# Genetic Variant ofKalirin Gene Is Associated with Ischemic Stroke in a Chinese Han Population

Authors: Hong Li; Shasha Yu; Rui Wang; Zhaoqing Sun; Xinghu Zhou; Liqiang Zheng; Zhihua Yin; Xingang Zhang; Yingxian Sun
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

Introduction. Ischemic stroke is a complex disorder resulting from the interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Previous studies showed that kalirin gene variations were associated with cardiovascular disease. However, the association between this gene and ischemic stroke was unknown. We performed this study to confirm if kalirin gene variation was associated with ischemic stroke.Methods. We enrolled 385 ischemic stroke patients and 362 controls from China. Three SNPs of kalirin gene were genotyped by means of ligase detection reaction-PCR method. Data was processed with SPSS and SHEsis platform.Results. SNP rs7620580 (dominant model: OR = 1.590,p = 0.002 and adjusted OR = 1.662,p = 0.014; additive model: OR = 1.490,p = 0.002 and adjusted OR = 1.636,p = 0.005; recessive model: OR = 2.686,p = 0.039) and SNP rs1708303 (dominant model: OR = 1.523,p= 0.007 and adjusted OR = 1.604,p = 0.028; additive model: OR = 1.438,p = 0.01 and adjusted OR = 1.476,p = 0.039) were associated with ischemic stroke. The GG genotype and G allele of SNP rs7620580 were associated with a risk for ischemic stroke with an adjusted OR of 3.195 and an OR of 1.446, respectively. Haplotype analysis revealed that A–T–G,G-T-A, and A-T-A haplotypes were associated with ischemic stroke.Conclusions. Our results provide evidence that kalirin gene variations were associated with ischemic stroke in the Chinese Han population.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Cerebrovascular diseases and cardiovascular diseases are among the top three leading causes of death and disability worldwide [1, 2]. The mortality rate due to stroke is as high as 276.9/100,000 each year in China [3], which means nearly 400,000 people die of stroke every year. Ischemic stroke (IS) is a complex disorder resulting from the interplay of genetic and environmental factors (such as age, smoking, hypertension, cardiac arrhythmias, and diabetes mellitus) [4]. It has been shown that genetic factors increase the risk of stroke. The risk rate of a person with a family history of stroke is up to 30% [5]. Compared with dizygotic twins, the rates of death and hospitalization due to stroke were increased for monozygotic twins [6].Present prevention and treatment of stroke are involved in the control of risk factors [7] and revascularization of vascular stenosis. Medical therapy was often effective for preventing stroke. However, some patients may still experience recurrent ischemic stroke in spite of receiving aggressive medical treatment [8]. With the rapid advance of precise medicine, it is of great importance to find and validate biomarkers for the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of stroke.The protein encoded for by thekalirin gene (KALRN) is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), which has numerous functions, such as neuron morphogenesis [9, 10], modifies synphilin-1 aggregate transport [11], and promotes smooth muscle cell (SMC) migration and proliferation [12]. Studies found thatKALRN gene variations were associated with CHD [13–16]. As an atherosclerotic disease, stroke may share some genes with coronary heart disease (CHD). A possible association betweenKALRN gene polymorphisms and IS among distinct population remains unknown. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate ifKALRN SNPs were associated with ischemic stroke among Han Chinese.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Subjects

A cohort of 747 individuals, including 385 ischemic stroke patients and 362 hypertensive controls without stroke, was included in the present study. The ischemic stroke group was composed of 297 patients found during the epidemiological survey of Fuxin rural areas (Liaoning province, China) [17] and 88 ischemic stroke patients from the First Hospital of China Medical University. The study subjects were unrelated to one another, were all Han Chinese, and were older than 35 years of age. Subjects were excluded if they had a history of hemorrhagic stroke, tumor, trauma, myocardial infarction, or atrial arrhythmia. All IS cases were confirmed to be atherosclerotic ischemic stroke by brain imaging using computed tomography (CT) scanning and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A diagnosis of IS was confirmed by 2 neurologists.The control group included unrelated individuals without any history or symptoms of cerebrovascular disease and were matched with the IS patients for residency area, ethnic origin, and gender. Brain imaging was not used for controls. As stroke is a late-onset disease, we selected older people as controls to minimize the chances for misclassification as “stroke-free.”All participants were given a questionnaire that included demographic variables (age, gender, and nationality). Histories of conventional risk factors (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and alcohol drinking) were also recorded. Blood pressure (BP) was measured using a standardized automated electronic sphygmomanometer (Omron, Dalian, China). Biochemical analyses were done using an automated enzymatic procedure (AU640, Olympus, Japan) in our central laboratory. After providing informed consent, 5 ml venous blood was obtained from each subject and kept at –20°C until analyzed.The work has been carried out in accordance with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments involving human subjects. Our procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of China Medical University, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.


### 2.2. SNP Selection and Genotyping

Genomic DNA was isolated from EDTA anticoagulated whole blood of subjects in the laboratory of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University using blood genomic DNA extraction kits according to the manufacturer’s protocol (TIANamp Genomic DNA kit, Tiangen Biochemical Technology, Beijing, China) and kept at −20°C until analyzed.The three selected SNPs for the present study were tag-SNPs selected from HapMap databases: rs7620580 (TTTGCTTGGTAGTGGTTGCATGTGC[A/G]TGTGTGCATGTGTGGACTGTCTGCT, Chromosome: 3: 124326456; Functional Consequence: intron variant), rs2289843 (AGGTGACATACATCTGAAATTTGTC[A/T]GCCTAAAAAGAACAAAGATAATAAT, Chromosome: 3:  124477247; Functional Consequence: synonymous codon) and rs1708303 (AGAATGGAGGCAAGTCCGAGTCCGT[A/G]GCCAACCTGCAGGCCCAGCCCTCCC, Chromosome: 3: 124632469; Functional Consequence: synonymous codon). The SNPs were to cover the genes of interest with anr2 threshold of 0.8 and minor allele frequency (MAF) greater than 0.1. Genotyping was done using the ligase detection reaction method (LDR-PCR) [18–20]. Primers were designed with primer 5 and probes were designed by Shanghai Generay Biotech (http://www.generay.com.cn/) (Table 1). Allele and genotype frequencies were determined by analyzing the raw data from ABI 3730XL with Peak Scanner Software v1.0 (ABI). About 10% randomly selected samples were genotyped repeatedly to ensure that the results were 100% concordant.Table 1
Primers and probes.
SNP
Primers
Probes
rs7620580
F: GGTAACTCTTGGTGACTTTGC
TA: TTTTTTTTTTGCTTGGTAGTGGTTGCATGTGCA
R: CATTCACCCCTTTGATCTGTG
TG: TTTTTTTTTTTTTGCTTGGTAGTGGTTGCATGTGCG
TR: -P-TGTGTGCATGTGTGGACTGTCTGCTTTTTTT-FAM-
rs2289843
F: CATTATGCCAAAGCAGAGAAG
TA: GGTGACATACATCTGAAATTTGTCA
R: TGGTGGACAGAAGGGAACAAC
TT: TTTGGTGACATACATCTGAAATTTGTCT
TR: -P-GCCTAAAAAGAACAAAGATAATAAT-FAM-
rs1708303
F: TTCTCTGGACTGGGGTCTACA
TA: TTTTGAATGGAGGCAAGTCCGAGTCCGTA
R: ACAGGACTCGTCAGCCACTTC
TG: TTTTTTTGAATGGAGGCAAGTCCGAGTCCGTG
TR: -P-GCCAACCTGCAGGCCCAGCCCTCCCTTT-FAM-


### 2.3. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were done using SPSS (v 13.0) and the SHEsis analysis platform (http://analysis.bio-x.cn/myAnalysis.php). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) with normal distribution by using the t-test. Count data are presented as number of cases and percentage. Pearson Chi-square (X2) tests or Fisher’s exact test were used to compare the frequencies of demographic variables and to assess differences in SNP genotypes and alleles between cases and controls. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was assessed using X2 tests. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined using unconditional logistic regression analysis. Multivariate analysis was evaluated by logistic regression models to test the association of gene variation and ischemic stroke risk after adjusting the confounding risk factors. The SHEsis analysis platform was used to calculate linkage disequilibrium indices (D′ andr2) and inferred haplotype frequencies [21, 22].


## 2.1. Subjects

A cohort of 747 individuals, including 385 ischemic stroke patients and 362 hypertensive controls without stroke, was included in the present study. The ischemic stroke group was composed of 297 patients found during the epidemiological survey of Fuxin rural areas (Liaoning province, China) [17] and 88 ischemic stroke patients from the First Hospital of China Medical University. The study subjects were unrelated to one another, were all Han Chinese, and were older than 35 years of age. Subjects were excluded if they had a history of hemorrhagic stroke, tumor, trauma, myocardial infarction, or atrial arrhythmia. All IS cases were confirmed to be atherosclerotic ischemic stroke by brain imaging using computed tomography (CT) scanning and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A diagnosis of IS was confirmed by 2 neurologists.The control group included unrelated individuals without any history or symptoms of cerebrovascular disease and were matched with the IS patients for residency area, ethnic origin, and gender. Brain imaging was not used for controls. As stroke is a late-onset disease, we selected older people as controls to minimize the chances for misclassification as “stroke-free.”All participants were given a questionnaire that included demographic variables (age, gender, and nationality). Histories of conventional risk factors (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and alcohol drinking) were also recorded. Blood pressure (BP) was measured using a standardized automated electronic sphygmomanometer (Omron, Dalian, China). Biochemical analyses were done using an automated enzymatic procedure (AU640, Olympus, Japan) in our central laboratory. After providing informed consent, 5 ml venous blood was obtained from each subject and kept at –20°C until analyzed.The work has been carried out in accordance with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments involving human subjects. Our procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of China Medical University, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.


## 2.2. SNP Selection and Genotyping

Genomic DNA was isolated from EDTA anticoagulated whole blood of subjects in the laboratory of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University using blood genomic DNA extraction kits according to the manufacturer’s protocol (TIANamp Genomic DNA kit, Tiangen Biochemical Technology, Beijing, China) and kept at −20°C until analyzed.The three selected SNPs for the present study were tag-SNPs selected from HapMap databases: rs7620580 (TTTGCTTGGTAGTGGTTGCATGTGC[A/G]TGTGTGCATGTGTGGACTGTCTGCT, Chromosome: 3: 124326456; Functional Consequence: intron variant), rs2289843 (AGGTGACATACATCTGAAATTTGTC[A/T]GCCTAAAAAGAACAAAGATAATAAT, Chromosome: 3:  124477247; Functional Consequence: synonymous codon) and rs1708303 (AGAATGGAGGCAAGTCCGAGTCCGT[A/G]GCCAACCTGCAGGCCCAGCCCTCCC, Chromosome: 3: 124632469; Functional Consequence: synonymous codon). The SNPs were to cover the genes of interest with anr2 threshold of 0.8 and minor allele frequency (MAF) greater than 0.1. Genotyping was done using the ligase detection reaction method (LDR-PCR) [18–20]. Primers were designed with primer 5 and probes were designed by Shanghai Generay Biotech (http://www.generay.com.cn/) (Table 1). Allele and genotype frequencies were determined by analyzing the raw data from ABI 3730XL with Peak Scanner Software v1.0 (ABI). About 10% randomly selected samples were genotyped repeatedly to ensure that the results were 100% concordant.Table 1
Primers and probes.
SNP
Primers
Probes
rs7620580
F: GGTAACTCTTGGTGACTTTGC
TA: TTTTTTTTTTGCTTGGTAGTGGTTGCATGTGCA
R: CATTCACCCCTTTGATCTGTG
TG: TTTTTTTTTTTTTGCTTGGTAGTGGTTGCATGTGCG
TR: -P-TGTGTGCATGTGTGGACTGTCTGCTTTTTTT-FAM-
rs2289843
F: CATTATGCCAAAGCAGAGAAG
TA: GGTGACATACATCTGAAATTTGTCA
R: TGGTGGACAGAAGGGAACAAC
TT: TTTGGTGACATACATCTGAAATTTGTCT
TR: -P-GCCTAAAAAGAACAAAGATAATAAT-FAM-
rs1708303
F: TTCTCTGGACTGGGGTCTACA
TA: TTTTGAATGGAGGCAAGTCCGAGTCCGTA
R: ACAGGACTCGTCAGCCACTTC
TG: TTTTTTTGAATGGAGGCAAGTCCGAGTCCGTG
TR: -P-GCCAACCTGCAGGCCCAGCCCTCCCTTT-FAM-


## 2.3. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were done using SPSS (v 13.0) and the SHEsis analysis platform (http://analysis.bio-x.cn/myAnalysis.php). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) with normal distribution by using the t-test. Count data are presented as number of cases and percentage. Pearson Chi-square (X2) tests or Fisher’s exact test were used to compare the frequencies of demographic variables and to assess differences in SNP genotypes and alleles between cases and controls. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was assessed using X2 tests. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined using unconditional logistic regression analysis. Multivariate analysis was evaluated by logistic regression models to test the association of gene variation and ischemic stroke risk after adjusting the confounding risk factors. The SHEsis analysis platform was used to calculate linkage disequilibrium indices (D′ andr2) and inferred haplotype frequencies [21, 22].


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Subject Characteristics

The demographic and clinical characteristics of the subjects were shown in Table2. There were no significant differences between cases and controls for gender, heart rate, or total cholesterol levels. Because we chose cases that were younger than controls, their mean ages were different (62.30 ± 9.75 versus 69.01 ± 7.32 years). As expected, the prevalence of the most common risk factors for atherosclerosis was significantly different between cases and controls: body mass index (BMI) (p=0.006), drinking (p=0.006), smoking (p=0.039), triglyceride (TG) (p=0.006), low density lipid cholesterol (LDL-C) (p<0.001), high density lipid cholesterol (HDL-C) (p<0.001), and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (p=0.035).Table 2
Study subjects’ characteristics.
Cases
Controls
p
Age (years)
62.30
±
9.75
69.01
±
7.32
<0.001
Gender (male/female,n)
219/166
209/153
0.814
Heart rate (bpm)
76.44
±
9.66
76.29
±
12.19
0.849
SBP (mmHg)
164.27
±
23.47
189.88
±
16.38
<0.001
DBP (mmHg)
95.70
±
14.47
102.32
±
13.00
<0.001
BMI (kg/m2)
24.10
±
3.71
23.29
±
4.16
0.006
Drinking (%)
95 (24.7%)
123 (34.0%)
0.006
Smoking (%)
156 (40.5%)
174 (48.1%)
0.039
CHOL (mmol/L)
5.35
±
1.05
5.40
±
1.03
0.499
TG (mmol/L)
1.89
±
1.47
1.62
±
1.17
0.006
LDL-C (mmol/L)
3.08
±
0.75
2.85
±
0.71
<0.001
HDL-C (mmol/L)
1.35
±
0.33
1.48
±
0.32
<0.001
FPG (mmol/L)
6.25
±
2.22
5.93
±
1.96
0.035
Note:n, number; SBP, systolic pressure; DBP, diastolic pressure; BMI, body mass index; TG, triglyceride; CHOL, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipid cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipid cholesterol; FPG, fasting plasma glucose.


### 3.2. Association between SNPs and Ischemic Stroke Risk

The genotype distributions and allelic frequencies for the 3 SNPs that we selected among cases and controls were shown in Tables3 and 4. All allele distributions of the studied SNPs were in HWE.Table 3
Genotype distributions and detailed association results.
Genotype
IS (n)
Control (n)
OR (95% CI)
p
OR (95% CI)∗
p
∗
rs7620580
AA
199
228
1.000
1.000
AG
166
122
1.559 (1.153–2.107)
0.004
1.534 (1.011–2.328)
0.045
GG
20
12
1.910 (0.911–4.004)
0.087
3.195 (1.228–8.312)
0.017
Recessive
1.598 (0.770–3.318)
0.208
2.686 (1.049–6.879)
0.039
Additive
1.490 (1.157–1.919)
0.002
1.636 (1.163–2.300)
0.005
Dominant
1.590 (1.187–2.130)
0.002
1.662 (1.110–2.487)
0.014
rs2289843
TT
101
107
1.000
1.000
TA
195
181
1.141 (0.813–1.602)
0.445
1.291 (0.809–2.059)
0.285
AA
89
74
1.274 (0.845–1.922)
0.248
1.402 (0.807–2.434)
0.231
Recessive
1.170 (0.826–1.658)
0.377
1.197 (0.748–1.914)
0.453
Additive
1.130 (0.920–1.386)
0.243
1.189 (0.903–1.566)
0.216
Dominant
1.180 (0.857–1.625)
0.311
1.326 (0.856–2.053)
0.206
rs1708303
AA
241
260
1.000
1.000
AG
132
94
1.515 (1.103–2.081)
0.010
1.610 (1.040–2.490)
0.033
GG
12
8
1.618 (0.650–4.027)
0.301
1.550 (0.484–4.969)
0.461
Recessive
1.424 (0.575–3.524)
0.445
1.338 (0.421–4.250)
0.622
Additive
1.438 (1.092–1.892)
0.010
1.476 (1.020–2.135)
0.039
Dominant
1.523 (1.119–2.073)
0.007
1.604 (1.051–2.447)
0.028
∗adjusted for age, SBP, DBP, FPG, TG, HDL, LDL, smoking, drinking, and BMI.Table 4
SNP allele frequencies in cases and controls.
Allele
Cases (n)
Controls (n)
OR (95% CI)
p
HWE P in controls
rs7620580
0.37
A allele
564
578
1
—
G allele
206
146
1.446 (1.136–1.841)
0.003
rs2289843
0.87
T allele
397
395
1
—
A allele
373
329
1.128 (0.920–1.382)
0.246
rs1708303
0.88
A allele
614
614
1
—
G allele
156
110
1.418 (1.084–1.855)
0.011For a dominant model, analyses were done by combining the heterozygous variant genotype with the homozygous variant genotype. For a recessive model, analyses were done by combining the heterozygous variant genotype with the wild type homozygous genotype. As shown in Table3, SNP rs7620580 (dominant model: OR = 1.590 (95% CI 1.187–2.130), p = 0.002; additive model: OR = 1.490 (95% CI 1.157–1.919), p = 0.002) and SNP rs1708303 (dominant model: OR = 1.523 (95% CI 1.119–2.073), p = 0.007; additive model: OR = 1.438 (95% CI 1.092–1.892), p = 0.01) were significantly associated with ischemic stroke in this population. The GG genotype and G allele of SNP rs7620580 were associated with a risk for ischemic stroke with an adjusted OR of 3.195 (95% CI 1.228–8.312, p=0.017) and OR of 1.446 (95% CI 1.136–1.841, p = 0.003), respectively (Tables 3 and 4). However, there were no significant differences in the allele and genotype distributions for SNP rs2289843 between cases and controls in total subjects.Because some conventional confounding risk factors may also contribute to the development of stroke, we analyzed the associations between these SNPs and IS after adjusting for these factors. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that, after adjusting for age, systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, BMI, smoking, drinking, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, and FPG, SNP rs7620580 (dominant model: OR = 1.662 (95% CI 1.110–2.487),p = 0.014; additive model: OR = 1.636 (95% CI 1.163–2.300), p=0.005; recessive model: OR = 2.686 (95% CI 1.049–6.879), p=0.039) and SNP rs1708303 (dominant model: OR = 1.604 (95% CI 1.051–2.447), p=0.028; additive model: OR = 1.476 (95% CI 1.020–2.135), p=0.039) still showed associations with ischemic stroke.We found an interaction between the gene variation and environment (Table5). So we also studied the association of theKALRN SNPs and IS under different environmental exposures, such as gender and overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) (Table 6). Genotypic association of SNP rs7620580 was also revealed in men before and after adjustment of covariates in the additive and dominant models. But in women, significant difference was present only after adjustment of covariates (additive model: OR = 1.804 (95% CI 1.032–3.152), p = 0.038, dominant model OR = 2.007 (95% CI 1.062–3.793), p = 0.032). The association of SNP rs1708303 and IS was present in women in the crude additive and dominant model (OR = 1.566 (95% CI 1.045–2.345), p = 0.030, and OR = 1.665 (95% CI 1.046–2.652), p = 0.032, resp.) but was lost after adjustment. No association of SNP rs1708303 and IS was found in men (p>0.05). SNP rs2289843 genotypes were associated with IS only in women after adjustment for covariates in recessive and additive model (OR = 2.186 (95% CI 1.035–4.620), p = 0.040, and OR = 1.658 (95% CI 1.059–2.595), p = 0.027, resp.). As shown in Table 6, the genotype distributions of rs7620580 and rs1708303 were also different between overweight subjects and nonoverweight subjects (BMI < 25 kg/m2). No genotypic association between SNP rs2289843 and IS was revealed in subjects with different BMI (p>0.05).Table 5
Interaction of three SNPs and environmental risk factors on IS.
Genotype
Gender
IS (n)
Control (n)
OR (95% CI)
p
rs7620580
AA
M
109
133
1
F
90
95
1.156 (0.788–1.697)
0.459
AA + AG
M
110
76
1.766 (1.200–2.600)
0.004
F
76
58
0.783 (0.434–1.415)
0.418
rs2289843
TT + TA
M
166
158
1
F
130
130
1.171 (0.822–1.668)
0.383
AA
M
53
51
0.954 (0.591–1.542)
0.849
F
36
23
1.736 (0.799–3.770)
0.163
rs1708303
AA
M
143
152
1
F
98
108
1.212 (0.823–1.784)
0.331
AA + AG
M
76
57
1.444 (0.928–2.247)
0.104
F
68
45
1.182 (0.607–2.303)
0.623
Genotype
Overweight
IS (n)
Control (n)
OR (95% CI)
p
rs7620580
AA
Null
129
176
Yes
69
52
1.839 (1.201–2.816)
0.005
AA + AG
Null
121
97
1.714 (1.206–2.437)
0.003
Yes
64
37
0.760 (0.399–1.450)
0.406
rs2289843
TT + TA
Null
197
220
Yes
97
68
1.601 (1.112–2.306)
0.011
AA
Null
53
53
1.080 (0.703–1.660)
0.725
Yes
36
21
1.113 (0.523–2.368)
0.782
rs1708303
AA
Null
152
193
Yes
88
67
1.679 (1.145–2.461)
0.008
AA + AG
Null
98
80
1.534 (1.065–2.210)
0.022
Yes
45
22
1.015 (0.503–2.051)
0.966
Genotype
Smoking
IS (n)
Control (n)
OR (95% CI)
p
rs7620580
AA
Null
117
117
Yes
82
111
0.739 (0.503–1.084)
0.122
AA + AG
Null
112
71
1.577 (1.065–2.336)
0.023
Yes
74
63
1.008 (0.559–1.819)
0.979
rs2289843
TT + TA
Null
177
159
Yes
119
129
1.062 (0.612–1.842)
0.832
AA
Null
52
29
1.486 (0.972–2.272)
0.068
Yes
37
45
0.599 (0.313–1.145)
0.121
rs1708303
AA
Null
145
133
Yes
96
127
0.693 (0.486–0.988)
0.043
AA + AG
Null
84
55
1.401 (0.926–2.118)
0.11
Yes
60
47
1.206 (0.647–2.246)
0.556
Genotype
Drinking
IS (n)
Control (n)
OR (95% CI)
p
rs7620580
AA
Null
146
153
Yes
53
75
0.741 (0.487–1.125)
0.159
AA + AG
Null
144
86
1.755 (1.236–2.491)
0.002
Yes
42
48
0.706 (0.370–1.347)
0.291
rs2289843
TT + TA
Null
224
194
Yes
72
94
0.777 (0.424–1.425)
0.415
AA
Null
66
45
1.286 (0.879–1.880)
0.195
Yes
23
29
0.757 (0.371–1.542)
0.443
rs1708303
AA
Null
182
168
yes
59
92
0.592 (0.401–0.873)
0.008
AA + AG
null
108
71
1.404 (0.974–2.024)
0.069
yes
36
31
1.29 (0.649–2.562)
0.468Table 6
Analysis of kalirin genotypic association with IS in subgroups.
rs7620580
Gender
Genotype
Woman
Man
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)∗
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)∗∗
AG
1.368 (0.866–2.162)
1.988 (1.035–3.816)
▲
1.723 (1.154–2.572)
▲▲
1.776 (1.096–2.877)
GG
1.583 (0.433–5.796)
2.236 (0.410–12.201)
2.135 (0.864–5.277)
3.661 (1.215–11.036)
Recessive
1.397 (0.387–5.048)
1.682 (0.319–8.876)
1.716 (0.704–4.179)
2.895 (0.982–8.541)
Additive
1.334 (0.896–1.987)
1.804 (1.032–3.152)
▲
1.608 (1.158–2.233)
▲▲
1.832 (1.235–2.719)
▲▲
Dominant
1.383 (0.884–2.163)
2.007 (1.062–3.793)
▲
1.766 (1.200–2.600)
▲▲
1.923 (1.206–3.067)
▲▲
BMI
Genotype
BMI< 25 kg/m2
BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)∗∗∗
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)∗∗∗∗
AA
1
1
1
1
AG
1.658 (1.157–2.377)
▲▲
1.598 (0.999–2.557)
1.302 (0.744–2.278)
1.966 (0.887–4.357)
GG
2.200 (0.866–5.462)
3.055 (0.918–10.166)
1.319 (0.367–4.744)
4.130 (0.858–19.874)
Recessive
1.802 (0.734–4.422)
2.565 (0.781–8.424)
1.181 (0.335–4.157)
3.105 (0.681–14.156)
Additive
1.593 (1.175–2.160)
▲▲
1.651 (1.112–2.451)
▲
1.236 (0.780–1.959)
1.999 (1.077–3.711)
▲
Dominant
1.703 (1.200–2.416)
▲▲
1.699 (1.077–2.680)
▲
1.304 (0.758–2.241)
2.188 (1.019–4.700)
▲
rs2289843
Gender
Genotype
Woman
Man
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)∗
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)∗∗
TT
1
1
1
1
TA
1.070 (0.643–1.779)
1.443 (0.687–3.033)
1.203 (0.763–1.895)
1.421 (0.825–2.446)
AA
1.635 (0.842–3.175)
2.782 (1.134–6.826)
▲
1.113 (0.656–1.891)
1.208 (0.645–2.264)
Recessive
1.565 (0.879–2.787)
2.186 (1.035–4.620)
▲
0.989 (0.636–1.539)
0.970 (0.573–1.642)
Additive
1.250 (0.903–1.730)
1.658 (1.059–2.595)
▲
1.059 (0.813–1.380)
1.108 (0.810–1.515)
Dominant
1.192 (0.734–1.936)
1.765 (0.872–3.570)
1.172 (0.765–1.796)
1.344 (0.810–2.231)
BMI
Genotype
BMI< 25kg/m2
BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)∗∗∗
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)∗∗∗∗
TT
1
1
1
1
TA
1.033 (0.692–1.541)
1.134 (0.678–1.897)
1.490 (0.782–2.839)
1.889 (0.733–4.866)
AA
1.129 (0.686–1.858)
1.370 (0.723–2.596)
1.548 (0.737–3.252)
1.569 (0.581–4.241)
Recessive
1.106 (0.722–1.693)
1.266 (0.730–2.197)
1.202 (0.646–2.236)
1.071 (0.474–2.420)
Additive
1.060 (0.827–1.357)
1.167 (0.850–1.602)
1.250 (0.860–1.817)
1.238 (0.754–2.034)
Dominant
1.059 (0.724–1.548)
1.197 (0.736–1.947)
1.510 (0.818–2.756)
1.741 (0.740–4.097)
rs1708303
Gender
Genotype
Woman
Man
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)∗
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)∗∗
AA
1
1
1
1
AG
1.613 (0.996–2.612)
1.663 (0.846–3.272)
1.444 (0.947–2.202)
1.497 (0.901–2.487)
GG
2.204 (0.644–7.548)
1.191 (0.236–6.015)
1.063 (0.261–4.330)
0.875 (0.168–4.564)
Recessive
1.886 (0.556–6.394)
1.020 (0.205–5.072)
0.953 (0.235–3.863)
0.778 (0.150–4.034)
Additive
1.566 (1.045–2.345)
▲
1.414 (0.809–2.470)
1.332 (0.914–1,941)
1.331 (0.848–2.090)
Dominant
1.665 (1.046–2.652)
▲
1.602 (0.837–3.068)
1.417 (0.938–2.141)
1.447 (0.881–2.374)
BMI
Genotype
BMI< 25 kg/m2
BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)∗∗∗
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)∗∗∗∗
AA
1
1
1
1
AG
1.590 (1.094–2.309)
▲
1.368 (0.841–2.227)
1.450 (0.783–2.686)
2.435 (1.003–5.912)
▲
GG
1.261 (0.433–3.674)
0.969 (0.248–3.781)
3.807 (0.434–33.355)
2.035 (0.164–25.291)
Recessive
1.086 (0.375–3.140)
0.880 (0.227–3.417)
3.437 (0.395–29.930)
1.651 (0.136–20.089)
Additive
1.431 (1.036–1.978)
▲
1.232 (0.813–1.867)
1.564 (0.912–2.683)
2.095 (0.962–4.562)
Dominant
1.561 (1.086–2.244)
▲
1.329 (0.829–2.131)
1.557 (0.854–2.840)
2.397 (1.018–5.644)
▲
∗adjusted for age, SBP, and drinking history in men; ∗∗adjusted for age, SBP, LDL-C, and smoking history in women; ∗∗∗adjusted for age, SBP, LDL-C, and smoking history in BMI < 25 kg/m2; ∗∗∗∗adjusted for age, SBP, LDL-C, and smoking history in BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2; p▲ < 0.05, p▲▲ < 0.01.Thus, we concluded that rs7620580, rs1708303, and rs2289843 polymorphisms may have been associated with a risk for the development of IS among Han Chinese (Table3).


### 3.3. Haplotype Analysis

We also analyzed haplotypes using SHEsis program platform. Haplotypes were constructed inKALRNbased on the three SNPs (rs7620580, rs2289843, and rs1708303). These 3 SNPs were in linkage disequilibrium in this study population (Figures 1 and 2). Of 8 possible haplotypes, only 6 had frequencies of >0.03 among both cases and controls and were included in our haplotype analysis (Table 7). The frequencies of the A–T–G and G-T-A haplotypes in cases were significantly higher than that in controls (12.0% versus 6.0%, p<0.001 and 11.0% versus 6.9%, p = 0.006, resp.). The frequencies of A-T-A haplotype in cases were significantly lower than those in controls (26.2% versus 38.3%,p < 0.001).Table 7
Haplotype analysis in cases and controls.
Haplotype
Cases (freq.)
Controls (freq.)
OR (95% CI)
p
A-T-A
202 (0.262)
281 (0.388)
0.557 (0.446~0.695)
<0.001
A-T-G
92 (0.120)
44 (0.060)
2.138 (1.467~3.115)
<0.001
A-A-A
242 (0.315)
219 (0.303)
1.064 (0.852~1.328)
0.585
A-A-G
28 (0.036)
35 (0.048)
0.745 (0.447~1.242)
0.257
G-T-A
84 (0.110)
50 (0.069)
1.661 (1.152~2.395)
0.006
G-A-A
85 (0.111)
64 (0.088)
1.295 (0.919~1.823)
0.139
All haplotypes with a frequency of < 0.03 were ignored for this analysis.Figure 1
D′ of the 3 SNPs: it showed that they were in linkage disequilibrium.Figure 2
r
2 of the 3 SNPs: it showed that they were in linkage disequilibrium.


## 3.1. Subject Characteristics

The demographic and clinical characteristics of the subjects were shown in Table2. There were no significant differences between cases and controls for gender, heart rate, or total cholesterol levels. Because we chose cases that were younger than controls, their mean ages were different (62.30 ± 9.75 versus 69.01 ± 7.32 years). As expected, the prevalence of the most common risk factors for atherosclerosis was significantly different between cases and controls: body mass index (BMI) (p=0.006), drinking (p=0.006), smoking (p=0.039), triglyceride (TG) (p=0.006), low density lipid cholesterol (LDL-C) (p<0.001), high density lipid cholesterol (HDL-C) (p<0.001), and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (p=0.035).Table 2
Study subjects’ characteristics.
Cases
Controls
p
Age (years)
62.30
±
9.75
69.01
±
7.32
<0.001
Gender (male/female,n)
219/166
209/153
0.814
Heart rate (bpm)
76.44
±
9.66
76.29
±
12.19
0.849
SBP (mmHg)
164.27
±
23.47
189.88
±
16.38
<0.001
DBP (mmHg)
95.70
±
14.47
102.32
±
13.00
<0.001
BMI (kg/m2)
24.10
±
3.71
23.29
±
4.16
0.006
Drinking (%)
95 (24.7%)
123 (34.0%)
0.006
Smoking (%)
156 (40.5%)
174 (48.1%)
0.039
CHOL (mmol/L)
5.35
±
1.05
5.40
±
1.03
0.499
TG (mmol/L)
1.89
±
1.47
1.62
±
1.17
0.006
LDL-C (mmol/L)
3.08
±
0.75
2.85
±
0.71
<0.001
HDL-C (mmol/L)
1.35
±
0.33
1.48
±
0.32
<0.001
FPG (mmol/L)
6.25
±
2.22
5.93
±
1.96
0.035
Note:n, number; SBP, systolic pressure; DBP, diastolic pressure; BMI, body mass index; TG, triglyceride; CHOL, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipid cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipid cholesterol; FPG, fasting plasma glucose.


## 3.2. Association between SNPs and Ischemic Stroke Risk

The genotype distributions and allelic frequencies for the 3 SNPs that we selected among cases and controls were shown in Tables3 and 4. All allele distributions of the studied SNPs were in HWE.Table 3
Genotype distributions and detailed association results.
Genotype
IS (n)
Control (n)
OR (95% CI)
p
OR (95% CI)∗
p
∗
rs7620580
AA
199
228
1.000
1.000
AG
166
122
1.559 (1.153–2.107)
0.004
1.534 (1.011–2.328)
0.045
GG
20
12
1.910 (0.911–4.004)
0.087
3.195 (1.228–8.312)
0.017
Recessive
1.598 (0.770–3.318)
0.208
2.686 (1.049–6.879)
0.039
Additive
1.490 (1.157–1.919)
0.002
1.636 (1.163–2.300)
0.005
Dominant
1.590 (1.187–2.130)
0.002
1.662 (1.110–2.487)
0.014
rs2289843
TT
101
107
1.000
1.000
TA
195
181
1.141 (0.813–1.602)
0.445
1.291 (0.809–2.059)
0.285
AA
89
74
1.274 (0.845–1.922)
0.248
1.402 (0.807–2.434)
0.231
Recessive
1.170 (0.826–1.658)
0.377
1.197 (0.748–1.914)
0.453
Additive
1.130 (0.920–1.386)
0.243
1.189 (0.903–1.566)
0.216
Dominant
1.180 (0.857–1.625)
0.311
1.326 (0.856–2.053)
0.206
rs1708303
AA
241
260
1.000
1.000
AG
132
94
1.515 (1.103–2.081)
0.010
1.610 (1.040–2.490)
0.033
GG
12
8
1.618 (0.650–4.027)
0.301
1.550 (0.484–4.969)
0.461
Recessive
1.424 (0.575–3.524)
0.445
1.338 (0.421–4.250)
0.622
Additive
1.438 (1.092–1.892)
0.010
1.476 (1.020–2.135)
0.039
Dominant
1.523 (1.119–2.073)
0.007
1.604 (1.051–2.447)
0.028
∗adjusted for age, SBP, DBP, FPG, TG, HDL, LDL, smoking, drinking, and BMI.Table 4
SNP allele frequencies in cases and controls.
Allele
Cases (n)
Controls (n)
OR (95% CI)
p
HWE P in controls
rs7620580
0.37
A allele
564
578
1
—
G allele
206
146
1.446 (1.136–1.841)
0.003
rs2289843
0.87
T allele
397
395
1
—
A allele
373
329
1.128 (0.920–1.382)
0.246
rs1708303
0.88
A allele
614
614
1
—
G allele
156
110
1.418 (1.084–1.855)
0.011For a dominant model, analyses were done by combining the heterozygous variant genotype with the homozygous variant genotype. For a recessive model, analyses were done by combining the heterozygous variant genotype with the wild type homozygous genotype. As shown in Table3, SNP rs7620580 (dominant model: OR = 1.590 (95% CI 1.187–2.130), p = 0.002; additive model: OR = 1.490 (95% CI 1.157–1.919), p = 0.002) and SNP rs1708303 (dominant model: OR = 1.523 (95% CI 1.119–2.073), p = 0.007; additive model: OR = 1.438 (95% CI 1.092–1.892), p = 0.01) were significantly associated with ischemic stroke in this population. The GG genotype and G allele of SNP rs7620580 were associated with a risk for ischemic stroke with an adjusted OR of 3.195 (95% CI 1.228–8.312, p=0.017) and OR of 1.446 (95% CI 1.136–1.841, p = 0.003), respectively (Tables 3 and 4). However, there were no significant differences in the allele and genotype distributions for SNP rs2289843 between cases and controls in total subjects.Because some conventional confounding risk factors may also contribute to the development of stroke, we analyzed the associations between these SNPs and IS after adjusting for these factors. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that, after adjusting for age, systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, BMI, smoking, drinking, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, and FPG, SNP rs7620580 (dominant model: OR = 1.662 (95% CI 1.110–2.487),p = 0.014; additive model: OR = 1.636 (95% CI 1.163–2.300), p=0.005; recessive model: OR = 2.686 (95% CI 1.049–6.879), p=0.039) and SNP rs1708303 (dominant model: OR = 1.604 (95% CI 1.051–2.447), p=0.028; additive model: OR = 1.476 (95% CI 1.020–2.135), p=0.039) still showed associations with ischemic stroke.We found an interaction between the gene variation and environment (Table5). So we also studied the association of theKALRN SNPs and IS under different environmental exposures, such as gender and overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) (Table 6). Genotypic association of SNP rs7620580 was also revealed in men before and after adjustment of covariates in the additive and dominant models. But in women, significant difference was present only after adjustment of covariates (additive model: OR = 1.804 (95% CI 1.032–3.152), p = 0.038, dominant model OR = 2.007 (95% CI 1.062–3.793), p = 0.032). The association of SNP rs1708303 and IS was present in women in the crude additive and dominant model (OR = 1.566 (95% CI 1.045–2.345), p = 0.030, and OR = 1.665 (95% CI 1.046–2.652), p = 0.032, resp.) but was lost after adjustment. No association of SNP rs1708303 and IS was found in men (p>0.05). SNP rs2289843 genotypes were associated with IS only in women after adjustment for covariates in recessive and additive model (OR = 2.186 (95% CI 1.035–4.620), p = 0.040, and OR = 1.658 (95% CI 1.059–2.595), p = 0.027, resp.). As shown in Table 6, the genotype distributions of rs7620580 and rs1708303 were also different between overweight subjects and nonoverweight subjects (BMI < 25 kg/m2). No genotypic association between SNP rs2289843 and IS was revealed in subjects with different BMI (p>0.05).Table 5
Interaction of three SNPs and environmental risk factors on IS.
Genotype
Gender
IS (n)
Control (n)
OR (95% CI)
p
rs7620580
AA
M
109
133
1
F
90
95
1.156 (0.788–1.697)
0.459
AA + AG
M
110
76
1.766 (1.200–2.600)
0.004
F
76
58
0.783 (0.434–1.415)
0.418
rs2289843
TT + TA
M
166
158
1
F
130
130
1.171 (0.822–1.668)
0.383
AA
M
53
51
0.954 (0.591–1.542)
0.849
F
36
23
1.736 (0.799–3.770)
0.163
rs1708303
AA
M
143
152
1
F
98
108
1.212 (0.823–1.784)
0.331
AA + AG
M
76
57
1.444 (0.928–2.247)
0.104
F
68
45
1.182 (0.607–2.303)
0.623
Genotype
Overweight
IS (n)
Control (n)
OR (95% CI)
p
rs7620580
AA
Null
129
176
Yes
69
52
1.839 (1.201–2.816)
0.005
AA + AG
Null
121
97
1.714 (1.206–2.437)
0.003
Yes
64
37
0.760 (0.399–1.450)
0.406
rs2289843
TT + TA
Null
197
220
Yes
97
68
1.601 (1.112–2.306)
0.011
AA
Null
53
53
1.080 (0.703–1.660)
0.725
Yes
36
21
1.113 (0.523–2.368)
0.782
rs1708303
AA
Null
152
193
Yes
88
67
1.679 (1.145–2.461)
0.008
AA + AG
Null
98
80
1.534 (1.065–2.210)
0.022
Yes
45
22
1.015 (0.503–2.051)
0.966
Genotype
Smoking
IS (n)
Control (n)
OR (95% CI)
p
rs7620580
AA
Null
117
117
Yes
82
111
0.739 (0.503–1.084)
0.122
AA + AG
Null
112
71
1.577 (1.065–2.336)
0.023
Yes
74
63
1.008 (0.559–1.819)
0.979
rs2289843
TT + TA
Null
177
159
Yes
119
129
1.062 (0.612–1.842)
0.832
AA
Null
52
29
1.486 (0.972–2.272)
0.068
Yes
37
45
0.599 (0.313–1.145)
0.121
rs1708303
AA
Null
145
133
Yes
96
127
0.693 (0.486–0.988)
0.043
AA + AG
Null
84
55
1.401 (0.926–2.118)
0.11
Yes
60
47
1.206 (0.647–2.246)
0.556
Genotype
Drinking
IS (n)
Control (n)
OR (95% CI)
p
rs7620580
AA
Null
146
153
Yes
53
75
0.741 (0.487–1.125)
0.159
AA + AG
Null
144
86
1.755 (1.236–2.491)
0.002
Yes
42
48
0.706 (0.370–1.347)
0.291
rs2289843
TT + TA
Null
224
194
Yes
72
94
0.777 (0.424–1.425)
0.415
AA
Null
66
45
1.286 (0.879–1.880)
0.195
Yes
23
29
0.757 (0.371–1.542)
0.443
rs1708303
AA
Null
182
168
yes
59
92
0.592 (0.401–0.873)
0.008
AA + AG
null
108
71
1.404 (0.974–2.024)
0.069
yes
36
31
1.29 (0.649–2.562)
0.468Table 6
Analysis of kalirin genotypic association with IS in subgroups.
rs7620580
Gender
Genotype
Woman
Man
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)∗
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)∗∗
AG
1.368 (0.866–2.162)
1.988 (1.035–3.816)
▲
1.723 (1.154–2.572)
▲▲
1.776 (1.096–2.877)
GG
1.583 (0.433–5.796)
2.236 (0.410–12.201)
2.135 (0.864–5.277)
3.661 (1.215–11.036)
Recessive
1.397 (0.387–5.048)
1.682 (0.319–8.876)
1.716 (0.704–4.179)
2.895 (0.982–8.541)
Additive
1.334 (0.896–1.987)
1.804 (1.032–3.152)
▲
1.608 (1.158–2.233)
▲▲
1.832 (1.235–2.719)
▲▲
Dominant
1.383 (0.884–2.163)
2.007 (1.062–3.793)
▲
1.766 (1.200–2.600)
▲▲
1.923 (1.206–3.067)
▲▲
BMI
Genotype
BMI< 25 kg/m2
BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)∗∗∗
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)∗∗∗∗
AA
1
1
1
1
AG
1.658 (1.157–2.377)
▲▲
1.598 (0.999–2.557)
1.302 (0.744–2.278)
1.966 (0.887–4.357)
GG
2.200 (0.866–5.462)
3.055 (0.918–10.166)
1.319 (0.367–4.744)
4.130 (0.858–19.874)
Recessive
1.802 (0.734–4.422)
2.565 (0.781–8.424)
1.181 (0.335–4.157)
3.105 (0.681–14.156)
Additive
1.593 (1.175–2.160)
▲▲
1.651 (1.112–2.451)
▲
1.236 (0.780–1.959)
1.999 (1.077–3.711)
▲
Dominant
1.703 (1.200–2.416)
▲▲
1.699 (1.077–2.680)
▲
1.304 (0.758–2.241)
2.188 (1.019–4.700)
▲
rs2289843
Gender
Genotype
Woman
Man
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)∗
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)∗∗
TT
1
1
1
1
TA
1.070 (0.643–1.779)
1.443 (0.687–3.033)
1.203 (0.763–1.895)
1.421 (0.825–2.446)
AA
1.635 (0.842–3.175)
2.782 (1.134–6.826)
▲
1.113 (0.656–1.891)
1.208 (0.645–2.264)
Recessive
1.565 (0.879–2.787)
2.186 (1.035–4.620)
▲
0.989 (0.636–1.539)
0.970 (0.573–1.642)
Additive
1.250 (0.903–1.730)
1.658 (1.059–2.595)
▲
1.059 (0.813–1.380)
1.108 (0.810–1.515)
Dominant
1.192 (0.734–1.936)
1.765 (0.872–3.570)
1.172 (0.765–1.796)
1.344 (0.810–2.231)
BMI
Genotype
BMI< 25kg/m2
BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)∗∗∗
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)∗∗∗∗
TT
1
1
1
1
TA
1.033 (0.692–1.541)
1.134 (0.678–1.897)
1.490 (0.782–2.839)
1.889 (0.733–4.866)
AA
1.129 (0.686–1.858)
1.370 (0.723–2.596)
1.548 (0.737–3.252)
1.569 (0.581–4.241)
Recessive
1.106 (0.722–1.693)
1.266 (0.730–2.197)
1.202 (0.646–2.236)
1.071 (0.474–2.420)
Additive
1.060 (0.827–1.357)
1.167 (0.850–1.602)
1.250 (0.860–1.817)
1.238 (0.754–2.034)
Dominant
1.059 (0.724–1.548)
1.197 (0.736–1.947)
1.510 (0.818–2.756)
1.741 (0.740–4.097)
rs1708303
Gender
Genotype
Woman
Man
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)∗
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)∗∗
AA
1
1
1
1
AG
1.613 (0.996–2.612)
1.663 (0.846–3.272)
1.444 (0.947–2.202)
1.497 (0.901–2.487)
GG
2.204 (0.644–7.548)
1.191 (0.236–6.015)
1.063 (0.261–4.330)
0.875 (0.168–4.564)
Recessive
1.886 (0.556–6.394)
1.020 (0.205–5.072)
0.953 (0.235–3.863)
0.778 (0.150–4.034)
Additive
1.566 (1.045–2.345)
▲
1.414 (0.809–2.470)
1.332 (0.914–1,941)
1.331 (0.848–2.090)
Dominant
1.665 (1.046–2.652)
▲
1.602 (0.837–3.068)
1.417 (0.938–2.141)
1.447 (0.881–2.374)
BMI
Genotype
BMI< 25 kg/m2
BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)∗∗∗
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)∗∗∗∗
AA
1
1
1
1
AG
1.590 (1.094–2.309)
▲
1.368 (0.841–2.227)
1.450 (0.783–2.686)
2.435 (1.003–5.912)
▲
GG
1.261 (0.433–3.674)
0.969 (0.248–3.781)
3.807 (0.434–33.355)
2.035 (0.164–25.291)
Recessive
1.086 (0.375–3.140)
0.880 (0.227–3.417)
3.437 (0.395–29.930)
1.651 (0.136–20.089)
Additive
1.431 (1.036–1.978)
▲
1.232 (0.813–1.867)
1.564 (0.912–2.683)
2.095 (0.962–4.562)
Dominant
1.561 (1.086–2.244)
▲
1.329 (0.829–2.131)
1.557 (0.854–2.840)
2.397 (1.018–5.644)
▲
∗adjusted for age, SBP, and drinking history in men; ∗∗adjusted for age, SBP, LDL-C, and smoking history in women; ∗∗∗adjusted for age, SBP, LDL-C, and smoking history in BMI < 25 kg/m2; ∗∗∗∗adjusted for age, SBP, LDL-C, and smoking history in BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2; p▲ < 0.05, p▲▲ < 0.01.Thus, we concluded that rs7620580, rs1708303, and rs2289843 polymorphisms may have been associated with a risk for the development of IS among Han Chinese (Table3).


## 3.3. Haplotype Analysis

We also analyzed haplotypes using SHEsis program platform. Haplotypes were constructed inKALRNbased on the three SNPs (rs7620580, rs2289843, and rs1708303). These 3 SNPs were in linkage disequilibrium in this study population (Figures 1 and 2). Of 8 possible haplotypes, only 6 had frequencies of >0.03 among both cases and controls and were included in our haplotype analysis (Table 7). The frequencies of the A–T–G and G-T-A haplotypes in cases were significantly higher than that in controls (12.0% versus 6.0%, p<0.001 and 11.0% versus 6.9%, p = 0.006, resp.). The frequencies of A-T-A haplotype in cases were significantly lower than those in controls (26.2% versus 38.3%,p < 0.001).Table 7
Haplotype analysis in cases and controls.
Haplotype
Cases (freq.)
Controls (freq.)
OR (95% CI)
p
A-T-A
202 (0.262)
281 (0.388)
0.557 (0.446~0.695)
<0.001
A-T-G
92 (0.120)
44 (0.060)
2.138 (1.467~3.115)
<0.001
A-A-A
242 (0.315)
219 (0.303)
1.064 (0.852~1.328)
0.585
A-A-G
28 (0.036)
35 (0.048)
0.745 (0.447~1.242)
0.257
G-T-A
84 (0.110)
50 (0.069)
1.661 (1.152~2.395)
0.006
G-A-A
85 (0.111)
64 (0.088)
1.295 (0.919~1.823)
0.139
All haplotypes with a frequency of < 0.03 were ignored for this analysis.Figure 1
D′ of the 3 SNPs: it showed that they were in linkage disequilibrium.Figure 2
r
2 of the 3 SNPs: it showed that they were in linkage disequilibrium.


## 4. Discussion

In this study, we investigated possible associations between 3 polymorphisms of theKALRN gene and ischemic stroke in a northern Chinese Han population. We found that SNP rs7620580, rs2289843, and rs1708303 were associated with IS and revealed that the G allele of SNP rs7620580 and G allele of SNP rs1708303 were risk factors for IS. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that these three SNPs were associated with the occurrence of ischemic stroke in Chinese population.Age and hypertension are independent risk factors for stroke. As with other atherosclerotic diseases, stroke is a late-onset disease. Susceptibility genes can influence an early-onset of this disease when environmental factors have not had sufficient time to modify the phenotype. Several studies of theMTHFR andapolipoprotein E genes [23],PDE4D genes [24], and variations on chromosome 9p21 [25] have shown age-dependent effects. Thus, we selected place of residence and sex-matched, older, and higher blood pressure patients without stroke as controls to minimize the chances of misclassification as “stroke-free” and to exclude the impact of hypertension in the control group.The protein encoded for by theKALRN gene is a complex protein with multiple catalytic, protein-protein, and protein-lipid interaction domains. It is involved in neuron morphogenesis [9, 10] and granule maturation [26, 27] and modifies synphilin-1 aggregate transport and formation [11]. Kalirin 7 is the most abundant isoform of kalirin in the adult brain that is nearly exclusively localized to the postsynaptic density (PSD) [28, 29] and plays an essential role in dendritic spine formation and function [30–33]. Kalirin 7 is also involved in ischemic signal transduction [34]. Nitric oxide (NO) acts as a neurotransmitter. Kalirin inhibits inducible nitric-oxide synthase (iNOS) activity [35] and promotes SMC migration and proliferation both in vitro and in vivo [12]. Kalirin’s RhoGEF activity could plausibly augment atherogenesis by enhancing vascular SMC proliferation and migration [12, 36–38] and endothelial dysfunction [39].TheKALRN gene has been linked to schizophrenia [40, 41] and adult attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder [42]. Recent studies found thatKALRN gene variations were associated with atherosclerotic diseases, such as coronary heart disease [13, 15] and stroke [43, 44], whereas Olsson et al. [45] found no linkage. These differences may have been due to the different ethnic groups that were studied. Different IS risk factors may also affect the results of association study. As we have shown in Table 6, the associations were presented in man or thinner subjects, while they disappeared in woman or overweight ones. So the difference of our study and Olsson’s may have been also due to different risk factors of the study subjects. Besides genetic and environmental backgrounds, differences in sample size, population admixture, and different selection criteria may explain the discrepancy, too.The studied SNPs rs1708303 and rs2289843 were located in exons. We found that an intronic locus SNP rs7620580 was associated with IS, too. Perhaps polymorphisms in the intron region are in linkage disequilibrium with unidentified variants in regulatory elements, which affect gene transcription rates or gene expression efficiency. It is possible that an intron SNP interferes with nucleotide splicing or the formation of different spliceosomes, which might change gene structure and influence protein folding.There were several limitations for our study. First, our subjects were selected from the rural elderly patients in Northern China during an epidemiological investigation; the conclusion may not represent populations of other genetic background. Further large-scale, randomized, long-term studies from different regions and ethnic or social background will be needed to confirm our present findings. Second, one of our selected SNPs (rs 7620580) was located in introns, the function of which was not clear. Third, because stroke is a disease that might involve multiple SNPs among multiple genes, a comprehensive analysis of the interactions between candidate genes will be more powerful than a single-locus analysis. Finally, functional studies are needed to confirm our findings from this study.


## 5. Conclusions

Our results provide evidence thatKALRN gene variations were associated with ischemic stroke in the Chinese Han population.



---

*Source: 6594271-2017-06-19.xml*