# Effect of Early Electroacupuncture Combined with Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) on Pain Perception and Dysfunction in Patients after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)

Authors: Tian Zhang; Hongju Liu; Hui Li; Sha He; Li Xiao; Ting Qin; Wei long Xu
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

Objective. A retrospective case-control study was performed to observe the effect and clinical significance of early electroacupuncture combined with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on pain perception and dysfunction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. About 100 patients who diagnosed with TKA from February 2019 to April 2021 were enrolled in our hospital. The patients were arbitrarily assigned into control group and study group. The former group was cured with electroacupuncture in the early stage, and the latter group was intervened on the basis of early electroacupuncture combined with the concept of ERAS. The curative effect, the time of getting out of bed for the first time after operation, the time of postoperative rehabilitation, postoperative rehabilitation cost, pain score and knee joint function score, range of motion (ROM) of knee joint, low shear of whole blood viscosity, plasma viscosity, fibrinogen level, and postoperative complications were compared. Results. There exhibited no statistical difference in clinical data. In terms of the treatment effects, there were 27 cases of markedly effective, 22 cases of effective, and 1 case of ineffective in the study group, and the total effective rate was 98.00%; in the control group, 15 cases were markedly effective, 28 cases were effective, and 13 cases were ineffective, and the total effective rate was 86.00%. Compared to the control group, the total effective rate of the study group was higher (P<0.05). And the first time to get out of bed and the postoperative rehabilitation time in the study group were lower. Compared to the control group (10113.42 ± 524.83) yuan, the postoperative rehabilitation cost in the study group (12401.71 ± 530.77) yuan was higher. In terms of the scores of VAS and HSS, there exhibited no remarkable difference before treatment (P>0.05). After treatment, the VAS score lessened and the HSS score augmented the study group VAS score (1.76 ± 0.28); the score in the control group was lower compared to the control group (3.45 ± 0.36), and HSS scoring (83.48 ± 11.23) points higher compared to the control group (65.82 ± 10.44) points (P<0.05). The ROM of knee joint augmented successively at the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 8th week after treatment comparison between groups, the ROM of the knee joint in the study group at the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 8th week was (49.47 ± 3.60)°, (64.38 ± 5.32)°, (86.93 ± 6.72)°, and (104.20 ± 9.11)°, is higher compared to the control group (46.53 ± 3.41)°, (61.52 ± 5.20)°, (78.42 ± 6.45)°, and (98.77 ± 8.67)° (P<0.05). One day after operation, there exhibited no remarkable difference in whole blood viscosity low shear, plasma viscosity, and fibrinogen level (P>0.05). However, there exhibited no remarkable difference in plasma viscosity and fibrinogen level at 1 day and 7 days after operation (P>0.05). Seven days after operation, the whole blood viscosity, plasma viscosity, and fibrinogen in the study group were lower (P<0.05). The probability of postoperative complications was compared. In the study group, there were 2 cases of limb swelling and pain, 1 case of joint stiffness, and no swelling and pain complicated with deep venous thrombosis, and the total incidence was 6.00%. In the control group, there were 5 cases of limb swelling and pain, 3 cases of joint stiffness, and 3 cases of swelling and pain complicated with deep venous thrombosis, with a total incidence of 22.00%. The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was lower (χ2 = 5.317 P<0.05). Conclusion. Early electroacupuncture combined with ERAS is of positive significance to the patients after TKA, which can reduce the pain, enhance the function of the knee joint, and promote the ROM of the knee joint, and can effectively shorten the first time out of bed and postoperative rehabilitation time and reduce whole blood viscosity low shear, plasma viscosity, and fibrinogen level, but the overall rehabilitation cost is high, and clinical application should be combined with the actual situation of patients.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has developed rapidly in recent years, and has become the most effective and ideal method for the treatment of end-stage knee disease. Postoperative symptoms are remarkably enhanced and joint function is close to normal, which is recognized all over the world [1–4]. On the one hand, the continuous improvement of surgical technology has greatly augmented the success rate of TKA, and its exact curative effect has been more recognized; on the other hand, the rehabilitation after TKA has developed relatively slowly, due to the occurrence of postoperative trauma pain and perioperative complications, affecting the enthusiasm of patients for early exercise after operation and delaying the recovery of joint function. As a result, the postoperative recovery of the patient did not meet the expected goal of treatment [5–8]. As an auxiliary means of analgesia, electroacupuncture has made great progress in recent years. For patients after TKA, electroacupuncture in the early stage of rehabilitation can, on the one hand, reduce the consumption of analgesics on the premise of stable vital signs of the patients [9]. Meanwhile, it can reduce the adverse reactions caused by analgesic drugs, so that patients can go to the ground as soon as possible, active exercise, and reduce hospitalization time. Moreover, other studies have indicated that effective acupuncture can dredge meridians, regulate the movement of qi and blood in the body, accelerate blood flow speed and lessen blood viscosity, and prevent the formation of deep venous thrombosis of lower extremities after TKA [10]. In the 1990s, HenikKehlet put forward the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), through the cooperation of many disciplines [11–13], a series of measures to intervene patients in the perioperative period, so that patients smoothly through the stage of postoperative rehabilitation, clinical application has achieved good results [14]. At present, it is the most successful in gastrointestinal surgery and cardiothoracic surgery, and a lot of experience has been obtained. In recent years, joint surgeons first introduced this method and achieved remarkable results in TKA. However, there are no specific measures for the concept of ERAS for TKA in China, or various measures are different, and even some measures are still to be discussed. Based on this, the aim of this study is to evaluate the application value of early electroacupuncture combined with ERAS in patients after TKA.


## 2. Patients and Methods

### 2.1. Clinical Information

About 100 patients who diagnosed with TKA from February 2019 to April 2021 were enrolled. The patients were arbitrarily assigned into control group and study group. In the former group, the age was 43-74 years old, with an average of 65.91 ± 3.63 years, containing 28 males and 22 females, while in the latter group, the age was 44-76 years old, with an average of 65.96 ± 3.58 years, containing 26 males and 24 females. There exhibited no statistical significance in the general data. This study was permitted by the Medical Ethics Association of our hospital, and informed consent was obtained by all patients.The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) the age was ≥18 years old; (2) the patients had good communication skills and no language barrier, and could actively cooperate with the relevant scores, examinations, and inquiries; (3) the preoperative routine laboratory indexes were normal; (4) and all patients underwent unilateral total TKA for the first time.Exclusion criteria: (1) patients with severe heart, liver, renal insufficiency, malignant tumor, and other diseases; (2) patients with long-term infection or short-term infection that were not cured after treatment, or those whose infection had been cured for less than one year; (3) knee joint flexion deformity, knee extension device has serious dysfunction or discontinuity and so on.


### 2.2. Treatment Methods

The control group received early electroacupuncture treatment; the method is as follows: acupoint selection: following the principle of selecting acupoints near and along meridians, and considering the bandaging range of bandages after operation, two groups of acupoints were enrolled. The first group: Fenglong, Guanguan, Sanyinjiao, Jimen; the second group: Liangqiu, Zusanli, Xuehai, ground machine. The first group of acupoints was punctured on the first and second day after operation, and the second group of acupoints was punctured from the third day. Test instrument: select Huacheng brand stainless steel Bo needle (Suzhou Dongbang Medical equipment Co., Ltd., No. 36, diameter 0.2 mm, length 40 mm). The electroacupuncture instrument is Huatai brand SDZ-II electronic acupuncture instrument (Suzhou Medical supplies Factory Co., Ltd.). Operation procedure: the patient was sent to the recovery room after operation, and electroacupuncture was performed by an acupuncturist to determine acupoints. The skin was routinely disinfected with iodophor cotton swabs and used filiform needle puncture, with a depth of about 1.5 inch. Then, constantly ask the patient whether the feeling of acid, numbness, and distension, after getting gas, carry out the dragon-tiger combat method for 3 times, and then connect the electroacupuncture output wire to the filiform needle. The intensity of electroacupuncture is based on the patient’s tolerance, and the frequency of electroacupuncture is the dense wave of 1/30 Hz, which lasts for 30 minutes. At the end of the treatment, each button is adjusted back to the starting position, the electrode is removed, and the filiform needle is pulled out. On this basis, the research group combined with the ERAS, the measures are as follows: (1) From the day of hospitalization, patients with no contraindications to drugs were given oral celecoxib capsule (200 mg QD). (2) They can eat 6 hours before operation and drink 5% glucose 250-400 ml 2 hours before operation. Patients with diabetes are given the same amount of 10% xylitol solution instead of 3.5% xylitol solution. (3) Then, 30 minutes before operation, 1 g of tranexamic acid and sodium chloride injection was injected intravenously, and 1 g of tranexamic acid and sodium chloride injection was immersed in the joint cavity for 10 minutes. (4) Before suturing the joint capsule, local analgesia was performed by injecting 0.5% ropivacaine 10 ml diluted twice as much around the knee joint (muscle, ligament, subcutaneous, etc.). (5) After suturing the articular cavity, 2 g tranexamic acid was injected into the articular cavity through the drainage tube, and the drainage tube was clamped for 4 hours, and 1 g tranexamic acid was added intravenously 3 hours after operation. From 4 hours after operation, the medial thigh skin was tested with cotton swabs every 1 hour. After feeling normal, the catheter was clamped and removed early when the patient had the desire to urinate. (6) In addition, press the affected leg with the healthy leg beside the bed every day, practice the flexion function 4-6 times, 5-10 minutes each time, and keep the knee joint straight 0°when in the straight position. Course of treatment: each patient needs to be treated continuously for 1 week, once a day, a total of 7 times.


### 2.3. Evaluation Index

#### 2.3.1. Curative Effect Evaluation

(1) Remarkable effect: there is no disorder of knee joint function after treatment, which is basically normal; effective: knee joint movement is limited; ineffective: knee joint function is seriously limited; total effective rate = markedly effective rate + effective rate; (2) the time of getting out of bed for the first time after operation, the time of postoperative rehabilitation, and the cost of postoperative rehabilitation were compared


#### 2.3.2. Pain Score and Knee Joint Function Score

The visual analog score (VAS) scale [15] was employed to score the pain before and after treatment: draw a straight line on the paper and divide it into 10 equal parts. 0-10 score 0 indicates normal feeling, 10 indicates severe pain and is unbearable, and the middle part demonstrates that with the increase of the value, the pain degree augments.Knee joint function is evaluated by specially trained doctors and nurses according to the curative effect evaluation system of TKA established by New York Special surgery Hospital [16]. There were 7 items, of which 6 items were scored items, containing pain (30 points), function (22 points), ROM (18 points), muscle strength (10 points), flexion deformity (10 points), and joint stability (10 points). The other item is a deduction item, which involves the need for walker, valgus deformity, incomplete extension, and so on. According to the score, they were assigned into four grades: > 85 as excellent, 70-84 as good, 60-69 as medium, and < 59 as poor.


#### 2.3.3. Evaluation Method of ROM of Knee Joint

At 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after treatment, the higher the ROM, ROM of the knee joint, the better the ROM of the two groups.


#### 2.3.4. Methods for Detection of Whole Blood Viscosity, Low Shear Rate, Plasma Viscosity, and Fibrinogen Level

Testing materials: 1000μL sampling gun, disposable plastic suction head, anticoagulant; testing instrument: automatic hemorheological detector. Operation procedure: first preheat the machine to 37°C, then wash it with lotion, and then add 850 μL~950 μL distilled water to check whether the machine is stable or not. After the machine is stable, add 850 μL°~950 μL anticoagulant or plasma preheated at 37°C, and click the corresponding option to test (not all, suction head should leave a little residual blood, so as not to produce bubbles to affect the test results).


#### 2.3.5. Probability of Postoperative Complications

The postoperative complications such as swelling and pain of the affected limb, stiffness of the joint, and swelling and pain complicated with deep venous thrombosis in the two groups were counted. Swelling and pain of the affected limb: the measurement of the soft ruler around the horizontal position of the strongest leg was greater than that determined by 2 cm before operation as swelling; joint stiffness: limited joint movement after operation, knee flexion <90 or lack of straightening 5% at discharge; lower limb swelling, pain, positive Homan sign, positive color Doppler ultrasound.


### 2.4. Statistical Analysis

SPSS21.0 statistical software was employed for statistical processing, and the measurement data were expressed as ±s. T-test was adopted to compare the two groups, andχ2 test was employed to compare the counting data between the two groups. P<0.05, the difference exhibited statistical significance.


## 2.1. Clinical Information

About 100 patients who diagnosed with TKA from February 2019 to April 2021 were enrolled. The patients were arbitrarily assigned into control group and study group. In the former group, the age was 43-74 years old, with an average of 65.91 ± 3.63 years, containing 28 males and 22 females, while in the latter group, the age was 44-76 years old, with an average of 65.96 ± 3.58 years, containing 26 males and 24 females. There exhibited no statistical significance in the general data. This study was permitted by the Medical Ethics Association of our hospital, and informed consent was obtained by all patients.The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) the age was ≥18 years old; (2) the patients had good communication skills and no language barrier, and could actively cooperate with the relevant scores, examinations, and inquiries; (3) the preoperative routine laboratory indexes were normal; (4) and all patients underwent unilateral total TKA for the first time.Exclusion criteria: (1) patients with severe heart, liver, renal insufficiency, malignant tumor, and other diseases; (2) patients with long-term infection or short-term infection that were not cured after treatment, or those whose infection had been cured for less than one year; (3) knee joint flexion deformity, knee extension device has serious dysfunction or discontinuity and so on.


## 2.2. Treatment Methods

The control group received early electroacupuncture treatment; the method is as follows: acupoint selection: following the principle of selecting acupoints near and along meridians, and considering the bandaging range of bandages after operation, two groups of acupoints were enrolled. The first group: Fenglong, Guanguan, Sanyinjiao, Jimen; the second group: Liangqiu, Zusanli, Xuehai, ground machine. The first group of acupoints was punctured on the first and second day after operation, and the second group of acupoints was punctured from the third day. Test instrument: select Huacheng brand stainless steel Bo needle (Suzhou Dongbang Medical equipment Co., Ltd., No. 36, diameter 0.2 mm, length 40 mm). The electroacupuncture instrument is Huatai brand SDZ-II electronic acupuncture instrument (Suzhou Medical supplies Factory Co., Ltd.). Operation procedure: the patient was sent to the recovery room after operation, and electroacupuncture was performed by an acupuncturist to determine acupoints. The skin was routinely disinfected with iodophor cotton swabs and used filiform needle puncture, with a depth of about 1.5 inch. Then, constantly ask the patient whether the feeling of acid, numbness, and distension, after getting gas, carry out the dragon-tiger combat method for 3 times, and then connect the electroacupuncture output wire to the filiform needle. The intensity of electroacupuncture is based on the patient’s tolerance, and the frequency of electroacupuncture is the dense wave of 1/30 Hz, which lasts for 30 minutes. At the end of the treatment, each button is adjusted back to the starting position, the electrode is removed, and the filiform needle is pulled out. On this basis, the research group combined with the ERAS, the measures are as follows: (1) From the day of hospitalization, patients with no contraindications to drugs were given oral celecoxib capsule (200 mg QD). (2) They can eat 6 hours before operation and drink 5% glucose 250-400 ml 2 hours before operation. Patients with diabetes are given the same amount of 10% xylitol solution instead of 3.5% xylitol solution. (3) Then, 30 minutes before operation, 1 g of tranexamic acid and sodium chloride injection was injected intravenously, and 1 g of tranexamic acid and sodium chloride injection was immersed in the joint cavity for 10 minutes. (4) Before suturing the joint capsule, local analgesia was performed by injecting 0.5% ropivacaine 10 ml diluted twice as much around the knee joint (muscle, ligament, subcutaneous, etc.). (5) After suturing the articular cavity, 2 g tranexamic acid was injected into the articular cavity through the drainage tube, and the drainage tube was clamped for 4 hours, and 1 g tranexamic acid was added intravenously 3 hours after operation. From 4 hours after operation, the medial thigh skin was tested with cotton swabs every 1 hour. After feeling normal, the catheter was clamped and removed early when the patient had the desire to urinate. (6) In addition, press the affected leg with the healthy leg beside the bed every day, practice the flexion function 4-6 times, 5-10 minutes each time, and keep the knee joint straight 0°when in the straight position. Course of treatment: each patient needs to be treated continuously for 1 week, once a day, a total of 7 times.


## 2.3. Evaluation Index

### 2.3.1. Curative Effect Evaluation

(1) Remarkable effect: there is no disorder of knee joint function after treatment, which is basically normal; effective: knee joint movement is limited; ineffective: knee joint function is seriously limited; total effective rate = markedly effective rate + effective rate; (2) the time of getting out of bed for the first time after operation, the time of postoperative rehabilitation, and the cost of postoperative rehabilitation were compared


### 2.3.2. Pain Score and Knee Joint Function Score

The visual analog score (VAS) scale [15] was employed to score the pain before and after treatment: draw a straight line on the paper and divide it into 10 equal parts. 0-10 score 0 indicates normal feeling, 10 indicates severe pain and is unbearable, and the middle part demonstrates that with the increase of the value, the pain degree augments.Knee joint function is evaluated by specially trained doctors and nurses according to the curative effect evaluation system of TKA established by New York Special surgery Hospital [16]. There were 7 items, of which 6 items were scored items, containing pain (30 points), function (22 points), ROM (18 points), muscle strength (10 points), flexion deformity (10 points), and joint stability (10 points). The other item is a deduction item, which involves the need for walker, valgus deformity, incomplete extension, and so on. According to the score, they were assigned into four grades: > 85 as excellent, 70-84 as good, 60-69 as medium, and < 59 as poor.


### 2.3.3. Evaluation Method of ROM of Knee Joint

At 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after treatment, the higher the ROM, ROM of the knee joint, the better the ROM of the two groups.


### 2.3.4. Methods for Detection of Whole Blood Viscosity, Low Shear Rate, Plasma Viscosity, and Fibrinogen Level

Testing materials: 1000μL sampling gun, disposable plastic suction head, anticoagulant; testing instrument: automatic hemorheological detector. Operation procedure: first preheat the machine to 37°C, then wash it with lotion, and then add 850 μL~950 μL distilled water to check whether the machine is stable or not. After the machine is stable, add 850 μL°~950 μL anticoagulant or plasma preheated at 37°C, and click the corresponding option to test (not all, suction head should leave a little residual blood, so as not to produce bubbles to affect the test results).


### 2.3.5. Probability of Postoperative Complications

The postoperative complications such as swelling and pain of the affected limb, stiffness of the joint, and swelling and pain complicated with deep venous thrombosis in the two groups were counted. Swelling and pain of the affected limb: the measurement of the soft ruler around the horizontal position of the strongest leg was greater than that determined by 2 cm before operation as swelling; joint stiffness: limited joint movement after operation, knee flexion <90 or lack of straightening 5% at discharge; lower limb swelling, pain, positive Homan sign, positive color Doppler ultrasound.


## 2.3.1. Curative Effect Evaluation

(1) Remarkable effect: there is no disorder of knee joint function after treatment, which is basically normal; effective: knee joint movement is limited; ineffective: knee joint function is seriously limited; total effective rate = markedly effective rate + effective rate; (2) the time of getting out of bed for the first time after operation, the time of postoperative rehabilitation, and the cost of postoperative rehabilitation were compared


## 2.3.2. Pain Score and Knee Joint Function Score

The visual analog score (VAS) scale [15] was employed to score the pain before and after treatment: draw a straight line on the paper and divide it into 10 equal parts. 0-10 score 0 indicates normal feeling, 10 indicates severe pain and is unbearable, and the middle part demonstrates that with the increase of the value, the pain degree augments.Knee joint function is evaluated by specially trained doctors and nurses according to the curative effect evaluation system of TKA established by New York Special surgery Hospital [16]. There were 7 items, of which 6 items were scored items, containing pain (30 points), function (22 points), ROM (18 points), muscle strength (10 points), flexion deformity (10 points), and joint stability (10 points). The other item is a deduction item, which involves the need for walker, valgus deformity, incomplete extension, and so on. According to the score, they were assigned into four grades: > 85 as excellent, 70-84 as good, 60-69 as medium, and < 59 as poor.


## 2.3.3. Evaluation Method of ROM of Knee Joint

At 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after treatment, the higher the ROM, ROM of the knee joint, the better the ROM of the two groups.


## 2.3.4. Methods for Detection of Whole Blood Viscosity, Low Shear Rate, Plasma Viscosity, and Fibrinogen Level

Testing materials: 1000μL sampling gun, disposable plastic suction head, anticoagulant; testing instrument: automatic hemorheological detector. Operation procedure: first preheat the machine to 37°C, then wash it with lotion, and then add 850 μL~950 μL distilled water to check whether the machine is stable or not. After the machine is stable, add 850 μL°~950 μL anticoagulant or plasma preheated at 37°C, and click the corresponding option to test (not all, suction head should leave a little residual blood, so as not to produce bubbles to affect the test results).


## 2.3.5. Probability of Postoperative Complications

The postoperative complications such as swelling and pain of the affected limb, stiffness of the joint, and swelling and pain complicated with deep venous thrombosis in the two groups were counted. Swelling and pain of the affected limb: the measurement of the soft ruler around the horizontal position of the strongest leg was greater than that determined by 2 cm before operation as swelling; joint stiffness: limited joint movement after operation, knee flexion <90 or lack of straightening 5% at discharge; lower limb swelling, pain, positive Homan sign, positive color Doppler ultrasound.


## 2.4. Statistical Analysis

SPSS21.0 statistical software was employed for statistical processing, and the measurement data were expressed as ±s. T-test was adopted to compare the two groups, andχ2 test was employed to compare the counting data between the two groups. P<0.05, the difference exhibited statistical significance.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Comparison of Baseline Data of Patients

In the evaluation of baseline clinical indicators, there exhibited no remarkable difference in baseline data (P>0.05). All the results are indicated in Table 1.Table 1
Comparison of baseline data of patients.
GroupMale (example)Female (example)Age (years)Time of illness (year)Complicated with hypertension (example)Complicated with diabetes mellitus (example)C group282265.96 ± 3.584.23 ± 1.02118R group26∗24∗65.91 ± 3.63∗4.30 ± 1.11∗10∗7∗∗Compared with the control group, P>0.05.


### 3.2. Comparison of Therapeutic Effects

First of all, we compared the treatment effects. In the study group, 27 cases were markedly effective, 22 cases were effective, and 1 case was ineffective, and the total effective rate was 98.00%. In the control group, 15 cases were markedly effective, 28 cases were effective, and 13 cases were ineffective, and the total effective rate was 86.00%. The total effective rate of the study group was higher (P<0.05). All the results are indicated in Table 2.Table 2
Comparison of therapeutic effects [n/%].
GroupNRemarkable effectEffectiveInvalidTotal efficiencyC group5015 (30.00)28 (56.00)7 (14.00)43 (86.00)R group5027 (54.00)22 (44.00)1 (2.00)49 (98.00)χ24.891P0.026


### 3.3. Comparison of the Time of Getting Out of Bed for the First Time, the Time of Postoperative Rehabilitation, and the Cost of Postoperative Rehabilitation

Compared to the control group, the first time out of bed, the postoperative rehabilitation time, and the postoperative rehabilitation cost in the study group were lower, and the postoperative rehabilitation cost in the study group was higher (P<0.05). All the data results are indicated in Table 3.Table 3
Comparison of the time of getting out of bed for the first time, the time of postoperative rehabilitation, and the cost of postoperative rehabilitation [x¯±s].
GroupNThe first time to get out of bed after operation (d)Postoperative recovery time (d)Postoperative rehabilitation expenses (yuan)C group503.26 ± 0.9117.42 ± 3.5510113.42 ± 524.83R group502.71 ± 0.8612.53 ± 3.1012401.71 ± 530.77t3.1067.33721.677P0.0030.00010.0001


### 3.4. VAS, HSS Score Comparison

We compared the scores of VAS and HSS; there exhibited no remarkable difference before treatment, but after treatment, the VAS scores lessened and the HSS scores augmented, and compared to the control group, the VAS score of the study group was lower, while the HSS score of the study group was higher. All the data are indicated in Table4.Table 4
Comparison of VAS and HSS scores before and after treatment [x¯±s, Points].
GroupNVASHSSBefore treatmentAfter treatmentBefore treatmentAfter treatmentC group505.63 ± 1.123.45 ± 0.36a43.56 ± 7.7465.82 ± 10.44aR group505.46 ± 1.141.76 ± 0.28b43.17 ± 7.5683.48 ± 11.23bt0.75216.7120.2558.144P0.4540.00010.7990.0001Note: the control group before and after treatment, aP<0.05; the study group before and after treatment, bP<0.05.


### 3.5. Comparison of ROM of Knee Joint ROM in Different Periods after Treatment

We compared the ROM of knee joint in different periods after treatment. At the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 8th week after treatment, the ROM of knee joint in the study group was higher (P<0.05). The results of all the data are indicated in Table 5.Table 5
Comparison of knee joint ROM between the two groups after treatment [x¯±s, °].
GroupNWeek 1Week 2Week 4Week 8C group5046.53 ± 3.4161.52 ± 5.20a78.42 ± 6.45b98.77 ± 8.67cR group5049.47 ± 3.6064.38 ± 5.32a86.93 ± 6.72b104.20 ± 9.11ct4.1922.7186.4603.053P0.00010.0080.00010.003Note: compared with the first week, aP<0.05; compared with the second week, bP<0.05; compared with the 4th week, cP<0.05.


### 3.6. Comparison of Whole Blood Viscosity, Low Shear Rate, Plasma Viscosity, and Fibrinogen Level

We compared the low shear rate of whole blood viscosity, plasma viscosity, and fibrinogen level between 1 day and 7 days after operation. On the 1st day after operation, there exhibited no remarkable difference (P>0.05). At 7 days after operation, the whole blood viscosity low shear, plasma viscosity, and fibrinogen in the two groups lessened averagely, but there exhibited no remarkable difference in plasma viscosity and fibrinogen level at 1 day and 7 days after operation (P>0.05). Seven days after operation, the whole blood viscosity, plasma viscosity, and fibrinogen in the study group were lower (P<0.05). All the data are indicated in Table 6.Table 6
Comparison of whole blood viscosity low shear, plasma viscosity, and fibrinogen level between 1 day and 7 days after operation [x¯±s, %].
GroupNWhole blood viscosity low shearPlasma viscosityFibrinogen1 day after operation7 days after operation1 day after operation7 days after operation1 day after operation7 days after operationC group509.44 ± 2.517.83 ± 1.45a1.18 ± 0.531.02 ± 0.203.15 ± 0.343.01 ± 0.51R group509.40 ± 2.486.30 ± 1.22b1.15 ± 0.480.98 ± 0.15b3.18 ± 0.372.12 ± 0.45bt0.0805.7090.2971.1310.4229.253P0.9360.00010.7670.2610.6740.0001Note: in the control group, 1 day after operation and 7 days after operation, aP<0.05, while in the study group, 1 day after operation and 7 days after operation, bP<0.05.


### 3.7. Comparison of the Probability of Postoperative Complications

The probability of postoperative complications was compared. In the study group, there were 2 cases of limb swelling and pain, 1 case of joint stiffness, and no swelling and pain complicated with deep venous thrombosis, and the total incidence was 6.00%. In the control group, there were 5 cases of limb swelling and pain, 3 cases of joint stiffness, and 3 cases of swelling and pain complicated with deep venous thrombosis, with a total incidence of 22.00%. The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was lower (χ2 = 5.317 P<0.05).


## 3.1. Comparison of Baseline Data of Patients

In the evaluation of baseline clinical indicators, there exhibited no remarkable difference in baseline data (P>0.05). All the results are indicated in Table 1.Table 1
Comparison of baseline data of patients.
GroupMale (example)Female (example)Age (years)Time of illness (year)Complicated with hypertension (example)Complicated with diabetes mellitus (example)C group282265.96 ± 3.584.23 ± 1.02118R group26∗24∗65.91 ± 3.63∗4.30 ± 1.11∗10∗7∗∗Compared with the control group, P>0.05.


## 3.2. Comparison of Therapeutic Effects

First of all, we compared the treatment effects. In the study group, 27 cases were markedly effective, 22 cases were effective, and 1 case was ineffective, and the total effective rate was 98.00%. In the control group, 15 cases were markedly effective, 28 cases were effective, and 13 cases were ineffective, and the total effective rate was 86.00%. The total effective rate of the study group was higher (P<0.05). All the results are indicated in Table 2.Table 2
Comparison of therapeutic effects [n/%].
GroupNRemarkable effectEffectiveInvalidTotal efficiencyC group5015 (30.00)28 (56.00)7 (14.00)43 (86.00)R group5027 (54.00)22 (44.00)1 (2.00)49 (98.00)χ24.891P0.026


## 3.3. Comparison of the Time of Getting Out of Bed for the First Time, the Time of Postoperative Rehabilitation, and the Cost of Postoperative Rehabilitation

Compared to the control group, the first time out of bed, the postoperative rehabilitation time, and the postoperative rehabilitation cost in the study group were lower, and the postoperative rehabilitation cost in the study group was higher (P<0.05). All the data results are indicated in Table 3.Table 3
Comparison of the time of getting out of bed for the first time, the time of postoperative rehabilitation, and the cost of postoperative rehabilitation [x¯±s].
GroupNThe first time to get out of bed after operation (d)Postoperative recovery time (d)Postoperative rehabilitation expenses (yuan)C group503.26 ± 0.9117.42 ± 3.5510113.42 ± 524.83R group502.71 ± 0.8612.53 ± 3.1012401.71 ± 530.77t3.1067.33721.677P0.0030.00010.0001


## 3.4. VAS, HSS Score Comparison

We compared the scores of VAS and HSS; there exhibited no remarkable difference before treatment, but after treatment, the VAS scores lessened and the HSS scores augmented, and compared to the control group, the VAS score of the study group was lower, while the HSS score of the study group was higher. All the data are indicated in Table4.Table 4
Comparison of VAS and HSS scores before and after treatment [x¯±s, Points].
GroupNVASHSSBefore treatmentAfter treatmentBefore treatmentAfter treatmentC group505.63 ± 1.123.45 ± 0.36a43.56 ± 7.7465.82 ± 10.44aR group505.46 ± 1.141.76 ± 0.28b43.17 ± 7.5683.48 ± 11.23bt0.75216.7120.2558.144P0.4540.00010.7990.0001Note: the control group before and after treatment, aP<0.05; the study group before and after treatment, bP<0.05.


## 3.5. Comparison of ROM of Knee Joint ROM in Different Periods after Treatment

We compared the ROM of knee joint in different periods after treatment. At the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 8th week after treatment, the ROM of knee joint in the study group was higher (P<0.05). The results of all the data are indicated in Table 5.Table 5
Comparison of knee joint ROM between the two groups after treatment [x¯±s, °].
GroupNWeek 1Week 2Week 4Week 8C group5046.53 ± 3.4161.52 ± 5.20a78.42 ± 6.45b98.77 ± 8.67cR group5049.47 ± 3.6064.38 ± 5.32a86.93 ± 6.72b104.20 ± 9.11ct4.1922.7186.4603.053P0.00010.0080.00010.003Note: compared with the first week, aP<0.05; compared with the second week, bP<0.05; compared with the 4th week, cP<0.05.


## 3.6. Comparison of Whole Blood Viscosity, Low Shear Rate, Plasma Viscosity, and Fibrinogen Level

We compared the low shear rate of whole blood viscosity, plasma viscosity, and fibrinogen level between 1 day and 7 days after operation. On the 1st day after operation, there exhibited no remarkable difference (P>0.05). At 7 days after operation, the whole blood viscosity low shear, plasma viscosity, and fibrinogen in the two groups lessened averagely, but there exhibited no remarkable difference in plasma viscosity and fibrinogen level at 1 day and 7 days after operation (P>0.05). Seven days after operation, the whole blood viscosity, plasma viscosity, and fibrinogen in the study group were lower (P<0.05). All the data are indicated in Table 6.Table 6
Comparison of whole blood viscosity low shear, plasma viscosity, and fibrinogen level between 1 day and 7 days after operation [x¯±s, %].
GroupNWhole blood viscosity low shearPlasma viscosityFibrinogen1 day after operation7 days after operation1 day after operation7 days after operation1 day after operation7 days after operationC group509.44 ± 2.517.83 ± 1.45a1.18 ± 0.531.02 ± 0.203.15 ± 0.343.01 ± 0.51R group509.40 ± 2.486.30 ± 1.22b1.15 ± 0.480.98 ± 0.15b3.18 ± 0.372.12 ± 0.45bt0.0805.7090.2971.1310.4229.253P0.9360.00010.7670.2610.6740.0001Note: in the control group, 1 day after operation and 7 days after operation, aP<0.05, while in the study group, 1 day after operation and 7 days after operation, bP<0.05.


## 3.7. Comparison of the Probability of Postoperative Complications

The probability of postoperative complications was compared. In the study group, there were 2 cases of limb swelling and pain, 1 case of joint stiffness, and no swelling and pain complicated with deep venous thrombosis, and the total incidence was 6.00%. In the control group, there were 5 cases of limb swelling and pain, 3 cases of joint stiffness, and 3 cases of swelling and pain complicated with deep venous thrombosis, with a total incidence of 22.00%. The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was lower (χ2 = 5.317 P<0.05).


## 4. Discussion

TKA is currently an effective method for the treatment of severe knee joint diseases, and it is one of the most effective joint reconstruction operations in recent decades [17]. It is a common technique for the treatment of TKA, and it is also a fundamental method to solve the problem of knee joint degeneration [18]. This operation is recognized as an ideal treatment for correcting knee joint deformities and improving joint function. According to reports, its success rate has reached 90% in the past 15 years. With the development of living standards, there are more patients with severe knee disease undergoing total TKA. Nowadays, there are more than 1 million patients undergoing artificial joint replacement in our country. The factors that affect the therapeutic effect mainly include the patient’s own physical condition, the type of joint prosthesis, the technical level of doctors, and perioperative nursing. Among them, perioperative nursing of TKA has become one of the crucial factors affecting the effect of TKA [19]. With the development of technology, TKA has become one of the final clinical solutions. However, the injury induced by operation is also a problem that cannot be ignored, such as postoperative occult blood loss, joint pain, and even infection will affect the recovery of postoperative knee joint function, resulting in the effect of operation is not obvious. Studies have indicated that perioperative nutritional status and the incidence of postoperative complications, medical expenses, and length of stay are statistically remarkable [20]. At present, many studies have confirmed that, as a form of acupuncture, electroacupuncture acts on various meridian acupoints of the human body and stimulates acupoints with different frequencies of dense waves, so as to achieve the effect of dredging meridians and analgesia [20]. The core of the concept of ERAS is to improve a series of perioperative measures to enhance the tolerance of patients to surgery, speed up the recovery of various functions of the body after operation, and avoid the occurrence of related complications as much as possible [20, 21].At present, the rehabilitation nursing after TKA in China is mainly carried out by routine means, such as pain management and rehabilitation training. Some studies believe that TKA combined with electroacupuncture can enhance the therapeutic effect and reduce the pain of patients [21]. One month after TKA, the incidence of knee joint infection has been low, and it is in the safe period of rehabilitation treatment. Meanwhile, studies show that patients after TKA need about 8 weeks of rehabilitation treatment to enhance the functional activities of the body to achieve the level of daily life; there is no rehabilitation treatment that takes 16-32 weeks to basically meet the needs of daily life. Even in patients without obvious symptoms of discomfort, it is difficult to achieve the expected recovery of knee joint function, and the functional score is generally low. In the current study, the control group was cured with electroacupuncture in the early stage, and the study group was cured with the concept of ERAS on the basis of early electroacupuncture. Of note, 27 cases were markedly effective, 22 cases were effective, and 1 case was ineffective in the study group, and the total effective rate was 98.00%. In the control group, 15 cases were markedly effective, 28 cases were effective, and 13 cases were ineffective, and the total effective rate was 86.00%. The total effective rate of the study group was higher. The first time out of bed and the postoperative recovery time in the study group (2.71 ± 0.86) d and (12.53 ± 3.10) d were remarkably lower compared to the control group (6.04 ± 1.22) d and (34.85 ± 3.91) d. The probability of postoperative complications was compared. In the study group, there were 2 cases of limb swelling and pain, 1 case of joint stiffness, and no swelling and pain complicated with deep venous thrombosis, and the total incidence was 6.00%. In the control group, there were 5 cases of limb swelling and pain, 3 cases of joint stiffness, and 3 cases of swelling and pain complicated with deep venous thrombosis, with a total incidence of 22.00%. The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was lower compared to the control group. The analysis that is assigned into the occurrence of joint stiffness in patients is a gradual process, and medical staff should pay attention to supervised patients for functional exercise every day, test the degree of flexion of knee joints, and find out the problems existing in patients during exercise in time to avoid joint stiffness. In addition, early electroacupuncture combined with the concept of ERAS intervention plays a meaningful role in preventing knee joint stiffness and improving knee joint ROM in early and reasonable functional exercise after TKA.Related results indicate that pain is a symptom that has not been given enough attention for a long time. In any case, doctors must strive to alleviate the pain of patients through appropriate methods. According to clinical observation, the pain symptoms after TKA are improved obviously, but the knee joint function of some patients is not ideal after operation, which is related to the functional exercise due to pain after operation [22]. Pain not only makes patients feel pain physically, but also produces anxiety and other emotions psychologically, which seriously affects the normal functional metabolism of the body, and may cause related complications [23]. Meanwhile, severe pain will delay the first time of going to the ground, shorten the time of daily functional exercise, prolong the relative hospital stay, and virtually augment the economic burden of the society and the family [23]. According to the results of this study, there exhibited no remarkable difference in VAS and HSS scores before treatment. After treatment, the VAS score lessened and the HSS score augmented. Compared with the control group, the VAS score of the study group was lower, and the HSS score of the study group was higher (65.82 ± 10.44). The ROM of the knee joint augmented successively at the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 8th week after treatment, and the comparison was made; the ROM of the knee joint in the study group at the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 8th week was (49.47 ± 3.60)°, (64.38 ± 5.32)°, (86.93 ± 6.72)°, and (104.20 ± 9.11)°, is higher compared to the control group (46.53 ± 3.41)°, (61.52 ± 5.20)°, (78.42 ± 6.45)°, and (98.77 ± 8.67)°(P<0.05). The results show that electroacupuncture at acupoints can accelerate blood circulation, reduce blood stasis, and reduce the low shear of whole blood viscosity, erythrocyte aggregation index, fibrinogen, plasma viscosity, and other indexes. It makes it difficult for blood components to gather to form thrombus. In the early stage, electroacupuncture was used to stimulate acupoints after fracture in rabbits. It was also confirmed that electroacupuncture at acupoints could accelerate blood flow and relieve local swelling symptoms. With regard to the results of this study, there exhibited no remarkable difference in whole blood viscosity low shear rate, plasma viscosity, and fibrinogen level at 1 day after operation, but there exhibited no remarkable difference in whole blood viscosity low shear rate, plasma viscosity, and fibrinogen level at 7 days after operation. On the 7th day after operation, the whole blood viscosity, plasma viscosity, and fibrinogen in the study group were lower. The results indicated that compared with the first day after operation, on the 7th day after operation, the whole blood viscosity was low and the plasma viscosity and fibrinogen were remarkably lessened in the study group, which may be related to the regulation of electroacupuncture on the imbalance of autonomic neurovascular motor function. Meanwhile, it regulates the dynamic balance of coagulation system and antifibrinogen degradation system, cell aggregation and blood flow shear force, and finally enhances the blood hypercoagulable state.Although our study has drawn some conclusions, there are still some shortcomings. Firstly, this study is a retrospective case study, which may have some selection bias; in addition, the sample size is limited and the follow-up time is short. Therefore, our conclusions need to be confirmed in future randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes.Collectively, early electroacupuncture combined with ERAS is of positive significance to patients after TKA, which can reduce pain, improve knee joint function, and augment knee joint movement, and can effectively shorten the first time out of bed and postoperative rehabilitation time and reduce whole blood viscosity low shear, plasma viscosity, and fibrinogen level, but the overall rehabilitation cost is higher. Therefore, clinical application should be combined with the actual situation of patients after TKA.



---

*Source: 6560816-2022-05-09.xml*