# A Planar Reconfigurable Radiation Pattern Dipole Antenna with Reflectors and Directors for Wireless Communication Applications

Authors: Imen Ben Trad; Jean Marie Floc’h; Hatem Rmili; M’hamed Drissi; Fethi Choubani
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

A planar printed dipole antenna with reflectors and directors, able to steer its radiation pattern in different directions, is proposed for telecommunication applications. Starting from a dual-beam printed dipole antenna achieved by combining two elementary dipoles back to back, and by loading four PIN diodes, three modes of reconfigurable radiation patterns are achieved at the frequency 2.56 GHz thanks to switches states. A prototype of the structure was realized and characterized; an efficiency of 75% is obtained. Simulation and measured results of the results are presented and discussed.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In the latest years, reconfigurable radiation pattern antennas are becoming more and more desired because of the increasing demands on the quality and capacity of the telecommunication systems. The capability to steer the beam’s directions electronically extends the functionalities of the antennas and adds more flexibility. In addition, the radiation pattern agility characteristic contributes on avoiding noisy environments, improving security, and saving energy by better directing signal toward intended users which enhance the overall performances of the modern wireless communication systems.Several reconfigurable radiation pattern antennas have been reported such as a three-layer switchable radiation pattern antenna based on the conventional Yagi antenna [1], an hexagonal cylinder antenna with moderate gain of 5 dBi [2], and a central circular patch with two paddle-shaped parasitic patches [3].Among many types of reconfigurable antennas, planar structures [4–8] in particular have been extensively investigated because of their attractive features such as simple structure, low profile, light weight, and ease of fabrication and integration.In [4], a printed planar ring-dipole microstrip fed antenna was designed to switch its radiation pattern in different directions depending on the state of six loaded PIN diode switches. A planar slotted bow-tie antenna with reconfigurable pattern properties was reported in [5]; the antenna consists of a pair of reconfigurable CPW-to-slot line transitions, a pair of Vivaldi-shaped radiating tapered slots, and four PIN diodes. The compact wideband antenna with alternate reflector and radiator presented in [6] achieves two directional radiation patterns by using short and open circuits (The maximum gain obtained is about 4.5 dBi for the RRC and about −5 dBi for the LRC).In this paper, a planar printed dipole antenna with reconfigurable radiation performances operating at 2.56 GHz was designed. Depending on the states of four loaded PIN diodes, the antenna can select between three modes. In the first mode M1, a dual-beam can be achieved in bothx- and −x-directions by turning ON all the RF switches, and a measured peak gain of 7.3 dBi is well reached. In the second mode M2, when only one dipole and its director are enabled, a unique directive beam can be radiated in x- or −x-directions with a half-power beamwidth (HPBW) of 48° and a measured peak gain of 8.12 dBi. Finally by deactivating the director in the second mode M2, we may obtain the third mode M3. Therefore, when only the elementary dipole is activated, a less directive pattern would be reached with larger HPBW (94°) and a lower measured peak gain (5.37 dBi). The designed structure presents a measured peak efficiency of 75% at the operating frequency.


## 2. Antenna Design

The planar dual-beam dipole antenna was performed to operate at 2.45 GHz by printing two elementary dipoles (denoted dipole 1 and dipole 2) back to back on an Arlon CuClad217 substrate of thicknessh
=
0.8 mm and relative permittivity ε
r
=
2.17. As it is shown in Figure 1, two identical dipole arms of dimension ((
L
1
/
2
)
×
L
dip) were printed on the top layer of the substrate, whereas, on the bottom side, two identical reflectors (L
ref
×
W
ref), two identical directors (L
dir
×
W
dir), a ground plane (L
g
×
W
g), and the two other dipole arms (L
2
×
L
dip) were printed. A prototype was manufactured and characterized, and measurements were compared to simulation results [9]. Then, in order to electronically control the radiation pattern of the dual beam antenna, four PIN diodes were loaded on the bottom side. Two diodes were integrated between each reflector and the dipole arm, while the two others were implanted in the middle of the two directors as depicted in Figure 1.(a) Schema of the reconfigurable dipole antenna: (b) top view; (c) back view.
(a)
(b)
(c)The design parameters are summarized in Table1. Depending on the PIN diode states, three main modes of radiation were obtained for the reconfigurable structure. These modes are detailed in Table 2. Mode M1 is defined when all the switches are activated in order to compare the active structure with the passive one (without switches). Mode M2 represents the operation of one compartment (dipole + reflector + director) in the structure when the other is deactivated. Mode M3 excludes the effect of the director in one compartment described in mode M2. We have omitted to consider mode 4 where both of the dipoles are deactivated because it is with no interest since the structure is not excited at all.Table 1
Design parameters.
Dimension (mm)
Parameter
Value
L
209
W
62
L
dip
27.5
L
1
116
L
dir
45
W
dir
2
L
ref
60
W
ref
6
e
2
W
g
14
L
2
27
L
g
50Table 2
Mode configurations by switches on/off conditions.
Mode
Configuration
State
Switch 1
Switch 2
Switch 3
Switch 4
Mode 1
All dipoles and directors are activated.
S1
On
On
On
On
Mode 2
Only dipole 1 and director 1 are activated.
S21
On
On
Off
Off
Only dipole 2 and director 2 are activated.
S22
Off
Off
On
On
Mode 3
Only dipole 1 is activated.
S31
Off
On
Off
Off
Only dipole 2 is activated.
S32
Off
Off
On
OffThe implementation procedure of the PIN diodes is complex. That is why we decided to load only two PIN diodes between each reflector and the dipole arm as shown in Figure2 to prove the concept. Then, short and open circuits will be used for the two directors for the rest of measurements. The used Skyworks-SMP 1320-079LF diodes were chosen for their low series resistance.Photo of the prototyped antennas: The passive structure (a) top view; (b) back view; (c) with the integrated PIN diodes and the related bias circuit.
(a)
(b)
(c)To control the status of the diodes, a bias circuit composed of three pads (two were connected to the positive terminal of the power supply), three chokes, and a resistanceR
=
1
k
Ω connected to the power supply ground was used, but it does not affect the behavior of the antenna. To isolate the dc while maintaining continuity for the RF, two capacitors (C
=
10
nF) were integrated to the bias network as shown in Figure 3. The supplied control voltage was about V
+
=
1.5
V.Figure 3
Bias circuit of the PIN diodes.In simulation, the diodes were modeled as short and open circuits; losses were not taken into consideration.


## 3. Results and Discussion

The reconfigurable radiation pattern antenna was simulated using the 3D electromagnetic simulator Ansoft-HFSS 13, realized and experimentally characterized at the operating frequency 2.56 GHz.The realized prototype was investigated by measuring its impedance matching over the frequency band 2-3 GHz and its radiation properties (gain, efficiency, and radiation patterns) by using an anechoic room (Satimo Stargate from the IETR Institute). Good agreement between measured and simulated results is obtained. The implantation of switches as described above allows the electronic control of the radiated beam at the operating frequency by activating or deactivating one elementary dipole and/or directors.In order to better understand the radiation mechanism of the structure, we have analyzed simulated surface current distributions inside the antenna and the 2D/3D radiation patterns for all the considered modes.In this paragraph, we present simulated and measured results as impedance matching, surface current distribution, radiation patterns, gain, and efficiency dealing with all modes. For mode M1, we show main results, whereas for modes M2 and M3, and due to the symmetry of the structure, we chose to present, in addition to simulations, only measured results dealing with mode M2/state S21 and mode M3/state S3, where the antenna radiates in thex-direction.


### 3.1. Mode M1: Dual-Beam Pattern

When PIN diodes are loaded and are turned ON, the dipole is still able to operate at the operating frequency 2.45 GHz as it can be noticed from Figure4 which exhibits simulated and measured return losses of the starting dipole with and without switches. We can conclude that the effect of the bias circuit on the antenna operation is week.Figure 4
Simulated and measured return loss of the antenna (mode M1) at the resonant frequency 2.45 GHz without diodes, and when all diodes are ON.As it is well known, by placing a reflector (whose length should be larger than the dipole length:L
ref
≈
1.1
×
2
L
dip) near the dipole antenna, an eccentric pattern will be reached with a maximum radiation towards the dipole. The addition of a director (whose length should be lower than the dipole length: L
dir
≈
0.8
×
2
L
dip) allows for the improvement of the gain by better directing the radiated beams. According to Figure 5(a), when all RF switches are disconnected (passive antenna) or at ON state, the two elementary dipoles radiate. Moreover, as it can be seen in Figures 5(b) and 5(c), simulated and measured radiation patterns show a dual-beam behavior, where the maximum gain (around 7 dBi) was obtained in the x-direction (axis of the dipoles), as it was expected.The dual-beam dipole antenna (in mode M1) at the resonant frequency 2.45 GHz: (a) Simulated current distribution; (b) 3D-Simulated radiation pattern; (c) 3D-measured radiation pattern.
(a)
(b)
(c)


### 3.2. Mode M2: High Directive Reconfigurable Beam

When mode M2 is excited, the resonance frequency of the dipole shifts slightly to higher frequencies. As it is shown in Figure6, the simulated operating frequency is 2.63 GHz, whereas the measured one is centered around 2.56 GHz. This frequency shift may be explained by the possible effect of the bias circuit.Figure 6
Simulated and measured return loss of the antenna when operating in Mode M2.For state S21 of mode M2, the surface current distribution presented in Figure7(a) shows that dipole 2 and director 2 are disabled, and only dipole 1 and director 1 radiate in the x-direction. Measured 2D-radiation patterns confirm this behavior predicted by simulations as shown in Figures 8 and 9.Figure 7
Simulated current distributions at the operating frequency 2.63 GHz for mode M2: (a) S21-State; (b) S22-State.3D-simulated radiation patterns at 2,63 GHz for mode M2: (a) S21-State; (b) S22-State.
(a)
(b)2D-simulated radiation patterns for mode M2 (S21- and S22-states) at 2.63 GHz: (a) 2D-simulated (at 2.63 GHz) and measured (at 2,56 GHz) radiation patterns for S21-State of Mode M2.
(a)
(b)The radiation in −x-direction is simply obtained by activating dipole 2 and deactivating dipole 1; the structure operates then in S22-state of mode M2.As it can be noticed from Figures8 and 9, we can remark the presence of a rear radiation for S21- and S22-states.Because of the symmetrical structure, the reconfigurable dipole antenna presents the same performances in bothx- and −x-directions. In both cases, the measured HPBW is around 48°. The observed asymmetrical measured 2D-pattern may be attributed to diodes and their associated bias circuits.Figure10 exhibits the measured gain evolution over the frequency band 2,4–2,7 GHz (centered on the resonant frequency 2,56 GHz) for the reconfigurable antenna when operating state S21 of mode M2. The reconfigurable radiation pattern antenna presents a simulated peak gain of 7.42 dBi at the resonant frequency 2.63 GHz, whereas the measured maximum gain is 8.12 dBi at the operating frequency 2.56 GHz. It is worth to know that the measured maximum gain for the passive structure is 7.3 dBi.Figure 10
Measured gain of the reconfigurable antenna when operating in S21-state of mode M2.


### 3.3. Mode M3: Less Directive Reconfigurable Beam

As for mode M2, when mode M3 is excited, the operating frequency of the reconfigurable dipole moves slowly to higher frequencies. Figure11 shows a measured resonance frequency of 2.56 GHz.Figure 11
Simulated and measured return loss of the dipole when operating in Mode M3.When S31 state is active (we keep switch S2 ON and we turn OFF switches S1, S3, and S4), dipole 2 will be obviously deactivated as explained above (S21 state of mode M2) and the two strips of the director 1 will be disconnected; thus, the surface current distribution will be altered and director 1 becomes invisible for dipole 1 as depicted in Figure12(a). Then, the antenna radiates in the x-direction.Figure 12
Simulated current distributions at the operating frequency 2.64 GHz for mode M3: (a) S31-State; (b) S32-State.Otherwise, if we excite S32 state as shown in Figure12(b), the antenna will radiate fairly as described for S22 state of the mode M2 (presented in Figure 7(b)); the radiation pattern will be then oriented in the −x-direction; however, director 2 (not considered as a single strip when S4 is turned Off) becomes unseen for dipole 2 which explains the decrease of the measured gain of nearly 2.75 dBi compared to both of the S21 and S22-states of mode M2 presented earlier as depicted in Figures 13 and 14.3D-simulated radiation patterns at 2,64 GHz for mode M3: (a) S31-State; (b) S32-State.
(a)
(b)(a) 2D-simulated radiation patterns for mode M3 (S31- and S32-states) at 2,64 GHz: (a) 2D-simulated (at 2.64 GHz) and measured (at 2.56 GHz) radiation patterns for S31-State of Mode M3.
(a)
(b)By comparison with mode M2, we notice that for both S31 and S32 states, the rear radiation of the antenna is significantly reduced, the radiation patterns become then less directive with larger HPBW (the measured value is 94°). Besides, the measured 2D-radiation pattern matches well with simulations.It is trivial to note that, for modes M2 and M3, when the elementary dipole is disabled, turning ON or OFF switches (S1 or S4) loaded on the corresponding director is with no interest (the director will be consequently disabled).As mentioned before, because of the symmetry of the antenna, the dipole behaves in the same manner in bothx-direction and −x-direction. That is why, it is sufficient to study the state S31 of the mode M3 (when the antenna radiates in x-direction). The deactivation of director 1 in addition to the dipole 2 leads to a less directive beam in the x-direction with a simulated gain of 5.9 dBi. The measured gain is around 5.37 dBi as it can be deduced from Figure 15.Figure 15
Measured gain of the reconfigurable antenna when operating in S31-state of mode M3.


### 3.4. Summary

One can see that, as summarized in Table3, according to the PIN diodes states, the antenna can switch its radiation pattern in both x- and −x-directions. At the same time, it can move from a directive radiation pattern to a less directive one (since the corresponding director, which naturally improves the gain by better directing the radiation, was disabled).Table 3
Summarized measured peak gain and maximum beam direction.
State
Beam’s direction
Half-power beamwidth (°)
Max gain (dBi)
Mode M1
S1
-
x and +
x
—
7.3
Mode M2
S21
+
x
48
8.12
S22
-
x
48
8.12
Mode M3
S31
+
x
94
5.37
S32
-
x
94
5.37As it can be seen in Figure16, the active antenna is slightly less efficient than the passive one but still able to achieve a measured efficiency of 75% at the operating frequency.Figure 16
Measured efficiency of both passive, and reconfigurable (S31-state of mode M3) antennas.The integration of RF switches and their related bias circuits improves the antenna performances, while keeping the antenna as efficient as the passive structure.


## 3.1. Mode M1: Dual-Beam Pattern

When PIN diodes are loaded and are turned ON, the dipole is still able to operate at the operating frequency 2.45 GHz as it can be noticed from Figure4 which exhibits simulated and measured return losses of the starting dipole with and without switches. We can conclude that the effect of the bias circuit on the antenna operation is week.Figure 4
Simulated and measured return loss of the antenna (mode M1) at the resonant frequency 2.45 GHz without diodes, and when all diodes are ON.As it is well known, by placing a reflector (whose length should be larger than the dipole length:L
ref
≈
1.1
×
2
L
dip) near the dipole antenna, an eccentric pattern will be reached with a maximum radiation towards the dipole. The addition of a director (whose length should be lower than the dipole length: L
dir
≈
0.8
×
2
L
dip) allows for the improvement of the gain by better directing the radiated beams. According to Figure 5(a), when all RF switches are disconnected (passive antenna) or at ON state, the two elementary dipoles radiate. Moreover, as it can be seen in Figures 5(b) and 5(c), simulated and measured radiation patterns show a dual-beam behavior, where the maximum gain (around 7 dBi) was obtained in the x-direction (axis of the dipoles), as it was expected.The dual-beam dipole antenna (in mode M1) at the resonant frequency 2.45 GHz: (a) Simulated current distribution; (b) 3D-Simulated radiation pattern; (c) 3D-measured radiation pattern.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.2. Mode M2: High Directive Reconfigurable Beam

When mode M2 is excited, the resonance frequency of the dipole shifts slightly to higher frequencies. As it is shown in Figure6, the simulated operating frequency is 2.63 GHz, whereas the measured one is centered around 2.56 GHz. This frequency shift may be explained by the possible effect of the bias circuit.Figure 6
Simulated and measured return loss of the antenna when operating in Mode M2.For state S21 of mode M2, the surface current distribution presented in Figure7(a) shows that dipole 2 and director 2 are disabled, and only dipole 1 and director 1 radiate in the x-direction. Measured 2D-radiation patterns confirm this behavior predicted by simulations as shown in Figures 8 and 9.Figure 7
Simulated current distributions at the operating frequency 2.63 GHz for mode M2: (a) S21-State; (b) S22-State.3D-simulated radiation patterns at 2,63 GHz for mode M2: (a) S21-State; (b) S22-State.
(a)
(b)2D-simulated radiation patterns for mode M2 (S21- and S22-states) at 2.63 GHz: (a) 2D-simulated (at 2.63 GHz) and measured (at 2,56 GHz) radiation patterns for S21-State of Mode M2.
(a)
(b)The radiation in −x-direction is simply obtained by activating dipole 2 and deactivating dipole 1; the structure operates then in S22-state of mode M2.As it can be noticed from Figures8 and 9, we can remark the presence of a rear radiation for S21- and S22-states.Because of the symmetrical structure, the reconfigurable dipole antenna presents the same performances in bothx- and −x-directions. In both cases, the measured HPBW is around 48°. The observed asymmetrical measured 2D-pattern may be attributed to diodes and their associated bias circuits.Figure10 exhibits the measured gain evolution over the frequency band 2,4–2,7 GHz (centered on the resonant frequency 2,56 GHz) for the reconfigurable antenna when operating state S21 of mode M2. The reconfigurable radiation pattern antenna presents a simulated peak gain of 7.42 dBi at the resonant frequency 2.63 GHz, whereas the measured maximum gain is 8.12 dBi at the operating frequency 2.56 GHz. It is worth to know that the measured maximum gain for the passive structure is 7.3 dBi.Figure 10
Measured gain of the reconfigurable antenna when operating in S21-state of mode M2.


## 3.3. Mode M3: Less Directive Reconfigurable Beam

As for mode M2, when mode M3 is excited, the operating frequency of the reconfigurable dipole moves slowly to higher frequencies. Figure11 shows a measured resonance frequency of 2.56 GHz.Figure 11
Simulated and measured return loss of the dipole when operating in Mode M3.When S31 state is active (we keep switch S2 ON and we turn OFF switches S1, S3, and S4), dipole 2 will be obviously deactivated as explained above (S21 state of mode M2) and the two strips of the director 1 will be disconnected; thus, the surface current distribution will be altered and director 1 becomes invisible for dipole 1 as depicted in Figure12(a). Then, the antenna radiates in the x-direction.Figure 12
Simulated current distributions at the operating frequency 2.64 GHz for mode M3: (a) S31-State; (b) S32-State.Otherwise, if we excite S32 state as shown in Figure12(b), the antenna will radiate fairly as described for S22 state of the mode M2 (presented in Figure 7(b)); the radiation pattern will be then oriented in the −x-direction; however, director 2 (not considered as a single strip when S4 is turned Off) becomes unseen for dipole 2 which explains the decrease of the measured gain of nearly 2.75 dBi compared to both of the S21 and S22-states of mode M2 presented earlier as depicted in Figures 13 and 14.3D-simulated radiation patterns at 2,64 GHz for mode M3: (a) S31-State; (b) S32-State.
(a)
(b)(a) 2D-simulated radiation patterns for mode M3 (S31- and S32-states) at 2,64 GHz: (a) 2D-simulated (at 2.64 GHz) and measured (at 2.56 GHz) radiation patterns for S31-State of Mode M3.
(a)
(b)By comparison with mode M2, we notice that for both S31 and S32 states, the rear radiation of the antenna is significantly reduced, the radiation patterns become then less directive with larger HPBW (the measured value is 94°). Besides, the measured 2D-radiation pattern matches well with simulations.It is trivial to note that, for modes M2 and M3, when the elementary dipole is disabled, turning ON or OFF switches (S1 or S4) loaded on the corresponding director is with no interest (the director will be consequently disabled).As mentioned before, because of the symmetry of the antenna, the dipole behaves in the same manner in bothx-direction and −x-direction. That is why, it is sufficient to study the state S31 of the mode M3 (when the antenna radiates in x-direction). The deactivation of director 1 in addition to the dipole 2 leads to a less directive beam in the x-direction with a simulated gain of 5.9 dBi. The measured gain is around 5.37 dBi as it can be deduced from Figure 15.Figure 15
Measured gain of the reconfigurable antenna when operating in S31-state of mode M3.


## 3.4. Summary

One can see that, as summarized in Table3, according to the PIN diodes states, the antenna can switch its radiation pattern in both x- and −x-directions. At the same time, it can move from a directive radiation pattern to a less directive one (since the corresponding director, which naturally improves the gain by better directing the radiation, was disabled).Table 3
Summarized measured peak gain and maximum beam direction.
State
Beam’s direction
Half-power beamwidth (°)
Max gain (dBi)
Mode M1
S1
-
x and +
x
—
7.3
Mode M2
S21
+
x
48
8.12
S22
-
x
48
8.12
Mode M3
S31
+
x
94
5.37
S32
-
x
94
5.37As it can be seen in Figure16, the active antenna is slightly less efficient than the passive one but still able to achieve a measured efficiency of 75% at the operating frequency.Figure 16
Measured efficiency of both passive, and reconfigurable (S31-state of mode M3) antennas.The integration of RF switches and their related bias circuits improves the antenna performances, while keeping the antenna as efficient as the passive structure.


## 4. Conclusion

A planar printed dipole antenna, designed by combining two elementary dipoles, with reconfigurable radiation pattern properties has been proposed for wireless communication systems. The agility was ensured by using four PIN diodes. The antenna which operates around 2,56 GHz is able to tilt its radiation pattern in both −x- and x-directions depending on the switch states. We can obtain in one mode a directive pattern with 8.12 dBi of gain and a less directive pattern with 5.37 dBi in another mode. If all switches are turned ON, the antenna founds its dual beam radiation at 2.45 GHz. One can also tune the operating frequency of the antenna by adjusting the distance between dipoles and reflectors, the distance between the two reflectors, and the size of the reflectors.



---

*Source: 593259-2014-01-05.xml*