# GRIN2B Gene and Associated Brain Cortical White Matter Changes in Bipolar Disorder: A Preliminary Combined Platform Investigation

Authors: Carissa Nadia Kuswanto; Min Yi Sum; Christopher Ren Zhi Thng; Yi Bin Zhang; Guo Liang Yang; Wieslaw Lucjan Nowinski; Yih Yian Sitoh; Chian Ming Low; Kang Sim
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

Abnormalities in glutamate signaling and glutamate toxicity are thought to be important in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder (BD). Whilst previous studies have found brain white matter changes in BD, there is paucity of data about how glutamatergic genes affect brain white matter integrity in BD. Based on extant neuroimaging data, we hypothesized that GRIN2B risk allele is associated with reductions of brain white matter integrity in the frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital regions and cingulate gyrus in BD. Fourteen patients with BD and 22 healthy controls matched in terms of age, gender and handedness were genotyped using blood samples and underwent diffusion tensor imaging. Compared to G allele, brain FA values were significantly lower in BD patients with risk T allele in left frontal region (P=0.001), right frontal region (P=0.002), left parietal region (P=0.001), left occipital region (P=0.001), right occipital region (P<0.001), and left cingulate gyrus (P=0.001). Further elucidation of the interactions between different glutamate genes and their relationships with such structural, functional brain substrates will enhance our understanding of the link between dysregulated glutamatergic neurotransmission and neuroimaging endophenotypes in BD.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Glutamate (Glu) is an excitatory neurotransmitter that is involved in important neural processes such as synaptic plasticity, neuronal development, and toxicity [1, 2]. Several studies have suggested that the abnormalities in glutamatergic function and signaling pathways through the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are involved in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder (BD), a debilitating psychiatric illness characterized by alternating and often recurring episodes of mania or hypomania and depression [1, 3–6]. It was previously thought that mood stabilisers such as lithium and valproate exert their neuroprotective effects through reducing NMDA receptor-induced excitotoxicity [4–6]. Within the glutamatergic receptor, the NR2B subunit is a critical structural and functional component of the NMDA receptor. Encoded by the GRIN2B gene, which is located at 12p12 and 419 kb in size, this subunit is expressed in the cortical and medial temporal parts of the brain, striatum, and olfactory bulb [7, 8]. Earlier studies have explored the relationship between GRIN2B gene and BD [9–12]. A genetic study of Italian patients with BD found linkage to marker D12S364 at locus 12p12 within the GRIN2B gene [9]. Another study of 440 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 64 candidate genes among Ashkenazi Jewish case-parent trios with bipolar I disorder noted the aforementioned association of GRIN2B with BD [10], and this was confirmed by a follow up study [11]. Genetic association studies have shown significant association between the 3′UTR region of GRIN2B and BD with psychotic symptoms [13] and number of hospitalization due to mania [14]. Recently, a positive association between GRIN2B gene and BD was also reported in Han Chinese patients with BD [12].Understanding the impact of specific glutamatergic pathways on brain substrates in BD are important for several reasons. First, it can determine particular brain regions associated with and affected by the glutamatergic genetic signals. Second, multiplatform approaches such as genetic-imaging paradigms can clarify and highlight pathophysiological mechanisms underlying BD [15]. Third, this can subsequently foster targeted multimodality investigations involving structural, functional, and chemical neuroimaging tools. Fourth, there is also suggestion that glutamatergic genes including GRIN2B are involved in oligodendrocyte survival through common stress related signaling pathways [16]. Furthermore, previous diffusion tensor imaging studies had implicated abnormalities in brain white matter regions including frontal, parietal brain regions and cingulum in BD [17].In the context of scant extant studies examining the impact of glutamatergic genetic signals on brain structural abnormalities in BD, we aimed to investigate the relationship of GRIN2B gene and brain white matter (WM) changes in patients with BD using diffusion tensor imaging. Based on extant neuroimaging data, we hypothesized that GRIN2B risk allele is associated with brain cortical white matter abnormalities involving reductions of white matter integrity in the frontal, parietal and temporal, and occipital regions and cingulate gyrus in BD.


## 2. Method

### 2.1. Participants

All subjects gave written informed consent to participate in the study after a detailed explanation of the study procedures. Fourteen patients suffering from BD were recruited from the Institute of Mental Health, Singapore. All diagnoses were made by a psychiatrist (K.S.) using information obtained from the existing medical records, clinical history, mental status examination, interviews with the patients, and their significant spouses or relatives as well as the administration of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV disorders-Patient Version (SCID-I/P) [18]. Participants with a history of significant neurological illness such as seizure disorder, head trauma, and cerebrovascular accidents were excluded. Furthermore, no subject met DSM-IV criteria for alcohol or other substance abuse in the preceding 3 months. The patients were maintained on a stable dose of antipsychotic medication for at least two weeks prior to the recruitment and did not have their medication withdrawn for the purpose of the study. Another twenty two age- and gender-matched healthy controls (HC) were screened using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV disorders—Nonpatient Version (SCID-I/NP)—[19] and deemed not to suffer from any Axis 1 psychiatric disorder and had no history of any major neurological, medical illnesses, substance abuse or psychotropic medication use. They were recruited from the staff population at the hospital as well as from the community by advertisements. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, as well as the National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore.


### 2.2. Genotyping Procedure

PCR was performed according to Ohtsuki et al. [20] with slight modifications. Isolated genomic DNA was amplified in 25 μL amplification mixture: 2 ng genomic DNA, 0.2 μM of each primer, 0.5 mM of dNTPs, 0.625 U GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega, USA), 5 μL GoTaq PCR buffer, and sterile milliQ water. The cycling conditions were initial denaturation at 95 degree celsius for 2 min followed by 40 cycles with a profile of 95 degree celsius for 1 min, 59 degree celsius for 1 min, 72 degree celsius for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 degree celsius for 5 min. Amplicons (rs890G/T) were separated by electrophoresis on 1.7% agarose gel, excised, purified (Qiagen Gel Extraction Kit) and sequenced.


### 2.3. Brain Imaging Acquisition

Brain imaging was performed using a 3-Tesla whole body scanner (Philips Achieva, Philips Medical System, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) with a SENSE head coil at the National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore. High-resolution T1-weighted Magnetization Prepared Rapid Gradient Recalled Echo (MPRAGE) was required (TR = 7.2 s; TE = 3.3 ms; flip angle = 8°). Each T1-weighted volume consisted of 180 axial slices of 0.9 mm thickness with no gap (field of view, 230 mm × 230 mm; acquisition matrix, 256 × 256 pixels). For DTI, single-shot echo-planar diffusion tensor images were obtained (TR = 3725 ms; TE = 56 ms; flip angle = 90°,b  = 800 s/mm²) with 15 different nonparallel directions (b  = 800 sec/mm2) and the baseline image without diffusion weighting (b  = 0 sec/mm2). The acquisition matrix was 112 × 109 pixels with a field of view of 230 mm × 230 mm, which was zero-filled to 256 × 256 pixels. A total of 42 axial slices of 3.0 mm thickness were acquired parallel to anterior-posterior commissure line. The T1-weighted and DTI data were sequentially acquired in a single session scan time without position change. Stability of a high signal to noise ratio was assured through a regular automated quality control procedure.


### 2.4. Image Processing

The structural MRI images were converted from the scanned images into the Analyze format, which were further processed using the Free Surfer software package (Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University,http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/). The software reformats each brain volume image into a volume image with 1 mm3 isovoxels, from which relevant brain structures can be delineated [21–26]. This automated method has been shown to be statistically indistinguishable from manual raters and reduces random errors, rater error, and intersubject variability typical of manual techniques [24]. Fractional Anisotropy (FA) maps were acquired from the DTI images from the software DTI Studio [27] and were then coregistered automatically to the MP-RAGE images using a mutual information cost function and a 12 parameter affine transformation. Eddy current correction was performed prior to registration. As the DTI images are co-registered to the subjects’ structural images, FA images were also automatically delineated for the separate brain structures using the same delineation parameters in the structural images and FA parameters of relevant brain structures were obtained.The test-retest (intrarater) reliability of the measurement technique of the cortical FAs were assessed by repeated measurement of eight randomly selected subjects (4 from controls and 4 from patients) over a minimum interval of 2 weeks. On the basis of a two-factor random effects model for intraclass correlation coefficient calculation, alpha values were all greater than 0.90 for the all the cortical FA indices. Inter-rater reliability evaluation performed on a separate subset of eight subjects (4 from controls and 4 from patients) revealed alpha values of greater than 0.90 for the cortical FA indices.


### 2.5. Statistical Analyses

Demographic variables between BD and HC were compared using two sample studentt-test and chi-square test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. For quality control, the samples were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE P≥0.05). The HWE P-value was obtained using the Haploview v4.2 [28], and the rests of the statistical analyses were performed using PASW 18. The genotype effect, diagnosis effect, and genotype-diagnosis interactions were further analyzed using the two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to control for covariates such as age, gender, education, handedness, and intracranial volume. Post hoc tests were performed for white matter regions with significant genotype-diagnosis interactions within HC and BD patient groups. The significance level for statistical tests was set at at two tailed P<0.005.


## 2.1. Participants

All subjects gave written informed consent to participate in the study after a detailed explanation of the study procedures. Fourteen patients suffering from BD were recruited from the Institute of Mental Health, Singapore. All diagnoses were made by a psychiatrist (K.S.) using information obtained from the existing medical records, clinical history, mental status examination, interviews with the patients, and their significant spouses or relatives as well as the administration of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV disorders-Patient Version (SCID-I/P) [18]. Participants with a history of significant neurological illness such as seizure disorder, head trauma, and cerebrovascular accidents were excluded. Furthermore, no subject met DSM-IV criteria for alcohol or other substance abuse in the preceding 3 months. The patients were maintained on a stable dose of antipsychotic medication for at least two weeks prior to the recruitment and did not have their medication withdrawn for the purpose of the study. Another twenty two age- and gender-matched healthy controls (HC) were screened using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV disorders—Nonpatient Version (SCID-I/NP)—[19] and deemed not to suffer from any Axis 1 psychiatric disorder and had no history of any major neurological, medical illnesses, substance abuse or psychotropic medication use. They were recruited from the staff population at the hospital as well as from the community by advertisements. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, as well as the National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore.


## 2.2. Genotyping Procedure

PCR was performed according to Ohtsuki et al. [20] with slight modifications. Isolated genomic DNA was amplified in 25 μL amplification mixture: 2 ng genomic DNA, 0.2 μM of each primer, 0.5 mM of dNTPs, 0.625 U GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega, USA), 5 μL GoTaq PCR buffer, and sterile milliQ water. The cycling conditions were initial denaturation at 95 degree celsius for 2 min followed by 40 cycles with a profile of 95 degree celsius for 1 min, 59 degree celsius for 1 min, 72 degree celsius for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 degree celsius for 5 min. Amplicons (rs890G/T) were separated by electrophoresis on 1.7% agarose gel, excised, purified (Qiagen Gel Extraction Kit) and sequenced.


## 2.3. Brain Imaging Acquisition

Brain imaging was performed using a 3-Tesla whole body scanner (Philips Achieva, Philips Medical System, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) with a SENSE head coil at the National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore. High-resolution T1-weighted Magnetization Prepared Rapid Gradient Recalled Echo (MPRAGE) was required (TR = 7.2 s; TE = 3.3 ms; flip angle = 8°). Each T1-weighted volume consisted of 180 axial slices of 0.9 mm thickness with no gap (field of view, 230 mm × 230 mm; acquisition matrix, 256 × 256 pixels). For DTI, single-shot echo-planar diffusion tensor images were obtained (TR = 3725 ms; TE = 56 ms; flip angle = 90°,b  = 800 s/mm²) with 15 different nonparallel directions (b  = 800 sec/mm2) and the baseline image without diffusion weighting (b  = 0 sec/mm2). The acquisition matrix was 112 × 109 pixels with a field of view of 230 mm × 230 mm, which was zero-filled to 256 × 256 pixels. A total of 42 axial slices of 3.0 mm thickness were acquired parallel to anterior-posterior commissure line. The T1-weighted and DTI data were sequentially acquired in a single session scan time without position change. Stability of a high signal to noise ratio was assured through a regular automated quality control procedure.


## 2.4. Image Processing

The structural MRI images were converted from the scanned images into the Analyze format, which were further processed using the Free Surfer software package (Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University,http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/). The software reformats each brain volume image into a volume image with 1 mm3 isovoxels, from which relevant brain structures can be delineated [21–26]. This automated method has been shown to be statistically indistinguishable from manual raters and reduces random errors, rater error, and intersubject variability typical of manual techniques [24]. Fractional Anisotropy (FA) maps were acquired from the DTI images from the software DTI Studio [27] and were then coregistered automatically to the MP-RAGE images using a mutual information cost function and a 12 parameter affine transformation. Eddy current correction was performed prior to registration. As the DTI images are co-registered to the subjects’ structural images, FA images were also automatically delineated for the separate brain structures using the same delineation parameters in the structural images and FA parameters of relevant brain structures were obtained.The test-retest (intrarater) reliability of the measurement technique of the cortical FAs were assessed by repeated measurement of eight randomly selected subjects (4 from controls and 4 from patients) over a minimum interval of 2 weeks. On the basis of a two-factor random effects model for intraclass correlation coefficient calculation, alpha values were all greater than 0.90 for the all the cortical FA indices. Inter-rater reliability evaluation performed on a separate subset of eight subjects (4 from controls and 4 from patients) revealed alpha values of greater than 0.90 for the cortical FA indices.


## 2.5. Statistical Analyses

Demographic variables between BD and HC were compared using two sample studentt-test and chi-square test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. For quality control, the samples were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE P≥0.05). The HWE P-value was obtained using the Haploview v4.2 [28], and the rests of the statistical analyses were performed using PASW 18. The genotype effect, diagnosis effect, and genotype-diagnosis interactions were further analyzed using the two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to control for covariates such as age, gender, education, handedness, and intracranial volume. Post hoc tests were performed for white matter regions with significant genotype-diagnosis interactions within HC and BD patient groups. The significance level for statistical tests was set at at two tailed P<0.005.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics

In the whole sample, there was no significant difference between BD and HC groups in age and gender. Significant difference between the groups was only found in years of education, whereby the BD group had less years of education compared to the HC group. In the BD group, the mean age of onset of the illness was 32.3 (SD 13.5) years. Overall, the mean duration of illness in BD patients was 4.07 years (SD 5.62) and the duration of untreated illness was 0.25 years (SD 0.34) (Table1).Table 1
Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants.
Characteristics
BD(n=14)
HC(n=22)
Test statistic
P
Agea, years
36.9 (12.2)
32.7 (12.3)
t
=
-
0.986
.331
Genderb
Males Females
10 (71.4)4 (28.6)
11 (50.0)11 (50.0)
χ
2
=
1.616
.204
Educationa, years
11.4 (2.3)
14.1 (2.3)
t
=
0.662
<0.05
Age at onseta, years
32.3 (13.5)
—
—
—
Duration of psychiatric illnessa, years
4.07 (5.62)
—
—
—
Duration of untreated illnessa, years
0.25 (0.34)
—
—
—
Medication
Lithium Valproate
77
—
—
—
aMean (S.D.).
bMean (%).
BD: patients with bipolar disorder; HC: healthy controls.


### 3.2. The Effect of GRIN2B Gene on White Matter Integrity in Bipolar Disorder

Overall, the T allele frequency for the GRIN2B risk variant amongst patients in the present study was 85.7%. The genotype frequencies of the GRIN2B risk variant are shown in Table2. There were significant effects of diagnosis by genotype effect interactions observed in the bilateral frontal region (left: F1,32=25.5, P<0.001; right: F1,32=18.7, P<0.001), left parietal region (F1,32=15.8, P<0.001), bilateral occipital region (left: F1,32=10.8, P=0.002; right: F1,32=28.1, P<0.001), and left cingulate gyrus (left: F1,32=18.6, P<0.001). These interactions remained significant after controlling for covariates (left frontal region: adjusted F1,30=22.4, P<0.001; right frontal region: adjusted F1,30=17.4, P<0.001; left parietal lobe: adjusted F1,30=13.0, P=0.001; left occipital region: adjusted F1,30=8.93, P=0.006; right occipital region: adjusted F1,30=24.8, P<0.001; left cingulate gyrus: adjusted F1,30=20.9, P<0.001). (Table 3).Table 2
Genotype frequencies of GRIN2B risk variant rs890G/T in our sample.
Locus
SNP
Chromosome position
Genotype frequency (%)
HWEP
BD (n=14)
HC (n=22)
GG
GT
TT
GG
GT
TT
GRIN2B
rs890
13715308
1 (7.1)
2 (14.3)
11 (78.6)
3 (13.6)
5 (22.7)
14 (63.6)
0.05
BD: patients with bipolar disorder; HC: healthy controls; HWEP: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium P value.Table 3
The effects of GRIN2B of rs890G/T on brain white matter regions (mean fractional anisotropy).
HC (n=22)
BD (n=14)
ANOVA  (unadjusted)
ANCOVAa  (adjusted)
GG(n=3)
T carriers(n=19)
GG(n=1)
T carriers(n=13)
Diagnosiseffect
Genotypeeffect
Interactionseffect
Diagnosiseffect
Genotypeeffect
Interactionseffect
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
F
P
F
P
F
P
F
P
F
P
F
P
Left occipital lobe
0.150
0.027
0.137
0.016
0.207
—
0.131
0.012
6.99
.013
21.4
<.001
10.8
.002
7.06
.012
16.2
<.001
8.93
.006
Right occipital lobe
0.147
0.031
0.149
0.016
0.254
—
0.145
0.016
24.9
<.001
26.4
<.001
28.1
<.001
25.4
<.001
20.7
<.001
24.8
<.001
Left parietal lobe
0.177
0.005
0.174
0.014
0.248
—
0.172
0.018
13.7
.001
18.2
<.001
15.8
<.001
13.7
.001
14.2
.001
13.0
.001
Right parietal lobe
0.177
0.020
0.174
0.153
0.218
—
0.175
0.021
3.78
.061
4.34
.045
3.41
.074
3.58
.068
2.53
.122
2.68
.112
Left temporal lobe
0.164
0.004
0.163
0.009
0.163
—
0.161
0.008
0.09
.764
0.11
.743
0.01
.934
0.08
.783
0.13
.719
0.00
.956
Right temporal lobe
0.157
0.005
0.160
0.012
0.156
—
0.155
0.009
0.17
.685
0.05
.832
0.09
.771
0.17
.686
0.02
.898
0.17
.682
Left frontal lobe
0.173
0.020
0.177
0.014
0.249
—
0.159
0.016
9.96
.003
21.4
<.001
25.5
<.001
9.62
.004
19.0
<.001
22.4
<.001
Right frontal lobe
0.174
0.029
0.171
0.014
0.249
—
0.161
0.017
10.9
.002
21.6
<.001
18.7
<.001
10.8
.003
20.9
<.001
17.4
<.001
Left cingulate gyrus
0.217
0.021
0.217
0.014
0.280
—
0.208
0.012
10.9
.002
18.6
<.001
18.6
<.001
12.6
.001
24.2
<.001
20.9
<.001
Right cingulate gyrus
0.200
0.017
0.196
0.017
0.250
—
0.193
0.017
5.06
.032
8.82
.006
6.47
.016
6.86
.014
13.6
.001
7.16
.012
aAdjusted for age, gender, education, handedness, and intracranial volume.
BD: patients with bipolar disorder; HC: healthy controls.As the diagnosis-genotype interactions were found to be significant for bilateral frontal, bilateral occipital, left parietal regions and left cingulate gyrus, we analyzed the genotype effects on these brain regions within patient and control groups (Figure1). There was no significant difference within the HC group; however, brain FA values were significantly lower in BD patients with risk T genotypes compared to those with G/G genotype (left frontal region: F1,10=24.05, P=0.001; right frontal region: F1,10=17.85, P=0.002; left parietal region: F1,10=9.29, P=0.001; left occipital region: F1,10=22.19, P=0.001; right occipital region: F1,10=33.05; P<0.001; left cingulate gyrus: F1,10=21.50, P=0.001).Figure 1
The association between GRIN2B rs890G/T genotypes and the brain white matter regions (T-bar: SD; *P<0.005).


## 3.1. Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics

In the whole sample, there was no significant difference between BD and HC groups in age and gender. Significant difference between the groups was only found in years of education, whereby the BD group had less years of education compared to the HC group. In the BD group, the mean age of onset of the illness was 32.3 (SD 13.5) years. Overall, the mean duration of illness in BD patients was 4.07 years (SD 5.62) and the duration of untreated illness was 0.25 years (SD 0.34) (Table1).Table 1
Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants.
Characteristics
BD(n=14)
HC(n=22)
Test statistic
P
Agea, years
36.9 (12.2)
32.7 (12.3)
t
=
-
0.986
.331
Genderb
Males Females
10 (71.4)4 (28.6)
11 (50.0)11 (50.0)
χ
2
=
1.616
.204
Educationa, years
11.4 (2.3)
14.1 (2.3)
t
=
0.662
<0.05
Age at onseta, years
32.3 (13.5)
—
—
—
Duration of psychiatric illnessa, years
4.07 (5.62)
—
—
—
Duration of untreated illnessa, years
0.25 (0.34)
—
—
—
Medication
Lithium Valproate
77
—
—
—
aMean (S.D.).
bMean (%).
BD: patients with bipolar disorder; HC: healthy controls.


## 3.2. The Effect of GRIN2B Gene on White Matter Integrity in Bipolar Disorder

Overall, the T allele frequency for the GRIN2B risk variant amongst patients in the present study was 85.7%. The genotype frequencies of the GRIN2B risk variant are shown in Table2. There were significant effects of diagnosis by genotype effect interactions observed in the bilateral frontal region (left: F1,32=25.5, P<0.001; right: F1,32=18.7, P<0.001), left parietal region (F1,32=15.8, P<0.001), bilateral occipital region (left: F1,32=10.8, P=0.002; right: F1,32=28.1, P<0.001), and left cingulate gyrus (left: F1,32=18.6, P<0.001). These interactions remained significant after controlling for covariates (left frontal region: adjusted F1,30=22.4, P<0.001; right frontal region: adjusted F1,30=17.4, P<0.001; left parietal lobe: adjusted F1,30=13.0, P=0.001; left occipital region: adjusted F1,30=8.93, P=0.006; right occipital region: adjusted F1,30=24.8, P<0.001; left cingulate gyrus: adjusted F1,30=20.9, P<0.001). (Table 3).Table 2
Genotype frequencies of GRIN2B risk variant rs890G/T in our sample.
Locus
SNP
Chromosome position
Genotype frequency (%)
HWEP
BD (n=14)
HC (n=22)
GG
GT
TT
GG
GT
TT
GRIN2B
rs890
13715308
1 (7.1)
2 (14.3)
11 (78.6)
3 (13.6)
5 (22.7)
14 (63.6)
0.05
BD: patients with bipolar disorder; HC: healthy controls; HWEP: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium P value.Table 3
The effects of GRIN2B of rs890G/T on brain white matter regions (mean fractional anisotropy).
HC (n=22)
BD (n=14)
ANOVA  (unadjusted)
ANCOVAa  (adjusted)
GG(n=3)
T carriers(n=19)
GG(n=1)
T carriers(n=13)
Diagnosiseffect
Genotypeeffect
Interactionseffect
Diagnosiseffect
Genotypeeffect
Interactionseffect
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
F
P
F
P
F
P
F
P
F
P
F
P
Left occipital lobe
0.150
0.027
0.137
0.016
0.207
—
0.131
0.012
6.99
.013
21.4
<.001
10.8
.002
7.06
.012
16.2
<.001
8.93
.006
Right occipital lobe
0.147
0.031
0.149
0.016
0.254
—
0.145
0.016
24.9
<.001
26.4
<.001
28.1
<.001
25.4
<.001
20.7
<.001
24.8
<.001
Left parietal lobe
0.177
0.005
0.174
0.014
0.248
—
0.172
0.018
13.7
.001
18.2
<.001
15.8
<.001
13.7
.001
14.2
.001
13.0
.001
Right parietal lobe
0.177
0.020
0.174
0.153
0.218
—
0.175
0.021
3.78
.061
4.34
.045
3.41
.074
3.58
.068
2.53
.122
2.68
.112
Left temporal lobe
0.164
0.004
0.163
0.009
0.163
—
0.161
0.008
0.09
.764
0.11
.743
0.01
.934
0.08
.783
0.13
.719
0.00
.956
Right temporal lobe
0.157
0.005
0.160
0.012
0.156
—
0.155
0.009
0.17
.685
0.05
.832
0.09
.771
0.17
.686
0.02
.898
0.17
.682
Left frontal lobe
0.173
0.020
0.177
0.014
0.249
—
0.159
0.016
9.96
.003
21.4
<.001
25.5
<.001
9.62
.004
19.0
<.001
22.4
<.001
Right frontal lobe
0.174
0.029
0.171
0.014
0.249
—
0.161
0.017
10.9
.002
21.6
<.001
18.7
<.001
10.8
.003
20.9
<.001
17.4
<.001
Left cingulate gyrus
0.217
0.021
0.217
0.014
0.280
—
0.208
0.012
10.9
.002
18.6
<.001
18.6
<.001
12.6
.001
24.2
<.001
20.9
<.001
Right cingulate gyrus
0.200
0.017
0.196
0.017
0.250
—
0.193
0.017
5.06
.032
8.82
.006
6.47
.016
6.86
.014
13.6
.001
7.16
.012
aAdjusted for age, gender, education, handedness, and intracranial volume.
BD: patients with bipolar disorder; HC: healthy controls.As the diagnosis-genotype interactions were found to be significant for bilateral frontal, bilateral occipital, left parietal regions and left cingulate gyrus, we analyzed the genotype effects on these brain regions within patient and control groups (Figure1). There was no significant difference within the HC group; however, brain FA values were significantly lower in BD patients with risk T genotypes compared to those with G/G genotype (left frontal region: F1,10=24.05, P=0.001; right frontal region: F1,10=17.85, P=0.002; left parietal region: F1,10=9.29, P=0.001; left occipital region: F1,10=22.19, P=0.001; right occipital region: F1,10=33.05; P<0.001; left cingulate gyrus: F1,10=21.50, P=0.001).Figure 1
The association between GRIN2B rs890G/T genotypes and the brain white matter regions (T-bar: SD; *P<0.005).


## 4. Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first DTI study investigating the interrelationship between the GRIN2B risk gene variant and brain white matter abnormalities in patients with BD. We found specific significant associations between GRIN2B rs890 risk allele and brain FA reductions involving bilateral frontal regions, left parietal region, bilateral occipital regions, and left cingulate gyrus within BD patients but not in healthy controls suggesting disorder specific genetic effect on brain white matter.Our findings are consistent with those from previous neuroimaging studies which found widespread brain white matter abnormalities in BD involving the cortical regions such as frontal, parietal, and occipital regions, as well as altered association and projection fibers although not in the context of imaging-genetic examination [17, 29–36]. A neurobiological model of affective disorders includes cortical and subcortical neural systems and can be divided into two neural networks [37]. The first is the ventral limbic network which comprises the amygdala, insula, orbitofrontal cortex, and the striatum and is responsible for identifying emotional valence of a stimulus and production of automatic affective states. The second is the dorsal cognitive network which includes the frontal cortices, anterior and posterior cingulate cortices, precuneus, and cuneus, which is involved in attention, executive and cognitive functioning [37–41]. Earlier data suggest that BD is associated with decreased activity in the dorsal network and hyperactivity in the ventral limbic network [37, 41], which can manifest as impaired performance on cognitive tasks, attention, and working memory deficits, dysregulation of mood, and abnormal emotional processing [39, 40]. Our current findings indicate GRIN2B risk allele associated reductions of white mater integrity in brain cortical regions within the dorsal network. Furthermore, the cingulate region has been hypothesized to facilitate the communication between the dorsal and the ventral systems and contribute to the regulation and integration of mood, cognitive, somatic, and autonomic responses [37]. The cingulate cortex has connections with the ventral network anatomy such as the limbic structures and facilitates top-down process of voluntary suppression/inhibition of an immediate response towards external stimuli [35, 42–45]. Disruption of white mater integrity in the cingulate gyrus may underlie increased biases towards negative and emotional stimuli or faces and diminished prefrontal modulation of affect exhibited in BD patients [37, 39].Our study found an association between GRIN2B risk allele and lower FA in the parietal and occipital regions in BD. This is consistent with earlier DTI findings, although limited, of white matter abnormalities in the parietal and occipital regions in BD [34, 36, 46] as well as functional neuroimaging studies which have suggested abnormalities in similar parietal and occipital regions in BD [42, 43, 47]. Malhi et al. [42] performed a functional MRI (fMRI) study involving 10 euthymic BD patients and 10 matched healthy controls with the subjects engaged in a modified word-based memory task designed to implicitly invoke negative, positive or neutral affect. Compared to healthy subjects, BD patients exhibited reduced activations in the left inferior parietal lobule, right posterior cingulate gyrus, bilateral anterior cingulate gyrus, thalamus, and other cortical regions when presented with words with negative affect. Likewise, when presented with words with positive affect, BD patients showed decreased activations in the bilateral frontal gyri, right anterior cingulate gyrus, left posterior cingulate gyrus, and bilateral occipital regions compared to healthy subjects. The same research group found that poor performance during a Theory of Mind (ToM) task by euthymic BD patients was associated with less cortical activations and higher activations in the anterior cingulate gyrus and bilateral occipital regions [43]. Furthermore, a structural MRI study noted reduced gray matter density in the right parietal lobule which was associated with higher interference during the Stroop color word task in remitted patients with bipolar disorder I [47].It was slightly surprising that no significant genotype-diagnosis interaction was noted in the temporal region despite the abundance of NR2B receptors in these regions. It is unclear how treatment with mood stabilisers such as valproate and lithium may have stabilized extant dysregulated glutamatergic neurotransmission in this region. For instance, chronic exposure to lithium was found to indirectly inhibit NMDA-receptor-mediated Ca2+ influx and decrease NR2B phosphorylation in temporal brain region [4–6]. Valproate induces neuroprotective proteins such as heat-shock protein (HSP70) by directly targeting histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition in the cortical including temporal and striatal brain regions [48].There are several limitations to the study. First, due to the small sample of subjects our findings need to be replicated with bigger sample size. Second, analyses of other brain structural measures including cortical thickness, subcortical structures, and specific white matter tracts will complement our understanding of the impact of GRIN2B on brain white matter integrity in BD. Third, we did not correlate the structural findings with neurocognitive data which would provide better insight into the cognitive impact of GRIN2B gene in BD.In conclusion, we found that GRIN2B was associated with reductions of brain white matter integrity within the fronto-parietal-occipital cortical regions in patients with BD. Further elucidation of the interactions between different glutamate genes and their relationships with these structural, functional, and chemical brain substrates will enhance our understanding of dysregulated glutamatergic neurotransmission and its relation to neuroimaging endophenotypes in BD. This has the potential to shed light on neurobiological mechanisms that underlie BD and provide targets for future intervention.



---

*Source: 635131-2013-12-30.xml*