# A Small UWB Antenna with Dual Band-Notched Characteristics

Authors: J. Xu; D.-Y. Shen; G.-T. Wang; X.-H. Zhang; X.-P. Zhang; K. Wu
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

A small novel ultrawideband (UWB) antenna with dual band-notched functions is proposed. The dual band rejection is achieved by etching two C-shaped slots on the radiation patch with limited area. A single band-notched antenna is firstly presented, and then an optimized dual band-notched antenna is presented and analyzed. The measured VSWR shows that the proposed antenna could operate from 3.05 to 10.7 GHz with VSWR less than 2, except two stopbands at 3.38 to 3.82 GHz and 5.3 to 5.8 GHz for filtering the WiMAX and WLAN signals. Radiation patterns are simulated by HFSS and verified by CST, and quasiomnidirectional radiation patterns in the H-plane could be observed. Moreover, the proposed antenna has a very compact size and could be easily integrated into portable UWB devices.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Since the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) allocated the frequency band 3.1–10.6 GHz for commercial ultrawideband (UWB) systems, considerable research efforts have been put into UWB radio technology in industry and academia. Several UWB antennas with compact size have been reported in [1–3] recently. However, UWB systems have encountered a hostile radio environment which may cause potential interferences to the UWB band. For instance, IEEE 802.16 WiMAX system operates at 3.3–3.7 GHz and IEEE 802.11a WLAN system operates at 5.15–5.825 GHz. In some cases, UWB antennas use filters to avoid interferences. However, the use of filters increases the complexity and cost of the UWB system. Thus, antenna-filtering technique may be one of the simple, effective, and inexpensive methods, and antennas with small size and band rejection functions are desirable. In order to design UWB antennas with band-notched functions, several methods have been proposed, including etching C-shaped, L-shaped, T-shaped, H-shaped, U-shaped, E-shaped, and half-circle slots on the radiation patch or on the ground plane [4–14]. Besides, by employing T-shaped, L-shaped, and spiral parasitic strips, band-rejection functions could be obtained [15–20]. By etching slots and employing parasitic strips at the same time [21, 22], dual band-notched functions could be achieved.In this paper, a small novel ultrawideband antenna with dual band-notched characteristics is proposed and investigated in detail. The primitive UWB antenna has a compact size of 22 mm × 18 mm × 1.5 mm. By etching a C-shaped slot on the radiation patch, a single band-notched UWB antenna is first designed. By adding another C-shaped slot on the radiation patch, a small dual band-notched antenna has been successfully designed. It is observed from the simulated and measured VSWR that the proposed dual band-notched antenna could operate from 3.05 to 10.7 GHz with VSWR less than 2, except two stopbands at 3.38 to 3.82 GHz and 5.3 to 5.8 GHz for filtering the WiMAX and WLAN signals. In addition, the proposed antenna has a nearly omnidirectional radiation patterns at the H-plane across the operating frequency band, which makes it a good candidate for UWB devices.


## 2. Single Band-Notched UWB Antenna Design and Results

A 3.5 GHz single band-notched UWB antenna is firstly designed, and the specific geometry is shown in Figure1. The substrate of the antenna is FR4 with a thickness of hsub=1.5 mm and relative dielectric constant of 4.5. An SMA connector is connected to the 50 Ω microstrip feed line to feed the antenna. The radiation patch has a shovel-shaped structure, and the dimensions are optimized using commercial software CST and HFSS. In order to eliminate interferences from IEEE 802.16 WiMAX system operating at 3.3–3.7 GHz, a C-shaped slot is etched on the patch to generate band rejection function. The notched frequency generated by the C-shaped slot can be postulated as
(1)fnotch=c2L⋅εeff,
where L is the total length of the C-shaped slot, εeff is the effective dielectric constant, and c is the speed of light. The position, length, and width of the slot have great effects on the band rejection performance and should be tuned carefully. Note that when the C-shaped slot is etched on the radiation patch, there is no retuning work needed for the primitive antenna structure. The optimized parameters of the antenna geometry are listed in Table 1.Table 1
Optimized parameters of the single band-notched antenna.
Parameters
w
sub
l
sub
l
gnd
h
sub
l1
l2
l3
Value (mm)
18
22
3.5
1.5
4
11
5
Parameters
l4
la1
la2
la3
ta
w
Top
w
f
Value (mm)
2
3.2
8
7
0.5
4
2Geometry of single band-notched antenna. (a) Top view, (b) bottom view.
(a)
(b)The simulated VSWR of the single band-notched antenna is shown in Figure2. It could be observed that this antenna could operate from 2.95 to 10.68 GHz with VSWR less than 2, except one stopband from 3.35 to 3.85 GHz. Let la=2×la1+2×la2+la3; the simulated VSWR for different la is given in Figure 2(b). By decreasing la from 29.4 to 25.4 mm, the notched frequency is shifted up from 3.6 to 4.2 GHz.Simulated VSWR of single band-notched antenna with (a) optimizedla, (b) different la.
(a)
(b)


## 3. Dual Band-Notched UWB Antenna

### 3.1. Antenna Design and Configuration

Besides WiMAX systems, WLAN operating from 5.15 to 5.825 GHz may cause interferences to the UWB system too. By etching another smaller C-shaped slot on the radiation patch, 5.5 GHz band-notched function is realized. The notched frequency generated by the C-shaped slot can be postulated by (1). The specific geometry of the dual band-notched antenna is shown in Figure 3. All the dimensions are the same as that in Figure 1, except the adding of another smaller C-shaped slot. The geometry of the smaller slot is given in Table 2. An alternative method to generate dual band-notched function is using two nested C-shaped slots [4], but the tuning process may be complicated due to mutual coupling of the slots. Thus, two independent C-shaped slots are used to generate dual band-notched functions and the tuning process could be simplified.Table 2
Optimized geometry of the smaller C-shaped slot.
Parameters
lb1
lb2
lb3
tb
Value (mm)
4
2
8.6
0.5Geometry of dual band-notched antenna. (a) Top view, (b) bottom view.
(a)
(b)


### 3.2. Simulated and Measured Results and Discussions

In order to verify the design concept, a prototype of the dual band-notched antenna is fabricated and measured. The photograph of the fabricated dual band-notched antenna is given in Figure4. The VSWR of the dual band-notched antenna is measured by Agilent E8364B Vector Network Analyzer and is given in Figure 5. Relatively good agreement between the simulated and measured VSWR could be observed. The discrepancy is mainly due to the fabrication tolerance and hand welding inaccuracy. It could be observed that the designed antenna has a wideband performance of 3.05–10.7 GHz for VSWR less than 2, covering the entire UWB frequency band, with two stopbands at 3.38–3.82 GHz and 5.3–5.8 GHz for filtering the WiMAX and WLAN signals.Figure 4
Photograph of the proposed dual band-notched antenna.Figure 5
Simulated and measured VSWR of the proposed dual band-notched antenna.Letlb=2×lb1+2×lb2+lb3; effects of parameter lb on the 5.5 GHz band-notched function is simulated and is shown in Figure 6. Note that the tuning of parameter lb has little affection on the VSWR of the dual band-notched antenna throughout the whole UWB frequency range, except the 5.5 GHz stopband. Thus, the 5.5 GHz band-notched characteristic could be tuned independently and no retuning work is needed for the antenna structure. It is observed that by decreasing lb from 22.6 to 19.2 mm, the notched frequency is shifted up from 5.1 to 6.0 GHz.Figure 6
Effects of parameterlb on the 5.5 GHz band-notch function.The simulated surface current distributions at 3.5 GHz and 5.5 GHz are given in Figure7. The large current distribution is indicated in red, and small one is in blue. It is observed that the surface current is highly concentrated at each C-shaped slot, which means that a large portion of electromagnetic energy has been stored around the slots and the radiation efficiency decreases at the rejected band.Simulated current distribution of the proposed antenna. (a) 3.5 GHz, (b) 5.5 GHz.
(a)
(b)The simulated radiation patterns at xoz-plane (H-plane) and yoz-plane (E-plane) of the proposed antenna at 4 GHz, 7 GHz, and 10 GHz are illustrated in Figures8, 9, and 10, respectively. It is observed that the radiation patterns at xoz-plane are nearly omnidirectional, which makes it a good candidate for UWB devices.Radiation patterns of the proposed antenna at 4 GHz; (a) xoz-plane, (b) yoz-plane.
(a)
(b)Radiation patterns of the proposed antenna at 7 GHz; (a) xoz-plane, (b) yoz-plane.
(a)
(b)Radiation patterns of the proposed antenna at 10 GHz; (a) xoz-plane, (b) yoz-plane.
(a)
(b)Furthermore, Figure11 shows the peak gain of the proposed dual band-notched antenna. The simulated peak gain ranges from 2 to 5.5 dBi throughout the whole UWB frequency band, except two stopbands. As discussed above, the energy at the notched frequency bands is not radiated so that the radiation efficiency drops at the notched frequency bands. Thus, the peak gain decreases sharply at 3.5 GHz and 5.5 GHz, which clearly indicates the dual band rejection functions of the proposed antenna.Figure 11
Peak gain of the proposed antenna.


## 3.1. Antenna Design and Configuration

Besides WiMAX systems, WLAN operating from 5.15 to 5.825 GHz may cause interferences to the UWB system too. By etching another smaller C-shaped slot on the radiation patch, 5.5 GHz band-notched function is realized. The notched frequency generated by the C-shaped slot can be postulated by (1). The specific geometry of the dual band-notched antenna is shown in Figure 3. All the dimensions are the same as that in Figure 1, except the adding of another smaller C-shaped slot. The geometry of the smaller slot is given in Table 2. An alternative method to generate dual band-notched function is using two nested C-shaped slots [4], but the tuning process may be complicated due to mutual coupling of the slots. Thus, two independent C-shaped slots are used to generate dual band-notched functions and the tuning process could be simplified.Table 2
Optimized geometry of the smaller C-shaped slot.
Parameters
lb1
lb2
lb3
tb
Value (mm)
4
2
8.6
0.5Geometry of dual band-notched antenna. (a) Top view, (b) bottom view.
(a)
(b)


## 3.2. Simulated and Measured Results and Discussions

In order to verify the design concept, a prototype of the dual band-notched antenna is fabricated and measured. The photograph of the fabricated dual band-notched antenna is given in Figure4. The VSWR of the dual band-notched antenna is measured by Agilent E8364B Vector Network Analyzer and is given in Figure 5. Relatively good agreement between the simulated and measured VSWR could be observed. The discrepancy is mainly due to the fabrication tolerance and hand welding inaccuracy. It could be observed that the designed antenna has a wideband performance of 3.05–10.7 GHz for VSWR less than 2, covering the entire UWB frequency band, with two stopbands at 3.38–3.82 GHz and 5.3–5.8 GHz for filtering the WiMAX and WLAN signals.Figure 4
Photograph of the proposed dual band-notched antenna.Figure 5
Simulated and measured VSWR of the proposed dual band-notched antenna.Letlb=2×lb1+2×lb2+lb3; effects of parameter lb on the 5.5 GHz band-notched function is simulated and is shown in Figure 6. Note that the tuning of parameter lb has little affection on the VSWR of the dual band-notched antenna throughout the whole UWB frequency range, except the 5.5 GHz stopband. Thus, the 5.5 GHz band-notched characteristic could be tuned independently and no retuning work is needed for the antenna structure. It is observed that by decreasing lb from 22.6 to 19.2 mm, the notched frequency is shifted up from 5.1 to 6.0 GHz.Figure 6
Effects of parameterlb on the 5.5 GHz band-notch function.The simulated surface current distributions at 3.5 GHz and 5.5 GHz are given in Figure7. The large current distribution is indicated in red, and small one is in blue. It is observed that the surface current is highly concentrated at each C-shaped slot, which means that a large portion of electromagnetic energy has been stored around the slots and the radiation efficiency decreases at the rejected band.Simulated current distribution of the proposed antenna. (a) 3.5 GHz, (b) 5.5 GHz.
(a)
(b)The simulated radiation patterns at xoz-plane (H-plane) and yoz-plane (E-plane) of the proposed antenna at 4 GHz, 7 GHz, and 10 GHz are illustrated in Figures8, 9, and 10, respectively. It is observed that the radiation patterns at xoz-plane are nearly omnidirectional, which makes it a good candidate for UWB devices.Radiation patterns of the proposed antenna at 4 GHz; (a) xoz-plane, (b) yoz-plane.
(a)
(b)Radiation patterns of the proposed antenna at 7 GHz; (a) xoz-plane, (b) yoz-plane.
(a)
(b)Radiation patterns of the proposed antenna at 10 GHz; (a) xoz-plane, (b) yoz-plane.
(a)
(b)Furthermore, Figure11 shows the peak gain of the proposed dual band-notched antenna. The simulated peak gain ranges from 2 to 5.5 dBi throughout the whole UWB frequency band, except two stopbands. As discussed above, the energy at the notched frequency bands is not radiated so that the radiation efficiency drops at the notched frequency bands. Thus, the peak gain decreases sharply at 3.5 GHz and 5.5 GHz, which clearly indicates the dual band rejection functions of the proposed antenna.Figure 11
Peak gain of the proposed antenna.


## 4. Conclusions

In this paper, a small novel UWB antenna with dual band-notched characteristics has been proposed and analyzed. The primitive UWB antenna is fabricated on FR4 substrate and has a shovel-shaped radiation patch, which results in a compact size of 22 mm × 18 mm × 1.5 mm. Two C-shaped slots are etched on the small patch to achieve 3.5 GHz and 5.5 GHz dual band-notched functions. Nearly omnidirectional radiation patterns could be observed at the H-plane throughout the whole operating frequency band. Accordingly, the proposed dual band-notched UWB antenna might be useful for compact portable UWB devices to eliminate abundant electromagnetic interferences.



---

*Source: 656858-2012-08-29.xml*