# Model and Experiment on Resistance Loss of Wet Chordal Grid with Spray Pressure and Structural Parameters

Authors: Hua Guo; Haiqiao Wang; Zhirong Wu
Journal: Mathematical Problems in Engineering
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

To reduce the dedusting resistance of wet vibrating string grille precipitators during dedusting in mine ventilation roadways, we investigated the dedusting resistance characteristics of water fog and water film coupling and determined the relationship between dedusting resistance and spray pressure, vibrating grid filling rate, and wind speed. A mathematical resistance coefficient model is established using hydrodynamics theory and capillary mechanics. The theoretical relationship of dedusting resistance is deduced. The results show that when wind speed is constant, the spray pressure and dedusting resistance are higher and the resistance is smaller with a high filling rate compared with a low filling rate. Constant spray pressure allows faster wind speeds and reverse pressure gradient forces to increase when dust flows around the wet vibrating wire, which makes the pressure distribution asymmetrical around the steel wire and increases resistance. Dust removal resistance of the resonance chord with a high filling rate is substantially lower than that with a low filling rate under the same working conditions. On the basis of satisfying the dedusting efficiency, the resonance chord dedusting system does not affect normal production and resistance is low. The spray pressure is controlled at 0.3–0.7 MPa and the optimal wind speed is 3–4 m/s. According to the theoretical calculation and experimental data, the optimal filling rate of a vibrating string grid plate is 77.8%, spray pressure is 0.7 MPa, and wind speed is 3.5 m/s. Dust removal with low resistance and improved economic benefit can thus be obtained.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Dust pollution is one of the six major disasters in the mining engineering industry [1] and affects the physical and mental health of mine workers. Respirable mining dust does not settle easily, which causes the mine exhaust system to enter the atmosphere and harm the health and living environment of communities surrounding the mining area. With new implementation of an industrial pollutant discharge standard in China [2], the manner by which mine dust is controlled from the source is particularly important [3–5], especially for dust from mine return roadways. Dedusting measures for mine dust have been rapidly developed to address this problem. The main dedusting measures are coal seam water injection, ventilation dedusting, spray dedusting, and dust collector dedusting [6–9]. However, dust removal efficiency remains low, especially for respirable dust [10]. Although wet dedusting equipment can be used to improve dust removal efficiency, implementation is impractical because it affects normal mine production. Exploration of a wet vibrating wire grid dedusting technology with high dedusting efficiency and low resistance is therefore required to resolve the dedusting resistance characteristics of a vibrating string grid in theory and practical engineering experiments.Coupled dedusting of water mist and water films is a new approach to gas purification. Compared with the conventional wet-fiber grid dedusting method, coupled dedusting has the advantages of high dedusting efficiency (especially for respirable dust), low resistance, low energy consumption, convenient ash cleaning, and simple maintenance. Previous studies on the dedusting resistance of a wet vibrating grid have mainly been based on experiments. Gong et al. [11] studied dedusting resistance from the spray state on the grid combined with the number of vibrating chord grid layers and wind speeds. Ge [12] tested three different specifications of fiber grids and water pressures and added dust reducer to the water to investigate dedusting resistance. Zhao [13] analyzed the resistance characteristics of a vibrating chord gate from two aspects of fog droplets and the vibrating string steel wire and experimentally measured the resistance corresponding to different spray quantities. Zhang [14] carried out single-factor experiments on dust removal resistance focusing on spray water quantity, spray distance, grid plate number, and filtration wind speed. Chen and Zhang [15] constructed a dust purification model of a wet-fiber grid and deduced a semiempirical and semitheoretical formula of dust removal resistance suitable for low wind speeds (1–1.5 m/s). In addition, wet-fiber grid dedusting has been applied in some mining enterprises and smelters, but the field application resistance is large, and the effect is not ideal. However, there is little theoretical research on resistance characteristics using steel wire based on the coupling action of water mist and the vibrating chord grid and the formation/breakage of the chord gate water film.We therefore analyze coupled dedusting resistance characteristics of water mist and water film from the basic theories of capillary mechanics, hydrostatics, vibration dynamics, hydrodynamics, and aerosol mechanics and develop a resistance theory model. The friction and inertia resistance of air flowing around the vibrating string steel wire are deduced on the basis of flow theory. A comparison of theoretical calculations and experimental data provides the theoretical basis and application guidance for dust prevention and the control of mine return-air roadways by wet vibrating string grid dedusting technology.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Friction Resistance and Inertia Resistance

Vibrating gate dedusting under the coupled action of a water mist and water film is the process of gas purification of dust under the force of air flow and water mist through a wet vibrating wire grid plate. The water mist is sprayed uniformly on the grid plate and a water film forms under the double action of capillary and resonance. Flow resistance is the flow through the interface (Figure1), which causes a change in energy. When a fluid such as water, wind, or aerosol flows around a cylindrical vibrating wire, the asymmetric shear stress on the wire surface and pressure change present important controlling factors of flow resistance. The pressure difference is the inertia resistance, and the shear force is the friction resistance.Figure 1
Water fog and vibrating string grille water film dedusting mechanism.


### 2.2. Establishment and Derivation of Resistance Theory Model

#### 2.2.1. Basic Hypothesis

(1) The cross section of the wire in the vibrating wire grid is circular.(2)
The water mist from the nozzle flows perpendicular along the wire under airflow carrying dust particles.(3)
There is no heat exchange on the surface of the wire, which is an adiabatic wall.(4)
The water mist through the wire is uniformly distributed and the water film that forms in the wire is also uniformly distributed in the entire wire gap of the grid plate.(5)
The dust particles captured on the vibrating string panel are removed with the flow of water mist or rupture of the water film, and the subsequent dedusting process remains unaffected.


#### 2.2.2. Theoretical Model

The microelement of the vibrating wire layer is taken along the flow field streamlineM direction, as shown in Figure 2. Force analysis of the microelement body shows that the forces acting on the microplasma along the air flow direction are as follows: the friction resistance f of the fluid flowing through the gap in the vibrating wire and the inertia resistance ΔP1 caused by the asymmetrical pressure distribution around the wire.Figure 2
Force analysis of a vibrating string grille microelement body.The wire arranged around the two-dimensional air flow structure is regarded as a long cylinder perpendicular to the wind flow direction owing to the gap between the steel wires. The flow around the long cylinder group is parallel. Xiang [16] derived the dimensionless friction resistance formula f∗ using the cell shell model (shear force free condition):(1)f∗=4π−1/2−1/2lnβ+β2/1+β2,where β is the dimensionless filling rate of wet vibrating wire that can be obtained by(2)β=βs+βw,where βs is the dimensionless wire filling rate, that is, the ratio of wire area to chord grid area, βw is the water filling rate on the wire, and it can be calculated by measuring the latter’s liquid carrying capacity [17].The dimensionless friction resistancef∗ can be derived from the principle of classical mechanics. Specifically, the friction resistance of the grid plate to the wetting air flow obeys Newton’s law [18] if the friction resistance acting on the wire per unit length is assumed to be(3)f∗=fvμ,where v is the air velocity (m/s) and μ is the aerodynamic viscosity (Pa·S).When fluid flows around the vibrating wire, the aerodynamic viscosity can be expressed as [19](4)μ=μ0T288.153/2288.15+BT+B,where μ0 is the dynamic viscosity of air at 15°C, 1.79 × 10−5 Pa·S, T is the gas temperature (K), 110.4 K, and B is a constant related to the gas properties.The flow around a long cylinder has both potential and viscous flows. Viscous flow is mainly considered to calculatef, whereas potential flow can be ignored. Equation (3) can be substituted into equation (1). The friction resistance f of fluid flow around a vibrating wire is(5)f=f∗vμ=4πvμ−1/2−1/2lnβ+β2/1+β2.Combined with equations (4) and (5), the following is obtained:(6)f=4πv7.13×10−3/T+110.4×T/288.153/2−1/2−1/2lnβ+β2/1+β2.When moist dust carried by the air flows through the gap of the vibrating wire, it contracts into the gap and the water film in the clearance deforms under viscoelastic action until the water film is blown through. At this point, the cross section at the back of the vibrating wire is minimized, whereas the cross section flow in the rear section is full. The fluid flowing through the wire is approximately regarded as the fluid flowing around the cylinder. The inertia resistance of the fluid flowing through the gap is calculated according to the principle of pressure loss around the flow cylinder. The continuity equation is [20](7)v1=QA,v2=QεA0,where v1 is the average velocity of fluid in the vibrating wire gap, 1.79 × 10−5 m/s, Q is the flow rate of the wire clearance through the fluid (m3/s), A is the wire clearance area (m2), v2 is the velocity at the minimum shrinkage section between the wire gaps (m/s), ε is the shrinkage coefficient of airflow through the minimum section (dimensionless), and A0 is the rupture area when air flows through the water film (m2).The average velocityν1 of the vibrating wire gap fluid is expressed as(8)v1=v1−β.The Baroda formula [21] is used to study the inertia resistance of the flow through the unit area of the wire gap:(9)ΔP1=12ρv1−v22.Replacing equation (8) with (9) yields(10)ΔP1=12ρQεA0−QA2.Further deformation includes(11)ΔP1=12ρQεA0−QA2QA2AQ2,which can be simplified to(12)ΔP1=12ρAεA0−12v12.The following formula is used to obtainA0 when air flows through the water film:(13)A0=A−Aw,where Aw is the effective water film area (sum of the primary and secondary film areas) (m2).Replacing equation (8) with equations (12) and (13) gives(14)ΔP1=12ρAεA−Aw−12ν1−β2.When air flows through the water film, the cross-sectional area at the time when the water film breaks is the minimum shrinkage cross section; that is,ε = 1. Equation (14) can be simplified to(15)ΔP1=12ρAA−Aw−12ν1−β2.The effective area of the water film in the gap can be expressed by the equivalent wire diameter:(16)Aw=π4d21−β.Replacing equation (16) with equation (15) gives(17)ΔP1=12ρAA−π/4d21−β−12ν1−β2.The theoretical calculation of dust removal assumes that the water mist is uniformly attached to the wire surface and flows owing to gravity. According to Figure1, the equivalent diameter d of the wire is the sum of the diameter ds of the wire and annular water mist component that is attached to the wire surface [22, 23].Figure1 shows that there is a relationship between d and ds:(18)π4d2−ds2=VsβwLs,where Vs is the plate volume (m3) and Ls is the total wire length (m), the latter of which can be expressed as [24,25](19)Ls=4βsVsπds2.Substituting equation (18) into equation (19) gives(20)d=ds1+βwβs=dsββs.Combined with equations (17) and (20), the following can be used to calculate the inertia resistance at both ends of the wire with respect to fluid density, velocity, wire diameter, clearance area, and wet wire filling rate:(21)ΔP1=12ρAA−π/4dsβ/βs21−β−12ν1−β2.The total resistance in the dedusting process of a vibrating chord grid is as follows:(22)ΔP=ΔP1+f12ρAA−π/4dsβ/βs21−β−12ν1−β2+4πv7.13×10−3/T+110.4×T/288.153/2−1/2−1/2lnβs+β2/1+β2.


## 2.1. Friction Resistance and Inertia Resistance

Vibrating gate dedusting under the coupled action of a water mist and water film is the process of gas purification of dust under the force of air flow and water mist through a wet vibrating wire grid plate. The water mist is sprayed uniformly on the grid plate and a water film forms under the double action of capillary and resonance. Flow resistance is the flow through the interface (Figure1), which causes a change in energy. When a fluid such as water, wind, or aerosol flows around a cylindrical vibrating wire, the asymmetric shear stress on the wire surface and pressure change present important controlling factors of flow resistance. The pressure difference is the inertia resistance, and the shear force is the friction resistance.Figure 1
Water fog and vibrating string grille water film dedusting mechanism.


## 2.2. Establishment and Derivation of Resistance Theory Model

### 2.2.1. Basic Hypothesis

(1) The cross section of the wire in the vibrating wire grid is circular.(2)
The water mist from the nozzle flows perpendicular along the wire under airflow carrying dust particles.(3)
There is no heat exchange on the surface of the wire, which is an adiabatic wall.(4)
The water mist through the wire is uniformly distributed and the water film that forms in the wire is also uniformly distributed in the entire wire gap of the grid plate.(5)
The dust particles captured on the vibrating string panel are removed with the flow of water mist or rupture of the water film, and the subsequent dedusting process remains unaffected.


### 2.2.2. Theoretical Model

The microelement of the vibrating wire layer is taken along the flow field streamlineM direction, as shown in Figure 2. Force analysis of the microelement body shows that the forces acting on the microplasma along the air flow direction are as follows: the friction resistance f of the fluid flowing through the gap in the vibrating wire and the inertia resistance ΔP1 caused by the asymmetrical pressure distribution around the wire.Figure 2
Force analysis of a vibrating string grille microelement body.The wire arranged around the two-dimensional air flow structure is regarded as a long cylinder perpendicular to the wind flow direction owing to the gap between the steel wires. The flow around the long cylinder group is parallel. Xiang [16] derived the dimensionless friction resistance formula f∗ using the cell shell model (shear force free condition):(1)f∗=4π−1/2−1/2lnβ+β2/1+β2,where β is the dimensionless filling rate of wet vibrating wire that can be obtained by(2)β=βs+βw,where βs is the dimensionless wire filling rate, that is, the ratio of wire area to chord grid area, βw is the water filling rate on the wire, and it can be calculated by measuring the latter’s liquid carrying capacity [17].The dimensionless friction resistancef∗ can be derived from the principle of classical mechanics. Specifically, the friction resistance of the grid plate to the wetting air flow obeys Newton’s law [18] if the friction resistance acting on the wire per unit length is assumed to be(3)f∗=fvμ,where v is the air velocity (m/s) and μ is the aerodynamic viscosity (Pa·S).When fluid flows around the vibrating wire, the aerodynamic viscosity can be expressed as [19](4)μ=μ0T288.153/2288.15+BT+B,where μ0 is the dynamic viscosity of air at 15°C, 1.79 × 10−5 Pa·S, T is the gas temperature (K), 110.4 K, and B is a constant related to the gas properties.The flow around a long cylinder has both potential and viscous flows. Viscous flow is mainly considered to calculatef, whereas potential flow can be ignored. Equation (3) can be substituted into equation (1). The friction resistance f of fluid flow around a vibrating wire is(5)f=f∗vμ=4πvμ−1/2−1/2lnβ+β2/1+β2.Combined with equations (4) and (5), the following is obtained:(6)f=4πv7.13×10−3/T+110.4×T/288.153/2−1/2−1/2lnβ+β2/1+β2.When moist dust carried by the air flows through the gap of the vibrating wire, it contracts into the gap and the water film in the clearance deforms under viscoelastic action until the water film is blown through. At this point, the cross section at the back of the vibrating wire is minimized, whereas the cross section flow in the rear section is full. The fluid flowing through the wire is approximately regarded as the fluid flowing around the cylinder. The inertia resistance of the fluid flowing through the gap is calculated according to the principle of pressure loss around the flow cylinder. The continuity equation is [20](7)v1=QA,v2=QεA0,where v1 is the average velocity of fluid in the vibrating wire gap, 1.79 × 10−5 m/s, Q is the flow rate of the wire clearance through the fluid (m3/s), A is the wire clearance area (m2), v2 is the velocity at the minimum shrinkage section between the wire gaps (m/s), ε is the shrinkage coefficient of airflow through the minimum section (dimensionless), and A0 is the rupture area when air flows through the water film (m2).The average velocityν1 of the vibrating wire gap fluid is expressed as(8)v1=v1−β.The Baroda formula [21] is used to study the inertia resistance of the flow through the unit area of the wire gap:(9)ΔP1=12ρv1−v22.Replacing equation (8) with (9) yields(10)ΔP1=12ρQεA0−QA2.Further deformation includes(11)ΔP1=12ρQεA0−QA2QA2AQ2,which can be simplified to(12)ΔP1=12ρAεA0−12v12.The following formula is used to obtainA0 when air flows through the water film:(13)A0=A−Aw,where Aw is the effective water film area (sum of the primary and secondary film areas) (m2).Replacing equation (8) with equations (12) and (13) gives(14)ΔP1=12ρAεA−Aw−12ν1−β2.When air flows through the water film, the cross-sectional area at the time when the water film breaks is the minimum shrinkage cross section; that is,ε = 1. Equation (14) can be simplified to(15)ΔP1=12ρAA−Aw−12ν1−β2.The effective area of the water film in the gap can be expressed by the equivalent wire diameter:(16)Aw=π4d21−β.Replacing equation (16) with equation (15) gives(17)ΔP1=12ρAA−π/4d21−β−12ν1−β2.The theoretical calculation of dust removal assumes that the water mist is uniformly attached to the wire surface and flows owing to gravity. According to Figure1, the equivalent diameter d of the wire is the sum of the diameter ds of the wire and annular water mist component that is attached to the wire surface [22, 23].Figure1 shows that there is a relationship between d and ds:(18)π4d2−ds2=VsβwLs,where Vs is the plate volume (m3) and Ls is the total wire length (m), the latter of which can be expressed as [24,25](19)Ls=4βsVsπds2.Substituting equation (18) into equation (19) gives(20)d=ds1+βwβs=dsββs.Combined with equations (17) and (20), the following can be used to calculate the inertia resistance at both ends of the wire with respect to fluid density, velocity, wire diameter, clearance area, and wet wire filling rate:(21)ΔP1=12ρAA−π/4dsβ/βs21−β−12ν1−β2.The total resistance in the dedusting process of a vibrating chord grid is as follows:(22)ΔP=ΔP1+f12ρAA−π/4dsβ/βs21−β−12ν1−β2+4πv7.13×10−3/T+110.4×T/288.153/2−1/2−1/2lnβs+β2/1+β2.


## 2.2.1. Basic Hypothesis

(1) The cross section of the wire in the vibrating wire grid is circular.(2)
The water mist from the nozzle flows perpendicular along the wire under airflow carrying dust particles.(3)
There is no heat exchange on the surface of the wire, which is an adiabatic wall.(4)
The water mist through the wire is uniformly distributed and the water film that forms in the wire is also uniformly distributed in the entire wire gap of the grid plate.(5)
The dust particles captured on the vibrating string panel are removed with the flow of water mist or rupture of the water film, and the subsequent dedusting process remains unaffected.


## 2.2.2. Theoretical Model

The microelement of the vibrating wire layer is taken along the flow field streamlineM direction, as shown in Figure 2. Force analysis of the microelement body shows that the forces acting on the microplasma along the air flow direction are as follows: the friction resistance f of the fluid flowing through the gap in the vibrating wire and the inertia resistance ΔP1 caused by the asymmetrical pressure distribution around the wire.Figure 2
Force analysis of a vibrating string grille microelement body.The wire arranged around the two-dimensional air flow structure is regarded as a long cylinder perpendicular to the wind flow direction owing to the gap between the steel wires. The flow around the long cylinder group is parallel. Xiang [16] derived the dimensionless friction resistance formula f∗ using the cell shell model (shear force free condition):(1)f∗=4π−1/2−1/2lnβ+β2/1+β2,where β is the dimensionless filling rate of wet vibrating wire that can be obtained by(2)β=βs+βw,where βs is the dimensionless wire filling rate, that is, the ratio of wire area to chord grid area, βw is the water filling rate on the wire, and it can be calculated by measuring the latter’s liquid carrying capacity [17].The dimensionless friction resistancef∗ can be derived from the principle of classical mechanics. Specifically, the friction resistance of the grid plate to the wetting air flow obeys Newton’s law [18] if the friction resistance acting on the wire per unit length is assumed to be(3)f∗=fvμ,where v is the air velocity (m/s) and μ is the aerodynamic viscosity (Pa·S).When fluid flows around the vibrating wire, the aerodynamic viscosity can be expressed as [19](4)μ=μ0T288.153/2288.15+BT+B,where μ0 is the dynamic viscosity of air at 15°C, 1.79 × 10−5 Pa·S, T is the gas temperature (K), 110.4 K, and B is a constant related to the gas properties.The flow around a long cylinder has both potential and viscous flows. Viscous flow is mainly considered to calculatef, whereas potential flow can be ignored. Equation (3) can be substituted into equation (1). The friction resistance f of fluid flow around a vibrating wire is(5)f=f∗vμ=4πvμ−1/2−1/2lnβ+β2/1+β2.Combined with equations (4) and (5), the following is obtained:(6)f=4πv7.13×10−3/T+110.4×T/288.153/2−1/2−1/2lnβ+β2/1+β2.When moist dust carried by the air flows through the gap of the vibrating wire, it contracts into the gap and the water film in the clearance deforms under viscoelastic action until the water film is blown through. At this point, the cross section at the back of the vibrating wire is minimized, whereas the cross section flow in the rear section is full. The fluid flowing through the wire is approximately regarded as the fluid flowing around the cylinder. The inertia resistance of the fluid flowing through the gap is calculated according to the principle of pressure loss around the flow cylinder. The continuity equation is [20](7)v1=QA,v2=QεA0,where v1 is the average velocity of fluid in the vibrating wire gap, 1.79 × 10−5 m/s, Q is the flow rate of the wire clearance through the fluid (m3/s), A is the wire clearance area (m2), v2 is the velocity at the minimum shrinkage section between the wire gaps (m/s), ε is the shrinkage coefficient of airflow through the minimum section (dimensionless), and A0 is the rupture area when air flows through the water film (m2).The average velocityν1 of the vibrating wire gap fluid is expressed as(8)v1=v1−β.The Baroda formula [21] is used to study the inertia resistance of the flow through the unit area of the wire gap:(9)ΔP1=12ρv1−v22.Replacing equation (8) with (9) yields(10)ΔP1=12ρQεA0−QA2.Further deformation includes(11)ΔP1=12ρQεA0−QA2QA2AQ2,which can be simplified to(12)ΔP1=12ρAεA0−12v12.The following formula is used to obtainA0 when air flows through the water film:(13)A0=A−Aw,where Aw is the effective water film area (sum of the primary and secondary film areas) (m2).Replacing equation (8) with equations (12) and (13) gives(14)ΔP1=12ρAεA−Aw−12ν1−β2.When air flows through the water film, the cross-sectional area at the time when the water film breaks is the minimum shrinkage cross section; that is,ε = 1. Equation (14) can be simplified to(15)ΔP1=12ρAA−Aw−12ν1−β2.The effective area of the water film in the gap can be expressed by the equivalent wire diameter:(16)Aw=π4d21−β.Replacing equation (16) with equation (15) gives(17)ΔP1=12ρAA−π/4d21−β−12ν1−β2.The theoretical calculation of dust removal assumes that the water mist is uniformly attached to the wire surface and flows owing to gravity. According to Figure1, the equivalent diameter d of the wire is the sum of the diameter ds of the wire and annular water mist component that is attached to the wire surface [22, 23].Figure1 shows that there is a relationship between d and ds:(18)π4d2−ds2=VsβwLs,where Vs is the plate volume (m3) and Ls is the total wire length (m), the latter of which can be expressed as [24,25](19)Ls=4βsVsπds2.Substituting equation (18) into equation (19) gives(20)d=ds1+βwβs=dsββs.Combined with equations (17) and (20), the following can be used to calculate the inertia resistance at both ends of the wire with respect to fluid density, velocity, wire diameter, clearance area, and wet wire filling rate:(21)ΔP1=12ρAA−π/4dsβ/βs21−β−12ν1−β2.The total resistance in the dedusting process of a vibrating chord grid is as follows:(22)ΔP=ΔP1+f12ρAA−π/4dsβ/βs21−β−12ν1−β2+4πv7.13×10−3/T+110.4×T/288.153/2−1/2−1/2lnβs+β2/1+β2.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Experimental System and Scheme

Dust-containing air in the return-air roadway of a mine is simulated through a vibrating chord grid dedusting system, as shown in Figure3. The experimental system is composed of the following subsystems: dust, ventilation, spray, vibrating chord grid dust removal, and drainage. The vibrating string grid dust removal subsystem located in the middle of the apparatus is mainly composed of the vibrating string steel wire, water mist, and water film attached to the wire. The roadway model is made of 10 mm thick high-strength plexiglass to facilitate observation.Figure 3
Test system of the wet vibrating string grille filter and dust removal. (1) AG410 dry powder aerosol diffuser; (2) rotor flowmeter; (3) gate valve; (4) pressure switch; (5) air compressor; (6) pitot tube; (7) rubber tube; (8) TSI pressure gauge; (9) CCZ-20 dust sampler; (10) SS-10w stainless steel nozzle; (11) DX801XB00150 digital pressure gauge; (12) intelligent electromagnetic flowmeter. (13) BPZ75/12 high-pressure pump; (14) water storage tank; (15) pure manual self-made vibrating grid plate; (16) TSI9565-P multifunction anemometer; (17) connection with the municipal pipe network.The dust subsystem of the experimental system is composed of an AG410 dry powder aerosol diffuser and 150-mesh mineral dust. The dedusting fan in the ventilation subsystem is GP-315, which provides stable air flow for the experiments. A TSI9565-P multifunction anemometer is used to measure air speed. The spray subsystem is composed of a SS-10w stainless steel nozzle, BPZ75/12 high-pressure pump, rotor flowmeter, DX801XB00150 digital pressure gauge, and a water supply pipe, which provide water and air pressure and water and gas flow under different working conditions. The vibrating grid plate in the vibrating chord grid dust removal subsystem has two specifications: one is made of steel wire with diameters of 0.35 and 0.75 mm, and the other is made of steel wire with diameters of 0.35 and 0.1 mm and a filter area of 590 × 550 mm. The water mist and film attach to the vibrating wire grid plate. The drainage subsystem is set at the bottom of the roadway model. Droplets are ejected from the nozzle, flow from the vibrating grid plate, and are discharged from the drain at the model bottom. The wet chord grid filter dedusting section (where the spray dust removal system is located) is made of high-strength plexiglass and other sections are made of stainless steel.


### 3.2. Experimental Scheme and Results

#### 3.2.1. Experimental Scheme

Tap water is used as the working medium. Considering the actual situation of mine water pressure system and limited water source, the equipment pressurizes the water to five pressure conditions commonly found in mines: 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9, and 1.1 MPa. Considering that the engineering application site is mine return-air roadway, according to the actual situation of the project site, combined with the needs of the experiment, the wind speed is set to 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, and 5 m/s. Two kinds of vibrating wire grid dust removal resistance are studied using different filling rates, wind speeds, and water pressure conditions. The resistance measurement points are arranged prior to and after the experiments. Local and frictional resistance loss is considered negligible. To improve measurement accuracy, the data collection points were symmetrically arranged using the geometric center of the chord grid as the coordinate origin. Fifteen pairs of measuring points were arranged on either side of the grid for a total of 30 points. Owing to space limitations, this study only analyzes pairs of measuring points that are 3.05 m from the geometric center for a total of 50 data groups.


#### 3.2.2. Analysis of Experimental Results

(1) Effect of wind speed on dust removal resistance: the grid resistance increases from 32.5% and 77.8% when the filling rate is increased from 3 to 5 m/s under a spray pressure of 0.3 MPa. Figure4(a) compares dedusting resistance at variable filling rate and constant spray pressure. Larger filling rates are associated with smaller dust removal resistance. This is because small filling rates more easily produce vortex phenomena owing to the inverse gradient pressure, which increases the inertia resistance. The dedusting resistance increases linearly with increasing wind speed. When the wind speed is 3 m/s, the resistance of 32.5% filling rate is 35.8 Pa and a 77.8% filling rate at the minimum resistance is 27.5 Pa. The grid resistance under filling rates of 32.5% and 77.8% increases when the spray pressure increases from 0.3 to 0.5 MPa under a wind speed of 5 m/s (Figure 4(b)). Dust removal resistance is larger when using a filling rate of 32.5% compared with a 77.8% filling rate to a maximum of 6 Pa. This behavior continues with increasing spray pressure; however, the extent of resistance change decreases (Figures 4(c)–4(e)). The maximum resistance increment is 8.8 Pa for a filling rate of 77.8% at a wind speed of 4 m/s and 2.8 Pa at a wind speed of 4.5 m/s. The average value of vibrating chord grid increase is 3.78 Pa when the filling rate is 77.8%.Figure 4
Spray pressure and variable wind speeds. (a) 0.3 MPa. (b) 0.5 MPa. (c) 0.7 MPa. (d) 0.9 MPa. (e) 1.1 MPa.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)The results show that resistance increases with spray wind speed at constant spray pressure. The dust removal resistance with a filling rate of 77.8% is substantially smaller than that with a filling rate of 32.5%. The dedusting resistance is smallest when the wind speed is 3 m/s, which combines with the actual demand for wind speed during mine production. The optimal wind speed is 3.5 m/s, under which the dust removal cost is low and little influence is exerted on the mine ventilation system, making these conditions suitable for application in mine dust removal. The dedusting resistance and maneuverability should be taken into account to ensure dedusting efficiency. In summary, a wind speed of 3.5 m/s and filling rate of 77.8% are recommended for application in engineering projects.(2) Effect of spray pressure on dust removal resistance: resistance characteristics of the grid plate over a spray pressure range of 0.3 to 1.1 MPa are shown in Figures5(a)–5(e).(1)
At the position (3.05, 0), larger spray pressure yields higher resistance. Dedusting resistance increases continuously with increasing wind speed. At a wind speed of 3 m/s, the resistance is lower when the filling rate is 77.8% compared with 32.5% but the difference is only 8.3 Pa. This difference increases to 23 Pa at a wind speed of 5 m/s.(2)
The grid under a fixed filling rate has higher resistance under high wind speeds than that at low wind speed. However, in practical applications, the wind speed cannot be too low owing to practicality and to not disrupt normal production.(3)
For a grid plate with a filling rate of 77.8% and wind speed of 3 m/s, the average dust removal resistance is 34.02 Pa. With the change of wind speed to 3.5 m/s, the average dust removal resistance is 50.82 Pa. The average resistance is least affected when the spray pressure is 0.3 MPa, followed by 17.1 Pa at 0.7 MPa. Water film formation is not conducive under spray pressure conditions of 0.3 MPa. However, resistance substantially increases under other spray pressures with an optimum value of 0.7 MPa.Figure 5
Wind speed and variable spray pressure. (a) 3 m/s. (b) 3.5 m/s. (c) 4 m/s. (d) 4.5 m/s. (e) 5 m/s.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)The results presented here show that dust removal resistance increases slightly with increasing spray pressure. A spray pressure of 0.3 MPa yields the smallest resistance, which matches dust removal efficiency requirements. However, the dedusting cost is lower when the spray pressure is 0.7 MPa and this setup has little influence on the mine ventilation system, which makes it suitable for use in mines. Considering the control of water consumption and atomization pressure, the dust removal resistance and feasibility should be taken into account based on long-lasting dedusting efficiency. A spray pressure of 0.7 MPa and filling rate of 77.8% are recommended.


### 3.3. Comparison between Calculations and Experimental Data

To verify the accuracy of the theoretical expression of dust removal resistance, we analyze a system with a spray pressure of 0.7 MPa, wind speed between 3 and 5 m/s, and filling rate of 77.8%. Compared with the experimental data (Figure5(c)), the dust reduction remains constant at a spray pressure of 0.7 MPa (Figure 6). The theoretical and experimental resistance values increase similarly with wind speed, which verifies that the theoretical curve can correctly describe resistance characteristics. However, differences between experimental and theoretical values become more apparent under higher wind speeds. This is because the theoretical value assumes ideal conditions, where only the static chord grid parameters and air flow velocity are considered, whereas in the experiments, the vibration amplitude of the chord grid increases with wind speed and the water film is compressed, resulting in a larger resistance gap.Figure 6
Comparison between theoretical resistance and experimental resistance under a water pressure of 0.7 MPa.


## 3.1. Experimental System and Scheme

Dust-containing air in the return-air roadway of a mine is simulated through a vibrating chord grid dedusting system, as shown in Figure3. The experimental system is composed of the following subsystems: dust, ventilation, spray, vibrating chord grid dust removal, and drainage. The vibrating string grid dust removal subsystem located in the middle of the apparatus is mainly composed of the vibrating string steel wire, water mist, and water film attached to the wire. The roadway model is made of 10 mm thick high-strength plexiglass to facilitate observation.Figure 3
Test system of the wet vibrating string grille filter and dust removal. (1) AG410 dry powder aerosol diffuser; (2) rotor flowmeter; (3) gate valve; (4) pressure switch; (5) air compressor; (6) pitot tube; (7) rubber tube; (8) TSI pressure gauge; (9) CCZ-20 dust sampler; (10) SS-10w stainless steel nozzle; (11) DX801XB00150 digital pressure gauge; (12) intelligent electromagnetic flowmeter. (13) BPZ75/12 high-pressure pump; (14) water storage tank; (15) pure manual self-made vibrating grid plate; (16) TSI9565-P multifunction anemometer; (17) connection with the municipal pipe network.The dust subsystem of the experimental system is composed of an AG410 dry powder aerosol diffuser and 150-mesh mineral dust. The dedusting fan in the ventilation subsystem is GP-315, which provides stable air flow for the experiments. A TSI9565-P multifunction anemometer is used to measure air speed. The spray subsystem is composed of a SS-10w stainless steel nozzle, BPZ75/12 high-pressure pump, rotor flowmeter, DX801XB00150 digital pressure gauge, and a water supply pipe, which provide water and air pressure and water and gas flow under different working conditions. The vibrating grid plate in the vibrating chord grid dust removal subsystem has two specifications: one is made of steel wire with diameters of 0.35 and 0.75 mm, and the other is made of steel wire with diameters of 0.35 and 0.1 mm and a filter area of 590 × 550 mm. The water mist and film attach to the vibrating wire grid plate. The drainage subsystem is set at the bottom of the roadway model. Droplets are ejected from the nozzle, flow from the vibrating grid plate, and are discharged from the drain at the model bottom. The wet chord grid filter dedusting section (where the spray dust removal system is located) is made of high-strength plexiglass and other sections are made of stainless steel.


## 3.2. Experimental Scheme and Results

### 3.2.1. Experimental Scheme

Tap water is used as the working medium. Considering the actual situation of mine water pressure system and limited water source, the equipment pressurizes the water to five pressure conditions commonly found in mines: 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9, and 1.1 MPa. Considering that the engineering application site is mine return-air roadway, according to the actual situation of the project site, combined with the needs of the experiment, the wind speed is set to 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, and 5 m/s. Two kinds of vibrating wire grid dust removal resistance are studied using different filling rates, wind speeds, and water pressure conditions. The resistance measurement points are arranged prior to and after the experiments. Local and frictional resistance loss is considered negligible. To improve measurement accuracy, the data collection points were symmetrically arranged using the geometric center of the chord grid as the coordinate origin. Fifteen pairs of measuring points were arranged on either side of the grid for a total of 30 points. Owing to space limitations, this study only analyzes pairs of measuring points that are 3.05 m from the geometric center for a total of 50 data groups.


### 3.2.2. Analysis of Experimental Results

(1) Effect of wind speed on dust removal resistance: the grid resistance increases from 32.5% and 77.8% when the filling rate is increased from 3 to 5 m/s under a spray pressure of 0.3 MPa. Figure4(a) compares dedusting resistance at variable filling rate and constant spray pressure. Larger filling rates are associated with smaller dust removal resistance. This is because small filling rates more easily produce vortex phenomena owing to the inverse gradient pressure, which increases the inertia resistance. The dedusting resistance increases linearly with increasing wind speed. When the wind speed is 3 m/s, the resistance of 32.5% filling rate is 35.8 Pa and a 77.8% filling rate at the minimum resistance is 27.5 Pa. The grid resistance under filling rates of 32.5% and 77.8% increases when the spray pressure increases from 0.3 to 0.5 MPa under a wind speed of 5 m/s (Figure 4(b)). Dust removal resistance is larger when using a filling rate of 32.5% compared with a 77.8% filling rate to a maximum of 6 Pa. This behavior continues with increasing spray pressure; however, the extent of resistance change decreases (Figures 4(c)–4(e)). The maximum resistance increment is 8.8 Pa for a filling rate of 77.8% at a wind speed of 4 m/s and 2.8 Pa at a wind speed of 4.5 m/s. The average value of vibrating chord grid increase is 3.78 Pa when the filling rate is 77.8%.Figure 4
Spray pressure and variable wind speeds. (a) 0.3 MPa. (b) 0.5 MPa. (c) 0.7 MPa. (d) 0.9 MPa. (e) 1.1 MPa.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)The results show that resistance increases with spray wind speed at constant spray pressure. The dust removal resistance with a filling rate of 77.8% is substantially smaller than that with a filling rate of 32.5%. The dedusting resistance is smallest when the wind speed is 3 m/s, which combines with the actual demand for wind speed during mine production. The optimal wind speed is 3.5 m/s, under which the dust removal cost is low and little influence is exerted on the mine ventilation system, making these conditions suitable for application in mine dust removal. The dedusting resistance and maneuverability should be taken into account to ensure dedusting efficiency. In summary, a wind speed of 3.5 m/s and filling rate of 77.8% are recommended for application in engineering projects.(2) Effect of spray pressure on dust removal resistance: resistance characteristics of the grid plate over a spray pressure range of 0.3 to 1.1 MPa are shown in Figures5(a)–5(e).(1)
At the position (3.05, 0), larger spray pressure yields higher resistance. Dedusting resistance increases continuously with increasing wind speed. At a wind speed of 3 m/s, the resistance is lower when the filling rate is 77.8% compared with 32.5% but the difference is only 8.3 Pa. This difference increases to 23 Pa at a wind speed of 5 m/s.(2)
The grid under a fixed filling rate has higher resistance under high wind speeds than that at low wind speed. However, in practical applications, the wind speed cannot be too low owing to practicality and to not disrupt normal production.(3)
For a grid plate with a filling rate of 77.8% and wind speed of 3 m/s, the average dust removal resistance is 34.02 Pa. With the change of wind speed to 3.5 m/s, the average dust removal resistance is 50.82 Pa. The average resistance is least affected when the spray pressure is 0.3 MPa, followed by 17.1 Pa at 0.7 MPa. Water film formation is not conducive under spray pressure conditions of 0.3 MPa. However, resistance substantially increases under other spray pressures with an optimum value of 0.7 MPa.Figure 5
Wind speed and variable spray pressure. (a) 3 m/s. (b) 3.5 m/s. (c) 4 m/s. (d) 4.5 m/s. (e) 5 m/s.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)The results presented here show that dust removal resistance increases slightly with increasing spray pressure. A spray pressure of 0.3 MPa yields the smallest resistance, which matches dust removal efficiency requirements. However, the dedusting cost is lower when the spray pressure is 0.7 MPa and this setup has little influence on the mine ventilation system, which makes it suitable for use in mines. Considering the control of water consumption and atomization pressure, the dust removal resistance and feasibility should be taken into account based on long-lasting dedusting efficiency. A spray pressure of 0.7 MPa and filling rate of 77.8% are recommended.


## 3.2.1. Experimental Scheme

Tap water is used as the working medium. Considering the actual situation of mine water pressure system and limited water source, the equipment pressurizes the water to five pressure conditions commonly found in mines: 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9, and 1.1 MPa. Considering that the engineering application site is mine return-air roadway, according to the actual situation of the project site, combined with the needs of the experiment, the wind speed is set to 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, and 5 m/s. Two kinds of vibrating wire grid dust removal resistance are studied using different filling rates, wind speeds, and water pressure conditions. The resistance measurement points are arranged prior to and after the experiments. Local and frictional resistance loss is considered negligible. To improve measurement accuracy, the data collection points were symmetrically arranged using the geometric center of the chord grid as the coordinate origin. Fifteen pairs of measuring points were arranged on either side of the grid for a total of 30 points. Owing to space limitations, this study only analyzes pairs of measuring points that are 3.05 m from the geometric center for a total of 50 data groups.


## 3.2.2. Analysis of Experimental Results

(1) Effect of wind speed on dust removal resistance: the grid resistance increases from 32.5% and 77.8% when the filling rate is increased from 3 to 5 m/s under a spray pressure of 0.3 MPa. Figure4(a) compares dedusting resistance at variable filling rate and constant spray pressure. Larger filling rates are associated with smaller dust removal resistance. This is because small filling rates more easily produce vortex phenomena owing to the inverse gradient pressure, which increases the inertia resistance. The dedusting resistance increases linearly with increasing wind speed. When the wind speed is 3 m/s, the resistance of 32.5% filling rate is 35.8 Pa and a 77.8% filling rate at the minimum resistance is 27.5 Pa. The grid resistance under filling rates of 32.5% and 77.8% increases when the spray pressure increases from 0.3 to 0.5 MPa under a wind speed of 5 m/s (Figure 4(b)). Dust removal resistance is larger when using a filling rate of 32.5% compared with a 77.8% filling rate to a maximum of 6 Pa. This behavior continues with increasing spray pressure; however, the extent of resistance change decreases (Figures 4(c)–4(e)). The maximum resistance increment is 8.8 Pa for a filling rate of 77.8% at a wind speed of 4 m/s and 2.8 Pa at a wind speed of 4.5 m/s. The average value of vibrating chord grid increase is 3.78 Pa when the filling rate is 77.8%.Figure 4
Spray pressure and variable wind speeds. (a) 0.3 MPa. (b) 0.5 MPa. (c) 0.7 MPa. (d) 0.9 MPa. (e) 1.1 MPa.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)The results show that resistance increases with spray wind speed at constant spray pressure. The dust removal resistance with a filling rate of 77.8% is substantially smaller than that with a filling rate of 32.5%. The dedusting resistance is smallest when the wind speed is 3 m/s, which combines with the actual demand for wind speed during mine production. The optimal wind speed is 3.5 m/s, under which the dust removal cost is low and little influence is exerted on the mine ventilation system, making these conditions suitable for application in mine dust removal. The dedusting resistance and maneuverability should be taken into account to ensure dedusting efficiency. In summary, a wind speed of 3.5 m/s and filling rate of 77.8% are recommended for application in engineering projects.(2) Effect of spray pressure on dust removal resistance: resistance characteristics of the grid plate over a spray pressure range of 0.3 to 1.1 MPa are shown in Figures5(a)–5(e).(1)
At the position (3.05, 0), larger spray pressure yields higher resistance. Dedusting resistance increases continuously with increasing wind speed. At a wind speed of 3 m/s, the resistance is lower when the filling rate is 77.8% compared with 32.5% but the difference is only 8.3 Pa. This difference increases to 23 Pa at a wind speed of 5 m/s.(2)
The grid under a fixed filling rate has higher resistance under high wind speeds than that at low wind speed. However, in practical applications, the wind speed cannot be too low owing to practicality and to not disrupt normal production.(3)
For a grid plate with a filling rate of 77.8% and wind speed of 3 m/s, the average dust removal resistance is 34.02 Pa. With the change of wind speed to 3.5 m/s, the average dust removal resistance is 50.82 Pa. The average resistance is least affected when the spray pressure is 0.3 MPa, followed by 17.1 Pa at 0.7 MPa. Water film formation is not conducive under spray pressure conditions of 0.3 MPa. However, resistance substantially increases under other spray pressures with an optimum value of 0.7 MPa.Figure 5
Wind speed and variable spray pressure. (a) 3 m/s. (b) 3.5 m/s. (c) 4 m/s. (d) 4.5 m/s. (e) 5 m/s.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)The results presented here show that dust removal resistance increases slightly with increasing spray pressure. A spray pressure of 0.3 MPa yields the smallest resistance, which matches dust removal efficiency requirements. However, the dedusting cost is lower when the spray pressure is 0.7 MPa and this setup has little influence on the mine ventilation system, which makes it suitable for use in mines. Considering the control of water consumption and atomization pressure, the dust removal resistance and feasibility should be taken into account based on long-lasting dedusting efficiency. A spray pressure of 0.7 MPa and filling rate of 77.8% are recommended.


## 3.3. Comparison between Calculations and Experimental Data

To verify the accuracy of the theoretical expression of dust removal resistance, we analyze a system with a spray pressure of 0.7 MPa, wind speed between 3 and 5 m/s, and filling rate of 77.8%. Compared with the experimental data (Figure5(c)), the dust reduction remains constant at a spray pressure of 0.7 MPa (Figure 6). The theoretical and experimental resistance values increase similarly with wind speed, which verifies that the theoretical curve can correctly describe resistance characteristics. However, differences between experimental and theoretical values become more apparent under higher wind speeds. This is because the theoretical value assumes ideal conditions, where only the static chord grid parameters and air flow velocity are considered, whereas in the experiments, the vibration amplitude of the chord grid increases with wind speed and the water film is compressed, resulting in a larger resistance gap.Figure 6
Comparison between theoretical resistance and experimental resistance under a water pressure of 0.7 MPa.


## 4. Conclusion

(1)
It is assumed that there is no heat exchange on the surface of vibrating wire, and the water film of chord grid is uniformly distributed. By using the continuity equation and momentum equation, the friction resistance and inertia resistance are derived. The total dust removal resistance of the vibrating string grid is obtained when the dust flows around the wet vibrating wire.(2)
On the experimental platform, under the working conditions of constant spray pressure and wind speed of 3–5 m for two different specifications of resonant chord grid, it is concluded that the dedusting resistance of vibrating chord grid with high filling rate is less than that of low filling rate and that the dedusting resistance of vibrating string grid with high filling rate is less than that of low filling rate under the condition of constant wind speed and spray pressure of 0.3–1.1 MPa. The change of the experimental test value is about the same as that calculated by the theoretical formula.(3)
According to the theoretical derivation and experimental data, a chord grid with a filling rate of 77.8% should be adopted in the mine return-air roadway with a spray pressure of 0.7 MPa and optimum air speed of 3.5 m/s.



---

*Source: 6682988-2021-02-05.xml*