# Electrocatalytic Activity for CO, MeOH, and EtOH Oxidation on the Surface of Pt-Ru Nanoparticles Supported by Metal Oxide

Authors: Kwang-Sik Sim; Sin-Mook Lim; Hai-Doo Kwen; Seong-Ho Choi
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2011)

---

## Abstract

This paper describes the electrocatalytic activity for CO, MeOH, and EtOH oxidation on the surface of Pt-Ru nanoparticles supported by metal oxide (Nb-TiO2-H) prepared for use in a fuel cell. To prepare Nb-TiO2-supported Pt-Ru nanoparticles, first, the Nb-TiO2 supports were prepared by sol-gel reaction of titanium tetraisopropoxide with a small amount of the niobium ethoxide in polystyrene (PS) colloids. Second, Pt-Ru nanoparticles were then deposited by chemical reduction of the Pt4+ and Ru3+ ions onto Nb-TiO2 supports (Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-CS). Nb element was used to reduce electrical resistance to facilitate electron transport during the electrochemical reactions on a fuel cell electrode. Finally, the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts were formed by the removal of core-polystyrene ball from Pt-Ru@TiO2-CS at 500∘C. The successfully prepared Pt-Ru electrocatalysts were confirmed via TEM, XPS, and ICP analysis. The electrocatalytic efficiency of Pt-Ru nanoparticles was evaluated via CO, MeOH, and EtOH oxidation for use in a direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC). As a result, the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H electrodes showed high electrocatalytic activity for the electrooxidation of CO, MeOH, and EtOH.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Many researcher efforts have been devoted to improving the catalytic performance of carbon supported Pt-Ru catalysts [1–3]. In a colloidal method, dispersion and adsorption of catalytic nanoparticles on the surface of carbon supports is done in the presence of protecting agents to avoid aggregation of particles. It should be noted that the protecting agent is likely to reduce the catalytic activities of catalyst particles. In another method known as the impregnation method, a metal precursor is reduced by the carbon supports dispersed in the solution [4–6]. Carbon supports should be dispersed well without interference of a protecting agent in the suspension. In previous papers [7, 8], the Pt-Ru nanoparticles were deposited on various carbon supports using γ-irradiation to use as anode catalysts in a direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC). However, the life time of the electrode was reduced, since the carbon supports were slowly oxidized in the fuel cell, as shown in
(1)C+2H2O⟶CO2+4H++4e-,E0=0.207VversusNHEat25°C.In general, the support materials should possess the following properties: (1) a high surface area for a high level of dispersion of the nanosized catalysts, (2) low electrical resistance to facilitate electron transport during the electrochemical reactions, (3) a pore structure suitable for fuel or oxidant contact and by product release, and (4) strong interaction between the catalyst nanoparticles and the supports. Oxide materials are widely used as a support in heterogeneous catalyst, since they possess those properties. They have inherently higher stability compared to carbon in oxidizing environments [9, 10]. The use of titanium dioxide support in a fuel cell operation has been of great interest due to its stability, low cost, commercial availability in water, and ease to control size and structure [11, 12]. The potential applications of hollow nanomaterials, especially TiO2 hollow (TiO2-H) spheres, have been explored in various areas, such as light-trapping, chemical separation, photocatalysts, biomedicine, and optical devices [13, 14]. Compared to general core-shell nanostructures, TiO2-H spheres are exceptional for their special internal cavity, high specific surface area, high mobility, and low density [15–17]. However, to our knowledge, little work has been reported on the application of hollow oxide spheres as a support, especially in fuel cells.In this study, the Nb-doped TiO2 supports were prepared with core-polystyrene and shell-Nb-TiO2, (Nb-TiO2-CS), for use as fuel cell anode catalysts. The Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-CS was then obtained by deposition of the Pt-Ru nanoparticles on the surface of the Nb-TiO2-CS using γ-irradiation and chemical reducing agents in aqueous solution, respectively. Finally, the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H was fabricated via removal of the core-polystyrene from Nb-TiO2-CS at 500°C. The electrocatalytic activity of Pt-Ru nanoparticles on metal oxide supports was evaluated via CO, methanol, and ethanol oxidation in a 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte in order to use for fuel cell anode electrode.


## 2. Experiment

### 2.1. Reagents

Styrene, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and 2-propanol (99%) were obtained from Samchun Chemical Co (Korea). Titanium tetraisopropoxide, niobium ethoxide, hydrogen hexachloroplatinate(IV) hydrate, potassium persulfate, and ruthenium(III) chloride hydrate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (USA). Formalin and ethyl alcohol were obtained from Jin Chemical pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Korea). All other chemicals were in reagent grade and were used without further purification.


### 2.2. Synthesis of Polystyrene as Core-Ball via Surfactant-Free Emulsion Polymerization

Polystyrene nanoparticles (PS) as core-ball were prepared as follows: potassium persulfate (KPS) was dissolved completely in deionized (D.I.) water with stirring of 350 rpm for 60 min under nitrogen atmosphere. Styrene monomer was added to the above-prepared solution and polymerized at 75°C for 24 hours under nitrogen atmosphere.


### 2.3. Preparation of the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H Catalysts

The Nb-TiO2 supports were prepared by sol-gel method. SDS (0.5 g) as an anchoring agent was dissolved in the prepared PS colloids (10 mL) and stirred for 60 min under nitrogen atmosphere. Titanium tetraisopropoxide (1.2 mL) and niobium ethoxide (45 μL) were dissolved in 25 mL ethanol. The ethanol solution was slowly added to PS colloids, and the polymerization was processed while stirring (350 rpm) at 75°C for 24 hours under nitrogen atmosphere.Scheme1 shows the preparation procedure of Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts by chemical reduction method and γ-irradiation. In Method 1, the core-PS and shell-Nb-TiO2 supports (0.5 g) were well dispersed in 182 mL D.I. water, and pH was adjusted to 9.0 using NaOH. Hydrogen hexachloroplatinate(IV) hydrate (0.21 g) and ruthenium(III) chloride hydrate (0.205 g) were then added to the above-prepared colloids. To reduce the Pt4+ and Ru3+ ions, the formalin, as a reducing agent, was added to the above-prepared colloids. After the Pt4+ and Ru3+ ions were reduced by ultrasonic irradiation for 60 min, the prepared Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-CS nanoparticles were filtered (Whatman-2) and dried in a vacuum oven at 50°C for 8 h. Upon calcination at 500°C for 4 hrs in air, the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts were obtained.Scheme 1
Preparation procedure of the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts by two methods.In Method 2, Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-CS nanostructure was prepared by radiolytic reduction of Pt4+ and Ru3+ ions in the presence of the core-PS and shell-Nb-TiO2. H2PtCl6xH2O (0.21 g) and RuCl3xH2O (0.205 g) were dissolved in the Nb-TiO2 colloids (182 mL) that contained 2-propanol (12.0 mL) as the radical scavenger. Nitrogen was bubbled for 30 min through the solution to remove oxygen, and the solution was then irradiated (Co-60 source) under atmospheric pressure and ambient temperature. A total dose of 30 kGy (a dose rate = 6.48 × 105/h) were applied. Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-CS nanoparticles were filtered (Whatman-2) and dried in a vacuum oven at 50°C for 8 h. The Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts were also obtained by the method described above.


### 2.4. Characterization

Particle size and morphology of the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-CS and Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts were analyzed by FE-SEM (Hitachi, S-4700, Japan) and HR-TEM (JEOL, JEM-2010, USA). The content of Pt and Ru in samples was measured by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometer (ICP-AES) (Jobin-Yvon, Ultima-C, USA). The X-ray photoelectron spectra of the samples were obtained using Thermo Fisher Scientific, MultiLab. ESCA2000, (USA). X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained using a Japanese Rigaku D/max γA X-ray diffractometer equipped with graphite monochromatized Cu Ka radiation (λ = 0.15414 nm). The scanning range was 5–80° with a scanning rate of 5°/min.To evaluate the catalytic efficiency of Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts for the electro-oxidation of CO, MeOH, and EtOH, the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalyst electrode was prepared as follows: firstly, the catalytic inks were prepared by mixing of Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts (5.0 mg) and 5% Nafion solution (0.05 mL) and stirred for 24 h. Secondly, the catalytic inks were applied on a glass carbon (0.02 cm2) by wet coating and dried in a vacuum oven at 50°C under nitrogen gas. The electro-oxidation of CO, MeOH, and EtOH was examined using the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalyst electrode, submerged in 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte by cyclic voltammetry (EG&G INSTRUMENTS, Potentiostat/Galvanostat model 283, USA).


## 2.1. Reagents

Styrene, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and 2-propanol (99%) were obtained from Samchun Chemical Co (Korea). Titanium tetraisopropoxide, niobium ethoxide, hydrogen hexachloroplatinate(IV) hydrate, potassium persulfate, and ruthenium(III) chloride hydrate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (USA). Formalin and ethyl alcohol were obtained from Jin Chemical pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Korea). All other chemicals were in reagent grade and were used without further purification.


## 2.2. Synthesis of Polystyrene as Core-Ball via Surfactant-Free Emulsion Polymerization

Polystyrene nanoparticles (PS) as core-ball were prepared as follows: potassium persulfate (KPS) was dissolved completely in deionized (D.I.) water with stirring of 350 rpm for 60 min under nitrogen atmosphere. Styrene monomer was added to the above-prepared solution and polymerized at 75°C for 24 hours under nitrogen atmosphere.


## 2.3. Preparation of the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H Catalysts

The Nb-TiO2 supports were prepared by sol-gel method. SDS (0.5 g) as an anchoring agent was dissolved in the prepared PS colloids (10 mL) and stirred for 60 min under nitrogen atmosphere. Titanium tetraisopropoxide (1.2 mL) and niobium ethoxide (45 μL) were dissolved in 25 mL ethanol. The ethanol solution was slowly added to PS colloids, and the polymerization was processed while stirring (350 rpm) at 75°C for 24 hours under nitrogen atmosphere.Scheme1 shows the preparation procedure of Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts by chemical reduction method and γ-irradiation. In Method 1, the core-PS and shell-Nb-TiO2 supports (0.5 g) were well dispersed in 182 mL D.I. water, and pH was adjusted to 9.0 using NaOH. Hydrogen hexachloroplatinate(IV) hydrate (0.21 g) and ruthenium(III) chloride hydrate (0.205 g) were then added to the above-prepared colloids. To reduce the Pt4+ and Ru3+ ions, the formalin, as a reducing agent, was added to the above-prepared colloids. After the Pt4+ and Ru3+ ions were reduced by ultrasonic irradiation for 60 min, the prepared Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-CS nanoparticles were filtered (Whatman-2) and dried in a vacuum oven at 50°C for 8 h. Upon calcination at 500°C for 4 hrs in air, the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts were obtained.Scheme 1
Preparation procedure of the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts by two methods.In Method 2, Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-CS nanostructure was prepared by radiolytic reduction of Pt4+ and Ru3+ ions in the presence of the core-PS and shell-Nb-TiO2. H2PtCl6xH2O (0.21 g) and RuCl3xH2O (0.205 g) were dissolved in the Nb-TiO2 colloids (182 mL) that contained 2-propanol (12.0 mL) as the radical scavenger. Nitrogen was bubbled for 30 min through the solution to remove oxygen, and the solution was then irradiated (Co-60 source) under atmospheric pressure and ambient temperature. A total dose of 30 kGy (a dose rate = 6.48 × 105/h) were applied. Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-CS nanoparticles were filtered (Whatman-2) and dried in a vacuum oven at 50°C for 8 h. The Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts were also obtained by the method described above.


## 2.4. Characterization

Particle size and morphology of the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-CS and Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts were analyzed by FE-SEM (Hitachi, S-4700, Japan) and HR-TEM (JEOL, JEM-2010, USA). The content of Pt and Ru in samples was measured by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometer (ICP-AES) (Jobin-Yvon, Ultima-C, USA). The X-ray photoelectron spectra of the samples were obtained using Thermo Fisher Scientific, MultiLab. ESCA2000, (USA). X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained using a Japanese Rigaku D/max γA X-ray diffractometer equipped with graphite monochromatized Cu Ka radiation (λ = 0.15414 nm). The scanning range was 5–80° with a scanning rate of 5°/min.To evaluate the catalytic efficiency of Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts for the electro-oxidation of CO, MeOH, and EtOH, the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalyst electrode was prepared as follows: firstly, the catalytic inks were prepared by mixing of Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts (5.0 mg) and 5% Nafion solution (0.05 mL) and stirred for 24 h. Secondly, the catalytic inks were applied on a glass carbon (0.02 cm2) by wet coating and dried in a vacuum oven at 50°C under nitrogen gas. The electro-oxidation of CO, MeOH, and EtOH was examined using the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalyst electrode, submerged in 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte by cyclic voltammetry (EG&G INSTRUMENTS, Potentiostat/Galvanostat model 283, USA).


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Characterization of Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H Catalysts

As mentioned above, the oxide supports for fuel cell electrode have high surface area, low electrical resistance, uniform porous structure, and interaction between catalysts and supports. In particular, surface area and electrical conductivity are very important factors in electrocatalytic reactions. The Nb-TiO2 powder has been attractive as supports due to its high conductivity [18]. The conductivity of the Nb-TiO2 (~0.1 Ω−1 cm−1) is superior to that of the pure TiO2 (10−6 Ω−1 cm−1) and commercial Vulcan XC-72 carbon supports. However, the Nb-TiO2 powder is insufficient as fuel cell supports because of low surface area. To increase surface area, the supports require nanostructure such as core-shell nanostructure or the ordered uniform porous structure.In a previous paper [19], the PS particles of 450 nm in diameter and poly(styrene-co-styrene sulfonate), PSS, particles of 140–160 nm in diameter were prepared by emulsifier-free emulsion polymerization. The surfaces of the PS and PSS particles were coated with Ag nanoparticles as antimicrobial agents via reduction of Ag ions using γ-irradiation. In this study, PS particles were used as template for preparing nanostructure supports as shown in Scheme 1. Figure 1 shows SEM images of PS spheres as a template prepared by emulsion-free polymerization. The diameter of the monodispersed PS particles was 450 nm. The surface of the monodispersed PS ball possess hydrophobic properties; therefore, in order to deposit Nb-TiO2 with hydrophilic properties, anchoring agents such as SDS, poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone), and PVP were used.SEM images of PS spheres as template prepared by emulsion-free polymerization.
(a)(b)Figure2 shows TEM images of the sphere with core-PS and shell-Nb-TiO2, PS/Nb-TiO2 (a), Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-CS (b), and Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H (c) prepared by chemical reduction, as shown in Scheme 1. In Figure 2(a), Nb metals were deposited on the surface of TiO2 shell wall. As shown in Figures 2(b) and 2(c), the Pt-Ru nanoparticles do not completely appear in TEM images. On the other hand, the nanostructure form (hollow form) with thickness of ~15 nm was successfully prepared as shown in Figure 2(c). Figure 3 also shows the TEM images of PS/Nb-TiO2 (a), Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-CS (b), and Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H (c) prepared by γ-irradiation as shown in Scheme 1. In Figure 3(b), after deposition of Pt-Ru nanoparticle on the surface of Nb-TiO2 supports using γ-irradiation, the Pt-Ru nanoparticles were well dispersed on the surface of Nb-TiO2. However, the Pt-Ru nanoparticles do not appear in TEM image. After calcinations, the patterns of Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts are different compared to that of Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts prepared by chemical reduction. This might be caused by the radiation damage of TiO2 shell.TEM images of the PS/Nb-TiO2 (a), Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-CS (b), and Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2 (c) prepared by Method 1 in Scheme 1.
(a)(b)(c)TEM images of the PS/Nb-TiO2 (a), Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-CS (b), and Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2 (c) prepared by Method 2 in Scheme 1.
(a)(b)(c)As mentioned above, the Pt-Ru nanoparticles cannot clearly be determined by TEM images. For clear evaluation of the existence of Pt-Ru nanoparticles, the core-PS and shell-Nb-TiO2 supports, PS/Nb-TiO2, and Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H were analyzed via XPS spectroscopy. Figure 4 shows the XPS data of the PS/Nb-TiO2 (a) and Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts (b) prepared by chemical reduction. The peaks Nb and Ti element are assigned, as shown in Figure 4(a), and the Pt and Ru elements of the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H prepared by chemical reduction were determined, as shown in Figure 4(b). These results clearly indicate that the Pt-Ru nanoparticles were successfully deposited on the surface of PS/Nb-TiO2 by chemical reduction method. Figure 5 also shows the XPS spectra of the PS/Nb-TiO2 nanostructure (a) and Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts (b) prepared by γ-irradiation method. The peaks Nb and Ti element are also assigned in Figure 5(a), and the Pt and Ru elements of the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H prepared by γ-irradiation were also determined in Figure 5(b). From these results, Pt-Ru nanoparticles were successfully loaded on the surface of PS/Nb-TiO2 nanostructure by γ-irradiation.X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of the PS/Nb-TiO2 (a) and Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H (b) prepared by Method 1 in Scheme 1.
(a)(b)X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of the PS/Nb-TiO2 (a) and Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H (b) prepared by method 2.
(a)(b)Figure6 presents XRD patterns of the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts prepared by Method 1 (a) and by Method 2 (b). Figure 6(a) shows the crystallinity of the Pt-Ru nanoparticles, and peaks are present at 39.9°, 46.2°, and 67.4°. These peaks are assigned to Pt- (111), -(200), and -(220), respectively. The (*) mark represents XRD patterns of Nb-TiO2 nanosized supports. This means that Nb-TiO2 supports were interpreted dominant rutile crystal structure of TiO2. On the other hand, in Figure 6(b), the peaks of Pt-Ru nanoparticles on Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts shows very broad patterns compared to that of Pt-Ru nanoparticle on Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts prepared by chemical reduction. The size of Pt-Ru nanoparticle was very small compared to that of Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2 catalyst prepared by chemical reduction.X-ray diffraction patterns of Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalyst prepared by Method 1 (a) and by Method 2 (b). The (*) markd represents XRD patterns of Nb-TiO2 nanosized support.
(a)(b)Table1 presents the contents (wt-%) of Pt and Ru element in the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts prepared by chemical reduction and γ-irradiation. When Pt-Ru alloy nanoparticles are deposited on Nb-TiO2 supports, γ-irradiation generates slightly higher Pt content than that of Ru content, while chemical reduction produces significantly higher Ru content than that of Pt content. This may be due to the difference in the reduction potential of the two metal ions. The reduction potential of Pt ion, [(PtCl)42- (aq) + 2e− → Pt(s) + 4Cl− (aq), E0 = 0.73 V], is higher than that of Ru ion. In chemical reduction, a metal ion is reduced by accepting an electron from a reducing agent. On the other hand, when the Pt-Ru alloy nanoparticle is deposited on Nb-TiO2 support by γ-irradiation irradiation, the hydrated electron (eaq-) is generated in aqueous solution. This hydrated electron may hold lower reduction potential, so the Pt ions are quickly reduced to that of Ru ions. The hydrated electron produced in aqueous solution affects the yield of Pt-Ru alloy nanoparticles.Table 1
Contents of the containing elements in Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H prepared by Method 1 and 2 analyzed by ICP.
Sample nameContents (wt-%)NbPtRuTio2Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H (Method 1)2.800.986.4440.6Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H (Method 2)2.7814.49.4039.4


### 3.2. Electrocatalytic Efficiency of CO, MeOH, and EtOH Oxidation on the Surface of Pt-Ru Nanoparticles on Nb-TiO2-H Supports

The efficiency of these catalysts toward the electrochemical oxidation of carbon monoxide (CO) was tested. Figure7 presents the cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of electro-oxidation of CO oxidation on the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalyst electrodes. Peak of stripping CO could be seen at 0.8 V for the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalyst electrodes prepared by chemical reduction (a) and γ-irradiation (b). These peaks signify that CO oxidation is energetically favorable at these electrodes. The electrochemically active specific area (SEAS) of the catalysts was calculated by using the charges deduced from the CV of CO adsorption and desorption electro-oxidation process, and using the following equation [7](2)SEAS=QCOG×420,
where QCO is the charge for CO desorption electro-oxidation in microcolumb (μC), G represents the summation of Pt + Ru metal loading (μg) on the electrode, and 420 is the charge required to oxidize a monolayer of CO on the catalysts in μC cm−2. The electrochemical SEASs are 58 and 36 m2 g−1 for the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalyst prepared by chemical reduction (a) and γ-irradiation (b), respectively. It may be considered that the higher SEAS for Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalyst is obtained due to the smaller particle size, even distribution, and the large loading of Pt-Ru alloy nanoparticles on the surface of Nb-TiO2 supports.CO stripping voltammograms recorded in 0.5 M H2SO4 for Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalyst prepared by Method 1 (a) and Method 2 (b).
(a)(b)Figure8 presents the CVs recorded at the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalyst electrodes for electro-oxidation of methanol in 0.5 M H2SO4. The peak current values at 0.7 V (versus Ag/AgCl) corresponding to the oxidation of methanol shows variation between the catalysts prepared by different routes. A larger peak current was noticed at 0.7 V (versus Ag/AgCl) for the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalyst prepared by γ-irradiation (Figure 8(b)). We conclude that a higher content of Pt(wt%) in Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts (γ-irradiation) determines the catalytic efficiency towards methanol oxidation. However, as one can see in Figure 3(c), the TiO2 supports was destroyed during γ-irradiation. Therefore, the chemical reduction assisted with ultrasonic irradiation for the deposition of Pt-Ru nanoparticles onto Nb-TiO2 supports was better than that of γ-irradiation method as stability of metal oxide supports.CV curves recorded in 0.5 M H2SO4 to 1.0 M MeOH oxidation for Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts prepared by Method 1 (a) and Method 2 (b).
(a)(b)Figure9 shows the CVs for EtOH oxidation with various concentrations onto the surface of Pt-Ru nanoparticles deposited with Nb-TiO2 supports in 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte. The peak current values at 0.8 V (versus Ag/AgCl) corresponding to the oxidation of ethanol. The maximum catalytic efficiency was appeared in 0.5 M EtOH concentration. As a result, the prepared Pt-Ru nanoparticles onto metal oxide supports can be used in fuel cell anode electrode.Figure 9
CV curves recorded in 0.5 M H2SO4 to EtOH oxidation for Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts.


## 3.1. Characterization of Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H Catalysts

As mentioned above, the oxide supports for fuel cell electrode have high surface area, low electrical resistance, uniform porous structure, and interaction between catalysts and supports. In particular, surface area and electrical conductivity are very important factors in electrocatalytic reactions. The Nb-TiO2 powder has been attractive as supports due to its high conductivity [18]. The conductivity of the Nb-TiO2 (~0.1 Ω−1 cm−1) is superior to that of the pure TiO2 (10−6 Ω−1 cm−1) and commercial Vulcan XC-72 carbon supports. However, the Nb-TiO2 powder is insufficient as fuel cell supports because of low surface area. To increase surface area, the supports require nanostructure such as core-shell nanostructure or the ordered uniform porous structure.In a previous paper [19], the PS particles of 450 nm in diameter and poly(styrene-co-styrene sulfonate), PSS, particles of 140–160 nm in diameter were prepared by emulsifier-free emulsion polymerization. The surfaces of the PS and PSS particles were coated with Ag nanoparticles as antimicrobial agents via reduction of Ag ions using γ-irradiation. In this study, PS particles were used as template for preparing nanostructure supports as shown in Scheme 1. Figure 1 shows SEM images of PS spheres as a template prepared by emulsion-free polymerization. The diameter of the monodispersed PS particles was 450 nm. The surface of the monodispersed PS ball possess hydrophobic properties; therefore, in order to deposit Nb-TiO2 with hydrophilic properties, anchoring agents such as SDS, poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone), and PVP were used.SEM images of PS spheres as template prepared by emulsion-free polymerization.
(a)(b)Figure2 shows TEM images of the sphere with core-PS and shell-Nb-TiO2, PS/Nb-TiO2 (a), Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-CS (b), and Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H (c) prepared by chemical reduction, as shown in Scheme 1. In Figure 2(a), Nb metals were deposited on the surface of TiO2 shell wall. As shown in Figures 2(b) and 2(c), the Pt-Ru nanoparticles do not completely appear in TEM images. On the other hand, the nanostructure form (hollow form) with thickness of ~15 nm was successfully prepared as shown in Figure 2(c). Figure 3 also shows the TEM images of PS/Nb-TiO2 (a), Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-CS (b), and Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H (c) prepared by γ-irradiation as shown in Scheme 1. In Figure 3(b), after deposition of Pt-Ru nanoparticle on the surface of Nb-TiO2 supports using γ-irradiation, the Pt-Ru nanoparticles were well dispersed on the surface of Nb-TiO2. However, the Pt-Ru nanoparticles do not appear in TEM image. After calcinations, the patterns of Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts are different compared to that of Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts prepared by chemical reduction. This might be caused by the radiation damage of TiO2 shell.TEM images of the PS/Nb-TiO2 (a), Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-CS (b), and Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2 (c) prepared by Method 1 in Scheme 1.
(a)(b)(c)TEM images of the PS/Nb-TiO2 (a), Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-CS (b), and Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2 (c) prepared by Method 2 in Scheme 1.
(a)(b)(c)As mentioned above, the Pt-Ru nanoparticles cannot clearly be determined by TEM images. For clear evaluation of the existence of Pt-Ru nanoparticles, the core-PS and shell-Nb-TiO2 supports, PS/Nb-TiO2, and Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H were analyzed via XPS spectroscopy. Figure 4 shows the XPS data of the PS/Nb-TiO2 (a) and Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts (b) prepared by chemical reduction. The peaks Nb and Ti element are assigned, as shown in Figure 4(a), and the Pt and Ru elements of the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H prepared by chemical reduction were determined, as shown in Figure 4(b). These results clearly indicate that the Pt-Ru nanoparticles were successfully deposited on the surface of PS/Nb-TiO2 by chemical reduction method. Figure 5 also shows the XPS spectra of the PS/Nb-TiO2 nanostructure (a) and Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts (b) prepared by γ-irradiation method. The peaks Nb and Ti element are also assigned in Figure 5(a), and the Pt and Ru elements of the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H prepared by γ-irradiation were also determined in Figure 5(b). From these results, Pt-Ru nanoparticles were successfully loaded on the surface of PS/Nb-TiO2 nanostructure by γ-irradiation.X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of the PS/Nb-TiO2 (a) and Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H (b) prepared by Method 1 in Scheme 1.
(a)(b)X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of the PS/Nb-TiO2 (a) and Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H (b) prepared by method 2.
(a)(b)Figure6 presents XRD patterns of the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts prepared by Method 1 (a) and by Method 2 (b). Figure 6(a) shows the crystallinity of the Pt-Ru nanoparticles, and peaks are present at 39.9°, 46.2°, and 67.4°. These peaks are assigned to Pt- (111), -(200), and -(220), respectively. The (*) mark represents XRD patterns of Nb-TiO2 nanosized supports. This means that Nb-TiO2 supports were interpreted dominant rutile crystal structure of TiO2. On the other hand, in Figure 6(b), the peaks of Pt-Ru nanoparticles on Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts shows very broad patterns compared to that of Pt-Ru nanoparticle on Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts prepared by chemical reduction. The size of Pt-Ru nanoparticle was very small compared to that of Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2 catalyst prepared by chemical reduction.X-ray diffraction patterns of Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalyst prepared by Method 1 (a) and by Method 2 (b). The (*) markd represents XRD patterns of Nb-TiO2 nanosized support.
(a)(b)Table1 presents the contents (wt-%) of Pt and Ru element in the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts prepared by chemical reduction and γ-irradiation. When Pt-Ru alloy nanoparticles are deposited on Nb-TiO2 supports, γ-irradiation generates slightly higher Pt content than that of Ru content, while chemical reduction produces significantly higher Ru content than that of Pt content. This may be due to the difference in the reduction potential of the two metal ions. The reduction potential of Pt ion, [(PtCl)42- (aq) + 2e− → Pt(s) + 4Cl− (aq), E0 = 0.73 V], is higher than that of Ru ion. In chemical reduction, a metal ion is reduced by accepting an electron from a reducing agent. On the other hand, when the Pt-Ru alloy nanoparticle is deposited on Nb-TiO2 support by γ-irradiation irradiation, the hydrated electron (eaq-) is generated in aqueous solution. This hydrated electron may hold lower reduction potential, so the Pt ions are quickly reduced to that of Ru ions. The hydrated electron produced in aqueous solution affects the yield of Pt-Ru alloy nanoparticles.Table 1
Contents of the containing elements in Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H prepared by Method 1 and 2 analyzed by ICP.
Sample nameContents (wt-%)NbPtRuTio2Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H (Method 1)2.800.986.4440.6Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H (Method 2)2.7814.49.4039.4


## 3.2. Electrocatalytic Efficiency of CO, MeOH, and EtOH Oxidation on the Surface of Pt-Ru Nanoparticles on Nb-TiO2-H Supports

The efficiency of these catalysts toward the electrochemical oxidation of carbon monoxide (CO) was tested. Figure7 presents the cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of electro-oxidation of CO oxidation on the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalyst electrodes. Peak of stripping CO could be seen at 0.8 V for the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalyst electrodes prepared by chemical reduction (a) and γ-irradiation (b). These peaks signify that CO oxidation is energetically favorable at these electrodes. The electrochemically active specific area (SEAS) of the catalysts was calculated by using the charges deduced from the CV of CO adsorption and desorption electro-oxidation process, and using the following equation [7](2)SEAS=QCOG×420,
where QCO is the charge for CO desorption electro-oxidation in microcolumb (μC), G represents the summation of Pt + Ru metal loading (μg) on the electrode, and 420 is the charge required to oxidize a monolayer of CO on the catalysts in μC cm−2. The electrochemical SEASs are 58 and 36 m2 g−1 for the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalyst prepared by chemical reduction (a) and γ-irradiation (b), respectively. It may be considered that the higher SEAS for Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalyst is obtained due to the smaller particle size, even distribution, and the large loading of Pt-Ru alloy nanoparticles on the surface of Nb-TiO2 supports.CO stripping voltammograms recorded in 0.5 M H2SO4 for Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalyst prepared by Method 1 (a) and Method 2 (b).
(a)(b)Figure8 presents the CVs recorded at the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalyst electrodes for electro-oxidation of methanol in 0.5 M H2SO4. The peak current values at 0.7 V (versus Ag/AgCl) corresponding to the oxidation of methanol shows variation between the catalysts prepared by different routes. A larger peak current was noticed at 0.7 V (versus Ag/AgCl) for the Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalyst prepared by γ-irradiation (Figure 8(b)). We conclude that a higher content of Pt(wt%) in Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts (γ-irradiation) determines the catalytic efficiency towards methanol oxidation. However, as one can see in Figure 3(c), the TiO2 supports was destroyed during γ-irradiation. Therefore, the chemical reduction assisted with ultrasonic irradiation for the deposition of Pt-Ru nanoparticles onto Nb-TiO2 supports was better than that of γ-irradiation method as stability of metal oxide supports.CV curves recorded in 0.5 M H2SO4 to 1.0 M MeOH oxidation for Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts prepared by Method 1 (a) and Method 2 (b).
(a)(b)Figure9 shows the CVs for EtOH oxidation with various concentrations onto the surface of Pt-Ru nanoparticles deposited with Nb-TiO2 supports in 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte. The peak current values at 0.8 V (versus Ag/AgCl) corresponding to the oxidation of ethanol. The maximum catalytic efficiency was appeared in 0.5 M EtOH concentration. As a result, the prepared Pt-Ru nanoparticles onto metal oxide supports can be used in fuel cell anode electrode.Figure 9
CV curves recorded in 0.5 M H2SO4 to EtOH oxidation for Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts.


## 4. Conclusion

This study describes the preparation of Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalysts by chemical reduction assisted with ultrasonic irradiation and γ-irradiation for fuel cell anode electrode. The conclusion was as follows.(1)
The Pt-Ru@Nb-TiO2-H catalyst was successfully prepared by chemical reduction assisted with ultrasonic irradiation and γ-irradiation.(2)
The size, morphology, and composition of Pt-Ru@ Nb-TiO2-H catalysts were determined via TEM, XRD, and elemental analysis.(3)
The Pt-Ru@TiO2-H electrodes showed the high electrocatalytic activity for electro-oxidation of CO, MeOH, and EtOH. As a result, the catalyst prepared by chemical reduction assisted with ultrasonic irradiation can be used in a fuel cell electrode.



---

*Source: 614983-2011-12-08.xml*