# Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors of Lung Cancer-Associated Acute Ischemic Stroke

Authors: Jiacai Lin; Siting Wu; Rui Xu; Qiang Shi; Chenglin Tian; Fang Cui; Xue Shao; Hui Liu
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

Objective. To research the clinical characteristics and risk factors of lung cancer-associated acute ischemic stroke (LCA-AIS). Methods. Patients diagnosed with LCA-AIS, simple lung cancer, and simple AIS were enrolled. The primary information, laboratory results, tumor histopathology, neurological deficits, and survival time of the patients were collected and analyzed. Results. (1) In the LCA-AIS group, the pathology of 69.56% patients were adenocarcinoma, and the proportion of poorly differentiated patients was significantly more than that in moderately differentiated or highly differentiated. The number of stage IV lung cancer patients in the LCA-AIS group was significantly more common than in other stages. (2) 56.52% of patients with lung cancer were diagnosed before AIS, and the peak of AIS attack was 1–6 months after the diagnosis of lung cancer. (3) The independent risk factors of LCA-AIS were CYFRA-211 (OR 1.070; 95% confidence interval 1.005, 1.139; p=0.035), TT (OR 1.275; 95% confidence interval 1.089, 1.493; p=0.003), and Hct (OR 0.878; 95% confidence interval 0.779, 0.990; p=0.034), making ROC curve, suggesting the area under the curve is 0.871. (4) The neurological deficit of patients in the LCA-AIS group was similar to the simple AIS group and could not be identified by the severity of neurological deficits. (5) The median survival time of LCA-AIS group patients was five months (95% confidence interval 3.796, 6.204). There were statistical differences in survival time between LCA-AIS group and simple AIS group patients (p<0.001).Conclusions. The interaction between lung cancer and AIS may shorten patients’ life expectancy and worsen their quality of life.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In 1865, Armand Trousseau first reported a causal relationship between occult gastric cancer and thrombosis and then was named Trousseau syndrome. With the deepening clinical and basic researches, the concept of Trousseau syndrome is widely used for cancer-related thrombosis. Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is one of the most important diseases related to thrombosis in the brain. Some studies in various countries have found that the incidence of AIS is significantly higher in cancer patients than in noncancer patients [1–7], but the specific causes are not clear. Most of the authors suggested in published articles that the biological indicators we should focus on cancer-associated AIS patients were D-dimers and carbohydrate tumor markers [8–12]. However, the research concerning clinical characteristics, risk factors, pathogenesis, and survival situation of cancer-associated AIS patients were rare. According to the National Cancer Center report, the highest incidence and mortality of cancer in China was of lung cancer [13]. In order to further understand the AIS characteristics and risk factors in lung cancer-associated acute ischemic stroke (LCA-AIS) patients, we collected the clinical data of those patients and explored its clinical features, risk factors, and prognosis.


## 2. Information and Methods

### 2.1. Clinical Information

#### 2.1.1. Diagnostic Criteria

(1) Lung cancer diagnostic criteria: the diagnosis of lung cancer based on pathological outcome. (2) AIS diagnostic criteria: the diagnosis of AIS was based on the American Heart Association diagnostic criteria for cerebral infarction and combined with the results of brain MRI examination. (3) LCA-AIS diagnostic criteria: (1) comply with the diagnostic criteria for lung cancer and AIS; (2) the onset time of AIS is later than lung cancer; (3) no common risk disease of AIS; and (4) through clinical discussion by two neurology attending physicians, AIS pathogenesis was considered to be related to lung cancer.


#### 2.1.2. Inclusion Criteria and Methods

A total of three groups of patients were divided into an LCA-AIS group, simple lung cancer group, and simple AIS group. 1. LCA-AIS group inclusion criteria: (1) patients with previous history of lung cancer and then attacked AIS or patients with AIS attack were found to have lung cancer during hospitalization; (2) no common risk diseases of AIS; (3) TOAST classification was classified “SUE;” and (4) discussed by two clinical attending physicians and considered that the cause of AIS was associated with lung cancer. (2) Simple lung cancer group inclusion criteria: (1) patients with lung cancer admitted to the hospital at the same time and had similar age as the LCA-AIS group patients; (2) no ischemic brain infarction according to the brain MRI result; and (3) After 6 months, the brain MRI was checked again, and no ischemic brain infarction lesions were found either. (3) Simple AIS group inclusion criteria: (1) patients with AIS admitted to the hospital at the same time and with similar age as LCA-AIS group patients; (2) after completing the relevant examination after hospitalization, it is clear that the patient did not have any cancer. Clinical primary data and laboratory results were compared with hospitalization date- (including three days before and after) and age- (difference of less than one year) matched patients in the LCA-AIS group, simple lung cancer group, and simple AIS group.


#### 2.1.3. Data Collection

Patients’ necessary information (including gender, age, underlying diseases, and tumor stage), laboratory results (including blood routine, blood coagulation, biochemistry, tumor markers, and tumor histopathology reports), imaging reports (including neck vascular ultrasound, brain MRI, and brain MRA), neurological deficits (mRS score), and follow-up information were collected.


### 2.2. Statistical Methods

All data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 20.0 software, and the level of significance was tested asp<0.05. Continuous variables with normal distribution were reported using mean and standard deviation, and the difference between the two groups was compared using paired t-test. Continuous variables with abnormal distribution were reported using median and interquartile range, and the difference between the two paired groups was compared using the Wilcoxon test. Categorical variables were reported with number and percentage, and the difference between the two groups was compared with the chi-square test. Independent risk factors analysis used logistic regression. Firstly, one-factor regression analysis of independent variables was performed, the entry method was used to calculate the p value, and the factors that have p value less than 0.1 were collected into the final regression equation. The application of the entry method was used to calculate the final p value, OR value, and 95% confidence interval. Survival curves generated by the Kaplan–Meier method and logarithmic rank method were used to compare the difference between the survival curves in two groups.


## 2.1. Clinical Information

### 2.1.1. Diagnostic Criteria

(1) Lung cancer diagnostic criteria: the diagnosis of lung cancer based on pathological outcome. (2) AIS diagnostic criteria: the diagnosis of AIS was based on the American Heart Association diagnostic criteria for cerebral infarction and combined with the results of brain MRI examination. (3) LCA-AIS diagnostic criteria: (1) comply with the diagnostic criteria for lung cancer and AIS; (2) the onset time of AIS is later than lung cancer; (3) no common risk disease of AIS; and (4) through clinical discussion by two neurology attending physicians, AIS pathogenesis was considered to be related to lung cancer.


### 2.1.2. Inclusion Criteria and Methods

A total of three groups of patients were divided into an LCA-AIS group, simple lung cancer group, and simple AIS group. 1. LCA-AIS group inclusion criteria: (1) patients with previous history of lung cancer and then attacked AIS or patients with AIS attack were found to have lung cancer during hospitalization; (2) no common risk diseases of AIS; (3) TOAST classification was classified “SUE;” and (4) discussed by two clinical attending physicians and considered that the cause of AIS was associated with lung cancer. (2) Simple lung cancer group inclusion criteria: (1) patients with lung cancer admitted to the hospital at the same time and had similar age as the LCA-AIS group patients; (2) no ischemic brain infarction according to the brain MRI result; and (3) After 6 months, the brain MRI was checked again, and no ischemic brain infarction lesions were found either. (3) Simple AIS group inclusion criteria: (1) patients with AIS admitted to the hospital at the same time and with similar age as LCA-AIS group patients; (2) after completing the relevant examination after hospitalization, it is clear that the patient did not have any cancer. Clinical primary data and laboratory results were compared with hospitalization date- (including three days before and after) and age- (difference of less than one year) matched patients in the LCA-AIS group, simple lung cancer group, and simple AIS group.


### 2.1.3. Data Collection

Patients’ necessary information (including gender, age, underlying diseases, and tumor stage), laboratory results (including blood routine, blood coagulation, biochemistry, tumor markers, and tumor histopathology reports), imaging reports (including neck vascular ultrasound, brain MRI, and brain MRA), neurological deficits (mRS score), and follow-up information were collected.


## 2.1.1. Diagnostic Criteria

(1) Lung cancer diagnostic criteria: the diagnosis of lung cancer based on pathological outcome. (2) AIS diagnostic criteria: the diagnosis of AIS was based on the American Heart Association diagnostic criteria for cerebral infarction and combined with the results of brain MRI examination. (3) LCA-AIS diagnostic criteria: (1) comply with the diagnostic criteria for lung cancer and AIS; (2) the onset time of AIS is later than lung cancer; (3) no common risk disease of AIS; and (4) through clinical discussion by two neurology attending physicians, AIS pathogenesis was considered to be related to lung cancer.


## 2.1.2. Inclusion Criteria and Methods

A total of three groups of patients were divided into an LCA-AIS group, simple lung cancer group, and simple AIS group. 1. LCA-AIS group inclusion criteria: (1) patients with previous history of lung cancer and then attacked AIS or patients with AIS attack were found to have lung cancer during hospitalization; (2) no common risk diseases of AIS; (3) TOAST classification was classified “SUE;” and (4) discussed by two clinical attending physicians and considered that the cause of AIS was associated with lung cancer. (2) Simple lung cancer group inclusion criteria: (1) patients with lung cancer admitted to the hospital at the same time and had similar age as the LCA-AIS group patients; (2) no ischemic brain infarction according to the brain MRI result; and (3) After 6 months, the brain MRI was checked again, and no ischemic brain infarction lesions were found either. (3) Simple AIS group inclusion criteria: (1) patients with AIS admitted to the hospital at the same time and with similar age as LCA-AIS group patients; (2) after completing the relevant examination after hospitalization, it is clear that the patient did not have any cancer. Clinical primary data and laboratory results were compared with hospitalization date- (including three days before and after) and age- (difference of less than one year) matched patients in the LCA-AIS group, simple lung cancer group, and simple AIS group.


## 2.1.3. Data Collection

Patients’ necessary information (including gender, age, underlying diseases, and tumor stage), laboratory results (including blood routine, blood coagulation, biochemistry, tumor markers, and tumor histopathology reports), imaging reports (including neck vascular ultrasound, brain MRI, and brain MRA), neurological deficits (mRS score), and follow-up information were collected.


## 2.2. Statistical Methods

All data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 20.0 software, and the level of significance was tested asp<0.05. Continuous variables with normal distribution were reported using mean and standard deviation, and the difference between the two groups was compared using paired t-test. Continuous variables with abnormal distribution were reported using median and interquartile range, and the difference between the two paired groups was compared using the Wilcoxon test. Categorical variables were reported with number and percentage, and the difference between the two groups was compared with the chi-square test. Independent risk factors analysis used logistic regression. Firstly, one-factor regression analysis of independent variables was performed, the entry method was used to calculate the p value, and the factors that have p value less than 0.1 were collected into the final regression equation. The application of the entry method was used to calculate the final p value, OR value, and 95% confidence interval. Survival curves generated by the Kaplan–Meier method and logarithmic rank method were used to compare the difference between the survival curves in two groups.


## 3. Result

### 3.1. Basic Information

We enrolled 46 patients in each LCA-AIS group, simple lung cancer group, and simple AIS group during January 2014 to December 2018 in Hainan Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital. There were 29 males and 17 females in the LCA-AIS group, with an average age of 65.80 ± 11.75 years. There were 25 males and 21 females in simple lung cancer group, with an average age of 65.59 ± 11.73 years. There were 28 males and 18 females in the simple AIS group, with an average age of 65.80 ± 11.75 years. In the LCA-AIS group, the pathology of lung cancer was more common in adenocarcinoma (69.56%), the proportion of poorly differentiated patients (78.26%) was significantly more than that in moderately differentiated or highly differentiated, and the stages of lung cancer were significantly more common in stage IV (76.08%). There was no significant difference in basic information of patients between the LCA-AIS group and simple lung cancer group Table1.Table 1
Basic information of patients in the LCA-AIS group and simple lung cancer group.
LCA-AIS group
Simple lung cancer group
p value
Male
29 (63.04%)
25 (54.38%)
0.397
Average age
65.80 ± 11.75
65.59 ± 11.73
0.133
Smoke
7 (15.22%)
11 (23.91%)
0.293
Hypertension
0 (0%)
3 (6.52%)
0.242
Diabetes
0 (0%)
2 (4.35%)
0.495
Coronary heart disease
0 (0%)
3 (6.52%)
0.242
Atrial fibrillation
0 (0%)
1 (2.17%)
1.000
Lung cancer pathology
Adenocarcinoma
32 (69.56%)
34 (73.91%)
0.886
Squamous cell carcinoma
12 (26.08%)
10 (21.73%)
Small-cell lung cancer
2 (4.34%)
2 (4.34%)
Adenocarcinoma
Poorly differentiated
24 (52.17%)
25 (54.34%)
0.861
Moderately differentiated
7 (15.21%)
7 (15.21%)
Highly differentiated
1 (2.17%)
2 (4.34%)
Squamous cell carcinoma
Poorly differentiated
12 (26.08%)
9 (19.56%)
0.455
Moderately differentiated
0 (0%)
1 (2.17%)
Highly differentiated
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Lung cancer staging
I
3 (6.52%)
4 (8.69%)
0.978
II
3 (6.52%)
3 (6.52%)
III
3 (6.52%)
5 (10.86%)
IV
35 (76.08%)
32 (69.56%)
Limit period
(small-cell lung cancer)
1 (2.17%)
1 (2.17%)
Extensive period
(small-cell lung cancer)
1 (2.17%)
1 (2.17%)


### 3.2. Relationship between Lung Cancer and AIS Onset Time in Patients with LCA-AIS

In the LCA-AIS group, 20 patients (43.48%) were found to attack AIS as the first onset form, and 26 patients (56.52%) attacked AIS after diagnosis of lung cancer. The peak period of AIS in patients with lung cancer appears in 1–6 months after the diagnosis of lung cancer, and then the risk of AIS attack decreased. Another peak occurred in the interval of above 24 months, combined with medical history, and it was found that those patients had lung cancer progression before the onset of AIS attack Figure1.Figure 1
Relationship between lung cancer and AIS onset time in patients with LCA-AIS.


### 3.3. Analysis of Laboratory Results

The results of the patient’s blood test routine, coagulation, and tumor markers were collected and analyzed by regression analysis (Table2). The independent risk factors of LCA-AIS were CYFRA-211 (OR 1.070; 95% confidence interval 1.005, 1.139; p=0.035); TT (OR 1.275; 95% confidence interval 1.089, 1.493; p=0.003); and Hct (OR 0.878; 95% confidence interval 0.779, 0.990; p=0.034). There was no significant statistical difference in residual CA125 (p=0.243), CA153 (p=0.085), NSE (p=0.418), D-dimer (p=0.879), and INR (p=0.295). We combined three important variables (CYFRA-211; TT; Hct) into the logistic regression together to calculate the probability and made the ROC curve based on the probability we obtained. It was suggested that the area under the curve is 0.871 Figure 2.Table 2
One-factor regression analysis of various laboratory indicators between the LCA-AIS group and simple lung cancer group.
LCA-AIS group
Simple lung cancer group
p value
OR
95% CI
CEA
12.81 (3.79, 81.30)
5.24 (2.14, 44.50)
0.955
1.000
0.999, 1.001
AFP
2.34 (1.88, 3.32)
2.91 (2.45, 4.13)
0.893
1.011
0.865, 1.181
CA125
130.95 (31.00, 365.38)
25.52 (11.37, 72.59)
0.031
1.002
1.000, 1.004
CA199
27.72 (11.32, 80.45)
18.37 (8.19, 37.52)
0.123
1.002
0.999, 1.005
CA153
31.44 (18.13, 92.82)
17.76 (11.75, 23.82)
0.06
1.006
1.000, 1.013
CA724
4.72 (2.17, 17.66)
2.18 (1.06, 4.99)
0.141
1.011
0.996, 1.025
CYFRA-211
14.90 (5.78, 41.37)
3.05 (1.94, 5.29)
<0.001
1.099
1.044, 1.156
NSE
18.18 (13.43, 25.88)
13.52 (11.16, 14.99)
0.03
1.051
1.055, 1.100
D-dimer
1736.50 (434.00, 4240.5)
368.50 (100.50, 1096.75)
0.001
1.001
1.000, 1.001
INR
1.10 ± 0.11
1.03 ± 0.09
0.005
552.169
6.835, 44610.332
PT
13.37 ± 1.63
12.56 ± 1.63
0.023
1.364
1.044, 1.782
PTA
89.67 ± 15.55
97.82 ± 15.39
0.017
0.966
0.939, 0.994
TT
19.72 ± 3.97
16.70 ± 4.08
0.001
1.199
1.075, 1.337
FIB
3.59 ± 1.81
3.74 ± 1.14
0.631
0.935
0.712, 1.229
APTT
32.41 ± 7.30
31.12 ± 5.32
0.337
1.033
0.967, 1.104
Hb
110.73 ± 22.67
123.89 ± 17.31
0.004
0.968
0.946, 0.990
RBC
3.99 ± 0.82
4.36 ± 0.48
0.015
0.431
0.218, 0.852
Hct
33 ± 6
37 ± 4
0.002
0.878
0.808, 0.954
MCV
85.44 ± 9.12
87.68 ± 6.73
0.188
0.964
0.913, 1.018
MCH
27.87 ± 3.53
28.58 ± 2.84
0.297
0.932
0.816, 1.064
MCHC
326.5 ± 14.72
325.50 ± 14.14
0.737
1.005
0.977, 1.034
PLT
226.15 ± 99.91
255.00 ± 87.87
0.149
0.997
0.992, 1.001Figure 2
ROC curve analysis for the CYFRA-211, TT, and Hct value in the LCA-AIS group and simple lung cancer group.


### 3.4. Assessment of Neurological Deficits

The neurological deficits in the LCA-AIS group and the simple AIS group were analyzed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. In the LCA-AIS group, we found totally 33 patients (71.74%) with clinical neurological deficits (mRS score ≥1 point), 13 patients (28.26%) with clinical disability (mRS score ≥2 point), and 11 patients (23.91%) with moderate or above disability who need other people to help with their lives (mRS score ≥3 point). In the simple AIS group, we found also totally 33 patients (71.74%) with clinical neurological deficits (mRS score ≥1 point), 15 patients (32.61%) with clinical disability (mRS score ≥2 point), and 12 patients (26.09%) with moderate or severe disability who need other people to help with their lives (mRS score ≥3 point). The clinical neurological deficits in patients with LCA-AIS and simple AIS were mainly characterized by central facial lingual dysfunction, dysarthria, aphasia, limb dysfunction, and dyskinesia. It was found that the neurological deficits were similar, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.893) Figure 3.Figure 3
Comparison of mRS scores between the LCA-AIS group and simple AIS group.


### 3.5. Survival of Patients in the LCA-AIS Group and Simple AIS Group

The date of AIS attack in the LCA-AIS group was used as a starting point and death due to tumor and AIS as an endpoint. In the LCA-AIS group, it was found that 17 patients (36.95%) survived after six months, and the median survival time was five months (95% confidence interval 3.796, 6.204). In the simple AIS group, we found that 41 patients (89.13%) survived after six months. After comparing the survival function of patients in the LCA-AIS group and simple AIS group, there were statistical differences in survival time between the two groups (p<0.001) Figure 4.Figure 4
Patient survival function in the LCA-AIS group and simple AIS group.


## 3.1. Basic Information

We enrolled 46 patients in each LCA-AIS group, simple lung cancer group, and simple AIS group during January 2014 to December 2018 in Hainan Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital. There were 29 males and 17 females in the LCA-AIS group, with an average age of 65.80 ± 11.75 years. There were 25 males and 21 females in simple lung cancer group, with an average age of 65.59 ± 11.73 years. There were 28 males and 18 females in the simple AIS group, with an average age of 65.80 ± 11.75 years. In the LCA-AIS group, the pathology of lung cancer was more common in adenocarcinoma (69.56%), the proportion of poorly differentiated patients (78.26%) was significantly more than that in moderately differentiated or highly differentiated, and the stages of lung cancer were significantly more common in stage IV (76.08%). There was no significant difference in basic information of patients between the LCA-AIS group and simple lung cancer group Table1.Table 1
Basic information of patients in the LCA-AIS group and simple lung cancer group.
LCA-AIS group
Simple lung cancer group
p value
Male
29 (63.04%)
25 (54.38%)
0.397
Average age
65.80 ± 11.75
65.59 ± 11.73
0.133
Smoke
7 (15.22%)
11 (23.91%)
0.293
Hypertension
0 (0%)
3 (6.52%)
0.242
Diabetes
0 (0%)
2 (4.35%)
0.495
Coronary heart disease
0 (0%)
3 (6.52%)
0.242
Atrial fibrillation
0 (0%)
1 (2.17%)
1.000
Lung cancer pathology
Adenocarcinoma
32 (69.56%)
34 (73.91%)
0.886
Squamous cell carcinoma
12 (26.08%)
10 (21.73%)
Small-cell lung cancer
2 (4.34%)
2 (4.34%)
Adenocarcinoma
Poorly differentiated
24 (52.17%)
25 (54.34%)
0.861
Moderately differentiated
7 (15.21%)
7 (15.21%)
Highly differentiated
1 (2.17%)
2 (4.34%)
Squamous cell carcinoma
Poorly differentiated
12 (26.08%)
9 (19.56%)
0.455
Moderately differentiated
0 (0%)
1 (2.17%)
Highly differentiated
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Lung cancer staging
I
3 (6.52%)
4 (8.69%)
0.978
II
3 (6.52%)
3 (6.52%)
III
3 (6.52%)
5 (10.86%)
IV
35 (76.08%)
32 (69.56%)
Limit period
(small-cell lung cancer)
1 (2.17%)
1 (2.17%)
Extensive period
(small-cell lung cancer)
1 (2.17%)
1 (2.17%)


## 3.2. Relationship between Lung Cancer and AIS Onset Time in Patients with LCA-AIS

In the LCA-AIS group, 20 patients (43.48%) were found to attack AIS as the first onset form, and 26 patients (56.52%) attacked AIS after diagnosis of lung cancer. The peak period of AIS in patients with lung cancer appears in 1–6 months after the diagnosis of lung cancer, and then the risk of AIS attack decreased. Another peak occurred in the interval of above 24 months, combined with medical history, and it was found that those patients had lung cancer progression before the onset of AIS attack Figure1.Figure 1
Relationship between lung cancer and AIS onset time in patients with LCA-AIS.


## 3.3. Analysis of Laboratory Results

The results of the patient’s blood test routine, coagulation, and tumor markers were collected and analyzed by regression analysis (Table2). The independent risk factors of LCA-AIS were CYFRA-211 (OR 1.070; 95% confidence interval 1.005, 1.139; p=0.035); TT (OR 1.275; 95% confidence interval 1.089, 1.493; p=0.003); and Hct (OR 0.878; 95% confidence interval 0.779, 0.990; p=0.034). There was no significant statistical difference in residual CA125 (p=0.243), CA153 (p=0.085), NSE (p=0.418), D-dimer (p=0.879), and INR (p=0.295). We combined three important variables (CYFRA-211; TT; Hct) into the logistic regression together to calculate the probability and made the ROC curve based on the probability we obtained. It was suggested that the area under the curve is 0.871 Figure 2.Table 2
One-factor regression analysis of various laboratory indicators between the LCA-AIS group and simple lung cancer group.
LCA-AIS group
Simple lung cancer group
p value
OR
95% CI
CEA
12.81 (3.79, 81.30)
5.24 (2.14, 44.50)
0.955
1.000
0.999, 1.001
AFP
2.34 (1.88, 3.32)
2.91 (2.45, 4.13)
0.893
1.011
0.865, 1.181
CA125
130.95 (31.00, 365.38)
25.52 (11.37, 72.59)
0.031
1.002
1.000, 1.004
CA199
27.72 (11.32, 80.45)
18.37 (8.19, 37.52)
0.123
1.002
0.999, 1.005
CA153
31.44 (18.13, 92.82)
17.76 (11.75, 23.82)
0.06
1.006
1.000, 1.013
CA724
4.72 (2.17, 17.66)
2.18 (1.06, 4.99)
0.141
1.011
0.996, 1.025
CYFRA-211
14.90 (5.78, 41.37)
3.05 (1.94, 5.29)
<0.001
1.099
1.044, 1.156
NSE
18.18 (13.43, 25.88)
13.52 (11.16, 14.99)
0.03
1.051
1.055, 1.100
D-dimer
1736.50 (434.00, 4240.5)
368.50 (100.50, 1096.75)
0.001
1.001
1.000, 1.001
INR
1.10 ± 0.11
1.03 ± 0.09
0.005
552.169
6.835, 44610.332
PT
13.37 ± 1.63
12.56 ± 1.63
0.023
1.364
1.044, 1.782
PTA
89.67 ± 15.55
97.82 ± 15.39
0.017
0.966
0.939, 0.994
TT
19.72 ± 3.97
16.70 ± 4.08
0.001
1.199
1.075, 1.337
FIB
3.59 ± 1.81
3.74 ± 1.14
0.631
0.935
0.712, 1.229
APTT
32.41 ± 7.30
31.12 ± 5.32
0.337
1.033
0.967, 1.104
Hb
110.73 ± 22.67
123.89 ± 17.31
0.004
0.968
0.946, 0.990
RBC
3.99 ± 0.82
4.36 ± 0.48
0.015
0.431
0.218, 0.852
Hct
33 ± 6
37 ± 4
0.002
0.878
0.808, 0.954
MCV
85.44 ± 9.12
87.68 ± 6.73
0.188
0.964
0.913, 1.018
MCH
27.87 ± 3.53
28.58 ± 2.84
0.297
0.932
0.816, 1.064
MCHC
326.5 ± 14.72
325.50 ± 14.14
0.737
1.005
0.977, 1.034
PLT
226.15 ± 99.91
255.00 ± 87.87
0.149
0.997
0.992, 1.001Figure 2
ROC curve analysis for the CYFRA-211, TT, and Hct value in the LCA-AIS group and simple lung cancer group.


## 3.4. Assessment of Neurological Deficits

The neurological deficits in the LCA-AIS group and the simple AIS group were analyzed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. In the LCA-AIS group, we found totally 33 patients (71.74%) with clinical neurological deficits (mRS score ≥1 point), 13 patients (28.26%) with clinical disability (mRS score ≥2 point), and 11 patients (23.91%) with moderate or above disability who need other people to help with their lives (mRS score ≥3 point). In the simple AIS group, we found also totally 33 patients (71.74%) with clinical neurological deficits (mRS score ≥1 point), 15 patients (32.61%) with clinical disability (mRS score ≥2 point), and 12 patients (26.09%) with moderate or severe disability who need other people to help with their lives (mRS score ≥3 point). The clinical neurological deficits in patients with LCA-AIS and simple AIS were mainly characterized by central facial lingual dysfunction, dysarthria, aphasia, limb dysfunction, and dyskinesia. It was found that the neurological deficits were similar, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.893) Figure 3.Figure 3
Comparison of mRS scores between the LCA-AIS group and simple AIS group.


## 3.5. Survival of Patients in the LCA-AIS Group and Simple AIS Group

The date of AIS attack in the LCA-AIS group was used as a starting point and death due to tumor and AIS as an endpoint. In the LCA-AIS group, it was found that 17 patients (36.95%) survived after six months, and the median survival time was five months (95% confidence interval 3.796, 6.204). In the simple AIS group, we found that 41 patients (89.13%) survived after six months. After comparing the survival function of patients in the LCA-AIS group and simple AIS group, there were statistical differences in survival time between the two groups (p<0.001) Figure 4.Figure 4
Patient survival function in the LCA-AIS group and simple AIS group.


## 4. Discussion

Cancer and AIS have become the most common causes of death among the elderly in the world. The World Health Organization estimated that there were 18.1 million new cancer cases and 9.6 million cancer deaths worldwide in 2018 and that the number of people who have cancer worldwide is rapidly growing [14]. The relationship between cancer and AIS is now being recognized, so with the rapid increase in the number of cancer patients, we expected that the number of cancer-associated AIS would also increase year by year. A recent research indicated there was a positive association between stroke and any cancer in men and women, and the association was significant for cancers of respiratory and intrathoracic organs [15]. Several cohort studies also have found that lung cancer, colon cancer, rectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, central nervous system cancer, stomach cancer, and ovarian cancer can increase the risk of AIS attacks, but breast cancer has no significant association with increased risk of AIS [12, 16–18], suggesting the probability of causing AIS attacks is different in different types of cancer, and it is speculated that the mechanism and the indicators of AIS in different types of cancer also may be different. Because lung cancer has the highest incidence and mortality in China, this study mainly aimed at LCA-AIS patients.Our study found that AIS can occur at any stage of lung cancer, and as the tumor progresses, the number of LCA-AIS patients shows an upward trend. So, we found the number of LCA-AIS patients in stage IV significantly more than in other stages. The number of LCA-AIS patients with lung adenocarcinoma cancer was found to be more than that of patients with squamous cell cancer, and pathologically poorly differentiated was significantly higher than that of moderately or highly differentiated. Adenocarcinoma cells can enhance thrombin by producing mucin and directly secrete into the blood to help make the hypercoagulable state. Meanwhile, mucin also can interact with specific cell adhesion molecules on endothelial cells, platelets, and lymphocytes to induce the formation of platelet-rich microthrombin [19].Our study found that AIS may be a unique precursor to occult lung cancer. 43.48% of patients in the LCA-AIS group were found to have lung cancer due to attack of AIS in our research. In the LCA-AIS patients group, the peak incidence of AIS was 1–6 months after the diagnosis of lung cancer; the risk would persist, but it shows a downward trend. The results suggested that for patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer, the brain MRI should be closely improved within the first six months to determine whether or not attacked AIS.As mentioned before, the mechanism and the indicators of AIS in different types of cancer may be different. However, the research focused on the risk factors of LCA-AIS patients is sporadic at present. Xie et al. [8] found that LCA-AIS patients had higher blood levels of CA125 and CA199 compared with simple lung cancer patients, but the study involved few related tumor markers and cannot completely exclude the possibility of simple lung cancer group patients occur AIS in short period after recruitment. There are few reports suggesting that independent risk factors of multiple types of cancer-associated AIS patients are D-dimer and carbohydrate tumor markers [1, 20–22]. Considering the reason, we thought it may be related to the difference in the mechanism, pathological type, and different cancers. The statistical analysis of multiple types of tumors may result in an offset, which may result in different results.CYFRA-211 is a soluble fragment of cytokeratin 19, which has positive significance for the diagnosis of non-small-cell lung cancer. The degree of elevated concentration is clinically suggestive of the progression and severity of lung cancer and can also predict the prognosis of lung cancer patients. Our study found that CYFRA-211 was an independent risk factor for LCA-AIS patients. For every 1 ng/ml increase in concentration, the risk of AIS attacks increases by 7%. Cancer cells can activate the body’s coagulation mechanism by releasing many tissue factors, cancer-associated procoagulant, and cyokines, and cancer cells also can interact with platelets to release ADP, arachidonic acid, 5-HT, and other substances to promote blood coagulation. Eventually, the body will be hypercoagulable [23–27]. Bang’s recent research showed circulating tumor extracellular vesicles, especially in adenocarcinoma patients, also played a vital role in cancer-associated thrombosis and tumor progression [28, 29]. However, our study also found that TT was also an independent risk factor for LCA-AIS patients. We found that the risk of AIS increased by 8.9% for every 1s prolong of TT. TT prolongation indicates that there is hyperfibrinolysis in the body. Considering the LCA-AIS group, the fibrinolytic mechanism was activated, and the body was in the secondary fibrinolysis stage. Therefore, it is speculated that the pathogenesis of LCA-AIS may not only be related to the activation of the blood coagulation mechanism but also related to the activation of the fibrinolysis mechanism, which ultimately leads to the onset of AIS. Hct refers to the ratio of red blood cells to total blood volume and is an indicator that reflects the number, size, and volume of red blood cells. It can directly affect the ability of red blood cells to carry oxygen transport and also plays an essential role in regulating blood flow. The role of Hct in noncancer patients attack acute cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events remains controversial. However, in our study, we found a negative correlation between Hct and LCA-AIS, with every 1% increase in Hct and 12.2% reduction in AIS risk. Hypoglobinemia due to cancer progression led to impaired oxygen transport, while the brain was highly dependent on oxygen supply and had no oxygen storage capacity. Therefore, when the red blood cells were insufficiently supplied with oxygen, the AIS may attack.In terms of neurological deficits, there was no significant difference between the patients in the LCA-AIS group and those in the simple AIS group, although almost 30% of patients have moderate disability in each group. The patients with localized neurological deficits were mainly characterized, and the symptoms and degrees of neurological deficits were very similar between LCA-AIS patients and simple AIS patients. Patients with LCA-AIS are faced with multiple risks. The progression of lung cancer and the complications of AIS had a dual impact on patient survival time. Our study found that the median survival time of LCA-AIS patients was only five months. Meanwhile, nearly 90% of patients in the simple AIS group survived later than six months.


## 5. Conclusion

The interaction between lung cancer and AIS may shorten patients’ life expectancy and worsen their quality of life.



---

*Source: 6021037-2019-12-18.xml*