# Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer with Shredded Fibers: Quasi-Isotropic Material Properties and Antenna Performance

Authors: Gerald Artner; Philipp K. Gentner; Johann Nicolics; Christoph F. Mecklenbräuker
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

A carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) laminate, with the top layer consisting of shredded fibers, is proposed and manufactured. The shredded fibers are aligned randomly on the surface to achieve a more isotropic conductivity, as is desired in antenna applications. Moreover, fiber shreds can be recycled from carbon fiber composites. Conductivity, permittivity, and permeability are obtained with the Nicolson-Ross-Weir method from material samples measured inside rectangular waveguides in the frequency range of 4 to 6 GHz. The decrease in material anisotropy results in negligible influence on antennas. This is shown by measuring the proposed CFRP as ground plane material for both a narrowband wire monopole antenna for 5.9 GHz and an ultrawideband conical monopole antenna for 1–10 GHz. For comparison, all measurements are repeated with a twill-weave CFRP.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Composites are materials consisting of a mixture of components present as separate phases. They are created for engineering applications to combine the desired qualities of its individual components. Carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP) are carbon fiber composites (CFC) consisting of carbon fibers embedded in a polymer matrix, typically a resin. The most common production technique is to build CFRP as laminates. These laminates are stacked from unidirectional or woven carbon fiber plies preimpregnated with resin, which are commonly referred to as prepreg. The laminate is stacked in a mold to form the desired part geometry, vacuum-bagged, and cured in an autoclave.The motivation to use CFRP is found in their mechanical properties. While Young’s modulusE of CFRP is lower than that of many metals, the density of CFRP is much lower. Young’s modulus per material density of CFRP is much higher than that of metals; for example, the specific tensile modulus of steel is about 26GPa/(g/cm3), while for unidirectional CFRP (UD-CFRP) values >100GPa/(g/cm3) can be easily achieved in fiber direction. This makes CFRP a suitable material for lightweight construction.Carbon fibers are electric conductors, while the matrix is almost exclusively nonconductive. The electromagnetic properties of CFRP laminates are in general anisotropic and depend on fiber and matrix materials, ply weave, orientation of the layers in the laminate, and frequency. In the past, due to their application in avionics and aeronautics, the research focus was on the electromagnetic shielding properties of carbon fiber composites [1, 2]. For antenna design the electrical conductivity, permittivity, and magnetic permeability of the materials in the vicinity of the antenna are of interest.Measurements of radio-frequency electromagnetic properties are performed by inserting a material sample (material under test, MUT) inside a well understood system, such as a waveguide [3, 4] and coaxial cable, or between horn antennas [5]. The electrical conductivity and permittivity transverse and parallel to UD-CFRP and with different fiber volume fractions were measured with waveguides in [6]; values are given in a large frequency range up to 10GHz. The conductivity of CFRP is much higher than that of carbon-black or graphite particulate composites [7]; conductivity of UD-CFRP in and perpendicular to fiber direction differs by a factor of 105. Horn antenna measurements have shown that the conductivity of CFC with unidirectional fibers increases with frequency if the electrical field is perpendicular to the fibers but is flat with the field parallel to the fiber direction [8]. Waveguide measurements of electrical conductivity and permittivity with the Nicolson-Ross-Weir (NRW) method and different ply orientation in the range of 8GHz to 12GHz have been conducted in [9], where they also provide measurements of CFRP slot antennas. CFRP are diamagnetic; the magnetic permeability of unidirectional carbon fiber polymer laminates was measured with horn antennas and waveguides in [10]. In most investigations only CFRP made with unidirectional fiber direction, and plies which are all oriented in the same direction, are considered. UD-CFRP are more interesting from a theoretical viewpoint as the material anisotropy is more pronounced and the material is easier to model. In applications however, woven fabrics are often used to compensate the smallE-module and/or low electric conductivity perpendicular to fiber direction.Modeling approaches for the electrical properties of CFC have been proposed in [11, 12] in addition to simple law of mixture models used in [1, 13].CFRP are used in a variety of antenna applications. The whole antenna can be built from CFRP. Measurements of braided CFRP patch antennas are compared to law of mixture and geometry based simulations in [14]. The performance of bow-tie antennas with unidirectional and braided CFRP is measured in [15]. Various monopole antennas made from CFRP and carbon nanotubes are investigated in [16, 17]. Slotted waveguide antennas manufactured from CFRP are investigated in [18]. This type of antenna is especially relevant in aeronautical applications. Load bearing structures are formed from CFRP and the geometry obtained for mechanical stability is close to the geometry of rectangular waveguides. CFRP bearers can be used as rectangular waveguides and slots can be cut into them to build rectangular waveguide antennas [19]. Several elements can be combined into an antenna array, the slotted waveguide antenna stiffened structure [20].CFRP are used for lightweight construction of reflectors, mostly in large parabolic dishes [21] or space applications [22]. Measurements in [23] show that CFRP is applicable as reflector material for millimeter-wave antennas at 100GHz. Antenna gain with a reflector made from woven CFRP is close to the gain with a chrome plated reflector. It should be noted that CFRP cannot be used in some antenna applications as they are a source of intermodulation products [24].CFRP are used as antenna ground plane material. In specialized applications the high anisotropy of UD-CFRP can be utilized. A mechanically reconfigurable antenna with an anisotropic CFRP ground plane is presented in [25]. Surface currents on the ground plane can flow in fiber direction, while they are blocked perpendicular to fiber direction due to the low conductivity of CFRP. This mechanism acts as a mode filter for a patch antenna which is rotated against the CFRP ground plane. In general, however, the conductivity of the antenna ground plane should be isotropic.A typical use case as ground plane is when antennas are mounted on large CFRP structures such as an aircraft fuselage or a car chassis. The influence of the ground plane material on the antennas should be small to allow antenna design independent of composite design. To achieve this, CFRP with near anisotropic conductivity are preferred, such that electric currents are not obstructed. This is especially the case in automotive antenna design, where antenna modules are used on different types of vehicle and are required to function on the CFRP roof of electric cars as well as on steel roofs. An automotive roof mounted antenna module (shark-fin) is measured on a CFRP car roof in [26]. An antenna cavity for integration into CFRP sheets, such as aircraft skin panels or car chassis, is proposed and prototyped in [27]. In vehicular applications the antenna cavity can be manufactured as part of a carbon fiber reinforced car roof as is described in [28].A CFRP material with carbon fiber shreds in random alignment as its top layer is proposed for antenna applications and manufactured. Fiber shreds can be obtained from recycled CFRP, resulting in a sustainable material. Due to the skin effect, it is sufficient to design the top layer of the laminate for antenna applications in the gigahertz range; the other plies can be chosen independently to meet the mechanical requirements of the composite. The material is described in Section2. Its electromagnetic properties are measured with the NRW method in a rectangular waveguide and compared to a CFRP with a 2/2 twill weave in Section 3.1. Material measurements are performed in the frequency band from 4GHz to 6GHz, which includes the frequency band from 5.85GHz to 5.925GHz, that is reserved for dedicated short range communication (DSRC) in intelligent transportation systems (ITS), IEEE 802.11p. The influence of the proposed CFRP as ground plane material is measured with several monopole antennas in Section 4. The proposed CFRP is measured as ground plane for a wire monopole antenna for the 5.9GHz DSRC band and with broadband conical monopole antennas in a frequency range from 1GHz to 10GHz.


## 2. CFRP for Antenna Applications

In general, the influence of a CFRP ground plane on the antenna should be small. For antenna applications CFC are preferred over graphite or carbon-black particulate composites due to their larger conductivity in fiber direction [7]. Woven carbon fiber plies are used to achieve a more isotropic conductivity than unidirectional plies [8]. However, the geometry of a chosen weave might result in unwanted resonances. A straightforward method to diminish the anisotropic conductivity of CFRP is to superimpose an isotropic metallic layer onto the CFRP, include it in the laminate during production, or metalize the CFRP surface. In many applications this is not possible because of the different thermal expansion coefficients of the materials or simply because of too high costs.It is proposed to use a CFRP with fiber shreds in random alignment in antenna applications. Random fiber alignment results in a composite with a more isotropic conductivity than UD-CFRP and does not have characteristic geometries associated with woven carbon plies. The quasi-random fiber alignment is easy in production, as the fiber shreds can be dropped or blown onto the mold or laminate. Fiber shreds can be obtained from CFRP recycling processes [29]. Due to the skin effect it is sufficient to design the top layer of the laminate for antenna applications; the remaining plies can be designed to meet mechanical requirements.A microscopic photograph of a material sample taken from a CFRP with unidirectional plies and fiber shreds in random alignment on top is depicted in Figure1(a). The unidirectional filaments under the fiber shreds are visible as horizontal lines in the photograph. In production the fiber shreds are of course not aligned completely random; an example is depicted on the top border of Figure 1(a), where a bundle of carbon fiber shreds is aligned facing downwards. The shred-CFRP has a total thickness of 2.26mm. The material is compared to a 2/2 twill-weave CFRP depicted in Figure 1(b). The twill-CFRP has a thickness of 0.9mm, consists of 5 layers of 2/2 twill weave stacked as [45 90 45 90 45], and has 1000 fiber filaments per roving.Figure 1
Microscopic photographs of (a) the proposed CFRP with fiber shreds in random alignment on top and (b) the twill-weave CFRP reference material. The unidirectional filaments are visible underneath the fiber shreds as horizontal lines.
(a)
(b)


## 3. Material Measurements

### 3.1. NRW Method

The electromagnetic properties (conductivity, permittivity, and permeability) of the proposed CFRP with fiber snippets on top are measured at radio frequencies. Results are compared to measurements of a CFRP with a twill weave as described in Section2. Values for UD-CFRP are already well known in literature. A method developed by Nicolson-Ross-Weir (NRW) [30, 31] enables the characterization of material samples inside a waveguide by calculating the electrical characteristics from measured scattering parameters (S-parameters). Rectangular material samples are cut from the CFRP and placed in a fixture inside a rectangular waveguide that operates in its dominant TE10 mode. The waveguide is connected to a vector network analyzer andS-parameters are measured. The NRW method is then used to calculate the electrical and magnetic material parameters from theS-parameters obtained by waveguide measurements. The formulas forS-parameter conversion, where the complex material parameters ϵr, μr and the conductivity σ are extracted, can be found in [5, 32]. The position of the MUT inside the fixture is considered according to [32], where L1 and L2 are the distance from the MUT to the calibration plane of port 1 and port 2 inside the waveguide, respectively:(1)Ri=e-γ0Li,i∈1,2,S11C=S11R12,S21C=S21R1R2.The scattering parameters S11C and S21C are the basis for the Nicolson-Ross-Weir (NRW) equations:(2)Γ=X±X2-1,(3)X=S11C2-S21C2+12S11C,(4)1Λ2=-12πdln⁡1P2,(5)P=S11C+S21C-Γ1-S11C+S21CΓ,with the thickness of the MUT d and propagation factor P and with the sign in (2) to be chosen such that the reflection coefficient is |Γ|≤1. Re⁡{1/Λ}=1/λg with the transmission line guide wavelength λg. Note that the logarithm in (4) is ambiguous by 2πn, n∈N0, as P is complex in general. The ambiguity problem is resolved by choosingthin samples of thickness d<λ/2 [32], resulting in n=0. This is the case for the presented CFRP measurements in the low gigahertz range, as these composites are commonly manufactured as (thin) laminates. To check whether the n=0 assumption is valid, the method based on group delay from [31] was also implemented. For this method the group delay is calculated for each frequency as τgn and compared to the group delay τg, which is based on the slope of the propagation factor P(6)τgn=d·ddfϵrμrλ02-1λc2n1/2,τg=12πd-ϕdf,with ϕ=arg⁡(P). The derivatives in (6) are approximated by finite differences between measured frequency bins. The correct root n=k is then chosen such that τgk-τg≈0. The group delay method also resulted in n=0 in the frequency band of the fundamental mode of the waveguide.The complex magnetic permeability and electric permittivity are then obtained as(7)μr=μr′-jμr′′=1+ΓΛ1-Γ1/λ02-1/λc2,ϵr=ϵr′-jϵr′′=λ02μr1λc2+1Λ2.In (7) λ0 denotes the wavelength in free space at measurement frequency and λc the cut-off frequency of the waveguide.The surface conductivity of the material is derived from(8)σ=4πμ0f1-S1122Z021+S112--S114+6S112-12,with the magnetic constant μ0, frequency f, and the free space impedance Z0; see [9].


### 3.2. Measurement Setup

The waveguide WR187 has a dimension ofa=47.5mm×b=22.1mm. The cut-off frequency of the TE10 mode is fc=c0/2a≈3.16 GHz and the nominal frequency range is 3.94–5.99 GHz.Samples are cut from the CFRP materials for a selected set of discrete orientations and grinded to fit into a waveguide fixture. The waveguide was cleaned with alcohol and calibrated using a through-reflect-match (TRM) calibration. The fixture with the sample is then fastened in the middle of the waveguide, theS-parameters are measured with a network analyzer (R&S ZVA24), and the electrical properties are calculated in a Matlab script as presented in Section 3.1. The disassembled measurement setup is depicted in Figure 2.Figure 2
Measurement setup consisting of WR187 waveguides, sample fixture, and R&S ZVA24 network analyzer.To measure the angular dependency of the materials, the samples are cut in various orientationsφ. Twill-CFRP sample orientations range from 0∘ to 90∘ in steps of 10∘ and shred-CFRP samples are cut from 0∘ to 110∘ in 5∘ steps, where φ is the deviation from an arbitrary defined direction on the material surface. Three additional samples with φ=0∘ are cut from different positions of shred-CFRP to assess the impact of cutting precision and material inhomogeneity.There are several known sources of inaccuracies when measuring material samples inside a waveguide. The sample might be displaced inadvertently from the calibration plane. It may tilt and, due to imprecise manufacturing, air-gaps might appear between sample and the waveguide walls. To mitigate these sources of inaccuracies, a small piece of styrofoam is clamped between sample and fixture when necessary, as shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Attachment of a sample with air-gap in the waveguide fixture by clamping a piece of styrofoam into the air-gap, on the example of a twill-CFRP sample with an alignment of60∘.


### 3.3. Measurement Results

Results for the permittivity, permeability, and conductivity of shred-CFRP are presented in Figures4(a), 5(a), and 6(a), respectively and results for twill-CFRP are depicted in Figures 4(b), 5(b), and 6(b), respectively. The orientation dependent results are shown for 4 GHz, 5 GHz, and 5.9GHz (ITS G5). Measured values for different sample orientations are connected by straight lines only for visual guidance.Figure 4
Permittivity of (a) shred-CFRP and (b) twill-CFRP dependent on the orientation of the cut sample.
(a)
Permittivity, shred-CFRP
(b)
Permittivity, twill-CFRPFigure 5
Permeability of (a) shred-CFRP and (b) twill-CFRP dependent on the orientation of the cut sample.
(a)
Permeability, shred-CFRP
(b)
Permeability, twill-CFRPFigure 6
Conductivity of (a) shred-CFRP and (b) twill-CFRP dependent on the orientation of the cut sample.
(a)
Conductivity, shred-CFRP
(b)
Conductivity, twill-CFRPThe permittivity of the two CFRP is high when compared to [6], where ϵr for unidirectional fibers in epoxy was around 1 for electrical field parallel to fiber alignment and ranged from 5 to 20 for transverse fields, and [9], where ϵr was approximately 30 for both unidirectional and [0 45 90 −45] fiber alignment.Twill-CFRP shows strong dependency ofμr on the angle, while all measured shred-CFRP samples have low μr independent of their alignment. The diamagnetic behavior of CFRP (Figure 5) is in accordance with [10], where the real part of μr varies between 0 and 1 dependent on orientation of a UD-CFRP.The conductivity anisotropy of the shred-CFRP (and the twill-CFRP) is significantly lower than that of UD-CFRP. The conductivity of shred-CFRP is about 104 S/m. Conductivity varies by a factor of 10 depending on the angle for a given frequency. Reference [7] reports a factor of 105 between conductivity in fiber direction (≈102 S/cm) and that perpendicular to fiber direction (≈10−3 S/cm). Reference [6] reports a longitudinal conductivity of ≈400S/cm with a sharp decline towards zero between 108 Hz and 1010 Hz and transverse conductivity around 10-2 S/cm. For a CFRP with unidirectional plies that are stacked as [0 45 90 −45]2s conductivity varies between 5000 S/m (parallel) and 1000 S/cm (perpendicular) [9] (8–12GHz). The conductivity of the shred-CFRP is slightly higher than that of the twill-CFRP.Note that the NRW estimates allow slightly negative values for the magnetic permeability, although such negative values are not compatible with passivity of the material. These stem from measurement inaccuracies together with the numerical sensitivity of the NRW method which does not enforce passivity of the material. Negative parameter estimates become apparent when the permeability is close to zero, as depicted in Figure5(a). The ϵr′ value of the 0∘b shred-CFRP sample in Figure 4(a) and μr′′ of the 30∘ twill-CFRP sample in Figure 5(b) serve as indicators for the overall accuracy of the parameter estimates.To investigate the homogeneity of the shred-CFRP, four samples with the same orientation were cut from different regions of the material. They are referred to as0a∘, 0b∘, 0c∘, and 0d∘. The conductivity measurements of these four samples dependent on frequency are depicted in Figure 7. Although the four samples in Figure 7 have the same orientation, their frequency behavior is different. The conductivity of samples 0a∘ and 0c∘ increases with increasing frequency, the conductivity of sample 0b∘ decreases with frequency, and the conductivity of sample 0d∘ stays approximately the same over the investigated frequency range. Additionally, the spread of values for the 0∘ samples resembles the value range of the other samples in Figures 4(a), 5(a), and 6(a). The conclusion must be that the material is either inhomogeneous or that the measurements are not accurate enough to measure an angular dependency of the radio-frequency properties of the proposed CFRP. The microscopic photograph depicted in Figure 1(a) suggests that the proposed CFRP is not homogenous, as fibers were not uniformly distributed during production and strands of fibers with same alignment are still present on the surface. However, it is shown in Section 4 that the local inhomogeneity and anisotropy of the CFRP ground plane with fiber shreds have no relevant influence on monopole antennas.Figure 7
Conductivity of four shred-CFRP samples with the same alignment (0∘), cut from different positions of the material.At5.9GHz the fiber shreds of shred-CFRP lead to a smaller spread of conductivity values than a woven structure like that of twill-CFRP. The conductivity of shred-CFRP varies only between 104 S/m and 8·104 S/m at 5.9 GHz. When building monopole antennas with a shred-CFRP ground plane, this change leads to a negligible influence on antenna radiation patterns as presented in Section 4.1. Broadband measurements of conical monopole antennas in Section 4.2 show that shred-CFRP is an excellent ground plane material with results close to aluminum.


## 3.1. NRW Method

The electromagnetic properties (conductivity, permittivity, and permeability) of the proposed CFRP with fiber snippets on top are measured at radio frequencies. Results are compared to measurements of a CFRP with a twill weave as described in Section2. Values for UD-CFRP are already well known in literature. A method developed by Nicolson-Ross-Weir (NRW) [30, 31] enables the characterization of material samples inside a waveguide by calculating the electrical characteristics from measured scattering parameters (S-parameters). Rectangular material samples are cut from the CFRP and placed in a fixture inside a rectangular waveguide that operates in its dominant TE10 mode. The waveguide is connected to a vector network analyzer andS-parameters are measured. The NRW method is then used to calculate the electrical and magnetic material parameters from theS-parameters obtained by waveguide measurements. The formulas forS-parameter conversion, where the complex material parameters ϵr, μr and the conductivity σ are extracted, can be found in [5, 32]. The position of the MUT inside the fixture is considered according to [32], where L1 and L2 are the distance from the MUT to the calibration plane of port 1 and port 2 inside the waveguide, respectively:(1)Ri=e-γ0Li,i∈1,2,S11C=S11R12,S21C=S21R1R2.The scattering parameters S11C and S21C are the basis for the Nicolson-Ross-Weir (NRW) equations:(2)Γ=X±X2-1,(3)X=S11C2-S21C2+12S11C,(4)1Λ2=-12πdln⁡1P2,(5)P=S11C+S21C-Γ1-S11C+S21CΓ,with the thickness of the MUT d and propagation factor P and with the sign in (2) to be chosen such that the reflection coefficient is |Γ|≤1. Re⁡{1/Λ}=1/λg with the transmission line guide wavelength λg. Note that the logarithm in (4) is ambiguous by 2πn, n∈N0, as P is complex in general. The ambiguity problem is resolved by choosingthin samples of thickness d<λ/2 [32], resulting in n=0. This is the case for the presented CFRP measurements in the low gigahertz range, as these composites are commonly manufactured as (thin) laminates. To check whether the n=0 assumption is valid, the method based on group delay from [31] was also implemented. For this method the group delay is calculated for each frequency as τgn and compared to the group delay τg, which is based on the slope of the propagation factor P(6)τgn=d·ddfϵrμrλ02-1λc2n1/2,τg=12πd-ϕdf,with ϕ=arg⁡(P). The derivatives in (6) are approximated by finite differences between measured frequency bins. The correct root n=k is then chosen such that τgk-τg≈0. The group delay method also resulted in n=0 in the frequency band of the fundamental mode of the waveguide.The complex magnetic permeability and electric permittivity are then obtained as(7)μr=μr′-jμr′′=1+ΓΛ1-Γ1/λ02-1/λc2,ϵr=ϵr′-jϵr′′=λ02μr1λc2+1Λ2.In (7) λ0 denotes the wavelength in free space at measurement frequency and λc the cut-off frequency of the waveguide.The surface conductivity of the material is derived from(8)σ=4πμ0f1-S1122Z021+S112--S114+6S112-12,with the magnetic constant μ0, frequency f, and the free space impedance Z0; see [9].


## 3.2. Measurement Setup

The waveguide WR187 has a dimension ofa=47.5mm×b=22.1mm. The cut-off frequency of the TE10 mode is fc=c0/2a≈3.16 GHz and the nominal frequency range is 3.94–5.99 GHz.Samples are cut from the CFRP materials for a selected set of discrete orientations and grinded to fit into a waveguide fixture. The waveguide was cleaned with alcohol and calibrated using a through-reflect-match (TRM) calibration. The fixture with the sample is then fastened in the middle of the waveguide, theS-parameters are measured with a network analyzer (R&S ZVA24), and the electrical properties are calculated in a Matlab script as presented in Section 3.1. The disassembled measurement setup is depicted in Figure 2.Figure 2
Measurement setup consisting of WR187 waveguides, sample fixture, and R&S ZVA24 network analyzer.To measure the angular dependency of the materials, the samples are cut in various orientationsφ. Twill-CFRP sample orientations range from 0∘ to 90∘ in steps of 10∘ and shred-CFRP samples are cut from 0∘ to 110∘ in 5∘ steps, where φ is the deviation from an arbitrary defined direction on the material surface. Three additional samples with φ=0∘ are cut from different positions of shred-CFRP to assess the impact of cutting precision and material inhomogeneity.There are several known sources of inaccuracies when measuring material samples inside a waveguide. The sample might be displaced inadvertently from the calibration plane. It may tilt and, due to imprecise manufacturing, air-gaps might appear between sample and the waveguide walls. To mitigate these sources of inaccuracies, a small piece of styrofoam is clamped between sample and fixture when necessary, as shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Attachment of a sample with air-gap in the waveguide fixture by clamping a piece of styrofoam into the air-gap, on the example of a twill-CFRP sample with an alignment of60∘.


## 3.3. Measurement Results

Results for the permittivity, permeability, and conductivity of shred-CFRP are presented in Figures4(a), 5(a), and 6(a), respectively and results for twill-CFRP are depicted in Figures 4(b), 5(b), and 6(b), respectively. The orientation dependent results are shown for 4 GHz, 5 GHz, and 5.9GHz (ITS G5). Measured values for different sample orientations are connected by straight lines only for visual guidance.Figure 4
Permittivity of (a) shred-CFRP and (b) twill-CFRP dependent on the orientation of the cut sample.
(a)
Permittivity, shred-CFRP
(b)
Permittivity, twill-CFRPFigure 5
Permeability of (a) shred-CFRP and (b) twill-CFRP dependent on the orientation of the cut sample.
(a)
Permeability, shred-CFRP
(b)
Permeability, twill-CFRPFigure 6
Conductivity of (a) shred-CFRP and (b) twill-CFRP dependent on the orientation of the cut sample.
(a)
Conductivity, shred-CFRP
(b)
Conductivity, twill-CFRPThe permittivity of the two CFRP is high when compared to [6], where ϵr for unidirectional fibers in epoxy was around 1 for electrical field parallel to fiber alignment and ranged from 5 to 20 for transverse fields, and [9], where ϵr was approximately 30 for both unidirectional and [0 45 90 −45] fiber alignment.Twill-CFRP shows strong dependency ofμr on the angle, while all measured shred-CFRP samples have low μr independent of their alignment. The diamagnetic behavior of CFRP (Figure 5) is in accordance with [10], where the real part of μr varies between 0 and 1 dependent on orientation of a UD-CFRP.The conductivity anisotropy of the shred-CFRP (and the twill-CFRP) is significantly lower than that of UD-CFRP. The conductivity of shred-CFRP is about 104 S/m. Conductivity varies by a factor of 10 depending on the angle for a given frequency. Reference [7] reports a factor of 105 between conductivity in fiber direction (≈102 S/cm) and that perpendicular to fiber direction (≈10−3 S/cm). Reference [6] reports a longitudinal conductivity of ≈400S/cm with a sharp decline towards zero between 108 Hz and 1010 Hz and transverse conductivity around 10-2 S/cm. For a CFRP with unidirectional plies that are stacked as [0 45 90 −45]2s conductivity varies between 5000 S/m (parallel) and 1000 S/cm (perpendicular) [9] (8–12GHz). The conductivity of the shred-CFRP is slightly higher than that of the twill-CFRP.Note that the NRW estimates allow slightly negative values for the magnetic permeability, although such negative values are not compatible with passivity of the material. These stem from measurement inaccuracies together with the numerical sensitivity of the NRW method which does not enforce passivity of the material. Negative parameter estimates become apparent when the permeability is close to zero, as depicted in Figure5(a). The ϵr′ value of the 0∘b shred-CFRP sample in Figure 4(a) and μr′′ of the 30∘ twill-CFRP sample in Figure 5(b) serve as indicators for the overall accuracy of the parameter estimates.To investigate the homogeneity of the shred-CFRP, four samples with the same orientation were cut from different regions of the material. They are referred to as0a∘, 0b∘, 0c∘, and 0d∘. The conductivity measurements of these four samples dependent on frequency are depicted in Figure 7. Although the four samples in Figure 7 have the same orientation, their frequency behavior is different. The conductivity of samples 0a∘ and 0c∘ increases with increasing frequency, the conductivity of sample 0b∘ decreases with frequency, and the conductivity of sample 0d∘ stays approximately the same over the investigated frequency range. Additionally, the spread of values for the 0∘ samples resembles the value range of the other samples in Figures 4(a), 5(a), and 6(a). The conclusion must be that the material is either inhomogeneous or that the measurements are not accurate enough to measure an angular dependency of the radio-frequency properties of the proposed CFRP. The microscopic photograph depicted in Figure 1(a) suggests that the proposed CFRP is not homogenous, as fibers were not uniformly distributed during production and strands of fibers with same alignment are still present on the surface. However, it is shown in Section 4 that the local inhomogeneity and anisotropy of the CFRP ground plane with fiber shreds have no relevant influence on monopole antennas.Figure 7
Conductivity of four shred-CFRP samples with the same alignment (0∘), cut from different positions of the material.At5.9GHz the fiber shreds of shred-CFRP lead to a smaller spread of conductivity values than a woven structure like that of twill-CFRP. The conductivity of shred-CFRP varies only between 104 S/m and 8·104 S/m at 5.9 GHz. When building monopole antennas with a shred-CFRP ground plane, this change leads to a negligible influence on antenna radiation patterns as presented in Section 4.1. Broadband measurements of conical monopole antennas in Section 4.2 show that shred-CFRP is an excellent ground plane material with results close to aluminum.


## 4. Antennas with CFRP Ground Planes

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, the first measurement of the influence of CFRP as a ground plane material of a monopole antenna was performed in [33] for 1 GHz. The influence of the composite anisotropy was undetectable within the measurement accuracy. However, no detailed description of the investigated CFRP was given. Monopole antennas are investigated, because they are well known antennas and are already used in various applications where large CFRP ground planes are available. Performance of shred-CFRP is expected to be similar for other antenna types.


### 4.1. Wire Monopole Antenna for 5.9 GHz

A wire monopole antenna for DSRC at5.9 GHz is measured on CFRP ground planes [34]. The monopole antenna is a metal wire cut to a length of about λ/4 such that it is resonant at 5.9 GHz. The wire is soldered to the inner connector of a subminiature version A (SMA) flange, which is screwed to threaded holes in the ground plane. The wire monopole antenna is measured on circular ground planes with 195 mm diameters. The wire monopole antenna on a circular ground plane from shred-CFRP is depicted in Figure 8. The shred-CFRP and twill-CFRP are the same as in Section 3.Figure 8
Monopole antenna for 5.9 GHz on a circular shred-CFRP ground plane.To measure the influence of a CFRP ground plane on a narrowband antenna, the monopole wire is trimmed such that it is resonant at5.9 GHz on an aluminum ground plane. The measuredS-parameters are depicted in Figure 9. The resonance frequency of the antenna is shifted to about 5.4 GHz when placed on the twill-CFRP. The length of the wire was not adjusted, as the return loss at 5.9 GHz is still better than 10 dB. In a practical application the dimensions will be adjusted, such that the antenna is resonant at the desired frequency.Figure 9
MeasuredS-parameters of the wire monopole antennas on different ground planes (reprinted with permission from [34]; ©2014 IEEE).Gain pattern measurements are performed inside the institute’s anechoic chamber. The vertical cuts of the gain patterns at azimuthφ=0∘ are shown in Figure 10. The horizontal cuts of the measured gain patterns are depicted in Figure 11. The patterns are normalized. Vertical cuts of the patterns show no significant deviation; no additional zeros or notches are introduced by the shred-CFRP. The influence of the shred-CFRP on the antenna’s radiation pattern in the horizontal plane is smaller than 1 dB and can be neglected in most applications. Radiation efficiency on the shred-CFRP ground plane is reduced by 23% (1.14 dB) compared to the efficiency on an aluminum ground plane in [34].Figure 10
Monopole antenna for5.9 GHz on a circular ground plane. Vertical cut of the normalized measured gain pattern for azimuth φ=0∘ (reprinted with permission from [34]; ©2014 IEEE).Figure 11
Monopole antenna for5.9 GHz on a circular ground plane. Horizontal cut of the normalized measured gain pattern for polar angel θ=90∘ (reprinted with permission from [34]; ©2014 IEEE).


### 4.2. Conical Monopole Antenna on CFRP Ground Planes

Conical monopole antennas turned from brass are used to measure the influence of CFRP as ground plane material on antennas from1 GHz to 10 GHz [35]. Cone dimensions are depicted in Figure 12. The cones have cylindrical stubs at the tip that fit tightly over the inner conductor of a coaxial SMA flange. As the ground planes have different thickness, several cones are manufactured with different lengths of the stubs, such that the tip of the cone is always positioned at the surface level of the material. The SMA flanges are screwed to threaded holes drilled into the ground planes. The antennas are measured on circular ground planes manufactured from shred-CFRP, twill-weave CFRP, UD-CFRP, and aluminum. All ground planes have a diameter of 300 mm. As threading the thin twill-CFRP ground plane in Section 4.1 was challenging, a thicker twill-CFRP was used as reference material for the measurements of the conical monopole antennas. The twill-CFRP is a 1.6 mm thick 2/2 twill weave stacked as [090] that is commercially available from CG-TEC and has a fiber volume fraction of 63% according to manufacturer.Figure 12
Cone dimensions of the broadband monopole antenna. The cylindrical stub on the bottom (red) is designed to fit over the inner conductor of an SMA flange, its length is adjusted to the thickness of the ground plane. All dimensions are in millimeter (reprinted with permission from [35]; ©2017 IEEE).MeasuredS-parameters are depicted in Figure 13. Return loss is better than 10 dB between 2 GHz and 10 GHz for all ground plane materials. The return loss with the UD-CFRP is a bit reduced but still better than 10 dB.Figure 13
MeasuredS-parameters of the conical monopole antenna on different ground plane materials (reprinted with permission from [35]; ©2017 IEEE).Gain patterns are again measured in the institute’s anechoic chamber (Figure14). Gain patterns presented in this section are not normalized and are given according to the IEEE gain definition based on accepted power, in order to emphasize the large influence of UD-CFRP in comparison to the shred-CFRP and twill-CFRP. Vertical cuts of the measured gain patterns are depicted in Figure 15. Cuts for azimuthal angle φ=0∘ and φ=90∘ are shown on the left and right side, respectively. For the UD-CFRP φ=0∘ corresponds with fiber direction and φ=90∘ is perpendicular to fiber direction. The CFRP with fiber shreds and the twill-weave CFRP perform similar to aluminum in the whole frequency range. With the UD-CFRP antenna gain in fiber direction (φ=0∘) is 1–4 dB lower than on aluminum. The shape of the gain pattern in fiber direction remains widely unchanged, but radiation perpendicular to fiber direction is greatly diminished for the UD-CFRP and the gain pattern is changed, especially for radiation in the horizontal plane θ≈90∘. For the conical monopole antenna radiation efficiency on shred-CFRP is measured close to that of aluminum in the frequency range from 1 GHz to 10 GHz, about 0.5 dB lower at 5.9 GHz [35].Figure 14
Conical monopole antenna on the shred-CFRP ground plane. The antenna is placed on a Rohacell column on an azimuth rotary stage inside the university’s anechoic chamber.Figure 15
Vertical cuts of the gain patterns. Cuts for azimuthal angleφ=0∘ and φ=90∘ are shown on the left and right side, respectively (reprinted with permission from [35]; ©2017 IEEE).
(a)
2 GHz
(b)
5 GHz
(c)
10 GHzThe measurements show that using a UD-CFRP has a huge influence on antennas. The anisotropic conductivity of UD-CFRP obstructs surface currents on the ground plane leading to reduced gain and changed radiation pattern perpendicular to fiber direction. Although the anisotropy may be useful [25], a good isotropic conductor is most desirable as antenna ground plane material. This issue is crucial in the automotive industry, where DSRC was recently introduced for safety relevant vehicle-to-vehicle communication. For electric car construction with a lightweight CFRP chassis, the materials should be chosen such that they do not impair antenna performance. The presented measurements show that this is achievable by placing either randomly oriented fiber shreds or woven fibers on top of any CFRP laminate. The electric currents are confined to the top most layer of the composite due to the skin effect. It is therefore feasible to only manufacture the top CFRP layer according to antenna considerations, whereas the remaining plies are designed to meet the mechanical requirements.The antenna performance differences between shred-CFRP, twill-CFRP, and aluminum in the investigated frequency range are negligible in most antenna applications. The conductivity of the CFRP with the shredded fibers seems to be even somewhat more isotropic than the conductivity of the twill-CFRP. Using recycled and shredded carbon fibers is desirable from an antenna viewpoint.


## 4.1. Wire Monopole Antenna for 5.9 GHz

A wire monopole antenna for DSRC at5.9 GHz is measured on CFRP ground planes [34]. The monopole antenna is a metal wire cut to a length of about λ/4 such that it is resonant at 5.9 GHz. The wire is soldered to the inner connector of a subminiature version A (SMA) flange, which is screwed to threaded holes in the ground plane. The wire monopole antenna is measured on circular ground planes with 195 mm diameters. The wire monopole antenna on a circular ground plane from shred-CFRP is depicted in Figure 8. The shred-CFRP and twill-CFRP are the same as in Section 3.Figure 8
Monopole antenna for 5.9 GHz on a circular shred-CFRP ground plane.To measure the influence of a CFRP ground plane on a narrowband antenna, the monopole wire is trimmed such that it is resonant at5.9 GHz on an aluminum ground plane. The measuredS-parameters are depicted in Figure 9. The resonance frequency of the antenna is shifted to about 5.4 GHz when placed on the twill-CFRP. The length of the wire was not adjusted, as the return loss at 5.9 GHz is still better than 10 dB. In a practical application the dimensions will be adjusted, such that the antenna is resonant at the desired frequency.Figure 9
MeasuredS-parameters of the wire monopole antennas on different ground planes (reprinted with permission from [34]; ©2014 IEEE).Gain pattern measurements are performed inside the institute’s anechoic chamber. The vertical cuts of the gain patterns at azimuthφ=0∘ are shown in Figure 10. The horizontal cuts of the measured gain patterns are depicted in Figure 11. The patterns are normalized. Vertical cuts of the patterns show no significant deviation; no additional zeros or notches are introduced by the shred-CFRP. The influence of the shred-CFRP on the antenna’s radiation pattern in the horizontal plane is smaller than 1 dB and can be neglected in most applications. Radiation efficiency on the shred-CFRP ground plane is reduced by 23% (1.14 dB) compared to the efficiency on an aluminum ground plane in [34].Figure 10
Monopole antenna for5.9 GHz on a circular ground plane. Vertical cut of the normalized measured gain pattern for azimuth φ=0∘ (reprinted with permission from [34]; ©2014 IEEE).Figure 11
Monopole antenna for5.9 GHz on a circular ground plane. Horizontal cut of the normalized measured gain pattern for polar angel θ=90∘ (reprinted with permission from [34]; ©2014 IEEE).


## 4.2. Conical Monopole Antenna on CFRP Ground Planes

Conical monopole antennas turned from brass are used to measure the influence of CFRP as ground plane material on antennas from1 GHz to 10 GHz [35]. Cone dimensions are depicted in Figure 12. The cones have cylindrical stubs at the tip that fit tightly over the inner conductor of a coaxial SMA flange. As the ground planes have different thickness, several cones are manufactured with different lengths of the stubs, such that the tip of the cone is always positioned at the surface level of the material. The SMA flanges are screwed to threaded holes drilled into the ground planes. The antennas are measured on circular ground planes manufactured from shred-CFRP, twill-weave CFRP, UD-CFRP, and aluminum. All ground planes have a diameter of 300 mm. As threading the thin twill-CFRP ground plane in Section 4.1 was challenging, a thicker twill-CFRP was used as reference material for the measurements of the conical monopole antennas. The twill-CFRP is a 1.6 mm thick 2/2 twill weave stacked as [090] that is commercially available from CG-TEC and has a fiber volume fraction of 63% according to manufacturer.Figure 12
Cone dimensions of the broadband monopole antenna. The cylindrical stub on the bottom (red) is designed to fit over the inner conductor of an SMA flange, its length is adjusted to the thickness of the ground plane. All dimensions are in millimeter (reprinted with permission from [35]; ©2017 IEEE).MeasuredS-parameters are depicted in Figure 13. Return loss is better than 10 dB between 2 GHz and 10 GHz for all ground plane materials. The return loss with the UD-CFRP is a bit reduced but still better than 10 dB.Figure 13
MeasuredS-parameters of the conical monopole antenna on different ground plane materials (reprinted with permission from [35]; ©2017 IEEE).Gain patterns are again measured in the institute’s anechoic chamber (Figure14). Gain patterns presented in this section are not normalized and are given according to the IEEE gain definition based on accepted power, in order to emphasize the large influence of UD-CFRP in comparison to the shred-CFRP and twill-CFRP. Vertical cuts of the measured gain patterns are depicted in Figure 15. Cuts for azimuthal angle φ=0∘ and φ=90∘ are shown on the left and right side, respectively. For the UD-CFRP φ=0∘ corresponds with fiber direction and φ=90∘ is perpendicular to fiber direction. The CFRP with fiber shreds and the twill-weave CFRP perform similar to aluminum in the whole frequency range. With the UD-CFRP antenna gain in fiber direction (φ=0∘) is 1–4 dB lower than on aluminum. The shape of the gain pattern in fiber direction remains widely unchanged, but radiation perpendicular to fiber direction is greatly diminished for the UD-CFRP and the gain pattern is changed, especially for radiation in the horizontal plane θ≈90∘. For the conical monopole antenna radiation efficiency on shred-CFRP is measured close to that of aluminum in the frequency range from 1 GHz to 10 GHz, about 0.5 dB lower at 5.9 GHz [35].Figure 14
Conical monopole antenna on the shred-CFRP ground plane. The antenna is placed on a Rohacell column on an azimuth rotary stage inside the university’s anechoic chamber.Figure 15
Vertical cuts of the gain patterns. Cuts for azimuthal angleφ=0∘ and φ=90∘ are shown on the left and right side, respectively (reprinted with permission from [35]; ©2017 IEEE).
(a)
2 GHz
(b)
5 GHz
(c)
10 GHzThe measurements show that using a UD-CFRP has a huge influence on antennas. The anisotropic conductivity of UD-CFRP obstructs surface currents on the ground plane leading to reduced gain and changed radiation pattern perpendicular to fiber direction. Although the anisotropy may be useful [25], a good isotropic conductor is most desirable as antenna ground plane material. This issue is crucial in the automotive industry, where DSRC was recently introduced for safety relevant vehicle-to-vehicle communication. For electric car construction with a lightweight CFRP chassis, the materials should be chosen such that they do not impair antenna performance. The presented measurements show that this is achievable by placing either randomly oriented fiber shreds or woven fibers on top of any CFRP laminate. The electric currents are confined to the top most layer of the composite due to the skin effect. It is therefore feasible to only manufacture the top CFRP layer according to antenna considerations, whereas the remaining plies are designed to meet the mechanical requirements.The antenna performance differences between shred-CFRP, twill-CFRP, and aluminum in the investigated frequency range are negligible in most antenna applications. The conductivity of the CFRP with the shredded fibers seems to be even somewhat more isotropic than the conductivity of the twill-CFRP. Using recycled and shredded carbon fibers is desirable from an antenna viewpoint.


## 5. Conclusion

Quasi-isotropic CFRP with shredded carbon fibers in random alignment on the top layer are proposed for antenna applications. A CFRP laminate with carbon fiber shreds on top, but unidirectional fibers in the remaining plies, was manufactured. Carbon fiber shreds can be sourced from recycled CFRP, resulting in a sustainable product design.Material measurements with the Nicolson-Ross-Weir (NRW) method show that the radio-frequency properties of the proposed CFRP are close to isotropic in comparison to unidirectional and woven CFRP. The variations in measured material parameters can be explained by inhomogeneity in the medium, rather than anisotropies.Measurements of monopole antennas on the shredded-fiber CFRP show no influence on the antenna’s gain pattern. Radiation efficiency of a conical monopole antenna on a ground plane made from the proposed CFRP is close to100%.When being utilized as a ground plane material for antennas for IEEE 802.11p at5.9GHz, the shredded-fiber CFRP can be modeled as an isotropic material.



---

*Source: 6152651-2017-05-29.xml*