# Performance Analysis of Polarization Diversity for Indoor Scenarios at 41.4 GHz and 61.5 GHz

Authors: Ana Vazquez Alejos; Manuel Garcia Sanchez; Iñigo Cuiñas
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

We present the radio channel experiments conducted in indoor scenarios to test the performance of a dual orthogonal polarization scheme in the single-branch receiver end of a mobile system with a centre frequency of 41.4 GHz and 61.5 GHz. The diversity gain has been obtained according to three main combination methods for an outage probability of 1%: signal selection, equal gain combining, and maximal ratio combining. Diversity gain calculated ranges from 0.25 to 4.5 dB, depending on the combination technique used, the radiation pattern, the scenario, and the frequency band. The spatial variation of the cross-polar discrimination factor (XPD) has been estimated. The XPD ranges from 31 dB to 34 dB at 41.4 GHz and between 26 dB and 29 dB for the 61.5 GHz band. From the gain and discrimination results, we evaluated the performance of this scheme to conclude its suitability as either a diversity technique for reducing signal fading, as the 41.4 GHz, or as a method for increasing the link capacity in the 61.5 GHz case.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Different diversity techniques have been reported in the literature [1–3]; nevertheless, the methods consisting of spatial and polarization diversity schemes appear as the most widely used choices to be implemented in mobile wireless communications. The polarization diversity scheme consists of receiving simultaneously the transmitted signals on orthogonally polarized waves with fade-independent characteristics. The diversity gain derived from the adopted combination scheme determines the viability of the system as an applicable diversity technique to provide signal fading mitigation.On the other hand, the dual polarisation technique can also be used to increase the link capacity in terms of number of users that the system can support; this is achieved by providing channels in both polarizations in order to increase the system throughput. For that purpose, the cross-polar discrimination offered by the transmitted signals should have enough power range to counterpart the depolarization that the transmitted waves can undergo due to different propagation mechanisms or atmospheric phenomena, hydrometeors [4] being the main one.In this paper, we introduce a narrowband system provided with a dual linear orthogonal polarization in order to determine the performance of this scheme as either an applicable diversity technique to provide signal fading mitigation or as a viable method to increase the number of users in the system. The measurement experiments were carried out at the centre frequency of 41.4 GHz and 61.5 GHz in an empty indoor scenario, and in the 41.4 GHz case, an experiment was also conducted in a room with furniture. The transmitter and receiver antennas consisted of standard rectangular horns for both narrowband sounder ends. In the first indoor scenario, and only for the 61.5 GHz case, we additionally tested an omnidirectional configuration in the receiver end, which could not be applied in the other cases due to insufficient dynamic range.The spectrum region between 40.5 GHz and 43.5 GHz has been designated in Europe for Multimedia Wireless System [5, 6] to deploy point-to-multipoint fixed broadband wireless access (FBWA). Notwithstanding the possibilities offered by this band, it remains quite unknown and not extensively used in Europe [6, 7]. The initial attention disappeared and was sided by the emerging wireless communications networks operating at 2.4/5.8 GHz and 60 GHz bands, mainly due to their unlicensed feature.The frequency band in the range of 57–64 GHz has been allocated to deploy license-free wireless communications systems with Gigabit data rates that previously could only be accomplished with fibre optic cable [8]. Personal wearable applications are also contemplated in the latter frequency band, which has not been widely used either.The polarization diversity has been contemplated in the regulations [5, 8] as a method to double the number of channels available in a radio communication link. Diversity techniques are also designed to mitigate impairments due interferences and propagation mechanisms. However, in both the 41.4 GHz and 61.5 GHz cases, experimental results regarding the performance of polarization diversity are scarce in the literature, especially for the millimetre frequency bands herein considered. Polarization diversity performance depends on the considered scenarios. So, while it works like space diversity in high-multipath environments such as dense urban [1, 2], it does not offer the same performance if used in an environment without severe multipath, such as the scenarios here presented.Throughout the experiments presented in this paper we analyze the behaviour of the polarization diversity for the millimetre radio channel and indoor scenarios in both senses: as a diversity technique for reducing signal fading and as a method for increasing the link capacity.In Section2, we introduce the narrowband measurements conducted at 41.4 GHz. We describe the sounder utilized as well as the processing performed. The latter consisted of fitting the power decay law with the distance, the estimation of the cross-polar discrimination factor, the calculation of the diversity gain according to three signal combination methods (signal selection, equal gain combining, and maximal ratio combining), and an analysis of the fading correlation. In Section 3, we introduce the experiments carried out for the 61.5 GHz case, with a similar processing. Finally, in Section 4 we offer the conclusions to this paper.


## 2. Measurement Experiments at 41.4 GHz

A narrowband sounder was built up according to the block diagram shown in Figure1. The transmitter block is based on a phase-locked oscillator (PLO) operating at 41.4 GHz. A pure tone of +22 dBm is transmitted by a pyramidal horn with 20 dBi of gain and a beamwidth of 20°. The receiver side is based on a super heterodyne receiver consisting of a waveguide filter, a low-noise amplifier (LNA)- and a mixer. The mixer output is a carrier at an intermediate frequency of 250 MHz that is recorded using a frequency spectrum analyzer, whose configuration is indicated in Table 1. The receiver was also provided with a horn antenna identical to the transmitter one, for the two indoor cases. Unlike in [1], the receiver used here is equipped with only one antenna and one superheterodyne branch. Both directional antennas could be rotated 90° to work with vertical or horizontal polarization. Then, the four different polarization combinations were considered (HH, HV, VV, and VH). These four measurements were taken consecutively, not simultaneously.Table 1
Spectrum analyzer settings.
ParameterValueUnitsFrequency band61.541.4GHzReceiver BW100100KHzVideo BW100100KHzCenter frequency20.10.25GHzSPAN1010MHzTrace501501pointsAveraging5025—Functional diagram of narrowband sounder used at 41.4 GHz experiments: (a) transmitter and (b) receiver.
(a)(b)The narrowband sounder was tested in two rectangular indoor environments under quiescent conditions and without people in the room. This guaranteed that the propagation conditions were the same for the four consecutive measurements. The first scenario consisted of a classroom full of parallel rows of desks, sizing 25 m by 12 m, with concrete walls and windows along three walls. The second scenario was an empty classroom, without any furniture, sizing 9.85 m by 8.76 m, with walls made of brick and windows along one side wall. The separation distance between transmitter and receiver was 13.5–15.5 m for indoor case number 1 and 5.65–7.65 m for indoor case number 2. The antenna height was 1.65 m and 1.52 m, respectively, and in the classroom scenario the receiver antenna was placed on the central desks at a height of 0.65 m.The narrowband sounder’s receiver end is mobile, travelling along a linear track to cover a distance of 285λ (2 m) for both indoor cases number 1 and number 2. The receiver displacement is controlled by a step-by-step motor to assure that the antenna was placed exactly at the same points. At the receiver end, the vertical and horizontal copolar (VV or eθθ; HH or eϕϕ) and cross-polar (VH or eθϕ) signal envelopes are consecutively registered in each λ/2 (3.5 mm) by means of the spectrum analyzer as indicated above. In Figure 2(a), we have illustrated the relative position of the measurement elements (transmitter, receiver, and linear track) in the indoor scenarios herein considered. Figure 2(b) shows a layout of the furniture placement for scenario indoor number 1.(a) geometry of indoor scenarios and relative placement of elements (transmitter, receiver, and linear track). (b) layout of indoor number 1 with details of furniture placement.
(a)(b)By this measurement setup, the polarization diversity could be evaluated with the receiver antenna at exactly the same positions, with no antenna separation. Consequently, the results correspond exclusively to the polarization diversity without any space diversity effect. Space diversity studies can be found in [1, 2]. The configuration introduced in this paper represents a difference with other diversity studies, such as [9] where space and polarization diversity are combined.The results for the spatial fading of the received signal envelopes for copolar and cross-polar components have been represented in Figure3 and Figure 4, respectively. We can observe that a fast fading component is superimposed on the power decay, which is stronger for the furniture room case.Figure 3
Power variation against distance of the copolar received signal envelope at 41.4 GHz and power decay law fitting.Figure 4
Power variation against distance of the cross-polar received signal envelope at 41.4 GHz.


### 2.1. Signal Envelope Power Variation

The variation range of the received signal envelope is 6.5 dB and 3.25 dB, for indoor environments number 1 and number 2, respectively. A larger fast fading was found in furniture-room case due to a stronger multipath situation.The power decay has been fit for these measurements according to a log-distance model law, and the results are shown in Figure3 and Figure 4. The fitting model is described by (1):(1)P(d)=P0+n⋅d:(dBm),
where P is the received power in dBm, P0 is the received power in dBm at a reference distance from the transmitter (13.5 m and 5.65 m for indoor number 1 and indoor number 2, resp.), and n is the power decay exponent in dB/m. The parameters (n,P0) found for the measurement scenarios were (−0.3646, −31.12) for Pθθ indoor case number 1; (−0.3757, −29.565) for Pϕϕ indoor case number 1; (−1.5053, −25.17) for Pθθ indoor case number 2; (−1.6004, −23.81) for Pϕϕ indoor case number 2.


### 2.2. Diversity Gain

In order to estimate the feasible diversity gain, we compare three signal combination methods widely reported in the literature [1, 2]: signal selection (SS) (2), equal gain combining (EGC) (3), and maximal ratio combining (MRC) (4). Given the signal envelopes in two orthogonal polarizations eθθ and eϕϕ, the combined signal, s, according to these combination methods would be(2)s=max⁡{eθθ,eϕϕ},(3)s=0.707⋅(eθθ+eϕϕ),(4)s=eθθ2+eϕϕ2.
We could also select a combination scheme of the received co- and cross-polar signals which is a possible implementation of a polarization diversity scheme, as in [10]; however, it would not have any sense here, given the high values of XPD as shown in Section 2.3.The CDFs of the fast fading around the local mean of the different combined signals were calculated, and results are plotted in Figures5 and 6, altogether with the original CDF of the measured copolar envelopes.Figure 5
CDFs for different combination methods in indoor number 1 scenario at 41.4 GHz.Figure 6
CDFs for different combination methods in indoor number 2 scenario at 41.4 GHz.The CDFs were tested to follow a Rice distribution according to theK-S test. Then, the K factor was estimated according to [11]. For the indoor case number 1, the values found were 5.46 (VV), 4.96 (HH), 4.96 (SS), 5.00 (EGC), and 4.98 (MRC). For the indoor case number 2, the K factor offered the values of 4.81 (VV), 5.02 (HH), 3.99 (SS), 5.75 (EGC), and 5.77 (MRC). The high K values, mainly for indoor case number 2, confirm a weak multipath contribution compared to the one provided by the direct component. Due to the similarity of the eθθ and eϕϕ envelopes, it is reasonable to expect a comparable performance for the MRC and EGC combinations. The Rician K factor values are summarized in Table 2.Table 2
RicianK factor for the diversity gain CDFs.
Frequency band41.4 GHz61.5 GHzCombination methodSSEGCMRCSSEGCMRCIndoor number 1: directive4.965.04.98———Indoor number 2: omni———4.663.183.30Indoor number 2: directive3.994.754.764.855.595.55The performance of these combining techniques was quantified in terms of diversity gain for an outage of 1%. For indoor case number 1, none of the combination cases reduce the fading, due to the large fade correlation between theeθθ and eϕϕ envelopes. If the combination technique is SS, the diversity gain does not exist, resulting in s equal to the signal registered in the H-plane. For indoor case number 2, the diversity gain is less than 0.25 dB if EGC or MRC are used. This result also matches the low multipath present in the empty room scenario.In terms of gain, the improvement achieved by the polarization diversity system at the receiver appears to be not remarkable due to the small signal fading. It appears also not noteworthy in comparison with spatial diversity gains that reach values around 5 dB as reported in [1, 2].


### 2.3. Cross-Polar Discrimination

The cross-polar component represents the depolarization suffered by the wave and is quantified by the cross-polar discrimination factor XPD [10, 12]. The XPD is defined as the ratio of the average power of the incoming envelopes measured in orthogonal polarizations. For the vertical polarization, it is defined as in (5):(5)XPDθ=〈|eθθ|2〉〈|eθϕ|2〉=PθθPθϕ,
and in a similar manner, it is given by (6) for the horizontal case:(6)XPDϕ=〈|eϕϕ|2〉〈|eϕθ|2〉=PϕϕPϕθ.
The XPDθ is 31.69 dB and 32.95 dB for indoor number 1 and number 2 cases, respectively. The XPDϕ is 33.89 dB and 34.21 dB for the same previous cases. In comparison with other values offered in the literature for mobile communications bands [10, 12], these values represent large cross-polar discrimination rate, and it would ensure the reliable operation of a system providing channels in orthogonal polarisations.


### 2.4. Power Fading Correlation

In Table3, we summarize the fading correlation factors for the vertical and the horizontal polarizations: ρθϕ and ρϕθ, respectively. These factors have been estimated as the correlation factor between the copolar Pii and cross-polar Pij power components, according to (7):(7)ρi,j=corrcoef(Pii,Pij),
where the indexes I and j indicate copolar (θθ, ϕϕ) and cross-polar (θϕ, ϕθ) components, for vertical and horizontal polarisations.Table 3
Fading correlation factors.
Parameterρθϕ (VV, VH)ρϕθ (HH, VH)Frequency band61.5 GHz41.4 GHz61.5 GHz41.4 GHzIndoor number 1: directive—0.459—0.438Indoor number 2: omni0.099—0.1249—Indoor number 2: directive0.7190.480.75030.399Generally speaking, results shown in Table3 indicate a not high correlation factor for 41.5 GHz. From results in Table 3, for vertical polarization, we observe a slightly larger correlation factor for the directive indoor case number 2 than for the other cases indicating a lower depolarization in this scenario and case mainly due to the absence of multipath and other propagation impairments.


## 2.1. Signal Envelope Power Variation

The variation range of the received signal envelope is 6.5 dB and 3.25 dB, for indoor environments number 1 and number 2, respectively. A larger fast fading was found in furniture-room case due to a stronger multipath situation.The power decay has been fit for these measurements according to a log-distance model law, and the results are shown in Figure3 and Figure 4. The fitting model is described by (1):(1)P(d)=P0+n⋅d:(dBm),
where P is the received power in dBm, P0 is the received power in dBm at a reference distance from the transmitter (13.5 m and 5.65 m for indoor number 1 and indoor number 2, resp.), and n is the power decay exponent in dB/m. The parameters (n,P0) found for the measurement scenarios were (−0.3646, −31.12) for Pθθ indoor case number 1; (−0.3757, −29.565) for Pϕϕ indoor case number 1; (−1.5053, −25.17) for Pθθ indoor case number 2; (−1.6004, −23.81) for Pϕϕ indoor case number 2.


## 2.2. Diversity Gain

In order to estimate the feasible diversity gain, we compare three signal combination methods widely reported in the literature [1, 2]: signal selection (SS) (2), equal gain combining (EGC) (3), and maximal ratio combining (MRC) (4). Given the signal envelopes in two orthogonal polarizations eθθ and eϕϕ, the combined signal, s, according to these combination methods would be(2)s=max⁡{eθθ,eϕϕ},(3)s=0.707⋅(eθθ+eϕϕ),(4)s=eθθ2+eϕϕ2.
We could also select a combination scheme of the received co- and cross-polar signals which is a possible implementation of a polarization diversity scheme, as in [10]; however, it would not have any sense here, given the high values of XPD as shown in Section 2.3.The CDFs of the fast fading around the local mean of the different combined signals were calculated, and results are plotted in Figures5 and 6, altogether with the original CDF of the measured copolar envelopes.Figure 5
CDFs for different combination methods in indoor number 1 scenario at 41.4 GHz.Figure 6
CDFs for different combination methods in indoor number 2 scenario at 41.4 GHz.The CDFs were tested to follow a Rice distribution according to theK-S test. Then, the K factor was estimated according to [11]. For the indoor case number 1, the values found were 5.46 (VV), 4.96 (HH), 4.96 (SS), 5.00 (EGC), and 4.98 (MRC). For the indoor case number 2, the K factor offered the values of 4.81 (VV), 5.02 (HH), 3.99 (SS), 5.75 (EGC), and 5.77 (MRC). The high K values, mainly for indoor case number 2, confirm a weak multipath contribution compared to the one provided by the direct component. Due to the similarity of the eθθ and eϕϕ envelopes, it is reasonable to expect a comparable performance for the MRC and EGC combinations. The Rician K factor values are summarized in Table 2.Table 2
RicianK factor for the diversity gain CDFs.
Frequency band41.4 GHz61.5 GHzCombination methodSSEGCMRCSSEGCMRCIndoor number 1: directive4.965.04.98———Indoor number 2: omni———4.663.183.30Indoor number 2: directive3.994.754.764.855.595.55The performance of these combining techniques was quantified in terms of diversity gain for an outage of 1%. For indoor case number 1, none of the combination cases reduce the fading, due to the large fade correlation between theeθθ and eϕϕ envelopes. If the combination technique is SS, the diversity gain does not exist, resulting in s equal to the signal registered in the H-plane. For indoor case number 2, the diversity gain is less than 0.25 dB if EGC or MRC are used. This result also matches the low multipath present in the empty room scenario.In terms of gain, the improvement achieved by the polarization diversity system at the receiver appears to be not remarkable due to the small signal fading. It appears also not noteworthy in comparison with spatial diversity gains that reach values around 5 dB as reported in [1, 2].


## 2.3. Cross-Polar Discrimination

The cross-polar component represents the depolarization suffered by the wave and is quantified by the cross-polar discrimination factor XPD [10, 12]. The XPD is defined as the ratio of the average power of the incoming envelopes measured in orthogonal polarizations. For the vertical polarization, it is defined as in (5):(5)XPDθ=〈|eθθ|2〉〈|eθϕ|2〉=PθθPθϕ,
and in a similar manner, it is given by (6) for the horizontal case:(6)XPDϕ=〈|eϕϕ|2〉〈|eϕθ|2〉=PϕϕPϕθ.
The XPDθ is 31.69 dB and 32.95 dB for indoor number 1 and number 2 cases, respectively. The XPDϕ is 33.89 dB and 34.21 dB for the same previous cases. In comparison with other values offered in the literature for mobile communications bands [10, 12], these values represent large cross-polar discrimination rate, and it would ensure the reliable operation of a system providing channels in orthogonal polarisations.


## 2.4. Power Fading Correlation

In Table3, we summarize the fading correlation factors for the vertical and the horizontal polarizations: ρθϕ and ρϕθ, respectively. These factors have been estimated as the correlation factor between the copolar Pii and cross-polar Pij power components, according to (7):(7)ρi,j=corrcoef(Pii,Pij),
where the indexes I and j indicate copolar (θθ, ϕϕ) and cross-polar (θϕ, ϕθ) components, for vertical and horizontal polarisations.Table 3
Fading correlation factors.
Parameterρθϕ (VV, VH)ρϕθ (HH, VH)Frequency band61.5 GHz41.4 GHz61.5 GHz41.4 GHzIndoor number 1: directive—0.459—0.438Indoor number 2: omni0.099—0.1249—Indoor number 2: directive0.7190.480.75030.399Generally speaking, results shown in Table3 indicate a not high correlation factor for 41.5 GHz. From results in Table 3, for vertical polarization, we observe a slightly larger correlation factor for the directive indoor case number 2 than for the other cases indicating a lower depolarization in this scenario and case mainly due to the absence of multipath and other propagation impairments.


## 3. Measurement Experiments at 61.5 GHz

As shown in Figure7, a similar narrowband measurement system was built up. The transmitter consisted of a RF signal generator that generated a 22.55 GHz carrier. This signal was up converted to the 60 GHz band by means of a mixer that was fed with an additional carrier at 38.95 GHz given by a PLO. The 61.5 GHz output signal with a power of +20 dBm was then transmitted by a 20 dBi directional standard horn antenna.Functional diagram of narrowband sounder used at 61.5 GHz experiments: (a) transmitter and (b) receiver.
(a)(b)The receiver end consisted of just one heterodyne branch system based on a LNA and a balanced mixer. The receiver antenna output boosted the LNA; then, using the same 41.4 GHz PLO than that of the system described in Section2, the amplified RF signal was down converted to an intermediate frequency of 20.1 GHz, which was directly captured by a frequency spectrum analyzer. The analyzer main settings are summarized in Table 1. Standard 10 MHz frequency references were also utilized both in the transmitter and receiver ends to provide phase stability.For the receiver antenna, we selected a 20 dBi directional standard horn with a beamwidth of 20°, as in the transmitter end, and also a 2 dBi omnidirectional antenna with a 60° beamwidth in the vertical plane. For the horizontal polarization measurements, the omnidirectional antenna was rotated 90° in a plane perpendicular to the line-of-sight (LoS) direction.The measurement procedure was identical to the described in Section2. The receiver travels along a linear track a distance of 410·λ (2 m). However, only scenario number 2 was chosen for the experiments conducted at 61.5 GHz.


### 3.1. Power Variation of the Signal Envelope

In Figure8, we observe that the variation range of the received signal envelope is 3.5 dB and 9 dB, for directional receiver and for the omnidirectional case, respectively. The power decay with distance was fitted, and the results are shown in Figure 8. The power variation follows a linear distance model as in (1), with P0 the received power in dBm at a reference distance of 5 m from the transmitter. The parameters (n,P0) found were (−1.376, −25.31) for directional Pθθ; (−1.549, −23.96) for directional Pϕϕ; (−1.558, −44.33) for omnidirectional Pθθ; (−1.908, −41.62) for omnidirectional Pϕϕ.Figure 8
Power variation against distance of the copolar received signal envelope in indoor number 2 scenario at 61.5 GHz, and power decay law fitting.The resulting value ofn below the free space value, n=2, has also been reported in the literature at 60 GHz for line-of-sight situations in a laboratory environment [1, 2, 13] and in corridors [14], but also in other propagation experiments in the millimeter wave band [15].


### 3.2. Diversity Gain

The CDFs of the fast fading around the local mean for the three different combined signals (2)–(4) have been calculated, and results are plotted in Figures 9 and 10, as well as the CDF related to the original measured copolar envelopes eθθ and eϕϕ.Figure 9
CDFs for different combination methods in indoor number 2 scenario at 61.5 GHz and directional receiver.Figure 10
CDFs for different combination methods in indoor number 2 scenario at 61.5 GHz and omnidirectional receiver.For the 61.5 GHz experiments, the CDFs also follow a Rice distribution. For the directional case, the values found for the RicianK factor were 4.91 (VV), 6.27 (HH), 4.85 (SS), 5.59 (EGC), and 5.55 (MRC). For the omnidirectional case, the K factor offered the values 2.77 (VV), 5.53 (HH), 4.66 (SS), 3.30 (EGC), and 3.75 (MRC). The high K values confirm the weak multipath compared to the direct contribution, mainly for the directional case. The Rician K factor values are summarized in Table 2.We observe that for the directional case, the diversity gain is not remarkable due to the small signal fading and large fade correlation between the envelopeseθθ and eϕϕ, as explained later in Section 3.4.However, for the omnidirectional case, the diversity gain is larger, especially if SS combination is used. In this case, the diversity gain is 4 dB that represents only a +1 dB larger value than those achieved for EGC and MRC, in the best case that is versus the VV polarization. This value is comparable to the spatial diversity gain reported in [1, 2] that reaches values around 5 dB. For the worst case, measured versus the HH curve, the diversity gain is less than 0.75 dB for EGC and MRC and null for SS.


### 3.3. Cross-Polar Discrimination

The cross-polar components are plotted in Figure11 and summarized in Table 3. Using (5) and (6), the XPDθ results in 26.42 dB and 28.92 dB for directional and omnidirectional cases, respectively. The XPDϕ is 26.82 dB and 29.52 dB in the same previous cases. As in the 41.4 GHz experiments, these values represent large cross-polar discrimination indicating that the polarisation diversity would be more appropriate to provide orthogonal channels than to mitigate the fading.Figure 11
Power variation against distance of the cross-polar received signal envelope in indoor number 2 at 61.5 GHz.


### 3.4. Power Fading Correlation

Generally speaking, the values found for correlation factor at 61.5 GHz are larger than for 41.4 GHz. The results presented in Table3 show a significant difference between both antenna radiation patterns. The lowest factor ρ  is achieved for the omnidirectional case, for both vertical and horizontal polarisations, thus indicating a larger multipath situation for the scenario number 2 than in the directive antenna case.


## 3.1. Power Variation of the Signal Envelope

In Figure8, we observe that the variation range of the received signal envelope is 3.5 dB and 9 dB, for directional receiver and for the omnidirectional case, respectively. The power decay with distance was fitted, and the results are shown in Figure 8. The power variation follows a linear distance model as in (1), with P0 the received power in dBm at a reference distance of 5 m from the transmitter. The parameters (n,P0) found were (−1.376, −25.31) for directional Pθθ; (−1.549, −23.96) for directional Pϕϕ; (−1.558, −44.33) for omnidirectional Pθθ; (−1.908, −41.62) for omnidirectional Pϕϕ.Figure 8
Power variation against distance of the copolar received signal envelope in indoor number 2 scenario at 61.5 GHz, and power decay law fitting.The resulting value ofn below the free space value, n=2, has also been reported in the literature at 60 GHz for line-of-sight situations in a laboratory environment [1, 2, 13] and in corridors [14], but also in other propagation experiments in the millimeter wave band [15].


## 3.2. Diversity Gain

The CDFs of the fast fading around the local mean for the three different combined signals (2)–(4) have been calculated, and results are plotted in Figures 9 and 10, as well as the CDF related to the original measured copolar envelopes eθθ and eϕϕ.Figure 9
CDFs for different combination methods in indoor number 2 scenario at 61.5 GHz and directional receiver.Figure 10
CDFs for different combination methods in indoor number 2 scenario at 61.5 GHz and omnidirectional receiver.For the 61.5 GHz experiments, the CDFs also follow a Rice distribution. For the directional case, the values found for the RicianK factor were 4.91 (VV), 6.27 (HH), 4.85 (SS), 5.59 (EGC), and 5.55 (MRC). For the omnidirectional case, the K factor offered the values 2.77 (VV), 5.53 (HH), 4.66 (SS), 3.30 (EGC), and 3.75 (MRC). The high K values confirm the weak multipath compared to the direct contribution, mainly for the directional case. The Rician K factor values are summarized in Table 2.We observe that for the directional case, the diversity gain is not remarkable due to the small signal fading and large fade correlation between the envelopeseθθ and eϕϕ, as explained later in Section 3.4.However, for the omnidirectional case, the diversity gain is larger, especially if SS combination is used. In this case, the diversity gain is 4 dB that represents only a +1 dB larger value than those achieved for EGC and MRC, in the best case that is versus the VV polarization. This value is comparable to the spatial diversity gain reported in [1, 2] that reaches values around 5 dB. For the worst case, measured versus the HH curve, the diversity gain is less than 0.75 dB for EGC and MRC and null for SS.


## 3.3. Cross-Polar Discrimination

The cross-polar components are plotted in Figure11 and summarized in Table 3. Using (5) and (6), the XPDθ results in 26.42 dB and 28.92 dB for directional and omnidirectional cases, respectively. The XPDϕ is 26.82 dB and 29.52 dB in the same previous cases. As in the 41.4 GHz experiments, these values represent large cross-polar discrimination indicating that the polarisation diversity would be more appropriate to provide orthogonal channels than to mitigate the fading.Figure 11
Power variation against distance of the cross-polar received signal envelope in indoor number 2 at 61.5 GHz.


## 3.4. Power Fading Correlation

Generally speaking, the values found for correlation factor at 61.5 GHz are larger than for 41.4 GHz. The results presented in Table3 show a significant difference between both antenna radiation patterns. The lowest factor ρ  is achieved for the omnidirectional case, for both vertical and horizontal polarisations, thus indicating a larger multipath situation for the scenario number 2 than in the directive antenna case.


## 4. Conclusions

Polarization diversity gain values are similar to the space diversity gain values achieved in high-multipath environments such as dense urban [1, 2, 10, 12, 16]. Consequently polarization diversity may be an alternative choice to space diversity, with the advantage of a more compact receiver configuration, given that the receiver antennas do not need to be separated a specific distance. However, it does not offer the same performance if it is used in an environment without severe multipath, such as the scenarios here presented.The offered XPD values indicate a large fading correlation between copolar and cross-polar envelopes for the indoor scenarios. This fact together to the absence of depolarization mechanisms as hydrometeors indicates that the polarization diversity would not appear useful if used as a fading mitigation technique in indoor environments.In the 41.4 GHz case, the multipath has resulted larger in the furniture scenario, fact verified by the fading range and the RicianK factor of the estimated CDF. But the influence of the multipath on the XPD is less significant, showing that the multipath does not affect severely to the cross-polar component. So we conclude that the dual polarization can be applied in indoor scenarios to increase the number of available channels better as a diversity technique to counterpart the fading mitigation.For the 61.5 GHz omnidirectional case, the outcomes are similar to those achieved at 41.4 GHz, so indicating that the technique can be useful to increase the capacity of the wireless communication system. However, the omnidirectional case indicates that the polarisation diversity can provide a gain comparable to that one given by the spatial diversity technique. In this case, it would be suitable to use the polarisation diversity as a fade mitigation technique than using dual polarization in order to double channel capacity. At the same time, the omnidirectional case shows a XPD value larger than that achieved for the directional case. This latter indicates that the omnidirectional configuration can be considered also to increase the number of channels.The references in literature regarding experimental works on polarisation diversity are scarce, mainly in millimetric bands [6]. However, the results found in this paper agree with other reported in the literature, as aforementioned [1, 2, 6]. The explanation given for the values of power decay fitting factor n below free space is the presence of wave-guiding effects in the propagation environments. Likewise, the Rician factor K values agree with other found in the literature at millimeter wave frequencies under LoS conditions (e.g., [14]). Obviously, the averaging used in the measurement process turns the results here presented into values valid for averaged scenarios [10, p. 300].The study of polarisation diversity for the 40 and 60 GHz bands is important in order to achieve correct antenna design [7, 17], ray tracing, and simulators coverage [18–20], as well as to increase, or even double, the channel capacity [21].Studies of diversity systems at other frequencies, as mobile frequency bands in [9] or millimetre wave band as described in [6], provide different results. This confirms the frequency and environment dependence of the diversity techniques performance.



---

*Source: 681820-2012-05-22.xml*