# Series-Fed Microstrip Array Antenna with Circular Polarization

Authors: Tuan-Yung Han
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

This study proposes a novel 2 × 2 array antenna design with broadband and circularly-polarized (CP) operation. The proposed design uses a simple series-fed network to increase the CP bandwidth without requiring one-by-one adjustment of each array element or a complex feed network. Selecting the appropriate spacing between each array element allows the proposed array antenna to generate CP radiation with a low axial ratio. Experimental results based on a prototype show that this 2 × 2 microstrip array antenna achieves a wide 3 dB axial ratio bandwidth of more than 10%. Simulated data are also provided to confirm the measured results.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Due to their attractive features, such as low profile, light weight, and ease of manufacturing using printed circuit techniques, microstrip array antennas have come into high demand for satellite communication applications. To generate circularly-polarized (CP) radiation from a microstrip array antenna, previous research recommends a simple design method that uses a corporate-fed network [1] to excite each array element simultaneously. To allow each array element to exhibit equal power amplitude and phase distribution, most corporate-fed networks employ transmission lines (of the same length) and power dividers. However, the CP bandwidth of an array antenna design with a corporate-fed network is usually limited to that of a single array element. Thus, previous studies propose the method of applying sequential rotation techniques to the feed network to improve the CP bandwidth of an array antenna effectively [2–4]. Due to the sequentially rotated structure of the feed network (with a single feed point), the phases of the four array elements (2 × 2 array) are usually orientated sequentially at 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270°. This offers an impedance bandwidth approximately three times wider than that of a single array element. In this design, the designated array element can be either linearly polarized (LP) [5] or CP type. If an LP array element is used, the design process of the array antenna (with sequential rotation technique) will be easier than that for the CP array element type. This is because the process of adjusting the CP performance of each array element can be avoided. However, the resulting compound array gain is 3 dB lower than the array using the CP element. Sequential rotation of radiating elements can increase the input impedance bandwidth and polarization purity and achieve a good symmetrical radiation pattern [6]. However, a sequential rotation feed network must provide a delay line to allow various feed point with different phases to connect to each array element. This results in a relatively complicated circuit layout compared to the traditional corporate- or series-fed network. Several studies indicate that a corporate-fed array antenna using sequential rotation techniques [7, 8] can improve the bandwidth of a corporate-fed array antenna and enhance the purity of polarization. However, disadvantages such as a complex feed network still exist, creating the possibility of producing multiple reflections between the element and the feed.This study proposes a novel 2 × 2 CP microstrip array antenna design using series-fed lines. Experimental results show that the proposed array design and one using sequential rotation-fed network achieve similar levels of CP performances, including CP bandwidth and peak gain. Since the proposed array is fed by a simple series-fed network, there is no need for an elaborate phase shifting or power dividing circuit. This study presents both simulated and measured results for the proposed design.


## 2. Array Element Structure

Figure1(a) illustrates the geometry of a single aperture-coupled microstrip antenna. Two orthogonal modes of the antenna can be excited in series by a microstrip feed line through the coupling of the annular-ring slot in the ground plane. Choosing appropriate length (optimum at 11 mm) for the open stub in the feed line allows the antenna to generate good CP radiation. A previous study analyzes the parameters and design procedure of this aperture-coupled microstrip antenna [9]. A prototype was first fabricated according to the dimensions revealed in Figure 1(a). Figure 2 shows the measured results along with the simulated results, which were generated using IE3D software. Experimental results indicate that the CP operating bandwidth of the prototype (also defined as 3 dB axial ratio) is approximately 150 MHz (5.1%) with respect to the center frequency measured at 2950 MHz. Since the prototype is microstrip-fed, it can be arranged in an array element manner.Figure 1
Geometry of the studied microstrip antennas. (a) Single ring-slot-coupled microstrip antenna. (b) 2 × 2 CP microstrip array antenna.Measured and simulated results for the single CP ring-slot-coupled microstrip antenna. (a) Return loss. (b) Axial ratio.
(a)(b)


## 3. New Array Design and Results

Figure1(b) depicts the proposed CP microstrip array antenna. Four ring-slot-coupled microstrip antenna elements were excited through a series-fed network. Simulation results suggest that the element spacing, d, is the dominant parameter to determine the CP performance of the proposed array, and the optimum value is approximately 73 mm for the studied structure (d~0.76λ0, where λ0 is referred to the center frequency of the CP operating bandwidth). To confirm the simulated results, a prototype (Array A) was constructed based on the dimensions presented in Figure 1(b). Two other prototypes, Arrays B and C, using the corporate and sequential rotation feed networks, respectively, were also constructed as references (Figure 3). Except for different feeding networks, the three array prototypes were designed with the same structure, antenna dimensions, and element spacing. Due to the simplicity of series-fed network design, antenna engineers can ignore the process of adjusting the CP characteristics of each array element. However, the complex feed network designs in sequential rotational-fed and corporate-fed array antennas necessitate tuning the CP performance of each array element.Figure 3
Structure of the reference antennas. (a) Corporate feed network, Array B. (b) Sequential rotation feed networks, Array C.Figures4(a) and 4(b) present the measured return loss and axial ratio against frequency for the respective array prototypes. Figure also presents simulated results for Array A, indicating that they agree with the experimental results. These results confirm that all of the tested array prototypes have good impedance matching within their CP operating bandwidths. In addition, the CP bandwidth (4.7%) of Array B is almost the same as that of its array element, and the CP bandwidth (13.8%) of Array C is about three times that of Array B. As for Array A, the CP bandwidth centered at 3110 MHz is approximately 11.5% which is slightly less than that of Array C.Measured results for the three array prototypes;d=73 mm. (a) Return loss. (b) Axial ratio.
(a)(b)Figure5 plots the measured radiation patterns of Array A at 3110 MHz, revealing good left-hand CP (LHCP) radiations in the broadside direction. The main beam tilts slightly (about 3 degrees) to the left side in the x-z plane. This might be because the array elements are not fed with an exactly equal power level. Nevertheless, the measured peak gain of Array A is approximately 12 dBi, which is only 0.3 dB lower than Array C. This small difference might be due to the feeding phase errors of each element. Table 1 summarizes the experimental results of CP performance for all three array prototypes. These results show that the CP bandwidth of Array A is approximately 6.8% larger than that of Array B, and 2.3% smaller than that of Array C. Although array A demonstrates a slightly narrower bandwidth than array C, its peak gain measured in the boresight direction is almost similar (compared to Arrays B and C) at approximately 12 dBi. Array A also possesses a very simple feed network structure that does not require other circuit features, such as phase shifting or power dividing circuits. Thus, Array A is a preferred candidate compared to Array C if a simple feed network structure is required.Table 1
Experimental results for the studied single element and array prototypes.
3 dB axial-ratio bandwidth (MHz, %)CP center frequency (MHz)Peak gain (dBi)Single element150, 5.129507Array A360, 11.5311012Array B140, 4.7298012.4Array C410, 13.8296512.3Radiation patterns of Array A measured at 3110 MHz. (a)x-z plane. (b) y-z plane.
(a)(b)


## 4. Conclusions

This study presents a 2 × 2 circularly polarized microstrip array antenna using a series-fed network. Experimental results indicate that this array has a broad CP operating bandwidth and an acceptable antenna gain. Moreover, the proposed design is relatively simple compared to the traditional array antenna, which uses a corporate or sequential rotation feed network.



---

*Source: 681431-2012-02-09.xml*