# Occurrence of Fungi and Mycotoxins in Fish Feeds and Their Impact on Fish Health

Authors: Esther Marijani; Emmanuel Kigadye; Sheila Okoth
Journal: International Journal of Microbiology
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

The rapid population growth in developing countries has led to strong pressure on capture fisheries. However, capture fisheries have reached their maximal limits of fish production and are supplemented by farmed fish. The growth in aquaculture has led to high demand for fish feeds, which play a very important role in fish nutrition and health. Use of animal protein in fish feeds is expensive; hence, a majority of farmers from developing countries use local feed ingredients from plant origin as a source of dietary protein. However, these ingredients of plant origin provide the best natural substrates for fungi, which can be easily accompanied by mycotoxin development under suitable conditions. The locally made feed comprises ingredients such as soybeans, cottonseed cake, and wheat and maize bran which are mixed together and ground after which the compounded feed is pelleted and stored. Among the ingredients, maize and oilseeds are more susceptible for mycotoxigenic fungi compared to other ingredients. The outcomes of mycotoxin contamination in fish feeds are not different from other animal species intended for human consumption, and they are directly associated with production losses, particularly decreased weight gain and feed conversion, impaired immune system and reproductive performance, and increased fish mortality. Fish may also carry mycotoxin residues along the food chain, thus compromising human health. Hence, it is important to ensure the control of mycotoxin contamination in fish feeds, especially during the production and storage.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Fish production in 2012 surpassed 158 million metric tons, whilst the value of international fish trade added up to USD 129 billion [1]. Aquaculture is the world’s fastest growing food production sector for more than four decades, whereas an increasingly large share of fish entering the global markets is derived from aquaculture [2]. Aquaculture production in Africa significantly increased from 646,182 to 1,710,910 million metric tons; as a matter of fact, fish and shrimp production in Africa has already grown by approximately 400% [3]. This rapid increase has been due to a decline in fish production from capture systems and increased awareness of the nutritional importance of fish [4]. With the rapid growth in aquaculture, demand for fish feeds is expected to continue increasing proportionately [5].Fish feed is an essential part of the aquaculture industry and comprises 40–50% of the total production cost in intensive culture systems [6]. It also has an important contribution to the production of fish feed since it tends to affect the quality of eggs [7]. A majority of fish farmers in developing countries use locally made fish feeds or commercially imported feeds for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) production. The imported fish feed is more expensive than the locally made ones. Hence, many fish farmers use locally made fish feed usually produced and stored in large quantities in order to reduce production costs and increase profit margins [8]. The locally made feeds are usually from locally available plant and animal wastes like rice, maize and wheat bran, blood meal, cottonseed cake and sunflower seedcakes, and soybeans and cassava [9]. These ingredients can be ground manually and mixed in a hand-operated mixer and then made into pellets using a pelleting machine. Such ingredients are often subjected to contamination by molds during preharvest and/or due to poor storage conditions [10]. Prolonged storage and high temperature and humidity conditions are some of the factors that facilitate fungal development and production of attendant mycotoxins, compromising feed quality that can adversely affect the health of animals and humans [11].Some molds are capable of producing mycotoxins, and some of these mycotoxins can cause some degree of acute toxicity when given in high amounts and are the potential carcinogens [12]. Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Penicillium are the three most important genera of toxigenic fungi in the tropics [13]. The presence of toxigenic fungi, some producing mycotoxin in farmed fish has increased in recent years owing to the increasing use of plant materials as components for fish feeding [5]. Contamination of fish feeds by mycotoxins and the possible transfer of these toxins into farmed fish and fish-derived products for human consumption remain a serious food safety concern [14].Around 300–400 mycotoxin types are known to date [15], but the most important in tropical countries are aflatoxins (AFs) (AFB1, B2, G1, and G2) and fumonisins (FBs) (FB1, FB2, and FB3) [16]. In addition to AFs and FBs, ochratoxin A (OTA) and trichothecenes (THs) are also important [17].Mycotoxin contamination has been implicated with a reduction in fish productivity, anemia, hemorrhaging, liver impairment, weight loss, increased vulnerability to secondary infectious diseases, reduced reproductive capacity, and even mortality [18–21], resulting in serious economic losses [22, 23].Since aquaculture is a growing sector in a majority of the developing countries, especially in Africa, the aim of this review is to give an overview of fungal and mycotoxin contamination of fish feed, feed ingredients, and their effects on fish health.


## 2. Feed Consumption in Farmed Fish

Fish feed is the major cost item in intensive farming systems, and they represent 50 to 70 percent of fish farmers’ production costs [24]. Requirements for intensive aquaculture are high-quality animal protein, lipid, and other essential nutrients [25]. In order to reduce the feed cost, several efforts have been made to replace the expensive feed ingredients. Incorporating vegetable oil, increasing levels of plant ingredients, and reduction in the level of costly fish meal are appropriate husbandry practices that have been adopted to reduce maintenance costs (particularly feed costs). Zhao et al. [26] reported that fish meal can be completely replaced by soy protein concentrate by increasing feeding frequency for Nile tilapia less than 2 grams. A combination of 76% rice bran and 24% fish meal, which is a mix of dried freshwater shrimp Caridina sp., or maize bran, sometimes with the addition of some “dagaa” Rastrineobola argentea meal, shows good growth performance on fish [8, 27]. Despite their higher nutritional values, plant ingredients in fish feeds have a higher potential of being contaminated with toxigenic fungi than animal ingredients. This potential is further increased in tropical and subtropical conditions due to storage under humid and hot conditions [28].


## 3. Occurrence of Mycotoxigenic Fungi in Fish Feeds and Ingredients

Fungi are ubiquitous in the environment, being found in water and suitable organic nutrients when appropriate temperature conditions prevail [17]. They have been reported to occur in food and feed worldwide with some of them capable of producing a wide array of mycotoxins. Four major genera stand out: Alternaria, Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Penicillium [17]. Among the genus Aspergillus, A. flavus and A. parasiticus are the major aflatoxin producers that are likely harmful to animals or humans [11]. Several A. flavus strains may or may not produce either aflatoxin B1 or B2 [11]. Secondary metabolites such as sterigmatocystin, cyclopiazonic acid (CPA), kojic acid, beta-nitropropionic acid, aspertoxin, aflatrem, and aspergillic acid are other toxic compounds also produced by A. flavus [11]. Aspergillus parasiticus produces aflatoxins G1 and G2, in addition to aflatoxins B1 and B2, but does not produce CPA [11]. Aspergillus ochraceus and A. carbonarius are the main producers of ochratoxin A (OTA), and they are commonly found in grapes, dried vine fruits, wine, and coffee [29]. However, only a few strains of A. niger are capable of producing OTA [30]. Aspergillus fumigatus is the main producer of genotoxic and cytotoxic mycotoxins, like gliotoxin [31]. Some other species of Aspergillus, such as A. tamarii and A. versicolor, produce CPA and fumuclavine A and have been responsible for “kodua” poisoning [32]. Kodua is known for poisoning that causes tremors, sleepiness, and giddiness [32, 33].Aspergillus species are ubiquitous in tropical environments and are predominantly isolated in food and feed from the tropics [11]. Fish feeds are frequently contaminated by Aspergillus species (Table 1). Several studies performed in tropical countries reported that A. flavus and A. parasiticus are the major dominant species isolated from fish feed [33, 37, 39, 40]. Fallah et al. [39] and Hassan et al. [44] found that 47.5% and 70% of fish feed from Egypt and Iran, respectively, were contaminated by A. flavus. Fish feeds from Brazil and East Africa were contaminated by A. flavus at 35% and 54.5%, respectively [35, 40]. Aspergillus tamarii were isolated at a frequency of 9.1% and 8% in fish feeds from East Africa and Iran, respectively. Aspergillus niger (6%, 13.9%, 36%, and 39.1%) and A. ochraceus (10.2%) as the potential ochratoxigenic fungi were isolated from fish feed from East Africa, Iran, Portugal, and Brazil [10, 35, 39, 40]. Other Aspergillus species commonly isolated from fish feeds are A. versicolor, A. fumigatus, A. candidus, A. glaucus, and A. oryzae [35, 37, 39, 40]. Table 1 compares data from previous studies on the most frequently isolated fungi from fish feeds and their ingredients.Table 1
Frequently isolated fungi from fish feeds and feed ingredients from previous studies.
Source
Country
Sample size
Common isolates
Frequency of isolation (%)
References
Tilapia feeds
Egypt
25
A. flavus
∗
48
Mohammed et al. [34]
A. niger
40
A. fumigatus
8
A. ochraceus
4
Penicillium sp.,
40
Cladosporium sp.
8
Candida sp.
40
Fish feeds and ingredients
East Africa
52
A. flavus
∗
54.5
Marijani et al. [35]
A. tamarii
9.1
Mucorsp.
9
Phoma sp.
6.1
A. niger
6
E.rubrum
3
P. chrysogenum
3
Commercial and formulated fish feeds
Kenya
121
Asperigillus sp.
50.5
Njagi [36]
Mucor sp.∗
56
Rhizopus sp.
49.5
Saprolegnia sp.
42.5
Penicillium sp.
31
Fish feeds and ingredients
Brazil
54
Penicillium sp.∗
83.3
Gonçalves-Nunes et al. [37]
Aspergillus sp.
66.7
Rhizopus sp.
23.3
Cladosporium sp.
20
Rainbow trout feed
Argentina
28
Cladosporium cladosporioides
∗
53.6
Greco et al. [38]
Eurotium repens
21.4
Eurotium rubrum
14.3
Mucorsp.
7.1
A. versicolor
3.6
P. crustosum
3.6
P. expansum
3.6
P. chrysogenum
3.6
Fish feeds
Iran
86
A. flavus
∗
47.3
Fallah et al. [39]
A. parasiticus
∗
16.1
A. niger
13.9
A. ochraceus
10.2
A. fumigates
9
A. versicolor
<5
A. carbonarius
<5
A. nomius
<5
A.ustus
<5
Fusarium sp.
26.2
Eurotium sp.
10
Penicillium sp.
41.5
Mucor sp.
<10
Cladosporium sp.
<5
Alternaria sp.
<5
Fish feed
Brazil
60
Cladosporium sp.∗
85
Barbosa et al. [40]
P. citrinum
∗
71
A. flavu
35
A. niger
36
Eurotium sp.
20
Wallemia
40
Aureobasidium
10
Mucor, and
10
Nigrospora sp.
<10
Fish feeds
Brazil
36
A. flavus
∗
60.47
Filho et al. [41]
A. fumigates
6.98
A. terreus
2.32
A. candidus
2.32
A. oryzae
6.98
A. penicillioides
2.32
Eurotium sp.
18.61
Penicillium sp.
19.18
Cladosporium sp.
16.44
Fusarium sp.
8.22
Tilapia feed
Mexico
30
Aspergillus flavus
∗
6.7
Rodriguez–Cervantes et al. [42]
Fusarium sp.
6.7
Sea bass feeds
Portugal
87
Aspergillus niger
∗
39.1
Almeida et al. [10]
Aspergillus glaucus
29.9
Penicillium sp.
28.7
Cladosporium sp.
28.7
Fusarium sp.
25.3
Rainbow trout feed
Iran
A. flavus
∗
60.66
Alinezhad et al. [43]
A. niger
19.67
A. ochraceus
1.0
A. fumigates
2.0
A. clavatus
1.0
Penicillium sp.
14.0
Absidia sp.
12.0
Mucor sp.
2.0
Alternaria sp.
2.0
Fish feeds
Egypt
50
A. flavus
∗
56.0
Hassan et al. [44]
A. niger
4.0
A. ochraceus
2
A. candidus
8.0
Penicillium sp.
22.0
Mucor sp.
50.0
Cladosporium sp.
2.0
Rhizopus sp.
4.0
∗The most commonly isolated species.Fusarium species are destructive pathogens on cereal crops and other commodities and produce some of the most commonly encountered mycotoxins including the trichothecenes and fumonisins in feeds [16]. Fusarium verticillioides is ubiquitous in maize and produces FBs, which are generally more prevalent when crops are under drought stress or suffer excessive insect damage [45]. Fusarium graminearum is the main producer of the deoxynivalenol (DON) and estrogenic compound zearalenone (ZEN) [46]. This species is pathogenic on maize, wheat, and barley and produces these toxins whenever it infects these grains before harvest. Aspergillus niger also produces FBs, and several commodities may be affected [30]. The most common fungi associated with maize which is the common ingredient in fish feeds are Fusarium verticillioides and Fusarium proliferatum. A study on the infections of Fusarium sp. in feed ingredients was done by Ivić et al. [47] and found that the dominant species were 27% of F. graminearum isolated on wheat, 83% of F. verticillioides isolated on maize, and 34% of F. sporotrichioides isolated on soybean. The authors of this study concluded that the risk of contamination with Fusarium toxins is higher for maize and wheat than for soybean. Fusarium species appear to be uncommon to fish feeds as they were isolated in a very small percentage but may cause adverse effects to fish [10, 37, 39, 42].SomePenicillium species are mycotoxin producers and can negatively affect the health of humans and animals [48]. Penicillium verrucosum produces OTA but occurs only in cool temperate climates, where it infects small grains like wheat and barley [48] and not commonly isolated in tropical areas. Penicillium citrinum is a species where citrinin toxin was first isolated, but the toxin has subsequently been identified to be produced by several Penicillium and Aspergillus species [49]. No information is available on the contamination of citrinin in fish feeds; however, its producer P. citrinum has been isolated from fish feeds [37, 40].Penicillium expansum, Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Paecilomyces fungal species produce patulin, whereas ergot alkaloids are compounds produced as a toxic mixture of alkaloids in the sclerotia of the species of Claviceps [50]. Penicillium expansum is particularly linked with a range of moldy fruits and vegetables, especially in rotting apples and figs while the species of Claviceps are common pathogens of several grass species. Penicillium expansum occurs best in wet, cool (<25°C) environments, and the growth rate was the fastest at a relative humidity of 90% [50]. Penicillium expansum has been isolated in fish feeds, and the use of vegetables as feed ingredients could be the reason for the presence of this species in the finished fish feeds [38].Penicillium crustosum and P. commune are closely related and produce CPA and roquefortine C (ROQ-C) [51]. These species were infrequently encountered in fish feeds [38]. Penicillium chrysogenum is also a ROQ-C producer and had been isolated in fish feeds [35, 38]. Other Penicillium species which are isolated in fish feeds are Penicillium glabrum, P. nalgiovense, P. corylophilum, P. implicatum, and P. restrictum [37, 38, 41].The genusEurotium is also an important mycotoxin producer and grow exceptionally well at low water activities [52]. Most of the Eurotium species are of special interest to feed mycology due to their xerophilic physiology; many isolates are able to grow at water activities below 0.75, and some isolates are able to grow at values as low as 0.64 aw [53]. Eurotium amstelodami, E. repens, and E. rubrum reported to produce aflatoxin [23, 38], and ochratoxin A is produced by E. amstelodami [23]. Although most of the studies on fish feed mycobiota have been concentrated on the presence of mycotoxigenic genera Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Penicillium, Eurotium sp. have as well reported as frequent contaminants [38, 39, 41]. Commonly, Eurotium species isolated from fish feeds are E. repens and E. rubrum [35, 38]. Eurotium rubrum were isolated with a frequency of 25% and 3%, while E. repens (21.4%) were isolated from fish feed from East Africa and Argentina. Since some of the Eurotium species produce aflatoxin and OTA, their presence in fish feeds could affect fish health and cause serious economic losses.The commonly used raw ingredients in the manufacturing of fish feeds are maize, rice, wheat bran, soybean, sunflower seed cake, and cottonseed cake, which are highly susceptible to mycotoxin-producing fungi [17, 54, 55]. Several mycotoxigenic fungi had been isolated from ingredients used for fish feed from different fish farms around the world [28, 35, 36]. The presence of these mycotoxigenic fungi in the ingredients might also cause the formation of mycotoxin in the finished fish feeds [35, 38, 40]. Aspergillus flavus was the dominant fungal species isolated from maize bran, cottonseed cake, sunflower oil seed cake, and cassava; however, soybean samples were the least contaminated by mycotoxigenic fungi [35]. In another survey conducted in Brazil, soybean bran intended for fish feeds were contaminated by A. flavus (61.5%), P. citrinum (81.8%), and A. parasiticus (7.7%) [37]. Aspergillus flavus was the dominant species isolated from maize bran (50%), and other cereals (66.6%) were designated for fish feed from Brazil. Other fungal species isolated at higher frequencies from maize bran and other cereals were P. citrinum (50% and 90.9%) and A. parasiticus (16.7%), respectively [37].Factors like high temperature and relative humidity, together with inappropriate handling and storage practices increase the likelihood of the growth of mycotoxigenic fungi. In addition, storage practices in most developing countries are poor, which make them more vulnerable to fungal contamination [56]. Also, insect infestation can cause heating and generation of moisture. For the cereal grain, an increase in temperature is expected due to respiration, which may likewise occur due to insect or fungal activity. Heating results in moisture condensation in cool areas inside the grain mass [57]. As a result of this, further fungal growth and insect infestation are encouraged. Normally, the standard moisture content required for most cereals often used as feed ingredients should be 14% before storage [58]. Therefore, it is very important to utilize feed ingredients which have moisture content at or below the safe level of 13% [58]. Aeration with cool air may also help to protect the stored ingredients against fungal development [59].


## 4. Mycotoxin Contamination in Fish Feed and Feed Ingredients

Plant proteins such as oilseeds are excellent alternatives to animal proteins in fish feeds because they are less expensive and are more abundant in many parts of the world [5]. Diets for Nile tilapia and warm water species such as carp and channel catfish are predominantly formulated using high amounts of grains and plant proteins, and as such, the feeds are at high risk to contamination by mycotoxins [60]. Cereals are common ingredients used in fish feeds and like the oilseeds, they are the main point of entry for many mycotoxins in humans and fish dietary systems, particularly in Africa [35]. Bran, which is also a common ingredient in fish feed, is usually derived from any cereal grains such as rice, maize, wheat, oats, barley, rye, and millet during the dry milling process [61]. Unfortunately, this dry milling is not likely to destroy mycotoxins. Mycotoxins are generally concentrated in the bran and outer layers of grains but are less in the endosperm [62]. This suggests that bran or wholemeal grains have the potential to contain higher concentrations of certain mycotoxins than those manufactured from flours or grits milled from the grain endosperm [61]. The use of mycotoxin contaminated bran and other ingredients provide an avenue for the finished fish feed to contain similar mycotoxins posing a health hazard in fish.


### 4.1. Occurrence of Aflatoxin

The incidences of aflatoxin contamination in fish feed have been reported in many countries of the world especially in the tropical and subtropical regions as shown in Table2. Therefore, this means fish feed in both tropical and subtropical regions are more prone to aflatoxin contamination compared to the temperate regions [68]. The recommended regulatory limit for aflatoxin in fish feeds is 20 μg·kg−1 [66], but a majority of samples from tropical countries are above this limit [35, 39, 40].Table 2
Mycotoxin levels (μg·kg−1) in fish feed from developing countries.
Source
Country
Sample size
Mycotoxin contamination∗
PL %+
Reference
AF
FB
DON
OTA
NIV
AOH
T-2
ZEN
Tilapia feeds
Egypt
25
<LOD
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
0
Mohamed et al. [34]
Fish feeds processed at farm level
East Africa
52
126
755.4
2834.6
nd
732.5
91.3
<LOD
na
48 (AF), 0 (FB), 0 (DON)
Marijani et al. [35]
Abalone feeds
South Africa
0.98
424
100
0.259
100
na
na
na
0
Laubscher [63]
Tilapia feeds
Mexico
30
<LOD
2587
na
na
na
na
na
na
0
Rodriguez-Cervantes et al. [42]
Rainbow trout
Argentina
28
2.82∗∗∗
<LOD
230∗∗
5.26∗∗
na
na
70.08∗∗
87.97∗∗
0
Greco et al. [38]
Fish feeds
Iran
86
68.5
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
17.1
Fallah et al. [39]
Fish feeds
Brazil
60
<LOD
4.94
na
<LOD
na
na
na
na
0
Barbosa et al. [40]
Fish feeds
Central Europe
na
na
na
825
na
na
na
na
511
0
Pietsch et al. [64]
Fish feeds
Egypt
50
150
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
40
Hassan et al. [44]
Fish feeds
Brazil
54
3.8∗∗∗
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
0
Gonçalves-Nunes et al. [37]
Sea bass feeds
Portugal
87
nd
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
0
Almeida et al. [10]
Rainbow trout
Iran
67.35
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
nm
Alinezhad et al. [43]
Fish feeds
Kenya
81
39.7
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
13.5
Mwihia et al. [65]
∗Maximum level of mycotoxin content in positive samples; ∗∗median of positive samples excluding results of estimated concentrations; ∗∗∗mean level of mycotoxin content in positive samples; +percentage of samples that are above the permissible limit (PL) of AFs, FBs, and DON in feeds recommended by FDA [66] and EU [67]; nd, not detected; na, not analyzed in the study; nm, not mentioned in the study.In the study of Marijani et al. [35], levels of mycotoxins in fish feeds and feed ingredients from fish farms, imported fish feeds, and feeds made by local feed millers in East Africa were analyzed. Results obtained revealed that aflatoxin contamination was higher in feed processed at farm level in terms of incidence rate (64.3%), feed ingredients (50%), and local commercial feed mills (35.7%), but not in imported feed. Inclusion of antifungal agents in imported feeds to prevent fungal growth during prolonged and varied storage conditions in farms might be a possible reason for the absence of aflatoxin in imported feed samples [35]. In the same study, fish feed samples from Kenya were found to be highly contaminated with aflatoxin at concentrations ranging from <2−806.9 μg·kg−1, followed by those from Tanzania (<2–377.9 μg·kg−1), Uganda (<2−28.0 μg·kg−1), and Rwanda (<2–4.8 μg·kg−1). In another study from Kenya, eighty-four percent of fish feed samples were tested positive for aflatoxins, ranging from 1.8 to 39.7 μg·kg−1 [65]. Other studies from tropical countries, such as Brazil [39], Iran [40], and Egypt [44], reported that fish feeds were contaminated by aflatoxin at a concentration ranging from 1.83–67.35 μg·kg−1, 0.46–68.5 μg·kg−1, and 52.5–150 μg·kg−1, respectively. In another study from Egypt, around 42.86% of fish feed were contaminated with aflatoxins at a value higher than the permissible limit of 20 μg·kg−1 [69].Alinezhad et al. [43] observed that pellets of rainbow trout feed and feed ingredients from Iran were contaminated with aflatoxins in the range of 1.83 to 67.35 μg·kg−1. Altug and Beklevik [70] reported aflatoxin contamination in 56% of commercial fish feeds in Turkey is at levels of over 21 μg·kg−1. Hassan et al. [44] studied the mycological quality of fish feed from Egypt and detected aflatoxin at significantly higher levels at mean levels of 105.2 ± 1.3 μg·kg−1 in 40% of samples.Gonçalves-Nunes et al. [37] screened raw materials and finished fish feeds for aflatoxin contamination in Brazil. Aflatoxin B1 was detected in the mean level of 1.1 μg·kg−1, 7.4 μg·kg−1, and 3.8 μg·kg−1 in maize bran, other cereal products, and finished fish feed, respectively. Another fish feed survey conducted in Brazil by Hashimoto et al. [71] detected aflatoxin at maximum contamination levels of 15.6 μg·kg−1. In addition, a survey on commercial shrimp feeds conducted in the Philippines found AFB1 contamination levels up to 120 μg·kg−1 [69].Aflatoxin contamination of cottonseed cake has been a major concern worldwide as extremely high contents ranging between 200 and 300 mg·kg‒1 were reported in samples exported from the USA to the European markets [72]. In a survey done by Rodriguez et al. [73] on contamination of aflatoxins in feeds and their ingredients in the Middle East and Africa, it was found out that sunflower meal has the highest contamination level in the whole survey (556 μg·kg−1). A survey done in East Africa by Marijani et al. [35] found that cottonseed cake intended for fish feeds was contaminated by aflatoxin with a maximum concentration of 377.9 μg·kg−1, while soybeans were not contaminated. Sunflower seed cake was the only ingredient that contained the highest AFB1 concentration of 806.9 μg·kg−1 when compared to maize bran, soybeans, cottonseed cake, and rice bran [35]. In another survey from Tanzania conducted by Mmongoyo et al. [74], sunflower seed cake was contaminated with aflatoxin with a maximum concentration of 662.7 μg·kg−1 recorded. Interventions to control aflatoxin contamination along the oilseed product value chain should be implemented to enhance feed safety in African countries.Looking at the data in Table2, it can be confirmed that the occurrence of aflatoxin is very high from fish feeds from Africa. This is worrying as the high incidences of aflatoxicosis in human were also reported in Africa [75]. During human aflatoxicosis outbreaks in 2005 and 2006, maize were heavily contaminated with aflatoxin with maximum levels of 48,000 and 24,000 μg·kg−1, respectively [75] Daniel et al. [75] concluded that drought and famines followed by unseasonable rains during harvest and improper storage of homegrown maize in moist conditions were the reasons behind the high incidence of aflatoxicosis.Maize intended for fish feeds was contaminated by AFB1 at a maximum concentration of 135 μg·kg−1 [35]. Similar results were also reported by Reddy and Salleh [76], who found out that 22.5% of samples of maize had AFB1 contamination ranging from 20.6 to 135 μg·kg−1. The poorest quality maize is used for animal feeding, which makes animals more at risk to aflatoxicosis [45].Rice is another important staple food in Africa and Asia and its bran is widely used for animal feeding [77]. Rice bran intended for fish feed from East Africa were not contaminated by aflatoxin [35]. In another study from Iran, rice bran was contaminated by aflatoxin with the mean concentration of 18 μg·kg−1 [78]. Wheat does not grow well in tropical climates; however, its bran is widely used as a component of animal and fish feeds [28, 79]. Another cereal which is used in fish feed as an ingredient is sorghum. The incidence of aflatoxin in sorghum and millet from northern Nigeria was investigated by Apen Daneil et al. [80], and they found out that 28.6% sorghum (0.96–21.74 μg·kg−1) and millet grain (105–14.96 μg·kg−1) were contaminated with aflatoxin. Out of 52 ingredients intended for fish feed from East Africa, sorghum and wheat bran were detected at a very low concentration of less than 3 μg·kg−1 [35, 81]. Another study from Brazil reported that out of 140 sorghum collected, only 12.8% were contaminated by aflatoxin [82]. Shetty and Bhat [83] found out that 20% of normal sorghum and 89% of normal maize samples also contained aflatoxin B1. Bandyopadhyay et al. [84] suggested that if the primary cereal is sorghum instead of maize, then the risk of aflatoxin-related problems is reduced by 4-fold. Low level of aflatoxin contamination in wheat bran, sorghum, and soya bean suggests that they are likely to be useful in the formulation of fish feeds with aflatoxin below levels that could elicit any adverse complications on fish health.


### 4.2. Occurrence ofFusarium Mycotoxins

There are several reports on the contamination of cereal grains and animal feed withFusarium mycotoxins worldwide [17, 79]. The most important among them are the trichothecenes, ZEN, and the fumonisins [85]. The trichothecenes are subdivided into four basic groups, with types A and B being the most important. Type A trichothecenes include T-2 toxin, HT-2 toxin, neosolaniol, and diacetoxyscirpenol (DAS) [85]. Type B trichothecenes include DON also known as vomitoxin, nivalenol (NIV), and fusarenon-X. Fumonisins, particularly FB1, are found in maize grain which is a major component of feeds for warm water fish [86]. Contamination of fumonisin in cereals is dependent on the geographical region, season, and conditions under which the particular cereal is grown, harvested, and stored [45]. The prevalence of fumonisin has been reported to be 100% or close to it in all surveillance studies on maize from different parts of Africa [13]. Several studies have shown that maize bran which is mainly used for animal/fish feed has been contaminated with FBs [21, 79]. Fumonisin was detected at the concentration of 1 mg·kg-1 on the maize bran used for animal feed from Tanzania [87]. The prevalence of F. verticillioides and production of FB1 in cereal grains and oilseeds in Zimbabwe was established by Gamanya [88]. While the authors did not find Fusarium and FB1 contamination in sunflower and soybean samples tested, high incidences were recorded for maize followed by wheat and sorghum [88]. Maize bran and soybeans from East Africa used for fish feeds contained a maximum of up to 3970.1 μg·kg−1 and 1402.3 μg·kg−1 of FB1, respectively, while cottonseed cake, sunflower seed cake, and rice bran were not contaminated with FB1 [35]. This suggests that maize is more susceptible to FBs when compared to other feed ingredients. In the same study, they found out that fish feeds processed at the farm level contained a maximum FBs concentration of 2834.6 μg·kg−1 [35], and samples tested were below the regulatory limits of 5000 μg·kg−1 recommended by EU [67].DON is the most often occurring trichothecene and is prevalent in crops used for food and feed production, generally found in various cereal crops such as wheat, barley, oats, rye, rice, and maize [85]. Natural occurrence of DON in cereals is certainly prevalent, and surveys from South America, Canada, China, and many countries of Europe have shown contamination levels in excess of 50% in oats, barley, and wheat with mean concentrations as high as 9 mg·kg‒1 in barley [46]. In a survey carried out between 2004 and 2007, DON was the predominant mycotoxin with highest levels detected in wheat bran [89]. Few studies have been carried out on the contamination of DON in finished fish feeds [86]. A survey done in Central Europe has shown that more than 80% of the samples from commercial fish feed were contaminated with DON with a mean concentration of 289 μg·kg−1 recorded [64]. Fish feed processed at farm level were contaminated with the mean DON concentration of 755 μg·kg−1 while among the ingredients, maize bran was highly contaminated with 984 μg·kg−1 [35]. Another study from Nigeria found out that fish feeds were contaminated with a mean DON concentration of 85.9 μg·kg−1 [90]. All fish feeds from these studies were below the regulatory limits of 5000 μg·kg−1 recommended by EU [67]. Sixty-eight samples of shrimp and fish feed from Asia and Europe were contaminated with DON at a mean concentration of 162 μg·kg−1 and maximum level of 413 μg·kg−1 [91].Zearalenone, a toxic metabolite ofFusarium fungi is commonly found as contaminant in maize, and also it may occur in oats, barley, wheat, and sorghum [92]. However, the production of ZEN is favored by high humidity and low temperature conditions [93]. It may co-occur with DON in grains such as wheat, barley, oats, and maize and FBs in maize [92]. ZEN was found in fish feed from Asia with average concentrations of 76.2 μg·kg−1 [28]. Other studies from Europe reported that fish feeds were contaminated with ZEN with a maximum concentration of 511 μg·kg−1 [64]. However, the ZEN values found in these studies do not exceed the values (5000 μg·kg−1) currently recommended by the European Commission in animal feeds [67]. DON and ZEN in unprocessed cereals and soybean were detected at the mean concentrations of 1,461 ± 2,265 μg·kg−1 and 656 ± 853 μg·kg−1, respectively, in samples collected in 2014, while in 2015 these means were 2,687 ± 2,731 μg·kg−1 and 1,140 ± 1,630 μg·kg−1, respectively [94]. The authors suggested that higher contamination determined during 2015 could be explained by high to extreme humidity evidenced in the period of cereals’ growth and harvesting. The occurrence of DON and FBs in fish feeds, even at low levels, may be of concern, since it can cause growth retardation and immunotoxic effects in fish [95]. These results suggest that ZEN contamination may pose little health risk (if any) to the consumers of the fish [96].


### 4.3. Other Mycotoxins

Other mycotoxins like OTA, NIV, DAS, T−2 toxin, alternariol (AOH), and ROQ-C have been reported to occur in fish feeds and ingredients intended for fish feed formulation [35]. Cottonseed cake for fish feed formulation was the only ingredient contaminated by OTA with a maximum concentration of 24.2 μg·kg−1 [35]. Nivalenol was detected in fish feeds processed at farm level with a maximum concentration of 732.5 μg·kg−1, while no ingredients intended for fish feeding was contaminated by NIV. Other mycotoxins like DAS, T-2, and ROQ-C were detected in fish feeds and their ingredients but at very low concentrations [35].Also, an immunosuppressive mycotoxin, gliotoxin, was detected in oilseed cakes at levels up to 45μg·kg−1, which was associated with the presence of toxigenic isolates of A. fumigatus [97].


## 4.1. Occurrence of Aflatoxin

The incidences of aflatoxin contamination in fish feed have been reported in many countries of the world especially in the tropical and subtropical regions as shown in Table2. Therefore, this means fish feed in both tropical and subtropical regions are more prone to aflatoxin contamination compared to the temperate regions [68]. The recommended regulatory limit for aflatoxin in fish feeds is 20 μg·kg−1 [66], but a majority of samples from tropical countries are above this limit [35, 39, 40].Table 2
Mycotoxin levels (μg·kg−1) in fish feed from developing countries.
Source
Country
Sample size
Mycotoxin contamination∗
PL %+
Reference
AF
FB
DON
OTA
NIV
AOH
T-2
ZEN
Tilapia feeds
Egypt
25
<LOD
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
0
Mohamed et al. [34]
Fish feeds processed at farm level
East Africa
52
126
755.4
2834.6
nd
732.5
91.3
<LOD
na
48 (AF), 0 (FB), 0 (DON)
Marijani et al. [35]
Abalone feeds
South Africa
0.98
424
100
0.259
100
na
na
na
0
Laubscher [63]
Tilapia feeds
Mexico
30
<LOD
2587
na
na
na
na
na
na
0
Rodriguez-Cervantes et al. [42]
Rainbow trout
Argentina
28
2.82∗∗∗
<LOD
230∗∗
5.26∗∗
na
na
70.08∗∗
87.97∗∗
0
Greco et al. [38]
Fish feeds
Iran
86
68.5
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
17.1
Fallah et al. [39]
Fish feeds
Brazil
60
<LOD
4.94
na
<LOD
na
na
na
na
0
Barbosa et al. [40]
Fish feeds
Central Europe
na
na
na
825
na
na
na
na
511
0
Pietsch et al. [64]
Fish feeds
Egypt
50
150
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
40
Hassan et al. [44]
Fish feeds
Brazil
54
3.8∗∗∗
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
0
Gonçalves-Nunes et al. [37]
Sea bass feeds
Portugal
87
nd
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
0
Almeida et al. [10]
Rainbow trout
Iran
67.35
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
nm
Alinezhad et al. [43]
Fish feeds
Kenya
81
39.7
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
13.5
Mwihia et al. [65]
∗Maximum level of mycotoxin content in positive samples; ∗∗median of positive samples excluding results of estimated concentrations; ∗∗∗mean level of mycotoxin content in positive samples; +percentage of samples that are above the permissible limit (PL) of AFs, FBs, and DON in feeds recommended by FDA [66] and EU [67]; nd, not detected; na, not analyzed in the study; nm, not mentioned in the study.In the study of Marijani et al. [35], levels of mycotoxins in fish feeds and feed ingredients from fish farms, imported fish feeds, and feeds made by local feed millers in East Africa were analyzed. Results obtained revealed that aflatoxin contamination was higher in feed processed at farm level in terms of incidence rate (64.3%), feed ingredients (50%), and local commercial feed mills (35.7%), but not in imported feed. Inclusion of antifungal agents in imported feeds to prevent fungal growth during prolonged and varied storage conditions in farms might be a possible reason for the absence of aflatoxin in imported feed samples [35]. In the same study, fish feed samples from Kenya were found to be highly contaminated with aflatoxin at concentrations ranging from <2−806.9 μg·kg−1, followed by those from Tanzania (<2–377.9 μg·kg−1), Uganda (<2−28.0 μg·kg−1), and Rwanda (<2–4.8 μg·kg−1). In another study from Kenya, eighty-four percent of fish feed samples were tested positive for aflatoxins, ranging from 1.8 to 39.7 μg·kg−1 [65]. Other studies from tropical countries, such as Brazil [39], Iran [40], and Egypt [44], reported that fish feeds were contaminated by aflatoxin at a concentration ranging from 1.83–67.35 μg·kg−1, 0.46–68.5 μg·kg−1, and 52.5–150 μg·kg−1, respectively. In another study from Egypt, around 42.86% of fish feed were contaminated with aflatoxins at a value higher than the permissible limit of 20 μg·kg−1 [69].Alinezhad et al. [43] observed that pellets of rainbow trout feed and feed ingredients from Iran were contaminated with aflatoxins in the range of 1.83 to 67.35 μg·kg−1. Altug and Beklevik [70] reported aflatoxin contamination in 56% of commercial fish feeds in Turkey is at levels of over 21 μg·kg−1. Hassan et al. [44] studied the mycological quality of fish feed from Egypt and detected aflatoxin at significantly higher levels at mean levels of 105.2 ± 1.3 μg·kg−1 in 40% of samples.Gonçalves-Nunes et al. [37] screened raw materials and finished fish feeds for aflatoxin contamination in Brazil. Aflatoxin B1 was detected in the mean level of 1.1 μg·kg−1, 7.4 μg·kg−1, and 3.8 μg·kg−1 in maize bran, other cereal products, and finished fish feed, respectively. Another fish feed survey conducted in Brazil by Hashimoto et al. [71] detected aflatoxin at maximum contamination levels of 15.6 μg·kg−1. In addition, a survey on commercial shrimp feeds conducted in the Philippines found AFB1 contamination levels up to 120 μg·kg−1 [69].Aflatoxin contamination of cottonseed cake has been a major concern worldwide as extremely high contents ranging between 200 and 300 mg·kg‒1 were reported in samples exported from the USA to the European markets [72]. In a survey done by Rodriguez et al. [73] on contamination of aflatoxins in feeds and their ingredients in the Middle East and Africa, it was found out that sunflower meal has the highest contamination level in the whole survey (556 μg·kg−1). A survey done in East Africa by Marijani et al. [35] found that cottonseed cake intended for fish feeds was contaminated by aflatoxin with a maximum concentration of 377.9 μg·kg−1, while soybeans were not contaminated. Sunflower seed cake was the only ingredient that contained the highest AFB1 concentration of 806.9 μg·kg−1 when compared to maize bran, soybeans, cottonseed cake, and rice bran [35]. In another survey from Tanzania conducted by Mmongoyo et al. [74], sunflower seed cake was contaminated with aflatoxin with a maximum concentration of 662.7 μg·kg−1 recorded. Interventions to control aflatoxin contamination along the oilseed product value chain should be implemented to enhance feed safety in African countries.Looking at the data in Table2, it can be confirmed that the occurrence of aflatoxin is very high from fish feeds from Africa. This is worrying as the high incidences of aflatoxicosis in human were also reported in Africa [75]. During human aflatoxicosis outbreaks in 2005 and 2006, maize were heavily contaminated with aflatoxin with maximum levels of 48,000 and 24,000 μg·kg−1, respectively [75] Daniel et al. [75] concluded that drought and famines followed by unseasonable rains during harvest and improper storage of homegrown maize in moist conditions were the reasons behind the high incidence of aflatoxicosis.Maize intended for fish feeds was contaminated by AFB1 at a maximum concentration of 135 μg·kg−1 [35]. Similar results were also reported by Reddy and Salleh [76], who found out that 22.5% of samples of maize had AFB1 contamination ranging from 20.6 to 135 μg·kg−1. The poorest quality maize is used for animal feeding, which makes animals more at risk to aflatoxicosis [45].Rice is another important staple food in Africa and Asia and its bran is widely used for animal feeding [77]. Rice bran intended for fish feed from East Africa were not contaminated by aflatoxin [35]. In another study from Iran, rice bran was contaminated by aflatoxin with the mean concentration of 18 μg·kg−1 [78]. Wheat does not grow well in tropical climates; however, its bran is widely used as a component of animal and fish feeds [28, 79]. Another cereal which is used in fish feed as an ingredient is sorghum. The incidence of aflatoxin in sorghum and millet from northern Nigeria was investigated by Apen Daneil et al. [80], and they found out that 28.6% sorghum (0.96–21.74 μg·kg−1) and millet grain (105–14.96 μg·kg−1) were contaminated with aflatoxin. Out of 52 ingredients intended for fish feed from East Africa, sorghum and wheat bran were detected at a very low concentration of less than 3 μg·kg−1 [35, 81]. Another study from Brazil reported that out of 140 sorghum collected, only 12.8% were contaminated by aflatoxin [82]. Shetty and Bhat [83] found out that 20% of normal sorghum and 89% of normal maize samples also contained aflatoxin B1. Bandyopadhyay et al. [84] suggested that if the primary cereal is sorghum instead of maize, then the risk of aflatoxin-related problems is reduced by 4-fold. Low level of aflatoxin contamination in wheat bran, sorghum, and soya bean suggests that they are likely to be useful in the formulation of fish feeds with aflatoxin below levels that could elicit any adverse complications on fish health.


## 4.2. Occurrence ofFusarium Mycotoxins

There are several reports on the contamination of cereal grains and animal feed withFusarium mycotoxins worldwide [17, 79]. The most important among them are the trichothecenes, ZEN, and the fumonisins [85]. The trichothecenes are subdivided into four basic groups, with types A and B being the most important. Type A trichothecenes include T-2 toxin, HT-2 toxin, neosolaniol, and diacetoxyscirpenol (DAS) [85]. Type B trichothecenes include DON also known as vomitoxin, nivalenol (NIV), and fusarenon-X. Fumonisins, particularly FB1, are found in maize grain which is a major component of feeds for warm water fish [86]. Contamination of fumonisin in cereals is dependent on the geographical region, season, and conditions under which the particular cereal is grown, harvested, and stored [45]. The prevalence of fumonisin has been reported to be 100% or close to it in all surveillance studies on maize from different parts of Africa [13]. Several studies have shown that maize bran which is mainly used for animal/fish feed has been contaminated with FBs [21, 79]. Fumonisin was detected at the concentration of 1 mg·kg-1 on the maize bran used for animal feed from Tanzania [87]. The prevalence of F. verticillioides and production of FB1 in cereal grains and oilseeds in Zimbabwe was established by Gamanya [88]. While the authors did not find Fusarium and FB1 contamination in sunflower and soybean samples tested, high incidences were recorded for maize followed by wheat and sorghum [88]. Maize bran and soybeans from East Africa used for fish feeds contained a maximum of up to 3970.1 μg·kg−1 and 1402.3 μg·kg−1 of FB1, respectively, while cottonseed cake, sunflower seed cake, and rice bran were not contaminated with FB1 [35]. This suggests that maize is more susceptible to FBs when compared to other feed ingredients. In the same study, they found out that fish feeds processed at the farm level contained a maximum FBs concentration of 2834.6 μg·kg−1 [35], and samples tested were below the regulatory limits of 5000 μg·kg−1 recommended by EU [67].DON is the most often occurring trichothecene and is prevalent in crops used for food and feed production, generally found in various cereal crops such as wheat, barley, oats, rye, rice, and maize [85]. Natural occurrence of DON in cereals is certainly prevalent, and surveys from South America, Canada, China, and many countries of Europe have shown contamination levels in excess of 50% in oats, barley, and wheat with mean concentrations as high as 9 mg·kg‒1 in barley [46]. In a survey carried out between 2004 and 2007, DON was the predominant mycotoxin with highest levels detected in wheat bran [89]. Few studies have been carried out on the contamination of DON in finished fish feeds [86]. A survey done in Central Europe has shown that more than 80% of the samples from commercial fish feed were contaminated with DON with a mean concentration of 289 μg·kg−1 recorded [64]. Fish feed processed at farm level were contaminated with the mean DON concentration of 755 μg·kg−1 while among the ingredients, maize bran was highly contaminated with 984 μg·kg−1 [35]. Another study from Nigeria found out that fish feeds were contaminated with a mean DON concentration of 85.9 μg·kg−1 [90]. All fish feeds from these studies were below the regulatory limits of 5000 μg·kg−1 recommended by EU [67]. Sixty-eight samples of shrimp and fish feed from Asia and Europe were contaminated with DON at a mean concentration of 162 μg·kg−1 and maximum level of 413 μg·kg−1 [91].Zearalenone, a toxic metabolite ofFusarium fungi is commonly found as contaminant in maize, and also it may occur in oats, barley, wheat, and sorghum [92]. However, the production of ZEN is favored by high humidity and low temperature conditions [93]. It may co-occur with DON in grains such as wheat, barley, oats, and maize and FBs in maize [92]. ZEN was found in fish feed from Asia with average concentrations of 76.2 μg·kg−1 [28]. Other studies from Europe reported that fish feeds were contaminated with ZEN with a maximum concentration of 511 μg·kg−1 [64]. However, the ZEN values found in these studies do not exceed the values (5000 μg·kg−1) currently recommended by the European Commission in animal feeds [67]. DON and ZEN in unprocessed cereals and soybean were detected at the mean concentrations of 1,461 ± 2,265 μg·kg−1 and 656 ± 853 μg·kg−1, respectively, in samples collected in 2014, while in 2015 these means were 2,687 ± 2,731 μg·kg−1 and 1,140 ± 1,630 μg·kg−1, respectively [94]. The authors suggested that higher contamination determined during 2015 could be explained by high to extreme humidity evidenced in the period of cereals’ growth and harvesting. The occurrence of DON and FBs in fish feeds, even at low levels, may be of concern, since it can cause growth retardation and immunotoxic effects in fish [95]. These results suggest that ZEN contamination may pose little health risk (if any) to the consumers of the fish [96].


## 4.3. Other Mycotoxins

Other mycotoxins like OTA, NIV, DAS, T−2 toxin, alternariol (AOH), and ROQ-C have been reported to occur in fish feeds and ingredients intended for fish feed formulation [35]. Cottonseed cake for fish feed formulation was the only ingredient contaminated by OTA with a maximum concentration of 24.2 μg·kg−1 [35]. Nivalenol was detected in fish feeds processed at farm level with a maximum concentration of 732.5 μg·kg−1, while no ingredients intended for fish feeding was contaminated by NIV. Other mycotoxins like DAS, T-2, and ROQ-C were detected in fish feeds and their ingredients but at very low concentrations [35].Also, an immunosuppressive mycotoxin, gliotoxin, was detected in oilseed cakes at levels up to 45μg·kg−1, which was associated with the presence of toxigenic isolates of A. fumigatus [97].


## 5. Effects of Mycotoxin on Fish Health

The toxic effects of mycotoxins are not only depended on the dose in feeds but as well as on the duration of toxin exposure, species, as well as the sex and age of the animal [94].Among the mycotoxins, AFB1 is the most studied in fish, possibly because of its natural occurrence being most widely found in tropical countries and that it is a known human carcinogen and most potent hepatotoxin [98]. These studies on toxicity effect of AFB1 on farmed aquatic species include rainbow trout, [23, 99, 100]; Nile tilapia, [14, 19, 101–104]; channel catfish, [22, 105]; rohu, [106, 107]; sea bass, [98]; gibel carp, [18]; beluga, [108]; and abalone [63].Considering the results of the studies in Table3, the biological effects of AFB1 in these aquatic species depend on the toxin’s concentration in feed and species. Channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, appears to be one of the most resistant among fish species when exposed to AFB1, while rainbow trout is the most sensitive to AFB1, and exposing them at concentrations as low as 0.4 μg AFB1 kg−1 may cause a 14% chance of developing tumors [22, 99]. Previously, there are no studies on hepatocellular carcinomas in channel fish caused by AFB1, but there are reports that dosing them with higher concentrations of AFB1 resulted in decreased growth rate and moderate internal lesions [22]. European sea bass is also sensitive to AFB1; El-Sayed and Khalil [98] found that exposing them for 4 days with median lethal concentration (LC50) of 180 μg kg−1 AFB1 causes aflatoxicosis. Other studies on fish have shown reduced growth rates particularly on Nile tilapia and channel catfish-fed diets containing 1880 and 10000 μg AFB1 kg−1 feed, respectively [14, 17, 22]. The mortality rate of 17% was reported in Nile tilapia fed diets containing 2000 μg AFB1 kg−1 [101]. Aflatoxin is also known to affect eye opacity resulting in cataract and blindness, yellowing of the body surface, wounds on the body surface, fin and tail rot, abnormal swimming, feeble and stationary movements, and reduced appetite in tilapia-fed aflatoxin-contaminated diet [19].Table 3
Toxic effects of aflatoxins, ochratoxin A, and sterigmatocystin in different fish species.
Mycotoxin
Species
Exposure dose
Administration
Duration of exposure (weeks)
Toxicity effect
References
Aflatoxin
Nile tilapia(Oreochromis niloticus)
100μg AFB1/kg
Feed: oral
10
Reduced the growth
El-Banna et al. [101]
Nile tilapia
200μg AFB1/kg
Feed: oral
10
Mortality (16.7%)
El-Banna et al. [101]
Nile tilapia
5–38.62μg AFB1/kg
Feed: oral
10
Survival rate reduced by up to 67%
Cagauan and Tayaban [19]
Nile tilapia
29μg AFB1/kg
Feed: oral
10
Yellowing of the body surface
Cagauan and Tayaban [19]
Tilapia
200 ppb AFB1/kg
Feed: oral
10
Total erythrocyte count, total leucocyte count, and hemoglobin count decreased; weight gain lowest and reduction in the rate survival rate
Selim et al. [104]
Tilapia
793 and 1641μg AFB1/kg
Feed: oral
5
Yellowing of the body surface
Deng et al. [103]
Tilapia
793 and 1641μg AFB1/kg
Feed—oral
15
Darkening of body surface
Deng et al. [103]
Tilapia
2.5 mg AFB1/kg
Feed: oral
Affect the hematocrit and growth performance
Tuan et al. [109]
Tilapia
2.5 mg AFB1/kg
Feed: oral
20
Abnormal behavior
Deng et al. [103]
Tilapia
245μg AFB1/kg
Feed: oral
20
Feed efficiency rate decreased
Deng et al. [103]
245, 638, 793 and 1641μg AFB1/kg
Feed: oral
20
Weight gain lowest
Deng et al. [103]
Channel catfish(Ictalurus punctatus)
10000μg AFB1/kg
Feed: oral
10
Decreased leukocyte count, increased haematopoietic activity of blood-forming tissues
Jantaroai and Lovell [22]
Aflatoxin
Rohu (Labeo rohita)
2.50 and 5.00 mg·kg−1
Intraperitoneal (i.p.)
10
Reduction in production of oxygen radicals by neutrophils
Sahoo and Mukherjee [110]
Rohu
1.25; 2.50 and 5.00 mg·kg−1
Intraperitoneal (i.p.)
10
Reduction of total protein and globulin levels
Sahoo and Mukherjee [110]
Rohu
10, 20 and 40 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
8
Total erythrocyte count, total leucocyte count, hemoglobin count, and nitroblue tetrazolium decreased
Mohapatra et al. [107]
Gibel carp (Carassius auratus gibelio)
20, and 2000μg AFB1 kg−1
Feed: oral
24
Gonadosomatic index (GSI), absolute brood amount (AF), relative brood amount (RF), and oocyte diameter were significantly lower
Huang et al. [18]
Juvenile rainbow trout
1190μg·kg−1
Feed: oral
3
Mortality
Nomura et al. [99]
Sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.)
0.18 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
4 days
Loss of equilibrium, rapid opercular movement, and hemorrhages of the dorsal skin surface
El-Sayed and Khali [98]
Sea bass
0.018 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
6
∗ALT, AST, and ALP enzymes increased; total protein; Albumin; and Globulin increased
El-Sayed and Khalil [98]
OTA
Channel catfish
1.0, 2.0, 4.0, or 8.0 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
8
Reductions in body weight gain
Manning et al. [111]
4.0, or 8.0 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
8
Feed conversion ratio was significantly poorer
Manning et al. [111]
8.0 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
8
Hematocrit was significantly lower
Manning et al. [111]
OTA
Juvenile common carp
4.0 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
6
Mortality (80.49%)
Manning et al. [112]
OTA
Black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon)
1000 μg·kg−1
Feed: oral
8
No negative impact in shrimp
Supamattaya et al. [113]
Stg
Nile tilapia
5, 10 and 50μg·ml−1
Intragastric
4
Clastogenic, decrease of body weight, and the increase in frequencies of micronucleated red blood cells (MN RBC) and chromosomal aberrations in the kidney
Abdel-Wahhab et al. [114]
Stg
Nile tilapia
1.6μg·kg−1 bwt
Corn oil: oral
4
Genotoxic and toxicopathological effects
Mahrous et al. [115]
∗ALT: alanine aminotransferase; ALP: alkaline phosphatase; AST: aspartate transaminase.Aflatoxin has been reported to disrupt the reproductive system in both male and female animals; however, very few studies had been reported in aquatic animals [116]. The few existing studies show a significant decrease in ovary weight, fecundity, and egg size of gibel carp fed on AFB1-treated ration [18]. In Nile tilapia, a negative effect on gonadosomatic index, fecundity, sperm count, sperm activity, and serum estradiol-17β concentrations was observed after feeding them with 1 and 3 mg·kg−1 AFB1 contaminated for 3 months [117].The contamination values of AFs found in fish feeds and their ingredients from Africa were high (Table2) and, as shown in Table 3, can negatively affect farmed fish, thus leading to economic loss to fish farmers.Fusarium mycotoxins are able to induce both acute and chronic toxic effects. Previous studies have shown that these effects depend on the dose, duration of exposure, and fish species that are exposed (Table 4). Rainbow trout are sensitive to DON when exposed at low dose, while channel catfish are much less responsive (Table 4). Hooft et al. [100] reported that feeding rainbow trout with low, graded levels of DON ranging from 3.0 × 10−4 to 2.6 × 10−3 mg·kg−1 from naturally contaminated maize resulted in highly significant decrease in growth, feed intake, feed efficiency, and protein and energy utilization, whereas channel catfish fed of diets containing up to 10 mg·kg−1 DON from either a purified source or naturally contaminated wheat had no effect on the feed consumption, growth, hematocrit values, or liver weight [119]. Also, the rainbow trout liver is sensitive to FB1 because it induces changes in sphingolipid metabolism [131] and is a cancer promoter in this species [123]. Growth performance of Nile tilapia fingerlings was negatively affected when fed with both moniliformin (MON) and FB1 at 70 and 40 mg·kg-1, respectively. However, when compared to channel catfish, Nile tilapia appears to be more resistant to these two mycotoxins as no mortality and histopathological lesions have been reported [102].Table 4
Toxic effects ofFusarium mycotoxins in different species of fish.
Mycotoxin
Species
Exposure dose
Administration
Duration of exposure (weeks)
Toxicity effect
References
DON
Rainbow troutOncorhynchus mykiss
2.6 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
8
Decrease in growth, feed intake, feed efficiency, and protein and energy utilization.
Hooft et al. [100]
Atlantic salmonSalmo salar L.
3.7 × 10−3 mg·kg‒ 1
8
Reduction in feed intake and decrease in specific growth rate
Döll et al. [118]
Channel catfishIctalurus punctatus
5.0–10.0 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
8
Mortality
Manning et al. [119]
T-2 toxin
Juvenile channel catfish
1.25, 2.5, and 5.0 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
8
Reductions in growth and hematocrit values were adversely affected
Manning et al. [120]
5.0 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
8
Histopathological anomalies of stomach, head, and trunk kidneys
Manning et al. [120]
Juvenile common carp
1.0 or 2.0 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
6
Mortality
Manning et al. [112]
Pacific white shrimpLitopenaeus vannamei
1.2, 2.4, 4.8, and 12.2 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
3
Decrease in growth and survival rate
Deng et al. [103]
2.4 and 4.8 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
3
Antioxidant enzymes, superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx), total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), and also glutathione (GSH) content increased
Deng et al. [103]
12.2 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
3
SOD and GPx, T-AOC, and GSH content decreased, cell autophagy
Deng et al. [103]
MON
Channel catfish
20, 40, 60, and 120 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
10
Reductions in growth,
Yildirim et al. [121]
Channel catfish
60 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
10
Low hematocrit level and high serum pyruvate level
Yildirim et al. [121]
Nile tilapia
60 and 150 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
8
Reductions in growth and high serum pyruvate levels
Tuan et al. [122]
Nile tilapia
150 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
8
Hematocrit was significantly low
Tuan et al. [122]
FB1
Channel catfish
80, 320, or 720 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
14
Reductions in growth, lower hematocrit and red cell counts, and higher white cell counts
Lumlertdacha et al. [105]
Channel catfish
20, 80, 320, or 720 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
14
Swollen hepatocytes in the liver with lipid-containing vacuoles, lymphocyte infiltration, and scattered necrotic hepatocytes
Lumlertdacha et al. [105]
Rainbow trout
23 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
42
Cancer promoter
Carlson et al. [123]
Nile tilapia
40, 70, 150 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
8
Lower mean weight gains
Tuan et al. [122]
Nile tilapia
150 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
8
Haematocrit was decreased and ratio between free sphinganine and free sphingosine (SA/SO) in the liver increased
Tuan et al. [122]
Common carpCyprinus carpio
100 and 10 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
6
Blood vessels, liver, exocrine and endocrine pancreas, excretory and haematopoietic kidney, and heart and brain were sensitive
Petrinec et al. [124]
Common carp
0.5 and 5.0 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
6
Loss of body weight and alterations of haematological and biochemical parameters in target organs
Pepeljnjak et al. [125]
5.0 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
6
Increase in bacterial infection
Pepeljnjak et al. [125]
ZEN
ZebrafishDanio rerio
1000 and 3200 ng·L−1
6
Reduced spawning frequency
Schwartz et al. [126]
Zebrafish
1000 ng·L−1
26
Affect growth and changed relative fecundity from one generation to another
Schwartz et al. [127]
Black tiger shrimpPenaeus monodon Fabricius
500 and 1000 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
10
Histological changes in hepatopancreatic tissue
Bundit et al. [128]
Common carp
0.332, 0.621 and 0.797 mg·kg‒1
Feed: oral
4
No effect on growth but effects on haematological parameters
Pietsch et al. [129]
Juvenile rainbow trout
1.810 mg·kg−1
Feed: oral
10
No effects on growth and may accelerate sexual maturation of female fish
Woźny et al. [130]Reduction in growth, feed efficiency, and feed intake in fish fed with DON-contaminated diet was reported by Tola et al. [95], Hooft et al. [100], and Döll et al. [118]; however, there are also reports of DON not interfering in the weight gain of fish [132, 133].ZEN has been implicated in reproductive disorders of farm animals [134]; however, very few studies have been done on the effect of ZEN in farmed aquatic species. In zebrafish (Danio rerio), ZEN reduced spawning frequency [126] or changed their relative fecundity from one generation to another [127]. In another study, defects in the heart and eye development and upward curvature of the body axis of were observed when zebrafish larvae were exposed to 500 µg·L−1 or higher of ZEN [135]. By considering the few studies made in aquaculture species (Table 4), we would presume that ingestion of ZEN may affect growth performance, but it depends on species, dose, and duration of exposure, and it can result in complications in broodstocks of farmed species and monosex-cultured species.Scarce information is available on the toxicity of OTA in aquatic species. A significant reduction in weight gain, poorer feed conversion rate, lower survival, and hematocrit was observed in channel catfish fed with OTA-contaminated diets [111]. Furthermore, moderate-to-severe histopathological lesions of the liver and posterior kidney were observed [113]. While a significant decrease in erythrocyte count (RBCs), haemoglobin content (Hb), and haematocrit value (Hct) in Nile tilapia exposed to low OTA level (400 µg·kg−1) was seen, in Nile tilapia exposed to 600 µg·kg−1 diet mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular haemaglobin (MCH), and mean corpuscular haemaglobin concentrate (MCHC) blood indices significantly reduced [136]. In addition, as shown in Table 4, OTA has a negative impact on shrimp even after feeding them with 1000 µg·kg−1 contaminated diet for 8 weeks. However, increasing the dose and exposure duration might affect the shrimp negatively.Other mycotoxins like sterigmatocystin, which is closely related to the aflatoxin as a precursor in aflatoxin biosynthesis and carcinogenic, have been studied in Nile tilapia [115]. Stg has genotoxic and toxicopathological effects in Nile tilapia, [115]. Stg also decreases body weight and increase in frequencies of micronucleated red blood cells (MN RBC) and chromosomal aberrations in the kidney of Nile tilapia [114]. Studies on the effects of ROQ-C on animals and fish are limited; however, CPA has been reported to cause anorexia, diarrhea, pyrexia, dehydration, weight loss, ataxia, immobility, and extensor spasm at the time of death in several animals [33].As shown in Tables3 and 4, different studies highlight that mycotoxins are a serious problem to farmed aquatic species. A majority of these experiments were conducted based on chronic character, contaminated feed as the route of exposure, and several different doses. It is important to maintain standards when performing the experiments in relation to sex, as studies show that male animals are more susceptible to mycotoxin [137], divide the toxicology tests on acute, subchronic, and chronics, and also consider species, age, rearing conditions, route of exposure, and dose according to each type of mycotoxins, mainly to detect toxic effects on fish.


## 6. Synergistic Effect of Mycotoxins in Fish

Mycotoxins often occur concurrently [40]. Thes multiple mycotoxin contaminations in fish feeds are crucial as mycotoxins may toxicologically interact with each other eliciting marked synergistic and additive actions [138] especially between mycotoxins found at high concentrations. This might increase the negative impact of mycotoxins in farmed aquatic species at lower levels than when present in single contamination. There are limited data on toxic effects of mycotoxin mixtures in farmed aquatic species [123]. FB1 was not carcinogenic when rainbow trout was fed at 0, 3.2, 23, or 104 mg·kg−1 FB1 for a total of 34 weeks. But trout-fed FB1 (≥23 mg·kg−1 FB1 for 42 weeks) promoted AFB1-initiated liver tumors; this result also suggests the importance of long-term contamination as a factor influencing the susceptibility of animals. He et al. [139] examined the individual and synergistic effect of DON and AFB1 on primary hepatocytes of common carp and inferred that the toxic effects of the combined mycotoxins were greater than the effects of single mycotoxins. McKean et al. [140] examined the synergistic effects of AFB1 and T-2 toxin in mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis), showing a significant additive interaction in the toxic response to the combination of mycotoxins. The co-occurrence of AF and OTA presents a health risk in fish because of their synergistic and/or additive effects [141]. Critical is that these mycotoxins can potentially be carried over to human food of animal origin and may cause public health threats [141]. To the best of our knowledge, very few studies were carried out for investigating the interacting effects of multimycotoxins in farmed aquatic animals; however, considering the previous studies carried out for other animals [142–144], we could consider that mycotoxin interactions may likewise affect negatively farmed aquatic species.


## 7. Conclusion

This review shows that fish feeds and their ingredients are frequently contaminated with mycotoxigenic fungi and mycotoxins. Ingredients, especially grains and oilseeds, are the main reservoirs for mycotoxins in fish feed. Ingestion of mycotoxin-contaminated feeds can affect fish health and also contributes to the economic loss of the fish farmers. Also, attention should be taken on the possible carryover of mycotoxins from feed ingredients and finished feed to the meat of farmed aquatic animals for human consumption. Hence, it is important to ensure the control of mycotoxin contamination in fish feeds and their ingredients. Use of seed coat with the small, compact grains (wheat, rice, oat, and sorghum) and those encapsulated in hard seed coats (beans and soybeans) might reduce the contamination of mycotoxin in feeds since they are less susceptible to fungal infection and mycotoxin formation than larger grains such as maize. Since mycotoxins are also produced during storage conditions, it will be important to monitor routinely raw materials as well as finished feeds. Awareness and sensitization on proper storage facilities, duration, and condition for feeds and ingredients are recommended to farmers. Antifungal agents should be used to reduce mycotoxin contamination in feed ingredients and finished fish feeds. Further research is needed to test the synergistic effects of mycotoxins when diets are contaminated with more than one mycotoxin.



---

*Source: 6743065-2019-11-11.xml*