# Combustion and Mechanical Properties of Polymer-Modified Cement Mortar at High Temperature

Authors: Hyung-Jun Kim; Won-Jun Park
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

Although polymer-modified cement mortar (PCM) has been extensively used as finishing and repairing material, it is necessary to understand its combustion properties and mechanical properties at high temperature. This study evaluated the combustion characteristics with varying experimental parameters such as polymer type, unit polymer content, polymer-cement ratio, and thickness of the specimen. This study also evaluated the compressive strength and elastic modulus of PCMs with focus on the effects of the type of polymer, unit polymer content, and polymer-cement ratio. As a result, the incombustibility of the PCM was in the following order: SBR < VVA < EVA. After heating end, the mass loss rate of the PCM was less than 30%, regardless of the polymer type, unit polymer content, and W/C. In heat release rate test, the higher the unit polymer content, the greater the total heat release, regardless of the difference in W/C. The PAE series showed excellent fire resistance in the temperature range of 200~400°C. PCMs with a unit polymer content of 5%, modified with EVA and PAE, showed outstanding compressive strength at 200~400°C. At elevated temperature, the modulus of elasticity of PCM declined with an increase in the unit polymer content, regardless of the polymer type.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Repair and strengthening are necessary to extend the service life of existing buildings. Polymer-modified cement mortar (PCM) has been extensively used for repairing works because PCM has superior performances as a high-performance material, particularly for finishing and repairing works in concrete buildings [1–4]. PCMs are also commonly used in civil infrastructures, bridges, external wall insulation mortar, self–leveling mortar, and concrete repaired fields due to their excellent strength, environmental protection, adhesion, waterproofing, resistance to chemical attack, and workability [5–8]. Additionally, PCM has outstanding performance compared to ordinary mortar as concrete repair materials in case of applying them to deteriorated reinforced concrete structure [9–12]. However, it is very difficult to choose the appropriate patch repair materials due to insufficient experimental data on the fire resistance and safety of the PCM [12, 13]. With the increasingly widespread use of PCM in buildings, concern has developed regarding the behavior of this material in the case of fire because PCM is generally combustible and susceptible to deterioration of the mechanical and bonding properties at elevated temperature [12–14]. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify its behavior at high temperature upon exposure to fire; however, insufficient data are available in this regard [14–16]. To meet fire endurance requirements, the performance of these materials at elevated temperature must be understood based on assessment to the mechanical properties [14]. However, when repair is required, it is very difficult to select the appropriate patch repair materials because of insufficient experimental data on the fire resistance and safety of PCM [7–9].As PCM contains an organic polymer, it is necessary to understand its combustion properties and mechanical properties at high temperature such as those encountered during fires, for which there is not sufficient available data. Conventional technologies and existing studies are mainly focusing on the mechanical properties such as adhesion and compressive strength, mix proportions of PCM, and durability for use before repairing and after repairing using PCMs in concrete structure.This study evaluated the combustion characteristics of PCM by means of cone calorimeter, noncombustibility, and flammability tests with varying experimental parameters such as polymer type, unit polymer content, polymer-cement ratio, and thickness of the specimen. The effects of polymer type, unit polymer content, and water-cement ratio (W/C) were evaluated from the results of the above-mentioned tests. In addition, ignition and heat release rate tests were performed for various PCM thicknesses. Additionally, the mechanical properties of PCM are evaluated through the hot pressing test. The effect of the types of polymer and the unit polymer content are evaluated by analyzing the compressive strength and modulus of elasticity.


## 2. Experimental Procedure

This study evaluated the combustion characteristics of PCMs by means of cone calorimeter, noncombustibility, and flammability tests with varying experimental parameters such as polymer type, unit polymer content, polymer-cement ratio, and thickness of the specimen [15, 16]. This study also evaluated the compressive strength and elastic modulus of PCMs containing four types of polymers (ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA), vinyl acetate-vinyl versatate (VVA), styrene butadiene rubber (SBR), and polyacrylic ester (PAE)) with focus on the effects of the type of polymer, unit polymer content, and polymer-cement ratio.


### 2.1. Combustion Properties of PCM

#### 2.1.1. Materials and Composition

Portland cement and fine aggregate (fineness modulus 2.97, density 2.63 g/cm3, and water absorption 1.81%) were used to produce the mortar. Polymers specified in JIS A 6203 (polymer dispersions and redispersible polymer powders for cement modifiers), EVA, VVA, PAE, and SBR were used for cement modifiers. Meanwhile, 1% of a blowing agent was added to the redispersible polymer powders. 1% of the blowing agent was added to the polymer dispersion at different total solid ratios. Sixty compositions were used for the tests, with a fixed cement-fine aggregate (mass ratio of 1 : 3) and various polymer types, polymer amounts, and W/C values. In this study, the amount of the polymer is expressed as weight per unit volume. For example, 10 kg/m3 of the unit polymer weight in the PCM composition corresponds to 2% polymer-cement ratio. Flat specimens (100 × 100 × 10 (mm)) were used for the heat release rate tests and cylindrical specimens (diameter 44 × 50 (mm)) were used for the noncombustibility tests. The 100 × 100 × 400 (mm) specimen used for the ignition test was cut into three types of test pieces, 100 × 100 × 10 (mm), 100 × 100 × 30 (mm), and 100 × 100 × 50 (mm), after water curing (20°C) for four weeks. The physical properties of the polymers used are presented in Table 1. Table 2 shows the PCM composition and experimental parameters. All the specimens were cured for four weeks in water at 20°C and then subjected to air curing at 20°C and 60% RH for nine weeks. Finally, the samples were dried at 60°C and cooled to room temperature in a desiccator for three days before testing. Two specimens with 0.5%–2.0% water absorption were subjected to the heat release rate and ignition tests. Three specimens with 2.0%–4.0% water absorption were subjected to the noncombustibility test.Table 1
Physical properties of polymers.
Type of polymer
Volatile portion (%)
Particle diameter∗ (%)
Acid value(mgKOH/mg)
Apparent density(g/mL)
EVA
Less than 2.0
Less than 2.0
Less than 2.0
0.50 ± 0.10
VVA
Less than 2.0
Less than 2.0
Less than 2.0
0.53 ± 0.10
PAE
Less than 2.0
Less than 2.0
Less than 2.0
0.50 ± 0.10
Polymer dispersion
Solid ratio(%)
pH(20°C)
Viscosity(mPa·s)
Density(g/mL)
SBR
44.6
8.0–9.0
500–1500
1.0
∗Residual mass ratio after passing through a 300 μm sieve.Table 2
PCM composition.
Type of polymer
Polymer content(kg/m3)
Mortar flow (mm)
W/C45%
W/C 50%
W/C60%
10 (mm)
30 (mm)
50 (mm)
None∗
0
113
150
159
159
195
EVA
10
118
166
215
20
128
180
158
158
213
30
140
183
225
40
138
190
215
50
153
160
182
182
193
75
169
100
148
168
172
172
198
VVA
10
185
20
145
185
213
30
190
40
185
50
195
100
180
SBR
10
183
20
155
180
180
180
228
30
195
40
197
50
223
223
223
75
—
100
—
—
—
PAE
10
190
20
177
30
191
40
193
50
190
75
203
100
208
∗Without polymer addition; blank implies no parameter; em dash implies that measurement was impossible.


#### 2.1.2. Test Methods

The heat release rate test was conducted according to ISO 5660-1 (Cone Calorimeter Standard Test Method) [17]. The source of ignition was an electric spark generated by a cone-type electric. The heat release amount and heat release rate were measured by oxygen-consumption calorimetry [15–17]. An incombustible material shows a total calorific value of less than 8 MJ/m2 for 20 min after heating and a maximum heat release rate of less than 200 kW/m2 for 10 s continuously. In addition, such a material is devoid of cracks or holes on the surface, which render it hazardous when used as a fire retardant. Noncombustibility tests were conducted according to ISO 1182 (reaction to fire tests for building products: noncombustibility test) [18]. The temperature of the heating furnace and weight change of the specimen were measured. As part of the test procedure, a cylindrical specimen was placed in a heating furnace at 750°C, and the temperature increase inside the furnace was measured.As an important requirement in the noncombustibility test, the difference between the temperature of the incombustible material and the maximum temperature inside the furnace must be 20°C within 20 minutes after heating is commenced, and the average temperature 1 min after heating is ceased must be less than 20°C, with less than 30% weight loss of the specimen.Moreover, as a mortar contains water and is hence not a uniform material, more than 20 min would be necessary to stabilize the temperature inside the furnace. In this study, the heating time was set as 30 min from the preliminary experiment. In addition, some specimens (unit polymer content: more than 50 kg/m3) that could undergo ignition or spalling were tested by JIS A 9523 (loose fill thermal insulation materials) in the preliminary experiment [19]. The temperatures of the sample and interior of the furnace were measured using a K-type thermoelectric couple installed at both inside and outside of specimen. Figure 1 shows the setup for the flammability and temperature measurement tests.Figure 1
Flammability test and temperature measurement test.


### 2.2. Mechanical Properties of PCM

#### 2.2.1. Materials and Composition

The mortar specimen for mechanical property test contained the same materials as shown in Table1. The experimental parameters and PCM composition were adjusted based on the polymer type, polymer-cement ratio, and hot pressing test, as summarized in Table 3. Four proportions were used for the tests with a fixed water-cement ratio of 50. In this study, the amount of polymer is presented as the weight per unit volume, where 10 kg·m−3 unit polymer weight in the PCM composition corresponds to a polymer-cement ratio of 2%.Table 3
Composition of PCM mixtures.
Type of polymer
Polymer-cement ratio(%)
Water-cement ratio (%)
Air content(%)
Flow(mm)
None∗
0
50
4.9
171
EVA
5
50
6.2
207
10
7.6
217
20
8.7
222
VVA
5
50
7.7
193
10
7.6
201
20
7.7
205
PAE
5
50
6.8
194
10
8.2
203
20
9.2
224
∗Without polymer addition.The specimens for the compressive strength test and the elastic modulus test were cylindrical (100 mm in diameter and 200 mm in height) and more than three specimens were prepared for each test. The results presented hereinafter are averages. Each specimen was cured under conditions of 90% relative humidity at 20°C for fourteen days. All specimens were dried under conditions of 60% relative humidity at 20°C for sixty-three days. Finally, all specimens were dried in an oven at 60°C for seven days and were kept in a desiccator. Using these procedures, the water absorption rate for each specimen was controlled in range of 1.5~2.0%.


#### 2.2.2. Test Methods

A hot pressing test method was used to evaluate the mechanical properties of PCM at elevated temperature. As illustrated in Figure2, five thermocouples were placed into the specimen to measure the temperature changes. Each specimen was placed in the heating furnace for the hot pressing test, as shown in Figure 3. Based on previous data, the rate and amount of heat released from PCM depended on the polymer content regardless of the W/C. In this study, the amount of heat released followed the order VVA < EVA < PAE < SBR. This indicated that PCM modified with VVA and EVA at polymer contents of less than 75 kg·m−3 and PCM with PAE at a polymer content of less than 30 kg·m−3 meet the requirements as incombustible materials.Figure 2
Setup for temperature measurement of PCM.
(a)
Thermocouple
(b)
Heating furnaceFigure 3
Setup for heating compression test.In the conventional test method at a heating rate of 150°C·h−1, the specimen generated spalling after 3 h of heating with a water absorption rate of 3%. In this study, the water absorption rate was controlled in the range of 1.5~2.0%, and all specimens were heated at a rate of 100°C·h−1.The diameter of the test specimen used in the experiment is 100 mm. As shown in Figure2(a), the thermocouples were embedded in the specimen to check the temperature of the surface, inside, and center of the specimen. When the surface of each specimen reached a predetermined temperature, the heating temperature was maintained until the center of the specimen reached the target temperature. The time for the inside and outside of the PCM to reach the same temperature depends on the heating temperature and time. The heating program used for the furnace is shown in Figure 4. Figure 4 shows the time required to reach the total internal temperature of the specimen in each heating temperature range. In this study, heating temperatures were set to 200°C, 400°C, 600°C, and 800°C. The surface temperature of each specimen reaches 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours, respectively. Thereafter, the time at which the center temperature of each specimen reaches the corresponding temperature is 3, 2, 2, and 1 hour, respectively. In the case of heating at 200°C, the time for reaching the inner and outer temperatures to 200°C was 5 hours, and for 800°C, it took 9 hours for the inner and outer temperatures to reach 800°C.Figure 4
Heating program.As it illustrated in Figure3, the compressive strength was measured after the temperature at the center of the specimen reached the target temperature.


## 2.1. Combustion Properties of PCM

### 2.1.1. Materials and Composition

Portland cement and fine aggregate (fineness modulus 2.97, density 2.63 g/cm3, and water absorption 1.81%) were used to produce the mortar. Polymers specified in JIS A 6203 (polymer dispersions and redispersible polymer powders for cement modifiers), EVA, VVA, PAE, and SBR were used for cement modifiers. Meanwhile, 1% of a blowing agent was added to the redispersible polymer powders. 1% of the blowing agent was added to the polymer dispersion at different total solid ratios. Sixty compositions were used for the tests, with a fixed cement-fine aggregate (mass ratio of 1 : 3) and various polymer types, polymer amounts, and W/C values. In this study, the amount of the polymer is expressed as weight per unit volume. For example, 10 kg/m3 of the unit polymer weight in the PCM composition corresponds to 2% polymer-cement ratio. Flat specimens (100 × 100 × 10 (mm)) were used for the heat release rate tests and cylindrical specimens (diameter 44 × 50 (mm)) were used for the noncombustibility tests. The 100 × 100 × 400 (mm) specimen used for the ignition test was cut into three types of test pieces, 100 × 100 × 10 (mm), 100 × 100 × 30 (mm), and 100 × 100 × 50 (mm), after water curing (20°C) for four weeks. The physical properties of the polymers used are presented in Table 1. Table 2 shows the PCM composition and experimental parameters. All the specimens were cured for four weeks in water at 20°C and then subjected to air curing at 20°C and 60% RH for nine weeks. Finally, the samples were dried at 60°C and cooled to room temperature in a desiccator for three days before testing. Two specimens with 0.5%–2.0% water absorption were subjected to the heat release rate and ignition tests. Three specimens with 2.0%–4.0% water absorption were subjected to the noncombustibility test.Table 1
Physical properties of polymers.
Type of polymer
Volatile portion (%)
Particle diameter∗ (%)
Acid value(mgKOH/mg)
Apparent density(g/mL)
EVA
Less than 2.0
Less than 2.0
Less than 2.0
0.50 ± 0.10
VVA
Less than 2.0
Less than 2.0
Less than 2.0
0.53 ± 0.10
PAE
Less than 2.0
Less than 2.0
Less than 2.0
0.50 ± 0.10
Polymer dispersion
Solid ratio(%)
pH(20°C)
Viscosity(mPa·s)
Density(g/mL)
SBR
44.6
8.0–9.0
500–1500
1.0
∗Residual mass ratio after passing through a 300 μm sieve.Table 2
PCM composition.
Type of polymer
Polymer content(kg/m3)
Mortar flow (mm)
W/C45%
W/C 50%
W/C60%
10 (mm)
30 (mm)
50 (mm)
None∗
0
113
150
159
159
195
EVA
10
118
166
215
20
128
180
158
158
213
30
140
183
225
40
138
190
215
50
153
160
182
182
193
75
169
100
148
168
172
172
198
VVA
10
185
20
145
185
213
30
190
40
185
50
195
100
180
SBR
10
183
20
155
180
180
180
228
30
195
40
197
50
223
223
223
75
—
100
—
—
—
PAE
10
190
20
177
30
191
40
193
50
190
75
203
100
208
∗Without polymer addition; blank implies no parameter; em dash implies that measurement was impossible.


### 2.1.2. Test Methods

The heat release rate test was conducted according to ISO 5660-1 (Cone Calorimeter Standard Test Method) [17]. The source of ignition was an electric spark generated by a cone-type electric. The heat release amount and heat release rate were measured by oxygen-consumption calorimetry [15–17]. An incombustible material shows a total calorific value of less than 8 MJ/m2 for 20 min after heating and a maximum heat release rate of less than 200 kW/m2 for 10 s continuously. In addition, such a material is devoid of cracks or holes on the surface, which render it hazardous when used as a fire retardant. Noncombustibility tests were conducted according to ISO 1182 (reaction to fire tests for building products: noncombustibility test) [18]. The temperature of the heating furnace and weight change of the specimen were measured. As part of the test procedure, a cylindrical specimen was placed in a heating furnace at 750°C, and the temperature increase inside the furnace was measured.As an important requirement in the noncombustibility test, the difference between the temperature of the incombustible material and the maximum temperature inside the furnace must be 20°C within 20 minutes after heating is commenced, and the average temperature 1 min after heating is ceased must be less than 20°C, with less than 30% weight loss of the specimen.Moreover, as a mortar contains water and is hence not a uniform material, more than 20 min would be necessary to stabilize the temperature inside the furnace. In this study, the heating time was set as 30 min from the preliminary experiment. In addition, some specimens (unit polymer content: more than 50 kg/m3) that could undergo ignition or spalling were tested by JIS A 9523 (loose fill thermal insulation materials) in the preliminary experiment [19]. The temperatures of the sample and interior of the furnace were measured using a K-type thermoelectric couple installed at both inside and outside of specimen. Figure 1 shows the setup for the flammability and temperature measurement tests.Figure 1
Flammability test and temperature measurement test.


## 2.1.1. Materials and Composition

Portland cement and fine aggregate (fineness modulus 2.97, density 2.63 g/cm3, and water absorption 1.81%) were used to produce the mortar. Polymers specified in JIS A 6203 (polymer dispersions and redispersible polymer powders for cement modifiers), EVA, VVA, PAE, and SBR were used for cement modifiers. Meanwhile, 1% of a blowing agent was added to the redispersible polymer powders. 1% of the blowing agent was added to the polymer dispersion at different total solid ratios. Sixty compositions were used for the tests, with a fixed cement-fine aggregate (mass ratio of 1 : 3) and various polymer types, polymer amounts, and W/C values. In this study, the amount of the polymer is expressed as weight per unit volume. For example, 10 kg/m3 of the unit polymer weight in the PCM composition corresponds to 2% polymer-cement ratio. Flat specimens (100 × 100 × 10 (mm)) were used for the heat release rate tests and cylindrical specimens (diameter 44 × 50 (mm)) were used for the noncombustibility tests. The 100 × 100 × 400 (mm) specimen used for the ignition test was cut into three types of test pieces, 100 × 100 × 10 (mm), 100 × 100 × 30 (mm), and 100 × 100 × 50 (mm), after water curing (20°C) for four weeks. The physical properties of the polymers used are presented in Table 1. Table 2 shows the PCM composition and experimental parameters. All the specimens were cured for four weeks in water at 20°C and then subjected to air curing at 20°C and 60% RH for nine weeks. Finally, the samples were dried at 60°C and cooled to room temperature in a desiccator for three days before testing. Two specimens with 0.5%–2.0% water absorption were subjected to the heat release rate and ignition tests. Three specimens with 2.0%–4.0% water absorption were subjected to the noncombustibility test.Table 1
Physical properties of polymers.
Type of polymer
Volatile portion (%)
Particle diameter∗ (%)
Acid value(mgKOH/mg)
Apparent density(g/mL)
EVA
Less than 2.0
Less than 2.0
Less than 2.0
0.50 ± 0.10
VVA
Less than 2.0
Less than 2.0
Less than 2.0
0.53 ± 0.10
PAE
Less than 2.0
Less than 2.0
Less than 2.0
0.50 ± 0.10
Polymer dispersion
Solid ratio(%)
pH(20°C)
Viscosity(mPa·s)
Density(g/mL)
SBR
44.6
8.0–9.0
500–1500
1.0
∗Residual mass ratio after passing through a 300 μm sieve.Table 2
PCM composition.
Type of polymer
Polymer content(kg/m3)
Mortar flow (mm)
W/C45%
W/C 50%
W/C60%
10 (mm)
30 (mm)
50 (mm)
None∗
0
113
150
159
159
195
EVA
10
118
166
215
20
128
180
158
158
213
30
140
183
225
40
138
190
215
50
153
160
182
182
193
75
169
100
148
168
172
172
198
VVA
10
185
20
145
185
213
30
190
40
185
50
195
100
180
SBR
10
183
20
155
180
180
180
228
30
195
40
197
50
223
223
223
75
—
100
—
—
—
PAE
10
190
20
177
30
191
40
193
50
190
75
203
100
208
∗Without polymer addition; blank implies no parameter; em dash implies that measurement was impossible.


## 2.1.2. Test Methods

The heat release rate test was conducted according to ISO 5660-1 (Cone Calorimeter Standard Test Method) [17]. The source of ignition was an electric spark generated by a cone-type electric. The heat release amount and heat release rate were measured by oxygen-consumption calorimetry [15–17]. An incombustible material shows a total calorific value of less than 8 MJ/m2 for 20 min after heating and a maximum heat release rate of less than 200 kW/m2 for 10 s continuously. In addition, such a material is devoid of cracks or holes on the surface, which render it hazardous when used as a fire retardant. Noncombustibility tests were conducted according to ISO 1182 (reaction to fire tests for building products: noncombustibility test) [18]. The temperature of the heating furnace and weight change of the specimen were measured. As part of the test procedure, a cylindrical specimen was placed in a heating furnace at 750°C, and the temperature increase inside the furnace was measured.As an important requirement in the noncombustibility test, the difference between the temperature of the incombustible material and the maximum temperature inside the furnace must be 20°C within 20 minutes after heating is commenced, and the average temperature 1 min after heating is ceased must be less than 20°C, with less than 30% weight loss of the specimen.Moreover, as a mortar contains water and is hence not a uniform material, more than 20 min would be necessary to stabilize the temperature inside the furnace. In this study, the heating time was set as 30 min from the preliminary experiment. In addition, some specimens (unit polymer content: more than 50 kg/m3) that could undergo ignition or spalling were tested by JIS A 9523 (loose fill thermal insulation materials) in the preliminary experiment [19]. The temperatures of the sample and interior of the furnace were measured using a K-type thermoelectric couple installed at both inside and outside of specimen. Figure 1 shows the setup for the flammability and temperature measurement tests.Figure 1
Flammability test and temperature measurement test.


## 2.2. Mechanical Properties of PCM

### 2.2.1. Materials and Composition

The mortar specimen for mechanical property test contained the same materials as shown in Table1. The experimental parameters and PCM composition were adjusted based on the polymer type, polymer-cement ratio, and hot pressing test, as summarized in Table 3. Four proportions were used for the tests with a fixed water-cement ratio of 50. In this study, the amount of polymer is presented as the weight per unit volume, where 10 kg·m−3 unit polymer weight in the PCM composition corresponds to a polymer-cement ratio of 2%.Table 3
Composition of PCM mixtures.
Type of polymer
Polymer-cement ratio(%)
Water-cement ratio (%)
Air content(%)
Flow(mm)
None∗
0
50
4.9
171
EVA
5
50
6.2
207
10
7.6
217
20
8.7
222
VVA
5
50
7.7
193
10
7.6
201
20
7.7
205
PAE
5
50
6.8
194
10
8.2
203
20
9.2
224
∗Without polymer addition.The specimens for the compressive strength test and the elastic modulus test were cylindrical (100 mm in diameter and 200 mm in height) and more than three specimens were prepared for each test. The results presented hereinafter are averages. Each specimen was cured under conditions of 90% relative humidity at 20°C for fourteen days. All specimens were dried under conditions of 60% relative humidity at 20°C for sixty-three days. Finally, all specimens were dried in an oven at 60°C for seven days and were kept in a desiccator. Using these procedures, the water absorption rate for each specimen was controlled in range of 1.5~2.0%.


### 2.2.2. Test Methods

A hot pressing test method was used to evaluate the mechanical properties of PCM at elevated temperature. As illustrated in Figure2, five thermocouples were placed into the specimen to measure the temperature changes. Each specimen was placed in the heating furnace for the hot pressing test, as shown in Figure 3. Based on previous data, the rate and amount of heat released from PCM depended on the polymer content regardless of the W/C. In this study, the amount of heat released followed the order VVA < EVA < PAE < SBR. This indicated that PCM modified with VVA and EVA at polymer contents of less than 75 kg·m−3 and PCM with PAE at a polymer content of less than 30 kg·m−3 meet the requirements as incombustible materials.Figure 2
Setup for temperature measurement of PCM.
(a)
Thermocouple
(b)
Heating furnaceFigure 3
Setup for heating compression test.In the conventional test method at a heating rate of 150°C·h−1, the specimen generated spalling after 3 h of heating with a water absorption rate of 3%. In this study, the water absorption rate was controlled in the range of 1.5~2.0%, and all specimens were heated at a rate of 100°C·h−1.The diameter of the test specimen used in the experiment is 100 mm. As shown in Figure2(a), the thermocouples were embedded in the specimen to check the temperature of the surface, inside, and center of the specimen. When the surface of each specimen reached a predetermined temperature, the heating temperature was maintained until the center of the specimen reached the target temperature. The time for the inside and outside of the PCM to reach the same temperature depends on the heating temperature and time. The heating program used for the furnace is shown in Figure 4. Figure 4 shows the time required to reach the total internal temperature of the specimen in each heating temperature range. In this study, heating temperatures were set to 200°C, 400°C, 600°C, and 800°C. The surface temperature of each specimen reaches 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours, respectively. Thereafter, the time at which the center temperature of each specimen reaches the corresponding temperature is 3, 2, 2, and 1 hour, respectively. In the case of heating at 200°C, the time for reaching the inner and outer temperatures to 200°C was 5 hours, and for 800°C, it took 9 hours for the inner and outer temperatures to reach 800°C.Figure 4
Heating program.As it illustrated in Figure3, the compressive strength was measured after the temperature at the center of the specimen reached the target temperature.


## 2.2.1. Materials and Composition

The mortar specimen for mechanical property test contained the same materials as shown in Table1. The experimental parameters and PCM composition were adjusted based on the polymer type, polymer-cement ratio, and hot pressing test, as summarized in Table 3. Four proportions were used for the tests with a fixed water-cement ratio of 50. In this study, the amount of polymer is presented as the weight per unit volume, where 10 kg·m−3 unit polymer weight in the PCM composition corresponds to a polymer-cement ratio of 2%.Table 3
Composition of PCM mixtures.
Type of polymer
Polymer-cement ratio(%)
Water-cement ratio (%)
Air content(%)
Flow(mm)
None∗
0
50
4.9
171
EVA
5
50
6.2
207
10
7.6
217
20
8.7
222
VVA
5
50
7.7
193
10
7.6
201
20
7.7
205
PAE
5
50
6.8
194
10
8.2
203
20
9.2
224
∗Without polymer addition.The specimens for the compressive strength test and the elastic modulus test were cylindrical (100 mm in diameter and 200 mm in height) and more than three specimens were prepared for each test. The results presented hereinafter are averages. Each specimen was cured under conditions of 90% relative humidity at 20°C for fourteen days. All specimens were dried under conditions of 60% relative humidity at 20°C for sixty-three days. Finally, all specimens were dried in an oven at 60°C for seven days and were kept in a desiccator. Using these procedures, the water absorption rate for each specimen was controlled in range of 1.5~2.0%.


## 2.2.2. Test Methods

A hot pressing test method was used to evaluate the mechanical properties of PCM at elevated temperature. As illustrated in Figure2, five thermocouples were placed into the specimen to measure the temperature changes. Each specimen was placed in the heating furnace for the hot pressing test, as shown in Figure 3. Based on previous data, the rate and amount of heat released from PCM depended on the polymer content regardless of the W/C. In this study, the amount of heat released followed the order VVA < EVA < PAE < SBR. This indicated that PCM modified with VVA and EVA at polymer contents of less than 75 kg·m−3 and PCM with PAE at a polymer content of less than 30 kg·m−3 meet the requirements as incombustible materials.Figure 2
Setup for temperature measurement of PCM.
(a)
Thermocouple
(b)
Heating furnaceFigure 3
Setup for heating compression test.In the conventional test method at a heating rate of 150°C·h−1, the specimen generated spalling after 3 h of heating with a water absorption rate of 3%. In this study, the water absorption rate was controlled in the range of 1.5~2.0%, and all specimens were heated at a rate of 100°C·h−1.The diameter of the test specimen used in the experiment is 100 mm. As shown in Figure2(a), the thermocouples were embedded in the specimen to check the temperature of the surface, inside, and center of the specimen. When the surface of each specimen reached a predetermined temperature, the heating temperature was maintained until the center of the specimen reached the target temperature. The time for the inside and outside of the PCM to reach the same temperature depends on the heating temperature and time. The heating program used for the furnace is shown in Figure 4. Figure 4 shows the time required to reach the total internal temperature of the specimen in each heating temperature range. In this study, heating temperatures were set to 200°C, 400°C, 600°C, and 800°C. The surface temperature of each specimen reaches 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours, respectively. Thereafter, the time at which the center temperature of each specimen reaches the corresponding temperature is 3, 2, 2, and 1 hour, respectively. In the case of heating at 200°C, the time for reaching the inner and outer temperatures to 200°C was 5 hours, and for 800°C, it took 9 hours for the inner and outer temperatures to reach 800°C.Figure 4
Heating program.As it illustrated in Figure3, the compressive strength was measured after the temperature at the center of the specimen reached the target temperature.


## 3. Results and Analysis

### 3.1. Combustion Properties

#### 3.1.1. Heat Release Rate Test Results

Specimen fuming was generated in every SBR series and EVA series with 40 kg/m3 unit polymer content. PCM in the SBR series with more than 40 kg/m3 polymer content and EVA series containing 100 kg/m3 polymer content underwent ignition. Spalling was particularly evident in the case of the VVA series specimens with 100 kg/m3 polymer content. These observations indicate that the fuming, ignition state, and spalling characteristics of the PCMs differ with the polymer type, unit polymer content, and W/C. It was also observed that the specimens without spalling had no cracks or holes, regardless of the presence of the polymer.Figure5 illustrates the total heat release amount of the PCM for 20 min after the start of the heating. In case of the EVA and VVA series, the higher the the unit polymer content, the greater the total heat release, regardless of the difference in W/C. In the case of the samples in the SBR series with more than 40 kg/m3 unit polymer content, the total heat release amount increased with an increase in the polymer content upon ignition. The polymer content and release rate exceeded 40 kg/m3 and 8 MJ/m2, respectively.Figure 5
Total heat release amount of PCM for 20 min after start of heating.SBR is decomposed into styrene and butadiene-latex at around 200°C and is vaporized by pyrolysis at around 360°C. The temperature at the surface layer of the specimen exceeded the maximum temperature of decomposition and vaporization 5 min after heating was started. It is thought that the rapid increase in the heat release amount and heat release rate resulted from the oxygen consumption upon ignition.


#### 3.1.2. Noncombustibility Test Results

Table4 presents the observation results of the specimens during the test. Spalling occurred between 80 and 180 s; the higher the unit polymer content in the PCM, the faster the spalling. Ignition and smoke generation occurred between 90 and 320 s; again, the higher the unit polymer content in the PCM, the faster the ignition of the sample. Figure 6 also shows the relationship between the polymer content in the PCM and the temperature change inside the furnace.Table 4
Observation of specimens.
State
Type of polymer
Unit polymer content in PCM(kg/m3)
0
10
20
30
40
50
100
Spalling
EVA
△
△
○
VVA
△
△
○
SBR
△
○
Ignition and smoke
EVA
○
VVA
○
○
SBR
△
○
○
○
○
○: generation at all specimens; △: generation at part of specimens.Figure 6
Relationship between unit polymer content in PCM and temperature change inside the furnace.Temperature change indicates the temperature difference between the maximum temperature inside the furnace 30 min after the start of heating and the average temperature for 1 min at the end of heating. The EVA series specimens with a unit polymer content of less than 50 kg/m3 showed a temperature change of less than 20°C, while the EVA series with 100 kg/m3 polymer content showed a temperature change of more than 50°C. The VVA series with a unit polymer content more than 30 kg/m3 and the SBR series with a unit polymer content exceeding 20 kg/m3 showed a temperature change of more than 20°C. The higher the unit polymer content in the PCM, the greater the temperature change. However, the VVA and SBR series with 100 kg/m3 unit polymer content showed similar temperature change as the series with a unit polymer content of 50 kg/m3.The mass of each PCM series specimen without spalling was also measured after heating end. Figure7 indicates the relationship between the unit polymer content in the PCM and the mass loss rate after heating. The mass loss rate shows a linear increase with an increase in the unit polymer content.Figure 7
Relationship between unit polymer content in PCM and mass loss rate after heating.The mass loss rate of the PCM was less than 30%, regardless of the polymer type, unit polymer content, and W/C. It is thought that the mass reduction of the PCM was caused by free water in the specimen, some combined water in the cement matrix, and the decomposed polymer. Moreover, it is thought that the increase in mass loss with increasing polymer content was caused by the decomposition of the polymer.When the polymer content was 10 kg/m3 and the specimen mass was varied in the range 0.4%–0.5%, the mass loss rate of the SBR and VVA series increased with the unit polymer content. Additionally, the results of the noncombustibility test showed that decomposition pattern of the polymer differed between polymer types. In particular, it was thought that the SBR series underwent combustion more readily than the other PCM series, because of the combustion of the polymer.


#### 3.1.3. Evaluation of Combustion Properties Based on PCM Composition and Specimen Thickness

Figure8 presents the relationship between the unit polymer content in the PCM and the total heat release. Ignition was generated in the case of the PAE series with more than 40 kg/m3 unit polymer content and specimens with 20, 50, and 100 kg/m3 unit polymer content in the SBR series. Spalling was generated in the case of the EVA sample with 100 kg/m3 unit polymer content, while no cracks or holes were found in the other samples of the same series.Figure 8
Relation between unit polymer content in PCM and total heat release amount.As shown in Figure8, both the PAE series and SBR series show a proportionate relationship to the unit polymer content. It is necessary to consider PCM ignition due to the ignition possibility, especially in the SBR series.Figure9 presents the relationship between the thickness of the specimen and the total heat release amount. Ignition occurred in the case of the specimens with 10 mm thickness, in the SBR and EVA series with 50 kg/m3 unit polymer content. Spalling was also observed for the samples in the EVA series having 30 and 50 mm thickness, with 50 kg/m3 unit polymer content. The thicker the specimen, the lower the total heat release amount because the absolute polymer content increases with the specimen thickness.Figure 9
Relationship between specimen thickness and total heat release amount.Figure10 shows the temperature change for the specimens in the EVA series with 20 kg/m3 unit polymer content and different thicknesses. For a thickness of 10 mm, the surface temperature increased after 3 min as compared to that for the other samples; the internal temperature of the specimen increased upon heating, possibly because of the accumulation of heat inside the specimen due to continuous heating. In cases of the specimens with 30 mm and 50 mm thickness, the maximum temperature was less than 200°C.Figure 10
Temperature change inside and outside the specimen with specimen thickness.


### 3.2. Mechanical Properties

#### 3.2.1. Mechanical Properties at Room Temperature

The mechanical properties of PCM at room temperature were evaluated based on the polymer type and content. The compressive strength of PCM is presented in Figure11 and the modulus of elasticity of PCM is shown in Figure 12. The series of EVA- and PAE-modified PCM showed an increase in the compressive strength with increasing polymer content, whereas the VVA-modified PCM series showed little increase. On the other hand, the VVA- and PAE-modified samples showed a decline in the modulus of elasticity with increasing polymer content. PCM with EVA 10% and the PAE series showed good mechanical properties.Figure 11
Compressive strength of PCM with various polymers at room temperature.Figure 12
Modulus of elasticity of PCM with various polymers at room temperature.


#### 3.2.2. Mechanical Properties at High Temperature

The mechanical properties of PCM were also evaluated at elevated temperature with variation of the polymer type and content. The compressive strength of the PCM series is shown in Figure13 and the elastic modulus of PCM is shown in Figure 14. As shown in Table 4, VVA had a higher spalling risk than the other polymers. The compressive strength test showed that the VVA series had lower strength. According to a previous study, the incombustibility of PCM varies depending on the polymer type and unit polymer content. The compressive strength decreased with increasing polymer content. The PAE series showed excellent fire resistance in the temperature range of 200~400°C. On the other hand, the EVA and VVA series showed a rapid decrease in the compressive strength when the polymer content exceeded 5%. Most of the specimens showed a decline in the elastic modulus with increasing polymer content, with the exception of the 5% EVA and 5% PAE species. PCM with EVA 5% and the PAE series showed good mechanical properties in temperature range of 200~400°C.Figure 13
Compressive strength of PCM with various polymers at high temperature.
(a)
EVA
(b)
VVA
(c)
PAEFigure 14
Modulus of elasticity of PCM with various polymers at high temperature.
(a)
EVA
(b)
VVA
(c)
PAE


## 3.1. Combustion Properties

### 3.1.1. Heat Release Rate Test Results

Specimen fuming was generated in every SBR series and EVA series with 40 kg/m3 unit polymer content. PCM in the SBR series with more than 40 kg/m3 polymer content and EVA series containing 100 kg/m3 polymer content underwent ignition. Spalling was particularly evident in the case of the VVA series specimens with 100 kg/m3 polymer content. These observations indicate that the fuming, ignition state, and spalling characteristics of the PCMs differ with the polymer type, unit polymer content, and W/C. It was also observed that the specimens without spalling had no cracks or holes, regardless of the presence of the polymer.Figure5 illustrates the total heat release amount of the PCM for 20 min after the start of the heating. In case of the EVA and VVA series, the higher the the unit polymer content, the greater the total heat release, regardless of the difference in W/C. In the case of the samples in the SBR series with more than 40 kg/m3 unit polymer content, the total heat release amount increased with an increase in the polymer content upon ignition. The polymer content and release rate exceeded 40 kg/m3 and 8 MJ/m2, respectively.Figure 5
Total heat release amount of PCM for 20 min after start of heating.SBR is decomposed into styrene and butadiene-latex at around 200°C and is vaporized by pyrolysis at around 360°C. The temperature at the surface layer of the specimen exceeded the maximum temperature of decomposition and vaporization 5 min after heating was started. It is thought that the rapid increase in the heat release amount and heat release rate resulted from the oxygen consumption upon ignition.


### 3.1.2. Noncombustibility Test Results

Table4 presents the observation results of the specimens during the test. Spalling occurred between 80 and 180 s; the higher the unit polymer content in the PCM, the faster the spalling. Ignition and smoke generation occurred between 90 and 320 s; again, the higher the unit polymer content in the PCM, the faster the ignition of the sample. Figure 6 also shows the relationship between the polymer content in the PCM and the temperature change inside the furnace.Table 4
Observation of specimens.
State
Type of polymer
Unit polymer content in PCM(kg/m3)
0
10
20
30
40
50
100
Spalling
EVA
△
△
○
VVA
△
△
○
SBR
△
○
Ignition and smoke
EVA
○
VVA
○
○
SBR
△
○
○
○
○
○: generation at all specimens; △: generation at part of specimens.Figure 6
Relationship between unit polymer content in PCM and temperature change inside the furnace.Temperature change indicates the temperature difference between the maximum temperature inside the furnace 30 min after the start of heating and the average temperature for 1 min at the end of heating. The EVA series specimens with a unit polymer content of less than 50 kg/m3 showed a temperature change of less than 20°C, while the EVA series with 100 kg/m3 polymer content showed a temperature change of more than 50°C. The VVA series with a unit polymer content more than 30 kg/m3 and the SBR series with a unit polymer content exceeding 20 kg/m3 showed a temperature change of more than 20°C. The higher the unit polymer content in the PCM, the greater the temperature change. However, the VVA and SBR series with 100 kg/m3 unit polymer content showed similar temperature change as the series with a unit polymer content of 50 kg/m3.The mass of each PCM series specimen without spalling was also measured after heating end. Figure7 indicates the relationship between the unit polymer content in the PCM and the mass loss rate after heating. The mass loss rate shows a linear increase with an increase in the unit polymer content.Figure 7
Relationship between unit polymer content in PCM and mass loss rate after heating.The mass loss rate of the PCM was less than 30%, regardless of the polymer type, unit polymer content, and W/C. It is thought that the mass reduction of the PCM was caused by free water in the specimen, some combined water in the cement matrix, and the decomposed polymer. Moreover, it is thought that the increase in mass loss with increasing polymer content was caused by the decomposition of the polymer.When the polymer content was 10 kg/m3 and the specimen mass was varied in the range 0.4%–0.5%, the mass loss rate of the SBR and VVA series increased with the unit polymer content. Additionally, the results of the noncombustibility test showed that decomposition pattern of the polymer differed between polymer types. In particular, it was thought that the SBR series underwent combustion more readily than the other PCM series, because of the combustion of the polymer.


### 3.1.3. Evaluation of Combustion Properties Based on PCM Composition and Specimen Thickness

Figure8 presents the relationship between the unit polymer content in the PCM and the total heat release. Ignition was generated in the case of the PAE series with more than 40 kg/m3 unit polymer content and specimens with 20, 50, and 100 kg/m3 unit polymer content in the SBR series. Spalling was generated in the case of the EVA sample with 100 kg/m3 unit polymer content, while no cracks or holes were found in the other samples of the same series.Figure 8
Relation between unit polymer content in PCM and total heat release amount.As shown in Figure8, both the PAE series and SBR series show a proportionate relationship to the unit polymer content. It is necessary to consider PCM ignition due to the ignition possibility, especially in the SBR series.Figure9 presents the relationship between the thickness of the specimen and the total heat release amount. Ignition occurred in the case of the specimens with 10 mm thickness, in the SBR and EVA series with 50 kg/m3 unit polymer content. Spalling was also observed for the samples in the EVA series having 30 and 50 mm thickness, with 50 kg/m3 unit polymer content. The thicker the specimen, the lower the total heat release amount because the absolute polymer content increases with the specimen thickness.Figure 9
Relationship between specimen thickness and total heat release amount.Figure10 shows the temperature change for the specimens in the EVA series with 20 kg/m3 unit polymer content and different thicknesses. For a thickness of 10 mm, the surface temperature increased after 3 min as compared to that for the other samples; the internal temperature of the specimen increased upon heating, possibly because of the accumulation of heat inside the specimen due to continuous heating. In cases of the specimens with 30 mm and 50 mm thickness, the maximum temperature was less than 200°C.Figure 10
Temperature change inside and outside the specimen with specimen thickness.


## 3.1.1. Heat Release Rate Test Results

Specimen fuming was generated in every SBR series and EVA series with 40 kg/m3 unit polymer content. PCM in the SBR series with more than 40 kg/m3 polymer content and EVA series containing 100 kg/m3 polymer content underwent ignition. Spalling was particularly evident in the case of the VVA series specimens with 100 kg/m3 polymer content. These observations indicate that the fuming, ignition state, and spalling characteristics of the PCMs differ with the polymer type, unit polymer content, and W/C. It was also observed that the specimens without spalling had no cracks or holes, regardless of the presence of the polymer.Figure5 illustrates the total heat release amount of the PCM for 20 min after the start of the heating. In case of the EVA and VVA series, the higher the the unit polymer content, the greater the total heat release, regardless of the difference in W/C. In the case of the samples in the SBR series with more than 40 kg/m3 unit polymer content, the total heat release amount increased with an increase in the polymer content upon ignition. The polymer content and release rate exceeded 40 kg/m3 and 8 MJ/m2, respectively.Figure 5
Total heat release amount of PCM for 20 min after start of heating.SBR is decomposed into styrene and butadiene-latex at around 200°C and is vaporized by pyrolysis at around 360°C. The temperature at the surface layer of the specimen exceeded the maximum temperature of decomposition and vaporization 5 min after heating was started. It is thought that the rapid increase in the heat release amount and heat release rate resulted from the oxygen consumption upon ignition.


## 3.1.2. Noncombustibility Test Results

Table4 presents the observation results of the specimens during the test. Spalling occurred between 80 and 180 s; the higher the unit polymer content in the PCM, the faster the spalling. Ignition and smoke generation occurred between 90 and 320 s; again, the higher the unit polymer content in the PCM, the faster the ignition of the sample. Figure 6 also shows the relationship between the polymer content in the PCM and the temperature change inside the furnace.Table 4
Observation of specimens.
State
Type of polymer
Unit polymer content in PCM(kg/m3)
0
10
20
30
40
50
100
Spalling
EVA
△
△
○
VVA
△
△
○
SBR
△
○
Ignition and smoke
EVA
○
VVA
○
○
SBR
△
○
○
○
○
○: generation at all specimens; △: generation at part of specimens.Figure 6
Relationship between unit polymer content in PCM and temperature change inside the furnace.Temperature change indicates the temperature difference between the maximum temperature inside the furnace 30 min after the start of heating and the average temperature for 1 min at the end of heating. The EVA series specimens with a unit polymer content of less than 50 kg/m3 showed a temperature change of less than 20°C, while the EVA series with 100 kg/m3 polymer content showed a temperature change of more than 50°C. The VVA series with a unit polymer content more than 30 kg/m3 and the SBR series with a unit polymer content exceeding 20 kg/m3 showed a temperature change of more than 20°C. The higher the unit polymer content in the PCM, the greater the temperature change. However, the VVA and SBR series with 100 kg/m3 unit polymer content showed similar temperature change as the series with a unit polymer content of 50 kg/m3.The mass of each PCM series specimen without spalling was also measured after heating end. Figure7 indicates the relationship between the unit polymer content in the PCM and the mass loss rate after heating. The mass loss rate shows a linear increase with an increase in the unit polymer content.Figure 7
Relationship between unit polymer content in PCM and mass loss rate after heating.The mass loss rate of the PCM was less than 30%, regardless of the polymer type, unit polymer content, and W/C. It is thought that the mass reduction of the PCM was caused by free water in the specimen, some combined water in the cement matrix, and the decomposed polymer. Moreover, it is thought that the increase in mass loss with increasing polymer content was caused by the decomposition of the polymer.When the polymer content was 10 kg/m3 and the specimen mass was varied in the range 0.4%–0.5%, the mass loss rate of the SBR and VVA series increased with the unit polymer content. Additionally, the results of the noncombustibility test showed that decomposition pattern of the polymer differed between polymer types. In particular, it was thought that the SBR series underwent combustion more readily than the other PCM series, because of the combustion of the polymer.


## 3.1.3. Evaluation of Combustion Properties Based on PCM Composition and Specimen Thickness

Figure8 presents the relationship between the unit polymer content in the PCM and the total heat release. Ignition was generated in the case of the PAE series with more than 40 kg/m3 unit polymer content and specimens with 20, 50, and 100 kg/m3 unit polymer content in the SBR series. Spalling was generated in the case of the EVA sample with 100 kg/m3 unit polymer content, while no cracks or holes were found in the other samples of the same series.Figure 8
Relation between unit polymer content in PCM and total heat release amount.As shown in Figure8, both the PAE series and SBR series show a proportionate relationship to the unit polymer content. It is necessary to consider PCM ignition due to the ignition possibility, especially in the SBR series.Figure9 presents the relationship between the thickness of the specimen and the total heat release amount. Ignition occurred in the case of the specimens with 10 mm thickness, in the SBR and EVA series with 50 kg/m3 unit polymer content. Spalling was also observed for the samples in the EVA series having 30 and 50 mm thickness, with 50 kg/m3 unit polymer content. The thicker the specimen, the lower the total heat release amount because the absolute polymer content increases with the specimen thickness.Figure 9
Relationship between specimen thickness and total heat release amount.Figure10 shows the temperature change for the specimens in the EVA series with 20 kg/m3 unit polymer content and different thicknesses. For a thickness of 10 mm, the surface temperature increased after 3 min as compared to that for the other samples; the internal temperature of the specimen increased upon heating, possibly because of the accumulation of heat inside the specimen due to continuous heating. In cases of the specimens with 30 mm and 50 mm thickness, the maximum temperature was less than 200°C.Figure 10
Temperature change inside and outside the specimen with specimen thickness.


## 3.2. Mechanical Properties

### 3.2.1. Mechanical Properties at Room Temperature

The mechanical properties of PCM at room temperature were evaluated based on the polymer type and content. The compressive strength of PCM is presented in Figure11 and the modulus of elasticity of PCM is shown in Figure 12. The series of EVA- and PAE-modified PCM showed an increase in the compressive strength with increasing polymer content, whereas the VVA-modified PCM series showed little increase. On the other hand, the VVA- and PAE-modified samples showed a decline in the modulus of elasticity with increasing polymer content. PCM with EVA 10% and the PAE series showed good mechanical properties.Figure 11
Compressive strength of PCM with various polymers at room temperature.Figure 12
Modulus of elasticity of PCM with various polymers at room temperature.


### 3.2.2. Mechanical Properties at High Temperature

The mechanical properties of PCM were also evaluated at elevated temperature with variation of the polymer type and content. The compressive strength of the PCM series is shown in Figure13 and the elastic modulus of PCM is shown in Figure 14. As shown in Table 4, VVA had a higher spalling risk than the other polymers. The compressive strength test showed that the VVA series had lower strength. According to a previous study, the incombustibility of PCM varies depending on the polymer type and unit polymer content. The compressive strength decreased with increasing polymer content. The PAE series showed excellent fire resistance in the temperature range of 200~400°C. On the other hand, the EVA and VVA series showed a rapid decrease in the compressive strength when the polymer content exceeded 5%. Most of the specimens showed a decline in the elastic modulus with increasing polymer content, with the exception of the 5% EVA and 5% PAE species. PCM with EVA 5% and the PAE series showed good mechanical properties in temperature range of 200~400°C.Figure 13
Compressive strength of PCM with various polymers at high temperature.
(a)
EVA
(b)
VVA
(c)
PAEFigure 14
Modulus of elasticity of PCM with various polymers at high temperature.
(a)
EVA
(b)
VVA
(c)
PAE


## 3.2.1. Mechanical Properties at Room Temperature

The mechanical properties of PCM at room temperature were evaluated based on the polymer type and content. The compressive strength of PCM is presented in Figure11 and the modulus of elasticity of PCM is shown in Figure 12. The series of EVA- and PAE-modified PCM showed an increase in the compressive strength with increasing polymer content, whereas the VVA-modified PCM series showed little increase. On the other hand, the VVA- and PAE-modified samples showed a decline in the modulus of elasticity with increasing polymer content. PCM with EVA 10% and the PAE series showed good mechanical properties.Figure 11
Compressive strength of PCM with various polymers at room temperature.Figure 12
Modulus of elasticity of PCM with various polymers at room temperature.


## 3.2.2. Mechanical Properties at High Temperature

The mechanical properties of PCM were also evaluated at elevated temperature with variation of the polymer type and content. The compressive strength of the PCM series is shown in Figure13 and the elastic modulus of PCM is shown in Figure 14. As shown in Table 4, VVA had a higher spalling risk than the other polymers. The compressive strength test showed that the VVA series had lower strength. According to a previous study, the incombustibility of PCM varies depending on the polymer type and unit polymer content. The compressive strength decreased with increasing polymer content. The PAE series showed excellent fire resistance in the temperature range of 200~400°C. On the other hand, the EVA and VVA series showed a rapid decrease in the compressive strength when the polymer content exceeded 5%. Most of the specimens showed a decline in the elastic modulus with increasing polymer content, with the exception of the 5% EVA and 5% PAE species. PCM with EVA 5% and the PAE series showed good mechanical properties in temperature range of 200~400°C.Figure 13
Compressive strength of PCM with various polymers at high temperature.
(a)
EVA
(b)
VVA
(c)
PAEFigure 14
Modulus of elasticity of PCM with various polymers at high temperature.
(a)
EVA
(b)
VVA
(c)
PAE


## 4. Conclusions

The rate and amount of heat release from a PCM depended on the polymer content, regardless of the W/C. In this study, the heat release amount was found to follow the order VVA < EVA < PAE < SBR.Specimens in the VVA and EVA series with polymer contents less than 75 kg/m3, as well as the specimens in the PAE and SBR series with polymer contents less than 30 kg/m3, met the requirements for an incombustible material. The noncombustibility of the PCM differed depending on the polymer type and unit polymer content. In this study, the incombustibility of the PCM was in the following order: SBR < VVA < EVA.Given the insufficient experimental data on the fire resistance and safety of PCM, the mechanical properties of PCM at elevated temperature were investigated using three types of polymers as modifiers, namely, EVA, VVA, and PAE.The test method employed involves spalling risk due to the heating speed and water absorption rate of PCM. This study focused on a water absorption rate of 1.5~2.0% and the polymer-cement ratio required to prevent spalling. The hot pressing test demonstrated that PCM with EVA 5% and the PAE series showed good mechanical properties in the temperature range of 200~400°C.



---

*Source: 5853687-2017-07-11.xml*