# Study of Band Gap of Silver Nanoparticles—Titanium Dioxide Nanocomposites

Authors: P. Barone; F. Stranges; M. Barberio; D. Renzelli; A. Bonanno; F. Xu
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

The optical and chemical properties of Ag/TiO2 nanocomposites were investigated to explore the possibilities of incorporating these new materials in Gratzel photoelectrochemical cells. The nanocomposites were obtained doping TiO2, in both allotropic species anatase and rutile, with silver nanoparticles (grown by laser ablation process). X-ray photoelectron data indicate the absence of Ag-Ti chemical bonds, while measurements of photoluminescence and optical absorbance in UV-visible range show a quench in photoluminescence emission of about 50% and an increase in visible absorbance of about 20%. Measurements of optical band gap, obtained by Tauc’s equation, indicate a variation of about 1.6 eV.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In recent decades, the scientific community has devoted much effort to the enhancement of the field of energy savings through the use of renewable energy.Although solid state junction devices with high efficiency dominate the commercial market, these photovoltaic technologies still receive constraints in market development due to both of expensive materials and complex manufacturing process. Consequently, the emerging photovoltaic technologies, such as organic and inorganic cells, quantum dots, and dye sensitized solar cells, have attracted extensive attention because of their promising inexpensive technique based on the solution-processed materials. However, these new devices seem to be associated with unsatisfactory efficiency (with value which ranges between 7% and 20% on laboratory prototypes) due of chemical and physical characteristics of employed materials.Recently, the interest has been focused on the application of nanostructured materials on dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). DSSCs mainly consist of a dye-sensitized TiO2 film deposited onto a transparent conducting substrate as the photoanode (working electrode), a redox active electrolyte, and a Pt cathode (counter electrode CE). The use of TiO2 (in both of its mineral phases, rutile and anatase) in DSSCs is suggested by its high chemical stability, excellent functionality, nontoxicity, optical proprieties (absorption of UV solar radiation), and relatively low cost [1–3].However, the low efficiency of DSSCs is linked to different factors as dye deterioration, electron/hole recombination in TiO2-dye substrate, and contact resistance between CE and electrolyte [1–3]. Moreover, the employ of titanium dioxide in solar cells is limited due of its transparency to visible light (only UV radiation is adsorbed and can be useful for photocatalytic activity) [4–8]. So, it is of great interest to extend the absorption wavelength of TiO2 to the visible region. This objective can be reached introducing various dopants into titanium dioxide lattice [9–12]. This generates additional electronic states in the dioxide energy band gap causing changes in optical bands and, so, in absorbance [12]. Several studies on TiO2doping with heteroatoms (C, N, and S) have shown that it can reduce the TiO2 optical band up to 0.8 eV [12]. Particularly, study on C-doping lead to growth of more reactive photocatalytic materials [5–7]. In a previous study, we used a simple mixing method to make CNTs/TiO2 microcomposites [13–18]. The luminescence emission of these composites is strongly modified compared to pure TiO2 with a sensible reduction in the visible region [13–16]. Moreover, in our recent work [15] we obtained carbon nanotube-TiO2 composite at 1.5% in weight that presented a decrease in the optical band of about 0.7 eV, a quench in photoluminescence of 50%, and an increase in the visible optical absorption of 60%.Here we present a study of an alternative doping process with silver nanoparticle. The aim of this work is to characterize the optical gap of Ag/TiO2 nanocomposites by the combined analysis of photoluminescence (PL) emission and UV absorbance. The data are further compared with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements and SEM and AFM images to obtain information about chemical structures and morphology of grown nanocomposites.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

Anatase powders were prepared with a simple sol-gel method (with temperature less than 900°C and using as precursor Ti(OBu)4) as reported in our previous work [19]. They are constituted by grains with dimension of about 400–600 nm (SEM images in Figure 1(a)). Rutile powders, purchased from “Inframat Advanced Materials, LLC”, appear as grains with dimensions of about 100–200 nm (SEM images in Figure 1(b)).SEM images of anatase (a) and rutile (b) grains.
(a)
(b)We grow silver nanoparticles by a laser ablation process obtaining spherical and spheroid particles with dimensions of hundreds of nm. Laser ablation process was taken on a silver plate (purity of 99.99%) vertically placed in a glass vessel filled with 25 mL of acetone. The plate was irradiated for 3 minutes by the output of the first harmonic (1064 nm) of a Quanta-Giant series 710 Nd:YAG laser operating at 20 Hz (laser power is fixed at 600 mJ/pulse). During the irradiation with the laser beam, the solution, initially transparent, gradually turns brownish-yellow indicating the formation of Ag nanoparticles in solution [20, 21]. After the LA, the solution was sonicated to prevent the self-aggregation of nanoparticles suspended in acetone and the formation of macrocluster.The Ag/TiO2 nanocomposites were prepared using a simple mixing method [13–17] with a sequence of mixing and heating processes. First, 100 mg of TiO2 powder was dispersed in 10 mL of aqueous solution of acetic acid (H3COOH—93.7%) and then mixed to obtain a paste. The suspension was then added to acetone solution of silver nanoparticles and heated on a hot plate at about 150°C to facilitate the acetone evaporation. Finally, the compound of Ag and TiO2 was deposited on a clean copper plate (2 cm × 2 cm in size) forming a thin film of about 500 μm and heated in a muffle furnace at 450°C to complete evaporation of acetic acid and correct arrangement of TiO2 molecules. During mixing process, we do not observe any changes in allotropic form of anatase and rutile caused by mixing or heating (the TiO2 molecular structure was monitored by FTIR measurements, not showed, before and after mixing process). We obtain two series (anatase or rutile) of TiO2 samples with different Ag nanoparticles amount simply varying the amounts of silver/acetone solution mixed with titanium dioxide suspensions (each series was prepared with 6, 12, 25, and 50 mL of Ag nanoparticles solutions—Ag6, Ag12, Ag25, and Ag50 samples, resp.). The obtained composites, showed in AFM and SEM images in Figure 2 (Ag50 samples as example for all), appeared as a uniform bulk of TiO2 grains with random insertion of Ag nanoparticles with dimensions of about 500 nm (see EDX details of Ag50 sample of nanoparticles in Figure 2(c)).Figure 2
AFM (a) and SEM (b) images of Ag/anatase composites obtained with the higher Ag percentage as example of all composites of both anatase and rutile series. EDX analysis (c) taken from anatase composites under SEM conditions.Surface roughness analysis, conducted from AFM images, does not show significative modification between pure TiO2 and nanocomposites. This clearly indicates that the doping with Ag nanoparticles does not damage the TiO2 film morphology.


### 2.2. Methods

Nanocomposites were characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, photoluminescence spectroscopy, and measurements of optical absorbance in the UV-visible range.XPS measurements were taken in a UHV chamber (base pressure in the range of low 10−9 torr) by a nonmonochromatic Mg-Kα X-ray (h
ν
=
1253.64 eV). The energies of XPS spectra were calibrated with the C 1s peak of a pure carbon sample (binding energy of 284.6 eV).Photoluminescence (PL) and optical absorbance measurements were taken with an Olympus microscope (HORIBA Jobin Yvon) mounting objectives of 10x, 50x, and 100x magnifications. The microscope is equipped with a laser source at 378 nm (12 mW of power) for PL, a white lamp for absorbance measurements (200–1500 nm), and a Triax 320 (HORIBA Jobin Yvon) spectrometer working in the 200–1500 nm range.We measured directly the reflected spectrum(
I
r
(
λ
)
) and obtained, simply assuming the transmittance to be null for bulk samples, the reflectance (
r
(
λ
)
) and the absorbance (
ε
(
λ
)
) as a function of wavelength by the following relation:
(1)
r
(
λ
)
=
I
r
(
λ
)
I
s
(
λ
)
,
ε
(
λ
)
=
1
-
r
(
λ
)
,
where I
s
(
λ
) is the intensity of the source spectrum.The Tauc’s equation was used to determine the band gapE
g from optical absorbance ε
(
λ
):
(2)
ω
2
ε
=
(
h
ω
-
E
g
)
2
,
where ω
=
2
π
/
λ. The plot of ε
1
/
2
/
λ versus 1
/
λ should be a straight line in the absorption range and E
g can be readily evaluated with a linear fit plot.The SEM and EDX measurements were performed using a Cambridge Stereoscan SEM, with a 20 keV electron beam and a current of few pA (having a spot size of ~1.4 mm2), while the AFM images are taken by an Icon Bruker AFM working in tapping mode. The images have a resolution of 512 × 512 lines and are acquired at scanning rate of 1 Hz. The obtained images were processed with the Nanoscope software (provided by Bruker) to evaluate surface roughness.


## 2.1. Materials

Anatase powders were prepared with a simple sol-gel method (with temperature less than 900°C and using as precursor Ti(OBu)4) as reported in our previous work [19]. They are constituted by grains with dimension of about 400–600 nm (SEM images in Figure 1(a)). Rutile powders, purchased from “Inframat Advanced Materials, LLC”, appear as grains with dimensions of about 100–200 nm (SEM images in Figure 1(b)).SEM images of anatase (a) and rutile (b) grains.
(a)
(b)We grow silver nanoparticles by a laser ablation process obtaining spherical and spheroid particles with dimensions of hundreds of nm. Laser ablation process was taken on a silver plate (purity of 99.99%) vertically placed in a glass vessel filled with 25 mL of acetone. The plate was irradiated for 3 minutes by the output of the first harmonic (1064 nm) of a Quanta-Giant series 710 Nd:YAG laser operating at 20 Hz (laser power is fixed at 600 mJ/pulse). During the irradiation with the laser beam, the solution, initially transparent, gradually turns brownish-yellow indicating the formation of Ag nanoparticles in solution [20, 21]. After the LA, the solution was sonicated to prevent the self-aggregation of nanoparticles suspended in acetone and the formation of macrocluster.The Ag/TiO2 nanocomposites were prepared using a simple mixing method [13–17] with a sequence of mixing and heating processes. First, 100 mg of TiO2 powder was dispersed in 10 mL of aqueous solution of acetic acid (H3COOH—93.7%) and then mixed to obtain a paste. The suspension was then added to acetone solution of silver nanoparticles and heated on a hot plate at about 150°C to facilitate the acetone evaporation. Finally, the compound of Ag and TiO2 was deposited on a clean copper plate (2 cm × 2 cm in size) forming a thin film of about 500 μm and heated in a muffle furnace at 450°C to complete evaporation of acetic acid and correct arrangement of TiO2 molecules. During mixing process, we do not observe any changes in allotropic form of anatase and rutile caused by mixing or heating (the TiO2 molecular structure was monitored by FTIR measurements, not showed, before and after mixing process). We obtain two series (anatase or rutile) of TiO2 samples with different Ag nanoparticles amount simply varying the amounts of silver/acetone solution mixed with titanium dioxide suspensions (each series was prepared with 6, 12, 25, and 50 mL of Ag nanoparticles solutions—Ag6, Ag12, Ag25, and Ag50 samples, resp.). The obtained composites, showed in AFM and SEM images in Figure 2 (Ag50 samples as example for all), appeared as a uniform bulk of TiO2 grains with random insertion of Ag nanoparticles with dimensions of about 500 nm (see EDX details of Ag50 sample of nanoparticles in Figure 2(c)).Figure 2
AFM (a) and SEM (b) images of Ag/anatase composites obtained with the higher Ag percentage as example of all composites of both anatase and rutile series. EDX analysis (c) taken from anatase composites under SEM conditions.Surface roughness analysis, conducted from AFM images, does not show significative modification between pure TiO2 and nanocomposites. This clearly indicates that the doping with Ag nanoparticles does not damage the TiO2 film morphology.


## 2.2. Methods

Nanocomposites were characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, photoluminescence spectroscopy, and measurements of optical absorbance in the UV-visible range.XPS measurements were taken in a UHV chamber (base pressure in the range of low 10−9 torr) by a nonmonochromatic Mg-Kα X-ray (h
ν
=
1253.64 eV). The energies of XPS spectra were calibrated with the C 1s peak of a pure carbon sample (binding energy of 284.6 eV).Photoluminescence (PL) and optical absorbance measurements were taken with an Olympus microscope (HORIBA Jobin Yvon) mounting objectives of 10x, 50x, and 100x magnifications. The microscope is equipped with a laser source at 378 nm (12 mW of power) for PL, a white lamp for absorbance measurements (200–1500 nm), and a Triax 320 (HORIBA Jobin Yvon) spectrometer working in the 200–1500 nm range.We measured directly the reflected spectrum(
I
r
(
λ
)
) and obtained, simply assuming the transmittance to be null for bulk samples, the reflectance (
r
(
λ
)
) and the absorbance (
ε
(
λ
)
) as a function of wavelength by the following relation:
(1)
r
(
λ
)
=
I
r
(
λ
)
I
s
(
λ
)
,
ε
(
λ
)
=
1
-
r
(
λ
)
,
where I
s
(
λ
) is the intensity of the source spectrum.The Tauc’s equation was used to determine the band gapE
g from optical absorbance ε
(
λ
):
(2)
ω
2
ε
=
(
h
ω
-
E
g
)
2
,
where ω
=
2
π
/
λ. The plot of ε
1
/
2
/
λ versus 1
/
λ should be a straight line in the absorption range and E
g can be readily evaluated with a linear fit plot.The SEM and EDX measurements were performed using a Cambridge Stereoscan SEM, with a 20 keV electron beam and a current of few pA (having a spot size of ~1.4 mm2), while the AFM images are taken by an Icon Bruker AFM working in tapping mode. The images have a resolution of 512 × 512 lines and are acquired at scanning rate of 1 Hz. The obtained images were processed with the Nanoscope software (provided by Bruker) to evaluate surface roughness.


## 3. Results and Discussion

The chemical composition of our mixture and information on the bonding nature are obtained with XPS analysis and are summarized in Table1. XPS spectra (in Figure 3, as example for all samples, the survey spectrum of An50) indicate in all composites only the presence of titanium, oxygen, and silver with surface concentration of each element as indicated in Table 1. In anatase series, the silver concentration on sample surface varies from 0.3% to 1% while in rutile heterostructures the silver concentration is lower varying from 0.05% to 0.2%, denoting a different distribution of silver. This behavior can be explained both in terms of molecular structure and in terms of geometric dimension of nanoparticle grains (the silver amount in each corresponding sample is the same). In fact, the different molecular structure of rutile and anatase can affect the interaction between TiO2 molecules and Ag nanoparticle. Furthermore, the different size of rutile and anatase grains can modify the nanoparticles diffusion in the bulk (anatase grains, larger about 4 times than those of the rutile, can prevent the diffusion of the silver nanoparticles in the bulk of the composites). Moreover, for both anatase and rutile series the Ti-O ratio is not this of 1 : 2 expected from TiO2 stoichiometry indicating the presence in all samples of about 10% of oxygen impurities adsorbed in growth process (likely the adsorption occurred during the heating process in air at 450°C).Table 1
Element's amount and XPS line position evaluated from XPS data.
Sample
Element’s amount (%)
XPS line position (eV)
Ti
O
Ag
Ti 2p 3/2
O 1S
Ag 3d 5/2
Anatase
29.80
70.19
459.16
530.29
Ag6/An
30.73
68.90
0.30
459.57
529.24
368.30
Ag12/An
28.41
70.92
0.66
458.09
529.16
368.03
Ag25/An
28.15
70.75
1.09
457.82
529.75
369.30
Ag50/An
28.83
75.05
1.11
457.40
530.13
367.72
Rutile
22.70
77.30
459.90
529.91
Ag6/Ru
22.87
77.07
0.05
458.60
530.60
368.62
Ag12/Ru
24.18
75.74
0.07
458.20
530.40
368.11
Ag25/Ru
23.18
76.65
0.17
459.01
531.20
369.32
Ag50/Ru
21.58
78.22
0.2
459.10
529.20
369.20Figure 3
XPS survey spectra for Ag50 anatase sample as example for all.Ti 2p 3/2 and O 1s XPS lines are centered in all samples at about 458 and 530 eV, characteristic of TiO2 molecules [21], while Ag 3d 5/2 lines are all centered at about 368 eV denoting the presence on sample surfaces of both Ag-Ag and Ag-O chemical bonds [21]. Silver nanoparticles are highly sensitive to oxygen presence due to their elevated surface/volume ratio [22, 23]. XPS data do not show any sign of chemical bonds between Ti-Ag, indicating the physisorption characteristic of doping process.The photoluminescence emission of pure anatase and rutile samples, Figure4, has two main structures centered at about 548 and 590 nm (inset of Figure 4) which are attributed to surface oxygen vacancies and associated to shallow energy levels below the conduction band [14]. The photoluminescence intensity decreases greatly with Ag nanoparticles doping and is quenched of about 50% for samples with higher percentage of Ag (in both anatase and rutile series). The absence of blue or red shift in PL bands confirms the absence of Ti-Ag chemical bonds formation already observed from XPS data.Photoluminescence spectra of nanocomposites (obtained at the higher Ag percentage) compared with those of pure TiO2 for both rutile (a) and anatase (b) series.
(a)
(b)The optical absorbance (Figure5) decreases in all UV region of about 20% for rutile and of about 5% for anatase-based nanocomposite. Fortunately, this decrease in UV absorbance is compensated from an increase in visible absorbance of about 20% for all composites. Moreover the optical band gap, calculated with Tauc’s equation, shows a decrease from about 3 eV, typical of TiO2(2.9 for anatase and 3.1 for rutile), to about 1.4 eV of nanocomposites at higher concentration of silver. These drastic decreases in optical band can explain both the quenching of photoluminescence and the changes in UV-visible absorption and clearly indicate a progressive metallization of samples caused by the Ag doping.Figure 5
Visible absorbance spectra of nanocomposites (obtained at the higher Ag percentage) compared with those of pure TiO2 for both anatase and rutile series. Inset: UV absorbance.In our previous works [15], we demonstrate the effectiveness of CNT doping of titanium dioxide respect to C-atom doping reaching a decrease of 0.7 eV (decrease of about 25%) in optical band gap with a doping of 1.5% of CNT. Here we obtain a further improvement with a silver nanoparticle doping with a decrease of about 50% in optical bands.


## 4. Conclusions

We have presented the results of effect of Ag nanoparticles doping on TiO2, for both anatase and rutile species. In both cases we observe that the doping process leads to a variation of 1.6 eV in optical gap already at very low silver percentage (Ag6 samples), quenches the photoluminescence emission of about 50%, and increases the optical absorbance in visible range of about the 20%. All these results denote a progressive metallization of titanium dioxide and indicate the Ag/TiO2 nanocomposites as good candidates to substitute pure TiO2 in Gratzel cells. In fact, the decrease of 1.6 eV in optical band gap suggests a significative reduction of electron-hole recombination in dioxide (improving, so, the DSSCs efficiency). Many efforts are necessary to study the electrical properties of obtained nanocomposites before their introduction in photoelectrochemical cells.



---

*Source: 589707-2014-04-09.xml*