# Development and Validation of Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method for Estimation of Satranidazole from Its Formulation

Authors: Harshal Ashok Pawar; Pooja Rasiklal Joshi
Journal: ISRN Chromatography
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

Satranidazole is a new nitroimidazole derivative with potent antiamoebic action and is available in market in the form of tablet and dry syrup either alone or in combination with Ofloxacin. The present study involves the development of simple, accurate, precise, and reproducible reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method for determination of Satranidazole from its granular dosage form. Isocratic elution at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min was employed on BDS Hypersil C18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5μm) column at 25°C temperature. The mobile phase consists of 0.16% v/v orthophosphoric acid solution, pH 3: acetonitrile in the ratio of 60 : 40 v/v. The UV detection wavelength was 320 nm, and 20 μL sample was injected. The retention time for Satranidazole was about 4.3 minutes. The method was validated for various parameters such as system suitability, precision, recovery, robustness, and ruggedness as per ICH guidelines. The validated RP-HPLC method was found to be specific, linear, precise, and accurate and can be successfully employed for the assay of Satranidazole taste masked granules coated with Eudragit E100 and marketed tablets.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Satranidazole (STZ) is a new nitroimidazole derivative with potent antiamoebic action. It is used in the treatment of intestinal and hepatic amoebiasis, giardiasis, trichomoniasis, and anaerobic infections. Its dose is 300 mg twice daily for 3–5 days in the treatment of amoebiasis and 600 mg as a single dose in the treatment of giardiasis and trichomoniasis. It is reported that Satranidazole exhibits significantly higher plasma concentrations than metronidazole and has a plasma elimination half-life of 1.01 hour which is significantly shorter than the corresponding metronidazole half-life of 3.62 hour [1]. Also Satranidazole is having better tolerability, absence of neurological, and disulfiram like reactions and it can be preferred in patients with susceptible neurological symptoms [2]. The structure of STZ is as shown in Figure 1. Literature survey revealed that there are various methods for individual determination of STZ by using RP-HPLC [3], HPLC [4], HPTLC [5, 6], and spectrophotometer [7] and also simultaneous estimation of STZ and Ofloxacin in tablet dosage form [8, 9]. Satranidazole is not official in any pharmacopoeia and no stability indicating method is reported for determination of Satranidazole in tablets and granular formulations. Hence, the present work was undertaken.Figure 1
Structure of Satranidazole.The objective of present study was to develop and validate an accurate, specific, and precise RP-HPLC method for assay of STZ in taste masked granular formulation and tablets. The developed method can be used for analysis of stability samples of Satranidazole tablets and granules.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Satranidazole was obtained as a gift sample from Alkem Laboratories, Mumbai. Eudragit E100 was obtained from Evonik Degussa, Mumbai. Satrogyl tablets (strength: 300 mg) were purchased from market. All the chemicals and reagents used were of analytical grade. HPLC grade water and solvents were used for HPLC analysis.


### 2.2. Instrumentation

A double-beam UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan) with 1.0 cm quartz cells was used for all absorbance measurements. An Agilent high performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC) equipped with Quaternary pump and UV detector was used for analysis of dissolution samples. Detection was made at 320 nm. Chemstation software was used. The chromatographic analysis was performed on a BDS Hypersil C18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5μm) column. Degassing of the mobile phase was done by using an Oscar ultrasonic bath sonicator (Mumbai, India).


### 2.3. Formulation Development of Taste Masked STZ Granules

Taste masked granules of STZ were formed by wet granulation method and were further coated with Eudragit E100 using conventional pan on laboratory scale. Excipients used were Avicel pH101, Pulverized sugar, Starch 1500, Aerosil, HPC-PG, and PVPK-30. The coating solution was prepared using Eudragit E100, macrogol 6000, talc, Aerosil, isopropyl alcohol, and water.


### 2.4. Preparation of Standard Solution

Stock solution was prepared by dissolving 50 mg of Satranidazole in 50 mL methanol and was further diluted with mobile phase to obtain standard solution of 40μg/mL concentration. The solution was filtered through 0.45 μm nylon filter.


### 2.5. Preparation of Sample Solution

The sample solution was prepared by adding granules equivalent to 20 mg of Satranidazole in methanol. The dispersion was sonicated for 30 min and was then filtered. The resultant solution was further diluted with mobile phase to get 40μg/mL of test solution. The solution was filtered through 0.45 μm nylon filter.


### 2.6. Method Development (Optimization of Chromatographic Parameters)

For developing the method, a systematic study of the effect of various factors was undertaken by varying one parameter at a time and keeping all other conditions constant. Method development consists of selecting the appropriate wavelength and choice of stationary and mobile phase. The spectrum of diluted solutions of Satranidazole in mobile phase was recorded separately on UV-spectrophotometer. The peak of maximum absorbance wavelength was observed. The spectra of the Satranidazole showed that the wavelength was found to be 320 nm as represented in Figure2.Figure 2
UV-spectrum of STZ.The HPLC parameters were optimized on trial and error basis. The selection of stationary phase depends upon the chemical nature of the sample, solubility, and the molecular weight. Satranidazole is water insoluble compound and hence reverse phase columns was selected. Among C8 and C18, BDS Hypersil C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5μm) was selected. Various combinations of methanol, acetonitrile, orthophosphoric acid, ammonium dihydrogen phosphate, and triethylamine were tested. Mixture of acetonitrile, 0.16% v/v Orthophosphoric acid buffer solution, pH 3 (40 : 60 v/v), was selected as mobile phase. The 0.16% v/v Orthophosphoric acid buffer solution was prepared by dissolving 1.6 mL orthophosphoric acid in water and the pH of the solution was adjusted to 3.0 using triethylamine. Composition of mobile phase on the retention time of Satranidazole was thoroughly investigated. At this optimized concentration Satranidazole gave symmetric peak with short runtime. UV detection wavelength was 320 nm, flow rate was 1.0 mL/min, injection volume was 20 μL, with ambient temperature, runtime was 7 min, and retention time was about 4.3 min.


### 2.7. Validation of Proposed HPLC Method

The proposed method was validated as per ICH guidelines [10]. The assay method of Satranidazole was validated for linearity, precision, accuracy, specificity, robustness, and solution stability.


#### 2.7.1. Specificity

Blank and placebo solution was injected to check the specificity of method. The specificity of the method was evaluated by comparing the chromatograms of blank, placebo, standard, and sample.


#### 2.7.2. Linearity

Linearity was performed by preparing various concentrations of standard solution of Satranidazole in the range from 10 to 60μg/mL. Twenty microliters of each concentration was injected in duplicate into the HPLC system. The response was read at 320 nm, and the corresponding chromatograms were recorded. The regressions of the plots were computed by least square regression method.The LOQ and LOD were based on the standard deviation of the response and the slope of the constructed calibration curve as described in International Conference on Harmonization guidelines [10].


#### 2.7.3. Method Precision and Ruggedness (Intermediate Precision)

Precision of the method was performed as intraday precision and interday precision. To study the intraday precision, assay was performed on 6 doses of single batch of granules and the samples were analyzed by test method. Ruggedness was carried out by changing the person and conducting precision experiment at different days. The percent relative standard deviation (% RSD) was calculated.


#### 2.7.4. Recovery

The accuracy of the assay method was evaluated in triplicate at three concentration levels (80, 100, and 120%), and the percentage recoveries were calculated. The study was carried out in triplicate at 32, 40, and 48μg/mL using granules equivalent to 16, 20, and 24 mg, respectively.


#### 2.7.5. Robustness

Robustness was evaluated by changing the flow rate by ±0.2 mL, wavelength by ±2 nm, and temperature by ±5°C and analyzing the samples by making above changes in HPLC method. The factors of robustness study are summarized in Table1.Table 1
Factors of robustness study.
Parameter
Low
Nominal
High
Wavelength (nm)
318
320
322
Flow rate (mL/min)
0.8
1
1.2
Temperature (°C)
20
25
30


#### 2.7.6. System Suitability

System suitability testing is used to verify that the precision/reproducibility of the system is adequate for the analysis to be performed. Parameters such as theoretical plates, tailing factor, and reproducibility (% RSD for area of five replicates) were determined. Five replicate injections of the standard solution were made into HPLC system. The mean, SD, and % RSD were calculated.


#### 2.7.7. Solution Stability

The solutions stability was analyzed over a period of 24 hours, verifying the response of the standard and sample solution stored at room temperature.


#### 2.7.8. Forced Degradation Studies/Specificity

The study was intended to ensure the effective separation of Satranidazole and its degradation peaks of formulation ingredients at the retention time of Satranidazole. Forced degradation studies were performed to evaluate the stability indicating properties and specificity of the method.All solutions for use in stress studies were prepared at an initial concentration of 1 mg/mL of Satranidazole and refluxed for 30 min at 80°C. All samples were then diluted in mobile phase to give a final concentration of 40μg/mL and filtered before injection.Acid decomposition was carried out in 0.1 M HCl and alkaline degradation was conducted using 0.1 M NaOH and refluxed for 30 min at 80°C. After cooling the solutions were neutralized and diluted with mobile phase.Solutions for oxidative stress studies were prepared using 3% H2O2 at a concentration of 1 mg/mL of Satranidazole and after refluxation for 30 min at 80°C on the thermostat the sample solution was cooled and diluted accordingly with the mobile phase.For thermal stress testing, the drug solution (1 mg/mL) was heated in oven at 80°C for 30 min, cooled, and used. The drug solution (1 mg/mL) for photo stability testing was exposed to UV light for 4 h UV light chamber (365 nm) and analyzed.


#### 2.7.9. Market Sample Analysis

The solutions extracted from the marketed formulations were also injected into the HPLC system and the peak area of the chromatograms was noted. The proposed method was applied for the determination of STZ tablets (Satrogyl tablet, 300 mg).


## 2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Satranidazole was obtained as a gift sample from Alkem Laboratories, Mumbai. Eudragit E100 was obtained from Evonik Degussa, Mumbai. Satrogyl tablets (strength: 300 mg) were purchased from market. All the chemicals and reagents used were of analytical grade. HPLC grade water and solvents were used for HPLC analysis.


## 2.2. Instrumentation

A double-beam UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan) with 1.0 cm quartz cells was used for all absorbance measurements. An Agilent high performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC) equipped with Quaternary pump and UV detector was used for analysis of dissolution samples. Detection was made at 320 nm. Chemstation software was used. The chromatographic analysis was performed on a BDS Hypersil C18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5μm) column. Degassing of the mobile phase was done by using an Oscar ultrasonic bath sonicator (Mumbai, India).


## 2.3. Formulation Development of Taste Masked STZ Granules

Taste masked granules of STZ were formed by wet granulation method and were further coated with Eudragit E100 using conventional pan on laboratory scale. Excipients used were Avicel pH101, Pulverized sugar, Starch 1500, Aerosil, HPC-PG, and PVPK-30. The coating solution was prepared using Eudragit E100, macrogol 6000, talc, Aerosil, isopropyl alcohol, and water.


## 2.4. Preparation of Standard Solution

Stock solution was prepared by dissolving 50 mg of Satranidazole in 50 mL methanol and was further diluted with mobile phase to obtain standard solution of 40μg/mL concentration. The solution was filtered through 0.45 μm nylon filter.


## 2.5. Preparation of Sample Solution

The sample solution was prepared by adding granules equivalent to 20 mg of Satranidazole in methanol. The dispersion was sonicated for 30 min and was then filtered. The resultant solution was further diluted with mobile phase to get 40μg/mL of test solution. The solution was filtered through 0.45 μm nylon filter.


## 2.6. Method Development (Optimization of Chromatographic Parameters)

For developing the method, a systematic study of the effect of various factors was undertaken by varying one parameter at a time and keeping all other conditions constant. Method development consists of selecting the appropriate wavelength and choice of stationary and mobile phase. The spectrum of diluted solutions of Satranidazole in mobile phase was recorded separately on UV-spectrophotometer. The peak of maximum absorbance wavelength was observed. The spectra of the Satranidazole showed that the wavelength was found to be 320 nm as represented in Figure2.Figure 2
UV-spectrum of STZ.The HPLC parameters were optimized on trial and error basis. The selection of stationary phase depends upon the chemical nature of the sample, solubility, and the molecular weight. Satranidazole is water insoluble compound and hence reverse phase columns was selected. Among C8 and C18, BDS Hypersil C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5μm) was selected. Various combinations of methanol, acetonitrile, orthophosphoric acid, ammonium dihydrogen phosphate, and triethylamine were tested. Mixture of acetonitrile, 0.16% v/v Orthophosphoric acid buffer solution, pH 3 (40 : 60 v/v), was selected as mobile phase. The 0.16% v/v Orthophosphoric acid buffer solution was prepared by dissolving 1.6 mL orthophosphoric acid in water and the pH of the solution was adjusted to 3.0 using triethylamine. Composition of mobile phase on the retention time of Satranidazole was thoroughly investigated. At this optimized concentration Satranidazole gave symmetric peak with short runtime. UV detection wavelength was 320 nm, flow rate was 1.0 mL/min, injection volume was 20 μL, with ambient temperature, runtime was 7 min, and retention time was about 4.3 min.


## 2.7. Validation of Proposed HPLC Method

The proposed method was validated as per ICH guidelines [10]. The assay method of Satranidazole was validated for linearity, precision, accuracy, specificity, robustness, and solution stability.


### 2.7.1. Specificity

Blank and placebo solution was injected to check the specificity of method. The specificity of the method was evaluated by comparing the chromatograms of blank, placebo, standard, and sample.


### 2.7.2. Linearity

Linearity was performed by preparing various concentrations of standard solution of Satranidazole in the range from 10 to 60μg/mL. Twenty microliters of each concentration was injected in duplicate into the HPLC system. The response was read at 320 nm, and the corresponding chromatograms were recorded. The regressions of the plots were computed by least square regression method.The LOQ and LOD were based on the standard deviation of the response and the slope of the constructed calibration curve as described in International Conference on Harmonization guidelines [10].


### 2.7.3. Method Precision and Ruggedness (Intermediate Precision)

Precision of the method was performed as intraday precision and interday precision. To study the intraday precision, assay was performed on 6 doses of single batch of granules and the samples were analyzed by test method. Ruggedness was carried out by changing the person and conducting precision experiment at different days. The percent relative standard deviation (% RSD) was calculated.


### 2.7.4. Recovery

The accuracy of the assay method was evaluated in triplicate at three concentration levels (80, 100, and 120%), and the percentage recoveries were calculated. The study was carried out in triplicate at 32, 40, and 48μg/mL using granules equivalent to 16, 20, and 24 mg, respectively.


### 2.7.5. Robustness

Robustness was evaluated by changing the flow rate by ±0.2 mL, wavelength by ±2 nm, and temperature by ±5°C and analyzing the samples by making above changes in HPLC method. The factors of robustness study are summarized in Table1.Table 1
Factors of robustness study.
Parameter
Low
Nominal
High
Wavelength (nm)
318
320
322
Flow rate (mL/min)
0.8
1
1.2
Temperature (°C)
20
25
30


### 2.7.6. System Suitability

System suitability testing is used to verify that the precision/reproducibility of the system is adequate for the analysis to be performed. Parameters such as theoretical plates, tailing factor, and reproducibility (% RSD for area of five replicates) were determined. Five replicate injections of the standard solution were made into HPLC system. The mean, SD, and % RSD were calculated.


### 2.7.7. Solution Stability

The solutions stability was analyzed over a period of 24 hours, verifying the response of the standard and sample solution stored at room temperature.


### 2.7.8. Forced Degradation Studies/Specificity

The study was intended to ensure the effective separation of Satranidazole and its degradation peaks of formulation ingredients at the retention time of Satranidazole. Forced degradation studies were performed to evaluate the stability indicating properties and specificity of the method.All solutions for use in stress studies were prepared at an initial concentration of 1 mg/mL of Satranidazole and refluxed for 30 min at 80°C. All samples were then diluted in mobile phase to give a final concentration of 40μg/mL and filtered before injection.Acid decomposition was carried out in 0.1 M HCl and alkaline degradation was conducted using 0.1 M NaOH and refluxed for 30 min at 80°C. After cooling the solutions were neutralized and diluted with mobile phase.Solutions for oxidative stress studies were prepared using 3% H2O2 at a concentration of 1 mg/mL of Satranidazole and after refluxation for 30 min at 80°C on the thermostat the sample solution was cooled and diluted accordingly with the mobile phase.For thermal stress testing, the drug solution (1 mg/mL) was heated in oven at 80°C for 30 min, cooled, and used. The drug solution (1 mg/mL) for photo stability testing was exposed to UV light for 4 h UV light chamber (365 nm) and analyzed.


### 2.7.9. Market Sample Analysis

The solutions extracted from the marketed formulations were also injected into the HPLC system and the peak area of the chromatograms was noted. The proposed method was applied for the determination of STZ tablets (Satrogyl tablet, 300 mg).


## 2.7.1. Specificity

Blank and placebo solution was injected to check the specificity of method. The specificity of the method was evaluated by comparing the chromatograms of blank, placebo, standard, and sample.


## 2.7.2. Linearity

Linearity was performed by preparing various concentrations of standard solution of Satranidazole in the range from 10 to 60μg/mL. Twenty microliters of each concentration was injected in duplicate into the HPLC system. The response was read at 320 nm, and the corresponding chromatograms were recorded. The regressions of the plots were computed by least square regression method.The LOQ and LOD were based on the standard deviation of the response and the slope of the constructed calibration curve as described in International Conference on Harmonization guidelines [10].


## 2.7.3. Method Precision and Ruggedness (Intermediate Precision)

Precision of the method was performed as intraday precision and interday precision. To study the intraday precision, assay was performed on 6 doses of single batch of granules and the samples were analyzed by test method. Ruggedness was carried out by changing the person and conducting precision experiment at different days. The percent relative standard deviation (% RSD) was calculated.


## 2.7.4. Recovery

The accuracy of the assay method was evaluated in triplicate at three concentration levels (80, 100, and 120%), and the percentage recoveries were calculated. The study was carried out in triplicate at 32, 40, and 48μg/mL using granules equivalent to 16, 20, and 24 mg, respectively.


## 2.7.5. Robustness

Robustness was evaluated by changing the flow rate by ±0.2 mL, wavelength by ±2 nm, and temperature by ±5°C and analyzing the samples by making above changes in HPLC method. The factors of robustness study are summarized in Table1.Table 1
Factors of robustness study.
Parameter
Low
Nominal
High
Wavelength (nm)
318
320
322
Flow rate (mL/min)
0.8
1
1.2
Temperature (°C)
20
25
30


## 2.7.6. System Suitability

System suitability testing is used to verify that the precision/reproducibility of the system is adequate for the analysis to be performed. Parameters such as theoretical plates, tailing factor, and reproducibility (% RSD for area of five replicates) were determined. Five replicate injections of the standard solution were made into HPLC system. The mean, SD, and % RSD were calculated.


## 2.7.7. Solution Stability

The solutions stability was analyzed over a period of 24 hours, verifying the response of the standard and sample solution stored at room temperature.


## 2.7.8. Forced Degradation Studies/Specificity

The study was intended to ensure the effective separation of Satranidazole and its degradation peaks of formulation ingredients at the retention time of Satranidazole. Forced degradation studies were performed to evaluate the stability indicating properties and specificity of the method.All solutions for use in stress studies were prepared at an initial concentration of 1 mg/mL of Satranidazole and refluxed for 30 min at 80°C. All samples were then diluted in mobile phase to give a final concentration of 40μg/mL and filtered before injection.Acid decomposition was carried out in 0.1 M HCl and alkaline degradation was conducted using 0.1 M NaOH and refluxed for 30 min at 80°C. After cooling the solutions were neutralized and diluted with mobile phase.Solutions for oxidative stress studies were prepared using 3% H2O2 at a concentration of 1 mg/mL of Satranidazole and after refluxation for 30 min at 80°C on the thermostat the sample solution was cooled and diluted accordingly with the mobile phase.For thermal stress testing, the drug solution (1 mg/mL) was heated in oven at 80°C for 30 min, cooled, and used. The drug solution (1 mg/mL) for photo stability testing was exposed to UV light for 4 h UV light chamber (365 nm) and analyzed.


## 2.7.9. Market Sample Analysis

The solutions extracted from the marketed formulations were also injected into the HPLC system and the peak area of the chromatograms was noted. The proposed method was applied for the determination of STZ tablets (Satrogyl tablet, 300 mg).


## 3. Results and Discussion

No stability indicating method is available in the official compendia using HPLC for analyzing Satranidazole in dosage forms till now. The present proposed method was compared with the reported methods in the literature and shown in Table2. The complete separation of the analytes was accomplished in less than 7 min and the method can be successfully applicable to perform long-term and accelerate stability studies of Satranidazole formulations.Table 2
Comparison of the performance characteristics of the present method with the published methods.
S. number
Method/mobile phase
Column/stationary phase
Wavelength (nm)
Retention time (min)
Linearity range
Application
Reference number
1
RP-HPLC/acetonitrile: 0.025 Mammonium phosphate buffer: 1.0%orthophosphoric acid (65 : 35 : 5)
Isocratic ODS C18 (250 × 4.6 mm i.d., 5μm) column
318
5.637
5–40μg/mL
Pharmaceutical dosage forms
[3]
2
HPLC/20 mM potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate: acetonitrile (60 : 40) containing 0.1%acetic acid
Inertsil ODS 3V, (250 × 4.6 mm, 5μm)
318
5.4
0.05–15.00μg/mL
Plasma samples
[4]
4
HPTLC/chloroform-methanol, 10 + 0.5 (v/v)
TLC aluminium plates precoated with silica gel 60F-254
317
—
200 and 1000 ng.
STZ tablets
[5]
5
HPTLC/toluene: acetonitrile (60 : 40, v/v)
TLC aluminium plates precoated with silica gel 60F-254
314
—
100–500 ng/spot
Bulk drug and formulations
[6]
7
Spectrophotometric estimation:Method A: absorption maxima methodMethod B: first order derivative spectroscopyMethod C: area under curve method
—
Method A-320, Method B-290, and Method C-325—315 nm
—
5–35μg/mL for Method A and 5–40 μg/mL for Method B and Method C
STZ tablet formulation
[7]
9
Simultaneous estimation of Ofloxacin and STZRP-HPLC/20 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate: acetonitrile in the ratio of 60 : 40 (v/v) containing 0.1% glacial acetic acid
Kromasil C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5μm)
318
Ofloxacin ~ 2.29STZ ~ 4.80
1.5 to 3.6μg/mL and 1.0 to 2.4 μg/mL,  STZ and Ofloxacin, respectively
Ofloxacin and STZ tablets
[8]
10
Simultaneous estimation of Ofloxacin and STZRP-HPLC/acetonitrile: phosphate buffer (pH3) in ratio of 35 : 65 (v/v)
HiQSil C18W (250 mm × 4.6 mm i.d., 5μm)
296 nmFor Ofloxacin and 320 nm for STZ.
Ofloxacin-2.85STZ-6.28,
5–50μg/mL,  STZ and Ofloxacin
Ofloxacin and STZ tablets
[9]
11
RP-HPLC/orthophosphoric acid buffer, pH 3: acetonitrile (60 : 40) (v/v)
Hypersil C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5μm)
320 nm
4.3
10 to 60 ppm
Stability indicating method
Present workThe concentration of acetonitrile and buffer was optimized to give symmetric peak with short run time. The mobile phase Orthophosphoric acid buffer, pH 3 (adjusted using triethylamine), Acetonitrile (60 : 40), was found to be better solvent system. Under optimized chromatographic conditions as mentioned above, a steady baseline was recorded, when standard solutions of STZ were injected and the chromatograms were recorded. The retention time of STZ was found to be about 4.3 min which allowed rapid determination of STZ in developed granular dosage form. This procedure was repeated for the sample solutions of taste masked granules of STZ. The peak area of standard solutions and sample solutions was calculated and % assay values were determined.There was no interference of placebo and blank solution peaks at the retention time of STZ in standard and sample chromatogram. Retention time of STZ was not affected. The representative chromatograms of blank, placebo, standard and sample are shown in Figures3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively.Figure 3
Chromatogram of blank solution.Figure 4
Chromatogram of placebo solution.Figure 5
Chromatogram of standard solution.Figure 6
Chromatogram of sample solution.The linearity was performed in triplicate. The calibration curve was found to be linear over the concentration range of 10–60μg/mL and the regression equation obtained was y=44.203x+50.893 with correlation coefficient of 0.999. The LOD was found to be 1.52 μg/mL and the LOQ was found to be 4.62 μg/mL. Linearity graph is shown in Figure 7.Figure 7
Linearity curve of STZ.The results of method precision and intermediate precision (Ruggedness) are summarized in Table3. The % RSD value was found to be less than 2 indicating that the method is precise and rugged.Table 3
Results of precision study.
Replicates
Method precisionDay-1analyst-1(% assay)
Intermediate precisionDay-2analyst-2(% assay)
Assay-1
99.93
101.41
Assay-2
101.26
100.28
Assay-3
99.8
98.89
Assay-4
101.73
99.22
Assay-5
101.93
98.82
Assay-6
98.4
101.81
Average
100.5083
100.0717
Standard deviation (SD)
1.3682
1.30726
% relative standard deviation (% RSD)
1.3612
1.3063
Average
100.29
Standard deviation (SD)
1.2960
% relative standard deviation (% RSD)
1.2923Recovery experiments were done to determine the accuracy of the method. The results are shown in Table4. The data indicated good reproducibility.Table 4
Results of recovery studies.
Sr. number
Levels (%)
Granules equivalent toX mg of STZ added X mg
Amount of STZ recovered (mg)
% recovery*
% relative standard deviation (% RSD)
1
80
16
15.9597
99.69
0.4965
2
100
20
20.4382
102.155
0.745
3
120
24
24.3959
101.555
0.7119
*Mean of three determinations.It was observed that there were no marked changes in chromatograms and the method was found to be reliable during normal usage due to small changes in some analytical parameters like change in wavelength, flow rate, and temperature, which demonstrated that the developed method was robust in nature. Table5 represents the results of robustness study.Table 5
Results of robustness study.
Chromatographic conditions
Normal
Variation
% assay
% relative standard deviation (% RSD)
Wavelength (nm)
320
318
100.00
0.5939
322
101.01
0.63
Column temperature (°C)
25
20
98.25
0.2734
30
100.26
0.2101
Flow rate (mL/min)
1
0.8
100.295
0.6133
1.2
100.535
0.6541The standard solution was used as a system suitability solution. The acceptance criteria for system suitability study are as follows. Relative standard deviation (% RSD) of the peak area responses for STZ from five standard solution injections should not be not more than 2.0%. The tailing factor and theoretical plate counts in standard solution should not be more than 2.0 and less than 2000, respectively.The theoretical plates obtained were 8477 (more than 2000) and tailing factor was 1.37 (less than 2) for the STZ peak. The % RSD for five replicate injections was found to be less than 2. The results of system suitability study are represented in Table6.Table 6
Summary of system suitability results.
Determination
Retention time
Area
Theoretical plates
Tailing factor
1
4.299
1499.1
8440
1.3780
2
4.315
1486.8
8512
1.4000
3
4.313
1495.9
8399
1.3658
4
4.315
1525.3
8595
1.3770
5
4.314
1492
8441
1.3658
Mean
4.3112
1499.8
8477.4
1.3773
Standard deviation (SD)
0.0068
14.964
77.2936
0.0139
% relative standard deviation (% RSD)
0.1593
0.9977
0.9117
1.0141It was found that during the acidic degradation one major degradant was observed at retention time 3.991, whereas in base degradation two degradants were observed at retention times 3.228 and 3.383, without interfering the elution of drug peak (about 4.3 mins). No significant degradation was observed during heat, UV, and H2O2 degradation. The results of forced degradation studies are shown in Table 7.Table 7
Results of forced degradation studies.
Degradation mechanism
STZ main peak retention time (min)
Degradation peak retention time (min)
Acid hydrolysis
4.378
3.991
Base hydrolysis
4.369
3.228 and 3.383
H2O2 oxidation
4.266
No peak
UV radiation
4.273
No peak
Heat
4.30
No peakSolution stability data indicated that the solution was stable for 24 hours at 25°C. The result of assay of the marketed tablet of STZ is shown in Table8.Table 8
Analysis of STZ commercial formulation.
Sample number
Formulation
Labeled claim (mg)
Amount found (mg)
Recovery (%)
1
Satrogyl tablets
300
294.63
98.21The statistical evaluation of the proposed method revealed good linearity, reproducibility, and its validation for different parameters.


## 4. Conclusion

The previously mentioned developed HPLC method helps in accurate quantitative determination of STZ in taste masked STZ granules as well as tablets. It includes easy method for mobile phase preparation by using simple reagents and solvents. The method was found to be rapid as the retention time of STZ was about 4.3 min. The method was found to be linear, precise, accurate, stability indicating, specific, and reproducible from the results of validation. The above stated method can be successfully used for the assay of drug from its granular and tablet formulations in routine analysis.



---

*Source: 689218-2014-01-12.xml*