# Single-Layer Planar Monopole Antenna-Based Artificial Magnetic Conductor (AMC)

Authors: Ali Abdulateef Abdulbari; Sharul Kamal Abdul Rahim; Firas Abedi; Ping Jack Soh; Ali Hashim; Rami Qays; Sarosh Ahmad; Mohammed Yousif Zeain
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

In this paper, a coplanar waveguide (CPW)-fed patch antenna is fabricated on a layer of metasurface to increase gain. The antenna is fabrication on Roger substrate with a thickness of 0.25 mm, with the overall dimension of the proposed design being 45 × 30 × 0.25 mm3. The size of the patch antenna is 24 × 14 × 0.25 mm3, and the AMC unit cell is 22 × 22 × 0.25 mm3. This metasurface is designed based on the split-ring resonator unit cells forming an array of the artificial magnetic conductor (AMC). Meanwhile, the antenna operation on 3.5 GHz is enabled by etching a split-ring resonator slot on the ground plane with a small gap to enhance antenna gain and improve impedance bandwidth when integrated with a metasurface. This simulation planer monopole antenna is applied for 5G application. The experimenter test is applied for the antenna performance in terms of return loss, gain, and radiation patterns. The operating frequency range with and without MTM is from 3.41 to 3.68 GHz (270 MHz) and 3.37 to 3.55 GHz (180 MHz), respectively, with gain improvements of about 2.7 dB (without MTM) to 6.0 dB (with MTM) at 3.5 GHz. The maximum improvement of the gain is about 42% when integrated with the AMC. The AMC has solved several issues to overcome the typical limitation in conventional antenna design. A circuit model is also proposed to simplify the estimation of the performance of this antenna at the desired frequency band. The proposed design is simulated by CST microwave studio. Finally, the antenna is fabricated and measured. Result comparison between simulations and measurements indicates a good agreement between them.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In recent years, mobile communication systems are challenged by the increasing number of connected devices and higher data rates, low latency, cost, and energy usage. The expected inclusion of Internet of things (IoT) devices totaling more than 20 billion units [1, 2] will require speeds of more than 10 Gbps. The fifth-generation (5G) services have been introduced, with new strategies to optimize the limited spectrum to achieve such data rates [3, 4]. In many countries, the 5G new radio frequency band has been standardized below 6 GHz. 78 GHz frequency is a particular band in the range from 3.3 to 3.8 GHz which has been adapted 3 GHz spectrum congestion cellular networks [6].Planar antennas have received research attention in recent decades due to their attractive benefits—low cost, low profile, ease of integration with other circuits, and suitability for multipolarization antennas [7, 8]. In recent years, these antennas have been investigated to ensure size reduction, enhanced bandwidth, and improved efficiency [9, 10]. Different antennas have been proposed to achieve miniaturization and bandwidth improvements such as circular [11, 12], elliptical [13], triangular [14], fractal [15], E-shaped [16], and U-shaped antennas [17]. While it is ideal to use multiband antennas with wide operating bands, the use of asymmetric parasitic elements will result in radiation pattern variations with frequency. On the other hand, adding slots in the radiating patch is a very effective method to increase the bandwidth without increasing the antenna size. However, this technique is mainly suitable for thicker substrates [18, 19]. Besides that, other techniques such as modification of the ground structure or stacking of multiple substrate layers potentially improve the gain of patch antennas [20]. For the former, several examples include the use of a U-shaped slot, L-shaped arm, or interlocking semielliptical holes in the ground plane, or feeding a rectangular and hexagonal patch using the coplanar waveguide (CPW) technique [21, 22].Metamaterials (MTM) are artificial magnetic materials that do not exist in nature, but their properties can be emulated by special arrangements of existing materials [23]. Meanwhile, using technology MTM in the design of antenna structure may be caused obtain a small size will use this antenna for the large frequency bandwidth [24]. It is increasingly popular to be used to improve the antenna performance by increasing the directivity and gain and reducing the back radiation of patch antennas [25, 26]. One of the types of metamaterials widely used in antennas is the electromagnetic band gap (EBG) and artificial magnetic conductors [27]. To enhance gain, EBG or artificial magnetic conductor (AMC) layers can be integrated with antennas with a small distance between them [28], which maintains the antenna’s overall low profile. The novelty of the proposed antenna is in terms of its compact size with metamaterial, high gain of the antenna, and improved bandwidth. In this work, the design of a planar monopole antenna with AMC is proposed for compact size and high gain enhancement. It operates in the 3.5 GHz band for 5G applications. The contribution of the AMC plane is evaluated by comparing the performance of the antenna with and without the AMC reflector. It is observed that the AMC-backed antenna increased its gain by more than 3 dB at 3.5 GHz. The next section will explain the design of the patch antenna and the AMC unit cell, followed by the presentation of the circuit model, results, and discussion. Finally, Section 5 concludes this paper with a summary of the findings.


## 2. Antenna Design

This section discusses the design methodology of the planar monopole antenna using discrete ground circular rings. In order to verify the scattering parameters of this proposed antenna, the equivalent circuit model is also made for the validity of the 50-ohm input impedance andS11.


### 2.1. Antenna Design Procedure

The structure of the proposed design is printed on Rogers Duroid RT5880LZ substrate with the relative permittivity ofɛr = 2, loss tangent of tanδ = 0.0021, and the standard thickness of 0.25 mm. The overall dimension of the antenna is 45 × 30 × 0.25 mm3. The radiating patch is fed by a single 50 Ω microstrip feed line connected to the antenna. The top view of the proposed antenna and defected ground structure (DGS) are presented in Figure 1. Figure 2 illustrates the step of the parametric study of the proposed antenna. The optimized parameters of the planar monopole antenna with the defected ground structure are listed in Table 1. In the first step, a simple patch is designed. Then, in the next step, slots are added on the right side of the radiating patch and truncated from its edge to resonate at 3.8 GHz. The gain will then be improved when discrete ground circular rings are added to the structure [29]. To calculate the initial antenna and feed line sizes, the procedure outlined in [30] is used as a start.Figure 1
(a) Top view of the proposed patch antenna. (b) Back view of the antenna. (c) Side view of the patch antenna.
(a)(b)(c)Figure 2
Reflection coefficients of the patch antenna in different design steps.Table 1
Dimensions of the patch antenna.
ParameterValue (mm)Wg30Lg45Wp124Wp213.7Lp117Lp214Wf2Ws15Ws26L17L26.36L34L44.5L510Gp0.30Wc1D18D210D314D416


## 2.1. Antenna Design Procedure

The structure of the proposed design is printed on Rogers Duroid RT5880LZ substrate with the relative permittivity ofɛr = 2, loss tangent of tanδ = 0.0021, and the standard thickness of 0.25 mm. The overall dimension of the antenna is 45 × 30 × 0.25 mm3. The radiating patch is fed by a single 50 Ω microstrip feed line connected to the antenna. The top view of the proposed antenna and defected ground structure (DGS) are presented in Figure 1. Figure 2 illustrates the step of the parametric study of the proposed antenna. The optimized parameters of the planar monopole antenna with the defected ground structure are listed in Table 1. In the first step, a simple patch is designed. Then, in the next step, slots are added on the right side of the radiating patch and truncated from its edge to resonate at 3.8 GHz. The gain will then be improved when discrete ground circular rings are added to the structure [29]. To calculate the initial antenna and feed line sizes, the procedure outlined in [30] is used as a start.Figure 1
(a) Top view of the proposed patch antenna. (b) Back view of the antenna. (c) Side view of the patch antenna.
(a)(b)(c)Figure 2
Reflection coefficients of the patch antenna in different design steps.Table 1
Dimensions of the patch antenna.
ParameterValue (mm)Wg30Lg45Wp124Wp213.7Lp117Lp214Wf2Ws15Ws26L17L26.36L34L44.5L510Gp0.30Wc1D18D210D314D416


## 3. Design of the AMC Unit Cell

### 3.1. AMC-Unit Cell

The structure of the proposed AMC-unit cell is presented in Figure3(a). It is designed on Rogers RT5880LZ substrate with the thickness of 0.25 mm, dielectric permittivity of 2, and loss tangent of 0.002, ɛr = 2, loss tangent of tanδ = 0.0021. The dimensions of the ring unit cell radius are R1 = 4.90 mm, R2 = 7.94 mm, R3 = 10.95 mm, R4 = 13.96 mm, whereas the split gap (G) is 1 mm and ring width (W) is 0.5 mm. The overall size of the square-shaped unit cell is 22 × 22 × 0.25 mm3. The comparison of the reflection phase of a square patch unit cell with and without the SRR is presented in Figure 3(b).Figure 3
(a) Design of the unit cell. (b) Comparison of the AMC-backed antenna with and without SRR.
(a)(b)


### 3.2. Design of the AMC-Backed Antenna

Two units of the proposed unit cell are spaced at a 1 mm distance from each other to form the AMC plane. The length and width of the AMC plane, “Lm” and “Wm”, are 44 mm and 22 mm, respectively. It is integrated onto the reverse side of the antenna to operate as a reflector. This is aimed at reducing coupling, maintaining a compact size, and improving the antenna’s forward gain. The AMC plane is integrated at a distance D = 15 mm from the radiator, as shown in Figure 4(a). To study the effects of the AMC plane on the performance of the antenna, the S11 of the proposed AMC-backed design is simulated and presented in Figure 4(b). It is seen that the reflection coefficient of the antenna improves by increasing the distance D from the AMC plane.Figure 4
(a) Perspective and cross-sectional view of the AMC-backed antenna. (b) |S11| of the antenna with and without AMC plane.
(a)(b)


## 3.1. AMC-Unit Cell

The structure of the proposed AMC-unit cell is presented in Figure3(a). It is designed on Rogers RT5880LZ substrate with the thickness of 0.25 mm, dielectric permittivity of 2, and loss tangent of 0.002, ɛr = 2, loss tangent of tanδ = 0.0021. The dimensions of the ring unit cell radius are R1 = 4.90 mm, R2 = 7.94 mm, R3 = 10.95 mm, R4 = 13.96 mm, whereas the split gap (G) is 1 mm and ring width (W) is 0.5 mm. The overall size of the square-shaped unit cell is 22 × 22 × 0.25 mm3. The comparison of the reflection phase of a square patch unit cell with and without the SRR is presented in Figure 3(b).Figure 3
(a) Design of the unit cell. (b) Comparison of the AMC-backed antenna with and without SRR.
(a)(b)


## 3.2. Design of the AMC-Backed Antenna

Two units of the proposed unit cell are spaced at a 1 mm distance from each other to form the AMC plane. The length and width of the AMC plane, “Lm” and “Wm”, are 44 mm and 22 mm, respectively. It is integrated onto the reverse side of the antenna to operate as a reflector. This is aimed at reducing coupling, maintaining a compact size, and improving the antenna’s forward gain. The AMC plane is integrated at a distance D = 15 mm from the radiator, as shown in Figure 4(a). To study the effects of the AMC plane on the performance of the antenna, the S11 of the proposed AMC-backed design is simulated and presented in Figure 4(b). It is seen that the reflection coefficient of the antenna improves by increasing the distance D from the AMC plane.Figure 4
(a) Perspective and cross-sectional view of the AMC-backed antenna. (b) |S11| of the antenna with and without AMC plane.
(a)(b)


## 4. Equivalent Circuit Model

An equivalent circuit model of the patch antenna and split ring resonator (SRR) is introduced in this section to simplify the estimation of the antenna’s resonant frequency, as shown in Figure5(a). The circuit model consists of an RLC (resistor-inductor-capacitor) circuit connected in series with a capacitor and a resistor [31]. Parameters L1 and C1 correspond to the inductance and capacitance of the slots and truncated patch, respectively, whereas C2 is related to the capacitance between the CPW ground plane and a microstrip line as shown in Figure 5(a). The inductance of the feed line and Z0 is the characteristic impedance of the line adjusted at 50 Ω. It is noticed that by increasing the values of the capacitor, the reflection coefficient (S11) of the circuit model varies from the higher frequency band to the lower frequency band, and the values of the parameters are given in Table 2. A simple RLC circuit is used to represent the planar monopole antenna while the other resistor and the capacitor are used for the discrete ground circular rings on the reverse side of the antenna substrate. A comparison of S11 from the full-wave simulations and the proposed circuit model is presented in Figure 5(b). Estimation of the resonant frequency (fr) using the equivalent circuit model can be performed using the following equation: (1)fr=12∏L1C1+C2.Figure 5
(a) Equivalent circuit model of the patch antenna. (b) Comparison ofS11 of the antenna from full-wave simulations and the proposed circuit model.
(a)(b)Table 2
Values of the components used in the circuit model.
InductorsValues (nH)CapacitorsValues (pF)ResistorsValues (Ω)L10.278C17R170L20.01C21.31Z050


## 5. Results and Discussion

The photograph of the fabricated prototype of the planar monopole antenna with the AMC is illustrated in Figure6. The reflection coefficient is lower than −10 dB for the desired frequency band antenna both with and without an AMC, with the former having a minimum reflection coefficient of −37.59 dB at 3.49 GHz and the antenna without SRR a reflection coefficient of −29.0 dB at 3.5 GHz. The measured reflection coefficient with and without AMC of −27.0 dB at 3.51 GHz and −34.5 dB at 3.44 GHz is as shown in Figure 7. The gain and bandwidth enhancement capability of the proposed AMC surface at the desired frequency band of 3.5 GHz is illustrated in Figure 8. It can be seen that the gain of the antenna before placing the AMC is relatively low. To achieve the higher gain with a compact size, the introduction of the AMC plane behind the antenna increased its gain up to 65% in comparison with the antenna without the AMC backing. A comparison between simulated and measured radiation patterns with and without AMC is shown in Figure 9. From the 2D radiation pattern, it can be observed that the proposed antenna has shown a quasi-omnidirectional radiation pattern without the AMC and became more directional when integrated with the AMC. This gain increase can be explained by the constructive phase introduced by the AMC plane from behind the antenna. Another important consideration to ensure effective gain improvement is the spacing between the antenna and the AMC surface.Figure 6
Photograph of the fabricated monopole and AMC: (a) front view and (b) back view.
(a)(b)Figure 7
Comparison of the measured S11 of the antenna with and without AMC.Figure 8
Simulated and measured realized gain of the antenna with and without AMC.Figure 9
Radiation patterns of the proposed antenna: (a) without and (b) with AMC at 3.5 GHz.
(a)(b)The antenna was measured in terms of reflection coefficient (S11) using a vector network analyzer (VNA) (Agilent 8722ES), as shown in Figure 10. On the other hand, its radiation patterns were measured in an anechoic chamber room, as shown in Figure 11. Table 3 compares the proposed planar monopole antenna with previous studies. From the comparison table, it can be seen that the proposed design is relatively compact in size and higher in gain. As shown in Figure 10, the peak gain of the antenna is compared with and without the AMC backing. The peak gain of the AMC-backed antenna is improved to 6.08 dB at 3.5 GHz. The gain without an AMC antenna is 2.8 dB at 3.5 GHz.Figure 10
Measurement setup of the reflection coefficient.Figure 11
Measurement setup of the radiation pattern.Table 3
Comparison between proposed designs with several relevant previous studies.
RefFreq (GHz)Substrate materialGain (dB)Proposed techniqueArea (mm2)/ λApplicationsDesign complexity[20]3.5FR-46.04Complementary split-ring resonator (CSRR)35 × 40/0.85 × 0.98WLAN/WiMAXSimple[29]2.4Rogers RO3003C5.1Artificial magnetic conductor (AMC)130.8 × 130.8/2.64 × 2.64Indoor/outdoor wireless body area network (WBAN)Simple[30]10FR-42 to 5.8Split-ring resonator (SRR)48 × 35/1.17 × 0.855GComplex[32]4.3Rogers RT/Duroid 58804.85Defected ground plane (DGS)58 × 22/1 × 0.38GPSSimple[33]0.9 to 2.6FR-42.6–4.6Stepped cut at four corners51 × 40/1.25 × 0.98LTESimple[34]2.45, 3.5, 4.6, 5.8FR-44.93, 5.92, 5.54, 4.95Artificial magnetic conductor (AMC)50 × 50/1.22 × 1.22WLAN, WiMAX, and 5GComplexThis work3.5Rogers RT/Duroid 5880LZ6.0Artificial magnetic conductor (AMC)40 × 30/0.69 × 0.515GSimple


## 6. Conclusion

In this paper, we use MTM in an inspired planar monopole antenna backed by an AMC plane is proposed in this work. The design process of the planar monopole antenna, AMC unit cell, and AMC plane has been presented, with the proposal of an equivalent circuit model. Simulations indicated that the operating range frequency of the planar monopole antenna with and without MTM is from 3.3 to 3.5 GHz and 3.41 to 3.67 GHz, respectively. On the other hand, the measurements indicated good agreements with simulations, with an operation between 3.4 and 3.6 GHz for 5G application. Due to the AMC backing, the monopole antenna also showed improved reflection coefficient and gain improvements, from 2.7 dB (without AMC) to 6 dB at 3.5 GHz, while maintaining a compact size. This indicates the potential of the proposed AMC-backed antenna for 5G application.



---

*Source: 6724175-2022-07-21.xml*