# Evolution of Structural-Phase States in TiNi Surface Layers Synthesized by Electron Beam Treatment

Authors: L. L. Meisner; A. I. Lotkov; Yu. P. Mironov; A. A. Neyman
Journal: Journal of Nanotechnology
 (2010)

---

## Abstract

The paper presents the results of X-ray diffraction analysis of nonequilibrium structural and elastic stress states in TiNi surface layers irradiated by low-energy electron beams. It is found that a surface layer with a mixed (2D columnar and 3D equiaxial) submicrocrystalline structure is formed on the irradiated side of the TiNi specimens, and the volume fractions of the two structure types depend on the beam energy parameters and number of pulses. The B2 phase synthesized in the layer is characterized by lattice microstrain due to stresses of the first and second kinds (εI≈±1%, εII=0.25%), and the layer as such is an internal stress concentrator for underlying layers of the material. In the intermediate layer beneath the stress concentrator, relaxation of irradiation-induced internal stress takes place. It is shown that the main mechanism of the relaxation is partial B2→B19′ martensite transformation. The B19′ martensite phase in the intermediate layer decreases the microstrain in the conjugate B2 phase. The thickness of the layer in which the relaxation processes develop through the B2→B19′ martensite transformation is 10–15 μm.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Recently, there has been intensive development in surface modification of metals by a high current electron beams of moderate and low energy [1–8]. The treatment makes it possible to form surface layers with new physical properties while unaffecting the original features in the material bulk. Crystalline and amorphous states in the layers, as a rule, are metastable since the temperature, pressure, heating and cooling conditions under which they are formed are highly nonequilibrium [7–13]. Available experimental data show that it is these nonequilibrium states in surface layers that ensure new atypical properties attractive for practical applications [14–19]. It is apparent that the new properties are primarily due to the changes in structural-phase states of material and hence in properties of its surface layers on electron beam treatment. However, the information on the thus synthesized structural-phase states and their relation to the change in surface properties of materials is very scanty, and the mechanisms of their formation are poorly known.Electron beam treatment of material gives rise to strong internal stress fields localized in its near-surface volumes [7, 10, 20–23]. In the regions of stress field localization, the material undergoes a change in mechanical properties (an increase in hardness, brittleness, rigidity) [18, 24]; however, there is also evidence that the stress fields adversely affect the chemical properties of the treated material, for example, impair its corrosion resistance [17, 19, 25].TiNi-based alloys with shape memory effect display elastic properties similar to those of biological tissues and this permits their advantageous use in medicine. However, the highly toxic nickel present in large concentration in TiNi-based alloys and the risk of its release into a biological medium makes urgent the search for ways of depositing protective coatings on their surface to increase the corrosion resistance and hence biocompatibility of the alloys. Experiments show that a promising technique for attaining the goal is low-energy electron beam treatment [15, 17, 19]. It is found that this treatment results in nonequilibrium structural-phase states in near-surface regions [17, 19, 26] and the gradients of their structural parameters provide a considerable increase in the physicochemical and mechanical characteristics of the alloys.At the same time, it should be noted that despite the large body of research in these structural states, no unified concept has been developed so far to combine mechanisms of their formation and methods of parameter control (grain size, phase composition, atomic structure parameters). This is primarily due to uniqueness of the object under study, since even with one and the same material and processing technique the process parameters vary from one experiment to another requiring a separate examination in each particular case.The objective of the work is to study the mechanisms of the formation and evolution of nonequilibrium structural and elastic stress states in TiNi near-surface layers irradiated by low-energy electron beams.


## 2. Materials, Method of Surface Treatment, and Investigation Technique

The TiNi alloy to be examined was produced by electric arc melting of iodide titanium and HO nickel with sixfold remelting of the ingot. The initial components of the mixture—titanium and nickel—were taken in the ratio corresponding to the equiatomic one (50 at.% Ti + 50 at.% Ni). In the work, we controlled the chemical composition in surface layers by Auger layer-by-layer electron spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction analysis and X-ray spectrum analysis. It was found [18] that selective evaporation of nickel escaped detection and after remelting, the composition of the B2 phase in the alloy corresponded to 49.5 at.% Ti + 50.5 at.% Ni, that is, Ti49.5Ni50.5.After electroerosion cutting to dimensions of20×10×1 mm3, finishing heat treatment (annealing at T = 1073 K for 1 h with cooling in a furnace) and electropolishing, the TiNi alloy specimens (further—TiNi specimens) at room temperature were in the two-phase state: main phase with B2 structure (bcc lattice ordered as CsCl, start temperature of the B2→B19′ transformation MS≈283 K, B2 lattice parameter for the Ti49.5Ni50.5 composition a0B2≈0.30125±0.00005 nm) and small amount (<5% vol) of the intermetallic Ti2Ni phase.Pulsed electron beam treatment was realized at the Institute of High Current Electronics, SB RAS (Tomsk). The TiNi specimen surface was irradiated by a low-energy (up to 30 keV) high-current (up to 30 kA) electron beam in high vacuum (~10-6 Pa) with oilless pump-down in the surface melting regime. The pulse duration was 2.6÷3.4 μs. With a beam energy density E1=4 J/cm2 and E2=8 J/cm2, the specimens were irradiated by twelve and fifty pulses, respectively.The structural-phase states in the alloy after electron beam treatment are highly nonequilibrium and hence the entire complex of X-ray diffraction analysis, including the variation in the X-ray diffraction geometry, was repeated one year later. X-ray diffraction analysis of the structural-phase states in near-surface regions of the TiNi specimens was made on a DRON-7 diffractometer at room temperature immediately after the treatment and one year later. In the analysis, the symmetric and asymmetric (variable grazing angleα) Bragg diffraction geometry with Co-Kα and Cu-Kα wavelengths were used. In the asymmetric X-ray reflection scheme, a constant effective penetration depth h at all Bragg angles was attained by choosing the angle α according to the procedure described in [27] and the instrumental shift of diffraction peaks was minimized by accurate adjustment.In the asymmetric Bragg diffraction geometry, the angleα was decreased to α=0.1° (without rotating the specimen), that is, to an angle smaller than the so-called critical angles of total external reflection αc with the chosen X-ray wavelengths for titanium nickelide (for both types of radiation 0.3°<αTiNi<0.4°). Nevertheless, a clearly defined diffraction pattern of four to five B2 peaks with a halfwidth of ~1° was observed even at the so small glancing angle. Similar peaks are shown in Figure 1. Evidently, the diffraction pattern observed at angles smaller than the theoretical angle of total external reflection for the B2 phase owes to nonzero surface roughness of the test specimens. For reducing the instrumental broadening of X-ray profiles, we used narrow (0.05 mm) exist slits and limited the specimen width. This allowed estimation of the microstrain in a layer of thickness up to ~50 nm (on the assumption that the height of irregularities is smaller than or comparable with this value).Figure 1
Fragments of X-ray diffraction patterns for the TiNi specimens exposed to electron beam surface treatment withE1=4 J/cm2, Co-Kα radiation, asymmetric diffraction scheme: α=0.15°(1) and α=2°(2).The microstrainεI≡εψ (due to the stress of the first kind) of the B2 phase lattice in near-surface regions was determined by measuring the angular positions of peaks of the B2 structure in the irradiated and nonirradiated specimens and by calculating the lattice parameter of the B2 phase from each peak and then from the formula [28](1)εψ=aψ-a0a0,whereΨ=(Θhkl-α) and is the angle between the normal to the specimen surface and the normal to the reflection plane (hkl), Θhkl is the Bragg angle, α is the angle between the direction of the primary beam and the surface plane (glancing angle). The microstrain of the B2 phase lattice was divided into normal and tangential (to the surface plane) components using the extrapolation curves a(sin2Ψ) and the values of aψ determined from the curves (Ψ  =  0° corresponds to the lattice parameter of the B2 phase and hence to the lattice microstrain normal to the plane of the specimen surface, and Ψ=90° to that tangential to this plane). The measurement accuracy Δεψ=±0.0005.The size of coherent scattering regionsD was estimated using an approximation technique with separation of the contributions of the microstrain εII (due to the stress of the second kind) and crystallite size to diffraction line broadening. The measurement accuracy for the microstrain ΔεII=±0.0005, and for coherent scattering regions of 50÷10 nm, ΔD varies within ±12÷1 nm.The structure of the irradiated surface was examined in reflected electrons using an Scanning electron microscope LEO EVO 50 (Zeiss, Germany) and in backscattered electrons using an INCA Crystal and EBDS systems (Oxford Instruments).


## 3. Results and Discussion

The X-ray diffraction analysis performed immediately after electron beam irradiation [27] shows that on the irradiated side of the TiNi specimens, a surface (outer) layer with atomic structure parameters differing from those in the nonirradiated TiNi specimens is normally formed. This layer is characterized by a one-phase structural state in which the lattice parameter of the B2 phase is smaller than that before irradiation and by texture parameters different from those in the nonirradiated specimens; this is evidenced from intense superstructure (100)B2 and main (200)B2 peaks present on the X-ray diffraction patterns of the treated specimens and absent on those of the initial specimens.The X-ray diffraction analysis performed within a year after the irradiation and presented in the work show that with misorientation of the specimen by a certain angleΔθ relative to the position in the symmetric Bragg diffraction geometry (Figure 2(a)), the intensity of the (100)B2 and (200)B2 peaks decreases steeply and at Δθ≥2° they disappear (Figure 2(b), 2). Unlike the above peaks, B2 peaks with other indices (hkl) survive on the X-ray patterns and feature an asymmetric profile (Figure 3(a)) with noticeable smearing (Figure 3(b)) compared to the initial shape before irradiation.Misorientation of the specimen position by the angleΔθ relative to the position in the symmetric Bragg diffraction geometry (a), fragments of X-ray diffraction patterns for the TiNi specimens irradiated with E1=4 J/cm2 (b): Bragg diffraction geometry (1), Bragg diffraction geometry with misorientation of the specimen position (scheme a) by the angle Δθ=1.5° (2). Co-Kα radiation, entrance and exit horizontal slits of width 0.1 mm.
(a)(b)Position (a) and shape (b) of the (211) B2 peak in the TiNi specimen: before irradiation (1), after irradiation withE1=4 J/cm2, N=20 pulses (2) and with E2=8 J/cm2, N=50 pulses (3). The Bragg diffraction geometry, Co-Kα radiation, entrance and exit horizontal slits of width 0.1 mm.
(a)(b)Apparently, the foregoing effects are impossible to explain by the presence of the phase with a purely columnar structure in the layer formed after irradiation. According to the X-ray data, the phase state in the layer is characterized by the B2 structure with a lattice parameter smaller than that in the initial B2 structure; thus, it can be supposed that there are two microstructural modifications of the synthesized B2 phase. The first modification is a columnar structure consisting of single crystallites with coherent scattering regions of size>100 nm in a direction normal to the specimen surface, that is, their size is much larger than the linear dimensions of the base of an individual crystallite. Estimation of the sizes of coherent scattering regions from the (100)B2 and (200)B2 peaks for different misorientations of the specimens shows that they remain near-constant. Therefore, this type of structural modification can be identified as a 2D submicrocrystalline state (by analogy with the Gleiter classification of nanostructures [29]).The second microstructural modification of the B2 phase more closely corresponds to a 3D submicrocrystalline structure with coherent scattering regions of size60÷70 nm. The size of the regions calculated from B2 peaks with different indices (hkl)B2 is no greater and sometimes even 1.5 times smaller (~40 nm) than the above values. However, the layers contributed to the diffraction peaks with different indices (hkl) differ in thickness and it is impossible to take into complete account the layer thickness. Thus, the data on coherent scattering regions of small size (~40 nm) are qualitative suggesting that there is no coherent scattering region larger than 60÷70 nm in the layer under consideration.The surface morphology of the specimens subjected to different modes of electron beam irradiation was studied in secondary and backscattered electrons by scanning electron microscopy methods. The study reveals structures consisting of submicrocrystalline grains that fill in whole (Figures 4(c)–4(e)) or in part (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)) the specimen surface. It is seen in Figure 4(c) that the specimens irradiated by 50 pulses with the highest energy are cracked after irradiation. The surface cracks apparently develop along grain boundaries of the initial B2 phase, since they form a cellular structure with a cell size of 25÷30 μm coincident with the grain size in the structure before irradiation. However, inside the cells there is a finer submicrocrystalline grain structure with a grain size of 20÷200 nm, and the step shape of the cracks is indicative of cracking along the grain boundaries of the structure. Increasing the electron beam energy deposited to the surface layer causes an increase in tensile stress (parallel to the specimen plane) and thus fracture of the surface layer as the ultimate strength of the material is reached. However, as is shown in the work and consistent with the mechanisms proposed in [22], the residual tensile stress decreases to almost zero even at a depth of 2–5 μm. It is this fact that is responsible for cracks only at the specimen surface and their non-propagation deep into the material. Thus, examination by scanning electron microscopy supports the results of X-ray diffraction analysis and suggests that a submicrocrystalline layer with a 2D (2D substructure) or 3D (3D substructure) type of grain morphology can be formed in the surface layer of the TiNi specimens on electron beam treatment.SEM images of the TiNi specimen surface after electron beam irradiation: withE1=4 J/cm2, N=20 pulses in backscattered electrons (a), (b) and with E2=8 J/cm2, N=50 pulses in secondary electrons (c)–(e).
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)Estimation of the elastic stress state in the layer of the synthesized B2 structure reveals high lattice microstrainεI≈±1% due to stress of the first kind and rather low microstrain εII=0.25% due to stress of the second kind. The stress of the first kind presumably arises in response to changes in the external conditions of electron beam treatment (propagation of the temperature front and elastic wave, cooling rate, duration; number of pulses, etc.) and levels off throughout the specimen bulk. The stress of the second kind results from dispersion of “blocks” (or coherent scattering regions) produced on irradiation and from microdistortions in the blocks.Evidently, the elastically stressed outer layer is a stress concentrator for underlying TiNi layers, that is, for intermediate layers between the synthesized outer layer and the unaffected material bulk, and is bound to influence the structural states of the B2 phase in these layers. Actually, X-ray diffraction analysis of the specimens exposed to low-energy electron beams shows that in the layers beneath the outer layer, the lattice parameter of the B2 phase varies with both the thickness of the analyzed layer and the mutual orientation of the primary beam and of the plane of the specimen surface, that is, with crystallographic direction.It is evident from the dependences of the parameteraB2 on the function sin2Ψ (Figure 5) for different glancing angles that after irradiation a linear increase in aB2 with an increase in sin2Ψ occurs in the TiNi specimens. The slope angles of the straight lines aB2(sin2Ψ) depend on the glancing angle α; however at any α, these lines have a positive slope such that aB2(Ψ=0)<(aB2)<aB2(Ψ=90°). Besides, the dependences aB2(sin2Ψ) in Figure 5 are indicative of the gradient of the lattice parameter in the synthesized B2 structure; the smallest values of the gradient are found near the irradiated surface. The most significant change in aB2 is revealed in a surface layer of thickness less than 2 μm to which there corresponds α=3°(straight line 2 in Figure 5). Obviously this behavior of aB2 is due to the elastic stress fields localized in near-surface layers exposed to electron beam treatment.Figure 5
Lattice parameteraB2 versus sin2ψ in the TiNi specimens after irradiation with 20 pulses at E1=4 J/cm2: α=1°(1), α=3°(2) and α=10°(3); a0 is the lattice parameter of the B2 phase in the initial specimen.The slope of the straight linesaB2(sin2Ψ) makes it possible to estimate the orientation dependence and the type (compressive/tensile) of the elastic stress state in the phase under study [20]. In the example, electron beam irradiation gives rise to compressive stress normal to the surface plane and tensile stress tangential to it in a surface layer of thickness up to 10÷15 μm (the Co-Kα penetration depth is ~1.3 and ~3.8 μm for α=3° and 10°, resp.). At the same time, the values of aB2 measured at an angle Ψ=45° are close to those in the initial specimen, that is, the average value of the lattice parameter of the B2 phase in the elastically stressed layer remains the same, and hence the concentration relation between the Ti and Ni components in this layer remains constant.Estimation of the microstrainεI≡εψ in the lattice of the B2 phase immediately after electron beam treatment shows that in an outer layer of thickness up to 1÷3 μm the microstrain takes on the highest values and decreases with increasing the penetration depth. The microstrain εΨ calculated from the X-ray diffraction patterns within a year after irradiation is suggestive of a relaxation process in a layer of thickness less than 1 μm, as evidenced also by a change in the character of the penetration depth dependence of microstress. Figure 6 shows the microstrain εΨ in relation to the penetration depth for mutually perpendicular directions corresponding to Ψ=0° and Ψ=90°. It is seen from the figure that immediately after irradiation, the tangential component of the microstrain εψ=90° is positive over the entire range of measurements (curve 1) and this gives an indication of tensile internal stress in this direction. The highest values of εψ=90° are attained in a layer of thickness less than 2 μm. Within a year after irradiation, this dependence remains the same (curve 2).Figure 6
Components of the microstrain in the B2 phase lattice in relation to the penetration depth in the TiNi specimens irradiated withE1=4 J/cm2: εΨ=90°=90 (1, 2) and εΨ=0 (3, 4). Curves 1 (○), 3 (◊)—immediately after irradiations, curves 2 (●), 4 (♦)—a year later.Unlike the tangential component, the normal component of the microstrainεψ=0 in the surface layer is negative (curve 3) and this points to compressive internal stress in this direction. Immediately after irradiation, the normal component of the microstrain reaches the highest (absolute) values in a layer of thickness less than 1 μm and one year later its absolute values in the modified layer decrease and fluctuate about zero (curve 4). At a depth of 1 μm from the surface, the values of εψ=0 obtained immediately and within a year after irradiation are near coincident. This means that no elastic stress relaxation occurs at this depth. A small discrepancy in εψ=0 found for a thickness of 1÷4 μm one year later is likely to be due to the change in the microstrain of the B2 phase lattice in the recrystallized layer, which contributes to the X-ray diffraction patterns.As already noted the alloy under study experiencesB2↔B19′ martensite transformation whose temperatures are close to room temperature (Tr). First, this means that with the advent of internal elastic stress fields in the specimens, the stress-induced B2→B19′ transformation may result in the B19′ martensite phase; second, the B19′ phase may appear on X-ray patterns taken at room temperature rather than in temperature chambers.Actually in the range of angles2θ≈38÷44° (for Cu-Kα radiation), the X-ray diffraction patterns taken in the asymmetric Bragg geometry reveal rather clearly defined B19′ peaks whose intensity varies with the angle α. To the above range of angles there corresponds a penetration depth of 6 and 7 μm (for Co-Kα and Cu-Kα radiation, resp.) and this implies that the B19′ martensite phase is formed in the layer beneath the outer layer (with submicrocrystalline structures). Figure 7 shows the ratio of the total intensity of all B19′ peaks revealed on the X-ray diffraction pattern to the intensity of the (110)B2 peak characteristic of the volume fractions of the martensite and high-temperature phases (vB19′/vB2) throughout the layer contributing to the diffraction pattern. It follows from the dependence that the volume fraction of the martensite phase near the surface is minimum, varies in a surface volume with a maximum at a depth of 4–6 μm from the irradiated surface, and tends to decrease in deeper layers.Figure 7
Ratio of the total intensity of theB19′ peaks to the intensity of the (110)B2 peak (IB19/I(110)B2~vB19′/vB2) versus the penetration depth in the TiNi specimens immediately after electron beam treatment.Comparison of the dependences in Figures6 and 7 shows that there is a correlation in the change of the microstrain εΨ in the B2 phase lattice and the amount of the B19′ martensite phase with increasing the thickness of the analyzed layer. At a depth of 3–6 μm from the specimen surface, the both components of εΨ take on the smallest (absolute) values and vB19′/vB2 assumes the highest values. In other words, the strain in the B2 phase lattice becomes the least when partial B2→B19′ martensite transformation occurs in the layer presumably due to partial stress relaxation in the main B2 phase. According to the X-ray data, the thickness of the layer in which the relaxation processes involved in the B2→B19′ martensite transformation are observed is 10–15 μm. It should be noted that despite the considerable decrease in the intensity of all diffraction peaks in the asymmetric Bragg diffraction geometry, no B19′ peak is found on the corresponding diffraction patterns of the TiNi specimens after electron beam treatment. This means that no B19′ martensite stress arises in the outer layer with submicrocrystalline B2 structure.


## 4. Conclusion

The results of study show that low-energy high-current electron beam treatment of the TiNi specimens in the pulsed melting mode results in a mixed (2D columnar and 3D equiaxial) submicrocrystalline structure on the irradiated side of the specimens. The volume fraction of each structure type in the layer annealed form the melt depends on the beam energy parameters and on the number of pulses. Increasing the density of the electron beam energy and the number of pulses suppresses the directed (to the free surface) growth of grains and hence decreases (to the point of disappearance) the volume fraction of the 2D substructure.The submicrocrystalline layer is characterized by a one-phase atomic crystalline state with an ordered B2 structure formed in a molten surface layer of thickness 2–5μm on fast cooling. The formed B2 structure differs from the initial one by the much smaller lattice parameter (aB2≈2.9930±0.0005 Å and a0=3.0125±0.0005 Å, resp.). This is attributable to the absence of impurity atoms (oxygen, carbon, etc. [17]) in the recrystallized layer and, probably, of structural defects, which is the subject for a separate study.The B2 phase synthesized in the layer is in the elastic stress state and is characterized by lattice microstrain due to stresses of the first and second kind (εI≈±1%, εII=0.25%). The large microstrain component εI suggests that in the mixed structure, the layer with a 2D columnar structure is an internal stress concentrator for underlying layers of the material.It is found that in the intermediate layer beneath the outer submicrocrystalline layer, relaxation of the irradiation-induced internal stresses takes place. It is shown that the main mechanism of the relaxation is partialB2→B19′ martensite transformation. The B19′ martensite phase present in the intermediate layer leads to a decrease in lattice microstrain in the adjacent B2 phase, and the larger the volume fraction of the martensite phase in the layer, the more pronounced the effect. The thickness of the layer in which the relaxation processes develop through the B2→B19′ martensite transformation is 10–15 μm.



---

*Source: 605362-2010-03-24.xml*