# Long-Term Wind Characteristics at Selected Locations in Mauritius for Power Generation

Authors: A. Z. Dhunny; M. R. Lollchund; S. D. D. V. Rughooputh
Journal: Journal of Wind Energy
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

Interests in wind energy have gained impetus in many developed and developing countries worldwide during the last three decades. This is due to awareness of the population about the depletion of fossil fuels as well as Government campaigns and initiatives to encourage the use of renewable sources of energy. This work focuses on the wind energy potential at two selected locations (Plaisance and Vacoas) in Mauritius. The emphasis is to assess whether small-wind turbines have a potential in these regions for generation of power for domestic applications. Such wind turbines can range in size from 400 W to 10 kW depending on the amount of electricity to be generated. The assessment is based on the correlation of the local wind speed data to a two-parameter Weibull probability distribution in order to effectively estimate the average wind power density of the sites. Nearly 40 years of mean wind speed data is utilized. Of the two sites investigated it is found that Plaisance yielded the highest wind velocity (as compared to Vacoas). The study also estimates the energy output of six commercial small-wind turbines of capacity ranging from 1 kW to 3 kW at these two sites, placed at multiple heights.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Mauritius is an island situated in the southwest region of the Indian Ocean. Its mainland covers an area of 1865 km2 and it has a coastline of 330 km. Mauritius has a population of around 1.27 million inhabitants and a growth rate of 1% per annum [1]. The Central Electricity Board (CEB) which is the sole distributor of power for the consumers is having difficulty in coping with the high demand [2]. A forecasting has shown that the energy demand keeps on growing at around 5% annually. Therefore, to delve into other sources of economic and more importantly clean energy is becoming a necessity for the CEB. Two wind farm projects which are currently under constructions are expected to contribute 77 GWh of energy while an additional 16 GWh is also envisaged from a solar photovoltaic (PV) farm project. The Government’s Maurice Ile Durable (MID) initiative [3], along with promotional incentives for renewable energy projects, is greatly encouraging the adoption of small-scale power generators, such as PV and small-wind turbines, in individual households for their domestic use. This category of electricity consumers represents around 30% of the demand [2]. Installation of small-wind turbines by individuals is more popular compared to PV cells due to the relatively low installation and maintenance costs [4]. This work focuses on the assessment of wind resource at two selected sites (Plaisance and Vacoas) in Mauritius (see Figure 1). The objective is to evaluate the potential of small-wind turbines which operate with wind speed in the range of 3.0 to 20 m/s and which can generate between 1.5 and 2.5 MWh of yearly electrical power [5]. According to the CEB, the average specific consumption of a typical household in Mauritius is around 2 MWh per year [2]. Hence, depending on the average wind speed in the area, a wind turbine rated in the range of 1 kW to 10 kW coulda priori make a significant contribution to this demand. To the author’s knowledge no study has been performed to assess the wind potential in localized urban regions in Mauritius for the placement of such rated small-wind turbines.Figure 1
A map of the main island of Mauritius showing the locations of Vacoas and Plaisance and their respective elevations above sea level.The assessment of wind energy potential of a region requires long-term data related to the wind speed and an accurate determination of its distribution. The variations in wind speed can be characterized by two functions which are the probability density function (PDF) and the corresponding cumulative density function (CDF). Dhunny et al. [6] have tested long-term wind speed data at Plaisance and Vacoas with seven standard statistical distributions, Burr, Weibull, Lognormal, Normal, Rayleigh, Gamma, and Frechet, and concluded that wind speed data at both locations were more significantly represented by the Weibull and Burr distributions according to the goodness of fit tests. For the study presented in this paper, the Weibull distribution will be solely considered due to its great flexibility and simplicity in the computation of wind power [7]. It is worthwhile to mention that the Weibull PDF has also been employed in the analysis of the wind energy potential for different regions in countries such as Tunisia [8], Eastern Mediterranean [9], Nigeria [10], Turkey [11], Iran [12], Columbia [13], and coastal areas of Jiwani, Pakistan [14]. It is also important to get an estimate of the expected annual energy output of some typical small commercial wind turbines as a function of the annual average wind speed. The authors believe that this information will be helpful to the Government and any relevant organization in making an informed decision with regard to investment in wind energy resource for domestic use at these two mentioned sites in Mauritius.


## 2. Theoretical Background

### 2.1. Weibull Probability Distribution of Wind Speed

The Weibull probability density function (WPDF),f(v), for the wind data indicates the probability that the wind will blow at a given speed v. It is a two-parameter distribution which can be expressed as(1)fv=kcvck-1exp⁡-vck,where c is the Weibull scale parameter (the same dimension as v) which basically indicates the wind regime at a certain location and k is a dimensionless Weibull shape parameter [15]. The cumulative distribution function F(v), which is the integral of f(v) in the range of (0,v), is expressed as(2)Fv=1-exp-vck.The mean and variance are, respectively, represented as(3)v¯=Ev=cΓ1+1k,Var⁡v=c2Γ1+2k-Γ21+1k,where Γ is the Gamma function.To estimate the parametersk and c for a given set of measured velocity data, numerous methods have been proposed in the literature [16]. In this work, the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) was employed. The MLE of a variable, say, x, in a given function g(x) is defined as the value of x that maximizes the likelihood of g(x) or, equivalently, the logarithm of the likelihood g(x). This reduces the occurrence of an important number of unlikely outcomes for x. The likelihood function for the WPDF is the joint density of n random variables, say, v1,v2,v3,…,vn, and is given by(4)Zv1,v2,…,vn,k,c=∏i=1nkcvick-1exp⁡-vick.On taking the logarithm of (4), differentiating with respect to k and c in turn and performing some simplifications we obtain the estimating equation(5)∑i=1nvikln⁡vi∑i=1nvik-1k-1n∑i=1nln⁡vi=0.Parameterk of the Weibull distribution is easily obtained when solving (5) by the use of a standard iterative method such as the Newton-Raphson technique. Once k is computed, c can be estimated using(6)c=1n∑i=1nvik.


### 2.2. Wind Speed Variation with Height

Wind speed data are normally measured at a certain height and, in most cases, the wind turbine hub is placed at a different height. In order to adjust the measured wind speed data to the level of the wind turbine hub, the power law is the most common expression accepted in the literature [17]. This law describes the vertical variation of wind speed and is formulated as(7)vh=v0hh0α,where v(h) is the wind speed at the hub height h, v0 is the wind speed at measured height h0, and α is the surface roughness coefficient. The value for α varies from 0.1 over the tops of steep hills to 0.25 in sheltered locations. For flat coastal regions, α is taken as 0.143 (1/7) which is the typical value used in most research works [18]. According to Ucar and Balo [11] and Oyedepo et al. [19], the value of α for a particular wind condition can in general be computed from the empirical expression(8)α=0.37-0.088ln⁡v01-0.088ln⁡h0/10.As the wind velocity varies with height, it is evident that the Weibull parameters also are functions of hub height. Oyedepo et al. [19] provide the following expressions:(9)ch=c0hh0α,kh=k01-0.088ln⁡h0/101-0.088ln⁡h/10,where c0 and k0 are, respectively, the scale factor and shape parameter at the measured height h0.


### 2.3.  Estimation of Wind Power and Energy Output of a Wind Turbine

The wind powerPwind(v) that can be captured by a wind turbine is given by the product of the mass flow rate entering the rotor blades of the wind turbine and the kinetic energy per unit mass in the wind. It is estimated by(10)Pwindv=12ρAv3,where ρ is the mean air density (assumed to be 1.225 kg/m3 in this study) and A is the swept area of the rotor blades. Correspondingly, the average wind power density of a site, based on the WPDF, can be obtained using the expression(11)PD=12ρc3Γ1+3k.The instantaneous electrical energyW generated by a wind turbine depends on the efficiency and the instantaneous local wind speed. Ettoumi et al. [20] provide the expression(12)Wv=Pwindvgvfv,where g(v) is the efficiency of the turbine at speed v (as given by the manufacturer). The mean annual energy output of the wind turbine can then be computed using(13)Eout=Nh∫vinvoutWvdv,where Nh is the number of hours in a year and vin and vout are the cut-in and cut-off wind speeds of the turbine, respectively [13].


## 2.1. Weibull Probability Distribution of Wind Speed

The Weibull probability density function (WPDF),f(v), for the wind data indicates the probability that the wind will blow at a given speed v. It is a two-parameter distribution which can be expressed as(1)fv=kcvck-1exp⁡-vck,where c is the Weibull scale parameter (the same dimension as v) which basically indicates the wind regime at a certain location and k is a dimensionless Weibull shape parameter [15]. The cumulative distribution function F(v), which is the integral of f(v) in the range of (0,v), is expressed as(2)Fv=1-exp-vck.The mean and variance are, respectively, represented as(3)v¯=Ev=cΓ1+1k,Var⁡v=c2Γ1+2k-Γ21+1k,where Γ is the Gamma function.To estimate the parametersk and c for a given set of measured velocity data, numerous methods have been proposed in the literature [16]. In this work, the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) was employed. The MLE of a variable, say, x, in a given function g(x) is defined as the value of x that maximizes the likelihood of g(x) or, equivalently, the logarithm of the likelihood g(x). This reduces the occurrence of an important number of unlikely outcomes for x. The likelihood function for the WPDF is the joint density of n random variables, say, v1,v2,v3,…,vn, and is given by(4)Zv1,v2,…,vn,k,c=∏i=1nkcvick-1exp⁡-vick.On taking the logarithm of (4), differentiating with respect to k and c in turn and performing some simplifications we obtain the estimating equation(5)∑i=1nvikln⁡vi∑i=1nvik-1k-1n∑i=1nln⁡vi=0.Parameterk of the Weibull distribution is easily obtained when solving (5) by the use of a standard iterative method such as the Newton-Raphson technique. Once k is computed, c can be estimated using(6)c=1n∑i=1nvik.


## 2.2. Wind Speed Variation with Height

Wind speed data are normally measured at a certain height and, in most cases, the wind turbine hub is placed at a different height. In order to adjust the measured wind speed data to the level of the wind turbine hub, the power law is the most common expression accepted in the literature [17]. This law describes the vertical variation of wind speed and is formulated as(7)vh=v0hh0α,where v(h) is the wind speed at the hub height h, v0 is the wind speed at measured height h0, and α is the surface roughness coefficient. The value for α varies from 0.1 over the tops of steep hills to 0.25 in sheltered locations. For flat coastal regions, α is taken as 0.143 (1/7) which is the typical value used in most research works [18]. According to Ucar and Balo [11] and Oyedepo et al. [19], the value of α for a particular wind condition can in general be computed from the empirical expression(8)α=0.37-0.088ln⁡v01-0.088ln⁡h0/10.As the wind velocity varies with height, it is evident that the Weibull parameters also are functions of hub height. Oyedepo et al. [19] provide the following expressions:(9)ch=c0hh0α,kh=k01-0.088ln⁡h0/101-0.088ln⁡h/10,where c0 and k0 are, respectively, the scale factor and shape parameter at the measured height h0.


## 2.3.  Estimation of Wind Power and Energy Output of a Wind Turbine

The wind powerPwind(v) that can be captured by a wind turbine is given by the product of the mass flow rate entering the rotor blades of the wind turbine and the kinetic energy per unit mass in the wind. It is estimated by(10)Pwindv=12ρAv3,where ρ is the mean air density (assumed to be 1.225 kg/m3 in this study) and A is the swept area of the rotor blades. Correspondingly, the average wind power density of a site, based on the WPDF, can be obtained using the expression(11)PD=12ρc3Γ1+3k.The instantaneous electrical energyW generated by a wind turbine depends on the efficiency and the instantaneous local wind speed. Ettoumi et al. [20] provide the expression(12)Wv=Pwindvgvfv,where g(v) is the efficiency of the turbine at speed v (as given by the manufacturer). The mean annual energy output of the wind turbine can then be computed using(13)Eout=Nh∫vinvoutWvdv,where Nh is the number of hours in a year and vin and vout are the cut-in and cut-off wind speeds of the turbine, respectively [13].


## 3. Sites Location and Wind Data

The main island of Mauritius spans around 60 km in length and 45 km in width and is located in the southwest tropical region of the Indian Ocean. Being of volcanic origin, its topography consists of a central plateau which is about 500 meters above sea level and gradually rising towards the southwest where it reaches its highest point at about 700 meters above sea level. This plateau is surrounded by a chain of mountains and some isolated peaks. Urban areas are mostly concentrated on the central plateau and coastal regions. The island of Mauritius enjoys a mild tropical maritime climate throughout the year. The meteorological conditions along the coasts are practically the same but cooler over the central plateau [1]. Table 1 displays the altitudes above sea level and geographical coordinates for both regions, and Figure 1 depicts their location in the island.Table 1
The geographical coordinates and altitudes for each site.
Site
Plaisance
Vacoas
Location
Southeast coast
Central plateau
Longitude
57° 40′E
57° 29′E
Latitude
20° 25′S
20° 17′S
Altitude above sea level
55 m
425 mThe Mauritius Meteorological Services (MMS) is the authorized Government organization for all meteorological activities in the island. Its endeavor is to provide accurate and timely weather information and meteorological products for the general welfare of the citizens and is also the Early Warning Center for natural disasters affecting the Republic of Mauritius. The MMS maintains a network of surface synoptic stations, agrometeorological and upper air stations which are fairly well distributed over the island. It has in its database, stored at the Utah Data Climate Center, over 40 years of mean wind speed data records which were measured at a height of 10 m above ground level. The prevailing trade winds over the island blow predominantly from the east with an average speed of ~5 m/s. Occasionally, during the peak winter months of July and August, with the passage of strong anticyclones, wind gusts are likely to reach 25 m/s in some exposed areas [21].This study utilizes the wind data for the two selected sites. Data obtained for Vacoas is from 1 July 1977 to 30 July 2013, while data for Plaisance is from 1 January 1973 to 30 July 2013. The AWS [22] wind resource assessment handbook was used as a guide for qualitative data filtering; the data were checked thoroughly for homogeneity, outliers, and missing records before being processed for the study. Errors and missing data as well as cyclonic winds (wind exceeding 40 m/s), according to the Beaufort Wind Scale table [23], were eliminated. These represent 2% of the complete dataset. The time-series plots of the filtered data and corresponding wind roses are, respectively, displayed in Figures 2 and 3. The whole dataset for both stations is statistically described in Table 2. It can be observed that the mean value of the wind speed is higher for Plaisance than for Vacoas. The Standard Deviation (SD), which describes by how much the data differ from the mean, is nearly the same for both stations.Table 2
Statistical description of wind data for Plaisance and Vacoas.
Statistics
Estimates (m/s)
Plaisance
Vacoas
Mean (v-)
4.05
3.57
Standard Deviation (SD)
1.79
1.61
Minimum value (vmin)
0.07
0.08
Maximum value (vmax)
30.40
37.60Figure 2
Daily mean wind data at Vacoas at 10 m above ground level from 1 June 1977 to 31 July 2013.
(a)
Wind time series
(b)
Wind roseFigure 3
Daily mean wind data at Plaisance at 10 m above ground level from 1 June 1973 to 31 July 2013.
(a)
Wind time series
(b)
Wind rose


## 4. Results and Discussion

The methodology discussed in Section2 is applied to the wind data described in Section 3. It should be mentioned that wind speeds greater than 15 m/s are truncated to remove the effects of wind gusts in the analysis. The focus is to study wind power on a normal day. This maximum allowed the value of wind speed to be based on the cut-off speed of most small-wind turbines.


### 4.1. Monthly Probability Density of Wind Speeds

The probability distribution of wind speed is needed in evaluating the potential of wind power at different sites. Hence the selection of appropriate wind turbines can be made to obtain optimum results. Figures4 and 5 show the monthly histograms of recorded wind speeds along with the fitted Weibull wind speed distributions. The mean wind speed value is also displayed in each case. The observed frequency rises steadily reaching a maximum value for wind speed between 3 and 4 m/s, and then it drops gradually. The Weibull curves peak near the mean value of the velocity. The similarity of both trends shows a good representation given by the Weibull model when compared to the actual data. Plaisance, which is near the sea, benefits more from wind presence at a velocity higher than that of Vacoas which is on the mainland. It can be observed for both locations that the winter months, April to September, yield higher wind speeds than the summer months. It should be noted that, year round, the island is influenced by the southeast trade winds. This is strengthened during the winter period when the Arctic oscillation is in its warm phase and the trade winds reach their highest value as compared to the summer period. Hence the wind speeds tend to increase during the winter period.Figure 4
Weibull distribution curves fitted to wind speed data at Plaisance at 10 m above ground level, from January to December (1973–2013). The mean value for the data is also displayed.
(a)
January (v¯=3.90 m/s)
(b)
February (v¯=3.99 m/s)
(c)
March (v¯=3.73 m/s)
(d)
April (v¯=3.37 m/s)
(e)
May (v¯=3.81 m/s)
(f)
June (v¯=4.18 m/s)
(g)
July (v¯=4.59 m/s)
(h)
August (v¯=4.70 m/s)
(i)
September (v¯=4.45 m/s)
(j)
October (v¯=4.33 m/s)
(k)
November (v¯=3.94 m/s)
(l)
December (v¯=3.86 m/s)Figure 5
Weibull distribution curves fitted to wind speed data at Vacoas at 10 m above ground level, from January to December (1977–2013). The mean value for the data is also displayed.
(a)
January (v¯=3.41 m/s)
(b)
February (v¯=3.44 m/s)
(c)
March (v¯=3.45 m/s)
(d)
April (v¯=3.46 m/s)
(e)
May (v¯=3.27 m/s)
(f)
June (v¯=3.55 m/s)
(g)
July (v¯=3.95 m/s)
(h)
August (v¯=4.01 m/s)
(i)
September (v¯=3.70 m/s)
(j)
October (v¯=3.62 m/s)
(k)
November (v¯=3.28 m/s)
(l)
December (v¯=3.26 m/s)Tables3 and 4 show the monthly variation of the Weibull parameters for Plaisance and Vacoas, at a height of 10 m above ground level, for each ten-year period from 1973 to 2013 for Plaisance and 1977 to 2013 for Vacoas. It can be observed that, for Vacoas, the Weibull scale parameter c varies between 3.45 m/s and 5.02 m/s while for Plaisance it varies between 4.48 m/s and 5.45 m/s. The shape parameter k for Vacoas varies between 1.45 and 2.86, and for Plaisance it varies between 1.86 and 3.71. For Plaisance the lowest value of k is in the month of February (1973–2013) and for Vacoas, it is lowest in January (1977–1986). For both locations the highest value of k is found in July (1973–2013 for Plaisance and 1977–1986 for Vacoas). The lowest value of c at Plaisance is found in April (1973–2013) and for Vacoas it is in December (1997–2006). The highest value of c is found in both July and August (1973–2013) for Plaisance and in July (1977–1986) for Vacoas.Table 3
Weibull parameters for monthly wind data at Plaisance at 10 m above ground level.
Months
Parameters
1973–1982
1983–1992
1993–2002
2003–2013
1973–2013
January
k (—)
2.11
2.12
2.43
2.08
2.04
c (m/s)
4.75
4.93
4.92
4.70
4.66
February
k (—)
2.00
2.17
2.42
2.11
1.86
c (m/s)
4.68
4.85
4.96
4.73
4.80
March
k (—)
2.07
2.30
2.40
2.15
2.11
c (m/s)
4.68
4.78
4.97
4.86
4.51
April
k (—)
1.90
2.26
2.50
2.17
2.16
c (m/s)
4.69
4.78
5.03
4.75
4.48
May
k (—)
2.14
2.23
2.42
2.20
2.14
c (m/s)
4.90
4.83
4.90
4.77
4.52
June
k (—)
1.98
2.24
2.50
2.30
2.32
c (m/s)
4.88
4.88
4.85
4.77
4.94
July
k (—)
2.02
2.36
2.44
2.20
3.71
c (m/s)
4.86
4.79
4.92
4.81
5.45
August
k (—)
2.18
2.38
2.25
2.14
2.59
c (m/s)
4.95
4.79
5.09
4.79
5.45
September
k (—)
2.16
2.43
2.49
2.14
2.46
c (m/s)
5.05
4.78
5.08
4.79
5.19
October
k (—)
2.23
2.25
2.46
2.14
2.61
c (m/s)
4.85
4.75
4.99
4.86
5.05
November
k (—)
1.97
2.27
2.43
2.13
2.68
c (m/s)
4.64
4.72
4.94
4.89
4.66
December
k (—)
2.05
2.36
2.52
2.04
2.30
c (m/s)
4.64
4.98
4.97
4.87
4.59Table 4
Weibull parameters for monthly wind data at Vacoas at 10 m above ground level.
Months
Parameters
1977–1986
1987–1996
1997–2006
2007–2013
1977–2013
January
k (—)
1.45
2.13
2.05
2.43
2.19
c (m/s)
3.84
4.05
4.15
3.93
4.04
February
k (—)
1.55
1.87
2.25
1.89
2.04
c (m/s)
4.12
4.01
4.36
4.02
4.20
March
k (—)
2.18
2.27
2.22
2.31
2.32
c (m/s)
4.36
4.23
3.98
4.05
4.08
April
k (—)
1.92
2.28
2.19
2.47
2.30
c (m/s)
3.83
4.34
4.04
3.98
4.09
May
k (—)
2.61
2.37
1.91
2.13
2.21
c (m/s)
4.70
4.12
3.88
3.79
4.00
June
k (—)
2.85
2.22
2.17
2.46
2.33
c (m/s)
4.68
4.20
4.12
4.09
4.20
July
k (—)
2.86
2.42
2.68
2.53
2.45
c (m/s)
5.02
4.39
4.62
4.43
4.40
August
k (—)
2.50
2.46
2.60
2.82
2.39
c (m/s)
5.00
4.68
4.71
4.41
4.39
September
k (—)
2.50
2.24
2.36
2.67
2.39
c (m/s)
4.98
4.18
4.02
4.43
4.39
October
k (—)
2.21
2.40
2.28
2.73
2.38
c (m/s)
4.31
4.33
3.93
4.21
4.18
November
k (—)
2.14
2.09
2.15
2.60
2.29
c (m/s)
4.32
3.95
3.68
3.92
3.90
December
k (—)
2.40
1.96
1.91
2.69
2.27
c (m/s)
4.50
3.85
3.45
4.05
4.00Figure6 displays the monthly variations of average power density at both locations. It can be observed that, throughout the whole year, the average power density for Plaisance varies between 50 W/m2 and 90 W/m2, with the peak in August (1973–2013). It is also noted that, for Vacoas, the average power density varies between 30 W/m2 and 70 W/m2 with peaks observed in January, February, July, August, and September (1977–1986). In general, the mean power density is higher in the winter season (April to September) and lower in summer (October to March).Figure 6
Plot of monthly variations in wind power densities at 10 m above ground level.
(a)
Plaisance
(b)
Vacoas


### 4.2. Mean Wind Power Density for the Period 2003 to 2013

Table5 displays the shape and scale parameter of Weibull at Plaisance and Vacoas for the period 2003 to 2013. At Plaisance the k parameter varies from 1.97 to 2.44 while for Vacoas it varies between 2.17 and 2.80. The scale parameter at Plaisance varies between 4.25 m/s and 5.26 m/s and between 3.82 m/s and 4.37 m/s at Vacoas. Figure 7 displays the variations of average wind power density for the period of 2003–2013. In general, the wind power density for Vacoas varies between 30 W/m2 and 50 W/m2. For Plaisance it varies between 50 W/m2 and 90 W/m2. Year 2007 has yielded the maximum power at 90 W/m2 at a 10 m height and the lowest recorded power was found at 52 W/m2 in 2004. Additionally, it was noted that the year 2003 yielded a maximum power density of 50 W/m2 while the years 2010 and 2011 recorded the lowest power density which was at around 32 W/m2.Table 5
Weibull parameters for yearly wind data at Plaisance and Vacoas at 10 m above ground level.
Year
Parameter
Plaisance
Vacoas
2003
k (—)
2.19
2.24
c (m/s)
4.45
4.37
2004
k (—)
2.32
2.50
c (m/s)
4.41
4.21
2005
k (—)
2.10
2.44
c (m/s)
4.71
4.07
2006
k (—)
2.44
2.40
c (m/s)
5.10
4.36
2007
k (—)
2.14
2.19
c (m/s)
5.26
4.16
2008
k (—)
2.18
2.42
c (m/s)
5.02
4.16
2009
k (—)
2.05
2.51
c (m/s)
4.84
4.07
2010
k (—)
2.17
2.59
c (m/s)
4.77
3.85
2011
k (—)
2.00
2.51
c (m/s)
4.25
3.82
2012
k (—)
2.30
2.80
c (m/s)
5.07
4.19
2013
k (—)
1.97
2.17
c (m/s)
4.71
3.88Figure 7
Yearly variations in wind power densities at Plaisance and Vacoas at 10 m above ground level, from 2003 to 2013.


### 4.3. Performance of Some Small-Wind Turbines

To have an estimate of the performance of wind turbines at Vacoas and Plaisance, six small commercial wind turbines were selected. These turbines were considered owing to their good performance and reasonable cost. The characteristic properties of these wind turbines are listed in Table6 and Figure 8 displays the power of turbine versus wind speed as given by the manufacturer in the turbine’s manual. The propeller axis for the Exmok 1.5 kW wind turbine is horizontal while it is vertical for the remaining wind turbines.Table 6
Main characteristics of six small commercial wind turbines.
Characteristics
Aeolos
Eddy GT
Exmok
SRM
WindSpot
Rated power (kW)
1
3
1
1.5
3
1.5
Hub height (m)
9
9
12
12
12
12
Swept area (m2)
8.1
19.6
4.62
8.1
12.6
8.9
Cut-in wind speed (m/s),Vin
3
3
3.5
2.5
3
3
Cut-off wind speed (m/s),Vout
25
25
20
17
20
20
Rated wind speed (m/s)
10
10
12
9
10
12Figure 8
Power curve of six commercial wind turbines operating in the range from 1 to 3 kW.The energy output for the year 2013 was analyzed in this case for both sites. Figure9 displays the yearly wind energy output by the six wind generators at different heights at Plaisance and Vacoas. The power values for hub heights above 10 m were computed after extrapolating the Weibull parameters using (9). It is noted that the diagrams have the same general shape but differ from each site owing to the type of wind influencing the regions under study. At 10 m above ground level the yearly energy production from the bigger wind generators is relatively weak as it lies below 15000 kWh/year for Plaisance and less than 1000 kWh/year for Vacoas (Figure 9). The energy output increases by nearly 15% for the bigger generators on increasing hub height to a 40 m height at both locations.Figure 9
Yearly wind energy output of the six wind turbines at different heights above ground level.
(a)
Plaisance
(b)
Vacoas


## 4.1. Monthly Probability Density of Wind Speeds

The probability distribution of wind speed is needed in evaluating the potential of wind power at different sites. Hence the selection of appropriate wind turbines can be made to obtain optimum results. Figures4 and 5 show the monthly histograms of recorded wind speeds along with the fitted Weibull wind speed distributions. The mean wind speed value is also displayed in each case. The observed frequency rises steadily reaching a maximum value for wind speed between 3 and 4 m/s, and then it drops gradually. The Weibull curves peak near the mean value of the velocity. The similarity of both trends shows a good representation given by the Weibull model when compared to the actual data. Plaisance, which is near the sea, benefits more from wind presence at a velocity higher than that of Vacoas which is on the mainland. It can be observed for both locations that the winter months, April to September, yield higher wind speeds than the summer months. It should be noted that, year round, the island is influenced by the southeast trade winds. This is strengthened during the winter period when the Arctic oscillation is in its warm phase and the trade winds reach their highest value as compared to the summer period. Hence the wind speeds tend to increase during the winter period.Figure 4
Weibull distribution curves fitted to wind speed data at Plaisance at 10 m above ground level, from January to December (1973–2013). The mean value for the data is also displayed.
(a)
January (v¯=3.90 m/s)
(b)
February (v¯=3.99 m/s)
(c)
March (v¯=3.73 m/s)
(d)
April (v¯=3.37 m/s)
(e)
May (v¯=3.81 m/s)
(f)
June (v¯=4.18 m/s)
(g)
July (v¯=4.59 m/s)
(h)
August (v¯=4.70 m/s)
(i)
September (v¯=4.45 m/s)
(j)
October (v¯=4.33 m/s)
(k)
November (v¯=3.94 m/s)
(l)
December (v¯=3.86 m/s)Figure 5
Weibull distribution curves fitted to wind speed data at Vacoas at 10 m above ground level, from January to December (1977–2013). The mean value for the data is also displayed.
(a)
January (v¯=3.41 m/s)
(b)
February (v¯=3.44 m/s)
(c)
March (v¯=3.45 m/s)
(d)
April (v¯=3.46 m/s)
(e)
May (v¯=3.27 m/s)
(f)
June (v¯=3.55 m/s)
(g)
July (v¯=3.95 m/s)
(h)
August (v¯=4.01 m/s)
(i)
September (v¯=3.70 m/s)
(j)
October (v¯=3.62 m/s)
(k)
November (v¯=3.28 m/s)
(l)
December (v¯=3.26 m/s)Tables3 and 4 show the monthly variation of the Weibull parameters for Plaisance and Vacoas, at a height of 10 m above ground level, for each ten-year period from 1973 to 2013 for Plaisance and 1977 to 2013 for Vacoas. It can be observed that, for Vacoas, the Weibull scale parameter c varies between 3.45 m/s and 5.02 m/s while for Plaisance it varies between 4.48 m/s and 5.45 m/s. The shape parameter k for Vacoas varies between 1.45 and 2.86, and for Plaisance it varies between 1.86 and 3.71. For Plaisance the lowest value of k is in the month of February (1973–2013) and for Vacoas, it is lowest in January (1977–1986). For both locations the highest value of k is found in July (1973–2013 for Plaisance and 1977–1986 for Vacoas). The lowest value of c at Plaisance is found in April (1973–2013) and for Vacoas it is in December (1997–2006). The highest value of c is found in both July and August (1973–2013) for Plaisance and in July (1977–1986) for Vacoas.Table 3
Weibull parameters for monthly wind data at Plaisance at 10 m above ground level.
Months
Parameters
1973–1982
1983–1992
1993–2002
2003–2013
1973–2013
January
k (—)
2.11
2.12
2.43
2.08
2.04
c (m/s)
4.75
4.93
4.92
4.70
4.66
February
k (—)
2.00
2.17
2.42
2.11
1.86
c (m/s)
4.68
4.85
4.96
4.73
4.80
March
k (—)
2.07
2.30
2.40
2.15
2.11
c (m/s)
4.68
4.78
4.97
4.86
4.51
April
k (—)
1.90
2.26
2.50
2.17
2.16
c (m/s)
4.69
4.78
5.03
4.75
4.48
May
k (—)
2.14
2.23
2.42
2.20
2.14
c (m/s)
4.90
4.83
4.90
4.77
4.52
June
k (—)
1.98
2.24
2.50
2.30
2.32
c (m/s)
4.88
4.88
4.85
4.77
4.94
July
k (—)
2.02
2.36
2.44
2.20
3.71
c (m/s)
4.86
4.79
4.92
4.81
5.45
August
k (—)
2.18
2.38
2.25
2.14
2.59
c (m/s)
4.95
4.79
5.09
4.79
5.45
September
k (—)
2.16
2.43
2.49
2.14
2.46
c (m/s)
5.05
4.78
5.08
4.79
5.19
October
k (—)
2.23
2.25
2.46
2.14
2.61
c (m/s)
4.85
4.75
4.99
4.86
5.05
November
k (—)
1.97
2.27
2.43
2.13
2.68
c (m/s)
4.64
4.72
4.94
4.89
4.66
December
k (—)
2.05
2.36
2.52
2.04
2.30
c (m/s)
4.64
4.98
4.97
4.87
4.59Table 4
Weibull parameters for monthly wind data at Vacoas at 10 m above ground level.
Months
Parameters
1977–1986
1987–1996
1997–2006
2007–2013
1977–2013
January
k (—)
1.45
2.13
2.05
2.43
2.19
c (m/s)
3.84
4.05
4.15
3.93
4.04
February
k (—)
1.55
1.87
2.25
1.89
2.04
c (m/s)
4.12
4.01
4.36
4.02
4.20
March
k (—)
2.18
2.27
2.22
2.31
2.32
c (m/s)
4.36
4.23
3.98
4.05
4.08
April
k (—)
1.92
2.28
2.19
2.47
2.30
c (m/s)
3.83
4.34
4.04
3.98
4.09
May
k (—)
2.61
2.37
1.91
2.13
2.21
c (m/s)
4.70
4.12
3.88
3.79
4.00
June
k (—)
2.85
2.22
2.17
2.46
2.33
c (m/s)
4.68
4.20
4.12
4.09
4.20
July
k (—)
2.86
2.42
2.68
2.53
2.45
c (m/s)
5.02
4.39
4.62
4.43
4.40
August
k (—)
2.50
2.46
2.60
2.82
2.39
c (m/s)
5.00
4.68
4.71
4.41
4.39
September
k (—)
2.50
2.24
2.36
2.67
2.39
c (m/s)
4.98
4.18
4.02
4.43
4.39
October
k (—)
2.21
2.40
2.28
2.73
2.38
c (m/s)
4.31
4.33
3.93
4.21
4.18
November
k (—)
2.14
2.09
2.15
2.60
2.29
c (m/s)
4.32
3.95
3.68
3.92
3.90
December
k (—)
2.40
1.96
1.91
2.69
2.27
c (m/s)
4.50
3.85
3.45
4.05
4.00Figure6 displays the monthly variations of average power density at both locations. It can be observed that, throughout the whole year, the average power density for Plaisance varies between 50 W/m2 and 90 W/m2, with the peak in August (1973–2013). It is also noted that, for Vacoas, the average power density varies between 30 W/m2 and 70 W/m2 with peaks observed in January, February, July, August, and September (1977–1986). In general, the mean power density is higher in the winter season (April to September) and lower in summer (October to March).Figure 6
Plot of monthly variations in wind power densities at 10 m above ground level.
(a)
Plaisance
(b)
Vacoas


## 4.2. Mean Wind Power Density for the Period 2003 to 2013

Table5 displays the shape and scale parameter of Weibull at Plaisance and Vacoas for the period 2003 to 2013. At Plaisance the k parameter varies from 1.97 to 2.44 while for Vacoas it varies between 2.17 and 2.80. The scale parameter at Plaisance varies between 4.25 m/s and 5.26 m/s and between 3.82 m/s and 4.37 m/s at Vacoas. Figure 7 displays the variations of average wind power density for the period of 2003–2013. In general, the wind power density for Vacoas varies between 30 W/m2 and 50 W/m2. For Plaisance it varies between 50 W/m2 and 90 W/m2. Year 2007 has yielded the maximum power at 90 W/m2 at a 10 m height and the lowest recorded power was found at 52 W/m2 in 2004. Additionally, it was noted that the year 2003 yielded a maximum power density of 50 W/m2 while the years 2010 and 2011 recorded the lowest power density which was at around 32 W/m2.Table 5
Weibull parameters for yearly wind data at Plaisance and Vacoas at 10 m above ground level.
Year
Parameter
Plaisance
Vacoas
2003
k (—)
2.19
2.24
c (m/s)
4.45
4.37
2004
k (—)
2.32
2.50
c (m/s)
4.41
4.21
2005
k (—)
2.10
2.44
c (m/s)
4.71
4.07
2006
k (—)
2.44
2.40
c (m/s)
5.10
4.36
2007
k (—)
2.14
2.19
c (m/s)
5.26
4.16
2008
k (—)
2.18
2.42
c (m/s)
5.02
4.16
2009
k (—)
2.05
2.51
c (m/s)
4.84
4.07
2010
k (—)
2.17
2.59
c (m/s)
4.77
3.85
2011
k (—)
2.00
2.51
c (m/s)
4.25
3.82
2012
k (—)
2.30
2.80
c (m/s)
5.07
4.19
2013
k (—)
1.97
2.17
c (m/s)
4.71
3.88Figure 7
Yearly variations in wind power densities at Plaisance and Vacoas at 10 m above ground level, from 2003 to 2013.


## 4.3. Performance of Some Small-Wind Turbines

To have an estimate of the performance of wind turbines at Vacoas and Plaisance, six small commercial wind turbines were selected. These turbines were considered owing to their good performance and reasonable cost. The characteristic properties of these wind turbines are listed in Table6 and Figure 8 displays the power of turbine versus wind speed as given by the manufacturer in the turbine’s manual. The propeller axis for the Exmok 1.5 kW wind turbine is horizontal while it is vertical for the remaining wind turbines.Table 6
Main characteristics of six small commercial wind turbines.
Characteristics
Aeolos
Eddy GT
Exmok
SRM
WindSpot
Rated power (kW)
1
3
1
1.5
3
1.5
Hub height (m)
9
9
12
12
12
12
Swept area (m2)
8.1
19.6
4.62
8.1
12.6
8.9
Cut-in wind speed (m/s),Vin
3
3
3.5
2.5
3
3
Cut-off wind speed (m/s),Vout
25
25
20
17
20
20
Rated wind speed (m/s)
10
10
12
9
10
12Figure 8
Power curve of six commercial wind turbines operating in the range from 1 to 3 kW.The energy output for the year 2013 was analyzed in this case for both sites. Figure9 displays the yearly wind energy output by the six wind generators at different heights at Plaisance and Vacoas. The power values for hub heights above 10 m were computed after extrapolating the Weibull parameters using (9). It is noted that the diagrams have the same general shape but differ from each site owing to the type of wind influencing the regions under study. At 10 m above ground level the yearly energy production from the bigger wind generators is relatively weak as it lies below 15000 kWh/year for Plaisance and less than 1000 kWh/year for Vacoas (Figure 9). The energy output increases by nearly 15% for the bigger generators on increasing hub height to a 40 m height at both locations.Figure 9
Yearly wind energy output of the six wind turbines at different heights above ground level.
(a)
Plaisance
(b)
Vacoas


## 5. Conclusion

In this study, the wind potential analysis was performed for two specific locations in Mauritius: Plaisance and Vacoas. The MLE method was employed to compute the Weibullk and c parameters that describe the wind speed data. A good correlation was obtained between the fitted data and the Weibull distribution for each case studied. Monthly and yearly analysis were performed at both locations, and it was noted that Plaisance has generally a high wind speed throughout the year while Vacoas has high wind speed in July. For both sites, the maximum power yielded was found to be during the winter period. The performances of six commercial wind turbines were also studied for that area and results showed that at higher altitudes the Aeolos 3 kW wind turbine yielded the most important energy output.



---

*Source: 613936-2015-10-29.xml*