# A Compact Quasi-Yagi Antenna with High Gain by Employing the Bent Arms and Split-Ring Resonators

Authors: Wen-Ying Zhou; Zhong-Lei Mei; Mai Lu
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

A compact quasi-Yagi antenna with bent arms and split-ring resonators (SRRs) is proposed. Compared with traditional quasi-Yagi antennas employing straight arms, the resonant frequency of the proposed antenna could be always consistent with its center frequency, and there is no obvious frequency shift under the process of its miniaturization. The SRRs are adopted in the proposed compact antenna for a high gain of 6.58 dBi. The reliability verification of the proposed antenna radiation characteristics is further experimentally proved with the prototype measurement. The proposed quasi-Yagi antenna has an adjustable compact structure and low frequency offset and could be used in the precise point-to-point wireless communication environment.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

As a classic directive antenna, Yagi-Uda has been widely used in many fields, such as RFID, WLAN, MIMO system, wireless energy harvesting, and IOT [1–5]. A traditional quasi-Yagi antenna consists of a dipole as a driven element, a reflector to cancel the back radiation, and one or more directors as parasitic elements to realize the end-fire radiation. The characteristics of the traditional quasi-Yagi antenna are decided by the proper amplitude and phase condition between its constituent elements. Therefore, a traditional quasi-Yagi antenna always has a large physical dimension for achieving a high gain at the S-band. For expanding the bandwidth and improving the gain of the Yagi antenna, different feed networks, baluns, exciters, and director structures design have been proposed [6–9].As the electromagnetic environment becomes more complex, a miniaturized Yagi-Uda antenna is required to reduce electromagnetic interference and increase the flexibility of mobile terminals. However, in the process of Yagi-Uda antenna miniaturization, the gain would decrease and the resonant frequency would deviate as well. Different compact Yagi antennas have been designed for different applications. In 2015 and 2017, a miniaturized quasi-Yagi antenna with fold dipole [10] and a compact printed Yagi-Uda with a hairpin-shaped meandered driven element [11] were proposed for RFID. In 2018, a rectangular loop element was designed to realize the miniaturization of the quasi-Yagi antenna for constructing a multiwideband MIMO system [12]. In 2019, different filter elements were designed for obtaining the compact size of quasi-Yagi antennas in the S-band and C-band [13, 14]. In 2020, a compact quasi-Yagi antenna based on double monopole feed was proposed for broadband application [15], and a compact planar Moxon-Yagi composite antenna was designed for dual-band application [16].Unlike the existing arc-shaped hairpin line [17] for gain enhancement and arrow-shaped line for broadening bandwidth [18], in this article, a compact quasi-Yagi antenna with bent-shaped arms of drivers and directors has been proposed, and there is no obvious frequency shift under the process of its miniaturization. Besides, the SRRs were adopted to obtain a high gain of the proposed antenna, and the specific influences of the bent arms and SRRs were further discussed in different compact structures of the proposed antenna. The final experimental results were satisfactory with simulation results. The flexibly adjustable characteristic of the proposed antenna, together with its low frequency deviation, is suitable to realize precise point-to-point communication in various fields, such as rail transit communication, WLAN, and industrial scientific and medical (ISM) in the frequency range of 2.4∼ 2.48 GHz. If the frequency deviation range of an antenna exceeds 80 MHz in abovementioned application fields, it will cause unpredictable electromagnetic compatibility problems in the whole communication system.


## 2. Quasi-Yagi Antenna Design and Analysis

### 2.1. Quasi-Yagi Antenna Design

By using the straight arms as the drivers and directors, a traditional quasi-Yagi is designed as a reference antenna, with the center frequency of 2.45 GHz, as shown in Figure1. A dipole antenna is adopted as a driven element, and its two arms are printed on both sides of a dielectric substrate, respectively. An FR4 substrate slab is used, with a relative permittivity of 4.4, thickness of 0.8 mm, and dielectric loss tangent of 0.02, which is used in all the antennas’ design in this paper.Figure 1
Layout and design parameters of the reference quasi-Yagi antenna with straight arms.According to the length and width of the straight exciter and director's arm, a novel bent-arm antenna is proposed. An initial miniaturized quasi-Yagi based on the bent arm is shown in Figure2. As the electric currents formed on bent arms are more suitable for wave propagation and radiation, the same radiation performance could be obtained when reducing the length of a quasi-Yagi antenna of size (h) from 90 mm to 75 mm.Figure 2
Layout and design parameters of the quasi-Yagi antenna with bent arms.


### 2.2. Characteristics Analysis

#### 2.2.1. Comparison of Radiation Performance

The reflection coefficients (S11) of quasi-Yagi antennas with straight and bent arms are simulated, respectively, by simulation software CST, and the comparison results are shown in Figure 3.Figure 3
Comparison of the reflection coefficients.Figure3 shows that both two antennas have good impedance matching at the same resonant frequency of 2.45 GHz and obtain a bandwidth of 400 MHz.Figure4 shows that the end-fire radiation of both antennas is along the y-axis, and the gain of the quasi-Yagi antenna with bent arms is 6.13 dBi, which is slightly higher than that of the quasi-Yagi antenna with straight arms. Besides, there is a 17% reduction of the dielectric substrate length.Figure 4
Comparison of the 3D radiation patterns. (a) Straight arms. (b) Bent arms.
(a)(b)


#### 2.2.2. Comparison of Resonant Frequency Shift

By reducing the distance (L3) between directors and drivers and the distance (L2) between directors, the physical dimensions of the proposed quasi-Yagi antenna can be reduced correspondingly, when L2 varies from 3 mm to 16 mm and L3 varies from 2 mm to 8 mm. The S11 curves of the abovementioned quasi-Yagi antennas are compared and shown in Figure 5.Figure 5
Variation ofS11 versus resonant frequency of different parameters. (a) Straight arms. (b) Bent arms.
(a)(b)As clearly demonstrated in Figure5, the frequency offset of the quasi-Yagi antenna with straight arms is more than 60 MHz under the abovementioned parameter variation, but the frequency offset of the quasi-Yagi antenna with bent arms is less than 20 MHz. It reveals that the resonant frequency is hardly affected by structure modification of the quasi-Yagi antenna with bent arms, which is more stable than the antenna with straight arms. Moreover, the comparison results indicate the quasi-Yagi with bent arms could be further miniaturized with lower loss.


## 2.1. Quasi-Yagi Antenna Design

By using the straight arms as the drivers and directors, a traditional quasi-Yagi is designed as a reference antenna, with the center frequency of 2.45 GHz, as shown in Figure1. A dipole antenna is adopted as a driven element, and its two arms are printed on both sides of a dielectric substrate, respectively. An FR4 substrate slab is used, with a relative permittivity of 4.4, thickness of 0.8 mm, and dielectric loss tangent of 0.02, which is used in all the antennas’ design in this paper.Figure 1
Layout and design parameters of the reference quasi-Yagi antenna with straight arms.According to the length and width of the straight exciter and director's arm, a novel bent-arm antenna is proposed. An initial miniaturized quasi-Yagi based on the bent arm is shown in Figure2. As the electric currents formed on bent arms are more suitable for wave propagation and radiation, the same radiation performance could be obtained when reducing the length of a quasi-Yagi antenna of size (h) from 90 mm to 75 mm.Figure 2
Layout and design parameters of the quasi-Yagi antenna with bent arms.


## 2.2. Characteristics Analysis

### 2.2.1. Comparison of Radiation Performance

The reflection coefficients (S11) of quasi-Yagi antennas with straight and bent arms are simulated, respectively, by simulation software CST, and the comparison results are shown in Figure 3.Figure 3
Comparison of the reflection coefficients.Figure3 shows that both two antennas have good impedance matching at the same resonant frequency of 2.45 GHz and obtain a bandwidth of 400 MHz.Figure4 shows that the end-fire radiation of both antennas is along the y-axis, and the gain of the quasi-Yagi antenna with bent arms is 6.13 dBi, which is slightly higher than that of the quasi-Yagi antenna with straight arms. Besides, there is a 17% reduction of the dielectric substrate length.Figure 4
Comparison of the 3D radiation patterns. (a) Straight arms. (b) Bent arms.
(a)(b)


### 2.2.2. Comparison of Resonant Frequency Shift

By reducing the distance (L3) between directors and drivers and the distance (L2) between directors, the physical dimensions of the proposed quasi-Yagi antenna can be reduced correspondingly, when L2 varies from 3 mm to 16 mm and L3 varies from 2 mm to 8 mm. The S11 curves of the abovementioned quasi-Yagi antennas are compared and shown in Figure 5.Figure 5
Variation ofS11 versus resonant frequency of different parameters. (a) Straight arms. (b) Bent arms.
(a)(b)As clearly demonstrated in Figure5, the frequency offset of the quasi-Yagi antenna with straight arms is more than 60 MHz under the abovementioned parameter variation, but the frequency offset of the quasi-Yagi antenna with bent arms is less than 20 MHz. It reveals that the resonant frequency is hardly affected by structure modification of the quasi-Yagi antenna with bent arms, which is more stable than the antenna with straight arms. Moreover, the comparison results indicate the quasi-Yagi with bent arms could be further miniaturized with lower loss.


## 2.2.1. Comparison of Radiation Performance

The reflection coefficients (S11) of quasi-Yagi antennas with straight and bent arms are simulated, respectively, by simulation software CST, and the comparison results are shown in Figure 3.Figure 3
Comparison of the reflection coefficients.Figure3 shows that both two antennas have good impedance matching at the same resonant frequency of 2.45 GHz and obtain a bandwidth of 400 MHz.Figure4 shows that the end-fire radiation of both antennas is along the y-axis, and the gain of the quasi-Yagi antenna with bent arms is 6.13 dBi, which is slightly higher than that of the quasi-Yagi antenna with straight arms. Besides, there is a 17% reduction of the dielectric substrate length.Figure 4
Comparison of the 3D radiation patterns. (a) Straight arms. (b) Bent arms.
(a)(b)


## 2.2.2. Comparison of Resonant Frequency Shift

By reducing the distance (L3) between directors and drivers and the distance (L2) between directors, the physical dimensions of the proposed quasi-Yagi antenna can be reduced correspondingly, when L2 varies from 3 mm to 16 mm and L3 varies from 2 mm to 8 mm. The S11 curves of the abovementioned quasi-Yagi antennas are compared and shown in Figure 5.Figure 5
Variation ofS11 versus resonant frequency of different parameters. (a) Straight arms. (b) Bent arms.
(a)(b)As clearly demonstrated in Figure5, the frequency offset of the quasi-Yagi antenna with straight arms is more than 60 MHz under the abovementioned parameter variation, but the frequency offset of the quasi-Yagi antenna with bent arms is less than 20 MHz. It reveals that the resonant frequency is hardly affected by structure modification of the quasi-Yagi antenna with bent arms, which is more stable than the antenna with straight arms. Moreover, the comparison results indicate the quasi-Yagi with bent arms could be further miniaturized with lower loss.


## 3. A Compact Quasi-Yagi Antenna with SRRs

If the size of the initial model of quasi-Yagi antenna with bent arms is further reduced, its gain would also be reduced. To overcome this problem, metamaterials were introduced into the design of Yagi-Uda antennas [19–22]. In [23], we have used SRRs to reduce coupling between antenna elements. In this article, the SRRs array is used as additional parasitic elements, which can generate the induced currents of the proposed antenna and compensate the gain reduction in its miniaturization process. Based on the simulated results in section 2, a compact rectangle quasi-Yagi antenna with SRRs is proposed firstly, as shown in Figure 6(a). A compact trapezoid quasi-Yagi antenna is then designed to further reduce the antenna size, as shown in Figure 6(b).Figure 6
Layout and design parameters of the proposed compact quasi-Yagi antennas with bent arms. (a) Compact rectangle quasi-Yagi antenna. (b) Compact trapezoid quasi-Yagi antenna.
(a)(b)The reflection coefficients of the two shapes of compact quasi-Yagi antennas are simulated. As Figure7 shows both compact quasi-Yagi antennas resonate at 2.45 GHz with a good impedance matching level.Figure 7
Reflection coefficients of the compact quasi-Yagi antennas.The gains of the compact rectangle antenna and trapezoid antenna at the operation frequency of 2.45 GHz were also calculated, and the results are shown in Figure8.Figure 8
3D radiation patterns of the compact quasi-Yagi antennas. (a) Rectangle shape. (b) Trapezoid shape.
(a)(b)As seen in Figure8, the compact rectangle quasi-Yagi antenna exhibits a maximum gain of 6.58 dBi, and that of the compact trapezoid quasi-Yagi antenna is 6.54 dBi. The simulated results indicate that the shorter bent arms of directors and more SRRs would not change the resonant frequency either.The simulated surface current distributions of the proposed antenna are shown in Figure9. Since the magnetic field of the proposed quasi-Yagi antenna passes through the SRR loop perpendicularly, the SRRs, which can be treated as an additional parasitic element, will resonate at 2.45 GHz and generate in phase current distribution in the loops. As a result, it can further enhance the end-fire radiation performance due to the constructive interference in this direction. Therefore, the gain of the proposed quasi-Yagi antenna is improved without affecting the antenna size and bandwidth.Figure 9
Simulated surface current distribution of the compact quasi-Yagi antennas. (a) Rectangle shape. (b) Trapezoid shape.
(a)(b)


## 4. Quasi-Yagi Antennas Fabrication and Their Measurement Results

The prototype of the reference quasi-Yagi antenna and the proposed quasi-Yagi antennas is fabricated, as shown in Figure10. The fabricated dielectric substrate has the same relative permittivity and thickness as the simulation model. The reference antenna is shown in Figure 10(a), and the proposed compact quasi-Yagi antennas with rectangle and trapezoid shape are observed in Figures 10(b) and 10(c).Figure 10
Fabricated quasi-Yagi antennas. (a) Reference quasi-Yagi antenna with straight arms (90 mm). (b) Compact rectangle quasi-Yagi antenna with bent arms (65 mm). (c) Compact trapezoid quasi-Yagi antenna with bent arms (30 mm).
(a)(b)(c)The fabricated antennas were measured by using the Agilent Technologies E5071C vector network analyzer. The comparison ofS11 between the measured and simulation results are shown in Figure 11.Figure 11
S11 comparison of the fabricated quasi-Yagi antennas. (a) Reference quasi-Yagi antenna with straight arms (90 mm). (b) Compact rectangle quasi-Yagi antenna with bent arms (65 mm). (c) Compact trapezoid quasi-Yagi antenna with bent arms (30 mm).
(a)(b)(c)As can be seen clearly in Figure11, the simulated and measured results of the reflection coefficients are in a good agreement. The measured results indicate the resonant frequency of three antennas is 2.45 GHz with reflection coefficients better than −18 dB. It also reveals the ideal response of the reflection coefficients obtained by adding the SRRs.Figure12 shows the comparisons of simulated and measured radiation patterns in the E and the H plane at 2.45 GHz.Figure 12
Simulated and measured radiation patterns of the designed quasi- Yagi antenna. (a) Reference quasi-Yagi antenna (90 mm). (b) Compact rectangle quasi-Yagi antenna (65 mm). (c) Compact trapezoid quasi-Yagi antenna (30 mm).
(a)(b)(c)As can be seen clearly in Figure12, the agreement between the simulated and measured patterns is satisfactory. The small difference in the back lobe radiation between simulated and measured results is mainly due to the fabricated accuracy and measurement error. Generally speaking, the performance of the main lobe suggests that the proposed quasi-Yagi antenna has good end-fire performance at the operation frequency.Detailed bandwidth description versus operating frequency of the proposed antennas and their corresponding radiation efficiency at 2.45 GHz are displayed in Table1.Table 1
Detailed comparison of the presented antennas.
Bandwidth/(band) (GHz)Radiation efficiencyReference0.34 (2.3∼2.68)0.95418Rectangle shape0.35 (2.285∼2.635)0.95504Trapezoid shape0.3 (2.275∼2.575)0.95598As can be seen in Table1, the 10 dB return loss bandwidth of the presented antennas are more than 0.3 GHz, and the radiation efficiency are more than 0.95 at 2.45 GHz. The compact rectangle antenna has the best performance.To compare the gain enhancement of 3 presented antennas, the 2D gain versus frequency plot for simulation results is given, as shown in Figure13. It can be seen that the gain of the compact antennas with SRRs is higher than that of the antenna without SRRs at their corresponding operating frequency band.Figure 13
Simulated results of 2D gain versus frequency comparison of the presented antennas.We also compare the performance of the proposed quasi-Yagi antenna with other compact Yagi works, and detailed descriptions are shown in Table2. As shown in Table 2, the proposed antenna has the simple structure, relatively compact size, and high gain. The design complexity refers to the flexibility of parameters adjustment in the realization of Yagi antenna miniaturization.Table 2
Comparison of the proposed quasi-Yagi antenna with other quasi-Yagi works.
References[10][11][12][13][14][15][16]ProposedFrequency (GHz)0.90.9222.44.52.252.452.45Size (mm2)90 × 9080 × 45.555 × 6070 × 4955 × 3597 × 86104 × 72.565 × 60Gain (dBi)5.34.55.365.74.65.36.56.58Design complexityComplexComplexComplexEasyEasyEasyComplexEasy


## 5. Conclusions

In this work, a compact quasi-Yagi antenna by embedding bent arms and SRRs is proposed. The stability of resonant frequency is examined using four variable values,L1∗, L2, L3, and numbers of SRRs. The antenna always keeps the same resonant frequency of 2.45 GHz basically, which means that the proposed antenna could be flexibly miniaturized in a certain extent. The SRRs are arranged in the front of directors to enhance the end-fire gain to 6.58 dBi. The simulation and experimental results show that the geometrical size of the quasi-Yagi antenna can be reduced by 28% (0.21 λ0), with its gain increase of 8.6% by the proposed design method of combining bent arms with SRRs. The better match in impedance and the lower reflection loss can be obtained at the same time. The proposed compact quasi-Yagi antenna with high gain can be used in point-to-point wireless communication systems and the massive array antennas.



---

*Source: 6666657-2021-02-19.xml*