# Synthesis, Novel Crystal Structure, andβ-Amyloid Binding Property of Re(I) (tricarbonyl)+ EHIDA Analogue

Authors: Yang Yang; Jia Xin Zhang; Lin Zhu; Huabei Zhang
Journal: Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications
 (2009)

---

## Abstract

A neutral compound Re(CO)3(L)
(L: 2-((2-(2,6-diethylphenylamino)-2-oxoethyl)(2-ethoxy-2-oxoethyl)amino)acetic acid, an IDA analogue) has been synthesized and evaluated for in vitro imaging probes of β-amyloid (Aβ) aggregates. Results of X-ray measurement of Re(CO)3(L) demonstrated that the coordination mode of Re(CO)3(L) was different from that of classical Re/Tc(I) (tricarbonyl)-IDA analogues; the structure of Re(CO)3(L) was confirmed by means of infrared spectrum, HPLC-UV, TOF MS, and X-ray measurements (Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre number is 732731): monoclinic P21/c, a=15.6636 (12) Å, b=10.9360 (8) Å, c=27.756 (2) Å, α=90.000 (0)∘, β=90.783 (5)∘, γ=90.000 (0)∘, and Z=8. The binding affinity for β-amyloid plaques was assessed by in vitro binding assay using preformed synthetic Aβ(1–40) aggregates. The neutral compound Re(CO)3(L) showed binding affinity to Aβ aggregates at micromolar level by fluorescence spectroscopy, and this work will encourage for further exploration of imaging agents labeled by T99mc(CO)3+  center as probes for β-amyloid plaques in vivo.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s  disease (AD) is a  neurodegenerative disease characterized by dementia, cognitive impairment, and memory loss, and so far the only definitive confirmation of AD is universally accepted by histopathologic examination of extracellular amyloid plaques comprised of amyloid-beta (Aβ) aggregates and intracellular numerous neurofibrillary tangles in the postmortem brain;  furthermore, formation of Aβ aggregates in the brain became the hallmark feature on early pathogenesis of AD before another alternative hypothesis emerged  [1]. Several compounds have been selected to be radiolabeled and used in the noninvasive detection of Aβ aggregates by imaging techniques of positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission-computed tomography (SPECT); in addition, these representative Aβ-detectors were derivatives of congo red, thioflavin, stilbene, and DDNP (6-dialakylamino-2-naphthylidene), such as 11C-PIB, 125I-TZDM, 11C-SB-13, and 18F-FDDNP  [2]. However, the progress of SPECT imaging agents labeled by techenetium-99m center fell behind, because of their low rates of penetration through the blood-brain barrier (BBB) [3]. Iminodiacetic acid (IDA) derivatives EHIDA labeled by  99mTc(CO)3  has been studied on physicochemical properties and biological evaluation  [4, 5], but the structure of technetium(I)-tricarbonyl EHIDA has not been identified. In this paper, we reported the synthesis of Re(CO)3(L) (L is esterified EHIDA), and the novel crystal structure of this complex was determined by X-ray measurement: the coordination mode of Re(CO)3(L) was different from that of classical Re/Tc(I) (tricarbonyl)-IDA derivatives. The neutral compound Re(CO)3(L) showed binding affinity to Aβ aggregates in vitro at micromolar level by fluorescence spectroscopy.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Materials and Preformed Synthetic Aβ(1–40) Aggregates

Aβ(1~40) peptide was purchased from Shang Hai “Supermed’’ Trade Limited Company. Re(CO)5Br, Thioflavin T, Phosphate Buffer Solution (PBS, pH = 7.4), and EDTA were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Company. Other chemicals were all purchased from Beijing Chemical Reagents Company. EHIDA was synthesized according to the previous method [6].Formation of Aβ(1~40) aggregates. Aβ(1~40) aggregates (Figure 1(a)) were prepared according to the method published previously  [7]. 1 mg of brief Aβ(1~40) and 20 μL EDTA solution (1 mM) were dissolved in 2 mL PBS (pH = 7.4), and the mixture was mixed with a magnetic stir bar (300 rpm) for 72 hours at 37°C to result in a visibly cloudy solution. The production of Aβ(1~40) aggregates was confirmed by a Jeol 100CX-transmission electron microscope (purchased from JEOL USA, Inc.). Additional test for the formation of  Aβ(1~40)  aggregates was also performed using Thioflavine T (2 μM) by fluorescence spectroscopy (excitation wavelength: 450 nm, scan range was from 460 to 600 nm) [8]; there was an obvious enhance of fluorescence intensity of Thioflavine T at the emission wavelength of 485 nm when 5 μL solution of Aβ(1~40)   aggregates was added to the 500 μL solution of Thioflavine T (2 μM) (Figure 1(b)).  Aβ(1~40)  aggregates were used immediately after preparation.(a) Observation of Aβ(1~40)  aggregates by transmission electron microscope (b) Formation of Aβ(1~40) aggregates using Thioflavine T by fluorescence spectroscopy red line: fluorescence intensity of the mixture of 5 μL solution of Aβ(1~40)  aggregates and 500 μL solution of Thioflavine T (2 μM); black line: fluorescence intensity of 500 μL solution of Thioflavine T (2 μM) only.
(a)(b)


### 2.2. Syntheses and X-Ray Measurement

EHIDA (2,2′-(2-(2,6-diethylphenylamino)-2-oxoethylazanediyl)diacetic acid)  was synthesized according to the previous method [6], and the structure of EHIDA has been confirmed by using melting  point mensuration, IR, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and Mass Spectrometry (data did not be shown). 200 μmol Re(CO)5Br reacted with the equimolar EHIDA in the refluxing mixture of 50 mL ethanol and 0.1 mL H2SO4 (4 mol/L) for 48 hours, then the reaction solution was washed by saturated NaHCO3 solution and the target product was extracted by ethyl acetate, and after evaporating the ethyl acetate, the yellowish solid precipitated. The product was recrystallized in the mixture of dichloromethane/ethanol (4:1) for one  week to obtain Re(CO)3(L) crystal. Results of X-ray measurement of Re(CO)3(L) were obtained (Tables 1 and 2). IR (KBr): high bands of CO (2036.6, 1922.3, 1903.0 cm-1, very strong) and additional  bands for the CO-group of the amide (1633.0 cm-1, strong), CH3 group (3062.9, 2969.3 cm-1, medium). TOF MS+ (m/z): 619.0880, 621.0872; calcd for C21H25N2O8185/187Re, M = 619.0, 621.0.Table 1
Summary of crystal data  of Re(CO)3(L).
Re(CO)3(L)Empirical formulaC21H19N2O8ReFormula weight613.58Temperature296 (2) KWavelength0.71073 ACrystal system, space groupMonoclinic,P2(1)/cUnit cell dimensionsA(Å)15.6636 (12)B(Å)10.9360 (8)C(Å)27.756(2)α(°)90.000 (0)β(°)90.783 (5)γ(°)90.000 (0)Unit cell Volume(Å3)4754.1 (6)Z, Calculated density8,  1.715 mg/m3Absorption coefficient (mm-1)5.158 mm-1F(000)2384Crystal size0.34×0.07×0.05 mmCompleteness to theta = 25.4699.5%Goodness-of-fit onF21.007FinalR indices [I>2σ(I)]; R1, wR20.0324,  0.0729R indices (all data); R1, wR2a0.0619,  0.0838aR1=∑(|Fo|−|Fc|)/∑|Fo|; wR2=[∑[w(Fo2−Fc2)2]/∑[w(Fo2)2]]1/2.Table 2
Selected bond distances (Å) and bond angles(°) for the neutral complex: Re(CO)3(L).
LigandRe(CO)3(L)Re1-CCO1.896 (7), 1.871 (6), 1.912 (6)Re2-CCO1.891 (7), 1.904 (7), 1.918 (7)Re1-Ocarboxyl2.115 (4), 2.160 (4)Re2-Ocarboxyl2.109 (4), 2.174 (4)Re1-N2.254 (4)Re2-N2.266 (4)C(2)-Re(1)-C(1)87.9 (3)C(2)-Re(1)-C(3)87.0 (3)C(1)-Re(1)-C(3)90.0 (3)C(2)-Re(1)-O(4)97.8 (2)C(1)-Re(1)-O(4)172.1 (2)C(3)-Re(1)-O(4)95.7 (2)C(2)-Re(1)-O(6)175.6 (2)C(1)-Re(1)-O(6)93.2 (2)C(3)-Re(1)-O(6)97.2 (2)O(4)-Re(1)-O(6)80.68 (15)C(2)-Re(1)-N(1)100.4 (2)C(1)-Re(1)-N(1)95.6 (2)C(3)-Re(1)-N(1)170.8 (2)O(4)-Re(1)-N(1)78.01 (15)O(6)-Re(1)-N(1)75.23 (14)C(22)-Re(2)-C(23)86.2 (3)C(22)-Re(2)-C(24)88.1 (3)C(23)-Re(2)-C(24)86.5 (3)C(22)-Re(2)-O(12)98.9 (2)C(23)-Re(2)-O(12)174.3 (2)C(24)-Re(2)-O(12)96.2 (2)C(22)-Re(2)-O(14)174.3 (2)C(23)-Re(2)-O(14)94.1 (2)C(24)-Re(2)-O(14)97.7 (2)O(12)-Re(2)-O(14)80.57 (15)C(22)-Re(2)-N(3)99.1 (2)C(23)-Re(2)-N(3)99.1 (2)C(24)-Re(2)-N(3)171.2 (2)O(12)-Re(2)-N(3)77.70 (15)O(14)-Re(2)-N(3)75.20 (15)The X-ray  measurement of Re(CO)3(L) was carried out on a CCD area X-ray detector. The Mo Kα radiation (wavelength = 0.71073 Å) was used. The data  were collected by SADABS (Siemens Area Detector Absorption correction program). The nonhydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically, whereas the hydrogen atoms were placed in the calculated positions. The atomic scattering factors were taken from   [9, Tables  6.1.1.4 and  4.2.6.8]. Details of the X-ray measurements and crystal data  for Re(CO)3(L) are given in Tables 1 and 2. Copies of the data  can be obtained on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK (Fax: (+44) 1223-336-033; E-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk; Internet: www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html). The CCDC number of Re(CO)3(L) is 732731.


### 2.3. HPLC-UV Analysis and UV Visible of Re(CO)3(L) and EHIDA

HPLC-UV analysis was carried out with an Alltima RP C-18 column (250×4.6 mm2, 5 μm) by using an Shimadzu System with SCL-10Avp HPLC pump system and UV detector. The analysis gradient was  (a): 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water, (b): 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile: 0 to 20 minutes, from 100% (a) to 100% (b); 20 to 30 minutes, 100% (b). The flow rate was 0.9 mL/min. The excitation wavelength was 254 nm. Results were displayed in Figure 2. UV-visible absorption spectra of the ethanol solution of Re(CO)3(L) and EHIDA were recorded, with excitation wavelength scanning from 220 to 360 nm at room temperature. Results were in Figure 3.HPLC retention times of Re(CO)3(L) (a) and 99mTc(CO)3(EHIDA) (b).
(a)(b)Ultraviolet Spectrum of the EHIDA (a) and Re(CO)3(L) (b).
(a)(b)


### 2.4. Binding Affinity to Aβ(1~40) Aggregates by Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Fresh solution of 0.1 mM Re(CO)3(L) was diluted to obtain a final concentration range of 19~24 μM Re(CO)3(L) in 500 μL PBS (pH 7.4). 5 μL solution of Aβ(1~40) aggregates was added to 500 μL PBS solution of Re(CO)3(L) (the concentrations were 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 μM, resp.), and the mixed solution was incubated for 1 minute at room temperature before measuring the fluorescence intensity (slit-width was 2 nm). Excitation wavelength was 320 nm, and a 350~600 nm scan range was performed. All the data were performed in triplicate. The linear relationship between the concentrations (Re(CO)3(L) only and Re(CO)3(L) incubated with Aβ(1~40)  aggregates) and the integration of corresponding fluorescence intensity was analysed by Microcal Origin 6.0. Results were shown in Figure 6.


## 2.1. Materials and Preformed Synthetic Aβ(1–40) Aggregates

Aβ(1~40) peptide was purchased from Shang Hai “Supermed’’ Trade Limited Company. Re(CO)5Br, Thioflavin T, Phosphate Buffer Solution (PBS, pH = 7.4), and EDTA were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Company. Other chemicals were all purchased from Beijing Chemical Reagents Company. EHIDA was synthesized according to the previous method [6].Formation of Aβ(1~40) aggregates. Aβ(1~40) aggregates (Figure 1(a)) were prepared according to the method published previously  [7]. 1 mg of brief Aβ(1~40) and 20 μL EDTA solution (1 mM) were dissolved in 2 mL PBS (pH = 7.4), and the mixture was mixed with a magnetic stir bar (300 rpm) for 72 hours at 37°C to result in a visibly cloudy solution. The production of Aβ(1~40) aggregates was confirmed by a Jeol 100CX-transmission electron microscope (purchased from JEOL USA, Inc.). Additional test for the formation of  Aβ(1~40)  aggregates was also performed using Thioflavine T (2 μM) by fluorescence spectroscopy (excitation wavelength: 450 nm, scan range was from 460 to 600 nm) [8]; there was an obvious enhance of fluorescence intensity of Thioflavine T at the emission wavelength of 485 nm when 5 μL solution of Aβ(1~40)   aggregates was added to the 500 μL solution of Thioflavine T (2 μM) (Figure 1(b)).  Aβ(1~40)  aggregates were used immediately after preparation.(a) Observation of Aβ(1~40)  aggregates by transmission electron microscope (b) Formation of Aβ(1~40) aggregates using Thioflavine T by fluorescence spectroscopy red line: fluorescence intensity of the mixture of 5 μL solution of Aβ(1~40)  aggregates and 500 μL solution of Thioflavine T (2 μM); black line: fluorescence intensity of 500 μL solution of Thioflavine T (2 μM) only.
(a)(b)


## 2.2. Syntheses and X-Ray Measurement

EHIDA (2,2′-(2-(2,6-diethylphenylamino)-2-oxoethylazanediyl)diacetic acid)  was synthesized according to the previous method [6], and the structure of EHIDA has been confirmed by using melting  point mensuration, IR, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and Mass Spectrometry (data did not be shown). 200 μmol Re(CO)5Br reacted with the equimolar EHIDA in the refluxing mixture of 50 mL ethanol and 0.1 mL H2SO4 (4 mol/L) for 48 hours, then the reaction solution was washed by saturated NaHCO3 solution and the target product was extracted by ethyl acetate, and after evaporating the ethyl acetate, the yellowish solid precipitated. The product was recrystallized in the mixture of dichloromethane/ethanol (4:1) for one  week to obtain Re(CO)3(L) crystal. Results of X-ray measurement of Re(CO)3(L) were obtained (Tables 1 and 2). IR (KBr): high bands of CO (2036.6, 1922.3, 1903.0 cm-1, very strong) and additional  bands for the CO-group of the amide (1633.0 cm-1, strong), CH3 group (3062.9, 2969.3 cm-1, medium). TOF MS+ (m/z): 619.0880, 621.0872; calcd for C21H25N2O8185/187Re, M = 619.0, 621.0.Table 1
Summary of crystal data  of Re(CO)3(L).
Re(CO)3(L)Empirical formulaC21H19N2O8ReFormula weight613.58Temperature296 (2) KWavelength0.71073 ACrystal system, space groupMonoclinic,P2(1)/cUnit cell dimensionsA(Å)15.6636 (12)B(Å)10.9360 (8)C(Å)27.756(2)α(°)90.000 (0)β(°)90.783 (5)γ(°)90.000 (0)Unit cell Volume(Å3)4754.1 (6)Z, Calculated density8,  1.715 mg/m3Absorption coefficient (mm-1)5.158 mm-1F(000)2384Crystal size0.34×0.07×0.05 mmCompleteness to theta = 25.4699.5%Goodness-of-fit onF21.007FinalR indices [I>2σ(I)]; R1, wR20.0324,  0.0729R indices (all data); R1, wR2a0.0619,  0.0838aR1=∑(|Fo|−|Fc|)/∑|Fo|; wR2=[∑[w(Fo2−Fc2)2]/∑[w(Fo2)2]]1/2.Table 2
Selected bond distances (Å) and bond angles(°) for the neutral complex: Re(CO)3(L).
LigandRe(CO)3(L)Re1-CCO1.896 (7), 1.871 (6), 1.912 (6)Re2-CCO1.891 (7), 1.904 (7), 1.918 (7)Re1-Ocarboxyl2.115 (4), 2.160 (4)Re2-Ocarboxyl2.109 (4), 2.174 (4)Re1-N2.254 (4)Re2-N2.266 (4)C(2)-Re(1)-C(1)87.9 (3)C(2)-Re(1)-C(3)87.0 (3)C(1)-Re(1)-C(3)90.0 (3)C(2)-Re(1)-O(4)97.8 (2)C(1)-Re(1)-O(4)172.1 (2)C(3)-Re(1)-O(4)95.7 (2)C(2)-Re(1)-O(6)175.6 (2)C(1)-Re(1)-O(6)93.2 (2)C(3)-Re(1)-O(6)97.2 (2)O(4)-Re(1)-O(6)80.68 (15)C(2)-Re(1)-N(1)100.4 (2)C(1)-Re(1)-N(1)95.6 (2)C(3)-Re(1)-N(1)170.8 (2)O(4)-Re(1)-N(1)78.01 (15)O(6)-Re(1)-N(1)75.23 (14)C(22)-Re(2)-C(23)86.2 (3)C(22)-Re(2)-C(24)88.1 (3)C(23)-Re(2)-C(24)86.5 (3)C(22)-Re(2)-O(12)98.9 (2)C(23)-Re(2)-O(12)174.3 (2)C(24)-Re(2)-O(12)96.2 (2)C(22)-Re(2)-O(14)174.3 (2)C(23)-Re(2)-O(14)94.1 (2)C(24)-Re(2)-O(14)97.7 (2)O(12)-Re(2)-O(14)80.57 (15)C(22)-Re(2)-N(3)99.1 (2)C(23)-Re(2)-N(3)99.1 (2)C(24)-Re(2)-N(3)171.2 (2)O(12)-Re(2)-N(3)77.70 (15)O(14)-Re(2)-N(3)75.20 (15)The X-ray  measurement of Re(CO)3(L) was carried out on a CCD area X-ray detector. The Mo Kα radiation (wavelength = 0.71073 Å) was used. The data  were collected by SADABS (Siemens Area Detector Absorption correction program). The nonhydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically, whereas the hydrogen atoms were placed in the calculated positions. The atomic scattering factors were taken from   [9, Tables  6.1.1.4 and  4.2.6.8]. Details of the X-ray measurements and crystal data  for Re(CO)3(L) are given in Tables 1 and 2. Copies of the data  can be obtained on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK (Fax: (+44) 1223-336-033; E-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk; Internet: www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html). The CCDC number of Re(CO)3(L) is 732731.


## 2.3. HPLC-UV Analysis and UV Visible of Re(CO)3(L) and EHIDA

HPLC-UV analysis was carried out with an Alltima RP C-18 column (250×4.6 mm2, 5 μm) by using an Shimadzu System with SCL-10Avp HPLC pump system and UV detector. The analysis gradient was  (a): 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water, (b): 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile: 0 to 20 minutes, from 100% (a) to 100% (b); 20 to 30 minutes, 100% (b). The flow rate was 0.9 mL/min. The excitation wavelength was 254 nm. Results were displayed in Figure 2. UV-visible absorption spectra of the ethanol solution of Re(CO)3(L) and EHIDA were recorded, with excitation wavelength scanning from 220 to 360 nm at room temperature. Results were in Figure 3.HPLC retention times of Re(CO)3(L) (a) and 99mTc(CO)3(EHIDA) (b).
(a)(b)Ultraviolet Spectrum of the EHIDA (a) and Re(CO)3(L) (b).
(a)(b)


## 2.4. Binding Affinity to Aβ(1~40) Aggregates by Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Fresh solution of 0.1 mM Re(CO)3(L) was diluted to obtain a final concentration range of 19~24 μM Re(CO)3(L) in 500 μL PBS (pH 7.4). 5 μL solution of Aβ(1~40) aggregates was added to 500 μL PBS solution of Re(CO)3(L) (the concentrations were 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 μM, resp.), and the mixed solution was incubated for 1 minute at room temperature before measuring the fluorescence intensity (slit-width was 2 nm). Excitation wavelength was 320 nm, and a 350~600 nm scan range was performed. All the data were performed in triplicate. The linear relationship between the concentrations (Re(CO)3(L) only and Re(CO)3(L) incubated with Aβ(1~40)  aggregates) and the integration of corresponding fluorescence intensity was analysed by Microcal Origin 6.0. Results were shown in Figure 6.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Comparison of HPLC Analysis between Re(CO)3(L) and 99mTc(CO)3(EHIDA)

The retention time of Re(CO)3(L) (7.2 minutes) was not similar to that of 99mTc(CO)3(EHIDA) (18.0 minutes) [5] (shown in Figure 2), which is speculated due to the change of lipophilicity of the ligand from EHIDA to esterification form. Esterified EHIDA (L) was more lipophilic than EHIDA; so the retention times of Re(CO)3(L) and 99mTc(CO)3(EHIDA) were different; however, the difference of properties of the Re(CO)3+  core and  99mTc(CO)3+ core may also lead to the different retention times.


### 3.2. UV Visible of Re(CO)3(L) and EHIDA

The UV-visible absorption spectra of the complexes are illustrated in Figure3. Upon EHIDA, the visible intraligand (π-π*) bands at 240 nm and 265 nm were due to the fact that these two bands are of mainly bpy-localized in nature. In comparison, the additional visible MLCT (d-π*) band of Re(CO)3(L) at 280 nm was clearly associated with the coordinational –C=O group on comparison with the UV spectra of the analogue Re(I)(tricarbonyl)+ complexes [10]  without the –CH2–C=O group.


### 3.3. Description of the Structure of Re(CO)3(L): The neutral crystal of Re(CO)3

Selected distances and bond angles of the neutral crystal of Re(CO)3(L) are listed in Table 2,  and the molecular views are presented in Figure 4. From the ORTEP drawing of the Re(CO)3(L), it can be known that there were two different structures of Re(CO)3(L) in one crystal cell.ORTEP drawing of the Re(CO)3(L).
(a)(b)The IDA derivatives often coordinate with Re/Tc(I)  (tricarbonyl)+   centers via classic coordination manner, which is that  each  oxygen atom of the two carboxyl groups and one N atom combine to the empty orbit in the rhenium or technetium  [11], oppositely, our research of the crystal structure of Re(CO)3(L) demonstrated that oxygen atom of carbonyl has more stronger coordination ability than the carboxyl group, so that an oxygen atom in the carbonyl group, an oxygen atom in the carboxyl group, and the N atom coordinated with the Re(CO)3+  core in the molecular of Re(CO)3(L), and as a result, 2-((2-(2,6-diethylphenylamino)-2-oxoethyl)(2-ethoxy-2-oxoethyl)amino)acetic acid (L or Esterified EHIDA) reacted with Re(CO)5Br resulting in neutral but not negative Re(CO)3(L)  (Figure 5).Structures of Na/NEt4[Re(L2)(CO)3], NEt4[Re(L3)(CO)3] [11] EHIDA, L, and Re(CO)3(L).
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(a) The fluorescence intensity of Re(CO)3(L) (20 μM) (black line) and Re(CO)3(L) (20 μM) incubated with Aβ(1~40)  aggregates (red line) at the emission wavelength of 425 nm. (b) Equation (1): the nether line and Equation (2): the upper line. (c) The fluorescence intensity of EHIDA (0.4 mM) and emission wavelength (excitation wavelength is 280 nm).
(a)(b)(c)


### 3.4. Studies on Binding Aβ(1~40) Aggregates In Vitro

The fluorescence intensity of the mixture of Aβ(1~40)  aggregates and Re(CO)3(L) can be significantly stronger than the fluorescence intensity of Re(CO)3(L) only when the concentration of Re(CO)3(L) was more than 19 μM; for example, when 500 μL Re(CO)3(L) (20 μM) was added to the solution of Aβ(1~40) aggregates, there was an obvious enhance of fluorescence intensity at the emission wavelength of 425 nm (Figure 6(a)), oppositely, different from the visible fluorescence spectroscopy of EHIDA at 320 nm (Figure 6(c)). Upon excitation there occurs an intramolecular charge transfer of Re(CO)3(L) between the –NH–C=O group and rhenium, and then back charge transfer will be impossible. Upon addition of Aβ(1~40) aggregates, there was a visible enhance of fluorescence intensity at 425 nm, with no disturb of emission wavelength. Considering the breakage of the system of conjugated bonds due to the reorientation of the benzene ring and amide group of Re(CO)3(L) with respect to one another in PBS solution, the enhance of fluorescence intensity was mainly because of the breakage of the system of conjugated bonds being inhabited by the microsurrounding of β-amyloid aggregates when Aβ(1~40) aggregates was added [12]; as a result, an increased MLCT of Re(CO)3(L) then occurred. However, the dissociation constant of Thioflavin T equaled 2 μM  [8], lower than that of Re(CO)3(L), because of there is no obvious enhance of fluorescence intensity when the concentration of Re(CO)3(L) was little than 19 μM. Generally, probes which bind characteristically to β-amyloid fribils have more than one conjugationg system and electron-donating groups such as Me2N–, MeNH–, MeO–, and HO– in their molecular skeletons [13], opposite to the structure of Re(CO)3(L), indicative of a nonclassical intercalation of the complex binding to the Aβ(1~40) aggregates. The rather good linear relationship between the concentrations of Re(CO)3(L) and fluorescence intensity (equation (1), Figure 6(b)) was obtained by Microcal Origin 6.0:(1)Y=-9.51095×107+5.53571×106X(R:0.98151,SD:2.2583×106,N:6,P:5.09878×10-4),
where Y is the fluorescence intensity; X is the concentrations, from 19 to 24 μM; R is the linear correlation coefficient; SD is the standard error.When binding toβ-amyloid aggregates, there was also a great linear relationship between the concentrations of Re(CO)3(L) and fluorescence intensity (equation (2), Figure 6(b)):(2)Y=-9.74219×107+5.69714×106X(R:0.98544,SD:2.05598×106,N:6,P:3.16429×10-4),
where Y  is the fluorescence intensity; X is the concentrations of Re(CO)3(L), from 19 to 24 μM; R is the linear correlation coefficient; SD is the standard error.


## 3.1. Comparison of HPLC Analysis between Re(CO)3(L) and 99mTc(CO)3(EHIDA)

The retention time of Re(CO)3(L) (7.2 minutes) was not similar to that of 99mTc(CO)3(EHIDA) (18.0 minutes) [5] (shown in Figure 2), which is speculated due to the change of lipophilicity of the ligand from EHIDA to esterification form. Esterified EHIDA (L) was more lipophilic than EHIDA; so the retention times of Re(CO)3(L) and 99mTc(CO)3(EHIDA) were different; however, the difference of properties of the Re(CO)3+  core and  99mTc(CO)3+ core may also lead to the different retention times.


## 3.2. UV Visible of Re(CO)3(L) and EHIDA

The UV-visible absorption spectra of the complexes are illustrated in Figure3. Upon EHIDA, the visible intraligand (π-π*) bands at 240 nm and 265 nm were due to the fact that these two bands are of mainly bpy-localized in nature. In comparison, the additional visible MLCT (d-π*) band of Re(CO)3(L) at 280 nm was clearly associated with the coordinational –C=O group on comparison with the UV spectra of the analogue Re(I)(tricarbonyl)+ complexes [10]  without the –CH2–C=O group.


## 3.3. Description of the Structure of Re(CO)3(L): The neutral crystal of Re(CO)3

Selected distances and bond angles of the neutral crystal of Re(CO)3(L) are listed in Table 2,  and the molecular views are presented in Figure 4. From the ORTEP drawing of the Re(CO)3(L), it can be known that there were two different structures of Re(CO)3(L) in one crystal cell.ORTEP drawing of the Re(CO)3(L).
(a)(b)The IDA derivatives often coordinate with Re/Tc(I)  (tricarbonyl)+   centers via classic coordination manner, which is that  each  oxygen atom of the two carboxyl groups and one N atom combine to the empty orbit in the rhenium or technetium  [11], oppositely, our research of the crystal structure of Re(CO)3(L) demonstrated that oxygen atom of carbonyl has more stronger coordination ability than the carboxyl group, so that an oxygen atom in the carbonyl group, an oxygen atom in the carboxyl group, and the N atom coordinated with the Re(CO)3+  core in the molecular of Re(CO)3(L), and as a result, 2-((2-(2,6-diethylphenylamino)-2-oxoethyl)(2-ethoxy-2-oxoethyl)amino)acetic acid (L or Esterified EHIDA) reacted with Re(CO)5Br resulting in neutral but not negative Re(CO)3(L)  (Figure 5).Structures of Na/NEt4[Re(L2)(CO)3], NEt4[Re(L3)(CO)3] [11] EHIDA, L, and Re(CO)3(L).
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(a) The fluorescence intensity of Re(CO)3(L) (20 μM) (black line) and Re(CO)3(L) (20 μM) incubated with Aβ(1~40)  aggregates (red line) at the emission wavelength of 425 nm. (b) Equation (1): the nether line and Equation (2): the upper line. (c) The fluorescence intensity of EHIDA (0.4 mM) and emission wavelength (excitation wavelength is 280 nm).
(a)(b)(c)


## 3.4. Studies on Binding Aβ(1~40) Aggregates In Vitro

The fluorescence intensity of the mixture of Aβ(1~40)  aggregates and Re(CO)3(L) can be significantly stronger than the fluorescence intensity of Re(CO)3(L) only when the concentration of Re(CO)3(L) was more than 19 μM; for example, when 500 μL Re(CO)3(L) (20 μM) was added to the solution of Aβ(1~40) aggregates, there was an obvious enhance of fluorescence intensity at the emission wavelength of 425 nm (Figure 6(a)), oppositely, different from the visible fluorescence spectroscopy of EHIDA at 320 nm (Figure 6(c)). Upon excitation there occurs an intramolecular charge transfer of Re(CO)3(L) between the –NH–C=O group and rhenium, and then back charge transfer will be impossible. Upon addition of Aβ(1~40) aggregates, there was a visible enhance of fluorescence intensity at 425 nm, with no disturb of emission wavelength. Considering the breakage of the system of conjugated bonds due to the reorientation of the benzene ring and amide group of Re(CO)3(L) with respect to one another in PBS solution, the enhance of fluorescence intensity was mainly because of the breakage of the system of conjugated bonds being inhabited by the microsurrounding of β-amyloid aggregates when Aβ(1~40) aggregates was added [12]; as a result, an increased MLCT of Re(CO)3(L) then occurred. However, the dissociation constant of Thioflavin T equaled 2 μM  [8], lower than that of Re(CO)3(L), because of there is no obvious enhance of fluorescence intensity when the concentration of Re(CO)3(L) was little than 19 μM. Generally, probes which bind characteristically to β-amyloid fribils have more than one conjugationg system and electron-donating groups such as Me2N–, MeNH–, MeO–, and HO– in their molecular skeletons [13], opposite to the structure of Re(CO)3(L), indicative of a nonclassical intercalation of the complex binding to the Aβ(1~40) aggregates. The rather good linear relationship between the concentrations of Re(CO)3(L) and fluorescence intensity (equation (1), Figure 6(b)) was obtained by Microcal Origin 6.0:(1)Y=-9.51095×107+5.53571×106X(R:0.98151,SD:2.2583×106,N:6,P:5.09878×10-4),
where Y is the fluorescence intensity; X is the concentrations, from 19 to 24 μM; R is the linear correlation coefficient; SD is the standard error.When binding toβ-amyloid aggregates, there was also a great linear relationship between the concentrations of Re(CO)3(L) and fluorescence intensity (equation (2), Figure 6(b)):(2)Y=-9.74219×107+5.69714×106X(R:0.98544,SD:2.05598×106,N:6,P:3.16429×10-4),
where Y  is the fluorescence intensity; X is the concentrations of Re(CO)3(L), from 19 to 24 μM; R is the linear correlation coefficient; SD is the standard error.


## 4. Conclusion

In conclusion, the synthesis and X-ray measurement of Re(CO)3(L) was successfully completed, providing a novel crystal structure which was not similar to that of classical Re/Tc(I)(tricarbonyl)+  IDA derivatives. Evaluation of its binding affinity to Aβ(1~40) aggregates by the fluorescence method demonstrated that the binding characteristic was at micromolar level, which suggested that the structural modification should be achieved for future exploration of  99mTc(CO)3+  core labeled EHIDA derivatives as imaging agents for Aβ(1~40) plaques in vivo, and this work will encourage for further exploration of probes for β-amyloid plaques.



---

*Source: 702730-2009-11-08.xml*