# Measurement-Based Spatial Correlation and Capacity of Indoor Distributed MIMO System

Authors: Yan Zhang; Limin Xiao; Shidong Zhou; Jing Wang
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

Distributed MIMO (D-MIMO) system is one of the candidates for future wireless access networks. In this study, the spatial correlation and capacity in indoor D-MIMO system are presented. All results are from the actual channel measurements in typical indoor scenarios, including office and corridor. Based on measured data, spatial correlation coefficients between distributed transmitting antennas are analyzed. Although the literature about D-MIMO system assumes the small scale fading between distributed antennas is independent, we find that spatial correlation may still exist in specific propagation scenario. This correlation can also degrade the performance of D-MIMO system. To mitigate the impact of spatial correlation, one efficient method is to use transmitting antenna selection technique.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Wireless communication systems have achieved fast developments in past years, with mobile data traffic being expected to grow to 10.8 exabytes per month by 2016 [1] and most traffic to occur in indoor environments. Consequently, in the future communication network, indoor wireless access will play a more important role. To realize high throughput and quality in wireless access systems, one potential approach is to use multiple antennas at both sides of the link. Multi-input-multioutput (MIMO) system is such a technique that can lead significant capacity gain as long as the multipath components of channel are uncorrelated [2]. Most theoretic analyses about MIMO systems are based on this rich scattering assumption. However, it is shown that spatial correlations may exist in real environment for MIMO systems, and these correlations can degrade the system performance obviously [2–6].In this paper, distributed MIMO (D-MIMO) systems are considered by actual measurements in typical indoor scenarios. Compared with conventional MIMO systems, D-MIMO systems are able to provide enough spatial diversity since the antennas are separated [7]. Higher energy efficiency and fairer coverage can also be achieved in D-MIMO systems [8, 9]. Consequently, D-MIMO architecture is viewed as one potential choice for future wireless access systems.Primary D-MIMO research work focuses on the theoretical analysis. However, for the application of D-MIMO systems, investigating the real propagation characteristics is essential. Accurate channel models are fundamental for the system design, but there are very few measurement-based analyses [10–12]. In general, it is assumed that there is no spatial correlation between distributed antennas because of large antenna separation and most existing results also verify this assumption.In this study, we concentrate on the presence of spatial correlation in indoor D-MIMO systems. The relationship between the propagation environment and spatial correlation is considered. All analyses are based on actual channel measurements in typical indoor scenarios. To collect D-MIMO channel impulse response (CIR), measurements are conducted in office and corridor scenarios. Through the raw CIR data, the spatial correlation is extracted and then its impact on channel capacity is analyzed. It is shown that in specific scenario there may be high spatial correlation even amongst distributed antennas. And this correlation can also affect the performance of D-MIMO systems. Transmitting antenna selection (TAS) technique is proved to be helpful for counteracting the impact of spatial correlation.The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section2, the channel sounder and measurement setup are introduced. With measured data, the spatial correlation is analyzed in Section 3. In Section 4, the relationship between spatial correlation and capacity is investigated. Finally, our conclusions are presented in Section 5.


## 2. Measurement Setup

### 2.1. THU Channel Sounder

Tsinghua University (THU) MIMO channel sounder [12, 13] was used to collect raw measured data, which supported both centralized and distributed MIMO channel tests. It worked at the 3.52 GHz central frequency with 40 MHz bandwidth. The major configurations of THU sounder were shown in Table 1.Table 1
The configurations of THU MIMO channel sounder.
Carrier frequency
3.52 GHz
Bandwidth
40 MHz
Tx signal length
12.8μs
Snapshot interval
1.2544 ms
Antenna configuration
7× 7
Antenna type
Omnidirectional
Antenna gain
4 dBi
Polarization
VerticalDuring this measurement campaign, a signal generator was employed by the transmitter (Tx) to output a wideband test sequence periodically. A 7-port microwave switch was used to connect the signal generator with seven distributed antenna ports, each port with only one Tx antenna. These Tx antennas are omnidirectional with vertical polarization and 4 dBi gain. At the receiver (Rx) side, seven antennas constituted a uniform linear array (ULA) with half-wavelength inter element spacing. The centralized Rx antennas, which have the same type and gain as the Tx antennas, were also connected with a 7-way switch to the RF tunnel.As shown in Figure1, the Tx antennas were distributed while the Rx antennas were centralized. With the switches in both sides, one D-MIMO system was realized by adopting fast time-division-multiplexed switching scheme. These switches were controlled by a synchronization unit and all possible antenna pairs were scanned. The test signal length tp was 12.8 μs. A guard interval tp was also inserted between adjacent transmissions to protect the test signal from the delay spread infection. The antenna pairs were switched in that fast speed to keep the environment quasi-simultaneous. Then one total snapshot interval was 7×7×2tp=1254.4 μs.Figure 1
D-MIMO measurement system.The real-time received data was stored in a server. Then the raw data was processed offline to extract the interested channel parameters.


### 2.2. Measurement Scenarios

The measurements were taken in two typical indoor scenarios (office and corridor) in FIT building, Tsinghua University.The first scenario was a typical office. The size of the office was 15.6 m (length) × 11.9 m (width) × 2.7 m (height). Typical furniture in this office included wooden desks, plastic chairs, metal cabinets, and computers. As illustrated in Figure2, seven Tx antennas (blue square markers) were distributed at different locations in the office by using long cables. Tx antenna heights were 1.2 m. The Rx antenna array was put on a trolley with 1.08 m height. Then the trolley was moved to different positions. During the campaign, four routes including total 48 positions (red dots) were measured. The length of each route was 13.2 m and the distance between adjacent positions was 1.2 m. In the following analysis, we would mainly consider two positions in the corner and middle of the office.Figure 2
Floor plan of the measurement area in office scenario.The corridor scenario was also selected in FIT building. The corridor length was 105.5 m and its floor plan was shown in Figure3. The width and height of the corridor were 2.4 m and 2.5 m, respectively. There was no furniture in this corridor. Shown as blue square markers, Tx antennas with 7.22 m separation were distributed in a line along the corridor. During the measurements, the receiver array’s position was changed along a designed route, as shown in Figure 3. Total 46 positions with 2 m separation were selected for data collection. Two positions (red dots) would be taken into account. One was at the end of corridor while the other was in the middle.Figure 3
Floor plan of the measurement area in corridor scenario.


## 2.1. THU Channel Sounder

Tsinghua University (THU) MIMO channel sounder [12, 13] was used to collect raw measured data, which supported both centralized and distributed MIMO channel tests. It worked at the 3.52 GHz central frequency with 40 MHz bandwidth. The major configurations of THU sounder were shown in Table 1.Table 1
The configurations of THU MIMO channel sounder.
Carrier frequency
3.52 GHz
Bandwidth
40 MHz
Tx signal length
12.8μs
Snapshot interval
1.2544 ms
Antenna configuration
7× 7
Antenna type
Omnidirectional
Antenna gain
4 dBi
Polarization
VerticalDuring this measurement campaign, a signal generator was employed by the transmitter (Tx) to output a wideband test sequence periodically. A 7-port microwave switch was used to connect the signal generator with seven distributed antenna ports, each port with only one Tx antenna. These Tx antennas are omnidirectional with vertical polarization and 4 dBi gain. At the receiver (Rx) side, seven antennas constituted a uniform linear array (ULA) with half-wavelength inter element spacing. The centralized Rx antennas, which have the same type and gain as the Tx antennas, were also connected with a 7-way switch to the RF tunnel.As shown in Figure1, the Tx antennas were distributed while the Rx antennas were centralized. With the switches in both sides, one D-MIMO system was realized by adopting fast time-division-multiplexed switching scheme. These switches were controlled by a synchronization unit and all possible antenna pairs were scanned. The test signal length tp was 12.8 μs. A guard interval tp was also inserted between adjacent transmissions to protect the test signal from the delay spread infection. The antenna pairs were switched in that fast speed to keep the environment quasi-simultaneous. Then one total snapshot interval was 7×7×2tp=1254.4 μs.Figure 1
D-MIMO measurement system.The real-time received data was stored in a server. Then the raw data was processed offline to extract the interested channel parameters.


## 2.2. Measurement Scenarios

The measurements were taken in two typical indoor scenarios (office and corridor) in FIT building, Tsinghua University.The first scenario was a typical office. The size of the office was 15.6 m (length) × 11.9 m (width) × 2.7 m (height). Typical furniture in this office included wooden desks, plastic chairs, metal cabinets, and computers. As illustrated in Figure2, seven Tx antennas (blue square markers) were distributed at different locations in the office by using long cables. Tx antenna heights were 1.2 m. The Rx antenna array was put on a trolley with 1.08 m height. Then the trolley was moved to different positions. During the campaign, four routes including total 48 positions (red dots) were measured. The length of each route was 13.2 m and the distance between adjacent positions was 1.2 m. In the following analysis, we would mainly consider two positions in the corner and middle of the office.Figure 2
Floor plan of the measurement area in office scenario.The corridor scenario was also selected in FIT building. The corridor length was 105.5 m and its floor plan was shown in Figure3. The width and height of the corridor were 2.4 m and 2.5 m, respectively. There was no furniture in this corridor. Shown as blue square markers, Tx antennas with 7.22 m separation were distributed in a line along the corridor. During the measurements, the receiver array’s position was changed along a designed route, as shown in Figure 3. Total 46 positions with 2 m separation were selected for data collection. Two positions (red dots) would be taken into account. One was at the end of corridor while the other was in the middle.Figure 3
Floor plan of the measurement area in corridor scenario.


## 3. Spatial Correlation Analysis

### 3.1. Transmitting Spatial Correlation

In D-MIMO system, each base station hasnT distributed antenna ports, each port with l microdiversity antennas. The mobile station’s antenna number is nR and then this D-MIMO system can be noted by (nT, l, nR) [10]. As mentioned above, in our measurement system nT=nR=7 while l=1. Then our channel sounder is a (7, 1, 7) star-shaped D-MIMO system.From raw measured data, the channel impulse response matrixH can be extracted. Here H is an nT×nR matrix whose elements are the responses between different Tx-Rx antenna pairs.Due to the centralized placement of Rx antennas, the correlation atRx side in D-MIMO system is similar to that in conventional MIMO systems, which has been well investigated. However, there are still very few considerations about the correlation between distributed Tx antennas. In general, these distributed antennas are assumed independent because of large separation [10, 11]. In this study, we will mainly focus on the Tx spatial correlations and discuss if this assumption is reasonable.The spatial correlation atTx side can be defined in the matrix form
(1)RTx=(ρ11Tx⋯ρ1nTTx⋮⋱⋮ρnT1Tx⋯ρnTnTTx),
which is called the transmitting correlation matrix.HereρijTx is the correlation coefficient between a pair of channels from the ith and jth Tx antennas, both arriving to the mth Rx element, which is defined as follows [3]:
(2)ρijTx=E[hmihmj*]-E[hmi]E[hmj*](E[|hmi|2]-|E[hmi]|2)(E[|hmj|2]-|E[hmj]|2),
where the superscript * denote conjugation. The E[·] means the average operation of independent samples. The quality of statistical estimates for ρijTx depends on the number of measured statistical realizations—the more the better [14]. During our measurement, the receiver antenna is moved back and forth in a 10λ region at each position. In postprocessing, CIR samples at this region are considered as spatial realizations. The large scale parameter can be viewed as constant in this small region [13]. Consequently, only the small scale correlations among distributed Tx antennas are involved. Besides spatial realizations, all the frequencies in 40 MHz are used for narrowband analysis. According to (2), RTx is a Hermitian matrix.Based on the measured D-MIMO channel data, we analyze the Tx spatial correlations in the mentioned two scenarios. Firstly, two receiver positions (in Figure2) in the office scenario are considered. One is position R1_2 in the corner and the other one is position R3_6 in the middle. Figure 4 shows the element magnitudes of transmitting correlation matrices at these two positions. The diagonal elements (autocorrelation coefficients) equal 1, while other elements (cross-correlation coefficients) are near to zero; that is, whether the receiver is placed in the middle or corner, the transmitting spatial correlations are very week in this scenario. Consequently the transmitting correlation matrices RTx can be viewed as an identity matrix, which coincides with the classic assumption.Transmitting correlation coefficients at (a) position R1_2 and (b) position R3_6 in office scenario.
(a)
(b)Then the transmitting spatial correlations in the corridor scenario are calculated and two receiver positions are selected, too. As shown in Figure3, position P1 is at the end of the corridor while position P2 is in the middle of Tx1 and Tx2. Figure 5 illustrates the magnitudes of transmitting correlation coefficients at these two positions. When receiver is placed at position P1, strong spatial correlations can be observed, with correlation coefficients between all Tx antenna pairs being larger than 0.5. That is because signals from different Tx antennas undergo almost the same propagation. Similar reflections and scatterings lead to strong spatial correlations.Transmitting spatial correlation coefficients at (a) position P1 and (b) position P2 in corridor scenario.
(a)
(b)As shown in Figure5(b), if the receiver locates at the position P2, Tx1 is uncorrelated with other antennas because they are fixed at different sides of the receiver. Signal from Tx1 suffers from different scattering surroundings compared with those sent by other antennas. Those Tx antennas far from the receiver, for example, Tx6 and Tx7, are strongly correlated, which is also led by the similar propagation.These interesting results in corridor are not fully in agreement with the classic assumption. Even for D-MIMO system, strong spatial correlations may still exist in specific indoor environment; that is, the separation between distributed antennas may not lead to absolute independence. Also the propagation environment itself is an important issue. The high correlations in Figure5 are caused by the long and narrow corridor structure.For comparison, we compute the entire cross-correlation coefficients{ρijTx∣i<j} at each position, and then gather these coefficients for both scenarios. Figure 6 illustrates the cumulated distribution functions (CDF) of transmitting correlation coefficients. In office scenario, the correlation coefficients are almost less than 0.5, which means that distributed Tx antennas are uncorrelated in most cases. In this scenario, there are many scatterers including wall, desks, chairs, cabinets, and computers. Rich scattering condition means that signal suffers complex propagation environment. Consequently, the spatial correlations between different Tx antennas are quite weak.Figure 6
CDF of Tx spatial correlation coefficients for DAS in office and corridor scenarios.Meanwhile, the spatial correlations in the corridor scenario are much stronger. In some specific positions, the cross-correlation coefficients are larger than 0.8. As mentioned above, the scattering environment is simple in this long and narrow corridor. Moreover, Tx antennas are placed in a line. The signals from Tx antennas travel in similar reflection environment. Then there are strong correlations between different Tx antennas, especially when these antennas are far from the receiver. These spatial correlations can degrade the D-MIMO system performance, which will be discussed in the following sections. When designing a D-MIMO system, we should try to avoid the appearance of high spatial correlation. For example, one feasible way is to distribute the Tx antennas at both sides of corridor rather than in a line.


## 3.1. Transmitting Spatial Correlation

In D-MIMO system, each base station hasnT distributed antenna ports, each port with l microdiversity antennas. The mobile station’s antenna number is nR and then this D-MIMO system can be noted by (nT, l, nR) [10]. As mentioned above, in our measurement system nT=nR=7 while l=1. Then our channel sounder is a (7, 1, 7) star-shaped D-MIMO system.From raw measured data, the channel impulse response matrixH can be extracted. Here H is an nT×nR matrix whose elements are the responses between different Tx-Rx antenna pairs.Due to the centralized placement of Rx antennas, the correlation atRx side in D-MIMO system is similar to that in conventional MIMO systems, which has been well investigated. However, there are still very few considerations about the correlation between distributed Tx antennas. In general, these distributed antennas are assumed independent because of large separation [10, 11]. In this study, we will mainly focus on the Tx spatial correlations and discuss if this assumption is reasonable.The spatial correlation atTx side can be defined in the matrix form
(1)RTx=(ρ11Tx⋯ρ1nTTx⋮⋱⋮ρnT1Tx⋯ρnTnTTx),
which is called the transmitting correlation matrix.HereρijTx is the correlation coefficient between a pair of channels from the ith and jth Tx antennas, both arriving to the mth Rx element, which is defined as follows [3]:
(2)ρijTx=E[hmihmj*]-E[hmi]E[hmj*](E[|hmi|2]-|E[hmi]|2)(E[|hmj|2]-|E[hmj]|2),
where the superscript * denote conjugation. The E[·] means the average operation of independent samples. The quality of statistical estimates for ρijTx depends on the number of measured statistical realizations—the more the better [14]. During our measurement, the receiver antenna is moved back and forth in a 10λ region at each position. In postprocessing, CIR samples at this region are considered as spatial realizations. The large scale parameter can be viewed as constant in this small region [13]. Consequently, only the small scale correlations among distributed Tx antennas are involved. Besides spatial realizations, all the frequencies in 40 MHz are used for narrowband analysis. According to (2), RTx is a Hermitian matrix.Based on the measured D-MIMO channel data, we analyze the Tx spatial correlations in the mentioned two scenarios. Firstly, two receiver positions (in Figure2) in the office scenario are considered. One is position R1_2 in the corner and the other one is position R3_6 in the middle. Figure 4 shows the element magnitudes of transmitting correlation matrices at these two positions. The diagonal elements (autocorrelation coefficients) equal 1, while other elements (cross-correlation coefficients) are near to zero; that is, whether the receiver is placed in the middle or corner, the transmitting spatial correlations are very week in this scenario. Consequently the transmitting correlation matrices RTx can be viewed as an identity matrix, which coincides with the classic assumption.Transmitting correlation coefficients at (a) position R1_2 and (b) position R3_6 in office scenario.
(a)
(b)Then the transmitting spatial correlations in the corridor scenario are calculated and two receiver positions are selected, too. As shown in Figure3, position P1 is at the end of the corridor while position P2 is in the middle of Tx1 and Tx2. Figure 5 illustrates the magnitudes of transmitting correlation coefficients at these two positions. When receiver is placed at position P1, strong spatial correlations can be observed, with correlation coefficients between all Tx antenna pairs being larger than 0.5. That is because signals from different Tx antennas undergo almost the same propagation. Similar reflections and scatterings lead to strong spatial correlations.Transmitting spatial correlation coefficients at (a) position P1 and (b) position P2 in corridor scenario.
(a)
(b)As shown in Figure5(b), if the receiver locates at the position P2, Tx1 is uncorrelated with other antennas because they are fixed at different sides of the receiver. Signal from Tx1 suffers from different scattering surroundings compared with those sent by other antennas. Those Tx antennas far from the receiver, for example, Tx6 and Tx7, are strongly correlated, which is also led by the similar propagation.These interesting results in corridor are not fully in agreement with the classic assumption. Even for D-MIMO system, strong spatial correlations may still exist in specific indoor environment; that is, the separation between distributed antennas may not lead to absolute independence. Also the propagation environment itself is an important issue. The high correlations in Figure5 are caused by the long and narrow corridor structure.For comparison, we compute the entire cross-correlation coefficients{ρijTx∣i<j} at each position, and then gather these coefficients for both scenarios. Figure 6 illustrates the cumulated distribution functions (CDF) of transmitting correlation coefficients. In office scenario, the correlation coefficients are almost less than 0.5, which means that distributed Tx antennas are uncorrelated in most cases. In this scenario, there are many scatterers including wall, desks, chairs, cabinets, and computers. Rich scattering condition means that signal suffers complex propagation environment. Consequently, the spatial correlations between different Tx antennas are quite weak.Figure 6
CDF of Tx spatial correlation coefficients for DAS in office and corridor scenarios.Meanwhile, the spatial correlations in the corridor scenario are much stronger. In some specific positions, the cross-correlation coefficients are larger than 0.8. As mentioned above, the scattering environment is simple in this long and narrow corridor. Moreover, Tx antennas are placed in a line. The signals from Tx antennas travel in similar reflection environment. Then there are strong correlations between different Tx antennas, especially when these antennas are far from the receiver. These spatial correlations can degrade the D-MIMO system performance, which will be discussed in the following sections. When designing a D-MIMO system, we should try to avoid the appearance of high spatial correlation. For example, one feasible way is to distribute the Tx antennas at both sides of corridor rather than in a line.


## 4. Capacity Results in D-MIMO System

### 4.1. Channel Capacity with Spatial Correlation

In this section, the impact of Tx spatial correlation on D-MIMO channel capacity will be analyzed. Consider a channel unknown at transmitter. The D-MIMO channel capacity with equally allocated transmitting power can be computed as [15]
(3)C=log2det[InR+Pσ2nTHH†],
where InR is nR×nR identity matrix. P is the total transmitting power and σ2 is the noise power. P/σ2 stands for the transmitting signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Superscript † denotes the conjugate transposition.The transmitting correlation matrixRTx is important for the D-MIMO system performance. The existence of spatial correlation can lead the unbalance between eigenvalues of RTx and degrade the MIMO channel capacity [16], which is also proved by our measurement results.For the selected positions in two scenarios, Figure7 illustrates the eigenvalue distributions of transmitting correlation matrix. The eigenvalues of RTx satisfy restriction:
(4)∑i=1nTλi(RTx)=nT.Eigenvalue distributions at selected positions in (a) office and (b) corridor scenarios.
(a)
(b)Due to the small spatial correlation, in office scenario seven eigenvalues of Tx correlation matrix are very close. In corridor scenario, strong spatial correlation leads the unbalances between eigenvalues. Especially when the receiver is placed at the end of corridor, there are large gaps between the max and the min eigenvalues. As a result, the channel capacity at the corridor end is affected. For example, the measured capacity at position P1 is 20.8 bit/s/Hz, which is much smaller than 27.3 bit/s/Hz at position P2.For an overall analysis, the capacity results in both scenarios are calculated. Figure8 shows the capacity coverage at all routes in the office scenario. It can be observed that the capacity values are quite close at different positions. By using D-MIMO structure we can expect a uniform capacity coverage, which can provide fairness for users at different positions. This result corresponds to the conclusion introduced by primary research [8, 11].Figure 8
Capacity coverage of D-MIMO system in office scenario.Figure9 illustrates the capacity coverage in corridor. When the receiver is placed in the middle, that is, 20 m to 60 m from the starting receiver point, the capacity coverage is uniform and satisfying. In this area, the Tx spatial correlations are relatively small. While the receiver is fixed at both ends, the capacity values are much smaller than those in the middle. It may be caused by two aspects. The first reason is the strong spatial correlations between different Tx antennas. As mentioned above, these correlations make the eigenvalues distributed uneven and degrade the D-MIMO system performance. Another important issue may be the large access distance when the receiver is at the end. Long access distance brings large pathloss, which weakens received signal strength and degrades the performance.Figure 9
Capacity coverage of D-MIMO system in corridor scenario.


### 4.2. Transmitting Antenna Selection in D-MIMO System

Limited to the size and cost requirements, usually mobile terminal only employs three or fewer antennas in practical wireless access systems. Then it is not necessary to use all Tx antennas to serve one user. Especially when Tx antennas are correlated, using more antennas cannot provide more degrees of freedom. It is better to choose fewer Tx antennas with low correlations and high SNR.TAS technique is able to use the transmitting power efficiently and reduce the processing complexity. At the same time, TAS can lead capacity gain as fixed total transmit power [17, 18]. In D-MIMO system, the affection of spatial correlation can be partially counteracted, too.The goal of TAS is to choose an optimum antenna subset to maximize capacity given by [17]
(5)Csel=maxH~∈H{C},
where H~ is a subblock matrix of H.In the following analysis, only three Rx antennas (Rx3, Rx4, and Rx5) are chosen to simulate a practical terminal. The chosen Rx array size is one wavelength (about 0.85 m). With fixed total transmitting power, the ergodic capacity (Call) with all antenna working is computed from the measured data. Then the maximum capacity (Copt) with optimum antenna subset is also calculated by searching all possible TAS schemes. The capacity gain as TAS can be defined as
(6)CG(%)=Copt-CallCall.The TAS capacity gains in corridor scenario are shown in Figure10. With different number of selected antennas, the total transmitting power is fixed for a fair comparison. Each Tx antenna is assigned equal power and different transmitting SNRs are considered. It is shown that TAS can lead obvious capacity gain, especially under low SNR. Selecting appropriate Tx antenna subset can not only centralize transmitting power but also can weaken the antenna correlation. So TAS technique can be used as a complement of the D-MIMO system, especially in those scenarios with high correlations.Figure 10
TAS capacity gains with different transmitting SNRs in corridor.


## 4.1. Channel Capacity with Spatial Correlation

In this section, the impact of Tx spatial correlation on D-MIMO channel capacity will be analyzed. Consider a channel unknown at transmitter. The D-MIMO channel capacity with equally allocated transmitting power can be computed as [15]
(3)C=log2det[InR+Pσ2nTHH†],
where InR is nR×nR identity matrix. P is the total transmitting power and σ2 is the noise power. P/σ2 stands for the transmitting signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Superscript † denotes the conjugate transposition.The transmitting correlation matrixRTx is important for the D-MIMO system performance. The existence of spatial correlation can lead the unbalance between eigenvalues of RTx and degrade the MIMO channel capacity [16], which is also proved by our measurement results.For the selected positions in two scenarios, Figure7 illustrates the eigenvalue distributions of transmitting correlation matrix. The eigenvalues of RTx satisfy restriction:
(4)∑i=1nTλi(RTx)=nT.Eigenvalue distributions at selected positions in (a) office and (b) corridor scenarios.
(a)
(b)Due to the small spatial correlation, in office scenario seven eigenvalues of Tx correlation matrix are very close. In corridor scenario, strong spatial correlation leads the unbalances between eigenvalues. Especially when the receiver is placed at the end of corridor, there are large gaps between the max and the min eigenvalues. As a result, the channel capacity at the corridor end is affected. For example, the measured capacity at position P1 is 20.8 bit/s/Hz, which is much smaller than 27.3 bit/s/Hz at position P2.For an overall analysis, the capacity results in both scenarios are calculated. Figure8 shows the capacity coverage at all routes in the office scenario. It can be observed that the capacity values are quite close at different positions. By using D-MIMO structure we can expect a uniform capacity coverage, which can provide fairness for users at different positions. This result corresponds to the conclusion introduced by primary research [8, 11].Figure 8
Capacity coverage of D-MIMO system in office scenario.Figure9 illustrates the capacity coverage in corridor. When the receiver is placed in the middle, that is, 20 m to 60 m from the starting receiver point, the capacity coverage is uniform and satisfying. In this area, the Tx spatial correlations are relatively small. While the receiver is fixed at both ends, the capacity values are much smaller than those in the middle. It may be caused by two aspects. The first reason is the strong spatial correlations between different Tx antennas. As mentioned above, these correlations make the eigenvalues distributed uneven and degrade the D-MIMO system performance. Another important issue may be the large access distance when the receiver is at the end. Long access distance brings large pathloss, which weakens received signal strength and degrades the performance.Figure 9
Capacity coverage of D-MIMO system in corridor scenario.


## 4.2. Transmitting Antenna Selection in D-MIMO System

Limited to the size and cost requirements, usually mobile terminal only employs three or fewer antennas in practical wireless access systems. Then it is not necessary to use all Tx antennas to serve one user. Especially when Tx antennas are correlated, using more antennas cannot provide more degrees of freedom. It is better to choose fewer Tx antennas with low correlations and high SNR.TAS technique is able to use the transmitting power efficiently and reduce the processing complexity. At the same time, TAS can lead capacity gain as fixed total transmit power [17, 18]. In D-MIMO system, the affection of spatial correlation can be partially counteracted, too.The goal of TAS is to choose an optimum antenna subset to maximize capacity given by [17]
(5)Csel=maxH~∈H{C},
where H~ is a subblock matrix of H.In the following analysis, only three Rx antennas (Rx3, Rx4, and Rx5) are chosen to simulate a practical terminal. The chosen Rx array size is one wavelength (about 0.85 m). With fixed total transmitting power, the ergodic capacity (Call) with all antenna working is computed from the measured data. Then the maximum capacity (Copt) with optimum antenna subset is also calculated by searching all possible TAS schemes. The capacity gain as TAS can be defined as
(6)CG(%)=Copt-CallCall.The TAS capacity gains in corridor scenario are shown in Figure10. With different number of selected antennas, the total transmitting power is fixed for a fair comparison. Each Tx antenna is assigned equal power and different transmitting SNRs are considered. It is shown that TAS can lead obvious capacity gain, especially under low SNR. Selecting appropriate Tx antenna subset can not only centralize transmitting power but also can weaken the antenna correlation. So TAS technique can be used as a complement of the D-MIMO system, especially in those scenarios with high correlations.Figure 10
TAS capacity gains with different transmitting SNRs in corridor.


## 5. Conclusion

In this study we analyzed the presence of spatial correlation in indoor D-MIMO system. Field measurements were conducted in two typical indoor scenarios, including office and corridor. Then the spatial correlations and the capacity results were estimated from measured data. It was proved that in corridor scenario there were spatial correlations between distributed Tx antennas. This correlation could lead the unbalance of eigenvalues and the degradation of channel capacity. To reduce the affection of spatial correlation, transmitting antennas selection technology was able to offer extra capacity gain. These results aimed to provide references for future indoor D-MIMO system design.



---

*Source: 596347-2013-06-13.xml*