# Analysis of the Impact of ESG on Corporate Financial Performance under the Epidemic Based on Static and Dynamic Panel Data

Authors: Weizhen Gao; Menggang Li; Chengzhang Zou
Journal: Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

Listed firms all over the globe are moving their focus from short-term profit maximization to long-term environmental, social, and governance (ESG) objectives. Most business leaders are now cognizant of the growing importance of ESG concerns, which may have an effect on an organization’s financial health as well as its reputation in the marketplace. A recent study found that countries with strong ESG performance may be able to improve their financial performance. Yet, in China, the subject of “how does ESG impact financial performance” has received little attention. In this paper, we examine the link between ESG operations and financial indices in China’s publicly traded firms using dynamic and static panel data analysis. We begin by gathering financial data and preprocessing it usingz-score normalization. The consequence of ESG variables on the financial performance of the company under the pandemic was investigated using statistical analytic techniques such as the Pearson correlation test, logistic regression model, and Fisher’s exact test. Due to the study’s dynamic and static data, comprehensive ESG has a considerable influence on corporate value and profitability per share. The impact of ESG variables on the financial performance of the company in the event of a pandemic was analyzed using analytical methods such as Pearson correlation, logistic regression, and Fisher’s exact test. Performance in ESG may boost financial performance, which could impact investors, business administrators, decision-makers, and industry regulations.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations are becoming increasingly prevalent in investment choices throughout the world. The ESG criteria are a collection of principles that investors may use to evaluate potential investments based on their operational activities. A company’s efforts to combat climate change may be seen in the company’s attempts to minimize greenhouse gas emissions, to manage waste, and to employ renewable energy [1]. There has been an increase in academic interest in connection among the performances of ESG and financial and the durability of organizations during the recent pandemic crisis. The cost of technology and organizational structures that rely on social isolation is referred to as pandemic resilience. After accounting for risk factors, they discovered that organizations with higher resistance to social distance fared better throughout the pandemic than those with lesser resilience [2].The ongoing discussion on the link between ESG and financial performance (FIN) remained unresolved due to a lack of clear evidence and consensus among researchers. While some research represents a negative connection among the performances of ESG and financial, others show a catalytic effect (i.e., a positive) or no effect. As a result, there is some disagreement over the direction in which financial successes are linked to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) outcomes [3] [4]. Environmental and social responsibility has become more important to legislators and authorities throughout the world in recent years. The stock price of a firm and other aspects of its sustainability goals may be affected by ESG considerations. In this paradigm, financial performance is employed as an intermediary variable when examining the consequence of ESG issues on stock market worth. Linear regression and mediation effects models are used to study how environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors affect an organization’s value and how these factors are transmitted to the market [5].For policymakers and investors, ESG performance is becoming more essential. In spite of the similarities between ESG and CSR, there is a tiny distinction between the two. ESG’s influence on a company’s economic and financial success has received increasing attention. Investors, management, and other stakeholders can use ESG reports and ratings to review and monitor the performance of a company over time [6] [7]. Hence, dynamic and static panel data analysis is provided in this article for analyzing the consequence of ESG on business financial performance in the face of the pandemic. Construction of the entire paper: part II = literature and the problem statement; part III = proposed methodology; part IV = performance analysis; part V = conclusion.


## 2. Literature Review

The importance of ESG considerations in savings’ decisions is growing throughout the world. Investors may implement the ESG criteria to analyze possible investments based on their operations. Recent academic reports are determined on the relationship involving both the ESG and financial performances and the durability of organizations during the recent pandemic crisis. An organization that relies on social isolation as a means of technology or organizational structure is said to have pandemic resilience. As a result of a lack of clear evidence and consensus among researchers, the link between environmental, social, and financial performance (FIN) has remained unresolved. Several reports are determined on the relationship involving both the ESG and financial performances, while others have found a catalytic relationship. Kim and Li [8] proposed that reports are determined on the relationship involving both the ESG and financial performances’ variables examined in this study. ESG categories, both strengths and issues, as well as aggregate ESG factors, have a direct influence on a company’s profitability and financial risk. Yuan et al. [9] reviewed that it is hypothesised that ESG disclosures have a moderating effect on financial irregularities at Chinese publicly traded companies, which is why this study empirically explores that hypothesis. The extent of ESG disclosure is measured by nonfinancial information disclosure rather than corporate social responsibility performance [10]. Chinese ESG investment is the focus of this study. A nonlinear link between ESG and portfolio excess returns is implied by the fact that portfolios with high and low levels of ESG score larger abnormal returns. ESG’s impact on stock returns differs depending on the pillar and sector being studied [11]. Tan et al. [12] and Shahabaz and Afzal [13] analyzed the ESG rating increases; the promotion impact becomes more obvious. ESG ratings and green innovation are more closely linked because of stronger environmental restrictions, more competition, and enterprises in their growth phase. It has been shown that ESG evaluations get a favorable effect on China’s green innovation and development efforts. Duque-Grisales and Aguilera-Caracuel [14] demonstrated that the financial performance (FP) of multinational firms in emerging nations is investigated to determine if it is connected to higher environmental, social, and governance scores [15]. There is a statistically significant link between an organization’s ESG score and its financial performance. Garcia et al. [16] suggested ESG performance is examined in industries with high social and environmental repercussions, such as those that are susceptible to widespread societal taboos, moral disputes, and political pressures. We used data from 365 publicly traded firms between 2010 and 2012 to conduct linear regressions. Our findings show that market capitalization is the most important factor in predicting ESG outcomes. Ahmad et al. [17] presented ESG (economic, environment, social, and corporate governance performance) has been reexamined in this study in relation to the financial performance of UK companies. FTSE350’s most current 351-firm sample from 2002 to 2018 is utilized. As a result of using both dynamic and static panel data approaches, the impact of ESG on a company’s financial performance may be analyzed [18]. According to the findings of this study, in China, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance has a favorable influence on proactive innovation depending on sustainable development, and it also shows how heterogeneity in ESG performance affects the impact of innovation under stakeholder theory [19]. Zhao et al. [20] used a panel regression to observe the relationship involving both the ESG and financial performances in China’s electric power market.


### 2.1. Problem Statement

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and financial results are intertwined in two distinct ways. CSR can be viewed as a resource, a method, or a tool that management can use to operate their organization in order to enhance financial performance by increasing revenues or reducing expenses. A company’s success may be driven by its employees’ productivity and loyalty. Furthermore, the CSR-CFP link is argued to contribute to reputational value even if the CSR activity itself does not deliver any tangible benefits, since it may enhance good opinions among stakeholder groups such as consumers, investors, and employees, or even obscure poor performance. ESG problems have been the subject of several academic and business studies, but little emphasis has been paid to their influence on corporate fixed income’s financial performance. For the most part, we will be focusing on things like corporate interest rate spreads and the possibility of a rating drop as well as default scenarios. Companies that conduct sustainable operations will be rewarded and those that do not will be penalised as a result of the spread of information about alpha-generating ESG initiatives. Reduce nonrenewable resources, improve renewable resource capacity, and reduce trash generation as a result of this process in the aggregate.


## 2.1. Problem Statement

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and financial results are intertwined in two distinct ways. CSR can be viewed as a resource, a method, or a tool that management can use to operate their organization in order to enhance financial performance by increasing revenues or reducing expenses. A company’s success may be driven by its employees’ productivity and loyalty. Furthermore, the CSR-CFP link is argued to contribute to reputational value even if the CSR activity itself does not deliver any tangible benefits, since it may enhance good opinions among stakeholder groups such as consumers, investors, and employees, or even obscure poor performance. ESG problems have been the subject of several academic and business studies, but little emphasis has been paid to their influence on corporate fixed income’s financial performance. For the most part, we will be focusing on things like corporate interest rate spreads and the possibility of a rating drop as well as default scenarios. Companies that conduct sustainable operations will be rewarded and those that do not will be penalised as a result of the spread of information about alpha-generating ESG initiatives. Reduce nonrenewable resources, improve renewable resource capacity, and reduce trash generation as a result of this process in the aggregate.


## 3. Proposed Work

This part explains the flow of the suggested methodology. The schematic representation of the suggested technique includes the processes like analyzing the financial datasets of companies, preprocessing forz-score normalization, hypothesis development, application of ESG, corporate financial performance evaluation, dynamic and static panel study, statistical analyses, Pearson correlation test, logistic regression model, Fisher’s exact test in analyses of effects of ESG on financial performance under the epidemic based on dynamic and static panel data Figure 1. The depiction of the overall work is indicated by Figure 2.Figure 1
Sample diagram for ESG on corporate performance.Figure 2
Complete flow of this research.


### 3.1. Dataset Description

The information was gleaned from yearly reports released by every bank, the Chinese Economic Statistics Handbook, the Chinese Central Bank, and the Wind database. Use of the “linear and nonlinear” and disaggregated technique for information inquiry is employed to better comprehend the corporate social performance (CSP) repercussions on bank performance (BP). Thirty Chinese corporate banks are included in this study’s yearly dataset, which began in 2008 [21].


### 3.2. Data Preprocessing

A method known as zero-mean normalization,z-score normalization employs the mean and standard deviation of each feature over a training dataset to normalize each input feature vectors. Mean and standard deviation are provided to each attribute. The formula for the transition may be found here:
(1)W′=w−μBσB,whereμB is mean of attribute B and σB is the standard deviation of attribute (correction). This generates data with zero mean and unit variance for each characteristic. In order to begin training, the z-score normalization process is applied to all feature vectors in a dataset. The averages and standard deviations for each feature across a training set must be kept and utilized as weight in the final system layout once they have been computed. Financial performance is preprocessed by this layer. Because it was educated on a different representation of the data than the unnormalized data, the financial model’s performance will be very variable otherwise. This z-score normalization has the advantage of reducing the impact of outliers in the dataset.


### 3.3. Hypothesis Development

Theoretical connections among corporate financial performance and corporate social responsibility originate from two directions. One model views CSR as a distinct resource or method or a tool for management to operate the company in order to increase revenues or cut expenses in order to enhance financial performance. Employees who are more productive and loyal may be the driving force behind improved financial success. Furthermore, it is suggested that the CSR–CFP link gives the image of doing “good,” even if the CSR activity itself provides no actual benefits which has reputational value in this context since it may increase good opinions among stakeholder groups like consumers, investors, and workers or even obscure bad performance, as stated.H0: a significant correlation exists between financial success and corporate social responsibility (CSR), even after accounting for a variety of factors like industry impacts, country-level effects, company size, financial risks, and insurance type.Hypothesis 1: ESG has a favorable effect on corporate profitability.Corporate governance’s influence on ESG components was the sole focus of this study. The study focused on the link between corporate governance and financial aspects such as enterprise value, profit margins and revenue streams, acquisitions of fixed assets, and mergers and acquisitions (M&A). Firms with a higher governance index value had greater firm value, higher earnings and sales growth, lower capital expenditures, and a fewer number of corporate acquisitions as compared to those with lower index values. Financial performance may be favorably influenced by the effectiveness of a company’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate governance programs, according to empirical studies. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is becoming increasingly important in the world of finance as consumers and investors become more aware of its importance. CSR activity has a direct positive influence on company performance across a wide range of industries. The following hypothesis was developed to better understand the influence of distinct ESG components:Hypothesis 2: as regards ESG aspects, governance is the most important category. Some argue that ESG characteristics can help explain financial risk, such as uncertainty and volatility; however, this is debatable. As an example, negative CSR events had a cumulative anomalous return, which indicated the negative influence on shareholder value. According to the study, the CSR element reduces the company’s risk and increases its value.Professional investment service companies do more research looking at the connection between ESG variables and financial risk. Many investors and credit rating agencies use ESG considerations in their credit risk analysis methodology, “United Nations Principle for Responsible Investment” (UNPRI). Nine credit rating agencies as well as more than 100 institutional investors believe that ESG elements should be considered when evaluating credit risk and credit ratings. According to the paper, Pacific Investment Management Corporation (PIMCO) is an example of a sovereign rating agency that incorporates environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors into its analysis. Companies’ creditworthiness can be explained in part by factors related to CSR, such as community ties, diversity, employee relations, and product features. Spreads on corporate bonds and performance in Eurozone countries are linked. The following hypothesis was formulated to investigate the link between ESG and financial risk.


### 3.4. Application of ESG

Environmental: carbon dioxide emissions and climate change, air and water pollution, biodiversity, deforestation, the use of less energy, management of waste, scarcity of water.Social: satisfaction for the customer, privacy and security of personal information, diversity and gender, employee satisfaction, human rights, community relations, and labour norms.Governance: board’s composition, including bribery, CEO salaries, lobbying, and donations to political parties.


### 3.5. Corporate Financial Performance Evaluation

Nonetheless, the corporate financial performance was measured using accounting and market measures as of December 31, 2005. The three-accounting metrics used are the Return on Average Equity (ROAE), Return on Average Asset (ROAA), and Cost-to-Income Ratio (CIR) (all acquired from Bank Scope). Cost/Income is a measure of efficiency, whereas ROAE and ROAA measure profitability. To approximate market performance, three market quantities were used: Valuation, Price to Book Value, and Price/Earnings Adjusted, which were created from the data stream.Corporate financial performance (CFP) definitions and metrics may be divided into three groups: (1) market-based, (2) accounting-based, and (3) perceptual CFP measures. Unlike CSR measurements, scholarly research on CFP has settled on the trichotomy of measures of CFP. Market-based CFP indicators, such as a price per shares or the rise in share price, place shareholders at the front of the priority list of stakeholders. Incorporation of extra market-based measures into their assessment method, such as market efficiency, market return, market price-to-book value, and many more. Accounting-based indicators, on the other hand, include measures of profitability, asset utilization, such as ROA or asset turnover, and growth. Accountancy-based indicators, such as the ROA, ROE, or EPS of the company (e.g., earnings), show the internal efficiency of the company in some way. Survey participants are also asked to provide subjective evaluations of the financial performance of organizations, such as their soundness of financial state or how well they are able to meet financial goals compared to their competitors. New perceptual CFP indicators like “scaling of financial performance,” as evaluated by survey respondents, are used in the reviewed research.Metrics based on accounting are objective and audited, but metrics based on the market are partially objective but primarily subjective and depending on the judgments of survey respondents. Tobin’sQ=totalassets’value/astock’sactualmarketvalue+preferredstock’scurrentmarketvalue+assetswithashort‐termvalidity–short−terminvestment+LTV (Long-Term Value) of Debt). In this approximation, the replacing cost of a company’s plants, properties, and equipment, as well as its inventories, is considered to be equal to the book value. Also, it implies that short-term and long-term debt’s market and book value are the same, although long-term debt’s book price is an approximation of its market price for short-term debt.


#### 3.5.1. Static and Dynamic Panel Study

Static and dynamic panel data approaches form the basis of our estimations. A key feature of panel data is that it can be used to examine both cross-sectional and time-series differences. An ESG-financial performance link is also estimated using a dynamic panel data technique. As an explanatory variable, a lagged dependent variable can be included, panel data analysis may be shown to have dynamic effects. How social performance affects a company’s overall financial success. To deal with serial correlation and endogeneity in an explanatory variable, a dynamic form of a static model is presented Table1. However, the introduction of a delayed dependent variables may cause standard estimators to be inconsistent.
(2)ROAit=αl+β1InTB+β2BI+β3HIit+β4KDit+β5RIit+β6KJit+β7LJit+β8KWit+μit,(3)ROEit=αl+β1InTB+β2BI+β3HIit+β4KDit+β5RIit+β6KJit+β7LJit+β8KWit+μit,where i indicates company and t indicates time. Static and dynamic panel data estimation techniques were used to estimate the two equations in this study. We did diagnostic tests and recognised that the panels exhibit heteroscedasticity. Therefore, we developed robust estimates for both equations (2) and (3), employing three static panel analysis methods: fixed effect, random effects, and pooled OLS. A pooled mean group (PMG) approach was used to investigate the dynamic link between the firm’s attributes and the profitability-estimating equations (2) and (3). The impetus for utilizing the PMG was that, although static guesses create an average impact, the PMG may separate out long term and estimates. Because it is a dynamic panel data estimate approach, the PMG fits within an ARDL framework, which is particularly well suited to mixed-stationary panel data that can investigate the short-term as well as long-term dynamics of the relationship.
(4)∆Zl,h=φiZl,h−1+alYl,h−1+∑c=1r−1θl,h∆Zl,h−1+∑c=0r−1δlYl,h−1+ωl+μl,h,where Y is a set of explanatory variables in the form of a vector, al represents the long-term elasticities, and φi is the error correction term, while the coefficients of short-term dynamics are denoted by al and θl.Table 1
Instruments for describing and measuring variables.
S. no.VariablesMeasurementSignDependent variable1Return on investmentNet profile/total investmentROA2Profit on the annual surplus nominal interest marginMarket base performancesNIMPIndependent variable3ESG transparency scoreThe environmental composite score, governance, and social aspectsESG4Social scoresScore for environmental transparencySOCControl variable5ESG disclosure score from the previous yearEnvironmental, social, and governance composite score from the previous yearESG1−16Environment score from the previous yearEnvironmental disclosure score from the previous yearENV1−17Governance score from the previous year is an interacting variableScore from the previous year’s governance disclosureGOV1−1


### 3.6. Statistical Analysis

Data collection, organization, analysis, interpretation, and presentation are all part of the field of statistics, which is the study of numbers and their relationships. A statistical population or a statistical technique is typically the first step in solving a scientific, industrial or social issue with statistics. “All the inhabitants in a country” or “each atom in a crystal” is an example of different populations. Statistics is concerned with every facet of data, from the conception of surveys and experiments to the actual data gathering itself.


#### 3.6.1. Pearson Correlation Test

When it comes to analyzing correlation between variables, Pearson’s correlation tests are one of the most commonly used methods. In order to determine the strength of a connection between two vectors, it makes use of the data’s covariance matrix. When two vectorsαl and αn are compared using Pearson’s correlation coefficient, it is usually
(5)Rαl,αn=covαl,αnVarαl×Varαn,where cov(αl,αn) is the covariance, var(αl) is the variance of αl, and var(αn) is the variance of αj.A sample or the entire population can be subjected to Pearson’s correlation test. The sample’s and the population’s Pearson’s correlation tests are both less than or equal to 1. For a sample correlation, the correlation coefficient is 1, whereas for a population correlation, it is -1 cor136, since the data points are either precisely on a line or have a bivariate distribution supported by a straight line. The correlation coefficient of Pearson is symmetric:(6)Rαl,αn=Rαn,αl.Equation (6) can be used to express the Pearson correlation.
(7)j=∑l=1mylzl/m−Y^∗Z^Ay∗Az,where the Pearson correlation coefficient is denoted by the letter r and Y^ and Z^ denote the average of y and z, while Ay and Az represent the standard deviation of y and z and are obtained by
(8)Ay=∑m=1my2m−Y∧2,(9)Az=∑m=1mZ2m−Z∧2.The Pearson correlation test indicates a linear connection among 2 variables and displays the confidence range where the result is significant. It has a range of 1 to +1, with values closer to 1 and +1 indicating a significant association. A positive correlation coefficient also means that a rise in one indicator will lead to an increase in another and conversely.


#### 3.6.2. Logistic Regression Model

This model was used to examine the current ratio, operational cash flows, and the inflation rate’s likelihood of causing financial trouble for the firm. As long as the company has had two or more years of negative net income, it is considered to be in financial distress, as measured by an index of 0 in this model. When a company does not encounter financial difficulties, i.e., two consecutive years of positive net income, the value of 1 (one) is applied. So, because the dependent variable in our study is an indicator of financial strain, we will use a logistic regression model. Logistic regression may be summarized in this way:(10)Kl=ImRl1−Rl=Vl=β1+β1Yl.Analyze study variables using model estimation:(11)Km=R1−r=β0+β1Y1it+β2Y2it+⋯+βmYmit,whereR/1−r is the chance of a corporation encountering financial difficulties, β0 is constant, βm is the independent variable regression coefficients, Ym is the independent variable, i is entity to –I, and t is period to –t.
(12)Km=R1−r=β0+β1CRit+β2OCFit+INFit+∈it,whereKmR/1−r is the chance of a corporation encountering financial difficulties, β0 is constant, CR is the current ratio, and OCF is the net operational cash flow changes.


#### 3.6.3. Fisher’s Exact Test

In order to determine whether or not two categorical variables are significant association, Fisher’s exact tests are employed. This test can be used instead of a chi-squaret-test when the cell counts in a 2×2 table are fewer than 5.Null and alternative hypotheses in Fisher’s exact test are as follows:H0: (null hypothesis) the two variables are not interrelated.H1: (alternative hypothesis) the two variables are related.Fisher demonstrated thatj+k pulls from a population with j+s successes and k+r failures are distributed as a hypergeometric distribution with a+c draws from the margins of the table. According to the following formula, the likelihood of receiving these values:
(13)Q=j+s/jk+r/km/j+k=j+s/jk+r/rm/s+r,(14)Q=j+s!k+r!j+k!s+r!j!s!k!r!m!,where the population size ism, population “successes” are j+s, sample size is j+k, and sample “successes” are j.


## 3.1. Dataset Description

The information was gleaned from yearly reports released by every bank, the Chinese Economic Statistics Handbook, the Chinese Central Bank, and the Wind database. Use of the “linear and nonlinear” and disaggregated technique for information inquiry is employed to better comprehend the corporate social performance (CSP) repercussions on bank performance (BP). Thirty Chinese corporate banks are included in this study’s yearly dataset, which began in 2008 [21].


## 3.2. Data Preprocessing

A method known as zero-mean normalization,z-score normalization employs the mean and standard deviation of each feature over a training dataset to normalize each input feature vectors. Mean and standard deviation are provided to each attribute. The formula for the transition may be found here:
(1)W′=w−μBσB,whereμB is mean of attribute B and σB is the standard deviation of attribute (correction). This generates data with zero mean and unit variance for each characteristic. In order to begin training, the z-score normalization process is applied to all feature vectors in a dataset. The averages and standard deviations for each feature across a training set must be kept and utilized as weight in the final system layout once they have been computed. Financial performance is preprocessed by this layer. Because it was educated on a different representation of the data than the unnormalized data, the financial model’s performance will be very variable otherwise. This z-score normalization has the advantage of reducing the impact of outliers in the dataset.


## 3.3. Hypothesis Development

Theoretical connections among corporate financial performance and corporate social responsibility originate from two directions. One model views CSR as a distinct resource or method or a tool for management to operate the company in order to increase revenues or cut expenses in order to enhance financial performance. Employees who are more productive and loyal may be the driving force behind improved financial success. Furthermore, it is suggested that the CSR–CFP link gives the image of doing “good,” even if the CSR activity itself provides no actual benefits which has reputational value in this context since it may increase good opinions among stakeholder groups like consumers, investors, and workers or even obscure bad performance, as stated.H0: a significant correlation exists between financial success and corporate social responsibility (CSR), even after accounting for a variety of factors like industry impacts, country-level effects, company size, financial risks, and insurance type.Hypothesis 1: ESG has a favorable effect on corporate profitability.Corporate governance’s influence on ESG components was the sole focus of this study. The study focused on the link between corporate governance and financial aspects such as enterprise value, profit margins and revenue streams, acquisitions of fixed assets, and mergers and acquisitions (M&A). Firms with a higher governance index value had greater firm value, higher earnings and sales growth, lower capital expenditures, and a fewer number of corporate acquisitions as compared to those with lower index values. Financial performance may be favorably influenced by the effectiveness of a company’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate governance programs, according to empirical studies. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is becoming increasingly important in the world of finance as consumers and investors become more aware of its importance. CSR activity has a direct positive influence on company performance across a wide range of industries. The following hypothesis was developed to better understand the influence of distinct ESG components:Hypothesis 2: as regards ESG aspects, governance is the most important category. Some argue that ESG characteristics can help explain financial risk, such as uncertainty and volatility; however, this is debatable. As an example, negative CSR events had a cumulative anomalous return, which indicated the negative influence on shareholder value. According to the study, the CSR element reduces the company’s risk and increases its value.Professional investment service companies do more research looking at the connection between ESG variables and financial risk. Many investors and credit rating agencies use ESG considerations in their credit risk analysis methodology, “United Nations Principle for Responsible Investment” (UNPRI). Nine credit rating agencies as well as more than 100 institutional investors believe that ESG elements should be considered when evaluating credit risk and credit ratings. According to the paper, Pacific Investment Management Corporation (PIMCO) is an example of a sovereign rating agency that incorporates environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors into its analysis. Companies’ creditworthiness can be explained in part by factors related to CSR, such as community ties, diversity, employee relations, and product features. Spreads on corporate bonds and performance in Eurozone countries are linked. The following hypothesis was formulated to investigate the link between ESG and financial risk.


## 3.4. Application of ESG

Environmental: carbon dioxide emissions and climate change, air and water pollution, biodiversity, deforestation, the use of less energy, management of waste, scarcity of water.Social: satisfaction for the customer, privacy and security of personal information, diversity and gender, employee satisfaction, human rights, community relations, and labour norms.Governance: board’s composition, including bribery, CEO salaries, lobbying, and donations to political parties.


## 3.5. Corporate Financial Performance Evaluation

Nonetheless, the corporate financial performance was measured using accounting and market measures as of December 31, 2005. The three-accounting metrics used are the Return on Average Equity (ROAE), Return on Average Asset (ROAA), and Cost-to-Income Ratio (CIR) (all acquired from Bank Scope). Cost/Income is a measure of efficiency, whereas ROAE and ROAA measure profitability. To approximate market performance, three market quantities were used: Valuation, Price to Book Value, and Price/Earnings Adjusted, which were created from the data stream.Corporate financial performance (CFP) definitions and metrics may be divided into three groups: (1) market-based, (2) accounting-based, and (3) perceptual CFP measures. Unlike CSR measurements, scholarly research on CFP has settled on the trichotomy of measures of CFP. Market-based CFP indicators, such as a price per shares or the rise in share price, place shareholders at the front of the priority list of stakeholders. Incorporation of extra market-based measures into their assessment method, such as market efficiency, market return, market price-to-book value, and many more. Accounting-based indicators, on the other hand, include measures of profitability, asset utilization, such as ROA or asset turnover, and growth. Accountancy-based indicators, such as the ROA, ROE, or EPS of the company (e.g., earnings), show the internal efficiency of the company in some way. Survey participants are also asked to provide subjective evaluations of the financial performance of organizations, such as their soundness of financial state or how well they are able to meet financial goals compared to their competitors. New perceptual CFP indicators like “scaling of financial performance,” as evaluated by survey respondents, are used in the reviewed research.Metrics based on accounting are objective and audited, but metrics based on the market are partially objective but primarily subjective and depending on the judgments of survey respondents. Tobin’sQ=totalassets’value/astock’sactualmarketvalue+preferredstock’scurrentmarketvalue+assetswithashort‐termvalidity–short−terminvestment+LTV (Long-Term Value) of Debt). In this approximation, the replacing cost of a company’s plants, properties, and equipment, as well as its inventories, is considered to be equal to the book value. Also, it implies that short-term and long-term debt’s market and book value are the same, although long-term debt’s book price is an approximation of its market price for short-term debt.


### 3.5.1. Static and Dynamic Panel Study

Static and dynamic panel data approaches form the basis of our estimations. A key feature of panel data is that it can be used to examine both cross-sectional and time-series differences. An ESG-financial performance link is also estimated using a dynamic panel data technique. As an explanatory variable, a lagged dependent variable can be included, panel data analysis may be shown to have dynamic effects. How social performance affects a company’s overall financial success. To deal with serial correlation and endogeneity in an explanatory variable, a dynamic form of a static model is presented Table1. However, the introduction of a delayed dependent variables may cause standard estimators to be inconsistent.
(2)ROAit=αl+β1InTB+β2BI+β3HIit+β4KDit+β5RIit+β6KJit+β7LJit+β8KWit+μit,(3)ROEit=αl+β1InTB+β2BI+β3HIit+β4KDit+β5RIit+β6KJit+β7LJit+β8KWit+μit,where i indicates company and t indicates time. Static and dynamic panel data estimation techniques were used to estimate the two equations in this study. We did diagnostic tests and recognised that the panels exhibit heteroscedasticity. Therefore, we developed robust estimates for both equations (2) and (3), employing three static panel analysis methods: fixed effect, random effects, and pooled OLS. A pooled mean group (PMG) approach was used to investigate the dynamic link between the firm’s attributes and the profitability-estimating equations (2) and (3). The impetus for utilizing the PMG was that, although static guesses create an average impact, the PMG may separate out long term and estimates. Because it is a dynamic panel data estimate approach, the PMG fits within an ARDL framework, which is particularly well suited to mixed-stationary panel data that can investigate the short-term as well as long-term dynamics of the relationship.
(4)∆Zl,h=φiZl,h−1+alYl,h−1+∑c=1r−1θl,h∆Zl,h−1+∑c=0r−1δlYl,h−1+ωl+μl,h,where Y is a set of explanatory variables in the form of a vector, al represents the long-term elasticities, and φi is the error correction term, while the coefficients of short-term dynamics are denoted by al and θl.Table 1
Instruments for describing and measuring variables.
S. no.VariablesMeasurementSignDependent variable1Return on investmentNet profile/total investmentROA2Profit on the annual surplus nominal interest marginMarket base performancesNIMPIndependent variable3ESG transparency scoreThe environmental composite score, governance, and social aspectsESG4Social scoresScore for environmental transparencySOCControl variable5ESG disclosure score from the previous yearEnvironmental, social, and governance composite score from the previous yearESG1−16Environment score from the previous yearEnvironmental disclosure score from the previous yearENV1−17Governance score from the previous year is an interacting variableScore from the previous year’s governance disclosureGOV1−1


## 3.5.1. Static and Dynamic Panel Study

Static and dynamic panel data approaches form the basis of our estimations. A key feature of panel data is that it can be used to examine both cross-sectional and time-series differences. An ESG-financial performance link is also estimated using a dynamic panel data technique. As an explanatory variable, a lagged dependent variable can be included, panel data analysis may be shown to have dynamic effects. How social performance affects a company’s overall financial success. To deal with serial correlation and endogeneity in an explanatory variable, a dynamic form of a static model is presented Table1. However, the introduction of a delayed dependent variables may cause standard estimators to be inconsistent.
(2)ROAit=αl+β1InTB+β2BI+β3HIit+β4KDit+β5RIit+β6KJit+β7LJit+β8KWit+μit,(3)ROEit=αl+β1InTB+β2BI+β3HIit+β4KDit+β5RIit+β6KJit+β7LJit+β8KWit+μit,where i indicates company and t indicates time. Static and dynamic panel data estimation techniques were used to estimate the two equations in this study. We did diagnostic tests and recognised that the panels exhibit heteroscedasticity. Therefore, we developed robust estimates for both equations (2) and (3), employing three static panel analysis methods: fixed effect, random effects, and pooled OLS. A pooled mean group (PMG) approach was used to investigate the dynamic link between the firm’s attributes and the profitability-estimating equations (2) and (3). The impetus for utilizing the PMG was that, although static guesses create an average impact, the PMG may separate out long term and estimates. Because it is a dynamic panel data estimate approach, the PMG fits within an ARDL framework, which is particularly well suited to mixed-stationary panel data that can investigate the short-term as well as long-term dynamics of the relationship.
(4)∆Zl,h=φiZl,h−1+alYl,h−1+∑c=1r−1θl,h∆Zl,h−1+∑c=0r−1δlYl,h−1+ωl+μl,h,where Y is a set of explanatory variables in the form of a vector, al represents the long-term elasticities, and φi is the error correction term, while the coefficients of short-term dynamics are denoted by al and θl.Table 1
Instruments for describing and measuring variables.
S. no.VariablesMeasurementSignDependent variable1Return on investmentNet profile/total investmentROA2Profit on the annual surplus nominal interest marginMarket base performancesNIMPIndependent variable3ESG transparency scoreThe environmental composite score, governance, and social aspectsESG4Social scoresScore for environmental transparencySOCControl variable5ESG disclosure score from the previous yearEnvironmental, social, and governance composite score from the previous yearESG1−16Environment score from the previous yearEnvironmental disclosure score from the previous yearENV1−17Governance score from the previous year is an interacting variableScore from the previous year’s governance disclosureGOV1−1


## 3.6. Statistical Analysis

Data collection, organization, analysis, interpretation, and presentation are all part of the field of statistics, which is the study of numbers and their relationships. A statistical population or a statistical technique is typically the first step in solving a scientific, industrial or social issue with statistics. “All the inhabitants in a country” or “each atom in a crystal” is an example of different populations. Statistics is concerned with every facet of data, from the conception of surveys and experiments to the actual data gathering itself.


### 3.6.1. Pearson Correlation Test

When it comes to analyzing correlation between variables, Pearson’s correlation tests are one of the most commonly used methods. In order to determine the strength of a connection between two vectors, it makes use of the data’s covariance matrix. When two vectorsαl and αn are compared using Pearson’s correlation coefficient, it is usually
(5)Rαl,αn=covαl,αnVarαl×Varαn,where cov(αl,αn) is the covariance, var(αl) is the variance of αl, and var(αn) is the variance of αj.A sample or the entire population can be subjected to Pearson’s correlation test. The sample’s and the population’s Pearson’s correlation tests are both less than or equal to 1. For a sample correlation, the correlation coefficient is 1, whereas for a population correlation, it is -1 cor136, since the data points are either precisely on a line or have a bivariate distribution supported by a straight line. The correlation coefficient of Pearson is symmetric:(6)Rαl,αn=Rαn,αl.Equation (6) can be used to express the Pearson correlation.
(7)j=∑l=1mylzl/m−Y^∗Z^Ay∗Az,where the Pearson correlation coefficient is denoted by the letter r and Y^ and Z^ denote the average of y and z, while Ay and Az represent the standard deviation of y and z and are obtained by
(8)Ay=∑m=1my2m−Y∧2,(9)Az=∑m=1mZ2m−Z∧2.The Pearson correlation test indicates a linear connection among 2 variables and displays the confidence range where the result is significant. It has a range of 1 to +1, with values closer to 1 and +1 indicating a significant association. A positive correlation coefficient also means that a rise in one indicator will lead to an increase in another and conversely.


### 3.6.2. Logistic Regression Model

This model was used to examine the current ratio, operational cash flows, and the inflation rate’s likelihood of causing financial trouble for the firm. As long as the company has had two or more years of negative net income, it is considered to be in financial distress, as measured by an index of 0 in this model. When a company does not encounter financial difficulties, i.e., two consecutive years of positive net income, the value of 1 (one) is applied. So, because the dependent variable in our study is an indicator of financial strain, we will use a logistic regression model. Logistic regression may be summarized in this way:(10)Kl=ImRl1−Rl=Vl=β1+β1Yl.Analyze study variables using model estimation:(11)Km=R1−r=β0+β1Y1it+β2Y2it+⋯+βmYmit,whereR/1−r is the chance of a corporation encountering financial difficulties, β0 is constant, βm is the independent variable regression coefficients, Ym is the independent variable, i is entity to –I, and t is period to –t.
(12)Km=R1−r=β0+β1CRit+β2OCFit+INFit+∈it,whereKmR/1−r is the chance of a corporation encountering financial difficulties, β0 is constant, CR is the current ratio, and OCF is the net operational cash flow changes.


### 3.6.3. Fisher’s Exact Test

In order to determine whether or not two categorical variables are significant association, Fisher’s exact tests are employed. This test can be used instead of a chi-squaret-test when the cell counts in a 2×2 table are fewer than 5.Null and alternative hypotheses in Fisher’s exact test are as follows:H0: (null hypothesis) the two variables are not interrelated.H1: (alternative hypothesis) the two variables are related.Fisher demonstrated thatj+k pulls from a population with j+s successes and k+r failures are distributed as a hypergeometric distribution with a+c draws from the margins of the table. According to the following formula, the likelihood of receiving these values:
(13)Q=j+s/jk+r/km/j+k=j+s/jk+r/rm/s+r,(14)Q=j+s!k+r!j+k!s+r!j!s!k!r!m!,where the population size ism, population “successes” are j+s, sample size is j+k, and sample “successes” are j.


## 3.6.1. Pearson Correlation Test

When it comes to analyzing correlation between variables, Pearson’s correlation tests are one of the most commonly used methods. In order to determine the strength of a connection between two vectors, it makes use of the data’s covariance matrix. When two vectorsαl and αn are compared using Pearson’s correlation coefficient, it is usually
(5)Rαl,αn=covαl,αnVarαl×Varαn,where cov(αl,αn) is the covariance, var(αl) is the variance of αl, and var(αn) is the variance of αj.A sample or the entire population can be subjected to Pearson’s correlation test. The sample’s and the population’s Pearson’s correlation tests are both less than or equal to 1. For a sample correlation, the correlation coefficient is 1, whereas for a population correlation, it is -1 cor136, since the data points are either precisely on a line or have a bivariate distribution supported by a straight line. The correlation coefficient of Pearson is symmetric:(6)Rαl,αn=Rαn,αl.Equation (6) can be used to express the Pearson correlation.
(7)j=∑l=1mylzl/m−Y^∗Z^Ay∗Az,where the Pearson correlation coefficient is denoted by the letter r and Y^ and Z^ denote the average of y and z, while Ay and Az represent the standard deviation of y and z and are obtained by
(8)Ay=∑m=1my2m−Y∧2,(9)Az=∑m=1mZ2m−Z∧2.The Pearson correlation test indicates a linear connection among 2 variables and displays the confidence range where the result is significant. It has a range of 1 to +1, with values closer to 1 and +1 indicating a significant association. A positive correlation coefficient also means that a rise in one indicator will lead to an increase in another and conversely.


## 3.6.2. Logistic Regression Model

This model was used to examine the current ratio, operational cash flows, and the inflation rate’s likelihood of causing financial trouble for the firm. As long as the company has had two or more years of negative net income, it is considered to be in financial distress, as measured by an index of 0 in this model. When a company does not encounter financial difficulties, i.e., two consecutive years of positive net income, the value of 1 (one) is applied. So, because the dependent variable in our study is an indicator of financial strain, we will use a logistic regression model. Logistic regression may be summarized in this way:(10)Kl=ImRl1−Rl=Vl=β1+β1Yl.Analyze study variables using model estimation:(11)Km=R1−r=β0+β1Y1it+β2Y2it+⋯+βmYmit,whereR/1−r is the chance of a corporation encountering financial difficulties, β0 is constant, βm is the independent variable regression coefficients, Ym is the independent variable, i is entity to –I, and t is period to –t.
(12)Km=R1−r=β0+β1CRit+β2OCFit+INFit+∈it,whereKmR/1−r is the chance of a corporation encountering financial difficulties, β0 is constant, CR is the current ratio, and OCF is the net operational cash flow changes.


## 3.6.3. Fisher’s Exact Test

In order to determine whether or not two categorical variables are significant association, Fisher’s exact tests are employed. This test can be used instead of a chi-squaret-test when the cell counts in a 2×2 table are fewer than 5.Null and alternative hypotheses in Fisher’s exact test are as follows:H0: (null hypothesis) the two variables are not interrelated.H1: (alternative hypothesis) the two variables are related.Fisher demonstrated thatj+k pulls from a population with j+s successes and k+r failures are distributed as a hypergeometric distribution with a+c draws from the margins of the table. According to the following formula, the likelihood of receiving these values:
(13)Q=j+s/jk+r/km/j+k=j+s/jk+r/rm/s+r,(14)Q=j+s!k+r!j+k!s+r!j!s!k!r!m!,where the population size ism, population “successes” are j+s, sample size is j+k, and sample “successes” are j.


## 4. Performance Analysis

This section provides an overview on the framework’s overall performance. The MATLAB/Simulink application is used to test the proposed study’s validity.According to models 1, 2, and 3, a company’s financial success may be affected by its ESG performance. Using Table2, we can see that ESG have a statistically significant influence on the company’s market value and earnings per share. Economic, environment, social, and corporate governance performance is shown to have a positive association with a company’s market value and earnings per share. However, the market value is not significantly affected by environmental and corporate governance performances. A firm’s earnings per share can be influenced by three factors: environmental, social, and corporate governance performance. This is not a big deal in terms of economic performance. Model 3 focuses on both high and low performers in the ESG. When it comes to market value and earnings per share, organizations with high ESG ratings do better than those with lower ratings. The LTA is a measure of the total assets of the firm that is used as a proxy for corporate size. LDA is the log of debt to assess ratio. As a measure of financial leverage, LDA is related to logarithm of debt to assets. The log of revenues is represented by LREV. Net sales represent gross sales, allowances, revenue less discounts, returns, and other operating revenue. The effective tax rate is denoted by ETR. In other words, it is calculated by dividing income taxes by income before taxes and expressing the result as a percentage.Table 2
Static examination of the effect of ESG on financial performance.
Model 1Model 2Model 3LMVLEPSLMVLEPSLMVLEPSLTA0.378∗∗∗ (30.28)0.310∗∗∗ (6.21)0.397∗∗∗ (13.90)0.321∗∗∗ (6.14)0.494∗∗∗ (23.20)0.245∗∗∗ (7.68)LREV0.234∗∗∗ (21.30)0.345∗∗∗ (5.34)0.299∗∗∗ (11.89)0.334∗∗∗ (9.00)0.456∗∗∗ (13.45)0.234∗∗∗ (7.34)LDA-0.123∗∗∗ (-5.67)-0.456∗∗∗ (-1.24)-0.346∗∗∗ (-7.35)-0.155∗∗∗ (-4.37)-0.156∗∗∗ (-9.12)-0.234∗∗∗ (-7.56)ETR-0.045∗∗ (-1.88)-0.245∗∗ (-4.78)-0.056∗∗ (-7.28)-0.012∗∗ (-1.05)-0.056∗∗ (-2.09)-0.678∗∗ (2.67)Table3 and Figure 3 show that an organization’s market value and profits per share are strongly influenced by its ESG performance.Table 3
On the financial impact of ESG factors: a dynamic study.
Model 1Model 2Model 3LEPSLMVLEPSLMVLEPSLMVLTA0.245∗∗∗ (20.40)0.201∗∗∗ (7.21)0.457∗∗∗ (12.60)0.345∗∗∗ (9.12)0.501∗∗∗ (17.12)0.459∗∗∗ (2.89)LREV0.289∗∗∗ (30.10)0.670∗∗∗ (9.38)0.287∗∗∗ (17.29)0.640∗∗∗ (2.01)0.245∗∗∗ (19.23)0.405∗∗∗ (9.26)LDA-0.246∗∗∗ (-4.97)-0.298∗∗∗ (-5.80)-0.289∗∗∗ (-6.45)-0.210∗∗∗ (-4.73)-0.267∗∗∗ (-8.20)-0.308∗∗∗ (-2.67)ETR-0.890∗∗ (-2.28)-0.789∗∗ (-1.30)-0.045∗∗ (-8.08)-0.020∗∗ (-2.78)-0.076∗∗ (-2.60)-0.290∗∗ (-2.67)Figure 3
Financial impact of ESG factors.The stock price and earnings of a firm are positively affected by each of the 3 ESG factors. When it comes to financial results, environmental performance has a marginally negative effect that cannot be quantified statistically; it has no effect. Economic success has a positive and major influence on the market, according to the positive meaningful effect of the various variables.In the sample period, the trend analysis of CSP scores in Figure4 demonstrates a consistently growing tendency for ESG and S scores, while E and G scores remain stationary around their mean levels. This shows that while Chinese corporations are increasing their social components of sustainability, the environmental and governance elements are not changing that dramatically.Figure 4
Descriptive analyses and correlation.Assessing discrepancies and media intensity helps establish which is more important: disclosure or action. Look for any discrepancies between the two indices’ relationships to financial success. At timet, the discrepancy of company I is defined.
(15)Discrepancyit=Actionit−Mediait.There are two types of ESG scores: one for media disclosure isMediait and one for actions is Actionit. Discrepancyit is increasing. Depending on the situation, this might either entail more action or a decrease in media coverage. Firm I’s media intensity at time t is calculated as follows to see how these two indicators interact with its financial success:
(16)MediaIntensityit=ActionitMediait.Even if media exposure is inversely related to profitability in all circumstances, the degree of the association is much less for theG rating than for other scores. Prior to 2018, Tobin’s Q had a positive connection with the E score, but a negatively correlated with the S score following 2018. IVA scores show a negative correlation with E score, while S and G scores have a positive correlation.Media intensity and profitability were negatively correlated in all cases, although the magnitude is far lower for theG score than for the other scores. When it comes to Tobin’s Q, the amount of media coverage correlates favorably with the E and G scores after 2018, the S score before 2018, and the G score after 2018, while the S score after 2018 shows a negative link. More important for financial performance is increasing the weight of action in comparison to media or decreasing the disparity between IVA scores and E scores (which are adversely associated while favorably related to S and G scores). Because disparity and media intensity coefficients are comparable, the findings suggest that reducing actions or increasing media disclosure will have a beneficial influence on financial earnings. Some Tobin’s Q and IVA ratings are positively correlated with increasing ESG score discrepancy and media depths, whereas other ESG scores are negatively correlated with these ratings.Figure5 represents the economic growth with proposed and existing approaches. In the first stage of the relationship between economic growth and steel production, the results of the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) approach show a strong correlation. Moreover, in the LSTM model, authors demonstrated that the principle of sustainable development relates to the reduction of polluting emissions. Particularly, this phenomenon pertains to the economic growth model that will lead to the next generation [22]. Bunyamin [23] analyzed key economic indicators in order to determine the growth of the economy. The research utilized a variety of time series analysis techniques, including classic time series analysis, machine learning, and deep learning to answer these questions. By using Root-Mean-Square Error, they found that Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Average (SARIMA) and Convolutional LSTM give the most accurate results for classical and deep learning techniques. In addition, their analysis revealed that SARIMA’s performance is enhanced by its ability to capture seasonality and trend in the data. As on either convolutional or LSTM networks, the performance of convolutional LSTM units markedly improved when convolutions were incorporated into the reading input to LSTM units. A new hybrid algorithm is presented for predicting economic growth using indicators of knowledge-based economies (KBEs) [24]. Based on these results, economic growth between forecast periods can be estimated. Based on these results, economic growth between forecast periods can be estimated. In multivariate forecasting, the results prove the effectiveness of the algorithm. Figure 6 shows that the proposed method of environmental social governance (ESG) has high economic growth, when compared to the existing methods such as machine learning, deep learning, and artificial intelligence.Figure 5
Economic growth of proposed and existing methodology.Figure 6
ESG scores’ trend.
(a)
Media disclosure score(b)
Action score


## 5. Discussion

Investors, firm managers, and other stakeholders have recently been paying attention to ESG performance due to its well-known and increasing importance as a means to increase a company’s value. Investors and society benefit from ESG data. Most investors purchase supplementary shares based on ESG-related data, and ESG investing is much like fundamental investing. In ESG, a firm’s performance on economics, the environment, social issues, and corporate governance is integrated. An investor’s ultimate goal is to earn a profit that has a positive impact on the environment and community. Firms are giving more attention to educating the public about environmental, social, and governance issues. Studies that examine the link among the factors like social and environmental and corporate performance tend to ignore the role of corporate governance. Studies have examined the link between ESG and corporate performance, focusing on the environmental and social impact of the organization. As a way of creating value, companies adopt corporate social responsibility. From this perspective, companies can achieve social responsibility through profitability, since they are able to provide returns to investors, match employee needs and commitments, and deliver quality products and services to consumers.For the short term to be successful financially, we found media disclosure to be crucial, but action is much more critical. These findings also suggest that releasing reports and exposing information, rather than measures that may take time and money, would be a preferable strategy for increasing short-term earnings. In contrast, if a corporation wanted to concentrate on lengthy profits, then pro-ESG efforts would reduce risks and increase profitability. To build an optimal financial plan, organizations must manage their financial portfolios and provide information in a balanced manner. For examples, if a corporation prioritizes profits above Tobin’sQ, this may overlook the E score’s actions in favor of openness. In order to increase financial performance, organizations can strengthen both transparency and action, while maintaining a proper balance between the two. Figure 6 represents the comparison of economic growth for existing methods and proposed method. In terms of economic growth, the proposed method of ESG has 88%, and the existing method of machine learning has 57%, deep learning has 68%, and artificial intelligence has 77%, so the suggested methodologies outperform the existing methodologies in economic growth. Investors looking to select investments that meet socially responsible standards use ESG criteria. Environmental criteria take into account a company’s climate variability initiatives in additional to how well it preserves the environment. The social criteria measure how the company manages relationships with employees, vendors, customers, and local communities. Audits, internal controls, and shareholder rights essentially fall underneath the overarching term of administration.


## 6. Conclusion

Stakeholders such as investors, managers, and others place a high value on an organization’s ESG performance, a company’s performance in terms of economics, the environment, society, and corporate governance. The research examines the financial effects of organizations’ high and low ESG performance. In both dynamic and static results, overall ESG had a positive effect on the price and profitability per share of firms. A company’s financial success benefits from its employees’ ESG features as well. However, when it comes to particular ESG dimensions and their influence on a company’s financial success, the results are equivocal. High-ESG and low-ESG companies have different financial outcomes. Due to the study’s dynamic and static data, comprehensive ESG has a considerable influence on corporate value and profitability per share. The impact of ESG variables on the financial performance of the company in the event of a pandemic was analyzed using analytical methods such as Pearson correlation, logistic regression, and Fisher’s exact test. Performance in ESG may boost financial performance, which could impact investors, business administrators, decision-makers, and industry regulations.



---

*Source: 6851518-2022-09-01.xml*