# Performance Evaluation of Glass-Epoxy-TiC Hybrid Composites Using Design of Experiment

Authors: Sangita Mohapatra; Sisir Mantry; S. K. Singh
Journal: Journal of Composites
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

The present paper reports the processing and solid particle erosion behavior of a multiphase composite consisting of epoxy resin reinforced with E-glass fiber and TiC particles. The TiC powder synthesized from ilmenite employing DC extended thermal plasma technique has been used as the filler in these glass epoxy composites. It is observed that with increasing percentage of filler particles, there is significant improvement in hardness and erosion wear performance. It is also observed that, among all the factors, impact velocity is the most significant factor followed by TiC percentage and impingement angle, while erodent size has the least significance on erosion of the reinforced composite. Taguchi's orthogonal arrays have been used to identify the controlling factors influencing the erosion wear rate.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Nowadays much attention is focused on the study of solid particle erosion behavior of fiber reinforced polymer composites. This is due to the high potential use of these materials in mechanical and structural applications in automobile, marine, and aerospace industries. Hence erosion resistance of polymer composites has become an important material property, particularly in selection of alternative materials.Polymer composites are often used as engineering as well as structural components where these are subjected to wear. Wear is damage to a solid surface usually involving progressive loss of materials, owing to relative motion between the surface and a contacting surface or substances [1]. Several investigations on friction and wear properties of PEEK and its composites filled with fibers, organic and inorganic fillers have been carried out [2, 3]. Yen and Dharan [4] have investigated the abrasive wear behavior of unidirectional fiber reinforced polymer composites. Chang et al. [5] have studied the tribological properties of fiber reinforced polymer composites like polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and polyetherimide (PEI). It has been observed that by incorporating filler particles into fiber-reinforced composites, synergistic effects can be achieved in the form of higher modulus and reduced material cost, yet accompanied with decreased strength and impact toughness [6–13].Durand et al. [14] investigated wear behavior of polymer-based model composites reinforced with different particles including TiC. TiC is an important nonoxide ceramics which exhibits high hardness, high strength, better wear, and corrosion resistance. These properties make the material useful in many applications such as metal forming dies, cutting tools, and wear resistant parts. So TiC has the potential to be used as a filler material in various polymer composites. Konopka et al. [15] studied abrasive wear behavior of nano and submicron size TiC particle reinforced polymer matrix composites. However, erosive wear behaviour of polymer composites reinforced with glass fibre and TiC particulate has not been adequately studied.TiC powder is synthesized from ilmenite ore, naturally occurring iron titanate (FeTiO3) which is abundant in nature. The particle size distribution, Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), and Raman study of TiC powder reveal that its quality is comparable to the commercially available TiC powder. So this TiC powder can be suitable filler for fabrication of low cost hybrid composites.The objective of the present investigation is to study the effect of glass fiber reinforcement and inclusion of TiC filler on the physical and mechanical properties as well as tribo-performance behavior of epoxy based composites under multiple impact conditions. An attempt has been made to optimize the process parameters for minimum wear rate.


## 2. Experimental Details

### 2.1. Preparation of TiC Powder from Ilmenite by Thermal Plasma

Ilmenite is one of the important ores of titanium. In the present investigation, TiC powder has been synthesized from the ilmenite concentrate by an indigenously developed extended arc plasma reactor. The reactor is a pot type reactor where graphite electrodes are arranged in a vertical configuration. The top graphite electrode is having an axial hole through which the plasma forming gas is introduced to the reactor hearth. The graphite crucible (anode) serves as the reactor hearth. The crucible is thermally insulated by bubble alumina in mild steel casing. The power to the reactor is supplied by a DC thyristor controlled power source. The detail of the reactor is described elsewhere [16].The raw materials used here are ilmenite concentrate and activated carbon. The ilmenite concentrate after grinding to very fine size is mixed with activated carbon homogeneously. The homogeneous mixture is then peletilized and dried. In a typical plasma experiment, the flow of argon gas was regulated at 1.0 L/min. The arc voltage and current were maintained at 50 V and 300 A, respectively. The overall process of the carbothermal reduction of ilmenite (FeTiO3) with carbon in argon thermal plasma resulted in the formation of Fe-TiC composite. The product was crushed to fine size and leached with HCl to remove Fe from the Fe-TiC composite. During leaching, the solid to liquid ratio is maintained at 1 : 10 and the strength of the acid (HCl) was 2/4 N. The temperature of the solution during leaching was approximately 100°C. The TiC powder thus prepared has been characterized by XRD and SEM (FESEM Zeiss, Supra-55). The microstructure and XRD analysis of TiC power produced from ilmenite is shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively.Figure 1
SEM micrograph of TiC powder produced.Figure 2
XRD results of TiC powder.


### 2.2. Fabrication of Composites

The titanium carbide (TiC) reinforced hybrid composites were prepared by hand lay-up technique followed by light compression moulding using epoxy resin as the matrix material and woven E-glass fibers as the reinforcement. The epoxy resin and the hardener (HY951) are supplied by Ciba Geigy India Ltd. where the woven E-glass fibers are supplied by Saint Goblin Ltd., India. The particulate fillers TiC with particle size 12μm or less prepared by thermal plasma varies as 0, 10, 15, and 20 wt% but with fixed glass-fiber loading (50 wt%) used in the composite fabrication. First, epoxy is mixed with hardener in the ratio of 10 : 1 by weight. Then the particle fillers are mixed thoroughly in the resin before reinforcement of the fiber materials into the matrix body. Silicon spray facilitates easy removal of the composite from the mould after curing as a releasing agent. A diamond cutter has been used for cutting test samples of suitable dimensions. Utmost care has been taken to maintain uniformity and homogeneity of the composite.


### 2.3. Density and Void Fraction

The theoretical density of composite materials in terms of weight fraction can easily be obtained as for the following equations given by Agarwal and Broutman [18]:
(1)
ρ
c
t
=
1
(
W
f
/
ρ
f
)
+
(
W
m
/
ρ
m
)
,
where W and ρ represent the weight fraction and density respectively. The suffixes f, m, and c
t stand for the fiber, matrix and the composite materials, respectively.The composites under this investigation consist of three components, namely, matrix, fiber, and particulate filler. Hence the modified form of the expression for the density of the composite can be written as(2)
ρ
c
t
=
1
(
W
f
/
ρ
f
)
+
(
W
m
/
ρ
m
)
+
(
W
p
/
ρ
p
)
,
where the suffix “p” indicates the particulate filler materials.The actual density (ρ
c
e) of the composite, however, can be determined experimentally by simple water immersion technique. The volume fraction of voids (V
v) in the composites is calculated using the following equation:
(3)
V
v
=
ρ
c
t
-
ρ
c
e
ρ
c
t
.


### 2.4. Test of Microhardness

A Leco micro hardness tester is used for measurement of micro hardness. A diamond indenter in the form of a right pyramid with a square base and an angle 136° between opposite faces has been used in this tester. This indenter is forced into the material under a loadF. In the present study, the load considered F
=
0.5 N. The indentation left on the surface of the material after removal of the load has two diagonals X and Y. These diagonals are measured and their arithmetic mean L is calculated. The Vickers hardness number is calculated using the following equation:
(4)
H
v
=
0.1889
F
L
2
,
L
=
X
+
Y
2
,
where F is the applied load (N), L is the diagonal of square impression (mm), X is the horizontal length (mm), and Y is the vertical length (mm).


### 2.5. Erosion Test

The schematic diagram of erosion test rig confirming to ASTM G 76 has been shown in Figure3 [17]. The setup consisting of an air compressor, an air particle mixing chamber, and an accelerating chamber is capable of creating reproducible erosive situations for assessing erosion wear resistance of the prepared composite samples. The particles are mixed with dry compressed air and the mixture is fed at a constant rate from a sand flow control knob through the nozzle tube. There is a convergent brass nozzle of 3 mm internal diameter through which when the mixture is passed, the particles get accelerated. These particles impact the specimen which can be held at different angles with respect to the direction of erodent flow using a swivel and an adjustable sample clip. Standard double disc method is used for determining the velocity of the eroding particles [19]. Dry aluminum oxide (spherical) of different particle sizes (50, 100, 200, and 300 μm) is used as erodent in the present study. Acetone is used for cleaning the samples, and then they are dried and weighed using a precision electronic balance to an accuracy of ±0.1 mg before and after the erosion trials. Erosion rate is calculated by using the weight loss recorded.Figure 3
Schematic diagram of the erosion rig [17].


### 2.6. Taguchi Experimental Design

Every single discipline has researchers carrying out experiments to observe and understand a certain process or to discover the interaction and effect of different variables. From a scientific viewpoint, these experiments are either one or a series of tests to either confirm a hypothesis or to understand a process in further detail. Experiments from a manufacturing point of view, however, are concerned with finding the optimum product and process, which is both cost effective and of a high quality. In order to achieve a meaningful end result, several experiments are usually carried out. The investigator needs to know the factors involved, the levels assigned to each factor and a method to calculate and quantify the response of each factor. This one-factor-at-a-time approach will provide the most favorable level for each factor, but not the optimum combination of all the interacting factors involved. Thus, experimentation in this scenario can be considered as an iterative process. Although it will provide a result, such methods are not time or cost effective. But the design of experiments is a scientific approach to effectively plan and perform experiments, using statistics. In such designs, the combination of each factor at every level is studied to determine the combination that would yield the best result. The advantage of such design schemes is that it will always determine the effect of factors and possible interactions (between factors) on the performance output. Taguchi design of experiment is a powerful analysis tool for modeling and analyzing the influence of control factors on performance output. Selection of the control factors is the most important stage in the design of an experiment. Exhaustive literature review on erosion behavior of polymer composites reveals that parameters, namely, impact velocity, impingement angle, fiber loading, filler content, erodent size, and so forth largely influence the erosion rate of polymer composites [20–31]. In the present work, the impact of five such parameters, namely, velocity of impact, filler percentage, impingement angle, erodent size, and erodent temperature each at four levels, are studied using L
16 (45) orthogonal design. Table 1 represents the operating parameters and the selected levels. The tests are conducted as per experimental designs given in Table 2. In Table 5, each of the second to sixth columns represents a test parameter and a row gives a test condition which is nothing but combination of parameter levels. Five parameters each at four levels would require 45 = 1024 runs in a full factorial experiment, whereas Taguchi’s factorial experiment approach reduces it to 16 runs which is a great advantage in terms of cost and time. The second column is assigned to impact velocity (A), the third column to impingement angle (B), fourth column to erodent size (C), the fifth column to filler loading (D), and the sixth column to erodent temperature (E). The experimental observations are further transformed into a signal-to-noise (S
/
N) ratio. Depending on the type of characteristics, there are several S
/
N ratios available:Table 1
Levels of the variables used in the experiment.
Control factor
Level
Units
I
II
III
IV
A: velocity of impact
33
47
57
68
m/s
B: impingement angle
30
45
60
90
°
C: erodent size
50
100
200
300
μm
D: TiC percentage
0
10
15
20
%
E: erodent temperature
25
50
75
100
°CTable 2
Erosion test conditions.
Sl. number
Test parameter
Type/value
1
Erodent
Aluminum oxide
2
Erodent size (μm)
50, 100, 200 and 300
3
Erodent shape
Spherical
4
Impact angle (°)
30, 45, 60 and 90
5
Impact velocity (m/s)
33, 47,  57 and 68
6
Erodent feed frequency (Hrz)
10
7
Test temperature (°C)
25, 50, 75 and 100
8
Nozzle to sample distance (mm)
10“Smaller the better” characteristic:(5)
S
N
=
-
10
log
⁡
1
n
(
∑
y
2
)
.“Nominal the better” characteristics:(6)
S
N
=
-
10
log
⁡
1
n
(
∑
Y
¯
S
Y
2
)
.“Larger the better” characteristics:(7)
S
N
=
-
10
log
⁡
1
n
(
∑
1
y
2
)
,
where n is the number of observations and y is the observed data. The S
/
N ratio for minimum erosion rate coming under “smaller is better” characteristic can be calculated as logarithmic transformation of the loss function as shown in (5).


## 2.1. Preparation of TiC Powder from Ilmenite by Thermal Plasma

Ilmenite is one of the important ores of titanium. In the present investigation, TiC powder has been synthesized from the ilmenite concentrate by an indigenously developed extended arc plasma reactor. The reactor is a pot type reactor where graphite electrodes are arranged in a vertical configuration. The top graphite electrode is having an axial hole through which the plasma forming gas is introduced to the reactor hearth. The graphite crucible (anode) serves as the reactor hearth. The crucible is thermally insulated by bubble alumina in mild steel casing. The power to the reactor is supplied by a DC thyristor controlled power source. The detail of the reactor is described elsewhere [16].The raw materials used here are ilmenite concentrate and activated carbon. The ilmenite concentrate after grinding to very fine size is mixed with activated carbon homogeneously. The homogeneous mixture is then peletilized and dried. In a typical plasma experiment, the flow of argon gas was regulated at 1.0 L/min. The arc voltage and current were maintained at 50 V and 300 A, respectively. The overall process of the carbothermal reduction of ilmenite (FeTiO3) with carbon in argon thermal plasma resulted in the formation of Fe-TiC composite. The product was crushed to fine size and leached with HCl to remove Fe from the Fe-TiC composite. During leaching, the solid to liquid ratio is maintained at 1 : 10 and the strength of the acid (HCl) was 2/4 N. The temperature of the solution during leaching was approximately 100°C. The TiC powder thus prepared has been characterized by XRD and SEM (FESEM Zeiss, Supra-55). The microstructure and XRD analysis of TiC power produced from ilmenite is shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively.Figure 1
SEM micrograph of TiC powder produced.Figure 2
XRD results of TiC powder.


## 2.2. Fabrication of Composites

The titanium carbide (TiC) reinforced hybrid composites were prepared by hand lay-up technique followed by light compression moulding using epoxy resin as the matrix material and woven E-glass fibers as the reinforcement. The epoxy resin and the hardener (HY951) are supplied by Ciba Geigy India Ltd. where the woven E-glass fibers are supplied by Saint Goblin Ltd., India. The particulate fillers TiC with particle size 12μm or less prepared by thermal plasma varies as 0, 10, 15, and 20 wt% but with fixed glass-fiber loading (50 wt%) used in the composite fabrication. First, epoxy is mixed with hardener in the ratio of 10 : 1 by weight. Then the particle fillers are mixed thoroughly in the resin before reinforcement of the fiber materials into the matrix body. Silicon spray facilitates easy removal of the composite from the mould after curing as a releasing agent. A diamond cutter has been used for cutting test samples of suitable dimensions. Utmost care has been taken to maintain uniformity and homogeneity of the composite.


## 2.3. Density and Void Fraction

The theoretical density of composite materials in terms of weight fraction can easily be obtained as for the following equations given by Agarwal and Broutman [18]:
(1)
ρ
c
t
=
1
(
W
f
/
ρ
f
)
+
(
W
m
/
ρ
m
)
,
where W and ρ represent the weight fraction and density respectively. The suffixes f, m, and c
t stand for the fiber, matrix and the composite materials, respectively.The composites under this investigation consist of three components, namely, matrix, fiber, and particulate filler. Hence the modified form of the expression for the density of the composite can be written as(2)
ρ
c
t
=
1
(
W
f
/
ρ
f
)
+
(
W
m
/
ρ
m
)
+
(
W
p
/
ρ
p
)
,
where the suffix “p” indicates the particulate filler materials.The actual density (ρ
c
e) of the composite, however, can be determined experimentally by simple water immersion technique. The volume fraction of voids (V
v) in the composites is calculated using the following equation:
(3)
V
v
=
ρ
c
t
-
ρ
c
e
ρ
c
t
.


## 2.4. Test of Microhardness

A Leco micro hardness tester is used for measurement of micro hardness. A diamond indenter in the form of a right pyramid with a square base and an angle 136° between opposite faces has been used in this tester. This indenter is forced into the material under a loadF. In the present study, the load considered F
=
0.5 N. The indentation left on the surface of the material after removal of the load has two diagonals X and Y. These diagonals are measured and their arithmetic mean L is calculated. The Vickers hardness number is calculated using the following equation:
(4)
H
v
=
0.1889
F
L
2
,
L
=
X
+
Y
2
,
where F is the applied load (N), L is the diagonal of square impression (mm), X is the horizontal length (mm), and Y is the vertical length (mm).


## 2.5. Erosion Test

The schematic diagram of erosion test rig confirming to ASTM G 76 has been shown in Figure3 [17]. The setup consisting of an air compressor, an air particle mixing chamber, and an accelerating chamber is capable of creating reproducible erosive situations for assessing erosion wear resistance of the prepared composite samples. The particles are mixed with dry compressed air and the mixture is fed at a constant rate from a sand flow control knob through the nozzle tube. There is a convergent brass nozzle of 3 mm internal diameter through which when the mixture is passed, the particles get accelerated. These particles impact the specimen which can be held at different angles with respect to the direction of erodent flow using a swivel and an adjustable sample clip. Standard double disc method is used for determining the velocity of the eroding particles [19]. Dry aluminum oxide (spherical) of different particle sizes (50, 100, 200, and 300 μm) is used as erodent in the present study. Acetone is used for cleaning the samples, and then they are dried and weighed using a precision electronic balance to an accuracy of ±0.1 mg before and after the erosion trials. Erosion rate is calculated by using the weight loss recorded.Figure 3
Schematic diagram of the erosion rig [17].


## 2.6. Taguchi Experimental Design

Every single discipline has researchers carrying out experiments to observe and understand a certain process or to discover the interaction and effect of different variables. From a scientific viewpoint, these experiments are either one or a series of tests to either confirm a hypothesis or to understand a process in further detail. Experiments from a manufacturing point of view, however, are concerned with finding the optimum product and process, which is both cost effective and of a high quality. In order to achieve a meaningful end result, several experiments are usually carried out. The investigator needs to know the factors involved, the levels assigned to each factor and a method to calculate and quantify the response of each factor. This one-factor-at-a-time approach will provide the most favorable level for each factor, but not the optimum combination of all the interacting factors involved. Thus, experimentation in this scenario can be considered as an iterative process. Although it will provide a result, such methods are not time or cost effective. But the design of experiments is a scientific approach to effectively plan and perform experiments, using statistics. In such designs, the combination of each factor at every level is studied to determine the combination that would yield the best result. The advantage of such design schemes is that it will always determine the effect of factors and possible interactions (between factors) on the performance output. Taguchi design of experiment is a powerful analysis tool for modeling and analyzing the influence of control factors on performance output. Selection of the control factors is the most important stage in the design of an experiment. Exhaustive literature review on erosion behavior of polymer composites reveals that parameters, namely, impact velocity, impingement angle, fiber loading, filler content, erodent size, and so forth largely influence the erosion rate of polymer composites [20–31]. In the present work, the impact of five such parameters, namely, velocity of impact, filler percentage, impingement angle, erodent size, and erodent temperature each at four levels, are studied using L
16 (45) orthogonal design. Table 1 represents the operating parameters and the selected levels. The tests are conducted as per experimental designs given in Table 2. In Table 5, each of the second to sixth columns represents a test parameter and a row gives a test condition which is nothing but combination of parameter levels. Five parameters each at four levels would require 45 = 1024 runs in a full factorial experiment, whereas Taguchi’s factorial experiment approach reduces it to 16 runs which is a great advantage in terms of cost and time. The second column is assigned to impact velocity (A), the third column to impingement angle (B), fourth column to erodent size (C), the fifth column to filler loading (D), and the sixth column to erodent temperature (E). The experimental observations are further transformed into a signal-to-noise (S
/
N) ratio. Depending on the type of characteristics, there are several S
/
N ratios available:Table 1
Levels of the variables used in the experiment.
Control factor
Level
Units
I
II
III
IV
A: velocity of impact
33
47
57
68
m/s
B: impingement angle
30
45
60
90
°
C: erodent size
50
100
200
300
μm
D: TiC percentage
0
10
15
20
%
E: erodent temperature
25
50
75
100
°CTable 2
Erosion test conditions.
Sl. number
Test parameter
Type/value
1
Erodent
Aluminum oxide
2
Erodent size (μm)
50, 100, 200 and 300
3
Erodent shape
Spherical
4
Impact angle (°)
30, 45, 60 and 90
5
Impact velocity (m/s)
33, 47,  57 and 68
6
Erodent feed frequency (Hrz)
10
7
Test temperature (°C)
25, 50, 75 and 100
8
Nozzle to sample distance (mm)
10“Smaller the better” characteristic:(5)
S
N
=
-
10
log
⁡
1
n
(
∑
y
2
)
.“Nominal the better” characteristics:(6)
S
N
=
-
10
log
⁡
1
n
(
∑
Y
¯
S
Y
2
)
.“Larger the better” characteristics:(7)
S
N
=
-
10
log
⁡
1
n
(
∑
1
y
2
)
,
where n is the number of observations and y is the observed data. The S
/
N ratio for minimum erosion rate coming under “smaller is better” characteristic can be calculated as logarithmic transformation of the loss function as shown in (5).


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Density and Void Fraction Analysis

The theoretical and measured densities of glass-epoxy composites with TiC filler along with the corresponding volume fraction of voids are presented in Table3. It is observed that the theoretically calculated density values of the composites for different weight fractions using (2) are not equal to the experimentally measured values. It is evident from Table 3 that the density values for glass-epoxy composites increase with increase in filler content. The filler contains irregular particles and as the percentage increases, the void fraction increases due to improper wetting and formation of air bubbles and dissolved gases dispersion of filler into polymeric matrix. It can be reduced by proper stirring, which isnot much adequate because of hand lay-up technique.Table 3
Density and volume fraction of voids.
Composition
Theoretical density (gm/cc)
Measured density (gm/cc)
Volume fraction of voids (%)
Glass-epoxy + 0 wt% TiC
1.544
1.530
0.906
Glass-epoxy + 10 wt% TiC
1.831
1.761
3.823
Glass-epoxy + 15 wt% TiC
1.945
1.876
3.547
Glass-epoxy + 20 wt% TiC
2.070
2.009
2.95


### 3.2. Microhardness Study

The variation of composite microhardness with the weight fraction of TiC particulates is shown in Table4.Table 4
Microhardness of polymer composites.
TiC in wt%
X
Y
L
=
(
X
+
Y
)
/
2
Micro hardness (H
v)
0
54.2
59.8
57
29
10
49.21
54.67
51.94
35
15
45.52
49.32
47.42
42
20
40.89
43.53
42.21
53Table 5
L16 Orthogonal array design with output and S/N ratio.
Sl. number
Impact velocity (A)  in m/s
Impingement angle (B)in degree
Erodent size (C)in µm
Filler content (D)in wt%
Erodent temp. (E)in °C
Erosion rate (Er)in mg/kg
S/N ratio in db
1
33
30
50
0
25
102.146
−40.1844
2
33
45
100
10
50
97.583
−39.7875
3
33
60
200
15
75
93.249
−39.3929
4
33
90
300
20
100
36.862
−31.3316
5
47
30
100
15
100
118.856
−41.5004
6
47
45
50
20
75
91.147
−39.1948
7
47
60
300
0
50
247.486
−47.8710
8
47
90
200
10
25
152.367
−43.6578
9
57
30
200
20
50
156.657
−43.8990
10
57
45
300
15
25
213.314
−46.5804
11
57
60
50
10
100
265.143
−48.4696
12
57
90
100
0
75
263.146
−48.4039
13
68
30
300
10
75
330.346
−50.3794
14
68
45
200
0
100
368.034
−51.3178
15
68
60
100
20
25
251.035
−47.9947
16
68
90
50
15
50
238.382
−47.5455It is seen that with the incorporation of filler particulates into the composites, the mean hardness is seen to have improved as shown in Figure4. In hardness test, a compressive or pressing stress is in action. So the polymeric matrix phase and the solid filler phase would be pressed together and touch each other more tightly.Figure 4
Variation of microhardness of the composites with TiC content.Thus, the interface can transfer pressure more effectively although the interfacial bond may be poor. This might have resulted in enhancement of hardness. Similar property modification has been observed in case of polyurethane matrix composite reinforced with Al2O3 particles [22].


### 3.3. Taguchi Analysis of the Erosion Test Results

The erosion wear rates of TiC filled glass-epoxy matrix composites under various test conditions are given in Table5. The last columns represent S
/
N ratio of the erosion rate, which is in fact the average of three replications. The overall mean for the S
/
N ratio of the erosion rate is found to be −44.2194 db of TiC composites. The analysis is made using the popular software specifically used for design of experiment applications known as MINITAB 14. The graphical sketch in Figure 5 (obtained using MINITAB14 software) represents the influence of individual factor influencing erosion rate of TiC filled glass-epoxy composites in an interactive environment, that is, considering the mean of S
/
N ratio of single control factor mentioned in corresponding iterations. Slope of each curve in the figure is a measure of the influence of that factor on the output. The S
/
N ratio response is also given in Table 6. From the figure and the table, it can be concluded that among all the factors, impact velocity is the most significant factor followed by TiC percentage and impingement angle, while the erodent size has the least significance on erosion of the reinforced composite. It also leads to the conclusion that factor combination of A
1, B
4, C
1, D
4, and E
4 gives minimum erosion rate.Table 6
Response table for signal-to-noise ratios.
Level
A
B
C
D
E
1
−37.67
−43.99
−43.85
−46.94
−44.60
2
−43.06
−44.22
−44.42
−45.57
−44.78
3
−46.84
−45.93
−44.57
−43.75
−44.34
4
−49.31
−42.73
−44.04
−40.61
−43.15
Delta
11.64
3.20
0.72
6.34
1.62
Rank
1
3
5
2
4
Bold font refers to the factors and their assigned ranks.Figure 5
Effect of control factors on erosion rate.


### 3.4. Steady State Erosion Rate

The erosion rate of the composites is generally correlated with many operating parameters like impact velocity, impact angle, and erodent size. Angle of impingement is one of the strong factors on which the erosion rate depends. If maximum erosion takes place at 15–30°, it shows the ductile response of the material and if maximum erosion takes place at normal impact that is, 90°, the response of the material to solid particle erosion is brittle in nature. Semiductile behaviour is characterized by the maximum erosion rate at 45–60°. In the present study, erosion wear rate of glass-epoxy composites filled with TiC particle with varying composition from 0–20 wt% with different angle of impingement is studied by conducting experiments under specific operating conditions (impact velocity remains constant at 68 m/s and erodent used are of size 200μm). The results are shown in Figure 6, which shows that the maximum erosion takes place at 60° showing semiductile response to solid particle erosion. Similar semiductile behaviour of other polymer composites is also observed in many literatures [32, 33].Figure 6
Effect of impingement angle on erosion rate.


### 3.5. Surface Morphology

The surface microstructures of the uneroded and eroded composite samples are observed under SEM (FESEM Zeiss, Supra-55). As shown in Figure7(a) the surfaces are reasonably homogeneous. No cracks are visible although some voids and pores are present. The eroded surfaces of TiC filled glass-epoxy composites subjected to different impingement angle at different impact velocities are shown in Figure 7(b)–Figure 7(f). It shows local removal of epoxy material from the impacted surface resulting in exposure of fibers to the excessive erosive environment. The morphology also reveals that due to particle impact on fibers, there is formation of transverse crack and longitudinal crack that break the fibers as shown in Figure 7(b). The propagation of both transverse and longitudinal cracks is visible across the fibers and those cracks have grown as a result of which fragmentation takes place. The damage mechanism is reflected by formation of microcracks at surface and/or subsurface regions, which finally forms wear debris. The fibres are completely broken by means of shearing action and protruding of fibers from matrix can be seen due to impingement of particles at higher impact velocity. Figure 7(e) shows the surface of 20% TiC filled composite eroded at 90° impingement angle at an impact velocity of 33 m/s. It is clearly visible that at minimum velocity and 90° impingement angle, erosion is minimum. Figure 7(f) shows maximum erosion of 0% filled composite eroded at an angle of 45° at an impact velocity 68 m/s. It is also visible from Figures 7(b), 7(c), and 7(d) that for all the composites, the erosion rate is more at an impingement angle of 60°. These results are in agreement with some previous observations [28, 34, 35].(a) uneroded composite. (b) 10% filled composite eroded at an impingement angle of 60°, impact velocity 47 m/s. (c) 15% filled composite eroded at an impingement angle of 60°, impact velocity 33 m/s.(d) 20% filled composite eroded at an impingement angle of 60°, impact velocity 57 m/s. (e) 20% filled composite eroded at an impingement angle of 90°, impact velocity 33 m/s. (f) 0% filled composite eroded at an impingement angle of 45°, impact velocity 68 m/s.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)


## 3.1. Density and Void Fraction Analysis

The theoretical and measured densities of glass-epoxy composites with TiC filler along with the corresponding volume fraction of voids are presented in Table3. It is observed that the theoretically calculated density values of the composites for different weight fractions using (2) are not equal to the experimentally measured values. It is evident from Table 3 that the density values for glass-epoxy composites increase with increase in filler content. The filler contains irregular particles and as the percentage increases, the void fraction increases due to improper wetting and formation of air bubbles and dissolved gases dispersion of filler into polymeric matrix. It can be reduced by proper stirring, which isnot much adequate because of hand lay-up technique.Table 3
Density and volume fraction of voids.
Composition
Theoretical density (gm/cc)
Measured density (gm/cc)
Volume fraction of voids (%)
Glass-epoxy + 0 wt% TiC
1.544
1.530
0.906
Glass-epoxy + 10 wt% TiC
1.831
1.761
3.823
Glass-epoxy + 15 wt% TiC
1.945
1.876
3.547
Glass-epoxy + 20 wt% TiC
2.070
2.009
2.95


## 3.2. Microhardness Study

The variation of composite microhardness with the weight fraction of TiC particulates is shown in Table4.Table 4
Microhardness of polymer composites.
TiC in wt%
X
Y
L
=
(
X
+
Y
)
/
2
Micro hardness (H
v)
0
54.2
59.8
57
29
10
49.21
54.67
51.94
35
15
45.52
49.32
47.42
42
20
40.89
43.53
42.21
53Table 5
L16 Orthogonal array design with output and S/N ratio.
Sl. number
Impact velocity (A)  in m/s
Impingement angle (B)in degree
Erodent size (C)in µm
Filler content (D)in wt%
Erodent temp. (E)in °C
Erosion rate (Er)in mg/kg
S/N ratio in db
1
33
30
50
0
25
102.146
−40.1844
2
33
45
100
10
50
97.583
−39.7875
3
33
60
200
15
75
93.249
−39.3929
4
33
90
300
20
100
36.862
−31.3316
5
47
30
100
15
100
118.856
−41.5004
6
47
45
50
20
75
91.147
−39.1948
7
47
60
300
0
50
247.486
−47.8710
8
47
90
200
10
25
152.367
−43.6578
9
57
30
200
20
50
156.657
−43.8990
10
57
45
300
15
25
213.314
−46.5804
11
57
60
50
10
100
265.143
−48.4696
12
57
90
100
0
75
263.146
−48.4039
13
68
30
300
10
75
330.346
−50.3794
14
68
45
200
0
100
368.034
−51.3178
15
68
60
100
20
25
251.035
−47.9947
16
68
90
50
15
50
238.382
−47.5455It is seen that with the incorporation of filler particulates into the composites, the mean hardness is seen to have improved as shown in Figure4. In hardness test, a compressive or pressing stress is in action. So the polymeric matrix phase and the solid filler phase would be pressed together and touch each other more tightly.Figure 4
Variation of microhardness of the composites with TiC content.Thus, the interface can transfer pressure more effectively although the interfacial bond may be poor. This might have resulted in enhancement of hardness. Similar property modification has been observed in case of polyurethane matrix composite reinforced with Al2O3 particles [22].


## 3.3. Taguchi Analysis of the Erosion Test Results

The erosion wear rates of TiC filled glass-epoxy matrix composites under various test conditions are given in Table5. The last columns represent S
/
N ratio of the erosion rate, which is in fact the average of three replications. The overall mean for the S
/
N ratio of the erosion rate is found to be −44.2194 db of TiC composites. The analysis is made using the popular software specifically used for design of experiment applications known as MINITAB 14. The graphical sketch in Figure 5 (obtained using MINITAB14 software) represents the influence of individual factor influencing erosion rate of TiC filled glass-epoxy composites in an interactive environment, that is, considering the mean of S
/
N ratio of single control factor mentioned in corresponding iterations. Slope of each curve in the figure is a measure of the influence of that factor on the output. The S
/
N ratio response is also given in Table 6. From the figure and the table, it can be concluded that among all the factors, impact velocity is the most significant factor followed by TiC percentage and impingement angle, while the erodent size has the least significance on erosion of the reinforced composite. It also leads to the conclusion that factor combination of A
1, B
4, C
1, D
4, and E
4 gives minimum erosion rate.Table 6
Response table for signal-to-noise ratios.
Level
A
B
C
D
E
1
−37.67
−43.99
−43.85
−46.94
−44.60
2
−43.06
−44.22
−44.42
−45.57
−44.78
3
−46.84
−45.93
−44.57
−43.75
−44.34
4
−49.31
−42.73
−44.04
−40.61
−43.15
Delta
11.64
3.20
0.72
6.34
1.62
Rank
1
3
5
2
4
Bold font refers to the factors and their assigned ranks.Figure 5
Effect of control factors on erosion rate.


## 3.4. Steady State Erosion Rate

The erosion rate of the composites is generally correlated with many operating parameters like impact velocity, impact angle, and erodent size. Angle of impingement is one of the strong factors on which the erosion rate depends. If maximum erosion takes place at 15–30°, it shows the ductile response of the material and if maximum erosion takes place at normal impact that is, 90°, the response of the material to solid particle erosion is brittle in nature. Semiductile behaviour is characterized by the maximum erosion rate at 45–60°. In the present study, erosion wear rate of glass-epoxy composites filled with TiC particle with varying composition from 0–20 wt% with different angle of impingement is studied by conducting experiments under specific operating conditions (impact velocity remains constant at 68 m/s and erodent used are of size 200μm). The results are shown in Figure 6, which shows that the maximum erosion takes place at 60° showing semiductile response to solid particle erosion. Similar semiductile behaviour of other polymer composites is also observed in many literatures [32, 33].Figure 6
Effect of impingement angle on erosion rate.


## 3.5. Surface Morphology

The surface microstructures of the uneroded and eroded composite samples are observed under SEM (FESEM Zeiss, Supra-55). As shown in Figure7(a) the surfaces are reasonably homogeneous. No cracks are visible although some voids and pores are present. The eroded surfaces of TiC filled glass-epoxy composites subjected to different impingement angle at different impact velocities are shown in Figure 7(b)–Figure 7(f). It shows local removal of epoxy material from the impacted surface resulting in exposure of fibers to the excessive erosive environment. The morphology also reveals that due to particle impact on fibers, there is formation of transverse crack and longitudinal crack that break the fibers as shown in Figure 7(b). The propagation of both transverse and longitudinal cracks is visible across the fibers and those cracks have grown as a result of which fragmentation takes place. The damage mechanism is reflected by formation of microcracks at surface and/or subsurface regions, which finally forms wear debris. The fibres are completely broken by means of shearing action and protruding of fibers from matrix can be seen due to impingement of particles at higher impact velocity. Figure 7(e) shows the surface of 20% TiC filled composite eroded at 90° impingement angle at an impact velocity of 33 m/s. It is clearly visible that at minimum velocity and 90° impingement angle, erosion is minimum. Figure 7(f) shows maximum erosion of 0% filled composite eroded at an angle of 45° at an impact velocity 68 m/s. It is also visible from Figures 7(b), 7(c), and 7(d) that for all the composites, the erosion rate is more at an impingement angle of 60°. These results are in agreement with some previous observations [28, 34, 35].(a) uneroded composite. (b) 10% filled composite eroded at an impingement angle of 60°, impact velocity 47 m/s. (c) 15% filled composite eroded at an impingement angle of 60°, impact velocity 33 m/s.(d) 20% filled composite eroded at an impingement angle of 60°, impact velocity 57 m/s. (e) 20% filled composite eroded at an impingement angle of 90°, impact velocity 33 m/s. (f) 0% filled composite eroded at an impingement angle of 45°, impact velocity 68 m/s.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)


## 4. Conclusions

(i)
Successful fabrication of multicomponent hybrid glass-epoxy composites with reinforcement of TiC prepared by plasma processing route is possible.
(ii)
These composites have adequate potential for applications in highly erosive environments.
(iii)
The erosion wear performance of the composites shows significant improvement with the addition of TiC filler.
(iv)
The presence of particulate fillers (titanium carbide) in these composites improves their erosion wear resistance and this improvement depends on the weight content of the filler.
(v)
Among all the factors, impact velocity is the most significant factor followed by TiC percentage and impingement angle, while the erodent size has the least significance on erosion rate.
(vi)
The future investigations can be extended to newer composites using other ceramic fillers and the resulting experimental findings can be similarly analyzed.



---

*Source: 670659-2014-02-09.xml*