# A Propagation Loss Coefficient Model of Low-Frequency Elastic Wave in Coal Strata Set

Authors: Yinjing Guo; Yuanyuan Ju; Zhen Liu; Jianhua Zhang
Journal: Mathematical Problems in Engineering
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

Elastic waves cause energy loss during the transmission of coal measures. These losses include propagation loss, dielectric absorption loss, scattering loss, and frequency migration loss. The absorption loss is mainly caused by the inelastic absorption. The scattering loss is caused by the uneven heat absorption in the formation. The frequency shift loss is caused by the piezoelectric effect of coal-bearing formations and the intermodulation of different frequency signals. After considering the influence factors of the coal seam structure, this paper presents a model of low-frequency elastic waves loss coefficient. The paper proposed the loss coefficient of the elastic wave in the coal measure strata by considering two main attenuation mechanisms: intrinsic absorption and scattering. This paper theoretically studied the effects of the model parameters such as density, porosity, particle size, and wave frequency on the loss of wave energy using COMSOL simulation. Besides, the comparison of MATLAB simulation results shows that the simulation results produced by the model proposed in this paper are similar to the models embedded in COMSOL. This work can be applied to coal, oil, and gas exploration and is also helpful to study the mechanisms of wave attention on the low-frequency band.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

A portion of the energy of an elastic wave will be lost when the elastic wave propagates in a coal medium because of the nonperfect flexible and inhomogeneous characteristics of the medium. The sources of loss include absorption, scattering loss, and frequency migration loss. Determining the generating mechanism of these losses is critical in identifying the elastic wave propagation characteristics in the stratum.Chirdon et al. propose an elastic wave energy attenuation model to describe these losses in 2006 [1]. They deduced the formula for the wavelet scale domain according to the existing scale energy formula and the propagation equation of a seismic wave of a viscoelastic medium. In some cases, the formula model can be directly used to estimate attenuation factors of the observed seismic reflection data. In other cases, the model is considered overly complicated by some researchers, who instead selected other methods [2–4], such as the control variable method, even though such practices are inadequate at describing the losses. The control variable method has been used to analyze the influence of the frequency, propagation velocity, propagation distance, and quality factor on amplitude loss [5].Miller et al. focus on the study of wave scattering and attenuation in fiber-reinforced composite laminates. They considered the interfacial damage to wave attenuation. The attenuation due to cracks and frequencies was investigated. It can be shown that a critical rate exists on a given crack size for which the attenuation in the composite medium is at its highest value. Furthermore, the wave attenuation in composite laminates is investigated by incorporating energy transfer onto a layer-wise medium. The overall attenuation coefficient for the laminate is obtained [6]. The ray-tracing method is another method that is often used to simulate the characteristics of elastic wave propagation attenuation and plane elastic waves propagation. Song et al. perform ray tracing based on an accurate near-surface velocity model to extract the signal from shot data and calculate macro-Q value based on the centroid frequency shift method. The above two dimensions of the Q value model were merged by information fusion of different scales to build a complete near-surface Q simulation. Finally, prestack seismic data were compensated by way of the absorption attenuation method based on CMP gather, and subsequent processing was performed [7]. The actual numerical application proves the effectiveness of the strategy [8]. Tao presented a wave attenuation regularity equation in detail using the ray-tracing method [9]. The results showed that the absorption loss of an elastic wave is considerably more significant than the power loss caused by interface reflection on the case of incident angle changes in small increments. The final formula accurately simulated the absorption, but scattering loss was not considered.In recent years, scholars have conducted in-depth research on the attenuation characteristics of elastic wave propagation [10, 11] or the propagation characteristics of seismic waves of elastic media. Many methods reveal part of the elastic wave propagation rules of different research perspectives and provide different respective formula models. We propose another loss coefficient model of a low-frequency elastic wave of coal measure strata to solve the theoretical problems associated with estimating the propagation loss.


## 2. Analysis of Coal Measure Strata Loss

Coal measure strata are nonperfect elastomers. When an elastic wave is propagating in the layers, the stream will undergo dielectric absorption loss, scattering loss, and frequency transfer loss [12, 13]. The inelastic level and heat absorption mainly cause absorption loss. Scattering loss results from the nonuniformity of the stratum, and frequency transfer loss is caused by the piezoelectric effect of the layer [14]. To efficiently analyze these losses, we often assume that there is a vibration source of the isotropic coal seam and that an elastic wave propagates in a single direction of the longitudinal wave.First, we assume that an elastic wave propagates fromr to r+Δr; then, the relative change of an elastic wave energy loss can be written as the following equation:(1)Er+Δr−ErEr=ηa+ηs+ηmΔr,where ηa is the absorption loss coefficient, ηs is the scattering loss coefficient, and ηm is the frequency transfer loss coefficient; these coefficients are all negative and are in decibels. η=ηa+ηs+ηm is a coefficient that represents the characteristic of wave energy loss, and the features of the medium determine it. When Δr⟶0, we obtain the equation(2)dErdr=ηEr.Solving this differential equation, we obtain(3)Er=Keηr+k0r=Keηareηsreηmr,where K=Err=0 denotes the source energy, η is the loss coefficient, and r is the propagation distance.Equation (3) shows that if η is a constant, the elastic wave energy will be lost with increasing propagation distance according to the index law. Larger values of η and r lead to more significant elastic wave losses in the coal measure strata.


### 2.1. Absorption

The existing research has shown that absorption loss has the following several influencing factors:(i)
Elastic wave frequency. A higher frequency leads to more significant damage, and vice versa. The elastic waves propagate in the medium and convert mechanical energy into heat energy. A higher rate results in a smaller wavelength, and a lower proportion of medium-sized particles makes it easier to transmit mechanical power to the medium; i.e., ηa is positively related to the frequency.(ii)
All physical properties of the coal measure strata medium, such as lithology of coal measure strata, elasticity, density, porosity, and viscosity, affect absorption. Flexibility is associated with lower absorption loss. A more compact internal structure leads to lower porosity, and a higher viscosity leads to more significant absorption loss. In other words,ηa is proportional to the medium density ρ, porosity φ, and thickness ψ but inversely proportional to the penetration ξ [15].In the space domain, we observe the loss changes in energyE with increasing distance r. We select the longitudinal wave as the propagating wave, and ΔE is the energy change in the wavelength range λp. λp is determined by the circular frequency ω and velocity υp in the equation λp=2πvp/ω [16]. Thus,(4)ΔE=dEdrλp.In seismic exploration, we can also use the quality factorQ to study the attenuation of seismic waves, which represents the ratio of the total energy of the elastic wave to the energy loss in a period, which is defined as Q=2πE/ΔE [17, 18]. Besides, we set the inverse of Q as the specific attenuation ηa, and ηa is proportional to the medium density ρ, porosity φ, and viscosity ψ but inversely proportional to the penetration ξ [18, 19]. Thus, we define(5)Q=2πEΔE=kρξψφ3,where k is a constant. By collating the equation, we obtain(6)dEdr=ωvpQE.Solving equation (6), we obtain(7)Er=E0eωr/vpQ.The propagation velocity of longitudinal waves in the medium isυp=λ+2μ/ρ, where λ and μ are Lame coefficients and ρ is the medium density. Thus,(8)ηa=ωvpQ=2πfvpQ=2πfkρvpξ/φϕ3=k1fρvpξ/φϕ3.Equation (8) represents the absorption loss coefficient of an elastic wave in the coal measure strata, where k1 is a constant.


### 2.2. Scattering Loss

Elastic waves scattering loss occurs when the elastic wave propagates through an inhomogeneous medium [20]. A heterogeneous medium granule with many small interfaces has an uncertain impedance. When an elastic wave propagates through the medium, a portion of the stream will change the path. Along the main direction, the energy of the elastic wave becomes weak; this process is called scattering loss. The method of scattering loss is highly complex because it is related to not only the properties and state of the medium but also the shape, size, and number of solid particles of the medium [21]. In theory, a rough approximation is generally made; that is, nonuniform particles are treated as entirely rigid spherical objects with a radius R. If the unit volume contains n scattering particles, we can see that the scattering cross section of a single target of the Rayleigh region is given by the following formula [22]:(9)ηs=4πk4V2F2n,where V represents the volume of the goal, F represents the shape coefficient of the goal, and F of the simple geometry can be obtained by looking up the table. Refer to [23, 24]. The scattering loss coefficient ηS is(10)ηs=29πk14R6n,where K1 is the elastic wave number of a 2π-long unit. The number of particles in the unit volume is n. Substituting K1=2π/λ and λ=υp/f into (10), we obtain(11)ηs=329π5R6f4υp4n.Because the propagation velocity of the longitudinal wave in the medium isυp=λ+2μ/ρ, equation (11) will change to(12)ηs=32π59R6f4λ+2μ/ρ2=k2R6f4λ+2μ/ρ2.In equation (12), which describes the elastic wave scattering loss coefficient in the coal-bearing strata, K2 is a constant. The formula indicates that the scattering loss coefficient ηS is related to the density of the particles of the medium, the radius R of the particles, and the frequency f of the elastic wave.


### 2.3. Total Loss Coefficient

The frequency migration loss is minimal in the majority of the medium. And it cannot be easily estimated. Therefore, the total loss coefficient of the elastic wave in the coal measure strata can be derived as(13)η=ηa+ηs+ηm≈k1fλ+2μ/ρξ/ψφ3+k2R6f4λ+2μ/ρ2.


## 2.1. Absorption

The existing research has shown that absorption loss has the following several influencing factors:(i)
Elastic wave frequency. A higher frequency leads to more significant damage, and vice versa. The elastic waves propagate in the medium and convert mechanical energy into heat energy. A higher rate results in a smaller wavelength, and a lower proportion of medium-sized particles makes it easier to transmit mechanical power to the medium; i.e., ηa is positively related to the frequency.(ii)
All physical properties of the coal measure strata medium, such as lithology of coal measure strata, elasticity, density, porosity, and viscosity, affect absorption. Flexibility is associated with lower absorption loss. A more compact internal structure leads to lower porosity, and a higher viscosity leads to more significant absorption loss. In other words,ηa is proportional to the medium density ρ, porosity φ, and thickness ψ but inversely proportional to the penetration ξ [15].In the space domain, we observe the loss changes in energyE with increasing distance r. We select the longitudinal wave as the propagating wave, and ΔE is the energy change in the wavelength range λp. λp is determined by the circular frequency ω and velocity υp in the equation λp=2πvp/ω [16]. Thus,(4)ΔE=dEdrλp.In seismic exploration, we can also use the quality factorQ to study the attenuation of seismic waves, which represents the ratio of the total energy of the elastic wave to the energy loss in a period, which is defined as Q=2πE/ΔE [17, 18]. Besides, we set the inverse of Q as the specific attenuation ηa, and ηa is proportional to the medium density ρ, porosity φ, and viscosity ψ but inversely proportional to the penetration ξ [18, 19]. Thus, we define(5)Q=2πEΔE=kρξψφ3,where k is a constant. By collating the equation, we obtain(6)dEdr=ωvpQE.Solving equation (6), we obtain(7)Er=E0eωr/vpQ.The propagation velocity of longitudinal waves in the medium isυp=λ+2μ/ρ, where λ and μ are Lame coefficients and ρ is the medium density. Thus,(8)ηa=ωvpQ=2πfvpQ=2πfkρvpξ/φϕ3=k1fρvpξ/φϕ3.Equation (8) represents the absorption loss coefficient of an elastic wave in the coal measure strata, where k1 is a constant.


## 2.2. Scattering Loss

Elastic waves scattering loss occurs when the elastic wave propagates through an inhomogeneous medium [20]. A heterogeneous medium granule with many small interfaces has an uncertain impedance. When an elastic wave propagates through the medium, a portion of the stream will change the path. Along the main direction, the energy of the elastic wave becomes weak; this process is called scattering loss. The method of scattering loss is highly complex because it is related to not only the properties and state of the medium but also the shape, size, and number of solid particles of the medium [21]. In theory, a rough approximation is generally made; that is, nonuniform particles are treated as entirely rigid spherical objects with a radius R. If the unit volume contains n scattering particles, we can see that the scattering cross section of a single target of the Rayleigh region is given by the following formula [22]:(9)ηs=4πk4V2F2n,where V represents the volume of the goal, F represents the shape coefficient of the goal, and F of the simple geometry can be obtained by looking up the table. Refer to [23, 24]. The scattering loss coefficient ηS is(10)ηs=29πk14R6n,where K1 is the elastic wave number of a 2π-long unit. The number of particles in the unit volume is n. Substituting K1=2π/λ and λ=υp/f into (10), we obtain(11)ηs=329π5R6f4υp4n.Because the propagation velocity of the longitudinal wave in the medium isυp=λ+2μ/ρ, equation (11) will change to(12)ηs=32π59R6f4λ+2μ/ρ2=k2R6f4λ+2μ/ρ2.In equation (12), which describes the elastic wave scattering loss coefficient in the coal-bearing strata, K2 is a constant. The formula indicates that the scattering loss coefficient ηS is related to the density of the particles of the medium, the radius R of the particles, and the frequency f of the elastic wave.


## 2.3. Total Loss Coefficient

The frequency migration loss is minimal in the majority of the medium. And it cannot be easily estimated. Therefore, the total loss coefficient of the elastic wave in the coal measure strata can be derived as(13)η=ηa+ηs+ηm≈k1fλ+2μ/ρξ/ψφ3+k2R6f4λ+2μ/ρ2.


## 3. Model Establishment

China’s coalfields are widely distributed and have abundant reserves. Still, but both the coal-bearing rock series (called coal-bearing strata) in China and other countries in the world are composed of coal beds and a set of sedimentary rocks. Coal-bearing levels have a layered structure [25], and the density of coal-bearing levels is less than the thickness of surrounding cliffs. The velocity of elastic waves of coal-bearing degrees is lower than that of surrounding rocks [26].The EDA (Extensively Dilatancy Anisotropy) medium model is a physical expression that is apt to the medium containing cracks (slots). Therefore, the paper considered the anisotropy of the coal seam medium. The coal seam is equivalent to the EDA medium [27]. The model of the coal-bearing stratum is shown in Figure 1. The medium parameters are shown in Table 1. It is 2000 m/s, the shear wave velocity is 1000 m/s, the density is 1.3 g/cm3, and the coal seam thickness is 4 m. The upper and lower layers are surrounding rocks, which are isotropic media. The P-wave velocity is 4000 m/s, the S-wave speed is 2000 m/s, the density is 2.6 g/cm3, and the thickness is 10 m.Figure 1
Coal measure strata medium model.Table 1
Parameter of the coal stratigraphic media model.
Parameter
Surrounding rock 1
Coal seam
Surrounding rock 2
v
p (m/s)
4000
2000
4000
v
s (m/s)
2000
1000
2000
ρ (g/cm3)
2.6
1.3
2.6
H (m)
10
4
10


## 4. Results and Discussion

### 4.1. Loss Model Simulation

COMSOL is based on a finite element algorithm implemented in field simulation software [14].It has been proven that the model embedded in COMSOL is practical in the transmission attenuation of an elastic wave. We select MATLAB as the simulation platform for simulating the loss formula model proposed above. We also chose the simulation results of the COMSOL model as the comparison standard. By comparing and analyzing two simulation results of COMSOL and MATLAB, the effectiveness of the proposed model is evaluated.From equations (3) and (13), we obtain(14)Er≈Kek1fλ+2μ/ρξ/ψφ3+k2R6f4λ+2μ/ρ2r+k0r.Equation (14) is the model simulated by MATLAB. The numerical method is to analyze and solve problems by transforming multiple influencing factors of various single-factor questions. We set independent ρ, ξ, φ, and f and dependent variables Er in MATLAB. Assume that other influencing factors are constant and change only one of them at a time to study the effect of this modified factor of the characteristics of multi-subchannels in coal-bearing strata. The simulation results are shown in Figures 2–5.Figure 2
Comparison of loss curves in MATLAB and COMSOL simulations under different frequency effects.Figure 3
Comparison of loss curves in MATLAB and COMSOL simulations under different density effects.Figure 4
Comparison of loss curves in MATLAB and COMSOL simulations with different particle sizes.Figure 5
Comparison of loss curves in MATLAB and COMSOL simulations with different porosities.In the COMSOL software, as in MATLAB, the two layers of rock are selected as the top and bottom of the coal seam, and the middle layer is the coal seam. Assume upper and lower surrounding rocks are isotropic media, the simulation length is 200 m, the width of the surrounding rock is 5 m, the thickness of the coal seam is 2 m, and the grid is used to customize the quadrilateral element. The size parameter is the maximum cell size 0.001, the smallest unit size is 0.001 m, the maximum cell growth rate is 1.3, and the curvature factor is 0.3. In the coordinate (0, 0), we added the Ricker as the source. Ricker is a kind of seismic wavelet, which is widely used in seismic exploration research [28, 29]. Formula (15) is the expression of the Ricker, where f is the frequency, and the waveform is shown in Figure 6:(15)ft=1−2πft2e−πft2.Figure 6
Ricker waveform.Near the focal areas and away from the elastic source, three probes are added at distances of 30, 50, and 70 m. The received waveform by the probes is shown in Figure7. We can see that the waveform has different degrees of attenuation at 30, 50, and 70 meters. The longer the distance, the smaller the amplitude, and the more significant the attenuation.Figure 7
The received waveforms by the probes at distances of (a) 30°m, (b) 50°m, and (c) 70°m.
(a)
(b)
(c)


### 4.2. Effect of Frequency on Loss

The relationship between the loss and rate for a medium density ofρ=1.4°g/cm3, a particle size of R=0.014cm, the porosity of φ=0.25, and a frequency range of 0.01–100 Hz is shown in Figure 2.Figure2 illustrates that the two simulation results to exhibit the same variation tendency towards the relationship between loss and frequency. Still, the loss of our model is less than that of COMSOL. At rates of 0–60 Hz, the loss has a weak dependence on frequency, and at frequencies above 60 Hz, the energy loss increases rapidly with increasing frequency. In other words, 60 Hz is a fundamental frequency in the elastic wave propagation simulation.


### 4.3. Effect of Density on Loss

We select 60 Hz as the simulation frequency,R=0.014cm as the particle size, and φ=0.25 as the porosity. Different coal seam densities are chosen to evaluate the model, with values in the range of 1.1–1.9 g/cm3. The simulation results of the relationship between the loss and coal density are shown in Figure 3.Figure3 illustrates that the loss increases gradually with increase in the density of the coal seam, and the maximum value of the loss exceeds 50 dB. The increase in loss is relatively smooth, with increase in the mass of the medium; the relationship can be approximated as linear to a frequency of 60 Hz. The simulation result is similar to that obtained with COMSOL, but our simulation curve is smoother.


### 4.4. Effect of Particle Size on Loss

The relationship between loss and particle size for a medium density ofρ=1.4 g/cm3, a frequency of 60 Hz, a porosity of φ=0.25, and particle size ranging from 0.008 to 0.02 cm is shown in Figure 4.Figure4 illustrates that the loss increases gradually with increasing particle size. When the particles are more massive than 0.014 cm, the loss changes more rapidly, with a maximum loss value of 55 dB; thus, the particle size influences the amount of loss, and our model simulates a smaller loss than COMSOL because of the particle size.


### 4.5. Effect of Porosity on Loss

We simulated the relationship between the loss and porosity for a medium density ofρ=1.4 g/cm3, a frequency of 60 Hz, a particle size of R=0.014cm, and a porosity ranging from 0.05 to 0.45.As is shown in Figure5, the elastic wave loss and porosity are positively correlated, and the loss rises with the increase in porosity. The loss increases relatively slowly when the porosity changes from 0.05 to 0.25, whereas the loss rises rapidly when the porosity is higher than 0.25. The maximum loss is approximately 80 dB.Figures2–5 illustrate that the simulation curves obtained with our model have the same change tendency as those obtained with COMSOL. The model embedded in COMSOL includes more inference factors that affect wave energy loss. Thus, the loss value obtained with COMSOL is slightly higher, and the loss curve is not as smooth because the propagation of the wave in real coal measure strata is highly complex.


## 4.1. Loss Model Simulation

COMSOL is based on a finite element algorithm implemented in field simulation software [14].It has been proven that the model embedded in COMSOL is practical in the transmission attenuation of an elastic wave. We select MATLAB as the simulation platform for simulating the loss formula model proposed above. We also chose the simulation results of the COMSOL model as the comparison standard. By comparing and analyzing two simulation results of COMSOL and MATLAB, the effectiveness of the proposed model is evaluated.From equations (3) and (13), we obtain(14)Er≈Kek1fλ+2μ/ρξ/ψφ3+k2R6f4λ+2μ/ρ2r+k0r.Equation (14) is the model simulated by MATLAB. The numerical method is to analyze and solve problems by transforming multiple influencing factors of various single-factor questions. We set independent ρ, ξ, φ, and f and dependent variables Er in MATLAB. Assume that other influencing factors are constant and change only one of them at a time to study the effect of this modified factor of the characteristics of multi-subchannels in coal-bearing strata. The simulation results are shown in Figures 2–5.Figure 2
Comparison of loss curves in MATLAB and COMSOL simulations under different frequency effects.Figure 3
Comparison of loss curves in MATLAB and COMSOL simulations under different density effects.Figure 4
Comparison of loss curves in MATLAB and COMSOL simulations with different particle sizes.Figure 5
Comparison of loss curves in MATLAB and COMSOL simulations with different porosities.In the COMSOL software, as in MATLAB, the two layers of rock are selected as the top and bottom of the coal seam, and the middle layer is the coal seam. Assume upper and lower surrounding rocks are isotropic media, the simulation length is 200 m, the width of the surrounding rock is 5 m, the thickness of the coal seam is 2 m, and the grid is used to customize the quadrilateral element. The size parameter is the maximum cell size 0.001, the smallest unit size is 0.001 m, the maximum cell growth rate is 1.3, and the curvature factor is 0.3. In the coordinate (0, 0), we added the Ricker as the source. Ricker is a kind of seismic wavelet, which is widely used in seismic exploration research [28, 29]. Formula (15) is the expression of the Ricker, where f is the frequency, and the waveform is shown in Figure 6:(15)ft=1−2πft2e−πft2.Figure 6
Ricker waveform.Near the focal areas and away from the elastic source, three probes are added at distances of 30, 50, and 70 m. The received waveform by the probes is shown in Figure7. We can see that the waveform has different degrees of attenuation at 30, 50, and 70 meters. The longer the distance, the smaller the amplitude, and the more significant the attenuation.Figure 7
The received waveforms by the probes at distances of (a) 30°m, (b) 50°m, and (c) 70°m.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 4.2. Effect of Frequency on Loss

The relationship between the loss and rate for a medium density ofρ=1.4°g/cm3, a particle size of R=0.014cm, the porosity of φ=0.25, and a frequency range of 0.01–100 Hz is shown in Figure 2.Figure2 illustrates that the two simulation results to exhibit the same variation tendency towards the relationship between loss and frequency. Still, the loss of our model is less than that of COMSOL. At rates of 0–60 Hz, the loss has a weak dependence on frequency, and at frequencies above 60 Hz, the energy loss increases rapidly with increasing frequency. In other words, 60 Hz is a fundamental frequency in the elastic wave propagation simulation.


## 4.3. Effect of Density on Loss

We select 60 Hz as the simulation frequency,R=0.014cm as the particle size, and φ=0.25 as the porosity. Different coal seam densities are chosen to evaluate the model, with values in the range of 1.1–1.9 g/cm3. The simulation results of the relationship between the loss and coal density are shown in Figure 3.Figure3 illustrates that the loss increases gradually with increase in the density of the coal seam, and the maximum value of the loss exceeds 50 dB. The increase in loss is relatively smooth, with increase in the mass of the medium; the relationship can be approximated as linear to a frequency of 60 Hz. The simulation result is similar to that obtained with COMSOL, but our simulation curve is smoother.


## 4.4. Effect of Particle Size on Loss

The relationship between loss and particle size for a medium density ofρ=1.4 g/cm3, a frequency of 60 Hz, a porosity of φ=0.25, and particle size ranging from 0.008 to 0.02 cm is shown in Figure 4.Figure4 illustrates that the loss increases gradually with increasing particle size. When the particles are more massive than 0.014 cm, the loss changes more rapidly, with a maximum loss value of 55 dB; thus, the particle size influences the amount of loss, and our model simulates a smaller loss than COMSOL because of the particle size.


## 4.5. Effect of Porosity on Loss

We simulated the relationship between the loss and porosity for a medium density ofρ=1.4 g/cm3, a frequency of 60 Hz, a particle size of R=0.014cm, and a porosity ranging from 0.05 to 0.45.As is shown in Figure5, the elastic wave loss and porosity are positively correlated, and the loss rises with the increase in porosity. The loss increases relatively slowly when the porosity changes from 0.05 to 0.25, whereas the loss rises rapidly when the porosity is higher than 0.25. The maximum loss is approximately 80 dB.Figures2–5 illustrate that the simulation curves obtained with our model have the same change tendency as those obtained with COMSOL. The model embedded in COMSOL includes more inference factors that affect wave energy loss. Thus, the loss value obtained with COMSOL is slightly higher, and the loss curve is not as smooth because the propagation of the wave in real coal measure strata is highly complex.


## 5. Conclusions

Because it is challenging to simulate various forms of coal seams, the elastic wave energy loss formula model proposed to this paper is only an approximate value. However, when only one loss factor is considered, the proposed model improves the existing model. A comparison of the simulation results from MATLAB and COMSOL demonstrated that our model provides results that are highly similar to the results obtained with COMSOL; however, some differences existed. The following conclusions are drawn from this study:(1)
Although the proposed model only considered two principal loss coefficients, the simulation result is nearly identical to that obtained with COMSOL, with simulation errors of less than 3 dB between the two models. The energy losses in the COMSOL result are always higher because the COMSOL models include more energy loss factors. The model proposed in this paper is valid based on the comparison of COMSOL.(2)
Considering various types of media in coal measure strata, the loss of an elastic wave increases with the increase in frequency, density, particle size, or porosity. The loss curve has an inflection point when the frequency is 60 Hz, the porosity is 0.25, and the rate of loss increases rapidly when the frequency is greater than 60 Hz, or the porosity is higher than 0.25.(3)
In nature, many factors influence the loss characteristics of an elastic wave in coal measure strata because the coal-bearing strata of the internal structure are highly complex. The surrounding rock pressure and confining pressure, the coal seam thickness, and the mineral component of the medium all affect the loss characteristics of an elastic wave; however, the formula model proposed in this paper only includes the effects of the frequency, density, particle size, and porosity. As a result, this model has several limitations.Also, the model is not comprehensive in practical applications. Although more research work is required to improve the model, it is still beneficial for analyzing the propagation energy loss of a low-frequency elastic wave according to a single influence factor. The COMSOL software simulation indicated that the grid division and step size selection would affect the accuracy of the calculation results; however, the accuracy is adequate for evaluating the model. Further research on the model will focus on in situ measurements and additional factors influencing the propagation energy loss.



---

*Source: 6832362-2020-03-09.xml*