# Adult Patients’ Satisfaction with Inpatient Nursing Care and Associated Factors in an Ethiopian Referral Hospital, Northeast, Ethiopia

Authors: Kokeb Haile Eyasu; Akilew Awoke Adane; Fisseha Zewdu Amdie; Tesfaye Bisenebit Getahun; Mulunesh Abuhay Biwota
Journal: Advances in Nursing
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

Introduction. Patient satisfaction with nursing care is considered as an important factor in explaining patients’ perceptions of service quality. Care assessed to be high quality according to clinical, economic, or other provider-defined criteria is far from ideal if as a result of that care the patient is unhappy or dissatisfied.Objective. The aim of this study was to assess adult patients’ satisfaction with inpatient nursing care and associated factors in Dessie Referral Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia.Methods. Institution based quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted among patients admitted in medical, surgical, orthopedics, gynecology, and ophthalmology wards of the hospital from March 24 to April 30, 2013. All admitted patients who stayed in the study wards for at least two days during the data collection time were interviewed. Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scale questionnaire was used to collect the data and was analyzed using SPSS version 20. Odds ratios with their 95% confidence intervals and p values in a multiple logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with patient satisfaction with nursing care.Result. The overall patient satisfaction was 52.5%. Respondents’ sex, age, admission ward, self-reported health status, and class of admission were the variables significantly associated with patient satisfaction with nursing care.Conclusion and Recommendation. The rate of patient satisfaction with nursing care was found to be low in this study. Being female, younger age group (18–30 years), good self-reported current health status, being admitted in ophthalmology ward, and first class of admission were significantly associated with better patient satisfaction with nursing care. In-service training programs for nurses, with special emphasis on communication skills, are recommended.


---

## Body

## 1. Background

Healthcare situation is fast changing globally. Patient satisfaction is one of the established standards to evaluate achievement of the services being provided in the hospitals. For healthcare organization to be successful monitored clients view is a simple but important approach to assess and improve their performance [1].Patient satisfaction can be described as a healthcare recipient’s reaction to several aspects of their service experience. It is related to perception of the outcome of care and the extent to which it meets patient expectations. Patients thereby evaluate the healthcare services as well as the providers from their own subjective point of view [2, 3]. Conceptually, patient satisfaction has been defined as patient’s judgment on the quality and goodness of care [4]. Consequently, a dissatisfied patient is not considered psychologically or socially well and thus the goal of nursing has not been attained [2, 5].Patient satisfaction deserves attention not only because it is basically valuable goal, but also because it is a potentially important mediator for a variety of essential outcomes. Satisfied patients may be more adhered with their treatment, suggesting that satisfaction is an important component in promoting health and well-being. Satisfaction may also directly affect the economical capability of an institution by affecting consumer choice of health institution [6]. Satisfaction with care has a vital power determining whether a person seeks medical advice, complies with treatment, and maintains a continuing relationship with healthcare providers [5, 7].Of all the healthcare workers, nurses spend much time with the patients. Therefore, the nurse is in a unique position to influence and promote effective consumer relationships [8]. Patient satisfaction with nursing care is considered an important factor in explaining patients’ perceptions of service quality [5]. Measurement of patient satisfaction with inpatient care appears to be more important, because the interaction of patient and nursing staff is high in the ward setting and the illness itself affects the attention of nurses [9].Although patient satisfaction with nursing care is widely searched in the developed countries, lack of studies made it difficult to find research examining patients’ satisfaction with nursing care in developing countries such as Ethiopia [5]. Thus, in this study, patient’s satisfaction with nursing care and associated factors has been assessed in referral hospital, Northeast Ethiopia.


## 2. Methods

### 2.1. Study Setting and Participants

An institution based cross-sectional study was conducted, from March 24 to April 30, 2013, in Dessie Referral Hospital, Dessie City, Northeast Ethiopia. The hospital has a total of 200 beds; 136 were in adult medical, surgical, orthopedics, gynecology, and ophthalmology wards. There were 6,787 total admitted patients in 2011 and the hospital has 88 nursing staff (15 B.S. nurses and 73 diploma nurses).


### 2.2. Sample Size and Sampling Procedure

It was assumed that the precision to an acceptable approximation of the population has been taken to be 95% with a difference of no more than 5% from the actual figures in the source population. Sample size was determined by using single population proportion formula and considering 67% of overall satisfaction rate from a cross-sectional study done in Addis Ababa [5] and adding 10% possible nonresponse rate during the actual data collection makes the final sample size 374. But by taking the patient flow in the previous three consecutive months before the study period it was found that on average 400 patients were admitted per month so it was decided to take all admitted patients in the study period.


### 2.3. Data Collection Procedure

After two days’ training, a health officer as supervisor and four grade 12 completed individuals as data collectors were participated in the data collection process. The study participants were asked whether they are able to differentiate nursing staff from other health professionals. If not, the data collectors explained the nurses uniform and the activities of nursing staffs to the participants, to help them to differentiate the nursing staffs before interview.Data were collected by face to face interviewing using adapted standard questionnaire, Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scale (NSNS). The NSNS is designed principally to detect differences between wards (hospitals) and patient groups with respect to overall experience of satisfaction with nursing care [10, 11].The questionnaire had three parts; the first about sociodemographic characteristics of the participants, the second satisfaction with nursing care, and the third part about factors associated with patient satisfaction with nursing care. There were 19 items to determine the patients’ satisfaction with nursing care under the model. Each item was rated using a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from “1” (not at all satisfied), “2” (barely satisfied), “3” (quite satisfied), “4” (very satisfied), and “5” (completely satisfied). The total score was summed and transformed to yield an overall “satisfaction score” of 0 to 100, where 100 denotes complete satisfaction or highest level of satisfaction with all aspects of nursing care [10].The English version questionnaire was translated to local language (Amharic) and then back to English by language experts to confirm the consistency of translation.


### 2.4. Data Processing and Analysis

Data were checked for completeness, cleaned, coded, and entered into EPI-Info version 3.5.3 and then exported to SPSS version 20 for further analysis. Descriptive statistics were computed and bivariate analysis was used primarily to check which variables have association with the dependent variable. Then variables found to havep value of less than 0.2 were entered into multiple logistic regression for controlling the possible effect of confounders. Finally, variables which had statistically significant association were identified on the basis of odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).


### 2.5. Ethical Consideration

Before the field work ethical clearance was obtained from Department of Nursing, University of Gondar. Participation in the study was voluntary and responses of clients were anonymous. A letter of agreement was also attached to the questionnaire to obtain a written consent of each study subject. Participants were guaranteed confidentiality of the information collected; completed questionnaires were stored securely. Participants were also told that their nonparticipation would not have negative effect on their hospital care.


## 2.1. Study Setting and Participants

An institution based cross-sectional study was conducted, from March 24 to April 30, 2013, in Dessie Referral Hospital, Dessie City, Northeast Ethiopia. The hospital has a total of 200 beds; 136 were in adult medical, surgical, orthopedics, gynecology, and ophthalmology wards. There were 6,787 total admitted patients in 2011 and the hospital has 88 nursing staff (15 B.S. nurses and 73 diploma nurses).


## 2.2. Sample Size and Sampling Procedure

It was assumed that the precision to an acceptable approximation of the population has been taken to be 95% with a difference of no more than 5% from the actual figures in the source population. Sample size was determined by using single population proportion formula and considering 67% of overall satisfaction rate from a cross-sectional study done in Addis Ababa [5] and adding 10% possible nonresponse rate during the actual data collection makes the final sample size 374. But by taking the patient flow in the previous three consecutive months before the study period it was found that on average 400 patients were admitted per month so it was decided to take all admitted patients in the study period.


## 2.3. Data Collection Procedure

After two days’ training, a health officer as supervisor and four grade 12 completed individuals as data collectors were participated in the data collection process. The study participants were asked whether they are able to differentiate nursing staff from other health professionals. If not, the data collectors explained the nurses uniform and the activities of nursing staffs to the participants, to help them to differentiate the nursing staffs before interview.Data were collected by face to face interviewing using adapted standard questionnaire, Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scale (NSNS). The NSNS is designed principally to detect differences between wards (hospitals) and patient groups with respect to overall experience of satisfaction with nursing care [10, 11].The questionnaire had three parts; the first about sociodemographic characteristics of the participants, the second satisfaction with nursing care, and the third part about factors associated with patient satisfaction with nursing care. There were 19 items to determine the patients’ satisfaction with nursing care under the model. Each item was rated using a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from “1” (not at all satisfied), “2” (barely satisfied), “3” (quite satisfied), “4” (very satisfied), and “5” (completely satisfied). The total score was summed and transformed to yield an overall “satisfaction score” of 0 to 100, where 100 denotes complete satisfaction or highest level of satisfaction with all aspects of nursing care [10].The English version questionnaire was translated to local language (Amharic) and then back to English by language experts to confirm the consistency of translation.


## 2.4. Data Processing and Analysis

Data were checked for completeness, cleaned, coded, and entered into EPI-Info version 3.5.3 and then exported to SPSS version 20 for further analysis. Descriptive statistics were computed and bivariate analysis was used primarily to check which variables have association with the dependent variable. Then variables found to havep value of less than 0.2 were entered into multiple logistic regression for controlling the possible effect of confounders. Finally, variables which had statistically significant association were identified on the basis of odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).


## 2.5. Ethical Consideration

Before the field work ethical clearance was obtained from Department of Nursing, University of Gondar. Participation in the study was voluntary and responses of clients were anonymous. A letter of agreement was also attached to the questionnaire to obtain a written consent of each study subject. Participants were guaranteed confidentiality of the information collected; completed questionnaires were stored securely. Participants were also told that their nonparticipation would not have negative effect on their hospital care.


## 3. Result

### 3.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics of the Respondents

About half of (50.3%) study subjects were females and majority of the patients (62.9%) were married. The mean age of respondents was 38.67 years with SD 14.58. Similarly nearly half (48.4%) of them had no formal education, more than half (57.1%) were rural dwellers, and majority of them (65%) were Muslims. Regarding their occupation, a third (33.7%) of them were farmers (Table1).Table 1
Sociodemographic characteristics of study participants, Dessie Referral Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia (N
=
380).
Characteristics
Frequency
Percentages
Age (years)
18–30
142
37.4
31–40
113
29.7
41–50
54
14.2
51–60
31
8.2
≥61
40
10.5
Gender
Female
191
50.3
Religion
Orthodox
128
33.7
Muslim
247
65
Protestant
5
1.3
Residence
Rural
217
57.1
Urban
163
42.9
Marital status
Single
100
26.3
Married
239
62.9
Divorced
19
5.0
Widowed
22
5.8
Education
No formal education
184
48.4
Below 5th grade
45
11.8
5th–8th grade
94
24.7
9th–12th grade
29
7.6
Certificate and above
28
7.4
Occupation
Government employee
27
7.1
Nongovernmental employee
21
5.5
Farmer
128
33.7
Merchant
17
4.5
No job
160
42.1
Others
27
7.1
Income (birr/month)
150 and below
190
50
151–600
119
31.3
601–1200
51
13.4
1201 and above
20
5.3


### 3.2. Percentage Distribution of Study Participant’s Satisfaction with Nursing Care by Different Factors

The highest percentage of the study subjects were from medical ward (42.9%), followed by surgical ward (31.6%). The length of stay varied from 2 to 60 nights and large proportion of patients (95.5%) stayed in the ward for 2 to 7 nights. Majority of respondents (79.7%) were from second class of admission. Similarly, majority (91.3%) of patents had to pay for the service. Nearly half of respondents (48.2%) rated their current health status as good. About a quarter (23.4%) of respondents had another chronic illness in addition to current health condition and 54.2% of them responded as nurses were assigned for them (Table2).Table 2
Percentage distribution of study participant’s satisfaction with nursing care by different factors, Dessie Referral Hospital, Dessie, Northeast Ethiopia, April, 2013 (N
=
380).
Variables
Frequency
Percentages
Admission ward
Medical
163
42.9
Surgical
120
31.6
Orthopedics
28
7.4
Gynecology
43
11.3
Ophthalmology
26
6.8
Class of admission
First
78
20.3
Second
302
79.7
Having another disease/
chronic illness in
addition to current health problem
Yes
89
23.4
No
291
76.6
Length of stay (nights)
7–14 nights
344
90.5
8–15 nights
28
7.4
16–30 nights
3
0.8
31–60 nights
5
1.3
History of previous admission
Yes
102
29
No
245
71
Self-reported current health condition
Poor
216
56.8
Good
164
48.2
Payment for the service
Yes
347
91.3
No
33
8.7
Assigned nurse
Yes
206
54.2
No
102
31.6
Not sure
54
14.2


### 3.3. Adult Patients’ Satisfaction with Nursing Care

Of the total respondents only 52.5% of patients were found to be satisfied with the nursing care they have received. Furthermore, the amount of freedom on the ward (67%), nurses’ manner in going about their work (62.5%), nurses’ treatment of patients as an individual (59.7%), and the capabilities of nurses at their job (58.4%) were the four top scores whereas amount (46%) and type (45%) of information nurses gave to patients about their condition and treatment, the way nurses made patients feel at home (45%), and nurses’ awareness of patient’s needs (46%) were the least scores.


### 3.4. Factors Associated with Patient Satisfaction with Nursing Care

In bivariate analysis, sex, age, residence, educational status, marital status, admission ward, class of admission, payment for the service, self-reported current health condition, and occupation were factors significantly associated with patient satisfaction with nursing care.However, in the adjusted model, sex, age, self-reported current health condition, admission ward, and class of admission were found to be statistically significantly associated with patient satisfaction with nursing care.Female patients were about 2 times (AOR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.30, 3.73) more likely to be satisfied with the nursing care as compared to male patients. Patients within the age group of 18–30 years were almost 5 times (AOR = 4.77, 95% CI: 1.97, 11.55) more likely to be satisfied with the nursing care as compared to patients above the age of 61. Patients who were admitted in ophthalmology ward were about 10 times (AOR = 9.99, 95% CI: 3.47, 28.78) more likely to be satisfied as compared to patients admitted in medical ward. Patients admitted in the first class were also more likely (AOR = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.41, 4.67) to be satisfied as compared to patients admitted in the second class. In addition, patients who perceive their current health is in good condition were about 2 times (AOR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.27, 3.37) more likely to be satisfied as compared to those who perceive their current health status is in poor condition (Table3).Table 3
Bivariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with adult patients’ satisfaction with nursing care.
Variables
⁢Satisfaction
COR (95% CI)
AOR (95% CI)
Satisfied
Not satisfied
Sex
Male
64
125
1
1
Female
102
89
2.2 (1.48, 3.39)
2.20 (1.30, 3.73)∗
Age in years
18–30
87
55
3.7 (1.73, 7.86)
4.77 (1.97, 11.55)∗
31–40
40
73
1.28 (0.59, 2.79)
41–50
17
37
1.07 (0.44, 2.60)
51–60
10
21
1.11 (0.40, 3.05)
61 and above
12
28
1
1
Residence
Rural
86
131
1
∗
∗
Urban
80
83
1.47 (0.97, 2.21)
Educational status
Illiterate
73
111
1
∗
∗
Below 5th grade
20
25
1.22 (0.63, 2.35)
5th–8th grade
41
53
1.18 (0.71, 1.95)
9th–12th grade
13
16
1.24 (0.56, 2.72)
Certificate and above
19
9
3.21 (1.38, 7.48)
Marital status
Single
60
40
4.09 (1.84, 9.09)
∗
∗
Married
95
144
1.79 (0.86, 3.76)
Divorced or widowed
11
30
1
Occupation
Government employee
16
15
1
Nongovernmental employee
18
14
1.20 (0.45, 3.25)
∗
∗
Farmer
49
79
0.58 (0.26, 1.28)
Merchant
5
12
0.39 (0.11, 1.38)
Unemployed
78
94
0.77 (0.36, 1.67)
Admission ward
Medical
55
108
1
1
Surgical
56
64
1.72 (1.06, 2.79)
Orthopedics
13
15
1.70 (0.76, 3.83)
Gynecology
23
20
2.26 (1.14, 4.46)
Ophthalmology
19
7
5.33 (2.11, 13.45)
9.99 (3.46, 28.78)∗
Class of admission
First
47
13
2.33 (1.40, 3.88)
2.56 (1.41, 4.67)∗
Second
119
183
1
1
Self-reported health condition
Poor
78
138
1
1
Good
88
76
2.05 (1.35, 3.09)
2.07 (1.27, 3.37)∗
Payment for the service
Yes
148
199
1
No
18
15
1.61 (0.79, 3.31)
∗Statistically significant at p value ≤ 0.05
∗
∗Statistically not significant in backward stepwise logistic regression.


## 3.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics of the Respondents

About half of (50.3%) study subjects were females and majority of the patients (62.9%) were married. The mean age of respondents was 38.67 years with SD 14.58. Similarly nearly half (48.4%) of them had no formal education, more than half (57.1%) were rural dwellers, and majority of them (65%) were Muslims. Regarding their occupation, a third (33.7%) of them were farmers (Table1).Table 1
Sociodemographic characteristics of study participants, Dessie Referral Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia (N
=
380).
Characteristics
Frequency
Percentages
Age (years)
18–30
142
37.4
31–40
113
29.7
41–50
54
14.2
51–60
31
8.2
≥61
40
10.5
Gender
Female
191
50.3
Religion
Orthodox
128
33.7
Muslim
247
65
Protestant
5
1.3
Residence
Rural
217
57.1
Urban
163
42.9
Marital status
Single
100
26.3
Married
239
62.9
Divorced
19
5.0
Widowed
22
5.8
Education
No formal education
184
48.4
Below 5th grade
45
11.8
5th–8th grade
94
24.7
9th–12th grade
29
7.6
Certificate and above
28
7.4
Occupation
Government employee
27
7.1
Nongovernmental employee
21
5.5
Farmer
128
33.7
Merchant
17
4.5
No job
160
42.1
Others
27
7.1
Income (birr/month)
150 and below
190
50
151–600
119
31.3
601–1200
51
13.4
1201 and above
20
5.3


## 3.2. Percentage Distribution of Study Participant’s Satisfaction with Nursing Care by Different Factors

The highest percentage of the study subjects were from medical ward (42.9%), followed by surgical ward (31.6%). The length of stay varied from 2 to 60 nights and large proportion of patients (95.5%) stayed in the ward for 2 to 7 nights. Majority of respondents (79.7%) were from second class of admission. Similarly, majority (91.3%) of patents had to pay for the service. Nearly half of respondents (48.2%) rated their current health status as good. About a quarter (23.4%) of respondents had another chronic illness in addition to current health condition and 54.2% of them responded as nurses were assigned for them (Table2).Table 2
Percentage distribution of study participant’s satisfaction with nursing care by different factors, Dessie Referral Hospital, Dessie, Northeast Ethiopia, April, 2013 (N
=
380).
Variables
Frequency
Percentages
Admission ward
Medical
163
42.9
Surgical
120
31.6
Orthopedics
28
7.4
Gynecology
43
11.3
Ophthalmology
26
6.8
Class of admission
First
78
20.3
Second
302
79.7
Having another disease/
chronic illness in
addition to current health problem
Yes
89
23.4
No
291
76.6
Length of stay (nights)
7–14 nights
344
90.5
8–15 nights
28
7.4
16–30 nights
3
0.8
31–60 nights
5
1.3
History of previous admission
Yes
102
29
No
245
71
Self-reported current health condition
Poor
216
56.8
Good
164
48.2
Payment for the service
Yes
347
91.3
No
33
8.7
Assigned nurse
Yes
206
54.2
No
102
31.6
Not sure
54
14.2


## 3.3. Adult Patients’ Satisfaction with Nursing Care

Of the total respondents only 52.5% of patients were found to be satisfied with the nursing care they have received. Furthermore, the amount of freedom on the ward (67%), nurses’ manner in going about their work (62.5%), nurses’ treatment of patients as an individual (59.7%), and the capabilities of nurses at their job (58.4%) were the four top scores whereas amount (46%) and type (45%) of information nurses gave to patients about their condition and treatment, the way nurses made patients feel at home (45%), and nurses’ awareness of patient’s needs (46%) were the least scores.


## 3.4. Factors Associated with Patient Satisfaction with Nursing Care

In bivariate analysis, sex, age, residence, educational status, marital status, admission ward, class of admission, payment for the service, self-reported current health condition, and occupation were factors significantly associated with patient satisfaction with nursing care.However, in the adjusted model, sex, age, self-reported current health condition, admission ward, and class of admission were found to be statistically significantly associated with patient satisfaction with nursing care.Female patients were about 2 times (AOR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.30, 3.73) more likely to be satisfied with the nursing care as compared to male patients. Patients within the age group of 18–30 years were almost 5 times (AOR = 4.77, 95% CI: 1.97, 11.55) more likely to be satisfied with the nursing care as compared to patients above the age of 61. Patients who were admitted in ophthalmology ward were about 10 times (AOR = 9.99, 95% CI: 3.47, 28.78) more likely to be satisfied as compared to patients admitted in medical ward. Patients admitted in the first class were also more likely (AOR = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.41, 4.67) to be satisfied as compared to patients admitted in the second class. In addition, patients who perceive their current health is in good condition were about 2 times (AOR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.27, 3.37) more likely to be satisfied as compared to those who perceive their current health status is in poor condition (Table3).Table 3
Bivariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with adult patients’ satisfaction with nursing care.
Variables
⁢Satisfaction
COR (95% CI)
AOR (95% CI)
Satisfied
Not satisfied
Sex
Male
64
125
1
1
Female
102
89
2.2 (1.48, 3.39)
2.20 (1.30, 3.73)∗
Age in years
18–30
87
55
3.7 (1.73, 7.86)
4.77 (1.97, 11.55)∗
31–40
40
73
1.28 (0.59, 2.79)
41–50
17
37
1.07 (0.44, 2.60)
51–60
10
21
1.11 (0.40, 3.05)
61 and above
12
28
1
1
Residence
Rural
86
131
1
∗
∗
Urban
80
83
1.47 (0.97, 2.21)
Educational status
Illiterate
73
111
1
∗
∗
Below 5th grade
20
25
1.22 (0.63, 2.35)
5th–8th grade
41
53
1.18 (0.71, 1.95)
9th–12th grade
13
16
1.24 (0.56, 2.72)
Certificate and above
19
9
3.21 (1.38, 7.48)
Marital status
Single
60
40
4.09 (1.84, 9.09)
∗
∗
Married
95
144
1.79 (0.86, 3.76)
Divorced or widowed
11
30
1
Occupation
Government employee
16
15
1
Nongovernmental employee
18
14
1.20 (0.45, 3.25)
∗
∗
Farmer
49
79
0.58 (0.26, 1.28)
Merchant
5
12
0.39 (0.11, 1.38)
Unemployed
78
94
0.77 (0.36, 1.67)
Admission ward
Medical
55
108
1
1
Surgical
56
64
1.72 (1.06, 2.79)
Orthopedics
13
15
1.70 (0.76, 3.83)
Gynecology
23
20
2.26 (1.14, 4.46)
Ophthalmology
19
7
5.33 (2.11, 13.45)
9.99 (3.46, 28.78)∗
Class of admission
First
47
13
2.33 (1.40, 3.88)
2.56 (1.41, 4.67)∗
Second
119
183
1
1
Self-reported health condition
Poor
78
138
1
1
Good
88
76
2.05 (1.35, 3.09)
2.07 (1.27, 3.37)∗
Payment for the service
Yes
148
199
1
No
18
15
1.61 (0.79, 3.31)
∗Statistically significant at p value ≤ 0.05
∗
∗Statistically not significant in backward stepwise logistic regression.


## 4. Discussion

Nursing care is one of the major components of healthcare services. Hence, patients have the right to expect quality of nursing care. Nursing staff are the most numerous professional group and have the greatest contact with patients in comparison with physicians and other healthcare professionals. Therefore, they have significant chance to manipulate patients’ attitudes and behaviors’ in relation to their treatment, rehabilitation, and recovery process [5, 12].This study revealed that overall satisfaction with nursing care was 52.8%. This finding was lower than studies conducted in Addis Ababa which is 67% [5] and Malaysia 61.4% [13]. The possible explanation might be higher number of patients per ward and lower number of nursing staff in the current study as compared to the Addis Ababa study. The difference with Malaysia’s study might be due to the inclusiveness of our study; the current study includes medical ward which is usually believed to be the commonest ward with high patient dissatisfaction, while the Malaysia study focuses only on patients in orthopedics ward.The top aspects of care where patients scored the highest for their satisfaction with nursing care were the amount of freedom on the ward (67.2%), nurses’ manner in going about their work (62.5%), nurses’ treatment of patients as an individual (59.7%), and the capabilities of nurses at their job (58.4%) whereas amount and type of information nurses gave to patients about their condition and treatment (46.1%) and (44.9%), respectively, the way nurses made patients feel at home (45.2%), and nurses’ awareness of patients’ needs (45.9%) were the least scores. These findings are in line with finding of studies conducted in Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, and Addis Ababa [5, 9, 13, 14].This study revealed that female patients were about 2 times more likely to be satisfied with the nursing care as compared to male patients. This finding is consistent with studies done in Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Turkey, and Addis Ababa [5, 14–16]. The possible explanation might be that the majority of female patients level of education is lower than males, so their knowledge and expectation towards their needs, rights, and quality of nursing care might be lower than males.Patients in the age group of 18–30 years were 5 times more likely to be satisfied with the nursing care as compared to patients above the age of 6. This might be due to the increment of stressful situations like having chronic illness and being widowed in older age and also older patients might need support for their activity of daily living from nurses in relation to this expectation of care from nurses which might be higher in patients above the age of 60 than younger patients.Patients who were admitted in ophthalmology ward were about 10 times more likely to be satisfied as compared to patients admitted in medical ward. This finding is in line with a study done in Saudi Arabia and Jordan which revealed that those patients were admitted to “other departments” and marked their satisfaction higher than those admitted to either the medical or surgical departments [14, 15]. The probable explanation for these findings could be that those admitted to ophthalmology ward were able to take care of their activity of daily living and their expectation of care from nurses might be lower than those in medical ward. Whereas patients in medical ward are mostly admitted with more serious conditions, worse prognosis, and being highly exposed to stressful and anxious situation, their perception level might be influenced by “hallo effect” of these factors which made it low.Class of admission was also one of the factors significantly associated with satisfaction with nursing care. Patients admitted in the first class were 3 times more likely to be satisfied with the nursing care as compared to those in the second class. This finding is in agreement with study done in 12 European countries and Sri Lanka which revealed that better environment has favorable influence on patient satisfaction [9, 17]. This might be because the number of patients admitted at a time in the first class wards is not more than two and this gives different opportunities to the patient, like to have ease communication with nurses and that first class wards will not be crowded by visitors. This may have positive influence on their satisfaction.Patients with good self-rating health condition were 2 times more likely to be satisfied as compared to those who were in poor self-rating health status. Similar finding was also reported from three studies done in the USA and the UK which revealed that less sick patients who are in good self-rated health status were highly satisfied [18–21]. The reason for this finding might be due to the fact that having good self-rating health condition and prognosis may contribute to be in a good mood and furthermore their perception might be influenced by the hallo effect of the situation; the reverse might be true for patients whose current health status is in poor situation.Similar to different studies conducted on the same topic, this study also found out that the length of hospitalization was not significantly associated with adult patients’ satisfaction with nursing care (p
=
0.77) [5, 13, 16].


## 5. Conclusion

The proportion of patients satisfied with nursing care was found to be very low. The amount of freedom on the ward, nurses’ manner in going about their work, nurses’ treatment of patients as an individual, and the capabilities of nurses at their job were the four top scores whereas amount and type of information nurses gave to patients about their condition and treatment, the way nurses made patients feel at home, and nurses’ awareness of patients’ needs were the least scores.Being female, age group of 18–30 years, good self-reported current health status, being admitted in ophthalmology ward, and first class of admission were significantly associated with higher patient satisfaction with nursing care.



---

*Source: 6308617-2016-06-07.xml*