# Experimental Design-Based Response Surface Methodology Optimization for Synthesis ofβ-Mercapto Carbonyl Derivatives as Antimycobacterial Drugs Catalyzed by Calcium Pyrophosphate

Authors: Younes Abrouki; Abdelkader Anouzla; Hayat Loukili; Jamal Bennazha; Rabiaâ Lotfi; Ahmed Rayadh; My Abdellah Bahlaoui; Saïd Sebti; Driss Zakarya; Mohamed Zahouily
Journal: International Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

A simple protocol for the efficient preparation ofβ-mercapto carbonyl derivatives as antimycobacterial drugs has been achieved via Thia-Michael reaction between chalcones derivatives and thiols in the presence of calcium pyrophosphate as a heterogeneous catalyst under mild reaction conditions. The central composite design was used to design an experimental program to provide data to model the effects of various factors on reaction yield (
Y
). The variables chosen were catalyst weight X
1, reaction time X
2, and solvent volume X
3. The mathematical relationship of reaction yield on the three significant independent variables can be approximated by a nonlinear polynomial model. Predicted values were found to be in good agreement with experimental values. The optimum reaction conditions for reaction model (chalcone and thiophenol) obtained by response surface were applied to other substrates. This procedure provides several advantages such as high yield, clean product formation, and short reaction time.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Tuberculosis is the second most common cause of death from infectious disease. Roughly one-third of the world’s population has been infected withMycobacterium tuberculosis, and new infections occur at a rate of one per second. In 2007 there were an estimated 13.7 million chronic active cases, and in 2010 there were 8.8 million new cases and 1.45 million deaths. 0.35 million of these deaths occur in those coinfected with HIV [1].The needs of newly developed antimycobacterial drugs are required for the control of tuberculosis in the present time. In the discovery of new antimycobacterial drugs, the emergence of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant strains ofMycobacterium has encouraged the researchers to intensify the efforts to discover novel drugs [2].Recently, the Czech authors showed that the 1,3-diphenyl-3-arylsulfenylpropan-1-one derivatives presented an antimycobacterial activity [3].Thia-Michael reaction is a convenient route for synthesis of theseβ-mercapto carbonyl derivatives [4]. Traditionally, this reaction is catalyzed by strong bases [5] such as alkali metal alkoxides, hydroxides, and amines. However the use of either strongly acidic or basic conditions frequently leads to the formation of undesirable side products owing to competing reactions, such as polymerization, self-condensation, and rearrangements. The development of solid basic catalysts which could replace the liquid bases currently used in industrial processes is a major field of today’s catalysis research [6].In this paper we report a mild and convenient method for synthesis ofβ-mercapto carbonyl derivatives as antimycobacterial drugs catalyzed by calcium pyrophosphate using central composite experimental design [7].


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Preparation and Characterization of Catalyst

The calcium pyrophosphate (CP) was prepared by the dehydration of CaHPO4 at 750°C for 2 h. The powder was dried for 2 hours at 100°C before use in order to eliminate possible water molecules adsorbed on the surface of the sample which may affect catalytic activity [8]. Analysis of CP catalyst by X-ray diffraction showed a single phase of β-Ca2P2O7. The analysis of morphology for this catalyst by scanning electron micrograph showed that the particle size of CP powder is less than 1 μm.


### 2.2. General Procedure

The general procedure for synthesis ofβ-mercapto carbonyl derivatives is reported in Figure 1 as follows: to a flask containing an equimolar mixture (1 mmol) of chalcones, derivatives as Michael acceptors1 and thiols as Michael donors2 in methanol catalyzed by CP were added, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature until completion of the reaction, as monitored by thin layer chromatography.Figure 1
Synthesis ofβ-mercapto carbonyl derivatives.The catalyst was filtered and washed with dichloromethane, and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by crystallization. The product was analyzed by1H, 13C NMR, and IR spectrometry.1,3-Diphenyl-3-phenylsulfenylpropan-1-one (3a). White solid, mp 116–118°C; Rf (10% AcOEt/hexane) 0.36; υmax (KBr)1680 cm−1;δH (400 MHz CDCl3) 3.5 (H, CH2, dd, J
1
=
6.2 Hz, J
2
=
17.2 Hz); 3.7 (H, CH2, dd, J
1
=
8.1 Hz, J
2
=
17.2 Hz); 4.98 (H, CH, t, J
=
7.2 Hz); 7.2–7.6 (13H, arom, m); 7.9 (2H, arom, d, J
=
7.5); δC (100 MHz CDCl3) 44.7; 48.3; 127.4; 127.6; 127.9; 128.1; 128.5; 128.6; 128.9; 132.8; 133.3; 134.6; 136.8; 141.3; 197.9; MS (m/z): 318 (M+); 206; 109.3-(4-Chlorophenyl)-1-phenyl-3-phenylsulfenylpropan-1-one (3b). White solid; mp 64–67°C; Rf (10% AcOEt/hexane) 0.35; υmax (KBr) 1730  cm−1; δH (400 MHz CDCl3) 3.6 (2H, CH2, m); 4.97 (H, CH, t, J
=
7
.
2 Hz); 7.2–7.5 (12H, arom, m); 7.9 (2H, arom, d, J
=
7.5 Hz); δC (100 MHz CDCl3) 44.2; 47.8; 122.3; 122.7; 128.1; 128.3; 128.8; 129.1; 129.3; 132.9; 133.4; 133.6; 134.2; 136.3; 143.8; 148.2; 196.1; MS (m/z): 353 (M+); 241.91; 109.3-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-1-phenyl-3-phenylsulfenyl-propan-1-one (3c). White solid; 83–85°C; Rf (10% AcOEt/hexane) 0.26; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 1730  cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 3.62 (2H, dd, J
1
=
7.5 Hz, J
2
=
15.2 Hz, J
3
=
17.2 Hz, CH2), 3.76 (3H, s, OCH3); 4,92 (H, dd, J
1 = 6,2 Hz, J
2
=
8.1 Hz, CH), 6.78 (2H, m, J
=
8.6 Hz, arom), 7.1–8.05 (12H, m, arom); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 197.19, 158.77, 144.7, 136.78, 134.48, 133.13, 129.1, 128.63, 128.09, 127.47, 119.82, 114.46, 113.86, 55.33, 47.67, 44.86; MS (m/z): 348 (M+), 239, 238, 237, 109.3-(2-Aminophenylsulfenyl)-1,3-diphenylpropan-1-one (3d). White solid; mp 126–128°C; Rf (10% AcOEt/hexane) 0.20; υmax (KBr) 1710; 3410  cm−1; δH (400 MHz CDCl3) 3.5 (H, CH2, dd, J
1
=
7.0 Hz, J
2
=
17.4 Hz); 3.7 (H, CH2, dd, J
1
=
7.3 Hz, J
2
=
17.4 Hz); 4.3 (2H, NH2, bs); 4,73 (H, CH, t, J
=
7.1 Hz); 6.53–7.54 (12H, arom, m); 7.9 (2H, arom, d, J
=
7.2 Hz); δC (100 MHz, CDCl3) 44.1; 47.1; 114.9; 115.3; 115.7; 118.0; 118.2; 127.3; 127.6; 128.1; 128.4; 128.6; 130.6; 131.6; 133.3; 136.8; 137.7; 141.7; 148.7; 149.5; 197.2; MS (m/z): 333 (M+); 207; 126.3-(2-Aminophenylsulfenyl)-3-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-phenylpropan-1-one (3e). White solid; mp 78–81°C; Rf (10% AcOEt/hexane) 0.33; υmax (KBr) 1700; 3470  cm−1; δH (400 MHz CDCl3) 3.4 (H, CH2, dd, J
1
=
7.1 Hz, J
2
=
17.5 Hz); 3.6 (H, CH2, dd, J
1
=
7.2 Hz, J
2
=
17.5 Hz); 4.1 (2H, NH2, bs); 4.9 (1H, CH, t, J
=
7.1 Hz); 6.5–7,5 (11H, arom, m); 7.9 (2H, arom, d, J
=
7.2 Hz); δC (100 MHz CDCl3) 43.4; 45.8; 115.2; 118.3; 118.8; 122.2; 122.5; 128.1; 128.7; 129.1; 131.1; 131.6; 133.6; 134.1; 136.8; 137.5; 148.6; 149.4; 196. MS (m/z) 367 (M+); 242; 111.3-(2-Aminophenylsulfenyl)-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1-phenyl-propan-1-one (3f). White solid; 108–111°C; Rf: (10% AcOEt/hexane) 0.24; IR (KBr, ν cm−1):3420, 1730  cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 3.52 (2H, dd, J
1
=
7.5 Hz, J
2
=
15.2 Hz, J
3
=
17.3 Hz, CH2), 3.76 (3H, s, OCH3), 4.2 (2H, s, NH2), 4,8 (H, dd, J
1
=
6,2 Hz, J
2
=
8.1 Hz, CH), 6.48–7.76 (11H, m, arom), 7.95 (2H, d, J
=
7.4 Hz, arom); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 19736, 158.74, 149.5, 137.69, 136.33, 135.10, 133.25, 131.13, 130.62, 129.71, 129.72, 128.10, 127.49, 127.19, 125.32, 123.01, 118.07, 114.88, 114.09, 113.77, 55.30, 46.32, 44.32; MS (m/z): 363 (M+), 239, 238, 237, 125.


### 2.3. Statistical Analysis

A central composite rotatable design fork independent variables was employed to design the experiments in which the variance of the predicted response, Y, at some points of independent variables, X, is only a function of the distance from the point to the design centre.The design of experiment is intended to reduce the number of experiments and to arrange the experiments with various combinations of independent variables. In the rotatable design, the standard error, which depends on the coordinates of the point on the response surface at whichŶ is evaluated and on the coefficients β, is the same for all points that have the same distance from the central point.These designs consist of a2
k factorial (coded to the usual ±1 notation) augmented by 2
*
k axial points (±α, 0, 0), (0, ±α, 0), (0, 0, ±α) and 2 centre points (0, 0, 0). The value of α for rotatability depends on the number of points in the factorial portion of the design, which is given in
(1)
α
=
(
N
F
)
1
/
4
,
where N
F is the number of points in the cube portion of the design (N
F
=
2
k, k is the number of factors). Since there are three factors, the N
F number is equal to 8 points, while α is equal to 1.682 according to (1). In this study, the response was reaction yield. Each response was used to develop an empirical model that correlated the response to the reaction conditions variables for synthesis of an antimycobacterial drug, using a second-degree polynomial equation as given by
(2)
Ŷ
=
β
0
+
Σ
β
i
X
i
+
Σ
β
i
i
X
i
2
+
Σ
β
i
j
X
i
X
j
,
where β
0 is the constant coefficient, β
i is the linear coefficients, β
i
j is the cross-product coefficients, and β
i
i is the quadratic coefficients. The software Statgraphics-Plus was used for the experimental design, data analysis, model building, and graph plotting.


## 2.1. Preparation and Characterization of Catalyst

The calcium pyrophosphate (CP) was prepared by the dehydration of CaHPO4 at 750°C for 2 h. The powder was dried for 2 hours at 100°C before use in order to eliminate possible water molecules adsorbed on the surface of the sample which may affect catalytic activity [8]. Analysis of CP catalyst by X-ray diffraction showed a single phase of β-Ca2P2O7. The analysis of morphology for this catalyst by scanning electron micrograph showed that the particle size of CP powder is less than 1 μm.


## 2.2. General Procedure

The general procedure for synthesis ofβ-mercapto carbonyl derivatives is reported in Figure 1 as follows: to a flask containing an equimolar mixture (1 mmol) of chalcones, derivatives as Michael acceptors1 and thiols as Michael donors2 in methanol catalyzed by CP were added, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature until completion of the reaction, as monitored by thin layer chromatography.Figure 1
Synthesis ofβ-mercapto carbonyl derivatives.The catalyst was filtered and washed with dichloromethane, and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by crystallization. The product was analyzed by1H, 13C NMR, and IR spectrometry.1,3-Diphenyl-3-phenylsulfenylpropan-1-one (3a). White solid, mp 116–118°C; Rf (10% AcOEt/hexane) 0.36; υmax (KBr)1680 cm−1;δH (400 MHz CDCl3) 3.5 (H, CH2, dd, J
1
=
6.2 Hz, J
2
=
17.2 Hz); 3.7 (H, CH2, dd, J
1
=
8.1 Hz, J
2
=
17.2 Hz); 4.98 (H, CH, t, J
=
7.2 Hz); 7.2–7.6 (13H, arom, m); 7.9 (2H, arom, d, J
=
7.5); δC (100 MHz CDCl3) 44.7; 48.3; 127.4; 127.6; 127.9; 128.1; 128.5; 128.6; 128.9; 132.8; 133.3; 134.6; 136.8; 141.3; 197.9; MS (m/z): 318 (M+); 206; 109.3-(4-Chlorophenyl)-1-phenyl-3-phenylsulfenylpropan-1-one (3b). White solid; mp 64–67°C; Rf (10% AcOEt/hexane) 0.35; υmax (KBr) 1730  cm−1; δH (400 MHz CDCl3) 3.6 (2H, CH2, m); 4.97 (H, CH, t, J
=
7
.
2 Hz); 7.2–7.5 (12H, arom, m); 7.9 (2H, arom, d, J
=
7.5 Hz); δC (100 MHz CDCl3) 44.2; 47.8; 122.3; 122.7; 128.1; 128.3; 128.8; 129.1; 129.3; 132.9; 133.4; 133.6; 134.2; 136.3; 143.8; 148.2; 196.1; MS (m/z): 353 (M+); 241.91; 109.3-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-1-phenyl-3-phenylsulfenyl-propan-1-one (3c). White solid; 83–85°C; Rf (10% AcOEt/hexane) 0.26; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 1730  cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 3.62 (2H, dd, J
1
=
7.5 Hz, J
2
=
15.2 Hz, J
3
=
17.2 Hz, CH2), 3.76 (3H, s, OCH3); 4,92 (H, dd, J
1 = 6,2 Hz, J
2
=
8.1 Hz, CH), 6.78 (2H, m, J
=
8.6 Hz, arom), 7.1–8.05 (12H, m, arom); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 197.19, 158.77, 144.7, 136.78, 134.48, 133.13, 129.1, 128.63, 128.09, 127.47, 119.82, 114.46, 113.86, 55.33, 47.67, 44.86; MS (m/z): 348 (M+), 239, 238, 237, 109.3-(2-Aminophenylsulfenyl)-1,3-diphenylpropan-1-one (3d). White solid; mp 126–128°C; Rf (10% AcOEt/hexane) 0.20; υmax (KBr) 1710; 3410  cm−1; δH (400 MHz CDCl3) 3.5 (H, CH2, dd, J
1
=
7.0 Hz, J
2
=
17.4 Hz); 3.7 (H, CH2, dd, J
1
=
7.3 Hz, J
2
=
17.4 Hz); 4.3 (2H, NH2, bs); 4,73 (H, CH, t, J
=
7.1 Hz); 6.53–7.54 (12H, arom, m); 7.9 (2H, arom, d, J
=
7.2 Hz); δC (100 MHz, CDCl3) 44.1; 47.1; 114.9; 115.3; 115.7; 118.0; 118.2; 127.3; 127.6; 128.1; 128.4; 128.6; 130.6; 131.6; 133.3; 136.8; 137.7; 141.7; 148.7; 149.5; 197.2; MS (m/z): 333 (M+); 207; 126.3-(2-Aminophenylsulfenyl)-3-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-phenylpropan-1-one (3e). White solid; mp 78–81°C; Rf (10% AcOEt/hexane) 0.33; υmax (KBr) 1700; 3470  cm−1; δH (400 MHz CDCl3) 3.4 (H, CH2, dd, J
1
=
7.1 Hz, J
2
=
17.5 Hz); 3.6 (H, CH2, dd, J
1
=
7.2 Hz, J
2
=
17.5 Hz); 4.1 (2H, NH2, bs); 4.9 (1H, CH, t, J
=
7.1 Hz); 6.5–7,5 (11H, arom, m); 7.9 (2H, arom, d, J
=
7.2 Hz); δC (100 MHz CDCl3) 43.4; 45.8; 115.2; 118.3; 118.8; 122.2; 122.5; 128.1; 128.7; 129.1; 131.1; 131.6; 133.6; 134.1; 136.8; 137.5; 148.6; 149.4; 196. MS (m/z) 367 (M+); 242; 111.3-(2-Aminophenylsulfenyl)-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1-phenyl-propan-1-one (3f). White solid; 108–111°C; Rf: (10% AcOEt/hexane) 0.24; IR (KBr, ν cm−1):3420, 1730  cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 3.52 (2H, dd, J
1
=
7.5 Hz, J
2
=
15.2 Hz, J
3
=
17.3 Hz, CH2), 3.76 (3H, s, OCH3), 4.2 (2H, s, NH2), 4,8 (H, dd, J
1
=
6,2 Hz, J
2
=
8.1 Hz, CH), 6.48–7.76 (11H, m, arom), 7.95 (2H, d, J
=
7.4 Hz, arom); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 19736, 158.74, 149.5, 137.69, 136.33, 135.10, 133.25, 131.13, 130.62, 129.71, 129.72, 128.10, 127.49, 127.19, 125.32, 123.01, 118.07, 114.88, 114.09, 113.77, 55.30, 46.32, 44.32; MS (m/z): 363 (M+), 239, 238, 237, 125.


## 2.3. Statistical Analysis

A central composite rotatable design fork independent variables was employed to design the experiments in which the variance of the predicted response, Y, at some points of independent variables, X, is only a function of the distance from the point to the design centre.The design of experiment is intended to reduce the number of experiments and to arrange the experiments with various combinations of independent variables. In the rotatable design, the standard error, which depends on the coordinates of the point on the response surface at whichŶ is evaluated and on the coefficients β, is the same for all points that have the same distance from the central point.These designs consist of a2
k factorial (coded to the usual ±1 notation) augmented by 2
*
k axial points (±α, 0, 0), (0, ±α, 0), (0, 0, ±α) and 2 centre points (0, 0, 0). The value of α for rotatability depends on the number of points in the factorial portion of the design, which is given in
(1)
α
=
(
N
F
)
1
/
4
,
where N
F is the number of points in the cube portion of the design (N
F
=
2
k, k is the number of factors). Since there are three factors, the N
F number is equal to 8 points, while α is equal to 1.682 according to (1). In this study, the response was reaction yield. Each response was used to develop an empirical model that correlated the response to the reaction conditions variables for synthesis of an antimycobacterial drug, using a second-degree polynomial equation as given by
(2)
Ŷ
=
β
0
+
Σ
β
i
X
i
+
Σ
β
i
i
X
i
2
+
Σ
β
i
j
X
i
X
j
,
where β
0 is the constant coefficient, β
i is the linear coefficients, β
i
j is the cross-product coefficients, and β
i
i is the quadratic coefficients. The software Statgraphics-Plus was used for the experimental design, data analysis, model building, and graph plotting.


## 3. Results and Discussion

Conjugate addition between chalcone (R1=H) and thiophenol (R=Ph) was chosen as model substrates to determine suitable reaction conditions for synthesis of 1,3-diphenyl-3-phenylsulfenylpropan-1-one catalyzed by CP in methanol at room temperature.Preliminary experiments were carried out to screen the appropriate parameters and to determine the experimental domain. From these experiments, the effects of catalyst weight (X
1), reaction time (X
2), and solvent volume (X
3) are investigated on reaction yield as response. The parameter levels and coded values were given in Table 1.Table 1
Study field and coded factors.
Natural variable
Unit
Coded variablesX
1, X
2, and X
3
−1
0
+1
Catalyst weight
mg
40
120
200
Reaction time
min
20
30
40
Solvent volume
mL
1
2
3The experimental design matrix and the corresponding experimental parameters and response value were shown in Table2.Table 2
Experimental design and results.
Order
Coded units of variables
Reaction yield
X
1
X
2
X
3
01
+1
+1
+1
96
02
+1
+1
−1
82
03
+1
−1
+1
74
04
+1
−1
−1
68
05
−1
+1
+1
78
06
−1
+1
−1
69
07
−1
−1
+1
65
08
−1
−1
−1
57
09
−1.682
0
0
61
10
+1.682
0
0
94
11
0
−1.682
0
56
12
0
+1.682
0
93
13
0
0
−1.682
77
14
0
0
+1.682
92
15
0
0
0
94
16
0
0
0
93The 10 coefficients of this design are easily calculated by the least squares method. The significance of effects can be estimated by comparing theF distribution of the experimental values (F
exp
⁡) to a critical value (F
0.05
(
1.6
)
=
5.99). According to the results showed in Table 3.Table 3
Estimated coefficients of the model and their significances.
Source of variation
Coefficient
Sum of squares
ν
Mean square
F
exp
⁡
Significance test
β
0
93.9167
—
1
—
—
β
1
07.7982
0830.504
1
0830.504
34.87
*
β
2
09.0230
1111.880
1
1111.880
46.68
*
β
3
04.5565
0283.534
1
0283.534
11.90
*
β
11
−06.6629
0411.269
1
0411.269
17.27
*
β
12
01.3750
0015.125
1
0015.125
00.63
NS
β
13
00.3750
0001.125
1
0001.125
00.05
NS
β
22
−07.7235
0552.631
1
0552.631
23.20
*
β
23
01.1250
0010.125
1
0010.125
00.43
NS
β
33
−04.1880
0162.485
1
0162.485
06.82
*
*Significant at a level of 5%; NS: not significant.In this case, the linear terms (X
1, X
2, and X
3) and the squared terms (X
1
2, X
2
2, and X
3
2) were significant model terms whereas the interaction terms (X
1
X
2, X
1
X
3, and X
2
X
3) were insignificant to the response. The final empirical model in terms of coded factors after excluding the insignificant terms for reaction yield is shown in
(3)
Y
=
93.9167
+
7.7982
*
X
1
+
9.023
*
X
2
+
4.5565
*
X
3
-
6.6629
*
X
1
2
-
7.7235
*
X
2
2
-
4.188
*
X
3
2
.
Positive sign in front of the terms indicates synergistic effect, whereas negative sign indicates antagonistic effect.The analysis of variance (ANOVA) for model of the reaction yield is listed in Table4. From this ANOVA, the value of the Model F
exp
⁡ was 13.6956 (>F0.01
(
9.6
)
=
7.98) implying that the model was significant.Table 4
Regression variance analysis for the model.
Source of variation
Sum of squares
ν
Mean square
F
exp
⁡
Significance test
Regression
2936.022
9
326.2246
13.6956
*
Residue
142.918
6
23.8196
—
—
Total
3078.94
15
—
—
—
*Significant at a level of 1%; NS: not significant.The quality of the model developed was evaluated based on the correlation coefficient value (R). The R value for (3) was 0.9765. The R value obtained was relatively high, indicating that there was a good agreement between the experimental and the predicted values from the model.TheR
2 value for (3) was 0.9536. This indicated that 95.36% of the total variation in the reaction yield was attributed to the experimental variables studied. From the statistical results obtained, it was shown that the above model was adequate to predict the reaction yield within the range of variables studied.The investigation of (3) showed that, if X
1
=
0.5, X
2
=
0, and X
3
=
-
0.25, the value predicted from the results using response surface model is 95%. The experimental checking in this point, that is, under the optimum reaction conditions such as catalyst weight
=
160 mg, reaction time
=
30 min, and solvent volume
=
1.75 mL with high reaction yield 94% of product3a, confirms this result.To determine the scope and limitation for synthesis ofβ-mercapto carbonyl derivatives, the optimum reaction conditions of product3a were applied to other substrates as shown in Table 5.Table 5
Synthesis of sulfanyl derivatives.
Products
R
1
R
Yield %
3a
H
–Ph
94
3b
Cl
–Ph
96
3c
OMe
–Ph
77
3d
H
–2-NH2-Ph
93
3e
Cl
–2-NH2-Ph
95
3f
OMe
–2-NH2-Ph
92In this study, the Thia-Michael reaction between several chalcones and thiols has been used for synthesis ofβ-mercapto carbonyl derivatives.The yields obtained ofβ-mercapto carbonyl derivatives are very high and exceed 92% in short reaction time, except for product (3c). The products of undesirable side reactions resulting from 1, 2 addition, polymerization, and bis-addition are not observed. The use of CP catalyst is particularly interesting since it is regenerated by calcinations at 750°C during 15 min, and after five successive recoveries, sulfanyl products were obtained with same yield.


## 4. Conclusion

In conclusion, the optimization of reaction conditions for synthesis ofβ-mercapto carbonyl derivatives catalyzed by calcium pyrophosphate has been studied using central composite design. This work-up procedure provides a clean, fast, high yielded, environmentally friendly, and simple route to synthesis of antimycobacterial drugs.



---

*Source: 586437-2014-03-06.xml*