# Numerical Study on the Thermal Enhancement of Phase Change Material with the Addition of Nanoparticles and Changing the Orientation of the Enclosure

Authors: P. Narasimha Siva Teja; S. K. Gugulothu; P. Dinesh Sankar Reddy; Abdul Ashraf; B. Deepanraj; P. Thillai Arasu
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

The global demand of the heating and cooling applications gives a larger potential to study the thermal energy storage system. Phase change materials (PCM) that are used to charge, store, and discharge the heat energy are inferior in heat transfer characteristics. The properties of PCM can be improved by adding nanoparticles, changing the orientation of the enclosure or both. Two-dimensional transient numerical analysis on the effect of Grashoff number (5000, 13000, and 20000), nanoparticle type (Al2O3, CuO, and MWCNT), and volume concentration (0%, 1%, 3%, and 5%) added in RT 42 PCM and orientation of square enclosure (30, 45, and 60°) to enhance the heat transfer rate is carried out. The thermophysical properties of the nano-PCM are evaluated and presented. From the results, it is affirmed that the melt fraction of the PCM rises with the increase in Gr and volume concentration of the nanoparticles up to an optimum level. The MWCNT-based nano-PCM attained a larger portion of melt fraction followed by Al2O3, CuO, and pure PCM. It is noted that an orientation of 60° and 45° will convert more quantities of pure PCM and nano-PCM into liquid fraction, respectively. The (3% MWCNT/RT-42 PCM) filled in 45° oriented container attained the highest melt fraction by 3.4%, 2.04%, and 2.94% than (3% Al2O3/RT-42 PCM), (1%CuO/RT-42 PCM), and pure PCM. The variation in the maximum melt fraction of the nanomaterial is because of the change in thermophysical characteristics of the nano-PCM.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Renewable energy resources are emerging in the present world to reduce global pollution and replace a portion of conventional fuels. Thermal energy having various industrial and domestic applications can be substituted with solar heat energy which is one of the prominent renewable energy sources. This energy is intermittent and depends on weather conditions. Therefore, storage of low-grade energy is inevitable to provide a sustainable solution to energy demand. Thermal energy storage can be done by using latent heat materials by changing their phase. Also, PCMs can be used in thermal management of different heat transfer applications like electronic cooling, waste heat recovery. Despite the larger heat capacities of phase change materials (PCM), it has a drawback of inferior heat transfer characteristics. Hence, improving the thermal characteristics of PCM is a challenging area in this field. Numerical assessment on thermal conductivity improvement of the PCM under uniform and sinusoidal types of heat flux by incorporating multiwalled carbon nanotubes was carried out by Gupta et al. [1]. An increase in melting rate was observed for higher values of amplitude and wavelength ratio of undulations applied on the vertical wall of the square duct. The charging process of the thermocline storage tank (TCST) was studied both experimentally and numerically by Xu et al. [2] by developing a 1D model. They introduced the correction coefficient (ɛ) expresses the enhancement in thermal diffusion. The use of the 1D model predicted the distribution of temperature more accurately and developed a correlation equation between the thickness of thermocline, Fr, and Re. They reported analytical expression between thermocline thickness and time is also obtained with approximately 14% of error. Experimental and computational investigations on the theory of constituent mixtures in the PCM composites were performed by Jiao et al. [3]. In this, the effect of nonequilibrium mixtures and the relation between velocity and change in density during melting were discussed. The temperature contours and streamlines are presented. The numerical and experimental results are compared for different positions and achieved a good agreement. Melting rate analysis of an encapsulated PCM incorporated with metal foam was done numerically by Baruah et al. [4]. The parameters varied in this study are porosity, pore size distribution, capsule size, and thickness of shell. They observed that the melting rate is improved for minimum capsule size and porosity with higher shell thickness. Computational study on the effect of encapsulated geometry filled with PCM for different angular orientations has been carried out by Zhang et al. [5]. They observed that the pyramidal and tetrahedral-shaped capsules with a horizontal base have the highest melting rate due to larger surface area. Comparing angular inclination, the melting rate is more when the center of gravity of capsules was nearer to the bottom of geometry. Huang et al. [6] inspected the rate of melting of double-PCM heat sinks by mixing paraffin with an alloy having lower melting point (LMPA). The performance characteristics are evaluated for different volume fractions of LMPA, the fin shape, and heating power. They reported that, throughout the second melting stage, the double-PCM heat sink and LMPA heat sink were similar in performance. However, during the third melting stage, the temperature control with paraffin gets deteriorated. The fin shape and volume fraction of the LMPA have been optimized by extending the second stage of melting and eliminating the third melting stage. Experimental assessment of the heat transmission enhancement of PCM-based heat energy storage system and its allied applications by incorporating metal fins and foams is performed by Guo et al. [7]. They affirmed that the combination of fin and foam structure reduces the melting time by 83% than bare, ideal fin, or metal foam structures. The uniformity of the temperature field is maintained with the help of foam structure only but not with the fin structure. Nie et al. [8] inspected the impact of geometry with seven different vertical-shell tubes on heat transmission characteristics in a latent thermal energy storage network. They reported that frustum-shaped geometry enhanced both conduction and convection, while the conical shell improved only convection compared to cylindrical geometry. Geometry modification has little effect on heat transfer in composite metal foam/PCM. The impact of thickness and position of the PCM film, different climatic conditions, PCM melting point temperature on the heat transfer analysis in the thermally efficient building are performed by Li et al. [9]. Results suggested proper melting point PCM reduces temperature fluctuations and energy expenditure of air conditioning units, and higher input temperature requires higher melting point PCM. Also, the PCM with melting point near to the occupant’s comfort zone increases the thermal comfort especially at moderate climate conditions. Huang et al. [10] evaluated the heat transmission improvement in the composite type PCM by incorporating porosity of metal foams having high conductivity. They noted that the rate of PCM melting is increased with foam porosity. Computational and experimental investigations on the impact of heat sink orientation attached to the PV cell passive cooling system are conducted by Abdulmunem et al. [11]. The heat sink is filled with PCM and studied with different inclinations of 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90°. They observed that the PCM melting speed has been enhanced alongside the advancement of orientation angle from 0 to 90°. The heat transmission analysis of the rectangular latent thermal energy storage network with different partitions (1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32) was performed experimentally (1 and 2 partitions) and numerically (for other partitions) by Mahdi et al. [12]. Partitioning of LHSU led to an increase in PCM melting speed, and a partition of 8 was found as the optimum. The amount of increase in melting rate is 31%, 53%, 65%, and 68% for 2, 4, 8, and 16 partitions compared to a single partition. Simulation study of integrated PCM partition and heat transmission fluid is conducted by Sodhi and Muthukumar [13]. The phase change materials selected in this analysis are in the range of 360°C to 305°C. The impact of Fin distribution, Stefan number on heat energy transmission was carried out. They noted that, for Steref≥1, the m-PCM system has the same or lesser charging or discharging rate than a single PCM system. However, there was an improvement up to 25% for Steref=0.5 to 2. Employing different fin-distribution and ratio of PCMs block length reduced the time for charging and discharging as high as 30% compared to a single PCM system. Performance analysis of different PCMs with higher and lower melting temperatures for PVT applications for weather conditions of Iraq in summer is published by Chaichan et al. [14]. The materials selected are paraffin wax, Vaseline-petroleum jelly, and its combination. The outcomes exhibited that the hybrid PCM using Vaseline completely mixed with paraffin wax is formed with a lower melting point. Usage of petroleum jelly, paraffin, and hybrid paraffin (50%wax+50%Vaseline) in the PVT structure caused a reduction in photovoltaic cell temperature, which led to huge improvements in efficiency of the system. Experimental investigation of a 2-phase closed thermosyphon (TPCT) form of heat pipes is done by Ozbas et al. [15]. The impact of the number of pipes at different positions (types 1, 2, and 3) and different angles of inclinations (26°, 41°, and 56°) on the effectiveness of TPCT is studied. They found that the best results are obtained for 26° and also affirmed that the greater the tilt angle the greater thermic resistance with lesser heat transferability of TPCT. Numerical analysis of melting and heat energy transmission of PCM in a rectangular block with bilateral flow has been done by Qin et al. [16]. The analysis was done by varying the values of Re number of heat transfer fluids ranging from 104 to 7×104 and Ra number in range of 3×106 to 6×106. They reported that the development of natural convection mode is owing to the effects of abnormal HTF heat transmission and cooling among the solid-liquid and the liquid PCM. Investigation on the effect of melting performance of paraffin RT82 PCM with distribution of copper-oxide-nanoparticles (CuO) at varying concentrations has been performed in multitube heat exchange units by Bashirpour-Bonab et al. [17]. The effect of nanoparticle mixture upon flow structure and heat transmission characteristic at different stages of melting of PCM was studied. They observed that with the increase of nanoparticles concentration between 3 and 7% leads to reduction in the time taken for melting by 8.7% to 22.18% though there is a minimal effect in the prime melting stages. It is also noted that the number of internal tubes has positive effects in melting rate and negative effects with distance between the tubes. Gollapudi et al. [18] numerically explored the impact of horizontal fin in a square container packed with Al2O3 nanofluid and found that heat transmission characteristics were upgraded with the presence of fin. Additionally, higher conductivity ratio of fins resulted in better heat transmission performance. De Césaro Oliveski et al. [19] investigated the melting method of lauric acid inside a rectangular shaped container with extended surface. The parametric study was performed for 78 different configurations by only changing the fin aspect ratio. They concluded that the total melting time reduced with decrease in aspect ratio of the fin. With increasing value of volume concentration (φ), there was an increase in rate of melt fraction. Furthermore, it is observed that there is a drop in energy accumulation as the value of φ rises. Abidi et al. [20] simulated the charging and discharging procedure of CaCl2.6H2O PCM containing graphene in 2D enclosed circular space. The enclosure contains two circles. The inner circle containing 12 blades of rectangular shape incorporated was kept at higher temperature for charging and lower temperature for discharging. The results show that increase in blade length caused a rise in enclosure temperature in charging mode and with a blade length of 1.5, and the Nu is enhanced by 252% in the first 100 s and decreased by a factor of 0.87 in 1000 s while charging whereas it is reduced by 94% and increased by 115% for discharging mode. Computational evaluation on thermal energy storage network employing fins with linear tree-like shapes with the integration of MoS2-TiO2 hybrid nanoparticles termed as hybrid nanoenhanced phase-changing material (HNEPCM) was done by Hosseinzadeh et al. [21]. It was found that the tree-shaped fins achieved superior heat transmission characteristics than rectangular fins and absence of fins. Evaluation of enhancement of melting characteristics of PCM by accommodating a new fin design is conducted by Kok [22]. Both types of fins are compared using base and nano-PCMs. They concluded that incorporating heat transfer fins improved the melting rate as well as reduced the cost and weight of thermal energy storage systems (TES). The designed fin reduced the melting time by 63% in the thermal energy storage tank. Design and analysis of a PCM-filled square cavity with thermal heat flux at distinct sites (0.2 L, 0.4 L, 0.6 L, and 0.8 L) were done by Dora et al. [23]. A heating element was positioned at the lowest surface with different locations varied in terms of length. The transient analysis was done for 10 hrs. They concluded that the heater at 0.2 L and 0.4 L assured the complete melting of the PCM than other locations. Experimental analysis was directed by Jevnikar and Siddiqui [24] to know the thermal behaviour of phase change material while melting. The temperature and velocity are measured using thermocouples and particle image velocimetry (PIV), respectively. They observed that velocity has a significant function in melting and heat transmission and provided the comprehensive data for heat energy transfer enhancement in numerical models with phase change process. Experimental and computational evaluations of the melting of the PCM 27 in an upright cavity were carried out by Mehdaoui et al. [25]. The simulation is carried out in TRANSYS with the Tunisian climate situations. They concluded that the room temperature with the incorporation of a PCM wall is reduced to 12°C, and the PCM has a calculated stored energy of 1200 kJ/m2 by increasing 2°C in the night times. Numerical and experimental examinations are performed by Ebadi et al. [26] to understand the effect of addition of Cu nanoparticles at different Rayleigh numbers on the melting of bio-PCM in a thermal energy storage of upright cylindrical type system. They observed that adding nanoparticles has minimal effect on the shapes of melt fraction and stored energy compared to base-PCM. Further, the stored energy difference with Rayleigh numbers was very less at the start of melting, and larger variance was detected at higher Rayleigh numbers. The effect of blending different types of nanoparticles (Silver, CuO, Al2O3, and MWCNT) with various volume fractions (1, 3, 6, 8, and 10%) into pure PCM was examined by Bashar and Siddiqui [27]. They affirmed that silver particles provide the highest heat transfer enhancement followed by CuO. The Al2O3 and MWCNT nanoparticles however reduce the heat transfer due to higher settlement rates, and the optimum addition of nanoparticles suggested is 6% for 25% higher rate of melting than pure PCM. Tao et al. [28] performed the numerical investigation on the impact of filling position and free convection on the rate of charge and discharge in latent heat storage system of shell and tube type. The analysis is carried out by packing the PCM in tube side in one case and shell side in another case with and without natural convection. They observed that the heat transfer is improved by 54.2% more when the PCM is used in tube side escorted by natural mode of convection with reduced melting time of 34.4% and 36.6% more with the PCM present in tube side without the free convection at a melting rate of 25.4% compared to the PCM in shell side. Joneidi et al. [29] investigated the impact of thermal heat flux and alignment of the enclosure on the heat transmission and melt fraction of PCM filled in a rectangular container. The rectangular cavity is heated with different heat fluxes (4.4 W, 5 W, and 5.6 W) oriented in different inclinations (0°, 45°, and 90°), and the analysis was carried with the help of thermocouples and camera. They concluded that the increase in heat flux led to reduction in the rate of melting of the PCM and an increase in inclination angle results in maximization of the final stored energy. The numerical analysis of a n-octadecane PCM filled in a container incorporated with silicone heating generating element was done by Bondareva and Sheremet [30]. The influence of Ra, St, and Ostrogradsky numbers on the speed of melting was analysed. They affirmed that the increase in all the three parameters have positive influence upon heat transmission enhancement and diminishes the time of melting. Arıcı et al. [31] investigated the impact of the volume concentration of the nanoparticles added in the PCM filled in a square cavity with varying wall temperatures. The analysis is performed with Paraffin wax, and Al2O3 is employed as nanoparticles in different proportions (1%, 3%, and 5%). The results explained that the increase in volume fraction after 1% has a lower effect after 20 min of time. The orientation of the heater plays a vital role after that time than the nanoparticle concentration. Enhancement of heat transfer using PCM material inside the annular region between two concentric circular, elliptical cylindrical with different orientations inside circular cylinder, and incorporation of fin inside cylinder was studied numerically by Rabienataj Darzi et al. [32]. The analysis is also carried out with the inclusion of Cu nanoparticles in the PCM. They reported higher melting rate at the upper part of the annular segment than the lower, and the usage of upright elliptical tube orientation reduces melting time. Also, blending Cu nanoparticles improves the heat transmission, and fins positioned on the higher and lower temperature walls enhance the melting rate. Evaluation of the heat transmission process in latent thermal energy storage units filled with nano-PCM is performed by Tasnim et al. [33]. The impact of dimensionless parameters is studied using scaled analysis for complete melting of PCM. They observed that heat transmission by both conductive and convective modes was degraded by addition of nanoparticles in PCM. Experimental analysis of the enhancement of the heat transmission in a PCM-filled enclosure using different inclination angles is carried out by Kamkari et al. [34]. The PCM used in this work is lauric acid with the Ra ranging from 3.6 to 8.3 E8, and the inclination angles of 0, 45, and 90° are performed. The photographs taken are image processed in order to differentiate the solid and liquid regions, and temperatures are recorded with the help of thermocouples. They noted that changing the orientation from vertical 90° to 0° will create the Benard which will affect the natural convection. Also, the rate of melting enhanced 35% and 53% for 45° and 0° compared to perpendicular orientation. The analysis of the melting rate of n-octadecane PCM using suspended CuO nanoparticles in a cavity with uniform thermal heat flux supplied to one of the edges was performed by Dhaidan et al. [35]. The influence of Ra, nanoparticle volume concentrations, and the subcooling was investigated. The PCM melting is dominated with the conduction represented as straight line shapes in the beginning, later as time marches it is shifted to natural convection curved shapes, they noted. Also, the heat transmission enhancement and rate of melting are improved upon optimum addition of nanoparticles and with increase in Ra. Bashirpour-Bonab et al. [36] numerically investigated the melting fraction of CuO-blended nano-PCM filled in a multitube heat exchanger. The impact of nanoparticle volume fraction, number of tubes, and spacing between the tubes on rate of melting is studied. They reported that the melting fraction is improved to 33.87% with 7% volume concentration and 4 number of tubes and 20.54% by increasing the distance between the tubes. The analysis of heat transfer characteristics of PCM filled in a combined fractal fin-based heat exchanger is carried out by Luo et al. [37]. The influence of combined fractal fins, fin’s area, spacing, and partition between the fins is studied. The time to liquify the PCM is reduced with the fractal fins by 68%. They concluded that the decrement of width takes a long time to raise the fin’s temperature and increase the heat transfer area results in reduction of thermal resistance. However, the mean liquid fraction of PCM does not continuously rise with the area of heat transfer. Zhang et al. performed the numerical study on the thermal management of the buildings using encapsulated PCM. They focused on the effect of geometry of the encapsulation on the melting behaviour of the PCM and validated the numerical outcomes with the experimental results. Also, the variation of shell orientation, size, and temperature difference is studied. They affirmed that the pyramidal-shaped shell attains the minimum time of melting and recommended the medium size capsule with low initial temperature differences. Experimental heat transfer analysis of composite PCM prepared with lauric and palmitic acid distributed in mesoporous graphite (MG) is conducted by Nirwan et al. [38]. The impact of variation of weight fraction is studied using differential scanning calorimeters. The weight fraction of 1 : 5 MG-PCM composite takes away the maximum heat by reducing the temperature of the heating source by 20°C. They recommended this ratio of the composite rather than the pure form of PCM for maximum heat transfer in electronic devices. Li et al. [39] worked on the microencapsulation of aluminium and zinc for high-temperature thermal energy storage applications. The preparation and characterization of microencapsulated PCMs are explained. They observed that the latent heat of MEPCMs after boehmite, thermal oxidation, and copper plating treatment reduced to 160.7 J/g, 126.4 J/g, and 89 J/g from 176 J/g of pure Al-Zn MEPCM. However, they noted the life of the MEPCM has improved after the copper plating treatment. The experimental investigation of microencapsulation of C10H20O2 (CA) and C6H32O2 (PA) eutectic mixture in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) is carried out by Xing et al. [40]. From the characterization of the encapsulated PCM, they found that the optimum ratio of shell and core is 1 : 2 with the liquefaction temperature of 17.1°C and pure solvent melting heat of 92.1 J/g. A 500 : 300 nm thickness microencapsulation of ZnO : Al2O3 composite material for medium temperature applications is prepared by Kawaguchi et al. [41]. It exhibits a melting temperature of 510°C with a pure solvent melting heat of 117 J/g and noted that 75% of encapsulations maintained the same spherical form after 100 cycles. Also, they sintered the MEPCM with glass frit and observed almost 100% of shape retainment after 100 cycles. Jevnikar and Siddiqui [42] performed the experimental and numerical flow and thermal analysis of PCM. The influence of heating location on the flow field and heat transfer of PCM is studied. They noted that the melting and thermal performance of PCM is influenced by the fluid flow regulated by natural convection. Numerical analysis of the effect of vertical aluminium fins on the heat transfer enhancement of PCM is carried out by Abdi et al. [43]. They affirmed that with the usage of five numbers of long fins, a 200% of power improvement, 6% of energy storage reduction, and 12% of depletion in PCM content are observed. Kamkari and Amlashi [44] numerically investigated the impact of orientation of the enclosure on the melting performance of PCM. A reduction of 52% and 37% of melting time is observed for 0° and 45° orientations. They also presented the correlations to predict the melting rate, energy stored, and Nu at any instant. The design of PCM container with double pipe helical coiled tube for thermal energy storage application is examined numerically by Mahdi et al. [45]. They concluded that the proposed design reduces the melting rate by 25% and 59% compared to parallel and perpendicular double pipe energy storage systems. Also, the pitch of the coil effects incredible phase change transformation; however, they selected the optimum pitch of outer diameter as 2. The design and optimization of a multilayer shell and tube unit incorporated with longitudinal and radial metal fins are carried out by Xu et al. [46]. The amount of melting time reduced is 56%, 65%, and 71% with the addition of fins than no fin condition. The maximum reduction in time is observed for radial type of fin, and this is selected as the best arrangement. The optimum configuration increases the comprehensive storage density evaluation to 36%.The detailed review of many researches apprises the various techniques involved in PCM-based thermal storage systems. However, only few discussed the combined effect of nanoparticle incorporation and angular orientation of the container. The main objective of this work is to study the effect of Grashof number (5000, 13000, and 20000), nanomaterial type (Al2O3, CuO, and MWCNT), volume concentration (0%, 1%, 3%, and 5%), and orientation angle (30, 45, and 60°) on the melting rate of the PCM in a square container. The analysis is carried out with RT42 PCM up to 1500 sec.


### 1.1. Problem Description and Methodology

A two-dimensional transient numerical analysis of the PCM filled in a square enclosure inclined in different orientations is performed. Figures1(a) and 1(b) show the geometry description of the enclosure studied.Figure 1
(a) Model geometry with horizontal and vertical sides. (b) Orientation of the enclosure.
(a)(b)In this work, a square enclosure with5mm×5mm is modelled in ANSYS design modeler. This cavity is embedded by phase change material (RT-42) and consolidated with different nanoparticles (Al2O3, CuO, and MWCNT) by varying concentration (1%, 3%, and 5%). The top and lower walls are kept adiabatic, the left side wall is subjected to higher temperature(Th), and the right side wall is subjected to room temperature (Tc) so that Th>Tc. Transient numerical study is carried out for the time steps of 500, 1000, and 1500 seconds. Also, the same analysis is executed by changing the orientation of the base side of the cavity with different inclinations (30, 45, and 60°) as shown in Figure 1(b). The governing equations for numerical computation are listed below from equations (1) to (3):Continuity equation:(1)∂ρ∂t+∇.ρU⟶=0.Momentum equation:(2)∂∂tρU⟶+∇.ρU⟶U⟶=−∇P+ρg⟶+∇.τ⟶+F⟶,whereρg⟶ and F⟶ are gravitational and external body forces, respectively. P is static pressure, and τ⟶ is a stress tensor.Energy equation:(3)∂ρH∂t+∇.ρU⟶H=∇.K∇T+S.Here,H, T, ρ, and K are enthalpy, temperature, density, and conductivity of nanoparticle enhanced-phase change material (NEPCM), respectively. U⟶ is velocity and S, and volumetric heat generation term is assumed zero in present analysis. The gross enthalpy of PCM H is aggregate of sensible heat (h) and latent heat (ΔH), respectively. Latent heat is expressed as
(4)ΔH=βL,whereLis the latent heat of PCM, and β is the liquid fraction given by the following equation,
(5)β=0ifT<Tsolidusβ=1ifT>Tsolidusand,β=T−TsolidusTLiquidus−TsolidusifTsolidus<T<Tliquidus.Now thermophysical properties of nano-PCM such as density, heat capacity, latent heat, and viscosity are calculated using the Arasu and Mujumdar [47], Ebrahimi and Dadvand [48], and Teja et al. [49] presented from equations (6) to (9), and the variation of these properties with volume concentration is shown in Figure 2.
(6)ρnpcm=φρnp+1−φρpcm,(7)cp,npcm=φρcpnp+1−φρcppcmρnpcm,(8)Lnpcm=1−φρLpcmρnpcm,(9)μnpcm=0.983e12.959φμpcm.Figure 2
Material properties of NEPCM for different concentrations of nanoparticles. (a) Effective density. (b) Effective specific heat. (c) Effective thermal conductivity.
(a)(b)(c)While the effective thermal conductivity is expressed as(10)Knpcm=Knp+2Kpcm−2Kpcm−KnpφKnp+2Kpcm+Kpcm−KnpφKpcm+5×104βkζφρpcmCp,pcmBTρnpdnpfT,φ,whereB is Boltzmann constant, and its value is 1.381×10−23J/K and,
(11)βk=8.4407100φ−1.07304,(12)fT,φ=2.8217×10−2φ+3.917×10−3TTref+−3.0669×10−2φ−3.91123×10−3.Here,Tref is assumed to be 303 K. The properties of NEPCM for different volume fractions (1%, 3%, and 5%) of nanoparticles (Al2O3, CuO, and MWCNT) are calculated using the equations (6) to (10). The thermophysical properties of the base materials are listed in Table 1. Also, the dimensionless Grashoff number and Nusselt number used are expressed as
(13)Gr=gβfTh−TcH3νf2,(14)Nu=hLK.Table 1
Thermophysical properties of the base materials used.
PropertiesPure PCM (RT-42)Alumina (Al2O3)Copper oxide (CuO)Multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT)Density (kg/m3)760360063101600Specific heat (KJ/kg.K)20007655318.039Thermal conductivity (W/m.K)0.236763000Viscosity (kg/m.s)0.02351———Thermal expansion coefficient (1/K)0.0005———Pure solvent melting heat (J/kg)165000———Solidus temperature (K)311.15———Liquidus temperature (K)315.15———The boundary conditions applied to the model in the study is mathematically given by:T=Th for X=0 and 0<Y<5 on left vertical wall.T=Tc for X=5 and 0<Y<5 on right vertical wall.dQ=0 for 0<X<5 and Y=0 on bottom horizontal wall.dQ=0 for 0<X<5 and Y=5 on top horizontal wall.


### 1.2. Numerical Procedure

In the present study, numerical analysis is carried out with ANSYS FLUENT software. The governing equations based on boundary conditions are numerically solved by fluent using FVM. Construction of geometry is done in a design modeler from the fluid flow (fluent) geometry component. Meshing of the model is done by taking an adaptive size function with a fine relevance center. The skewness for mesh is maintained minimum while the orthogonal quality is kept closer to 1 by incorporating quadrilateral mesh cells by setting quadrilaterals as the meshing method.Pressure-based solver along with its velocity coupling and adjustment equation is utilized with simple algorithms and PRESTO! Scheme, respectively. While the equations of momentum and energy are evaluated using an upwind scheme of second order. Transient analysis is performed by taking the time step size as 0.2 s, and the maximum number of iterations is fixed as 20 for every time step. The convergence limit for residuals is fixed as 10-3 for continuity, momentum equations, and it is 10-6 for an energy equation.


### 1.3. Grid Independence Study and Validation

To select the appropriate grid size, the numerical model is verified with different element sizes. The mesh consists of uniform quadrilaterals distribution throughout the enclosure. Five different mesh sizes were examined with the number of cells varying from61×61, 100×100, 143×143, 179×179, and 200×200, respectively, as shown in Table 2. As shown in Figure 3, the difference in the Nusselt numbers for 179×179 (32041 elements) and 200×200 (40000 elements) is very small. Hence, the number of cells in the mesh is selected as 32041 with element size as 0.028 mm for further study.Table 2
Number of elements vs. Nusselt number (Nu).
Grid sizeNusselt number (Nu)61×612.10952100×1002.10201143×1432.09754179×1792.09348200×2002.08958Figure 3
Grid independence study.The validation of the present work is conducted qualitatively by comparing the melt-fraction contours of the present study with Arasu and Mujumdar [47] study. Comparison is done for melting of PCM (Paraffin wax) with 2%, 5% Al2O3 addition and melting of PCM (RT-42) with 1%, 5% Al2O3 addition of present study. The contours of the melt fraction for both the current work and reference work are matching very nearer as shown in Figure 4.Figure 4
Comparison of the present work with reference work.


## 1.1. Problem Description and Methodology

A two-dimensional transient numerical analysis of the PCM filled in a square enclosure inclined in different orientations is performed. Figures1(a) and 1(b) show the geometry description of the enclosure studied.Figure 1
(a) Model geometry with horizontal and vertical sides. (b) Orientation of the enclosure.
(a)(b)In this work, a square enclosure with5mm×5mm is modelled in ANSYS design modeler. This cavity is embedded by phase change material (RT-42) and consolidated with different nanoparticles (Al2O3, CuO, and MWCNT) by varying concentration (1%, 3%, and 5%). The top and lower walls are kept adiabatic, the left side wall is subjected to higher temperature(Th), and the right side wall is subjected to room temperature (Tc) so that Th>Tc. Transient numerical study is carried out for the time steps of 500, 1000, and 1500 seconds. Also, the same analysis is executed by changing the orientation of the base side of the cavity with different inclinations (30, 45, and 60°) as shown in Figure 1(b). The governing equations for numerical computation are listed below from equations (1) to (3):Continuity equation:(1)∂ρ∂t+∇.ρU⟶=0.Momentum equation:(2)∂∂tρU⟶+∇.ρU⟶U⟶=−∇P+ρg⟶+∇.τ⟶+F⟶,whereρg⟶ and F⟶ are gravitational and external body forces, respectively. P is static pressure, and τ⟶ is a stress tensor.Energy equation:(3)∂ρH∂t+∇.ρU⟶H=∇.K∇T+S.Here,H, T, ρ, and K are enthalpy, temperature, density, and conductivity of nanoparticle enhanced-phase change material (NEPCM), respectively. U⟶ is velocity and S, and volumetric heat generation term is assumed zero in present analysis. The gross enthalpy of PCM H is aggregate of sensible heat (h) and latent heat (ΔH), respectively. Latent heat is expressed as
(4)ΔH=βL,whereLis the latent heat of PCM, and β is the liquid fraction given by the following equation,
(5)β=0ifT<Tsolidusβ=1ifT>Tsolidusand,β=T−TsolidusTLiquidus−TsolidusifTsolidus<T<Tliquidus.Now thermophysical properties of nano-PCM such as density, heat capacity, latent heat, and viscosity are calculated using the Arasu and Mujumdar [47], Ebrahimi and Dadvand [48], and Teja et al. [49] presented from equations (6) to (9), and the variation of these properties with volume concentration is shown in Figure 2.
(6)ρnpcm=φρnp+1−φρpcm,(7)cp,npcm=φρcpnp+1−φρcppcmρnpcm,(8)Lnpcm=1−φρLpcmρnpcm,(9)μnpcm=0.983e12.959φμpcm.Figure 2
Material properties of NEPCM for different concentrations of nanoparticles. (a) Effective density. (b) Effective specific heat. (c) Effective thermal conductivity.
(a)(b)(c)While the effective thermal conductivity is expressed as(10)Knpcm=Knp+2Kpcm−2Kpcm−KnpφKnp+2Kpcm+Kpcm−KnpφKpcm+5×104βkζφρpcmCp,pcmBTρnpdnpfT,φ,whereB is Boltzmann constant, and its value is 1.381×10−23J/K and,
(11)βk=8.4407100φ−1.07304,(12)fT,φ=2.8217×10−2φ+3.917×10−3TTref+−3.0669×10−2φ−3.91123×10−3.Here,Tref is assumed to be 303 K. The properties of NEPCM for different volume fractions (1%, 3%, and 5%) of nanoparticles (Al2O3, CuO, and MWCNT) are calculated using the equations (6) to (10). The thermophysical properties of the base materials are listed in Table 1. Also, the dimensionless Grashoff number and Nusselt number used are expressed as
(13)Gr=gβfTh−TcH3νf2,(14)Nu=hLK.Table 1
Thermophysical properties of the base materials used.
PropertiesPure PCM (RT-42)Alumina (Al2O3)Copper oxide (CuO)Multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT)Density (kg/m3)760360063101600Specific heat (KJ/kg.K)20007655318.039Thermal conductivity (W/m.K)0.236763000Viscosity (kg/m.s)0.02351———Thermal expansion coefficient (1/K)0.0005———Pure solvent melting heat (J/kg)165000———Solidus temperature (K)311.15———Liquidus temperature (K)315.15———The boundary conditions applied to the model in the study is mathematically given by:T=Th for X=0 and 0<Y<5 on left vertical wall.T=Tc for X=5 and 0<Y<5 on right vertical wall.dQ=0 for 0<X<5 and Y=0 on bottom horizontal wall.dQ=0 for 0<X<5 and Y=5 on top horizontal wall.


## 1.2. Numerical Procedure

In the present study, numerical analysis is carried out with ANSYS FLUENT software. The governing equations based on boundary conditions are numerically solved by fluent using FVM. Construction of geometry is done in a design modeler from the fluid flow (fluent) geometry component. Meshing of the model is done by taking an adaptive size function with a fine relevance center. The skewness for mesh is maintained minimum while the orthogonal quality is kept closer to 1 by incorporating quadrilateral mesh cells by setting quadrilaterals as the meshing method.Pressure-based solver along with its velocity coupling and adjustment equation is utilized with simple algorithms and PRESTO! Scheme, respectively. While the equations of momentum and energy are evaluated using an upwind scheme of second order. Transient analysis is performed by taking the time step size as 0.2 s, and the maximum number of iterations is fixed as 20 for every time step. The convergence limit for residuals is fixed as 10-3 for continuity, momentum equations, and it is 10-6 for an energy equation.


## 1.3. Grid Independence Study and Validation

To select the appropriate grid size, the numerical model is verified with different element sizes. The mesh consists of uniform quadrilaterals distribution throughout the enclosure. Five different mesh sizes were examined with the number of cells varying from61×61, 100×100, 143×143, 179×179, and 200×200, respectively, as shown in Table 2. As shown in Figure 3, the difference in the Nusselt numbers for 179×179 (32041 elements) and 200×200 (40000 elements) is very small. Hence, the number of cells in the mesh is selected as 32041 with element size as 0.028 mm for further study.Table 2
Number of elements vs. Nusselt number (Nu).
Grid sizeNusselt number (Nu)61×612.10952100×1002.10201143×1432.09754179×1792.09348200×2002.08958Figure 3
Grid independence study.The validation of the present work is conducted qualitatively by comparing the melt-fraction contours of the present study with Arasu and Mujumdar [47] study. Comparison is done for melting of PCM (Paraffin wax) with 2%, 5% Al2O3 addition and melting of PCM (RT-42) with 1%, 5% Al2O3 addition of present study. The contours of the melt fraction for both the current work and reference work are matching very nearer as shown in Figure 4.Figure 4
Comparison of the present work with reference work.


## 2. Results and Discussion

Computational thermal analysis of heat transfer and melting of pure PCM/nano-PCM (PCM+nanoparticles) is carried out for three different Grashoff numbers (5000, 13000, and 20000) given to left side wall with the bottom edge oriented in different inclinations (0°, 30°, 45°, and 60°). The effect of nanoparticle type (Al2O3, CuO, and MWCNT), concentration (1%, 3%, and 5%), Grashoff number, and inclination is presented.


### 2.1. Melting of Pure PCM

Figures5(a)–5(c) show the melt fraction contours of the PCM at three different Grashoff numbers up to 1500 sec with an interval of 500 sec. Red portion in the contour represents the liquefied part of the PCM with a melt fraction as 1.0, and the solid part is described as the blue portion with a melt fraction as 0.0. In between, the different colours of the contours represent the mushy region. It is observed that during the initial stages of melting, the liquid-fraction region is almost vertical as shown in Figure 5(a). This clearly shows that the initial mode of heat transfer was by conduction. After some time, the conduction dominant zone is converted into mixed conduction and convection zone by transforming the solid PCM into liquid. The density difference between the solid and liquid makes the material move by natural convection as shown in Figures 6(a)–6(c) for different Gr.Figure 5
Melt-fraction contours of PCM melting for (a)Gr=5000, (b) Gr=13000, and (c) Gr=20000.
(a)(b)(c)Figure 6
Velocity streamlines of pure PCM for Gr (a) 5000, (b) 13000, and (c) 20000.
(a)(b)(c)The movement of the liquid will form upward and downward rotations with small velocities due to the buoyancy forces formed by the temperature difference between hot and cold wall. Also, due to the boundary layer effect by viscosity, the velocity adjacent to the wall is zero, and it gradually increases away from the wall up to the solid portion of the PCM.With the increase in Gr, the rise in hot wall temperature is evident, and the availability of melted PCM will be more; therefore, more velocity has been observed. ForGr=20000, the highest velocity noted is 4.174e-4 m/s which is 51.23% and 32.97% higher than Gr=5000 and 13000 case.Figure7 depicts the effect of Gr on the temperature of the PCM with respect to time. It is noted that the temperature has been increased with Gr for a period of time; afterward, it comes to a steady state. It is also identified that the slope of the temperature lines are reducing with respect to Gr, indicating that the rate of attaining steady state is less with increase in Gr. The amount of heat transferred to the PCM is stored in the form of phase change. With the increase in temperature, the amount of melting rate also improved from 24.16% to 25.44%, 76% to 76.35%, and 86.4% to 86.417% for Gr=5000, 13000, and 20000, respectively. For the same time period, the melted region is more for Gr=20000.Figure 7
The effect of Gr on temperature of PCM with time.


### 2.2. Melting of PCM in an Enclosure with Angular Orientations

Transient thermal analysis of a square enclosure filled with the PCM, oriented in different angles (0°, 30°, 45°, and 60°), as shown in Figure1 is performed. Figure 8 shows the melt-fraction contours for different Gr (5000, 13000, and 20000) and varying time intervals (500 s, 1000 s, and 1500 s).Figure 8
Melt-fraction contours of pure PCM in a container oriented in (a) 0°, (b) 30°, (c) 45°, and (d) 60°.
(a)(b)(c)(d)Figure9 represents the graph plotted for the variation of melt-fraction of PCM with different orientations (0°, 30°, 45°, and 60°) for a time of 1500 seconds and Gr of 20,000. In the beginning, at around 50 seconds, the PCM in all the containers is in the same stage, the PCM is slowly melting into fluid up to 200 seconds, and later, the material in all the containers attains the steady state. It is observed that the amount of melt is more as the inclination angle increases. The percentage increase of melt fraction is less for different orientations and pure PCM. Using 60° orientation, the melt fraction improved is 2.43%, 0.5%, and 0.08% more than the 0°, 30°, and 45° inclinations.Figure 9
Effect of orientation on melt-fraction with time.


### 2.3. Effect of Nanoparticle Concentration in PCM

The computational analysis on the melting performance of phase change material blended with different nanoparticles (Al2O3/CuO/MWCNT) in various proportions (1%, 3%, and 5%) filled in a square enclosure is carried out. Figures 10(a)–10(c) show the comparison of the melt fraction of nano PCM (PCM+Al2O3/CuO/MWCNT) with different concentrations (1%, 3%, and 5%), respectively. It is clearly visible that the amount of melt fraction is not varied linearly with the volume concentration of the nanomaterial. In the first case with Al2O3, the maximum melt fraction is observed for PCM+3% followed by 1%, pure PCM (0%), and 5%. The melting performance is improved with addition of Al2O3 up to 3%; afterward, it is reduced. This is because of increased density and viscosity. Also, in the beginning of heating PCM, the transfer of energy is predominantly by conduction succeeded by convection. By adding more amounts of high conductive nanomaterials, the heat transfer will again convert into a conductive zone. Therefore, the melting performance reduces.Figure 10
Effect of nanoparticles (a) Al2O3, (b) CuO, and (c) MWCNT with different volume concentrations (1%, 3%, and 5%) on melt fraction at Gr=20000.
(a)(b)(c)With 3% Al2O3, the increase in fluid fraction is 2.9%, 1.38%, and 5.27% more than the melt fraction of 1%, pure PCM, and 5% added nanofluid, respectively. In the second case, in Figure 10(b), though the conductivity of the CuO is more than Al2O3, the enhancement of effective thermal conductivity is very less compared to effective density. Hence, 1% CuO nanomaterial addition has more amount of liquid fraction than 3 and 5% nanofluid. Figure 2 shows the variation of thermophysical properties of nanofluids for different nanoparticle concentration. With 1% CuO, increase in fluid fraction is 2%, 2.924%, and 11% higher than the melt fraction of 3%, pure PCM, and 5% added nano-PCM. With the incorporation of MWCNT nanoparticles (1%, 3%, and 5%) shown in Figure 10(c), the heat transfer is enhanced due to high effective conductivity of the nanofluid, and also the percentage of change in density is less compared to other two nanoparticles. Similar to Al2O3-based nano-PCM, the liquid fraction is more in 3% followed by 1% addition. However, the melt fraction is less in 5% MWCNT due to the effect of thermophysical properties. The increase in fluid fraction of nanofluid blended with 3% MWCNT is 5%, 1.46%, and 2.94% more than pure PCM, 1%, and 5% blended nano-PCM.


### 2.4. Effect of Orientation and Nanoparticles on Melt Fraction of Nano-PCM

Combining the effect of angular orientation of the enclosure and nanomaterial added to the fluid on the melt-fraction of NEPCM is studied. Figures11(a)–11(c) represent the graph plotted between time and melt fraction for different inclinations (0°, 30°, 45°, and 60°) of enclosure filled with 3% Al2O3, 1% CuO, and 3% MWCNT blended nano-PCM, respectively.Figure 11
Effect of orientation in (a)PCM+3% Al2O3, (b) PCM+1% CuO, and (c) PCM+3% MWCNT based nanofluids on melt fraction at Gr=20000.
(a)(b)(c)The volume concentration compared is chosen on the basis of the maximum melt fraction with each nanomaterial. It is observed that the utmost amount of melt is occurring in a container with an orientation of 45° for all the nanofluids, despite having marginal change in liquid fraction. Therefore, it is concluded that the effect of enclosure orientation is negligible compared with the effect of volume fraction of the nanoparticles.From Figure12, it is noted that among Al2O3, CuO, and MWCNT with different concentrations (pure PCM (0%), 1%, 3%, and 5%) blended with the PCM of RT 42 and orientations (0°, 30°, 45°, and 60°), the maximum amount of heat transfer and liquid fraction is attained for (PCM+3% MWCNT) nano-PCM oriented with 45°. With the incorporation of 3% MWCNT/PCM in 45° orientated enclosure, an improvement of 3.4%, 2.04%, and 2.94% melt performance than pure PCM, (PCM/3% Al2O3), (PCM/1% CuO), respectively, is noted.Figure 12
Comparison of melt fraction for 45° oriented enclosure for different nano-PCM atGr=20000.This is because the changes in the thermophysical properties of the MWCNT blended PCM are more substantial than the other nanoparticle concentrated PCM. Also, due to symmetry and less buoyancy effects compared to other orientations, the liquid fraction in 45° orientation is more.


## 2.1. Melting of Pure PCM

Figures5(a)–5(c) show the melt fraction contours of the PCM at three different Grashoff numbers up to 1500 sec with an interval of 500 sec. Red portion in the contour represents the liquefied part of the PCM with a melt fraction as 1.0, and the solid part is described as the blue portion with a melt fraction as 0.0. In between, the different colours of the contours represent the mushy region. It is observed that during the initial stages of melting, the liquid-fraction region is almost vertical as shown in Figure 5(a). This clearly shows that the initial mode of heat transfer was by conduction. After some time, the conduction dominant zone is converted into mixed conduction and convection zone by transforming the solid PCM into liquid. The density difference between the solid and liquid makes the material move by natural convection as shown in Figures 6(a)–6(c) for different Gr.Figure 5
Melt-fraction contours of PCM melting for (a)Gr=5000, (b) Gr=13000, and (c) Gr=20000.
(a)(b)(c)Figure 6
Velocity streamlines of pure PCM for Gr (a) 5000, (b) 13000, and (c) 20000.
(a)(b)(c)The movement of the liquid will form upward and downward rotations with small velocities due to the buoyancy forces formed by the temperature difference between hot and cold wall. Also, due to the boundary layer effect by viscosity, the velocity adjacent to the wall is zero, and it gradually increases away from the wall up to the solid portion of the PCM.With the increase in Gr, the rise in hot wall temperature is evident, and the availability of melted PCM will be more; therefore, more velocity has been observed. ForGr=20000, the highest velocity noted is 4.174e-4 m/s which is 51.23% and 32.97% higher than Gr=5000 and 13000 case.Figure7 depicts the effect of Gr on the temperature of the PCM with respect to time. It is noted that the temperature has been increased with Gr for a period of time; afterward, it comes to a steady state. It is also identified that the slope of the temperature lines are reducing with respect to Gr, indicating that the rate of attaining steady state is less with increase in Gr. The amount of heat transferred to the PCM is stored in the form of phase change. With the increase in temperature, the amount of melting rate also improved from 24.16% to 25.44%, 76% to 76.35%, and 86.4% to 86.417% for Gr=5000, 13000, and 20000, respectively. For the same time period, the melted region is more for Gr=20000.Figure 7
The effect of Gr on temperature of PCM with time.


## 2.2. Melting of PCM in an Enclosure with Angular Orientations

Transient thermal analysis of a square enclosure filled with the PCM, oriented in different angles (0°, 30°, 45°, and 60°), as shown in Figure1 is performed. Figure 8 shows the melt-fraction contours for different Gr (5000, 13000, and 20000) and varying time intervals (500 s, 1000 s, and 1500 s).Figure 8
Melt-fraction contours of pure PCM in a container oriented in (a) 0°, (b) 30°, (c) 45°, and (d) 60°.
(a)(b)(c)(d)Figure9 represents the graph plotted for the variation of melt-fraction of PCM with different orientations (0°, 30°, 45°, and 60°) for a time of 1500 seconds and Gr of 20,000. In the beginning, at around 50 seconds, the PCM in all the containers is in the same stage, the PCM is slowly melting into fluid up to 200 seconds, and later, the material in all the containers attains the steady state. It is observed that the amount of melt is more as the inclination angle increases. The percentage increase of melt fraction is less for different orientations and pure PCM. Using 60° orientation, the melt fraction improved is 2.43%, 0.5%, and 0.08% more than the 0°, 30°, and 45° inclinations.Figure 9
Effect of orientation on melt-fraction with time.


## 2.3. Effect of Nanoparticle Concentration in PCM

The computational analysis on the melting performance of phase change material blended with different nanoparticles (Al2O3/CuO/MWCNT) in various proportions (1%, 3%, and 5%) filled in a square enclosure is carried out. Figures 10(a)–10(c) show the comparison of the melt fraction of nano PCM (PCM+Al2O3/CuO/MWCNT) with different concentrations (1%, 3%, and 5%), respectively. It is clearly visible that the amount of melt fraction is not varied linearly with the volume concentration of the nanomaterial. In the first case with Al2O3, the maximum melt fraction is observed for PCM+3% followed by 1%, pure PCM (0%), and 5%. The melting performance is improved with addition of Al2O3 up to 3%; afterward, it is reduced. This is because of increased density and viscosity. Also, in the beginning of heating PCM, the transfer of energy is predominantly by conduction succeeded by convection. By adding more amounts of high conductive nanomaterials, the heat transfer will again convert into a conductive zone. Therefore, the melting performance reduces.Figure 10
Effect of nanoparticles (a) Al2O3, (b) CuO, and (c) MWCNT with different volume concentrations (1%, 3%, and 5%) on melt fraction at Gr=20000.
(a)(b)(c)With 3% Al2O3, the increase in fluid fraction is 2.9%, 1.38%, and 5.27% more than the melt fraction of 1%, pure PCM, and 5% added nanofluid, respectively. In the second case, in Figure 10(b), though the conductivity of the CuO is more than Al2O3, the enhancement of effective thermal conductivity is very less compared to effective density. Hence, 1% CuO nanomaterial addition has more amount of liquid fraction than 3 and 5% nanofluid. Figure 2 shows the variation of thermophysical properties of nanofluids for different nanoparticle concentration. With 1% CuO, increase in fluid fraction is 2%, 2.924%, and 11% higher than the melt fraction of 3%, pure PCM, and 5% added nano-PCM. With the incorporation of MWCNT nanoparticles (1%, 3%, and 5%) shown in Figure 10(c), the heat transfer is enhanced due to high effective conductivity of the nanofluid, and also the percentage of change in density is less compared to other two nanoparticles. Similar to Al2O3-based nano-PCM, the liquid fraction is more in 3% followed by 1% addition. However, the melt fraction is less in 5% MWCNT due to the effect of thermophysical properties. The increase in fluid fraction of nanofluid blended with 3% MWCNT is 5%, 1.46%, and 2.94% more than pure PCM, 1%, and 5% blended nano-PCM.


## 2.4. Effect of Orientation and Nanoparticles on Melt Fraction of Nano-PCM

Combining the effect of angular orientation of the enclosure and nanomaterial added to the fluid on the melt-fraction of NEPCM is studied. Figures11(a)–11(c) represent the graph plotted between time and melt fraction for different inclinations (0°, 30°, 45°, and 60°) of enclosure filled with 3% Al2O3, 1% CuO, and 3% MWCNT blended nano-PCM, respectively.Figure 11
Effect of orientation in (a)PCM+3% Al2O3, (b) PCM+1% CuO, and (c) PCM+3% MWCNT based nanofluids on melt fraction at Gr=20000.
(a)(b)(c)The volume concentration compared is chosen on the basis of the maximum melt fraction with each nanomaterial. It is observed that the utmost amount of melt is occurring in a container with an orientation of 45° for all the nanofluids, despite having marginal change in liquid fraction. Therefore, it is concluded that the effect of enclosure orientation is negligible compared with the effect of volume fraction of the nanoparticles.From Figure12, it is noted that among Al2O3, CuO, and MWCNT with different concentrations (pure PCM (0%), 1%, 3%, and 5%) blended with the PCM of RT 42 and orientations (0°, 30°, 45°, and 60°), the maximum amount of heat transfer and liquid fraction is attained for (PCM+3% MWCNT) nano-PCM oriented with 45°. With the incorporation of 3% MWCNT/PCM in 45° orientated enclosure, an improvement of 3.4%, 2.04%, and 2.94% melt performance than pure PCM, (PCM/3% Al2O3), (PCM/1% CuO), respectively, is noted.Figure 12
Comparison of melt fraction for 45° oriented enclosure for different nano-PCM atGr=20000.This is because the changes in the thermophysical properties of the MWCNT blended PCM are more substantial than the other nanoparticle concentrated PCM. Also, due to symmetry and less buoyancy effects compared to other orientations, the liquid fraction in 45° orientation is more.


## 3. Conclusions

Numerical analysis on the effect of nanoparticle type (Al2O3, CuO, MWCNT), volume concentration (0%, 1%, 3%, and 5%), and angular orientation of the enclosure (0°, 30°, 45°, and 60°) on the melting of phase change material RT 42 is carried out.It is observed that(i)
For the melting of the pure PCM, it is affirmed that the temperature of the heat source is increased with increase in Gr (5000, 13000, and 20000). Due to this, the heat transfer and melting rate have been enhanced(ii)
The maximum melting fraction is identified forGr=20000. Also, the shape of the melted portion is changed from vertical to parabolic curvature profile indicating that the mode of heat transfer is changed to convection from conduction(iii)
The material properties of phase change material consolidated with nanoparticles (Al2O3, CuO, and MWCNT) into RT 42 PCM are presented. With increase in volume concentration (1%, 3%, and 5%) of the nanoparticles, the effective density, thermal conductivity, and viscosity are increased, while specific heat and latent heat are reduced. The rise in thermal conductivity is very less compared to all other properties(iv)
The liquid fraction content is not varied linearly with respect to volume concentration of the nanoparticles. Comparing pure PCM, greater rate of melting is achieved in 3% Al2O3 and MWCNT, 1% CuO. With 3% Al2O3, the increase in fluid fraction is 2.9%, 1.38%, and 5.27% more than the melt fraction of 1%, pure PCM, and 5% added nanofluid, respectively. With 1% CuO, increase in fluid fraction is 2%, 2.924%, and 11% higher than the melt fraction of 3%, pure phase change material, and 5% added NEPCM. The enhancement in the fluid fraction of nanofluid blended with 3% MWCNT is 5%, 1.46%, and 2.94% more than pure PCM, 1%, and 5% blended nano-PCM(v)
Increasing volume fraction beyond the optimum level reduces the melting performance. This is because of the relative escalation of viscous forces than the buoyancy forces with increase in volume fraction. Also, the convection dominant heat transfer will be shifted to conduction state again(vi)
The enclosure orientation has very negligible effects on the advancement of the melt for both phase change material and NEPCM fluids. In case of pure phase change material, the maximum liquid fraction is seen for a 60° oriented container, while it is a 45° orientation for a nano-PCM case(vii)
Among all the nanoparticles, MWCNT-based nanofluids have a high melting rate. This is mainly because of the substantial development of thermophysical properties of MWCNT than all other nanoparticles blended PCM(viii)
Considering all the effects, the 3% MWCNT nano-PCM oriented in 45° is achieving a larger fraction of melting portion. With the 3% MWCNT/PCM filled enclosure oriented in 45°, an improvement of 3.4%, 2.04%, and 2.94% melt performance than pure PCM, (PCM/3% Al2O3), (PCM/1% CuO), respectively, is noted



---

*Source: 6428469-2022-06-06.xml*