# Evaluation of Photocatalytic Active Coatings on Sintered Glass Tubes by Methylene Blue

Authors: Colin Awungacha Lekelefac; Peter Czermak; Michael Herrenbauer
Journal: International Journal of Photoenergy
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

A comparative study between ten different photocatalytic active coatings was done. The effectiveness and photocatalytic activity of the coatings were studied by degradation experiments of methylene blue (MB) dye under UV light illumination. The reactor design consisting of sintered glass packed in a borosilicate tube placed between two planar dielectric barrier discharge lamps (Osram Planon) is reported for the first time. The coatings consisted of either titania, silica, or zinc on sintered borosilicate glass. The advantage of sol-gel in catalyst preparation was exploited to combine catalyst to act as cocatalyst. TiO2-P25 widely applied in suspension systems was effectively immobilized on sintered glass support with the aid of tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) solution which acted as support material. Results indicated that TiO2-P25+SiO2, TiO2-P25+SiO2+Pt, and TiOSO4_30,6wt% films showed highest degradation rates close to 100% after 90 min illumination with degradation rates exceeding 50% after 30 minutes. TTIP+Pt showed lowest degradation rate.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The textile and chemical industry face the challenge to adequately dispose their waste water. Releasing chemicals and colored waste water in the ecosystem is a source of pollution and damage to aquatic life. In order to treat waste water physicochemical methods such as adsorption [1], chemical methods such as chlorination and ozonation [2], and biological methods [3] are the most frequently used approaches. The catalytic system can either be homogeneous or heterogeneous. In a heterogeneous system, both adsorption and photocatalysis take place and have major advantages such as reuse of catalyst; minimization of catalyst leaching or resistance to extreme physical and chemical conditions. A heterogeneous system is tested in this study with use of coatings produced through sol-gel basis on sintered glass in a borosilicate glass tube.Currently most photocatalytic reactors used for water treatment are suspension reactors with the advantage of high catalytic efficiency [4]. However, the catalyst particles have to be recovered after reaction through means such as ultrafiltration which bring along an additional process step and higher cost. Also, particulate matter may accumulate in the reactor during the concentration of a process effluent. Due to these reasons, a photocatalytically active layer on a support material is of growing interest. The setbacks of immobilized system are the less photonic efficiency values attained compared to suspension reactors because of mass transfer limitation [5]. For a good catalytic efficiency in an immobilized catalytic system, a good fluidic design of the system and extensions using the visible spectrum by catalyst doping can be of great importance. The selection and design of the supporting material influence both the fluidic design and the available catalyst surface. The photocatalytic efficiency increases with an increase in active surface. This means the carrier material has to provide a high surface to volume ratio. In this work, the use of coated sintered glass particles is to exploit both the advantages of a heterogeneous system and to obtain an optimal fluidic design by use of porous glass. The reactor design consisting of sintered glass with pore size between 150 and 250 μm and glass particle grain size between 200 and 400 μm packed in a borosilicate tube placed between two planar dielectric barrier discharge lamps (Osram Planon) is reported for the first time.Tinanyloxysulphate precursor used in this study had been reported by Hidalgo et al. [6, 7] to yield high photonic efficiency of 4–7%. This is a higher value as that obtained by Chen and Ray [8] who describes a suspension system. The aim of the study was to develop other catalysts systems and test their photocatalytic degradation efficiency with MB dye. Catalyst preparation in this study was via sol-gel route. Sol-gel route is a wet-chemical process with many advantages. The sol-gel offers simplicity in synthesis of sols, homogeneity of coatings, and ability to deposit coatings on larger and odd-shaped substrates. Furthermore, a simple modification of the film composition can be performed directly in the sol-gel process.Photocatalysis is the acceleration of a photoreaction in the presence of a catalyst. In a heterogeneous photocatalytic system, photo induced molecular transformations or reactions take place at the surface of a catalyst. Depending on where the initial excitation occurs, photocatalysis can be generally divided into two classes of processes [9]. When the initial photoexcitation occurs in an adsorbate molecule which then interacts with the ground state catalyst substrate, the process is referred to as a catalyzed photoreaction. When the initial photoexcitation takes place in the catalyst substrate and the photoexcited catalyst then transfers electrons or energy into a ground state molecule, the process is referred to as a sensitized photoreaction. In photogenerated catalysis, the photocatalytic activity (PCA) depends on the ability of the catalyst to create electron-hole pair which generates free radicals (e.g., hydroxyl radicals: OH•) able to undergo secondary reactions [9].The electron-hole pairs can also react with each other and therefore recombine. The recombination process is undesirable for photocatalysis because of the absence of charge carriers which should instead react with substrate molecules effecting photocatalysis. TiO2 has a band gap of 3.2 eV permitting light in the wavelength range between 200 and 390 nm to excite valence band electrons [10]. For photocatalysis, either artificial light or ultraviolet (UV-A) radiation from the sun can be used. This however represents only about 3% of sunlight and thus a limitation for processes solely dependent on UV light. The photocatalytic activity can be influenced by doping (also called impregnation). By addition of p- or n-type dopants, it is expected that intrabandgap states are formed thereby decreasing the band gap from 3.2 eV and thus producing a bathochromic shift in the absorption spectrum of TiO2. When metallic ion traps the photogenerated electrons, the half-filled electronic configuration gets disturbed and its stability decreases [11]. The trapped electrons can easily be transferred to an oxygen atom adsorbed on the surface of the catalyst, and the metallic ion can return to its original stable state, half-filled electronic structure [11]. Nonmetal dopants include carbon, sulfur, and nitrogen, [12–14]. Metal dopants are for example gold, platinum, silver, iron, and vanadium [15–19]. The metals are defined as small particles deposited on the catalyst [20]. The effectiveness and photocatalytic activity of the coatings were studied by degradation experiments of MB dye under UV light illumination. MB was used as model dye because of its heteroatomic chemical nature consisting of C, H, N, and S. Moreover, MB is widely used as colorants, and there is a change in colour when it degrades over time.


### 1.1. Degradation and Mineralization of MB Dye

Houas et al. [21] report the degradation pathway of MB (Figure 1) as follows.(i)
MB degradation begins with cleavage of C–S+=C functional group via a columbic interaction between  C–S+=C functional group and basic TiO2 [22].(ii)
Opening of the central aromatic ring containing both heteroatoms, S and N. The origin of H atoms necessary to C–H and N–H bond formation can be gained from the proton reduction by photogenerated electrons [23, 24].(iii)
Formation of a sulfoxide, a sulfone and a sulfonic group as observed in Fenamiphos degradation [22].(iv)
The sulfoxide group can undergo a second attack by an OH• radical producing the sulfone (nondetected) and causing the definitive dissociation of the two benzenic rings. The sulfone can be attacked by OH• giving sulfonic acid.(v)
Radical R–C6H4• can subsequently react with OH• giving phenolic compounds [23].(vi)
Progressive degradation by OH• attacking dimethyl-phenyl-amino groups, aldehydes which decarboxylates into CO2.Conclusively, the degradation leads to the conversion of organic carbon into harmless gaseous CO2 and that of nitrogen and sulfur heteroatoms into inorganic ions, such as nitrate and ammonium and sulfate ions, respectively [21].Figure 1
The chemical structure of methylene blue (drawn with Symyx Draw).


## 1.1. Degradation and Mineralization of MB Dye

Houas et al. [21] report the degradation pathway of MB (Figure 1) as follows.(i)
MB degradation begins with cleavage of C–S+=C functional group via a columbic interaction between  C–S+=C functional group and basic TiO2 [22].(ii)
Opening of the central aromatic ring containing both heteroatoms, S and N. The origin of H atoms necessary to C–H and N–H bond formation can be gained from the proton reduction by photogenerated electrons [23, 24].(iii)
Formation of a sulfoxide, a sulfone and a sulfonic group as observed in Fenamiphos degradation [22].(iv)
The sulfoxide group can undergo a second attack by an OH• radical producing the sulfone (nondetected) and causing the definitive dissociation of the two benzenic rings. The sulfone can be attacked by OH• giving sulfonic acid.(v)
Radical R–C6H4• can subsequently react with OH• giving phenolic compounds [23].(vi)
Progressive degradation by OH• attacking dimethyl-phenyl-amino groups, aldehydes which decarboxylates into CO2.Conclusively, the degradation leads to the conversion of organic carbon into harmless gaseous CO2 and that of nitrogen and sulfur heteroatoms into inorganic ions, such as nitrate and ammonium and sulfate ions, respectively [21].Figure 1
The chemical structure of methylene blue (drawn with Symyx Draw).


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Photocatalytic Experiments

The reaction setup consisted of TiO2 coatings on sintered glass (150–250 μm nominal pore size), packed in a borosilicate tube 26 cm long and 1 cm in diameter. Glass particle grain size was between 200 and 400 μm.The photocatalytic activity of the coatings was tested by the photooxidation of methylene blue in water with a starting concentration of 14 mg/L in 200 mL as feed volume. The tube was placed between two planar dielectric barrier discharge lamps (Osram Planon) emitting UV light of wavelength around 280–420 nm (Figures2 and 3).Figure 2
Experimental setup for the photocatalytic degradation of MB.Figure 3
Photocatalytic reactor.Methylene blue solution was pumped through the reactor using roller pumps in a continuous manner with a flow rate of 15 mL/min. Samples were collected at intervals up till a period of 4 h reaction time. Reactions were carried out at room temperature. Blank experiments were performed in the absence of UV light illumination as well as with uncoated sintered glass plates. The concentration of methylene blue in the reaction mixture was measured at regular intervals by measuring the absorbance of an aliquot solution. This was done using a UV-visible (Thermo-Scientific Genesys 10S) spectrophotometer (at 665 nm) with deionized water as reference. A Beer-Lambert diagram was established to correlate the absorbance at 665 nm to MB concentration. The percentage degradation was calculated as follows:(1)Degradation(%)=(C-C0C0)×100C0 is the initial concentration of lignin and C is the concentration of methylene blue after photoirradiation. The photocatalytic decomposition of the organic molecules follows the Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetics, which may be represented as [21, 25]
(2)-dCdt=-kCCOH•C is the concentration of methylene blue and COH• the hydroxyl radical concentration. By the pseudostationary hypothesis (i.e., the COH• can be considered to be constant because of the continuous hydroxyl ion generation by photocatalysis) the rate depends only on the methylene blue concentration [26]. The rate expression can be written as follows:
(3)-ln(CC0)=kt.
The linear plot of ln(C/C0) versus t gives the rate constant, k (slope).


### 2.2. Material and Method

ZnO (5 m2/g) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich-Germany, titanium (IV) oxide sulfate dehydrate (titanyloxyssulfate) was purchased from Alfa Aesar. Titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP), chloroplatinic acid hydrate (99.999%), polyethylene glycol (average Mn 300) were purchased from Aldrich. Aeroxide TiO2 P25 (surface area 50 m2/g and average particle size 30 nm) was obtained from Evonik and consisted of 70% anatas and 30% rutil. Methylene blue, tetraethylortosilicate (TEOS) and ammonium monovanadate were purchased from Merck. Borosilicate glass tubes containing sintered glass particles were obtained from ROBU-Germany. All chemicals were used as received.


#### 2.2.1. Preparation of TEOS Solution

Tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) sol was prepared by adding dropwise 77 mL of 2-propanol mixed with 5 mL of H2O and 4 mL of HNO3 to 22 mL TEOS at room temperature. The resultant solution was stirred for 2 h.


#### 2.2.2. Preparation of TiOSO4_30,6 wt% Gel

In a 200 mL beaker 45,9 g of TiOSO4 (Alfa Aesar) was weighed and 104,1 mL of water was added. The suspension was stirred till a clear solution was obtained. The solution was heated up to 85°C while adding 5 N NaOH dropwise until a pH of 5,5 was reached. The temperature was maintained for 8 h under stirring. After that, the gel was washed 3 times with 75 mL water each time. The gel was resuspended in distilled water using 150 mL of water and then sonicated for 6 h. After sonication the gel was ready for coating.


#### 2.2.3. Preparation of TiO2-P25 Suspension

TiO2-P25 (Aeroxide, TiO2, Evonik Industries) suspensions were prepared by adding 8,75 g TiO2-P25 to 50 mL water and sonicated for 60 min. Tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) layers were applied on the glass substrate before coating with TiO2-P25.


#### 2.2.4. Preparation of ZnO Suspension

12 g of ZnO was added to 150 mL of water and stirred for 1 h. In a separate beaker, nitric acid (65%) was added dropwise to 60 mL TEOS solution till a pH 1,55 was reached. ZnO suspension was then mixed with TEOS by adding dropwise TEOS to ZnO suspension and stirred for 2 h at room temperature.


#### 2.2.5. Preparation of ZnO+TiO2-P25-SiO2 Suspension

TiO2-P25 suspension was prepared by adding 5,25 g TiO2-P25 in 30 mL water and sonicated for 60 min. From the previously prepared ZnO/TEOS suspension, 20 mL was added to TiO2-P25 suspension and left to mix for 2 h at room temperature.


#### 2.2.6. Preparation of TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+PEG Gel

In a beaker, 7,4 g of PEG-300, 45,9 g of TiOSO4, and 104,1 mL of water were mixed together. The suspension was stirred till a clear solution was obtained. The solution was heated up to 85°C while adding 5 N NaOH dropwise until a pH of 5,5 was reached. The temperature was maintained for 8 h under continual stirring. Following that, the gel was washed 3 times with 75 mL water each time. The gel was resuspended in distilled water using 150 mL of water and then sonicated for 6 h. After sonication, the gel was ready for coatings.


#### 2.2.7. Preparation of TiO2-P25-SiO2+Pt, TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+NH3, TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+NH4VO3, TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+NH3, and TTIP+Pt Gels

The amount of dopant used was 1 wt% relative to TiO2 concentration in the gel or suspension in question. The metal precursor was directly added to the gel and then stirred for 30 min prior to coating. For example, 86 mg of NH4VO3 was added in a 75 mL TiO2 gel derived from TiOSO4_30,6 wt%.


#### 2.2.8. Preparation of TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+TiO2-P25 Suspension

TiO2-P25 suspensions was prepared by dissolving 3,5 g TiO2-P25 in 20 mL water and sonicated for 60 min. To this suspension 30 mL of TiOSO4_30,6 wt% gel was added and sonicated for 1 h at 25°C.


#### 2.2.9. Preparation of TTIP Gel

TiO2 gel was prepared by mixing 36 mL of titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP), 400 mL of H2O, and 3.8 mL of HNO3 (65% w/w). The mixture was stirred for 24 h at room temperature (25°C) and then left to stand for 6 h (ageing time).


#### 2.2.10. Coating Procedure of TEOS on Glass

TEOS was pumped through both sides of the glass tube and then left to dry at 150°C. The oven temperature was then raised to 300°C and maintained for 3 h. Coating with TiO2-P25 then followed.


#### 2.2.11. Coating Procedure of Gels and Suspensions on Glass

The gel was pumped with use of a roller pump through each side of the glass tubes to ensure a homogeneous coating. This was done for each time for 3 min with the pumping rate set at 10 mL/min. After coating, the tubes were placed in an oven and heating rate was set at 5°C/min. When the oven attained 110°C, the tubes were left to dry for 2 h. In order to carry out the calcinations step, the oven temperature was raised to 500°C with heating rate still maintained at 5°C/min. The oven temperature was maintained at 500°C for 1 h. After the oven had cooled down, the tubes were removed from the oven and were now ready for photocatalytic experiments.


## 2.1. Photocatalytic Experiments

The reaction setup consisted of TiO2 coatings on sintered glass (150–250 μm nominal pore size), packed in a borosilicate tube 26 cm long and 1 cm in diameter. Glass particle grain size was between 200 and 400 μm.The photocatalytic activity of the coatings was tested by the photooxidation of methylene blue in water with a starting concentration of 14 mg/L in 200 mL as feed volume. The tube was placed between two planar dielectric barrier discharge lamps (Osram Planon) emitting UV light of wavelength around 280–420 nm (Figures2 and 3).Figure 2
Experimental setup for the photocatalytic degradation of MB.Figure 3
Photocatalytic reactor.Methylene blue solution was pumped through the reactor using roller pumps in a continuous manner with a flow rate of 15 mL/min. Samples were collected at intervals up till a period of 4 h reaction time. Reactions were carried out at room temperature. Blank experiments were performed in the absence of UV light illumination as well as with uncoated sintered glass plates. The concentration of methylene blue in the reaction mixture was measured at regular intervals by measuring the absorbance of an aliquot solution. This was done using a UV-visible (Thermo-Scientific Genesys 10S) spectrophotometer (at 665 nm) with deionized water as reference. A Beer-Lambert diagram was established to correlate the absorbance at 665 nm to MB concentration. The percentage degradation was calculated as follows:(1)Degradation(%)=(C-C0C0)×100C0 is the initial concentration of lignin and C is the concentration of methylene blue after photoirradiation. The photocatalytic decomposition of the organic molecules follows the Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetics, which may be represented as [21, 25]
(2)-dCdt=-kCCOH•C is the concentration of methylene blue and COH• the hydroxyl radical concentration. By the pseudostationary hypothesis (i.e., the COH• can be considered to be constant because of the continuous hydroxyl ion generation by photocatalysis) the rate depends only on the methylene blue concentration [26]. The rate expression can be written as follows:
(3)-ln(CC0)=kt.
The linear plot of ln(C/C0) versus t gives the rate constant, k (slope).


## 2.2. Material and Method

ZnO (5 m2/g) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich-Germany, titanium (IV) oxide sulfate dehydrate (titanyloxyssulfate) was purchased from Alfa Aesar. Titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP), chloroplatinic acid hydrate (99.999%), polyethylene glycol (average Mn 300) were purchased from Aldrich. Aeroxide TiO2 P25 (surface area 50 m2/g and average particle size 30 nm) was obtained from Evonik and consisted of 70% anatas and 30% rutil. Methylene blue, tetraethylortosilicate (TEOS) and ammonium monovanadate were purchased from Merck. Borosilicate glass tubes containing sintered glass particles were obtained from ROBU-Germany. All chemicals were used as received.


### 2.2.1. Preparation of TEOS Solution

Tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) sol was prepared by adding dropwise 77 mL of 2-propanol mixed with 5 mL of H2O and 4 mL of HNO3 to 22 mL TEOS at room temperature. The resultant solution was stirred for 2 h.


### 2.2.2. Preparation of TiOSO4_30,6 wt% Gel

In a 200 mL beaker 45,9 g of TiOSO4 (Alfa Aesar) was weighed and 104,1 mL of water was added. The suspension was stirred till a clear solution was obtained. The solution was heated up to 85°C while adding 5 N NaOH dropwise until a pH of 5,5 was reached. The temperature was maintained for 8 h under stirring. After that, the gel was washed 3 times with 75 mL water each time. The gel was resuspended in distilled water using 150 mL of water and then sonicated for 6 h. After sonication the gel was ready for coating.


### 2.2.3. Preparation of TiO2-P25 Suspension

TiO2-P25 (Aeroxide, TiO2, Evonik Industries) suspensions were prepared by adding 8,75 g TiO2-P25 to 50 mL water and sonicated for 60 min. Tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) layers were applied on the glass substrate before coating with TiO2-P25.


### 2.2.4. Preparation of ZnO Suspension

12 g of ZnO was added to 150 mL of water and stirred for 1 h. In a separate beaker, nitric acid (65%) was added dropwise to 60 mL TEOS solution till a pH 1,55 was reached. ZnO suspension was then mixed with TEOS by adding dropwise TEOS to ZnO suspension and stirred for 2 h at room temperature.


### 2.2.5. Preparation of ZnO+TiO2-P25-SiO2 Suspension

TiO2-P25 suspension was prepared by adding 5,25 g TiO2-P25 in 30 mL water and sonicated for 60 min. From the previously prepared ZnO/TEOS suspension, 20 mL was added to TiO2-P25 suspension and left to mix for 2 h at room temperature.


### 2.2.6. Preparation of TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+PEG Gel

In a beaker, 7,4 g of PEG-300, 45,9 g of TiOSO4, and 104,1 mL of water were mixed together. The suspension was stirred till a clear solution was obtained. The solution was heated up to 85°C while adding 5 N NaOH dropwise until a pH of 5,5 was reached. The temperature was maintained for 8 h under continual stirring. Following that, the gel was washed 3 times with 75 mL water each time. The gel was resuspended in distilled water using 150 mL of water and then sonicated for 6 h. After sonication, the gel was ready for coatings.


### 2.2.7. Preparation of TiO2-P25-SiO2+Pt, TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+NH3, TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+NH4VO3, TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+NH3, and TTIP+Pt Gels

The amount of dopant used was 1 wt% relative to TiO2 concentration in the gel or suspension in question. The metal precursor was directly added to the gel and then stirred for 30 min prior to coating. For example, 86 mg of NH4VO3 was added in a 75 mL TiO2 gel derived from TiOSO4_30,6 wt%.


### 2.2.8. Preparation of TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+TiO2-P25 Suspension

TiO2-P25 suspensions was prepared by dissolving 3,5 g TiO2-P25 in 20 mL water and sonicated for 60 min. To this suspension 30 mL of TiOSO4_30,6 wt% gel was added and sonicated for 1 h at 25°C.


### 2.2.9. Preparation of TTIP Gel

TiO2 gel was prepared by mixing 36 mL of titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP), 400 mL of H2O, and 3.8 mL of HNO3 (65% w/w). The mixture was stirred for 24 h at room temperature (25°C) and then left to stand for 6 h (ageing time).


### 2.2.10. Coating Procedure of TEOS on Glass

TEOS was pumped through both sides of the glass tube and then left to dry at 150°C. The oven temperature was then raised to 300°C and maintained for 3 h. Coating with TiO2-P25 then followed.


### 2.2.11. Coating Procedure of Gels and Suspensions on Glass

The gel was pumped with use of a roller pump through each side of the glass tubes to ensure a homogeneous coating. This was done for each time for 3 min with the pumping rate set at 10 mL/min. After coating, the tubes were placed in an oven and heating rate was set at 5°C/min. When the oven attained 110°C, the tubes were left to dry for 2 h. In order to carry out the calcinations step, the oven temperature was raised to 500°C with heating rate still maintained at 5°C/min. The oven temperature was maintained at 500°C for 1 h. After the oven had cooled down, the tubes were removed from the oven and were now ready for photocatalytic experiments.


## 2.2.1. Preparation of TEOS Solution

Tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) sol was prepared by adding dropwise 77 mL of 2-propanol mixed with 5 mL of H2O and 4 mL of HNO3 to 22 mL TEOS at room temperature. The resultant solution was stirred for 2 h.


## 2.2.2. Preparation of TiOSO4_30,6 wt% Gel

In a 200 mL beaker 45,9 g of TiOSO4 (Alfa Aesar) was weighed and 104,1 mL of water was added. The suspension was stirred till a clear solution was obtained. The solution was heated up to 85°C while adding 5 N NaOH dropwise until a pH of 5,5 was reached. The temperature was maintained for 8 h under stirring. After that, the gel was washed 3 times with 75 mL water each time. The gel was resuspended in distilled water using 150 mL of water and then sonicated for 6 h. After sonication the gel was ready for coating.


## 2.2.3. Preparation of TiO2-P25 Suspension

TiO2-P25 (Aeroxide, TiO2, Evonik Industries) suspensions were prepared by adding 8,75 g TiO2-P25 to 50 mL water and sonicated for 60 min. Tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) layers were applied on the glass substrate before coating with TiO2-P25.


## 2.2.4. Preparation of ZnO Suspension

12 g of ZnO was added to 150 mL of water and stirred for 1 h. In a separate beaker, nitric acid (65%) was added dropwise to 60 mL TEOS solution till a pH 1,55 was reached. ZnO suspension was then mixed with TEOS by adding dropwise TEOS to ZnO suspension and stirred for 2 h at room temperature.


## 2.2.5. Preparation of ZnO+TiO2-P25-SiO2 Suspension

TiO2-P25 suspension was prepared by adding 5,25 g TiO2-P25 in 30 mL water and sonicated for 60 min. From the previously prepared ZnO/TEOS suspension, 20 mL was added to TiO2-P25 suspension and left to mix for 2 h at room temperature.


## 2.2.6. Preparation of TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+PEG Gel

In a beaker, 7,4 g of PEG-300, 45,9 g of TiOSO4, and 104,1 mL of water were mixed together. The suspension was stirred till a clear solution was obtained. The solution was heated up to 85°C while adding 5 N NaOH dropwise until a pH of 5,5 was reached. The temperature was maintained for 8 h under continual stirring. Following that, the gel was washed 3 times with 75 mL water each time. The gel was resuspended in distilled water using 150 mL of water and then sonicated for 6 h. After sonication, the gel was ready for coatings.


## 2.2.7. Preparation of TiO2-P25-SiO2+Pt, TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+NH3, TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+NH4VO3, TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+NH3, and TTIP+Pt Gels

The amount of dopant used was 1 wt% relative to TiO2 concentration in the gel or suspension in question. The metal precursor was directly added to the gel and then stirred for 30 min prior to coating. For example, 86 mg of NH4VO3 was added in a 75 mL TiO2 gel derived from TiOSO4_30,6 wt%.


## 2.2.8. Preparation of TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+TiO2-P25 Suspension

TiO2-P25 suspensions was prepared by dissolving 3,5 g TiO2-P25 in 20 mL water and sonicated for 60 min. To this suspension 30 mL of TiOSO4_30,6 wt% gel was added and sonicated for 1 h at 25°C.


## 2.2.9. Preparation of TTIP Gel

TiO2 gel was prepared by mixing 36 mL of titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP), 400 mL of H2O, and 3.8 mL of HNO3 (65% w/w). The mixture was stirred for 24 h at room temperature (25°C) and then left to stand for 6 h (ageing time).


## 2.2.10. Coating Procedure of TEOS on Glass

TEOS was pumped through both sides of the glass tube and then left to dry at 150°C. The oven temperature was then raised to 300°C and maintained for 3 h. Coating with TiO2-P25 then followed.


## 2.2.11. Coating Procedure of Gels and Suspensions on Glass

The gel was pumped with use of a roller pump through each side of the glass tubes to ensure a homogeneous coating. This was done for each time for 3 min with the pumping rate set at 10 mL/min. After coating, the tubes were placed in an oven and heating rate was set at 5°C/min. When the oven attained 110°C, the tubes were left to dry for 2 h. In order to carry out the calcinations step, the oven temperature was raised to 500°C with heating rate still maintained at 5°C/min. The oven temperature was maintained at 500°C for 1 h. After the oven had cooled down, the tubes were removed from the oven and were now ready for photocatalytic experiments.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Morphology of Coating

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was the primary tool for characterizing the surface morphology and fundamental physical properties of the material surface such as porosity, shape, and appropriate size distribution of coating. Samples consisted of sintered glass plates cut to a size of 1 cm2 dipped into the gel or suspension. Drying and calcination were done the same as was the case with borosilicate glass tubes. The micrographs for the uncoated sintered glass, Figures 4(a) and 4(b), show structures formed by glass particles of approx. 200–400 μm in size sintered together. Figures 4(c)–4(f) show micrographs of the coated glass material. It can be observed that the form and structure of the coating are considerably well distributed all over the surface of the sintered glass. Figures 4(e) and 4(f) consist of a double coating whereby TEOS is first coated and TiO2-P25 follows. Figure 4(f) shows a micrograph with higher resolution and the thickness of the coating can be seen. Some fissures are also observed at joints between sintered particles and on the glass particles as a result of drying. It is worthwhile noting that these micrographs originate from sintered glass plates whereby the drying mechanism could be harsher as heat radiations directly strike on them as compared to a borosilicate glass tube encaging the sintered glass particles.SEM images for uncoated borosilicate sintered glass ((a) and (b)), TiO2 (TiOSO4_30,6 wt%) coating on borosilicate glass ((c) and (d)), (e) TiO2-P25-SiO2, (f) TiO2-P25-SiO2.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)


### 3.2. Degradation Experiments

UV-Vis spectroscopy was applied to monitor MB degradation. Absorption maxima appear at wavelength 291 nm and 665 nm. An example of such a spectrum is represented in Figure5. The coating consisted of TiOSO4_30,6 wt% under photocatalysis of MB for a period of 4 h. The samples were collected at intervals: (−60, −15, 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180) min. Minus (−) 60 and −15 min samples were collected 60 min and 15 min, respectively, before putting on UV illumination. (×2) describes the dilution coefficient in order that peaks fit in range of the absorption spectrum. Maximum absorption in the visible range at 665nm was selected to follow MB degradation.Figure 5
Typical time dependent UV-Vis absorption spectra of aqueous MB solution irradiated with UV light (280–420 nm) for different time intervals. The spectrum is obtained for sol-gel derived TiO2 from titanyloxysulphate.Figure6 shows an absorbance-time diagram of MB. The reaction was performed in the dark with uncoated sintered glass. No significant adsorption is noted. With the presence of TiO2 coating, one notes a very strong adsorption till approx. 60 min suggesting adsorption equilibrium is attained after 60 min recirculation in the dark (Figure 7). For all experiments, MB was hence recirculated through the reactor for 60 min before UV light was put on. The adsorption mechanism is a result of columbic interaction between MB which has a cationic configuration and OH− ions present on the surface of TiO2 nanocrystallites [21]. The time dependent UV-Vis absorption spectra of aqueous MB show a decrease in absorbance for peaks at 665 nm and 291 nm as MB blue degrades (Figure 5). A shoulder at around 665 nm was observed. Other peak formation was noted at wavelengths 220 nm and 240 nm. This suggested the formation of intermediate products. Absorbance for both the intermediate peak and parent MB peak reduced with time and after 3 h no peaks were observed indicating destruction of MB dye and intermediate products.Figure 6
Absorption-time diagram, uncoated glass and no lights.Figure 7
Absorption-time diagram, coated glass and no lights.Decolorization of MB solution was observed during the photocatalytic degradation experiments. Figure8 depicts the decolorization pattern obtained with TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+TiO2-P25 catalyst over time. From left to rights, samples were collected after −60, −15, 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180 min.Figure 8
MB decolorization with TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+TiO2-P25 catalyst.Figure9 shows the change in MB concentration in the recirculating reactor, while Figure 10 shows the plot of ln(C/C0) versus t for rate constant determination. A decrease in MB concentration in the presence of UV light is observed for all catalytic systems. However in the absence of UV light with coated glass material, a slight change in concentration close to 20% attributed to adsorption effects was observed. UV light brought along the source of photons needed by the catalyst for electron excitation and hence reaction. Once the photons intercept with the catalyst, they absorb light generating surface trapped electron hole pairs, which undergo the interfacial processes of oxygen reduction and methylene blue oxidation.Figure 9
Change in concentration of MB with time. MB initial concentration: 14 mg/L, UV radiationλ>280 nm–420 nm, recirculating reactor open to air, absorption at 665 nm and immobilized catalysts.Figure 10
Plot ofln(C/C0) versus t for rate constant determination.TiO2-P25+SiO2, TiO2-P25+SiO2+Pt, and TiOSO4_30 wt% showed highest degradation rates close to 100% after 90 min illumination with degradation rates exceeding 50% after 30 minutes. TTIP+Pt and TTIP showed lowest degradation rates (Figure 11). TiOSO4_30,6 wt% showed highest reaction rate of 0,0313 min−1 followed by TiO2-P25+SiO2+Pt, TiO2-P25+SiO2, and TiOSO4+TiO2-P25 showing reaction rates of 0,0263 min−1, 0,0215 min−1, and 0,0210 min−1, respectively (Figure 12).Figure 11
Degradation kinetic of MB using diverse immobilized catalyst under UV light. MB initial concentration: 14 mg/L, UV radiationλ>280 nm–420 nm, recirculating reactor open to air, absorption at 665 nm and immobilized catalysts.Figure 12
Reaction rates of the photocatalytic degradation of MB (14 mg/L) under UV light on immobilized catalysts.The aim of combining catalysts was to achieve optimum catalytic activity by increasing total active surface area and hence the availability of more active sites on catalyst surface. TiO2-P25 was made to bind on the glass substrate by the aid of TEOS. SiO2 which comprises TEOS has been widely applied as catalytic support materials due to its versatile properties and tunable parameters (e.g., pore size and specific surface area (SSA)) and hence could also have played the role of stabilizing the coating as a binding system [27]. Moreover, because TEOS in solution is colorless and while coated it remains colorless, it therefore had no adverse effect on the turbidity of the reaction or transparency of the coatings. This transparent nature assures the photon flux to be easily intercepted by the catalyst. On the contrary case, there would be a decrease in penetration of UV light and hence the photoactivated volume of the reactant solution decreases [28]. TEOS could also have an adverse effect in compromising the viscosity of the gel, morphology and crystalline nature of catalyst on glass, and composition of catalyst to be impregnated.Nitrogen addition as dopant so as to mitigate intrabandgap states [11] was tested by the addition of NH3 and NH4VO3 to TiOSO4 as catalyst precursor. Reaction rates achieved for NH3 and NH4VO3 were 0,0184 min−1 and 0,0133 min−1 making a difference of 39% which was far still lower than that obtained by using unmodified TiOSO4. The reaction rate of TiOSO4_30,6 wt%_NH3 was 70% lower than that of TiOSO4_30,6 wt%. The adverse results obtained by N2 addition can be because total active surface area on catalyst reduces with excess N2 addition and hence availability of less active sites on catalyst surface [29]. Addition of PEG (polyethylene glycol), ZnO, NH3, and NH4VO3 to the catalytic system all gave degradation rates greater than 50% after 60 min of reaction. After 90 min reaction time degradation rates reached were in the order TiOSO4_30,6 wt% > TiO2-P25+SiO2+Pt ≈ TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+TiO2-P25 > TiO2-P25+SiO2 > TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+NH3  ≈ TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+NH4VO3 > ZnO+TiOSO4_30,6 wt% ≈ TiOSO4+PEG > TTIP > TTIP+Pt. Degradation values were 97%, 92%, 91%, 89%, 82%, 80%, 74%, 74%, 69%, and 62%, respectively. Use of PEG was to prevent the aggregation of titania particles in the gel [30]. Adding Pt to TiO2-P25+SiO2 system brought about a corresponding increase in reaction rate close to 10% probably because of the formation of intrabandgaps and thus curbing electron-hole pair recombination.


## 3.1. Morphology of Coating

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was the primary tool for characterizing the surface morphology and fundamental physical properties of the material surface such as porosity, shape, and appropriate size distribution of coating. Samples consisted of sintered glass plates cut to a size of 1 cm2 dipped into the gel or suspension. Drying and calcination were done the same as was the case with borosilicate glass tubes. The micrographs for the uncoated sintered glass, Figures 4(a) and 4(b), show structures formed by glass particles of approx. 200–400 μm in size sintered together. Figures 4(c)–4(f) show micrographs of the coated glass material. It can be observed that the form and structure of the coating are considerably well distributed all over the surface of the sintered glass. Figures 4(e) and 4(f) consist of a double coating whereby TEOS is first coated and TiO2-P25 follows. Figure 4(f) shows a micrograph with higher resolution and the thickness of the coating can be seen. Some fissures are also observed at joints between sintered particles and on the glass particles as a result of drying. It is worthwhile noting that these micrographs originate from sintered glass plates whereby the drying mechanism could be harsher as heat radiations directly strike on them as compared to a borosilicate glass tube encaging the sintered glass particles.SEM images for uncoated borosilicate sintered glass ((a) and (b)), TiO2 (TiOSO4_30,6 wt%) coating on borosilicate glass ((c) and (d)), (e) TiO2-P25-SiO2, (f) TiO2-P25-SiO2.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)


## 3.2. Degradation Experiments

UV-Vis spectroscopy was applied to monitor MB degradation. Absorption maxima appear at wavelength 291 nm and 665 nm. An example of such a spectrum is represented in Figure5. The coating consisted of TiOSO4_30,6 wt% under photocatalysis of MB for a period of 4 h. The samples were collected at intervals: (−60, −15, 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180) min. Minus (−) 60 and −15 min samples were collected 60 min and 15 min, respectively, before putting on UV illumination. (×2) describes the dilution coefficient in order that peaks fit in range of the absorption spectrum. Maximum absorption in the visible range at 665nm was selected to follow MB degradation.Figure 5
Typical time dependent UV-Vis absorption spectra of aqueous MB solution irradiated with UV light (280–420 nm) for different time intervals. The spectrum is obtained for sol-gel derived TiO2 from titanyloxysulphate.Figure6 shows an absorbance-time diagram of MB. The reaction was performed in the dark with uncoated sintered glass. No significant adsorption is noted. With the presence of TiO2 coating, one notes a very strong adsorption till approx. 60 min suggesting adsorption equilibrium is attained after 60 min recirculation in the dark (Figure 7). For all experiments, MB was hence recirculated through the reactor for 60 min before UV light was put on. The adsorption mechanism is a result of columbic interaction between MB which has a cationic configuration and OH− ions present on the surface of TiO2 nanocrystallites [21]. The time dependent UV-Vis absorption spectra of aqueous MB show a decrease in absorbance for peaks at 665 nm and 291 nm as MB blue degrades (Figure 5). A shoulder at around 665 nm was observed. Other peak formation was noted at wavelengths 220 nm and 240 nm. This suggested the formation of intermediate products. Absorbance for both the intermediate peak and parent MB peak reduced with time and after 3 h no peaks were observed indicating destruction of MB dye and intermediate products.Figure 6
Absorption-time diagram, uncoated glass and no lights.Figure 7
Absorption-time diagram, coated glass and no lights.Decolorization of MB solution was observed during the photocatalytic degradation experiments. Figure8 depicts the decolorization pattern obtained with TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+TiO2-P25 catalyst over time. From left to rights, samples were collected after −60, −15, 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180 min.Figure 8
MB decolorization with TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+TiO2-P25 catalyst.Figure9 shows the change in MB concentration in the recirculating reactor, while Figure 10 shows the plot of ln(C/C0) versus t for rate constant determination. A decrease in MB concentration in the presence of UV light is observed for all catalytic systems. However in the absence of UV light with coated glass material, a slight change in concentration close to 20% attributed to adsorption effects was observed. UV light brought along the source of photons needed by the catalyst for electron excitation and hence reaction. Once the photons intercept with the catalyst, they absorb light generating surface trapped electron hole pairs, which undergo the interfacial processes of oxygen reduction and methylene blue oxidation.Figure 9
Change in concentration of MB with time. MB initial concentration: 14 mg/L, UV radiationλ>280 nm–420 nm, recirculating reactor open to air, absorption at 665 nm and immobilized catalysts.Figure 10
Plot ofln(C/C0) versus t for rate constant determination.TiO2-P25+SiO2, TiO2-P25+SiO2+Pt, and TiOSO4_30 wt% showed highest degradation rates close to 100% after 90 min illumination with degradation rates exceeding 50% after 30 minutes. TTIP+Pt and TTIP showed lowest degradation rates (Figure 11). TiOSO4_30,6 wt% showed highest reaction rate of 0,0313 min−1 followed by TiO2-P25+SiO2+Pt, TiO2-P25+SiO2, and TiOSO4+TiO2-P25 showing reaction rates of 0,0263 min−1, 0,0215 min−1, and 0,0210 min−1, respectively (Figure 12).Figure 11
Degradation kinetic of MB using diverse immobilized catalyst under UV light. MB initial concentration: 14 mg/L, UV radiationλ>280 nm–420 nm, recirculating reactor open to air, absorption at 665 nm and immobilized catalysts.Figure 12
Reaction rates of the photocatalytic degradation of MB (14 mg/L) under UV light on immobilized catalysts.The aim of combining catalysts was to achieve optimum catalytic activity by increasing total active surface area and hence the availability of more active sites on catalyst surface. TiO2-P25 was made to bind on the glass substrate by the aid of TEOS. SiO2 which comprises TEOS has been widely applied as catalytic support materials due to its versatile properties and tunable parameters (e.g., pore size and specific surface area (SSA)) and hence could also have played the role of stabilizing the coating as a binding system [27]. Moreover, because TEOS in solution is colorless and while coated it remains colorless, it therefore had no adverse effect on the turbidity of the reaction or transparency of the coatings. This transparent nature assures the photon flux to be easily intercepted by the catalyst. On the contrary case, there would be a decrease in penetration of UV light and hence the photoactivated volume of the reactant solution decreases [28]. TEOS could also have an adverse effect in compromising the viscosity of the gel, morphology and crystalline nature of catalyst on glass, and composition of catalyst to be impregnated.Nitrogen addition as dopant so as to mitigate intrabandgap states [11] was tested by the addition of NH3 and NH4VO3 to TiOSO4 as catalyst precursor. Reaction rates achieved for NH3 and NH4VO3 were 0,0184 min−1 and 0,0133 min−1 making a difference of 39% which was far still lower than that obtained by using unmodified TiOSO4. The reaction rate of TiOSO4_30,6 wt%_NH3 was 70% lower than that of TiOSO4_30,6 wt%. The adverse results obtained by N2 addition can be because total active surface area on catalyst reduces with excess N2 addition and hence availability of less active sites on catalyst surface [29]. Addition of PEG (polyethylene glycol), ZnO, NH3, and NH4VO3 to the catalytic system all gave degradation rates greater than 50% after 60 min of reaction. After 90 min reaction time degradation rates reached were in the order TiOSO4_30,6 wt% > TiO2-P25+SiO2+Pt ≈ TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+TiO2-P25 > TiO2-P25+SiO2 > TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+NH3  ≈ TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+NH4VO3 > ZnO+TiOSO4_30,6 wt% ≈ TiOSO4+PEG > TTIP > TTIP+Pt. Degradation values were 97%, 92%, 91%, 89%, 82%, 80%, 74%, 74%, 69%, and 62%, respectively. Use of PEG was to prevent the aggregation of titania particles in the gel [30]. Adding Pt to TiO2-P25+SiO2 system brought about a corresponding increase in reaction rate close to 10% probably because of the formation of intrabandgaps and thus curbing electron-hole pair recombination.


## 4. Conclusion

This work presents a comparative study of coatings produced via sol-gel basis on sintered glass particles in a borosilicate glass tube. The following catalytic systems were synthesized: TiO2-P25+SiO2, TiO2-P25+SiO2+Pt, TTIP, TTIP+Pt, TiOSO4+PEG, TiOSO4_30,6 wt%, TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+NH3, TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+NH4VO3, TiOSO4_30,6 wt%+TiO2-P25, and ZnO+TiOSO4_30,6 wt%. The advantage of sol-gel in catalyst preparation was exploited to combine catalyst to act as cocatalyst. Commercial obtainable TiO2-P25 widely applied in suspension systems was effectively immobilized on sintered glass support with the aid of tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) solution which acted as support material. The catalytic films had very good adherence on the sintered glass and the films retained a constant efficiency when reused after washing with water. The coatings were considerably well distributed all over the surface of the sintered glass. This is very promising for their potential use as immobilized catalyst in batch or flow reactor [31].The reactor design consisting of sintered glass with pore size between 150 and 250μm and glass particle grain size between 200 and 400 μm packed in a borosilicate tube placed between two planar dielectric barrier discharge lamps (osram planon) is reported for the first time. The advantages of the reactor design are as follows: a constant plug flow and therefore a narrow residence time distribution and good mixing condition with the sintered glass acting as static mixer. The broad surface of the light source insures incident light to be well distributed all over the surface of the glass tubes.A comparative study to access the degradation rate of the different coatings was done with MB. Illumination of uncoated glass material gave negligible changes in MB degradation after long irradiation time of 3 h. A fast decrease in MB concentration in the presence of UV light is observed. However, in the absence of UV light with coated glass material, a slight change in concentration close to 20% attributed to adsorption effects was observed. The effect of adding Pt as metal ion was monitored with TiO2-P25 and TTIP gels. TiO2-P25+SiO2, TiO2-P25+SiO2+Pt, and TiOSO4_30,6 wt% coatings showed highest degradation rates close to 100% after 90 min illumination with degradation rates exceeding 50% after 30 minutes. TTIP+Pt showed lowest degradation rates. New absorption peaks in the UV spectrum suggested the formation of intermediate products which disappeared in course of reaction indicating destruction of MB dye and intermediate products [21, 32, 33].



---

*Source: 614567-2013-10-28.xml*