# Structural Changes in Macroinvertebrate Communities Associated with Reduction in the Management of Coastal Saltpans

Authors: P. C. Tavares; D. Alves; M. Shapouri
Journal: Journal of Marine Biology
 (2009)

---

## Abstract

Saltpans with different management levels were studied for macroinvertebrate community and abiotic variables like water depth, water conductivity, and organic matter in sediments. Significant variation was observed between saltpans, between ponds within saltpans, and between periods within ponds for abundance, and also between saltpans for biomass. Environmental variables varied significantly between saltpans and between ponds. Significant positive correlations occurred between depth and total abundance, between depth and Corixidae abundance, and also between organic matter in sediments and diversity. Significant negative correlations were observed between depth and diversity and between organic matter in sediments and total abundance. Multidimensional Scaling and Canonical Correspondence Analysis confirmed results of analysis of variance and correlations. Invertebrate communities were numerically dominant as also revealed by ABC method. Abandoned saltpan ponds show the largest changes in water depth, with communities dominated by some opportunist species, varying within short temporal scales, which is typical from highly disturbed systems.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Macroinvertebrate abundances and diversity can reveal large temporal and spatial variation in coastal wetlands. Part of variation is associated with biological cycles and is inherent to species or subspecies but is also under the control of climate, tides, and management practices which influence several environmental variables. Biological cycles are partly controlled by environmental variables such as temperature, moisture, or light duration; in inshore aquatic habitats, gradients are usually established over small spatial scales for variables like water depth, hydrodynamics, salt concentration, and organic enrichment, which also strongly influence macroinvertebrate communities [1]. Salt concentration is the major factor referred as controlling macroinvertebrate communities in lotic systems [2] and lentic systems, for example, saltpans [3–5]. Water depth and salinity is on the basis of overall changes in macroinvertebrates of saltpans [5], but little is known about the relation between the management state of saltpans and their communities since water management also affects other factors like organic loads entering in the pond systems; from active saltpans to totally abandoned saltpans there is a gradient of conditions, and also among abandoned saltpans we may distinguish between closed and permanently opened to tides.Water management is crucial to human-made and human-modified systems within coastal wetlands (e.g., flooded pasture landscape, ricefields, or saltpans). They are highly productive and provide food and nursery habitats for invertebrates which represent an important sink of food resources for predators; those with suitable conditions such as low water depths and highly energetic insect midges are largely used by breeding populations of birds; they are also used by waders during high tides and shorebirds during severe weather [6]. These seminatural areas have strongly been affected by human pressure, since both structural changes and anthropogenic pollution occur, which led to the loss of their natural value, and to the reduction of several ecosystem services. In the coastal Portuguese saltpans , large areas have been progressively abandoned or destroyed. Species diversity and the uniqueness of species found can be used to assess the effect of human pressure on these areas. The channel and pond network of saltpans has an enormous potential as experimental areas to test the effect of management or its absence on communities. The present work aims to assess the relation between short temporal and spatial changes in macroinvertebrate communities and the management state of saltpans as revealed by water depth, salinity, and organic loads.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Study Area

The study area (Figure1) included the following four coastal wetlands, Ria de Aveiro, Mondego estuary, Tagus estuary, and Sado estuary, Portugal. Two main types of saltpans were considered according to their level of management: with/without salt production (L-I, L-II, see Table 1); in the second type two other subtypes were also distinguished: P. varians production/no production. The study of intersaltpan variation was carried out through saltpans controlled for the same type of fauna (in the overall period of sample collection) belonging to different geographic areas and the same geographic area for Tejo and Sado estuaries (saltpan related effect). Intrasaltpan variation was studied in some saltpans through variation between ponds (pond related effect) and variation between weeks (temporal related effect). Pond related effect was considered for Passa in 2001, Atalaia in 2000, Vasa-Sacos in 2000, and Vau in 2000, 2001 and 2002. Temporal related effect was considered for Esteiro-Furado in 2000, Gala in 2001, Vaia in 2001, and 2002, and Praias-Sado in 2002. Vau, Vaia, and Esteiro-Furado were considered in the study of inter-year variation for 2000, 2001, and 2002.Table 1
Description of type of saltpan, variables, and indices.
variablesymbolDescriptionType of saltpanType L-IPartly managed for salt production (maintenance of low water depths); saltpans:Esteiro-Furado2: EF1, EF2, EF3Passa4: PAS1, PAS2, PAS3Praias-Sado1: PS1, PS2, PS3Type L-IINonmanaged for salt production (oscillation from high waterdepths to dry land); saltpans:Atalaia2: AT1, AT2, AT3 (**)Gala3: GAL1, GAL2, GAL3 (*)Vaia1: VAI1, VAI2, VAI3, VAI4 (**)Vasa-Sacos2: VS1, VS2, VS3 (**)Vau-Nascente2; VN2, VN3, VN4 (*)Vau-Poente2, VP1, VP2, VP3, VP4, VP5 (*)Total abundanceNTotal number of individuals of all groupsRelative abundancePiAbundance of groupiTotal biomassBDry weight of total individualsRelative biomassBiMean dry weight of groupiPercentage of organic matterOMi% of dry weight “loss in ignition” of groupiSpecies richnessSNumber of speciesMargalef indexd(S-1)/loge(N)Shannon-WiennerH′-Σ[Pi·loge(Pi)]Pielou’s evennessJ′H′/loge(S)Simpson index1-λ′1–Σ[Ni·(Ni-1)/(N·(N-1))]Legend:1Sado estuary, 2Tejo estuary, 3Mondego estuary, 4Ria de Aveiro, (*) P. varians production, (**) no production = abandoned.Figure 1
Maps of Europe and Portugal and the localization of coastal wetlands in the study; the coastal lagoon of Aveiro (Ria de Aveiro), and the estuaries of Mondego, Sado, and Tejo (Tagus estuary).


### 2.2. Sampling Methods

Macroinvertebrate samples were collected along 10 m transects with a 1000μm mesh size (70 cm × 30 cm mesh mouth) manually dragging system in the shallow-water column (<45 cm) which included suspended and surface sediment. Three types of replicates were considered: pond replicates (ponds in the same saltpan, n≥3), spatial replicates (sampling points in the same pond, n≥3), and temporal replicates (different single-week time periods in the same pond, n≥3). Environmental variables were characterized simultaneously to sample collection, and they included mean and maximum water depth (cm), salt concentration in water (%), water conductivity (mS cm-1), pH in water and surface sediment, redox potential in water, and surface sediment (mV), temperature in water and surface sediment (°C). Salt concentration was obtained using a traditional handled refractometer, and other parameters were measured using a CyberScan PC 300 multiparameter meter (Eutech Instruments). Sediment samples were collected with 3 petri dishes in each sampling point to the determination of percentage of organic matter in surface sediments.


### 2.3. Sample Treatment

Macroinvertebrate samples were sieved after collection, separated according to taxonomic groups, and promptly frozen at-20°C in the same day of collection. Each saltpan was sampled at each day, but the sampling work of different saltpans was performed in the same sampling period. This method was possible due to the low number of taxonomic groups in saltpans; macroinvertebrates were always identified according to the lowest taxonomic level as possible. Sediment samples were also frozen in the petri dishes. Dry weight (DW) was determined for biomass estimation in macroinvertebrate samples; samples were dried until constant weight at 60°C. Percentage of organic matter in invertebrates and percentage of organic matter in the surface sediment were determined in subsamples through “loss on ignition” (LOI) method at 450°C, after dry weight quantification; Percentage of organic matter was given by the equation %OM=[(DWbeforeignition-DWafterignition) / DWbeforeignition] ×100.


### 2.4. Data Analysis

The structure of macroinvertebrate communities was characterized according to total and relative abundances, diversity, biomasses (dry weight), and percentage of organic matter. Diversity was measured through several ecological indices: Species Richness (S), Margalef index, Shannon-Wienner index (H′), Simpson’s index (1-λ′), and Evenness index, as presented in Table 1. Biomass has been considered as a measure of secondary production [7]. The principles of diversity indices were referred in [8, 9]. Dominance was represented by λ′ and because it is considered as a measure of concentration, 1-λ′ was considered as a diversity index. Multivariate analysis was used in the study of community structure according to the main principles referred in other studies, that is, [10]. Primer 5.0 for Windows version 5.2.9 (Primer-E Ltd) was used for index estimation and Grouping analysis [11]; Clustering and Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) were applied, and results of this last one were graphically presented here. Square root transformation was applied to data and Similarity Matrix was used. Bray-Curtis similarity was chosen as measure of similarity. ANOSIM one-way and two-way crossed analysis was applied in Primer to check for differences between periods, ponds, saltpans, and saltpan’s types. Pearson correlation coefficient was used in the relation between abiotic parameters and community descriptors. BIOENV analysis was also applied in Primer. Brodgar version 2.1.0 (Highland Statistics Ltd) [12] was used for Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) based on square root transformed abundances. Abundance and biomass Curves method, also referred as the ABC method, was applied as proposed by [13] and discussed by [14, 15]. Correlation coefficients or analysis of variance were performed through parametric tests using Statistica 5.5 with 5% as threshold for significance.


## 2.1. Study Area

The study area (Figure1) included the following four coastal wetlands, Ria de Aveiro, Mondego estuary, Tagus estuary, and Sado estuary, Portugal. Two main types of saltpans were considered according to their level of management: with/without salt production (L-I, L-II, see Table 1); in the second type two other subtypes were also distinguished: P. varians production/no production. The study of intersaltpan variation was carried out through saltpans controlled for the same type of fauna (in the overall period of sample collection) belonging to different geographic areas and the same geographic area for Tejo and Sado estuaries (saltpan related effect). Intrasaltpan variation was studied in some saltpans through variation between ponds (pond related effect) and variation between weeks (temporal related effect). Pond related effect was considered for Passa in 2001, Atalaia in 2000, Vasa-Sacos in 2000, and Vau in 2000, 2001 and 2002. Temporal related effect was considered for Esteiro-Furado in 2000, Gala in 2001, Vaia in 2001, and 2002, and Praias-Sado in 2002. Vau, Vaia, and Esteiro-Furado were considered in the study of inter-year variation for 2000, 2001, and 2002.Table 1
Description of type of saltpan, variables, and indices.
variablesymbolDescriptionType of saltpanType L-IPartly managed for salt production (maintenance of low water depths); saltpans:Esteiro-Furado2: EF1, EF2, EF3Passa4: PAS1, PAS2, PAS3Praias-Sado1: PS1, PS2, PS3Type L-IINonmanaged for salt production (oscillation from high waterdepths to dry land); saltpans:Atalaia2: AT1, AT2, AT3 (**)Gala3: GAL1, GAL2, GAL3 (*)Vaia1: VAI1, VAI2, VAI3, VAI4 (**)Vasa-Sacos2: VS1, VS2, VS3 (**)Vau-Nascente2; VN2, VN3, VN4 (*)Vau-Poente2, VP1, VP2, VP3, VP4, VP5 (*)Total abundanceNTotal number of individuals of all groupsRelative abundancePiAbundance of groupiTotal biomassBDry weight of total individualsRelative biomassBiMean dry weight of groupiPercentage of organic matterOMi% of dry weight “loss in ignition” of groupiSpecies richnessSNumber of speciesMargalef indexd(S-1)/loge(N)Shannon-WiennerH′-Σ[Pi·loge(Pi)]Pielou’s evennessJ′H′/loge(S)Simpson index1-λ′1–Σ[Ni·(Ni-1)/(N·(N-1))]Legend:1Sado estuary, 2Tejo estuary, 3Mondego estuary, 4Ria de Aveiro, (*) P. varians production, (**) no production = abandoned.Figure 1
Maps of Europe and Portugal and the localization of coastal wetlands in the study; the coastal lagoon of Aveiro (Ria de Aveiro), and the estuaries of Mondego, Sado, and Tejo (Tagus estuary).


## 2.2. Sampling Methods

Macroinvertebrate samples were collected along 10 m transects with a 1000μm mesh size (70 cm × 30 cm mesh mouth) manually dragging system in the shallow-water column (<45 cm) which included suspended and surface sediment. Three types of replicates were considered: pond replicates (ponds in the same saltpan, n≥3), spatial replicates (sampling points in the same pond, n≥3), and temporal replicates (different single-week time periods in the same pond, n≥3). Environmental variables were characterized simultaneously to sample collection, and they included mean and maximum water depth (cm), salt concentration in water (%), water conductivity (mS cm-1), pH in water and surface sediment, redox potential in water, and surface sediment (mV), temperature in water and surface sediment (°C). Salt concentration was obtained using a traditional handled refractometer, and other parameters were measured using a CyberScan PC 300 multiparameter meter (Eutech Instruments). Sediment samples were collected with 3 petri dishes in each sampling point to the determination of percentage of organic matter in surface sediments.


## 2.3. Sample Treatment

Macroinvertebrate samples were sieved after collection, separated according to taxonomic groups, and promptly frozen at-20°C in the same day of collection. Each saltpan was sampled at each day, but the sampling work of different saltpans was performed in the same sampling period. This method was possible due to the low number of taxonomic groups in saltpans; macroinvertebrates were always identified according to the lowest taxonomic level as possible. Sediment samples were also frozen in the petri dishes. Dry weight (DW) was determined for biomass estimation in macroinvertebrate samples; samples were dried until constant weight at 60°C. Percentage of organic matter in invertebrates and percentage of organic matter in the surface sediment were determined in subsamples through “loss on ignition” (LOI) method at 450°C, after dry weight quantification; Percentage of organic matter was given by the equation %OM=[(DWbeforeignition-DWafterignition) / DWbeforeignition] ×100.


## 2.4. Data Analysis

The structure of macroinvertebrate communities was characterized according to total and relative abundances, diversity, biomasses (dry weight), and percentage of organic matter. Diversity was measured through several ecological indices: Species Richness (S), Margalef index, Shannon-Wienner index (H′), Simpson’s index (1-λ′), and Evenness index, as presented in Table 1. Biomass has been considered as a measure of secondary production [7]. The principles of diversity indices were referred in [8, 9]. Dominance was represented by λ′ and because it is considered as a measure of concentration, 1-λ′ was considered as a diversity index. Multivariate analysis was used in the study of community structure according to the main principles referred in other studies, that is, [10]. Primer 5.0 for Windows version 5.2.9 (Primer-E Ltd) was used for index estimation and Grouping analysis [11]; Clustering and Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) were applied, and results of this last one were graphically presented here. Square root transformation was applied to data and Similarity Matrix was used. Bray-Curtis similarity was chosen as measure of similarity. ANOSIM one-way and two-way crossed analysis was applied in Primer to check for differences between periods, ponds, saltpans, and saltpan’s types. Pearson correlation coefficient was used in the relation between abiotic parameters and community descriptors. BIOENV analysis was also applied in Primer. Brodgar version 2.1.0 (Highland Statistics Ltd) [12] was used for Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) based on square root transformed abundances. Abundance and biomass Curves method, also referred as the ABC method, was applied as proposed by [13] and discussed by [14, 15]. Correlation coefficients or analysis of variance were performed through parametric tests using Statistica 5.5 with 5% as threshold for significance.


## 3. Results

Insects accounted for the highest number of taxonomic groups (11 taxa), and the highest number of individuals per group per sample (31488 individuals), and were represented by different life stages (Table2); Corixidae (nymph and adult), Chironomidae (larvae and pupae), Hydrophilidae (larvae and adult), and Dytiscidae (larvae and adult) occurred in most saltpans. The crustacean P. varians dominated in part of saltpans nonmanaged for salt production. Insecta larvae from Ephydridae occurred in Passa, Esteiro-Furado, and Praias-Sado, all active saltpans. The crustacean A. salinaoccurred in Esteiro-Furado (L-I saltpans, see Table 1). The isopod L. rugicauda occurred in Vau-Poente, the polychaetes C. capitata and H. diversicoloroccurred in Vaia, and the gastropod H. ulvaeoccurred within macroalgae in Vaia and Gala (L-II saltpans, Table 1).Table 2
Taxonomic groups in macroinvertebrate communities.
Genus or speciesLife stageCodeMalacostraca,Amphipoda, CorophiidaeCorophium insidiosumCPHAmphipoda GammaridaeGammarus subtypicusANFIsopoda, SphaeromatidaeLekanosphaera rugicaudaISODecapoda, PalaemonidaePalaemonetes variansCAMBranchiopoda, Anostraca, ArtemidaeArtemia salinaARTInsecta,Heteroptera, CorixidaeCorixa sp.nimph (a);COR-N;adult (a)COR-AHeteroptera, Noctonectidaenimph (a)NOCTDiptera,ChironomidaeChironomus spp.larvae (a);CHI-L;pupae (a);CHI-P;adult (t)CHI-ADiptera, EphydridaeEphydra sp.larvae (a);EPHY-L;pupae (a);EPHY-P;adult (t)EPHY-ADiptera, Dolicophoridaelarvae (a)DOLIDiptera, Limonidaelarvae (a)DIPDiptera, CulicidaeDIPTColeoptera, HydrophilidaeBerosus sp.larvae (a);BER-L;adult (t)BER-AEnochrus sp.larvae (a);ENO-L;adult (t)ENO-AHydrobius sp.larvae (a);HDB-L;adult (t)HDB-AColeoptera, DytiscidaeCoelambus sp.larvae (a);DYT-L;adult (t)DYT-AGastropoda, HydrobiidaeHydrobia ulvaeGASPolychaeta,NereididaeHediste diversicolorHEDPolychaeta, CapitellidaeCapitella capitataCAPOligochaeta n.i.OLI(a) aquatic, (t) terrestrial.


### 3.1. Saltpan Related Effect

Total abundance varied significantly between saltpans in 2000 (one-way ANOVA,F4,28=10.0, P<.001); total abundance in Esteiro-Furado was significantly higher than in Vau, Atalaia, and Vasa-Sacos, and total abundance in Vaia was significantly higher than in Vasa-Sacos (Tukey, P<.05). Total abundance also varied significantly between saltpans for 2001 (one-way ANOVA, F3,40=3.32, P<.05). The highest relative abundance values were observed for the crustacean A. salinain Esteiro-Furado, followed by Corixidae adults in Vaia during 2000. During 2000, relative abundance varied significantly between saltpans in several macroinvertebrate groups, as shown in Table 3 (one-way ANOVA). Vaia showed significantly higher abundance of Corixidae adults than other saltpans, and Vau showed significantly higher abundance of Corixidae adults than Esteiro-Furado, Vasa-Sacos, or Atalaia (Tukey, P<.05). Vau showed significantly higher abundance of Corixidae nymphs than Vasa-Sacos or Esteiro-Furado (Tukey, P<.05). Esteiro-Furado showed significantly higher abundance of Ephydridae pupae than Vasa-Sacos, Vau, or Atlalaia (Tukey, P<.05). In 2001 relative abundance varied significantly between saltpans for several groups as presented in Table 3 (one-way ANOVA); Vaia showed significantly higher abundance of Corixidae adults or nymphs than other saltpans (Tukey, P<.05), Passa showed significantly higher abundance of Chironomidae larvae than others (Tukey, P<.05), Vau showed significantly higher abundance of Berosus sp. larvae than others (Tukey, P<.05), and Gala showed significantly higher abundance of Berosus sp. adults than Vaia or Passa (Tukey, P<.05). In 2002, relative abundance varied significantly between saltpans for three groups as observed in Table 3 (one-way ANOVA); Vau showed significantly higher abundance of L. rugicauda (Tukey, P<.05), and Praias-Sado showed significantly higher abundance of Ephydridae (Tukey, P<.05) comparing to other saltpans.Table 3
Significant differences between saltpans and between ponds for relative abundances of macroinvertebrate groups (one-way ANOVA).
(a)
Saltpan related effect
200020012002Corixidae adultF4,28=440.9, P<.001F3,40=6.7, P<.01Corixidae nymphF4,28=2.5, P<.05F3,40=6.2, P<.01Ephydridae larvaeF4,28=3.1, P<.05Ephydridae pupaeF4,28=3.6, P<.05F3,40=10.8, P<.01Chironomidae larvaeF3,40=2.9, P<.05Berosus sp. larvaeF3,40=6.6, P<.01Berosus sp. adultF3,40=3.8, P<.05L. rugicaudaF3,40=3.6, P<.05F3,40=32.2, P<.001P. variansF2,7=5.3, P<.05(b)
Pond related effect
200020012002Corixidae nymph1F2,6=7.2, P<.05Ephydridae pupae3F4,9=11.2, P<.01Chironomidae larvae1F2,4=9.3, P<.05Chironomidae pupae1F2,4=21.6, P<.01Berosus sp. larvae1F2,4=5.3, P<.05Enochrus sp. adult2F2,4=43.0, P<0.01Legend:1Atalaia ponds; 2Vasa-Sacos ponds; 3Vau ponds (VP2, VP3, VP4).Total dry biomass in macroinvertebrates varied significantly between saltpans in 2000 (one-way ANOVA,F4,24=17.8, P<.001); Esteiro-Furado showed significantly higher total biomass than other saltpans, and Vaia showed significantly higher total biomass than Vau, Atalaia, and Vasa-Sacos (Tukey, P<.05). Mean percentage of organic matter in macroinvertebrates varied significantly between saltpans in 2000 (one-way ANOVA, F4,24=12.6, P<.001) and Esteiro-Furado revealed a significantly higher value than other saltpans (Tukey, P<.05). Biomass also varied significantly between saltpans for Corixidae adults (one-way ANOVA, F3,19=97.6, P<.001) and Vaia showed significantly higher value than other saltpans in 2000 (Tukey, P<.05). The highest biomass values were observed for Corixidae adults at Vaia, followed by A. salina at Esteiro-Furado. Percentage of organic matter in macroinvertebrates varied between saltpans for Corixidae nymphs (one-way ANOVA, F3,15=3.4, P<.05), P. varians(one-way ANOVA, F3,12=7.4, P<.01), and Ephydridae pupae (one-way ANOVA, F2,6=33.9, P<.001).Esteiro-Furado samples were clearly grouped in a single separated group as shown in MDS, considering abundances (Figure2) and biomass (Figure 3) in 2000. Grouping analysis in other years gave some relevance to Passa (PAS1) in 2001, and Vau (VP) in 2002 which represented the most different samples comparing to others (Figure 2). ANOSIM one-way analysis confirmed significant differences through dissimilarities between overall sampled saltpans (Global R=0.51; significance level 0.1%,P<.001) and between saltpan’s types; between saltpans with/without salt production (Global R=0.68; significance level 0.1%,P<.001) and between saltpans with salt production/P. varians production/no production (Global R=0.35; significance level 0.1%,P<.001) (see Table 1). Two-way crossed analysis of factors Saltpan × Type also revealed significant effects (Global R=0.35 for salt/no production, and Global R=0.38 for salt/P.varians/no production; significance level 0.1%,P<.001).Plot of Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) using Bray-Curtis similarity matrix of macroinvertebrate abundances from 2000 (up) to 2002 (down). 1,2,3: pond replicates; a, b, c: spatial replicates within pond; 00, 01, 02: years; VN/VP: Vau; VAI: Vaia; AT: Atalaia; EF: Esteiro-Furado; VS: Vasa-Sacos; PAS: Passa, GAL: Gala; PS: Praias-Sado.Figure 3
Plot of Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) using Bray-Curtis similarity matrix of macroinvertebrate biomasses (dry weight) in 2000. 1,2,3: pond replicates; a, b, c: spatial replicates within pond;  VN: Vau; VAI: Vaia; AT: Atalaia; EF: Esteiro-Furado; VS: Vasa-Sacos.Diversity indices varied significantly between saltpans in 2000, considering Species Richness (one-way ANOVA,F4,28=2.9,P<.05), Margalef index (one-way ANOVA, F4,28=4.1, P<.05), or Shannon-Wienner index (one-way ANOVA, F4,28=5.3, P<.01); Vasa-Sacos revealed significantly higher diversity than Esteiro-Furado using Margalef index and significantly higher diversity than Esteiro-Furado or Vau using Shannon-Wienner index (Tukey, P<.05). Diversity indices varied significantly between saltpans in 2001 considering Shannon-Wienner index (one-way ANOVA, F3,40=3.8, P<.05); Vau revealed significantly higher value than Passa (Tukey, P<.05).Mean water depth varied significantly between saltpans in 2001 (one-way ANOVA,F3,35=15.6, P<.001) and 2002 (one-way ANOVA, F6,16=3.9, P<.05). Maximum water depth varied significantly between saltpans in 2002 (one-way ANOVA, F2,6=6.9, P<.05) and Vau revealed significantly higher depth than Praias-Sado (Tukey, P<.05). Salt concentration in water varied significantly between saltpans in 2001 (one-way ANOVA, F3,27=26.0, P<.001) and 2002 (one-way ANOVA, F2,6=14.3, P<.01). Vau showed significantly lower salt concentration than Vaia or Praias-Sado in 2002 (Tukey, P<.05). Water conductivity varied significantly between saltpans in 2001 (one-way ANOVA, F3,31=64.8, P<.001) and 2002 (one-way ANOVA, F2,7=12.5, P<.01). Vau also showed significantly lower conductivity than Vaia and Praias-Sado in 2002 (Tukey, P<.05). Percentage of organic matter in sediment varied significantly between saltpans in 2002 (one-way ANOVA, F3,53=3.8, P<.05).Significant positive correlations were observed between total abundance and total biomass, between total abundance and percentage of organic matter in macroinvertebrates, and between total biomass and percentage of organic matter in macroinvertebrates (Table4). Significant negative correlations were observed between diversity and total abundance and between diversity and total biomass (Table 4). Abundance curve was above the biomass curve throughout its length for Vau, Atalaia, Esteiro-Furado, and Vaia. In Vasa-Sacos, biomass and abundance curves were close from each other, they crossed each other twice, and biomass curve was above the abundance curve in a small part of its length (Figure 4).Table 4
Significant Pearson correlation coefficientsr(Pearson r,P<.05) between total abundance, total biomass, diversity indices, and percentage of organic matter in macroinvertebrate communities.
Total abundanceTotal biomass (dry weigh)Total abundance—r=0.70,P<.001Species richnessr=-0.40,P<.05r=-0.39,P<.05Margalef indexr=-0.53,P<.01r=-0.48,P<.01Shannon-Wiennerr=-0.69,P<.001r=-0.46,P<.05Pielou’s evenessr=-0.59,P<.01n.s.Simpson’s indexr=-0.70,P<.001r=-0.45,P<.05OM in macroinvertebrates (%)r=0.88,P<.001r=0.70,P<.001n.s. : nonsignificant.Abundance biomass curves for macroinvertebrate communities in 2000. abund: Abundance; biom: Biomass; VN: Vau; AT: Atalaia; EF: Esteiro-Furado; VS: Vasa-Sacos; VAI: Vaia.


### 3.2. Pond Related Effect

Total abundance varied significantly between ponds of Vasa-Sacos in 2000 (one-way ANOVA,F2,4=83.9, P<.001) and between ponds of Vau in 2002 (one-way ANOVA, F4,9=4.8, P<.001). Relative abundances varied significantly between ponds of saltpans for several macroinvertebrate groups (Table 3).Grouping analysis of abundances revealed that ponds from the same saltpan might be in different groups, as in the case of ponds from Atalaia in 2000 (Figure2). ANOSIM one-way analysis confirmed significant differences between saltpan ponds (Global R=0.73; significance level 0.1%,P<0.001). Two-way crossed analysis of factors Saltpan × Pond revealed significant effect (Global R=0.64; significance level 0.1%,P<.001).Diversity indices varied significantly between ponds of Atalaia in 2000 for Species Richness (one-way ANOVA,F2,6=6.6, P<.05) and Margalef index (one-way ANOVA, F2,6=5.6, P<.05). Diversity indices varied significantly between ponds of Vasa-Sacos in 2000 for Margalef index (one-way ANOVA, F2,4=8.2, P<.05) and Shannon-Wienner index (one-way ANOVA, F2,4=7.0, P<.05). Diversity indices also varied significantly between ponds of Vau in 2001 for Margalef index (one-way ANOVA, F4,9=4.3, P<.05) and Shannon-Wienner index (one-way ANOVA, F4,9=7.0, P<.05).Mean water depth varied significantly between ponds of Vau in 2002 (one-way ANOVA,F3,8=20.5, P<.001). Conductivity also varied significantly between ponds of Vau in 2002 (one-way ANOVA, F3,8=123.9, P<.001). Redox Potential in water varied significantly between ponds from Vau in 2002 (one-way ANOVA, F3,7=6.2, P<.05). Percentage of organic matter in sediment varied significantly between Vaia ponds, VAI-R1 (channel), VAI-R2 (1st evaporation pond), and VAI-R3 (2nd evaporation pond), (one-way ANOVA, F2,7=84.4, P<.001) and also between Vau ponds, VP1, VP2, VP3, and VP4 (one-way ANOVA, F3,11=6.6, P<.01) in 2002. VAI-R3 showed a mean value significantly higher than VAI-R2 and VAI-R1, and VP4 showed a mean value significantly higher than VP1 (Tukey, P<.05).


### 3.3. Temporal Related Effect

Significant variation was observed between weeks at Gala in 2001 for abundance of Chironomidae pupae (one-way ANOVA,F2,6=9.4, P<.05). No significant variation was observed between weeks for total abundance or diversity in Gala. No significant variation was observed between weeks for macroinvertebrates in the other saltpan ponds tested for the temporal related effect, Vaia, Esteiro-Furado, and Praias-Sado (ANOVA, P>.05). ANOSIM one-way analysis did not revealed significant dissimilarities between periods (Global R=0.23), and no significant effect was observed for two-way analysis of factors Saltpan × Period (R=0.19). No significant variation was observed between weeks for abiotic variables.


### 3.4. Environment and Macroinvertebrates

Mean water depth was significantly negatively correlated with water conductivity in 2002 (Pearsonr=-0.34, P<.05). Mean water depth was significantly positively correlated with redox potential in water in 2002 (Pearson r=0.44, P<.01). Redox potential in water was significantly negatively correlated with pH in water during 2001 (Pearson r=-0.40, P<.001). Significant positive correlations were observed between water depth and total abundance and between water depth and abundance of Corixidae nymphs (Table 5). Significant negative correlation was observed between water depth and diversity (Table 5). Percentage of organic matter in sediment was significantly negatively correlated with total abundance and significantly positively correlated with diversity (Table 5). BIOENV analysis confirmed significant positive correlations between some macroinvertebrate groups and abiotic variables such as organic matter in sediments and water conductivity. Conductivity was a very important variable since it was present in almost all results. The most relevant results were observed for gastropods (r=0.96), amphipods (r=0.93), and also larvae of insects from Hydrophilidae (Berosus sp., r=0.91; Enochrus sp., r=0.93) and Dytiscidae (r=0.94).Table 5
Significant Pearson correlation coefficientsr (Pearson r,P<.05) between abiotic variables, and total abundance, diversity indices, relative abundance, and percentage of organic matter in macroinvertebrate communities.
Max_depthMean_depthSaltOM in sediments (%)Total abundancer=0.42,P<.05r=0.42,P<.05n.s.r=-0.48,P<.05Species richnessn.s.n.s.r=0.42,P<.05r=0.50,P<.01Margalef  indexn.s.n.s.n.s.r=0.60,P<.01Shannon-Wiennerr=−0.41,P<.05r=−0.57,P<.01n.s.r=0.70,P<.001Pielou’s evenessr=-0.46,P<.05r=-0.59,P<.01n.s.r=0.62,P<.01Simpson’s indexn.s.r=-0.53,P<.01n.s.r=0.63,P<.01Relative abundance (COR-N)n.s.r=0.42,P<.05n.s.n.s.OM in macroinvertebrates (%)n.s.n.s.n.s.r=0.52,P<.05Legend: Max_depth - maximum water depth (cm); Mean_depth: mean water depth (cm); Salt: salt concentration in water (%); OM: percentage of organic matter (%); COR-N: Corixidae nymph; n.s.: non significant.Higher conductivity values and the presence of Ephydridae larvae in PAS1 pond in 2001 and lower conductivity values of VP3, VP4, and VP5 ponds in 2001 were in accordance with CCA (Figure5). CCA confirmed the negative correlation between water depth and conductivity, in 2002. Higher water depth, lower conductivity and the presence of P. varians increment at VP3 pond in 2002 were also reflected in CCA. The displacement of VP4 pond relative to other ponds in CCA was in accordance with the higher percentage of organic matter in sediment observed in this pond. The presence of Ephydridae larvae, pupae and adults, and Dytiscidae and Hydrophilidae adults in Praias-Sado ponds in 2002 also seem to be in accordance with placement of these ponds together in CCA.Biplots of sampling points and explanatory variables (up) and biplots of sampling points and response variables (down) from Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) using abundances in 2001 (left) and 2002 (right). 1, 2, 3, 4: pond replicates; VP: Vau; VAI: Vaia; PAS: Passa; GAL: Gala; PS: Praias-Sado; COR: Corixidae; CHI: Chironomidae; BER:Berosussp.; ENO: Enochrus sp.; DYT: Dytiscidae; CAM: P. varians; ANF: G. subtypicus; ISO: L. rugicauda; EPHY: Ephydridae; ART: A. salina; CPH- C. insidiosum; GAS: H. ulvae; DOLI: Dolicophoridae; NOCT: Noctonectidae; CAP: C. capitata; HED: H. diversicolor; HETT: Oligochaeta n.i.; cond: water conductivity (mS cm-1); redox: Redox Potential in water (mV); depth: mean water depth (cm); Temp: water temperature (°C); OM: percentage of organic matter in surface sediment (%).


## 3.1. Saltpan Related Effect

Total abundance varied significantly between saltpans in 2000 (one-way ANOVA,F4,28=10.0, P<.001); total abundance in Esteiro-Furado was significantly higher than in Vau, Atalaia, and Vasa-Sacos, and total abundance in Vaia was significantly higher than in Vasa-Sacos (Tukey, P<.05). Total abundance also varied significantly between saltpans for 2001 (one-way ANOVA, F3,40=3.32, P<.05). The highest relative abundance values were observed for the crustacean A. salinain Esteiro-Furado, followed by Corixidae adults in Vaia during 2000. During 2000, relative abundance varied significantly between saltpans in several macroinvertebrate groups, as shown in Table 3 (one-way ANOVA). Vaia showed significantly higher abundance of Corixidae adults than other saltpans, and Vau showed significantly higher abundance of Corixidae adults than Esteiro-Furado, Vasa-Sacos, or Atalaia (Tukey, P<.05). Vau showed significantly higher abundance of Corixidae nymphs than Vasa-Sacos or Esteiro-Furado (Tukey, P<.05). Esteiro-Furado showed significantly higher abundance of Ephydridae pupae than Vasa-Sacos, Vau, or Atlalaia (Tukey, P<.05). In 2001 relative abundance varied significantly between saltpans for several groups as presented in Table 3 (one-way ANOVA); Vaia showed significantly higher abundance of Corixidae adults or nymphs than other saltpans (Tukey, P<.05), Passa showed significantly higher abundance of Chironomidae larvae than others (Tukey, P<.05), Vau showed significantly higher abundance of Berosus sp. larvae than others (Tukey, P<.05), and Gala showed significantly higher abundance of Berosus sp. adults than Vaia or Passa (Tukey, P<.05). In 2002, relative abundance varied significantly between saltpans for three groups as observed in Table 3 (one-way ANOVA); Vau showed significantly higher abundance of L. rugicauda (Tukey, P<.05), and Praias-Sado showed significantly higher abundance of Ephydridae (Tukey, P<.05) comparing to other saltpans.Table 3
Significant differences between saltpans and between ponds for relative abundances of macroinvertebrate groups (one-way ANOVA).
(a)
Saltpan related effect
200020012002Corixidae adultF4,28=440.9, P<.001F3,40=6.7, P<.01Corixidae nymphF4,28=2.5, P<.05F3,40=6.2, P<.01Ephydridae larvaeF4,28=3.1, P<.05Ephydridae pupaeF4,28=3.6, P<.05F3,40=10.8, P<.01Chironomidae larvaeF3,40=2.9, P<.05Berosus sp. larvaeF3,40=6.6, P<.01Berosus sp. adultF3,40=3.8, P<.05L. rugicaudaF3,40=3.6, P<.05F3,40=32.2, P<.001P. variansF2,7=5.3, P<.05(b)
Pond related effect
200020012002Corixidae nymph1F2,6=7.2, P<.05Ephydridae pupae3F4,9=11.2, P<.01Chironomidae larvae1F2,4=9.3, P<.05Chironomidae pupae1F2,4=21.6, P<.01Berosus sp. larvae1F2,4=5.3, P<.05Enochrus sp. adult2F2,4=43.0, P<0.01Legend:1Atalaia ponds; 2Vasa-Sacos ponds; 3Vau ponds (VP2, VP3, VP4).Total dry biomass in macroinvertebrates varied significantly between saltpans in 2000 (one-way ANOVA,F4,24=17.8, P<.001); Esteiro-Furado showed significantly higher total biomass than other saltpans, and Vaia showed significantly higher total biomass than Vau, Atalaia, and Vasa-Sacos (Tukey, P<.05). Mean percentage of organic matter in macroinvertebrates varied significantly between saltpans in 2000 (one-way ANOVA, F4,24=12.6, P<.001) and Esteiro-Furado revealed a significantly higher value than other saltpans (Tukey, P<.05). Biomass also varied significantly between saltpans for Corixidae adults (one-way ANOVA, F3,19=97.6, P<.001) and Vaia showed significantly higher value than other saltpans in 2000 (Tukey, P<.05). The highest biomass values were observed for Corixidae adults at Vaia, followed by A. salina at Esteiro-Furado. Percentage of organic matter in macroinvertebrates varied between saltpans for Corixidae nymphs (one-way ANOVA, F3,15=3.4, P<.05), P. varians(one-way ANOVA, F3,12=7.4, P<.01), and Ephydridae pupae (one-way ANOVA, F2,6=33.9, P<.001).Esteiro-Furado samples were clearly grouped in a single separated group as shown in MDS, considering abundances (Figure2) and biomass (Figure 3) in 2000. Grouping analysis in other years gave some relevance to Passa (PAS1) in 2001, and Vau (VP) in 2002 which represented the most different samples comparing to others (Figure 2). ANOSIM one-way analysis confirmed significant differences through dissimilarities between overall sampled saltpans (Global R=0.51; significance level 0.1%,P<.001) and between saltpan’s types; between saltpans with/without salt production (Global R=0.68; significance level 0.1%,P<.001) and between saltpans with salt production/P. varians production/no production (Global R=0.35; significance level 0.1%,P<.001) (see Table 1). Two-way crossed analysis of factors Saltpan × Type also revealed significant effects (Global R=0.35 for salt/no production, and Global R=0.38 for salt/P.varians/no production; significance level 0.1%,P<.001).Plot of Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) using Bray-Curtis similarity matrix of macroinvertebrate abundances from 2000 (up) to 2002 (down). 1,2,3: pond replicates; a, b, c: spatial replicates within pond; 00, 01, 02: years; VN/VP: Vau; VAI: Vaia; AT: Atalaia; EF: Esteiro-Furado; VS: Vasa-Sacos; PAS: Passa, GAL: Gala; PS: Praias-Sado.Figure 3
Plot of Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) using Bray-Curtis similarity matrix of macroinvertebrate biomasses (dry weight) in 2000. 1,2,3: pond replicates; a, b, c: spatial replicates within pond;  VN: Vau; VAI: Vaia; AT: Atalaia; EF: Esteiro-Furado; VS: Vasa-Sacos.Diversity indices varied significantly between saltpans in 2000, considering Species Richness (one-way ANOVA,F4,28=2.9,P<.05), Margalef index (one-way ANOVA, F4,28=4.1, P<.05), or Shannon-Wienner index (one-way ANOVA, F4,28=5.3, P<.01); Vasa-Sacos revealed significantly higher diversity than Esteiro-Furado using Margalef index and significantly higher diversity than Esteiro-Furado or Vau using Shannon-Wienner index (Tukey, P<.05). Diversity indices varied significantly between saltpans in 2001 considering Shannon-Wienner index (one-way ANOVA, F3,40=3.8, P<.05); Vau revealed significantly higher value than Passa (Tukey, P<.05).Mean water depth varied significantly between saltpans in 2001 (one-way ANOVA,F3,35=15.6, P<.001) and 2002 (one-way ANOVA, F6,16=3.9, P<.05). Maximum water depth varied significantly between saltpans in 2002 (one-way ANOVA, F2,6=6.9, P<.05) and Vau revealed significantly higher depth than Praias-Sado (Tukey, P<.05). Salt concentration in water varied significantly between saltpans in 2001 (one-way ANOVA, F3,27=26.0, P<.001) and 2002 (one-way ANOVA, F2,6=14.3, P<.01). Vau showed significantly lower salt concentration than Vaia or Praias-Sado in 2002 (Tukey, P<.05). Water conductivity varied significantly between saltpans in 2001 (one-way ANOVA, F3,31=64.8, P<.001) and 2002 (one-way ANOVA, F2,7=12.5, P<.01). Vau also showed significantly lower conductivity than Vaia and Praias-Sado in 2002 (Tukey, P<.05). Percentage of organic matter in sediment varied significantly between saltpans in 2002 (one-way ANOVA, F3,53=3.8, P<.05).Significant positive correlations were observed between total abundance and total biomass, between total abundance and percentage of organic matter in macroinvertebrates, and between total biomass and percentage of organic matter in macroinvertebrates (Table4). Significant negative correlations were observed between diversity and total abundance and between diversity and total biomass (Table 4). Abundance curve was above the biomass curve throughout its length for Vau, Atalaia, Esteiro-Furado, and Vaia. In Vasa-Sacos, biomass and abundance curves were close from each other, they crossed each other twice, and biomass curve was above the abundance curve in a small part of its length (Figure 4).Table 4
Significant Pearson correlation coefficientsr(Pearson r,P<.05) between total abundance, total biomass, diversity indices, and percentage of organic matter in macroinvertebrate communities.
Total abundanceTotal biomass (dry weigh)Total abundance—r=0.70,P<.001Species richnessr=-0.40,P<.05r=-0.39,P<.05Margalef indexr=-0.53,P<.01r=-0.48,P<.01Shannon-Wiennerr=-0.69,P<.001r=-0.46,P<.05Pielou’s evenessr=-0.59,P<.01n.s.Simpson’s indexr=-0.70,P<.001r=-0.45,P<.05OM in macroinvertebrates (%)r=0.88,P<.001r=0.70,P<.001n.s. : nonsignificant.Abundance biomass curves for macroinvertebrate communities in 2000. abund: Abundance; biom: Biomass; VN: Vau; AT: Atalaia; EF: Esteiro-Furado; VS: Vasa-Sacos; VAI: Vaia.


## 3.2. Pond Related Effect

Total abundance varied significantly between ponds of Vasa-Sacos in 2000 (one-way ANOVA,F2,4=83.9, P<.001) and between ponds of Vau in 2002 (one-way ANOVA, F4,9=4.8, P<.001). Relative abundances varied significantly between ponds of saltpans for several macroinvertebrate groups (Table 3).Grouping analysis of abundances revealed that ponds from the same saltpan might be in different groups, as in the case of ponds from Atalaia in 2000 (Figure2). ANOSIM one-way analysis confirmed significant differences between saltpan ponds (Global R=0.73; significance level 0.1%,P<0.001). Two-way crossed analysis of factors Saltpan × Pond revealed significant effect (Global R=0.64; significance level 0.1%,P<.001).Diversity indices varied significantly between ponds of Atalaia in 2000 for Species Richness (one-way ANOVA,F2,6=6.6, P<.05) and Margalef index (one-way ANOVA, F2,6=5.6, P<.05). Diversity indices varied significantly between ponds of Vasa-Sacos in 2000 for Margalef index (one-way ANOVA, F2,4=8.2, P<.05) and Shannon-Wienner index (one-way ANOVA, F2,4=7.0, P<.05). Diversity indices also varied significantly between ponds of Vau in 2001 for Margalef index (one-way ANOVA, F4,9=4.3, P<.05) and Shannon-Wienner index (one-way ANOVA, F4,9=7.0, P<.05).Mean water depth varied significantly between ponds of Vau in 2002 (one-way ANOVA,F3,8=20.5, P<.001). Conductivity also varied significantly between ponds of Vau in 2002 (one-way ANOVA, F3,8=123.9, P<.001). Redox Potential in water varied significantly between ponds from Vau in 2002 (one-way ANOVA, F3,7=6.2, P<.05). Percentage of organic matter in sediment varied significantly between Vaia ponds, VAI-R1 (channel), VAI-R2 (1st evaporation pond), and VAI-R3 (2nd evaporation pond), (one-way ANOVA, F2,7=84.4, P<.001) and also between Vau ponds, VP1, VP2, VP3, and VP4 (one-way ANOVA, F3,11=6.6, P<.01) in 2002. VAI-R3 showed a mean value significantly higher than VAI-R2 and VAI-R1, and VP4 showed a mean value significantly higher than VP1 (Tukey, P<.05).


## 3.3. Temporal Related Effect

Significant variation was observed between weeks at Gala in 2001 for abundance of Chironomidae pupae (one-way ANOVA,F2,6=9.4, P<.05). No significant variation was observed between weeks for total abundance or diversity in Gala. No significant variation was observed between weeks for macroinvertebrates in the other saltpan ponds tested for the temporal related effect, Vaia, Esteiro-Furado, and Praias-Sado (ANOVA, P>.05). ANOSIM one-way analysis did not revealed significant dissimilarities between periods (Global R=0.23), and no significant effect was observed for two-way analysis of factors Saltpan × Period (R=0.19). No significant variation was observed between weeks for abiotic variables.


## 3.4. Environment and Macroinvertebrates

Mean water depth was significantly negatively correlated with water conductivity in 2002 (Pearsonr=-0.34, P<.05). Mean water depth was significantly positively correlated with redox potential in water in 2002 (Pearson r=0.44, P<.01). Redox potential in water was significantly negatively correlated with pH in water during 2001 (Pearson r=-0.40, P<.001). Significant positive correlations were observed between water depth and total abundance and between water depth and abundance of Corixidae nymphs (Table 5). Significant negative correlation was observed between water depth and diversity (Table 5). Percentage of organic matter in sediment was significantly negatively correlated with total abundance and significantly positively correlated with diversity (Table 5). BIOENV analysis confirmed significant positive correlations between some macroinvertebrate groups and abiotic variables such as organic matter in sediments and water conductivity. Conductivity was a very important variable since it was present in almost all results. The most relevant results were observed for gastropods (r=0.96), amphipods (r=0.93), and also larvae of insects from Hydrophilidae (Berosus sp., r=0.91; Enochrus sp., r=0.93) and Dytiscidae (r=0.94).Table 5
Significant Pearson correlation coefficientsr (Pearson r,P<.05) between abiotic variables, and total abundance, diversity indices, relative abundance, and percentage of organic matter in macroinvertebrate communities.
Max_depthMean_depthSaltOM in sediments (%)Total abundancer=0.42,P<.05r=0.42,P<.05n.s.r=-0.48,P<.05Species richnessn.s.n.s.r=0.42,P<.05r=0.50,P<.01Margalef  indexn.s.n.s.n.s.r=0.60,P<.01Shannon-Wiennerr=−0.41,P<.05r=−0.57,P<.01n.s.r=0.70,P<.001Pielou’s evenessr=-0.46,P<.05r=-0.59,P<.01n.s.r=0.62,P<.01Simpson’s indexn.s.r=-0.53,P<.01n.s.r=0.63,P<.01Relative abundance (COR-N)n.s.r=0.42,P<.05n.s.n.s.OM in macroinvertebrates (%)n.s.n.s.n.s.r=0.52,P<.05Legend: Max_depth - maximum water depth (cm); Mean_depth: mean water depth (cm); Salt: salt concentration in water (%); OM: percentage of organic matter (%); COR-N: Corixidae nymph; n.s.: non significant.Higher conductivity values and the presence of Ephydridae larvae in PAS1 pond in 2001 and lower conductivity values of VP3, VP4, and VP5 ponds in 2001 were in accordance with CCA (Figure5). CCA confirmed the negative correlation between water depth and conductivity, in 2002. Higher water depth, lower conductivity and the presence of P. varians increment at VP3 pond in 2002 were also reflected in CCA. The displacement of VP4 pond relative to other ponds in CCA was in accordance with the higher percentage of organic matter in sediment observed in this pond. The presence of Ephydridae larvae, pupae and adults, and Dytiscidae and Hydrophilidae adults in Praias-Sado ponds in 2002 also seem to be in accordance with placement of these ponds together in CCA.Biplots of sampling points and explanatory variables (up) and biplots of sampling points and response variables (down) from Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) using abundances in 2001 (left) and 2002 (right). 1, 2, 3, 4: pond replicates; VP: Vau; VAI: Vaia; PAS: Passa; GAL: Gala; PS: Praias-Sado; COR: Corixidae; CHI: Chironomidae; BER:Berosussp.; ENO: Enochrus sp.; DYT: Dytiscidae; CAM: P. varians; ANF: G. subtypicus; ISO: L. rugicauda; EPHY: Ephydridae; ART: A. salina; CPH- C. insidiosum; GAS: H. ulvae; DOLI: Dolicophoridae; NOCT: Noctonectidae; CAP: C. capitata; HED: H. diversicolor; HETT: Oligochaeta n.i.; cond: water conductivity (mS cm-1); redox: Redox Potential in water (mV); depth: mean water depth (cm); Temp: water temperature (°C); OM: percentage of organic matter in surface sediment (%).


## 4. Discussion

Macroinvertebrate communities in the studied saltpans were characterized by a higher numerical dominance and a lower diversity than communities reported in several Portuguese estuaries and coastal lagoons [16]. Despite these saltpans being part of coastal environments, they provide a very particular type of environment with limiting factors for fauna like salinity [4]. Salinity gradients have been related to diversity and abundance of macroinvertebrate communities in other inland ecosystems, for example, rivers. In [17] rising salinities affected the number of species but not other diversity, eveness, or abundance values; the study found that the species composition of the community was influenced by the salinity for a small group of species, mainly crustaceans. Saltpans also differ between each other as assessed through the studied saltpans and in comparison with other studies [18, 19]. Results provided newly important information about variation of macroinvertebrate communities in saltpans under different management states, in special referring to those no longer used in salt production. A well-marked spatial heterogeneity was observed for the macroinvertebrate community between ponds within the saltpan system and also for intersltpan variation within the same wetland system, that is, Tejo estuary, as in the case of Esteiro-Furado saltpans.The most relevant variations observed for macroinvertebrate communities were observed in the analysis of three factors: pond, saltpan, and saltpan’s type. Regarding this last one, the largest differences for macroinvertebrate fauna were observed between saltpans with salt production and saltpans without salt production, which included saltpans withP. varians production and abandoned saltpans (no production). The occurrence of P. varians production in some saltpans no longer used for salt production justifies the maintenance of high water levels during almost all the year, a condition which is achieved in abandoned-closed saltpans before the dry season. This explains in part the similarity of fauna observed between saltpans with P. varians and abandoned ones. The analysis of temporal changes on macroinvertebrate communities was limited to the sampling periods occurred from March to May, including only the first part of the dry season. After this period the most part of ponds in abandoned-closed saltpans turns completely dry. Every time it occurred the aquatic diversity was lost temporally, with the exception of cysts of Artemia salina. Water inputs to abandoned saltpans depend on rainfall, run-off, and also tides in the case of abandoned-opened saltpans. The re-establishment of communities largely depended on recolonization by settlers of species existing in the surrounding saltmarsh which is influenced by marginal parts of aquatic (i.e., estuarine) and terrestrial environments as observed through the analysis of diversity. Abiotic conditions found within saltpans ponds along the time may represent limiting factors for the settlement of such a pool of species. Because the saltmarsh seems to function as a reservoir of species, it is normal that several groups are quite adapted to a changing environment regarding salt concentration and show a quite large range of tolerance to salt concentrations. Others are particularly adapted to sharp ranges of salinity, and abundances were related to conductivity. Part of species came directly from terrestrial environment like those insects having only part of life cycle in aquatic systems as larvae stages and also those seemed to tolerate rising salinities. This is interesting in the point of view of biodiversity that can complete life cycles under the effects of rising temperatures during drastic climate events.Macroinvertebrate communities in the study were numerically dominated by insect groups. Despite having a reduced body size, these groups represented high biomass peaks due to temporary high abundances describing a patchy distribution. Short-term patch dynamics was investigated for macroinvertebrate colonization on decaying detritus, and a strong linkage was found between abundance patterns and short-term variations of detritus mass [20]. The recruitment of invertebrates into a substrate depends mostly on the establishment of first settlers into the substrate, which in turn depends on substrate conditions and species biological cycles [21]. Most of them are considered opportunists as they take advantage of the disappearance of others, occupying their ecological niches during extreme conditions. These groups are well adapted to a changing environment, and they typically colonize the substrate after disturbances in the habitat. Saltpans are a good example of permanently disturbed systems due to their shallow-water columns affected by evaporation rates and water inputs; the range of disturbance is influenced by the water management.The short temporal scales that characterized variation of abiotic variables are related to inundation/evaporation cycles and contributed for a permanent state of high disturbance in macroinvertebrate communities establishing inside saltpans. Although a permanent source of disturbance is observed through changes in water depth, the extent of disturbance varied between saltpans with different levels of management. The disturbance is enlarged if water evaporation and water inputs do not compensate each other, a very common situation in abandoned saltpans. Biological cycles must have here a huge importance on the temporal variability of the community structure, since the temporal scale of 3-4 weeks per saltpan pond revealed in some cases differences in the community structure even when no significant variation occurred in abiotic variables between successive single-week periods. However it did not represent a uniformity, since significant differences occurred for abiotic variables and macroinvertebrate communities between saltpans with different levels of management. Reduction of saltpans’ management resulted in differences in the structure of communities.Abiotic conditions that were affected by saltpans’ management, like water depth, salt concentration as revealed by water conductivity, and organic matter in sediments, all were related to community structure. In managed ponds for salt production (e.g.,  Esteiro-Furado, Passa) communities were numerically dominated by insects from Ephydridae larvae stages since the water management increased salt concentration. In nonmanaged ponds (e.g.,  Vaia, Vau, Atalaia) communities were numerically dominated by insects from Chironomidae, Corixidae, or Hydrophilidae, with several life stages succeeding each other (larvae, pupae, and adult). However, in abandoned ponds the diversity was not maintained because the water column suffered quick reductions which occurred very early in the dry season. Among totally abandoned saltpan ponds, Vaia revealed the highest disturbance condition due to the influence of tides (it was permanentely opened to water from estuary) originating short-time periods between disturbance events.A very particular opportunist Polychaete,Capitella capitata, occurred here. Opportunist species are the first to settle after disturbance since they can use the habitat during the conditions not favorable for less tolerant species; they can easily adapt to new refuges left by other species thus using available food resources which enable them to produce high biomass peaks. It is the case of C. capitata which takes advantage from increasing organic loads. If conditions remain more stable, other species can recolonize because a movement of individuals can occur from the adjacent habitats. The stages of colonization phase in saltpan ponds that were most disturbed were highly dynamic but predictable according to abiotic conditions and available colonizers in the macrobenthic community, as observed in the study. Post colonization succession stages are more stable but less predictable, maybe due to intrincate biotic relations [22]. The small scale dispersion of aquatic invertebrates is usually associated to adult stages of surrounding terrestrial environment in opposition to large-scale dispersion of larvae stages [23]; the first dispersion scale seemed to be more important, in the case of nonmanaged saltpans Vau and Atalaia, which revealed abundance peaks for coleopteran larvae and adults. Diptera (e.g.,  Chironomidae) also revealed abundance peaks for larvae stages. Insect groups that have aquatic larvae and terrestrial adults provide this type of dispersion and a link between aquatic and terrestrial environments. Invertebrates with such life strategies seem to be adapted to high temporal variability for water depths and conductivity and a fragmentary spatial pattern for organic matter.As observed in the present study, drastic changes in habitat resources at short temporal scales avoid the structuring of stable communities with species of large life span and large body size. However, spatial heterogeneity in the environment can also positively influence macroinvertebrate communities in disturbed environments [21, 24]. We suggest that macroinvertebrate communities in saltpans can be understood as a combination of spatial or temporal refuges. Patchy distributions can even occur in apparently homogeneous sediment, but it is usually a result of the heterogeneity in the habitat, the presence of organisms that promote or avoid new settlers, and a well-succeeded colonization of some areas by some opportunists [25]. According to [26], species richness in transects along saltmarsh areas were not explained by area (habitat size) and it was caused by edge effects. Saltmarsh vegetation has an important role on the overall ecosystem [27]. Recolonization of flooded ponds could be influenced by edge effects related to narrow strips of water and saltmarsh vegetation. In small tidal marshes species richness could be inflated by immigration from nearby habitats, thus changing expected species-area relationship. According to [25] species richness was not altered in a predictable way by floods. That was explained by the patchy distribution and assemblage structure of macroinvertebrate communities related to habitat heterogeneity. Channel and coarse patches did not necessarily show lower species richness during the spate. Vaia pond seemed to be a good example of that, especially during 2000 when patchy distribution of C. capitata was clearly observed. C. capitata was mainly captured in parts of Vaia pond immediately after the channel of water reception. Another Polychaeta, Hediste diversicolor, was also found in those parts of Vaia pond but revealing lower abundances. Abundance Biomass Curves or the ABCmethod also used in other studies [13–15] suggested that the status of macrobenthic communities affected by disturbances could be assessed through the relation between abundance and biomass. The ABC-method confirmed that macroinvertebrate communities in saltpans were under stressful conditions, with abundance curve above the biomass curve during large part of species rank, revealing higher numerically dominance than biomass dominance, which means higher biomass diversity than numerically diversity. When the frequency of disturbance in communities is faster than its rate of recovery, conservative species are the first to be affected, while opportunistic species are benefited and they can even become the biomass dominants as well as the numerical dominants. C. capitata occurring in Vaia saltpan is a good example of that. Initially there is an increase in the diversity, but with further increase of disturbance the numbers of the less resilient opportunists start to diminish, and diversity again begins to decrease [13]. Under moderate disturbance the large competitive dominants are eliminated and the different sizes between numerical and biomass dominants are reduced thus approximating the biomass and abundance curves that can cross each other several times. This pattern was observed for Vasa-Sacos during 2000, also an abandoned saltpan. If disturbance becomes higher, then communities turn numerically dominated by few opportunist species.According to the present results, macroinvertebrate communities in saltpans seem to be influenced by organic matter and salt concentration, which in turn are affected by water inputs. Organic matter in sediments is partly influenced by water inflows and also authochtonous sources; permanently closed saltpans also revealed increments of organic matter. We can consider that species biological cycles determine the availability of settlers, but the possibility to settle in the sediment is determined by these environmental conditions.Total abundance increased with water depth, and curiously diversity increased with organic content of sediments. According to [24] macroinvertebrate diversity decreased with increasing organic loads for large organic contents in the substrate. The positive relation between macroinvertebrate diversity and organic matter in sediments as observed in the studied saltpans can result from the settlement of some particular macroinvertebrate groups and suggested that the saltpan ponds were only moderately organic polluted. This is typical of moderately polluted environments for organic matter. Organic matter can initially promote diversity through the colonization by opportunists, but diversity is reduced for increasing organic loads because only part of such opportunists remains in the sediment [13, 24].The positive relation between water depth and total abundance is very interesting and may result from the presence of moderate flooding which promoted emergence of insect larvae. The conjugation between water depth increments and moderately organic enrichment seems to contribute in a complementary way to the emergence of insect larvae and also to the settlement of aquatic groups that depend on organic content of sediments, the detritivorous. Considering that saltpans are depuration areas and receive high organic loads, such median values for percentage of organic matter in sediments can result from the fact that abandoned saltpans which stay closed to tides will dry completely in early summer. Decomposition of organic loads can also occur before the drying period, and reductive conditions resulting from oxygen depletion in the water can also contribute to the reduction of the number of species establishing there and to the limitation of first stages numerically dominated. Water depth variation results from instable balance between water inputs and evaporation, and it can affect salt concentration as observed in 2002; negative correlation was observed between water depth and conductivity. The fact that most saltpans keep median salt concentration values can have different causes, for example,the flooding regime and evaporation rates, but the presence of water management could compensate others. Water depth was positively correlated with total abundance and negatively correlated with diversity and that may indicate that water inflow in the present saltpans contributes to the abundance of some particular groups. That seemed to be the case of Corixidae nymphs, since abundance was positively correlated with water depth. Several factors can modify locally the pattern for communities establishing after flooding, for example, the influence of saltmarsh edges and refuges on patchy distribution. According to [26] migration from adjacent areas and refuges is important. Communities after flooding can be very difficult to preview also because heterogeneity of habitat [25].Chironomidae was the most constant group along all saltpans. Chironomids reveal a preference for shallow waters in estuarine or lagoon systems and has been referred as increasing immediately after moderate flooding [28, 29], but severe flooding seemed to be not much tolerated by these and other insect larvae [30]. Chironomidae larvae were observed in a higher number of replicates than other groups, including those in ponds with regular flooding (e.g.,  Vaia, Vau-Poente). Corixidae also seem not inhibited by flooding and instead it seems to benefit from re-establishment of water depth, as its abundance was positively correlated with water depth. Flooding usually represents nutrient enrichment and high primary production and that represents a food source for grazers. Associated high organic enrichment and microbial activity represent food source for detritivorous. Chironomids can be predators or detritivorous. Corixidae are scavengers or grazers. The coexistence of species in benthic communities of small lentic systems with low water columns seems to be ensured by tolerance to physical gradients and also by resource partitioning for food and space. According to [31] the confined niche potentiality results in a different spatial/temporal utilization of habitat resources by each species. This explains species coexistence in small and confined lentic systems like saltpan ponds, since they minimize interaction by temporal avoidance of each other, as observed in the study through abundance peaks of different species for different short temporal periods. The presence of water management clearly benefited the coexistence of a wide range of taxonomic groups, and it was possible due to the potential of resource partitioning.



---

*Source: 629310-2009-10-21.xml*