# Analysis and Design of a Novel Multiband Antenna for Mobile Terminals

Authors: Yuan Yao; Wanzhong Chen; Xiaodong Chen; Junsheng Yu
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

A multiband planar terminal antenna with a compact size of 40 mm × 24 mm is proposed in this paper. This antenna consists of a monopole patch with two slots on it and a meandering strip loaded on the top. Two parasitic stubs and a branch on the ground are used to adjust and widen the impedance bandwidth of the antenna. Simulations and measurements are carried out to study the antenna performances in terms of impedance matching, efficiency, gain, and radiation patterns. Both of simulation and measurement results are shown to illustrate the good performance of the proposed antenna. The antenna can operate at 450–474 MHz, 860–1040 MHz, 1705–2428 MHz, and 2500–2710 MHz. These operating bandwidths cover GSM900, DCS, PCS, UMTS, LTE2500, and LTE’s low frequency band (450–470 MHz). It is very suitable for multifunctional terminal applications in wireless communication systems.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

With the development of wireless communication technology, study and design of mobile terminal antennas are getting more and more attentions. Based on the wide range of mobile applications and variety of functions, more and more frequency bands are used to meet these requirements. The use of more frequency bands has driven the demand of antennas that can operate in multifrequency bands [1–3]. Since there is small volume available for antennas, the terminal antennas should have compactness characteristic [4–6].Current mobile terminal antennas mainly use two types of antennas: planar inverted F-shaped antenna [7, 8] and planar monopole antenna [9–11]. To achieve multiband antenna in a limited area, antenna miniaturization becomes a vital issue. Slot antennas were used to achieve miniaturization [12, 13]. The sizes of antennas fabricated on substrates with high permittivity can also be reduced [14]. Besides, meandering strip was used to decrease the dimension of the antennas [15]. These miniaturization methods are very practical for mobile terminal antennas. However, the miniaturization requirements for multifunctional wireless communication systems are stricter, using only one of these methods to realize miniaturization is not enough. So we can choose combinations of several miniaturizations techniques.Several methods have been proposed to achieve multiband characteristic. The main common method is using multiple branches, in which each branch resonate at one frequency, to realize multiple resonances [16–18]. Multislots technology was also used to realize multiband [19, 20]. Besides multiband characteristic, the bandwidth of each resonant frequency should be widened because there may be multiprotocols in one wideband. Thus, several methods were proposed to extend the bandwidth of the antenna. Parasitic structures can generate additional resonant frequency near the main resonant band to merge into one wideband [21]. Stubs on ground can improve the impedance matching and widen the working bandwidth [22]. Most of the multiband antenna designs in the literatures cover the working band 800–2170 MHz, which is pretty enough for 2G and 3G mobile communication systems but is not for the 4G mobile communication systems. Since there are more than forty bands designated as LTE bands from several hundred MHz to several GHz, the antenna in the terminals should accommodate as much frequency bands as possible.This paper proposes a novel multiband antenna which covers many frequency bands including GSM900 (890–960 MHz), GSM1800 (1710–1880 MHz), GSM1900 (1850–1990 MHz), UMTS (1920–2170 MHz), LTE2500 (2500–2690 MHz), and LTE’s low frequency band (450–470 MHz). The meandering strip, antenna slot, parasitic branches, and stub on the ground were used to achieve both of multiband and compactness characteristics. Parasitic branches and stub on the ground can also widen the working frequency bands. Simulation and measurement results are shown to illustrate the good performance of the antenna. The results showed that the performance of the proposed antenna is pretty good and it is suitable for mobile terminal applications.


## 2. Antenna Design

In this design, the proposed antenna is expected to work at 450–470 MHz, 860–960 MHz, 1710–2160 MHz, and 2500–2690 MHz. The structure of the proposed antenna is shown in Figures1, 2, and 3. Figure 1 shows the overall view of the whole antenna. Figure 2 shows the front face of the sectional antenna. Figure 3 shows the back face of the antenna. It consists of a planar monopole antenna with two slots on it and a meandering strip top loaded on the top layer, while a rectangular ground plane, a stub on ground, and two parasitic branches are etched on the bottom layer. The antenna is printed on a substrate with relative permittivity ε
r
=
4.4 and thickness H
=
0.8 mm.Figure 1
The overall view of the whole antenna.Figure 2
The front face of the sectional antenna.Figure 3
Back face of the antenna.In order to achieve multiband characteristic, slotted antenna technology is used without extra space. There are two slots on the monopole patch:L-form slot on the left (slot 1) and L-form slot on the right (slot 2). The monopole patch with two slots on it can generate three resonant frequencies. For LTE’s low frequency band (450–470 MHz), a meandering line is loaded on the monopole patch. At the bottom of the substrate, there are a parasitic patch and a parasitic copper wire. The parasitic patch located at the left back of the monopole is used to adjust the operating bandwidth of slot 2. The parasitic copper wire broadens the operating frequency bandwidth of slot 2 at 2 GHz. The branch on the ground is used to improve the impedance matching of the proposed antenna, especially in the upper frequency band 2500–2690 MHz.Figure4 shows the fabricated antenna after parameter optimization. The antenna is fed by a SMA connecter with 50 Ω impedance. The fed point is put at the right angle of patch. The finally chosen dimensions of the proposed antenna are illustrated in Table 1.Table 1
Parameters of the proposed antenna (units: mm).
L
L
1
L
2
L
3
L
4
L
5
L
6
L
7
200
165
10
15
14
10
13.5
10
L
8
L
9
L
11
L
12
L
13
L
14
L
15
L
16
8
18
6
3
6
9.5
32
37
L
17
L
18
L
19
L
20
L
21
L
30
S
1
S
2
10
20
11
2.5
1
7
8
9
S
3
W
W
1
W
2
W
3
W
4
W
5
W
6
2
100
1
1.5
2
2.6
2.5
1.7
W
7
W
8
W
9
W
10
W
11
K
8
K
9
K
12
2
4
1.5
6
2
20
7.25
1Figure 4
Photograph of the fabricated antenna: (a) overall antenna and (b) sectional antenna.
(a)
(b)


## 3. Study of the Antenna

### 3.1. Operating Mechanism

In order to describe the operating mechanism and the effect of the various portions of the antenna clearly, we have carried out the antenna design process step by step. Figure5 shows the detailed design steps. Figures 6 and 7 show the values of S
11 when the structure of the antenna changes according to the steps in Figure 5.Figure 5
Simulation flows of the designed antenna: (a) the monopole; (b) with left slot; (c) with right slot; (d) with meandering strip; (e) with ground branch; (f) with parasitic copper wire; (g) with parasitic patch.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)Figure 6
SimulatedS
11 of the structures (a), (b), (c), and (d) in Figure 5.Figure 7
SimulatedS
11 of the structures (d), (e), (f), and (g) in Figure 5.From Figures5, 6, and 7, we can see several features. The meandering line generates the lowest operating bandwidth (450–470 MHz). The monopole patch generates the second bandwidth (860–960 MHz). The right slot (slot 2) generates the third bandwidth (1710–2160 MHz), while the left slot (slot 1) generates the fourth (2500–2690 MHz). The branch on the ground extended and improved the impedance bandwidth of both slot 1 and slot 2. The parasitic patch is used to adjust the bandwidths of slot 2, and parasitic copper wire is used to extend the bandwidth of slot 2.To further prove the working principle, the current distributions of the proposed antenna at different working frequencies are shown in Figure8. At 460 MHz, the current mainly located in the meandering strip. At 900 MHz, the current mainly located at the monopole and the meandering strip. At 2000 MHz, the current mainly located in the right slot 2, while, at 2600 MHz, the current mainly located at the left slot 1.Figure 8
Simulated surface-current distributions of the proposed antenna at (a) 460 MHz; (b) 900 MHz; (c) 2000 MHz; (d) 2600 MHz.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


### 3.2. Parameter Study

#### 3.2.1. Monopole Patch Design (Main Parameter:L16)

In this design, the monopole patch is expected to work at 876–960 GHz. According to (1), the wavelength of 900 MHz in FR-4 substrate is approximately 160 mm. Since the length of monopole should be a quarter of the wavelength, we choose 40 mm as the initial length of the monopole patch. Simulations and optimizations were done to obtain the optimal structure. Figure 9 shows that the second operating band decreased as the increasing of L
16 and the optimal length of monopole is 37 mm. Consider (1)
λ
0
=
c
f
ε
r
.Figure 9
The optimization of length of monopole patch.


#### 3.2.2. Meandering Strip Design (Main Parameter:L15)

In order to cover 450–470 MHz, a meandering strip is used. It can maintain the compactness of the proposed antenna. Changing the length of the meandering strip (L
15) can change the resonant frequency and the operating band. The optimization results are shown in Figure 10. It can be seen that the first working frequency band of the antenna decreases with the increasing of L
15. The optimal length of L
15 is 32 mm.Figure 10
The optimization of meandered strip.


#### 3.2.3. Slot 2 Design (Main Parameter:L30)

In the proposed antenna design, we cut slots on the monopole patch to realize multiband characteristic without extra space. In the design, there are two slot antennas on the monopole patch:L-form slot 1 and L-form slot 2. The width of all slots is 1 mm. Figure 11 shows the optimization of L-form slot 2. The value of L
30 influences the third resonant frequency and the optimal length of L
30 is 7 mm.Figure 11
The optimization ofL-form slot 2.


#### 3.2.4. Parasitic Parts and Ground Branch Design (Main Parameter:K8,W7, andL18)

In order to widen the operating frequency bands, two methods are adopted. First, a parasitic patch and a parasitic copper wire were used. Second, a ground branch is designed to improve the impedance matching. The branch on the ground extended and improved the impedance bandwidth of both slot 1 and slot 2. The parasitic patch is used to adjust the bandwidths of slot 2, and parasitic copper wire is used to extend the bandwidth of slot 2.When the length ofK
8 reaches 20.3 mm as shown in Figure 12, the operating band of L-form slot 2 meets the requirement and gets the best situation. The width of the parasitic patch (W
7) adjusts the performance of slot 2 slightly as shown in Figure 13. Figure 14 shows the simulation of the ground branch. When the length the branch (L
18) reaches three quarters of the main body of the antenna, the impedance bandwidth of slot 2 reaches the widest width.Figure 12
The optimization of parasitic copper wire.Figure 13
The optimization of parasitic patch.Figure 14
The optimization of ground branch.


## 3.1. Operating Mechanism

In order to describe the operating mechanism and the effect of the various portions of the antenna clearly, we have carried out the antenna design process step by step. Figure5 shows the detailed design steps. Figures 6 and 7 show the values of S
11 when the structure of the antenna changes according to the steps in Figure 5.Figure 5
Simulation flows of the designed antenna: (a) the monopole; (b) with left slot; (c) with right slot; (d) with meandering strip; (e) with ground branch; (f) with parasitic copper wire; (g) with parasitic patch.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)Figure 6
SimulatedS
11 of the structures (a), (b), (c), and (d) in Figure 5.Figure 7
SimulatedS
11 of the structures (d), (e), (f), and (g) in Figure 5.From Figures5, 6, and 7, we can see several features. The meandering line generates the lowest operating bandwidth (450–470 MHz). The monopole patch generates the second bandwidth (860–960 MHz). The right slot (slot 2) generates the third bandwidth (1710–2160 MHz), while the left slot (slot 1) generates the fourth (2500–2690 MHz). The branch on the ground extended and improved the impedance bandwidth of both slot 1 and slot 2. The parasitic patch is used to adjust the bandwidths of slot 2, and parasitic copper wire is used to extend the bandwidth of slot 2.To further prove the working principle, the current distributions of the proposed antenna at different working frequencies are shown in Figure8. At 460 MHz, the current mainly located in the meandering strip. At 900 MHz, the current mainly located at the monopole and the meandering strip. At 2000 MHz, the current mainly located in the right slot 2, while, at 2600 MHz, the current mainly located at the left slot 1.Figure 8
Simulated surface-current distributions of the proposed antenna at (a) 460 MHz; (b) 900 MHz; (c) 2000 MHz; (d) 2600 MHz.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.2. Parameter Study

### 3.2.1. Monopole Patch Design (Main Parameter:L16)

In this design, the monopole patch is expected to work at 876–960 GHz. According to (1), the wavelength of 900 MHz in FR-4 substrate is approximately 160 mm. Since the length of monopole should be a quarter of the wavelength, we choose 40 mm as the initial length of the monopole patch. Simulations and optimizations were done to obtain the optimal structure. Figure 9 shows that the second operating band decreased as the increasing of L
16 and the optimal length of monopole is 37 mm. Consider (1)
λ
0
=
c
f
ε
r
.Figure 9
The optimization of length of monopole patch.


### 3.2.2. Meandering Strip Design (Main Parameter:L15)

In order to cover 450–470 MHz, a meandering strip is used. It can maintain the compactness of the proposed antenna. Changing the length of the meandering strip (L
15) can change the resonant frequency and the operating band. The optimization results are shown in Figure 10. It can be seen that the first working frequency band of the antenna decreases with the increasing of L
15. The optimal length of L
15 is 32 mm.Figure 10
The optimization of meandered strip.


### 3.2.3. Slot 2 Design (Main Parameter:L30)

In the proposed antenna design, we cut slots on the monopole patch to realize multiband characteristic without extra space. In the design, there are two slot antennas on the monopole patch:L-form slot 1 and L-form slot 2. The width of all slots is 1 mm. Figure 11 shows the optimization of L-form slot 2. The value of L
30 influences the third resonant frequency and the optimal length of L
30 is 7 mm.Figure 11
The optimization ofL-form slot 2.


### 3.2.4. Parasitic Parts and Ground Branch Design (Main Parameter:K8,W7, andL18)

In order to widen the operating frequency bands, two methods are adopted. First, a parasitic patch and a parasitic copper wire were used. Second, a ground branch is designed to improve the impedance matching. The branch on the ground extended and improved the impedance bandwidth of both slot 1 and slot 2. The parasitic patch is used to adjust the bandwidths of slot 2, and parasitic copper wire is used to extend the bandwidth of slot 2.When the length ofK
8 reaches 20.3 mm as shown in Figure 12, the operating band of L-form slot 2 meets the requirement and gets the best situation. The width of the parasitic patch (W
7) adjusts the performance of slot 2 slightly as shown in Figure 13. Figure 14 shows the simulation of the ground branch. When the length the branch (L
18) reaches three quarters of the main body of the antenna, the impedance bandwidth of slot 2 reaches the widest width.Figure 12
The optimization of parasitic copper wire.Figure 13
The optimization of parasitic patch.Figure 14
The optimization of ground branch.


## 3.2.1. Monopole Patch Design (Main Parameter:L16)

In this design, the monopole patch is expected to work at 876–960 GHz. According to (1), the wavelength of 900 MHz in FR-4 substrate is approximately 160 mm. Since the length of monopole should be a quarter of the wavelength, we choose 40 mm as the initial length of the monopole patch. Simulations and optimizations were done to obtain the optimal structure. Figure 9 shows that the second operating band decreased as the increasing of L
16 and the optimal length of monopole is 37 mm. Consider (1)
λ
0
=
c
f
ε
r
.Figure 9
The optimization of length of monopole patch.


## 3.2.2. Meandering Strip Design (Main Parameter:L15)

In order to cover 450–470 MHz, a meandering strip is used. It can maintain the compactness of the proposed antenna. Changing the length of the meandering strip (L
15) can change the resonant frequency and the operating band. The optimization results are shown in Figure 10. It can be seen that the first working frequency band of the antenna decreases with the increasing of L
15. The optimal length of L
15 is 32 mm.Figure 10
The optimization of meandered strip.


## 3.2.3. Slot 2 Design (Main Parameter:L30)

In the proposed antenna design, we cut slots on the monopole patch to realize multiband characteristic without extra space. In the design, there are two slot antennas on the monopole patch:L-form slot 1 and L-form slot 2. The width of all slots is 1 mm. Figure 11 shows the optimization of L-form slot 2. The value of L
30 influences the third resonant frequency and the optimal length of L
30 is 7 mm.Figure 11
The optimization ofL-form slot 2.


## 3.2.4. Parasitic Parts and Ground Branch Design (Main Parameter:K8,W7, andL18)

In order to widen the operating frequency bands, two methods are adopted. First, a parasitic patch and a parasitic copper wire were used. Second, a ground branch is designed to improve the impedance matching. The branch on the ground extended and improved the impedance bandwidth of both slot 1 and slot 2. The parasitic patch is used to adjust the bandwidths of slot 2, and parasitic copper wire is used to extend the bandwidth of slot 2.When the length ofK
8 reaches 20.3 mm as shown in Figure 12, the operating band of L-form slot 2 meets the requirement and gets the best situation. The width of the parasitic patch (W
7) adjusts the performance of slot 2 slightly as shown in Figure 13. Figure 14 shows the simulation of the ground branch. When the length the branch (L
18) reaches three quarters of the main body of the antenna, the impedance bandwidth of slot 2 reaches the widest width.Figure 12
The optimization of parasitic copper wire.Figure 13
The optimization of parasitic patch.Figure 14
The optimization of ground branch.


## 4. Results and Discussion

Simulations and optimizations were performed using Ansoft HFSS software, while the measurements were carried out in a chamber.


### 4.1.S-Parameter

The simulated and measuredS
11 are shown in Figure 15. There are little differences between both of them, and it is mainly due to manufacturing errors. In general, they agree quite well. The measured impedance bandwidths (S
11
<
-
6 dB) cover 450–474 MHz, 860–1040 MHz, 1705–2428 MHz, and 2500–2710 MHz. This indicates that the antenna is suitable for mobile applications working at GSM900 (880–960 MHz), DCS (1710–1880 MHz), PCS (1850–1990 MHz), UMTS (1920–2170 MHz), LTE2500 (2500–2690 MHz), and LTE’s low frequency band (450–470 MHz).Figure 15
Simulated and measuredS
11 of the proposed antenna.


### 4.2. Gain and Efficiency

The measured total efficiency and gain of the proposed antenna are shown in Figures16 and 17. The measured efficiency is higher than 40% and the measured gain is higher than 0 dBi in the frequency bands including 450–470 MHz, 820–1030 MHz, 1690–2170 MHz, and 2520–3000 MHz. These frequency bands cover our target bands.Figure 16
The measured efficiency of the proposed antenna.Figure 17
The measured gain of the proposed antenna.


### 4.3. Radiation Performance

The measured radiation patterns of the proposed antenna are shown in Figures18, 19, 20, and 21, respectively. It can be seen that the proposed antenna has omnidirectional radiation patterns at the working bands, which can meet the demands for mobile terminal antennas.Figure 18
Measured radiation pattern of the proposed antenna at 460 MHz.Figure 19
Measured radiation pattern of the proposed antenna at 900 MHz.Figure 20
Measured radiation pattern of the proposed antenna at 2000 MHz.Figure 21
Measured radiation pattern of the proposed antenna at 2600 MHz.


## 4.1.S-Parameter

The simulated and measuredS
11 are shown in Figure 15. There are little differences between both of them, and it is mainly due to manufacturing errors. In general, they agree quite well. The measured impedance bandwidths (S
11
<
-
6 dB) cover 450–474 MHz, 860–1040 MHz, 1705–2428 MHz, and 2500–2710 MHz. This indicates that the antenna is suitable for mobile applications working at GSM900 (880–960 MHz), DCS (1710–1880 MHz), PCS (1850–1990 MHz), UMTS (1920–2170 MHz), LTE2500 (2500–2690 MHz), and LTE’s low frequency band (450–470 MHz).Figure 15
Simulated and measuredS
11 of the proposed antenna.


## 4.2. Gain and Efficiency

The measured total efficiency and gain of the proposed antenna are shown in Figures16 and 17. The measured efficiency is higher than 40% and the measured gain is higher than 0 dBi in the frequency bands including 450–470 MHz, 820–1030 MHz, 1690–2170 MHz, and 2520–3000 MHz. These frequency bands cover our target bands.Figure 16
The measured efficiency of the proposed antenna.Figure 17
The measured gain of the proposed antenna.


## 4.3. Radiation Performance

The measured radiation patterns of the proposed antenna are shown in Figures18, 19, 20, and 21, respectively. It can be seen that the proposed antenna has omnidirectional radiation patterns at the working bands, which can meet the demands for mobile terminal antennas.Figure 18
Measured radiation pattern of the proposed antenna at 460 MHz.Figure 19
Measured radiation pattern of the proposed antenna at 900 MHz.Figure 20
Measured radiation pattern of the proposed antenna at 2000 MHz.Figure 21
Measured radiation pattern of the proposed antenna at 2600 MHz.


## 5. Conclusion

In this paper, a novel multiband antenna was proposed for mobile terminal applications. The proposed antenna consists of monopole patch with two slots on it, meandering line, parasitic patches, and the ground branch. The antenna can operate at 450–474 MHz, 860–1040 MHz, 1705–2428 MHz, and 2500–2710 MHz, which is over GSM900, DCS, PCS, UMTS, LTE2500, and LTE’s low frequency band. The measurements show that it has good impedance matching. The measured efficiency is higher than 40% and the measured gain is higher than 0 dBi within the whole operating frequency bands. It has omnidirectional radiation patterns. This proposed antenna is suitable for multifunctional terminals.



---

*Source: 591269-2015-10-13.xml*