# Tyrosinase Inhibitory Effect and Antioxidative Activities of Fermented and Ethanol Extracts ofRhodiola rosea and Lonicera japonica

Authors: Yuh-Shuen Chen; Hua-Chian Liou; Chin-Feng Chan
Journal: The Scientific World Journal
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

This is the first study to investigate the biological activities of fermented extracts ofRhodiola rosea L. (Crassulaceae) and Lonicera japonica Thunb. (Caprifoliaceae). Alcaligenes piechaudii CC-ESB2 fermented and ethanol extracts of Rhodiola rosea and Lonicera japonica were prepared and the antioxidative activities of different concentrations of samples were evaluated using in vitro antioxidative assays. Tyrosinase inhibition was determined by using the dopachrome method with L-DOPA as substrate. The results demonstrated that inhibitory effects (ED50 values) on mushroom tyrosinase of fermented Rhodiola rosea, fermented Lonicera japonica, ethanol extract of Lonicera japonica, and ethanol extract of Rhodiola rosea were 0.78, 4.07, 6.93, and >10 mg/ml, respectively. The DPPH scavenging effects of fermented Rhodiola rosea (ED50 = 0.073 mg/ml) and fermented Lonicera japonica (ED50 = 0.207 mg/ml) were stronger than effects of their respective ethanol extracts. Furthermore, the scavenging effect increases with the presence of high content of total phenol. However, the superoxide scavenging effects of fermented Rhodiola rosea was less than effects of fermented Lonicera japonica. The results indicated that fermentation of Rhodiola rosea and Lonicera japonica can be considered as an effective biochemical process for application in food, drug, and cosmetics.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Oxidative stress has been demonstrated to cause atherosclerosis, diabetes mellitus, aging, and even cancer [1]. It has been reported that sufficient intake of antioxidants, such as green tea, may be necessary to repress oxidative stress and prevent disease and aging [2].Tyrosinase, a copper-containing polyphenol oxidase, plays a highly critical role in forming melanin pigments [3]. Previous reports have shown that tyrosinase might also be involved in neuromelanin production and be associated with Parkinson’s disease [4]. Therefore, inhibiting tyrosinase activity is applicable to skin-lightening and in preventing neurodegeneration [4]. A broad spectrum of potent tyrosinase inhibitors, including ascorbic acid and its derivatives [5], thiol-containing amino acids (such as cysteine) [5], and different classes of phenolic compounds [3, 6], have been obtained from natural products [3].This study investigated the tyrosinase inhibitory effect of two herbal medicines,Rhodiola rosea L. (Crassulaceae) and Lonicera japonica Thunb. (Caprifoliaceae). Rhodiola rosea exhibits various biological activities, such as antioxidative, antidepressant, anticancer, and neuroprotective effects [7, 8]. Lonicera japonica is used to treat exopathogenic wind-heat, epidemic febrile diseases, sores, neurodegeneration, and infectious diseases [9, 10]. In the past few years, fermented preparation of natural products has been proven to be useful in promoting gastrointestinal health and skincare [11], protecting against ethanol-induced toxicity [12], and enhancing immune activity [13]. However, no previous studies have investigated the biological effects of fermented Rhodiola rosea and Lonicera japonica. To promote the processing of these two herbs, this study developed a process for fermenting Alcaligenes piechaudiiCC-ESB2 [14], wherein the functionality of the herbs is preserved and enhanced. Therefore, natural products have the potential to be further developed into novel functional foods, cosmetic raw material, and effective phytomedicine.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

Tyrosinase, kojic acid, and L-DOPA were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Plant materials ofRhodiola rosea and Lonicera japonica were purchased from Jin Wan Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (Taichung, Taiwan). All the plant materials were cultivated in Guizhou, China. The plant materials were fresh harvested and lyophilized by Guizhou Sanxin group Co. Ltd. (Guizhou, China). The voucher specimens were further confirmed by the Approval and Certification Center of Association of Taiwan Tea, Taichung, Taiwan. The plant materials were ground into a powder before use.


### 2.2. Microorganism and Fermentation

Alcaligenes piechaudiiCC-ESB2 are diesel-degrading strains [14]. Enrichment of A. piechaudii CC-ESB2 was conducted using a modified Bushnell’s method [14, 15]. Briefly, 5 × 106 of colony forming unit (CFU) bacteria were cultured with 0.5% Rhodiola rosea or Lonicera japonica in flasks with sand, 0.2% oil, and 500 mL BH medium at 30°C and cultured with shaking at 160 rpm under aerobic conditions for five days. The BH medium formula (g/L) is composed of K2HPO4: 1, KH2PO4: 1, NH4NO3: 1, MgSO4·7H2O: 0.2, CaCl2·2H2O: 0.02, and FeCl3: 0.05. After fermentation, the supernatant of broth was filtered and extracted twice using an equal volume of ethyl acetate. Hexane was used to extract and remove the oil of the sample. For ethanol extracts, both herbal medicines were twice extracted using 50% ethanol (W : V = 1 : 3). The samples were concentrated in a vacuum concentration device (PANCHUM R-2000V) and then freeze-dried (Freeze Dryer-FD-series, PANCHUM). The freeze-dried powder was stored at −20°C before use. The samples were reconstituted with 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The final concentration of DMSO in the reaction mixtures is less than 1%. One percent of DMSO was used as a vehicle control in the following assays.


### 2.3. Tyrosinase Activity Assay

Tyrosinase activity was determined as previously reported [16] with the modification of using a microplate. Briefly, in a 96-well plate, 20 μL of 400 U of mushroom tyrosinase was mixed with 20 μL of 0.1–10 mg/mL of fermented and ethanol herbal extracts. After 160 μL of L-DOPA 0.5 mM was added to each solution, the solutions were monitored for the formation of dopachrome for 30 min by measuring the optical densities at 475 nm using an ELISA reader (TECAN, Austria) at room temperature. All experiments were conducted in triplicate. The tyrosinase inhibition rate was calculated as the inhibition rate (%) =1-(ASample475nm/AControl475nm)×100. The ED50 value was determined by regression of a constructing dose response curve at which 50% target activity was lost.


### 2.4. Total Phenolic Content

The total phenolic content was determined by Liao’s method [17]. A volume of 0.3 mL of samples at a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL was mixed with 2.4 mL of distilled water and 0.3 mL Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Sodium carbonate (20%, 0.6 mL) was added to the reaction mixture and allowed to stand for 30 min. The absorbance at 730 nm was measured and compared to a gallic acid calibration curve and expressed as mg of gallic acid per gram of sample (GAE).


### 2.5. DPPH Free Radical-Scavenging Assay

The scavenging activity of sample extracts on 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical was determined using a method previously described [17]. Fifty microliters of different concentrations (0.01, 0.02, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, and 1 mg/mL) of ethanol or fermented extracts were mixed with 150 μL of freshly prepared 0.1 mM DPPH in ethanol. DPPH absorbance was then measured at 517 nm, using an ELISA reader (TECAN, Austria). Each test was carried out in triplicate. Percent activity was calculated using the following equation:
(1)Activity(%)=1-(ASampleABlank)×100.


### 2.6. Superoxide Radical-Scavenging Assay

Superoxide anion-scavenging ability was measured using a previously described method [17]. The phenazine methosulfate-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (PMS-NADH) system generates superoxide radicals, which reduce nitroblue-tetrazolium (NBT) to a purple diformazan compound. Briefly, reaction solutions containing various concentrations of herbal samples (50 μL, 0.1 mg/mL to 2 mg/mL) mixed with PMS (80 μM), NADH (1248 μM), and NBT (200 μM) in phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.4) were incubated at room temperature for 5 min. The color was read at 560 nm against blank samples. 1% DMSO was used as a vehicle control. The superoxide anion radical-scavenging percentage was calculated using the following equation:
(2)Scavengingeffect(%)=1-(ASample560nmAControl560nm)×100.


### 2.7. Statistical Analysis

Three samples were prepared for each assay. The results were expressed as mean and standard deviation. Data analysis included one-way ANOVA, followed by duncan’s multiple range test (P<0.05) and a correlation test using the SigmaStat 3.5 software program.


## 2.1. Materials

Tyrosinase, kojic acid, and L-DOPA were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Plant materials ofRhodiola rosea and Lonicera japonica were purchased from Jin Wan Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (Taichung, Taiwan). All the plant materials were cultivated in Guizhou, China. The plant materials were fresh harvested and lyophilized by Guizhou Sanxin group Co. Ltd. (Guizhou, China). The voucher specimens were further confirmed by the Approval and Certification Center of Association of Taiwan Tea, Taichung, Taiwan. The plant materials were ground into a powder before use.


## 2.2. Microorganism and Fermentation

Alcaligenes piechaudiiCC-ESB2 are diesel-degrading strains [14]. Enrichment of A. piechaudii CC-ESB2 was conducted using a modified Bushnell’s method [14, 15]. Briefly, 5 × 106 of colony forming unit (CFU) bacteria were cultured with 0.5% Rhodiola rosea or Lonicera japonica in flasks with sand, 0.2% oil, and 500 mL BH medium at 30°C and cultured with shaking at 160 rpm under aerobic conditions for five days. The BH medium formula (g/L) is composed of K2HPO4: 1, KH2PO4: 1, NH4NO3: 1, MgSO4·7H2O: 0.2, CaCl2·2H2O: 0.02, and FeCl3: 0.05. After fermentation, the supernatant of broth was filtered and extracted twice using an equal volume of ethyl acetate. Hexane was used to extract and remove the oil of the sample. For ethanol extracts, both herbal medicines were twice extracted using 50% ethanol (W : V = 1 : 3). The samples were concentrated in a vacuum concentration device (PANCHUM R-2000V) and then freeze-dried (Freeze Dryer-FD-series, PANCHUM). The freeze-dried powder was stored at −20°C before use. The samples were reconstituted with 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The final concentration of DMSO in the reaction mixtures is less than 1%. One percent of DMSO was used as a vehicle control in the following assays.


## 2.3. Tyrosinase Activity Assay

Tyrosinase activity was determined as previously reported [16] with the modification of using a microplate. Briefly, in a 96-well plate, 20 μL of 400 U of mushroom tyrosinase was mixed with 20 μL of 0.1–10 mg/mL of fermented and ethanol herbal extracts. After 160 μL of L-DOPA 0.5 mM was added to each solution, the solutions were monitored for the formation of dopachrome for 30 min by measuring the optical densities at 475 nm using an ELISA reader (TECAN, Austria) at room temperature. All experiments were conducted in triplicate. The tyrosinase inhibition rate was calculated as the inhibition rate (%) =1-(ASample475nm/AControl475nm)×100. The ED50 value was determined by regression of a constructing dose response curve at which 50% target activity was lost.


## 2.4. Total Phenolic Content

The total phenolic content was determined by Liao’s method [17]. A volume of 0.3 mL of samples at a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL was mixed with 2.4 mL of distilled water and 0.3 mL Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Sodium carbonate (20%, 0.6 mL) was added to the reaction mixture and allowed to stand for 30 min. The absorbance at 730 nm was measured and compared to a gallic acid calibration curve and expressed as mg of gallic acid per gram of sample (GAE).


## 2.5. DPPH Free Radical-Scavenging Assay

The scavenging activity of sample extracts on 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical was determined using a method previously described [17]. Fifty microliters of different concentrations (0.01, 0.02, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, and 1 mg/mL) of ethanol or fermented extracts were mixed with 150 μL of freshly prepared 0.1 mM DPPH in ethanol. DPPH absorbance was then measured at 517 nm, using an ELISA reader (TECAN, Austria). Each test was carried out in triplicate. Percent activity was calculated using the following equation:
(1)Activity(%)=1-(ASampleABlank)×100.


## 2.6. Superoxide Radical-Scavenging Assay

Superoxide anion-scavenging ability was measured using a previously described method [17]. The phenazine methosulfate-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (PMS-NADH) system generates superoxide radicals, which reduce nitroblue-tetrazolium (NBT) to a purple diformazan compound. Briefly, reaction solutions containing various concentrations of herbal samples (50 μL, 0.1 mg/mL to 2 mg/mL) mixed with PMS (80 μM), NADH (1248 μM), and NBT (200 μM) in phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.4) were incubated at room temperature for 5 min. The color was read at 560 nm against blank samples. 1% DMSO was used as a vehicle control. The superoxide anion radical-scavenging percentage was calculated using the following equation:
(2)Scavengingeffect(%)=1-(ASample560nmAControl560nm)×100.


## 2.7. Statistical Analysis

Three samples were prepared for each assay. The results were expressed as mean and standard deviation. Data analysis included one-way ANOVA, followed by duncan’s multiple range test (P<0.05) and a correlation test using the SigmaStat 3.5 software program.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Tyrosinase Activity Assay

In this study, fermented extract ofRhodiola rosea exhibited potent inhibitory effect on tyrosinase activity in a dose response manner—the inhibitory effect was significantly greater than that of ethanol extract (Figure 1(a)).The ED50 of fermented Rhodiola rosea on the tyrosinase inhibitory effect is 0.78 mg/mL, which was about 12 times more potent than that of ethanol extracts (ED50 > 10 mg/mL) (Table 1).Table 1
Total phenolic content and IC50 values of antioxidative activities of fermented  and ethanol extracts of Rhodiola rosea and Lonicera japonica.
Rhodiola rosea
Lonicera japonica
Ethanol
Fermented
Ethanol
Fermented
Total phenolic content (mg GAE/g sample)
142.12 ± 10.27b#
241.58 ± 16.16
67.25 ± 9.91d
116.70 ± 3.96c
DPPH scavenging ED50 (mg/mL)
0.11 ±  0.00b
0.07 ± 0.00a
0.45 ± 0.01d
0.21 ± 0.01c
Superoxide scavenging ED50 (mg/mL)
1.15 ± 0.02d
0.37 ± 0.00b
0.66 ± 0.01c
0.28 ± 0.00a
#The samples with different letters in superscript in the same assay indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05).Tyrosinase inhibitory effects ofRhodiola roseaand Lonicera japonica. (a) Tyrosinase inhibitory effects of fermented and ethanol extracts of Rhodiola rosea. (b) Tyrosinase inhibitory effects of fermented and ethanol extracts of Lonicera japonica. Values are means ± SD (n=3). Asterisk indicates a significant difference (P<0.05) when compared to the data of fermented extracts with the value of respective ethanol extracts.
(a)
(b)Fermented extract ofLonicera japonica also exhibited a higher inhibitory effect on tyrosinase activity, compared to the ethanol extracts (Figure 1(b)).The ED50 of fermented Lonicera japonica on the tyrosinase inhibitory effect is 4.07 mg/mL, which increases about 70% insensitive to ethanol extracts of Lonicera japonica (ED50 = 6.93 mg/mL) (Figure 1(a)).However, fermented extract of Lonicera japonica was less effective than fermented extract of Rhodiola rosea on the tyrosinase inhibitory effect.In this study, ethanol extracts ofRhodiola rosea exhibited a high tyrosinase inhibition effect, which is consistent with the results of a previous report [18]. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that fermented extract of Rhodiola rosea has a more pronounced inhibitory effect on tyrosinase activity than does the effect of ethanol extract. Similar to gamma irradiation treatment [19], fermented treatment of Lonicera japonica exhibited higher tyrosinase inhibitory effects than did the effects of organic solvent extracts.


### 3.2. Total Phenolic Content

Among the four herbal extracts, fermented extract ofRhodiola rosea had the highest total phenolic content (241.58±16.16 mg GAE/g sample), followed by ethanol extract of Rhodiola rosea (142.12±10.27 mg GAE/g sample), fermented extract of Lonicera japonica (116.70±3.96 mg GAE/g sample), and ethanol extract of Lonicera japonica (67.25±9.91 mg GAE/g sample) (Table 1). This study also demonstrated that the total phenolic content of fermented extracts of Rhodiola rosea or Lonicera japonica was higher than the content of ethanol extracts of Rhodiola rosea or Lonicera japonica. The results were consistent with the previous reports that Bokbunja fermented by yeast had a higher total phenolic content than did the unfermented material [20].


### 3.3. DPPH Free Radical-Scavenging Assay

The DPPH radical-scavenging activity of four oils increased in a dose-dependent manner at sample concentrations between 0.01 and 1 mg/mL (Figure2(a)). The results indicate that the DPPH radical-scavenging activity of Rhodiola rosea and Lonicera japonica reached a saturation point at concentrations of 0.2 and 0.5 mg/mL, respectively (Figure 2(a)). The ED50 of DPPH radical-scavenging activity of the 4 oils was inversely proportional to the order of total phenolic content (Table 1). The current results indicate that DPPH radical-scavenging activity was inversely correlated with total phenolic content (r2=0.72).Antioxidative activities ofRhodiola roseaand Lonicera japonica. (a) DPPH radical scavenging effects of fermented and ethanol extracts of Rhodiola roseaand Lonicera japonica. (b) Superoxide scavenging effects of fermented and ethanol extracts of Rhodiola roseaand Lonicera japonica. Values are means ± SD (n=3).
(a)
(b)


### 3.4. Superoxide Radical-Scavenging Assay

Fermented extract ofRhodiola rosea exhibited potent superoxide radical-scavenging effect in a dose-dependent manner and possessed a significantly higher scavenging effect, as compared to the effect of ethanol extract (Figure 2(b)). The ED50 of fermented Rhodiola rosea is 0.37±0.00 mg/mL; however, the ED50 of ethanol extracts of Rhodiola rosea is 1.15±0.01 mg/mL. The ED50 of fermented and ethanol extracts of Lonicera japonica is 0.28±0.01 mg/mL and 0.66±0.00 mg/mL, respectively (Figure 2(b)). The order of superoxide radical-scavenging effect is fermented extract of Lonicera japonica  > fermented extract of Rhodiola rosea > ethanol extract of Lonicera japonica > ethanol extract of Rhodiola rosea.The results also demonstrate that 2 herbs fermented byAlcaligenes piechaudiiCC-ESB2 exhibit a considerably more potent effect on superoxide radical-scavenging than do the effects of ethanol extracts (Figure 2(b)). Surprisingly, in contrast to tyrosinase inhibitory and DPPH scavenging effects, the superoxide radical-scavenging effect of Lonicera japonica was more favorable than the effect of Rhodiola rosea (Figure 2(b)). The results may be due to Lonicera japonica [21] having more active components of superoxide radical-scavenging activity than does Rhodiola rosea [22]. It has been reported that Lonicera japonica extracts from flowers and leaves exerted potent superoxide radical-scavenging activities with ED50 values 16.60 and 38.63 μg/mL, respectively [23].


## 3.1. Tyrosinase Activity Assay

In this study, fermented extract ofRhodiola rosea exhibited potent inhibitory effect on tyrosinase activity in a dose response manner—the inhibitory effect was significantly greater than that of ethanol extract (Figure 1(a)).The ED50 of fermented Rhodiola rosea on the tyrosinase inhibitory effect is 0.78 mg/mL, which was about 12 times more potent than that of ethanol extracts (ED50 > 10 mg/mL) (Table 1).Table 1
Total phenolic content and IC50 values of antioxidative activities of fermented  and ethanol extracts of Rhodiola rosea and Lonicera japonica.
Rhodiola rosea
Lonicera japonica
Ethanol
Fermented
Ethanol
Fermented
Total phenolic content (mg GAE/g sample)
142.12 ± 10.27b#
241.58 ± 16.16
67.25 ± 9.91d
116.70 ± 3.96c
DPPH scavenging ED50 (mg/mL)
0.11 ±  0.00b
0.07 ± 0.00a
0.45 ± 0.01d
0.21 ± 0.01c
Superoxide scavenging ED50 (mg/mL)
1.15 ± 0.02d
0.37 ± 0.00b
0.66 ± 0.01c
0.28 ± 0.00a
#The samples with different letters in superscript in the same assay indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05).Tyrosinase inhibitory effects ofRhodiola roseaand Lonicera japonica. (a) Tyrosinase inhibitory effects of fermented and ethanol extracts of Rhodiola rosea. (b) Tyrosinase inhibitory effects of fermented and ethanol extracts of Lonicera japonica. Values are means ± SD (n=3). Asterisk indicates a significant difference (P<0.05) when compared to the data of fermented extracts with the value of respective ethanol extracts.
(a)
(b)Fermented extract ofLonicera japonica also exhibited a higher inhibitory effect on tyrosinase activity, compared to the ethanol extracts (Figure 1(b)).The ED50 of fermented Lonicera japonica on the tyrosinase inhibitory effect is 4.07 mg/mL, which increases about 70% insensitive to ethanol extracts of Lonicera japonica (ED50 = 6.93 mg/mL) (Figure 1(a)).However, fermented extract of Lonicera japonica was less effective than fermented extract of Rhodiola rosea on the tyrosinase inhibitory effect.In this study, ethanol extracts ofRhodiola rosea exhibited a high tyrosinase inhibition effect, which is consistent with the results of a previous report [18]. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that fermented extract of Rhodiola rosea has a more pronounced inhibitory effect on tyrosinase activity than does the effect of ethanol extract. Similar to gamma irradiation treatment [19], fermented treatment of Lonicera japonica exhibited higher tyrosinase inhibitory effects than did the effects of organic solvent extracts.


## 3.2. Total Phenolic Content

Among the four herbal extracts, fermented extract ofRhodiola rosea had the highest total phenolic content (241.58±16.16 mg GAE/g sample), followed by ethanol extract of Rhodiola rosea (142.12±10.27 mg GAE/g sample), fermented extract of Lonicera japonica (116.70±3.96 mg GAE/g sample), and ethanol extract of Lonicera japonica (67.25±9.91 mg GAE/g sample) (Table 1). This study also demonstrated that the total phenolic content of fermented extracts of Rhodiola rosea or Lonicera japonica was higher than the content of ethanol extracts of Rhodiola rosea or Lonicera japonica. The results were consistent with the previous reports that Bokbunja fermented by yeast had a higher total phenolic content than did the unfermented material [20].


## 3.3. DPPH Free Radical-Scavenging Assay

The DPPH radical-scavenging activity of four oils increased in a dose-dependent manner at sample concentrations between 0.01 and 1 mg/mL (Figure2(a)). The results indicate that the DPPH radical-scavenging activity of Rhodiola rosea and Lonicera japonica reached a saturation point at concentrations of 0.2 and 0.5 mg/mL, respectively (Figure 2(a)). The ED50 of DPPH radical-scavenging activity of the 4 oils was inversely proportional to the order of total phenolic content (Table 1). The current results indicate that DPPH radical-scavenging activity was inversely correlated with total phenolic content (r2=0.72).Antioxidative activities ofRhodiola roseaand Lonicera japonica. (a) DPPH radical scavenging effects of fermented and ethanol extracts of Rhodiola roseaand Lonicera japonica. (b) Superoxide scavenging effects of fermented and ethanol extracts of Rhodiola roseaand Lonicera japonica. Values are means ± SD (n=3).
(a)
(b)


## 3.4. Superoxide Radical-Scavenging Assay

Fermented extract ofRhodiola rosea exhibited potent superoxide radical-scavenging effect in a dose-dependent manner and possessed a significantly higher scavenging effect, as compared to the effect of ethanol extract (Figure 2(b)). The ED50 of fermented Rhodiola rosea is 0.37±0.00 mg/mL; however, the ED50 of ethanol extracts of Rhodiola rosea is 1.15±0.01 mg/mL. The ED50 of fermented and ethanol extracts of Lonicera japonica is 0.28±0.01 mg/mL and 0.66±0.00 mg/mL, respectively (Figure 2(b)). The order of superoxide radical-scavenging effect is fermented extract of Lonicera japonica  > fermented extract of Rhodiola rosea > ethanol extract of Lonicera japonica > ethanol extract of Rhodiola rosea.The results also demonstrate that 2 herbs fermented byAlcaligenes piechaudiiCC-ESB2 exhibit a considerably more potent effect on superoxide radical-scavenging than do the effects of ethanol extracts (Figure 2(b)). Surprisingly, in contrast to tyrosinase inhibitory and DPPH scavenging effects, the superoxide radical-scavenging effect of Lonicera japonica was more favorable than the effect of Rhodiola rosea (Figure 2(b)). The results may be due to Lonicera japonica [21] having more active components of superoxide radical-scavenging activity than does Rhodiola rosea [22]. It has been reported that Lonicera japonica extracts from flowers and leaves exerted potent superoxide radical-scavenging activities with ED50 values 16.60 and 38.63 μg/mL, respectively [23].


## 4. Conclusions

The investigated fermentedRhodiola rosea and Lonicera japonica have richer secondary metabolites such as phenolic contents compared to ethanol extracts of Rhodiola rosea and Lonicera japonica. Therefore, due to their high active components, fermentation can be considered as an effective biochemical process for application in food, drug, and cosmetics. Particularly, the expected potential of fermented Rhodiola rosea as a skin whitening and antiaging agent strengthens the possibility of its commercial use in food, drugs, and cosmetics. A previous report demonstrated that fermented Radix astragali exhibited more effects on hyaluronic acid (HA) production in primary human skin cells than did the effect of unfermented Radix astragali [11]. Investigation of the effects of fermented Rhodiola roseaand Lonicera japonica extracts on the collagen synthesis and hyaluronic acid production in primary human skin cells will be conducted in future study.



---

*Source: 612739-2013-11-06.xml*