# Immune Response of Piglets Receiving Mixture of Formic and Propionic Acid Alone or with Either Capric Acid orBacillus Licheniformis afterEscherichia coli Challenge

Authors: Chunxiao Ren; Qiqi Zhou; Wutai Guan; Xiaofeng Lin; Yijiang Wang; Hanqing Song; Yinzhi Zhang
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

This study aims to evaluate whether diets containing mixture of formic and propionic acid alone or supplemented with either capric acid orBacillus Licheniformiscan alleviate immune inflammatory response of piglets challenged with enterotoxigenicEscherichia coli (ETEC). A total of 30 weaning pigs were assigned to 5 diets, without additive (CON), with antibiotics (ATB), with 1% organic acid (OA; 64% formic and 25% propionic acid), with OA plus 0.2% capric acid (OA + CRA), and with OA plus 0.02% probiotic (Bacillus Licheniformis; OA + PB). After oral challenge with ETEC on day 10, the feces and plasma of all pigs were collected at different time points. Four additive treatments all decreased rectal temperature (RT) at 9 h and fecal scores (FS) at 24 h after challenge (P < 0.05), while at 9 h after challenge, inclusion of OA induced a decrease of RT compared with OA + CRA and OA + PB (P < 0.05). In plasma, concentration of interleukin (IL)-1β was reduced with the addition of ATB and OA at 24 h and 48 h after challenge and it is lower in OA group than OA + CRA group at 24 h after challenge (P < 0.05). Diets with ATB, OA, and OA + PB caused a decrease of the concentrations of IL-6 in plasma at 9 h after challenge (P < 0.05). The four additives treated piglets showed decreased concentrations of plasma tumor necrosis factor-α and interferon-γ at 9 h and 24 h after challenge, respectively (P < 0.05). In conclusion, OA supplementation alleviated the inflammatory response and reduced diarrhea incidence in piglets challenged with ETEC. However, no further improvements were observed when OA supplemented with CRA or probiotics.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Weaning pigs frequently appear postweaning diarrhea, due to the insufficient quantities of gastric acid resulting in a high pH value in stomach and a high risk of enterotoxigenicEscherichia coli (ETEC) infection [1], which leads a lasting detrimental effect on performance [2]. Antibiotics growth promoters have been used in the weaning piglets’ diets for many years and have been proved to be an effective way of attenuating post-weaning diarrhea and improving growth performance of piglets [3], while it was reported that the antibiotics used in livestock accounted for a substantial portion of total antibiotics production [4]. However, the long-term use of antibiotics has accelerated the biological evolution of microorganisms, resulting in the emergence of many drug-resistant microorganisms that threaten human health [5]. Therefore, finding alternatives to antibiotics in livestock production to reduce the risk of bacterial resistance to human is urgently needed.Organic acids, i.e., formic acid and propionic acid, have long been added to weaning pig diets for making up the insufficient quantities of gastric acid to activate pepsin and inhibit the proliferation of pathogens in gastrointestinal tract of piglets [6]. Medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs), i.e., caproic acid, caprylic acid, capric acid, and lauric acid, exhibit broad-spectrum antibacterial properties [7]. Studies have shown that organic acids and MCFAs have a synergistic effect of killing diarrhea causing pathogens [8, 9]. Probiotics such asBacillus Licheniformis have also been widely promoted as alternatives to the antibiotics.Bacillus Licheniformis is able to secrete digestive enzymes, tolerate gastric acid, and compete with pathogens for colonization sites and nutrients [10]. However, there was limited information on whether combinations of formic/propionic acid and capric acid orBacillus Licheniformis could alleviate the intestinal of piglets and whether synergistic action between them exists in vivo. Thus, the effect of dietary supplementation with formic/propionic and its combinations with capric acid orBacillus Licheniformis on the immune response of weaning pigs challenged with ETEC K88 was determined in present study.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Experimental Diets and Feeding Regime

The experimental basal diet was formulated to meet the nutrients requirements for a 6 to 10 kg pig (NRC, 2012) and its compositions and nutrient profile were shown in Table1. Experimental diets are as follows: (1) basal diet without other supplements as a negative control (CON); (2) basal diet with antibiotics (50 mg/kg quinocetone, 75 mg/kg chlortetracycline, 50 mg/kg kitasamycin; ATB); (3) basal diet plus 1% mixture of 64% formic and 25% propionic acid (Lupro-Cid; BASF, Germany; OA); (4) basal diet plus 1% OA and 0.2% capric acid (obtained from sigma-aldrich; OA + CRA); (5) basal diet plus 1% OA and 0.02% probiotic (Bacillus Licheniformis, 1.65 × 1010 viable spores per gram, 3.3 × 106 viable spores ofBacillus Licheniformis per gram of feed; OA + PB). During the whole period of the experiment, the piglets were ad libitum to the feed and water and diets were offered to pigs as mash.Table 1
Compositions of basal diet and nutrient profile, as-fed basal.
Ingredient composition Content (%) Calculated nutrient profile Content Corn 47.25 Digestible energy (MJ/kg) 15.05 Wheat powder 7.50 CP (%) 19.20 Whey 7.50 Crude fat (%) 8.03 Sucrose 2.50 Crude fiber (%) 1.76 Glucose 1.25 Ash (%) 3.01 Soybean Meal 8.50 Calcium (%) 0.77 Extruded soybean 10.00 Phosphorus (%) 0.53 Fish meal 7.00 Available phosphorus (%) 0.34 Soybean oil 2.00 Lysine (%) 1.35 Yeast extract 2.50 Methionine+ Cysteine (%) 0.74 Choline chloride (50%) 0.10 Threonine (%) 0.79 Calcium hydrophosphate 0.38 Tryptophan (%) 0.22 Limestone 0.8 Salt 0.30 L-Lysine HCl 0.50 DL-Methionine 0.22 L-Threonine 0.25 L-Tryptophan 0.02 L-Valine 0.1 Vitamin premix1 0.035 Mineral premix2 0.23 Unite bran 1.065 Total 100.00 1Supplied per kilogram of diet: 11375 IU of vitamin A, 3500 IU of vitamin D3, 26.3 IU of vitamin E, 3.5 mg of vitamin of K3, 3.5 mg of vitamin B1, 8.8 mg of riboflavin, 5.4 mg of vitamin B6, 0.03 mg of vitamin B12, 17.5 mg of pantothenic acid, and 35.0 mg of niacin; 1.75 mg of folacin and 0.14 mg of biotin. 2Supplied per kilogram of diet: 64.4mg of Cu (cupric glycinate), 165.4mg of Fe (iron glycine), 47.8 mg of Mn (manganese glycinate), 47.8mg of Zn (zinc glycinate), 0.54 mg of Se (yeast selenium), 0.68 mg of I (calcium iodate), and 0.1 mg of Co (cobaltous sulfate).


### 2.2. Animals and Housing

A total of 30 male piglets (Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire, initial weight 7.9 ± 0.5 kg) were weighed and randomly allocated to dietary 5 treatments with 6 replicate pens per treatment and 1 pig per pen. The animal use and care protocol were approved by the South China Agricultural University Animal Care and Use Committee.The temperature of the room was maintained at 30 ± 1°C. After placement, pigs were allowed a 6-d adaptation period to acclimate to their new surroundings and feed. During the adaptation period, the piglets showed no signs of diarrhea, skin wounds, or obvious inflammation, which suggested that pigs were healthy and fit for the experiment.


### 2.3. Bacteria Preparation, Oral Challenge, and Fecal Microbial Analysis

Escherichia coli K88 (CVCC225) was purchased from the Chinese Veterinary Medicine Collection Center. TheEscherichia coli K88 was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) genotyping as possessing the genes necessary for heat labile enterotoxin (LT), heat stable enterotoxin (ST), and F4 fimbrial antigen using published primers [11, 12]. After an adaption period of 6 days, the piglets were fed corresponding experimental diets for 9 days and orally challenged with 10 mL of 5 × 109 CFU/mL ETEC K88 via a syringe on the 10th day. Fresh faeces were collected and weighed at 0, 24, and 48 h after ETEC K88 challenge and the fecal pH values were determined using pH meter (Testo 205). Total coliforms were quantified by 10-fold gradient dilution method using eosin methyl blue agar and the plates were incubated aerobically at 37°C for 24 to 48 h [13]. ForLactobacillus spp. counts, the serially diluted samples were quantified with Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe agar and incubated for 48 h at 37°C under anaerobic condition [14].


### 2.4. Rectal Temperature and Diarrhea Assessment

Diarrhea assessment was determined according to fecal scores (FS) system reported by Marquardt et al. [15]. Occurrence and severity of diarrhea were monitored at 0, 9, 24, 48, 96, and 168 h after challenge and assessed as follows: 0; normal; 1; soft feces; 2: mild diarrhea; 3: severe diarrhea by 1 trained personnel with no prior knowledge of the dietary treatment allocation. The rectal temperature (RT) of the piglets was measured by rectal thermometer (Omron MC-347) at 0, 9, 24, 33, 48, 96, and 168 h after ETEC K88 challenge.


### 2.5. Plasma Parameter Analysis

Blood samples were collected via anterior vena cava puncture at 0, 9, 24, 48, 96, and 168 h after challenge into tubes containing EDTA. To obtain the plasma samples, blood samples were centrifuged at 1000 × g for 10 min and then stored at −20°C and analyzed within one month. Plasma concentrations of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, interferon-γ (IFN-γ), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were determined using a porcine-specific multiplex assay (Millipore Multiplex; Billerica, MA, #PCYTMAG-23K-05) according to Vieira‐Potter et al. [16]. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) in the plasma was determined using a commercially available porcine IgG Elisa kit (Huamei, Wuhan). All assays were run in duplicate.


### 2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed as a completely randomized design by using GLM procedures with SPSS (SPSS Software Release 22, IBM Inc., USA). For every assay analysis, a generalized randomized design with repeated measures over time on each experimental unit (individual pig) was followed. Comparisons between dietary treatments and sampling times were made when a significance was found using LSD procedure. All data were presented as least squares means ± SEM.


## 2.1. Experimental Diets and Feeding Regime

The experimental basal diet was formulated to meet the nutrients requirements for a 6 to 10 kg pig (NRC, 2012) and its compositions and nutrient profile were shown in Table1. Experimental diets are as follows: (1) basal diet without other supplements as a negative control (CON); (2) basal diet with antibiotics (50 mg/kg quinocetone, 75 mg/kg chlortetracycline, 50 mg/kg kitasamycin; ATB); (3) basal diet plus 1% mixture of 64% formic and 25% propionic acid (Lupro-Cid; BASF, Germany; OA); (4) basal diet plus 1% OA and 0.2% capric acid (obtained from sigma-aldrich; OA + CRA); (5) basal diet plus 1% OA and 0.02% probiotic (Bacillus Licheniformis, 1.65 × 1010 viable spores per gram, 3.3 × 106 viable spores ofBacillus Licheniformis per gram of feed; OA + PB). During the whole period of the experiment, the piglets were ad libitum to the feed and water and diets were offered to pigs as mash.Table 1
Compositions of basal diet and nutrient profile, as-fed basal.
Ingredient composition Content (%) Calculated nutrient profile Content Corn 47.25 Digestible energy (MJ/kg) 15.05 Wheat powder 7.50 CP (%) 19.20 Whey 7.50 Crude fat (%) 8.03 Sucrose 2.50 Crude fiber (%) 1.76 Glucose 1.25 Ash (%) 3.01 Soybean Meal 8.50 Calcium (%) 0.77 Extruded soybean 10.00 Phosphorus (%) 0.53 Fish meal 7.00 Available phosphorus (%) 0.34 Soybean oil 2.00 Lysine (%) 1.35 Yeast extract 2.50 Methionine+ Cysteine (%) 0.74 Choline chloride (50%) 0.10 Threonine (%) 0.79 Calcium hydrophosphate 0.38 Tryptophan (%) 0.22 Limestone 0.8 Salt 0.30 L-Lysine HCl 0.50 DL-Methionine 0.22 L-Threonine 0.25 L-Tryptophan 0.02 L-Valine 0.1 Vitamin premix1 0.035 Mineral premix2 0.23 Unite bran 1.065 Total 100.00 1Supplied per kilogram of diet: 11375 IU of vitamin A, 3500 IU of vitamin D3, 26.3 IU of vitamin E, 3.5 mg of vitamin of K3, 3.5 mg of vitamin B1, 8.8 mg of riboflavin, 5.4 mg of vitamin B6, 0.03 mg of vitamin B12, 17.5 mg of pantothenic acid, and 35.0 mg of niacin; 1.75 mg of folacin and 0.14 mg of biotin. 2Supplied per kilogram of diet: 64.4mg of Cu (cupric glycinate), 165.4mg of Fe (iron glycine), 47.8 mg of Mn (manganese glycinate), 47.8mg of Zn (zinc glycinate), 0.54 mg of Se (yeast selenium), 0.68 mg of I (calcium iodate), and 0.1 mg of Co (cobaltous sulfate).


## 2.2. Animals and Housing

A total of 30 male piglets (Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire, initial weight 7.9 ± 0.5 kg) were weighed and randomly allocated to dietary 5 treatments with 6 replicate pens per treatment and 1 pig per pen. The animal use and care protocol were approved by the South China Agricultural University Animal Care and Use Committee.The temperature of the room was maintained at 30 ± 1°C. After placement, pigs were allowed a 6-d adaptation period to acclimate to their new surroundings and feed. During the adaptation period, the piglets showed no signs of diarrhea, skin wounds, or obvious inflammation, which suggested that pigs were healthy and fit for the experiment.


## 2.3. Bacteria Preparation, Oral Challenge, and Fecal Microbial Analysis

Escherichia coli K88 (CVCC225) was purchased from the Chinese Veterinary Medicine Collection Center. TheEscherichia coli K88 was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) genotyping as possessing the genes necessary for heat labile enterotoxin (LT), heat stable enterotoxin (ST), and F4 fimbrial antigen using published primers [11, 12]. After an adaption period of 6 days, the piglets were fed corresponding experimental diets for 9 days and orally challenged with 10 mL of 5 × 109 CFU/mL ETEC K88 via a syringe on the 10th day. Fresh faeces were collected and weighed at 0, 24, and 48 h after ETEC K88 challenge and the fecal pH values were determined using pH meter (Testo 205). Total coliforms were quantified by 10-fold gradient dilution method using eosin methyl blue agar and the plates were incubated aerobically at 37°C for 24 to 48 h [13]. ForLactobacillus spp. counts, the serially diluted samples were quantified with Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe agar and incubated for 48 h at 37°C under anaerobic condition [14].


## 2.4. Rectal Temperature and Diarrhea Assessment

Diarrhea assessment was determined according to fecal scores (FS) system reported by Marquardt et al. [15]. Occurrence and severity of diarrhea were monitored at 0, 9, 24, 48, 96, and 168 h after challenge and assessed as follows: 0; normal; 1; soft feces; 2: mild diarrhea; 3: severe diarrhea by 1 trained personnel with no prior knowledge of the dietary treatment allocation. The rectal temperature (RT) of the piglets was measured by rectal thermometer (Omron MC-347) at 0, 9, 24, 33, 48, 96, and 168 h after ETEC K88 challenge.


## 2.5. Plasma Parameter Analysis

Blood samples were collected via anterior vena cava puncture at 0, 9, 24, 48, 96, and 168 h after challenge into tubes containing EDTA. To obtain the plasma samples, blood samples were centrifuged at 1000 × g for 10 min and then stored at −20°C and analyzed within one month. Plasma concentrations of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, interferon-γ (IFN-γ), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were determined using a porcine-specific multiplex assay (Millipore Multiplex; Billerica, MA, #PCYTMAG-23K-05) according to Vieira‐Potter et al. [16]. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) in the plasma was determined using a commercially available porcine IgG Elisa kit (Huamei, Wuhan). All assays were run in duplicate.


## 2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed as a completely randomized design by using GLM procedures with SPSS (SPSS Software Release 22, IBM Inc., USA). For every assay analysis, a generalized randomized design with repeated measures over time on each experimental unit (individual pig) was followed. Comparisons between dietary treatments and sampling times were made when a significance was found using LSD procedure. All data were presented as least squares means ± SEM.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Rectal Temperature and Fecal Scores

Overall, after challenge, the FS increased in all groups (P < 0.05) and the control pigs had higher FS than pigs in other four treatment groups at 24 h after challenge (P < 0.05) (Figure 1). The ETEC challenge caused an increased RT of piglets in CON and OA + CRA groups (P < 0.05) with higher RT at 24 h than 0 h after challenge in these two groups (P < 0.05) (Figure 2). The piglets showed lower RT when they fed diets with additives, and OA treated piglets had lower RT compared with OA + CRA or OA + PB at 9 h after challenge (P < 0.05).Figure 1
Effects of organic acid or organic acid supplemented with either capric acid orBacillus Licheniformis on fecal scores of pigs challenged with enterotoxigenicEscherichia coli (ETEC). CON = basal diet; ATB = basal diet plus antibiotics; OA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid; OA + CRA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.2% capric; OA + PB = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.02% probiotic (3.3 × 106 viable spores ofBacillus Licheniformis per gram of feed). Values are least squares means ± SEM. x-z Within per treatment, value at different time points without a common superscript differs (P < 0.05); a-b within per time point, value with different treatments without a common superscript differs (P < 0.05).Figure 2
Effects of organic acid or organic acid supplemented with either capric acid orBacillus Licheniformis on rectal temperature of pigs challenged with enterotoxigenicEscherichia coli(ETEC). CON = basal diet; ATB = basal diet plus antibiotics; OA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid; OA + CRA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.2% capric; OA + PB = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.02% probiotic (3.3 × 106 viable spores ofBacillus Licheniformis per gram of feed). Values are least squares means ± SEM. w-z Within per treatment, value at different time points without a common superscript differs (P < 0.05); a-b within per time point, value with different treatments without a common superscript differs (P < 0.05).


### 3.2. Inflammatory Cytokines and Immunoglobulin G in Plasma

After challenge, higher plasma IL-1β concentration was appeared at 9, 24, and 48 h than 0 h in CON group (P < 0.05), and higher plasma IL-6 concentrations were appeared at 9 h than 0 h in CON group (P < 0.05) (Tables 2 and 3). With the addition of ATB and OA, plasma IL-1β concentration was decreased at 24 and 48 h after challenge (P < 0.05), while at 24 h after challenge OA supplementation decreased plasma IL-1β concentration compared with OA + CRA (P < 0.05). Pigs receiving ATB, OA, and OA + PB diets decreased IL-6 concentration in plasma at 9 h after challenge compared with CON group (P < 0.05).Table 2
Effect of organic acid or organic acid supplemented with either capric acid orBacillus Licheniformis on interleukine-1β (pg/mL) concentration in plasma of pigs challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.
Time, h Treatments SEM P-value CON ATB OA OA + CRA OA + PB 0 HPC1 900z 631 877 882 902 53 0.444 9 HPC 1351xy 821 1075 1141 1175 85 0.438 24 HPC 1605xa 711b 860b 1359a 1252ab 92 0.005 48 HPC 1420xa 774c 864bc 1299ab 1024abc 80 0.035 96 HPC 1255xyz 740 751 1173 914 81 0.144 168 HPC 934yz 769 741 959 826 55 0.678 SEM 77 57 54 64 66 P-value 0.023 0.959 0.578 0.201 0.406 CON = basal diet; ATB = basal diet plus antibiotics; OA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid; OA + CRA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.2% capric; OA + PB = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.02% probiotic (3.3×106 viable spores of Bacillus Licheniformis per gram of feed). 1 HPC: hours after challenge. x - z Within per treatment, values at different time points without a common superscript differ significantly at P< 0.05; a-b within per time point, values with different treatments without a common superscript differ significantly at P< 0.05.Table 3
Effect of organic acid or organic acid supplemented with either capric acid orBacillus Licheniformis on interleukine-6 (pg/mL) concentration in plasma of pigs challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.
Time, h Treatments SEM P-value CON ATB OA OA + CRA OA + PB 0 HPC1 280.2y 283.8 294.4 304.2 258.7 12.8 0.860 9 HPC 480.8xa 369.8b 358.7b 423.1ab 372.5b 14.6 0.045 24 HPC 395.4xy 315.1 319.3 386.5 324.5 19.3 0.556 48 HPC 350.2y 284.6 325.3 312.8 307.1 17.7 0.872 96 HPC 303.0y 268.1 306.2 323.2 295.0 17.4 0.911 168 HPC 286.2y 274.5 284.4 292.9 297.0 15.1 0.993 SEM 20.9 13.9 14.1 15.8 16.2 P-value 0.022 0.304 0.749 0.095 0.483 CON = basal diet; ATB = basal diet plus antibiotics; OA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid; OA + CRA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.2% capric; OA + PB = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.02% probiotic (3.3×106 viable spores of Bacillus Licheniformis per gram of feed). 1 HPC: hours after challenge. x - z Within per treatment, values at different time points without a common superscript differ significantly at P< 0.05; a-b within per time point, values with different treatments without a common superscript differ significantly at P< 0.05.After challenge, plasma TNF-α concentrations significantly increased in CON, OA, and OA + CRA groups (P < 0.05) and plasma IFN-γ concentrations significantly increased in CON and OA + CRA groups (P < 0.05) (Tables 4 and 5). The higher plasma TNF-α and IFN-γ concentrations were observed in the pigs of CON groups than the pigs of other four treatment groups at 9 and 24 h after challenge, respectively (P < 0.05). Plasma IgG concentration was significantly increased in OA + CRA group after challenge (P < 0.05) and did not differ significantly among the five treatment groups (P > 0.05) (Table 6).Table 4
Effect of organic acid or organic acid supplemented with either capric acid orBacillus Licheniformis on tumor necrosis factor-α (pg/mL) concentration in plasma of pigs challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.
Time, h Treatments SEM P-value CON ATB OA OA + CRA OA + PB 0 HPC1 160.9y 119.3 159.5y 172.2z 139.2 12.7 0.727 9 HPC 475.4xa 213.7b 288.3xb 306.2xyb 226.6b 24.7 0.003 24 HPC 297.3xy 153.4 239.8xy 328.5x 259.1 26.2 0.267 48 HPC 316.1xy 163.2 237.5xy 202.1xyz 189.1 22.1 0.276 96 HPC 250.9y 173.2 165.0y 190.2yz 191.2 17.8 0.672 168 HPC 166.9y 127.9 146.2y 139.0z 168.3 15.7 0.927 SEM 33.1 11.0 15.9 20.7 15.2 P-value 0.042 0.144 0.039 0.031 0.243 CON = basal diet; ATB = basal diet plus antibiotics; OA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid; OA + CRA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.2% capric; OA + PB = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.02% probiotic (3.3×106 viable spores of Bacillus Licheniformis per gram of feed). 1 HPC: hours after challenge. x - z Within per treatment, values at different time points without a common superscript differ significantly at P< 0.05; a-b within per time point, values with different treatments without a common superscript differ significantly at P< 0.05.Table 5
Effect of organic acid or organic acid supplemented with either capric acid orBacillus Licheniformis on interferon-γ (ng/mL) concentration in plasma of pigs challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.
Time, h Treatments SEM P-value CON ATB OA OA + CRA OA + PB 0 HPC1 13.72z 14.32 13.01 13.23y 12.25 0.85 0.962 9 HPC 24.54y 21.40 15.19 17.79xy 22.70 1.46 0.272 24 HPC 35.26xa 24.88b 17.02b 23.51xb 20.77b 1.89 0.033 48 HPC 24.29y 16.60 15.70 18.31xy 18.89 1.31 0.343 96 HPC 22.08y 15.38 14.69 14.50y 13.62 1.34 0.352 168 HPC 16.54yz 14.56 12.51 14.25y 12.36 1.11 0.809 SEM 1.72 1.74 0.55 1.03 1.32 P-value <0.001 0.427 0.159 0.027 0.053 CON = basal diet; ATB = basal diet plus antibiotics; OA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid; OA + CRA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.2% capric; OA + PB = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.02% probiotic (3.3×106 viable spores of Bacillus Licheniformis per gram of feed). 1 HPC: hours after challenge. x - z Within per treatment, values at different time points without a common superscript differ significantly at P< 0.05; a-b within per time point, values with different treatments without a common superscript differ significantly at P< 0.05.Table 6
Effect of organic acid or organic acid supplemented with either capric acid orBacillus Licheniformis on Immunoglobulin G (μg/mL) concentration in plasma of pigs challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.
Time, h Treatments SEM P-value CON ATB OA OA+ CRA OA + PB 0 HPC1 1210 1373 1461 1219w 1569 104 0.801 9 HPC 1544 1643 1683 1458zw 1487 137 0.985 24 HPC 1651 1414 1714 1604yzw 1726 98 0.871 48 HPC 1867 1450 1414 1741yz 1887 121 0.625 96 HPC 2723 1798 1899 2072xy 2131 111 0.099 168 HPC 2482 2039 2080 2290x 2196 104 0.743 SEM 174 104 86 92 123 P-value 0.061 0.408 0.198 0.001 0.479 CON = basal diet; ATB = basal diet plus antibiotics; OA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid; OA + CRA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.2% capric; OA + PB = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.02% probiotic (3.3×106 viable spores of Bacillus Licheniformis per gram of feed). 1 HPC: hours after challenge. w - z Within per treatment, value at different time points without a common superscript differs(P<0.05); a-b within per time point, value with different treatments without a common superscript differs (P<0.05).


### 3.3. Microbial Populations in Feces

There was no effect of treatment on fecal pH values and total coliforms andLactobacillus counts observed at 0, 24, and 48 h after challenge (P > 0.05) (Table 7).Table 7
Effect of organic acid or organic acid supplemented with either capric acid orBacillus Licheniformis on fecal pH values and microbial counts (log10 CFU/g) of piglets challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.
Item Treatments SEM P-value CON ATB OA OA + CRA OA + PB 0 HPC1 pH 6.93 6.76 6.71 6.74 6.65 0.06 0.700 Total coliforms 7.32 7.15 7.48 7.22 7.04 0.11 0.777 Lactobacillus 8.14 8.58 8.59 8.20 9.01 0.15 0.410 24 HPC pH 7.60 7.39 7.28 7.26 7.39 0.05 0.331 Total coliforms 7.71 7.28 7.17 7.13 6.98 0.12 0.489 Lactobacillus 8.15 8.33 8.41 8.37 7.93 0.15 0.867 48 HPC pH 7.47 7.41 7.23 7.29 7.20 0.04 0.298 Total coliforms 7.26 7.12 7.19 7.08 6.67 0.17 0.872 Lactobacillus 8.71 8.63 8.43 8.10 8.39 0.15 0.833 CON = basal diet; ATB = basal diet plus antibiotics; OA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid; OA + CRA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.2% capric; OA + PB = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.02% probiotic (3.3×106 viable spores of Bacillus Licheniformis per gram of feed). 1 HPC: hours after challenge.


## 3.1. Rectal Temperature and Fecal Scores

Overall, after challenge, the FS increased in all groups (P < 0.05) and the control pigs had higher FS than pigs in other four treatment groups at 24 h after challenge (P < 0.05) (Figure 1). The ETEC challenge caused an increased RT of piglets in CON and OA + CRA groups (P < 0.05) with higher RT at 24 h than 0 h after challenge in these two groups (P < 0.05) (Figure 2). The piglets showed lower RT when they fed diets with additives, and OA treated piglets had lower RT compared with OA + CRA or OA + PB at 9 h after challenge (P < 0.05).Figure 1
Effects of organic acid or organic acid supplemented with either capric acid orBacillus Licheniformis on fecal scores of pigs challenged with enterotoxigenicEscherichia coli (ETEC). CON = basal diet; ATB = basal diet plus antibiotics; OA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid; OA + CRA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.2% capric; OA + PB = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.02% probiotic (3.3 × 106 viable spores ofBacillus Licheniformis per gram of feed). Values are least squares means ± SEM. x-z Within per treatment, value at different time points without a common superscript differs (P < 0.05); a-b within per time point, value with different treatments without a common superscript differs (P < 0.05).Figure 2
Effects of organic acid or organic acid supplemented with either capric acid orBacillus Licheniformis on rectal temperature of pigs challenged with enterotoxigenicEscherichia coli(ETEC). CON = basal diet; ATB = basal diet plus antibiotics; OA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid; OA + CRA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.2% capric; OA + PB = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.02% probiotic (3.3 × 106 viable spores ofBacillus Licheniformis per gram of feed). Values are least squares means ± SEM. w-z Within per treatment, value at different time points without a common superscript differs (P < 0.05); a-b within per time point, value with different treatments without a common superscript differs (P < 0.05).


## 3.2. Inflammatory Cytokines and Immunoglobulin G in Plasma

After challenge, higher plasma IL-1β concentration was appeared at 9, 24, and 48 h than 0 h in CON group (P < 0.05), and higher plasma IL-6 concentrations were appeared at 9 h than 0 h in CON group (P < 0.05) (Tables 2 and 3). With the addition of ATB and OA, plasma IL-1β concentration was decreased at 24 and 48 h after challenge (P < 0.05), while at 24 h after challenge OA supplementation decreased plasma IL-1β concentration compared with OA + CRA (P < 0.05). Pigs receiving ATB, OA, and OA + PB diets decreased IL-6 concentration in plasma at 9 h after challenge compared with CON group (P < 0.05).Table 2
Effect of organic acid or organic acid supplemented with either capric acid orBacillus Licheniformis on interleukine-1β (pg/mL) concentration in plasma of pigs challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.
Time, h Treatments SEM P-value CON ATB OA OA + CRA OA + PB 0 HPC1 900z 631 877 882 902 53 0.444 9 HPC 1351xy 821 1075 1141 1175 85 0.438 24 HPC 1605xa 711b 860b 1359a 1252ab 92 0.005 48 HPC 1420xa 774c 864bc 1299ab 1024abc 80 0.035 96 HPC 1255xyz 740 751 1173 914 81 0.144 168 HPC 934yz 769 741 959 826 55 0.678 SEM 77 57 54 64 66 P-value 0.023 0.959 0.578 0.201 0.406 CON = basal diet; ATB = basal diet plus antibiotics; OA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid; OA + CRA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.2% capric; OA + PB = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.02% probiotic (3.3×106 viable spores of Bacillus Licheniformis per gram of feed). 1 HPC: hours after challenge. x - z Within per treatment, values at different time points without a common superscript differ significantly at P< 0.05; a-b within per time point, values with different treatments without a common superscript differ significantly at P< 0.05.Table 3
Effect of organic acid or organic acid supplemented with either capric acid orBacillus Licheniformis on interleukine-6 (pg/mL) concentration in plasma of pigs challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.
Time, h Treatments SEM P-value CON ATB OA OA + CRA OA + PB 0 HPC1 280.2y 283.8 294.4 304.2 258.7 12.8 0.860 9 HPC 480.8xa 369.8b 358.7b 423.1ab 372.5b 14.6 0.045 24 HPC 395.4xy 315.1 319.3 386.5 324.5 19.3 0.556 48 HPC 350.2y 284.6 325.3 312.8 307.1 17.7 0.872 96 HPC 303.0y 268.1 306.2 323.2 295.0 17.4 0.911 168 HPC 286.2y 274.5 284.4 292.9 297.0 15.1 0.993 SEM 20.9 13.9 14.1 15.8 16.2 P-value 0.022 0.304 0.749 0.095 0.483 CON = basal diet; ATB = basal diet plus antibiotics; OA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid; OA + CRA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.2% capric; OA + PB = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.02% probiotic (3.3×106 viable spores of Bacillus Licheniformis per gram of feed). 1 HPC: hours after challenge. x - z Within per treatment, values at different time points without a common superscript differ significantly at P< 0.05; a-b within per time point, values with different treatments without a common superscript differ significantly at P< 0.05.After challenge, plasma TNF-α concentrations significantly increased in CON, OA, and OA + CRA groups (P < 0.05) and plasma IFN-γ concentrations significantly increased in CON and OA + CRA groups (P < 0.05) (Tables 4 and 5). The higher plasma TNF-α and IFN-γ concentrations were observed in the pigs of CON groups than the pigs of other four treatment groups at 9 and 24 h after challenge, respectively (P < 0.05). Plasma IgG concentration was significantly increased in OA + CRA group after challenge (P < 0.05) and did not differ significantly among the five treatment groups (P > 0.05) (Table 6).Table 4
Effect of organic acid or organic acid supplemented with either capric acid orBacillus Licheniformis on tumor necrosis factor-α (pg/mL) concentration in plasma of pigs challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.
Time, h Treatments SEM P-value CON ATB OA OA + CRA OA + PB 0 HPC1 160.9y 119.3 159.5y 172.2z 139.2 12.7 0.727 9 HPC 475.4xa 213.7b 288.3xb 306.2xyb 226.6b 24.7 0.003 24 HPC 297.3xy 153.4 239.8xy 328.5x 259.1 26.2 0.267 48 HPC 316.1xy 163.2 237.5xy 202.1xyz 189.1 22.1 0.276 96 HPC 250.9y 173.2 165.0y 190.2yz 191.2 17.8 0.672 168 HPC 166.9y 127.9 146.2y 139.0z 168.3 15.7 0.927 SEM 33.1 11.0 15.9 20.7 15.2 P-value 0.042 0.144 0.039 0.031 0.243 CON = basal diet; ATB = basal diet plus antibiotics; OA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid; OA + CRA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.2% capric; OA + PB = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.02% probiotic (3.3×106 viable spores of Bacillus Licheniformis per gram of feed). 1 HPC: hours after challenge. x - z Within per treatment, values at different time points without a common superscript differ significantly at P< 0.05; a-b within per time point, values with different treatments without a common superscript differ significantly at P< 0.05.Table 5
Effect of organic acid or organic acid supplemented with either capric acid orBacillus Licheniformis on interferon-γ (ng/mL) concentration in plasma of pigs challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.
Time, h Treatments SEM P-value CON ATB OA OA + CRA OA + PB 0 HPC1 13.72z 14.32 13.01 13.23y 12.25 0.85 0.962 9 HPC 24.54y 21.40 15.19 17.79xy 22.70 1.46 0.272 24 HPC 35.26xa 24.88b 17.02b 23.51xb 20.77b 1.89 0.033 48 HPC 24.29y 16.60 15.70 18.31xy 18.89 1.31 0.343 96 HPC 22.08y 15.38 14.69 14.50y 13.62 1.34 0.352 168 HPC 16.54yz 14.56 12.51 14.25y 12.36 1.11 0.809 SEM 1.72 1.74 0.55 1.03 1.32 P-value <0.001 0.427 0.159 0.027 0.053 CON = basal diet; ATB = basal diet plus antibiotics; OA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid; OA + CRA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.2% capric; OA + PB = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.02% probiotic (3.3×106 viable spores of Bacillus Licheniformis per gram of feed). 1 HPC: hours after challenge. x - z Within per treatment, values at different time points without a common superscript differ significantly at P< 0.05; a-b within per time point, values with different treatments without a common superscript differ significantly at P< 0.05.Table 6
Effect of organic acid or organic acid supplemented with either capric acid orBacillus Licheniformis on Immunoglobulin G (μg/mL) concentration in plasma of pigs challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.
Time, h Treatments SEM P-value CON ATB OA OA+ CRA OA + PB 0 HPC1 1210 1373 1461 1219w 1569 104 0.801 9 HPC 1544 1643 1683 1458zw 1487 137 0.985 24 HPC 1651 1414 1714 1604yzw 1726 98 0.871 48 HPC 1867 1450 1414 1741yz 1887 121 0.625 96 HPC 2723 1798 1899 2072xy 2131 111 0.099 168 HPC 2482 2039 2080 2290x 2196 104 0.743 SEM 174 104 86 92 123 P-value 0.061 0.408 0.198 0.001 0.479 CON = basal diet; ATB = basal diet plus antibiotics; OA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid; OA + CRA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.2% capric; OA + PB = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.02% probiotic (3.3×106 viable spores of Bacillus Licheniformis per gram of feed). 1 HPC: hours after challenge. w - z Within per treatment, value at different time points without a common superscript differs(P<0.05); a-b within per time point, value with different treatments without a common superscript differs (P<0.05).


## 3.3. Microbial Populations in Feces

There was no effect of treatment on fecal pH values and total coliforms andLactobacillus counts observed at 0, 24, and 48 h after challenge (P > 0.05) (Table 7).Table 7
Effect of organic acid or organic acid supplemented with either capric acid orBacillus Licheniformis on fecal pH values and microbial counts (log10 CFU/g) of piglets challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.
Item Treatments SEM P-value CON ATB OA OA + CRA OA + PB 0 HPC1 pH 6.93 6.76 6.71 6.74 6.65 0.06 0.700 Total coliforms 7.32 7.15 7.48 7.22 7.04 0.11 0.777 Lactobacillus 8.14 8.58 8.59 8.20 9.01 0.15 0.410 24 HPC pH 7.60 7.39 7.28 7.26 7.39 0.05 0.331 Total coliforms 7.71 7.28 7.17 7.13 6.98 0.12 0.489 Lactobacillus 8.15 8.33 8.41 8.37 7.93 0.15 0.867 48 HPC pH 7.47 7.41 7.23 7.29 7.20 0.04 0.298 Total coliforms 7.26 7.12 7.19 7.08 6.67 0.17 0.872 Lactobacillus 8.71 8.63 8.43 8.10 8.39 0.15 0.833 CON = basal diet; ATB = basal diet plus antibiotics; OA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid; OA + CRA = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.2% capric; OA + PB = basal diet plus 1% organic acid + 0.02% probiotic (3.3×106 viable spores of Bacillus Licheniformis per gram of feed). 1 HPC: hours after challenge.


## 4. Discussion

Oral challenge with ETEC has been widely used as model to screen out effective antibiotic substitutes that protect piglets from suffering postweaning diarrhea [17], which causes impaired growth performance and high mortality [18]. The lipopolysaccharide of ETEC can activate the nuclear factor-κB pathway through toll like receptor 4, leading to the occurrence of intestinal epithelial cell inflammation [19], while the LT and ST produced by ETEC K88 can cause diarrhea in piglets through the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator of intestinal epithelial cells [20]. In this study, fecal scores were used to evaluate intensity of diarrhea in piglets according to methods previously reported [15, 21]. After challenge, the fecal scores of piglets increased in each treatment group, and piglets receiving ATB, OA, OA + CRA, and OA + PB diets all exhibited lower fecal scores compared with CON group at 24 h after challenge. Short chain fatty acids have a broad-spectrum bactericidal capacity against gram negative bacteria and can kill pathogens at low pH [22, 23]. Therefore, adding short chain fatty acid in the diet can form a line of defense in the low pH condition of stomach to kill pathogens, thereby, weakening the pathogen’s damage to the small intestine of piglets. Additionally, expression of virulence gene was suppressed when pathogens were grown in medium supplemented with subminimal inhibition concentration of short and medium chain fatty acids [24–26]. Dietary inclusion of formic/propionic mixture may reduce the harm of ETEC to the intestines and then decrease the incidence of piglet diarrhea.In the present study, no additional effects on the fecal scores of piglets were observed when organic acids combined with medium-chain fatty acids. It has been reported that short and medium-chain fatty acids have a synergistic bactericidal effect in vitro [8, 9]; nevertheless, the antimicrobial ability of capric acid was not only toEscherichia coli but also toLactobacillus (conformed in vitro in our lab, but data has not been publicly reported); when they used together, they may influence theLactobacillus counts in the gut of the piglets. However, some researches showed that inclusion of OAs and MCFAs in the piglets’ diets enrichedlactobacillus in ileal and rectal content [27], MCFAs at low dietary levels increasedlactobacillus johnsonii andlactobacillus amylovorus counts in gastric contents [28], and dietary 0.15% MCFAs induced minor changes in the gastrointestinal microbiota [29]. The different gastrointestinal microbiota response to MCFAs may be due to the dosage and species of MCFAs in the diets, in which the lower dosage MCFAs performed beneficial gut flora modifier, and the optimal dosage of MCFAs in the piglets’ diet needs further exploration.Bacillus Licheniformis was also reported to control postweaning diarrhea syndrome of piglets [30]. However, no additional effects on the fecal scores of piglets were observed when organic acids combined withBacillus Licheniformis. The reports about the combination of probiotic and organic acids in the piglets’ diets were limited, and Wolfenden et al. [31] reported combination treatment with organic acid andlactobacillus was more effective than individual treatment forSalmonella reduction in chicks. No better improvements when organic acid was supplemented with probiotic in the present study may be due to the different probiotic strains, and the combined effects of organic acids and different probiotics may vary.Inflammation of intestinal epithelial cells was induced by activating the nuclear factor-κB pathway by lipopolysaccharide, LT, and ST of ETEC, which increased the animal body temperature [21]. Rectal temperature is a sensitive indicator of intestinal inflammation in oral ETEC challenge model, and short-term temperature rises after challenge had been appeared in other ETEC challenge reports [18]. Our results also implied that RT of piglets were increased after challenge with ETEC, after reaching the peak value, and the RT of piglets in all treatment groups began to gradually decrease to normal physiological value within 168 hours. At 9 h after challenge, piglets fed OA and ATB diets decreased RT relative to CON diet, which was observed in other trials of some effective antibiotic substitutes [21, 32, 33]. In the present study, 1% of formic/propionic acid mixture mitigated fever of piglets induced by ETEC challenge to a similar extent as the antibiotic treatment.During the process of inflammation, IL-1β and IL-6 in blood can produce heat and cause an increase in body temperature. Compared with CON pigs, those fed OA decreased plasma IL-6 concentration at 9 h after challenge, which was consistent with the RT displayed in CON and OA groups. Addition of 1% of an organic acid blend to feeds of ETEC challenged piglets suppressed inflammation therefore decreasing RT after challenge to a level on par with the antibiotic treatment group. Similarly, Zhang et al. [34] reported that IL-1β level in serum was decreased at 6 h after ETEC K88 challenge in piglets orally inoculated withLactobacillus rhamnosus GG, while Kiarie et al. [35] reported that piglets fed diets containing either egg yolk antibodies or nonstarch polysaccharide hydrolysis products decreased serum IL-6 concentration at 6 h after ETEC K88 challenge. In these studies,Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and egg yolk appeared to alleviate the pronounced acute inflammatory response induced by ETEC K88 in piglets. These studies demonstrated that this formic/propionic acid mixture can also be used as an effective antibiotic substitute to relieve inflammation induced by ETEC K88.Plasma TNF-α was measured as indicators of systemic pro-inflammation response and primarily secreted by activated phagocytic cells during the period of an acute enteric disease. The depression of circulating TNF-α in OA, OA + CRA, and OA + PB group compared to CON group was observed at 9 h after challenge, and this reduction was observed in the ETEC challenge pigs of other reports [34]. Consistent decline in circulating IFN-γ was also observed at 24 h after challenge. Interferon-γ contributes to T helper cell 1 differentiation and bridges the innate and specific immune response. It was possible that piglets receiving OA, OA + CRA, and OA + PB not only relieved initial immune response but also alleviated cellular immune responses after ETEC challenge. The changes of TNF-α and IFN-γ also reflected that no additional mitigation was observed when OA plus either CRA or PB. Although marked synergistic bactericidal effect of organic acids in combination with MCFAs was reported in vitro [8, 9] and organic acids and MCFAs had an interaction in reducing counts of Enterobacteria in the stomach [29]. Nevertheless, pigs fed diets containing 1% of a formic/propionic acid mixture performed well and the overall level of infection challenge was most likely low. Therefore, testing the capric orBacillus Licheniformisunder lower doses of organic acid or under greater disease challenge may be warranted.After challenge, IgG in plasma of piglets increased with time, indicating that IgG mediated humoral immunity and exerted antibacterial effects in the body of piglets. However, no significant difference was found between each treatment group. Before and after the challenge, no significant difference was found in the fecal pH values and totalE. coli andLactobacillus counts. This may be due to the fact that liquid organic acids would prevent the passage of pathogens and regulate the microbes in the stomach and proximal segments of intestine [36]. It is possible that organic acids were absorbed in mid and posterior segment of the small intestine [37], and they had little effects on the number of microbes in posterior segment of intestinal and feces.


## 5. Conclusion

Overall, administrating 1% of a formic/propionic acid mixture alleviated the inflammatory response of weaning pigs challenged with ETEC K88 and then reduced febrile and diarrhea. This was comparable to the reference group supplemented with antibiotics commonly used by pig producers in weaning feed to improve performance and to prevent enteric diseases. Therefore, this study suggests that the use of this formic/propionic acid mixture at 1% in weaning pig diets can be considered a valid alternative to antibiotics, at least with regard to ETEC challenge. However, no further improvements were observed when the organic acid blend was supplemented in conjunction with either capric orBacillus Licheniformis.



---

*Source: 6416187-2019-03-25.xml*