# Synthesis and Preliminary Characterization of a PPE-Type Polymer Containing Substituted Fullerenes and Transition Metal Ligation Sites

Authors: Corinne A. Basinger; Kaitlin Sullivan; Sarah Siemer; Stuart Oehrle; Keith A. Walters
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

A substituted fullerene was incorporated into a PPE-conjugated polymer repeat unit. This subunit was then polymerized via Sonogashira coupling with other repeat units to create polymeric systems approaching 50 repeat units (based on GPC characterization). Bipyridine ligands were incorporated into some of these repeat units to provide sites for transition metal coordination. Photophysical characterization of the absorption and emission properties of these systems shows excited states located on both the fullerene and aromatic backbone of the polymers that exist in a thermally controlled equilibrium. Future work will explore other substituted polyaromatic systems using similar methodologies.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Since their discovery, fullerenes have been a focus of photochemistry and molecular electronics for their unique properties, and our group has been interested for many years in their incorporation into supramolecular systems [1–3]. Our focus has been the substituted fullerene1 (Scheme 1) that provides a simple “handle” for attachment to other moieties [4–6]. Our initial efforts focused on small molecule systems incorporating well-known transition metal chromophores (e.g., –ReI(CO)3Cl and –RuIIbpy22+, where bpy is 2,2′-bipyridine) [7–9] that exhibited unique photophysical properties, including photoinduced charge transfer [6]. These charge transfer capabilities have been further confirmed withab initio calculations [10]. Of particular interest is our ultimate design to prepare fullerene/transition metal sensitizers for solar cells [11–17].Scheme 1
Structure of substituted fullerene1.Although our small molecule work produced interesting results, the ultimate goal of our research is to produce polymeric systems containing these moieties and understanding their photoinduced excited-state behavior. While there has been considerable interest in the research community that incorporate fullerene C60 into π-conjugated polymeric systems for nearly a decade (some containing transition metal chromophores) [18–35], these systems use relatively complicated structures that do not facilitate efficient electronic communication between the two moieties [36, 37]. In contrast, our relatively simple synthetic strategy provides a more robust connection between the subunits and presumably more efficient electronic interactions.Herein we report our recent synthetic efforts to incorporate1 into π-conjugated polyphenyleneethynylene- (PPE-) type polymeric systems. These polymers represent systems containing pendant fullerenes (described by others as “bucky ball fishing”) [27], which provides a nice balance of fullerene loading and a well-defined repeat structure. Key to these efforts is the design of repeat unit2 (Scheme 2) that connects1 to an aromatic “hub” with two halides that can be utilized in polymerization reactions involving Sonogashira coupling [38]. Dialkynes needed for the coupling reaction will provide ligation points for transition metal chromophores through the incorporation of a 2,2′-bipyridyl moiety within the repeat unit (4, Scheme 4). Alternatively, substituted benzene (3, Scheme 3) can instead be polymerized to provide a variety of polymeric options with varying moieties present (5,6, and7, Scheme 4). Along with preliminary photophysical characterization of these systems, we report efforts to characterize molecular weights of these fullerene-containing systems via gel permeation chromatography (GPC).Scheme 2
Synthesis of polymer repeat2. Reaction conditions: (a) palladium catalyst, CuI, Et3N, toluene, and TMS acetylene; (b) THF, NaOH, and MeOH; (c) palladium catalyst, CuI, Et3N,1, and toluene.Scheme 3
Synthesis of polymer repeat3. Reaction conditions: (a) palladium catalyst, CuI, Et3N, toluene, and TMS acetylene; (b) THF, NaOH, and MeOH.Scheme 4
Synthesis of polymers5–7. General reaction conditions: palladium catalyst, CuI, Et3N, and THF.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials and Instrumentation

C60 and C70 standards were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All solvents used were of HPLC grade or higher. Individual polystyrene standards used for gel permeation chromatography (GPC) were from Waters Corporation (Milford, MA, USA) and were at a molecular weight of 456, 1050, 5970, and 2630 g/mol. These standards were prepared at a concentration of 0.2% (by weight) in tetrahydrofuran (THF) individually.Chemicals were purchased from Aldrich, Alfa Aesar, GFS, and Spectra Group Limited and used as received unless otherwise indicated. Compounds1,4, and10 were prepared as previously reported [4, 6, 39]. Molecular characterization is based on spectra data (1H NMR, IR) and physical data reported in previous documented procedures for the smaller subunits. Spectroscopic instrumentation utilized is identical to that reported previously [6].


### 2.2. Synthesis of Central Hub Precursor (8)

In a 100.0 mL Schlenk flask equipped with a stir bar, 1,3-dibromo-5-iodobenzene (0.5000 g, 1.382 mmol), PdCl2(PPh3)2 (0.0479 g, 0.0682 mmol), and CuI (0.4057 g, 2.130 mmol) were added. This flask was connected to a condenser and then purged and filled with argon. Through the sidearm of the condenser, 7.0 mL of distilled triethylamine was added via a purged and filled airtight syringe. 10.0 mL of distilled toluene was added in the same manner. Approximately 10.0 mL of trimethylsilylacetylene (TMS acetylene) was bubbled with argon for about 10 min to remove oxygen; then a portion (0.2164 mL, 1.520 mmol) was added via airtight syringe to the reaction mixture. The reaction flask was lowered into an oil bath and heated to 80°C. The reaction refluxed for 20 hours. After reflux, the solvent was removed from the black grainy solution via rotary evaporation. The remaining solid was extracted with 10 mL of ethyl acetate and sonication for 10 minutes. The mixture was then filtered and washed with ethyl acetate. A brownish/gray solid was filtered out and the brown filtrate was rotovapped to produce product8 in quantitative yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.25 (s, 9H), 7.51 (dd, Ph, 2H), 7.58 (s, Ph, 1H).


### 2.3. Deprotection of8 (9)

In a 250 mL round bottom flask equipped with a stir bar,8 (0.2380 g, 0.7166 mmol), 20.0 mL distilled and degassed THF, 6.0 mL of 20% (w/v) NaOH solution, and 37.0 mL of methanol were added. The solution was stirred vigorously for 2 hours at room temperature, producing an orange solution. Once the stirring was complete, 50 mL of water was added to the flask producing a white cloudy precipitate. Following the addition of 40 mL of chloroform, the mixture was filtered to remove the white precipitate. The filtrate was then placed in a separatory funnel and the organic layer collected. Following drying with sodium sulfate, the solution was rotovapped to produce yellowish/orange solid9 in quantitative yield. IR (ATR, cm−1) 1744.38, 1764.81, 2847.67, 2921.23, 3060.161, 3284.90. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.16 (s, acetylene, H), 7.54 (bs, Ph, 2H), 7.64 (s, Ph, H).


### 2.4. Attachment of Substituted Fullerene1 to9 (2)

In a 100 mL Schlenk flask9 (0.0145 g, 0.0558 mmol),1 [4, 6] (0.0423 g, 0.0468 mmol), PdCl2(PPh3)2 (0.008 g, 0.0114 mmol), and CuI (0.065 g, 0.3413 mmol) were added along with a stir bar. A condenser was added, and the apparatus was purged and filled with argon. Through the top of the condenser, 7.0 mL of distilled trimethylamine and 10.0 mL of distilled toluene were added via a purged and filled airtight syringe. The apparatus was lowered into an 80°C oil bath and heated for 24 hours. The solvent was removed from the reaction mixture via rotary evaporation, and the dark reddish brown oily solid was extracted with 10 mL of ethyl acetate and 10 minutes of sonication. The remaining solid was removed via filtration, and the filtrate was rotovapped to produce crude product2 as a brownish oil. The product was purified via medium pressure liquid chromatography (MPLC) on silica. The product eluted at 70 : 30 hexanes : ethyl acetate, yield 46%. IR (ATR, cm−1) 788.20, 1008.85, 1258.12, 2966.17. 1H NMR (500 MHz, C6D6) δ 5.28 (s, CH2, 2H), 5.30 (s, CH2, 2H), 7.03 (d, Ph, 1H), 7.05 (dd, Ph, 1H), 7.67 (bs, Ph, 1H), 7.69 (dd, Ph, 2H), 7.70 (s, Ph, 1H).


### 2.5. Synthesis of 1,4-Dimethoxy-2,5-[bis-trimethylsilylacetyl]benzene (11)

In a 100.0 mL Schlenk flask equipped with a stir bar,10 (0.2500 g, 0.641 mmol), PdCl2(PPh3)2 (0.0442 g, 0.0632 mmol), and CuI (0.3762 g, 1.976 mmol) were added. A condenser was added, and the apparatus was purged and filled with argon. Through the sidearm of the flask, 5.0 mL of distilled triethylamine and 10.0 mL of distilled toluene were added via a purged and filled airtight syringe. Lastly, 15 mL of TMS acetylene was placed in a small round bottom flask and was degassed with argon for about 10 min before it was added through the sidearm of the Schlenk flask (0.1916 mL, 1.346 mmol) with a purged and filled airtight syringe. The apparatus was lowered into an 80°C oil bath and heated for 24 hours. The solvent was removed from the light orange reaction mixture via rotary evaporation, and the solid was extracted with 10 mL of ethyl acetate and 10 minutes of sonication. The remaining solid was removed via filtration, and the filtrate was rotovapped to produce crude product11 as a grayish/gold solid. The product was purified via MPLC on silica. The product eluted at 70 : 30 hexanes : ethyl acetate in quantitative yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.21 (s, CH3, 18H), 3.76 (s, OCH3, 6H), 6.86 (s, Ph, 2H).


### 2.6. Deprotection of11 (3)

In a 250 mL round bottom flask equipped with a stir bar,11 (0.0694 g, 0.2099 mmol), 11.6 mL distilled THF, 3.6 mL of 20% (w/v) NaOH solution, and 21.7 mL of methanol were added. The solution was stirred vigorously for 2 hours at room temperature, producing a clear solution. Once the stirring was complete, 50 mL of water and 40 mL of chloroform were added to the flask producing a white precipitate. The precipitate was removed via filtration, and the filtrate was placed in a separatory funnel. The organic layer was collected and dried with sodium sulfate. Removal of the solvent produced crude product3 as a light brownish/yellow solid. The crude product was purified via MPLC on silica. The product eluted at 92 : 8 hexanes : ethyl acetate, 34% yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.39 (s, acetylene, 2H), 3.80 (s, OCH3, 6H), 6.96 (s, Ph, 2H).


### 2.7. Polymerization of2 and3 (5)

In a 100.0 mL Schlenk flask equipped with a stir bar,2 (0.0583 g, 0.0538 mmol),3 (0.0100 g, 0.0538 mmol), PdCl2(PPh3)2 (0.00189 g, 0.00267 mmol), and CuI (0.000500 g, 0.00267 mmol) were added. This flask was connected to a condenser and then purged and filled with argon. Through the sidearm of the flask, 5.00 mL of distilled triethylamine and 14.0 mL of distilled THF were added via a purged and filled syringe. The flask was lowered into a 70°C oil bath and stirred for 24 hours. Following completion, the solvent was removed via rotary evaporation to produce a brownish/orange oily solid, polymer5. This solid was sequentially extracted with hot acetone and hexanes, and solids were rotovapped from each wash. The remaining solid (25 mg), acetone extraction (15.9 mg), and hexanes extraction (18.9 mg) were analyzed via GPC. The product was found in the acetone wash. 1H NMR (500 MHz, C6D6) δ 3.70 (s, Acetylene, 2H), 3.80 (s, OCH3, 6H), 6.96 (s, Ph, 2H), 3.89 (s, CH2, 2H), 3.91 (s, CH2, 2H).


### 2.8. Polymerization of2 and4 (6)

In a 100.0 mL Schlenk flask equipped with a stir bar,2 (0.0950 g, 0.0876 mmol),4 (0.0135 g, 0.0876 mmol), PdCl2(PPh3)2 (0.00307 g, 0.00438 mmol), and CuI (0.000834 g, 0.00438 mmol) were added. This flask was connected to a condenser and then purged and filled with argon. Through the sidearm of the flask, 5.00 mL of distilled triethylamine and 14.0 mL of distilled THF were added via a purged and filled airtight syringe. The flask was lowered into a 70°C oil bath and stirred for 21 hours. Following completion, the solvent was removed via rotary evaporation to produce a brownish/orange oily solid, polymer6. The solid was sequentially extracted with hot acetone and hexanes, and solids were rotovapped from each wash. The remaining solid following extractions was purified further via MPLC on silica. The purified product was eluted at 73 : 27 hexanes : ethyl acetate. The purified product and hexane wash were further analyzed via GPC.


### 2.9. Polymerization of4 and10 (7)

In a 100.0 mL Schlenk flask equipped with a stir bar,10 (0.0109 g, 0.0279 mmol),4 (0.00430 g, 0.0279 mmol), PdCl2(PPh3)2 (0.00100 g, 0.00140 mmol), and CuI (0.00030 g, 0.00140 mmol) were added. This flask was connected to a condenser and then purged and filled with argon. Through the sidearm of the flask, 5.00 mL of distilled triethylamine and 14.0 mL of distilled THF were added via a purged and filled syringe. The flask was lowered into an 80°C oil bath and stirred for 20 hours. Following completion, the solvent was removed via rotary evaporation to produce a dark brown solid, polymer7. The solid was washed with 10 mL of ethyl acetate and sonication for 5 minutes and then filtered and washed with additional ethyl acetate. The resulting product was further analyzed via GPC.


### 2.10. Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)

A GPC System consisting of a 1525 Binary Pump, 717 Autosampler, 2414 Refractive Index (RI) detector, and a 2996 Photodiode Array (PDA) detector (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) was utilized in examining the polymer samples as indicated above. Due to backpressure limitations the RI detector was in series after the PDA detector. The mobile phase consisted of an isocratic mobile phase of tetrahydrofuran (THF) at a flow of 1 mL/min with the analysis done on a Styragel HR 1 column (7.8 × 300 mm, also from Waters Corporation) maintained at a temperature of 50°C in a column oven. Control of the equipment was done using the Empower 3 software with the GPC option for calibration and data handling (also from Waters Corporation). A calibration curve was generated using individual polystyrene standards (50μL injected) and RI detection. Polymer samples were also dissolved in THF and analyzed using RI detection and molecular weight determination based upon the molecular weight calibration curve. PDA detection was used to confirm the compounds of interest by their UV-Visible characteristics and matched to the RI signal for molecular weight determination.


## 2.1. Materials and Instrumentation

C60 and C70 standards were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All solvents used were of HPLC grade or higher. Individual polystyrene standards used for gel permeation chromatography (GPC) were from Waters Corporation (Milford, MA, USA) and were at a molecular weight of 456, 1050, 5970, and 2630 g/mol. These standards were prepared at a concentration of 0.2% (by weight) in tetrahydrofuran (THF) individually.Chemicals were purchased from Aldrich, Alfa Aesar, GFS, and Spectra Group Limited and used as received unless otherwise indicated. Compounds1,4, and10 were prepared as previously reported [4, 6, 39]. Molecular characterization is based on spectra data (1H NMR, IR) and physical data reported in previous documented procedures for the smaller subunits. Spectroscopic instrumentation utilized is identical to that reported previously [6].


## 2.2. Synthesis of Central Hub Precursor (8)

In a 100.0 mL Schlenk flask equipped with a stir bar, 1,3-dibromo-5-iodobenzene (0.5000 g, 1.382 mmol), PdCl2(PPh3)2 (0.0479 g, 0.0682 mmol), and CuI (0.4057 g, 2.130 mmol) were added. This flask was connected to a condenser and then purged and filled with argon. Through the sidearm of the condenser, 7.0 mL of distilled triethylamine was added via a purged and filled airtight syringe. 10.0 mL of distilled toluene was added in the same manner. Approximately 10.0 mL of trimethylsilylacetylene (TMS acetylene) was bubbled with argon for about 10 min to remove oxygen; then a portion (0.2164 mL, 1.520 mmol) was added via airtight syringe to the reaction mixture. The reaction flask was lowered into an oil bath and heated to 80°C. The reaction refluxed for 20 hours. After reflux, the solvent was removed from the black grainy solution via rotary evaporation. The remaining solid was extracted with 10 mL of ethyl acetate and sonication for 10 minutes. The mixture was then filtered and washed with ethyl acetate. A brownish/gray solid was filtered out and the brown filtrate was rotovapped to produce product8 in quantitative yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.25 (s, 9H), 7.51 (dd, Ph, 2H), 7.58 (s, Ph, 1H).


## 2.3. Deprotection of8 (9)

In a 250 mL round bottom flask equipped with a stir bar,8 (0.2380 g, 0.7166 mmol), 20.0 mL distilled and degassed THF, 6.0 mL of 20% (w/v) NaOH solution, and 37.0 mL of methanol were added. The solution was stirred vigorously for 2 hours at room temperature, producing an orange solution. Once the stirring was complete, 50 mL of water was added to the flask producing a white cloudy precipitate. Following the addition of 40 mL of chloroform, the mixture was filtered to remove the white precipitate. The filtrate was then placed in a separatory funnel and the organic layer collected. Following drying with sodium sulfate, the solution was rotovapped to produce yellowish/orange solid9 in quantitative yield. IR (ATR, cm−1) 1744.38, 1764.81, 2847.67, 2921.23, 3060.161, 3284.90. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.16 (s, acetylene, H), 7.54 (bs, Ph, 2H), 7.64 (s, Ph, H).


## 2.4. Attachment of Substituted Fullerene1 to9 (2)

In a 100 mL Schlenk flask9 (0.0145 g, 0.0558 mmol),1 [4, 6] (0.0423 g, 0.0468 mmol), PdCl2(PPh3)2 (0.008 g, 0.0114 mmol), and CuI (0.065 g, 0.3413 mmol) were added along with a stir bar. A condenser was added, and the apparatus was purged and filled with argon. Through the top of the condenser, 7.0 mL of distilled trimethylamine and 10.0 mL of distilled toluene were added via a purged and filled airtight syringe. The apparatus was lowered into an 80°C oil bath and heated for 24 hours. The solvent was removed from the reaction mixture via rotary evaporation, and the dark reddish brown oily solid was extracted with 10 mL of ethyl acetate and 10 minutes of sonication. The remaining solid was removed via filtration, and the filtrate was rotovapped to produce crude product2 as a brownish oil. The product was purified via medium pressure liquid chromatography (MPLC) on silica. The product eluted at 70 : 30 hexanes : ethyl acetate, yield 46%. IR (ATR, cm−1) 788.20, 1008.85, 1258.12, 2966.17. 1H NMR (500 MHz, C6D6) δ 5.28 (s, CH2, 2H), 5.30 (s, CH2, 2H), 7.03 (d, Ph, 1H), 7.05 (dd, Ph, 1H), 7.67 (bs, Ph, 1H), 7.69 (dd, Ph, 2H), 7.70 (s, Ph, 1H).


## 2.5. Synthesis of 1,4-Dimethoxy-2,5-[bis-trimethylsilylacetyl]benzene (11)

In a 100.0 mL Schlenk flask equipped with a stir bar,10 (0.2500 g, 0.641 mmol), PdCl2(PPh3)2 (0.0442 g, 0.0632 mmol), and CuI (0.3762 g, 1.976 mmol) were added. A condenser was added, and the apparatus was purged and filled with argon. Through the sidearm of the flask, 5.0 mL of distilled triethylamine and 10.0 mL of distilled toluene were added via a purged and filled airtight syringe. Lastly, 15 mL of TMS acetylene was placed in a small round bottom flask and was degassed with argon for about 10 min before it was added through the sidearm of the Schlenk flask (0.1916 mL, 1.346 mmol) with a purged and filled airtight syringe. The apparatus was lowered into an 80°C oil bath and heated for 24 hours. The solvent was removed from the light orange reaction mixture via rotary evaporation, and the solid was extracted with 10 mL of ethyl acetate and 10 minutes of sonication. The remaining solid was removed via filtration, and the filtrate was rotovapped to produce crude product11 as a grayish/gold solid. The product was purified via MPLC on silica. The product eluted at 70 : 30 hexanes : ethyl acetate in quantitative yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.21 (s, CH3, 18H), 3.76 (s, OCH3, 6H), 6.86 (s, Ph, 2H).


## 2.6. Deprotection of11 (3)

In a 250 mL round bottom flask equipped with a stir bar,11 (0.0694 g, 0.2099 mmol), 11.6 mL distilled THF, 3.6 mL of 20% (w/v) NaOH solution, and 21.7 mL of methanol were added. The solution was stirred vigorously for 2 hours at room temperature, producing a clear solution. Once the stirring was complete, 50 mL of water and 40 mL of chloroform were added to the flask producing a white precipitate. The precipitate was removed via filtration, and the filtrate was placed in a separatory funnel. The organic layer was collected and dried with sodium sulfate. Removal of the solvent produced crude product3 as a light brownish/yellow solid. The crude product was purified via MPLC on silica. The product eluted at 92 : 8 hexanes : ethyl acetate, 34% yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.39 (s, acetylene, 2H), 3.80 (s, OCH3, 6H), 6.96 (s, Ph, 2H).


## 2.7. Polymerization of2 and3 (5)

In a 100.0 mL Schlenk flask equipped with a stir bar,2 (0.0583 g, 0.0538 mmol),3 (0.0100 g, 0.0538 mmol), PdCl2(PPh3)2 (0.00189 g, 0.00267 mmol), and CuI (0.000500 g, 0.00267 mmol) were added. This flask was connected to a condenser and then purged and filled with argon. Through the sidearm of the flask, 5.00 mL of distilled triethylamine and 14.0 mL of distilled THF were added via a purged and filled syringe. The flask was lowered into a 70°C oil bath and stirred for 24 hours. Following completion, the solvent was removed via rotary evaporation to produce a brownish/orange oily solid, polymer5. This solid was sequentially extracted with hot acetone and hexanes, and solids were rotovapped from each wash. The remaining solid (25 mg), acetone extraction (15.9 mg), and hexanes extraction (18.9 mg) were analyzed via GPC. The product was found in the acetone wash. 1H NMR (500 MHz, C6D6) δ 3.70 (s, Acetylene, 2H), 3.80 (s, OCH3, 6H), 6.96 (s, Ph, 2H), 3.89 (s, CH2, 2H), 3.91 (s, CH2, 2H).


## 2.8. Polymerization of2 and4 (6)

In a 100.0 mL Schlenk flask equipped with a stir bar,2 (0.0950 g, 0.0876 mmol),4 (0.0135 g, 0.0876 mmol), PdCl2(PPh3)2 (0.00307 g, 0.00438 mmol), and CuI (0.000834 g, 0.00438 mmol) were added. This flask was connected to a condenser and then purged and filled with argon. Through the sidearm of the flask, 5.00 mL of distilled triethylamine and 14.0 mL of distilled THF were added via a purged and filled airtight syringe. The flask was lowered into a 70°C oil bath and stirred for 21 hours. Following completion, the solvent was removed via rotary evaporation to produce a brownish/orange oily solid, polymer6. The solid was sequentially extracted with hot acetone and hexanes, and solids were rotovapped from each wash. The remaining solid following extractions was purified further via MPLC on silica. The purified product was eluted at 73 : 27 hexanes : ethyl acetate. The purified product and hexane wash were further analyzed via GPC.


## 2.9. Polymerization of4 and10 (7)

In a 100.0 mL Schlenk flask equipped with a stir bar,10 (0.0109 g, 0.0279 mmol),4 (0.00430 g, 0.0279 mmol), PdCl2(PPh3)2 (0.00100 g, 0.00140 mmol), and CuI (0.00030 g, 0.00140 mmol) were added. This flask was connected to a condenser and then purged and filled with argon. Through the sidearm of the flask, 5.00 mL of distilled triethylamine and 14.0 mL of distilled THF were added via a purged and filled syringe. The flask was lowered into an 80°C oil bath and stirred for 20 hours. Following completion, the solvent was removed via rotary evaporation to produce a dark brown solid, polymer7. The solid was washed with 10 mL of ethyl acetate and sonication for 5 minutes and then filtered and washed with additional ethyl acetate. The resulting product was further analyzed via GPC.


## 2.10. Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)

A GPC System consisting of a 1525 Binary Pump, 717 Autosampler, 2414 Refractive Index (RI) detector, and a 2996 Photodiode Array (PDA) detector (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) was utilized in examining the polymer samples as indicated above. Due to backpressure limitations the RI detector was in series after the PDA detector. The mobile phase consisted of an isocratic mobile phase of tetrahydrofuran (THF) at a flow of 1 mL/min with the analysis done on a Styragel HR 1 column (7.8 × 300 mm, also from Waters Corporation) maintained at a temperature of 50°C in a column oven. Control of the equipment was done using the Empower 3 software with the GPC option for calibration and data handling (also from Waters Corporation). A calibration curve was generated using individual polystyrene standards (50μL injected) and RI detection. Polymer samples were also dissolved in THF and analyzed using RI detection and molecular weight determination based upon the molecular weight calibration curve. PDA detection was used to confirm the compounds of interest by their UV-Visible characteristics and matched to the RI signal for molecular weight determination.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Synthesis of Repeat Units and Polymers

The design of our polymeric repeat units builds on the experience our group and others [19–27] have had with Stille and Sonogashira coupling. Preferential substitution at the iodine provides precursor8 in surprisingly high yield with minimal purification needed. Indeed, the most challenging step is the final attachment of substituted fullerene1, due both to the poor solubility of the modified fullerene in the necessary solvents for these coupling reactions and to a significant side product where the substituted aromatic preferentially reacts with itself. Once the repeat units were available, the polymerization was relatively straightforward and provided well-defined PPE-type polymers based on their limited reaction sites. Not surprisingly, the polymeric products precipitated out of solution during the reaction period, again due to the poor fullerene solubility. This solubility issue is a likely cause for the lower than desired molecular weights for these products (vide infra). The obtained polymers exhibited different physical properties and greatly broadened NMR features compared to their monomeric precursors. Initial spectroscopic examination did demonstrate that unreacted monomers were present in the crude products. Through experimentation with different washes and extractions, it was determined that the desired polymer products containing fullerenes (5 and6) were preferentially removed with a hot acetone extraction over more polar solvents that generally removed unreacted monomers. Polymer7 is very similar in structure to a previously reported polymer [40], but with shorter side chains on the dialkoxy benzene unit. Its physical and spectroscopic characteristics are very similar to this previously reported system.


### 3.2. GPC Characterization

The use of GPC to determine molecular weights of fullerene-containing compounds has been performed previously using polystyrene standards and RI detection [26, 27, 41–45]. In our case, the addition of PDA detection allowed for peak identification of the compounds of interest based upon their UV-Visible absorption spectra (since the chromophore absorption spectrum stays relatively consistent before and after polymerization,vide infra) and the corresponding RI peak used for molecular weight determination. The GPC results showed relatively monodisperse samples, but the obtained molecular weights were much lower than expected (Table 1) when compared to the polystyrene standards. This disparity stems from fullerene’s size in relation to the packing material pore size. Instead of the normal interaction expected between the analyte molecules and packing material, the large diameter of the fullerene prevents this interaction, thus altering the expected retention time of the analyte. Hence, the polymer portions associated with the PPE backbone may interact with the media, but the fullerene portion is effectively ignored. While several researchers have successfully utilized GPC for fullerene-containing polymers without issue [27, 43, 44], many of these systems have significantly more limited fullerene loading than our structures. However, other groups [26, 45] have reported large disparities between their GPC results and independent molecular weight determinations for the same reason described above. Although more sophisticated corrections were applied in these studies, we can apply a simple ratio assuming that the PPE mass is the sole portion of the polymer represented by the GPC data (i.e., apply a ratio of the PPE backbone’s portion of the utilized repeat unit to the obtained molecular weight values). Following correction, the molecular weight increases significantly (Table 1) and represents between 30 and 40 repeat units for each polymer sample. For polymer7, the obtained molecular weight did not need correction (since fullerene is not present) and was similar to previously reported PPE polymers with similar structure [40] and in the range of our other samples. Polymer7 had a higher number of repeat units obtained than5 and6, which is not surprising considering the solubility issues of the substituted fullerene (vide supra) that restricted the polymerization reaction times before product precipitation.Table 1
GPC data on polymers5–7.
Polymer
M
w/kD
M
w (corrected)/kD
Repeat units
5
12.81
41.66
32.7
6
12.44
42.96
34.7
7
14.29
N/A
47.5


### 3.3. UV-Vis Absorption Spectroscopy

Absorption spectra of precursor2 and polymers5–7 in 2-MTHF at optically dilute concentrations are shown in Figure 1. For the fullerene-containing precursor, the spectrum is very similar to previously reported substituted fullerene1 [4, 6] with intense absorption bands below 350 nm typically associated with aromatic π,π∗ transitions [1, 46–50]. We do not observe the longer wavelength features typically associated with fullerenes, likely due to the intense absorption associated with the aromatic “hub” structure. Upon polymerization, fullerene-containing polymers5 and6 retain the major absorption around 300 nm but exhibit some of the characteristic changes in absorption spectra typically seen in polymers as excited states shift to lower, potentially more complicated energy manifolds (e.g., red-shifting of bands, band broadening, and tailing to longer wavelengths). These changes are particularly apparent in polymer5 that contains the fullerene and benzene moieties. The effect is less pronounced in polymer6 that contains fullerene and bipyridine moieties due to the potential of the bipyridine to twist (vide infra), but the spectra are consistent with our small molecule studies [6] that indicated the large absorption cross section of the fullerene dominates the excitation profile of the system. Only the higher energy aromatic absorption is retained in polymer7, which is similar to previously reported systems [51]. Since7 does not contain the fullerene moiety, we can assign the redder features to this portion of the polymers and any possible charge transfer states between the polymer backbone and pendant fullerenes. The absorption tails to lower energies present in these dilute solutions suggest some aggregation of the polymer strands (vide infra) [52].Figure 1
Normalized absorption spectra (at 300 nm) recorded on degassed 2-MTHF solutions of polymer subunit2 and polymers5–7.


### 3.4. Emission Spectroscopy

Emission spectra for precursor2 and polymers5–7 in degassed 2-MTHF at 298 and 80 K are shown in Figure 2. Molecules were excited at 320 nm, which focused on the higher energy bands observed in the absorption spectrum (vide supra). Emission at 298 K is generally dominated by the presence of a strong, relatively broad peak between 370 and 400 nm depending on the sample. For precursor2, this peak can be assigned to π1,π∗ fluorescence due to interaction between the fullerene and aromatic “hub” (vide infra) and is similar to our previously reported substituted fullerene systems. We do not see any long wavelength emission at room temperature commonly observed for unsubstituted fullerene. Emission spectra are generally expected to broaden when comparing monomers to their ensuing polymers, but this broadening is minimal with these systems (e.g., cf.2 and5–7). This result can be explained by the already broad emission of the substituted fullerene in2 coupled with the observed presence of intermolecular aggregation (vide infra). The polymer spectra appear to exhibit two overlapping peaks: around 360 nm that corresponds to the PPE backbone (both bipyridine and dialkoxy repeat units) and around 400 nm that corresponds to the substituted fullerene moiety. This assignment aligns well with the data obtained for7, since only the single higher energy peak is observed in this polymer. Interestingly, the difference in PPE backbone between5 and6 manifested in their emission spectra is more pronounced than expected. The narrow, blue-shifted emission for6 is likely due to the locked orthogonal twist between rings in the bipyridine moiety in the solvent glass, significantly reducing the effective conjugation of the system and raising the excited-state energy. While this twist has been observed in other PPE polymers [52], it is more pronounced here due to the large bulk of the pendent fullerenes that further reduce the likelihood of bipyridine planarity.Figure 2
Normalized emission spectra recorded on degassed 2-MTHF solutions at 298 K (solid) and 80 K (dashed), excitation wavelength 320 nm. Emission intensity decreases (except2) with reduced temperature.Upon cooling, the observed fluorescence decreases in intensity (except for2, which increases) and exhibits some red-shifting. The additional peak structure seen for subunit2 is similar to substituted fullerene1 as previously reported, which is typical of fullerene emission from a π,π∗ excited state [46, 47]. However, the fullerene-like emission characteristics are largely absent from polymers5 and6 at 80 K. Instead, the polymers respond much like other PPE-type polymers, suggesting that the backbone provides the predominant deactivation pathway for the excited-state manifold (vide infra).While the intensity decrease upon reduced temperature may be due to the presence of accessible dark deactivation pathways, the more likely explanation is intermolecular deactivation due to aggregation of the polymeric strands [52]. We were able to detect significant depolarization of the emission signal at reduced temperatures for all polymer samples through the sharp decrease of anisotropy value r(λ). This depolarization largely results from exciton migration between individual polymer strands upon photoexcitation. Such aggregation is even apparent at room temperature in optically dilute solutions for fullerene-containing polymers5 and6 (vide supra), with slight emission depolarization even at 298 K that becomes significantly pronounced at temperatures below 200 K. Such depolarization has been observed for other PPE oligomeric and polymeric systems [52, 53], but these systems more easily associate due to the large size of the fullerenes and the absence of long alkyl side chains normally found in PPE systems to enhance solubility and discourage aggregation.Emission lifetimes were recorded at 298 K and 80 K for precursor2 and polymers5–7 and are listed in Table 2. Emission lifetimes were similar at various wavelengths sampled across the observed emission manifold, and decays were fit by a single exponential model. It should be noted that the measured lifetime for7 is approaching the FWHM of our excitation laser (10 ns), suggesting that the lifetime is likely shorter than recorded (similar PPE-type polymer samples typically have fluorescence lifetimes around 1 ns) [40, 54–56]. The fullerene-containing samples have distinctly longer lifetimes than7 but are still relatively short. Previously, we observed 425 nm emission lifetimes for1 and1-bipyridine dyads around 150 ns that slightly decreased to ca. 100 ns upon cooling [6]. Instead, a significantly shorter lifetime is observed for these samples at room temperature. The decrease in lifetimes is not entirely surprising, as the presumed aggregation of the polymer strands (vide supra) could provide additional excited-state deactivation pathways not present in the small molecule analogs. In addition, the lack of fullerene spectral signatures in the emission (vide supra) normally seen in the small molecule analogs provides further evidence of a perturbed excited-state manifold as a result of the polymerization.Table 2
Emission lifetime data on repeat unit2and polymers 5–7a.
Compound
τ (298 K)/ns
τ (80 K)/ns
2
24.1
25.9
5
21.6
18.3
6
27.8
24.7
7
11.5
b
16.4
b
aData recorded on degassed 2-MTHF solutions, 355 nm excitation, 425 nm emission. bLimited by the pulse width of excitation laser (10 ns), likely shorter.


### 3.5. Excited-State Behavior

To better understand the structure of the excited-state manifold of these systems, we have constructed the Jablonski diagram shown in Scheme5. We have reported a similar structure for our fullerene-bipyridine small molecule systems [6], with one key difference as noted in Scheme 5. Polymer7 (without fullerene present) provides the typical excited-state behavior normally seen for PPE-based polymers, with a pronounced fluorescence from a π1,π∗ excited state. Previous work also indicates that a nonemissive π3,π∗ state provides an alternative decay pathway. The fluorescence lifetimes are short (likely shorter than reported;vide supra), corresponding to that expected in these systems.Scheme 5
Jablonski diagram of monomer2 and polymers5–7.The excited-state behavior exhibited by monomer2 is similar to monomer1 as reported before. In2 a similar fluorescence is seen that is dominated by a π1,π∗ excited state at lower energy than that seen for polymer7. Any evidence of a lower-energy fullerene-based π3,π∗ excited state (1.50 eV) [57] is only observed at lower temperatures as a red-shifted emission, suggesting the singlet state is strongly coupled to the ground state. This singlet energy level does not correspond well to either the unsubstituted fullerene (much lower) or aromatic “handle” (somewhat higher) portions, suggesting significant interaction between these two moieties to produce a delocalized state. Indeed, computational studies [10] on our small molecule analogs of these systems clearly illustrate the extended delocalization within the substituted fullerene system. This delocalization also produces the modestly increased (but still relatively short) lifetimes. Recent studies utilizing Stark absorption spectroscopy on these systems provide additional support that the accessed π1,π∗ state associated with the substituted fullerene is centered on the organic “hub” portion of the moiety. Key to this analysis is the treatment of the substituted fullerene/benzene hub moiety as a single unit that is dominated by a higher energy π1,π∗ transition, rather than the fullerene exhibiting excited-state behavior separate from the attached organic framework. It is possible that these systems exhibit excited-state behavior centered on the fullerene (ca. short emission lifetimes), but such rapid emission decay would not be observable with our current instrumentation due to our excitation laser’s FWHM (vide supra). Interestingly, the π1,π∗ state for2 is lower than1, presumably due to the extended organic framework following substitution to the trisubstituted benzene ring.Turning to fullerene-containing polymers5 and6, the relative isolation of the substituted fullerene moiety from the polymer backbone leads to independent behavior of these two subunits as demonstrated by the clear presence of two overlapping emission peaks in the 298 K data of5 and6. These peaks align well with those independently observed for the fullerene/hub and polymer backbone in2 and7, respectively. Because the substituted fullerene moiety is lower in energy than the polymer backbone, we expect the majority of the excited-state decay moves through this state since the emission lifetimes remain relatively constant among2,5, and6. The contribution of the polymer backbone excited state is overemphasized in the emission spectrum due to the high fluorescence quantum yield of organic PPE-based polymers.Upon cooling, only the polymer backbone fluorescence remains (e.g., cf. the 80 K emissions of2 and5), suggesting the substituted fullerene moiety is deactivated through a different nonemissive state (the phosphorescence seen for2 at low temperatures is not observed). Based on the decreased emission anisotropy values observed at low temperature (vide supra), we believe this state instead exhibits interchain energy transfer, leaving the polymer backbone-based state to radiatively decay. Unlike other studies that show a loss of emission upon aggregation [52], the large size of the fullerenes and their relative isolation from the polymer backbone electronics allow them to effectively buffer the polymer from any interchain deactivation effects. A recent report by Li and Benicewicz [28] suggests that polymers with pendant fullerenes aggregate readily, so our anisotropy results are not surprising. However, we are not aware of such a derivatized polymer insulating the core system from interchain energy transfer deactivation. The emission lifetime slightly decreases for polymers5 and6 at reduced temperatures, which also supports the conclusion that the polymer backbone excited state becomes the primary mode of decay. It does not completely decrease to that observed for7, presumably due to lingering aggregation effects or measurement uncertainty due to the short lifetimes for our instrumentation (vide supra).


## 3.1. Synthesis of Repeat Units and Polymers

The design of our polymeric repeat units builds on the experience our group and others [19–27] have had with Stille and Sonogashira coupling. Preferential substitution at the iodine provides precursor8 in surprisingly high yield with minimal purification needed. Indeed, the most challenging step is the final attachment of substituted fullerene1, due both to the poor solubility of the modified fullerene in the necessary solvents for these coupling reactions and to a significant side product where the substituted aromatic preferentially reacts with itself. Once the repeat units were available, the polymerization was relatively straightforward and provided well-defined PPE-type polymers based on their limited reaction sites. Not surprisingly, the polymeric products precipitated out of solution during the reaction period, again due to the poor fullerene solubility. This solubility issue is a likely cause for the lower than desired molecular weights for these products (vide infra). The obtained polymers exhibited different physical properties and greatly broadened NMR features compared to their monomeric precursors. Initial spectroscopic examination did demonstrate that unreacted monomers were present in the crude products. Through experimentation with different washes and extractions, it was determined that the desired polymer products containing fullerenes (5 and6) were preferentially removed with a hot acetone extraction over more polar solvents that generally removed unreacted monomers. Polymer7 is very similar in structure to a previously reported polymer [40], but with shorter side chains on the dialkoxy benzene unit. Its physical and spectroscopic characteristics are very similar to this previously reported system.


## 3.2. GPC Characterization

The use of GPC to determine molecular weights of fullerene-containing compounds has been performed previously using polystyrene standards and RI detection [26, 27, 41–45]. In our case, the addition of PDA detection allowed for peak identification of the compounds of interest based upon their UV-Visible absorption spectra (since the chromophore absorption spectrum stays relatively consistent before and after polymerization,vide infra) and the corresponding RI peak used for molecular weight determination. The GPC results showed relatively monodisperse samples, but the obtained molecular weights were much lower than expected (Table 1) when compared to the polystyrene standards. This disparity stems from fullerene’s size in relation to the packing material pore size. Instead of the normal interaction expected between the analyte molecules and packing material, the large diameter of the fullerene prevents this interaction, thus altering the expected retention time of the analyte. Hence, the polymer portions associated with the PPE backbone may interact with the media, but the fullerene portion is effectively ignored. While several researchers have successfully utilized GPC for fullerene-containing polymers without issue [27, 43, 44], many of these systems have significantly more limited fullerene loading than our structures. However, other groups [26, 45] have reported large disparities between their GPC results and independent molecular weight determinations for the same reason described above. Although more sophisticated corrections were applied in these studies, we can apply a simple ratio assuming that the PPE mass is the sole portion of the polymer represented by the GPC data (i.e., apply a ratio of the PPE backbone’s portion of the utilized repeat unit to the obtained molecular weight values). Following correction, the molecular weight increases significantly (Table 1) and represents between 30 and 40 repeat units for each polymer sample. For polymer7, the obtained molecular weight did not need correction (since fullerene is not present) and was similar to previously reported PPE polymers with similar structure [40] and in the range of our other samples. Polymer7 had a higher number of repeat units obtained than5 and6, which is not surprising considering the solubility issues of the substituted fullerene (vide supra) that restricted the polymerization reaction times before product precipitation.Table 1
GPC data on polymers5–7.
Polymer
M
w/kD
M
w (corrected)/kD
Repeat units
5
12.81
41.66
32.7
6
12.44
42.96
34.7
7
14.29
N/A
47.5


## 3.3. UV-Vis Absorption Spectroscopy

Absorption spectra of precursor2 and polymers5–7 in 2-MTHF at optically dilute concentrations are shown in Figure 1. For the fullerene-containing precursor, the spectrum is very similar to previously reported substituted fullerene1 [4, 6] with intense absorption bands below 350 nm typically associated with aromatic π,π∗ transitions [1, 46–50]. We do not observe the longer wavelength features typically associated with fullerenes, likely due to the intense absorption associated with the aromatic “hub” structure. Upon polymerization, fullerene-containing polymers5 and6 retain the major absorption around 300 nm but exhibit some of the characteristic changes in absorption spectra typically seen in polymers as excited states shift to lower, potentially more complicated energy manifolds (e.g., red-shifting of bands, band broadening, and tailing to longer wavelengths). These changes are particularly apparent in polymer5 that contains the fullerene and benzene moieties. The effect is less pronounced in polymer6 that contains fullerene and bipyridine moieties due to the potential of the bipyridine to twist (vide infra), but the spectra are consistent with our small molecule studies [6] that indicated the large absorption cross section of the fullerene dominates the excitation profile of the system. Only the higher energy aromatic absorption is retained in polymer7, which is similar to previously reported systems [51]. Since7 does not contain the fullerene moiety, we can assign the redder features to this portion of the polymers and any possible charge transfer states between the polymer backbone and pendant fullerenes. The absorption tails to lower energies present in these dilute solutions suggest some aggregation of the polymer strands (vide infra) [52].Figure 1
Normalized absorption spectra (at 300 nm) recorded on degassed 2-MTHF solutions of polymer subunit2 and polymers5–7.


## 3.4. Emission Spectroscopy

Emission spectra for precursor2 and polymers5–7 in degassed 2-MTHF at 298 and 80 K are shown in Figure 2. Molecules were excited at 320 nm, which focused on the higher energy bands observed in the absorption spectrum (vide supra). Emission at 298 K is generally dominated by the presence of a strong, relatively broad peak between 370 and 400 nm depending on the sample. For precursor2, this peak can be assigned to π1,π∗ fluorescence due to interaction between the fullerene and aromatic “hub” (vide infra) and is similar to our previously reported substituted fullerene systems. We do not see any long wavelength emission at room temperature commonly observed for unsubstituted fullerene. Emission spectra are generally expected to broaden when comparing monomers to their ensuing polymers, but this broadening is minimal with these systems (e.g., cf.2 and5–7). This result can be explained by the already broad emission of the substituted fullerene in2 coupled with the observed presence of intermolecular aggregation (vide infra). The polymer spectra appear to exhibit two overlapping peaks: around 360 nm that corresponds to the PPE backbone (both bipyridine and dialkoxy repeat units) and around 400 nm that corresponds to the substituted fullerene moiety. This assignment aligns well with the data obtained for7, since only the single higher energy peak is observed in this polymer. Interestingly, the difference in PPE backbone between5 and6 manifested in their emission spectra is more pronounced than expected. The narrow, blue-shifted emission for6 is likely due to the locked orthogonal twist between rings in the bipyridine moiety in the solvent glass, significantly reducing the effective conjugation of the system and raising the excited-state energy. While this twist has been observed in other PPE polymers [52], it is more pronounced here due to the large bulk of the pendent fullerenes that further reduce the likelihood of bipyridine planarity.Figure 2
Normalized emission spectra recorded on degassed 2-MTHF solutions at 298 K (solid) and 80 K (dashed), excitation wavelength 320 nm. Emission intensity decreases (except2) with reduced temperature.Upon cooling, the observed fluorescence decreases in intensity (except for2, which increases) and exhibits some red-shifting. The additional peak structure seen for subunit2 is similar to substituted fullerene1 as previously reported, which is typical of fullerene emission from a π,π∗ excited state [46, 47]. However, the fullerene-like emission characteristics are largely absent from polymers5 and6 at 80 K. Instead, the polymers respond much like other PPE-type polymers, suggesting that the backbone provides the predominant deactivation pathway for the excited-state manifold (vide infra).While the intensity decrease upon reduced temperature may be due to the presence of accessible dark deactivation pathways, the more likely explanation is intermolecular deactivation due to aggregation of the polymeric strands [52]. We were able to detect significant depolarization of the emission signal at reduced temperatures for all polymer samples through the sharp decrease of anisotropy value r(λ). This depolarization largely results from exciton migration between individual polymer strands upon photoexcitation. Such aggregation is even apparent at room temperature in optically dilute solutions for fullerene-containing polymers5 and6 (vide supra), with slight emission depolarization even at 298 K that becomes significantly pronounced at temperatures below 200 K. Such depolarization has been observed for other PPE oligomeric and polymeric systems [52, 53], but these systems more easily associate due to the large size of the fullerenes and the absence of long alkyl side chains normally found in PPE systems to enhance solubility and discourage aggregation.Emission lifetimes were recorded at 298 K and 80 K for precursor2 and polymers5–7 and are listed in Table 2. Emission lifetimes were similar at various wavelengths sampled across the observed emission manifold, and decays were fit by a single exponential model. It should be noted that the measured lifetime for7 is approaching the FWHM of our excitation laser (10 ns), suggesting that the lifetime is likely shorter than recorded (similar PPE-type polymer samples typically have fluorescence lifetimes around 1 ns) [40, 54–56]. The fullerene-containing samples have distinctly longer lifetimes than7 but are still relatively short. Previously, we observed 425 nm emission lifetimes for1 and1-bipyridine dyads around 150 ns that slightly decreased to ca. 100 ns upon cooling [6]. Instead, a significantly shorter lifetime is observed for these samples at room temperature. The decrease in lifetimes is not entirely surprising, as the presumed aggregation of the polymer strands (vide supra) could provide additional excited-state deactivation pathways not present in the small molecule analogs. In addition, the lack of fullerene spectral signatures in the emission (vide supra) normally seen in the small molecule analogs provides further evidence of a perturbed excited-state manifold as a result of the polymerization.Table 2
Emission lifetime data on repeat unit2and polymers 5–7a.
Compound
τ (298 K)/ns
τ (80 K)/ns
2
24.1
25.9
5
21.6
18.3
6
27.8
24.7
7
11.5
b
16.4
b
aData recorded on degassed 2-MTHF solutions, 355 nm excitation, 425 nm emission. bLimited by the pulse width of excitation laser (10 ns), likely shorter.


## 3.5. Excited-State Behavior

To better understand the structure of the excited-state manifold of these systems, we have constructed the Jablonski diagram shown in Scheme5. We have reported a similar structure for our fullerene-bipyridine small molecule systems [6], with one key difference as noted in Scheme 5. Polymer7 (without fullerene present) provides the typical excited-state behavior normally seen for PPE-based polymers, with a pronounced fluorescence from a π1,π∗ excited state. Previous work also indicates that a nonemissive π3,π∗ state provides an alternative decay pathway. The fluorescence lifetimes are short (likely shorter than reported;vide supra), corresponding to that expected in these systems.Scheme 5
Jablonski diagram of monomer2 and polymers5–7.The excited-state behavior exhibited by monomer2 is similar to monomer1 as reported before. In2 a similar fluorescence is seen that is dominated by a π1,π∗ excited state at lower energy than that seen for polymer7. Any evidence of a lower-energy fullerene-based π3,π∗ excited state (1.50 eV) [57] is only observed at lower temperatures as a red-shifted emission, suggesting the singlet state is strongly coupled to the ground state. This singlet energy level does not correspond well to either the unsubstituted fullerene (much lower) or aromatic “handle” (somewhat higher) portions, suggesting significant interaction between these two moieties to produce a delocalized state. Indeed, computational studies [10] on our small molecule analogs of these systems clearly illustrate the extended delocalization within the substituted fullerene system. This delocalization also produces the modestly increased (but still relatively short) lifetimes. Recent studies utilizing Stark absorption spectroscopy on these systems provide additional support that the accessed π1,π∗ state associated with the substituted fullerene is centered on the organic “hub” portion of the moiety. Key to this analysis is the treatment of the substituted fullerene/benzene hub moiety as a single unit that is dominated by a higher energy π1,π∗ transition, rather than the fullerene exhibiting excited-state behavior separate from the attached organic framework. It is possible that these systems exhibit excited-state behavior centered on the fullerene (ca. short emission lifetimes), but such rapid emission decay would not be observable with our current instrumentation due to our excitation laser’s FWHM (vide supra). Interestingly, the π1,π∗ state for2 is lower than1, presumably due to the extended organic framework following substitution to the trisubstituted benzene ring.Turning to fullerene-containing polymers5 and6, the relative isolation of the substituted fullerene moiety from the polymer backbone leads to independent behavior of these two subunits as demonstrated by the clear presence of two overlapping emission peaks in the 298 K data of5 and6. These peaks align well with those independently observed for the fullerene/hub and polymer backbone in2 and7, respectively. Because the substituted fullerene moiety is lower in energy than the polymer backbone, we expect the majority of the excited-state decay moves through this state since the emission lifetimes remain relatively constant among2,5, and6. The contribution of the polymer backbone excited state is overemphasized in the emission spectrum due to the high fluorescence quantum yield of organic PPE-based polymers.Upon cooling, only the polymer backbone fluorescence remains (e.g., cf. the 80 K emissions of2 and5), suggesting the substituted fullerene moiety is deactivated through a different nonemissive state (the phosphorescence seen for2 at low temperatures is not observed). Based on the decreased emission anisotropy values observed at low temperature (vide supra), we believe this state instead exhibits interchain energy transfer, leaving the polymer backbone-based state to radiatively decay. Unlike other studies that show a loss of emission upon aggregation [52], the large size of the fullerenes and their relative isolation from the polymer backbone electronics allow them to effectively buffer the polymer from any interchain deactivation effects. A recent report by Li and Benicewicz [28] suggests that polymers with pendant fullerenes aggregate readily, so our anisotropy results are not surprising. However, we are not aware of such a derivatized polymer insulating the core system from interchain energy transfer deactivation. The emission lifetime slightly decreases for polymers5 and6 at reduced temperatures, which also supports the conclusion that the polymer backbone excited state becomes the primary mode of decay. It does not completely decrease to that observed for7, presumably due to lingering aggregation effects or measurement uncertainty due to the short lifetimes for our instrumentation (vide supra).


## 4. Conclusion

Our group has adapted our methodologies for provided substituted fullerenes in order to integrate them into polymeric repeat units. Polymer molecular weights were confirmed using GPC, taking into account the large size of the fullerenes and their likely incompatibility with the column packing material. Spectroscopic absorption and emission data suggest the presence of excited states associated with both the substituted fullerene and polymer backbone portions and that these excited states are relatively isolated. The polymeric systems also exhibit aggregation even at modest optical densities and at higher temperatures than other PPE-based systems, which is also exhibited in the absence of the substituted fullerene excited state at reduced temperatures (while the isolated backbone fluorescence is still seen). The synthetic strategies reported here can be used to design other oligomeric and polymeric systems containing extended polyaromatic structures (e.g., corannulene and coronene incorporation are currently being explored by our group). Future efforts also involve improving the molecular weight of these polymeric systems through methodology modification (e.g., solvent usage that is more amenable to fullerenes), the ligation of transition metal chromophores to the bipyridine subunits, and further probing of the excited-state behavior with transient absorption spectroscopy and Stark absorption spectroscopy.



---

*Source: 672654-2015-11-05.xml*