# Mechanical Response and Structure Optimization of Nanomodified Asphalt Pavement

Authors: Wenjun Gu; Yao Tian; Xuanyu Zhang
Journal: Advances in Civil Engineering
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

Nanomaterials are widely used in the preparation of modified asphalt because they can improve the high-temperature performance of matrix asphalt and have achieved good engineering results. However, the existing research mainly focuses on the material analysis and formula development of nanomodified asphalt and has not yet been involved in the mechanical response of the nanomodified asphalt pavement structure. The mechanical response contains the horizontal tensile stress and the vertical compressive stress of SiO2 modified asphalt pavement. It is unable to propose the matching pavement structure combination for the unique material characteristics of nanomodified asphalt, which leads to the increase of the possibility of pavement diseases and material waste. Hence, considering that semirigid base is the most widely used base type in China, two different structural models of nanomodified asphalt pavement are established according to the current specifications. The effects of pavement thickness, material type, and pavement design parameters on the mechanical response of nanomodified asphalt pavement are analyzed, and then the principle of optimal mechanical performance is taken and the optimal combination of nanomodified asphalt pavement structure is proposed.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In recent years, nanotechnology has been widely used in asphalt modification, which has obvious effect on improving the high-temperature performance of asphalt [1–5]. Caputo et al. introduced the properties of nanoparticles in an easy to review their use in bitumen and asphalt preparation and Silica, ceramic, clay, other oxides, and inorganic nanoparticles and discussed the framework of their use in bitumen and asphalt preparation for various scopes [6]. Li et al. found that the addition of nanomaterials could dramatically enhance the properties of an asphalt material such as viscoselasticity, high-temperature properties, and the resistances to aging, fatigue, and moisture [7]. Sun et al. studied improving base asphalt performance at both high temperature and low temperature in nanomaterials and polymers as composite modifiers to address the low-temperature performance of base asphalt binder [8]. Ma et al. droved TiO2 nanoparticles application into the pavement and present an experimental investigation of performances and automobile exhaust purification of asphalt and its mixture modified by nano-TiO2 [9]. Hu et al. formulated thermochromic hot-mixing asphalt (HMA) mixture by doping thermochromic powder and/or nano-TiO2 scatters at different concentrations into traditional asphalt mixture [10]. Hu et al. investigated the feasibility of TiO2 waterborne epoxy resin as fog seal and exhaust degradation material in the asphalt pavement by adding a commercial anatase/rutile mixed-phase nano-TiO2 [11]. Li et al. investigated the effects of surface-modified inorganic nanoparticle nano-ZnO on the physical and ultraviolet aging resistance of bitumen as well as the microstructures of the binders [12]. Karahancer et al. investigated a novel bitumen modification by aluminum oxide (Al2O3) nanoparticle, mixed with the bitumen in three percentages, to enhance the performance of bitumen and hot mix asphalt (HMA) [13]. Sarkar et al. improved the physical and mechanical properties of open-graded friction courses (OGFCs) by addicting the combination of nanosilica (NS) material and alkali resistant (AR) glass fiber [14]. Li et al. used two nanometer microwave absorbers named as carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and grapheme to improve the microwave heating and healing properties of bitumen under microwave irradiation [15]. Patchai Murugan et al. studied the proper blending methods to enhance the bitumen properties using both conventional and microwave heating methods by using NFC as bitumen modifier and the blending of NFC with bitumen [16]. Jeffry et al. produced nanocarbon from coconut shell ash (NCA) as bitumen modifier [17]. Akbari et al. investigated the fatigue response of hot mix asphalt (HMA) containing nanoclay and nanoalumina modified bitumen and its relationship with surface free energy (SFE) parameters [18]. Hussein et al. found good dispersion of the NCP within the bitumen matrix by XRD pattern and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) of the NCP-modified bitumen (NCPMB) [19]. Shi et al. analyzed the rheological properties of sixteen asphalts with different contents of nanosilica and Qingchuan rock asphalt by univariate analysis and variance analysis [20]. Ren et al. evaluated the influences of asphalt properties, temperature, and moisture damage on the Ad/Co of the asphalt, mastic, and mortar and investigated the relationships between the durability and indirect tensile strength (ITS) of the mixture and the Ad/Co of binder by indirect tensile tests and Cantabro loss tests [21]. Jiang et al. proposed a novel method to characterize distribution of mortar film thickness in asphalt mixture through image processing techniques [22].However, the existing research mainly focuses on the material analysis and formula development of nanomodified asphalt and has not been involved in the structural mechanics of nanomodified asphalt pavement [22–27]. In fact, because of the unique material characteristics of nanomodified asphalt, its mechanical role in pavement structure is bound to be quite different from that of traditional asphalt mixture [28–31]. It is necessary to carry out systematic mechanical analysis of pavement structure for nanomodified asphalt pavement and analyze the influence of material design parameters and pavement structure parameters on the mechanical response of nanomodified asphalt pavement. Thus, the pavement structure combination matching with nanomodified asphalt pavement is proposed, so as to prevent pavement diseases and material waste and improve the service quality of nanomodified asphalt pavement. Hence, considering that the semirigid base is the most widely used base type in China, two different structural models of nanomodified asphalt pavement are established according to the current specifications. The effects of pavement thickness, material type, and pavement design parameters on the mechanical response of nanomodified asphalt pavement are analyzed, and then the principle of optimal mechanical performance is taken and the optimal combination of nanomodified asphalt pavement structure is proposed.


## 2. Calculation Model

### 2.1. Pavement Structure and Calculation Index Selection

#### 2.1.1. Selection of Loads and Calculation Points

“Specifications for Design of Highway Asphalt Pavement (JTG D50-2017)” in China stipulates that the pavement structure design adopts a double-circle uniformly distributed vertical load as the effective load for calculation. The load circle radius is 10.65 cm, and the tire pressure is 0.707 MPa. The distribution of stress calculation points is shown in Figure1. In the XOY horizontal plane of Figure 1, the coordinates of point A are (0, −15.975), the coordinates of point B are (0, −5.325), the coordinates of point C are (0, 0), and the coordinates of point D are (0, −2.6625). Take the maximum value of point A, point B, point C, and point D for mechanical response analysis. Direction X is the driving direction.Figure 1
Compute point distribution.


#### 2.1.2. Design Index and Mechanical Response Position

According to 6.2.1 of the “Specifications for Design of Highway Asphalt Pavement (JTG D50-2017),” the design index of pavements with different structures is shown in Table1. At the same time, according to 6.2.2, the mechanical response and vertical position corresponding to each design index are shown in Table 2.Table 1
Design index of pavements with different structures.
Base typeSubbase typeDesign indexInorganic binder stabilizing typeInorganic binder stabilizing typeBottom layer tensile stress of inorganic binder stabilizing layer, permanent deformation of asphalt concrete layerGranule typeTable 2
The mechanical response corresponding to each design index and its vertical position.
Design indexMechanical responseVertical positionBottom layer tensile stress of inorganic binder stabilizing layerHorizontal tensile stress along the driving directionThe bottom of inorganic binder stabilizing layerPermanent deformation of asphalt concrete layerVertical compressive stressTop surface of each layer of asphalt concrete layer


### 2.2. Calculation of Nanomodified Asphalt Pavement Structure

To scientifically analyze the calculation results and reduce the amount of testing, this project uses the orthogonal test method to calculate and analyze the nanomodified asphalt pavement structure.According to the actual use of the arterial highways in China, two different working conditions are set: working condition I (surface layer of nanoasphalt mixture + bottom layer of SBS modified asphalt + semirigid base layer + semirigid subbase layer), and working condition II (surface layer of nanoasphalt mixture + bottom layer of SBS modified asphalt + semirigid base layer + the subbase layer of granules). By changing the thickness and modulus of different layers, the influences of pavement structure parameters on pavement mechanics response (see Table1) are used to provide a basis for pavement structure design and propose the recommended pavement structure combination form based on the principle of optimal mechanical response. The orthogonal tests of wording conditions I and II are shown in Tables 3 and 4, respectively.Table 3
Working condition I the orthogonal test design.
No.Surface layerBottom layerBase layerSubbase layerSoil foundationThickness (cm)Modulus (MPa)Thickness (cm)Modulus (MPa)Thickness (cm)Modulus (MPa)Thickness (cm)Modulus (MPa)Modulus (MPa)1-137310519,264309000157000501-239030719,2643611,500188500501-3310,750919,2644014,0002010,000501-447310519,2643611,5002010,000501-549030719,2644014,000157000501-6410,750919,264309000188500501-759030519,2643014,0001810,000501-8510,750719,264369000207000501-957310919,2644011,500158500501-10310,750519,2644011,500187000501-1137310719,2643014,000208500501-1239030919,2643690001510,000501-1349030519,264409000208500501-14410,750719,2643011,5001510,000501-1547310919,2643614,000187000501-16510,750519,2643614,000158500501-1757310719,2644090001810,000501-1859030919,2643011,50020700050Table 4
Working condition II the orthogonal test design.
No.Surface layerBottom layerBase layerSubbase layerSoil foundationThickness (cm)Modulus (MPa)Thickness (cm)Modulus (MPa)Thickness (cm)Modulus (MPa)Thickness (cm)Modulus (MPa)Modulus (MPa)2-137310519,26430900015200502-239030719,2643611,50018320502-3310,750919,2644014,00020440502-447310519,2643611,50020440502-549030719,2644014,00015200502-6410,750919,26430900018320502-759030519,2643014,00018440502-8510,750719,26436900020200502-957310919,2644011,50015320502-10310,750519,2644011,50018200502-1137310719,2643014,00020320502-1239030919,26436900015440502-1349030519,26440900020320502-14410,750719,2643011,50015440502-1547310919,2643614,00018200502-16510,750519,2643614,00015320502-1757310719,26440900018440502-1859030919,2643011,5002020050According to the Chinese standard “Specifications for Design of Highway Asphalt Pavement (JTG D50-2017),” the modulus of the SiO2-modified asphalt concrete with the nominal maximum particle size of 13.2 mm is 7310 MPa and that with the nominal maximum particle size of 16 mm is 10,750 MPa. Hence, the modulus of the surfer layer is selected as 7310 MPa, 9030 MPa (average value), and 10,750 MPa.


## 2.1. Pavement Structure and Calculation Index Selection

### 2.1.1. Selection of Loads and Calculation Points

“Specifications for Design of Highway Asphalt Pavement (JTG D50-2017)” in China stipulates that the pavement structure design adopts a double-circle uniformly distributed vertical load as the effective load for calculation. The load circle radius is 10.65 cm, and the tire pressure is 0.707 MPa. The distribution of stress calculation points is shown in Figure1. In the XOY horizontal plane of Figure 1, the coordinates of point A are (0, −15.975), the coordinates of point B are (0, −5.325), the coordinates of point C are (0, 0), and the coordinates of point D are (0, −2.6625). Take the maximum value of point A, point B, point C, and point D for mechanical response analysis. Direction X is the driving direction.Figure 1
Compute point distribution.


### 2.1.2. Design Index and Mechanical Response Position

According to 6.2.1 of the “Specifications for Design of Highway Asphalt Pavement (JTG D50-2017),” the design index of pavements with different structures is shown in Table1. At the same time, according to 6.2.2, the mechanical response and vertical position corresponding to each design index are shown in Table 2.Table 1
Design index of pavements with different structures.
Base typeSubbase typeDesign indexInorganic binder stabilizing typeInorganic binder stabilizing typeBottom layer tensile stress of inorganic binder stabilizing layer, permanent deformation of asphalt concrete layerGranule typeTable 2
The mechanical response corresponding to each design index and its vertical position.
Design indexMechanical responseVertical positionBottom layer tensile stress of inorganic binder stabilizing layerHorizontal tensile stress along the driving directionThe bottom of inorganic binder stabilizing layerPermanent deformation of asphalt concrete layerVertical compressive stressTop surface of each layer of asphalt concrete layer


## 2.1.1. Selection of Loads and Calculation Points

“Specifications for Design of Highway Asphalt Pavement (JTG D50-2017)” in China stipulates that the pavement structure design adopts a double-circle uniformly distributed vertical load as the effective load for calculation. The load circle radius is 10.65 cm, and the tire pressure is 0.707 MPa. The distribution of stress calculation points is shown in Figure1. In the XOY horizontal plane of Figure 1, the coordinates of point A are (0, −15.975), the coordinates of point B are (0, −5.325), the coordinates of point C are (0, 0), and the coordinates of point D are (0, −2.6625). Take the maximum value of point A, point B, point C, and point D for mechanical response analysis. Direction X is the driving direction.Figure 1
Compute point distribution.


## 2.1.2. Design Index and Mechanical Response Position

According to 6.2.1 of the “Specifications for Design of Highway Asphalt Pavement (JTG D50-2017),” the design index of pavements with different structures is shown in Table1. At the same time, according to 6.2.2, the mechanical response and vertical position corresponding to each design index are shown in Table 2.Table 1
Design index of pavements with different structures.
Base typeSubbase typeDesign indexInorganic binder stabilizing typeInorganic binder stabilizing typeBottom layer tensile stress of inorganic binder stabilizing layer, permanent deformation of asphalt concrete layerGranule typeTable 2
The mechanical response corresponding to each design index and its vertical position.
Design indexMechanical responseVertical positionBottom layer tensile stress of inorganic binder stabilizing layerHorizontal tensile stress along the driving directionThe bottom of inorganic binder stabilizing layerPermanent deformation of asphalt concrete layerVertical compressive stressTop surface of each layer of asphalt concrete layer


## 2.2. Calculation of Nanomodified Asphalt Pavement Structure

To scientifically analyze the calculation results and reduce the amount of testing, this project uses the orthogonal test method to calculate and analyze the nanomodified asphalt pavement structure.According to the actual use of the arterial highways in China, two different working conditions are set: working condition I (surface layer of nanoasphalt mixture + bottom layer of SBS modified asphalt + semirigid base layer + semirigid subbase layer), and working condition II (surface layer of nanoasphalt mixture + bottom layer of SBS modified asphalt + semirigid base layer + the subbase layer of granules). By changing the thickness and modulus of different layers, the influences of pavement structure parameters on pavement mechanics response (see Table1) are used to provide a basis for pavement structure design and propose the recommended pavement structure combination form based on the principle of optimal mechanical response. The orthogonal tests of wording conditions I and II are shown in Tables 3 and 4, respectively.Table 3
Working condition I the orthogonal test design.
No.Surface layerBottom layerBase layerSubbase layerSoil foundationThickness (cm)Modulus (MPa)Thickness (cm)Modulus (MPa)Thickness (cm)Modulus (MPa)Thickness (cm)Modulus (MPa)Modulus (MPa)1-137310519,264309000157000501-239030719,2643611,500188500501-3310,750919,2644014,0002010,000501-447310519,2643611,5002010,000501-549030719,2644014,000157000501-6410,750919,264309000188500501-759030519,2643014,0001810,000501-8510,750719,264369000207000501-957310919,2644011,500158500501-10310,750519,2644011,500187000501-1137310719,2643014,000208500501-1239030919,2643690001510,000501-1349030519,264409000208500501-14410,750719,2643011,5001510,000501-1547310919,2643614,000187000501-16510,750519,2643614,000158500501-1757310719,2644090001810,000501-1859030919,2643011,50020700050Table 4
Working condition II the orthogonal test design.
No.Surface layerBottom layerBase layerSubbase layerSoil foundationThickness (cm)Modulus (MPa)Thickness (cm)Modulus (MPa)Thickness (cm)Modulus (MPa)Thickness (cm)Modulus (MPa)Modulus (MPa)2-137310519,26430900015200502-239030719,2643611,50018320502-3310,750919,2644014,00020440502-447310519,2643611,50020440502-549030719,2644014,00015200502-6410,750919,26430900018320502-759030519,2643014,00018440502-8510,750719,26436900020200502-957310919,2644011,50015320502-10310,750519,2644011,50018200502-1137310719,2643014,00020320502-1239030919,26436900015440502-1349030519,26440900020320502-14410,750719,2643011,50015440502-1547310919,2643614,00018200502-16510,750519,2643614,00015320502-1757310719,26440900018440502-1859030919,2643011,5002020050According to the Chinese standard “Specifications for Design of Highway Asphalt Pavement (JTG D50-2017),” the modulus of the SiO2-modified asphalt concrete with the nominal maximum particle size of 13.2 mm is 7310 MPa and that with the nominal maximum particle size of 16 mm is 10,750 MPa. Hence, the modulus of the surfer layer is selected as 7310 MPa, 9030 MPa (average value), and 10,750 MPa.


## 3. Data and Discussion

The range histogram of working condition I is shown in Figure2. According to the structural combination of the semirigid base and the semirigid subbase, two control indicators, namely, the bottom layer tensile stress of the inorganic binder stabilizing layer and the permanent deformation of the asphalt concrete layer, are selected.Figure 2
Range diagram of working condition I. (a) Tensile stress at the bottom of inorganic binder base course. (b) Tensile stress of inorganic binder subbase. (c) Permanent deformation of asphalt concrete surface layer. (d) Permanent deformation of the lower layer of asphalt concrete layer.
(a)(b)(c)(d)Owing to the nano-SiO2 modified asphalt concrete, of which the modulus is tested via laboratory tests, being adopted in the surface layer, the modulus of the surface layer is not considered in this study. The modulus of other layers is selected in accordance with the Chinese standard “Specifications for Design of Highway Asphalt Pavement.”As shown in Figure2(a), the thickness of the lower layer and the modulus of the base layer have a significant effect on the bottom layer tensile stress of the inorganic binder stabilizing layer, followed by the thickness of the base layer. As shown in Figure 2(b), the modulus of the base layer and the modulus of the subbase layer have a greater influence on the bottom layer tensile stress of the inorganic binder stabilizing subbase layer, followed by the thickness of the base layer. As shown in Figure 2(c), the thickness of the surface layer has a significant effect on the permanent deformation of the asphalt concrete surface layer. As shown in Figure 2(d), the thickness of the surface layer has a significant effect on the permanent deformation of the underlying layer of asphalt concrete.Figure3(a) shows that, with the increase of the thickness of the underlying layer, the thickness of the base layer, and the modulus of the base layer, the bottom layer tensile stress of the inorganic binder stabilizing base layer decreases. The increase in the thickness of the underlying layer from 5 cm to 7 cm has a more significant effect on the bottom layer tensile stress of the inorganic binder stabilizing base layer than the increase in the thickness of the underlying layer from 7 cm to 9 cm. When the thickness of the base layer increases from 30 cm to 36 cm, the bottom layer tensile stress of the inorganic binder stabilizing base layer decreases slowly, and when the thickness of the base layer increases from 36 cm to 40 cm, the bottom layer tensile stress of the inorganic binder stabilizing base layer decreases relatively quickly. The modulus of the base layer has a more uniform effect on the bottom layer tensile stress of the inorganic binder stabilizing the base layer. As shown in Figure 3(b), as the modulus of the base layer increases, the bottom layer tensile stress of the inorganic binder stabilizing subbase layer first decreases and then increases. As the modulus of the base layer and the thickness of the base layer increase, the bottom layer tensile stress of the inorganic binder stabilizing subbase layer decreases accordingly. When the modulus of the base layer increases from 9000 to 11,500 MPa, the decrease in the bottom layer tensile stress of the inorganic binder stabilizing base layer is smaller than the increase in the bottom layer tensile stress of the inorganic binder stabilizing subbase layer when the modulus of the base layer increases from 9000 to 14,000 MPa. The modulus of the subbase layer increased from 7000 MPa to 8500 MPa, and the bottom layer tensile stress of the stabilizing subbase layer changed slowly. The thickness of the base layer has a more uniform effect on the bottom layer tensile stress of the inorganic binder stabilizing subbase layer. Figure 3(c) shows that, as the thickness of the surface layer increases, the permanent deformation of the surface layer of the asphalt concrete layer first decreases and then increases. Figure 3(d) shows that, as the thickness of the surface layer increases, the permanent deformation of the underlying layer of the asphalt concrete layer decreases uniformly.Figure 3
Trend chart of working condition I.In conclusion, combined with economic efficiency, the recommended pavement structure is as follows: surface layer thickness 4 cm + underlying layer thickness 7 cm + base layer thickness 36 cm + subbase layer thickness 15 cm. For the modulus of the base layer, the value should be medium to high, and for the modulus of the subbase layer, the value should be as high as possible, and for the modulus of the surface layer, the value should be as high as possible. The modulus of the surface layer can be flexibly selected according to the actual situation of the project. The range diagram of condition 2 is shown in Figure4.Figure 4
Range diagram of working condition II. (a) Bottom layer tensile stress of inorganic binder stabilizing layer. (b) Permanent deformation of asphalt concrete surface layer. (c) Permanent deformation of the lower layer of asphalt concrete layer.
(a)(b)(c)As shown in Figure4(a), the thickness of the base course has the greatest influence on the bottom tensile stress of the inorganic binder layer, the thickness of the lower layer and the modulus of the base course also have a significant influence on the bottom tensile stress of inorganic binder layer, and the other four control indexes have little influence on the bottom tensile stress of inorganic binder layer. As shown in Figure 4(b), there is little difference in the influence level of the three control indexes on the permanent deformation of the surface layer of the asphalt mixture layer. As shown in Figure 4(c), among the seven control indexes, the influence of surface layer thickness, lower layer thickness, and base modulus on the permanent deformation of the lower layer of asphalt mixture is more obvious.It can be seen from Figure5(a) that, with the increase of the thickness of the base course and the thickness of the lower layer, the tensile stress at the bottom of the inorganic binder stable layer decreases, but the influence of the thickness of the base course on the decreasing trend of the tensile stress at the bottom of the inorganic binder stable layer is more uniform, while the influence of the thickness of the lower layer on the decreasing trend of the tensile stress at the bottom of the inorganic binder stable layer is not uniform, when the thickness of the lower layer increases from 5 cm to 7 cm, the reduction rate of the tensile stress at the bottom of the stabilized layer of the inorganic binder is 1.843 times that when the thickness of the lower layer increases from 7 cm to 9 cm. The effect of increasing the thickness of the lower layer on the tensile stress at the bottom of the stabilized layer of the inorganic binder is higher than that when the thickness of the lower layer is 7–9 cm. With the increase of the base modulus, the tensile stress at the bottom of the inorganic binder stable layer increases and the influence of the base modulus on the decreasing trend of the tensile stress at the bottom of the inorganic binder stable layer is uniform. It can be seen from Figure 5(b) that, with the increase of surface layer thickness, surface layer modulus, and subbase modulus, the permanent deformation of asphalt mixture surface layer first decreases and then increases, while with the increase of lower layer thickness, base layer thickness, base layer modulus, and subbase thickness, it first increases and then decreases. Among them, the influence trend of the increase of the thickness of the lower layer and the modulus of the base layer on the permanent deformation of the surface layer of the asphalt mixture layer is more similar, both of which are in the first half of the influence degree which is greater, and the latter half has little influence. The influence trend of the increase of the thickness of the base layer and subbase layer on the permanent deformation of the surface layer of the asphalt mixture layer is more similar, both of which are in the first half of the influence degree which has little influence, and the latter half is greater. It can be seen from Figure 5(c) that, with the increase of the surface layer thickness in the pavement structure, the permanent deformation of the surface layer of the asphalt mixture layer gradually decreases, and, when the surface layer thickness increases from 3 m to 4 m, the reduction rate of permanent deformation of asphalt mixture surface layer is 130.29 times that when the surface layer thickness increases from 4 cm to 5 cm (the permanent deformation of asphalt mixture surface layer basically does not change when the surface layer thickness increases from 4 cm to 5 cm). The permanent deformation of the surface layer of the asphalt mixture layer increases gradually, and it increases rapidly in the first half and hardly changes in the second half. When the thickness of the lower layer increases from 5 m to 7 m, the increase rate of permanent deformation of the asphalt mixture surface layer is 3.35 times that of the surface layer from 7 cm to 9 cm. When the base modulus increases from 9000 MPa to 11,500 MPa, the increase rate of permanent deformation of the asphalt mixture surface layer is 5.77 times that when the base modulus increases from 11,500 MPa to 14,000 MPa. In conclusion, combined with economy, the recommended pavement structure is as follows: the thickness of the surface layer is 4 cm + the thickness of the lower layer is 5 cm + the thickness of the base layer is 40 cm + the thickness of the subbase layer is 20 cm, the modulus of the base layer should be low, and the modulus of subbase layer and surface layer can be flexibly selected according to the actual situation of the project.Figure 5
Trend chart of working condition II.
(a)(b)After analyzing Figures2 to 4, we see that, under different working conditions, the degree of influence of the seven control indicators on the corresponding design index is shown in Table 5.Table 5
The influence degree of control indicators.
Working conditionDesign indexThickness of surface layerSurface layer modulusLower layer thicknessBase thicknessBase modulusSubbase thicknessModulus of subbaseWorking condition ITensile stress at the bottom of inorganic binder stabilized layerThe basic level✔✔Subbase✔✔✔Permanent deformation of asphalt mixture layerSurface layer✔Lower layer✔Working condition IITensile stress at the bottom of inorganic binder stabilized layer—✔✔✔✔Permanent deformation of asphalt concrete layerSurface layer✔✔✔✔✔✔✔Lower layer✔✔✔After integrating the mechanical response analysis results and economic aspects, the recommended pavement structure under the two working conditions is shown in Table6.Table 6
Recommended pavement structure.
Working conditionThickness of surface layer (cm)Surface layer modulus (MPa)Lower layer thickness (cm)Base thickness (cm)Base modulus (MPa)Subbase thickness (cm)Modulus of subbase (MPa)Working condition I4Flexible736Medium high value15High valueWorking condition II4Flexible540Low value20Flexible


## 4. Conclusions

By changing different layer thickness and modulus, we can study the influence of the nanomodified asphalt pavement structure on pavement mechanics response and then propose the recommended pavement structure combination form of the nanomodified asphalt.The bottom layer tensile stress of the inorganic binder stabilizing subbase layer is greatly affected by the thickness of the underlying layer and the modulus of the base layer, followed by the thickness of the base layer. The bottom layer tensile stress of the inorganic binder stabilizing subbase layer is more greatly affected by the modulus of the base layer and the modulus of the subbase layer, followed by the thickness of the base layer. The thickness of the surface layer has a significant effect on the permanent deformation of the asphalt concrete surface layer, and with the increase of the thickness, the permanent deformation first decreases and then increases. The thickness of the surface layer has a significant effect on the permanent deformation of the underlying layer of asphalt concrete, and as the thickness of the surface layer increases, the permanent deformation decreases uniformly.Considering the economic aspect, the recommended pavement structure for working condition I is as follows: the thickness of the surface layer 4 cm + the thickness of the underlying layer 7 cm + the thickness of the base layer 36 cm + the thickness of the subbase layer 15 cm. For the modulus of the base layer, the value should be medium to high, for the modulus of the subbase layer, the value should be as high as possible, and the modulus of the surface layer can be flexibly selected according to the actual situation of the project. The recommended pavement structure for working condition II is as follows: the thickness of the surface layer 4 cm + the thickness of the underlying layer 5 cm + the thickness of the base layer 40 cm + the thickness of the subbase layer 20 cm. For the modulus of the base layer, the value should be low, and for the modulus of the subbase layer and surface layer, it can be flexibly selected according to the actual situation of the project.



---

*Source: 6286704-2021-08-26.xml*