# Triterpenoid Saponins from the Pericarps ofSapindus mukorossi

Authors: Amita Sharma; Satish Chandra Sati; Om Parkash Sati; Maneesha Dobhal Sati; Sudhir Kumar Kothiyal
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

A novel acetylated triterpene bisdesmoside saponin is elucidated as named Hederagenin 3-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl (3→1)-[2,4-O-diacetyl-α-L-arabinopyranosyl]-28-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(2→1) [3-O-acetyl-β-D-glucopyranosyl] ester (1) along with two known saponins, hederagenin 3-O-(α-L-arabinopyranoside-(1→3)-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)-α-L-arabinopyranoside (2) and hederagenin 3-O-[β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1→3)-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)-α-L-arabinopyranoside] (3), from the pericarps of Sapindus mukorossi. The structures of these saponins were characterized by means of chemical and spectral methods including advanced 2D NMR studies.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Sapindus mukorossi Gaertn. of family Sapindaceae is well known as soap nut tree, which distributed in tropical and subtropical regions of Asia. Fruits of Sapindus mukorossi are popular ingredient in Ayurvedic shampoos and cleansers. The plant is an important remedy for relieving cough, detoxification, emetic, contraceptive, treatment of excessive salivation, epilepsy, and chlorosis [1–3]. Previous studies on the plants of this genus led to isolation and identification of triterpenoids, saponins [4–7], fatty acids [8], and flavonoids [9], from the pericarp, stem, and fruit of the plant. The present paper illustrates the isolation and structure revelation of a novel acetylated triterpene bisdesmoside saponin compound 1 (Figure 1) with the help of modern spectroscopic methods.Figure 1
Mass fragmentation of compound1.


## 2. Result and Discussion

Compound1 was obtained as an amorphous powder (85 mg), m.p. 278–280°C, positive to the Libermann-Burchard and Molish reagents. The IR spectrum showed absorptions at 3398 (OH), 1692 (C=O of COOH), and esteric band at 1719 cm−1. The ESI-MS of 1 indicated the loss of masses of 43, 132, 146, and 162 due to loss of acetyl group, arabinose, rhamnose, and glucose from molecule, respectively (Figure 1). These sugars were identified as Co-TLC comparison of the layer of the acid hydrolysate of 1 with authentic sugar samples. The pseudomolecular ion peak at m/z 1201.3467 [M]+ indicated molecular formula C59H92O25. The next ion peak at m/z 1085 showed the removal of two acetyl group, 985, 839, 634, and 473, respectively. The other ion peaks at m/z 985 showed removal of arabinose, at m/z 839 removal of rhamnose, and at m/z 634 and 473 removal of two glucose group, respectively. The amputation of water molecule at m/z 455 indicated the presence of aglycone hederagenin, molecular weight 456 and molecular formula C30H48O3. The 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) spectra of protons of each of the six methyl group of aglycone appeared as singlets at δH 0.73, 0.77, 0.82, 1.70, 0.91, and 0.94 of 3H for each H-24, H-25, H-26, H-27, H29, and H-30, respectively. The H-12 proton appeared as a triplet at δ 5.5 (J=3.5 Hz) and H-3 as multiplet signal at 3.15. In 1H NMR spectrum the four anomeric proton signals appeared as δ4.43 (H-1′), 4.42 (H-1′′), 4.73 (H-1′′′), and 4.5 (H-1′′′′). The first three signals appeared as doublet while H-1′′′′ appeared as multiplet signal. The J values were calculated as J1′-2′=7.5, J1′′-2′′=7.6, J1′′′-2′′′=7.2, and J1′′′′-2′′′′ = multiplet, respectively. These coupling constants indicated the β-D pyranosyl configuration for glucose and α-L pyranosyl for arabinose and rhamnose, respectively. The methyl proton of rhamnose resonated as a doublet at δ1.25 (J=6.0). The study and the comparison of all the aforementioned data proved that aglycone of 1 was hederagenin (Table 1). The 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) of 1 showed that 30C out of 59 consisted of aglycone in the molecules. The DEPT pulse sequence showed the presence of ten methyl, thirteen methylene, twenty-five methine, and eleven quartenary carbon. The peaks identified as endocyclic double bond between C-12 and C-13 apeared at 123.03 (CH) and 145.21 (quaternary carbon), respectively [10]. A slight low frequency shift of C-28, δ175.05, and its IR absorption at 1740 cm−1 suggested that glycosidic linkages occurred. The attachment of polysaccharide chain at C-3 of aglycone was confirmed by 10 PPm high-frequency chemical shift at 81.07. Hence it was a 3, 28-bisdesmisidc compound [11, 12]. The signal for 6 methyl groups of aglycone appeared at δ15.73, 16.02, 17.63, 26.02, 36.00, and 26.10 for C-24, 25, 26, 27, 29, and 30, respectively. The remaining 29 carbon signals of 59 were assigned to four sugar moieties attached to the C-3 and C-28 carbons of aglycone. The two anomeric carbon signals of the sugars at C-3 carbons appeared at 102.05 (C-1′′′) and 107.05 (C-1′′′′). A 10 PPm low-frequency chemical shift δ94.60 (C-1′) and 104.5 (C-1′′) was observed for anomeric carbon of the two glucose moiety attached at the C-28 carbonyl carbon of aglycone as ester linkage. Most of the proton and carbons of each sugar unit were assigned on the basis of extensive NMR experiments such as COSY, TOCSY, HMBC, and HMQC spectra and compared to reported data [13, 14].Table 1
13C, 1H, and HMBC data of compound 1 in DMSO d6.
PositionAglyconeHMBCGlyconeHMBCδC ppmδHppmPositionδCppmδHppm(1)38.051.36Glc (Inner)(2)26.10—1′94.64.45 (d, 7.5)C-28(3)81.202.732′74.023.21 (dd, 7.2, 8.8)(4)42.92—3′79.053.84 (t, 8.8)C-1′′(5)15.55—4′74.063.32 (m)(6)26.13—5′64.353.86 (d, 10.4)(7)33.15—3.68 (dd, 10.4, 4.8)(8)41.02—Glc (Terminal)(9)47.05—1′′104.544.42 (d, 7.6)(10)42.53—2′′73.093.26 (dd, 7.6, 8.4)(11)27.82—3′′79.953.15 (t, 8.4)(12)123.65.24C-134′′69.533.23 (t, 8.4)(13)145.02—5′′69.633.34 (m)(14)45.48—6′′68.033.83 (d, 11.6)(15)26.13—3.60 (dd, 11.6, 5.6)(16)22.34—CH3CO170.022.02 (d, 7.6)H-3′′(17)46.23—23.05(18)41.63—Rha(19)45.52—1′′′102.054.73 (d, 7.2)C-3(20)30.34—2′′′72.073.80 (dd, 3.2, 1.2)(21)33.91—3′′′81.083.63 (dd, 9.6, 3.2)C-1′′(22)35.31—4′′′73.003.36 (t, 9.6)(23)64.24—5′′′70.073.66 (dd, 9.6, 6.0)(24)12.830.82CH317.521.25 (d, 6.0)(25)16.770.73C-9,1Ara(26)17.351.701′′′′107.054.53 (m)(27)25.720.912′′′′71.053.69 (br, s)(28)178.83—3′′′′72.003.68 (m)(29)32.920.94C-194′′′′68.943.75 (m)(30)24.540.97C-215′′′′63.955.17 (d, 1.2)CH3CO170.05—H-3′′′′21.322.12 sCH3CO170.08—21.522.17 sH-4′′′′Three proton signals atδ2.02, 2.15, and 2.17 together with carbon signals at δ23.05, 21.32, 21.52, 170.02, 170.05, and 170.08 indicated the presence of three acetoxyl groups. The HMBC spectrum further confirmed three acetyl group from correlation among δH 3.6 (Ara-2), δC170.05; δH 3.7 (Ara-4), δC 170.08; and δH 3.1 (Term Glc-3), δC 170.02 respectively. The HMBC and HMQC experiments confirm the position of double bond and sugars. The correlations were observed between δH4.73 (H-1′′′ of Rha)/δc-81.20 (C-3 of aglycone), δH 4.53 (H-1′′′′ of Ara)/δc 72.0 (C-2′ of Rha), δH 4.4 (H-1′ of Glc)/δc 178.8 (C-28 of aglycone), and δ4.4 (H-1′′ of Glc terminal)/74.0 (C-2′ of Glc). Due to long correlation between δH 3.6 (Ara-2′′′′) and δc-172.05 (acetyl C=O); δH3.7 (Ara-4′′′′) and δc 170.08; and δH3.1 (Glc-3′′) and δc-170.02, the location of two acetate group was at C-2′′′′ and C-4′′′′ of arabinose and one at C-3′′ of glucose terminal [15–17]. Based on all of the previous accumulated data, the structure of compound 1 has been determined as hederagenin 3-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl (3→1)-[2,4-O-diacetyl-α-L-arabinopyranosyl]-28-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(2→1) [3-O-acetyl-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl] ester.


## 3. Material and Methods

### 3.1. General Experimental Procedure

Melting point was recorded on the Perfit melting point apparatus. IR spectra were recorded on Perkin-Elmer, spectrum RX I FT-IR spectrometer (KBr discs). NMR spectra were obtained on on Bruker, 400, Ultra shield NMR spectrometer (400 MHz for1H and 125 MHz for 13C, DMSO-d6 as solvent, TMS as internal standard). MS was recorded on LCMS Q-TOF micromass spectrometer and LCMS-LCQ, Finnigam, MAT mass spectrometer. Column chromatography was performed on silica gel (Merck 60–120 mesh, 15×100 cm). Thin-layer chromatography was carried out on silica gel (Merck 10–40 μm) and precoated plates were visualised by spraying with 7% H2SO4 as a universal spray reagent.


### 3.2. Plant Material

Fresh pericarps (6 kg) ofS. mukorossi were collected from Durgadhar, District Rudrapryag (Uttarakhand) during March 2009 and identified by Taxonomical Laboratory, Department of Botany, H.N.B. Garhwal University Srinagar. A voucher specimen (GUH-8644) of the plant was deposited in Departmental Herbarium for future records.


### 3.3. Extraction and Isolation

Shade dried and powdered pericarps ofS. mukorossi (4 kg) were extracted three times with 95% ethanol (5L) at 35°C (15 hours) on a heating mantle. The extraction mixture was filtered off and concentrated under reduced pressure to yield black brown residue (380 g). This residue was fractionated with EtOAc (repeatedly 3-4 times) that yielded EtOAc soluble and insoluble fractions. EtOAc soluble layer (190 g) after evaporation of solvent under reduced pressure afforded (110 g) of crude extract. This crude extract (preadsorbed with silica gel) was column chromatographed using silica gel (Merck 60–120 mesh, 500 g) using solvent gradient system in order to increase polarity, for example, ethyl acetate : methanol (95: 5→70 : 30). The fractions obtained were collected every 50 mL. The EtOAc : MeOH (88 : 12) eluent afforded compound 1. The elution with EtOAc :  MeOH (85 : 15) afforded compound 2 and (82 : 18) afforded compound 3.


### 3.4. Acid Hydrolysis

Compound1(3 mg) in 10% HCl-dioxane (1 : 1, 1 mL) was refluxed at 80°C for 4 h in a water bath, neutralized with aqueous Ag2CO3, filtered, and then extracted with CHCl3 (1 mL ×3). Aqueous layer (monosaccharide portion) was examined by TLC with n-BuOH–AcOH–H2O (4 : 1 : 5, upper layer) and compared with authentic samples of D-glucose, L –arabinose, and L-rhamnose.Hederagenin 3-O-[β-D-Xylopyranosyl-(1→3)]-[α-L-Rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)]-α-L-Arabinopyranoside (2). White amorphous powder (75 mg), IR υmax (KBr) 3397, 2939, 1694 cm−1. FABMS m/z: 989 [M + Na]+, molecular formula C58H78O18 (identical with the literature [18]).Hederagenin 3-O-[β-D-arabinopyranoside-(1→3)]-[α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)]-α-L-arabinopyranoside (3). White amorphous powder (80 mg), IR υmax (KBr) 3423, 2867, 1692 cm−1 (identical with the literature [19]).


## 3.1. General Experimental Procedure

Melting point was recorded on the Perfit melting point apparatus. IR spectra were recorded on Perkin-Elmer, spectrum RX I FT-IR spectrometer (KBr discs). NMR spectra were obtained on on Bruker, 400, Ultra shield NMR spectrometer (400 MHz for1H and 125 MHz for 13C, DMSO-d6 as solvent, TMS as internal standard). MS was recorded on LCMS Q-TOF micromass spectrometer and LCMS-LCQ, Finnigam, MAT mass spectrometer. Column chromatography was performed on silica gel (Merck 60–120 mesh, 15×100 cm). Thin-layer chromatography was carried out on silica gel (Merck 10–40 μm) and precoated plates were visualised by spraying with 7% H2SO4 as a universal spray reagent.


## 3.2. Plant Material

Fresh pericarps (6 kg) ofS. mukorossi were collected from Durgadhar, District Rudrapryag (Uttarakhand) during March 2009 and identified by Taxonomical Laboratory, Department of Botany, H.N.B. Garhwal University Srinagar. A voucher specimen (GUH-8644) of the plant was deposited in Departmental Herbarium for future records.


## 3.3. Extraction and Isolation

Shade dried and powdered pericarps ofS. mukorossi (4 kg) were extracted three times with 95% ethanol (5L) at 35°C (15 hours) on a heating mantle. The extraction mixture was filtered off and concentrated under reduced pressure to yield black brown residue (380 g). This residue was fractionated with EtOAc (repeatedly 3-4 times) that yielded EtOAc soluble and insoluble fractions. EtOAc soluble layer (190 g) after evaporation of solvent under reduced pressure afforded (110 g) of crude extract. This crude extract (preadsorbed with silica gel) was column chromatographed using silica gel (Merck 60–120 mesh, 500 g) using solvent gradient system in order to increase polarity, for example, ethyl acetate : methanol (95: 5→70 : 30). The fractions obtained were collected every 50 mL. The EtOAc : MeOH (88 : 12) eluent afforded compound 1. The elution with EtOAc :  MeOH (85 : 15) afforded compound 2 and (82 : 18) afforded compound 3.


## 3.4. Acid Hydrolysis

Compound1(3 mg) in 10% HCl-dioxane (1 : 1, 1 mL) was refluxed at 80°C for 4 h in a water bath, neutralized with aqueous Ag2CO3, filtered, and then extracted with CHCl3 (1 mL ×3). Aqueous layer (monosaccharide portion) was examined by TLC with n-BuOH–AcOH–H2O (4 : 1 : 5, upper layer) and compared with authentic samples of D-glucose, L –arabinose, and L-rhamnose.Hederagenin 3-O-[β-D-Xylopyranosyl-(1→3)]-[α-L-Rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)]-α-L-Arabinopyranoside (2). White amorphous powder (75 mg), IR υmax (KBr) 3397, 2939, 1694 cm−1. FABMS m/z: 989 [M + Na]+, molecular formula C58H78O18 (identical with the literature [18]).Hederagenin 3-O-[β-D-arabinopyranoside-(1→3)]-[α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)]-α-L-arabinopyranoside (3). White amorphous powder (80 mg), IR υmax (KBr) 3423, 2867, 1692 cm−1 (identical with the literature [19]).



---

*Source: 613190-2012-05-30.xml*