into DME to form a Li2Sx-based electrolyte. When contacted with the long-chain Li2Sx, Li2S can spontaneously oxidize to low-order Li2Sx which significantly reduces the energy required for the nucleation of polysulfides. As a result, the activation barrier during the initial charge process was likely eliminated [14]. Redox mediators (RMs) can enhance the electron transfer in the Li2S cathode by the following steps: (1) RMs are electrooxidated at the electrode surface; (2) the oxidated redox mediators (RM+) diffuse deeper into the Li2S cathode materials; (3) the inner Li2S is oxidated by the RM+; and (4) RMs diffuse back to the electrode surface to be recycled. The activation potential of the Li2S cathode can thus be reduced for the enhanced charge transfer. Meini et al. used three kinds of RMs with different oxidation potential for testing: ERM < ELi2S (cobaltocene), ERM≈ELi2S (dibenzenechromium), and ERM > ELi2S (decamethylferrocene, LiI, and ferrocene), and found that only the RMs whose oxidation potential is higher than that of Li2S can work effectively. The activation potential of the Li2S cathode during the initial charge was reduced to ∼2.75 V by using decamethylferrocene as the RM [15]. These results provide new ideas for reducing the activation barrier of Li2S.


## 3. Improvement of Lithium Storage Performance of the Li2S Cathode in Half Cells

Li2S suffers from low electronic and ionic conductivity, high activation barrier, and the shuttle of lithium polysulfides, resulting in the poor electrochemical performance. In this section, we focus on the strategies for improving electrochemical properties of Li2S cathode materials. Table 1 lists the electrochemical performance of various lithium sulfide cathodes for lithium-sulfur batteries. The electrochemical performance of Li2S composites is found to strongly depend on the modified materials and mass loading of Li2S.Table 1
Electrochemical performance of various lithium sulfide-based cathodes for lithium-sulfur batteries.
Cell type
Modified material
Cathode material
Current density
Capacity (mA·g−1)@cycle number
Voltage (V)
Li2S content (wt. %)
Mass loading
Ref.
Half cell
Metal
Li2S-Fe
—
600@1
0–3
62.2
—
[16]
Metal
Li2S-Cu
64 μA·cm−2
300@30
0–3
68.4
—
[17]
Carbon materials
Li2S-C nanocomposites
116.6 mA·g−1
411@50
1.5–2.8
67.5
0.794 mg·cm−2
[18]
Carbon materials
Li2S/C composites
583 mA·g−1
652@100
1.6–3.4
72
1.0 mg·cm−2
[19]
Carbon materials
Li2S-C-PVP
116.6 mA·g−1
420@50
1.5–3.0
60
1.5 mg·cm−2 (Li2S)
[20]
Carbon materials
Li2S/C
233.2 mA·g−1
305@92
0.2–4.6
50
—
[21]
Carbon materials
Li2S@C-Co-N composites
233.2 mA·g−1
929.6@300
1.5–3.0
52
2.0 mg·cm−2 (Li2S)
[22]
Carbon materials
3D CNT/graphene-Li2S
233.2 mA·g−1
958.3@300
1.5–3.0
81.4
4.0 mg·cm−2 (Li2S)
[23]
Carbon materials
Nano-Li2S/rGO paper
1166 mA·g−1
617.6@145
1.7–2.8
50–60
0.8–1.5 mg·cm−2 (Li2S)
[24]
Carbon materials
Li2S-graphene composites
116.6 mA·g−1
510@100
1.5–3.5
82
1.0 mg·cm−2
[25]
Carbon materials
Li2S/N-doped graphene
583 mA·g−1
403@300
1.7–2.8
50–55
2.0 mg·cm−2 (Li2S)
[26]
Carbon materials
Li2S@Ni-P-S@graphene
583 mA·g−1
540@300
1.5–2.8
60.6
2.0 mg·cm−2 (Li2S)
[27]
Carbon materials
Li2S-rGO nanocomposites
116.6 mA·g−1
315@100
1.6–3.5
66
0.96 mg·cm−2 (Li2S)
[28]
Carbon materials
Li2S-porous carbon black composites
167.2 mA·g−1
578@100
1.8–2.6
71
2.0 mg·cm−2 (Li2S)
[29]
Carbon materials
Highly nitridated graphene-Li2S composites
233.2 mA·g−1
480@500
1.7–2.8
66.3
1.2 mg·cm−2 (Li2S)
[30]
Carbon materials
Li2S/C hybrids
116.6 mA·g−1
570@200
1.0–3.0
74
3–3.5 mg·cm−2 (Li2S)
[31]
Carbon materials
Li2S@C
116.6 mA·g−1
800@15
1.2–3.0
51.3
1.0 mg·cm−2 (Li2S)
[32]
Carbon materials
Li2S-C nanocomposites
1166 mA·g−1
648.5@50
1.2–3.5
90
2.5–3 mg·cm−2
[33]
Carbon materials
Hierarchical C-Li2S-C nanocomposites
583 mA g−1
910@100
1.2–2.8
60
1.0 mg·cm−2 (Li2S)
[34]
Carbon materials
Nano-Li2S@C
233.2 mA·g−1
766.4@200
1.7–2.8
72.3
2.8 mg·cm−2
[35]
Carbon materials
3D-rGO-Li2S@C
116.6 mA·g−1
563@100
1.6–2.8
75
2.5–3.5 mg·cm−2
[36]
Carbon materials
Carbon felt-carbon black-Li2S@C
1166 mA·g−1
567.5@200
1.7–2.8
—
7 mg·cm−2
[37]
Carbon materials
Thermally exfoliated graphene-Li2S
116.6 mA·g−1
791@100
1.2–2.5
53
1.3 mg·cm−2
[38]
Carbon materials
Li2S@graphene
160 mA·g−1
600@200
1.4–3.0
88
10.0 mg·cm−2
[39]
Carbon materials
Li2S@C
2 mA·cm−2
644@700
0.9–2.4
38
7.0 mg·cm−2 (Li2S)
[40]
Carbon materials
Li2S@PC-CNT
500 mA·g−1
502@300
1.8–2.85
68.2
1.3 mg·cm−2
[41]
Carbon materials
Li2S/graphene composites
97.2 mA·g−1
508@40
1.5–3.5
78.3
0.5 mg·cm−2
[42]
Carbon materials
Li2S@PC
1166 mA·g−1
252@200
1.5–3.0
70
2.4 mg·cm−2
[43]
Carbon materials
Li2S@C composites
1166 mA·g−1
493.2@300
1.7–2.8
68
—
[44]
Carbon materials
3D-rGO-Li2S/C composites
1166 mA·g−1
415@100
1.5–3.0
40
0.8–1.0 mg·cm−2 (Li2S)
[45]
Carbon materials
Carbon paper supported Li2S@C
116.6 mA·g−1
430@100
1.7–2.8
36
2.0 mg·cm−2
[46]
Carbon materials
Li2S@N-doped carbon nanofibers
1166 mA·g−1
338@200
1.7–2.8
50.6
9.0 mg·cm−2 (Li2S)
[47]
Carbon materials
Li2S/N,P-C composites
583 mA·g−1
520@100
1.7–3.0
62
2.0 mg·cm−2
[48]
Carbon and oxide
Li2S/TiO2-hollow carbon nanofibers
2332g−1
366.4@340
1.2–3.0
67
—
[49]
Carbon and oxide
Al2O3-Li2S-graphene oxide sponge
233.2 mA·g−1
736@150
1.8–2.6
58
1.2–1.5 mg·cm−2 (Li2S)
[50]
Carbide
Ti3C2/Li2S
233.2 mA·g−1
440@100
1.8–2.8
60
0.8 mg·cm−2 (Li2S)
[51]
Sulfide
Li2S@TiS2
583 mA·g−1
666@400
1.8–2.6
51
1.0 mg·cm−2(Li2S)
[52]
Organics
Li2S-polypyrrole composites
233.2 mA·g−1
573@400
1.8–2.6
86
1.0 mg·cm−2 (Li2S)
[53]
Full cell
Carbon materials
Li2S-mesophase carbon microbeads
232 mA·g−1
280@50
0.1–2.75
50
—
[54]
Carbon materials
Li2S/mesoporous carbon nanocomposites
389 mA·g−1
234@20
1.2–2.6
58.9
1.1–1.4 mg·cm−2 (Li2S)
[55]
Carbon materials
Li2S/graphite
97.2 mA·g−1
410@100
0.5–3.5
80.6
2.2 mg·cm−2 (Li2S)
[56]
Carbon materials
Li2S-rGO
232 mA·g−1
472@150
0.2–2.6
55
1.0–1.2 mg·cm−2 (Li2S)
[57]


### 3.1. Li2S-Metal Composites

Transition metal sulfides (FeS2, CuS, CoS2, etc.) have been widely used as the cathode materials in Li-S batteries. After lithiation, the transition metal sulfides finally convert into a mixture of transition metal and Li2S, in which the transition metal is uniformly dispersed in the Li2S. The electronic conductivity of Li2S is increased by the uniformly dispersed transition metal. Dahn et al. directly mixed the transition metal and Li2S by ball milling and demonstrated that the Li2S-M (M=Co, Fe) nanocomposite with average grain sizes of ∼10 nm is electrochemically active. The Li2S-Fe cathodes displayed a high reversible capacity of 600 mAh·g−1 [16]. Pure Li2S is difficult to work in all-solid-state batteries as the cathode material for its insulative nature. The addition of highly conductive metallic materials can effectively improve the electronic conductivity. Tatsumisago et al. used a mechanical milling synthesis to prepare Li2S-Cu active materials with various molar ratios [17]. Li2S did not react with Cu during the mechanical milling (Figure 3(a)). The conductivity improved by the addition of Cu successfully allowed the insulative Li2S being rechargeable in the all-solid-state batteries. As shown in Figure 3(b), the 75Li2S·25Cu electrode not only delivers a high capacity (∼300 mAh·g−1 after 30 cycles) but also exhibits a high coulombic efficiency (∼97% at the 30th cycle).Figure 3
(a) XRD patterns of the mechanical-milled Li2S-Cu powders. (b) Cycling performance of the all-solid-state cell using the 75Li2S·25Cu electrode [17].
(a)
(b)Li2S-metal composites exhibit higher electronic conductivity and better electrochemical performance compared with pure Li2S. However, the limitations of Li2S-metal electrodes are gradually revealed. Firstly, transition metals usually used in Li2S-metal electrodes cause the low energy density of cells due to the high density of transition metals. Secondly, the irreversible reactions between metals and intermediate products from the charge/discharge process of Li2S result in the loss of active materials and the capacity fading. Thirdly, a serious electrochemical polarization is accompanied by the charge-discharge process of the Li2S-metal electrode, which is associated with its rate performance. More attentions have been focused on other Li2S-based composites (such as Li2S-carbon, Li2S-conducting polymer, and Li2S-sulfide) because of the unsatisfactory electrochemical performance of Li2S-metal.


### 3.2. Li2S-Carbon Composites

Carbon materials with rich structural diversity, stable chemical properties, high conductivity, abundant reserve, and low density are considered one of the most promising materials used in the energy storage field (such as hydrogen storage, lithium-ion battery, and supercapacitor). As the typical representatives of carbon materials, activated carbon, carbon nanotubes, graphene, and porous carbon have been widely used in the Li2S electrode with excellent electrochemical performance. The carbon materials can contribute to the electronic conductivity and prevent the diffusion of lithium polysulfides. According to the combination mode of Li2S with carbon, we can divide it into four main methods: (1) physical mixing: the Li2S-carbon mixtures were obtained by the most straightforward method of mechanical milling; (2) diffusion and precipitation: in the liquid state, Li2S can be easily diffused into the interior of carbon materials and reserved inside by the following evaporation process; (3) pyrolysis and carbon coating: the pyrolysis reaction of organics under high-temperature and anaerobic conditions is utilized to prepare carbon layer-coated Li2S-carbon composites; and (4) in situ reaction. Different from aforementioned methods, there is no readymade carbon or Li2S and the Li2S-carbon composites are in situ synthesized by one-pot reaction of a mixture of lithium sources, sulfur sources, and carbon sources.


#### 3.2.1. Physical Mixing

Physical mixing of Li2S and carbon is regarded as the simplest and most direct method to obtain Li2S-carbon mixtures. Cai et al. reported a typical physical mixing method for preparing the nanostructured Li2S-carbon composite by high-energy ball milling (Figure 4(a)) [18]. After ball milling, the size of Li2S particles reduced from about 20 μm to about 400 nm (∼50 times), and the carbon black is uniformly dispersed on the Li2S surface, as illustrated in Figure 4(a). The morphologies of commercial Li2S and ball-milled Li2S-carbon composite can be observed by scanning electron microscopy (Figures 4(b) and 4(c)). The reduced size of Li2S and uniform dispersion of conductive carbon on the Li2S surface can effectively reduce the lithium-ion transmission distance and increase electronic conductivity, leading to the good electrochemical performance of Li2S-carbon.Figure 4
(a) Schematic of the ball milling process. SEM images of (b) commercial Li2S powder and (c) ball-milled Li2S-carbon composite [18]. (d) Synthetic schematic of the Li2S-plus-C composite [19].In addition to the mixing function, mechanical ball milling is also widely used to reduce the Li2S particle size for further processing [10, 19–21]. For example, Chen et al. used high-energy ball milling to obtain the precursor of Li2S-plus-C composites (Figure 4(d)), which showed a smaller particle size and higher electrochemical activity [19]. It should be noted that the physical mixing is difficult to obtain a composite of which Li2S enters the interior of carbon materials, and the naked Li2S suffers from the serious shuttle effect of lithium polysulfides.


#### 3.2.2. Diffusion and Precipitation

Li2S has good solubility in solvents such as ethanol and tetrahydrofuran. As a result, a simple liquid infiltration-evaporation method was widely used to synthesize the Li2S-carbon composite [22–27]. The synthesis process mainly includes three steps: (1) the preparation of the Li2S solution; (2) the infiltration; and (3) the evaporation of the solvent and nucleation of Li2S. This method requires a high specific surface area and porosity of the carbon material (e.g., graphene, carbon nanotube, and porous carbon) to get a higher Li2S content and better dispersion of Li2S in the composite. The synthetic schematic of the Li2S-carbon composite using different carbon materials is displayed in Figure 5 [22–24]. Li2S solution was usually slowly added into the carbon materials until the solvents had visibly evaporated to ensure rapid nucleation of Li2S with a small size [26, 27]. Zhou et al. successfully synthesized a freestanding Li2S-coated graphene cathode through the above method. It showed a reduced initial charge voltage barrier and a high capacity of 403 mAh·g−1 after 300 cycles at 0.5°C. The cross-linked, porous network structure provides not only the homogeneously dispersed nucleation sites but also the fast electron/ion transfer channels.Figure 5
Synthetic schematic of the Li2S-carbon composite based on different carbon materials: (a) ZIF-67; (b) CNT; (c) rGO paper; (d) GO-CNT suspension [22–24].
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Li2S can also be synthesized by a solution-based chemical infiltration method through the following disproportionation reaction of Li2S6 [28, 29, 58]:(5)Li2S6⟶Li2S+58⋅S8The chemical infiltration method is similar to the liquid infiltration-evaporation method. Li2S6 solution is prepared firstly and then absorbed by the carbon materials. During the evaporation process of the solvent, the disproportionation reaction occurred, Li2S and sulfur were formed inside carbon, and extra sulfur was removed by a heat treatment. Strubel et al. reported that the as-prepared Li2S showed a smaller size and higher initial discharge capacity with better cycle stability compared with Li2S prepared by an ethanol-based liquid infiltration-evaporation method [29]. Li2S3 solution is also used to synthesize such a kind of Li2S-carbon composite instead of Li2S6 solution [30].In addition, it is noteworthy that the lithium-triggered chemical reduction is also an effective method to prepare the Li2S-carbon composite. The Li2S6 solution was dropped to the lithiated graphite paper and then assembled into a cell with the lithium metal. The open-circuit voltage of the cell linearly increased from 60 mV to 2.12 V, indicating that Li2S6 was slowly in situ converted to Li2S by the following reaction:(6)Li2S6+10Li+⟶6Li2SOnly 48.4% Li2S6 converted to Li2S because of the insoluble Li2S and Li2S2 formed on the surface of graphite, blocking the pathway for the further reduction reaction [59]. Zheng et al. infiltrated sulfur into the microporous carbon at first and then adopted a similar chemical reduction method to convert the elemental sulfur in porous carbon into Li2S using the lithium metal [60]. Li2S can easily enter the interior of the carbon materials owing to the fluidity of the liquid but still suffers from the polysulfide shuttle for the exposure to the liquid electrolyte.


#### 3.2.3. Pyrolysis and Carbon Coating

Carbon layer coating is an effective strategy to reduce direct contact between the electrolyte and Li2S, and to block the shuttle of lithium polysulfides. It is the most common method to prepare carbon-coated Li2S by utilizing the pyrolysis reaction of organics. Liang et al. dispersed the ball-milled commercial Li2S in the polystyrene solution and obtained the uniform size (∼1 μm) carbon-coated Li2S particles followed by a pyrolysis process. The formed carbon layer not only helped confining the lithium polysulfides but also prevented the Li2S particles from agglomerating. The as-prepared Li2S-C composites showed excellent cycling stability with an average decay rate of 0.18% per cycle over 200 cycles [10]. More complicate carbon-coating structures were designed to improve the electrochemical performance of Li2S [31–35]. Wu et al. prepared a hierarchical particle-shell architecture Li2S-C composite (Figure 6) with remarkable long-term cycling performance. In this case, nanosized Li2S particles were embedded into the conductive carbon matrix and then coated by a graphitic outer shell through a CVD method. The hierarchical particle-shell architecture can obviously reduce the internal stresses within outer shells caused by the volume changes during the charge/discharge process and enhance the mechanical stability of the composite. The multilevel protection for Li2S effectively mitigated polysulfide dissolution and achieved excellent cycling performance (∼700 mAh·g−1 after 600 cycles at 0.5°C) [34].Figure 6
Schematic and TEM images of the hierarchical particle-shell architecture Li2S-C composite [34].However, the excessive use of carbon can seriously affect the specific capacity of composite materials. To prepare a dense and effective carbon layer for Li2S particles is the goal for many researchers. Suo et al. successfully prepared a nanoscale carbon cage for Li2S clusters through the two steps of polymerization (350°C) and carbonization (600°C) processes. During the polymerization stage, the agglomerated Li2S particles were departed into Li2S clusters for the shrink of [Emim]-[N(CN)2]. The dense outer carbon layer (∼5 nm) was then formed during the carbonization stage. The as-prepared carbon-coated Li2S clusters also exhibited a high initial capacity of 826 mAh·g−1 at 0.1°C and an excellent capacity retention of 82% after 500 cycles at 1°C [33].Based on the advantages mentioned above and its simple processing, the pyrolysis carbon layer-coating method is also widely used to enhance the physical protection for Li2S in other Li2S-carbon composites as an auxiliary measure. For example, the Li2S-3D porous carbon composites prepared by a liquid infiltration-evaporation method are often followed by a coating treatment for the exposed Li2S [36, 37, 61]. Tu et al. successfully prepared a 3D reduced graphene oxide material embedding carbon-coated Li2S particles through a one-step liquid solution-evaporation-carbonization method. The electrochemical performance of the above Li2S-carbon composite is much better than that of the 3D-rGO-Li2S composite without carbon coating [36].


#### 3.2.4. In Situ Reaction

In fact, both mechanical milling and a liquid solution-evaporation method are merely physically mixing Li2S and carbon materials. The poor physical contact between Li2S and carbon materials, as well as the high cost of commercial Li2S particles, is still limiting the practical applications of the Li2S-carbon composites. In recent years, facile synthesis methods of Li2S particles have been developed based on the reduction of sulfur using various reducing agents (LiH, LiEt3BH, etc.). The as-prepared Li2S particles show good electrochemical performance with ultrasmall size (∼8.5 nm) [38]. But a further carbon mixing treatment is still needed to enhance the electronic conductivity. In situ synthesis of the Li2S-carbon composite is a promising new avenue to be developed.Just like the combustion reaction of metallic magnesium in carbon dioxide, metallic lithium can also be burned in carbon disulfide vapor. Li2S/carbon can be obtained by the following reaction:(7)4Lil+CS2g⟶2Li2Ss+CsIt is seen that Li2S and carbon, as the only two products of the combustion reaction of the Li metal with CS2, combined to be a composite just like a “combination reaction” [39, 40]. Tan et al. prepared Li2S particles wrapped by few-layer graphene (10∼20 layers) with a capsule-like nanostructure using the above method. The single-crystalline Li2S core was completely coated by the graphene, and the active mass loading is achieved to be ∼10 mg·cm–2. In the first charging, the composite exhibits 1600 mAh·g−1 (specific capacity of sulfur) with a coulombic efficiency of 72.5%. A reversible capacity >600 mAh·g−1 and a high areal capacity >4.2 mAh·cm−2 remained after 200 cycles [39]. Though the above “combination reaction” has 100% utilization of raw materials in theory, the reaction temperature above 600°C is too high. Liang et al. used LiH instead of the lithium metal as the reducing agent:(8)4LiHs+CS2g⟶2Li2Ss+Cs+2H2gThe reaction temperature was lowered below 250°C and the reaction time was as short as 5 seconds, which are the lowest reaction temperature and the shortest reaction time reported to date for the in situ synthesis of Li2S-carbon composites, as shown in Figure 7 [41].Figure 7
Time-temperature curves of (a) Li2S@PC-CNT and (b) Li2S@PC during the synthesis processes [41].
(a)
(b)Li2SO4 can be reduced by carbon to directly synthesize Li2S-carbon materials through the following reaction [62]:(9)Li2SO4+xC⟶Li2S+xCOyx=1−4;y=1−2Such a facile, cost-effective method has attracted the attention of many researchers [42–48, 62–64]. Through the above method, Li2S can be combined with carbon in various structures by dispersing Li2SO4 in different carbon matrixes. Wang et al. fabricated the nanosized Li2S embedded into porous carbon composites through a one-pot carbonization-reduction method, as shown in Figure 8. The glucose and Li2SO4 mixture was first heated to 600°C for the carbonization, and the Li2SO4 particles were homogeneously distributed in the carbon matrix without turning into Li2S. Then, the temperature went up to 800°C, and Li2SO4 totally converted into Li2S. It is believed that the glucose carbonization can effectively inhibit the growth or aggregation of nano-Li2SO4, which is the key to form homogeneously distributed Li2S-porous carbon composites [43]. More novel structures, such as one-dimensional fibers, two-dimensional sandwich plates, and three-dimensional networks, were also synthesized through the similar method [42, 46, 47].Figure 8
Schematic of the synthesis of Li2S@PC composites [43].The Li2S-carbon composites exhibit a broad application prospect in lithium ions batteries because more and more advanced preparation technologies will be developed. The most Li2S-carbon study focused on the construction of a stable material structure, simple synthesis method, and high active material loading and utilization, but the weak affinity toward polar Li2S and polysulfides for the nonpolar nature of carbon has still not been fundamentally resolved [65]. It is believed that the study of compounds of Li2S-other materials with strong binding is necessary to figure out better solutions for both high capacity and rate performance.


### 3.3. Compound of Li2S with Polar Chemical Binding

Many materials with polar functional groups such as metal oxide, metal sulfide, and polymer materials have been applied in the Li2S compounding [49, 50]. Chen et al. coated ultrathin Al2O3 layers (∼1 nm) onto the Li2S-graphene oxide sponge by an atomic layer deposition (ALD) technique. The three-dimensional graphene oxide contributes high electronic conductivity to the composites, and the Al2O3 layers effectively suppress the dissolution of lithium polysulfides through the strong binding between Al2O3 layers and Li2Sx. As a result, long-term cycling stability (high capacity retention of 88% after 300 cycles at 0.5°C) and high rate performance were achieved simultaneously [50]. LiTiO2 is believed to exhibit a strong binding to the lithium polysulfides and to induce the conversion of long polysulfides into short polysulfides, which have lower solubility in electrolytes. LiTiO2 can be synthesized by the following reaction at 650°C:(10)TiO2+Li2S⟶2LiTiO2+S↑gWhen the TiO2 particles and Li2S were simultaneously dissolved in anhydrous ethanol, the formed LiTiO2 particles were uniformly distributed within the Li2S agglomerates. The as-synthesized product showed unsatisfactory electrochemical performance. Wu et al. adjusted the preparation using titanium isopropoxide as the liquid titanium source instead of TiO2 particles. In such a solution situation, the Li2S nanoparticles got nucleated first due to the lower solubility in ethanol during the early stage of solution evaporation and immediately got wrapped by Ti species in the further evaporation, forming a core-shell structure and reducing agglomeration. The LiTiO2-coated Li2S particles ranging from 100 to 200 nm showed remarkable cycling stability and good rate performance. In addition, the formation of Ti–S bonding is proved to be beneficial for the conversion reaction of Li2S into polysulfides by lowering the activation barrier. Compared with commonly used graphene, a multilayered Ti3C3 material fabricated by Liang et al. exhibited better chemical absorption of polysulfides as the Li2S host, and the activation barrier of the Ti3C2-Li2S composite cathode decreased to 2.85 V, a 0.6 V potential lower than that of the graphene/Li2S composite cathode [51].Metal sulfide is another popular material used in the Li2S composite for its sulfur composition and strong chemical interaction toward lithium polysulfides. He et al. used the metal sulfide (TS, TS=NiS, CoS, MnS) to decorate the carbon sponge. The uniformly dispersed polar 0D metal sulfide nanodots accelerate the Li-S redox reaction and absorb the lithium polysulfides through the strong binding. The 1D carbon nanowires cross-linked with 2D graphene nanosheets avoid aggregation and construct a 3D porous and conductive network, which not only facilitate the electronic and ionic conduction but also provide enough space for hosting Li2S (Figure 9). Among the above metal sulfides, CoS has the highest electrocatalytic effect and exhibits an outstanding electrochemical performance with a high areal capacity of 8.44 mAh·cm−2 [66].Figure 9
(a) Schematic of the synthesis of the 3DTSC. (b) Schematic of the function mechanism of metal sulfides [66].
(a)
(b)Cui’s group coated the Li2S particles with a TiS2 shell (∼20 nm) using a chemical reaction method:(11)TiCl4+2Li2S⟶TiS2+4LiClAs calculated, the binding energy between Li2S and TiS2 is 10 times higher than that of Li2S with carbon-based graphene. Due to the high electronic conductivity of TiS2, the electronic conductivity of the Li2S-TiS2 composite is 10 times higher than that of the pure Li2S. The Li2S-TiS2 composite delivered stable specific capacities (700, 650, 608, 595, and 560 mAh·g−1) at different C rates (0.2°C, 0.5°C, 1°C, 2°C, and 3°C). Other transition metal disulfides such as ZrS2 and VS2 were also investigated using the same reaction mechanism:(12)MCl4+2Li2S⟶MS2+4LiClM=Ti,Zr, and VThe calculated binding energies of ZrS2 and VS2 with Li2S are 2.70 and 2.94 eV, respectively, which are 9-10 times higher than that of Li2S with carbon-based graphene [52].The conducting polymer is believed to be the ideal material for the Li2S composites because of its high electronic conductivity, soft nature, and sufficient polar function groups [53, 67–69]. Polypyrrole has been the most popular conductive polymer in recent years. When coupled to Li2S in a Li/S or lithium-ion battery, the N atoms in polypyrrole can interact strongly with Li2S, leading to a uniform and complete coating of Li2S by polypyrrole with strong adhesion. The core-shell structure and Li-N interaction between the polypyrrole and lithium polysulfides effectively avoid the polysulfide species dissolution into the electrolyte, enabling the Li2S-polypyrrole cathode to maintain a stable capacity performance of 785 mAh·g−1 after 400 cycles [53].Besides the design of active Li2S composites, binder and electrolyte modification is another avenue to avoid the polysulfide dissolution. There are various functional groups in the polymer binders. Seh et al. selected poly(vinylpyrrolidone) as the optimal binder for the Li2S cathode based on the binding energies between the functional groups and lithium polysulfides calculated by ab initio simulations. The high binding energy of >C=O groups in PVP with Li2S and lithium polysulfides results in a uniform dispersion of the active material and carbon in the electrode slurry and inhibition of polysulfide dissolution [70]. However, the strong binding between PVP and Li2S will cause a boosted initial potential barrier for the inhibition of lithium-ion diffusion. According to Liu’s results, this could be alleviated by using a PVP and polyethylene oxide (PEO) mixed binder for the excellent ionic conductivity of PEO [20]. Wang et al. adopted a two-phase organic electrolyte system: the cathode electrolyte (carbonate) and anode electrolyte (ether) were separated by an ion-conducting glass ceramic separator. The polysulfides could be well constrained on the cathode side without shuttling [71].To achieve the full theoretical capacity of 1167 mAh·g−1, a high initial charge potential of 4.0 VLi for the Li2S cathode is needed. However, the commonly used ether-based electrolyte solutions are unstable at such a high potential [72]. A lower cutoff of 3.6 VLi is usually employed for the stable running of Li-S batteries despite a lower utilization of Li2S. Additions of redox mediators (decamethylferrocene, LiI, and ferrocene) [15], P2S5 [73], and lithium polysulfides [14] for the electrolyte were reported to be effective in enhancing the Li2S utilization. Redox mediators can be electrooxidized on the electrode surface and diffuse into the interior to oxidize the inactive Li2S. The Li2S cathode can thus be completely activated by the above reversible redox reactions at a low initial charge potential. The initial charge shows a flat potential plateau implying the proceeding of the reversible redox reactions [71]. A similar behavior can be seen while adding P2S5 into the electrolyte, and intermediate sulfur- and phosphorus-containing species will be formed on the L2S surface, which can assist the surface charge transfer [73].


## 3.1. Li2S-Metal Composites

Transition metal sulfides (FeS2, CuS, CoS2, etc.) have been widely used as the cathode materials in Li-S batteries. After lithiation, the transition metal sulfides finally convert into a mixture of transition metal and Li2S, in which the transition metal is uniformly dispersed in the Li2S. The electronic conductivity of Li2S is increased by the uniformly dispersed transition metal. Dahn et al. directly mixed the transition metal and Li2S by ball milling and demonstrated that the Li2S-M (M=Co, Fe) nanocomposite with average grain sizes of ∼10 nm is electrochemically active. The Li2S-Fe cathodes displayed a high reversible capacity of 600 mAh·g−1 [16]. Pure Li2S is difficult to work in all-solid-state batteries as the cathode material for its insulative nature. The addition of highly conductive metallic materials can effectively improve the electronic conductivity. Tatsumisago et al. used a mechanical milling synthesis to prepare Li2S-Cu active materials with various molar ratios [17]. Li2S did not react with Cu during the mechanical milling (Figure 3(a)). The conductivity improved by the addition of Cu successfully allowed the insulative Li2S being rechargeable in the all-solid-state batteries. As shown in Figure 3(b), the 75Li2S·25Cu electrode not only delivers a high capacity (∼300 mAh·g−1 after 30 cycles) but also exhibits a high coulombic efficiency (∼97% at the 30th cycle).Figure 3
(a) XRD patterns of the mechanical-milled Li2S-Cu powders. (b) Cycling performance of the all-solid-state cell using the 75Li2S·25Cu electrode [17].
(a)
(b)Li2S-metal composites exhibit higher electronic conductivity and better electrochemical performance compared with pure Li2S. However, the limitations of Li2S-metal electrodes are gradually revealed. Firstly, transition metals usually used in Li2S-metal electrodes cause the low energy density of cells due to the high density of transition metals. Secondly, the irreversible reactions between metals and intermediate products from the charge/discharge process of Li2S result in the loss of active materials and the capacity fading. Thirdly, a serious electrochemical polarization is accompanied by the charge-discharge process of the Li2S-metal electrode, which is associated with its rate performance. More attentions have been focused on other Li2S-based composites (such as Li2S-carbon, Li2S-conducting polymer, and Li2S-sulfide) because of the unsatisfactory electrochemical performance of Li2S-metal.


## 3.2. Li2S-Carbon Composites

Carbon materials with rich structural diversity, stable chemical properties, high conductivity, abundant reserve, and low density are considered one of the most promising materials used in the energy storage field (such as hydrogen storage, lithium-ion battery, and supercapacitor). As the typical representatives of carbon materials, activated carbon, carbon nanotubes, graphene, and porous carbon have been widely used in the Li2S electrode with excellent electrochemical performance. The carbon materials can contribute to the electronic conductivity and prevent the diffusion of lithium polysulfides. According to the combination mode of Li2S with carbon, we can divide it into four main methods: (1) physical mixing: the Li2S-carbon mixtures were obtained by the most straightforward method of mechanical milling; (2) diffusion and precipitation: in the liquid state, Li2S can be easily diffused into the interior of carbon materials and reserved inside by the following evaporation process; (3) pyrolysis and carbon coating: the pyrolysis reaction of organics under high-temperature and anaerobic conditions is utilized to prepare carbon layer-coated Li2S-carbon composites; and (4) in situ reaction. Different from aforementioned methods, there is no readymade carbon or Li2S and the Li2S-carbon composites are in situ synthesized by one-pot reaction of a mixture of lithium sources, sulfur sources, and carbon sources.


### 3.2.1. Physical Mixing

Physical mixing of Li2S and carbon is regarded as the simplest and most direct method to obtain Li2S-carbon mixtures. Cai et al. reported a typical physical mixing method for preparing the nanostructured Li2S-carbon composite by high-energy ball milling (Figure 4(a)) [18]. After ball milling, the size of Li2S particles reduced from about 20 μm to about 400 nm (∼50 times), and the carbon black is uniformly dispersed on the Li2S surface, as illustrated in Figure 4(a). The morphologies of commercial Li2S and ball-milled Li2S-carbon composite can be observed by scanning electron microscopy (Figures 4(b) and 4(c)). The reduced size of Li2S and uniform dispersion of conductive carbon on the Li2S surface can effectively reduce the lithium-ion transmission distance and increase electronic conductivity, leading to the good electrochemical performance of Li2S-carbon.Figure 4
(a) Schematic of the ball milling process. SEM images of (b) commercial Li2S powder and (c) ball-milled Li2S-carbon composite [18]. (d) Synthetic schematic of the Li2S-plus-C composite [19].In addition to the mixing function, mechanical ball milling is also widely used to reduce the Li2S particle size for further processing [10, 19–21]. For example, Chen et al. used high-energy ball milling to obtain the precursor of Li2S-plus-C composites (Figure 4(d)), which showed a smaller particle size and higher electrochemical activity [19]. It should be noted that the physical mixing is difficult to obtain a composite of which Li2S enters the interior of carbon materials, and the naked Li2S suffers from the serious shuttle effect of lithium polysulfides.


### 3.2.2. Diffusion and Precipitation

Li2S has good solubility in solvents such as ethanol and tetrahydrofuran. As a result, a simple liquid infiltration-evaporation method was widely used to synthesize the Li2S-carbon composite [22–27]. The synthesis process mainly includes three steps: (1) the preparation of the Li2S solution; (2) the infiltration; and (3) the evaporation of the solvent and nucleation of Li2S. This method requires a high specific surface area and porosity of the carbon material (e.g., graphene, carbon nanotube, and porous carbon) to get a higher Li2S content and better dispersion of Li2S in the composite. The synthetic schematic of the Li2S-carbon composite using different carbon materials is displayed in Figure 5 [22–24]. Li2S solution was usually slowly added into the carbon materials until the solvents had visibly evaporated to ensure rapid nucleation of Li2S with a small size [26, 27]. Zhou et al. successfully synthesized a freestanding Li2S-coated graphene cathode through the above method. It showed a reduced initial charge voltage barrier and a high capacity of 403 mAh·g−1 after 300 cycles at 0.5°C. The cross-linked, porous network structure provides not only the homogeneously dispersed nucleation sites but also the fast electron/ion transfer channels.Figure 5
Synthetic schematic of the Li2S-carbon composite based on different carbon materials: (a) ZIF-67; (b) CNT; (c) rGO paper; (d) GO-CNT suspension [22–24].
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Li2S can also be synthesized by a solution-based chemical infiltration method through the following disproportionation reaction of Li2S6 [28, 29, 58]:(5)Li2S6⟶Li2S+58⋅S8The chemical infiltration method is similar to the liquid infiltration-evaporation method. Li2S6 solution is prepared firstly and then absorbed by the carbon materials. During the evaporation process of the solvent, the disproportionation reaction occurred, Li2S and sulfur were formed inside carbon, and extra sulfur was removed by a heat treatment. Strubel et al. reported that the as-prepared Li2S showed a smaller size and higher initial discharge capacity with better cycle stability compared with Li2S prepared by an ethanol-based liquid infiltration-evaporation method [29]. Li2S3 solution is also used to synthesize such a kind of Li2S-carbon composite instead of Li2S6 solution [30].In addition, it is noteworthy that the lithium-triggered chemical reduction is also an effective method to prepare the Li2S-carbon composite. The Li2S6 solution was dropped to the lithiated graphite paper and then assembled into a cell with the lithium metal. The open-circuit voltage of the cell linearly increased from 60 mV to 2.12 V, indicating that Li2S6 was slowly in situ converted to Li2S by the following reaction:(6)Li2S6+10Li+⟶6Li2SOnly 48.4% Li2S6 converted to Li2S because of the insoluble Li2S and Li2S2 formed on the surface of graphite, blocking the pathway for the further reduction reaction [59]. Zheng et al. infiltrated sulfur into the microporous carbon at first and then adopted a similar chemical reduction method to convert the elemental sulfur in porous carbon into Li2S using the lithium metal [60]. Li2S can easily enter the interior of the carbon materials owing to the fluidity of the liquid but still suffers from the polysulfide shuttle for the exposure to the liquid electrolyte.


### 3.2.3. Pyrolysis and Carbon Coating

Carbon layer coating is an effective strategy to reduce direct contact between the electrolyte and Li2S, and to block the shuttle of lithium polysulfides. It is the most common method to prepare carbon-coated Li2S by utilizing the pyrolysis reaction of organics. Liang et al. dispersed the ball-milled commercial Li2S in the polystyrene solution and obtained the uniform size (∼1 μm) carbon-coated Li2S particles followed by a pyrolysis process. The formed carbon layer not only helped confining the lithium polysulfides but also prevented the Li2S particles from agglomerating. The as-prepared Li2S-C composites showed excellent cycling stability with an average decay rate of 0.18% per cycle over 200 cycles [10]. More complicate carbon-coating structures were designed to improve the electrochemical performance of Li2S [31–35]. Wu et al. prepared a hierarchical particle-shell architecture Li2S-C composite (Figure 6) with remarkable long-term cycling performance. In this case, nanosized Li2S particles were embedded into the conductive carbon matrix and then coated by a graphitic outer shell through a CVD method. The hierarchical particle-shell architecture can obviously reduce the internal stresses within outer shells caused by the volume changes during the charge/discharge process and enhance the mechanical stability of the composite. The multilevel protection for Li2S effectively mitigated polysulfide dissolution and achieved excellent cycling performance (∼700 mAh·g−1 after 600 cycles at 0.5°C) [34].Figure 6
Schematic and TEM images of the hierarchical particle-shell architecture Li2S-C composite [34].However, the excessive use of carbon can seriously affect the specific capacity of composite materials. To prepare a dense and effective carbon layer for Li2S particles is the goal for many researchers. Suo et al. successfully prepared a nanoscale carbon cage for Li2S clusters through the two steps of polymerization (350°C) and carbonization (600°C) processes. During the polymerization stage, the agglomerated Li2S particles were departed into Li2S clusters for the shrink of [Emim]-[N(CN)2]. The dense outer carbon layer (∼5 nm) was then formed during the carbonization stage. The as-prepared carbon-coated Li2S clusters also exhibited a high initial capacity of 826 mAh·g−1 at 0.1°C and an excellent capacity retention of 82% after 500 cycles at 1°C [33].Based on the advantages mentioned above and its simple processing, the pyrolysis carbon layer-coating method is also widely used to enhance the physical protection for Li2S in other Li2S-carbon composites as an auxiliary measure. For example, the Li2S-3D porous carbon composites prepared by a liquid infiltration-evaporation method are often followed by a coating treatment for the exposed Li2S [36, 37, 61]. Tu et al. successfully prepared a 3D reduced graphene oxide material embedding carbon-coated Li2S particles through a one-step liquid solution-evaporation-carbonization method. The electrochemical performance of the above Li2S-carbon composite is much better than that of the 3D-rGO-Li2S composite without carbon coating [36].


### 3.2.4. In Situ Reaction

In fact, both mechanical milling and a liquid solution-evaporation method are merely physically mixing Li2S and carbon materials. The poor physical contact between Li2S and carbon materials, as well as the high cost of commercial Li2S particles, is still limiting the practical applications of the Li2S-carbon composites. In recent years, facile synthesis methods of Li2S particles have been developed based on the reduction of sulfur using various reducing agents (LiH, LiEt3BH, etc.). The as-prepared Li2S particles show good electrochemical performance with ultrasmall size (∼8.5 nm) [38]. But a further carbon mixing treatment is still needed to enhance the electronic conductivity. In situ synthesis of the Li2S-carbon composite is a promising new avenue to be developed.Just like the combustion reaction of metallic magnesium in carbon dioxide, metallic lithium can also be burned in carbon disulfide vapor. Li2S/carbon can be obtained by the following reaction:(7)4Lil+CS2g⟶2Li2Ss+CsIt is seen that Li2S and carbon, as the only two products of the combustion reaction of the Li metal with CS2, combined to be a composite just like a “combination reaction” [39, 40]. Tan et al. prepared Li2S particles wrapped by few-layer graphene (10∼20 layers) with a capsule-like nanostructure using the above method. The single-crystalline Li2S core was completely coated by the graphene, and the active mass loading is achieved to be ∼10 mg·cm–2. In the first charging, the composite exhibits 1600 mAh·g−1 (specific capacity of sulfur) with a coulombic efficiency of 72.5%. A reversible capacity >600 mAh·g−1 and a high areal capacity >4.2 mAh·cm−2 remained after 200 cycles [39]. Though the above “combination reaction” has 100% utilization of raw materials in theory, the reaction temperature above 600°C is too high. Liang et al. used LiH instead of the lithium metal as the reducing agent:(8)4LiHs+CS2g⟶2Li2Ss+Cs+2H2gThe reaction temperature was lowered below 250°C and the reaction time was as short as 5 seconds, which are the lowest reaction temperature and the shortest reaction time reported to date for the in situ synthesis of Li2S-carbon composites, as shown in Figure 7 [41].Figure 7
Time-temperature curves of (a) Li2S@PC-CNT and (b) Li2S@PC during the synthesis processes [41].
(a)
(b)Li2SO4 can be reduced by carbon to directly synthesize Li2S-carbon materials through the following reaction [62]:(9)Li2SO4+xC⟶Li2S+xCOyx=1−4;y=1−2Such a facile, cost-effective method has attracted the attention of many researchers [42–48, 62–64]. Through the above method, Li2S can be combined with carbon in various structures by dispersing Li2SO4 in different carbon matrixes. Wang et al. fabricated the nanosized Li2S embedded into porous carbon composites through a one-pot carbonization-reduction method, as shown in Figure 8. The glucose and Li2SO4 mixture was first heated to 600°C for the carbonization, and the Li2SO4 particles were homogeneously distributed in the carbon matrix without turning into Li2S. Then, the temperature went up to 800°C, and Li2SO4 totally converted into Li2S. It is believed that the glucose carbonization can effectively inhibit the growth or aggregation of nano-Li2SO4, which is the key to form homogeneously distributed Li2S-porous carbon composites [43]. More novel structures, such as one-dimensional fibers, two-dimensional sandwich plates, and three-dimensional networks, were also synthesized through the similar method [42, 46, 47].Figure 8
Schematic of the synthesis of Li2S@PC composites [43].The Li2S-carbon composites exhibit a broad application prospect in lithium ions batteries because more and more advanced preparation technologies will be developed. The most Li2S-carbon study focused on the construction of a stable material structure, simple synthesis method, and high active material loading and utilization, but the weak affinity toward polar Li2S and polysulfides for the nonpolar nature of carbon has still not been fundamentally resolved [65]. It is believed that the study of compounds of Li2S-other materials with strong binding is necessary to figure out better solutions for both high capacity and rate performance.


## 3.2.1. Physical Mixing

Physical mixing of Li2S and carbon is regarded as the simplest and most direct method to obtain Li2S-carbon mixtures. Cai et al. reported a typical physical mixing method for preparing the nanostructured Li2S-carbon composite by high-energy ball milling (Figure 4(a)) [18]. After ball milling, the size of Li2S particles reduced from about 20 μm to about 400 nm (∼50 times), and the carbon black is uniformly dispersed on the Li2S surface, as illustrated in Figure 4(a). The morphologies of commercial Li2S and ball-milled Li2S-carbon composite can be observed by scanning electron microscopy (Figures 4(b) and 4(c)). The reduced size of Li2S and uniform dispersion of conductive carbon on the Li2S surface can effectively reduce the lithium-ion transmission distance and increase electronic conductivity, leading to the good electrochemical performance of Li2S-carbon.Figure 4
(a) Schematic of the ball milling process. SEM images of (b) commercial Li2S powder and (c) ball-milled Li2S-carbon composite [18]. (d) Synthetic schematic of the Li2S-plus-C composite [19].In addition to the mixing function, mechanical ball milling is also widely used to reduce the Li2S particle size for further processing [10, 19–21]. For example, Chen et al. used high-energy ball milling to obtain the precursor of Li2S-plus-C composites (Figure 4(d)), which showed a smaller particle size and higher electrochemical activity [19]. It should be noted that the physical mixing is difficult to obtain a composite of which Li2S enters the interior of carbon materials, and the naked Li2S suffers from the serious shuttle effect of lithium polysulfides.


## 3.2.2. Diffusion and Precipitation

Li2S has good solubility in solvents such as ethanol and tetrahydrofuran. As a result, a simple liquid infiltration-evaporation method was widely used to synthesize the Li2S-carbon composite [22–27]. The synthesis process mainly includes three steps: (1) the preparation of the Li2S solution; (2) the infiltration; and (3) the evaporation of the solvent and nucleation of Li2S. This method requires a high specific surface area and porosity of the carbon material (e.g., graphene, carbon nanotube, and porous carbon) to get a higher Li2S content and better dispersion of Li2S in the composite. The synthetic schematic of the Li2S-carbon composite using different carbon materials is displayed in Figure 5 [22–24]. Li2S solution was usually slowly added into the carbon materials until the solvents had visibly evaporated to ensure rapid nucleation of Li2S with a small size [26, 27]. Zhou et al. successfully synthesized a freestanding Li2S-coated graphene cathode through the above method. It showed a reduced initial charge voltage barrier and a high capacity of 403 mAh·g−1 after 300 cycles at 0.5°C. The cross-linked, porous network structure provides not only the homogeneously dispersed nucleation sites but also the fast electron/ion transfer channels.Figure 5
Synthetic schematic of the Li2S-carbon composite based on different carbon materials: (a) ZIF-67; (b) CNT; (c) rGO paper; (d) GO-CNT suspension [22–24].
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Li2S can also be synthesized by a solution-based chemical infiltration method through the following disproportionation reaction of Li2S6 [28, 29, 58]:(5)Li2S6⟶Li2S+58⋅S8The chemical infiltration method is similar to the liquid infiltration-evaporation method. Li2S6 solution is prepared firstly and then absorbed by the carbon materials. During the evaporation process of the solvent, the disproportionation reaction occurred, Li2S and sulfur were formed inside carbon, and extra sulfur was removed by a heat treatment. Strubel et al. reported that the as-prepared Li2S showed a smaller size and higher initial discharge capacity with better cycle stability compared with Li2S prepared by an ethanol-based liquid infiltration-evaporation method [29]. Li2S3 solution is also used to synthesize such a kind of Li2S-carbon composite instead of Li2S6 solution [30].In addition, it is noteworthy that the lithium-triggered chemical reduction is also an effective method to prepare the Li2S-carbon composite. The Li2S6 solution was dropped to the lithiated graphite paper and then assembled into a cell with the lithium metal. The open-circuit voltage of the cell linearly increased from 60 mV to 2.12 V, indicating that Li2S6 was slowly in situ converted to Li2S by the following reaction:(6)Li2S6+10Li+⟶6Li2SOnly 48.4% Li2S6 converted to Li2S because of the insoluble Li2S and Li2S2 formed on the surface of graphite, blocking the pathway for the further reduction reaction [59]. Zheng et al. infiltrated sulfur into the microporous carbon at first and then adopted a similar chemical reduction method to convert the elemental sulfur in porous carbon into Li2S using the lithium metal [60]. Li2S can easily enter the interior of the carbon materials owing to the fluidity of the liquid but still suffers from the polysulfide shuttle for the exposure to the liquid electrolyte.


## 3.2.3. Pyrolysis and Carbon Coating

Carbon layer coating is an effective strategy to reduce direct contact between the electrolyte and Li2S, and to block the shuttle of lithium polysulfides. It is the most common method to prepare carbon-coated Li2S by utilizing the pyrolysis reaction of organics. Liang et al. dispersed the ball-milled commercial Li2S in the polystyrene solution and obtained the uniform size (∼1 μm) carbon-coated Li2S particles followed by a pyrolysis process. The formed carbon layer not only helped confining the lithium polysulfides but also prevented the Li2S particles from agglomerating. The as-prepared Li2S-C composites showed excellent cycling stability with an average decay rate of 0.18% per cycle over 200 cycles [10]. More complicate carbon-coating structures were designed to improve the electrochemical performance of Li2S [31–35]. Wu et al. prepared a hierarchical particle-shell architecture Li2S-C composite (Figure 6) with remarkable long-term cycling performance. In this case, nanosized Li2S particles were embedded into the conductive carbon matrix and then coated by a graphitic outer shell through a CVD method. The hierarchical particle-shell architecture can obviously reduce the internal stresses within outer shells caused by the volume changes during the charge/discharge process and enhance the mechanical stability of the composite. The multilevel protection for Li2S effectively mitigated polysulfide dissolution and achieved excellent cycling performance (∼700 mAh·g−1 after 600 cycles at 0.5°C) [34].Figure 6
Schematic and TEM images of the hierarchical particle-shell architecture Li2S-C composite [34].However, the excessive use of carbon can seriously affect the specific capacity of composite materials. To prepare a dense and effective carbon layer for Li2S particles is the goal for many researchers. Suo et al. successfully prepared a nanoscale carbon cage for Li2S clusters through the two steps of polymerization (350°C) and carbonization (600°C) processes. During the polymerization stage, the agglomerated Li2S particles were departed into Li2S clusters for the shrink of [Emim]-[N(CN)2]. The dense outer carbon layer (∼5 nm) was then formed during the carbonization stage. The as-prepared carbon-coated Li2S clusters also exhibited a high initial capacity of 826 mAh·g−1 at 0.1°C and an excellent capacity retention of 82% after 500 cycles at 1°C [33].Based on the advantages mentioned above and its simple processing, the pyrolysis carbon layer-coating method is also widely used to enhance the physical protection for Li2S in other Li2S-carbon composites as an auxiliary measure. For example, the Li2S-3D porous carbon composites prepared by a liquid infiltration-evaporation method are often followed by a coating treatment for the exposed Li2S [36, 37, 61]. Tu et al. successfully prepared a 3D reduced graphene oxide material embedding carbon-coated Li2S particles through a one-step liquid solution-evaporation-carbonization method. The electrochemical performance of the above Li2S-carbon composite is much better than that of the 3D-rGO-Li2S composite without carbon coating [36].


## 3.2.4. In Situ Reaction

In fact, both mechanical milling and a liquid solution-evaporation method are merely physically mixing Li2S and carbon materials. The poor physical contact between Li2S and carbon materials, as well as the high cost of commercial Li2S particles, is still limiting the practical applications of the Li2S-carbon composites. In recent years, facile synthesis methods of Li2S particles have been developed based on the reduction of sulfur using various reducing agents (LiH, LiEt3BH, etc.). The as-prepared Li2S particles show good electrochemical performance with ultrasmall size (∼8.5 nm) [38]. But a further carbon mixing treatment is still needed to enhance the electronic conductivity. In situ synthesis of the Li2S-carbon composite is a promising new avenue to be developed.Just like the combustion reaction of metallic magnesium in carbon dioxide, metallic lithium can also be burned in carbon disulfide vapor. Li2S/carbon can be obtained by the following reaction:(7)4Lil+CS2g⟶2Li2Ss+CsIt is seen that Li2S and carbon, as the only two products of the combustion reaction of the Li metal with CS2, combined to be a composite just like a “combination reaction” [39, 40]. Tan et al. prepared Li2S particles wrapped by few-layer graphene (10∼20 layers) with a capsule-like nanostructure using the above method. The single-crystalline Li2S core was completely coated by the graphene, and the active mass loading is achieved to be ∼10 mg·cm–2. In the first charging, the composite exhibits 1600 mAh·g−1 (specific capacity of sulfur) with a coulombic efficiency of 72.5%. A reversible capacity >600 mAh·g−1 and a high areal capacity >4.2 mAh·cm−2 remained after 200 cycles [39]. Though the above “combination reaction” has 100% utilization of raw materials in theory, the reaction temperature above 600°C is too high. Liang et al. used LiH instead of the lithium metal as the reducing agent:(8)4LiHs+CS2g⟶2Li2Ss+Cs+2H2gThe reaction temperature was lowered below 250°C and the reaction time was as short as 5 seconds, which are the lowest reaction temperature and the shortest reaction time reported to date for the in situ synthesis of Li2S-carbon composites, as shown in Figure 7 [41].Figure 7
Time-temperature curves of (a) Li2S@PC-CNT and (b) Li2S@PC during the synthesis processes [41].
(a)
(b)Li2SO4 can be reduced by carbon to directly synthesize Li2S-carbon materials through the following reaction [62]:(9)Li2SO4+xC⟶Li2S+xCOyx=1−4;y=1−2Such a facile, cost-effective method has attracted the attention of many researchers [42–48, 62–64]. Through the above method, Li2S can be combined with carbon in various structures by dispersing Li2SO4 in different carbon matrixes. Wang et al. fabricated the nanosized Li2S embedded into porous carbon composites through a one-pot carbonization-reduction method, as shown in Figure 8. The glucose and Li2SO4 mixture was first heated to 600°C for the carbonization, and the Li2SO4 particles were homogeneously distributed in the carbon matrix without turning into Li2S. Then, the temperature went up to 800°C, and Li2SO4 totally converted into Li2S. It is believed that the glucose carbonization can effectively inhibit the growth or aggregation of nano-Li2SO4, which is the key to form homogeneously distributed Li2S-porous carbon composites [43]. More novel structures, such as one-dimensional fibers, two-dimensional sandwich plates, and three-dimensional networks, were also synthesized through the similar method [42, 46, 47].Figure 8
Schematic of the synthesis of Li2S@PC composites [43].The Li2S-carbon composites exhibit a broad application prospect in lithium ions batteries because more and more advanced preparation technologies will be developed. The most Li2S-carbon study focused on the construction of a stable material structure, simple synthesis method, and high active material loading and utilization, but the weak affinity toward polar Li2S and polysulfides for the nonpolar nature of carbon has still not been fundamentally resolved [65]. It is believed that the study of compounds of Li2S-other materials with strong binding is necessary to figure out better solutions for both high capacity and rate performance.


## 3.3. Compound of Li2S with Polar Chemical Binding

Many materials with polar functional groups such as metal oxide, metal sulfide, and polymer materials have been applied in the Li2S compounding [49, 50]. Chen et al. coated ultrathin Al2O3 layers (∼1 nm) onto the Li2S-graphene oxide sponge by an atomic layer deposition (ALD) technique. The three-dimensional graphene oxide contributes high electronic conductivity to the composites, and the Al2O3 layers effectively suppress the dissolution of lithium polysulfides through the strong binding between Al2O3 layers and Li2Sx. As a result, long-term cycling stability (high capacity retention of 88% after 300 cycles at 0.5°C) and high rate performance were achieved simultaneously [50]. LiTiO2 is believed to exhibit a strong binding to the lithium polysulfides and to induce the conversion of long polysulfides into short polysulfides, which have lower solubility in electrolytes. LiTiO2 can be synthesized by the following reaction at 650°C:(10)TiO2+Li2S⟶2LiTiO2+S↑gWhen the TiO2 particles and Li2S were simultaneously dissolved in anhydrous ethanol, the formed LiTiO2 particles were uniformly distributed within the Li2S agglomerates. The as-synthesized product showed unsatisfactory electrochemical performance. Wu et al. adjusted the preparation using titanium isopropoxide as the liquid titanium source instead of TiO2 particles. In such a solution situation, the Li2S nanoparticles got nucleated first due to the lower solubility in ethanol during the early stage of solution evaporation and immediately got wrapped by Ti species in the further evaporation, forming a core-shell structure and reducing agglomeration. The LiTiO2-coated Li2S particles ranging from 100 to 200 nm showed remarkable cycling stability and good rate performance. In addition, the formation of Ti–S bonding is proved to be beneficial for the conversion reaction of Li2S into polysulfides by lowering the activation barrier. Compared with commonly used graphene, a multilayered Ti3C3 material fabricated by Liang et al. exhibited better chemical absorption of polysulfides as the Li2S host, and the activation barrier of the Ti3C2-Li2S composite cathode decreased to 2.85 V, a 0.6 V potential lower than that of the graphene/Li2S composite cathode [51].Metal sulfide is another popular material used in the Li2S composite for its sulfur composition and strong chemical interaction toward lithium polysulfides. He et al. used the metal sulfide (TS, TS=NiS, CoS, MnS) to decorate the carbon sponge. The uniformly dispersed polar 0D metal sulfide nanodots accelerate the Li-S redox reaction and absorb the lithium polysulfides through the strong binding. The 1D carbon nanowires cross-linked with 2D graphene nanosheets avoid aggregation and construct a 3D porous and conductive network, which not only facilitate the electronic and ionic conduction but also provide enough space for hosting Li2S (Figure 9). Among the above metal sulfides, CoS has the highest electrocatalytic effect and exhibits an outstanding electrochemical performance with a high areal capacity of 8.44 mAh·cm−2 [66].Figure 9
(a) Schematic of the synthesis of the 3DTSC. (b) Schematic of the function mechanism of metal sulfides [66].
(a)
(b)Cui’s group coated the Li2S particles with a TiS2 shell (∼20 nm) using a chemical reaction method:(11)TiCl4+2Li2S⟶TiS2+4LiClAs calculated, the binding energy between Li2S and TiS2 is 10 times higher than that of Li2S with carbon-based graphene. Due to the high electronic conductivity of TiS2, the electronic conductivity of the Li2S-TiS2 composite is 10 times higher than that of the pure Li2S. The Li2S-TiS2 composite delivered stable specific capacities (700, 650, 608, 595, and 560 mAh·g−1) at different C rates (0.2°C, 0.5°C, 1°C, 2°C, and 3°C). Other transition metal disulfides such as ZrS2 and VS2 were also investigated using the same reaction mechanism:(12)MCl4+2Li2S⟶MS2+4LiClM=Ti,Zr, and VThe calculated binding energies of ZrS2 and VS2 with Li2S are 2.70 and 2.94 eV, respectively, which are 9-10 times higher than that of Li2S with carbon-based graphene [52].The conducting polymer is believed to be the ideal material for the Li2S composites because of its high electronic conductivity, soft nature, and sufficient polar function groups [53, 67–69]. Polypyrrole has been the most popular conductive polymer in recent years. When coupled to Li2S in a Li/S or lithium-ion battery, the N atoms in polypyrrole can interact strongly with Li2S, leading to a uniform and complete coating of Li2S by polypyrrole with strong adhesion. The core-shell structure and Li-N interaction between the polypyrrole and lithium polysulfides effectively avoid the polysulfide species dissolution into the electrolyte, enabling the Li2S-polypyrrole cathode to maintain a stable capacity performance of 785 mAh·g−1 after 400 cycles [53].Besides the design of active Li2S composites, binder and electrolyte modification is another avenue to avoid the polysulfide dissolution. There are various functional groups in the polymer binders. Seh et al. selected poly(vinylpyrrolidone) as the optimal binder for the Li2S cathode based on the binding energies between the functional groups and lithium polysulfides calculated by ab initio simulations. The high binding energy of >C=O groups in PVP with Li2S and lithium polysulfides results in a uniform dispersion of the active material and carbon in the electrode slurry and inhibition of polysulfide dissolution [70]. However, the strong binding between PVP and Li2S will cause a boosted initial potential barrier for the inhibition of lithium-ion diffusion. According to Liu’s results, this could be alleviated by using a PVP and polyethylene oxide (PEO) mixed binder for the excellent ionic conductivity of PEO [20]. Wang et al. adopted a two-phase organic electrolyte system: the cathode electrolyte (carbonate) and anode electrolyte (ether) were separated by an ion-conducting glass ceramic separator. The polysulfides could be well constrained on the cathode side without shuttling [71].To achieve the full theoretical capacity of 1167 mAh·g−1, a high initial charge potential of 4.0 VLi for the Li2S cathode is needed. However, the commonly used ether-based electrolyte solutions are unstable at such a high potential [72]. A lower cutoff of 3.6 VLi is usually employed for the stable running of Li-S batteries despite a lower utilization of Li2S. Additions of redox mediators (decamethylferrocene, LiI, and ferrocene) [15], P2S5 [73], and lithium polysulfides [14] for the electrolyte were reported to be effective in enhancing the Li2S utilization. Redox mediators can be electrooxidized on the electrode surface and diffuse into the interior to oxidize the inactive Li2S. The Li2S cathode can thus be completely activated by the above reversible redox reactions at a low initial charge potential. The initial charge shows a flat potential plateau implying the proceeding of the reversible redox reactions [71]. A similar behavior can be seen while adding P2S5 into the electrolyte, and intermediate sulfur- and phosphorus-containing species will be formed on the L2S surface, which can assist the surface charge transfer [73].


## 4. Preliminary Exploration of the Li2S Cathode in Full Cells

A lithium metal anode suffers from the safety problems for the excessive formation of lithium dendrites. A lithium sulfide cathode can avoid the use of lithium metal anodes and pair with the lithium metal-free anodes (Si, Sn, graphite, transition-metal oxides, etc. [54–57, 74–79]) to assemble the full cells.Si has a high theoretical capacity of 4212 mAh·g−1, which can pair with Li2S (1166 mAh·g−1) to form a full cell with high energy density [54, 55]. Yang et al. prepared a Li2S-mesoporous carbon cathode to pair with the silicon nanowire anode. The theoretical specific energy of the Li2S/Si full cell can reach 1550 Wh·kg−1, 4 times that of the commercialized LIBs (LiCoO2/graphite and LiFePO4/graphite). The initial discharge specific energy reached 630 Wh·kg−1. However, the Li2S-Si full cell showed a rapid capacity fading compared to the Li2S/Li half cell, which is probably related to the loss of the lithium source during cycling arising from the irreversible reaction and deep discharge or overcharge of Li2S or silicon for the uncontrollable single electrode voltage [55].Graphite is a more commercial choice for the anode of the Li2S full cell for its low cost, mature production process, and stable electrochemical performance (one Li atom can be accommodated per six C atoms with 9%–13% volume change during graphite lithiation). The Li2S/graphite full cell delivered an initial discharge capacity of 1006 mAh·g−1 and a long cell life with 500 cycles [74]. However, the graphite anode is highly electrolyte-selective. On the one hand, the commonly used Li-ion carbonate electrolytes are suitable for the graphite, while the polysulfides are reactive in it. On the other hand, the graphite anode is unstable in the ether electrolytes, which are used in the Li-S batteries during cycling. Wang et al. found that the cycled graphite particles can be partly exfoliated by the DOL/DME solvent molecules, but the exfoliation of graphite was alleviated when adding LiNO3 into the electrolyte [43]. Li et al. used HFE (1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl ether) diluted solvate ionic liquids (ILs) as the Li2S/graphite full cell electrolyte. The ILs showed high Li+ transportation, stabilized the lithiation/delithiation of graphite, and had a low solubility of polysulfides [56].Among the transition-metal oxides, MnO2 shows a considerable theoretical capacity of 1232 mAh·g−1, which matches well with that of the Li2S cathode. The theoretical specific energy of the Li2S/MnO2 full cell can reach 1020 Wh·kg−1. As shown in Figure 10, the Li2S/MnO2 full cell assembled by the Li2S-rGO cathode and rGO-MnO2 anode exhibits long charge/discharge plateaus, a high initial discharge capacity of 587.5 mAh·g−1, a capacity retention of 80.5% after 150 cycles, and a high specific energy of 827.3 Wh·kg−1Li2S (455.0 Wh·kg−1cathode) [57].Figure 10
(a) Initial charge-discharge profiles. (b) Cycling performance of the Li2S/MnO2 full cell [57].
(a)
(b)


## 5. Conclusions and Outlook

To meet the ever-growing demand for high-density energy storage devices, lithium-ion battery cathodes with high specific capacity are the bottlenecks of present LIBs. Li2S is regarded as one of the most promising cathode materials for next-generation lithium-ion batteries due to its high theoretical capacity of 1166 mAh·g−1. However, the commercial applications of the Li2S cathode are limited by its high initial activation barrier, shuttle of lithium polysulfides, and low electronic and ionic conductivity. Much progress has been made in tackling the above challenges. This review gives a systematical summary on the recent progress in the activation and lithium storage mechanism of Li2S, the improvement of lithium storage performance of Li2S in half cells, and the preliminary exploration in full cells. Strategies for improving the electrochemical performance are emphasized. Li2S composites can exhibit better cycling and rate performances by the introduction of conductive materials, construction of the structure, and chemical binding for inhibiting the shuttle of lithium polysulfides. According to the combination mode of Li2S with carbon, Li2S-carbon composites are synthesized by the following 4 methods: (1) physical mixing, (2) dissolution and precipitation, (3) chemical carbon layer coating, and (4) in situ reaction.Li2S cathode materials have attracted much attention for the high theoretical capacity. Despite the efforts made to improve the electrochemical performance, more electrochemical improvements are needed for the wide commercial applications. The commercial Li2S is too expensive because it is synthesized in the organic solvents. Further works can be devoted to the large-scale synthesis of Li2S-based composites at low temperatures from low-cost and sustainable raw materials. The high-performance and low-cost electrolytes are also needed for developing lithium-ion batteries. Better understanding of the activation mechanism of the Li2S cathode in full cells is required. Among the modified Li2S composites, nanoscale Li2S-carbon composites can effectively reduce the activation barrier and improve the cycling performance. The future development trend of Li2S composites is likely to be the specific structure design and functional groups introduced to increase the mass loading of active Li2S and effectively inhibit the shuttle of lithium polysulfides. The electrochemical performance of the Li2S cathode coupled with the lithium metal-free anode should be further improved for developing next-generation lithium-ion batteries with both high energy density and safety.



---

*Source: 6904517-2020-02-21.xml*