# Development of Tyrosine-Based RadiotracerTc99m-N4-Tyrosine for Breast Cancer Imaging

Authors: Fan-Lin Kong; Mohammad S. Ali; Alex Rollo; Daniel L. Smith; Yinhan Zhang; Dong-Fang Yu; David J. Yang
Journal: Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop an efficient way to synthesizeTc99m-O-[3-(1,4,8,11-tetraazabicyclohexadecane)-propyl]-tyrosine (Tc99m-N4-Tyrosine), a novel amino acid-based radiotracer, and evaluate its potential in breast cancer gamma imaging. Precursor N4-Tyrosine was synthesized using a 5-step procedure, and its total synthesis yield was 38%. It was successfully labeled with Tc99m with high radiochemical purity (>95%). Cellular uptake of Tc99m-N4-Tyrosine was much higher than that of Tc99m-N4 and the clinical gold standard 18F-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-glucose (18F-FDG) in rat breast tumor cells in vitro. Tissue uptake and dosimetry estimation in normal rats revealed that Tc99m-N4-Tyrosine could be safely administered to humans. Evaluation in breast tumor-bearing rats showed that although Tc99m-N4-Tyrosine appeared to be inferior to 18F-FDG in distinguishing breast tumor tissue from chemical-induced inflammatory tissue, it had high tumor-to-muscle uptake ratios and could detect breast tumors clearly by planar scintigraphic imaging. Tc99m-N4-Tyrosine could thus be a useful radiotracer for use in breast tumor diagnostic imaging.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

18F-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-glucose(18F-FDG), an 18F-labeled glucose analog, is a gold standard for positron emission tomography (PET) in cancer diagnosis. However, 18F-FDG-PET has several limitations that can result in false positive or negative diagnoses, and its ability to predict tumor response to chemotherapy or radionuclide therapy is poor [1]. For instance, 18F-FDG cannot distinguish tumor tissue from inflammatory or normal brain tissues because each type of tissue has high glucose consumption. Therefore, radiolabeled amino acids have been developed as an alternative to 18F-FDG in diagnostic imaging of cancer. Their use in tumor detection is based on an increased uptake of amino acids in tumor cells, which is assumed to reflect enhanced amino acid transport, metabolism, and protein synthesis [2].Among all radiolabeled amino acids, aromatic ones such as tyrosine and its derivatives are more suitable for use in cancer diagnostic imaging given their readily alterable chemistry and favorable biological characteristics. To date, tyrosine and itsα-methyl-substituted analog α-methyl tyrosine (AMT) have been successfully labeled with 11C, 18F, and 124/125I for PET imaging, as well as 123/131I for single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging, respectively [2–7]. Most of these radiolabeled tyrosine analogs show promise in preclinical and clinical research in diagnostic tumor imaging, especially for brain tumors. They have also been successfully applied to imaging breast cancer, which is the most common malignancy among women in the world. For instance, 11C-labeled tyrosine appears to be better than 18F-FDG for breast cancer imaging because of its lower uptake in noncancerous fibrocystic disease [8].However, most existing radiolabeled tyrosine derivatives require an on-site cyclotron to produce the radioisotope, which is inconvenient and costly. In addition to that, the radioisotopes have either a too short (e.g., 20 minutes for11C) or too long (e.g., 57.4 days for 125I) half-life, making them impractical for clinical use. Furthermore, iodine-labeled compounds are not stable in vivo because of deiodination. So far, 18F has the most appropriate half-life (110 minutes); however, the radiosynthesis yield of 18F-labeled radiotracers is relatively low, apparently because of the electrophilic fluorination and tedious purification of 18F. Therefore, a radiotracer with simpler chemistry and an affordable isotope that can be used clinically in most major medical facilities is needed.Technetium-99 m (99mTc) is an ideal radioisotope for diagnostic imaging studies because of its favorable physical characteristics. It emits a 140 keV gamma ray in 89% abundance, which is commonly used in gamma and SPECT imaging. The half-life of 99mTc is 6.02 hours, allowing serial images and, thus, overcoming a drawback of 18F [9]. Unlike most cyclotron-produced radionuclides, which use covalent chemistry for labeling, 99mTc requires a chelator to conjugate the radioisotope with the target ligand. The combinations of nitrogen, oxygen, and sulfur appear to be stable chelators for 99mTc [10–12]. In fact, this chelator could allow the same target ligand to be labeled with several different radioisotopes, such as gallium-68, indium-111, or rhenium-188, for future diagnostic and therapeutic applications.Here, we report the synthesis of99mTc-labeled tyrosine using 1,4,8,11-tetra-azacyclotetradecane (N4) cyclam as a chelator and evaluate its potential in gamma imaging using in vitro and in vivo breast tumor models.


## 2. Materials and Methods

All chemicals of analytical grade and solvents of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) was performed on a Bruker 300-MHz spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA), and mass spectra were performed on a Waters Q-TOF Ultima mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) at the chemistry core facility at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA). Sodium pertechnetate (Na99mTcO4) was obtained from a 99Mo/99mTc generator (Mallinckrodt, Hazelwood, MO, USA). 18F-FDG was obtained from the Department of Nuclear Medicine at MD Anderson.


### 2.1. Synthesis of Precursor N4-Tyrosine

#### 2.1.1. N-t-Butoxycarbonyl-O-[3-Br-propyl]-L-tyrosine Methyl Ester (Compound 1)

N-t-Butoxycarbonyl-L-tyrosine methyl ester (25.00 g; 0.085 mol) was dissolved in acetone (300 mL). 1,3-Dibromopropane (17.3 mL; 0.169 mol) and K2CO3 (58.00 g; 0.420 mol) were added under a nitrogen atmosphere. The reaction mixture was refluxed at 80°C overnight. After the mixture was cooled and filtered, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was dissolved in chloroform. The residue was washed with water and dried with anhydrous MgSO4. The product was purified by column chromatography using a silica gel column eluted with hexane: ethyl acetate (2 : 1, v/v). Yield: 33.30 g (94.60%). Ms (m/z) = 440.09 [M+Na]+.


#### 2.1.2. N1,N4-Dioxylyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazabicyclotetradecane (N1,N4-Cyclooxamide) (Compound 2)

N4 cyclam (15.00 g; 74.88 mmol) was dissolved in 150 mL of anhydrous ethanol, and diethyl oxalate (10.94 g; 74.88 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 18 hours at 75°C. The solvent was rotary evaporated, and the crude product was dissolved in minimum quantity of ethanol and filtered and recrystallized in 400 mL of acetone/ethanol to yield white crystals of compound 2. Yield: 13.64 g (71.62%). Ms (m/z) 255.19 [M]+.


#### 2.1.3. N-t-Butoxycarbonyl-O-[3-(N1,N4-dioxylyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazabicyclotetradecane)-propyl]-tyrosine Methyl Ester(Compound 3)

Compound 2 (0.63 g; 2.46 mmol) was dissolved in 20 mL of anhydrous dimethylformamide; it was reacted with a solution of compound 1 (1.06 g; 2.46 mmol) in 40 mL of dimethylformamide under a nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture was refluxed at 75°C for 18 hours and then cooled to room temperature. The reaction mixture was filtered, and the solvent was removedin vacuo. The crude compound was purified via silica gel column using chloroform: methanol solution (9 : 1, v/v). Yield: 0.65 g (1.05 mmol; 42.76%). Ms (m/z) 591.31 [M]+.


#### 2.1.4. O-[3-(N1,N4-Dioxylyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazabicyclotetradecane)-propyl]-tyrosine Methyl Ester (Compound 4)

To deprotect N-t-butoxycarbonyl group, Compound 3 (0.60 g; 1.00 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous dichloromethane (15 mL), and 2.5 mL of trifluoroacetic acid was added to it. The solution was stirred overnight at room temperature, and the solvents were then removed in vacuo. The crude compound was purified by chromatography over silica gel (chloroform: methanol 9 : 1, v/v) giving an off-white solid. Yield: 0.18 g (90%). Ms (m/z) 490.31 [M]+.


#### 2.1.5. O-[3-(1,4,8,11-Tetraazabicyclohexadecane)-propyl]-tyrosine (Compound 5, N4-Tyrosine)

Compound 4 (0.25 g; 0.50 mmol) was dissolved in 5 mL of water, and 2.5 mL of 10 N NaOH was added to it. The solution was stirred and refluxed overnight at 90°C, and the solvent was evaporatedin vacuo. The crude compound was then dissolved in 5 mL of water, and the pH of the solution was neutralized to pH 7 by adding 5 M HCl. The final solution was lyophilized overnight to obtain white powder, which was then dissolved in 25 mL of anhydrous methanol, filtered, evaporated, and lyophilized to obtain off-white powder. Yield: 0.19 g (88.78%). = Ms (m/z) 422.31 [M]+.


### 2.2. Radiolabeling of N4-Tyrosine with99mTc

N4-Tyrosine (1 mg) was dissolved in 0.2 mL of sterile water, and tin (II) chloride (0.1 mL, 1 mg/mL) was added. The required amount of Na99mTcO4 was added to the N4-Tyrosine solution at the room temperature. Radiochemical purity was determined by radio-HPLC using an C-18 reverse column (Waters), eluted with a 7 : 3 acetonitrile: water solution (v/v) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/minute.


### 2.3. Determination of the Partition Coefficient

To determine the lipophilicity, 20μL of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine was added into an equal volume mixture of 1-octanol and sterile water in a centrifuge tube. The mixture was vortexed at room temperature for 1 minute and then centrifuged at 5,000 rpm for 5 minutes to allow phase separation. From each phase, 0.1 mL of the aliquot was taken out, and the radioactivity was measured by gamma counter (Cobra Quantum, Packard, MN, USA). The measurement was repeated 3 times, and care was taken to avoid cross-contamination between the phases. The partition coefficient value, expressed as logP, was calculated using the following equation:(1)LogP=log⁡(octanollayerradioactivityinsterilewaterlayerradioactivityin1‐octanollayerradioactivityinsterilewaterlayer)


### 2.4. In Vitro Cellular Uptake

Rat breast tumor cell line 13762 (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD, USA) was used for bothin vitro studies and to create the animal model for in vivo evaluation. All cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium and nutrient mixture F-12 Ham (DMEM/F12; GIBCO, Grand Island, NY) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.Forin vitro cellular uptake analysis, cells were plated onto 6-well tissue culture plates (2 × 105 cells/well) 48 hours before adding the radiotracers and incubated with 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine (0.05 mg/well, 8 μCi/well), 99mTc-N4 (0.025 mg/well, 8 μCi/well), or 18F-FDG (8 μCi/well) for 0–4 hours. After incubation, cells were washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered solution twice and detached using a treatment of 0.5 mL of trypsin for 5 minutes. Cells were then collected, and the radioactivity of the cells was measured in triplicate with a gamma counter (Cobra Quantum). Radioactivity was expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) percent of cellular uptake (%Uptake).


### 2.5. Blood Clearance

All animal work was carried out in the Small Animal Imaging Facility at MD Anderson under a protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. For blood clearance analysis, 3 normal female Fischer 344 rats (150 ± 25 g; Harlan Sprague-Dawley, Indianapolis, IN, USA) were intravenously injected with 30μCi of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine. Blood samples (n=3/rat) were drawn from each rat through the lateral tail vein by microliter pipette (10 μL) at several time points between 5 minutes and 24 hours after injection. The blood samples were measured for radioactivity by gamma counter, and the radioactivity was expressed as a percentage of the injected dose per gram of blood (%ID/g).


### 2.6. Tissue Distribution

Tissue distribution studies of99mTc-N4-Tyrosine were conducted using normal female Fischer 344 rats (150 ± 25 g, n=9). The rats were divided into 3 groups, and each rat was injected intravenously with 25 ± 0.5 μCi of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine. Each group was examined at 1 of 3 time points (0.5, 2, or 4 hours after injection). At each time point, the rats were killed, and the selected tissues were excised, weighed, and measured for radioactivity by gamma counter. For each sample, radioactivity was expressed as mean percentage of the injected dose per gram of tissue wet weight (%ID/g). Counts from a 1/10 diluted sample of the original injection were used as a reference.


### 2.7. OLINDA/EXM Dosimetry Estimates

Rat absorbed dose estimates for99mTc-N4-Tyrosine were computed from biodistribution data. Individual organ and whole-body time-activity curves were fitted to exponential functions using OLINDA/EXM software (version 1.1; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA). These functions were then integrated analytically to determine the area under the curve to yield the residence time of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine in each organ. It was assumed that the injected activity of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine was uniformly distributed throughout the body immediately following injection. Mass correction factors were used to account for the different ratios of organs to total body weight and different scaling of residence times between rats and humans [13]. Residence times were then used to calculate target organ absorbed radiation doses for a 70 kg standard man model using the OLINDA/EXM software.


### 2.8. Planar Scintigraphic Imaging in Breast Tumor-Bearing Rats

Cells from the breast tumor cell line 13762, suspended in phosphate-buffered solution (105 cells/0.1 mL solution per rat), were injected subcutaneously into the right calf muscle of female Fischer 344 rats (n=9). Planar scintigraphic imaging of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine was performed 12–14 days after inoculation when tumors reached approximately 1 cm in diameter. The breast tumor-bearing rats (n=3/time point) were anesthetized and injected intravenously with 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine (0.3 mg/rat, 300 μCi/rat), and images were acquired at 30, 120, and 240 minutes after administration of tracers. Planar scintigraphic images were obtained using M-CAM (Siemens Medical Solutions, Hoffman Estates, IL, USA) equipped with a low-energy high-resolution collimator. Computer-outlined regions of interest (ROIs in counts per pixel) between tumor and muscle tissue were used to calculate tumor-to-muscle (T/M) ratios. Percent of injected dose (%ID) in the tumor was also calculated from the reference standard, which was 1/10 of the original injection activity of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine.


### 2.9. Tumor and Inflammation Uptake Comparison

To investigate whether99mTc-N4-Tyrosine can differentiate tumor tissue from inflammatory tissue, a rat model bearing both a mammary tumor and tissue with turpentine oil-induced inflammation was created. Rat breast tumor cells (from cell line 13762; 105 cells/0.1 mL phosphate-buffered solution per rat) were injected into the right calf muscles of 3 female Fischer 344 rats. After the tumors reached 1 cm in diameter, turpentine oil (0.1 mL/rat) was injected into the left calf muscles of the rats to induce inflammation. The anesthetized rats were injected intravenously with 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine 24 hours after the turpentine injection. Planar scintigraphic images were acquired at 30, 120, and 240 minutes after the 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine injection, and ROIs of the tumor, inflamed tissue, and muscle were used to calculate the tumor-to-muscle ratios (T/Ms), inflammation-to-muscle ratios (I/Ms), and tumor-to-inflammation ratios (T/Is), respectively. The same animal model was used to evaluate 18F-FDG. Micro-PET imaging of 18F-FDG was performed using an R4 micro-PET scanner (Concorde Microsystems, Knoxville, TN, USA). Three breast tumor- and inflammation-bearing rats were injected intravenously with 18F-FDG (500 μCi/rat), and dynamic PET scans with a spatial resolution of 2.2 mm were obtained at 30, 60, and 90 minutes after 18F-FDG injection. PET images were reconstructed by using the ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm. T/M, I/M, and T/I ratios were calculated using the regional radioactivity concentrations (μCi/cm3) that were estimated from the average pixels within ROIs drawn around the tumor, inflamed tissue, or muscle on transverse slices of the reconstructed image sets.


## 2.1. Synthesis of Precursor N4-Tyrosine

### 2.1.1. N-t-Butoxycarbonyl-O-[3-Br-propyl]-L-tyrosine Methyl Ester (Compound 1)

N-t-Butoxycarbonyl-L-tyrosine methyl ester (25.00 g; 0.085 mol) was dissolved in acetone (300 mL). 1,3-Dibromopropane (17.3 mL; 0.169 mol) and K2CO3 (58.00 g; 0.420 mol) were added under a nitrogen atmosphere. The reaction mixture was refluxed at 80°C overnight. After the mixture was cooled and filtered, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was dissolved in chloroform. The residue was washed with water and dried with anhydrous MgSO4. The product was purified by column chromatography using a silica gel column eluted with hexane: ethyl acetate (2 : 1, v/v). Yield: 33.30 g (94.60%). Ms (m/z) = 440.09 [M+Na]+.


### 2.1.2. N1,N4-Dioxylyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazabicyclotetradecane (N1,N4-Cyclooxamide) (Compound 2)

N4 cyclam (15.00 g; 74.88 mmol) was dissolved in 150 mL of anhydrous ethanol, and diethyl oxalate (10.94 g; 74.88 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 18 hours at 75°C. The solvent was rotary evaporated, and the crude product was dissolved in minimum quantity of ethanol and filtered and recrystallized in 400 mL of acetone/ethanol to yield white crystals of compound 2. Yield: 13.64 g (71.62%). Ms (m/z) 255.19 [M]+.


### 2.1.3. N-t-Butoxycarbonyl-O-[3-(N1,N4-dioxylyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazabicyclotetradecane)-propyl]-tyrosine Methyl Ester(Compound 3)

Compound 2 (0.63 g; 2.46 mmol) was dissolved in 20 mL of anhydrous dimethylformamide; it was reacted with a solution of compound 1 (1.06 g; 2.46 mmol) in 40 mL of dimethylformamide under a nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture was refluxed at 75°C for 18 hours and then cooled to room temperature. The reaction mixture was filtered, and the solvent was removedin vacuo. The crude compound was purified via silica gel column using chloroform: methanol solution (9 : 1, v/v). Yield: 0.65 g (1.05 mmol; 42.76%). Ms (m/z) 591.31 [M]+.


### 2.1.4. O-[3-(N1,N4-Dioxylyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazabicyclotetradecane)-propyl]-tyrosine Methyl Ester (Compound 4)

To deprotect N-t-butoxycarbonyl group, Compound 3 (0.60 g; 1.00 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous dichloromethane (15 mL), and 2.5 mL of trifluoroacetic acid was added to it. The solution was stirred overnight at room temperature, and the solvents were then removed in vacuo. The crude compound was purified by chromatography over silica gel (chloroform: methanol 9 : 1, v/v) giving an off-white solid. Yield: 0.18 g (90%). Ms (m/z) 490.31 [M]+.


### 2.1.5. O-[3-(1,4,8,11-Tetraazabicyclohexadecane)-propyl]-tyrosine (Compound 5, N4-Tyrosine)

Compound 4 (0.25 g; 0.50 mmol) was dissolved in 5 mL of water, and 2.5 mL of 10 N NaOH was added to it. The solution was stirred and refluxed overnight at 90°C, and the solvent was evaporatedin vacuo. The crude compound was then dissolved in 5 mL of water, and the pH of the solution was neutralized to pH 7 by adding 5 M HCl. The final solution was lyophilized overnight to obtain white powder, which was then dissolved in 25 mL of anhydrous methanol, filtered, evaporated, and lyophilized to obtain off-white powder. Yield: 0.19 g (88.78%). = Ms (m/z) 422.31 [M]+.


## 2.1.1. N-t-Butoxycarbonyl-O-[3-Br-propyl]-L-tyrosine Methyl Ester (Compound 1)

N-t-Butoxycarbonyl-L-tyrosine methyl ester (25.00 g; 0.085 mol) was dissolved in acetone (300 mL). 1,3-Dibromopropane (17.3 mL; 0.169 mol) and K2CO3 (58.00 g; 0.420 mol) were added under a nitrogen atmosphere. The reaction mixture was refluxed at 80°C overnight. After the mixture was cooled and filtered, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was dissolved in chloroform. The residue was washed with water and dried with anhydrous MgSO4. The product was purified by column chromatography using a silica gel column eluted with hexane: ethyl acetate (2 : 1, v/v). Yield: 33.30 g (94.60%). Ms (m/z) = 440.09 [M+Na]+.


## 2.1.2. N1,N4-Dioxylyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazabicyclotetradecane (N1,N4-Cyclooxamide) (Compound 2)

N4 cyclam (15.00 g; 74.88 mmol) was dissolved in 150 mL of anhydrous ethanol, and diethyl oxalate (10.94 g; 74.88 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 18 hours at 75°C. The solvent was rotary evaporated, and the crude product was dissolved in minimum quantity of ethanol and filtered and recrystallized in 400 mL of acetone/ethanol to yield white crystals of compound 2. Yield: 13.64 g (71.62%). Ms (m/z) 255.19 [M]+.


## 2.1.3. N-t-Butoxycarbonyl-O-[3-(N1,N4-dioxylyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazabicyclotetradecane)-propyl]-tyrosine Methyl Ester(Compound 3)

Compound 2 (0.63 g; 2.46 mmol) was dissolved in 20 mL of anhydrous dimethylformamide; it was reacted with a solution of compound 1 (1.06 g; 2.46 mmol) in 40 mL of dimethylformamide under a nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture was refluxed at 75°C for 18 hours and then cooled to room temperature. The reaction mixture was filtered, and the solvent was removedin vacuo. The crude compound was purified via silica gel column using chloroform: methanol solution (9 : 1, v/v). Yield: 0.65 g (1.05 mmol; 42.76%). Ms (m/z) 591.31 [M]+.


## 2.1.4. O-[3-(N1,N4-Dioxylyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazabicyclotetradecane)-propyl]-tyrosine Methyl Ester (Compound 4)

To deprotect N-t-butoxycarbonyl group, Compound 3 (0.60 g; 1.00 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous dichloromethane (15 mL), and 2.5 mL of trifluoroacetic acid was added to it. The solution was stirred overnight at room temperature, and the solvents were then removed in vacuo. The crude compound was purified by chromatography over silica gel (chloroform: methanol 9 : 1, v/v) giving an off-white solid. Yield: 0.18 g (90%). Ms (m/z) 490.31 [M]+.


## 2.1.5. O-[3-(1,4,8,11-Tetraazabicyclohexadecane)-propyl]-tyrosine (Compound 5, N4-Tyrosine)

Compound 4 (0.25 g; 0.50 mmol) was dissolved in 5 mL of water, and 2.5 mL of 10 N NaOH was added to it. The solution was stirred and refluxed overnight at 90°C, and the solvent was evaporatedin vacuo. The crude compound was then dissolved in 5 mL of water, and the pH of the solution was neutralized to pH 7 by adding 5 M HCl. The final solution was lyophilized overnight to obtain white powder, which was then dissolved in 25 mL of anhydrous methanol, filtered, evaporated, and lyophilized to obtain off-white powder. Yield: 0.19 g (88.78%). = Ms (m/z) 422.31 [M]+.


## 2.2. Radiolabeling of N4-Tyrosine with99mTc

N4-Tyrosine (1 mg) was dissolved in 0.2 mL of sterile water, and tin (II) chloride (0.1 mL, 1 mg/mL) was added. The required amount of Na99mTcO4 was added to the N4-Tyrosine solution at the room temperature. Radiochemical purity was determined by radio-HPLC using an C-18 reverse column (Waters), eluted with a 7 : 3 acetonitrile: water solution (v/v) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/minute.


## 2.3. Determination of the Partition Coefficient

To determine the lipophilicity, 20μL of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine was added into an equal volume mixture of 1-octanol and sterile water in a centrifuge tube. The mixture was vortexed at room temperature for 1 minute and then centrifuged at 5,000 rpm for 5 minutes to allow phase separation. From each phase, 0.1 mL of the aliquot was taken out, and the radioactivity was measured by gamma counter (Cobra Quantum, Packard, MN, USA). The measurement was repeated 3 times, and care was taken to avoid cross-contamination between the phases. The partition coefficient value, expressed as logP, was calculated using the following equation:(1)LogP=log⁡(octanollayerradioactivityinsterilewaterlayerradioactivityin1‐octanollayerradioactivityinsterilewaterlayer)


## 2.4. In Vitro Cellular Uptake

Rat breast tumor cell line 13762 (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD, USA) was used for bothin vitro studies and to create the animal model for in vivo evaluation. All cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium and nutrient mixture F-12 Ham (DMEM/F12; GIBCO, Grand Island, NY) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.Forin vitro cellular uptake analysis, cells were plated onto 6-well tissue culture plates (2 × 105 cells/well) 48 hours before adding the radiotracers and incubated with 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine (0.05 mg/well, 8 μCi/well), 99mTc-N4 (0.025 mg/well, 8 μCi/well), or 18F-FDG (8 μCi/well) for 0–4 hours. After incubation, cells were washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered solution twice and detached using a treatment of 0.5 mL of trypsin for 5 minutes. Cells were then collected, and the radioactivity of the cells was measured in triplicate with a gamma counter (Cobra Quantum). Radioactivity was expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) percent of cellular uptake (%Uptake).


## 2.5. Blood Clearance

All animal work was carried out in the Small Animal Imaging Facility at MD Anderson under a protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. For blood clearance analysis, 3 normal female Fischer 344 rats (150 ± 25 g; Harlan Sprague-Dawley, Indianapolis, IN, USA) were intravenously injected with 30μCi of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine. Blood samples (n=3/rat) were drawn from each rat through the lateral tail vein by microliter pipette (10 μL) at several time points between 5 minutes and 24 hours after injection. The blood samples were measured for radioactivity by gamma counter, and the radioactivity was expressed as a percentage of the injected dose per gram of blood (%ID/g).


## 2.6. Tissue Distribution

Tissue distribution studies of99mTc-N4-Tyrosine were conducted using normal female Fischer 344 rats (150 ± 25 g, n=9). The rats were divided into 3 groups, and each rat was injected intravenously with 25 ± 0.5 μCi of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine. Each group was examined at 1 of 3 time points (0.5, 2, or 4 hours after injection). At each time point, the rats were killed, and the selected tissues were excised, weighed, and measured for radioactivity by gamma counter. For each sample, radioactivity was expressed as mean percentage of the injected dose per gram of tissue wet weight (%ID/g). Counts from a 1/10 diluted sample of the original injection were used as a reference.


## 2.7. OLINDA/EXM Dosimetry Estimates

Rat absorbed dose estimates for99mTc-N4-Tyrosine were computed from biodistribution data. Individual organ and whole-body time-activity curves were fitted to exponential functions using OLINDA/EXM software (version 1.1; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA). These functions were then integrated analytically to determine the area under the curve to yield the residence time of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine in each organ. It was assumed that the injected activity of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine was uniformly distributed throughout the body immediately following injection. Mass correction factors were used to account for the different ratios of organs to total body weight and different scaling of residence times between rats and humans [13]. Residence times were then used to calculate target organ absorbed radiation doses for a 70 kg standard man model using the OLINDA/EXM software.


## 2.8. Planar Scintigraphic Imaging in Breast Tumor-Bearing Rats

Cells from the breast tumor cell line 13762, suspended in phosphate-buffered solution (105 cells/0.1 mL solution per rat), were injected subcutaneously into the right calf muscle of female Fischer 344 rats (n=9). Planar scintigraphic imaging of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine was performed 12–14 days after inoculation when tumors reached approximately 1 cm in diameter. The breast tumor-bearing rats (n=3/time point) were anesthetized and injected intravenously with 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine (0.3 mg/rat, 300 μCi/rat), and images were acquired at 30, 120, and 240 minutes after administration of tracers. Planar scintigraphic images were obtained using M-CAM (Siemens Medical Solutions, Hoffman Estates, IL, USA) equipped with a low-energy high-resolution collimator. Computer-outlined regions of interest (ROIs in counts per pixel) between tumor and muscle tissue were used to calculate tumor-to-muscle (T/M) ratios. Percent of injected dose (%ID) in the tumor was also calculated from the reference standard, which was 1/10 of the original injection activity of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine.


## 2.9. Tumor and Inflammation Uptake Comparison

To investigate whether99mTc-N4-Tyrosine can differentiate tumor tissue from inflammatory tissue, a rat model bearing both a mammary tumor and tissue with turpentine oil-induced inflammation was created. Rat breast tumor cells (from cell line 13762; 105 cells/0.1 mL phosphate-buffered solution per rat) were injected into the right calf muscles of 3 female Fischer 344 rats. After the tumors reached 1 cm in diameter, turpentine oil (0.1 mL/rat) was injected into the left calf muscles of the rats to induce inflammation. The anesthetized rats were injected intravenously with 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine 24 hours after the turpentine injection. Planar scintigraphic images were acquired at 30, 120, and 240 minutes after the 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine injection, and ROIs of the tumor, inflamed tissue, and muscle were used to calculate the tumor-to-muscle ratios (T/Ms), inflammation-to-muscle ratios (I/Ms), and tumor-to-inflammation ratios (T/Is), respectively. The same animal model was used to evaluate 18F-FDG. Micro-PET imaging of 18F-FDG was performed using an R4 micro-PET scanner (Concorde Microsystems, Knoxville, TN, USA). Three breast tumor- and inflammation-bearing rats were injected intravenously with 18F-FDG (500 μCi/rat), and dynamic PET scans with a spatial resolution of 2.2 mm were obtained at 30, 60, and 90 minutes after 18F-FDG injection. PET images were reconstructed by using the ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm. T/M, I/M, and T/I ratios were calculated using the regional radioactivity concentrations (μCi/cm3) that were estimated from the average pixels within ROIs drawn around the tumor, inflamed tissue, or muscle on transverse slices of the reconstructed image sets.


## 3. Results and Discussion

As mentioned previously, radiolabeled amino acid analogues have shown great potentials in cancer imaging by targeting the increased amino acids uptake in tumor cells. In the present study, we report the synthesis of99mTc-labeled tyrosine using (N4) cyclam as a chelator and evaluate its potential in breast cancer diagnosis using the breast tumor models in vitro and in vivo.


### 3.1. Chemistry and Radiochemistry

The total synthesis yield of precursor N4-Tyrosine via our 5-step procedure was 38%. The synthetic scheme is shown in Figure1. The structure and purity of N4-Tyrosine were confirmed by 1H- and 13C-NMR, mass spectra, and HPLC. The 1H-NMR results (D2O δ, ppm) were as follows: 7.18 (d, 2H, phenyl ring), 6.95 (d, 2H, phenyl ring), 4.073 (t, 2H, O-CH2), 3.43 (t, 1H, CHN), 2.28–3.00 (m, 2OH, OCH2 and NCH2-), 1.87–1.91(m, 2H, C-CH2-C), and 1.68–1.79 (m, 4H, C-CH2-C). 13C- NMR results (D2O δ, ppm) were as follows: 162.88, 156.72, 130.76, 117.57, 115.25, 68.55, 57.29, 53.91, 51.56, 49.95, 49.17, 48.96, 48.24, 48.03, 46.80, 45.73, 45.35, 39.27, 24.90, 24.31, and 23.87. Because the starting material, N-t-butoxycarbonyl-L-tyrosine methyl ester, was commercially available, the synthetic yield of N4-Tyrosine in our study was much higher (38%) than that of its α-methyl derivative N4-AMT (14%), which was reported in a previous study [14].Figure 1
Synthetic scheme of precursor N4-Tyrosine.For the radiolabeling, the top and middle panels of Figure2 show the ultraviolet absorbance of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine at 210 nm and 274 nm, while the bottom panel indicates the peak from NaI detector that only detects the radioactivity. Since precursor N4-Tyrosine has a unique ultraviolet absorbance at 274 nm, we selected 274 nm for one of the ultraviolet detectors. On the other hand, the 210 nm detector can detect almost every molecule; therefore, we were able to detect any impurities in our compound. The retention time of three detectors matched very well, which indicated precursor N4-Tyrosine was labeled with 99mTc successfully with high radiochemical purity (>95%). Because 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine is a kit product and labeled without any further purification, its radiochemical yield was assumed to be identical to its radiochemical purity. For the partition coefficient value, the logP of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine was −2.83±0.082, which was lower than that of its α-methyl derivative 99mTc-N4-AMT (−2.02±0.168). Since the logP value is positively correlated with lipophilicity of the compound, we found that the lipophilicity of the tyrosine-based radiotracer could be increased by adding a methyl group on its α-carbon.High-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of99mTc-N4-Tyrosine at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/minute using a C-18 reverse column under ultraviolet absorbance of 210 nm (a) and 274 nm (b), as well as under a NaI radioactivity detector (c).
(a)(b)(c)


### 3.2. In Vitro Cellular Uptake Evaluation

The cellular uptake kinetics of99mTc-N4-Tyrosine, 99mTc-N4, and 18F-FDG in rat breast tumor cells is shown in Figure 3. The uptake for 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine increased dramatically up to 240 minutes, but this was not true for the 99mTc-N4 chelator, suggesting that 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine can enter tumor cells specifically and accumulate rapidly. In addition, the mean %Uptake of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine was much higher than that of 18F-FDG, which indicated that 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine had better imaging potential than 18F-FDG in this in vitro breast cancer model.Figure 3
In vitro cellular uptake of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine, 99mTc-N4, and 18F-FDG in cells from rat breast tumor cell line 13762. Data are expressed as mean percent of cellular uptake ± standard deviation (%Uptake ± SD) measured at 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 minutes after coincubation with 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine.


### 3.3. In Vivo Evaluation in Normal Fischer 344 Rats

The blood clearance curve for99mTc-N4-Tyrosine in normal Fischer 344 rats is shown in Figure 4. The plasma half-life of the distribution phase (t1/2α) was 9.31±0.759 minutes, and the plasma half-life of the elimination phase (t1/2β) was 90.14±1.901 minutes, indicating that 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine had relatively fast blood clearance in normal rats.Figure 4
Blood clearance curve of99mTc-N4-Tyrosine in normal female Fischer 344 rats (n=3). Mean radioactivity is expressed as mean percentage of the injected dose per gram of blood ± standard deviation (%ID/g ± SD).Tissue distribution of99mTc-N4-Tyrosine in normal Fischer 344 rats is shown in Table 1. Low thyroid and stomach uptake of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine was observed, suggesting that 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine has high stability in vivo. High uptake was found in the kidneys, which was consistent with the planar scintigraphic imaging findings in the breast tumor-bearing rats (see Figure 5). This high kidney uptake may be a result of the low lipophilicity of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine, or it may be related to the biological characteristics of 99mTc-labeled tyrosine because similar results were also observed in the previously developed tyrosine-based radiotracers 99mTc-N4-AMT, 99mTc-EC-AMT, and 99mTc-EC-Tyrosine [14, 15].Table 1
In vivo tissue distribution of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine in normal Fischer 344 rats (n=3) at 30, 120, and 240 minutes after injection.
Organ30MIN120MIN240MINBlood0.88±0.0400.20±0.0180.17±0.009Heart0.21±0.0220.06±0.0030.05±0.003Lung0.50±0.0230.19±0.0110.14±0.006Thyroid0.34±0.0190.10±0.0100.09±0.006Pancreas0.17±0.0170.07±0.0120.05±0.002Liver1.15±0.0590.70±0.0400.67±0.044Spleen0.94±0.0890.76±0.0320.63±0.051Kidney11.05±0.78312.34±0.50212.40±0.405Stomach0.20±0.0180.08±0.0030.06±0.002Intestine0.34±0.0570.13±0.0100.11±0.006Muscle0.07±0.0070.03±0.0020.02±0.001Bone and joint0.24±0.0210.15±0.0080.12±0.008Brain0.03±0.0010.02±0.0010.01±0.001Each value indicates the percent of injected dose per gram of wet weight (%ID/g,n=3/time point). Each data represents mean of three measurements with standard deviation.Figure 5
The selected planar scintigraphic images of breast tumor-bearing rats at 30, 120, and 240 minutes after99mTc-N4-Tyrosine injection (T indicates tumor; T/M, tumor-to-muscle ratio; tumor %ID, percent of injected dose in the tumor).To estimate the maximum dose of99mTc-N4-Tyrosine that could be safely administered to humans, individual organ absorbed radiation doses were calculated using OLINDA/EXM software. Estimates of the doses per unit administered are shown in Table 2. The kidneys received the highest absorbed dose (4.86E-02 mSv/MBq or 1.80E-01 rem/mCi), which made it the dose-limiting organ. Other organs with relatively high absorbed radiation doses included the heart wall, spleen, and liver. According to the US Food and Drug Administration regulations, human exposure to radiation from the use of “radioactive research drugs” should be limited to 3 rem per single administration and 5 rem per year to the whole body, blood-forming organs (red marrow, osteogenic cells, spleen), the lens of the eye, and gonads (testes and uterus); the limit for other organs is 5 rem per single administration and 15 rem annually. Total rem of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine absorbed by each organ was below these limits at the proposed injection of 15 mCi per patient.Table 2
Absorbed radiation dose estimates (dose per unit injected into a 70 kg adult man) for99mTc-N4-Tyrosine.
Target organAbsorbed radiation dose estimatesHuman dose (15 mCi)mSv/MBqrem/mCiremAdrenals4.65E-031.72E-022.58E-01Brain4.69E-041.74E-032.61E-02Breasts1.27E-034.72E-037.08E-02Gallbladder wall3.79E-031.40E-022.10E-01Lower large intestine wall1.62E-036.00E-039.00E-02Small intestine2.70E-031.00E-021.50E-01Stomach wall2.49E-039.21E-031.38E-01Upper large intestine wall2.44E-039.04E-031.36E-01Heart wall8.51E-033.15E-024.73E-01Kidneys4.86E-021.80E-012.70E+00Liver5.52E-032.04E-023.06E-01Lungs2.27E-038.41E-031.26E-01Muscle1.34E-034.96E-037.44E-02Ovaries1.76E-036.53E-039.80E-02Pancreas3.76E-031.39E-022.09E-01Red marrow1.91E-037.07E-031.06E-01Osteogenic cells5.21E-031.93E-022.90E-01Skin8.91E-043.30E-034.95E-02Spleen5.66E-032.09E-023.14E-01Testes7.91E-042.93E-034.40E-02Thymus2.29E-038.47E-031.27E-01Thyroid1.25E-034.61E-036.92E-02Urinary bladder wall1.39E-035.14E-037.71E-02Uterus1.77E-036.53E-039.80E-02Total Body1.98E-037.32E-031.10E-01Effective dose equivalent5.71E-032.11E-023.17E-01Effective dose2.19E-038.11E-031.22E-01


### 3.4. In Vivo Evaluation in Breast Tumor-Bearing Rats

The selected planar scintigraphic images of breast tumor-bearing rats at 30, 120, and 240 minutes after99mTc-N4-Tyrosine injection are shown in Figure 5. The T/M ratios at 30, 120, and 240 minutes were 5.12, 4.88, and 5.20, respectively. Tumor %ID at these three time points were 1.82%, 1.87%, and 1.71%, respectively. Tumors could be clearly detected by 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine at all time points.The selected planar scintigraphic images of breast tumor- and inflammation-bearing rats at 30, 120, and 240 minutes after99mTc-N4-Tyrosine injection, as well as micro-PET images at 30, 60, and 90 minutes after 18F-FDG injection, are shown in Figure 6. The T/M ratio of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine was relatively higher than I/M ratio at each time point. Although T/I ratios were greater than 1 at all time points for both 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine and 18F-DFG, indicating that the tumor had higher uptake than the inflammation site, the T/I ratios for 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine were lower than those for 18F-FDG. This suggests that 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine was inferior to 18F-FDG in differentiating tumor from inflammation in this breast tumor-bearing rat model. However, we used turpentine to induce inflammation chemically in this model. It may be worth testing 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine in another animal model using radiation to induce inflammation so that the model better mimics patients undergoing radiation therapy.Figure 6
The selected planar scintigraphic images of breast tumor- and inflammation-bearing rats at 30, 120, and 240 minutes after99mTc-N4-Tyrosine injection and micro-PET images at 30, 60, and 90 minutes after 18F-FDG injection (T indicates tumor; I, inflammation). Tumor-to-muscle (T/M), inflammation-to-muscle (I/M), and tumor-to-inflammation (T/I) ratios are shown in the tables.


## 3.1. Chemistry and Radiochemistry

The total synthesis yield of precursor N4-Tyrosine via our 5-step procedure was 38%. The synthetic scheme is shown in Figure1. The structure and purity of N4-Tyrosine were confirmed by 1H- and 13C-NMR, mass spectra, and HPLC. The 1H-NMR results (D2O δ, ppm) were as follows: 7.18 (d, 2H, phenyl ring), 6.95 (d, 2H, phenyl ring), 4.073 (t, 2H, O-CH2), 3.43 (t, 1H, CHN), 2.28–3.00 (m, 2OH, OCH2 and NCH2-), 1.87–1.91(m, 2H, C-CH2-C), and 1.68–1.79 (m, 4H, C-CH2-C). 13C- NMR results (D2O δ, ppm) were as follows: 162.88, 156.72, 130.76, 117.57, 115.25, 68.55, 57.29, 53.91, 51.56, 49.95, 49.17, 48.96, 48.24, 48.03, 46.80, 45.73, 45.35, 39.27, 24.90, 24.31, and 23.87. Because the starting material, N-t-butoxycarbonyl-L-tyrosine methyl ester, was commercially available, the synthetic yield of N4-Tyrosine in our study was much higher (38%) than that of its α-methyl derivative N4-AMT (14%), which was reported in a previous study [14].Figure 1
Synthetic scheme of precursor N4-Tyrosine.For the radiolabeling, the top and middle panels of Figure2 show the ultraviolet absorbance of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine at 210 nm and 274 nm, while the bottom panel indicates the peak from NaI detector that only detects the radioactivity. Since precursor N4-Tyrosine has a unique ultraviolet absorbance at 274 nm, we selected 274 nm for one of the ultraviolet detectors. On the other hand, the 210 nm detector can detect almost every molecule; therefore, we were able to detect any impurities in our compound. The retention time of three detectors matched very well, which indicated precursor N4-Tyrosine was labeled with 99mTc successfully with high radiochemical purity (>95%). Because 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine is a kit product and labeled without any further purification, its radiochemical yield was assumed to be identical to its radiochemical purity. For the partition coefficient value, the logP of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine was −2.83±0.082, which was lower than that of its α-methyl derivative 99mTc-N4-AMT (−2.02±0.168). Since the logP value is positively correlated with lipophilicity of the compound, we found that the lipophilicity of the tyrosine-based radiotracer could be increased by adding a methyl group on its α-carbon.High-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of99mTc-N4-Tyrosine at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/minute using a C-18 reverse column under ultraviolet absorbance of 210 nm (a) and 274 nm (b), as well as under a NaI radioactivity detector (c).
(a)(b)(c)


## 3.2. In Vitro Cellular Uptake Evaluation

The cellular uptake kinetics of99mTc-N4-Tyrosine, 99mTc-N4, and 18F-FDG in rat breast tumor cells is shown in Figure 3. The uptake for 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine increased dramatically up to 240 minutes, but this was not true for the 99mTc-N4 chelator, suggesting that 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine can enter tumor cells specifically and accumulate rapidly. In addition, the mean %Uptake of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine was much higher than that of 18F-FDG, which indicated that 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine had better imaging potential than 18F-FDG in this in vitro breast cancer model.Figure 3
In vitro cellular uptake of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine, 99mTc-N4, and 18F-FDG in cells from rat breast tumor cell line 13762. Data are expressed as mean percent of cellular uptake ± standard deviation (%Uptake ± SD) measured at 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 minutes after coincubation with 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine.


## 3.3. In Vivo Evaluation in Normal Fischer 344 Rats

The blood clearance curve for99mTc-N4-Tyrosine in normal Fischer 344 rats is shown in Figure 4. The plasma half-life of the distribution phase (t1/2α) was 9.31±0.759 minutes, and the plasma half-life of the elimination phase (t1/2β) was 90.14±1.901 minutes, indicating that 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine had relatively fast blood clearance in normal rats.Figure 4
Blood clearance curve of99mTc-N4-Tyrosine in normal female Fischer 344 rats (n=3). Mean radioactivity is expressed as mean percentage of the injected dose per gram of blood ± standard deviation (%ID/g ± SD).Tissue distribution of99mTc-N4-Tyrosine in normal Fischer 344 rats is shown in Table 1. Low thyroid and stomach uptake of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine was observed, suggesting that 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine has high stability in vivo. High uptake was found in the kidneys, which was consistent with the planar scintigraphic imaging findings in the breast tumor-bearing rats (see Figure 5). This high kidney uptake may be a result of the low lipophilicity of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine, or it may be related to the biological characteristics of 99mTc-labeled tyrosine because similar results were also observed in the previously developed tyrosine-based radiotracers 99mTc-N4-AMT, 99mTc-EC-AMT, and 99mTc-EC-Tyrosine [14, 15].Table 1
In vivo tissue distribution of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine in normal Fischer 344 rats (n=3) at 30, 120, and 240 minutes after injection.
Organ30MIN120MIN240MINBlood0.88±0.0400.20±0.0180.17±0.009Heart0.21±0.0220.06±0.0030.05±0.003Lung0.50±0.0230.19±0.0110.14±0.006Thyroid0.34±0.0190.10±0.0100.09±0.006Pancreas0.17±0.0170.07±0.0120.05±0.002Liver1.15±0.0590.70±0.0400.67±0.044Spleen0.94±0.0890.76±0.0320.63±0.051Kidney11.05±0.78312.34±0.50212.40±0.405Stomach0.20±0.0180.08±0.0030.06±0.002Intestine0.34±0.0570.13±0.0100.11±0.006Muscle0.07±0.0070.03±0.0020.02±0.001Bone and joint0.24±0.0210.15±0.0080.12±0.008Brain0.03±0.0010.02±0.0010.01±0.001Each value indicates the percent of injected dose per gram of wet weight (%ID/g,n=3/time point). Each data represents mean of three measurements with standard deviation.Figure 5
The selected planar scintigraphic images of breast tumor-bearing rats at 30, 120, and 240 minutes after99mTc-N4-Tyrosine injection (T indicates tumor; T/M, tumor-to-muscle ratio; tumor %ID, percent of injected dose in the tumor).To estimate the maximum dose of99mTc-N4-Tyrosine that could be safely administered to humans, individual organ absorbed radiation doses were calculated using OLINDA/EXM software. Estimates of the doses per unit administered are shown in Table 2. The kidneys received the highest absorbed dose (4.86E-02 mSv/MBq or 1.80E-01 rem/mCi), which made it the dose-limiting organ. Other organs with relatively high absorbed radiation doses included the heart wall, spleen, and liver. According to the US Food and Drug Administration regulations, human exposure to radiation from the use of “radioactive research drugs” should be limited to 3 rem per single administration and 5 rem per year to the whole body, blood-forming organs (red marrow, osteogenic cells, spleen), the lens of the eye, and gonads (testes and uterus); the limit for other organs is 5 rem per single administration and 15 rem annually. Total rem of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine absorbed by each organ was below these limits at the proposed injection of 15 mCi per patient.Table 2
Absorbed radiation dose estimates (dose per unit injected into a 70 kg adult man) for99mTc-N4-Tyrosine.
Target organAbsorbed radiation dose estimatesHuman dose (15 mCi)mSv/MBqrem/mCiremAdrenals4.65E-031.72E-022.58E-01Brain4.69E-041.74E-032.61E-02Breasts1.27E-034.72E-037.08E-02Gallbladder wall3.79E-031.40E-022.10E-01Lower large intestine wall1.62E-036.00E-039.00E-02Small intestine2.70E-031.00E-021.50E-01Stomach wall2.49E-039.21E-031.38E-01Upper large intestine wall2.44E-039.04E-031.36E-01Heart wall8.51E-033.15E-024.73E-01Kidneys4.86E-021.80E-012.70E+00Liver5.52E-032.04E-023.06E-01Lungs2.27E-038.41E-031.26E-01Muscle1.34E-034.96E-037.44E-02Ovaries1.76E-036.53E-039.80E-02Pancreas3.76E-031.39E-022.09E-01Red marrow1.91E-037.07E-031.06E-01Osteogenic cells5.21E-031.93E-022.90E-01Skin8.91E-043.30E-034.95E-02Spleen5.66E-032.09E-023.14E-01Testes7.91E-042.93E-034.40E-02Thymus2.29E-038.47E-031.27E-01Thyroid1.25E-034.61E-036.92E-02Urinary bladder wall1.39E-035.14E-037.71E-02Uterus1.77E-036.53E-039.80E-02Total Body1.98E-037.32E-031.10E-01Effective dose equivalent5.71E-032.11E-023.17E-01Effective dose2.19E-038.11E-031.22E-01


## 3.4. In Vivo Evaluation in Breast Tumor-Bearing Rats

The selected planar scintigraphic images of breast tumor-bearing rats at 30, 120, and 240 minutes after99mTc-N4-Tyrosine injection are shown in Figure 5. The T/M ratios at 30, 120, and 240 minutes were 5.12, 4.88, and 5.20, respectively. Tumor %ID at these three time points were 1.82%, 1.87%, and 1.71%, respectively. Tumors could be clearly detected by 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine at all time points.The selected planar scintigraphic images of breast tumor- and inflammation-bearing rats at 30, 120, and 240 minutes after99mTc-N4-Tyrosine injection, as well as micro-PET images at 30, 60, and 90 minutes after 18F-FDG injection, are shown in Figure 6. The T/M ratio of 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine was relatively higher than I/M ratio at each time point. Although T/I ratios were greater than 1 at all time points for both 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine and 18F-DFG, indicating that the tumor had higher uptake than the inflammation site, the T/I ratios for 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine were lower than those for 18F-FDG. This suggests that 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine was inferior to 18F-FDG in differentiating tumor from inflammation in this breast tumor-bearing rat model. However, we used turpentine to induce inflammation chemically in this model. It may be worth testing 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine in another animal model using radiation to induce inflammation so that the model better mimics patients undergoing radiation therapy.Figure 6
The selected planar scintigraphic images of breast tumor- and inflammation-bearing rats at 30, 120, and 240 minutes after99mTc-N4-Tyrosine injection and micro-PET images at 30, 60, and 90 minutes after 18F-FDG injection (T indicates tumor; I, inflammation). Tumor-to-muscle (T/M), inflammation-to-muscle (I/M), and tumor-to-inflammation (T/I) ratios are shown in the tables.


## 4. Conclusion

In summary, N4-Tyrosine was synthesized and labeled efficiently with99mTc with high radiochemical purity. Although it appears to inferior 18F-FDG in distinguishing breast tumor tissue from chemical-induced inflammatory tissue, 99mTc-N4-Tyrosine has high tumor-to-muscle uptake ratios and can detect breast tumor tissue clearly by gamma camera. By taking the advantage of chelator N4 cyclam, we could label N4-Tyrosine with gallium-68 for PET imaging and, furthermore, labeled with rhenium-188 for radionuclide therapy for breast cancer treatment in future.



---

*Source: 671708-2012-03-05.xml*