# Modeling the Morning Commute Problem in a Bottleneck Model Based on Personal Perception

Authors: Xiao Guo; Huijun Sun
Journal: Journal of Advanced Transportation
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

This paper studies the travel behavior of travelers who drive from the living area through the highway to the work area during the morning rush hours. The bottleneck model based on personal perception travel behavior has been investigated. Based on their willingness to arrive early, travelers can be divided into two categories: active travelers and negative travelers. Three possible situations have been considered based on travelers’ personal perception. Travelers’ travel choice behaviors are analyzed in detail and equilibrium is achieved with these three situations. The numerical examples show that the departure time choice of the travelers is related not only to the proportion of each type of travelers, but also to personal perceived size.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The well-known bottleneck model was originally developed by Vickrey [1]. This model is a common situation during the morning rush hour, where a fixed and very large number of commuters travel from home to workplace along the same stretch of road. This road has a single bottleneck with a fixed capacity. If the arrival rate at the bottleneck exceeds its capacity, a queue forms. Although all the commuters wish to arrive at the destination at the same time, this is not physically possible because the bottleneck capacity is finite. Consequently, some travelers may decide to depart earlier or later to avoid the cost of waiting in the queue and pay the penalty cost for doing so. Therefore, each traveler faces a trade-off between travel time cost and the schedule delay cost and chooses an optimal departure time to minimize the total travel cost. At equilibrium, the total travel expenses of all travelers are equal, and no one can reduce his/her commuting cost by changing his/her departure time.The bottleneck model depicts the commuting behavior of travelers during morning rush hours with a simple and direct way and clearly describes the formation and dissipation of queuing congestion and the departure time choice behavior of travelers. Subsequently, the morning commuting problem has been expended by many others. Henderson [2] considered the importance of the schedule delay and departure time decisions in a single bottleneck model. Congestion tolls influence the individual commuter’s decision of when to finish a trip and change the distribution of traffic flow. Carey and Srinivasan [3] derived system marginal costs, user perceived costs, and user externality costs and obtain a set of optimal congestion tolls. Mun [4] studies a dynamic model of traffic flow which is presented and describes the formation and development of the traffic jam and proposes a coarse toll to alleviate traffic congestion. Mounce [5] considered a dynamic traffic assignment model with deterministic queuing and inelastic demand for each origin-destination (OD) pair in the network.In previous studies, travelers choose their own departure time by trade-off between waiting time and the schedule delay [6–12]. But, in real life, travelers measure the effect of those practical factors [9–13]; their personal subjective judgment also plays a considerable role.The perceived judgment is the traveler’s psychological judgment of the route travel time, because travelers have their understanding of the route choice. In the static model, the SUE (Stochastic User Equilibrium) is achieved when users can no longer change their perceived utility. This indicates that traveler’s psychological choice plays a key role in the travel process.For example, there are two highways from the Beijing area to Capital Airport: the Jingcheng Expressway and the Capital Airport Expressway. The toll of Jingcheng Expressway is a little higher than that of the Capital Airport Expressway, but the freeway patency of Capital Airport is much lower than that of Beijing-Chengdu Expressway and the expressway of Capital Airport is congested all day. Generally speaking, this phenomenon is explained by the fact that the underestimation of travelers’ time value is the cause of low toll road utilization [14]. However, the perceived choice behavior of travelers is also one of the principal reasons for the low traffic flow. Mahmassani and Jou [15] gave details of the traveler’s travel route choice behavior based on the satisfactory decision criterion and believe that as long as the route choice falls within the undifferentiated curve, the traveler will not change the current route choice. Lou et al. [16] studied the traveler's route choice behavior under the bounded rationality, established the bounded rational user equilibrium model (BRUE) based on the route flow and link flow, and analyzed the traffic distribution in the best and worst cases. Guo and Liu [17] considered the route choice behavior of travelers with bounded rationality, established a day-to-day evolutionary dynamic model based on bounded rationality, and simulated the irreversible evolution of the traffic network. Zhao and Huang [18] studied the bounded rational route choice behavior under Simon’s satisficing rule when travelers considered perceived travel time costs. Wiseman [19] pointed that the travelers’ attitude played an important role in mode choice.In those studies, the influence of psychological factors on the travelers was investigated in the static model. Few scholars have considered the effects of psychological factors in dynamic models. Based on this situation, the impact of human psychological decision-making behavior in the bottleneck model has been studied. In the bottleneck model, since the travel time on the road does not affect the traveler’s departure time choice behavior, it is usually assumed to be zero, and it is not considered. Therefore, each commuter faces a trade-off between travel time cost and the delay cost and chooses an optimal departure time. For schedule delay, on the one hand, travelers need to consider their own early/late time cost; on the other hand, their subjective judgment also plays a certain role in the travel process. How to describe the traveler's travel choice behavior through the subjective consciousness judgment will be the research content of this paper. In the process of psychological decision-making, different travelers have different reactions to arrival early/late. Therefore, this paper divides travelers into two types according to whether they wish to arrive early or not: active and inactive. Next, we will introduce these two kinds of travelers in turn.For some travelers, the closer he arrives at work, the more he feels nervous and the more he becomes uneasy when he is late. For these travelers, arriving early can reduce their tension, and arriving late can increase their tension. This tension based on personal perception is bound to have an impact on the traveler’s choice of departure time. For those who have a strong sense of time, they are called active travelers.On the contrary, some travelers are not proactive, thinking that arriving at work before the work starting time would cost them some of their own benefits. They are more likely to arrive near the preferred arrival time than arriving early. For this part of the travelers, their travel behavior is not as active as the active travelers. So we call this part of the travelers is negative travelers.Compared with the previous models which only consider the waiting time and the schedule delay, this paper takes the bottleneck model as a foothold, studies the traveler’s departure time choice behavior by considering the travelers’ personal perception, and establishes a bottleneck model based on personal perception.


## 2. The Bottleneck Model Based on Personal Perception

### 2.1. Model Description

Let us consider a highway between a residential area and a CBD whereN travelers commute. If the arrival rate exceeds the capacity of the bottleneck on the highway, a queue develops. All individuals want to arrive at the workplace at work start time. Due to capacity, there always exist some persons with queuing time and arrive early or late. On the other hand, people consider the personal perception when they choose the departure time. Based on the previous description, the bottleneck model based on personal perception has been built by considering the traveler’s personal perception. Similar to the classical bottleneck model, the influence of free travel time is not considered.According to the former description, the general travel cost mainly includes three parts in the bottleneck model based on personal perception: queuing waiting time cost, schedule delay cost, and personal perceived cost. There exist two kinds of generalized travel cost by the active travelers and negative travelers. Here, we suppose that the personal perceived utility is a linear function of timet dependence. The personal perceived utility of active travelers isf1(t)=k1(t∗-t-w(t)), 0<k1<β. The personal perceived utility of negative travelers is f2(t)=k2(t∗-t-w(t)), 0<k2<β. Integrating the travel time, schedule delay, and personal perception utility, traveler’s generalized travel cost can be formulated as follows.The generalized travel costC1(t) of active travelers commuting who left home at time t would be expressed:(1)C1t=αwt+max⁡βt∗-wt-t-k1t∗-t-wt,0+max⁡γt+wt-t∗-k1t∗-t-wt,0The generalized travel costC2(t) of negative travelers commuting who left home at time t would be expressed:(2)C2t=αwt+max⁡βt∗-wt-t+k2t∗-t-wt,0+max⁡γt+wt-t∗+k2t∗-t-wt,0whereα denotes the value of travel time, β denotes the unit cost of schedule delay early, and γ denotes the unit cost of schedule delay late (0<β<α<γ). t∗ is the preferred arrival time.According to the former assumption, travelers can be divided into active travelers and negative travelers. If the number of active travelers isθN, then the number of negative travelers is (1-θ)N. If θ=1, all the travelers are active. If θ=0, all the travelers are negative. If 0<θ<1, both active travelers and negative travelers are existing. According to the division of θ, there are three situations in the bottleneck model based on personal perception: first, all the travelers are active; second, all the travelers are negative; third, both active travelers and negative travelers are existing. We will talk about these three situations in detail.


### 2.2. Personal Perceived Bottleneck Model Based on Active Travelers

In this section, this paper examines the departure time choice behavior of active travelers. At equilibrium, the driver incurs the same travel cost no matter when he leaves home. During the entire operation, the bottleneck has full capacity load operation. This condition implies that all the travelers’ generalized travel costs are the same. Lett01 and te1 be, respectively, the earliest and the latest times of rush hours. The generalized travel cost of the first active traveler is (3a)C1t01=βt∗-t01-k1t∗-t01=β-k1t∗-t01The generalized travel cost of the last active traveler is(3b)C1te1=γte1-t∗+k1te1-t∗=γ+k1te1-t∗During the entire operation, the bottleneck has full capacity load operation, and the length of the period is determined by the following formula:(4)te1-t01=NsAccording to (3a), (3b), (4), and equilibrium conditions, the equilibrium generalized travel cost C1 is obtained:(5)C1=β-k1γ+k1β+γNsThe total travel costTC1 is(6)TC1=β-k1γ+k1β+γN2sAccording to (1), (3a), (3b), and (5), t01, te1, and tn1 (being the departure time at which an individual arrives at work on time t∗) can be obtained:(7)t01=t∗-γ+k1β+γNs(8)te1=t∗+β-k1β+γNs(9)tn1=t∗-β-k1γ+k1αβ+γNsAccording to (1), (3a), (3b), (5), and (7)-(9), the waiting time function w1(t) and the departure time rate r1(t) are obtained:(10)w1t=β-k1α-β+k1t-t01,t∈t01,tn1γ+k1α+γ+k1te1-t,t∈tn1,te1(11)r1t=αsα-β+k1,t∈t01,tn1αsα+γ+k1,t∈tn1,te1


### 2.3. Personal Perceived Bottleneck Model Based on Negative Travelers

In this section, this paper examines the departure time choice behavior of negative travelers. At equilibrium, the driver incurs the same travel cost no matter when he leaves home. During the entire operation, the bottleneck has full capacity load operation. This condition implies that all the travelers’ generalized travel costs are the same. Lett02 and te2 be, respectively, the earliest and the latest times of rush hours. The generalized travel cost of the first negative traveler is(12a)C2t02=βt∗-t02+k2t∗-t02=β+k2t∗-t02The generalized travel cost of the last negative traveler is(12b)C2te2=γte2-t∗+k2te2-t∗=γ-kte2-t∗During the entire operation, the bottleneck has full capacity load operation, and the length of the period is determined by the following formula:(13)te2-t02=NsAccording to (12a), (12b), (13), and equilibrium conditions, the equilibrium generalized travel cost C2 is obtained:(14)C2=β+k2γ-k2β+γNsThe total travel costTC1:(15)TC2=β+k2γ-k2β+γN2sAccording to (2), (12a), (12b), and (14), t02, te2, and tn2 (being the departure time at which an individual arrives at work on time t∗) can be obtained:(16)t02=t∗-γ-k2β+γNs(17)te2=t∗+β+k2β+γNs(18)tn2=t∗-β+k2γ-k2αβ+γNsAccording to (12a), (12b), (14), and (16)-(18), the waiting time function w2(t) and the departure time rate r2(t) are obtained:(19)w2t=β+k2α-β-k2t-t02,t∈t02,tn2γ-k2α+γ-k2te2-t,t∈tn2,te2(20)r2t=αsα-β-k2,t∈t02,tn2αsα+γ-k2,t∈tn2,te2


### 2.4. Personal Perceived Bottleneck Model Based on Active Travelers and Negative Travelers

In the former two sections, this paper considers two extreme cases whenθ is equal to 0 or 1. The travelers’ choice behavior would be analyzed when 0<θ<1. According to the traveler arriving early or late, the traveler's travel choice behavior can be divided into three situations: the first case, all early travelers are active; all late travelers are negative; the second case, some early travelers are active; the rest are negative. In the third case, some late travelers are negative and the others are active. The following is a detailed analysis of traveler's choice behavior in these three situations.(1) In the first case, all early travelers are active; all late travelers are negative. For the early travelers, the generalized travel cost at timet can be expressed as(21a)C1t=αwt+βt∗-wt-t-k1t∗-t-wtFor the late travelers, the generalized travel cost at timet can be expressed as(21b)C2t=αwt+γt+wt-t∗+k2t∗-t-wtAt equilibrium, the traveler incurs the same travel cost no matter when he leaves home. During the entire operation, the bottleneck has full capacity load operation. This condition implies that all the travelers’ generalized travel costs are equal. Lett03 and te3 be, respectively, the earliest and the latest times of rush hours. tn3 is the departure time at which a traveler arrives at work on time t∗.At equilibrium,C′(t)=0 because all the travelers’ generalized travel costs are equal. We can get the derivative of the waiting time:(22)w31′t=β-k1α-β+k1,t∈t03,tn3-γ-k2α+γ-k2,t∈tn3,te3According to (22), the waiting time function of travelers at time t is(23)w31t=β-k1α-β+k1t-t03,t∈t03,tn3γ-k2α+γ-k2te3-t,t∈tn3,te3At equilibrium, the waiting times at timet are equal.(24)β-k1α-β+k1tn3-t03=γ-k2α+γ-k2te3-tn3In this case, active travelers can only arrive early, and negative travelers are all late. This means thattn3 is a critical value. Thus, C(tn3)=C(t03), C(tn3)=C(te3). We can obtain(25)Ct03=Cte3The generalized travel costs of the first traveler and the last traveler are(26)C1t03=β-k1t∗-t03(27)C2te3=γ-k2te3-t∗The departure time rater31(t) is obtained:(28)r31t=αα-β+k1s,t03≤t<tn3αα+γ-k2s,tn3≤t≤te3The number of active travelers and negative travelers is(29)αsα-β+k1tn3-t03=θ-N(30)αsα+γ-k2te3-tn3=1-θ-NDuring the entire operation, the bottleneck has full capacity load operation, and the length of the period is determined by the following formula:(31)te3-t03=NsAccording to (25)-(31), t03, te3, tn3, and θ- can be obtained:(32)t03=t∗-γ-k2β+γ-k1-k2Ns(33)te3=t∗+β-k1β+γ-k1-k2Ns(34)tn3=t∗-β-k1γ-k2αβ+γ-k1-k2Ns(35)θ-=γ-k2β+γ-k1-k2According to (25), (26), and (32), the equilibrium generalized travel cost of active travelers and negative travelers is obtained:(36)C1t03=C2te3=β-k1γ-k2β+γ-k1-k2NsThe illustrative departure and arrival profiles are plotted in Figure1. The horizontal axis represents travelers’ departure time while the vertical axis represents the cumulative departures and arrivals. The horizontal distance between the two curves is the queuing time while the vertical distance between the two curves is queue length. The area between the two curves is the total queuing time. Active travelers depart home in the departure time interval [t03,tn3]. Negative travelers depart home in the departure time interval [tn3,te3].Figure 1
Cumulative departures and arrivals at equilibrium in Case 1.(2) In the second case, some early travelers are active, while others are not. In this situation,θ<θ-. Active travelers in the departure time interval [t03,t3′] are early (t3′ is the dividing point between the active travelers and the negative travelers). Negative travelers in the departure time interval [t3′,tn3] are early. Negative travelers in the departure time interval [tn3,te3] are late.For the early travelers in the departure time interval[t03,t3′], the generalized travel cost at time t can be expressed as(37a)C1t=αwt+βt∗-wt-t-k1t∗-t-wtFor the early travelers in the departure time interval[t3′,tn3], the generalized travel cost at time t can be expressed as(37b)C2t=αwt+βt∗-wt-t+k2t∗-t-wtFor the late travelers in the departure time interval[tn3,te3], the generalized travel cost at time t can be expressed as(37c)C2t=αwt+γt+wt-t∗+k2t∗-t-wtAt equilibrium,C′(t)=0 because all the travelers’ generalized travel costs are equal. We can get the derivative of the waiting time:(38)w32′t=β-k1α-β+k1,t03≤t<t3′β+k2α-β-k2,t3′≤t<tn3-γ-k2α+γ-k2,tn3≤t≤te3t03≤t<t3′According to (38), the waiting time function of travelers w32(t) at time t is(39)w32t=β-k1α-β+k1t-t03,t03≤t<t3′β+k2α-β-k2t-t3′+β-k1α-β+k1t3′-t03,t3′≤t<tn3-γ-k2α+γ-k2t-te3,tn3≤t≤te3The departure time rater32(t) is obtained:(40)r32t=αα-β+k1s,t03≤t<t3′αα-β-k2s,t3′≤t<tn3αα+γ-k2s,tn3≤t≤te3The generalized travel cost of the negative travelers att3′ is(41)C2t3′=α-β-k2β-k1α-β+k1t3′-t03+β+k2t∗-t3′The generalized travel cost of the last traveler is(42)C2te3=γ-k2te3-t∗At equilibrium, all the negative travelers’ generalized travel costs are equal. We get(43)α-β-k2β-k1α-β+k1t3′-t03+β+k2t∗-t3′=γ-k2te3-t∗According to (40), the number of active travelers is(44)αα-β+k1st3′-t03=θNThe number of negative travelers is(45)αα-β-k2stn3-t3′+αα+γ-k2ste3-tn3=1-θNDuring the entire operation, the bottleneck has full capacity load operation, and the length of the period is determined by the following formula:(46)te3-t03=NsAccording to (41)-(46), t03, te3, tn3, and t3′ can be obtained:(47)t03=t∗-k1+k2θNβ+γs-γ-k2Nβ+γs(48)t3′=t∗+θNαsα-β+k1-k1+k2θNβ+γs-γ-k2Nβ+γs(49)te3=t∗+β+k2Nβ+γs-k1+k2θNβ+γs(50)tn3=t∗+Nαβ+γsγ-k2θk1+θk2-β-k2According to (47), the equilibrium generalized travel cost of active travelers is obtained:(51)C1t03=β-k1t∗-t03=β-k1k1+k2θNβ+γs+γ-k2Nβ+γsAccording to (49), the equilibrium generalized travel cost of negative travelers is obtained:(52)C2te3=γ-k2te3-t∗=γ-k2β+k2Nβ+γs-k1+k2θNβ+γsThe illustrative departure and arrival profiles are plotted in Figure2. The horizontal axis represents travelers’ departure time while the vertical axis represents the cumulative departures and arrivals. The horizontal distance between the two curves is the queuing time while the vertical distance between the two curves is the queue length. The area between the two curves is the total queuing time. Active travelers depart home in the departure time interval [t03,t3′]. Negative travelers depart home in the departure time interval [t3′,te3].Figure 2
Cumulative departures and arrivals at equilibrium in Case 2.(3) In the third case, some early travelers are negative, while others are not. In this situation,θ>θ-. The active travelers in the departure time interval [t03,tn3] are early. Active travelers in the departure time interval [tn3,t3′′] are late (t3′′ is the dividing point between the active travelers and the negative travelers). Negative travelers in the departure time interval [t3′′,te3] are late.For the early travelers in the departure time interval[t03,tn3], the generalized travel cost at time t can be expressed as(53a)C1t=αwt+βt∗-wt-t-k1t∗-t-wtFor the early travelers in the departure time interval[tn3,t3′′], the generalized travel cost at time t can be expressed as(53b)C1t=αwt+γt+wt-t∗-k1t∗-t-wtFor the late travelers in the departure time interval[t3′′,te3], the generalized travel cost at time t can be expressed as(53c)C2t=αwt+γt+wt-t∗+k2t∗-t-wtAt equilibrium,C′(t)=0 because the active travelers’ generalized travel costs and the negative travelers’ generalized travel costs are equal in their time intervals. We can get the derivative of the waiting time:(54)w33′t=β-k1α-β+k1,t03≤t<tn3-γ+k1α+γ+k1,tn3≤t<t3′′-γ-k2α+γ-k2,t3′′≤t≤te3According to (54), the waiting time function of travelers w33(t) at time t is(55)w33t=β-k1α-β+k1t-t03,t03≤t<tn3-γ+k1α+γ+k1t-t3′′-γ-k2α+γ-k2t3′′-te3,tn3≤t<t3′′-γ-k2α+γ-k2t-te3,t3′′≤t≤te3The departure time rater33(t) is obtained:(56)r33t=αα-β+k1s,t03≤t<tn3αα+γ+k1s,tn3≤t<t3′′αα+γ-k2s,t3′′≤t≤te3Similar to the second case, the waiting time att3′′ is(57)wt3′′=-γ-k2α+γ-k2t3′′-te3Thus, the generalized travel cost of active travelers att3′′ is(58)C1t3′′=α+γ+kγ-k2α+γ-k2te3-t3′′+γ+k1t3′′-t∗The first traveler is active, and the generalized travel cost belonging to him is(59)C1t03=β-k1t∗-t03At equilibrium, all the active travelers’ generalized travel costs are equal. Thus,C1(t03)=C1(t3′′):(60)β-k1t∗-t03=α+γ+k1γ-k2α+γ-k2te3-t3′′+γ+k1t3′′-t∗According to (54), the number of active travelers is(61)αα-β+k1stn3-t03+αα+γ+k1st3′′-tn3=θNThe number of negative travelers is(62)αsα+γ-k2te3-t3′′=1-θNDuring the entire operation, the bottleneck has full capacity load operation, and the length of the period is determined by the following formula:(63)te3-t03=NsAccording to (58)-(63), t03, te3, tn3, and t3′′ can be obtained:(64)t03=t∗+k1+k21-θNβ+γs-γ+k1Nβ+γs(65)te3=t∗+k1+k21-θNβ+γs+β-k1Nβ+γs(66)t3′′=t∗+k1+k21-θNβ+γs+β-k1Nβ+γs-α+γ-k21-θNαs(67)tn3=t∗-β-k1γ+θk1+θk2-k2Nαβ+γsAccording to (64), the equilibrium generalized travel cost of active travelers is obtained:(68)C1t03=β-k1t∗-t03=γ+k1β-k1Nβ+γs-k1+k2β-k11-θNβ+γsAccording to (65), the equilibrium generalized travel cost of negative travelers is obtained:(69)C2te3=γ-k2te3-t∗=k1+k21-θNβ+γs+β-k1Nβ+γsγ-k2The illustrative departure and arrival profiles are plotted in Figure3. The horizontal axis represents travelers’ departure time while the vertical axis represents the cumulative departures and arrivals. The horizontal distance between the two curves is the queuing time while the vertical distance between the two curves is queue length. The area between the two curves is the total queuing time. Active travelers depart home in the departure time interval [t03,t3′′]. Negative travelers depart home in the departure time interval [t3′′,te3].Figure 3
Cumulative departures and arrivals at equilibrium in Case 3.We present the following propositions to reveal some interesting properties of the equilibrium solution in this section.Proposition 1.
When the value of parameterθ approaches zero, the personal perception bottleneck model based on active travelers and negative travelers follows the personal perception bottleneck model based on negative travelers.(70)limθ→0t03=limθ→0t∗-k1+k2θNβ+γs-γ-k2Nβ+γs=t∗-γ-k2Nβ+γslimθ→0te3=limθ→0t∗+Ns-k1+k2θNβ+γs-γ-k2Nβ+γs=t∗+β+k2Nβ+γslimθ→0t3′=limθ→0t∗+θNαsα-β+k1-k1+k2θNβ+γs-γ-k2Nβ+γs=t∗-γ-k2Nβ+γslimθ→0tn3=limθ→0t∗+Nαβ+γsγ-k2θk1+θk2-β-k2=t∗-β+k2γ-k2αβ+γNslimθ→0w32t=β+k2α-β-k2t-t03,t∈t03,tn3γ-k2α+γ-k2te2-t,t∈tn3,te3Thus, we obtain the same traffic flow pattern as the personal perception bottleneck model based on negative travelers.Proposition 2.
When the value of parameterθ approaches one, the personal perception bottleneck model based on active travelers and negative travelers follows the personal perception bottleneck model based on active travelers.(71)limθ→1t03=limθ→1t∗+k1+k21-θNβ+γs-γ+k1Nβ+γs=t∗-γ+k1Nβ+γslimθ→1te3=limθ→1t∗+k1+k21-θNβ+γs+β-k1Nβ+γs=t∗+β-k1Nβ+γslimθ→1tn3=limθ→1t∗-β-k1γ+θk1+θk2-k2Nαβ+γs=t∗-β-k1γ+k1αβ+γNslimθ→0t3′′=limθ→0t∗+k1+k21-θNβ+γs+β-k1Nβ+γs-α+γ-k21-θNαs=t∗+β-k1Nβ+γslimθ→0w33t=β-k1α-β+k1t-t03,t∈t03,tn3γ+k1α+γ+k1te3-t,t∈tn3,te3Thus, we obtain the same traffic flow pattern as the personal perception bottleneck model based on active travelers.


## 2.1. Model Description

Let us consider a highway between a residential area and a CBD whereN travelers commute. If the arrival rate exceeds the capacity of the bottleneck on the highway, a queue develops. All individuals want to arrive at the workplace at work start time. Due to capacity, there always exist some persons with queuing time and arrive early or late. On the other hand, people consider the personal perception when they choose the departure time. Based on the previous description, the bottleneck model based on personal perception has been built by considering the traveler’s personal perception. Similar to the classical bottleneck model, the influence of free travel time is not considered.According to the former description, the general travel cost mainly includes three parts in the bottleneck model based on personal perception: queuing waiting time cost, schedule delay cost, and personal perceived cost. There exist two kinds of generalized travel cost by the active travelers and negative travelers. Here, we suppose that the personal perceived utility is a linear function of timet dependence. The personal perceived utility of active travelers isf1(t)=k1(t∗-t-w(t)), 0<k1<β. The personal perceived utility of negative travelers is f2(t)=k2(t∗-t-w(t)), 0<k2<β. Integrating the travel time, schedule delay, and personal perception utility, traveler’s generalized travel cost can be formulated as follows.The generalized travel costC1(t) of active travelers commuting who left home at time t would be expressed:(1)C1t=αwt+max⁡βt∗-wt-t-k1t∗-t-wt,0+max⁡γt+wt-t∗-k1t∗-t-wt,0The generalized travel costC2(t) of negative travelers commuting who left home at time t would be expressed:(2)C2t=αwt+max⁡βt∗-wt-t+k2t∗-t-wt,0+max⁡γt+wt-t∗+k2t∗-t-wt,0whereα denotes the value of travel time, β denotes the unit cost of schedule delay early, and γ denotes the unit cost of schedule delay late (0<β<α<γ). t∗ is the preferred arrival time.According to the former assumption, travelers can be divided into active travelers and negative travelers. If the number of active travelers isθN, then the number of negative travelers is (1-θ)N. If θ=1, all the travelers are active. If θ=0, all the travelers are negative. If 0<θ<1, both active travelers and negative travelers are existing. According to the division of θ, there are three situations in the bottleneck model based on personal perception: first, all the travelers are active; second, all the travelers are negative; third, both active travelers and negative travelers are existing. We will talk about these three situations in detail.


## 2.2. Personal Perceived Bottleneck Model Based on Active Travelers

In this section, this paper examines the departure time choice behavior of active travelers. At equilibrium, the driver incurs the same travel cost no matter when he leaves home. During the entire operation, the bottleneck has full capacity load operation. This condition implies that all the travelers’ generalized travel costs are the same. Lett01 and te1 be, respectively, the earliest and the latest times of rush hours. The generalized travel cost of the first active traveler is (3a)C1t01=βt∗-t01-k1t∗-t01=β-k1t∗-t01The generalized travel cost of the last active traveler is(3b)C1te1=γte1-t∗+k1te1-t∗=γ+k1te1-t∗During the entire operation, the bottleneck has full capacity load operation, and the length of the period is determined by the following formula:(4)te1-t01=NsAccording to (3a), (3b), (4), and equilibrium conditions, the equilibrium generalized travel cost C1 is obtained:(5)C1=β-k1γ+k1β+γNsThe total travel costTC1 is(6)TC1=β-k1γ+k1β+γN2sAccording to (1), (3a), (3b), and (5), t01, te1, and tn1 (being the departure time at which an individual arrives at work on time t∗) can be obtained:(7)t01=t∗-γ+k1β+γNs(8)te1=t∗+β-k1β+γNs(9)tn1=t∗-β-k1γ+k1αβ+γNsAccording to (1), (3a), (3b), (5), and (7)-(9), the waiting time function w1(t) and the departure time rate r1(t) are obtained:(10)w1t=β-k1α-β+k1t-t01,t∈t01,tn1γ+k1α+γ+k1te1-t,t∈tn1,te1(11)r1t=αsα-β+k1,t∈t01,tn1αsα+γ+k1,t∈tn1,te1


## 2.3. Personal Perceived Bottleneck Model Based on Negative Travelers

In this section, this paper examines the departure time choice behavior of negative travelers. At equilibrium, the driver incurs the same travel cost no matter when he leaves home. During the entire operation, the bottleneck has full capacity load operation. This condition implies that all the travelers’ generalized travel costs are the same. Lett02 and te2 be, respectively, the earliest and the latest times of rush hours. The generalized travel cost of the first negative traveler is(12a)C2t02=βt∗-t02+k2t∗-t02=β+k2t∗-t02The generalized travel cost of the last negative traveler is(12b)C2te2=γte2-t∗+k2te2-t∗=γ-kte2-t∗During the entire operation, the bottleneck has full capacity load operation, and the length of the period is determined by the following formula:(13)te2-t02=NsAccording to (12a), (12b), (13), and equilibrium conditions, the equilibrium generalized travel cost C2 is obtained:(14)C2=β+k2γ-k2β+γNsThe total travel costTC1:(15)TC2=β+k2γ-k2β+γN2sAccording to (2), (12a), (12b), and (14), t02, te2, and tn2 (being the departure time at which an individual arrives at work on time t∗) can be obtained:(16)t02=t∗-γ-k2β+γNs(17)te2=t∗+β+k2β+γNs(18)tn2=t∗-β+k2γ-k2αβ+γNsAccording to (12a), (12b), (14), and (16)-(18), the waiting time function w2(t) and the departure time rate r2(t) are obtained:(19)w2t=β+k2α-β-k2t-t02,t∈t02,tn2γ-k2α+γ-k2te2-t,t∈tn2,te2(20)r2t=αsα-β-k2,t∈t02,tn2αsα+γ-k2,t∈tn2,te2


## 2.4. Personal Perceived Bottleneck Model Based on Active Travelers and Negative Travelers

In the former two sections, this paper considers two extreme cases whenθ is equal to 0 or 1. The travelers’ choice behavior would be analyzed when 0<θ<1. According to the traveler arriving early or late, the traveler's travel choice behavior can be divided into three situations: the first case, all early travelers are active; all late travelers are negative; the second case, some early travelers are active; the rest are negative. In the third case, some late travelers are negative and the others are active. The following is a detailed analysis of traveler's choice behavior in these three situations.(1) In the first case, all early travelers are active; all late travelers are negative. For the early travelers, the generalized travel cost at timet can be expressed as(21a)C1t=αwt+βt∗-wt-t-k1t∗-t-wtFor the late travelers, the generalized travel cost at timet can be expressed as(21b)C2t=αwt+γt+wt-t∗+k2t∗-t-wtAt equilibrium, the traveler incurs the same travel cost no matter when he leaves home. During the entire operation, the bottleneck has full capacity load operation. This condition implies that all the travelers’ generalized travel costs are equal. Lett03 and te3 be, respectively, the earliest and the latest times of rush hours. tn3 is the departure time at which a traveler arrives at work on time t∗.At equilibrium,C′(t)=0 because all the travelers’ generalized travel costs are equal. We can get the derivative of the waiting time:(22)w31′t=β-k1α-β+k1,t∈t03,tn3-γ-k2α+γ-k2,t∈tn3,te3According to (22), the waiting time function of travelers at time t is(23)w31t=β-k1α-β+k1t-t03,t∈t03,tn3γ-k2α+γ-k2te3-t,t∈tn3,te3At equilibrium, the waiting times at timet are equal.(24)β-k1α-β+k1tn3-t03=γ-k2α+γ-k2te3-tn3In this case, active travelers can only arrive early, and negative travelers are all late. This means thattn3 is a critical value. Thus, C(tn3)=C(t03), C(tn3)=C(te3). We can obtain(25)Ct03=Cte3The generalized travel costs of the first traveler and the last traveler are(26)C1t03=β-k1t∗-t03(27)C2te3=γ-k2te3-t∗The departure time rater31(t) is obtained:(28)r31t=αα-β+k1s,t03≤t<tn3αα+γ-k2s,tn3≤t≤te3The number of active travelers and negative travelers is(29)αsα-β+k1tn3-t03=θ-N(30)αsα+γ-k2te3-tn3=1-θ-NDuring the entire operation, the bottleneck has full capacity load operation, and the length of the period is determined by the following formula:(31)te3-t03=NsAccording to (25)-(31), t03, te3, tn3, and θ- can be obtained:(32)t03=t∗-γ-k2β+γ-k1-k2Ns(33)te3=t∗+β-k1β+γ-k1-k2Ns(34)tn3=t∗-β-k1γ-k2αβ+γ-k1-k2Ns(35)θ-=γ-k2β+γ-k1-k2According to (25), (26), and (32), the equilibrium generalized travel cost of active travelers and negative travelers is obtained:(36)C1t03=C2te3=β-k1γ-k2β+γ-k1-k2NsThe illustrative departure and arrival profiles are plotted in Figure1. The horizontal axis represents travelers’ departure time while the vertical axis represents the cumulative departures and arrivals. The horizontal distance between the two curves is the queuing time while the vertical distance between the two curves is queue length. The area between the two curves is the total queuing time. Active travelers depart home in the departure time interval [t03,tn3]. Negative travelers depart home in the departure time interval [tn3,te3].Figure 1
Cumulative departures and arrivals at equilibrium in Case 1.(2) In the second case, some early travelers are active, while others are not. In this situation,θ<θ-. Active travelers in the departure time interval [t03,t3′] are early (t3′ is the dividing point between the active travelers and the negative travelers). Negative travelers in the departure time interval [t3′,tn3] are early. Negative travelers in the departure time interval [tn3,te3] are late.For the early travelers in the departure time interval[t03,t3′], the generalized travel cost at time t can be expressed as(37a)C1t=αwt+βt∗-wt-t-k1t∗-t-wtFor the early travelers in the departure time interval[t3′,tn3], the generalized travel cost at time t can be expressed as(37b)C2t=αwt+βt∗-wt-t+k2t∗-t-wtFor the late travelers in the departure time interval[tn3,te3], the generalized travel cost at time t can be expressed as(37c)C2t=αwt+γt+wt-t∗+k2t∗-t-wtAt equilibrium,C′(t)=0 because all the travelers’ generalized travel costs are equal. We can get the derivative of the waiting time:(38)w32′t=β-k1α-β+k1,t03≤t<t3′β+k2α-β-k2,t3′≤t<tn3-γ-k2α+γ-k2,tn3≤t≤te3t03≤t<t3′According to (38), the waiting time function of travelers w32(t) at time t is(39)w32t=β-k1α-β+k1t-t03,t03≤t<t3′β+k2α-β-k2t-t3′+β-k1α-β+k1t3′-t03,t3′≤t<tn3-γ-k2α+γ-k2t-te3,tn3≤t≤te3The departure time rater32(t) is obtained:(40)r32t=αα-β+k1s,t03≤t<t3′αα-β-k2s,t3′≤t<tn3αα+γ-k2s,tn3≤t≤te3The generalized travel cost of the negative travelers att3′ is(41)C2t3′=α-β-k2β-k1α-β+k1t3′-t03+β+k2t∗-t3′The generalized travel cost of the last traveler is(42)C2te3=γ-k2te3-t∗At equilibrium, all the negative travelers’ generalized travel costs are equal. We get(43)α-β-k2β-k1α-β+k1t3′-t03+β+k2t∗-t3′=γ-k2te3-t∗According to (40), the number of active travelers is(44)αα-β+k1st3′-t03=θNThe number of negative travelers is(45)αα-β-k2stn3-t3′+αα+γ-k2ste3-tn3=1-θNDuring the entire operation, the bottleneck has full capacity load operation, and the length of the period is determined by the following formula:(46)te3-t03=NsAccording to (41)-(46), t03, te3, tn3, and t3′ can be obtained:(47)t03=t∗-k1+k2θNβ+γs-γ-k2Nβ+γs(48)t3′=t∗+θNαsα-β+k1-k1+k2θNβ+γs-γ-k2Nβ+γs(49)te3=t∗+β+k2Nβ+γs-k1+k2θNβ+γs(50)tn3=t∗+Nαβ+γsγ-k2θk1+θk2-β-k2According to (47), the equilibrium generalized travel cost of active travelers is obtained:(51)C1t03=β-k1t∗-t03=β-k1k1+k2θNβ+γs+γ-k2Nβ+γsAccording to (49), the equilibrium generalized travel cost of negative travelers is obtained:(52)C2te3=γ-k2te3-t∗=γ-k2β+k2Nβ+γs-k1+k2θNβ+γsThe illustrative departure and arrival profiles are plotted in Figure2. The horizontal axis represents travelers’ departure time while the vertical axis represents the cumulative departures and arrivals. The horizontal distance between the two curves is the queuing time while the vertical distance between the two curves is the queue length. The area between the two curves is the total queuing time. Active travelers depart home in the departure time interval [t03,t3′]. Negative travelers depart home in the departure time interval [t3′,te3].Figure 2
Cumulative departures and arrivals at equilibrium in Case 2.(3) In the third case, some early travelers are negative, while others are not. In this situation,θ>θ-. The active travelers in the departure time interval [t03,tn3] are early. Active travelers in the departure time interval [tn3,t3′′] are late (t3′′ is the dividing point between the active travelers and the negative travelers). Negative travelers in the departure time interval [t3′′,te3] are late.For the early travelers in the departure time interval[t03,tn3], the generalized travel cost at time t can be expressed as(53a)C1t=αwt+βt∗-wt-t-k1t∗-t-wtFor the early travelers in the departure time interval[tn3,t3′′], the generalized travel cost at time t can be expressed as(53b)C1t=αwt+γt+wt-t∗-k1t∗-t-wtFor the late travelers in the departure time interval[t3′′,te3], the generalized travel cost at time t can be expressed as(53c)C2t=αwt+γt+wt-t∗+k2t∗-t-wtAt equilibrium,C′(t)=0 because the active travelers’ generalized travel costs and the negative travelers’ generalized travel costs are equal in their time intervals. We can get the derivative of the waiting time:(54)w33′t=β-k1α-β+k1,t03≤t<tn3-γ+k1α+γ+k1,tn3≤t<t3′′-γ-k2α+γ-k2,t3′′≤t≤te3According to (54), the waiting time function of travelers w33(t) at time t is(55)w33t=β-k1α-β+k1t-t03,t03≤t<tn3-γ+k1α+γ+k1t-t3′′-γ-k2α+γ-k2t3′′-te3,tn3≤t<t3′′-γ-k2α+γ-k2t-te3,t3′′≤t≤te3The departure time rater33(t) is obtained:(56)r33t=αα-β+k1s,t03≤t<tn3αα+γ+k1s,tn3≤t<t3′′αα+γ-k2s,t3′′≤t≤te3Similar to the second case, the waiting time att3′′ is(57)wt3′′=-γ-k2α+γ-k2t3′′-te3Thus, the generalized travel cost of active travelers att3′′ is(58)C1t3′′=α+γ+kγ-k2α+γ-k2te3-t3′′+γ+k1t3′′-t∗The first traveler is active, and the generalized travel cost belonging to him is(59)C1t03=β-k1t∗-t03At equilibrium, all the active travelers’ generalized travel costs are equal. Thus,C1(t03)=C1(t3′′):(60)β-k1t∗-t03=α+γ+k1γ-k2α+γ-k2te3-t3′′+γ+k1t3′′-t∗According to (54), the number of active travelers is(61)αα-β+k1stn3-t03+αα+γ+k1st3′′-tn3=θNThe number of negative travelers is(62)αsα+γ-k2te3-t3′′=1-θNDuring the entire operation, the bottleneck has full capacity load operation, and the length of the period is determined by the following formula:(63)te3-t03=NsAccording to (58)-(63), t03, te3, tn3, and t3′′ can be obtained:(64)t03=t∗+k1+k21-θNβ+γs-γ+k1Nβ+γs(65)te3=t∗+k1+k21-θNβ+γs+β-k1Nβ+γs(66)t3′′=t∗+k1+k21-θNβ+γs+β-k1Nβ+γs-α+γ-k21-θNαs(67)tn3=t∗-β-k1γ+θk1+θk2-k2Nαβ+γsAccording to (64), the equilibrium generalized travel cost of active travelers is obtained:(68)C1t03=β-k1t∗-t03=γ+k1β-k1Nβ+γs-k1+k2β-k11-θNβ+γsAccording to (65), the equilibrium generalized travel cost of negative travelers is obtained:(69)C2te3=γ-k2te3-t∗=k1+k21-θNβ+γs+β-k1Nβ+γsγ-k2The illustrative departure and arrival profiles are plotted in Figure3. The horizontal axis represents travelers’ departure time while the vertical axis represents the cumulative departures and arrivals. The horizontal distance between the two curves is the queuing time while the vertical distance between the two curves is queue length. The area between the two curves is the total queuing time. Active travelers depart home in the departure time interval [t03,t3′′]. Negative travelers depart home in the departure time interval [t3′′,te3].Figure 3
Cumulative departures and arrivals at equilibrium in Case 3.We present the following propositions to reveal some interesting properties of the equilibrium solution in this section.Proposition 1.
When the value of parameterθ approaches zero, the personal perception bottleneck model based on active travelers and negative travelers follows the personal perception bottleneck model based on negative travelers.(70)limθ→0t03=limθ→0t∗-k1+k2θNβ+γs-γ-k2Nβ+γs=t∗-γ-k2Nβ+γslimθ→0te3=limθ→0t∗+Ns-k1+k2θNβ+γs-γ-k2Nβ+γs=t∗+β+k2Nβ+γslimθ→0t3′=limθ→0t∗+θNαsα-β+k1-k1+k2θNβ+γs-γ-k2Nβ+γs=t∗-γ-k2Nβ+γslimθ→0tn3=limθ→0t∗+Nαβ+γsγ-k2θk1+θk2-β-k2=t∗-β+k2γ-k2αβ+γNslimθ→0w32t=β+k2α-β-k2t-t03,t∈t03,tn3γ-k2α+γ-k2te2-t,t∈tn3,te3Thus, we obtain the same traffic flow pattern as the personal perception bottleneck model based on negative travelers.Proposition 2.
When the value of parameterθ approaches one, the personal perception bottleneck model based on active travelers and negative travelers follows the personal perception bottleneck model based on active travelers.(71)limθ→1t03=limθ→1t∗+k1+k21-θNβ+γs-γ+k1Nβ+γs=t∗-γ+k1Nβ+γslimθ→1te3=limθ→1t∗+k1+k21-θNβ+γs+β-k1Nβ+γs=t∗+β-k1Nβ+γslimθ→1tn3=limθ→1t∗-β-k1γ+θk1+θk2-k2Nαβ+γs=t∗-β-k1γ+k1αβ+γNslimθ→0t3′′=limθ→0t∗+k1+k21-θNβ+γs+β-k1Nβ+γs-α+γ-k21-θNαs=t∗+β-k1Nβ+γslimθ→0w33t=β-k1α-β+k1t-t03,t∈t03,tn3γ+k1α+γ+k1te3-t,t∈tn3,te3Thus, we obtain the same traffic flow pattern as the personal perception bottleneck model based on active travelers.


## 3. Properties of the Personal Perceived Bottleneck Model

Proposition 3.
At equilibrium, no matter the departure time interval of active travelers or negative travelers, there has no jam phenomenon, which means that it is impossible to have both active travelers and negative travelers.Proof (Reversal Law).
According to the equilibrium conditions, the equilibrium cost of each traveler will not change at equilibrium. Suppose that at the timetx and ty, the traveler arrives at the workplace before the preferred arrival time. Assume that the travelers in the time interval [t0,t1] are active travelers, and there exist two departure times tx and ty. If the travelers at time tx and ty are active travelers, the generalized travel cost is(72)C1tx=αwtx+βt∗-wtx-tx-k1t∗-tx-wtxC1ty=αwty+βt∗-wty-ty-k1t∗-ty-wty
If the travelers at timetx and ty are negative travelers, the generalized travel cost is (73)C2tx=αwtx+βt∗-wtx-tx+k2t∗-tx-wtxC2ty=αwty+βt∗-wty-ty+k2t∗-ty-wty
The wait time oftx and ty is(74)wtx=β-k1α-β+k1tx-t03wty=β-k1α-β+k1ty-t03
Substituting this result intoC1(tx), C1(ty), C1(tx), and C1(ty), we get the generalized travel cost:(75)C1tx=βt∗-t03C1ty=βt∗-t03C2tx=α+β+k2β-k1α-β+k1tx-t03+β+k2t∗-txC2ty=α+β+k2β-k1α-β+k1ty-t03+β+k2t∗-ty
We can findC1(t1)=C1(t2),C2(t1)≠C2(t2). There is no jam phenomenon. Similarly, it is possible to prove that there are no active travelers in the departure time interval where there are negative travelers. Thus, Proposition 3 is established.Proposition 4.
At equilibrium state, the generalized travel cost for every active and negative traveler is a strictly monotonically decreasing function of the personal perceived costk1; that is, ∂C1(t03)/∂k1<0, ∂C2(t03)/∂k1<0.Proof.
For instance, according to (36), (51), and (68), θ<1 and γ>β, it is easy to verify the following:
(36):(76)∂C1t03∂k1=-γ-k22β+γ-k1-k22<0
(51):(77)∂C1t03∂k1=β-γ-2k1θNβ+γs-γ-k2Nβ+γs<0
(68):(78)∂C1t03∂k1=β-2k1θNβ+γs-γ-1-θk2Nβ+γs=Nβ+γsβ-2k1θ-γ-1-θk2<Nβ+γsβ-2k1θ-β-1-θk2=Nβ+γsθ-1β-k2-2k1θ<0
(36):(79)∂C2te3∂k1=-γ-k22β+γ-k1-k22<0
(52):(80)∂C2te3∂k1=-k1Nβ+γs<0
(69):(81)∂C2te3∂k1=-θγ-k2Nβ+γs<0which clearly shows that the active and negative traveler’s travel cost decreases with k1.


## 4. Numerical Examples

In this section, we present numerical results for the personal perception bottleneck model. According to Vickrey [1], there must be β<α<γ. Unless otherwise specified, throughout this section, we adopt the following three parameter values from Arnott, de Palma, and Lindsey [20], the unit of travel time cost α=6.4, the unit of schedule delay early β=3.9, and the unit of schedule delay late γ=15.21, and consider the situation with s=3600, N=5000, and t∗=9:00.Figure4 depicts the change of the beginning of rush hours when the proportion of active travelers changes. The solid line represents the change of the beginning of rush hours when the proportion of active travelers changes in the personal perception bottleneck model. The black dotted line is the beginning time of the rush hours in the classical bottleneck model. When θ equals 0, it is clear that the beginning of departure time in the personal perception bottleneck model is later than that in classical bottleneck model. When θ equals 0.5, it is clear that the beginning of departure time in the personal perception bottleneck model is equal to that in classical bottleneck model. According to the previous theoretical calculation, the beginning of rush hours in the mixed state is equal to that in the classical bottleneck model, and this is only when θ equals k2/(k1+k2). In this example, k1=k2=1 is assumed. That is why the beginning of departure time in the personal perceived bottleneck model equal to that in classical bottleneck model happens. When θ is more than 0.5, it is found that the starting time of the rush hours is earlier than that of the classical bottleneck model. This is because as the proportion of active travelers θ becomes larger and larger, their influence becomes greater and greater in the system. Eventually, rush hours occurred earlier and became earlier.Figure 4
Changes of the beginning of rush hours with respect to theθ.Figure5 depicts the change of the generalized travel cost and total travel cost when the proportion of active travelers changes. With the growth of θ, the cost of active travelers is increasing, while the negative traveler’s cost is decreasing. The increase rate of active traveler’s cost is less than that of the negative travelers. That is to say, the influence of the active travelers on system is greater than that of negative travelers on system. When θ is equal to 0.84, it is easy to find that the active traveler’s cost is equal to the negative traveler’s cost. The reason may be that under such circumstances all active travelers arrive early and all negative travelers arrive late. From the numerical example, we also verify the above theory. At the same time, the figure also depicts the influence of the total travel cost when the proportion of active travelers changes. The total travel costs initially decreased, but, with the number of active travelers increasing, the speed of total travel costs effectively slowed down, even to a certain extent, but the total travel costs increased.Figure 5
Changes of the travel cost with respect toθ.Figure6 depicts the change of the generalized travel cost when k1 and k2 change. Figure 6(a) depicts the change of active and negative traveler’s cost: when k1 changes, k2 is fixed. The active and negative traveler’s cost decreases with k1 increasing. This shows that active travelers can choose departure time more accurately to reduce their cost when the unit personal perception cost of active traveler increases. When active travelers change their departure time, negative travelers change their departure time choice behavior, making travel cost lower. Figure 6(b) depicts the change of active and negative traveler’s cost: when k2 changes, k1 is fixed. Active traveler’s cost is reduced slightly, and negative traveler’s cost is increased slightly. This means that the influence of k2 is not as great as we think, because negative travelers are starting after active travelers. This also means that the unit personal perception cost of negative traveler has less effect on the system than that of the active traveler.Figure 6
Changes of the generalized travel cost with respect tok1 and k2.
(a) (b)


## 5. Conclusions

Based on the classical bottleneck model, this paper establishes a bottleneck model based on personal perception by considering the influence of personal perception on departure time selection. For travelers, some prefer to arrive early, called active travelers, while some are not likely to arrive early, called negative travelers. This paper mainly studies the departure time choice behavior of travelers under these two travel attitudes. It is concluded that the bottleneck model based on personal perception can accurately describe the departure time choice behavior of travelers, which are not only related to the proportion of each type of travelers, but also related to the size of travel perception. This paper mainly considers the departure time choice behavior of travelers but does not take into consideration the impact of congestion pricing and other related strategies on travelers. These will be the contents of our next research.



---

*Source: 6184827-2019-04-01.xml*