# The Channel Estimation and Modeling in High Altitude Platform Station Wireless Communication Dynamic Network

Authors: Xiaoyang Liu; Xiaoping Zeng; Chao Liu; Wanping Liu; Yihao Zhang
Journal: Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

In order to analyze the channel estimation performance of near space high altitude platform station (HAPS) in wireless communication system, the structure and formation of HAPS are studied in this paper. The traditional Least Squares (LS) channel estimation method and Singular Value Decomposition-Linear Minimum Mean-Squared (SVD-LMMS) channel estimation method are compared and investigated. A novel channel estimation method and model are proposed. The channel estimation performance of HAPS is studied deeply. The simulation and theoretical analysis results show that the performance of the proposed method is better than the traditional methods. The lower Bit Error Rate (BER) and higher Signal Noise Ratio (SNR) can be obtained by the proposed method compared with the LS and SVD-LMMS methods.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

### 1.1. Background and Research Status

High altitude platform station (HAPS) is a stranded in 20 km~50 km height of near space, a particular location which is a stationary platform relative to the ground. It can be seen as between terrestrial communication system and satellite communication system between communications system [1, 2]. It is aimed at the height of the development of land and space between spaces of potential interest. It can improve the communication capacity and spectrum in efficiency and also can reduce the equipment cost and complexity. The path decline of HAPS is smaller than terrestrial communication system, and they have smaller delay than the satellite communication system. In order to be more competitive, more and more people begin to pay attention to HAPS. In the near space platform, construction of monitoring and communication system received further attention. The development of HAPS is similar to satellite communication in the 1960s [3–5]. HAPS can be described as “a new wireless communication technology that has a broad application prospect and can overturn the development of telecom industry new technology.” It is the foundation of the next generation of wireless communication. It has to make full use of radio spectrum resources, large capacity of the system user, communication of good quality, low operational risk, and so on. You can upgrade communication load operation at any time.References [6, 7] present a suitable high-speed mobile near space HAPS channel estimation pilot sequence based on the traditional optimal wireless communication system pilot sequence. Each received-transmit antenna of HAPS wireless communication space system can be considered as independent HAPS system after insertion of the pilot sequence [8, 9]. ICI (Intersymbol Interference) coefficient and DFT (Discrete Fourier Transform) channel estimation algorithm are researched in [10, 11]; as long as this relationship is defined, we can get the outputs only by nonlinear computation. Furthermore, the feedback signal is calculated. It can use CAZAC (Constant Amplitude Zero Autocorrelation) sequence [12–15] as training sequence for channel estimation with fast moving system environment. This sequence will ensure the independence of each transmit antenna pilot frequency which can eliminate the interference of the pilot frequency when doing the channel estimation [10, 16, 17]. Transmitting antenna can send pilot frequency alternately which will avoid aliasing, namely, when transmitting pilot frequency information by one antenna while other antennas remain idle. Thus, channel response can be easily estimated between receiving-sending antennas. But in high-speed time-varying mobile environment, due to data subcarrier to pilot frequency subcarrier interference [11, 18], it is difficult to estimate each response to transmit-receive channel, thus seriously affecting the overall performance of the system. So it is said that the structure is only suitable for the slowly varying channel, and for high-speed mobile channel, this method cannot track channel changes [19–21].


### 1.2. Motivations

The above discussion implies that novel inequality methods allow us to obtain more precise SNR and lower BER. Most references do not consider the dynamic behaviors of wireless communication networks under near space. Wireless communication channel estimation modeling method inequality is presented in [22–25]. Under this method efficiency, novel channel estimation method and mathematics model could be proposed.


### 1.3. Our Work and Contributions

In this paper, the wireless communication channel estimation and modeling problem of near space by dynamic method is further investigated. By giving more precise estimation for the SNR and the lower BER, a new channel estimation method is obtained. Under this method, some novel results are presented. Based on the discrete dynamics topology structure, the fast dynamic channel mathematics model is derived. Simulation is employed to indicate the effectiveness of the proposed method and model.The main contributions of this paper are listed as follows. (1) A new wireless communication framework is introduced to improve the channel performance. (2) A novel channel estimation method and a new channel model are proposed. (3) A new discrete dynamics topology structure in network is built up. (4) The lower BER and higher SNR are obtained by the theoretical simulation results. These results are practical and objective.


### 1.4. Structure of the Paper

The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section2, HAPS wireless communication network is introduced. In Section 3, LS (Least Squares) channel estimation principle and SVD-LMMS’s channel estimation principle are studied. In Section 4, a new channel estimation and modeling method is proposed. In Section 5, the simulation analytical results are presented. Finally, conclusions are drawn in Section 6.


## 1.1. Background and Research Status

High altitude platform station (HAPS) is a stranded in 20 km~50 km height of near space, a particular location which is a stationary platform relative to the ground. It can be seen as between terrestrial communication system and satellite communication system between communications system [1, 2]. It is aimed at the height of the development of land and space between spaces of potential interest. It can improve the communication capacity and spectrum in efficiency and also can reduce the equipment cost and complexity. The path decline of HAPS is smaller than terrestrial communication system, and they have smaller delay than the satellite communication system. In order to be more competitive, more and more people begin to pay attention to HAPS. In the near space platform, construction of monitoring and communication system received further attention. The development of HAPS is similar to satellite communication in the 1960s [3–5]. HAPS can be described as “a new wireless communication technology that has a broad application prospect and can overturn the development of telecom industry new technology.” It is the foundation of the next generation of wireless communication. It has to make full use of radio spectrum resources, large capacity of the system user, communication of good quality, low operational risk, and so on. You can upgrade communication load operation at any time.References [6, 7] present a suitable high-speed mobile near space HAPS channel estimation pilot sequence based on the traditional optimal wireless communication system pilot sequence. Each received-transmit antenna of HAPS wireless communication space system can be considered as independent HAPS system after insertion of the pilot sequence [8, 9]. ICI (Intersymbol Interference) coefficient and DFT (Discrete Fourier Transform) channel estimation algorithm are researched in [10, 11]; as long as this relationship is defined, we can get the outputs only by nonlinear computation. Furthermore, the feedback signal is calculated. It can use CAZAC (Constant Amplitude Zero Autocorrelation) sequence [12–15] as training sequence for channel estimation with fast moving system environment. This sequence will ensure the independence of each transmit antenna pilot frequency which can eliminate the interference of the pilot frequency when doing the channel estimation [10, 16, 17]. Transmitting antenna can send pilot frequency alternately which will avoid aliasing, namely, when transmitting pilot frequency information by one antenna while other antennas remain idle. Thus, channel response can be easily estimated between receiving-sending antennas. But in high-speed time-varying mobile environment, due to data subcarrier to pilot frequency subcarrier interference [11, 18], it is difficult to estimate each response to transmit-receive channel, thus seriously affecting the overall performance of the system. So it is said that the structure is only suitable for the slowly varying channel, and for high-speed mobile channel, this method cannot track channel changes [19–21].


## 1.2. Motivations

The above discussion implies that novel inequality methods allow us to obtain more precise SNR and lower BER. Most references do not consider the dynamic behaviors of wireless communication networks under near space. Wireless communication channel estimation modeling method inequality is presented in [22–25]. Under this method efficiency, novel channel estimation method and mathematics model could be proposed.


## 1.3. Our Work and Contributions

In this paper, the wireless communication channel estimation and modeling problem of near space by dynamic method is further investigated. By giving more precise estimation for the SNR and the lower BER, a new channel estimation method is obtained. Under this method, some novel results are presented. Based on the discrete dynamics topology structure, the fast dynamic channel mathematics model is derived. Simulation is employed to indicate the effectiveness of the proposed method and model.The main contributions of this paper are listed as follows. (1) A new wireless communication framework is introduced to improve the channel performance. (2) A novel channel estimation method and a new channel model are proposed. (3) A new discrete dynamics topology structure in network is built up. (4) The lower BER and higher SNR are obtained by the theoretical simulation results. These results are practical and objective.


## 1.4. Structure of the Paper

The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section2, HAPS wireless communication network is introduced. In Section 3, LS (Least Squares) channel estimation principle and SVD-LMMS’s channel estimation principle are studied. In Section 4, a new channel estimation and modeling method is proposed. In Section 5, the simulation analytical results are presented. Finally, conclusions are drawn in Section 6.


## 2. HAPS Network

### 2.1. Structure and Formation of HAPS Network

Figure1 shows the abstract model of the near space HAPS network system. HAPS complex network includes a set of forward that can perform routing and traffic management HAPS communication node. It can be implemented with a laser or microwave communication between them. It is a challenging problem about the link between HAPS [26].Figure 1
The abstract model of the near space HAPS network system.The geometric relationship of communications system of HAPS is shown in Figure2.Figure 2
The geometric relationships of communications system.Within the scope of the near-earth space, we use stable communications platform as a microwave relay station. With the ground control equipment, entrance equipment and a variety of wireless communication systems are in the composition of the user. High altitude platform can be comprehensive network and satellite ground and also can separate and ground network, as can be seen in Figure3. The communication platform to keep in sync with the earth’s rotation can reside in the air for a long time. High altitude platform communication has good waves transmission characteristics [27]. HAPS is a key instrumentality for broadband wireless communication, as it could complement and cooperate with satellite and terrestrial communications.Figure 3
The communication network structure of HAPS.


### 2.2. Discrete Dynamics Topology Structure in Network

Suppose that there aren nodes in the HAPS network. The complex dynamical HAPS network can be described as follows [28, 29]:(1)xik+1=fiXik+∑j=1naijhjxjk,i=1,2,…,n,where k represents the discrete point. xi(k)=(xi1(k),xi2(k),…,xiN(k))T∈RN expresses the state vector of i node. fi(Xi(k))=(fi1(xik),fi2(xik),…,fiNxik)T∈RN denotes the dynamic function of i node.h
j
(
x
j
(
k
)
)
=
(
h
j
1
(
x
i
k
)
,
h
j
2
(
x
i
k
)
,
…
,
h
i
N
(
x
j
(
k
)
)
)
T
∈
R
N is the output function of j node. The coupled matrix A=(aij)m×n illustrates the topological structures in HAPS network.We assume thatk=k1=(0,+∞), and the initial network topology is changing. For discrete time complex dynamical network, there are the following three situations [29, 30].Case 1.
Network node has not changed. But some of the edge network weights are changed. As is shown in Figures4(a) and 4(b), A(1,4) ranges from −0.8 to −0.5. A(5,8) ranges from 0 to 0.9. A(6,8) ranges from −0.5 to 0.Figure 4
Network topology structure.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Case 2.
Some nodes disappeared in the network that is associated with the removed node on the edge of weight to 0.As is shown in Figures4(a) and 4(c), if node 8 is removed, A(1,8) ranges from −0.8 to −0.5. A(8,7) ranges from −0.8 to 0. A(6,8) ranges from −0.5 to 0.Case 3.
A new node is joined to the network and connected to some existing nodes. These new sides have their respective weights. At the same time in the network, the already existing edge has not changed. As can be seen from Figures4(a) and 4(d), node 9 is newly joined, A(9,3)=0.9, A(9,5)=0.1.


## 2.1. Structure and Formation of HAPS Network

Figure1 shows the abstract model of the near space HAPS network system. HAPS complex network includes a set of forward that can perform routing and traffic management HAPS communication node. It can be implemented with a laser or microwave communication between them. It is a challenging problem about the link between HAPS [26].Figure 1
The abstract model of the near space HAPS network system.The geometric relationship of communications system of HAPS is shown in Figure2.Figure 2
The geometric relationships of communications system.Within the scope of the near-earth space, we use stable communications platform as a microwave relay station. With the ground control equipment, entrance equipment and a variety of wireless communication systems are in the composition of the user. High altitude platform can be comprehensive network and satellite ground and also can separate and ground network, as can be seen in Figure3. The communication platform to keep in sync with the earth’s rotation can reside in the air for a long time. High altitude platform communication has good waves transmission characteristics [27]. HAPS is a key instrumentality for broadband wireless communication, as it could complement and cooperate with satellite and terrestrial communications.Figure 3
The communication network structure of HAPS.


## 2.2. Discrete Dynamics Topology Structure in Network

Suppose that there aren nodes in the HAPS network. The complex dynamical HAPS network can be described as follows [28, 29]:(1)xik+1=fiXik+∑j=1naijhjxjk,i=1,2,…,n,where k represents the discrete point. xi(k)=(xi1(k),xi2(k),…,xiN(k))T∈RN expresses the state vector of i node. fi(Xi(k))=(fi1(xik),fi2(xik),…,fiNxik)T∈RN denotes the dynamic function of i node.h
j
(
x
j
(
k
)
)
=
(
h
j
1
(
x
i
k
)
,
h
j
2
(
x
i
k
)
,
…
,
h
i
N
(
x
j
(
k
)
)
)
T
∈
R
N is the output function of j node. The coupled matrix A=(aij)m×n illustrates the topological structures in HAPS network.We assume thatk=k1=(0,+∞), and the initial network topology is changing. For discrete time complex dynamical network, there are the following three situations [29, 30].Case 1.
Network node has not changed. But some of the edge network weights are changed. As is shown in Figures4(a) and 4(b), A(1,4) ranges from −0.8 to −0.5. A(5,8) ranges from 0 to 0.9. A(6,8) ranges from −0.5 to 0.Figure 4
Network topology structure.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Case 2.
Some nodes disappeared in the network that is associated with the removed node on the edge of weight to 0.As is shown in Figures4(a) and 4(c), if node 8 is removed, A(1,8) ranges from −0.8 to −0.5. A(8,7) ranges from −0.8 to 0. A(6,8) ranges from −0.5 to 0.Case 3.
A new node is joined to the network and connected to some existing nodes. These new sides have their respective weights. At the same time in the network, the already existing edge has not changed. As can be seen from Figures4(a) and 4(d), node 9 is newly joined, A(9,3)=0.9, A(9,5)=0.1.


## 3. The Principle of Traditional Channel Estimation

### 3.1. Least Squares Channel Estimation Principle

Least Squares (LS) is a kind of channel estimation algorithm, where the complexity is low. When the input signal of pilot frequencyX and the output signal Y are given, the channel estimation value H^ls can be obtained. The algorithm of LS channel estimation can be described as [31, 32](2)H^lsk=YkXk=Hk+σkXk,where H^ls(k) is the channel estimation value of LS algorithm, H(k) is the channel frequency response of LS algorithm, and σ(k) is additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN).Mean-Squared Error (MSE) of LS algorithm can be expressed as(3)MSE=βSNR.In the above formula,β is the modulation constant, which is related to the channel characteristic. Signal Noise Ratio (SNR) of LS algorithm can be described as(4)SNR=Ex2σ2k.As can be known by formulas (1), (2), and (3), the LS algorithm does not need to know the statistical features of channel in advance. But the noise has influence on the channel estimation. It makes the BER (Bit Error Rate) and MSE bigger.


### 3.2. SVD-LMMS’s Channel Estimation Principle

The channel estimation algorithm performance of criterion of Minimum Mean-Squared Error (MMSE) is better than the LS algorithm. The channel estimation algorithm of MMSE can be expressed as(5)H^mmsek=RhhRhh+σn2XXT-1-1H^lsk,where H^mmse(k) is the channel estimation value of MMSE algorithm. Rhh is the autocorrelation response function of the wireless communication channel. By considering the effect of noise in MMSE algorithm criterion, it has a higher channel estimation accuracy and low BER but also will increase its complexity.In the LMMSE (Linear Minimum Mean Square Error, LMMSE) algorithm criterion,(XXT)-1 is replaced by E[(XXT)-1]. The channel estimation algorithm of LMMSE can be expressed as [33, 34](6)H^lmmsek=RhhRhh+σn2EXXT-1-1H^lsk=RhhRhh+βSNR-1H^lsk.In the above formula, if the channel modulation method is QPSK,β is equal to 1, and if the channel modulation method is 16 QAM, β is equal to 17/9.Due to the correlation characteristics of the HAPS channel,β/SNR can be set to a fixed value, and the inverse matrix of Rhh+β/SNR can be calculated only at one time, so it can reduce the complexity of the algorithm effectively.But with the increase ofSNR, inverse operation will be more complex. In order to further improve channel estimation accuracy of LMMSE algorithm criterion and reduce the complexity of the algorithm criterion, the channel response autocorrelation function Rhh can be simplify processed by using the singular value decomposition (SVD) method. The SVD of Rhh can be described as(7)Rhh=UAUH,where U is a singular vector of the unitary matrix, A is a diagonal matrix singular value, and the diagonal elements are by order of singular value λ1≥λ2≥⋯≥λn≥0.So the LMMSE channel estimation based on SVD decomposition criteria can be obtained as follows [35]:(8)H^svd-lmmsek=UAA+βSNR-1UHH^lsk=UΔi000UHH^lsk.In the above formula, matrixΔi is the top left corner i∗i of the matrix Δ, and the diagonal elements can be described as(9)ik=λkλk+β/SNR,k=1,2,…,i0,k=i+1,…,N.Although, compared with traditional LMMSE algorithm, the SVD-LMMSE algorithm further simplifies the complexity of the system implementation. However, the accuracy of channel estimation can obviously do well and improve further.


## 3.1. Least Squares Channel Estimation Principle

Least Squares (LS) is a kind of channel estimation algorithm, where the complexity is low. When the input signal of pilot frequencyX and the output signal Y are given, the channel estimation value H^ls can be obtained. The algorithm of LS channel estimation can be described as [31, 32](2)H^lsk=YkXk=Hk+σkXk,where H^ls(k) is the channel estimation value of LS algorithm, H(k) is the channel frequency response of LS algorithm, and σ(k) is additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN).Mean-Squared Error (MSE) of LS algorithm can be expressed as(3)MSE=βSNR.In the above formula,β is the modulation constant, which is related to the channel characteristic. Signal Noise Ratio (SNR) of LS algorithm can be described as(4)SNR=Ex2σ2k.As can be known by formulas (1), (2), and (3), the LS algorithm does not need to know the statistical features of channel in advance. But the noise has influence on the channel estimation. It makes the BER (Bit Error Rate) and MSE bigger.


## 3.2. SVD-LMMS’s Channel Estimation Principle

The channel estimation algorithm performance of criterion of Minimum Mean-Squared Error (MMSE) is better than the LS algorithm. The channel estimation algorithm of MMSE can be expressed as(5)H^mmsek=RhhRhh+σn2XXT-1-1H^lsk,where H^mmse(k) is the channel estimation value of MMSE algorithm. Rhh is the autocorrelation response function of the wireless communication channel. By considering the effect of noise in MMSE algorithm criterion, it has a higher channel estimation accuracy and low BER but also will increase its complexity.In the LMMSE (Linear Minimum Mean Square Error, LMMSE) algorithm criterion,(XXT)-1 is replaced by E[(XXT)-1]. The channel estimation algorithm of LMMSE can be expressed as [33, 34](6)H^lmmsek=RhhRhh+σn2EXXT-1-1H^lsk=RhhRhh+βSNR-1H^lsk.In the above formula, if the channel modulation method is QPSK,β is equal to 1, and if the channel modulation method is 16 QAM, β is equal to 17/9.Due to the correlation characteristics of the HAPS channel,β/SNR can be set to a fixed value, and the inverse matrix of Rhh+β/SNR can be calculated only at one time, so it can reduce the complexity of the algorithm effectively.But with the increase ofSNR, inverse operation will be more complex. In order to further improve channel estimation accuracy of LMMSE algorithm criterion and reduce the complexity of the algorithm criterion, the channel response autocorrelation function Rhh can be simplify processed by using the singular value decomposition (SVD) method. The SVD of Rhh can be described as(7)Rhh=UAUH,where U is a singular vector of the unitary matrix, A is a diagonal matrix singular value, and the diagonal elements are by order of singular value λ1≥λ2≥⋯≥λn≥0.So the LMMSE channel estimation based on SVD decomposition criteria can be obtained as follows [35]:(8)H^svd-lmmsek=UAA+βSNR-1UHH^lsk=UΔi000UHH^lsk.In the above formula, matrixΔi is the top left corner i∗i of the matrix Δ, and the diagonal elements can be described as(9)ik=λkλk+β/SNR,k=1,2,…,i0,k=i+1,…,N.Although, compared with traditional LMMSE algorithm, the SVD-LMMSE algorithm further simplifies the complexity of the system implementation. However, the accuracy of channel estimation can obviously do well and improve further.


## 4. Proposed Channel Estimate and Modeling

Each time-varying tap coefficienth(n,l) of HAPS channel can be set up by base function bq(n) and base coefficient gq(l). Specifically, the formula is as follows:(10)hn,l=∑q=0Qbqngqln=0,1,…,N-1,l=0,1,…,L-1,where Q is the order. Q≥2fdmaxNTs. fdmax denotes the maximum Doppler frequency shift.T
s denotes the sampling interval. Formula (9) can be expressed in matrix form as follows:(11)hll=Bgl,where(12)hl=h0,l,h1,l,…,hN-1,l,gl=g0l,g1l,…,gQlT,bq=bq0,bq1,…,bqN-1T,B=b0,b1,…,bQ.The base functionbq(n) can be expressed as(13)bqn=exp⁡jwqn,n=0,1,…,N-1.It can be assumed that the channel tap covariance matrixRl is(14)Rl=EhllhlH.Then with the eigenvalue decomposition of formula (13), we can get(15)RlΦl=ΛlΦl,Λl=λ0,lλ1,l⋯λN-1,l.According to the above formulas, the matrixB can be drawn out.(16)B=Φl:,1:Q+1.The variance ofl channel tap is σl2. The correlation function of tap channel can be obtained as follows:(17)Ehn,lh∗n-m=σl2J02πmfdmaxTs.Because there are different kinds of Doppler spectrum in the actual environment, the correlation function of l tap channel can be expressed as(18)Ehn,lh∗n-m=σl2sin⁡2πmfdmaxTsπm.For multiple-input-multiple-output antenna systems, the system channel capacity can be expressed as(19)C=log2detINt+ρNrHHHb/s/Hz,where Nr is the number of the receive antennas and Nt is the number of the transmit antennas. ρ denotes the signal-to-noise ratio of the receiving antenna. H is the channel response matrix of Nt×Nr.It is assumed that the channel is an independent fading channel, and the capacity of the antenna system can be further stated as follows:(20)C=min⁡Nr,NtBlog2ρ¯2b/s/Hz,where B is the channel bandwidth. ρ¯ denotes the average signal-to-noise ratio of the receiving antenna.In the fast moving environment, the normalized Doppler frequency shiftfDmax can be defined as(21)fDmax=vfccTsN,where v is the moving speed of the mobile platform. fc is the carrier frequency.It can be used by the normalized Mean Square Error (MSE) to measure the HAPS channel estimation performance in the simulation; it can be defined as(22)NMSE=1/NEhn,l-h^n,l21/NEhn,l2.


## 5. Simulation Analysis

The modulation mode of HAPS wireless communication system is 16 QAM. The number of signal carrier is 256. The coding rate is 3/4. The carrier frequency is 2 GHz. The relationship between the normalized Doppler frequency shift and NMSE is shown in Figure5.Figure 5
Proposed method analysis.As can be seen from Figure5, the traditional LS method has the maximum error compared with the MMSE and the proposed model method. The simulation results show that performance of the proposed channel estimation is much better than the traditional LS and SVD-LMMS method. The relationship between simulated and theoretical CDF is shown in Figure 6.Figure 6
Proposed method analysis.As can be seen from Figure6, those simulation results, which are based on the real data and the proposed mathematics model, reflect the property of physical experiment to a certain extent. The values of the simulation and the calculation of proposed mathematics model are accordant basically and also have the same change tendency.We are also interested in checking whether the obtained magnitude variations follow a Rayleigh distribution. To verify this, the sample cumulative distribution, CDF, was calculated and then compared with the theoretical CDF (Rayleigh CDF). It is possible to link the simulation parameters, namely, the number of rays,N, and the ray amplitudes, ai, with the Rayleigh distribution parameters; the following expression is fulfilled: ∑i=1Nai2=Na2=2σ2.As can be seen from Figure7, it shows the simulated and theoretical CDF. A very good agreement can be observed. According to the simulation results, the proposed method and model are correct and effective. The relationship between SNR and BER is shown in Figure 8.Figure 7
Comparison of theoretical Rayleigh and simulated CDF.Figure 8
Compared with different methods.As can be seen from Figure8, the new channel estimation method is superior to LS (Least Squares) channel estimation SVD-LMMS’s channel estimation principle, respectively. Besides, the channel estimation performance of SVD-LMMS method is better than traditional LS method. When the BER is 0.8, the proposed method has approximately the 3~10 dB system gain compared with the LS and SVD-LMMS method.


## 6. Summary

Through the analysis of the channel characteristics of HAPS wireless communication system, some effective conclusions can be obtained by the simulation analysis. The channel characteristics of the HAPS high-speed channel fading environment are analyzed, there are two traditional channel estimation models, and methods (LS and SVD-LMMS) are introduced in the HAPS wireless communication system. In order to improve the accuracy of high-speed mobile channel estimation of HAPS systems and inhibit intercarrier interference, this paper proposes a new channel estimation algorithm and model based on basis expansion model. The simulations reveal that the performance of proposed channel estimation outperforms traditional LS and SVD-LMMS method. Result also shows that this proposed algorithm is close to the optimum at effectiveness and efficiency with much fewer computations.



---

*Source: 5939810-2017-05-30.xml*