# Ichthyofaunal Diversity and Water Quality in the Kangsabati Reservoir, West Bengal, India

Authors: Amalesh Bera; Manojit Bhattacharya; Bidhan Chandra Patra; Utpal Kumar Sar
Journal: Advances in Zoology
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

The ichthyofauna  in relation to water quality was studied on monthly basis from March, 2010 to February, 2011 in the Kangsabati Reservoir, West Bengal. The study revealed that physicochemical parameters of Kangsabati Reservoir were congenial for 39 fish species of commercial importance, belonging to 7 orders, 15 families, and 26 genera. The  Cypriniformes were dominant with 17 species, followed by  Siluriformes and Perciformes, with 7 species each, Channiformes with 3 species, Osteoglossiformes and Synbranchiformes with 2 species each, and Anguilliformes  with 1 species.  Regarding their conservation status, 27 species were of least concern, 1 species was vulnerable, 6 species were near threatened, 1 species was data deficient, and 4 species were not evaluated  (IUCN-Version 2014.1). Economical values have also been evaluated. Water parameters such as temperature, pH, alkalinity, dissolved oxygen, hardness, free CO2, salinity, total inorganic nitrogen, and phosphate were recorded and found suitable for fish production. Conductivity, transparency, and high chloride level are minor limiting factor that may needs rectification for improved fisheries management.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The aquatic ecosystem is highly dependent on water quality and biological diversity. Physicochemical parameters of water play a significant role in the biology and physiology of fish [1]. Lakes and reservoirs contribute to the single largest inland fishery resources in terms of both size and production potential. Fishes are the important indicator of aquatic ecosystem and occupy a remarkable position from a socioeconomic point of view. Fish is very rich source of protein as well as vitamins and other minerals. Kangsabati Reservoir is situated between 22°55′16.53′′N–23°2′30.41′′N latitude and 86°37′55.30′′E–86°47′23.35′′E longitude, about 67 Km southwest from the Bankura District Town, West Bengal, India. The reservoir is used not only for irrigation but also for fish production by Fishery Department, Government of West Bengal, through the involvement of local fishermen communities. The structure of fish community, fish distribution, and ichthyofauna diversity has been reported by various workers in the different lakes and reservoirs [2–19]. But comprehensive information of Kangsabati Reservoir (Figure 1) on fish diversity in relation to water quality is inadequate to frame a tangible fisheries programme.Figure 1
View of the Kangsabati Reservoir (blue shaded area indicating reservoir area in inset).In the present study, our main aim was to evaluate the suitability of water to nurture fishery activity, by recording water parameters. We describe the fish diversity in Kangsabati reservoir, in connection with the physicochemical parameters of water, in order to formulate future planning for the development of the socioeconomic status of fishermen.


## 2. Materials and Methods

The study was conducted every last week of each month, between 6.00 and 8.00 a.m. The fish samples were captured with the help of local skilled fishermen in three preselected sampling sites. Dragnet, Castanet, Scoop net, Basket trap, and so forth were used for capturing fish. Fish species available at the local market and caught by local fishermen from the reservoir were also purchased. All fish species were preserved in 10% formaldehyde solution for identification to genus and species level using taxonomic keys and standard literatures [20–23].Samples of subsurface water were collected monthly in clean plastic air tight bottles at three stations (local names: Sadarghat, Aparajitaghat, and Peerlessghat) from March 2010 to February 2011, from 8 to 9.30 a.m. The water and air temperature were recorded by hydrothermometer and minimum-maximum thermometer, respectively; pH recorded by digital pH meter (Cystronics model 335); conductivity analyzed by conductivity meter (Labtronics model LT 16); dissolved oxygen examined by Winkler’s method; photic depth measured by Secchi disc method; free Co2, alkalinity, chlorinity, phosphorus, total inorganic nitrogen, calcium, magnesium and hardness were calculated as standard laboratory protocol [24]. The diversity was calculated on number of species, while the orders were used to calculate the Shannon-Wiener index.


## 3. Results

The value of water parameters is depicted in Table1, and the data on the fish community of the Kangsabati Reservoir are presented in Tables 2, 3, and 4. The periodical survey of the ichthyofauna revealed the occurrence of 39 species belonging to 15 families, 26 genera, and 7 orders. On the basis of species composition, Cypriniformes were dominant (17 species) followed by Siluriformes and Perciformes (each of 7 species), Channiformes (3 species), Osteoglossiformes and Synbranchiformes (each of 2 species), and Anguilliformes (1 species).Table 1
Seasonal variation of physicochemical parameters of the water in Kangsabati Reservoir, March 2010–February 2011.
Parameters(units)
Summer season   (March–June)
Rainy season (July–October)
Winter season   (November–February)
Air temperature (°C)
33.58–36.83
31.06–35.83
25.0–35.25
Water temperature (°C)
28.16–31.50
28.80–31.66
18.33–27.83
Transparency (cm)
40.83–181.66
133.0–193.6
188.1–308.5
Conductivity (µmho/cm)
15.73–17.11
12.14–16.43
11.95–14.47
pH
7.32–7.72
7.38–7.98
7.42–8.45
D.O. (mg/L)
7.20–9.00
7.60–11.60
10.40–12.00
Alkalinity (mg/L)
54.33–94.00
40.67–79.66
60.33–80.34
Chloride (mg/L)
132.91–305.3
127.4–160.93
110.9–160.40
Phosphate (mg/L)
0.014–0.041
0.098–0.199
0.037–0.062
Total inorganic nitrogen (mg/L)
0.50–1.08
1.06–1.96
0.74–1.02
Hardness (ppm)
115.18–178.6
137.00–195.36
112.60–170.60
Salinity (ppt)
0.26–0.57
0.25–0.31
0.22–0.31
Photic depth (cm)
32.66–170.00
117.00–176.60
163.00–287.00
Free CO2  (ppm)
3.66–4.00
3.33–7.00
3.66–9.66
Water level (ft)
396.00–399.00
405.00–432.80
409.20–415.80
Rainfall (average in mm)
4.30–138.20
90.80–213.60
0.00–34.80
Plankton population
Plankton density (ind/L)
1362–2183
965–1681
1253–2240Table 2
Fish species  in Kangsabati Reservoir  from March 2010 to February 2011 [27–30].
Sl.number
Order
Family
Scientific name
Common name
Local name
Iucn status
Seasonal abundance
Economic value
1
Cypriniformes
Cyprinidae
Labeo rohita (Ham.)
Rohu
Rui
LC
TY
Food fish
2
Labeo calbasu (Ham.)
Black rohu/karnataka labeo
Kalbose
LC
TY
Food fish
3
Labeo bata (Ham.)
Bata labeo/minor carp
Bata
LC
SM
Food fish
4
Puntius ticto (Ham.)
Ticto barb
Tit punti
LC
SM
Ornamental, food fish
5
Puntius sophore (Ham.)
Pool barb
Jatpunti
LC
SM
Ornamental
6
Puntius gelius (Ham.)
Golden dwarf barb
Dor punti
LC
SM
Ornamental
7
Catla catla (Ham.)
Catla
Catla
LC
TY
Food fish
8
Amblypharyngodon mola (Ham.)
Mola carplet
Mourala
LC
SM
Ornamental
9
Amblypharyngodon microlepis (Bleeker)
Indian carplet
Mourala
LC
SM
Ornamental
10
Rasbora daniconius (Ham.)
Slender rasbora
Siram punti
LC
TY
Ornamental
11
Cirrhinus mrigala (Ham.)
Mrigal
Mrigal/Mrig
LC
RS
Food fish
12
Cirrhinus reba (Ham.)
Reba carp
Bhangonbata
LC
SM
Food fish
13
Cyprinus carpio (Linn.)
Wild common carp
Cyprinus
VU
TY
Ornamental/food fish
14
Esomus danricus (Ham.)
Flying barb
Darkya
LC
TY
Ornamental
15
Salmostoma bacaila (Ham.)
Large razorbelly minnow
Chela
LC
SM
Food fish/ornamental
16
Hypophthalmichthys molitrix (Val.)
Silver carp
Silver carp
NT
TY
Food fish
17
Ctenopharyngodon idella (Val.)
Grass carp
Grass carp
NE
TY
Food fish
18
Perciformes
Ambassidae
Chanda ranga (Ham.)
Indian glassy fish
Ranjanchanda
LC
WN
Ornamental
19
Chanda nama (Ham.)
Elongate glass-perchlet
Kanta chanda
LC
TY
Ornamental
20
Cichlidae
Oreochromis niloticus (Linn.)
Nile tilapia
Nilontica
NE
TY
Food fish
21
Oreochromis mossambicus (Peters)
Mozambique tilapia
Tilapia
NT
TY
Food fish
22
Osphronemidae
Trichogaster lalius (Ham.)
Dwarf gourami
Khoira
LC
SM
Ornamental
23
Anabantidae
Anabas testudineus (Bloch)
Climbing perch
Koi
DD
TY/RS
Ornamental
24
Gobiidae
Glossogobius giuris (Ham.)
Bareye goby
Bele
LC
WN
Ornamental/food fish
25
Siluriformes
Siluridae
Ompok pabda (Ham.)
Pabdah catfish
Pabda
NT
SM
Food fish
26
Wallago attu (Bl. & Schn.)
Fresh water shark
Boal
NT
WN
Food fish/ornamental
27
Claridae
Clarias batrachus (Linn.)
Air breathing catfish
Magur
LC
WN
Ornamental/food fish
28
Heteropneustidae
Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch)
Stinging catfish
Singhi
LC
SM
Ornamental/food fish
29
Bagridae
Mystus vittatus (Bloch)
Striped dwart catfish
Tangra
LC
WN
Ornamental/food fish
30
Mystus tengara (Ham.)
Tengara catfish
Tangra
LC
WN
Food fish/ornamental
31
Schilbeidae
Eutropiichthys vacha (Ham.)
Bacha
Bacha
LC
WN
Food fish
32
Synbranchiformes
Mastacembelidae
Macrognathus pancalus  (Ham.)
Barred spiny eel
Pacal
LC
WN
Food fish
33
Macrognathus aculeatus (Bloch)
Lesser spiny eel
Pacal
NE
WN
Ornamental/food fish
34
Channiformes
Channidae
Channa punctata (Bloch)
Spotted snakehead
Lata
LC
SM
Food fish/ornamental
35
Channa striata (Bloch)
Stripped or Snakehead murrel
Shol
LC
SM
Food fish/ornamental
36
Channa orientalis (Bl. & Schn.)
Walking snakehead
Cheng
NE
SM
Food fish
37
Osteoglossiformes
Notopteridae
Notopterus notopterus (Pallas)
Bronze featherback
Folui
LC
WN
Ornamental/food fish
38
Notopterus chitala/Chitala chitala (Ham.)
Humped featherback
Chital
NT
WN
Ornamental/food fish
39
Anguilliformes
Anguillidae
Anguilla bengalensis (Gray)
Indian mottled eel
Ban fish
NT
RS
Ornamental
LC = least concern, VU = vulnerable, NT = near threatened, NE = not evaluated, DD = data deficient; WN = winter,
SM = summer, TY = throughout the year, and RS = rainy season.Table 3
Composition of the fish community by order.
Sl.number
Taxa
Number of species
Percentage (%)
1
Order: Cypriniformes
17
43.58
2
Order: Perciformes
7
17.95
3
Order: Siluriformes
7
17.95
4
Order: Channiformes
3
7.69
5
Order: Osteoglossiformes
2
5.13
6
Order: Synbranchiformes
2
5.13
7
Order: Anguilliformes
1
2.57
Total
39Table 4
Composition of the fish community by  family.
Sl.number
Taxa/families
Number of Species
Percentage (%)
1
Family: Cyprinidae
17
43.58
2
Family: Ambassidae
2
5..12
3
Family: Cichlidae
2
5.12
4
Family: Osphronemidae
1
2.57
5
Family: Anabantidae
1
2.57
6
Family: Gobiidae
1
2.57
7
Family: Siluridae
2
5.13
8
Family: Claridae
1
2.57
9
Family: Heteropneustidae
1
2.57
10
Family: Bagridae
2
5.13
11
Family: Schilbeidae
1
2.57
12
Family: Channidae
3
7.69
13
Family: Notopteridae
2
5.12
14
Family: Mastacembelidae
2
5.12
15
Family: Anguillidae
1
2.57
Total
39


## 4. Discussion

Among the studies on ichthyofaunal diversity previously conducted for our region in large aquatic bodies like the Kangsabati Reservoir, [25] reported the occurrence of 26 fish species belonging to 5 orders, 7 families, and 15 genera in Godavari river at Mudgal. The order Cypriniformes was dominant with 15 species, followed by Siluriformes with 5 species, Channiformes with 4 species, and Mastacembeliformes and Perciformes with 1 species each. Similar results, a total of 29 fish species belonging to 10 families, 7 orders, and 15 genera were reported for the Halali Reservoir, Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh [26].The aquatic habitat and water quality parameters affect the fish growth and development and ichthyofaunal diversity. Temperature is the important factor for the aquatic biota. According to FAO report [31], the increase of temperature directly or indirectly impacts species distribution and the seasonality of production in fishes. According to the guidelines for water quality management for fish culture in Tripura, the suitable water temperature for carp culture ranges between 24°C and 30°C. So, the water temperature of Kangsabati Reservoir was very suitable, except a minute fall during the winter season.Transparency helps to assess the quality of water. According to [32] a turbidity ranging from 30 to 80 cm is good for fish health. On the other hand, according to guidelines for water quality management for fish culture in Tripura [33], transparency between 30 and 40 cm indicates optimum productivity of a pond for good fish culture. High transparency value means that enough light penetrates and encourages macrophytes growth, so that less plankton is available as food for fish. Water transparency in the Kangsabati Reservoir was not completely satisfactory.Electrical conductivity, comprising the total dissolved ions, is a good indicator of water chemistry. A certain level of ions in water is essential as nutrients for aquatic life [34]. According to the report of Southern Regional Aquaculture Centre (SRAC) [35], the desirable range of conductivity for fish culture is 60–2000 μmho/cm. Our results showed values that were lower than the optimal limit. SRAC also reported that fresh water fish generally thrive over a wide range of electrical conductivity and that the upper range of tolerance varies with fish species.pH is another important parameter for fish culture. According to the report of Northeastern Regional Aquaculture Centre (NRAC) [36], fish survive and grow best in waters with a pH between 6 and 9. The pH values we recorded in the Kangsabati Reservoir remained within such safe range.Reference [37] experimentally proved that dissolved oxygen is one of the most important parameters and a primary limiting factor controlling fish growth and survival. According to [38], D.O. should be above 5.0 mg/L for average or good production. Besides, [39] also reported that D.O. level > 5.0 mg/L is essential to support good fish production. The D.O. content in Kangsabati Reservoir was very satisfactory for fish culture.Alkalinity of water is a measure of its capacity to neutralize acids. According to the guidelines for water quality management for fish culture in Tripura, the ideal value of alkalinity for fish culture is 50–300 mg/L. According to the report of SRAC, the desirable limit for fish culture is 50 to 150 mg/L, and the acceptable range is from 20 to 400 mg/L. So, the alkalinity range of Kangsabati Reservoir permits the fisheries activity.According to SRAC, more than 100 mg/L is the desirable range for commercial catfish production. So, the chloride value of the Kangsabati Reservoir was very high and stressful for fish culture. Higher chloride content may be due to contamination through large quantity of sewage input [26]. Higher concentration of chloride in water is an indicator of eutrophy [40]. The higher concentration of chloride in the Kangsabati Reservoir may be due to agricultural and sewage run-off during rain from the surrounding area of the reservoir and higher evaporation rate.In most fresh waters, total hardness is mainly due to calcium and magnesium ions. According to the guidelines for water quality management for fish culture in Tripura, the ideal value of hardness for fish culture is 30–180 mg/L. Reference [32] opined that 75–150 mg/L is optimum for fish culture. The hardness in Kangsabati Reservoir was slightly outside the desirable limits but did not reach harmful values. Some euryhaline species may have high tolerance limits to hardness [41].Carbon di oxide is produced in water as a result of respiration of the aquatic organisms. According to the report of NRAC, the preferred range of free CO2 ≤ 10 mg/L. Besides, the guidelines for water quality management for fish culture in Tripura also mentioned that water supporting abundant fish populations should contain ≤ 5 mg/L free carbon dioxide. Reference [41] clearly indicated an acceptable range of 0–10 mg/L and a desirable range of <5, 5–8 mg/L of free CO2 for high fish yield. The CO2 values we recorded for the Kangsabati Reservoir can strongly support fish culture.Salinity limits may vary from species to species of fish [41]. According to the report of NRAC, the preferred ranges for fresh water fish culture are <0.5–1.0 ppt. Our results fall within the limits given by NRAC.Phosphorus is very critical in maintaining aquatic productivity. SRAC recommend desirable phosphate level for fish culture of 0.06 mg/L, and the typical range for surface water is 0.005–0.5 mg/L. Reference [41] reported an optimum range for phosphorus of 0.01–3.0 mg/L. The value of phosphate in Kangsabati Reservoir matched the ranges given above. Reference [38] reported 0.05–0.20 ppm range for medium to high productivity in fish ponds.Nitrogen element is a vital component of protein and is essential for fish growth. FAO recommends desirable limit of total dissolved nitrogen for fish culture of 0.2 ppm. On the other hand, [38] reported TDN values of 0.2–0.5 ppm as favourable for good productivity in ponds. Other than during the rainy season, the total level of inorganic or dissolved nitrogen in the Kangsabati Reservoir is acceptable for fish culture and does not hamper the fish production.Throughout the year, water level in the Kangsabati Reservoir falls from April to June but still remains in adequate amount for fish cultivation.Plankton is the chief food source for fish. According to [41], the desirable range of plankton density is 3000–4500 individual/L, and acceptable values are ≥2000 individual/L. Both the zooplankton and the phytoplankton density together enhance the fisheries programme in our reservoir.Therefore, each water quality parameter in the Kangsabati Reservoir remain within the limits suitable for fish production [33, 35, 36, 38, 41]. Most of the local workers reported that D.O., pH, alkalinity, temperature, and hardness are the main factors which showed satisfactory results for fish culture in Kangsabati Reservoir. Salinity, phosphate, and free Co2, with the only exception of transparency and chloride level, also are favourable for good fish production. Conductivity was slightly variable throughout the study period and not completely favourable for pisciculture. A slight increase in planktonic density, as fish food, would be advisable. The end of the rainy season and the whole winter are the best and the healthier periods for fish growth.We conclude that water quality in the Kangsabati Reservoir favours for fish cultivation and allows for a high ichthyofaunal diversity, with a value of 1.71 as per Shannon-Wiener index. We recommend the adoption of scientific fishery management, in order to regulate transparency and chloride level.



---

*Source: 674313-2014-12-31.xml*