# Preparation of Novel Chitosan-Starch Blends as Thickening Agent and Their Application in Textile Printing

Authors: E. S. Abdou; H. M. El-Hennawi; K. A. Ahmed
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

Chitosan, a naturally available biopolymer which is now increasingly used as a functional finish on textile substrates to impart antimicrobial characteristics and increase dye uptake of fabrics, was blended with different ratios of gelatinized starch. The chitosan was extracted and characterized by IR,1H-NMR, and X-ray powder diffraction. These blends were tested as thickeners in textile screen printing using Curcuma tinctoria as natural dye. The rheological properties and the viscosity of the printing paste were measured. The effect of chitosan on the printing properties of different fabrics (natural, blends, and synthetic fabrics) was studied by measuring the color strength value (K/S) and related color parameters of the printed fabrics. The antimicrobial properties of printed fabrics were assessed. The results proved that the printed fabrics using these new thickeners showed increase in the color strength value (K/S) giving darker color which means that chitosan increased the dye uptake on fabrics. Fastness properties of the printed fabrics to washing, rubbing, perspiration, and light have also been improved. The treated fabrics were found to be antimicrobial.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Improving the environmental impact and unifying processes as a result of using one class of dyes in coloring fabrics made of blends of chemical and natural fibers is one of the main trends in the evolution of textile dyeing and printing technology.Recently, there has been a revival of interest in natural dyes throughout the world as some synthetic dyes are being banned due to their toxic, carcinogenic, and polluting nature. Most natural dyes need the use of chemicals, called mordant, to help promoting dye absorption and fixing and prevent bleeding and fading of the colors. Mordants form chemical bonds between the dye molecules and the proteins of the fabrics (wool is generally the best fabric colored with natural dyes).Natural dyes are used for food coloring, painting, and textile dyeing [1, 2]. They have shown a greater interest in textile dyeing because they are more ecofriendly than synthetic dyes. Curcumin (1,7-bis(4-hydroxy-3-methoxy phenyl)-1,6-heptadione-3,5-dione) is a yellow pigment present in rhizome of Curcuma longa which is widely used in food industry [3].Treatment of textiles with chitosan which is considered as multifunctional finish not only contributes to its antimicrobial properties but also results in enhancement of color strength thus generating much interest towards chitosan [4–6]. It is also used as an auxiliary in printing of textiles. It has been reported that the printed samples have comparable color fastness to that of commercial printed samples, but chitosan film on fabric surface is not desirable since it causes the problem of fabric stiffness (poor handling) [7, 8].Blending of starch with chitosan results in formation of edible coating with a good film forming and mechanical properties [9]; starch must be gelatinized first before blending with chitosan. Hence the aim of the present study is to investigate the combined effect of chitosan and gelatinized starch as thickening agent in screen printing technique using natural dye and to explore its antimicrobial properties.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

#### 2.1.1. Soluble Starch Was Obtained from Fluka Chemical Company

#### 2.1.2.Curcuma tinctoria Was Purchased from the Local Market

#### 2.1.3. High Viscosity Sodium Alginate from Brown Algae, Manufactured by (Fluka Chemical Company), Was Used as a Thickening Agent

#### 2.1.4. Fabric

(i)
Cotton: mill desized, bleached, and mercerized cotton fabrics (130 g/m2) produced by Misr/Helwan for Spinning and Weaving Company, Egypt.
(ii)
Wool: mill scoured wool fabric (100%) supplied by Misr Co. for Spinning and Weaving, Mehalla El-Kubra, Egypt.
(iii)
Nylon: nylon-6 fabric produced by El-Shourbagy Co. Cairo, Egypt.
(iv)
Polyester: polyester- (PE-) knitted fabric of 150 g/m2, supplied by a private sector company which was treated with a solution containing 1 g/L nonionic detergent at 70°C for 1/2 h, thoroughly washed, and air-dried at room temperature.
(v)
Blend fabrics: different kinds of blended fabrics comprise viscose/polyester (80/20) and cotton/polyester (60/40) were also used.


### 2.2. Methods

#### 2.2.1. Extraction of Chitosan

Chitosan was extracted frommarine shrimp shells. The exoskeletons of the shrimps were crushed and treated in the usual way with HCl, NaOH 1-2 M then with 40% NaOH to extract the chitosan [10]. Chitosan was characterized using the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, 1H-NMR spectroscopy, and X-ray powder diffraction.The degree of deacetylation (DDA%) of chitosan determined by potentiometric titration [11], and the molecular weight was calculated using the value of intrinsic viscosity [12], measured by an Ubbelohde viscometer. The value of (DDA%) and molecular weight of chitosan were 85% and 11.44×104 gm/mol, respectively.


#### 2.2.2. Characterization of Prepared Chitosan

The Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy. The FTIR spectra were measured in KBr pellets in the transmission mode in the range 400–7000 cm−1 using Perkin-Elmer 2000 spectrophotometer. 1H-NMR Spectra.Nuclear magnetic resonance 1H-NMR spectra were measured using JNMAl 300; Jeol spectrometer at 300 MHz in D2O in which drops of DCl was added to enhance solubility. X-Ray Diffraction.X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) was applied to detect the crystallinity of the extracted samples of chitin and their corresponding chitosan. A Scintag powder diffractometer was used for this purpose between 2θ angles of 5° and 40°. Ni-filtered Cu K α-radiation was used as the X-ray source. The relative crystallinity of the polymers was calculated by dividing the area of the crystalline peaks by the total area under the curve.


#### 2.2.3. Gelatinization of Starch Solution in Microwave

Starch was gelatinized first in microwave before blending with chitosan. Starch samples with predetermined starch concentrations, were prepared by using soluble starch and distilled water, and the samples were stirred gently just before heating them in the microwave oven in order to ensure that the starch was fully suspended in the water. The starch ratio in the prepared samples was 3, 4, 5, and 6%. Then starch samples (150 mL) were heated at full power in the microwave oven WP800 for 2 minutes.


#### 2.2.4. Blend Formation

Chitosan was blended with all the prepared gelatinized starch with fixed ratio 1% of the starch samples.


#### 2.2.5. Preparation of Printing Paste

The suitability of chitosan and gelatinized starch blends as thickening agents in screen printing technique was investigated usingCurcuma tinctoria as natural dye.To achieve this goal, different printing paste using the new thickeners and another one with sodium alginate as thickening agent for the sake of comparison were prepared according to the recipe givenin Table 1.Table 1
Thickening agent(Sod.alginate suspension or chitosan-starch blends)
500 g
Curcuma tinctoria
30 g
Urea
100 g
Water
370 g
1000 gSodium alginate was first soaked in small amount of water overnight at room temperature before preparing the printing paste. The natural color and urea were then added on the thickener suspension as in the recipe mention then the total weight of the whole paste was adjusted to one kilogram with the addition of the necessary amount of water. All the printed samples except the wool samples were fixed via thermofixation at 160°C for 5 min. The wool printed samples were fixed by steaming at 100°C for 10 min after fixation the printed samples were washed as follows.(i)
Washing with cold running water.(ii)
Soaping (using 2 g/L nonionic detergent namely Espycon 1030) at 45°C for 15 minutes.(iii)
Rinsing with cold water.At this end the printed fabrics were dried and assessed for color strength value (K/S) and over all fastness properties.


#### 2.2.6. Rheological Properties

Rheological properties of chitosan/gelatinous-starch blends were studied using Brookfield Digital Rheometer, model HA DVIII Ultra (Brookfield Engineering Laboratories INC.), with spindle no. SC4-21 [13]. The rheological parameters for starch-chitosan blends were measured at room temperature.


#### 2.2.7. Determination of Color Strength and Related Parameters

The color strength of the printed samples was evaluated by Hunter Lab Ultra scan PRO. atλmax.The color difference and relative color strength % between chitosan/starch printed samples and control samples were also obtained using the following relationships.Relative color strength (%) = (K/S of chitosan/starch blend)/(K/S of control sample)×100:
(1)ΔE=(ΔL)2+(Δa)2+(Δb)2whereΔL=L-L*;Δa=a-a*;Δb=b-b*.
“L” describes lightness; “a” measures redness or greenness “b” measures yellowness or blueness; where L*, a*, and b* are color parameters of control sample.


#### 2.2.8. Determination of Fastness Properties

The treated samples were washed as per the conditions specified in the test AATCC test method [14]. The color fastness to rubbing, perspiration,  and light was determined according to the AATCC test methods [15–17].


#### 2.2.9. Antibacterial Activity

The Antibacterial activity was assayed in the Microanalytical Centre of Cairo University using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method [18].


## 2.1. Materials

### 2.1.1. Soluble Starch Was Obtained from Fluka Chemical Company

### 2.1.2.Curcuma tinctoria Was Purchased from the Local Market

### 2.1.3. High Viscosity Sodium Alginate from Brown Algae, Manufactured by (Fluka Chemical Company), Was Used as a Thickening Agent

### 2.1.4. Fabric

(i)
Cotton: mill desized, bleached, and mercerized cotton fabrics (130 g/m2) produced by Misr/Helwan for Spinning and Weaving Company, Egypt.
(ii)
Wool: mill scoured wool fabric (100%) supplied by Misr Co. for Spinning and Weaving, Mehalla El-Kubra, Egypt.
(iii)
Nylon: nylon-6 fabric produced by El-Shourbagy Co. Cairo, Egypt.
(iv)
Polyester: polyester- (PE-) knitted fabric of 150 g/m2, supplied by a private sector company which was treated with a solution containing 1 g/L nonionic detergent at 70°C for 1/2 h, thoroughly washed, and air-dried at room temperature.
(v)
Blend fabrics: different kinds of blended fabrics comprise viscose/polyester (80/20) and cotton/polyester (60/40) were also used.


## 2.1.1. Soluble Starch Was Obtained from Fluka Chemical Company

## 2.1.2.Curcuma tinctoria Was Purchased from the Local Market

## 2.1.3. High Viscosity Sodium Alginate from Brown Algae, Manufactured by (Fluka Chemical Company), Was Used as a Thickening Agent

## 2.1.4. Fabric

(i)
Cotton: mill desized, bleached, and mercerized cotton fabrics (130 g/m2) produced by Misr/Helwan for Spinning and Weaving Company, Egypt.
(ii)
Wool: mill scoured wool fabric (100%) supplied by Misr Co. for Spinning and Weaving, Mehalla El-Kubra, Egypt.
(iii)
Nylon: nylon-6 fabric produced by El-Shourbagy Co. Cairo, Egypt.
(iv)
Polyester: polyester- (PE-) knitted fabric of 150 g/m2, supplied by a private sector company which was treated with a solution containing 1 g/L nonionic detergent at 70°C for 1/2 h, thoroughly washed, and air-dried at room temperature.
(v)
Blend fabrics: different kinds of blended fabrics comprise viscose/polyester (80/20) and cotton/polyester (60/40) were also used.


## 2.2. Methods

### 2.2.1. Extraction of Chitosan

Chitosan was extracted frommarine shrimp shells. The exoskeletons of the shrimps were crushed and treated in the usual way with HCl, NaOH 1-2 M then with 40% NaOH to extract the chitosan [10]. Chitosan was characterized using the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, 1H-NMR spectroscopy, and X-ray powder diffraction.The degree of deacetylation (DDA%) of chitosan determined by potentiometric titration [11], and the molecular weight was calculated using the value of intrinsic viscosity [12], measured by an Ubbelohde viscometer. The value of (DDA%) and molecular weight of chitosan were 85% and 11.44×104 gm/mol, respectively.


### 2.2.2. Characterization of Prepared Chitosan

The Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy. The FTIR spectra were measured in KBr pellets in the transmission mode in the range 400–7000 cm−1 using Perkin-Elmer 2000 spectrophotometer. 1H-NMR Spectra.Nuclear magnetic resonance 1H-NMR spectra were measured using JNMAl 300; Jeol spectrometer at 300 MHz in D2O in which drops of DCl was added to enhance solubility. X-Ray Diffraction.X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) was applied to detect the crystallinity of the extracted samples of chitin and their corresponding chitosan. A Scintag powder diffractometer was used for this purpose between 2θ angles of 5° and 40°. Ni-filtered Cu K α-radiation was used as the X-ray source. The relative crystallinity of the polymers was calculated by dividing the area of the crystalline peaks by the total area under the curve.


### 2.2.3. Gelatinization of Starch Solution in Microwave

Starch was gelatinized first in microwave before blending with chitosan. Starch samples with predetermined starch concentrations, were prepared by using soluble starch and distilled water, and the samples were stirred gently just before heating them in the microwave oven in order to ensure that the starch was fully suspended in the water. The starch ratio in the prepared samples was 3, 4, 5, and 6%. Then starch samples (150 mL) were heated at full power in the microwave oven WP800 for 2 minutes.


### 2.2.4. Blend Formation

Chitosan was blended with all the prepared gelatinized starch with fixed ratio 1% of the starch samples.


### 2.2.5. Preparation of Printing Paste

The suitability of chitosan and gelatinized starch blends as thickening agents in screen printing technique was investigated usingCurcuma tinctoria as natural dye.To achieve this goal, different printing paste using the new thickeners and another one with sodium alginate as thickening agent for the sake of comparison were prepared according to the recipe givenin Table 1.Table 1
Thickening agent(Sod.alginate suspension or chitosan-starch blends)
500 g
Curcuma tinctoria
30 g
Urea
100 g
Water
370 g
1000 gSodium alginate was first soaked in small amount of water overnight at room temperature before preparing the printing paste. The natural color and urea were then added on the thickener suspension as in the recipe mention then the total weight of the whole paste was adjusted to one kilogram with the addition of the necessary amount of water. All the printed samples except the wool samples were fixed via thermofixation at 160°C for 5 min. The wool printed samples were fixed by steaming at 100°C for 10 min after fixation the printed samples were washed as follows.(i)
Washing with cold running water.(ii)
Soaping (using 2 g/L nonionic detergent namely Espycon 1030) at 45°C for 15 minutes.(iii)
Rinsing with cold water.At this end the printed fabrics were dried and assessed for color strength value (K/S) and over all fastness properties.


### 2.2.6. Rheological Properties

Rheological properties of chitosan/gelatinous-starch blends were studied using Brookfield Digital Rheometer, model HA DVIII Ultra (Brookfield Engineering Laboratories INC.), with spindle no. SC4-21 [13]. The rheological parameters for starch-chitosan blends were measured at room temperature.


### 2.2.7. Determination of Color Strength and Related Parameters

The color strength of the printed samples was evaluated by Hunter Lab Ultra scan PRO. atλmax.The color difference and relative color strength % between chitosan/starch printed samples and control samples were also obtained using the following relationships.Relative color strength (%) = (K/S of chitosan/starch blend)/(K/S of control sample)×100:
(1)ΔE=(ΔL)2+(Δa)2+(Δb)2whereΔL=L-L*;Δa=a-a*;Δb=b-b*.
“L” describes lightness; “a” measures redness or greenness “b” measures yellowness or blueness; where L*, a*, and b* are color parameters of control sample.


### 2.2.8. Determination of Fastness Properties

The treated samples were washed as per the conditions specified in the test AATCC test method [14]. The color fastness to rubbing, perspiration,  and light was determined according to the AATCC test methods [15–17].


### 2.2.9. Antibacterial Activity

The Antibacterial activity was assayed in the Microanalytical Centre of Cairo University using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method [18].


## 2.2.1. Extraction of Chitosan

Chitosan was extracted frommarine shrimp shells. The exoskeletons of the shrimps were crushed and treated in the usual way with HCl, NaOH 1-2 M then with 40% NaOH to extract the chitosan [10]. Chitosan was characterized using the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, 1H-NMR spectroscopy, and X-ray powder diffraction.The degree of deacetylation (DDA%) of chitosan determined by potentiometric titration [11], and the molecular weight was calculated using the value of intrinsic viscosity [12], measured by an Ubbelohde viscometer. The value of (DDA%) and molecular weight of chitosan were 85% and 11.44×104 gm/mol, respectively.


## 2.2.2. Characterization of Prepared Chitosan

The Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy. The FTIR spectra were measured in KBr pellets in the transmission mode in the range 400–7000 cm−1 using Perkin-Elmer 2000 spectrophotometer. 1H-NMR Spectra.Nuclear magnetic resonance 1H-NMR spectra were measured using JNMAl 300; Jeol spectrometer at 300 MHz in D2O in which drops of DCl was added to enhance solubility. X-Ray Diffraction.X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) was applied to detect the crystallinity of the extracted samples of chitin and their corresponding chitosan. A Scintag powder diffractometer was used for this purpose between 2θ angles of 5° and 40°. Ni-filtered Cu K α-radiation was used as the X-ray source. The relative crystallinity of the polymers was calculated by dividing the area of the crystalline peaks by the total area under the curve.


## 2.2.3. Gelatinization of Starch Solution in Microwave

Starch was gelatinized first in microwave before blending with chitosan. Starch samples with predetermined starch concentrations, were prepared by using soluble starch and distilled water, and the samples were stirred gently just before heating them in the microwave oven in order to ensure that the starch was fully suspended in the water. The starch ratio in the prepared samples was 3, 4, 5, and 6%. Then starch samples (150 mL) were heated at full power in the microwave oven WP800 for 2 minutes.


## 2.2.4. Blend Formation

Chitosan was blended with all the prepared gelatinized starch with fixed ratio 1% of the starch samples.


## 2.2.5. Preparation of Printing Paste

The suitability of chitosan and gelatinized starch blends as thickening agents in screen printing technique was investigated usingCurcuma tinctoria as natural dye.To achieve this goal, different printing paste using the new thickeners and another one with sodium alginate as thickening agent for the sake of comparison were prepared according to the recipe givenin Table 1.Table 1
Thickening agent(Sod.alginate suspension or chitosan-starch blends)
500 g
Curcuma tinctoria
30 g
Urea
100 g
Water
370 g
1000 gSodium alginate was first soaked in small amount of water overnight at room temperature before preparing the printing paste. The natural color and urea were then added on the thickener suspension as in the recipe mention then the total weight of the whole paste was adjusted to one kilogram with the addition of the necessary amount of water. All the printed samples except the wool samples were fixed via thermofixation at 160°C for 5 min. The wool printed samples were fixed by steaming at 100°C for 10 min after fixation the printed samples were washed as follows.(i)
Washing with cold running water.(ii)
Soaping (using 2 g/L nonionic detergent namely Espycon 1030) at 45°C for 15 minutes.(iii)
Rinsing with cold water.At this end the printed fabrics were dried and assessed for color strength value (K/S) and over all fastness properties.


## 2.2.6. Rheological Properties

Rheological properties of chitosan/gelatinous-starch blends were studied using Brookfield Digital Rheometer, model HA DVIII Ultra (Brookfield Engineering Laboratories INC.), with spindle no. SC4-21 [13]. The rheological parameters for starch-chitosan blends were measured at room temperature.


## 2.2.7. Determination of Color Strength and Related Parameters

The color strength of the printed samples was evaluated by Hunter Lab Ultra scan PRO. atλmax.The color difference and relative color strength % between chitosan/starch printed samples and control samples were also obtained using the following relationships.Relative color strength (%) = (K/S of chitosan/starch blend)/(K/S of control sample)×100:
(1)ΔE=(ΔL)2+(Δa)2+(Δb)2whereΔL=L-L*;Δa=a-a*;Δb=b-b*.
“L” describes lightness; “a” measures redness or greenness “b” measures yellowness or blueness; where L*, a*, and b* are color parameters of control sample.


## 2.2.8. Determination of Fastness Properties

The treated samples were washed as per the conditions specified in the test AATCC test method [14]. The color fastness to rubbing, perspiration,  and light was determined according to the AATCC test methods [15–17].


## 2.2.9. Antibacterial Activity

The Antibacterial activity was assayed in the Microanalytical Centre of Cairo University using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method [18].


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. FTIR Spectra

The FTIR spectra of chitosan represent a  characteristic band at 3424 cm−1 which is attributed to –NH2 and –OH groups stretching vibration, the band for amide at 1654 cm−1, and the aliphatic C–H stretching between 2921 and 2876 cm−1, When starch and chitosan are mixed, physical blends versus chemical interactions are reflected by changes in characteristic spectra peaks In the typical spectrum of chitosan/starch composite film, the amino peak of chitosan shifted from 1578 to 1584 cm−1 with the addition of starch). This result indicated that interactions were present between the hydroxyl groups of starch and the amino groups of chitosan [19, 20].


### 3.2.1H-NMR Method

The chemical shift of methyl protons in acetamide group to appear at 2.07 ppm in acidic deuterium oxide solutions while the methyl group of glacial acetic acid appears at 2.12 ppm (The Aldrich Library of NMR Spectra). Therefore, the peak around 2.1 ppm can be safely assigned to the methyl protons in the acetamide group, and that around 2.2 ppm is due to the methyl group in acetic acid moiety.  The chemical shift is affected by solvent type, concentration and temperature, and taking these into account, one can explain the difference between the chemical shift value reported by Shen et al. [21], and those reported here.In the obtained spectra, the difference in chemical shifts between peaks at about 2.1 and 2.2 ppm is constant (about 0.15 ppm) within the experimental errors. The setting of TMS peak to be 0 ppm is sometimes slightly affected by operational and spectral variations, and for peaks with many “spikes” as in our case, the reproducibility might be lowered. Therefore, it can be safely stated that the chemical shift for amide methyl protons can be set to 2.06 ppm and that for acetic acid moiety to 2.21 ppm.


### 3.3. X-Ray Diffraction

X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was applied to detect the crystallinity of the isolated chitin and the obtained chitosan The structure ofα-chitin has been determined [22] using X-ray diffraction analysis, based on the intensity data from deproteinized lobster tendon. Least-squares refinement shows that adjacent chains have alternating sense (i.e., are antiparallel). In addition, there is a statistical distribution of side chain orientations, such that all the hydroxyl groups form hydrogen bonds. The unit cell is orthorhombic.The chains form hydrogen bonded sheets linked by C=O⋯H- - -N bonds approximately parallel to the a-axis, and each chain has an O-3′- - -H⋯O.5 intramolecular hydrogen bond, similar to that in cellulose. The results indicate also that a statistical mixture of CH2OH orientations is present, equivalent to half oxygen on each residue, each forming inter- and intramolecular hydrogen bonds. As a result, the structure contains two types of amide groups, which differ in their hydrogen bonding, and account for the splitting of the amide I band in the infrared spectrum. The inability of this chitin polymorph to swell on soaking in water is explained by the extensive intermolecular hydrogen bonding.


### 3.4. Rheological Properties

The rheological behavior of the printing paste plays one of the most important roles in the process of textile printing because it affects the amount of printing paste applied on the textile surface and consequently on the quality of the printed substrate. Hence, pastes of the aforementioned blends were prepared and the rheological properties of the pastes were monitored before and after storing of the pastes for 24 h. The results obtained are shown in Figures1 and 2.Figure 1
Rheograms of different concentrations of fresh-preparedstarch/chitosan thickener.Figure 2
Rheograms of different concentrations of starch/chitosan thickener after storing for 24 hours.The rheograms reveal that all the pastes under investigation display non-Newtonian pseudoplastic behavior since the ascending and descending rheograms are coincident. This reveals the homogeneity of the molecular structure of the pastes which are amenable to rebuild themselves and retain their original state immediately after removal of the acting force, thereby exhibiting pseudoplastic behavior.Figure1 shows that, the location of the rheograms with respect to the rate of shear axis depends on the nature of the thickening agent used. As the concentration of starch increases the rheogram is located far from the rate of shear axis indicating an increase in the apparent viscosity.Figure2 represents the rheograms of the aforementioned pastes after storing for 24 h. It is clear from the rheograms that storing has practically no effect on the rheological characteristics of these pastes where each of these pastes remains exhibiting non-Newtonian pseudoplastic behavior after storing.The apparent viscosity at various rate of shear of the aforementioned pastes was calculated from the values of rate of shear. The results obtained are given in Tables2 and 3. It is clear that the storing for 24 h does not affect so much the appearing viscosity of the prepared pastes.Table 2
Effect of starch concentration on the apparent viscosity at various rate of shear for freshly prepared pastes.
Rate of shear (sec−1)
Apparent viscosity
3% starch
4% starch
5% starch
6% starch
9.3
190
250
430
820
18.6
180
240
415
760
27.9
173.3
236.7
406.7
730
37.2
166
230
395
700
46.5
161.7
226
386
672
55.8
160
223.3
378.3
651
65.1
155
220
368.6
634.3
74.4
153.3
217.5
361.2
616.2
83.7
152
214.4
354.4
601.1
93
152
212
347
587
93
152.2
210
349
587
83.7
152.5
212.2
348
600
74.4
152.9
215
352.5
617.5
65.7
155
217.1
358.6
634.3
55.8
155
220
365
655
46.5
156
222
370
660
27.9
157.5
225
380
710
37.2
158.7
230
390
750
18.6
160
235
400
795
9.3
163
240
410
870Table 3
Effect of starch concentration on the apparent viscosity at various rate of shear for prepared pastes after storing 24 hours.
Rate of shear (sec−1)
Apparent viscosity
3% starch
4% starch
5% starch
6% starch
9.3
150
260
500
1070
18.6
145
243
475
955
27.9
140
236.7
458.7
903.3
37.2
140
230
442.5
890
46.5
130
226
428
864
55.8
136.7
221.7
418
850
65.1
135.7
218.6
408.6
840
74.4
133.7
215
400
853
83.7
133.7
212.2
392.2
830.8
93
133
210
386
814
93
132.
210
385
802
83.7
132.2
212.2
391.1
822.2
74.4
132.5
215
398.7
825
65.1
132.9
217.1
407
788
55.8
133.3
221.7
416.7
765
46.7
136
224
426
750
27.9
137.5
230
137.5
787.5
37.2
136.7
233.3
453.3
833
18.6
140
240
470
905
9.3
150
250
500
1010


### 3.5. Color Strength and Related Parameters

Chitosan has been proved to increase the rate of dye uptake and dye exhaustion of wool fabrics in the case of acid, reactive dyes and natural dye as henna [5, 23, 24]. However, combination of starch with chitosan to be used as thickening agent in textile printing has not been investigated so far. Therefore it has been taken up in the present study with natural dye. Thickeners act as a vehicle for the dye and during the fixation the dye transferred into the fabric then the thickener is washed off completely from the fabric. K/S value is directly proportional to the amount of dye present in the material and it can be used to evaluate the efficiency of new thickeners. The K/S values and the relative color strength % of Curcuma tinctoria printed samples are given in Table 4.Table 4
The K/S, relative color strength % ofCurcuma tinctoria printed samples.
Thickener used
Kind of fabric used
Cotton
Cotton/polyester
Polyester
Viscose/polyester
Polyamide
Wool
K/S
% K/S
K/S
% K/S
K/S
% K/S
K/S
% K/S
K/S
% K/S
K/S
% K/S
Sod. alginate
3.88
100
1.91
100
0.98
100
4.24
100
1.44
100
2.01
100
3% starch
6.46
167
7.45
390
5.01
511
8.15
192
5.74
399
9
474
4% starch
9.61
248
11.42
598
5.04
514
7.92
187
7.04
488
8.12
404
5% starch
7.94
205
5.93
311
5.12
523
7.06
167
7.94
551
6.57
327
6% starch
5.81
150
3.48
182
4.97
201
6.97
164
6.32
439
5.66
282It is clear from Table4, that the K/S and the relative color strength % values of all the printed samples using starch/chitosan thickeners are higher than that of the standard samples. These results further affirm that chitosan increases the amount of Curcuma tinctoria uptake. This holds true in all printed samples despite the nature of fabric used and the % of starch in the thickener.It is known that all natural dye have low affinity to synthetic fabrics and this was one of its drawback especially with the increase in production of synthetic fabrics and their blends. The K/S values of the printed synthetic fabrics and their blends reveal that the presence of this ratio of chitosan in the new thickeners has overcome this problem. Cotton/polyester printed samples achieved the highest relative color % 598, where the K/S increases from 1.91 to 11.42 using 4% starch/chitosan thickener. The K/S of others synthetic printed fabrics (polyester and polyamide) increase from 0.98 to 5.12 and from 1.44 to 7.94 with relative color strength % 523 and 551, respectively, using 5% starch/chitosan thickener. For natural fabric as wool the highest K/S was achieved by using 3% starch/chitosan blend.  These results refer that the highest K/S values have been achieved at different blends although the ratio of chitosan is constant, this may be due to the nature of the fabrics and the thickener viscosity.To evaluate the color parameter and the color difference of printed fabrics with highest K/S value, CIE Lab system is used. WhereL refers to lightness-darkness values from 100 to 0 representing white to black, values run from negative (green) to positive (red) and b values run from negative (blue) to positive (yellow), and the total color difference is given by ΔE.It can be seen from Table5 that the L values decrease in all the printed samples indicating that the sample becomes darker compared to that of the control sample. As seen from a and b values that the color hue changes to reddish yellow.Table 5
Color parameter and the color difference of printed Fabrics.
Printed sample
L
*
a
*
b
*
L
a
b
ΔL
Δa
Δb
ΔE
C
a
*
b
*
C
a
b
Wool
76.22
−1.85
47.68
63.53
9.72
55.63
−12.69
11.57
7.95
50.83
47.7
56.4
Polyamide
67.42
−4.44
16.29
64.53
−5.56
57.30
−2.96
1.12
41.01
41.13
16.8
17.7
Polyester
83.96
−7.36
15.39
74.03
−5.39
63.21
−9.93
1.97
47.82
48.88
17.0
63.4
Cotton/polyester
77.81
−2.16
41.39
67.50
11.48
49.02
−10.31
13.46
7.81
18.66
41.4
50.3
Cotton
85.15
−4.14
13.6
70.54
6.64
62.82
−14.61
10.78
49.22
51.71
14.2
63.1
Viscose/polyester
80.91
−4.93
22.02
72.63
2.38
58.51
−8.28
7.31
36.49
38.13
22.5
58.5The color difference (ΔE) values are also given in Table 5 and it can be clearly seen that there is a significant color difference between the samples and the control samples though the dye concentration is constant.The chroma is calculated as(a2+b2)1/2 as the chromaticity increases, a color becomes more intense; as it decreases a color becomes dull and this is clear from Table 5 that the chroma of sample (Cab) increased.


### 3.6. Determination of Fastness Properties and Surface Roughness

It is clear from the data of Table6 that with this new thickeners natural dye could print all kinds of fabrics under investigation with very good to excellent color fastness to rubbing, washing or perspiration. The notice of improvement is in the light fastness.Table 6
Fastness properties of control and highest K/S samples and surface roughness of fabrics.
Printing paste
Rubbing fastness
Washing fastness
Perspiration fastness
Light fastness
Roughness
Dry
Wet
Alt.
St.
Acid
Alkaline
Alt.
St.
Alt
St.
Cotton fabric (100%)
Commercial paste
4-5
4
4
4
4
4-5
4
4
1
13.01
5% starch/chitosan
4-5
3
4
4
4
4-5
4
4
3
13.11
Cotton/polyester blend fabric (35/65)
Commercial paste
4-5
4-5
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
16.78
6% starch/chitosan
4-5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3-4
12.17
Viscose/polyester (80/20)
Commercial paste
4-5
4-5
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
15.64
5% starch/chitosan
4-5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
15.65
Polyester
Commercial paste
4-5
4-5
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
18.62
6% Starch/chitosan
4-5
4-5
4
4
4
4
4
4
3-4
18.73
Polyamide
Commercial paste
4-5
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
24.67
4-5
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3-4
18.49
Wool
Commercial paste
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
25.01
6% Starch/chitosan
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
25.00The surface properties of the antistatic-treated fabrics are very important because these fabrics are used mainly for garments in direct contact with human skin, that surface roughness has strong effect on the wearer comfort. Surface roughness results of cotton, polyester, polyamide, and blend fabrics are given in Table6. The results showed the same or slight increase in the surface roughness of the using chitosan/starch blend compared with the standard.


### 3.7. Antimicrobial Activity of Treated Fabrics

Early research describing the antimicrobial potential of chitin, chitosan, and their derivatives dated from the 1980–1990s [25]. Generally, recent data in the literature has the tendency to characterize chitosan as bacteriostatic rather than bactericidal.Table7 shows that the printed fabrics using chitosan-starch blend exhibit antimicrobial characteristics compared with the control sample.Table 7
Antibacterial activity of different printed fabrics.
Sample
Inhibition zone diameter (mm/mg sample)
Bacillus subtilis (G+)
Esherichia coli (G−)
Staphylococcus aureus(G+)
pseudomonas aeruginosa gram
(G−)
Control
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Cotton
14
14
15
14
Cotton/polyester
15
15
15
16
Viscose/polyester
15
16
15
16
wool
16
16
15
16


## 3.1. FTIR Spectra

The FTIR spectra of chitosan represent a  characteristic band at 3424 cm−1 which is attributed to –NH2 and –OH groups stretching vibration, the band for amide at 1654 cm−1, and the aliphatic C–H stretching between 2921 and 2876 cm−1, When starch and chitosan are mixed, physical blends versus chemical interactions are reflected by changes in characteristic spectra peaks In the typical spectrum of chitosan/starch composite film, the amino peak of chitosan shifted from 1578 to 1584 cm−1 with the addition of starch). This result indicated that interactions were present between the hydroxyl groups of starch and the amino groups of chitosan [19, 20].


## 3.2.1H-NMR Method

The chemical shift of methyl protons in acetamide group to appear at 2.07 ppm in acidic deuterium oxide solutions while the methyl group of glacial acetic acid appears at 2.12 ppm (The Aldrich Library of NMR Spectra). Therefore, the peak around 2.1 ppm can be safely assigned to the methyl protons in the acetamide group, and that around 2.2 ppm is due to the methyl group in acetic acid moiety.  The chemical shift is affected by solvent type, concentration and temperature, and taking these into account, one can explain the difference between the chemical shift value reported by Shen et al. [21], and those reported here.In the obtained spectra, the difference in chemical shifts between peaks at about 2.1 and 2.2 ppm is constant (about 0.15 ppm) within the experimental errors. The setting of TMS peak to be 0 ppm is sometimes slightly affected by operational and spectral variations, and for peaks with many “spikes” as in our case, the reproducibility might be lowered. Therefore, it can be safely stated that the chemical shift for amide methyl protons can be set to 2.06 ppm and that for acetic acid moiety to 2.21 ppm.


## 3.3. X-Ray Diffraction

X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was applied to detect the crystallinity of the isolated chitin and the obtained chitosan The structure ofα-chitin has been determined [22] using X-ray diffraction analysis, based on the intensity data from deproteinized lobster tendon. Least-squares refinement shows that adjacent chains have alternating sense (i.e., are antiparallel). In addition, there is a statistical distribution of side chain orientations, such that all the hydroxyl groups form hydrogen bonds. The unit cell is orthorhombic.The chains form hydrogen bonded sheets linked by C=O⋯H- - -N bonds approximately parallel to the a-axis, and each chain has an O-3′- - -H⋯O.5 intramolecular hydrogen bond, similar to that in cellulose. The results indicate also that a statistical mixture of CH2OH orientations is present, equivalent to half oxygen on each residue, each forming inter- and intramolecular hydrogen bonds. As a result, the structure contains two types of amide groups, which differ in their hydrogen bonding, and account for the splitting of the amide I band in the infrared spectrum. The inability of this chitin polymorph to swell on soaking in water is explained by the extensive intermolecular hydrogen bonding.


## 3.4. Rheological Properties

The rheological behavior of the printing paste plays one of the most important roles in the process of textile printing because it affects the amount of printing paste applied on the textile surface and consequently on the quality of the printed substrate. Hence, pastes of the aforementioned blends were prepared and the rheological properties of the pastes were monitored before and after storing of the pastes for 24 h. The results obtained are shown in Figures1 and 2.Figure 1
Rheograms of different concentrations of fresh-preparedstarch/chitosan thickener.Figure 2
Rheograms of different concentrations of starch/chitosan thickener after storing for 24 hours.The rheograms reveal that all the pastes under investigation display non-Newtonian pseudoplastic behavior since the ascending and descending rheograms are coincident. This reveals the homogeneity of the molecular structure of the pastes which are amenable to rebuild themselves and retain their original state immediately after removal of the acting force, thereby exhibiting pseudoplastic behavior.Figure1 shows that, the location of the rheograms with respect to the rate of shear axis depends on the nature of the thickening agent used. As the concentration of starch increases the rheogram is located far from the rate of shear axis indicating an increase in the apparent viscosity.Figure2 represents the rheograms of the aforementioned pastes after storing for 24 h. It is clear from the rheograms that storing has practically no effect on the rheological characteristics of these pastes where each of these pastes remains exhibiting non-Newtonian pseudoplastic behavior after storing.The apparent viscosity at various rate of shear of the aforementioned pastes was calculated from the values of rate of shear. The results obtained are given in Tables2 and 3. It is clear that the storing for 24 h does not affect so much the appearing viscosity of the prepared pastes.Table 2
Effect of starch concentration on the apparent viscosity at various rate of shear for freshly prepared pastes.
Rate of shear (sec−1)
Apparent viscosity
3% starch
4% starch
5% starch
6% starch
9.3
190
250
430
820
18.6
180
240
415
760
27.9
173.3
236.7
406.7
730
37.2
166
230
395
700
46.5
161.7
226
386
672
55.8
160
223.3
378.3
651
65.1
155
220
368.6
634.3
74.4
153.3
217.5
361.2
616.2
83.7
152
214.4
354.4
601.1
93
152
212
347
587
93
152.2
210
349
587
83.7
152.5
212.2
348
600
74.4
152.9
215
352.5
617.5
65.7
155
217.1
358.6
634.3
55.8
155
220
365
655
46.5
156
222
370
660
27.9
157.5
225
380
710
37.2
158.7
230
390
750
18.6
160
235
400
795
9.3
163
240
410
870Table 3
Effect of starch concentration on the apparent viscosity at various rate of shear for prepared pastes after storing 24 hours.
Rate of shear (sec−1)
Apparent viscosity
3% starch
4% starch
5% starch
6% starch
9.3
150
260
500
1070
18.6
145
243
475
955
27.9
140
236.7
458.7
903.3
37.2
140
230
442.5
890
46.5
130
226
428
864
55.8
136.7
221.7
418
850
65.1
135.7
218.6
408.6
840
74.4
133.7
215
400
853
83.7
133.7
212.2
392.2
830.8
93
133
210
386
814
93
132.
210
385
802
83.7
132.2
212.2
391.1
822.2
74.4
132.5
215
398.7
825
65.1
132.9
217.1
407
788
55.8
133.3
221.7
416.7
765
46.7
136
224
426
750
27.9
137.5
230
137.5
787.5
37.2
136.7
233.3
453.3
833
18.6
140
240
470
905
9.3
150
250
500
1010


## 3.5. Color Strength and Related Parameters

Chitosan has been proved to increase the rate of dye uptake and dye exhaustion of wool fabrics in the case of acid, reactive dyes and natural dye as henna [5, 23, 24]. However, combination of starch with chitosan to be used as thickening agent in textile printing has not been investigated so far. Therefore it has been taken up in the present study with natural dye. Thickeners act as a vehicle for the dye and during the fixation the dye transferred into the fabric then the thickener is washed off completely from the fabric. K/S value is directly proportional to the amount of dye present in the material and it can be used to evaluate the efficiency of new thickeners. The K/S values and the relative color strength % of Curcuma tinctoria printed samples are given in Table 4.Table 4
The K/S, relative color strength % ofCurcuma tinctoria printed samples.
Thickener used
Kind of fabric used
Cotton
Cotton/polyester
Polyester
Viscose/polyester
Polyamide
Wool
K/S
% K/S
K/S
% K/S
K/S
% K/S
K/S
% K/S
K/S
% K/S
K/S
% K/S
Sod. alginate
3.88
100
1.91
100
0.98
100
4.24
100
1.44
100
2.01
100
3% starch
6.46
167
7.45
390
5.01
511
8.15
192
5.74
399
9
474
4% starch
9.61
248
11.42
598
5.04
514
7.92
187
7.04
488
8.12
404
5% starch
7.94
205
5.93
311
5.12
523
7.06
167
7.94
551
6.57
327
6% starch
5.81
150
3.48
182
4.97
201
6.97
164
6.32
439
5.66
282It is clear from Table4, that the K/S and the relative color strength % values of all the printed samples using starch/chitosan thickeners are higher than that of the standard samples. These results further affirm that chitosan increases the amount of Curcuma tinctoria uptake. This holds true in all printed samples despite the nature of fabric used and the % of starch in the thickener.It is known that all natural dye have low affinity to synthetic fabrics and this was one of its drawback especially with the increase in production of synthetic fabrics and their blends. The K/S values of the printed synthetic fabrics and their blends reveal that the presence of this ratio of chitosan in the new thickeners has overcome this problem. Cotton/polyester printed samples achieved the highest relative color % 598, where the K/S increases from 1.91 to 11.42 using 4% starch/chitosan thickener. The K/S of others synthetic printed fabrics (polyester and polyamide) increase from 0.98 to 5.12 and from 1.44 to 7.94 with relative color strength % 523 and 551, respectively, using 5% starch/chitosan thickener. For natural fabric as wool the highest K/S was achieved by using 3% starch/chitosan blend.  These results refer that the highest K/S values have been achieved at different blends although the ratio of chitosan is constant, this may be due to the nature of the fabrics and the thickener viscosity.To evaluate the color parameter and the color difference of printed fabrics with highest K/S value, CIE Lab system is used. WhereL refers to lightness-darkness values from 100 to 0 representing white to black, values run from negative (green) to positive (red) and b values run from negative (blue) to positive (yellow), and the total color difference is given by ΔE.It can be seen from Table5 that the L values decrease in all the printed samples indicating that the sample becomes darker compared to that of the control sample. As seen from a and b values that the color hue changes to reddish yellow.Table 5
Color parameter and the color difference of printed Fabrics.
Printed sample
L
*
a
*
b
*
L
a
b
ΔL
Δa
Δb
ΔE
C
a
*
b
*
C
a
b
Wool
76.22
−1.85
47.68
63.53
9.72
55.63
−12.69
11.57
7.95
50.83
47.7
56.4
Polyamide
67.42
−4.44
16.29
64.53
−5.56
57.30
−2.96
1.12
41.01
41.13
16.8
17.7
Polyester
83.96
−7.36
15.39
74.03
−5.39
63.21
−9.93
1.97
47.82
48.88
17.0
63.4
Cotton/polyester
77.81
−2.16
41.39
67.50
11.48
49.02
−10.31
13.46
7.81
18.66
41.4
50.3
Cotton
85.15
−4.14
13.6
70.54
6.64
62.82
−14.61
10.78
49.22
51.71
14.2
63.1
Viscose/polyester
80.91
−4.93
22.02
72.63
2.38
58.51
−8.28
7.31
36.49
38.13
22.5
58.5The color difference (ΔE) values are also given in Table 5 and it can be clearly seen that there is a significant color difference between the samples and the control samples though the dye concentration is constant.The chroma is calculated as(a2+b2)1/2 as the chromaticity increases, a color becomes more intense; as it decreases a color becomes dull and this is clear from Table 5 that the chroma of sample (Cab) increased.


## 3.6. Determination of Fastness Properties and Surface Roughness

It is clear from the data of Table6 that with this new thickeners natural dye could print all kinds of fabrics under investigation with very good to excellent color fastness to rubbing, washing or perspiration. The notice of improvement is in the light fastness.Table 6
Fastness properties of control and highest K/S samples and surface roughness of fabrics.
Printing paste
Rubbing fastness
Washing fastness
Perspiration fastness
Light fastness
Roughness
Dry
Wet
Alt.
St.
Acid
Alkaline
Alt.
St.
Alt
St.
Cotton fabric (100%)
Commercial paste
4-5
4
4
4
4
4-5
4
4
1
13.01
5% starch/chitosan
4-5
3
4
4
4
4-5
4
4
3
13.11
Cotton/polyester blend fabric (35/65)
Commercial paste
4-5
4-5
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
16.78
6% starch/chitosan
4-5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3-4
12.17
Viscose/polyester (80/20)
Commercial paste
4-5
4-5
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
15.64
5% starch/chitosan
4-5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
15.65
Polyester
Commercial paste
4-5
4-5
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
18.62
6% Starch/chitosan
4-5
4-5
4
4
4
4
4
4
3-4
18.73
Polyamide
Commercial paste
4-5
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
24.67
4-5
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3-4
18.49
Wool
Commercial paste
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
25.01
6% Starch/chitosan
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
25.00The surface properties of the antistatic-treated fabrics are very important because these fabrics are used mainly for garments in direct contact with human skin, that surface roughness has strong effect on the wearer comfort. Surface roughness results of cotton, polyester, polyamide, and blend fabrics are given in Table6. The results showed the same or slight increase in the surface roughness of the using chitosan/starch blend compared with the standard.


## 3.7. Antimicrobial Activity of Treated Fabrics

Early research describing the antimicrobial potential of chitin, chitosan, and their derivatives dated from the 1980–1990s [25]. Generally, recent data in the literature has the tendency to characterize chitosan as bacteriostatic rather than bactericidal.Table7 shows that the printed fabrics using chitosan-starch blend exhibit antimicrobial characteristics compared with the control sample.Table 7
Antibacterial activity of different printed fabrics.
Sample
Inhibition zone diameter (mm/mg sample)
Bacillus subtilis (G+)
Esherichia coli (G−)
Staphylococcus aureus(G+)
pseudomonas aeruginosa gram
(G−)
Control
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Cotton
14
14
15
14
Cotton/polyester
15
15
15
16
Viscose/polyester
15
16
15
16
wool
16
16
15
16


## 4. Conclusion

Chitosan, which is a very useful nontoxic biopolymer, can be used as an effective antimicrobial finish and can also be used to increase the dye uptake of the fabrics. The new blends have definite rheological properties under varying shear stress during the entire printing process.The addition of chitosan to gelatinous starch has twofold effects: nature dye has successfully printed all fabric with increase in the color strength and related parameters of the printed fabrics, and the other is that it produces antimicrobial fabrics. The fastness properties of these fabrics are good against washing, light and perspiration. Thus, a nontoxic, ecofriendly, multifunctional finish has been developed for using natural dye in printing all fabrics.



---

*Source: 595810-2012-08-16.xml*