# Synthesis of 1,2,3-Triazole Derivatives and Its Evaluation as Corrosion Inhibitors for Carbon Steel

Authors: Gabriel O. Resende; Sara F. Teixeira; Igor F. Figueiredo; Alexandre A. Godoy; Dafne Júlia F. Lougon; Bruno A. Cotrim; Flávia C. de Souza
Journal: International Journal of Electrochemistry
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

Heterocyclic compounds containing the 1,2,3-triazole moiety can be synthesized through click-chemistry, which is rapid reactions with good yields allowing the synthesis of great derivatives diversity by making minor changes in the reagents. The products were obtained with good yields through a synthetic route which uses ready available nonexpensive commercial reagents and without any further purification of any product or intermediate. The carbon steel anticorrosive activity was tested through weight loss and electrochemical assays in acid media. It was observed relevant inhibition efficiency (> 90%) for inhibitors1 and2. From Langmuir isotherm, it was hypothesized the adsorption of inhibitors on the carbon steel surface might occur by physical and chemical interaction; however, the activation energy raised suggests a physisorption process for the interaction of the inhibitor on the carbon steel surface.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Heterocyclic compounds have a great diversity of physical, chemistry, and biological properties which provide them a wide range of practical uses. This chemistry class is largely used in the pharmaceutical industry both in commercial products and in research and development and more recently they are gaining attention in researches for the development of new anticorrosive compounds [1, 2].Compounds containing 1,2,4-triazole moiety are widely studied as anticorrosive for copper [3–5] and mild steel in hydrochloric acid [6–8], phosphoric acid [9], and nitric acid [9]. Although not widely studied, the use of 1,2,3-triazole derivatives as an anticorrosive for steel [10, 11] can be found in the literature.Compounds containing the 1,2,3-triazole moiety can be synthesized through click-chemistry, which is rapid reactions with good yields allowing the synthesis of a great derivatives diversity by making minor changes in the reagents. The copper-catalyzed 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction between an azide and an alkyne is widely used for the synthesis of compounds with the 1,2,3-triazole ring with substituents in position 4 [12]. Other methodology for the synthesis of this class of compounds is the reaction of an azide with methylenic activated compounds, using different catalysts generating a triazol with substituents in positions 4 and 5 [13].The objective of the present work is the synthesis of 1,2,3-triazole derivatives (Figure1) and evaluation of their activity as corrosion inhibitor for carbon steel in corrosive environments.Figure 1
1,2,3-Triazole derivatives structures.


## 2. Experimental

Reactions progress was monitored by TLC on aluminum sheets precoated with silica gel 60 (HF-254, Merck), film thickness of 0.25 mm. Nuclear magnetic resonance (1H and 13C NMR) spectra were recorded using a Varian 500 MHz instrument. For the 1H NMR spectra, chemical shifts (δ) are referenced from tetramethylsilane (TMS; 0.00 ppm) and the coupling constants (J) are reported in Hz. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of triazole derivatives were obtained at 25°C in a Bruker Alpha spectrophotometer using the attenuated total reflectance (ATR) module.All reagents and solvents used were commercially available and were employed without further purification unless specifically indicated.


### 2.1. Inhibitor Synthesis

Synthesis of 1-azido-4-nitrobenzene (  5). In a flask previously containing HCl 6N (30 mL),p-nitroaniline (3 g, 21.74 mmol) was added with magnetic stirring at room temperature. Afterwards, a solution of NaNO2 (1.5 g, 21.74 mmol) in 20 mL of water was added dropwise controlling the temperature at 5-10°C. The reaction was stirred for 1 h at room temperature and a solution of NaN3 (1.41 g, 21.74 mmol) in 20 mL of water was added, slowly, under vigorous stirring. The reaction was followed by thin layer chromatography (TLC) and product was filtered, washed with water, and dried. The product was obtained as a yellowish solid yield: 90% (3.2 g).FT ATR IR 3069 (C-H ar st), 2120 (N3 st), 1590 (ar C=C st), 1512 (C-NO2 ass st), 1287 (C-NO2 sym st).Synthesis of (1-(4-nitrophenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methanol (  7). To a suspension of (5) (1.2 g, 7.32 mmol) interc-butanol (5 mL) was added a mixture of ascorbic acid (281 mg, 1.6 mmol), CuSO4.5H2O (145 mg, 0.58 mmol), and NaHCO3 (135 mg, 1.6 mmol) in 5.5 mL of water. Afterwards, propargylic alcohol (0.52 mL, 9 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred for 24-48 h at room temperature. The reaction was followed by TLC and the product was obtained by filtration, washed with water, and dried. The product was obtained as a brownish solid and was used without further purification in next step, yield 78% (1.25 g).FT-IR (ATR) 3436 (O-H st), 1598 (ar C=C st), 1510 (C-NO2 ass st), 1287 (C-NO2 sym st).Synthesis of (1-(4-aminophenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methanol (  1). To a suspension of (7) (1.54 g, 7.0 mmol) in water (40 mL), NH4Cl (750 mg, 14 mmol) and zinc powder (3.325 g, 50.8 mmol) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred and heated to 80°C during 3 hours. The resulting mixture was filtered and washed with dichloromethane. The aqueous phase was extracted with dichloromethane five times. The organic phase was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated to obtain the product as a pinkish solid, yield of 68% (0.90 g).FT-IR (ATR) 3462 (O-H st), 3362 (N-H st), 1631 (ar C=C st), 860 (ar C-Hδ).1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.28 (s, 1H), 7.45-7.43 (d,J=9.0 Hz, 2H), 6.71-6.69 (d,J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 5.32 (s, 2H), 5.05 (s, 1H), 4.58 (s, 2H).13C NMR (22.5 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 149.22, 148.48, 126.26, 121.54, 120.62, 113.93, 55.06.Synthesis of ethyl 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-methyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxylate (  6). To a round bottom flask of 50 mL were added 276 mg (2 mmol) of compound5 and 1 mL of DMF and the solid was solubilized with magnetic stirrer at room temperature. Afterwards, 0.6 mL of trimethylamine and 0.55 mL of ethyl acetoacetate were added to the flask. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 hours. The reaction was followed by thin layer chromatography. The work up of the product was made through filtration. The reaction had a yield of 94% (436 mg), brownish solid.FT ATR IR 3080 (C-H ar st), 2976 (C-H aliph st), 1711 (C=O st), 1530 (C-NO2 assym st), 1343 (C-NO2 sym st), 852 (ar C-H δ).Synthesis of ethyl 1-(4-aminophenyl)-5-methyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxylate (  3). In a round bottom flask of 100 mL were added 332 mg (1,3 mmol) of compound6, 50 mg of palladium 10% supported on active charcoal 10%, 375 mg of ammonium formate, and 2 mL of methanol. The reaction was maintained under nitrogen atmosphere with magnetic stirring and room temperature for 24 hours. The reaction was followed by thin layer chromatography. The reaction mixture was filtered through Celite and the Celite was washed with 10 mL of dichloromethane. The filtrate was extracted with brine; the organic phase was dried with Na2SO4 anhydrous and then distilled under reduced pressure. The product was obtained as a white solid with a yield of 83.2% (244 mg).FT-IR (ATR) 3345 (N-H st), 2978 (C-H st), 1702 (C=O st), 1516 (ar C=C st)), 840 (ar C-Hδ).1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.17-7.16 (d,J=9.0 Hz, 2H), 6.73-7.72 (d,J=9.0 Hz, 2H), 5.50 (S, 1H), 4.37-4.32 (q,J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.43 (s, 3H), 1.35-1.32 (t,J=7.5, 3H).13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 161.70, 150.71, 139.36, 135.93, 126.75, 123.90, 114.23, 60.67, 14.60, 10.04.Synthesis of 1-(5-methyl-1-(4-nitrophenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)ethanone (  8). To a round bottom flask of 10 mL were added 693 mg (3.2 mmol) of compound5 and 1.7 mL of DMF and the solid was solubilized with magnetic stirrer at room temperature. Afterwards, 1.2 mL of trimethylamine and 0.9 mL of ethyl acetylacetone were added to the flask. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 hours. The reaction was followed by thin layer chromatography. The work up of the product was made through filtration. The product was obtained as a solid powder with a 75.5% yield (740 mg).FT ATR IR 3076 (C-H ar st), 1677 (C=O st), 1518 (C-NO2 assym st), 1341(C-NO2 sym st), 853 (ar C-H δ)Synthesis of 1-(1-(4-aminophenyl)-5-methyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)ethanol (  2). In a 10 mL round bottom flask was added compound 208 mg of compound8, 5 mL of methanol, and 0.8 mL of an aqueous saturated solution of CuSO4. In a second flask it was prepared a solution of 190 mg of NaBH4 in 6 mL of a mixture of water/methanol 1:1. Under ice bath (5-10°C) the content of the second flask was added dropwise to the first flask and it was observed the formation of a CuS black precipitate. The reaction was followed by thin layer chromatography. The CuS precipitated was filtered and methanol was distilled under reduced pressure. The concentrate was solubilized in ethyl acetate and extracted with water. The organic phase was dried with anhydrous Na2SO4 and the solvent was distilled under reduced pressure. The product was obtained as a purplish solid with 79% yield (144 mg)FT-IR (ATR) 3466 (O-H st), 3326 (N-H st), 2972 (C-H st), 1517 (ar C=C st), 837 (ar C-Hδ).1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.10-7.09 (d,J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.71-6.70 (d,J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 5.38 (s, 2H), 4.92-4.88 (m, 2H), 2.23 (s, 3H), 1.50-1.49 (d,J=6.5, 3H).13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 150.09, 147.89, 130.49, 126.40, 114.25, 62.12, 23.52, 9.02.


### 2.2. Gravimetric Weight Loss

Carbon steel used as specimens was cut into 3.0 cm × 1.0 cm × 1.0 cm sections and abraded with emery paper of different granulometry (320, 600, and 1000). The chemical composition ASTM 1020 carbon steel is (wt%): C (0.18%), Mn (0.30%), S (0.05%), and Fe (balance). These pieces were washed with double distilled water, degreased with acetone, and dried in air.Triplicate specimens were immersed in a 1.0 mol L–1 HCl aqueous solution prepared from 37% HCl (purchased from Merck Co. Darmstadt, Germany) and double distilled water, in the absence and presence of corrosion inhibitors at 250 mg L–1, for a period of 24 h. After the specimens were removed, washed with water and acetone, and dried in warm air, the weight was obtained according to ASTM G31-72 [ASTM International G31-72: Standard practice for laboratory Immersion Corrosion Testing of Metals. West Conshohocken: ASTM International; 1999] (standard method) and determined using an analytical balance with a 0.1 mg precision. The efficiency of inhibition (E.I.%) was calculated using (1)E.I.%=W0-WW0×100where W0 and W are the weight loss (g cm–2 h–1) in the absence (blank) and presence of the corrosion inhibitor compound, respectively. The corrosion rate in millimeters penetration per year (mm/y) was obtained (2)W=KMAtρwhere K is a constant (8.76 × 104), M is the weight loss in grams, A is the specimen area in cm2, t is time in hour, and ρ is the specific mass of carbon steel (7.86 g cm–3).The gravimetric testing was also performed at different inhibitor concentrations (250–1250 mg L–1), different immersion times (4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h), and different temperatures (25, 35, 45, and 55°C).


### 2.3. Electrochemical Experiments

Electrochemical measurements were carried out in conventional three-electrode cell (100 mL) using a Microautolab III/FRA2 (Eco Chemie; Utrecht, the Netherlands) coupled to a personal computer and controlled with GPES 4.9 software (General Purpose Electrochemical System). In all cases, ASTM was used as standard method. The supporting electrolyte was the same used in loss weight and the measurements were carried out in 100 mL of nonstirred and naturally aerated electrolyte maintained at 25°C.Carbon steel specimens with same composition used in the gravimetric weight loss measurements were cut and employed as work electrode with exposed surface area of 0.78 cm2. These carbon steel electrodes also were abraded in politriz Aropol 2V (Arotec) with emery paper of different granulometry (320, 400, 600, and 1000), washed with double distilled water, degreased with acetone, and dried in air. Saturated calomel electrode (SCE) was used as the reference electrode, and a Pt wire with large superficial area was used as the auxiliary electrode.Work electrode in electrochemical measurements was kept in support electrolyte during 1 h to reach its stable open-circuit potential (OCP). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was performed using the aforementioned potentiostat over a frequency range of 100 kHz to 10 mHz at the stable open-circuit potential with an AC wave of 10 mV (rms). Potentiodynamic polarization curves were also obtained after 1 h in the open-circuit potential and performed using a scan rate equal to 1 mV s–1 from –300 mV up to +300 mV in relation to OCP.The synthetic inhibitors with the best inhibitory efficiency (I.E.%) by gravimetric weight loss were subjected to the electrochemical testing of OCP, EIS measurements, and polarization curves. The I.E.(%) value was also obtained from potentiodynamic polarization curves and EIS diagrams from (3)I.E.%=jcorr,0-jcorrjcorr,0×100where jcorr,0 and jcorr are the corrosion current density obtained from Tafel plots in the absence and presence of an inhibitor. The I.E.(%) value from EIS diagrams was calculated from (4)I.E.%=Rct-Rct,0Rct×100were Rct,0 and Rct are the charge transfer resistance in the presence and absence of the inhibitor, both obtained from the EIS diagrams by extrapolation of the semicircle.


## 2.1. Inhibitor Synthesis

Synthesis of 1-azido-4-nitrobenzene (  5). In a flask previously containing HCl 6N (30 mL),p-nitroaniline (3 g, 21.74 mmol) was added with magnetic stirring at room temperature. Afterwards, a solution of NaNO2 (1.5 g, 21.74 mmol) in 20 mL of water was added dropwise controlling the temperature at 5-10°C. The reaction was stirred for 1 h at room temperature and a solution of NaN3 (1.41 g, 21.74 mmol) in 20 mL of water was added, slowly, under vigorous stirring. The reaction was followed by thin layer chromatography (TLC) and product was filtered, washed with water, and dried. The product was obtained as a yellowish solid yield: 90% (3.2 g).FT ATR IR 3069 (C-H ar st), 2120 (N3 st), 1590 (ar C=C st), 1512 (C-NO2 ass st), 1287 (C-NO2 sym st).Synthesis of (1-(4-nitrophenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methanol (  7). To a suspension of (5) (1.2 g, 7.32 mmol) interc-butanol (5 mL) was added a mixture of ascorbic acid (281 mg, 1.6 mmol), CuSO4.5H2O (145 mg, 0.58 mmol), and NaHCO3 (135 mg, 1.6 mmol) in 5.5 mL of water. Afterwards, propargylic alcohol (0.52 mL, 9 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred for 24-48 h at room temperature. The reaction was followed by TLC and the product was obtained by filtration, washed with water, and dried. The product was obtained as a brownish solid and was used without further purification in next step, yield 78% (1.25 g).FT-IR (ATR) 3436 (O-H st), 1598 (ar C=C st), 1510 (C-NO2 ass st), 1287 (C-NO2 sym st).Synthesis of (1-(4-aminophenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methanol (  1). To a suspension of (7) (1.54 g, 7.0 mmol) in water (40 mL), NH4Cl (750 mg, 14 mmol) and zinc powder (3.325 g, 50.8 mmol) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred and heated to 80°C during 3 hours. The resulting mixture was filtered and washed with dichloromethane. The aqueous phase was extracted with dichloromethane five times. The organic phase was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated to obtain the product as a pinkish solid, yield of 68% (0.90 g).FT-IR (ATR) 3462 (O-H st), 3362 (N-H st), 1631 (ar C=C st), 860 (ar C-Hδ).1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.28 (s, 1H), 7.45-7.43 (d,J=9.0 Hz, 2H), 6.71-6.69 (d,J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 5.32 (s, 2H), 5.05 (s, 1H), 4.58 (s, 2H).13C NMR (22.5 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 149.22, 148.48, 126.26, 121.54, 120.62, 113.93, 55.06.Synthesis of ethyl 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-methyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxylate (  6). To a round bottom flask of 50 mL were added 276 mg (2 mmol) of compound5 and 1 mL of DMF and the solid was solubilized with magnetic stirrer at room temperature. Afterwards, 0.6 mL of trimethylamine and 0.55 mL of ethyl acetoacetate were added to the flask. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 hours. The reaction was followed by thin layer chromatography. The work up of the product was made through filtration. The reaction had a yield of 94% (436 mg), brownish solid.FT ATR IR 3080 (C-H ar st), 2976 (C-H aliph st), 1711 (C=O st), 1530 (C-NO2 assym st), 1343 (C-NO2 sym st), 852 (ar C-H δ).Synthesis of ethyl 1-(4-aminophenyl)-5-methyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxylate (  3). In a round bottom flask of 100 mL were added 332 mg (1,3 mmol) of compound6, 50 mg of palladium 10% supported on active charcoal 10%, 375 mg of ammonium formate, and 2 mL of methanol. The reaction was maintained under nitrogen atmosphere with magnetic stirring and room temperature for 24 hours. The reaction was followed by thin layer chromatography. The reaction mixture was filtered through Celite and the Celite was washed with 10 mL of dichloromethane. The filtrate was extracted with brine; the organic phase was dried with Na2SO4 anhydrous and then distilled under reduced pressure. The product was obtained as a white solid with a yield of 83.2% (244 mg).FT-IR (ATR) 3345 (N-H st), 2978 (C-H st), 1702 (C=O st), 1516 (ar C=C st)), 840 (ar C-Hδ).1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.17-7.16 (d,J=9.0 Hz, 2H), 6.73-7.72 (d,J=9.0 Hz, 2H), 5.50 (S, 1H), 4.37-4.32 (q,J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.43 (s, 3H), 1.35-1.32 (t,J=7.5, 3H).13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 161.70, 150.71, 139.36, 135.93, 126.75, 123.90, 114.23, 60.67, 14.60, 10.04.Synthesis of 1-(5-methyl-1-(4-nitrophenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)ethanone (  8). To a round bottom flask of 10 mL were added 693 mg (3.2 mmol) of compound5 and 1.7 mL of DMF and the solid was solubilized with magnetic stirrer at room temperature. Afterwards, 1.2 mL of trimethylamine and 0.9 mL of ethyl acetylacetone were added to the flask. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 hours. The reaction was followed by thin layer chromatography. The work up of the product was made through filtration. The product was obtained as a solid powder with a 75.5% yield (740 mg).FT ATR IR 3076 (C-H ar st), 1677 (C=O st), 1518 (C-NO2 assym st), 1341(C-NO2 sym st), 853 (ar C-H δ)Synthesis of 1-(1-(4-aminophenyl)-5-methyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)ethanol (  2). In a 10 mL round bottom flask was added compound 208 mg of compound8, 5 mL of methanol, and 0.8 mL of an aqueous saturated solution of CuSO4. In a second flask it was prepared a solution of 190 mg of NaBH4 in 6 mL of a mixture of water/methanol 1:1. Under ice bath (5-10°C) the content of the second flask was added dropwise to the first flask and it was observed the formation of a CuS black precipitate. The reaction was followed by thin layer chromatography. The CuS precipitated was filtered and methanol was distilled under reduced pressure. The concentrate was solubilized in ethyl acetate and extracted with water. The organic phase was dried with anhydrous Na2SO4 and the solvent was distilled under reduced pressure. The product was obtained as a purplish solid with 79% yield (144 mg)FT-IR (ATR) 3466 (O-H st), 3326 (N-H st), 2972 (C-H st), 1517 (ar C=C st), 837 (ar C-Hδ).1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.10-7.09 (d,J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.71-6.70 (d,J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 5.38 (s, 2H), 4.92-4.88 (m, 2H), 2.23 (s, 3H), 1.50-1.49 (d,J=6.5, 3H).13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 150.09, 147.89, 130.49, 126.40, 114.25, 62.12, 23.52, 9.02.


## 2.2. Gravimetric Weight Loss

Carbon steel used as specimens was cut into 3.0 cm × 1.0 cm × 1.0 cm sections and abraded with emery paper of different granulometry (320, 600, and 1000). The chemical composition ASTM 1020 carbon steel is (wt%): C (0.18%), Mn (0.30%), S (0.05%), and Fe (balance). These pieces were washed with double distilled water, degreased with acetone, and dried in air.Triplicate specimens were immersed in a 1.0 mol L–1 HCl aqueous solution prepared from 37% HCl (purchased from Merck Co. Darmstadt, Germany) and double distilled water, in the absence and presence of corrosion inhibitors at 250 mg L–1, for a period of 24 h. After the specimens were removed, washed with water and acetone, and dried in warm air, the weight was obtained according to ASTM G31-72 [ASTM International G31-72: Standard practice for laboratory Immersion Corrosion Testing of Metals. West Conshohocken: ASTM International; 1999] (standard method) and determined using an analytical balance with a 0.1 mg precision. The efficiency of inhibition (E.I.%) was calculated using (1)E.I.%=W0-WW0×100where W0 and W are the weight loss (g cm–2 h–1) in the absence (blank) and presence of the corrosion inhibitor compound, respectively. The corrosion rate in millimeters penetration per year (mm/y) was obtained (2)W=KMAtρwhere K is a constant (8.76 × 104), M is the weight loss in grams, A is the specimen area in cm2, t is time in hour, and ρ is the specific mass of carbon steel (7.86 g cm–3).The gravimetric testing was also performed at different inhibitor concentrations (250–1250 mg L–1), different immersion times (4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h), and different temperatures (25, 35, 45, and 55°C).


## 2.3. Electrochemical Experiments

Electrochemical measurements were carried out in conventional three-electrode cell (100 mL) using a Microautolab III/FRA2 (Eco Chemie; Utrecht, the Netherlands) coupled to a personal computer and controlled with GPES 4.9 software (General Purpose Electrochemical System). In all cases, ASTM was used as standard method. The supporting electrolyte was the same used in loss weight and the measurements were carried out in 100 mL of nonstirred and naturally aerated electrolyte maintained at 25°C.Carbon steel specimens with same composition used in the gravimetric weight loss measurements were cut and employed as work electrode with exposed surface area of 0.78 cm2. These carbon steel electrodes also were abraded in politriz Aropol 2V (Arotec) with emery paper of different granulometry (320, 400, 600, and 1000), washed with double distilled water, degreased with acetone, and dried in air. Saturated calomel electrode (SCE) was used as the reference electrode, and a Pt wire with large superficial area was used as the auxiliary electrode.Work electrode in electrochemical measurements was kept in support electrolyte during 1 h to reach its stable open-circuit potential (OCP). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was performed using the aforementioned potentiostat over a frequency range of 100 kHz to 10 mHz at the stable open-circuit potential with an AC wave of 10 mV (rms). Potentiodynamic polarization curves were also obtained after 1 h in the open-circuit potential and performed using a scan rate equal to 1 mV s–1 from –300 mV up to +300 mV in relation to OCP.The synthetic inhibitors with the best inhibitory efficiency (I.E.%) by gravimetric weight loss were subjected to the electrochemical testing of OCP, EIS measurements, and polarization curves. The I.E.(%) value was also obtained from potentiodynamic polarization curves and EIS diagrams from (3)I.E.%=jcorr,0-jcorrjcorr,0×100where jcorr,0 and jcorr are the corrosion current density obtained from Tafel plots in the absence and presence of an inhibitor. The I.E.(%) value from EIS diagrams was calculated from (4)I.E.%=Rct-Rct,0Rct×100were Rct,0 and Rct are the charge transfer resistance in the presence and absence of the inhibitor, both obtained from the EIS diagrams by extrapolation of the semicircle.


## 3. Results and Discussions

### 3.1. Inhibitor Synthesis and Characterization

Synthetic route proposed to obtain triazoles compounds was presented in Scheme1. Briefly, the reaction ofp-nitroaniline (4) with sodium nitrite in acidic medium and addition of sodium azide was used to obtain compound5 [12]. The intermediate5 was reacted with ethyl acetoacetate in the presence of triethylamine to obtain compound7 [13]. Compound8was obtained from reaction of intermediate6 with propargyl alcohol catalyzed by Cu+ [12] and compound9from reaction of intermediate6 with acetoacetone in the presence of triethylamine [13]. Compounds3 and1 were obtained from respective reaction of6,7, and8 with zinc in presence of ammonium chloride and water or Pd/C with ammonium formate [14]. Compound2 was obtained from reaction of compound8with sodium borohydride in the presence of copper sulphate [15].Scheme 1
Synthetic route to triazole derivatives compounds3–8: (a) (1) HCl/NaNO3  (2) NaN3; (b) Ethyl Acetoacetate, Et3N, DMF; (c) Pd/C, ammonium formate; (d) (1) Ascorbic Acid, CuSO4.5H2O, NaHCO3 (2) Propargylic Alcohol; (e) Zn, NH4Cl/H2O; (f) Et3N, Acetylacetone; (g) NaBH4/MeOH, Cu2SO4.5H2O.The products were obtained using synthetic route using ready available nonexpensive commercial reagents and without any further purification of any product or intermediate. Products were obtained in good purity as observed in infrared and RMN analysis and yields of all synthetic steps were good varying between 60 and 94%.


### 3.2. Gravimetric Weight Loss Measurements

In an electrochemical spontaneous corrosion process, when the metal interacts with electrolyte solution, both anodic and cathodic reactions occur. Corrosion mechanism of carbon steel in acid solution can happen by reaction between metallic iron and H+ producing ferrous ion (Fe2+) and hydrogen gas, shown as follows [16]:Fe + H→ [FeHads]+[FeHads]+ + e-→ [FeHads][FeHads] + H+ + e-→ Fe + H2Fe→ Fe2+ + 2e-The inhibition efficiency obtained from weight loss experiments with carbon steel in acid medium is presented in Table1. An imidazoline based commercial corrosion inhibitor was used in same concentration to compare the inhibition efficiency of proposed inhibitors.Table 1
Inhibitor efficiencies to carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl solution containing 250 mg L–1 of commercial and proposed inhibitors after immersion for 24 h at 25°C.
Inhibitor I . E .  (%) Error (%) 1 91.9 1.3 2 95.8 0.7 3 70.2 1.3 Commercial 72.2 1.9The data from Table1 suggest that the triazole compounds behave as corrosion inhibitors and that their inhibition efficiency remains high through long periods of immersion (24 h) for low inhibitor concentration. Inhibitors1 and2 showed the best inhibitions efficiencies (greater than 90%) with a relative standard deviation lower than 2%. Analyzing this result, we can hypothesize that the hydroxyl group present in both compounds1 and2 and absent in compound3 could be an important group with anticorrosive activity. Additional studies, as molecular docking between the synthesized inhibitors and the metal alloy, should be done in order to understand the structure–activity relationships for the synthesized triazole corrosion inhibitors. Therefore, we chose inhibitors1 and2 to carry out further corrosion assays and try to explain the corrosion inhibition mechanism.The rates of carbon steel corrosion in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl aqueous solution, in the presence and absence of the best inhibitors, in concentration range of 250–1250 mg L–1 for 24 h immersion at 25°C, as well as the efficiency results, are shown in Table 2.Table 2
Inhibitor efficiencies and corrosion rates to carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl solution with different concentrations of inhibitors, after immersion for 24 h at 25°C.
Inhibitor Concentration (mg L –1 ) Inhibitor 1 Inhibitor 2 Commercial Inhibitor W I . E . Error W I . E . Error W I . E . Error (mm/y) (%) (%) (mm/y) (%) (%) (mm/y) (%) (%) Blank 12.8 – – 12.8 – – 12.8 – – 250 1.0 91.9 1.3 0.5 95.8 0.7 2.2 72.2 1.9 500 0.9 93.4 0.3 0.4 96.7 0.3 1.3 82.9 1.2 750 0.7 94.3 0.8 0.6 95.5 5.5 1.3 83.1 0.9 1000 0.6 95.0 0.5 0.2 98.2 0.3 1.3 83.9 0.7 1250 0.5 96.2 0.2 0.1 99.2 0.2 0.8 84.1 0.5The carbon steel corrosion rate (W) shown in Table 2 was significantly reduced with addition of the inhibitors. Those results show the inhibitory effect of the triazole compounds against carbon steel corrosion in low pH solutions. Furthermore, the inhibition efficiency grew when the concentration of triazole compounds in this medium increased. It has also been observed that the inhibition efficiencies of compound2 are higher when compared to those of compound1.The corrosion process was also investigated in different immersion time of carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl aqueous solution in presence and absence of 500 mg L–1 of inhibitors (4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h) at room temperature and the results of the weight loss measurements are shown in Table 3.Table 3
Inhibitor efficiencies and corrosion rates to carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl aqueous solution in presence and absence of the inhibitor (500 mg L−1) with different immersion times, at 25°C.
Immersion Time (h) Blank Inhibitor 1 Inhibitor 2 W W I . E. Error W I . E . Error (mm/y) (mm/y) ( % ) ( % ) (mm/y) ( % ) ( % ) 4 16.0 1.7 89.2 1.5 0.3 97.9 0.6 8 14.7 1.8 87.5 1.9 0.3 97.9 0.2 12 14.7 1.6 88.8 0.7 0.2 98.7 0.5 24 12.8 0.9 93.4 0.3 0.4 96.7 0.3 48 14.2 1.6 88.6 1.2 0.3 97.9 0.2It can be observed in Table3 that in solutions without inhibitor the uniform corrosion rate is very severe for all immersion times (varying of 16.0 mm/y to 12.8 mm/y) and the rate was greatly reduced with the addition of the inhibitors for all immersion times, reaching 0.9 mm/y and 0.4 mm/y in the presence of the inhibitors with 24 h of immersion. These corrosion rates are considered low, according to Gentil (for cheap materials, like carbon steel, the corrosion rate could be acceptable in the range of 0.225 to 1.5 mm/y) [17].Corrosion rate reduction in presence of inhibitors occurs due to the formation of protective layer by inhibitor adsorption on the metallic surface. To investigate the adsorption behavior of triazole compounds, various isotherms were used and Langmuir isotherm was the best fit with the experimental data from Table2. Langmuir isotherm was obtained from linear correlation between the level of surface coating (θ) and inhibitor concentration (C). The adsorption isotherm used is plotted assuming that all adsorption sites are equivalent and that binding of particles is unaffected by any nearby occupied or unoccupied locations. In accordance with this isotherm, θ/C is related to C by (5)Cθ=C+1Kwhere K is the adsorption equilibrium constant. Figure 2 shows the relationship between C/θ and the concentration of inhibitors.Figure 2
Langmuir adsorption isotherms of triazole compounds on the carbon steel surface in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl aqueous solution.A linear correlation can be observed in Figure2 with significant correlation coefficients (r), showing the validity of the isotherm (Table 4). The curve slope is near the unity, which can suggest that the inhibitor adsorbed molecules form a monolayer on carbon steel surface. The adsorption constant (K) was calculated from the Langmuir intercept and related to the standard Gibbs free energy (∆Gads0) according to (6)K=155.55exp⁡-∆Gads0RTwhere R is the universal gas constant, T is the absolute temperature, and 55.55 mol L–1 is the water molar concentration in solution. Table 4 shows the values of the slope (α), the correlation coefficient (r) of the Langmuir isotherm, the adsorption constant (K), and the standard Gibbs free energy (∆Gads0).Table 4
Values of theα and r of the Langmuir isotherm, K, and ∆Gads0 obtained for the corrosion inhibitors.
Inhibitor Parameters of Langmuir isotherm α r K (L mmol –1 ) Δ G a d s 0 (KJ mol –1 ) 1 1.027 0.9999 9.25 –33.6 2 0.998 0.9991 11.36 –33.1The∆Gads0 values obtained from (6) were −33.6 and 33.1 kJ mol−1 to compounds1 and2, respectively. Generally, values of ∆Gads0 greater than −20 kJ mol−1 indicate electrostatic interactions attributed to inhibition interaction between the charged compounds and the charged metal surface (physisorption) and values equal or smaller than −40 kJ mol−1 are related to electrons share or electrons transfer from organic molecules of the inhibitor to the metal surface, forming a coordinate bond (chemisorption). In accordance with the ∆Gads0 values obtained, it can be hypothesized that the adsorption of both compounds is not only by physisorption or chemisorption but by obeying a comprehensive adsorption (chemisorption and physisorption). It is difficult to differentiate between chemisorption and physisorption based only on these criteria, particularly when charged species are adsorbed.The effects of temperature on the corrosion of carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl solution in absence and presence of 250 mg L–1 of inhibitors were studied during 4 h, varying temperatures (25, 35, 45, and 55°C). The corrosion rates and inhibitor efficiencies obtained in this study were presented in Table 5.Table 5
Inhibitor efficiencies and corrosion rates to carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl aqueous solution in absence and presence of 250 mg L–1 of inhibitors during 4 h, varying temperatures.
Temperature Inhibitor W I . E . Error ( C   ∘ ) (mm/y) ( % ) ( % ) 25 Blank 16.0 − − 1 1.7 89.2 1.5 2 0.3 97.9 0.6  35 Blank 33.6 − − 1 3.6 89.4 0.6 2 0.8 97.6 1.6  45 Blank 66.1 − − 1 5.9 91.1 0.4 2 2.3 96.5 0.2  55 Blank 99.8 − − 1 13.0 87.0 0.3 2 5.4 94.6 0.3Table5 shows that in solutions without inhibitor the corrosion process is accentuated and increased with the temperature (varying of 16.0 mm/y to 99.8 mm/y). It can be observed that corrosion rate reduces with the addition of the inhibitors for all temperatures, in the presence of the inhibitors, and inhibition efficiencies increase. These inhibition efficiencies stay high even at high temperatures (87.0% ±0.3% and 94.6% ±0.3% at 55°C).The apparent activation energy for carbon steel corrosion in absence and presence of 250 mg L–1 of inhibitors was determined from an Arrhenius-type plot according to (7)ln⁡Wcorr=-EaRT+ln⁡Awhere Wcorr is corrosion rate, Ea is activation energy, A is the frequency factor, T is the absolute temperature, and R is the molar gas constant. Arrhenius plots of ln⁡Wcorr versus 1/T in the absence and presence of 250 mg L–1 of inhibitors are shown in Figure 3.Figure 3
Arrhenius plots ofln⁡Wcorr versus 1/T in the absence and presence of 250 mg L–1 of inhibitors compounds.The apparent activation energy obtained for the corrosion process in the acid solution was 49.7 kJ mol–1 and in the acid solution in presence of1 and2 inhibitors were 55.2 and 78.8 kJ mol–1, respectively (Table 6). It was clear that apparent activation energy increase with the presence of inhibitors compounds indicates the physical adsorption mechanism [18].Table 6
Thermodynamic parameters of corrosion inhibition process of carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl solution in absence and presence of inhibitors.
Inhibitor E a r 2 Δ H Δ S r 2 E a - Δ H (kJ mol –1 ) (kJ mol –1 ) (J mol –1 K –1 ) (kJ mol –1 ) blank 50.39 0.9910 47.79 –126.9 0.9918 2.597 1 52.84 0.9916 50.22 –137.7 0.9840 2.597 2 76.51 0.9998 73.91 –72.23 0.9971 2.602The corrosion inhibition process also can be explained by using thermodynamic model. The adsorption heat (∆H0) and the adsorption free entropy (∆S0) were calculated by plot of ln⁡(Wcorr/T) versus 1/T according to(8)ln⁡WcorrT=ln⁡RNh+∆S0R-∆H0RTwhere h is the Planck’s constant, N is the Avogadro’s number, T is the absolute temperature, and R is the universal gas constant. Straight lines of ln⁡(Wcorr/T) versus 1/T are plotted in Figure 4 and ∆H and ∆S values from the slope of (-∆H0/R) and an intercept of [(ln⁡(R/Nh)+(∆S0/2.303RT)], respectively, were calculated and also listed in Table 6.Figure 4
Adsorption heat (∆H0) and adsorption free entropy (∆S0) of triazole compounds on the carbon steel surface in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl aqueous solution.The positive values of∆H observed in Table 6 reflect the endothermic nature of the carbon steel dissolution process which is attributed to the slower dissolution of mild steel in the presence of the inhibitor than in its absence. The negative values of ΔS observed for uninhibited and inhibited solution due the activated complex in the rate determining step represent an association rather than dissociation, resulting in a decrease in the randomness on going from the reactants to the activated complex [19]. It was clear from Table 6 data that Ea and ∆H values vary in the same way. The ∆H values were lower than Ea values and it can indicate the corrosion process must involve a gaseous reaction, probably, a hydrogen evolution reaction associated with decrease in total reaction volume. These results fit the known thermodynamic relation between Ea and ∆H described in (9)Ea-∆H=RTIt was found that, for the whole system, the difference is 2.60 kJ mol−1 in HCl medium. This is the approximate value estimated for RT, where T is the range of experimental temperatures.


### 3.3. Electrochemical Experiments

#### 3.3.1. Potentiodynamic Polarization Curves

Figure5 shows the potentiodynamic polarization curves of carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl solution in absence and presence of different concentration of inhibitors at room temperature.Figure 5
Potentiodynamic polarization curves of carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl solution in absence and presence of different concentrations if inhibitor 1 (a) and inhibitor2 (b).
(a) (b)The potentiodynamic polarization curves show the inhibitors presence caused a significant decrease in cathodic and anodic current densities. These results could be explained by the adsorption of inhibitors at the active sites of the electrode surface, which also retards the metallic dissolution and hydrogen evolution and consequently slows the corrosion process. The electrochemical parameters, i.e., the corrosion potential (Ecorr), corrosion current density (jcorr), and the anodic (ba) and cathodic (bc) Tafel constants, shown in Table 7, were obtained from the Tafel plots from Figure 5.Table 7
Electrochemical parameters of carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl aqueous in absence and presence of inhibitors at different concentrations.
Inhibitor Inhibitor Concentration E c o r r j c o r r b c b a I . E . (mg L –1 ) (mV) (mA/cm 2 ) (mV/dec) (mV/dec) ( % ) Blank –496.4 0.6055 180.18 101.74  1 250 –497.6 0.2448 522.42 105.08 60 500 –507.5 0.1157 369.12 98.09 81 750 –496.2 0.0397 134.92 78.77 93 1000 –492.0 0.0295 105.54 62.52 95  2 250 –494.7 0.1305 390.55 128.79 78 500 –493.7 0.0414 132.63 79.09 93 750 –444.1 0.0955 152.75 45.30 84 1000 –495.9 0.0331 167.75 83.58 95The corrosion current density (jcorr) decreases in the presence of both inhibitors (Table 7). There was no remarkable shift in the corrosion potential (Ecorr) value with respect to the blank. According to literature report [20], when corrosion potential is more than ±85 mV with respect to the corrosion potential of the blank, the inhibitor can be considered distinctively as either cathodic or anodic type. However, the maximum displacement in this study is less than ±85 mV. The cathodic (bc) and anodic (ba) Tafel slopes are significantly changed indicating that the inhibition mechanism occurred with the addition of the inhibitors (Table 7), blocking the available cathodic and anodic active sites on the metal surface. The change in cathodic Tafel slopes is larger than that in anodic Tafel slopes, which reveals that inhibitor molecules are adsorbed on both sites but under prominent cathodic control, resulting in the inhibition of anodic dissolution and cathodic reduction. The inhibition efficiency calculated from thejcorr values obtained in the absence and presence of inhibitors varied from 60 to 95% in inhibitor1 and 78 to 95% in inhibitor2, over a concentration range of 250–1000 mg L–1. These results of the inhibition efficiencies revealed a fairly good inhibition action of synthetic inhibitors.


#### 3.3.2. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS)

The corrosion behavior of carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl in the absence and presence of triazole compounds (250–1000 mg L–1) was investigated by EIS after immersion for 1 h at room temperature and Figure 6 illustrates the electrochemical impedance diagrams. The impedance data from EIS experiments done in the absence and presence of increasing inhibitors concentrations were summarized in Table 8.Table 8
Impedance data obtained from Nyquist diagram of carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl solution without and with inhibitors at different concentrations.
Inhibitor Inhibitor Concentration E O C P R c t Rs f m a x C d l Efficiency (mg L –1 ) (V) ( Ω cm –2 ) ( Ω cm –2 ) (Hz) ( μ F cm –2 ) (%) Blank 0 –0.506 17.344 3.599 199.53 45.99 –  1 250 –0.504 145.12 3.881 39.81 27.55 88 500 –0.514 261.85 3.928 19.95 30.46 93 750 –0.505 475.14 4.233 7.94 42.17 96 1000 –0.500 560.42 3.646 7.94 35.75 97  2 250 –0.505 282.00 3.739 12.59 44.83 94 500 –0.509 313.41 3.295 12.59 40.34 94 750 –0.505 426.92 2.762 7.94 46.93 96 1000 –0.505 714.21 3.677 6.31 35.32 98Figure 6
Nyquist diagram of carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl solution without (a) and with inhibitors1 (b) and2 (c) at different concentrations.
(a) (b) (c)The electrochemical impedance diagrams exhibit one depressed capacitive loop, which indicate a single time constant in the absence and presence of the inhibitors, implying two noteworthy effects: the charge transfer resistance considerably increases andfmax decreases when the inhibitors are added. These aforementioned effects decrease the capacitance values, which could be caused by a decrease in the local dielectric constant and/or by a growth in the thickness of the electrical double layer, indicating that the presence of the triazoles compounds changes the electric double-layer structure, which can suggest the inhibitor compounds act by adsorption at the metal/solution interface. The impedance diagrams obtained are not perfect semicircle because of the frequency dispersion of the interfacial impedance. This atypical phenomenon is attributed, in the literature, to the nonhomogeneity of the electrode surface rising from the surface roughness or interfacial phenomena [21, 22].This semicircle intersection with the real axis at high frequencies produces an ohmic resistance (Rs) of nearly 3,6 Ω cm–2 of the solution. The solution resistance (Rs) is close in the absence and presence of the inhibitors compounds. The charge transfer resistance (Rct) was calculated from the variance in impedance at lower and higher frequencies. The double-layer capacitance (Cdl) was obtained using (10)Cdl=12πfmaxRctwhere fmax is the frequency when the imaginary component of the impedance is maximal. A Cdl value of 46.0 μF cm–2 was found for the carbon steel electrode at 1.0 mol L–1 HCl aqueous solution.From Table8, it is clear that the Rct values increased with inhibitor concentration increment, which implies a reduction in the active surface area derived by the adsorption of the inhibitors on the carbon steel surface and indicates the corrosion process turned to be hindered. This assumption is supported by the anodic and cathodic polarization curves results. The inhibition efficiency obtained from the Rct values in the absence and presence of inhibitors varied from 88 to 97% in inhibitor1 and 94 to 98% in inhibitor2, over a concentration range of 250–1000 mg L–1.


## 3.1. Inhibitor Synthesis and Characterization

Synthetic route proposed to obtain triazoles compounds was presented in Scheme1. Briefly, the reaction ofp-nitroaniline (4) with sodium nitrite in acidic medium and addition of sodium azide was used to obtain compound5 [12]. The intermediate5 was reacted with ethyl acetoacetate in the presence of triethylamine to obtain compound7 [13]. Compound8was obtained from reaction of intermediate6 with propargyl alcohol catalyzed by Cu+ [12] and compound9from reaction of intermediate6 with acetoacetone in the presence of triethylamine [13]. Compounds3 and1 were obtained from respective reaction of6,7, and8 with zinc in presence of ammonium chloride and water or Pd/C with ammonium formate [14]. Compound2 was obtained from reaction of compound8with sodium borohydride in the presence of copper sulphate [15].Scheme 1
Synthetic route to triazole derivatives compounds3–8: (a) (1) HCl/NaNO3  (2) NaN3; (b) Ethyl Acetoacetate, Et3N, DMF; (c) Pd/C, ammonium formate; (d) (1) Ascorbic Acid, CuSO4.5H2O, NaHCO3 (2) Propargylic Alcohol; (e) Zn, NH4Cl/H2O; (f) Et3N, Acetylacetone; (g) NaBH4/MeOH, Cu2SO4.5H2O.The products were obtained using synthetic route using ready available nonexpensive commercial reagents and without any further purification of any product or intermediate. Products were obtained in good purity as observed in infrared and RMN analysis and yields of all synthetic steps were good varying between 60 and 94%.


## 3.2. Gravimetric Weight Loss Measurements

In an electrochemical spontaneous corrosion process, when the metal interacts with electrolyte solution, both anodic and cathodic reactions occur. Corrosion mechanism of carbon steel in acid solution can happen by reaction between metallic iron and H+ producing ferrous ion (Fe2+) and hydrogen gas, shown as follows [16]:Fe + H→ [FeHads]+[FeHads]+ + e-→ [FeHads][FeHads] + H+ + e-→ Fe + H2Fe→ Fe2+ + 2e-The inhibition efficiency obtained from weight loss experiments with carbon steel in acid medium is presented in Table1. An imidazoline based commercial corrosion inhibitor was used in same concentration to compare the inhibition efficiency of proposed inhibitors.Table 1
Inhibitor efficiencies to carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl solution containing 250 mg L–1 of commercial and proposed inhibitors after immersion for 24 h at 25°C.
Inhibitor I . E .  (%) Error (%) 1 91.9 1.3 2 95.8 0.7 3 70.2 1.3 Commercial 72.2 1.9The data from Table1 suggest that the triazole compounds behave as corrosion inhibitors and that their inhibition efficiency remains high through long periods of immersion (24 h) for low inhibitor concentration. Inhibitors1 and2 showed the best inhibitions efficiencies (greater than 90%) with a relative standard deviation lower than 2%. Analyzing this result, we can hypothesize that the hydroxyl group present in both compounds1 and2 and absent in compound3 could be an important group with anticorrosive activity. Additional studies, as molecular docking between the synthesized inhibitors and the metal alloy, should be done in order to understand the structure–activity relationships for the synthesized triazole corrosion inhibitors. Therefore, we chose inhibitors1 and2 to carry out further corrosion assays and try to explain the corrosion inhibition mechanism.The rates of carbon steel corrosion in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl aqueous solution, in the presence and absence of the best inhibitors, in concentration range of 250–1250 mg L–1 for 24 h immersion at 25°C, as well as the efficiency results, are shown in Table 2.Table 2
Inhibitor efficiencies and corrosion rates to carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl solution with different concentrations of inhibitors, after immersion for 24 h at 25°C.
Inhibitor Concentration (mg L –1 ) Inhibitor 1 Inhibitor 2 Commercial Inhibitor W I . E . Error W I . E . Error W I . E . Error (mm/y) (%) (%) (mm/y) (%) (%) (mm/y) (%) (%) Blank 12.8 – – 12.8 – – 12.8 – – 250 1.0 91.9 1.3 0.5 95.8 0.7 2.2 72.2 1.9 500 0.9 93.4 0.3 0.4 96.7 0.3 1.3 82.9 1.2 750 0.7 94.3 0.8 0.6 95.5 5.5 1.3 83.1 0.9 1000 0.6 95.0 0.5 0.2 98.2 0.3 1.3 83.9 0.7 1250 0.5 96.2 0.2 0.1 99.2 0.2 0.8 84.1 0.5The carbon steel corrosion rate (W) shown in Table 2 was significantly reduced with addition of the inhibitors. Those results show the inhibitory effect of the triazole compounds against carbon steel corrosion in low pH solutions. Furthermore, the inhibition efficiency grew when the concentration of triazole compounds in this medium increased. It has also been observed that the inhibition efficiencies of compound2 are higher when compared to those of compound1.The corrosion process was also investigated in different immersion time of carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl aqueous solution in presence and absence of 500 mg L–1 of inhibitors (4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h) at room temperature and the results of the weight loss measurements are shown in Table 3.Table 3
Inhibitor efficiencies and corrosion rates to carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl aqueous solution in presence and absence of the inhibitor (500 mg L−1) with different immersion times, at 25°C.
Immersion Time (h) Blank Inhibitor 1 Inhibitor 2 W W I . E. Error W I . E . Error (mm/y) (mm/y) ( % ) ( % ) (mm/y) ( % ) ( % ) 4 16.0 1.7 89.2 1.5 0.3 97.9 0.6 8 14.7 1.8 87.5 1.9 0.3 97.9 0.2 12 14.7 1.6 88.8 0.7 0.2 98.7 0.5 24 12.8 0.9 93.4 0.3 0.4 96.7 0.3 48 14.2 1.6 88.6 1.2 0.3 97.9 0.2It can be observed in Table3 that in solutions without inhibitor the uniform corrosion rate is very severe for all immersion times (varying of 16.0 mm/y to 12.8 mm/y) and the rate was greatly reduced with the addition of the inhibitors for all immersion times, reaching 0.9 mm/y and 0.4 mm/y in the presence of the inhibitors with 24 h of immersion. These corrosion rates are considered low, according to Gentil (for cheap materials, like carbon steel, the corrosion rate could be acceptable in the range of 0.225 to 1.5 mm/y) [17].Corrosion rate reduction in presence of inhibitors occurs due to the formation of protective layer by inhibitor adsorption on the metallic surface. To investigate the adsorption behavior of triazole compounds, various isotherms were used and Langmuir isotherm was the best fit with the experimental data from Table2. Langmuir isotherm was obtained from linear correlation between the level of surface coating (θ) and inhibitor concentration (C). The adsorption isotherm used is plotted assuming that all adsorption sites are equivalent and that binding of particles is unaffected by any nearby occupied or unoccupied locations. In accordance with this isotherm, θ/C is related to C by (5)Cθ=C+1Kwhere K is the adsorption equilibrium constant. Figure 2 shows the relationship between C/θ and the concentration of inhibitors.Figure 2
Langmuir adsorption isotherms of triazole compounds on the carbon steel surface in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl aqueous solution.A linear correlation can be observed in Figure2 with significant correlation coefficients (r), showing the validity of the isotherm (Table 4). The curve slope is near the unity, which can suggest that the inhibitor adsorbed molecules form a monolayer on carbon steel surface. The adsorption constant (K) was calculated from the Langmuir intercept and related to the standard Gibbs free energy (∆Gads0) according to (6)K=155.55exp⁡-∆Gads0RTwhere R is the universal gas constant, T is the absolute temperature, and 55.55 mol L–1 is the water molar concentration in solution. Table 4 shows the values of the slope (α), the correlation coefficient (r) of the Langmuir isotherm, the adsorption constant (K), and the standard Gibbs free energy (∆Gads0).Table 4
Values of theα and r of the Langmuir isotherm, K, and ∆Gads0 obtained for the corrosion inhibitors.
Inhibitor Parameters of Langmuir isotherm α r K (L mmol –1 ) Δ G a d s 0 (KJ mol –1 ) 1 1.027 0.9999 9.25 –33.6 2 0.998 0.9991 11.36 –33.1The∆Gads0 values obtained from (6) were −33.6 and 33.1 kJ mol−1 to compounds1 and2, respectively. Generally, values of ∆Gads0 greater than −20 kJ mol−1 indicate electrostatic interactions attributed to inhibition interaction between the charged compounds and the charged metal surface (physisorption) and values equal or smaller than −40 kJ mol−1 are related to electrons share or electrons transfer from organic molecules of the inhibitor to the metal surface, forming a coordinate bond (chemisorption). In accordance with the ∆Gads0 values obtained, it can be hypothesized that the adsorption of both compounds is not only by physisorption or chemisorption but by obeying a comprehensive adsorption (chemisorption and physisorption). It is difficult to differentiate between chemisorption and physisorption based only on these criteria, particularly when charged species are adsorbed.The effects of temperature on the corrosion of carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl solution in absence and presence of 250 mg L–1 of inhibitors were studied during 4 h, varying temperatures (25, 35, 45, and 55°C). The corrosion rates and inhibitor efficiencies obtained in this study were presented in Table 5.Table 5
Inhibitor efficiencies and corrosion rates to carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl aqueous solution in absence and presence of 250 mg L–1 of inhibitors during 4 h, varying temperatures.
Temperature Inhibitor W I . E . Error ( C   ∘ ) (mm/y) ( % ) ( % ) 25 Blank 16.0 − − 1 1.7 89.2 1.5 2 0.3 97.9 0.6  35 Blank 33.6 − − 1 3.6 89.4 0.6 2 0.8 97.6 1.6  45 Blank 66.1 − − 1 5.9 91.1 0.4 2 2.3 96.5 0.2  55 Blank 99.8 − − 1 13.0 87.0 0.3 2 5.4 94.6 0.3Table5 shows that in solutions without inhibitor the corrosion process is accentuated and increased with the temperature (varying of 16.0 mm/y to 99.8 mm/y). It can be observed that corrosion rate reduces with the addition of the inhibitors for all temperatures, in the presence of the inhibitors, and inhibition efficiencies increase. These inhibition efficiencies stay high even at high temperatures (87.0% ±0.3% and 94.6% ±0.3% at 55°C).The apparent activation energy for carbon steel corrosion in absence and presence of 250 mg L–1 of inhibitors was determined from an Arrhenius-type plot according to (7)ln⁡Wcorr=-EaRT+ln⁡Awhere Wcorr is corrosion rate, Ea is activation energy, A is the frequency factor, T is the absolute temperature, and R is the molar gas constant. Arrhenius plots of ln⁡Wcorr versus 1/T in the absence and presence of 250 mg L–1 of inhibitors are shown in Figure 3.Figure 3
Arrhenius plots ofln⁡Wcorr versus 1/T in the absence and presence of 250 mg L–1 of inhibitors compounds.The apparent activation energy obtained for the corrosion process in the acid solution was 49.7 kJ mol–1 and in the acid solution in presence of1 and2 inhibitors were 55.2 and 78.8 kJ mol–1, respectively (Table 6). It was clear that apparent activation energy increase with the presence of inhibitors compounds indicates the physical adsorption mechanism [18].Table 6
Thermodynamic parameters of corrosion inhibition process of carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl solution in absence and presence of inhibitors.
Inhibitor E a r 2 Δ H Δ S r 2 E a - Δ H (kJ mol –1 ) (kJ mol –1 ) (J mol –1 K –1 ) (kJ mol –1 ) blank 50.39 0.9910 47.79 –126.9 0.9918 2.597 1 52.84 0.9916 50.22 –137.7 0.9840 2.597 2 76.51 0.9998 73.91 –72.23 0.9971 2.602The corrosion inhibition process also can be explained by using thermodynamic model. The adsorption heat (∆H0) and the adsorption free entropy (∆S0) were calculated by plot of ln⁡(Wcorr/T) versus 1/T according to(8)ln⁡WcorrT=ln⁡RNh+∆S0R-∆H0RTwhere h is the Planck’s constant, N is the Avogadro’s number, T is the absolute temperature, and R is the universal gas constant. Straight lines of ln⁡(Wcorr/T) versus 1/T are plotted in Figure 4 and ∆H and ∆S values from the slope of (-∆H0/R) and an intercept of [(ln⁡(R/Nh)+(∆S0/2.303RT)], respectively, were calculated and also listed in Table 6.Figure 4
Adsorption heat (∆H0) and adsorption free entropy (∆S0) of triazole compounds on the carbon steel surface in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl aqueous solution.The positive values of∆H observed in Table 6 reflect the endothermic nature of the carbon steel dissolution process which is attributed to the slower dissolution of mild steel in the presence of the inhibitor than in its absence. The negative values of ΔS observed for uninhibited and inhibited solution due the activated complex in the rate determining step represent an association rather than dissociation, resulting in a decrease in the randomness on going from the reactants to the activated complex [19]. It was clear from Table 6 data that Ea and ∆H values vary in the same way. The ∆H values were lower than Ea values and it can indicate the corrosion process must involve a gaseous reaction, probably, a hydrogen evolution reaction associated with decrease in total reaction volume. These results fit the known thermodynamic relation between Ea and ∆H described in (9)Ea-∆H=RTIt was found that, for the whole system, the difference is 2.60 kJ mol−1 in HCl medium. This is the approximate value estimated for RT, where T is the range of experimental temperatures.


## 3.3. Electrochemical Experiments

### 3.3.1. Potentiodynamic Polarization Curves

Figure5 shows the potentiodynamic polarization curves of carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl solution in absence and presence of different concentration of inhibitors at room temperature.Figure 5
Potentiodynamic polarization curves of carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl solution in absence and presence of different concentrations if inhibitor 1 (a) and inhibitor2 (b).
(a) (b)The potentiodynamic polarization curves show the inhibitors presence caused a significant decrease in cathodic and anodic current densities. These results could be explained by the adsorption of inhibitors at the active sites of the electrode surface, which also retards the metallic dissolution and hydrogen evolution and consequently slows the corrosion process. The electrochemical parameters, i.e., the corrosion potential (Ecorr), corrosion current density (jcorr), and the anodic (ba) and cathodic (bc) Tafel constants, shown in Table 7, were obtained from the Tafel plots from Figure 5.Table 7
Electrochemical parameters of carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl aqueous in absence and presence of inhibitors at different concentrations.
Inhibitor Inhibitor Concentration E c o r r j c o r r b c b a I . E . (mg L –1 ) (mV) (mA/cm 2 ) (mV/dec) (mV/dec) ( % ) Blank –496.4 0.6055 180.18 101.74  1 250 –497.6 0.2448 522.42 105.08 60 500 –507.5 0.1157 369.12 98.09 81 750 –496.2 0.0397 134.92 78.77 93 1000 –492.0 0.0295 105.54 62.52 95  2 250 –494.7 0.1305 390.55 128.79 78 500 –493.7 0.0414 132.63 79.09 93 750 –444.1 0.0955 152.75 45.30 84 1000 –495.9 0.0331 167.75 83.58 95The corrosion current density (jcorr) decreases in the presence of both inhibitors (Table 7). There was no remarkable shift in the corrosion potential (Ecorr) value with respect to the blank. According to literature report [20], when corrosion potential is more than ±85 mV with respect to the corrosion potential of the blank, the inhibitor can be considered distinctively as either cathodic or anodic type. However, the maximum displacement in this study is less than ±85 mV. The cathodic (bc) and anodic (ba) Tafel slopes are significantly changed indicating that the inhibition mechanism occurred with the addition of the inhibitors (Table 7), blocking the available cathodic and anodic active sites on the metal surface. The change in cathodic Tafel slopes is larger than that in anodic Tafel slopes, which reveals that inhibitor molecules are adsorbed on both sites but under prominent cathodic control, resulting in the inhibition of anodic dissolution and cathodic reduction. The inhibition efficiency calculated from thejcorr values obtained in the absence and presence of inhibitors varied from 60 to 95% in inhibitor1 and 78 to 95% in inhibitor2, over a concentration range of 250–1000 mg L–1. These results of the inhibition efficiencies revealed a fairly good inhibition action of synthetic inhibitors.


### 3.3.2. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS)

The corrosion behavior of carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl in the absence and presence of triazole compounds (250–1000 mg L–1) was investigated by EIS after immersion for 1 h at room temperature and Figure 6 illustrates the electrochemical impedance diagrams. The impedance data from EIS experiments done in the absence and presence of increasing inhibitors concentrations were summarized in Table 8.Table 8
Impedance data obtained from Nyquist diagram of carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl solution without and with inhibitors at different concentrations.
Inhibitor Inhibitor Concentration E O C P R c t Rs f m a x C d l Efficiency (mg L –1 ) (V) ( Ω cm –2 ) ( Ω cm –2 ) (Hz) ( μ F cm –2 ) (%) Blank 0 –0.506 17.344 3.599 199.53 45.99 –  1 250 –0.504 145.12 3.881 39.81 27.55 88 500 –0.514 261.85 3.928 19.95 30.46 93 750 –0.505 475.14 4.233 7.94 42.17 96 1000 –0.500 560.42 3.646 7.94 35.75 97  2 250 –0.505 282.00 3.739 12.59 44.83 94 500 –0.509 313.41 3.295 12.59 40.34 94 750 –0.505 426.92 2.762 7.94 46.93 96 1000 –0.505 714.21 3.677 6.31 35.32 98Figure 6
Nyquist diagram of carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl solution without (a) and with inhibitors1 (b) and2 (c) at different concentrations.
(a) (b) (c)The electrochemical impedance diagrams exhibit one depressed capacitive loop, which indicate a single time constant in the absence and presence of the inhibitors, implying two noteworthy effects: the charge transfer resistance considerably increases andfmax decreases when the inhibitors are added. These aforementioned effects decrease the capacitance values, which could be caused by a decrease in the local dielectric constant and/or by a growth in the thickness of the electrical double layer, indicating that the presence of the triazoles compounds changes the electric double-layer structure, which can suggest the inhibitor compounds act by adsorption at the metal/solution interface. The impedance diagrams obtained are not perfect semicircle because of the frequency dispersion of the interfacial impedance. This atypical phenomenon is attributed, in the literature, to the nonhomogeneity of the electrode surface rising from the surface roughness or interfacial phenomena [21, 22].This semicircle intersection with the real axis at high frequencies produces an ohmic resistance (Rs) of nearly 3,6 Ω cm–2 of the solution. The solution resistance (Rs) is close in the absence and presence of the inhibitors compounds. The charge transfer resistance (Rct) was calculated from the variance in impedance at lower and higher frequencies. The double-layer capacitance (Cdl) was obtained using (10)Cdl=12πfmaxRctwhere fmax is the frequency when the imaginary component of the impedance is maximal. A Cdl value of 46.0 μF cm–2 was found for the carbon steel electrode at 1.0 mol L–1 HCl aqueous solution.From Table8, it is clear that the Rct values increased with inhibitor concentration increment, which implies a reduction in the active surface area derived by the adsorption of the inhibitors on the carbon steel surface and indicates the corrosion process turned to be hindered. This assumption is supported by the anodic and cathodic polarization curves results. The inhibition efficiency obtained from the Rct values in the absence and presence of inhibitors varied from 88 to 97% in inhibitor1 and 94 to 98% in inhibitor2, over a concentration range of 250–1000 mg L–1.


## 3.3.1. Potentiodynamic Polarization Curves

Figure5 shows the potentiodynamic polarization curves of carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl solution in absence and presence of different concentration of inhibitors at room temperature.Figure 5
Potentiodynamic polarization curves of carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl solution in absence and presence of different concentrations if inhibitor 1 (a) and inhibitor2 (b).
(a) (b)The potentiodynamic polarization curves show the inhibitors presence caused a significant decrease in cathodic and anodic current densities. These results could be explained by the adsorption of inhibitors at the active sites of the electrode surface, which also retards the metallic dissolution and hydrogen evolution and consequently slows the corrosion process. The electrochemical parameters, i.e., the corrosion potential (Ecorr), corrosion current density (jcorr), and the anodic (ba) and cathodic (bc) Tafel constants, shown in Table 7, were obtained from the Tafel plots from Figure 5.Table 7
Electrochemical parameters of carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl aqueous in absence and presence of inhibitors at different concentrations.
Inhibitor Inhibitor Concentration E c o r r j c o r r b c b a I . E . (mg L –1 ) (mV) (mA/cm 2 ) (mV/dec) (mV/dec) ( % ) Blank –496.4 0.6055 180.18 101.74  1 250 –497.6 0.2448 522.42 105.08 60 500 –507.5 0.1157 369.12 98.09 81 750 –496.2 0.0397 134.92 78.77 93 1000 –492.0 0.0295 105.54 62.52 95  2 250 –494.7 0.1305 390.55 128.79 78 500 –493.7 0.0414 132.63 79.09 93 750 –444.1 0.0955 152.75 45.30 84 1000 –495.9 0.0331 167.75 83.58 95The corrosion current density (jcorr) decreases in the presence of both inhibitors (Table 7). There was no remarkable shift in the corrosion potential (Ecorr) value with respect to the blank. According to literature report [20], when corrosion potential is more than ±85 mV with respect to the corrosion potential of the blank, the inhibitor can be considered distinctively as either cathodic or anodic type. However, the maximum displacement in this study is less than ±85 mV. The cathodic (bc) and anodic (ba) Tafel slopes are significantly changed indicating that the inhibition mechanism occurred with the addition of the inhibitors (Table 7), blocking the available cathodic and anodic active sites on the metal surface. The change in cathodic Tafel slopes is larger than that in anodic Tafel slopes, which reveals that inhibitor molecules are adsorbed on both sites but under prominent cathodic control, resulting in the inhibition of anodic dissolution and cathodic reduction. The inhibition efficiency calculated from thejcorr values obtained in the absence and presence of inhibitors varied from 60 to 95% in inhibitor1 and 78 to 95% in inhibitor2, over a concentration range of 250–1000 mg L–1. These results of the inhibition efficiencies revealed a fairly good inhibition action of synthetic inhibitors.


## 3.3.2. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS)

The corrosion behavior of carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl in the absence and presence of triazole compounds (250–1000 mg L–1) was investigated by EIS after immersion for 1 h at room temperature and Figure 6 illustrates the electrochemical impedance diagrams. The impedance data from EIS experiments done in the absence and presence of increasing inhibitors concentrations were summarized in Table 8.Table 8
Impedance data obtained from Nyquist diagram of carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl solution without and with inhibitors at different concentrations.
Inhibitor Inhibitor Concentration E O C P R c t Rs f m a x C d l Efficiency (mg L –1 ) (V) ( Ω cm –2 ) ( Ω cm –2 ) (Hz) ( μ F cm –2 ) (%) Blank 0 –0.506 17.344 3.599 199.53 45.99 –  1 250 –0.504 145.12 3.881 39.81 27.55 88 500 –0.514 261.85 3.928 19.95 30.46 93 750 –0.505 475.14 4.233 7.94 42.17 96 1000 –0.500 560.42 3.646 7.94 35.75 97  2 250 –0.505 282.00 3.739 12.59 44.83 94 500 –0.509 313.41 3.295 12.59 40.34 94 750 –0.505 426.92 2.762 7.94 46.93 96 1000 –0.505 714.21 3.677 6.31 35.32 98Figure 6
Nyquist diagram of carbon steel in 1.0 mol L–1 HCl solution without (a) and with inhibitors1 (b) and2 (c) at different concentrations.
(a) (b) (c)The electrochemical impedance diagrams exhibit one depressed capacitive loop, which indicate a single time constant in the absence and presence of the inhibitors, implying two noteworthy effects: the charge transfer resistance considerably increases andfmax decreases when the inhibitors are added. These aforementioned effects decrease the capacitance values, which could be caused by a decrease in the local dielectric constant and/or by a growth in the thickness of the electrical double layer, indicating that the presence of the triazoles compounds changes the electric double-layer structure, which can suggest the inhibitor compounds act by adsorption at the metal/solution interface. The impedance diagrams obtained are not perfect semicircle because of the frequency dispersion of the interfacial impedance. This atypical phenomenon is attributed, in the literature, to the nonhomogeneity of the electrode surface rising from the surface roughness or interfacial phenomena [21, 22].This semicircle intersection with the real axis at high frequencies produces an ohmic resistance (Rs) of nearly 3,6 Ω cm–2 of the solution. The solution resistance (Rs) is close in the absence and presence of the inhibitors compounds. The charge transfer resistance (Rct) was calculated from the variance in impedance at lower and higher frequencies. The double-layer capacitance (Cdl) was obtained using (10)Cdl=12πfmaxRctwhere fmax is the frequency when the imaginary component of the impedance is maximal. A Cdl value of 46.0 μF cm–2 was found for the carbon steel electrode at 1.0 mol L–1 HCl aqueous solution.From Table8, it is clear that the Rct values increased with inhibitor concentration increment, which implies a reduction in the active surface area derived by the adsorption of the inhibitors on the carbon steel surface and indicates the corrosion process turned to be hindered. This assumption is supported by the anodic and cathodic polarization curves results. The inhibition efficiency obtained from the Rct values in the absence and presence of inhibitors varied from 88 to 97% in inhibitor1 and 94 to 98% in inhibitor2, over a concentration range of 250–1000 mg L–1.


## 4. Conclusions

The synthesis of triazoles compound following an easy, low cost, and simplified synthetic route gave good corrosion inhibitors. For this purpose, a range of 250 to 1000 mg L−1 was applied in weight loss and electrochemical assays in acid media for ASTM 1020 carbon steel. These assays showed some relevant inhibition efficiency (> 90%) for named inhibitors1 and2. From Langmuir isotherm the adsorption of inhibitors on the carbon steel surface might occur by physical and chemical interaction; however, the activation energy raised suggesting a physisorption process for the interaction of the inhibitor on the carbon steel surface.For the future, our perspective is the addition of an amount of these inhibitors in commercial anticorrosive inks.



---

*Source: 6759478-2019-01-22.xml*