# Effect of Propofol Intravenous Anesthesia Combined with Press-Needle Therapy on Analgesic Effect during Painless Abortion

Authors: Xia Zhu; Xueming He; Baojun Fan; Jing Liu; Shuqing Wu; Hongli Wang; Chunwei Chen
Journal: Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

Objective. To discover the effect of propofol intravenous anesthesia along with press-needle therapy on analgesic effect during painless abortion. Methods. A total of 128 cases who experienced painless abortion in our hospital from January 2019 to August 2021 were recruited as the research subjects. They were categorized into control and observation groups through the haphazard number table approach, with 64 patients in each group. Propofol intravenous anesthesia was given to the control group, and the observation group was given combined anesthesia with press-needle on this basis. Ramsay score, hemodynamic indexes, operation-related indexes, and postoperative recovery were studied between the two groups before anesthesia (T0), at the time of uterine aspiration (T1), promptly following the operation (T2), and at the recovery time of directional force (T3). The stress state and the level of pain mediators in the two groups of sufferers were observed at each time period, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) was employed to assess the degree of postoperative uterine contraction pain. Results. Ramsay score at T1 and T2 time points in observation group was lesser than that in control group (P<0.05). There existed no meaningful discrepancies in operation time and recovery time between both groups (P>0.05). The total dosage of propofol in the observation group was lesser compared to that in the control group, and the recovery time of directional force was much shorter compared to that in the control group (P<0.05). There existed no meaningful discrepancies in perioperative diastolic blood pressure (DBP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and heart rate (HR) between both groups (P>0.05). The levels of norepinephrine (NE), cortisol (Cor), glucose (GLU) and substance P (SP), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HT) in the observation group were lesser than those in the control group immediately after surgery and 24 hours following the operation (P<0.05). There existed no meaningful discrepancies in vaginal bleeding time, endometrial thickness 3 weeks after operation, and time to start menstruating between both groups (P>0.05). The score of VAS for the observation group was lesser than that of the control group at 10 min and 30 min after operation (P<0.05). There existed no substantial discrepancy in the incidence of negative reactions between both groups (P>0.05). Conclusion. Propofol intravenous anesthesia combined with press-needle therapy can ameliorate the analgesic impacts during painless abortion, reduce postoperative uterine contraction pain, inhibit the release of postoperative pain mediators, and improve the stress state of the body.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Abortion surgery refers to the use of surgical methods to terminate a pregnancy, that is, “artificial” termination of pregnancy [1]. Abortion is one of the most common methods of pregnancy termination and a remedy for unsuccessful contraception. Very recently, painless abortion has been widely used in clinical practice. Clinically, it is generally believed that the use of appropriate anesthetic drugs during surgery can not only achieve better anesthesia effect and relieve patients’ intraoperative and postoperative pain but also ensure the smooth operation [2, 3]. Propofol is a regularly implemented anesthetic drug in abortion operation. It has the advantages of fast onset and short half-life. However, it has been reported that its anesthetic effect is not ideal [4, 5]. Auricular acupoint press-needle therapy is a microneedle therapy guided by the holographic theory of auricular acupoints. It is a method to bury the microneedle into the auricular acupoint and stimulate the acupoint to achieve the therapeutic effect. The press-needle is an intradermal needle, characterized by light and shallow. The needle tip penetrates the superficial skin, which not only has the effect of acupuncture but also can avoid the phenomenon of complicated needling operation [6, 7]. In this study, the subcortical, Shenmen, and sympathetic acupoints in the ear were selected. Among them, the subcortical acupoint can regulate the excitation and inhibition of the cerebral cortex, the Shenmen acupoint can relieve pain and calm the mind, and the sympathetic acupoint has the functions of dredging Qi, promoting blood circulation, and relieving pain [8]. Ashi acupoint can regulate Qi and blood and reduce the influence caused by blood stasis, and the combination of multiple acupoints can adjust the pain threshold of the central nervous system and analgesic and antispasmodic effects [9, 10]. However, the application value of this analgesic method combined with propofol anesthesia in painless abortion is still in the exploratory stage. Therefore, the target of the present exploration is to discover the influence of propofol intravenous anesthesia combined with press-needle therapy on analgesic effect during painless abortion and to present reference for the choice of anesthesia methods for patients.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Clinical Data

A total of 128 patients who experienced painless abortion in our hospital from January 2019 to August 2021 were recruited as the research targets, and they were categorized into the observation and control groups through the haphazard number table approach, with 64 cases in each group. There existed no meaningful discrepancy in general outcomes between both groups (P>0.05), as shown in Table 1.Table 1
Comparison of the general outcomes for the two groups of patients.
ItemObservation group (n=64)Control group (n=64)χ2/t valueP valueAge (years)28.15±3.0228.71±3.151.0270.307Body mass index (kg/m2)21.73±1.8521.59±1.730.4420.659ASA grading (numbers)Grade I37390.1300.719Grade II2725Gestational age (weeks)6.09±1.125.94±1.160.7440.458Gravidity (frequencies)1.83±0.211.76±0.231.7980.075Parity (frequencies)1.02±0.151.05±0.131.2090.229Note: ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists [11].


### 2.2. The Criteria of Inclusion

(1)
Cases who underwent painless abortion(2)
The present research was confirmed through the Ethics Committee of our hospital, and the contributors presented the letter of satisfaction and signed the consent letter(3)
Patients with ASA grade of I-II


### 2.3. The Criteria of Exclusion

(1)
Cases with hemorrhagic diseases(2)
Cases with skin diseases such as skin damage of outer ear and eczema(3)
Cases with infectious diseases(4)
Cases with a history of chronic pain and analgesic drug dependence(5)
Cases combined with kidney and liver and other important organ dysfunction(6)
Cases with a history of alcohol or drug abuse(7)
Cases with mental illness(8)
Cases with other uterine diseases(9)
Those who are allergic to narcotics


### 2.4. Methods

Patients in both groups were deprived of water for 2 hours and fasted for 8 hours before surgery. After the bladder was emptied, venous channels were established, and vital signs were detected by ECG monitoring. The control group was given intravenous anesthesia with propofol (Xi’an Libang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., batch number: H19990282), using manual intravenous bolus of propofol, the induction dose was 2.5 mg/kg, and an additional 30 mg of propofol was added when the eyelash reflex disappeared.The observation group was processed with press-needle therapy in accordance with the control group, and bilateral uterine, pelvic, endocrine, subcortical, Shenmen, sympathetic, and Ashi acupoints were selected according to the positioning standard of “Nomenclature and location of auricular points GBT 13734-2008.” The ear skin was disinfected with 75% ethanol, the auricle was fixed with the left thumb and index finger, the back of the ear at the acupuncture site was supported by the middle finger, the annular needle handle of sterile press-needle (Hua Tuo brand, Batch No. 20182270591, specification: 0.22 mm∗1.5 mm) was taken with tweezers with the right hand, and the tape was removed, and it was inserted into the acupoint. After the acupuncture was fixed, the acupoints were pressed with the thumb abdomen. When pressing, the pressure was moderate, from light to heavy, and one is tight and one is loose, with the patient having acid, numbness, and swelling pain as the appropriate degree. When pressing, if the patient did not feel comfortable, the operation should be stopped immediately, with 60~90 times/min, and each acupoint was lasted for 20~30s. It should be noted that the press-needle treatment should be avoided for patients with skin allergy and hemorrhagic diseases, and at the same time, the red and swollen and purulent parts of the ear skin should be avoided. During treatment, routine disinfection of needles, tweezers, and the patient’s auricular points should be performed. During operation, the patient should be informed to keep the auricle clean and dry and remove needles immediately if redness occurs.


### 2.5. Observation Indicators

#### 2.5.1. Analgesic Influence

Ramsay score was implemented to appraise the analgesic effect of patients before anesthesia (T0), at the time of uterine aspiration (T1), immediately after surgery (T2), and at the time of directional force recovery (T3) [12]. One point indicated fidgety; 2 points indicated quiet, awake, and cooperative; 3 points indicated drowsiness and quick responses to commands; 4 points indicated light sleep state and can be awakened quickly; 5 points indicated falling asleep and unresponsive to calls; 6 points indicated deep sleep and no response to calls.


#### 2.5.2. Surgery-Related Indicators

The operation time, recovery time, total dosage of propofol, and recovery time of directional force were compared between the two groups.


#### 2.5.3. Hemodynamic Indicators

Philips MT50 monitor was used for detecting systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate (HR) of patients at T0, T1, T2, and T3 time points.


#### 2.5.4. Stress Indicators

5 ml of venous blood was recruited from cases prior to surgery, immediately following the surgery and 24 hours after surgery, centrifuged at a rate of 3000 r/min, serum was separated, and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to detect norepinephrine (NE) level; cortisol (Cor) levels were detected by radioimmunoassay. Glucose (GLU) level was measured by glucokinase method.


#### 2.5.5. Pain Mediators

Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), serum substance P (SP), and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) levels were discerned through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) before surgery, immediately following the surgery, and 24 hours after surgery. The kit was provided by Shenzhen Jingmei Biological Engineering Co., Ltd.


#### 2.5.6. Postoperative Recovery

The vaginal bleeding time, endometrial thickness 3 weeks after operation, and time to start menstruating were compared between the two groups. The endometrial thickness was examined by color Doppler ultrasound diagnostic apparatus of GE Company of the United States.


#### 2.5.7. Postoperative Uterine Contraction Pain

The visual analogue scale (VAS) was employed to assess the postoperative uterine contraction pain of patients [13]. A scale with a length of 10 cm was used for evaluation. Patients selected a number on the scale to represent their own pain sensation, with the score ranging from 0 to 10 points. The greater the score, the more potent the pain sensation of patients.


#### 2.5.8. Adverse Reactions

The incidence of anesthesia-related adverse reactions, for instance, nausea and vomiting, body movement, and respiratory depression, were analyzed in both groups.


### 2.6. Statistical Processing

SPSS22.0 computer program was employed to evaluate the outcomes, count achievements were presented as percentage (%), and discrepancies between groups were studied throughχ2 analysis; assessment outcomes were presented as x¯±s after normality test, and discrepancies between groups were studied through t analysis. P<0.05 demonstrated that the discrepancy was statistically meaningful.


## 2.1. Clinical Data

A total of 128 patients who experienced painless abortion in our hospital from January 2019 to August 2021 were recruited as the research targets, and they were categorized into the observation and control groups through the haphazard number table approach, with 64 cases in each group. There existed no meaningful discrepancy in general outcomes between both groups (P>0.05), as shown in Table 1.Table 1
Comparison of the general outcomes for the two groups of patients.
ItemObservation group (n=64)Control group (n=64)χ2/t valueP valueAge (years)28.15±3.0228.71±3.151.0270.307Body mass index (kg/m2)21.73±1.8521.59±1.730.4420.659ASA grading (numbers)Grade I37390.1300.719Grade II2725Gestational age (weeks)6.09±1.125.94±1.160.7440.458Gravidity (frequencies)1.83±0.211.76±0.231.7980.075Parity (frequencies)1.02±0.151.05±0.131.2090.229Note: ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists [11].


## 2.2. The Criteria of Inclusion

(1)
Cases who underwent painless abortion(2)
The present research was confirmed through the Ethics Committee of our hospital, and the contributors presented the letter of satisfaction and signed the consent letter(3)
Patients with ASA grade of I-II


## 2.3. The Criteria of Exclusion

(1)
Cases with hemorrhagic diseases(2)
Cases with skin diseases such as skin damage of outer ear and eczema(3)
Cases with infectious diseases(4)
Cases with a history of chronic pain and analgesic drug dependence(5)
Cases combined with kidney and liver and other important organ dysfunction(6)
Cases with a history of alcohol or drug abuse(7)
Cases with mental illness(8)
Cases with other uterine diseases(9)
Those who are allergic to narcotics


## 2.4. Methods

Patients in both groups were deprived of water for 2 hours and fasted for 8 hours before surgery. After the bladder was emptied, venous channels were established, and vital signs were detected by ECG monitoring. The control group was given intravenous anesthesia with propofol (Xi’an Libang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., batch number: H19990282), using manual intravenous bolus of propofol, the induction dose was 2.5 mg/kg, and an additional 30 mg of propofol was added when the eyelash reflex disappeared.The observation group was processed with press-needle therapy in accordance with the control group, and bilateral uterine, pelvic, endocrine, subcortical, Shenmen, sympathetic, and Ashi acupoints were selected according to the positioning standard of “Nomenclature and location of auricular points GBT 13734-2008.” The ear skin was disinfected with 75% ethanol, the auricle was fixed with the left thumb and index finger, the back of the ear at the acupuncture site was supported by the middle finger, the annular needle handle of sterile press-needle (Hua Tuo brand, Batch No. 20182270591, specification: 0.22 mm∗1.5 mm) was taken with tweezers with the right hand, and the tape was removed, and it was inserted into the acupoint. After the acupuncture was fixed, the acupoints were pressed with the thumb abdomen. When pressing, the pressure was moderate, from light to heavy, and one is tight and one is loose, with the patient having acid, numbness, and swelling pain as the appropriate degree. When pressing, if the patient did not feel comfortable, the operation should be stopped immediately, with 60~90 times/min, and each acupoint was lasted for 20~30s. It should be noted that the press-needle treatment should be avoided for patients with skin allergy and hemorrhagic diseases, and at the same time, the red and swollen and purulent parts of the ear skin should be avoided. During treatment, routine disinfection of needles, tweezers, and the patient’s auricular points should be performed. During operation, the patient should be informed to keep the auricle clean and dry and remove needles immediately if redness occurs.


## 2.5. Observation Indicators

### 2.5.1. Analgesic Influence

Ramsay score was implemented to appraise the analgesic effect of patients before anesthesia (T0), at the time of uterine aspiration (T1), immediately after surgery (T2), and at the time of directional force recovery (T3) [12]. One point indicated fidgety; 2 points indicated quiet, awake, and cooperative; 3 points indicated drowsiness and quick responses to commands; 4 points indicated light sleep state and can be awakened quickly; 5 points indicated falling asleep and unresponsive to calls; 6 points indicated deep sleep and no response to calls.


### 2.5.2. Surgery-Related Indicators

The operation time, recovery time, total dosage of propofol, and recovery time of directional force were compared between the two groups.


### 2.5.3. Hemodynamic Indicators

Philips MT50 monitor was used for detecting systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate (HR) of patients at T0, T1, T2, and T3 time points.


### 2.5.4. Stress Indicators

5 ml of venous blood was recruited from cases prior to surgery, immediately following the surgery and 24 hours after surgery, centrifuged at a rate of 3000 r/min, serum was separated, and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to detect norepinephrine (NE) level; cortisol (Cor) levels were detected by radioimmunoassay. Glucose (GLU) level was measured by glucokinase method.


### 2.5.5. Pain Mediators

Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), serum substance P (SP), and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) levels were discerned through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) before surgery, immediately following the surgery, and 24 hours after surgery. The kit was provided by Shenzhen Jingmei Biological Engineering Co., Ltd.


### 2.5.6. Postoperative Recovery

The vaginal bleeding time, endometrial thickness 3 weeks after operation, and time to start menstruating were compared between the two groups. The endometrial thickness was examined by color Doppler ultrasound diagnostic apparatus of GE Company of the United States.


### 2.5.7. Postoperative Uterine Contraction Pain

The visual analogue scale (VAS) was employed to assess the postoperative uterine contraction pain of patients [13]. A scale with a length of 10 cm was used for evaluation. Patients selected a number on the scale to represent their own pain sensation, with the score ranging from 0 to 10 points. The greater the score, the more potent the pain sensation of patients.


### 2.5.8. Adverse Reactions

The incidence of anesthesia-related adverse reactions, for instance, nausea and vomiting, body movement, and respiratory depression, were analyzed in both groups.


## 2.5.1. Analgesic Influence

Ramsay score was implemented to appraise the analgesic effect of patients before anesthesia (T0), at the time of uterine aspiration (T1), immediately after surgery (T2), and at the time of directional force recovery (T3) [12]. One point indicated fidgety; 2 points indicated quiet, awake, and cooperative; 3 points indicated drowsiness and quick responses to commands; 4 points indicated light sleep state and can be awakened quickly; 5 points indicated falling asleep and unresponsive to calls; 6 points indicated deep sleep and no response to calls.


## 2.5.2. Surgery-Related Indicators

The operation time, recovery time, total dosage of propofol, and recovery time of directional force were compared between the two groups.


## 2.5.3. Hemodynamic Indicators

Philips MT50 monitor was used for detecting systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate (HR) of patients at T0, T1, T2, and T3 time points.


## 2.5.4. Stress Indicators

5 ml of venous blood was recruited from cases prior to surgery, immediately following the surgery and 24 hours after surgery, centrifuged at a rate of 3000 r/min, serum was separated, and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to detect norepinephrine (NE) level; cortisol (Cor) levels were detected by radioimmunoassay. Glucose (GLU) level was measured by glucokinase method.


## 2.5.5. Pain Mediators

Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), serum substance P (SP), and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) levels were discerned through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) before surgery, immediately following the surgery, and 24 hours after surgery. The kit was provided by Shenzhen Jingmei Biological Engineering Co., Ltd.


## 2.5.6. Postoperative Recovery

The vaginal bleeding time, endometrial thickness 3 weeks after operation, and time to start menstruating were compared between the two groups. The endometrial thickness was examined by color Doppler ultrasound diagnostic apparatus of GE Company of the United States.


## 2.5.7. Postoperative Uterine Contraction Pain

The visual analogue scale (VAS) was employed to assess the postoperative uterine contraction pain of patients [13]. A scale with a length of 10 cm was used for evaluation. Patients selected a number on the scale to represent their own pain sensation, with the score ranging from 0 to 10 points. The greater the score, the more potent the pain sensation of patients.


## 2.5.8. Adverse Reactions

The incidence of anesthesia-related adverse reactions, for instance, nausea and vomiting, body movement, and respiratory depression, were analyzed in both groups.


## 2.6. Statistical Processing

SPSS22.0 computer program was employed to evaluate the outcomes, count achievements were presented as percentage (%), and discrepancies between groups were studied throughχ2 analysis; assessment outcomes were presented as x¯±s after normality test, and discrepancies between groups were studied through t analysis. P<0.05 demonstrated that the discrepancy was statistically meaningful.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Comparison of Analgesic Influences between Both Groups

The Ramsay scores in the observation group at T1 and T2 time points were lesser than those in the control group (P<0.05), as demonstrated in Figure 1.Figure 1
Comparison of analgesic influences between both groups (note:∗ indicated P<0.05 when compared to the observation group).


### 3.2. Comparison of Surgery-Related Indicators between Both Groups

There were no substantial differences in operation time and recovery time between both groups (P>0.05). The total dosage of propofol in the observation group was lesser compared to that in the control group, and the recovery time of directional force was shorter than that in the control group (P<0.05), as demonstrated in Figure 2.Figure 2
Comparison of surgery-related indicators between both groups (note:∗ indicated P<0.05 when compared to the observation group).


### 3.3. Changes in Hemodynamic Indexes in Both Groups

There existed no meaningful discrepancy in perioperative SBP, DBP, and HR between both groups (P>0.05), as demonstrated in Figure 3.Figure 3
Modifications in hemodynamic indexes in the two groups.


### 3.4. Comparison of Stress Indicators between Both Groups

There existed no meaningful discrepancy in the levels of NE, Cor, and GLU before the operation between both groups (P>0.05); the levels of NE, GLU, and Cor in the observation group promptly following the surgery and 24 hours after the operation were lesser than those in the control group (P<0.05), as demonstrated in Figure 4.Figure 4
Comparison of stress indicators between both groups (note:∗ indicated P<0.05 when compared with the observation group).


### 3.5. Comparison of Pain Mediators between Both Groups

There existed no meaningful discrepancy in the levels of SP, PGE2, and 5-HT before operation between both groups (P>0.05); the levels of SP, PGE2, and 5-HT in the observation group promptly following the surgery and 24 hours following the surgery were lesser than those in the control group (P<0.05), as demonstrated in Figure 5.Figure 5
Comparison of pain mediators between both groups (note:∗ indicated P<0.05 when compared to the observation group).


### 3.6. Comparison of Postoperative Recovery between Both Groups

There existed no meaningful discrepancy in vaginal bleeding time, endometrial thickness 3 weeks after operation, and time to start menstruating between both groups (P>0.05), as demonstrated in Figure 6.Figure 6
Comparison of postoperative recovery between both groups.


### 3.7. Comparison of Postoperative Uterine Contraction Pain between Both Groups

The VAS score of the observation group at 10 min and 30 min following the surgery was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05), as demonstrated in Figure 7.Figure 7
Comparison of postoperative VAS scores between both groups (note:∗ indicated P<0.05 when compared to the observation group).


### 3.8. Comparison of the Incidence of Anesthesia-Related Adverse Reactions between the Two Groups

There was no significant difference in the incidence of negative reactions between both groups (P>0.05), as demonstrated in Table 2.Table 2
Comparison of the incidence of anesthesia-related negative reactions between both groups (cases, %).
GroupnBody movementRespiratory depressionBradycardiaNausea and vomitingOverall incidenceObservation group6410126.25Control group64312314.06χ22.141P0.143


## 3.1. Comparison of Analgesic Influences between Both Groups

The Ramsay scores in the observation group at T1 and T2 time points were lesser than those in the control group (P<0.05), as demonstrated in Figure 1.Figure 1
Comparison of analgesic influences between both groups (note:∗ indicated P<0.05 when compared to the observation group).


## 3.2. Comparison of Surgery-Related Indicators between Both Groups

There were no substantial differences in operation time and recovery time between both groups (P>0.05). The total dosage of propofol in the observation group was lesser compared to that in the control group, and the recovery time of directional force was shorter than that in the control group (P<0.05), as demonstrated in Figure 2.Figure 2
Comparison of surgery-related indicators between both groups (note:∗ indicated P<0.05 when compared to the observation group).


## 3.3. Changes in Hemodynamic Indexes in Both Groups

There existed no meaningful discrepancy in perioperative SBP, DBP, and HR between both groups (P>0.05), as demonstrated in Figure 3.Figure 3
Modifications in hemodynamic indexes in the two groups.


## 3.4. Comparison of Stress Indicators between Both Groups

There existed no meaningful discrepancy in the levels of NE, Cor, and GLU before the operation between both groups (P>0.05); the levels of NE, GLU, and Cor in the observation group promptly following the surgery and 24 hours after the operation were lesser than those in the control group (P<0.05), as demonstrated in Figure 4.Figure 4
Comparison of stress indicators between both groups (note:∗ indicated P<0.05 when compared with the observation group).


## 3.5. Comparison of Pain Mediators between Both Groups

There existed no meaningful discrepancy in the levels of SP, PGE2, and 5-HT before operation between both groups (P>0.05); the levels of SP, PGE2, and 5-HT in the observation group promptly following the surgery and 24 hours following the surgery were lesser than those in the control group (P<0.05), as demonstrated in Figure 5.Figure 5
Comparison of pain mediators between both groups (note:∗ indicated P<0.05 when compared to the observation group).


## 3.6. Comparison of Postoperative Recovery between Both Groups

There existed no meaningful discrepancy in vaginal bleeding time, endometrial thickness 3 weeks after operation, and time to start menstruating between both groups (P>0.05), as demonstrated in Figure 6.Figure 6
Comparison of postoperative recovery between both groups.


## 3.7. Comparison of Postoperative Uterine Contraction Pain between Both Groups

The VAS score of the observation group at 10 min and 30 min following the surgery was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05), as demonstrated in Figure 7.Figure 7
Comparison of postoperative VAS scores between both groups (note:∗ indicated P<0.05 when compared to the observation group).


## 3.8. Comparison of the Incidence of Anesthesia-Related Adverse Reactions between the Two Groups

There was no significant difference in the incidence of negative reactions between both groups (P>0.05), as demonstrated in Table 2.Table 2
Comparison of the incidence of anesthesia-related negative reactions between both groups (cases, %).
GroupnBody movementRespiratory depressionBradycardiaNausea and vomitingOverall incidenceObservation group6410126.25Control group64312314.06χ22.141P0.143


## 4. Discussion

Abortion is an important way to terminate early pregnancy. Compared with medical abortion, abortion has the advantages of high success rate of pregnancy termination and fewer complications [14, 15]. At present, it is believed that anesthesia for painless induced abortion requires short-acting, adequate analgesia and sedation and requires the patient to wake up quickly after the operation, restoring directional force and consciousness quickly, without drug residues and aftereffects [16, 17]. Propofol is a short-acting intravenous anesthetic employed for induction and maintaining general anesthesia. Relevant investigations have pointed out that propofol used in painless abortion has the advantages of short-acting sedation, quick onset, and short half-life, but single-drug anesthesia has disadvantages of long postoperative recovery time and high incidence of postoperative uterine contraction pain [18]. It has been reported that combined anesthesia on this basis can further improve the anesthetic effect [19]. Auricular point analgesia has been used in a variety of surgeries or operations that require anesthesia and analgesia. As a new type of intradermal needle, press-needle has acupuncture effect. Compared with the traditional filiform needle, it does not damage the ear cartilage. Compared with the traditional ear point pressing with bean, press-needle can produce stronger benign stimulation to the ear acupoint and strengthen the therapeutic effect. At the same time, the ear press-needle is buried in the skin, which can stimulate the auricular point more accurately, and the paste is firm and stable [20]. In this study, bilateral uterus, pelvic cavity, and Shenmen acupoints were selected based on the bioholographic theory of the auricle, and corresponding acupoints were selected according to the lesion site, namely, the positive reaction point of the lesion. Shenmen acupoint was located in the fourth area of triangular fossa of the ear, slightly above the fork of the upper and lower crura of antihelix. Relevant investigations have emphasized that acupuncture of Shenmen acupoint is able to calm the mood and relieve spasm and pain [21]. The pelvic cavity and uterine acupoints are located in the triangular fossa, and various benign afferent impulses are generated based on stimulation by press-needle, which can participate in the regulation of cranial nerves, that is, the excitation and inhibition of the cerebral cortex, block pathological nerve impulses and sympathetic nerve efferent impulses, or inhibit pathological excitatory foci and restore its normal physiological function. Subcortical, endocrine, and sympathetic acupoints are named in combination with modern anatomy and physiology, and their effects are similar to physiological functions [22, 23]. Subcortical acupoint has the effect of sedation and analgesia, which can regulate the excitation and inhibition process of cerebral cortex and subcortical plant nerve center [24]. Endocrine acupoint can regulate the endocrine system, have anti-inflammatory and analgesic, and enhance immune regulation effects [25]. Sympathetic acupoint can calm the mood and relieve pain, invigorate Qi, and reduce inversion and can regulate the vasomotor function and adjust the visceral function [26]. The results of the present research illustrated that the Ramsay scores in the observation group at T1 and T2 time points were lesser than those in the control group, the total dosage of propofol was less than that in the control group, and the recovery time of directional force was shorter than that in the control group. The results showed that propofol anesthesia in combination with press-needle therapy is capable of improving the anesthetic influence, decreasing the dosage of anesthetic drugs, and promoting the rapid recovery of postoperative directional force.Under stress, the body’s sympathetic nerves are excited, which promotes the production of NE and Cor and increases blood sugar [27, 28]. Abortion requires cervical forceps to stretch and expand the cervix and use a curette to scratch the uterine wall, which can cause local pain, lead to sympathetic nerve excitation, and increase the synthesis of catecholamines, resulting in hemodynamic fluctuations [29]. The use of anesthetic drugs is very important to maintain hemodynamic stability and ensure the safety of patients. This study found that there were no meaningful discrepancies in perioperative SBP, DBP, and HR between both groups, indicating that single-drug anesthesia and combined anesthesia with press-needle had little effect on hemodynamics. In addition, this study found that the levels of NE, Cor, and GLU in the observation group immediately after the operation and 24 hours after the operation were lower than those in the control group, illustrating that combined anesthesia with press-needle is capable of reducing the stress state of patients undergoing abortion. This is mainly because the auricular acupoint has a benign bidirectional regulation function. The tiny nerve branches weave a network in the auricle, and a considerable number of sympathetic nerves are distributed on the auricle. Stimulation of auricular acupoint can cause the thalamus to regulate the excitation of sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves of the body, inhibit the stress response of the sympathetic nucleus on pain, promote the release of antipain neurotransmitters, improve the pain threshold, and reduce the body’s sensitivity to pain [30].SP, PGE2, and 5-HT are pain mediators related to the occurrence and intensification of pain [31]. SP is a neuropeptide with injury-stimulating properties that widely exists in the systemic system and can aggravate pain by promoting the release of pain-causing factor 5-HT and also plays a role in transmitting pain information [32]. PGE2 is an inflammatory medium that can enhance the excitability of receptors and enhance the sensitivity of nerves to painful stimuli, thus producing lasting pain [33]. 5-HT is distributed in the central nervous system and has a direct pain-causing effect, which can act locally through second messengers and stimulate sensory nerve endings to produce pain [34, 35]. Relevant studies have pointed out that stimulating auricular acupoints can regulate inflammatory factors and relieve pain caused by the release of inflammatory mediators [36]. The findings of the current survey illustrated that the levels of SP, PGE2, and 5-HT in the observation group immediately after the operation and 24 hours after the operation were lower than those in the control group, indicating that combined analgesia with press-needle with may inhibit the release of pain mediators, which may be an important reason why this method can relieve pain in patients. The reason is that press-needle therapy stimulates the nerve endings, makes the nerves excited, and then travels along the corresponding nerve conduction pathway to the central nervous system, thereby activating the regulation of the nervous system and stimulating the release of prostaglandins and other chemicals, thereby affecting blood circulation, in order to achieve analgesic effect. Acupuncture at pelvis and uterus acupoints can block pathological nerve impulses and sympathetic nerve efferent impulses and inhibit pathological excitatory foci. Therefore, the authors believe that press-needle acupuncture at this acupoint may help restore its normal physiological function. However, the outcomes of this research illustrated that there existed no substantial discrepancies between both groups in the vaginal bleeding time, endometrial thickness 3 weeks after operation, and time to start menstruating, indicating that the propofol intravenous anesthesia combined with press-needle therapy would not affect the uterine recovery of patients after painless abortion.Press-needle acupuncture at multiple acupoints can enhance the analgesic effect, relieve the nervous state of the brain, and reduce the sensitivity of the patient’s response to pain. This study found that combined anesthesia can reduce the severity of postoperative uterine contraction pain, which further confirmed that this method can relieve postoperative pain. Relevant studies have pointed out that press-needle analgesia can reduce adverse reactions such as nausea and vomiting caused by stimulation of the vagus nerve [37]. However, the outcomes of the current research illustrated that there existed no meaningful discrepancy in the incidence of postoperative negative reactions between both groups, demonstrating that press-needle analgesia had little effect on the adverse reactions related to anesthesia in patients, which was consistent with the above study results, which could be relevant to the small size of cases included in this research, so further analysis is needed in the later stage.In conclusion, propofol combined with press-needle anesthesia can improve the analgesic effect of painless abortion during operation, relieve the uterine contraction pain after operation, inhibit the release of postoperative pain media, and improve the stress state of body. However, the observation group was given acupuncture therapy, while the control group was not given the corresponding acupuncture treatment, which could not really prove that acupuncture on the corresponding acupoints had an effect, and the placebo effect could not be ruled out. In addition, the effect of acupuncture may be closely related to the practice of acupuncturists, so multiple acupuncturists may have a certain impact on the results. In future research, we will further expand the sample size and set up a better corresponding control group to improve this research.



---

*Source: 6543211-2022-08-08.xml*