# Miniaturization of a Microstrip Patch Antenna with a Koch Fractal Contour Using a Social Spider Algorithm to Optimize Shorting Post Position and Inset Feeding

Authors: Eduardo A. M. Souza; Phelipe S. Oliveira; Adaildo G. D’Assunção; Laércio M. Mendonça; Custódio Peixeiro
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

This paper presents a social spider optimization (SSO) design of a small-size microstrip antenna. Two antenna miniaturization techniques, based on the use of a Koch fractal contour and a shorting post (connecting the patch to the ground plane), are combined to enable a major size reduction. The antenna is inset fed by a microstrip line. The developed SSO algorithm is used to find out the best radius and position of the shorting post and the length of the inset feed, to achieve the desired resonant frequency with good impedance matching. Antenna prototypes have been fabricated and measured. The good agreement obtained between numerical simulation and experimental results has validated the design procedure. Compared with a conventional rectangular patch, the antenna resonance frequency is reduced from 2.45 GHz to 730 MHz, which corresponds to a remarkable miniaturization of about 70%. The proposed antenna is suitable for applications in the 700-800 MHz frequency range, such as 4G mobile communication systems.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Over the past few years, there has been an increasing demand for more reliable wireless mobile communication systems and a consistent trend to increase the required transmission capacity. Another aspect observed in the past few years is a growing need for devices, systems, and equipment for voice and data communications with smaller size and weight [1–6]. As a result, there has been a need to keep studying and proposing new techniques for the miniaturization of microstrip antennas [7–30].Some of the required characteristics in antenna design for use in aircraft, spacecraft, and mobile wireless communication systems are reduced size and weight, low production cost, simplicity in the manufacturing process, flexible performance, ease of installation, mechanical robustness, printed circuit technology, and compatibility with monolithic microwave integrated circuits (MMIC). Microstrip antennas exhibit these advantageous features and, therefore, are suitable and widely used in communication system applications at the microwave and millimeter wave bands.Several techniques have been used in the miniaturization of microstrip patch antennas [7], such as material loading [8, 9], shorting and folding [10–14], reshaping [15–20], modifying the ground plane [21, 22], using metamaterials [23–25], and using fractal contours [26–30].Many bioinspired algorithms have been developed [31] and used to optimize different antenna geometries [32]. The most frequently used are neural networks [33, 34], genetic algorithms [34–36], and particle swarm optimization [37, 38].This paper proposes the use of a Koch fractal geometry [16–20, 26–30] combined with a shorting post [10–13] to provide a very significant reduction of the resonant frequency enabling the miniaturization of a microstrip patch antenna. The approach is focused on the optimization of the shorting post (position and radius) and inset feeding line (width and length) using a social spider optimization (SSO) algorithm, based on the collective behavior of spiders [39, 40].An antenna prototype has been fabricated and tested for comparison purposes. It is shown that, with the proposed technique, a small microstrip patch antenna can be designed to be used in the low frequency bands of the 4G mobile communication systems.


## 2. Antenna Configuration

This work proposes a single-layer microstrip antenna composed of a conducting patch with a Koch fractal contour and a single shorting post, to get reduction in size and weight for a specific resonance frequency.The Koch fractal is a self-similar fractal with iterative construction defined by the iteration numberk, also called the fractal level, and the iteration factor d. It is classified as a deterministic geometry composed of several copies of itself. As shown in Figure 1(a), the initiator is a rectangular microstrip patch antenna with width W and length L. The initiator is also known as a Koch fractal patch of level k=0. The Koch (loop) fractal generation process is started by replacing the upper, lower, left, and right sides of the initiator by those defined by the fractal generator, as shown in Figure 1(b), being called the Koch fractal patch of level k=1. Fractal iteration factors dL=1/3 (in length) and dW=1/3 (in width) are used, resulting in W1=W/3 and L1=L/3.Figure 1
Microstrip patch antenna with (a) Koch fractal contour of levelk=0 (initiator), (b) Koch fractal contour of level k=1, and (c) Koch fractal contour of level k=2.
(a)
(b)
(c)In order to get further resonance frequency reduction, the upper, lower, left, and right sides of the Koch fractal patch of levelk=1 are replaced by those defined by the fractal generator, as shown in Figure 1(c), being called the Koch fractal patch of level k=2, where W2=W1/3 and L2=L1/3.A shorting post connecting the conducting patch to the ground plane is used (as shown in Figure2) to get an additional reduction of the antenna resonance frequency, enabling further miniaturization. The shorting post radius is Rs, and its position is (xs, ys), as also shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
Microstrip patch antenna with Koch fractal contour of levelk=2 and the shorting post.The proposed antenna is inset fed by a microstrip line with inset widthX0 and length Y0, for an impedance matching purpose. An SMA connector is connected (soldered) to the microstrip line and a 50 Ω coaxial cable is connected to the SMA connector. Both are used to excite the antenna.The ground plane dimensions of the antenna areWGP and LGP. The dielectric substrate is FR4, with relative permittivity εr=4.4, loss tangent tanδ=0.02, and thickness h=1.5 mm.Particularly, the position and diameter of the shorting post (SP) directly affect the resonance frequency reduction. Similarly, the antenna reflection coefficient is directly affected by the width and length of the inset in the microstrip feed line.To determine the best shorting post radius,Rs, and position, (xs, ys), and the inset width, X0, and length, Y0, a social spider optimization (SSO) algorithm has been developed.


## 3. Social Spider Algorithm Optimization

Recently, a new optimization algorithm has been proposed for a bandstop Vicsek fractal frequency selective surface and a planar monopole antenna design [40]. This optimization technique, introduced in [39] and called social spider optimization (SSO), has been inspired in the social behavior of male and female spiders, to improve the avoidance of premature convergence in the optimization process.In this work, the SSO technique is used in the design of a compact microstrip patch antenna with a fractal contour and a shorting post (Figure2). Each spider represents a set of values for the shorting post radius Rs and position (xs, ys) and inset of the microstrip feed line width X0 and length Y0. In this case, to keep the symmetry of the antenna structure and radiation pattern, xs=0 is imposed. These antenna dimensions are randomly defined in their variation intervals and directly used in the Ansoft HFSS software tool to obtain the antenna resonant frequency, fr, and reflection coefficient, S11, values, to be used in the SSO algorithm. The proposed SSO algorithm does not require storage of large amounts of data or the use of interpolation techniques enabling the development of efficient and accurate antenna analysis. A detailed description of the proposed SSO algorithm is included in [40].The first step in the SSO analysis is the generation of the initial population. In the second step, a fitness function is used to compute the spider proximity of the optimal solution. Depending on the distance, the spider receives a weight that indicates the quality of the solution. This weight is computed using the values of the antenna resonant frequency,fr, and reflection coefficient, S11. Each spider receives a calculated value according to its weight, and this value takes into account a portion of 70% of fr and 30% of S11. In the third step, all the spiders are checked to determine if the desired values for fr and S11 were achieved. In the affirmative case, the algorithm execution is stopped; otherwise, the positions of male and female spiders are changed, and the algorithm execution continues [39, 40].In the fourth step, the way the spiders’ positions are changed depends on their sexes. Basically, female spiders are attracted or repulsed by other spiders, determining and distinguishing their solution quality. Male spiders are classified as dominant and nondominant, according to their weight or quality of the solution [39].The fifth and last step in the SSO technique is the mating operation, followed by an evaluation of all the spiders and the beginning of a new cycle. The execution of the algorithm continues until a spider reaches a particular position in the web, i.e., finds adequate values forX0, Y0, ys, and Rs to achieve the desired values for the antenna resonant frequency, fr and input reflection coefficient, S11. The specific fitness function used is
(1)ffitness=fr−fgoalfgoal,iffr≠fgoal,10S112,iffr=fgoal,where fgoal is the required resonance frequency and S11 is the input reflection coefficient (in dB) at the frequency fgoal. In this case, the goals are fgoal=730 MHz and S11≤−10 dB.In this specific geometry, only 4 parameters have been considered for optimization (X0, Y0, ys, and Rs); however, in general terms, the more complex the problem is (more optimization variables), the more advantageous would the SSO algorithm be.


## 4. Results and Discussion

Figure3 shows simulation results for the S11 frequency behavior of rectangular patch microstrip antennas with Koch fractal geometries of levels k=1 and k=2, without the shorting post, as shown in Figures 1(b) and 1(c). Simulation results for the S11 frequency behavior of the initial rectangular patch (corresponding to the fractal level k=0) are also included for reference. The dimensions of the initiator, shown in Figure 1(a), are L=29.09 mm, W=37.34 mm, LGP=47.47 mm, WGP=57.34 mm, WTL=2.87 mm, X0=2.87 mm, and Y0=7.84 mm. These initial values have been chosen to provide a good impedance matching to a 50-Ohm microstrip line at 2.45 GHz. These dimensions are the same for the fractal geometries of levels k=1 and k=2, corresponding to Figures 1(b) and 1(c).Figure 3
Simulation results for the reflection coefficient of the Koch fractal antennas of levelsk=0 (initiator), k=1, and k=2, without the shorting post.The use of Koch fractal geometries decreases the resonance frequency enabling a significant size reduction of the antenna. The obtained resonance frequencies, for the microstrip antennas shown in Figures1(a)–1(c), are 2.45 GHz, 1.70 GHz, and 1.37 GHz, for Koch fractal levels k=0 (initiator), k=1, and k=2, respectively.The proposed Koch fractal patch antenna with the shorting post shown in Figure2 is investigated for further miniaturization. The analysis has been carried out through a combination of the developed social spider optimization (SSO) algorithm and Ansoft HFSS software, to simultaneously optimize the inset microstrip feed line width X0 and length Y0 (Figure 1(a)) and the antenna shorting post radius Rs and position ys. WTL=2.87 mm provides the required 50 Ohm characteristic impedance for the microstrip feed line.The results shown in Figure4 correspond to the antenna geometry shown in Figure 2 with the shorting post (radius Rs and position ys) and inset of the feeding transmission line dimensions (width X0 and length Y0) calculated by the developed social spider optimization (SSO) algorithm. The obtained antenna dimensions are Rs=0.04 mm, ys=−4.835 mm, X0=3.805 mm, and Y0=8.71 mm. The other antenna structural parameters are the same as the ones used to get the results shown in Figure 3. The obtained resonance frequencies, for the fractal patch antenna without and with the shorting post, are 1.37 GHz and 730 MHz, respectively.Figure 4
Simulation results for the reflection coefficient of Koch fractal antenna of levelk=2, without and with the shorting post.When compared with the initial common rectangular patch, the optimized patch of fractal level 2 with the shorting post presents a reduction of 70.2% in resonance frequency, 41.7% in impedance bandwidth, and 81.2% in radiation efficiency. Gain follows the radiation efficiency reduction rate.The optimized antenna with the Koch fractal levelk=2 contour and the shorting post has been fabricated using conventional printing circuit technology. Photographs of the antenna prototype and anechoic chamber measurement setup are shown in Figure 5.Figure 5
Photographs of the proposed antenna alone (a) and in an anechoic chamber measurement setup (b).
(a)
(b)The numerical simulations have shown that the optimal solution with the integration of the shorting post led to a significant reduction of the antenna resonant frequency provided by the sole use of the Koch fractal geometry of levelk=2.As a consequence of the miniaturization process, the bandwidth and efficiency of the patch have been decreased. This is a well-known and well-documented option [7, 41]. Table 1 contains first resonance frequency, impedance bandwidth (defined for a magnitude of S11 equal to -10 dB), and radiation efficiency results.Table 1
Comparison of resonance frequency, bandwidth, and radiation efficiency simulation results.
Resonance frequency (GHz)
Bandwidth (%)
Radiation efficiency (%)
Patch without the shorting post (fractal level 0)
2.45
2.35
58.6
Patch without the shorting post (fractal level 1)
1.70
1.78
27.4
Patch without the shorting post (fractal level 2)
1.37
1.77
14.8
Patch with the shorting post (fractal level 2)
0.73
1.37
11.0Apart from bandwidth, the characteristics of the miniaturized antenna are adequate for application in 4G mobile communication devices. Bandwidth can be enhanced using several techniques [42], such as substrate topology [43] and/or stacked patches [44].Figure6 shows a comparison between simulation and experimental results for the reflection coefficient. A good agreement is observed. As already pointed out, the simulation results have been obtained with the Ansoft HFSS software tool. The antenna simulation and measured resonance frequency results are 730 MHz and 744 MHz, respectively, which corresponds to just 1.9% difference.Figure 6
Reflection coefficient simulation and experimental results of the SSO optimized Koch fractal antenna.Figure7 shows simulation and experimental results for the E-plane (yz plane) and H-plane (xz plane) radiation pattern cuts of the proposed Koch fractal antenna of level k=2 with a shorting post, at 744 MHz. Measurements have been made in an anechoic chamber environment. A reasonable good agreement is obtained between simulation and experimental results. The shadowing effect of the positioner where the antenna is mounted can be observed in the experimental results for the angular range 180±30 degrees.Figure 7
Radiation pattern simulation and experimental results of the SSO optimized Koch fractal antenna at 744 MHz.
(a)
(b)Moreover, significant discrepancy can be noticed in theE-plane in the angular range 210-270 degrees and almost everywhere in the H-plane. These discrepancies are mostly caused by the poor performance of the anechoic chamber, which is specified to be used above 2 GHz. The reflectivity of the absorbing material (for oblique incidence) used in the anechoic chamber is only about –16 dB at 744 MHz, in contrast with the -30 dB obtained at 2 GHz. Due to the small ground plane size [45], the spurious radiation of the coaxial feed cable could also contribute to the above-mentioned discrepancy. However, the tests made with ferrite chokes [46] have shown that the influence of the coaxial feed currents is not meaningful.


## 5. Sensitivity Analysis

To illustrate the complexity of the developed optimization process, the antenna resonant frequency,fr, and reflection coefficient, S11, dependences on the independent variables Rs, ys, X0, and Y0 are shown in Figures 8–11, for four particular cases around the SSO obtained values. In each case, three of the antenna dimensions are fixed, and the fourth one is varied. The following antenna structural parameters are used in all the four cases: W=29.09 mm, L=37.34 mm, WGP=57.34 mm, LGP=47.47 mm, WTL=2.87 mm, and xs=0 mm.Figure 8
Simulation results for the resonant frequency dependence of the shorting post locationys for the Koch fractal antenna of level k=2.Figure 9
Simulation results for the resonant frequency dependence of the shorting post radiusRs for the Koch fractal antenna of level k=2.Figure 10
Simulation results for the reflection coefficient dependence of the inset feed lengthY0, for the Koch fractal antenna of level k=2 with the shorting post.Figure 11
Simulation results for the reflection coefficient dependence of the inset feed widthX0, for the Koch fractal antenna of level k=2 with the shorting post.The resonant frequency dependences of the shorting post locationys and radius Rs are illustrated in Figures 8 and 9, respectively.Figure8 shows a strong dependence of the resonant frequency on the shorting post location, ys, indicating an increasing antenna miniaturization ability for increasing values of the distance ys. Similarly, Figure 9 shows a strong dependence of the resonant frequency on the shorting post radius, Rs. However, in this case, the antenna miniaturization ability increases for decreasing values of Rs. Rs=0.04 mm has been chosen as it was the smaller value that could be implemented.Figures10 and 11 show, respectively, the dependence of the reflection coefficient S11 at 730 MHz, on the inset feed length Y0 and width X0, indicating the impedance matching ability of the miniaturized antenna with the shorting post.It is important to point out that the optimal value of a parameter depends on the stop criteria used in the SSO algorithm. As it can be seen in Figures10 and 11, there are values of X0 and Y0 that lead to lower values of S11 than the ones obtained with the SSO process.


## 6. Comparison with a PSO Algorithm

This section provides a convergence rate comparison with another global optimization method, the particle swarm optimization (PSO) [37], for the specific problem under optimization. As shown in Figure 12, the SSO algorithm is significantly better, as it reaches convergence at iteration 32 whereas for the PSO 39, iterations are needed. For a fair comparison, the same population size (12) has been used in both methods.Figure 12
Comparison of the convergence of SSO and PSO algorithms.The computational effort of the two methods is quite similar. The calculation time in a workstation with an Intel Xeon E5506 2.13 GHz processor and 24 GB of RAM is about 40 minutes for each generation of 12 individuals. Only about 2% of this computation time is used directly by the optimization algorithm; the remaining 98% is used by HFSS.


## 7. Conclusion

A compact microstrip antenna has been optimized using a social spider optimization (SSO) algorithm. The microstrip antenna is composed of a conducting patch with Koch fractal shape and a shorting post. An optimization technique based on an SSO algorithm is used to obtain the position and radius of the shorting post and the inset feed length and width. The use of the fractal geometry in conjunction with the shorting post resulted in a substantial size reduction when compared with other miniaturization techniques. The provided antenna miniaturization is about 70% in comparison with the size of the initial rectangular patch geometry. An antenna prototype has been fabricated and tested to proof the proposed concept. The good agreement obtained between numerical simulation and experimental results has validated the design procedure. The miniaturized antenna is suitable for operation in the 700-800 MHz frequency range, being a good candidate for applications in the low frequency bands of 4G mobile communication systems.



---

*Source: 6284830-2019-05-02.xml*