# Defected Circular-Cross Stub Copper Metal Printed Pentaband Antenna

Authors: Anguraj Kandasamy; Saravanakumar Rengarasu; Praveen Kitti Burri; Satheeshkumar Palanisamy; K. Kavin Kumar; Aruna Devi Baladhandapani; Samson Alemayehu Mamo
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

A pentaband antenna is presented based on the conducting copper material printed on an FR4 substrate for the applications operating in the Gigahertz frequencies. The antenna has a substrate material with a dielectric constant of 4.4. The conducting copper is printed on the FR4 substrate acting as the radiating element and ground. The antenna radiating element has a defected circular structure with a cross stub. The proposed structure is operating at 2.64 GHz, 4.87 GHz, 7.86 GHz, 10.74 GHz, and 13.67 GHz. The antenna is simulated using CST software. The antenna is fabricated and validated with the measurement of return loss. The antenna simulated results like surface current distribution, gain, directivity, and radiation pattern prove that the proposed structure with its compact size is the right candidate for the GHz application.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Many applications like medical and clinical imaging, sensing, and radar application widely use the GHz spectrum. In most communication devices, the space available for the antenna is minimal. So, there is a huge requirement for compact antennas, and also the multiband requirement is another major characteristic of the communication devices. The multiband antenna [1–16] can resonate at different bands, and hence it can be replaceable by multiple antennas operating at a different frequency. The microstrip patch antenna [1, 2] is the antenna currently used in the communication and GHz application due to its low profile. Another advantage is that it is the desirable antenna for multiband applications. There is a variety of techniques incorporated in the patch antenna to achieve multiband techniques. The techniques [3] include meandering of edges, parasitic patch elements, stacking of patches, a slot in the ground plane, and circular radiating elements [9–12]. However, all these make the structure complex, and it affects the antenna’s performance. The metamaterial is the technique that researchers widely accept nowadays to achieve multiband characteristics.Metamaterials [4, 5, 7, 11, 17–25] are artificial man-made structures that create a negative refractive index, improving antenna performance. The metamaterials are widely used in microstrip patch antennas to enhance gain and directivity, tune radiation characteristics, and achieve multiband [5, 6] characteristics. The metamaterial is an artificial man-made structure with this property due to its periodic structure and not because of the chemical combinations available in the material. There are various types of metamaterial [26, 27] structures like split [28–34] and complementary split-ring resonators, anisotropic SRR-CSRR, broadside SRR-CSRR, omega, S, and Eight-shaped resonators.This paper presents the defective circular antenna with cross stub for wireless application. In Section2, the construction of the proposed structure is presented, and in Section 3, the parametric analysis is presented. In Section 4, the result is discussed, and the conclusion is presented in Section 5.


## 2. C-Shaped Antenna with Cross Stub

In Figure1, the step by step design procedure of the proposed C-shaped antenna with cross stub is presented. Figure 2 shows that the final proposed C-shaped antenna and its parameters are depicted, and the final parameter values are presented in Table 1.Figure 1
Step by step design of the C-shaped antenna with stub.Figure 2
Pentaband cross stub circular monopole antenna.Table 1
Parameter value in mm.
wlLgAbwg303288230wflfr1Rht2107.74101.60.035Antenna A is a simple circular patch antenna with a radius of 10 mm, which resonates at a single band with an impedance bandwidth of 0.48 GHz. The resonant frequency of antenna A is 4.23 GHz. Then, antenna B is designed by including a circular slot of 7.74 mm, which is operating at dual-band at 4.21 GHz and 2.31 GHz. Antenna C is designed to create a slot in the circular radiating ring, and a cross-shaped stub is introduced, making the proposed C-shaped antenna with cross stub to operate at 4 different bands at 2.45, 4.51, 8.03, and 13.82 GHz. The resonating band of the antenna is from 2.12 GHz to 3.61 GHz with the return loss of −11.85 dB, from 3.98 GHz to 5.59 GHz with a return loss of −13.67 dB, from 7.12 GHz to 10.24 GHz with a return loss of −17.12 dB, and from 13.5 GHz to 14.32 GHz, with a return loss of −12.08 dB. The antenna’s impedance bandwidth is 1.49 GHz, 1.61 GHz, 3.12 GHz, and 0.76 GHz in the respective bands. The proposed antenna’s reflection coefficients are presented in Figure3, from which we can observe that the proposed antenna has quad-band GHz resonance. In Figure 4, the comparison between the three evolution stages is presented.Figure 3
S11 simulated plot for pentaband cross stub circular monopole antenna.Figure 4
S11 comparision plot-various stages of pentaband cross stub circular monopole antenna.


## 3. Parametric Analysis of C-Shaped Antenna

The parametric analysis in CST identifies the correct value for the critical parameters. First, the slot radiusr1 is chosen. It is varied from 7.74 mm to 9.74 mm in steps of 1 mm. The analysis of return loss concerning various slot radii is presented in Figure 4 (r1 = 7.74 mm is represented in red, r1 = 8.74 mm is represented green, and r1 = 9.74 mm is represented in blue). Figure 5 shows that as the slot’s radius increases, the impedance bandwidth is very much reduced, and therefore 7.74 mm is chosen as the final value.Figure 5
Parametric analysis-radius of the ring slotr1.Then, the feed width is chosen for the parametric analysis, and it increased from 1 mm to 3 mm in steps of 1 mm. The feed width of 2 mm has good impedance matching and bandwidth in all the operating bands. Hence, it is chosen as the final value for the proposed C-shaped cross stub antenna. The effect of the feed with is presented in Figure6 (wf = 1 mm is represented by pick colour, wf = 2 mm is represented by red colour, and wf = 3 mm is represented by orange colour) and followed by the ground length lg, which is changed from 6 mm to 8 mm in steps of 1 mm. And, it is noted that lg = 8 mm has good resonance behaviour in all the resonating bands, which is depicted in Figure 7 (lg = 6 mm is represented in yellow, lg = 7 mm is represented in red, and lg = 8 mm is represented in blue).Figure 6
Parametric analysis-feed width wf.Figure 7
Parametric analysis-ground length lg.


## 4. Result and Discussion

In Figure8, the radiation pattern concerning various resonating frequencies is presented. From Figure 8, it is observed that the E plane has a perfect dipole pattern while the H plane has an omnidirectional pattern. The dipole and omnidirectional patterns are major requirements for any communication application.Figure 8
Radiation pattern at various resonating frequencies: (a) 2.64 GHz. (b) 4.87 GHz. (c) 7.86 GHz. (d) 10.74 GHz. (e) 13.67 GHz.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)In Figure9, the surface current density at various resonating frequencies is presented, which depicts that the surface current is distributed evenly in the proposed structure over the entire operating frequency.Figure 9
Distribution of surface current at various resonating frequencies: (a) 2.64 GHz. (b) 4.87 GHz. (c) 7.86 GHz. (d) 10.74 GHz. (e) 13.67 GHz.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)In Figure10, the directivity is plotted for the resonant frequency; the maximum directivity is about 7.25 dBi. The directivity is above 2.5 dBi in all the resonating bands. The gain is also plotted with respect to the frequency in Figure 11. The maximum value of the gain is 6.25 dBi.Figure 10
Directivity vs. frequency plot.Figure 11
Gain vs. frequency plot.The proposed antenna is fabricated with the help of the photolithography method. The mask of the proposed antenna is placed on the FR4; before that the FR4 should be cleaned with the help of acetone. The substrate to be used should be double-side copper-clad FR4. Then, the Cu clad FR4 is UV exposed and immersed in NaCl developer solution. Then, etch could be done with FeCl followed by a photoresist removal. The fabricated antenna with respect to the above procedure is presented in Figure12. The proposed antenna is measured and compared with the simulated results in Figure 13. The deviation is due to the fabrication and measurement error.Figure 12
Fabricated antenna.Figure 13
Simulated vs. measuredS11 Plot.In Figure7, the directivity is plotted for the resonant frequency; the maximum directivity is about 7.25 dBi. The directivity is above 2.5 dBi in all the resonating bands. The gain is also plotted with respect to the frequency in Figure 8. The maximum value of the gain is 6.25 dBi.


## 5. Conclusion

A printed C-shaped patch with a cross stub is presented for the GHz application. The proposed structure has three stages of evolution. It is designed on an FR4 substrate with 30 mm × 32 mm × 1.6 mm. The antenna operates at 4 different bands at 2.45 GHz, 4.51 GHz, 8.03 GHz, and 13.82 GHz. The resonating band of the antenna is from 2.12 GHz to 3.61 GHz with the return loss of −11.85 dB, from 3.98 GHz to 5.59 GHz with a return loss of −13.67 dB, from 7.12 GHz to 10.24 GHz with a return loss of −17.12 dB, and from 13.5 GHz to 14.32 GHz, with a return loss of −12.08 dB. The antenna’s impedance bandwidth is 1.49 GHz, 1.61 GHz, 3.12 GHz, and 0.76 GHz in the respective bands. The simulated result of the return loss, gain, directivity, E plane, and H plane radiation pattern is presented. The compact size, reasonable gain, and directivity with stable E plane and H plane radiation pattern make the proposed antenna to be the best choice for the proposed GHz application.



---

*Source: 6009092-2022-05-19.xml*