# Antiobesity Effect of a Novel Herbal FormulationLI85008F in High-Fat Diet-Induced Obese Mice

Authors: Hak Joo Choi; Hwa Young Kim; Kyoung Sik Park
Journal: Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

A variety of natural products have been explored for their antiobesity potential and widely used to develop dietary supplements for the prevention of weight gain from excess body fat. In an attempt to find a natural antiobesity agent, this study was designed to evaluate the antiobesity activity of a novel herbal formulationLI85008F composed of extracts from three medicinal plants in high-fat diet- (HFD-) induced obese mice. After the thirteen-week oral administration of the test materials to mice, the body weight gain, whole-body fat mass, adipose tissue weight, and the expression levels of obesity-related proteins were measured. Our results indicated that LI85008F can suppress body weight gain and lower whole-body fat mass in HFD-induced obese mice. Significant decreases in epididymal and retroperitoneal fat mass were observed in LI85008F-treated groups compared with the HFD-fed control group (p<0.05). Furthermore, the oral administration of LI85008F caused significant decreases in the expression level of adipogenic (C/EBPα and PPARγ) and lipogenic (ACC) markers and notable increases in the production level of thermogenetic (AMPKα, PGC1α and UCP1) and lipolytic (HSL) proteins. These findings suggest that LI85008F holds great promise for a novel herbal formulation with antiobesity activities, preventing body fat accumulation and altering lipid metabolism.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Obesity is a challenging health problem caused by the interaction of various genetic, dietary, lifestyle, and environmental factors [1]. The comorbidities associated with obesity include diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases. Excess weight also has an enormous impact on the social, financial, and psychological status of obese individuals, which may contribute to the development of depression [2].There are a variety of choices for obesity treatment, including life style changes, exercise, dietary control, weight-loss surgery, and prescription weight-loss medications [3]. Medications can facilitate weight loss in obese persons. The first class of medications developed for weight control causes symptoms that mimic the sympathetic nervous system, resulting in the major side effect of this class of medications as high blood pressure. These medications also lower appetite and increase a sensation of fullness. Another class of antiobesity medications suppresses appetite by increasing the concentration of neurotransmitters at the synaptic cleft, where hunger and fullness are regulated by brain neurotransmitters such as dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine [4]. Unfortunately, these weight-loss medications are known to have significant adverse effects including headache, insomnia, irritability, nervousness, abdominal pain, and diarrhea [5, 6]. In the face of adverse effects of synthetic drugs, the potential of natural products with antiobesity activity is under exploration [7]. Natural products including crude extracts and isolated pure natural compounds may serve as antiobesity agents via a variety of mechanisms including suppression of adipose tissue growth, inhibition of adipocyte differentiation, stimulation of lipolysis, and induction of apoptosis in existing adipocytes, thereby reducing adipose tissue mass [8].LI85008F is composed of the extracts of three medicinal plants, Moringa oleifera, Murraya koenigii, and Curcuma longa. These medicinal plants were selected by screening hundreds of traditional herbal extracts for their ability to inhibit adipogenesis using a cell-based model [9]. Moringa oleifera, also known as drumstick tree, is indigenous to South Asia and India, and its leaves are highly nutritious and rich in amino acids, vitamins, minerals, and natural antioxidants [10]. The leaves of the plant have been traditionally used in the diet and for the treatment of various inflammatory-mediated diseases including cardiovascular diseases and diabetes [11]. Murraya koenigii, known as curry leaf, is used in folk medicine in India and other Asian countries as an analgesic, astringent, antidysenteric, febrifuge, hypolipidemic and hypoglycemic agent [12]. Turmeric (Curcuma longa) has a long tradition of being used as a spice by many cultures across the globe. This commonly consumed spice possesses antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, anticancer, antigrowth, antiarthritic, antiaging, antiatherosclerotic, antidepressant, antidiabetic, antimicrobial, wound healing, and memory‐enhancing activities [13]. In traditional Indian medicine, turmeric has also been used to treat different ailments such as gynecological problems, gastric problems, hepatic disorders, infectious diseases, blood disorders, acne, psoriasis, dermatitis, rash, and other chronic ailments [14].Although these spices have not traditionally been used for weight loss, the combination ofM. oleifera, M. koenigii, and C. longa has been clinically shown to support body weight and fat loss in both obese and overweight individuals in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial [15]. In addition, Sengupta et al. [9] describe putative mechanisms for activity of this combination in modulating adipogenesis and lipolysis. The present study aimed to further investigate the antiobesity potential of LI85008F in a high-fat diet- (HFD-) induced obese mouse model.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Test Material

LI85008F, manufactured by Laila Nutraceuticals (Vijayawada, India) and provided by Ju Yeong NS Co., LTD. (Seoul, South Korea), is a novel herbal formulation composed of an aqueous ethanol extract of Moringa oleifera leaves, an aqueous alcohol extract of Murrya koenigii leaves, and Curcuma longa rhizome extract standardized to 95% total curcuminoids, mixed at a ratio of 6 : 3 : 1, respectively. Fresh plant raw materials were collected from local areas in Andhra Pradesh, India. Their voucher specimens are preserved in the Taxonomy Division at Laila Impex R & D Centre (Vijayawada, India). LI85008F is commercially available as Slendacor® or Slimvance®.


### 2.2. Animals and Experimental Diets

Four-week-old male C57BL/6 mice (Raonbio, Yongin, South Korea) were maintained under a 12-hour light-dark cycle in a temperature- and humidity-controlled room during the experimental period. The mice were given laboratory pellet chow and waterad libitum. Following one week of acclimatization, 20 mice were randomly divided based on their body weight into four groups (n = 5) as follows: the normal group received a chow diet (ENVIGO, Huntingdon, UK); the control group was fed with a 60 kcal% fat high-fat diet (HFD; Research Diet Inc, Burnswick, USA); and the two experimental groups were provided with a HFD supplemented with 250 and 500 mg/kg of LI85008F, respectively. Mice allocated to the experimental groups were orally administered with LI85008F for 13 weeks. The body weight and feed consumption of each mouse were measured once a week and daily throughout the study duration, respectively. All animal care and use protocols following NIH guidelines were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Daejeon University (approval No. DJUARB2020-003).


### 2.3. Determination of Body Fat Mass

The body fat mass of mice was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with an apparatus for small animals (Inalyzer, Medicors Inc., Seongnam, Korea). All scans were performed with the animals positioned prone and spread, with tape attached to each limb on the platform. The fat mass percentage was calculated as fat mass divided by total body weight and multiplied by 100.


### 2.4. Sampling Procedures

At the end of the 13-wk experimental phase, mice fasted overnight were anesthetized and sacrificed. The adipose tissues (epididymal and retroperitoneal fat pad) were harvested, weighed immediately, and stored at −80°C until further analysis.


### 2.5. Western Blot Analysis

Protein from each retroperitoneal fat sample was extracted with RIPA lysis and extraction buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, USA) at 4°C. Then, the extracts were centrifuged at 13,200 r/min and 4°C for 30 min, and the supernatants of these tissues were used for western blotting analyses. The protein samples were separated on 10% SDS-PAGE gels and electrophoretically transferred onto PVDF membranes. The membranes were blocked at room temperature with 5% nonfat dry milk in TBST for 1 h and then incubated overnight at 4°C with the indicated primary antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, USA) as follows: AMP-activated protein kinaseα (AMPKα; 1 : 100), acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC; 1 : 1,000), uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1; 1 : 1,000), CCAAT/enhancer binding protein α (C/EBPα; 1 : 1,000), hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL; 1 : 1,000), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator 1α (PGC1α) (1 : 1,000), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ; 1 : 1,000), and β-actin (1 : 2,000). After washing three times with TBST, the blots were hybridized with secondary antibodies (1 : 10,000) conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. The proteins were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, USA) and analyzed using a Chemi-doc (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, USA).


### 2.6. Statistical Analysis

The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 21.0 (SPSS, Chicago, USA). The differences among groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Duncan’s test. Significance was set atp<0.05 for all statistical analyses.


## 2.1. Test Material

LI85008F, manufactured by Laila Nutraceuticals (Vijayawada, India) and provided by Ju Yeong NS Co., LTD. (Seoul, South Korea), is a novel herbal formulation composed of an aqueous ethanol extract of Moringa oleifera leaves, an aqueous alcohol extract of Murrya koenigii leaves, and Curcuma longa rhizome extract standardized to 95% total curcuminoids, mixed at a ratio of 6 : 3 : 1, respectively. Fresh plant raw materials were collected from local areas in Andhra Pradesh, India. Their voucher specimens are preserved in the Taxonomy Division at Laila Impex R & D Centre (Vijayawada, India). LI85008F is commercially available as Slendacor® or Slimvance®.


## 2.2. Animals and Experimental Diets

Four-week-old male C57BL/6 mice (Raonbio, Yongin, South Korea) were maintained under a 12-hour light-dark cycle in a temperature- and humidity-controlled room during the experimental period. The mice were given laboratory pellet chow and waterad libitum. Following one week of acclimatization, 20 mice were randomly divided based on their body weight into four groups (n = 5) as follows: the normal group received a chow diet (ENVIGO, Huntingdon, UK); the control group was fed with a 60 kcal% fat high-fat diet (HFD; Research Diet Inc, Burnswick, USA); and the two experimental groups were provided with a HFD supplemented with 250 and 500 mg/kg of LI85008F, respectively. Mice allocated to the experimental groups were orally administered with LI85008F for 13 weeks. The body weight and feed consumption of each mouse were measured once a week and daily throughout the study duration, respectively. All animal care and use protocols following NIH guidelines were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Daejeon University (approval No. DJUARB2020-003).


## 2.3. Determination of Body Fat Mass

The body fat mass of mice was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with an apparatus for small animals (Inalyzer, Medicors Inc., Seongnam, Korea). All scans were performed with the animals positioned prone and spread, with tape attached to each limb on the platform. The fat mass percentage was calculated as fat mass divided by total body weight and multiplied by 100.


## 2.4. Sampling Procedures

At the end of the 13-wk experimental phase, mice fasted overnight were anesthetized and sacrificed. The adipose tissues (epididymal and retroperitoneal fat pad) were harvested, weighed immediately, and stored at −80°C until further analysis.


## 2.5. Western Blot Analysis

Protein from each retroperitoneal fat sample was extracted with RIPA lysis and extraction buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, USA) at 4°C. Then, the extracts were centrifuged at 13,200 r/min and 4°C for 30 min, and the supernatants of these tissues were used for western blotting analyses. The protein samples were separated on 10% SDS-PAGE gels and electrophoretically transferred onto PVDF membranes. The membranes were blocked at room temperature with 5% nonfat dry milk in TBST for 1 h and then incubated overnight at 4°C with the indicated primary antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, USA) as follows: AMP-activated protein kinaseα (AMPKα; 1 : 100), acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC; 1 : 1,000), uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1; 1 : 1,000), CCAAT/enhancer binding protein α (C/EBPα; 1 : 1,000), hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL; 1 : 1,000), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator 1α (PGC1α) (1 : 1,000), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ; 1 : 1,000), and β-actin (1 : 2,000). After washing three times with TBST, the blots were hybridized with secondary antibodies (1 : 10,000) conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. The proteins were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, USA) and analyzed using a Chemi-doc (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, USA).


## 2.6. Statistical Analysis

The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 21.0 (SPSS, Chicago, USA). The differences among groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Duncan’s test. Significance was set atp<0.05 for all statistical analyses.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Effect ofLI85008F on Body Weight Gain

The body weight and food intake of each mouse were measured on a weekly and daily basis throughout the study duration, respectively. Distinct separation can be seen from week 3 onwards, whereby the control group which received high-fat diet (HFD) revealed a remarkable increase in body weight when compared with the normal group fed with a regular diet, implying the induction of obesity in animals in the control group. From week 6 onwards, daily administration of test articleLI85008F at the dose of each of 250 and 500 mg/kg significantly prevented the body weight gain in both LI85008F-treated groups (control: 17.08 ± 2.53 vs. LI85008F 250 : 10.78 ± 4.39, p<0.05; LI85008F 500 : 9.37 ± 2.95, p<0.05) (Figure 1).Figure 1
The effect ofLI85008F on weekly body weight (a) and body weight gain (b) in mice for 13 weeks of treatment. Values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 5). The data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test. # and ∗ indicate the significant difference (p<0.05) between normal vs. control group and control vs. LI85008F supplemented group, respectively.
(a)(b)


### 3.2. Effect ofLI85008F on Whole-Body Fat Mass

To determine whether the observed decrease in body weight by treatment ofLI85008F was due to a reduced accumulation of fat, we estimated whole-body fat mass by conducting dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry(DXA) with an apparatus for small animals (Figure 2).Figure 2
Representative images from DXA scans for mice in each group after 13 weeks of treatment.The mice in the control group had a significant higher whole-body fat mass at the end of the 13-wk intervention period than in mice fed with a regular diet. In contrast, the daily oral administration of the test materialLI85008F at the dose of each of 250 and 500 mg/kg resulted in a significantly reduced whole-body fat mass compared to that of the control group (control: 16.20 ± 3.18 vs. LI85008F 250 : 11.51 ± 2.16, p<0.05; LI85008F 500 : 11.19 ± 2.63, p<0.05) (Figure 3(a)). In addition, the fat mass percentage was calculated as fat mass divided by total body weight. In parallel with whole-body fat mass, significant decreases in fat mass percentage were found in mice treated with LI85008F at the dose of 500 mg/kg compared with the control group (control: 36.90 ± 2.95 vs. LI85008F 500 : 31.07 ± 6.20, p<0.05) (Figure 3(b)).Figure 3
The effect ofLI85008F on whole-body fat mass (a) and fat mass percentage (b) in mice for 13 weeks of treatment. Values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 5). The data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test. # and ∗ indicate the significant difference (p<0.05) between normal vs. control group and control vs. LI85008F supplemented group, respectively.
(a)(b)


### 3.3. Effect ofLI85008F on Fat Mass of Adipose Tissue

After daily administration of test articleLI85008F for 13 weeks, mice fed with HFD exhibited a significant increase in both the epididymal and retroperitoneal fat pad weights in comparison with the normal group. A significant decrease in epididymal fat pad weight was observed in all animals that received LI85008F at the dose of 250 mg/kg or 500 mg/kg for 13 weeks in a dose-dependent manner in comparison with the control group (control: 2.03 ± 0.16 vs. LI85008F 250 : 1.70 ± 0.37, p<0.05; LI85008F 500 : 1.20 ± 0.21, p<0.05) (Figure 4(a)). In retroperitoneal fat pad weight, there was a significant reduction in the group receiving 500 mg/kg of LI85008F compared to the control group (control: 0.68 ± 0.12 vs. LI85008F 500 : 0.45 ± 0.08, p<0.05) (Figure 4(b)).Figure 4
The effect ofLI85008F on epididymal (a) and retroperitoneal fat pad weight (b) in mice for 13 weeks of treatment. Values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 5). The data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test. # and ∗ indicate the significant difference (p<0.05) between normal vs. control group and control vs. LI85008F supplemented group, respectively.
(a)(b)


### 3.4. Effect ofLI85008F on the Expression of Adipogenic and Lipogenic Markers in Adipose Tissue

To further elucidate the mechanism underlying the blockade of fat accumulation byLI85008F supplementation, the expression of the key markers of adipogenesis C/EBPα and PPARγ in retroperitoneal fat pads was examined by western blot analysis. The adipogenesis process is tightly controlled by C/EBPα, which promotes the adipogenic pathway through activation of PPARγ [16]. As shown in Figure 5(a), the expression of these two adipogenic markers was suppressed in LI85008F-treated mice compared to HFD-fed control mice. Moreover, the production level of a key lipogenic enzyme, ACC, which is regulated by C/EBPα or PPARγ [17], was measured. The intake of LI85008F for 13 weeks significantly decreased the expression level of ACC in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 5(b)).Figure 5
The effect ofLI85008F on the expression level of adipogenic (a) and lipogenic markers (b) in retroperitoneal fat pads of mice for 13 weeks of treatment. Specific bands were quantified and are presented as bar graphs. Values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 5). The data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test. # and ∗ indicate the significant difference (p<0.05) between normal vs. control group and control vs. LI85008F supplemented group, respectively.
(a)(b)


### 3.5. Effect ofLI85008F on the Expression of Thermogenetic and Lipolytic Markers in Adipose Tissue

It has been reported that phosphorylation of AMPKα triggers the induction of gene expression of thermogenesis markers PGC1α and UCP1 [18]. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of LI85008F supplementation on the expression level of AMPKα, PGC1α, and UCP1 in retroperitoneal fat pads of HFD-fed mice. The oral administration of LI85008F for 13 weeks significantly up-regulated the production level of AMPKα, PGC1α, and UCP1 in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 6(a)). In addition, the alterations in the production level of lipase HSL involved in lipolysis by LI85008F intake were also investigated. LI85008F-treated mice showed higher protein expression of HSL than HFD-fed control mice (Figure 6(b), implying that LI85008F can be acting on the lipolytic pathway in HFD-induced obese mice.Figure 6
The effect ofLI85008F on the expression level of thermogenetic (a) and lipolytic markers (b) in retroperitoneal fat pads of mice for 13 weeks of treatment. Specific bands were quantified and are presented as bar graphs. Values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 5). The data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test. # and ∗ indicate the significant difference (p<0.05) between normal vs. control group and control vs. LI85008F supplemented group, respectively.
(a)(b)Obesity can be defined as an increase in body weight beyond the limits of physical requirements, which results from an excessive accumulation of fat. Interestingly, in a previous clinical study [15], LI85008F supplementation for 8 weeks resulted in a significant body weight reduction in overweight or obese adults compared to those in the placebo group (p<0.001), which is parallel with the suppressive effect of LI85008F on HFD-induced body weight gain in mice observed in this study (Figure 1). Furthermore, we have shown that LI85008F treatment significantly reduces whole-body fat mass and fat mass percentage using DXA (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)), most likely through the inhibition of fat accumulation in adipose tissue including epididymal and retroperitoneal fat pads (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). The current study demonstrated that LI85008F suppressed adipogenesis and decreased lipid accumulation by inhibiting the expression of genes involved in adipogenesis and lipogenesis in adipose tissue (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)), which is consistent with the previous report [9] that LI85008F deactivates the key adipogenic transcription factors C/EBPα and PPARγ in 3T3-L1 adipocytes.As a master energy sensor, AMPK plays a key role in integrating hormones, nutrients, and stress signals to maintain whole-body energy homeostasis [19]. AMPK is activated by allosteric stimulation in response to an increased AMP/ATP ratio or mitochondria activity changes [20]. In skeletal and cardiac muscle, AMPK activation leads to the induction of gene expression of thermogenesis markers PGC1α and UCP1 [18]. In the present study, we demonstrated that LI85008F supplementation elevated AMPKα production level and induced the subsequent activation of PGC1α and UCP1 expression, leading to higher energy expenditure and lower body weight (Figure 6(a)). HSL, the major enzyme catabolizing triglycerides (TGs), induces lipolysis after phosphorylation of serine residues, leading to translocation of itself to the lipid droplets and markedly enhancing lipolysis [21]. As shown in Figure 6(b), LI85008F treatment to HFD-induced obese mice led to upregulate the expression of HSL involved in lipolysis pathways.Based on these findings, we propose thatLI85008F exerts antiobesity activities through a variety of mechanisms including suppression of adipogenesis, inhibition of lipogenesis, stimulation of lipolysis, and upregulation of thermogenesis and energy expenditure in adipose tissue, thereby reducing adipose tissue mass, whole-body fat mass, and body weight gain in HFD-induced obese mice.


## 3.1. Effect ofLI85008F on Body Weight Gain

The body weight and food intake of each mouse were measured on a weekly and daily basis throughout the study duration, respectively. Distinct separation can be seen from week 3 onwards, whereby the control group which received high-fat diet (HFD) revealed a remarkable increase in body weight when compared with the normal group fed with a regular diet, implying the induction of obesity in animals in the control group. From week 6 onwards, daily administration of test articleLI85008F at the dose of each of 250 and 500 mg/kg significantly prevented the body weight gain in both LI85008F-treated groups (control: 17.08 ± 2.53 vs. LI85008F 250 : 10.78 ± 4.39, p<0.05; LI85008F 500 : 9.37 ± 2.95, p<0.05) (Figure 1).Figure 1
The effect ofLI85008F on weekly body weight (a) and body weight gain (b) in mice for 13 weeks of treatment. Values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 5). The data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test. # and ∗ indicate the significant difference (p<0.05) between normal vs. control group and control vs. LI85008F supplemented group, respectively.
(a)(b)


## 3.2. Effect ofLI85008F on Whole-Body Fat Mass

To determine whether the observed decrease in body weight by treatment ofLI85008F was due to a reduced accumulation of fat, we estimated whole-body fat mass by conducting dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry(DXA) with an apparatus for small animals (Figure 2).Figure 2
Representative images from DXA scans for mice in each group after 13 weeks of treatment.The mice in the control group had a significant higher whole-body fat mass at the end of the 13-wk intervention period than in mice fed with a regular diet. In contrast, the daily oral administration of the test materialLI85008F at the dose of each of 250 and 500 mg/kg resulted in a significantly reduced whole-body fat mass compared to that of the control group (control: 16.20 ± 3.18 vs. LI85008F 250 : 11.51 ± 2.16, p<0.05; LI85008F 500 : 11.19 ± 2.63, p<0.05) (Figure 3(a)). In addition, the fat mass percentage was calculated as fat mass divided by total body weight. In parallel with whole-body fat mass, significant decreases in fat mass percentage were found in mice treated with LI85008F at the dose of 500 mg/kg compared with the control group (control: 36.90 ± 2.95 vs. LI85008F 500 : 31.07 ± 6.20, p<0.05) (Figure 3(b)).Figure 3
The effect ofLI85008F on whole-body fat mass (a) and fat mass percentage (b) in mice for 13 weeks of treatment. Values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 5). The data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test. # and ∗ indicate the significant difference (p<0.05) between normal vs. control group and control vs. LI85008F supplemented group, respectively.
(a)(b)


## 3.3. Effect ofLI85008F on Fat Mass of Adipose Tissue

After daily administration of test articleLI85008F for 13 weeks, mice fed with HFD exhibited a significant increase in both the epididymal and retroperitoneal fat pad weights in comparison with the normal group. A significant decrease in epididymal fat pad weight was observed in all animals that received LI85008F at the dose of 250 mg/kg or 500 mg/kg for 13 weeks in a dose-dependent manner in comparison with the control group (control: 2.03 ± 0.16 vs. LI85008F 250 : 1.70 ± 0.37, p<0.05; LI85008F 500 : 1.20 ± 0.21, p<0.05) (Figure 4(a)). In retroperitoneal fat pad weight, there was a significant reduction in the group receiving 500 mg/kg of LI85008F compared to the control group (control: 0.68 ± 0.12 vs. LI85008F 500 : 0.45 ± 0.08, p<0.05) (Figure 4(b)).Figure 4
The effect ofLI85008F on epididymal (a) and retroperitoneal fat pad weight (b) in mice for 13 weeks of treatment. Values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 5). The data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test. # and ∗ indicate the significant difference (p<0.05) between normal vs. control group and control vs. LI85008F supplemented group, respectively.
(a)(b)


## 3.4. Effect ofLI85008F on the Expression of Adipogenic and Lipogenic Markers in Adipose Tissue

To further elucidate the mechanism underlying the blockade of fat accumulation byLI85008F supplementation, the expression of the key markers of adipogenesis C/EBPα and PPARγ in retroperitoneal fat pads was examined by western blot analysis. The adipogenesis process is tightly controlled by C/EBPα, which promotes the adipogenic pathway through activation of PPARγ [16]. As shown in Figure 5(a), the expression of these two adipogenic markers was suppressed in LI85008F-treated mice compared to HFD-fed control mice. Moreover, the production level of a key lipogenic enzyme, ACC, which is regulated by C/EBPα or PPARγ [17], was measured. The intake of LI85008F for 13 weeks significantly decreased the expression level of ACC in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 5(b)).Figure 5
The effect ofLI85008F on the expression level of adipogenic (a) and lipogenic markers (b) in retroperitoneal fat pads of mice for 13 weeks of treatment. Specific bands were quantified and are presented as bar graphs. Values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 5). The data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test. # and ∗ indicate the significant difference (p<0.05) between normal vs. control group and control vs. LI85008F supplemented group, respectively.
(a)(b)


## 3.5. Effect ofLI85008F on the Expression of Thermogenetic and Lipolytic Markers in Adipose Tissue

It has been reported that phosphorylation of AMPKα triggers the induction of gene expression of thermogenesis markers PGC1α and UCP1 [18]. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of LI85008F supplementation on the expression level of AMPKα, PGC1α, and UCP1 in retroperitoneal fat pads of HFD-fed mice. The oral administration of LI85008F for 13 weeks significantly up-regulated the production level of AMPKα, PGC1α, and UCP1 in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 6(a)). In addition, the alterations in the production level of lipase HSL involved in lipolysis by LI85008F intake were also investigated. LI85008F-treated mice showed higher protein expression of HSL than HFD-fed control mice (Figure 6(b), implying that LI85008F can be acting on the lipolytic pathway in HFD-induced obese mice.Figure 6
The effect ofLI85008F on the expression level of thermogenetic (a) and lipolytic markers (b) in retroperitoneal fat pads of mice for 13 weeks of treatment. Specific bands were quantified and are presented as bar graphs. Values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 5). The data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test. # and ∗ indicate the significant difference (p<0.05) between normal vs. control group and control vs. LI85008F supplemented group, respectively.
(a)(b)Obesity can be defined as an increase in body weight beyond the limits of physical requirements, which results from an excessive accumulation of fat. Interestingly, in a previous clinical study [15], LI85008F supplementation for 8 weeks resulted in a significant body weight reduction in overweight or obese adults compared to those in the placebo group (p<0.001), which is parallel with the suppressive effect of LI85008F on HFD-induced body weight gain in mice observed in this study (Figure 1). Furthermore, we have shown that LI85008F treatment significantly reduces whole-body fat mass and fat mass percentage using DXA (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)), most likely through the inhibition of fat accumulation in adipose tissue including epididymal and retroperitoneal fat pads (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). The current study demonstrated that LI85008F suppressed adipogenesis and decreased lipid accumulation by inhibiting the expression of genes involved in adipogenesis and lipogenesis in adipose tissue (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)), which is consistent with the previous report [9] that LI85008F deactivates the key adipogenic transcription factors C/EBPα and PPARγ in 3T3-L1 adipocytes.As a master energy sensor, AMPK plays a key role in integrating hormones, nutrients, and stress signals to maintain whole-body energy homeostasis [19]. AMPK is activated by allosteric stimulation in response to an increased AMP/ATP ratio or mitochondria activity changes [20]. In skeletal and cardiac muscle, AMPK activation leads to the induction of gene expression of thermogenesis markers PGC1α and UCP1 [18]. In the present study, we demonstrated that LI85008F supplementation elevated AMPKα production level and induced the subsequent activation of PGC1α and UCP1 expression, leading to higher energy expenditure and lower body weight (Figure 6(a)). HSL, the major enzyme catabolizing triglycerides (TGs), induces lipolysis after phosphorylation of serine residues, leading to translocation of itself to the lipid droplets and markedly enhancing lipolysis [21]. As shown in Figure 6(b), LI85008F treatment to HFD-induced obese mice led to upregulate the expression of HSL involved in lipolysis pathways.Based on these findings, we propose thatLI85008F exerts antiobesity activities through a variety of mechanisms including suppression of adipogenesis, inhibition of lipogenesis, stimulation of lipolysis, and upregulation of thermogenesis and energy expenditure in adipose tissue, thereby reducing adipose tissue mass, whole-body fat mass, and body weight gain in HFD-induced obese mice.


## 4. Conclusions

The present study demonstrated thatL185008F administration for 13 weeks significantly suppressed HFD-induced body weight gain and reduced whole-body fat mass, as well as fat weight of adipose tissue including epididymal and retroperitoneal fat in HFD-induced obese mice. These findings may be associated with significant decreases in the expression level of adipogenesis and lipogenesis proteins including C/EBPα, PPARγ, and ACC, as well as marked upregulation in the production level of thermogenesis and lipolysis markers such as AMPKα, PGC1α, UCP1, and HSL induced by L185008F treatment in HFD-induced obese mice.



---

*Source: 6612996-2021-02-09.xml*