# Evaluation of Rheological Parameters of Slag-Based Paste Backfill with Superplasticizer

Authors: Zhonghui Zhang; Yuanhui Li; Lei Ren; Zhenbang Guo; Haiqiang Jiang; Na Liu
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

The use of blast furnace slag-based binders in cemented paste backfill (CPB) has become increasingly popular in China, due to its low cost and superior early-age strength. Increasing the solid content can increase the strength of CPB, but it will lead to a decrease in its fluidity. As a chemical admixture that can improve CPB slurry fluidity, superplasticizer is gaining increased interest in the field of CPB. In this study, the effects of superplasticizer types and dosages, curing time, solid content, and binder content on the rheological properties of fresh CPB made of blast furnace slag-based binder (Slag-CPB) were studied. For Slag-CPB samples, polycarboxylate (PC) has the best water-reducing effect, followed by polymelamine sulfonate (PMS) and polynaphthalene sulfonate (PNS). In the absence of a superplasticizer, the shear yield stress and plastic viscosity of Slag-CPB are lower than those of CPB made of ordinary Portland cement (OPC-CPB). The water-reducing effect of PC on OPC-CPBs samples is stronger than that of Slag-CPB samples. The degradation rate of the water-reducing effect in slag-based samples is higher than that in cement-based samples. The effect of PC is affected by solid content and binder content. These results will contribute to a better understanding of the rheological behavior of Slag-CPB with superplasticizer.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Mining activities not only obtain mineral resources, but also produce a lot of solid wastes (e.g., tailings) and underground voids [1–5]. The continuous improvement of national environmental protection requirements has prompted mining enterprises to seek scientific and efficient methods for underground voids and tailings management [6]. One of these emerging techniques is cemented paste backfill (CPB) which offers better technical and economic advantages over other filling methods like rock/slurry fills. The cemented paste backfill (CPB) is a composite material prepared by mixing a certain mass ratio of tailing, binders (e.g., cement, fly ash, or slag), and water [7–12]. It offers a range of advantages including efficient disposal of processing tailings, improved working environment, increased resource recovery, and improved ground controls [13–18].The CPB should reach certain mechanical stability to resist external dynamic and static loads. Increasing the slurry concentration is one of the most effective ways to improve the mechanical stability of CPB and to reduce the filling cost [19]. However, an increase in slurry concentration will inevitably lead to a decrease in its fluidity. When the slurry concentration exceeds a certain critical value, the shear yield stress and dynamic viscosity can increase exponentially with the concentration, which will easily lead to pipe clogging, which can have significant financial ramifications [20]. Therefore, it is of crucial importance to improve the fluidity of CPB slurry as much as possible without reducing the solid content of slurry. As a chemical admixture that can reduce the water consumption while maintaining the slump of slurry basically unchanged, the superplasticizer provides a technical solution for the fluidity problem of high concentration CPB slurry [13, 14].At present, there have been many studies on the effect of the superplasticizer on the fluidity of CPB slurry. For example, Haruna and Fall [21] studied the influence of the superplasticizer on the rheological properties of CPB at different curing temperatures. The results showed that the increase of curing temperature leads to the increase of yield stress and viscosity of fresh CPB slurry incorporating superplasticizer. Panchal et al. [22] evaluated the influence of different superplasticizer contents on the rheological properties of CPB. They indicated that the superplasticizer has an important influence on the rheological properties of CPB, and it can be appropriately used to improve the fluidity of the CPB containing carbonate-rich process tailings. To study the effects of different superplasticizer types on strength and rheological behavior of CPB, Mangane et al. [23] mixed four types of superplasticizers (lignosulfonate, naphthalene, melamine, and polycarboxylate) with CPB slurry containing various binder dosages. They found that polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer showed the best performance; it can reduce the dosage of binder and maintain the strength of CPB at the same time.However, to our knowledge, most of the previous studies focus on CPB made of ordinary Portland cement (OPC-CPB). There are no studies addressing the effects of the superplasticizer on rheological properties of CPB made of blast furnace slag-based binder (Slag-CPB). As is known to all, the water-binding (or consuming) capacity of cement hydration is weak (a water–cement ratio of 0.2–0.25 is adequate for cement hydration), and a typical water–cement ratio for CPB is 3–8. As a result, CPB made of OPC has a slow hardening rate, leading to a low strength (especially early strength). Moreover, the cost accounts for 75% of the total backfill cost with cement as a sole binder for CPB [24]. In recent years, blast furnace slag-based binders have been rapidly promoted and applied in many mines in China due to their high strength and low price. Therefore, the research on the influence of superplasticizer on the fluidity of slag-based CPB slurry is particularly important for the preparation, transportation, and structural optimization design of slag-based filling materials.In view of this, this study aims to evaluate the rheological properties of Slag-CPB containing superplasticizer, with a special emphasis on quantifying the effect of superplasticizer type and dosage, curing time, solid content, and binder content on rheological parameters, principally yield stress, and plastic viscosity.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

#### 2.1.1. Tailings

The tailings used in the tests were unclassified tailings of a gold mine in Shandong province, China. The particle size distribution of tailings was determined by Malvern Laser Mastersizer 2000 and the results are shown in Figure1 and Table 1. The volume proportion of −20 μm particles in the tailings is 42.9%, which can be classified as medium tailings [25]. The coefficient of curvature and coefficient of uniformity are 0.50 and 25.75, respectively. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) results showed that the main chemical components of tailings were SiO2 (62.5%), Al2O3 (16.2%), K2O (8.11%), Na2O (3.07%), and CaO (2.98%), and some trace ingredients were also found. X-ray diffraction (XRD) test results showed that the tailing is mainly composed of quartz, albite, and mica (Figure 2).Figure 1
Particle size distribution curves for tailings, OPC, and slag.Table 1
Main physical and chemical properties of tailings, OPC, and slag.
Chemical composition (wt.%)TailingsOPCSlagPhysical propertiesTailingsOPCSlagCaO2.9862.3440.01Specific gravity2.683.32.90Fe2O31.725.060.38Specific surface (cm2/g)347058086198SiO262.521.4333.80−20μm content (%)42.966.370.1Al2O316.24.2515.71Cu25.753.293.38MgO0.522.616.90Cc0.501.251.10Na2O3.070.410.05Pozzolanic strength index (%)K2O8.110.730.447 daysN/AN/A69.6SO30.451.480.1828 daysN/AN/A90.4Figure 2
XRD pattern of tailings.


#### 2.1.2. Binders

The binder agents used in this study were a commercial OPC (viz., PO 42.5R, used as a reference) and a slag-based binder. The slag-based binder material consists of slag (70%) and compound activator (30%). The main components of the compound activator are a sulphate, a silicate, and an alkali metal salt. The particle size distribution of the slag was determined by Malvern Laser Mastersizer 2000 (Figure1). Fine particles (−20 μm) content in the slag accounted for 70.1%, and the coefficients of curvature and coefficient of uniformity are 1.10 and 3.38, respectively. XRF analysis was used to determine the main chemical components of the slag, and the results showed that the slag mainly contained CaO (40.01 wt.%), SiO2 (33.8 wt.%), Al2O3 (15.71 wt.%), and MgO (6.90 wt.%) and some trace chemical components (Table 1). The XRD analysis of Slag shows a diffuse diffraction pattern typical of an amorphous glassy material, as shown in Figure 3. The basicity coefficient (Kb = (CaO + MgO)/(SiO2 + Al2O3)) of slag is 0.95 and hence can be classified to be acid slag. The slag has an activity coefficient (HM = CaO + MgO + Al2O3)/SiO2) of 1.85.Figure 3
XRD pattern of slag material.


#### 2.1.3. Superplasticizer and Water

Three types of superplasticizers were used in this experiment: a polynaphthalene sulfonate (PNS), a polymelamine sulfonate (PMS), and a polycarboxylate (PC), all in powder form and purchased from BASF (Figure4). Tap water with a pH of 7.5 was used as mixing water to achieve the desired consistency of the slurry [26]. The water mainly contains Ca (45.33 ppm), Na (4.62 ppm), and Mg (2.74 ppm) [27].Figure 4
Three types of superplasticizers used in the test.


### 2.2. Mix Proportions

This experiment is divided into two stages. Stage I: three different types of superplasticizers were tested for water reduction effects under different dosages, and the best type of superplasticizer was selected. Stage II: based on the optimal type of superplasticizer, the effects of curing age, solid content, and binder content on water-reducing effect were studied. The solid content is the ratio of solids (tailing and binder) to total mass. The binder content is the mass ratio between binder and solids. The superplasticizer dosage is the ratio of the mass of the superplasticizer to the total mass of solids. The details of the CPB mixtures are summarized in Table2.Table 2
Mix proportions of fresh CPB.
StageFactorsSuperplasticizer typeBinder typeSuperplasticizer content (‰)Binder content (%)Solid content (%)Curing time (min)ITypes and dosage of superplasticizerPNSSlag-based binder0, 0.36, 0.73, 1.09, 1.45, 1.819.1760PMSSlag-based binder0, 0.36, 0.73, 1.09, 1.45, 1.819.1760PCSlag-based binder0, 0.36, 0.54, 1.099.1760IICuring timePCSlag-based binder, OPC0, 0.36, 0.549.1760PCSlag-based binder, OPC0, 0.36, 0.549.17630PCSlag-based binder, OPC0, 0.36, 0.549.17660PCSlag-based binder, OPC0, 0.36, 0.549.176120Solid contentPCSlag-based binder0, 0.36, 0.549.1760PCSlag-based binder0, 0.36, 0.549.1770PCSlag-based binder0, 0.36, 0.549.1780Binder contentPCSlag-based binder0, 0.36, 0.544.8760PCSlag-based binder0, 0.36, 0.549.1760PCSlag-based binder0, 0.36, 0.5414.3760PCSlag-based binder0, 0.36, 0.5420.0760


### 2.3. Sample Preparation and Rheological Test

The CPB samples with different superplasticizer types and dosages, curing time, solid content, and binder content were prepared using a double spiral mixer. Before mechanical mixing, the preweighed tailings, binder, and superplasticizer were homogenized by hand. Then, the required water was added to the solids, followed by 2 minutes of slow stirring and 2 minutes of fast stirring (see Figures5 and 6).Figure 5
Flow chart of the mixing and rheological measurement sequence.Figure 6
The preparation stages of CPB samples: (a) mixing, (b) curing, and (c) testing.
(a)(b)(c)The Brookfield RSR-SST rheometer with a four-bladed vane (diameter of 20 mm and length of 40 mm) was used for rheological tests. The rotor was first sheared in 60 s with a shear rate of 100 s−1, and then the shear rate was reduced to 0.001 s−1 within 60 s. In this study, the upper and lower boundary of the cross plate, the side boundary distance, and the test container boundary distance are both larger than the size requirements specified in ASTM D4648/D4648M-16. Therefore, the boundary effect can be ignored. Each set of experiments were repeated at least 3 times to ensure the repeatability and accuracy of the results.The Bingham model was used to fit the shear stress-shear rate data of the descending section (100 s−1  ⟶  0.0001 s−1), so as to obtain the rheological parameters (yield shear stress and plastic viscosity) of the slurry. It should be noted that the model fitting correlation coefficients R2 obtained in this experiment were all higher than 0.98:(1)τ=τ0+η⋅γ,where τ is the shear stress (Pa); τ0 is shear yield stress (Pa); η is the plastic viscosity (Pa·s); and γ is the shear rate (s−1).


## 2.1. Materials

### 2.1.1. Tailings

The tailings used in the tests were unclassified tailings of a gold mine in Shandong province, China. The particle size distribution of tailings was determined by Malvern Laser Mastersizer 2000 and the results are shown in Figure1 and Table 1. The volume proportion of −20 μm particles in the tailings is 42.9%, which can be classified as medium tailings [25]. The coefficient of curvature and coefficient of uniformity are 0.50 and 25.75, respectively. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) results showed that the main chemical components of tailings were SiO2 (62.5%), Al2O3 (16.2%), K2O (8.11%), Na2O (3.07%), and CaO (2.98%), and some trace ingredients were also found. X-ray diffraction (XRD) test results showed that the tailing is mainly composed of quartz, albite, and mica (Figure 2).Figure 1
Particle size distribution curves for tailings, OPC, and slag.Table 1
Main physical and chemical properties of tailings, OPC, and slag.
Chemical composition (wt.%)TailingsOPCSlagPhysical propertiesTailingsOPCSlagCaO2.9862.3440.01Specific gravity2.683.32.90Fe2O31.725.060.38Specific surface (cm2/g)347058086198SiO262.521.4333.80−20μm content (%)42.966.370.1Al2O316.24.2515.71Cu25.753.293.38MgO0.522.616.90Cc0.501.251.10Na2O3.070.410.05Pozzolanic strength index (%)K2O8.110.730.447 daysN/AN/A69.6SO30.451.480.1828 daysN/AN/A90.4Figure 2
XRD pattern of tailings.


### 2.1.2. Binders

The binder agents used in this study were a commercial OPC (viz., PO 42.5R, used as a reference) and a slag-based binder. The slag-based binder material consists of slag (70%) and compound activator (30%). The main components of the compound activator are a sulphate, a silicate, and an alkali metal salt. The particle size distribution of the slag was determined by Malvern Laser Mastersizer 2000 (Figure1). Fine particles (−20 μm) content in the slag accounted for 70.1%, and the coefficients of curvature and coefficient of uniformity are 1.10 and 3.38, respectively. XRF analysis was used to determine the main chemical components of the slag, and the results showed that the slag mainly contained CaO (40.01 wt.%), SiO2 (33.8 wt.%), Al2O3 (15.71 wt.%), and MgO (6.90 wt.%) and some trace chemical components (Table 1). The XRD analysis of Slag shows a diffuse diffraction pattern typical of an amorphous glassy material, as shown in Figure 3. The basicity coefficient (Kb = (CaO + MgO)/(SiO2 + Al2O3)) of slag is 0.95 and hence can be classified to be acid slag. The slag has an activity coefficient (HM = CaO + MgO + Al2O3)/SiO2) of 1.85.Figure 3
XRD pattern of slag material.


### 2.1.3. Superplasticizer and Water

Three types of superplasticizers were used in this experiment: a polynaphthalene sulfonate (PNS), a polymelamine sulfonate (PMS), and a polycarboxylate (PC), all in powder form and purchased from BASF (Figure4). Tap water with a pH of 7.5 was used as mixing water to achieve the desired consistency of the slurry [26]. The water mainly contains Ca (45.33 ppm), Na (4.62 ppm), and Mg (2.74 ppm) [27].Figure 4
Three types of superplasticizers used in the test.


## 2.1.1. Tailings

The tailings used in the tests were unclassified tailings of a gold mine in Shandong province, China. The particle size distribution of tailings was determined by Malvern Laser Mastersizer 2000 and the results are shown in Figure1 and Table 1. The volume proportion of −20 μm particles in the tailings is 42.9%, which can be classified as medium tailings [25]. The coefficient of curvature and coefficient of uniformity are 0.50 and 25.75, respectively. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) results showed that the main chemical components of tailings were SiO2 (62.5%), Al2O3 (16.2%), K2O (8.11%), Na2O (3.07%), and CaO (2.98%), and some trace ingredients were also found. X-ray diffraction (XRD) test results showed that the tailing is mainly composed of quartz, albite, and mica (Figure 2).Figure 1
Particle size distribution curves for tailings, OPC, and slag.Table 1
Main physical and chemical properties of tailings, OPC, and slag.
Chemical composition (wt.%)TailingsOPCSlagPhysical propertiesTailingsOPCSlagCaO2.9862.3440.01Specific gravity2.683.32.90Fe2O31.725.060.38Specific surface (cm2/g)347058086198SiO262.521.4333.80−20μm content (%)42.966.370.1Al2O316.24.2515.71Cu25.753.293.38MgO0.522.616.90Cc0.501.251.10Na2O3.070.410.05Pozzolanic strength index (%)K2O8.110.730.447 daysN/AN/A69.6SO30.451.480.1828 daysN/AN/A90.4Figure 2
XRD pattern of tailings.


## 2.1.2. Binders

The binder agents used in this study were a commercial OPC (viz., PO 42.5R, used as a reference) and a slag-based binder. The slag-based binder material consists of slag (70%) and compound activator (30%). The main components of the compound activator are a sulphate, a silicate, and an alkali metal salt. The particle size distribution of the slag was determined by Malvern Laser Mastersizer 2000 (Figure1). Fine particles (−20 μm) content in the slag accounted for 70.1%, and the coefficients of curvature and coefficient of uniformity are 1.10 and 3.38, respectively. XRF analysis was used to determine the main chemical components of the slag, and the results showed that the slag mainly contained CaO (40.01 wt.%), SiO2 (33.8 wt.%), Al2O3 (15.71 wt.%), and MgO (6.90 wt.%) and some trace chemical components (Table 1). The XRD analysis of Slag shows a diffuse diffraction pattern typical of an amorphous glassy material, as shown in Figure 3. The basicity coefficient (Kb = (CaO + MgO)/(SiO2 + Al2O3)) of slag is 0.95 and hence can be classified to be acid slag. The slag has an activity coefficient (HM = CaO + MgO + Al2O3)/SiO2) of 1.85.Figure 3
XRD pattern of slag material.


## 2.1.3. Superplasticizer and Water

Three types of superplasticizers were used in this experiment: a polynaphthalene sulfonate (PNS), a polymelamine sulfonate (PMS), and a polycarboxylate (PC), all in powder form and purchased from BASF (Figure4). Tap water with a pH of 7.5 was used as mixing water to achieve the desired consistency of the slurry [26]. The water mainly contains Ca (45.33 ppm), Na (4.62 ppm), and Mg (2.74 ppm) [27].Figure 4
Three types of superplasticizers used in the test.


## 2.2. Mix Proportions

This experiment is divided into two stages. Stage I: three different types of superplasticizers were tested for water reduction effects under different dosages, and the best type of superplasticizer was selected. Stage II: based on the optimal type of superplasticizer, the effects of curing age, solid content, and binder content on water-reducing effect were studied. The solid content is the ratio of solids (tailing and binder) to total mass. The binder content is the mass ratio between binder and solids. The superplasticizer dosage is the ratio of the mass of the superplasticizer to the total mass of solids. The details of the CPB mixtures are summarized in Table2.Table 2
Mix proportions of fresh CPB.
StageFactorsSuperplasticizer typeBinder typeSuperplasticizer content (‰)Binder content (%)Solid content (%)Curing time (min)ITypes and dosage of superplasticizerPNSSlag-based binder0, 0.36, 0.73, 1.09, 1.45, 1.819.1760PMSSlag-based binder0, 0.36, 0.73, 1.09, 1.45, 1.819.1760PCSlag-based binder0, 0.36, 0.54, 1.099.1760IICuring timePCSlag-based binder, OPC0, 0.36, 0.549.1760PCSlag-based binder, OPC0, 0.36, 0.549.17630PCSlag-based binder, OPC0, 0.36, 0.549.17660PCSlag-based binder, OPC0, 0.36, 0.549.176120Solid contentPCSlag-based binder0, 0.36, 0.549.1760PCSlag-based binder0, 0.36, 0.549.1770PCSlag-based binder0, 0.36, 0.549.1780Binder contentPCSlag-based binder0, 0.36, 0.544.8760PCSlag-based binder0, 0.36, 0.549.1760PCSlag-based binder0, 0.36, 0.5414.3760PCSlag-based binder0, 0.36, 0.5420.0760


## 2.3. Sample Preparation and Rheological Test

The CPB samples with different superplasticizer types and dosages, curing time, solid content, and binder content were prepared using a double spiral mixer. Before mechanical mixing, the preweighed tailings, binder, and superplasticizer were homogenized by hand. Then, the required water was added to the solids, followed by 2 minutes of slow stirring and 2 minutes of fast stirring (see Figures5 and 6).Figure 5
Flow chart of the mixing and rheological measurement sequence.Figure 6
The preparation stages of CPB samples: (a) mixing, (b) curing, and (c) testing.
(a)(b)(c)The Brookfield RSR-SST rheometer with a four-bladed vane (diameter of 20 mm and length of 40 mm) was used for rheological tests. The rotor was first sheared in 60 s with a shear rate of 100 s−1, and then the shear rate was reduced to 0.001 s−1 within 60 s. In this study, the upper and lower boundary of the cross plate, the side boundary distance, and the test container boundary distance are both larger than the size requirements specified in ASTM D4648/D4648M-16. Therefore, the boundary effect can be ignored. Each set of experiments were repeated at least 3 times to ensure the repeatability and accuracy of the results.The Bingham model was used to fit the shear stress-shear rate data of the descending section (100 s−1  ⟶  0.0001 s−1), so as to obtain the rheological parameters (yield shear stress and plastic viscosity) of the slurry. It should be noted that the model fitting correlation coefficients R2 obtained in this experiment were all higher than 0.98:(1)τ=τ0+η⋅γ,where τ is the shear stress (Pa); τ0 is shear yield stress (Pa); η is the plastic viscosity (Pa·s); and γ is the shear rate (s−1).


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Effects of Types and Dosages of Superplasticizers

Figure7 shows the influence of different superplasticizer types and dosages on the rheological parameters of Slag-CPBs at 0 min. It should be noted that the absence of rheological parameters of Slag-CPBs with 1.45‰ and 1.81‰ PC is due to serious bleeding. It can be seen from the figure that the type and dosage of superplasticizer have a significant influence on the rheological parameters of Slag-CPBs. Regardless of the type of superplasticizer, with the increase of superplasticizer dosage, the shear yield stress and plastic viscosity of the Slag-CPBs decreases gradually; that is, the fluidity of slurry is gradually improved. A similar observation has also been obtained by previous studies (e.g., [28, 29]).Figure 7
Effects of superplasticizer types and dosages on the development of (a) yield stress and (b) plastic viscosity of CPB.
(a)(b)The results in Figure7 also indicate that the type of the superplasticizer has a significant influence on the rheological properties of Slag-CPBs. One can observe that the PC is more efficient in improving the fluidity of Slag-CPBs, compared to the PMS and PNS. A similar observation was also made on CPB made of blended cement (80% slag and 20% Portland cement) by Ouattara et al. [30]. PC significantly reduces both yield stress and plastic viscosity of Slag-CPBs, and this positive effect increases approximately linearly with the PC dosage. At relatively low dosages, PNS shows a good improvement effect on the plastic viscosity of slurry, but when the dosage reaches 0.72‰, the water-reducing effect tends to be saturated. PMS has the worst water-reducing effect, and its water-reducing effect does not change significantly with the increase of dosage compared with PC and PNS. It can also be seen from Figure 7 that, with the increase of superplasticizer dosage, the difference of water-reducing effect between PC and other superplasticizers gradually increases. The saturated content of PC is much lower than that of PNS and PMS. In addition, by comparing Figures 7(a) and 7(b), it can be seen that the influence degree of superplasticizer on yield stress is higher than that on plastic viscosity.


### 3.2. Time-Dependent Evolution of Rheological Properties

Figure8 shows the time-dependent evolution of the rheological properties of OPC and Slag-CPBs with different PC dosages. It is obvious that the yield stress and plastic viscosity of all samples increased with the increase of curing time regardless of PC dosage and binder type. This is mainly because with the increase of curing time, the amount of binder hydration products continues to increase [31, 32]. In absence of the PC, both yield stress and plastic viscosity of OPC-CPB are higher than those of Slag-CPB. This is because the absolute Zeta potential of slag particles is higher than that of cement particles [33, 34]. The binder type significantly affects the effect of PC. The water-reducing effect of the PC on OPC-CPBs is stronger than that of Slag-CPBs. This observation is contrary to the results of the investigations conducted by Ouattara et al. [30], who concluded that the blended binder made of 80% Slag and 20% OPC appeared to be more compatible with the PC compared to the OPC. Moreover, Adjoudj et al. [35] demonstrated that PC superplasticizer becomes more effective when Slag is incorporated. These difference in the effect of PC indicates that the compound activator used in the study significantly reduces the adsorption of PC to the Slag particles.Figure 8
Time-dependent evolution of (a) yield stress and (b) plastic viscosity of CPB containing different binder types and PC dosages.
(a)(b)The results in Figure8 also show that, regardless of the binder type, the rheological parameters of the sample containing PC grow at a higher rate over time than those of the sample without PC; that is, the effect of PC degrades over time. This is because with the continuous hydration of the binder, the hydration products generated will cover the absorbent PC on the surface of solid particles, thus resulting in the degradation of the effect of PC. Moreover, the degradation effect of the PC with time is more obvious in Slag-CPBs than that of OPC-CPBs.


### 3.3. Effect of Solid Content

The influence of PC on the rheological parameters of Slag-CPBs with different solid contents (76%, 77%, and 78%) is shown in Figure9. The binder content of all samples is 9.1. As can be seen from Figure 9, with the solid content increasing from 76% to 77% and 78%, the shear yield stress of CPB without PC increases from 142 Pa to 201 Pa and 247 Pa, and the corresponding plastic viscosity increases from 0.59 Pa·s to 0.83 Pa·s and 1.17 Pa·s. This indicates that only a slight increase in solid content can result in a significant increase in rheological parameters for high solid content CPB. This observation is consistent with the results of the investigations conducted by Ouattara et al. [36].Figure 9
Effects of solid contents and PC dosages on the development of (a) yield stress and (b) plastic viscosity of CPB.
(a)(b)Figure10 shows the percentage decrease of rheological parameters of Slag-CPB with different solid contents and PC dosages. It can be seen from the figure that the degree of improvement in yield stress with different solid contents depends on PC dosages. When the PC dosage is low (0.36‰), the effect of PC on shear yield stress increases with increasing solid content. However, when a high dosage PC (0.54‰) is added, the water-reducing effect tends to weaken with increasing solid content. The results in Figure 10 also show that when the PC dosage is fixed, the degree of improvement in plastic viscosity of PC is positively correlated with the solid content. However, Yang et al. [19] reported that as the solids content increases, the cemented tailings backfill samples with a higher dosage of superplasticizer have a lower rate of decrease in fluidity. This difference in the effect of superplasticizer with increasing solid content can be attributed to the difference in the composition of binder and tailings.Figure 10
Effects of solid contents and PC dosages on the percentage reduction of (a) yield stress and (b) plastic viscosity of CPB.
(a)(b)


### 3.4. Effects of Binder Content

The rheological parameters variation of fresh Slag-CPBs with different binder contents and PC dosages is shown in Figure11. The results presented in Figure 11 show that the shear yield stress and plastic viscosity of the slurry without PC increase gradually with the increase of the binder content. Similar results have been observed by Sandeep et al. [22], Simon and Grabinsky [37], and Phan et al. [38]. However, the rate of the increase in rheological parameters decreases gradually with the PC dosage. Compared with the solid content, the binder content has less influence on the rheological parameters (see Figures 9 and 11). When the PC dosage is low (0.36‰), the higher the water-to-cement ratio, the higher the yield stress and plastic viscosity of CPB samples. When the PC dosage is high (0.54‰), the yield stress and plastic viscosity of slurry with different solid contents are basically the same.Figure 11
Effects of binder content and PC dosages on the development of (a) yield stress and (b) plastic viscosity of CPB.
(a)(b)Figure12 illustrates the influence of the PC dosages on the percentage reduction of rheological parameters. The results in Figure 12 show that when the PC dosage is low (0.36‰), the positive effect of PC on yield stress increases, while this effect on plastic viscosity decreases as the binder content increases. When the PC content is high (0.54‰), the improvement effect of PC on the yield stress basically does not change with the increase of the binder content, while the corresponding improvement effect of plastic viscosity is more significant.Figure 12
Effects of binder content and PC dosages on the percentage reduction of (a) yield stress and (b) plastic viscosity of CPB.
(a)(b)


## 3.1. Effects of Types and Dosages of Superplasticizers

Figure7 shows the influence of different superplasticizer types and dosages on the rheological parameters of Slag-CPBs at 0 min. It should be noted that the absence of rheological parameters of Slag-CPBs with 1.45‰ and 1.81‰ PC is due to serious bleeding. It can be seen from the figure that the type and dosage of superplasticizer have a significant influence on the rheological parameters of Slag-CPBs. Regardless of the type of superplasticizer, with the increase of superplasticizer dosage, the shear yield stress and plastic viscosity of the Slag-CPBs decreases gradually; that is, the fluidity of slurry is gradually improved. A similar observation has also been obtained by previous studies (e.g., [28, 29]).Figure 7
Effects of superplasticizer types and dosages on the development of (a) yield stress and (b) plastic viscosity of CPB.
(a)(b)The results in Figure7 also indicate that the type of the superplasticizer has a significant influence on the rheological properties of Slag-CPBs. One can observe that the PC is more efficient in improving the fluidity of Slag-CPBs, compared to the PMS and PNS. A similar observation was also made on CPB made of blended cement (80% slag and 20% Portland cement) by Ouattara et al. [30]. PC significantly reduces both yield stress and plastic viscosity of Slag-CPBs, and this positive effect increases approximately linearly with the PC dosage. At relatively low dosages, PNS shows a good improvement effect on the plastic viscosity of slurry, but when the dosage reaches 0.72‰, the water-reducing effect tends to be saturated. PMS has the worst water-reducing effect, and its water-reducing effect does not change significantly with the increase of dosage compared with PC and PNS. It can also be seen from Figure 7 that, with the increase of superplasticizer dosage, the difference of water-reducing effect between PC and other superplasticizers gradually increases. The saturated content of PC is much lower than that of PNS and PMS. In addition, by comparing Figures 7(a) and 7(b), it can be seen that the influence degree of superplasticizer on yield stress is higher than that on plastic viscosity.


## 3.2. Time-Dependent Evolution of Rheological Properties

Figure8 shows the time-dependent evolution of the rheological properties of OPC and Slag-CPBs with different PC dosages. It is obvious that the yield stress and plastic viscosity of all samples increased with the increase of curing time regardless of PC dosage and binder type. This is mainly because with the increase of curing time, the amount of binder hydration products continues to increase [31, 32]. In absence of the PC, both yield stress and plastic viscosity of OPC-CPB are higher than those of Slag-CPB. This is because the absolute Zeta potential of slag particles is higher than that of cement particles [33, 34]. The binder type significantly affects the effect of PC. The water-reducing effect of the PC on OPC-CPBs is stronger than that of Slag-CPBs. This observation is contrary to the results of the investigations conducted by Ouattara et al. [30], who concluded that the blended binder made of 80% Slag and 20% OPC appeared to be more compatible with the PC compared to the OPC. Moreover, Adjoudj et al. [35] demonstrated that PC superplasticizer becomes more effective when Slag is incorporated. These difference in the effect of PC indicates that the compound activator used in the study significantly reduces the adsorption of PC to the Slag particles.Figure 8
Time-dependent evolution of (a) yield stress and (b) plastic viscosity of CPB containing different binder types and PC dosages.
(a)(b)The results in Figure8 also show that, regardless of the binder type, the rheological parameters of the sample containing PC grow at a higher rate over time than those of the sample without PC; that is, the effect of PC degrades over time. This is because with the continuous hydration of the binder, the hydration products generated will cover the absorbent PC on the surface of solid particles, thus resulting in the degradation of the effect of PC. Moreover, the degradation effect of the PC with time is more obvious in Slag-CPBs than that of OPC-CPBs.


## 3.3. Effect of Solid Content

The influence of PC on the rheological parameters of Slag-CPBs with different solid contents (76%, 77%, and 78%) is shown in Figure9. The binder content of all samples is 9.1. As can be seen from Figure 9, with the solid content increasing from 76% to 77% and 78%, the shear yield stress of CPB without PC increases from 142 Pa to 201 Pa and 247 Pa, and the corresponding plastic viscosity increases from 0.59 Pa·s to 0.83 Pa·s and 1.17 Pa·s. This indicates that only a slight increase in solid content can result in a significant increase in rheological parameters for high solid content CPB. This observation is consistent with the results of the investigations conducted by Ouattara et al. [36].Figure 9
Effects of solid contents and PC dosages on the development of (a) yield stress and (b) plastic viscosity of CPB.
(a)(b)Figure10 shows the percentage decrease of rheological parameters of Slag-CPB with different solid contents and PC dosages. It can be seen from the figure that the degree of improvement in yield stress with different solid contents depends on PC dosages. When the PC dosage is low (0.36‰), the effect of PC on shear yield stress increases with increasing solid content. However, when a high dosage PC (0.54‰) is added, the water-reducing effect tends to weaken with increasing solid content. The results in Figure 10 also show that when the PC dosage is fixed, the degree of improvement in plastic viscosity of PC is positively correlated with the solid content. However, Yang et al. [19] reported that as the solids content increases, the cemented tailings backfill samples with a higher dosage of superplasticizer have a lower rate of decrease in fluidity. This difference in the effect of superplasticizer with increasing solid content can be attributed to the difference in the composition of binder and tailings.Figure 10
Effects of solid contents and PC dosages on the percentage reduction of (a) yield stress and (b) plastic viscosity of CPB.
(a)(b)


## 3.4. Effects of Binder Content

The rheological parameters variation of fresh Slag-CPBs with different binder contents and PC dosages is shown in Figure11. The results presented in Figure 11 show that the shear yield stress and plastic viscosity of the slurry without PC increase gradually with the increase of the binder content. Similar results have been observed by Sandeep et al. [22], Simon and Grabinsky [37], and Phan et al. [38]. However, the rate of the increase in rheological parameters decreases gradually with the PC dosage. Compared with the solid content, the binder content has less influence on the rheological parameters (see Figures 9 and 11). When the PC dosage is low (0.36‰), the higher the water-to-cement ratio, the higher the yield stress and plastic viscosity of CPB samples. When the PC dosage is high (0.54‰), the yield stress and plastic viscosity of slurry with different solid contents are basically the same.Figure 11
Effects of binder content and PC dosages on the development of (a) yield stress and (b) plastic viscosity of CPB.
(a)(b)Figure12 illustrates the influence of the PC dosages on the percentage reduction of rheological parameters. The results in Figure 12 show that when the PC dosage is low (0.36‰), the positive effect of PC on yield stress increases, while this effect on plastic viscosity decreases as the binder content increases. When the PC content is high (0.54‰), the improvement effect of PC on the yield stress basically does not change with the increase of the binder content, while the corresponding improvement effect of plastic viscosity is more significant.Figure 12
Effects of binder content and PC dosages on the percentage reduction of (a) yield stress and (b) plastic viscosity of CPB.
(a)(b)


## 4. Conclusions

In this study, the rheological properties of the Slag-CPBs under different superplasticizer types and dosages were tested, and the influences of solid content and binder content were analysed. The following main conclusions can be drawn:(1)
Both yield stress and plastic viscosity of the Slag-CPBs decrease with increasing superplasticizer dosage; that is, the flow characteristic of slurry increases. Different superplasticizer types have significant differences in water-reducing effects. The PC has the best water-reducing effect, followed by the PMS and PNS.(2)
The yield stress and plastic viscosity of OPC-CPBs are higher than those of Slag-CPBs. The water-reducing effect of PC on OPC-CPBs is stronger than that of Slag-CPBs. The degradation rate of the water-reducing effect in Slag-CPBs is significantly higher than that in OPC-CPBs.(3)
The shear yield stress and plastic viscosity of the Slag-CPB without the addition of PC increase rapidly with the solid content. The degree of improvement of PC to the shear yield stress of slurry with different solid contents depends on PC dosage. When PC dosage is low (0.36‰), the higher the solid content is, the higher the shear yield stress and plastic viscosity are. When PC is added at a higher dosage (0.54‰), the shear yield stress improves more obviously with the increase of solid content, while the plastic viscosity improves less.(4)
The shear yield stress and plastic viscosity of Slag-CPBs without the addition of PC increase with the increase of the binder content. When the PC dosage is low (0.36‰), the improvement effect of PC on yield stress is better and the improvement effect of PC on plastic viscosity is worse as the binder content increases. When the PC dosage is high (0.54‰), the improvement effect of PC on the yield stress basically does not change with the increase of the binder content, while the corresponding improvement effect of plastic viscosity is more significant.It is noteworthy that the binder in this paper contains only one mineral admixture. Therefore, in future work, we will study the coupling effect of ternary binder made of ordinary Portland cement, fly ash, and granulated blast furnace slag with a superplasticizer.



---

*Source: 6673033-2021-01-18.xml*