# Efficacy of Faecal Microbiota Transplantation for the Treatment of Autism in Children: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Authors: Danrong Zhu; Xinyu Jin; Piao Guo; Yue Sun; Li Zhou; Yan Qing; Weisong Shen; Guozhong Ji
Journal: Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 (2023)

---

## Abstract

Objective. Evidence-based research methods were applied to assess the efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for the treatment of autism in children. Methods. We searched the Chinese Biomedical Literature, CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases to collect randomised controlled trials on faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of autism in children. The search included studies published from the creation of the respective database to 5 April 2022. Literature screening, data extraction, and quality evaluation were implemented by three investigators according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.1 software. Results. Nine studies with population-based subjects and four studies with animal-based subjects were included. Five papers were screened for the meta-analysis. The results showed that FMT markedly reduced Autism Behaviour Checklist (ABC) scores in children with autism spectrum disorder (weighted mean difference (WMD) = −14.96; 95% confidence intervals (CI), −21.68 to −8.24; P<0.001; I2 = 0%). FMT also reduced Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) scores (WMD = −6.95; 95% CI, −8.76 to −5.14; P<0.001; I2 = 28.1%). Conclusion. Our results indicate that FMT can benefit children with autism by reducing ABC and CARS scores, but more high-quality studies are needed to verify these results.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by impaired social communicative skills, communication deficits, and recurrent and constrained behaviours that are thought to be due to altered neurotransmission processes. The prevalence of ASD in children in the U.S. has gradually increased in the past few years. The prevalence of ASD was 1.46% in 2012 and increased to 2.41% in 2016 [1]. Males are more than four times more likely to acquire ASD than women [2]. ASD is a major global mental health problem and continues to grow [3]. However, the pathogenesis of ASD remains obscure. Genetic factors [4], immune modulation disorders [5], inflammation [6], and exposure to environmental toxins [7] may be associated with the development of ASD. ASD is highly heterogeneous [8], and no particularly effective treatment for ASD has been identified. Behavioural interventions remain the mainstay of ASD treatment but several potentially targeted treatments have emerged in the past few years that address the underlying causes of ASD [9].Faecal microbial transplantation (FMT) is the process of extracting the relevant flora from the faeces of a healthy person and transplanting the flora to another patient. FMT is intended to treat diverse diseases in which the intestinal flora is involved. FMT was initially recognized as the most effective treatment for recurrentClostridium difficile infections [10]. However, further research revealed that FMT may be useful for the treatment of a variety of diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [11], cancer [12, 13], some neurological disorders [14, 15], hyperlipidemia [16], and even aging [17]. As to neurological disorders, FMT has a positive effect on multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease in several animal studies and some human case reports [14].The gut microbiota may play an important role in ASD [18]. Microbial treatment of autism using FMT is gaining more and more attention [19]. To date, few studies have been published for the systematic meta-analysis of FMT for ASD. At the same time, the direct association between microbiome and ASD may be limited [20]. Thus, we aimed to perform an up-to-date meta-analysis of RCTs to evaluate the efficacy of FMT in ASD.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Search Strategy

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on faecal microbial transplantation for autism published in China and foreign countries before 5 April 2022 were collected using computer searches of the China Knowledge Network, Wanfang, Vipshop, China Biomedical Literature, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and other databases. The Chinese search terms included faecal microbial transplantation, faecal flora transplantation, faecal bacteria transplantation, and autism. The English search terms included FMT, ASD, faecal microbiota transplantation, faecal microbiota transfusion, stool microbiota transplantation, and stool microbiota transfusion. The publication languages were restricted to Chinese and English. Additional relevant resources and references for inclusion in the literature were also manually searched.


### 2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The following inclusion criteria were used:(1) RCTs, with or without the blinded method and with or without lost visits; (2) age <18 years; (3) and meeting the diagnostic criteria of DSM-5-TR in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders developed by the American Psychiatric Association; (4) FMT was used for the treatment of ASD; and (5) FMT through different ways were all permitted. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) duplicate publications, literature review, case report, and systematic evaluation and (2) study did not provide enough information.


### 2.3. Literature Evaluation and Data Extraction

Three researchers (ZDR, JXY, and GP) independently read the title and abstract of each publication and carefully read the full text of the literature that might be included in the meta-analysis. The data were independently extracted and cross-checked by the same three researchers. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. Authors were contacted for consultation if the information was incomplete; the publication was recorded as unclear if the information was still not available. The following information was extracted from the full text: first author, year of publication, population, study design, the strategy of therapy, treatment time, follow-up after FMT, administration route, gastrointestinal, and neurological effects of treatment.


### 2.4. Quality Assessment

The assessment of study quality was performed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Six categories of risk bias were evaluated: selection bias, performance bias, detection bias, attrition bias, reporting bias, and other sources of bias.


### 2.5. Statistical Analysis and Meta-Analysis

Data were statistically analyzed using the Review Manager software (version 5.1.0; Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK). A weighted mean difference (WMD) with corresponding 95% confidence (CI) was calculated using study-specific means and SD. Evaluation of heterogeneity among the studies was performed using the CochranQ test and I2 statistics. The data were pooled for a fixed-effects model with no heterogeneity, while a random-effects model was used if there was heterogeneity. Publication biases were evaluated using Egger’s and Begg’s tests with funnel plots. Sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the stability of the results by combining the results after excluding one study at a time. P<0.05 was considered significant.


## 2.1. Search Strategy

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on faecal microbial transplantation for autism published in China and foreign countries before 5 April 2022 were collected using computer searches of the China Knowledge Network, Wanfang, Vipshop, China Biomedical Literature, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and other databases. The Chinese search terms included faecal microbial transplantation, faecal flora transplantation, faecal bacteria transplantation, and autism. The English search terms included FMT, ASD, faecal microbiota transplantation, faecal microbiota transfusion, stool microbiota transplantation, and stool microbiota transfusion. The publication languages were restricted to Chinese and English. Additional relevant resources and references for inclusion in the literature were also manually searched.


## 2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The following inclusion criteria were used:(1) RCTs, with or without the blinded method and with or without lost visits; (2) age <18 years; (3) and meeting the diagnostic criteria of DSM-5-TR in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders developed by the American Psychiatric Association; (4) FMT was used for the treatment of ASD; and (5) FMT through different ways were all permitted. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) duplicate publications, literature review, case report, and systematic evaluation and (2) study did not provide enough information.


## 2.3. Literature Evaluation and Data Extraction

Three researchers (ZDR, JXY, and GP) independently read the title and abstract of each publication and carefully read the full text of the literature that might be included in the meta-analysis. The data were independently extracted and cross-checked by the same three researchers. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. Authors were contacted for consultation if the information was incomplete; the publication was recorded as unclear if the information was still not available. The following information was extracted from the full text: first author, year of publication, population, study design, the strategy of therapy, treatment time, follow-up after FMT, administration route, gastrointestinal, and neurological effects of treatment.


## 2.4. Quality Assessment

The assessment of study quality was performed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Six categories of risk bias were evaluated: selection bias, performance bias, detection bias, attrition bias, reporting bias, and other sources of bias.


## 2.5. Statistical Analysis and Meta-Analysis

Data were statistically analyzed using the Review Manager software (version 5.1.0; Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK). A weighted mean difference (WMD) with corresponding 95% confidence (CI) was calculated using study-specific means and SD. Evaluation of heterogeneity among the studies was performed using the CochranQ test and I2 statistics. The data were pooled for a fixed-effects model with no heterogeneity, while a random-effects model was used if there was heterogeneity. Publication biases were evaluated using Egger’s and Begg’s tests with funnel plots. Sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the stability of the results by combining the results after excluding one study at a time. P<0.05 was considered significant.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Characteristics of the Systematic Review Literature

A total of 31 relevant papers were obtained after a preliminary search. After reading the title, abstract, and full text, 13 RCTs were finally included, including nine studies with human subjects (Table1) and four studies with animal subjects (Table 2). The retrieved studies included 336 patients, comprised of 186 patients in the experimental group and 150 patients in the control group. The screening exclusion information is shown in Figure 1. Autism Behaviour Checklist (ABC) scores and Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) scores were usually used to assess improvement in neurological signs of ASD. Therefore, we performed them as outcome indicators in the meta-analysis. Among the nine studies included in the review, neither ABC nor CARS scores were shown in two studies. Besides, we could not obtain data from two papers. Finally, five studies were selected for meta-analysis.Table 1
Characteristics of included studies on humans.
ReferencePopulationStudy designSampleTherapyTreatment timeFollow-upafter FMTAdministration routeGI effects of treatmentNeurological effects of treatmentKang et al. [21]Autism Society of Greater Phoenix and the Autism/Asperger’s Research Program at Arizona State University, USAOpen-label clinical trialASD group:18 control group: 20MTT10 weeks8 weeks12 oral6 rectalGSRS: 77% decreaseDSR showed significant decreases in the number of days with abnormal or no stoolsCARS: decreased by 22% from the beginning to the end of the treatment and 24% after 8 weeks of no treatmentSRS and ABC improvement after FMTKang et al. [22]Autism Society of Greater Phoenix and the Autism/Asperger’s Research Program at Arizona State University, USAOpen-label clinical trialASD group: 18 control group: 20MTT10 weeks2 year12 oral6 rectalGSRS: 58% reductionDSR: 26% reductionCARS: the severity of ASD at the two-yearfollow-up was 47% lower than baselineSRS: 44% of participants were below the ASD diagnostic cut-off scoresABC: total scores continued to improve, and were 35% lower relative to baselineLi et al. [23]Department of Gastroenterology, Daping Hospital, ChinaOpen-label clinical trialASD group: 40TD group: 16FMT4 week8 week27 oral route13 colonicGSRS and DSR decreased after 4 weeks of FMT treatment and last for the next 8 weeksABC: significantly alleviated by the treatment, and no obvious reversion was observed during 8 weeks after FMTCARS: decreased by 10% at the end of the treatment and remained decreased by 6% after 8 weeksSRS: parents’ anxiety levels decreased decreased and social skill deficits improved at the end of treatment but reversed after 8 weeks without further treatmentKong et al. [24]Community recruited population, USARandomisation and blinding clinical trialProbiotic group: 18placebo group: 17Probiotic and oxytocin combination therapies28 weeksOralGIS showed no significant changesTrends of improvement in the total ABC score, stereotypic behaviour score, and SRS cognition score were observed in the combination therapy group (probiotic + OXT), although no significant differences were observed in the total scores or subscales of the ABC and SRSLuo [25]Autism Rehabilitation Training Institution, ChinaRandomisation and blinding clinical trial4 ASDFMT1 dayTwo monthsGastroscopic, colonoscopyNoneThe ABC scores decreased by an average of 25% after FMTZhao et al. (abstract only) [26]Hospital recruited population, ChinaOpen-label, randomised waitlist-controlled trialFMT group: 24Waitlist group: n = 21FMT group received twice FMT; waitlist group received rehabilitation trainingTwo monthsTwo monthsColonoscopy, gastroscopyNotable differences were also shown on GSI scores at F1 time pointCARS score in FMT group decreased 10.8%Waitlist group decreased 0.8% after the first FMT, and remained reduced after the second FMTGrimaldi et al. [27]Hospital recruited population, USAA randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-designed prebiotic clinical trialUnrestricted diet group (Prebiotics: 7; placebo: 7)exclusion diet group (prebiotics: 6; placebo: 6)Bimuno galactooligosaccharide6 weeks2 weeksOralA general trend of reduction in GI problems was reported, differences between treatments were not significantSignificant improvement in social behaviour scoresSantocchi et al. [28]The Child and Adolescence Mental Health services of Tuscany Region sd, Unit of Child Psychiatry and the Unit of Child Rehabilitation of IRCCS, Pisa, ItalyA randomised, blind, clinical trialProbiotics: 42 placebo: 43Probiotic preparation6 months0OralGreater improvements in some GI symptoms, adaptive functioning, and sensory profiles than in the GI group treated with a placeboPotentially positive effects of probiotics on core autism symptoms in a subset of ASD childrenLinda et al. (abstract only) [29]ASD subjectsCase series9 ASDFMTUnclearUnclearCapsules, enemaNAASD symptoms: unchanged in 21y.o., improved in one of two 8y.o., improved in younger subjects on a more long-lasting basis. Frequent regression, mostly after AB post-FMT, often improved after re-FMTTable 2
Characteristics of included studies on animals.
ReferenceSpeciesStudy designSampleTherapyAdministration routeGI effects of treatmentNeurological effects of treatmentChen et al. [30]ASD mouse modelSaline group (C);maternal immune activation mice offspring(M); gut microbiota group: original donor (M + F); vitro cultured donor (C + F)C: 5M: 10M + F: 7C + F: 8Gut microbiota transplantationGastric routeSignificantly modified several key differential taxa in gut microbial compositionAssessed by behavioural assessment (open field, three-chamber social, marble burying, and self-grooming) and serum levels of chemokinesGMT treatment with original and cultured donor gut microbiota significantly ameliorated anxiety-like and repetitive behavioursGoo et al. [31]Normal mice and Fmr1 KO mouse modelAnimal modelNAFMTGastric routeNoneFMT ameliorated autistic-like behaviours, especially memory deficits and social withdrawal by several behavioural testsSharon et al. [32]GF WT miceOffspring of mice with FMT from human ASD patientsRelevant groups: (all GF WT mice)FMT:(1) Offspring human mild ASD-FMT(2) Offspring human ASD-FMT(3) Offspring human ND-FMT14–121 per groupFMTOral gavageNo differences in intestinal barrier function or cytokines from ileum or colon between group 2 and group 3Assessed by marble burying (MB), open-field testing (OFT), and ultrasonic vocalization (USV), and the three-chamber sociability test (CST)MB, OFT, and USV: group 2 vs. other groups: more ASD-like behavioural deficits.3-CST: no differences.DSI: decreased in group 2 vs. 3. Alternative splicing pattern of ASD-relevant genes in brains of group 2 vs. 3Aabed et al. [33]PPA hamster modelAnimal model:FMT:(1) PPA + N-FMTNo FMT:(2) Control(3) PPA(4) Clindamycin(5) PPA + bee pollen(6) PPA + Propolis10 per groupFMTAnorectallyNAMore oxidative stress in brains of group 3 and 4 vs. all other groupsFigure 1
Flow diagram of included and excluded studies in the meta-analysis.


### 3.2. Quality Evaluation

The Cochrane Collaboration Network RCT risk of bias assessment tool was adopted to measure bias in the included literature [34]. This included random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, completeness of data, and selectivity. Among the five studies included in the meta-analysis, four were randomised trials and two conducted blinded trials. The quality of the five articles is presented in Figure 2. Most studies included in the review had high quality as a whole, while only one or two might be at high risk of performance bias and detection bias.Figure 2
Risk of bias assessment of included studies.


### 3.3. Forest Map Combined with ABC Scores as an Outcome Indicator

Based on the main indicators used to evaluate ASD, we identified five of them for further analysis. When using ABC scores as the outcome indicator,I2 = 0%, indicating no heterogeneity in the literature. Therefore, the results were analyzed using a fixed-effects model. The WMD with the corresponding 95% confidence (CI) demonstrated that ABC scores were significantly reduced after FMT (WMD = −14.96; 95% CI, −21.68 to −8.24; P<0.001) (Figure 3).Figure 3
Pooled estimates of ABC scores in meta-analysis.


### 3.4. Forest Map with CARS Scores as an Outcome Indicator

Based on the main indicators used to evaluate ASD, we selected four of them for further analysis. When using CARS scores as the outcome indicator,I2 = 28.1%, indicating a small heterogeneity in the literature. Therefore, a random-effects model was used to analyze the data. The WMD demonstrated that CARS scores were significantly reduced after FMT (WMD = −6.95; 95% CI, −8.76 to −5.14; P<0.001) (Figure 4).Figure 4
: Pooled estimates of CARS scores in meta-analysis.


### 3.5. Publication Bias

The outcomes of the Begg’s and Egger’s tests revealed no publication bias (PEgger = 0.175, PBegg = 0.221) (Figure 5).Figure 5
Plot of public bias. (a) Egger’s test:Y axis represents the standard normal deviate (SND) of ABC scores (effect estimate). SND is defined as the sample mean divided by the standard error. The method is to use SND to make regression analysis on the precision of effect estimation. (b) Begg’s test: Y axis represents standard error of weighted mean difference (WMD). WMD indicates the standardization of the effect estimate. The method is to use corrected rank correlation analysis to test the correlation between WMD and its standard error.
(a)(b)


### 3.6. Sensitivity Analysis

The sensitivity analysis showed that the exclusion of a study had no significant effect on the overall results. Therefore, the results were stable (Figure6).Figure 6
The plot of sensitivity analysis.


## 3.1. Characteristics of the Systematic Review Literature

A total of 31 relevant papers were obtained after a preliminary search. After reading the title, abstract, and full text, 13 RCTs were finally included, including nine studies with human subjects (Table1) and four studies with animal subjects (Table 2). The retrieved studies included 336 patients, comprised of 186 patients in the experimental group and 150 patients in the control group. The screening exclusion information is shown in Figure 1. Autism Behaviour Checklist (ABC) scores and Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) scores were usually used to assess improvement in neurological signs of ASD. Therefore, we performed them as outcome indicators in the meta-analysis. Among the nine studies included in the review, neither ABC nor CARS scores were shown in two studies. Besides, we could not obtain data from two papers. Finally, five studies were selected for meta-analysis.Table 1
Characteristics of included studies on humans.
ReferencePopulationStudy designSampleTherapyTreatment timeFollow-upafter FMTAdministration routeGI effects of treatmentNeurological effects of treatmentKang et al. [21]Autism Society of Greater Phoenix and the Autism/Asperger’s Research Program at Arizona State University, USAOpen-label clinical trialASD group:18 control group: 20MTT10 weeks8 weeks12 oral6 rectalGSRS: 77% decreaseDSR showed significant decreases in the number of days with abnormal or no stoolsCARS: decreased by 22% from the beginning to the end of the treatment and 24% after 8 weeks of no treatmentSRS and ABC improvement after FMTKang et al. [22]Autism Society of Greater Phoenix and the Autism/Asperger’s Research Program at Arizona State University, USAOpen-label clinical trialASD group: 18 control group: 20MTT10 weeks2 year12 oral6 rectalGSRS: 58% reductionDSR: 26% reductionCARS: the severity of ASD at the two-yearfollow-up was 47% lower than baselineSRS: 44% of participants were below the ASD diagnostic cut-off scoresABC: total scores continued to improve, and were 35% lower relative to baselineLi et al. [23]Department of Gastroenterology, Daping Hospital, ChinaOpen-label clinical trialASD group: 40TD group: 16FMT4 week8 week27 oral route13 colonicGSRS and DSR decreased after 4 weeks of FMT treatment and last for the next 8 weeksABC: significantly alleviated by the treatment, and no obvious reversion was observed during 8 weeks after FMTCARS: decreased by 10% at the end of the treatment and remained decreased by 6% after 8 weeksSRS: parents’ anxiety levels decreased decreased and social skill deficits improved at the end of treatment but reversed after 8 weeks without further treatmentKong et al. [24]Community recruited population, USARandomisation and blinding clinical trialProbiotic group: 18placebo group: 17Probiotic and oxytocin combination therapies28 weeksOralGIS showed no significant changesTrends of improvement in the total ABC score, stereotypic behaviour score, and SRS cognition score were observed in the combination therapy group (probiotic + OXT), although no significant differences were observed in the total scores or subscales of the ABC and SRSLuo [25]Autism Rehabilitation Training Institution, ChinaRandomisation and blinding clinical trial4 ASDFMT1 dayTwo monthsGastroscopic, colonoscopyNoneThe ABC scores decreased by an average of 25% after FMTZhao et al. (abstract only) [26]Hospital recruited population, ChinaOpen-label, randomised waitlist-controlled trialFMT group: 24Waitlist group: n = 21FMT group received twice FMT; waitlist group received rehabilitation trainingTwo monthsTwo monthsColonoscopy, gastroscopyNotable differences were also shown on GSI scores at F1 time pointCARS score in FMT group decreased 10.8%Waitlist group decreased 0.8% after the first FMT, and remained reduced after the second FMTGrimaldi et al. [27]Hospital recruited population, USAA randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-designed prebiotic clinical trialUnrestricted diet group (Prebiotics: 7; placebo: 7)exclusion diet group (prebiotics: 6; placebo: 6)Bimuno galactooligosaccharide6 weeks2 weeksOralA general trend of reduction in GI problems was reported, differences between treatments were not significantSignificant improvement in social behaviour scoresSantocchi et al. [28]The Child and Adolescence Mental Health services of Tuscany Region sd, Unit of Child Psychiatry and the Unit of Child Rehabilitation of IRCCS, Pisa, ItalyA randomised, blind, clinical trialProbiotics: 42 placebo: 43Probiotic preparation6 months0OralGreater improvements in some GI symptoms, adaptive functioning, and sensory profiles than in the GI group treated with a placeboPotentially positive effects of probiotics on core autism symptoms in a subset of ASD childrenLinda et al. (abstract only) [29]ASD subjectsCase series9 ASDFMTUnclearUnclearCapsules, enemaNAASD symptoms: unchanged in 21y.o., improved in one of two 8y.o., improved in younger subjects on a more long-lasting basis. Frequent regression, mostly after AB post-FMT, often improved after re-FMTTable 2
Characteristics of included studies on animals.
ReferenceSpeciesStudy designSampleTherapyAdministration routeGI effects of treatmentNeurological effects of treatmentChen et al. [30]ASD mouse modelSaline group (C);maternal immune activation mice offspring(M); gut microbiota group: original donor (M + F); vitro cultured donor (C + F)C: 5M: 10M + F: 7C + F: 8Gut microbiota transplantationGastric routeSignificantly modified several key differential taxa in gut microbial compositionAssessed by behavioural assessment (open field, three-chamber social, marble burying, and self-grooming) and serum levels of chemokinesGMT treatment with original and cultured donor gut microbiota significantly ameliorated anxiety-like and repetitive behavioursGoo et al. [31]Normal mice and Fmr1 KO mouse modelAnimal modelNAFMTGastric routeNoneFMT ameliorated autistic-like behaviours, especially memory deficits and social withdrawal by several behavioural testsSharon et al. [32]GF WT miceOffspring of mice with FMT from human ASD patientsRelevant groups: (all GF WT mice)FMT:(1) Offspring human mild ASD-FMT(2) Offspring human ASD-FMT(3) Offspring human ND-FMT14–121 per groupFMTOral gavageNo differences in intestinal barrier function or cytokines from ileum or colon between group 2 and group 3Assessed by marble burying (MB), open-field testing (OFT), and ultrasonic vocalization (USV), and the three-chamber sociability test (CST)MB, OFT, and USV: group 2 vs. other groups: more ASD-like behavioural deficits.3-CST: no differences.DSI: decreased in group 2 vs. 3. Alternative splicing pattern of ASD-relevant genes in brains of group 2 vs. 3Aabed et al. [33]PPA hamster modelAnimal model:FMT:(1) PPA + N-FMTNo FMT:(2) Control(3) PPA(4) Clindamycin(5) PPA + bee pollen(6) PPA + Propolis10 per groupFMTAnorectallyNAMore oxidative stress in brains of group 3 and 4 vs. all other groupsFigure 1
Flow diagram of included and excluded studies in the meta-analysis.


## 3.2. Quality Evaluation

The Cochrane Collaboration Network RCT risk of bias assessment tool was adopted to measure bias in the included literature [34]. This included random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, completeness of data, and selectivity. Among the five studies included in the meta-analysis, four were randomised trials and two conducted blinded trials. The quality of the five articles is presented in Figure 2. Most studies included in the review had high quality as a whole, while only one or two might be at high risk of performance bias and detection bias.Figure 2
Risk of bias assessment of included studies.


## 3.3. Forest Map Combined with ABC Scores as an Outcome Indicator

Based on the main indicators used to evaluate ASD, we identified five of them for further analysis. When using ABC scores as the outcome indicator,I2 = 0%, indicating no heterogeneity in the literature. Therefore, the results were analyzed using a fixed-effects model. The WMD with the corresponding 95% confidence (CI) demonstrated that ABC scores were significantly reduced after FMT (WMD = −14.96; 95% CI, −21.68 to −8.24; P<0.001) (Figure 3).Figure 3
Pooled estimates of ABC scores in meta-analysis.


## 3.4. Forest Map with CARS Scores as an Outcome Indicator

Based on the main indicators used to evaluate ASD, we selected four of them for further analysis. When using CARS scores as the outcome indicator,I2 = 28.1%, indicating a small heterogeneity in the literature. Therefore, a random-effects model was used to analyze the data. The WMD demonstrated that CARS scores were significantly reduced after FMT (WMD = −6.95; 95% CI, −8.76 to −5.14; P<0.001) (Figure 4).Figure 4
: Pooled estimates of CARS scores in meta-analysis.


## 3.5. Publication Bias

The outcomes of the Begg’s and Egger’s tests revealed no publication bias (PEgger = 0.175, PBegg = 0.221) (Figure 5).Figure 5
Plot of public bias. (a) Egger’s test:Y axis represents the standard normal deviate (SND) of ABC scores (effect estimate). SND is defined as the sample mean divided by the standard error. The method is to use SND to make regression analysis on the precision of effect estimation. (b) Begg’s test: Y axis represents standard error of weighted mean difference (WMD). WMD indicates the standardization of the effect estimate. The method is to use corrected rank correlation analysis to test the correlation between WMD and its standard error.
(a)(b)


## 3.6. Sensitivity Analysis

The sensitivity analysis showed that the exclusion of a study had no significant effect on the overall results. Therefore, the results were stable (Figure6).Figure 6
The plot of sensitivity analysis.


## 4. Discussion

Only a few reports focus on the use of FMT to treat ASD. In our meta-analysis, we searched for the efficacy of faecal bacteria transplantation in childhood autism. We conducted an exhaustive literature search to identify RCTs containing both human and animal publications. After screening, 5 RCT studies were selected for the meta-analysis. Our results demonstrate that FMT markedly reduced ABC scores in children with ASD (WMD = −14.96; 95% CI, −21.68 to −8.24;P<0.001). FMT also reduced CARS scores (WMD = −6.95; 95% CI, −8.76 to −5.14; P<0.001). These results indicate that FMT improves ASD. In our meta-analysis, the studies exhibited low heterogeneity (I2 = 0% and I2 = 28.1%). The sensitivity analysis showed that the results were stable.Most of the studies were conducted on patients that were first treated with FMT for ASD and then observed for several weeks and found improvements in their gastrointestinal symptoms, ASD symptoms, and microbiome [21, 23, 25]. Kang et al. went on to follow 18 patients for two years and found that most of the improvement in GI symptoms was sustained, while ASD-related symptoms improved considerably even after the end of treatment. In addition, they found ASD faecal bacterial diversity was even higher than before [22]. Chen et al. cultured the gut microbiota using an in vitro batch culture method and performed gut microbiota transplantation in a maternal immune activation-induced ASD mouse model with the primary donor microbiota and the in vitro cultured microbiota. They showed that FMT alleviated behavioural abnormalities and chemokine disorders in the ASD mouse model. In addition, a few critical unique taxa in the gut microbial composition of ASD were altered [30]. Although the observed metrics in the ASD animal experiments were not consistent with the RCTs from the population studies, the results suggest that increased gut microbiota can attenuate autism-like behaviours [30–33]. These clinical and animal studies show that FMT has a positive effect on ASD. This result is consistent with other reports on the positive effect of modulating the gut microbiota to treat anxiety disorders [35] and other psychiatric disorders [36].The underlying mechanism of FMT in ASD is still unclear. Li et al. [23] found significant changes in serum neurotransmitters in an ASD group using FMT; serotonin and gamma-aminobutyric acid declined after FMT, while dopamine levels increased. They speculated that FMT may contribute to the regulation of neurotransmitters the microbiota-gut-brain axis to modulate the central nervous system. A recent study identified changes in metabolites as a mechanism for gut-brain connections mediated by the gut microbiota and provided promising clinical evidence for autism therapies and biomarkers [37].There are several limitations to our study. First, two of the articles included in the analysis were from the same research team, which may result in a publication bias. Second, the quality of the included studies was variable. Different studies applied different randomisation processes and blinding methods. We also did not break down the effect of the choice of different colony transplantation methods on the results. Third, we did not conduct adverse effects statistics for FMT treatment of ASD. Zhao et al. [26] reported adverse events, including fever, allergies, and nausea, but all adverse events were minor and transient. Others have reported that FMT can improve GI symptoms and ASD symptoms without inducing serious complications [21–23]. Fourth, the only ASD cases included in the study were those with GI symptoms. Whereas genetic changes can also lead to ASD [38], the literature does not elaborate on the role of FMT on ASD due to genetic changes.


## 5. Conclusions

Our meta-analysis of RCTs suggests that patients with ASD can benefit from FMT, especially children with ASD who have gastrointestinal symptoms. However, there are still a small number of relevant studies, and further multicenter RCTs are needed to thoroughly assess the long-term efficacy and safety of FMT in children with ASD.



---

*Source: 5993628-2023-02-09.xml*