# Inferring Molecular Processes Heterogeneity from Transcriptional Data

Authors: Krzysztof Gogolewski; Weronika Wronowska; Agnieszka Lech; Bogdan Lesyng; Anna Gambin
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

RNA microarrays and RNA-seq are nowadays standard technologies to study the transcriptional activity of cells. Most studies focus on tracking transcriptional changes caused by specific experimental conditions. Information referring to genes up- and downregulation is evaluated analyzing the behaviour of relatively large population of cells by averaging its properties. However, even assuming perfect sample homogeneity, different subpopulations of cells can exhibit diverse transcriptomic profiles, as they may follow different regulatory/signaling pathways. The purpose of this study is to provide a novel methodological scheme to account for possible internal, functional heterogeneity in homogeneous cell lines, including cancer ones. We propose a novel computational method to infer the proportion between subpopulations of cells that manifest various functional behaviour in a given sample. Our method was validated using two datasets from RNA microarray experiments. Both experiments aimed to examine cell viability in specific experimental conditions. The presented methodology can be easily extended to RNA-seq data as well as other molecular processes. Moreover, it complements standard tools to indicate most important networks from transcriptomic data and in particular could be useful in the analysis of cancer cell lines affected by biologically active compounds or drugs.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

RNA microarrays and RNA-seq are one of the most popular high-throughput methods used in the advanced medical diagnostics, personalized medicine, and basic research. Although an application of these methods provides an insight into the full transcriptome of examined sample, the knowledge gained in this way is based upon an averaged gene expression in a bulk population. This fact introduces a specific bias into the outcome of gene expression measurements, especially, because a biological material is rarely homogeneous. A sample heterogeneity is either due to the diversity of cell types in case of tissue samples, or due to minor gene expression differences in samples obtained from cell lines. In both cases an observed average expression level may conceal relevant, cell-specific properties or mechanisms activated only in subpopulations of cells [1, 2]. Therefore, we have developed a novel computational method to infer the contribution of cell subpopulations to the observed expression of genes. We call the proposed method MPH after Molecular Process Heterogeneity. So far, a couple of methods were proposed to deal with the problem of mixed cell types in biological samples, that is, tissues. Mostly they are based on the expression matrix decomposition and yield the information about (i) proportions of different cell types in a given sample and (ii) expression profiles specific for each detected cell-type. As an example, in [3], authors introduce the method based on the least squares nonnegative matrix factorization for discovery of cell-specific marker genes with noisy signals because of varying cell-type proportions in a sample. The state of the art in computational methods for determination of sample cellular content and cell-specific expression profiles is summarized in [4]. However, not only the subpopulation-specific behaviour, but also limited information about gene regulatory networks reduces the possibility of a meaningful inference from the transcriptomic data.A closely related topic refers to the reconstruction of gene regulatory networks from mRNA expression data. A plethora of methods were proposed, but none of them brought a spectacular success. In particular, Zhang et al. [5] presented a method considering the path consistency algorithm based on the conditional mutual information. Also some improvements of the standard path consistency algorithms have already been proposed, such as the elimination of the gene ordering problem [6]. The other approach proposed by Dojer et al. [7] successfully applies dynamic Bayesian networks for the gene regulatory network inference based on the perturbed gene expression data.Here, we decided to explore the already existing knowledge on the regulome and the signalome to provide an insight into the heterogeneity of molecular processes in a cell population under study. Therefore, the proposed methodology complements the above-mentioned procedures for inferring gene regulatory networks. Our method explores the functional heterogeneity of a given cell population sample through the quantification of the intensity of molecular processes occurring in it.The proposed approach was tested using the data from two independentin vitro experiments. The first one was aimed to assess the global transcriptomic changes occurring in the ovarian cancer cell line SKOV3 upon paracrine signaling present in the peritoneal cavity. The second one was aimed to decipher how the ceramide induced pathways are affected by the inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in the neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y. In both test-case studies the MPH method was used on microarray expression data to estimate the changes in the viability of variously treated populations of cells. The obtained computational predictions were validated with the results of additional wet-lab assays.The paper is organized as follows. In the next section we present the workflow of the MPH method and validation strategies that are applied. Materials and Methods contains the description of the biological experiments and the detailed presentation of the computational method. In Results an insight into the final outcomes from the MPH method is provided and in Discussion we elaborate about the compatibility of computational and experimental results as well as the method effectiveness. Finally, in Conclusions we summarize our work and point out the future steps that we plan to undertake.


## 2. Overview of the MPH Method

Our goal is to estimate the proportion of different cell subpopulations existing in the analyzed sample being a type-homogeneous population of cells. We assume that there exist at least two different molecular processes manifested by different transcriptional activity of a specific cell subpopulation. Specifically, the proportion should be understood as a qualitative contribution of each subpopulation into the transcriptomic signal observed in the data retrieved from the whole sample.Along with the proportions, we determine transcription patterns specific for each subpopulation. Again, it should be mentioned that values assigned to the expression of each gene in the patterns are not strictly levels of transcription, but rather correspond to the trends observed in detected subpopulations. The MPH method described below was validated using the gene expression data from two case studies described in detail in Materials and Methods.To quantify the composition of the sample, we adapted the computational framework designed originally for the deconvolution of a gene expression matrix from heterogeneous samples [8]. The method decomposes an expression matrix into components representing the description of different tissues that were mixed in the sample. Here, since we assume the sample homogeneity (as we study the cell lines), the deconvolution is expected to reveal the heterogeneity at molecular processes level; that is, different expression profiles are inferred for cell subpopulations that proliferate and those that remain in a dormant state (case study 1) or proapoptotic condition (case study 2). Figure 1 presents the outline of the MPH method.Figure 1
An overview of the concept of the article: (a) an insight into the workflow of the MPH algorithm; (b) the general use case of our algorithm.
(a)
The MPH algorithm
(b)
Experimental designThe procedure starts with the routine processing of the raw data from the microarray experiments resulting in normalized, filtered (i.e., quality controlled) expressions for each experimental scenario. Then, for the further analysis we select only these genes that differentiate the experimental conditions in the considered study in a statistically significant manner.The next step is theDSection algorithm (i.e., an unsupervised matrix decomposition method) [9]. It requires the starting proportions as a priori knowledge for Bayesian model and provides information about specific gene profiles detected during the decomposition of the expression matrix. Intuitively, one can think of this step as the form of a clustering procedure; the algorithm points out samples described by similar transcription patterns and consequently by potentially similar functional activity, given the expected proportion, which can be randomly or uniformly distributed if no additional knowledge is provided. From these gene profiles statistically significant genes are selected, then annotated, and validated using DAVID tool [10], to finally constitute a marker list per profile describing specific functions and pathways currently active in the cells under the study.The lists of marker genes are used as an input to the second decomposition phase calledssKL which is a modified version of the algorithm proposed in [11]. The outcome of this step is twofold: the estimated proportions of functionally homogeneous cell subpopulations and the gene expression profiles specific for these subpopulations, thus also for the molecular processes taking place in them.Results of this step are validated using the dedicatedin vitro wet-lab assay (in our case studies the Resazurin Reduction Assay and the MTT assay, resp.). Finally, marker genes from the previous step were assessed to find out whether they characterize specific functions.The MPH framework was used to verify two hypotheses that were addressed in the conducted experiments. First, we want to assess and compare the putative paracrine influence of K21 fibroblasts and SKOV3 cells on ovarian cancer cell proliferation. It is presumed that, despite serum-free conditions, secretion products of both cell types are able to prompt SKOV3 cell divisions and that the stromal signaling exerts a stronger effect.In the second case, we want to computationally quantify the influence of PJ34-PARP inhibitor on the viability of the C2-ceramide treated cells. The hypothesis claims that PJ34 poses a cytoprotective character. For detailed description of the biological background of both case studies see AppendixA.Finally, thanks to our approach that determines function-specific transcriptomic profiles, we provide the most important markers characterizing concrete cellular functions. Here, it should be emphasized that the knowledge about gene regulation in cancerous cells is still quite vague and selection of novel biomarkers for specific cellular processes might improve our understanding of cancer development mechanisms.


## 3. Materials and Methods

### 3.1. Cell Culture Experiments

The ovarian cancer cell lines SKOV3 (HTB-77) and the human neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC); healthy fibroblast cell line K21 was a gift from Dr. Barbara Tudek (Institute of Genetics and Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Science). Cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2.Case Study 1. SKOV3 and K21 cells were cultivated in a high glutamine RPMI (Cytogen), supplemented with 10% FBS (Cytogen), 20 mM HEPES (Cytogen), and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin solution (Cytogen). To obtain conditioned media, cells were cultivated up to 80% confluence, washed three times with PBS solution, and incubated in the serum-free culture media. Following the 72-hour growth, the conditioned media (CM) were collected and filtered (0,22 um) to remove cellular debris.Case Study 2. The SH-SY5Y (Sigma-Aldrich) cells were cultured in MEM/F-12 Ham Nutrient Mixtures (1 : 1) (Biowest) supplemented with 15% heat-inactivated FBS (Cytogen), 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 2 mM glutamine (Sigma-Aldrich). Prior to treatment, the cells were cultivated in low serum medium (2% FBS).


### 3.2. Microarray Experiments

Case Study 1. For the microarray experiments, SKOV3 cells were cultured up to 70% confluence, washed twice with PBS, and incubated for 48 hours in media conditioned by SKOV3 cells (CM-SKOV3) or K21 (CM-K21). Following CM culture, mRNA was isolated using Trizol reagent followed by DNase treatment (Roche) and purification using RNAeasy extraction kit from Qiagen. Samples of 200 ng of total RNA were analyzed on Affymetrix GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array. We analyzed three RNA samples per condition.Case Study 2. SH-SY5Y cells were cultivated for 3, 6, and 24 hours in the following experimental settings supplied with (i) 25 μM C2-ceramide d18:1/2:0 (Enzo Life Sciences); (ii) 25 μM C2-eramide d18:1/2:0 (Enzo Life Sciences) and 20 μM PARP-1 inhibitor PJ-34 (Sigma-Aldrich); (iii) pure medium for control samples. The experiment was done in three replicates. After 3, 6, and 24 hours of cultivation cells were collected and RNA was purified using Affymetrix PrepEase RNA Spin Kit. The whole-transcript analysis was conducted using Affymetrix Human Gene 2.1 ST Array Plates.Gene lists were annotated and analyzed using Qiagen’s Ingenuity Pathway Analysis tools (https://www.qiagen.com/ingenuity, IPA®, Qiagen Redwood City).


### 3.3. Cell Proliferation Assay

Case Study 1. Cell proliferation was performed in six repeats by Resazurin (Sigma-Aldrich) Reduction Assay. Briefly, 2000 SKOV3s/well were seeded in 96-well plate. Following treatment for the indicated time, 10 μl of 0,01% resazurin solution was added to each well and incubated at 37°C for up to 72 h. The fluorescence was measured at different time points with a Multimode Microplate Readers (BioTek) at a wavelength of 590 nm. Proliferation curves were analyzed using GraphPad Prism software (version 5, GraphPad Software, Inc.).Case Study 2. After treating SH-SY5Y cells with different compounds, cell viability was evaluated using 2-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay (MTT; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Representative samples were collected from each experimental setting, MTT was added to all of the wells. The cells were incubated at 37°C for 2 h, followed by cell lysis and spectrophotometric measurement at 595 nm.


### 3.4. Computational Method

In our work we applied the matrix deconvolution algorithms that originally were used in the analysis of heterogeneous samples being composed of different cell types in some proportions. In general, these methods cover a wide range of approaches which try to decompose a gene expression matrixX (rows represent genes; columns represent samples) into the product of two matrices W and H of given rank k (the rank corresponds to the number of expected cell types in a sample): (1)X=WH+ϵ,where W is a matrix with a cell-specific transcriptome (rows represent genes and each column corresponds to one of the expected cell types), H is a matrix with proportions of cells in each sample (rows represent the expected cell types; columns represent samples), and ϵ models the error/noise.In this study we are especially interested in two algorithms:DSection and ssKL. DSection algorithm [9] is an unsupervised approach to the matrix decomposition problem. The only knowledge, that is expected as an input, is the initial, a priori proportion of cell types. The algorithm estimates both cell-specific transcriptome and cell proportions using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach.In the context of our problem, assume we haveJ cell-type homogeneous samples; in each sample T cell subpopulations are involved in different molecular processes and C experimental conditions. For each sample j the a priori knowledge pj=(p1j,…,pTj) about proportions of cells with specific function is also given. Then the expression yij of the ith gene in jth sample is described as (2)yi,j=pjxi,cj=∑t=1Tpt,jxt,i,cj+ϵi,j,where xi,c(j)=(x1,i,c(j),…,xT,i,c(j)) represents the contribution of different cell subpopulations (i.e., different molecular activities of cells) to the observed ith expression profile and ϵi,j is a normally distributed noise reflecting replication noise with variance 1/λi, for some constant λi. Hence, the likelihood of yi,j can be described as (3)yi,j∣pj,xi,λi~N∑t=1Tpt,jxt,i,cj,1λi.Note that the replication variance, 1/λi, is heteroscedastic across probes and homoscedastic across cell subpopulations and experimental conditions. Finally, assuming i.i.d. measurements (which may not always be the case) a factorized form for the joint data (D) likelihood can be written as (4)fD∣θ=∏i=1I∏j=1Jfyi,j∣pj,xj,λi,where θ represents all model parameters; that is, θ=(p,x,λ). More detailed description of prior specifications, sampler construction, and posterior sampling, that is, probability of acceptance of one step in constructed mixed Gibbs and Metropolis-Hastings sampler, can be found in [9].On the other hand,ssKL is an approach that is based on iteratively computed approximation of a desired decomposition. In our case it is supported by a list of marker genes characterizing molecular functions that are active in the sample of interest and regulate its observed transcriptome. Specifically, the factorization X~WH, given a desired rank k (i.e., number of expected cell subpopulations/activities), starts with a random initialization of W and H matrices which are then updated to minimize a divergence functional:(5)FX,W,H=∑i,jXi,jlog⁡Xi,jWHi,j-Xi,j+WHi,j.The approximation in the algorithm is performed in two steps using the coupled divergence equations: (6)Hi,j⟵Hi,j∑tWt,iXt,j/WHt,j∑kWk,i,Wt,i⟵Wt,i∑jHi,jXt,j/WHt,j∑lHi,l.It should be emphasized that even though the algorithm does not need to necessarily converge to the same solution on each run (see [11] for details), in our case study the method turns out to provide consistent and robust results throughout repetitive runs.Both presented algorithms originally referred to the identification of cell-type specific transcriptomic profiles composing the investigated sample. However, in the next section we will show that these methods can be successfully applied to determine the activity-related proportions and markers in cell-type homogeneous samples that are characterized by the heterogeneity of undergoing molecular processes.


## 3.1. Cell Culture Experiments

The ovarian cancer cell lines SKOV3 (HTB-77) and the human neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC); healthy fibroblast cell line K21 was a gift from Dr. Barbara Tudek (Institute of Genetics and Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Science). Cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2.Case Study 1. SKOV3 and K21 cells were cultivated in a high glutamine RPMI (Cytogen), supplemented with 10% FBS (Cytogen), 20 mM HEPES (Cytogen), and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin solution (Cytogen). To obtain conditioned media, cells were cultivated up to 80% confluence, washed three times with PBS solution, and incubated in the serum-free culture media. Following the 72-hour growth, the conditioned media (CM) were collected and filtered (0,22 um) to remove cellular debris.Case Study 2. The SH-SY5Y (Sigma-Aldrich) cells were cultured in MEM/F-12 Ham Nutrient Mixtures (1 : 1) (Biowest) supplemented with 15% heat-inactivated FBS (Cytogen), 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 2 mM glutamine (Sigma-Aldrich). Prior to treatment, the cells were cultivated in low serum medium (2% FBS).


## 3.2. Microarray Experiments

Case Study 1. For the microarray experiments, SKOV3 cells were cultured up to 70% confluence, washed twice with PBS, and incubated for 48 hours in media conditioned by SKOV3 cells (CM-SKOV3) or K21 (CM-K21). Following CM culture, mRNA was isolated using Trizol reagent followed by DNase treatment (Roche) and purification using RNAeasy extraction kit from Qiagen. Samples of 200 ng of total RNA were analyzed on Affymetrix GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array. We analyzed three RNA samples per condition.Case Study 2. SH-SY5Y cells were cultivated for 3, 6, and 24 hours in the following experimental settings supplied with (i) 25 μM C2-ceramide d18:1/2:0 (Enzo Life Sciences); (ii) 25 μM C2-eramide d18:1/2:0 (Enzo Life Sciences) and 20 μM PARP-1 inhibitor PJ-34 (Sigma-Aldrich); (iii) pure medium for control samples. The experiment was done in three replicates. After 3, 6, and 24 hours of cultivation cells were collected and RNA was purified using Affymetrix PrepEase RNA Spin Kit. The whole-transcript analysis was conducted using Affymetrix Human Gene 2.1 ST Array Plates.Gene lists were annotated and analyzed using Qiagen’s Ingenuity Pathway Analysis tools (https://www.qiagen.com/ingenuity, IPA®, Qiagen Redwood City).


## 3.3. Cell Proliferation Assay

Case Study 1. Cell proliferation was performed in six repeats by Resazurin (Sigma-Aldrich) Reduction Assay. Briefly, 2000 SKOV3s/well were seeded in 96-well plate. Following treatment for the indicated time, 10 μl of 0,01% resazurin solution was added to each well and incubated at 37°C for up to 72 h. The fluorescence was measured at different time points with a Multimode Microplate Readers (BioTek) at a wavelength of 590 nm. Proliferation curves were analyzed using GraphPad Prism software (version 5, GraphPad Software, Inc.).Case Study 2. After treating SH-SY5Y cells with different compounds, cell viability was evaluated using 2-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay (MTT; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Representative samples were collected from each experimental setting, MTT was added to all of the wells. The cells were incubated at 37°C for 2 h, followed by cell lysis and spectrophotometric measurement at 595 nm.


## 3.4. Computational Method

In our work we applied the matrix deconvolution algorithms that originally were used in the analysis of heterogeneous samples being composed of different cell types in some proportions. In general, these methods cover a wide range of approaches which try to decompose a gene expression matrixX (rows represent genes; columns represent samples) into the product of two matrices W and H of given rank k (the rank corresponds to the number of expected cell types in a sample): (1)X=WH+ϵ,where W is a matrix with a cell-specific transcriptome (rows represent genes and each column corresponds to one of the expected cell types), H is a matrix with proportions of cells in each sample (rows represent the expected cell types; columns represent samples), and ϵ models the error/noise.In this study we are especially interested in two algorithms:DSection and ssKL. DSection algorithm [9] is an unsupervised approach to the matrix decomposition problem. The only knowledge, that is expected as an input, is the initial, a priori proportion of cell types. The algorithm estimates both cell-specific transcriptome and cell proportions using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach.In the context of our problem, assume we haveJ cell-type homogeneous samples; in each sample T cell subpopulations are involved in different molecular processes and C experimental conditions. For each sample j the a priori knowledge pj=(p1j,…,pTj) about proportions of cells with specific function is also given. Then the expression yij of the ith gene in jth sample is described as (2)yi,j=pjxi,cj=∑t=1Tpt,jxt,i,cj+ϵi,j,where xi,c(j)=(x1,i,c(j),…,xT,i,c(j)) represents the contribution of different cell subpopulations (i.e., different molecular activities of cells) to the observed ith expression profile and ϵi,j is a normally distributed noise reflecting replication noise with variance 1/λi, for some constant λi. Hence, the likelihood of yi,j can be described as (3)yi,j∣pj,xi,λi~N∑t=1Tpt,jxt,i,cj,1λi.Note that the replication variance, 1/λi, is heteroscedastic across probes and homoscedastic across cell subpopulations and experimental conditions. Finally, assuming i.i.d. measurements (which may not always be the case) a factorized form for the joint data (D) likelihood can be written as (4)fD∣θ=∏i=1I∏j=1Jfyi,j∣pj,xj,λi,where θ represents all model parameters; that is, θ=(p,x,λ). More detailed description of prior specifications, sampler construction, and posterior sampling, that is, probability of acceptance of one step in constructed mixed Gibbs and Metropolis-Hastings sampler, can be found in [9].On the other hand,ssKL is an approach that is based on iteratively computed approximation of a desired decomposition. In our case it is supported by a list of marker genes characterizing molecular functions that are active in the sample of interest and regulate its observed transcriptome. Specifically, the factorization X~WH, given a desired rank k (i.e., number of expected cell subpopulations/activities), starts with a random initialization of W and H matrices which are then updated to minimize a divergence functional:(5)FX,W,H=∑i,jXi,jlog⁡Xi,jWHi,j-Xi,j+WHi,j.The approximation in the algorithm is performed in two steps using the coupled divergence equations: (6)Hi,j⟵Hi,j∑tWt,iXt,j/WHt,j∑kWk,i,Wt,i⟵Wt,i∑jHi,jXt,j/WHt,j∑lHi,l.It should be emphasized that even though the algorithm does not need to necessarily converge to the same solution on each run (see [11] for details), in our case study the method turns out to provide consistent and robust results throughout repetitive runs.Both presented algorithms originally referred to the identification of cell-type specific transcriptomic profiles composing the investigated sample. However, in the next section we will show that these methods can be successfully applied to determine the activity-related proportions and markers in cell-type homogeneous samples that are characterized by the heterogeneity of undergoing molecular processes.


## 4. Results

Here, we assume that the expression level for each gene is the result of an expression activity in two distinct cell subpopulations. In our case studies one of them consists of actively dividing cells and the second one consists of cells with activated specific signaling pathways of the other type. Building on this premise, the decomposition of the expression matrix yields the proportions of the characterized cell subpopulations.


### 4.1. Marker Genes Selection

In order to assure the computational efficiency of used algorithmic solutions, we first reduce the number of analyzed genes. We use only genes that differentiate experimental conditions in a statistically significant way according to the two-sampleT-test with p value less than 0.05. Such filtering resulted in 3946 and 3983 genes, respectively, per case study, that were used in further decomposition analysis.According to the presented workflow, we first answered the question if samples’ profiles for such selected genes exhibit any specific inner structure. Application ofDSection algorithm determined a decomposition of the expression matrix. Taking into consideration the character of our experimental data and provided assays, in both our case studies we set the prior knowledge as a uniform proportion of two functional subpopulations.In each case study, annotation of the genes that differentiate well between two obtained profiles (i.e., top 500 genes with the highest fold change) was performed using DAVID tool [10, 12]. It provides groups of marker genes characteristic for each profile based on the functional enrichment analysis. This classification was systematically verified using literature reports on each gene function. For the subsequent analysis only genes known to enhance particular process were selected.In the first case study we end up with the marker genes for (i) the proliferation activity composed of 12 genes, CDC20, TK1, KNL1, CENPE, STIL, ANLN, NDC1, NUF2, KIF20A, PLK4, CCNB1, and CCNA2, and (ii) the quiescence state composed of 12 genes: COL5A1, TGFBI, TCEA2, WNT9A, MMP11, LAMB1, KRT14, LTBP1, PHLDB1, TIMP3, LRP1, and COL18A1.On the other hand, in the second case the following marker genes are described: (i) proliferation regulation including 11 genes, CD24, NRP1, TNS3, MYC, CD38, CCNA2, FGF7, MST1R, MYCN, ETS1, and EDNRA, and (ii) cell death related regulation including 12 genes: DDIT3, ERN1, JUN, SQSTM1, SMPD1, TGFB1, PRNP, CEBPB, NQO1, NR4A1, CTSB, and ZMAT3.The expression patterns of all selected marker genes can be investigated in Figure2, while their full names are given in Appendix B (Tables 3 and 4). Additionally, we have performed a bunch of tests to detect how the outcome of the MPH method is dependent on the number of marker genes used in the ssKL step. It turned out that a set of 10–12 genes is sufficient to keep the percentage results robust. Moreover, we verified how the average fold change of selected marker genes influences the final predicted proportions in the ssKL algorithm; see Appendix C.Figure 2
Expression patterns of marker genes for each case study. The (a) panel describes 12 genes that regulate proliferation and 12 genes that regulate maintenance/survival functions. On the other hand, the (b) panel describes 12 genes related to positive regulation of the cell death processes (blue stripe) and 11 genes related to positive regulation of proliferation mechanisms (red stripe).
(a)
Case study 1
(b)
Case study 2


### 4.2. Estimation of Functional Heterogeneity

During the next phase, the obtained marker genes sets were used forssKL method to predict the final proportion of different cell activities in the analyzed samples. In both case studies we observed significant differences in fractions of cells exhibiting investigated behaviours (see Figure 3).Figure 3
The comparison of the experimental results (left) with the theoretical estimation of functional proportions in subpopulations (right) for both analyzed case studies: (a) compares proliferation activity in the 48th hour of SKOV3 experiment; (b) compares behaviour in the 6th hour of the SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma experiment.
(a)
Case study 1
(b)
Case study 2In order to validate presented methods and significance of their outcomes we have performed the log-likelihood ratio test. It was measured how much the complex model with more degrees of freedom (assuming functionally heterogeneous population) fits the data better than the hypothesis assuming homogeneous population (H0). In each experimental condition H0 was rejected in favor of H1 (see Appendix C).In most of the analyzed experimental variants our results were consistent with the results of biological assays and the literature based predictions. Our analysis indicate that secretion products of both SKOV3 cells and the fibroblast cell line K21 are able to activate cellular proliferation. However, the effect of stromal cells is much more pronounced. The results of predictions based on MPH method have been completely confirmed by Resazurin Reduction Assay.Concerning the neuroblastoma cell line we have shown that in the control environment the fraction of proliferating cells is higher than in both experimental conditions, which was expected and consistent with MTT assay. Moreover, we observe that the reaction to external treatment is the strongest in the 6-hour time frame and seems to stabilize around 24th hour.Interesting fact is related to our results concerning C2-ceramide and C2-ceramide + PJ34 experiments on the fraction of proliferating cells, since it varies from the results obtained using the MTT assay. Our computational method suggests that PARP inhibition along with C2-ceramide supplementation results in lower proliferation abilities than in experiment without the inhibition. This fact was not detected in our MTT assay probably due to its limitations, as well as in the analogous experiment presented in [13].The predicted proportions for each sample are presented in Table1. What is worth emphasizing is the behaviour of replicates for given time and setting which is stable (i.e., average standard deviation ≈ 0.01).Table 1
The proportion of cells exhibiting specific molecular processes estimated by thessKL method.
(a)
Case study 1
K21
SKOV
Proliferation
0.518
0.518
0.525
0.408
0.415
0.396
Quiescence
0.482
0.482
0.475
0.592
0.585
0.604
(b)
Case study 2
6 h
Control
C2–cer
C2–cer + PJ34
Proliferation
0.521
0.526
0.525
0.458
0.458
0.469
0.404
0.423
0.422
Cell death
0.479
0.474
0.475
0.542
0.542
0.531
0.596
0.577
0.578


### 4.3. Functional Validation

The additional validation of our results was performed using the classical approach to the functional analysis of transcriptomic data. We intend to verify if profiles detected by application of the MPH method are consistent with general, average tendencies indicated by functional analysis tools. In order to identify molecular and cellular functions altered by treatments we performed core analysis using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis tool(IPA). The statistics for the most influenced functions reported in this section are listed in Table 2.Table 2
Levels of statistical significance of each molecular function that was detected byIPA in each case study.
Molecular function
Z-score
p value
CM-K21
Cell survival
3.264
1.08
E
-
22
Cell viability
3.196
3.84
E
-
20
Cell viability of tumor cell lines
3.312
1.63
E
-
11
Proliferation of carcinoma cell lines
1.292
1.86
E
-
07
Formation of cellular protrusions
−1.757
5.08
E
-
07
CM-SKOV3
Interphase
−2.656
1.46
E
-
14
M phase
−1.789
2.42
E
-
12
Differentiation
−1.278
4.52
E
-
07
Senescence
−0.978
2.65
E
-
06
Assembly of cells
1.534
1.20
E
-
07
Cell death
−0.437
5.56
E
-
24
Necrosis
−0.712
2
.
65
E
-
23
C2
Proliferation of cells
−2.520
4.97
E
-
11
Proliferation of cancer cells
−3.136
2.26
E
-
05
Apoptosis
2.039
2.07
E
-
04
C2 + PJ34
Proliferation of tumor cell lines
−0.760
7.34
E
-
09
Proliferation of neuronal cells
−1.808
4.70
E
-
08
Cell survival
−2.661
1.87
E
-
03
Proliferation of cells
−2.417
1.77
E
-
06
Necrosis
2.482
1.34
E
-
04
Cell death
3.338
6.48
E
-
03
Apoptosis
3.777
7.44
E
-
04Table 3
List of the functional marker genes that were used in the first case study.
Symbol
Name
Proliferation
CDC20
Cell Division Cycle 20
TK1
Thymidine Kinase 1
KNL1
Kinetochore Scaffold 1
CENPE
Centromere Protein E
STIL
SCL/TAL1 Interrupting Locus
ANLN
Anillin Actin Binding Protein
NDC1
NDC1 Transmembrane Nucleoporin
NUF2
Cell Division Cycle-Associated Protein 1
KIF20A
Kinesin Family Member 20A
PLK4
Polo Like Kinase 4
CCNB1
Cyclin B1
CCNA2
Cyclin A2
Quiescence
COL5A1
Collagen Type V Alpha 1 Chain
TGFBI
Transforming Growth Factor Beta Induced
TCEA2
Transcription Elongation Factor A2
WNT9A
Wnt Family Member 9A
MMP11
Matrix Metallopeptidase 11
LAMB1
Laminin Subunit Beta 1
KRT14
Keratin 14
LTBP1
Latent Transforming Growth Factor Beta Binding Protein 1
PHLDB1
Pleckstrin Homology Like Domain Family B Member 1
TIMP3
TIMP Metallopeptidase Inhibitor 3
LRP1
LDL Receptor Related Protein 1
COL18A1
Collagen Type XVIII Alpha 1 ChainTable 4
List of functional marker genes that were used in the second case study.
Symbol
Name
Cell death
DDIT3
DNA Damage Inducible Transcript 3
ERN1
Endoplasmic Reticulum To Nucleus Signaling 1
JUN
Jun Proto-Oncogene, AP-1 Transcription Factor Subunit
SQSTM1
Sequestosome 1
SMPD1
Sphingomyelin Phosphodiesterase 1
TGFB1
Transforming Growth Factor Beta 1
PRNP
Prion Protein
CEBPB
CCAAT/Enhancer Binding Protein Beta
NQO1
NAD(P)H Quinone Dehydrogenase 1
NR4A1
Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 4 Group A Member 1
CTSB
Cathepsin B
ZMAT3
Zinc Finger Matrin-Type 3
Proliferation
CD24
CD24 Molecule
NRP1
Neuropilin 1
TNS3
Tensin 3
MYC
V-Myc Avian Myelocytomatosis Viral Oncogene Homolog
CD38
CD38 Molecule
CCNA2
Cyclin A2
FGF7
Fibroblast Growth Factor 7
MST1R
Macrophage Stimulating 1 Receptor
MYCN
V-Myc Avian Myelocytomatosis Viral Oncogene Neuroblastoma Derived Homolog
ETS1
ETS Proto-Oncogene 1, Transcription Factor
EDNRA
Endothelin Receptor Type AIn the first case study we selected 3946 differentially expressed genes based onp value and cut off the number to 2238 based on the fold change. In the second case 3983 genes were selected for further analysis as distinguishing three experimental conditions, that is, control, C2-ceramide treated, and both C2-ceramide and PJ34 treated.For the cells treated with fibroblast enriched medium (CM-K21) in the first case study, the top molecular and cellular function detected bythe disease and function (IPA tool) wascellular growth and proliferation with 827 molecules involved. Within this cluster the highest activation was reported toproliferation of cells andcell proliferation of carcinoma cell lines. For the treatment with ovarian cancer enriched medium (CM-SKOV3), the most altered functions werecell death and survival andcell cycle, but in this case they were both reported as decreased. The representative clusters arecell death andM phase. The following top changed function wascellular development including downregulated clusters ofdifferentiations andsenescence. Clearly, the inhibition of cellular death, cell cycle, and differentiation indicate the cell quiescence.In the second case study IPA analysis revealed significant enrichment in thecellular growth and proliferation in both C2-ceramide and C2 with PJ34 treated cells and this category was on the second position aftercellular movement in C2 variant andcellular development. According to the p value in cells treated with C2 and PJ34proliferation of tumor cell lines was the first affected function andproliferation of neuronal cells was on the third position. In the C2-ceramide treated cellsproliferation of cells was on the second position. It should be emphasized that in both variants proliferation scored very low p value what indicates high data enrichment. On the basis of Z-score its activation was decreased in comparison to control samples. According to activation Z-score in C2-ceramide treated cells the highest decrease was designated for the functions related to theorganization of cytoskeleton andcytoplasm; howeverproliferation of cancer cells was the third decreased function. While increased activation was predicted for the functions asmorbidity or mortality andorganismal death,apoptosis was the fourth function. In the second experimental variant (C2-ceramide with PJ34) in the top of the relevant decreased functions were those related to cellular movement and development of neurons (e.g.,formation of cellular protrusions, development of neurons). However activation ofcell survival andproliferation of cells was predicted to be decreased in comparison to control cells. What is more, in this experimental variantnecrosis,cell death, andapoptosis were in the top of activated functions.On the basis of the above findings, we conclude that the effect of the C2-ceramide enhanced by the PARP inhibition affects the ability of cells to divide and cellular viability as well as genetically controlled reorganization of cellular shape. This intriguing discovery should be subjected to the further analysis.


### 4.4. New Marker Genes

In the last step of the MPH method we selected new markers which characterize cellular subpopulations of our interest. New markers were selected according to the top differences in genes involvement in the functional expression profiles supported by biological knowledge. In the ovarian cancer case study the method revealed the two additional genes characteristic for the cellular quiescence: PI16 and WNT7A. Peptidase inhibitor 16 (PI16) was reported to inhibit cell migration and proliferation and determine cellular quiescence [14]. WNT7A maintains stemness [15, 16] and exerts an antiproliferative effect [17, 18]. The top distinctive genes for the proliferation metaprofile include, besides previously used markers, numerous genes related to malignancy and ovarian cancer progression, in particular cytokines and their receptors: CXCL1, IL1A, CXCL8, IL1B, IL1R1, and IL1R2 [19–22].On the other hand neuroblastoma cells which entered the cell death pathway are characterized by activation of EGR1, VEGF, and GDF15. While the EGR1 is known to possess proapoptotic properties [23], VEGF and GDF15 are usually described as prosurvival proteins [24, 25]. Nevertheless, recently it was reported that overexpression of GDF15 (which is also observed in our experiment) induces apoptosis of breast cancer cells [26]. There is also some evidence that VEGF stimulates apoptosis through the ERK1/2 signaling pathway [27]. We believe that these three proteins provide unique markers for the ceramide induced death of the neural cancer cells.Top genes characterizing each functional profile determined by the MPH method are listed in AppendixD along with their raw expression levels and fold changes.


## 4.1. Marker Genes Selection

In order to assure the computational efficiency of used algorithmic solutions, we first reduce the number of analyzed genes. We use only genes that differentiate experimental conditions in a statistically significant way according to the two-sampleT-test with p value less than 0.05. Such filtering resulted in 3946 and 3983 genes, respectively, per case study, that were used in further decomposition analysis.According to the presented workflow, we first answered the question if samples’ profiles for such selected genes exhibit any specific inner structure. Application ofDSection algorithm determined a decomposition of the expression matrix. Taking into consideration the character of our experimental data and provided assays, in both our case studies we set the prior knowledge as a uniform proportion of two functional subpopulations.In each case study, annotation of the genes that differentiate well between two obtained profiles (i.e., top 500 genes with the highest fold change) was performed using DAVID tool [10, 12]. It provides groups of marker genes characteristic for each profile based on the functional enrichment analysis. This classification was systematically verified using literature reports on each gene function. For the subsequent analysis only genes known to enhance particular process were selected.In the first case study we end up with the marker genes for (i) the proliferation activity composed of 12 genes, CDC20, TK1, KNL1, CENPE, STIL, ANLN, NDC1, NUF2, KIF20A, PLK4, CCNB1, and CCNA2, and (ii) the quiescence state composed of 12 genes: COL5A1, TGFBI, TCEA2, WNT9A, MMP11, LAMB1, KRT14, LTBP1, PHLDB1, TIMP3, LRP1, and COL18A1.On the other hand, in the second case the following marker genes are described: (i) proliferation regulation including 11 genes, CD24, NRP1, TNS3, MYC, CD38, CCNA2, FGF7, MST1R, MYCN, ETS1, and EDNRA, and (ii) cell death related regulation including 12 genes: DDIT3, ERN1, JUN, SQSTM1, SMPD1, TGFB1, PRNP, CEBPB, NQO1, NR4A1, CTSB, and ZMAT3.The expression patterns of all selected marker genes can be investigated in Figure2, while their full names are given in Appendix B (Tables 3 and 4). Additionally, we have performed a bunch of tests to detect how the outcome of the MPH method is dependent on the number of marker genes used in the ssKL step. It turned out that a set of 10–12 genes is sufficient to keep the percentage results robust. Moreover, we verified how the average fold change of selected marker genes influences the final predicted proportions in the ssKL algorithm; see Appendix C.Figure 2
Expression patterns of marker genes for each case study. The (a) panel describes 12 genes that regulate proliferation and 12 genes that regulate maintenance/survival functions. On the other hand, the (b) panel describes 12 genes related to positive regulation of the cell death processes (blue stripe) and 11 genes related to positive regulation of proliferation mechanisms (red stripe).
(a)
Case study 1
(b)
Case study 2


## 4.2. Estimation of Functional Heterogeneity

During the next phase, the obtained marker genes sets were used forssKL method to predict the final proportion of different cell activities in the analyzed samples. In both case studies we observed significant differences in fractions of cells exhibiting investigated behaviours (see Figure 3).Figure 3
The comparison of the experimental results (left) with the theoretical estimation of functional proportions in subpopulations (right) for both analyzed case studies: (a) compares proliferation activity in the 48th hour of SKOV3 experiment; (b) compares behaviour in the 6th hour of the SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma experiment.
(a)
Case study 1
(b)
Case study 2In order to validate presented methods and significance of their outcomes we have performed the log-likelihood ratio test. It was measured how much the complex model with more degrees of freedom (assuming functionally heterogeneous population) fits the data better than the hypothesis assuming homogeneous population (H0). In each experimental condition H0 was rejected in favor of H1 (see Appendix C).In most of the analyzed experimental variants our results were consistent with the results of biological assays and the literature based predictions. Our analysis indicate that secretion products of both SKOV3 cells and the fibroblast cell line K21 are able to activate cellular proliferation. However, the effect of stromal cells is much more pronounced. The results of predictions based on MPH method have been completely confirmed by Resazurin Reduction Assay.Concerning the neuroblastoma cell line we have shown that in the control environment the fraction of proliferating cells is higher than in both experimental conditions, which was expected and consistent with MTT assay. Moreover, we observe that the reaction to external treatment is the strongest in the 6-hour time frame and seems to stabilize around 24th hour.Interesting fact is related to our results concerning C2-ceramide and C2-ceramide + PJ34 experiments on the fraction of proliferating cells, since it varies from the results obtained using the MTT assay. Our computational method suggests that PARP inhibition along with C2-ceramide supplementation results in lower proliferation abilities than in experiment without the inhibition. This fact was not detected in our MTT assay probably due to its limitations, as well as in the analogous experiment presented in [13].The predicted proportions for each sample are presented in Table1. What is worth emphasizing is the behaviour of replicates for given time and setting which is stable (i.e., average standard deviation ≈ 0.01).Table 1
The proportion of cells exhibiting specific molecular processes estimated by thessKL method.
(a)
Case study 1
K21
SKOV
Proliferation
0.518
0.518
0.525
0.408
0.415
0.396
Quiescence
0.482
0.482
0.475
0.592
0.585
0.604
(b)
Case study 2
6 h
Control
C2–cer
C2–cer + PJ34
Proliferation
0.521
0.526
0.525
0.458
0.458
0.469
0.404
0.423
0.422
Cell death
0.479
0.474
0.475
0.542
0.542
0.531
0.596
0.577
0.578


## 4.3. Functional Validation

The additional validation of our results was performed using the classical approach to the functional analysis of transcriptomic data. We intend to verify if profiles detected by application of the MPH method are consistent with general, average tendencies indicated by functional analysis tools. In order to identify molecular and cellular functions altered by treatments we performed core analysis using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis tool(IPA). The statistics for the most influenced functions reported in this section are listed in Table 2.Table 2
Levels of statistical significance of each molecular function that was detected byIPA in each case study.
Molecular function
Z-score
p value
CM-K21
Cell survival
3.264
1.08
E
-
22
Cell viability
3.196
3.84
E
-
20
Cell viability of tumor cell lines
3.312
1.63
E
-
11
Proliferation of carcinoma cell lines
1.292
1.86
E
-
07
Formation of cellular protrusions
−1.757
5.08
E
-
07
CM-SKOV3
Interphase
−2.656
1.46
E
-
14
M phase
−1.789
2.42
E
-
12
Differentiation
−1.278
4.52
E
-
07
Senescence
−0.978
2.65
E
-
06
Assembly of cells
1.534
1.20
E
-
07
Cell death
−0.437
5.56
E
-
24
Necrosis
−0.712
2
.
65
E
-
23
C2
Proliferation of cells
−2.520
4.97
E
-
11
Proliferation of cancer cells
−3.136
2.26
E
-
05
Apoptosis
2.039
2.07
E
-
04
C2 + PJ34
Proliferation of tumor cell lines
−0.760
7.34
E
-
09
Proliferation of neuronal cells
−1.808
4.70
E
-
08
Cell survival
−2.661
1.87
E
-
03
Proliferation of cells
−2.417
1.77
E
-
06
Necrosis
2.482
1.34
E
-
04
Cell death
3.338
6.48
E
-
03
Apoptosis
3.777
7.44
E
-
04Table 3
List of the functional marker genes that were used in the first case study.
Symbol
Name
Proliferation
CDC20
Cell Division Cycle 20
TK1
Thymidine Kinase 1
KNL1
Kinetochore Scaffold 1
CENPE
Centromere Protein E
STIL
SCL/TAL1 Interrupting Locus
ANLN
Anillin Actin Binding Protein
NDC1
NDC1 Transmembrane Nucleoporin
NUF2
Cell Division Cycle-Associated Protein 1
KIF20A
Kinesin Family Member 20A
PLK4
Polo Like Kinase 4
CCNB1
Cyclin B1
CCNA2
Cyclin A2
Quiescence
COL5A1
Collagen Type V Alpha 1 Chain
TGFBI
Transforming Growth Factor Beta Induced
TCEA2
Transcription Elongation Factor A2
WNT9A
Wnt Family Member 9A
MMP11
Matrix Metallopeptidase 11
LAMB1
Laminin Subunit Beta 1
KRT14
Keratin 14
LTBP1
Latent Transforming Growth Factor Beta Binding Protein 1
PHLDB1
Pleckstrin Homology Like Domain Family B Member 1
TIMP3
TIMP Metallopeptidase Inhibitor 3
LRP1
LDL Receptor Related Protein 1
COL18A1
Collagen Type XVIII Alpha 1 ChainTable 4
List of functional marker genes that were used in the second case study.
Symbol
Name
Cell death
DDIT3
DNA Damage Inducible Transcript 3
ERN1
Endoplasmic Reticulum To Nucleus Signaling 1
JUN
Jun Proto-Oncogene, AP-1 Transcription Factor Subunit
SQSTM1
Sequestosome 1
SMPD1
Sphingomyelin Phosphodiesterase 1
TGFB1
Transforming Growth Factor Beta 1
PRNP
Prion Protein
CEBPB
CCAAT/Enhancer Binding Protein Beta
NQO1
NAD(P)H Quinone Dehydrogenase 1
NR4A1
Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 4 Group A Member 1
CTSB
Cathepsin B
ZMAT3
Zinc Finger Matrin-Type 3
Proliferation
CD24
CD24 Molecule
NRP1
Neuropilin 1
TNS3
Tensin 3
MYC
V-Myc Avian Myelocytomatosis Viral Oncogene Homolog
CD38
CD38 Molecule
CCNA2
Cyclin A2
FGF7
Fibroblast Growth Factor 7
MST1R
Macrophage Stimulating 1 Receptor
MYCN
V-Myc Avian Myelocytomatosis Viral Oncogene Neuroblastoma Derived Homolog
ETS1
ETS Proto-Oncogene 1, Transcription Factor
EDNRA
Endothelin Receptor Type AIn the first case study we selected 3946 differentially expressed genes based onp value and cut off the number to 2238 based on the fold change. In the second case 3983 genes were selected for further analysis as distinguishing three experimental conditions, that is, control, C2-ceramide treated, and both C2-ceramide and PJ34 treated.For the cells treated with fibroblast enriched medium (CM-K21) in the first case study, the top molecular and cellular function detected bythe disease and function (IPA tool) wascellular growth and proliferation with 827 molecules involved. Within this cluster the highest activation was reported toproliferation of cells andcell proliferation of carcinoma cell lines. For the treatment with ovarian cancer enriched medium (CM-SKOV3), the most altered functions werecell death and survival andcell cycle, but in this case they were both reported as decreased. The representative clusters arecell death andM phase. The following top changed function wascellular development including downregulated clusters ofdifferentiations andsenescence. Clearly, the inhibition of cellular death, cell cycle, and differentiation indicate the cell quiescence.In the second case study IPA analysis revealed significant enrichment in thecellular growth and proliferation in both C2-ceramide and C2 with PJ34 treated cells and this category was on the second position aftercellular movement in C2 variant andcellular development. According to the p value in cells treated with C2 and PJ34proliferation of tumor cell lines was the first affected function andproliferation of neuronal cells was on the third position. In the C2-ceramide treated cellsproliferation of cells was on the second position. It should be emphasized that in both variants proliferation scored very low p value what indicates high data enrichment. On the basis of Z-score its activation was decreased in comparison to control samples. According to activation Z-score in C2-ceramide treated cells the highest decrease was designated for the functions related to theorganization of cytoskeleton andcytoplasm; howeverproliferation of cancer cells was the third decreased function. While increased activation was predicted for the functions asmorbidity or mortality andorganismal death,apoptosis was the fourth function. In the second experimental variant (C2-ceramide with PJ34) in the top of the relevant decreased functions were those related to cellular movement and development of neurons (e.g.,formation of cellular protrusions, development of neurons). However activation ofcell survival andproliferation of cells was predicted to be decreased in comparison to control cells. What is more, in this experimental variantnecrosis,cell death, andapoptosis were in the top of activated functions.On the basis of the above findings, we conclude that the effect of the C2-ceramide enhanced by the PARP inhibition affects the ability of cells to divide and cellular viability as well as genetically controlled reorganization of cellular shape. This intriguing discovery should be subjected to the further analysis.


## 4.4. New Marker Genes

In the last step of the MPH method we selected new markers which characterize cellular subpopulations of our interest. New markers were selected according to the top differences in genes involvement in the functional expression profiles supported by biological knowledge. In the ovarian cancer case study the method revealed the two additional genes characteristic for the cellular quiescence: PI16 and WNT7A. Peptidase inhibitor 16 (PI16) was reported to inhibit cell migration and proliferation and determine cellular quiescence [14]. WNT7A maintains stemness [15, 16] and exerts an antiproliferative effect [17, 18]. The top distinctive genes for the proliferation metaprofile include, besides previously used markers, numerous genes related to malignancy and ovarian cancer progression, in particular cytokines and their receptors: CXCL1, IL1A, CXCL8, IL1B, IL1R1, and IL1R2 [19–22].On the other hand neuroblastoma cells which entered the cell death pathway are characterized by activation of EGR1, VEGF, and GDF15. While the EGR1 is known to possess proapoptotic properties [23], VEGF and GDF15 are usually described as prosurvival proteins [24, 25]. Nevertheless, recently it was reported that overexpression of GDF15 (which is also observed in our experiment) induces apoptosis of breast cancer cells [26]. There is also some evidence that VEGF stimulates apoptosis through the ERK1/2 signaling pathway [27]. We believe that these three proteins provide unique markers for the ceramide induced death of the neural cancer cells.Top genes characterizing each functional profile determined by the MPH method are listed in AppendixD along with their raw expression levels and fold changes.


## 5. Discussion

In this article, we propose a novel approach to the analysis of transcriptomic data from cellularly homogeneous samples aiming to describe their functional heterogeneity. The main innovation of our idea is based on the assumption that in a population of cells each individual cell conducts its own molecular function. Moreover, each cell in the population may respond in a different way to an external stimuli. These observations resulted in the development of the MPH method that estimates the proportion of cell subpopulations conducting specific cellular functions along with their transcriptomic description.The above description of our results proves that our function characteristic profiles derived from the computational interpretation of transcriptomic data are functionally consistent. We have concluded that they actually correspond to the molecular subpopulations of both ovarian cancer and neuroblastoma cells that were studied.Ovarian Cancer Cell Line. Based on the literature, both healthy fibroblasts (K21) and ovarian cancer cell line (SKOV3) were expected to boost cancer cells proliferation via paracrine manner. We found that conditioned media were sufficient to trigger ovarian cancer cell divisions regardless of serum depletion. Bothin vitro experiments and microarray analysis prove that fibroblasts stimulate proliferation extensively, while ovarian cancer secreted factors exert a more subtle effect. This is consistent with the metaprofile results showing that percentage of proliferating cells is significantly higher in the culture with fibroblasts enriched medium. Thein vitro experiments support the hypothesis that fibroblasts stimulate proliferation extensively, while ovarian cancer secreted factors exert a more subtle effect. These results are fully consistent with the conclusions based on the output provided by the MPH method. Based on the transcriptomic profiles we identified two cellular activities in the analyzed sample, that is, proliferation and quiescence, while the calculated proportions show that the percentage of proliferating cells is significantly higher in the culture with fibroblasts enriched medium.The core analysis (IPA tool) of the significantly altered genes revealed the activation of cell cycle related genes in the CM-K21 condition. In parallel, in CM-SKOV3 treatment, we observe downregulation of differentiation, proliferation, senescence, and cell death suggesting cell dormancy. Although proliferation was clearly determined in both the first functional profile from the MPH algorithm and the raw transcriptomic data, the opposite process was not automatically defined. None of the commonly used programs (DAVID, IPA, Molgen) managed to identify dormancy or cell quiescence. However, 8 out of 12 of the most differentiating genes for the second functional profile were linked to quiescence in various studies. The MPH method requires manual analysis, but it allows more profound insight and identification of the nontrivial processes and corresponding markers.In order to additionally verify the outcome of the MPH method for the ovarian cancer case study we have selected the third group of genes related to the cell signaling processes. It turned out that the final proportions are consistent with the two subpopulations case and the method predicts relatively low level of signaling activity (see AppendixE).Neuroblastoma Cell Line. Similarly, in the second case study the MPH results support the C2-ceramide related hypotheses based on the literature. Both experimental and computational experiments confirm that in the presence of C2-ceramide the cell death processes increase their activity and the fraction of proliferating cells is lower than in the control sample. The same trends were detected between the control and second experimental condition (C2-ceramide + PJ34). The control sample manifests higher proliferation activities and repressed cell death processes. However, our computational analysis suggests that the PARP inhibitor (PJ34) does not increase the cell viability in populations supplied with the C2-ceramide. This fact is not consistent with the results from the MTT assay reported in [13].However, since the functional analysis provided in the results section supports our computational results we suppose that the cause for this inconsistence may be the assay used to measure cells viability. The MTT assay depends on concentration and activity of NAD(P)H-dependent cellular enzymes [28], while PARP actively reduces the concentration of NAD(P)H [29]. We suspect that the discrepancy between the results of the MPH method and the MTT assay may result from PARP dependent changes in NAD(P)H balance or PARP related silencing of cellular oxidative stress or might have other unknown causes. We suggest further verification of PJ34 effect on ceramide induced cell death.Summarizing, in both case studies the MPH method provides insightful interpretation of transcriptomic data, which is consistent with literature and functional analysis performed byIPA tools. However, in addition it expands our knowledge on the composition of the measured transcriptomic signal by the microarray experiments. We approximate the differences in gene expression levels for cells performing various molecular process and the proportions in which they are mixed.The successful functional validation justifies the applicability of the proposed novel approach to the analysis of transcriptomic data retrieved from homogeneous samples. We illustrate that the methods, used previously at the cellular level to determine the input of each cell-type on the finally observed transcriptome, can be applied to the problem of a subcellular, regulatory nature. The method itself is stable and computationally efficient and provides statistically significant outcome.Finally, it should be noted that methods that engage the nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) techniques are also applicable in case of RNA-seq data analysis. Various modifications of NMF have been lately used for the inference from the RNA-seq results. For simple detection of the most differentiating genes between experimental and control ones, a method called discriminant NMF (DNMF) was suggested. The DNMF incorporates the Fisher’s criterion into NMF by maximizing the distance among any samples from different experimental conditions, meanwhile minimizing the dispersion between any pairs of samples in the same class [30].Additionally, the already presentedDSection method was used by Dozmorov et al. [31] to describe the contribution of different cell types in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) pathogenesis where transcriptomic data were provided from RNA-seq experiments. Also, it should be mentioned that apart from the NMF there are other approaches to determination of cell-specific transcriptome, for example, quadratic programming approach suggested by Gong et al. [32]. Nevertheless, none of these techniques were used to attempt the subcellular task that we address in this paper. That is why we believe that the MPH approach not only is novel, but also highlights the fact that transcriptome analysis usually is based on multilevel assumptions and simplifications, which may obfuscate some subtle facts important in many biomedical aspects (e.g., diagnosis, drug resistance).


## 6. Conclusions

In this study we presented a novel methodological approach to quantify the functional heterogeneity of a homogeneous cell population based on transcriptomic data. To this aim we adopted the method proposed for quantification of cell proportions in heterogeneous tissue samples (e.g., mixed tissues) from expression data. Our model framework exploits the methodology designed for RNA expression microarrays applied for heterogeneous tissues. However, it should be emphasized that our novel approach can also be effectively applied to RNA-seq data by adapting the procedures proposed in [33, 34].The presented case studies were focused on the effect of peritoneal paracrine signaling in ovarian cancer cells and the role of ceramide in mediating cell death in neuroblastoma cells. With the MPH method, in the ovarian cancer study, we identified two cellular activities, that is, proliferation and quiescence mixed in the proportion consistent with the experimental data. Our computational method also quantified the activity of C2-ceramide in time and its influence on cell metabolic activity in a consistent way with the MTT assay. Finally, the method allowed obtaining biologically relevant results describing the biologically meaningful interdependence between C2-ceramide and the PJ34 compound. In this case the specificity of molecular experiment requires the use of additional methods to verify the results of the MTT assay referring to cells viability.Here, it should be mentioned that the presented framework could be further improved. BothDSection and ssKL procedures are characterized by the bias towards discrimination based mainly on fold changes in a given expression dataset. One should note that in the current implementation the ssKL method prevents the use of markers that differ on the direction of expression changes. The appropriate improvement of the decomposition method can constitute a very useful strategy for further research.



---

*Source: 6961786-2017-12-06.xml*