# A Novel Design of CPW Feed Planar Omnidirectional Circularly Polarized Antenna

Authors: Jiawei Yang; Xi Li; Lin Yang
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

A novel planar omnidirectional circularly polarized (CP) antenna is presented. The omnidirectional circular polarization characteristics of the planar antenna are the result of the combined effect of a planar quasi-magnetic dipole (PQMD) and a printed electric dipole (PED) in this paper. The CP radiation pattern of the proposed antenna can be achieved by distributing appropriate current amplitude and phase to both elements, respectively. A power divider is used to adjust the amplitude and phase relationship between two basic components. In order to achieve a planar structure, coplanar waveguide (CPW) feed is adopted to feed the quasi-magnetic dipole for the first time. The overall electrical size of antenna is 1.61λ × 0.38λ. Finally, the correctness of our theoretical analysis is verified by processing and measuring this antenna. Through the analysis of the measurement results, we have obtained the following conclusions: the operating bandwidth of the proposed antenna obtained by measurement is from 5.67 to 5.86 GHz, in which the reflection coefficient is less than −10 dB and the axial ratio is less than 3 dB. Within the available bandwidth, the proposed antenna achieves omnidirectional radiation characteristics with a gain between 0.89 and 2.48 dBic.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Omnidirectional CP antennas have got more and more attention because such an antenna has CP property and produces omnidirectional radiation pattern. These characteristics can reduce the effect of Faraday rotation and multipath interference on antenna transmission [1]. Besides, the omnidirectional radiation pattern can make one antenna cover a larger area and optimize the system configuration. Hence, a large number of omnidirectional CP antennas are applied to the wireless communication systems [2–4].More and more ways have been put forward to study and design omnidirectional CP antennas over the last few decades [5–8]. The Lindenblad antenna is considered to be the first omnidirectional CP antenna. Up to now, the antenna is still widely used in various fields. Additionally, an outstanding CP antenna has been presented to obtain an ideal omnidirectional pattern [9]. In recent years, various types of antennas have researched on the omnidirectional CP characteristics. The omnidirectional CP antenna in the form of dielectric resonator is reported in [8–10].Most recently, a new omnidirectional CP antenna array is designed by connecting four CP antenna elements and one parallel strip-line feeding network in [11]. Nevertheless, studies [5–11] do not achieve the omnidirectional CP antenna using a planar structure. In contrast to this antenna, in [12], a planar CP antenna with a planar structure and a smaller size using magnetic-electric dipole principle was presented. However, its disadvantage is still obvious. Improper feeding position can cause inconvenient use and deterioration of the performance. Besides, a low-profile omnidirectional CP antenna with planar sector structure is reported in [13]. In addition to complex structure, this antenna has a bigger ground and it cannot be integrated with printed circuit board.In this paper, a novel planar omnidirectional CP antenna is presented. The omnidirectional CP antenna is composed of a PQMD, a PED, and a power divider. Due to the introduction of the power divider, it is more convenient to control the amplitude and phase of the two elements, wherein one port of the power divider is connected to the printed electric dipole and the other port is connected to the quasi-magnetic dipole feeding in the form of CPW. Such a configuration can easily produce an omnidirectional CP radiation pattern. Its advantages are as follows. In the vertical plane, the antenna realizes a planar physical structure. Besides, the feed point at the bottom of the antenna does not affect the characteristic of the antenna. In terms of processing, the antenna is easily machined and easy to integrate with the printed circuit board (PCB). In the following sections, we will give a theoretical analysis and equivalent model of the antenna. Meanwhile, the detailed process of designing and optimizing the antenna is also given. Finally, the comparative analysis is presented at the end.


## 2. Theoretical Analyses and Antenna Design

### 2.1. Theoretical Analyses

As shown in Figure1, the prerequisite for the generation of CP waves by the proposed antenna is to generate two orthogonal waves with 90-degree phase difference. For orthogonal waves, the decisive factor is to keep the equal magnitude condition of Eθ and EΦ in the azimuth plane. As studied in [14], the equivalent source formulation is presented in Figure 1. The proposed antenna is analyzed by combining a PQMD and a PED. The magnetic current at the radiation plane of the rectangular patch can be known as Mz = Aδ (z) (A is known as the magnitude of the magnetic current). The electric current on the microstrip line can be approximately assumed as Jz = Bδ (z) (B is assumed as the magnitude of the electric current).Figure 1
Equivalent model from the view of the proposed antenna.It can be concluded that the field componentEθ is contributed by the magnetic current, whereas the field component EΦ is produced by the electric current. Actually, the generation of the field is coincident with the study in [13], and the far-field radiation pattern generated by the PED is expressed as(1)Eθ=−jk0e−jk0r4πrη0fxcosθcosφ−fmxsinφ.Similarly, the quasi-magnetic dipole placed along thez-axis produces radiation pattern by the aperture of the rectangular patch; its two planes are placed on both sides of the medium. The far-field radiation pattern generated by the PQMD is expressed as(2)Eφ=jk0e−jk0r4πrη0fxsinφ+fmxcosθcosφ.The specific implementation formula for left-hand CP (LHCP) and right-hand CP (RHCP) can be expressed as follows:(3)ELH=12Eθ−jEφ,ERH=12Eθ+jEφ,and AR in the xoy plane is determined as(4)ARdB=20log10EθθEφθ.It is seen that AR is mainly controlled by the amplitude and phase of PQMD and PED.


### 2.2. Physical Structure

The specific structural dimensions are indicated in Figures2(a) and 2(b). The antenna is manufactured on a substrate with a relative permittivity of εr. The outer dimensions of the substrate are Ls×Ws×h. A half-wave printed dipole patch is machined on the substrate. The outer dimensions of the dipole patch are Wd×Ld. There is an Lr×Wr size rectangular patch located at the bottom of the dipole patch. In order to generate an equivalent electronic wall, nine metal vias are placed at the side of the rectangular patch. A power divider is introduced to realize power distribution. One output port is connected to the printing dipole patch, and the other one is connected to the rectangular patch by CPW feeding mode. The distance between the two ports is a wavelength because of the demand for orthogonal phase. The length is analyzed by software TXTline and defined as Lq. At last, a 50 Ω microstrip line connects the two output ports with the length of Lp. At the bottom of the circuit board, a truncated ground is printed on its back side. Detailed dimensions are given in Table 1.Figure 2
Configuration of the proposed antenna: (a) the top patch and (b) the printed dipole patch and the rectangular patch.
(a)(b)Table 1
Design parameters of the proposed omnidirectional antenna.
ParameterValueParameterValueWs20 mmLq34.5 mmLs84 mmLg10 mmWd2.2 mmW10.73 mmLd13.35 mmS1 mmWr8.26 mmd0.6 mmLr31 mmh1mmLp33.62 mmεr2.65


## 2.1. Theoretical Analyses

As shown in Figure1, the prerequisite for the generation of CP waves by the proposed antenna is to generate two orthogonal waves with 90-degree phase difference. For orthogonal waves, the decisive factor is to keep the equal magnitude condition of Eθ and EΦ in the azimuth plane. As studied in [14], the equivalent source formulation is presented in Figure 1. The proposed antenna is analyzed by combining a PQMD and a PED. The magnetic current at the radiation plane of the rectangular patch can be known as Mz = Aδ (z) (A is known as the magnitude of the magnetic current). The electric current on the microstrip line can be approximately assumed as Jz = Bδ (z) (B is assumed as the magnitude of the electric current).Figure 1
Equivalent model from the view of the proposed antenna.It can be concluded that the field componentEθ is contributed by the magnetic current, whereas the field component EΦ is produced by the electric current. Actually, the generation of the field is coincident with the study in [13], and the far-field radiation pattern generated by the PED is expressed as(1)Eθ=−jk0e−jk0r4πrη0fxcosθcosφ−fmxsinφ.Similarly, the quasi-magnetic dipole placed along thez-axis produces radiation pattern by the aperture of the rectangular patch; its two planes are placed on both sides of the medium. The far-field radiation pattern generated by the PQMD is expressed as(2)Eφ=jk0e−jk0r4πrη0fxsinφ+fmxcosθcosφ.The specific implementation formula for left-hand CP (LHCP) and right-hand CP (RHCP) can be expressed as follows:(3)ELH=12Eθ−jEφ,ERH=12Eθ+jEφ,and AR in the xoy plane is determined as(4)ARdB=20log10EθθEφθ.It is seen that AR is mainly controlled by the amplitude and phase of PQMD and PED.


## 2.2. Physical Structure

The specific structural dimensions are indicated in Figures2(a) and 2(b). The antenna is manufactured on a substrate with a relative permittivity of εr. The outer dimensions of the substrate are Ls×Ws×h. A half-wave printed dipole patch is machined on the substrate. The outer dimensions of the dipole patch are Wd×Ld. There is an Lr×Wr size rectangular patch located at the bottom of the dipole patch. In order to generate an equivalent electronic wall, nine metal vias are placed at the side of the rectangular patch. A power divider is introduced to realize power distribution. One output port is connected to the printing dipole patch, and the other one is connected to the rectangular patch by CPW feeding mode. The distance between the two ports is a wavelength because of the demand for orthogonal phase. The length is analyzed by software TXTline and defined as Lq. At last, a 50 Ω microstrip line connects the two output ports with the length of Lp. At the bottom of the circuit board, a truncated ground is printed on its back side. Detailed dimensions are given in Table 1.Figure 2
Configuration of the proposed antenna: (a) the top patch and (b) the printed dipole patch and the rectangular patch.
(a)(b)Table 1
Design parameters of the proposed omnidirectional antenna.
ParameterValueParameterValueWs20 mmLq34.5 mmLs84 mmLg10 mmWd2.2 mmW10.73 mmLd13.35 mmS1 mmWr8.26 mmd0.6 mmLr31 mmh1mmLp33.62 mmεr2.65


## 3. Parametric Studies

In this section, in order to achieve a more in-depth understanding of the working principle, we have conducted a series of parameter comparisons to understand the effect of the relevant dimensions on the antenna performance. The parameters of main concern are the length of the printed dipole patch (Ld), the width of the rectangular patch (Lr), and the distance between the rectangular patch and printed dipole patch (Lq). They are chosen because they are important in designing the proposed antenna. Ansoft High-Frequency Structure Simulator software is used to analyze these parameters.


### 3.1. Printing Dipole Parameter Optimization

According to the theoretical analyses, the length of the dipole patch is about half a wavelength because the dipole patch is connected partly to the substrate with a relative permittivity ofεr and partly to the air; we can conclude that the length of the dipole patch can be initially set to a value in the middle of these two sizes. Figure 3 presents the variation of reflection coefficients and AR under three different printed dipole patch lengths.Figure 3
The influence of parameter Ld on antenna performance.
(a)(b)Both the reflection coefficients and AR are sensitive to the length of Ld. It is observed that the resonant frequency of the proposed antenna is shifted to the low frequency with the increasing size of Ld. As for AR, medium value can get an ideal AR effect. When Ld is equal to 13, the antenna will produce an ideal resonant frequency and have a lowest AR in azimuth plane.


### 3.2. Rectangular Patch Parameter Optimization

The changes of Lr affects the reflection coefficient and AR that are presented in Figure4. As can be seen, Ld and Lr have a similar effect on the resonant frequency of the antenna. Compared with the effect of Ld, the width of the rectangular patch Lr has a bigger influence on AR. It is observed that the resonant frequency appears at 5.8 GHz and AR is the lowest for Lr = 8.26 mm. Hence, the value Lr = 8.26 mm can be viewed as a final value for the proposed antenna.Figure 4
The influence of parameter Lr on antenna performance.
(a)(b)


### 3.3. Phase Delay Line

Figure5 shows the effects of Lq on the reflection coefficient and AR. As predicted, AR will deteriorate as the phase changes. It is preferred to adopt a wavelength phase delay line to ensure the phase relationships between the two elements. Meanwhile, its characteristic impedance should always remain at 100 ohms because the input impedance of PQMD and PED is 100 ohms. In this case, input port can match 50 ohms.Figure 5
The influence of parameter Lq on antenna performance.
(a)(b)In conclusion, the AR of radiation pattern is mainly controlled by Ld, Lr, and Lq. The critical dimension of the controlling operation frequency is Ld and Lr. When the PED and PQMD are in the resonant case, Lq will be the most important parameter in the designing process by controlling the phase.


## 3.1. Printing Dipole Parameter Optimization

According to the theoretical analyses, the length of the dipole patch is about half a wavelength because the dipole patch is connected partly to the substrate with a relative permittivity ofεr and partly to the air; we can conclude that the length of the dipole patch can be initially set to a value in the middle of these two sizes. Figure 3 presents the variation of reflection coefficients and AR under three different printed dipole patch lengths.Figure 3
The influence of parameter Ld on antenna performance.
(a)(b)Both the reflection coefficients and AR are sensitive to the length of Ld. It is observed that the resonant frequency of the proposed antenna is shifted to the low frequency with the increasing size of Ld. As for AR, medium value can get an ideal AR effect. When Ld is equal to 13, the antenna will produce an ideal resonant frequency and have a lowest AR in azimuth plane.


## 3.2. Rectangular Patch Parameter Optimization

The changes of Lr affects the reflection coefficient and AR that are presented in Figure4. As can be seen, Ld and Lr have a similar effect on the resonant frequency of the antenna. Compared with the effect of Ld, the width of the rectangular patch Lr has a bigger influence on AR. It is observed that the resonant frequency appears at 5.8 GHz and AR is the lowest for Lr = 8.26 mm. Hence, the value Lr = 8.26 mm can be viewed as a final value for the proposed antenna.Figure 4
The influence of parameter Lr on antenna performance.
(a)(b)


## 3.3. Phase Delay Line

Figure5 shows the effects of Lq on the reflection coefficient and AR. As predicted, AR will deteriorate as the phase changes. It is preferred to adopt a wavelength phase delay line to ensure the phase relationships between the two elements. Meanwhile, its characteristic impedance should always remain at 100 ohms because the input impedance of PQMD and PED is 100 ohms. In this case, input port can match 50 ohms.Figure 5
The influence of parameter Lq on antenna performance.
(a)(b)In conclusion, the AR of radiation pattern is mainly controlled by Ld, Lr, and Lq. The critical dimension of the controlling operation frequency is Ld and Lr. When the PED and PQMD are in the resonant case, Lq will be the most important parameter in the designing process by controlling the phase.


## 4. Experimental Verification

The proposed antenna in this paper working at 5.8 GHz is manufactured by utilizing printed circuit board (PCB) technology. Figure6 shows the physical image of the proposed antenna. Using Agilent's Vector Network Analyzer as a measuring instrument, the measured reflection coefficient is presented in Figure 7(a). It can be observed that the measured result is close to the simulated one, while there still exists a slight frequency drift; it may be caused by the dielectric constant offset used in the manufacture and the accuracy of the microstrip line processing dimensions.Figure 6
The fabricated antenna: (a) top view; (b) bottom view.
(a)(b)Figure 7
Reflection coefficient and axial ratios.
(a)(b)It can be seen that AR varies with frequency in Figure7(b). The measured result presents that the proposed antenna has an AR below 3 dB in the azimuth plane in the band from 5.67 GHz to 5.87 GHz. From the figure, we can also see that AR is not better than the simulation. Fortunately, within the effective bandwidth, we have successfully achieved an AR less than 3 dB in the azimuth plane.The far-field patterns in the elevation and azimuth plane at 5.8 GHz are shown in Figures8(a) and 8(b). It can be observed that the proposed antenna achieves an omnidirectional LHCP pattern with an out-of-roundness less than 3 dB in the azimuth plane. The consistency of the measurement results and the simulation results is not strong. The difference between them is mainly due to the unsatisfactory measurement environment. Luckily, within the effective bandwidth, measurement results have reached the design requirements in terms of out-of-roundness and AR.Figure 8
Simulated and measured radiation patterns at 5.8 GHz in the (a) azimuth plane and (b) elevation plane.
(a)(b)The maximum gain and radiation efficiency at each frequency point are presented in Figure9. The proposed antenna has a gain between 0.89 and 2.48 dBic within the entire measurement bandwidth. Except for gain, Figure 9 also presents the radiation efficiency of the proposed antenna. Within the effective bandwidth, the simulated radiation efficiency of the proposed omnidirectional CP antenna is more than 94%. The measured radiation efficiency of the proposed omnidirectional CP antenna is between 92.8% and 94.7%. From the above expression, we can see that simulated radiation efficiency is higher than the measurement; the reason may be that the simulation software is not accurate for the calculation of conductor loss.Figure 9
Simulated and measured LHCP gain and radiation efficiency.


## 5. Conclusion

In this paper, a novel planar omnidirectional circularly polarized (CP) antenna is presented. The antenna combines a planar quasi-magnetic dipole and a printed electric dipole, and their connection is achieved by power divider. It is worth mentioning that the CPW feed is adopted to feed the quasi-magnetic dipole for the first time so as to achieve a planar structure. The proposed antenna can be easily integrated with the PCB and can form an array by using the CPW feed technology. The radiation principle of the antenna can be considered as producing a magnetic current and an electric current. The CP radiation pattern is formed by adjusting the proper amplitude and phase of the electric current and magnetic current. The proposed antenna was designed, processed, and tested. Measured impedance bandwidth of the proposed antenna is 3.3% (5.67–5.86 GHz). Within the entire measurement bandwidth, the omnidirectional CP radiation pattern is achieved and the proposed antenna meets design requirements. The proposed antenna can be a good candidate for WLAN application.



---

*Source: 6695966-2021-03-28.xml*