# Influence of Binder Types and Temperatures on the Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Cemented Paste Backfill

Authors: Zhaowen Du; Shaojie Chen; Sheng Wang; Rui Liu; Dehao Yao; Hani S. Mitri
Journal: Advances in Civil Engineering
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

In order to study the influence of burial depth or fire on the core area of cemented paste backfill (CPB), the experiment of CPB with different types of binder and temperature was carried out. Three types of binders, red mud (RM), Portland cement (PC), and slag cement (SC), are used and tested at 20°C, 40°C, 60°C, and 80°C. The macroperformance and microstructural evolution of CPB are analyzed using slump, uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results show that the coupled effects of binder type and temperature have a significant impact on the macroscopic performance and microstructural evolution of CPB. The CPB slump prepared with three types of binder meets the production requirement of the mine. Regardless of curing temperature and curing time, the uniaxial compressive strength of CPB samples with PC and SC is much higher than that of CPB samples with red mud. When cured for 12 hours, the uniaxial compressive strength of CPB samples containing PC and SC increases first, then decreases, and finally increases again with the increase of temperature. However, with the increase of temperature, the uniaxial compressive strength of CPB samples containing RM only increases first and then decreases. When the curing temperature is less than 40°C, the main reason for the increase in UCS was attributed to the fact that the temperature increase accelerates the hydration reaction and improves the density of the sample. When the curing temperature is 60°C, the main reason for the decrease in UCS is the formation of the expansive ettringite (AFt) which destroys the internal spatial structure of the sample. When the curing temperature is 80°C, the UCS increases again due to the fact that such high temperature can destroy the crystal structure of AFt and harden the hydration product C-S-H gel.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Cemented paste backfill (CPB) is an environmentally friendly filling material that has attracted increasing attention and has been extensively used by mining operations [1–3]. CPB is essentially made from solid granular waste produced by operations such as milling and coal separation. The benefits of CPB are many including better underground mine stability, control of surface subsidence, and enhanced ore recovery. By using CPB, it is possible to mine under surface infrastructure such as buildings and railways and mine under water [4–6]. CPB used in coal mines is mainly made of binder, fly ash, and coal gangue; its solid content is in the range of 70% to 85%.As one of the components of CPB, binder mainly plays the role of cementation. When the binder is in contact with water, it will undergo hydration reaction and generate hydration products to provide strength for CPB. The cost of binder for coal mines accounts for 90% of the total cost of CPB filling materials (for example, the Xinhe Coal Mine in the Shandong Province in China). Portland cement (PC) has been traditionally used as a binder in proportions that commonly range from 2% to 7% by total weight [7, 8]. However, different types of binders have different prices and cementitious effects. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the influence of different types of binders on the performance of CPB. With the depletion of shallow coal resources in China, the depth of coal mining is increasing every year, and the geothermal problem is becoming increasingly serious. During the process of paste backfill in the mine, the posterior part of the working face is in a completely closed state with poor ventilation. Combined with the influences of rock temperature, air compression and expansion, hydration reaction, and heat generation, the temperature behind the working face can be significantly hot. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct experimental research on the thermal stability of CPB.In recent decades, many scholars have conducted extensive research on the factors influencing the performance of CPB. Wu et al. [9] investigated the effects of three types of binders on CPB, and the results showed that these types of binders had a significant impact on the coagulation performance and compressive strength. Ercikdi et al. [10] investigated the effects of OPC, PCC, and SRC, on the mechanical properties and microstructure of CPB. The results showed that the mechanical properties of CPB were closely related to sulphide-rich tailings. Sun et al. [11] studied the influences of different silica fume proportions as binders on CPB properties, and the results showed that the UCS of CPB samples are largest when the silica fume proportion is 5%. Xu et al. [12] studied the effect of the type of binder on UCS. The results showed that the slag cement (SC) has more advantages than PC and SC with 5 wt % NaOH. Yilmaz et al. [13] studied the effect of curing time and content of different types of binders on the characteristics of CPB samples based on the use of an improved experimental apparatus. The results showed that the effects of different binder types on the mechanical properties of CPB mainly depend on the different consolidation behaviors of different binder types.Previous studies showed that the type of binder has a significant effect on the performance of CPB. However, there are a few studies on the effect of ambient temperature as an influencing factor on the performance of CPB. In addition, some studies only investigated the effect of a single factor on CPB performance [14, 15]. There are no studies on the coupled effects of binder type and temperature on strength development and microstructural evolution of CPB.Therefore, this study investigates the coupled effects of binder type and temperature on strength development and microstructural evolution of CPB. The purpose of this experimental research is to examine (a) whether the CPB containing three types of binder can meet the engineering requirements of paste slump, (b) the influence of binder type and temperature on UCS properties, and (c) the microstructural evolution of CPB.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

#### 2.1.1. Binders

Three types of binders were used in this experiment. These binders are red mud (RM), PC, and SC, as shown in Figure1. The RM used in this experiment was produced by the Bayer process at the Haitao Aluminum Mine in Henan Province, with a density of 3.01 g/cm3 and a specific surface area of 0.48 m2/g. The PC and SC binders were produced by the Yishui Cement Plant in the Shandong Province. Their densities are 3.07 g/cm3 and 3.1 g/cm3, respectively, and their specific surface areas are 0.36 m2/g and 0.39 m2/g, respectively. Their main chemical compositions are shown in Table 1.Figure 1
Three types of binders: (a) red mud, (b) Portland cement, and (c) slag cement.
(a)(b)(c)Table 1
Main chemical constituents of binders (in % weight).
BinderCaOSiO2Al2O3Fe2O3MgORed mud11.2946.0530.546.130.67Portland cement52.4129.1310.381.265.31Slag cement25.287.863.5152.624.02


#### 2.1.2. Fly Ash

The fly ash used in the experiment is grade II fly ash from the Huangdao Power Plant in the Qingdao city in the Shandong Province, with a density of 2.15 g/cm3 and a specific surface area of 0.98 m2/g. And its appearance is light gray. Its main chemical composition is shown in Table 2.Table 2
Main chemical constituents of fly ash.
Element unitSiO2Al2O3Fe2O3CaOMgOBurning lossWeight (%)53.9430.912.386.530.926.34


#### 2.1.3. Coal Gangue

The gangue selected in this experiment comes from solid waste produced in the process of roadway excavation, coal mining, and separation in the Daizhuang Coal Mine at the Zibo Mining Group in the Shandong Province. Its particle size is less than 25 mm. Its chemical properties and particle size are shown in Tables3 and 4.Table 3
Main chemical composition of gangue.
Element unitCaOFe2O3Al2O3SiO2MgOK2OWeight (%)2.364.318.959.11.411.89Table 4
Grain size grading of gangue.
Particle size (mm)+1010-66-33-1.51.5-0TotalWeight (kg)5.264.123.982.364.3420.06Productive rate (%)26.2220.5419.8411.7621.64100.00Accumulated on sieve (%)26.2246.7666.6078.36100.00—


### 2.2. Mixing Procedure and Mix Proportions

Samples used for the experiment are mainly made of RM, PC, SC, fly ash, and gangue. Considering the composition of CPB at Daizhuang Coal Mine of Zibo Mining Bureau of Shandong Province, the Bureau pointed out that when the mix ratio of the binder to fly ash and gangue is 1 : 4:6, the product performance was optimal [16, 17]. In the same way, three types of binders were chosen for the synthesis of samples subject to constant proportion conditions. First, the filling material was mixed and stirred according to the designed proportion. The stirred CPB was then injected into cubic molds of 70.7 mm × 70.7 mm × 70.7 mm. Once shaken and tamped, CPB samples are then placed in constant temperature and humidity chamber to cure for 28 days. After 28 days, the samples were cured at 40°C, 60°C, and 80°C, for 4, 8, and 12 hours, respectively.


### 2.3. Testing Methods

#### 2.3.1. Slump Measurement

Slump is a comprehensive index used to evaluate the transportation performance of CPB in pipeline [18, 19]. In this work, the CPB slump test was conducted in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard C143 [20]. The upper and lower diameters of the slump cone are 100 mm and 200 mm, respectively, and the height is 300 mm. The CPB is poured into the cone, and a shaker is used to ensure complete filling. Once the cone is filled, excess material is removed. The cone is slowly lifted during a 5–10 second period, and the height of the sample is measured.


#### 2.3.2. Testing of Mechanical Properties

The UCS is frequently tested to evaluate the mechanical performance of CPB. UCS tests are relatively inexpensive and can be easily incorporated into routine quality control programs in mines [21, 22]. In the current laboratory investigation, the UCS values of CPB were determined with a Shimazu AG-X250 electric hydraulic pressure-testing machine. The test machine is driven by a servo-controlled motor and loaded with a double screw structure. The test machine can perform a wide variety of mechanical property tests. The precision is ±0.1%, the crosshead stroke measurement resolution is 0.0104 μm, and the effective test width is 595 mm. The speed is 0.01 mm/s in displacement control mode.


#### 2.3.3. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) Experiment

XRD was used to analyze the selected samples to identify characteristic crystalline substances generated by hydration of CPB. The XRD analyses were performed with a Rigaku Ultima IV X-ray diffraction device (radiation, 2θ = 5–80°) with an operating voltage of 40 kV, an emission current of 40 mA, and a step size of 0.02.First, the sample is poured into a mortar and ground into powder. Then, the powder sample is poured into the glass slot and put into the XRD diffractometer. Finally, we set the starting angle to 5°, the ending angle to 60°, and the scanning speed to 8° per minute.


#### 2.3.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Experiment

To observe the morphology and structure of the hydration products of CPB more intuitively, an APREO electron microscope (FEI, USA) was used for high- and low-vacuum scanning. Its high-vacuum resolution is 0.8 nm at 15 kV and 0.8 nm at 1 kV/0.8 nm at 1 kV, and its low-vacuum resolution is 0.9 nm at 500 V.Prior to SEM observations, samples were soaked in anhydrous ethanol to prevent hydration. Then, the sample is processed into a block with a diameter of 10 mm and a height of 5 mm and sprayed with conductive metal. Then, the gold-sprayed sample was placed on the scanning electron microscope (SEM) internal platform, and the sample was sealed and evacuated. Finally, the samples were scanned in different multiples.


## 2.1. Materials

### 2.1.1. Binders

Three types of binders were used in this experiment. These binders are red mud (RM), PC, and SC, as shown in Figure1. The RM used in this experiment was produced by the Bayer process at the Haitao Aluminum Mine in Henan Province, with a density of 3.01 g/cm3 and a specific surface area of 0.48 m2/g. The PC and SC binders were produced by the Yishui Cement Plant in the Shandong Province. Their densities are 3.07 g/cm3 and 3.1 g/cm3, respectively, and their specific surface areas are 0.36 m2/g and 0.39 m2/g, respectively. Their main chemical compositions are shown in Table 1.Figure 1
Three types of binders: (a) red mud, (b) Portland cement, and (c) slag cement.
(a)(b)(c)Table 1
Main chemical constituents of binders (in % weight).
BinderCaOSiO2Al2O3Fe2O3MgORed mud11.2946.0530.546.130.67Portland cement52.4129.1310.381.265.31Slag cement25.287.863.5152.624.02


### 2.1.2. Fly Ash

The fly ash used in the experiment is grade II fly ash from the Huangdao Power Plant in the Qingdao city in the Shandong Province, with a density of 2.15 g/cm3 and a specific surface area of 0.98 m2/g. And its appearance is light gray. Its main chemical composition is shown in Table 2.Table 2
Main chemical constituents of fly ash.
Element unitSiO2Al2O3Fe2O3CaOMgOBurning lossWeight (%)53.9430.912.386.530.926.34


### 2.1.3. Coal Gangue

The gangue selected in this experiment comes from solid waste produced in the process of roadway excavation, coal mining, and separation in the Daizhuang Coal Mine at the Zibo Mining Group in the Shandong Province. Its particle size is less than 25 mm. Its chemical properties and particle size are shown in Tables3 and 4.Table 3
Main chemical composition of gangue.
Element unitCaOFe2O3Al2O3SiO2MgOK2OWeight (%)2.364.318.959.11.411.89Table 4
Grain size grading of gangue.
Particle size (mm)+1010-66-33-1.51.5-0TotalWeight (kg)5.264.123.982.364.3420.06Productive rate (%)26.2220.5419.8411.7621.64100.00Accumulated on sieve (%)26.2246.7666.6078.36100.00—


## 2.1.1. Binders

Three types of binders were used in this experiment. These binders are red mud (RM), PC, and SC, as shown in Figure1. The RM used in this experiment was produced by the Bayer process at the Haitao Aluminum Mine in Henan Province, with a density of 3.01 g/cm3 and a specific surface area of 0.48 m2/g. The PC and SC binders were produced by the Yishui Cement Plant in the Shandong Province. Their densities are 3.07 g/cm3 and 3.1 g/cm3, respectively, and their specific surface areas are 0.36 m2/g and 0.39 m2/g, respectively. Their main chemical compositions are shown in Table 1.Figure 1
Three types of binders: (a) red mud, (b) Portland cement, and (c) slag cement.
(a)(b)(c)Table 1
Main chemical constituents of binders (in % weight).
BinderCaOSiO2Al2O3Fe2O3MgORed mud11.2946.0530.546.130.67Portland cement52.4129.1310.381.265.31Slag cement25.287.863.5152.624.02


## 2.1.2. Fly Ash

The fly ash used in the experiment is grade II fly ash from the Huangdao Power Plant in the Qingdao city in the Shandong Province, with a density of 2.15 g/cm3 and a specific surface area of 0.98 m2/g. And its appearance is light gray. Its main chemical composition is shown in Table 2.Table 2
Main chemical constituents of fly ash.
Element unitSiO2Al2O3Fe2O3CaOMgOBurning lossWeight (%)53.9430.912.386.530.926.34


## 2.1.3. Coal Gangue

The gangue selected in this experiment comes from solid waste produced in the process of roadway excavation, coal mining, and separation in the Daizhuang Coal Mine at the Zibo Mining Group in the Shandong Province. Its particle size is less than 25 mm. Its chemical properties and particle size are shown in Tables3 and 4.Table 3
Main chemical composition of gangue.
Element unitCaOFe2O3Al2O3SiO2MgOK2OWeight (%)2.364.318.959.11.411.89Table 4
Grain size grading of gangue.
Particle size (mm)+1010-66-33-1.51.5-0TotalWeight (kg)5.264.123.982.364.3420.06Productive rate (%)26.2220.5419.8411.7621.64100.00Accumulated on sieve (%)26.2246.7666.6078.36100.00—


## 2.2. Mixing Procedure and Mix Proportions

Samples used for the experiment are mainly made of RM, PC, SC, fly ash, and gangue. Considering the composition of CPB at Daizhuang Coal Mine of Zibo Mining Bureau of Shandong Province, the Bureau pointed out that when the mix ratio of the binder to fly ash and gangue is 1 : 4:6, the product performance was optimal [16, 17]. In the same way, three types of binders were chosen for the synthesis of samples subject to constant proportion conditions. First, the filling material was mixed and stirred according to the designed proportion. The stirred CPB was then injected into cubic molds of 70.7 mm × 70.7 mm × 70.7 mm. Once shaken and tamped, CPB samples are then placed in constant temperature and humidity chamber to cure for 28 days. After 28 days, the samples were cured at 40°C, 60°C, and 80°C, for 4, 8, and 12 hours, respectively.


## 2.3. Testing Methods

### 2.3.1. Slump Measurement

Slump is a comprehensive index used to evaluate the transportation performance of CPB in pipeline [18, 19]. In this work, the CPB slump test was conducted in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard C143 [20]. The upper and lower diameters of the slump cone are 100 mm and 200 mm, respectively, and the height is 300 mm. The CPB is poured into the cone, and a shaker is used to ensure complete filling. Once the cone is filled, excess material is removed. The cone is slowly lifted during a 5–10 second period, and the height of the sample is measured.


### 2.3.2. Testing of Mechanical Properties

The UCS is frequently tested to evaluate the mechanical performance of CPB. UCS tests are relatively inexpensive and can be easily incorporated into routine quality control programs in mines [21, 22]. In the current laboratory investigation, the UCS values of CPB were determined with a Shimazu AG-X250 electric hydraulic pressure-testing machine. The test machine is driven by a servo-controlled motor and loaded with a double screw structure. The test machine can perform a wide variety of mechanical property tests. The precision is ±0.1%, the crosshead stroke measurement resolution is 0.0104 μm, and the effective test width is 595 mm. The speed is 0.01 mm/s in displacement control mode.


### 2.3.3. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) Experiment

XRD was used to analyze the selected samples to identify characteristic crystalline substances generated by hydration of CPB. The XRD analyses were performed with a Rigaku Ultima IV X-ray diffraction device (radiation, 2θ = 5–80°) with an operating voltage of 40 kV, an emission current of 40 mA, and a step size of 0.02.First, the sample is poured into a mortar and ground into powder. Then, the powder sample is poured into the glass slot and put into the XRD diffractometer. Finally, we set the starting angle to 5°, the ending angle to 60°, and the scanning speed to 8° per minute.


### 2.3.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Experiment

To observe the morphology and structure of the hydration products of CPB more intuitively, an APREO electron microscope (FEI, USA) was used for high- and low-vacuum scanning. Its high-vacuum resolution is 0.8 nm at 15 kV and 0.8 nm at 1 kV/0.8 nm at 1 kV, and its low-vacuum resolution is 0.9 nm at 500 V.Prior to SEM observations, samples were soaked in anhydrous ethanol to prevent hydration. Then, the sample is processed into a block with a diameter of 10 mm and a height of 5 mm and sprayed with conductive metal. Then, the gold-sprayed sample was placed on the scanning electron microscope (SEM) internal platform, and the sample was sealed and evacuated. Finally, the samples were scanned in different multiples.


## 2.3.1. Slump Measurement

Slump is a comprehensive index used to evaluate the transportation performance of CPB in pipeline [18, 19]. In this work, the CPB slump test was conducted in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard C143 [20]. The upper and lower diameters of the slump cone are 100 mm and 200 mm, respectively, and the height is 300 mm. The CPB is poured into the cone, and a shaker is used to ensure complete filling. Once the cone is filled, excess material is removed. The cone is slowly lifted during a 5–10 second period, and the height of the sample is measured.


## 2.3.2. Testing of Mechanical Properties

The UCS is frequently tested to evaluate the mechanical performance of CPB. UCS tests are relatively inexpensive and can be easily incorporated into routine quality control programs in mines [21, 22]. In the current laboratory investigation, the UCS values of CPB were determined with a Shimazu AG-X250 electric hydraulic pressure-testing machine. The test machine is driven by a servo-controlled motor and loaded with a double screw structure. The test machine can perform a wide variety of mechanical property tests. The precision is ±0.1%, the crosshead stroke measurement resolution is 0.0104 μm, and the effective test width is 595 mm. The speed is 0.01 mm/s in displacement control mode.


## 2.3.3. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) Experiment

XRD was used to analyze the selected samples to identify characteristic crystalline substances generated by hydration of CPB. The XRD analyses were performed with a Rigaku Ultima IV X-ray diffraction device (radiation, 2θ = 5–80°) with an operating voltage of 40 kV, an emission current of 40 mA, and a step size of 0.02.First, the sample is poured into a mortar and ground into powder. Then, the powder sample is poured into the glass slot and put into the XRD diffractometer. Finally, we set the starting angle to 5°, the ending angle to 60°, and the scanning speed to 8° per minute.


## 2.3.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Experiment

To observe the morphology and structure of the hydration products of CPB more intuitively, an APREO electron microscope (FEI, USA) was used for high- and low-vacuum scanning. Its high-vacuum resolution is 0.8 nm at 15 kV and 0.8 nm at 1 kV/0.8 nm at 1 kV, and its low-vacuum resolution is 0.9 nm at 500 V.Prior to SEM observations, samples were soaked in anhydrous ethanol to prevent hydration. Then, the sample is processed into a block with a diameter of 10 mm and a height of 5 mm and sprayed with conductive metal. Then, the gold-sprayed sample was placed on the scanning electron microscope (SEM) internal platform, and the sample was sealed and evacuated. Finally, the samples were scanned in different multiples.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Effect of Binder Type on Slump Performance

Three slump tests were conducted for each type of CPB, and the difference between the test results was less than 5%. The slump test configuration is shown in Figure2. The average slump test results are reported in Table 5.Figure 2
Slump test configuration.
(a)(b)(c)Table 5
CPB slump test results.
BinderRed mud (RM)Portland cement (PC)Slag cement (SC)Slump22.45 cm22.55 cm25.45 cm


### 3.2. Coupled Effect of Binder Type and Temperature on the UCS

#### 3.2.1. Four-Hour Curing Process

Figure3 shows the UCS test results for different binder CPB types (RM, PC, and SC) after curing for 4 hours at 20°C, 40°C, 60°C, and 80°C. As can be seen, regardless of the curing temperature, the UCS values of CPB samples contained PC and SC are much higher than those of the CPB that contained RM. On the other hand, regardless of the type of binder, higher curing temperature leads to increase in CPB strength, with the exception of the RM samples at 80°C, which gave a UCS value 0.09 MPa, the lowest strength.Figure 3
Effect of binder type and temperature on the UCS of CPB after curing for 4 hours.


#### 3.2.2. Eight-Hour Curing Process

Figure4 shows the UCS test results for different types of binder after curing for 8 hours at different curing temperatures. As shown in Figure 4, the UCS of the RM and PC samples exhibited the same trends; that is, the UCS increased to a peak at 60°C and then decreased at 80°C curing temperature. When the curing temperature was 60°C, the UCS of these two types of samples reached the maximum values of 0.21 MPa and 1.32 MPa, respectively. Compared with the curing temperature of 20°C, the UCS of the samples cured at 60°C, respectively, increased by 29% and 31%. The UCS values of the samples containing SC after curing at 20°C, 40°C, and 60°C for 8 hours exhibited minor differences, ranging from 1.69 to 1.77 MPa. However, when the curing temperature is 80°C, the UCS of SC samples is the highest at 2.25 MPa. Compared with the curing temperature of 20°C, the UCS of SC sample increased by 33%.Figure 4
Effect of binder type and temperature on the UCS of CPB after curing for 8 hours.


#### 3.2.3. Twelve-Hour Curing Process

Figure5 shows the results of UCS tests for different types of binder after curing for 12 hours at 20°C, 40°C, 60°C, and 80°C. As shown in Figure 5, the UCS values of the samples that contain three types of binder after curing for 12 hours at the four curing temperatures exhibit large differences. Like the results of curing after 4 and 8 hours, the UCS values of the CPB samples that contained PC and SC are much higher than those of the RM samples. When the temperature is 80°C, the UCS value of the SC sample is 31.5 times that of the RM sample. At the same time, it can be observed that the SC sample shows an increasing trend followed by a decrease and a final increase at 80°C. The UCS values of the SC samples cured at 20°C and 40°C for 12 hours are 1.69 MPa and 1.72 MPa, respectively. However, it is worth noting that when the curing temperature is 60°C, the UCS value of the SC sample is lowest at 1.39 MPa. In addition, the maximum UCS value of the sample at the curing temperature of 80°C is 2.52 MPa. As the temperature increases, the UCS values of the PC samples increase from 1.01 MPa to 1.28 MPa, then decrease from 1.28 MPa to 1.13 MPa, and finally increase to 1.71 MPa. At the same curing time, the UCS values of all sample types at 40°C, 60°C, and 80°C are higher than those at 20°C, with increases of 26.7%, 11.9%, and 69.3%, respectively. The UCS values of RM samples increase first and then decrease with higher temperature. The UCS values range from 0.08 to 0.21 MPa.Figure 5
Effect of binder type and temperature on the UCS of CPB after curing for 12 hours.


### 3.3. XRD Results

The abovementioned test results have shown that the type of binder, curing temperature, and curing time have significant influence on CPB. Furthermore, a curing time of 12 hours deems more representative than 4 and 8 hours. As can be observed from the UCS results after 12 hours of curing time, some samples showed an increase then a decrease in strength and finally exhibited increase at 80ºC. To better understand the influence of these factors, the phases of CPB samples after 12 hours of curing time were analyzed by XRD.Figure6 shows the XRD patterns of hydration products of CPB with different types of binder after curing at 20°C for 12 hours. As can be seen, the strongest diffraction is silica (SiO2). The appearance of silica’s diffraction peak indicates that the sample still contains numerous silica particles that do not participate in the hydration reaction. The diffraction peaks of silica in PC and SC samples are relatively weak. This indicates that more silica has participated in the hydration reaction to produce more hydration products. At the same time, the diffraction peaks of C-S-H, C-A-H, gypsum, and AFt can also be observed. The appearance of these diffraction peaks indicates that the hydration reaction occurred in the sample during the curing period and corresponding hydration products were generated. It is easy to observe that the diffraction peak of hydration products generated by the PC and SC samples is more (in number) and stronger (in intensity) than those of the RM sample. This indicates that C3S and C3A in the samples containing PC and SC participate in the hydration reaction and produce more C-S-H and calcium aluminate hydrate (C-A-H). However, the sample that yielded the largest number of peaks with the highest C-S-H and AFt diffraction peak intensities is the SC sample.Figure 6
XRD patterns of CPB samples after curing at 20°C for 12 hours: (a) red mud (RM), (b) Portland cement (PC), and (c) slag cement (SC).Figure7 shows the XRD pattern of hydration products of CPB with different types of binder after curing at 40°C for 12 hours. It can be observed from Figure 7 that the diffraction peaks of silica, gypsum, C-S-H, and AFt still appear after the three types of CPBs are cured at 40°C for 12 hours. However, compared with Figure 6, the diffraction peaks of the hydration products of each sample are significantly enhanced, and the diffraction peak of silica is significantly decreased. The results show that the secondary hydration occurs at 40°C and more crystal forms of hydration products are generated. Moreover, the hydration products of the PC and SC samples (Figures 7(b) and 7(c)) are more than those of the RM sample (Figure 7(a)).Figure 7
XRD patterns for CPB samples after curing at 40°C for 12 hours: (a) RM, (b) PC, and (c) SC.Figure8 shows the XRD pattern of hydration products of CPB with different types of binders after curing at 60°C for 12 hours. It can be observed from Figure 8 that the peak diffraction intensity is still associated with silica. In addition to silica, the diffraction peaks of C-S-H, C-A-H, and AFt are also relatively high. At the same time, it is obvious from Figures 8(b) and 7(c) that there are more hydration products, especially AFt. Compared with Figure 7, the XRD peaks of gypsum in Figures 8(b) and 8(c) are weaker, indicating that more gypsum is involved in the secondary hydration reaction to produce more AFt.Figure 8
XRD patterns for CPB samples after curing at 60°C for 12 hours: (a) RM, (b) PC, and (c) SC.Figure9 shows the XRD patterns of hydration products of CPB with different types of binder after curing at 80°C for 12 hours. It can be observed from Figure 9 that the number of hydration products and the diffraction peak strength of the SC sample are larger than those of the PC sample. In turn, the numbers and intensities of PC peaks are larger than those of the RM sample. Figure 9(a) shows that the diffraction peak of the hydration products of the RM samples is weak, indicating that the hydration products are relatively small at 80°C. Figures 9(b) and 9(c) show that the PC and SC samples produce more C-S-H gel after curing at 80°C for 12 hours. However, the AFt diffraction peaks become weaker.Figure 9
XRD patterns of CPB samples after curing at 80°C for 12 hours: (a) RM, (b) PC, and (c) SC.


### 3.4. SEM Results

To observe the internal microstructure of the three types of binder samples more closely, SEM tests were conducted on CPB samples that were cured for 12 hours.Figure10 shows the SEM images at a magnification of 5000 times. The SEM test results show that the microstructure of the three types of binder is different. Figure 10(a) shows that the RM sample has a single internal structure, mainly spherical fly ash. There are also a few C-S-H gel. However, the internal structure of the PC and SC samples is more complex. Figure 10(b) displays the SEM image of the PC sample. As can be observed, there is cotton-like C-S-H gel and acicular Aft. The C-S-H gel and AFt are interlaced in the middle of the raw material. Figure 10(c) shows the SEM image of the SC sample. Overall, there are some smaller voids in the SC sample. However, outside the voids, hydration products, such as C-S-H gel, acicular, and rod-shaped AFt, are observed between the particles of the sample. These hydration products are tightly surrounded by the raw material particles.Figure 10
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of different samples cured at 40°C for 12 hours: (a) RM, (b) PC, and (c) SC.
(a)(b)(c)Figure11 shows the SEM image magnified 5000 times after the samples of the three types of binders were cured at 60°C for 12 hours. Compared with Figure 10(a), the hydration products (C-S-H gel) between the particles in Figure 11(a) are increased considerably. However, it is worth noting that the PC sample in Figure 11(b) has a relatively dense internal structure with virtually no gaps. It is obvious that the hydration products are compact and evenly distributed, and the spaces between the material particles are filled in a large number of hydration products. A thick rod-like substance (AFt) is formed near and in the middle of the C-S-H gel. This thick rod-like AFt breaks the C-S-H gel and is mixed tightly in the C-S-H gel. The results show that the crystal of AFt is relatively coarse and large, and there is not enough space in the sample. Figure 11(c) shows the internal structure of the sample that contains SC. It can be observed from the figure that some voids still exist inside the test piece. However, there are still cotton-like C-S-H gel and rod-like AFt crystals between the raw materials.Figure 11
SEM images of CPB samples cured at 60°C for 12 hours: (a) RM, (b) PC, and (c) SC.
(a)(b)(c)Figure12 shows the SEM images magnified 5000 times after the samples of the three types of binders were cured at 80°C for 12 hours. At 80°C, the hydration products can hardly be observed in the RM sample. However, it is worth noting that most of the AFt in Figures 12(b) and 12(c) has obvious damaged powdery states. In addition, in Figures 12(b) and 12(c), more cotton-like C-S-H gel has coatings with raw material particles.Figure 12
SEM images of different samples cured at 80°C for 12 h: (a) RM, (b) PC, and (c) SC.
(a)(b)(c)


## 3.1. Effect of Binder Type on Slump Performance

Three slump tests were conducted for each type of CPB, and the difference between the test results was less than 5%. The slump test configuration is shown in Figure2. The average slump test results are reported in Table 5.Figure 2
Slump test configuration.
(a)(b)(c)Table 5
CPB slump test results.
BinderRed mud (RM)Portland cement (PC)Slag cement (SC)Slump22.45 cm22.55 cm25.45 cm


## 3.2. Coupled Effect of Binder Type and Temperature on the UCS

### 3.2.1. Four-Hour Curing Process

Figure3 shows the UCS test results for different binder CPB types (RM, PC, and SC) after curing for 4 hours at 20°C, 40°C, 60°C, and 80°C. As can be seen, regardless of the curing temperature, the UCS values of CPB samples contained PC and SC are much higher than those of the CPB that contained RM. On the other hand, regardless of the type of binder, higher curing temperature leads to increase in CPB strength, with the exception of the RM samples at 80°C, which gave a UCS value 0.09 MPa, the lowest strength.Figure 3
Effect of binder type and temperature on the UCS of CPB after curing for 4 hours.


### 3.2.2. Eight-Hour Curing Process

Figure4 shows the UCS test results for different types of binder after curing for 8 hours at different curing temperatures. As shown in Figure 4, the UCS of the RM and PC samples exhibited the same trends; that is, the UCS increased to a peak at 60°C and then decreased at 80°C curing temperature. When the curing temperature was 60°C, the UCS of these two types of samples reached the maximum values of 0.21 MPa and 1.32 MPa, respectively. Compared with the curing temperature of 20°C, the UCS of the samples cured at 60°C, respectively, increased by 29% and 31%. The UCS values of the samples containing SC after curing at 20°C, 40°C, and 60°C for 8 hours exhibited minor differences, ranging from 1.69 to 1.77 MPa. However, when the curing temperature is 80°C, the UCS of SC samples is the highest at 2.25 MPa. Compared with the curing temperature of 20°C, the UCS of SC sample increased by 33%.Figure 4
Effect of binder type and temperature on the UCS of CPB after curing for 8 hours.


### 3.2.3. Twelve-Hour Curing Process

Figure5 shows the results of UCS tests for different types of binder after curing for 12 hours at 20°C, 40°C, 60°C, and 80°C. As shown in Figure 5, the UCS values of the samples that contain three types of binder after curing for 12 hours at the four curing temperatures exhibit large differences. Like the results of curing after 4 and 8 hours, the UCS values of the CPB samples that contained PC and SC are much higher than those of the RM samples. When the temperature is 80°C, the UCS value of the SC sample is 31.5 times that of the RM sample. At the same time, it can be observed that the SC sample shows an increasing trend followed by a decrease and a final increase at 80°C. The UCS values of the SC samples cured at 20°C and 40°C for 12 hours are 1.69 MPa and 1.72 MPa, respectively. However, it is worth noting that when the curing temperature is 60°C, the UCS value of the SC sample is lowest at 1.39 MPa. In addition, the maximum UCS value of the sample at the curing temperature of 80°C is 2.52 MPa. As the temperature increases, the UCS values of the PC samples increase from 1.01 MPa to 1.28 MPa, then decrease from 1.28 MPa to 1.13 MPa, and finally increase to 1.71 MPa. At the same curing time, the UCS values of all sample types at 40°C, 60°C, and 80°C are higher than those at 20°C, with increases of 26.7%, 11.9%, and 69.3%, respectively. The UCS values of RM samples increase first and then decrease with higher temperature. The UCS values range from 0.08 to 0.21 MPa.Figure 5
Effect of binder type and temperature on the UCS of CPB after curing for 12 hours.


## 3.2.1. Four-Hour Curing Process

Figure3 shows the UCS test results for different binder CPB types (RM, PC, and SC) after curing for 4 hours at 20°C, 40°C, 60°C, and 80°C. As can be seen, regardless of the curing temperature, the UCS values of CPB samples contained PC and SC are much higher than those of the CPB that contained RM. On the other hand, regardless of the type of binder, higher curing temperature leads to increase in CPB strength, with the exception of the RM samples at 80°C, which gave a UCS value 0.09 MPa, the lowest strength.Figure 3
Effect of binder type and temperature on the UCS of CPB after curing for 4 hours.


## 3.2.2. Eight-Hour Curing Process

Figure4 shows the UCS test results for different types of binder after curing for 8 hours at different curing temperatures. As shown in Figure 4, the UCS of the RM and PC samples exhibited the same trends; that is, the UCS increased to a peak at 60°C and then decreased at 80°C curing temperature. When the curing temperature was 60°C, the UCS of these two types of samples reached the maximum values of 0.21 MPa and 1.32 MPa, respectively. Compared with the curing temperature of 20°C, the UCS of the samples cured at 60°C, respectively, increased by 29% and 31%. The UCS values of the samples containing SC after curing at 20°C, 40°C, and 60°C for 8 hours exhibited minor differences, ranging from 1.69 to 1.77 MPa. However, when the curing temperature is 80°C, the UCS of SC samples is the highest at 2.25 MPa. Compared with the curing temperature of 20°C, the UCS of SC sample increased by 33%.Figure 4
Effect of binder type and temperature on the UCS of CPB after curing for 8 hours.


## 3.2.3. Twelve-Hour Curing Process

Figure5 shows the results of UCS tests for different types of binder after curing for 12 hours at 20°C, 40°C, 60°C, and 80°C. As shown in Figure 5, the UCS values of the samples that contain three types of binder after curing for 12 hours at the four curing temperatures exhibit large differences. Like the results of curing after 4 and 8 hours, the UCS values of the CPB samples that contained PC and SC are much higher than those of the RM samples. When the temperature is 80°C, the UCS value of the SC sample is 31.5 times that of the RM sample. At the same time, it can be observed that the SC sample shows an increasing trend followed by a decrease and a final increase at 80°C. The UCS values of the SC samples cured at 20°C and 40°C for 12 hours are 1.69 MPa and 1.72 MPa, respectively. However, it is worth noting that when the curing temperature is 60°C, the UCS value of the SC sample is lowest at 1.39 MPa. In addition, the maximum UCS value of the sample at the curing temperature of 80°C is 2.52 MPa. As the temperature increases, the UCS values of the PC samples increase from 1.01 MPa to 1.28 MPa, then decrease from 1.28 MPa to 1.13 MPa, and finally increase to 1.71 MPa. At the same curing time, the UCS values of all sample types at 40°C, 60°C, and 80°C are higher than those at 20°C, with increases of 26.7%, 11.9%, and 69.3%, respectively. The UCS values of RM samples increase first and then decrease with higher temperature. The UCS values range from 0.08 to 0.21 MPa.Figure 5
Effect of binder type and temperature on the UCS of CPB after curing for 12 hours.


## 3.3. XRD Results

The abovementioned test results have shown that the type of binder, curing temperature, and curing time have significant influence on CPB. Furthermore, a curing time of 12 hours deems more representative than 4 and 8 hours. As can be observed from the UCS results after 12 hours of curing time, some samples showed an increase then a decrease in strength and finally exhibited increase at 80ºC. To better understand the influence of these factors, the phases of CPB samples after 12 hours of curing time were analyzed by XRD.Figure6 shows the XRD patterns of hydration products of CPB with different types of binder after curing at 20°C for 12 hours. As can be seen, the strongest diffraction is silica (SiO2). The appearance of silica’s diffraction peak indicates that the sample still contains numerous silica particles that do not participate in the hydration reaction. The diffraction peaks of silica in PC and SC samples are relatively weak. This indicates that more silica has participated in the hydration reaction to produce more hydration products. At the same time, the diffraction peaks of C-S-H, C-A-H, gypsum, and AFt can also be observed. The appearance of these diffraction peaks indicates that the hydration reaction occurred in the sample during the curing period and corresponding hydration products were generated. It is easy to observe that the diffraction peak of hydration products generated by the PC and SC samples is more (in number) and stronger (in intensity) than those of the RM sample. This indicates that C3S and C3A in the samples containing PC and SC participate in the hydration reaction and produce more C-S-H and calcium aluminate hydrate (C-A-H). However, the sample that yielded the largest number of peaks with the highest C-S-H and AFt diffraction peak intensities is the SC sample.Figure 6
XRD patterns of CPB samples after curing at 20°C for 12 hours: (a) red mud (RM), (b) Portland cement (PC), and (c) slag cement (SC).Figure7 shows the XRD pattern of hydration products of CPB with different types of binder after curing at 40°C for 12 hours. It can be observed from Figure 7 that the diffraction peaks of silica, gypsum, C-S-H, and AFt still appear after the three types of CPBs are cured at 40°C for 12 hours. However, compared with Figure 6, the diffraction peaks of the hydration products of each sample are significantly enhanced, and the diffraction peak of silica is significantly decreased. The results show that the secondary hydration occurs at 40°C and more crystal forms of hydration products are generated. Moreover, the hydration products of the PC and SC samples (Figures 7(b) and 7(c)) are more than those of the RM sample (Figure 7(a)).Figure 7
XRD patterns for CPB samples after curing at 40°C for 12 hours: (a) RM, (b) PC, and (c) SC.Figure8 shows the XRD pattern of hydration products of CPB with different types of binders after curing at 60°C for 12 hours. It can be observed from Figure 8 that the peak diffraction intensity is still associated with silica. In addition to silica, the diffraction peaks of C-S-H, C-A-H, and AFt are also relatively high. At the same time, it is obvious from Figures 8(b) and 7(c) that there are more hydration products, especially AFt. Compared with Figure 7, the XRD peaks of gypsum in Figures 8(b) and 8(c) are weaker, indicating that more gypsum is involved in the secondary hydration reaction to produce more AFt.Figure 8
XRD patterns for CPB samples after curing at 60°C for 12 hours: (a) RM, (b) PC, and (c) SC.Figure9 shows the XRD patterns of hydration products of CPB with different types of binder after curing at 80°C for 12 hours. It can be observed from Figure 9 that the number of hydration products and the diffraction peak strength of the SC sample are larger than those of the PC sample. In turn, the numbers and intensities of PC peaks are larger than those of the RM sample. Figure 9(a) shows that the diffraction peak of the hydration products of the RM samples is weak, indicating that the hydration products are relatively small at 80°C. Figures 9(b) and 9(c) show that the PC and SC samples produce more C-S-H gel after curing at 80°C for 12 hours. However, the AFt diffraction peaks become weaker.Figure 9
XRD patterns of CPB samples after curing at 80°C for 12 hours: (a) RM, (b) PC, and (c) SC.


## 3.4. SEM Results

To observe the internal microstructure of the three types of binder samples more closely, SEM tests were conducted on CPB samples that were cured for 12 hours.Figure10 shows the SEM images at a magnification of 5000 times. The SEM test results show that the microstructure of the three types of binder is different. Figure 10(a) shows that the RM sample has a single internal structure, mainly spherical fly ash. There are also a few C-S-H gel. However, the internal structure of the PC and SC samples is more complex. Figure 10(b) displays the SEM image of the PC sample. As can be observed, there is cotton-like C-S-H gel and acicular Aft. The C-S-H gel and AFt are interlaced in the middle of the raw material. Figure 10(c) shows the SEM image of the SC sample. Overall, there are some smaller voids in the SC sample. However, outside the voids, hydration products, such as C-S-H gel, acicular, and rod-shaped AFt, are observed between the particles of the sample. These hydration products are tightly surrounded by the raw material particles.Figure 10
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of different samples cured at 40°C for 12 hours: (a) RM, (b) PC, and (c) SC.
(a)(b)(c)Figure11 shows the SEM image magnified 5000 times after the samples of the three types of binders were cured at 60°C for 12 hours. Compared with Figure 10(a), the hydration products (C-S-H gel) between the particles in Figure 11(a) are increased considerably. However, it is worth noting that the PC sample in Figure 11(b) has a relatively dense internal structure with virtually no gaps. It is obvious that the hydration products are compact and evenly distributed, and the spaces between the material particles are filled in a large number of hydration products. A thick rod-like substance (AFt) is formed near and in the middle of the C-S-H gel. This thick rod-like AFt breaks the C-S-H gel and is mixed tightly in the C-S-H gel. The results show that the crystal of AFt is relatively coarse and large, and there is not enough space in the sample. Figure 11(c) shows the internal structure of the sample that contains SC. It can be observed from the figure that some voids still exist inside the test piece. However, there are still cotton-like C-S-H gel and rod-like AFt crystals between the raw materials.Figure 11
SEM images of CPB samples cured at 60°C for 12 hours: (a) RM, (b) PC, and (c) SC.
(a)(b)(c)Figure12 shows the SEM images magnified 5000 times after the samples of the three types of binders were cured at 80°C for 12 hours. At 80°C, the hydration products can hardly be observed in the RM sample. However, it is worth noting that most of the AFt in Figures 12(b) and 12(c) has obvious damaged powdery states. In addition, in Figures 12(b) and 12(c), more cotton-like C-S-H gel has coatings with raw material particles.Figure 12
SEM images of different samples cured at 80°C for 12 h: (a) RM, (b) PC, and (c) SC.
(a)(b)(c)


## 4. Discussion

The slump test serves as a macro index for evaluating the rheological properties of CPB and is more easily obtained in practice. It can be clearly seen from the results in Table5 that the slump test results of the three types of binders are not significantly different and range from 22.45 cm to 25.45 cm. The results of slump test show that the CPB prepared by these three binders can meet the requirements of mine engineering fluidity [23].Figures3–5 show that the effect of curing temperature on the CPB strength is strongly dependent on the binder type. It is shown that the UCS values of the PC and SC samples are much higher than those of the samples that contain RM mainly because of the cementing performance of the binders in the samples. PC and SC can provide CPB with more raw materials for hydration reactions, such as C3S, C2S, and C3A. The hydration products generated by the hydration reactions of these binders promote the filling materials to bond together, reduce the porosity in CPB, and improve the overall UCS values of the samples [24–31]. At the same time, it can be inferred that the PC sample is more sensitive to temperature than the SC sample.However, regardless of the curing time, the RM sample shows a trend of first increasing and then decreasing as temperature increases. Specifically, the RM sample RM yielded the lowest strength at 80°C. The main reason for this phenomenon is the poor heat resistance of the RM sample. High temperatures are likely to hinder or destroy hydration products, thus resulting in lower UCS values. The most fundamental reason is attributed to the fact that the RM sample cannot continually provide raw materials for hydration reaction. This view is fully supported by the XRD and SEM images shown above.Curing temperature also plays a decisive role in the UCS responses of the samples. When the samples are cured for 12 hours, the UCS values at 40°C are greater than those at 20°C. The increase of UCS can be explained as the rate of temperature increase accelerates the dissolution of the clinker phase, thus accelerating the hydration process of the binder. Accordingly, hydration products (AFt and C-S-H gel) increase as a function of temperature. The formation of these hydration products is conducive to the increase of the CPB strength. C-S-H is the main binding phase of hardened cement. The content of C-S-H gel and AFt increases as a function of the curing temperature. With the increase of curing temperature, the precipitation of hydration products increases, thus resulting in the refinement of the void structure. As a result, the sample has a denser microstructure and a finer pore distribution that improves the strength of CPB.It is interesting to infer (based on In Figure5) that the UCS of PC and SC samples decreases considerably in an environment at 60°C. This is mainly attributed to the fact that the curing temperature of 60°C promotes the formation of more AFt. The AFt generation is considerably larger than the space-bearing capacity of the pores inside the sample. This has led to the expansion of the sample and the decrease of UCS. In addition, AFt itself possesses specific expansibility, and the expansion pressure leads to the decrease of the UCS [32, 33]. AFt can break the flocculent structure of C-S-H and reduce the integrity of C-S-H gel. The XRD pattern in Figure 8 and the SEM image in Figure 11 prove this assertion. However, the production of C-S-H gel also increases as a function of temperature. However, the overall strength of the sample decreases. The results show that AFt production, C-S-H bonding force, and the internal space of the sample have a competitive relationship at specific temperatures.It is worth noting that the UCS values of the samples that contained PC and SC after curing at 80°C for 12 hours increase to 1.71 MPa and 2.52 MPa, respectively. This is mainly attributed to the fact that the curing temperature of 80°C prompted the PC and SC samples to produce more hydration products (C-S-H gel) that are favorable to the strengths of the samples. The XRD diffraction pattern and SEM images confirm this view. It is not difficult to discern from the XRD spectra that the diffraction peak of C-S-H gel increases after curing for 12 hours at 80°C, while the diffraction peak of AFt decreases. SEM images show that the samples show obvious powdery damage after being cured for 12 hours at 80°C. This is mainly because 80°C has exceeded the limit temperature of AFt. In other words, the structure of AFt was destroyed at 80°C [34].The change of the UCS of the sample was closely related to the internal space of the sample, the volume of the crystal, the heat resistance of the crystal, and the hydration raw material provided by the binder. In other words, the UCS of the sample is an index that is affected by many factors. The coupled effect of binder type and temperature on UCS shows that PC and SC binders and temperatures (20°C, 40°C, and 80°C) seem to have positive effects. This discovery is of great significance for mining efficiency and improvement of backfill support. The stability variation of the CPB strength is particularly important for the design of mine filling. This is obviously related to the economic benefits of the mine, and the risk of failure can be reduced by mastering the matching point pair of stability.In addition, we only studied the effect of medium and low temperature on the stability of CPB. When the underground fire occurs, the CPB will be affected by high temperature. It is a new idea to study the stability of CPB near high temperature heat source.


## 5. Conclusions

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of binder type and temperature on the microstructural evolution and macroscopic strength development of CPB. The results provide some new evidence that can contribute to the understanding of the hardening process of CPB with different binder types, namely, RM, PC, and SC, at different temperatures (20°C, 40°C, 60°C, and 80°C). The following conclusions can be drawn from this work:(1)
It is demonstrated that temperature strongly affects the performance of CPB. The UCS values of the SC sample are greater than those of the PC sample; the latter in turn is greater than the RM sample. The UCS of samples mainly depends on whether the binder could provide more raw materials for hydration products. SC and PC can provide an increased number of hydration raw materials (C3A, C3S) for the sample and can produce more hydration products, such as C-S-H gel and AFt. These hydration products fill the inner space structure of the sample and thus improve the compactness and UCS of the sample.(2)
It is found that temperature has positive and negative effects on the UCS of samples. When the samples that contain SC and PC are cured at different temperatures for 12 hours, the UCS of the samples will increase at the beginning, then decrease, and finally increase as a function of temperature. When the curing temperature is ≤40°C, the UCS of the sample is positively related to the temperature mainly because the increase of temperature can accelerate the hydration process of the binder. When the curing temperature is 60°C, the UCS values of the samples decrease. The main reason is attributed to the fact that this temperature promotes the formation of more expansive AFt that has a larger bearing capacity than that of the internal space of the samples. When the curing temperature is 80°C, the strengths of the samples that contain PC and SC increase again. The main reason is that the increased temperature damages the structure of AFt and promotes the hardening of the C-S-H gel. In addition, the UCS of the sample is closely related to the internal space of the sample, the volume of hydration products, the influence of temperature on the hydration products, and the hydration raw materials provided by the binder.



---

*Source: 6652176-2021-03-08.xml*