# Preparation and Characterization of Ni(OH)2 and NiO Mesoporous Nanosheets

Authors: Changyu Li; Shouxin Liu
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

Mesoporous nanosheets of single-crystallineβ-nickel hydroxide (β-Ni(OH)2) were successfully synthesized via a facile hydrothermal method using Ni(NO3)2 · 6H2O as precursor in a mixed solution of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate (SDBS). Single-crystalline nickel oxide (NiO) mesoporous nanosheets can be obtained through a thermal decomposition method using β-Ni(OH)2 mesoporous nanosheets as precursor. The influences of SDBS and hydrothermal treatment were carefully investigated; the results showed that they played important roles in the formation of β-Ni(OH)2 mesoporous nanosheets. The as-obtained β-Ni(OH)2 and NiO were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), thermal gravity-differential thermal analysis (TG-DTA), and specific surface area, and pore size test.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The development of nanomaterials is attracting increasing attentions due to their unique physical and chemical properties that are different from conventional bulk materials. It is well known that the size, morphology, and structure of nanomaterials significantly influence their physical and chemical properties and, therefore, their applications [1–3]. The nanomaterials with mesoporous structures Especially have technical advances in various fields, such as adsorption, separation, catalysis, drug delivery, sensors, photonics, and nanodevices [4, 5].As reported, nickel hydroxide (Ni(OH)2) has attracted increasing interests due to its applications in alkaline rechargeable batteries (such as Ni/MH, Ni/Zn, Ni/Cd, and Ni/Fe, [6–8]), which are most widely used in many applications ranging from power tools to portable electronics and electric vehicles [9]. There are two phases of Ni(OH)2, known as α-Ni(OH)2 and β-Ni(OH)2. Single-crystalline β-Ni(OH)2 nanosheets have been demonstrated taking advantage of its intrinsic lamellar structure [9–11] and widely used due to its high stacking density and stability in alkaline condition compared with α-Ni(OH)2. Recently, some reports have demonstrated that Ni(OH)2 with a smaller crystalline size and more crystalline defects possesses a higher chemical proton diffusion coefficient, and this will diminish the concentration polarization of protons during charge/discharge cycle, leading to a better charge/discharge cycling behavior [12]. Literatures have reported that the activity of Ni(OH)2 electrode could be significantly improved when nanosized Ni(OH)2 was added into microsized Ni(OH)2 [13, 14]; especially, nanosized Ni(OH)2 with mesoporous structures can enhance the electrochemical performance greatly [15]. Furthermore, NiO is a very important p-type semiconductor with a direct band gap of 3.5 eV and often used as catalyst, electrochemical capacitor, fuel cell electrode, gas sensor, and so forth [16–18]. NiO can be obtained by calcinating the corresponding Ni(OH)2 simply in air, and the shape of Ni(OH)2 particles could be maintained [19]. To date, numerous works [20–24] have been developed to synthesize Ni(OH)2 with different morphologies because the electrochemical performances of Ni(OH)2 are directly affected by its morphology and size [25–27]. Chen and Gao [10] reported the synthesis of different morphologies of nickel hydroxide through using ethanol as growth media. Meyer et al. [11] synthesized platelet-like nanoparticles of nickel hydroxide. Matsui et al. [28] obtained Ni(OH)2 nanorods using carbon-coated anodic alumina film in hydrothermal conditions. However, to obtain well-defined Ni(OH)2 nanostructures with mesoporous structure is still the challenge in nanochemistry and nanomaterials.Herein, we demonstrate a facile method for the synthesis of single-crystalβ-Ni(OH)2 mesoporous nanosheets, and NiO mesoporous nanosheets can also be obtained through the thermal decomposition using the as-prepared β-Ni(OH)2 as precursor.


## 2. Experimental

All of the reagents, except SDBS (chemical purity), were of analytical grade and used as received without further purification. In a typical experiment, 0.370 g Ni(NO3)2 · 6H2O and 0.930 g SDBS were dissolved in 80 mL distilled water under magnetic stirring for 15 min to form a homogeneous solution at room temperature, and then 0.170 g NaOH was added into the solution. Afterward, the solution was transferred into a 100 mL Teflon-lined stainless autoclave, sealed and maintained at 140°C for 24 h, and then cooled to room temperature naturally. The products were collected, washed several times with distilled water and absolute ethanol, and dried at 60°C in air. To study the influences of SDBS and hydrothermal treatment on the formation of β-Ni(OH)2 nanosheets, parallel experiments were carried out with keeping other reaction conditions unchanged.As-preparedβ-Ni(OH)2 was calcined in air at 400°C for 2 h to produce NiO.X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the prepared samples were recorded on a D/max-r B X-ray diffractometer with graphite-monochromatized CuKα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å), employing a scanning rate of 4°/min in the range from 15° to 90°. The size and morphology of the products were characterized by H-7650 transmission electron microscopy (TEM). High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM, Tecnai F30) with the selected area of electron-diffraction (SAED) was employed to investigate the detailed structure of β-Ni(OH)2 microstructures. The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) pore size distribution were investigated on a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 equipment. TG-DSC (a Pyris Diamond thermogravimetric/DSC apparatus) was used to analyze the thermal behavior of samples with a heating rate of 10°C/min from room temperature to 600°C in air.


## 3. Results and Discussion

In Figure1, curve (a) shows the XRD pattern of β-Ni(OH)2 prepared by the typical method. All diffraction peaks can be indexed to the pure hexagonal phase of β-Ni(OH)2 (JCPDS, file No. 14-0117). No peaks from impurities are observed, indicating that the product was pure phase. Curve (b) shows the XRD pattern of the β-Ni(OH)2 sample prepared in the absence of SDBS, from which, it is obvious to see the intensity change of some peaks compared with curve (a). Curve (c) is the XRD pattern of Ni(OH)2 prepared at room temperature. As shown, the Bragg reflections are broad, indicating that this sample has small size and poor crystallinity. According to curve (a) and curve (c), it proves that hydrothermal treatment plays an important role in improving their crystallinity. This result is consistent with the literature [29, 30].Figure 1
XRD patterns of the preparedβ-Ni(OH)2 samples: (a) with using SDBS; (b) without using SDBS; (c) without hydrothermal treatment.As known, the morphology and size of nanoparticles prepared by hydrothermal methods could be well-controlled by the addition of certain surfactant. Many theories have also been proposed to describe the mechanism of the shape-revolution process; however, they did not carry much conviction. From the difference between curve (a) and (b) in Figure1, it can be concluded that all diffraction peak directions, except for [001] direction, are suppressed with the addition of SDBS. In other words, the prepared β-Ni(OH)2 has a preferential [001] growth direction in the presence of SDBS. It is well known that the surfactant in solution will aggregate into micelles. During the reaction, the micelles play the roles of “seeds;” the originally produced clusters will aggregate on the micelles, and further grow to nanoproducts, which can be called a special soft template technique to synthesize nanowires [31]. In our case, this process slows down the reaction rate of Ni2+ and OH− and determines the preferential growth direction of β-Ni(OH)2 nanoparticles.Figure2 shows the TEM images of the β-Ni(OH)2 products obtained from different reaction conditions. As indicated in Figure 2(a), the obtained β-Ni(OH)2 products are irregular hexagonal shapes with sharp edges and the edge sizes are in the range of 25–160 nm. The rod-like structures are formed because of some sheets being on edge in the grid. Figure 2(b) shows the TEM image of β-Ni(OH)2 nanosheets prepared without the presence of SDBS, indicating the smaller size. Figure 2(c) shows the product obtained without the hydrothermal treatment, from which we can see that the sample has an irregular shape and a poor crystallized structure. The results indicate that hydrothermal treatment plays an important role in the formation of β-Ni(OH)2 nanosheets; coinciding with the literature [32].TEM images of theβ-Ni(OH)2 nanosheets prepared: (a) in the presence of SDBS, (b) without using SDBS, and (c) without hydrothermal treatment.
(a)(b)(c)Figure3(a) gives the magnified TEM image of the β-Ni(OH)2 nanosheets, the bright spots on the surface of the sheets reveal the porous structure. As shown in SEAD pattern (inset of Figure 3(a)), the as-prepared β-Ni(OH)2 nanosheets are single crystals of hexagonal phase, and the surfaces of these hexagonal β-Ni(OH)2 nanosheets are the (001) planes. Figure 3(b) exhibits the HRTEM image of the β-Ni(OH)2 nanosheets, from which we can see that the crystal lattice planes are perfectly aligned. The lattice space of about 1.50 Å corresponds to the interplanar spacing of (003) planes, indicating that the β-Ni(OH)2 nanosheets have a preferential [001] growth direction, consistent with the result of XRD as well.(a) TEM and (b) HRTEM images ofβ-Ni(OH)2 mesoporous nanosheets. Inset of (a) is the corresponding SAED pattern.
(a)(b)The thermal property of theβ-Ni(OH)2 nanosheets was analyzed by TG-DSC, and the variations of heat and weight while β-Ni(OH)2 was being sintered are recorded. As shown in Figure 4, there is an endothermic peak at 336.2°C in the DSC curve, accompanied by a weight loss of 18.81% (observed in TG curve at the same temperature), resulting from the thermal decomposition of β-Ni(OH)2. When β-Ni(OH)2 sample was heated to above 336.2°C, we can not observe any obvious endothermic or exothermic peak in the DSC curve. The slight mass change between 336.2 and 500°C is due to the desorption of oxygen from bulk NiO, and we can conclude that β-Ni(OH)2 precursor could be decomposed to NiO above 336.2°C completely. The observed weight loss of 18.81% is close to the calculated loss value of 19.4%.Figure 4
TG-DSC curves ofβ-Ni(OH)2 mesoporous nanosheets.Based on the TG and DSC results, in our experiments, the as-preparedβ-Ni(OH)2 nanosheets were calcined at 400°C for 2 h to obtain NiO nanosheets. Figure 5 gives the XRD pattern of NiO powder. All the diffraction peaks can be indexed to a face-centered cubic phase NiO with lattice parameters a=4.17 (JCPDS, file No. 78-0643), and no diffraction peaks of Ni(OH)2 or other impurities were observed, indicating that β-Ni(OH)2 has been converted to NiO completely.Figure 5
XRD pattern of the NiO mesoporous nanosheets.The size and morphology of the as-prepared NiO were examined by TEM. Figure6(a) exhibits the TEM image of NiO, showing that the shape of nanosheets was maintained after the thermal decomposition of β-Ni(OH)2. The corresponding SAED pattern of NiO nanosheets (inset in Figure 6(a)) exhibits many spots, indicating the nature of single crystal. The diffraction pattern can be indexed to the face-centered cubic NiO, consistent with the XRD result. Figure 6(b) is the HRTEM image of the as-prepared NiO nanosheets. As shown in it, the crystal lattice planes are perfectly aligned, and the lattice space is about 2.09 Å, corresponding to the interplanar spacing of 200 planes for cubic NiO. This reveals that the growth of the nanosheets follows the 200 direction; in other words, the nanosheets grow along with the a axis.(a) TEM and (b) HRTEM images of NiO mesoporous nanosheets. Inset of (a) is the corresponding SAED pattern.
(a)(b)TEM images ofβ-Ni(OH)2 and NiO (Figure 3(a) and Figure 6(a)) reveal their mesoporous structure by the wormhole-like porous structure on the surfaces of the sheets, then the mesoporous structures and pore sizes of β-Ni(OH)2 and NiO were investigated by the N2 adsorption/desorption techniques. The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and BJH pore size distribution profiles (inset in Figures 7(a) and 7(b)) of β-Ni(OH)2 and NiO were shown in Figure 7. It is obvious that these isotherms can be closely related to IV-type isotherm, characteristic of mesoporous materials. The BET surface area of mesoporous β-Ni(OH)2 nanosheets is 46.6 m2 g−1, and the pore size distribution is peaked at around 2 nm (inset in Figure 7(a)). For NiO mesoporous nanosheets (mesoporous Ni(OH)2 calcinated at 400°C for 2 h), the BET surface areas and the pore size distribution increase to 85.98 m2 g−1 and 3.7 nm, respectively.N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm and pore size distribution (insets) of (a) β-Ni(OH)2 and (b) NiO nanosheets.
(a)(b)


## 4. Conclusion

In summary, a progressive production ofβ-Ni(OH)2 mesoporous nanosheets with single-crystalline structure has been constructed via a one-step SDBS-assisted hydrothermal route. Using the obtained β-Ni(OH)2 nanosheets as precursors, NiO nanosheets could be obtained by the calcination at 400°C for 2 h. The results of some parallel experiments show that surfactant SDBS and hydrothermal treatment have important effect on the formation of β-Ni(OH)2 nanosheets. The N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms and BJH pore size distribution profiles of β-Ni(OH)2 and NiO confirm their mesoporous structure.



---

*Source: 648012-2011-12-29.xml*