# Synthesis, Optimization, Property, Characterization, and Application of Dialdehyde Cross-Linking Guar Gum

Authors: Tang Hongbo; Li Yanping; Zhang Wen; Dong Siqing
Journal: International Journal of Polymer Science
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

Dialdehyde cross-linking guar gum (DCLGG), as a novel material, was synthesized using phosphorus oxychloride as a cross-linking reagent, sodium periodate as an oxidant, and ethanol as a solvent through keeping the original particle form of guar gum. The process parameters such as the reaction temperature, reaction time, pH, amount of sodium periodate, and amount of ethanol were optimized by the response surface methodology in order to obtain the regression model of the oxidization. The covalent binding of L-asparagine onto the surfaces of DCLGG was further investigated. The results showed that the best technological conditions for preparing DCLGG were as follows: reaction temperature = 40°C, reaction time = 3.0 h, pH = 4.0, and amount of ethanol = 74.5%. The swelling power of DCLGG was intermediate between cross-linking guar gum and dialdehyde guar gum. The cross-linking and dialdehyde oxidization reduced the viscosity of GG. The cross-liking reduced the melting enthalpy of GG. However, the oxidization increased melting enthalpy of ACLGG. The thermal stability of GG was increased by cross-linking or oxidization. The variation of the onset decomposition temperature and end decomposition temperature of GG was not consistent with thermal stability of GG. L-asparagine could be chemically bound well by DCLGG through forming Schiff base under the weak acidity. The maximum adsorption capacity of L-asparagine on DCLGG with aldehyde content of 56.2% reached 21.9 mg/g.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Guar gum (GG), which is a natural water-soluble nonionic polysaccharide isolated from the seeds ofCyamopsis tetragonolobus, is an attractive material for the controlled drug delivery. Chemically, GG belongs to the galactomannan family. It consists of (1→4)-β-D-mannopyranosyl units with α-D-galactopyranosyl units attached by the 1→6 linkages. It has ability to produce highly viscous pseudoplastic aqueous solutions even at the low concentrations due to the high molecular weight and the extended repeating unit formed by the hydrogen bonding [1]. There is a host of the chemical processes involving GG which are designed to endow the natural guar gum with a variety of the desired properties. The modification of GG brings about the structural alterations and the introduction of new functional groups. At present, GG is mainly modified by the etherification [2], esterification [3, 4], oxidation [5], cross-linking [6], enzymatic hydrolysis [7], and graft [8] in order to improve its performances.The cross-linking introduced chemically into the polymers will change their swelling power and rheology [9–11]. The cross-linking renders the cross-linked polymer insoluble in the acidic pH [12]. Generally, there are many kinds of the cross-linking agents used for the polymer modification. For example, the common cross-linking agents used for starch include epichlorhydrin, sodium trimetaphosphate, and phosphorus oxychloride [13, 14]. At present, the cross-linking agent used for GG modification is usually only borax or glutaraldehyde. Furthermore, the reactive aldehyde groups render the dialdehyde compounds of this type suitable for many applications, for example, as a biocide [15, 16], a cross-linker by the reaction with other functional groups such as the hydroxyl and amino groups [17, 18], and a corrosion inhibitor for the alloys [19].Therefore, as mentioned above, the properties of GG modified by composite diol oxidation and cross-linking are also distinctively different from those of guar gum only modified by diol oxidation or cross-linking. In this study, the dialdehyde cross-linking guar gum (DCLGG) is obtained by phosphorus oxychloride cross-linking and then sodium periodate oxidation at the controlled temperature, time, pH, and so on. The obtained DCLGG will be used for several industrial applications as a coating in paper, a wet-strength improver in biomaterials, and a strong antiviral biocide in the drug-resistant virus and bacteria, especially a wall material in the target drug carrier in order to avoid or minimize the side effects and to improve the efficacy of the therapy.When incorporating the polysaccharide in a polymer matrix, its suitable modification is required to increase its compatibility. The functional modification makes modified GG possess the advantage of forming film, compared with GG [20].Sodium periodate as a highly selective oxidizing agent cleaves the C2 and C3 linkage of the 1,4-anhydro-monosaccharide units with the formation of the dialdehyde groups [21, 22]. However, most periodate oxidation in the literature was used for starch, cellulose, and konjac glucomannan. Little work has been done to study the compound modification of GG with sodium periodate and phosphorus oxychloride.The aim of the current study is to investigate the synthesis and optimization of DCLGG, as a novel functional material and its adsorption application. The response surface methodology was used to determine the optimum conditions in order to give the maximum aldehyde content of the cross-linked guar gum. The property and characterization of DCLGG were also studied. Although the oxidation may proceed either on the granule surface or in its interior, the oxidation of cross-linked guar gum with sodium periodate is selected on the granule surface to facilitate the subsequent processing in this study. It results in the fact that functional groups on the surfaces of the GG particles are introduced, where only the hydroxyl groups are substantially cross-linked and oxidized.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

Guar gum was purchased from Binzhou ZHONGBO Chemical Co., Ltd. L-asparagine was purchased from Chengdu Herbpurify Co., Ltd. Sodium hydroxide, ammonium molybdate, and ethanol were purchased from Shenyang Xinhua Reagent Factory. Phosphorus oxychloride was purchased from Xuzhou Fine Chemical Co., Ltd. Hydrochloric acid was purchased from Shenyang Paier Fine Chemical Co., Ltd. Sodium periodate was purchased from Shenyang Chemical Reagent Factory. Potassium dihydrogen phosphate was purchased from Shenyang Chemical Reagent Factory. Ascorbic acid was purchased from Northeast Pharmaceutical General Factory. Sulfuric acid was purchased from Tianjin City Fuyu Chemical Co., Ltd. Nitric acid was purchased from Shenyang Huizhong Chemical reagent Co., Ltd. All above reagents were of analytical grade.


### 2.2. Preparation of Cross-Linked Guar Gum (CLGG)

56 g of dry GG powders (moisture content = 11.0%) weighed accurately and 144 g of ethanol solutions with a mass concentration of 90% were mixed to produce the guar gum slurry with a mass concentration of 28% by mass basis. The slurry was put into 250 mL of the three-necked flask and then stirred and heated to 30°C in the water bath. The pH value of slurry was first adjusted to 11.0 by the sodium hydroxide solutions with a mass concentration of 4%. Five minutes later, 0.6 g of phosphorus oxychloride was slowly dropped into the slurry under keeping the pH of the slurry constant by above sodium hydroxide solutions. The reaction was carried out for 1 h. After the reaction ended, the vacuum filtration of the slurry was then conducted. The obtained filtered cake was washed by ethanol aqueous solutions with a mass concentration of 60% until the pH of the washed liquid was 6.5 to 7.0. The resultant cake was dried at 60°C for about 2 h in a 1010-2 electrothermal constant-temperature dry box (Jintan City Dadi Automation Instrument Factory) so that the moisture content could be less than 12%. The dried cake was ground and screened. Finally, the CLGG was obtained [23]. The formula of guar gum reacting with phosphorus oxychloride was as follows:(1)(2)(3)POCl3+3H2O⟶H3PO4+HCl


### 2.3. Preparation of Dialdehyde Cross-Linked Guar Gum (DCLGG)

10 g of the cross-linking guar gum powders (sedimentation volume = 2.4 mL or phosphorus content = 0.024%) was weighed and then dispersed in sodium periodate aqueous ethanol solutions with a mass concentration of 10% to produce the guar gum slurry with a concentration of 10% by mass basis. The pH value of slurry was adjusted to 2.0–6.0 by 0.1 mol/L HCl and then stirred and heated to 30–50°C in the water bath. The reaction was carried out for a certain time. After the reaction ended, the vacuum filtration of the slurry was then conducted. The obtained cake was washed by the ethanol solutions with a mass concentration of 60% for about four times until there were no periodate ion and iodate ion in the modified guar gum particles. The resultant cake was dried at 60°C for about 2 h in a 1010-2 electrothermal constant-temperature dry box (Jintan City Dadi Automation Instrument Factory) so that the moisture content could be less than 12%. The dried cake was ground and screened. Finally, the DCLGG was obtained [24–26]. The formula of GG reacting with sodium periodate in acidic environment was as follows:(4)


### 2.4. Sedimentation Volume

0.2 g of the dry based sample was weighed and put into a 100 mL beaker, and then 40 mL of the distilled water was added. The slurry was heated in the water bath at 85°C for 5 min. The distilled water was then added to bring the total weight to be 40.2 g again. At the same time, the mixture was stirred thoroughly and cooled to the room temperature. 10 mL of mixture was transferred to two 10 mL graduated cylinders which were sealed with a cap and centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 10 min. The clear liquid was decanted, and the volume of the clear liquid was determined. The smaller the sedimentation volume was, the bigger the cross-linking degree would be. The sedimentation volume was expressed by the calculation as follows [27, 28]:(5)Vs=10-V,where Vs is the sedimentation volume (mL) and V is the volume of the clear liquid (mL).


### 2.5. Aldehyde Content

The aldehyde content was determined using the modified method of the quantitative alkali consumption described by previous study [29, 30]. 0.15–0.20 g of the sample of DCLGG was weighed, transferred to a 100 mL conical flask, and dispersed in 10 mL of 0.25 mol/L sodium hydroxide. The conical flask was shaken until the slight yellow solutions were obtained. The solutions were placed in the water bath and heated for two minutes at 70°C and then rapidly cooled to the room temperature. 15.0 mL of 0.125 mol/L sulphuric acid and 30 mL of the distilled water were added. Few drops of the phenolphthalein as an indicator were added and titrated with sodium hydroxide 0.25 mol/L to the permanent pink color. The aldehyde content was calculated as follows:(6)aldehydecontent%=V1×C1-2V2×C2×161m1-X×100%,where m is the mass of the sample (g), X is the moisture content of the sample (%), V2 is the volume of 0.125 mol/L H2SO4 (mL), V1 is the volume of 0.25 mol/L NaOH used to titrate the sample (mL), C1 is the concentration of NaOH (mol/L), and C2 is the concentration of H2SO4 (mol/L).


### 2.6. Nitrogen Content

The nitrogen content in the samples was determined by the improved Kjeldahl method. The accurately weighed sample (2.000±0.05 g) was placed in a digestion flask, and then 2 g of zinc powders and a few glass beads were added to the flask. After the flask was placed in the inclined position, 20 mL of concentrated H2SO4 was added. The flask was shaken until the samples were thoroughly mixed with H2SO4. The mixture was heated by a heating jacket. When the color of the mixture became green, the digestion flask was removed from a heating jacket and slowly shaken until the sample on the flask wall was washed down into the mixture. Then, the digestion flask was placed back on the heating jacket again. When the color of the mixture was clear blue green and the blue green was maintained for about half an hour, the flask was taken off the heating jacket and cooled to the room temperature. The inner wall of the flask was rinsed with 300 mL of the distilled water. Afterwards, the flask was connected to a condenser, into which the condensed water was introduced. The distillate was collected by a 300 mL conical flask containing 30 mL of 2% boric acid solutions (w/w) and 3–5 drops of methyl red indicator. The tip of the condenser was immersed in the boric acid solutions. A few zinc granules and 80 mL of 35% sodium hydroxide solutions (w/w) were added to the flask under the sealed condition through the funnel. At this time, the liquid in the flak was blue or brown. The hose of adding alkali was tightened in order to completely seal the liquid. The distillation was conducted by the heating jacket. When liquid in the conical flask was 200 mL, the distillation stopped. The condenser’s top and end were rinsed two times with little distilled water. The washing liquid was then collected in the conical flask. The distillate in the conical flask was titrated with 0.02 mol/L HCl standard solutions. The blank determination on reagents was corrected. The nitrogen content was calculated as follows [31]: (7)nitrogen  content%=V1-V0C×0.014m1-X×100,where C is the concentration of HCl standard solutions (mol/L), V0 is the volume of 0.02 mol/L HCl standard solutions to titrate the blank (mol/L), V1 is the volume of 0.02 mol/L HCl standard solutions to titrate the samples (mol/L), m is the mass of the samples (g), and X is the moisture content of the samples (%).


### 2.7. Determination of Phosphorus Content

0.4395 g of potassium dihydrogen phosphate weighed exactly was dissolved in 500 mL of purified water in a 1 L volumetric flask and diluted to volume with distilled water and mixed thoroughly. 10.0 mL of the stock solution was pipetted into a 500 mL volumetric flask and diluted to volume with purified water and mixed thoroughly. The standard phosphorus solution was obtained.5.0, 10.0, 15.0, 20.0, and 25.0 mL of the standard phosphorus solution (resp., 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50μg of phosphorus) were, respectively, pipetted into respective 50 mL volumetric flasks. 4 mL of 2% ammonium molybdate solutions was added to each of five volumetric flasks. And then 2 mL of 5% ascorbic acid solutions and distilled water were added to each of five volumetric flasks to make a total volume of about 45 mL and mixed thoroughly. The flasks were placed in a boiling water bath for 10 minutes and removed and cooled to 25°C in an ice bath. Finally, the above solutions were diluted to a total volume of 50 mL with distilled water and mixed completely. Each of standard solutions was determined in a 1 cm cuvette at 825 nm by a VI-1501 spectrophotometer (Tianjin Gangdong Sci. & Tech. Development Co., Ltd., China). The equation of the standard curve was expressed as follows:(8)absorbance=0.02354+0.01171×phosphorus  contentμg/mL.0.300 g of samples weighed accurately was placed in a 100 mL digestion flask, and then 15 mL of mixed acid (volume ratio of concentrated sulfuric acid with a concentration of 96% to concentrated nitric acid with a concentration of 65% was  equal to 1) was added and well mixed. The mixture in the bottle was heated slowly to the liquid boiling. The mixture was continuously heated until the brown gas was turned white, and the liquid in the bottle became transparent to remove the excess nitric acid solutions. After the above solution was cooled to the room temperature, 45 mL of distilled water was added to the solutions. The pH value of the solutions was adjusted to be neutral with 10 mol/L sodium hydroxide solutions. And then the solutions in the bottle were moved into a 100 mL volumetric flask and diluted to a total volume of 100 mL with distilled water and shaken thoroughly. 25 mL of the sample solutions was accurately taken into a 50 mL conical flask. And then 4 mL of 2% ammonium molybdate solutions and 2 mL of 5% ascorbic acid solutions were pipetted, respectively, into the sample solutions and mixed fully. After the conical flask was placed in a boiling water bath for 10 minutes, it was taken out and cooled to the room temperature in an ice bath. The above liquid was moved into a 50 mL volumetric flask and diluted to a total volume of 50 mL with the distilled water and mixed uniformly. The absorbance of the solution was determined with a VI-1501 spectrophotometer (Tianjin Gangdong Sci. & Tech. Development Co., Ltd., China) at 825 nm wavelength. The blank determination on the distilled water was corrected. The calculation formula of the combined phosphorus content was as follows [32]:(9)phosphorus  content%=m1×V0×100m0×V1×1000,where m0 is the mass of the samples (g), m1 is the phosphorus content of the samples obtained from the standard curve (mg), V0 is the volume of the sample solutions (100 mL), and V1 is the equal volume of the sample solutions used for the determination (25 mL).


### 2.8. Freeze-Thaw Stability

The paste of the sample was prepared by mixing 0.5 g of GG or its derivative (dry mass) with 99.5 g of the distilled water. The paste was heated in the water bath to 95°C until it became uniform and then cooled to the ambient temperature. 10 g of the paste weighted precisely was added to each of the preweighed 10 mL centrifuge tubes, and these paste samples were frozen at −18°C in a BCD-177A freezer (Hefei Meiling Co., Ltd., China) for 24 h. All tubes were removed from the freezer and thawed at 30°C in the water bath for 2 h. Three tubes from each thawing cycle of these samples were centrifuged by a TDL80-2B desk centrifuge (Shanghai Anting Scientific Instrument Factory, China) at 3000 r/min for 15 min. The clear liquid was decanted, and the residue was weighed. The separated water percentage was then calculated as the ratio of the mass of the decanted liquid to the total mass of the paste before the centrifugation and multiplied by 100. The low separated water percentage means high freeze-thaw stability [33, 34].


### 2.9. Swelling Power

0.1 g of the sample weighed precisely based on the dry sample was added in preweighed 25 mL of the centrifugal tube; the distilled water was then added to give a total volume of water equivalent to 19.9 g. After that, the centrifugal tube was immediately placed in the water bath whose temperature was controlled at 85°C and continuously shaken for 30 min. The centrifugal tube was taken out, wiped dry, and placed on a balance. And then the distilled water was added to the centrifugal tube to bring paste to the total weight of 20 g. After capping, the centrifugal tube was centrifuged by a TDL80-2B desk centrifuge (Shanghai Anting Scientific Instrument Factory, China) at 3000 r/min for about 15 min. To measure the solubility, 10 mL of the supernatant was transferred into an evaporating Petri dish and dried overnight in a 1010-2 electrothermal constant-temperature dry box (Jintan City Dadi Automation Instrument Factory, China) at 105°C. The dried residue was then cooled in the desiccator and weighed for the soluble sample. To measure the swelling power, the residual supernatant was carefully removed and discarded. The bottle with the sediment paste was then weighed to give the weight of the swollen sample granules. The result was expressed by the calculation as [35, 36]:(10)swellingpower%=massofsedimentpaste×100mass  of  sample  on  dry  basis×100-%solubility,solubility%=mass  of  dried  residue  of  supernatant×100mass  of  sample  on  dry  basis.


### 2.10. Determination of Cold and Hot Viscosity Stability

The cold and hot viscosity refers to the viscosity of samples at 50°C and 95°C, respectively. The viscosity of samples was determined by a NDJ-1 rotational viscometer (Shanghai Precision Instrument Co., Ltd., China). The stability of the viscosity is determined from the following formula:(11)stability  of  viscosity%=100-fluctuation  ratio  of  viscosity%.The fluctuation ratio of the viscosity is expressed as follows:(12)fluctuation  ratio  of  viscosity%=max⁡η-η′η′′×100,where max⁡η-η′ is the maximum viscosity difference measured by keeping temperature constant for 60 min, 90 min, 120 min, 150 min, and 180 min, respectively, at 50°C or 95°C. η′′ is the viscosity measured by keeping the temperature constant for 1 hour at 95°C or 50°C [37, 38].


### 2.11. Covalent Binding

5 g of DCLGG powders was weighed and then dispersed in 50 mL of L-asparagine aqueous ethanol solutions (mass ratio of ethanol to water is 5 : 4) with a mass concentration of 2%. The pH value of the suspension was adjusted to 4.0 with 0.1 mol/L HCl and then stirred and heated in the water bath to 45°C. The binding was carried out for 5 h. The suspension was filtrated, and the obtained filtered cake was washed by ethanol aqueous solutions with a mass concentration of 60% until the pH of the washed liquid was down to about 7.0. The resultant cake was dried at 80°C for about 5 h in a 1010-2 electrothermal constant-temperature dry box (Jintan City Dadi Automation Instrument Factory, China) so the moisture content could be less than 12%. The adsorption capacity of DCLGG was determined by the nitrogen content [39, 40]. The formula of DCLGG reacting with L-asparagine in the weak alkaline environment was as follows:(13)


### 2.12. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

An IR Prestige-21 infrared spectrometer with 2 cm−1 resolution (Shimadzu Corporation, Japan) was used to record the FTIR spectra within the range of 4000–400 cm−1. The FTIR spectra were recorded in the solid state using a KB pellet method. The dry sample was blended with KBr in a ratio sample/KBr 1 : 100. The blend was pressed to obtain a pellet [41].


### 2.13. Thermal Analysis

The thermal analysis of GG or its derivatives was carried out with a TGA Q50 V20.10 Build 36 thermogravimetric analyzer and a DSC Q20 V24.4 Build 116 differential scanning calorimeter (TA Instruments) in a nitrogen atmosphere. To properly characterize the thermal properties of GG and GG derivatives, the mixture needed to be analyzed in a sealed pan in order to prevent the loss of water from the formulation during heating.Analysis Conditions of DSC. Sample mass is 4.0–5.0 mg, heating rate is 10°C/min, temperature range is 10–200°C, and nitrogen flow is 50.0 mL/min [42].Analysis Conditions of TGA. Sample mass is 6.0–7.0 mg, heating rate is 10°C/min, temperature range is 10–800°C, and nitrogen flow is 60.0 mL/min [43].


### 2.14. Particle Morphology

The particle morphology of sample was observed by a XPL-2 transflective polarizing microscope (Nanjing Jiangnan Yongxin Optics Co., Ltd.). The slide with the sample particles was put and moved under the object lens of the polarizing microscope. The appropriate viewing area was selected to observe the size and the shape of the sample particles [44].


### 2.15. Statistical Analysis

The data were expressed as means of the triplicate determinations. The statistical significance was assessed with one-way analysis of the variance using Design-Expert 6.0.5 for Windows program. The treatment means were considered to have extremely significant difference atP≤0.001 and significant difference at P≤0.05.


## 2.1. Materials

Guar gum was purchased from Binzhou ZHONGBO Chemical Co., Ltd. L-asparagine was purchased from Chengdu Herbpurify Co., Ltd. Sodium hydroxide, ammonium molybdate, and ethanol were purchased from Shenyang Xinhua Reagent Factory. Phosphorus oxychloride was purchased from Xuzhou Fine Chemical Co., Ltd. Hydrochloric acid was purchased from Shenyang Paier Fine Chemical Co., Ltd. Sodium periodate was purchased from Shenyang Chemical Reagent Factory. Potassium dihydrogen phosphate was purchased from Shenyang Chemical Reagent Factory. Ascorbic acid was purchased from Northeast Pharmaceutical General Factory. Sulfuric acid was purchased from Tianjin City Fuyu Chemical Co., Ltd. Nitric acid was purchased from Shenyang Huizhong Chemical reagent Co., Ltd. All above reagents were of analytical grade.


## 2.2. Preparation of Cross-Linked Guar Gum (CLGG)

56 g of dry GG powders (moisture content = 11.0%) weighed accurately and 144 g of ethanol solutions with a mass concentration of 90% were mixed to produce the guar gum slurry with a mass concentration of 28% by mass basis. The slurry was put into 250 mL of the three-necked flask and then stirred and heated to 30°C in the water bath. The pH value of slurry was first adjusted to 11.0 by the sodium hydroxide solutions with a mass concentration of 4%. Five minutes later, 0.6 g of phosphorus oxychloride was slowly dropped into the slurry under keeping the pH of the slurry constant by above sodium hydroxide solutions. The reaction was carried out for 1 h. After the reaction ended, the vacuum filtration of the slurry was then conducted. The obtained filtered cake was washed by ethanol aqueous solutions with a mass concentration of 60% until the pH of the washed liquid was 6.5 to 7.0. The resultant cake was dried at 60°C for about 2 h in a 1010-2 electrothermal constant-temperature dry box (Jintan City Dadi Automation Instrument Factory) so that the moisture content could be less than 12%. The dried cake was ground and screened. Finally, the CLGG was obtained [23]. The formula of guar gum reacting with phosphorus oxychloride was as follows:(1)(2)(3)POCl3+3H2O⟶H3PO4+HCl


## 2.3. Preparation of Dialdehyde Cross-Linked Guar Gum (DCLGG)

10 g of the cross-linking guar gum powders (sedimentation volume = 2.4 mL or phosphorus content = 0.024%) was weighed and then dispersed in sodium periodate aqueous ethanol solutions with a mass concentration of 10% to produce the guar gum slurry with a concentration of 10% by mass basis. The pH value of slurry was adjusted to 2.0–6.0 by 0.1 mol/L HCl and then stirred and heated to 30–50°C in the water bath. The reaction was carried out for a certain time. After the reaction ended, the vacuum filtration of the slurry was then conducted. The obtained cake was washed by the ethanol solutions with a mass concentration of 60% for about four times until there were no periodate ion and iodate ion in the modified guar gum particles. The resultant cake was dried at 60°C for about 2 h in a 1010-2 electrothermal constant-temperature dry box (Jintan City Dadi Automation Instrument Factory) so that the moisture content could be less than 12%. The dried cake was ground and screened. Finally, the DCLGG was obtained [24–26]. The formula of GG reacting with sodium periodate in acidic environment was as follows:(4)


## 2.4. Sedimentation Volume

0.2 g of the dry based sample was weighed and put into a 100 mL beaker, and then 40 mL of the distilled water was added. The slurry was heated in the water bath at 85°C for 5 min. The distilled water was then added to bring the total weight to be 40.2 g again. At the same time, the mixture was stirred thoroughly and cooled to the room temperature. 10 mL of mixture was transferred to two 10 mL graduated cylinders which were sealed with a cap and centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 10 min. The clear liquid was decanted, and the volume of the clear liquid was determined. The smaller the sedimentation volume was, the bigger the cross-linking degree would be. The sedimentation volume was expressed by the calculation as follows [27, 28]:(5)Vs=10-V,where Vs is the sedimentation volume (mL) and V is the volume of the clear liquid (mL).


## 2.5. Aldehyde Content

The aldehyde content was determined using the modified method of the quantitative alkali consumption described by previous study [29, 30]. 0.15–0.20 g of the sample of DCLGG was weighed, transferred to a 100 mL conical flask, and dispersed in 10 mL of 0.25 mol/L sodium hydroxide. The conical flask was shaken until the slight yellow solutions were obtained. The solutions were placed in the water bath and heated for two minutes at 70°C and then rapidly cooled to the room temperature. 15.0 mL of 0.125 mol/L sulphuric acid and 30 mL of the distilled water were added. Few drops of the phenolphthalein as an indicator were added and titrated with sodium hydroxide 0.25 mol/L to the permanent pink color. The aldehyde content was calculated as follows:(6)aldehydecontent%=V1×C1-2V2×C2×161m1-X×100%,where m is the mass of the sample (g), X is the moisture content of the sample (%), V2 is the volume of 0.125 mol/L H2SO4 (mL), V1 is the volume of 0.25 mol/L NaOH used to titrate the sample (mL), C1 is the concentration of NaOH (mol/L), and C2 is the concentration of H2SO4 (mol/L).


## 2.6. Nitrogen Content

The nitrogen content in the samples was determined by the improved Kjeldahl method. The accurately weighed sample (2.000±0.05 g) was placed in a digestion flask, and then 2 g of zinc powders and a few glass beads were added to the flask. After the flask was placed in the inclined position, 20 mL of concentrated H2SO4 was added. The flask was shaken until the samples were thoroughly mixed with H2SO4. The mixture was heated by a heating jacket. When the color of the mixture became green, the digestion flask was removed from a heating jacket and slowly shaken until the sample on the flask wall was washed down into the mixture. Then, the digestion flask was placed back on the heating jacket again. When the color of the mixture was clear blue green and the blue green was maintained for about half an hour, the flask was taken off the heating jacket and cooled to the room temperature. The inner wall of the flask was rinsed with 300 mL of the distilled water. Afterwards, the flask was connected to a condenser, into which the condensed water was introduced. The distillate was collected by a 300 mL conical flask containing 30 mL of 2% boric acid solutions (w/w) and 3–5 drops of methyl red indicator. The tip of the condenser was immersed in the boric acid solutions. A few zinc granules and 80 mL of 35% sodium hydroxide solutions (w/w) were added to the flask under the sealed condition through the funnel. At this time, the liquid in the flak was blue or brown. The hose of adding alkali was tightened in order to completely seal the liquid. The distillation was conducted by the heating jacket. When liquid in the conical flask was 200 mL, the distillation stopped. The condenser’s top and end were rinsed two times with little distilled water. The washing liquid was then collected in the conical flask. The distillate in the conical flask was titrated with 0.02 mol/L HCl standard solutions. The blank determination on reagents was corrected. The nitrogen content was calculated as follows [31]: (7)nitrogen  content%=V1-V0C×0.014m1-X×100,where C is the concentration of HCl standard solutions (mol/L), V0 is the volume of 0.02 mol/L HCl standard solutions to titrate the blank (mol/L), V1 is the volume of 0.02 mol/L HCl standard solutions to titrate the samples (mol/L), m is the mass of the samples (g), and X is the moisture content of the samples (%).


## 2.7. Determination of Phosphorus Content

0.4395 g of potassium dihydrogen phosphate weighed exactly was dissolved in 500 mL of purified water in a 1 L volumetric flask and diluted to volume with distilled water and mixed thoroughly. 10.0 mL of the stock solution was pipetted into a 500 mL volumetric flask and diluted to volume with purified water and mixed thoroughly. The standard phosphorus solution was obtained.5.0, 10.0, 15.0, 20.0, and 25.0 mL of the standard phosphorus solution (resp., 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50μg of phosphorus) were, respectively, pipetted into respective 50 mL volumetric flasks. 4 mL of 2% ammonium molybdate solutions was added to each of five volumetric flasks. And then 2 mL of 5% ascorbic acid solutions and distilled water were added to each of five volumetric flasks to make a total volume of about 45 mL and mixed thoroughly. The flasks were placed in a boiling water bath for 10 minutes and removed and cooled to 25°C in an ice bath. Finally, the above solutions were diluted to a total volume of 50 mL with distilled water and mixed completely. Each of standard solutions was determined in a 1 cm cuvette at 825 nm by a VI-1501 spectrophotometer (Tianjin Gangdong Sci. & Tech. Development Co., Ltd., China). The equation of the standard curve was expressed as follows:(8)absorbance=0.02354+0.01171×phosphorus  contentμg/mL.0.300 g of samples weighed accurately was placed in a 100 mL digestion flask, and then 15 mL of mixed acid (volume ratio of concentrated sulfuric acid with a concentration of 96% to concentrated nitric acid with a concentration of 65% was  equal to 1) was added and well mixed. The mixture in the bottle was heated slowly to the liquid boiling. The mixture was continuously heated until the brown gas was turned white, and the liquid in the bottle became transparent to remove the excess nitric acid solutions. After the above solution was cooled to the room temperature, 45 mL of distilled water was added to the solutions. The pH value of the solutions was adjusted to be neutral with 10 mol/L sodium hydroxide solutions. And then the solutions in the bottle were moved into a 100 mL volumetric flask and diluted to a total volume of 100 mL with distilled water and shaken thoroughly. 25 mL of the sample solutions was accurately taken into a 50 mL conical flask. And then 4 mL of 2% ammonium molybdate solutions and 2 mL of 5% ascorbic acid solutions were pipetted, respectively, into the sample solutions and mixed fully. After the conical flask was placed in a boiling water bath for 10 minutes, it was taken out and cooled to the room temperature in an ice bath. The above liquid was moved into a 50 mL volumetric flask and diluted to a total volume of 50 mL with the distilled water and mixed uniformly. The absorbance of the solution was determined with a VI-1501 spectrophotometer (Tianjin Gangdong Sci. & Tech. Development Co., Ltd., China) at 825 nm wavelength. The blank determination on the distilled water was corrected. The calculation formula of the combined phosphorus content was as follows [32]:(9)phosphorus  content%=m1×V0×100m0×V1×1000,where m0 is the mass of the samples (g), m1 is the phosphorus content of the samples obtained from the standard curve (mg), V0 is the volume of the sample solutions (100 mL), and V1 is the equal volume of the sample solutions used for the determination (25 mL).


## 2.8. Freeze-Thaw Stability

The paste of the sample was prepared by mixing 0.5 g of GG or its derivative (dry mass) with 99.5 g of the distilled water. The paste was heated in the water bath to 95°C until it became uniform and then cooled to the ambient temperature. 10 g of the paste weighted precisely was added to each of the preweighed 10 mL centrifuge tubes, and these paste samples were frozen at −18°C in a BCD-177A freezer (Hefei Meiling Co., Ltd., China) for 24 h. All tubes were removed from the freezer and thawed at 30°C in the water bath for 2 h. Three tubes from each thawing cycle of these samples were centrifuged by a TDL80-2B desk centrifuge (Shanghai Anting Scientific Instrument Factory, China) at 3000 r/min for 15 min. The clear liquid was decanted, and the residue was weighed. The separated water percentage was then calculated as the ratio of the mass of the decanted liquid to the total mass of the paste before the centrifugation and multiplied by 100. The low separated water percentage means high freeze-thaw stability [33, 34].


## 2.9. Swelling Power

0.1 g of the sample weighed precisely based on the dry sample was added in preweighed 25 mL of the centrifugal tube; the distilled water was then added to give a total volume of water equivalent to 19.9 g. After that, the centrifugal tube was immediately placed in the water bath whose temperature was controlled at 85°C and continuously shaken for 30 min. The centrifugal tube was taken out, wiped dry, and placed on a balance. And then the distilled water was added to the centrifugal tube to bring paste to the total weight of 20 g. After capping, the centrifugal tube was centrifuged by a TDL80-2B desk centrifuge (Shanghai Anting Scientific Instrument Factory, China) at 3000 r/min for about 15 min. To measure the solubility, 10 mL of the supernatant was transferred into an evaporating Petri dish and dried overnight in a 1010-2 electrothermal constant-temperature dry box (Jintan City Dadi Automation Instrument Factory, China) at 105°C. The dried residue was then cooled in the desiccator and weighed for the soluble sample. To measure the swelling power, the residual supernatant was carefully removed and discarded. The bottle with the sediment paste was then weighed to give the weight of the swollen sample granules. The result was expressed by the calculation as [35, 36]:(10)swellingpower%=massofsedimentpaste×100mass  of  sample  on  dry  basis×100-%solubility,solubility%=mass  of  dried  residue  of  supernatant×100mass  of  sample  on  dry  basis.


## 2.10. Determination of Cold and Hot Viscosity Stability

The cold and hot viscosity refers to the viscosity of samples at 50°C and 95°C, respectively. The viscosity of samples was determined by a NDJ-1 rotational viscometer (Shanghai Precision Instrument Co., Ltd., China). The stability of the viscosity is determined from the following formula:(11)stability  of  viscosity%=100-fluctuation  ratio  of  viscosity%.The fluctuation ratio of the viscosity is expressed as follows:(12)fluctuation  ratio  of  viscosity%=max⁡η-η′η′′×100,where max⁡η-η′ is the maximum viscosity difference measured by keeping temperature constant for 60 min, 90 min, 120 min, 150 min, and 180 min, respectively, at 50°C or 95°C. η′′ is the viscosity measured by keeping the temperature constant for 1 hour at 95°C or 50°C [37, 38].


## 2.11. Covalent Binding

5 g of DCLGG powders was weighed and then dispersed in 50 mL of L-asparagine aqueous ethanol solutions (mass ratio of ethanol to water is 5 : 4) with a mass concentration of 2%. The pH value of the suspension was adjusted to 4.0 with 0.1 mol/L HCl and then stirred and heated in the water bath to 45°C. The binding was carried out for 5 h. The suspension was filtrated, and the obtained filtered cake was washed by ethanol aqueous solutions with a mass concentration of 60% until the pH of the washed liquid was down to about 7.0. The resultant cake was dried at 80°C for about 5 h in a 1010-2 electrothermal constant-temperature dry box (Jintan City Dadi Automation Instrument Factory, China) so the moisture content could be less than 12%. The adsorption capacity of DCLGG was determined by the nitrogen content [39, 40]. The formula of DCLGG reacting with L-asparagine in the weak alkaline environment was as follows:(13)


## 2.12. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

An IR Prestige-21 infrared spectrometer with 2 cm−1 resolution (Shimadzu Corporation, Japan) was used to record the FTIR spectra within the range of 4000–400 cm−1. The FTIR spectra were recorded in the solid state using a KB pellet method. The dry sample was blended with KBr in a ratio sample/KBr 1 : 100. The blend was pressed to obtain a pellet [41].


## 2.13. Thermal Analysis

The thermal analysis of GG or its derivatives was carried out with a TGA Q50 V20.10 Build 36 thermogravimetric analyzer and a DSC Q20 V24.4 Build 116 differential scanning calorimeter (TA Instruments) in a nitrogen atmosphere. To properly characterize the thermal properties of GG and GG derivatives, the mixture needed to be analyzed in a sealed pan in order to prevent the loss of water from the formulation during heating.Analysis Conditions of DSC. Sample mass is 4.0–5.0 mg, heating rate is 10°C/min, temperature range is 10–200°C, and nitrogen flow is 50.0 mL/min [42].Analysis Conditions of TGA. Sample mass is 6.0–7.0 mg, heating rate is 10°C/min, temperature range is 10–800°C, and nitrogen flow is 60.0 mL/min [43].


## 2.14. Particle Morphology

The particle morphology of sample was observed by a XPL-2 transflective polarizing microscope (Nanjing Jiangnan Yongxin Optics Co., Ltd.). The slide with the sample particles was put and moved under the object lens of the polarizing microscope. The appropriate viewing area was selected to observe the size and the shape of the sample particles [44].


## 2.15. Statistical Analysis

The data were expressed as means of the triplicate determinations. The statistical significance was assessed with one-way analysis of the variance using Design-Expert 6.0.5 for Windows program. The treatment means were considered to have extremely significant difference atP≤0.001 and significant difference at P≤0.05.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Effect of Reaction Time, Reaction Temperature, pH, Amount of Sodium Periodate, and Amount of Ethanol on Aldehyde Content of DCLGG

The effect of the reaction time, reaction temperature, pH, amount of sodium periodate, and amount of ethanol on aldehyde content of DCLGG was shown in Figure1. The amount of sodium periodate was defined as the percentage of the mass ratio of sodium periodate to dry cross-linked guar gum. The amount of ethanol was defined as the percentage of the mass ratio of ethanol to slurry.Figure 1
Effect of reaction time, reaction temperature, pH, amount of sodium periodate, and amount of ethanol on the aldehyde content of DCLGG.
(a)
Reaction conditions: reaction temperature = 40°C, amount of sodium periodate = 30%, amount of ethanol = 77%, and pH = 4 (b)
Reaction conditions: reaction time = 3 h, amount of sodium periodate = 30%, amount of ethanol = 77%, and pH = 4 (c)
Reaction conditions: reaction time = 3 h, reaction temperature = 40°C, amount of sodium periodate = 30%, and amount of ethanol = 77% (d)
Reaction conditions: reaction time = 3 h, reaction temperature = 40°C, pH = 4, and amount of ethanol = 77% (e)
Reaction conditions: reaction time = 3 h, reaction temperature = 40°C, pH = 4, and amount of sodium periodate = 30%From Figure1(a), the aldehyde content of DCLGG increased with increasing the reaction time when the reaction time was less than 3.0 h. The aldehyde content of DCLGG did not change basically with the increase of the reaction time when the reaction time was more than 3 h. The causes for this could be explained as follows. As the reaction time increased, the increase of the effective contact between the molecules of GG and molecules of sodium periodate promoted the oxidization reaction. However, the sodium periodate was depleted as the oxidization reaction proceeded. The oxidization reaction would not continue when the concentration of sodium periodate was reduced to a certain value. So the suitable reaction time was considered to be 3 h.The reaction temperature was varied from 30 to 50°C to examine the temperature effects. From Figure1(b), when the reaction temperature was less than 40°C, the aldehyde content of DCLGG increased with increasing the reaction temperature. When the reaction temperature was more than 40°C, however, the aldehyde content of DCLGG decreased with increasing the reaction temperature. The reason might be explained as follows: as the reaction temperature increased, the thermal motion of sodium periodate molecules was accelerated, which was in favor of the diffusion of sodium periodate into the particles. It resulted in the more hydroxyl groups on GG particles being oxidized. On the other hand, the elevated temperature would lead to the more side reaction of sodium periodate and the large expansion of the GG grains, which reduced the number of the holes on the GG grains. As a result, the reaction temperature influenced the oxidization. So, the suitable reaction temperature was considered to be 40°C.The pH was varied from 2 to 6 to examine the effects of the pH. From Figure1(c), when the pH was less than 4, the aldehyde content of DCLGG increased with increasing the pH. When the pH value was more than 4, however, the aldehyde content of DCLGG decreased with increasing the pH. The causes for this could be explained as follows: during the oxidization, sodium periodate was first obliged to be transformed into the periodic acid under the acid condition, and then the oxidization of CLGG was able to be carried out. Therefore, when the pH value was more than 4, it was not in favor of the transformation of sodium periodate into the periodic acid. This resulted in the efficiency of the oxidization to be lowered. But the degree of the acetal or hemiacetal cross-linking formation increased because the aldehyde group reacted with the hydroxyl group between DCLGG molecules or within DCLGG molecules when the pH of the oxidization was less than 4. So, the suitable pH was considered to be 4 in this system.The amount of sodium periodate was varied from 10% to 30% to examine the effects of sodium periodate. From Figure1(d), the aldehyde content of DCGG increased with the increase of the amount of sodium periodate. The effective collision was proportional to the concentration of reactants, and reaction rate was proportional to the collision frequency. When the amount of sodium periodate was very low, the collision frequency decreased, which led to a very low reaction rate. So, the amount of sodium periodate was selected to be 30% for considering the actual needs of DCGG.During sodium periodate oxidization, the action of ethanol as a solvent only kept GG in a granular form. The amount of ethanol was varied from 51% to 78% to examine the effects of ethanol at the fixed other parameters. From Figure1(e), the aldehyde content of DCLGG increased with the increase of the amount of ethanol. But the aldehyde content of DCLGG was changed slightly with the increase of the amount of ethanol. And the value, where the amount of ethanol reached 78%, was basically close to the maximum in this system. So, the amount of ethanol was selected to be 78%.


### 3.2. Optimization of Processing Parameters

#### 3.2.1. Design and Results of Response Surface Test

The process parameters for preparing DCLGG were further optimized using the dialdehyde content as the response value by the Box-Behnken design, which was used to develop a correlation between the condition variables and the dialdehyde content. The factors and levels of the response surface test for DCLGG were shown in Table1. Accordingly, the design and results of the response surface test were shown in Table 2. The amount of sodium periodate was held at 30%.Table 1
Factors and levels of response surface test for DCLGG.
Factors and levels Reaction temperature (A)/°C Reaction time (B)/h pH (C) Amount of ethanol (D)/% - 1 35 2.5 3 61 0 40 3.0 4 68 1 45 3.5 5 77Table 2
Design and results of response surface test for DCLGG.
Test numbers A B C D Aldehyde content/% 1 45.00 3.50 4.00 71.00 25.12 2 40.00 3.00 4.00 71.00 27.5 3 40.00 3.50 4.00 63.00 25.08 4 45.00 2.50 4.00 71.00 22.39 5 35.00 3.00 5.00 71.00 23.56 6 35.00 3.00 4.00 78.00 25.12 7 45.00 3.00 4.00 78.00 27.61 8 45.00 3.00 3.00 71.00 20.51 9 35.00 3.00 4.00 63.00 24.82 10 40.00 3.50 5.00 71.00 23.36 11 45.00 3.00 5.00 71.00 23.97 12 35.00 3.50 4.00 71.00 25.09 13 40.00 3.50 4.00 78.00 25.49 14 40.00 3.00 4.00 71.00 27.5 15 40.00 2.50 4.00 63.00 19.36 16 40.00 2.50 3.00 71.00 18.5 17 40.00 3.00 5.00 63.00 19.82 18 45.00 3.00 4.00 63.00 22.82 19 40.00 3.00 4.00 71.00 27.5 20 40.00 3.50 3.00 71.00 19.59 21 40.00 3.00 3.00 78.00 21.01 22 40.00 3.00 5.00 78.00 26.43 23 40.00 2.50 4.00 78.00 25.02 24 40.00 3.00 4.00 71.00 27.5 25 40.00 3.00 4.00 71.00 27.5 26 40.00 3.00 3.00 63.00 20.14 27 35.00 3.00 3.00 71.00 21.66 28 35.00 2.50 4.00 71.00 22.39 29 40.00 2.50 5.00 71.00 18.72


#### 3.2.2. Mathematical Model and Variance Analysis

By applying multiple regression analysis on the experimental data, the second-order response surface model for preparing DCLGG was as follows:(14)Y=27.4-0.068A+1.5B+1.14C+1.55D-0.93A2-2.8B2-4.41C2-1.13D2+0.0075AB+0.39AC+1.11AD+0.89BC-1.32BD+1.43CD,where Y is the predicted response, that is, the aldehyde content, and A, B, C, and D are the test variables such as the reaction temperature, reaction time, pH, and amount of ethanol, respectively.The analysis of the variance (ANOVA) was performed to check the significance of the fit of the second-order polynomial equation for the experimental data, and the results were given in Table3. From Table 3, the prob. level of the regression with a very low probability value (<0.0001) indicated that the model was highly significant. The goodness of fit of the model was checked by the determination coefficient (R2) of 99.03%. In this case, R2 value (0.9903) for the above equation indicated that the sample variation for DCLGG of 99.03% was attributed to the independent variables and only 0.97% of the total variation cannot be explained by the model. The adjusted determination coefficient (adj. R2=0.9805) was also satisfactory for confirming the significance of the model.Table 3
Variance analysis of response surface test.
Source Square sum Freedom degree Mean square F-ratio Prob. level Significance level Regression 247.69 14 17.69 101.59 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ A 0.055 1 0.055 0.31 0.5843 B 27.0 1 27.0 155.01 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ C 15.52 1 15.52 89.14 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ D 28.95 1 29.95 166.25 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ A 2 5.65 1 5.65 32.44 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ B 2 50.93 1 50.93 292.44 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ C 2 125.98 1 125.98 723.39 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ D 2 8.15 1 8.15 46.8 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ A B 0.00023 1 0.00023 0.00129 0.9718 A C 0.61 1 0.61 3.49 0.0827 A D 3.15 1 4.94 28.37 0.0011 B C 4.94 1 3.15 18.09 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ B D 6.94 1 6.94 39.86 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ C D 8.16 1 8.16 46.85 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ Residuals 2.44 14 0.17 Lack of fit 2.44 10 0.24 Pure error 0.000 4 0.000 Sum 10.75 28 E x t r e m e l y   ∗ ∗ significant difference at P≤0.001. Note:significant difference at P≤0.05.The probability level was used as a tool to check the significance of each of the coefficients. SmallerP value denoted the greater significance of the corresponding coefficient. From the variance analysis in Table 3, it was possible to identify factors affecting the relative importance of the aldehyde content. The order from the primary to secondary was the amount of ethanol, reaction time, pH, and reaction temperature in turn. The independent variable (B,C,D), squared variables (A2,B2,C2,D2), and interaction (BD,BC,CD) had a high significant effect. All the independent variables had a positive coefficient except for the variable (A). The negative signs of the independent variable (A), the BD interaction, and squared variables (A2,B2,C2,D2) revealed a reduction in the aldehyde content when these corresponding variables were increased. However, the independent variable (A) and interaction (AB,AC,AD) were not significant. So the equation discussed above was further simplified as (15)Y=2.74+1.5B+1.14C+1.55D-0.93A2-2.8B2-4.41C2-1.13D2+0.89BC-1.32BD+1.43CD.The optimal values of pH, amount of ethanol, reaction temperature, and time estimated in actual units were 4.1, 74.52%, 39.88°C, and 3.04 h, respectively, with the predicted aldehyde content of 28.1%. According to the realistic conditions, the pH, amount of ethanol, reaction temperature, and reaction time were adjusted to 4.0, 74.5%, 40°C, and 3.0 h, respectively.


#### 3.2.3. Interaction of Variables

The response surfaces as the function of two variables at the center level of other variables were shown in Figures2, 3, and 4, respectively. The three-dimensional response surface plot was a 3D graphic representation of the regression equation showing the individual and cumulative effect of the variable and the mutual interaction between the variables.Figure 2
Mutual effect of amount of ethanol and reaction time at fixed pH of 4 and reaction temperature of 40°C.Figure 3
Mutual effect of amount of ethanol and pH at fixed reaction temperature of 40°C and reaction time of 3 h.Figure 4
Mutual effect of reaction time and pH at fixed reaction temperature of 40°C and amount of ethanol of 74.5%.From Figure2, the aldehyde content of DCLGG increased with increasing the amount of ethanol when the pH and reaction temperature were fixed at 4 and 40°C, respectively. But the influence of the reaction time on the aldehyde content of DCLGG was different from the amount of ethanol with increasing the reaction time. The aldehyde content of DCLGG was found to first increase with the increase of the reaction time from 2.5 to 3.0 and thereafter decreased with the further increase of the reaction time from 3.0 to 3.5.From Figure3, the response surface as the function of the amount of ethanol and pH was obviously different from the response surface as the function of the amount of ethanol and reaction time when the reaction temperature and reaction time were fixed at 40°C and 3 h, respectively. The aldehyde content of DCLGG was obviously influenced by the pH, compared with the amount of ethanol.From Figure4, the effect of the pH or reaction time on the aldehyde content of DCLGG displayed first the increase and then the decrease with increasing the pH or reaction time when the reaction temperature and amount of ethanol were fixed at 40°C and 74.5%, respectively. The response surface was like the parabolic surface.


#### 3.2.4. Verification of Model

The parallel test was conducted three times under the above adjusted optimal parameters again. The mean experimental value for the aldehyde content of DCLGG was obtained to be 27.75% under these optimum conditions, which was 1.3% lower than the predicted value. It revealed the high accuracy of the model.


### 3.3. Relationship between Sedimentation Volume and Phosphorus Content

The relationship of sedimentation volume and phosphorus content for CLGG was shown in Table4. From Table 4, the sedimentation volume decreased with increasing the phosphorus content. The smaller the sedimentation volume was, the bigger the cross-linking degree was. It proved that the cross-linking degree of GG was expressed indirectly by the sedimentation volume.Table 4
The relationship between sedimentation volume and phosphorus content for CLGG.
Samples Phosphorus content/% CLGG (sedimentation volume = 3.5 mL) 0.0163 CLGG (sedimentation volume = 2.4 mL) 0.0240 CLGG (sedimentation volume = 1.3 mL) 0.0495


### 3.4. Effect of Cross-Linking and Oxidation on Freeze-Thaw Stability and Swelling Power

The freeze-thaw stability and swelling power of GG, CLGG (sedimentation volume = 2.4 mL), DGG (aldehyde content = 24.7%), and DCLGG (aldehyde content = 24.7%; sedimentation volume = 2.4 mL) were shown in Table5. The high separated water percentage meant the poor freeze-thaw stability. When the paste of GG, CLGG, DGG, and DCLGG was frozen, the phase separation occurred with the formation of the ice crystals. The extent of the phase separation increased with increasing the additional freeze-thaw cycles. From Table 5, the cross-linking and oxidization increased the freeze-thaw stability of GG. The cross-linking only increased the swelling power of GG, which improved dramatically its release effect. However, the oxidization decreased the swelling power of GG. It resulted in the fact that the swelling power of DCLGG was between the swelling power of CLGG and the swelling power of DGG. The cross-linking made up the reduction of the swelling power of GG owing to the oxidization.Table 5
Effect of cross-linking and oxidation on freeze-thaw stability and swelling power of GG.
Samples Separated water percentage/% Swelling power/% GG 94.7 39.0 CLGG 82.9 51.3 DGG 84.8 21.6 DCLGG 80.6 34.1


### 3.5. Effect of Cross-Linking and Oxidation on Cold and Hot Viscosity Stability

The cold viscosity stability and hot viscosity stability of GG, CLGG (sedimentation volume = 2.4 mL), DGG (aldehyde content = 24.7%), and DCLGG (aldehyde content = 24.7%; sedimentation volume = 2.4 mL) were shown in Table6. From Table 6, the cross-linking and oxidation reduced the viscosity of GG. It suggested that the paste of the derivatives had the high solid content. After GG was cross-linked or oxidized, the fluctuation ratios of the cold viscosity and hot viscosity all decreased. The fluctuation ratio of the hot viscosity was less than that of the cold viscosity. The magnitude of the cold viscosity and hot viscosity fluctuation ratios from big to small in order was GG, DGG, DCLGG, and CLGG. It suggested that the change of the hot viscosity fluctuation was in accordance with the cold viscosity fluctuation. The cross-linking and diol oxidation reduced the viscosity of GG. The situation was very helpful to form a coherent film on the surface of the substrate under the prevailing conditions. And the low viscosity was in favor of the drug coating.Table 6
Effect of cross-linking and oxidation on cold and hot viscosity stability of GG.
Samples Viscosity/mPa·s Cold viscosity stability/% Hot viscosity stability/% GG 428.0 93.3 91.3 CLGG 246.0 56.1 48.6 DGG 40.2 84.4 87.3 DCLGG 4.1 44.5 45.7


### 3.6. Effect of Cross-Linking and Oxidation on FTIR of GG

FTIR spectra of GG, CLGG (sedimentation volume = 2.4 mL), and DCLGG (aldehyde content = 24.7%; sedimentation volume = 2.4 mL) were shown in Figure5. From Figure 5, the absorption peaks of GG, CLGG, and DCLGG at the wave number of 3400 cm−1 were due to the stretching vibration of the O-H groups. The peak intensity of the O-H groups in the FTIR curves of CLGG and DCLGG was obviously different from the intensity in the FTIR curves of GG. The intensity of the O-H groups in the FTIR curves of CLGG and DCLGG was less than that of GG. However, the intensity of the O-H groups of CLGG was almost the same as that of DCLGG. It proved that the cross-linking obviously reduced the numbers of the O-H groups in GG molecules. The oxidization could not obviously change the intensity of the O-H groups of CLGG. The absorption peak of GG, CLGG, and DCLGG at the wave number of 2920 cm−1 belonged to the stretching vibration of the C-H bond. The peak intensity of the C-H bond of CLGG and DCLGG was obviously less than that of GG owing to the P=O bond. The absorption peak of DCLGG at the wave number of 1760 cm−1 was attributed to the characteristic peak of the C=O bond. It proved that the aldehyde group was successfully introduced into the molecules of GG owing to the oxidization. However, there was no difference between GG and CLGG except for the peak intensity. It suggested that the P-O-C bond in the molecules of CLGG was not determined by the infrared spectroscopy.Figure 5
IR spectra of GG, CLGG, and DCLGG.


### 3.7. DSC and TGA Analysis

The DSC and TGA curves of GG, CLGG (sedimentation volume = 2.4 mL), and DCLGG (aldehyde content = 24.7%; sedimentation volume = 2.4 mL) were shown in Figure6. According to Figure 6, after GG was modified by the cross-linking or oxidization, its onset temperature, peak temperature, end temperature, melting enthalpy, and thermal stability all were changed. The specific parameters calculated from the above-mentioned figures were listed in Tables 7 and 8. The thermogravimetric analysis of GG, CLGG, and DCLGG essentially revealed two distinct zones of the mass loss. The initial mass loss occurred due to the moisture presented in the samples. The second step represented the degradation of the polymer backbone.Table 7
Onset temperature, peak temperature, end temperature, and melting enthalpy.
Sample Onset temperature/°C Peak temperature/°C End temperature/°C Melting enthalpy/J·g−1 GG 52.6 104.6 162.33 367.8 CLGG 61.1 112.1 170.84 318.2 DCLGG 55.0 115.3 171.36 334.7Table 8
Onset decomposition temperature, end decomposition temperature, and mass loss rate.
Sample Onset End Rate of mass loss/% decomposition decomposition temperature/°C temperature/°C GG 279.8 327.1 69.0 CLGG 275.7 316.5 62.4 DCLGG 276.9 322.9 60.4Figure 6
DSC (a) and TGA (b) curves of GG, CLGG, and DCLGG.
(a) (b)The DSC curves of the polymers showed their specific endothermic peaks and melted enthalpy, which were helpful in determining the fitness of the polymers with the active compounds. From Table7, the onset temperature, peak temperature, and end temperature of CLGG or DCLGG were more than those of GG. The melting enthalpy of CLGG or DCLGG was less than that of GG. In particular, the peak temperature and end temperature of DCLGG were more than those of CLGG. The cross-liking reduced the melting enthalpy of GG. However, the oxidization increased the melting enthalpy of CLGG. In the meantime, the cross-linking increased the onset temperature of GG. But the oxidization reduced the onset temperature of CLGG.From Table8, the onset decomposition temperature, end decomposition temperature, and rate of mass loss of GG were reduced by the cross-linking or the oxidization. However, the onset decomposition temperature and end decomposition temperature of CLGG were increased by the oxidization. The data of mass loss rate proved that the thermal stability of GG was increased by the cross-linking or the oxidization.


### 3.8. Morphology Analysis

The polarizing microscope photos of GG, CLGG (sedimentation volume = 2.4 mL), and DCLGG (aldehyde content = 24.7%; sedimentation volume = 2.4 mL) were shown in Figure7. From Figure 7, there was no Maltese cross on the surface of the GG particles. The refraction of the polarized light on GG particles belonged to a single refraction. The cross-linking did not change obviously the morphology of GG particles, which displayed a linear shape. The morphology of the DCLGG particles, however, was different from that of GG, and most of the DCLGG particles were of a block shape. It suggested that the particles of GG and CLGG did swell owing to the oxidization. The appearance and size of GG granules were influenced by the aldehyde oxidization. It proved that the sodium periodate oxidization might be carried out not only on the surface of GG particles but also in its interior.Figure 7
Polarizing microscope photos of GG (a), CLGG (b), and DCLGG (c).
(a) (b) (c)


### 3.9. Binding of L-Asparagine

The binding curve of L-asparagine on DCLGG ((a) aldehyde content = 14.7%; (b) aldehyde content = 26.2%) granules was shown in Figure8. The binding capacity of DCLGG was determined by the improved Kjeldahl method. From Figure 8, the adsorption capacity of DCLGG with aldehyde content of 26.2% was more than that of DCLGG with aldehyde content of 14.7%. The adsorption capacity of DCLGG increased with the increase in the adsorption time when the adsorption time was less than 4 h. For the adsorption curve of L-asparagine on DCLGG with aldehyde content of 26.2%, the adsorption capacity of DCLGG was not changed basically with increasing the adsorption time when the adsorption time was more than 5 h. The maximum adsorption capacity of L-asparagine on DCLGG with aldehyde content of 26.2% reached 21.9 mg/g, which is obviously greater than that of the anticancer drug called doxorubicin on the dialdehyde starch nanoparticle carriers [45]. Accordingly, the maximum adsorption capacity of L-asparagine on DCLGG with aldehyde content of 14.7% was only 15.3 mg/g. The above results suggested that L-asparagine was chemically bound well by DCLGG.Figure 8
Adsorption curve of L-asparagine on DCLGG.


## 3.1. Effect of Reaction Time, Reaction Temperature, pH, Amount of Sodium Periodate, and Amount of Ethanol on Aldehyde Content of DCLGG

The effect of the reaction time, reaction temperature, pH, amount of sodium periodate, and amount of ethanol on aldehyde content of DCLGG was shown in Figure1. The amount of sodium periodate was defined as the percentage of the mass ratio of sodium periodate to dry cross-linked guar gum. The amount of ethanol was defined as the percentage of the mass ratio of ethanol to slurry.Figure 1
Effect of reaction time, reaction temperature, pH, amount of sodium periodate, and amount of ethanol on the aldehyde content of DCLGG.
(a)
Reaction conditions: reaction temperature = 40°C, amount of sodium periodate = 30%, amount of ethanol = 77%, and pH = 4 (b)
Reaction conditions: reaction time = 3 h, amount of sodium periodate = 30%, amount of ethanol = 77%, and pH = 4 (c)
Reaction conditions: reaction time = 3 h, reaction temperature = 40°C, amount of sodium periodate = 30%, and amount of ethanol = 77% (d)
Reaction conditions: reaction time = 3 h, reaction temperature = 40°C, pH = 4, and amount of ethanol = 77% (e)
Reaction conditions: reaction time = 3 h, reaction temperature = 40°C, pH = 4, and amount of sodium periodate = 30%From Figure1(a), the aldehyde content of DCLGG increased with increasing the reaction time when the reaction time was less than 3.0 h. The aldehyde content of DCLGG did not change basically with the increase of the reaction time when the reaction time was more than 3 h. The causes for this could be explained as follows. As the reaction time increased, the increase of the effective contact between the molecules of GG and molecules of sodium periodate promoted the oxidization reaction. However, the sodium periodate was depleted as the oxidization reaction proceeded. The oxidization reaction would not continue when the concentration of sodium periodate was reduced to a certain value. So the suitable reaction time was considered to be 3 h.The reaction temperature was varied from 30 to 50°C to examine the temperature effects. From Figure1(b), when the reaction temperature was less than 40°C, the aldehyde content of DCLGG increased with increasing the reaction temperature. When the reaction temperature was more than 40°C, however, the aldehyde content of DCLGG decreased with increasing the reaction temperature. The reason might be explained as follows: as the reaction temperature increased, the thermal motion of sodium periodate molecules was accelerated, which was in favor of the diffusion of sodium periodate into the particles. It resulted in the more hydroxyl groups on GG particles being oxidized. On the other hand, the elevated temperature would lead to the more side reaction of sodium periodate and the large expansion of the GG grains, which reduced the number of the holes on the GG grains. As a result, the reaction temperature influenced the oxidization. So, the suitable reaction temperature was considered to be 40°C.The pH was varied from 2 to 6 to examine the effects of the pH. From Figure1(c), when the pH was less than 4, the aldehyde content of DCLGG increased with increasing the pH. When the pH value was more than 4, however, the aldehyde content of DCLGG decreased with increasing the pH. The causes for this could be explained as follows: during the oxidization, sodium periodate was first obliged to be transformed into the periodic acid under the acid condition, and then the oxidization of CLGG was able to be carried out. Therefore, when the pH value was more than 4, it was not in favor of the transformation of sodium periodate into the periodic acid. This resulted in the efficiency of the oxidization to be lowered. But the degree of the acetal or hemiacetal cross-linking formation increased because the aldehyde group reacted with the hydroxyl group between DCLGG molecules or within DCLGG molecules when the pH of the oxidization was less than 4. So, the suitable pH was considered to be 4 in this system.The amount of sodium periodate was varied from 10% to 30% to examine the effects of sodium periodate. From Figure1(d), the aldehyde content of DCGG increased with the increase of the amount of sodium periodate. The effective collision was proportional to the concentration of reactants, and reaction rate was proportional to the collision frequency. When the amount of sodium periodate was very low, the collision frequency decreased, which led to a very low reaction rate. So, the amount of sodium periodate was selected to be 30% for considering the actual needs of DCGG.During sodium periodate oxidization, the action of ethanol as a solvent only kept GG in a granular form. The amount of ethanol was varied from 51% to 78% to examine the effects of ethanol at the fixed other parameters. From Figure1(e), the aldehyde content of DCLGG increased with the increase of the amount of ethanol. But the aldehyde content of DCLGG was changed slightly with the increase of the amount of ethanol. And the value, where the amount of ethanol reached 78%, was basically close to the maximum in this system. So, the amount of ethanol was selected to be 78%.


## 3.2. Optimization of Processing Parameters

### 3.2.1. Design and Results of Response Surface Test

The process parameters for preparing DCLGG were further optimized using the dialdehyde content as the response value by the Box-Behnken design, which was used to develop a correlation between the condition variables and the dialdehyde content. The factors and levels of the response surface test for DCLGG were shown in Table1. Accordingly, the design and results of the response surface test were shown in Table 2. The amount of sodium periodate was held at 30%.Table 1
Factors and levels of response surface test for DCLGG.
Factors and levels Reaction temperature (A)/°C Reaction time (B)/h pH (C) Amount of ethanol (D)/% - 1 35 2.5 3 61 0 40 3.0 4 68 1 45 3.5 5 77Table 2
Design and results of response surface test for DCLGG.
Test numbers A B C D Aldehyde content/% 1 45.00 3.50 4.00 71.00 25.12 2 40.00 3.00 4.00 71.00 27.5 3 40.00 3.50 4.00 63.00 25.08 4 45.00 2.50 4.00 71.00 22.39 5 35.00 3.00 5.00 71.00 23.56 6 35.00 3.00 4.00 78.00 25.12 7 45.00 3.00 4.00 78.00 27.61 8 45.00 3.00 3.00 71.00 20.51 9 35.00 3.00 4.00 63.00 24.82 10 40.00 3.50 5.00 71.00 23.36 11 45.00 3.00 5.00 71.00 23.97 12 35.00 3.50 4.00 71.00 25.09 13 40.00 3.50 4.00 78.00 25.49 14 40.00 3.00 4.00 71.00 27.5 15 40.00 2.50 4.00 63.00 19.36 16 40.00 2.50 3.00 71.00 18.5 17 40.00 3.00 5.00 63.00 19.82 18 45.00 3.00 4.00 63.00 22.82 19 40.00 3.00 4.00 71.00 27.5 20 40.00 3.50 3.00 71.00 19.59 21 40.00 3.00 3.00 78.00 21.01 22 40.00 3.00 5.00 78.00 26.43 23 40.00 2.50 4.00 78.00 25.02 24 40.00 3.00 4.00 71.00 27.5 25 40.00 3.00 4.00 71.00 27.5 26 40.00 3.00 3.00 63.00 20.14 27 35.00 3.00 3.00 71.00 21.66 28 35.00 2.50 4.00 71.00 22.39 29 40.00 2.50 5.00 71.00 18.72


### 3.2.2. Mathematical Model and Variance Analysis

By applying multiple regression analysis on the experimental data, the second-order response surface model for preparing DCLGG was as follows:(14)Y=27.4-0.068A+1.5B+1.14C+1.55D-0.93A2-2.8B2-4.41C2-1.13D2+0.0075AB+0.39AC+1.11AD+0.89BC-1.32BD+1.43CD,where Y is the predicted response, that is, the aldehyde content, and A, B, C, and D are the test variables such as the reaction temperature, reaction time, pH, and amount of ethanol, respectively.The analysis of the variance (ANOVA) was performed to check the significance of the fit of the second-order polynomial equation for the experimental data, and the results were given in Table3. From Table 3, the prob. level of the regression with a very low probability value (<0.0001) indicated that the model was highly significant. The goodness of fit of the model was checked by the determination coefficient (R2) of 99.03%. In this case, R2 value (0.9903) for the above equation indicated that the sample variation for DCLGG of 99.03% was attributed to the independent variables and only 0.97% of the total variation cannot be explained by the model. The adjusted determination coefficient (adj. R2=0.9805) was also satisfactory for confirming the significance of the model.Table 3
Variance analysis of response surface test.
Source Square sum Freedom degree Mean square F-ratio Prob. level Significance level Regression 247.69 14 17.69 101.59 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ A 0.055 1 0.055 0.31 0.5843 B 27.0 1 27.0 155.01 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ C 15.52 1 15.52 89.14 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ D 28.95 1 29.95 166.25 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ A 2 5.65 1 5.65 32.44 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ B 2 50.93 1 50.93 292.44 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ C 2 125.98 1 125.98 723.39 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ D 2 8.15 1 8.15 46.8 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ A B 0.00023 1 0.00023 0.00129 0.9718 A C 0.61 1 0.61 3.49 0.0827 A D 3.15 1 4.94 28.37 0.0011 B C 4.94 1 3.15 18.09 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ B D 6.94 1 6.94 39.86 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ C D 8.16 1 8.16 46.85 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ Residuals 2.44 14 0.17 Lack of fit 2.44 10 0.24 Pure error 0.000 4 0.000 Sum 10.75 28 E x t r e m e l y   ∗ ∗ significant difference at P≤0.001. Note:significant difference at P≤0.05.The probability level was used as a tool to check the significance of each of the coefficients. SmallerP value denoted the greater significance of the corresponding coefficient. From the variance analysis in Table 3, it was possible to identify factors affecting the relative importance of the aldehyde content. The order from the primary to secondary was the amount of ethanol, reaction time, pH, and reaction temperature in turn. The independent variable (B,C,D), squared variables (A2,B2,C2,D2), and interaction (BD,BC,CD) had a high significant effect. All the independent variables had a positive coefficient except for the variable (A). The negative signs of the independent variable (A), the BD interaction, and squared variables (A2,B2,C2,D2) revealed a reduction in the aldehyde content when these corresponding variables were increased. However, the independent variable (A) and interaction (AB,AC,AD) were not significant. So the equation discussed above was further simplified as (15)Y=2.74+1.5B+1.14C+1.55D-0.93A2-2.8B2-4.41C2-1.13D2+0.89BC-1.32BD+1.43CD.The optimal values of pH, amount of ethanol, reaction temperature, and time estimated in actual units were 4.1, 74.52%, 39.88°C, and 3.04 h, respectively, with the predicted aldehyde content of 28.1%. According to the realistic conditions, the pH, amount of ethanol, reaction temperature, and reaction time were adjusted to 4.0, 74.5%, 40°C, and 3.0 h, respectively.


### 3.2.3. Interaction of Variables

The response surfaces as the function of two variables at the center level of other variables were shown in Figures2, 3, and 4, respectively. The three-dimensional response surface plot was a 3D graphic representation of the regression equation showing the individual and cumulative effect of the variable and the mutual interaction between the variables.Figure 2
Mutual effect of amount of ethanol and reaction time at fixed pH of 4 and reaction temperature of 40°C.Figure 3
Mutual effect of amount of ethanol and pH at fixed reaction temperature of 40°C and reaction time of 3 h.Figure 4
Mutual effect of reaction time and pH at fixed reaction temperature of 40°C and amount of ethanol of 74.5%.From Figure2, the aldehyde content of DCLGG increased with increasing the amount of ethanol when the pH and reaction temperature were fixed at 4 and 40°C, respectively. But the influence of the reaction time on the aldehyde content of DCLGG was different from the amount of ethanol with increasing the reaction time. The aldehyde content of DCLGG was found to first increase with the increase of the reaction time from 2.5 to 3.0 and thereafter decreased with the further increase of the reaction time from 3.0 to 3.5.From Figure3, the response surface as the function of the amount of ethanol and pH was obviously different from the response surface as the function of the amount of ethanol and reaction time when the reaction temperature and reaction time were fixed at 40°C and 3 h, respectively. The aldehyde content of DCLGG was obviously influenced by the pH, compared with the amount of ethanol.From Figure4, the effect of the pH or reaction time on the aldehyde content of DCLGG displayed first the increase and then the decrease with increasing the pH or reaction time when the reaction temperature and amount of ethanol were fixed at 40°C and 74.5%, respectively. The response surface was like the parabolic surface.


### 3.2.4. Verification of Model

The parallel test was conducted three times under the above adjusted optimal parameters again. The mean experimental value for the aldehyde content of DCLGG was obtained to be 27.75% under these optimum conditions, which was 1.3% lower than the predicted value. It revealed the high accuracy of the model.


## 3.2.1. Design and Results of Response Surface Test

The process parameters for preparing DCLGG were further optimized using the dialdehyde content as the response value by the Box-Behnken design, which was used to develop a correlation between the condition variables and the dialdehyde content. The factors and levels of the response surface test for DCLGG were shown in Table1. Accordingly, the design and results of the response surface test were shown in Table 2. The amount of sodium periodate was held at 30%.Table 1
Factors and levels of response surface test for DCLGG.
Factors and levels Reaction temperature (A)/°C Reaction time (B)/h pH (C) Amount of ethanol (D)/% - 1 35 2.5 3 61 0 40 3.0 4 68 1 45 3.5 5 77Table 2
Design and results of response surface test for DCLGG.
Test numbers A B C D Aldehyde content/% 1 45.00 3.50 4.00 71.00 25.12 2 40.00 3.00 4.00 71.00 27.5 3 40.00 3.50 4.00 63.00 25.08 4 45.00 2.50 4.00 71.00 22.39 5 35.00 3.00 5.00 71.00 23.56 6 35.00 3.00 4.00 78.00 25.12 7 45.00 3.00 4.00 78.00 27.61 8 45.00 3.00 3.00 71.00 20.51 9 35.00 3.00 4.00 63.00 24.82 10 40.00 3.50 5.00 71.00 23.36 11 45.00 3.00 5.00 71.00 23.97 12 35.00 3.50 4.00 71.00 25.09 13 40.00 3.50 4.00 78.00 25.49 14 40.00 3.00 4.00 71.00 27.5 15 40.00 2.50 4.00 63.00 19.36 16 40.00 2.50 3.00 71.00 18.5 17 40.00 3.00 5.00 63.00 19.82 18 45.00 3.00 4.00 63.00 22.82 19 40.00 3.00 4.00 71.00 27.5 20 40.00 3.50 3.00 71.00 19.59 21 40.00 3.00 3.00 78.00 21.01 22 40.00 3.00 5.00 78.00 26.43 23 40.00 2.50 4.00 78.00 25.02 24 40.00 3.00 4.00 71.00 27.5 25 40.00 3.00 4.00 71.00 27.5 26 40.00 3.00 3.00 63.00 20.14 27 35.00 3.00 3.00 71.00 21.66 28 35.00 2.50 4.00 71.00 22.39 29 40.00 2.50 5.00 71.00 18.72


## 3.2.2. Mathematical Model and Variance Analysis

By applying multiple regression analysis on the experimental data, the second-order response surface model for preparing DCLGG was as follows:(14)Y=27.4-0.068A+1.5B+1.14C+1.55D-0.93A2-2.8B2-4.41C2-1.13D2+0.0075AB+0.39AC+1.11AD+0.89BC-1.32BD+1.43CD,where Y is the predicted response, that is, the aldehyde content, and A, B, C, and D are the test variables such as the reaction temperature, reaction time, pH, and amount of ethanol, respectively.The analysis of the variance (ANOVA) was performed to check the significance of the fit of the second-order polynomial equation for the experimental data, and the results were given in Table3. From Table 3, the prob. level of the regression with a very low probability value (<0.0001) indicated that the model was highly significant. The goodness of fit of the model was checked by the determination coefficient (R2) of 99.03%. In this case, R2 value (0.9903) for the above equation indicated that the sample variation for DCLGG of 99.03% was attributed to the independent variables and only 0.97% of the total variation cannot be explained by the model. The adjusted determination coefficient (adj. R2=0.9805) was also satisfactory for confirming the significance of the model.Table 3
Variance analysis of response surface test.
Source Square sum Freedom degree Mean square F-ratio Prob. level Significance level Regression 247.69 14 17.69 101.59 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ A 0.055 1 0.055 0.31 0.5843 B 27.0 1 27.0 155.01 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ C 15.52 1 15.52 89.14 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ D 28.95 1 29.95 166.25 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ A 2 5.65 1 5.65 32.44 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ B 2 50.93 1 50.93 292.44 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ C 2 125.98 1 125.98 723.39 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ D 2 8.15 1 8.15 46.8 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ A B 0.00023 1 0.00023 0.00129 0.9718 A C 0.61 1 0.61 3.49 0.0827 A D 3.15 1 4.94 28.37 0.0011 B C 4.94 1 3.15 18.09 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ B D 6.94 1 6.94 39.86 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ C D 8.16 1 8.16 46.85 <0.0001 ∗ ∗ Residuals 2.44 14 0.17 Lack of fit 2.44 10 0.24 Pure error 0.000 4 0.000 Sum 10.75 28 E x t r e m e l y   ∗ ∗ significant difference at P≤0.001. Note:significant difference at P≤0.05.The probability level was used as a tool to check the significance of each of the coefficients. SmallerP value denoted the greater significance of the corresponding coefficient. From the variance analysis in Table 3, it was possible to identify factors affecting the relative importance of the aldehyde content. The order from the primary to secondary was the amount of ethanol, reaction time, pH, and reaction temperature in turn. The independent variable (B,C,D), squared variables (A2,B2,C2,D2), and interaction (BD,BC,CD) had a high significant effect. All the independent variables had a positive coefficient except for the variable (A). The negative signs of the independent variable (A), the BD interaction, and squared variables (A2,B2,C2,D2) revealed a reduction in the aldehyde content when these corresponding variables were increased. However, the independent variable (A) and interaction (AB,AC,AD) were not significant. So the equation discussed above was further simplified as (15)Y=2.74+1.5B+1.14C+1.55D-0.93A2-2.8B2-4.41C2-1.13D2+0.89BC-1.32BD+1.43CD.The optimal values of pH, amount of ethanol, reaction temperature, and time estimated in actual units were 4.1, 74.52%, 39.88°C, and 3.04 h, respectively, with the predicted aldehyde content of 28.1%. According to the realistic conditions, the pH, amount of ethanol, reaction temperature, and reaction time were adjusted to 4.0, 74.5%, 40°C, and 3.0 h, respectively.


## 3.2.3. Interaction of Variables

The response surfaces as the function of two variables at the center level of other variables were shown in Figures2, 3, and 4, respectively. The three-dimensional response surface plot was a 3D graphic representation of the regression equation showing the individual and cumulative effect of the variable and the mutual interaction between the variables.Figure 2
Mutual effect of amount of ethanol and reaction time at fixed pH of 4 and reaction temperature of 40°C.Figure 3
Mutual effect of amount of ethanol and pH at fixed reaction temperature of 40°C and reaction time of 3 h.Figure 4
Mutual effect of reaction time and pH at fixed reaction temperature of 40°C and amount of ethanol of 74.5%.From Figure2, the aldehyde content of DCLGG increased with increasing the amount of ethanol when the pH and reaction temperature were fixed at 4 and 40°C, respectively. But the influence of the reaction time on the aldehyde content of DCLGG was different from the amount of ethanol with increasing the reaction time. The aldehyde content of DCLGG was found to first increase with the increase of the reaction time from 2.5 to 3.0 and thereafter decreased with the further increase of the reaction time from 3.0 to 3.5.From Figure3, the response surface as the function of the amount of ethanol and pH was obviously different from the response surface as the function of the amount of ethanol and reaction time when the reaction temperature and reaction time were fixed at 40°C and 3 h, respectively. The aldehyde content of DCLGG was obviously influenced by the pH, compared with the amount of ethanol.From Figure4, the effect of the pH or reaction time on the aldehyde content of DCLGG displayed first the increase and then the decrease with increasing the pH or reaction time when the reaction temperature and amount of ethanol were fixed at 40°C and 74.5%, respectively. The response surface was like the parabolic surface.


## 3.2.4. Verification of Model

The parallel test was conducted three times under the above adjusted optimal parameters again. The mean experimental value for the aldehyde content of DCLGG was obtained to be 27.75% under these optimum conditions, which was 1.3% lower than the predicted value. It revealed the high accuracy of the model.


## 3.3. Relationship between Sedimentation Volume and Phosphorus Content

The relationship of sedimentation volume and phosphorus content for CLGG was shown in Table4. From Table 4, the sedimentation volume decreased with increasing the phosphorus content. The smaller the sedimentation volume was, the bigger the cross-linking degree was. It proved that the cross-linking degree of GG was expressed indirectly by the sedimentation volume.Table 4
The relationship between sedimentation volume and phosphorus content for CLGG.
Samples Phosphorus content/% CLGG (sedimentation volume = 3.5 mL) 0.0163 CLGG (sedimentation volume = 2.4 mL) 0.0240 CLGG (sedimentation volume = 1.3 mL) 0.0495


## 3.4. Effect of Cross-Linking and Oxidation on Freeze-Thaw Stability and Swelling Power

The freeze-thaw stability and swelling power of GG, CLGG (sedimentation volume = 2.4 mL), DGG (aldehyde content = 24.7%), and DCLGG (aldehyde content = 24.7%; sedimentation volume = 2.4 mL) were shown in Table5. The high separated water percentage meant the poor freeze-thaw stability. When the paste of GG, CLGG, DGG, and DCLGG was frozen, the phase separation occurred with the formation of the ice crystals. The extent of the phase separation increased with increasing the additional freeze-thaw cycles. From Table 5, the cross-linking and oxidization increased the freeze-thaw stability of GG. The cross-linking only increased the swelling power of GG, which improved dramatically its release effect. However, the oxidization decreased the swelling power of GG. It resulted in the fact that the swelling power of DCLGG was between the swelling power of CLGG and the swelling power of DGG. The cross-linking made up the reduction of the swelling power of GG owing to the oxidization.Table 5
Effect of cross-linking and oxidation on freeze-thaw stability and swelling power of GG.
Samples Separated water percentage/% Swelling power/% GG 94.7 39.0 CLGG 82.9 51.3 DGG 84.8 21.6 DCLGG 80.6 34.1


## 3.5. Effect of Cross-Linking and Oxidation on Cold and Hot Viscosity Stability

The cold viscosity stability and hot viscosity stability of GG, CLGG (sedimentation volume = 2.4 mL), DGG (aldehyde content = 24.7%), and DCLGG (aldehyde content = 24.7%; sedimentation volume = 2.4 mL) were shown in Table6. From Table 6, the cross-linking and oxidation reduced the viscosity of GG. It suggested that the paste of the derivatives had the high solid content. After GG was cross-linked or oxidized, the fluctuation ratios of the cold viscosity and hot viscosity all decreased. The fluctuation ratio of the hot viscosity was less than that of the cold viscosity. The magnitude of the cold viscosity and hot viscosity fluctuation ratios from big to small in order was GG, DGG, DCLGG, and CLGG. It suggested that the change of the hot viscosity fluctuation was in accordance with the cold viscosity fluctuation. The cross-linking and diol oxidation reduced the viscosity of GG. The situation was very helpful to form a coherent film on the surface of the substrate under the prevailing conditions. And the low viscosity was in favor of the drug coating.Table 6
Effect of cross-linking and oxidation on cold and hot viscosity stability of GG.
Samples Viscosity/mPa·s Cold viscosity stability/% Hot viscosity stability/% GG 428.0 93.3 91.3 CLGG 246.0 56.1 48.6 DGG 40.2 84.4 87.3 DCLGG 4.1 44.5 45.7


## 3.6. Effect of Cross-Linking and Oxidation on FTIR of GG

FTIR spectra of GG, CLGG (sedimentation volume = 2.4 mL), and DCLGG (aldehyde content = 24.7%; sedimentation volume = 2.4 mL) were shown in Figure5. From Figure 5, the absorption peaks of GG, CLGG, and DCLGG at the wave number of 3400 cm−1 were due to the stretching vibration of the O-H groups. The peak intensity of the O-H groups in the FTIR curves of CLGG and DCLGG was obviously different from the intensity in the FTIR curves of GG. The intensity of the O-H groups in the FTIR curves of CLGG and DCLGG was less than that of GG. However, the intensity of the O-H groups of CLGG was almost the same as that of DCLGG. It proved that the cross-linking obviously reduced the numbers of the O-H groups in GG molecules. The oxidization could not obviously change the intensity of the O-H groups of CLGG. The absorption peak of GG, CLGG, and DCLGG at the wave number of 2920 cm−1 belonged to the stretching vibration of the C-H bond. The peak intensity of the C-H bond of CLGG and DCLGG was obviously less than that of GG owing to the P=O bond. The absorption peak of DCLGG at the wave number of 1760 cm−1 was attributed to the characteristic peak of the C=O bond. It proved that the aldehyde group was successfully introduced into the molecules of GG owing to the oxidization. However, there was no difference between GG and CLGG except for the peak intensity. It suggested that the P-O-C bond in the molecules of CLGG was not determined by the infrared spectroscopy.Figure 5
IR spectra of GG, CLGG, and DCLGG.


## 3.7. DSC and TGA Analysis

The DSC and TGA curves of GG, CLGG (sedimentation volume = 2.4 mL), and DCLGG (aldehyde content = 24.7%; sedimentation volume = 2.4 mL) were shown in Figure6. According to Figure 6, after GG was modified by the cross-linking or oxidization, its onset temperature, peak temperature, end temperature, melting enthalpy, and thermal stability all were changed. The specific parameters calculated from the above-mentioned figures were listed in Tables 7 and 8. The thermogravimetric analysis of GG, CLGG, and DCLGG essentially revealed two distinct zones of the mass loss. The initial mass loss occurred due to the moisture presented in the samples. The second step represented the degradation of the polymer backbone.Table 7
Onset temperature, peak temperature, end temperature, and melting enthalpy.
Sample Onset temperature/°C Peak temperature/°C End temperature/°C Melting enthalpy/J·g−1 GG 52.6 104.6 162.33 367.8 CLGG 61.1 112.1 170.84 318.2 DCLGG 55.0 115.3 171.36 334.7Table 8
Onset decomposition temperature, end decomposition temperature, and mass loss rate.
Sample Onset End Rate of mass loss/% decomposition decomposition temperature/°C temperature/°C GG 279.8 327.1 69.0 CLGG 275.7 316.5 62.4 DCLGG 276.9 322.9 60.4Figure 6
DSC (a) and TGA (b) curves of GG, CLGG, and DCLGG.
(a) (b)The DSC curves of the polymers showed their specific endothermic peaks and melted enthalpy, which were helpful in determining the fitness of the polymers with the active compounds. From Table7, the onset temperature, peak temperature, and end temperature of CLGG or DCLGG were more than those of GG. The melting enthalpy of CLGG or DCLGG was less than that of GG. In particular, the peak temperature and end temperature of DCLGG were more than those of CLGG. The cross-liking reduced the melting enthalpy of GG. However, the oxidization increased the melting enthalpy of CLGG. In the meantime, the cross-linking increased the onset temperature of GG. But the oxidization reduced the onset temperature of CLGG.From Table8, the onset decomposition temperature, end decomposition temperature, and rate of mass loss of GG were reduced by the cross-linking or the oxidization. However, the onset decomposition temperature and end decomposition temperature of CLGG were increased by the oxidization. The data of mass loss rate proved that the thermal stability of GG was increased by the cross-linking or the oxidization.


## 3.8. Morphology Analysis

The polarizing microscope photos of GG, CLGG (sedimentation volume = 2.4 mL), and DCLGG (aldehyde content = 24.7%; sedimentation volume = 2.4 mL) were shown in Figure7. From Figure 7, there was no Maltese cross on the surface of the GG particles. The refraction of the polarized light on GG particles belonged to a single refraction. The cross-linking did not change obviously the morphology of GG particles, which displayed a linear shape. The morphology of the DCLGG particles, however, was different from that of GG, and most of the DCLGG particles were of a block shape. It suggested that the particles of GG and CLGG did swell owing to the oxidization. The appearance and size of GG granules were influenced by the aldehyde oxidization. It proved that the sodium periodate oxidization might be carried out not only on the surface of GG particles but also in its interior.Figure 7
Polarizing microscope photos of GG (a), CLGG (b), and DCLGG (c).
(a) (b) (c)


## 3.9. Binding of L-Asparagine

The binding curve of L-asparagine on DCLGG ((a) aldehyde content = 14.7%; (b) aldehyde content = 26.2%) granules was shown in Figure8. The binding capacity of DCLGG was determined by the improved Kjeldahl method. From Figure 8, the adsorption capacity of DCLGG with aldehyde content of 26.2% was more than that of DCLGG with aldehyde content of 14.7%. The adsorption capacity of DCLGG increased with the increase in the adsorption time when the adsorption time was less than 4 h. For the adsorption curve of L-asparagine on DCLGG with aldehyde content of 26.2%, the adsorption capacity of DCLGG was not changed basically with increasing the adsorption time when the adsorption time was more than 5 h. The maximum adsorption capacity of L-asparagine on DCLGG with aldehyde content of 26.2% reached 21.9 mg/g, which is obviously greater than that of the anticancer drug called doxorubicin on the dialdehyde starch nanoparticle carriers [45]. Accordingly, the maximum adsorption capacity of L-asparagine on DCLGG with aldehyde content of 14.7% was only 15.3 mg/g. The above results suggested that L-asparagine was chemically bound well by DCLGG.Figure 8
Adsorption curve of L-asparagine on DCLGG.


## 4. Conclusions

The importance order of the oxidization of cross-linking guar gum from the primary to the secondary was the amount of ethanol, reaction time, pH, and reaction temperature. The effect of the interaction between the reaction time and pH, reaction time and amount of ethanol, and amount of ethanol and pH on the aldehyde content of dialdehyde cross-linking guar gum was extremely significant. The best technological conditions for preparing dialdehyde cross-linked guar gum were as follows: reaction temperature of 40°C, reaction time of 3.0 h, pH of 4.0, and amount of ethanol of 74.5%. The optimum oxidization conditions shown in this study can be further exploited to prepare the industrial products by providing much more opportunity for the multiapplications of DCLGG. The cross-linking increased the freeze-thaw stability, swelling power, and cold viscosity stability and hot viscosity stability of GG. The dialdehyde oxidization also increased the freeze-thaw stability and cold viscosity stability and hot viscosity stability of GG but decreased the swelling power of GG. The thermal stability of GG was increased from the cross-linking or the oxidization. The cross-linking and the oxidization could obviously change the melting process of GG. The refraction of the polarized light on GG particles belonged to a single refraction. L-asparagine could be chemically bound by DCLGG. The results showed that dialdehyde cross-linked guar gum as a novel functional material would be well applied for many fields.



---

*Source: 6482461-2016-12-01.xml*