# Adsorption of Eu(III) on oMWCNTs: Effects of pH, Ionic Strength, Solid-Liquid Ratio and Water-Soluble Fullerene

Authors: P. Liu; J. Wang; W. Qi; Zh. Li; JJ. Bi; WS. Wu
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

The influences of pH, ionic strength, solid-liquid ratio,C60CCOOH2n, and C60(OH)n on Eu(III) adsorption onto the oxidation multiwalled carbon nanotubes (oMWCNTs) were studied by using batch technique. The dynamic process showed that the adsorption of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs could be in equilibrium for about 17 h and matched the quasi-second-order kinetics model. The sorption process was influenced strongly by pH changes and ionic strength. In the pH range of 1.0 to 4.0, the adsorption ratio increased with the increasing of pH values, then the adsorption of Eu(III) was almost saturated in the pH range of 4.0 to 10.0, and the adsorption ratio reached about 90%. The adsorption ratio decreased with the increasing of ionic strength. C60CCOOH22 could promote the adsorption process obviously, but C60(OH)n  competed with Eu(III) for the adsorption sites, thus leading to the reducing of Eu(III) adsorption onto oMWCNTs. In the presence of C60CCOOH2n or C60(OH)n, the adsorption of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs could be affected obviously by solid-liquid ratio and the initial concentration of Eu(III).


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The behavior of lanthanides and actinides has received much attention in nuclear waste management [1, 2]. Eu(III) is a trivalent lanthanide ion, and it is also a trivalent actinide chemical element homologue. A large number of Eu(III) exposure in the environment can cause great harm to people’s health and life. Thus, the adsorption and migration of Eu(III) on metal oxides and minerals have been studied extensively, and the investigations of their potential pollution towards the natural water and soil environment are of great importance. Xu et al. studied the adsorption of Eu(III) on TiO2 with the presence of organic matters in different pH values, which indicated its adsorption behavior strongly influenced by the pH changes, and the adsorption mechanism was attributed to the formation of the inner ring complexes [3]. Wang et al. studied the adsorption of Eu(III) on alumina, which was also influenced by the pH changes, and the reaction is a surface complexation reaction [4]. Li et al. studied the adsorption of Eu(III) on iron oxides; the adsorption of Eu(III) was significantly dependent on pH, temperature, and HA [5].The carbon nanotube is a kind of carbon allotrope with typical layered hollow structure, and it is considered to be a typical one-dimensional material. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) are the coaxial tubes formed by several layers to dozens by hexagonal array of carbon atoms, with hybridization of carbon atoms in the tube wall, which can be easily modified; in addition, the carbon atoms exist as SP2 hybridization in the carbon nanotubes and form the most stable chemical bond C=C covalent bond in nature [6]. Therefore, carbon nanotubes have excellent physiochemical property and versatile applications, especially in mechanics, electromagnetism, optics, electronics, catalysis, and composite materials fields, and have huge potential research value [7]. Due to its special structure, carbon nanotubes have large specific surface area and high chemical stability, and their surfaces can be functionalized easily [8], it is widely used in the adsorption process. Some researchers have done the study about metal ions (Pb(II), Ni(II), and Cd(II)) adsorbed onto oMWCNTs in detail [9–11]. For example, Deng et al. studied the adsorption mechanism of PFCs (perfluorinated compounds) on MWCNTs [12]; their results indicated that MWCNTs have extremely excellent adsorption properties. And Sheng et al. [13] studied the adsorption of Eu(III) onto titanate nanotubes in microscopic insights.Compared with experimental environment, the natural environment is more complicated [14]. There are few studies about the behavior of other organic materials on the adsorption of metal ions in the presence of carbon nanomaterials. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the effects of a variety of carbon nanomaterials coexisting on the adsorption of metal ions. In order to simulate the interactions of carbon nanomaterials with metal ions in a real environment, the organic matters are often selected as another study factors in the ternary system to study the adsorption of metal ions [15–19]. In our study, the water-soluble fullerene was selected as the third element of the adsorption system to study its effect on Eu(III) adsorbed onto carbon nanotubes.The fullerenes are following graphite, diamond, amorphous carbon, and another allotropes of carbon, which has broad applications in the gas storage, the field of optics, the polymer field, enhanced metals, superconducting field, battery materials, catalysts, and biological medical prospects [20]. As a fullerene, C60 is the cheapest and easiest to obtain, so C60 and its derivatives were used to investigate their properties in the current studies. Due to their large number of π electrons, fullerene is very easy to form π-π stacking with other aromatic materials [21, 22], then to affect its adsorption on metal ion or an organic. And adding the appropriate functional groups to the fullerene skeleton can improve the poor solubility [23]. Therefore, studying the effect of water-soluble fullerene on adsorption of Eu(III) onto carbon nanotubes can provide a new method for the study of trivalent lanthanides and actinides behavior, explore a variety of factors, and provide a theoretical basis for the long-lived radioactive waste disposal security issues.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

Multiwall carbon nanotubes (L. MWNTs-1030) materials, purity > 95% (amorphous carbon ≤ 3 wt%, ash content ≤ 0.2 wt%), with a diameter of 10–30 nm, the length of 1–10μm, specific surface area of 10–100 m2/g, were purchased from Shenzhen Nanotech Port Company. Oxidation multi-walled carbon nanotubes were made ​​by raw carbon nanotubes and concentrated nitric acid. First, 3 g MWCNTs were added into concentrated nitric acid (400 mL). The mixture was stirred at 80°C for 24 h then quenched with deionized water, and the product was collected. A mixture of concentrated nitric acid and concentrated sulfuric acid (1 : 3, V/V) (400 mL) was added to the above compound and refluxed for 48 h then washed with deionized water (pH ≈ 6) to gain the oxidation multi-walled carbon nanotubes (oxidized MWCNTs, oMWCNTs) [26].Fullerene (C60), purity > 99.9%, was purchased from Yongxin the fullerene Technology Co. Ltd. of Puyang City, Henan Province. The fullerene hydroxylation process was in accordance with the method of the literature [27]. In a 50 mL round bottom flask containing the benzene solution of C60 (1 mg/mL), then added sodium hydroxide solution (2 mL, 0.5 mol/L), 5 drops of 10% tetrabutylammonium hydroxide, and hydrogen peroxide (1 mL, 30%). The solution was stirred at room temperature for 12 h until the color of benzene solution changed from purple to colorless, and the aqueous solution changed from colorless to yellow-brown. The mixture was extracted to obtain a dark brown color of C60(OH)x(O)ysolution. After added methanol to the solution of C60(OH)x(O)y, the precipitation was occurred, then the precipitation was filtered, washed with water (pH<8), and dried under vacuum. C60(OH)nwas obtained [28].Fullerene (C60), purity > 99.9%, was purchased from Yongxin the fullerene Technology Co. Ltd. of Puyang City, Henan Province. The C60 and NaH were added into toluene, when the color of the mixture solution changed from purple to deep red, then added diethyl bromomalonate. The residue was dissolved in the toluene, and then added NaH (excess 20-fold than before). The solution was stirred at 80°C for 10 h under the protection of Ar gas and heating. Then, CH3OH was added to the solution to terminate the reaction immediately, and added 2 mol/L HCl. The precipitate was filtered, collected, and washed by toluene, 2 mol/L HCl, H2O, and benzene [29].Unless otherwise noted, materials were obtained from commercial suppliers and were used without further purification.


### 2.2. Batch Experiments

Determining the equilibrium time and the solid-liquid ratio, in a series of polyethylene centrifuge tube added a certain amount of oMWCNTs, NaCl and a known concentration EuCl3 solution, so that the various components of the system achieved the required concentration. The extremely small amount of HCl or NaOH solution can be added to the system to adjust the pH to a desired value. The samples were centrifuged 30min at 12000 r/min after shaking 72 h in constant temperature. Taking out a certain volume supernatant, the supernatant counts were measured by a liquid scintillation counter. The adsorption of Eu(III) on the oMWCNTs was calculated by before and after the adsorption of Eu(III) in the liquid phase concentration.


### 2.3. X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Analysis

In order to further analyze the molecular level information of the adsorbent material; the thermoelectric ESCALAB 250 spectrometer was used to identify the property of adsorbent material, the results were shown in Figure1. The C1s peaks of oMWCNTs samples were at about 285.0, 288.2, and 289.0 eV (Figure 1(a)), which were corresponding the C–C, CO, and COO, respectively [30]. And O1s peaks of oMWCNTs sample at about 532.1, 534.1, and 537.2 eV (Figure 1(b)) were indicated the OH, OH/CO, and COO/H2O, respectively [31]. C1s peaks of C60(OH)nat about 285.0 and 286.98 eV (Figure 1(c)) showed the C-C and COO, respectively O1s peak of C60(OH)nat 532.77 eV (Figure 1(d)) was assigned to bridging OH. C1s peak of C60(C(COOH)2)nat about 284.9 and 289.1 eV (Figure 1(e)) was corresponding the C–C and COO, respectively. O1s peak of C60(C(COOH)2)nat about 532.4 and 533.5 eV (Figure 1(f)) could be assigned to bridging OH and COO/H2O, respectively. The related peak areas are shown in Table 1.Table 1
The percentage of various functional groups on different carbon nanomaterials.
Material
oMWCNTs
C60(OH)n
C60(C(COOH)2)n
C–C (%)
60.143
40.991
83.279
CO (%)
16.098
21.555
—
COO (%)
8.783
—
—
Bridging OH (%)
8.575
17.739
16.721
Terminal OH/CO (%)
6.400
—
—The XPS of nanomaterials. (a) is the oMWCNTs C1s, (b) is oMWCNTs O1s, (c) isC60(OH)nC1s, (d) is C60(OH)nO1s, (e) is C60(C(COOH)2)nC1s, and (f) is C60(C(COOH)2)nO1s.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)


## 2.1. Materials

Multiwall carbon nanotubes (L. MWNTs-1030) materials, purity > 95% (amorphous carbon ≤ 3 wt%, ash content ≤ 0.2 wt%), with a diameter of 10–30 nm, the length of 1–10μm, specific surface area of 10–100 m2/g, were purchased from Shenzhen Nanotech Port Company. Oxidation multi-walled carbon nanotubes were made ​​by raw carbon nanotubes and concentrated nitric acid. First, 3 g MWCNTs were added into concentrated nitric acid (400 mL). The mixture was stirred at 80°C for 24 h then quenched with deionized water, and the product was collected. A mixture of concentrated nitric acid and concentrated sulfuric acid (1 : 3, V/V) (400 mL) was added to the above compound and refluxed for 48 h then washed with deionized water (pH ≈ 6) to gain the oxidation multi-walled carbon nanotubes (oxidized MWCNTs, oMWCNTs) [26].Fullerene (C60), purity > 99.9%, was purchased from Yongxin the fullerene Technology Co. Ltd. of Puyang City, Henan Province. The fullerene hydroxylation process was in accordance with the method of the literature [27]. In a 50 mL round bottom flask containing the benzene solution of C60 (1 mg/mL), then added sodium hydroxide solution (2 mL, 0.5 mol/L), 5 drops of 10% tetrabutylammonium hydroxide, and hydrogen peroxide (1 mL, 30%). The solution was stirred at room temperature for 12 h until the color of benzene solution changed from purple to colorless, and the aqueous solution changed from colorless to yellow-brown. The mixture was extracted to obtain a dark brown color of C60(OH)x(O)ysolution. After added methanol to the solution of C60(OH)x(O)y, the precipitation was occurred, then the precipitation was filtered, washed with water (pH<8), and dried under vacuum. C60(OH)nwas obtained [28].Fullerene (C60), purity > 99.9%, was purchased from Yongxin the fullerene Technology Co. Ltd. of Puyang City, Henan Province. The C60 and NaH were added into toluene, when the color of the mixture solution changed from purple to deep red, then added diethyl bromomalonate. The residue was dissolved in the toluene, and then added NaH (excess 20-fold than before). The solution was stirred at 80°C for 10 h under the protection of Ar gas and heating. Then, CH3OH was added to the solution to terminate the reaction immediately, and added 2 mol/L HCl. The precipitate was filtered, collected, and washed by toluene, 2 mol/L HCl, H2O, and benzene [29].Unless otherwise noted, materials were obtained from commercial suppliers and were used without further purification.


## 2.2. Batch Experiments

Determining the equilibrium time and the solid-liquid ratio, in a series of polyethylene centrifuge tube added a certain amount of oMWCNTs, NaCl and a known concentration EuCl3 solution, so that the various components of the system achieved the required concentration. The extremely small amount of HCl or NaOH solution can be added to the system to adjust the pH to a desired value. The samples were centrifuged 30min at 12000 r/min after shaking 72 h in constant temperature. Taking out a certain volume supernatant, the supernatant counts were measured by a liquid scintillation counter. The adsorption of Eu(III) on the oMWCNTs was calculated by before and after the adsorption of Eu(III) in the liquid phase concentration.


## 2.3. X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Analysis

In order to further analyze the molecular level information of the adsorbent material; the thermoelectric ESCALAB 250 spectrometer was used to identify the property of adsorbent material, the results were shown in Figure1. The C1s peaks of oMWCNTs samples were at about 285.0, 288.2, and 289.0 eV (Figure 1(a)), which were corresponding the C–C, CO, and COO, respectively [30]. And O1s peaks of oMWCNTs sample at about 532.1, 534.1, and 537.2 eV (Figure 1(b)) were indicated the OH, OH/CO, and COO/H2O, respectively [31]. C1s peaks of C60(OH)nat about 285.0 and 286.98 eV (Figure 1(c)) showed the C-C and COO, respectively O1s peak of C60(OH)nat 532.77 eV (Figure 1(d)) was assigned to bridging OH. C1s peak of C60(C(COOH)2)nat about 284.9 and 289.1 eV (Figure 1(e)) was corresponding the C–C and COO, respectively. O1s peak of C60(C(COOH)2)nat about 532.4 and 533.5 eV (Figure 1(f)) could be assigned to bridging OH and COO/H2O, respectively. The related peak areas are shown in Table 1.Table 1
The percentage of various functional groups on different carbon nanomaterials.
Material
oMWCNTs
C60(OH)n
C60(C(COOH)2)n
C–C (%)
60.143
40.991
83.279
CO (%)
16.098
21.555
—
COO (%)
8.783
—
—
Bridging OH (%)
8.575
17.739
16.721
Terminal OH/CO (%)
6.400
—
—The XPS of nanomaterials. (a) is the oMWCNTs C1s, (b) is oMWCNTs O1s, (c) isC60(OH)nC1s, (d) is C60(OH)nO1s, (e) is C60(C(COOH)2)nC1s, and (f) is C60(C(COOH)2)nO1s.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)


## 3. Results and Discussions

### 3.1. Adsorption Kinetics

#### 3.1.1. Effect of Equilibrium Time on Eu(III) Adsorption onto oMWCNTs

The influence of the shaking time on Eu(III) adsorption onto oMWCNTs is shown in Figure2. The adsorption ratio was increased with the increase of the shaking time. After 17 h, the adsorption ratio of Eu(III) was close to 100%; after that it was substantially unchanged. These results indicated that the adsorption of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs was a chemical adsorption process [10]. The 48 h was selected as the equilibrium time in the following experiments.Figure 2
Effect of equilibrium time on Eu(III) adsorption onto oMWCNTs.pH=3.00±0.05,m/V=0.0250g/L,T=(25±1)°C,CEu0=1.21×10-5mol/L.


#### 3.1.2. Pseudo-Second-Order Equation

Quasi-second-order kinetic equation linear expression is(1)tqt=1kqe2+tqe,
where qt and qe denote the time t and the equilibrium adsorption amount (mg/g) and k is the second-order rate constant (g·mg-1·min-1). Using this equation to fit the experimental data, the results as shown in Figure 3, quasi-second-order equation is y=0.00013x+0.00552, calculated by the slope and intercept of k=3.3214×10-3g/mg·min, the qe=0.7757mg/g and the linear correlation coefficient R2=0.9996 which is almost 1. These results showed that the adsorption of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs was keeping with the quasi-second-order kinetic model.Figure 3
Pseudo-second-order sorption kinetics plot for Eu(III).pH=3.00±0.05, m/V=0.0250g/L,T=(25±1)°C, CEu0=1.21×10-5mol/L.


### 3.2. Effect of pH on Eu(III) Adsorption onto oMWCNTs

The influence of different pH on the adsorption was shown in Figure4. Figure 4 shows that when the solid-liquid is 0.025 g/L and ionic strength is 0.1 mol/L(NaCl), the ratio of Eu(III) adsorption onto oMWCNTs is  influenced strongly by the pH. Figure 4 also shows the adsorption ratio of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs declines with the ionic strength increases, suggesting that the adsorption can be suppressed by ionic strength. Sheng et al. found that the adsorption rate of Th(IV) on raw diatomite increased rapidly to about 100% when the pH value changed from 2 to 4 and was influenced by the ionic strength strongly [13]. Wu et al., Guo et al., and Mingming et al. also found that the adsorption of Eu(III) on sodium bentonite and Na-attapulgite was effected by ionic strength and pH changes strongly [32–34]. The experimental results in this work further confirmed the previous results.Figure 4
Effect of pH on Eu(III) adsorption onto oMWCNTs.m/V=0.0250g/L,T=(25±1)°C, CEu0=1.21×10-5mol/L.WhenpH<1.5, the adsorption ratio was low and almost not changing with the pH increased. In the range pH of 1.5 to 4.0, the adsorption ratio increased rapidly, from 20% to about 90%. When pH>4.0, the adsorption ratio changed not so obviously indicating that the system was in equilibrium. Because the species distribution of Eu(III) can form a water-soluble carbonates at high pH, so the adsorption ratio cannot reach 100%.The effect of pH on Eu(III) adsorption onto the oMWCNTs could be explained by the surface charge and ionization degree of oMWCNTs. WhenpH<pHpzc, Eu3+ and oMWCNTs surface proton produces electrostatic repulsion, which prevents Eu3+ from being adsorbed onto oMWCNTs, resulting in a lower adsorption ratio of Eu(III). When pH>pHpzc, Eu3+ interacts with oMWCNTs surface proton by electrostatic attraction making more Eu(III) adsorbed onto oMWCNTs surface, increasing the adsorption ratio of Eu(III). The species changes of Eu(III) with pH in solution is another important influencing factor for the adsorption system. The thermodynamic data used to estimate the Eu(III) species distribution in the solution were listed in Table 2. As shown in Figure 5, when the initial concentration of Eu(III) is 1.21×10-5mol/L with background electrolyte (0.01 mol/L NaCl solution), the main existence forms are Eu3+, Eu(OH)2+, EuCl2+, EuCO3+, Eu(CO3)2-. When pH≤6.5, the main species is Eu3+. When pH>6.5, due to the impact of CO2, Eu(III) mainly exists as the forms of EuCO3+ and Eu(CO3)2-in solution, which have relatively low solubility in aqueous solution leading to increase Eu(III) content in the solid phase, so the adsorption ratio of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs maintains the maximum and no longer changes.Table 2
The thermodynamic constants used for species estimates [24, 25].
Reaction
log
K
H
2
O
↔
OH
-
+
H
+
-
13.8
E
u
3+
+
H
2
O
↔
[
Eu
(
OH
)
]
2+
+
H
+
-
7.64
E
u
3+
+
2
H
2
O
↔
[
Eu
(
OH
)
2
]
+
+
2
H
+
-
15.1
E
u
3+
+
3
H
2
O
↔
[
Eu
(
OH
)
3
]
0
+
3
H
+
-
23.7
E
u
3+
+
4
H
2
O
↔
[
Eu
(
OH
)
4
]
-
+
4
H
+
-
36.2
H
2
C
O
3
↔
C
O
3
2
-
+
2
H
+
-
17.43
E
u
3+
+
C
O
3
2
-
↔
[
EuC
O
3
]
+
8.1
E
u
3+
+
2C
O
3
2
-
↔
[
Eu
(
C
O
3
)
2
]
-
12.1
E
u
3+
+
C
l
-
↔
EuCl
2+
1.10
E
u
3+
+
2C
l
-
↔
EuC
l
2
+
1.50Figure 5
Relative species distribution of Eu(III).T=(25±1)°C, CEu0=1.21×10-5mol/L,PCO2=0.0038.


### 3.3. Effect of Solid-Liquid Ratio on Eu(III) Adsorption onto oMWCNTs

Figure6 shows that the adsorption ratio transformation of Eu(III) adsorption onto oMWCNTs increases with the increasing of oMWCNTs concentration. With the increasing of the solid solution ratio in the system, the adsorption ratio of Eu(III) is increasing until Eu(III) is adsorbed completely. While the percentage composition of oMWCNTs increases, the surface adsorption sites also increase, which can promote the adsorption of Eu(III). Figure 6 also shows the influence of different m/V value on the distribution coefficient Kd.Kd values can be estimated by Cs and Ce:
(2)Kd=Cs-CeCe·Vm,
where V is the volume of the solution (m/L) and m is the weight of solid (g). As shown in Figure 6, with the increasing of the solid-liquid ratio, Kd values also increase gradually, when the solid-liquid ratio exceeds 0.1 mL/g, Kd value declines slightly. Thus, it can be seen from that, Kd value depends on the solid content at low solid concentration, but when the solid content reaches a certain concentration, Kd value is never depend on the solid content. This phenomenon also presents in the adsorption system of the other metal ions and the different adsorbents [35, 36].Figure 6
Effect of solid-to-liquid ratio of Eu(III) adsorption onto oMWCNTs.pH=3.00±0.05,m/V=0.0250g/L,T=(25±1)°C, CEu0=1.21×10-5mol/L.


### 3.4. Effect ofC60(OH)n on Eu(III) Adsorption onto oMWCNTs

Figure7 shows the Eu(III) adsorption border changes in the present of different C60(OH)nconcentration. When the concentration of C60(OH)nis 250 mg/L, the adsorption capacity of Eu(III) on the oMWCNTs is about 10% at pH 2.5, but it arrives at about 28% at pH 7. While the concentration of C60(OH)nis 125 mg/L, the adsorption rate increases significantly, which rises from 20% at pH 2.5 to 38% at pH 6.8. Similarly, when the concentration of C60(OH)nis 45 mg/L, the adsorption of C60(OH)nreaches the maximum at the same pH value. These results show that the presence of C60(OH)ncan restrain the adsorption of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs. According to the literatures, in a ternary system, the organic material plays an important role in metal ions adsorbed onto oMWCNTs. It is mainly attributed to the ternary complex which was formed by metal ion, the organics, and the surface functional groups of oMWCNTs through hydrophobic interactions, electrostatic interactions, and hydrogen bonds [37, 38]. But C60(OH)ncan compete with Eu(III) for the surface adsorption sites of oMWCNTs, which could weaken the adsorption ratio of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs. With the concentration of C60(OH)nincreasing gradually, more and more C60(OH)nis connected to oMWCNTs. So C60(OH)ncould affect the surface properties of oMWCNTs as well as the adsorption sites, then the adsorption ratio of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs is decreased. For further understanding of the effect of C60(OH)non the adsorption system, changing the initial concentration of Eu(III) and solid-liquid ratio to observe the effects of different C60(OH)nconcentrations on Eu(III) adsorption onto oMWCNTs was investigated (Figures 8 and 9). It indicates that the Eu(III) is only adsorbed on oMWCNTs surface with no interaction with C60(OH)n. As shown in Figure 8, when the initial concentration of Eu(III) is 6.0822×10-6mol/L, the adsorption rate becomes smaller gradually with C60(OH)nconcentration increases. The result shows that Eu(III) is adsorbed by oMWCNTs before the interaction of oMWCNTs with C60(OH)ndue to the low concentration of Eu(III), Conversely, when the initial concentration of the Eu(III) is increased to 2.3082×10-5mol/L, under the same concentration of oMWCNTs and C60(OH)n, the adsorption ratio is increases gradually because the abundant Eu(III) is enough strong to compete with C60(OH)nfor oMWCNTs. Figure 9 shows that when the solid-liquid ratio is 0.0250 g/L or 0.0083 g/L, and the concentration of C60(OH)nis less than 150 mg/L, the adsorption ratio of Eu(III) declines sharply, and then with the increasing of C60(OH)n, the adsorption rate becomes slow and till to stable. However, when the solid-liquid ratio rises to 0.0500 g/L, the adsorption rate of Eu(III) is slowly decreased, but it is higher than that of the solid-liquid ratio is 0.0250 g/L and 0.0083 g/L. This is because that with the increasing of solid-liquid ratio, the available adsorption sites also increases, so more Eu(III) is adsorbed to oMWCNTs.Figure 7
Effect ofC60(OH)non the adsorption of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs. pH=3.00±0.05,m/V=0.025g/L,T=(25±1)°C, CEu0=1.21×10-5mol/L.Figure 8
Effect of Eu(III) andC60(OH)nconcentration on the adsorption of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs. pH=3.00±0.05,m/V=0.025g/L,T=(25±1)°C, CEu0=1.21×10-5mol/L.Figure 9
Effect of solid-liquid ratio andC60(OH)nconcentration on the adsorption of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs. pH=3.00±0.05,m/V=0.025g/L,T=(25±1)°C, CEu0=1.21×10-5mol/L.


### 3.5. Effect of C60(C(COOH)2)2 on Eu(III) Adsorption onto oMWCNTs

The effect of C60(C(COOH)2)2 on the adsorption of Eu(III) is shown in Figure 10. The presence of C60(C(COOH)2)2 promoted the adsorption of the Eu(III) onto the oMWCNTs in the pH range of 1.5 to 3.5 significantly, and the maximum adsorption ratio is observed at pH>3.5. Considering the ability of π-π stacking between C60(C(COOH)2)2 and oMWCNTs is less than that of C60(OH)n, and the space steric effect of C60(C(COOH)2)2 is stronger than that of C60(OH)n, so the adsorption capacity of C60(C(COOH)2)2 onto the surface of oMWCNTs is not as large as C60(OH)n, which provides more opportunities for Eu(III) to be adsorbed by oMWCNTs. Under the acidic environment, C60(C(COOH)2)2 is very easy to combine with H+ from the solution and oMWCNTs surface, so Eu(III) is adsorbed onto the surface of oMWCNTs more easily. Meanwhile, the presence of hydrolyzate of Eu(III) may also be another reason to increase the adsorption ratio.Figure 10
Effect ofC60(OH)non the adsorption of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs. pH=3.00±0.05,m/V=0.025g/L,T=(25±1)°C, CEu0=1.21×10-5mol/L.Similarly, changing the initial concentration of Eu(III) and the ratio of solid to liquid at pH3.00±0.05, the effect of C60(C(COOH)2)2 concentration on the adsorption ratio is shown in Figures 11 and 12. As shown in Figure 11, when the initial concentration of Eu(III) is 6.0822×10-6g/L, there are enough adsorption sites to be occupied by Eu(III), and the adsorption ratio can reach maximum value fast. However, when the initial concentration of Eu(III) is 2.3082×10-5g/L, the adsorption sites of oMWCNTs are occupied completely at absence of C60(C(COOH)2)2, and the adsorption ratio is low; but once the C60(C(COOH)2)2 is added, the C60(C(COOH)2)2 can improve Eu(III) adsorption onto oMWCNTs, thus the adsorption ratio is increased with the increasing of C60(C(COOH)2)2 concentration until to the maximum, and then maintains this level. As shown in Figure 12, for the low solid-liquid ratio, such as m/V=0.0083g/L or 0.025 g/L, the quantity of Eu(III) in the solution are so much more than the adsorption sites of oMWCNTs. After the adsorption process is in the equilibrium at the experimental conditions, the solid-liquid ratio is low, and the sorption ratio also is low. However, when the C60(C(COOH)2)2 presents at the adsorption system, the adsorption ratio is increased due to C60(C(COOH)2)2 can promote the adsorption of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs. And with the increasing of the concentration of C60(C(COOH)2)2, the adsorption ratio is increased till the Eu(III) adsorbed completely.Figure 11
Effect of Eu(III) initial concentrations and C60(C(COOH)2)2 concentrations on Eu(III) adsorption onto oMWCNTs. pH=3.00±0.05,m/V=0.025g/L,T=(25±1)°C, CEu0=1.21×10-5mol/L.Figure 12
Effect of oMWCNTs solid-liquid ratio and C60(C(COOH)2)2 concentrations on the adsorption of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs. pH=3.00±0.05,m/V=0.025g/L,T=(25±1)°C, CEu0=1.21×10-5mol/L.


## 3.1. Adsorption Kinetics

### 3.1.1. Effect of Equilibrium Time on Eu(III) Adsorption onto oMWCNTs

The influence of the shaking time on Eu(III) adsorption onto oMWCNTs is shown in Figure2. The adsorption ratio was increased with the increase of the shaking time. After 17 h, the adsorption ratio of Eu(III) was close to 100%; after that it was substantially unchanged. These results indicated that the adsorption of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs was a chemical adsorption process [10]. The 48 h was selected as the equilibrium time in the following experiments.Figure 2
Effect of equilibrium time on Eu(III) adsorption onto oMWCNTs.pH=3.00±0.05,m/V=0.0250g/L,T=(25±1)°C,CEu0=1.21×10-5mol/L.


### 3.1.2. Pseudo-Second-Order Equation

Quasi-second-order kinetic equation linear expression is(1)tqt=1kqe2+tqe,
where qt and qe denote the time t and the equilibrium adsorption amount (mg/g) and k is the second-order rate constant (g·mg-1·min-1). Using this equation to fit the experimental data, the results as shown in Figure 3, quasi-second-order equation is y=0.00013x+0.00552, calculated by the slope and intercept of k=3.3214×10-3g/mg·min, the qe=0.7757mg/g and the linear correlation coefficient R2=0.9996 which is almost 1. These results showed that the adsorption of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs was keeping with the quasi-second-order kinetic model.Figure 3
Pseudo-second-order sorption kinetics plot for Eu(III).pH=3.00±0.05, m/V=0.0250g/L,T=(25±1)°C, CEu0=1.21×10-5mol/L.


## 3.1.1. Effect of Equilibrium Time on Eu(III) Adsorption onto oMWCNTs

The influence of the shaking time on Eu(III) adsorption onto oMWCNTs is shown in Figure2. The adsorption ratio was increased with the increase of the shaking time. After 17 h, the adsorption ratio of Eu(III) was close to 100%; after that it was substantially unchanged. These results indicated that the adsorption of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs was a chemical adsorption process [10]. The 48 h was selected as the equilibrium time in the following experiments.Figure 2
Effect of equilibrium time on Eu(III) adsorption onto oMWCNTs.pH=3.00±0.05,m/V=0.0250g/L,T=(25±1)°C,CEu0=1.21×10-5mol/L.


## 3.1.2. Pseudo-Second-Order Equation

Quasi-second-order kinetic equation linear expression is(1)tqt=1kqe2+tqe,
where qt and qe denote the time t and the equilibrium adsorption amount (mg/g) and k is the second-order rate constant (g·mg-1·min-1). Using this equation to fit the experimental data, the results as shown in Figure 3, quasi-second-order equation is y=0.00013x+0.00552, calculated by the slope and intercept of k=3.3214×10-3g/mg·min, the qe=0.7757mg/g and the linear correlation coefficient R2=0.9996 which is almost 1. These results showed that the adsorption of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs was keeping with the quasi-second-order kinetic model.Figure 3
Pseudo-second-order sorption kinetics plot for Eu(III).pH=3.00±0.05, m/V=0.0250g/L,T=(25±1)°C, CEu0=1.21×10-5mol/L.


## 3.2. Effect of pH on Eu(III) Adsorption onto oMWCNTs

The influence of different pH on the adsorption was shown in Figure4. Figure 4 shows that when the solid-liquid is 0.025 g/L and ionic strength is 0.1 mol/L(NaCl), the ratio of Eu(III) adsorption onto oMWCNTs is  influenced strongly by the pH. Figure 4 also shows the adsorption ratio of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs declines with the ionic strength increases, suggesting that the adsorption can be suppressed by ionic strength. Sheng et al. found that the adsorption rate of Th(IV) on raw diatomite increased rapidly to about 100% when the pH value changed from 2 to 4 and was influenced by the ionic strength strongly [13]. Wu et al., Guo et al., and Mingming et al. also found that the adsorption of Eu(III) on sodium bentonite and Na-attapulgite was effected by ionic strength and pH changes strongly [32–34]. The experimental results in this work further confirmed the previous results.Figure 4
Effect of pH on Eu(III) adsorption onto oMWCNTs.m/V=0.0250g/L,T=(25±1)°C, CEu0=1.21×10-5mol/L.WhenpH<1.5, the adsorption ratio was low and almost not changing with the pH increased. In the range pH of 1.5 to 4.0, the adsorption ratio increased rapidly, from 20% to about 90%. When pH>4.0, the adsorption ratio changed not so obviously indicating that the system was in equilibrium. Because the species distribution of Eu(III) can form a water-soluble carbonates at high pH, so the adsorption ratio cannot reach 100%.The effect of pH on Eu(III) adsorption onto the oMWCNTs could be explained by the surface charge and ionization degree of oMWCNTs. WhenpH<pHpzc, Eu3+ and oMWCNTs surface proton produces electrostatic repulsion, which prevents Eu3+ from being adsorbed onto oMWCNTs, resulting in a lower adsorption ratio of Eu(III). When pH>pHpzc, Eu3+ interacts with oMWCNTs surface proton by electrostatic attraction making more Eu(III) adsorbed onto oMWCNTs surface, increasing the adsorption ratio of Eu(III). The species changes of Eu(III) with pH in solution is another important influencing factor for the adsorption system. The thermodynamic data used to estimate the Eu(III) species distribution in the solution were listed in Table 2. As shown in Figure 5, when the initial concentration of Eu(III) is 1.21×10-5mol/L with background electrolyte (0.01 mol/L NaCl solution), the main existence forms are Eu3+, Eu(OH)2+, EuCl2+, EuCO3+, Eu(CO3)2-. When pH≤6.5, the main species is Eu3+. When pH>6.5, due to the impact of CO2, Eu(III) mainly exists as the forms of EuCO3+ and Eu(CO3)2-in solution, which have relatively low solubility in aqueous solution leading to increase Eu(III) content in the solid phase, so the adsorption ratio of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs maintains the maximum and no longer changes.Table 2
The thermodynamic constants used for species estimates [24, 25].
Reaction
log
K
H
2
O
↔
OH
-
+
H
+
-
13.8
E
u
3+
+
H
2
O
↔
[
Eu
(
OH
)
]
2+
+
H
+
-
7.64
E
u
3+
+
2
H
2
O
↔
[
Eu
(
OH
)
2
]
+
+
2
H
+
-
15.1
E
u
3+
+
3
H
2
O
↔
[
Eu
(
OH
)
3
]
0
+
3
H
+
-
23.7
E
u
3+
+
4
H
2
O
↔
[
Eu
(
OH
)
4
]
-
+
4
H
+
-
36.2
H
2
C
O
3
↔
C
O
3
2
-
+
2
H
+
-
17.43
E
u
3+
+
C
O
3
2
-
↔
[
EuC
O
3
]
+
8.1
E
u
3+
+
2C
O
3
2
-
↔
[
Eu
(
C
O
3
)
2
]
-
12.1
E
u
3+
+
C
l
-
↔
EuCl
2+
1.10
E
u
3+
+
2C
l
-
↔
EuC
l
2
+
1.50Figure 5
Relative species distribution of Eu(III).T=(25±1)°C, CEu0=1.21×10-5mol/L,PCO2=0.0038.


## 3.3. Effect of Solid-Liquid Ratio on Eu(III) Adsorption onto oMWCNTs

Figure6 shows that the adsorption ratio transformation of Eu(III) adsorption onto oMWCNTs increases with the increasing of oMWCNTs concentration. With the increasing of the solid solution ratio in the system, the adsorption ratio of Eu(III) is increasing until Eu(III) is adsorbed completely. While the percentage composition of oMWCNTs increases, the surface adsorption sites also increase, which can promote the adsorption of Eu(III). Figure 6 also shows the influence of different m/V value on the distribution coefficient Kd.Kd values can be estimated by Cs and Ce:
(2)Kd=Cs-CeCe·Vm,
where V is the volume of the solution (m/L) and m is the weight of solid (g). As shown in Figure 6, with the increasing of the solid-liquid ratio, Kd values also increase gradually, when the solid-liquid ratio exceeds 0.1 mL/g, Kd value declines slightly. Thus, it can be seen from that, Kd value depends on the solid content at low solid concentration, but when the solid content reaches a certain concentration, Kd value is never depend on the solid content. This phenomenon also presents in the adsorption system of the other metal ions and the different adsorbents [35, 36].Figure 6
Effect of solid-to-liquid ratio of Eu(III) adsorption onto oMWCNTs.pH=3.00±0.05,m/V=0.0250g/L,T=(25±1)°C, CEu0=1.21×10-5mol/L.


## 3.4. Effect ofC60(OH)n on Eu(III) Adsorption onto oMWCNTs

Figure7 shows the Eu(III) adsorption border changes in the present of different C60(OH)nconcentration. When the concentration of C60(OH)nis 250 mg/L, the adsorption capacity of Eu(III) on the oMWCNTs is about 10% at pH 2.5, but it arrives at about 28% at pH 7. While the concentration of C60(OH)nis 125 mg/L, the adsorption rate increases significantly, which rises from 20% at pH 2.5 to 38% at pH 6.8. Similarly, when the concentration of C60(OH)nis 45 mg/L, the adsorption of C60(OH)nreaches the maximum at the same pH value. These results show that the presence of C60(OH)ncan restrain the adsorption of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs. According to the literatures, in a ternary system, the organic material plays an important role in metal ions adsorbed onto oMWCNTs. It is mainly attributed to the ternary complex which was formed by metal ion, the organics, and the surface functional groups of oMWCNTs through hydrophobic interactions, electrostatic interactions, and hydrogen bonds [37, 38]. But C60(OH)ncan compete with Eu(III) for the surface adsorption sites of oMWCNTs, which could weaken the adsorption ratio of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs. With the concentration of C60(OH)nincreasing gradually, more and more C60(OH)nis connected to oMWCNTs. So C60(OH)ncould affect the surface properties of oMWCNTs as well as the adsorption sites, then the adsorption ratio of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs is decreased. For further understanding of the effect of C60(OH)non the adsorption system, changing the initial concentration of Eu(III) and solid-liquid ratio to observe the effects of different C60(OH)nconcentrations on Eu(III) adsorption onto oMWCNTs was investigated (Figures 8 and 9). It indicates that the Eu(III) is only adsorbed on oMWCNTs surface with no interaction with C60(OH)n. As shown in Figure 8, when the initial concentration of Eu(III) is 6.0822×10-6mol/L, the adsorption rate becomes smaller gradually with C60(OH)nconcentration increases. The result shows that Eu(III) is adsorbed by oMWCNTs before the interaction of oMWCNTs with C60(OH)ndue to the low concentration of Eu(III), Conversely, when the initial concentration of the Eu(III) is increased to 2.3082×10-5mol/L, under the same concentration of oMWCNTs and C60(OH)n, the adsorption ratio is increases gradually because the abundant Eu(III) is enough strong to compete with C60(OH)nfor oMWCNTs. Figure 9 shows that when the solid-liquid ratio is 0.0250 g/L or 0.0083 g/L, and the concentration of C60(OH)nis less than 150 mg/L, the adsorption ratio of Eu(III) declines sharply, and then with the increasing of C60(OH)n, the adsorption rate becomes slow and till to stable. However, when the solid-liquid ratio rises to 0.0500 g/L, the adsorption rate of Eu(III) is slowly decreased, but it is higher than that of the solid-liquid ratio is 0.0250 g/L and 0.0083 g/L. This is because that with the increasing of solid-liquid ratio, the available adsorption sites also increases, so more Eu(III) is adsorbed to oMWCNTs.Figure 7
Effect ofC60(OH)non the adsorption of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs. pH=3.00±0.05,m/V=0.025g/L,T=(25±1)°C, CEu0=1.21×10-5mol/L.Figure 8
Effect of Eu(III) andC60(OH)nconcentration on the adsorption of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs. pH=3.00±0.05,m/V=0.025g/L,T=(25±1)°C, CEu0=1.21×10-5mol/L.Figure 9
Effect of solid-liquid ratio andC60(OH)nconcentration on the adsorption of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs. pH=3.00±0.05,m/V=0.025g/L,T=(25±1)°C, CEu0=1.21×10-5mol/L.


## 3.5. Effect of C60(C(COOH)2)2 on Eu(III) Adsorption onto oMWCNTs

The effect of C60(C(COOH)2)2 on the adsorption of Eu(III) is shown in Figure 10. The presence of C60(C(COOH)2)2 promoted the adsorption of the Eu(III) onto the oMWCNTs in the pH range of 1.5 to 3.5 significantly, and the maximum adsorption ratio is observed at pH>3.5. Considering the ability of π-π stacking between C60(C(COOH)2)2 and oMWCNTs is less than that of C60(OH)n, and the space steric effect of C60(C(COOH)2)2 is stronger than that of C60(OH)n, so the adsorption capacity of C60(C(COOH)2)2 onto the surface of oMWCNTs is not as large as C60(OH)n, which provides more opportunities for Eu(III) to be adsorbed by oMWCNTs. Under the acidic environment, C60(C(COOH)2)2 is very easy to combine with H+ from the solution and oMWCNTs surface, so Eu(III) is adsorbed onto the surface of oMWCNTs more easily. Meanwhile, the presence of hydrolyzate of Eu(III) may also be another reason to increase the adsorption ratio.Figure 10
Effect ofC60(OH)non the adsorption of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs. pH=3.00±0.05,m/V=0.025g/L,T=(25±1)°C, CEu0=1.21×10-5mol/L.Similarly, changing the initial concentration of Eu(III) and the ratio of solid to liquid at pH3.00±0.05, the effect of C60(C(COOH)2)2 concentration on the adsorption ratio is shown in Figures 11 and 12. As shown in Figure 11, when the initial concentration of Eu(III) is 6.0822×10-6g/L, there are enough adsorption sites to be occupied by Eu(III), and the adsorption ratio can reach maximum value fast. However, when the initial concentration of Eu(III) is 2.3082×10-5g/L, the adsorption sites of oMWCNTs are occupied completely at absence of C60(C(COOH)2)2, and the adsorption ratio is low; but once the C60(C(COOH)2)2 is added, the C60(C(COOH)2)2 can improve Eu(III) adsorption onto oMWCNTs, thus the adsorption ratio is increased with the increasing of C60(C(COOH)2)2 concentration until to the maximum, and then maintains this level. As shown in Figure 12, for the low solid-liquid ratio, such as m/V=0.0083g/L or 0.025 g/L, the quantity of Eu(III) in the solution are so much more than the adsorption sites of oMWCNTs. After the adsorption process is in the equilibrium at the experimental conditions, the solid-liquid ratio is low, and the sorption ratio also is low. However, when the C60(C(COOH)2)2 presents at the adsorption system, the adsorption ratio is increased due to C60(C(COOH)2)2 can promote the adsorption of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs. And with the increasing of the concentration of C60(C(COOH)2)2, the adsorption ratio is increased till the Eu(III) adsorbed completely.Figure 11
Effect of Eu(III) initial concentrations and C60(C(COOH)2)2 concentrations on Eu(III) adsorption onto oMWCNTs. pH=3.00±0.05,m/V=0.025g/L,T=(25±1)°C, CEu0=1.21×10-5mol/L.Figure 12
Effect of oMWCNTs solid-liquid ratio and C60(C(COOH)2)2 concentrations on the adsorption of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs. pH=3.00±0.05,m/V=0.025g/L,T=(25±1)°C, CEu0=1.21×10-5mol/L.


## 4. Conclusion

The effects and behavior of Eu(III) adsorption onto oMWCNTs are studied when the C60(C(COOH)2)2 or C60(OH)nis added. The adsorption of Eu(III) onto oMWCNTs is affected strongly by pH and ionic strength. The presence of C60(C(COOH)2)npromotes the changes of adsorption ratio obviously. However, C60(OH)ncompetes the adsorption sites with Eu(III), leading to reducing the adsorption ratio of Eu(III) adsorbed onto oMWCNTs.



---

*Source: 689214-2013-09-02.xml*