# Evaluating RLWT Rutting Test of Asphalt Mixtures Based on Industrial Computerized Tomography

Authors: Wenliang Wu; Zhi Li; Xiaoning Zhang; Minghui Li
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

To eliminate the effects of image’s light and shade difference when separating and distinguishing the material composition, a method is put forward, namely, ring-type and partitions threshold segmentation. It means setting up different segment threshold for different areas of the same image and then combining these different areas into one image. Furthermore, by analyzing the CT image before and after the RLWT rutting test for the drilling specimen and Marshall specimen and taking the volume of air voids and the angle (alpha) between max main axis andX axis, the differences of two kinds of specimens’ macrotest results were discussed from internal structure distribution. Here, we show that there are differences between macrotest results of two kinds of specimens because of internal air voids and aggregate distribution, which should be considered for compliance testing.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

With the increasing traffic volume and the effects of heavy-duty axle loading, pavement rutting has become one of major distresses occurring in asphalt pavements. It can influence the safety and the driving comfort directly when the rutting depth reaches a certain limit [1]. A variety of methods, such as French Pavement Rutting Tester (PRT), Hamburg Wheel-Tracking Device (WTD), Asphalt Pavement Analyzer (APA), and Rotary Loaded Wheel Tester (RLWT), have been used for estimating the rutting performance of the asphalt concrete pavement in the world. The Rotary Loaded Wheel Tester, developed in the US in the late 1990s, has been paid more and more attention because of its convenience and ease of use. It can evaluate the rutting performance by measuring the mixture sample and pavement coring specimens whose diameter is 100 mm or 150 mm. The further study on quality control conformance testing about applying RLWT to asphalt pavement has begun [2, 3].As a unique nondestructive evaluation technique, industrial computerized tomography (CT) can inspect the reaction of material interior structures dynamically and quantificationally and provide a new method to researching interior structures. The computer-aided design of asphalt mixtures based on industrial CT, a prospective technology, is predicted as “the next generation of infrastructure materials research” and “analysis modeling and design method based on system.” Masad used CT to research asphalt mixture very early, and he paid more attention to the volumetric properties, contact relationship, and numerical simulation [4, 5]. Wang et al. have done some research on 3D reconstruction technology and performed a large number of numerical simulation test based on 3D reconstruction technology [6, 7]. The author’s team researched the CT technology for asphalt mixture and made certain progress [8]. The main challenge of CT technology is that the brightness of CT image varies according to the distance with central axis because of the low ray power of industrial CT machine. And the CT image cannot give obvious peak, and this challenge leads to some problems in distinguishing different materials accurately.Based on the foregoing background, this paper developed a new method to segment threshold, namely, ring-type and partitions threshold segmentation. This means setting up different segment thresholds for different areas of the same image and then combining these different areas into one image. Furthermore, by analyzing the CT image before and after the RLWT rutting test for pavement core and indoor specimen and taking the volume of air voids and the angle alpha between max main axis andX axis, the differences of two kinds of specimens’ macrotest results were discussed from internal structure distribution.


## 2. Ring-Type and Partitions Threshold Segmentation

Threshold segmentation is one way to distinguish the voids, asphalt mastic, and aggregates through segmenting images, whose accuracy largely depend on the selection of threshold T1 and T2 [9]. Many researchers take the 2-mode method to analyze the images. This way can generate threshold by applying point correlation technique, assuming that the image between the two peaks is the same medium and preliminarily determining the threshold T1 and T2 and then ascertaining the T1 and T2 by trial and error. However, after carefully comparing the slice images of different positions scanned by CT, it can be found that the gray level information of each image is not consistent completely, and the gray value of the same kind of material scanned in different position is not same. The gray level information of single image cannot generally represent the whole sample distributing disciplinarian. In addition, from the original image scanned by CT (Figure 1), it can be found that the surrounding of the image is darker than that in the center. Figure 2 shows the image which is consisted by the gray value 189–255 of pixel points. And, it can be seen from Figure 2 that the aggregate around the image can be roughly distinguished, but the one in the center is not clear. The threshold segmentation uses gray value to distinguish the material. Therefore, it is very necessary to adjust image so that the same material can be in the same gray level. Ring-type and partitions threshold segmentation helps to solve this problem.Figure 1
Original image of CT scanning.Figure 2
Image of gray level from 189 to 245.In view of nonuniformity that the gray value of the same material in the CT image gradually increases from the center to the edge, the CT image is divided into different ring-type images. The specific steps are as follows: (1) dividing the whole image into a series of overlapping by 50% ring-type subimage (the center image is round.); (2) using Otsu’s method [10] for each subimage to calculate the gray threshold of the aggregate and the background; (3) finally, combining the sub-image processed in step 2.The following is an example about the application of the ring-type and partitions threshold segmentation when the number of the ring is five.(1)
The first step is dividing the whole image into five subimages and dealing with image uniformity processing separately. The result is shown in Figure3.(2)
Then establishing the gray histogram of each subimage (as is shown in Figure4). Table 1 shows gray value statistics of the subimage.Figure 3
Subimage after segmentation: (a) central disk, (b) second ring, (c) third ring, (d) fourth ring, and (e) fifth ring.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)Figure 4
Gray histogram of the subimage: (a) central disk, (b) second ring, (c) third ring, (d) fourth ring, and (e) fifth ring.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)Table 1
Statistical table of gray level.
Subimage
Statistical starting point
Statistical end point
Peak value
Average
Standard deviation
Central disk
158
233
211
202
6.86
Second ring
128
240
214
204
7.78
Third ring
121
244
217
206
9.26
Fourth ring
116
255
230
215
9.63
Fifth ring
114
255
236
218
10Finally, the appropriate image segmentation algorithm is selected (Otsu’s method is selected in this article), and each subimage is segmented. Then, the aggregate particles are isolated and the subimages are combined, which only contains aggregate particles. Figure5 shows the final aggregate image.Figure 5
Aggregate image after segmentation.This article has attempted other normal methods (fuzzy c-mean method, GMM-EM method, and otsu method) to analyze the CT image, as shown in Figures6–8. From Figures 5 and 8, it is shown that using ring-type and partitions threshold segmentation method is much better to extracting aggregates than segmenting the image directly. Furthermore, a normal method requires human interaction, and its efficiency is low with the specimen’s radius growing. Ring-type and partitions threshold segmentation is a method of variable threshold processing and can solve the problem of uneven background since low-energy X-ray.Figure 6
Fuzzy c-mean method.Figure 7
GMM-EM method.Figure 8
Otsu method.The ring-type and partitions threshold segmentation method is suitable for situation that the gray of the same material is changing gradually from the center to the edge in CT image. For poor quality images, the quality of image segmentation can be improved by appropriately increasing the number of rings.


## 3. RLWT Rutting Test

RLWT is a one direction device with no horizontal displacement, as shown in Figure9. Figure 10 shows the stress pattern of the specimen. There are ten small rubber wheels arranged at the edge of a big rotary wheel. When the shaft spins once, every rubber wheel will load the specimen once. In this test, a 125 Newton force and 0.7 MPa contact pressure is applied to the surface of the specimen through free-spinning rubber wheel. Most of the sample will be tested over 16,000 load application. Besides, it will test and record rut depth and the corresponding loading time automatically. And the maximum rut depth of the test is 6.35 mm, and the maximum loading number is 60,000.Figure 9
Loading sketch of RLWT.Figure 10
Stress pattern of specimen.


## 4. Summary and Discussion

Drilling three core samples is performed in the middle layer of AC-20 asphalt pavement. Table2 presents the gradation of AC-20 asphalt mixtures. Scanning the two kinds of the sample before and after the RLWT and processing the CT image.Table 2
Gradation of AC-20 asphalt mixtures.
Gradation (mm)
Percent passing
Asphalt-aggregate ratio (%)
26.5
19
16
13.2
9.5
4.75
2.36
1.18
0.6
0.3
0.15
0.075
AC-20
100
94.9
84.8
73.3
54.4
34.8
22.1
18.5
14.5
11.3
9.0
5.4
4.2


### 4.1. Void Ratio Distribution Characteristics

The specimen’s study area is chosen after scanning, eliminating the effect of external drop shadow, and determining the void segment threshold value T1 by trial method. The air void is assumed to be the part of the specimen, whose gray value between 0 and T1, as shown in Figure11. Furthermore, the air voids content can be measured by the image method through calculating the ratio of the volume of void against the total volume of the specimen. Table 3 presents the specimen’s air voids.Figure 11
3D image of air voids.Table 3
Statistical table of air void ratio.
Item
Drilling specimen
Marshall specimen
Image method
ThresholdT1
40
40
Air void content of upper 3 mm specimen (%)
5.50
4.09
Air void content (%)
3.7
3.0
Maximum air void content (%)
6.55
6.2
Minimum air void content (%)
2.5
1.6
Variable coefficient
0.33
0.28
Standard air void content (%) (submerged weight in water method)
4.71
3.53From Table2, it can be found that the range of void is very wide. And the air void contents of the in-place sample’s variability are much greater than those of the Marshall specimen. The air void content measured by the image method is less than the one measured by the standard method, and the latter is about 1.2 times of the former. The reason is that some small pores cannot be identified because of the relationship of the image quality and the program application adaptability. Another important reason is that the open pore is processed as part of background in the image processing. After analyzing upper 3 mm air void of the sample, it can be found that the upper air void of the in-place sample is 5.5%, but the sample shaped in laboratory is only 4.09%. The difference of the upper air void directly led to the sample’s performance difference. When the pavement compaction degree is low, also means the initial void is high, the aggregate particles cannot interlock very well with each other, and the contact point is unstable. Besides, the compaction rutting might occur under the dynamic loading because of lacking bearing capacity.


### 4.2. Aggregate Particles Distribution Characteristics

For the line connecting two points on the edge of aggregate particles, there is a unique longest line called particle’s main axis, and the main axis intersects the edge of the aggregate particles at the endpoints. The direction of the particle axis, represented by alpha (0 ≤ alpha ≤ 90°), is the angle between the particle axis and theX axis. The physical meaning of it is shown in Figure 12 [11].Figure 12
Particles’ orientation of main axis.According to the research of Chen and Liao [12], there is a good correlation between the direction of the particle axis and rutting resistance performance of mixture. Therefore, dividing the coarse aggregate into three types is based on the direction of particle axis: (1) the aggregate whose alpha is in 0°∼30° is regraded as stable aggregate because of low center of gravity, (2) the aggregate whose alpha is in 30°∼60° may become unstable because of higher center of gravity, and (3) the aggregate whose alpha is in 31°∼60° is unstable. It is easy for angle change to appear and lead to pavement rutting.While researching the distribution characteristics of aggregate particles, the CT image of the samples needs to be obtained first, followed by applying the ring-type and partitions threshold segmentation method (the CT image is shown in Figure13(a)). Finally, testing the specimens 16,000 times and scanning the specimens at the same location should be performed. The aggregate particles image is shown in Figure 13(b). Figure 14 shows the relation between deformation and loading times. The alpha is counted before and after the rutting test in these 9 images. And the statistical method is used to analyze the change of alpha before and after the rutting test. The result is shown in Table 4.Figure 13
(a) Aggregate particles before the rutting test; (b) aggregate particles after the rutting test.
(a)
(b)Figure 14
Relation between deformation and loading times.Table 4
Statistical table of alpha.
Specimen type
Aggregate size
The proportion of alpha (%)
Average angle (°)
0°∼30°
31°∼60°
61°∼90°
Drilling specimen before the rutting test
2.36∼4.75 mm
46
34
20
35.83
4.75∼9.5 mm
69
16
15
29.60
9.5∼20 mm
62
19
19
27.08
Drilling specimen after the rutting test
2.36∼4.75 mm
51
30
19
37.79
4.75∼9.5 mm
66
24
10
28.86
9.5∼20 mm
67
22
11
25.00
Marshall specimen before the rutting test
2.36∼4.75 mm
44
28
28
39.87
4.75∼9.5 mm
54
29
17
39.59
9.5∼20 mm
47
30
23
43.98
Marshall specimen after the rutting test
2.36∼4.75 mm
47
26
27
40.61
4.75∼9.5 mm
41
34
25
38.92
9.5∼20 mm
33
50
17
40.01It can be found from Figure11 that the deformation of the drilling specimen is significantly larger than laboratory Marshall specimen deformation. This is mainly due to the impact of the rolling method and construction factors. And it causes the larger air void contents of the drilling specimen, especially in the upper specimen. Therefore, drilling the core sample easily causes compactness rutting because of its higher porosity.From Table4, it can be found that the specimen is not only vertically compressed, but also affected by the shear stress because the base of rotary loaded wheel tester is suspended. And the shear effort is obvious, especially when the specimen is thin. The average alpha value of the drilling specimen and the laboratory Marshall specimen is 31°∼60°. It indicates that both of the specimens under different shaping methods might convert from an unstable condition into stable condition. From the variance of alpha value before and after the rutting test, it can be found that the alpha of aggregate decreases gradually after the rutting test. The particle proportion of alpha in 61°∼90° decrease significantly, while the one in 31°∼60° increases evidently, and it changes a little in 0°∼30° range. In other words, the specimen obtains higher stability after being tested by RLWT.The variation of aggregate particles’ alpha mainly occurred in the coarse aggregate (the size over 4.75 mm), especially the part of large particle (over 9.5 mm). But the alpha of fine aggregate particle changes insignificantly compared with the change of coarse aggregate particles. The change of large particles are mainly due to the conversion of 61°∼90° aggregate particles into 31°∼60° aggregate particles. The average alpha value of 2.36∼4.75 mm aggregate particles increases after being tested by RLWT, while the average alpha value of coarse aggregate particles decreases.Comparing the 0°∼30° aggregate particles’ proportion between the drilling specimen and the Marshall specimen in 0°∼30° range, it can be found that the value of the drilling specimen is larger. Which means conversion ratio of the drilling specimen from unstable condition to stable condition is relatively small. When compared with the 31°∼90° of large particle proportion, the proportion of the Marshall specimen is larger. In other words, the Marshall specimen has higher possibility of converting into an unstable condition. It also means that the large particle of the Marshall specimen has larger rotation under loading. Comparing the 0°∼30° aggregate particles’ proportion between the drilling specimen and the Marshall specimen in 0°∼30° range, it can be found that the value of the drilling specimen is larger. Which means conversion ratio of the drilling specimen from the unstable condition to stable condition is relatively small. When compared with the 31°∼90° of large particle proportion, the proportion of the Marshall specimen is larger. In other words, the Marshall specimen has higher possibility of converting into the unstable condition. It also means that the large particle of the Marshall specimen has larger rotation under loading.


## 4.1. Void Ratio Distribution Characteristics

The specimen’s study area is chosen after scanning, eliminating the effect of external drop shadow, and determining the void segment threshold value T1 by trial method. The air void is assumed to be the part of the specimen, whose gray value between 0 and T1, as shown in Figure11. Furthermore, the air voids content can be measured by the image method through calculating the ratio of the volume of void against the total volume of the specimen. Table 3 presents the specimen’s air voids.Figure 11
3D image of air voids.Table 3
Statistical table of air void ratio.
Item
Drilling specimen
Marshall specimen
Image method
ThresholdT1
40
40
Air void content of upper 3 mm specimen (%)
5.50
4.09
Air void content (%)
3.7
3.0
Maximum air void content (%)
6.55
6.2
Minimum air void content (%)
2.5
1.6
Variable coefficient
0.33
0.28
Standard air void content (%) (submerged weight in water method)
4.71
3.53From Table2, it can be found that the range of void is very wide. And the air void contents of the in-place sample’s variability are much greater than those of the Marshall specimen. The air void content measured by the image method is less than the one measured by the standard method, and the latter is about 1.2 times of the former. The reason is that some small pores cannot be identified because of the relationship of the image quality and the program application adaptability. Another important reason is that the open pore is processed as part of background in the image processing. After analyzing upper 3 mm air void of the sample, it can be found that the upper air void of the in-place sample is 5.5%, but the sample shaped in laboratory is only 4.09%. The difference of the upper air void directly led to the sample’s performance difference. When the pavement compaction degree is low, also means the initial void is high, the aggregate particles cannot interlock very well with each other, and the contact point is unstable. Besides, the compaction rutting might occur under the dynamic loading because of lacking bearing capacity.


## 4.2. Aggregate Particles Distribution Characteristics

For the line connecting two points on the edge of aggregate particles, there is a unique longest line called particle’s main axis, and the main axis intersects the edge of the aggregate particles at the endpoints. The direction of the particle axis, represented by alpha (0 ≤ alpha ≤ 90°), is the angle between the particle axis and theX axis. The physical meaning of it is shown in Figure 12 [11].Figure 12
Particles’ orientation of main axis.According to the research of Chen and Liao [12], there is a good correlation between the direction of the particle axis and rutting resistance performance of mixture. Therefore, dividing the coarse aggregate into three types is based on the direction of particle axis: (1) the aggregate whose alpha is in 0°∼30° is regraded as stable aggregate because of low center of gravity, (2) the aggregate whose alpha is in 30°∼60° may become unstable because of higher center of gravity, and (3) the aggregate whose alpha is in 31°∼60° is unstable. It is easy for angle change to appear and lead to pavement rutting.While researching the distribution characteristics of aggregate particles, the CT image of the samples needs to be obtained first, followed by applying the ring-type and partitions threshold segmentation method (the CT image is shown in Figure13(a)). Finally, testing the specimens 16,000 times and scanning the specimens at the same location should be performed. The aggregate particles image is shown in Figure 13(b). Figure 14 shows the relation between deformation and loading times. The alpha is counted before and after the rutting test in these 9 images. And the statistical method is used to analyze the change of alpha before and after the rutting test. The result is shown in Table 4.Figure 13
(a) Aggregate particles before the rutting test; (b) aggregate particles after the rutting test.
(a)
(b)Figure 14
Relation between deformation and loading times.Table 4
Statistical table of alpha.
Specimen type
Aggregate size
The proportion of alpha (%)
Average angle (°)
0°∼30°
31°∼60°
61°∼90°
Drilling specimen before the rutting test
2.36∼4.75 mm
46
34
20
35.83
4.75∼9.5 mm
69
16
15
29.60
9.5∼20 mm
62
19
19
27.08
Drilling specimen after the rutting test
2.36∼4.75 mm
51
30
19
37.79
4.75∼9.5 mm
66
24
10
28.86
9.5∼20 mm
67
22
11
25.00
Marshall specimen before the rutting test
2.36∼4.75 mm
44
28
28
39.87
4.75∼9.5 mm
54
29
17
39.59
9.5∼20 mm
47
30
23
43.98
Marshall specimen after the rutting test
2.36∼4.75 mm
47
26
27
40.61
4.75∼9.5 mm
41
34
25
38.92
9.5∼20 mm
33
50
17
40.01It can be found from Figure11 that the deformation of the drilling specimen is significantly larger than laboratory Marshall specimen deformation. This is mainly due to the impact of the rolling method and construction factors. And it causes the larger air void contents of the drilling specimen, especially in the upper specimen. Therefore, drilling the core sample easily causes compactness rutting because of its higher porosity.From Table4, it can be found that the specimen is not only vertically compressed, but also affected by the shear stress because the base of rotary loaded wheel tester is suspended. And the shear effort is obvious, especially when the specimen is thin. The average alpha value of the drilling specimen and the laboratory Marshall specimen is 31°∼60°. It indicates that both of the specimens under different shaping methods might convert from an unstable condition into stable condition. From the variance of alpha value before and after the rutting test, it can be found that the alpha of aggregate decreases gradually after the rutting test. The particle proportion of alpha in 61°∼90° decrease significantly, while the one in 31°∼60° increases evidently, and it changes a little in 0°∼30° range. In other words, the specimen obtains higher stability after being tested by RLWT.The variation of aggregate particles’ alpha mainly occurred in the coarse aggregate (the size over 4.75 mm), especially the part of large particle (over 9.5 mm). But the alpha of fine aggregate particle changes insignificantly compared with the change of coarse aggregate particles. The change of large particles are mainly due to the conversion of 61°∼90° aggregate particles into 31°∼60° aggregate particles. The average alpha value of 2.36∼4.75 mm aggregate particles increases after being tested by RLWT, while the average alpha value of coarse aggregate particles decreases.Comparing the 0°∼30° aggregate particles’ proportion between the drilling specimen and the Marshall specimen in 0°∼30° range, it can be found that the value of the drilling specimen is larger. Which means conversion ratio of the drilling specimen from unstable condition to stable condition is relatively small. When compared with the 31°∼90° of large particle proportion, the proportion of the Marshall specimen is larger. In other words, the Marshall specimen has higher possibility of converting into an unstable condition. It also means that the large particle of the Marshall specimen has larger rotation under loading. Comparing the 0°∼30° aggregate particles’ proportion between the drilling specimen and the Marshall specimen in 0°∼30° range, it can be found that the value of the drilling specimen is larger. Which means conversion ratio of the drilling specimen from the unstable condition to stable condition is relatively small. When compared with the 31°∼90° of large particle proportion, the proportion of the Marshall specimen is larger. In other words, the Marshall specimen has higher possibility of converting into the unstable condition. It also means that the large particle of the Marshall specimen has larger rotation under loading.


## 5. Conclusions

(1)
In view of the situation that the gray of the same material changes gradually from the center to the edge in CT image, applying ring-type and partitions threshold segmentation method is better for the result and more accurate for particles extraction when compared with segmenting the whole image directly.
(2)
The air void variability of the drilling core is higher than that of the Marshall specimen. The air void value measured by the image method is less than the one measured by the standard method. And the later is about 1.2 times of the former. The air void of drilling core within the 3 mm upper specimen is far more than that of the Marshall specimen. The difference of upper air void will make the difference of the specimen performance directly.
(3)
After RLWT rutting test, it can be found that the alpha value of the drilling specimen and the Marshall specimen decreases, and the specimens convert from unstable condition into stable condition. But the change of each shift aggregate is different. What is more, the alpha change of the two kinds of specimens is different because of the shaping method.
(4)
The two kinds of specimens, whose volumetric properties and mix proportions are same, have different internal material (void and aggregate particle) distribution, macroscopic volume parameters, and mechanics indexes because of the different shaping method. It should be paid more attention when we do compliance test of construction quality.



---

*Source: 6827064-2018-06-24.xml*