# Preparation of a New Borehole Sealing Material of Coal Seam Water Infusion

Authors: Gang Wang; Hao Liu; Jianhong Luo; Hao Xu; Qiqi Liu; Xiaohua Zhou; Yanwei Hu; Xuelin Liu
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

To improve the borehole sealing effect of coal seam water infusion, especially that of coal seam with low permeability and high rigidity, this study investigated the performance test optimization of two cement-based sealing materials. The borehole sealing effect of this coal seam requires high-pressure water infusion. Result shows that when the water-cement ratio is 0.4 and the amount of fiber expansive agent is 10%, the new borehole sealing material displays microexpansion. In addition, the 1-day compressive strength reaches 16 MPa. This result satisfies the material compressive strength requirement under 30 MPa high-pressure water infusion. The sealing performance is also excellent. According to the scanning electron microscopy analysis of new borehole and traditional borehole sealing materials, the surface of new borehole sealing material shows no holes and possesses compactness. The sealing effect is superior to that of other traditional sealing materials. This effect can satisfy the sealing requirement of coal seam water infusion. The new borehole sealing material is considerably significant for the improvement of the water infusion effect.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

As one of the major resources in China, coal accounts for over 70% of primary energy [1]. A considerable amount of dust, generated during coal mining production threatens the physical health of mining workers and safe production of mines to a substantial degree [2, 3]. Water infusion acts as the most efficient method of dust prevention in coal face. The key process of coal seam water infusion is borehole sealing, whose quality influences the effect of coal seam water infusion directly [4, 5]. Nevertheless, in the process of coal mine drilling, the fissure network inside boreholes further develops. The stress field of roadway surrounding rocks underground coal mines also exerts remarkable influence on fissure development. Thus, borehole sealing is a significant challenge.Optimization of borehole sealing material determines the success of borehole sealing [6]. Currently in the process of underground coal mine production, all kinds of borehole sealing materials are used; these materials mainly include clay material, high-water material, polymer material, and cement-based sealing material. Clay material is easy to operate and convenient for borehole sealing at low cost. However, the rigidity of clay material should be moderate because high softness or high hardness can both lead to poor sealing effect. As a new type of special cement composite material, high-water material displays high condensation rate, quick development of compressive strength, and microexpansion. Nonetheless, given the abundant composition, high-water material is costly. As a typical example of polymer material, polyurethane shows the advantages of high expansibility, high borehole sealing rate, and convenience, but it displays weak cementing power and low compressive strength. Polyurethane can also be toxic and expensive. With a long history of application and investigation, cement-based borehole sealing material also exhibits many advantages, such as a wide range of raw material sources, low cost, and simple operation. Moreover, cement-based borehole material demonstrates special advantages in the practice of borehole sealing; for example, its excellent mechanical property can support the borehole wall and resist the disturbances caused by geological factors in mining activities. Under the condition of borehole pressurized sealing, cement slurry can permeate the fissures of borehole wall and seal leaky fissures effectively. Therefore, cement-based borehole sealing material is widely used in the practice of coal mining borehole sealing [7, 8].In spite of these advantages, cement-based borehole sealing material suffers from shrinkage-cracking. The compressive strength of this material also develops slowly, and the setting time is long. In view of these drawbacks of cement-based borehole sealing material, local and international scholars carried out many studies. Some scholars found that addition of a certain amount of fly ash into cement-based borehole sealing material reduces the material hydration heat, restrains shrinkage-cracking, and improves the material synthetic performance. According to Termkhajornkit et al. [9] and Atiş [10], addition of a certain amount of fly ash into concrete helps restrain shrinkage considerably and improve the compressive strength. Nath and Sarker [11] and Chindaprasirt et al. [12] studied the durability of fly ash and cement slurry comprehensively in terms of compressive strength, shrinkage, Chloride ion adsorption, and permeability. They also identified that appropriate addition of fly ash contributes to the improvement of cement slurry durability. Nevertheless, the influence of fly ash on cement slurry is complex. Fly ash overdose results in negative effects. Hence, synthetic performance, inconvenient operation, and low strength during the early stage should be taken into account. Lim et al. [13] believed that sand gradation also exerts a significant effect on the properties of cement slurry; the strength and durability of solidified fine-sand-cement slurry are better than those of coarse sand under high water-cement ratio. Cement mortar is cheap and easy to operate, but it easily suffers from shrinkage and cracking. Ni et al. [14] explored the microcharacteristics of borehole sealing composite material that is composed of polyurethane and expansive cement. Ge et al. [15] proposed a kind of borehole sealing material, which is a mixture of cement, early-strength water-reducing admixture, polypropylene fiber, and water. The material shows low shrinkage rate and high compressive strength, but the required borehole sealing compressive strength can be satisfied for at least 3 days after sealing. The construction period is also extended. Zhai et al. [16] analyzed the sealing performance of flexible gel sealing material. This material exhibits excellent compactness, stability, fluidity, and permeability. However, given the multiple composition and complicated configuration, the material cost is high.Although local and international scholars conducted a large number of research on cement-based borehole sealing material, the required performance and cost cannot be satisfied simultaneously [17–19]. The present study uses 32.5R Portland cement and 52.5R sulfoaluminate cement as major ingredients. Fiber expansive agent and early-strength water-reducing admixture are also added into the cement. Material optimization against problems of cement borehole sealing, such as low strength in the early stage, high shrinkage rate, and poor impact resistance, is also investigated. According to the experimental field result of Ge et al. [20] which plugging of 30 MPa water infusion pressure requires a borehole sealing material compressive strength of 14.4 MPa, the preset value of the compressive strength should be at least 14.4 MPa. Additionally, the required expansion property is microexpansion. To satisfy these two performance requirements, borehole sealing performance is also explored through tests under different water-cement ratios and additives amounts. The optimum material proportion is determined so that a new type of borehole sealing material can be developed.


## 2. Test

### 2.1. Raw Materials

On the basis of the performance requirements of borehole sealing, two different kinds of cement are selected as major ingredients of two sealing materials (materials 1, and 2). The major ingredients of materials 1 and 2 are ordinary 32.5R Portland cement and 52.5R sulfoaluminate cement, respectively. These cements were both purchased from China Gezhouba Group Cement Co. Ltd. (Hubei, China). Fiber expansive agent and early-strength water-reducing admixture are the minor ingredients of material 1. Only the fiber expansive agent is selected as the minor ingredient of material 2. The fiber expansive agent (Shanxi Qinfen Building Material Co., Ltd.) is a compound of calcium silicate and polypropylene fiber; the design amount of this admixture is 8.0%–12.0% of gel material amount. The performance parameter of this expansive agent is shown in Table1. The early-strength water-reducing admixture (Qingdao Hongsha Admixture) is composed of calcium lignosulfonate and fly ash, and its design amount is 2%–8% of gel material amount.Table 1
Fiber expansive agent performance parameter.
Type
Form
Color
Water content
pH
Chloride content
EA
Powder
Dark brown
3.0%
7.0-8.0
0.01%


### 2.2. Test Plan

To obtain the borehole sealing material proportion that satisfies the abovementioned requirements, the borehole sealing material performances, such as expansion performance and compressive strength, are evaluated under different water-cement and admixture ratios. The water-cement ratios of material 1 are 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6 in sequence. The fiber expansive agent and early-strength water-reducing admixture are added through combinations of composite ratio. The water-cement ratio of material 2 is 0.4, 0.45, and 0.5 in sequence. The design amounts of the two kinds of fiber expansive agents are consistent with each other. The amounts of fiber expansive agent and early-strength water-reducing admixture are shown in Table2.Table 2
Material proportion.
Admixture
Proportion
Amount of fiber expansive agent
8%
9%
10%
11%
12%
Amount of early-strength water-reducing admixture
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%


#### 2.2.1. Expansion Performance Test

In the expansion performance test, well-prepared slurry (300 ml) is poured into a 500 ml beaker. Five test specimens are prepared for each composition ratio and shown in Figure1. In the laboratory curing condition of 25°–30°C lab, the volume is read every 2 min and recorded as V1, V2, V3, V4, and Vn sequentially, where Vn is the final volume. The recorded Vn is the average of five specimens.Figure 1
Evaluation of expansion performance.


#### 2.2.2. Uniaxial Compressive Strength Test

The wall of the mold (70.7 mm × 70.7 mm × 70.7 mm) is coated with a layer of release agent and poured slurry, which is well stirred into the mold. A vibrating table is used to densify the slurry, which is poured into the curing box of 95% relative humidity and 20°C temperature until the scheduled age. Subsequently, the sample is demolded. The pressure testing machine of electrohydraulic servo is used to assess the uniaxial compressive strength of the sample after 1-day curing with a loading speed of 0.3 MPa/s. The test is terminated when the sample is broken. The test equipment is shown in Figure2.Figure 2
Compressive strength evaluation.


#### 2.2.3. Microstructure Comparisons

JSM-6510LV high- and low-vacuum scanning electron microscope is used to observe the structure and fissure of borehole sealing material in the reaction process. The microscope amplification ranges from quintupling to 300,000 times. The actual product is shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Scanning electron microscope.The scanning electron microscope is used to observe and analyze the microstructure of polyurethane, cement mortar, and new borehole sealing material. The test procedures are as follows:(1)
Prepare two groups of polyurethane, cement mortar, and new borehole sealing material in beakers and record them as groups A and B. Place them in the curing box at 30°C and 101.325 kPa with group A for 1 day and group B for 7 days.(2)
To observe the microstructure of specimens, polish well-cured sample into a cylinder sample (10 mm, radius, and 1 mm, thickness).(3)
Soak the sample in alcohol for 5 min to remove dust from the sample surface. Further, purge the sample with an ear washing bulb to ensure that the surface is free from dust. Afterward, spray gold on the sample.(4)
Observe the material microstructure with scanning electron microscope.


## 2.1. Raw Materials

On the basis of the performance requirements of borehole sealing, two different kinds of cement are selected as major ingredients of two sealing materials (materials 1, and 2). The major ingredients of materials 1 and 2 are ordinary 32.5R Portland cement and 52.5R sulfoaluminate cement, respectively. These cements were both purchased from China Gezhouba Group Cement Co. Ltd. (Hubei, China). Fiber expansive agent and early-strength water-reducing admixture are the minor ingredients of material 1. Only the fiber expansive agent is selected as the minor ingredient of material 2. The fiber expansive agent (Shanxi Qinfen Building Material Co., Ltd.) is a compound of calcium silicate and polypropylene fiber; the design amount of this admixture is 8.0%–12.0% of gel material amount. The performance parameter of this expansive agent is shown in Table1. The early-strength water-reducing admixture (Qingdao Hongsha Admixture) is composed of calcium lignosulfonate and fly ash, and its design amount is 2%–8% of gel material amount.Table 1
Fiber expansive agent performance parameter.
Type
Form
Color
Water content
pH
Chloride content
EA
Powder
Dark brown
3.0%
7.0-8.0
0.01%


## 2.2. Test Plan

To obtain the borehole sealing material proportion that satisfies the abovementioned requirements, the borehole sealing material performances, such as expansion performance and compressive strength, are evaluated under different water-cement and admixture ratios. The water-cement ratios of material 1 are 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6 in sequence. The fiber expansive agent and early-strength water-reducing admixture are added through combinations of composite ratio. The water-cement ratio of material 2 is 0.4, 0.45, and 0.5 in sequence. The design amounts of the two kinds of fiber expansive agents are consistent with each other. The amounts of fiber expansive agent and early-strength water-reducing admixture are shown in Table2.Table 2
Material proportion.
Admixture
Proportion
Amount of fiber expansive agent
8%
9%
10%
11%
12%
Amount of early-strength water-reducing admixture
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%


### 2.2.1. Expansion Performance Test

In the expansion performance test, well-prepared slurry (300 ml) is poured into a 500 ml beaker. Five test specimens are prepared for each composition ratio and shown in Figure1. In the laboratory curing condition of 25°–30°C lab, the volume is read every 2 min and recorded as V1, V2, V3, V4, and Vn sequentially, where Vn is the final volume. The recorded Vn is the average of five specimens.Figure 1
Evaluation of expansion performance.


### 2.2.2. Uniaxial Compressive Strength Test

The wall of the mold (70.7 mm × 70.7 mm × 70.7 mm) is coated with a layer of release agent and poured slurry, which is well stirred into the mold. A vibrating table is used to densify the slurry, which is poured into the curing box of 95% relative humidity and 20°C temperature until the scheduled age. Subsequently, the sample is demolded. The pressure testing machine of electrohydraulic servo is used to assess the uniaxial compressive strength of the sample after 1-day curing with a loading speed of 0.3 MPa/s. The test is terminated when the sample is broken. The test equipment is shown in Figure2.Figure 2
Compressive strength evaluation.


### 2.2.3. Microstructure Comparisons

JSM-6510LV high- and low-vacuum scanning electron microscope is used to observe the structure and fissure of borehole sealing material in the reaction process. The microscope amplification ranges from quintupling to 300,000 times. The actual product is shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Scanning electron microscope.The scanning electron microscope is used to observe and analyze the microstructure of polyurethane, cement mortar, and new borehole sealing material. The test procedures are as follows:(1)
Prepare two groups of polyurethane, cement mortar, and new borehole sealing material in beakers and record them as groups A and B. Place them in the curing box at 30°C and 101.325 kPa with group A for 1 day and group B for 7 days.(2)
To observe the microstructure of specimens, polish well-cured sample into a cylinder sample (10 mm, radius, and 1 mm, thickness).(3)
Soak the sample in alcohol for 5 min to remove dust from the sample surface. Further, purge the sample with an ear washing bulb to ensure that the surface is free from dust. Afterward, spray gold on the sample.(4)
Observe the material microstructure with scanning electron microscope.


## 2.2.1. Expansion Performance Test

In the expansion performance test, well-prepared slurry (300 ml) is poured into a 500 ml beaker. Five test specimens are prepared for each composition ratio and shown in Figure1. In the laboratory curing condition of 25°–30°C lab, the volume is read every 2 min and recorded as V1, V2, V3, V4, and Vn sequentially, where Vn is the final volume. The recorded Vn is the average of five specimens.Figure 1
Evaluation of expansion performance.


## 2.2.2. Uniaxial Compressive Strength Test

The wall of the mold (70.7 mm × 70.7 mm × 70.7 mm) is coated with a layer of release agent and poured slurry, which is well stirred into the mold. A vibrating table is used to densify the slurry, which is poured into the curing box of 95% relative humidity and 20°C temperature until the scheduled age. Subsequently, the sample is demolded. The pressure testing machine of electrohydraulic servo is used to assess the uniaxial compressive strength of the sample after 1-day curing with a loading speed of 0.3 MPa/s. The test is terminated when the sample is broken. The test equipment is shown in Figure2.Figure 2
Compressive strength evaluation.


## 2.2.3. Microstructure Comparisons

JSM-6510LV high- and low-vacuum scanning electron microscope is used to observe the structure and fissure of borehole sealing material in the reaction process. The microscope amplification ranges from quintupling to 300,000 times. The actual product is shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Scanning electron microscope.The scanning electron microscope is used to observe and analyze the microstructure of polyurethane, cement mortar, and new borehole sealing material. The test procedures are as follows:(1)
Prepare two groups of polyurethane, cement mortar, and new borehole sealing material in beakers and record them as groups A and B. Place them in the curing box at 30°C and 101.325 kPa with group A for 1 day and group B for 7 days.(2)
To observe the microstructure of specimens, polish well-cured sample into a cylinder sample (10 mm, radius, and 1 mm, thickness).(3)
Soak the sample in alcohol for 5 min to remove dust from the sample surface. Further, purge the sample with an ear washing bulb to ensure that the surface is free from dust. Afterward, spray gold on the sample.(4)
Observe the material microstructure with scanning electron microscope.


## 3. Test Result and Discussion

### 3.1. Expansion Performance Test

For material 1, the slurry with a water-cement ratio of 0.4 shows high viscosity and low fluidity, thereby causing difficulty in pumping. When the water-cement ratio increases to 0.6, slurry bleeding occurs. Consequently, a large amount of free water is exuded on the slurry surface. The setting and hardening of material are affected, and the water retention capacity of material decreases. A large quantity of free water evaporates after setting, which reduces the material volume. As a consequence, the water-cement ratio of material 1 is 0.5. The variation of expansion performance with admixture is shown in Figure4. The expansion performance and compressive strength of material 2 are evaluated, when the water-cement ratio of the slurry is 0.4, 0.45, and 0.5, and the mixing amount of fiber expansive agent is 8%, 9%, 10%, 11%, and 12%. The variation of expansion performance with water-cement ratio and amount admixture is shown in Figure 4.Figure 4
Material volume varies with composition ratio.According to Figure4 (the icon being early-strength water-reducing agent), under fixed water-cement ratio and invariable amount of early-strength water-reducing agent, the final volume of material 1 increases with the amount of fiber expansive agent. When the early-strength water-reducing agent is 7%, the final expansive volume of material 1 increases the fastest. Thus, an improved condition is created for the expansion of material to fissures around after grouting. Material composition ratios above the dotted line expand the material slightly. To further optimize the composition ratio of material 1, the compressive strength test results should be analyzed to draw the final conclusion.Figure5 shows that the final volume of material 2 decreases with the increased water-cement ratio. Under the same water-cement ratio, the final volume of material 2 increases with the amount of fiber expansive agent. Water-cement ratio is the main factor affecting the expansion performance of material 2. When the water-cement ratio is 0.5, the favorable fluidity of material 2 is conducive to grouting, but the microexpansion requirements are unsatisfied. When the water-cement ratio is 0.4 or 0.45, the adjustment of the amount of fiber expansive agent helps expand material 2. Consequently, the compressive strength of material 2 is evaluated under the water-cement ratio of 0.4 and 0.45 so as to further optimize composition ratio of material 2.Figure 5
Expansion performance of material varies with the amount of fiber expansive agent.


### 3.2. Compressive Strength Test

Figure6 illustrates that after 1-day setting of material 1, the compressive strength remains under 3.5 MPa regardless of the variation in the composition ratio of admixture. This value fails to satisfy the preset value requirements of borehole sealing material. Given the long setting time of 32.5R cement, the compressive strength after 1 day setting is considerably less than the final strength. At least 3 days of setting time is needed after borehole sealing to satisfy the strength requirement of water infusion so that the construction period will be delayed.Figure 6
Compressive strength of material varies with composition ratio.Figure7 presents that the compressive strength at 0.4 water-cement ratio is constantly higher than that at 0.5, when the amount of fiber expansive agent of material 2 is less than 12%. Furthermore, many fissures are present on material surface when the water-cement ratio is 0.45. Decreased compactness is harmful to borehole sealing. Therefore, the selected water-cement ratio of the new material is 0.4. When the amount of fiber expansive agent is 10%, the compressive strength is the highest at 16 MPa, which is higher than the preset value of 14.4 MPa. The preset value requirements of the compressive strength of borehole sealing are fully satisfied.Figure 7
Compressive strength varies with fiber expansive agent.According to the expansion performance and compressive strength tests of materials 1 and 2, material 2 is the new borehole sealing material. When the water-cement ratio is 0.4 and the amount of fiber expansive agent is 10%, material 2 expands slightly and 1-day compressive strength reaches 16 MPa. The material compressive strength requirements under 30 MPa water infusion pressure and the site construction needs are both satisfied. Thus, the composition ratio is the optimum composition.


### 3.3. Microstructure Comparisons

The microstructure comparisons of the new material, polyurethane, and cement mortar are as shown in Figure8.Figure 8
Microstructure comparison of three kinds of materials. (a) First day (×50). (b) Seventh day (×50). (c) First day (×500). (d) Seventh day (×500). (e) First day (×500). (f) Seventh day (×500).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)Figure8(a) shows that the interior structure of polyurethane presents honeycomb-like reticular formation when magnified 50 times with large interior pore space. Cavity array is formed, and the diameter of each cavity is 0.1–0.5 mm. Interconnecting holes between adjacent cavities also occur, which result in poor overall compactness. Figure 8(c) presents the amplified picture (500x) after 1 day setting of cement mortar. Many pores can be observed on its surface, and the compactness is poor. Figure 8(e) is illustrates the amplified picture (500x) of the new material. The surface of the new material is compact without any holes and fissures. Consequently, leakage can be restrained effectively when water passes through the material in the process of coal seam water infusion. In addition, the influence of borehole sealing material on water infusion effect can be prevented. As shown in Figure 8(b), macroholes are formed on the surface of polyurethane 7 days later. Hence, the PU compactness is poor. Figure 8(d) shows that the cement mortar surface is uneven with many pores and poor compactness after 7 days curing. The surface of the new material after 7 days curing is more compact with better borehole sealing effect than that of the new material after 1-day curing (Figure 8(f)).


## 3.1. Expansion Performance Test

For material 1, the slurry with a water-cement ratio of 0.4 shows high viscosity and low fluidity, thereby causing difficulty in pumping. When the water-cement ratio increases to 0.6, slurry bleeding occurs. Consequently, a large amount of free water is exuded on the slurry surface. The setting and hardening of material are affected, and the water retention capacity of material decreases. A large quantity of free water evaporates after setting, which reduces the material volume. As a consequence, the water-cement ratio of material 1 is 0.5. The variation of expansion performance with admixture is shown in Figure4. The expansion performance and compressive strength of material 2 are evaluated, when the water-cement ratio of the slurry is 0.4, 0.45, and 0.5, and the mixing amount of fiber expansive agent is 8%, 9%, 10%, 11%, and 12%. The variation of expansion performance with water-cement ratio and amount admixture is shown in Figure 4.Figure 4
Material volume varies with composition ratio.According to Figure4 (the icon being early-strength water-reducing agent), under fixed water-cement ratio and invariable amount of early-strength water-reducing agent, the final volume of material 1 increases with the amount of fiber expansive agent. When the early-strength water-reducing agent is 7%, the final expansive volume of material 1 increases the fastest. Thus, an improved condition is created for the expansion of material to fissures around after grouting. Material composition ratios above the dotted line expand the material slightly. To further optimize the composition ratio of material 1, the compressive strength test results should be analyzed to draw the final conclusion.Figure5 shows that the final volume of material 2 decreases with the increased water-cement ratio. Under the same water-cement ratio, the final volume of material 2 increases with the amount of fiber expansive agent. Water-cement ratio is the main factor affecting the expansion performance of material 2. When the water-cement ratio is 0.5, the favorable fluidity of material 2 is conducive to grouting, but the microexpansion requirements are unsatisfied. When the water-cement ratio is 0.4 or 0.45, the adjustment of the amount of fiber expansive agent helps expand material 2. Consequently, the compressive strength of material 2 is evaluated under the water-cement ratio of 0.4 and 0.45 so as to further optimize composition ratio of material 2.Figure 5
Expansion performance of material varies with the amount of fiber expansive agent.


## 3.2. Compressive Strength Test

Figure6 illustrates that after 1-day setting of material 1, the compressive strength remains under 3.5 MPa regardless of the variation in the composition ratio of admixture. This value fails to satisfy the preset value requirements of borehole sealing material. Given the long setting time of 32.5R cement, the compressive strength after 1 day setting is considerably less than the final strength. At least 3 days of setting time is needed after borehole sealing to satisfy the strength requirement of water infusion so that the construction period will be delayed.Figure 6
Compressive strength of material varies with composition ratio.Figure7 presents that the compressive strength at 0.4 water-cement ratio is constantly higher than that at 0.5, when the amount of fiber expansive agent of material 2 is less than 12%. Furthermore, many fissures are present on material surface when the water-cement ratio is 0.45. Decreased compactness is harmful to borehole sealing. Therefore, the selected water-cement ratio of the new material is 0.4. When the amount of fiber expansive agent is 10%, the compressive strength is the highest at 16 MPa, which is higher than the preset value of 14.4 MPa. The preset value requirements of the compressive strength of borehole sealing are fully satisfied.Figure 7
Compressive strength varies with fiber expansive agent.According to the expansion performance and compressive strength tests of materials 1 and 2, material 2 is the new borehole sealing material. When the water-cement ratio is 0.4 and the amount of fiber expansive agent is 10%, material 2 expands slightly and 1-day compressive strength reaches 16 MPa. The material compressive strength requirements under 30 MPa water infusion pressure and the site construction needs are both satisfied. Thus, the composition ratio is the optimum composition.


## 3.3. Microstructure Comparisons

The microstructure comparisons of the new material, polyurethane, and cement mortar are as shown in Figure8.Figure 8
Microstructure comparison of three kinds of materials. (a) First day (×50). (b) Seventh day (×50). (c) First day (×500). (d) Seventh day (×500). (e) First day (×500). (f) Seventh day (×500).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)Figure8(a) shows that the interior structure of polyurethane presents honeycomb-like reticular formation when magnified 50 times with large interior pore space. Cavity array is formed, and the diameter of each cavity is 0.1–0.5 mm. Interconnecting holes between adjacent cavities also occur, which result in poor overall compactness. Figure 8(c) presents the amplified picture (500x) after 1 day setting of cement mortar. Many pores can be observed on its surface, and the compactness is poor. Figure 8(e) is illustrates the amplified picture (500x) of the new material. The surface of the new material is compact without any holes and fissures. Consequently, leakage can be restrained effectively when water passes through the material in the process of coal seam water infusion. In addition, the influence of borehole sealing material on water infusion effect can be prevented. As shown in Figure 8(b), macroholes are formed on the surface of polyurethane 7 days later. Hence, the PU compactness is poor. Figure 8(d) shows that the cement mortar surface is uneven with many pores and poor compactness after 7 days curing. The surface of the new material after 7 days curing is more compact with better borehole sealing effect than that of the new material after 1-day curing (Figure 8(f)).


## 4. Conclusion

To solve the problems on borehole sealing and microfissure sealing through application of material composite technology, research is conducted for the development of laboratory materials, performance test, and comparisons with traditional borehole sealing material. The following conclusions are obtained:(1)
Cement types exert a significant effect on the sealing performance of cement-based borehole sealing materials. Therefore, cement should be selected carefully before determining the cement-based borehole sealing materials.(2)
52.5R sulfoaluminate cement is selected as the major ingredient and the fiber expansive agent as minor ingredient to produce a new kind of borehole sealing material. Performance tests’ results demonstrate that when the water-cement ratio is 0.4 and the amount of fiber expansive agent is 10%, the optimum expansion performance and compressive strength are obtained. The compressive strength after 1 day reaches 16 MPa, thereby satisfying the compressive strength requirement of borehole sealing material under 30 MPa water infusion pressure.(3)
The microstructures of the new and traditional materials are observed and analyzed with a scanning electron microscope. Amplified images show that the surface of the new material is compact without interconnecting holes. Moreover, polyurethane forms honeycomb-like reticular formation and cavity array; the large pore space of cement mortar results in poor compactness. The expansion performance, compressive strength, and compactness of new borehole sealing material are all superior to those of traditional borehole sealing materials. The new material provides a new approach for underground coal seam infusion.



---

*Source: 5924614-2018-03-20.xml*