# Relationship between Subjective Oral Health Status and Lifestyle in Elderly People: A Cross-Sectional Study in Japan

Authors: Masami Yoshioka; Daisuke Hinode; Masaaki Yokoyama; Aiichiro Fujiwara; Yasuhiko Sakaida; Kenji Toyoshima
Journal: ISRN Dentistry
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

Objective. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between subjective oral health status and lifestyle in elderly people living in Japan. Methods. Subjects were 5383 inhabitants of the Kagawa Prefecture, Japan, at the age of 75–100. Records of the number of remaining teeth and the data from self-reported questionnaire were analyzed statistically. Results. Remaining teeth were significantly correlated to “no current smoking,” while not related to other lifestyle. On the other hand, “subjective masticatory ability” defined as a condition allowing chewing all foods well was related to favorable lifestyles. “Subjective masticatory ability” was also related to “not feeling stress,” “no deviated food habit” as well as to other good oral health conditions. A logistic regression analysis for “remaining teeth more than 20” revealed a significant relationship between “no current smoking” (OR = 1.582) and “no alcohol drinking” (OR = 0.851). Regarding “subjective masticatory ability,” all favorable lifestyles analyzed in this study were found to be significant positive factors. Conclusions. “Subjective masticatory ability” seems to be strongly associated with favorable lifestyles. Therefore, it can be suggested that “subjective masticatory ability” might be a good landmark for quality of life of elderly people in addition to the number of remaining teeth.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

From the time the “8020 Movement” was proposed by Japan Dental Association and approved by the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare in 1989 in Japan; the concept that maintaining more than 20 teeth at 80 years old leads to healthy and long life has been recognized throughout the country. Several studies conducted with “8020 achievers” reported that “8020 achievers” are better than “8020 nonachievers” for not only masticatory ability but also general physical conditions, including bone mineral density (BMI), grip strength, and the duration of balance test [1]. The food intake survey demonstrated that the “8020 achievers” ate a larger variety of food, although these foods were with less kilocalories and lower levels of carbohydrate [2].Several epidemiological studies showed that the number of remaining teeth is closely related with smoking habit [3, 4] and with education level [4, 5].A study investigating the masticatory ability of elderly people reported that “objective masticatory ability” was related significantly to “tooth loss less than 10” and “subjective evaluation that I can chew all foods well” [6]. This study also demonstrated that the masticatory ability of elderly people could affect the physical activity and maintenance of the social contacts, which are both related to quality of life (QOL) [6].Although many studies indicated that maintaining more than 20 teeth provided a general health condition in elderly people, its relationship between oral health conditions and lifestyle except for smoking habit is still unclear.The aim of this study was to clarify the relationship between lifestyle and “maintaining more than 20 teeth,” and to compare with the “subjective masticatory ability” which is defined as the capacity to chew all foods well.


## 2. Materials and Methods

This study was performed on 5383 elderly people (male; 2347, female; 3036, 75–100 years old, mean age;80.2±4.3) who participated in “the survey for present teeth number and oral health of elderly people” in Kagawa Prefecture in 2009. The data regarding the number of remaining teeth, collected by dentists belonging to Kagawa Dental Association, and the questionnaire concerning lifestyle and self-perceived oral health conditions was analyzed statistically. Remaining tooth was defined as a functional tooth for mastication.The recategorized questionnaires are shown in Table1. A bivariate analysis using the chi-squared test was conducted to determine associations in the distribution between study variables and “remaining teeth more than 20” or “subjective masticatory ability.” Logistic regression analysis for “remaining teeth more than 20” or “subjective masticatory ability” as the outcome variable was utilized to enumerate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) relative to the reference group. All computations were conducted with SPSS 15.0 J software. The level of significance was considered as P<0.05. The Ethics Committee of Tokushima University Hospital approved this study (the number of the protocol approval: 1121).Table 1
Items of the recategorized questionnaires in this study.
Lifestyle
(1) Do you live a regular life rhythm? (Yes, No)
(2) Do you have a regular sleep? (Yes, No)
(3) Do you perform regular physical activity? (Yes, No)
(4) Do you have current tobacco habit? (No, Yes)
(5) Do you drink alcohol? (No, Yes)
Stress
(6) Do you feel stressed? (No, Yes)
Oral hygiene habit
(7) Do you observe your teeth and/or gum using a mirror? (Yes, No)
(8) Do you use an interdental brush and/or dental floss? (Yes, No)
(9) Do you spend enough time for tooth brushing? (Yes, No)
Subjective oral health symptom
(10) Have you choked? (No, Yes)
(11) Do you feel mouth dry? (No, Yes)
Eating behavior
(12) Do you have a deviated food habit? (No, Yes)
(13) How many times do you chew before swallowing? (more than 30 times, fewer than 30 times
Subjective masticatory ability
(14) Can you chew all foods well? (Yes, No)


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Relationship between “Remaining Teeth More Than 20” and “Subjective Masticatory Ability”

The chi-squared test demonstrated a significant relationship between “remaining teeth more than 20” and “subjective masticatory ability” (P<0.001) (Table 2). Twenty-nine percent of total subjects had “remaining teeth less than 20” but answered that “I can eat all food well.”Table 2
Distribution of numbers and percentages of subjects by “remaining teeth number” and “subjective masticatory ability.”
Can you eat all foods well?
Total
Yes
No
Remaining teeth
More than 20
1392 (25.9%)
502 (9.3%)
1894 (35.2%)
Less than 20
1581 (29.4%)
1908 (35.4%)
3489 (64.8%)
Total
2973 (55.3%)
2410 (44.7%)
5383 (100%)


### 3.2. Relationship between “Remaining Teeth More Than 20” and the Various Items of Questionnaires

Table3 shows the relationship between “remaining teeth more than 20” and study variables analyzed in males and females separately. A significant difference of “drinking alcohol” was observed in males, whereas it was not observed in females. No significant relationship was detected between “remaining teeth more than 20” and “regular life rhythm,” “regular sleep,” and “regular physical activity.” Only “no current smoking” was significantly related to “remaining teeth more than 20” (P<0.01).Table 3
Distribution of subjects who have “remaining teeth more than 20 teeth” by study variables (Chi-squared test).
Variable
Male(N=2347)
Female (N=3036)
N
*
%**
P
N
*
%**
P
Regular life rhythm
Yes
2174
35.1
%
0.922
2815
35.4
%
0.657
No
173
34.7
%
221
33.9
%
Regular sleep
Yes
1882
35.8
%
0.132
2228
35.3
%
0.979
No
465
32.0
%
808
35.3
%
Regular physical activity
Yes
1244
35.9
%
0.371
1400
36.4
%
0.264
No
1103
34.1
%
1636
34.4
%
Current smoking
No
2068
36.0
%
0.005
2958
35.6
%
<0.001
Yes
279
27.6
%
78
24.4
%
Drinking alcohol
No
1316
32.9
%
0.014
2608
35.1
%
0.521
Yes
1031
37.7
%
428
Feeling stress
No
441
32.4
%
0.204
490
30.8
%
0.023
Yes
1906
35.6
%
2546
36.2
%
Observation of teeth and/or gum
Yes
989
40.2
%
<0.001
1461
40.8
%
<0.001
No
1358
31.2
%
1575
30.2
%
Using interdental tools
Yes
864
45.9
%
<0.001
1284
48.6
%
<0.001
No
1483
28.7
%
1752
25.6
%
Enough time for tooth brushing
Yes
1029
40.1
%
<0.001
1334
40.0
%
<0.001
No
1318
31.0
%
1702
31.7
%
Being choked
No
1760
35.3
%
0.577
2280
36.0
%
0.161
Yes
587
34.1
%
756
33.2
%
Feeling mouth dry
No
1522
35.9
%
0.240
1776
36.5
%
0.091
Yes
825
33.5
%
1260
33.6
%
Deviated food habit
No
1888
36.4
%
0.005
2438
36.5
%
0.004
Yes
459
29.4
%
598
30.3
%
Chewing before swallowing
More than 30 times
456
37.7
%
0.178
584
35.6
%
0.862
Fewer than 30 times
1891
34.4
%
2452
35.2
%
*
N: total number of subjects corresponding to each answer.
*
*%: the percentage of subjects who have “more than 20 teeth” corresponding to each answer.On the other hand, a significant association was observed with oral hygiene habit and eating behavior such as “observing teeth and/or gum using mirror,” “using an interdental brush and/or dental floss,” “spending enough time for tooth brushing,” and “no deviated food habit” by the chi-squared test (P<0.01). Self-perceived oral health condition such as “not choked”, “no dry mouth,” and “chewing more than 30 times” was not related. The relation with “no feeling stress” was significant in females, but not significant in males.


### 3.3. Relationship between “Subjective Masticatory Ability” and the Various Items of Questionnaires

Table4 shows the relationship between “subjective masticatory ability” and study variables analyzed in males and females separately. It was found that “subjective masticatory ability” was related significantly to “regular life rhythm,” “regular sleep,” “regular physical activity,” and “no current smoking” (P<0.01). On the contrary, the association with “no drinking alcohol” was not significant neither in male nor female.Table 4
Distribution of subjects who can chew all foods well by study variables (Chi-squared test).
Variable
Male(N=2347)
Female (N=3036)
N
*
%**
P
N
*
%**
P
Regular life rhythm
Yes
2174
57.7
%
<0.001
2815
55.5
%
<0.001
No
173
42.8
%
221
37.1
%
Regular sleep
Yes
1882
59.8
%
<0.001
2228
57.8
%
<0.001
No
465
43.7
%
808
44.2
%
Regular physical activity
Yes
1244
62.2
%
<0.001
1400
62.0
%
<0.001
No
1103
50.2
%
1636
47.5
%
Current smoking
No
2068
57.6
%
0.007
2958
54.6
%
0.002
Yes
279
49.1
%
78
37.2
%
Drinking alcohol
No
1316
56.6
%
0.975
2608
54.7
%
0.177
Yes
1031
56.5
%
428
51.2
%
Feeling stress
No
441
67.1
%
<0.001
490
66.1
%
<0.001
Yes
1906
54.1
%
2546
51.9
%
Observation of teeth and/or gum
Yes
989
59.0
%
0.040
1461
57.8
%
<0.001
No
1358
54.8
%
1575
50.8
%
Using interdental tools
Yes
864
64.2
%
<0.001
1284
60.6
%
<0.001
No
1483
52.1
%
1752
49.5
%
Enough time for tooth brushing
Yes
1029
61.5
%
<0.001
1334
60.3
%
<0.001
No
1318
52.7
%
1702
49.4
%
Being choked
No
1760
60.3
%
<0.001
2280
58.2
%
<0.001
Yes
587
45.5
%
756
42.2
%
Feeling mouth dry
No
1522
60.3
%
<0.001
1776
60.5
%
<0.001
Yes
825
49.7
%
1260
45.2
%
Deviated food habit
No
1888
59.5
%
<0.001
2438
57.3
%
<0.001
Yes
459
44.7
%
598
41.5
%
Chewing before swallowing
More than 30 times
456
61.2
%
0.027
584
58.2
%
0.029
Fewer than 30 times
1891
55.5
%
2452
53.2
%
*
N: total number of subjects corresponding to each answer.
**%: the percentage of subjects who can chew all foods well corresponding to each answer.The chi-squared test showed a significant relation between “subjective masticatory ability” and all variables analyzed concerning “stress,” “oral hygiene habit,” “self-perceived oral health condition,” and “eating behavior.” These significant relations were demonstrated both in males and females.


### 3.4. Binominal Logistic Regression Analysis with “Remaining Teeth More Than 20” as the Dependent Variable Concerning “Lifestyle”

As shown in Table5, variables significantly associated with “remaining teeth more than 20” were “no current smoking” (OR = 1.582, 95%CI: 1.240–2.020) and “no drinking alcohol” (OR = 0.851, 95%CI: 0.749–0.966).Table 5
Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for “remaining teeth more than 20” by binominal logistic regression analysis* (n=5383).
Variable
Or
95% CI
P-value
Regular life rhythm
Yes
0.985
0.784–1.237
0.896
No (ref.)
Regular sleep
Yes
1.053
0.916–1.211
0.468
No (ref.)
Regular physical activity
Yes
1.064
0.950–1.191
0.287
No (ref.)
Current smoking
No
1.582
1.240–2.020
<0.001
Yes (ref.)
Drinking alcohol
No
0.851
0.749–0.966
0.013
Yes (ref.)
*Binominal logistic regression analysis was conducted using 5 variables concerning life-style as the dependent variable.
Results significant at the 5% level are indicated in bold.
ref.: reference category.


### 3.5. Binominal Logistic Regression Analysis with “Subjective Masticatory Ability” as the Dependent Variable Concerning “Lifestyle”

Odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of various variables are shown in Table6. Statistically significant associations were found between “subjective masticatory ability” and all variables concerning “lifestyle” except for “no drinking alcohol”.Table 6
Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for “subjective masticatory ability” by binominal logistic regression analysis* (n=5383).
Variable
OR
95% CI
P-value
Regular life rhythm
Yes
1.436
1.150–1.793
0.001
No (ref.)
Regular sleep
Yes
1.617
1.414–1.849
<0.001
No (ref.)
Regular physical activity
Yes
1.641
1.470–1.833
<0.001
No (ref.)
Current smoking
No
1.420
1.137–1.773
0.002
Yes (ref.)
Drinking alcohol
No
1.061
0.937–1.203
0.351
Yes (ref.)
*Binominal logistic regression analysis was conducted using 5 variables concerning life-style as the dependent variable.
Results significant at the 5% level are indicated in bold.
ref.: reference category.


## 3.1. Relationship between “Remaining Teeth More Than 20” and “Subjective Masticatory Ability”

The chi-squared test demonstrated a significant relationship between “remaining teeth more than 20” and “subjective masticatory ability” (P<0.001) (Table 2). Twenty-nine percent of total subjects had “remaining teeth less than 20” but answered that “I can eat all food well.”Table 2
Distribution of numbers and percentages of subjects by “remaining teeth number” and “subjective masticatory ability.”
Can you eat all foods well?
Total
Yes
No
Remaining teeth
More than 20
1392 (25.9%)
502 (9.3%)
1894 (35.2%)
Less than 20
1581 (29.4%)
1908 (35.4%)
3489 (64.8%)
Total
2973 (55.3%)
2410 (44.7%)
5383 (100%)


## 3.2. Relationship between “Remaining Teeth More Than 20” and the Various Items of Questionnaires

Table3 shows the relationship between “remaining teeth more than 20” and study variables analyzed in males and females separately. A significant difference of “drinking alcohol” was observed in males, whereas it was not observed in females. No significant relationship was detected between “remaining teeth more than 20” and “regular life rhythm,” “regular sleep,” and “regular physical activity.” Only “no current smoking” was significantly related to “remaining teeth more than 20” (P<0.01).Table 3
Distribution of subjects who have “remaining teeth more than 20 teeth” by study variables (Chi-squared test).
Variable
Male(N=2347)
Female (N=3036)
N
*
%**
P
N
*
%**
P
Regular life rhythm
Yes
2174
35.1
%
0.922
2815
35.4
%
0.657
No
173
34.7
%
221
33.9
%
Regular sleep
Yes
1882
35.8
%
0.132
2228
35.3
%
0.979
No
465
32.0
%
808
35.3
%
Regular physical activity
Yes
1244
35.9
%
0.371
1400
36.4
%
0.264
No
1103
34.1
%
1636
34.4
%
Current smoking
No
2068
36.0
%
0.005
2958
35.6
%
<0.001
Yes
279
27.6
%
78
24.4
%
Drinking alcohol
No
1316
32.9
%
0.014
2608
35.1
%
0.521
Yes
1031
37.7
%
428
Feeling stress
No
441
32.4
%
0.204
490
30.8
%
0.023
Yes
1906
35.6
%
2546
36.2
%
Observation of teeth and/or gum
Yes
989
40.2
%
<0.001
1461
40.8
%
<0.001
No
1358
31.2
%
1575
30.2
%
Using interdental tools
Yes
864
45.9
%
<0.001
1284
48.6
%
<0.001
No
1483
28.7
%
1752
25.6
%
Enough time for tooth brushing
Yes
1029
40.1
%
<0.001
1334
40.0
%
<0.001
No
1318
31.0
%
1702
31.7
%
Being choked
No
1760
35.3
%
0.577
2280
36.0
%
0.161
Yes
587
34.1
%
756
33.2
%
Feeling mouth dry
No
1522
35.9
%
0.240
1776
36.5
%
0.091
Yes
825
33.5
%
1260
33.6
%
Deviated food habit
No
1888
36.4
%
0.005
2438
36.5
%
0.004
Yes
459
29.4
%
598
30.3
%
Chewing before swallowing
More than 30 times
456
37.7
%
0.178
584
35.6
%
0.862
Fewer than 30 times
1891
34.4
%
2452
35.2
%
*
N: total number of subjects corresponding to each answer.
*
*%: the percentage of subjects who have “more than 20 teeth” corresponding to each answer.On the other hand, a significant association was observed with oral hygiene habit and eating behavior such as “observing teeth and/or gum using mirror,” “using an interdental brush and/or dental floss,” “spending enough time for tooth brushing,” and “no deviated food habit” by the chi-squared test (P<0.01). Self-perceived oral health condition such as “not choked”, “no dry mouth,” and “chewing more than 30 times” was not related. The relation with “no feeling stress” was significant in females, but not significant in males.


## 3.3. Relationship between “Subjective Masticatory Ability” and the Various Items of Questionnaires

Table4 shows the relationship between “subjective masticatory ability” and study variables analyzed in males and females separately. It was found that “subjective masticatory ability” was related significantly to “regular life rhythm,” “regular sleep,” “regular physical activity,” and “no current smoking” (P<0.01). On the contrary, the association with “no drinking alcohol” was not significant neither in male nor female.Table 4
Distribution of subjects who can chew all foods well by study variables (Chi-squared test).
Variable
Male(N=2347)
Female (N=3036)
N
*
%**
P
N
*
%**
P
Regular life rhythm
Yes
2174
57.7
%
<0.001
2815
55.5
%
<0.001
No
173
42.8
%
221
37.1
%
Regular sleep
Yes
1882
59.8
%
<0.001
2228
57.8
%
<0.001
No
465
43.7
%
808
44.2
%
Regular physical activity
Yes
1244
62.2
%
<0.001
1400
62.0
%
<0.001
No
1103
50.2
%
1636
47.5
%
Current smoking
No
2068
57.6
%
0.007
2958
54.6
%
0.002
Yes
279
49.1
%
78
37.2
%
Drinking alcohol
No
1316
56.6
%
0.975
2608
54.7
%
0.177
Yes
1031
56.5
%
428
51.2
%
Feeling stress
No
441
67.1
%
<0.001
490
66.1
%
<0.001
Yes
1906
54.1
%
2546
51.9
%
Observation of teeth and/or gum
Yes
989
59.0
%
0.040
1461
57.8
%
<0.001
No
1358
54.8
%
1575
50.8
%
Using interdental tools
Yes
864
64.2
%
<0.001
1284
60.6
%
<0.001
No
1483
52.1
%
1752
49.5
%
Enough time for tooth brushing
Yes
1029
61.5
%
<0.001
1334
60.3
%
<0.001
No
1318
52.7
%
1702
49.4
%
Being choked
No
1760
60.3
%
<0.001
2280
58.2
%
<0.001
Yes
587
45.5
%
756
42.2
%
Feeling mouth dry
No
1522
60.3
%
<0.001
1776
60.5
%
<0.001
Yes
825
49.7
%
1260
45.2
%
Deviated food habit
No
1888
59.5
%
<0.001
2438
57.3
%
<0.001
Yes
459
44.7
%
598
41.5
%
Chewing before swallowing
More than 30 times
456
61.2
%
0.027
584
58.2
%
0.029
Fewer than 30 times
1891
55.5
%
2452
53.2
%
*
N: total number of subjects corresponding to each answer.
**%: the percentage of subjects who can chew all foods well corresponding to each answer.The chi-squared test showed a significant relation between “subjective masticatory ability” and all variables analyzed concerning “stress,” “oral hygiene habit,” “self-perceived oral health condition,” and “eating behavior.” These significant relations were demonstrated both in males and females.


## 3.4. Binominal Logistic Regression Analysis with “Remaining Teeth More Than 20” as the Dependent Variable Concerning “Lifestyle”

As shown in Table5, variables significantly associated with “remaining teeth more than 20” were “no current smoking” (OR = 1.582, 95%CI: 1.240–2.020) and “no drinking alcohol” (OR = 0.851, 95%CI: 0.749–0.966).Table 5
Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for “remaining teeth more than 20” by binominal logistic regression analysis* (n=5383).
Variable
Or
95% CI
P-value
Regular life rhythm
Yes
0.985
0.784–1.237
0.896
No (ref.)
Regular sleep
Yes
1.053
0.916–1.211
0.468
No (ref.)
Regular physical activity
Yes
1.064
0.950–1.191
0.287
No (ref.)
Current smoking
No
1.582
1.240–2.020
<0.001
Yes (ref.)
Drinking alcohol
No
0.851
0.749–0.966
0.013
Yes (ref.)
*Binominal logistic regression analysis was conducted using 5 variables concerning life-style as the dependent variable.
Results significant at the 5% level are indicated in bold.
ref.: reference category.


## 3.5. Binominal Logistic Regression Analysis with “Subjective Masticatory Ability” as the Dependent Variable Concerning “Lifestyle”

Odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of various variables are shown in Table6. Statistically significant associations were found between “subjective masticatory ability” and all variables concerning “lifestyle” except for “no drinking alcohol”.Table 6
Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for “subjective masticatory ability” by binominal logistic regression analysis* (n=5383).
Variable
OR
95% CI
P-value
Regular life rhythm
Yes
1.436
1.150–1.793
0.001
No (ref.)
Regular sleep
Yes
1.617
1.414–1.849
<0.001
No (ref.)
Regular physical activity
Yes
1.641
1.470–1.833
<0.001
No (ref.)
Current smoking
No
1.420
1.137–1.773
0.002
Yes (ref.)
Drinking alcohol
No
1.061
0.937–1.203
0.351
Yes (ref.)
*Binominal logistic regression analysis was conducted using 5 variables concerning life-style as the dependent variable.
Results significant at the 5% level are indicated in bold.
ref.: reference category.


## 4. Discussion

The National Health Promotion Movement in the 21st Century (Healthy Japan 21) [7] identified lifestyle-related diseases as targets and provided goals for these targets, aiming their implementation by 2010. These activities are intended to cover nine specific areas including dental health. Result from this study revealed that “subjective masticatory ability” was clearly related to “favorable lifestyle” such as “regular life rhythm,” “regular sleep,” and “regular physical activity” in contrast with “remaining teeth more than 20.” We found that the persons who can chew all foods well with less than 20 present teeth represented 29.4% of all subjects. Actually, it was more than the person who can chew all foods well with more than 20 present teeth (1392 persons versus 1581 persons). In fact, “8020 Movement” originated from the consensus that they can chew all foods well if they have more than 20 teeth. Data from this study might suggest that the goal which we should aim at is “maintaining to chew all foods well” in addition to “maintaining teeth more than 20.”In this study, we found that “subjective masticatory ability” was significantly related to “self-perceived good oral conditions” (i.e., “chewing more than 30 times before swallowing,” “not choked,” “no dry mouth”). In addition, a significant relationship with “no deviated food habit” was also found. It might be speculated that the ability to chew all foods well leads to balanced food intake, stimulation of saliva secretion followed by safety swallowing. In other words, enough masticatory ability might provide to elderly people some advantages for maintaining oral functions, balanced nutrition, and food intake, maintaining physical power and activity, preventing a stress derived from trouble when eating, and at last, improving quality of life.The binominal logistic regression analysis with “remaining teeth more than 20” showed that “no drinking alcohol” was a significant negative factor. These findings are consistent with previous reports [8, 9]. Hanioka et al. demonstrated that “drinking alcohol” was negatively associated with “total tooth loss” in elderly women in Japan [8]. Nakayama and Mori reported a significant relationship between “remaining teeth fewer than 20” and “drinking alcohol” in elderly men [9] in Japan. On the other hand, it is also reported that “heavy drinking” was associated with tooth loss [10]. In this study, we could not distinguish the amount and/or intake frequency of alcohol. Since many “light drinker” might be categorized as “drinker” in this study, we cannot conclude that “no drinking alcohol” is favorable lifestyle.Since this study was a cross-sectional investigation, we cannot conclude causality of each variable analyzed. It was confirmed that “current smoking” affected strongly the present teeth number, as previously reported. We must emphasize more to reduce tobacco use towards young smoker for maintaining teeth in future and for enjoying meal time without any trouble at old age.In conclusion, it is suggested that subjective masticatory ability is associated with daily life habits. Therefore, general health care should be considered by those responsible for oral management to support the QOL of elderly people.


## 5. Conclusions

Our results suggest that subjective masticatory ability which enables to chew all foods well was significantly related to favorable oral health conditions. Besides, “subjective masticatory ability” was associated with daily living habit such as regular sleep and regular physical activity, while “remaining teeth more than 20” was not. It is suggested that “subjective masticatory ability” might be a good landmark for QOL of elderly people in addition to the number of remaining teeth.



---

*Source: 687139-2013-05-13.xml*