# Niosome Encapsulation of Curcumin: Characterization and Cytotoxic Effect on Ovarian Cancer Cells

Authors: Ying-Qi Xu; Wen-Rong Chen; Jonathan K. Tsosie; Xi Xie; Peng Li; Jian-Bo Wan; Cheng-Wei He; Mei-Wan Chen
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

Curcumin, a natural chemical compound found inCurcuma longa, has been applied in multiple medicinal areas from antibiotic to antitumor treatment. However, the chemical structure of curcumin results in poor stability, low solubility, and rapid degradationin vivo, hindering its clinical utilization. To address these issues, we have developed a novel niosome system composed of nonionic surfactants: Span 80, Tween 80, and Poloxamer 188. Curcumin was encapsulated in the niosomes with a high entrapment efficiency of 92.3
±
0.4%. This system provided controlled release of curcumin, thereby improving its therapeutic capability. Dynamic dialysis was conducted to evaluate thein vitro drug release of curcumin-niosomes. Curcumin-niosomes exhibited enhanced cytotoxic activity and apoptotic rate against ovarian cancer A2780 cells compared with freely dispersed curcumin. These results demonstrate that the curcumin-niosome system is a promising strategy for the delivery of curcumin and ovarian cancer therapy.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Curcumin (C21H20O6) is a natural yellow compound typically found inCurcuma longa that is regarded as a natural polyphenolic antioxidant presented in many kinds of herbs [1]. Curcumin has been exhibited multiple therapeutic relevance including anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antimicrobial, antirheumatic, and hepatoprotective activities [2]. In particular, the anticancer property of curcumin is responsible for the downregulation of a variety of transcription factors such as AP-1, NF-κB, and β-catenin [2, 3]. Its anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antiangiogenic, antineoplastic, and chemosensitizing effects make it a potent candidate in the treatment for multiple types of cancer [4, 5]. In spite of the well-received pharmacological properties, the therapeutic application of curcumin has been impeded by its shortcomings such as low aqueous solubility at acidic and physiological pH and its degradability in alkaline conditions [1, 6]. In addition, poor absorption and rapid metabolism of curcumin severely limit its bioavailability [7]. As a result, researchers have been exploring methods for the effective delivery of curcumin with novel formulations including liposomes [8], micelles [9], conjugates [10], nanoparticles [11], and nanoglobules [12].Recent developments of nanotechnology and nanomedicine have generated many promising drug delivery systems [13–15]. Niosomes are nonionic surfactant vesicles with a bilayer structure, which have been used to deliver various drug elements including chemotherapeutic agents, genes, hormones, antigens, and peptides [16, 17]. Niosomes share some similarities with liposomes but are composed of nonionic surfactants such as Span 80, Span 60, Span 40, Span 20, Tween 80, and Pluronic 188 instead of phospholipids used in liposomes [18, 19]. Typically, niosomes are produced from two main components: nonionic surfactants and additives [20]. While nonionic surfactants serve as the vesicular layer, the additives such as cholesterol act to enhance the rigidity of the bilayer. This carrier system provides protection of the drug molecule from degradation and inactivation caused by immunological and pharmacological effects. Similar to liposomes, niosomes exhibit superior cellular membrane permeation via osmosis and provide excellent biocompatibility due to their cell membrane-like components. In addition, niosomes surpass liposomes through low production cost and room-temperature chemical storage requirements. In recent years, niosomes are becoming increasingly accepted as an alternative method of drug delivery to liposomes, particularly for drugs with poor stability, low solubility, or rapid degradation [17]. For instance, candesartan cilexetil, a commercially marketed compound that has low bioavailability (15%), was loaded inside niosomes composed of Pluronic P85 and Span 60. The niosomes significantly enhanced aqueous solubility and oral bioavailability [21].The present study seeks to effectively deliver curcumin to tumor sites using niosomes composed of nonionic surfactants Tween 80 and Pluronic 188, in order to improve the solubility and the therapeutic effects of curcumin. The synthesis of curcumin-loaded niosomes (curcumin-niosomes) and the physicochemical properties in terms of particle size, zeta potential, andin vitro drug release were investigated. Furthermore, thein vitro cytotoxicity and therapeutic effects against human ovarian cancer A2780 cell line were evaluated.


## 2. Material and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

Poloxamer 188 was purchased from BASF SE (Germany). Span 80 and Tween 80 were obtained from Damao Chemical Reagent (Tianjin, China). Poloxamer 188 was obtained from BASF SE (Germany); sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was purchased from Beyotime Biotechnology (Jiangsu, China). Sephadex G50 was obtained from Seebio Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Curcumin was purchased from Huabiao Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Tianjin, China). DMEM culture medium, fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin-streptomycin (PS), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 0.25% (w/v) trypsin/EDTA, propidium iodide (PI), and Hoechst 33342 were obtained from Life Technologies (Grand Island, USA). 3-[4,5-Dimethyl-2-thiazolyl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) was obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All water used was pretreated with a Milli-Q apparatus (Millipore Corporation, Darmstadt, Germany). All other chemicals used were of analytical grade.


### 2.2. Preparation of Curcumin-Niosome

Curcumin-niosomes were prepared using solvent evaporation. A mixture of surfactants (0.05 g of Span 80, 0.05 g of Poloxamer 188, and 0.15 g of Tween 80, in a weight ratio of 1 : 1 : 3) was accurately measured and dissolved in 100μL of anhydrous ethanol. Curcumin (3.75 mg) was added to the surfactant solution and mixed thoroughly by ultrasonication and was vortexed at 40–50°C such that clear claret-colored miscible substance was obtained. The resultant substance was added drop by drop into 25 mL preheated (75–80°C) distilled water. The solution was then mixed via magnetic stirring so that the surfactants were completely dissolved. The hydration process was conducted by stirring the solution for 20–30 min at 40–50°C and the curcumin-niosomes were gradually formed. The niosomes were homogenized under various high-pressure settings to improve niosome nanodispersity while avoiding sample contamination [22].


### 2.3. Characterization of Curcumin-Niosome

#### 2.3.1. Particle Size and Zeta Potential

The average particle size and zeta potential of curcumin-niosome were determined using dynamic light scattering (DLS) Zetasizer using Zetasizer Nano ZSP system (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK) at 25°C. Diameter, particle dispersion index (PDI), and zeta potential were obtained based on at least three measurements. The morphology of curcumin-niosome was examined using a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (JEM-1400, Japan). The sample was deposited on an amorphous carbon-coated copper grid and stained with the phosphotungstic acid solution (2%, w/v) for 30 s. TEM images were performed at an accelerating voltage of 120 kV.


#### 2.3.2. Drug Encapsulation Efficiency (EE%)

The EE% of curcumin in niosomes was determined using size exclusion chromatography. Microcolumn gel was produced by filling and hydrating Sephadex G50 superfine beads in a 5 mL syringe (filled to 2.2 cm). The microcolumn gel was dehydrated to approximately 0.7 mL by centrifugation for 2 min at a rotational speed of 900 rpm, forming a 2.0 cm microcolumn. The sample (100μL) was added to the microcolumn and centrifuged for 2 min (900 r/min) to dehydrate the whole 100 μL sample. This was followed by repeated eluted processes of 100 μL distilled water under the same conditions. The eluate was collected and the niosome concentrations were determined with liquid phase assay. The EE% of curcumin in curcumin-niosomes was calculated by applying the following equation:(1)
E
E
%
=
W
i
n
i
t
i
a
l
-
W
f
r
e
e
W
i
n
i
t
i
a
l
.


#### 2.3.3.In Vitro Drug Release

The release assay was performed to assess the amount of curcumin released from niosomes vesicles.In vitro drug release of curcumin-niosomes was determined using dialysis membrane processing [23]. Curcumin-niosomes (5 mL) were placed into a preswelled dialysis bag with a molecular weight cut-off at 8,000 Dalton and curcumin was allowed to release into medium composed of 0.5% of SDS. The medium was incubated at 37°C and mixed at 100 rpm. Medium samples (2 mL) were collected after 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 h of incubation. Each collected sample was replaced with 2 mL of fresh medium. The medium samples were promptly filtrated and analyzed using HPLC with a C18 reverse-phase liquid chromatography column (250 × 4.6 mm) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min at the maximum absorption wavelength of 426 nm to determine the concentration of released curcumin. The mobile phases consisted of acetonitrile/0.1% acetic acid (60/40, v/v). Each experiment was repeated in triplicate.


### 2.4. Cell Lines and Cell Culture

Human ovarian cancer A2780 cells were obtained from KeyGen Biotech (Nanjing, China). The cells were cultured in DMEM with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated FBS and antibodies (100 U/mL penicillin, 100μg/mL streptomycin) at 37°C. The cells were cultured in an incubator with a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C under 5% CO2.


### 2.5. Cellular Uptake Study

The native green fluorescence of curcumin and curcumin-niosomes was used to determine cellular internalization in A2780 cells using flow cytometry [24]. A2780 cells were incubated with free curcumin and curcumin-niosomes at a concentration of 12.5 μM. After incubation for 1, 2, and 4 h, the medium was removed and the cells were carefully washed three times with PBS. The cells were then removed using trypsin and were subsequently washed twice with PBS. The intracellular curcumin fluorescence was quantified with flow cytometry (FACScan, BD, San Jose, CA) [25]. A total of 10,000 cells were collected, amplified, and scaled to generate a single parameter histogram.


### 2.6. Cell Viability Assay

A2780 cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 5,000 in 100μL of medium per well. When reaching approximately 80% confluence, the cells were treated with a series of concentrations of free curcumin and curcumin-niosomes for 24 h, respectively. Cell viability was determined with MTT assay, where the cells were incubated with medium containing 1 mg/mL of MTT for 4 h, followed by dissolving formazan crystals in 100 μL of DMSO. Cell viability was evaluated using a 570 nm microplate reader (SpectraMax M5, Molecular Devices, USA). The results were analyzed according to three independent biological replicates.


### 2.7. Cell Cycle Analysis

The cell cycle distribution was evaluated as previously described [26]. A2780 cells (2.0 × 105 cells) were treated with free curcumin, blank niosomes without curcumin, and curcumin-niosomes, respectively, and incubated for 24 h. These cells were then harvested, washed twice with PBS for 5 min by centrifugation, and fixed in 70% ethanol at −20°C overnight. The collected cells were stained with 100 μL of PI stain solution (30 μg/mL PI, 8 μg/mL RNase) for 30 min while protected from light. Analysis was conducted using a flow cytometer (BD FACSCanto™, BD Biosciences, San Jose, USA). The cell distributions in phases of SubG1, G0/G1, S, and G2/M were calculated using ModFit LT software (version 3.0, Verity, USA). The results were analyzed based on three independent replicates.


### 2.8. Assessment of Apoptosis

An Annexin V FITC/PI apoptosis detection kit (BD Biosciences) was used to detect cell apoptosis. A2780 cells were exposed to 12.5μM of free curcumin and curcumin-niosomes. After incubation for 24 h, A2780 cells were trypsinized with EDTA-free trypsin and collected by centrifugation, washed twice with cold PBS, and gently resuspended in a binding buffer. The cells were stained with 5 μL of Annexin-FITC and 5 μL of PI in the dark for 15 min, after which they were analyzed with a flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). All experiments were conducted in triplicate.


### 2.9. Statistics

The results were expressed as the mean ± SD. Each value is the mean of at least three independent experiments in each group. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’st-test. A significance value of p
<
0.05 was used to indicate significant difference.


## 2.1. Materials

Poloxamer 188 was purchased from BASF SE (Germany). Span 80 and Tween 80 were obtained from Damao Chemical Reagent (Tianjin, China). Poloxamer 188 was obtained from BASF SE (Germany); sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was purchased from Beyotime Biotechnology (Jiangsu, China). Sephadex G50 was obtained from Seebio Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Curcumin was purchased from Huabiao Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Tianjin, China). DMEM culture medium, fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin-streptomycin (PS), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 0.25% (w/v) trypsin/EDTA, propidium iodide (PI), and Hoechst 33342 were obtained from Life Technologies (Grand Island, USA). 3-[4,5-Dimethyl-2-thiazolyl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) was obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All water used was pretreated with a Milli-Q apparatus (Millipore Corporation, Darmstadt, Germany). All other chemicals used were of analytical grade.


## 2.2. Preparation of Curcumin-Niosome

Curcumin-niosomes were prepared using solvent evaporation. A mixture of surfactants (0.05 g of Span 80, 0.05 g of Poloxamer 188, and 0.15 g of Tween 80, in a weight ratio of 1 : 1 : 3) was accurately measured and dissolved in 100μL of anhydrous ethanol. Curcumin (3.75 mg) was added to the surfactant solution and mixed thoroughly by ultrasonication and was vortexed at 40–50°C such that clear claret-colored miscible substance was obtained. The resultant substance was added drop by drop into 25 mL preheated (75–80°C) distilled water. The solution was then mixed via magnetic stirring so that the surfactants were completely dissolved. The hydration process was conducted by stirring the solution for 20–30 min at 40–50°C and the curcumin-niosomes were gradually formed. The niosomes were homogenized under various high-pressure settings to improve niosome nanodispersity while avoiding sample contamination [22].


## 2.3. Characterization of Curcumin-Niosome

### 2.3.1. Particle Size and Zeta Potential

The average particle size and zeta potential of curcumin-niosome were determined using dynamic light scattering (DLS) Zetasizer using Zetasizer Nano ZSP system (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK) at 25°C. Diameter, particle dispersion index (PDI), and zeta potential were obtained based on at least three measurements. The morphology of curcumin-niosome was examined using a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (JEM-1400, Japan). The sample was deposited on an amorphous carbon-coated copper grid and stained with the phosphotungstic acid solution (2%, w/v) for 30 s. TEM images were performed at an accelerating voltage of 120 kV.


### 2.3.2. Drug Encapsulation Efficiency (EE%)

The EE% of curcumin in niosomes was determined using size exclusion chromatography. Microcolumn gel was produced by filling and hydrating Sephadex G50 superfine beads in a 5 mL syringe (filled to 2.2 cm). The microcolumn gel was dehydrated to approximately 0.7 mL by centrifugation for 2 min at a rotational speed of 900 rpm, forming a 2.0 cm microcolumn. The sample (100μL) was added to the microcolumn and centrifuged for 2 min (900 r/min) to dehydrate the whole 100 μL sample. This was followed by repeated eluted processes of 100 μL distilled water under the same conditions. The eluate was collected and the niosome concentrations were determined with liquid phase assay. The EE% of curcumin in curcumin-niosomes was calculated by applying the following equation:(1)
E
E
%
=
W
i
n
i
t
i
a
l
-
W
f
r
e
e
W
i
n
i
t
i
a
l
.


### 2.3.3.In Vitro Drug Release

The release assay was performed to assess the amount of curcumin released from niosomes vesicles.In vitro drug release of curcumin-niosomes was determined using dialysis membrane processing [23]. Curcumin-niosomes (5 mL) were placed into a preswelled dialysis bag with a molecular weight cut-off at 8,000 Dalton and curcumin was allowed to release into medium composed of 0.5% of SDS. The medium was incubated at 37°C and mixed at 100 rpm. Medium samples (2 mL) were collected after 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 h of incubation. Each collected sample was replaced with 2 mL of fresh medium. The medium samples were promptly filtrated and analyzed using HPLC with a C18 reverse-phase liquid chromatography column (250 × 4.6 mm) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min at the maximum absorption wavelength of 426 nm to determine the concentration of released curcumin. The mobile phases consisted of acetonitrile/0.1% acetic acid (60/40, v/v). Each experiment was repeated in triplicate.


## 2.3.1. Particle Size and Zeta Potential

The average particle size and zeta potential of curcumin-niosome were determined using dynamic light scattering (DLS) Zetasizer using Zetasizer Nano ZSP system (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK) at 25°C. Diameter, particle dispersion index (PDI), and zeta potential were obtained based on at least three measurements. The morphology of curcumin-niosome was examined using a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (JEM-1400, Japan). The sample was deposited on an amorphous carbon-coated copper grid and stained with the phosphotungstic acid solution (2%, w/v) for 30 s. TEM images were performed at an accelerating voltage of 120 kV.


## 2.3.2. Drug Encapsulation Efficiency (EE%)

The EE% of curcumin in niosomes was determined using size exclusion chromatography. Microcolumn gel was produced by filling and hydrating Sephadex G50 superfine beads in a 5 mL syringe (filled to 2.2 cm). The microcolumn gel was dehydrated to approximately 0.7 mL by centrifugation for 2 min at a rotational speed of 900 rpm, forming a 2.0 cm microcolumn. The sample (100μL) was added to the microcolumn and centrifuged for 2 min (900 r/min) to dehydrate the whole 100 μL sample. This was followed by repeated eluted processes of 100 μL distilled water under the same conditions. The eluate was collected and the niosome concentrations were determined with liquid phase assay. The EE% of curcumin in curcumin-niosomes was calculated by applying the following equation:(1)
E
E
%
=
W
i
n
i
t
i
a
l
-
W
f
r
e
e
W
i
n
i
t
i
a
l
.


## 2.3.3.In Vitro Drug Release

The release assay was performed to assess the amount of curcumin released from niosomes vesicles.In vitro drug release of curcumin-niosomes was determined using dialysis membrane processing [23]. Curcumin-niosomes (5 mL) were placed into a preswelled dialysis bag with a molecular weight cut-off at 8,000 Dalton and curcumin was allowed to release into medium composed of 0.5% of SDS. The medium was incubated at 37°C and mixed at 100 rpm. Medium samples (2 mL) were collected after 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 h of incubation. Each collected sample was replaced with 2 mL of fresh medium. The medium samples were promptly filtrated and analyzed using HPLC with a C18 reverse-phase liquid chromatography column (250 × 4.6 mm) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min at the maximum absorption wavelength of 426 nm to determine the concentration of released curcumin. The mobile phases consisted of acetonitrile/0.1% acetic acid (60/40, v/v). Each experiment was repeated in triplicate.


## 2.4. Cell Lines and Cell Culture

Human ovarian cancer A2780 cells were obtained from KeyGen Biotech (Nanjing, China). The cells were cultured in DMEM with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated FBS and antibodies (100 U/mL penicillin, 100μg/mL streptomycin) at 37°C. The cells were cultured in an incubator with a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C under 5% CO2.


## 2.5. Cellular Uptake Study

The native green fluorescence of curcumin and curcumin-niosomes was used to determine cellular internalization in A2780 cells using flow cytometry [24]. A2780 cells were incubated with free curcumin and curcumin-niosomes at a concentration of 12.5 μM. After incubation for 1, 2, and 4 h, the medium was removed and the cells were carefully washed three times with PBS. The cells were then removed using trypsin and were subsequently washed twice with PBS. The intracellular curcumin fluorescence was quantified with flow cytometry (FACScan, BD, San Jose, CA) [25]. A total of 10,000 cells were collected, amplified, and scaled to generate a single parameter histogram.


## 2.6. Cell Viability Assay

A2780 cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 5,000 in 100μL of medium per well. When reaching approximately 80% confluence, the cells were treated with a series of concentrations of free curcumin and curcumin-niosomes for 24 h, respectively. Cell viability was determined with MTT assay, where the cells were incubated with medium containing 1 mg/mL of MTT for 4 h, followed by dissolving formazan crystals in 100 μL of DMSO. Cell viability was evaluated using a 570 nm microplate reader (SpectraMax M5, Molecular Devices, USA). The results were analyzed according to three independent biological replicates.


## 2.7. Cell Cycle Analysis

The cell cycle distribution was evaluated as previously described [26]. A2780 cells (2.0 × 105 cells) were treated with free curcumin, blank niosomes without curcumin, and curcumin-niosomes, respectively, and incubated for 24 h. These cells were then harvested, washed twice with PBS for 5 min by centrifugation, and fixed in 70% ethanol at −20°C overnight. The collected cells were stained with 100 μL of PI stain solution (30 μg/mL PI, 8 μg/mL RNase) for 30 min while protected from light. Analysis was conducted using a flow cytometer (BD FACSCanto™, BD Biosciences, San Jose, USA). The cell distributions in phases of SubG1, G0/G1, S, and G2/M were calculated using ModFit LT software (version 3.0, Verity, USA). The results were analyzed based on three independent replicates.


## 2.8. Assessment of Apoptosis

An Annexin V FITC/PI apoptosis detection kit (BD Biosciences) was used to detect cell apoptosis. A2780 cells were exposed to 12.5μM of free curcumin and curcumin-niosomes. After incubation for 24 h, A2780 cells were trypsinized with EDTA-free trypsin and collected by centrifugation, washed twice with cold PBS, and gently resuspended in a binding buffer. The cells were stained with 5 μL of Annexin-FITC and 5 μL of PI in the dark for 15 min, after which they were analyzed with a flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). All experiments were conducted in triplicate.


## 2.9. Statistics

The results were expressed as the mean ± SD. Each value is the mean of at least three independent experiments in each group. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’st-test. A significance value of p
<
0.05 was used to indicate significant difference.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Characterization of Curcumin-Niosome

The curcumin-niosomes were successfully prepared. TEM image showed that curcumin-niosomes had homogeneous spherical shapes and smooth surfaces without aggregation (Figure1). The diameters of the blank niosomes and the curcumin-niosomes decreased as the pressure of the applied homogenization increased. Interestingly, the diameter and zeta potential of the curcumin-niosomes were smaller than those of the blank niosomes under the same pressure of homogenization (Figure 1). Two reasons may be responsible for this phenomenon. First, curcumin is believed to bind with the lipophilic segments of surfactant, resulting in a more compact curcumin-niosome structure and particle size. This may be due to a favorable lipid-soluble associative region provided by the surfactants. Second, the potential of blank niosomes fluctuated around 30 mV, which was related to the high-strength friction during the process of pressure homogenization. However, when curcumin was loaded, the potential value of the particles was slightly decreased, which may be due to the free curcumin distributed in the water phase or potential diffusion layer. The DLS analysis revealed that the mean diameter of curcumin-niosomes was 84.15
±
4.03 nm at the homogenization pressure of 800 bar with the drug EE% of 92.3%, indicating the successful loading of curcumin into niosomes. The size of the niosomes is appropriate for tumor specific accumulation via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect [27]. Additionally, after niosome storage at 4°C for over 3 months, there was less than 20 nm size increase, suggesting that curcumin-niosomes were stable over storage.Figure 1
Particle size, zeta potential, and TEM image of curcumin-niosome.


### 3.2.In Vitro Drug Release Profile

Thein vitro release profile of curcumin was investigated via dialysis. Thein vitro release behavior of curcumin-niosomes is shown in Figure 2. The release of curcumin from niosomes exhibited a biphasic pattern of constant sustained release after the initial burst. The burst release rate reached 45% within 6 hours of treatment and decreased thereafter. After 24 h, the accumulated release of curcumin from niosomes reached 80%, suggesting that niosomes provide excellent release from the carriers.Figure 2
Drug release profile of curcumin-niosome in 24 h.


### 3.3. Cellular Uptake

The uptake of free curcumin and curcumin-niosomes was investigated using flow cytometry. Figure3 shows the mean fluorescence intensity of A2780 cells treated with either free curcumin or curcumin-niosomes (12.5 μM) at different incubation times (1, 2, and 4 h). After 1 h of incubation, there is no distinction of cellular uptake between the free curcumin group and curcumin-niosomes group. However, extended incubation periods for 2 and 4 h showed significant increases of curcumin uptake compared to that of freely dispersed curcumin by A2780 cells. The intracellular levels of curcumin for the curcumin-niosomes group were 1.40-fold and 1.43-fold higher than those of the free curcumin group at 2 h and 4 h, respectively.Figure 3
Quantification of cellular uptake of curcumin and curcumin-niosomes,p
∗
∗
<
0.01.


### 3.4.In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Curcumin-Niosome

The cytotoxicity of curcumin-niosomes in the human ovarian cancer A2780 cell line after 24 h of incubation was assessed with MTT assay. Compared with free curcumin, curcumin-niosomes exhibited significantly higher cell killing rates at all of the tested concentrations (Figure4). Approximately 50% of cells survived after treatment with 12.5 μM of curcumin-niosomes for 24 h, whereas more than 90% of cells were alive after incubation with free curcumin for 24 h. The cytotoxicity of curcumin-niosomes was more potent (killed > 80% cells) when higher concentration of curcumin was used (25 μM), while free curcumin killed only 20% of the cells. Compared to free curcumin, curcumin-niosomes exhibited remarkable cytotoxicity, which is likely due to improved aqueous curcumin solubility and enhanced cellular uptake.Figure 4
Cytotoxicity of curcumin-niosomes,p
∗
<
0.05, p
∗
∗
<
0.01.


### 3.5. Cell Cycle Arrest

The growth inhibition mechanisms of curcumin-niosome in ovarian cancer A2780 cells were investigated using cell cycle analyses. Analyses were performed on A2780 cells after 24 h of drug incubation using flow cytometry (Figure5). The blank niosomes and control group displayed similar cell cycle distribution, while curcumin-niosomes increased the fraction of cells in S phase. The enhanced effect was observed to be 43.74% in the cells treated with 12.5 μM of curcumin-niosomes and was 55.72% in the cells treated with equivalent concentration of free curcumin (Figure 5). This suggests curcumin-niosomes significantly arrest the cell cycle of ovarian cancer cells at S phase.Figure 5
Cell cycle arrest induced by curcumin-niosomes.


### 3.6. Proapoptotic Effects

Induction of apoptosis is an effective strategy used in cancer chemotherapy. It was previously reported that curcumin was capable of inducing apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells [2]. In order to investigate the proapoptotic effect of curcumin-niosomes, the curcurmin-niosomes induced apoptosis was characterized by Annexin V/PI dual staining. For early apoptotic cells, phosphatidylserine (PS) turns from the inner side of the cell membrane to the outer leaflet, which is an important indication of early apoptosis [28]. Since Annexin V has a high affinity to PS, early apoptotic cells can therefore be detected by Annexin V staining [29]. As shown in Figure 6, the apoptotic rate of A2780 cells after 24 h treatment was 2.5% and 4.65% in the control and blank niosome group, respectively, while free curcumin (12.5 μM) induced A2780 cell apoptosis at a ratio of 12.85% and the curcumin-niosomes (12.5 μM) induced an apoptotic ratio of 42.7%. These results indicate that the curcumin-niosomes induced apoptosis more effectively than the freely dispersed curcumin.Figure 6
Apoptotic effects induced by curcumin-niosomes (p
∗
∗
<
0.01).


## 3.1. Characterization of Curcumin-Niosome

The curcumin-niosomes were successfully prepared. TEM image showed that curcumin-niosomes had homogeneous spherical shapes and smooth surfaces without aggregation (Figure1). The diameters of the blank niosomes and the curcumin-niosomes decreased as the pressure of the applied homogenization increased. Interestingly, the diameter and zeta potential of the curcumin-niosomes were smaller than those of the blank niosomes under the same pressure of homogenization (Figure 1). Two reasons may be responsible for this phenomenon. First, curcumin is believed to bind with the lipophilic segments of surfactant, resulting in a more compact curcumin-niosome structure and particle size. This may be due to a favorable lipid-soluble associative region provided by the surfactants. Second, the potential of blank niosomes fluctuated around 30 mV, which was related to the high-strength friction during the process of pressure homogenization. However, when curcumin was loaded, the potential value of the particles was slightly decreased, which may be due to the free curcumin distributed in the water phase or potential diffusion layer. The DLS analysis revealed that the mean diameter of curcumin-niosomes was 84.15
±
4.03 nm at the homogenization pressure of 800 bar with the drug EE% of 92.3%, indicating the successful loading of curcumin into niosomes. The size of the niosomes is appropriate for tumor specific accumulation via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect [27]. Additionally, after niosome storage at 4°C for over 3 months, there was less than 20 nm size increase, suggesting that curcumin-niosomes were stable over storage.Figure 1
Particle size, zeta potential, and TEM image of curcumin-niosome.


## 3.2.In Vitro Drug Release Profile

Thein vitro release profile of curcumin was investigated via dialysis. Thein vitro release behavior of curcumin-niosomes is shown in Figure 2. The release of curcumin from niosomes exhibited a biphasic pattern of constant sustained release after the initial burst. The burst release rate reached 45% within 6 hours of treatment and decreased thereafter. After 24 h, the accumulated release of curcumin from niosomes reached 80%, suggesting that niosomes provide excellent release from the carriers.Figure 2
Drug release profile of curcumin-niosome in 24 h.


## 3.3. Cellular Uptake

The uptake of free curcumin and curcumin-niosomes was investigated using flow cytometry. Figure3 shows the mean fluorescence intensity of A2780 cells treated with either free curcumin or curcumin-niosomes (12.5 μM) at different incubation times (1, 2, and 4 h). After 1 h of incubation, there is no distinction of cellular uptake between the free curcumin group and curcumin-niosomes group. However, extended incubation periods for 2 and 4 h showed significant increases of curcumin uptake compared to that of freely dispersed curcumin by A2780 cells. The intracellular levels of curcumin for the curcumin-niosomes group were 1.40-fold and 1.43-fold higher than those of the free curcumin group at 2 h and 4 h, respectively.Figure 3
Quantification of cellular uptake of curcumin and curcumin-niosomes,p
∗
∗
<
0.01.


## 3.4.In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Curcumin-Niosome

The cytotoxicity of curcumin-niosomes in the human ovarian cancer A2780 cell line after 24 h of incubation was assessed with MTT assay. Compared with free curcumin, curcumin-niosomes exhibited significantly higher cell killing rates at all of the tested concentrations (Figure4). Approximately 50% of cells survived after treatment with 12.5 μM of curcumin-niosomes for 24 h, whereas more than 90% of cells were alive after incubation with free curcumin for 24 h. The cytotoxicity of curcumin-niosomes was more potent (killed > 80% cells) when higher concentration of curcumin was used (25 μM), while free curcumin killed only 20% of the cells. Compared to free curcumin, curcumin-niosomes exhibited remarkable cytotoxicity, which is likely due to improved aqueous curcumin solubility and enhanced cellular uptake.Figure 4
Cytotoxicity of curcumin-niosomes,p
∗
<
0.05, p
∗
∗
<
0.01.


## 3.5. Cell Cycle Arrest

The growth inhibition mechanisms of curcumin-niosome in ovarian cancer A2780 cells were investigated using cell cycle analyses. Analyses were performed on A2780 cells after 24 h of drug incubation using flow cytometry (Figure5). The blank niosomes and control group displayed similar cell cycle distribution, while curcumin-niosomes increased the fraction of cells in S phase. The enhanced effect was observed to be 43.74% in the cells treated with 12.5 μM of curcumin-niosomes and was 55.72% in the cells treated with equivalent concentration of free curcumin (Figure 5). This suggests curcumin-niosomes significantly arrest the cell cycle of ovarian cancer cells at S phase.Figure 5
Cell cycle arrest induced by curcumin-niosomes.


## 3.6. Proapoptotic Effects

Induction of apoptosis is an effective strategy used in cancer chemotherapy. It was previously reported that curcumin was capable of inducing apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells [2]. In order to investigate the proapoptotic effect of curcumin-niosomes, the curcurmin-niosomes induced apoptosis was characterized by Annexin V/PI dual staining. For early apoptotic cells, phosphatidylserine (PS) turns from the inner side of the cell membrane to the outer leaflet, which is an important indication of early apoptosis [28]. Since Annexin V has a high affinity to PS, early apoptotic cells can therefore be detected by Annexin V staining [29]. As shown in Figure 6, the apoptotic rate of A2780 cells after 24 h treatment was 2.5% and 4.65% in the control and blank niosome group, respectively, while free curcumin (12.5 μM) induced A2780 cell apoptosis at a ratio of 12.85% and the curcumin-niosomes (12.5 μM) induced an apoptotic ratio of 42.7%. These results indicate that the curcumin-niosomes induced apoptosis more effectively than the freely dispersed curcumin.Figure 6
Apoptotic effects induced by curcumin-niosomes (p
∗
∗
<
0.01).


## 4. Discussion

Ovarian cancer is one of the leading causes of death in gynecological malignancies. Yet, the successful treatment of this cancer remains elusive accounting for several impediments including a lack in early diagnosis due to a symptomless early state, a high incidence of recurrence, and chemoresistance [30, 31]. The development of effective therapeutic agents for ovarian cancer therapy remains a key goal of current cancer therapy research. Curcumin has garnered increased interest due to its multiple bioactive effects including antiapoptosis, anti-inflammation, antiangiogenesis, and chemosensitivity. However, the poor aqueous solubility and rapid metabolism of curcumin have greatly impeded its clinical usage [1, 6]. Moreover, curcumin suffers from self-degradation even in the dark at physiological pH, while it is also photodegradable due to its light sensitivity in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) [32]. To this end, various particles, such as biocompatible and biodegradable liposomes, have been used to improve the stability of curcumin and ferry curcumin to cancer cells. Karewicz et al. prepared curcumin-loaded liposomes consisting of dihexyl phosphate (DPH), egg yolk phosphatidylcholine (EYPC), and cholesterol by the film evaporation technique, allowing curcumin to be soluble in the lipophilic bilayer owing to its lipophilicity. EYPC/DPH/cholesterol liposomal bilayer enabled improving the stability of curcumin and served as a favorable carrier for curcumin [33].Niosomes are nonionic surfactant vesicles composed of nonionic surfactants such as Span 80, Span 60, Span 40, and Span 20, Tween 80, Pluronic 188, cholesterol, and Cremophor RH40. Niosomes have a similar bilayer structure as liposomes but are more cost-effective and have better chemical and storage capabilities owing to the easy derivatization and versatile vesicular structure of surfactants. Taking advantage of niosomes, pH-sensitive niosomal formulations composed of PEG-poly(monomethyl itaconate)-CholC6 and cholesteryl hemisuccinate were reported to be prepared by an ethanol injection method and were evidenced to improve thein vitro effect and to reduce the side effects of the loaded drug [34].Considering the merits of niosome overwhelming liposome, we constructed a niosome-based system for curcumin delivery to improve its cytotoxic efficacy. In the present study, a novel niosome system composed of the nonionic surfactants, Span 80, Tween 80, and Poloxamer 188, has been developed. Curcumin was encapsulated in these niosomes with a high entrapment efficiency of92.3
±
0.4%, twice the reported curcumin-loaded Lipo-PEG-PEI complex (45%) [35]. The DLS analysis revealed that the mean diameter of curcumin-niosomes was 84.15
±
4.03 nm at the homogenization pressure of 800 bar and exhibited superior size compared to other curcumin-loaded liposomes (157 nm for curcumin-loaded silica-coated flexible liposomes, 132 nm for curcumin-loaded liposomes coupled with ApoE peptide, and 207 nm for curcumin-conjugated nanoliposomes) [36–38]. Curcumin-niosomes with considerable size (84.15 nm) were expected to accumulate in tumor tissues via enhanced permeability and retention. Interestingly, the particle size of curcumin-niosomes was found to be slightly smaller than its blank niosomes counterpart, which was attributed to the excellent binding between curcumin’s lipophilic chemical structures to the lipophilic segments of surfactant. Moreover, the accumulated release of curcumin from niosomes reached 80% after 24 h, suggesting that niosomes provide excellent release from the carriers.The blank niosomes did not induce cytotoxicity on cells, suggesting the niosomes had high biocompatibility and were suitable for drug delivery system. Curcumin-niosomes demonstrated enhanced cytotoxicity and proapoptotic effects when compared to free curcumin treatment of the A2780 cancer cell line, indicating that niosomes promoted cellular uptake and the protection of the bioactive, but biochemically unstable chemical, curcumin. This was evidenced by increased intracellular levels of curcumin (1.43-fold) through niosomes-mediated delivery compared to that of freely dispersed curcumin after 4 h incubation. Cell cycle analyses were also performed after 24 h treatment to investigate the growth inhibition mechanism of curcumin-niosomes. The analyses demonstrated significant cell cycle arrest at S phase of ovarian cancer cells treated with curcumin-niosomes, further confirming the enhanced apoptotic effects of curcumin-niosomes. These results demonstrate that niosomes represent a promising drug delivery system for curcumin in cancer therapy. In addition, niosomes can be further functionalized to specifically target tumor sites and prolong circulation in the body. Thein vivo antitumor effects of curcumin-niosomes are still under investigation and will be the subject in subsequent studies.


## 5. Conclusions

In this study, a novel curcumin-loaded niosomes system was developed to effectively deliver curcumin for the treatment of ovarian cancer. It was demonstrated that niosomes provided a biochemically stable protection and high entrapment efficiency of curcumin. Moreover, curcumin-niosomes exhibited enhanced cellular uptake, cytotoxic activity, cell cycle arrest, and apoptotic rate against ovarian cancer A2780 cells. Taken together, curcumin-niosomes are potential delivery formulations for the treatment of ovarian cancer.



---

*Source: 6365295-2016-07-21.xml*