# 6-[18F]Fluoro-L-DOPA: A Well-Established Neurotracer with Expanding Application Spectrum and Strongly Improved Radiosyntheses

Authors: M. Pretze; C. Wängler; B. Wängler
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

For many years, the main application of [18F]F-DOPA has been the PET imaging of neuropsychiatric diseases, movement disorders, and brain malignancies. Recent findings however point to very favorable results of this tracer for the imaging of other malignant diseases such as neuroendocrine tumors, pheochromocytoma, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma expanding its application spectrum.
With the application of this tracer in neuroendocrine tumor imaging, improved radiosyntheses have been developed. Among these,  the no-carrier-added nucleophilic introduction of fluorine-18, especially, has gained increasing attention as it gives [18F]F-DOPA in higher specific activities and shorter reaction times by less intricate synthesis protocols. The nucleophilic syntheses which were developed recently are able to provide [18F]F-DOPA by automated syntheses in very high specific activities, radiochemical yields, and enantiomeric purities.
This review summarizes the developments in the field of [18F]F-DOPA syntheses using electrophilic synthesis pathways as well as recent developments of nucleophilic syntheses of [18F]F-DOPA and compares the different synthesis strategies regarding the accessibility and applicability of the products for human in vivo PET tumor imaging.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The18F-radiolabeled nonproteinogenic amino acid 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[18F]fluoro-l-phenylalanine ([18F]F-DOPA) (Figure 1) has been used for over 30 years to image the presynaptic dopaminergic system in the human brain in order to investigate a number of CNS disorders, in particular schizophrenia [1, 2] and Parkinson’s disease with positron emission tomography (PET) [3, 4]. As DOPA is the precursor of the neurotransmitter dopamine, the extent of accumulation of [18F]F-DOPA in the brain reflects the functional integrity of the presynaptic dopaminergic synthesis [5] and visualizes the activity of aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (AADC), which converts [18F]F-DOPA to 18F-dopamine. Likewise, the [18F]F-DOPA uptake can also be relevant for determining the effects of treatment of the underlying pathophysiology. For example, its uptake in the striatum is increased during dopamine replacement therapies in Parkinson’s disease [6] and modulated by administration of dopamine D2 receptor antagonist-based antipsychotic compounds [7, 8]. As a diagnostic tool for the investigation of the neuronal dopaminergic metabolism, a high specific activity (SA) of [18F]F-DOPA is not mandatory.Figure 1
Selected radiotracers applicable in (brain-)tumor imaging.Incidental findings in a patient undergoing a movement disorder diagnosis resulted in a coincidental discovery of a malignant glioma, indicating the potential applicability of [18F]F-DOPA also for glioma imaging [9]. In the following, numerous studies were conducted establishing [18F]F-DOPA as the main diagnostic tool for brain tumor imaging giving more favorable diagnostic results than [18F]FDG [10] (Figure 1) due to a significantly lower background accumulation. Also other alternatives based on amino acids were developed for the imaging of brain malignancies such as [11C]methyl-l-methionine ([11C]CH3-MET) [11–13], 3′-deoxy-3′-l-[18F]fluorothymidine ([18F]FLT) [14, 15], or [18F]fluoroethyl-l-tyrosine ([18F]FET) [16–19] (Figure 1) which also exhibit the advantage to show a low physiological accumulation in normal cerebral tissue and inflamed lesions compared to [18F]FDG, thus giving more favorable results in brain tumor imaging. Among these tracers used for neurooncologic imaging, [18F]F-DOPA shows a high uptake in the malignant tissues, thus allowing a very sensitive tumor detection via PET imaging.Beyond glioma imaging, recent studies have also shown the increasing importance of [18F]F-DOPA for the visualization of various peripheral tumor entities via PET [20] which can be attributed to the upregulation of amino acid transporters in malignant tissues due to an often increased proliferation [21, 22]. [18F]F-DOPA, which is transported via the dopamine transporter (DAT) into cells, has thus shown diagnostic advantages in the imaging of high- and low-grade malignancies like neuroendocrine tumors [23–27], pheochromocytoma [28, 29], and pancreatic adenocarcinoma [30–32] regarding diagnostic efficiency and sensitivity. [18F]FDG on the contrary is taken up by the glucose transporter not only by malignant tissues but also by inflamed and healthy tissues exhibiting a high glucose metabolism, resulting in low tumor-to-background ratios [10] in CNS malignancies. The proliferation marker [18F]FLT which accumulates in malignant tissues due to an enhanced activity of TK1 however often shows relatively low tumor uptakes [15], favoring [18F]F-DOPA for the PET imaging of malignancies.Due to its increasing importance for human tumor imaging, the synthesis of [18F]F-DOPA becomes a critical measure regarding its dissemination in clinical routine. Ideally, the radiotracer should be easily accessible in high radiochemical yields (RCYs) and specific activities (SAs) as well as in short synthesis times by an automated process. Furthermore, as it was demonstrated thatd-amino acids lack a permeability through the blood-brain barrier, an enantioselective synthesis for [18F]F-DOPA is mandatory [33].The following review outlines the developments in the field of [18F]F-DOPA radiosyntheses via electrophilic synthesis routes and the more recent synthesis improvements via nucleophilic syntheses. The main focus of this work is to compare the radiochemical yields (RCYs), radiochemical purities (RCPs), enantiomeric excess (ee), synthesis times, reliability, and a potential for automation of the different radiosynthesis pathways.


## 2. Synthesis Routes for the Production of [18F]F-DOPA

### 2.1. First Attempts to Synthesize [18F]F-DOPA

One of the first fluorine-18-labeled DOPA derivatives was 5-[18F]F-DOPA [18F]4, synthesized via isotopic exchange by Firnau et al. in 1973 [34] (Figure 2). In a swimming pool reactor 6Li(n, 4He)3H and 16O(3H, n)18F nuclear reactions were utilized to produce fluorine-18 in a mixture of Li2CO3 in H2SO4 and H2O. The resulting [18F]fluoride was subsequently distilled twice and the diazonium fluoroborate precursor1 was added to this solution. After the isotopic exchange reaction has occurred, the water was removed and the residue was dried over P2O5. The dried residue [18F]2 was redissolved in dioxane, filtered, and heated to 80°C. After adding xylene, the solution was further heated to 132°C for the pyrolysis of the diazonium[18F]fluoroborate [18F]2 for 30 min. After solvent evaporation, HBr (48%) was added to hydrolyze [18F]3 to the final product 5-[18F]F-DOPA.Figure 2
Isotopic exchange reaction pathway for the synthesis of 5-[18F]F-DOPA [34].The resulting product [18F]4 was obtained in high radiochemical purities of >95% but very low specific activities between 2.2 and 22 kBq/μmol (0.2–2.0 μCi/mg). Furthermore, the enantiomeric purity of the product was not determined, limiting the applicability of this cumbersome synthesis route.A significant limitation for the use of 5-[18F]F-DOPA forin vivo imaging purposes is the acceleratedO-methylation of 5-[18F]F-DOPA in contrast to 6-[18F]F-DOPA ([18F]7, Figure 3). This increasedO-methylation rate is caused by the fluorine atom in position 5 in direct vicinity to the hydroxyl group in position 4 [35] and results in a significantly lowerin vivo stability of 5-[18F]F-DOPA ([18F]4, Figure 2). The same group presented the reaction of [18F]F2 andl-DOPA in liquid hydrogen fluoride in 1984, yielding a mixture of 2-, 5-, and 6-[18F]F-DOPA in low radiochemical yields: 3.7 GBq [18F]F2 was produced from a Ne-target by a tandem Van de Graaff accelerator to give 111 MBq (3%) 6-[18F]F-DOPA, limiting the applicability of this synthesis pathway for a routine production [36].Figure 3
Examples for different demetallation synthesis routes for production of carrier-added [18F]F-DOPA ([18F]7) via desilylation (A) [42], demercuration (B) [44], and destannylation (C) [95].


### 2.2. Electrophilic Syntheses

Twenty years ago, the main route to produce [18F]F2 for electrophilic fluorination reactions was to utilize the nuclear reaction 20Ne(d,α)18F and a F2-passivated Ni-target [37]. However, this reaction was limited to facilities with a deuterium accelerator and was thus mostly replaced by the 18O(p,n)18F nuclear reaction using a respective 18O gas target as this latter method enables the production of higher 18F activities [37–39].To overcome the problem with regioselectivity [40, 41] and the low radiochemical yields obtained by isotopic exchange reactions, radiodemetallation reactions were proposed by several groups. Thus, desilylation [42] and demercuration [43–46] as well as destannylation [47–52] reactions were developed (Figure 3), of which demercuration and destannylation gave the best results and were also adopted to the automated routine production of [18F]F-DOPA [53]. Table 1 compares some of the most promising approaches. Multiple purification steps utilizing cartridges, HPLC, and sterile membrane filters were used to remove traces of toxic metal contaminations in the final product solutions to obtain the radiolabeled products in acceptable purities. Nevertheless, using demetallation reactions in a clinical radiotracer production, the final quality control has to include a test for metal contaminants.Table 1
Selected synthesis details from electrophilic fluorination reactions for the synthesis of[18F]F-DOPA.
Radiolabeling method
Time [min]
RCY[%]a
Impurities in product
SA [MBq/μmol]
ee [%]
Citation
Desilylation
60
8b
n. d.
25.2
100
Diksic and Farrokhzad ’85 [42]
L-DOPA + BF3
120
18
n. d.
n. d.
100
Chirakal et al. ’86 [92]
Demercuration
65
12
<10 ppb Hg
n. d.
97
Adam and Jivan ’88 [43]
Demercuration
50
11
<20 ppb Hg
2.6
>99
Luxen et al. ’90 [44]
Destannylation
60
25
<15 ppb Sn
n. d.
>99
Namavari et al. ’92 [47]
O-Pivaloyl ester of L-DOPA
60
17 ± 1.9
n. d.
17 ± 2.5
100
Ishiwata et al. ’93 [93]
Demercuration
45–50
14b
<0.05μg/mL Hg
17–19
>98
Chaly et al. ’93 [94]
Destannylation
45–50
26
1.5–2.5 ppm Sn
4.4
>99
Dollé et al. ’98 [48]
Destannylation
50
25 ± 3
<1μg/mL CDCl3
30 ± 2
96 ± 1
Füchtner et al. ’08 [95]
aUnless otherwise stated, RCYs are given decay corrected (d. c.) and bnondecay corrected (n. d. c.).Utilizing the carrier-added electrophilic introduction of fluorine-18, the main route to synthesize [18F]F-DOPA ([18F]7) is by using commercially available and enantiomerically pure mercury or stannyl precursors such as8 or10 (Figure 3) in combination with automated synthesis modules [53, 54]. The main advantages are a high enantiomeric purity (ee >99%), short reaction times (about 50 min), and a simplified synthesis setup [54]. However, remaining limitations are the achievable radiochemical yields (25 ± 3%; 0.6–2.6 GBq due to the low production yields of [18F]F2 from the cyclotron and the substantial loss of at least 50% of activity) and specific activities (4–25 MBq/μmol). As [18F]F2 can normally be obtained in specific activities of up to 350–600 MBq/μmol [55], the [18F]F-DOPA production is not possible in high specific activities by the electrophilic method. Another limitation is the cumbersome transport of gaseous [18F]F2. Further, the preparation of the precursor compounds is expensive and the radiofluorination of the stannyl precursors gives many side products. In order to obtain [18F]F-DOPA in higher SAs and RCYs, it was thus mandatory to develop another synthesis approach. The most promising one is the nucleophilic labeling using no-carrier-added [18F]fluoride as it can be obtained in very high specific activities of up to 314–43,000 GBq/μmol [56].


## 2.1. First Attempts to Synthesize [18F]F-DOPA

One of the first fluorine-18-labeled DOPA derivatives was 5-[18F]F-DOPA [18F]4, synthesized via isotopic exchange by Firnau et al. in 1973 [34] (Figure 2). In a swimming pool reactor 6Li(n, 4He)3H and 16O(3H, n)18F nuclear reactions were utilized to produce fluorine-18 in a mixture of Li2CO3 in H2SO4 and H2O. The resulting [18F]fluoride was subsequently distilled twice and the diazonium fluoroborate precursor1 was added to this solution. After the isotopic exchange reaction has occurred, the water was removed and the residue was dried over P2O5. The dried residue [18F]2 was redissolved in dioxane, filtered, and heated to 80°C. After adding xylene, the solution was further heated to 132°C for the pyrolysis of the diazonium[18F]fluoroborate [18F]2 for 30 min. After solvent evaporation, HBr (48%) was added to hydrolyze [18F]3 to the final product 5-[18F]F-DOPA.Figure 2
Isotopic exchange reaction pathway for the synthesis of 5-[18F]F-DOPA [34].The resulting product [18F]4 was obtained in high radiochemical purities of >95% but very low specific activities between 2.2 and 22 kBq/μmol (0.2–2.0 μCi/mg). Furthermore, the enantiomeric purity of the product was not determined, limiting the applicability of this cumbersome synthesis route.A significant limitation for the use of 5-[18F]F-DOPA forin vivo imaging purposes is the acceleratedO-methylation of 5-[18F]F-DOPA in contrast to 6-[18F]F-DOPA ([18F]7, Figure 3). This increasedO-methylation rate is caused by the fluorine atom in position 5 in direct vicinity to the hydroxyl group in position 4 [35] and results in a significantly lowerin vivo stability of 5-[18F]F-DOPA ([18F]4, Figure 2). The same group presented the reaction of [18F]F2 andl-DOPA in liquid hydrogen fluoride in 1984, yielding a mixture of 2-, 5-, and 6-[18F]F-DOPA in low radiochemical yields: 3.7 GBq [18F]F2 was produced from a Ne-target by a tandem Van de Graaff accelerator to give 111 MBq (3%) 6-[18F]F-DOPA, limiting the applicability of this synthesis pathway for a routine production [36].Figure 3
Examples for different demetallation synthesis routes for production of carrier-added [18F]F-DOPA ([18F]7) via desilylation (A) [42], demercuration (B) [44], and destannylation (C) [95].


## 2.2. Electrophilic Syntheses

Twenty years ago, the main route to produce [18F]F2 for electrophilic fluorination reactions was to utilize the nuclear reaction 20Ne(d,α)18F and a F2-passivated Ni-target [37]. However, this reaction was limited to facilities with a deuterium accelerator and was thus mostly replaced by the 18O(p,n)18F nuclear reaction using a respective 18O gas target as this latter method enables the production of higher 18F activities [37–39].To overcome the problem with regioselectivity [40, 41] and the low radiochemical yields obtained by isotopic exchange reactions, radiodemetallation reactions were proposed by several groups. Thus, desilylation [42] and demercuration [43–46] as well as destannylation [47–52] reactions were developed (Figure 3), of which demercuration and destannylation gave the best results and were also adopted to the automated routine production of [18F]F-DOPA [53]. Table 1 compares some of the most promising approaches. Multiple purification steps utilizing cartridges, HPLC, and sterile membrane filters were used to remove traces of toxic metal contaminations in the final product solutions to obtain the radiolabeled products in acceptable purities. Nevertheless, using demetallation reactions in a clinical radiotracer production, the final quality control has to include a test for metal contaminants.Table 1
Selected synthesis details from electrophilic fluorination reactions for the synthesis of[18F]F-DOPA.
Radiolabeling method
Time [min]
RCY[%]a
Impurities in product
SA [MBq/μmol]
ee [%]
Citation
Desilylation
60
8b
n. d.
25.2
100
Diksic and Farrokhzad ’85 [42]
L-DOPA + BF3
120
18
n. d.
n. d.
100
Chirakal et al. ’86 [92]
Demercuration
65
12
<10 ppb Hg
n. d.
97
Adam and Jivan ’88 [43]
Demercuration
50
11
<20 ppb Hg
2.6
>99
Luxen et al. ’90 [44]
Destannylation
60
25
<15 ppb Sn
n. d.
>99
Namavari et al. ’92 [47]
O-Pivaloyl ester of L-DOPA
60
17 ± 1.9
n. d.
17 ± 2.5
100
Ishiwata et al. ’93 [93]
Demercuration
45–50
14b
<0.05μg/mL Hg
17–19
>98
Chaly et al. ’93 [94]
Destannylation
45–50
26
1.5–2.5 ppm Sn
4.4
>99
Dollé et al. ’98 [48]
Destannylation
50
25 ± 3
<1μg/mL CDCl3
30 ± 2
96 ± 1
Füchtner et al. ’08 [95]
aUnless otherwise stated, RCYs are given decay corrected (d. c.) and bnondecay corrected (n. d. c.).Utilizing the carrier-added electrophilic introduction of fluorine-18, the main route to synthesize [18F]F-DOPA ([18F]7) is by using commercially available and enantiomerically pure mercury or stannyl precursors such as8 or10 (Figure 3) in combination with automated synthesis modules [53, 54]. The main advantages are a high enantiomeric purity (ee >99%), short reaction times (about 50 min), and a simplified synthesis setup [54]. However, remaining limitations are the achievable radiochemical yields (25 ± 3%; 0.6–2.6 GBq due to the low production yields of [18F]F2 from the cyclotron and the substantial loss of at least 50% of activity) and specific activities (4–25 MBq/μmol). As [18F]F2 can normally be obtained in specific activities of up to 350–600 MBq/μmol [55], the [18F]F-DOPA production is not possible in high specific activities by the electrophilic method. Another limitation is the cumbersome transport of gaseous [18F]F2. Further, the preparation of the precursor compounds is expensive and the radiofluorination of the stannyl precursors gives many side products. In order to obtain [18F]F-DOPA in higher SAs and RCYs, it was thus mandatory to develop another synthesis approach. The most promising one is the nucleophilic labeling using no-carrier-added [18F]fluoride as it can be obtained in very high specific activities of up to 314–43,000 GBq/μmol [56].


## 3. Nucleophilic Synthesis Strategies for the Production of [18F]F-DOPA

As a tracer for the amino acid metabolism in brain malignancies, a high specific activity is not mandatory for [18F]F-DOPA. However, the increasing importance of [18F]F-DOPA for peripheral oncologic diagnosis and the need to produce the radiotracer in higher radiochemical yields and specific activities (as too low SAs of [18F]F-DOPA were shown to produce pharmacologic effects such as carcinoid crisis by local conversion in tumor tissue of [18F]F-DOPA to noradrenaline, induced by the enzymes aromatic acid decarboxylase and dopamine β-hydroxylase [57]) resulted in efforts to develop no-carrier-added nucleophilic labeling methods.


### 3.1. Isotopic Exchange

In 2001, Tierling et al. presented the first utilization of an isotopic exchange reaction for the synthesis of [18F]F-DOPA [58]. This approach yielded [18F]F-DOPA in RCYs of 8–10% (n. d. c.) and an ee of >85% within 70 min. Based on these results, Wagner et al. described the utilization of the isotopic exchange reaction for the radiofluorination of a 19F-precursor12 with tetrabutylammonium[18F]fluoride to produce [18F]F-DOPA in high specific activities (Figure 4) [59]. Specific activities in the range of 1.5–2.5 GBq/μmol and RCYs of 22% were calculated to be achievable from a theoretical starting activity of 100 GBq [18F]fluoride [60] and 19F-precursor amounts of 23 μmol. However, as the reaction was only shown for a starting activity of 370 MBq [18F]fluoride and 5.7 μmol 19F-precursor and no further isotopic exchange experiments with higher starting activities were demonstrated, the calculated achievable yields of up to 2.5 GBq/μmol remain to be shown.Figure 4
Isotopic exchange reaction for the synthesis of carrier-added [18F]F-DOPA [59].In 2013, Martin et al. implemented the method of Wagner et al. to a GE TRACERlab MXFDG. In preliminary experiments, the automated synthesis of [18F]F-DOPA resulted in reproducible RCYs of 10–15% (n. d. c.), RCPs of >95%, and ee of >98% without giving other synthesis details such as reaction times and starting activities [61].


### 3.2. Nucleophilic Syntheses and Aspects of Automation

In nucleophilic substitution reactions on aromatic rings using [18F]fluoride, the standard leaving groups are mainly nitro- or trimethylammonium moieties (Figure 5) in combination with electron withdrawing groups such as –CO, –CN, and –NO2 to enable an efficient reaction. Further, halogen exchange reactions with substituted veratraldehyde (–Cl, –Br, and –F) were evaluated [62]. The first nucleophilic approaches for the synthesis of [18F]F-DOPA gave racemates ofd- andl-isomers of the tracer which were purified by chiral HPLC resulting in a significant loss of activity [63, 64].Figure 5
Most common precursors for no-carrier-added nucleophilic radiofluorination reactions producing [18F]F-DOPA.To overcome these problems, new radiosyntheses were developed based on enantiomerically pure chiral precursors or chiral auxiliaries [65–70]. The radiolabeling reactions using these precursors provide the product in moderate to good RCYs accompanied by a high enantiomeric excess of >96%. The most promising approach was published by Lemaire et al. giving [18F]F-DOPA in a RCY of 17–29% (d. c.) and a SA of >37 GBq/μmol [66]. In Table 2, selected syntheses using different enantiomerically pure chiral precursors or chiral auxiliaries are compared.Table 2
Selected synthesis parameters using chiral auxiliaries or precursors.
Precursor
Time [min]
RCY[%]  18F-label.
RCY[%]  overalla
SA [GBq/μmol]
ee [%]
Citation
16
100–110
51
12b
n. d.
n. d.
Ding et al. ’90 [63]
15 or 16
120
n. d.
5–10
n. d.
50 (rac.)
Lemaire et al. ’91 [65]
15
110
n. d.
5–10b
n. d.
83–96
Lemaire et al. ’93 [67]
15 or 16
120
20–35; ~50
3–5b
n. d.
>99
Reddy et al. ’93 [68]
15
90
45 ± 5
17–29
>37
>96
Lemaire et al. ’94 [66]
15 or 16
125
n. d.
4-5b
>74
98
Horti et al. ’95 [69]
15
85
~50
6–13b
>7.4
98
Najafi ’95 [70]
aUnless otherwise stated, RCYs are given decay corrected (d. c.) and bnondecay corrected (n. d. c.).In addition, asymmetric synthesis routes were developed for the radiosynthesis of [18F]F-DOPA with higher enantiomeric selectivity and higher RCYs comprising approaches with the precursors depicted in Figure 5 and enantioselective reactions utilizing different chiral phase-transfer catalysts (cPTC). The results from these asymmetric approaches are shown in Table 3.Table 3
Selected synthesis parameters utilizing chiral phase-transfer catalysts (cPTC) or asymmetric synthesis routes.
Precursor
Method
Time [min]
RCY[%] 18F-label.
RCY[%] overalla
SA[GBq/μmol]
ee[%]
Citation
15
Enzymatic
150
27
2
>200
>99
Kaneko et al. ’99 [77]
17
cPTC18c
110
n. d.
10–15b
74–185
95
Guillouet et al. ’01 [73]
17
cPTC18
80–85
10–40
7–15
n. d.
90
Zhang et al. ’02 [74]
16
Catalyst25d
120
53
16 ± 5
n. d.
96
Krasikova et al. ’04 [80]
17
cPTC18
100
40–50
25–30
n. d.
96
Lemaire et al. ’04 [78]
15
cPTC18
120
71
20 ± 4
>50
≥95
Shen et al. ’09 [83]
17
cPTC31e
63
50
36 ± 3
>750
>97
Libert et al. ’13 [86]
aUnless otherwise stated, RCYs are given decay corrected (d. c.) and bnondecay corrected (n. d. c.); csee Figure 6; dsee Figure 8; esee Figure 10.A very promising approach for the nucleophilic synthesis of [18F]F-DOPA yielding the product in high enantiomeric purities was the utilization of the chiral phase-transfer catalystO-ally-N-9-anthracenylmethyl-cinchonidinium bromide (18, Figure 6) described by Corey et al. in 1997 [71]. Based on the preliminary results of Lemaire et al. in 1999 [72] and Guillouet et al. in 2001 [73], Zhang et al. adopted the method in 2002 [74] and presented a promising synthesis route utilizing this cPTC18 for the enantioselective radiosynthesis of [18F]F-DOPA in RCYs of 7–15%, radiochemical purities of >99%, and an ee of 90% within 80–85 min synthesis time. However, special care has to be taken concerning the trimethylammonium veratraldehyde precursor17 which exhibits a limited stability upon storage of the precursor for more than six months at 0–4°C resulting in a decreasing RCY for the radiofluorination of17 from 40% to <10% [75].Figure 6
Chiral phase-transfer catalystO-ally-N-9-anthracenylmethyl-cinchonidinium bromide18.A limitation for this synthesis route is the achievable enantiomeric purities as, according to the European Pharmacopoeia monograph, the limit of the D-enantiomer in the final solution is 2% (ee 96%) [76]. Thus, the synthesis had to be further improved to comply with this limit. A promising approach was presented by Kaneko et al. in 1999 (Figure 7) [77]. The enzymatic reaction step was evaluated carefully and provided a conversion rate of 58% from [18F]fluorocatechol ([18F]21) to [18F]F-DOPA ([18F]7) under optimized conditions. Despite the efficient enzymatic conversion of [18F]F-catechol to the product, the overall RCY of [18F]F-DOPA that could be obtained was only 2.0% but resulted in the formation of the product in high SAs of >200 GBq/μmol within 150 min synthesis time. The enantiomeric excess was assumed to be 100% due to the enzymatic character of the reaction although being not confirmed.Figure 7
Synthesis pathway for the enzymatic preparation of [18F]F-DOPA according to Kaneko et al. [77].The automation of radiotracer syntheses is mandatory for their wide clinical distribution as an automated process gives the product in reproducible quality and limits the radiation exposure to the operating personnel, enabling high starting activities and thus the possibility to synthesize several patient doses in one radiosynthesis.Therefore, Lemaire et al. optimized the enantioselective reaction using the chiral phase-transfer catalysts18 and were able to obtain enantiomeric excesses of about 96% when performing the reaction in toluene at 0°C [78]. However, this reaction setup is difficult to realize in automated processes, due to cooling and heating steps in the same synthesis process. Thus, an optimized synthesis route was developed, preventing the use of diiodosilane. Aldehyde [18F]19 and its precursor17 (Figure 5) were trapped on a C18 cartridge, the precursor17 was removed with water from the solid support, and [18F]19 was reduced by aqueous NaBH4 and subsequently halogenated by HBr or HI on solid support, resulting in a synthesis setup that could be transferred to an automated synthesis module. Recently, this reaction setup was applied for the radiosynthesis and online conversion from aldehyde [18F]19 to different benzyl halides [79].Another very promising approach was presented in 2004 by Krasikova et al. [80]. An automated enantioselective radiosynthesis utilizing a novel substrate/catalyst pair, namely, NiPBPGly25 and (S)-NOBIN26 (Figure 8), was developed. In the key alkylation step, the electrophilic bromide [18F]2 reacts with the nickel complex25 in the presence of (S)-NOBIN to form the (S)-complex [18F]27. This enantioselective reaction step was accomplished at room temperature, which is favorable in terms of automation. Subsequently, the alkylation was quenched by HI or acetic acid before the solvent was removed in order to prevent racemization of the (S)-complex. Different purification steps were optimized to remove any potentially toxic substances present during the synthesis (Ni, Br, P, or B) which was confirmed by ICP-MS analysis of the final product. Using this method, [18F]F-DOPA was synthesized in an ee of 96% and RCYs of 16±5% [80] in a total synthesis time of 110–120 min. Although this approach seems to be promising, it has not found a widespread application so far which may be due to the laborious synthesis of the catalyst pair [81, 82] and the challenging purification procedures required for the synthesis which include self-made columns/cartridges in order to remove intermediate reagents and side products.Figure 8
Schematic depiction of the synthesis pathway utilizing NiPBPGly25 and (S)-NOBIN26 as a novel substrate/catalyst pair for the enantioselective radiosynthesis of [18F]F-DOPA by Krasikova et al. [80].The optimization efforts towards an automation for the routine production of [18F]F-DOPA finally resulted in promising synthesis approaches recently. In 2009, Shen et al. presented a method for the fully automated synthesis for [18F]F-DOPA [83] utilizing the cPTC18 which can be performed at ambient temperature (Figure 9), combining the methods described by Zhang et al. [74] and Lemaire et al. [78]. By optimization of the amounts of reagents during the alkylation process, they were able to obtain [18F]F-DOPA in RCYs of 20±4%, SAs of ~50 GBq/μmol, and ee of ≥95% within 120 min synthesis time. In order to obtain higher RCYs, it is important to radiolabel the nitro precursor15 in DMF instead of DMSO due to oxidation processes of the aldehyde15 occurring in DMSO [84, 85]. Furthermore, the utilization of HBr in combination with KI in the deprotection step resulted in higher RCYs compared to HI alone. However, as noncharacterized substances precipitate during the synthesis, a limitation of this method is the cumbersome maintenance of the synthesis module after each synthesis. To overcome this obstacle, the use of a cassette module would be favorable as this approach would not require the elaborate purification of the module after each use.Figure 9
Automated radiosynthesis procedure for [18F]F-DOPA using the chiral phase transfer catalyst18 [83].Libert and coworkers investigated different cPTC regarding their potential to produce [18F]F-DOPA in the highest enantiomeric excesses and high enantiomeric purities of >97% could be obtained under mild reaction conditions within short reaction times [86]. Together with the use of a structurally optimized chiral phase-transfer catalyst (31) [71, 87] (Figure 10), a much simplified synthesis setup for automation was enabled. With this optimization, the group of Libert and Lemaire was able to establish a fast automated synthesis and reported product amounts of >45 GBq obtained in RCYs of 24% (n. d. c.) and specific activities of >750 GBq/μmol [86] within 63 minutes (Figure 10). Furthermore, utilizing cPTC31 as the catalyst, an ee of >97% could be achieved.Figure 10
Schematic depiction of the automated synthesis pathway using the chiral phase-transfer catalyst31 [86].


### 3.3. Miscellaneous

In this chapter, some unconventional approaches for the production of [18F]F-DOPA are described.In 2008, Forsback et al. presented an electrophilic labeling approach for the production of [18F]F-DOPA in RCYs of 6.4±1.7% (d. c.) and SAs of 3.7±0.9 GBq/μmol [88]. The key step was the synthesis of [18F]F2 in an electrical discharge chamber by a 18F/19F-exchange reaction. The 18F-source was [18F]fluoromethane, which was mixed with a low amount (1 μmol) of carrier fluorine in neon (Ne/0.5% F2) inside the discharge chamber. [18F]Fluoromethane was produced from methyliodide by a nucleophilic substitution reaction with K[18F]F/K222 in acetonitrile. Deuterated solvents for the synthesis of [18F]F-DOPA like CDCl3, CD2Cl2, and C3D6O were also investigated providing significantly higher yields than Freon-11 [89].In 2012, Lee et al. presented a very fast oxidative fluorination approach for18F-aryl compounds utilizing a nickel-complex32 and [18F]fluoride (Figure 11). Nickel complex32 (1 mg), a hypervalent iodine oxidant33 (1 eq.), an aqueous solution of [18F]fluoride (2−5 μL, 3.7−18.5 MBq), and K222 (2.0 mg) in acetonitrile (200−500 μL) at 23°C yielded a Boc-protected [18F]F-DOPA-analogue [18F]34 in RCYs of 15±7% (n. d. c.) in less than 1 minute [90]. This might be also a useful approach for a very fast synthesis of [18F]F-DOPA.Figure 11
Schematic depiction of an oxidative fluorination approach using the nickel complex32 and a hypervalent iodine oxidant33 giving the Boc-protected [18F]F-DOPA-analogue[18F]34 [90].In 2013, Stenhagen et al. presented an Ag-mediated electrophilic [18F]fluorination of an enantiomerically pure precursor. The protected arylboronic ester was transformed to a 6-Ag-DOPA derivative with silver triflate. Next, [18F]selectfluor bis(triflate) in acetone-d6 was added. [18F]F-DOPA was obtained after 20 min reaction at ambient temperature and 5 min deprotection in RCYs of 19±12% and SAs of 2.6±0.3 GBq/μmol [91]. These results are comparable with the best known electrophilic approaches and could also serve for an automated synthesis.In summary, radiosynthesis procedures for [18F]F-DOPA were developed which can give the radiotracer in high RCYs, SAs, and enantiomeric excesses in short reaction times. Future efforts to even further improve these results could include the utilization of nonoxidizing solvents and microwave conditions in order to achieve even higher [18F]fluoride incorporation rates. Up to now, automated systems based on the radiochemistry described by, for example, Wagner et al. [59], Martin et al. [61], and Libert et al. [86] are commercially available.


## 3.1. Isotopic Exchange

In 2001, Tierling et al. presented the first utilization of an isotopic exchange reaction for the synthesis of [18F]F-DOPA [58]. This approach yielded [18F]F-DOPA in RCYs of 8–10% (n. d. c.) and an ee of >85% within 70 min. Based on these results, Wagner et al. described the utilization of the isotopic exchange reaction for the radiofluorination of a 19F-precursor12 with tetrabutylammonium[18F]fluoride to produce [18F]F-DOPA in high specific activities (Figure 4) [59]. Specific activities in the range of 1.5–2.5 GBq/μmol and RCYs of 22% were calculated to be achievable from a theoretical starting activity of 100 GBq [18F]fluoride [60] and 19F-precursor amounts of 23 μmol. However, as the reaction was only shown for a starting activity of 370 MBq [18F]fluoride and 5.7 μmol 19F-precursor and no further isotopic exchange experiments with higher starting activities were demonstrated, the calculated achievable yields of up to 2.5 GBq/μmol remain to be shown.Figure 4
Isotopic exchange reaction for the synthesis of carrier-added [18F]F-DOPA [59].In 2013, Martin et al. implemented the method of Wagner et al. to a GE TRACERlab MXFDG. In preliminary experiments, the automated synthesis of [18F]F-DOPA resulted in reproducible RCYs of 10–15% (n. d. c.), RCPs of >95%, and ee of >98% without giving other synthesis details such as reaction times and starting activities [61].


## 3.2. Nucleophilic Syntheses and Aspects of Automation

In nucleophilic substitution reactions on aromatic rings using [18F]fluoride, the standard leaving groups are mainly nitro- or trimethylammonium moieties (Figure 5) in combination with electron withdrawing groups such as –CO, –CN, and –NO2 to enable an efficient reaction. Further, halogen exchange reactions with substituted veratraldehyde (–Cl, –Br, and –F) were evaluated [62]. The first nucleophilic approaches for the synthesis of [18F]F-DOPA gave racemates ofd- andl-isomers of the tracer which were purified by chiral HPLC resulting in a significant loss of activity [63, 64].Figure 5
Most common precursors for no-carrier-added nucleophilic radiofluorination reactions producing [18F]F-DOPA.To overcome these problems, new radiosyntheses were developed based on enantiomerically pure chiral precursors or chiral auxiliaries [65–70]. The radiolabeling reactions using these precursors provide the product in moderate to good RCYs accompanied by a high enantiomeric excess of >96%. The most promising approach was published by Lemaire et al. giving [18F]F-DOPA in a RCY of 17–29% (d. c.) and a SA of >37 GBq/μmol [66]. In Table 2, selected syntheses using different enantiomerically pure chiral precursors or chiral auxiliaries are compared.Table 2
Selected synthesis parameters using chiral auxiliaries or precursors.
Precursor
Time [min]
RCY[%]  18F-label.
RCY[%]  overalla
SA [GBq/μmol]
ee [%]
Citation
16
100–110
51
12b
n. d.
n. d.
Ding et al. ’90 [63]
15 or 16
120
n. d.
5–10
n. d.
50 (rac.)
Lemaire et al. ’91 [65]
15
110
n. d.
5–10b
n. d.
83–96
Lemaire et al. ’93 [67]
15 or 16
120
20–35; ~50
3–5b
n. d.
>99
Reddy et al. ’93 [68]
15
90
45 ± 5
17–29
>37
>96
Lemaire et al. ’94 [66]
15 or 16
125
n. d.
4-5b
>74
98
Horti et al. ’95 [69]
15
85
~50
6–13b
>7.4
98
Najafi ’95 [70]
aUnless otherwise stated, RCYs are given decay corrected (d. c.) and bnondecay corrected (n. d. c.).In addition, asymmetric synthesis routes were developed for the radiosynthesis of [18F]F-DOPA with higher enantiomeric selectivity and higher RCYs comprising approaches with the precursors depicted in Figure 5 and enantioselective reactions utilizing different chiral phase-transfer catalysts (cPTC). The results from these asymmetric approaches are shown in Table 3.Table 3
Selected synthesis parameters utilizing chiral phase-transfer catalysts (cPTC) or asymmetric synthesis routes.
Precursor
Method
Time [min]
RCY[%] 18F-label.
RCY[%] overalla
SA[GBq/μmol]
ee[%]
Citation
15
Enzymatic
150
27
2
>200
>99
Kaneko et al. ’99 [77]
17
cPTC18c
110
n. d.
10–15b
74–185
95
Guillouet et al. ’01 [73]
17
cPTC18
80–85
10–40
7–15
n. d.
90
Zhang et al. ’02 [74]
16
Catalyst25d
120
53
16 ± 5
n. d.
96
Krasikova et al. ’04 [80]
17
cPTC18
100
40–50
25–30
n. d.
96
Lemaire et al. ’04 [78]
15
cPTC18
120
71
20 ± 4
>50
≥95
Shen et al. ’09 [83]
17
cPTC31e
63
50
36 ± 3
>750
>97
Libert et al. ’13 [86]
aUnless otherwise stated, RCYs are given decay corrected (d. c.) and bnondecay corrected (n. d. c.); csee Figure 6; dsee Figure 8; esee Figure 10.A very promising approach for the nucleophilic synthesis of [18F]F-DOPA yielding the product in high enantiomeric purities was the utilization of the chiral phase-transfer catalystO-ally-N-9-anthracenylmethyl-cinchonidinium bromide (18, Figure 6) described by Corey et al. in 1997 [71]. Based on the preliminary results of Lemaire et al. in 1999 [72] and Guillouet et al. in 2001 [73], Zhang et al. adopted the method in 2002 [74] and presented a promising synthesis route utilizing this cPTC18 for the enantioselective radiosynthesis of [18F]F-DOPA in RCYs of 7–15%, radiochemical purities of >99%, and an ee of 90% within 80–85 min synthesis time. However, special care has to be taken concerning the trimethylammonium veratraldehyde precursor17 which exhibits a limited stability upon storage of the precursor for more than six months at 0–4°C resulting in a decreasing RCY for the radiofluorination of17 from 40% to <10% [75].Figure 6
Chiral phase-transfer catalystO-ally-N-9-anthracenylmethyl-cinchonidinium bromide18.A limitation for this synthesis route is the achievable enantiomeric purities as, according to the European Pharmacopoeia monograph, the limit of the D-enantiomer in the final solution is 2% (ee 96%) [76]. Thus, the synthesis had to be further improved to comply with this limit. A promising approach was presented by Kaneko et al. in 1999 (Figure 7) [77]. The enzymatic reaction step was evaluated carefully and provided a conversion rate of 58% from [18F]fluorocatechol ([18F]21) to [18F]F-DOPA ([18F]7) under optimized conditions. Despite the efficient enzymatic conversion of [18F]F-catechol to the product, the overall RCY of [18F]F-DOPA that could be obtained was only 2.0% but resulted in the formation of the product in high SAs of >200 GBq/μmol within 150 min synthesis time. The enantiomeric excess was assumed to be 100% due to the enzymatic character of the reaction although being not confirmed.Figure 7
Synthesis pathway for the enzymatic preparation of [18F]F-DOPA according to Kaneko et al. [77].The automation of radiotracer syntheses is mandatory for their wide clinical distribution as an automated process gives the product in reproducible quality and limits the radiation exposure to the operating personnel, enabling high starting activities and thus the possibility to synthesize several patient doses in one radiosynthesis.Therefore, Lemaire et al. optimized the enantioselective reaction using the chiral phase-transfer catalysts18 and were able to obtain enantiomeric excesses of about 96% when performing the reaction in toluene at 0°C [78]. However, this reaction setup is difficult to realize in automated processes, due to cooling and heating steps in the same synthesis process. Thus, an optimized synthesis route was developed, preventing the use of diiodosilane. Aldehyde [18F]19 and its precursor17 (Figure 5) were trapped on a C18 cartridge, the precursor17 was removed with water from the solid support, and [18F]19 was reduced by aqueous NaBH4 and subsequently halogenated by HBr or HI on solid support, resulting in a synthesis setup that could be transferred to an automated synthesis module. Recently, this reaction setup was applied for the radiosynthesis and online conversion from aldehyde [18F]19 to different benzyl halides [79].Another very promising approach was presented in 2004 by Krasikova et al. [80]. An automated enantioselective radiosynthesis utilizing a novel substrate/catalyst pair, namely, NiPBPGly25 and (S)-NOBIN26 (Figure 8), was developed. In the key alkylation step, the electrophilic bromide [18F]2 reacts with the nickel complex25 in the presence of (S)-NOBIN to form the (S)-complex [18F]27. This enantioselective reaction step was accomplished at room temperature, which is favorable in terms of automation. Subsequently, the alkylation was quenched by HI or acetic acid before the solvent was removed in order to prevent racemization of the (S)-complex. Different purification steps were optimized to remove any potentially toxic substances present during the synthesis (Ni, Br, P, or B) which was confirmed by ICP-MS analysis of the final product. Using this method, [18F]F-DOPA was synthesized in an ee of 96% and RCYs of 16±5% [80] in a total synthesis time of 110–120 min. Although this approach seems to be promising, it has not found a widespread application so far which may be due to the laborious synthesis of the catalyst pair [81, 82] and the challenging purification procedures required for the synthesis which include self-made columns/cartridges in order to remove intermediate reagents and side products.Figure 8
Schematic depiction of the synthesis pathway utilizing NiPBPGly25 and (S)-NOBIN26 as a novel substrate/catalyst pair for the enantioselective radiosynthesis of [18F]F-DOPA by Krasikova et al. [80].The optimization efforts towards an automation for the routine production of [18F]F-DOPA finally resulted in promising synthesis approaches recently. In 2009, Shen et al. presented a method for the fully automated synthesis for [18F]F-DOPA [83] utilizing the cPTC18 which can be performed at ambient temperature (Figure 9), combining the methods described by Zhang et al. [74] and Lemaire et al. [78]. By optimization of the amounts of reagents during the alkylation process, they were able to obtain [18F]F-DOPA in RCYs of 20±4%, SAs of ~50 GBq/μmol, and ee of ≥95% within 120 min synthesis time. In order to obtain higher RCYs, it is important to radiolabel the nitro precursor15 in DMF instead of DMSO due to oxidation processes of the aldehyde15 occurring in DMSO [84, 85]. Furthermore, the utilization of HBr in combination with KI in the deprotection step resulted in higher RCYs compared to HI alone. However, as noncharacterized substances precipitate during the synthesis, a limitation of this method is the cumbersome maintenance of the synthesis module after each synthesis. To overcome this obstacle, the use of a cassette module would be favorable as this approach would not require the elaborate purification of the module after each use.Figure 9
Automated radiosynthesis procedure for [18F]F-DOPA using the chiral phase transfer catalyst18 [83].Libert and coworkers investigated different cPTC regarding their potential to produce [18F]F-DOPA in the highest enantiomeric excesses and high enantiomeric purities of >97% could be obtained under mild reaction conditions within short reaction times [86]. Together with the use of a structurally optimized chiral phase-transfer catalyst (31) [71, 87] (Figure 10), a much simplified synthesis setup for automation was enabled. With this optimization, the group of Libert and Lemaire was able to establish a fast automated synthesis and reported product amounts of >45 GBq obtained in RCYs of 24% (n. d. c.) and specific activities of >750 GBq/μmol [86] within 63 minutes (Figure 10). Furthermore, utilizing cPTC31 as the catalyst, an ee of >97% could be achieved.Figure 10
Schematic depiction of the automated synthesis pathway using the chiral phase-transfer catalyst31 [86].


## 3.3. Miscellaneous

In this chapter, some unconventional approaches for the production of [18F]F-DOPA are described.In 2008, Forsback et al. presented an electrophilic labeling approach for the production of [18F]F-DOPA in RCYs of 6.4±1.7% (d. c.) and SAs of 3.7±0.9 GBq/μmol [88]. The key step was the synthesis of [18F]F2 in an electrical discharge chamber by a 18F/19F-exchange reaction. The 18F-source was [18F]fluoromethane, which was mixed with a low amount (1 μmol) of carrier fluorine in neon (Ne/0.5% F2) inside the discharge chamber. [18F]Fluoromethane was produced from methyliodide by a nucleophilic substitution reaction with K[18F]F/K222 in acetonitrile. Deuterated solvents for the synthesis of [18F]F-DOPA like CDCl3, CD2Cl2, and C3D6O were also investigated providing significantly higher yields than Freon-11 [89].In 2012, Lee et al. presented a very fast oxidative fluorination approach for18F-aryl compounds utilizing a nickel-complex32 and [18F]fluoride (Figure 11). Nickel complex32 (1 mg), a hypervalent iodine oxidant33 (1 eq.), an aqueous solution of [18F]fluoride (2−5 μL, 3.7−18.5 MBq), and K222 (2.0 mg) in acetonitrile (200−500 μL) at 23°C yielded a Boc-protected [18F]F-DOPA-analogue [18F]34 in RCYs of 15±7% (n. d. c.) in less than 1 minute [90]. This might be also a useful approach for a very fast synthesis of [18F]F-DOPA.Figure 11
Schematic depiction of an oxidative fluorination approach using the nickel complex32 and a hypervalent iodine oxidant33 giving the Boc-protected [18F]F-DOPA-analogue[18F]34 [90].In 2013, Stenhagen et al. presented an Ag-mediated electrophilic [18F]fluorination of an enantiomerically pure precursor. The protected arylboronic ester was transformed to a 6-Ag-DOPA derivative with silver triflate. Next, [18F]selectfluor bis(triflate) in acetone-d6 was added. [18F]F-DOPA was obtained after 20 min reaction at ambient temperature and 5 min deprotection in RCYs of 19±12% and SAs of 2.6±0.3 GBq/μmol [91]. These results are comparable with the best known electrophilic approaches and could also serve for an automated synthesis.In summary, radiosynthesis procedures for [18F]F-DOPA were developed which can give the radiotracer in high RCYs, SAs, and enantiomeric excesses in short reaction times. Future efforts to even further improve these results could include the utilization of nonoxidizing solvents and microwave conditions in order to achieve even higher [18F]fluoride incorporation rates. Up to now, automated systems based on the radiochemistry described by, for example, Wagner et al. [59], Martin et al. [61], and Libert et al. [86] are commercially available.


## 4. Conclusion

In over 30 years, the radiosynthesis of [18F]F-DOPA was performed via electrophilic and isotopic exchange routes, when the tracer was mainly applied for thein vivo PET imaging of central motor disorders and metabolism imaging purposes. However, the main production route with [18F]F2 and commercially available stannyl precursors provides [18F]F-DOPA in relatively low RCYs and SAs, limiting the use of this promising radiotracer to the imaging of neuronal function and brain malignancies, which is still its main application.With the discovery of the potential of [18F]F-DOPA as radiotracer for the imaging of peripheral malignancies such as neuroendocrine tumors, new radiosynthesis approaches based on nucleophilic substitution reactions were developed, yielding [18F]F-DOPA in higher RCYs and SAs as well as shorter synthesis times. Here, two main approaches were followed: one comprises the introduction of nucleophilic [18F]fluoride into complex chiral precursors, followed by deprotection and purification, and the other approach starts with introduction of [18F]fluoride into simple precursors followed by the utilization of chiral phase-transfer catalysts for an enantioselective synthesis of the product. These processes can also be transferred to automated synthesis modules allowing for a broader dissemination of this favorable radiotracer extending the palette of radiotracers towards a patient-individualized precision medicine.



---

*Source: 674063-2014-05-28.xml*