# Impact of Layer-by-Layer Self-Assembly Clay-Based Nanocoating on Flame Retardant Properties of Sisal Fiber Cellulose Microcrystals

Authors: Chun Wei; Sihua Zeng; Yuyuan Tan; Wu Wang; Jian Lv; Hongxia Liu
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

The renewable cationic polyelectrolyte chitosan (CH) and anionic nanomontmorillonite (MMT) layers were alternately deposited on the surface of sisal fiber cellulose microcrystals (SFCM) via layer-by-layer (LBL) self-assembly method. The structure and properties of the composites were characterized by zeta potential, thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR), microcalorimeter (MCC), and so forth. The zeta potential results show that the cellulose microcrystalline surface charge reversed due to the adsorption of CH and MMT nanoplatelets during multilayer deposition. MMT characteristic diffraction peaks appear in XRD patterns of SFCM(CH/MMT)5 and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 composites. Additionally, FESEM reveals that the SFCM(CH/MMT)10 surface is covered with a layer of material containing Si, which has been verified by elemental analysis. TGA results show that the initial decomposition (weight loss of 5%) temperature of SFCM(CH/MMT)5 is increased by 4°C compared to that of pure SFCM. On the other hand, carbon residue percentage of SFCM(CH/MMT)10 is 25.1%, higher than that of pure SFCM (5.4%) by 19.7%. Eventually, it is testified by MCC measurement that CH/MMT coating can significantly reinforce the flame retardant performance of SFCM.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Cellulose is the most abundant natural renewable resource [1, 2] and has been recently concerned and developed as raw material with the gradual depletion of oil resources and increasing emphasis on environment-friendliness, green materials, and sustainable development. However, these natural fibers have properties of facile thermal degradation and flammability, which limit its application in many fields. Hence, it is necessary to effectively modify cellulose to improve the heat resistance and flame resistance of natural fibers, especially polymer-based reinforced natural fiber composite [3, 4].Layer-by-layer self-assembly (LBL) is a rapidly developed simple and versatile surface modification method in the 90s of the last century [5, 6]. This facile method can be performed in mild reaction conditions, without limitations of the size and shape of substrate, and it has other advantages: flexible film composition and controllable thickness, stable film performance, and so forth. Thanks to these properties, multilayer films with different characteristics, such as hydrophobicity [7, 8], controlled drug release [9, 10], chemical sensing [11, 12], antibacterial property [13, 14], and flame resistance [15–17], can be built through this method.Montmorillonite (MMT) is typical layered silicate clay consisting of two Si–O tetrahedrals and a layer of Al–O octahedron amid them. Because partial Al3+ cation within the octahedron are replaced by Mg2+ and others, the surface negative charge among montmorillonite layers is excess, resulting in the fact that Na+, Ca2+, and other cations are readily absorbed onto montmorillonite layers to maintain the charge balance itself. The unique layered structure and excellent heat resistance of MMT make it widely used in the preparation of brand-new high-performance polymer/clay nanocomposites [18]. Compared with conventional filled polymers, MMT can improve mechanical properties [19], gas barrier properties, solvent resistance, and heat resistance of the polymer matrix [20], and a potential flame retardant capacity [21] might be existent.In this study, a strategy of using sisal fiber cellulose microcrystal (SFCM) as a substrate and alternately adsorbing positively charged polyelectrolyte chitosan (CH) and negatively charged inorganic nanolayer MMT onto the surface of SFCM via LBL technique has been proposed. The effect of CH/MMT coating on the thermal performance and flame retardant properties of SFCM was systematically investigated, aiming at applying SFCM to high-performance composite materials.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Materials

Sisal fibers were obtained from Guangxi Sisal Company, China. Chitosan (medium viscosity of 200–400 mPa·S) was purchased from Aladdin Reagent Company. Sodium MMT clay was provided by Zhejiang Fenghong New Materials Co., Ltd., with an average size of 1180 nm. Acetic acid (AR) with a hydrochloric acid (AR) and sulfuric acid (AR) was obtained from Xilong Chemical Co. Both deionized water and sisal fiber microcrystalline cellulose (SFCM) were homemade [22]; SFCM is a rod-like structure with a diameter of about 10 μm and a length of about 50–150 um.


### 2.2. Layer-by-Layer Self-Assembly Method

SFCM charging process is as follows. SFCM was added to an aqueous H2SO4 solution with a concentration of 45%, and the mixture was then stirred under 50°C for 2 min before it was filtered and washed for 4 times. The precipitation was dried at 50°C.MMT solution preparation is as follows. 5 g of montmorillonite powder was dissolved in 1000 mL of distilled water by vigorous agitation. The suspension was placed at room temperature for 24 h of swelling, and then it was processed with ultrasonic sound generated from an ultrasonic cleaner for 3 h. After centrifugation, at a rate of 8000 rad/min for 5 min, with a high speed centrifuge, the upper clear liquid was collected. SFCMs were alternately adsorbed positively charged polyelectrolyte chitosan (CH) and negatively charged inorganic nanolayer MMT onto the surface of SFCM via LBL technique, as shown in Figure1.Figure 1
Layer-by-layer self-assembly process of SFCM(CH/MMT)n.


### 2.3. Preparation of SFCM(CH/MMT)n Composites

0.5 g of sulfuric acid-treated SFCM was thoroughly dispersed in 100 mL of CH solution (0.2 wt%, containing 1 v/v% of acetic acid), which was then magnetically stirred for 10 min. Afterwards, wash and vacuum filtration were alternatively performed for 4 times using 1 v/v% of acetic acid solution (dissolved in deionized water). Then, the solid was dispersed into 100 mL of MMT solution (pH not adjusted) and then magnetically stirred for 30 min. After being washed in deionized water for four times, sample was tested for zeta potential measurement. Similarly, SFCM(CH/MMT)n composite materials (n
=
1, 5, and 10, resp.) were prepared for the following characterizations.


### 2.4. Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra were taken on a Holland PANalytical X-Pert PRO X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation from 3°~40°. Zeta potential was determined using a Zetasizer Nano ZS90 nanoparticle size and zeta potential analyzer (Malvern Company, British). Thermal gravimetric (TGA) test, for the weight loss curve ranging from 50 to 700°C, was conducted by a NETZSCH STA-449C thermal gravimetric analyzer (NETZSCH Company, Germany) at a heating rate of 10°C/min under the nitrogen. Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was obtained using a NICOLETNEXUS 470 FT-IR spectrometer (Perkin-Elmer Company, United States), and samples were prepared using KBr for flaking. Field emission electron microscopy (FESEM) was operated using a Hitachi S-4800 field emission scanning electron microscope provided by Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation. Microscale combustion calorimetry (MCC) was conducted using an MCC-2 (Govmark, Farmingdale, NY) microscale combustion calorimeter, and the sample was heated from 100 to 700°C with a heating rate of 1°C/s under the nitrogen atmosphere, and samples are decomposed anaerobically to release volatile combustible gases under high temperatures, which can be combusted in N2/O2 (8 : 2) atmosphere.


## 2.1. Materials

Sisal fibers were obtained from Guangxi Sisal Company, China. Chitosan (medium viscosity of 200–400 mPa·S) was purchased from Aladdin Reagent Company. Sodium MMT clay was provided by Zhejiang Fenghong New Materials Co., Ltd., with an average size of 1180 nm. Acetic acid (AR) with a hydrochloric acid (AR) and sulfuric acid (AR) was obtained from Xilong Chemical Co. Both deionized water and sisal fiber microcrystalline cellulose (SFCM) were homemade [22]; SFCM is a rod-like structure with a diameter of about 10 μm and a length of about 50–150 um.


## 2.2. Layer-by-Layer Self-Assembly Method

SFCM charging process is as follows. SFCM was added to an aqueous H2SO4 solution with a concentration of 45%, and the mixture was then stirred under 50°C for 2 min before it was filtered and washed for 4 times. The precipitation was dried at 50°C.MMT solution preparation is as follows. 5 g of montmorillonite powder was dissolved in 1000 mL of distilled water by vigorous agitation. The suspension was placed at room temperature for 24 h of swelling, and then it was processed with ultrasonic sound generated from an ultrasonic cleaner for 3 h. After centrifugation, at a rate of 8000 rad/min for 5 min, with a high speed centrifuge, the upper clear liquid was collected. SFCMs were alternately adsorbed positively charged polyelectrolyte chitosan (CH) and negatively charged inorganic nanolayer MMT onto the surface of SFCM via LBL technique, as shown in Figure1.Figure 1
Layer-by-layer self-assembly process of SFCM(CH/MMT)n.


## 2.3. Preparation of SFCM(CH/MMT)n Composites

0.5 g of sulfuric acid-treated SFCM was thoroughly dispersed in 100 mL of CH solution (0.2 wt%, containing 1 v/v% of acetic acid), which was then magnetically stirred for 10 min. Afterwards, wash and vacuum filtration were alternatively performed for 4 times using 1 v/v% of acetic acid solution (dissolved in deionized water). Then, the solid was dispersed into 100 mL of MMT solution (pH not adjusted) and then magnetically stirred for 30 min. After being washed in deionized water for four times, sample was tested for zeta potential measurement. Similarly, SFCM(CH/MMT)n composite materials (n
=
1, 5, and 10, resp.) were prepared for the following characterizations.


## 2.4. Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra were taken on a Holland PANalytical X-Pert PRO X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation from 3°~40°. Zeta potential was determined using a Zetasizer Nano ZS90 nanoparticle size and zeta potential analyzer (Malvern Company, British). Thermal gravimetric (TGA) test, for the weight loss curve ranging from 50 to 700°C, was conducted by a NETZSCH STA-449C thermal gravimetric analyzer (NETZSCH Company, Germany) at a heating rate of 10°C/min under the nitrogen. Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was obtained using a NICOLETNEXUS 470 FT-IR spectrometer (Perkin-Elmer Company, United States), and samples were prepared using KBr for flaking. Field emission electron microscopy (FESEM) was operated using a Hitachi S-4800 field emission scanning electron microscope provided by Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation. Microscale combustion calorimetry (MCC) was conducted using an MCC-2 (Govmark, Farmingdale, NY) microscale combustion calorimeter, and the sample was heated from 100 to 700°C with a heating rate of 1°C/s under the nitrogen atmosphere, and samples are decomposed anaerobically to release volatile combustible gases under high temperatures, which can be combusted in N2/O2 (8 : 2) atmosphere.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Impact of CH/MMT Coating on SFCM Zeta Potential

Zeta potential online monitoring can be used to characterize the dynamic adsorption of chitosan and montmorillonite suspensions on SFCM surface. The residual CH and MMT solution would affect the zeta potential of the samples, so we can confirm that the measurement of the zeta potential of SFCM/(CH/MMT)n adsorption was acted after the samples have been washed in deionized water for some time in order to remove the residual of the CH or MMT.Figure2 shows that the adsorption of each CH/MMT layer will turn the negative (or positive) potential into a positive (or negative) one. This potential reverse indicates that CH/MMT has been assembled to SFCM surface. Further, as the number of adsorption layers increases, absolute amount of the surface zeta charges becomes gradually smaller. This is probably because the MMT clay layer deposited on cellulose surface formed a relatively flat deposition surface where there are less nanotopological structures [23] compared with the pure polymer electrolyte self-assembly, so that less polymer chains will be deposited on this plane, resulting in the declined absolute amount of surface zeta charges as above mentioned.Figure 2
Changes of zeta potential at alternative absorption steps of CH and MMT.


### 3.2. Effect of CH/MMT Coating on SFCM Composite Crystal Structure

For further describing the assembly of CH/MMT coating on SFCM surface, XRD was carried out to characterize pure MMT, SFCM, SFCM(CH/MMT)5, and SFCM(CH/MMT)10. As shown in Figure 3, between small angles 3° and 10°, an MMT diffraction peak corresponding to pure MMT at 2θ = 6.8° occurs. According to the Bragg equation (2dsinθ =nλ), pure MMT interplanar spacing is 13.1 Å, whereas an MMT diffraction peak of SFCM(CH/MMT)5 and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 appears where 2θ = 4.8° and 5.0°, which has not been observed in the pattern of pure SFCM. Compared to pure MMT, MMT diffraction peak of SFCM(CH/MMT)5 and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 is shifted to a smaller angle. It is elucidated from the peak shift toward small angle that the interplanar spacing of MMT in CH/MMT nanocoating layer is larger than that in pure MMT. The reason might be that CH amid MMT sheets or the peeling of MMT layer during sonication process increases the distance between layers, which is consistent with Li et al.’s report [24]. Exceptionally, peaks intensity corresponding to SFCM(CH/MMT)5 and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 is much weaker than the peak intensity of pure MMT. The reason might be the following: the absorbed MMT has a low content and fewer deposition layers, and thus the CH/MMT coating is so thin that MMT layered structure, within the coating, cannot be converted from amorphousness into ordered structure [15].Figure 3
X-ray diffraction patterns of pure MMT, pure SFCM, SFCM(CH/MMT)5, and SFCM(CH/MMT)10.


### 3.3. Influence of CH/MMT Coating on Thermal Properties of SFCM

To clarify the impact of CH/MMT nanocoating on thermal performance of SFCM, pure SFCM and SFCM(CH/MMT)n composites (n
=
1, 5, and 10) were tested by TGA analysis (Figure 4). Before 340°C, TGA curves of SFCM, before and after treatment, are almost the same. The characteristic thermal parameters selected were the temperature for 5% and 10% weight loss. The results are summarized in Table 1. Table 1 shows that thermal properties of the treated SFCM are slightly better than those of untreated SFCM. At a weight loss of 10%, compared with pure SFCM, decomposition temperatures of SFCM(CH/MMT)1, SFCM(CH/MMT)5, and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 composites are elevated by 3, 4, and 3°C, respectively. On the other hand, between 340 and 700°C, it is found that the char yield of coated SFCM(CH/MMT)n is higher than that of pure SFCM. Moreover, as adsorption layers increase, char yield rises as well. At 700°C, compared with pure SFCM, char yields of SFCM(CH/MMT)1, SFCM(CH/MMT)5, and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 are increased by 9.6%, 12.0%, and 19.7%, respectively. This increase may be ascribed to the nanolayer of MMT that forms a sheet of carbon residue covering the surface of cellulose during heating process, because of which heat was insulated, protecting an amount of cellulose microcrystals from destruction.Table 1
TGA results for SFCM coated with different number of CH/MMT bilayers.
Samples
Temperature at  5 wt% loss (°C)
Temperature at  10 wt% loss (°C)
Residue (wt%)
SFCM
299
312
5.4
SFCM(CH/MMT)1
302
315
15.0
SFCM(CH/MMT)5 SFCM(CH/MMT)10
303300
316315
17.425.1Figure 4
TGA plots of SFCM coated with different number of CH/MMT bilayers.


### 3.4. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Analysis

Carbon residue, after TGA test, of pure SFCM, SFCM(CH/MMT)5, and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 was subjected to FTIR testing. As it is shown in Figure 5, for TGA residual carbon of SFCM(CH/MMT)10, stretching vibration peaks corresponding to methyl and methylene on cellulose appeared at 2970 and 2925 cm−1 [25], while these peaks of pure SFCM and SFCM(CH/MMT)5 are almost negligible. This implies that, with the increase of CH/MMT layers, cellulose microcrystals was protected in the process of thermal degradation. In addition, there is another peak at 1050 cm−1 for TG residual carbon of SFCM(CH/MMT)5 and SFCM(CH/MMT)10, which may be Si–O–Si stretching vibration peak of MMT or stretching vibration absorption peak of the cellulose C–C skeleton, indicating that the TG residual carbon of SFCM(CH/MMT)10 might be composed of cellulose microcrystalline and MMT [26].Figure 5
FTIR spectra of char residues of pure SFCM, SFCM(CH/MMT)5, and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 (charred in N2 at 700°C).


### 3.5. Morphology and Surface Element Analysis of SFCM and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 Composite

Field emission scanning electron micrographs of pure SFCM (Figure6(a)) and its TGA carbon residue (Figure 6(c)) and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 (Figure 6(b)) and its TGA carbon residue (Figure 6(d)) are given. It can be observed that the surface of pure SFCM is continuous cellulose structure with clear texture, clean surface, and regular structure, whereas the cellulose surface is coated with fold-like layers in Figure 6(b) and it is unable to clearly see continuous and clear-textured cellulose skeleton. For this reason, surface element analysis for pure SFCM and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 samples was shown in Figures 7(a) and 7(b). Figure 7(a) verifies the presence of elements C and O on the surface of pure SFCM without Si. However, in Figure 7(b), besides C and O, Si, Mg, Al, and other elements were also detected on the surface of SFCM(CH/MMT)10, demonstrating that the fold layers in Figure 6(b) should be MMT nanolayers.Figure 6
FESEM images of (a) pure SFCM, (b) SFCM(CH/MMT)10, and (c) char residues of pure SFCM and (d) SFCM(CH/MMT)10 (charred in N2 at 700°C).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure 7
Superficial elemental distribution of (a) pure SFCM and (b) SFCM(CH/MMT)10.
(a)
(b)Clear spiral contraction texture of pure SFCM can be observed in Figure6(c), and this is because of the severe contraction of cellulose during heating process. On the other hand, composite SFCM(CH/MMT)10 surface shrinkage has been significantly weakened, and this may be due to a thermal insulation coke layer which was formed during the heating of CH/MMT coating. This layer has satisfying insulation properties, inhibiting the heat from being transferred to the internal cellulose, that is, a protective effect.


### 3.6. Impact of CH/MMT Coating on Flame Retardant Performance of SFCM

To study the effect of CH/MMT on combustion properties of pure SFCM, SFCM(CH/MMT)5, and SFCM(CH/MMT)10, powder samples were tested through microscale combustion calorimetry (MCC). The combustion properties of the samples will be characterized on the basis of the released heat, heat release rate, and other parameters. In Figure 8 and Table 2, compared with pure SFCM, both temperature of initial decomposition and heat release rate of SFCM(CH/MMT)5 and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 were slightly decreased. Moreover, both total released heat and maximum heat release rate of SFCM(CH/MMT)5 and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 composites are lower than those of pure SFCM, where the maximum heat release rate of SFCM(CH/MMT)10 is lower than that of pure cellulose by 47.5 W/g, and the total released heat of SFCM(CH/MMT)5 and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 is lower than that of pure SFCM by more than 21%.Table 2
MCC results of pure SFCM, SFCM(CH/MMT)5, and SFCM(CH/MMT)10.
Samples
pkHRR (°C)
pkHRR (W/g)
Total HR (kJ/g)
SFCMSFCM(CH/MMT)5  SFCM(CH/MMT)10
371.2318.2  302.4
296.6282.7  249.1
15.011.3  11.7Figure 8
Heat release rate versus temperature for pure SFCM, SFCM(CH/MMT)5, and SFCM(CH/MMT)10.It is concluded that the presence of CH/MMT coating enhanced the flame retardant performance of SFCM to some extent. It is elucidated that MMT inorganic layer does not react with the cellulose, so MMT mainly functions as a physical barrier on the surface of cellulose, during the combustion process of SFCM(CH/MMT)n, of which flame retardant effect is limited. Hence, in terms of flame retardant performance, the composites cannot match with intumescent P–N fire retardant that can react with cellulose [27], which has also been confirmed by literatures related to retardant coating fabricated by inorganic nanoparticles, such as SiO2 [28] or POSS [29].


## 3.1. Impact of CH/MMT Coating on SFCM Zeta Potential

Zeta potential online monitoring can be used to characterize the dynamic adsorption of chitosan and montmorillonite suspensions on SFCM surface. The residual CH and MMT solution would affect the zeta potential of the samples, so we can confirm that the measurement of the zeta potential of SFCM/(CH/MMT)n adsorption was acted after the samples have been washed in deionized water for some time in order to remove the residual of the CH or MMT.Figure2 shows that the adsorption of each CH/MMT layer will turn the negative (or positive) potential into a positive (or negative) one. This potential reverse indicates that CH/MMT has been assembled to SFCM surface. Further, as the number of adsorption layers increases, absolute amount of the surface zeta charges becomes gradually smaller. This is probably because the MMT clay layer deposited on cellulose surface formed a relatively flat deposition surface where there are less nanotopological structures [23] compared with the pure polymer electrolyte self-assembly, so that less polymer chains will be deposited on this plane, resulting in the declined absolute amount of surface zeta charges as above mentioned.Figure 2
Changes of zeta potential at alternative absorption steps of CH and MMT.


## 3.2. Effect of CH/MMT Coating on SFCM Composite Crystal Structure

For further describing the assembly of CH/MMT coating on SFCM surface, XRD was carried out to characterize pure MMT, SFCM, SFCM(CH/MMT)5, and SFCM(CH/MMT)10. As shown in Figure 3, between small angles 3° and 10°, an MMT diffraction peak corresponding to pure MMT at 2θ = 6.8° occurs. According to the Bragg equation (2dsinθ =nλ), pure MMT interplanar spacing is 13.1 Å, whereas an MMT diffraction peak of SFCM(CH/MMT)5 and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 appears where 2θ = 4.8° and 5.0°, which has not been observed in the pattern of pure SFCM. Compared to pure MMT, MMT diffraction peak of SFCM(CH/MMT)5 and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 is shifted to a smaller angle. It is elucidated from the peak shift toward small angle that the interplanar spacing of MMT in CH/MMT nanocoating layer is larger than that in pure MMT. The reason might be that CH amid MMT sheets or the peeling of MMT layer during sonication process increases the distance between layers, which is consistent with Li et al.’s report [24]. Exceptionally, peaks intensity corresponding to SFCM(CH/MMT)5 and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 is much weaker than the peak intensity of pure MMT. The reason might be the following: the absorbed MMT has a low content and fewer deposition layers, and thus the CH/MMT coating is so thin that MMT layered structure, within the coating, cannot be converted from amorphousness into ordered structure [15].Figure 3
X-ray diffraction patterns of pure MMT, pure SFCM, SFCM(CH/MMT)5, and SFCM(CH/MMT)10.


## 3.3. Influence of CH/MMT Coating on Thermal Properties of SFCM

To clarify the impact of CH/MMT nanocoating on thermal performance of SFCM, pure SFCM and SFCM(CH/MMT)n composites (n
=
1, 5, and 10) were tested by TGA analysis (Figure 4). Before 340°C, TGA curves of SFCM, before and after treatment, are almost the same. The characteristic thermal parameters selected were the temperature for 5% and 10% weight loss. The results are summarized in Table 1. Table 1 shows that thermal properties of the treated SFCM are slightly better than those of untreated SFCM. At a weight loss of 10%, compared with pure SFCM, decomposition temperatures of SFCM(CH/MMT)1, SFCM(CH/MMT)5, and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 composites are elevated by 3, 4, and 3°C, respectively. On the other hand, between 340 and 700°C, it is found that the char yield of coated SFCM(CH/MMT)n is higher than that of pure SFCM. Moreover, as adsorption layers increase, char yield rises as well. At 700°C, compared with pure SFCM, char yields of SFCM(CH/MMT)1, SFCM(CH/MMT)5, and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 are increased by 9.6%, 12.0%, and 19.7%, respectively. This increase may be ascribed to the nanolayer of MMT that forms a sheet of carbon residue covering the surface of cellulose during heating process, because of which heat was insulated, protecting an amount of cellulose microcrystals from destruction.Table 1
TGA results for SFCM coated with different number of CH/MMT bilayers.
Samples
Temperature at  5 wt% loss (°C)
Temperature at  10 wt% loss (°C)
Residue (wt%)
SFCM
299
312
5.4
SFCM(CH/MMT)1
302
315
15.0
SFCM(CH/MMT)5 SFCM(CH/MMT)10
303300
316315
17.425.1Figure 4
TGA plots of SFCM coated with different number of CH/MMT bilayers.


## 3.4. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Analysis

Carbon residue, after TGA test, of pure SFCM, SFCM(CH/MMT)5, and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 was subjected to FTIR testing. As it is shown in Figure 5, for TGA residual carbon of SFCM(CH/MMT)10, stretching vibration peaks corresponding to methyl and methylene on cellulose appeared at 2970 and 2925 cm−1 [25], while these peaks of pure SFCM and SFCM(CH/MMT)5 are almost negligible. This implies that, with the increase of CH/MMT layers, cellulose microcrystals was protected in the process of thermal degradation. In addition, there is another peak at 1050 cm−1 for TG residual carbon of SFCM(CH/MMT)5 and SFCM(CH/MMT)10, which may be Si–O–Si stretching vibration peak of MMT or stretching vibration absorption peak of the cellulose C–C skeleton, indicating that the TG residual carbon of SFCM(CH/MMT)10 might be composed of cellulose microcrystalline and MMT [26].Figure 5
FTIR spectra of char residues of pure SFCM, SFCM(CH/MMT)5, and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 (charred in N2 at 700°C).


## 3.5. Morphology and Surface Element Analysis of SFCM and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 Composite

Field emission scanning electron micrographs of pure SFCM (Figure6(a)) and its TGA carbon residue (Figure 6(c)) and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 (Figure 6(b)) and its TGA carbon residue (Figure 6(d)) are given. It can be observed that the surface of pure SFCM is continuous cellulose structure with clear texture, clean surface, and regular structure, whereas the cellulose surface is coated with fold-like layers in Figure 6(b) and it is unable to clearly see continuous and clear-textured cellulose skeleton. For this reason, surface element analysis for pure SFCM and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 samples was shown in Figures 7(a) and 7(b). Figure 7(a) verifies the presence of elements C and O on the surface of pure SFCM without Si. However, in Figure 7(b), besides C and O, Si, Mg, Al, and other elements were also detected on the surface of SFCM(CH/MMT)10, demonstrating that the fold layers in Figure 6(b) should be MMT nanolayers.Figure 6
FESEM images of (a) pure SFCM, (b) SFCM(CH/MMT)10, and (c) char residues of pure SFCM and (d) SFCM(CH/MMT)10 (charred in N2 at 700°C).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure 7
Superficial elemental distribution of (a) pure SFCM and (b) SFCM(CH/MMT)10.
(a)
(b)Clear spiral contraction texture of pure SFCM can be observed in Figure6(c), and this is because of the severe contraction of cellulose during heating process. On the other hand, composite SFCM(CH/MMT)10 surface shrinkage has been significantly weakened, and this may be due to a thermal insulation coke layer which was formed during the heating of CH/MMT coating. This layer has satisfying insulation properties, inhibiting the heat from being transferred to the internal cellulose, that is, a protective effect.


## 3.6. Impact of CH/MMT Coating on Flame Retardant Performance of SFCM

To study the effect of CH/MMT on combustion properties of pure SFCM, SFCM(CH/MMT)5, and SFCM(CH/MMT)10, powder samples were tested through microscale combustion calorimetry (MCC). The combustion properties of the samples will be characterized on the basis of the released heat, heat release rate, and other parameters. In Figure 8 and Table 2, compared with pure SFCM, both temperature of initial decomposition and heat release rate of SFCM(CH/MMT)5 and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 were slightly decreased. Moreover, both total released heat and maximum heat release rate of SFCM(CH/MMT)5 and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 composites are lower than those of pure SFCM, where the maximum heat release rate of SFCM(CH/MMT)10 is lower than that of pure cellulose by 47.5 W/g, and the total released heat of SFCM(CH/MMT)5 and SFCM(CH/MMT)10 is lower than that of pure SFCM by more than 21%.Table 2
MCC results of pure SFCM, SFCM(CH/MMT)5, and SFCM(CH/MMT)10.
Samples
pkHRR (°C)
pkHRR (W/g)
Total HR (kJ/g)
SFCMSFCM(CH/MMT)5  SFCM(CH/MMT)10
371.2318.2  302.4
296.6282.7  249.1
15.011.3  11.7Figure 8
Heat release rate versus temperature for pure SFCM, SFCM(CH/MMT)5, and SFCM(CH/MMT)10.It is concluded that the presence of CH/MMT coating enhanced the flame retardant performance of SFCM to some extent. It is elucidated that MMT inorganic layer does not react with the cellulose, so MMT mainly functions as a physical barrier on the surface of cellulose, during the combustion process of SFCM(CH/MMT)n, of which flame retardant effect is limited. Hence, in terms of flame retardant performance, the composites cannot match with intumescent P–N fire retardant that can react with cellulose [27], which has also been confirmed by literatures related to retardant coating fabricated by inorganic nanoparticles, such as SiO2 [28] or POSS [29].


## 4. Conclusion

CH/MMT coating on the surface of SFCM was prepared by LBL self-assembly method and our results reveal that the assembly of CH/MMT coating could increase heat resistance and flame retardancy of SFCM. TGA results demonstrate that the thermal performance of treated SFCM is commonly superior to that of untreated SFCM. With the increase of the number of adsorbed layers, carbon residue increases. Meanwhile, MCC results indicate that the existence of CH/MMT coating has significantly improved flame retardant capability of SFCM.



---

*Source: 691290-2015-06-09.xml*