# Preparation of Carbon-Supported Ternary Nanocatalysts Palladium-Vanadium-Cobalt for Alcohol Electrooxidation

Authors: Thanh Thien Co; Thi Thanh Thao Pham; Thi Kieu Chinh Pham; Thi Duyen Diep; Le Thanh Nguyen Huynh; Viet Hai Le
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

Carbon-supported nanocatalysts palladium-vanadium-cobalt (PdVCo) were synthesized via ethylene glycol (EG) reduction reaction and NaBH4-assisted reduction. The electrocatalytic performance for alcohol oxidation in alkaline solutions was investigated. The XRD and EDX results confirmed the incorporation of V and Co with Pd lattice to form the ternary nanocatalysts PdVCo in a single phase. The NaBH4-assisted EG reduction process exhibited highly dispersed nanoparticles with a uniform size, and the electrochemical surface area (ECSA) determined by cyclic voltammetry in 1 M KOH was also superior. In electrocatalysis performance, the cyclic voltammetry (CV) and chronoamperometry (CA) results presented an excellent electrocatalytic activity and stability of the PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4 sample in the alcohol electrooxidation as compared to other synthesized samples with the steady current of 52 mA/cm2 and 21.9 mA/cm2 in methanol and ethanol, respectively.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The blooming interest in using Direct Alcohol Fuel Cells (DAFCs) as portable and mobile power sources is rooted in their desirable features of relatively small environmental footprint, compact system design, and higher volumetric energy densities compared with existing technologies. [1, 2] DAFC relies on the oxidation of alcohol, such as methanol, ethanol, or glycerol, on a catalyst layer to form carbon dioxide (CO2). Water (H2O) is consumed at the anode and produced at the cathode. Hydrogen ions formed during the oxidation of alcohol are transported across the proton exchange membrane to the cathode, where they react with oxygen (O2) to produce water. Electrons are transported through an external circuit from the anode to the cathode, providing power to external devices.Pd-based electrocatalysts are known to achieve better alcohol electrocatalytic oxidation activity than Pt-based ones. [3–6] Moreover, the incorporation between one or multiple transition metals and Pd to design carbon-supported Pd-based bimetallic-alloy [7–14] and trimetallic-alloy [15–19] catalysts or surface modification of Pd-based catalyst, such as PdCu@C [12, 20, 21], PdCo@C [7, 22, 23], PdAg@C [10], and PdNi@C [8, 24], not only promotes the electrochemical activity and stability but also proposes an efficient way to reduce cost at the same time due to their adjusted d-band electronic structure and surface atom rearrangement. [19, 25, 26] Rostami and coworkers [27] reported the enhancement of ethanol electrooxidation of ternary PdCuNi catalyst when Ni was incorporated; the addition of Ni accelerated the removal of adsorbed carbonaceous intermediate species during ethanol oxidation. Huang and colleagues [28] prepared a core-shell ternary PdCuBi/C catalyst that exhibited an excellent performance toward ethylene glycol oxidation.Ethylene glycol reduction is common process for the preparation of metal nanoparticles, but this process needs to be assisted by high temperature or microwave irradiation to improve the reduced performance. [6, 15, 28] However, NaBH4 is considered as a force reducing agent which can reduce metallic ions at room temperature, and the disadvantage of NaBH4 process is the formation of irregular particle size. [29–33] As a consequence, the combination process of ethylene glycol (EG) and NaBH4 can get better reduction to prepare the nanoparticles.In this work, we prepared the carbon-supported ternary nanocatalysts palladium-vanadium-cobalt (PdVCo) by ethylene glycol reduction process and, the NaBH4-assisted reduction was also considered. The nanocatalysts PdVCo showed a comparable alcohol electrocatalytic oxidation activity and stability as compared to the original Pd catalyst.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Materials

Analytical grade PdCl2 (ReagentPlus®, 99%, Sigma Aldrich), Co(NO3)2.6H2O (Sigma Aldrich, >99.9%), Vulcan XC-72R (Cabot, USA), polytetrafluoroethylene solution (PTFE, Sigma Aldrich, 65% in water), V2O5 (Merck, 99.5%), NaBH4 (Merck, 99.5%), and ethylene glycol (EG, Merck, 99.5%) were used without further purification. All the aqueous solutions were prepared with deionized water (DI water, 18.2 MΩ cm) in the whole experiment.


### 2.2. Carbon-Supported Nanocatalyst Preparation

Carbon Vulcan powder underwent two-step treatment to eliminate the metal traces. In the acid treatment, the carbon powder was soaked in 1 M HNO3 for 10 hours, coupled with ultrasonic irradiation for 15 minutes per hour; the powder was washed several times with DI water and dried at 70°C overnight. Next, the carbon powder was soaked in 1 M NaOH for 1 hour, washed with DI water, and dried at 70°C overnight. After that, the powder was heated at 200°C for 2 hours to obtain the pretreated carbon powder.0.8850 g PdCl2 was dissolved in 100 mL 0.01 M HCl, 0.91000 g V2O5 was dissolved in 100 mL 0.15 M NaOH, and 0.915 g Co(NO3)2.6H2O was dissolved in 100 mL DI water to obtain precursor solution 0.05 M H2PdCl4, 0.05 M Na3VO4, and 0.05 M Co(NO3)2, respectively. The reduction agents were EG and 0.01 M NaBH4.The carbon-supported nanocatalysts PdVCo at 20 wt% were prepared by the polyol reduction process. The precursor’s solutions H2PdCl4, Na2VO3, and Co(NO3)2 with the stoichiometry Pd : V : Co ratio of 1 : 1 : 1 were stirred in an ultrasonic condition; then, 100 mg pretreated Vulcan XC-72R carbon powder was added, and the mixture was ultrasonicated for 30 minutes. The reduction agents were dropped into the mixture, following four samples: (i) 15 mL EG, (ii) 20 mL EG, (iii) 15 mL EG + 20 mL NaBH4, and (iv) 20 mL EG + 20 mL NaBH4. The products were filtered, washed with DI water several times, and dried in an oven at 120°C for 2 hours. We then denoted the respective nanocatalyst samples: (i) PdVCo-15EG; (ii) PdVCo-20EG; (iii) PdVCo-15EG-20NaBH4; and (iv) PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4.The structure was characterized by X-ray diffraction by using a D8-Advance Diffractometer (Bruker) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å). The size and morphological features were analyzed by SEM with energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) detector using a Hitachi S-4800 instrument, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed using a JEOL JEM 1400 microscope at 120 kV. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller specific surface area (SBET) was determined by nitrogen adsorption measurement (Quantachrome Autosorb 1C) with an out-gas process at 200°C for 2 hours.


### 2.3. Electrochemical Measurements

All the electrochemical measurements were carried out at room temperature under nitrogen atmosphere on potentiostat/galvanostat PGSTAT320N (Metrohm, AG) apparatus with a three-electrode cell, including a glassy carbon electrode (GCE, 3 mm in diameter) as working electrode, a platinum wire as counter electrode, and a Ag/AgCl in 3.5 M KCl electrode as reference electrode. To prepare the working electrode, 2.5 mg nanocatalysts PdVCo were put into 1.0 mL ethanol and 25μl PTFE solution; the mixture was then ultrasonicated for 1 hour to obtain a homogeneous suspension. 75 μl of suspension was dropped on GCE and dried at 40°C in 1 hour. The electrocatalytic behavior of synthesized nanocatalysts was studied by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and chronoamperometry (CA). In order to determine the electrochemical surface areas (ECSAs) of the nanocatalysts, the CV measurements were carried out in a solution of 1 M KOH at a scan rate of 50 mV/s from −1 V to 0.5 V. For the alcohol oxidation electroactivity, the CV measurements in a solution of 1 M CH3OH + 1 M KOH and 1 M C2H5OH + 1 M KOH were conducted from −0.8 V to 0.3 V with a scan rate of 50 mV/s. CA measurements were performed in the same alcohol-contained KOH solution at an applied voltage of −0.130 V or −0.150 V for an hour.


## 2.1. Materials

Analytical grade PdCl2 (ReagentPlus®, 99%, Sigma Aldrich), Co(NO3)2.6H2O (Sigma Aldrich, >99.9%), Vulcan XC-72R (Cabot, USA), polytetrafluoroethylene solution (PTFE, Sigma Aldrich, 65% in water), V2O5 (Merck, 99.5%), NaBH4 (Merck, 99.5%), and ethylene glycol (EG, Merck, 99.5%) were used without further purification. All the aqueous solutions were prepared with deionized water (DI water, 18.2 MΩ cm) in the whole experiment.


## 2.2. Carbon-Supported Nanocatalyst Preparation

Carbon Vulcan powder underwent two-step treatment to eliminate the metal traces. In the acid treatment, the carbon powder was soaked in 1 M HNO3 for 10 hours, coupled with ultrasonic irradiation for 15 minutes per hour; the powder was washed several times with DI water and dried at 70°C overnight. Next, the carbon powder was soaked in 1 M NaOH for 1 hour, washed with DI water, and dried at 70°C overnight. After that, the powder was heated at 200°C for 2 hours to obtain the pretreated carbon powder.0.8850 g PdCl2 was dissolved in 100 mL 0.01 M HCl, 0.91000 g V2O5 was dissolved in 100 mL 0.15 M NaOH, and 0.915 g Co(NO3)2.6H2O was dissolved in 100 mL DI water to obtain precursor solution 0.05 M H2PdCl4, 0.05 M Na3VO4, and 0.05 M Co(NO3)2, respectively. The reduction agents were EG and 0.01 M NaBH4.The carbon-supported nanocatalysts PdVCo at 20 wt% were prepared by the polyol reduction process. The precursor’s solutions H2PdCl4, Na2VO3, and Co(NO3)2 with the stoichiometry Pd : V : Co ratio of 1 : 1 : 1 were stirred in an ultrasonic condition; then, 100 mg pretreated Vulcan XC-72R carbon powder was added, and the mixture was ultrasonicated for 30 minutes. The reduction agents were dropped into the mixture, following four samples: (i) 15 mL EG, (ii) 20 mL EG, (iii) 15 mL EG + 20 mL NaBH4, and (iv) 20 mL EG + 20 mL NaBH4. The products were filtered, washed with DI water several times, and dried in an oven at 120°C for 2 hours. We then denoted the respective nanocatalyst samples: (i) PdVCo-15EG; (ii) PdVCo-20EG; (iii) PdVCo-15EG-20NaBH4; and (iv) PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4.The structure was characterized by X-ray diffraction by using a D8-Advance Diffractometer (Bruker) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å). The size and morphological features were analyzed by SEM with energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) detector using a Hitachi S-4800 instrument, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed using a JEOL JEM 1400 microscope at 120 kV. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller specific surface area (SBET) was determined by nitrogen adsorption measurement (Quantachrome Autosorb 1C) with an out-gas process at 200°C for 2 hours.


## 2.3. Electrochemical Measurements

All the electrochemical measurements were carried out at room temperature under nitrogen atmosphere on potentiostat/galvanostat PGSTAT320N (Metrohm, AG) apparatus with a three-electrode cell, including a glassy carbon electrode (GCE, 3 mm in diameter) as working electrode, a platinum wire as counter electrode, and a Ag/AgCl in 3.5 M KCl electrode as reference electrode. To prepare the working electrode, 2.5 mg nanocatalysts PdVCo were put into 1.0 mL ethanol and 25μl PTFE solution; the mixture was then ultrasonicated for 1 hour to obtain a homogeneous suspension. 75 μl of suspension was dropped on GCE and dried at 40°C in 1 hour. The electrocatalytic behavior of synthesized nanocatalysts was studied by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and chronoamperometry (CA). In order to determine the electrochemical surface areas (ECSAs) of the nanocatalysts, the CV measurements were carried out in a solution of 1 M KOH at a scan rate of 50 mV/s from −1 V to 0.5 V. For the alcohol oxidation electroactivity, the CV measurements in a solution of 1 M CH3OH + 1 M KOH and 1 M C2H5OH + 1 M KOH were conducted from −0.8 V to 0.3 V with a scan rate of 50 mV/s. CA measurements were performed in the same alcohol-contained KOH solution at an applied voltage of −0.130 V or −0.150 V for an hour.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Physiochemical Characterization

Figure1 shows the typically XRD pattern of carbon-supported nanocatalysts PdVCo with the metal loading of 20 wt% (sample PdVCo-20EG-NaBH4). The characteristic peaks of face-center cubic crystalline Pd (JCPDS Card 00-005-0681) are observed with the planes (111), (200), and (220), suggesting the single-phase structure for all nanocatalysts. Compared to the original phase Pd (a = 3.8971 Å), the characteristic peaks of PdVCo-20EG-NaBH4 quietly shift toward higher 2θ, reflecting the incorporation of V and Co into the Pd lattice to form a ternary-alloy phase PdVCo. Moreover, the cubic lattice parameter of PdVCo-20EG-NaBH4 is slightly decreased to a = 3.8618 Å (detailed in Table S1) due to the smaller atom radius of Co and V. The broadening of the diffraction peaks is considered as the nanocrystalline characteristic of nanocatalysts PdVCo. The average crystallite size is calculated from the full width of the half maximum (FWHM) of highest intensity peak (111) through Debye–Scherrer equation (1) [13, 20]:(1)dhkl=kλβcosθ,where dhkl is the average crystallite size; k is the constant depending on the crystallite shape (0.9); λ is the wavelength of copper Kα X-ray radiation (1.5406 Å); β is the FWHM (in radian) of the most intense peak (in radian) and is determined by X’Pert HighScore Plus software; and θ is the diffraction angle. The average crystallite sizes of nanocatalysts PdVCo are gathered in Table S1. We observed that the crystallite sizes are around 5-6 nm. Although no Co and V peaks can be seen in XRD patterns, the EDX spectrum (Figure 2) of nanocatalysts indicates clearly the presence of the elements V and Co in ternary alloy; the mass ratios of Pd : V:Co are shown in Table 1. The Co-content and especially V-content in two NaBH4-assisted reduction samples are higher than those in the other samples; the atomic ratios of Pd : V : Co in PdVCo-15EG-NaBH4 and PdVCo-20EG-NaBH4 are 1 : 0.35 : 0.59 and 1 : 0.55 : 0.86, respectively. The results revealed the beneficial support of NaBH4 for trimetallic-alloy reduction.Figure 1
XRD patterns of nanocatalysts: (a) Pd-20EG-20NaBH4 and (b) PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4.Figure 2
EDX spectra of nanocatalysts: (a) PdVCo-15EG-20NaBH4 and (b) PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4.
(a)(b)Table 1
Ratio of Pd : V : Co in nanocatalysts.
SampleElementMass%Ratio Pd : V : CoPdVCo-15EGPd76.281 : 0.19 : 0.42V8.38Co15.37PdVCo-20EGPd70.081 : 0.23 : 0.61V9.15Co20.77PdVCo-15EG-20NaBH4Pd67.651 : 0.35 : 0.59V13.20Co19.15PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4Pd58.191 : 0.55 : 0.86V17.77Co24.06Figure3 shows the TEM images and particle size distribution of the nanocatalysts. The synthesized nanoparticles PdVCo have a small and uniform size and are well dispersed on the carbon surface with a narrow particle size distribution of 3 nm to 9 nm. In case of EG reduction agent, the nanoparticles are found with an average particle diameter of 6.8 nm, and the particle size larger 6 nm occupied more than 50%. Rather, in case of NaBH4-assisted reduction agents, the nanoparticles look smaller; the major particle size lies in range 5 nm to 7 nm. The NaBH4 assisted in the polyol reduction process that leads to little smaller and more uniformly sized nanoparticles. [29] Moreover, the incorporation of V and Co also supports a decrease of catalyst particle size and the modified-surface structure of Pd that leads to the surface-adsorbed species, and the electronic effect contributes to the alcohol electrooxidation on the Pd nanoparticles. [31, 34, 35].Figure 3
TEM images and particle size distribution nanocatalysts: (a) PdVCo-15EG; (b) PdVCo-20EG; (c) PdVCo-15EG-20NaBH4; and (d) PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4.
(a)(b)(c)(d)The BET surface area (SBET) of nanocatalysts was evaluated by N2 absorption and is detailed in Table 2. The increase of SBET, which was caused by the increase of EG, decreased the nanoparticle size. The smaller nanoparticle size can be favorable for the higher ECSA and catalytic activity for alcohol electrochemical reaction.Table 2
Specific area and particle size distribution of nano-PdVCo catalysts.
SampleSBET (m2/g)Particle size average (nm)% of particle size larger than 6 nmPdVCo-15EG69.66.7656.8PdVCo-20EG73.66.7254.1PdVCo-15EG-20NaBH473.46.1031.7PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH475.26.1433.2


### 3.2. Electrochemical Behaviors

In order to estimate the electrochemical surface area (ECSA), the CV measurement was performed in 1 M KOH at a scan rate of 50 mV/s (Figure4). Commonly, the CV curve of Pd-based nanocatalysts in KOH media presents three regions: (i) a potential region lower than −0.7 V assigned to the oxidation of the absorbed and the absorption of hydrogen from the catalyst surface; (ii) a potential region from −0.7 to −0.2 V corresponding to the formation of palladium hydroxides; and (iii) a potential region from −0.2 to 0.4 V relating to the palladium oxidation. For the reverse scan, the reduction of palladium oxide (Pd–O layers) to Pd0 appeared around −0.35 V. [10, 27, 33] The ECSA can be estimated by PdO reduction peak in CVs according to the following equation [27]:(2)ECSA=QS×10−4QC×m,where Qs is the total charge (mC) determined by integrating current peak of palladium oxide reduction, QC is the charge needed for the reduction of PdO monolayer, and m is the Pd loading in mg. The ECSA was also determined by the Coulombic charge corresponding to the oxide reduction peak at a negative potential of −0.36 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) in Figure 4. The calculated ECSAs are detailed in Table 3, The PdVCo-15EG-20NaBH4 (282 cm2/mg with QC = 0.581 mC/cm2) and PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4 (375 cm2/mg with QC = 0.741 mC/cm2) catalysts exhibit higher ECSAs than the EG-reduced catalyst.Figure 4
CVs of nanocatalysts PdVCo in 1 M KOH at a scan rate of 50 mV/s.Table 3
Electrochemical parameters from alcohol oxidation of nanocatalysts PdVCo.
SampleECSA (cm2/mg)CH3OHC2H5OHE (V)If (mA/cm2)Ib (mA/cm2)If/IbE (V)If (mA/cm2)Ib (mA/cm2)If/IbPdVCo-15EG128−0.13060.025.52.35−0.15323.432.50.72PdVCo-20EG137−0.12470.628.42.49−0.17733.649.30.67PdVCo-15EG-20NaBH4282−0.12581.829.02.82−0.16244.555.50.80PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4375−0.10086.729.02.98−0.10556.175.30.75The alcohol electrooxidation was performed by cyclic voltammetry on the nanocatalysts PdVCo in alkaline medium. The cyclic voltammograms are shown in Figures5 and 6. Although mechanisms of electrooxidation of methanol and ethanol are different, their cyclic voltammograms exhibit the same motif with two well-defined peaks in each curve. [2] In the forward scan, the oxidation peak can be assigned to the oxidation of freshly chemisorbed species coming from methanol or ethanol adsorption. The oxidation peak in the reverse scan associated with the removal of carbonaceous species (mostly in the form of linearly bonded Pd=C=O) is not completely oxidized in the forward scan compared to the oxidation of freshly chemisorbed species. [36–40] The magnitude of the peak current in the forward scan indicates the electrocatalytic activity of the electrocatalysts for alcohol oxidation. Furthermore, the ratio of the forward anodic peak current density (If) to the reverse anodic peak current density (Ib), If/Ib, is used to determine the catalyst’s tolerance to the intermediate carbonaceous species accumulated on the electrode surface. [41, 42] A higher ratio of If/Ib promotes a better electrocatalytic activity and resistance to CO poisoning on the electrode surface. The potential and current density of the alcohol oxidation peak in the forward scan and If/Ib ratio are detailed in Table 3.Figure 5
CVs of methanol electrooxidation on nanocatalysts PdVCo in a solution of 1 M KOH + 1 M CH3OH.Figure 6
CVs of ethanol electrooxidation on nanocatalysts PdVCo in a solution of 1 M KOH + 1 M C2H5OH.Figure5 displays the cyclic voltammetry on nanocatalysts PdVCo at a scan rate of 50 mV/s in the solution of 1 M CH3OH + 1 M KOH. We observed that the current density became higher with the increase of reduction agent. Particularly, the highest current density (86.7 mA/cm2) can be found in the mixture of reduction agent (sample PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4), which can be attributed to the fact that the NaBH4 assisted in the EG reduction process with highly dispersed nanoparticles with a uniform size (4-5 nm) and the highest electrochemical surface area. [29] Moreover, the If/Ib ratio varies among the PdVCo nanocatalysts. For EG reduction agent, the ratios are almost 2.5; for NaBH4-assisted reduction, they increased significantly. The ratios for PdVCo-15EG-20NaBH4 and PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4 are 2.82 and 2.98, respectively. On the other hand, the onset potential of PdVCo nanocatalysts looked more negative than those of sample Pd-20EG-20NaBH4 (Figure S3 and Table S2). The more negative onset potential can suggest the enhancement of Co tolerance and increase of electrocatalytic performance as well as stability. [31, 33, 43] In sum, the data from CV measurements indicated that the nanocatalyst PdVCo-20EG-NaBH4 exhibited superior catalytic activity for methanol oxidation.The CVs of the nanocatalysts in a solution of 1 M KOH + 1 M C2H5OH are shown in Figure 6. Two well-defined oxidation peaks can be observed in the five CV curves. The PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4 catalyst shows the best catalytic activity and poisoning tolerance among the five catalysts, as evidenced by its largest peak current and if/ib ratio. It is apparent that the size effect promotes the higher catalytic activity of nanocatalysts PdVCo for the alcohol electrooxidation.In order to evaluate the long-term activity of the alcohol oxidation reaction on nanocatalysts PdVCo, we performed the CA measurements for 3600 s at −0.130 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) in solution of 1 M KOH + 1 M CH3OH (shown in Figure 7) and at −0.150 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) in solution of 1 M KOH + 1 M C2H5OH (shown in Figure 8), respectively. In general, all CA curves present a gradual decline in current density that results from the poisoning of the electrocatalysts, such as the formation of oxides or hydroxides of Pd and other poisoning intermediates adsorbed on the electrocatalysts during alcohol electrooxidation. [44] It is clear that the current densities on the PdVCo-15EG-20NaBH4 and PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4 catalysts are higher than those of all CA measurements.Figure 7
CA curves of nanocatalysts PdVCo recorded at −0.130 V in a solution of 1 M KOH + 1 M CH3OH.Figure 8
CA curves of nanocatalysts PdVCo recorded at -0.150 V in a solution of 1 M KOH + 1 M C2H5OH.In methanol solution, the current densities remain about 49 and 52 mA/cm2 on PdVCo-15EG-20NaBH4 and PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4, respectively, compared with the other catalysts. Likewise, in an ethanol solution, the PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4 catalyst exhibits excellent stability. The steady current densities are 8.9 and 11.5 mA/cm2 on PdVCo-15EG and PdVCo-20EG catalysts, respectively, while the steady current on PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4 is about 21.9 mA/cm2. PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4 possesses the highest activity in the steady-state region for the oxidation of methanol or ethanol.


## 3.1. Physiochemical Characterization

Figure1 shows the typically XRD pattern of carbon-supported nanocatalysts PdVCo with the metal loading of 20 wt% (sample PdVCo-20EG-NaBH4). The characteristic peaks of face-center cubic crystalline Pd (JCPDS Card 00-005-0681) are observed with the planes (111), (200), and (220), suggesting the single-phase structure for all nanocatalysts. Compared to the original phase Pd (a = 3.8971 Å), the characteristic peaks of PdVCo-20EG-NaBH4 quietly shift toward higher 2θ, reflecting the incorporation of V and Co into the Pd lattice to form a ternary-alloy phase PdVCo. Moreover, the cubic lattice parameter of PdVCo-20EG-NaBH4 is slightly decreased to a = 3.8618 Å (detailed in Table S1) due to the smaller atom radius of Co and V. The broadening of the diffraction peaks is considered as the nanocrystalline characteristic of nanocatalysts PdVCo. The average crystallite size is calculated from the full width of the half maximum (FWHM) of highest intensity peak (111) through Debye–Scherrer equation (1) [13, 20]:(1)dhkl=kλβcosθ,where dhkl is the average crystallite size; k is the constant depending on the crystallite shape (0.9); λ is the wavelength of copper Kα X-ray radiation (1.5406 Å); β is the FWHM (in radian) of the most intense peak (in radian) and is determined by X’Pert HighScore Plus software; and θ is the diffraction angle. The average crystallite sizes of nanocatalysts PdVCo are gathered in Table S1. We observed that the crystallite sizes are around 5-6 nm. Although no Co and V peaks can be seen in XRD patterns, the EDX spectrum (Figure 2) of nanocatalysts indicates clearly the presence of the elements V and Co in ternary alloy; the mass ratios of Pd : V:Co are shown in Table 1. The Co-content and especially V-content in two NaBH4-assisted reduction samples are higher than those in the other samples; the atomic ratios of Pd : V : Co in PdVCo-15EG-NaBH4 and PdVCo-20EG-NaBH4 are 1 : 0.35 : 0.59 and 1 : 0.55 : 0.86, respectively. The results revealed the beneficial support of NaBH4 for trimetallic-alloy reduction.Figure 1
XRD patterns of nanocatalysts: (a) Pd-20EG-20NaBH4 and (b) PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4.Figure 2
EDX spectra of nanocatalysts: (a) PdVCo-15EG-20NaBH4 and (b) PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4.
(a)(b)Table 1
Ratio of Pd : V : Co in nanocatalysts.
SampleElementMass%Ratio Pd : V : CoPdVCo-15EGPd76.281 : 0.19 : 0.42V8.38Co15.37PdVCo-20EGPd70.081 : 0.23 : 0.61V9.15Co20.77PdVCo-15EG-20NaBH4Pd67.651 : 0.35 : 0.59V13.20Co19.15PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4Pd58.191 : 0.55 : 0.86V17.77Co24.06Figure3 shows the TEM images and particle size distribution of the nanocatalysts. The synthesized nanoparticles PdVCo have a small and uniform size and are well dispersed on the carbon surface with a narrow particle size distribution of 3 nm to 9 nm. In case of EG reduction agent, the nanoparticles are found with an average particle diameter of 6.8 nm, and the particle size larger 6 nm occupied more than 50%. Rather, in case of NaBH4-assisted reduction agents, the nanoparticles look smaller; the major particle size lies in range 5 nm to 7 nm. The NaBH4 assisted in the polyol reduction process that leads to little smaller and more uniformly sized nanoparticles. [29] Moreover, the incorporation of V and Co also supports a decrease of catalyst particle size and the modified-surface structure of Pd that leads to the surface-adsorbed species, and the electronic effect contributes to the alcohol electrooxidation on the Pd nanoparticles. [31, 34, 35].Figure 3
TEM images and particle size distribution nanocatalysts: (a) PdVCo-15EG; (b) PdVCo-20EG; (c) PdVCo-15EG-20NaBH4; and (d) PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4.
(a)(b)(c)(d)The BET surface area (SBET) of nanocatalysts was evaluated by N2 absorption and is detailed in Table 2. The increase of SBET, which was caused by the increase of EG, decreased the nanoparticle size. The smaller nanoparticle size can be favorable for the higher ECSA and catalytic activity for alcohol electrochemical reaction.Table 2
Specific area and particle size distribution of nano-PdVCo catalysts.
SampleSBET (m2/g)Particle size average (nm)% of particle size larger than 6 nmPdVCo-15EG69.66.7656.8PdVCo-20EG73.66.7254.1PdVCo-15EG-20NaBH473.46.1031.7PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH475.26.1433.2


## 3.2. Electrochemical Behaviors

In order to estimate the electrochemical surface area (ECSA), the CV measurement was performed in 1 M KOH at a scan rate of 50 mV/s (Figure4). Commonly, the CV curve of Pd-based nanocatalysts in KOH media presents three regions: (i) a potential region lower than −0.7 V assigned to the oxidation of the absorbed and the absorption of hydrogen from the catalyst surface; (ii) a potential region from −0.7 to −0.2 V corresponding to the formation of palladium hydroxides; and (iii) a potential region from −0.2 to 0.4 V relating to the palladium oxidation. For the reverse scan, the reduction of palladium oxide (Pd–O layers) to Pd0 appeared around −0.35 V. [10, 27, 33] The ECSA can be estimated by PdO reduction peak in CVs according to the following equation [27]:(2)ECSA=QS×10−4QC×m,where Qs is the total charge (mC) determined by integrating current peak of palladium oxide reduction, QC is the charge needed for the reduction of PdO monolayer, and m is the Pd loading in mg. The ECSA was also determined by the Coulombic charge corresponding to the oxide reduction peak at a negative potential of −0.36 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) in Figure 4. The calculated ECSAs are detailed in Table 3, The PdVCo-15EG-20NaBH4 (282 cm2/mg with QC = 0.581 mC/cm2) and PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4 (375 cm2/mg with QC = 0.741 mC/cm2) catalysts exhibit higher ECSAs than the EG-reduced catalyst.Figure 4
CVs of nanocatalysts PdVCo in 1 M KOH at a scan rate of 50 mV/s.Table 3
Electrochemical parameters from alcohol oxidation of nanocatalysts PdVCo.
SampleECSA (cm2/mg)CH3OHC2H5OHE (V)If (mA/cm2)Ib (mA/cm2)If/IbE (V)If (mA/cm2)Ib (mA/cm2)If/IbPdVCo-15EG128−0.13060.025.52.35−0.15323.432.50.72PdVCo-20EG137−0.12470.628.42.49−0.17733.649.30.67PdVCo-15EG-20NaBH4282−0.12581.829.02.82−0.16244.555.50.80PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4375−0.10086.729.02.98−0.10556.175.30.75The alcohol electrooxidation was performed by cyclic voltammetry on the nanocatalysts PdVCo in alkaline medium. The cyclic voltammograms are shown in Figures5 and 6. Although mechanisms of electrooxidation of methanol and ethanol are different, their cyclic voltammograms exhibit the same motif with two well-defined peaks in each curve. [2] In the forward scan, the oxidation peak can be assigned to the oxidation of freshly chemisorbed species coming from methanol or ethanol adsorption. The oxidation peak in the reverse scan associated with the removal of carbonaceous species (mostly in the form of linearly bonded Pd=C=O) is not completely oxidized in the forward scan compared to the oxidation of freshly chemisorbed species. [36–40] The magnitude of the peak current in the forward scan indicates the electrocatalytic activity of the electrocatalysts for alcohol oxidation. Furthermore, the ratio of the forward anodic peak current density (If) to the reverse anodic peak current density (Ib), If/Ib, is used to determine the catalyst’s tolerance to the intermediate carbonaceous species accumulated on the electrode surface. [41, 42] A higher ratio of If/Ib promotes a better electrocatalytic activity and resistance to CO poisoning on the electrode surface. The potential and current density of the alcohol oxidation peak in the forward scan and If/Ib ratio are detailed in Table 3.Figure 5
CVs of methanol electrooxidation on nanocatalysts PdVCo in a solution of 1 M KOH + 1 M CH3OH.Figure 6
CVs of ethanol electrooxidation on nanocatalysts PdVCo in a solution of 1 M KOH + 1 M C2H5OH.Figure5 displays the cyclic voltammetry on nanocatalysts PdVCo at a scan rate of 50 mV/s in the solution of 1 M CH3OH + 1 M KOH. We observed that the current density became higher with the increase of reduction agent. Particularly, the highest current density (86.7 mA/cm2) can be found in the mixture of reduction agent (sample PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4), which can be attributed to the fact that the NaBH4 assisted in the EG reduction process with highly dispersed nanoparticles with a uniform size (4-5 nm) and the highest electrochemical surface area. [29] Moreover, the If/Ib ratio varies among the PdVCo nanocatalysts. For EG reduction agent, the ratios are almost 2.5; for NaBH4-assisted reduction, they increased significantly. The ratios for PdVCo-15EG-20NaBH4 and PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4 are 2.82 and 2.98, respectively. On the other hand, the onset potential of PdVCo nanocatalysts looked more negative than those of sample Pd-20EG-20NaBH4 (Figure S3 and Table S2). The more negative onset potential can suggest the enhancement of Co tolerance and increase of electrocatalytic performance as well as stability. [31, 33, 43] In sum, the data from CV measurements indicated that the nanocatalyst PdVCo-20EG-NaBH4 exhibited superior catalytic activity for methanol oxidation.The CVs of the nanocatalysts in a solution of 1 M KOH + 1 M C2H5OH are shown in Figure 6. Two well-defined oxidation peaks can be observed in the five CV curves. The PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4 catalyst shows the best catalytic activity and poisoning tolerance among the five catalysts, as evidenced by its largest peak current and if/ib ratio. It is apparent that the size effect promotes the higher catalytic activity of nanocatalysts PdVCo for the alcohol electrooxidation.In order to evaluate the long-term activity of the alcohol oxidation reaction on nanocatalysts PdVCo, we performed the CA measurements for 3600 s at −0.130 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) in solution of 1 M KOH + 1 M CH3OH (shown in Figure 7) and at −0.150 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) in solution of 1 M KOH + 1 M C2H5OH (shown in Figure 8), respectively. In general, all CA curves present a gradual decline in current density that results from the poisoning of the electrocatalysts, such as the formation of oxides or hydroxides of Pd and other poisoning intermediates adsorbed on the electrocatalysts during alcohol electrooxidation. [44] It is clear that the current densities on the PdVCo-15EG-20NaBH4 and PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4 catalysts are higher than those of all CA measurements.Figure 7
CA curves of nanocatalysts PdVCo recorded at −0.130 V in a solution of 1 M KOH + 1 M CH3OH.Figure 8
CA curves of nanocatalysts PdVCo recorded at -0.150 V in a solution of 1 M KOH + 1 M C2H5OH.In methanol solution, the current densities remain about 49 and 52 mA/cm2 on PdVCo-15EG-20NaBH4 and PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4, respectively, compared with the other catalysts. Likewise, in an ethanol solution, the PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4 catalyst exhibits excellent stability. The steady current densities are 8.9 and 11.5 mA/cm2 on PdVCo-15EG and PdVCo-20EG catalysts, respectively, while the steady current on PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4 is about 21.9 mA/cm2. PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4 possesses the highest activity in the steady-state region for the oxidation of methanol or ethanol.


## 4. Conclusion

The ternary-alloy nanocatalysts PdVCo were successfully prepared by EG reduction, and the atoms V and Co were incorporated into Pd lattice to form a single phase. Moreover, the NaBH4 assisted not only in enhancing V-content and Co-content but also in slightly decreasing nanoparticle size, which led to a better electrocatalysis performance for alcohol oxidation. The PdVCo-20EG-20NaBH4 exhibited superior catalytic activity and stability as compared to the other synthesized samples with the steady current of 52 mA/cm2 in methanol and 21.9 mA/cm2 in ethanol.



---

*Source: 6027613-2020-08-26.xml*