# Experimental Study on the Effect of Long-Term Water Injection on Micropore Structure of Ultralow Permeability Sandstone Reservoir

Authors: Shiyuan Qu; Hanqiao Jiang; Junjian Li; Lin Zhao; Changhui Wu
Journal: Geofluids
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

During the long-term waterflooding (LTWF) in oil reservoirs, the formation is subject to permeability reduction as clay release and fine migration. At present, the mechanisms of permeability impairment in both macroscopic and microscopic pore structures in ultralow permeability reservoirs under LTWF are unclear. This statement epitomizes the main objective of this work: to understand how long-term waterflood changes porous structures and thus compromises permeability. The standard core flow experiments in conjunction with a couple of tests consisting of online nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), high-pressure mercury intrusive penetration (HPMIP), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning electron microscope (SEM) were performed to determine the mineral compositions, macrophysical properties, and micropore structures of two kinds of cores with different natures of pore distribution (i.e., unimodal and bimodal) before and after LTWF in Yan Chang field China. Results showed that the permeability decreased while the porosity increased after the LTWF. With respect to the pore size distribution, the small pores (SPs) decreased and the large pores (LPs) increased for both cores. For the unimodal core, the distribution curve shifted upwards with little change in the radius of the connected pores. For the bimodal core, the curve shifted to the right with an increasing radius of connected pores. With respect to the characteristic parameters, the average pore radius, median pore radius, structural coefficient, and tortuosity increased, while the relative sorting coefficient decreased. The relative changes of the parameters for the unimodal core were much smaller than those for the bimodal core. With respect to the clays, chlorite accounted for a majority proportion of the clays, and its content increased after LTWF. According to these changes, the mechanism of LTWF at different stages was interpreted. At the early stages, the blockage of the released clays occurred in SPs. Some of the middle pores (MPs) and LPs became larger due to the release and some of them became smaller due to the accumulation. At the middle stage, the blockage of SPs weakened. Some flow channels formed by MPs and LPs became dominant flow channels gradually. The effluxes of particles occurred, resulting in a significant increase in porosity. At the late stage, the stable flow channels have formed. The higher response of the bimodal core to LTWF could be attributed to its higher content of chlorite, which was more likely to accumulate. This study clarifies the mechanism of fine-migration-induced formation damage in microscopic pore structures and the migration pattern of clay minerals in ultralow permeability reservoirs. The work provides potential guidance for optimizing waterflood strategies in ultralow permeability reservoirs.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

After natural depletion, water flooding is universally recognized as an effective method to realize an additional production of oil [1–3]. Regarding extralow permeability reservoirs at the middle and later periods of water injection development, however, the sharp rise of injection pressure and difficulty in water injection hinder the expected performance [4–6]. The production cost and irreversible permeability reduction induced by reservoir damage are up to USD 140 billion a year [7]. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out systematic research on the changes of pore throat structure and its mechanism in the low-permeability reservoir during the LTWF process, to provide a reference for the prevention of reservoir damage.The influence of LTWF on low-permeability reservoirs has attracted more and more attention recently. With the increase of injected water, the water saturation climbs, and under long-term water erosion, the reservoir physical properties change, especially the porosity and permeability. Li and Xu [8] compared the influence of LTWF between high-permeability and low-permeability reservoirs by water flooding experiment. Results show that the pore connectivity of high-permeability reservoir would be improved after LTWF, while the permeability reduction of low-permeability reservoir would exist due to the throat blockage caused by fine migration. Du et al. [9–11] came to the similar conclusion through various experimental means and field data studies; that is, there would be enhancement in physical property in high-permeability reservoirs, while the damage would occur in low-permeability reservoirs after LTWF. Regarding the problem, scholars have carried out related researches using experiments and field data, but they only studied the damage degree of LTWF to low-permeability cores of different permeability levels, as well as the impact of flooding parameters (e.g., water injection speed) on the degree of damage [12–14]. At present, there is no systematic experimental method to study the reservoir damage dynamics caused by LTWF, and the damage mechanism of low-permeability reservoirs also remains unclear.The reservoir damage from water flooding is usually associated with fines migration. In fact, the change of formation fluid alters the rock surface charge, which causes particles such as clay to fall off from the rock surface and migrate with the formation fluid. In the process of migration, the particles may undergo physical settlement due to the stagnation of the fluid flow. Eventually, the particles may accumulate in the throat, preventing fluid flow and leading to the loss of permeability. Yu et al. [15] studied the water damage caused by the dispersed migration of kaolinite minerals in Berea sandstone by the core flooding test and found that the critical salinity is only related to the type of cation, but has nothing to do with the type and velocity of the anion. The critical salinity of the divalent cation is very small, and the critical salinity of univalent cation drops with the decrease of hydration ion radius. The critical salinity is the salinity when the permeability ratio of posttreated permeability to primary permeability starts inflecting [16]. Omar et al. [17, 18] further considered that water-sensitive damage was related to the type and content of exchangeable cations in clay minerals. Wilson et al. [19, 20] reviewed the role of single clay minerals in formation damage caused by fine particle migration, and kaolinite and illite (including mixed illite/montmorillonite) were identified as the main source of particles for migration. However, the role of montmorillonite and chlorite in formation damage still remains unclear. Although the formation damage tests in bottles proved that montmorillonite could expand and form a gelatinous substance under the action of water, which had the potential of causing permeability loss, the molecular simulation tested by Odriozola and Guevara-Rodríguez [21] suggested that such montmorillonite expansion is almost impossible in actual reservoirs. In brief, for low-permeability reservoirs, although the permeability loss caused by long-term water injection has been confirmed in field practice and core flooding experiments, its permeability loss mechanism has not yet been clarified. Hence, on the basis of evaluating the permeability loss degree in the process of water injection, it is necessary to establish new systematic experimental methods to further visualize the dynamic changes of pore structure and clay minerals in the process of water injection, to reveal the permeability loss mechanism.The original experimental methods used to study the mechanism of reservoir damage mainly include electron microscopy (SEM) [22], X-ray diffraction (XRD) [23], and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) [24]. Although these methods can provide an intuitive and quantitative means to study the dynamic changes of clay minerals in the core, they all need to destroy the samples in the process of analysis, which usually requires lots of experiments to statistically compare the changes of pore structure and clay minerals before and after the formation damage. Due to the strong heterogeneity of the reservoir, many scholars have drawn contradictory conclusions through these research methods [4, 7]. In recent years, the emergence of a large number of advanced research methods can do help for clarifying the oil-water-rock mechanisms at the pore scale. Through the method of core flooding tests coupled with micro-CT scans [25], the dynamic changes of pore structure in the water injection process of sandstone were revealed. However, this method uses the watershed algorithm to determine the threshold value to separate the fluids and pores, and the final result is very sensitive to the selection of threshold values; the reliability of the research conclusion remains to be verified [26]. In addition, the existing experimental equipment capable of micro-CT scanning coupled with core flooding tests cannot meet the scanning resolution requirements of low-permeability core. Micromodel is another effective way to visualize the actions between fluids and rock [27, 28]. Bartels et al. [29] intuitively showed the influence of clay minerals on the wettability of the formation through a micromodel modified by clay minerals. Sharifipour et al. [30] visualized the permeability loss caused by clay mineral migration and expansion using a microfluidic model. However, the microfluidic model fails to simulate the mechanisms of formation damage caused by particle migration due to the simple pore structure of the micromodel [31, 32]. Currently, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [33, 34] and Quantitative Evaluation of Minerals by SCANning (QEMSCAN) [35] are capable of accurately characterizing the pore structure and mineral migration during core flooding tests. Fang et al. [36] established a set of core flooding coupled with NMR scans and made quantitative analysis of pore structure change during alkali flooding by utilizing the advantages of NMR in nondestructive detection of pore structure of low-permeability core with the high identification accuracy. Therefore, NMR analysis of cores before and after water flooding can also be used to determine the effects of water flooding on the pore structure of cores. QEMSCAN is an automatic mineralogical identification method combining high-resolution SEM, XRD, and database technology [37], which scans and identifies minerals in core sections. Zhao et al. [35] used QEMSCAN to study the migration of clay minerals before and after water flooding and its effects on pore structures.Based on the above research, the paper proposed an integrated experimental method, which can not only quantitatively evaluate the changes of pore throat structure during water injection in a low permeability reservoir but also reveals the mechanisms of permeability loss at the pore scale. The NMR, high-pressure mercury injection (HPMIP), XRD, and SEM were integrated into the core displacement experiment to ensure the accuracy of the experimental results, of which NMR and HPMIP were used to quantitatively evaluate the changes of pore structure before and after water injection, while XRD and SEM were used to analyze the dynamic changes of clay minerals before and after water flooding.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Cores

The cores involved in this study were sampled from Chang VIII formation of Ordos Basin in western China. The Chang VIII formation is undergoing a WF since 2011, resulting in some property changes to its ultralow-permeability sandstones physically. The geological properties of the formation are listed in Table1. From the pore-scale perspective, the rock matrix was composed of quartz, K-feldspar, plagioclase, feldspar, and clays, among which the intergranular-type pores were formed. For another, the pore-size distribution presented two typical types, i.e., unimodal and bimodal. Aiming at a rigorous study, two cores differing in pore size distribution (C9 unimodal and C11 bimodal, respectively) but being on the same permeability level were sampled from a fresh well whose vicinity rocks were never exposed to water, avoiding the subsurface water flush to the rocks. The connate fluids within the cores were extracted by inorganic salts and hydrocarbons, after which the cores were dried in a thermotank under 55°C until reaching stable core weight.Table 1
Geological properties of the Chang VIII formation.
PropertyValueUnitDepth1450mThickness10-20mAverage porosity10.2%Average permeability0.35mPore pressure6.51MPaOverburden pressure12.5MPaReservoir temperature56.64°CWater salinity25395ppmAfter sampling, both the homogeneous cores were cut into dual parts vertically for direct comparison between the states of the core before-LTWF and after-LTWF (see Figure1). Accordingly, the four new subcores were named C9-1, C9-2, C11-1, and C11-2. The four subcores were cleaned and dried again to remove the movable fines produced during the cutting process. After that, the four cores were saturated by evacuating and then admitting the deaerated simulated connate water. The core permeability was calculated by Darcy’s law after performing the standard flow experiment. Besides, the core porosity was evaluated by the weight-difference method. The permeability and porosity of the cores are listed in Table 2. It shows that the permeability and porosity of dual subcores are almost the same, providing favorable conditions for comparison. Besides, C9 and C11 are on the same property levels although they present different pore-size distributions. The four cores were involved in different tests (see Section 2.3).Figure 1
Illustration of the cores and slices.Table 2
Basic core information.
CoresLength (cm)Diameter (cm)Permeability (mD)Porosity (%)C9-13.012.510.36210.37C9-23.042.510.36510.42C11-13.092.510.37410.79C11-23.072.510.37810.84


### 2.2. Fluids

The flooding fluid in this study was simulated connate water prepared by reagent grade chemicals corresponding to the ionic components (see Table3). The total salinity of the water was 25261 ppm, which was on a medium level. Besides, the water is neutral with a pH of 6.89.Table 3
Ionic components of connate water.
IonNa+ +K+Ca2+Mg2+Ba2+ + Sr2+Cl−SO22-HCO3−Salinity (ppm)8738551243172138881465204


### 2.3. Procedure

The experiments in this study consisted of preexperiment, formal experiments, and postexperiments operated on C9-1/C11-1, C9-2/C11-2, and C9-2/C11-2, respectively. The experiments on C9 were performed first, and the same ones were repeated on C11. The following descriptions then take C9 as an example.


#### 2.3.1. Preexperiment

The preexperiment involved four tests performed on C9-1. The tests started with splitting the C9-1 into two parts, where part II was a slice with a thickness of 1 cm and part I was the rest (see Figure1).The tests operated on part II consisted of the SEM test and XRD test to acquire the pore structure images and mineral proportions, respectively. The SEM test was performed on a piece that was cut from part II and coated with a thin carbon layer, where the coating ensured a clear scanning image. The XRD test was conducted on the rest of part II by using the multifunction X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku TTRIII, Japan).The NMR test and HPMIP test were performed on part I sequentially. The NMR test was performed using the NMR analyzer (SPEC-RC1). According to the NMR principle, theT2 spectrum can reflect the pore size distribution. The x-value of the T2 spectrum, namely, the relaxation time, increased with the pore radius, while the y-value representing the signal amplitude increased with the total pore volume under a specific radius. However, it is required to scale the T2 spectrum to obtain the real pore-size distribution curve. Hereby, the HPMIP curve was selected as the reference. The HPMIP test was carried out by an automatic mercury intrusion meter (AutoPore IV 9505, USA) allowing a maximum injection pressure of 200 MPa. During the injection, the capillary pressure between mercury and air was as follows:
(1)Pc=2σcosθr,where Pc denotes the capillary pressure, σ denotes the surface tension between mercury and air (480 dyn/cm), θ was the wetting angle between mercury and rock (140°C), and r was the pore radius. According to the mercury volumes injected into the pores under varying capillary pressures, the real pore-size distribution curve can be obtained. The relaxation time in the T2 spectrum can be transformed to the pore radius through the linear scaling:
(2)T2=C∙r,where C is the scaling coefficient. C was calculated by fitting the cumulative frequency curves. The T2 cumulative frequency curve was constructed from the part of the T2 data conforming to the segment of mercury saturation, and the real cumulative frequency curve was obtained by the HPMIP data.


#### 2.3.2. Formal Experiment

In the formal experiment, the online NMR test was performed in conjunction with the core flow experiment. Differing from the standard flow experiment, the core holder was made of fiberglass to eliminate the magnetic effect of the traditional metallic core holder. For another, the core holder was placed inside the magnetic body of the online NMR system. The experimental setup is shown in Figure2.Figure 2
Setup for the formal experiments.Before the experiment, the C9-2 saturated by simulated connate water was pushed into the core holder, after which the fluorine oil was pumped into the annular space of the holder manually to impose the confining pressure without signal interference of hydrogen on the NMR test.During the experiment, the water flowed through the core continuously at a stable flux of 0.01 mL/min provided by the ISCO pump (Isco 260D). Meanwhile, the online NMR tests were conducted along with the flooding process simultaneously, which enabled the in situ pore-size evaluations. The entire flowing process lasted for a period of 600 PV to simulate the LTWF. The experimental temperature was controlled at 56°C.The upstream pressure and the NMRT2 spectrum were recorded at the flooding time of 0 PV, 200 PV, 400 PV, and 600 PV to evaluate the changes of permeability and pore size distribution in the LTWF process.


#### 2.3.3. Postexperiment

In the postexperiment, the operations and four tests of the preexperiment were repeated on C9-2 that has experienced a formal experiment, i.e., the LTWF of 600 PV (see Figure2). Combining the testing results of pre- and postexperiment, the change of pores and minerals after the LTWF could be evaluated both qualitatively and quantitatively.


## 2.1. Cores

The cores involved in this study were sampled from Chang VIII formation of Ordos Basin in western China. The Chang VIII formation is undergoing a WF since 2011, resulting in some property changes to its ultralow-permeability sandstones physically. The geological properties of the formation are listed in Table1. From the pore-scale perspective, the rock matrix was composed of quartz, K-feldspar, plagioclase, feldspar, and clays, among which the intergranular-type pores were formed. For another, the pore-size distribution presented two typical types, i.e., unimodal and bimodal. Aiming at a rigorous study, two cores differing in pore size distribution (C9 unimodal and C11 bimodal, respectively) but being on the same permeability level were sampled from a fresh well whose vicinity rocks were never exposed to water, avoiding the subsurface water flush to the rocks. The connate fluids within the cores were extracted by inorganic salts and hydrocarbons, after which the cores were dried in a thermotank under 55°C until reaching stable core weight.Table 1
Geological properties of the Chang VIII formation.
PropertyValueUnitDepth1450mThickness10-20mAverage porosity10.2%Average permeability0.35mPore pressure6.51MPaOverburden pressure12.5MPaReservoir temperature56.64°CWater salinity25395ppmAfter sampling, both the homogeneous cores were cut into dual parts vertically for direct comparison between the states of the core before-LTWF and after-LTWF (see Figure1). Accordingly, the four new subcores were named C9-1, C9-2, C11-1, and C11-2. The four subcores were cleaned and dried again to remove the movable fines produced during the cutting process. After that, the four cores were saturated by evacuating and then admitting the deaerated simulated connate water. The core permeability was calculated by Darcy’s law after performing the standard flow experiment. Besides, the core porosity was evaluated by the weight-difference method. The permeability and porosity of the cores are listed in Table 2. It shows that the permeability and porosity of dual subcores are almost the same, providing favorable conditions for comparison. Besides, C9 and C11 are on the same property levels although they present different pore-size distributions. The four cores were involved in different tests (see Section 2.3).Figure 1
Illustration of the cores and slices.Table 2
Basic core information.
CoresLength (cm)Diameter (cm)Permeability (mD)Porosity (%)C9-13.012.510.36210.37C9-23.042.510.36510.42C11-13.092.510.37410.79C11-23.072.510.37810.84


## 2.2. Fluids

The flooding fluid in this study was simulated connate water prepared by reagent grade chemicals corresponding to the ionic components (see Table3). The total salinity of the water was 25261 ppm, which was on a medium level. Besides, the water is neutral with a pH of 6.89.Table 3
Ionic components of connate water.
IonNa+ +K+Ca2+Mg2+Ba2+ + Sr2+Cl−SO22-HCO3−Salinity (ppm)8738551243172138881465204


## 2.3. Procedure

The experiments in this study consisted of preexperiment, formal experiments, and postexperiments operated on C9-1/C11-1, C9-2/C11-2, and C9-2/C11-2, respectively. The experiments on C9 were performed first, and the same ones were repeated on C11. The following descriptions then take C9 as an example.


### 2.3.1. Preexperiment

The preexperiment involved four tests performed on C9-1. The tests started with splitting the C9-1 into two parts, where part II was a slice with a thickness of 1 cm and part I was the rest (see Figure1).The tests operated on part II consisted of the SEM test and XRD test to acquire the pore structure images and mineral proportions, respectively. The SEM test was performed on a piece that was cut from part II and coated with a thin carbon layer, where the coating ensured a clear scanning image. The XRD test was conducted on the rest of part II by using the multifunction X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku TTRIII, Japan).The NMR test and HPMIP test were performed on part I sequentially. The NMR test was performed using the NMR analyzer (SPEC-RC1). According to the NMR principle, theT2 spectrum can reflect the pore size distribution. The x-value of the T2 spectrum, namely, the relaxation time, increased with the pore radius, while the y-value representing the signal amplitude increased with the total pore volume under a specific radius. However, it is required to scale the T2 spectrum to obtain the real pore-size distribution curve. Hereby, the HPMIP curve was selected as the reference. The HPMIP test was carried out by an automatic mercury intrusion meter (AutoPore IV 9505, USA) allowing a maximum injection pressure of 200 MPa. During the injection, the capillary pressure between mercury and air was as follows:
(1)Pc=2σcosθr,where Pc denotes the capillary pressure, σ denotes the surface tension between mercury and air (480 dyn/cm), θ was the wetting angle between mercury and rock (140°C), and r was the pore radius. According to the mercury volumes injected into the pores under varying capillary pressures, the real pore-size distribution curve can be obtained. The relaxation time in the T2 spectrum can be transformed to the pore radius through the linear scaling:
(2)T2=C∙r,where C is the scaling coefficient. C was calculated by fitting the cumulative frequency curves. The T2 cumulative frequency curve was constructed from the part of the T2 data conforming to the segment of mercury saturation, and the real cumulative frequency curve was obtained by the HPMIP data.


### 2.3.2. Formal Experiment

In the formal experiment, the online NMR test was performed in conjunction with the core flow experiment. Differing from the standard flow experiment, the core holder was made of fiberglass to eliminate the magnetic effect of the traditional metallic core holder. For another, the core holder was placed inside the magnetic body of the online NMR system. The experimental setup is shown in Figure2.Figure 2
Setup for the formal experiments.Before the experiment, the C9-2 saturated by simulated connate water was pushed into the core holder, after which the fluorine oil was pumped into the annular space of the holder manually to impose the confining pressure without signal interference of hydrogen on the NMR test.During the experiment, the water flowed through the core continuously at a stable flux of 0.01 mL/min provided by the ISCO pump (Isco 260D). Meanwhile, the online NMR tests were conducted along with the flooding process simultaneously, which enabled the in situ pore-size evaluations. The entire flowing process lasted for a period of 600 PV to simulate the LTWF. The experimental temperature was controlled at 56°C.The upstream pressure and the NMRT2 spectrum were recorded at the flooding time of 0 PV, 200 PV, 400 PV, and 600 PV to evaluate the changes of permeability and pore size distribution in the LTWF process.


### 2.3.3. Postexperiment

In the postexperiment, the operations and four tests of the preexperiment were repeated on C9-2 that has experienced a formal experiment, i.e., the LTWF of 600 PV (see Figure2). Combining the testing results of pre- and postexperiment, the change of pores and minerals after the LTWF could be evaluated both qualitatively and quantitatively.


## 2.3.1. Preexperiment

The preexperiment involved four tests performed on C9-1. The tests started with splitting the C9-1 into two parts, where part II was a slice with a thickness of 1 cm and part I was the rest (see Figure1).The tests operated on part II consisted of the SEM test and XRD test to acquire the pore structure images and mineral proportions, respectively. The SEM test was performed on a piece that was cut from part II and coated with a thin carbon layer, where the coating ensured a clear scanning image. The XRD test was conducted on the rest of part II by using the multifunction X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku TTRIII, Japan).The NMR test and HPMIP test were performed on part I sequentially. The NMR test was performed using the NMR analyzer (SPEC-RC1). According to the NMR principle, theT2 spectrum can reflect the pore size distribution. The x-value of the T2 spectrum, namely, the relaxation time, increased with the pore radius, while the y-value representing the signal amplitude increased with the total pore volume under a specific radius. However, it is required to scale the T2 spectrum to obtain the real pore-size distribution curve. Hereby, the HPMIP curve was selected as the reference. The HPMIP test was carried out by an automatic mercury intrusion meter (AutoPore IV 9505, USA) allowing a maximum injection pressure of 200 MPa. During the injection, the capillary pressure between mercury and air was as follows:
(1)Pc=2σcosθr,where Pc denotes the capillary pressure, σ denotes the surface tension between mercury and air (480 dyn/cm), θ was the wetting angle between mercury and rock (140°C), and r was the pore radius. According to the mercury volumes injected into the pores under varying capillary pressures, the real pore-size distribution curve can be obtained. The relaxation time in the T2 spectrum can be transformed to the pore radius through the linear scaling:
(2)T2=C∙r,where C is the scaling coefficient. C was calculated by fitting the cumulative frequency curves. The T2 cumulative frequency curve was constructed from the part of the T2 data conforming to the segment of mercury saturation, and the real cumulative frequency curve was obtained by the HPMIP data.


## 2.3.2. Formal Experiment

In the formal experiment, the online NMR test was performed in conjunction with the core flow experiment. Differing from the standard flow experiment, the core holder was made of fiberglass to eliminate the magnetic effect of the traditional metallic core holder. For another, the core holder was placed inside the magnetic body of the online NMR system. The experimental setup is shown in Figure2.Figure 2
Setup for the formal experiments.Before the experiment, the C9-2 saturated by simulated connate water was pushed into the core holder, after which the fluorine oil was pumped into the annular space of the holder manually to impose the confining pressure without signal interference of hydrogen on the NMR test.During the experiment, the water flowed through the core continuously at a stable flux of 0.01 mL/min provided by the ISCO pump (Isco 260D). Meanwhile, the online NMR tests were conducted along with the flooding process simultaneously, which enabled the in situ pore-size evaluations. The entire flowing process lasted for a period of 600 PV to simulate the LTWF. The experimental temperature was controlled at 56°C.The upstream pressure and the NMRT2 spectrum were recorded at the flooding time of 0 PV, 200 PV, 400 PV, and 600 PV to evaluate the changes of permeability and pore size distribution in the LTWF process.


## 2.3.3. Postexperiment

In the postexperiment, the operations and four tests of the preexperiment were repeated on C9-2 that has experienced a formal experiment, i.e., the LTWF of 600 PV (see Figure2). Combining the testing results of pre- and postexperiment, the change of pores and minerals after the LTWF could be evaluated both qualitatively and quantitatively.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Permeability and Porosity

During the water flooding experiment, the permeability and porosity of the core can be calculated using the differential pressure and the total signal amplitude of theT2 spectrum, respectively. The results are shown in Table 4.Table 4
Permeability and porosity information.
CoresWater flooding stage (PV)Injection pressure (MPa)Permeability (mD)Total signal amplitudePorosity (%)C9-200.128050.3651407.4810.422000.129510.3471410.1810.444000.129940.3421422.3410.536000.130030.3411426.3910.56C11-200.127360.3781528.8510.842000.131150.3321531.6710.864000.133250.3111537.3110.906000.133470.3091540.1310.92Herein, two indices were used to evaluate the variations of permeability and porosity during the LTWF process:(3)Ik=k−kiki×100%,Iφ=φ−φiφi,where Ik denotes the permeability index, Iφ denoted the porosity index, ki was the initial permeability, and φi was the initial porosity. The indices at four LTWF stages are plotted in Figure 3.Figure 3
Permeability index and porosity index during the LTWF.According to Figure3, the negative/positive index was observed for the permeability/porosity of both cores, indicating the decrease of permeability and the increase of porosity during the LTWF. Such phenomena were tallied with conventional wisdom from previous studies. The permeability dropped significantly before 400 PV but slightly in 400 PV~600 PV. As for the porosity, the most increment occurred in 200 PV~600 PV. For another, C9-2 showed higher responses to LTWF than C11-2 in terms of permeability, but lower responses in terms of porosity. Specifically, the relative permeability loss of C9-2 and C11-2 at the end of the LTWF was 6.57% and 18.3%, respectively. For the porosity, the maximum relative increment was 1.34% and 0.74%, respectively.


### 3.2. Pore-Size Distribution

The changes of pore size distribution were evaluated by theT2 spectrum in the formal experiment. As stated in Section 2.3.1, the linear scaling coefficient C was calculated by fitting the cumulative frequency curves. The curves are plotted in Figure 4, which showed good agreement between the T2 and real cumulative frequency curves for both cores. The least squares regression method was adopted, where the C of C9 and C of C11 were 70.12 and 61.17, respectively.Figure 4
The fitting of cumulative frequency curves.Figure5(a) illustrates the curves of the pore-size distribution of C9-2 at four sequential LTWF stages. It showed that the curves of C9-2 presented typical unimodal shapes. Along the LTWF process, the radius of the mainstream pores accounting for the highest proportion remained unchanged, while the peak proportion increased. Figure 5(b) gives the differences between adjacent curves in Figure 5(a). Specifically, the pore could be divided into three levels, i.e., small pores (SPs, ≤0.04 μm), medium pores (MPs, 0.04 μm~0.5 μm), and large pores (LPs, ≥0.5 μm). Accordingly, different levels of pores presented different changing features. The SPs decreased significantly at the early stage (0 PV~200 PV), but the decrement became smaller as the LTWF proceeded. A similar decreasing phenomenon occurred for the MPs except for some increases at the two ends of MPs. For the LPs, there was an obvious increase in the whole LTWF process, where the largest increment occurred around the mainstream pore. The increment of LPs was larger than the decrements of SPs and MPs, and with respect to the stage, the increment was largest at the middle stage (200 PV~400 PV), then early stage and late stage (400 PV~600 PV).Figure 5
(a) Curves of pore-size distribution of C9-2 at four LTWF stages and (b) differences between adjacent distribution curves.
(a)(b)Figure6(a) illustrates the curves of the pore-size distribution of C11-2 at four stages. The curves of C11-2 presented typical bimodal shapes, where the larger mainstream pores accounted for a higher proportion than the smaller one. Along the LTWF process, the curve shifted to the right, and the radius of mainstream pores increased. Besides, the proportion of smaller mainstream pores decreased, while that of the larger mainstream pores was almost unchanged. Figure 6(b) gives the differences between adjacent curves in Figure 6(a). It showed that the differences of C11-2 were larger than those of C9-2 in all three pore levels. Besides, the differences between the three pore levels were quite near. The SPs decreased, where the largest decrement occurred around the smaller mainstream pore. The smaller MPs increased and the larger ones decreased. For the LPs, the largest increment occurred around the larger mainstream pore. With respect to stage, similarly with C9-2, the decrement of MPs became smaller with stage, and the increment of LPs was largest at the middle stage.Figure 6
(a) Curves of pore-size distribution of C11-2 at four LTWF stages and (b) differences between adjacent distribution curves.
(a)(b)


### 3.3. Characteristic Parameters of Pores

The HPMIP curves at the initial state and after-LTWF state are plotted in Figure7. It showed that the changes of pore-size distributions in HPMIP curves were consistent with those in NMR T2 spectra. Table 5 gives the characteristic parameters extracted from HPMIP curves. Similar changing phenomena were observed for C9 and C11. The increase in the average pore radius as well as the median pore radius reflected the expansion of the overall flowing channels, further causing the permeability increment. Additionally, the LPs accounted for higher proportions according to the decrease of the relative sorting coefficient. The increases in structural coefficient and tortuosity indicated more tortuous flowing channels. Figure 8 gives the permeability contributions under different pore radii. It showed that the dominated flow channels of both cores were pores with larger radii.Figure 7
Comparison of the HPMIP curves between the initial state and after-LTWF state: (a) C9 and (b) C11.
(a)(b)Table 5
Comparison of characteristic parameters between the initial state and after-LTWF state.
CoresC9-1C9-2Change (%)C11-1C11-2Change (%)TypeUnimodality/Bimodality/StateInitialAfter/InitialAfter/Average pore radius (μm)0.540.59910.930.5320.67526.73Median pore radius (μm)0.2960.34416.220.4020.49222.52Mainstream pore radius (μm)1100.63158.73Proportion of mainstream pore (%)13.60716.54721.6118.9718.337-3.34Structural coefficient11.55314.16422.612.04519.34560.6Tortuosity3.3993.76410.723.4714.39826.73Relative sorting coefficient5.4764.794-12.455.6194.404-21.62Kurtosis0.8820.8961.590.6870.77112.17Figure 8
The plot of permeability contribution versus pore radius.With respect to the comparisons between the two cores, the relative changes showed significant differences. The structural coefficients (C9-11.553, C11-12.045) and tortuosity (C9-3.399, C11-3.471) of the two cores were quite close at the initial state. However, the relative changes of the two parameters for C9 (60.60% and 26.73%) were much larger than those for C11 (22.60% and 10.72%). Moreover, the pore size distribution and permeability contribution of C11 changed more drastically, and its bimodal characteristics became less obvious. In essence, the C9 with unimodality has a more stable pore mechanical structure than C11 with bimodality.


### 3.4. Clays

Table6 gives the matrix minerals and clays obtained by the XRD test. The minerals constituting the rock matrix accounted for 83%~84% of the overall minerals. The majority of the matrix minerals were quartz and plagioclase. After LTWF, the matrix minerals were almost unchanged (relative changes: C9-0.48%, C11-0.36%). The clays accounted for 16%~17% of the overall minerals, the majority of which was chlorite. After LTWF, the content of chlorite increased and the contents of the illite/smectite mixed layer and illite/decreased for both C9 and C11.Table 6
Comparison of matrix minerals and clays between initial state and after-LTWF state.
CoreC9-1C9-2C11-1C11-2TypeUnimodalityBimodalityStateInitialAfterInitialAfterMatrix minerals (%)Quartz36.236.632.532.8K-feldspar5.769.49.6Plagioclase41.140.940.239.8Calcite0.70.60.91.1Total83.784.18383.3Clays (%)Illite/smectite mixed layer2.82.421.8Illite2.31.71.71.5Chlorite11.211.813.313.4Total16.315.91716.7Figure9 shows the SEM images at the initial state and after-LTWF state. It was observed that the chlorite was filled in the pores with a pompom-like shape (see Figure 9(a)) or attached to the pore walls with a liner-like shape (see Figure 9(d)). The chlorite was brittle mechanically and would break under LTWF, further migrated downstream as fines (see Figures 9(e) and 9(f)). The chlorite filled in the pores partitioned the LPs into several MPs or LPs, increasing flow resistance. In addition, such chlorites may hinder the migration of fines and cause their blockage. The chlorites attached to the pore walls caused higher roughness of the pore walls, and therefore, the migratory fines may be trapped and the pore radius decreased (see Figures 9(d) and 9(e)).Figure 9
The SEM images at the initial state and after-LTWF state.The illite formed a bridge in the pores with the strand-like shape or feather-like shape, leading to an increase of tortuosity and the blockage of large migratory fines (see Figure9(f)). Additionally, the illite may form smaller migratory fines after LTWF, which flows downstream with the fluid more smoothly.The illite/smectite mixed layer existed with the honeycomb-like shape (see Figure9(a)). Such clays had more smooth surfaces, and the smaller migratory fines were trapped in small probability. However, the blockage of larger migratory fines would occur.


## 3.1. Permeability and Porosity

During the water flooding experiment, the permeability and porosity of the core can be calculated using the differential pressure and the total signal amplitude of theT2 spectrum, respectively. The results are shown in Table 4.Table 4
Permeability and porosity information.
CoresWater flooding stage (PV)Injection pressure (MPa)Permeability (mD)Total signal amplitudePorosity (%)C9-200.128050.3651407.4810.422000.129510.3471410.1810.444000.129940.3421422.3410.536000.130030.3411426.3910.56C11-200.127360.3781528.8510.842000.131150.3321531.6710.864000.133250.3111537.3110.906000.133470.3091540.1310.92Herein, two indices were used to evaluate the variations of permeability and porosity during the LTWF process:(3)Ik=k−kiki×100%,Iφ=φ−φiφi,where Ik denotes the permeability index, Iφ denoted the porosity index, ki was the initial permeability, and φi was the initial porosity. The indices at four LTWF stages are plotted in Figure 3.Figure 3
Permeability index and porosity index during the LTWF.According to Figure3, the negative/positive index was observed for the permeability/porosity of both cores, indicating the decrease of permeability and the increase of porosity during the LTWF. Such phenomena were tallied with conventional wisdom from previous studies. The permeability dropped significantly before 400 PV but slightly in 400 PV~600 PV. As for the porosity, the most increment occurred in 200 PV~600 PV. For another, C9-2 showed higher responses to LTWF than C11-2 in terms of permeability, but lower responses in terms of porosity. Specifically, the relative permeability loss of C9-2 and C11-2 at the end of the LTWF was 6.57% and 18.3%, respectively. For the porosity, the maximum relative increment was 1.34% and 0.74%, respectively.


## 3.2. Pore-Size Distribution

The changes of pore size distribution were evaluated by theT2 spectrum in the formal experiment. As stated in Section 2.3.1, the linear scaling coefficient C was calculated by fitting the cumulative frequency curves. The curves are plotted in Figure 4, which showed good agreement between the T2 and real cumulative frequency curves for both cores. The least squares regression method was adopted, where the C of C9 and C of C11 were 70.12 and 61.17, respectively.Figure 4
The fitting of cumulative frequency curves.Figure5(a) illustrates the curves of the pore-size distribution of C9-2 at four sequential LTWF stages. It showed that the curves of C9-2 presented typical unimodal shapes. Along the LTWF process, the radius of the mainstream pores accounting for the highest proportion remained unchanged, while the peak proportion increased. Figure 5(b) gives the differences between adjacent curves in Figure 5(a). Specifically, the pore could be divided into three levels, i.e., small pores (SPs, ≤0.04 μm), medium pores (MPs, 0.04 μm~0.5 μm), and large pores (LPs, ≥0.5 μm). Accordingly, different levels of pores presented different changing features. The SPs decreased significantly at the early stage (0 PV~200 PV), but the decrement became smaller as the LTWF proceeded. A similar decreasing phenomenon occurred for the MPs except for some increases at the two ends of MPs. For the LPs, there was an obvious increase in the whole LTWF process, where the largest increment occurred around the mainstream pore. The increment of LPs was larger than the decrements of SPs and MPs, and with respect to the stage, the increment was largest at the middle stage (200 PV~400 PV), then early stage and late stage (400 PV~600 PV).Figure 5
(a) Curves of pore-size distribution of C9-2 at four LTWF stages and (b) differences between adjacent distribution curves.
(a)(b)Figure6(a) illustrates the curves of the pore-size distribution of C11-2 at four stages. The curves of C11-2 presented typical bimodal shapes, where the larger mainstream pores accounted for a higher proportion than the smaller one. Along the LTWF process, the curve shifted to the right, and the radius of mainstream pores increased. Besides, the proportion of smaller mainstream pores decreased, while that of the larger mainstream pores was almost unchanged. Figure 6(b) gives the differences between adjacent curves in Figure 6(a). It showed that the differences of C11-2 were larger than those of C9-2 in all three pore levels. Besides, the differences between the three pore levels were quite near. The SPs decreased, where the largest decrement occurred around the smaller mainstream pore. The smaller MPs increased and the larger ones decreased. For the LPs, the largest increment occurred around the larger mainstream pore. With respect to stage, similarly with C9-2, the decrement of MPs became smaller with stage, and the increment of LPs was largest at the middle stage.Figure 6
(a) Curves of pore-size distribution of C11-2 at four LTWF stages and (b) differences between adjacent distribution curves.
(a)(b)


## 3.3. Characteristic Parameters of Pores

The HPMIP curves at the initial state and after-LTWF state are plotted in Figure7. It showed that the changes of pore-size distributions in HPMIP curves were consistent with those in NMR T2 spectra. Table 5 gives the characteristic parameters extracted from HPMIP curves. Similar changing phenomena were observed for C9 and C11. The increase in the average pore radius as well as the median pore radius reflected the expansion of the overall flowing channels, further causing the permeability increment. Additionally, the LPs accounted for higher proportions according to the decrease of the relative sorting coefficient. The increases in structural coefficient and tortuosity indicated more tortuous flowing channels. Figure 8 gives the permeability contributions under different pore radii. It showed that the dominated flow channels of both cores were pores with larger radii.Figure 7
Comparison of the HPMIP curves between the initial state and after-LTWF state: (a) C9 and (b) C11.
(a)(b)Table 5
Comparison of characteristic parameters between the initial state and after-LTWF state.
CoresC9-1C9-2Change (%)C11-1C11-2Change (%)TypeUnimodality/Bimodality/StateInitialAfter/InitialAfter/Average pore radius (μm)0.540.59910.930.5320.67526.73Median pore radius (μm)0.2960.34416.220.4020.49222.52Mainstream pore radius (μm)1100.63158.73Proportion of mainstream pore (%)13.60716.54721.6118.9718.337-3.34Structural coefficient11.55314.16422.612.04519.34560.6Tortuosity3.3993.76410.723.4714.39826.73Relative sorting coefficient5.4764.794-12.455.6194.404-21.62Kurtosis0.8820.8961.590.6870.77112.17Figure 8
The plot of permeability contribution versus pore radius.With respect to the comparisons between the two cores, the relative changes showed significant differences. The structural coefficients (C9-11.553, C11-12.045) and tortuosity (C9-3.399, C11-3.471) of the two cores were quite close at the initial state. However, the relative changes of the two parameters for C9 (60.60% and 26.73%) were much larger than those for C11 (22.60% and 10.72%). Moreover, the pore size distribution and permeability contribution of C11 changed more drastically, and its bimodal characteristics became less obvious. In essence, the C9 with unimodality has a more stable pore mechanical structure than C11 with bimodality.


## 3.4. Clays

Table6 gives the matrix minerals and clays obtained by the XRD test. The minerals constituting the rock matrix accounted for 83%~84% of the overall minerals. The majority of the matrix minerals were quartz and plagioclase. After LTWF, the matrix minerals were almost unchanged (relative changes: C9-0.48%, C11-0.36%). The clays accounted for 16%~17% of the overall minerals, the majority of which was chlorite. After LTWF, the content of chlorite increased and the contents of the illite/smectite mixed layer and illite/decreased for both C9 and C11.Table 6
Comparison of matrix minerals and clays between initial state and after-LTWF state.
CoreC9-1C9-2C11-1C11-2TypeUnimodalityBimodalityStateInitialAfterInitialAfterMatrix minerals (%)Quartz36.236.632.532.8K-feldspar5.769.49.6Plagioclase41.140.940.239.8Calcite0.70.60.91.1Total83.784.18383.3Clays (%)Illite/smectite mixed layer2.82.421.8Illite2.31.71.71.5Chlorite11.211.813.313.4Total16.315.91716.7Figure9 shows the SEM images at the initial state and after-LTWF state. It was observed that the chlorite was filled in the pores with a pompom-like shape (see Figure 9(a)) or attached to the pore walls with a liner-like shape (see Figure 9(d)). The chlorite was brittle mechanically and would break under LTWF, further migrated downstream as fines (see Figures 9(e) and 9(f)). The chlorite filled in the pores partitioned the LPs into several MPs or LPs, increasing flow resistance. In addition, such chlorites may hinder the migration of fines and cause their blockage. The chlorites attached to the pore walls caused higher roughness of the pore walls, and therefore, the migratory fines may be trapped and the pore radius decreased (see Figures 9(d) and 9(e)).Figure 9
The SEM images at the initial state and after-LTWF state.The illite formed a bridge in the pores with the strand-like shape or feather-like shape, leading to an increase of tortuosity and the blockage of large migratory fines (see Figure9(f)). Additionally, the illite may form smaller migratory fines after LTWF, which flows downstream with the fluid more smoothly.The illite/smectite mixed layer existed with the honeycomb-like shape (see Figure9(a)). Such clays had more smooth surfaces, and the smaller migratory fines were trapped in small probability. However, the blockage of larger migratory fines would occur.


## 4. Discussion

### 4.1. Mechanism of Property Changes in LTWF

According to the experimental results of both cores, microscopically, the clays changed physically during the LTWF, which further resulted in the changes of pore structure. Consequently, macroscopic property changes occurred, i.e., permeability, porosity, pore size distribution, and characteristic parameters. The clays can induce changes in pore structure in two possible ways: swelling and migration. The two cores in this paper were essentially free of swelling clay (Table6), and the simulated water had the same salinity as connate water. Therefore, the changes in pore structures were induced by clay migration in this paper. As the properties changed differently at the three LTWF stages, the physical processes at the three stages were interpreted as follows.At the initial stage, the pores were connected by throats of different sizes, forming multiple microscopic channels with different flow capacities (see Figure10(a)). At the early stage, the clay released from the pores as the water flushed through the channels continuously, and consequently, the movable particles formed. The phenomenon of significant changes of pore size distribution indicated that the released particles have redistributed. Specifically, the blockage occurred in SPs due to the small spatial channels and weak flow capacity, which resulted in the reduction of SPs (see Figure 10(b)). For MPs and LPs, the released particles migrated downstream. The pores where the particles released became larger, while the pores where the particles accumulated became smaller (see Figure 10(b)). Additionally, the effluxes of particles were rare at this stage according to small changes of porosity.Figure 10
Illustration of the pore structure at different stages: (a) initial state, (b) early stage, (c) middle stage, and (d) late stage.
(a)(b)(c)(d)At the middle stage, the decrements of SPs and permeability became smaller, which indicated that the blockage induced by the released particles weakened. Besides, the changes of permeability contribution showed that some flow channels formed by MPs and LPs became dominant flow channels gradually (see Figure10(c)). The dominant flow channels accepted more fluid flows, and therefore, the flushes in such channels were severer. Additionally, the effluxes of particles occurred at this stage according to a significant increase of porosity.At the late stage, the phenomenon of unchanged SPs and permeability revealed that the stable flow channels have formed (see Figure10(d)). However, some changes still existed, i.e., decreasing MPs, increasing LPs, and slightly increasing porosity. Such changes showed that the processes of migration and efflux still existed but to a small extent.


### 4.2. Difference between Unimodal Core and Bimodal Core

The comparison of experimental results between the unimodal core (C9) and bimodal core (C11) showed that the property changes of the bimodal core were more obvious than those of the unimodal core. Specifically, the blockages in MPs of the bimodal core were severer, resulting in a larger decrease of MPs, a larger increase of tortuosity, and a larger decrease of permeability. For another, the more significant changes of MPs and LPs and the shifts of curve peaks demonstrated that the migration and accumulation of particles were severer. Such phenomena of the bimodal core induce larger changes of permeability contribution. In general, the pore structures as well as the macroscopic properties of the bimodal core were more unstable, which led to a higher response to the LTWF.The different responses of the two types of cores could be essentially attributed to the content differences of clay between the two cores. After LTWF, the contents of the illite and illite/smectite mixed layer increased, while the contents of chlorite increased. Such changes resulted from the microscopic morphologies of the three clays. According to SEM images, the illite and illite/smectite mixed layers were more easily to release and to form tiny movable particles which migrated downstream and outflow. The chlorite with a scaly shape was less likely to migrate to faraway places. The changes of pore structure were dominated by chlorite due to its highest proportion. The bimodal core had more chlorite than the unimodal core at the initial state. Therefore, the more significant changes of pore structure, pore size distribution, and permeability occurred in the bimodal core because of the migration and accumulation caused by chlorite. In contrast, the main physical processes of the unimodal core were the blockage by tiny particles and efflux, and therefore, the unimodal core showed a lower response to the water flush.


## 4.1. Mechanism of Property Changes in LTWF

According to the experimental results of both cores, microscopically, the clays changed physically during the LTWF, which further resulted in the changes of pore structure. Consequently, macroscopic property changes occurred, i.e., permeability, porosity, pore size distribution, and characteristic parameters. The clays can induce changes in pore structure in two possible ways: swelling and migration. The two cores in this paper were essentially free of swelling clay (Table6), and the simulated water had the same salinity as connate water. Therefore, the changes in pore structures were induced by clay migration in this paper. As the properties changed differently at the three LTWF stages, the physical processes at the three stages were interpreted as follows.At the initial stage, the pores were connected by throats of different sizes, forming multiple microscopic channels with different flow capacities (see Figure10(a)). At the early stage, the clay released from the pores as the water flushed through the channels continuously, and consequently, the movable particles formed. The phenomenon of significant changes of pore size distribution indicated that the released particles have redistributed. Specifically, the blockage occurred in SPs due to the small spatial channels and weak flow capacity, which resulted in the reduction of SPs (see Figure 10(b)). For MPs and LPs, the released particles migrated downstream. The pores where the particles released became larger, while the pores where the particles accumulated became smaller (see Figure 10(b)). Additionally, the effluxes of particles were rare at this stage according to small changes of porosity.Figure 10
Illustration of the pore structure at different stages: (a) initial state, (b) early stage, (c) middle stage, and (d) late stage.
(a)(b)(c)(d)At the middle stage, the decrements of SPs and permeability became smaller, which indicated that the blockage induced by the released particles weakened. Besides, the changes of permeability contribution showed that some flow channels formed by MPs and LPs became dominant flow channels gradually (see Figure10(c)). The dominant flow channels accepted more fluid flows, and therefore, the flushes in such channels were severer. Additionally, the effluxes of particles occurred at this stage according to a significant increase of porosity.At the late stage, the phenomenon of unchanged SPs and permeability revealed that the stable flow channels have formed (see Figure10(d)). However, some changes still existed, i.e., decreasing MPs, increasing LPs, and slightly increasing porosity. Such changes showed that the processes of migration and efflux still existed but to a small extent.


## 4.2. Difference between Unimodal Core and Bimodal Core

The comparison of experimental results between the unimodal core (C9) and bimodal core (C11) showed that the property changes of the bimodal core were more obvious than those of the unimodal core. Specifically, the blockages in MPs of the bimodal core were severer, resulting in a larger decrease of MPs, a larger increase of tortuosity, and a larger decrease of permeability. For another, the more significant changes of MPs and LPs and the shifts of curve peaks demonstrated that the migration and accumulation of particles were severer. Such phenomena of the bimodal core induce larger changes of permeability contribution. In general, the pore structures as well as the macroscopic properties of the bimodal core were more unstable, which led to a higher response to the LTWF.The different responses of the two types of cores could be essentially attributed to the content differences of clay between the two cores. After LTWF, the contents of the illite and illite/smectite mixed layer increased, while the contents of chlorite increased. Such changes resulted from the microscopic morphologies of the three clays. According to SEM images, the illite and illite/smectite mixed layers were more easily to release and to form tiny movable particles which migrated downstream and outflow. The chlorite with a scaly shape was less likely to migrate to faraway places. The changes of pore structure were dominated by chlorite due to its highest proportion. The bimodal core had more chlorite than the unimodal core at the initial state. Therefore, the more significant changes of pore structure, pore size distribution, and permeability occurred in the bimodal core because of the migration and accumulation caused by chlorite. In contrast, the main physical processes of the unimodal core were the blockage by tiny particles and efflux, and therefore, the unimodal core showed a lower response to the water flush.


## 5. Conclusions

This paper provided comprehensive insights into the LTWF by performing standard core flow experiments in conjunction with a couple of tests consisting of online NMR, HPMP, XRD, and SEM. Both the unimodal core and bimodal core were involved in the study. The main contributions were outlined as follows.LTWF caused a decrease of permeability and the increase of porosity. The unimodal core showed higher responses to LTWF than the bimodal core in terms of permeability, but lower responses in terms of porosity.(1)
As the LTWF proceeded, the SPs decreased and the LPs increased for both cores. For the unimodal core, the radius of the mainstream pores remained unchanged, while the peak proportion increased. For the unimodal core, the pore-size distribution curve shifted to the right, and the radius of mainstream pores increased. The proportion of smaller mainstream pores decreased, while that of the larger mainstream pores was almost unchanged(2)
After LTWF, the average pore radius, median pore radius, structural coefficient, and tortuosity increased, while the relative sorting coefficient decreased. The relative changes of the parameters for the unimodal core were much smaller than those for the bimodal core(3)
The clays in both cores consisted of chlorite, illite/smectite mixed layer, and illite, the majority of which was chlorite. After LTWF, the content of chlorite increased and the contents of the illite/smectite mixed layer and illite decreased(4)
During the process of LTWF, fines such as chlorite, illite/smectite mixed layer, and illite detached from the pore surface and transported in pore throats. When the fines get stuck in SPs, core structure coefficient and tortuosity will increase, which accordingly reduce the flow capacity of connected pores. The change of MPs and LPs structure is mainly caused by detachment and loss of chlorite, which makes the average and median pore radius bigger(5)
The changes of pore structure and macroscopic properties were induced by the clays. At the early stage, the blockage of the released clays occurred in SPs. Some of the MPs and LPs became larger due to the release and some of them became smaller due to the accumulation. At the middle stage, the blockage of SPs weakened. Some flow channels formed by MPs and LPs became dominant flow channels gradually. The effluxes of particles occurred, resulting in a significant increase in porosity. At the late stage, the stable flow channels have formed. Some changes still existed due to migration and efflux but to a small extent(6)
The higher response of the bimodal core to LTWF could be attributed to its higher content of chlorite. The chlorite with a scaly shape was less likely to migrate to faraway places, and therefore, the released chlorite accumulated, which caused significant changes of pore structure



---

*Source: 6671597-2021-02-02.xml*