# Inhibitive Action of Ferrous Gluconate on Aluminum Alloy in Saline Environment

Authors: Patricia Abimbola Idowu Popoola; Sanni Omotayo; Cleophas A. Loto; Olawale Muhammed Popoola
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

The corrosion of aluminum in saline environment in the presence of ferrous gluconate was studied using weight loss and linear polarization methods. The corrosion rates were studied in different concentrations of ferrous gluconate 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 g/mL at 28°C. Experimental results revealed that ferrous gluconate in saline environment reduced the corrosion rate of aluminum alloy at the different concentrations studied. The minimum inhibition efficiency was obtained at 1.5 g/mL concentration of inhibitor while the optimum inhibition efficiency was achieved with 1.0 g/mL inhibitor concentration. The results showed that adsorption of ferrous gluconate on the aluminium alloy surface fits Langmuir adsorption isotherm. The potentiodynamic polarization results showed that ferrous gluconate is a mixed type inhibitor. Ferrous gluconate acted as an effective inhibitor for aluminium alloy within the temperature and concentration range studied. The data obtained from weight loss and potentiodynamic polarization methods were in good agreement.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Aluminum and its alloys are known to be used in industries due to their weight-to-strength ratios, good resistance to corrosion, excellent workability, and high electrical conductivity [1–4]. In spite of these attractive properties of aluminum, in the presence of aggressive ions, like chloride, the protective layer can be locally destroyed and corrosive attack takes place [5, 6]. Corrosion control and prevention are unavoidable major scientific issues that must be addressed daily as far as there are increasing applications of metallic materials in all facets of technological development [7]. The main corrosion issue with aluminum and its alloys is the localized breakdown of the passive film, which leads to the initiation and growth of corrosion pits in chloride medium [8–10]. Corrosion can be prevented by appropriate modifications of the environment which in turn suppress, retard, or completely stop the cathodic or anodic reactions or both. This can be achieved by the use of inhibitors [11–13]. Corrosion inhibitors are substances which when added in small concentrations to corrosive environments decrease or prevent the reaction of the metal with the media. Inhibitors are added to many systems such as refinery units, cooling systems, pipelines, oil and gas production units [14]. Due to the various economic importance and industrial applications of aluminum and its alloys, its protection against corrosion has attracted much attention [15–22]. The authors [23] studied the corrosion inhibition of aluminum alloy in 2 M HCl and HNO3 with Arachis hypogaeanatural oil as an inhibitor using potentiodynamic polarization and gravimetric techniques at 25°C. The obtained results showed that Arachis hypogaeaoil in 2 M HCl and HNO3- solutions decreased the corrosion rate of aluminum alloy at different concentrations of inhibitor considered; the scanning electron microscope surface morphology of as-corroded uninhibited condition showed severe pits and damage formation than those of as-corroded inhibited conditions. The authors concluded that additions of Arachis hypogaeaas corrosion inhibitor for aluminum alloy indicate a high inhibition efficiency, potential value, and polarization resistance with decrease in current density. The authors of [24] studied the interfacial behavior of fluconazole (FLC) as a corrosion inhibitor for aluminum in hydrochloric acid solution between hydrochloric acid and aluminum using weight loss method. The experimental results revealed that fluconazole exhibits an excellent corrosion inhibitor property for aluminum in hydrochloric acidic medium. The authors of [25] worked on the effect of solution pH on the anticorrosion performance of different inhibitors K2Cr2O7, CeCl3, and Ce(dbp)3 on aluminum alloy (AA2024-T3) using the multielectrode and conventional potentiodynamic polarization methods. The results showed that the K2Cr2O7 at 10−4 M after 30 min of exposure time behaves as the best inhibitor across the studied pH range. The authors of [26] worked on the influence of bromide and iodide ions on the inhibitive effect of polyacrylamide (PA) on aluminum corrosion in HCl solution using weight loss, hydrogen evolution, and thermometric techniques at 30 and 60°C. The experimental results show that the halide additives synergistically increased the inhibition efficiency of polyacrylamide and the increase in inhibition efficiency was found to be more obvious in iodide than bromide ions.Gluconic acid occurs naturally in honey, fruit, kombucha tea, and wine [27]. They are environmentally suitable nontoxic compounds, and gluconates are part of the successful commercial corrosion inhibitors. Gluconic acid and its derivatives are used as ingredients in various hygienic products, for scale removal in metal cleanings, as household cleaning compounds including mouth washer, metal finishing, and for water treatment operation. Sodium, calcium, and zinc salts of gluconic acid have been reported to be effective nontoxic inhibitors for tin, iron, and mild steel in near neutral solution [27–29]. The efficiency of gluconate inhibition depends on pH value, inhibitor concentration, chemical composition of investigated solution, the nature of cations introduced in the solution as gluconate and the state of the metal surface [30]. Different mechanisms of corrosion inhibition by gluconate were proposed. It is speculated that gluconate can repair the oxide film by its adsorption on the exposed metal surface in weak spots of porous oxide film. Gluconates can be incorporated in the oxide film during its formation and/or gluconate are forming more or less soluble complexes that can be precipitated on the metal surface [30]. In view of this, it is essential to study the corrosion behavior of aluminum in ferrous gluconate solution. The present study aimed at evaluating the potential of ferrous gluconate as an inhibitor for aluminum alloy in saline medium using weight loss and potentiodynamic polarization methods.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Materials and Sample Preparation

Aluminum alloy with the chemical composition presented in Table1 was used as substrate material for weight loss and potentiodynamic polarization studies. The aluminum alloy plate was cut using a Struers cutting machine with a Discotom-5 cut-off wheel. A Struers lubricant which works as a coolant was used during cutting. The substrate was cut and machined to dimensions 12 × 12 × 12 mm. The aggressive solution of sodium chloride purchased from SMM Instruments (Pty) Ltd, South Africa, was used for this study. The chemical structure of ferrous gluconate is shown in Figure 1 purchased from SMM Instruments (Pty) Ltd, South Africa. An insulated copper wire was connected to one side of the sample using an aluminum conducting tape and cold mounted in methyl methacrylate resin leaving one surface of an area of 1 cm2 for potentiodynamic polarization measurement; the exposed surface area was abraded with different grates of emery papers, degreased with acetone, rinsed in distilled water, dried, weighed, and stored in a desiccator. The initial weight of the samples was taken and recorded. In each experiment, 0.05 M NaCl solution was prepared freshly as required. Corrosion studies were carried out at 28°C.Table 1
Chemical composition of aluminium alloy (%wt).
Si
Fe
Cu
Mn
Mg
Cr
Ti
Ca
Zr
V
Al
0.157
0.282
0.0025
0.024
0.51
0.023
0.006
0.0011
0.002
0.0035
BalanceFigure 1
Molecular structure of ferrous gluconate.


### 2.2. Weight Loss Measurement

The weight loss test was conducted on the aluminum alloy weighed samples in the absence and presence of different concentrations of inhibitor at 28°C. Volume of the solution used was 200 mL and the concentration of the inhibitor was in the range of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 g/mL in saline environment. The samples were washed with distilled water, dried in acetone, and weighed at an interval of 48 hours of immersion time. Corrosion rate, degree of surface coverage, and inhibitor efficiency were determined for each inhibitor concentration using the following equations:(1)Corrosionrate(mmyr)=87.6WDAT,
where W is weight loss (mg), D is specimen density (g/cm3), A is specimen area (cm2), and T is exposure time (hour)
(2)Degreeofsurfacecoverage(θ)=CR°-CRCR°Percentageinhibitionefficiency(IE)=(CR°-CRCR°)×100,
where CR and CR° are the corrosion rates of the specimens in the presence and absence of inhibitor, respectively.


### 2.3. Potentiodynamic Polarization Measurements

Potentiodynamic polarization tests were carried out using three electrode glass cells with an AUTOLAB Potentiostat (model Reference-668) which was connected to a personal computer to control the experiments. A graphite rod, saturated Ag/AgCl, and aluminum alloy specimen were used as counter, reference, and working electrode respectively. The polarization experiments data were analyzed by NOVA software version 1.8. The polarization curves were carried out with −1.5 V cathodic potential and +1.5 V anodic potential at a scan rate of 0.0016 V/sec. From the linear Tafel plot of the cathodic and anodic curves, corrosion rate, corrosion potential (Ecorr), and corrosion current densities (icorr) were obtained.


### 2.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis

The scanning electron microscope images of the aluminum alloy samples were recorded via JEOL JSM-7600F scanning electron microscope.


## 2.1. Materials and Sample Preparation

Aluminum alloy with the chemical composition presented in Table1 was used as substrate material for weight loss and potentiodynamic polarization studies. The aluminum alloy plate was cut using a Struers cutting machine with a Discotom-5 cut-off wheel. A Struers lubricant which works as a coolant was used during cutting. The substrate was cut and machined to dimensions 12 × 12 × 12 mm. The aggressive solution of sodium chloride purchased from SMM Instruments (Pty) Ltd, South Africa, was used for this study. The chemical structure of ferrous gluconate is shown in Figure 1 purchased from SMM Instruments (Pty) Ltd, South Africa. An insulated copper wire was connected to one side of the sample using an aluminum conducting tape and cold mounted in methyl methacrylate resin leaving one surface of an area of 1 cm2 for potentiodynamic polarization measurement; the exposed surface area was abraded with different grates of emery papers, degreased with acetone, rinsed in distilled water, dried, weighed, and stored in a desiccator. The initial weight of the samples was taken and recorded. In each experiment, 0.05 M NaCl solution was prepared freshly as required. Corrosion studies were carried out at 28°C.Table 1
Chemical composition of aluminium alloy (%wt).
Si
Fe
Cu
Mn
Mg
Cr
Ti
Ca
Zr
V
Al
0.157
0.282
0.0025
0.024
0.51
0.023
0.006
0.0011
0.002
0.0035
BalanceFigure 1
Molecular structure of ferrous gluconate.


## 2.2. Weight Loss Measurement

The weight loss test was conducted on the aluminum alloy weighed samples in the absence and presence of different concentrations of inhibitor at 28°C. Volume of the solution used was 200 mL and the concentration of the inhibitor was in the range of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 g/mL in saline environment. The samples were washed with distilled water, dried in acetone, and weighed at an interval of 48 hours of immersion time. Corrosion rate, degree of surface coverage, and inhibitor efficiency were determined for each inhibitor concentration using the following equations:(1)Corrosionrate(mmyr)=87.6WDAT,
where W is weight loss (mg), D is specimen density (g/cm3), A is specimen area (cm2), and T is exposure time (hour)
(2)Degreeofsurfacecoverage(θ)=CR°-CRCR°Percentageinhibitionefficiency(IE)=(CR°-CRCR°)×100,
where CR and CR° are the corrosion rates of the specimens in the presence and absence of inhibitor, respectively.


## 2.3. Potentiodynamic Polarization Measurements

Potentiodynamic polarization tests were carried out using three electrode glass cells with an AUTOLAB Potentiostat (model Reference-668) which was connected to a personal computer to control the experiments. A graphite rod, saturated Ag/AgCl, and aluminum alloy specimen were used as counter, reference, and working electrode respectively. The polarization experiments data were analyzed by NOVA software version 1.8. The polarization curves were carried out with −1.5 V cathodic potential and +1.5 V anodic potential at a scan rate of 0.0016 V/sec. From the linear Tafel plot of the cathodic and anodic curves, corrosion rate, corrosion potential (Ecorr), and corrosion current densities (icorr) were obtained.


## 2.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis

The scanning electron microscope images of the aluminum alloy samples were recorded via JEOL JSM-7600F scanning electron microscope.


## 3. Results and Discussion

The variations in corrosion rate and percentage inhibition efficiency (%IE) with immersion time at different concentrations of ferrous gluconate for 28 days of exposure are shown in Figures2 and 3. Table 2 shows the numerical values of the corrosion current density (icorr), corrosion potential (Ecorr), linear polarization resistance (LPR), corrosion rate, and anodic and cathodic Tafel slopes (βa and βc) with different concentrations of ferrous gluconate. Figure 4 shows the potentiodynamic polarization curves for aluminum alloy dissolution in saline solution in the absence and presence of different concentrations of ferrous gluconate at 28°C. Figure 5 shows the SEM micrograph while Figure 6 illustrates the Langmuir adsorption isotherm. In Figure 7, a comparative chart of the inhibition efficiency obtained from weight loss and potentiodynamic polarization methods was presented.Table 2
Electrochemical polarization parameters for aluminium alloy in 0.05 M NaCl solution in the absence and presence of ferrous gluconate at 28°C.
Concentration of inhibitor(g/mL)
Current density(A/cm2)
Anodic Tafel constant(V/dec)
Cathodic Tafel constant(V/dec)
Linear polarization(Ωcm2)
Corrosion potential(V)
Corrosion rate(mm/yr)
0.0
8.59
E
-
06
0.05087
0.08004
1.57
E
+
03
−0.75893
0.27787
0.5
7.21
E
-
07
0.17081
0.39458
7.18
E
+
04
−1.05640
0.02334
1.0
4.96
E
-
09
0.74904
1.50350
4.38
E
+
07
−0.34318
0.00016
1.5
4.76
E
-
07
0.52492
0.54034
2.43
E
+
05
−0.57367
0.00554
2.0
6.49
E
-
09
1.92670
0.96634
4.30
E
+
07
−0.34318
0.00021Figure 2
Variation of corrosion rate with exposure time for aluminum alloy specimen immersed in 0.05 M NaCl solution with ferrous gluconate addition.Figure 3
Variation of inhibition efficiency with exposure time for aluminum alloy specimen immersed in 0.05 M NaCl solution with ferrous gluconate addition.Figure 4
Linear polarization of aluminum alloy in 0.05 M NaCl solution/ferrous gluconate environment at 28°C.SEM micrograph of the aluminum alloy sample (a) in 0.05 M NaCl solution (b) with ferrous gluconate after 28 days of immersion.
(a)
(b)Figure 6
Langmuir adsorption isotherm of ferrous gluconate on the aluminum surface in 0.05 M NaCl solution obtained from weight loss method at 28°C.Figure 7
Comparative chart of inhibitor efficiency (IE) of aluminum alloy in 0.05 M NaCl solution in the presence of different concentrations of ferrous gluconate obtained from weight loss and potentiodynamic polarization methods.


### 3.1. Corrosion Rate and Inhibitor Efficiency

From the results, the corrosion rate of the aluminum alloy in saline environment decreased in the presence of all the different concentrations of inhibitor studied. Figure2 shows that aluminum alloy in 0.05 M NaCl solution with 1.0 g/mL concentration of inhibitor showed an excellent corrosion resistance. In the presence of 0.5 g/mL concentration of ferrous gluconate, the corrosion rate value was 0.051 mm/yr after 28 days of exposure time compared to the absence of ferrous gluconate which gave 0.110 mm/yr after 28 days of exposure time. This shows 54% reduction in corrosion rate value compared to the absence of inhibitor. This revealed that ferrous gluconate inhibits the corrosion of aluminum alloy in saline medium. The results showed that percentage inhibition efficiency (%IE) of ferrous gluconate depends on the inhibitor concentrations. The results also indicated that the optimum inhibitor efficiency of ferrous gluconate was obtained at a concentration of 1.0 g/mL with 100 percentage efficiency. It is generally assumed that the adsorption of inhibitor at metal/solution interface is the first step in the mechanism of inhibition in aggressive media [29]. It was observed that at inhibitor concentration greater than 1.0 g/mL, the corrosion rate was slightly increased. This could be attributed to excess addition of inhibitor to the saline medium and that certain concentration of ferrous gluconate will have a detrimental effect on corrosion rate.Therefore, the adsorption of ferrous gluconate onto the surface of the aluminum alloy at all concentration studied prevents the breakdown of the film leading to higher corrosion resistance of the aluminum alloy. The inhibition effect of ferrous gluconate decreases gradually with increasing concentration values, which implies that ferrous gluconate has a beneficial effect even at low concentrations. This suggests the formation of soluble ferrous gluconate complex [29, 31, 32].


### 3.2. Potentiodynamic Polarization Measurements

Results obtained show that the cathodic and anodic curves demonstrated a Tafel type behaviour. The presence of ferrous gluconate significantly changes both anodic and cathodic region when compared to the absence of inhibitor [33]. Thus, cathodic and anodic reactions were interfered in the presence of ferrous gluconate, which implies that the ferrous gluconate showed an effective inhibitory effect on cathodic hydrogen reduction reaction and anodic dissolution of aluminum alloy. Also, the result implies that ferrous gluconate acts as a mixed type inhibitor. This can be explained on the basis of specific adsorption of ferrous gluconate anions and on the basis of the competitive adsorption between the ferrous gluconate anions and Cl− ions on the electrode surface and therefore retard the Cl− destructive action [34]. Apparently, the bond between the surface atoms of the metal and the adsorbed inhibitor anions is strong which can inhibit oxidation [34]. The corrosion potential (Ecorr) values shifted to the less negative values in the presence of inhibitor. From Table 2, it is clear that the corrosion current value decreased from 8.59E-06 A/cm2 to 4.96E-09 A/cm2 in the presence of 1.0 g/mL concentration of ferrous gluconate in 0.05 M NaCl solution; ba and bc values changed significantly and Ecorr shifted to cathodic region; hence, ferrous gluconate acted as mixed type inhibitor.The polarization resistance value of aluminum increases from 1.6E03 cm2 in the absence of inhibitor to 4.38E07 cm2 in the presence of 1.0 g/mL concentration of inhibitor, and the corrosion rate value decreases from 0.27787 to 0.000162 mm/yr in the presence of 1.0 g/mL (ses Figure 8). The decrease in corrosion rate and corrosion current density (icorr) in the presence of all the different concentrations of ferrous gluconate studied proved that ferrous gluconate act as an effective corrosion inhibitor for aluminum alloy in saline environment at 28°C.Relationship between concentration and corrosion rate (CR), current density (icorr) and linear polarization (LPR).
(a)
(b)
(c)Anodic and cathodic processes of aluminum corrosion in saline medium are dissolution of aluminum and reduction of dissolved oxygen, respectively, as [35]
(3)4Al⟶4Al3++12e-(4)3O2+6H2O+12e-⟶12OH-.
Therefore, Al3+ reacts with OH− to form aluminum hydroxide near the aluminum surface as follows:
(5)4Al+3O2+6H2O⟶4Al(OH)3.


### 3.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

The surface morphology of the aluminum alloy surface in saline environment in the absence and presence of ferrous gluconate after 28 days of immersion in sodium chloride medium is shown in Figure5. The surface seen in Figure 5(a) is due to the chloride ions attack on the aluminum alloy sample. Flakes showing corrosion products like metal hydroxides and its oxides can be observed [13]. The corrosion process in deep seawater occurs under very specific conditions and is characterized mainly by high chloride contents and the presence of CO2, microorganisms, and H2S [36]. Figure 5(b) shows the SEM micrograph of the specimen after 28 days of immersion in sodium chloride with the presence of ferrous gluconate. It was observed that the corrosion products on the surface of the aluminum in sodium chloride with ferrous gluconate condition are minimal when compared with the micrograph in the absence of inhibitor (Figure 5(a)). The surface of the specimen was noticed to be enclosed with a thin layer of the ferrous gluconate molecules which protects the metal against corrosion [35].


### 3.4. Adsorption Behavior

Figure6 shows the Langmuir adsorption isotherms of ferrous gluconate on the aluminum alloy corrosion in 0.05 M NaCl solution. The linearity in the result at various concentrations of ferrous gluconate proves that the inhibition effect of the inhibitor was as a result of the adsorption of ferrous gluconate on the surface of the metal. The degree of surface coverage (θ) obtained from weight loss test varied linearly with the inhibitor concentration which fit for Langmuir adsorption isotherm [37]. Since the correction factors (R2) is unity (1), the adsorption behaviour of the inhibitor is assumed to have obeyed Langmuir adsorption isotherms.


### 3.5. Inhibitor Efficiency

The percentage inhibition efficiency (%IE) of aluminum alloy in saline environment in the presence of different concentrations of ferrous gluconate was obtained using equation reported elsewhere [15, 17] from weight loss and potentiodynamic polarization techniques. The values of IE (%) from the weight loss, linear polarization resistance (LPR), potentiodynamic polarization-corrosion rate (PP-CR), and potentiodynamic polarization-current density (PP-icorr) measurements obtained by using following equations:
(6)IEPP-icorr(%)=100×icorr-icorr°icorr,(7)IEPP-CR(%)=100×CR-CR°CR,(8)IEPP-LPR(%)=100×Rp°-RpRp,(9)IEWLM(%)=100×CR-CR°CR.
The calculated data for the percentage inhibition efficiency using weight loss method (WLM), potentiodynamic polarization-corrosion rate (PP-CR), linear polarization resistance (LPR), and potentiodynamic polarization-corrosion current density (PP-icorr) are presented in Figure 7. All these parameters showed a similar trend. From the result, it is evident that the IE (%) obtained by different methods are in good agreement at all the concentrations of inhibitor studied. Similar result was documented in [35].PP-
i
corr. The graphical trend shows that the variation of the concentration does bring about a change in PP-icorr value; however, it is not dependent on the concentration; linear relationship was not observed.PP-CR. The graphical trend/regression analysis shows good polynomial relationship between the concentration and corrosion rate. It can be inferred that the PP-CR is dependent on the concentration.LPR. The regression analysis shows a polynomial relationship; hence one can infer that there is a stochastic relation between LPR and concentration.WLM.The variation of the concentration does not bring about any change in the weight loss.In summary, from the results obtained, one can deduce that the best inhibitor performance can be achieved at optimal concentration of 1.0 g/mL for all parameters measured (PP-icorr, PP-CR, LPR, and WLM).


## 3.1. Corrosion Rate and Inhibitor Efficiency

From the results, the corrosion rate of the aluminum alloy in saline environment decreased in the presence of all the different concentrations of inhibitor studied. Figure2 shows that aluminum alloy in 0.05 M NaCl solution with 1.0 g/mL concentration of inhibitor showed an excellent corrosion resistance. In the presence of 0.5 g/mL concentration of ferrous gluconate, the corrosion rate value was 0.051 mm/yr after 28 days of exposure time compared to the absence of ferrous gluconate which gave 0.110 mm/yr after 28 days of exposure time. This shows 54% reduction in corrosion rate value compared to the absence of inhibitor. This revealed that ferrous gluconate inhibits the corrosion of aluminum alloy in saline medium. The results showed that percentage inhibition efficiency (%IE) of ferrous gluconate depends on the inhibitor concentrations. The results also indicated that the optimum inhibitor efficiency of ferrous gluconate was obtained at a concentration of 1.0 g/mL with 100 percentage efficiency. It is generally assumed that the adsorption of inhibitor at metal/solution interface is the first step in the mechanism of inhibition in aggressive media [29]. It was observed that at inhibitor concentration greater than 1.0 g/mL, the corrosion rate was slightly increased. This could be attributed to excess addition of inhibitor to the saline medium and that certain concentration of ferrous gluconate will have a detrimental effect on corrosion rate.Therefore, the adsorption of ferrous gluconate onto the surface of the aluminum alloy at all concentration studied prevents the breakdown of the film leading to higher corrosion resistance of the aluminum alloy. The inhibition effect of ferrous gluconate decreases gradually with increasing concentration values, which implies that ferrous gluconate has a beneficial effect even at low concentrations. This suggests the formation of soluble ferrous gluconate complex [29, 31, 32].


## 3.2. Potentiodynamic Polarization Measurements

Results obtained show that the cathodic and anodic curves demonstrated a Tafel type behaviour. The presence of ferrous gluconate significantly changes both anodic and cathodic region when compared to the absence of inhibitor [33]. Thus, cathodic and anodic reactions were interfered in the presence of ferrous gluconate, which implies that the ferrous gluconate showed an effective inhibitory effect on cathodic hydrogen reduction reaction and anodic dissolution of aluminum alloy. Also, the result implies that ferrous gluconate acts as a mixed type inhibitor. This can be explained on the basis of specific adsorption of ferrous gluconate anions and on the basis of the competitive adsorption between the ferrous gluconate anions and Cl− ions on the electrode surface and therefore retard the Cl− destructive action [34]. Apparently, the bond between the surface atoms of the metal and the adsorbed inhibitor anions is strong which can inhibit oxidation [34]. The corrosion potential (Ecorr) values shifted to the less negative values in the presence of inhibitor. From Table 2, it is clear that the corrosion current value decreased from 8.59E-06 A/cm2 to 4.96E-09 A/cm2 in the presence of 1.0 g/mL concentration of ferrous gluconate in 0.05 M NaCl solution; ba and bc values changed significantly and Ecorr shifted to cathodic region; hence, ferrous gluconate acted as mixed type inhibitor.The polarization resistance value of aluminum increases from 1.6E03 cm2 in the absence of inhibitor to 4.38E07 cm2 in the presence of 1.0 g/mL concentration of inhibitor, and the corrosion rate value decreases from 0.27787 to 0.000162 mm/yr in the presence of 1.0 g/mL (ses Figure 8). The decrease in corrosion rate and corrosion current density (icorr) in the presence of all the different concentrations of ferrous gluconate studied proved that ferrous gluconate act as an effective corrosion inhibitor for aluminum alloy in saline environment at 28°C.Relationship between concentration and corrosion rate (CR), current density (icorr) and linear polarization (LPR).
(a)
(b)
(c)Anodic and cathodic processes of aluminum corrosion in saline medium are dissolution of aluminum and reduction of dissolved oxygen, respectively, as [35]
(3)4Al⟶4Al3++12e-(4)3O2+6H2O+12e-⟶12OH-.
Therefore, Al3+ reacts with OH− to form aluminum hydroxide near the aluminum surface as follows:
(5)4Al+3O2+6H2O⟶4Al(OH)3.


## 3.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

The surface morphology of the aluminum alloy surface in saline environment in the absence and presence of ferrous gluconate after 28 days of immersion in sodium chloride medium is shown in Figure5. The surface seen in Figure 5(a) is due to the chloride ions attack on the aluminum alloy sample. Flakes showing corrosion products like metal hydroxides and its oxides can be observed [13]. The corrosion process in deep seawater occurs under very specific conditions and is characterized mainly by high chloride contents and the presence of CO2, microorganisms, and H2S [36]. Figure 5(b) shows the SEM micrograph of the specimen after 28 days of immersion in sodium chloride with the presence of ferrous gluconate. It was observed that the corrosion products on the surface of the aluminum in sodium chloride with ferrous gluconate condition are minimal when compared with the micrograph in the absence of inhibitor (Figure 5(a)). The surface of the specimen was noticed to be enclosed with a thin layer of the ferrous gluconate molecules which protects the metal against corrosion [35].


## 3.4. Adsorption Behavior

Figure6 shows the Langmuir adsorption isotherms of ferrous gluconate on the aluminum alloy corrosion in 0.05 M NaCl solution. The linearity in the result at various concentrations of ferrous gluconate proves that the inhibition effect of the inhibitor was as a result of the adsorption of ferrous gluconate on the surface of the metal. The degree of surface coverage (θ) obtained from weight loss test varied linearly with the inhibitor concentration which fit for Langmuir adsorption isotherm [37]. Since the correction factors (R2) is unity (1), the adsorption behaviour of the inhibitor is assumed to have obeyed Langmuir adsorption isotherms.


## 3.5. Inhibitor Efficiency

The percentage inhibition efficiency (%IE) of aluminum alloy in saline environment in the presence of different concentrations of ferrous gluconate was obtained using equation reported elsewhere [15, 17] from weight loss and potentiodynamic polarization techniques. The values of IE (%) from the weight loss, linear polarization resistance (LPR), potentiodynamic polarization-corrosion rate (PP-CR), and potentiodynamic polarization-current density (PP-icorr) measurements obtained by using following equations:
(6)IEPP-icorr(%)=100×icorr-icorr°icorr,(7)IEPP-CR(%)=100×CR-CR°CR,(8)IEPP-LPR(%)=100×Rp°-RpRp,(9)IEWLM(%)=100×CR-CR°CR.
The calculated data for the percentage inhibition efficiency using weight loss method (WLM), potentiodynamic polarization-corrosion rate (PP-CR), linear polarization resistance (LPR), and potentiodynamic polarization-corrosion current density (PP-icorr) are presented in Figure 7. All these parameters showed a similar trend. From the result, it is evident that the IE (%) obtained by different methods are in good agreement at all the concentrations of inhibitor studied. Similar result was documented in [35].PP-
i
corr. The graphical trend shows that the variation of the concentration does bring about a change in PP-icorr value; however, it is not dependent on the concentration; linear relationship was not observed.PP-CR. The graphical trend/regression analysis shows good polynomial relationship between the concentration and corrosion rate. It can be inferred that the PP-CR is dependent on the concentration.LPR. The regression analysis shows a polynomial relationship; hence one can infer that there is a stochastic relation between LPR and concentration.WLM.The variation of the concentration does not bring about any change in the weight loss.In summary, from the results obtained, one can deduce that the best inhibitor performance can be achieved at optimal concentration of 1.0 g/mL for all parameters measured (PP-icorr, PP-CR, LPR, and WLM).


## 4. Conclusions

The experimental investigation of the use of ferrous gluconate as corrosion inhibitor in sodium chloride medium led to the following deductions.(i)
Ferrous gluconate acted as an effective corrosion inhibitor for aluminum alloy in sodium chloride environment at 28°C.(ii)
It was established that the optimum concentration of ferrous gluconate that should be used as corrosion inhibitor is 1.0 g/mL at 28°C.(iii)
Polarization result shows that ferrous gluconate acted as a mixed type corrosion inhibitor; adsorption on the aluminum alloy surface obeys Langmuir’s adsorption isotherm.(iv)
The percentage inhibition efficiency obtained from weight loss and potentiodynamic polarization techniques were found to correlate with each other.



---

*Source: 639071-2013-12-09.xml*