# Comparison of Sodium Acid Sulfate and UV-C Treatment on Browning and Storage Quality of Fresh-Cut Potatoes

Authors: Yajing Xie; Qiong Lin; Wenqiang Guan; Shuzhen Cheng; Zhidong Wang; Chongde Sun
Journal: Journal of Food Quality
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

Fresh-cut vegetables, such as potato chips, get brown quickly and can easily be infected by bacterium during storage. Sodium acid sulfate (SAS) and UV-C treatments are regarded as effective methods for food preservation. In this study, the effects of SAS, UV-C treatment, and their combination on fresh-cut potatoes during storage were evaluated. Compared with the control, all of the treatments were effective in inhibiting the bacterial growth during the whole storage period. Also, both SAS and SAS + UV-C treatments significantly decreased browning and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity and increased the firmness and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents, while the UV-C treatment has no good effects on protecting such storage qualities in fresh-cut potatoes. However, when compared with SAS treatment, the combination of SAS and UV-C treatment did not promote the effect in protecting the storage abilities. Thus, it was concluded that SAS is a better treatment in extending shelf life and controlling the quality of fresh-cut potatoes during storage compared to UV-C treatment.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Fresh-cut vegetables, or minimally processed vegetables, are convenient for consumers while maintaining a high level of nutrients and a good taste [1]. However, these kinds of produces are easily suffering from browning, excessive microbe, and tissue softening due to the exposed surface. With an increasing share of the fresh-cut market during the last two decades, protecting the quality of produce has become particularly important [2, 3].Discoloration is a consequence of imbalance between phenol and quinone metabolism, which occurs from breakdown of tissue integrity. Numerous technologies have been applied to extend shelf life of fresh-cut produce, particularly the physical methods, such as heat-shock [4], gamma irradiation [5], vacuum packaging [6], modified atmosphere packaging [7], and UV-C [8]. Among them, UV-C is an effective and widely used method in the storage of much fresh-cut produce. Previous reports showed that UV-C can reduce the bacterial population, control browning [9], and inhibit the polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity [10]. In addition, it maintains nutrients, such as vitamin D2 [11], and can also lower the risk of disease [12]. Although UV-C has many advantages in protecting quality of fresh-cut produce, no significant effect on browning was observed according to previous reports [13].Many chemical substances are regarded as effective color-preserving reagents for fresh-cut vegetables, including ascorbic acid [14, 15], citric acid [16], ozone [17], calcium chloride [18, 19], and acidic electrolyzed water [20]. Sodium acid sulfate (SAS), which was certified as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) food additive by FDA in 1998, is effective in suppressing enzymatic browning and aerobic bacteria in fresh-cut apples [21], but the effects on potato chips are rarely investigated [22].In the present study, the effects of SAS, UV-C, and their combination on browning, microbial growth, PPO activity, and malondialdehyde (MDA) content of fresh-cut potatoes during storage at 4°C were evaluated. The aim of this study was to provide better alternative method for postharvest storage of fresh-cut produce.


## 2. Material and Methods

### 2.1. Sample Preparation and Treatments

Potatoes were purchased from a local supermarket and used for all experiments. Potatoes of uniform size were selected, peeled, and cut into 4-5 mm slices using a slicer. Two pretests were conducted at 4°C to select the suitable treatment time and concentration. In order to select the optimum SAS concentration, the potato slices were dipped into 0%, 1.0%, 1.5%, 2.0%, 2.5%, 3.0%, 4.0%, and 5.0% SAS solutions for 2 min, respectively. For the irradiation time of UV-C treatment, fresh-cut potatoes were irradiated for 2 min, 3 min, 4 min, and 5 min, respectively. After storage for a week, we found that UV-C irradiation for 3 min and 2.5% SAS treatment for 2 min were the most optimum selection.Prepared potatoes were divided randomly into four groups: (a) control: untreated samples; (b) SAS treatment: dipped in 2.5% SAS solutions for 2 min and then wiped with a clean paper; (c) UV-C treatment: exposed to UV-C irradiation for 3 min; (d) SAS + UV-C treatment: dipped in 2.5% SAS solutions for 2 min and then exposed to UV-C for 3 min. After treatment, the fresh-cut potatoes were packaged in polyethylene bags and stored at 4°C for 25 d. The potato slices were sampled at 0, 5, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25 d after treatment. Each treatment was repeated for three times and each replication has three slices of potatoes.


### 2.2. Texture Analysis

Firmness of fresh-cut potatoes was measured using TA-XT2i texture analyzer (Stable Micro Systems Ltd., UK). The samples were indented with a compression probe P50 (Stable Micro Systems Ltd., UK) and firmness was taken as the maximum force (N) required to puncture the slices for 70% of the thickness. Each slice was detected in two symmetrical points of the potato slices. Each treatment was repeated for six times.


### 2.3. Color Analysis

The color of the treated fresh-cut potatoes was measured using DigiEYE color Measurement and Imagine System (VeriVide Co. Ltd., Leicester, UK). Values ofL∗, a∗, and b∗ were used for analysis. The results were expressed as mean value from the whole potato slices. Each treatment was replicated for six times.


### 2.4. PPO Activity Analysis

The PPO enzyme was extracted according to the PPO test kit (Bioengineering Institute, China) protocol. The PPO activity was determined as the amount of enzyme that caused the absorbance decrease of 0.01 at 525 nm for 1 min.


### 2.5. Aerobic Plate Count (APC) Analysis

APCs were analyzed according to the method described in Chinese National Standards (GB 4789.2-2010) with modifications. All operations were conducted in sterile environment and all the reagents and instruments were sterilized (121°C, 20 min) prior to the analysis. Potato slices were cut into cubes. 10 g aliquots of sample were transferred into a sterile stomacher bag (Beijing Medical, China), which contained 90 mL of sterile saline water, and then pummelled at maximum speed for 2 min by Lab-Blender BILON-08 (Shanghai Bilang Co. Ltd., China). The bacterium solution was diluted using sterile saline water to at least three dilutions based on the count of last period. 0.1 mL of each diluent was plated on plate count agar (Beijing, AoBoXing 02–035A, China). The plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h and calculated as log CFU·kg−1.


### 2.6. MDA Content

The MDA content was measured according to the method described by Lin et al. [23]. 1 g of prepared sample was homogenized with 5 mL 10% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid and centrifuged for 10 min at 10,000g. 3 mL 0.6% thiobarbituric acid was added to the supernatant, and it was then held in a boiling water bath for 15 min. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm, 532 nm, and 600 nm. The content of MDA was calculated as follows: (1)MDAμmol·L-1=6.45×A532-A600-0.56×A450.


### 2.7. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were arranged in a completely randomized design and each treatment contained 3 replicates unless stated otherwise. Standard deviation and figures were drawn using Origin 8.6 (Microbial Software Inc., Northampton, MA, USA). The least significant difference (LSD) test at the 0.05 level was performed by SPSS Statistics 20 Software.


## 2.1. Sample Preparation and Treatments

Potatoes were purchased from a local supermarket and used for all experiments. Potatoes of uniform size were selected, peeled, and cut into 4-5 mm slices using a slicer. Two pretests were conducted at 4°C to select the suitable treatment time and concentration. In order to select the optimum SAS concentration, the potato slices were dipped into 0%, 1.0%, 1.5%, 2.0%, 2.5%, 3.0%, 4.0%, and 5.0% SAS solutions for 2 min, respectively. For the irradiation time of UV-C treatment, fresh-cut potatoes were irradiated for 2 min, 3 min, 4 min, and 5 min, respectively. After storage for a week, we found that UV-C irradiation for 3 min and 2.5% SAS treatment for 2 min were the most optimum selection.Prepared potatoes were divided randomly into four groups: (a) control: untreated samples; (b) SAS treatment: dipped in 2.5% SAS solutions for 2 min and then wiped with a clean paper; (c) UV-C treatment: exposed to UV-C irradiation for 3 min; (d) SAS + UV-C treatment: dipped in 2.5% SAS solutions for 2 min and then exposed to UV-C for 3 min. After treatment, the fresh-cut potatoes were packaged in polyethylene bags and stored at 4°C for 25 d. The potato slices were sampled at 0, 5, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25 d after treatment. Each treatment was repeated for three times and each replication has three slices of potatoes.


## 2.2. Texture Analysis

Firmness of fresh-cut potatoes was measured using TA-XT2i texture analyzer (Stable Micro Systems Ltd., UK). The samples were indented with a compression probe P50 (Stable Micro Systems Ltd., UK) and firmness was taken as the maximum force (N) required to puncture the slices for 70% of the thickness. Each slice was detected in two symmetrical points of the potato slices. Each treatment was repeated for six times.


## 2.3. Color Analysis

The color of the treated fresh-cut potatoes was measured using DigiEYE color Measurement and Imagine System (VeriVide Co. Ltd., Leicester, UK). Values ofL∗, a∗, and b∗ were used for analysis. The results were expressed as mean value from the whole potato slices. Each treatment was replicated for six times.


## 2.4. PPO Activity Analysis

The PPO enzyme was extracted according to the PPO test kit (Bioengineering Institute, China) protocol. The PPO activity was determined as the amount of enzyme that caused the absorbance decrease of 0.01 at 525 nm for 1 min.


## 2.5. Aerobic Plate Count (APC) Analysis

APCs were analyzed according to the method described in Chinese National Standards (GB 4789.2-2010) with modifications. All operations were conducted in sterile environment and all the reagents and instruments were sterilized (121°C, 20 min) prior to the analysis. Potato slices were cut into cubes. 10 g aliquots of sample were transferred into a sterile stomacher bag (Beijing Medical, China), which contained 90 mL of sterile saline water, and then pummelled at maximum speed for 2 min by Lab-Blender BILON-08 (Shanghai Bilang Co. Ltd., China). The bacterium solution was diluted using sterile saline water to at least three dilutions based on the count of last period. 0.1 mL of each diluent was plated on plate count agar (Beijing, AoBoXing 02–035A, China). The plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h and calculated as log CFU·kg−1.


## 2.6. MDA Content

The MDA content was measured according to the method described by Lin et al. [23]. 1 g of prepared sample was homogenized with 5 mL 10% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid and centrifuged for 10 min at 10,000g. 3 mL 0.6% thiobarbituric acid was added to the supernatant, and it was then held in a boiling water bath for 15 min. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm, 532 nm, and 600 nm. The content of MDA was calculated as follows: (1)MDAμmol·L-1=6.45×A532-A600-0.56×A450.


## 2.7. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were arranged in a completely randomized design and each treatment contained 3 replicates unless stated otherwise. Standard deviation and figures were drawn using Origin 8.6 (Microbial Software Inc., Northampton, MA, USA). The least significant difference (LSD) test at the 0.05 level was performed by SPSS Statistics 20 Software.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Firmness

The variation in firmness of samples was relatively stable during the whole storage period. SAS and SAS + UV-C-treated samples had significant (P<0.05) higher force values in firmness compared to control and UV-C-treated samples in most storage phases. No significant difference (P>0.05) was found in firmness between UV-C-treated samples and control during the whole storage period. At 5 d of storage, the firmness of potatoes in SAS + UV-C treatment increased by 74.9 N in comparison with that in SAS treatment. In general, the potatoes in SAS and SAS + UV-C treatments were firmer than that in control during the late storage period (Figure 1).Figure 1
Effects of SAS, UV-C, and SAS + UV-C on firmness of fresh-cut potatoes during storage. The error bars represent the standard deviation. LSDs represent least significant differences at the 0.05 level.


### 3.2. Color

Control and UV-C-treated potatoes showed an obviously darker appearance compared to SAS and SAS + UV-C-treated samples. The appearances of samples in SAS and SAS + UV-C treatments were similar during the whole storage period and were not affected by the length of the storage period. The UV-C-treated samples had no obvious difference with control, which appeared to lose its commodity attribute at 5 d storage (Figure2).Figure 2
Effects of SAS, UV-C, and SAS + UV-C on appearance of fresh-cut potatoes during storage.L
∗, a∗, and b∗ value of the fresh-cut potatoes are shown in Figure 3. Higher L∗ value represents lightness of the potato slices while decreasing a∗ indicates decline of redness, and increase in b∗ shows increasing yellowness of the potato slices.Figure 3
Effects of SAS, UV-C, and SAS + UV-C on color indexes of fresh-cut potatoes during storage. (a)L∗ value; (b) a∗ value; (c) b∗ value. The error bars represent the standard deviation. LSDs represent least significant differences at the 0.05 level.
(a)
(b)
(c)L
∗ values decreased continuously in the control and UV-C-treated potatoes. SAS and SAS + UV-C treatments maintained higher L∗ value compared with the control and UV-C-treated samples. However, no significant difference (P>0.05) was observed between SAS and SAS + UV-C. After storage for 25 days, the L∗ value was decreased to 67.9 in control but was still maintained at 80.7 and 80.6 in SAS and SAS + UV-C-treated samples, respectively (Figure 3(a)).The measurement ofa∗ presented an increasing trend among all treatments. SAS and SAS + UV-C treatments significantly (P<0.05) decreased a∗ value during the initial storage periods and the significant difference decreased as the storage period increased. At 10 d storage, a∗ value of potato slices in control was 15.7 and 6.70 times higher than that in SAS and SAS + UV-C treatment, respectively (Figure 3(b)).Theb∗ value presented a similar variation trend to L∗ value. Both SAS and SAS + UV-C treatments showed significantly (P<0.05) higher b∗ value throughout whole storage compared to other treatments (Figure 3(c)).


### 3.3. PPO Activity

PPO activity showed a high value in both the control and UV-C treatment during the storage period, but this phenomenon was significantly(P<0.05) suppressed by SAS and SAS + UV-C treatment. PPO activity had no significant difference (P>0.05) between UV-C treatment and the control during the early storage period, but it was significantly decreased (P<0.05) by UV-C treatment at 13, 16, and 19 d of storage compared to the control. In addition, the PPO activity was significantly (P<0.05) promoted by SAS + UV-C treatment at 10 and 13 d of storage compared to the SAS treatment (Figure 4).Figure 4
Effects of SAS, UV-C, and SAS + UV-C on PPO activity of fresh-cut potatoes during storage. The error bars represent the standard deviation. LSDs represent least significant differences at the 0.05 level.


### 3.4. Microbiological Analysis

The microbe count increased continuously in all the treatments during the whole storage period. SAS and SAS + UV-C treatments had significant effect on preventing bacterial growth during the whole periods while UV-C alone had significant result only in the later storage. SAS combined with UV-C treatment had the lowest bacterial populations among all treatments before storage of 13 d, but the difference was not significant when compared to SAS treatment. At 25 d, the APC in control samples was already too high to measure while it was maintained at 6.00 log CFU·g−1 approximately in the other three treatments (Figure 5).Figure 5
Effects of SAS, UV-C, and SAS + UV-C on APC of fresh-cut potatoes during storage. The error bars represent the standard deviation. LSDs represent least significant differences at the 0.05 level.


### 3.5. MDA Content

The content of MDA presented an increasing trend on the whole. UV-C treatment showed no significant difference in MDA content of potatoes compared with the control. But the MDA content was immediately induced and increased by SAS and SAS + UV-C treatment and maintained a high level during the whole storage period. However, the increase of MDA content in potato was significantly suppressed by the combination of SAS and UV-C treatment (Figure6).Figure 6
Effects of SAS, UV-C, and SAS + UV-C on MDA content of fresh-cut potatoes during storage. The error bars represent the standard deviation. LSDs represent least significant differences at the 0.05 level.


## 3.1. Firmness

The variation in firmness of samples was relatively stable during the whole storage period. SAS and SAS + UV-C-treated samples had significant (P<0.05) higher force values in firmness compared to control and UV-C-treated samples in most storage phases. No significant difference (P>0.05) was found in firmness between UV-C-treated samples and control during the whole storage period. At 5 d of storage, the firmness of potatoes in SAS + UV-C treatment increased by 74.9 N in comparison with that in SAS treatment. In general, the potatoes in SAS and SAS + UV-C treatments were firmer than that in control during the late storage period (Figure 1).Figure 1
Effects of SAS, UV-C, and SAS + UV-C on firmness of fresh-cut potatoes during storage. The error bars represent the standard deviation. LSDs represent least significant differences at the 0.05 level.


## 3.2. Color

Control and UV-C-treated potatoes showed an obviously darker appearance compared to SAS and SAS + UV-C-treated samples. The appearances of samples in SAS and SAS + UV-C treatments were similar during the whole storage period and were not affected by the length of the storage period. The UV-C-treated samples had no obvious difference with control, which appeared to lose its commodity attribute at 5 d storage (Figure2).Figure 2
Effects of SAS, UV-C, and SAS + UV-C on appearance of fresh-cut potatoes during storage.L
∗, a∗, and b∗ value of the fresh-cut potatoes are shown in Figure 3. Higher L∗ value represents lightness of the potato slices while decreasing a∗ indicates decline of redness, and increase in b∗ shows increasing yellowness of the potato slices.Figure 3
Effects of SAS, UV-C, and SAS + UV-C on color indexes of fresh-cut potatoes during storage. (a)L∗ value; (b) a∗ value; (c) b∗ value. The error bars represent the standard deviation. LSDs represent least significant differences at the 0.05 level.
(a)
(b)
(c)L
∗ values decreased continuously in the control and UV-C-treated potatoes. SAS and SAS + UV-C treatments maintained higher L∗ value compared with the control and UV-C-treated samples. However, no significant difference (P>0.05) was observed between SAS and SAS + UV-C. After storage for 25 days, the L∗ value was decreased to 67.9 in control but was still maintained at 80.7 and 80.6 in SAS and SAS + UV-C-treated samples, respectively (Figure 3(a)).The measurement ofa∗ presented an increasing trend among all treatments. SAS and SAS + UV-C treatments significantly (P<0.05) decreased a∗ value during the initial storage periods and the significant difference decreased as the storage period increased. At 10 d storage, a∗ value of potato slices in control was 15.7 and 6.70 times higher than that in SAS and SAS + UV-C treatment, respectively (Figure 3(b)).Theb∗ value presented a similar variation trend to L∗ value. Both SAS and SAS + UV-C treatments showed significantly (P<0.05) higher b∗ value throughout whole storage compared to other treatments (Figure 3(c)).


## 3.3. PPO Activity

PPO activity showed a high value in both the control and UV-C treatment during the storage period, but this phenomenon was significantly(P<0.05) suppressed by SAS and SAS + UV-C treatment. PPO activity had no significant difference (P>0.05) between UV-C treatment and the control during the early storage period, but it was significantly decreased (P<0.05) by UV-C treatment at 13, 16, and 19 d of storage compared to the control. In addition, the PPO activity was significantly (P<0.05) promoted by SAS + UV-C treatment at 10 and 13 d of storage compared to the SAS treatment (Figure 4).Figure 4
Effects of SAS, UV-C, and SAS + UV-C on PPO activity of fresh-cut potatoes during storage. The error bars represent the standard deviation. LSDs represent least significant differences at the 0.05 level.


## 3.4. Microbiological Analysis

The microbe count increased continuously in all the treatments during the whole storage period. SAS and SAS + UV-C treatments had significant effect on preventing bacterial growth during the whole periods while UV-C alone had significant result only in the later storage. SAS combined with UV-C treatment had the lowest bacterial populations among all treatments before storage of 13 d, but the difference was not significant when compared to SAS treatment. At 25 d, the APC in control samples was already too high to measure while it was maintained at 6.00 log CFU·g−1 approximately in the other three treatments (Figure 5).Figure 5
Effects of SAS, UV-C, and SAS + UV-C on APC of fresh-cut potatoes during storage. The error bars represent the standard deviation. LSDs represent least significant differences at the 0.05 level.


## 3.5. MDA Content

The content of MDA presented an increasing trend on the whole. UV-C treatment showed no significant difference in MDA content of potatoes compared with the control. But the MDA content was immediately induced and increased by SAS and SAS + UV-C treatment and maintained a high level during the whole storage period. However, the increase of MDA content in potato was significantly suppressed by the combination of SAS and UV-C treatment (Figure6).Figure 6
Effects of SAS, UV-C, and SAS + UV-C on MDA content of fresh-cut potatoes during storage. The error bars represent the standard deviation. LSDs represent least significant differences at the 0.05 level.


## 4. Discussion

Fresh-cut products satisfy consumers as they are freshly prepared, convenient, and beneficial for human health. However, fresh-cut produce deteriorates faster than corresponding intact produce, which leads to a reduction in quality and shelf life. The key points in fresh-cut produce deterioration are discoloration and excessive microorganism growth during storage and transportation [24].SAS has been reported to be an effective treatment for antibrowning of fresh-cut produce compared with other single or combined acidulants. Our results also suggested that 2.5% SAS significantly decreased the extent of browning in potato slices after 25 d storage, which confirmed the results of previous reports [21, 25, 26]. PPO, a key regulation factor in the process of browning, catalyzed the oxidation reaction with oxygen and phenolic compounds and promoted accumulation of quinones, which react with other substances continually leading to the polymerization of quinones [27, 28]. Previous studies produced the low browning potato by silencing the PPO genes, and they confirmed four PPO gene members were closely related to browning of potatoes [29, 30]. The maximum PPO activity in potato occurred at pH 6.8, while it was nearly inactive when pH was below 4.0 [31]. Previous research has demonstrated that SAS is a stronger acidulant (pKa = 2.0) when compared with ascorbic acid (pKa = 4.1) and citric acid (pKa = 3.1) [26]. There is a possibility that SAS treatment can decrease the pH level and PPO activity of the potato tissues, thus, leading to alleviated surface browning.Excessive microbial population in fresh-cut produce is another problem in fresh-cut industry [32, 33]. UV-C is an environmental-friendly strategy for extending the shelf life of fresh-cut produce and has proved to be effective in reducing bacterial count but not damage other quality attributes [34–36]. Our results showed that UV-C treatment was effective in sterilization of fresh-cut potatoes during storage, and, more interestingly, the SAS treatment had a better effect than UV-C treatment during the early storage period. It was speculated that hydrogen sulfate ion and lower pH might be the main reasons for antimicrobial action in SAS treatment [21], but the regulation mechanism needs further research.Combined treatments have been widely used in fresh produce during postharvest storage. For example, hot water combined with UV-C treatment has been applied to improve disease resistance and maintain quality of mangos [37]; aqueous chlorine dioxide combined with UV-C treatment was efficient in extending shelf life of blueberries [38]; UV-C combined with heat treatment was efficient in inactivation of the spoilage yeasts in apple juice [39]. According to our results, no significant antibrowning or antimicrobial effect was observed in fresh-cut potato under SAS + UV-C treatment compared with the SAS treatment; thus, it was concluded that SAS combined UV-C treatment did not promote the effect in protection of the storage abilities of fresh-cut potatoes.In summary, SAS treatment was the most effective method in antibrowning and antimicrobial effects in fresh-cut potatoes during storage, and it was even better than the UV-C treatment. But combination of the selected SAS concentration and UV-C irradiation did not enhance the effects. In addition, the shelf life of fresh-cut potatoes can reach 22 d when SAS combined with UV-C, and it was maintained no more than 5 d when treated with control or UV-C alone. Thus, SAS is effective in controlling quality of fresh-cut produce during storage.



---

*Source: 5980964-2017-07-30.xml*