# A New Conformable Fractional Derivative and Applications

Authors: Ahmed Kajouni; Ahmed Chafiki; Khalid Hilal; Mohamed Oukessou
Journal: International Journal of Differential Equations
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

This paper is motivated by some papers treating the fractional derivatives. We introduce a new definition of fractional derivative which obeys classical properties including linearity, product rule, quotient rule, power rule, chain rule, Rolle’s theorem, and the mean value theorem. The definitionDαft=limh⟶0ft+heα−1t−ft/h, for all t>0, and α∈0,1. If α=0, this definition coincides to the classical definition of the first order of the function f.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The objective of fractional calculus is to generalize traditional derivatives to noninteger orders, see [1–4]. As is well known, many dynamic systems are best characterized by a dynamic fractional-order model, generally based on the notion of differentiation or integration of noninteger order. The study of fractional order systems is more delicate than for their whole order counterparts. Indeed, fractional systems are, on the one hand, considered as memory systems, in particular to take into account the initial conditions, and on the other hand, they present a much more complex dynamic system.The theory of fractional derivative is a very old theory, which dates back to a conversation on September 30, 1695, between Hôpital and Leibniz concerning the definition of the operatordn/dxn for n=1/2. Thus, as the time progresses, certain approaches have been given in the literature such as the definition of Riemann–Liouville and that of Caputo.Recently, the authors in [5] and in [6] define new well-behaved simple fractional derivatives called the conformable fractional derivative depending just on the basic limit definition of the derivative.Khalil et al. [5] have introduced a new derivative called the conformable fractional derivative of f of order α and is defined by(1)Tαft=limε⟶0ft+εt1−α−ftε,for a function f:0,+∞⟶ℝ and 0<α≤1, and the fractional derivative at 0 is defined as fα0=limt⟶0+Tαft.They then defined the fractional derivative of higher order (i.e., of orderα>1). They also defined the fractional integral of order 0<α≤1 only. They then proved the product rule, and the fractional mean value theorem solved some (conformable) fractional differential equations where the fractional exponential function etα/α played an important rule.Katugampola introduced in [6] the new derivative which is defined by(2)Dαft=limε⟶0fteεt−α−ftε,for t>0, α∈0,1. If f is α differentiable in some 0,a,a>0, and limt⟶0+Dαft exists, then define(3)Dαf0=limt⟶0+Dαft.As a consequence of the above definitions, the authors in [5, 6] showed that the α derivatives obey the product rule and quotient rule and have results similar to Rolle’s theorem and the mean value theorem in classical calculus.The purpose of this work is to further generalize the results obtained in [5] and in [6] and introduce a new conformable fractional derivative as the most natural extension of the familiar limit definition of the derivative of a function f at a point.Remark 1.
Iff and Tαft or Dαft are differentiable, we have(4)ddtTαft=1−αt−αddtft+t1−αd2dt2ft,(for the derivative in [5]) and(5)ddtDαft=1−αt−αddtft+t1−αd2dt2ft,(for the derivative in [6]).
These expressions tends to infinity whent is very small, but this brings regularities in several mathematical problems especially when one seeks to bounded Tαft as well as these integer derivatives d/dtTαft, d2/dt2Tαft … (generalized function theory, for example).
This remark is the main motivation for our definition:(6)Dαft=limh⟶0ft+heα−1t−fth.


## 2. New Fractional Derivative

Definition 1.
Given a functionf:0,∞⟶ℝ, and then the conformable fractional derivative of f order α is defined by(7)Dαft=limh⟶0ft+heα−1t−fth,for all t>0, and α∈0,1.
Iff is α differentiable in some 0,a,a>0, and limt⟶0+Dαft exists, then define(8)Dαf0=limt⟶0+Dαft.Theorem 1.
If a functionf:0,+∞⟶ℝ and α differentiable at t0>0, then f is continuous at t0.Proof.
Sinceft0+heα−1t0−ft0=ft0+heα−1t0−ft0/h×h, then limh⟶0ft0+heα−1t0−ft0=limh⟶0ft0+heα−1t0−ft0/h×limh⟶0h.
Letε=heα−1t0. Then, limε⟶0ft0+ε−ft0=fαt0×0, which implies that limε⟶0ft0+ε=ft0.
Hence,f is continuous at t0.Theorem 2.
Let0<α≤1 and f,g be α differentiable at a point t>0. Then,(1)
Dαaf+bg=aDαf+bDαg, for all a, b∈ℝ.(2)
Dαtp=peα−1ttp−1 for all p∈ℝ.(3)
Dαλ=0, for all constant functions ft=λ.(4)
Dαfg=fDαg+gDαf.(5)
Dαf/g=fDαg+gDαf/g2.(6)
If in addition,f is differentiable, then Dαft=eα−1tf′t.Proof.
Parts (1) through (3) follow directly from the definition. We choose to prove (4) and (6) only since they are crucial. Now, for fixedt>0,(9)Dαfgt=limh⟶0ft+heα−1tgt+heα−1t−ftgth=limh⟶0ft+heα−1tgt+heα−1t−ftgt+heα−1t+ftgt+heα−1t−ftgth=limh⟶0ft+heα−1t−fthgt+heα−1t+ftlimh⟶0gt+heα−1t−gth=Dαftlimh⟶0gt+heα−1t+ftDαgt.
Sinceg is continuous at t then limh⟶0gt+heα−1t=gt. This completes the proof of part (4).
(5) can be proved in a similar way.
To prove (6), letε=heα−1t in Definition 1. and then h=εe1−αt. Therefore,(10)Dαft=limh⟶0ft+heα−1t−fthDαft=limε⟶0ft+ε−ftεe1−αtDαft=eα−1tlimε⟶0ft+ε−ftεDαft=eα−1tf′t.Theorem 3.
Letb,c,p∈ℝ and 0<α≤1. Then we have the following results:(1)
Dαtp=peα−1ttp−1 for all p∈ℝ.(2)
Dα1=0.(3)
Dαecx=ceα−1xecx, for all c∈ℝ.(4)
Dαsinbx=beα−1xcosbx, b∈ℝ.(5)
Dαcosbx=−beα−1xsinbx, b∈ℝ.Theorem 4.
However, it is worth noting the following conformable fractional derivatives of certain functions:(1)
Dαsin1/1−αe1−αt=cos1/1−αe1−αt.(2)
Dαcos1/1−αe1−αt=−sin1/1−αe1−αt.(3)
Dαe1/1−αe1−αt=e1/1−αe1−αt.(4)
Dα1/1−αe1−αt=1.Remark 2.
In the case of the derivative proposed in [5], we have the following remark: a function could be α differentiable at a point but not differentiable, for example, take ft=2t, then T1/2f0=limt⟶0+T1/2ft=1 where T1/2f0=1 for t>0. But T1f0 does not exist. This is not the case for the known classical fractional derivatives.
But for our definition, we have the same results of the classic case, and that is one more advantage of our derivative.
Next, we consider the possibility ofα∈n,n+1, for some n∈ℕ. We have the following definition.Definition 2.
Letα∈n,n+1, for some n∈ℕ, and f function be an n differentiable at t>0. Then the α fractional derivative of f is defined by(11)Dαft=limh⟶0fnt+heα−n−1t−fnth,if the limit exists.Remark 3.
As a direct consequence of Definition2, we can show that(12)Dαft=tα−nfn+1t,where α∈n,n+1 and f is n+1 differentiable at t>0.Remark 4.
The previous definitions of fractional derivative Riemann–Liouville and Caputo do not enable us to study the analysis ofα differentiable functions. However, our definition makes it possible to prove basic analysis theorems such as Rolle’s theorem and the mean value theorem.Theorem 5.
Rolle’s theorem for conformable fractional differentiable functions.
Leta>0 and f:a,b⟶ℝ be a given function that satisfies(1)
f is continuous on a,b,(2)
f is α-differentiable for some α∈0,1,(3)
fa=fb.
Then, there existsc∈a,b, such that fαc=0.Proof.
Sincef is continuous on a,b, and fa=fb, there is c∈a,b which is a point of local extrema. With no loss of generality, assume c is a point of local minimum. So(13)Dαfc=limε⟶0+fc+εc1−α−fcε=limε⟶0−fc+εc1−α−fcε.
But, the first limit is nonnegative, and the second limit is nonpositive.
Hencefαc=0.Theorem 6.
Mean value theorem for conformable fractional differentiable functions).
LetHTML translation failed and f:a,b⟶ℝ, be a given function that satisfies(1)
f is continuous on a,b,(2)
f is α-differentiable for some α∈0,1.
Then, there existsc∈a,b such that(14)fαc=fb−fa1/α−1eα−1b−1/α−1eα−1a.Proof.
Consider the function(15)gx=fx−fa−fb−fa1/1−αe1−αb−1/1−αe1−αa11−αe1−αx−11−αe1−αa.
Then,(16)ga=fa−fa−fb−fa1/1−αe1−αb−1/1−αe1−αa11−αe1−αa−11−αe1−αa=0,and(17)gb=fb−fa−fb−fa1/1−αe1−αb−1/1−αe1−αa11−αe1−αb−11−αe1−αa=0.
Thusga=gb. By Rolle’s theorem, there exists c∈a,b, such that gαc=0. Using the fact that Dα1/1−αe1−αt=1, the result follows.
Along the same lines in basic analysis, one can use the present mean value theorem to prove the following proposition.Proposition 1.
Letf:a,b⟶ℝ be α differentiable for some α∈0,1.(i)
Iffα is bounded on a,b, where a>0, then f is uniformly continuous on a,b, and hence, f is bounded.(ii)
Iffα is bounded on a,b and continuous at a, then f is uniformly continuous on a,b, and hence, f is bounded.


### 2.1. Fractional Integral

As in the work [5], it is interesting to note that, in spite of the variation of the definitions of the fractional derivatives, we can still adopt the same definition of the fractional integral here due to the fact that we obtained similar results in Theorem 4 as of the results (1)–(6) and (i)–(iii) in [5]. So, we have the following definition.Definition 3.
Letα∈0,1 and a≥0, let f be a function defined on a,t, Then, the α fractional integral of f is defined by(18)Iαaft=∫ate1−αsfsds.Theorem 7.
Iff:a,∞⟶ℝ is any continuous function in the domain of Iα and 0<α≤1. Then, for t>a, we have(19)DaαIαaft=ft.Proof.
Sincef is continuous, then Iαaft is clearly differentiable. Hence,(20)DaαIαaft=eα−1tddtIαaft.=eα−1tddt∫ate1−αsfsds.=eα−1te1−αtft.=ft.Lemma 1.
Letf:a,b⟶ℝ be the function differentiable and 0<α<1. Then, for t>a, we have(21)IαaDaαft=ft−fa.


### 2.2. Applications

The authors of [5] introduced a new definition of fractional derivative to facilitate the calculations performed to solve the differential equation proposed by Professor S. Momani(22)y1/2+y=x2+2Γ2.5x3/2;y0=0,but using the following approximation Γ2.5=1.33 to 1.Here we consider the following equation:(23)y1/2+y=x2+2xe−x/2;y0=0.Let us find a solutionyh of the homogeneous equation y1/2+y=0. We look for a solution of the form yh=e1−2ex/2. It is easy to verify that ypx=x2 is a particular solution of the nonhomogeneous equation.Now, the general solution isyx=yhx+ypx=ce1−2ex/2+x2 where c is a constant. Finally, the initial condition y(0) = 0 implies that c=0. Hence yx=x2.Example 1.
Based on the point (3) of Theorem4, one can easily see that the auxiliary equation for yα+y=0 is α−1r+1=0, so that the solution is given by yx=e1/1−αeα−1x.
The details of the solution of certain differential equations will be given later.Remark 5.
In the following example, we will show the benefit of the fractional derivative product rule which allows us to use the idea of the integrating factorExample 2.
Consider the following example:(24)y1/2+e−x/2y=xe−x.
By multiplying it byex, we obtain exy1/2+ex/2y=x and take advantage of the product rule for this fractional derivative (which is not possible with Riemann–Liouville and Caputo fractional derivatives): exy1/2=x.
By using the fractional integral (18), we have exy=∫0xtet/2dt+C.
Therefore,yx=2x−4e−x/2+ce−x.Example 3.
(25)y1/2=−y2−xyex/2.
Let us look for a differentiable solutiony which verifies this equation.
SinceDαyx=e1−αxy′x, then D1/2yx=y1/2x=e−x/2y′x.
Thus, the fractional differential equation (25) becomes(26)e−x/2y′x=−y2−xye−x/2,which brings back to(27)y′+y=−xy.
This is a differential equations of Bernouilli and can be solved easily.Example 4.
Consider now the fractional differential equation:(28)y1/2=y2+x2y+2x4x3ex/2.
As before, the fractional differential equation (28) gives(29)e−x/2y′=y2+x2y+2x4x3ex/2.
From where(30)x3y′+y2+x2y+2x4=0.
And this is a differential equation of Riccati.


## 2.1. Fractional Integral

As in the work [5], it is interesting to note that, in spite of the variation of the definitions of the fractional derivatives, we can still adopt the same definition of the fractional integral here due to the fact that we obtained similar results in Theorem 4 as of the results (1)–(6) and (i)–(iii) in [5]. So, we have the following definition.Definition 3.
Letα∈0,1 and a≥0, let f be a function defined on a,t, Then, the α fractional integral of f is defined by(18)Iαaft=∫ate1−αsfsds.Theorem 7.
Iff:a,∞⟶ℝ is any continuous function in the domain of Iα and 0<α≤1. Then, for t>a, we have(19)DaαIαaft=ft.Proof.
Sincef is continuous, then Iαaft is clearly differentiable. Hence,(20)DaαIαaft=eα−1tddtIαaft.=eα−1tddt∫ate1−αsfsds.=eα−1te1−αtft.=ft.Lemma 1.
Letf:a,b⟶ℝ be the function differentiable and 0<α<1. Then, for t>a, we have(21)IαaDaαft=ft−fa.


## 2.2. Applications

The authors of [5] introduced a new definition of fractional derivative to facilitate the calculations performed to solve the differential equation proposed by Professor S. Momani(22)y1/2+y=x2+2Γ2.5x3/2;y0=0,but using the following approximation Γ2.5=1.33 to 1.Here we consider the following equation:(23)y1/2+y=x2+2xe−x/2;y0=0.Let us find a solutionyh of the homogeneous equation y1/2+y=0. We look for a solution of the form yh=e1−2ex/2. It is easy to verify that ypx=x2 is a particular solution of the nonhomogeneous equation.Now, the general solution isyx=yhx+ypx=ce1−2ex/2+x2 where c is a constant. Finally, the initial condition y(0) = 0 implies that c=0. Hence yx=x2.Example 1.
Based on the point (3) of Theorem4, one can easily see that the auxiliary equation for yα+y=0 is α−1r+1=0, so that the solution is given by yx=e1/1−αeα−1x.
The details of the solution of certain differential equations will be given later.Remark 5.
In the following example, we will show the benefit of the fractional derivative product rule which allows us to use the idea of the integrating factorExample 2.
Consider the following example:(24)y1/2+e−x/2y=xe−x.
By multiplying it byex, we obtain exy1/2+ex/2y=x and take advantage of the product rule for this fractional derivative (which is not possible with Riemann–Liouville and Caputo fractional derivatives): exy1/2=x.
By using the fractional integral (18), we have exy=∫0xtet/2dt+C.
Therefore,yx=2x−4e−x/2+ce−x.Example 3.
(25)y1/2=−y2−xyex/2.
Let us look for a differentiable solutiony which verifies this equation.
SinceDαyx=e1−αxy′x, then D1/2yx=y1/2x=e−x/2y′x.
Thus, the fractional differential equation (25) becomes(26)e−x/2y′x=−y2−xye−x/2,which brings back to(27)y′+y=−xy.
This is a differential equations of Bernouilli and can be solved easily.Example 4.
Consider now the fractional differential equation:(28)y1/2=y2+x2y+2x4x3ex/2.
As before, the fractional differential equation (28) gives(29)e−x/2y′=y2+x2y+2x4x3ex/2.
From where(30)x3y′+y2+x2y+2x4=0.
And this is a differential equation of Riccati.



---

*Source: 6245435-2021-11-26.xml*