# Effect of Surface Forces on Ultrathin Film Lubrication

Authors: Prakash Chandra Mishra
Journal: ISRN Tribology
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

Lubricated contact with nanoscale oil film is modeled for friction. Effect of the van der Waals pressure and the solvation pressure forces on such ultrathin lubricating oil film is considered while finding the friction and other parameters. Hydrodynamic action is represented using transient thermoelastohydrodynamics. Net pressure due to hydrodynamic, solvation, and van der Waals’ action is integrated over the contact area to find contact load. Conjunctional friction due to thermal activation of such ultrathin film is derived using the Eyring model. Effect of molecular dimension on friction is studied.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Ultrathin film transition is in between mixed and boundary regimes of lubrication. In mixed regime of lubrication, the contiguous surface geometry appears in film profile, while in boundary regime a total fluid film rupture occurs and the contiguous solids remain in contact. In between these two lubrication regimes, there exists a transition, where the film is in order of 0.5 nm–5 nm and is termed as ultrathin film. For such a case, the film is of about one or few molecular diameter thicknesses and subjected to solvation and van der Waals’ action. Very few attempts were made to know the mechanism of such an ultrathin film and its lubrication performance.First, Israelachvili [1] has studied the intermolecular surface forces. Henderson and Lozada-Cassou [2] developed a simplified theory to estimate the force between large spheres inside liquid, considering the effect of solvent. They simulated the alignment of the solvent dipoles in vicinity of the sphere and validated the resultant force with experimental finding. Evans and Parry [3] reviewed theoretical and computer simulated studies of atomic-order-fluid film absorbed. They focused on wet phase transition and found that the criticality in a continuously growing wetting film is due to capillary wave like fluctuation, which was best explained. Chan and Horn [4] studied the drainage of thin film between solid surfaces. They measured the transient film thickness, while it is squeezed between two mica surfaces of molecular order smoothness. In this study, film thickness of 0.5 nm is measured for OMTC (octamethyl-cyclotetrasiloxane), n-hexadecane, and n-tetradecane. For very thin film, the continuum Reynolds equation brakes as the drainage occurs in a series of abrupt steps, whose size matches the thickness of the molecular layer. Trace of water and its dramatic effect on drainage of nonpolar liquid between hydrophilic surfaces cause the film rupture, as they stated.Matsuoka and Kato [5] postulated ultrathin film lubrication theory to calculate the solvation pressure, for the case of EHL contact. The solvation pressure is calculated by solving the transformed Ornstein-Zernike equation for hard spheres in a two-phase system with Perram’s method and using the Derjaguin approximation. They applied this new concept to elastohydrodynamic problems, in which the film thickness is very small and force due to solvation and van der Waals’ action is significant. Roelands [6] developed a correlation with viscosity temperature and pressure. Mishra [7, 8] used this correlation to analyze the thermoelastohydrodynamics of a journal-bearing and a piston ring-cylinder liner contact, respectively.Earlier, Elrod [9] developed a cavitation algorithm that can address the film pressure both in the fluid film and in the cavitation region. It uses a switch function to identify the fluid film and the cavitation region. Swift and Stieber [10, 11] proposed a boundary condition, which works better than the Summerfield and Reynolds boundary condition. Mishra [12] used this boundary condition to study a misaligned elliptic bore journal bearing. Lifshitz [13] developed the theory of molecular attractive forces between solids. The limiting case of separation, as compared to wavelength of absorption band of solid, is studied in which the van der Waals force is becoming significant. In this analysis, the effect of temperature is also taken into consideration.Due to solid-solid contact, the adhesion and stick-slip affect the conjunctional performance [14]. Eyring [15] correlated viscosity, plasticity, and diffusion with an absolute reaction rate. Such a theory yields an equation for the absolute viscosity applicable to cases involving activation energies. The increasing viscosity with shearing stress is explained. Similarly, the same theory yields an equation for the diffusion coefficient, which, when combined with the viscosity and applied to the results of Orr and Butler for the diffusion of heavy into light water, gives a satisfactory and suggestive interpretation. The usual theories for diffusion coefficients and absolute electrical conductance should be replaced by those developed here when ion and solvent molecule are of about the same size. Briscoe and Evans [16] studied shear properties of the Langmuir and Blodgett layers of fluid film. Bowden and Tabor [17] were the first to emphasize the role of relatively moving solids in contact. The role of surface energy in contact of elastic solids is pointed out through the JKR (Johnson, Kendall, and Roberts) model [18]. It improved the earlier Archard’s model for elastic deformation and laws of friction.Based on the literature survey, it is realized that a model of thin film lubrication will be worth presenting with the inclusion of solvation and van der Waals’ action (Figure4).


## 2. Theory of the Model

When the contiguous surface approaches, just before asperity contact, the van der Waals and solvation pressure forces become active. The mechanism behind the thin film is the molecular level van der Waals force acting in direction opposite to and that of solvation pressure acting in direction of hydrodynamic pressure. The molecular structure of contiguous metal, as well as that of lubricant oil, is important in such circumstances.


### 2.1. Thin Film Geometry

For many types of conjunctions, the lubrication regime transition occurs. The reason is the approaching or the separation of contiguous solid surface due to nature or magnitude of entraining velocity. The external load that the film bears also plays a significant role. During approaching situation when the film thickness reduced from 0.7μm to 0.3 μm, the roughness of the contiguous solids needs to be addressed, while defining the film thickness for the Reynolds equation (Figure 1). The average flow Reynolds (Patir and Chang) equation is preferred for such a mixed regime.Transient nature of lubrication with reduced oil film thickness.
(a)
Roughness influenced the film geometry
(b)
Ultrathin film due to reduced gap to nanometer order
(c)
Film rupture in boundary regimeIt leads to the film rupture in the solid-solid contact causing asperity interaction and wear. In between two important transitions, there would be a phase of lubrication, when the film thickness of the lubricant would have the order of two to three molecular diameters. Figures2(a), 2(b), and 2(c) give the molecular structure of oils commonly used as lubricant. The diameter of the molecules of these oils varies from 1.0 nm, for the case of OMCTS, to 0.25 nm in the case of alkane hydrocarbon and these are nonpolar in nature. For some cases, these are also used as friction protective layer or sealant.Three-dimensional molecular structure of oils.
(a)
3D balls of OMCTS/silicone oil
(b)
Hexadecane/cetane
(c)
Tetradecane/alkane hydrocarbonSuch molecularly thin film has the tendency of dewetting due to solvation that reduces the localized friction near the asperity tip. Figure3 represents the relatively placed oils and the solid layer in contact where the solvation effect is dominating. Sometimes, due to dewetting, the metallic surface behaves as the smooth surface to minimize the severity of the asperity interaction.Molecular level ultrathin film contact with different oils.
(a)
Silicon oil lubricated steel surface
(b)
Cetane lubricated steel surface
(c)
Alkane hydrocarbon lubricated steel surfaceFigure 4
Ultrathin film zone and force balance.


### 2.2. Solvation

Solvation has a dominant effect. Such an ultrathin film, as discussed earlier, possesses the dewetting action of solvation that prevents the formation of meniscus and reduces the chance of adhesion. The solvation is more effective in the case of a lubricant with smaller size molecules (<2.0 nm). Lubricant with longer chain molecules has negligible effect of solvation. The solvation pressure (as given in (1)) is a function of the contact density parameter and the film ratio (h
/
d
m), with d
m being diameter of the lubricant molecule. The contact density is the bulk density of the fluid, which is the function of change in density (difference in the density of film in conjunction with that of film in a single free surface) and the Stephen Boltzmann’s constant and the temperature of oil, as given as follows:
(1)
P
s
=
-
C
e
-
h
/
d
m
cos
⁡
(
2
π
h
d
m
)
,
where
(2)
C
=
K
b
T
ρ
(
h
⟶
∞
)
,
ρ
(
h
⟶
∞
)
⟶
corresponding
value
for
single
surface
,
h
≥
d
m
.
T is temperature rise in oil due to friction.The film ratio is defined as the ratio of the film thickness to the molecular diameter of the lubricant oil. For any type of lubricant conjunction, the rise in temperature occurs due to the rapid shear of lubricant layer. The solvation effect dominates the gap, which is of several molecular diameters. It happens due to the density variation of liquid near the solid boundary. The dewetting action of solvation guards against formation of meniscus and prevents adhesion. The solvation is more pronounced for small fluid molecules such as perfluoropolyether and OMCTS/octamethyl-cyclotetrasiloxane, which are nominally spherical molecules (1–1.5 nm). Such an effect is negligible for long chain molecules. Table1 represents the molecular specification of different oils.Table 1
Molecular specification of several oils.
Lubricant type
Compound name
Chemical formula
“C” value in MPa
Molecular diameter (nm)
Density (gm/mL)
Molecular structure
A
OMCTS/silicon oil
[Si(CH3)2O]4
172 MPa
1.0 nm
0.956
B
Hexadecane/cetane
(C16H34)
62 MPa
0.4 nm
0.77
C
Tetradecane/alkane hydrocarbon
CH3(CH2)12CH3
49 MPa
0.25 nm
0.756


### 2.3. Van der Waals’ Pressure

The van der Waals force is a weak attractive force, which is mainly responsible for binding the organic molecule of the lubricant to asperity in the contiguous metal surface. It is given in the following equation:(3)
F
w
=
∑
P
w
d
A
,
where
(4)
P
w
=
-
A
h
6
π
h
3
,
A
h
⟶
the
Hamaker
constant
or
(5)
A
h
=
π
2
C
a
ρ
m
ρ
l
,
where
(6)
C
a
=
-
r
6
ω
(
r
)
,
A
h
lies
in
between
(
10
-
21
–
1
0
-
19
J
)
A
h
=
1.4
×
1
0
-
20
J
.In this caseρ
m and ρ
l are number of atoms per unit volume in the surfaces of metal and lubricant. C
a is the coefficient in particle pair interaction and is found in van der Waals’ interaction. The van der Waals force is effective only for few hundred angstroms.


### 2.4. The Casimir-Polder Pressure

In lubricated contact, there is the attraction force between to contiguous solids beyond the van der Waals limit up to few micrometers. Such pressure is given as(7)
F
c
A
=
P
cas
=
ℏ
c
l
π
2
240
h
4
,
where F
c is the Casimir force, P
cas is the pressure due to the Casimir force, h is reduced Planck’s constant, and c is the speed of light.


### 2.5. Conjunction Friction due to the Eyring Shear

Ultrathin film adsorbed in molecularly thin and smooth surface is subjected to shearing due to thermal activation (see (8)) based chemical reactions. It is non-Newtonian in nature. The potential barrier in thermal activation is given in the following equation. In this circumstance, the Eyring model can better describe contact conjunction fluid viscosity. Johnson [14] expressed the Eyring shear stress (see (9)) as function of velocity, pressure, and temperature. Consider the following:
(8)
E
y
=
Q
-
p
Ω
-
τ
ϕ
,
if
τ
ϕ
K
b
T
>
1
.
Potential barrier in thermal activation is given as
(9)
τ
=
τ
y
+
ξ
ρ
,
(
∵
ξ
=
Ω
ϕ
)
.
The Eyring shear stress is determined as
(10)
τ
y
=
1
ϕ
[
K
b
T
ln
⁡
(
U
v
f
)
+
Q
]
,
where v
f is characteristic velocity related to frequency process. Therefore,
(11)
τ
y
=
K
b
T
ϕ
ln
⁡
U
+
τ
y
r
-
ρ
P
v
,
(12)
τ
y
r
=
1
ϕ
[
Q
-
P
v
Ω
+
K
b
T
ln
⁡
v
f
]
.In (12), the following substitution is made as follows:
(13)
K
b
T
ϕ
≃
3.4
A
,
τ
y
r
≃
11.3
A
,
ξ
=
0.16
F
=
∬
τ
y
d
x
d
y
,
τ
y
>
0
.


### 2.6. The Reynolds Equation

The Reynolds equation is a second-order differential equation which correlates the hydrodynamic pressure with film, entraining velocity, and lubricant viscosity and density. The Reynolds equation in this case is given as(14)
∂
∂
x
(
ρ
h
3
η
∂
P
h
∂
x
)
+
∂
∂
y
(
ρ
h
3
η
∂
P
h
∂
y
)
=
12
{
U
∂
P
h
∂
x
+
V
∂
P
h
∂
y
+
∂
∂
t
(
ρ
h
)
}
.
It is for the full fluid film region. The hydrodynamic pressure for both fluid film and cavitation region is given as
(15)
P
h
=
g
β
ln
⁡
θ
+
P
c
,
where
(16)
g
=
{
1
⟶
for
full
film
,
if
θ
≥
1
0
⟶
for
cavitation
region
,
if
θ
≥
0
.
θ is the fractional film content and g is the switch function. The Reynolds equation with cavitation inclusion turned to
(17)
∂
∂
x
(
ρ
c
h
3
η
g
β
∂
θ
∂
x
)
+
∂
∂
y
(
ρ
c
h
3
η
g
β
∂
θ
∂
y
)
=
12
{
U
∂
θ
ρ
c
h
∂
x
+
V
∂
θ
ρ
c
h
∂
y
+
∂
∂
t
(
θ
ρ
c
h
)
}
.
The Couette flow in the cavitation region leads to
(18)
(
U
∂
∂
x
+
V
∂
∂
y
+
∂
∂
t
)
(
θ
ρ
c
h
)
=
0
.
The Dowson and Higginson equation for density variation is
(19)
ρ
=
ρ
0
(
1
+
0.6
×
1
0
-
9
×
P
h
1
+
1.7
×
1
0
-
9
×
P
h
)
.
The viscosity variation is based on combined law as follows:
(20)
η
=
η
0
e
α
P
h
,
where
(21)
α
=
(
ln
⁡
η
0
+
9.67
)
[
{
1
+
P
h
/
1.98
×
1
0
8
}
z
-
1
]
P
h
,
Z
=
α
0
{
5.1
×
1
0
-
9
(
ln
⁡
η
0
+
9.67
)
}
.
Total conjunctional pressure at any instant of time is given as
(22)
P
T
=
P
h
+
P
w
+
P
s
,
where P
T is the total lubrication pressure, P
w is the van der Waals pressure, and P
s is pressure due to solvation. Therefore the load bearing ability is
(23)
W
=
∫
P
T
d
A
.


### 2.7. Solution Steps

The van der Waals force and the solvation pressure force are active for film of nanometer thickness. In this analysis, we have taken the film of 2.0–3.0 nm (which is equivalent to three layers of oil molecule). For a film profile of this order, the solvation pressure and the van der Waals pressure are calculated as per (1) and (3). Corresponding hydrodynamic pressure is calculated by solving the Reynolds equation. Load convergence and film relaxation are not required as the estimation is based on exact film. Further, the Eyring stress and corresponding friction are calculated as per (11). When there is further squeezing action, the film fails and the contact situation changes drastically. There occurs the asperity contact and boundary friction for which the wear of contiguous solid occurs.


## 2.1. Thin Film Geometry

For many types of conjunctions, the lubrication regime transition occurs. The reason is the approaching or the separation of contiguous solid surface due to nature or magnitude of entraining velocity. The external load that the film bears also plays a significant role. During approaching situation when the film thickness reduced from 0.7μm to 0.3 μm, the roughness of the contiguous solids needs to be addressed, while defining the film thickness for the Reynolds equation (Figure 1). The average flow Reynolds (Patir and Chang) equation is preferred for such a mixed regime.Transient nature of lubrication with reduced oil film thickness.
(a)
Roughness influenced the film geometry
(b)
Ultrathin film due to reduced gap to nanometer order
(c)
Film rupture in boundary regimeIt leads to the film rupture in the solid-solid contact causing asperity interaction and wear. In between two important transitions, there would be a phase of lubrication, when the film thickness of the lubricant would have the order of two to three molecular diameters. Figures2(a), 2(b), and 2(c) give the molecular structure of oils commonly used as lubricant. The diameter of the molecules of these oils varies from 1.0 nm, for the case of OMCTS, to 0.25 nm in the case of alkane hydrocarbon and these are nonpolar in nature. For some cases, these are also used as friction protective layer or sealant.Three-dimensional molecular structure of oils.
(a)
3D balls of OMCTS/silicone oil
(b)
Hexadecane/cetane
(c)
Tetradecane/alkane hydrocarbonSuch molecularly thin film has the tendency of dewetting due to solvation that reduces the localized friction near the asperity tip. Figure3 represents the relatively placed oils and the solid layer in contact where the solvation effect is dominating. Sometimes, due to dewetting, the metallic surface behaves as the smooth surface to minimize the severity of the asperity interaction.Molecular level ultrathin film contact with different oils.
(a)
Silicon oil lubricated steel surface
(b)
Cetane lubricated steel surface
(c)
Alkane hydrocarbon lubricated steel surfaceFigure 4
Ultrathin film zone and force balance.


## 2.2. Solvation

Solvation has a dominant effect. Such an ultrathin film, as discussed earlier, possesses the dewetting action of solvation that prevents the formation of meniscus and reduces the chance of adhesion. The solvation is more effective in the case of a lubricant with smaller size molecules (<2.0 nm). Lubricant with longer chain molecules has negligible effect of solvation. The solvation pressure (as given in (1)) is a function of the contact density parameter and the film ratio (h
/
d
m), with d
m being diameter of the lubricant molecule. The contact density is the bulk density of the fluid, which is the function of change in density (difference in the density of film in conjunction with that of film in a single free surface) and the Stephen Boltzmann’s constant and the temperature of oil, as given as follows:
(1)
P
s
=
-
C
e
-
h
/
d
m
cos
⁡
(
2
π
h
d
m
)
,
where
(2)
C
=
K
b
T
ρ
(
h
⟶
∞
)
,
ρ
(
h
⟶
∞
)
⟶
corresponding
value
for
single
surface
,
h
≥
d
m
.
T is temperature rise in oil due to friction.The film ratio is defined as the ratio of the film thickness to the molecular diameter of the lubricant oil. For any type of lubricant conjunction, the rise in temperature occurs due to the rapid shear of lubricant layer. The solvation effect dominates the gap, which is of several molecular diameters. It happens due to the density variation of liquid near the solid boundary. The dewetting action of solvation guards against formation of meniscus and prevents adhesion. The solvation is more pronounced for small fluid molecules such as perfluoropolyether and OMCTS/octamethyl-cyclotetrasiloxane, which are nominally spherical molecules (1–1.5 nm). Such an effect is negligible for long chain molecules. Table1 represents the molecular specification of different oils.Table 1
Molecular specification of several oils.
Lubricant type
Compound name
Chemical formula
“C” value in MPa
Molecular diameter (nm)
Density (gm/mL)
Molecular structure
A
OMCTS/silicon oil
[Si(CH3)2O]4
172 MPa
1.0 nm
0.956
B
Hexadecane/cetane
(C16H34)
62 MPa
0.4 nm
0.77
C
Tetradecane/alkane hydrocarbon
CH3(CH2)12CH3
49 MPa
0.25 nm
0.756


## 2.3. Van der Waals’ Pressure

The van der Waals force is a weak attractive force, which is mainly responsible for binding the organic molecule of the lubricant to asperity in the contiguous metal surface. It is given in the following equation:(3)
F
w
=
∑
P
w
d
A
,
where
(4)
P
w
=
-
A
h
6
π
h
3
,
A
h
⟶
the
Hamaker
constant
or
(5)
A
h
=
π
2
C
a
ρ
m
ρ
l
,
where
(6)
C
a
=
-
r
6
ω
(
r
)
,
A
h
lies
in
between
(
10
-
21
–
1
0
-
19
J
)
A
h
=
1.4
×
1
0
-
20
J
.In this caseρ
m and ρ
l are number of atoms per unit volume in the surfaces of metal and lubricant. C
a is the coefficient in particle pair interaction and is found in van der Waals’ interaction. The van der Waals force is effective only for few hundred angstroms.


## 2.4. The Casimir-Polder Pressure

In lubricated contact, there is the attraction force between to contiguous solids beyond the van der Waals limit up to few micrometers. Such pressure is given as(7)
F
c
A
=
P
cas
=
ℏ
c
l
π
2
240
h
4
,
where F
c is the Casimir force, P
cas is the pressure due to the Casimir force, h is reduced Planck’s constant, and c is the speed of light.


## 2.5. Conjunction Friction due to the Eyring Shear

Ultrathin film adsorbed in molecularly thin and smooth surface is subjected to shearing due to thermal activation (see (8)) based chemical reactions. It is non-Newtonian in nature. The potential barrier in thermal activation is given in the following equation. In this circumstance, the Eyring model can better describe contact conjunction fluid viscosity. Johnson [14] expressed the Eyring shear stress (see (9)) as function of velocity, pressure, and temperature. Consider the following:
(8)
E
y
=
Q
-
p
Ω
-
τ
ϕ
,
if
τ
ϕ
K
b
T
>
1
.
Potential barrier in thermal activation is given as
(9)
τ
=
τ
y
+
ξ
ρ
,
(
∵
ξ
=
Ω
ϕ
)
.
The Eyring shear stress is determined as
(10)
τ
y
=
1
ϕ
[
K
b
T
ln
⁡
(
U
v
f
)
+
Q
]
,
where v
f is characteristic velocity related to frequency process. Therefore,
(11)
τ
y
=
K
b
T
ϕ
ln
⁡
U
+
τ
y
r
-
ρ
P
v
,
(12)
τ
y
r
=
1
ϕ
[
Q
-
P
v
Ω
+
K
b
T
ln
⁡
v
f
]
.In (12), the following substitution is made as follows:
(13)
K
b
T
ϕ
≃
3.4
A
,
τ
y
r
≃
11.3
A
,
ξ
=
0.16
F
=
∬
τ
y
d
x
d
y
,
τ
y
>
0
.


## 2.6. The Reynolds Equation

The Reynolds equation is a second-order differential equation which correlates the hydrodynamic pressure with film, entraining velocity, and lubricant viscosity and density. The Reynolds equation in this case is given as(14)
∂
∂
x
(
ρ
h
3
η
∂
P
h
∂
x
)
+
∂
∂
y
(
ρ
h
3
η
∂
P
h
∂
y
)
=
12
{
U
∂
P
h
∂
x
+
V
∂
P
h
∂
y
+
∂
∂
t
(
ρ
h
)
}
.
It is for the full fluid film region. The hydrodynamic pressure for both fluid film and cavitation region is given as
(15)
P
h
=
g
β
ln
⁡
θ
+
P
c
,
where
(16)
g
=
{
1
⟶
for
full
film
,
if
θ
≥
1
0
⟶
for
cavitation
region
,
if
θ
≥
0
.
θ is the fractional film content and g is the switch function. The Reynolds equation with cavitation inclusion turned to
(17)
∂
∂
x
(
ρ
c
h
3
η
g
β
∂
θ
∂
x
)
+
∂
∂
y
(
ρ
c
h
3
η
g
β
∂
θ
∂
y
)
=
12
{
U
∂
θ
ρ
c
h
∂
x
+
V
∂
θ
ρ
c
h
∂
y
+
∂
∂
t
(
θ
ρ
c
h
)
}
.
The Couette flow in the cavitation region leads to
(18)
(
U
∂
∂
x
+
V
∂
∂
y
+
∂
∂
t
)
(
θ
ρ
c
h
)
=
0
.
The Dowson and Higginson equation for density variation is
(19)
ρ
=
ρ
0
(
1
+
0.6
×
1
0
-
9
×
P
h
1
+
1.7
×
1
0
-
9
×
P
h
)
.
The viscosity variation is based on combined law as follows:
(20)
η
=
η
0
e
α
P
h
,
where
(21)
α
=
(
ln
⁡
η
0
+
9.67
)
[
{
1
+
P
h
/
1.98
×
1
0
8
}
z
-
1
]
P
h
,
Z
=
α
0
{
5.1
×
1
0
-
9
(
ln
⁡
η
0
+
9.67
)
}
.
Total conjunctional pressure at any instant of time is given as
(22)
P
T
=
P
h
+
P
w
+
P
s
,
where P
T is the total lubrication pressure, P
w is the van der Waals pressure, and P
s is pressure due to solvation. Therefore the load bearing ability is
(23)
W
=
∫
P
T
d
A
.


## 2.7. Solution Steps

The van der Waals force and the solvation pressure force are active for film of nanometer thickness. In this analysis, we have taken the film of 2.0–3.0 nm (which is equivalent to three layers of oil molecule). For a film profile of this order, the solvation pressure and the van der Waals pressure are calculated as per (1) and (3). Corresponding hydrodynamic pressure is calculated by solving the Reynolds equation. Load convergence and film relaxation are not required as the estimation is based on exact film. Further, the Eyring stress and corresponding friction are calculated as per (11). When there is further squeezing action, the film fails and the contact situation changes drastically. There occurs the asperity contact and boundary friction for which the wear of contiguous solid occurs.


## 3. Result Analysis

Figure5(a) shows a parabolic film profile with 2.5 nm thickness. The corresponding solvation pressure and the van der Waals pressure are given in Figures 5(b) and 5(c), respectively. Such profile matches with the slider pairs like ring liner. Similarly, Figure 6(a) shows a profile, which is parabolic in entraining direction with a globally deformed profile along the side leakage direction. The corresponding solvation pressure and the van der Waals pressure are plotted (Figure 8).(a) Film profile-A. (b) Solvation pressure (due to film-A). (c) Van der Waals’ pressure (due to film-A).
(a)
(b)
(c)(a) Film profile-B. (b) Solvation pressure (due to film-B). (c) Van der Waals’ pressure (due to film-B).
(a)
(b)
(c)There is a change in the solvation and the van der Waals pressure profile due to film profile modification out of local and global deformations. Figure7 shows the 3D profile of solvation pressure due to ultrathin film of OMCTS, hexadecane, and tetradecane, respectively. It predicts that different oil molecule has different molecular structure thereby different solvation pressure profile.Solvation pressure due to nanoscale oil film of (a) OMCT, (b) hexadecane, and (c) tetradecane.
(a)
(b)
(c)Van der Waals’ pressure due to nanoscale oil film of (a) OMCT, (b) hexadecane, and (c) tetradecane.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure9 shows the van der Waals pressure profile for all the three types of oils (OMCTS, hexadecane, and tetradecane). The van der Waals pressure is independent of oil molecular arrangement. Figure 9 shows the friction due to the Eyring stress. The oil with smaller molecular diameter has less friction due to the Eyring condition. Again, the point contact causes more friction than semiconformal or conformal contact.Figure 9
Friction for different contact due to the Eyring condition.With increasing velocity, the Eyring stress increases (Figure10). It is more in the case of long chain molecules. Figure 11 shows the Casimir-Polder pressure.Figure 10
The maximum Eyring stress variation due to entraining velocity.Figure 11
Surface force beyond van der Waals’ boundary up to 25 nm.


## 4. Conclusion

Nanoscale film exists and performs prior to the film rupture in almost all types of lubricated contacts. Combined action of the solvation and the van der Waals action remains dominant and governs the lubrication performance in this case. The net pressure is the vector sum of these two pressures along with hydrodynamic pressure. Such consideration has more detail of molecular and nanoscale ultrathin film performance for both mechanical and biological contacts.



---

*Source: 612195-2014-05-27.xml*