# Sources of Nitrogen Pollution in Upstream of Fenhe River Reservoir Based on the Nitrogen and Oxygen Stable Isotope

Authors: Ying Zhao; Jinhua Dang; Fei Wang
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

Identification of nitrate sources is important for the management of rivers. In this study, stable isotopes (δ15N and δ18O) and a Bayesian model (stable isotope analysis in R, SIAR) were applied to identify nitrate sources and estimate the proportional contributions of multiple nitrate sources in the upstream of Fenhe River Reservoir that serves as a source of drinking water in Shanxi Province of North China. The results showed that the 86.4% of total nitrogen (TN) concentrations in the water samples exceeded the guided values of the Chinese Surface Water Environmental Quality Standard (GB 3838-2002). The influent of tributary and discharges of sewage caused the severe nitrogen pollution. SIAR was used to estimate the proportional contribution of three nitrate sources (sewage, inorganic fertilizer, and soil nitrogen). It was revealed that domestic sewage was the dominant nitrate source, and the contributions were 33%–41%. The contributions of inorganic fertilizer and soil to nitrogen load were 30%–31% and 31%–37%, respectively. Therefore, the pollution sources of nitrogen can be determined more accurately if the rules of sewage discharges are considered.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

As an important life element, nitrogen is the main substance used for protein synthesis during phytoplankton growth. However, water eutrophication that was caused by nitrogen and other nutrients and its harm to aquatic ecosystems have become one of the key issues of concern to society [1, 2]. Nitrate is the main form of nitrogen contaminants that occur in freshwater bodies. In recent years, the excessive use of agricultural fertilizers, the discharge of large amounts of domestic sewage, and animal manure have caused the nitrate content in freshwater bodies to be abnormally high, which poses a potential threat to the health of humans [3, 4]. In order to control the nitrogen source pollution in water bodies, identification of the pollution load caused by different sources of pollution that enter the water bodies is considered as an effective approach to help prevent and address the pollution in water bodies [5].With the rapid development of isotope technology, nitrogen and oxygen isotope techniques (δ15N and δ18O) are often used to determine the source of nitrate in the water body. Quantitative studies on nitrogen from different sources are carried out using mathematical models. Some frequently employed models include the stable isotope mixture model, a Bayesian model (stable isotope analysis in R, SIAR), and IsoSource model. Parnell et al. [6] established the SIAR mixture model, which used a logical priori distribution of the Dirichlet distribution established via the Bayesian framework, according to the estimated probability of the contribution rate of each source in the mixture. The model, which has been successfully applied to the analysis of nitrate sources, considered the identification of more potential sources of pollution and reduced the uncertainty of the mass mixture model. For example, it has been conducted to identify the contribution rate of different sources of nitrate nitrogen in a subtropical watershed, the groundwater, the rainfall runoff, the river, as well as in the Three Gorges Reservoir of China [3, 7–10].As the largest reservoir in Shanxi Province, the Fenhe River Reservoir is also the biggest centralized drinking water source in Taiyuan. The reservoir is located in the upstream section of the mainstream of the Fenhe River and has a drainage basin area of 5,268 km2. At present, the daily domestic water supply in Taiyuan is about 600,000 m3/d, accounting for 43% of the total water supply. The Fenhe River Reservoir is a river-type reservoir, in which water is mainly replenished by the upstream river, and the Yellow River Transfer Project accounts for about 45% of the replenished water. This study analyzes the source of nitrates and explores the possible migration and transformation of nitrogen by analyzing the nitrogen and oxygen isotope characteristics in the water bodies. The contribution rates of nitrogen sources are estimated based on the SIAR mass mixture model. The results will facilitate the water quality control and the effective use of water resources for improved tracing and quantitation of nitrogen pollution sources in the surface water environment.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Study Area

The upstream of Fenhe River Reservoir has a total length of 216 kilometers and a drainage basin area of 7750 km2. The Fenhe River Reservoir covers an area of 5268 km2, belonging to Ningwu county, Jingle county, Lan county, and Loufan county, which accounts for 78.6% of the total area of four counties. The length of mainstream for the upper course of Fenhe River Reservoir is 122 km, and 13 tributaries are included. Each area of Honghe River, Dongnian River, Lanhe River, and Jianhe River, which were defined as the first level branches, is more than 500 km2. The study area has four distinctive seasons, with an average temperature and relative humidity of 7.2°C and 60.1%. About 180–200 days in the year are frost-free. The distribution of precipitation is 465 mm, which occurred mostly from July to September. Thus, its wet season is defined between July and September, while the dry season is from November to March of the next year.


### 2.2. Sample Collection and Measurement

Water samples were collected at 13 sampling points in the Fenhe River Reservoir and the upstream section of the river. The specific layout and positions are shown in Figure1. The sampling time of the wet and dry seasons is in the periods of August 21st–25th and November 15th–19th, respectively. As the aim of this study was to explore the sources of nitrogen pollution, we set the sampling sites mainly considering the influent pollutants to Fenhe River based on the state controlling sites. According to previous site investigation, there was nitrogen pollution in the middle section, and the sampling sites were less correspondingly.Figure 1
Locations of the sampling sites in study area. S1: Leiming Temple; S2: the entrance to Yellow River water diversion junction of Toumaying village; S3: the outlet of Yellow River water diversion junction of Toumaying village; S4: the junction of Honghe River; S5: Mingshuihe River; S6: Jingle county; S7: Dongnianhe River; S8: Hecha village; S9: Quli county; S10: the inlet of Fenhe Reservoir; S11: the middle part of Fenhe Reservoir; S12: the outlet of Fenhe Reservoir; S13: Jianhe River Bridge.The collected water samples were stored separately in 500 mL polyethylene bottles that were prerinsed with distilled water and were then put into a portable incubator for temporary storage. The water temperature (T), pH, electric conductivity (ORP), and dissolved oxygen (DO) in the water body were measured using a portable water quality parameter tester and a portable acidometer.The collected water samples were returned to the laboratory on the same day of collection, and 150 mL of water samples was taken and filtered with the quantitative filter paper to measure the TN, ammonium (NH4+-N), nitrate nitrogen (NO3−-N), and nitrite (NO2−-N). These parameters were analyzed according to standard methods approved by the National Environmental Protection Agency of China [11]. TN in the digestion was measured by the alkaline potassium persulfate ultraviolet spectrophotometry. NH4+-N was determined by the Nesslerization colorimetric method. NO3−-N was measured by the phenol disulfonic acid ultraviolet spectrophotometric method. The concentration of NO2−-N was measured by the N-(1-naphthyl) -ethylenediamine spectrophotometry.The measurement of nitrogen and oxygen isotopes was conducted in the Third Oceanographic Research Institute of the Oceanic Bureau by applying MAT 253 Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (Thermo Scientific Corporation). The detection process for the machine is as follows: the PAL autosampler is first used to automate sample injection, and then the N2O in the sample is frozen and fixed by the primary cold trap in the liquid nitrogen tank. After 10 minutes, the primary cold trap leaves the liquid nitrogen tank, and the frozen and fixed N2O is released to the secondary cold trap in the liquid nitrogen tank. After another 5 minutes, the secondary cold trap leaves the liquid nitrogen tank. The N2O is separated from other impurity gases via a chromatographic column (with a column temperature of 45°C). The separated N2O is transferred into the Mat 253 detector via helium gas. Under the high-energy electron impact ionization and accelerating field, the gaseous ions with different mass-to-charge ratios (m/z44, m/z45, and m/z46) enter the magnetic field and are separated into different ion beams. The ion beams then enter the receiver and are converted to the electric signal to measure the nitrogen to oxygen isotope ratio [12]. The values of δ15N and δ18O were obtained by referring to the international standards of atmospheric nitrogen (AIR) and standard mean ocean water (SMOW), respectively. The analysis precision for the values of δ15N and δ18O was ±0.2 and ±0.3‰, respectively, which can meet the precision requirements for the study.


### 2.3. The Model of Isotope Source Analysis

In this study, the SIAR isotope source analytical model was used to calculate the contribution rate of each N source. Assuming that there are N measured values, J isotopes, and K nitrogen sources, the SIAR model can be expressed as follows:(1)Xij=∑k−1kPkSjk+Cjk+εij,Sjk∼Nμjk,ωjk2,Cjk∼Nλjk,τjk2,εjk∼N0,σj2,where Xij is the ratio of the isotope i in the mixture j (i = 1, 2, 3, …, N; j = 1, 2, 3, …, J), Pk is the contribution rate of source k (k = 1, 2, 3, …, K), Sjk is the rate of isotope j in source k (k = 1, 2, 3, …, K), μ is the average value, ω is the standard deviation, Cjk is the fractionation coefficient of the jth isotope on the kth source, λ is the average value, τ is the standard deviation, εjk is the residual error, and δ is the standard deviation.


## 2.1. Study Area

The upstream of Fenhe River Reservoir has a total length of 216 kilometers and a drainage basin area of 7750 km2. The Fenhe River Reservoir covers an area of 5268 km2, belonging to Ningwu county, Jingle county, Lan county, and Loufan county, which accounts for 78.6% of the total area of four counties. The length of mainstream for the upper course of Fenhe River Reservoir is 122 km, and 13 tributaries are included. Each area of Honghe River, Dongnian River, Lanhe River, and Jianhe River, which were defined as the first level branches, is more than 500 km2. The study area has four distinctive seasons, with an average temperature and relative humidity of 7.2°C and 60.1%. About 180–200 days in the year are frost-free. The distribution of precipitation is 465 mm, which occurred mostly from July to September. Thus, its wet season is defined between July and September, while the dry season is from November to March of the next year.


## 2.2. Sample Collection and Measurement

Water samples were collected at 13 sampling points in the Fenhe River Reservoir and the upstream section of the river. The specific layout and positions are shown in Figure1. The sampling time of the wet and dry seasons is in the periods of August 21st–25th and November 15th–19th, respectively. As the aim of this study was to explore the sources of nitrogen pollution, we set the sampling sites mainly considering the influent pollutants to Fenhe River based on the state controlling sites. According to previous site investigation, there was nitrogen pollution in the middle section, and the sampling sites were less correspondingly.Figure 1
Locations of the sampling sites in study area. S1: Leiming Temple; S2: the entrance to Yellow River water diversion junction of Toumaying village; S3: the outlet of Yellow River water diversion junction of Toumaying village; S4: the junction of Honghe River; S5: Mingshuihe River; S6: Jingle county; S7: Dongnianhe River; S8: Hecha village; S9: Quli county; S10: the inlet of Fenhe Reservoir; S11: the middle part of Fenhe Reservoir; S12: the outlet of Fenhe Reservoir; S13: Jianhe River Bridge.The collected water samples were stored separately in 500 mL polyethylene bottles that were prerinsed with distilled water and were then put into a portable incubator for temporary storage. The water temperature (T), pH, electric conductivity (ORP), and dissolved oxygen (DO) in the water body were measured using a portable water quality parameter tester and a portable acidometer.The collected water samples were returned to the laboratory on the same day of collection, and 150 mL of water samples was taken and filtered with the quantitative filter paper to measure the TN, ammonium (NH4+-N), nitrate nitrogen (NO3−-N), and nitrite (NO2−-N). These parameters were analyzed according to standard methods approved by the National Environmental Protection Agency of China [11]. TN in the digestion was measured by the alkaline potassium persulfate ultraviolet spectrophotometry. NH4+-N was determined by the Nesslerization colorimetric method. NO3−-N was measured by the phenol disulfonic acid ultraviolet spectrophotometric method. The concentration of NO2−-N was measured by the N-(1-naphthyl) -ethylenediamine spectrophotometry.The measurement of nitrogen and oxygen isotopes was conducted in the Third Oceanographic Research Institute of the Oceanic Bureau by applying MAT 253 Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (Thermo Scientific Corporation). The detection process for the machine is as follows: the PAL autosampler is first used to automate sample injection, and then the N2O in the sample is frozen and fixed by the primary cold trap in the liquid nitrogen tank. After 10 minutes, the primary cold trap leaves the liquid nitrogen tank, and the frozen and fixed N2O is released to the secondary cold trap in the liquid nitrogen tank. After another 5 minutes, the secondary cold trap leaves the liquid nitrogen tank. The N2O is separated from other impurity gases via a chromatographic column (with a column temperature of 45°C). The separated N2O is transferred into the Mat 253 detector via helium gas. Under the high-energy electron impact ionization and accelerating field, the gaseous ions with different mass-to-charge ratios (m/z44, m/z45, and m/z46) enter the magnetic field and are separated into different ion beams. The ion beams then enter the receiver and are converted to the electric signal to measure the nitrogen to oxygen isotope ratio [12]. The values of δ15N and δ18O were obtained by referring to the international standards of atmospheric nitrogen (AIR) and standard mean ocean water (SMOW), respectively. The analysis precision for the values of δ15N and δ18O was ±0.2 and ±0.3‰, respectively, which can meet the precision requirements for the study.


## 2.3. The Model of Isotope Source Analysis

In this study, the SIAR isotope source analytical model was used to calculate the contribution rate of each N source. Assuming that there are N measured values, J isotopes, and K nitrogen sources, the SIAR model can be expressed as follows:(1)Xij=∑k−1kPkSjk+Cjk+εij,Sjk∼Nμjk,ωjk2,Cjk∼Nλjk,τjk2,εjk∼N0,σj2,where Xij is the ratio of the isotope i in the mixture j (i = 1, 2, 3, …, N; j = 1, 2, 3, …, J), Pk is the contribution rate of source k (k = 1, 2, 3, …, K), Sjk is the rate of isotope j in source k (k = 1, 2, 3, …, K), μ is the average value, ω is the standard deviation, Cjk is the fractionation coefficient of the jth isotope on the kth source, λ is the average value, τ is the standard deviation, εjk is the residual error, and δ is the standard deviation.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Nitrogen Pollution in the Upstream Section of the Fenhe River Reservoir

As shown in Table1, in the wet period, water temperature ranged from 11°C to 25.2°C, pH was 7.83–8.85, DO concentrations were between 4.9 mg/L and 12.5 mg/L, and ORP values were 201–263 mv. However, in the dry period, pH and DO values were almost the same as that in the wet period. However, the values of temperature and ORP were lower than that in flood season.Table 1
Chemical indices in the water samples collected from the upstream of Fenhe River.
Sampling sites
Wet period
Dry period
T (°C)
pH
DO (mg/L)
ORP (mv)
T (°C)
pH
DO (mg/L)
ORP (mv)
S1
12.0 ± 0.6
8.23 ± 0.40
5.8 ± 0.3
257 ± 12
10.1 ± 0.5
8.52 ± 0.44
8.8 ± 0.4
164 ± 9
S2
13.0 ± 0.7
8.12 ± 0.41
11.2 ± 0.6
241 ± 13
15.5 ± 0.9
8.4 ± 0.40
16.5 ± 0.9
178 ± 9
S3
11.0 ± 0.5
8.51 ± 0.39
8.3 ± 0.4
253 ± 12
12.0 ± 0.6
8.73 ± 0.43
15.3 ± 0.8
187 ± 10
S4
14.0 ± 0.7
8.42 ± 0.44
5.5 ± 0.3
263 ± 13
18.1 ± 0.9
8.86 ± 0.46
12.3 ± 0.6
155 ± 8
S5
19.0 ± 1.03
8.25 ± 0.38
8.3 ± 0.4
254 ± 13
19.7 ± 0.9
7.83 ± 0.37
10.8 ± 0.6
155 ± 8
S6
19.0 ± 0.90
8.36 ± 0.41
12.5 ± 0.7
249 ± 11
18.5 ± 0.9
8.47 ± 0.42
6.84 ± 0.4
175 ± 10
S7
17.1 ± 0.86
8.35 ± 0.41
6.8 ± 0.4
201 ± 9
16.9 ± 0.9
8.48 ± 0.39
8.69 ± 0.4
170 ± 8
S8
14.0 ± 0.71
8.35 ± 0.47
5.5 ± 0.3
249 ± 12
18.1 ± 1.0
8.63 ± 0.48
6.38 ± 0.3
189 ± 10
S9
18.0 ± 0.83
7.83 ± 0.41
4.9 ± 0.2
252 ± 14
21.3 ± 1.0
8.07 ± 0.41
5.02 ± 0.3
161 ± 8
S10
25.2 ± 1.30
8.54 ± 0.44
9.7 ± 0.5
222 ± 12
23.5 ± 1.3
8.2 ± 0.39
10.8 ± 0.5
205 ± 10
S11
23.3 ± 1.14
8.51 ± 0.40
9.5 ± 0.5
234 ± 12
23.2 ± 1.1
8.63 ± 0.43
10.6 ± 0.6
248 ± 13
S12
23.6 ± 1.10
8.58 ± 0.43
8.6 ± 0.5
234 ± 11
22.9 ± 1.2
8.95 ± 0.46
12.5 ± 0.6
249 ± 12
S13
21.3 ± 1.12
8.85 ± 0.47
7.3 ± 0.4
246 ± 11
19.8 ± 0.9
8.85 ± 0.47
5.17 ± 0.2
184 ± 10The distribution of different forms of inorganic nitrogen during four seasons in the Fenhe River is shown in Figure2. It can be seen that the concentrations of TN, NH4+-N, NO3−-N, and NO2−-N during the wet season were 0.88–3.52, 0.035–0.187, 0.16–1.06, and 0.008–0.174 mg·L−1, respectively. During the dry seasons, the concentrations of TN, NH4+-N, NO3−-N, and NO2−-N were 0.87–10.6, 0.079–0.129, 0.28–3.01, and 0.006–0.838 mg·L−1, respectively. Figure 2 shows that 84.6% of the sampling points in the upstream of the Fenhe River Reservoir exceeded the guided values of Class III (TN for 1.0 mg·L−1) referred by Chinese Surface Water Environmental Quality Standard (GB 3838-2002) [13].Figure 2
Distribution characteristics of different forms of inorganic nitrogen in study area.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The peaks of inorganic nitrogen concentration occurred frequently at the three sampling points of S6, S8, and S9. The concentrations of theNH4+-N and NO2−-N in S6 were relatively high, and the concentrations of the TN and NO3−-N in S8 reached the highest level in the wet season. As these two sampling points are located in the mainstream of the Fenhe River, the pollution was mainly from the domestic pollution caused by the untreated sewage in 13 towns along the mainstream of the Fenhe River. The concentrations of the TN and NO3−-N at S9 were both relatively high during the wet and dry seasons. This sampling point, which was mainly affected by the tributary of the Lan River, may suffer from the incomplete treatment of the surrounding sewage treatment plants and the discharge of domestic sewage. At the sampling point S13, NH4+-N and NO3−-N were relatively high during the wet season. It was found that the surrounding population density was relatively dense, and a large amount of domestic sewage and livestock manure were directly discharged into the river without any treatment. Our previous studies also showed that the highest TN concentrations in three monitoring points of the Fenhe River Reservoir exceeded the standard values for Class III of Chinese water quality grade scale (1.0 mg·L−1) by 3.61 times [13]. In 2015, the concentrations of TN during the flood season and dry season were 1.40–1.42 mg/L and 2.48–2.98 mg/L, respectively, with the TN exceeding the standard value by 1.8–4.9 times. More than 90% of the monitoring points in the upstream section of the Fenhe River Reservoir have been comprehensively polluted.


### 3.2. Characteristics of Nitrate Isotopes in the Upstream Section of the Fenhe River Reservoir

When using nitrate nitrogen and oxygen isotopes to identify nitrate sources in rivers, it is assuming that the nitrate nitrogen is stable in the water body. However, denitrification may change the composition of nitrate source isotopes that further affect the traceability. Therefore, understanding the existence of denitrification is a prerequisite for exploring the source of nitrate [5]. Studies have shown that if the ratio of δ15N to δ18O is 1.3 : 1–2.1 : 1, denitrification can take place [14]. In addition, when the DO concentrations in the water body exceeds 3.1 mg·L−1, it is not conducive to have denitrification [15]. In this study, the DO content in each sampling point was greater than 3.1 mg·L−1 during the entire sampling period, and the DO content was sufficient (Table 1). Additionally, the linear proportional relationship in the range of 1.3 : 1–2.1 : 1 was absent for the ratio of δ15N to δ18O. Thus, it can be determined that almost no denitrification occurred in the Fenhe River.The results of nitrate nitrogen and oxygen isotope showed thatδ15N during the wet season was 0.117–4.894‰, while δ18O during the wet season was from −3.268 to 24.531‰ (Figure 3). During the dry season, δ15N was within 0.527–4.691‰, while δ18O was in the range of −0.485–21.527‰. The mean nitrate δ15N during the wet and dry seasons was 2.283 and 2.710‰, respectively. The values of δ15N in S9 and S5 were the lowest, whereas the values of δ15N in S10 and S11 were the highest probably because the reservoir is located near Lan County that has a dense population. Therefore, S10 and S11 were more affected by domestic discharged sewage. The mean nitrate δ18O during the wet and dry seasons was 5.862 and 5.891‰, respectively, and the samples with the highest values were all collected from the Jianhe River Bridge at the sampling point S13, indicating that the pollution caused by inorganic fertilizer was relatively severe at S13.Figure 3
Distribution characteristics of nitrogen and oxygen isotope in the study area.
(a)
(b)For the pollution sources ofNO3−, the fertilizer source indicated the inorganic nitrogen in the fertilizer spread to river by precipitation or infiltration. Previous studies reported that δ15N values in fertilizers vary between −6‰ and 6‰, while δ18O values range from 17 to 25 [16]. NO3−-N derived from soil organic N is a product of bacterial decomposition of organic materials originated from degradation of plants and animal wastes [17]. The δ15N values in soils (mostly organic N) frequently range from −3‰ to 8‰, and the δ18O values range from 17 to 25 [18]. Atmospheric N is reported to be enriched in δ18O-NO3− by exchanging O atoms with ozone. Literature reported that the δ15N values in the atmospheric deposition range from −13‰ to 13‰, and the δ18O values range from 29‰ to 58.2‰ [19, 20]. The δ15N values of NO3−-N derived from manure and waste water generally range from 4‰ to 25‰, and the corresponding δ18O values vary between −5‰ and 10‰ [21, 22].As shown in Figure4, the concentrations of δ15N and δ18O values at the sampling points of this study mainly distributed in the range of typical values of inorganic fertilizer, soil organic nitrogen, and domestic sewage area or nearby. Combining the site-investigation results of pollution sources, it can be confirmed that the nitrate nitrogen pollution in the upstream section of the Fenhe River Reservoir mainly came from the inorganic fertilizer, soil organic nitrogen, and domestic sewage.Figure 4
Distribution of typical and measured values ofδ15N and δ18O for different sources of the nitrate.


### 3.3. Calculating the Contribution Rate for Each Source ofNO3− by SIAR Model in the Upstream of the Fenhe River Reservoir

In this study, the isotope source analytical model SIAR based on Bayesian analysis was used to analyze the contribution rates of the three nitrate nitrogen sources to the upstream of the Fenhe River Reservoir. The mean isotope characteristics and variance of the three sources of pollution were derived from local sampling data. The former analysis indicated that the microbial denitrification in study area was weak. Therefore, the fractionation coefficientCjk in equation (1) was assumed to be zero.According to the output of the SIAR model, the contribution rates of the three sources ofNO3− in the upstream section of the Fenhe River Reservoir during the wet season were in the following order, i.e., soil organic nitrogen (36.83%)> domestic sewage (32.96%)> inorganic fertilizer (30.21%). For the following dry season, however, the following order was observed as domestic sewage (40.68%)> soil organic nitrogen (31.40%)> inorganic fertilizer (27.91%) (Figure 5). The results showed that the soil nitrogen contributed a higher rate to nitrate during the wet season. It was because that the land-use types in the upstream section of the Fenhe River Reservoir in 2019 mainly consisted of farmlands, forests, and grasslands, accounting for 33.2, 30.2, and 33.1% of the total land area, respectively. Water-soluble organic nitrogen in the forest soil often plays an important role in the soil nitrogen pool. For many forests, the water-soluble organic nitrogen levels in soil are more than 100 times than the levels of NH4+-N and NO3−-N [23, 24]. In this study, the rainfall was so high during the wet season that the water-soluble organic nitrogen entered the reservoir with water and soil loss. Then, they were converted to nitrate by nitrification. The contribution of domestic sewage to nitrate nitrogen was as high to 41% during the dry season due to the increased human activities on harvest during this period. However, the contribution of inorganic fertilizers was small (28–31%) in two periods. It can be seen that the project of “Five Water Treatment” in Shanxi Province has achieved initial success, and the nonpoint source pollution caused by planting is controlled. However, the control of rural and urban sewage discharge still needs to be further improved.Figure 5
Box plots of mean probability estimates of the source contributions in the upstream of Fenhe Reservoir: (a) wet period; (b) dry period. Note: the legends of green, blue, and red referred to 50%, 75%, and 95% credibility interval, respectively.
(a)
(b)The above results were different from that reported in a subtropical watershed located in Changxing County, Zhejiang Province, by Yang et al. [7]. Their studies showed that the contribution rate of sources of manure sewage and atmospheric deposition in December was higher than that in May, while the contribution rate of sources of chemical fertilizer and soil in May was higher than that in December. In December, the contribution rate of manure sewage is the highest, reaching 61%. In May, the contribution rate of fertilizer is the highest at 37%. The reasons may be related with two effects. The wet season was defined as in May, and the fertilizer is also applied in this month shortly before rice is transplanted into the field. While in Fenhe River, the wet season was in August so that the effect of fertilizer on nitrogen pollution was slight. In the watershed of Changxing County, as the N isotope signature of sewage is similar to N isotope signature of manure (mainly animal waste), these two sources were treated as one source. However, in Fenhe River, the sewage source of nitrogen pollution only indicated domestic sewage, and the manure source was not included.To further explain the contribution of the SIAR model to each pollution source, this study provided a post hoc testing distribution diagram (Figure6). It showed that the median, mean, and maximum posterior probabilities for different nitrate nitrogen sources were generally identical, and the post hoc probabilities were symmetrically distributed. For the posterior samples of the three nitrate nitrogen sources, their sums of the post hoc mean, median, and maximum estimated probabilities were all equal to 1.Figure 6
Posterior distribution of proportional contributions of three potentialNO3− sources in the upstream of Fenhe Reservoir: (a) wet period; (b) dry period.
(a)
(b)


## 3.1. Nitrogen Pollution in the Upstream Section of the Fenhe River Reservoir

As shown in Table1, in the wet period, water temperature ranged from 11°C to 25.2°C, pH was 7.83–8.85, DO concentrations were between 4.9 mg/L and 12.5 mg/L, and ORP values were 201–263 mv. However, in the dry period, pH and DO values were almost the same as that in the wet period. However, the values of temperature and ORP were lower than that in flood season.Table 1
Chemical indices in the water samples collected from the upstream of Fenhe River.
Sampling sites
Wet period
Dry period
T (°C)
pH
DO (mg/L)
ORP (mv)
T (°C)
pH
DO (mg/L)
ORP (mv)
S1
12.0 ± 0.6
8.23 ± 0.40
5.8 ± 0.3
257 ± 12
10.1 ± 0.5
8.52 ± 0.44
8.8 ± 0.4
164 ± 9
S2
13.0 ± 0.7
8.12 ± 0.41
11.2 ± 0.6
241 ± 13
15.5 ± 0.9
8.4 ± 0.40
16.5 ± 0.9
178 ± 9
S3
11.0 ± 0.5
8.51 ± 0.39
8.3 ± 0.4
253 ± 12
12.0 ± 0.6
8.73 ± 0.43
15.3 ± 0.8
187 ± 10
S4
14.0 ± 0.7
8.42 ± 0.44
5.5 ± 0.3
263 ± 13
18.1 ± 0.9
8.86 ± 0.46
12.3 ± 0.6
155 ± 8
S5
19.0 ± 1.03
8.25 ± 0.38
8.3 ± 0.4
254 ± 13
19.7 ± 0.9
7.83 ± 0.37
10.8 ± 0.6
155 ± 8
S6
19.0 ± 0.90
8.36 ± 0.41
12.5 ± 0.7
249 ± 11
18.5 ± 0.9
8.47 ± 0.42
6.84 ± 0.4
175 ± 10
S7
17.1 ± 0.86
8.35 ± 0.41
6.8 ± 0.4
201 ± 9
16.9 ± 0.9
8.48 ± 0.39
8.69 ± 0.4
170 ± 8
S8
14.0 ± 0.71
8.35 ± 0.47
5.5 ± 0.3
249 ± 12
18.1 ± 1.0
8.63 ± 0.48
6.38 ± 0.3
189 ± 10
S9
18.0 ± 0.83
7.83 ± 0.41
4.9 ± 0.2
252 ± 14
21.3 ± 1.0
8.07 ± 0.41
5.02 ± 0.3
161 ± 8
S10
25.2 ± 1.30
8.54 ± 0.44
9.7 ± 0.5
222 ± 12
23.5 ± 1.3
8.2 ± 0.39
10.8 ± 0.5
205 ± 10
S11
23.3 ± 1.14
8.51 ± 0.40
9.5 ± 0.5
234 ± 12
23.2 ± 1.1
8.63 ± 0.43
10.6 ± 0.6
248 ± 13
S12
23.6 ± 1.10
8.58 ± 0.43
8.6 ± 0.5
234 ± 11
22.9 ± 1.2
8.95 ± 0.46
12.5 ± 0.6
249 ± 12
S13
21.3 ± 1.12
8.85 ± 0.47
7.3 ± 0.4
246 ± 11
19.8 ± 0.9
8.85 ± 0.47
5.17 ± 0.2
184 ± 10The distribution of different forms of inorganic nitrogen during four seasons in the Fenhe River is shown in Figure2. It can be seen that the concentrations of TN, NH4+-N, NO3−-N, and NO2−-N during the wet season were 0.88–3.52, 0.035–0.187, 0.16–1.06, and 0.008–0.174 mg·L−1, respectively. During the dry seasons, the concentrations of TN, NH4+-N, NO3−-N, and NO2−-N were 0.87–10.6, 0.079–0.129, 0.28–3.01, and 0.006–0.838 mg·L−1, respectively. Figure 2 shows that 84.6% of the sampling points in the upstream of the Fenhe River Reservoir exceeded the guided values of Class III (TN for 1.0 mg·L−1) referred by Chinese Surface Water Environmental Quality Standard (GB 3838-2002) [13].Figure 2
Distribution characteristics of different forms of inorganic nitrogen in study area.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The peaks of inorganic nitrogen concentration occurred frequently at the three sampling points of S6, S8, and S9. The concentrations of theNH4+-N and NO2−-N in S6 were relatively high, and the concentrations of the TN and NO3−-N in S8 reached the highest level in the wet season. As these two sampling points are located in the mainstream of the Fenhe River, the pollution was mainly from the domestic pollution caused by the untreated sewage in 13 towns along the mainstream of the Fenhe River. The concentrations of the TN and NO3−-N at S9 were both relatively high during the wet and dry seasons. This sampling point, which was mainly affected by the tributary of the Lan River, may suffer from the incomplete treatment of the surrounding sewage treatment plants and the discharge of domestic sewage. At the sampling point S13, NH4+-N and NO3−-N were relatively high during the wet season. It was found that the surrounding population density was relatively dense, and a large amount of domestic sewage and livestock manure were directly discharged into the river without any treatment. Our previous studies also showed that the highest TN concentrations in three monitoring points of the Fenhe River Reservoir exceeded the standard values for Class III of Chinese water quality grade scale (1.0 mg·L−1) by 3.61 times [13]. In 2015, the concentrations of TN during the flood season and dry season were 1.40–1.42 mg/L and 2.48–2.98 mg/L, respectively, with the TN exceeding the standard value by 1.8–4.9 times. More than 90% of the monitoring points in the upstream section of the Fenhe River Reservoir have been comprehensively polluted.


## 3.2. Characteristics of Nitrate Isotopes in the Upstream Section of the Fenhe River Reservoir

When using nitrate nitrogen and oxygen isotopes to identify nitrate sources in rivers, it is assuming that the nitrate nitrogen is stable in the water body. However, denitrification may change the composition of nitrate source isotopes that further affect the traceability. Therefore, understanding the existence of denitrification is a prerequisite for exploring the source of nitrate [5]. Studies have shown that if the ratio of δ15N to δ18O is 1.3 : 1–2.1 : 1, denitrification can take place [14]. In addition, when the DO concentrations in the water body exceeds 3.1 mg·L−1, it is not conducive to have denitrification [15]. In this study, the DO content in each sampling point was greater than 3.1 mg·L−1 during the entire sampling period, and the DO content was sufficient (Table 1). Additionally, the linear proportional relationship in the range of 1.3 : 1–2.1 : 1 was absent for the ratio of δ15N to δ18O. Thus, it can be determined that almost no denitrification occurred in the Fenhe River.The results of nitrate nitrogen and oxygen isotope showed thatδ15N during the wet season was 0.117–4.894‰, while δ18O during the wet season was from −3.268 to 24.531‰ (Figure 3). During the dry season, δ15N was within 0.527–4.691‰, while δ18O was in the range of −0.485–21.527‰. The mean nitrate δ15N during the wet and dry seasons was 2.283 and 2.710‰, respectively. The values of δ15N in S9 and S5 were the lowest, whereas the values of δ15N in S10 and S11 were the highest probably because the reservoir is located near Lan County that has a dense population. Therefore, S10 and S11 were more affected by domestic discharged sewage. The mean nitrate δ18O during the wet and dry seasons was 5.862 and 5.891‰, respectively, and the samples with the highest values were all collected from the Jianhe River Bridge at the sampling point S13, indicating that the pollution caused by inorganic fertilizer was relatively severe at S13.Figure 3
Distribution characteristics of nitrogen and oxygen isotope in the study area.
(a)
(b)For the pollution sources ofNO3−, the fertilizer source indicated the inorganic nitrogen in the fertilizer spread to river by precipitation or infiltration. Previous studies reported that δ15N values in fertilizers vary between −6‰ and 6‰, while δ18O values range from 17 to 25 [16]. NO3−-N derived from soil organic N is a product of bacterial decomposition of organic materials originated from degradation of plants and animal wastes [17]. The δ15N values in soils (mostly organic N) frequently range from −3‰ to 8‰, and the δ18O values range from 17 to 25 [18]. Atmospheric N is reported to be enriched in δ18O-NO3− by exchanging O atoms with ozone. Literature reported that the δ15N values in the atmospheric deposition range from −13‰ to 13‰, and the δ18O values range from 29‰ to 58.2‰ [19, 20]. The δ15N values of NO3−-N derived from manure and waste water generally range from 4‰ to 25‰, and the corresponding δ18O values vary between −5‰ and 10‰ [21, 22].As shown in Figure4, the concentrations of δ15N and δ18O values at the sampling points of this study mainly distributed in the range of typical values of inorganic fertilizer, soil organic nitrogen, and domestic sewage area or nearby. Combining the site-investigation results of pollution sources, it can be confirmed that the nitrate nitrogen pollution in the upstream section of the Fenhe River Reservoir mainly came from the inorganic fertilizer, soil organic nitrogen, and domestic sewage.Figure 4
Distribution of typical and measured values ofδ15N and δ18O for different sources of the nitrate.


## 3.3. Calculating the Contribution Rate for Each Source ofNO3− by SIAR Model in the Upstream of the Fenhe River Reservoir

In this study, the isotope source analytical model SIAR based on Bayesian analysis was used to analyze the contribution rates of the three nitrate nitrogen sources to the upstream of the Fenhe River Reservoir. The mean isotope characteristics and variance of the three sources of pollution were derived from local sampling data. The former analysis indicated that the microbial denitrification in study area was weak. Therefore, the fractionation coefficientCjk in equation (1) was assumed to be zero.According to the output of the SIAR model, the contribution rates of the three sources ofNO3− in the upstream section of the Fenhe River Reservoir during the wet season were in the following order, i.e., soil organic nitrogen (36.83%)> domestic sewage (32.96%)> inorganic fertilizer (30.21%). For the following dry season, however, the following order was observed as domestic sewage (40.68%)> soil organic nitrogen (31.40%)> inorganic fertilizer (27.91%) (Figure 5). The results showed that the soil nitrogen contributed a higher rate to nitrate during the wet season. It was because that the land-use types in the upstream section of the Fenhe River Reservoir in 2019 mainly consisted of farmlands, forests, and grasslands, accounting for 33.2, 30.2, and 33.1% of the total land area, respectively. Water-soluble organic nitrogen in the forest soil often plays an important role in the soil nitrogen pool. For many forests, the water-soluble organic nitrogen levels in soil are more than 100 times than the levels of NH4+-N and NO3−-N [23, 24]. In this study, the rainfall was so high during the wet season that the water-soluble organic nitrogen entered the reservoir with water and soil loss. Then, they were converted to nitrate by nitrification. The contribution of domestic sewage to nitrate nitrogen was as high to 41% during the dry season due to the increased human activities on harvest during this period. However, the contribution of inorganic fertilizers was small (28–31%) in two periods. It can be seen that the project of “Five Water Treatment” in Shanxi Province has achieved initial success, and the nonpoint source pollution caused by planting is controlled. However, the control of rural and urban sewage discharge still needs to be further improved.Figure 5
Box plots of mean probability estimates of the source contributions in the upstream of Fenhe Reservoir: (a) wet period; (b) dry period. Note: the legends of green, blue, and red referred to 50%, 75%, and 95% credibility interval, respectively.
(a)
(b)The above results were different from that reported in a subtropical watershed located in Changxing County, Zhejiang Province, by Yang et al. [7]. Their studies showed that the contribution rate of sources of manure sewage and atmospheric deposition in December was higher than that in May, while the contribution rate of sources of chemical fertilizer and soil in May was higher than that in December. In December, the contribution rate of manure sewage is the highest, reaching 61%. In May, the contribution rate of fertilizer is the highest at 37%. The reasons may be related with two effects. The wet season was defined as in May, and the fertilizer is also applied in this month shortly before rice is transplanted into the field. While in Fenhe River, the wet season was in August so that the effect of fertilizer on nitrogen pollution was slight. In the watershed of Changxing County, as the N isotope signature of sewage is similar to N isotope signature of manure (mainly animal waste), these two sources were treated as one source. However, in Fenhe River, the sewage source of nitrogen pollution only indicated domestic sewage, and the manure source was not included.To further explain the contribution of the SIAR model to each pollution source, this study provided a post hoc testing distribution diagram (Figure6). It showed that the median, mean, and maximum posterior probabilities for different nitrate nitrogen sources were generally identical, and the post hoc probabilities were symmetrically distributed. For the posterior samples of the three nitrate nitrogen sources, their sums of the post hoc mean, median, and maximum estimated probabilities were all equal to 1.Figure 6
Posterior distribution of proportional contributions of three potentialNO3− sources in the upstream of Fenhe Reservoir: (a) wet period; (b) dry period.
(a)
(b)


## 4. Conclusions

(1)
The section with severe nitrogen pollution in the study area was mainly affected by the input of tributaries and the discharge of surrounding domestic sewage. The water quality during the wet season was better than that in the dry season. In sum, the water quality in study area was severely contaminated.
(2)
Quantitative analysis of the nitrogen and oxygen isotope of nitrate in the water body based on the SIAR model showed that the inorganic fertilizer, soil organic nitrogen, and domestic sewage were the main sources of pollution in the upstream section of the Fenhe River Reservoir. The contribution rate of chemical fertilizers, soil organic nitrogen, and domestic sewage was 30–31%, 31–37%, and 33–41%, respectively. It was seemed that their contributions were not so far different. It may be related with the function of Fenhe River Reservoir. As the Fenhe River Reservoir is the biggest centralized drinking water source in Taiyuan, the pollution sources from industry were scare. Thus, the contributions from agricultural, domestic pollution, and soil were main pollution sources.To establish goals of reducing nitrogen pollution in Fenhe River, a proposal was made for the development of a nitrogen control program that consists of the following elements: regulation of industrial discharges of sewage to the greatest extent practicable, reduction of rural domestic discharges from diffuse sources into the upper Fenhe River, improving the system of municipal wastewater treatment, and maintenance of a viable research program to seek maximum efficiency and effectiveness in the control of nitrogen introductions into the Fenhe River.In this study, the SIAR model was used to study quantitatively the contribution rate of nitrate sources in the upstream section of the Fenhe River Reservoir. However, some limitations need to be considered. During the migration and transformation of water nitrogen, the nitrification and denitrification can cause the fractionation of nitrogen, which may, in turn, affect the contents ofδ15N and δ18O. In this study, Cjk was defined as 0 and the fractionation was neglected, which may lead to the deviations of the calculation. In future studies, the effect of the isotope fractionation should be incorporated in the SIAR model to more accurately track and quantify the nitrogen pollutants.



---

*Source: 6574210-2020-03-31.xml*