# Ethnopharmacology, Phytochemistry, and Pharmacological Properties ofThymus satureioides Coss.

Authors: Naoufal El Hachlafi; Abderrahim Chebat; Kawtar Fikri-Benbrahim
Journal: Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

Thymus satureioides Coss. (Lamiaceae) is a Moroccan medicinal plant locally known as “Azkouni” or “Zaitra.” It is widely used in traditional medicine to treat various ailments, including hypertension, diabetes, cold, fever, dermatological and circulatory disorders, immune problems, bronchitis, nociception, cooling, pharyngitis, cough, and influenza. The current review aims to critically summarize the literature on ethnopharmacological uses, chemical profile, and pharmacological investigations of T. satureioides in order to provide data support and scientific evidences for further investigations. Electronic databases such as Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, SciFinder, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and Medline were used to gather data on T. satureioides. Chemical characterization of T. satureioides essential oils (EOs) and extracts allowed to identify a total of 139 bioactive compounds, mainly belonging to the terpenoids, phenolic acids, and flavonoids classes. T. satureioides especially its essential oils exhibited numerous biological activities such as antibacterial, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antidiabetic, anticancer, antiparasitic, and hypolipedemic activities. In light of these findings, further studies to transmute the traditional application of T. satureioides into scientific-based information are strongly required. Additional in vivo pharmacological studies are recommended to validate the results of the in vitro studies. Moreover, comprehensive preclinical and clinical trials on the pharmacological mechanisms of action of this plant and its bioactive compounds on molecular targets should be performed. Finally, more efforts must be focused on toxicological assessments and pharmacokinetic studies, in order to ensure the safety and the efficiency of T. satureioides.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Thymus satureioides Coss. is a perennial shrub (10–60 cm in height) belonging to the Lamiaceae family and the genus Thymus [1, 2]. T. satureioides is an endemic Moroccan medicinal plant locally known as “Azkuni” or “Zaitra” [3]. This species is widely distributed in the arid and semiarid habitats of the Moroccan High Atlas and Anti-Atlas [1, 4].In Morocco,T. satureioides has been extensively used in folk medicine against numerous diseases, including arterial hypertension, diabetes, cold, fever [5, 6], dermatological and immune problems, digestive ailments [1, 7, 8], and metabolic disorders [9]. Ethnopharmacological investigations showed that T. satureioides is used for the treatments of bronchitis, skin ailments, nociception, circulatory disorders, urogenital problems, nervous and visual ailments, cooling, pharyngitis, cough, influenza, and as an antispasmodic agent [5, 10–12]. Phytochemical analysis of T. satureioides essential oils and extracts enabled to identify numerous bioactive compounds belonging to several chemical classes, including terpenoids, phenolic acids, flavonoids, steroids, alkaloids, and saponins [13–16].Several pharmacological reports based onin vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that T. satureioides, especially its EOs, exhibit various biological activities such as antibacterial [17, 18], antifungal [19, 20], antioxidant [21, 22], antidiabetic [2], anticancer [23], anti-inflammatory [24], insecticidal [25, 26], and hypolipedemic effects [27]. However, the targeted mechanisms of these pharmacological properties have been poorly investigated.Although numerous studies reported the ethnomedicinal properties and pharmacological effects ofT. satureioides, to the best of our knowledge, no review was published to summarize these reports and suggest the future pharmacological applications of this plant. Therefore, this review was designed to critically summarize all published works on ethnomedicinal uses, phytochemistry, and pharmacological properties of T. satureioides. The current paper aims to provide data support and prospect concerning future research studies on the biological potential of T. satureioides.


## 2. Research Methodology

All published works about the ethnomedicinal uses, phytochemical composition, and biological activities ofT. satureioides were collected, examined, and reported in the present review. An extensive bibliometric survey from different scientific databases such as ScienceDirect, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, SpringerLink, Google Scholar, and Medline was used to extract all relevant papers. A total of 79 peer-reviewed papers published in English and French languages were selected to compose this review. The data provided in case reports, editorial/letters, patents, conference papers, and symposiums were excluded because they were considered scientifically unreliable. The search keywords used are “T. satureioides, phytochemical composition of T. satureioides, T. satureioides EOs, biological activities of T. satureioides, the antimicrobial activity of T. satureioides, ethnobotanical study of T. satureioides, and the antioxidant effect of T. satureioides”. ChemDraw Ultra 12.0 Software was used to draw the chemical structures. IUPAC names of the reported chemical compounds were cheeked using PubChem databases (pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Botany, Ecology, and Biogeographic Distribution

T. satureioides is a bushy perennial shrub (10–60 cm in height) with erect branches [1, 2] (Figure 1). Its leaves are opposite, linear, or lanceolate, curled at the edges, grayish on top, and tomentose at the base. The flowers are grouped into ovoid glomerules. The corolla is bilabiate (1/2 cm) with pink or whitish petals [3]. Reproduction of T. satureioides occurs via sexual (seeds) and asexual route through bursts of stump, cuttings, and marcottage [1].Figure 1
Thymus satureioides at flowering stage.T. satureioides is an endemic Moroccan plant, geographically found in the Mediterranean, Thermomediterranean, and Mesomediterranean series, in forest clearings, scrub, matorrals, and low and medium mountains up to 2200 m altitude [3, 27]. This species grows on siliceous limestone substratum and rocky to moderately earthy soils in the High Atlas and Anti-Atlas of Morocco. From a climatic point of view, T. satureioides is located in the arid to subhumid bioclimate, with hot, temperate, and fresh variants [3].


### 3.2. Ethnomedicinal Use

T. satureioides is one of the medicinal plants commonly used in Moroccan folk medicine to treat many pathological disorders, including diabetes, arterial hypertension, digestives ailments, cold, fever, and respiratory problems [5, 6].Several ethnobotanical and ethnopharmacological surveys reported these practices and showed that the medicinal use ofT. satureioides depends on the plant’s part used (Table 1). The aerial parts of T. satureioides were used as a decoction and infusion to treat gastric disorders, chills, cold, fever, and headaches [11], as well as arterial hypertension and diabetes [5, 28]. In addition, Mouhajir et al. [35] showed that the aerial part decoction is used as food disinfectant and against cold and colic.Table 1
Ethnomedicinal use ofT. satureioides.
Study areaParts usedPreparation methodMedicinal useReferencesAgadir-Ida-Ou Tanane (Morocco)Aerial partsInfusion, decoction, cataplasms, and fumigationGastrointestinal complaints, influenza, colds, fever, headaches, affections of the annex glands of the digestive tract, respiratory problems, and menstruation pain in women[5]Agadir-Ida-Ou-Tanane Province (Southwest Morocco)Whole plant, flowers, leaves, and stemsInfusionRespiratory, digestive, skin, circulatory, genital, nervous, visual, and urinary problems[12]Beni Mellal (Morocco)LeavesDecoction and infusionDiabetes[28]High Atlas mountains (Morocco)Whole plantPowderGastrointestinal ailments (stomach ache and intestinal trouble) and respiratory disorders such as colds and coughs[29]Haouz-Rhamna region (Morocco)LeavesDecoction and infusionDiabetes[9]Er-Rich region (High Atlas of Morocco)Aerial partsDecoction and infusionGastric disorders, chills, cold, fever, headaches, digestive infections, and pain, and it is also used as an antispasmodic agent[11]Er-Rich regionAerial partsFumigationRespiratory diseases, digestive ailments[11]Agadir region (Morocco)LeavesInfusionDiabetes[30]Chtouka Ait Baha and Tiznit (Morocco)LeavesInfusion, maceration, and powderDiabetes[31]Western Middle Atlas region (Morocco)Leaves and stemsInfusionGastrointestinal disorders (bloating, diarrhea)[32]Zagora (Morocco)LeavesDecoction and powderDiabetes and used as antinociceptive agent[33]Azilal (Morocco)Aerial partsFumigation, infusionDigestive ailment, colds, and coughs[34]Seksaoua region, Western High Atlas (Morocco)LeavesDecoctionCooling, pharyngitis, cough, and influenza[10]MoroccoLeaves, aerial partDecoction, infusionCoughs and bronchitis[1]Beni Mellal region (Morocco)Whole plantInfusionGastrointestinal ailments[8]Berber Peoples of MoroccoAerial partsInfusionTreatment of cold and colic and as food disinfectant[35]Marrakech (Morocco)Aerial partsDecoctionDigestive ailments[36]Errachidia Province (Morocco)Leaves, flowerDecoctionArterial hypertension[37]Tata Province, MoroccoAerial partDecoctionHypotensive, digestive ailments, diabetes, colds[6]Region of Middle Oum Rbia (Morocco)Whole plant, leavesNot reportedDermatological, immune, and digestive and respiratory ailments[7]The whole plant is used to treat dermatological disorders, immune problems, digestive ailments, intestinal troubles, colds, and coughs [7, 8, 29]. The leaves of T. satureioides are mainly known to be used against metabolic disorders, in particular diabetes [9, 12, 31], as well as for the treatments of bloating and diarrhea [32] or against cooling, pharyngitis, cough, and influenza [10].Other ethnomedicinal studies reported thatT. satureioides was also used as an antispasmodic and antinociceptive agent, and for the treatment of bronchitis, skin ailments, circulatory disorders, urogenital problems, nervous and visual ailments, and menstruation pains [1, 5, 11, 12, 33].


### 3.3. Phytochemistry

Phytochemical screening ofT. satureioides EOs and extracts revealed the presence of a total of 139 bioactive compounds, which can be grouped into three main chemical classes, including terpenoids, phenolic acids, and flavonoids (Table 2).Table 2
Chemical compounds fromT. satureioides.
No.CompoundsParts usedExtractsReferences1ApigeninLeavesAlcohol[38]2LuteolinLeaves, Aerial partsAlcohol, methanol[14, 38]3EriodictyolLeavesMethanol[14]4ThymoninLeavesMethanol[14]5QuercetinAerial partsCrude extracts, ethyl acetate, methanol[39]6HesperetinAerial partsCrude extracts, ethyl acetate, methanol, aqueous[13, 27, 39]7Luteolin-3′-O-glucuronideLeavesMethanol[14]8Apigenin-7-O-glucosideAerial partsDichloromethane[39]9HyperosideAerial partsDichloromethane, ethyl acetate, methanol[39]10Luteolin-7-O-glucosideLeaves, Aerial partsAqueous, methanol[13, 14, 24]11Eriodictyol-7-O-glucosideLeavesMethanol[14]12Caffeic acidAerial parts, LeavesAlcohol, ethyl acetate, methanol[38, 39]13p-Coumaric acidLeavesAlcohol[38]14Ferulic acidLeavesAlcohol[38]15Rosmarinic acidAerial partsCrude extracts[27, 39]16Chlorogenic acidLeavesAlcohol[38]17Ursolic acidLeavesChloroform[14]18Oleanolic acidsLeavesChloroform[14]19(E)-Linalool oxideAerial partsEOs[40]20(E)-p-Menthan-2-oneAerial partsEOs[40]21(E)-Sabinene hydrateAerial partsEOs[40]22(E)-VerbenolAerial partsEOs[40]23(E)-β-OcimeneFlowering topEOs[41]24(Z)-DihydrocarvoneAerial partsEOs[40]25(Z)-Sabinene hydrateAerial partsEOs[40]261,10-di-epi-CubenolWhole plant, aerial partsEOs[19, 41]271,8 CineoleAerial partsEOs[40]28Thymol methyl ether (2-Isopropyl-5-methylanisole)Aerial partsEOs[40]293-OctanolWhole plant, aerial parts, flowering topEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[19, 23, 41]303-Tetradecen-5-yneLeavesEOs[42]313-Thujen-2-oneAerial partsEOs[16]323-δ-CareneAerial partsEOs[40]33AlloaromadendreneAerial parts, flowering topEOs[40, 41]34AlloocimeneAerial partsPetroleum ether, EOs[23, 43]35AromadendreneAerial partsEOs[40]36BicyclogermacreneFlowering top, aerial partsEOs[41, 44]37BorneolAerial parts, flowering topEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[23, 41, 45]38Bornyl acetateAerial parts, flowering topEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[23, 41, 45]39Bornyl formateAerial partsEOs[16]40CalameneneAerial partsEOs[40]41CalareneAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[23, 43]42CampheneAerial parts, whole plant, flowering topEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[19, 41, 46]43Camphene hydrateAerial partsEOs[44]44CampheniloneAerial partsEOs[44]45CamphorAerial parts, flowering topEOs[41, 47]46Carvacrol (5-isopropyl-2-methylphenol)Aerial parts, flowering topEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[23, 41, 47]47Carvacrol methyl etherAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[15, 21, 23]48CarvenoneAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[23, 44]49CarveolAerial partsEOs[40]50CarvoneAerial partsEOs[40]51Caryophyllene oxideAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[23, 40]52Cedrene oxideAerial partsEOs[48]53cis-Linalool oxideAerial parts, flowering topEOs[43, 44]54cis-OcimeneAerial partsEOs[44]55cis-α-BisaboleneLeavesEOs[42]56CopaeneAerial partsEOs[40]57CrithmeneAerial partsEOs[47]58Dehydro-p-cymeneAerial partsEOs[40]59Dihydrocarvone 1Aerial partsEOs[40]60Dihydrocarvone 2Aerial partsEOs[40]61DodecamethylcyclohexasiloxaneAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether[23, 43]62EucalyptolLeavesEOs[42]63EugenolAerial parts, whole plantEOs[19, 44]64FenchoneFlowering topEOs[16]65Geraniol formateAerial partsEthyl acetate[23]66Geranyl linaloolAerial partsEOs[40]67Germacrene-D-4-olFlowering topEOs[41]68GermacreneAerial partsEOs[15]69Guaia-3,9-dieneAerial partsPetroleum ether, EOs[23, 43, 48]70GuaiazuleneAerial partsEOs[40]71HexahydroindanAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether[23, 43]72HotrienolLeavesEOs[42]73Isoaromadendrene epoxideAerial partsPetroleum ether, EOs[23, 40]74IsoborneolAerial partsEOs[40]75Isobornyl acetateAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether[23, 43]76Isobornyl formateAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[23, 44]77IsoledeneLeavesEOs[42]78Isothymol methyl etherLeavesEOs[42]79LedeneAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether[23, 43]80Ledol 6-epi-cubenolFlowering topEOs[41]81LimoneneAerial parts, flowering topEOs[15, 41]82LinaloolAerial parts, flowering topEOs[41, 45]83Linalyl propionateAerial partsEthyl acetate, petroleum ether[23]84Thymol methyl etherAerial parts, flowering topEOs[40, 41]85MyrceneAerial parts, flowering topEOs[15, 41]86Octan-3-oneAerial partsEOs[45]87Octen-3-olAerial partsEOs[40]88p-Cymen-8-ol (2-(4-methylphenyl) propan-2-ol)Flowering topEOs[41]89p-CymeneAerial parts, flowering topEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[23, 41, 45]90PentasiloxaneAerial partsPetroleum ether[23]91PinocarveolAerial partsEOs[40]92p-Menth-2-en-1-olAerial partsEOs[40]p-Mentha-1.8-dieneAerial partsPetroleum ether, ethyl acetate[23]93SabineneAerial partsEOs[49]94Santolina trieneAerial partsEO, petroleum ether[23, 43]95SpathulenolAerial partsEOs[40]96tau-CadinolAerial parts, whole plantEOs[19, 44]97Terpinen-4-olAerial parts, whole plantEOs[19, 44]98TerpinoleneAerial partsEOs[40]99Thuja-2,4(10)-dieneAerial partsEOs[40]100ThujoneAerial parts, whole plantEOs[19, 44]101ThymolAerial parts, flowering topEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[23, 41, 42]102Trans-1,2-diphenylcyclobutaneAerial partsPetroleum ether[23]103trans-PinocarveolFlowering topEOs[41]104trans-Sabinene hydrateFlowering topEOs[41]105TricycleneAerial parts, whole plant, flowering topEOs[19, 41, 46]106ValenceneAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether[23, 43]107α-AmorpheneLeavesEOs[42]108α-CadinolAerial partsEOs[21]109α-CampholenalAerial partsEOs[44]110α-Campholene aldehydeAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether[23, 43]111α-CubebeneAerial partsEOs[40]112α-CurcumeneAerial partsEOs[44]113α-FeruleneAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether[23, 43]114α-GuajeneAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether[23, 43]115α-GurjuneneAerial partsEOs[44]116α-HumuleneAerial parts, flowering topEOs[15, 41]α-MuuroleneAerial partsPetroleum ether[23]117α-PanasisenAerial partsEOs[40]118α-PentasiloxaneAerial partsEOs[43]119α-PhellandreneAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether[23, 43]120α-PineneAerial parts, whole plantEOs[19, 46]121α-TerpineolAerial partsEOs[50]122α-ThujeneAerial parts, whole plant, flowering topEOs[19, 41, 46]123β-BourboneneFlowering topEOs[41]124β-CaryophylleneAerial partsEOs[47]125β-CubebeneAerial partsEOs[40]126β-GurjuneneAerial partsEOs[40]127β-IononeAerial partsEOs[40]128β-LinaloolAerial partsEthyl acetate[23]129β-OplopenoneAerial parts, whole plantEOs[19, 44]130β-PatchouleneAerial partsEOs[40]131β-PhellandreneFlowering top, aerial partsEOs[41, 48]132β-PineneAerial parts, flowering topEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[16, 23, 41]133γ-CadineneAerial parts, flowering topEOs[41, 47]134γ-CostolAerial partsEOs[48]135γ-MethyliononeAerial partsEOs[48]136γ-MuuroleneAerial parts, flowering topEOs[41, 42]137τ-MuurololAerial partsPetroleum ether[23]138γ-TerpineneAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[15, 23, 50]139δ-CadineneAerial parts, flowering topEOs[41, 50]


#### 3.3.1. Phenolic Compounds

Thanks to their phenolic group, the phenolic compounds such as phenolic acids, flavonoids, tocopherols, and tannins are considered as an important group of bioactive compounds that are responsible for a wide range of biological properties such as antimicrobial [51, 52], antioxidant [53] anticancer [54], and litholytic activities [55]. Besides their pharmacological potential, the phenolic compounds, particularly flavonoids, are involved in many physiological processes; they are included in the regulation and protection of vascular plants against several biotic and abiotic stresses [56–58].There are few studies investigating the chemical composition ofT. satureioides extracts. In fact, the phenolic profile of T. satureioides remains not well identified.Khouya et al. [24] have examined the phenolic composition of the T. satureioides aqueous extracts and reported that they contain high levels of phenolic compounds, which are represented by rosmarinic acid as major phenolic acid and luteolin-7-glycoside and hesperetin as major flavonoids. Another study showed that T. satureioides aqueous extracts were rich in total polyphenols (456.73 ± 6.94 mg caffeic acid equivalent/g of dry plant) and in flavonoid group (172.79 ± 2.12 mg rutin equivalent/g of dry plant) with rosmarinic acid, hesperetin, and luteolin-7-glucoside as major phenolic compounds [13].In a recent study, Tebaa et al. [59] showed that the aqueous extracts of T. satureioides aerial parts are rich in total polyphenols (285 ± 34.82 μg gallic acid equivalent/mL aqueous extract), in total flavonoids (25.83 ± 4 μg catechin equivalent/mL aqueous extract) and in total tannins (0.032 ± 0.002 μg tannic acid equivalents/mL aqueous extract).In addition, the chemical composition of the methanol extracts ofT. satureioides analyzed by a combination of chromatographic tools (reverse-phase HPLC and 1H NMR analyses) revealed the presence of flavonoids as the main constituents with five essential compounds: luteolin-3′-O-glucuronide, luteolin-7-O-glucoside, eriodictyol-7-O-glucoside, aglycone luteolin, and thymonin [14]. However, other molecules such as ursolic acid and oleanolic acids were identified in the chloroform extract of T. satureioides [14].The qualitative phytochemical analysis ofT. satureioides extracts (hydromethanol, chloroform, ethyl acetate, and butanol extracts) enabled to detect the presence of flavonoids, catechols, gallic tannins, and anthraquinones [60]. Moreover, the quantitative HPLC analysis of crude and organic extracts of T. satureioides aerial parts showed the presence of phenolic acids (caffeic acid and rosmarinic acid) and the flavonoids quercetin and hesperetin in crud and methanolic extracts, whereas rosmarinic acid, hyperoside, quercetin, and hesperetin were detected in ethyl acetate extracts [39].Interestingly, Kouar et al. [38] have determined the phytochemical profile of alcoholic extract of T. satureioides leaves, using the electrocoagulation and solvent extraction assays, and detected the presence of saponins, sterols, triterpene, tannins, and flavone aglycones. The quantitative analysis showed that T. satureioides alcoholic extract contains high levels of total polyphenols (70.2 ± 0.4 mg of gallic acid equivalents/g extract) and total flavonoids (52.7 ± 0.01 mg of quercetin equivalents/g extract). The high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis allowed to identify six compounds in this alcoholic extract, including four phenolic acids (12–14, 16) and two flavonoid compounds (1–2) [39].The phenolic compound content and nature vary depending on the extraction solvent, plant’s part used, plant’s origin, storage conditions, and analytical method used. Indeed, flavonoids are the main phenolic group detected inT. satureioides extracts with 11 compounds (1–11) (Figure 2). Moreover, five phenolic acids were identified (12–16) (Figure 3).Figure 2
Flavonoid compounds isolated fromT. satureioides extracts.Figure 3
Phenolic acids identified inT. satureioides.


#### 3.3.2. Volatile Compounds

Numerous studies have investigated and characterized the chemical composition ofT. satureioides EOs, particularly from the aerial parts.The chemical analysis showed thatT. satureioides EOs are mainly composed of borneol, thymol, carvacrol, camphene, α-pinene, α-terpineol, p-cymene, and linalool (Figure 4).Figure 4
Chemical structure of the main terpenoids identified inT. satureioides.The percentages and the nature of these volatile compounds vary noticeably depending on several intrinsic and extrinsic factors of the plant, including geographical origin, phenological stage, genotype, plant’s part used, and storage and extraction conditions [61, 62].Sbayou et al. [43] indicated that borneol and thymol are the chief components of T. satureioides EOs with 26.45% and 11.24%, respectively, followed by α-terpinyl acetate (10.99%), β-caryophyllene (8.24%), and camphene (7.16%). The studies carried out on T. satureioides from the High Atlas of Morocco indicated that carvacrol (26.5%) and borneol (20.1%) are the main compounds of its EOs, while thymol was not identified [15, 49].It is well seen that borneol, carvacrol, and thymol constitute the major proportion of the volatile compounds ofT. satureioides. Indeed, in an earlier study, Jaafari et al. [23] described the EOs of T. satureioides harvested in Tiznit region as a “borneol chemotype (59.37%),” those of Marrakech region (Asni-My Brahim) as “carvacrol (35.90%) and borneol (30%) chemotypes,” and the one of Beni Mellal region (Bin El Widane) as “borneol (51.98%) and thymol (26.81%) chemotypes,” thus showing a variation in chemotypes of the T. satureioides EOs according to harvest zones.A comparative study ofT. satureioides leaf and flower EOs, using simultaneous GC-FID and GC-MS tools, showed major differences regarding the main compounds of these two plants’ part EOs. Thereby, borneol (a monoterpene alcohol) was the main compound of the flowers EOs with 19.3%, followed by carvacrol (10.0%) and thymol (3.8%), while carvacrol (37%), thymol (13.7%), γ-terpinene (8.4%), and (E)-β-caryophyllene (6.6%) were the main components of the leaves EOs [41].Another study revealed the presence of 68 volatile compounds representing 93.3% ofT. satureioides aerial parts’ total EOs using capillary gas chromatography and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS) [40]. These volatile compounds mainly belong to the monoterpenoides class (monoterpene hydrocarbons, oxygenated monoterpenes, and phenolic monoterpenes) such as borneol, carvacrol, thymol, camphene, linalool, and camphor.


### 3.4.  Pharmacological Properties

Numerous pharmacological investigations have shown thatT. satureioides essential oils and extracts obtained from different plant parts possess various biological activities, including antibacterial, antioxidant, antifungal, antiparasitic, anticancer, antidiabetic, and anti-inflammatory effects (Figure 5).Figure 5
Pharmacological properties ofT. satureioides.


#### 3.4.1. Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial activity ofT. satureioides EOs and extracts, against a panel of bacterial strains, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, was reported in the literature [16, 63, 64].Indeed, the EOs obtained from different parts ofT. satureioides were evaluated against several pathogenic bacteria known by their drug multiresistance, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Table 3 summarizes the published works that investigated the antibacterial activities of T. satureioides. It lists the parts used, the tested extracts, the methods used, the tested strains, and the main results obtained.Table 3
Antibacterial activity ofT. satureioides.
Parts usedExtractsMethods usedBacteria testedKey resultsReferencesAerial partsEssential oil (0.93%)Broth microdilution methodStaphylococcus aureus CCMM B3MIC = 4.50 mg/mL[65]Micrococcus luteus ATCC 10240MIC = 4.50 mg/mLBacillus cereus ATCC 14579MIC = 2.50 mg/mLListeria monocytogenes ATCC 19115MIC = 4.50 mg/mLEscherichia coli ATCC 25922MIC = 18.00 mg/mLPseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853MIC > 18.4 mg/mLKlebsiella pneumoniaeMIC = 9 mg/mLStemAqueous extractPaper disc diffusion assayClavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis H195 isolateФ = 23.3 ± 2.4 mm[66]LeavesAqueous extractPaper disc diffusion assayClavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis H195 isolateФ = 16.4 ± 0.5 mm[66]Aerial partEssential oilAgar disc diffusion methodStaphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213Ф = 34.67 ± 0.33 mm[20]Escherichia coli ATCC 25922Ф = 20.67 ± 0.27 mmPseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853Ф = 7.00 ± 0.00 mmAerial partEssential oilMicrodilution assayEscherichia coli ATCC 25922MIC = 0.125%[67]Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853MIC = 1%Micrococcus luteus ATCC 14452MIC = 0.03%Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213MIC = 0.03%Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633MIC = 0.03%Salmonella typhimuriumMIC = 0.25%Bacillus cereusMIC = 0.015%Whole plantEssential oil (1.78%)Microdilution assayStaphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923MIC = 2.5μl/mL[17]Streptococcus fasciens ATCC 29212)MIC = 2.5μl/mLEscherichia coli ATCC 4157MIC = 5μl/mLPseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853MIC = 10μl/mLAerial partEssential oilAgar diffusion methodBroth microdilution methodEscherichia coli ATCC 25921Ф = 15 ± 0 mmMIC = 0.625 μl/mLMBC = 0.625 μl/mL[43]Escherichia coliФ = 21 ± 0 mmMIC = 125 μl/mLMBC = 125 μl/mLPseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853Ф = 0 ± 0 mmMIC > 20 μl/mLMBC > 20 μl/mLPseudomonas aeruginosaФ = 0 ± 0 mmMIC > 20 μl/mLMBC > 20 μl/mLEnterobacter cloacaeФ = 15.5 ± 0.7 mmMIC = 0.625 μl/mLMBC = 0.625 μl/mLStaphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213Ф = 23 ± 0 mmMIC = 0.312 μl/mLMBC = 0.312 μl/mLStaphylococcus aureusФ = 15 ± 0 mmMIC = 0.625 μl/mLMBC = 0.625 μl/mLEnterococcus faeciumФ = 16 ± 0 mmMIC = 125 μl/mLMBC = 125 μl/mLAerial partEssential oilAgar-dilution methodEnterobacter cloacae (clinical strain, nosoco.tech Abdel1)MIC = 2.9μg/mL[68]Escherichia coli CIP 54127MIC = 2.9μg/mLKlebsiella pneumoniae CIP 104216MIC = 2.9μg/mLP. aeruginosa ATCC 15442MIC = 11.7μg/mLSalmonella typhimurium ATCC 133115MIC = 2.9μg/mLListeria monocytogenes ATCC 35152MIC = 5.8μg/mLMethicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus (MRSA)MIC = 2.9μg/mLEnterococcus faecalis CIP A185MIC = 5.8μg/mLStreptococcus equinus CIP 56.23MIC = 2.9μg/mLStreptococcus pyogenes CIP 70.3MIC = 2.9μg/mLAerial partsEssential oilAgar diffusion methodBroth microdilution methodEscherichia coli ATCC25922Ф = 12.3 ± 0.6 mmMIC = 1.5%[40]Non-O1Vibrio choleraФ = 33.3 ± 2.9 mmMIC = 0.5%Pseudomonas aeruginosa CCMMB11Ф = 11.7 ± 1.5 mmMIC = 1.5%Enterobacter cloacaeФ = 11.7 ± 0.6 mmMIC = 1.5%Klebsiella pneumoniaeФ = 13.3 ± 0.6 mmMIC = 1.5%Staphylococcus aureus CCMMB3Ф = 29.3 ± 2.1 mmMIC = 0.125%Bacillus subtilis ATCC9524Ф = 34.3 ± 1.1 mmMIC = 0.003%Bacillus cereus ATCC14579Ф = 30 ± 0 mmMIC = 0.003%Aerial partsEssential oil (1.86%)Agar disc diffusionAgar dilution techniqueStaphylococcus aureus CCMM B3Ф = 29.67 ± 1.15 mmMIC = 1.78 mg/mL[15]Bacillus subtilis ATCC 9524Ф = 43.67 ± 1.53 mmMIC = 0.89 mg/mLBacillus cereus ATCC 14579Ф = 43.67 ± 1.53 mmMIC = 0.89 mg/mLMicrococcus luteus ATCC 10240Ф = 42.00 ± 1.73 mmMIC = 0.45 mg/mLEscherichia coli ATCC 25922Ф = 22.5 ± 1.32 mmMIC = 1.78 mg/mLEscherichia coli CCMM B4Ф = 23.00 ± 1.00 mmMIC = 1.78 mg/mLSalmonella sp. CCMM B17Ф = 22.33 ± 0.58 mmMIC = 1.78 mg/mLEnterobacter cloacaeФ = 21.00 ± 1.00 mmMIC = 1.78 mg/mLLeavesEssential oil (2.95%(v/w))Agar diffusion assayBacillus cereusФ = 12.5 mmMIC = 80 μg/mL[41]Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 5638Ф = 8.0 mmMIC = 640 μg/mLListeria monocytogenesФ = 14.5 mmMIC = 40 μg/mLAeromonas hydrophilaФ = 11.8 mmMIC = 160 μg/mLEscherichia coliФ = 9.0 mmMIC = 320 μg/mLProteus vulgarisФ = 7.4 mmMIC = 640 μg/mLPseudomonas aeruginosaNDMIC = 1280 μg/mLPseudomonas fluorescensФ = 7.2 mmMIC = 640 μg/mLSalmonella abonyФ = 7.8 mmMIC = 640 μg/mLInflorescences (flowers)Essential oil (2.95% (v/))Bacillus cereusФ = 13.8 mmMIC = 80 μg/mL[41]Staphylococcus aureus ATCC5638Ф = 8.4 mmMIC = 320 μg/mLListeria monocytogenesФ = 15.2 mmMIC = 40 μg/mLAeromonas hydrophilaФ = 14.2 mm; MIC = 80μg/mLEscherichia coliФ = 10.4 mmMIC = 160 μg/mLProteus vulgarisФ = 8.2 mmMIC = 320 μg/mLPseudomonas aeruginosaФ = 6.8 mmMIC = 640 μg/mLPseudomonas fluorescensФ = 8.0 mmMIC = 320 μg/mLSalmonella abonyФ = 8.6 mmMIC = 320 μg/mLAerial partEthanolic extractAgar-well diffusion methodBroth microdilution methodStaphylococcus aureus 25923Ф = 6 mmMIC = 6.25 mg/mLMBC = 12.5 mg/mL[69]Listeria monocytogenes 4032Ф = 8.1 ± 0.31 mmMIC = 6.25 mg/mLMBC = 12.5 mg/mLBacillus cereus ATCC 14579Ф = 13.2 ± 0.23 mmMIC = <0.5 mg/mLMBC = 1 mg/mLEscherichia coli ATCC 25929Ф = 6 mmMIC = 25 mg/mLMBC = 50 mg/mLPseudomonas aeruginosa 195Ф = 10 ± 0.043 mmMIC = 25 mg/mLMBC = 50 mg/mLSalmonella entericaФ = 6 mmMIC = 12 mg/mLMBC = 25 mg/mLAerial partEssential oilDisc diffusion assayEscherichia coliФ = 13.66 ± 0.43 mm[70]Bacillus subtilisФ = 26.21 ± 2.08 mmMycobacterium smegmatisФ = 28.34 ± 1.05 mmLeavesEssential oil (2.7%)Disc diffusion assayEscherichia coliФ = 15.5 mm[71]Staphylococcus aureusФ = 30.7 mmAcinetobacter baumanniiФ = 19 mmBacillus cereusФ = 16 mmEnterobacter cloacaeФ = 20 mmFlowerEssential oil (4.1%)Disc diffusion assayEscherichia coliФ = 20 mm[71]Staphylococcus aureusФ = 45 mmAcinetobacter baumanniiФ = 35 mmBacillus cereusФ = 38 mmEnterobacter cloacaeФ = 22 mmWhole plantEssential oilAgar diffusion methodMicrodilution methodStaphylococcus aureusФ = 16 mmMIC = 1.1% (v/v)[18]Bacillus cereusФ = 19 mmMIC = 1.1% (v/v)Escherichia coliФ = 14.25 mmMIC = 1.25% (v/v)Flowering plantEssential oilAgar dilution methodEscherichia coli O157:H7High antibacterial effect against the four pathogenic bacteria (MIC 0.05–0.4% (v/v))[72]Listeria monocytogenes 2812 1/2aSalmonella typhimurium SL 1344Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213Flowering topEssential oilAgar diffusion methodPseudomonas aeruginosa IHФ = 8 mm[73]Pseudomonas aeruginosa CECT 110TФ = 8 mmPseudomonas aeruginosa CECT 118Ф = 8 mmPseudomonas Fluorescens CECT 378Ф = 11 mmEscherichia coli k12Ф = 13 mmStaphylococcus aureus MBLAФ = 16 mmStaphylococcus aureus CECT 976Ф = 15 mmStaphylococcus aureus CECT 794Ф = 15 mmBacillus subtilis DCM 6633Ф = 19 mmBacillus capsulasФ = 18 mmEnterococcus faecium CECT 410Ф = 13 mmListeria innocua CECT 4030Ф = 21 mmListeria monocytogenes CECT 4032Ф = 19 mmAerial partEssential oil (3.2%)Microdilution assayEscherichia coli 1 from patientMIC = 0.33 mg/mL[64]Escherichia coli ATCCSMIC = 43 mg/mLEscherichia coli 2 from patientMIC = 0.36 mg/mLEscherichia coli 1 from raw sheep milkMIC = 0.51 mg/mLEscherichia coli 2 from Raw Sheep MilkMIC = 0.34 mg/mLEscherichia coli 3 from raw sheep milkMIC = 0.4 mg/mLEnterohemorragicEscherichia coli (EHEC) O157MIC = 0.21 mg/mLEnteropathogenicEscherichia coli (EPEC)MIC = 0.31 mg/mLEnterotoxigenicEscherichia coli (ETEC)MIC = 0.45 mg/mLEnteroaggregativeEscherichia coli (EAggEC)MIC = 0.5 mg/mLEnteroinvasiveEscherichia coliMIC = 0.7 mg/mLLeavesEssential oil 1.35% (v/w)Disc diffusion methodMicrobacterium testaceumHigh antibacterial effect (Ф > 20 mm)MIC = 0.025% (v/v)MBC = 0.033% (v/v)[63]Serratia marcescensImportant antibacterial activity (15 < Ф < 19 mm)MIC = 0.033% (v/v)MBC = 0.05% (v/v)LeavesAqueous extract 100 mg/mL (w/v)Disc diffusion methodMicrobacterium testaceumSlight antibacterial activity (Ф < 8 mm)[63]Serratia marcescensSlight antibacterial activity (Ф < 8 mm)Aerial partsEssential oilMicrodilution methodMycobacterium aurum A+MIC = 0.015% (v/v)MBC = 0.015% (v/v)[16]Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2-155MIC = 0.062% (v/v)MBC = 0.062% (v/v)Ou-Yahia et al. [67] assessed the antibacterial effect of the T. satureioides aerial part EOs against E. coli, Bacillus cereus, P. aeruginosa, Salmonella typhimurium, S. aureus, Micrococcus luteus, and Bacillus subtilis and showed a variable antibacterial activity of the tested EOs. The highest activity was observed against B. cereus and S. aureus with MIC values of 0.015% and 0.03%, respectively, while P. aeruginosa was the most resistant bacterium with a MIC value of 1%.In another study, testing of the bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects of EOs ofT. satureioides leaves and flowering top on E. coli, S. aureus, A. baumannii, B. cereus, and Enterobacter cloacae revealed a significant antibacterial activity (inhibition zone diameters (Ф): 16 mm < Ф < 30.7 mm for leaves EOs; 22 mm < Ф < 45 mm for flowering top EOs) and a bacteriostatic effect against all tested strains except B. cereus [71].Mekkaoui et al. [70] tested in vitro the antimicrobial effect of EOs of T. satureioides harvested at two different phenological stages (flowering and postflowering) against three pathogenic bacteria responsible for foodborne disease in Morocco (E. coli, B. subtilis, and Mycobacterium smegmatis). They showed that EOs obtained after the flowering stage were more active against the studied strains than those obtained in the flowering stage. In fact, the highest activity was shown against M. smegmatis followed by B. subtilis, while the weakest activity was noticed against E. coli [70]. In the same context, Oussalah et al. [72] evaluated the antibacterial potential of the T. satureioides flower EOs against four pathogenic bacteria including two Gram-positive bacteria: S. aureus and Listeria monocytogenes (2812 1/2a), and two Gram-negative bacteria: E. coli O157:H7 and S. typhimurium (SL 1344), using the broth microdilution method. The results indicated that S. aureus was the most sensitive bacterium with MIC = 0.05% (v/v) followed by E. coli O157:H7 and S. typhimurium (MIC = 0.2% (v/v)), while L. monocytogenes was the least sensitive bacteria to the tested EOs with MIC = 0.4% (v/v).More interestingly, Amrouche et al. [18] investigated both in vitro and in a food system the antibacterial activity of T. satureioides EOs, extracted from the whole plant, against foodborne bacteria (E. coli, S. aureus, and B. cereus). The paper disc diffusion and broth microdilution methods were used for the in vitro test and the beef minced meat was used as food model. Thereby, the addition of T. satureioides EOs to inoculated beef minced meat decreased the tested strain population after 4 days of storage. Moreover, in vitro investigations indicated that B. cereus was the most sensitive bacteria (Ф = 19 mm and MIC = 1.1%), followed by S. aureus (Ф = 16 mm, MIC = 1.1%) and then E. coli (Ф = 14.25 mm, MIC = 1.25%) [18].El Abdouni Khayari et al. [65] reported a good antibacterial activity of the T. satureioides aerial part EOs against B. cereus (Ф = 30.00 ± 0.50 mm, MIC = 2.25 mg/mL), followed by M. luteus (Ф = 26.70 ± 0.20 mm, MIC = 4.5 mg/mL), L. monocytogenes (Ф = 19.30 ± 0.60 mm, MIC = 4.5 mg/mL), S. aureus (Ф = 16.30 ± 2.10 mm, MIC = 4.5 mg/mL), K. pneumoniae (Ф = 19.00 ± 1.00 mm, MIC = 9 mg/mL), and E. coli (Ф = 11.70 ± 0.60 mm, MIC = 18 mg/mL), compared to standards: cefixime, gentamicin, and kanamycin, while no effect was observed against P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) [65].Another work demonstrated an antibacterial effect of EOs extracted from wild and cultivatedT. satureioides against Gram-positive (S. aureus, M. luteus, B. subtilis, and B. cereus) higher than against Gram-negative strains (E. coli (ATCC 25922), E. coli (CCMM B4), Salmonella sp., and E. cloacae) [15]. The highest activity was found for M. luteus (Ф = 49.17 ± 1.15 mm for wild TS, Ф = 29.67 ± 1.15 mm for cultivated TS), while the weakest activity was noticed against S. aureus (Ф = 30.33 ± 0.58 mm for wild TS, Ф = 47.83 ± 1.32 mm for cultivated TS). Moreover, a considerable activity was also noted against Gram-negative bacteria with inhibition zone diameters ranging from 19.00 ± 0.10 to 23.00 ± 1.00 mm. The microdilution approach revealed a promising antibacterial effect of the tested EOs with MIC values ranging from 0.45 to 1.78 μg/mL [15]. This remarkable antibacterial effect of the T. satureioides EOs is concordant with the results of an earlier investigation, which indicated that T. satureioides E.Os inhibit the growth of a panel of microorganisms (65 Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains), among which Aeromonas hydrophila, Vibrio cholera, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were the most sensitive bacteria with respective MIC values of 0.14 ± 0.4% (v/v), 0.14 ± 0.0% (v/v), and 0.16 ± 0.0% (v/v) [74].Recently, Meziani et al. [63] studied the antimicrobial effect of EOs and aqueous and methanolic extract from thyme leaves against Microbacterium testaceum and Serratia marcescens endophytic to date palm by using different approaches including quantitative and qualitative methods. They demonstrated that the EOs were more active against both reported bacteria than aqueous and methanolic extracts (Фs < 15 mm). Thus, these EOs have a great inhibition power against M. testaceum (Ф > 20 mm, MIC = 0.025%, MBC = 0.033%) and a good effect against S. marcescens (15 mm < Ф < 19 mm, MIC = 0.033%, MBC = 0.05%) [63].


#### 3.4.2. Antioxidant Activity

The use ofT. satureioides as a food preservative and against several pathologic disorders in Moroccan folk medicine encouraged the research teams to study the antioxidant potential of this plant species. In fact, several works reported the antioxidant activity of T. satureioides EOs as well as its extracts obtained from different plant parts (aerial parts, flowering top, and leaves) using different methods such as 2,2′-azino-bis 3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS) radical scavenging, ferric reducing power, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), 2,2-azobis 2-amidinopropane dihydrochloride (APPH), and β-carotene/linoleic acid bleaching assays [13, 21, 39, 75]. All published works that studied the antioxidant activity of T. satureioides EOs and extracts have been listed and summarized in Table 4.Table 4
Antioxidant effects ofT. satureioides.
Parts usedExtractsMethods usedFindingsReferenceAerial partsCrude extractDPPH free radical scavenging activity assayIC50 = 0.44 ± 0.06 mg/mL[39]FRAP assayIC50 = 41.41 ± 4.55 mmol/LEthyl acetate extractDPPH assayIC50 = 0.33 ± 0.02 mg/mLFRAP assayIC50 = 82.69 ± 2.29 mmol/LMethanolic extractDPPH assayIC50 = 0.71 ± 0.09 mg/mLFRAP assayIC50 = 55.99 ± 2.21 mmol/LAqueous extractDPPH assayIC50 = 0.85 ± 0.06 mg/mLFRAP assayIC50 = 25.46 ± 2.71 mmol/LDichloromethane extractDPPH assayIC50 = 0.48 ± 0.05 mg/mLFRAP assayIC50 = 33.48 ± 0.08 mmol/LAerial partsAqueous extractTBARS methodSignificant inhibition of lipid peroxidation product (MDA)[24]DPPH assayIC50 = 0.44 ± 0.01 mg/mLFRAP assayIC50 = 40.14 ± 4.55 mmol/gAerial partsAqueous extractABTS assayIC50 = 14.65 ± 0.36 μg/mL[76]Aerial partEssential oil (1.86%)DPPH assayIC50 = 167.00 ± 2.47 μg/mL[15]Reducing power techniqueIC50 = 176.89 ± 1.02 μg/mLAerial partsEssential oil (2%)DPPH assayIC50 = 0.21 ± 1.17 mg/mL[49]Reducing power assayIC50 = 0.23 ± 0.67 mg/mLβ-Carotene/linoleic acid bleaching assayIC50 = 0.21 ± 1.74 mg/mLABTS assayIC50 = 0.15 ± 0.36 mg/mLFlowering topEssential oilReducing power assayAbsorbance = 0.507 ± 0.019[73]DPPH assayPercent inhibition = 42.99%β-Carotene testPercent inhibition = 74.50%Aerial partEthyl acetate extractDPPH assayIC50 = 109.98 ± 3 μg/mL[60]Aerial partEssential oilReducing power assayPercent inhibition = 24.64 ± 0.03%[47]TEAC assayTEAC = 159.00 ± 0.01 mMof Trolox/mβ-Carotene bleaching assayPercent inhibition = 83.87 ± 0.10%DFRS assayPercent inhibition = 68.55 ± 0.01%Aerial partEssential oilFerric reducing capacityEC50 = 177.13 ± 2.1 mg/mL[46]DPPH assayIC50 = 122.53 ± 2.38 μg/mLLeavesMethanolic extractFree radical scavenging activity (DPPH° test)SC50 = 14.6 μg[14]Aerial partsEssential oilDPPH assayIC50 = 0.25 ± 0.03 mg/mL[43]β-Carotene/linoleic acid assayPercent inhibition = 81.78 ± 0.37%TBARS assayI50= 300.32 ± 1.50 mg/mLAerial partAqueous extractFRAP assayIC50 = 50.79 ± 2.02 mmol Trolox/g[13]Malondialdehyde (MDA) assayImportant antioxidant activityDPPH assayIC50 = 0.480 ± 0.010 mg/mLAAPH-induced oxidative erythrocyte hemolysis assayNeutralization of the free radicals liberated by the AAPHAerial partEssential oilReducing powerIC50 = 85.47 ± 0.95 μg/mL[21]β-Carotene/linoleic acid assayIC50 = 64.26 ± 0.70 μg/mLDPPHIC50 = 108.15 ± 1.54 μg/mLAerial partEssential oilDPPH assayIC50 = 0.81 mg/mL[44]Aerial partHot water extractDPPH assayIC50 = 15.99 ± 0.47 μg/mL[77]Reducing power assayIC50 = 20.33 ± 0.19 μg/mLβ-Carotene bleachingIC50 = 14.69 ± 0.69 μg/mLCold water extractDPPH assayIC50 = 53.42 ± 1.17 μg/mLReducing power assayIC50 = 64.32 ± 0.52 μg/mLβ-Carotene bleachingIC50 = 50.20 ± 0.33 μg/mLMethanol extractDPPH assayIC50 = 30.24 ± 0.19 μg/mLReducing power assayIC50 = 30.48 ± 0.52 μg/mLβ-Carotene bleaching testIC50 = 86.38 ± 0.85 μg/mLAerial partHexane extractDPPH assayIC50 = 275.71 ± 11.26 μg/mL[22]ABTS assayIC50 = 127.38 ± 3.83 μg/mLFRAP assay97.819 ± 0.377 mg equivalent ascorbic acid/g of extractDichloromethane extractDPPH assayIC50 = 8.18 ± 0.07 μg/mLABTS assayIC50 = 80.09 ± 0.65 μg/mLFRAP assay153.457 ± 0.247 mg equivalent ascorbic acid/g of extractEthyl acetate extractDPPH assayIC50 = 23.75 ± 0.67 μg/mLABTS assayIC50 = 85.16 ± 3.22 μg/mLFRAP assay123.004 ± 0.377 mg equivalent ascorbic acid/g of extractWater-ethanol extractDPPH assayIC50 = 3.86 ± 0.07 μg/mLABTS assayIC50 = 51.27 ± 0.82 μg/mLFRAP assay233.292 ± 0.377 mg equivalent ascorbic acid/g of extractLeavesHot aqueous extractDPPH assayIC50 = 0.343 ± 0.011 mg/mL[69]Iron-ferrous chelating power assayIC50 = 0.4539 ± 0.011 mg/mLCold aqueous extractDPPH assayIC50 = 0.652 ± 0.013 mg/mLIron-ferrous chelating power assayIC50 = 0.6394 ± 0.014 mg/mLEthanolic extractDPPH assayIC50 = 0.247 ± 0.011 mg/mLIron-ferrous chelating power assayIC50 = 0.3341 ± 0.012 mg/mLLeavesMethanolic extractDPPH assayPercent inhibition = 92.24%[75]Sbayou et al. [43] reported an important antioxidant activity of the EOs of T. satureioides aerial parts using different methods, namely, DPPH free radical scavenging, TBARS, and β-carotene/linoleic acid assays. In fact, the tested EOs exhibit a strong reduction of DPPH radical (IC50 = 0.25 ± 0.03 mg/mL) compared with ascorbic acid (IC50 = 0.25 ± 0.03 mg/mL) as standard antioxidant. However, the β-carotene/linoleic acid assay showed a moderate antioxidant capacity (I% = 81.78 ± 0.37%) compared to BHT (I% = 98.13 ± 0.94%) as positive control. Taoufik et al. [44] also investigated the antiradical capacity of the T. satureioides aerial part EOs using the DPPH scavenging test and reported an interesting antioxidant effect in a concentration-dependent manner. The IC50DPPH (IC50 = 0.81 mg/mL) value was slightly lower than the antioxidant standards BHT (IC50 = 0.11 mg/mL) and Covi-oxT (IC50 = 0.11 mg/mL).Another study assessed the antioxidant activity ofT. satureioides EOs using several in vitro assays, including ABTS, DPPH, β-carotene/linoleic acid bleaching, and reducing power assays, with quercetin and BHT as antioxidant standards [49]. The antiradical activity indicated that T. satureioides EOs exhibit stronger activity against free radical ABTS (IC50 = 0.15 ± 0.36 μg/mL) and DPPH (IC50 = 0.21 ± 1.17 μg/mL) than the used antioxidant standards. Moreover, β-carotene test and reducing power assays also showed high antioxidant activities with respective IC50 values of 0.21 ± 1.74 μg/mL and 0.23 ± 0.67 μg/mL [49]. In contrast, an investigation carried out by Alaoui-Jamali et al. [46] indicated that the T. satureioides aerial part EOs exhibit a moderate scavenging activity of DPPH radical (IC50 = 122.53 ± 2.38 μg/mL). The ferric (Fe3+) reducing capacity assay showed similar results with an EC50 value equal to 177.13 ± 2.1 μg/mL.In addition, the antioxidant capacity ofT. satureioides extracts was also studied by many researchers. Khouya and his coworkers [39] tested the antioxidant effect of ethyl acetate, methanolic, aqueous, dichloromethane, and crude extracts of T. satureioides aerial parts using DPPH radical scavenging, FRAP, and APPH assays and showed a higher reductive potential of these extracts than the reference compounds (Trolox). In fact, the highest reducing power of ferric metal was shown by the ethyl acetate fraction (IC50 = 82.69 ± 2.29 mmol Trolox/g of dry extract), and the lowest was observed for the aqueous fraction (IC50 = 25.46 ± 2.71 mmol Trolox/g of dry extract). The radical scavenging activity indicated that ethyl acetate fraction exerted the highest antioxidant activity with an IC50 value of 0.33 ± 0.02 mg/mL, followed by crude extract (IC50 = 0.44 ± 0.06 mg/mL), dichloromethane fraction (IC50 = 0.48 ± 0.05 mg/mL), and then methanolic fraction (IC50 = 0.71 ± 0.09 mg/mL). However, the aqueous fraction showed the weakest antiradical capacity (IC50 = 0.85 ± 0.06 mg/mL) [39]. Furthermore, the APPH test indicated that the addition of the tested extracts to suspensions containing erythrocyte and 2,2′-azobis 2-amidinopropane dihydrochloride (APPH) induced an increase in the hemolysis half times [39].The antioxidant activities ofT. satureioides extracts obtained from the aerial part were also examined by Labiad et al. [22] who reported remarkable antioxidant activities for hexane, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, and hydro-ethanolic extracts, using ABTS radical scavenging, DPPH, and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) methods, with ascorbic acid as positive control. The hydro-ethanolic extracts exhibited the highest antiradical effect against DPPH and ABTS radicals with IC50 values of 3.86 ± 0.07 μg/mL and 51.27 ± 0.82 μg/mL, respectively, followed by dichloromethane (IC50DPPH = 23.75 ± 0.67 μg/mL, IC50ABTS = 80.09 ± 0.65 μg/mL), ethyl acetate (IC50DPPH = 23.75 ± 0.67 μg/mL, IC50ABTS = 85.16 ± 3.22 μg/mL), and then hexane extracts (IC50DPPH = 275.71 ± 11.26 μg/mL, IC50ABTS = 127.38 ± 3.83 μg/mL). Moreover, the hydro-ethanolic extract also exerted a great FRAP activity (233.292 ± 0.377 mg equivalent Ascorbic acid/g of extract). However, the hexane extract showed the lowest FRAP capacity (97.819 ± 0.377 mg equivalent ascorbic acid/g of extract) [22].In a recent study, Hmidani et al. [76] measured the capacity of aqueous extract of T. satureioides to scavenge the generated radical ABTS+•, using ABTS assay, and showed significant scavenging activity of this extract (IC50ABTS = 14.65 ± 0.36 μg/ml) compared to ascorbic acid as standard (IC50 = 1.96 ± 0.1 μg/ml). These findings support those obtained by Khouya et al. [24], which showed a considerable antioxidant activity of the T. satureioides aerial part aqueous extract. Indeed, the tested aqueous extracts displayed potent scavenging activity against DPPH radical with an IC50 value equal to 0.44 ± 0.01 mg/mL TAE and a higher reducing power of ferric complex (40.14 ± 4.55 mmol Trolox/gTAE) than the Trolox used as positive control (44.33 ± 7.55 mmol Trolox/gTAE). Moreover, the aqueous extracts of T. satureioides exerted a potent protective potential against hemolysis of erythrocytes according to APPH test results [24]. These considerable antioxidant effects of the aqueous extracts were attributed to their high phenolic content [24].


#### 3.4.3. Antifungal Activity

The antifungal activity ofT. satureioides, especially its essential oils against several pathogenic fungal, has been reported in the literature [19, 50, 78, 79].Boukhira et al. [20] evaluated the antifungal activity of T. satureioides EOs obtained from aerial parts against a yeast, Candida albicans (ATCC-10231), and a mould Aspergillus brasiliensis (ATCC-16404), using radial growth inhibition and broth microdilution assays. This study showed that the studied EOs exert effective effect against C. albicans (Ф = 24.67 ± 0.67 mm, MIC = 0.6 μl/mL) and A. brasiliensis (MIC = 1.3 μl/mL).Asdadi et al. [19] studied the anticandidal activity of T. satureioides EOs (10 μl) against nosocomial fluconazole-resistant strains (Candida dubliniensis, C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. krusei) using disc diffusion and microdilution methods, with fluconazole (10 μl) and amphotericin B (10 μl) as positive controls. According to this study, C. dubliniensis was the most sensitive strain to the tested EOs (Ф = 85 mm), followed by C. krusei (Ф = 67 mm), while C. albicans and C. glabrata were the least sensitive fungal strains with Ф of 53 mm and 49 mm, respectively. The microdilution assays showed an interesting anticandidal effect with minimal fungicidal concentration (MFC) values ranging between 0.3300 mg/mL and 0.9062 mg/ml [19].In addition, El Bouzidi et al. [15] assessed the anticandidal activity of T. satureioides EOs obtained from aerial parts against four candida species, including C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and C. krusei using disc diffusion and microdilution assays, and fluconazol (40 μl) as reference. The findings of this study showed that all tested strains were more sensitive to the tested EOs (37.67 ± 1.53 mm < Ф < 42.00 ± 1.00 mm) than to the synthetic fungicide (fluconazol) used as a positive control (26.50 ± 0.50 mm < Ф < 29.83 ± 1.15 mm).More interestingly, Salhi et al. [50] reported the antifungal activity of four chemotypes of T. satureioides EOs from aerial parts, namely, borneol/α-terpineol, borneol/carvacrol/α-terpineol, borneol/carvacrol/thymol, and borneol/camphene/α-terpineol against fungal strains responsible of wood damages (Coniophora puteana BAM Ebw. 15, Gloeophyllum trabeum BAM Ebw.109, Oligoporus placenta FPRL. 280, and Trametes versicolor CTB 863). The studied samples were harvested from four different locations in Southwest Morocco (Oulad Berhil, Amskroud-East, Aoulouz, and Timoulay Aksri), and qualitative and quantitative assays were used for antifungal screening [50]. The results showed that, at a concentration of 1/500 (v/v), all tested chemotypes inhibit the growth of the tested wood-decaying fungi. However, the investigated chemotypes exhibited a variable degree of the antifungal effect. Therefore, the chemotype borneol/carvacrol/thymol was the most active against the tested strains, followed by borneol/camphene/α-terpineol, borneol/α-terpineol, and borneol/carvacrol/α-terpineol. Moreover, the highest antifungal activity was noticed against G. trabeum with MIC ranging between 1/1500 v/v and 1/500 (v/v), followed by C. puteana (1/1250 (v/v) <MIC< 1/500 (v/v)), T. versicolor (MIC = 1/500 (v/v)), and O. placenta (MIC = 1/500 (v/v)) [50].In the same context, Rahmouni et al. [42] reported fungicide effect of T. satureioides EOs and their major components (thymol, α-terpineol, carvacrol, and borneol) against a phytopathogenic fungus responsible for fusarium wilt on date palm in Morocco, named Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Albedinis. The results of this study showed that these EOs as well as their major compounds inhibited noticeably the mycelia growth of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Albedinis in a concentration-dependent manner. The maximal fungicidal effect of the studied compounds was noticed by thymol with a minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) value of 03.08 μl/mL, followed by α-terpineol (MFC = 12.20 μl/mL), carvacrol (MFC = 16.96 μl/mL), and borneol (MFC = 22.73 μl/mL) [42]. Furthermore, T. satureioides EO was found to inhibit spore germination of phytopathogenic fungi of citrus, namely, Penicillium digitatum, P. italicum, and Galactomyces citriaurantii at concentrations greater than 500 μl/mL [79].Recently, El-Bakkal et al. [21] tested the antifungal effect of the EOs of T. satureioides aerial parts against Botrytis cinerea, P. digitatum, and Verticillium dahliae using disc diffusion method and fluconazol (40 μg/disc) as standard antifungal drug. Their results showed a promising antifungal effect, of the studied EOs, against the three tested strains, with inhibition zone diameters ranging from 31.50 ± 1.32 mm to 36.27 ± 1.15 mm compared to fluconazol (25.50 ± 0.50 < Ф < 28.00 ± 0.50).


#### 3.4.4. Anti-Inflammatory Activity

Inflammation is a complex biological process that maintains homeostasis of the organism in response to multiple injuries such as infection, trauma, or immune reaction. It is characterized by pain, heat, redness, and swelling [80].Inflammation is related to the occurrence of several human pathologies, including heart diseases, Alzheimer’s disease, and cancer [81–83]. The mechanisms of the anti-inflammatory response involve various mediators such as phospholipase A2 activation, cytokines, chemokines, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, macrophages and mast cells, platelet-activating factor, and nitric oxide (NO) [83].Khouya et al. [39] have evaluated in vivo the anti-inflammatory activity of T. satureioides crude extracts and fractions (dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, methanol, and aqueous) using croton-oil-induced ear oedema and carrageenan-induced paw oedema in mice and rats. The results of this study showed that topical applications of the dichloromethane and ethyl acetate fractions (1 mg/ear) reduced significantly ear oedema volume of 31.60% and 27.16%, respectively, after 4 h of treatment. The crude extracts exhibited the greatest activity, and its tropical application decreased significantly ear oedema (29.67%) 8 h after treatment. However, the methanol and aqueous fractions did not decrease ear oedema. Moreover, the results of carrageenan oedema assay showed that the ethyl acetate and methanol fractions (60 mg/kg) reduced significantly oedema induced by carrageenan during the first phase (16.40 ± 0.33% and 14.51 ± 1.40%, respectively) [39]. This study confirmed results obtained by the same authors, indicating that aqueous extracts of T. satureioides exhibited a remarkable anti-inflammatory effect in carrageenan-induced rats paw edema and in croton oil-induced mice ear edema [24]. In another previous study, Ismaili et al. [14] investigated the in vivo topical anti-inflammatory effect of methanol and chloroform extracts of T. satureioides leaves, using the croton oil ear test in mice, and showed that chloroform extract induced significant edema inhibition (at a inhibition dose ID50 of 282 μg·cm−2), only three times lower than that of the standard conventional drug indomethacin used as positive control (ID50 = 93 μg·cm−2), while the methanolic extract did not show any topical anti-inflammatory activity.


#### 3.4.5. Antiparasitic Effect

T. satureioides EOs from different plant parts were studied against a number of human, virus, and plant parasites. Indeed, Pavela [84] assessed the toxicity of T. satureioides EOs against the larvae of Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae) and showed its effective larvicidal property with respective lethal concentrations (IC50 and IC90) of 44 μg/ml and 81.5 μg/ml.Kasrati et al. [49] reported a considerable insecticidal activity of T. satureioides EOs against adults of pest Tribolium castaneum responsible for stored-product deterioration (lethal dose values of LD50 = 0.315 μl/cm2 and LD90 = 0.71 μl/cm2). Moreover, Santana et al. [25] examined the toxicity of T. satureioides EOs against insect pest’s larvae of Spodoptera littoralis, insect adults of Myzus persicae and Rhopalosiphum padi, as well as against adults and eggs of root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne javanica. A strong antifeedant effect of T. satureioides EOs was observed against S. littoralis larvae (EC50 = 36.9 ± 22.7 μg/cm2), M. persicae adults (EC50 = 53.53 ± 6.5 μg/cm2), and R. padi (EC50 = 49.0 ± 6.6 μg/cm2). Additionally, an important nematicidal effect was noticed against the tested M. javanica at two different development stages: second-stage juveniles (J2) (LC50 = 0.1 mg/mL and LC90 = 0.2 mg/mL) and eggs (mortality rate of 38.9% after 7 days) [25].Another study conducted by Avato et al. [26] showed that T. satureioides EOs exhibit a promising nematicidal activity against Meloidogyne incognita juveniles (mortality rate of 10.6 ± 0.7%) and adults of Pratylenchus vulnus (100 ± 0.0%) and Xiphinema index (14.9 ± 0.7%) and that, after 48 h, this effect was dose-dependent.The acaricidal activity ofT. satureioides EOs was also reported in the literature. Ramzi et al. [85] studied the effect of the EOs of T. satureioides aerial parts against adults of Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae) and indicated an interesting mortality rate of 50% after 24 h and 80% after 48 h. Additionally, T. satureioides EO was shown to destroy completely the wheat pest Sitophilus oryzae (coleopters) at a concentration of 2.4 × 10−2 μl/cm3 after 24 h [86].


#### 3.4.6. Other Pharmacological Properties

T. satureioides was also reported to exhibit other pharmacological properties such as anticancer, antidiabetic, and hypolipidemic effects.Jaafari et al. [23] evaluated the in vitro antitumor activity of T. satureioides EOs collected in different regions (High Atlas of Morocco, Bin Elwidane-Beni Mellal, and Tiznit) on P815 mastocytoma cell line using the 3-(4,5-di-methylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. The results showed that all tested EOs exhibit an important cytotoxic effect against P815 cell line with IC50 values from 0.225% (v/v) to 0.24% (v/v). The antiproliferative effect of T. satureioides crude extracts was studied against MCF-7 breast cancer cell line using MTT assay and showed their strong inhibition with a half-inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of 37.5 ± 4.02 μg/mL [24].Kabbaoui et al. [2] investigated the antidiabetic effect of T. satureioides aqueous extracts obtained from the aerial parts on streptozotocin- (STZ-) induced diabetic rats via the administration of an oral concentration of 500 mg/kg. As a result, T. satureioides aqueous extracts decreased significantly blood glucose levels and improved body weight and glucose tolerance in STZ-diabetic rats.


## 3.1. Botany, Ecology, and Biogeographic Distribution

T. satureioides is a bushy perennial shrub (10–60 cm in height) with erect branches [1, 2] (Figure 1). Its leaves are opposite, linear, or lanceolate, curled at the edges, grayish on top, and tomentose at the base. The flowers are grouped into ovoid glomerules. The corolla is bilabiate (1/2 cm) with pink or whitish petals [3]. Reproduction of T. satureioides occurs via sexual (seeds) and asexual route through bursts of stump, cuttings, and marcottage [1].Figure 1
Thymus satureioides at flowering stage.T. satureioides is an endemic Moroccan plant, geographically found in the Mediterranean, Thermomediterranean, and Mesomediterranean series, in forest clearings, scrub, matorrals, and low and medium mountains up to 2200 m altitude [3, 27]. This species grows on siliceous limestone substratum and rocky to moderately earthy soils in the High Atlas and Anti-Atlas of Morocco. From a climatic point of view, T. satureioides is located in the arid to subhumid bioclimate, with hot, temperate, and fresh variants [3].


## 3.2. Ethnomedicinal Use

T. satureioides is one of the medicinal plants commonly used in Moroccan folk medicine to treat many pathological disorders, including diabetes, arterial hypertension, digestives ailments, cold, fever, and respiratory problems [5, 6].Several ethnobotanical and ethnopharmacological surveys reported these practices and showed that the medicinal use ofT. satureioides depends on the plant’s part used (Table 1). The aerial parts of T. satureioides were used as a decoction and infusion to treat gastric disorders, chills, cold, fever, and headaches [11], as well as arterial hypertension and diabetes [5, 28]. In addition, Mouhajir et al. [35] showed that the aerial part decoction is used as food disinfectant and against cold and colic.Table 1
Ethnomedicinal use ofT. satureioides.
Study areaParts usedPreparation methodMedicinal useReferencesAgadir-Ida-Ou Tanane (Morocco)Aerial partsInfusion, decoction, cataplasms, and fumigationGastrointestinal complaints, influenza, colds, fever, headaches, affections of the annex glands of the digestive tract, respiratory problems, and menstruation pain in women[5]Agadir-Ida-Ou-Tanane Province (Southwest Morocco)Whole plant, flowers, leaves, and stemsInfusionRespiratory, digestive, skin, circulatory, genital, nervous, visual, and urinary problems[12]Beni Mellal (Morocco)LeavesDecoction and infusionDiabetes[28]High Atlas mountains (Morocco)Whole plantPowderGastrointestinal ailments (stomach ache and intestinal trouble) and respiratory disorders such as colds and coughs[29]Haouz-Rhamna region (Morocco)LeavesDecoction and infusionDiabetes[9]Er-Rich region (High Atlas of Morocco)Aerial partsDecoction and infusionGastric disorders, chills, cold, fever, headaches, digestive infections, and pain, and it is also used as an antispasmodic agent[11]Er-Rich regionAerial partsFumigationRespiratory diseases, digestive ailments[11]Agadir region (Morocco)LeavesInfusionDiabetes[30]Chtouka Ait Baha and Tiznit (Morocco)LeavesInfusion, maceration, and powderDiabetes[31]Western Middle Atlas region (Morocco)Leaves and stemsInfusionGastrointestinal disorders (bloating, diarrhea)[32]Zagora (Morocco)LeavesDecoction and powderDiabetes and used as antinociceptive agent[33]Azilal (Morocco)Aerial partsFumigation, infusionDigestive ailment, colds, and coughs[34]Seksaoua region, Western High Atlas (Morocco)LeavesDecoctionCooling, pharyngitis, cough, and influenza[10]MoroccoLeaves, aerial partDecoction, infusionCoughs and bronchitis[1]Beni Mellal region (Morocco)Whole plantInfusionGastrointestinal ailments[8]Berber Peoples of MoroccoAerial partsInfusionTreatment of cold and colic and as food disinfectant[35]Marrakech (Morocco)Aerial partsDecoctionDigestive ailments[36]Errachidia Province (Morocco)Leaves, flowerDecoctionArterial hypertension[37]Tata Province, MoroccoAerial partDecoctionHypotensive, digestive ailments, diabetes, colds[6]Region of Middle Oum Rbia (Morocco)Whole plant, leavesNot reportedDermatological, immune, and digestive and respiratory ailments[7]The whole plant is used to treat dermatological disorders, immune problems, digestive ailments, intestinal troubles, colds, and coughs [7, 8, 29]. The leaves of T. satureioides are mainly known to be used against metabolic disorders, in particular diabetes [9, 12, 31], as well as for the treatments of bloating and diarrhea [32] or against cooling, pharyngitis, cough, and influenza [10].Other ethnomedicinal studies reported thatT. satureioides was also used as an antispasmodic and antinociceptive agent, and for the treatment of bronchitis, skin ailments, circulatory disorders, urogenital problems, nervous and visual ailments, and menstruation pains [1, 5, 11, 12, 33].


## 3.3. Phytochemistry

Phytochemical screening ofT. satureioides EOs and extracts revealed the presence of a total of 139 bioactive compounds, which can be grouped into three main chemical classes, including terpenoids, phenolic acids, and flavonoids (Table 2).Table 2
Chemical compounds fromT. satureioides.
No.CompoundsParts usedExtractsReferences1ApigeninLeavesAlcohol[38]2LuteolinLeaves, Aerial partsAlcohol, methanol[14, 38]3EriodictyolLeavesMethanol[14]4ThymoninLeavesMethanol[14]5QuercetinAerial partsCrude extracts, ethyl acetate, methanol[39]6HesperetinAerial partsCrude extracts, ethyl acetate, methanol, aqueous[13, 27, 39]7Luteolin-3′-O-glucuronideLeavesMethanol[14]8Apigenin-7-O-glucosideAerial partsDichloromethane[39]9HyperosideAerial partsDichloromethane, ethyl acetate, methanol[39]10Luteolin-7-O-glucosideLeaves, Aerial partsAqueous, methanol[13, 14, 24]11Eriodictyol-7-O-glucosideLeavesMethanol[14]12Caffeic acidAerial parts, LeavesAlcohol, ethyl acetate, methanol[38, 39]13p-Coumaric acidLeavesAlcohol[38]14Ferulic acidLeavesAlcohol[38]15Rosmarinic acidAerial partsCrude extracts[27, 39]16Chlorogenic acidLeavesAlcohol[38]17Ursolic acidLeavesChloroform[14]18Oleanolic acidsLeavesChloroform[14]19(E)-Linalool oxideAerial partsEOs[40]20(E)-p-Menthan-2-oneAerial partsEOs[40]21(E)-Sabinene hydrateAerial partsEOs[40]22(E)-VerbenolAerial partsEOs[40]23(E)-β-OcimeneFlowering topEOs[41]24(Z)-DihydrocarvoneAerial partsEOs[40]25(Z)-Sabinene hydrateAerial partsEOs[40]261,10-di-epi-CubenolWhole plant, aerial partsEOs[19, 41]271,8 CineoleAerial partsEOs[40]28Thymol methyl ether (2-Isopropyl-5-methylanisole)Aerial partsEOs[40]293-OctanolWhole plant, aerial parts, flowering topEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[19, 23, 41]303-Tetradecen-5-yneLeavesEOs[42]313-Thujen-2-oneAerial partsEOs[16]323-δ-CareneAerial partsEOs[40]33AlloaromadendreneAerial parts, flowering topEOs[40, 41]34AlloocimeneAerial partsPetroleum ether, EOs[23, 43]35AromadendreneAerial partsEOs[40]36BicyclogermacreneFlowering top, aerial partsEOs[41, 44]37BorneolAerial parts, flowering topEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[23, 41, 45]38Bornyl acetateAerial parts, flowering topEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[23, 41, 45]39Bornyl formateAerial partsEOs[16]40CalameneneAerial partsEOs[40]41CalareneAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[23, 43]42CampheneAerial parts, whole plant, flowering topEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[19, 41, 46]43Camphene hydrateAerial partsEOs[44]44CampheniloneAerial partsEOs[44]45CamphorAerial parts, flowering topEOs[41, 47]46Carvacrol (5-isopropyl-2-methylphenol)Aerial parts, flowering topEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[23, 41, 47]47Carvacrol methyl etherAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[15, 21, 23]48CarvenoneAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[23, 44]49CarveolAerial partsEOs[40]50CarvoneAerial partsEOs[40]51Caryophyllene oxideAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[23, 40]52Cedrene oxideAerial partsEOs[48]53cis-Linalool oxideAerial parts, flowering topEOs[43, 44]54cis-OcimeneAerial partsEOs[44]55cis-α-BisaboleneLeavesEOs[42]56CopaeneAerial partsEOs[40]57CrithmeneAerial partsEOs[47]58Dehydro-p-cymeneAerial partsEOs[40]59Dihydrocarvone 1Aerial partsEOs[40]60Dihydrocarvone 2Aerial partsEOs[40]61DodecamethylcyclohexasiloxaneAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether[23, 43]62EucalyptolLeavesEOs[42]63EugenolAerial parts, whole plantEOs[19, 44]64FenchoneFlowering topEOs[16]65Geraniol formateAerial partsEthyl acetate[23]66Geranyl linaloolAerial partsEOs[40]67Germacrene-D-4-olFlowering topEOs[41]68GermacreneAerial partsEOs[15]69Guaia-3,9-dieneAerial partsPetroleum ether, EOs[23, 43, 48]70GuaiazuleneAerial partsEOs[40]71HexahydroindanAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether[23, 43]72HotrienolLeavesEOs[42]73Isoaromadendrene epoxideAerial partsPetroleum ether, EOs[23, 40]74IsoborneolAerial partsEOs[40]75Isobornyl acetateAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether[23, 43]76Isobornyl formateAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[23, 44]77IsoledeneLeavesEOs[42]78Isothymol methyl etherLeavesEOs[42]79LedeneAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether[23, 43]80Ledol 6-epi-cubenolFlowering topEOs[41]81LimoneneAerial parts, flowering topEOs[15, 41]82LinaloolAerial parts, flowering topEOs[41, 45]83Linalyl propionateAerial partsEthyl acetate, petroleum ether[23]84Thymol methyl etherAerial parts, flowering topEOs[40, 41]85MyrceneAerial parts, flowering topEOs[15, 41]86Octan-3-oneAerial partsEOs[45]87Octen-3-olAerial partsEOs[40]88p-Cymen-8-ol (2-(4-methylphenyl) propan-2-ol)Flowering topEOs[41]89p-CymeneAerial parts, flowering topEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[23, 41, 45]90PentasiloxaneAerial partsPetroleum ether[23]91PinocarveolAerial partsEOs[40]92p-Menth-2-en-1-olAerial partsEOs[40]p-Mentha-1.8-dieneAerial partsPetroleum ether, ethyl acetate[23]93SabineneAerial partsEOs[49]94Santolina trieneAerial partsEO, petroleum ether[23, 43]95SpathulenolAerial partsEOs[40]96tau-CadinolAerial parts, whole plantEOs[19, 44]97Terpinen-4-olAerial parts, whole plantEOs[19, 44]98TerpinoleneAerial partsEOs[40]99Thuja-2,4(10)-dieneAerial partsEOs[40]100ThujoneAerial parts, whole plantEOs[19, 44]101ThymolAerial parts, flowering topEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[23, 41, 42]102Trans-1,2-diphenylcyclobutaneAerial partsPetroleum ether[23]103trans-PinocarveolFlowering topEOs[41]104trans-Sabinene hydrateFlowering topEOs[41]105TricycleneAerial parts, whole plant, flowering topEOs[19, 41, 46]106ValenceneAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether[23, 43]107α-AmorpheneLeavesEOs[42]108α-CadinolAerial partsEOs[21]109α-CampholenalAerial partsEOs[44]110α-Campholene aldehydeAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether[23, 43]111α-CubebeneAerial partsEOs[40]112α-CurcumeneAerial partsEOs[44]113α-FeruleneAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether[23, 43]114α-GuajeneAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether[23, 43]115α-GurjuneneAerial partsEOs[44]116α-HumuleneAerial parts, flowering topEOs[15, 41]α-MuuroleneAerial partsPetroleum ether[23]117α-PanasisenAerial partsEOs[40]118α-PentasiloxaneAerial partsEOs[43]119α-PhellandreneAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether[23, 43]120α-PineneAerial parts, whole plantEOs[19, 46]121α-TerpineolAerial partsEOs[50]122α-ThujeneAerial parts, whole plant, flowering topEOs[19, 41, 46]123β-BourboneneFlowering topEOs[41]124β-CaryophylleneAerial partsEOs[47]125β-CubebeneAerial partsEOs[40]126β-GurjuneneAerial partsEOs[40]127β-IononeAerial partsEOs[40]128β-LinaloolAerial partsEthyl acetate[23]129β-OplopenoneAerial parts, whole plantEOs[19, 44]130β-PatchouleneAerial partsEOs[40]131β-PhellandreneFlowering top, aerial partsEOs[41, 48]132β-PineneAerial parts, flowering topEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[16, 23, 41]133γ-CadineneAerial parts, flowering topEOs[41, 47]134γ-CostolAerial partsEOs[48]135γ-MethyliononeAerial partsEOs[48]136γ-MuuroleneAerial parts, flowering topEOs[41, 42]137τ-MuurololAerial partsPetroleum ether[23]138γ-TerpineneAerial partsEOs, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate[15, 23, 50]139δ-CadineneAerial parts, flowering topEOs[41, 50]


### 3.3.1. Phenolic Compounds

Thanks to their phenolic group, the phenolic compounds such as phenolic acids, flavonoids, tocopherols, and tannins are considered as an important group of bioactive compounds that are responsible for a wide range of biological properties such as antimicrobial [51, 52], antioxidant [53] anticancer [54], and litholytic activities [55]. Besides their pharmacological potential, the phenolic compounds, particularly flavonoids, are involved in many physiological processes; they are included in the regulation and protection of vascular plants against several biotic and abiotic stresses [56–58].There are few studies investigating the chemical composition ofT. satureioides extracts. In fact, the phenolic profile of T. satureioides remains not well identified.Khouya et al. [24] have examined the phenolic composition of the T. satureioides aqueous extracts and reported that they contain high levels of phenolic compounds, which are represented by rosmarinic acid as major phenolic acid and luteolin-7-glycoside and hesperetin as major flavonoids. Another study showed that T. satureioides aqueous extracts were rich in total polyphenols (456.73 ± 6.94 mg caffeic acid equivalent/g of dry plant) and in flavonoid group (172.79 ± 2.12 mg rutin equivalent/g of dry plant) with rosmarinic acid, hesperetin, and luteolin-7-glucoside as major phenolic compounds [13].In a recent study, Tebaa et al. [59] showed that the aqueous extracts of T. satureioides aerial parts are rich in total polyphenols (285 ± 34.82 μg gallic acid equivalent/mL aqueous extract), in total flavonoids (25.83 ± 4 μg catechin equivalent/mL aqueous extract) and in total tannins (0.032 ± 0.002 μg tannic acid equivalents/mL aqueous extract).In addition, the chemical composition of the methanol extracts ofT. satureioides analyzed by a combination of chromatographic tools (reverse-phase HPLC and 1H NMR analyses) revealed the presence of flavonoids as the main constituents with five essential compounds: luteolin-3′-O-glucuronide, luteolin-7-O-glucoside, eriodictyol-7-O-glucoside, aglycone luteolin, and thymonin [14]. However, other molecules such as ursolic acid and oleanolic acids were identified in the chloroform extract of T. satureioides [14].The qualitative phytochemical analysis ofT. satureioides extracts (hydromethanol, chloroform, ethyl acetate, and butanol extracts) enabled to detect the presence of flavonoids, catechols, gallic tannins, and anthraquinones [60]. Moreover, the quantitative HPLC analysis of crude and organic extracts of T. satureioides aerial parts showed the presence of phenolic acids (caffeic acid and rosmarinic acid) and the flavonoids quercetin and hesperetin in crud and methanolic extracts, whereas rosmarinic acid, hyperoside, quercetin, and hesperetin were detected in ethyl acetate extracts [39].Interestingly, Kouar et al. [38] have determined the phytochemical profile of alcoholic extract of T. satureioides leaves, using the electrocoagulation and solvent extraction assays, and detected the presence of saponins, sterols, triterpene, tannins, and flavone aglycones. The quantitative analysis showed that T. satureioides alcoholic extract contains high levels of total polyphenols (70.2 ± 0.4 mg of gallic acid equivalents/g extract) and total flavonoids (52.7 ± 0.01 mg of quercetin equivalents/g extract). The high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis allowed to identify six compounds in this alcoholic extract, including four phenolic acids (12–14, 16) and two flavonoid compounds (1–2) [39].The phenolic compound content and nature vary depending on the extraction solvent, plant’s part used, plant’s origin, storage conditions, and analytical method used. Indeed, flavonoids are the main phenolic group detected inT. satureioides extracts with 11 compounds (1–11) (Figure 2). Moreover, five phenolic acids were identified (12–16) (Figure 3).Figure 2
Flavonoid compounds isolated fromT. satureioides extracts.Figure 3
Phenolic acids identified inT. satureioides.


### 3.3.2. Volatile Compounds

Numerous studies have investigated and characterized the chemical composition ofT. satureioides EOs, particularly from the aerial parts.The chemical analysis showed thatT. satureioides EOs are mainly composed of borneol, thymol, carvacrol, camphene, α-pinene, α-terpineol, p-cymene, and linalool (Figure 4).Figure 4
Chemical structure of the main terpenoids identified inT. satureioides.The percentages and the nature of these volatile compounds vary noticeably depending on several intrinsic and extrinsic factors of the plant, including geographical origin, phenological stage, genotype, plant’s part used, and storage and extraction conditions [61, 62].Sbayou et al. [43] indicated that borneol and thymol are the chief components of T. satureioides EOs with 26.45% and 11.24%, respectively, followed by α-terpinyl acetate (10.99%), β-caryophyllene (8.24%), and camphene (7.16%). The studies carried out on T. satureioides from the High Atlas of Morocco indicated that carvacrol (26.5%) and borneol (20.1%) are the main compounds of its EOs, while thymol was not identified [15, 49].It is well seen that borneol, carvacrol, and thymol constitute the major proportion of the volatile compounds ofT. satureioides. Indeed, in an earlier study, Jaafari et al. [23] described the EOs of T. satureioides harvested in Tiznit region as a “borneol chemotype (59.37%),” those of Marrakech region (Asni-My Brahim) as “carvacrol (35.90%) and borneol (30%) chemotypes,” and the one of Beni Mellal region (Bin El Widane) as “borneol (51.98%) and thymol (26.81%) chemotypes,” thus showing a variation in chemotypes of the T. satureioides EOs according to harvest zones.A comparative study ofT. satureioides leaf and flower EOs, using simultaneous GC-FID and GC-MS tools, showed major differences regarding the main compounds of these two plants’ part EOs. Thereby, borneol (a monoterpene alcohol) was the main compound of the flowers EOs with 19.3%, followed by carvacrol (10.0%) and thymol (3.8%), while carvacrol (37%), thymol (13.7%), γ-terpinene (8.4%), and (E)-β-caryophyllene (6.6%) were the main components of the leaves EOs [41].Another study revealed the presence of 68 volatile compounds representing 93.3% ofT. satureioides aerial parts’ total EOs using capillary gas chromatography and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS) [40]. These volatile compounds mainly belong to the monoterpenoides class (monoterpene hydrocarbons, oxygenated monoterpenes, and phenolic monoterpenes) such as borneol, carvacrol, thymol, camphene, linalool, and camphor.


## 3.3.1. Phenolic Compounds

Thanks to their phenolic group, the phenolic compounds such as phenolic acids, flavonoids, tocopherols, and tannins are considered as an important group of bioactive compounds that are responsible for a wide range of biological properties such as antimicrobial [51, 52], antioxidant [53] anticancer [54], and litholytic activities [55]. Besides their pharmacological potential, the phenolic compounds, particularly flavonoids, are involved in many physiological processes; they are included in the regulation and protection of vascular plants against several biotic and abiotic stresses [56–58].There are few studies investigating the chemical composition ofT. satureioides extracts. In fact, the phenolic profile of T. satureioides remains not well identified.Khouya et al. [24] have examined the phenolic composition of the T. satureioides aqueous extracts and reported that they contain high levels of phenolic compounds, which are represented by rosmarinic acid as major phenolic acid and luteolin-7-glycoside and hesperetin as major flavonoids. Another study showed that T. satureioides aqueous extracts were rich in total polyphenols (456.73 ± 6.94 mg caffeic acid equivalent/g of dry plant) and in flavonoid group (172.79 ± 2.12 mg rutin equivalent/g of dry plant) with rosmarinic acid, hesperetin, and luteolin-7-glucoside as major phenolic compounds [13].In a recent study, Tebaa et al. [59] showed that the aqueous extracts of T. satureioides aerial parts are rich in total polyphenols (285 ± 34.82 μg gallic acid equivalent/mL aqueous extract), in total flavonoids (25.83 ± 4 μg catechin equivalent/mL aqueous extract) and in total tannins (0.032 ± 0.002 μg tannic acid equivalents/mL aqueous extract).In addition, the chemical composition of the methanol extracts ofT. satureioides analyzed by a combination of chromatographic tools (reverse-phase HPLC and 1H NMR analyses) revealed the presence of flavonoids as the main constituents with five essential compounds: luteolin-3′-O-glucuronide, luteolin-7-O-glucoside, eriodictyol-7-O-glucoside, aglycone luteolin, and thymonin [14]. However, other molecules such as ursolic acid and oleanolic acids were identified in the chloroform extract of T. satureioides [14].The qualitative phytochemical analysis ofT. satureioides extracts (hydromethanol, chloroform, ethyl acetate, and butanol extracts) enabled to detect the presence of flavonoids, catechols, gallic tannins, and anthraquinones [60]. Moreover, the quantitative HPLC analysis of crude and organic extracts of T. satureioides aerial parts showed the presence of phenolic acids (caffeic acid and rosmarinic acid) and the flavonoids quercetin and hesperetin in crud and methanolic extracts, whereas rosmarinic acid, hyperoside, quercetin, and hesperetin were detected in ethyl acetate extracts [39].Interestingly, Kouar et al. [38] have determined the phytochemical profile of alcoholic extract of T. satureioides leaves, using the electrocoagulation and solvent extraction assays, and detected the presence of saponins, sterols, triterpene, tannins, and flavone aglycones. The quantitative analysis showed that T. satureioides alcoholic extract contains high levels of total polyphenols (70.2 ± 0.4 mg of gallic acid equivalents/g extract) and total flavonoids (52.7 ± 0.01 mg of quercetin equivalents/g extract). The high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis allowed to identify six compounds in this alcoholic extract, including four phenolic acids (12–14, 16) and two flavonoid compounds (1–2) [39].The phenolic compound content and nature vary depending on the extraction solvent, plant’s part used, plant’s origin, storage conditions, and analytical method used. Indeed, flavonoids are the main phenolic group detected inT. satureioides extracts with 11 compounds (1–11) (Figure 2). Moreover, five phenolic acids were identified (12–16) (Figure 3).Figure 2
Flavonoid compounds isolated fromT. satureioides extracts.Figure 3
Phenolic acids identified inT. satureioides.


## 3.3.2. Volatile Compounds

Numerous studies have investigated and characterized the chemical composition ofT. satureioides EOs, particularly from the aerial parts.The chemical analysis showed thatT. satureioides EOs are mainly composed of borneol, thymol, carvacrol, camphene, α-pinene, α-terpineol, p-cymene, and linalool (Figure 4).Figure 4
Chemical structure of the main terpenoids identified inT. satureioides.The percentages and the nature of these volatile compounds vary noticeably depending on several intrinsic and extrinsic factors of the plant, including geographical origin, phenological stage, genotype, plant’s part used, and storage and extraction conditions [61, 62].Sbayou et al. [43] indicated that borneol and thymol are the chief components of T. satureioides EOs with 26.45% and 11.24%, respectively, followed by α-terpinyl acetate (10.99%), β-caryophyllene (8.24%), and camphene (7.16%). The studies carried out on T. satureioides from the High Atlas of Morocco indicated that carvacrol (26.5%) and borneol (20.1%) are the main compounds of its EOs, while thymol was not identified [15, 49].It is well seen that borneol, carvacrol, and thymol constitute the major proportion of the volatile compounds ofT. satureioides. Indeed, in an earlier study, Jaafari et al. [23] described the EOs of T. satureioides harvested in Tiznit region as a “borneol chemotype (59.37%),” those of Marrakech region (Asni-My Brahim) as “carvacrol (35.90%) and borneol (30%) chemotypes,” and the one of Beni Mellal region (Bin El Widane) as “borneol (51.98%) and thymol (26.81%) chemotypes,” thus showing a variation in chemotypes of the T. satureioides EOs according to harvest zones.A comparative study ofT. satureioides leaf and flower EOs, using simultaneous GC-FID and GC-MS tools, showed major differences regarding the main compounds of these two plants’ part EOs. Thereby, borneol (a monoterpene alcohol) was the main compound of the flowers EOs with 19.3%, followed by carvacrol (10.0%) and thymol (3.8%), while carvacrol (37%), thymol (13.7%), γ-terpinene (8.4%), and (E)-β-caryophyllene (6.6%) were the main components of the leaves EOs [41].Another study revealed the presence of 68 volatile compounds representing 93.3% ofT. satureioides aerial parts’ total EOs using capillary gas chromatography and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS) [40]. These volatile compounds mainly belong to the monoterpenoides class (monoterpene hydrocarbons, oxygenated monoterpenes, and phenolic monoterpenes) such as borneol, carvacrol, thymol, camphene, linalool, and camphor.


## 3.4.  Pharmacological Properties

Numerous pharmacological investigations have shown thatT. satureioides essential oils and extracts obtained from different plant parts possess various biological activities, including antibacterial, antioxidant, antifungal, antiparasitic, anticancer, antidiabetic, and anti-inflammatory effects (Figure 5).Figure 5
Pharmacological properties ofT. satureioides.


### 3.4.1. Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial activity ofT. satureioides EOs and extracts, against a panel of bacterial strains, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, was reported in the literature [16, 63, 64].Indeed, the EOs obtained from different parts ofT. satureioides were evaluated against several pathogenic bacteria known by their drug multiresistance, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Table 3 summarizes the published works that investigated the antibacterial activities of T. satureioides. It lists the parts used, the tested extracts, the methods used, the tested strains, and the main results obtained.Table 3
Antibacterial activity ofT. satureioides.
Parts usedExtractsMethods usedBacteria testedKey resultsReferencesAerial partsEssential oil (0.93%)Broth microdilution methodStaphylococcus aureus CCMM B3MIC = 4.50 mg/mL[65]Micrococcus luteus ATCC 10240MIC = 4.50 mg/mLBacillus cereus ATCC 14579MIC = 2.50 mg/mLListeria monocytogenes ATCC 19115MIC = 4.50 mg/mLEscherichia coli ATCC 25922MIC = 18.00 mg/mLPseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853MIC > 18.4 mg/mLKlebsiella pneumoniaeMIC = 9 mg/mLStemAqueous extractPaper disc diffusion assayClavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis H195 isolateФ = 23.3 ± 2.4 mm[66]LeavesAqueous extractPaper disc diffusion assayClavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis H195 isolateФ = 16.4 ± 0.5 mm[66]Aerial partEssential oilAgar disc diffusion methodStaphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213Ф = 34.67 ± 0.33 mm[20]Escherichia coli ATCC 25922Ф = 20.67 ± 0.27 mmPseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853Ф = 7.00 ± 0.00 mmAerial partEssential oilMicrodilution assayEscherichia coli ATCC 25922MIC = 0.125%[67]Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853MIC = 1%Micrococcus luteus ATCC 14452MIC = 0.03%Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213MIC = 0.03%Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633MIC = 0.03%Salmonella typhimuriumMIC = 0.25%Bacillus cereusMIC = 0.015%Whole plantEssential oil (1.78%)Microdilution assayStaphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923MIC = 2.5μl/mL[17]Streptococcus fasciens ATCC 29212)MIC = 2.5μl/mLEscherichia coli ATCC 4157MIC = 5μl/mLPseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853MIC = 10μl/mLAerial partEssential oilAgar diffusion methodBroth microdilution methodEscherichia coli ATCC 25921Ф = 15 ± 0 mmMIC = 0.625 μl/mLMBC = 0.625 μl/mL[43]Escherichia coliФ = 21 ± 0 mmMIC = 125 μl/mLMBC = 125 μl/mLPseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853Ф = 0 ± 0 mmMIC > 20 μl/mLMBC > 20 μl/mLPseudomonas aeruginosaФ = 0 ± 0 mmMIC > 20 μl/mLMBC > 20 μl/mLEnterobacter cloacaeФ = 15.5 ± 0.7 mmMIC = 0.625 μl/mLMBC = 0.625 μl/mLStaphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213Ф = 23 ± 0 mmMIC = 0.312 μl/mLMBC = 0.312 μl/mLStaphylococcus aureusФ = 15 ± 0 mmMIC = 0.625 μl/mLMBC = 0.625 μl/mLEnterococcus faeciumФ = 16 ± 0 mmMIC = 125 μl/mLMBC = 125 μl/mLAerial partEssential oilAgar-dilution methodEnterobacter cloacae (clinical strain, nosoco.tech Abdel1)MIC = 2.9μg/mL[68]Escherichia coli CIP 54127MIC = 2.9μg/mLKlebsiella pneumoniae CIP 104216MIC = 2.9μg/mLP. aeruginosa ATCC 15442MIC = 11.7μg/mLSalmonella typhimurium ATCC 133115MIC = 2.9μg/mLListeria monocytogenes ATCC 35152MIC = 5.8μg/mLMethicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus (MRSA)MIC = 2.9μg/mLEnterococcus faecalis CIP A185MIC = 5.8μg/mLStreptococcus equinus CIP 56.23MIC = 2.9μg/mLStreptococcus pyogenes CIP 70.3MIC = 2.9μg/mLAerial partsEssential oilAgar diffusion methodBroth microdilution methodEscherichia coli ATCC25922Ф = 12.3 ± 0.6 mmMIC = 1.5%[40]Non-O1Vibrio choleraФ = 33.3 ± 2.9 mmMIC = 0.5%Pseudomonas aeruginosa CCMMB11Ф = 11.7 ± 1.5 mmMIC = 1.5%Enterobacter cloacaeФ = 11.7 ± 0.6 mmMIC = 1.5%Klebsiella pneumoniaeФ = 13.3 ± 0.6 mmMIC = 1.5%Staphylococcus aureus CCMMB3Ф = 29.3 ± 2.1 mmMIC = 0.125%Bacillus subtilis ATCC9524Ф = 34.3 ± 1.1 mmMIC = 0.003%Bacillus cereus ATCC14579Ф = 30 ± 0 mmMIC = 0.003%Aerial partsEssential oil (1.86%)Agar disc diffusionAgar dilution techniqueStaphylococcus aureus CCMM B3Ф = 29.67 ± 1.15 mmMIC = 1.78 mg/mL[15]Bacillus subtilis ATCC 9524Ф = 43.67 ± 1.53 mmMIC = 0.89 mg/mLBacillus cereus ATCC 14579Ф = 43.67 ± 1.53 mmMIC = 0.89 mg/mLMicrococcus luteus ATCC 10240Ф = 42.00 ± 1.73 mmMIC = 0.45 mg/mLEscherichia coli ATCC 25922Ф = 22.5 ± 1.32 mmMIC = 1.78 mg/mLEscherichia coli CCMM B4Ф = 23.00 ± 1.00 mmMIC = 1.78 mg/mLSalmonella sp. CCMM B17Ф = 22.33 ± 0.58 mmMIC = 1.78 mg/mLEnterobacter cloacaeФ = 21.00 ± 1.00 mmMIC = 1.78 mg/mLLeavesEssential oil (2.95%(v/w))Agar diffusion assayBacillus cereusФ = 12.5 mmMIC = 80 μg/mL[41]Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 5638Ф = 8.0 mmMIC = 640 μg/mLListeria monocytogenesФ = 14.5 mmMIC = 40 μg/mLAeromonas hydrophilaФ = 11.8 mmMIC = 160 μg/mLEscherichia coliФ = 9.0 mmMIC = 320 μg/mLProteus vulgarisФ = 7.4 mmMIC = 640 μg/mLPseudomonas aeruginosaNDMIC = 1280 μg/mLPseudomonas fluorescensФ = 7.2 mmMIC = 640 μg/mLSalmonella abonyФ = 7.8 mmMIC = 640 μg/mLInflorescences (flowers)Essential oil (2.95% (v/))Bacillus cereusФ = 13.8 mmMIC = 80 μg/mL[41]Staphylococcus aureus ATCC5638Ф = 8.4 mmMIC = 320 μg/mLListeria monocytogenesФ = 15.2 mmMIC = 40 μg/mLAeromonas hydrophilaФ = 14.2 mm; MIC = 80μg/mLEscherichia coliФ = 10.4 mmMIC = 160 μg/mLProteus vulgarisФ = 8.2 mmMIC = 320 μg/mLPseudomonas aeruginosaФ = 6.8 mmMIC = 640 μg/mLPseudomonas fluorescensФ = 8.0 mmMIC = 320 μg/mLSalmonella abonyФ = 8.6 mmMIC = 320 μg/mLAerial partEthanolic extractAgar-well diffusion methodBroth microdilution methodStaphylococcus aureus 25923Ф = 6 mmMIC = 6.25 mg/mLMBC = 12.5 mg/mL[69]Listeria monocytogenes 4032Ф = 8.1 ± 0.31 mmMIC = 6.25 mg/mLMBC = 12.5 mg/mLBacillus cereus ATCC 14579Ф = 13.2 ± 0.23 mmMIC = <0.5 mg/mLMBC = 1 mg/mLEscherichia coli ATCC 25929Ф = 6 mmMIC = 25 mg/mLMBC = 50 mg/mLPseudomonas aeruginosa 195Ф = 10 ± 0.043 mmMIC = 25 mg/mLMBC = 50 mg/mLSalmonella entericaФ = 6 mmMIC = 12 mg/mLMBC = 25 mg/mLAerial partEssential oilDisc diffusion assayEscherichia coliФ = 13.66 ± 0.43 mm[70]Bacillus subtilisФ = 26.21 ± 2.08 mmMycobacterium smegmatisФ = 28.34 ± 1.05 mmLeavesEssential oil (2.7%)Disc diffusion assayEscherichia coliФ = 15.5 mm[71]Staphylococcus aureusФ = 30.7 mmAcinetobacter baumanniiФ = 19 mmBacillus cereusФ = 16 mmEnterobacter cloacaeФ = 20 mmFlowerEssential oil (4.1%)Disc diffusion assayEscherichia coliФ = 20 mm[71]Staphylococcus aureusФ = 45 mmAcinetobacter baumanniiФ = 35 mmBacillus cereusФ = 38 mmEnterobacter cloacaeФ = 22 mmWhole plantEssential oilAgar diffusion methodMicrodilution methodStaphylococcus aureusФ = 16 mmMIC = 1.1% (v/v)[18]Bacillus cereusФ = 19 mmMIC = 1.1% (v/v)Escherichia coliФ = 14.25 mmMIC = 1.25% (v/v)Flowering plantEssential oilAgar dilution methodEscherichia coli O157:H7High antibacterial effect against the four pathogenic bacteria (MIC 0.05–0.4% (v/v))[72]Listeria monocytogenes 2812 1/2aSalmonella typhimurium SL 1344Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213Flowering topEssential oilAgar diffusion methodPseudomonas aeruginosa IHФ = 8 mm[73]Pseudomonas aeruginosa CECT 110TФ = 8 mmPseudomonas aeruginosa CECT 118Ф = 8 mmPseudomonas Fluorescens CECT 378Ф = 11 mmEscherichia coli k12Ф = 13 mmStaphylococcus aureus MBLAФ = 16 mmStaphylococcus aureus CECT 976Ф = 15 mmStaphylococcus aureus CECT 794Ф = 15 mmBacillus subtilis DCM 6633Ф = 19 mmBacillus capsulasФ = 18 mmEnterococcus faecium CECT 410Ф = 13 mmListeria innocua CECT 4030Ф = 21 mmListeria monocytogenes CECT 4032Ф = 19 mmAerial partEssential oil (3.2%)Microdilution assayEscherichia coli 1 from patientMIC = 0.33 mg/mL[64]Escherichia coli ATCCSMIC = 43 mg/mLEscherichia coli 2 from patientMIC = 0.36 mg/mLEscherichia coli 1 from raw sheep milkMIC = 0.51 mg/mLEscherichia coli 2 from Raw Sheep MilkMIC = 0.34 mg/mLEscherichia coli 3 from raw sheep milkMIC = 0.4 mg/mLEnterohemorragicEscherichia coli (EHEC) O157MIC = 0.21 mg/mLEnteropathogenicEscherichia coli (EPEC)MIC = 0.31 mg/mLEnterotoxigenicEscherichia coli (ETEC)MIC = 0.45 mg/mLEnteroaggregativeEscherichia coli (EAggEC)MIC = 0.5 mg/mLEnteroinvasiveEscherichia coliMIC = 0.7 mg/mLLeavesEssential oil 1.35% (v/w)Disc diffusion methodMicrobacterium testaceumHigh antibacterial effect (Ф > 20 mm)MIC = 0.025% (v/v)MBC = 0.033% (v/v)[63]Serratia marcescensImportant antibacterial activity (15 < Ф < 19 mm)MIC = 0.033% (v/v)MBC = 0.05% (v/v)LeavesAqueous extract 100 mg/mL (w/v)Disc diffusion methodMicrobacterium testaceumSlight antibacterial activity (Ф < 8 mm)[63]Serratia marcescensSlight antibacterial activity (Ф < 8 mm)Aerial partsEssential oilMicrodilution methodMycobacterium aurum A+MIC = 0.015% (v/v)MBC = 0.015% (v/v)[16]Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2-155MIC = 0.062% (v/v)MBC = 0.062% (v/v)Ou-Yahia et al. [67] assessed the antibacterial effect of the T. satureioides aerial part EOs against E. coli, Bacillus cereus, P. aeruginosa, Salmonella typhimurium, S. aureus, Micrococcus luteus, and Bacillus subtilis and showed a variable antibacterial activity of the tested EOs. The highest activity was observed against B. cereus and S. aureus with MIC values of 0.015% and 0.03%, respectively, while P. aeruginosa was the most resistant bacterium with a MIC value of 1%.In another study, testing of the bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects of EOs ofT. satureioides leaves and flowering top on E. coli, S. aureus, A. baumannii, B. cereus, and Enterobacter cloacae revealed a significant antibacterial activity (inhibition zone diameters (Ф): 16 mm < Ф < 30.7 mm for leaves EOs; 22 mm < Ф < 45 mm for flowering top EOs) and a bacteriostatic effect against all tested strains except B. cereus [71].Mekkaoui et al. [70] tested in vitro the antimicrobial effect of EOs of T. satureioides harvested at two different phenological stages (flowering and postflowering) against three pathogenic bacteria responsible for foodborne disease in Morocco (E. coli, B. subtilis, and Mycobacterium smegmatis). They showed that EOs obtained after the flowering stage were more active against the studied strains than those obtained in the flowering stage. In fact, the highest activity was shown against M. smegmatis followed by B. subtilis, while the weakest activity was noticed against E. coli [70]. In the same context, Oussalah et al. [72] evaluated the antibacterial potential of the T. satureioides flower EOs against four pathogenic bacteria including two Gram-positive bacteria: S. aureus and Listeria monocytogenes (2812 1/2a), and two Gram-negative bacteria: E. coli O157:H7 and S. typhimurium (SL 1344), using the broth microdilution method. The results indicated that S. aureus was the most sensitive bacterium with MIC = 0.05% (v/v) followed by E. coli O157:H7 and S. typhimurium (MIC = 0.2% (v/v)), while L. monocytogenes was the least sensitive bacteria to the tested EOs with MIC = 0.4% (v/v).More interestingly, Amrouche et al. [18] investigated both in vitro and in a food system the antibacterial activity of T. satureioides EOs, extracted from the whole plant, against foodborne bacteria (E. coli, S. aureus, and B. cereus). The paper disc diffusion and broth microdilution methods were used for the in vitro test and the beef minced meat was used as food model. Thereby, the addition of T. satureioides EOs to inoculated beef minced meat decreased the tested strain population after 4 days of storage. Moreover, in vitro investigations indicated that B. cereus was the most sensitive bacteria (Ф = 19 mm and MIC = 1.1%), followed by S. aureus (Ф = 16 mm, MIC = 1.1%) and then E. coli (Ф = 14.25 mm, MIC = 1.25%) [18].El Abdouni Khayari et al. [65] reported a good antibacterial activity of the T. satureioides aerial part EOs against B. cereus (Ф = 30.00 ± 0.50 mm, MIC = 2.25 mg/mL), followed by M. luteus (Ф = 26.70 ± 0.20 mm, MIC = 4.5 mg/mL), L. monocytogenes (Ф = 19.30 ± 0.60 mm, MIC = 4.5 mg/mL), S. aureus (Ф = 16.30 ± 2.10 mm, MIC = 4.5 mg/mL), K. pneumoniae (Ф = 19.00 ± 1.00 mm, MIC = 9 mg/mL), and E. coli (Ф = 11.70 ± 0.60 mm, MIC = 18 mg/mL), compared to standards: cefixime, gentamicin, and kanamycin, while no effect was observed against P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) [65].Another work demonstrated an antibacterial effect of EOs extracted from wild and cultivatedT. satureioides against Gram-positive (S. aureus, M. luteus, B. subtilis, and B. cereus) higher than against Gram-negative strains (E. coli (ATCC 25922), E. coli (CCMM B4), Salmonella sp., and E. cloacae) [15]. The highest activity was found for M. luteus (Ф = 49.17 ± 1.15 mm for wild TS, Ф = 29.67 ± 1.15 mm for cultivated TS), while the weakest activity was noticed against S. aureus (Ф = 30.33 ± 0.58 mm for wild TS, Ф = 47.83 ± 1.32 mm for cultivated TS). Moreover, a considerable activity was also noted against Gram-negative bacteria with inhibition zone diameters ranging from 19.00 ± 0.10 to 23.00 ± 1.00 mm. The microdilution approach revealed a promising antibacterial effect of the tested EOs with MIC values ranging from 0.45 to 1.78 μg/mL [15]. This remarkable antibacterial effect of the T. satureioides EOs is concordant with the results of an earlier investigation, which indicated that T. satureioides E.Os inhibit the growth of a panel of microorganisms (65 Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains), among which Aeromonas hydrophila, Vibrio cholera, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were the most sensitive bacteria with respective MIC values of 0.14 ± 0.4% (v/v), 0.14 ± 0.0% (v/v), and 0.16 ± 0.0% (v/v) [74].Recently, Meziani et al. [63] studied the antimicrobial effect of EOs and aqueous and methanolic extract from thyme leaves against Microbacterium testaceum and Serratia marcescens endophytic to date palm by using different approaches including quantitative and qualitative methods. They demonstrated that the EOs were more active against both reported bacteria than aqueous and methanolic extracts (Фs < 15 mm). Thus, these EOs have a great inhibition power against M. testaceum (Ф > 20 mm, MIC = 0.025%, MBC = 0.033%) and a good effect against S. marcescens (15 mm < Ф < 19 mm, MIC = 0.033%, MBC = 0.05%) [63].


### 3.4.2. Antioxidant Activity

The use ofT. satureioides as a food preservative and against several pathologic disorders in Moroccan folk medicine encouraged the research teams to study the antioxidant potential of this plant species. In fact, several works reported the antioxidant activity of T. satureioides EOs as well as its extracts obtained from different plant parts (aerial parts, flowering top, and leaves) using different methods such as 2,2′-azino-bis 3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS) radical scavenging, ferric reducing power, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), 2,2-azobis 2-amidinopropane dihydrochloride (APPH), and β-carotene/linoleic acid bleaching assays [13, 21, 39, 75]. All published works that studied the antioxidant activity of T. satureioides EOs and extracts have been listed and summarized in Table 4.Table 4
Antioxidant effects ofT. satureioides.
Parts usedExtractsMethods usedFindingsReferenceAerial partsCrude extractDPPH free radical scavenging activity assayIC50 = 0.44 ± 0.06 mg/mL[39]FRAP assayIC50 = 41.41 ± 4.55 mmol/LEthyl acetate extractDPPH assayIC50 = 0.33 ± 0.02 mg/mLFRAP assayIC50 = 82.69 ± 2.29 mmol/LMethanolic extractDPPH assayIC50 = 0.71 ± 0.09 mg/mLFRAP assayIC50 = 55.99 ± 2.21 mmol/LAqueous extractDPPH assayIC50 = 0.85 ± 0.06 mg/mLFRAP assayIC50 = 25.46 ± 2.71 mmol/LDichloromethane extractDPPH assayIC50 = 0.48 ± 0.05 mg/mLFRAP assayIC50 = 33.48 ± 0.08 mmol/LAerial partsAqueous extractTBARS methodSignificant inhibition of lipid peroxidation product (MDA)[24]DPPH assayIC50 = 0.44 ± 0.01 mg/mLFRAP assayIC50 = 40.14 ± 4.55 mmol/gAerial partsAqueous extractABTS assayIC50 = 14.65 ± 0.36 μg/mL[76]Aerial partEssential oil (1.86%)DPPH assayIC50 = 167.00 ± 2.47 μg/mL[15]Reducing power techniqueIC50 = 176.89 ± 1.02 μg/mLAerial partsEssential oil (2%)DPPH assayIC50 = 0.21 ± 1.17 mg/mL[49]Reducing power assayIC50 = 0.23 ± 0.67 mg/mLβ-Carotene/linoleic acid bleaching assayIC50 = 0.21 ± 1.74 mg/mLABTS assayIC50 = 0.15 ± 0.36 mg/mLFlowering topEssential oilReducing power assayAbsorbance = 0.507 ± 0.019[73]DPPH assayPercent inhibition = 42.99%β-Carotene testPercent inhibition = 74.50%Aerial partEthyl acetate extractDPPH assayIC50 = 109.98 ± 3 μg/mL[60]Aerial partEssential oilReducing power assayPercent inhibition = 24.64 ± 0.03%[47]TEAC assayTEAC = 159.00 ± 0.01 mMof Trolox/mβ-Carotene bleaching assayPercent inhibition = 83.87 ± 0.10%DFRS assayPercent inhibition = 68.55 ± 0.01%Aerial partEssential oilFerric reducing capacityEC50 = 177.13 ± 2.1 mg/mL[46]DPPH assayIC50 = 122.53 ± 2.38 μg/mLLeavesMethanolic extractFree radical scavenging activity (DPPH° test)SC50 = 14.6 μg[14]Aerial partsEssential oilDPPH assayIC50 = 0.25 ± 0.03 mg/mL[43]β-Carotene/linoleic acid assayPercent inhibition = 81.78 ± 0.37%TBARS assayI50= 300.32 ± 1.50 mg/mLAerial partAqueous extractFRAP assayIC50 = 50.79 ± 2.02 mmol Trolox/g[13]Malondialdehyde (MDA) assayImportant antioxidant activityDPPH assayIC50 = 0.480 ± 0.010 mg/mLAAPH-induced oxidative erythrocyte hemolysis assayNeutralization of the free radicals liberated by the AAPHAerial partEssential oilReducing powerIC50 = 85.47 ± 0.95 μg/mL[21]β-Carotene/linoleic acid assayIC50 = 64.26 ± 0.70 μg/mLDPPHIC50 = 108.15 ± 1.54 μg/mLAerial partEssential oilDPPH assayIC50 = 0.81 mg/mL[44]Aerial partHot water extractDPPH assayIC50 = 15.99 ± 0.47 μg/mL[77]Reducing power assayIC50 = 20.33 ± 0.19 μg/mLβ-Carotene bleachingIC50 = 14.69 ± 0.69 μg/mLCold water extractDPPH assayIC50 = 53.42 ± 1.17 μg/mLReducing power assayIC50 = 64.32 ± 0.52 μg/mLβ-Carotene bleachingIC50 = 50.20 ± 0.33 μg/mLMethanol extractDPPH assayIC50 = 30.24 ± 0.19 μg/mLReducing power assayIC50 = 30.48 ± 0.52 μg/mLβ-Carotene bleaching testIC50 = 86.38 ± 0.85 μg/mLAerial partHexane extractDPPH assayIC50 = 275.71 ± 11.26 μg/mL[22]ABTS assayIC50 = 127.38 ± 3.83 μg/mLFRAP assay97.819 ± 0.377 mg equivalent ascorbic acid/g of extractDichloromethane extractDPPH assayIC50 = 8.18 ± 0.07 μg/mLABTS assayIC50 = 80.09 ± 0.65 μg/mLFRAP assay153.457 ± 0.247 mg equivalent ascorbic acid/g of extractEthyl acetate extractDPPH assayIC50 = 23.75 ± 0.67 μg/mLABTS assayIC50 = 85.16 ± 3.22 μg/mLFRAP assay123.004 ± 0.377 mg equivalent ascorbic acid/g of extractWater-ethanol extractDPPH assayIC50 = 3.86 ± 0.07 μg/mLABTS assayIC50 = 51.27 ± 0.82 μg/mLFRAP assay233.292 ± 0.377 mg equivalent ascorbic acid/g of extractLeavesHot aqueous extractDPPH assayIC50 = 0.343 ± 0.011 mg/mL[69]Iron-ferrous chelating power assayIC50 = 0.4539 ± 0.011 mg/mLCold aqueous extractDPPH assayIC50 = 0.652 ± 0.013 mg/mLIron-ferrous chelating power assayIC50 = 0.6394 ± 0.014 mg/mLEthanolic extractDPPH assayIC50 = 0.247 ± 0.011 mg/mLIron-ferrous chelating power assayIC50 = 0.3341 ± 0.012 mg/mLLeavesMethanolic extractDPPH assayPercent inhibition = 92.24%[75]Sbayou et al. [43] reported an important antioxidant activity of the EOs of T. satureioides aerial parts using different methods, namely, DPPH free radical scavenging, TBARS, and β-carotene/linoleic acid assays. In fact, the tested EOs exhibit a strong reduction of DPPH radical (IC50 = 0.25 ± 0.03 mg/mL) compared with ascorbic acid (IC50 = 0.25 ± 0.03 mg/mL) as standard antioxidant. However, the β-carotene/linoleic acid assay showed a moderate antioxidant capacity (I% = 81.78 ± 0.37%) compared to BHT (I% = 98.13 ± 0.94%) as positive control. Taoufik et al. [44] also investigated the antiradical capacity of the T. satureioides aerial part EOs using the DPPH scavenging test and reported an interesting antioxidant effect in a concentration-dependent manner. The IC50DPPH (IC50 = 0.81 mg/mL) value was slightly lower than the antioxidant standards BHT (IC50 = 0.11 mg/mL) and Covi-oxT (IC50 = 0.11 mg/mL).Another study assessed the antioxidant activity ofT. satureioides EOs using several in vitro assays, including ABTS, DPPH, β-carotene/linoleic acid bleaching, and reducing power assays, with quercetin and BHT as antioxidant standards [49]. The antiradical activity indicated that T. satureioides EOs exhibit stronger activity against free radical ABTS (IC50 = 0.15 ± 0.36 μg/mL) and DPPH (IC50 = 0.21 ± 1.17 μg/mL) than the used antioxidant standards. Moreover, β-carotene test and reducing power assays also showed high antioxidant activities with respective IC50 values of 0.21 ± 1.74 μg/mL and 0.23 ± 0.67 μg/mL [49]. In contrast, an investigation carried out by Alaoui-Jamali et al. [46] indicated that the T. satureioides aerial part EOs exhibit a moderate scavenging activity of DPPH radical (IC50 = 122.53 ± 2.38 μg/mL). The ferric (Fe3+) reducing capacity assay showed similar results with an EC50 value equal to 177.13 ± 2.1 μg/mL.In addition, the antioxidant capacity ofT. satureioides extracts was also studied by many researchers. Khouya and his coworkers [39] tested the antioxidant effect of ethyl acetate, methanolic, aqueous, dichloromethane, and crude extracts of T. satureioides aerial parts using DPPH radical scavenging, FRAP, and APPH assays and showed a higher reductive potential of these extracts than the reference compounds (Trolox). In fact, the highest reducing power of ferric metal was shown by the ethyl acetate fraction (IC50 = 82.69 ± 2.29 mmol Trolox/g of dry extract), and the lowest was observed for the aqueous fraction (IC50 = 25.46 ± 2.71 mmol Trolox/g of dry extract). The radical scavenging activity indicated that ethyl acetate fraction exerted the highest antioxidant activity with an IC50 value of 0.33 ± 0.02 mg/mL, followed by crude extract (IC50 = 0.44 ± 0.06 mg/mL), dichloromethane fraction (IC50 = 0.48 ± 0.05 mg/mL), and then methanolic fraction (IC50 = 0.71 ± 0.09 mg/mL). However, the aqueous fraction showed the weakest antiradical capacity (IC50 = 0.85 ± 0.06 mg/mL) [39]. Furthermore, the APPH test indicated that the addition of the tested extracts to suspensions containing erythrocyte and 2,2′-azobis 2-amidinopropane dihydrochloride (APPH) induced an increase in the hemolysis half times [39].The antioxidant activities ofT. satureioides extracts obtained from the aerial part were also examined by Labiad et al. [22] who reported remarkable antioxidant activities for hexane, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, and hydro-ethanolic extracts, using ABTS radical scavenging, DPPH, and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) methods, with ascorbic acid as positive control. The hydro-ethanolic extracts exhibited the highest antiradical effect against DPPH and ABTS radicals with IC50 values of 3.86 ± 0.07 μg/mL and 51.27 ± 0.82 μg/mL, respectively, followed by dichloromethane (IC50DPPH = 23.75 ± 0.67 μg/mL, IC50ABTS = 80.09 ± 0.65 μg/mL), ethyl acetate (IC50DPPH = 23.75 ± 0.67 μg/mL, IC50ABTS = 85.16 ± 3.22 μg/mL), and then hexane extracts (IC50DPPH = 275.71 ± 11.26 μg/mL, IC50ABTS = 127.38 ± 3.83 μg/mL). Moreover, the hydro-ethanolic extract also exerted a great FRAP activity (233.292 ± 0.377 mg equivalent Ascorbic acid/g of extract). However, the hexane extract showed the lowest FRAP capacity (97.819 ± 0.377 mg equivalent ascorbic acid/g of extract) [22].In a recent study, Hmidani et al. [76] measured the capacity of aqueous extract of T. satureioides to scavenge the generated radical ABTS+•, using ABTS assay, and showed significant scavenging activity of this extract (IC50ABTS = 14.65 ± 0.36 μg/ml) compared to ascorbic acid as standard (IC50 = 1.96 ± 0.1 μg/ml). These findings support those obtained by Khouya et al. [24], which showed a considerable antioxidant activity of the T. satureioides aerial part aqueous extract. Indeed, the tested aqueous extracts displayed potent scavenging activity against DPPH radical with an IC50 value equal to 0.44 ± 0.01 mg/mL TAE and a higher reducing power of ferric complex (40.14 ± 4.55 mmol Trolox/gTAE) than the Trolox used as positive control (44.33 ± 7.55 mmol Trolox/gTAE). Moreover, the aqueous extracts of T. satureioides exerted a potent protective potential against hemolysis of erythrocytes according to APPH test results [24]. These considerable antioxidant effects of the aqueous extracts were attributed to their high phenolic content [24].


### 3.4.3. Antifungal Activity

The antifungal activity ofT. satureioides, especially its essential oils against several pathogenic fungal, has been reported in the literature [19, 50, 78, 79].Boukhira et al. [20] evaluated the antifungal activity of T. satureioides EOs obtained from aerial parts against a yeast, Candida albicans (ATCC-10231), and a mould Aspergillus brasiliensis (ATCC-16404), using radial growth inhibition and broth microdilution assays. This study showed that the studied EOs exert effective effect against C. albicans (Ф = 24.67 ± 0.67 mm, MIC = 0.6 μl/mL) and A. brasiliensis (MIC = 1.3 μl/mL).Asdadi et al. [19] studied the anticandidal activity of T. satureioides EOs (10 μl) against nosocomial fluconazole-resistant strains (Candida dubliniensis, C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. krusei) using disc diffusion and microdilution methods, with fluconazole (10 μl) and amphotericin B (10 μl) as positive controls. According to this study, C. dubliniensis was the most sensitive strain to the tested EOs (Ф = 85 mm), followed by C. krusei (Ф = 67 mm), while C. albicans and C. glabrata were the least sensitive fungal strains with Ф of 53 mm and 49 mm, respectively. The microdilution assays showed an interesting anticandidal effect with minimal fungicidal concentration (MFC) values ranging between 0.3300 mg/mL and 0.9062 mg/ml [19].In addition, El Bouzidi et al. [15] assessed the anticandidal activity of T. satureioides EOs obtained from aerial parts against four candida species, including C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and C. krusei using disc diffusion and microdilution assays, and fluconazol (40 μl) as reference. The findings of this study showed that all tested strains were more sensitive to the tested EOs (37.67 ± 1.53 mm < Ф < 42.00 ± 1.00 mm) than to the synthetic fungicide (fluconazol) used as a positive control (26.50 ± 0.50 mm < Ф < 29.83 ± 1.15 mm).More interestingly, Salhi et al. [50] reported the antifungal activity of four chemotypes of T. satureioides EOs from aerial parts, namely, borneol/α-terpineol, borneol/carvacrol/α-terpineol, borneol/carvacrol/thymol, and borneol/camphene/α-terpineol against fungal strains responsible of wood damages (Coniophora puteana BAM Ebw. 15, Gloeophyllum trabeum BAM Ebw.109, Oligoporus placenta FPRL. 280, and Trametes versicolor CTB 863). The studied samples were harvested from four different locations in Southwest Morocco (Oulad Berhil, Amskroud-East, Aoulouz, and Timoulay Aksri), and qualitative and quantitative assays were used for antifungal screening [50]. The results showed that, at a concentration of 1/500 (v/v), all tested chemotypes inhibit the growth of the tested wood-decaying fungi. However, the investigated chemotypes exhibited a variable degree of the antifungal effect. Therefore, the chemotype borneol/carvacrol/thymol was the most active against the tested strains, followed by borneol/camphene/α-terpineol, borneol/α-terpineol, and borneol/carvacrol/α-terpineol. Moreover, the highest antifungal activity was noticed against G. trabeum with MIC ranging between 1/1500 v/v and 1/500 (v/v), followed by C. puteana (1/1250 (v/v) <MIC< 1/500 (v/v)), T. versicolor (MIC = 1/500 (v/v)), and O. placenta (MIC = 1/500 (v/v)) [50].In the same context, Rahmouni et al. [42] reported fungicide effect of T. satureioides EOs and their major components (thymol, α-terpineol, carvacrol, and borneol) against a phytopathogenic fungus responsible for fusarium wilt on date palm in Morocco, named Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Albedinis. The results of this study showed that these EOs as well as their major compounds inhibited noticeably the mycelia growth of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Albedinis in a concentration-dependent manner. The maximal fungicidal effect of the studied compounds was noticed by thymol with a minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) value of 03.08 μl/mL, followed by α-terpineol (MFC = 12.20 μl/mL), carvacrol (MFC = 16.96 μl/mL), and borneol (MFC = 22.73 μl/mL) [42]. Furthermore, T. satureioides EO was found to inhibit spore germination of phytopathogenic fungi of citrus, namely, Penicillium digitatum, P. italicum, and Galactomyces citriaurantii at concentrations greater than 500 μl/mL [79].Recently, El-Bakkal et al. [21] tested the antifungal effect of the EOs of T. satureioides aerial parts against Botrytis cinerea, P. digitatum, and Verticillium dahliae using disc diffusion method and fluconazol (40 μg/disc) as standard antifungal drug. Their results showed a promising antifungal effect, of the studied EOs, against the three tested strains, with inhibition zone diameters ranging from 31.50 ± 1.32 mm to 36.27 ± 1.15 mm compared to fluconazol (25.50 ± 0.50 < Ф < 28.00 ± 0.50).


### 3.4.4. Anti-Inflammatory Activity

Inflammation is a complex biological process that maintains homeostasis of the organism in response to multiple injuries such as infection, trauma, or immune reaction. It is characterized by pain, heat, redness, and swelling [80].Inflammation is related to the occurrence of several human pathologies, including heart diseases, Alzheimer’s disease, and cancer [81–83]. The mechanisms of the anti-inflammatory response involve various mediators such as phospholipase A2 activation, cytokines, chemokines, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, macrophages and mast cells, platelet-activating factor, and nitric oxide (NO) [83].Khouya et al. [39] have evaluated in vivo the anti-inflammatory activity of T. satureioides crude extracts and fractions (dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, methanol, and aqueous) using croton-oil-induced ear oedema and carrageenan-induced paw oedema in mice and rats. The results of this study showed that topical applications of the dichloromethane and ethyl acetate fractions (1 mg/ear) reduced significantly ear oedema volume of 31.60% and 27.16%, respectively, after 4 h of treatment. The crude extracts exhibited the greatest activity, and its tropical application decreased significantly ear oedema (29.67%) 8 h after treatment. However, the methanol and aqueous fractions did not decrease ear oedema. Moreover, the results of carrageenan oedema assay showed that the ethyl acetate and methanol fractions (60 mg/kg) reduced significantly oedema induced by carrageenan during the first phase (16.40 ± 0.33% and 14.51 ± 1.40%, respectively) [39]. This study confirmed results obtained by the same authors, indicating that aqueous extracts of T. satureioides exhibited a remarkable anti-inflammatory effect in carrageenan-induced rats paw edema and in croton oil-induced mice ear edema [24]. In another previous study, Ismaili et al. [14] investigated the in vivo topical anti-inflammatory effect of methanol and chloroform extracts of T. satureioides leaves, using the croton oil ear test in mice, and showed that chloroform extract induced significant edema inhibition (at a inhibition dose ID50 of 282 μg·cm−2), only three times lower than that of the standard conventional drug indomethacin used as positive control (ID50 = 93 μg·cm−2), while the methanolic extract did not show any topical anti-inflammatory activity.


### 3.4.5. Antiparasitic Effect

T. satureioides EOs from different plant parts were studied against a number of human, virus, and plant parasites. Indeed, Pavela [84] assessed the toxicity of T. satureioides EOs against the larvae of Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae) and showed its effective larvicidal property with respective lethal concentrations (IC50 and IC90) of 44 μg/ml and 81.5 μg/ml.Kasrati et al. [49] reported a considerable insecticidal activity of T. satureioides EOs against adults of pest Tribolium castaneum responsible for stored-product deterioration (lethal dose values of LD50 = 0.315 μl/cm2 and LD90 = 0.71 μl/cm2). Moreover, Santana et al. [25] examined the toxicity of T. satureioides EOs against insect pest’s larvae of Spodoptera littoralis, insect adults of Myzus persicae and Rhopalosiphum padi, as well as against adults and eggs of root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne javanica. A strong antifeedant effect of T. satureioides EOs was observed against S. littoralis larvae (EC50 = 36.9 ± 22.7 μg/cm2), M. persicae adults (EC50 = 53.53 ± 6.5 μg/cm2), and R. padi (EC50 = 49.0 ± 6.6 μg/cm2). Additionally, an important nematicidal effect was noticed against the tested M. javanica at two different development stages: second-stage juveniles (J2) (LC50 = 0.1 mg/mL and LC90 = 0.2 mg/mL) and eggs (mortality rate of 38.9% after 7 days) [25].Another study conducted by Avato et al. [26] showed that T. satureioides EOs exhibit a promising nematicidal activity against Meloidogyne incognita juveniles (mortality rate of 10.6 ± 0.7%) and adults of Pratylenchus vulnus (100 ± 0.0%) and Xiphinema index (14.9 ± 0.7%) and that, after 48 h, this effect was dose-dependent.The acaricidal activity ofT. satureioides EOs was also reported in the literature. Ramzi et al. [85] studied the effect of the EOs of T. satureioides aerial parts against adults of Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae) and indicated an interesting mortality rate of 50% after 24 h and 80% after 48 h. Additionally, T. satureioides EO was shown to destroy completely the wheat pest Sitophilus oryzae (coleopters) at a concentration of 2.4 × 10−2 μl/cm3 after 24 h [86].


### 3.4.6. Other Pharmacological Properties

T. satureioides was also reported to exhibit other pharmacological properties such as anticancer, antidiabetic, and hypolipidemic effects.Jaafari et al. [23] evaluated the in vitro antitumor activity of T. satureioides EOs collected in different regions (High Atlas of Morocco, Bin Elwidane-Beni Mellal, and Tiznit) on P815 mastocytoma cell line using the 3-(4,5-di-methylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. The results showed that all tested EOs exhibit an important cytotoxic effect against P815 cell line with IC50 values from 0.225% (v/v) to 0.24% (v/v). The antiproliferative effect of T. satureioides crude extracts was studied against MCF-7 breast cancer cell line using MTT assay and showed their strong inhibition with a half-inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of 37.5 ± 4.02 μg/mL [24].Kabbaoui et al. [2] investigated the antidiabetic effect of T. satureioides aqueous extracts obtained from the aerial parts on streptozotocin- (STZ-) induced diabetic rats via the administration of an oral concentration of 500 mg/kg. As a result, T. satureioides aqueous extracts decreased significantly blood glucose levels and improved body weight and glucose tolerance in STZ-diabetic rats.


## 3.4.1. Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial activity ofT. satureioides EOs and extracts, against a panel of bacterial strains, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, was reported in the literature [16, 63, 64].Indeed, the EOs obtained from different parts ofT. satureioides were evaluated against several pathogenic bacteria known by their drug multiresistance, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Table 3 summarizes the published works that investigated the antibacterial activities of T. satureioides. It lists the parts used, the tested extracts, the methods used, the tested strains, and the main results obtained.Table 3
Antibacterial activity ofT. satureioides.
Parts usedExtractsMethods usedBacteria testedKey resultsReferencesAerial partsEssential oil (0.93%)Broth microdilution methodStaphylococcus aureus CCMM B3MIC = 4.50 mg/mL[65]Micrococcus luteus ATCC 10240MIC = 4.50 mg/mLBacillus cereus ATCC 14579MIC = 2.50 mg/mLListeria monocytogenes ATCC 19115MIC = 4.50 mg/mLEscherichia coli ATCC 25922MIC = 18.00 mg/mLPseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853MIC > 18.4 mg/mLKlebsiella pneumoniaeMIC = 9 mg/mLStemAqueous extractPaper disc diffusion assayClavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis H195 isolateФ = 23.3 ± 2.4 mm[66]LeavesAqueous extractPaper disc diffusion assayClavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis H195 isolateФ = 16.4 ± 0.5 mm[66]Aerial partEssential oilAgar disc diffusion methodStaphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213Ф = 34.67 ± 0.33 mm[20]Escherichia coli ATCC 25922Ф = 20.67 ± 0.27 mmPseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853Ф = 7.00 ± 0.00 mmAerial partEssential oilMicrodilution assayEscherichia coli ATCC 25922MIC = 0.125%[67]Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853MIC = 1%Micrococcus luteus ATCC 14452MIC = 0.03%Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213MIC = 0.03%Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633MIC = 0.03%Salmonella typhimuriumMIC = 0.25%Bacillus cereusMIC = 0.015%Whole plantEssential oil (1.78%)Microdilution assayStaphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923MIC = 2.5μl/mL[17]Streptococcus fasciens ATCC 29212)MIC = 2.5μl/mLEscherichia coli ATCC 4157MIC = 5μl/mLPseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853MIC = 10μl/mLAerial partEssential oilAgar diffusion methodBroth microdilution methodEscherichia coli ATCC 25921Ф = 15 ± 0 mmMIC = 0.625 μl/mLMBC = 0.625 μl/mL[43]Escherichia coliФ = 21 ± 0 mmMIC = 125 μl/mLMBC = 125 μl/mLPseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853Ф = 0 ± 0 mmMIC > 20 μl/mLMBC > 20 μl/mLPseudomonas aeruginosaФ = 0 ± 0 mmMIC > 20 μl/mLMBC > 20 μl/mLEnterobacter cloacaeФ = 15.5 ± 0.7 mmMIC = 0.625 μl/mLMBC = 0.625 μl/mLStaphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213Ф = 23 ± 0 mmMIC = 0.312 μl/mLMBC = 0.312 μl/mLStaphylococcus aureusФ = 15 ± 0 mmMIC = 0.625 μl/mLMBC = 0.625 μl/mLEnterococcus faeciumФ = 16 ± 0 mmMIC = 125 μl/mLMBC = 125 μl/mLAerial partEssential oilAgar-dilution methodEnterobacter cloacae (clinical strain, nosoco.tech Abdel1)MIC = 2.9μg/mL[68]Escherichia coli CIP 54127MIC = 2.9μg/mLKlebsiella pneumoniae CIP 104216MIC = 2.9μg/mLP. aeruginosa ATCC 15442MIC = 11.7μg/mLSalmonella typhimurium ATCC 133115MIC = 2.9μg/mLListeria monocytogenes ATCC 35152MIC = 5.8μg/mLMethicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus (MRSA)MIC = 2.9μg/mLEnterococcus faecalis CIP A185MIC = 5.8μg/mLStreptococcus equinus CIP 56.23MIC = 2.9μg/mLStreptococcus pyogenes CIP 70.3MIC = 2.9μg/mLAerial partsEssential oilAgar diffusion methodBroth microdilution methodEscherichia coli ATCC25922Ф = 12.3 ± 0.6 mmMIC = 1.5%[40]Non-O1Vibrio choleraФ = 33.3 ± 2.9 mmMIC = 0.5%Pseudomonas aeruginosa CCMMB11Ф = 11.7 ± 1.5 mmMIC = 1.5%Enterobacter cloacaeФ = 11.7 ± 0.6 mmMIC = 1.5%Klebsiella pneumoniaeФ = 13.3 ± 0.6 mmMIC = 1.5%Staphylococcus aureus CCMMB3Ф = 29.3 ± 2.1 mmMIC = 0.125%Bacillus subtilis ATCC9524Ф = 34.3 ± 1.1 mmMIC = 0.003%Bacillus cereus ATCC14579Ф = 30 ± 0 mmMIC = 0.003%Aerial partsEssential oil (1.86%)Agar disc diffusionAgar dilution techniqueStaphylococcus aureus CCMM B3Ф = 29.67 ± 1.15 mmMIC = 1.78 mg/mL[15]Bacillus subtilis ATCC 9524Ф = 43.67 ± 1.53 mmMIC = 0.89 mg/mLBacillus cereus ATCC 14579Ф = 43.67 ± 1.53 mmMIC = 0.89 mg/mLMicrococcus luteus ATCC 10240Ф = 42.00 ± 1.73 mmMIC = 0.45 mg/mLEscherichia coli ATCC 25922Ф = 22.5 ± 1.32 mmMIC = 1.78 mg/mLEscherichia coli CCMM B4Ф = 23.00 ± 1.00 mmMIC = 1.78 mg/mLSalmonella sp. CCMM B17Ф = 22.33 ± 0.58 mmMIC = 1.78 mg/mLEnterobacter cloacaeФ = 21.00 ± 1.00 mmMIC = 1.78 mg/mLLeavesEssential oil (2.95%(v/w))Agar diffusion assayBacillus cereusФ = 12.5 mmMIC = 80 μg/mL[41]Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 5638Ф = 8.0 mmMIC = 640 μg/mLListeria monocytogenesФ = 14.5 mmMIC = 40 μg/mLAeromonas hydrophilaФ = 11.8 mmMIC = 160 μg/mLEscherichia coliФ = 9.0 mmMIC = 320 μg/mLProteus vulgarisФ = 7.4 mmMIC = 640 μg/mLPseudomonas aeruginosaNDMIC = 1280 μg/mLPseudomonas fluorescensФ = 7.2 mmMIC = 640 μg/mLSalmonella abonyФ = 7.8 mmMIC = 640 μg/mLInflorescences (flowers)Essential oil (2.95% (v/))Bacillus cereusФ = 13.8 mmMIC = 80 μg/mL[41]Staphylococcus aureus ATCC5638Ф = 8.4 mmMIC = 320 μg/mLListeria monocytogenesФ = 15.2 mmMIC = 40 μg/mLAeromonas hydrophilaФ = 14.2 mm; MIC = 80μg/mLEscherichia coliФ = 10.4 mmMIC = 160 μg/mLProteus vulgarisФ = 8.2 mmMIC = 320 μg/mLPseudomonas aeruginosaФ = 6.8 mmMIC = 640 μg/mLPseudomonas fluorescensФ = 8.0 mmMIC = 320 μg/mLSalmonella abonyФ = 8.6 mmMIC = 320 μg/mLAerial partEthanolic extractAgar-well diffusion methodBroth microdilution methodStaphylococcus aureus 25923Ф = 6 mmMIC = 6.25 mg/mLMBC = 12.5 mg/mL[69]Listeria monocytogenes 4032Ф = 8.1 ± 0.31 mmMIC = 6.25 mg/mLMBC = 12.5 mg/mLBacillus cereus ATCC 14579Ф = 13.2 ± 0.23 mmMIC = <0.5 mg/mLMBC = 1 mg/mLEscherichia coli ATCC 25929Ф = 6 mmMIC = 25 mg/mLMBC = 50 mg/mLPseudomonas aeruginosa 195Ф = 10 ± 0.043 mmMIC = 25 mg/mLMBC = 50 mg/mLSalmonella entericaФ = 6 mmMIC = 12 mg/mLMBC = 25 mg/mLAerial partEssential oilDisc diffusion assayEscherichia coliФ = 13.66 ± 0.43 mm[70]Bacillus subtilisФ = 26.21 ± 2.08 mmMycobacterium smegmatisФ = 28.34 ± 1.05 mmLeavesEssential oil (2.7%)Disc diffusion assayEscherichia coliФ = 15.5 mm[71]Staphylococcus aureusФ = 30.7 mmAcinetobacter baumanniiФ = 19 mmBacillus cereusФ = 16 mmEnterobacter cloacaeФ = 20 mmFlowerEssential oil (4.1%)Disc diffusion assayEscherichia coliФ = 20 mm[71]Staphylococcus aureusФ = 45 mmAcinetobacter baumanniiФ = 35 mmBacillus cereusФ = 38 mmEnterobacter cloacaeФ = 22 mmWhole plantEssential oilAgar diffusion methodMicrodilution methodStaphylococcus aureusФ = 16 mmMIC = 1.1% (v/v)[18]Bacillus cereusФ = 19 mmMIC = 1.1% (v/v)Escherichia coliФ = 14.25 mmMIC = 1.25% (v/v)Flowering plantEssential oilAgar dilution methodEscherichia coli O157:H7High antibacterial effect against the four pathogenic bacteria (MIC 0.05–0.4% (v/v))[72]Listeria monocytogenes 2812 1/2aSalmonella typhimurium SL 1344Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213Flowering topEssential oilAgar diffusion methodPseudomonas aeruginosa IHФ = 8 mm[73]Pseudomonas aeruginosa CECT 110TФ = 8 mmPseudomonas aeruginosa CECT 118Ф = 8 mmPseudomonas Fluorescens CECT 378Ф = 11 mmEscherichia coli k12Ф = 13 mmStaphylococcus aureus MBLAФ = 16 mmStaphylococcus aureus CECT 976Ф = 15 mmStaphylococcus aureus CECT 794Ф = 15 mmBacillus subtilis DCM 6633Ф = 19 mmBacillus capsulasФ = 18 mmEnterococcus faecium CECT 410Ф = 13 mmListeria innocua CECT 4030Ф = 21 mmListeria monocytogenes CECT 4032Ф = 19 mmAerial partEssential oil (3.2%)Microdilution assayEscherichia coli 1 from patientMIC = 0.33 mg/mL[64]Escherichia coli ATCCSMIC = 43 mg/mLEscherichia coli 2 from patientMIC = 0.36 mg/mLEscherichia coli 1 from raw sheep milkMIC = 0.51 mg/mLEscherichia coli 2 from Raw Sheep MilkMIC = 0.34 mg/mLEscherichia coli 3 from raw sheep milkMIC = 0.4 mg/mLEnterohemorragicEscherichia coli (EHEC) O157MIC = 0.21 mg/mLEnteropathogenicEscherichia coli (EPEC)MIC = 0.31 mg/mLEnterotoxigenicEscherichia coli (ETEC)MIC = 0.45 mg/mLEnteroaggregativeEscherichia coli (EAggEC)MIC = 0.5 mg/mLEnteroinvasiveEscherichia coliMIC = 0.7 mg/mLLeavesEssential oil 1.35% (v/w)Disc diffusion methodMicrobacterium testaceumHigh antibacterial effect (Ф > 20 mm)MIC = 0.025% (v/v)MBC = 0.033% (v/v)[63]Serratia marcescensImportant antibacterial activity (15 < Ф < 19 mm)MIC = 0.033% (v/v)MBC = 0.05% (v/v)LeavesAqueous extract 100 mg/mL (w/v)Disc diffusion methodMicrobacterium testaceumSlight antibacterial activity (Ф < 8 mm)[63]Serratia marcescensSlight antibacterial activity (Ф < 8 mm)Aerial partsEssential oilMicrodilution methodMycobacterium aurum A+MIC = 0.015% (v/v)MBC = 0.015% (v/v)[16]Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2-155MIC = 0.062% (v/v)MBC = 0.062% (v/v)Ou-Yahia et al. [67] assessed the antibacterial effect of the T. satureioides aerial part EOs against E. coli, Bacillus cereus, P. aeruginosa, Salmonella typhimurium, S. aureus, Micrococcus luteus, and Bacillus subtilis and showed a variable antibacterial activity of the tested EOs. The highest activity was observed against B. cereus and S. aureus with MIC values of 0.015% and 0.03%, respectively, while P. aeruginosa was the most resistant bacterium with a MIC value of 1%.In another study, testing of the bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects of EOs ofT. satureioides leaves and flowering top on E. coli, S. aureus, A. baumannii, B. cereus, and Enterobacter cloacae revealed a significant antibacterial activity (inhibition zone diameters (Ф): 16 mm < Ф < 30.7 mm for leaves EOs; 22 mm < Ф < 45 mm for flowering top EOs) and a bacteriostatic effect against all tested strains except B. cereus [71].Mekkaoui et al. [70] tested in vitro the antimicrobial effect of EOs of T. satureioides harvested at two different phenological stages (flowering and postflowering) against three pathogenic bacteria responsible for foodborne disease in Morocco (E. coli, B. subtilis, and Mycobacterium smegmatis). They showed that EOs obtained after the flowering stage were more active against the studied strains than those obtained in the flowering stage. In fact, the highest activity was shown against M. smegmatis followed by B. subtilis, while the weakest activity was noticed against E. coli [70]. In the same context, Oussalah et al. [72] evaluated the antibacterial potential of the T. satureioides flower EOs against four pathogenic bacteria including two Gram-positive bacteria: S. aureus and Listeria monocytogenes (2812 1/2a), and two Gram-negative bacteria: E. coli O157:H7 and S. typhimurium (SL 1344), using the broth microdilution method. The results indicated that S. aureus was the most sensitive bacterium with MIC = 0.05% (v/v) followed by E. coli O157:H7 and S. typhimurium (MIC = 0.2% (v/v)), while L. monocytogenes was the least sensitive bacteria to the tested EOs with MIC = 0.4% (v/v).More interestingly, Amrouche et al. [18] investigated both in vitro and in a food system the antibacterial activity of T. satureioides EOs, extracted from the whole plant, against foodborne bacteria (E. coli, S. aureus, and B. cereus). The paper disc diffusion and broth microdilution methods were used for the in vitro test and the beef minced meat was used as food model. Thereby, the addition of T. satureioides EOs to inoculated beef minced meat decreased the tested strain population after 4 days of storage. Moreover, in vitro investigations indicated that B. cereus was the most sensitive bacteria (Ф = 19 mm and MIC = 1.1%), followed by S. aureus (Ф = 16 mm, MIC = 1.1%) and then E. coli (Ф = 14.25 mm, MIC = 1.25%) [18].El Abdouni Khayari et al. [65] reported a good antibacterial activity of the T. satureioides aerial part EOs against B. cereus (Ф = 30.00 ± 0.50 mm, MIC = 2.25 mg/mL), followed by M. luteus (Ф = 26.70 ± 0.20 mm, MIC = 4.5 mg/mL), L. monocytogenes (Ф = 19.30 ± 0.60 mm, MIC = 4.5 mg/mL), S. aureus (Ф = 16.30 ± 2.10 mm, MIC = 4.5 mg/mL), K. pneumoniae (Ф = 19.00 ± 1.00 mm, MIC = 9 mg/mL), and E. coli (Ф = 11.70 ± 0.60 mm, MIC = 18 mg/mL), compared to standards: cefixime, gentamicin, and kanamycin, while no effect was observed against P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) [65].Another work demonstrated an antibacterial effect of EOs extracted from wild and cultivatedT. satureioides against Gram-positive (S. aureus, M. luteus, B. subtilis, and B. cereus) higher than against Gram-negative strains (E. coli (ATCC 25922), E. coli (CCMM B4), Salmonella sp., and E. cloacae) [15]. The highest activity was found for M. luteus (Ф = 49.17 ± 1.15 mm for wild TS, Ф = 29.67 ± 1.15 mm for cultivated TS), while the weakest activity was noticed against S. aureus (Ф = 30.33 ± 0.58 mm for wild TS, Ф = 47.83 ± 1.32 mm for cultivated TS). Moreover, a considerable activity was also noted against Gram-negative bacteria with inhibition zone diameters ranging from 19.00 ± 0.10 to 23.00 ± 1.00 mm. The microdilution approach revealed a promising antibacterial effect of the tested EOs with MIC values ranging from 0.45 to 1.78 μg/mL [15]. This remarkable antibacterial effect of the T. satureioides EOs is concordant with the results of an earlier investigation, which indicated that T. satureioides E.Os inhibit the growth of a panel of microorganisms (65 Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains), among which Aeromonas hydrophila, Vibrio cholera, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were the most sensitive bacteria with respective MIC values of 0.14 ± 0.4% (v/v), 0.14 ± 0.0% (v/v), and 0.16 ± 0.0% (v/v) [74].Recently, Meziani et al. [63] studied the antimicrobial effect of EOs and aqueous and methanolic extract from thyme leaves against Microbacterium testaceum and Serratia marcescens endophytic to date palm by using different approaches including quantitative and qualitative methods. They demonstrated that the EOs were more active against both reported bacteria than aqueous and methanolic extracts (Фs < 15 mm). Thus, these EOs have a great inhibition power against M. testaceum (Ф > 20 mm, MIC = 0.025%, MBC = 0.033%) and a good effect against S. marcescens (15 mm < Ф < 19 mm, MIC = 0.033%, MBC = 0.05%) [63].


## 3.4.2. Antioxidant Activity

The use ofT. satureioides as a food preservative and against several pathologic disorders in Moroccan folk medicine encouraged the research teams to study the antioxidant potential of this plant species. In fact, several works reported the antioxidant activity of T. satureioides EOs as well as its extracts obtained from different plant parts (aerial parts, flowering top, and leaves) using different methods such as 2,2′-azino-bis 3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS) radical scavenging, ferric reducing power, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), 2,2-azobis 2-amidinopropane dihydrochloride (APPH), and β-carotene/linoleic acid bleaching assays [13, 21, 39, 75]. All published works that studied the antioxidant activity of T. satureioides EOs and extracts have been listed and summarized in Table 4.Table 4
Antioxidant effects ofT. satureioides.
Parts usedExtractsMethods usedFindingsReferenceAerial partsCrude extractDPPH free radical scavenging activity assayIC50 = 0.44 ± 0.06 mg/mL[39]FRAP assayIC50 = 41.41 ± 4.55 mmol/LEthyl acetate extractDPPH assayIC50 = 0.33 ± 0.02 mg/mLFRAP assayIC50 = 82.69 ± 2.29 mmol/LMethanolic extractDPPH assayIC50 = 0.71 ± 0.09 mg/mLFRAP assayIC50 = 55.99 ± 2.21 mmol/LAqueous extractDPPH assayIC50 = 0.85 ± 0.06 mg/mLFRAP assayIC50 = 25.46 ± 2.71 mmol/LDichloromethane extractDPPH assayIC50 = 0.48 ± 0.05 mg/mLFRAP assayIC50 = 33.48 ± 0.08 mmol/LAerial partsAqueous extractTBARS methodSignificant inhibition of lipid peroxidation product (MDA)[24]DPPH assayIC50 = 0.44 ± 0.01 mg/mLFRAP assayIC50 = 40.14 ± 4.55 mmol/gAerial partsAqueous extractABTS assayIC50 = 14.65 ± 0.36 μg/mL[76]Aerial partEssential oil (1.86%)DPPH assayIC50 = 167.00 ± 2.47 μg/mL[15]Reducing power techniqueIC50 = 176.89 ± 1.02 μg/mLAerial partsEssential oil (2%)DPPH assayIC50 = 0.21 ± 1.17 mg/mL[49]Reducing power assayIC50 = 0.23 ± 0.67 mg/mLβ-Carotene/linoleic acid bleaching assayIC50 = 0.21 ± 1.74 mg/mLABTS assayIC50 = 0.15 ± 0.36 mg/mLFlowering topEssential oilReducing power assayAbsorbance = 0.507 ± 0.019[73]DPPH assayPercent inhibition = 42.99%β-Carotene testPercent inhibition = 74.50%Aerial partEthyl acetate extractDPPH assayIC50 = 109.98 ± 3 μg/mL[60]Aerial partEssential oilReducing power assayPercent inhibition = 24.64 ± 0.03%[47]TEAC assayTEAC = 159.00 ± 0.01 mMof Trolox/mβ-Carotene bleaching assayPercent inhibition = 83.87 ± 0.10%DFRS assayPercent inhibition = 68.55 ± 0.01%Aerial partEssential oilFerric reducing capacityEC50 = 177.13 ± 2.1 mg/mL[46]DPPH assayIC50 = 122.53 ± 2.38 μg/mLLeavesMethanolic extractFree radical scavenging activity (DPPH° test)SC50 = 14.6 μg[14]Aerial partsEssential oilDPPH assayIC50 = 0.25 ± 0.03 mg/mL[43]β-Carotene/linoleic acid assayPercent inhibition = 81.78 ± 0.37%TBARS assayI50= 300.32 ± 1.50 mg/mLAerial partAqueous extractFRAP assayIC50 = 50.79 ± 2.02 mmol Trolox/g[13]Malondialdehyde (MDA) assayImportant antioxidant activityDPPH assayIC50 = 0.480 ± 0.010 mg/mLAAPH-induced oxidative erythrocyte hemolysis assayNeutralization of the free radicals liberated by the AAPHAerial partEssential oilReducing powerIC50 = 85.47 ± 0.95 μg/mL[21]β-Carotene/linoleic acid assayIC50 = 64.26 ± 0.70 μg/mLDPPHIC50 = 108.15 ± 1.54 μg/mLAerial partEssential oilDPPH assayIC50 = 0.81 mg/mL[44]Aerial partHot water extractDPPH assayIC50 = 15.99 ± 0.47 μg/mL[77]Reducing power assayIC50 = 20.33 ± 0.19 μg/mLβ-Carotene bleachingIC50 = 14.69 ± 0.69 μg/mLCold water extractDPPH assayIC50 = 53.42 ± 1.17 μg/mLReducing power assayIC50 = 64.32 ± 0.52 μg/mLβ-Carotene bleachingIC50 = 50.20 ± 0.33 μg/mLMethanol extractDPPH assayIC50 = 30.24 ± 0.19 μg/mLReducing power assayIC50 = 30.48 ± 0.52 μg/mLβ-Carotene bleaching testIC50 = 86.38 ± 0.85 μg/mLAerial partHexane extractDPPH assayIC50 = 275.71 ± 11.26 μg/mL[22]ABTS assayIC50 = 127.38 ± 3.83 μg/mLFRAP assay97.819 ± 0.377 mg equivalent ascorbic acid/g of extractDichloromethane extractDPPH assayIC50 = 8.18 ± 0.07 μg/mLABTS assayIC50 = 80.09 ± 0.65 μg/mLFRAP assay153.457 ± 0.247 mg equivalent ascorbic acid/g of extractEthyl acetate extractDPPH assayIC50 = 23.75 ± 0.67 μg/mLABTS assayIC50 = 85.16 ± 3.22 μg/mLFRAP assay123.004 ± 0.377 mg equivalent ascorbic acid/g of extractWater-ethanol extractDPPH assayIC50 = 3.86 ± 0.07 μg/mLABTS assayIC50 = 51.27 ± 0.82 μg/mLFRAP assay233.292 ± 0.377 mg equivalent ascorbic acid/g of extractLeavesHot aqueous extractDPPH assayIC50 = 0.343 ± 0.011 mg/mL[69]Iron-ferrous chelating power assayIC50 = 0.4539 ± 0.011 mg/mLCold aqueous extractDPPH assayIC50 = 0.652 ± 0.013 mg/mLIron-ferrous chelating power assayIC50 = 0.6394 ± 0.014 mg/mLEthanolic extractDPPH assayIC50 = 0.247 ± 0.011 mg/mLIron-ferrous chelating power assayIC50 = 0.3341 ± 0.012 mg/mLLeavesMethanolic extractDPPH assayPercent inhibition = 92.24%[75]Sbayou et al. [43] reported an important antioxidant activity of the EOs of T. satureioides aerial parts using different methods, namely, DPPH free radical scavenging, TBARS, and β-carotene/linoleic acid assays. In fact, the tested EOs exhibit a strong reduction of DPPH radical (IC50 = 0.25 ± 0.03 mg/mL) compared with ascorbic acid (IC50 = 0.25 ± 0.03 mg/mL) as standard antioxidant. However, the β-carotene/linoleic acid assay showed a moderate antioxidant capacity (I% = 81.78 ± 0.37%) compared to BHT (I% = 98.13 ± 0.94%) as positive control. Taoufik et al. [44] also investigated the antiradical capacity of the T. satureioides aerial part EOs using the DPPH scavenging test and reported an interesting antioxidant effect in a concentration-dependent manner. The IC50DPPH (IC50 = 0.81 mg/mL) value was slightly lower than the antioxidant standards BHT (IC50 = 0.11 mg/mL) and Covi-oxT (IC50 = 0.11 mg/mL).Another study assessed the antioxidant activity ofT. satureioides EOs using several in vitro assays, including ABTS, DPPH, β-carotene/linoleic acid bleaching, and reducing power assays, with quercetin and BHT as antioxidant standards [49]. The antiradical activity indicated that T. satureioides EOs exhibit stronger activity against free radical ABTS (IC50 = 0.15 ± 0.36 μg/mL) and DPPH (IC50 = 0.21 ± 1.17 μg/mL) than the used antioxidant standards. Moreover, β-carotene test and reducing power assays also showed high antioxidant activities with respective IC50 values of 0.21 ± 1.74 μg/mL and 0.23 ± 0.67 μg/mL [49]. In contrast, an investigation carried out by Alaoui-Jamali et al. [46] indicated that the T. satureioides aerial part EOs exhibit a moderate scavenging activity of DPPH radical (IC50 = 122.53 ± 2.38 μg/mL). The ferric (Fe3+) reducing capacity assay showed similar results with an EC50 value equal to 177.13 ± 2.1 μg/mL.In addition, the antioxidant capacity ofT. satureioides extracts was also studied by many researchers. Khouya and his coworkers [39] tested the antioxidant effect of ethyl acetate, methanolic, aqueous, dichloromethane, and crude extracts of T. satureioides aerial parts using DPPH radical scavenging, FRAP, and APPH assays and showed a higher reductive potential of these extracts than the reference compounds (Trolox). In fact, the highest reducing power of ferric metal was shown by the ethyl acetate fraction (IC50 = 82.69 ± 2.29 mmol Trolox/g of dry extract), and the lowest was observed for the aqueous fraction (IC50 = 25.46 ± 2.71 mmol Trolox/g of dry extract). The radical scavenging activity indicated that ethyl acetate fraction exerted the highest antioxidant activity with an IC50 value of 0.33 ± 0.02 mg/mL, followed by crude extract (IC50 = 0.44 ± 0.06 mg/mL), dichloromethane fraction (IC50 = 0.48 ± 0.05 mg/mL), and then methanolic fraction (IC50 = 0.71 ± 0.09 mg/mL). However, the aqueous fraction showed the weakest antiradical capacity (IC50 = 0.85 ± 0.06 mg/mL) [39]. Furthermore, the APPH test indicated that the addition of the tested extracts to suspensions containing erythrocyte and 2,2′-azobis 2-amidinopropane dihydrochloride (APPH) induced an increase in the hemolysis half times [39].The antioxidant activities ofT. satureioides extracts obtained from the aerial part were also examined by Labiad et al. [22] who reported remarkable antioxidant activities for hexane, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, and hydro-ethanolic extracts, using ABTS radical scavenging, DPPH, and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) methods, with ascorbic acid as positive control. The hydro-ethanolic extracts exhibited the highest antiradical effect against DPPH and ABTS radicals with IC50 values of 3.86 ± 0.07 μg/mL and 51.27 ± 0.82 μg/mL, respectively, followed by dichloromethane (IC50DPPH = 23.75 ± 0.67 μg/mL, IC50ABTS = 80.09 ± 0.65 μg/mL), ethyl acetate (IC50DPPH = 23.75 ± 0.67 μg/mL, IC50ABTS = 85.16 ± 3.22 μg/mL), and then hexane extracts (IC50DPPH = 275.71 ± 11.26 μg/mL, IC50ABTS = 127.38 ± 3.83 μg/mL). Moreover, the hydro-ethanolic extract also exerted a great FRAP activity (233.292 ± 0.377 mg equivalent Ascorbic acid/g of extract). However, the hexane extract showed the lowest FRAP capacity (97.819 ± 0.377 mg equivalent ascorbic acid/g of extract) [22].In a recent study, Hmidani et al. [76] measured the capacity of aqueous extract of T. satureioides to scavenge the generated radical ABTS+•, using ABTS assay, and showed significant scavenging activity of this extract (IC50ABTS = 14.65 ± 0.36 μg/ml) compared to ascorbic acid as standard (IC50 = 1.96 ± 0.1 μg/ml). These findings support those obtained by Khouya et al. [24], which showed a considerable antioxidant activity of the T. satureioides aerial part aqueous extract. Indeed, the tested aqueous extracts displayed potent scavenging activity against DPPH radical with an IC50 value equal to 0.44 ± 0.01 mg/mL TAE and a higher reducing power of ferric complex (40.14 ± 4.55 mmol Trolox/gTAE) than the Trolox used as positive control (44.33 ± 7.55 mmol Trolox/gTAE). Moreover, the aqueous extracts of T. satureioides exerted a potent protective potential against hemolysis of erythrocytes according to APPH test results [24]. These considerable antioxidant effects of the aqueous extracts were attributed to their high phenolic content [24].


## 3.4.3. Antifungal Activity

The antifungal activity ofT. satureioides, especially its essential oils against several pathogenic fungal, has been reported in the literature [19, 50, 78, 79].Boukhira et al. [20] evaluated the antifungal activity of T. satureioides EOs obtained from aerial parts against a yeast, Candida albicans (ATCC-10231), and a mould Aspergillus brasiliensis (ATCC-16404), using radial growth inhibition and broth microdilution assays. This study showed that the studied EOs exert effective effect against C. albicans (Ф = 24.67 ± 0.67 mm, MIC = 0.6 μl/mL) and A. brasiliensis (MIC = 1.3 μl/mL).Asdadi et al. [19] studied the anticandidal activity of T. satureioides EOs (10 μl) against nosocomial fluconazole-resistant strains (Candida dubliniensis, C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. krusei) using disc diffusion and microdilution methods, with fluconazole (10 μl) and amphotericin B (10 μl) as positive controls. According to this study, C. dubliniensis was the most sensitive strain to the tested EOs (Ф = 85 mm), followed by C. krusei (Ф = 67 mm), while C. albicans and C. glabrata were the least sensitive fungal strains with Ф of 53 mm and 49 mm, respectively. The microdilution assays showed an interesting anticandidal effect with minimal fungicidal concentration (MFC) values ranging between 0.3300 mg/mL and 0.9062 mg/ml [19].In addition, El Bouzidi et al. [15] assessed the anticandidal activity of T. satureioides EOs obtained from aerial parts against four candida species, including C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and C. krusei using disc diffusion and microdilution assays, and fluconazol (40 μl) as reference. The findings of this study showed that all tested strains were more sensitive to the tested EOs (37.67 ± 1.53 mm < Ф < 42.00 ± 1.00 mm) than to the synthetic fungicide (fluconazol) used as a positive control (26.50 ± 0.50 mm < Ф < 29.83 ± 1.15 mm).More interestingly, Salhi et al. [50] reported the antifungal activity of four chemotypes of T. satureioides EOs from aerial parts, namely, borneol/α-terpineol, borneol/carvacrol/α-terpineol, borneol/carvacrol/thymol, and borneol/camphene/α-terpineol against fungal strains responsible of wood damages (Coniophora puteana BAM Ebw. 15, Gloeophyllum trabeum BAM Ebw.109, Oligoporus placenta FPRL. 280, and Trametes versicolor CTB 863). The studied samples were harvested from four different locations in Southwest Morocco (Oulad Berhil, Amskroud-East, Aoulouz, and Timoulay Aksri), and qualitative and quantitative assays were used for antifungal screening [50]. The results showed that, at a concentration of 1/500 (v/v), all tested chemotypes inhibit the growth of the tested wood-decaying fungi. However, the investigated chemotypes exhibited a variable degree of the antifungal effect. Therefore, the chemotype borneol/carvacrol/thymol was the most active against the tested strains, followed by borneol/camphene/α-terpineol, borneol/α-terpineol, and borneol/carvacrol/α-terpineol. Moreover, the highest antifungal activity was noticed against G. trabeum with MIC ranging between 1/1500 v/v and 1/500 (v/v), followed by C. puteana (1/1250 (v/v) <MIC< 1/500 (v/v)), T. versicolor (MIC = 1/500 (v/v)), and O. placenta (MIC = 1/500 (v/v)) [50].In the same context, Rahmouni et al. [42] reported fungicide effect of T. satureioides EOs and their major components (thymol, α-terpineol, carvacrol, and borneol) against a phytopathogenic fungus responsible for fusarium wilt on date palm in Morocco, named Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Albedinis. The results of this study showed that these EOs as well as their major compounds inhibited noticeably the mycelia growth of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Albedinis in a concentration-dependent manner. The maximal fungicidal effect of the studied compounds was noticed by thymol with a minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) value of 03.08 μl/mL, followed by α-terpineol (MFC = 12.20 μl/mL), carvacrol (MFC = 16.96 μl/mL), and borneol (MFC = 22.73 μl/mL) [42]. Furthermore, T. satureioides EO was found to inhibit spore germination of phytopathogenic fungi of citrus, namely, Penicillium digitatum, P. italicum, and Galactomyces citriaurantii at concentrations greater than 500 μl/mL [79].Recently, El-Bakkal et al. [21] tested the antifungal effect of the EOs of T. satureioides aerial parts against Botrytis cinerea, P. digitatum, and Verticillium dahliae using disc diffusion method and fluconazol (40 μg/disc) as standard antifungal drug. Their results showed a promising antifungal effect, of the studied EOs, against the three tested strains, with inhibition zone diameters ranging from 31.50 ± 1.32 mm to 36.27 ± 1.15 mm compared to fluconazol (25.50 ± 0.50 < Ф < 28.00 ± 0.50).


## 3.4.4. Anti-Inflammatory Activity

Inflammation is a complex biological process that maintains homeostasis of the organism in response to multiple injuries such as infection, trauma, or immune reaction. It is characterized by pain, heat, redness, and swelling [80].Inflammation is related to the occurrence of several human pathologies, including heart diseases, Alzheimer’s disease, and cancer [81–83]. The mechanisms of the anti-inflammatory response involve various mediators such as phospholipase A2 activation, cytokines, chemokines, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, macrophages and mast cells, platelet-activating factor, and nitric oxide (NO) [83].Khouya et al. [39] have evaluated in vivo the anti-inflammatory activity of T. satureioides crude extracts and fractions (dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, methanol, and aqueous) using croton-oil-induced ear oedema and carrageenan-induced paw oedema in mice and rats. The results of this study showed that topical applications of the dichloromethane and ethyl acetate fractions (1 mg/ear) reduced significantly ear oedema volume of 31.60% and 27.16%, respectively, after 4 h of treatment. The crude extracts exhibited the greatest activity, and its tropical application decreased significantly ear oedema (29.67%) 8 h after treatment. However, the methanol and aqueous fractions did not decrease ear oedema. Moreover, the results of carrageenan oedema assay showed that the ethyl acetate and methanol fractions (60 mg/kg) reduced significantly oedema induced by carrageenan during the first phase (16.40 ± 0.33% and 14.51 ± 1.40%, respectively) [39]. This study confirmed results obtained by the same authors, indicating that aqueous extracts of T. satureioides exhibited a remarkable anti-inflammatory effect in carrageenan-induced rats paw edema and in croton oil-induced mice ear edema [24]. In another previous study, Ismaili et al. [14] investigated the in vivo topical anti-inflammatory effect of methanol and chloroform extracts of T. satureioides leaves, using the croton oil ear test in mice, and showed that chloroform extract induced significant edema inhibition (at a inhibition dose ID50 of 282 μg·cm−2), only three times lower than that of the standard conventional drug indomethacin used as positive control (ID50 = 93 μg·cm−2), while the methanolic extract did not show any topical anti-inflammatory activity.


## 3.4.5. Antiparasitic Effect

T. satureioides EOs from different plant parts were studied against a number of human, virus, and plant parasites. Indeed, Pavela [84] assessed the toxicity of T. satureioides EOs against the larvae of Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae) and showed its effective larvicidal property with respective lethal concentrations (IC50 and IC90) of 44 μg/ml and 81.5 μg/ml.Kasrati et al. [49] reported a considerable insecticidal activity of T. satureioides EOs against adults of pest Tribolium castaneum responsible for stored-product deterioration (lethal dose values of LD50 = 0.315 μl/cm2 and LD90 = 0.71 μl/cm2). Moreover, Santana et al. [25] examined the toxicity of T. satureioides EOs against insect pest’s larvae of Spodoptera littoralis, insect adults of Myzus persicae and Rhopalosiphum padi, as well as against adults and eggs of root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne javanica. A strong antifeedant effect of T. satureioides EOs was observed against S. littoralis larvae (EC50 = 36.9 ± 22.7 μg/cm2), M. persicae adults (EC50 = 53.53 ± 6.5 μg/cm2), and R. padi (EC50 = 49.0 ± 6.6 μg/cm2). Additionally, an important nematicidal effect was noticed against the tested M. javanica at two different development stages: second-stage juveniles (J2) (LC50 = 0.1 mg/mL and LC90 = 0.2 mg/mL) and eggs (mortality rate of 38.9% after 7 days) [25].Another study conducted by Avato et al. [26] showed that T. satureioides EOs exhibit a promising nematicidal activity against Meloidogyne incognita juveniles (mortality rate of 10.6 ± 0.7%) and adults of Pratylenchus vulnus (100 ± 0.0%) and Xiphinema index (14.9 ± 0.7%) and that, after 48 h, this effect was dose-dependent.The acaricidal activity ofT. satureioides EOs was also reported in the literature. Ramzi et al. [85] studied the effect of the EOs of T. satureioides aerial parts against adults of Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae) and indicated an interesting mortality rate of 50% after 24 h and 80% after 48 h. Additionally, T. satureioides EO was shown to destroy completely the wheat pest Sitophilus oryzae (coleopters) at a concentration of 2.4 × 10−2 μl/cm3 after 24 h [86].


## 3.4.6. Other Pharmacological Properties

T. satureioides was also reported to exhibit other pharmacological properties such as anticancer, antidiabetic, and hypolipidemic effects.Jaafari et al. [23] evaluated the in vitro antitumor activity of T. satureioides EOs collected in different regions (High Atlas of Morocco, Bin Elwidane-Beni Mellal, and Tiznit) on P815 mastocytoma cell line using the 3-(4,5-di-methylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. The results showed that all tested EOs exhibit an important cytotoxic effect against P815 cell line with IC50 values from 0.225% (v/v) to 0.24% (v/v). The antiproliferative effect of T. satureioides crude extracts was studied against MCF-7 breast cancer cell line using MTT assay and showed their strong inhibition with a half-inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of 37.5 ± 4.02 μg/mL [24].Kabbaoui et al. [2] investigated the antidiabetic effect of T. satureioides aqueous extracts obtained from the aerial parts on streptozotocin- (STZ-) induced diabetic rats via the administration of an oral concentration of 500 mg/kg. As a result, T. satureioides aqueous extracts decreased significantly blood glucose levels and improved body weight and glucose tolerance in STZ-diabetic rats.


## 4. Conclusion and Perspectives

This scientific review reports the ethnomedicinal uses, chemical profile, and pharmacological properties of an endemic Moroccan medicinal plant:T. satureioides. This plant is widely used in Moroccan traditional medicine to treat several diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, skin ailments, and bronchitis.Indeed, several investigations have demonstrated thatT. satureioides exhibits numerous biological activities, including antibacterial, antifungal, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antidiabetic, and antiparasitic activities. These pharmacological effects have proven the traditional uses of T. satureioides. However, the evidence supporting the traditional practices such as skin disorders, hypertension, influenza, and visual ailments of modern pharmacology is still limited. In this regard, we invite research groups to conduct further studies on the antiviral, antileishmanial, and hypotensive effects of T. satureioides. Furthermore, the pharmacological mechanisms of action, of this plant, on molecular targets need to be explored using current experimental assessments such as network pharmacology, proteomic, and pharmacokinetic. Additionally, an appropriate pharmacological approach should be considered for providing comprehensive pharmacological information for T. satureioides. Moreover, T. satureioides have shown interesting biological effects against some related oxidative stress such as inflammation and cancer. Accordingly, extensive clinical studies should be carried out to determine pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic parameters in order to develop drug from T. satureioides.The phytochemical analysis using different chromatographic tools such as GC-MS and HPLC revealed the presence of a plethora of bioactive compounds mainly belonging to the terpenoids class in the essential oils ofT. satureioides. This chemical diversity varied depending on plant’s part used, season’s harvest, plant’s origin, as well as extraction and storage conditions. However, although numerous bioactive compounds have been isolated and identified from T. satureioides essential oils, few pure components have been assessed for their pharmacological effects. Furthermore, few studies have investigated the phenolic content of T. satureioides extracts. Therefore, further efforts should be focused on such area in order to determine in detail the phenolic profile of this species using different extraction solvents and the current spectroscopic tools such as HPLC-DAD, infrared (IR), and 1H NMR technique.Finally, the acute, subacute, and subchronic toxicity tests are strongly required to verify the innocuity and the safety of this plant.



---

*Source: 6673838-2021-01-27.xml*