# Determination of Trace Elements inCorydalis conspersa and Corydalis linarioides by ICP-AES

Authors: Qing Du; Yanguo Cai; Zhi Chen; Dongliang Wei; Yande Cao; Ying Chen; Shulin Yu; Qianqian Zhao; Jiang Wu; Mingdi Liu
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

In order to establish a method for the simultaneous determination of trace elements Al, As, B, Ca, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, P, Si, Ti, and Zn inCorydalis conspersa and Corydalis linarioides, we collected the samples from different areas and treated with acid hydrolysis into tissues to be detected by the way of inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry compared with the standard element control method. We can know that the contents of Al, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Na, and P in roots, stems, leaves, and flowers were higher. The contents of elements in different tissues and areas were as follows: flower > leaf > stem > root, Zeku County > Guide County > Nangqian County > Henan County. Among them, the contents of each element in the flowers of Maixiu Forest Farm were higher, while the contents of B, Cr, Cu, Li, Mn, Ni, Si, Ti, and Zn in roots, stems, and leaves of other areas were lower. The contents of heavy metal elements complied with the limit degree. A 3-factor model was obtained by principal component analysis which could clarify 82.46% of the total experimental data; the factors of Al, Fe, Mg, Na, P, Ca, Cu, Si, and Zn had great influence on the efficacy of 21 kinds of medicinal materials. Cluster analysis classified the samples into three categories; the flowers of Corydalis conspersa and stems of Corydalis linarioides from different collection areas are clustered containing high contents of type 1 and 3 characteristic components; the roots, stems, and leaves from other collection areas are clustered with low contents of 1 and 2 characteristic components. It can be used for the determination of trace elements in Corydalis conspersa and Corydalis linarioides to provide effective basis for revealing the function of trace elements with plant growth.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Corydalis conspersa and Corydalis linarioides are both Corydalis plants belonging to Papaveraceae Family. They are distributed in the Provinces of Shanxi, Gansu, Ningxia, Qinghai, Sichuan, and Tibet Prefecture [1]. They were found under forests, forest margins, shrubs, grass slopes, or crevices at an altitude of 2100–4000 meters. Corydalis conspersa was first published in the list of Tibetan plants, and it is called Gandong Ouru in Tibet. It is bitter, astringent, and cold in nature. It has small poison and enters the lung and spleen organs. It has the effect of clearing away heat and detoxification, killing insects, and relieving itching. It is used for sore poison, snake bite, intractable diseases, psoriasis, scabies, etc. [2]. Corydalis linarioides is a famous medicine in Taibai Mountain and Tibetan medicine in Qinghai Province, while the Tibetan medicine is called Jiadaseva [3].There have the organic chemical components and inorganic chemical elements in the traditional Chinese medicine. In 1869, Russian scientist Dmitri Mendeleev created the periodic table of elements. Up to now, there are 118 kinds of chemical elements. The trace elements in the study include 13 metal elements Al, Ca, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Ti, and Zn and 4 nonmetallic elements As, B, P, and Si. Chemical elements have their own physical and chemical properties which play an important physiological role in plants and have a close relationship between the nature, taste, efficacy, and Traditional Chinese Medicine. Therefore, the study of chemical elements in different collection areas and tissues ofCorydalis conspersa and Corydalis linarioides can be used as an important index material basis for distinguishing the quality of medicinal materials and exploring the mechanism of curative effect related to chemical elements.The main methods for the determination of elements in Chinese medicinal materials are colorimetry [4–6], AAS [7], atomic fluorescence spectrometry [8], inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-OES/AES) [9, 10], and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) [11]. The plasma can reach a very high temperature by the ICP-AES, which is conducive to the atoms or ions in the elements to emit photons of characteristic wavelengths decomposed into monochromatic spectra representing each element through the grating spectroscopic system. These spectral energies are detected by the semiconductor detector, and the content of the elements to be measured in the test solution is compared to the standard solution. It has the advantages of high sensitivity, low detection limit, and wide test range to simultaneously determine the multiple elements.The content of trace elements inCorydalis conspersa and Corydalis linarioides was determined by ICP-AES to provide a certain scientific basis for the further researches regarding the meaningful functions of the elements within the plant tissues and metabolism of plant growth.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Collection and Treatment of Drug

The medicinal materials were collected in Hainan, Huangnan, Yushu, and Haibei Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture of Qinghai Province in August 2017. After identification by Professor Lin Pengcheng (Qinghai Nationalities University), the authors compared the specimens with the China and Qinghai flora to identify them asCorydalis conspersa and Corydalis linarioides.After cleaning the fresh plants, they were divided into dried roots, stems, leaves, and flowers in the shade and crushed using a 80-mesh sieve (Table1 and Figure 1).Table 1
Specific information of collected samples fromCorydalis conspersa and Corydalis linarioides.
No.CodeOriginPlaceTissue1BHHJ-LJS-RCounty of Guide from Hainan ZhouLa Ji MountainRoot2BHHJ-LJS-SStem3BHHJ-LJS-LLeaf4BHHJ-LJS-FFlower5BHHJ-NQ-RCounty of Zhao Xiao from Yushu ZhouXiang Longxiagu MountainRoot6BHHJ-NQ-SStem7BHHJ-NQ-LLeaf8BHHJ-NQ-FFlower9BHHJ-MXLC-RCounty of Zeku from Huangnan ZhouMaixiu LinchangRoot10BHHJ-MXLC-SStem11BHHJ-MXLC-LLeaf12BHHJ-MXLC-FFlower13BHHJ-JGS-RTuo Yemaxiang from Huangnan ZhouJi Gang MountainRoot14BHHJ-JGS-SStem15BHHJ-JGS-LLeaf16BHHJ-JGS-FFlower17BHHJ-QL-RCounty of Qilian from Haibei ZhouQilian MountainRoot18BHHJ-QL-SStem19BHHJ-QL-LLeaf20TLHJ-JGS-RTuo Yemaxiang from Huangnan ZhouJi Gang MountainRoot21TLHJ-JGS-SStemFigure 1
Areas of sample collecting.


### 2.2. Reference and Reagent Materials

Single element standard solution (National Institute of Nonferrous Metals, Tanmo Quality Control Standard Material Center, concentration of 1000μg/ml) (Table 2), concentrated hydrochloric acid, concentrated nitric acid (Tianjin Bodi Chemical Co., Ltd. and Jiangyin Runma Electronic Materials Co., Ltd., electronic grade), microporous membrane (0.45 μm, Tianjin Jinteng Experimental Equipment Co., Ltd.), and purified water (Asia silicon industry) (self-made by limited liability company) were purchased.Table 2
Information of single element standard solution.
Name of elementNo. of national standardBatch numberAlBW30019-1000-NC-50B1908104AsGSB04-1714-2004184020-4BGSB04-1716-2004187052-1CaGSB04-1720-200418C011-3CrGSB04-1723-2004 (a)188016-4CuGSB04-1725-200418C039-2FeGBW (E) 083185B1908003KGSB04-1733-20041870430-3LiGSB04-1734-200418B041-2MgGSB04-1735-2004184043-3MnGSB04-1736-200417A011-1NaGSB04-1738-2004187025-4NiGSB04-1740-2004187042-2PGSB04-1741-2004 (a)191065-1SiGSB04-1752-2004 (a)184043TiGSB04-1757-2004187022ZnGSB04-1761-200418B027-1


### 2.3. Instruments

Inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Technology Co., Ltd., model 6300), pure water treatment system (Asia Silicon Co., Ltd.), BP211D electronic balance (Sartorius company, Germany), Micropipette (Dragon lab), and Automatic sampler (CETAC asx-520x) were used.


### 2.4. Working Parameters of the Instrument

The working parameters of the instrument are listed in Table3.Table 3
Working parameters of ICP-AES instrument.
ICP-AES working parametersValuesRF power1150 WGenerator temperature26°CPump speed25 rpmPhoto temperature−46.21°CAuxiliary gas flow0.5 L/minLight chamber temperature37.9°CFlushing pump speed100 rpmAnalysis of pump speed25 rpmPlasma stabilization time10 min


### 2.5. Selection of Analysis Line

According to the principles of low detection limit, high sensitivity, less interference of coexisting elements, and low spectral interference, the following analytical lines (nm) were selected for analysis [12]: Al, 396.152; As, 197.262; B, 208.959; Ca, 317.033; Cr, 267.716; Cu, 324.754; Fe, 259.940; K, 766.490; Li, 460.286; Mg, 270.553; Mn, 257.610; Na, 589.592; Ni, 231.604; P, 177.495; Si, 251.611; Ti, 334.941; and Zn, 231.856.


### 2.6. Preparation of Solutions

#### 2.6.1. Preparation of Single Reference Solution

The concentration of single standard solution of Al, As, B, Ca, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, P, Si, Ti, and Zn is 1000μg/ml.


#### 2.6.2. Preparation of Mixed Reference Solution

Accurately suck 5.0 ml of each element standard solution in Table2, put it into a 500.0 ml volumetric flask, and fix the volume with 5% HNO3 to prepare 10 μg/ml element mixed standard solution; accurately absorb 10 μg/ml element mixed standard solution with appropriate amount of 1.0, 10.0, 20.0, 30.0, 40.0, and 50.0 ml, put into a 100.0 ml volumetric flask, and fix the volume of 5% HNO3 to prepare 0.1, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 μg/ml, respectively, and 10.0 μg/ml of mixed standard solution.


#### 2.6.3. Preparation of Test Solution

Accurately weigh 0.2 g (0.01-0.02 g for flower) ofCorydalis conspersa and Corydalis linarioides, put them into a conical flask with stopper, add 15.0 ml HNO3: HCl (3 : 1) mixed acid solution in the fume hood, shake well, and dissolve; close the plug and soak in the fume hood overnight. The acid solution in the fume hood was heated and digested on an electric furnace for 30 min-2 h until dried; 4.0 ml HNO3: HCl (3 : 1) mixed acid solution was added to each sample, and then the mixture was shaken and digested overnight. After overnight, the acid solution is heated and digested in an electric furnace and kept boiling for 30 min-2 h on the condition of fume hood. After the white smoke is exhausted, the acid is evaporated until cooled. Then, each sample is diluted with 5% HCl solution into a 100.0 ml volumetric flask and placed overnight. 0.45 μm aqueous-phase microporous filter membrane is used to filter into a 50.0 ml plastic quantitative tube and then put into the refrigerator for freezing. At the same time, 5% HCl and 5% HNO3 were used as blank control solution [13].


### 2.7. Development and Validation of Method

The method for detection, separation, and quantitation of the three copies samples was developed and combined the conditions with reference. The validation parameters investigated included linearity and its range, limits of detection and quantitation, precision, stability, repeatability, and recovery.


#### 2.7.1. Study of Linear Relationship and Limits of Detection and Quantitation

Under the working conditions of ICP-AES, the mixed standard solution of 0.1, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, and 10.0μg/ml was determined and the standard curve was drawn with the concentration as the abscissa and the average value of the three intensity measurements as the ordinate. The limits of detection and quantitation were calculated by dividing the 3 and 10 times standard deviation of the measured value from the blank control solution by the slope of the corresponding element standard curve, respectively.


#### 2.7.2. Precision Experiment

Precisely, the same sample solution is drawn for injection, and each sample is detected for 6 times.


#### 2.7.3. Stability Experiment

The same sample solution was precisely absorbed, and the contents of 17 elements were determined at 0.0, 3.0, and 24.0 h after preparation under the determination conditions.


#### 2.7.4. Repeatability Experiment

Around 0.2 g of 5 copies ofCorydalis conspersa powder was accurately weighed. The samples were prepared according to the way of test solution preparation, and the RSD values of various elements in the samples were determined.


#### 2.7.5. Recovery Experiment

Accurately weigh 6 copies ofCorydalis powder with known content. The samples were prepared according to the way of test solution preparation and filtered with 0.45 µm microporous membrane, taking 10.0 ml of test solution, adding 1.0 ppm and 10.0 ppm of element mixed standard solution 10.0 ml, respectively, three copies of each concentration, fixing the volume to 50 ml with 5% hydrochloric acid, and mixed well to be detected according to ICP-AES conditions.


## 2.1. Collection and Treatment of Drug

The medicinal materials were collected in Hainan, Huangnan, Yushu, and Haibei Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture of Qinghai Province in August 2017. After identification by Professor Lin Pengcheng (Qinghai Nationalities University), the authors compared the specimens with the China and Qinghai flora to identify them asCorydalis conspersa and Corydalis linarioides.After cleaning the fresh plants, they were divided into dried roots, stems, leaves, and flowers in the shade and crushed using a 80-mesh sieve (Table1 and Figure 1).Table 1
Specific information of collected samples fromCorydalis conspersa and Corydalis linarioides.
No.CodeOriginPlaceTissue1BHHJ-LJS-RCounty of Guide from Hainan ZhouLa Ji MountainRoot2BHHJ-LJS-SStem3BHHJ-LJS-LLeaf4BHHJ-LJS-FFlower5BHHJ-NQ-RCounty of Zhao Xiao from Yushu ZhouXiang Longxiagu MountainRoot6BHHJ-NQ-SStem7BHHJ-NQ-LLeaf8BHHJ-NQ-FFlower9BHHJ-MXLC-RCounty of Zeku from Huangnan ZhouMaixiu LinchangRoot10BHHJ-MXLC-SStem11BHHJ-MXLC-LLeaf12BHHJ-MXLC-FFlower13BHHJ-JGS-RTuo Yemaxiang from Huangnan ZhouJi Gang MountainRoot14BHHJ-JGS-SStem15BHHJ-JGS-LLeaf16BHHJ-JGS-FFlower17BHHJ-QL-RCounty of Qilian from Haibei ZhouQilian MountainRoot18BHHJ-QL-SStem19BHHJ-QL-LLeaf20TLHJ-JGS-RTuo Yemaxiang from Huangnan ZhouJi Gang MountainRoot21TLHJ-JGS-SStemFigure 1
Areas of sample collecting.


## 2.2. Reference and Reagent Materials

Single element standard solution (National Institute of Nonferrous Metals, Tanmo Quality Control Standard Material Center, concentration of 1000μg/ml) (Table 2), concentrated hydrochloric acid, concentrated nitric acid (Tianjin Bodi Chemical Co., Ltd. and Jiangyin Runma Electronic Materials Co., Ltd., electronic grade), microporous membrane (0.45 μm, Tianjin Jinteng Experimental Equipment Co., Ltd.), and purified water (Asia silicon industry) (self-made by limited liability company) were purchased.Table 2
Information of single element standard solution.
Name of elementNo. of national standardBatch numberAlBW30019-1000-NC-50B1908104AsGSB04-1714-2004184020-4BGSB04-1716-2004187052-1CaGSB04-1720-200418C011-3CrGSB04-1723-2004 (a)188016-4CuGSB04-1725-200418C039-2FeGBW (E) 083185B1908003KGSB04-1733-20041870430-3LiGSB04-1734-200418B041-2MgGSB04-1735-2004184043-3MnGSB04-1736-200417A011-1NaGSB04-1738-2004187025-4NiGSB04-1740-2004187042-2PGSB04-1741-2004 (a)191065-1SiGSB04-1752-2004 (a)184043TiGSB04-1757-2004187022ZnGSB04-1761-200418B027-1


## 2.3. Instruments

Inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Technology Co., Ltd., model 6300), pure water treatment system (Asia Silicon Co., Ltd.), BP211D electronic balance (Sartorius company, Germany), Micropipette (Dragon lab), and Automatic sampler (CETAC asx-520x) were used.


## 2.4. Working Parameters of the Instrument

The working parameters of the instrument are listed in Table3.Table 3
Working parameters of ICP-AES instrument.
ICP-AES working parametersValuesRF power1150 WGenerator temperature26°CPump speed25 rpmPhoto temperature−46.21°CAuxiliary gas flow0.5 L/minLight chamber temperature37.9°CFlushing pump speed100 rpmAnalysis of pump speed25 rpmPlasma stabilization time10 min


## 2.5. Selection of Analysis Line

According to the principles of low detection limit, high sensitivity, less interference of coexisting elements, and low spectral interference, the following analytical lines (nm) were selected for analysis [12]: Al, 396.152; As, 197.262; B, 208.959; Ca, 317.033; Cr, 267.716; Cu, 324.754; Fe, 259.940; K, 766.490; Li, 460.286; Mg, 270.553; Mn, 257.610; Na, 589.592; Ni, 231.604; P, 177.495; Si, 251.611; Ti, 334.941; and Zn, 231.856.


## 2.6. Preparation of Solutions

### 2.6.1. Preparation of Single Reference Solution

The concentration of single standard solution of Al, As, B, Ca, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, P, Si, Ti, and Zn is 1000μg/ml.


### 2.6.2. Preparation of Mixed Reference Solution

Accurately suck 5.0 ml of each element standard solution in Table2, put it into a 500.0 ml volumetric flask, and fix the volume with 5% HNO3 to prepare 10 μg/ml element mixed standard solution; accurately absorb 10 μg/ml element mixed standard solution with appropriate amount of 1.0, 10.0, 20.0, 30.0, 40.0, and 50.0 ml, put into a 100.0 ml volumetric flask, and fix the volume of 5% HNO3 to prepare 0.1, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 μg/ml, respectively, and 10.0 μg/ml of mixed standard solution.


### 2.6.3. Preparation of Test Solution

Accurately weigh 0.2 g (0.01-0.02 g for flower) ofCorydalis conspersa and Corydalis linarioides, put them into a conical flask with stopper, add 15.0 ml HNO3: HCl (3 : 1) mixed acid solution in the fume hood, shake well, and dissolve; close the plug and soak in the fume hood overnight. The acid solution in the fume hood was heated and digested on an electric furnace for 30 min-2 h until dried; 4.0 ml HNO3: HCl (3 : 1) mixed acid solution was added to each sample, and then the mixture was shaken and digested overnight. After overnight, the acid solution is heated and digested in an electric furnace and kept boiling for 30 min-2 h on the condition of fume hood. After the white smoke is exhausted, the acid is evaporated until cooled. Then, each sample is diluted with 5% HCl solution into a 100.0 ml volumetric flask and placed overnight. 0.45 μm aqueous-phase microporous filter membrane is used to filter into a 50.0 ml plastic quantitative tube and then put into the refrigerator for freezing. At the same time, 5% HCl and 5% HNO3 were used as blank control solution [13].


## 2.6.1. Preparation of Single Reference Solution

The concentration of single standard solution of Al, As, B, Ca, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, P, Si, Ti, and Zn is 1000μg/ml.


## 2.6.2. Preparation of Mixed Reference Solution

Accurately suck 5.0 ml of each element standard solution in Table2, put it into a 500.0 ml volumetric flask, and fix the volume with 5% HNO3 to prepare 10 μg/ml element mixed standard solution; accurately absorb 10 μg/ml element mixed standard solution with appropriate amount of 1.0, 10.0, 20.0, 30.0, 40.0, and 50.0 ml, put into a 100.0 ml volumetric flask, and fix the volume of 5% HNO3 to prepare 0.1, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 μg/ml, respectively, and 10.0 μg/ml of mixed standard solution.


## 2.6.3. Preparation of Test Solution

Accurately weigh 0.2 g (0.01-0.02 g for flower) ofCorydalis conspersa and Corydalis linarioides, put them into a conical flask with stopper, add 15.0 ml HNO3: HCl (3 : 1) mixed acid solution in the fume hood, shake well, and dissolve; close the plug and soak in the fume hood overnight. The acid solution in the fume hood was heated and digested on an electric furnace for 30 min-2 h until dried; 4.0 ml HNO3: HCl (3 : 1) mixed acid solution was added to each sample, and then the mixture was shaken and digested overnight. After overnight, the acid solution is heated and digested in an electric furnace and kept boiling for 30 min-2 h on the condition of fume hood. After the white smoke is exhausted, the acid is evaporated until cooled. Then, each sample is diluted with 5% HCl solution into a 100.0 ml volumetric flask and placed overnight. 0.45 μm aqueous-phase microporous filter membrane is used to filter into a 50.0 ml plastic quantitative tube and then put into the refrigerator for freezing. At the same time, 5% HCl and 5% HNO3 were used as blank control solution [13].


## 2.7. Development and Validation of Method

The method for detection, separation, and quantitation of the three copies samples was developed and combined the conditions with reference. The validation parameters investigated included linearity and its range, limits of detection and quantitation, precision, stability, repeatability, and recovery.


### 2.7.1. Study of Linear Relationship and Limits of Detection and Quantitation

Under the working conditions of ICP-AES, the mixed standard solution of 0.1, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, and 10.0μg/ml was determined and the standard curve was drawn with the concentration as the abscissa and the average value of the three intensity measurements as the ordinate. The limits of detection and quantitation were calculated by dividing the 3 and 10 times standard deviation of the measured value from the blank control solution by the slope of the corresponding element standard curve, respectively.


### 2.7.2. Precision Experiment

Precisely, the same sample solution is drawn for injection, and each sample is detected for 6 times.


### 2.7.3. Stability Experiment

The same sample solution was precisely absorbed, and the contents of 17 elements were determined at 0.0, 3.0, and 24.0 h after preparation under the determination conditions.


### 2.7.4. Repeatability Experiment

Around 0.2 g of 5 copies ofCorydalis conspersa powder was accurately weighed. The samples were prepared according to the way of test solution preparation, and the RSD values of various elements in the samples were determined.


### 2.7.5. Recovery Experiment

Accurately weigh 6 copies ofCorydalis powder with known content. The samples were prepared according to the way of test solution preparation and filtered with 0.45 µm microporous membrane, taking 10.0 ml of test solution, adding 1.0 ppm and 10.0 ppm of element mixed standard solution 10.0 ml, respectively, three copies of each concentration, fixing the volume to 50 ml with 5% hydrochloric acid, and mixed well to be detected according to ICP-AES conditions.


## 2.7.1. Study of Linear Relationship and Limits of Detection and Quantitation

Under the working conditions of ICP-AES, the mixed standard solution of 0.1, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, and 10.0μg/ml was determined and the standard curve was drawn with the concentration as the abscissa and the average value of the three intensity measurements as the ordinate. The limits of detection and quantitation were calculated by dividing the 3 and 10 times standard deviation of the measured value from the blank control solution by the slope of the corresponding element standard curve, respectively.


## 2.7.2. Precision Experiment

Precisely, the same sample solution is drawn for injection, and each sample is detected for 6 times.


## 2.7.3. Stability Experiment

The same sample solution was precisely absorbed, and the contents of 17 elements were determined at 0.0, 3.0, and 24.0 h after preparation under the determination conditions.


## 2.7.4. Repeatability Experiment

Around 0.2 g of 5 copies ofCorydalis conspersa powder was accurately weighed. The samples were prepared according to the way of test solution preparation, and the RSD values of various elements in the samples were determined.


## 2.7.5. Recovery Experiment

Accurately weigh 6 copies ofCorydalis powder with known content. The samples were prepared according to the way of test solution preparation and filtered with 0.45 µm microporous membrane, taking 10.0 ml of test solution, adding 1.0 ppm and 10.0 ppm of element mixed standard solution 10.0 ml, respectively, three copies of each concentration, fixing the volume to 50 ml with 5% hydrochloric acid, and mixed well to be detected according to ICP-AES conditions.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Methodology Validation

#### 3.1.1. Linear Relationship and Limit

The regression equation of trace elements has a good linear relationship withR ≥ 0.9996. The detection limits were between 0.0001 μg/g and 0.1024 μg/g. The quantitation limits were between 0.0003 μg/g and 0.3103 μg/g (Table 4).Table 4
Linear correlation and ranges and limits of trace elements reference substances.
ElementsRegression equationLinear range (μg/mL)Correlation coefficientLimit of detection (μg/g)Limit of quantitation (μg/g)AlY = 16455x + 2.44050.1–60.01.00000.00050.0015AsY = 44.772x − 1.01210.1–10.01.00000.04800.1440BY = 1817x + 0.09070.1–10.01.00000.00130.0039CaY = 15662x + 56.2190.1–100.01.00000.00010.0003CrY = 11792x − 0.02310.1–10.01.00000.00020.0006CuY = 16059x + 0.25130.1–10.01.00000.00410.0124FeY = 11077x − 3698.50.1–60.00.99990.00050.0015KY = 194954x − 3.63050.1–30.01.00000.00010.0003LiY = 1176.8x − 2.8230.1–10.01.00000.00420.0127MgY = 198929x + 12.4180.1–10.01.00000.00010.0003MnY = 54078x + 1.05990.1–10.01.00000.00010.0003NaY = 573630x + 9.33030.1–30.01.00000.00010.0003NiY = 4611.7x + 0.1030.1–10.01.00000.00030.0009PY = 212.82x − 0.01290.1–10.01.00000.10240.3103SiY = 2886.8x + 1601.60.1–30.00.99960.04290.1300TiY = 32280x − 2.96750.1–10.01.00000.00180.0054ZnY = 8430.1x + 0.41320.1–10.01.00000.00560.0170


#### 3.1.2. Precision Experiment

The results showed that the average contents of Al, As, B, Ca, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, P, Si, Ti, and Zn were 1.86, 0.22, 0.04, 31.09, 0.12, 0.04, 2.13, 11.34, 0.21, 5.11, 0.08, 3.06, 0.03, 3.46, 1.67, 0.05, and 1.07 mg/g, respectively. The RSD of the contents was between 0.27% and 3.87% (n = 6).


#### 3.1.3. Stability Experiment

The results showed that the content of each element was stable within 24 h after samples preparation and was detected by the conditions listed in Table3. The RSD values of various elements were between 0.35% and 4.70%.


#### 3.1.4. Repeatability Experiment

The RSD values were 0.20%–3.54%, indicating that the method had good repeatability.


#### 3.1.5. Sample Recovery

We acquired the average recoveries of Al, As, B, Ca, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, P, Si, Ti, and Zn were 119.83%, 121.55%, 121.77%, 104.38%, 114.67%, 120.33%, 110.31%, 104.83%, 113.16%, 117.04%, 115.57%, 111.88%, 121.83%, 113.79%, 115.74%, 108.68%, and 109.64%, respectively. The RSD values were in the range of 1.84%–3.89%.


### 3.2. Content of Different Elements in Medicinal Materials

#### 3.2.1. Samples from Different Areas and Tissues

In order to study the specific content of different elements in the collection areas and tissues, a three-dimensional characterization map was drawn for the detection of element content. It showed that the higher contents of different elements in roots, stems, leaves, and flowers in different collection areas were Al, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Na, and P. The contents of elements in different tissues were as follows: flowers > leaves > stems > roots. The contents of elements in flowers of Maixiu Forest Farm from Henan County of Huangnan Prefecture were highest than those in other areas. However, the contents of different elements As, B, Cr, Cu, Li, Mn, Ni, Si, Ti, and Zn were lower in the plants (Table5 and Figure 2).Table 5
Determination results of trace elements from drugs ofCorydalis conspersa and Corydalis linarioides (μg/g, n = 3).
Area and no. of tissuesContents of different elements (μg/g)AlAsBCaCrCuFeKLiMgMnNaNiPSiTiZnBHHJ-LJS-R0.15900.01980.00142.58340.00630.00180.22151.18360.01771.03540.01010.33790.00460.54280.02130.00390.0440BHHJ-LJS-S0.29390.00160.019243.07780.01540.01240.36695.53440.02183.56960.09216.62190.01251.58560.06100.01020.0843BHHJ-LJS-L0.15850.01560.029620.35130.01540.00640.48385.03120.03003.38290.03833.55760.08811.38690.05570.00720.0705BHHJ-LJS-F2.01680.09590.079573.31820.20630.06963.317413.69370.64078.11140.114929.83390.06853.87600.23040.06500.5812BHHJ-NQ-R0.09640.00670.01995.77550.01030.00450.20161.64110.02432.34800.01400.32900.00311.23150.11710.00350.0738BHHJ-NQ-S0.26880.00950.020816.07050.01640.00380.328110.27570.02293.35680.02350.32470.00441.79990.04710.00690.0604BHHJ-NQ-L0.36660.00580.062326.06270.01310.00880.37499.13700.02143.79960.04992.43360.00381.76510.22010.01120.0595BHHJ-NQ-F1.79070.19440.031225.11300.11010.03532.045110.64360.12264.88970.08493.14780.02543.14201.13690.05951.2251BHHJ-MXLC-R0.44140.00780.01166.15230.03630.01430.87422.84080.00541.86210.02420.34010.02342.29525.76010.00950.1145BHHJ-MXLC-S0.18490.01540.022218.69120.01530.00850.29155.23150.01801.80950.03680.39140.01261.15730.01310.00650.0578BHHJ-MXLC-L0.28620.01050.023821.09560.01660.00960.40385.33250.01292.10060.03960.37800.02781.13975.82710.01020.0758BHHJ-MXLC-F1.35220.12620.1055100.09320.08471.69892.164215.92340.17809.87880.223824.34290.01885.070623.88750.04510.3493BHHJ-JGS-R0.21700.01310.07228.91430.10310.00801.47774.07400.02102.40970.02420.22030.00551.48920.03370.00510.0823BHHJ-JGS-S0.16290.00500.074417.88590.03020.00440.616211.58550.00452.35960.02690.33640.00271.70580.05930.00540.0419BHHJ-JGS-L0.31590.00830.094420.98430.02490.00710.71288.65520.01253.27740.05190.16900.00281.76660.08880.00860.0702BHHJ-JGS-F1.88680.04690.591216.19900.05140.02772.95169.86180.09415.00480.08682.89240.01622.57251.03060.05250.5076BHHJ-QL-R0.04130.00860.00632.72900.00300.00290.13020.96690.01290.97830.00860.17130.00230.94760.15340.00140.0949BHHJ-QL-S0.34340.00840.016617.87690.00800.00820.65619.54230.02072.36540.03220.26060.00641.57250.01730.01080.0742BHHJ-QL-L0.65400.01140.054919.60200.00610.00780.79497.32280.01772.93790.05000.36880.00921.62960.03220.01440.0496TLHJ-JGS-R0.15510.00540.00657.17420.01420.00510.22831.81520.03020.89330.02322.18490.00350.55311.57280.00470.0628TLHJ-JGS-S1.77780.12140.366736.14620.11960.69101.93159.93610.27592.96960.293425.57910.02811.354110.03150.04060.5851Figure 2
Contents of diverse elements from the different areas and tissues. Note: BHHJ-LJS-R/S/L/F: root, stem, leaf, and flower of Guide County from Hainan Autonomous Prefecture ofCorydalis conspersa; BHHJ-NQ-R/S/L/F: root, stem, leaf, and flower of Nangqian County from Yushu Autonomous Prefecture of Corydalis conspersa; BHHJ-MXLC-R/S/L/F: root, stem, leaf, and flower of Zeku County from Huangnan Autonomous Prefecture of Corydalis conspersa; BHHJ-JGS-R/S/L/F: root, stem, leaf, and flower of Henan County from Huangnan Autonomous Prefecture of Corydalis conspersa; BHHJ-QL-R/S/L: root, stem, and leaf of Qilian County from Haibei Autonomous Prefecture of Corydalis conspersa; TLHJ-JGS-R/S: root and stem of Henan County from Huangnan Autonomous Prefecture of Corydalis linarioides.


#### 3.2.2. Accumulation Contents from Different Areas and Tissues

The accumulation of various elements in different parts of each collection area was the highest in flowers: Zeku County > Guide County > Nangqian County > Henan County; the stems and leaves were the second, and the roots were the lowest. The results showed that the accumulation of various elements in the flowers: Maixiu Forest Farm from Henan County of Huangnan Prefecture (185.54μg/g), was the highest, Guide County (136.32 μg/g) and Qilian County (53.80 μg/g) were the second, and Ji Gang Mountain (43.87 μg/g) from Henan County of Huangnan Prefecture was the lowest. The accumulation of various elements in the leaves: Nangqian County (44.40 μg/g), was the highest. The accumulation of various elements in the stems: Henan County of Huangnan Prefecture (92.25 μg/g), was the highest. The accumulation of various elements in the roots: Henan County of Huangnan Prefecture (20.81 μg/g and 19.17 μg/g), was the highest (Table 5 and Figure 3).Figure 3
Accumulation content of elements from the different areas and tissues (note: the same as the Figure2).According to the analysis of the whole element accumulation contents, the accumulation content of elements in different tissues of collection areas was higher as follows: Nangqian County of Yushu Prefecture, Henan County of Huangnan Prefecture, Qilian County of Haibei Prefecture, and Guide County of Hainan Prefecture, while those of flowers > stems > leaves > roots. The amount of flower (43.87μg/g − 185.54 μg/g) was the highest; the root (6.19 μg/g − 11.90 μg/g) was the lowest, and the leaf (33.56 μg/g − 44.40 μg/g) and the stem (27.96 μg/g − 92.25 μg/g) were higher in the Guide County from Hainan Autonomous Prefecture of Corydalis conspersa (Table 5 and Figure 3).


### 3.3. Analysis of Principal Components [14, 15]

#### 3.3.1. Eigenvalues and Contribution Rate of Principal Components

In the results of principal component analysis, the KMO value is 0.647 > 0.6, which indicates that factor analysis is suitable and significance value in the sphericity test is 0.000 < 0.05 (significant level), indicating that there is correlation among variables and factor analysis. We can know the description of the original variables by the initial solution in the process of principal component analysis. The cumulative contribution rate of the total variance from three principal components is 82.46%, which means that the mathematical model established by the extracted three factors can clarify 82.46% of the experimental data. The contribution rate of principal component 1 is about 62%, which is more than half of the cumulative contribution rate of the whole principal component (Table6).Table 6
Eigenvalue and variance contribution rate of principal component analysis.
Principle componentEigenvalueContribution (%)Accumulating contribution (%)110.58062.23662.23622.11712.45474.69131.3217.77282.46340.9195.40587.86850.8054.73892.60660.5353.14695.75270.3432.01797.76980.1670.98398.75390.0870.51299.265100.0540.31999.583110.0320.18899.771120.0210.12199.892130.0120.07299.964140.0030.02199.984150.0020.01199.996160.0010.00399.999170.0000.001100.000


#### 3.3.2. Factor Load Matrix of Principal Component Analysis

The loading coefficients of Al, Ti, and Fe in the first principal component are 0.915, 0.931, and 0.893, respectively, which are all positive and significant contributions in the principal component 1; the load coefficients of Cu, Si, and Zn in the second principal component are 0.698, 0.699, and −0.440, respectively, and the load coefficients of Zn are negative contribution rates, which play a major role in principal component 2; in principal component 3, the load coefficients of B, Li, and Ni are 0.649, −0.356, and −0.579, playing the main roles (Table7).Table 7
Factor load matrix of principal component analysis.
Elements123Common factor varianceAl0.915−0.3130.2090.979As0.846−0.1350.1450.755B0.468−0.2540.6490.705Ca0.8320.415−0.2710.939Cr0.837−0.311−0.1930.835Cu0.6630.6980.1580.951Fe0.893−0.3110.1000.905K0.7760.1350.0140.620Li0.810−0.263−0.3560.852Mg0.8810.197−0.1800.847Mn0.8200.2520.2410.794Na0.8760.144−0.2020.829Ni0.449−0.261−0.5790.606P0.8490.185−0.1200.770Si0.5980.6990.1750.877Ti0.931−0.2990.1000.965Zn0.746−0.4400.2050.792


#### 3.3.3. Principal Component Vector

The elements Al, Fe, Mg, Na, P, and Ti play an important role in principal component 1; in principal component 2, elements Ca, Cu, Si, and Zn play an important role; in principal component 3, elements B, Li, and Ni play a main role (Table8) [16].Table 8
Principal component vector.
ElementsPrincipal componentZ1Principal componentZ2Principal componentZ3Al0.281−0.2150.182As0.260−0.0930.126B0.144−0.1750.565Ca0.2560.285−0.236Cr0.257−0.214−0.168Cu0.2040.4800.137Fe0.275−0.2140.087K0.2390.0930.012Li0.249−0.181−0.310Mg0.2710.135−0.157Mn0.2520.1730.210Na0.2690.099−0.176Ni0.138−0.179−0.504P0.2610.127−0.104Si0.1840.4800.152Ti0.286−0.2050.087Zn0.229−0.3020.178


#### 3.3.4. Calculation of Principal Component Score

According to the calculation formula of principal components, the linear combination of the three principal components and the original 17 indicators can be obtained as follows:Z1 = 0.281X1 + 0.260X2 + 0.144X3 + 0.256X4 + 0.257X5 +0.204X6 + 0.275X7 + 0.239X8 + 0.249X9 + 0.271X10 + 0.252X11 + 0.269X12 +0.138X13 +0.261X14 +0.184X15 + 0.286X16+0.229X17.Z2 = −0.215X1 − 0.093X2 − 0.175X3 + 0.285X4 − 0.214X5 +0.480X6−0.214X7 + 0.093X8 − 0.181X9+0.135X10 + 0.173X11 +0.099X12−0.179X13+0.127X14+0.480X15− 0.205X16 − 0.302X17.Z3 = 0.182X1 + 0.126X2 +0.565X3−0.236X4−0.168X5 + 0.137X6 + 0.087X7 + 0.012X8 − 0.310X9 − 0.157X10 + 0.210X11 − 0.176X12 − 0.504X13 − 0.104X14 + 0.152X15 + 0.087X16 + 0.178X17.Principal components 1 and 3 were mainly from flowers and stems ofCorydalis conspersa collected from Hainan, Huangnan, and Yushu Autonomous Prefectures; principal component 2 was mainly from flowers collected from Huangnan, Hainan, and Yushu Autonomous Prefectures; and the top five principal components were also from Huangnan, Hainan, and Yushu Autonomous Prefectures (Table 9 and Figure 3).Table 9
Principal component score.
SamplesPrincipal component 1 scorePrincipal component 2 scorePrincipal component 3 scoreComprehensive scoreRankingBHHJ-LJS-R−2.884−0.1360.132−1.80220BHHJ-LJS-S−0.9120.732−0.505−0.5166BHHJ-LJS-L−1.052−0.355−2.050−0.85914BHHJ-LJS-F7.364−2.297−3.1414.0532BHHJ-NQ-R−2.5170.0800.005−1.55618BHHJ-NQ-S−1.4330.394−0.146−0.85413BHHJ-NQ-L−1.0640.5120.000−0.5997BHHJ-NQ-F3.999−2.5300.6812.2274BHHJ-MXLC-R−1.3490.128−0.207−0.84011BHHJ-MXLC-S−1.9680.155−0.158−1.21817BHHJ-MXLC-L−1.4930.483−0.312−0.89316BHHJ-MXLC-F7.5564.8620.1665.3211BHHJ-JGS-R−1.247−0.5950.024−0.84812BHHJ-JGS-S−1.4090.3070.148−0.82710BHHJ-JGS-L−1.1440.2570.283−0.6588BHHJ-JGS-F2.828−2.2512.8271.6995BHHJ-QL-R−2.969−0.0060.144−1.83721BHHJ-QL-S−1.4520.213−0.005−0.87815BHHJ-QL-L−1.1510.0680.183−0.6949TLHJ-JGS-R−2.6470.0670.117−1.63019TLHJ-JGS-S4.945−0.0881.8143.2083


### 3.4. Cluster Analysis

Taking square Euclidean distance as the measurement criterion, the ward least variance method was used to cluster. The 21 samples were divided into three categories: the roots ofCorydalis conspersa and Corydalis linarioides from different collection areas belonged to the first group (nos. 1, 5, 9, 17, and 20), the stem and leaf of Corydalis belonged to the second category (nos. 2, 3, 6, 7, 14, 15, 18, and 19), and the flower and stems of Corydalis belong to the third category (4, 8, 12, 16, and 21), while the stems (10) and roots (13) of Corydalis conspersa are also in the first and second categories, and the leaves (11) of Corydalis conspersa are in the first category (Table 5 and Figure 4) [17, 18].Figure 4
Cluster analysis.


### 3.5. Scatter Plot of Three Principal Components in Samples

Three principal components in the sample were selected and plotted by SPSS 20.0 software. The flower (No. 4, 8, 12, and 16) ofCorydalis conspersa and stems (No. 21) of Corydalis linarioides from different collection areas are clustered and distributed in the same category containing high contents of type 1 and 3 characteristic components; and the roots, stems, and leaves of Corydalis conspersa and Corydalis linarioides from other collection areas are clustered and distributed in the same category with low contents of 1 and 2 characteristic components (Figure 5).Figure 5
Scatter plot of principal components.


## 3.1. Methodology Validation

### 3.1.1. Linear Relationship and Limit

The regression equation of trace elements has a good linear relationship withR ≥ 0.9996. The detection limits were between 0.0001 μg/g and 0.1024 μg/g. The quantitation limits were between 0.0003 μg/g and 0.3103 μg/g (Table 4).Table 4
Linear correlation and ranges and limits of trace elements reference substances.
ElementsRegression equationLinear range (μg/mL)Correlation coefficientLimit of detection (μg/g)Limit of quantitation (μg/g)AlY = 16455x + 2.44050.1–60.01.00000.00050.0015AsY = 44.772x − 1.01210.1–10.01.00000.04800.1440BY = 1817x + 0.09070.1–10.01.00000.00130.0039CaY = 15662x + 56.2190.1–100.01.00000.00010.0003CrY = 11792x − 0.02310.1–10.01.00000.00020.0006CuY = 16059x + 0.25130.1–10.01.00000.00410.0124FeY = 11077x − 3698.50.1–60.00.99990.00050.0015KY = 194954x − 3.63050.1–30.01.00000.00010.0003LiY = 1176.8x − 2.8230.1–10.01.00000.00420.0127MgY = 198929x + 12.4180.1–10.01.00000.00010.0003MnY = 54078x + 1.05990.1–10.01.00000.00010.0003NaY = 573630x + 9.33030.1–30.01.00000.00010.0003NiY = 4611.7x + 0.1030.1–10.01.00000.00030.0009PY = 212.82x − 0.01290.1–10.01.00000.10240.3103SiY = 2886.8x + 1601.60.1–30.00.99960.04290.1300TiY = 32280x − 2.96750.1–10.01.00000.00180.0054ZnY = 8430.1x + 0.41320.1–10.01.00000.00560.0170


### 3.1.2. Precision Experiment

The results showed that the average contents of Al, As, B, Ca, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, P, Si, Ti, and Zn were 1.86, 0.22, 0.04, 31.09, 0.12, 0.04, 2.13, 11.34, 0.21, 5.11, 0.08, 3.06, 0.03, 3.46, 1.67, 0.05, and 1.07 mg/g, respectively. The RSD of the contents was between 0.27% and 3.87% (n = 6).


### 3.1.3. Stability Experiment

The results showed that the content of each element was stable within 24 h after samples preparation and was detected by the conditions listed in Table3. The RSD values of various elements were between 0.35% and 4.70%.


### 3.1.4. Repeatability Experiment

The RSD values were 0.20%–3.54%, indicating that the method had good repeatability.


### 3.1.5. Sample Recovery

We acquired the average recoveries of Al, As, B, Ca, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, P, Si, Ti, and Zn were 119.83%, 121.55%, 121.77%, 104.38%, 114.67%, 120.33%, 110.31%, 104.83%, 113.16%, 117.04%, 115.57%, 111.88%, 121.83%, 113.79%, 115.74%, 108.68%, and 109.64%, respectively. The RSD values were in the range of 1.84%–3.89%.


## 3.1.1. Linear Relationship and Limit

The regression equation of trace elements has a good linear relationship withR ≥ 0.9996. The detection limits were between 0.0001 μg/g and 0.1024 μg/g. The quantitation limits were between 0.0003 μg/g and 0.3103 μg/g (Table 4).Table 4
Linear correlation and ranges and limits of trace elements reference substances.
ElementsRegression equationLinear range (μg/mL)Correlation coefficientLimit of detection (μg/g)Limit of quantitation (μg/g)AlY = 16455x + 2.44050.1–60.01.00000.00050.0015AsY = 44.772x − 1.01210.1–10.01.00000.04800.1440BY = 1817x + 0.09070.1–10.01.00000.00130.0039CaY = 15662x + 56.2190.1–100.01.00000.00010.0003CrY = 11792x − 0.02310.1–10.01.00000.00020.0006CuY = 16059x + 0.25130.1–10.01.00000.00410.0124FeY = 11077x − 3698.50.1–60.00.99990.00050.0015KY = 194954x − 3.63050.1–30.01.00000.00010.0003LiY = 1176.8x − 2.8230.1–10.01.00000.00420.0127MgY = 198929x + 12.4180.1–10.01.00000.00010.0003MnY = 54078x + 1.05990.1–10.01.00000.00010.0003NaY = 573630x + 9.33030.1–30.01.00000.00010.0003NiY = 4611.7x + 0.1030.1–10.01.00000.00030.0009PY = 212.82x − 0.01290.1–10.01.00000.10240.3103SiY = 2886.8x + 1601.60.1–30.00.99960.04290.1300TiY = 32280x − 2.96750.1–10.01.00000.00180.0054ZnY = 8430.1x + 0.41320.1–10.01.00000.00560.0170


## 3.1.2. Precision Experiment

The results showed that the average contents of Al, As, B, Ca, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, P, Si, Ti, and Zn were 1.86, 0.22, 0.04, 31.09, 0.12, 0.04, 2.13, 11.34, 0.21, 5.11, 0.08, 3.06, 0.03, 3.46, 1.67, 0.05, and 1.07 mg/g, respectively. The RSD of the contents was between 0.27% and 3.87% (n = 6).


## 3.1.3. Stability Experiment

The results showed that the content of each element was stable within 24 h after samples preparation and was detected by the conditions listed in Table3. The RSD values of various elements were between 0.35% and 4.70%.


## 3.1.4. Repeatability Experiment

The RSD values were 0.20%–3.54%, indicating that the method had good repeatability.


## 3.1.5. Sample Recovery

We acquired the average recoveries of Al, As, B, Ca, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, P, Si, Ti, and Zn were 119.83%, 121.55%, 121.77%, 104.38%, 114.67%, 120.33%, 110.31%, 104.83%, 113.16%, 117.04%, 115.57%, 111.88%, 121.83%, 113.79%, 115.74%, 108.68%, and 109.64%, respectively. The RSD values were in the range of 1.84%–3.89%.


## 3.2. Content of Different Elements in Medicinal Materials

### 3.2.1. Samples from Different Areas and Tissues

In order to study the specific content of different elements in the collection areas and tissues, a three-dimensional characterization map was drawn for the detection of element content. It showed that the higher contents of different elements in roots, stems, leaves, and flowers in different collection areas were Al, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Na, and P. The contents of elements in different tissues were as follows: flowers > leaves > stems > roots. The contents of elements in flowers of Maixiu Forest Farm from Henan County of Huangnan Prefecture were highest than those in other areas. However, the contents of different elements As, B, Cr, Cu, Li, Mn, Ni, Si, Ti, and Zn were lower in the plants (Table5 and Figure 2).Table 5
Determination results of trace elements from drugs ofCorydalis conspersa and Corydalis linarioides (μg/g, n = 3).
Area and no. of tissuesContents of different elements (μg/g)AlAsBCaCrCuFeKLiMgMnNaNiPSiTiZnBHHJ-LJS-R0.15900.01980.00142.58340.00630.00180.22151.18360.01771.03540.01010.33790.00460.54280.02130.00390.0440BHHJ-LJS-S0.29390.00160.019243.07780.01540.01240.36695.53440.02183.56960.09216.62190.01251.58560.06100.01020.0843BHHJ-LJS-L0.15850.01560.029620.35130.01540.00640.48385.03120.03003.38290.03833.55760.08811.38690.05570.00720.0705BHHJ-LJS-F2.01680.09590.079573.31820.20630.06963.317413.69370.64078.11140.114929.83390.06853.87600.23040.06500.5812BHHJ-NQ-R0.09640.00670.01995.77550.01030.00450.20161.64110.02432.34800.01400.32900.00311.23150.11710.00350.0738BHHJ-NQ-S0.26880.00950.020816.07050.01640.00380.328110.27570.02293.35680.02350.32470.00441.79990.04710.00690.0604BHHJ-NQ-L0.36660.00580.062326.06270.01310.00880.37499.13700.02143.79960.04992.43360.00381.76510.22010.01120.0595BHHJ-NQ-F1.79070.19440.031225.11300.11010.03532.045110.64360.12264.88970.08493.14780.02543.14201.13690.05951.2251BHHJ-MXLC-R0.44140.00780.01166.15230.03630.01430.87422.84080.00541.86210.02420.34010.02342.29525.76010.00950.1145BHHJ-MXLC-S0.18490.01540.022218.69120.01530.00850.29155.23150.01801.80950.03680.39140.01261.15730.01310.00650.0578BHHJ-MXLC-L0.28620.01050.023821.09560.01660.00960.40385.33250.01292.10060.03960.37800.02781.13975.82710.01020.0758BHHJ-MXLC-F1.35220.12620.1055100.09320.08471.69892.164215.92340.17809.87880.223824.34290.01885.070623.88750.04510.3493BHHJ-JGS-R0.21700.01310.07228.91430.10310.00801.47774.07400.02102.40970.02420.22030.00551.48920.03370.00510.0823BHHJ-JGS-S0.16290.00500.074417.88590.03020.00440.616211.58550.00452.35960.02690.33640.00271.70580.05930.00540.0419BHHJ-JGS-L0.31590.00830.094420.98430.02490.00710.71288.65520.01253.27740.05190.16900.00281.76660.08880.00860.0702BHHJ-JGS-F1.88680.04690.591216.19900.05140.02772.95169.86180.09415.00480.08682.89240.01622.57251.03060.05250.5076BHHJ-QL-R0.04130.00860.00632.72900.00300.00290.13020.96690.01290.97830.00860.17130.00230.94760.15340.00140.0949BHHJ-QL-S0.34340.00840.016617.87690.00800.00820.65619.54230.02072.36540.03220.26060.00641.57250.01730.01080.0742BHHJ-QL-L0.65400.01140.054919.60200.00610.00780.79497.32280.01772.93790.05000.36880.00921.62960.03220.01440.0496TLHJ-JGS-R0.15510.00540.00657.17420.01420.00510.22831.81520.03020.89330.02322.18490.00350.55311.57280.00470.0628TLHJ-JGS-S1.77780.12140.366736.14620.11960.69101.93159.93610.27592.96960.293425.57910.02811.354110.03150.04060.5851Figure 2
Contents of diverse elements from the different areas and tissues. Note: BHHJ-LJS-R/S/L/F: root, stem, leaf, and flower of Guide County from Hainan Autonomous Prefecture ofCorydalis conspersa; BHHJ-NQ-R/S/L/F: root, stem, leaf, and flower of Nangqian County from Yushu Autonomous Prefecture of Corydalis conspersa; BHHJ-MXLC-R/S/L/F: root, stem, leaf, and flower of Zeku County from Huangnan Autonomous Prefecture of Corydalis conspersa; BHHJ-JGS-R/S/L/F: root, stem, leaf, and flower of Henan County from Huangnan Autonomous Prefecture of Corydalis conspersa; BHHJ-QL-R/S/L: root, stem, and leaf of Qilian County from Haibei Autonomous Prefecture of Corydalis conspersa; TLHJ-JGS-R/S: root and stem of Henan County from Huangnan Autonomous Prefecture of Corydalis linarioides.


### 3.2.2. Accumulation Contents from Different Areas and Tissues

The accumulation of various elements in different parts of each collection area was the highest in flowers: Zeku County > Guide County > Nangqian County > Henan County; the stems and leaves were the second, and the roots were the lowest. The results showed that the accumulation of various elements in the flowers: Maixiu Forest Farm from Henan County of Huangnan Prefecture (185.54μg/g), was the highest, Guide County (136.32 μg/g) and Qilian County (53.80 μg/g) were the second, and Ji Gang Mountain (43.87 μg/g) from Henan County of Huangnan Prefecture was the lowest. The accumulation of various elements in the leaves: Nangqian County (44.40 μg/g), was the highest. The accumulation of various elements in the stems: Henan County of Huangnan Prefecture (92.25 μg/g), was the highest. The accumulation of various elements in the roots: Henan County of Huangnan Prefecture (20.81 μg/g and 19.17 μg/g), was the highest (Table 5 and Figure 3).Figure 3
Accumulation content of elements from the different areas and tissues (note: the same as the Figure2).According to the analysis of the whole element accumulation contents, the accumulation content of elements in different tissues of collection areas was higher as follows: Nangqian County of Yushu Prefecture, Henan County of Huangnan Prefecture, Qilian County of Haibei Prefecture, and Guide County of Hainan Prefecture, while those of flowers > stems > leaves > roots. The amount of flower (43.87μg/g − 185.54 μg/g) was the highest; the root (6.19 μg/g − 11.90 μg/g) was the lowest, and the leaf (33.56 μg/g − 44.40 μg/g) and the stem (27.96 μg/g − 92.25 μg/g) were higher in the Guide County from Hainan Autonomous Prefecture of Corydalis conspersa (Table 5 and Figure 3).


## 3.2.1. Samples from Different Areas and Tissues

In order to study the specific content of different elements in the collection areas and tissues, a three-dimensional characterization map was drawn for the detection of element content. It showed that the higher contents of different elements in roots, stems, leaves, and flowers in different collection areas were Al, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Na, and P. The contents of elements in different tissues were as follows: flowers > leaves > stems > roots. The contents of elements in flowers of Maixiu Forest Farm from Henan County of Huangnan Prefecture were highest than those in other areas. However, the contents of different elements As, B, Cr, Cu, Li, Mn, Ni, Si, Ti, and Zn were lower in the plants (Table5 and Figure 2).Table 5
Determination results of trace elements from drugs ofCorydalis conspersa and Corydalis linarioides (μg/g, n = 3).
Area and no. of tissuesContents of different elements (μg/g)AlAsBCaCrCuFeKLiMgMnNaNiPSiTiZnBHHJ-LJS-R0.15900.01980.00142.58340.00630.00180.22151.18360.01771.03540.01010.33790.00460.54280.02130.00390.0440BHHJ-LJS-S0.29390.00160.019243.07780.01540.01240.36695.53440.02183.56960.09216.62190.01251.58560.06100.01020.0843BHHJ-LJS-L0.15850.01560.029620.35130.01540.00640.48385.03120.03003.38290.03833.55760.08811.38690.05570.00720.0705BHHJ-LJS-F2.01680.09590.079573.31820.20630.06963.317413.69370.64078.11140.114929.83390.06853.87600.23040.06500.5812BHHJ-NQ-R0.09640.00670.01995.77550.01030.00450.20161.64110.02432.34800.01400.32900.00311.23150.11710.00350.0738BHHJ-NQ-S0.26880.00950.020816.07050.01640.00380.328110.27570.02293.35680.02350.32470.00441.79990.04710.00690.0604BHHJ-NQ-L0.36660.00580.062326.06270.01310.00880.37499.13700.02143.79960.04992.43360.00381.76510.22010.01120.0595BHHJ-NQ-F1.79070.19440.031225.11300.11010.03532.045110.64360.12264.88970.08493.14780.02543.14201.13690.05951.2251BHHJ-MXLC-R0.44140.00780.01166.15230.03630.01430.87422.84080.00541.86210.02420.34010.02342.29525.76010.00950.1145BHHJ-MXLC-S0.18490.01540.022218.69120.01530.00850.29155.23150.01801.80950.03680.39140.01261.15730.01310.00650.0578BHHJ-MXLC-L0.28620.01050.023821.09560.01660.00960.40385.33250.01292.10060.03960.37800.02781.13975.82710.01020.0758BHHJ-MXLC-F1.35220.12620.1055100.09320.08471.69892.164215.92340.17809.87880.223824.34290.01885.070623.88750.04510.3493BHHJ-JGS-R0.21700.01310.07228.91430.10310.00801.47774.07400.02102.40970.02420.22030.00551.48920.03370.00510.0823BHHJ-JGS-S0.16290.00500.074417.88590.03020.00440.616211.58550.00452.35960.02690.33640.00271.70580.05930.00540.0419BHHJ-JGS-L0.31590.00830.094420.98430.02490.00710.71288.65520.01253.27740.05190.16900.00281.76660.08880.00860.0702BHHJ-JGS-F1.88680.04690.591216.19900.05140.02772.95169.86180.09415.00480.08682.89240.01622.57251.03060.05250.5076BHHJ-QL-R0.04130.00860.00632.72900.00300.00290.13020.96690.01290.97830.00860.17130.00230.94760.15340.00140.0949BHHJ-QL-S0.34340.00840.016617.87690.00800.00820.65619.54230.02072.36540.03220.26060.00641.57250.01730.01080.0742BHHJ-QL-L0.65400.01140.054919.60200.00610.00780.79497.32280.01772.93790.05000.36880.00921.62960.03220.01440.0496TLHJ-JGS-R0.15510.00540.00657.17420.01420.00510.22831.81520.03020.89330.02322.18490.00350.55311.57280.00470.0628TLHJ-JGS-S1.77780.12140.366736.14620.11960.69101.93159.93610.27592.96960.293425.57910.02811.354110.03150.04060.5851Figure 2
Contents of diverse elements from the different areas and tissues. Note: BHHJ-LJS-R/S/L/F: root, stem, leaf, and flower of Guide County from Hainan Autonomous Prefecture ofCorydalis conspersa; BHHJ-NQ-R/S/L/F: root, stem, leaf, and flower of Nangqian County from Yushu Autonomous Prefecture of Corydalis conspersa; BHHJ-MXLC-R/S/L/F: root, stem, leaf, and flower of Zeku County from Huangnan Autonomous Prefecture of Corydalis conspersa; BHHJ-JGS-R/S/L/F: root, stem, leaf, and flower of Henan County from Huangnan Autonomous Prefecture of Corydalis conspersa; BHHJ-QL-R/S/L: root, stem, and leaf of Qilian County from Haibei Autonomous Prefecture of Corydalis conspersa; TLHJ-JGS-R/S: root and stem of Henan County from Huangnan Autonomous Prefecture of Corydalis linarioides.


## 3.2.2. Accumulation Contents from Different Areas and Tissues

The accumulation of various elements in different parts of each collection area was the highest in flowers: Zeku County > Guide County > Nangqian County > Henan County; the stems and leaves were the second, and the roots were the lowest. The results showed that the accumulation of various elements in the flowers: Maixiu Forest Farm from Henan County of Huangnan Prefecture (185.54μg/g), was the highest, Guide County (136.32 μg/g) and Qilian County (53.80 μg/g) were the second, and Ji Gang Mountain (43.87 μg/g) from Henan County of Huangnan Prefecture was the lowest. The accumulation of various elements in the leaves: Nangqian County (44.40 μg/g), was the highest. The accumulation of various elements in the stems: Henan County of Huangnan Prefecture (92.25 μg/g), was the highest. The accumulation of various elements in the roots: Henan County of Huangnan Prefecture (20.81 μg/g and 19.17 μg/g), was the highest (Table 5 and Figure 3).Figure 3
Accumulation content of elements from the different areas and tissues (note: the same as the Figure2).According to the analysis of the whole element accumulation contents, the accumulation content of elements in different tissues of collection areas was higher as follows: Nangqian County of Yushu Prefecture, Henan County of Huangnan Prefecture, Qilian County of Haibei Prefecture, and Guide County of Hainan Prefecture, while those of flowers > stems > leaves > roots. The amount of flower (43.87μg/g − 185.54 μg/g) was the highest; the root (6.19 μg/g − 11.90 μg/g) was the lowest, and the leaf (33.56 μg/g − 44.40 μg/g) and the stem (27.96 μg/g − 92.25 μg/g) were higher in the Guide County from Hainan Autonomous Prefecture of Corydalis conspersa (Table 5 and Figure 3).


## 3.3. Analysis of Principal Components [14, 15]

### 3.3.1. Eigenvalues and Contribution Rate of Principal Components

In the results of principal component analysis, the KMO value is 0.647 > 0.6, which indicates that factor analysis is suitable and significance value in the sphericity test is 0.000 < 0.05 (significant level), indicating that there is correlation among variables and factor analysis. We can know the description of the original variables by the initial solution in the process of principal component analysis. The cumulative contribution rate of the total variance from three principal components is 82.46%, which means that the mathematical model established by the extracted three factors can clarify 82.46% of the experimental data. The contribution rate of principal component 1 is about 62%, which is more than half of the cumulative contribution rate of the whole principal component (Table6).Table 6
Eigenvalue and variance contribution rate of principal component analysis.
Principle componentEigenvalueContribution (%)Accumulating contribution (%)110.58062.23662.23622.11712.45474.69131.3217.77282.46340.9195.40587.86850.8054.73892.60660.5353.14695.75270.3432.01797.76980.1670.98398.75390.0870.51299.265100.0540.31999.583110.0320.18899.771120.0210.12199.892130.0120.07299.964140.0030.02199.984150.0020.01199.996160.0010.00399.999170.0000.001100.000


### 3.3.2. Factor Load Matrix of Principal Component Analysis

The loading coefficients of Al, Ti, and Fe in the first principal component are 0.915, 0.931, and 0.893, respectively, which are all positive and significant contributions in the principal component 1; the load coefficients of Cu, Si, and Zn in the second principal component are 0.698, 0.699, and −0.440, respectively, and the load coefficients of Zn are negative contribution rates, which play a major role in principal component 2; in principal component 3, the load coefficients of B, Li, and Ni are 0.649, −0.356, and −0.579, playing the main roles (Table7).Table 7
Factor load matrix of principal component analysis.
Elements123Common factor varianceAl0.915−0.3130.2090.979As0.846−0.1350.1450.755B0.468−0.2540.6490.705Ca0.8320.415−0.2710.939Cr0.837−0.311−0.1930.835Cu0.6630.6980.1580.951Fe0.893−0.3110.1000.905K0.7760.1350.0140.620Li0.810−0.263−0.3560.852Mg0.8810.197−0.1800.847Mn0.8200.2520.2410.794Na0.8760.144−0.2020.829Ni0.449−0.261−0.5790.606P0.8490.185−0.1200.770Si0.5980.6990.1750.877Ti0.931−0.2990.1000.965Zn0.746−0.4400.2050.792


### 3.3.3. Principal Component Vector

The elements Al, Fe, Mg, Na, P, and Ti play an important role in principal component 1; in principal component 2, elements Ca, Cu, Si, and Zn play an important role; in principal component 3, elements B, Li, and Ni play a main role (Table8) [16].Table 8
Principal component vector.
ElementsPrincipal componentZ1Principal componentZ2Principal componentZ3Al0.281−0.2150.182As0.260−0.0930.126B0.144−0.1750.565Ca0.2560.285−0.236Cr0.257−0.214−0.168Cu0.2040.4800.137Fe0.275−0.2140.087K0.2390.0930.012Li0.249−0.181−0.310Mg0.2710.135−0.157Mn0.2520.1730.210Na0.2690.099−0.176Ni0.138−0.179−0.504P0.2610.127−0.104Si0.1840.4800.152Ti0.286−0.2050.087Zn0.229−0.3020.178


### 3.3.4. Calculation of Principal Component Score

According to the calculation formula of principal components, the linear combination of the three principal components and the original 17 indicators can be obtained as follows:Z1 = 0.281X1 + 0.260X2 + 0.144X3 + 0.256X4 + 0.257X5 +0.204X6 + 0.275X7 + 0.239X8 + 0.249X9 + 0.271X10 + 0.252X11 + 0.269X12 +0.138X13 +0.261X14 +0.184X15 + 0.286X16+0.229X17.Z2 = −0.215X1 − 0.093X2 − 0.175X3 + 0.285X4 − 0.214X5 +0.480X6−0.214X7 + 0.093X8 − 0.181X9+0.135X10 + 0.173X11 +0.099X12−0.179X13+0.127X14+0.480X15− 0.205X16 − 0.302X17.Z3 = 0.182X1 + 0.126X2 +0.565X3−0.236X4−0.168X5 + 0.137X6 + 0.087X7 + 0.012X8 − 0.310X9 − 0.157X10 + 0.210X11 − 0.176X12 − 0.504X13 − 0.104X14 + 0.152X15 + 0.087X16 + 0.178X17.Principal components 1 and 3 were mainly from flowers and stems ofCorydalis conspersa collected from Hainan, Huangnan, and Yushu Autonomous Prefectures; principal component 2 was mainly from flowers collected from Huangnan, Hainan, and Yushu Autonomous Prefectures; and the top five principal components were also from Huangnan, Hainan, and Yushu Autonomous Prefectures (Table 9 and Figure 3).Table 9
Principal component score.
SamplesPrincipal component 1 scorePrincipal component 2 scorePrincipal component 3 scoreComprehensive scoreRankingBHHJ-LJS-R−2.884−0.1360.132−1.80220BHHJ-LJS-S−0.9120.732−0.505−0.5166BHHJ-LJS-L−1.052−0.355−2.050−0.85914BHHJ-LJS-F7.364−2.297−3.1414.0532BHHJ-NQ-R−2.5170.0800.005−1.55618BHHJ-NQ-S−1.4330.394−0.146−0.85413BHHJ-NQ-L−1.0640.5120.000−0.5997BHHJ-NQ-F3.999−2.5300.6812.2274BHHJ-MXLC-R−1.3490.128−0.207−0.84011BHHJ-MXLC-S−1.9680.155−0.158−1.21817BHHJ-MXLC-L−1.4930.483−0.312−0.89316BHHJ-MXLC-F7.5564.8620.1665.3211BHHJ-JGS-R−1.247−0.5950.024−0.84812BHHJ-JGS-S−1.4090.3070.148−0.82710BHHJ-JGS-L−1.1440.2570.283−0.6588BHHJ-JGS-F2.828−2.2512.8271.6995BHHJ-QL-R−2.969−0.0060.144−1.83721BHHJ-QL-S−1.4520.213−0.005−0.87815BHHJ-QL-L−1.1510.0680.183−0.6949TLHJ-JGS-R−2.6470.0670.117−1.63019TLHJ-JGS-S4.945−0.0881.8143.2083


## 3.3.1. Eigenvalues and Contribution Rate of Principal Components

In the results of principal component analysis, the KMO value is 0.647 > 0.6, which indicates that factor analysis is suitable and significance value in the sphericity test is 0.000 < 0.05 (significant level), indicating that there is correlation among variables and factor analysis. We can know the description of the original variables by the initial solution in the process of principal component analysis. The cumulative contribution rate of the total variance from three principal components is 82.46%, which means that the mathematical model established by the extracted three factors can clarify 82.46% of the experimental data. The contribution rate of principal component 1 is about 62%, which is more than half of the cumulative contribution rate of the whole principal component (Table6).Table 6
Eigenvalue and variance contribution rate of principal component analysis.
Principle componentEigenvalueContribution (%)Accumulating contribution (%)110.58062.23662.23622.11712.45474.69131.3217.77282.46340.9195.40587.86850.8054.73892.60660.5353.14695.75270.3432.01797.76980.1670.98398.75390.0870.51299.265100.0540.31999.583110.0320.18899.771120.0210.12199.892130.0120.07299.964140.0030.02199.984150.0020.01199.996160.0010.00399.999170.0000.001100.000


## 3.3.2. Factor Load Matrix of Principal Component Analysis

The loading coefficients of Al, Ti, and Fe in the first principal component are 0.915, 0.931, and 0.893, respectively, which are all positive and significant contributions in the principal component 1; the load coefficients of Cu, Si, and Zn in the second principal component are 0.698, 0.699, and −0.440, respectively, and the load coefficients of Zn are negative contribution rates, which play a major role in principal component 2; in principal component 3, the load coefficients of B, Li, and Ni are 0.649, −0.356, and −0.579, playing the main roles (Table7).Table 7
Factor load matrix of principal component analysis.
Elements123Common factor varianceAl0.915−0.3130.2090.979As0.846−0.1350.1450.755B0.468−0.2540.6490.705Ca0.8320.415−0.2710.939Cr0.837−0.311−0.1930.835Cu0.6630.6980.1580.951Fe0.893−0.3110.1000.905K0.7760.1350.0140.620Li0.810−0.263−0.3560.852Mg0.8810.197−0.1800.847Mn0.8200.2520.2410.794Na0.8760.144−0.2020.829Ni0.449−0.261−0.5790.606P0.8490.185−0.1200.770Si0.5980.6990.1750.877Ti0.931−0.2990.1000.965Zn0.746−0.4400.2050.792


## 3.3.3. Principal Component Vector

The elements Al, Fe, Mg, Na, P, and Ti play an important role in principal component 1; in principal component 2, elements Ca, Cu, Si, and Zn play an important role; in principal component 3, elements B, Li, and Ni play a main role (Table8) [16].Table 8
Principal component vector.
ElementsPrincipal componentZ1Principal componentZ2Principal componentZ3Al0.281−0.2150.182As0.260−0.0930.126B0.144−0.1750.565Ca0.2560.285−0.236Cr0.257−0.214−0.168Cu0.2040.4800.137Fe0.275−0.2140.087K0.2390.0930.012Li0.249−0.181−0.310Mg0.2710.135−0.157Mn0.2520.1730.210Na0.2690.099−0.176Ni0.138−0.179−0.504P0.2610.127−0.104Si0.1840.4800.152Ti0.286−0.2050.087Zn0.229−0.3020.178


## 3.3.4. Calculation of Principal Component Score

According to the calculation formula of principal components, the linear combination of the three principal components and the original 17 indicators can be obtained as follows:Z1 = 0.281X1 + 0.260X2 + 0.144X3 + 0.256X4 + 0.257X5 +0.204X6 + 0.275X7 + 0.239X8 + 0.249X9 + 0.271X10 + 0.252X11 + 0.269X12 +0.138X13 +0.261X14 +0.184X15 + 0.286X16+0.229X17.Z2 = −0.215X1 − 0.093X2 − 0.175X3 + 0.285X4 − 0.214X5 +0.480X6−0.214X7 + 0.093X8 − 0.181X9+0.135X10 + 0.173X11 +0.099X12−0.179X13+0.127X14+0.480X15− 0.205X16 − 0.302X17.Z3 = 0.182X1 + 0.126X2 +0.565X3−0.236X4−0.168X5 + 0.137X6 + 0.087X7 + 0.012X8 − 0.310X9 − 0.157X10 + 0.210X11 − 0.176X12 − 0.504X13 − 0.104X14 + 0.152X15 + 0.087X16 + 0.178X17.Principal components 1 and 3 were mainly from flowers and stems ofCorydalis conspersa collected from Hainan, Huangnan, and Yushu Autonomous Prefectures; principal component 2 was mainly from flowers collected from Huangnan, Hainan, and Yushu Autonomous Prefectures; and the top five principal components were also from Huangnan, Hainan, and Yushu Autonomous Prefectures (Table 9 and Figure 3).Table 9
Principal component score.
SamplesPrincipal component 1 scorePrincipal component 2 scorePrincipal component 3 scoreComprehensive scoreRankingBHHJ-LJS-R−2.884−0.1360.132−1.80220BHHJ-LJS-S−0.9120.732−0.505−0.5166BHHJ-LJS-L−1.052−0.355−2.050−0.85914BHHJ-LJS-F7.364−2.297−3.1414.0532BHHJ-NQ-R−2.5170.0800.005−1.55618BHHJ-NQ-S−1.4330.394−0.146−0.85413BHHJ-NQ-L−1.0640.5120.000−0.5997BHHJ-NQ-F3.999−2.5300.6812.2274BHHJ-MXLC-R−1.3490.128−0.207−0.84011BHHJ-MXLC-S−1.9680.155−0.158−1.21817BHHJ-MXLC-L−1.4930.483−0.312−0.89316BHHJ-MXLC-F7.5564.8620.1665.3211BHHJ-JGS-R−1.247−0.5950.024−0.84812BHHJ-JGS-S−1.4090.3070.148−0.82710BHHJ-JGS-L−1.1440.2570.283−0.6588BHHJ-JGS-F2.828−2.2512.8271.6995BHHJ-QL-R−2.969−0.0060.144−1.83721BHHJ-QL-S−1.4520.213−0.005−0.87815BHHJ-QL-L−1.1510.0680.183−0.6949TLHJ-JGS-R−2.6470.0670.117−1.63019TLHJ-JGS-S4.945−0.0881.8143.2083


## 3.4. Cluster Analysis

Taking square Euclidean distance as the measurement criterion, the ward least variance method was used to cluster. The 21 samples were divided into three categories: the roots ofCorydalis conspersa and Corydalis linarioides from different collection areas belonged to the first group (nos. 1, 5, 9, 17, and 20), the stem and leaf of Corydalis belonged to the second category (nos. 2, 3, 6, 7, 14, 15, 18, and 19), and the flower and stems of Corydalis belong to the third category (4, 8, 12, 16, and 21), while the stems (10) and roots (13) of Corydalis conspersa are also in the first and second categories, and the leaves (11) of Corydalis conspersa are in the first category (Table 5 and Figure 4) [17, 18].Figure 4
Cluster analysis.


## 3.5. Scatter Plot of Three Principal Components in Samples

Three principal components in the sample were selected and plotted by SPSS 20.0 software. The flower (No. 4, 8, 12, and 16) ofCorydalis conspersa and stems (No. 21) of Corydalis linarioides from different collection areas are clustered and distributed in the same category containing high contents of type 1 and 3 characteristic components; and the roots, stems, and leaves of Corydalis conspersa and Corydalis linarioides from other collection areas are clustered and distributed in the same category with low contents of 1 and 2 characteristic components (Figure 5).Figure 5
Scatter plot of principal components.


## 4. Conclusions

An suitable, precise, and selective ICP-AES method for the simultaneous determination of trace elements has been developed and validated from the TCM ofCorydalis conspersa and Corydalis linarioides. According to the green industry standard for foreign trade and economic cooperation of medicinal plants and preparations issued by China in 2005 [19], the total amount of heavy metals should be less than or equal to 20.0 mg•kg−1 and the content of Pb ≤ 5.0 mg•kg−1, Cd ≤ 0.3 mg•kg−1, Cu ≤ 20.0 mg•kg−1, As ≤ 2.0 mg•kg−1, and Hg ≤ 0.2 mg•kg−1. The content ranges of copper, arsenic, and chromium were 0.0018−1.6989 mg • kg−1, 0.0016−0.1944 mg • kg−1, and 0.0030−0.2063 mg • kg−1, respectively. They all comply with the limit range of heavy metal. It showed that the growth and ecological environment of the medicinal materials were good and no pollution. The contents of elements have the great significance within the aspects of the plant physiology, the structure and efficacy of medicinal materials, and the ecological environment [20]. This research can provide a determination basis of trace elements in Corydalis conspersa and Corydalis linarioides so as to reveal the relationship between the functions of trace elements and plant growth through the further researches.



---

*Source: 6567015-2020-10-26.xml*