# Upregulation of miR-138 Increases Sensitivity to Cisplatin in Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Regulating EZH2

Authors: Taohui Zeng; Lin Luo; Yuye Huang; Xiaoli Ye; Jinhai Lin
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

Chemotherapeutic insensitivity is a major obstacle for effective treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently, new evidence showed that microRNAs (miRNAs) are closely related to drug sensitivity. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between miR-138 expression and cisplatin sensitivity of HCC cells by regulation of EZH2. CCK-8, EdU, and western blotting are determining the cell viability, proliferation, EZH2, and EMT-related protein expression. It was found that compared with normal samples, miR-138 expression was lower in cancer tissue; it was also downregulated in HCC cells. Transfected with miR-138 mimic increased sensitivity of HCC cells to cisplatin. Mechanistically, Luciferase Reporter analysis verified the interaction between miR-138 and target gene EZH2. Inhibition of EZH2 enhanced cisplatin sensitivity and transfection with EZH2 mimic mirrored the function of miR-138 in cisplatin sensitivity. Furthermore, the role of miR-138 on reversed cisplatin-induced epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) was attenuated when combined with EZH2 plasmid. In conclusion, all data from this study illustrate that miR-138 may as a tumor suppressor provides a potential treatment method to treating HCC.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a very aggressive malignancy tumor all over the world, which is characterized by easy recurrence and metastasis, poor prognosis, and high mortality [1]. Commonly used therapeutic regimens include 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), sorafenib, adriamycin, camptothecin, and gemcitabine [2, 3]. Cisplatin is a widely used first-line chemotherapeutic drug for the treatment in a variety of cancers, such as HCC [4, 5]. However, the clinical applications of cisplatin have been largely restricted [6]. Chemotherapy resistance limits the use of therapy for HCC. Therefore, solving the mechanisms of chemotherapy resistance in HCC is an important issue that we need to pay more attention.More and more evidences show that the role of microRNAs (miRNAs) in tumorigenesis and the formation of drug resistance were very important [7]. MiRNAs are a small, siRNA-like molecular, encoded by the genome of higher eukaryotes, and guide the silencing complex to degrade mRNA or hider its translation by base pairing with the target gene mRNA [8]. Transfection with miR-9 mimic regulated drug resistance via downregulating EIF5A2 and epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in HCC [9]. Upregulation of miR-33a-5p enhanced the cisplatin sensitivity in HCC [10].MiR-138 levels are downregulated in multiple cancer cells; therefore, it may be a tumor suppressor [11–14]. Specifically, upregulation of miR-138 inhibits cell viability and the capability of metastasis and invasion, increases the number of apoptosis cells, and enhances sensitivity to drugs via inhibition of multiple targets [12, 15, 16]. However, whether and how miR-138 participates in cisplatin resistance in HCC cells remains unknown.Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) is involved in the regulation of the development of embryonic and cell proliferation [17]. It is a subunit of polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) and catalyzes methylation of histone 3 lysine 27 [18]. As an oncogene, it is related to the ability of malignant and poor prognosis of various cancers [19, 20]. Overexpression of EZH2 promoted the progression of acquired resistance to cisplatin in ovarian cancer [21]. Inhibition of miR-218 promoted the ability of metastasis via Slug/ZEB2 signaling and EMT in lung cancer cells [22]. Our present study evaluated the effect and explored the potential mechanisms of miR-138 in the sensitivity of HCC cells to cisplatin.


## 2. Material and Methods

### 2.1. Cell Culture

The human HCC cell lines (Huh7, Bel-7402, SMMC-7721, HepG2, and SNU449) and the liver cell line LO2 were purchased from ATCC and incubated at a humidified incubator (condition: 37°C, 5% CO2). All the HCC cells were grown in DMEM medium (Gibco), except Bel-7402 and SNU49 cells (RPMI 1640; Gibco), which contained 10% FBS (Gibco) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Sigma).


### 2.2. Cell Viability

Firstly, seeded the HCC cell lines at a density of5×103 cells/well onto the 96-well plates, after incubation overnight to until cell attachment, and treated with cisplatin (0, 0.357, 0.75, 1, 5, 3, or 6 μg/mL) for 48 h or transfected with miR-138 mimic, EZH2 small interfering RNA (siRNA) followed by cisplatin (cis) for 48 h. Then, 10 μL of CCK-8 solution added to per well and incubated for 2 h, measured the absorbance at 450 nm using a MRX II microplate reader.


### 2.3. Transfection

The EZH2 siRNA was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; miR-138-5p mimic, inhibitor, and negative control were synthesized by Guangzhou RiboBio. The transfection we had used Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the corresponding’s protocol.EZH2 siRNA5′-TTCGAGCTCCTCTGAATCAAA-3′


### 2.4. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (RT-qPCR)

TRIzol reagent was performed to extract total RNA (Invitrogen), used a reserve transcription reagent kit (TaKaRa) to reserve transcribed RNA to first-strand cDNA using. TheMx3005P real-time PCR system (Strata gene) and SYBR Green dyestuff (TaKaRa) were used for RT-qPCR reaction. The miRNA-138a and EZH2 expression were analyzed by the comparative 2-∆∆Ct method. We used GAPDH and U6 as internal controls. The target gene was shown as follows:miR-138-5p mimic:Forward:5′-AGCUGG UGUUGUGAAUCAGGCCG-3′Reverse:5′-GCCUGAUUCACA ACACCAGCUUU-3′NC mimics:Forward:5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′Reverse:5′-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT-3′miR-138-5p inhibitor:5′-CGGCCUGAUUCACAACACCAGCU-3′NC inhibitor:5′-CAGUACUUUUGUGUAGUACAA-3′


### 2.5. Western Blotting

40μg protein from different groups with loading buffer were loaded by 10% SDS-PAGE, then transferred to PVDF membrane (Millipore), later blocked for 2 h at 37°C on the shaker slowly, washed the membrane with TBST for three times on the shaker slowly, and incubated overnight with primary antibodies (EZH2; E-cadherin; and vimentin; 1 : 1000 in TBS-T) at 4°C on a side-swing shaker, washed the membrane again on the shaker slowly, incubated with corresponding secondary antibodies for 2 h at 37°C on a side-swing shaker. Finally, the membrane with the bands was performed to detect using enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA).


### 2.6. Luciferase Reporter Assay

Firstly, constructed the wild or mutant type EZH2-3′UTR binding sequence for miR-138 and cotransfected with luciferase reporter vectors using Lipofectamine 2000, transfection for 48 h, the activities of luciferase were quantified using a luciferase reporter assay (Promega).


### 2.7. EdU Assay Analysis

Proliferation of cells in HCC was determined using EdU staining proliferation kit according to the manufacturer’s (Abcam) protocols.


### 2.8. Statistical Analysis

Mean±standarddeviationSD was indicated in the experimental data. Compared with two or multiple groups, Student’s t-test and one-way analysis of variance were performed, respectively. The value of P less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis of data was analyzed using the Graphpad Prism 8.0 software.


## 2.1. Cell Culture

The human HCC cell lines (Huh7, Bel-7402, SMMC-7721, HepG2, and SNU449) and the liver cell line LO2 were purchased from ATCC and incubated at a humidified incubator (condition: 37°C, 5% CO2). All the HCC cells were grown in DMEM medium (Gibco), except Bel-7402 and SNU49 cells (RPMI 1640; Gibco), which contained 10% FBS (Gibco) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Sigma).


## 2.2. Cell Viability

Firstly, seeded the HCC cell lines at a density of5×103 cells/well onto the 96-well plates, after incubation overnight to until cell attachment, and treated with cisplatin (0, 0.357, 0.75, 1, 5, 3, or 6 μg/mL) for 48 h or transfected with miR-138 mimic, EZH2 small interfering RNA (siRNA) followed by cisplatin (cis) for 48 h. Then, 10 μL of CCK-8 solution added to per well and incubated for 2 h, measured the absorbance at 450 nm using a MRX II microplate reader.


## 2.3. Transfection

The EZH2 siRNA was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; miR-138-5p mimic, inhibitor, and negative control were synthesized by Guangzhou RiboBio. The transfection we had used Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the corresponding’s protocol.EZH2 siRNA5′-TTCGAGCTCCTCTGAATCAAA-3′


## 2.4. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (RT-qPCR)

TRIzol reagent was performed to extract total RNA (Invitrogen), used a reserve transcription reagent kit (TaKaRa) to reserve transcribed RNA to first-strand cDNA using. TheMx3005P real-time PCR system (Strata gene) and SYBR Green dyestuff (TaKaRa) were used for RT-qPCR reaction. The miRNA-138a and EZH2 expression were analyzed by the comparative 2-∆∆Ct method. We used GAPDH and U6 as internal controls. The target gene was shown as follows:miR-138-5p mimic:Forward:5′-AGCUGG UGUUGUGAAUCAGGCCG-3′Reverse:5′-GCCUGAUUCACA ACACCAGCUUU-3′NC mimics:Forward:5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′Reverse:5′-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT-3′miR-138-5p inhibitor:5′-CGGCCUGAUUCACAACACCAGCU-3′NC inhibitor:5′-CAGUACUUUUGUGUAGUACAA-3′


## 2.5. Western Blotting

40μg protein from different groups with loading buffer were loaded by 10% SDS-PAGE, then transferred to PVDF membrane (Millipore), later blocked for 2 h at 37°C on the shaker slowly, washed the membrane with TBST for three times on the shaker slowly, and incubated overnight with primary antibodies (EZH2; E-cadherin; and vimentin; 1 : 1000 in TBS-T) at 4°C on a side-swing shaker, washed the membrane again on the shaker slowly, incubated with corresponding secondary antibodies for 2 h at 37°C on a side-swing shaker. Finally, the membrane with the bands was performed to detect using enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA).


## 2.6. Luciferase Reporter Assay

Firstly, constructed the wild or mutant type EZH2-3′UTR binding sequence for miR-138 and cotransfected with luciferase reporter vectors using Lipofectamine 2000, transfection for 48 h, the activities of luciferase were quantified using a luciferase reporter assay (Promega).


## 2.7. EdU Assay Analysis

Proliferation of cells in HCC was determined using EdU staining proliferation kit according to the manufacturer’s (Abcam) protocols.


## 2.8. Statistical Analysis

Mean±standarddeviationSD was indicated in the experimental data. Compared with two or multiple groups, Student’s t-test and one-way analysis of variance were performed, respectively. The value of P less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis of data was analyzed using the Graphpad Prism 8.0 software.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. The Level of miR-138 Was Related to Sensitivity to Cis

To explore the potential effect of miR-138 in HCC, starBase v.3 was performed to analyze the level of miR-138 in liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC), showing that it was reduced in 370 LIHC samples compared with 50 normal samples (Figure1(a)). Then, RT-qPCR that compared with the normal liver cells, miR-138 expression was decreased in HCC cells (Figure 1(b)). The HepG2 cell had a higher expression of miR-138 was more sensitive to cis by CCK-8 assay (Figure 2(a)). We also found that miR-138 was downregulated following treatment with cis for 24 or 48 h (Figure 2(b)). The above data showed that miR-138 expression might be correlated with cis sensitivity.Figure 1
The level of miR-138 was downregulated in HCC cells. (a) StartBase v3.0 was used to predict miR-138-5p expression. (b) MiR-138-5p level was lower in HCC cells than normal liver LO2 cells.∗∗P<0.01, ∗∗∗P<0.001 vs. LO2.
(a)(b)Figure 2
MiR-138 expression was negatively associated with cis sensitivity in HCC cells. (a) CCK-8 assay examined the cell viability in SNU449 and HepG2 cells. (b) Expression of miR-138-5p treated with cisplatin for 24 or 48 h using RT-qPCR analysis.∗∗P<0.01, ∗∗∗P<0.001 vs. control.
(a)(b)(c)


### 3.2. Overexpression of miR-138 Could Enhance Cis Sensitivity

To further explore the sensitivity effect of miR-138 to cis in HCC, we transfected with miR-138 mimic to HCC and observed cell viability and proliferation. RT-qPCR determined the transfection of miR-138 mimic (Figure3(a)). Upregulation of miR-138 could enhance sensitivity to cis (Figure 3(b), 3(C)). EdU analysis also confirmed that miR-138 combined with cis could reduce cell proliferation (Figures 3(d)–3(f)).Figure 3
Overexpression of miR-138 could regulate sensitivity to cis. (a) The level of miR-138 was confirmed by RT-qPCR.∗∗∗P<0.001. (b, c) CCK-8 assay assessing the cell viability with or without miR-138 mimic following cisplatin treatment. (d–f) EdU assay analysis cell proliferation with or without miR-138 mimic following cisplatin treatment. ∗P<0.05, ∗∗P<0.01.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


### 3.3. EZH2 Is a Direct Target of miR-138

TargetScan was identified to predict miR-138 regulatory targets. Interestingly,EZH2 was predicted to be a target gene of miR-138 (Figure 4(a)). To further validate the relationship between EZH2 and miR-138, a luciferase reporter analysis proved that miR-138 mimic significantly reduced the luciferase activity of wild-type (WT) EZH2 (Figures 4(b) and 4(c)). And transfection with miR-138 mimic decreased EZH2 expression (Figures 4(d) and 4(e)). We also used the GEPIA database to analyze the level of E2HZ in LIHC; EZH2 levels were higher in 374 LIHC samples compared with 50 normal samples (Figure 4(f)). Furthermore, EZH2 with higher expression was associated with poor overall survival (Figure 4(g)).Figure 4
EZH2 is a direct target of miR-138. (a) TargetScan predicted miR-138 binding sites on EZH2. (b, c) Relative luciferase activity of HCC cells co-transfected with WT-EZH2 or Mut-EZH2 and NC, inhibitor NC, or miR-138-5p mimic and inhibitor.∗∗P<0.01. (d, e) Western blotting and RT-qPCR confirmed the EZH2 expression after with or without miR-138 mimic. (f) StartBase v3.0 predicted EZH2 expression in 374 LIHC and 50 normal samples. (g) GEPIA database analyzed the difference of overall survival between high and low EZH2 expression in LIHC cancer.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)


### 3.4. si-EZH2-Mediated Knockdown Enhanced HCC Cell Sensitivity to Cis in HCC Cells

Considering that EZH2 is dramatically upregulated in HCC tissues, we hypothesized that inhibition of EZH2 and cisplatin should act synergistically in resistant cell lines. To verify this hypothesis, we transfected HCC cells with EZH2 siRNA to inhibit EZH2 expression, and CCK-8 assay and EdU analysis were determined to assess cell viability and proliferation. Western blotting and qRT-PCR confirmed the cell interference efficiency of EZH2; the relative expression of EZH2 mRNA is represented as a histogram (Figures5(a) and 5(b)). si-EZH2 enhanced cis sensitivity and decreased proliferation of HCC cells; EdU-positive cells are represented as a histogram (Figures 5(c)–5(g)). These results indicate that knockdown of EZH2 increased sensitivity to cis in HCC cells.Figure 5
siRNA-mediated knockdown of EZH2 could enhance sensitivity to cis. (a, b) EZH2 protein and mRNA was detected by western blotting and RT-q-PCR.∗∗P<0.01, ∗∗∗P<0.001 vs. NC siRNA. (c, d) Cell viability was detected following treatment with different concentrations of cis for 48 h with or without EZH2 siRNA by CCK-8 assay. (e–g) Cell proliferation was reduced following transfection with EZH2 siRNA and cisplatin treatment as determined by EdU analysis. ∗∗P<0.01.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)


### 3.5. EMT Is Related with miR-138-EZH2 Mediated the Regulation of Cis Sensitivity

Next, we analyzed the molecular mechanism underlying miR-138-EZH2 mediated the regulation of cis sensitivity. Firstly, we detected cell viability following transfected with miR-138 mimic, with or without EZH2 plasmid and with cisplatin treatment, indicating that the effect of miR-138 mimic on cis sensitivity was lost when combined with the EZH2 plasmid in HCC cells (Figure6(a)). Next, we examined E-cadherin and vimentin expression. As shown in Figure 6(b), miR-138 upregulated the decrease in cis-induced E-cadherin expression and downregulated cis-induced the increase of vimentin expression. Moreover, the role of miR-138 on reversed cis-induced EMT was attenuated when combined with the EZH2 plasmid, indicated that miR-138 regulates drug sensitivity via targeting the EZH2/EMT axis in HCC cells.Figure 6
EMT is involved in miR-138 and EZH2-mediated regulation of sensitivity to cis. (a) CCK-8 assay analyzed cell viability of different groups (NC mimic, miR-138 mimic, NC mimic+cis, miR-138 mimic+cis, miR-138 mimic+EZH2 plasmid+cis). (b) Western blotting was determined to analyze E-cadherin and vimentin expression in the different groups (NC mimic, miR-138 mimic, NC mimic+cis, miR-138 mimic+cis, miR-138 mimic+EZH2 plasmid+cis).
(a)(b)


## 3.1. The Level of miR-138 Was Related to Sensitivity to Cis

To explore the potential effect of miR-138 in HCC, starBase v.3 was performed to analyze the level of miR-138 in liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC), showing that it was reduced in 370 LIHC samples compared with 50 normal samples (Figure1(a)). Then, RT-qPCR that compared with the normal liver cells, miR-138 expression was decreased in HCC cells (Figure 1(b)). The HepG2 cell had a higher expression of miR-138 was more sensitive to cis by CCK-8 assay (Figure 2(a)). We also found that miR-138 was downregulated following treatment with cis for 24 or 48 h (Figure 2(b)). The above data showed that miR-138 expression might be correlated with cis sensitivity.Figure 1
The level of miR-138 was downregulated in HCC cells. (a) StartBase v3.0 was used to predict miR-138-5p expression. (b) MiR-138-5p level was lower in HCC cells than normal liver LO2 cells.∗∗P<0.01, ∗∗∗P<0.001 vs. LO2.
(a)(b)Figure 2
MiR-138 expression was negatively associated with cis sensitivity in HCC cells. (a) CCK-8 assay examined the cell viability in SNU449 and HepG2 cells. (b) Expression of miR-138-5p treated with cisplatin for 24 or 48 h using RT-qPCR analysis.∗∗P<0.01, ∗∗∗P<0.001 vs. control.
(a)(b)(c)


## 3.2. Overexpression of miR-138 Could Enhance Cis Sensitivity

To further explore the sensitivity effect of miR-138 to cis in HCC, we transfected with miR-138 mimic to HCC and observed cell viability and proliferation. RT-qPCR determined the transfection of miR-138 mimic (Figure3(a)). Upregulation of miR-138 could enhance sensitivity to cis (Figure 3(b), 3(C)). EdU analysis also confirmed that miR-138 combined with cis could reduce cell proliferation (Figures 3(d)–3(f)).Figure 3
Overexpression of miR-138 could regulate sensitivity to cis. (a) The level of miR-138 was confirmed by RT-qPCR.∗∗∗P<0.001. (b, c) CCK-8 assay assessing the cell viability with or without miR-138 mimic following cisplatin treatment. (d–f) EdU assay analysis cell proliferation with or without miR-138 mimic following cisplatin treatment. ∗P<0.05, ∗∗P<0.01.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


## 3.3. EZH2 Is a Direct Target of miR-138

TargetScan was identified to predict miR-138 regulatory targets. Interestingly,EZH2 was predicted to be a target gene of miR-138 (Figure 4(a)). To further validate the relationship between EZH2 and miR-138, a luciferase reporter analysis proved that miR-138 mimic significantly reduced the luciferase activity of wild-type (WT) EZH2 (Figures 4(b) and 4(c)). And transfection with miR-138 mimic decreased EZH2 expression (Figures 4(d) and 4(e)). We also used the GEPIA database to analyze the level of E2HZ in LIHC; EZH2 levels were higher in 374 LIHC samples compared with 50 normal samples (Figure 4(f)). Furthermore, EZH2 with higher expression was associated with poor overall survival (Figure 4(g)).Figure 4
EZH2 is a direct target of miR-138. (a) TargetScan predicted miR-138 binding sites on EZH2. (b, c) Relative luciferase activity of HCC cells co-transfected with WT-EZH2 or Mut-EZH2 and NC, inhibitor NC, or miR-138-5p mimic and inhibitor.∗∗P<0.01. (d, e) Western blotting and RT-qPCR confirmed the EZH2 expression after with or without miR-138 mimic. (f) StartBase v3.0 predicted EZH2 expression in 374 LIHC and 50 normal samples. (g) GEPIA database analyzed the difference of overall survival between high and low EZH2 expression in LIHC cancer.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)


## 3.4. si-EZH2-Mediated Knockdown Enhanced HCC Cell Sensitivity to Cis in HCC Cells

Considering that EZH2 is dramatically upregulated in HCC tissues, we hypothesized that inhibition of EZH2 and cisplatin should act synergistically in resistant cell lines. To verify this hypothesis, we transfected HCC cells with EZH2 siRNA to inhibit EZH2 expression, and CCK-8 assay and EdU analysis were determined to assess cell viability and proliferation. Western blotting and qRT-PCR confirmed the cell interference efficiency of EZH2; the relative expression of EZH2 mRNA is represented as a histogram (Figures5(a) and 5(b)). si-EZH2 enhanced cis sensitivity and decreased proliferation of HCC cells; EdU-positive cells are represented as a histogram (Figures 5(c)–5(g)). These results indicate that knockdown of EZH2 increased sensitivity to cis in HCC cells.Figure 5
siRNA-mediated knockdown of EZH2 could enhance sensitivity to cis. (a, b) EZH2 protein and mRNA was detected by western blotting and RT-q-PCR.∗∗P<0.01, ∗∗∗P<0.001 vs. NC siRNA. (c, d) Cell viability was detected following treatment with different concentrations of cis for 48 h with or without EZH2 siRNA by CCK-8 assay. (e–g) Cell proliferation was reduced following transfection with EZH2 siRNA and cisplatin treatment as determined by EdU analysis. ∗∗P<0.01.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)


## 3.5. EMT Is Related with miR-138-EZH2 Mediated the Regulation of Cis Sensitivity

Next, we analyzed the molecular mechanism underlying miR-138-EZH2 mediated the regulation of cis sensitivity. Firstly, we detected cell viability following transfected with miR-138 mimic, with or without EZH2 plasmid and with cisplatin treatment, indicating that the effect of miR-138 mimic on cis sensitivity was lost when combined with the EZH2 plasmid in HCC cells (Figure6(a)). Next, we examined E-cadherin and vimentin expression. As shown in Figure 6(b), miR-138 upregulated the decrease in cis-induced E-cadherin expression and downregulated cis-induced the increase of vimentin expression. Moreover, the role of miR-138 on reversed cis-induced EMT was attenuated when combined with the EZH2 plasmid, indicated that miR-138 regulates drug sensitivity via targeting the EZH2/EMT axis in HCC cells.Figure 6
EMT is involved in miR-138 and EZH2-mediated regulation of sensitivity to cis. (a) CCK-8 assay analyzed cell viability of different groups (NC mimic, miR-138 mimic, NC mimic+cis, miR-138 mimic+cis, miR-138 mimic+EZH2 plasmid+cis). (b) Western blotting was determined to analyze E-cadherin and vimentin expression in the different groups (NC mimic, miR-138 mimic, NC mimic+cis, miR-138 mimic+cis, miR-138 mimic+EZH2 plasmid+cis).
(a)(b)


## 4. Discussion

miRNAs play a vital role in cell angiogenesis, proliferation, death, differentiation, and metabolic stress responses [23, 24]. Dysregulation of miRNAs act as oncogenes or tumor suppressors in many cancers [21, 24, 25]. Interestingly, compared with drug-sensitive cells, the changed of miRNA expression has been observed in many drug-resistant HCC cells, indicated that using different miRNAs to predict the therapeutic effect from different drugs may promote treatment of every HCC patient [26, 27]. For instance, miR-340 could reverse resistance to cisplatin through the regulation of Nrf2-dependent antioxidant pathway of HCC [28]. Overexpression of miR-140-3p increases sensitivity to sorafenib by targeting PXR in HCC [29]. miR-138a function as a tumor suppressor plays an important role in different types of cancers [11, 14, 30]. It had been reported that miR-138 plays important roles in cell proliferation, migration, and invasion [31, 32]. However, the effect of miR-138 on chemotherapy resistance via regulating EZH2 in HCC was not investigated. In this study, we used starBase analysis showed that miR-138-5p was downregulated in HCC tissues. Furthermore, it was also decreased in five HCC cells. MiR-138 mimic reduced cell proliferation and enhanced apoptosis in many cancer cells by reducing the expression of EZH2 [30, 33, 34]. Upregulation of miR-138 results in decreased EZH2 expression. Suppression of EZH2 expression could enhance drug sensitivity in HCC cells [35]. Therefore, EZH2 is a key gene that regulates chemotherapy resistance in HCC cells. Our data also confirmed that EZH2 is a target of miR-138 in HCC cells and thereby reducing the level of EZH2 in HCC cells. Moreover, both miR-138 overexpression and inhibition of EZH2 could inhibit the EMT and enhance cisplatin sensitivity. Altogether, these experimental data indicate that EZH2 is a functional target gene of miR-138, thus modulating cisplatin resistance in HCC.miRNAs play an important regulator role in cell viability, invasion, migration, and the EMT process [36]. During the process of EMT, epithelial cells change their morphology, resulting in a mesenchymal phenotype, and it is very important for cell invasiveness, proliferation, and motility of tumor cells and has also been confirmed to be important factors inducing drug resistance in cancer cells [37, 38]. Furthermore, targeting the EMT could reverse the resistance of translational therapy and therapy inhibiting the tumor development [39]. MiR-138 upregulation reduces cell invasion in various types of cancer cells via inhibiting the EMT process [40, 41]. This study revealed that miR-138 mediates the EMT to regulate sensitivity to cisplatin in HCC cells, as evidenced by the regulation of important markers of the EMT.


## 5. Conclusion

The data shown in our report indicate that miR-138-5p enhances cisplatin sensitivity in HCC cells by inhibiting EZH2. These findings provide a new treatment strategy for overcoming chemotherapy resistance of HCC.



---

*Source: 6665918-2021-03-08.xml*