# Delay-Dependent Robust Stabilization for Nonlinear Large Systems via Decentralized Fuzzy Control

Authors: Chun-xia Dou; Zhi-sheng Duan; Xing-bei Jia; Xiao-gang Li; Jin-zhao Yang; Ting Gui; Ye-fei Bi
Journal: Mathematical Problems in Engineering
 (2011)

---

## Abstract

A delay-dependent robust fuzzy control approach is developed for a class of nonlinear uncertain interconnected time delay large systems in this paper. First, an equivalent T–S fuzzy model is extended in order to accurately represent nonlinear dynamics of the large system. Then, a decentralized state feedback robust controller is proposed to guarantee system stabilization with a prescribedH∞ disturbance attenuation level. Furthermore, taking into account the time delays in large system, based on a less conservative delay-dependent Lyapunov function approach combining with linear matrix inequalities (LMI) technique, some sufficient conditions for the existence of H∞ robust controller are presented in terms of LMI dependent on the upper bound of time delays. The upper bound of time-delay and minimized H∞ performance index can be obtained by using convex optimization such that the system can be stabilized and for all time delays whose sizes are not larger than the bound. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed controller is demonstrated through simulation example.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In recent years, interconnected large systems are very common in various fields, such as power systems, industrial processes, and spacecraft dynamics. In interconnected large systems, even if their subsystems have tractable models and interact with respective neighbors in a simple and predictable fashion, the entire systems often display rich and complex nonlinear behavior. Furthermore, due to the physical configuration and the high dimensionality, information transmission delays commonly exist in the interconnected large systems too. Over the past decade and before, the stability analysis and synthesis of large systems have been widely studied, and many different approaches have been proposed to stabilize these systems. For instance, in [1], general modeling and control method of large-scale systems is presented. Stabilization method of eigenvalue assignment for interconnected systems is proposed based on local feedback in [2]. References [3] and [4] display stability analysis and synthesis of large systems with time delay via Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy models, respectively. In [5] and [6], delay-dependent robust stability and LMI-based stability for fuzzy large-scale systems with time delays are researched, respectively. In [7], a nonlinear decentralized state feedback controller is presented for uncertain fuzzy time delay interconnected systems. The studies mentioned above indicate that in order to facilitate real engineering application, it is a prime requirement to transform the nonlinear models of large systems to linear models so as to enable them to be applicable into controller design. However, linearization technique and linear robust control method are obviously incompetent for controlling the complex nonlinear behavior of large systems, because the nonlinear behavior plays vital role during the transient state of the systems and often degrades system stability and dynamic performances. As an effective means, the nonlinear control schemes are also presented in the studies mentioned above. But, the nonlinear control schemes are so complicated that they are unfeasible for real applications. And they also post additional difficulties to controller design. So far, stabilization problem for complex large systems is still a baffling issue.In general, due to the physical configuration and the high dimensionality, it is difficult to design a global centralized controller for large systems. And a centralized control is neither feasible nor economical. Due to decentralized control means that each subsystem is controlled independently on its locally available information, this control scheme is preferred in wide area control of large system. Many researchers have paid a great deal of attention on decentralized controllers for large systems. For instance, decentralized stabilizers for large interconnected power systems are designed in [8] and [9], respectively. In [10], robust stabilization is researched for interconnected large systems based on decentralized fuzzy control scheme. In [7] and [11], decentralized state feedback and decentralized guaranteed cost control are presented for large-scale systems, respectively. All the results mentioned above indicate that decentralized control scheme is more feasible and effective strategy for stabilization problem research of interconnected large systems.Furthermore, in many cases, it is very complicated and difficult, even not possible to obtain the accurate nonlinear model of large systems. However, the nonlinearities should be precisely approximated as they play vital role during the transient state of the system. In order to facilitate real engineering application, in recent year, fuzzy logic model with if-then rules has become one of the most useful modeling approaches for complex systems [12, 13]. The fuzzy-logic-based approach has the capability of approximating nonlinear processes to arbitrary accurate degrees so as to enable the fuzzy logic model to be applicable to system control [14, 15]. Therefore, in order to effectively handle the stabilization problem for complex large systems, it is a straightforward idea to extend the T-S models that are interconnected, time delay, and uncertain to represent large systems. The modeling procedure of fuzzy logic model with if-then rules is given as follows: first, a nonlinear large system is decomposed into a number of interconnected subsystems. Each subsystem again is decomposed into a set of fuzzy regions, and in each region, local dynamic behavior of the subsystem is described by a T-S fuzzy model. Then, each subsystem dynamic is captured by a set of fuzzy implications that characterize local relations in the state space. Finally, the entire model of the nonlinear large system can be achieved by smoothly connecting the local linear model in each fuzzy subspace together via the membership functions. The method of T-S model can provide an effective solution to the control of complex large systems that are nonlinear, interconnected, time delay, and uncertain.Studying the stabilization problem for large systems, it cannot avoid taking into consideration the transmission delays. The stabilization problem for time delay systems can be classified into two types: delay-independent stabilization and delay-dependent stabilization. The delay-independent stabilization for linear time delay system has been extensively studied by many researchers for the last decades. However, it is considered more conservative in general than the delay-dependent case, especially for time delay systems whose delay size is not actually small [4]. Many researchers also realize it necessary to develop delay-dependent stabilization method into control area of complex large systems that are nonlinear, interconnected, time delay, and uncertain. But, so far there are seldom relational contributions, mainly due to the complex nonlinear behavior in the systems bring huge complication to controller design.In this paper, in order to effectively solve stabilization problem for complex large systems, we rigorously develop a less conservative delay-dependent robust stabilization method into the wide area control area of the large systems that are nonlinear, interconnected, time delay, and uncertain. The research is decomposed in several stages, starting with extending the T-S model that is interconnected, time delay, and uncertain to accurately represent nonlinear processes of the large systems. On the next stage, we propose a decentralized state-feedback fuzzy controller. Based on delay-dependent Lyapunov functional approach integrating theH∞ robust control technique, some sufficient conditions for existence of the controller can be cast into the feasible problem of LMIs dependent on the upper bound size of time delays, by which the system can be robustly stabilized for all considered uncertainties and time delays whose sizes are not larger than their bounds. On the final stage, a procedure is also given to select suitable controller parameters that are optimal in the sense of minimizing the guaranteed H∞ performance index by the modified generalized eigenvalue minimization problem technique in Matlab. The proposed method effectively handles the problems related to nonlinearities, time delays and uncertainties in large systems so as to enable controller to be more feasible and effective for real engineering application, which is a considerable contribution. The effectiveness of the proposed control method is demonstrated through simulation examples.The paper is organized as follows. The problem is first formulated in Section2. The delay-dependent stabilization problem via decentralized fuzzy controller is studied in Section 3. In Section 4, simulation case is provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Finally, concluding remarks are given in Section 5.


## 2. Problem Formulation

Consider a class of nonlinear uncertain time delay large systems which are interconnected byN subsystems as follows: (2.1)ẋi(t)=fi(xi(t),xi(t-τii),ui(t),ωi(t))+Δfi(xi(t),xi(t-τii),ui(t),ωi(t))+∑j=1,j≠iN[fij(xj(t),xj(t-τij))+Δfij(xj(t),xj(t-τij))],yi(t)=gi(xi(t),ωi(t))+Δgi(xi(t),ωi(t)),xi(t)=φi(t),t∈[-τii,0],xj(t)=φj(t),t∈[-τij,0],0<τii,τij≤τ̅,
where  xi(t)∈Rni, xj(t)∈Rnj are state vectors of the ith and jth subsystems, respectively, i,j=1,2,…,N. ui(t)∈Rmi is control input. yi(t) and ωi(t) are controlled output and external disturbance of the ith subsystem, respectively. fi(·), gi(·), Δfi(·), Δgi(·), fij(·), and Δfij(·) are the smooth nonlinear functions. fij(·) and Δfij(·) denote the interconnection functions between the ith and jth subsystem, Δfi(·), Δgi(·), and Δfij(·) represent uncertainties in the ith subsystem model. τii and τij are the constant but unknown delay in the states, τ̅ is the upper bound value of all time delays.Here, the T-S fuzzy model is extended to represent the system (2.1). The model is described by fuzzy if-then rules in the following form.Thekth rule of T-S fuzzy model for the ith subsystem: Rik: If zi1(t) is Fk1,…, and zigi(t) is Fkgi, Then,(2.2)ẋi(t)=Aikxi(t)+Adikxi(t-τii)+B1ikui(t)+B2ikωi(t)+ΔAikxi(t)+ΔAdikxi(t-τii)+ΔB1ikui(t)+ΔB2ikωi(t)+∑j=1,j≠iN[Aijkxj(t)+Adijkxj(t-τij)+ΔAijkxj(t)+ΔAdijkxj(t-τij)],yi(t)=Cikxi(t)+ΔCikxi(t)+Dikωi(t)+ΔDikωi(t),
where  k=1,2,…,l, l is the number of if-then rules Fk1,…,Fkgi are the fuzzy sets; zi1(t),…,zigi(t) are the premise variables. Aik, Adik, Aijk, Adijk, B1ik, B2ik, Cik, and Dik are constant coefficient matrices with appropriate dimensions. ΔAik, ΔAdik, ΔAijk, ΔAdijk, ΔB1ik, ΔB2ik, ΔCik, and ΔDik are uncertain matrices with appropriate dimensions.Then, the overall fuzzy model of theith subsystem can be rearranged in the following form:(2.3)ẋi(t)=∑k=1lhk(zi(t)){∑j=1,j≠iNAikxi(t)+Adikxi(t-τii)+B1ikui(t)+B2ikωi(t)+ΔAikxi(t)+ΔAdikxi(t-τii)+ΔB1ikui(t)+ΔB2ikωi(t)+∑j=1,j≠iN[Aijkxj(t)+Adijkxj(t-τij)+ΔAijkxj(t)+ΔAdijkxj(t-τij)]},yi(t)=∑k=1lhk(zi(t)){Cikxi(t)+ΔCikxi(t)+Dikωi(t)+ΔDikωi(t)},xi(t)=φi(t),t∈[-τii,0],xj(t)=φj(t),t∈[-τij,0],
where  μk(zi(t))=∏j=1giFkj(zij(t)),hk(zi(t))=μk(zi(t))/∑k=1lμk(zi(t)),zi(t)=[zi1(t),zi2(t),…,zigi(t)], and Fkgi(zigi(t)) is the grade of membership of zigi(t) in Fkgi. Assume that μk(z(t))≥0, for k=1,2,…,l and all t. Then, hk(z(t))≥0, for k=1,2,…,l, and ∑k=1lhk(z(t))=1.


## 3. Delay-Dependent Robust Stabilization via Decentralized Fuzzy Control

In the following, if not stated, matrices are assumed to have compatible dimensions. The identify and zero matrices are denoted byI and 0, respectively. The notation * always denotes the symmetric block in one symmetric matrix. The standard notation >(<) is used to denote the positive (negative) definite ordering of matrices. Inequality X>Y shows that the matrix X-Y is positive definite.First, the decentralized fuzzy controller is designed to deal with the robust stabilization problem for the above system in the following form:(3.1)Rik:Ifzi1(t)isFk1,…,andzigi(t)isFkgi,thenui(t)=Kikxi(t).
Then, the overall controller has the form (3.2)ui(t)=∑k=1lhk(zi(t))Kikxi(t).Substituting (3.2) into (2.3) yields the ith closed-loop decentralized controlled subsystem as follows: (3.3)ẋi(t)=∑k=1l∑m=1lhk(zi(t))hm(zi(t))×{∑j=1,j≠iN(Aik+BikKim)xi(t)+Adikxi(t-τii)+ΔAdikxi(t-τii)+B2ikωi(t)+ΔB2ikωi(t)+(ΔAik+ΔBikKim)xi(t)+∑j=1,j≠iN[Aijkxj(t)+Adijkxj(t-τij)+ΔAijkxj(t)+ΔAdijkxj(t-τij)]},yi(t)=∑k=1lhk(zi(t))[Cikxi(t)+ΔCikxi(t)+Dikωi(t)+ΔDikωi(t)],xi(t)=φi(t),t∈[-τii,0],xj(t)=φj(t),t∈[-τij,0].Here, the uncertainties in the system are represented by the uncertain matrices with appropriate dimensions. We may make the following assumption concerning the uncertain matrices.Assumption 1 (see [16]).
The uncertainties considered here are norm-bounded in the form(3.4)[ΔAikΔB1ikΔAdikΔAijkΔAdijkΔB2ikΔCikΔDik]=HikFik(t)[E1ikE2ikE3ikE4ijkE5ijkE6ikE7ikE8ik],
where  Hik,E1ik,E2ik,E3ik,E4ijk,E5ijk,E6ik,E7ik,   and E8ik are the real constant matrices known of appropriate dimensions and Fik(t) is an unknown matrix function with Lebesgue-measurable elements and satisfies FikT(t)Fik(t)≤I.Accordingly, substituting (3.4) into (3.3) yields the ith closed-loop decentralized controlled subsystem as follows:(3.5)ẋi(t)=∑k=1l∑m=1lhk(zi(t))hm(zi(t))×{∑j=1,j≠iN[Aik+B1ikKim+HikFik(t)(E1ik+E2ikKim)]xi(t)+(Adik+HikFik(t)E3ik)xi(t-τii)+∑j=1,j≠iN[(Aijk+HikFik(t)E4ijk)xj(t)+(Adijk+HikFik(t)E5ijk)xj(t-τij)]+(B2ik+HikFik(t)E6ik)ωi(t)∑j=1,j≠iN},yi(t)=∑k=1lhk(zi(t))[(Cik+HikFik(t)E7ik)xi(t)+(Dik+HikFik(t)E8ik)ωi(t)].
Equation (3.5) can be rearranged in the following form:
(3.6)ẋi(t)=∑k=1l∑m=1lhk(zi(t))hm(zi(t))×{∑j=1,j≠iN[Aik+B1ikKim+HikFik(t)(E1ik+E2ikKim)+Adik+HikFik(t)E3ik]xi(t)-(Adik+HikFik(t)E3ik)∫t-τiitẋi(α)dα+∑j=1,j≠iN[(Aijk+HikFik(t)E4ijk)xj(t)+(Adijk+HikFik(t)E5ijk)xj(t-τij)]+(B2ik+HikFik(t)E6ik)ωi(t)∑j=1,j≠iN},yi(t)=∑k=1lhk(zi(t))[(Cik+HikFik(t)E7ik)xi(t)+(Dik+HikFik(t)E8ik)ωi(t)].Let us define a delay-independent Lyapunov function for the system (3.6) as(3.7)Vi(t)=Vi1(t)+Vi2(t)+Vi3(t),Vi1(t)=xiT(t)Piixi(t),Vi2(t)=∫t-τiitxiT(τ)Siixi(τ)dτ,Vi3(t)=∫-τii0∫t+βtẋiT(α)Ziiẋi(α)dαdβ,
where  Pii, Sii, Zii are symmetric positive definite weighting matrices.Furthermore, for robust stabilization purpose,H∞ performance related to the controlled output is proposed in the following form:(3.8)Ji=∫0tf[ρi-1yiT(t)yi(t)-ρiωiT(t)ωi(t)]dt.
Considering the initial condition, the H∞ performance can be rewritten as follows:(3.9)∫0tfyiT(t)yi(t)dt≤ρi2∫0tfωiT(t)ωi(t)dt+Vi(0),
where  ρi is a prescribed attenuation level.Remark 3.1.
The physical meaning of (3.9) is that the every time delay interconnected subsystem is stable in the sense of Lyapunov, and the effect of any ωi(t) on output yi(t) must be attenuated below a desire level ρi from the viewpoint of energy. No matter what ωi(t) is, the L2 gain from ωi(t) to yi(t) must be equal to or less than a prescribed value ρi2. The H∞ performance with a prescribed attenuation level is useful for a robust design without knowledge of ωi(t).Remark 3.2.
The purpose of this study is to guarantee stability of the system (3.6) via the decentralized fuzzy controller (3.2). Thereafter, the attenuation level ρi can also be minimized so that the H∞ performance as (3.9) is reduced as small as possible for all ωi(t) and i=1,2,…,N.The following lemmas will play important roles in obtaining results in this paper. We show them as follows.Lemma 3.3 (see [16]).
For all vectorsa and b matrices N, X, Y, and Z with appropriate dimensions, if [XYYTZ]≥0, one has
(3.10)-2aTNb≤inf⁡X,Y,Z{[ab]T[XY-NYT-NTZ][ab]},
where  X and Z are symmetrical positive matrices.Lemma 3.4 (see [17]).
For matrices (or vectors)Y, D, and E with appropriate dimensions, one has
(3.11)Y+DFE+ETFTDT<0,
where  Y is a symmetric matrix. For all F satisfy FTF≤I, if and only if a set of scalar quantity ε>0 exist, one gains
(3.12)Y+εDDT+ε-1ETE<0.Based on delay-dependent Lyapunov function integrating theH∞ performance, some sufficient conditions for the system robust stabilization are shown in Theorem 3.5.Theorem 3.5.
The interconnected uncertain time delay fuzzy system (3.6) is asymptotically stable via the decentralized fuzzy controller in (3.2) and satisfies the H∞ control performance in (3.9) for a prescribed ρi2 when ωi(t)≠0, only if Pii=PiiT>0, Sii=SiiT>0, Zii=ZiiT>0, are the common solutions of the following matrix inequalities for i,j=1,2,…,N(j≠i) and k,m=1,2,…,l[XiiYiiYiiTZii]≥0, and
(3.13)[ZijkmẐikZ⌢ijkZ̅ijkZ̆ikΦikmT(Cik+HikFik(t)E7ik)T*-Sii000[Adik+HikFik(t)E3ik]T0**000[Aijk+HikFik(t)E4ijk]T0***00[Adijk+HikFik(t)E5ijk]T0****-ρi2[B2ik+HikFik(t)E6ik]T(Dik+HikFik(t)E8ik)T*****-τ̅-1Zii-10******-I]≤0,
where
(3.14)Zikm=Pii[Aik+B1ikKim+HikFik(t)(E1ik+E2ikKim)]+[Aik+B1ikKim+HikFik(t)(E1ik+E2ikKim)]TPii+τ̅Xii+Yii+YiiT+Sii,Ẑik=Pii(Adik+HikFik(t)E3ik)-Yii,Z⌢ijk=Pii(Aijk+HikFik(t)E4ijk),Z̅ijk=Pii(Adijk+HikFik(t)E5ijk),Z̆ik=Pii(B2ik+HikFik(t)E6ik),Φikm=Aik+B1ikKim+HikFik(t)(E1ik+E2ikKim).The proof is introduced in AppendixA.There is an unknown matrix functionFik(t) in (3.13), let us deal with the parameter uncertainty problem as follow.Theorem 3.6.
The uncertain interconnected fuzzy system with time delays (3.6) is asymptotically stable via the decentralized fuzzy controller in (3.2) and satisfies the H∞ performance in (3.9) with a prescribed ρi2, only if a set of scalar quantity εi>0, γi>0 and matrices Pii=PiiT>0, Sii=SiiT>0, Zii=ZiiT>0 are the common solutions of the following matrix inequalities: [XiiYiiYiiTZii]≥0, and
(3.15)[Zikm′Ẑik′Z⌢ijk′Z̅ijk′Z̆ik′(Aik+B1ikKim)TCikTPiiHik0(E1ik+E2ikKim)TE5ikT*-Sii000AdikT000E3ikT0**000AijkT000E4ijkT0***00AdijkT000E5ijkT0****-ρi2IB2ikTDikT00E6ikTE6ikT*****-τ̅-1Zii-10Hik000******-I0Hik00*******-εi-1I000********-γi-1I00*********-εiI0**********-γiI]≤0,
where
(3.16)Zikm′=Pii[Aik+B1ikKim]+[Aik+B1ikKim]TPii+τ̅Xii+Yii+YiiT+Sii,Ẑik′=PiiAdik-Yii,Z⌢ijk′=PiiAijk,Z̅ijk′=PiiAdijk,Z̆ik′=PiiB2ik.The proof of Theorem3.6 is easy to obtain. By Lemma 3.4 and Schur decomposition [19], the inequality (3.13) is equivalent to the inequality (3.15).The inequality (3.15) just relates into the upper bound size of time delays and determined norm-bounds of uncertainties. However it is not linear, let us left multiply and right multiply matrix Wii=diag{pii-1,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I}, (3.15) is equivalent to LMI (3.17)
(3.17)[Zikm′′Ẑik′′AijkAdijkB2ik(AikX̅ii+B1ikY̅im)T(CikX̅ii)THik0(E1ikX̅ii+E2ikY̅im)T(E5ikX̅ii)T*-Sii000AdikT000E3ikT0**000AijkT000E4ijkT0***00AdijkT000E5ijkT0****-ρi2IB2ikTDikT00E6ikTE6ikT*****-τ̅-1Zii-10Hik000******-I0Hik00*******-εi-1I000********-γi-1I00*********-εiI0**********-γiI]≤0,
where
(3.18)Zikm′′=[AikX̅ii+B1ikY̅im]+[AikX̅ii+B1ikY̅im]T+τiiX̃ii+Ỹii+ỸiiT+S̃ii,X̃ii=Pii-1XiiPii-1,X̅ii=Pii-1,Ỹii=Pii-1YiiPii-1,S̃ii=Pii-1SiiPii-1,Y̅im=KimPii-1,Ẑik′′=Adik-X̅iiYii=Adik-Ŷii.Remark 3.7.
To obtain better robust performance, theH∞ control performance can be treated as the following minimization problem so that the H∞ performance in (3.9) is reduced as small as possible
(3.19)J*=min⁡[αi+Trace(Mi)+Trace(Θi)+Trace(Λi)]s.t.(i)Theinequality(3.17),(ii)[XiiYiiYiiTZii]≥0,(iii)[-αixiT(0)xi(0)-Xii]<0,(iv)[-ΘiΠiTΠi-Sii-1]<0,(v)[-ΛiΨiTΨi-Zii-1]<0,(vi)[-MiNiTNi-ρi-2I]<0,
where
(3.20)∫0tfωiT(t)ωi(t)dt=NiTNi,∫-τii0φiT(t)φi(t)dt=ΠiTΠi,∫-τii0∫β0φ̇iT(α)φ̇i(α)dαdβ=ΨiTΨi.
The minimization problem in (3.19) can be transformed into LMI optimization problem. By convex optimization techniques of LMI via MATLAB tool boxes, the H∞ performance index is minimized, and the parameters of controller are obtained. Thereafter, the fuzzy decentralized controller in (3.2) is designed.


## 4. Simulation Example

We consider a four-machine power system that is a typical nonlinear interconnected uncertain large system as shown in Figure1 to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed control method via the dynamic responses after faults. The dynamic equations of each synchronous generator are expressed as follows [19]:
(4.1)δ̇i(t)=ωi(t)-ω0,ω̇i(t)=ω0MiPmi-DiMi(ωi(t)-ω0)-ω0MiPei(t),Ėqi′(t)=-1Tdoi′[Eqi′(t)+Idi(t)(xdi-xdi′)]+1Tdoi′Vfi(t),yi1(t)=δi(t),yi2(t)=Pei(t),
where  i=1,2,3,4, is the number of generator(4.2)Pei(t)=Eqi′(t)∑j=1NEqj′(t-τij)[Bijsin(δi(t)-δj(t-τij))+Gijcos⁡(δi(t)-δj(t-τij))],Idi(t)=∑j=1NEqj′(t-τij)[Gijsin(δi(t)-δj(t-τij))-Bijcos⁡(δi(t)-δj(t-τij))].Figure 1
Four-machine interconnected power system.The generator parameter notions are introduced in AppendixB. The system parameter values used in the simulation are given in Tables 1 and 2.Table 1
Synchronous generator parameters.
ParameterGenerator 1Generator 2Generator 3Generator 4xd p.u.1.8432.4322.6542.076xd′ p.u.0.2540.3020.3650.282xT p.u.0.1230.1150.1320.142xad p.u.1.7231.7231.7231.723Tdo′ p.u.6.457.688.247.04M s4.05.26.44.5D p.u.5.03.03.04.5Pm p.u.1.001.101.151.05ω0 rad/s314.159Table 2
Transformer parameters.
BusResist.React.BusResist.React.1–30.00340.02007–90.0114−0.05521–40.00670.03508-90.0098−0.04303–60.0123−0.04508–140.0072−0.03425-60.0087−0.03209–130.00230.02155–90.1376−0.654310–120.0069−0.03076–70.1203−0.512011-120.1480−0.60567-80.0033−0.01609-100.00820.0429The decentralized coordinated excitation control input limitations are(4.3)-3≤vfi=ulpss(t)+uspss(t)≤6,i=1,2,3,4.The fault considered in the simulation is a symmetrical three-phase short circuit fault that occurs on the transmission line between the bus-6 and the bus-7.ζ is the fraction of the line to the left of the fault. If ζ=0, the fault is on the bus bar of no. 6, ζ=0.5 puts the fault in the middle of the bus-6 and the bus-7. The fault sequence considered is the following.Stage 1.
The system is in prefault steady state.Stage 2.
A fault occurs att=0.1s.Stage 3.
The fault is removed by opening the breakers of the faulted line att=0.25 s.Stage 4.
The transmission lines are restored with the fault cleared att=1.0 s.Stage 5.
The system is in post-fault state.The triangle type membership functions are proposed for the fuzzy logic model with if-then rules in this paper. To minimize the design effort and complexity, we try to use as few rules as possible to represent the system. Here, considering the paper length, the coefficient matrices of the T-S fuzzy model are not displayed. For simulation study, four operating points are selected as follows.Case 1.
The operating points are(4.4)[δ10δ20δ30δ40]=[54.18°54.35°54.30°53.24°]=[z11z21z31z41],[Pm10Pm20Pm30pm40]=[1.101.101.051.05]p.u.=[z12z22z32z42],[Vt1Vt2Vt3Vt4]=[1.041.021.011.02]p.u.=[z13z23z33z43],Case 2.
The operating points are(4.5)[δ10δ20δ30δ40]=[32.98°33.22°31.35°35.11°]=[z11z21z31z41],[Pm10Pm20Pm30pm40]=[0.300.400.300.35]p.u.=[z12z22z32z42],[Vt1Vt2Vt3Vt4]=[0.830.870.850.84]p.u.=[z13z23z33z43],Case 3.
The operating points are(4.6)[δ10δ20δ30δ40]=[41.84°40.12°40.65°41.15°]=[z11z21z31z41],[Pm10Pm20Pm30pm40]=[0.900.920.910.90]p.u.=[z12z22z32z42],[Vt1Vt2Vt3Vt4]=[0.940.930.930.94]p.u.=[z13z23z33z43],Case 4.
The operating points are(4.7)[δ10δ20δ30δ40]=[71.24°72.75°73.31°71.23°]=[z11z21z31z41],[Pm10Pm20Pm30pm40]=[1.101.001.101.00]p.u.=[z12z22z32z42],[Vt1Vt2Vt3Vt4]=[1.011.011.021.01]p.u.=[z13z23z33z43],Next, we will test the effectiveness of proposed controller at different fault locations.We solve the control parameters using the LMI optimization toolbox in Matlab. When the operating points are chosen in Case1, we find that the system is robustly stable for any constant time delays that satisfy 0≤τ̅≤1.5643s. Figures 2, 3, and 4 compares the power angles of the generators no. 2 and no. 3 with different fault locations: ζ=0.05, ζ=0.50, ζ=0.95.Figure 2
The responses of power angle of the generator no. 2 and no. 3 with fault locationζ=0.05 (The solid line: the generator no. 2, the dotted line: the generator no. 3).Figure 3
The responses of power angle of the generator no. 2 and no. 3 with fault locationζ=0.50 (The solid line: the generator no. 2, the dotted line: the generator no. 3).Figure 4
The responses of power angle of the generator no. 2 and no. 3 with fault locationζ=0.95 (The solid line: the generator no. 2, the dotted line: the generator no. 3).From the results shown above, it can be shown that the proposed decentralized controller can rapidly damp down power angle oscillation of the generators no. 2 and no. 3 at different fault locations.In Figure5, the power angle responses of generator no. 2 are shown, respectively, for different maximum time delays with ζ=0.50 in Case 2. It can be seen from Figure 5 that the proposed controller still ensures sufficient damping of system oscillation and keep the system stable regardless of variations of maximum time delay. It demonstrates that the delay-dependent method is effective for all time delay whose sizes are not larger than the upper bound.Figure 5
The responses of power angle of the generator no. 2 with fault locationζ=0.50 (line no. 1: maximum time delays are 100 ms; line no. 2: maximum time delays are 400 ms; line no. 3: maximum time delays are 40 ms; line no. 4: maximum time delays are 200 ms).When the operating points are chose in Case3, the power angle responses of all generators with ζ=1.0 are given in Figure 6.Figure 6
The power angle responses of the all generator with fault locationζ=1.0 (Line no. 1: the generator no. 1; line no. 2: the generator no. 2; line no. 3: the generator no. 3; line no. 4: the generator no. 4).It can be seen from Figure6 that not only the generator no. 2 and no. 3 settle down quickly, but also the others have better dynamic performances by the proposed controller.The terminal voltages of the generator no. 2 and no. 3 with fault locationζ=0.30 are shown in Figure 7. From the results of Figure 7, it can be shown that the proposed control scheme guarantees better voltage quality.Figure 7
Terminal voltages of generators no. 2 and no. 3 with fault locationζ=0.30 (The solid line: the generator no. 2, the dotted line: the generator no. 3).


## 5. Conclusion

Based on decentralized state feedback control structure, a delay-dependentH∞ robust fuzzy control method is presented for stabilization performance enhancement of the large systems that are nonlinear, interconnected, time delay, and uncertain by using T-S fuzzy model. The main contribution of this paper is to effectively deal with the problems related to nonlinearities, time delays and uncertainties in large systems so that the system can be stabilized for all considered uncertainties and time delays whose sizes are not larger than their upper bounds. Another contribution is that the sufficient conditions for existence of the controller are transformed into the problem of LMIs, by which the H∞ performance index and control parameters can be solved efficiently and rapidly by using convex optimization techniques via the available LMI toolbox. It enables controller to be more feasible and convenient for real engineering application. The proposed robust control scheme is demonstrated on a large four-machine power system. Simulation results have shown that the dynamic performance of the system is greatly improved regardless of different operating points, various time delays and faults in different locations.



---

*Source: 605794-2011-06-04.xml*