# Biomineralization Performance ofBacillus sphaericus under the Action of Bacillus mucilaginosus

Authors: Yingying Hu; Weitao Liu; Wenjing Wang; Xinlei Jia; Lanjuan Xu; Qing Cao; Jianjun Shen; Xiangming Hu
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

Microbial Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) is a biochemical process widely found in nature, also known as microbial mineralization. This paper investigates whether this process can help promote the intelligent reinforcement and repair of underground projects such as mines and tunnels. We selectedBacillus sphaericus and Bacillus mucilaginosus as the research objects. The former has an outstanding urease production ability, and the latter can secrete carbonic anhydrase in vitro. Bacillus mucilaginosus was introduced into the culture solution of Bacillus sphaericus in the most suitable culture environment, and the changes of mineralization rate and mineralization yield of Bacillus sphaericus were observed and analyzed. The results revealed that, to maintain the highest growth rate of Bacillus sphaericus, the optimal pH value was between 7 and 8, the optimal urea concentration was 0.5 mol/L, the optimal Ca2+ concentration was 0.6 mol/L, and the optimal Luria-Bertani (LB) culture concentration was 20 g/L. The amount of biomineralized calcium carbonate precipitated in the double bacteria solution can reach 1.89 times the amount of the precipitation in the Bacillus sphaericus solution under the same conditions. It concludes that the introduction of Bacillus mucilaginosus can effectively increase the mineralization yield of Bacillus sphaericus without affecting the mineralized products.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Mineralization is a general term for the process of converting organic compounds into inorganic compounds in soil under the action of soil microorganisms. The mineralization studied in this paper is the ability ofBacillus sphaericus to produce calcium carbonate. Specifically, Bacillus sphaericus can secrete urease, and the latter is capable of decomposing urea to form carbonate. The generated carbonate is then combined with calcium ions in the environment to form calcium carbonate.Mineralization has a wide range of applications in engineering practice [1–6]. For instance, the use of microbial mineralization can achieve self-repair of cracks in cement materials such as concrete. Currently, the feasibility of microbial remediation technology has been verified in engineering and other engineering fields. Scholars such as Belie of Ghent University in Belgium and Jonkers of Delft University in the Netherlands have successfully implemented microbial cemented sand to repair structural surface cracks [7, 8]. Bang and Ramakrishnan [9] found that microbial enzymatic action can promote the precipitation of calcium carbonate, and they also studied how to use microbes to repair cracks on the surface of cement-based materials. Carlos et al. [10] studied the microbial repair of cracks in decorative limestone surfaces. Okwadha and Li [11] explored the microbial repair of cracks on the surface of tunnels. However, it remains a challenge to apply the microbial mineralization and remediation technology to the repair of rock mass fractures under complex geological conditions such as mining [12–15]. One of the challenges is to improve the timeliness and effectiveness of microbial induced calcium carbonate deposition. The current research has been dramatically restricted in the crack repair width. For example, according to the experiments of Wang et al. [16], the upper limit of the concrete crack that can be repaired by Bacillus sphaericus is 0.17 mm. Studies have shown that Bacillus mucilaginosus can secrete carbonic anhydrase (CA), and CA has the property of accelerating the hydration of CO2 to form HCO3− [17]. As such, it is possible that Bacillus mucilaginosus will exert an influence on the deposition of calcium carbonate under natural conditions. Zhou [18] confirmed this conjecture by studying the role of Bacillus mucilaginosus and carbonic anhydrase in the formation and growth of calcium carbonate crystals. That being said, studies on the effects of carbonic anhydrase on microbial induced calcium carbonate deposition have not been reported.Priya et al. [19] evaluated the mechanical and durability properties of high strength concrete specimens by incorporating an alternative for cement and bacteria for healing cracks. Reddy and Revathi [20] developed a durable cement concrete by combining varying proportions of Bacillus sphaericus bacteria in crack filling and strength enhancement through biomineralization. To create environment-friendly biocement materials, Choi et al. [21, 22] studied the effect of PVA fibers and biocement in improving the engineering properties of the silica sand. Yu et al. [23–26] presented a series of experiments to select the optimal formulation of a new biocement that can convert ammonia into cementitious materials. They think that loose quartz sand grains can well be cemented by microbially induced barium phosphate precipitation into a sand column. However, there are few research on the application of biotechnology in the mine leakage stoppage technology.To sum up, this paper studies the biomineralization performance ofBacillus sphaericus under the action of carbonic anhydrase, based on the biochemical theory of microbial mineralization and diagenesis. This work provides a theoretical basis for the engineering application of microbial natural mineralization and water control. It also offers a new technology for the prevention and control of water inrush. Meanwhile, due to the advantages of microbial remediation technology, such as good remediation effect, green environmental protection than other traditional remediation materials, the use of microbial induced deposition of carbonate for seepage control and leakage stoppage has gradually become an important research direction of microbial remediation technology. However, it is necessary to apply the microbial mineralization remediation technology to the rock fracture seepage resistance under the adverse conditions such as mining and study the mechanism of microbial impermeability. Therefore, the optimization research of calcium carbonate deposition becomes more and more urgent.With the intelligent development trend of concrete materials, the application value of microbial mineralization self-repair technology has become increasingly prominent. Through the sensitive and automatic sensing of cracks by microorganisms, automatic detection and intelligent repair of cracks can be realized. Accordingly, the structural damage caused by crack propagation can be avoided [27–35]. Furthermore, the natural dormancy and reproduction of microorganisms can promote the sustainability of this intelligent repair. At present, the urgent problem to be solved in microbial intelligent repair research is how to speed up the formation of microbial mineralization products and how to increase the production of calcium carbonate. Given this, this paper selected Bacillus sphaericus as the research object and explored the effects of carbonic anhydrase, pH, Ca2+, and urea concentration on its mineralization performance.Additionally, we adopted the SEM, XRD, FTIR, and TG-DSC analysis methods to investigate the crystal structure and microstructure of microbial minerals rapidly formed after the introduction of carbonic anhydrase. We hope to increase the yield and rate of calcium carbonate precipitation without affecting the crystal structure of calcium carbonate and ultimately improve the efficiency of microbial repair of cracks. On the other hand, in order to further study the mineralization performance, we tried to addBacillus mucilaginosus based on the above experiments to study the mineralization under the action of double bacteria. In the experiment, we obtained the urease activity by testing the conductivity and acquired the amount of bacterial growth by testing the optical density (OD) value.


## 2. Experiments and Materials

### 2.1.Bacillus sphaericus Inoculation

As the start of our experiments, we performed theBacillus sphaericus inoculation as follows:(1)
Weigh 5 g of LB medium and 3 g of agar powder, pour it into an Erlenmeyer flask containing 200 ml of distilled water, stir well, and seal it.(2)
Sterilize the conical flask in a high-temperature sterilizer for 30 minutes (with a temperature of 121°C). After one and a half hours, remove the sterilized conical flask and place it in the ultraclean workbench. Turn on the ultraviolet (UV) lamp and fan to cool down.(3)
After cooling, turn off the UV lamp and fan, and then turn on the light. After disinfecting the hands with alcohol, ignite the alcohol lamp, and open the conical flask. Burn the bottle mouth and the stopper over the flame of the alcohol lamp, pick a small amount of the bacteria from the solid medium colony of the plate by the inoculating loop, and place it in a conical flask liquid medium. Slightly swing the inoculating loop to disperse the cells in the liquid medium. As such, the inoculation was completed and cultured in a constant temperature shaking incubator.


### 2.2. Factors Affecting the Growth ofBacillus sphaericus

In this section, to find the most suitable culture environment forBacillus sphaericus, we will explore the effects of five factors on Bacillus sphaericus, namely, pH value, urea concentration, Ca2+ concentration, calcium source, and LB nutrient solution concentration.


#### 2.2.1. Effect of pH Value

We prepared 1300 mL liquid medium, among which 1200 mL was evenly distributed in 6 Erlenmeyer flasks with the pH values sequentially adjusted to 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, respectively. After sterilization, they were inoculated on a clean bench, and the inoculum was 1% of the volume of the medium. We then put them in an incubator for shake culture. After 24 hours, the OD value at different pH was measured by a microplate reader. The experimental results are shown in Figure1.Figure 1
Effects of pH value onBacillus sphaericus.From Figure1, the optimal pH value of the growth environment of Bacillus sphaericus is 7, and the growth activity is also high when the pH value is 8.


#### 2.2.2. Effects of Urea Concentration

We prepared 1500 mL liquid medium, among which 1400 mL was evenly distributed in 7 Erlenmeyer flasks, and the pH was adjusted to 8. After sterilization, we added the urea solution prepared by filtration and sterilization method to the seven flakes of the medium, respectively. The concentrations were 0 mol/L, 0.25 mol/L, 0.5 mol/L, 0.75 mol/L, 1.0 mol/L, 1.25 mol/L, and 1.5 mol/L, respectively. We then inoculated on a clean bench, with the medium volume of 1%. The culture was shaken at a temperature of 28°C, and the OD value at different urea concentrations was measured after 24 h. Figure2 demonstrates the experimental results.Figure 2
Effects of urea concentration onBacillus sphaericus.As shown in Figure2, although 0 mol/L urea concentration had the highest OD value, considering the necessity of urea for the bacterium’s optimum biomineralization condition, the optimal urea concentration should be adjusted to 0.5 mol/L.


#### 2.2.3. Effects of Ca2+ Concentration

We prepared 1100 mL of liquid medium and evenly distributed 1000 mL in 5 Erlenmeyer flasks. Next, we added anhydrous calcium chloride of 0 g (0 mol/L), 22.2 g (0.20 mol/L), 44.4 g (0.40 mol/L), 66.6 g (0.60 mol/L), 88.8 g (0.80 mol/L), and 111 g (1.00 mol/L) to the Erlenmeyer flask. The pH value was adjusted to 8. After sterilization, we inoculated the medium on a clean bench, and the inoculum was 1% of the volume of the medium. The mediums were shaken at a temperature of 28°C, and the OD values at different Ca2+ concentrations were measured after 24 h. The experimental results are revealed in Figure 3.Figure 3
Effects of Ca2+ concentration on Bacillus sphaericus.As illustrated in Figure3, the best concentration of Ca2+ is 0.6 mol/L.


#### 2.2.4. Effects of LB Nutrient Solution Concentration

LB medium was prepared at a concentration of 5 g/L, 10 g/L, 15 g/L, 20 g/L, 25 g/L, and 30 g/L, respectively, and the pH was adjusted to 8. After sterilization, the medium was inoculated on a clean bench at an amount of 1% of the medium volume. After inoculation, the inoculated medium was cultured by shaking at a temperature of 28°C. The OD value at different LB concentrations was measured after 24 h, with the results shown in Figure4.Figure 4
Effects of LB nutrient solution concentration onBacillus sphaericus.As shown in Figure4, the optimal LB nutrient solution concentration is 20 g/L.


### 2.3. Effect of pH on Enzyme Activity of Double Bacteria Solution

After we completed the bacterial culture, we measured the activity of urease in the bacterial liquid to determine whether the bacterial liquid meets the test requirements. In this paper, the conductivity of the enzyme was measured by a conductivity meter. We first prepared four bottles ofBacillus sphaericus with pH values of 7, 8, 9, and 10, respectively. Then, 25 ml of Bacillus mucilaginosus solution was added to each bottle of the bacterial solution and cultured for 24 hours. Meanwhile, as a comparison, we prepared four bottles of Bacillus sphaericus liquid with pH values of 7, 8, 9, and 10, respectively. Before the measurement, we prepared 90 mL of urea solution with a concentration of 1.1 mol/L. We pipetted 10 mL of the tested bacteria into the urea solution and mixed them evenly afterward. After immersing the electrode in the urea solution for calibration, we tested the change in the conductivity of the solution with conductivity meter within 5 min (the urease activity of the bacterial solution is the average change in conductivity multiplied by the dilution factor of the bacterial solution).The experimental results showed that when the pH value increases from 7 to 10, the conductivity change values ofBacillus sphaericus added with Bacillus mucilaginosus were 0.20 ms/cm, 0.21 ms/cm, 0.19 ms/cm, 0.17 ms/cm, and 0.17 ms/cm, respectively. In the comparison group without added Bacillus, the conductivity changes were 0.18 ms/cm, 0.25 ms/cm, 0.19 ms/cm, and 0.20 ms/cm, respectively. The above data confirmed that Bacillus sphaericus produced the highest enzyme activity when pH value equals 8 in both cases.


### 2.4. Mineralization under the Action ofBacillus mucilaginosus

In order to study the effect of mineralization on the introduction ofBacillus mucilaginosus, we first inoculated Bacillus sphaericus in six bottles of a liquid medium with 100 ml per bottle. At the same time, we inoculated Bacillus mucilaginosus in 100 ml of liquid medium for culture. After the inoculated medium was placed in a constant temperature shaking incubator at 31°C for 24 h, we took out the Bacillus mucilaginosus solution and added them into the previously prepared 5 bottles of Bacillus sphaericus with the percentage of 10 : 1, 8 : 1, 6 : 1, 4 : 1, and 2 : 1, respectively. After that, they were further incubated with the blank comparison group for 24 hours. Figure 5 illustrates the experimental process.Figure 5
Mineralization process withBacillus mucilaginosus added.
(a)(b)(c)(d)After 24 hours of mixed culture, we took out six bottles of bacteria and centrifuged them by a centrifuge. In the centrifugation process, both anhydrous ethanol and distilled water were added three times. After that, we took out the lower layer of the centrifuge tube and dried it in a glass Petri dish. The experimental results show that when the ratio ofBacillus mucilaginosus and Bacillus sphaericus is 1 : 6, the deposition of calcium carbonate is the highest, as shown in Figure 6. The amount of calcium carbonate formed when Bacillus mucilaginosus was added in a ratio of 1 : 6 was 0.852 g; in contrast, under the same conditions, the amount of calcium carbonate precipitated by Bacillus globosa was only 0.451 g. Experiments reveal that Bacillus mucilaginosus can coexist with Bacillus sphaericus and continuously secrete carbonic anhydrase in vitro. Carbonic anhydrase can accelerate the combination of carbonate ions and calcium ions to promote the formation of calcium carbonate and effectively increase the yield of Bacillus sphaericus mineralization products. In other words, Bacillus mucilaginosus can significantly improve the rate of crack repair together with Bacillus sphaericus.Figure 6
Comparison of the amount of calcium carbonate with (a) and without (b)Bacillus mucilaginosus.
(a)(b)


## 2.1.Bacillus sphaericus Inoculation

As the start of our experiments, we performed theBacillus sphaericus inoculation as follows:(1)
Weigh 5 g of LB medium and 3 g of agar powder, pour it into an Erlenmeyer flask containing 200 ml of distilled water, stir well, and seal it.(2)
Sterilize the conical flask in a high-temperature sterilizer for 30 minutes (with a temperature of 121°C). After one and a half hours, remove the sterilized conical flask and place it in the ultraclean workbench. Turn on the ultraviolet (UV) lamp and fan to cool down.(3)
After cooling, turn off the UV lamp and fan, and then turn on the light. After disinfecting the hands with alcohol, ignite the alcohol lamp, and open the conical flask. Burn the bottle mouth and the stopper over the flame of the alcohol lamp, pick a small amount of the bacteria from the solid medium colony of the plate by the inoculating loop, and place it in a conical flask liquid medium. Slightly swing the inoculating loop to disperse the cells in the liquid medium. As such, the inoculation was completed and cultured in a constant temperature shaking incubator.


## 2.2. Factors Affecting the Growth ofBacillus sphaericus

In this section, to find the most suitable culture environment forBacillus sphaericus, we will explore the effects of five factors on Bacillus sphaericus, namely, pH value, urea concentration, Ca2+ concentration, calcium source, and LB nutrient solution concentration.


### 2.2.1. Effect of pH Value

We prepared 1300 mL liquid medium, among which 1200 mL was evenly distributed in 6 Erlenmeyer flasks with the pH values sequentially adjusted to 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, respectively. After sterilization, they were inoculated on a clean bench, and the inoculum was 1% of the volume of the medium. We then put them in an incubator for shake culture. After 24 hours, the OD value at different pH was measured by a microplate reader. The experimental results are shown in Figure1.Figure 1
Effects of pH value onBacillus sphaericus.From Figure1, the optimal pH value of the growth environment of Bacillus sphaericus is 7, and the growth activity is also high when the pH value is 8.


### 2.2.2. Effects of Urea Concentration

We prepared 1500 mL liquid medium, among which 1400 mL was evenly distributed in 7 Erlenmeyer flasks, and the pH was adjusted to 8. After sterilization, we added the urea solution prepared by filtration and sterilization method to the seven flakes of the medium, respectively. The concentrations were 0 mol/L, 0.25 mol/L, 0.5 mol/L, 0.75 mol/L, 1.0 mol/L, 1.25 mol/L, and 1.5 mol/L, respectively. We then inoculated on a clean bench, with the medium volume of 1%. The culture was shaken at a temperature of 28°C, and the OD value at different urea concentrations was measured after 24 h. Figure2 demonstrates the experimental results.Figure 2
Effects of urea concentration onBacillus sphaericus.As shown in Figure2, although 0 mol/L urea concentration had the highest OD value, considering the necessity of urea for the bacterium’s optimum biomineralization condition, the optimal urea concentration should be adjusted to 0.5 mol/L.


### 2.2.3. Effects of Ca2+ Concentration

We prepared 1100 mL of liquid medium and evenly distributed 1000 mL in 5 Erlenmeyer flasks. Next, we added anhydrous calcium chloride of 0 g (0 mol/L), 22.2 g (0.20 mol/L), 44.4 g (0.40 mol/L), 66.6 g (0.60 mol/L), 88.8 g (0.80 mol/L), and 111 g (1.00 mol/L) to the Erlenmeyer flask. The pH value was adjusted to 8. After sterilization, we inoculated the medium on a clean bench, and the inoculum was 1% of the volume of the medium. The mediums were shaken at a temperature of 28°C, and the OD values at different Ca2+ concentrations were measured after 24 h. The experimental results are revealed in Figure 3.Figure 3
Effects of Ca2+ concentration on Bacillus sphaericus.As illustrated in Figure3, the best concentration of Ca2+ is 0.6 mol/L.


### 2.2.4. Effects of LB Nutrient Solution Concentration

LB medium was prepared at a concentration of 5 g/L, 10 g/L, 15 g/L, 20 g/L, 25 g/L, and 30 g/L, respectively, and the pH was adjusted to 8. After sterilization, the medium was inoculated on a clean bench at an amount of 1% of the medium volume. After inoculation, the inoculated medium was cultured by shaking at a temperature of 28°C. The OD value at different LB concentrations was measured after 24 h, with the results shown in Figure4.Figure 4
Effects of LB nutrient solution concentration onBacillus sphaericus.As shown in Figure4, the optimal LB nutrient solution concentration is 20 g/L.


## 2.2.1. Effect of pH Value

We prepared 1300 mL liquid medium, among which 1200 mL was evenly distributed in 6 Erlenmeyer flasks with the pH values sequentially adjusted to 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, respectively. After sterilization, they were inoculated on a clean bench, and the inoculum was 1% of the volume of the medium. We then put them in an incubator for shake culture. After 24 hours, the OD value at different pH was measured by a microplate reader. The experimental results are shown in Figure1.Figure 1
Effects of pH value onBacillus sphaericus.From Figure1, the optimal pH value of the growth environment of Bacillus sphaericus is 7, and the growth activity is also high when the pH value is 8.


## 2.2.2. Effects of Urea Concentration

We prepared 1500 mL liquid medium, among which 1400 mL was evenly distributed in 7 Erlenmeyer flasks, and the pH was adjusted to 8. After sterilization, we added the urea solution prepared by filtration and sterilization method to the seven flakes of the medium, respectively. The concentrations were 0 mol/L, 0.25 mol/L, 0.5 mol/L, 0.75 mol/L, 1.0 mol/L, 1.25 mol/L, and 1.5 mol/L, respectively. We then inoculated on a clean bench, with the medium volume of 1%. The culture was shaken at a temperature of 28°C, and the OD value at different urea concentrations was measured after 24 h. Figure2 demonstrates the experimental results.Figure 2
Effects of urea concentration onBacillus sphaericus.As shown in Figure2, although 0 mol/L urea concentration had the highest OD value, considering the necessity of urea for the bacterium’s optimum biomineralization condition, the optimal urea concentration should be adjusted to 0.5 mol/L.


## 2.2.3. Effects of Ca2+ Concentration

We prepared 1100 mL of liquid medium and evenly distributed 1000 mL in 5 Erlenmeyer flasks. Next, we added anhydrous calcium chloride of 0 g (0 mol/L), 22.2 g (0.20 mol/L), 44.4 g (0.40 mol/L), 66.6 g (0.60 mol/L), 88.8 g (0.80 mol/L), and 111 g (1.00 mol/L) to the Erlenmeyer flask. The pH value was adjusted to 8. After sterilization, we inoculated the medium on a clean bench, and the inoculum was 1% of the volume of the medium. The mediums were shaken at a temperature of 28°C, and the OD values at different Ca2+ concentrations were measured after 24 h. The experimental results are revealed in Figure 3.Figure 3
Effects of Ca2+ concentration on Bacillus sphaericus.As illustrated in Figure3, the best concentration of Ca2+ is 0.6 mol/L.


## 2.2.4. Effects of LB Nutrient Solution Concentration

LB medium was prepared at a concentration of 5 g/L, 10 g/L, 15 g/L, 20 g/L, 25 g/L, and 30 g/L, respectively, and the pH was adjusted to 8. After sterilization, the medium was inoculated on a clean bench at an amount of 1% of the medium volume. After inoculation, the inoculated medium was cultured by shaking at a temperature of 28°C. The OD value at different LB concentrations was measured after 24 h, with the results shown in Figure4.Figure 4
Effects of LB nutrient solution concentration onBacillus sphaericus.As shown in Figure4, the optimal LB nutrient solution concentration is 20 g/L.


## 2.3. Effect of pH on Enzyme Activity of Double Bacteria Solution

After we completed the bacterial culture, we measured the activity of urease in the bacterial liquid to determine whether the bacterial liquid meets the test requirements. In this paper, the conductivity of the enzyme was measured by a conductivity meter. We first prepared four bottles ofBacillus sphaericus with pH values of 7, 8, 9, and 10, respectively. Then, 25 ml of Bacillus mucilaginosus solution was added to each bottle of the bacterial solution and cultured for 24 hours. Meanwhile, as a comparison, we prepared four bottles of Bacillus sphaericus liquid with pH values of 7, 8, 9, and 10, respectively. Before the measurement, we prepared 90 mL of urea solution with a concentration of 1.1 mol/L. We pipetted 10 mL of the tested bacteria into the urea solution and mixed them evenly afterward. After immersing the electrode in the urea solution for calibration, we tested the change in the conductivity of the solution with conductivity meter within 5 min (the urease activity of the bacterial solution is the average change in conductivity multiplied by the dilution factor of the bacterial solution).The experimental results showed that when the pH value increases from 7 to 10, the conductivity change values ofBacillus sphaericus added with Bacillus mucilaginosus were 0.20 ms/cm, 0.21 ms/cm, 0.19 ms/cm, 0.17 ms/cm, and 0.17 ms/cm, respectively. In the comparison group without added Bacillus, the conductivity changes were 0.18 ms/cm, 0.25 ms/cm, 0.19 ms/cm, and 0.20 ms/cm, respectively. The above data confirmed that Bacillus sphaericus produced the highest enzyme activity when pH value equals 8 in both cases.


## 2.4. Mineralization under the Action ofBacillus mucilaginosus

In order to study the effect of mineralization on the introduction ofBacillus mucilaginosus, we first inoculated Bacillus sphaericus in six bottles of a liquid medium with 100 ml per bottle. At the same time, we inoculated Bacillus mucilaginosus in 100 ml of liquid medium for culture. After the inoculated medium was placed in a constant temperature shaking incubator at 31°C for 24 h, we took out the Bacillus mucilaginosus solution and added them into the previously prepared 5 bottles of Bacillus sphaericus with the percentage of 10 : 1, 8 : 1, 6 : 1, 4 : 1, and 2 : 1, respectively. After that, they were further incubated with the blank comparison group for 24 hours. Figure 5 illustrates the experimental process.Figure 5
Mineralization process withBacillus mucilaginosus added.
(a)(b)(c)(d)After 24 hours of mixed culture, we took out six bottles of bacteria and centrifuged them by a centrifuge. In the centrifugation process, both anhydrous ethanol and distilled water were added three times. After that, we took out the lower layer of the centrifuge tube and dried it in a glass Petri dish. The experimental results show that when the ratio ofBacillus mucilaginosus and Bacillus sphaericus is 1 : 6, the deposition of calcium carbonate is the highest, as shown in Figure 6. The amount of calcium carbonate formed when Bacillus mucilaginosus was added in a ratio of 1 : 6 was 0.852 g; in contrast, under the same conditions, the amount of calcium carbonate precipitated by Bacillus globosa was only 0.451 g. Experiments reveal that Bacillus mucilaginosus can coexist with Bacillus sphaericus and continuously secrete carbonic anhydrase in vitro. Carbonic anhydrase can accelerate the combination of carbonate ions and calcium ions to promote the formation of calcium carbonate and effectively increase the yield of Bacillus sphaericus mineralization products. In other words, Bacillus mucilaginosus can significantly improve the rate of crack repair together with Bacillus sphaericus.Figure 6
Comparison of the amount of calcium carbonate with (a) and without (b)Bacillus mucilaginosus.
(a)(b)


## 3. Experimental Results Analysis

We selected two samples for the analysis of the experimental results: the mineralization products formed by theBacillus mucilaginosus experimental group (sample 1) and that formed only by Bacillus sphaericus (sample 2).


### 3.1. XRD Analysis

Figure7 shows the XRD patterns of the two samples.Figure 7
XRD patterns of the two samples.It can be seen from Figure7 that the characteristic diffraction peaks of the two samples are approximately coincident, and all appear at 2θ values of 25°, 27°, 33°, 44°, and 50°. That is, both samples comply with the characteristics of the characteristic diffraction peaks of vaterite-type calcium carbonate. Besides, the two samples exhibited weak diffraction peak signals at 23°, 29°, 36°, 39°, 43°, 47.5°, and 48.5°; i.e., they both follow the characteristics of the characteristic diffraction peaks of calcite-type calcium carbonate. As a consequence, the main components of the two minerals are vaterite and contain a small amount of calcite as well.


### 3.2. SEM Analysis

The SEM analysis of the two samples is demonstrated in Figure8.Figure 8
SEM spectra of the two samples. (a) Mineralization materials of sample 1. (b) Mineralization materials of sample 2.
(a)(b)It can be seen from Figure8 that the crystals of the two samples are spherical calcium carbonate particles, and the calcium carbonate particle of sample 2 is slightly larger than that of sample 1. This is because in the double bacterial liquid mineralization, due to the action of carbonic anhydrase secreted by Bacillus mucilaginosus in vitro, the double bacteria liquid accelerates the formation of small-sized calcium carbonate particles, and the spherical calcium carbonate particles formed have a diameter of about one μm. In addition, the morphology of the two mineral crystals is not much different, and the surface has prominent ridges. This is because bacteria and enzymes are involved in the crystallization process, resulting in incomplete smoothness of the crystal surface.


### 3.3. FTIR Analysis

Figure9 shows the FTIR spectra of the two samples.Figure 9
FTIR spectra of the two samples.The peak values of sample 1 appeared at 745.71 cm−1, 876 cm−1, 1088.22 cm−1, and 1490.6 cm−1, respectively. Among them, 876 cm−1 corresponds to the CO32− out-of-plane deformation vibration of the calcite crystal form, 1088.22 cm−1 corresponds to the CO32− symmetric expansion of the calcite crystal form, and 1490.6 cm−1 corresponds to the C-O antisymmetric stretching vibration of the calcium carbonate. However, the absorption peak at 1490.6 cm−1 showed a redshift of 69.6 cm−1, indicating that Bacillus mucilaginosus, carbonic anhydrase, and organic matter were embedded in the crystal during mineralization in the process of mineralization, which affected the morphology of calcium carbonate crystals. This is consistent with the SEM analysis. The absorption peak at 745.71 cm−1 corresponds to the characteristic peak of in-plane bending of the gangue crystal form CO32−, revealing that the calcium carbonate formed during the biomineralization of Bacillus sphaericus is mainly composed of vaterite, and some calcite crystal is formed as well. The peaks of sample 2 appear at 745.67 cm−1, 876 cm−1, 1075.99 cm−1, and 1498.21 cm−1, respectively, corresponding to the CO32− in-plane deformation of the smectite crystal, the CO32− out-of-plane deformation vibration, the CO32− symmetric expansion, and the C-O antisymmetric stretching vibration of the calcite crystal. Infrared comparative analysis of the two groups of samples revealed that the addition of Bacillus mucilaginosus did not alter the crystal morphology of the Bacillus sphaericus mineralization product.


### 3.4. TG-DSC Analysis

Figures10 and 11 depict the TG-DSC spectra of the two samples, respectively.Figure 10
TG-DSC spectra of sample 1.Figure 11
TG-DSC spectra of sample 2.When Sample 1 and Sample 2 were decomposed by 5% (corresponding TG was 95%), the initial decomposition temperatures were 102.5°C and 95.5°C, respectively. This indicates that the thermal stability of sample 1 is slightly higher than that of sample 2 and the addition ofBacillus mucilaginosus does not affect the thermal stability of Bacillus sphaericus mineralization. At the same time, the peak temperature of the maximum decomposition rate of sample 1 appears at around 650°C; and the peak temperature of the maximum decomposition rate appears at around 300°C and around 680°C. In addition, Sample 1 processes three absorption peaks between 580°C and 720°C, representing three consecutive endothermic decomposition processes. That is, Sample 1 showed rapid decomposition at this stage. Sample 2 had two absorption peaks between 680°C and 720°C, indicating that Sample 2 showed rapid decomposition at this stage.


## 3.1. XRD Analysis

Figure7 shows the XRD patterns of the two samples.Figure 7
XRD patterns of the two samples.It can be seen from Figure7 that the characteristic diffraction peaks of the two samples are approximately coincident, and all appear at 2θ values of 25°, 27°, 33°, 44°, and 50°. That is, both samples comply with the characteristics of the characteristic diffraction peaks of vaterite-type calcium carbonate. Besides, the two samples exhibited weak diffraction peak signals at 23°, 29°, 36°, 39°, 43°, 47.5°, and 48.5°; i.e., they both follow the characteristics of the characteristic diffraction peaks of calcite-type calcium carbonate. As a consequence, the main components of the two minerals are vaterite and contain a small amount of calcite as well.


## 3.2. SEM Analysis

The SEM analysis of the two samples is demonstrated in Figure8.Figure 8
SEM spectra of the two samples. (a) Mineralization materials of sample 1. (b) Mineralization materials of sample 2.
(a)(b)It can be seen from Figure8 that the crystals of the two samples are spherical calcium carbonate particles, and the calcium carbonate particle of sample 2 is slightly larger than that of sample 1. This is because in the double bacterial liquid mineralization, due to the action of carbonic anhydrase secreted by Bacillus mucilaginosus in vitro, the double bacteria liquid accelerates the formation of small-sized calcium carbonate particles, and the spherical calcium carbonate particles formed have a diameter of about one μm. In addition, the morphology of the two mineral crystals is not much different, and the surface has prominent ridges. This is because bacteria and enzymes are involved in the crystallization process, resulting in incomplete smoothness of the crystal surface.


## 3.3. FTIR Analysis

Figure9 shows the FTIR spectra of the two samples.Figure 9
FTIR spectra of the two samples.The peak values of sample 1 appeared at 745.71 cm−1, 876 cm−1, 1088.22 cm−1, and 1490.6 cm−1, respectively. Among them, 876 cm−1 corresponds to the CO32− out-of-plane deformation vibration of the calcite crystal form, 1088.22 cm−1 corresponds to the CO32− symmetric expansion of the calcite crystal form, and 1490.6 cm−1 corresponds to the C-O antisymmetric stretching vibration of the calcium carbonate. However, the absorption peak at 1490.6 cm−1 showed a redshift of 69.6 cm−1, indicating that Bacillus mucilaginosus, carbonic anhydrase, and organic matter were embedded in the crystal during mineralization in the process of mineralization, which affected the morphology of calcium carbonate crystals. This is consistent with the SEM analysis. The absorption peak at 745.71 cm−1 corresponds to the characteristic peak of in-plane bending of the gangue crystal form CO32−, revealing that the calcium carbonate formed during the biomineralization of Bacillus sphaericus is mainly composed of vaterite, and some calcite crystal is formed as well. The peaks of sample 2 appear at 745.67 cm−1, 876 cm−1, 1075.99 cm−1, and 1498.21 cm−1, respectively, corresponding to the CO32− in-plane deformation of the smectite crystal, the CO32− out-of-plane deformation vibration, the CO32− symmetric expansion, and the C-O antisymmetric stretching vibration of the calcite crystal. Infrared comparative analysis of the two groups of samples revealed that the addition of Bacillus mucilaginosus did not alter the crystal morphology of the Bacillus sphaericus mineralization product.


## 3.4. TG-DSC Analysis

Figures10 and 11 depict the TG-DSC spectra of the two samples, respectively.Figure 10
TG-DSC spectra of sample 1.Figure 11
TG-DSC spectra of sample 2.When Sample 1 and Sample 2 were decomposed by 5% (corresponding TG was 95%), the initial decomposition temperatures were 102.5°C and 95.5°C, respectively. This indicates that the thermal stability of sample 1 is slightly higher than that of sample 2 and the addition ofBacillus mucilaginosus does not affect the thermal stability of Bacillus sphaericus mineralization. At the same time, the peak temperature of the maximum decomposition rate of sample 1 appears at around 650°C; and the peak temperature of the maximum decomposition rate appears at around 300°C and around 680°C. In addition, Sample 1 processes three absorption peaks between 580°C and 720°C, representing three consecutive endothermic decomposition processes. That is, Sample 1 showed rapid decomposition at this stage. Sample 2 had two absorption peaks between 680°C and 720°C, indicating that Sample 2 showed rapid decomposition at this stage.


## 4. Conclusions

This paper analyzed the influencing factors of growth ofBacillus sphaericus and the change trend of urease activity with pH value. On this basis, we discussed the crystal type and microstructure of mineralized products before and after introduction of Bacillus mucilaginosus and explored the effect of Bacillus mucilaginosus on the biomineralization ability of Bacillus sphaericus. The paper concludes the following:(1)
The optimum pH value for the growth of Bacillus sphaericus is 7, and the environment with a pH value of 8 can maintain the growth activity ofBacillus sphaericus as well. The optimal amount of urea concentration, Ca2+ concentration, and LB medium concentration for growth of Bacillus sphaericus are 0.5 mol/L, 0.6 mol/L, and 20 g/L, respectively.(2)
BothBacillus sphaericus and Bacillus oxysporum introduced the highest enzyme activity at a pH of 8.(3)
When the volume ratio ofBacillus mucilaginosus to Bacillus sphaericus was 1 : 6, the amount of calcium carbonate precipitated was the highest, which was 1.89 times of the amount of calcium carbonate precipitated by Bacillus sphaericus under the same conditions.(4)
The main component of both single and double bacterial mineral products is vaterite. They contain a small amount of calcite as well. The crystals of the two mineralized samples are spherical calcium carbonate particles, and the particle size of the single bacterial mineral products is slightly larger. The thermal stability of the double bacterial mineralized product is slightly higher than that of the single bacterial bacteria.In our future research, we plan to prepare biomineralization promoter out of carbonic anhydrase by extracting the supernatant ofBacillus mucilaginosus, and we will attempt to investigate the direct influence of carbonic anhydrase on biomineralization.



---

*Source: 6483803-2020-07-18.xml*