# New Urea and Thiourea Derivatives of Piperazine Doped with Febuxostat: Synthesis and Evaluation of Anti-TMV and Antimicrobial Activities

Authors: Reddivari Chenna Krishna Reddy; Syed Rasheed; Devineni Subba Rao; Shaik Adam; Yellala Venkata Rami Reddy; Chamarthi Naga Raju
Journal: The Scientific World Journal
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

A series of new 4-(5-(3-cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-2-carbonyl)-N-(substituted phenyl)piperazine-1-carboxamides8(a–e)/carbothioamides 8(f–j) were accomplished for biological interest by the simple addition of active functionalized arylisocyanates 7(a–e)/arylisothiocyanates 7(f–j) with 2-isobutoxy-5-(4-methyl-2-(piperazine-1-carbonyl)thiazol-5-yl)benzonitrile (4). Compound 4 was synthesized in high yields (94%) by the condensation reaction of febuxostat (1) with piperazine using a selective reagent such as propylphosphonic anhydride (T3P). Antiviral activity against Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) and antimicrobial activity of the synthesized compounds were evaluated. Biological data revealed that 4-nitrophenyl substituted urea 8d, and 3-bromophenyl substituted thiourea 8f exhibited promising antiviral activities. Moreover, 4-fluorophenyl substituted urea 8a, 4-nitrophenyl substituted urea 8d, 3-bromophenyl substituted thiourea 8f, and 2,4-dichlorophenyl substituted thiourea 8j exhibited potent antimicrobial activity.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Xanthine oxidase (XO) is an enzyme that catalyzes the oxidation of hypoxanthine to xanthine and can further catalyze the oxidation of xanthine to uric acid [1]. The literature studies revealed that an increase in mean serum urate in both genders during the past four decades [2–4] and the underlying cause of gout is hyperuricemia. In human, the substance which acts as inhibitor of xanthine oxidase reduces the production of uric acid and several medications that inhibit xanthine oxidase are indicated for treatment of hyperuricemia and related medical conditions including gout [5]. Two types of XO inhibitors are in use: purine analogues, such as allopurinol (1) and oxypurinol (2), have long been employed in main therapy for the treatment of chronic gout in many countries, and nonpurine analogues, such as febuxostat (3) (Figure 1). Febuxostat (Adenuric ▼), 2-[3-cyano-4-(2-methylpropoxy)phenyl]-4-methylthiazole-5-carboxylic acid is a nonpurine selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase (XO) used for the treatment of hyperuricemia and gout and was approved in the USA. It is not expected to inhibit other enzymes involved in purine, pyrimidine synthesis, and metabolism at therapeutic concentrations [6–8].Figure 1
Some biologically active molecules.Furthermore, it is well known that a number of nitrogen containing heterocyclic compounds exhibited a wide variety of biological activities. Among them, piperazine derivatives have owed their importance in many medicinal molecules. Piperazine derivatives were originally used in veterinary medicines which combat parasitic infections in poultry, stimulants at low doses, and hallucinations at higher level doses [9]. In addition to the nitrogen functionalities such as urea and thiourea which have been found in broad spectrum of biological activities like antidiabetic [10], anti-inflammatory [11], antiviral [12], antibacterial, antifungal, herbicidal [13, 14], antituberculosis [15–18], and antidepressant activity on central nervous system [19] as well as purification agents for the effluent of organic and inorganic molecules in industrial, agricultural, and mining industries [20]. Recently, some of urea-based compounds act as kinase inhibitors and as novel therapeutics in cancer treatment [21] due to their unique binding mode and kinase inhibition profile. Having more importance in pharmacological applications of urea and thiourea derivatives, there is a possibility to design more efficient urea and thiourea derivatives as antiviral and antimicrobial agents.Based on the importance of urea and thiourea and piperazine derivatives and in the part of our research programme, we designed and synthesized a series of novel 5-(3-cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-2-carbonyl)-N-(substituted phenyl)piperazine-1-carboxamide/carbothiomide derivatives with a hope to obtain good results in the screening biological studies againstTobacco mosaic virus and antimicrobial pathogens (bacterial and fungal strains).


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Chemistry

All chemicals and reagents used for the synthesis were commercially available, and AR grade solvents/reagents were used as such were received from Sigma-Aldrich and Merck. All solvents used for spectroscopic and other physical studies were reagent grade and were further purified by the literature methods [22]. All melting points (m.p) were obtained with a digital Guna melting point apparatus and are uncorrected. IR spectra were recorded on a Perkin Elmer 283 unit using KBr discs. 1H/13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker 400 MHz NMR spectrometer operating at 400 MHz for 1H and 100.25 MHz for 13C in DMSO-d6 solvent and TMS was used as internal standard. Chemical shift values (δ) and coupling constants (J) are reported in ppm and Hz, respectively. Standard abbreviations indicating multiplicity are used as follows: “s” for singlet, “d” for doublet, “dd” for doublet of doublets, “t” for triplet, “q” for quartet, “m” for multiplet, and “br” for broad. LC-MS spectra were recorded on a Jeol SX 102 DA/600 Mass spectrometer. Elemental analyses were performed on a Thermo Finnigan Instrument at the University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India. Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was carried out on precoated plates and spots were visualized with UV light.


#### 2.1.1. Synthetic Procedure for the Synthesis of 2-Isobutoxy-5-(4-methyl-2-(piperazine-1-carbonyl)thiazol-5-yl)benzonitrile (4)

Febuxostat (3) (2.97 g, 9.4 mmol) was dissolved in 50 mL of dry dichloromethane (DCM) in a flask and base and diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA) (2.5 mL, 14.0 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 20 min at room temperature to get homogeneous solution. The reagent, T3P (3.6 mL, 12.0 mmol) and piperazine (0.81 g, 9.4 mmol) were added to the reaction mixture with stirring. Then, the reaction mixture was stirred vigorously for 8 h at room temperature. After completion of the reaction as checked by TLC, the solid was filtered off and recrystallized from methanol to afford 2-isobutoxy-5-(4-methyl-2-(piperazine-1-carbonyl)thiazol-5-yl)benzonitrile (4) (3.54 g) (94%). Mol. Wt 384, mp 154–156°C. IR (KBr, υ cm−1): 3334 (–N–H, str), 3015 (=C–H, str), 2240 (–CN, str), 1654 (–C=O, str). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.92 (d, 6H, J=7.6 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.28–1.42 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.43 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.12 (t, 4H, J=6.8 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.28 (t, 4H, J=6.8 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.79 (d, 2H, J=7.6 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 6.98 (d, 1H, J=6.4 Hz, Ar-H), 7.21 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 7.64 (d, 1H, J=6.0 Hz, Ar-H). LC-MS (m/z, %): 383 (M-H+, 100).


#### 2.1.2. Typical Procedure for the Synthesis of Title Urea/Thiourea Derivatives8(a–j)

The synthesized intermediate, 2-isobutoxy-5-(4-methyl-2-(piperazine-1-carbonyl)thiazol-5-yl)benzonitrile (4) (250 mg, 0.65 mmol), 1-isocyanato-4-nitrobenzene (7d) (106.38 mg, 0.65 mmol) and N,N-dimethylpiperazine (0.13 mL, 0.98 mmol) were dissolved in 20 mL of THF in a flask and refluxed with vigorous stirring for 2.5 h. After completion of the reaction as indicated by TLC, the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure to get crude product 8d. The crude product was purified by column chromatography using 3 : 7 ratio of ethyl acetate and n-hexane as an eluent to get pure 4-(5-(3-cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-2-carbonyl)-N-(4-nitrophenyl)piperazine-1-carboxamide (8d) (321 mg, 90%). All the other title compounds were synthesized using the above experimental procedure.


#### 2.1.3. 4-[2-(3-Cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]-N-(4-fluorophenyl)piperazine-1-carboxamide (8a)

Light brown solid, Yield: 85%, mp 182–184°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3296 (–N–H, str), 3015 (=C–H, str), 2889 (–C–H, str), 2243 (–CN, str), 1676 (–C=O, str), 1638 (–C=O, str), 1167 (–C–F, str); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.94 (d, 6H, J=8.8 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.28–1.42 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.56 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.39 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.68 (t, 4H, J=6.8 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.85 (d, 2H, J=7.6 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 7.36–7.43 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.61 (d, 2H, J=6.4 Hz, Ar-H), 7.73–7.81 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 9.51 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 17.4 (C35), 18.9 (C33,34), 31.2 (C32), 48.6 (C16,20), 51.2 (C17,19), 73.1 (C31), 104.6 (C1), 113.9 (C25,27), 114.6 (C5), 118.2 (C11), 119.4 (C7), 120.1 (C24,28), 123.4 (C3), 126.2 (C2), 130.4 (C4), 136.6 (C23), 151.3 (C6), 154.8 (C10), 158.3 (C21), 162.2 (C13), 165.7 (C26), 166.2 (C8); LC-MS (m/z, %): 520 (M-H+, 100), 410  (M-H+ − 110, 30), 382 (M-H+ − 138, 73); Anal. Calcd. for C27H28FN5O3S:  C, 62.17; H, 5.41; N, 13.43. Found: C, 61.93; H, 5.34; N, 13.48%.


#### 2.1.4. N-(4-Bromophenyl)-4-[2-(3-cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (8b)

White solid, Yield: 81%, mp 163-165°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3312 (–N–H, str), 3018 (=C–H, str), 2885 (–C–H, str), 2235 (–CN, str), 1672 (–C=O, str), 1646 (–C=O, str), 748 (–C–Br, str); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.89 (d, 6H, J=7.6 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.21–1.33 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.51 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.34 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.51 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.74 (d, 2H, J=6.8 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 7.27 (d, 1H, J=6.8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.18 (d, 2H, J=6.4 Hz, Ar-H), 7.26–7.39 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 9.28 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 17.1 (C35), 17.9 (C33,34), 33.4 (C32), 49.8 (C16,20), 51.4 (C17,19), 72.8 (C31), 104.4 (C1), 113.6 (C25,27), 114.8 (C5), 117.5 (C11), 118.1 (C7), 121.4 (C24,28), 122.7 (C26), 124.5 (C3), 125.8 (C2), 128.7 (C4), 136.3 (C23), 152.6 (C6), 154.7 (C10), 157.2 (C21), 160.1 (C13), 164.7 (C8); LC-MS (m/z, %): 582 (M-H++2, 97), 580 (M-H+, 100), 410 (M-H+ − 170, 46).


#### 2.1.5. 4-[2-(3-Cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]-N-(2-nitrophenyl)piperazine-1-carboxamide (8c)

Brown powdered solid, Yield: 89%, mp 176–178°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3320 (–N–H, str), 3051 (=C–H, str), 2892 (–C–H, str), 2248 (–CN, str), 1674 (–C=O, str), 1640 (–C=O, str), 1546 (–NO2 (aromatic), asymstr); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.98 (d, 6H, J=7.2 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.24–1.31 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.73 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.55 (t, 4H, J=6.8 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.68 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.96 (d, 2H, J=7.6 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 7.35 (d, 1H, J=6.4 Hz, Ar-H), 7.64–7.79 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 8.18–8.26 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 9.88 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 17.8 (C35), 17.9 (C33,34), 33.7 (C32), 50.1 (C16,20), 58.2 (C17,19), 73.6 (C31), 105.3 (C1), 115.4 (C5), 116.5 (C11), 120.8 (C7), 122.7 (C28), 124.6 (C26), 125.7 (C25,3), 129.8 (C27), 131.7 (C2,4), 135.6 (C23), 143.5 (C24), 152.1 (C6), 155.3 (C10), 156.8 (C21), 160.3 (C13), 164.3 (C8); LC-MS (m/z, %): 547 (M-H+, 100), 410 (M-H+ − 137, 38), 382 (M-H+ − 165, 71).


#### 2.1.6. 4-[2-(3-Cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]-N-(4-nitrophenyl)piperazine-1-carboxamide (8d)

Yellow solid, Yield: 90%, mp 181–183°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3315 (–N–H, str), 3042 (=C–H, str), 2896 (–C–H, str), 2257 (–CN, str), 1678 (–C=O, str), 1635 (–C=O, str), 1542 (–NO2 (aromatic), asymstr); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 1.04 (d, 6H, J=7.2 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.19–1.28 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.67 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.42 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.68 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.92 (d, 2H, J=6.8 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 7.35 (d, 1H, J=6.4 Hz, Ar-H), 7.54–7.68 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 8.24 (d, 2H, J=6.8 Hz, Ar-H), 10.05 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 17.5 (C35), 17.9 (C33,34), 34.1 (C32), 49.5 (C16,20), 55.6 (C17,19), 71.9 (C31), 106.2 (C1), 116.9 (C5), 117.6 (C11), 120.3 (C7), 122.7 (C24,28), 125.4 (C25,27), 125.9 (C3), 132.4 (C2,4), 141.6 (C26), 145.8 (C23), 150.3 (C6), 155.4 (C10), 156.7 (C21), 159.4 (C13), 165.1 (C8); LC-MS (m/z, %): 547 (M-H+, 100), 382 (M-H+ − 165, 71). Anal. Calcd. for C27H28N6O5S: C, 59.11; H, 5.14; N, 15.32. Found: C, 58.96; H, 5.03; N, 15.20%.


#### 2.1.7. N-(3-Chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-4-[2-(3-cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (8e)

White solid, Yield: 86%, mp 201–203°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3337 (–N–H, str), 3025 (=C–H, str), 2887 (–C–H, str), 2248 (–CN, str), 1675 (–C=O, str), 1630 (–C=O, str), 1154 (–C–F, str), 823 (–C–Cl, str); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.91 (d, 6H, J=7.2 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.01–1.12 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.49 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.57 (t, 4H, J=6.8 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.61 (t, 4H, J=6.4 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.91 (d, 2H, J=6.4 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 7.29–7.38 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.52 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 7.63–7.72 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 9.15 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 17.9 (C35), 18.2 (C33,34), 34.5 (C32), 48.7 (C16,20), 54.8 (C17,19), 71.2 (C31), 105.4 (C1), 115.3 (C5), 116.1 (C11), 117.3 (C27), 118.8 (C7), 123.4 (C24,28), 123.9 (C25), 126.3 (C3), 131.1 (C2,4), 135.2 (C23), 152.1 (C6), 154.3 (C10), 154.8 (C26), 158.9 (C21), 160.8 (C13), 163.7 (C8); LC-MS (m/z, %): 556 (M-H++2, 33), 554 (M-H+, 100), 382 (M-H+ − 172, 64).


#### 2.1.8. N-(3-Bromophenyl)-4-[2-(3-cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]piperazine-1-carbothioamide (8f)

White solid, Yield: 83%, mp 167–169°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3287 (–N–H, str), 3015 (=C–H, str), 2881 (–C–H, str), 2232 (–CN, str), 1673 (–C=O, str), 1187 (–C=S, str), 754 (–C–Br, str); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.93 (d, 6H, J=7.2 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.32–1.38 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.43 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.61 (t, 4H, J=7.6 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.75 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.84 (d, 2H, J=6.8 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 6.47–6.53 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 7.35 (d, 1H, J=6.4 Hz, Ar-H), 7.61–7.72 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 9.76 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 18.4 (C35), 18.5 (C33,34), 32.1 (C32), 47.3 (C16,20), 51.4 (C17,19), 72.8 (C31), 103.2 (C1), 115.6 (C5), 115.8 (C11), 116.2 (C7), 124.1 (C25), 124.8 (C24,28), 125.7 (C3), 126.4 (C26), 129.3 (C27), 133.5 (C2,4), 137.7 (C23), 158.9 (C6), 159.2 (C10), 163.4 (C13), 166.4 (C8), 175.1 (C21); LC-MS (m/z, %): 598 (M-H++2, 97), 596 (M-H+, 100), 382 (M-H+ − 214, 58).


#### 2.1.9. 4-[2-(3-Cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]-N-(4-nitrophenyl)piperazine-1-carbothioamide (8g)

Brown solid, Yield: 86%, mp 171–173°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3293 (–N–H, str), 3022 (=C–H, str), 2887 (–C–H, str), 2235 (–CN, str), 1678 (–C=O, str), 1536 (–NO2 (aromatic), asymstr), 1195 (–C=S, str); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.92 (d, 6H, J=6.8 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.11–1.19 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.78 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.59 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.82 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.91 (d, 2H, J=6.4 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 7.28 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 7.38 (d, 1H, J=6.8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.61–7.71 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 8.22 (d, 2H, J=6.0 Hz, Ar-H), 9.61 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 18.7 (C35), 18.8 (C33,34), 33.6 (C32), 45.1 (C16,20), 50.8 (C17,19), 72.4 (C31), 103.4 (C1), 114.7 (C5), 115.1 (C11), 116.8 (C7), 124.3 (C25,27), 124.6 (C24,28), 125.0 (C3), 132.5 (C2,4), 141.5 (C23), 145.2 (C26), 160.2 (C6), 160.3 (C10), 164.5 (C13), 166.7 (C8), 177.4 (C21); LC-MS (m/z, %): 563 (M-H+, 100), 382 (M-H+ − 181, 66). Anal. Calcd. for C27H28N6O4S2:  C, 57.43; H, 5.00; N, 14.88. Found: C, 57.36; H, 4.94; N, 14.85%.


#### 2.1.10. N-(4-Chlorophenyl)-4-[2-(3-cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]piperazine-1-carbothioamide (8h)

Light orange solid, Yield: 83%, mp 188–190°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3282 (–N–H, str), 3021 (=C–H, str), 2884 (–C–H, str), 2236 (–CN, str), 1674 (–C=O, str), 1182 (–C=S, str), 794 (–C–Cl, str); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.96 (d, 6H, J=7.2 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.05–1.11 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.75 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.54 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.80 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.92 (d, 2H, J=6.8 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 6.88 (d, 2H, J=6.8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.27–7.41 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 7.64 (d, 1H, J=6.4 Hz, Ar-H), 9.52 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 18.1 (C35), 18.4 (C33,34), 32.7 (C32), 45.0 (C16,20), 52.4 (C17,19), 72.1 (C31), 103.8 (C1), 114.9 (C5), 116.7 (C11), 116.8 (C7), 124.3 (C3), 129.7 (C25,27), 130.3 (C24,28), 132.2 (C2,4), 134.5 (C26), 136.7 (C23), 159.6 (C6), 160.5 (C10), 163.7 (C13), 166.2 (C8), 175.3 (C21); LC-MS (m/z, %): 554 (M-H++2, 33), 552 (M-H+, 100).


#### 2.1.11. 4-[2-(3-Cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]-N-(2,6-difluorophenyl)piperazine-1-carbothioamide (8i)

White solid, Yield: 83%, mp 214–216°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3285 (–N–H, str), 3024 (=C–H, str), 2892 (–C–H, str), 2241 (–CN, str), 1680 (–C=O, str), 1190 (–C=S, str), 1178 (–C–F, str); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.96 (d, 6H, J=7.6 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.09–1.17 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.78 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.62 (t, 4H, J=6.8 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.73 (t, 4H, J=6.8 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.95 (d, 2H, J=6.8 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 6.66–6.74 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.26 (d, 1H, J=6.0 Hz, Ar-H), 7.46–7.58 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 10.69 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 18.6 (C35), 19.1 (C33,34), 33.4 (C32), 45.8 (C16,20), 52.9 (C17,19), 72.5 (C31), 105.3 (C1), 113.8 (C25,27), 115.2 (C5), 115.4 (C23), 116.3 (C11), 117.2 (C7), 124.8 (C3), 126.4 (C26), 133.7 (C2,4), 159.7 (C6), 162.3 (C10), 164.5 (C13), 165.5 (C24,28), 166.7 (C8), 179.6 (C21); LC-MS (m/z, %): 554 (M-H+, 100).


#### 2.1.12. 4-[2-(3-Cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]-N-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)piperazine-1-carbothioamide (8j)

Light yellow solid, Yield: 82%, mp 142–144°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3267 (–N–H, str), 3016 (=C–H, str), 2886 (–C–H, str), 2248 (–CN, str), 1683 (–C=O, str), 1186 (–C=S, str), 823 (–C–Cl, str). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.94 (d, 6H, J=7.2 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.09–1.14 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.70 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.57 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.68 (t, 4H, J=6.8 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.91 (d, 2H, J=6.8 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 7.34–7.56 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 7.86 (d, 1H, J=6.0 Hz, Ar-H), 8.24 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 10.53 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); LC-MS (m/z, %): 590 (M-H++4, 11), 588 (M-H++2, 66), 586 (M-H+,100).


### 2.2. Biological Activity

#### 2.2.1. Anti-TMV Activity

(1) Purification of the Virus. Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) is one of the most studied plant virus and it is a major challenge for researchers to control it since it represents a major threat in the production of the cash crops like tobacco. Based on the literature reports on the thiourea and urea derivatives antiviral activity [12], the synthesized compounds 8(a–j) were screened for their antiviral activity against TMV.Anti-TMV activity was evaluated by using Gooding’s method [23]. The upper leaves of Nicotiana tabacum L. were inoculated with tobacco mosaic virus, selected and ground in phosphate buffer, and then filtered through a double-layer pledget. The filtrate was centrifuged at 10000 g bybeing treated twice with polyethylene glycol (PEG) and centrifuged again. The whole experiment was carried out at 4°C. Absorbance of sample was measured at 260 nm using ultraviolet spectrophotometer. The concentration of virus was calculated by using the following formula:
(1)Virusconcn=(A260×dilutionratio)E1cm0.1%,260nm.(2) In Vivo Antiviral ActivityProtective Effect. The compound solutions were smeared on the left side, whereas the solvent served as the control on the right side of the growing N. tabacum L. leaves of the same age. The leaves were then inoculated with the virus of 6 × 10−3 mg/mL after 12 h, which were previously scattered with silicon carbide. The leaves were then washed with water and rubbed softly along the nervature twice. The local lesions appearing after inoculation of 3-4 days were counted. The inhibition rate of the tested samples was calculated according to the following formula. The experiments were repeated in triplicated and average values were taken as a final result as follows:
(2)Inhibitionrate%=[x-yx]×100.
Here, x = av is the number of local lesions in control, y = av is the number of local lesions in tested sample. (av denotes average and control was not treated with compounds).Inactivation Effect. The virus was inhibited by mixing with the compound solutions at the same volume for 30 min. The mixture was then inoculated on the left side of the N. tabacum L. leaves and the right side of the leaves was inoculated with the mixture of solvent and the virus alone. The leaves were then washed with water and rubbed softly along the nervature twice. The local lesions appearing after inoculation of 3-4 days were counted. The inhibition rate of the tested samples was calculated according to the following formula. The experiments were repeated in triplicated and average values were taken as a final result as follows:
(3)Inhibitionrate%=[x-yx]×100.
Here, x = av is the number of local lesions in control, y = av no. is the number of local lesions in tested sample. (av denotes average and control was not treated with compounds).Curative Effect. The same aged growing N. tabacum L. leaves were selected. The concentration of TMV, 6 × 10−3 mg/mL was dipped and inoculated on the whole leaves. Then, the leaves were washed with water and air dried for a few seconds. The compound solution was smeared on the left side and the solvent was smeared on the right side for control. After 3-4 days of inoculation, the local lesions number was then counted and recorded. The experiment was repeated three times with each tested sample. The inhibition rate of the tested samples was calculated according to the following formula (av denotes average and control was not treated with compounds):
(4)Inhibitionrate%=[x-yx]×100.
Here, x = av is the number of local lesions in control, y = av is the number of local lesions in tested sample.(3) Change in Chlorophyll Content of TMV Inoculated Tobacco Leaves after Treatment [24]. The same age growing and healthy tobacco plant leaves were selected for viral tests. Foremost, the 7th leaf was selected and the whole leaf was inoculated with the virus followed by a simple water to rinse for surface sterilization. Leaves were dried and coated with virus inoculums for further analysis. Measurements were made on every second day for chlorophyll content. To determine chlorophyll content, the leaf samples were separated from plant and weighted accurately followed by putting it into 5 mL of 80% acetone at a temperature of 4°C. The dark extraction was performed overnight. The chlorophyll contents of tobacco leaves extracted over night are placed in a 1 cm thick cuvette with 80% of acetone as blank. The UV-Visible spectrometer was employed to measure absorbance of chlorophyll content at 645 nm and 663 nm to evaluate the Chl-a + Chl-b concentrations using the following formula.Chl-a =12.7A663-2.69A645; Chl-b = 22.7A645  −4.68A663.Total chlorophyll content Chl-a + Chl-b = [20.2A645  ±  8.02A663]V×W/1000.In the above formula, A645 and A663 are the absorbance values at the corresponding wave lengths, “V” is the volume of extraction and “W” is the weight of fresh leaf. Finally, chlorophyll content is expressed in mg·g−1FW.


#### 2.2.2. Antimicrobial Activity

(1) Antibacterial Activity. Disc diffusion method [25, 26] was employed to screen the significant antibacterial activity of the synthesized urea and thiourea derivatives 8(a–j) against different bacteria such as Streptococcus aureus (ATCC-25923), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC-25619), and Escherichia coli (ATCC-9637). Ciprofloxacin was used as a standard drug for antibacterial studies. A standard inoculums of 1-2 × 10−7 c.f.u/mL (0.5 McFarland standards) was introduced on to the surface of sterile agar plates, and a sterile glass spreader was used for even distribution of the inoculums. Discs measuring 6 mm in diameter were prepared from Whatman No. 1 filter paper and sterilized by dry heat at 140°C for an hour. The dry sterilized discs soaked in a known concentration (200 μg/mL) of the test compounds were placed in nutrient agar medium. Blank test showed that DMSO used in the preparation of the test solutions does not affect the bacteria. The plates after inoculation were inverted and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. The zone of inhibition around the disc which was calculated edge to edge zone of the confluent growth usually corresponds to the sharpest edge of the zone and was measured in millimeters. All tests were repeated three times and average data was taken as final result. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were also determined by microbroth dilution technique [27–29]. Specifically 0.1 mL of standardized inoculum (1-2 × 107 c.f.u/mL) was added to test tubes and incubated for 24 h at 37°C and two controls were maintained for each test sample. The growth was monitored visually and spectrophotometrically. The lowest concentration (highest dilution) required to arrest the growth of bacteria was regarded as minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).(2) Antifungal Activity. The antifungal activity of the titled urea and thiourea derivatives 8(a–j) were screened against fungal strains such as Aspergillus flavus (MTCC-1884), Aspergillus niger (MTCC-1881), and Candida albicans (ATCC- 2091) using agar disc-diffusion method [27–29]. The fungal strains were maintained on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium (Hi-Media). A loop full of culture from the slant was inoculated into the Potato Dextrose broth and incubated at 37°C for 48–72 h. This culture (0.1 mL) was spread on the potato dextrose agar plate and a sterile glass spreader was used for even distribution of the inoculums. All the compounds were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Sterile discs of Whatman No. 1 filter paper of about 6 mm diameter were dried and soaked in 200 μg/mL concentration of the test samples. The soaked discs were impregnated on the surface of the media and incubated for 48–72 h at 37°C. Blank test showed that DMSO used in the preparations of the test solutions does not affect the test fungi. The zone of inhibition around the disc was the calculated edge to edge zone of the confluent growth which usually corresponds to the sharpest edge of the zone and was measured in millimeters. All tests were repeated three times and average data was taken as final result. Fluconazole was used as a standard drug for antifungal study. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of the tested samples was determined by micro-broth-dilution method [27–29]. Specifically 0.1 mL of standardized inoculum (1-2 × 107 c.f.u/mL) was added to each test tube. The tubes were incubated aerobically at 37°C for 48–72 h. Control was maintained for each test sample. The lowest concentrations (highest dilution) of test compound that produced no visible signs of fungal growth (no turbidity) when compared with the control tubes were regarded as MICs.


## 2.1. Chemistry

All chemicals and reagents used for the synthesis were commercially available, and AR grade solvents/reagents were used as such were received from Sigma-Aldrich and Merck. All solvents used for spectroscopic and other physical studies were reagent grade and were further purified by the literature methods [22]. All melting points (m.p) were obtained with a digital Guna melting point apparatus and are uncorrected. IR spectra were recorded on a Perkin Elmer 283 unit using KBr discs. 1H/13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker 400 MHz NMR spectrometer operating at 400 MHz for 1H and 100.25 MHz for 13C in DMSO-d6 solvent and TMS was used as internal standard. Chemical shift values (δ) and coupling constants (J) are reported in ppm and Hz, respectively. Standard abbreviations indicating multiplicity are used as follows: “s” for singlet, “d” for doublet, “dd” for doublet of doublets, “t” for triplet, “q” for quartet, “m” for multiplet, and “br” for broad. LC-MS spectra were recorded on a Jeol SX 102 DA/600 Mass spectrometer. Elemental analyses were performed on a Thermo Finnigan Instrument at the University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India. Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was carried out on precoated plates and spots were visualized with UV light.


### 2.1.1. Synthetic Procedure for the Synthesis of 2-Isobutoxy-5-(4-methyl-2-(piperazine-1-carbonyl)thiazol-5-yl)benzonitrile (4)

Febuxostat (3) (2.97 g, 9.4 mmol) was dissolved in 50 mL of dry dichloromethane (DCM) in a flask and base and diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA) (2.5 mL, 14.0 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 20 min at room temperature to get homogeneous solution. The reagent, T3P (3.6 mL, 12.0 mmol) and piperazine (0.81 g, 9.4 mmol) were added to the reaction mixture with stirring. Then, the reaction mixture was stirred vigorously for 8 h at room temperature. After completion of the reaction as checked by TLC, the solid was filtered off and recrystallized from methanol to afford 2-isobutoxy-5-(4-methyl-2-(piperazine-1-carbonyl)thiazol-5-yl)benzonitrile (4) (3.54 g) (94%). Mol. Wt 384, mp 154–156°C. IR (KBr, υ cm−1): 3334 (–N–H, str), 3015 (=C–H, str), 2240 (–CN, str), 1654 (–C=O, str). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.92 (d, 6H, J=7.6 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.28–1.42 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.43 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.12 (t, 4H, J=6.8 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.28 (t, 4H, J=6.8 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.79 (d, 2H, J=7.6 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 6.98 (d, 1H, J=6.4 Hz, Ar-H), 7.21 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 7.64 (d, 1H, J=6.0 Hz, Ar-H). LC-MS (m/z, %): 383 (M-H+, 100).


### 2.1.2. Typical Procedure for the Synthesis of Title Urea/Thiourea Derivatives8(a–j)

The synthesized intermediate, 2-isobutoxy-5-(4-methyl-2-(piperazine-1-carbonyl)thiazol-5-yl)benzonitrile (4) (250 mg, 0.65 mmol), 1-isocyanato-4-nitrobenzene (7d) (106.38 mg, 0.65 mmol) and N,N-dimethylpiperazine (0.13 mL, 0.98 mmol) were dissolved in 20 mL of THF in a flask and refluxed with vigorous stirring for 2.5 h. After completion of the reaction as indicated by TLC, the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure to get crude product 8d. The crude product was purified by column chromatography using 3 : 7 ratio of ethyl acetate and n-hexane as an eluent to get pure 4-(5-(3-cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-2-carbonyl)-N-(4-nitrophenyl)piperazine-1-carboxamide (8d) (321 mg, 90%). All the other title compounds were synthesized using the above experimental procedure.


### 2.1.3. 4-[2-(3-Cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]-N-(4-fluorophenyl)piperazine-1-carboxamide (8a)

Light brown solid, Yield: 85%, mp 182–184°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3296 (–N–H, str), 3015 (=C–H, str), 2889 (–C–H, str), 2243 (–CN, str), 1676 (–C=O, str), 1638 (–C=O, str), 1167 (–C–F, str); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.94 (d, 6H, J=8.8 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.28–1.42 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.56 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.39 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.68 (t, 4H, J=6.8 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.85 (d, 2H, J=7.6 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 7.36–7.43 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.61 (d, 2H, J=6.4 Hz, Ar-H), 7.73–7.81 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 9.51 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 17.4 (C35), 18.9 (C33,34), 31.2 (C32), 48.6 (C16,20), 51.2 (C17,19), 73.1 (C31), 104.6 (C1), 113.9 (C25,27), 114.6 (C5), 118.2 (C11), 119.4 (C7), 120.1 (C24,28), 123.4 (C3), 126.2 (C2), 130.4 (C4), 136.6 (C23), 151.3 (C6), 154.8 (C10), 158.3 (C21), 162.2 (C13), 165.7 (C26), 166.2 (C8); LC-MS (m/z, %): 520 (M-H+, 100), 410  (M-H+ − 110, 30), 382 (M-H+ − 138, 73); Anal. Calcd. for C27H28FN5O3S:  C, 62.17; H, 5.41; N, 13.43. Found: C, 61.93; H, 5.34; N, 13.48%.


### 2.1.4. N-(4-Bromophenyl)-4-[2-(3-cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (8b)

White solid, Yield: 81%, mp 163-165°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3312 (–N–H, str), 3018 (=C–H, str), 2885 (–C–H, str), 2235 (–CN, str), 1672 (–C=O, str), 1646 (–C=O, str), 748 (–C–Br, str); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.89 (d, 6H, J=7.6 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.21–1.33 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.51 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.34 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.51 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.74 (d, 2H, J=6.8 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 7.27 (d, 1H, J=6.8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.18 (d, 2H, J=6.4 Hz, Ar-H), 7.26–7.39 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 9.28 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 17.1 (C35), 17.9 (C33,34), 33.4 (C32), 49.8 (C16,20), 51.4 (C17,19), 72.8 (C31), 104.4 (C1), 113.6 (C25,27), 114.8 (C5), 117.5 (C11), 118.1 (C7), 121.4 (C24,28), 122.7 (C26), 124.5 (C3), 125.8 (C2), 128.7 (C4), 136.3 (C23), 152.6 (C6), 154.7 (C10), 157.2 (C21), 160.1 (C13), 164.7 (C8); LC-MS (m/z, %): 582 (M-H++2, 97), 580 (M-H+, 100), 410 (M-H+ − 170, 46).


### 2.1.5. 4-[2-(3-Cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]-N-(2-nitrophenyl)piperazine-1-carboxamide (8c)

Brown powdered solid, Yield: 89%, mp 176–178°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3320 (–N–H, str), 3051 (=C–H, str), 2892 (–C–H, str), 2248 (–CN, str), 1674 (–C=O, str), 1640 (–C=O, str), 1546 (–NO2 (aromatic), asymstr); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.98 (d, 6H, J=7.2 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.24–1.31 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.73 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.55 (t, 4H, J=6.8 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.68 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.96 (d, 2H, J=7.6 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 7.35 (d, 1H, J=6.4 Hz, Ar-H), 7.64–7.79 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 8.18–8.26 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 9.88 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 17.8 (C35), 17.9 (C33,34), 33.7 (C32), 50.1 (C16,20), 58.2 (C17,19), 73.6 (C31), 105.3 (C1), 115.4 (C5), 116.5 (C11), 120.8 (C7), 122.7 (C28), 124.6 (C26), 125.7 (C25,3), 129.8 (C27), 131.7 (C2,4), 135.6 (C23), 143.5 (C24), 152.1 (C6), 155.3 (C10), 156.8 (C21), 160.3 (C13), 164.3 (C8); LC-MS (m/z, %): 547 (M-H+, 100), 410 (M-H+ − 137, 38), 382 (M-H+ − 165, 71).


### 2.1.6. 4-[2-(3-Cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]-N-(4-nitrophenyl)piperazine-1-carboxamide (8d)

Yellow solid, Yield: 90%, mp 181–183°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3315 (–N–H, str), 3042 (=C–H, str), 2896 (–C–H, str), 2257 (–CN, str), 1678 (–C=O, str), 1635 (–C=O, str), 1542 (–NO2 (aromatic), asymstr); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 1.04 (d, 6H, J=7.2 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.19–1.28 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.67 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.42 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.68 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.92 (d, 2H, J=6.8 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 7.35 (d, 1H, J=6.4 Hz, Ar-H), 7.54–7.68 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 8.24 (d, 2H, J=6.8 Hz, Ar-H), 10.05 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 17.5 (C35), 17.9 (C33,34), 34.1 (C32), 49.5 (C16,20), 55.6 (C17,19), 71.9 (C31), 106.2 (C1), 116.9 (C5), 117.6 (C11), 120.3 (C7), 122.7 (C24,28), 125.4 (C25,27), 125.9 (C3), 132.4 (C2,4), 141.6 (C26), 145.8 (C23), 150.3 (C6), 155.4 (C10), 156.7 (C21), 159.4 (C13), 165.1 (C8); LC-MS (m/z, %): 547 (M-H+, 100), 382 (M-H+ − 165, 71). Anal. Calcd. for C27H28N6O5S: C, 59.11; H, 5.14; N, 15.32. Found: C, 58.96; H, 5.03; N, 15.20%.


### 2.1.7. N-(3-Chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-4-[2-(3-cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (8e)

White solid, Yield: 86%, mp 201–203°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3337 (–N–H, str), 3025 (=C–H, str), 2887 (–C–H, str), 2248 (–CN, str), 1675 (–C=O, str), 1630 (–C=O, str), 1154 (–C–F, str), 823 (–C–Cl, str); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.91 (d, 6H, J=7.2 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.01–1.12 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.49 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.57 (t, 4H, J=6.8 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.61 (t, 4H, J=6.4 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.91 (d, 2H, J=6.4 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 7.29–7.38 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.52 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 7.63–7.72 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 9.15 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 17.9 (C35), 18.2 (C33,34), 34.5 (C32), 48.7 (C16,20), 54.8 (C17,19), 71.2 (C31), 105.4 (C1), 115.3 (C5), 116.1 (C11), 117.3 (C27), 118.8 (C7), 123.4 (C24,28), 123.9 (C25), 126.3 (C3), 131.1 (C2,4), 135.2 (C23), 152.1 (C6), 154.3 (C10), 154.8 (C26), 158.9 (C21), 160.8 (C13), 163.7 (C8); LC-MS (m/z, %): 556 (M-H++2, 33), 554 (M-H+, 100), 382 (M-H+ − 172, 64).


### 2.1.8. N-(3-Bromophenyl)-4-[2-(3-cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]piperazine-1-carbothioamide (8f)

White solid, Yield: 83%, mp 167–169°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3287 (–N–H, str), 3015 (=C–H, str), 2881 (–C–H, str), 2232 (–CN, str), 1673 (–C=O, str), 1187 (–C=S, str), 754 (–C–Br, str); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.93 (d, 6H, J=7.2 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.32–1.38 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.43 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.61 (t, 4H, J=7.6 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.75 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.84 (d, 2H, J=6.8 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 6.47–6.53 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 7.35 (d, 1H, J=6.4 Hz, Ar-H), 7.61–7.72 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 9.76 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 18.4 (C35), 18.5 (C33,34), 32.1 (C32), 47.3 (C16,20), 51.4 (C17,19), 72.8 (C31), 103.2 (C1), 115.6 (C5), 115.8 (C11), 116.2 (C7), 124.1 (C25), 124.8 (C24,28), 125.7 (C3), 126.4 (C26), 129.3 (C27), 133.5 (C2,4), 137.7 (C23), 158.9 (C6), 159.2 (C10), 163.4 (C13), 166.4 (C8), 175.1 (C21); LC-MS (m/z, %): 598 (M-H++2, 97), 596 (M-H+, 100), 382 (M-H+ − 214, 58).


### 2.1.9. 4-[2-(3-Cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]-N-(4-nitrophenyl)piperazine-1-carbothioamide (8g)

Brown solid, Yield: 86%, mp 171–173°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3293 (–N–H, str), 3022 (=C–H, str), 2887 (–C–H, str), 2235 (–CN, str), 1678 (–C=O, str), 1536 (–NO2 (aromatic), asymstr), 1195 (–C=S, str); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.92 (d, 6H, J=6.8 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.11–1.19 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.78 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.59 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.82 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.91 (d, 2H, J=6.4 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 7.28 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 7.38 (d, 1H, J=6.8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.61–7.71 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 8.22 (d, 2H, J=6.0 Hz, Ar-H), 9.61 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 18.7 (C35), 18.8 (C33,34), 33.6 (C32), 45.1 (C16,20), 50.8 (C17,19), 72.4 (C31), 103.4 (C1), 114.7 (C5), 115.1 (C11), 116.8 (C7), 124.3 (C25,27), 124.6 (C24,28), 125.0 (C3), 132.5 (C2,4), 141.5 (C23), 145.2 (C26), 160.2 (C6), 160.3 (C10), 164.5 (C13), 166.7 (C8), 177.4 (C21); LC-MS (m/z, %): 563 (M-H+, 100), 382 (M-H+ − 181, 66). Anal. Calcd. for C27H28N6O4S2:  C, 57.43; H, 5.00; N, 14.88. Found: C, 57.36; H, 4.94; N, 14.85%.


### 2.1.10. N-(4-Chlorophenyl)-4-[2-(3-cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]piperazine-1-carbothioamide (8h)

Light orange solid, Yield: 83%, mp 188–190°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3282 (–N–H, str), 3021 (=C–H, str), 2884 (–C–H, str), 2236 (–CN, str), 1674 (–C=O, str), 1182 (–C=S, str), 794 (–C–Cl, str); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.96 (d, 6H, J=7.2 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.05–1.11 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.75 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.54 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.80 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.92 (d, 2H, J=6.8 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 6.88 (d, 2H, J=6.8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.27–7.41 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 7.64 (d, 1H, J=6.4 Hz, Ar-H), 9.52 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 18.1 (C35), 18.4 (C33,34), 32.7 (C32), 45.0 (C16,20), 52.4 (C17,19), 72.1 (C31), 103.8 (C1), 114.9 (C5), 116.7 (C11), 116.8 (C7), 124.3 (C3), 129.7 (C25,27), 130.3 (C24,28), 132.2 (C2,4), 134.5 (C26), 136.7 (C23), 159.6 (C6), 160.5 (C10), 163.7 (C13), 166.2 (C8), 175.3 (C21); LC-MS (m/z, %): 554 (M-H++2, 33), 552 (M-H+, 100).


### 2.1.11. 4-[2-(3-Cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]-N-(2,6-difluorophenyl)piperazine-1-carbothioamide (8i)

White solid, Yield: 83%, mp 214–216°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3285 (–N–H, str), 3024 (=C–H, str), 2892 (–C–H, str), 2241 (–CN, str), 1680 (–C=O, str), 1190 (–C=S, str), 1178 (–C–F, str); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.96 (d, 6H, J=7.6 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.09–1.17 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.78 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.62 (t, 4H, J=6.8 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.73 (t, 4H, J=6.8 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.95 (d, 2H, J=6.8 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 6.66–6.74 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.26 (d, 1H, J=6.0 Hz, Ar-H), 7.46–7.58 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 10.69 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 18.6 (C35), 19.1 (C33,34), 33.4 (C32), 45.8 (C16,20), 52.9 (C17,19), 72.5 (C31), 105.3 (C1), 113.8 (C25,27), 115.2 (C5), 115.4 (C23), 116.3 (C11), 117.2 (C7), 124.8 (C3), 126.4 (C26), 133.7 (C2,4), 159.7 (C6), 162.3 (C10), 164.5 (C13), 165.5 (C24,28), 166.7 (C8), 179.6 (C21); LC-MS (m/z, %): 554 (M-H+, 100).


### 2.1.12. 4-[2-(3-Cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]-N-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)piperazine-1-carbothioamide (8j)

Light yellow solid, Yield: 82%, mp 142–144°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3267 (–N–H, str), 3016 (=C–H, str), 2886 (–C–H, str), 2248 (–CN, str), 1683 (–C=O, str), 1186 (–C=S, str), 823 (–C–Cl, str). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.94 (d, 6H, J=7.2 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.09–1.14 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.70 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.57 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.68 (t, 4H, J=6.8 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.91 (d, 2H, J=6.8 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 7.34–7.56 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 7.86 (d, 1H, J=6.0 Hz, Ar-H), 8.24 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 10.53 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); LC-MS (m/z, %): 590 (M-H++4, 11), 588 (M-H++2, 66), 586 (M-H+,100).


## 2.1.1. Synthetic Procedure for the Synthesis of 2-Isobutoxy-5-(4-methyl-2-(piperazine-1-carbonyl)thiazol-5-yl)benzonitrile (4)

Febuxostat (3) (2.97 g, 9.4 mmol) was dissolved in 50 mL of dry dichloromethane (DCM) in a flask and base and diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA) (2.5 mL, 14.0 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 20 min at room temperature to get homogeneous solution. The reagent, T3P (3.6 mL, 12.0 mmol) and piperazine (0.81 g, 9.4 mmol) were added to the reaction mixture with stirring. Then, the reaction mixture was stirred vigorously for 8 h at room temperature. After completion of the reaction as checked by TLC, the solid was filtered off and recrystallized from methanol to afford 2-isobutoxy-5-(4-methyl-2-(piperazine-1-carbonyl)thiazol-5-yl)benzonitrile (4) (3.54 g) (94%). Mol. Wt 384, mp 154–156°C. IR (KBr, υ cm−1): 3334 (–N–H, str), 3015 (=C–H, str), 2240 (–CN, str), 1654 (–C=O, str). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.92 (d, 6H, J=7.6 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.28–1.42 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.43 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.12 (t, 4H, J=6.8 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.28 (t, 4H, J=6.8 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.79 (d, 2H, J=7.6 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 6.98 (d, 1H, J=6.4 Hz, Ar-H), 7.21 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 7.64 (d, 1H, J=6.0 Hz, Ar-H). LC-MS (m/z, %): 383 (M-H+, 100).


## 2.1.2. Typical Procedure for the Synthesis of Title Urea/Thiourea Derivatives8(a–j)

The synthesized intermediate, 2-isobutoxy-5-(4-methyl-2-(piperazine-1-carbonyl)thiazol-5-yl)benzonitrile (4) (250 mg, 0.65 mmol), 1-isocyanato-4-nitrobenzene (7d) (106.38 mg, 0.65 mmol) and N,N-dimethylpiperazine (0.13 mL, 0.98 mmol) were dissolved in 20 mL of THF in a flask and refluxed with vigorous stirring for 2.5 h. After completion of the reaction as indicated by TLC, the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure to get crude product 8d. The crude product was purified by column chromatography using 3 : 7 ratio of ethyl acetate and n-hexane as an eluent to get pure 4-(5-(3-cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-2-carbonyl)-N-(4-nitrophenyl)piperazine-1-carboxamide (8d) (321 mg, 90%). All the other title compounds were synthesized using the above experimental procedure.


## 2.1.3. 4-[2-(3-Cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]-N-(4-fluorophenyl)piperazine-1-carboxamide (8a)

Light brown solid, Yield: 85%, mp 182–184°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3296 (–N–H, str), 3015 (=C–H, str), 2889 (–C–H, str), 2243 (–CN, str), 1676 (–C=O, str), 1638 (–C=O, str), 1167 (–C–F, str); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.94 (d, 6H, J=8.8 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.28–1.42 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.56 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.39 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.68 (t, 4H, J=6.8 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.85 (d, 2H, J=7.6 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 7.36–7.43 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.61 (d, 2H, J=6.4 Hz, Ar-H), 7.73–7.81 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 9.51 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 17.4 (C35), 18.9 (C33,34), 31.2 (C32), 48.6 (C16,20), 51.2 (C17,19), 73.1 (C31), 104.6 (C1), 113.9 (C25,27), 114.6 (C5), 118.2 (C11), 119.4 (C7), 120.1 (C24,28), 123.4 (C3), 126.2 (C2), 130.4 (C4), 136.6 (C23), 151.3 (C6), 154.8 (C10), 158.3 (C21), 162.2 (C13), 165.7 (C26), 166.2 (C8); LC-MS (m/z, %): 520 (M-H+, 100), 410  (M-H+ − 110, 30), 382 (M-H+ − 138, 73); Anal. Calcd. for C27H28FN5O3S:  C, 62.17; H, 5.41; N, 13.43. Found: C, 61.93; H, 5.34; N, 13.48%.


## 2.1.4. N-(4-Bromophenyl)-4-[2-(3-cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (8b)

White solid, Yield: 81%, mp 163-165°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3312 (–N–H, str), 3018 (=C–H, str), 2885 (–C–H, str), 2235 (–CN, str), 1672 (–C=O, str), 1646 (–C=O, str), 748 (–C–Br, str); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.89 (d, 6H, J=7.6 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.21–1.33 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.51 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.34 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.51 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.74 (d, 2H, J=6.8 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 7.27 (d, 1H, J=6.8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.18 (d, 2H, J=6.4 Hz, Ar-H), 7.26–7.39 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 9.28 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 17.1 (C35), 17.9 (C33,34), 33.4 (C32), 49.8 (C16,20), 51.4 (C17,19), 72.8 (C31), 104.4 (C1), 113.6 (C25,27), 114.8 (C5), 117.5 (C11), 118.1 (C7), 121.4 (C24,28), 122.7 (C26), 124.5 (C3), 125.8 (C2), 128.7 (C4), 136.3 (C23), 152.6 (C6), 154.7 (C10), 157.2 (C21), 160.1 (C13), 164.7 (C8); LC-MS (m/z, %): 582 (M-H++2, 97), 580 (M-H+, 100), 410 (M-H+ − 170, 46).


## 2.1.5. 4-[2-(3-Cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]-N-(2-nitrophenyl)piperazine-1-carboxamide (8c)

Brown powdered solid, Yield: 89%, mp 176–178°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3320 (–N–H, str), 3051 (=C–H, str), 2892 (–C–H, str), 2248 (–CN, str), 1674 (–C=O, str), 1640 (–C=O, str), 1546 (–NO2 (aromatic), asymstr); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.98 (d, 6H, J=7.2 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.24–1.31 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.73 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.55 (t, 4H, J=6.8 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.68 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.96 (d, 2H, J=7.6 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 7.35 (d, 1H, J=6.4 Hz, Ar-H), 7.64–7.79 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 8.18–8.26 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 9.88 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 17.8 (C35), 17.9 (C33,34), 33.7 (C32), 50.1 (C16,20), 58.2 (C17,19), 73.6 (C31), 105.3 (C1), 115.4 (C5), 116.5 (C11), 120.8 (C7), 122.7 (C28), 124.6 (C26), 125.7 (C25,3), 129.8 (C27), 131.7 (C2,4), 135.6 (C23), 143.5 (C24), 152.1 (C6), 155.3 (C10), 156.8 (C21), 160.3 (C13), 164.3 (C8); LC-MS (m/z, %): 547 (M-H+, 100), 410 (M-H+ − 137, 38), 382 (M-H+ − 165, 71).


## 2.1.6. 4-[2-(3-Cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]-N-(4-nitrophenyl)piperazine-1-carboxamide (8d)

Yellow solid, Yield: 90%, mp 181–183°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3315 (–N–H, str), 3042 (=C–H, str), 2896 (–C–H, str), 2257 (–CN, str), 1678 (–C=O, str), 1635 (–C=O, str), 1542 (–NO2 (aromatic), asymstr); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 1.04 (d, 6H, J=7.2 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.19–1.28 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.67 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.42 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.68 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.92 (d, 2H, J=6.8 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 7.35 (d, 1H, J=6.4 Hz, Ar-H), 7.54–7.68 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 8.24 (d, 2H, J=6.8 Hz, Ar-H), 10.05 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 17.5 (C35), 17.9 (C33,34), 34.1 (C32), 49.5 (C16,20), 55.6 (C17,19), 71.9 (C31), 106.2 (C1), 116.9 (C5), 117.6 (C11), 120.3 (C7), 122.7 (C24,28), 125.4 (C25,27), 125.9 (C3), 132.4 (C2,4), 141.6 (C26), 145.8 (C23), 150.3 (C6), 155.4 (C10), 156.7 (C21), 159.4 (C13), 165.1 (C8); LC-MS (m/z, %): 547 (M-H+, 100), 382 (M-H+ − 165, 71). Anal. Calcd. for C27H28N6O5S: C, 59.11; H, 5.14; N, 15.32. Found: C, 58.96; H, 5.03; N, 15.20%.


## 2.1.7. N-(3-Chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-4-[2-(3-cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (8e)

White solid, Yield: 86%, mp 201–203°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3337 (–N–H, str), 3025 (=C–H, str), 2887 (–C–H, str), 2248 (–CN, str), 1675 (–C=O, str), 1630 (–C=O, str), 1154 (–C–F, str), 823 (–C–Cl, str); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.91 (d, 6H, J=7.2 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.01–1.12 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.49 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.57 (t, 4H, J=6.8 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.61 (t, 4H, J=6.4 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.91 (d, 2H, J=6.4 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 7.29–7.38 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.52 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 7.63–7.72 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 9.15 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 17.9 (C35), 18.2 (C33,34), 34.5 (C32), 48.7 (C16,20), 54.8 (C17,19), 71.2 (C31), 105.4 (C1), 115.3 (C5), 116.1 (C11), 117.3 (C27), 118.8 (C7), 123.4 (C24,28), 123.9 (C25), 126.3 (C3), 131.1 (C2,4), 135.2 (C23), 152.1 (C6), 154.3 (C10), 154.8 (C26), 158.9 (C21), 160.8 (C13), 163.7 (C8); LC-MS (m/z, %): 556 (M-H++2, 33), 554 (M-H+, 100), 382 (M-H+ − 172, 64).


## 2.1.8. N-(3-Bromophenyl)-4-[2-(3-cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]piperazine-1-carbothioamide (8f)

White solid, Yield: 83%, mp 167–169°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3287 (–N–H, str), 3015 (=C–H, str), 2881 (–C–H, str), 2232 (–CN, str), 1673 (–C=O, str), 1187 (–C=S, str), 754 (–C–Br, str); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.93 (d, 6H, J=7.2 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.32–1.38 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.43 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.61 (t, 4H, J=7.6 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.75 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.84 (d, 2H, J=6.8 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 6.47–6.53 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 7.35 (d, 1H, J=6.4 Hz, Ar-H), 7.61–7.72 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 9.76 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 18.4 (C35), 18.5 (C33,34), 32.1 (C32), 47.3 (C16,20), 51.4 (C17,19), 72.8 (C31), 103.2 (C1), 115.6 (C5), 115.8 (C11), 116.2 (C7), 124.1 (C25), 124.8 (C24,28), 125.7 (C3), 126.4 (C26), 129.3 (C27), 133.5 (C2,4), 137.7 (C23), 158.9 (C6), 159.2 (C10), 163.4 (C13), 166.4 (C8), 175.1 (C21); LC-MS (m/z, %): 598 (M-H++2, 97), 596 (M-H+, 100), 382 (M-H+ − 214, 58).


## 2.1.9. 4-[2-(3-Cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]-N-(4-nitrophenyl)piperazine-1-carbothioamide (8g)

Brown solid, Yield: 86%, mp 171–173°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3293 (–N–H, str), 3022 (=C–H, str), 2887 (–C–H, str), 2235 (–CN, str), 1678 (–C=O, str), 1536 (–NO2 (aromatic), asymstr), 1195 (–C=S, str); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.92 (d, 6H, J=6.8 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.11–1.19 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.78 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.59 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.82 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.91 (d, 2H, J=6.4 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 7.28 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 7.38 (d, 1H, J=6.8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.61–7.71 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 8.22 (d, 2H, J=6.0 Hz, Ar-H), 9.61 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 18.7 (C35), 18.8 (C33,34), 33.6 (C32), 45.1 (C16,20), 50.8 (C17,19), 72.4 (C31), 103.4 (C1), 114.7 (C5), 115.1 (C11), 116.8 (C7), 124.3 (C25,27), 124.6 (C24,28), 125.0 (C3), 132.5 (C2,4), 141.5 (C23), 145.2 (C26), 160.2 (C6), 160.3 (C10), 164.5 (C13), 166.7 (C8), 177.4 (C21); LC-MS (m/z, %): 563 (M-H+, 100), 382 (M-H+ − 181, 66). Anal. Calcd. for C27H28N6O4S2:  C, 57.43; H, 5.00; N, 14.88. Found: C, 57.36; H, 4.94; N, 14.85%.


## 2.1.10. N-(4-Chlorophenyl)-4-[2-(3-cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]piperazine-1-carbothioamide (8h)

Light orange solid, Yield: 83%, mp 188–190°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3282 (–N–H, str), 3021 (=C–H, str), 2884 (–C–H, str), 2236 (–CN, str), 1674 (–C=O, str), 1182 (–C=S, str), 794 (–C–Cl, str); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.96 (d, 6H, J=7.2 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.05–1.11 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.75 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.54 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.80 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.92 (d, 2H, J=6.8 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 6.88 (d, 2H, J=6.8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.27–7.41 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 7.64 (d, 1H, J=6.4 Hz, Ar-H), 9.52 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 18.1 (C35), 18.4 (C33,34), 32.7 (C32), 45.0 (C16,20), 52.4 (C17,19), 72.1 (C31), 103.8 (C1), 114.9 (C5), 116.7 (C11), 116.8 (C7), 124.3 (C3), 129.7 (C25,27), 130.3 (C24,28), 132.2 (C2,4), 134.5 (C26), 136.7 (C23), 159.6 (C6), 160.5 (C10), 163.7 (C13), 166.2 (C8), 175.3 (C21); LC-MS (m/z, %): 554 (M-H++2, 33), 552 (M-H+, 100).


## 2.1.11. 4-[2-(3-Cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]-N-(2,6-difluorophenyl)piperazine-1-carbothioamide (8i)

White solid, Yield: 83%, mp 214–216°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3285 (–N–H, str), 3024 (=C–H, str), 2892 (–C–H, str), 2241 (–CN, str), 1680 (–C=O, str), 1190 (–C=S, str), 1178 (–C–F, str); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.96 (d, 6H, J=7.6 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.09–1.17 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.78 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.62 (t, 4H, J=6.8 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.73 (t, 4H, J=6.8 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.95 (d, 2H, J=6.8 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 6.66–6.74 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.26 (d, 1H, J=6.0 Hz, Ar-H), 7.46–7.58 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 10.69 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100.25 MHz) δ (ppm): 18.6 (C35), 19.1 (C33,34), 33.4 (C32), 45.8 (C16,20), 52.9 (C17,19), 72.5 (C31), 105.3 (C1), 113.8 (C25,27), 115.2 (C5), 115.4 (C23), 116.3 (C11), 117.2 (C7), 124.8 (C3), 126.4 (C26), 133.7 (C2,4), 159.7 (C6), 162.3 (C10), 164.5 (C13), 165.5 (C24,28), 166.7 (C8), 179.6 (C21); LC-MS (m/z, %): 554 (M-H+, 100).


## 2.1.12. 4-[2-(3-Cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carbonyl]-N-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)piperazine-1-carbothioamide (8j)

Light yellow solid, Yield: 82%, mp 142–144°C. IR (KBr,υ cm−1): 3267 (–N–H, str), 3016 (=C–H, str), 2886 (–C–H, str), 2248 (–CN, str), 1683 (–C=O, str), 1186 (–C=S, str), 823 (–C–Cl, str). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 0.94 (d, 6H, J=7.2 Hz, (CH3)2–CH–), 1.09–1.14 (m, 1H, (CH3)2–CH–CH2–), 2.70 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.57 (t, 4H, J=7.2 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.68 (t, 4H, J=6.8 Hz, –CH2–N–CH2–), 3.91 (d, 2H, J=6.8 Hz, –O–CH2–CH–), 7.34–7.56 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 7.86 (d, 1H, J=6.0 Hz, Ar-H), 8.24 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 10.53 (s, 1H, –NH–C=O); LC-MS (m/z, %): 590 (M-H++4, 11), 588 (M-H++2, 66), 586 (M-H+,100).


## 2.2. Biological Activity

### 2.2.1. Anti-TMV Activity

(1) Purification of the Virus. Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) is one of the most studied plant virus and it is a major challenge for researchers to control it since it represents a major threat in the production of the cash crops like tobacco. Based on the literature reports on the thiourea and urea derivatives antiviral activity [12], the synthesized compounds 8(a–j) were screened for their antiviral activity against TMV.Anti-TMV activity was evaluated by using Gooding’s method [23]. The upper leaves of Nicotiana tabacum L. were inoculated with tobacco mosaic virus, selected and ground in phosphate buffer, and then filtered through a double-layer pledget. The filtrate was centrifuged at 10000 g bybeing treated twice with polyethylene glycol (PEG) and centrifuged again. The whole experiment was carried out at 4°C. Absorbance of sample was measured at 260 nm using ultraviolet spectrophotometer. The concentration of virus was calculated by using the following formula:
(1)Virusconcn=(A260×dilutionratio)E1cm0.1%,260nm.(2) In Vivo Antiviral ActivityProtective Effect. The compound solutions were smeared on the left side, whereas the solvent served as the control on the right side of the growing N. tabacum L. leaves of the same age. The leaves were then inoculated with the virus of 6 × 10−3 mg/mL after 12 h, which were previously scattered with silicon carbide. The leaves were then washed with water and rubbed softly along the nervature twice. The local lesions appearing after inoculation of 3-4 days were counted. The inhibition rate of the tested samples was calculated according to the following formula. The experiments were repeated in triplicated and average values were taken as a final result as follows:
(2)Inhibitionrate%=[x-yx]×100.
Here, x = av is the number of local lesions in control, y = av is the number of local lesions in tested sample. (av denotes average and control was not treated with compounds).Inactivation Effect. The virus was inhibited by mixing with the compound solutions at the same volume for 30 min. The mixture was then inoculated on the left side of the N. tabacum L. leaves and the right side of the leaves was inoculated with the mixture of solvent and the virus alone. The leaves were then washed with water and rubbed softly along the nervature twice. The local lesions appearing after inoculation of 3-4 days were counted. The inhibition rate of the tested samples was calculated according to the following formula. The experiments were repeated in triplicated and average values were taken as a final result as follows:
(3)Inhibitionrate%=[x-yx]×100.
Here, x = av is the number of local lesions in control, y = av no. is the number of local lesions in tested sample. (av denotes average and control was not treated with compounds).Curative Effect. The same aged growing N. tabacum L. leaves were selected. The concentration of TMV, 6 × 10−3 mg/mL was dipped and inoculated on the whole leaves. Then, the leaves were washed with water and air dried for a few seconds. The compound solution was smeared on the left side and the solvent was smeared on the right side for control. After 3-4 days of inoculation, the local lesions number was then counted and recorded. The experiment was repeated three times with each tested sample. The inhibition rate of the tested samples was calculated according to the following formula (av denotes average and control was not treated with compounds):
(4)Inhibitionrate%=[x-yx]×100.
Here, x = av is the number of local lesions in control, y = av is the number of local lesions in tested sample.(3) Change in Chlorophyll Content of TMV Inoculated Tobacco Leaves after Treatment [24]. The same age growing and healthy tobacco plant leaves were selected for viral tests. Foremost, the 7th leaf was selected and the whole leaf was inoculated with the virus followed by a simple water to rinse for surface sterilization. Leaves were dried and coated with virus inoculums for further analysis. Measurements were made on every second day for chlorophyll content. To determine chlorophyll content, the leaf samples were separated from plant and weighted accurately followed by putting it into 5 mL of 80% acetone at a temperature of 4°C. The dark extraction was performed overnight. The chlorophyll contents of tobacco leaves extracted over night are placed in a 1 cm thick cuvette with 80% of acetone as blank. The UV-Visible spectrometer was employed to measure absorbance of chlorophyll content at 645 nm and 663 nm to evaluate the Chl-a + Chl-b concentrations using the following formula.Chl-a =12.7A663-2.69A645; Chl-b = 22.7A645  −4.68A663.Total chlorophyll content Chl-a + Chl-b = [20.2A645  ±  8.02A663]V×W/1000.In the above formula, A645 and A663 are the absorbance values at the corresponding wave lengths, “V” is the volume of extraction and “W” is the weight of fresh leaf. Finally, chlorophyll content is expressed in mg·g−1FW.


### 2.2.2. Antimicrobial Activity

(1) Antibacterial Activity. Disc diffusion method [25, 26] was employed to screen the significant antibacterial activity of the synthesized urea and thiourea derivatives 8(a–j) against different bacteria such as Streptococcus aureus (ATCC-25923), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC-25619), and Escherichia coli (ATCC-9637). Ciprofloxacin was used as a standard drug for antibacterial studies. A standard inoculums of 1-2 × 10−7 c.f.u/mL (0.5 McFarland standards) was introduced on to the surface of sterile agar plates, and a sterile glass spreader was used for even distribution of the inoculums. Discs measuring 6 mm in diameter were prepared from Whatman No. 1 filter paper and sterilized by dry heat at 140°C for an hour. The dry sterilized discs soaked in a known concentration (200 μg/mL) of the test compounds were placed in nutrient agar medium. Blank test showed that DMSO used in the preparation of the test solutions does not affect the bacteria. The plates after inoculation were inverted and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. The zone of inhibition around the disc which was calculated edge to edge zone of the confluent growth usually corresponds to the sharpest edge of the zone and was measured in millimeters. All tests were repeated three times and average data was taken as final result. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were also determined by microbroth dilution technique [27–29]. Specifically 0.1 mL of standardized inoculum (1-2 × 107 c.f.u/mL) was added to test tubes and incubated for 24 h at 37°C and two controls were maintained for each test sample. The growth was monitored visually and spectrophotometrically. The lowest concentration (highest dilution) required to arrest the growth of bacteria was regarded as minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).(2) Antifungal Activity. The antifungal activity of the titled urea and thiourea derivatives 8(a–j) were screened against fungal strains such as Aspergillus flavus (MTCC-1884), Aspergillus niger (MTCC-1881), and Candida albicans (ATCC- 2091) using agar disc-diffusion method [27–29]. The fungal strains were maintained on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium (Hi-Media). A loop full of culture from the slant was inoculated into the Potato Dextrose broth and incubated at 37°C for 48–72 h. This culture (0.1 mL) was spread on the potato dextrose agar plate and a sterile glass spreader was used for even distribution of the inoculums. All the compounds were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Sterile discs of Whatman No. 1 filter paper of about 6 mm diameter were dried and soaked in 200 μg/mL concentration of the test samples. The soaked discs were impregnated on the surface of the media and incubated for 48–72 h at 37°C. Blank test showed that DMSO used in the preparations of the test solutions does not affect the test fungi. The zone of inhibition around the disc was the calculated edge to edge zone of the confluent growth which usually corresponds to the sharpest edge of the zone and was measured in millimeters. All tests were repeated three times and average data was taken as final result. Fluconazole was used as a standard drug for antifungal study. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of the tested samples was determined by micro-broth-dilution method [27–29]. Specifically 0.1 mL of standardized inoculum (1-2 × 107 c.f.u/mL) was added to each test tube. The tubes were incubated aerobically at 37°C for 48–72 h. Control was maintained for each test sample. The lowest concentrations (highest dilution) of test compound that produced no visible signs of fungal growth (no turbidity) when compared with the control tubes were regarded as MICs.


## 2.2.1. Anti-TMV Activity

(1) Purification of the Virus. Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) is one of the most studied plant virus and it is a major challenge for researchers to control it since it represents a major threat in the production of the cash crops like tobacco. Based on the literature reports on the thiourea and urea derivatives antiviral activity [12], the synthesized compounds 8(a–j) were screened for their antiviral activity against TMV.Anti-TMV activity was evaluated by using Gooding’s method [23]. The upper leaves of Nicotiana tabacum L. were inoculated with tobacco mosaic virus, selected and ground in phosphate buffer, and then filtered through a double-layer pledget. The filtrate was centrifuged at 10000 g bybeing treated twice with polyethylene glycol (PEG) and centrifuged again. The whole experiment was carried out at 4°C. Absorbance of sample was measured at 260 nm using ultraviolet spectrophotometer. The concentration of virus was calculated by using the following formula:
(1)Virusconcn=(A260×dilutionratio)E1cm0.1%,260nm.(2) In Vivo Antiviral ActivityProtective Effect. The compound solutions were smeared on the left side, whereas the solvent served as the control on the right side of the growing N. tabacum L. leaves of the same age. The leaves were then inoculated with the virus of 6 × 10−3 mg/mL after 12 h, which were previously scattered with silicon carbide. The leaves were then washed with water and rubbed softly along the nervature twice. The local lesions appearing after inoculation of 3-4 days were counted. The inhibition rate of the tested samples was calculated according to the following formula. The experiments were repeated in triplicated and average values were taken as a final result as follows:
(2)Inhibitionrate%=[x-yx]×100.
Here, x = av is the number of local lesions in control, y = av is the number of local lesions in tested sample. (av denotes average and control was not treated with compounds).Inactivation Effect. The virus was inhibited by mixing with the compound solutions at the same volume for 30 min. The mixture was then inoculated on the left side of the N. tabacum L. leaves and the right side of the leaves was inoculated with the mixture of solvent and the virus alone. The leaves were then washed with water and rubbed softly along the nervature twice. The local lesions appearing after inoculation of 3-4 days were counted. The inhibition rate of the tested samples was calculated according to the following formula. The experiments were repeated in triplicated and average values were taken as a final result as follows:
(3)Inhibitionrate%=[x-yx]×100.
Here, x = av is the number of local lesions in control, y = av no. is the number of local lesions in tested sample. (av denotes average and control was not treated with compounds).Curative Effect. The same aged growing N. tabacum L. leaves were selected. The concentration of TMV, 6 × 10−3 mg/mL was dipped and inoculated on the whole leaves. Then, the leaves were washed with water and air dried for a few seconds. The compound solution was smeared on the left side and the solvent was smeared on the right side for control. After 3-4 days of inoculation, the local lesions number was then counted and recorded. The experiment was repeated three times with each tested sample. The inhibition rate of the tested samples was calculated according to the following formula (av denotes average and control was not treated with compounds):
(4)Inhibitionrate%=[x-yx]×100.
Here, x = av is the number of local lesions in control, y = av is the number of local lesions in tested sample.(3) Change in Chlorophyll Content of TMV Inoculated Tobacco Leaves after Treatment [24]. The same age growing and healthy tobacco plant leaves were selected for viral tests. Foremost, the 7th leaf was selected and the whole leaf was inoculated with the virus followed by a simple water to rinse for surface sterilization. Leaves were dried and coated with virus inoculums for further analysis. Measurements were made on every second day for chlorophyll content. To determine chlorophyll content, the leaf samples were separated from plant and weighted accurately followed by putting it into 5 mL of 80% acetone at a temperature of 4°C. The dark extraction was performed overnight. The chlorophyll contents of tobacco leaves extracted over night are placed in a 1 cm thick cuvette with 80% of acetone as blank. The UV-Visible spectrometer was employed to measure absorbance of chlorophyll content at 645 nm and 663 nm to evaluate the Chl-a + Chl-b concentrations using the following formula.Chl-a =12.7A663-2.69A645; Chl-b = 22.7A645  −4.68A663.Total chlorophyll content Chl-a + Chl-b = [20.2A645  ±  8.02A663]V×W/1000.In the above formula, A645 and A663 are the absorbance values at the corresponding wave lengths, “V” is the volume of extraction and “W” is the weight of fresh leaf. Finally, chlorophyll content is expressed in mg·g−1FW.


## 2.2.2. Antimicrobial Activity

(1) Antibacterial Activity. Disc diffusion method [25, 26] was employed to screen the significant antibacterial activity of the synthesized urea and thiourea derivatives 8(a–j) against different bacteria such as Streptococcus aureus (ATCC-25923), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC-25619), and Escherichia coli (ATCC-9637). Ciprofloxacin was used as a standard drug for antibacterial studies. A standard inoculums of 1-2 × 10−7 c.f.u/mL (0.5 McFarland standards) was introduced on to the surface of sterile agar plates, and a sterile glass spreader was used for even distribution of the inoculums. Discs measuring 6 mm in diameter were prepared from Whatman No. 1 filter paper and sterilized by dry heat at 140°C for an hour. The dry sterilized discs soaked in a known concentration (200 μg/mL) of the test compounds were placed in nutrient agar medium. Blank test showed that DMSO used in the preparation of the test solutions does not affect the bacteria. The plates after inoculation were inverted and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. The zone of inhibition around the disc which was calculated edge to edge zone of the confluent growth usually corresponds to the sharpest edge of the zone and was measured in millimeters. All tests were repeated three times and average data was taken as final result. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were also determined by microbroth dilution technique [27–29]. Specifically 0.1 mL of standardized inoculum (1-2 × 107 c.f.u/mL) was added to test tubes and incubated for 24 h at 37°C and two controls were maintained for each test sample. The growth was monitored visually and spectrophotometrically. The lowest concentration (highest dilution) required to arrest the growth of bacteria was regarded as minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).(2) Antifungal Activity. The antifungal activity of the titled urea and thiourea derivatives 8(a–j) were screened against fungal strains such as Aspergillus flavus (MTCC-1884), Aspergillus niger (MTCC-1881), and Candida albicans (ATCC- 2091) using agar disc-diffusion method [27–29]. The fungal strains were maintained on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium (Hi-Media). A loop full of culture from the slant was inoculated into the Potato Dextrose broth and incubated at 37°C for 48–72 h. This culture (0.1 mL) was spread on the potato dextrose agar plate and a sterile glass spreader was used for even distribution of the inoculums. All the compounds were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Sterile discs of Whatman No. 1 filter paper of about 6 mm diameter were dried and soaked in 200 μg/mL concentration of the test samples. The soaked discs were impregnated on the surface of the media and incubated for 48–72 h at 37°C. Blank test showed that DMSO used in the preparations of the test solutions does not affect the test fungi. The zone of inhibition around the disc was the calculated edge to edge zone of the confluent growth which usually corresponds to the sharpest edge of the zone and was measured in millimeters. All tests were repeated three times and average data was taken as final result. Fluconazole was used as a standard drug for antifungal study. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of the tested samples was determined by micro-broth-dilution method [27–29]. Specifically 0.1 mL of standardized inoculum (1-2 × 107 c.f.u/mL) was added to each test tube. The tubes were incubated aerobically at 37°C for 48–72 h. Control was maintained for each test sample. The lowest concentrations (highest dilution) of test compound that produced no visible signs of fungal growth (no turbidity) when compared with the control tubes were regarded as MICs.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Chemistry

The synthesis of urea8(a–e) and thiourea 8(f–j) derivatives of piperazine tagged with febuxostat was accomplished. An intermediate, 2-isobutoxy-5-(4-methyl-2-(piperazine-1-carbonyl)thiazol-5-yl)benzonitrile (4) (Scheme 1) was synthesized according to two methods.Scheme 1
Synthesis of urea and thiourea derivatives of piperazine tagged with febuxostat.Primarily, we were attempting to synthesize key intermediate4 by reacting piperazine with 5-(3-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-2-carbonyl chloride (5), which was obtained by the conversion of carboxylic acid group in febuxostat (3) into acid chloride in the presence of thionyl chloride at 0°C. This reaction afforded 59% of the desired key intermediate 4along with 34% of dimerized product, 5,5′-(2,2′-(piperazine-1,4-diylbis(oxomethylene))bis(4-methylthiazole-5,2-diyl))bis(2-isobutoxybenzonitrile) (6). Also, the same model reaction was attempted at −15°C to improve the yield of the desired product 4. Little enhancement in the yield of compound 4 (68%) was observed. Later, another method was adopted to prevent the formation of dimerized product; the carboxylic acid group in febuxostat was condensed with piperazine in DCM in the presence of T3P (propylphosphonic anhydride) at room temperature with vigorous stirring. The reaction provided a high yield of 94% desired key intermediate 4 with simple work-up procedure such as filtration and recrystallization from methanol. Finally, title urea and thiourea derivatives 8(a–j) were achieved in high yields through the reaction of intermediate 4 with various pharmacologically active functionalized phenyl isocyanates 7(a–e) and phenyl isothiocyanates 7(f–j) in tetrahydrofuran (THF) using N, N-dimethylpiperazine as a base. It was also observed that isocyanates and isothiocyanates containing electron-withdrawing functionalities (8c, 8d,8g, and8i) gave good yields in comparison with substrates bearing donating functional groups (8b and 8f). The synthesized compounds were reported for the first time as per the literature knowledge. The physical characteristics of the title compounds are represented in Table 1.Table 1
Physical data of titled urea and thiourea derivatives8(a–j).
Compound
Product
Reaction time (h)
Yield (%)
m.p (°C)
4
8
94
154–156
8a
3
85
182–184
8b
4
81
163–165
8c
2.5
89
176–178
8d
2.5
90
181–183
8e
3
86
201–203
8f
3
83
167–169
8g
2.5
86
171–173
8h
3
83
188–190
8i
3.5
83
214–216
8j
4
82
142–144The structures of the newly synthesized compounds8(a–j) were characterized by IR, 1H/13C NMR, mass spectral data, and elemental analysis. IR spectrum of compound 4 displayed strong absorption band at 3324 cm−1 for –NH (str) of piperazine, and the disappearance of the absorption band for –OH stretching of –COOH in febuxostat  at 3418 cm−1 indicated the formation of intermediate compound, 2-isobutoxy-5-(4-methyl-2-(piperazine-1-carbonyl)thiazol-5-yl)benzonitrile (4). The appearance of the bands in all IR spectra of synthesized compounds in the region of 1720–1640 for (–C=O), and 1660–1590 (–C=S) indicated the formation of titled urea and thiourea derivatives 8(a–j), respectively. In 1H-NMR spectrum of the compound 4, the chemical shift at δ2.85 is assigned to –NH proton of intermediate 4, and the disappearance of chemical shift value at δ11.3 of –COOH in febuxostat indicated the formation of intermediate 4. Chemical shift values in the regions 8.15–10.98 ppm and 6.82–8.78 ppm are assigned to protons of –NH in urea/thiourea derivatives and aromatic protons, respectively. 13C-NMR spectra gave signals in the regions 154.4–168.3 ppm and 158.4–179.9 ppm for –C=O and–C=S, respectively. The appearance of the molecular ion peaks in the mass spectra and the correlated composition of tested compounds in elemental analysis with calculated composition have given further evidence for the characterization of the synthesized compounds. The spectral data of titled compounds are presented in the experimental part.


### 3.2. Biological Activity

Antiviral activity of title compounds8(a–j) was screened against Tobacco mosaic virus and the results are given in Tables 2 and 3 and Figure 2. The results of in vivo inactivation rate, protective effect, and curative effects of the urea and thiourea derivatives 8(a–j) against TMV are presented in Table 2. All the title compounds exhibited potent to moderate inhibition activity against TMV. The 4-nitrophenyl urea substituted compound 8d and 3-bromophenyl thiourea substituted compound 8f showed high inactivation of infection, that is, inhibition rate of 8d and 8fare 85.72±0.33 and 85.93±0.54, respectively. In in vivo, for 8d and 8f, infection protective effects are 58.72±1.18 and 58.29±0.76 and infection curative effects are 57.34±0.82 and 56.31±0.97, respectively. The Extent of viral infection in plants leads to proliferation expansion and destruction of the chloroplast, and these factors retarding the production of chlorophyll, subsequently causing leaf chlorosis and mosaic. It reduces the photosynthetic pigment in TMV infected leaves. The host’s resistance of TMV infected leaves is enhanced when these leaves were treated with antiviral agents. Furthermore, the efficacy of the potent titled compounds 8d, 8f on the chlorophyll content in tobacco was examined and results are tabulated in Table 3 and Figure 2. The biological data revealed that the chlorophyll content in virus inoculated tobacco leaves was increased during 1–5 days and reached the highest value on the 5th day when these leaves are sprayed with potent synthesized compounds 8d and 8f. Among them, compound 8f exhibited better effectiveness and 8d showed less potency when compared with the standard, Nignanmycin. The compounds 8d and 8f significantly enhanced the chlorophyll content, indicating the demolish of virus of the tobacco and enhancing hosts resistance towards diseases.Table 2
The inhibitory activity of the titled urea and thiourea derivatives8(a–j) on TMV.
Compounda
Inactivation rate (%) ± SD
Protective effect (%) ± SD
Curative effect (%) ± SD
4
57.54
±
0.18
39.82
±
0.97
36.02
±
0.72
8a
74.41
±
0.56
41.24
±
0.76
52.73
±
1.43
8b
72.55
±
0.74
40.57
±
1.28
49.75
±
0.76
8c
78.43
±
1.01
52.31
±
0.84
51.28
±
0.69
8d
85.72
±
0.33
58.72
±
1.18
57.34
±
0.82
8e
65.28
±
0.97
39.86
±
0.49
49.28
±
0.86
8f
85.93
±
0.54
58.29
±
0.76
56.31
±
0.97
8g
64.56
±
1.27
45.53
±
0.86
48.29
±
1.08
8h
81.33
±
0.79
58.88
±
0.78
56.03
±
1.10
8i
72.74
±
0.48
50.73
±
1.25
42.49
±
0.92
8j
63.26
±
0.98
47.96
±
0.44
46.23
±
0.75
Stand
88.45
±
0.68
59.62
±
0.74
57.27
±
0.54
aThe title compounds tested at 500 µg/L.
Stand: Ningnanmycin, SD: standard deviation.Table 3
Change in chlorophyll content (mg·g−1 FW) in the tobacco leaves after treatment with 8d and 8f.
Duration of incubationb (days)
Control
TMV
TMV + N
TMV +8d
TMV +8f
1
75
85
120
98
110
2
85
95
105
128
138
3
115
135
198
145
172
4
110
120
220
185
205
5
135
140
241
225
244
bIncubation period in days, TMV: Tobacco mosaic virus, N: Ningnanmycin.Figure 2
Change in the chlorophyll content in the tobacco leaves after treatment with8d and 8f.The title compounds were screened againstS. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli bacterial strains and against A. flavus, A. niger, and C. albicans fungal strains using disc-diffusion method. The minimum inhibitory concentration of the tested samples was also examined and the results are presented in Table 4. Groups like 4-fluorophenyl in 8a, 4-nitrophenyl in 8d of urea derivatives, and 3-bromophenyl in 8f, 2,4-dichlorophenyl in 8j of thiourea derivatives might be responsible for potent antimicrobial activity. Compound 8e exhibited potent activity against P. aeruginosa. Compound 8fhas the lowest MIC value (15) against S. aureus.Table 4
Antimicrobial activity of the titled urea and thiourea derivatives8(a–j).
Compd.
Bacterial culture
Fungal culture
S. aureus
P. aeruginosa
E. coli
A. flavus
A. niger
C. albicans
ZOIc
MIC
ZOIa
MIC
ZOIa
MIC
ZOIa
MIC
ZOIa
MIC
ZOIa
MIC
4
14.9
60
13.4
65
12.7
50
10.9
65
10.5
65
11.3
45
8a
20.8
17
19.9
20
23.8
17
18.6
30
19.3
30
18.8
35
8b
16.3
40
19.2
30
17.3
45
13.8
80
13.7
80
16.3
40
8c
17.1
18
18.5
45
17.6
55
14.3
80
14.4
75
14.5
55
8d
19.8
20
20.5
20
24.7
15
19.9
20
19.6
30
19.8
20
8e
18.9
30
20.8
20
19.4
35
17.5
45
16.8
65
17.7
30
8f
20.1
15
19.8
25
20.5
30
19.2
20
20.1
20
19.3
25
8g
17.8
45
17.3
35
18.3
70
16.4
50
17.8
40
16.4
30
8h
16.1
40
16.2
35
15.2
70
13.9
80
14.5
70
13.8
80
8i
16.7
30
18.8
40
17.9
45
16.1
45
18.3
35
15.9
70
8j
19.7
25
20.8
20
22.8
20
19.0
25
19.6
25
19.7
20
Ciprofloxacin
22
04
23
05
27
04
—
—
—
—
—
—
Fluconazole
—
—
—
—
—
—
21
04
23
04
22
05
ZOI: zone of inhibition in mm.
cConcentration of compounds at 200 µg/mL.All the compounds exhibited potent to moderate inhibitory activities against viral, bacterial, and fungal organisms. Especially the compounds8a, 8d, 8f, and 8j exhibited good results against the above organisms at lower concentration when compared with other compounds.


## 3.1. Chemistry

The synthesis of urea8(a–e) and thiourea 8(f–j) derivatives of piperazine tagged with febuxostat was accomplished. An intermediate, 2-isobutoxy-5-(4-methyl-2-(piperazine-1-carbonyl)thiazol-5-yl)benzonitrile (4) (Scheme 1) was synthesized according to two methods.Scheme 1
Synthesis of urea and thiourea derivatives of piperazine tagged with febuxostat.Primarily, we were attempting to synthesize key intermediate4 by reacting piperazine with 5-(3-isobutoxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-2-carbonyl chloride (5), which was obtained by the conversion of carboxylic acid group in febuxostat (3) into acid chloride in the presence of thionyl chloride at 0°C. This reaction afforded 59% of the desired key intermediate 4along with 34% of dimerized product, 5,5′-(2,2′-(piperazine-1,4-diylbis(oxomethylene))bis(4-methylthiazole-5,2-diyl))bis(2-isobutoxybenzonitrile) (6). Also, the same model reaction was attempted at −15°C to improve the yield of the desired product 4. Little enhancement in the yield of compound 4 (68%) was observed. Later, another method was adopted to prevent the formation of dimerized product; the carboxylic acid group in febuxostat was condensed with piperazine in DCM in the presence of T3P (propylphosphonic anhydride) at room temperature with vigorous stirring. The reaction provided a high yield of 94% desired key intermediate 4 with simple work-up procedure such as filtration and recrystallization from methanol. Finally, title urea and thiourea derivatives 8(a–j) were achieved in high yields through the reaction of intermediate 4 with various pharmacologically active functionalized phenyl isocyanates 7(a–e) and phenyl isothiocyanates 7(f–j) in tetrahydrofuran (THF) using N, N-dimethylpiperazine as a base. It was also observed that isocyanates and isothiocyanates containing electron-withdrawing functionalities (8c, 8d,8g, and8i) gave good yields in comparison with substrates bearing donating functional groups (8b and 8f). The synthesized compounds were reported for the first time as per the literature knowledge. The physical characteristics of the title compounds are represented in Table 1.Table 1
Physical data of titled urea and thiourea derivatives8(a–j).
Compound
Product
Reaction time (h)
Yield (%)
m.p (°C)
4
8
94
154–156
8a
3
85
182–184
8b
4
81
163–165
8c
2.5
89
176–178
8d
2.5
90
181–183
8e
3
86
201–203
8f
3
83
167–169
8g
2.5
86
171–173
8h
3
83
188–190
8i
3.5
83
214–216
8j
4
82
142–144The structures of the newly synthesized compounds8(a–j) were characterized by IR, 1H/13C NMR, mass spectral data, and elemental analysis. IR spectrum of compound 4 displayed strong absorption band at 3324 cm−1 for –NH (str) of piperazine, and the disappearance of the absorption band for –OH stretching of –COOH in febuxostat  at 3418 cm−1 indicated the formation of intermediate compound, 2-isobutoxy-5-(4-methyl-2-(piperazine-1-carbonyl)thiazol-5-yl)benzonitrile (4). The appearance of the bands in all IR spectra of synthesized compounds in the region of 1720–1640 for (–C=O), and 1660–1590 (–C=S) indicated the formation of titled urea and thiourea derivatives 8(a–j), respectively. In 1H-NMR spectrum of the compound 4, the chemical shift at δ2.85 is assigned to –NH proton of intermediate 4, and the disappearance of chemical shift value at δ11.3 of –COOH in febuxostat indicated the formation of intermediate 4. Chemical shift values in the regions 8.15–10.98 ppm and 6.82–8.78 ppm are assigned to protons of –NH in urea/thiourea derivatives and aromatic protons, respectively. 13C-NMR spectra gave signals in the regions 154.4–168.3 ppm and 158.4–179.9 ppm for –C=O and–C=S, respectively. The appearance of the molecular ion peaks in the mass spectra and the correlated composition of tested compounds in elemental analysis with calculated composition have given further evidence for the characterization of the synthesized compounds. The spectral data of titled compounds are presented in the experimental part.


## 3.2. Biological Activity

Antiviral activity of title compounds8(a–j) was screened against Tobacco mosaic virus and the results are given in Tables 2 and 3 and Figure 2. The results of in vivo inactivation rate, protective effect, and curative effects of the urea and thiourea derivatives 8(a–j) against TMV are presented in Table 2. All the title compounds exhibited potent to moderate inhibition activity against TMV. The 4-nitrophenyl urea substituted compound 8d and 3-bromophenyl thiourea substituted compound 8f showed high inactivation of infection, that is, inhibition rate of 8d and 8fare 85.72±0.33 and 85.93±0.54, respectively. In in vivo, for 8d and 8f, infection protective effects are 58.72±1.18 and 58.29±0.76 and infection curative effects are 57.34±0.82 and 56.31±0.97, respectively. The Extent of viral infection in plants leads to proliferation expansion and destruction of the chloroplast, and these factors retarding the production of chlorophyll, subsequently causing leaf chlorosis and mosaic. It reduces the photosynthetic pigment in TMV infected leaves. The host’s resistance of TMV infected leaves is enhanced when these leaves were treated with antiviral agents. Furthermore, the efficacy of the potent titled compounds 8d, 8f on the chlorophyll content in tobacco was examined and results are tabulated in Table 3 and Figure 2. The biological data revealed that the chlorophyll content in virus inoculated tobacco leaves was increased during 1–5 days and reached the highest value on the 5th day when these leaves are sprayed with potent synthesized compounds 8d and 8f. Among them, compound 8f exhibited better effectiveness and 8d showed less potency when compared with the standard, Nignanmycin. The compounds 8d and 8f significantly enhanced the chlorophyll content, indicating the demolish of virus of the tobacco and enhancing hosts resistance towards diseases.Table 2
The inhibitory activity of the titled urea and thiourea derivatives8(a–j) on TMV.
Compounda
Inactivation rate (%) ± SD
Protective effect (%) ± SD
Curative effect (%) ± SD
4
57.54
±
0.18
39.82
±
0.97
36.02
±
0.72
8a
74.41
±
0.56
41.24
±
0.76
52.73
±
1.43
8b
72.55
±
0.74
40.57
±
1.28
49.75
±
0.76
8c
78.43
±
1.01
52.31
±
0.84
51.28
±
0.69
8d
85.72
±
0.33
58.72
±
1.18
57.34
±
0.82
8e
65.28
±
0.97
39.86
±
0.49
49.28
±
0.86
8f
85.93
±
0.54
58.29
±
0.76
56.31
±
0.97
8g
64.56
±
1.27
45.53
±
0.86
48.29
±
1.08
8h
81.33
±
0.79
58.88
±
0.78
56.03
±
1.10
8i
72.74
±
0.48
50.73
±
1.25
42.49
±
0.92
8j
63.26
±
0.98
47.96
±
0.44
46.23
±
0.75
Stand
88.45
±
0.68
59.62
±
0.74
57.27
±
0.54
aThe title compounds tested at 500 µg/L.
Stand: Ningnanmycin, SD: standard deviation.Table 3
Change in chlorophyll content (mg·g−1 FW) in the tobacco leaves after treatment with 8d and 8f.
Duration of incubationb (days)
Control
TMV
TMV + N
TMV +8d
TMV +8f
1
75
85
120
98
110
2
85
95
105
128
138
3
115
135
198
145
172
4
110
120
220
185
205
5
135
140
241
225
244
bIncubation period in days, TMV: Tobacco mosaic virus, N: Ningnanmycin.Figure 2
Change in the chlorophyll content in the tobacco leaves after treatment with8d and 8f.The title compounds were screened againstS. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli bacterial strains and against A. flavus, A. niger, and C. albicans fungal strains using disc-diffusion method. The minimum inhibitory concentration of the tested samples was also examined and the results are presented in Table 4. Groups like 4-fluorophenyl in 8a, 4-nitrophenyl in 8d of urea derivatives, and 3-bromophenyl in 8f, 2,4-dichlorophenyl in 8j of thiourea derivatives might be responsible for potent antimicrobial activity. Compound 8e exhibited potent activity against P. aeruginosa. Compound 8fhas the lowest MIC value (15) against S. aureus.Table 4
Antimicrobial activity of the titled urea and thiourea derivatives8(a–j).
Compd.
Bacterial culture
Fungal culture
S. aureus
P. aeruginosa
E. coli
A. flavus
A. niger
C. albicans
ZOIc
MIC
ZOIa
MIC
ZOIa
MIC
ZOIa
MIC
ZOIa
MIC
ZOIa
MIC
4
14.9
60
13.4
65
12.7
50
10.9
65
10.5
65
11.3
45
8a
20.8
17
19.9
20
23.8
17
18.6
30
19.3
30
18.8
35
8b
16.3
40
19.2
30
17.3
45
13.8
80
13.7
80
16.3
40
8c
17.1
18
18.5
45
17.6
55
14.3
80
14.4
75
14.5
55
8d
19.8
20
20.5
20
24.7
15
19.9
20
19.6
30
19.8
20
8e
18.9
30
20.8
20
19.4
35
17.5
45
16.8
65
17.7
30
8f
20.1
15
19.8
25
20.5
30
19.2
20
20.1
20
19.3
25
8g
17.8
45
17.3
35
18.3
70
16.4
50
17.8
40
16.4
30
8h
16.1
40
16.2
35
15.2
70
13.9
80
14.5
70
13.8
80
8i
16.7
30
18.8
40
17.9
45
16.1
45
18.3
35
15.9
70
8j
19.7
25
20.8
20
22.8
20
19.0
25
19.6
25
19.7
20
Ciprofloxacin
22
04
23
05
27
04
—
—
—
—
—
—
Fluconazole
—
—
—
—
—
—
21
04
23
04
22
05
ZOI: zone of inhibition in mm.
cConcentration of compounds at 200 µg/mL.All the compounds exhibited potent to moderate inhibitory activities against viral, bacterial, and fungal organisms. Especially the compounds8a, 8d, 8f, and 8j exhibited good results against the above organisms at lower concentration when compared with other compounds.


## 4. Conclusion

In conclusion, a series of new urea and thiourea derivatives of piperazine tagged with febuxostat drug was accomplished in high yields. In the development of the target molecules, the piperazine is effectively coupled with febuxostat in high yields in the presence of T3P reagent. The antiviral activity against TMV and antimicrobial activity of the titled compounds were evaluated. The compounds 8d (4-nitrophenyl urea substituted derivative) and 8f (3-bromophenyl thiourea substituted derivative) were found to be promising antiviral agents and compounds 8a (4-fluorophenyl urea substituted derivative) and 8j (2, 4-dichlorophenyl thiourea substituted derivative) exhibited good antimicrobial activity. With little exception, overall, it was observed that the titled compounds meritoriously worked as antiviral agents.



---

*Source: 682603-2013-12-26.xml*