# Synthesis and Performance of Functionalizedα-Zirconium Phosphate Modified with Octadecyl Isocyanate

Authors: Lijuan Han; Qingyuan Chen; Hong Chen; Shang Yu; Lin Xiao; Zhongbin Ye
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

Theα-zirconium phosphate (α-ZrP) and hydrophobically modified α-zirconium phosphate (α-ZrP-I) were prepared. The grafting of octadecyl isocyanate was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The dispersion of α-ZrP-I was studied by environmental scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The wettability of α-ZrP-I was determined by Kruss DSA30. Then, the effects of decompression and augmented injection of α-ZrP-I have been studied. The results of water flooding experiments show that the appropriate concentration of α-ZrP-I has an effect on the decrease of the water injection pressure.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Theα-zirconium phosphate, α-ZrP (HPO4)2·H2O, with its layer spacing of 0.76 nm, is a structured cationic layered compound with a monoclinic system. Its crystal structure is the lamellar composed of octahedral ZrO6 and tetrahedral HPO4 alternately. Due to the molecular structure of α-zirconium phosphate, it is possible for α-ZrP and its derivatives to become excellent matrix of intercalated compounds, pillared catalysts and polymers, and layered inorganic nanocomposites. And these materials have broad applications in ion exchange, adsorption catalysis, electromagnetics, electrochemistry, photochemistry, biomedicine, environmental protection, and other fields [1–16]. There are three main methods for the preparation of α-zirconium phosphate: reflux method, direct precipitation method (fluorine coordination method), and hydrothermal method [17–20]. Among these methods, the reflux method is widely used because of its great potential for large-scale synthesis. The particle size of α-zirconium phosphate prepared by the reflux method is tiny, and colloidal particles are easy to acquire, which is beneficial to the subsequent modification process of α-zirconium phosphate.As a typical layered compound, the layer spacing ofα-zirconium phosphate can be designed and it exhibits anisotropy. The α-ZrP has good chemical activity, such as reduction reaction, polymerization, replacement reaction, stripping layer reaction, and other reactions [21–34]. Owing to the excellent properties of α-zirconium phosphate, domestic and foreign scholars have done a series of studies about α-ZrP. Intergranular protons in the α-ZrP have strong ion exchange capacity; different guest molecules can be inserted into the α-ZrP layer for intercalation. MacLachlan studied the insertion of alkylamine into α-ZrP [32]; he thought that the arrangement of different alkylamines is related to the amount of intercalation. The short chain alkylamine with a variety of permutations not only increases the alkylamine layer spacing, but also introduces hydrophobic groups, making intercalated compounds strong hydrophobicity. For some organic molecules that could not be directly inserted into α-ZrP, they can be intercalated by alkylamine and then introduced into the interlayer with alkylamine. Octadecyltrichlorosilane could be grafted onto the surface of α-ZrP through the P-OH group reaction. The surface of α-ZrP modified by hydrophobic long chains will exhibit strong hydrophobicity. The application of modified α-ZrP products in photo-induced electron transfer reactions in nonpolar solvents also has been studied.With the development of oil and gas exploitation, many middle- and high-permeability reservoirs have been in medium or high water level development stage. As a result, the low-permeability reservoirs will be the major resource. But the development of low-permeability reservoirs was limited by their poor properties and poor injection production connectivity, which rapidly increases water injection pressure and dramatically decreases water intake capacity during the water flooding process. In order to reduce water injection pressure and increase water injection volume, the flow resistance during water flooding should be reduced.The strong hydrophobic nanomaterials have the ability to make the surface wettability of the rock formation transform from hydrophilicity to hydrophobicity and then the subsequent injected water flows on the nanoadsorption layer. The contact angles of the core with water before and after the treatment by the nanomaterials could confirm the change of the wettability of the core surface. In accordance with the mechanism of nanoslippage effect, it is considered that the nanomaterials have strong surface activity, and they perform competition adsorption with water molecules on the wall of the micropore. Nanomaterials will replace the original hydration layer to form a molecular adsorption layer with superhydrophobic properties and nanoscale [35, 36]. When the water flows through the adsorption layer, the nanoslippage effect generates, which helps to expand the effective pore size and reduce flow resistance.Hydrophobicα-ZrP nanomaterial may exhibit a significant effect on decompression and augmented injection and can be used for low-permeability reservoir water flooding development. In this paper, α-ZrP was prepared by the reflux method, and then the α-ZrP was modified by octadecyl isocyanate to obtain the hydrophobically modified product α-ZrP-I. The performance of α-ZrP-I as a drag reducer was evaluated. The experiment results show that α-ZrP-I has good performance in drag reduction, which has potential applications in low-permeability reservoirs.


## 2. Materials and Method

### 2.1. Materials

Zirconium oxychloride, concentrated phosphoric acid, octadecyl isocyanate, o-xylene, tetrahydrofuran, and methanol were purchased from Chengdu Kelong Chemical Reagent Company, China.


### 2.2. Preparation ofα-ZrP and α-ZrP-I

Theα-ZrP was prepared by the reflux method. The concentrated phosphoric acid was first diluted to 11 mol l−1. Then, 3.22 g Zirconium oxychloride ZrOCl2·8H2O was dissolved in deionized water and slowly dropped into the continuously stirred phosphoric acid solution which was about 40 ml. The mixture system would be refluxed under 100°C for 24 hours. Finally, the product would be filtered and washed repeatedly with deionized water several times to remove unreacted phosphoric acid and other impurities until the pH of the filtrate was neutral. The product was placed in a vacuum oven at 60°C for about 12 hours and then grinded into white powder.Then, 1.416 gα-ZrP was dispersed into 50 ml o-xylene in a three-necked flask and ultrasonically dispersed for 2 hours (ultrasonic power was set at 100 W). 0.150 g octadecyl isocyanate was added into the α-ZrP dispersed system (the molar ratio of ZrP to ODI is 10 : 1.) and reacted for 12 hours under the condition of nitrogen gas. Then, the mixture was centrifuged and the product was washed with methanol several times to remove impurities. The product was dried in an oven at 60°C to obtain the hydrophobically modified α-zirconium phosphate (α-ZrP-I) solid powder. The reaction scheme is shown in Figure 1.Figure 1
Scheme of hydrophobic modification ofα-zirconium phosphate.


### 2.3. Characterization

The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra ofα-ZrP and α-ZrP-I were recorded by Thermo Fisher Scientific Nicolet 6700 ranging from 800 to 4000 cm−1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were performed directly on the powder sample of α-ZrP and α-ZrP-I by using PANalytical X’Pert-Pro diffractometer (40 kV, 40 mA) with Cu (λ = 1.54 Å) irradiation at a scanning of 2°/s in the 2θ range of 4~40°, and scan compensation is 20°/min. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out with a NETZSCH simultaneous thermal analyzer model STA 449F3. The heating rate was 10°C/min. Each time about 10 mg sample was measured in an aluminum crucible under inert gas atmosphere from 40°C to 800°C. Scanning electron microcopy (SEM) measurements were implemented by a field emission scanning electron microanalyzer (FEI Quanta 450) at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV. Contact angle was determined by Kruss drop shape analyzer model DSA30.


### 2.4. Evaluation of Core Flooding Experiment

All the displacement experiments were conducted through multifunctional chemical flooding physical simulation system (Haian Oil Scientific Research Apparatus Co. Ltd.). Schematic diagram of experiment is shown in Figure2. The pressure during the injection process was recorded. The injection rate was 0.5 ml/min. The detailed process is as follows:
(1)
Put the core into the core holder and inject deionized water in the core to determine the initial water-phase permeability of the core.
(2)
Displace the cores with simulated oil.
(3)
Displace the cores with deionized water again to set residual oil saturation and obtain the stable water flooding pressureP1.
(4)
Injectα-ZrP-I dispersion system, close the valve of the holder, and put it aside for 24 hours.
(5)
Do subsequent water flooding injection to obtain the stable water flooding pressureP2.Figure 2
Schematic diagram ofα-ZrP-I flooding experiment.According to the core flow experiment method, the effect ofα-ZrP-I on the development of water injection in the low-permeability core was evaluated through comparing the pressure before and after the injection of nanomaterial.


## 2.1. Materials

Zirconium oxychloride, concentrated phosphoric acid, octadecyl isocyanate, o-xylene, tetrahydrofuran, and methanol were purchased from Chengdu Kelong Chemical Reagent Company, China.


## 2.2. Preparation ofα-ZrP and α-ZrP-I

Theα-ZrP was prepared by the reflux method. The concentrated phosphoric acid was first diluted to 11 mol l−1. Then, 3.22 g Zirconium oxychloride ZrOCl2·8H2O was dissolved in deionized water and slowly dropped into the continuously stirred phosphoric acid solution which was about 40 ml. The mixture system would be refluxed under 100°C for 24 hours. Finally, the product would be filtered and washed repeatedly with deionized water several times to remove unreacted phosphoric acid and other impurities until the pH of the filtrate was neutral. The product was placed in a vacuum oven at 60°C for about 12 hours and then grinded into white powder.Then, 1.416 gα-ZrP was dispersed into 50 ml o-xylene in a three-necked flask and ultrasonically dispersed for 2 hours (ultrasonic power was set at 100 W). 0.150 g octadecyl isocyanate was added into the α-ZrP dispersed system (the molar ratio of ZrP to ODI is 10 : 1.) and reacted for 12 hours under the condition of nitrogen gas. Then, the mixture was centrifuged and the product was washed with methanol several times to remove impurities. The product was dried in an oven at 60°C to obtain the hydrophobically modified α-zirconium phosphate (α-ZrP-I) solid powder. The reaction scheme is shown in Figure 1.Figure 1
Scheme of hydrophobic modification ofα-zirconium phosphate.


## 2.3. Characterization

The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra ofα-ZrP and α-ZrP-I were recorded by Thermo Fisher Scientific Nicolet 6700 ranging from 800 to 4000 cm−1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were performed directly on the powder sample of α-ZrP and α-ZrP-I by using PANalytical X’Pert-Pro diffractometer (40 kV, 40 mA) with Cu (λ = 1.54 Å) irradiation at a scanning of 2°/s in the 2θ range of 4~40°, and scan compensation is 20°/min. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out with a NETZSCH simultaneous thermal analyzer model STA 449F3. The heating rate was 10°C/min. Each time about 10 mg sample was measured in an aluminum crucible under inert gas atmosphere from 40°C to 800°C. Scanning electron microcopy (SEM) measurements were implemented by a field emission scanning electron microanalyzer (FEI Quanta 450) at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV. Contact angle was determined by Kruss drop shape analyzer model DSA30.


## 2.4. Evaluation of Core Flooding Experiment

All the displacement experiments were conducted through multifunctional chemical flooding physical simulation system (Haian Oil Scientific Research Apparatus Co. Ltd.). Schematic diagram of experiment is shown in Figure2. The pressure during the injection process was recorded. The injection rate was 0.5 ml/min. The detailed process is as follows:
(1)
Put the core into the core holder and inject deionized water in the core to determine the initial water-phase permeability of the core.
(2)
Displace the cores with simulated oil.
(3)
Displace the cores with deionized water again to set residual oil saturation and obtain the stable water flooding pressureP1.
(4)
Injectα-ZrP-I dispersion system, close the valve of the holder, and put it aside for 24 hours.
(5)
Do subsequent water flooding injection to obtain the stable water flooding pressureP2.Figure 2
Schematic diagram ofα-ZrP-I flooding experiment.According to the core flow experiment method, the effect ofα-ZrP-I on the development of water injection in the low-permeability core was evaluated through comparing the pressure before and after the injection of nanomaterial.


## 3. Results and Discussion

The particle size ofα-zirconium phosphate is between 100 nm and 400 nm with 0.76 nm interlayer distance. The α-ZrP has good chemical activity, so it is possible to graft the organic group onto the surface of the α-zirconium phosphate crystal for the transformation of the nature of the original nanometer lamellae.In this paper, octadecyl isocyanate was utilized to modify the surface ofα-zirconium phosphate to prepare hydrophobically modified α-zirconium phosphate. The octadecyl isocyanate was grafted onto the surface and the edge of the α-zirconium phosphate sheet by chemical reaction with the -OH group on the surface.


### 3.1. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy

FTIR spectra of the originalα-ZrP and hydrophobically modified α-ZrP-I are presented in Figure 3. For the α-ZrP spectrum, there are two distinct peaks at 3590 cm−1 and 3510 cm−1, which are the asymmetric stretching vibration of the intercalated water molecules, due to the split of the position asymmetry. The characteristic peak at 3150 cm−1 is symmetric stretching vibration absorption peak of the intercalated water molecules, and the characteristic peak at 1620 cm−1 is the absorption peak caused by the deformation vibrations of the O-H bonds of the water molecules. The peak at 1250 cm−1 belongs to the out-of-plane bending vibration of P-OH. The strong absorption peak at 1000~1200 cm−1 is the stretching vibration peak of -PO4 group. The IR spectra of prepared α-ZrP are consistent with the standard α-ZrP IR spectra.Figure 3
FTIR spectra ofα-ZrP and α-ZrP-I.For theα-ZrP-I spectra, the characteristic peak emerging at 3375 cm−1 is the absorption peak of secondary amine. The strong characteristic peaks which emerge near 3000–2850 cm−1 are symmetrical and asymmetric stretching vibration peaks of methylene. Two carbonyl characteristic absorption peaks are observed, one of which is carbonyl characteristic absorption peak of aliphatic carboxyl group at 1685 cm−1, and the other one of which is carbonyl characteristic absorption peak of amide group at 1525 cm−1. Compared with the α-ZrP infrared spectra, these newly emerged peaks indicate that the octadecyl isocyanate molecules are successfully attached to the α-ZrP crystal surface. The characteristic absorption peaks of the original interlayer water molecules still exist, indicating that the intercalation reaction does not occur during the modification process. The octadecyl isocyanate does not insert into the α-ZrP crystal layer which still maintains a stable layered structure, and it only modifies the surface and the edge of the crystal.


### 3.2. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

The XRD patterns ofα-ZrP and α-ZrP-I are shown in Figure 4. The results of spectra analysis of α-ZrP-I remain the same as that of α-ZrP without obvious difference. There are three main strong diffraction peaks at 11.6°, 19.7°, and 24.9°, corresponding to the characteristic diffraction peaks of d (002), d (110), and d (112), respectively. The first characteristic peak represents the 002 crystal plane of α-ZrP with its interlayer spacing of 0.76 nm, which indicates that the layer interval of α-ZrP keeps unchanged after hydrophobic modification, that is, the octadecyl isocyanate does not insert into crystal layer of α-ZrP during surface modification process.Figure 4
XRD patterns ofα-ZrP and α-ZrP-I.


### 3.3. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

Figure5 shows the TGA curves of α-ZrP and α-ZrP-I. Below 200°C, α-ZrP exhibits a weight loss of about 6%; it is attributed to the loss of the first level of interlayer crystallization water and the production of α-Zr (HPO4)2. The α-ZrP begins to ongoing condensation reaction at about 500°C. There is the same mass loss in second-level process at 500°C~600°C, which is caused by the dehydration condensation reaction of P-OH of α-Zr (HPO4)2 layer structure which generates ZrP2O7. The decomposition temperature is relatively high, indicating that α-ZrP could well maintain the layered structure and has good thermal stability.Figure 5
TGA curves ofα-ZrP and α-ZrP-I.The TGA curve ofα-ZrP-I basically appears four stages. The first stage ranges from 40°C to 100°C, which the residual adsorbed solvent molecules on the prepared α-ZrP-I surface are heated and volatilized. The second temperature stage is within 100°C to 200°C, which the interlayer crystal water molecules are removed for heated and the weight loss is about 6%. This is consistent with the result of TGA of α-ZrP at 200°C. The temperature range from 200°C to 330°C signifies the third stage. The weight loss of the modified product α-ZrP-I in this stage is greater than the two stages mentioned above, as the organic aliphatic hydrocarbon chain on the surface begins to be decomposed when heated. Organic long-chain alkyl falls off from α-ZrP surface until the organic modifier has been fully decomposed at around 350°C. The last weight loss stage of α-ZrP-I is within the range from 505°C to 600°C for the P-OH dehydration condensation process, which is consistent with that of α-ZrP. The differences of TGA curves of α-ZrP-I and α-ZrP indicate that octadecyl isocyanate is successfully attached to the surface or edge of the α-ZrP.


### 3.4. Scanning Electron Microcopy (SEM)

The SEM test can visually reflect the morphology and the dispersion state of the particles in the dispersant. SEM images of the powder ofα-ZrP and α-ZrP-I are also obtained and shown in Figure 6. It can be seen that the particle size of α-ZrP is about 100~400 nm.Figure 6
SEM images ofα-ZrP.
(a)
(b)When the hydrophobic nanomaterialα-ZrP-I is dispersed in tetrahydrofuran, SEM images are obtained and shown in Figure 7 after dispersion system being freeze-dried with liquid nitrogen and then gold sputtered. From Figure 7, it can be seen that the agglomeration of hydrophobic α-ZrP-I increases when the concentration of α-ZrP-I increases. Figure 7(a) shows that the α-ZrP-I nanoparticles could be well dispersed in tetrahydrofuran, and the particle size is less than 100 nm. Figure 7(c) shows a significant aggregation phenomenon when the concentration of α-ZrP-I nanoparticle dispersion system is 200 mg/l.Figure 7
SEM images ofα-ZrP-I: (a) 50 mg/l, (b) 100 mg/l, and (c) 200 mg/l.
(a)
(b)
(c)


### 3.5. Evaluation of Wettability of Nanomaterial

The wettability of the nanometer material ofα-ZrP-I is evaluated, and the results are shown in Figure 8. The surfaces of the hydrophilic core slices are polished with sandpaper and then soaked in tetrahydrofuran dispersion systems of α-ZrP-I with the concentrations of 10 mg/l, 20 mg/l, 50 mg/l, 100 mg/l, and 200 mg/l, respectively. The dispersion is then heated and volatilized, depositing α-ZrP-I on the slice of the core. The core slice which has not been processed by α-ZrP-I nanomaterial exhibited strong hydrophilicity. The water droplet spreads rapidly as soon as it contacts the surface of the core due to the capillarity phenomenon. The contact angle of the core with water can be considered as 0°. When soaked in the α-ZrP-I dispersion systems at the concentration of 10 mg/l and 20 mg/l, respectively, the contact angles of the core slices with water are less than 90°. When soaked in the dispersion systems at concentration higher than 50 mg/l, the contact angles of the core slices with water are greater than 90°. With the increase of concentration of the α-ZrP-I nanomaterial, the core surface is covered by more nanomaterial molecules, so the water droplet will contact with more hydrophobic groups and appear in the shape of a ball under the energy minimization and gravity, which accounts for the phenomenon that the wettability of the core surface changes from hydrophilic into hydrophobic.Figure 8
Contact angle on the surface of the core.


### 3.6. Evaluation of Core Flooding Experiment

The ability of decompression and augmented injection of nanoparticle dispersion system with different concentrations are evaluated by the self-made low-permeability core. The experimental parameters are shown in Table1. The experiment is carried out at 30°C. The pressure P1 and P2 before and after the injection of α-ZrP-I nanometer material dispersion system are recorded, and the water-phase permeability K1 and K2 are calculated according to the Darcy formula, which are shown in Table 2 and Figure 9.Table 1
Parameters of the cores and experiment.
Number
Size (cm)
Pore volume (ml)
Porosity (%)
Permeability (×10−3 μm2)
Injection rate (ml/min)
Concentration (mg/l)
Injection pore volume (PV)
Time (h)
1
Φ2.5 × 6.4
6.2
19.7
22.3
0.5
20
2
24
2
6.3
20.0
16.7
50
3
6.0
19.1
21.4
100
4
6.1
19.4
15.5
200Table 2
Pressure and permeability before and afterα-ZrP-I injection.
Number
Concentration (mg/l)
P1 (MPa)
P2 (MPa)
K1 (×10−3 μm2)
K2 (×10−3 μm2)
Pressure drop rate (%)
K2/K1
1
20
0.3527
0.3348
3.08
3.25
0.05
1.05
2
50
0.3614
0.1907
3.01
5.70
47.23
1.89
3
100
0.3703
0.4006
2.93
2.71
−8.18
0.92
4
200
0.2815
0.5024
3.86
2.16
−78.47
0.56Figure 9
Pressure before and afterα-ZrP-I injection.From Figure9, it can be seen that the injection pressure after α-ZrP-I injection decreases at first and then increases with the increase of the concentration of α-ZrP-I. When the injected concentration of α-ZrP-I is low, the surface of the rock could not be able to form an effective adsorption layer. Therefore, nanoslip impact is not obvious and the injection pressure has a little change. As the concentration of α-ZrP-I increases to 50 mg/l, the pressure drop rate is up to 47.23% and water permeability increased to 1.89 times. The flow resistance is lowered through the slippage effect, which will play an important role in reducing the injection pressure. However, when the concentration of α-ZrP-I nano dispersion system exceeds a certain value, the nanoparticles will aggregate on the surface of the rock, which will not contribute to the decompression and augmented injection effect and will increase the injection pressure. When the concentration of α-ZrP-I is more than 100 mg/l, the depressurization effect disappears. The results of the experiments in this paper show that 50 mg/l is the best concentration for α-ZrP-I in decompression and augmented injection. Therefore, the concentration of α-ZrP-I is crucial for decompression and augmented injection effect, which should be controlled within the appropriate range.


## 3.1. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy

FTIR spectra of the originalα-ZrP and hydrophobically modified α-ZrP-I are presented in Figure 3. For the α-ZrP spectrum, there are two distinct peaks at 3590 cm−1 and 3510 cm−1, which are the asymmetric stretching vibration of the intercalated water molecules, due to the split of the position asymmetry. The characteristic peak at 3150 cm−1 is symmetric stretching vibration absorption peak of the intercalated water molecules, and the characteristic peak at 1620 cm−1 is the absorption peak caused by the deformation vibrations of the O-H bonds of the water molecules. The peak at 1250 cm−1 belongs to the out-of-plane bending vibration of P-OH. The strong absorption peak at 1000~1200 cm−1 is the stretching vibration peak of -PO4 group. The IR spectra of prepared α-ZrP are consistent with the standard α-ZrP IR spectra.Figure 3
FTIR spectra ofα-ZrP and α-ZrP-I.For theα-ZrP-I spectra, the characteristic peak emerging at 3375 cm−1 is the absorption peak of secondary amine. The strong characteristic peaks which emerge near 3000–2850 cm−1 are symmetrical and asymmetric stretching vibration peaks of methylene. Two carbonyl characteristic absorption peaks are observed, one of which is carbonyl characteristic absorption peak of aliphatic carboxyl group at 1685 cm−1, and the other one of which is carbonyl characteristic absorption peak of amide group at 1525 cm−1. Compared with the α-ZrP infrared spectra, these newly emerged peaks indicate that the octadecyl isocyanate molecules are successfully attached to the α-ZrP crystal surface. The characteristic absorption peaks of the original interlayer water molecules still exist, indicating that the intercalation reaction does not occur during the modification process. The octadecyl isocyanate does not insert into the α-ZrP crystal layer which still maintains a stable layered structure, and it only modifies the surface and the edge of the crystal.


## 3.2. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

The XRD patterns ofα-ZrP and α-ZrP-I are shown in Figure 4. The results of spectra analysis of α-ZrP-I remain the same as that of α-ZrP without obvious difference. There are three main strong diffraction peaks at 11.6°, 19.7°, and 24.9°, corresponding to the characteristic diffraction peaks of d (002), d (110), and d (112), respectively. The first characteristic peak represents the 002 crystal plane of α-ZrP with its interlayer spacing of 0.76 nm, which indicates that the layer interval of α-ZrP keeps unchanged after hydrophobic modification, that is, the octadecyl isocyanate does not insert into crystal layer of α-ZrP during surface modification process.Figure 4
XRD patterns ofα-ZrP and α-ZrP-I.


## 3.3. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

Figure5 shows the TGA curves of α-ZrP and α-ZrP-I. Below 200°C, α-ZrP exhibits a weight loss of about 6%; it is attributed to the loss of the first level of interlayer crystallization water and the production of α-Zr (HPO4)2. The α-ZrP begins to ongoing condensation reaction at about 500°C. There is the same mass loss in second-level process at 500°C~600°C, which is caused by the dehydration condensation reaction of P-OH of α-Zr (HPO4)2 layer structure which generates ZrP2O7. The decomposition temperature is relatively high, indicating that α-ZrP could well maintain the layered structure and has good thermal stability.Figure 5
TGA curves ofα-ZrP and α-ZrP-I.The TGA curve ofα-ZrP-I basically appears four stages. The first stage ranges from 40°C to 100°C, which the residual adsorbed solvent molecules on the prepared α-ZrP-I surface are heated and volatilized. The second temperature stage is within 100°C to 200°C, which the interlayer crystal water molecules are removed for heated and the weight loss is about 6%. This is consistent with the result of TGA of α-ZrP at 200°C. The temperature range from 200°C to 330°C signifies the third stage. The weight loss of the modified product α-ZrP-I in this stage is greater than the two stages mentioned above, as the organic aliphatic hydrocarbon chain on the surface begins to be decomposed when heated. Organic long-chain alkyl falls off from α-ZrP surface until the organic modifier has been fully decomposed at around 350°C. The last weight loss stage of α-ZrP-I is within the range from 505°C to 600°C for the P-OH dehydration condensation process, which is consistent with that of α-ZrP. The differences of TGA curves of α-ZrP-I and α-ZrP indicate that octadecyl isocyanate is successfully attached to the surface or edge of the α-ZrP.


## 3.4. Scanning Electron Microcopy (SEM)

The SEM test can visually reflect the morphology and the dispersion state of the particles in the dispersant. SEM images of the powder ofα-ZrP and α-ZrP-I are also obtained and shown in Figure 6. It can be seen that the particle size of α-ZrP is about 100~400 nm.Figure 6
SEM images ofα-ZrP.
(a)
(b)When the hydrophobic nanomaterialα-ZrP-I is dispersed in tetrahydrofuran, SEM images are obtained and shown in Figure 7 after dispersion system being freeze-dried with liquid nitrogen and then gold sputtered. From Figure 7, it can be seen that the agglomeration of hydrophobic α-ZrP-I increases when the concentration of α-ZrP-I increases. Figure 7(a) shows that the α-ZrP-I nanoparticles could be well dispersed in tetrahydrofuran, and the particle size is less than 100 nm. Figure 7(c) shows a significant aggregation phenomenon when the concentration of α-ZrP-I nanoparticle dispersion system is 200 mg/l.Figure 7
SEM images ofα-ZrP-I: (a) 50 mg/l, (b) 100 mg/l, and (c) 200 mg/l.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.5. Evaluation of Wettability of Nanomaterial

The wettability of the nanometer material ofα-ZrP-I is evaluated, and the results are shown in Figure 8. The surfaces of the hydrophilic core slices are polished with sandpaper and then soaked in tetrahydrofuran dispersion systems of α-ZrP-I with the concentrations of 10 mg/l, 20 mg/l, 50 mg/l, 100 mg/l, and 200 mg/l, respectively. The dispersion is then heated and volatilized, depositing α-ZrP-I on the slice of the core. The core slice which has not been processed by α-ZrP-I nanomaterial exhibited strong hydrophilicity. The water droplet spreads rapidly as soon as it contacts the surface of the core due to the capillarity phenomenon. The contact angle of the core with water can be considered as 0°. When soaked in the α-ZrP-I dispersion systems at the concentration of 10 mg/l and 20 mg/l, respectively, the contact angles of the core slices with water are less than 90°. When soaked in the dispersion systems at concentration higher than 50 mg/l, the contact angles of the core slices with water are greater than 90°. With the increase of concentration of the α-ZrP-I nanomaterial, the core surface is covered by more nanomaterial molecules, so the water droplet will contact with more hydrophobic groups and appear in the shape of a ball under the energy minimization and gravity, which accounts for the phenomenon that the wettability of the core surface changes from hydrophilic into hydrophobic.Figure 8
Contact angle on the surface of the core.


## 3.6. Evaluation of Core Flooding Experiment

The ability of decompression and augmented injection of nanoparticle dispersion system with different concentrations are evaluated by the self-made low-permeability core. The experimental parameters are shown in Table1. The experiment is carried out at 30°C. The pressure P1 and P2 before and after the injection of α-ZrP-I nanometer material dispersion system are recorded, and the water-phase permeability K1 and K2 are calculated according to the Darcy formula, which are shown in Table 2 and Figure 9.Table 1
Parameters of the cores and experiment.
Number
Size (cm)
Pore volume (ml)
Porosity (%)
Permeability (×10−3 μm2)
Injection rate (ml/min)
Concentration (mg/l)
Injection pore volume (PV)
Time (h)
1
Φ2.5 × 6.4
6.2
19.7
22.3
0.5
20
2
24
2
6.3
20.0
16.7
50
3
6.0
19.1
21.4
100
4
6.1
19.4
15.5
200Table 2
Pressure and permeability before and afterα-ZrP-I injection.
Number
Concentration (mg/l)
P1 (MPa)
P2 (MPa)
K1 (×10−3 μm2)
K2 (×10−3 μm2)
Pressure drop rate (%)
K2/K1
1
20
0.3527
0.3348
3.08
3.25
0.05
1.05
2
50
0.3614
0.1907
3.01
5.70
47.23
1.89
3
100
0.3703
0.4006
2.93
2.71
−8.18
0.92
4
200
0.2815
0.5024
3.86
2.16
−78.47
0.56Figure 9
Pressure before and afterα-ZrP-I injection.From Figure9, it can be seen that the injection pressure after α-ZrP-I injection decreases at first and then increases with the increase of the concentration of α-ZrP-I. When the injected concentration of α-ZrP-I is low, the surface of the rock could not be able to form an effective adsorption layer. Therefore, nanoslip impact is not obvious and the injection pressure has a little change. As the concentration of α-ZrP-I increases to 50 mg/l, the pressure drop rate is up to 47.23% and water permeability increased to 1.89 times. The flow resistance is lowered through the slippage effect, which will play an important role in reducing the injection pressure. However, when the concentration of α-ZrP-I nano dispersion system exceeds a certain value, the nanoparticles will aggregate on the surface of the rock, which will not contribute to the decompression and augmented injection effect and will increase the injection pressure. When the concentration of α-ZrP-I is more than 100 mg/l, the depressurization effect disappears. The results of the experiments in this paper show that 50 mg/l is the best concentration for α-ZrP-I in decompression and augmented injection. Therefore, the concentration of α-ZrP-I is crucial for decompression and augmented injection effect, which should be controlled within the appropriate range.


## 4. Conclusion

In this paper,α-ZrP was prepared by the reflux method and then was modified by octadecyl isocyanate to prepare hydrophobically modified α-ZrP. FTIR, XRD, and TGA measurements were utilized, and the results indicated that the octadecyl isocyanate molecules were successfully attached to the α-ZrP crystal surface. SEM images show the morphology and the dispersion states of α-ZrP-I particles in the dispersant. The α-ZrP-I could be well dispersed at lower concentration, while the increase of concentration would result in the agglomeration phenomenon. The results of contact angle measurements demonstrate that the higher the concentration of α-ZrP-I, the greater the contact angle, and the stronger the hydrophobicity of the core slice. The results of water flooding experiments indicate that appropriate concentration of α-ZrP-I has positive effect on decompression and augmented injection. The results of this paper may lay a firm foundation for further industrial applications of α-ZrP and its derivatives in oilfield exploitation.



---

*Source: 5873871-2018-06-24.xml*