# A Compact Wide-Band Hybrid Dielectric Resonator Antenna with Enhanced Gain and Low Cross-Polarization

Authors: Feibiao Dong; Limei Xu; Wenbin Lin; Tianhong Zhang
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

By loading two printed patches to the dielectric resonator antenna (DRA), a compact wide-band hybrid dielectric resonator antenna with enhanced gain and low cross-polarization is presented. The proposed antenna utilizes a combination of a rectangular dielectric resonator and two printed patches. Due to the hybrid design, multiple resonances were obtained. By adding two air layers between the dielectric resonator and the printed patches, the bandwidth has been significantly improved. Compared to the traditional hybrid dielectric resonator antenna, the proposed antenna can achieve wide bandwidth, high gain, low cross-polarization, and even small size simultaneously. The prototype of the proposed antenna has been fabricated and tested. The measured −10 dB return loss bandwidth is 25.6% (1.7–2.2 GHz). The measured antenna gains are about 6.3 and 8.2 dBi in the operating frequency band. Low cross-polarization levels of less than −28.5 dB and −43 dB in the E-plane and H-plane are achieved. Moreover, the overall dimensions of the antenna are only 67 × 67 × 34 (mm3). The proposed antenna is especially attractive for small base antenna applications.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

With the great development in wireless communication systems, their requirements have presented many challenges to the antenna community in terms of miniaturized size, wide bandwidth, improved radiation, and ease of fabrication and integration. For nearly two decades, both the microstrip antennas and the dielectric resonator antennas (DRAs) have been under investigation for modern communication systems; these antennas have many attractive features in terms of low profile, light weight, simple coupling, and ease of fabrication. The dielectric resonator antenna (DRA) has been under investigation over the past two decades and is now being introduced as good candidate for many wireless communication applications [1]. DRA offers many advantages of small size, simple coupling schemes, and high radiation efficiency. As it is known, conventional DRA usually suffers from a limited impedance bandwidth and low antenna gain [2]. DRA working in its fundamental mode radiates like a short dipole; it can achieve broadside radiation patterns with a maximum directivity of about 5 dB [3]. Substantial efforts have been made to enhance the bandwidth and gain of the DRA. Hybrid resonator antenna techniques [4–6] were proposed to widen the bandwidth of the DRA. The aperture coupled hybrid DRA can achieve wide bandwidth and satisfactory radiation patterns [4, 5]. In [6], the ultrawideband DRA is excited by a bevel-shaped patch with a coplanar waveguide fed ground. In [7], the proposed DR loaded patch antenna achieves significant reduction in dimensions, but the trade-offs are narrow bandwidth and degradation of the radiation patterns.Different feed mechanisms used to excite the DRA were proposed to enhance the bandwidth [8–11]. In [8], the MIMO rectangular DRA excited by coplanar waveguide and coaxial probe can achieve 47% and 25% impedance bandwidth for port 1 and port 2, respectively. By adopting the strip- and slot-fed excitation schemes, a dual-band and wide-band dual-polarized cylindrical DRA with high port isolation and stable radiation patterns was investigated in [9], but the dimensions of the cylindrical DRA are too large. In the design of [10], a compact dual-polarized DRA fed by a coplanar waveguide is presented. However, the bandwidth for both ports is narrow. In [11], a new wide-band switched line couple was used in the design of broadband circularly polarized DRA, resulting in a 3 dB axial ratio bandwidth of 47.69%.In [12], the authors presented a microstrip feed high aspect ratio DRA with wide bandwidth and miniaturized antenna structure. The main disadvantages of this method are being low in antenna gain and difficulty to design a dual-polarized DRA. Reshaping geometry of a DRA has also been used to widen the bandwidth [13, 14]. In [15], the authors first introduce TExδ01 in the hybrid DRA design. The proposed DRA has good broadside radiation patterns but with limited bandwidth and difficult fabrication.In this article, a compact wide-band DR loaded two-patch antenna is presented, comprising a rectangular coupling slot cut in the ground plane and a feeding line printed on the bottom layer of the grounded substrate. The aperture coupled DR acts as the primary radiator and is considered to resonate at the middle frequency. The parasitic metallic patches are supposed to resonate at the lower and higher frequencies, respectively, which can enhance the operating impedance bandwidth of the proposed antenna. A parametric study is performed to understand how the dimensions of the antenna affect the performances. Simulated and measured results show that the proposed antenna element is suitable for the base station antenna that is required to cover the working frequency band of DCS, PCS, and 3G mobile communication systems. Details of the proposed antenna are described, and obtained experimental results are presented and discussed.


## 2. Antenna Analysis and Design

The configuration of the proposed antenna is illustrated in Figure1. The antenna is composed of a rectangular DR, an upper square patch, a lower square patch, three layer substrates, and eight cylindrical posts. A rectangular DR has one more degree of freedom than cylindrical and spherical DRAs [17]. The DR is situated at the center of the ground plane and fed by a microstrip line through a rectangular slot etched in the ground plane; one end of the feed line is connected to an SMA connector, and the other end extends a stub length s beyond the center of the coupling slot. The DR has length a, width b, height h, and dielectric constant of εr=12. In order to make the antenna structure more stable, a metal frame with certain structure shown in Figure 1(c) is proposed. The grounded substrate is embedded in the metal frame. The two square patches with thickness of 0.035 mm are printed on two substrates, respectively, and the two substrates are supported and fixed to the surface of the metal frame by dielectric posts (made of Teflon with relative permittivity of 2.08). The three layer substrates used above are made of FR4 with relative permittivity of 3.38 and a loss tangent of 0.0037. The key parameters of the antenna are optimized for good performance, and the final dimensions are chosen as follows: Lg=67 mm, Lp=65 mm, L1=57 mm, L2=10 mm, Wp=44 mm, Ls=20 mm, Ws=4 mm, Wf=3.6 mm, Hg=4.6 mm, Hs=1.6 mm, H1=12 mm, H2=6 mm, a=21 mm, b=21 mm, h=12 mm, and s=7 mm.Figure 1
Geometry of the proposed DRA. (a) Side view. (b) Top view. (c) Metal frame.
(a)
(b)
(c)To demonstrate the usefulness of the loaded patches, the antennas without the upper patch and lower patch were analyzed as illustrated in Figure2. It can be observed from Figure 2 that the resonant frequencies are supposed to be determined by the DR and the two loaded patches. The DR is considered to resonate at the middle frequency of 1.9 GHz, and the upper patch and the lower patch are considered to resonate at 2.1 GHz and 1.72 GHz, respectively. Electromagnetic energy is coupled to the DR through a rectangular slot cut in the ground plane. The aperture coupled DR acts as the primary radiator and the loaded patches act as the parasitic ones. With the introduction of the parasitic elements, additional resonant frequencies (1.72 GHz and 2.1 GHz) close to that of the dielectric resonator antenna are obtained; thus the antenna bandwidth can be significantly improved as shown in Figure 2. More details about the effect of the loaded patches on the antenna performances will be addressed later.Figure 2
Simulated return loss against frequencies for the antenna without the loaded patches compared with the proposed antenna.The higher-order modes of rectangular DRAs can be used for enhanced gain design [16], but the DRs have high profile and limited bandwidth. Owing to the loaded patches, the higher-order mode E113x of the DR at 1.9 GHz is excited, while the height of the DR is relatively small. The simulated electric field distribution in the DR is plotted in Figure 3. In addition, by properly optimizing the size and location of the patches, good performance in radiation patterns, gain, and bandwidth can be achieved. Surface current distribution on the loaded patches for the horizontal polarization is illustrated in Figure 4. It can be seen that the current is approximately uniformly distributed along y-axis, which contributes to reducing the cross-polarization. In Figure 4(a), the currents are mainly distributed on the two edges of the upper patch along x-axis, while in Figure 4(b) the currents are mainly distributed on the two edges of the lower patch along y-axis. Because of this kind of current distribution on the two loaded patches, good and stable unidirectional radiation patterns can be obtained.Figure 3
Simulated electric field distributions in the DR at 1.9 GHz.Figure 4
Surface current distributions. (a) Upper patch at 2.1 GHz. (b) Lower patch at 1.72 GHz.
(a)
(b)Table1 is listed to understand some achievement in dielectric resonator antennas. The comparison gives performances including bandwidth, gain, size, and cross-polarization. From Table 1, it can be seen that most of the traditional hybrid antenna designs could not achieve over 7 dBi antenna gain and have relatively high cross-polarization levels. Compared with these hybrid dielectric resonator antennas, the proposed antenna has an appreciable gain enhancement while maintaining good performances of bandwidth, size, and cross-polarization.Table 1
Comparison of the dielectric resonator antennas.
Reference
f
0 (GHz)
BW (%)
Peak gain (dBi)
X-pol (dB)
[4]
5.8
23.5
7.5
−18
[5]
5.5
28.9
3.8
−15
[7]
1.71
6.3
5
−18
[10]
3.73
11.6
6.45
−20
[12]
7.45
17
5
−15
[16]
11
8.3
10.2
−20
[15]
3.5
2.4
5.72
−20
Proposed
2
25.6
8.2
−28.5Compared with the wide-band DRA, it seems that the proposed technique is not impressed. But we have to mention that the bandwidth of the proposed antenna can be further extended by properly adjusting some parameters. Take the parameterWp, for example, the bandwidth can increase to 31.3% from previous 25.6% as shown in Figure 9(a). Because of the main focus on the applications that are required to cover the working frequency band from 1.7 to 2.2 GHz, the aim of the design is to make the return loss in the working frequency band as small as possible.


## 3. Results and Discussion

To demonstrate the validity of the above hybrid design, an antenna prototype according to the optimized parameters has been fabricated and measured, and its performance has been simulated by ANSYS HFSS. A prototype of the proposed DR antenna fabricated according to the optimized parameters is shown in Figure5.Figure 5
Photographs of the proposed DRA. (a) 3D view and (b) side view.
(a)
(b)Figure6 illustrates the simulated and measured return loss. The measured −10 dB return loss bandwidth is 25.6% from 1.7 to 2.2 GHz. The simulated and measured gains in the operating frequency band are depicted in Figure 7. An average measured gain of 7.54 dBi is found over the operating frequencies. The simulated and measured radiation patterns at 2 GHz are depicted in Figure 8. It can be seen that the proposed antenna radiates a maximum power towards the broadside direction. The simulated cross-polarization levels in the E-plane and H-plane are less than −33.8 dB and −49.6 dB. The measured cross-polarization levels in the E-plane and H-plane are below −28.5 dB and −43 dB, respectively, and the measured cross-polarization level is higher than the simulated results.Figure 6
Return loss against frequency of the proposed DRA.Figure 7
Antenna gains against frequency of the proposed DRA.Figure 8
Simulated and measured radiation patterns of the proposed antenna at 2 GHz.
(a)
E-Plane
(b)
H-PlaneFigure 9
Effect of the width of the upper patchWp. (a) Return loss. (b) Antenna gains.
(a)
(b)In order to investigate how the dimensions of the antenna affect the antenna performances, a parametric study has been performed.Figure9 shows the effect of the width of the upper patch Wp. This parameter determines both the resonant frequencies and antenna gains at the high end of the frequency band. With the decrease of Wp, the high end of the frequency band expands significantly, while the low end of the frequency band changes slightly. The bandwidth of the proposed antenna can be further extended by properly adjusting the width of the upper patch. The antenna gains at higher frequencies can be increased by about 0.4 dBi when Wp increases to 48 mm from 39 mm, but the impedance matching for higher frequencies turns bad seriously, which is suitable for wide-band design.Figure10 shows the effect of the width of the lower patch Lp. This parameter determines both the resonant frequencies and antenna gains at the low end of the frequency band. With the increase of Lp, the low end of the frequency band moves closer to the lower operating frequency, while the high end of the frequency band changes slightly. The antenna gains at lower frequencies together with the bandwidth will be significantly reduced when Lp decreases to 55 mm from 70 mm. Therefore, larger Lp can enhance the antenna gains at lower frequencies and expand the bandwidth of the proposed antenna.Figure 10
Effect of the width of the lower patchLp. (a) Return loss. (b) Antenna gains.
(a)
(b)Figure11(a) shows the simulated return loss versus frequency with different H1 and H2. It can be seen from the figuration that if H1 is too small, take 10 mm, for example, the reflection coefficients between 1.7 and 1.8 GHz get close to −10 dB, which is not for wide-band design. When H1 is too large, the impedance matching for middle end of the frequency band turns bad. Thus, the optimized value for H2 is chosen to be 12 mm. With the variation of H2, the reflection coefficients change slightly in the lower working frequency band, while, as depicted in Figure 9, we can find that the impact of H2 on the impedance matching is significant at the higher frequency band. With the variation of H2 from 5 mm to 7 mm, the impedance matching between 1.9 and 2.14 GHz becomes bad.Figure 11
Effect of the parametersH1 and H2. (a) Return loss. (b) Cross-polarization level.
(a)
(b)In the E-plane, the simulated cross-polarization levels in the broadside direction against the frequency withH1 and H2 are displayed in Figure 11(b). Observe that the cross-polarization decreases significantly as H1+H2 increases from 16 mm to 20 mm. When H1 is chosen to be 12 mm or 14 mm, the average cross-polarization remains below the −40 dB level; considering the compact design for the design, the optimum value of H1 has been chosen to be 12 mm. Varying H2 from 5 mm to 7 mm, it can be seen that both the bigger H2 and the smaller H2 will bring about high cross-polarization levels. Through the parametric study, the optimum value for H2 was chosen to be 6 mm.


## 4. Conclusion

A compact wide-band dielectric resonator loaded patches antenna has been proposed and investigated. With the introduction of the loaded patches, multiple resonant frequencies emerged, which results in wide bandwidth and enhanced antenna gain. Parametric studies illustrate the usefulness of the loaded patches. An antenna prototype was constructed and tested. The measured −10 dB return loss bandwidth is 25.6% from 1.7 to 2.2 GHz. An average gain of 7.54 dBi and unidirectional radiation patterns with low cross-polarization were obtained. Moreover, the antenna structure is simple and compact, which can be developed to form antenna arrays for compact base stations in wireless communications.



---

*Source: 6290539-2017-04-26.xml*