# Prevalence of Undernutrition and Associated Factors among Lactating Mothers of Angecha District, Kembata Tembaro Zone, Southern Ethiopia

Authors: Moges Muluneh Boke; Aman Yesuf; Befikadu Tariku Gutema
Journal: Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

Background. Major reasons for malnutrition, particularly among those who live in low- and middle-income countries, are physiological vulnerability and inadequate intake. The objective of the study was to assess the prevalence of undernutrition and associated factors among lactating mothers of Angecha District, Southern Ethiopia. Methods. A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among randomly selected lactating mothers in Angecha District from March to April 2017. A pretested structured questionnaire was used to assess the prevalence of undernutrition and associated factors among lactating mothers. Undernutrition was defined as the body mass index of less than 18.5 kg/m2. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted, and the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) at a p value less than 0.05 was used to determine a statistically significant association between predictors and outcome variables. Result. The prevalence of undernutrition among lactating mothers was 21.2% (95% CI: 17.52, 25.46). The odds of undernutrition were higher among lactating mothers in the younger age group (AOR 4.12 (95% CI: 1.25–13.63), compared to 36–49 years group), dietary diversity less than five food groups (AOR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.35–4.36), and not attending antenatal care (ANC) (AOR 2.90 (95% CI: 1.43–5.86), compared to those who attended ANC for 4 or more times). The odds of undernutrition among lactating women from 3rd quantile wealth index households reduced by nearly half (AOR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.23–0.98) compared to lactating mothers from 1st quantile wealth index households. Conclusion. Nearly one in every five lactating mothers was undernourished. Age, dietary diversity score, ANC visit, and wealth index were found to be the associated factors of undernutrition. Therefore, due attention should have to be given to increase the use of ANC.


---

## Body

## 1. Background

Nutrition has a fundamental role in human life, health, and development throughout the entire lifespan, and its deficiency is prevalent in many countries [1, 2]. In low- and middle-income countries, maternal and child undernutrition related mortality and morbidity remain inescapable. Undernutrition is the underlying cause of 20% of maternal death and prevalent among lactating women in many regions of the world. In most countries, maternal undernutrition (BMI less than 18.5 kg/m2) ranges from 10% to 19% [2–4]. A serious problem of maternal undernutrition was marked in most Sub-Saharan Africa countries, where two in every 10 women were undernourished [5]. Similarly, a report based on Ethiopian DHS 2016 showed that two in every ten women suffered from undernutrition in Ethiopia [6].Maternal nutrition is important to child survival and development [7]. Lactating mothers’ nutritional status and intake determine some of the nutritional components of breast milk and child nutritional status as evidence revealed that nutrient content, specifically the concentrations of fatty acids, iodine, fat, vitamin A, thiamin, and cobalamin, depends on corresponding dietary intakes of these nutrients in the maternal diet and lactating women’s nutritional status [8–11]. Inadequate intake of food and nutrients risks maternal depletion. Therefore, lactating mothers have to increase their intake to prevent maternal depletion and to produce adequate milk for the infant [7, 12, 13]. The major reasons for women’s malnutrition, particularly among those who live in low- and middle-income countries, are physiological vulnerability and inadequate intake of food [14].Ethiopia has been implementing different policies and programs including the expansion of health and nutrition services to the community. Moreover, lactating mothers’ undernutrition remains a persistent problem in low- and middle-income countries including Ethiopia due to different reasons [5, 6]. The National Nutritional Strategy and Program of Ethiopia considers lactating mothers as a vulnerable group for malnutrition and gives priorities for nutrition related intervention. One of the initiatives of the program is to improve the nutrition of pregnant and lactating women [15, 16]. The Seqota declaration, a commitment by the Government of Ethiopia to end child undernutrition in Ethiopia by 2030, considers pregnant and lactating mothers as a target group for the implementation [17]. Despite the implementation of the interventions, evidence related to lactating mothers’ undernutrition is limited in Ethiopia. Therefore, the aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of undernutrition and associated factors among lactating mothers of Angecha District, Southern Ethiopia.


## 2. Methods and Materials

### 2.1. Study Setting and Area

The study was conducted in Angecha District, Kembata Tembaro Zone, Southern Ethiopia. The administrative center of the district is Angecha town, which is located 255 km to the South of Addis Ababa, the capital city of Ethiopia. According to the Central Statistical Agency population projection for Ethiopia, in 2016, the total population of the district was 94,978 [18] and the district health office report showed that there are 20 health posts and 5 health centers.


### 2.2. Study Design, Period, and Population

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from March to April 2017. The inclusion criteria for the study population were lactating mothers whose child’s age was less than 2 years and who lived in the study area for more than 6 months. Based on the review of the health posts’ record, 2,825 eligible lactating women were identified.


### 2.3. Sample Size Determination and Procedures

To determine the sample size of the study, single population proportion formula was used with the assumption of 95% confidence level, 5% margin of error, 25% estimated prevalence of undernutrition among lactating mothers [19], and 10% nonresponse rate. Then the total sample size was 414. To use a simple random sampling technique, a sampling frame was prepared by reviewing the health posts’ family folders and records from all 20 kebeles of the district. To follow a simple random sampling technique, a computer-generated random number was used to select the mothers.


### 2.4. Data Collection Tools and Procedure

Data was collected through a home-to-home visit using a structured and pretested interviewer-administered paper-based questionnaire and measurements. Socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, antenatal care (ANC) utilization, gravidity, maternal and child feeding practice, environmental health condition of the household, household food security, and wealth status were the components of the questionnaire. Household food insecurity access scale (HFIAS) was used to assess the food security status of the households, which was developed by the Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance [20]. The mother’s dietary diversity was measured by the recall of all food consumed by the mother during the previous 24 hours, which is according to the Food and Agricultural Organization’s (FAO’s) guideline for measuring household and individual dietary diversity [21]. Nutrition knowledge was measured using questions that are developed for assessing the practical nutrition knowledge of the lactating mothers. Wealth index questions were obtained from the Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey, which was based on the household ownership of the productive asset and household characteristics [6]. In addition, the weight and height of the mothers were measured. The weight of the mothers was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg on a battery-powered digital scale. The height of the mothers was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a wooden height-measuring board with a sliding head bar following standard anthropometric techniques [22].


### 2.5. Data Quality Control

The questionnaire was initially developed in English and translated into Kambatic (local) language. Residents who completed high school and were fluent in speaking and writing of Kambatic language were recruited for data collection, and nurses were recruited for supervision. The training was given for two days by the investigator. The questionnaire was retranslated back to English by an individual who was blind to the original English version for checking consistency. Pretest of the questionnaire was employed prior to the actual data collection period on 5% of the sample size, and modification was made based on the finding. The functionality of digital weight scales was checked using known weight every morning before data collection began, and the data collectors were assured that the scale reading is exactly at zero before every weight measurement. Supervision was done by the investigator and supervisors, and they checked the collected data for completeness, accuracy, and consistency throughout the data collection period.


### 2.6. Variables

The independent variables include sociodemographic characteristics of the mother and head of the household, family size, source of water for the household, dietary diversity of the mother, frequency of breastfeeding, age of introduction of complementary food for the child and its frequency, cultural avoided food, and nutritional knowledge of the mother. After generating the number of diversified food types consumed by the mothers using FAO’s manual [21], the dietary diversity score was calculated and the mean score (4.5 food groups) was used to classify low and high diversity. Nutrition knowledge index categories were generated based on the proportion of questions correctly responded to by the three groups. In addition, household food insecure level and wealth index were also included. The HFIAS category was calculated, and households’ food security status was categorized into four based on the Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance manual [20]. Wealth index was generated using a principal component factor analysis based on the household ownership of the productive asset and household characteristics and categorized into three quantiles [6]. The dependent variable is body mass index (BMI) which was categorized as undernutrition for those with less than 18.5 kg/m2.


### 2.7. Data Analysis

All the questionnaires were checked visually, coded, and entered into Epi info version 3.5.4 and imported to SPSS Version 20.0 software package for analysis. To assess the presence of an association between dependent and independent variables, bivariate analysis was done. Variables with ap value of less than 0.20 were entered into multiple logistic regression model to identify the independent predictors of undernutrition of lactating mothers. The presence of an association between independent and dependent variables using multiple logistic regression model was assessed by using an odds ratio of a p value of less than 0.05. For the assessment of multicollinearity, variable inflation factors were used. The fitness of the model was tested by Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness of fit test and the test revealed a p value of 0.289.


### 2.8. Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from Institutional Review Board of Arba Minch University (ሕጤሳኮ/4284/54; Date 11/02/2009 EC). Permission to conduct the study was obtained from Angecha District Health Office. Verbal informed consent was obtained from each study participant before the interviews and measurement. The privacy of the study participants was maintained by interviewing the mother alone. The interview was conducted by the data collector alone and sometimes with the presence of the supervisor.


## 2.1. Study Setting and Area

The study was conducted in Angecha District, Kembata Tembaro Zone, Southern Ethiopia. The administrative center of the district is Angecha town, which is located 255 km to the South of Addis Ababa, the capital city of Ethiopia. According to the Central Statistical Agency population projection for Ethiopia, in 2016, the total population of the district was 94,978 [18] and the district health office report showed that there are 20 health posts and 5 health centers.


## 2.2. Study Design, Period, and Population

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from March to April 2017. The inclusion criteria for the study population were lactating mothers whose child’s age was less than 2 years and who lived in the study area for more than 6 months. Based on the review of the health posts’ record, 2,825 eligible lactating women were identified.


## 2.3. Sample Size Determination and Procedures

To determine the sample size of the study, single population proportion formula was used with the assumption of 95% confidence level, 5% margin of error, 25% estimated prevalence of undernutrition among lactating mothers [19], and 10% nonresponse rate. Then the total sample size was 414. To use a simple random sampling technique, a sampling frame was prepared by reviewing the health posts’ family folders and records from all 20 kebeles of the district. To follow a simple random sampling technique, a computer-generated random number was used to select the mothers.


## 2.4. Data Collection Tools and Procedure

Data was collected through a home-to-home visit using a structured and pretested interviewer-administered paper-based questionnaire and measurements. Socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, antenatal care (ANC) utilization, gravidity, maternal and child feeding practice, environmental health condition of the household, household food security, and wealth status were the components of the questionnaire. Household food insecurity access scale (HFIAS) was used to assess the food security status of the households, which was developed by the Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance [20]. The mother’s dietary diversity was measured by the recall of all food consumed by the mother during the previous 24 hours, which is according to the Food and Agricultural Organization’s (FAO’s) guideline for measuring household and individual dietary diversity [21]. Nutrition knowledge was measured using questions that are developed for assessing the practical nutrition knowledge of the lactating mothers. Wealth index questions were obtained from the Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey, which was based on the household ownership of the productive asset and household characteristics [6]. In addition, the weight and height of the mothers were measured. The weight of the mothers was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg on a battery-powered digital scale. The height of the mothers was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a wooden height-measuring board with a sliding head bar following standard anthropometric techniques [22].


## 2.5. Data Quality Control

The questionnaire was initially developed in English and translated into Kambatic (local) language. Residents who completed high school and were fluent in speaking and writing of Kambatic language were recruited for data collection, and nurses were recruited for supervision. The training was given for two days by the investigator. The questionnaire was retranslated back to English by an individual who was blind to the original English version for checking consistency. Pretest of the questionnaire was employed prior to the actual data collection period on 5% of the sample size, and modification was made based on the finding. The functionality of digital weight scales was checked using known weight every morning before data collection began, and the data collectors were assured that the scale reading is exactly at zero before every weight measurement. Supervision was done by the investigator and supervisors, and they checked the collected data for completeness, accuracy, and consistency throughout the data collection period.


## 2.6. Variables

The independent variables include sociodemographic characteristics of the mother and head of the household, family size, source of water for the household, dietary diversity of the mother, frequency of breastfeeding, age of introduction of complementary food for the child and its frequency, cultural avoided food, and nutritional knowledge of the mother. After generating the number of diversified food types consumed by the mothers using FAO’s manual [21], the dietary diversity score was calculated and the mean score (4.5 food groups) was used to classify low and high diversity. Nutrition knowledge index categories were generated based on the proportion of questions correctly responded to by the three groups. In addition, household food insecure level and wealth index were also included. The HFIAS category was calculated, and households’ food security status was categorized into four based on the Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance manual [20]. Wealth index was generated using a principal component factor analysis based on the household ownership of the productive asset and household characteristics and categorized into three quantiles [6]. The dependent variable is body mass index (BMI) which was categorized as undernutrition for those with less than 18.5 kg/m2.


## 2.7. Data Analysis

All the questionnaires were checked visually, coded, and entered into Epi info version 3.5.4 and imported to SPSS Version 20.0 software package for analysis. To assess the presence of an association between dependent and independent variables, bivariate analysis was done. Variables with ap value of less than 0.20 were entered into multiple logistic regression model to identify the independent predictors of undernutrition of lactating mothers. The presence of an association between independent and dependent variables using multiple logistic regression model was assessed by using an odds ratio of a p value of less than 0.05. For the assessment of multicollinearity, variable inflation factors were used. The fitness of the model was tested by Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness of fit test and the test revealed a p value of 0.289.


## 2.8. Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from Institutional Review Board of Arba Minch University (ሕጤሳኮ/4284/54; Date 11/02/2009 EC). Permission to conduct the study was obtained from Angecha District Health Office. Verbal informed consent was obtained from each study participant before the interviews and measurement. The privacy of the study participants was maintained by interviewing the mother alone. The interview was conducted by the data collector alone and sometimes with the presence of the supervisor.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics of Lactating Mothers

Four hundred and ten lactating mothers participated in the study and the response rate was 99.0%. The mean (SD) age of study participants was 27.4 (5.2) years. Of the participants, the majority were from the Kembata ethnic group (82.0%), rural residents (80.5%), married (96.3%), and housewives (80.98%). One hundred seventy-eight (43.4%) participants attended formal education (Table1).Table 1
Sociodemographic characteristics of lactating mothers (N = 410).
VariablesCategoriesUndernutritionTotalYesN (%)NoN (%)Age of mothers17–25 years56 (31.1)124 (68.9)180 (43.9)26–35 years27 (13.6)171 (86.4)198 (48.3)36–49 years4 (12.5)28 (87.5)32 (7.8)Marital statusMarried83 (21.0)312 (79.0)395 (96.3)Others∗4 (26.7)11 (73.3)15 (3.7)EthnicityKambata67 (19.9)269 (80.1)336 (82.0)Hadiya18 (33.3)36 (66.7)54 (13.2)Other2 (10.0)18 (90.0)20 (4.9)ReligionProtestant65 (22.8)220 (77.2)285 (69.5)Orthodox9 (14.8)52 (85.3)61 (14.9)Adventist7 (16.7)35 (83.3)42 (10.2)Other6 (27.3)16 (72.7)22 (5.4)ResidenceRural79 (23.9)251 (76.1)330 (80.5)Urban8 (10.0)72 (90.0)80 (19.5)Mothers’ occupationFarmer10 (20.41)39 (79.6)49 (12.0)Housewife71 (23.4)233 (76.6)304 (74.2)Gov. employment2 (7.1)26 (92.9)28 (6.8)Other4 (13.8)25 (86.2)29 (7.1)Educational status of mothersUnable to read and write26 (21.1)97 (78.9)123 (30.0)Read and write only21 (19.3)88 (80.7)109 (26.6)Formal education40 (22.5)138 (77.5)178 (43.4)∗Include never married and divorced.The mean (SD) family size was 5.0 (1.6) individuals. Based on the HFIAS classification, 23 (5.6%) of the study participants’ households were in the severe food insecure category. Most of the participants’ households (89.0%) were headed by the husband. Nearly half of the husbands’ occupations were farming (57.3%) and attended formal education (50.2%). Almost all (98. 8%) of the households used protected water sources for drinking (Table2).Table 2
Characteristics of the households of lactating mothers (N = 410).
VariablesCategoriesUndernutritionTotalYesN (%)NoN (%)Head of the householdMother11 (26.8)30 (73.2)41 (10.0)Husband74 (20.4)291 (79.7)365 (89.0)Other∗2 (50.0)2 (50.0)4 (1.0)Educational status of head of the householdUnable to read and write21 (24.7)64 (75.3)85 (20.7)Able to read and write25 (21.0)94 (79.0)119 (29.0)Formal education41 (19.9)165 (80.1)206 (50.2)Occupation of head of the householdFarmer51 (21.7)184 (78.3)235 (57.3)Gov. employment8 (11.0)65 (89.0)73 (17.8)Private labor18 (29.5)43 (70.5)61 (14.9)Daily laborer10 (24.4)31 (75.6)41 (10.0)Number of children of age <5 yearsOne80 (22.3)279 (77.7)359 (87.6)Two7 (13.7)44 (86.3)51 (12.4)Family member size1–432 (19.4)133 (80.6)165 (40.2)>455 (22.5)190 (77.6)245 (59.8)Household food insecure levelFood secure69 (19.6)284 (80.5)353 (86.1)Mild food insecure7 (25.9)20 (74.1)27 (6.6)Moderately food insecure3 (42.9)4 (57.1)7 (1.7)Severely food insecure8 (34.8)15 (65.2)23 (5.6)Wealth index1st quantile29 (21.2)108 (78.8)137 (33.4)2nd quantile39 (28.5)98 (71.5)137 (33.4)3rd quantile19 (14.0)117 (86.0)136 (33.2)Source of waterPipe66 (20.0)265 (80.1)331 (80.7)Protected18 (24.3)56 (75.7)74 (18.1)Unprotected3 (60.0)2 (40.0)5 (1.2)∗Her/his father or mother and grandparents.


### 3.2. Reproductive Health- and Nutrition-Related Factors

From the total study participants, 242 (59.0%) experienced pregnancy 3 or 4 times and 313 (76.3%) received ANC at least once during their last pregnancy. Three hundred sixty-two (88.3%) lactating women introduced complementary feeding but only 143 (39.5%) were started at 6 months (at the recommended age). The mean dietary diversity score (SD) of study participants was 4.5 (1.6) with a range from 1 to 8. The mean (SD) age of breastfeeding children was 13.4 (5.4) months, and more than half (54.9%) were 12 and above months of age (Table3).Table 3
Reproductive health- and nutrition-related factors among lactating mothers (n = 410).
VariablesCategoriesUndernourishedTotalN (%)YesN (%)NoN (%)Gravidity≤233 (21.6)120 (78.4)153 (37.3)3–448 (19.8)194 (80.2)242 (59.0)>46 (40.0)9 (60.0)15 (3.7)ANC visitNo ANC32 (33.0)65 (67.0)97 (23.7)<4 times36 (20.3)141 (79.7)177 (43.2)≥4 times19 (14.0)117 (86.0)136 (33.2)Age of breastfeeding child<1232 (17.3)153 (82.7)185 (45.1)≥1255 (24.4)170 (75.6)225 (54.9)Breastfeeding frequency≤1218 (23.7)58 (76.3)76 (18.5)>1269 (20.7)265 (79.3)334 (81.5)Introduction of complementary feedingYes78 (21.6)284 (78.5)362 (88.3)No9 (18. 8)39 (81.3)48 (11.7)Frequency of meals (N = 362)<476 (22.1)268 (77.9)344 (95.0)≥42 (11.1)16 (88.9)18 (5.0)Cultural avoided foodYes3 (33.3)6 (66.7)9 (2.2)No84 (21.0)317 (79.1)401 (97.8)Nutritional knowledgePoor12 (35.3)22 (64.7)34 (8.3)Fair37 (21.5)135 (78.5)172 (42.0)Good38 (18.6)166 (81.4)204 (49.8)Women dietary diversity score<564 (29.9)150 (70.1)214 (52.2)≥523 (11.7)173 (88.3)196 (47.8)


### 3.3. Prevalence of Undernutrition among Lactating Mothers

Of the total lactating mothers included in the study, 21.2% (95% CI: 17.52, 25.46) were undernourished (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2). Overweight (BMI > 25 kg/m2) was 10.5% (95% CI: 7.86, 13.86). The mean (SD) BMI of the mothers was 21.39 (2.80) kg/m2.


### 3.4. Factors Associated with Undernutrition of Lactating Mothers

Based on bivariate analysis, the age of the mothers, gravidity, ANC follow-up, dietary diversity of the mothers, residency, household food security, and wealth index were significantly associated with the undernutrition of lactating mothers. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the age of mothers, ANC visits, dietary diversity score, and wealth index were significantly associated with the undernutrition of lactating mothers in the study area. Lactating mothers within the age group of 17–25 were four (AOR 4.12, 95% CI: 1.25–13.63) times more likely to be undernourished compared to those mothers in the age group of 36–49 years. The frequency of ANC visits had a significant association with the nutritional status of the lactating mothers. Mothers who had no ANC visits had nearly 3 times (95% CI: 1.43–5.86) higher odds to be malnourished than those who had more than 4 ANC visits. Regarding the dietary diversity score of lactating mothers, those mothers whose dietary diversity score less than the mean (4.5 food groups) were 2.4 (95% CI: 1.35–4.36) times more likely undernourished than those who had to consume five or more food groups. In this study, the family wealth index is another factor that was significantly associated with undernutrition among lactating mothers. The odds of undernutrition among lactating women from 3rd quantile wealth index households reduced by nearly half (AOR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.23–0.98) compared to lactating mothers from 1st quantile wealth index households (Table 4).Table 4
Factors associated with undernutrition in multiple logistic analysis of flactating women (N = 410).
VariablesCategoriesCOR (95% CI)AOR (95% CI)Age of mothers17–25 years3.16 (1.06, 9.44)∗4.12 (1.25, 13.63)∗26–35 years1.11 (0.36, 3.40)1.50 (0.45, 4.93)36–49 years11ResidenceRural2.83 (1.31, 6.14)∗2.32 (0.94, 5.74)Urban11ANC categoryNo ANC3.03 (1.59, 5.77)∗2.90 (1.43, 5.86)∗<4 times1.57 (0.86, 2.89)1.45 (0.75, 2.81)≥4 times11Age of breastfeeding child≤12 months11>12 months1.55 (0.95, 2.52)1.53 (0.89, 2.63)Dietary diversity score<53.20 (1.90, 5.42)∗2.42 (1.35, 4.36)∗≥511HFIAS categoryFood secure11Food insecure1.90 (1.02, 3.52)∗1.46 (0.74, 2.88)Gravidity1112–40.81 (0.49, 1.34)1.65 (0.89, 3.03)≥54.44 (1.70, 11.62)∗2.05 (0.56, 7.45)Wealth index1st quantile112nd quantile1.48 (0.85, 2.58)0.96 (0.49, 1.88)3rd quantile0.60 (0.32, 1.14)0.47 (0.23, 0.98)∗∗p value <0.05.


## 3.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics of Lactating Mothers

Four hundred and ten lactating mothers participated in the study and the response rate was 99.0%. The mean (SD) age of study participants was 27.4 (5.2) years. Of the participants, the majority were from the Kembata ethnic group (82.0%), rural residents (80.5%), married (96.3%), and housewives (80.98%). One hundred seventy-eight (43.4%) participants attended formal education (Table1).Table 1
Sociodemographic characteristics of lactating mothers (N = 410).
VariablesCategoriesUndernutritionTotalYesN (%)NoN (%)Age of mothers17–25 years56 (31.1)124 (68.9)180 (43.9)26–35 years27 (13.6)171 (86.4)198 (48.3)36–49 years4 (12.5)28 (87.5)32 (7.8)Marital statusMarried83 (21.0)312 (79.0)395 (96.3)Others∗4 (26.7)11 (73.3)15 (3.7)EthnicityKambata67 (19.9)269 (80.1)336 (82.0)Hadiya18 (33.3)36 (66.7)54 (13.2)Other2 (10.0)18 (90.0)20 (4.9)ReligionProtestant65 (22.8)220 (77.2)285 (69.5)Orthodox9 (14.8)52 (85.3)61 (14.9)Adventist7 (16.7)35 (83.3)42 (10.2)Other6 (27.3)16 (72.7)22 (5.4)ResidenceRural79 (23.9)251 (76.1)330 (80.5)Urban8 (10.0)72 (90.0)80 (19.5)Mothers’ occupationFarmer10 (20.41)39 (79.6)49 (12.0)Housewife71 (23.4)233 (76.6)304 (74.2)Gov. employment2 (7.1)26 (92.9)28 (6.8)Other4 (13.8)25 (86.2)29 (7.1)Educational status of mothersUnable to read and write26 (21.1)97 (78.9)123 (30.0)Read and write only21 (19.3)88 (80.7)109 (26.6)Formal education40 (22.5)138 (77.5)178 (43.4)∗Include never married and divorced.The mean (SD) family size was 5.0 (1.6) individuals. Based on the HFIAS classification, 23 (5.6%) of the study participants’ households were in the severe food insecure category. Most of the participants’ households (89.0%) were headed by the husband. Nearly half of the husbands’ occupations were farming (57.3%) and attended formal education (50.2%). Almost all (98. 8%) of the households used protected water sources for drinking (Table2).Table 2
Characteristics of the households of lactating mothers (N = 410).
VariablesCategoriesUndernutritionTotalYesN (%)NoN (%)Head of the householdMother11 (26.8)30 (73.2)41 (10.0)Husband74 (20.4)291 (79.7)365 (89.0)Other∗2 (50.0)2 (50.0)4 (1.0)Educational status of head of the householdUnable to read and write21 (24.7)64 (75.3)85 (20.7)Able to read and write25 (21.0)94 (79.0)119 (29.0)Formal education41 (19.9)165 (80.1)206 (50.2)Occupation of head of the householdFarmer51 (21.7)184 (78.3)235 (57.3)Gov. employment8 (11.0)65 (89.0)73 (17.8)Private labor18 (29.5)43 (70.5)61 (14.9)Daily laborer10 (24.4)31 (75.6)41 (10.0)Number of children of age <5 yearsOne80 (22.3)279 (77.7)359 (87.6)Two7 (13.7)44 (86.3)51 (12.4)Family member size1–432 (19.4)133 (80.6)165 (40.2)>455 (22.5)190 (77.6)245 (59.8)Household food insecure levelFood secure69 (19.6)284 (80.5)353 (86.1)Mild food insecure7 (25.9)20 (74.1)27 (6.6)Moderately food insecure3 (42.9)4 (57.1)7 (1.7)Severely food insecure8 (34.8)15 (65.2)23 (5.6)Wealth index1st quantile29 (21.2)108 (78.8)137 (33.4)2nd quantile39 (28.5)98 (71.5)137 (33.4)3rd quantile19 (14.0)117 (86.0)136 (33.2)Source of waterPipe66 (20.0)265 (80.1)331 (80.7)Protected18 (24.3)56 (75.7)74 (18.1)Unprotected3 (60.0)2 (40.0)5 (1.2)∗Her/his father or mother and grandparents.


## 3.2. Reproductive Health- and Nutrition-Related Factors

From the total study participants, 242 (59.0%) experienced pregnancy 3 or 4 times and 313 (76.3%) received ANC at least once during their last pregnancy. Three hundred sixty-two (88.3%) lactating women introduced complementary feeding but only 143 (39.5%) were started at 6 months (at the recommended age). The mean dietary diversity score (SD) of study participants was 4.5 (1.6) with a range from 1 to 8. The mean (SD) age of breastfeeding children was 13.4 (5.4) months, and more than half (54.9%) were 12 and above months of age (Table3).Table 3
Reproductive health- and nutrition-related factors among lactating mothers (n = 410).
VariablesCategoriesUndernourishedTotalN (%)YesN (%)NoN (%)Gravidity≤233 (21.6)120 (78.4)153 (37.3)3–448 (19.8)194 (80.2)242 (59.0)>46 (40.0)9 (60.0)15 (3.7)ANC visitNo ANC32 (33.0)65 (67.0)97 (23.7)<4 times36 (20.3)141 (79.7)177 (43.2)≥4 times19 (14.0)117 (86.0)136 (33.2)Age of breastfeeding child<1232 (17.3)153 (82.7)185 (45.1)≥1255 (24.4)170 (75.6)225 (54.9)Breastfeeding frequency≤1218 (23.7)58 (76.3)76 (18.5)>1269 (20.7)265 (79.3)334 (81.5)Introduction of complementary feedingYes78 (21.6)284 (78.5)362 (88.3)No9 (18. 8)39 (81.3)48 (11.7)Frequency of meals (N = 362)<476 (22.1)268 (77.9)344 (95.0)≥42 (11.1)16 (88.9)18 (5.0)Cultural avoided foodYes3 (33.3)6 (66.7)9 (2.2)No84 (21.0)317 (79.1)401 (97.8)Nutritional knowledgePoor12 (35.3)22 (64.7)34 (8.3)Fair37 (21.5)135 (78.5)172 (42.0)Good38 (18.6)166 (81.4)204 (49.8)Women dietary diversity score<564 (29.9)150 (70.1)214 (52.2)≥523 (11.7)173 (88.3)196 (47.8)


## 3.3. Prevalence of Undernutrition among Lactating Mothers

Of the total lactating mothers included in the study, 21.2% (95% CI: 17.52, 25.46) were undernourished (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2). Overweight (BMI > 25 kg/m2) was 10.5% (95% CI: 7.86, 13.86). The mean (SD) BMI of the mothers was 21.39 (2.80) kg/m2.


## 3.4. Factors Associated with Undernutrition of Lactating Mothers

Based on bivariate analysis, the age of the mothers, gravidity, ANC follow-up, dietary diversity of the mothers, residency, household food security, and wealth index were significantly associated with the undernutrition of lactating mothers. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the age of mothers, ANC visits, dietary diversity score, and wealth index were significantly associated with the undernutrition of lactating mothers in the study area. Lactating mothers within the age group of 17–25 were four (AOR 4.12, 95% CI: 1.25–13.63) times more likely to be undernourished compared to those mothers in the age group of 36–49 years. The frequency of ANC visits had a significant association with the nutritional status of the lactating mothers. Mothers who had no ANC visits had nearly 3 times (95% CI: 1.43–5.86) higher odds to be malnourished than those who had more than 4 ANC visits. Regarding the dietary diversity score of lactating mothers, those mothers whose dietary diversity score less than the mean (4.5 food groups) were 2.4 (95% CI: 1.35–4.36) times more likely undernourished than those who had to consume five or more food groups. In this study, the family wealth index is another factor that was significantly associated with undernutrition among lactating mothers. The odds of undernutrition among lactating women from 3rd quantile wealth index households reduced by nearly half (AOR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.23–0.98) compared to lactating mothers from 1st quantile wealth index households (Table 4).Table 4
Factors associated with undernutrition in multiple logistic analysis of flactating women (N = 410).
VariablesCategoriesCOR (95% CI)AOR (95% CI)Age of mothers17–25 years3.16 (1.06, 9.44)∗4.12 (1.25, 13.63)∗26–35 years1.11 (0.36, 3.40)1.50 (0.45, 4.93)36–49 years11ResidenceRural2.83 (1.31, 6.14)∗2.32 (0.94, 5.74)Urban11ANC categoryNo ANC3.03 (1.59, 5.77)∗2.90 (1.43, 5.86)∗<4 times1.57 (0.86, 2.89)1.45 (0.75, 2.81)≥4 times11Age of breastfeeding child≤12 months11>12 months1.55 (0.95, 2.52)1.53 (0.89, 2.63)Dietary diversity score<53.20 (1.90, 5.42)∗2.42 (1.35, 4.36)∗≥511HFIAS categoryFood secure11Food insecure1.90 (1.02, 3.52)∗1.46 (0.74, 2.88)Gravidity1112–40.81 (0.49, 1.34)1.65 (0.89, 3.03)≥54.44 (1.70, 11.62)∗2.05 (0.56, 7.45)Wealth index1st quantile112nd quantile1.48 (0.85, 2.58)0.96 (0.49, 1.88)3rd quantile0.60 (0.32, 1.14)0.47 (0.23, 0.98)∗∗p value <0.05.


## 4. Discussion

The study showed that the prevalence of undernutrition among lactating mothers was 21.2%. Studies conducted in Adama District, Ambo District, Nekemte town, and Raya District of Ethiopia showed the prevalence of undernutrition among lactating mothers from 19.5% to 21.5%, which is similar to this report [23–26]. In addition, the prevalence of undernutrition among lactating mothers was slightly lower than studies conducted in Northern Ethiopia (Womberma and Samre Districts) which was nearly around 25% [19, 27]. Compared to this finding, a significantly higher prevalence of undernutrition among lactating mothers was reported by different studies conducted in Ethiopia. For instance, studies conducted at Kilte Awaleo-Health and Demographic Surveillance Site, Dedo, Seqa-chekorsa, Babile, Endreta, and Hintalo Wajirat Districts of Ethiopia, showed that the ranges of the prevalence of undernutrition among lactating mothers were from 38% to 54.7% [28–30]. The nutritional baseline survey report by Ethiopian Health and Nutritional Research Institute showed the prevalence was 28.8% [31]. On the contrary, the prevalence of this finding is much higher than studies conducted in Kenya (10%) and Nigeria (5%) [32, 33].Mothers within the age group of 17–25 years (younger) had nearly 4 times higher odds of undernutrition compared with mothers within the age group of 36–49 years (older). This is in line with a result from Ethiopia Health and Nutrition Research Institute, which indicated that younger women were more likely to be malnourished [31]. In addition, studies conducted at Womberma and Ambo Districts of Ethiopia showed similar pattern regarding the increase of the prevalence of undernutrition among young lactating women [26, 27]. Even if the relationship was significant only for lowlanders, a comparative cross-sectional study conducted at Raya Alamata District, Northern Ethiopia, showed that a higher proportion of malnourished women was observed in the younger lactating mothers [23]. A report by Bhandari et al. on women of reproductive age group based on demographic survey data of Nepal prevailed that younger women were more likely to be malnourished than older women [34]. This might be related to the increased nutritional needs of younger women and additional requirements imposed due to prior pregnancy and recent lactation [35]. On top of the physiological vulnerability, inadequate use of maternal health services like ANC and skilled birth attendance among young mothers may contribute to the increment of the prevalence of undernutrition [36]. Another study conducted in Jimma Zone, Southwest Ethiopia, showed that undernutrition was not associated with the age of the mothers [28].On the other hand, women who had not visited ANC had nearly 3 times higher odds of undernutrition compared to those who had frequent (four or more) ANC visits during the last pregnancy. This result is in line with the study conducted in Samara District, Northern Ethiopia [19]. Repeated visits to the health facility during the ANC follow-up increase the exposure of the mothers to health and nutritional education and other health facility-based interventions, which might reduce the riskiness of the mother for malnutrition.The dietary diversity score of mothers was found to be associated with undernutrition. Study participants who ate less than five food groups on the preceding day of the interview were more likely to be undernourished. A study conducted in Jimma Zone, Southwest Ethiopia, and Moyale District, Borena Zone, Southern Ethiopia, on lactating mothers showed that the dietary diversity score of the mother was associated with undernutrition [31, 37]. Among lactating mothers, dietary monotony is commonly associated with lower socioeconomic status, unemployment, food insecurity, and illiteracy [38–40]. A study conducted among women of Burkina Faso showed that dietary score is a proxy for overall dietary quality and is also linked with the nutritional status of women [41].The household wealth status is crucial to improve the nutritional status of lactating mothers. The current study finding also supports this evidence. The odds of mothers from higher wealth index (richer) households were nearly lower by half to develop undernutrition compared to those from lower wealth index (poor) households. A study at Ambo District, Ethiopia, showed that lactating mothers from poor households were 1.76 times more likely to be undernourished than their counterparts (richer) [26]. A report based on demographic and health surveys in Burkina Faso and the Congo Democratic Republic on married women of reproductive age group supports the finding of this research. It indicated that women from poor households were more likely to be undernourished than from the rich [42, 43]. This might be related to the association of poverty, which was indicated as a lower wealth index, and the worsening of a range of key human attributes, including health and nutritional status.Recall and social desirability biases could be the limitations of the study. For categorizing women to undernutrition, we used a BMI of less than 18.5 kg/m2. As it is difficult to obtain a cutoff point for lactating mothers and due to the physiological increase in body weight during pregnancy, which also remains during lactating, it may contribute to the lower prevalence of undernutrition. Even if we excluded known pregnant lactating mothers, in this study we did not use biomarkers for the assessment of pregnancy. It is also difficult to know the usual dietary diversity using a single-day assessment.


## 5. Conclusions

Lactating mothers’ undernutrition is prominent in this study setting. One in five lactating mothers was undernourished. Younger age group, not receiving ANC, consuming less diversified food, and from the low wealth status households were associated with undernutrition of lactating mothers. Therefore, due attention should have to be given to younger lactating mothers and to increase the ANC attendance of the women. In addition, alternative approaches should have to be required for households with poor socioeconomic status and to increase the dietary diversity of mothers.



---

*Source: 6691982-2021-04-27.xml*