# Research on Tax Collection and Administration Application and Legal Issues Based on Big Data Analysis

Authors: Chen Liuhong
Journal: Journal of Sensors
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

In the twenty-first century, in the era of rapid development of big data, people can make some basic problem analysis of the application of tax collection and administration and legal problems through big data. Between taxpayers and the tax collection and management system, the law is used to protect the legitimate rights and interests of taxpayers. Through the improvement and management of the supervision system, it can ensure that taxpayers can clearly know how much tax they should pay when paying taxes. At present, the urgent problem is to adjust the concept of tax, reconstruct the scope of tax, scientifically design the tax rate, and simplify the tax collection and administration procedures. This paper puts forward a more efficient tax process by comparing the tax data, the econometric study of tax, and the secret tax avoidance while the burden of the more poor rural tax class. Through the experiment proved, this paper studies the best tax collection and management mode, so that taxpayers can pay taxes more convenient and fast. The tax collection and administration system have been improved to make taxpayers’ information more comprehensive, which is very important for us to improve the efficiency in the twenty-first century, which is also a great breakthrough in the application of tax collection and administration. Due to the limitations of incomplete information, or that the information cannot keep up with the times, the tax collection and management system cannot completely correspond to the complete information of the correct taxpayers. Therefore, for the study of the taxation supervision system, it is necessary to use more algorithms in a more comprehensive way, so as to reduce the number of tax evaders and the number of active taxpayers.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

With the emergence of emerging services such as cloud computing, the Internet of Things, and social networks, the types and quantities of human social data have grown at an alarming rate, and the era of big data has arrived. Data has gone from being a simple transactional object to a fundamental resource. How people better manage and use big data has received a lot of attention [1]. The evolution or revolution of big data database research is a problem. Big data brings new opportunities to modern society and challenges for data scientists. The massive sample size and high dimensionality of big data pose unique computational and statistical challenges, including scalability and storage bottlenecks, noise accumulation, spurious correlations, chance endogeneity, and measurement error. These challenges are prominent and require new computational and statistical paradigms [2]. In this paper, I use a dynamic general equilibrium framework to assess the quantitative impact of incomplete tax enforcement on aggregate output and productivity. Then, I investigated the effects of improved enforcement. I found that with perfect enforcement, labor productivity and output are 19% higher under perfect competition and 34% higher under monopolistic competition. The source of this benefit is the elimination of distortions caused by incomplete tax enforcement [3]. This article draws inferences about a range of factors that may lead to stubborn taxation by comparing tax data and conducting an extensive econometric study of the main determinants of taxation. We found that the gap between potential and actual targets can be as high as 6% of GDP [4]. In any economic system, the collection of taxes obviously requires the use of resources. How to use reasonable resources is very important. This paper optimizes the method of resource allocation and proposes a new resource allocation scheme [5]. In this paper, we examine the impact of improving tax administration efficiency on the welfare of the taxpaying public and make plans to optimize the central and even local tax policies [6]. Using any other standard collection scheme used by the government, we identify an optimal tax collection policy that outperforms the taxes paid by calibrated agents. I have found that the design of an optimal audit program depends on three components: income distribution, identification of behavioral patterns, and the number of times an individual is audited [7]. This paper puts forward corresponding countermeasures on the basis of systematically analyzing the current situation and existing problems of tax collection and management in the field of e-commerce in my country. We found that there are problems in my country’s e-commerce tax collection and management, such as imperfect legal system, difficulty in tax base measurement, and uncertainty of tax objects [8]. The impact of increased income pressure is derived by a comparative approach. As income pressures increase, the “political value” of jobs granted decreases, and thus the efficiency of paying taxes [9]. Strengthen the training of tax personnel, strengthen the review of taxpayer transactions of affiliated enterprises, strictly monitor the taxpayer’s property loss declaration, improve tax reporting, and improve the quality and ability of tax auditing [10]. By comparing the “information flow” and “capital flow” of the two taxation and management models, this paper concludes that my country should transform the taxation model into an e-commerce taxation and management model under the control of “information flow.” Capital flow has its rationality and security technology guarantee [11]. An e-tax system is a computerized tax administration system designed to handle general tax administration from registration, assessment, filing, and processing of claims and tax refunds. Therefore, this paper aims to investigate the impact of the electronic tax system on the efficiency of tax collection by the Internal Revenue Service of the Tax Bureau [12]. Regulating the tax collection and management of developing industries is of great significance for improving the tax collection and management system and promoting the establishment of a fair and orderly market competition pattern [13]. In the context of urban-rural integration, reforming the concept of tax collection; reorganizing tax collection areas; designing scientific tax rates; and simplifying tax collection and management procedures are of great significance and have a regulating effect on the unified market of urban and rural construction land in my country [14]. This paper studies the optimization of the tax payment process in terms of taxation, aiming to minimize the taxpayer’s tax payment cumbersome process [15].


## 2. Analysis of Tax Collection and Management and Legal Issues

### 2.1. Basic Information of Tax Collection and Administration

Under the impact of the interaction and change of modern information technology, big data has entered more and more into the field of tax collection and administration, and digital tax management and data management have gradually become the development trend of tax collection and administration. Big data and information technology are indispensable forces to improve the ability of tax collection and administration. With the development of big data, there have been many virtual electronic payment and tax forms on the network, and the process is shown in Figures1 and 2.Figure 1
Tax payment process.Figure 2
Registration process of tax collection and administration.The implementation of a fair tax system may lead to the imbalance of different tax burden levels. In the era of big data, when the tax system is more traditional, there will be some tax evasion or even tax avoidance by individual enterprises and individuals. At this time, the protection of the law is needed to carry out normal taxation.


### 2.2. The Existing Legal Issues in Tax Collection and Administration

There are many legal problems in China’s tax revenue. In recent years, many stars have reported their tax problems, which also reflect the poor supervision of taxpayers in China, the difficulties in the identification of taxable objects under the background of digital economy, and the prominent tax jurisdiction problems and other problems. In the tax law, the meaning and scope of taxpayers are different, which should be made clear in the relevant laws and regulations, and will help to determine the scope of taxation. All citizens in our country must pay taxes according to law. This is the relevant provisions of the Constitution and can be regarded as a constitutional basis, but such provisions are very general and have no more detailed content. The digital economy era has brought more development opportunities, but it also highlights the shortcomings and defects of the current tax law system. Relevant legal systems, whether tax registration or tax management, need to be revised and improved to adapt to the growing market transaction pattern. In fact, under the influence of the rapid development of Internet technology, improving the legal system has become a very urgent and important task.


### 2.3. Tax Collection and Management System in the Era of Big Data

The “big data + tax” model has become the main theme of tax research in the Internet era. A relatively perfect set of tax collection and administration and tax service system can better realize the modernization of tax management, improve the efficiency of tax management, and quickly adapt to the development trend of informatics. In the era of big data, we can establish a unified taxpayer identification number and input it into the tax collection and management system according to a special taxpayer identification number, so as to facilitate the subsequent query when needed. As far as possible, the tax supervision system allows all taxpayers’ personal information to be input into the system, so that the system becomes more flexible and can timely tell taxpayers, the amount of tax to be paid, and tax time. In the interface of the tax collection and management system, the tax payment information is introduced in detail to analyze and process the information involved in the tax payment, which will more easily facilitate the operation of the subsequent taxpayers. In the era of big data, the relevant information of tax needles is abstracted as a traditional transmission and use process to ensure that their information can be conveyed normally and the efficiency of tax collection and management is improved. The tax loss can be reduced through the optimal revenue tax model. The optimal revenue tax model is shown in:(1)maxδx⟶0E∫0∞uσ1h,y1h−s1y1h−k1h,gtudt.With some basic information of tax collection and administration and the basic operation methods applicable to taxpayers, the legitimate rights and interests of taxpayers can be protected through law later, and the correct implementation of tax collection and administration can also be guaranteed through law. Under the condition of market equilibrium, the impact of tax policy on economic growth, two main conclusions are drawn: First, when the government implements a stable tax policy, there is a unique optimal capital stock path for consumers, along which the economy can sustained steady and optimal growth; when the tax path given by the government is unstable but can converge to a constant tax rate, there is also a capital stock path that can make the entire economy grow asymptotically and steadily, and eventually converge to the optimal state. Second, the optimal taxation path has the nature of a great road; that is, all optimal taxation paths will converge to the golden rule tax rate (the tax rate that keeps the economy in a stable and optimal growth state), and the government can adjust appropriately according to the golden rule tax rate tax policy, when the value of the tax plan formulated by the government in a certain period is much lower (or much higher) than the tax rate of the golden rule; an appropriate increase (or decrease) of tax at this time is beneficial to economic growth. This article identifies the income tax model most suitable for tax administration for contemporary problems.


### 2.4. Efficiency of the Tax Collection and Administration System

With the development of information technology, the tax collection and management mode can improve the mode of tax service. However, this cannot fully meet the new needs of new business under the background of big data, especially the deepening of e-commerce market, and the current tax collection and management mode cannot fully meet the needs in management. The advantages and disadvantages will accelerate the speed of tax collection and administration in China, but taxpayers will also show various tax avoidance behaviors through technical means, which makes the work of the tax administration department more difficult. At this stage, information technology can not achieve complex statistical and query operations; taxpayers can not pay taxes directly through the network; tax authorities need to go to the bank to audit data, pay taxes, and deduct taxes; taxpayers can apply for tax payment; and tax authorities themselves do not automatically exchange, which increases the tax process of taxpayers and the workload of tax officials. Tax efficiency can be studied by the variable model. Variable model is shown in(2)DDTBDijt=∂0+∂1TGTPit+∑control+∑company+∑Year+εijt.In China, it aims to obtain the maximum tax revenue at the lowest cost, maximize the economic growth, or apply tax rules to reduce the tax barriers to economic growth. It includes two aspects: tax administrative efficiency and tax economic efficiency. By utilizing the following formula:(3)BTDit=β0+β1TACCit+θi+εit.The possibility of subjective tax avoidance can be calculated by using the difference between pre-tax accounting profit and taxable profit to control tax revenue to the maximum extent. The market economy should be made to work efficiently in the most convenient and simple way possible. All the processes have become more streamlined, and some additional costs have been reduced. This is more conducive to the tax between the user and the country, more convenient and easier to operate.


### 2.5. Legal Principles of Tax Collection and Administration and Network Security Management

As an important part of national e-government, tax informatics has had a profound impact on the reform and renewal of tax management mode, and plays an important role in expanding the field of tax development and implementing tax administration according to law. On March 22, 2004, the state council issued the Communique on Printing and Distributing Comprehensive Incentive Measures for Law-based Administration, requiring local public administrative departments and departments at all levels to establish the party and implement a high level of administrative management. Governing for the people ensures the process of management according to law, reasonable management, reasonable procedures, efficient and convenient, honest and reliable, and consistent powers and responsibilities. It has established the goals and working guidelines for the tax authorities to administer according to law and to provide quality services.


## 2.1. Basic Information of Tax Collection and Administration

Under the impact of the interaction and change of modern information technology, big data has entered more and more into the field of tax collection and administration, and digital tax management and data management have gradually become the development trend of tax collection and administration. Big data and information technology are indispensable forces to improve the ability of tax collection and administration. With the development of big data, there have been many virtual electronic payment and tax forms on the network, and the process is shown in Figures1 and 2.Figure 1
Tax payment process.Figure 2
Registration process of tax collection and administration.The implementation of a fair tax system may lead to the imbalance of different tax burden levels. In the era of big data, when the tax system is more traditional, there will be some tax evasion or even tax avoidance by individual enterprises and individuals. At this time, the protection of the law is needed to carry out normal taxation.


## 2.2. The Existing Legal Issues in Tax Collection and Administration

There are many legal problems in China’s tax revenue. In recent years, many stars have reported their tax problems, which also reflect the poor supervision of taxpayers in China, the difficulties in the identification of taxable objects under the background of digital economy, and the prominent tax jurisdiction problems and other problems. In the tax law, the meaning and scope of taxpayers are different, which should be made clear in the relevant laws and regulations, and will help to determine the scope of taxation. All citizens in our country must pay taxes according to law. This is the relevant provisions of the Constitution and can be regarded as a constitutional basis, but such provisions are very general and have no more detailed content. The digital economy era has brought more development opportunities, but it also highlights the shortcomings and defects of the current tax law system. Relevant legal systems, whether tax registration or tax management, need to be revised and improved to adapt to the growing market transaction pattern. In fact, under the influence of the rapid development of Internet technology, improving the legal system has become a very urgent and important task.


## 2.3. Tax Collection and Management System in the Era of Big Data

The “big data + tax” model has become the main theme of tax research in the Internet era. A relatively perfect set of tax collection and administration and tax service system can better realize the modernization of tax management, improve the efficiency of tax management, and quickly adapt to the development trend of informatics. In the era of big data, we can establish a unified taxpayer identification number and input it into the tax collection and management system according to a special taxpayer identification number, so as to facilitate the subsequent query when needed. As far as possible, the tax supervision system allows all taxpayers’ personal information to be input into the system, so that the system becomes more flexible and can timely tell taxpayers, the amount of tax to be paid, and tax time. In the interface of the tax collection and management system, the tax payment information is introduced in detail to analyze and process the information involved in the tax payment, which will more easily facilitate the operation of the subsequent taxpayers. In the era of big data, the relevant information of tax needles is abstracted as a traditional transmission and use process to ensure that their information can be conveyed normally and the efficiency of tax collection and management is improved. The tax loss can be reduced through the optimal revenue tax model. The optimal revenue tax model is shown in:(1)maxδx⟶0E∫0∞uσ1h,y1h−s1y1h−k1h,gtudt.With some basic information of tax collection and administration and the basic operation methods applicable to taxpayers, the legitimate rights and interests of taxpayers can be protected through law later, and the correct implementation of tax collection and administration can also be guaranteed through law. Under the condition of market equilibrium, the impact of tax policy on economic growth, two main conclusions are drawn: First, when the government implements a stable tax policy, there is a unique optimal capital stock path for consumers, along which the economy can sustained steady and optimal growth; when the tax path given by the government is unstable but can converge to a constant tax rate, there is also a capital stock path that can make the entire economy grow asymptotically and steadily, and eventually converge to the optimal state. Second, the optimal taxation path has the nature of a great road; that is, all optimal taxation paths will converge to the golden rule tax rate (the tax rate that keeps the economy in a stable and optimal growth state), and the government can adjust appropriately according to the golden rule tax rate tax policy, when the value of the tax plan formulated by the government in a certain period is much lower (or much higher) than the tax rate of the golden rule; an appropriate increase (or decrease) of tax at this time is beneficial to economic growth. This article identifies the income tax model most suitable for tax administration for contemporary problems.


## 2.4. Efficiency of the Tax Collection and Administration System

With the development of information technology, the tax collection and management mode can improve the mode of tax service. However, this cannot fully meet the new needs of new business under the background of big data, especially the deepening of e-commerce market, and the current tax collection and management mode cannot fully meet the needs in management. The advantages and disadvantages will accelerate the speed of tax collection and administration in China, but taxpayers will also show various tax avoidance behaviors through technical means, which makes the work of the tax administration department more difficult. At this stage, information technology can not achieve complex statistical and query operations; taxpayers can not pay taxes directly through the network; tax authorities need to go to the bank to audit data, pay taxes, and deduct taxes; taxpayers can apply for tax payment; and tax authorities themselves do not automatically exchange, which increases the tax process of taxpayers and the workload of tax officials. Tax efficiency can be studied by the variable model. Variable model is shown in(2)DDTBDijt=∂0+∂1TGTPit+∑control+∑company+∑Year+εijt.In China, it aims to obtain the maximum tax revenue at the lowest cost, maximize the economic growth, or apply tax rules to reduce the tax barriers to economic growth. It includes two aspects: tax administrative efficiency and tax economic efficiency. By utilizing the following formula:(3)BTDit=β0+β1TACCit+θi+εit.The possibility of subjective tax avoidance can be calculated by using the difference between pre-tax accounting profit and taxable profit to control tax revenue to the maximum extent. The market economy should be made to work efficiently in the most convenient and simple way possible. All the processes have become more streamlined, and some additional costs have been reduced. This is more conducive to the tax between the user and the country, more convenient and easier to operate.


## 2.5. Legal Principles of Tax Collection and Administration and Network Security Management

As an important part of national e-government, tax informatics has had a profound impact on the reform and renewal of tax management mode, and plays an important role in expanding the field of tax development and implementing tax administration according to law. On March 22, 2004, the state council issued the Communique on Printing and Distributing Comprehensive Incentive Measures for Law-based Administration, requiring local public administrative departments and departments at all levels to establish the party and implement a high level of administrative management. Governing for the people ensures the process of management according to law, reasonable management, reasonable procedures, efficient and convenient, honest and reliable, and consistent powers and responsibilities. It has established the goals and working guidelines for the tax authorities to administer according to law and to provide quality services.


## 3. Positive Model of Tax Avoidance

### 3.1. Golden Tax Phase III and Tax Avoidance Construction

Based on realistic theoretical analysis and variable analysis, the model is described as follows(4)DDTBDijt=∂0+∂1TGTPit+∑control+∑company+∑Year+εijt,where i represents the i province, j represents the j enterprise, t represents the t year, DDTBDijt represents the degree of enterprise tax evasion, TGTPit represents the virtual variable of the golden tax phase three project (if i province in the t year, the “Golden Tax phase three” project tested on TGTP is designated as 1, if not, set to 0). In this model formula, we mainly focus on the coefficient DDTBDijt and the significance level. If the coefficient is significantly negative, it shows that tax collection and administration inhibit the tax avoidance activities of enterprises. Tax collection is a compulsory free and relatively fixed distribution of social products by the state in order to meet the public needs of the society. For taxpayers, it is neither repaid directly nor at any cost, which prompts taxpayers to reduce their own taxes. In order to make this wish come true, taxpayers will show different choices. Some people will evade taxes, owe taxes, refuse to pay taxes, avoid taxes and save taxes. Tax avoidance and tax saving are relatively safe or safe methods. Tax evasion is illegal, so everyone will avoid taxes subjectively.


### 3.2. Tax Avoidance and Nonefficiency Investment Model

Nonefficiency investment (INEI), excessive investment (OVEREI), and insufficient investment (LESSEI) are taken as the explanatory variables, and the degree of corporate tax avoidance (DDTBD) is taken as the main explanatory variable. Build a mathematical model, as shown in formulaM:
(5)INEIijt=∂0+DDTBDijt+∑control+∑company+∑Year+εijt,(6)OVEREIijt=∂0+DDTBDijt+∑control+∑company+∑Year+εijt,(7)LESSEIijt=∂0+DDTBDijt+∑control+∑company+∑Year+εijt,where j represents the j th enterprise and t indicates the year t. Considering the impact of major events at the individual level and year on tax avoidance behavior, this paper controls for the individual effects and time-fixed effects “company” and “year.” This paper mainly focuses on the coefficient and significance of the tax avoidance degree DDTBDijt. If the coefficient is significantly positive, the tax avoidance activity leads to inefficient investment behavior. Tax avoidance can adjust the relationship between nonefficient investments. The promotion of the third phase of the golden tax has improved the taxation authority’s collection and management capabilities, strengthened the external control mechanism for enterprises, and indirectly played a role in corporate governance, helping to reduce taxes. Avoid the agency costs brought about by the fund tax avoidance, or the over-investment or under-investment caused by conservative tax avoidance, thereby reducing inefficient investment.


### 3.3. Difference Model of Tax Avoidance

This paper therefore adopts the “tax difference” (BTD) to directly reflect the tax burden. It is generally believed that the greater the difference between pre-tax accounting profit and taxable profit, the greater the possibility of subjective tax avoidance. The tax meeting difference (BTD) can be calculated using the following formulas:(8)BTDit=β0+β1TACCit+θi+εit,(9)DDBTDit=θi+εit.Through formulas (8) and (9), it is known that the overall accrued income can be used to measure surplus management, and DDBTD is used to measure the true tax avoidance degree of enterprises. The dummy variables and tax avoidance variables of the Golden Tax Phase III Project can be used as dependent variables to construct a regulatory effect model, such as formulas (10), (11), (12):
(10)INEIijt=∂0+∂1TGTPjt+∂2DDTBDijt+∂3TGTPjt∗DDTBDijt+∑controlijt+∑company+∑year+εijt,(11)OVEREIijt=∂0+∂1TGTPjt+∂2DDTBDijt+∂3TGTPjt∗DDTBDijt+∑controlijt+∑company+∑year+εijt,(12)LESSEIijt=∂0+∂1TGTPjt+∂2DDTBDijt+∂3TGTPjt∗DDTBDijt+∑controlijt+∑company+∑year+εijt.


### 3.4. Tax Classification Model

In order to improve the correct rate of tax, the classification results are used to establish a correct rate model, and the following formula is used to calculate the correct rate.(13)Precision=TP+TNTP+FP+FN+TN,(14)Accuracy=TPTP+FP,(15)Recall=TPTP+FN,(16)F−Measure=2∗Precision∗RecallPrecision+Recall.


### 3.5. Tax Equilibrium Problem Model

If the government assumes that it taxes consumer income and invests some of it in consumer goods, consumers will always benefit from the government’s public spending. Considering the behavior of these three business representatives, the equilibrium economic problem model is calculated as:(17)kih=yih−siyih−cih−kih.Through the optimal revenue tax model,(18)maxδx⟶0E∫0∞uσ1h,y1h−s1y1h−k1h,gtudt.We can discuss its more general form with the following formula(19)y1h−s1y1h−k1h,gt∈L∗M∗N∗G.This expression is a feasibility constraint.(20)∀h,h1∈H∫0∞uσ1h,y1h−s1y1h−k1h,gtudt≥∫0∞uσ1h,y1h−s1y1h−k1h,gtudt.The formula suggests to maximize the desired utility of a lifetime.For each variableh, the conditions satisfied are shown in formula (21)
(21)Es1y1h≥gi.This is a government budgetary constraint; this means that for a robust tax collection process, the expected tax value for each period will be sufficient to cover the government’s spending on supplying goods to the public. When a spatial equilibrium model exists, the equilibrium model can be redefined using the integral form of the probability distribution, as shown in the following formulas:(22)y1h−s1y1h−k1h,gt∈L∗M∗N∗G,(23)∀h,h1∈H,Φh,y1h−s1y1h−k1h,gt≥Φh,y1h−s1y1h−k1h,gt,(24)∫syhdθh≥g.ForC,D,g, due to measurable options that meet financial constraints, the best choice problem of the government public sector mechanism can be defined as:
(25)maxδx⟶0∫∂Ψh,C,D,gd∂h.The model is designed through the economic equilibrium mechanism, and the formula is defined as follows:(26)maxδx⟶0∫∂Ψh,k1h,y1h,s1y1h,gd∂h.For the consumer, the objective is to maximize lifetime expected utility under government budget constraints, defined by the formula(27)maxδx⟶0E∫∂Ψh,k1h,y1h,gdt.Assuming that the government does not know about the consumer and only evaluates the taxes he must pay based on his income, his budget constraint or equation of state is(28)k1h=y1h−siyih−cih−kih.


## 3.1. Golden Tax Phase III and Tax Avoidance Construction

Based on realistic theoretical analysis and variable analysis, the model is described as follows(4)DDTBDijt=∂0+∂1TGTPit+∑control+∑company+∑Year+εijt,where i represents the i province, j represents the j enterprise, t represents the t year, DDTBDijt represents the degree of enterprise tax evasion, TGTPit represents the virtual variable of the golden tax phase three project (if i province in the t year, the “Golden Tax phase three” project tested on TGTP is designated as 1, if not, set to 0). In this model formula, we mainly focus on the coefficient DDTBDijt and the significance level. If the coefficient is significantly negative, it shows that tax collection and administration inhibit the tax avoidance activities of enterprises. Tax collection is a compulsory free and relatively fixed distribution of social products by the state in order to meet the public needs of the society. For taxpayers, it is neither repaid directly nor at any cost, which prompts taxpayers to reduce their own taxes. In order to make this wish come true, taxpayers will show different choices. Some people will evade taxes, owe taxes, refuse to pay taxes, avoid taxes and save taxes. Tax avoidance and tax saving are relatively safe or safe methods. Tax evasion is illegal, so everyone will avoid taxes subjectively.


## 3.2. Tax Avoidance and Nonefficiency Investment Model

Nonefficiency investment (INEI), excessive investment (OVEREI), and insufficient investment (LESSEI) are taken as the explanatory variables, and the degree of corporate tax avoidance (DDTBD) is taken as the main explanatory variable. Build a mathematical model, as shown in formulaM:
(5)INEIijt=∂0+DDTBDijt+∑control+∑company+∑Year+εijt,(6)OVEREIijt=∂0+DDTBDijt+∑control+∑company+∑Year+εijt,(7)LESSEIijt=∂0+DDTBDijt+∑control+∑company+∑Year+εijt,where j represents the j th enterprise and t indicates the year t. Considering the impact of major events at the individual level and year on tax avoidance behavior, this paper controls for the individual effects and time-fixed effects “company” and “year.” This paper mainly focuses on the coefficient and significance of the tax avoidance degree DDTBDijt. If the coefficient is significantly positive, the tax avoidance activity leads to inefficient investment behavior. Tax avoidance can adjust the relationship between nonefficient investments. The promotion of the third phase of the golden tax has improved the taxation authority’s collection and management capabilities, strengthened the external control mechanism for enterprises, and indirectly played a role in corporate governance, helping to reduce taxes. Avoid the agency costs brought about by the fund tax avoidance, or the over-investment or under-investment caused by conservative tax avoidance, thereby reducing inefficient investment.


## 3.3. Difference Model of Tax Avoidance

This paper therefore adopts the “tax difference” (BTD) to directly reflect the tax burden. It is generally believed that the greater the difference between pre-tax accounting profit and taxable profit, the greater the possibility of subjective tax avoidance. The tax meeting difference (BTD) can be calculated using the following formulas:(8)BTDit=β0+β1TACCit+θi+εit,(9)DDBTDit=θi+εit.Through formulas (8) and (9), it is known that the overall accrued income can be used to measure surplus management, and DDBTD is used to measure the true tax avoidance degree of enterprises. The dummy variables and tax avoidance variables of the Golden Tax Phase III Project can be used as dependent variables to construct a regulatory effect model, such as formulas (10), (11), (12):
(10)INEIijt=∂0+∂1TGTPjt+∂2DDTBDijt+∂3TGTPjt∗DDTBDijt+∑controlijt+∑company+∑year+εijt,(11)OVEREIijt=∂0+∂1TGTPjt+∂2DDTBDijt+∂3TGTPjt∗DDTBDijt+∑controlijt+∑company+∑year+εijt,(12)LESSEIijt=∂0+∂1TGTPjt+∂2DDTBDijt+∂3TGTPjt∗DDTBDijt+∑controlijt+∑company+∑year+εijt.


## 3.4. Tax Classification Model

In order to improve the correct rate of tax, the classification results are used to establish a correct rate model, and the following formula is used to calculate the correct rate.(13)Precision=TP+TNTP+FP+FN+TN,(14)Accuracy=TPTP+FP,(15)Recall=TPTP+FN,(16)F−Measure=2∗Precision∗RecallPrecision+Recall.


## 3.5. Tax Equilibrium Problem Model

If the government assumes that it taxes consumer income and invests some of it in consumer goods, consumers will always benefit from the government’s public spending. Considering the behavior of these three business representatives, the equilibrium economic problem model is calculated as:(17)kih=yih−siyih−cih−kih.Through the optimal revenue tax model,(18)maxδx⟶0E∫0∞uσ1h,y1h−s1y1h−k1h,gtudt.We can discuss its more general form with the following formula(19)y1h−s1y1h−k1h,gt∈L∗M∗N∗G.This expression is a feasibility constraint.(20)∀h,h1∈H∫0∞uσ1h,y1h−s1y1h−k1h,gtudt≥∫0∞uσ1h,y1h−s1y1h−k1h,gtudt.The formula suggests to maximize the desired utility of a lifetime.For each variableh, the conditions satisfied are shown in formula (21)
(21)Es1y1h≥gi.This is a government budgetary constraint; this means that for a robust tax collection process, the expected tax value for each period will be sufficient to cover the government’s spending on supplying goods to the public. When a spatial equilibrium model exists, the equilibrium model can be redefined using the integral form of the probability distribution, as shown in the following formulas:(22)y1h−s1y1h−k1h,gt∈L∗M∗N∗G,(23)∀h,h1∈H,Φh,y1h−s1y1h−k1h,gt≥Φh,y1h−s1y1h−k1h,gt,(24)∫syhdθh≥g.ForC,D,g, due to measurable options that meet financial constraints, the best choice problem of the government public sector mechanism can be defined as:
(25)maxδx⟶0∫∂Ψh,C,D,gd∂h.The model is designed through the economic equilibrium mechanism, and the formula is defined as follows:(26)maxδx⟶0∫∂Ψh,k1h,y1h,s1y1h,gd∂h.For the consumer, the objective is to maximize lifetime expected utility under government budget constraints, defined by the formula(27)maxδx⟶0E∫∂Ψh,k1h,y1h,gdt.Assuming that the government does not know about the consumer and only evaluates the taxes he must pay based on his income, his budget constraint or equation of state is(28)k1h=y1h−siyih−cih−kih.


## 4. Research on Tax Collection and Administration Mode

### 4.1. Tax Collection and Management Mode in the Era of Big Data

Since 1950, China’s tax collection and management mode have undergone two changes, including three development modes. Two transformations refer to the first transformation: In 1985, China abolished the tax collection and management system, and widely implemented the “administrative system” of separation of management and examination. Tax registration system, tax declaration, and tax inspection are the components of tax collection and management system; in the era of big data, our tax and management system is slowly moving from “management” to “numerical control.” The above three kinds of collection management, conventional collection management form is mainly “family budget management system” and “case management system”, and data collection management system is “number management system”; compared with “management system,”, the “number management system” focuses on using a lot of data to solve the problem of the data inconsistency, it standardizes the flow of information as the main line, data analysis is the key, and it is the combination of manual processing and computer processing. The comparison of tax collection and administration modes in different periods is shown in Table1:Table 1
Comparison of tax collection and administration modes in different periods.
Stage divisionStage IStage IIPhase IIIPhase IVLife periodThe planning economy period, 19851985-19971997-20092009-the futureCharacteristics of the timesAgricultural eraIndustrial ageThe internet eraInformation ageCollection and management modeManagement household systemSteward systemSteward systemTube number systemCollection and management proceduresCapital processOperation flowOperation flowInformation flowCollection and management meansHand operationHand operationComputer + databaseBig data technologyCollection and management modeTax administrators manage householdsCollection, management, inspection and phase separation“Thirty-four words”Policy“Thirty-four character” policy + “strengthen management”


### 4.2. Tax Collection and Administration Mode under the Condition of American Informatization

The tax management model in the USA can be summarized as follows: The content of tax service includes taxpayer’s self-statement, in-process monitoring, tax-related protection, post-inspection, and tax management. We should scientifically and comprehensively meet the needs of taxpayers; determine development strategies, business rules, and organizational structure; and strengthen performance appraisal.According to Figure3, the revenue department e-file usage rate is increasing year by year, indicating the increasingly mature tax collection and administration model in the USA. Part of the reason is that in 1998, the federal taxation bureau reorganized the national tax collection and administration information agencies, relying on the computer network across the country, relying on computer information technology, covering from tax sources, tax authorities, tax authorities, tax returns, tax, tax returns, tax inspection to the whole process of tax inspection, personnel administration.Figure 3
IRS e-file usage ratio history graph.


### 4.3. Macro Performance of Tax Payment Data under the Tax Collection and Administration Mode

Data analysis is carried out on the taxpayer's tax category statistical table through Figure4. The table shows the statistical results, the taxpayer's withhold of information tax, or tax evasion. On the premise of a comprehensive and detailed grasp of all tax laws and regulations, we understand the taxpayer's industry and specific transactions. After the general audit procedure, it is impossible to make an accurate judgment on whether the taxpayer has failed to pay the tax. In order to analyze the tax situation of taxpayers, Figure 4 counts the number of tax types and the number of people who pay taxes. There is no connection between the two. Taxpayers want to pay taxes and their jobs are related, so it is normal for different people to pay different taxes and different amounts of taxes. The type of taxpayer’s tax payment is related to whether the taxpayer has concealed tax returns or tax evasion. The type of tax that the taxpayer needs to pay and the amount of tax to be paid by the taxpayer is related to his work. Therefore, there is no difference between the number of tax types and the number of taxpayers. What is the relationship, so the height of the two is different.Figure 4
Tax payment data sheet.In the audit of tax collection and management, in order to obtain the necessary external data in time (such as industrial and commercial registration data, real estate registration data, engineering construction information data, etc.), auditors need to analyze the reported data itself through the tax collection and management system, and have doubts about the problem, even if a table is self-relevant, they also need to draw audit conclusions. If we need to get the error problem of storage level, we often need to analyze the data and make some manual judgments. In the face of the deed tax collection audit, it is also facing such a problem. Therefore, from the survey data in the first quarter (Table2), second quarter (Table 3), and third quarter (Table 4), it can be seen that the taxes paid are basically consistent, and the tax rates and corresponding taxes involved in the deed tax returns are also seen and analyzed.Table 2
Tax statistics for the first quarter.
Tax item tableTotal tax paymentContract tax236, 521Income tax for individuals123, 362Added value tax213, 233City planning tax123, 548Education fee34, 265Stamp duty52, 451Building taxes33, 372Vehicle and vessel tax22, 668Business income taxes3, 880Increment tax on land value162, 662Table 3
Tax statistics for the second quarter.
Tax item tableTotal tax paymentContract tax152, 463Building taxes54, 231Business income taxes24, 621Income tax for individuals54, 361Added value tax12, 364Increment tax on land value23, 233Town land use tax12, 433Stamp duty456, 123Vehicle and vessel tax456, 133Additional local education154, 362Table 4
Tax statistics for the third quarter.
Tax item tableTotal tax paymentContract tax213, 046Added value tax63, 251Building taxes56, 223Vehicle and vessel tax14, 523Stamp duty12, 546Increment tax on land value15, 426Additional local education21, 532Town land use tax56, 956City planning tax21, 364Income tax for individuals15, 426Compared with the first quarter, deed tax and personal income tax decreased relatively, while vehicle and ship tax increased relatively. Thus, different quarters of the tax paid will have a relatively large change.In the third quarter, the deed tax had a trend of significant increase, and the vehicle and vessel tax were significantly reduced under the high risk in the second quarter. In different quarters, the tax situation will change due to the personal travel situation.Without knowing the relevant rules, the association rule algorithm is the most classic example of shopping cart analysis to find the relationship between item sets in a large number of data, so the VAT, deed tax, consumption tax, enterprise income tax, and personal income tax of the current quarter are selected as the key taxes to see the taxpayer's declaration and payment. This is shown in Figure5.Figure 5
Comparison of tax values in the third quarter.In the tax collection and management system, because many external data need to be analyzed by auditors through the tax collection and management system to find out the problem in time, so people need to make manual judgments while reanalyzing the data. The data in the machine can only represent the information part of the big data, and when those people actually arrive at the scene, there may be some accidents, which need to be solved manually.


### 4.4. Analysis of Nonefficient Investment by Tax Avoidance

Secondly, the degree of marketization of state-owned enterprises is relatively low. Since the ultimate controller of state-owned enterprises is the state, the internal proxy problem and the internal and external information asymmetry problem are relatively more serious. Tax collection and administration can not only play the role of corporate governance to restrain nonefficient investment, but also lead to the capital outflow of enterprises to some extent to cause insufficient investment. Therefore, these two opposite effects offset each other, so there is no obvious impact on nonefficient investment. Because of the influence of tax avoidance on unproductive investment, under different financing constraints, there are both “increasing agency cost effect" and "reducing financing pressure effect”; the promotion of tax collection and management strength plays a “corporate governance effect”; for tax avoidance, the “agency cost increase effect” plays a role of mitigation and regulation, and ultimately reduces the level of over-investment and inefficient investment behavior. Therefore, there is reasonable to believe that the impact of tax avoidance on nonefficiency investment will different, as shown in Table5.Table 5
Differences in enterprise nonefficiency investment.
ProjectPrivate enterprisesState-owned enterpriseVariable nameINEIOVEREILESSEIINEIOVEREILESSEIDDBTD2.6711.771-1.7852.6323.451-2.614Controlled variableYesYesYesYesYesYesObservations2.2501.9361.8423.0771.2561.888r-squared0.1130.2780.4250.2320.0360.182Company PEYesYesYesYesYesYesYear PEYesYesYesYesYesYes


### 4.5. Tax Circumvention and Legal Risks

Legal risk has a negative inhibitory effect on the tax avoidance activities of enterprises. Enterprises that have litigation violations will be strictly supervised by the administrative regulatory departments, which increases the cost of tax avoidance and increases the tax risks. Legal risk will bring to the enterprise including reputation loss and financing pressure, standardize the internal tax management, can make the enterprise in the short term to market social responsibility, and play a high marginal benefit; the enterprise risk management culture will promote company management to adopt robust tax policy to deal with the adverse impact of legal risk and reputation risk.In the regression results of the variables in Table6, corporate profitability (ROA) and all three tax avoidance indicators are significantly positively correlated at the 1% confidence level; this indicates that the stronger the corporate profitability, the greater the motivation to reduce the tax burden, the higher the tax avoidance. Enterprise solvency (LEV), enterprise size (SIZE), chairman and CEO portfolio (dual), and enterprise value (Tobin Q) and tax avoidance index regression coefficient at 1% confidence level are negative, and this shows that under the legal risk, the stronger the solvency, the larger the asset scale; the executive board independence and enterprise market value development prospects will significantly reduce enterprise tax avoidance. In addition, manipulative accrued profit (DA), investment opportunities (BM) and fixed asset density (PPE) will also affect tax aversion to some extent.Table 6
The regression table of legal risks and tax avoidance.
DDBTDBTDRateVariablesCoefficientT priceCoefficientT priceCoefficientT priceLitr-0.003-3.137-0.003-3.201-0.009-2.519LEV-0.016-3.082-0.022-4.130-0.052-2.537ROA0.22014.2300.27418.9200.5389.417Size-0.005-4.451-0.066-5.450-0.022-4.632BM-0.003-0.732-0.003-0.865-0.066-4.365Dual-0.003-2.314-0.003-2.043-0.003-0.578Relation-0.003-0.124-0.003-1.0320.0000.033DA-0.006-0.8300.0132.5310.0502.467Tobin Q-0.016-3.201-0.002-3.051-0.011-4.528PPE0.000-0.005-0.007-0.801-0.072-2.255Constant0.1144.4650.1575.8070.5735.515YearControlControlControlIndControlControlControlN5.3315.3315.331R-squared0.0780.1350.061


## 4.1. Tax Collection and Management Mode in the Era of Big Data

Since 1950, China’s tax collection and management mode have undergone two changes, including three development modes. Two transformations refer to the first transformation: In 1985, China abolished the tax collection and management system, and widely implemented the “administrative system” of separation of management and examination. Tax registration system, tax declaration, and tax inspection are the components of tax collection and management system; in the era of big data, our tax and management system is slowly moving from “management” to “numerical control.” The above three kinds of collection management, conventional collection management form is mainly “family budget management system” and “case management system”, and data collection management system is “number management system”; compared with “management system,”, the “number management system” focuses on using a lot of data to solve the problem of the data inconsistency, it standardizes the flow of information as the main line, data analysis is the key, and it is the combination of manual processing and computer processing. The comparison of tax collection and administration modes in different periods is shown in Table1:Table 1
Comparison of tax collection and administration modes in different periods.
Stage divisionStage IStage IIPhase IIIPhase IVLife periodThe planning economy period, 19851985-19971997-20092009-the futureCharacteristics of the timesAgricultural eraIndustrial ageThe internet eraInformation ageCollection and management modeManagement household systemSteward systemSteward systemTube number systemCollection and management proceduresCapital processOperation flowOperation flowInformation flowCollection and management meansHand operationHand operationComputer + databaseBig data technologyCollection and management modeTax administrators manage householdsCollection, management, inspection and phase separation“Thirty-four words”Policy“Thirty-four character” policy + “strengthen management”


## 4.2. Tax Collection and Administration Mode under the Condition of American Informatization

The tax management model in the USA can be summarized as follows: The content of tax service includes taxpayer’s self-statement, in-process monitoring, tax-related protection, post-inspection, and tax management. We should scientifically and comprehensively meet the needs of taxpayers; determine development strategies, business rules, and organizational structure; and strengthen performance appraisal.According to Figure3, the revenue department e-file usage rate is increasing year by year, indicating the increasingly mature tax collection and administration model in the USA. Part of the reason is that in 1998, the federal taxation bureau reorganized the national tax collection and administration information agencies, relying on the computer network across the country, relying on computer information technology, covering from tax sources, tax authorities, tax authorities, tax returns, tax, tax returns, tax inspection to the whole process of tax inspection, personnel administration.Figure 3
IRS e-file usage ratio history graph.


## 4.3. Macro Performance of Tax Payment Data under the Tax Collection and Administration Mode

Data analysis is carried out on the taxpayer's tax category statistical table through Figure4. The table shows the statistical results, the taxpayer's withhold of information tax, or tax evasion. On the premise of a comprehensive and detailed grasp of all tax laws and regulations, we understand the taxpayer's industry and specific transactions. After the general audit procedure, it is impossible to make an accurate judgment on whether the taxpayer has failed to pay the tax. In order to analyze the tax situation of taxpayers, Figure 4 counts the number of tax types and the number of people who pay taxes. There is no connection between the two. Taxpayers want to pay taxes and their jobs are related, so it is normal for different people to pay different taxes and different amounts of taxes. The type of taxpayer’s tax payment is related to whether the taxpayer has concealed tax returns or tax evasion. The type of tax that the taxpayer needs to pay and the amount of tax to be paid by the taxpayer is related to his work. Therefore, there is no difference between the number of tax types and the number of taxpayers. What is the relationship, so the height of the two is different.Figure 4
Tax payment data sheet.In the audit of tax collection and management, in order to obtain the necessary external data in time (such as industrial and commercial registration data, real estate registration data, engineering construction information data, etc.), auditors need to analyze the reported data itself through the tax collection and management system, and have doubts about the problem, even if a table is self-relevant, they also need to draw audit conclusions. If we need to get the error problem of storage level, we often need to analyze the data and make some manual judgments. In the face of the deed tax collection audit, it is also facing such a problem. Therefore, from the survey data in the first quarter (Table2), second quarter (Table 3), and third quarter (Table 4), it can be seen that the taxes paid are basically consistent, and the tax rates and corresponding taxes involved in the deed tax returns are also seen and analyzed.Table 2
Tax statistics for the first quarter.
Tax item tableTotal tax paymentContract tax236, 521Income tax for individuals123, 362Added value tax213, 233City planning tax123, 548Education fee34, 265Stamp duty52, 451Building taxes33, 372Vehicle and vessel tax22, 668Business income taxes3, 880Increment tax on land value162, 662Table 3
Tax statistics for the second quarter.
Tax item tableTotal tax paymentContract tax152, 463Building taxes54, 231Business income taxes24, 621Income tax for individuals54, 361Added value tax12, 364Increment tax on land value23, 233Town land use tax12, 433Stamp duty456, 123Vehicle and vessel tax456, 133Additional local education154, 362Table 4
Tax statistics for the third quarter.
Tax item tableTotal tax paymentContract tax213, 046Added value tax63, 251Building taxes56, 223Vehicle and vessel tax14, 523Stamp duty12, 546Increment tax on land value15, 426Additional local education21, 532Town land use tax56, 956City planning tax21, 364Income tax for individuals15, 426Compared with the first quarter, deed tax and personal income tax decreased relatively, while vehicle and ship tax increased relatively. Thus, different quarters of the tax paid will have a relatively large change.In the third quarter, the deed tax had a trend of significant increase, and the vehicle and vessel tax were significantly reduced under the high risk in the second quarter. In different quarters, the tax situation will change due to the personal travel situation.Without knowing the relevant rules, the association rule algorithm is the most classic example of shopping cart analysis to find the relationship between item sets in a large number of data, so the VAT, deed tax, consumption tax, enterprise income tax, and personal income tax of the current quarter are selected as the key taxes to see the taxpayer's declaration and payment. This is shown in Figure5.Figure 5
Comparison of tax values in the third quarter.In the tax collection and management system, because many external data need to be analyzed by auditors through the tax collection and management system to find out the problem in time, so people need to make manual judgments while reanalyzing the data. The data in the machine can only represent the information part of the big data, and when those people actually arrive at the scene, there may be some accidents, which need to be solved manually.


## 4.4. Analysis of Nonefficient Investment by Tax Avoidance

Secondly, the degree of marketization of state-owned enterprises is relatively low. Since the ultimate controller of state-owned enterprises is the state, the internal proxy problem and the internal and external information asymmetry problem are relatively more serious. Tax collection and administration can not only play the role of corporate governance to restrain nonefficient investment, but also lead to the capital outflow of enterprises to some extent to cause insufficient investment. Therefore, these two opposite effects offset each other, so there is no obvious impact on nonefficient investment. Because of the influence of tax avoidance on unproductive investment, under different financing constraints, there are both “increasing agency cost effect" and "reducing financing pressure effect”; the promotion of tax collection and management strength plays a “corporate governance effect”; for tax avoidance, the “agency cost increase effect” plays a role of mitigation and regulation, and ultimately reduces the level of over-investment and inefficient investment behavior. Therefore, there is reasonable to believe that the impact of tax avoidance on nonefficiency investment will different, as shown in Table5.Table 5
Differences in enterprise nonefficiency investment.
ProjectPrivate enterprisesState-owned enterpriseVariable nameINEIOVEREILESSEIINEIOVEREILESSEIDDBTD2.6711.771-1.7852.6323.451-2.614Controlled variableYesYesYesYesYesYesObservations2.2501.9361.8423.0771.2561.888r-squared0.1130.2780.4250.2320.0360.182Company PEYesYesYesYesYesYesYear PEYesYesYesYesYesYes


## 4.5. Tax Circumvention and Legal Risks

Legal risk has a negative inhibitory effect on the tax avoidance activities of enterprises. Enterprises that have litigation violations will be strictly supervised by the administrative regulatory departments, which increases the cost of tax avoidance and increases the tax risks. Legal risk will bring to the enterprise including reputation loss and financing pressure, standardize the internal tax management, can make the enterprise in the short term to market social responsibility, and play a high marginal benefit; the enterprise risk management culture will promote company management to adopt robust tax policy to deal with the adverse impact of legal risk and reputation risk.In the regression results of the variables in Table6, corporate profitability (ROA) and all three tax avoidance indicators are significantly positively correlated at the 1% confidence level; this indicates that the stronger the corporate profitability, the greater the motivation to reduce the tax burden, the higher the tax avoidance. Enterprise solvency (LEV), enterprise size (SIZE), chairman and CEO portfolio (dual), and enterprise value (Tobin Q) and tax avoidance index regression coefficient at 1% confidence level are negative, and this shows that under the legal risk, the stronger the solvency, the larger the asset scale; the executive board independence and enterprise market value development prospects will significantly reduce enterprise tax avoidance. In addition, manipulative accrued profit (DA), investment opportunities (BM) and fixed asset density (PPE) will also affect tax aversion to some extent.Table 6
The regression table of legal risks and tax avoidance.
DDBTDBTDRateVariablesCoefficientT priceCoefficientT priceCoefficientT priceLitr-0.003-3.137-0.003-3.201-0.009-2.519LEV-0.016-3.082-0.022-4.130-0.052-2.537ROA0.22014.2300.27418.9200.5389.417Size-0.005-4.451-0.066-5.450-0.022-4.632BM-0.003-0.732-0.003-0.865-0.066-4.365Dual-0.003-2.314-0.003-2.043-0.003-0.578Relation-0.003-0.124-0.003-1.0320.0000.033DA-0.006-0.8300.0132.5310.0502.467Tobin Q-0.016-3.201-0.002-3.051-0.011-4.528PPE0.000-0.005-0.007-0.801-0.072-2.255Constant0.1144.4650.1575.8070.5735.515YearControlControlControlIndControlControlControlN5.3315.3315.331R-squared0.0780.1350.061


## 5. Conclusion

The massive sample size and high dimensionality of big data bring unique computing and statistical challenges. Now, there are more data stored through the Internet every second than that stored on the whole Internet 20 years ago. People can conduct some basic problem analysis of the application of tax collection and administration and legal issues through big data. An important determinant of irregularity in a country is its tax enforcement capacity, and in this paper, I assess the quantitative impact of incomplete tax enforcement on the total output and productivity. The empirical results show that there is a certain degree of interregional tax competition, and tax centralization increases the effective tax rate and offset the impact of tax. Standardizing tax collection and administration is of great significance to improve the tax collection and administration system and promote the formation of a fair and orderly market competition order. Under the background of urban-rural integration, it is urgent to adjust the tax concept, reconstruct the scope of tax, scientifically design the tax rate, and simplify the tax collection and administration procedures to have a regulating effect on the unified market of urban and rural construction land in China. Over the past decade, some problems have been exposed in the implementation of the tax collection and administration law, which have affected the collection of tax to a certain extent. It is necessary to revise the tax collection and administration law. At the same time, the implementation of the administrative law enforcement law has posed new challenges to tax law enforcement, and it also needs to revise the tax collection and administration law. This paper discusses some important legal issues of revising the tax collection and administration law and puts forward the corresponding ideas. We study whether tax aggressiveness will reduce the motivation and opportunities for active tax management in the era of big data. Specifically, different institutional settings in China are used to study whether tax aggression in China is affected by the limitations of big data. This paper proves the tax collection and management mode studied in this paper, so that taxpayers can pay taxes more conveniently and quickly, and puts forward the method of improving the tax collection and management system. Although the taxation supervision system can be perfected, it may not be perfect enough to give people the most intuitive answers, so we should consider more humane issues when improving the comprehensiveness of these systems.



---

*Source: 6578964-2022-09-14.xml*