# Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Human Pregnancy: To Treat or Not to Treat?

Authors: Orna Diav-Citrin; Asher Ornoy
Journal: Obstetrics and Gynecology International
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are increasingly prescribed during pregnancy. The purpose of the present paper is to summarize and evaluate the current evidence for the risk/benefit analysis of SSRI use in human pregnancy. The literature has been inconsistent. Although most studies have not shown an increase in the overall risk of major malformations, several studies have suggested that SSRIs may be associated with a small increased risk for cardiovascular malformations. Others have noted associations between SSRIs and specific types of rare major malformations. In some studies, there appears to be a small increased risk for miscarriages, which may be associated with the underlying maternal condition. Neonatal effects have been described in up to 30% of neonates exposed to SSRIs late in pregnancy. Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn has also been described with an absolute risk of<1%. The risk associated with treatment discontinuation, for example, higher frequency of relapse and  increased risk of preterm delivery, should also be considered. The overall benefit of treatment seems to outweigh the potential risks.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are widely prescribed for the treatment of depression, anxiety, and other disorders. Estimates suggest that the lifetime risk for depression ranges between 10 and 25% with a peak prevalence occurring at childbearing age [1]. According to Evans et al., 9–14% of all pregnant women display signs of depression and/or have illnesses that fulfil research diagnostic criteria for depression [2]. The prevalence rates of depression during pregnancy are 7.4%, 12.8%, and 12.0%, for the first, second, and third trimesters, respectively [3]. A number of SSRIs were introduced since the 1980s, including fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, citalopram, and escitalopram. They have better efficacy, tolerability, and safety compared to first-generation antidepressants, for example, tricyclic antidepressants, and are safer in overdose. They exert their effects by inhibiting the presynaptic plasma membrane serotonin transporter. The serotonin transporter mediates the reuptake of serotonin into the presynaptic terminal; neuronal uptake is the primary process by which neurotransmission via 5-hydroxytryptamine (neuronal serotonin) is terminated. Thus, treatment with an SSRI initially blocks reuptake and results in enhanced and prolonged serotonergic neurotransmission. All SSRIs share a similar mechanism of action despite having different chemical structures. The use of antidepressants and anxiolytics has shifted from the domain of psychiatry to primary care, with the discovery of more selective and safer drugs. SSRI use in pregnancy has increased over the years [4–7]. In recent years the proportion of pregnancies with SSRI exposure in the USA is 6% [6, 7]. SSRIs readily cross the human placenta [8, 9]. In spite of the widespread use of SSRIs during pregnancy and the relative extensive literature available, there are conflicting views on the safety of these drugs during pregnancy. The purpose of the present traditional literature review is to summarize and evaluate the current evidence for the risk benefit analysis of SSRI use in human pregnancy.


## 2. Human Studies on SSRIs in Pregnancy

### 2.1. Congenital Anomalies (see  Table1)

Table 1
SSRIs in human pregnancy.
StudyDesignSample sizeSSRIResultsCommentsPastuszak et al., [10]Prospective comparative multicentre cohort studyn=128FluoxetineNo increase in the rate of major malformationsSmall numbersChambers et al., [11]Prospective comparative cohort studyn=228,   n=101 (with physical examination)FluoxetineNo increase in the risk of major anomalies, higher incidence of 3 or more minor anomalies 15.5% versus 6.5%,P=0.03Physical examination by a single dysmorphologistMcElhatton et al., [12]Prospective comparative collaborative ENTIS studyn=689  antidepressantsFluoxetinen=96 Fluvoxamine n=66 Paroxetine  n=3No increase in the rate of congenital anomaliesSmall numbersGoldstein et al., [13]Prospective registry, historic controlsn=769FluoxetineNo increase in the rate of congenital anomaliesManufacturer’s data, spontaneous reportsWilton et al., [14]Postmarketing surveySSRIs 187Paroxetinen=63 Fluoxetine n=52 Sertraline n=51 Fluvoxamine n=21No increase in the rate of congenital anomaliesSmall numbersKulin et al., [15]Prospective comparative multicentre cohort study“New” SSRIs 267Sertralinen=147 Paroxetine n=97Fluvoxamine n=26No increase in the risk of major congenital anomaliesEricson et al.,a [16]Swedish Medical Birth Registry, initial reportSSRIs:n=531Citalopramn=375 Paroxetine n=122 Sertraline n=34 Fluoxetine n=16No increase in the rate of congenital anomaliesIncomplete drug reportingUnfred et al., [47]Prospective comparative cohort studyn=101ParoxetineIncreased risk of congenital anomalies (4/96 (4.2%) 1/195 (0.5%)P=0.04) no patternRate of anomalies in comparison group low, is, unpublished dataSimon et al., [17]Retrospective cohortSSRIs:n=185Fluoxetinen=129 Sertraline n=32 Paroxetine n=28>1 SSRI: someNo increase in the rate of congenital anomalies; however, the rate of cardiac malformations was 2.2% in the exposed group versus 0% in unexposedPrescription study, reliance on routinely collected clinical data, sample of live births rather than pregnancies, large number of comparisonsHendrick et al., [18]Review of obstetric and neonatal recordsSSRIs:n=138Fluoxetinen=73 Sertraline n=36 Paroxetine n=19Citalopram n=7Fluvoxamine n=3No increase in the rate of congenital anomaliesUncontrolled design, small numbersMalm et al.,c [19]Population-based cohort study, Finnish registriesSSRI:n=1398Citalopramn=554 Fluoxetine n=525 Paroxetine n=152 Sertraline n=118 Fluvoxamine n=65No increase in the rate of congenital anomaliesPrescription study, data on dose not providedSivojelezova et al., [20]Prospective comparative cohort studyn=125CitalopramNo increase in the rate of major malformationsWogelius et al.,b [29]Population-based cohort study, Danish registriesSSRIsn=1051NAIncreased risk for overall anomalies (Ad RR 1.34 (95% CI 1.00–1.79) early, 1.84 (95% CI 1.25–2.71 2nd-3rd m) cardiovascular 29%Data on specific SSRIs not provided, prescription studyWen et al., [21]Retrospective cohort studySSRIs:n=972Paroxetine by 1/3No increase in the risk of birth defectsPrescription studySchloemp et al., [22]Prospective comparative cohortn=119ParoxetineNo increase in the risk of birth defectsUnpublished dataVial et al., [23]Prospective comparative cohortn=683ParoxetineNo increase in the risk of birth defectsUnpublished dataKällén and Otterblad-Olausson,a    [30], a [31]Swedish Medical Birth Register, updatedSSRIs:n=6555Fluoxetinen=926Citalopram n=2701Paroxetine n=959Sertraline n=1906Fluvoxamine n=38Escitalopram n=72Increased risk of cardiovascular defects with paroxetine OR 1.63 95% CI 1.05–2.53 mostly septal defects 13/20Incomplete drug reporting, potential detection bias, multiple comparisonsDavis et al., [24]Retrospective case control studySSRIs:n=805Paroxetinen=182No increase in the risk of birth defectsPrescription studyBérard et al., [48]Retrospective nested case-control studyn=1403 antidepressantsParoxetinen=542n(>25 mg/d) = 143   other SSRIs n=443No increase in the rate of congenital anomalies, increased risk for overall and cardiac malformations in the high-dose (>25 mg/d) group (Ad OR 3.07 (95% CI 1.00–9.42))Prescription study, calculation of average daily dose affected by duration in the first trimesterAlwan et al.,  [39]Retrospective case-control studyCases:n=9622Control:s n=4092SSRIs     2.4% of cases 2.1% of controls, (sertraline 0.8%, fluoxetine 0.7%, paroxetine 0.5% citalopram 0.2%)Associations between any SSRI and craniosynostosis, paroxetine/sertraline and anencephaly, paroxetine and right ventricular outflow tract obstruction defects, omphalocele and gastroschisis—small absolute risksSmall numbers of exposed infants for individual anomalies, multiple comparisons, data on dosage unavailable, potential recall and selection biasesGSK/Cole et al., [49, 50]Retrospective epidemiologic studyn=4936antidepressantsParoxetinen=1020Increased risk for overall congenital anomalies for paroxetine (Ad OR 1.89 (95% CI 1.20–2.98))Manufacturers’ data from a large US insurer using data originally for a study on bupropion in pregnancyLouik et al.,  [40]Retrospective case-control study9849 infants with defects and 5860 withoutSSRIs: 2.7% of infants without malformations, 1.6–4.8% of infants with various malformationsAssociation between paroxetine and right ventricular outflow tract obstruction defects, clubfoot, undescended testes and NTDs, sertraline and omphalocele and septal defects—small absolute risksSmall number of exposed infants for individual anomalies, multiple comparisons, data on dosage unavailable, potential recall and selection biasesEinarson et al.,  [25]Prospective comparative cohort study 8 TISesn=1174ParoxetineNo increase in the risk of cardiac defects in the paroxetine group (0.7%) compared to controlsSpontaneously resolved cardiovascular defects not includedDiav-Citrin et al., [32]Prospective comparative cohort study 3 TISesSSRI:n=8091467 controlsParoxetinen=348 Fluoxetine n=253Increased Cr OR for cardiovascular anomalies after paroxetine 3.47 (95% CI 1.13–10.58) Ad OR 2.66 (95% CI 0.80–8.90), Cr OR 4.81 (95% CI 1.56–14.71) Ad OR 4.47 (95% CI 1.31–15.27) after fluoxetineAfter adjustment for potential confounders OR significant only for fluoxetine and cigarette smoking of 10 or more/day, septal defects considered major anomalies even when spontaneously closed, large confidence intervalsOberlander et al.,  [33]Population-based cohort study, Canada, BCSRIs:n=2625SRIs+BZ: n=968Controls: n=107,320SRIs:n=2625SRIs+BZ: n=968controls: n=107,320Increased risk of cardiovascular  (CV) defects after combined exposure to SRI and BZ,  increased risk for an ASD after SRI monotherapy, major anomalies after fluoxetine and BZClinical significance of the anomaly not verified, many septal defects minor and spontaneously resolve, attempt to control for confoundersPedersen et al.,b [34]Population-based cohort study, Danish registriesSSRIs:n=1370493,113 controlsFluoxetinen=348 Citalopram n=460 Paroxetine n=299 Sertraline n=259>1   SSRI n=193Increased prevalence of septal defects with sertraline (OR 3.25 (95% CI 1.21–8.75)) and citalopram (OR 2.52 (95% CI 1.04–6.10))Prescription study, potential selection bias, underlying condition potential confounder, information on malformation from hospital registry (more sensitive to severe and visible malformations)Wichman et al., [26]Retrospective controlled review of medical records at the Mayo ClinicSSRIs:n=80824,406 controlsCitalopramn=122 Venlafaxine n=53 Escitalopram n=8 Paroxetine n=134 Fluoxetine n=184 Sertraline n=296>1  SSRI n=113/808 (0.4%) had congenital heart disease after exposure to SSRIs compared with 2.05/24,406 (0.8%) without exposure to SSRIs (P=0.23)No review of SSRI exposure timing, of demographic or clinical information including use of other drugs, smoking, or alcohol use, data from physician prescription records. Small VSDs may be undetected soon after birth.Merlob et al., [35]Prospective comparative hospital-based studySSRIs:n=23567,636 controlsParoxetinen=92 Fluoxetine n=66 Citalopram n=43 Escitalopram n=13 Sertraline n=8 Fluvoxamine n=4 Venlafaxine n=9Non syndromic heart defects  (mild) identified by echocardiography among infants with murmur on 2nd-3rd day of life RR 2.17 (95% CI 1.07–4.39)Small sample size of exposed group, lack of data on potential confounders, ascertainment of SSRI use based on maternal report, no detection bias; all newborns with murmur examined by a pediatric cardiologist including echocardiography.Klieger-Grossmannet al., [27]Prospective comparative cohort studyn=213EscitalopramNo increased risk for anomaliesUnpublished dataKornum et al.,b [36]Population-based cohort study, Danish registries, updatedSSRIs:n=2064213,712 controlsCitalopramn=658 Fluoxetine n=472 Sertraline n=352 Paroxetine n=297 Escitalopram n=88>1  SSRI n=195SSRI use associated with increased risk of overall malformations (Ad OR 1.3 (95% CI 1.1–1.6)) and cardiac (Ad OR 1.7 (95% CI 1.1–2.5)), for specific SSRIs  increased risk for septal defects with sertraline (Ad OR 3.3 (95% CI 1.5–7.5))Prescription study, potential selection bias, underlying condition potential confounder, information on malformation from hospital registry (more sensitive to severe and visible malformations)Bakker et al., [37]Population-based case- control study, the Netherlandsn=678 with heart defects 615 controlsParoxetineNo significantly increased risk for heart defects overall (AOR 1.5 (95% CI 0.5–4.0)) increased risk for ASD with paroxetine in T1 (AOR 5.7 (95% CI 1.4–23.7))Small number of exposed infants for individual anomaliesReis and Källén,a   [38]Swedish Medical Birth Register, updatedSSRIs:n=10,170 1,062,190 controlsFluoxetinen=1522 Citalopram n=3950 Escitalopram n=153 Paroxetine n=1208 Sertraline n=3297 Fluvoxamine n=42 Unspecified n=86Increased risk  for  cystic kidney (n=9) with SSRIs (OR 2.39 (95% CI 1.09–4.54)), for  relatively severe malformation (OR 1.29 (95% CI 1.00–1.67)) with fluoxetine, for any cardiovascular defect (OR 1.66  (95% CI 1.09–2.53) 12/24 septal defects) and for hypospadias (n=9) (OR 2.45 (1.12–4.64)) with paroxetineProspective exposure information, largest dataset available. Incomplete drug reporting, potential detection bias, multiple comparisons, possible confounding by the underlying psychiatric condition, smoking, obesity, alcohol, folic acid, association with preexisting diabetes and hypertensionShechtman et al., [28]Prospective comparative cohort studyn=241Citalopram or escitalopramNo increased risk for anomaliesUnpublished dataMalm et al.,c    [41]Retrospective cohort, based on Finnish population-based registriesSSRIs:n=6,976Citalopramn=2,799 Fluoxetine n=1,818 Paroxetine n=968 Sertraline n=869 Escitalopram n=441 Fluvoxamine n=240Increased risk for isolated VSDs with fluoxetine (n=19) (Adj OR 2.03 (95% CI 1.28–3.21)) (0.5% absolute risk increase), for right ventricular outflow tract defects with paroxetine (n=3) (Adj OR 4.68 (95% CI 1.48–14.74)) (0.2% absolute risk increase), for NTDs with citalopram (n=8) (Adj OR 2.46 (95% CI 1.20–5.07))Large dataset, attempt to control for confounders (i.e., maternal age, parity, year of pregnancy, marital status, smoking, purchase of other psychiatric drugs, maternal prepregnancy diabetes). Large number of comparisons,  some associations based on small numbers, drug compliance and timing of exposure in pregnancy not confirmed, septal defects considered major anomalies even when spontaneously closedaFrom the same database of the Swedish Medical Birth Register, b from the same database of the Finnish registries, c from the same database of the Danish registries.A summary of studies on the use of SSRIs in human pregnancy is presented in Table1. Many studies on the use of SSRIs during pregnancy have not shown an increase in the overall risk of major malformations [10–28]. Several studies have suggested that the use of SSRIs, particularly paroxetine, may be associated with a small increased risk for cardiovascular malformations [29–38]. Other studies have noted associations between SSRIs in pregnancy and specific types of relatively rare major malformations (neural tube defects, craniosynostosis, omphalocele, or right ventricular outflow tract defects) [39–41]. Some of these studies are retrospective and burdened with recall and selection bias. The largest dataset with prospective exposure information available to date is from the Swedish Medical Birth Registry. Their initial report has been negative [16]. Later, increased risk of cardiovascular defects was observed with paroxetine, predominantly of septal defects [30, 31]. Recently, new associations were noted, for cystic kidney with SSRIs, for relatively severe malformations with fluoxetine, and for any cardiovascular defect and hypospadias with paroxetine [38]. Three recently published meta-analyses on paroxetine exposure in pregnancy and cardiovascular malformations have not been consistent [42–44]. In the meta-analysis published by Bar-Oz et al. [42], first trimester paroxetine exposure was associated with a significant increase in the risk of cardiac anomalies. Women using antidepressants in pregnancy were more likely to utilize ultrasound in pregnancy and postnatal echocardiograms compared with women who did not. In this study, significantly more women receiving paroxetine used the medication for anxiety or panic disorders compared to women using other SSRIs. Detection bias was suggested as a contributing factor to the observed risk of cardiovascular malformations with paroxetine. In the meta-analysis published by O’Brien et al. [43], no increased risk of congenital malformations was associated with paroxetine. Cardiac malformation rates were similar and within population norms. In the meta-analysis published by Wurst et al. [44], there was an increased risk for combined cardiac defects and aggregated congenital defects with first trimester paroxetine use. Two opposing commentaries on this topic were recently published [45, 46]. The definition of cardiovascular malformations varied among studies, some including small septal defects, while others excluded them. The inconsistency across these studies may be explained by differences in study design, by confounding factors, for example, maternal underlying psychiatric disorder, coadministered medications, lifestyle factors (smoking, drinking), maternal BMI, and diabetes, or they may be spurious. Overall, there are over 33,000 reported pregnancy outcomes after prenatal exposure to various SSRIs.We have calculated the overall rate of major congenital anomalies and of cardiovascular anomalies in the published prospective studies after prenatal exposure to SSRIs, where rates were available [10–15, 20, 25, 32, 33] and found 3.8% (189/4920) and 0.9% (53/6094), respectively, both well within their baseline risk in the general population. It can be summarized that the majority of the prospective studies have not shown an increase in the overall risk of major malformations. The studies which have suggested that SSRIs may be associated with a small increased risk for malformations were particularly with paroxetine.


### 2.2. Judging the Evidence for SSRIs as Possible Causes of Major Malformations

Seven criteria for proof of human teratogenicity have been amalgamated by Shepard [51] and are presented in Table 2 and discussed as follows.(1)
Many of the studies with positive findings on SSRIs in pregnancy are prescription studies, and women may not have actually taken the drugs. Exact timing of exposure during sensitive periods is often problematic, although exposure preceded the outcome.(2)
There are several isolated studies with inconsistent findings of statistically significant associations. Confounding factors are often insufficiently controlled for. Many of the prospective studies are underpowered for associations between exposure and specific malformations. Many of the retrospective studies are burdened with potential biases. All studies considered here are observational. The relative risk even in positive studies is below six and the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval often close to one. The findings in regard to the type of malformations are inconsistent in the underlying studies and even in studies from the same database published at different time points.(3)
In the positive studies, there was some dominance of cardiovascular malformations, septal defects in some studies, and right ventricular outflow tract obstruction defects in others. In the case of SSRIs, particularly paroxetine; however, they were non-specific. In many of the large studies, diagnosis of malformations uses classification codes and lacks careful delineation of clinical cases.(4)
The fourth criterion is not relevant in the context of SSRIs. SSRIs are common exposures in pregnancy, and most of the described defects are also relatively common.(5)
Animal reproductive studies in rats and rabbits administered paroxetine [52], fluoxetine [53], or sertraline [54] during organogenesis did not show a teratogenic effect.(6)
There is evidence based on mouse whole-embryo studies to suggest that serotonin plays a role in cardiovascular and craniofacial development [55–58]. Paroxetine 1 μM was shown to decrease serotonin-mediated proliferation of dissociated rat embryonic cardiac myocytes [59]. Rat whole-embryo culture results showed an increase in branchial bar fusion, but not cardiac malformations, after exposure to paroxetine at concentrations much higher than those achieved clinically [60]. It has been speculated that the observed malformations in vitro may be early ontogenetic indicators for infrequent cardiovascular anomalies observed in vivo. Fluoxetine was found to adversely affect cell viability and differentiation to cardiomyocytes at higher concentrations than those achieved clinically in a dose-dependent manner using mouse embryonic stem cell system [61]. SSRIs inhibit the serotonin transporter. However, developmental defects were not observed in mutant serotonin transporter knockout mice [62]. In another study, gross morphologic abnormalities were not seen in serotonin transporter knockout mice, but association was found with sudden death of the newborn mice in the first week after delivery [63]. Histologic analysis of heart sections of these mice showed that they develop cardiac fibrosis. In terms of biological plausibility, in vitro studies have been helpful in suggesting mechanistic information that adds to the plausibility of the suspected association, though in concentrations much higher than plasma concentrations in humans in clinical settings. However, as stated earlier, in vivo animal studies to date have not supported an association between in utero exposure to SSRIs and major anomalies.(7)
There is evidence for placental transfer of SSRIs.Table 2
Shepard's amalgamation of criteria for proof of human teratogenicity (Source: shepard, 1994 [51]) applied to SSRIs.
CriterionFulfillment by SSRIs(1) Proven exposure to agent at critical time(s) in prenatal development.No(2) Consistent findings by two or more epidemiologic studies of high quality:(a) Control of confounding factors(b) Sufficient numbers(c) Exclusion of positive or negative bias factorsNo(d) Prospective studies, if possible(e) Relative risk of six or more (?)(3) Careful delineation of the clinical cases. A specific defect or syndrome, if present, is very helpfulNo(4) Rare environmental exposure associated with rare defectNot applicable(5) Teratogenicity in experimental animalsNo(6) The association should make biological senseNo(7) Proof in an experimental system that the agent acts in an unaltered stateEvidence of placental transferNote: items (1), (2), and (3) or (1), (3), and (4) are essential criteria. Items (5), (6), and (7) are helpful but not essential.In summary, despite some troubling associations between SSRIs and major malformations, especially cardiovascular, the overall current scientific evidence has not fulfilled the criteria for proof of human teratogenicity of SSRIs. Despite having over 33,000 reported pregnancy outcomes after prenatal exposure to various SSRIs, the differences in the design of these studies and their conflicting results are confusing. One, therefore, wonders whether further well-designed epidemiologic studies, with sufficient power and good control of potential confounders will be helpful in verifying whether SSRIs are indeed associated with a small increased teratogenic risk, especially regarding cardiovascular anomalies. In our opinion, the current data do not support teratogenicity of SSRIs.


### 2.3. Miscarriage, Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR), and Preterm Delivery

Most studies did not specifically focus on the impact of SSRIs on the risk of miscarriage. It was often a secondary outcome without observing a significantly increased risk. There was an increase in the miscarriage risk in two meta-analyses [64, 65]. However, in the included prospective cohort studies, crude rates were reported, and the effect of earlier gestational age at contact, which is an important factor [66], was not corrected for. In two studies that specifically focused on the risk of miscarriage, an increased risk was found with the use of antidepressants during pregnancy [67, 68], SSRIs alone, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors alone, and combined use of antidepressants [68]. When looking at antidepressant use by type, paroxetine alone and venlafaxine alone were associated with increased miscarriage risk. Despite an attempt to adjust for psychiatric history, the possibility of confounding by underlying psychiatric disorder could not be ruled out.In a Finnish study, there was no increase in the rate of preterm delivery, SGA or LBW [19]. The risk of both low birth weight and preterm delivery was increased in infants who were born to mothers who had received SSRI therapy [17, 21]. Infants exposed to SSRIs had shorter gestation and lower birth weight compared to nonexposed infants [69]. The increased risk of low birth weight remained significant, even when maternal illness severity was accounted for. The adjusted OR for preterm delivery was doubled in SSRI-exposed women compared to two groups of women who had not used SSRIs during pregnancy, one with psychiatric history and another without [70]. In another study, the risk of preterm delivery was not significantly increased among SSRI users, but the risk of SGA offspring was increased among women who continued SSRI use beyond the first trimester [71]. In a study from the Quebec Pregnancy Registry, no association was found between SSRIs and the risk of SGA regardless of trimester of exposure [72]. In other studies, there was an increased risk for preterm delivery among women exposed to SSRIs in the second or third trimesters [38] or to antidepressants [73] with no increased risk for LBW or SGA. The underlying psychiatric disorder is a potential confounder in most of these studies.In summary, associations were found in some studies between the use of SSRIs during pregnancy and risk of miscarriage, IUGR, or preterm delivery. Most of these studies are potentially confounded by the gestational age at initial contact and the underlying psychiatric disorder.


### 2.4. Neonatal Effects

Neonatal symptoms have been described initially following prenatal exposure to fluoxetine [74] and later on after exposure to paroxetine and other SSRIs [75–81]. Neonatal toxicity or discontinuation (withdrawal, abstinence) syndromes associated with SSRIs are characterized by irritability, abnormal crying, tremor, and poor neonatal adaptation including respiratory distress, tachypnoea, jitteriness, lethargy, poor tone or colour, and, rarely, convulsions. The neonatal effects have been described in up to 30% of neonates exposed to SSRIs late in pregnancy [82]. Most symptoms are mild and transient.It can be concluded that SSRI use late in pregnancy, similar to many other psychotropic drugs, is associated with neonatal transient effects.


### 2.5. Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn

Some epidemiologic studies have suggested an association between maternal use of SSRIs late in pregnancy and an increased risk of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) [38, 83, 84]. In these studies the absolute risk of PPHN was <1%. In the study which used data from the Swedish Medical Birth Register [84], the eleven infants whose mothers reported the use of SSRI in pregnancy and had PPHN survived the neonatal period. Contrary to the above, other studies, possibly underpowered, did not find such an association [26, 85]. A recent study found PPHN to be associated with mode of delivery, specifically caesarean delivery prior to the onset of labour, but not with SSRI use in the second half of pregnancy [86].In summary, an absolute risk of <1% for PPHN in infants exposed to SSRIs cannot be excluded, although studies are not consistent.


### 2.6. Neurodevelopmental Effects

Most studies have focused on possible postnatal neurodevelopmental effects. Children of mothers exposed in pregnancy to fluoxetine or tricyclic antidepressants were neurodevelopmentally assessed and compared to an unexposed control group. Similar global IQ and language scores were found in the three groups [87, 88].  No significant differences in neurobehavioral scores were found between children whose mothers were taking fluoxetine during pregnancy and nonexposed children [89]. Normal development was observed in a small group of children exposed in pregnancy to citalopram and followed up to 1 year [90]. Infant developmental assessment done at 2 and 8 months of age revealed no significant differences between SSRI-exposed and unexposed infants [91]. Levels of internalizing or externalizing behaviours did not significantly differ between children prenatally exposed to SSRIs and unexposed [92, 93]. On the other hand, maternal depression and anxiety were associated with increased reports of internalizing and externalizing behaviours in their children.Mental developmental indexes were similar in children whose mothers were diagnosed with major depressive disorder treated or untreated in pregnancy. However, children exposed to SSRIs scored lower on the psychomotor developmental indexes and the motor quality factor of the behavioural rating scale compared to unexposed children [94]. In a follow-up study using a psychomotor developmental test (Boel), abnormal test was more frequent in children prenatally exposed to antidepressants compared to unexposed [95]. In another neurobehavioral assessment study, newborns prenatally exposed to SSRIs had abnormal outcomes including increased motor activity, fewer changes in behavioural state, and abnormal sleep patterns [96].Children’s developmental milestones were assessed using a questionnaire at 6 and 19 months of age. Second or third trimester exposure to antidepressants was associated with later gross motor developmental milestones, though still within normal range, compared to unexposed children [97].Children who had neonatal abstinence syndrome had similar mean overall developmental results compared to those who did not; however, they were more likely to have abnormal results on the social component of the Denver developmental test [98].A recent prospective study demonstrated that SSRIs during pregnancy affect the neurobehavioral development of the human fetus [99]. Fetuses exposed to SSRIs exhibited dose-related increased motor activity and disrupted sleep. The significance of the observed changes on postnatal development is unclear.In a recent population-based case-control study, a two-fold increased risk of autism spectrum disorders was found with prenatal exposure to SSRIs [100]. Further studies are needed to verify the suggested association.In summary, in most of the studies that focused on the possible neurodevelopmental effects of prenatal SSRI exposure, there is no conclusive evidence for an increased risk of adverse long-term effects.


### 2.7. Risk of Treatment Discontinuation

When evaluating the risk/benefit ratio of SSRI treatment in pregnancy, the risks associated with treatment discontinuation should also be considered. Abrupt discontinuation of psychotropic drugs in pregnancy is associated with physical and psychological adverse effects [101]. SSRI treatment discontinuation during pregnancy is associated with a higher frequency of relapse [102]. Depression is associated with an increased risk for preterm delivery [103–105]. The risk of preterm delivery increases with increasing severity of depression [106]. Treated women have lower depressive symptom scores and better functioning [105].  These risks should be a factor in the decision making in regard to treatment continuation during pregnancy.


## 2.1. Congenital Anomalies (see  Table1)

Table 1
SSRIs in human pregnancy.
StudyDesignSample sizeSSRIResultsCommentsPastuszak et al., [10]Prospective comparative multicentre cohort studyn=128FluoxetineNo increase in the rate of major malformationsSmall numbersChambers et al., [11]Prospective comparative cohort studyn=228,   n=101 (with physical examination)FluoxetineNo increase in the risk of major anomalies, higher incidence of 3 or more minor anomalies 15.5% versus 6.5%,P=0.03Physical examination by a single dysmorphologistMcElhatton et al., [12]Prospective comparative collaborative ENTIS studyn=689  antidepressantsFluoxetinen=96 Fluvoxamine n=66 Paroxetine  n=3No increase in the rate of congenital anomaliesSmall numbersGoldstein et al., [13]Prospective registry, historic controlsn=769FluoxetineNo increase in the rate of congenital anomaliesManufacturer’s data, spontaneous reportsWilton et al., [14]Postmarketing surveySSRIs 187Paroxetinen=63 Fluoxetine n=52 Sertraline n=51 Fluvoxamine n=21No increase in the rate of congenital anomaliesSmall numbersKulin et al., [15]Prospective comparative multicentre cohort study“New” SSRIs 267Sertralinen=147 Paroxetine n=97Fluvoxamine n=26No increase in the risk of major congenital anomaliesEricson et al.,a [16]Swedish Medical Birth Registry, initial reportSSRIs:n=531Citalopramn=375 Paroxetine n=122 Sertraline n=34 Fluoxetine n=16No increase in the rate of congenital anomaliesIncomplete drug reportingUnfred et al., [47]Prospective comparative cohort studyn=101ParoxetineIncreased risk of congenital anomalies (4/96 (4.2%) 1/195 (0.5%)P=0.04) no patternRate of anomalies in comparison group low, is, unpublished dataSimon et al., [17]Retrospective cohortSSRIs:n=185Fluoxetinen=129 Sertraline n=32 Paroxetine n=28>1 SSRI: someNo increase in the rate of congenital anomalies; however, the rate of cardiac malformations was 2.2% in the exposed group versus 0% in unexposedPrescription study, reliance on routinely collected clinical data, sample of live births rather than pregnancies, large number of comparisonsHendrick et al., [18]Review of obstetric and neonatal recordsSSRIs:n=138Fluoxetinen=73 Sertraline n=36 Paroxetine n=19Citalopram n=7Fluvoxamine n=3No increase in the rate of congenital anomaliesUncontrolled design, small numbersMalm et al.,c [19]Population-based cohort study, Finnish registriesSSRI:n=1398Citalopramn=554 Fluoxetine n=525 Paroxetine n=152 Sertraline n=118 Fluvoxamine n=65No increase in the rate of congenital anomaliesPrescription study, data on dose not providedSivojelezova et al., [20]Prospective comparative cohort studyn=125CitalopramNo increase in the rate of major malformationsWogelius et al.,b [29]Population-based cohort study, Danish registriesSSRIsn=1051NAIncreased risk for overall anomalies (Ad RR 1.34 (95% CI 1.00–1.79) early, 1.84 (95% CI 1.25–2.71 2nd-3rd m) cardiovascular 29%Data on specific SSRIs not provided, prescription studyWen et al., [21]Retrospective cohort studySSRIs:n=972Paroxetine by 1/3No increase in the risk of birth defectsPrescription studySchloemp et al., [22]Prospective comparative cohortn=119ParoxetineNo increase in the risk of birth defectsUnpublished dataVial et al., [23]Prospective comparative cohortn=683ParoxetineNo increase in the risk of birth defectsUnpublished dataKällén and Otterblad-Olausson,a    [30], a [31]Swedish Medical Birth Register, updatedSSRIs:n=6555Fluoxetinen=926Citalopram n=2701Paroxetine n=959Sertraline n=1906Fluvoxamine n=38Escitalopram n=72Increased risk of cardiovascular defects with paroxetine OR 1.63 95% CI 1.05–2.53 mostly septal defects 13/20Incomplete drug reporting, potential detection bias, multiple comparisonsDavis et al., [24]Retrospective case control studySSRIs:n=805Paroxetinen=182No increase in the risk of birth defectsPrescription studyBérard et al., [48]Retrospective nested case-control studyn=1403 antidepressantsParoxetinen=542n(>25 mg/d) = 143   other SSRIs n=443No increase in the rate of congenital anomalies, increased risk for overall and cardiac malformations in the high-dose (>25 mg/d) group (Ad OR 3.07 (95% CI 1.00–9.42))Prescription study, calculation of average daily dose affected by duration in the first trimesterAlwan et al.,  [39]Retrospective case-control studyCases:n=9622Control:s n=4092SSRIs     2.4% of cases 2.1% of controls, (sertraline 0.8%, fluoxetine 0.7%, paroxetine 0.5% citalopram 0.2%)Associations between any SSRI and craniosynostosis, paroxetine/sertraline and anencephaly, paroxetine and right ventricular outflow tract obstruction defects, omphalocele and gastroschisis—small absolute risksSmall numbers of exposed infants for individual anomalies, multiple comparisons, data on dosage unavailable, potential recall and selection biasesGSK/Cole et al., [49, 50]Retrospective epidemiologic studyn=4936antidepressantsParoxetinen=1020Increased risk for overall congenital anomalies for paroxetine (Ad OR 1.89 (95% CI 1.20–2.98))Manufacturers’ data from a large US insurer using data originally for a study on bupropion in pregnancyLouik et al.,  [40]Retrospective case-control study9849 infants with defects and 5860 withoutSSRIs: 2.7% of infants without malformations, 1.6–4.8% of infants with various malformationsAssociation between paroxetine and right ventricular outflow tract obstruction defects, clubfoot, undescended testes and NTDs, sertraline and omphalocele and septal defects—small absolute risksSmall number of exposed infants for individual anomalies, multiple comparisons, data on dosage unavailable, potential recall and selection biasesEinarson et al.,  [25]Prospective comparative cohort study 8 TISesn=1174ParoxetineNo increase in the risk of cardiac defects in the paroxetine group (0.7%) compared to controlsSpontaneously resolved cardiovascular defects not includedDiav-Citrin et al., [32]Prospective comparative cohort study 3 TISesSSRI:n=8091467 controlsParoxetinen=348 Fluoxetine n=253Increased Cr OR for cardiovascular anomalies after paroxetine 3.47 (95% CI 1.13–10.58) Ad OR 2.66 (95% CI 0.80–8.90), Cr OR 4.81 (95% CI 1.56–14.71) Ad OR 4.47 (95% CI 1.31–15.27) after fluoxetineAfter adjustment for potential confounders OR significant only for fluoxetine and cigarette smoking of 10 or more/day, septal defects considered major anomalies even when spontaneously closed, large confidence intervalsOberlander et al.,  [33]Population-based cohort study, Canada, BCSRIs:n=2625SRIs+BZ: n=968Controls: n=107,320SRIs:n=2625SRIs+BZ: n=968controls: n=107,320Increased risk of cardiovascular  (CV) defects after combined exposure to SRI and BZ,  increased risk for an ASD after SRI monotherapy, major anomalies after fluoxetine and BZClinical significance of the anomaly not verified, many septal defects minor and spontaneously resolve, attempt to control for confoundersPedersen et al.,b [34]Population-based cohort study, Danish registriesSSRIs:n=1370493,113 controlsFluoxetinen=348 Citalopram n=460 Paroxetine n=299 Sertraline n=259>1   SSRI n=193Increased prevalence of septal defects with sertraline (OR 3.25 (95% CI 1.21–8.75)) and citalopram (OR 2.52 (95% CI 1.04–6.10))Prescription study, potential selection bias, underlying condition potential confounder, information on malformation from hospital registry (more sensitive to severe and visible malformations)Wichman et al., [26]Retrospective controlled review of medical records at the Mayo ClinicSSRIs:n=80824,406 controlsCitalopramn=122 Venlafaxine n=53 Escitalopram n=8 Paroxetine n=134 Fluoxetine n=184 Sertraline n=296>1  SSRI n=113/808 (0.4%) had congenital heart disease after exposure to SSRIs compared with 2.05/24,406 (0.8%) without exposure to SSRIs (P=0.23)No review of SSRI exposure timing, of demographic or clinical information including use of other drugs, smoking, or alcohol use, data from physician prescription records. Small VSDs may be undetected soon after birth.Merlob et al., [35]Prospective comparative hospital-based studySSRIs:n=23567,636 controlsParoxetinen=92 Fluoxetine n=66 Citalopram n=43 Escitalopram n=13 Sertraline n=8 Fluvoxamine n=4 Venlafaxine n=9Non syndromic heart defects  (mild) identified by echocardiography among infants with murmur on 2nd-3rd day of life RR 2.17 (95% CI 1.07–4.39)Small sample size of exposed group, lack of data on potential confounders, ascertainment of SSRI use based on maternal report, no detection bias; all newborns with murmur examined by a pediatric cardiologist including echocardiography.Klieger-Grossmannet al., [27]Prospective comparative cohort studyn=213EscitalopramNo increased risk for anomaliesUnpublished dataKornum et al.,b [36]Population-based cohort study, Danish registries, updatedSSRIs:n=2064213,712 controlsCitalopramn=658 Fluoxetine n=472 Sertraline n=352 Paroxetine n=297 Escitalopram n=88>1  SSRI n=195SSRI use associated with increased risk of overall malformations (Ad OR 1.3 (95% CI 1.1–1.6)) and cardiac (Ad OR 1.7 (95% CI 1.1–2.5)), for specific SSRIs  increased risk for septal defects with sertraline (Ad OR 3.3 (95% CI 1.5–7.5))Prescription study, potential selection bias, underlying condition potential confounder, information on malformation from hospital registry (more sensitive to severe and visible malformations)Bakker et al., [37]Population-based case- control study, the Netherlandsn=678 with heart defects 615 controlsParoxetineNo significantly increased risk for heart defects overall (AOR 1.5 (95% CI 0.5–4.0)) increased risk for ASD with paroxetine in T1 (AOR 5.7 (95% CI 1.4–23.7))Small number of exposed infants for individual anomaliesReis and Källén,a   [38]Swedish Medical Birth Register, updatedSSRIs:n=10,170 1,062,190 controlsFluoxetinen=1522 Citalopram n=3950 Escitalopram n=153 Paroxetine n=1208 Sertraline n=3297 Fluvoxamine n=42 Unspecified n=86Increased risk  for  cystic kidney (n=9) with SSRIs (OR 2.39 (95% CI 1.09–4.54)), for  relatively severe malformation (OR 1.29 (95% CI 1.00–1.67)) with fluoxetine, for any cardiovascular defect (OR 1.66  (95% CI 1.09–2.53) 12/24 septal defects) and for hypospadias (n=9) (OR 2.45 (1.12–4.64)) with paroxetineProspective exposure information, largest dataset available. Incomplete drug reporting, potential detection bias, multiple comparisons, possible confounding by the underlying psychiatric condition, smoking, obesity, alcohol, folic acid, association with preexisting diabetes and hypertensionShechtman et al., [28]Prospective comparative cohort studyn=241Citalopram or escitalopramNo increased risk for anomaliesUnpublished dataMalm et al.,c    [41]Retrospective cohort, based on Finnish population-based registriesSSRIs:n=6,976Citalopramn=2,799 Fluoxetine n=1,818 Paroxetine n=968 Sertraline n=869 Escitalopram n=441 Fluvoxamine n=240Increased risk for isolated VSDs with fluoxetine (n=19) (Adj OR 2.03 (95% CI 1.28–3.21)) (0.5% absolute risk increase), for right ventricular outflow tract defects with paroxetine (n=3) (Adj OR 4.68 (95% CI 1.48–14.74)) (0.2% absolute risk increase), for NTDs with citalopram (n=8) (Adj OR 2.46 (95% CI 1.20–5.07))Large dataset, attempt to control for confounders (i.e., maternal age, parity, year of pregnancy, marital status, smoking, purchase of other psychiatric drugs, maternal prepregnancy diabetes). Large number of comparisons,  some associations based on small numbers, drug compliance and timing of exposure in pregnancy not confirmed, septal defects considered major anomalies even when spontaneously closedaFrom the same database of the Swedish Medical Birth Register, b from the same database of the Finnish registries, c from the same database of the Danish registries.A summary of studies on the use of SSRIs in human pregnancy is presented in Table1. Many studies on the use of SSRIs during pregnancy have not shown an increase in the overall risk of major malformations [10–28]. Several studies have suggested that the use of SSRIs, particularly paroxetine, may be associated with a small increased risk for cardiovascular malformations [29–38]. Other studies have noted associations between SSRIs in pregnancy and specific types of relatively rare major malformations (neural tube defects, craniosynostosis, omphalocele, or right ventricular outflow tract defects) [39–41]. Some of these studies are retrospective and burdened with recall and selection bias. The largest dataset with prospective exposure information available to date is from the Swedish Medical Birth Registry. Their initial report has been negative [16]. Later, increased risk of cardiovascular defects was observed with paroxetine, predominantly of septal defects [30, 31]. Recently, new associations were noted, for cystic kidney with SSRIs, for relatively severe malformations with fluoxetine, and for any cardiovascular defect and hypospadias with paroxetine [38]. Three recently published meta-analyses on paroxetine exposure in pregnancy and cardiovascular malformations have not been consistent [42–44]. In the meta-analysis published by Bar-Oz et al. [42], first trimester paroxetine exposure was associated with a significant increase in the risk of cardiac anomalies. Women using antidepressants in pregnancy were more likely to utilize ultrasound in pregnancy and postnatal echocardiograms compared with women who did not. In this study, significantly more women receiving paroxetine used the medication for anxiety or panic disorders compared to women using other SSRIs. Detection bias was suggested as a contributing factor to the observed risk of cardiovascular malformations with paroxetine. In the meta-analysis published by O’Brien et al. [43], no increased risk of congenital malformations was associated with paroxetine. Cardiac malformation rates were similar and within population norms. In the meta-analysis published by Wurst et al. [44], there was an increased risk for combined cardiac defects and aggregated congenital defects with first trimester paroxetine use. Two opposing commentaries on this topic were recently published [45, 46]. The definition of cardiovascular malformations varied among studies, some including small septal defects, while others excluded them. The inconsistency across these studies may be explained by differences in study design, by confounding factors, for example, maternal underlying psychiatric disorder, coadministered medications, lifestyle factors (smoking, drinking), maternal BMI, and diabetes, or they may be spurious. Overall, there are over 33,000 reported pregnancy outcomes after prenatal exposure to various SSRIs.We have calculated the overall rate of major congenital anomalies and of cardiovascular anomalies in the published prospective studies after prenatal exposure to SSRIs, where rates were available [10–15, 20, 25, 32, 33] and found 3.8% (189/4920) and 0.9% (53/6094), respectively, both well within their baseline risk in the general population. It can be summarized that the majority of the prospective studies have not shown an increase in the overall risk of major malformations. The studies which have suggested that SSRIs may be associated with a small increased risk for malformations were particularly with paroxetine.


## 2.2. Judging the Evidence for SSRIs as Possible Causes of Major Malformations

Seven criteria for proof of human teratogenicity have been amalgamated by Shepard [51] and are presented in Table 2 and discussed as follows.(1)
Many of the studies with positive findings on SSRIs in pregnancy are prescription studies, and women may not have actually taken the drugs. Exact timing of exposure during sensitive periods is often problematic, although exposure preceded the outcome.(2)
There are several isolated studies with inconsistent findings of statistically significant associations. Confounding factors are often insufficiently controlled for. Many of the prospective studies are underpowered for associations between exposure and specific malformations. Many of the retrospective studies are burdened with potential biases. All studies considered here are observational. The relative risk even in positive studies is below six and the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval often close to one. The findings in regard to the type of malformations are inconsistent in the underlying studies and even in studies from the same database published at different time points.(3)
In the positive studies, there was some dominance of cardiovascular malformations, septal defects in some studies, and right ventricular outflow tract obstruction defects in others. In the case of SSRIs, particularly paroxetine; however, they were non-specific. In many of the large studies, diagnosis of malformations uses classification codes and lacks careful delineation of clinical cases.(4)
The fourth criterion is not relevant in the context of SSRIs. SSRIs are common exposures in pregnancy, and most of the described defects are also relatively common.(5)
Animal reproductive studies in rats and rabbits administered paroxetine [52], fluoxetine [53], or sertraline [54] during organogenesis did not show a teratogenic effect.(6)
There is evidence based on mouse whole-embryo studies to suggest that serotonin plays a role in cardiovascular and craniofacial development [55–58]. Paroxetine 1 μM was shown to decrease serotonin-mediated proliferation of dissociated rat embryonic cardiac myocytes [59]. Rat whole-embryo culture results showed an increase in branchial bar fusion, but not cardiac malformations, after exposure to paroxetine at concentrations much higher than those achieved clinically [60]. It has been speculated that the observed malformations in vitro may be early ontogenetic indicators for infrequent cardiovascular anomalies observed in vivo. Fluoxetine was found to adversely affect cell viability and differentiation to cardiomyocytes at higher concentrations than those achieved clinically in a dose-dependent manner using mouse embryonic stem cell system [61]. SSRIs inhibit the serotonin transporter. However, developmental defects were not observed in mutant serotonin transporter knockout mice [62]. In another study, gross morphologic abnormalities were not seen in serotonin transporter knockout mice, but association was found with sudden death of the newborn mice in the first week after delivery [63]. Histologic analysis of heart sections of these mice showed that they develop cardiac fibrosis. In terms of biological plausibility, in vitro studies have been helpful in suggesting mechanistic information that adds to the plausibility of the suspected association, though in concentrations much higher than plasma concentrations in humans in clinical settings. However, as stated earlier, in vivo animal studies to date have not supported an association between in utero exposure to SSRIs and major anomalies.(7)
There is evidence for placental transfer of SSRIs.Table 2
Shepard's amalgamation of criteria for proof of human teratogenicity (Source: shepard, 1994 [51]) applied to SSRIs.
CriterionFulfillment by SSRIs(1) Proven exposure to agent at critical time(s) in prenatal development.No(2) Consistent findings by two or more epidemiologic studies of high quality:(a) Control of confounding factors(b) Sufficient numbers(c) Exclusion of positive or negative bias factorsNo(d) Prospective studies, if possible(e) Relative risk of six or more (?)(3) Careful delineation of the clinical cases. A specific defect or syndrome, if present, is very helpfulNo(4) Rare environmental exposure associated with rare defectNot applicable(5) Teratogenicity in experimental animalsNo(6) The association should make biological senseNo(7) Proof in an experimental system that the agent acts in an unaltered stateEvidence of placental transferNote: items (1), (2), and (3) or (1), (3), and (4) are essential criteria. Items (5), (6), and (7) are helpful but not essential.In summary, despite some troubling associations between SSRIs and major malformations, especially cardiovascular, the overall current scientific evidence has not fulfilled the criteria for proof of human teratogenicity of SSRIs. Despite having over 33,000 reported pregnancy outcomes after prenatal exposure to various SSRIs, the differences in the design of these studies and their conflicting results are confusing. One, therefore, wonders whether further well-designed epidemiologic studies, with sufficient power and good control of potential confounders will be helpful in verifying whether SSRIs are indeed associated with a small increased teratogenic risk, especially regarding cardiovascular anomalies. In our opinion, the current data do not support teratogenicity of SSRIs.


## 2.3. Miscarriage, Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR), and Preterm Delivery

Most studies did not specifically focus on the impact of SSRIs on the risk of miscarriage. It was often a secondary outcome without observing a significantly increased risk. There was an increase in the miscarriage risk in two meta-analyses [64, 65]. However, in the included prospective cohort studies, crude rates were reported, and the effect of earlier gestational age at contact, which is an important factor [66], was not corrected for. In two studies that specifically focused on the risk of miscarriage, an increased risk was found with the use of antidepressants during pregnancy [67, 68], SSRIs alone, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors alone, and combined use of antidepressants [68]. When looking at antidepressant use by type, paroxetine alone and venlafaxine alone were associated with increased miscarriage risk. Despite an attempt to adjust for psychiatric history, the possibility of confounding by underlying psychiatric disorder could not be ruled out.In a Finnish study, there was no increase in the rate of preterm delivery, SGA or LBW [19]. The risk of both low birth weight and preterm delivery was increased in infants who were born to mothers who had received SSRI therapy [17, 21]. Infants exposed to SSRIs had shorter gestation and lower birth weight compared to nonexposed infants [69]. The increased risk of low birth weight remained significant, even when maternal illness severity was accounted for. The adjusted OR for preterm delivery was doubled in SSRI-exposed women compared to two groups of women who had not used SSRIs during pregnancy, one with psychiatric history and another without [70]. In another study, the risk of preterm delivery was not significantly increased among SSRI users, but the risk of SGA offspring was increased among women who continued SSRI use beyond the first trimester [71]. In a study from the Quebec Pregnancy Registry, no association was found between SSRIs and the risk of SGA regardless of trimester of exposure [72]. In other studies, there was an increased risk for preterm delivery among women exposed to SSRIs in the second or third trimesters [38] or to antidepressants [73] with no increased risk for LBW or SGA. The underlying psychiatric disorder is a potential confounder in most of these studies.In summary, associations were found in some studies between the use of SSRIs during pregnancy and risk of miscarriage, IUGR, or preterm delivery. Most of these studies are potentially confounded by the gestational age at initial contact and the underlying psychiatric disorder.


## 2.4. Neonatal Effects

Neonatal symptoms have been described initially following prenatal exposure to fluoxetine [74] and later on after exposure to paroxetine and other SSRIs [75–81]. Neonatal toxicity or discontinuation (withdrawal, abstinence) syndromes associated with SSRIs are characterized by irritability, abnormal crying, tremor, and poor neonatal adaptation including respiratory distress, tachypnoea, jitteriness, lethargy, poor tone or colour, and, rarely, convulsions. The neonatal effects have been described in up to 30% of neonates exposed to SSRIs late in pregnancy [82]. Most symptoms are mild and transient.It can be concluded that SSRI use late in pregnancy, similar to many other psychotropic drugs, is associated with neonatal transient effects.


## 2.5. Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn

Some epidemiologic studies have suggested an association between maternal use of SSRIs late in pregnancy and an increased risk of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) [38, 83, 84]. In these studies the absolute risk of PPHN was <1%. In the study which used data from the Swedish Medical Birth Register [84], the eleven infants whose mothers reported the use of SSRI in pregnancy and had PPHN survived the neonatal period. Contrary to the above, other studies, possibly underpowered, did not find such an association [26, 85]. A recent study found PPHN to be associated with mode of delivery, specifically caesarean delivery prior to the onset of labour, but not with SSRI use in the second half of pregnancy [86].In summary, an absolute risk of <1% for PPHN in infants exposed to SSRIs cannot be excluded, although studies are not consistent.


## 2.6. Neurodevelopmental Effects

Most studies have focused on possible postnatal neurodevelopmental effects. Children of mothers exposed in pregnancy to fluoxetine or tricyclic antidepressants were neurodevelopmentally assessed and compared to an unexposed control group. Similar global IQ and language scores were found in the three groups [87, 88].  No significant differences in neurobehavioral scores were found between children whose mothers were taking fluoxetine during pregnancy and nonexposed children [89]. Normal development was observed in a small group of children exposed in pregnancy to citalopram and followed up to 1 year [90]. Infant developmental assessment done at 2 and 8 months of age revealed no significant differences between SSRI-exposed and unexposed infants [91]. Levels of internalizing or externalizing behaviours did not significantly differ between children prenatally exposed to SSRIs and unexposed [92, 93]. On the other hand, maternal depression and anxiety were associated with increased reports of internalizing and externalizing behaviours in their children.Mental developmental indexes were similar in children whose mothers were diagnosed with major depressive disorder treated or untreated in pregnancy. However, children exposed to SSRIs scored lower on the psychomotor developmental indexes and the motor quality factor of the behavioural rating scale compared to unexposed children [94]. In a follow-up study using a psychomotor developmental test (Boel), abnormal test was more frequent in children prenatally exposed to antidepressants compared to unexposed [95]. In another neurobehavioral assessment study, newborns prenatally exposed to SSRIs had abnormal outcomes including increased motor activity, fewer changes in behavioural state, and abnormal sleep patterns [96].Children’s developmental milestones were assessed using a questionnaire at 6 and 19 months of age. Second or third trimester exposure to antidepressants was associated with later gross motor developmental milestones, though still within normal range, compared to unexposed children [97].Children who had neonatal abstinence syndrome had similar mean overall developmental results compared to those who did not; however, they were more likely to have abnormal results on the social component of the Denver developmental test [98].A recent prospective study demonstrated that SSRIs during pregnancy affect the neurobehavioral development of the human fetus [99]. Fetuses exposed to SSRIs exhibited dose-related increased motor activity and disrupted sleep. The significance of the observed changes on postnatal development is unclear.In a recent population-based case-control study, a two-fold increased risk of autism spectrum disorders was found with prenatal exposure to SSRIs [100]. Further studies are needed to verify the suggested association.In summary, in most of the studies that focused on the possible neurodevelopmental effects of prenatal SSRI exposure, there is no conclusive evidence for an increased risk of adverse long-term effects.


## 2.7. Risk of Treatment Discontinuation

When evaluating the risk/benefit ratio of SSRI treatment in pregnancy, the risks associated with treatment discontinuation should also be considered. Abrupt discontinuation of psychotropic drugs in pregnancy is associated with physical and psychological adverse effects [101]. SSRI treatment discontinuation during pregnancy is associated with a higher frequency of relapse [102]. Depression is associated with an increased risk for preterm delivery [103–105]. The risk of preterm delivery increases with increasing severity of depression [106]. Treated women have lower depressive symptom scores and better functioning [105].  These risks should be a factor in the decision making in regard to treatment continuation during pregnancy.


## 3. Conclusion

Clinicians are faced with the difficult cost-benefit consideration of either making a recommendation to treat or not to treat maternal depression or anxiety with SSRIs in pregnancy. In the field of teratology, decisions on new medications during pregnancy often need to be made with insufficient human pregnancy experience on their safety. In the case of SSRIs in pregnancy, despite extensive available studies on their use, quality is more important than quantity, and data are still not conclusive.In summary, most studies on the use of SSRIs during pregnancy support that they are not major human teratogens. A small increased risk for cardiovascular anomalies, especially with paroxetine, cannot be excluded. There appears to be a small increased risk for miscarriages, which may be associated with the underlying maternal condition. Neonates of mothers treated with SSRIs should be closely followed up after delivery, as there is an increased risk of transient neonatal effects. There is no conclusive evidence for adverse long-term neurodevelopmental effects of prenatal SSRI exposure. Discontinuation of treatment may pose risks, for example, higher frequency of relapse and increased risk of preterm delivery. Hence, the general benefit of treatment seems to outweigh the potential small risk of untoward effects on the embryo, fetus, or neonate.



---

*Source: 698947-2011-12-10.xml*