# Improved Expression for Estimation of Leakage Inductance inE Core Transformer Using Energy Method

Authors: Sivananda Reddy Thondapu; Mangesh B. Borage; Yashwant D. Wanmode; Purushottam Shrivastava
Journal: Advances in Power Electronics
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

This paper proposes a simpler and more accurate expression for estimation of leakage inductance inE core transformer, which is the most widely used transformer structure. The derived expression for leakage inductance accounts for the flux extending into air. The finite element method (FEM) analysis is made on the secondary shorted transformer to observe the H-field pattern. The results obtained from FEM analysis are used for approximating the field that is extending into air to derive an expression for leakage inductance. This expression is experimentally validated on prototype transformers of different core dimensions.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Transformer is one of the basic building blocks of many power converters. The following are some of the cases where accurate estimation of leakage inductance is required.(i)
Different resonant converter topologies, discussed in [1–5], use parasitics of transformer as a part of resonant tank network. For designing power converter with such topologies, one requires accurate estimation of leakage inductance.(ii)
In hard switched converters, in every cycle the energy stored in the parasitics appears as loss in converter. In estimation of efficiency of such converters, one needs to estimate leakage inductance before hand.(iii)
For designing snubber circuits to limit device voltage during turn-off transients [6–8], one needs to estimate leakage inductance. These turn-off transients mainly occur due to energy stored in the leakage inductance of the transformer.Methods that are usually employed for estimation of leakage inductance are (i) energy method [8–13] and (ii) method of mutual fluxes.In energy method, the energy stored in magnetic field of the secondary shorted transformer is calculated and equated to(1/2)LleakIp2 where Lleak is the leakage inductance of the transformer when referred to primary, and Ip is current flowing through primary.TheH-profile inside the coil is calculated using Ampere's law. The energy stored in magnetic field is calculated by evaluating the volume integral in (1):(1)Estored=μ2∭H2dv=12LleakIp2.The expression derived for leakage inductance using energy method is independent of frequency. Hence, it does not consider any frequency-dependent effects on leakage inductance. The energy method is used for comparing leakage inductance, in different winding configurations.On the other hand, method of mutual fluxes uses Maxwell's equations to predict the leakage inductance more accurately at high frequencies. As this method accounts for frequency-dependent effects like eddy current losses and altered flux pattern due to eddy currents, it gives more accurate results, particularly at high frequencies. In [14], a frequency-dependent formula is presented to find leakage inductance in a toroidal core transformers.In this paper, an expression for leakage inductance is derived using energy method. Expression derived accounts for the flux that extends into air in a secondary shorted transformer, which is not considered earlier [8, 10, 11]. Therefore, the estimated leakage inductance using this expression has better accuracy.


## 2. Estimation of Leakage Inductance onE Core Transformer

FEM analysis on secondary shorted transformer is made using CST Ver 2008.5 (with magneto-static solver). The simulation result of FEM analysis is shown in Figure1. The simulation result is the H-field pattern of secondary shorted E core transformer. This gives an idea of profile of H-field from the surface of the core to the outer surface of the whole winding. The profile of H-field of a E core transformer and its winding configuration is shown in Figures 2 and 3, respectively.Simulation result of FEM analysis.
(a)
Perspective(b)
Front view(c)
Top view(d)
Side viewFigure 2
Profile ofH(z) from the surface of the core.Figure 3
Top view ofE core transformer with windings.Energy stored in the magnetic field in the secondary shorted transformer is equated to energy stored in leakage inductor, which is given in (1).The volume represented with purple color in Figure4 is considered for volume integration. This constitutes (i) the volume occupied by the coils and (ii) the volume formed by extrusion of the coils along the centre limb of the core, excluding the volume of the core. The flux extends into air shown in Figure 5. The volume shown in Figure 4 is divided into four parts, whose top view is shown in Figure 3. The profile of H-field is calculated using Ampere's law, the same profile is observed in FEM analysis. The H-profile is expressed mathematically in (2):(2)H(z)={Hmzh10<z<h1,Hmh1<z<h1+t,Hm(h1+h2+t-zh2)h1+t<z<h1+h2+t.Figure 4
Volume around the core considered for integration.Figure 5
Scaled side view to show the flux that extends into air.UsingH-profile given in (2) to evaluate volume integral given in (1), we get expression of the leakage inductance:(3)Lleak=13μoN12F2(h+2t)[FC+B(E+2h)],
where h=h1+h2+t is total thickness of the winding measured from the surface of the core to the outer surface of the outer winding, t is total thickness of the insulation used between the layers. B, C, E, F is are the dimensions of the E core shown in Figure 6.Figure 6
E core dimensions given in data sheets.It is seen in [8, 11–13], by sandwiching the windings, leakage inductance reduces by p2 times, where p is the number of interfaces between primary and secondary [8]:(4)Lleak=13p2μoN12F2(h+2t)[FC+B(E+2h)].


## 3. Experimental Results

Three different samples are made to validate the derived expression. The results are compared with the expressions available in literature. The expression given in [8, 10, 11] is replaced with the dimensions of the core (shown in Figure 6) and the dimensions of windings will give (5):(5)Lleak,earlier=13p2μoN12F2(h+2t)F(C+E+2h).Sample no. 1 is made withE core (EE42/21/15) wound with stranded conductor made with three conductors of 24 SWG. With interwinding insulation of thickness 1.27 mm is used. Standard winding configuration as shown in Table 1 is used to wind primary and secondary.Table 1
EE core transformer with interwinding insulation.
Sample no.12Core typeEE42/21/15EE65/38/13F14.45 mm22.65 mmC15.20 mm13.45 mmB21.10 mm32.59 mmE12.05 mm19.77 mmh1 thickness of primary3.20 mm3.81 mmh2 thickness of secondary1.90 mm1.55 mmt thickness of insulation1.27 mm2.00 mmN13448N21724PhotographLeakage inductanceLleak,earlier from (5)11.91μH22.52μHLeakage inductanceLleak from (3)15.32μH28.21μHLeakage inductanceLexp  at 10 kHz measured14.13μH26.76μH% deviation ofLexp from calculated Lleak,earlier15.71%15.84%% deviation ofLexp from calculated Lleak8.38%5.12%Sample no. 2 is made withE core (EE65/38/13) wound with stranded conductor made with three conductors of 24 SWG. With interwinding insulation of thickness 2.00 mm. Standard winding configuration as shown in Table 1 is used to wind primary and secondary.Sample no. 3 is made withE core (EE42/21/15) wound with stranded conductor made with two conductors of 24 SWG. With total interwinding insulation of thickness 0.46 mm + 0.26 mm = 0.72 mm is used. Sandwiched winding configuration as shown in Table 2 is used to wind primary and secondary.Table 2
EE core transformer with sandwiched winding (P/2, S, P/2).
Sample no.3Core typeEE42/21/15F14.45 mmC15.20 mmB21.10 mmE12.05 mmh1 thickness of primary half1.41 mmh2 thickness of secondary2.93 mmh3 thickness of primary half1.52 mmt1 thickness of insulation0.46 mmt2 thickness of insulation0.26 mmN146N244PhotographLeakage inductanceLleak,earlier from (5)4.94μHLeakage inductanceLleak from (4)6.37μHLeakage inductanceLexp at 10 kHz measured5.91μH% deviation ofLexp from calculated Lleak,earlier16.41%% deviation ofLexp from calculated Lleak7.82%All the measurements for leakage inductance are made by shorting the secondary. The measurements are made with LCR meter (make: Gw instek Model: LCR-8101) at 10 kHz.Tables1 and 2 tabulate experimentally measured values, estimated values using the expression derived in this paper and expression derived earlier for leakage inductance and their corresponding errors when compared with the experimentally measured values.


## 4. Conclusion

In this paper an improved expression for leakage inductance has been derived, using energy method. To observe theH-field pattern, FEM analysis has been carried out on a secondary shorted transformer, with primary excited. Experimental results show that the formula derived in this paper has better accuracy. It is observed that the leakage inductance estimated using improved expression Lleak has less deviation from Lexp when compared with leakage inductance estimated from earlier expression Lleak,earlier. The accuracy of the estimated value is improved due to consideration of flux that is extending into air.



---

*Source: 635715-2012-08-09.xml*