# Lack of Association between Genetic Polymorphisms of JAK-STAT Signaling Pathway Genes and Acute Anterior Uveitis in Han Chinese

Authors: Ling Cheng; Hongsong Yu; Yan Jiang; Juan He; Sisi Pu; Xin Li; Li Zhang
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

Purpose. This study aimed to investigate the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of JAK-STAT signaling pathway genes and acute anterior uveitis (AAU) with or without ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in the Han Chinese population.Methods. Eleven SNPs of theJAK1,JAK2,STAT1,IRF1, andNOS2 genes were analyzed in 443 AAU patients with AS, 486 AAU patients without AS, and 714 healthy controls. Genotyping was performed by PCR-RFLP assay or TaqMan® probe assay. The Chi-squared (χ2) test and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to compare the distributions of alleles and genotypes between patients and controls. P values were adjusted using Bonferroni correction.Results. We did not observe significant differences in the genotype and allele frequencies of any SNP between AAU patients with or without AS and healthy controls. Stratification analyses by gender and HLA-B27 status showed a boundary significant association between two SNPs (rs10975003 and rs10758669) inJAK2 and AAU (P=0.052 and P=0.053, resp.).Conclusions. Our results indicated that genetic polymorphisms of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway genes may not be associated with AAU in the Han Chinese population.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Uveitis is one of the major ocular diseases leading to blindness and visual impairment. The prevalence of uveitis is 111.3 per 100,000 persons in Taiwan [1] compared with 40.4 per 100,000 persons in Japan [2] and 115.3 per 100,000 persons in United States [3]. In the clinic, acute anterior uveitis (AAU), which may be accompanied by complicated phenotypes including cataract and glaucoma [4], is the most common type of uveitis [5]. Evidence suggests that the occurrence of AAU is associated with the prognosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) [6, 7]. The frequency of AAU, which is characterized by positive human leukocyte antigen- (HLA-) B27, varies across different ethnic populations [8–10]. In the United States and Western Europe, the prevalence of HLA-B27 with AAU is up to 50% [5, 8, 11]. Previous studies have reported that there is a strong association between AS and HLA-B27 in various ethnic groups [12–14]. Further study showed that the percentage of AAU accompanied by AS is 30–40%, suggesting that there may be linked pathogenesis between AAU and AS [15]. AAU and AS may share certain genetic associations, but several susceptibility genes seem to be unique for each disease [16]. Genes includingTNFSF15,TRAF5, andFoxO1 have been reported to be associated with AAU [17–19]. However, a lack of association with AAU has been demonstrated for other genes, includingCTLA4 andPTPN22 [20, 21]. A recent study revealed that T lymphocyte subsets (Th1 and Th17) and CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells were involved in the development of HLA-B27 positive AAU [22, 23]. Furthermore, a higher level of Th17 cells has been observed in the peripheral blood of patients with AS [24].The Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) signaling pathway plays a major role in T lymphocyte differentiation and function [25, 26].JAK1 andJAK2 have been reported to play an important role in Th1 and Th17 cell differentiation [27].STAT1 is critical to T lymphocyte differentiation and function [25, 26, 28].STAT1 is activated by type I interferons (IFNs) and IFN-γ and plays an important role in immune responses [29].IRF1is the first member identified in the IRF family and is involved in many innate and adaptive immune responses [30]. Impaired or absent Th1-type immune responses favor Th2 differentiation inIRF1-deficient mice [31, 32].NOS2-derived NO, a key factor in immunoregulation [33], can inhibit Th1 as well as Th2 cytokine production and regulate the development of FoxP3+ Treg cells [34, 35]. In summary, JAK-STAT signaling pathway genes, includingJAK1, JAK2, STAT1, IRF1, andNOS2, have been suggested to be strongly linked with T cells and may be involved in the pathophysiology of AAU with or without AS.Thus, we conducted the present case-control study to investigate whether JAK-STAT signaling pathway genes confer susceptibility to AAU risk in a Chinese Han population.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Subjects

A total of 929 AAU patients were enrolled in this study, including 443 patients with AS (AAU+AS+) and 486 patients without AS (AAU+AS−), as well as 714 gender- and race-matched healthy controls. All subjects were Han Chinese recruited from the Department of Ophthalmology in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (Chongqing, China) between June 2008 and May 2015. All AAU patients were diagnosed based on medical records, physical examinations, and the anatomic location of inflammation as previously described by Jabs et al. [36]. The diagnosis of AS followed the modified New York Criteria [37]. All subjects gave written informed consent before blood collection. This study was approved by the Human Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (Approval number: 2009-201008) and followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.


### 2.2. SNP Selection

We selected candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) based on previously published studies and included only those SNPs significantly associated with autoimmune diseases [38–45]. We used HaploView 4.2 software to evaluate the linkage disequilibrium (LD) and minor allele frequency (MAF) of the SNPs. Five SNPs ofJAK1, rs2780815, rs3790532, rs310230, rs310236, and rs310241 [41, 42], were selected. Since the SNPs rs3790532, rs310230, rs310236, and rs310241 are in strong LD with each other (r2>0.8, Figure 1), we only used rs310241 in our study. Furthermore, we also eliminated SNPs that were not polymorphic in the Chinese population. Finally, eleven SNPs in five JAK-STAT signaling pathway genes were tested in our study, including two SNPs in the intron region of theJAK1 gene (rs310241, rs2780815) [41], two SNPs in the exon region and 3′UTR of theJAK2 gene (rs10758669, rs10975003) [38, 45], one SNP in the intron region of theIRF1gene (rs2070721), four SNPs in the exon region and intron region of theSTAT1 gene (rs2066802, rs1547550, rs6718902, and rs10199181) [39, 40], and two SNPs in the exon region and intron region of theNOS2 gene (rs2297518, rs4795067) [43, 44].Figure 1
Linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis of rs2780815, rs310241, rs3790532, rs310236, and rs310230 in theJAK1gene. The LD block was estimated by HaploView software version 4.2 using the Chinese Han HapMap data. The number in the square indicates the r2 value.


### 2.3. DNA Extraction and Genotyping

Peripheral blood samples were collected from subjects, and genomic DNA extraction was performed using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). The genomic DNA was quantified with NanoDrop 2000 (Thermal Fisher Scientific, Delaware, USA) and stored at −20°C until use. Three SNPs (rs2780815, rs2070721, and rs10199181) were genotyped by TaqMan probe (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), and the others were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) assay. The specific primers for PCR and restriction enzymes are described in Table1. The PCR reactions were performed under the following conditions: denaturation at 95°C for 5 minutes, 33 to 36 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 seconds, annealing at 56–64°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 seconds and a final extension at 72°C for 5 minutes. The enzyme-digested products were visualized on 3% or 4% agarose gels and stained with GoldView (SBS Genetech, Beijing, China). Direct sequencing was carried out randomly on 10% of the study samples to assure the validity of the SNP genotyping method used. The success rate of all SNP genotyping ranged from 97.3% to 100%.Table 1
PCR primer sequences and restriction enzymes.
SNP Primers Restriction enzyme rs310241 5′ AACCACCAGCTCAACATTCCTAG 3′5′ CAGCCAGGTCTCCCGTAGG 3′ BseDI rs6718902 5′ CGGACAAAAGCATGCACTAGA 3′5′ CCACCACCATTAATAGGTGACTTTA 3′ DraI rs2297518 5′ TGAGCTCTTTCAGCATGAAGATC 3′5′ CTTCCGTGGTGGGCTGTG 3′ TaqI rs10758669 5′ TGATGTAGAGACAAGGACATGCTGAGGTAC 3′5′ GCCAAAAGACAAAGGCAAGGGG 3′ BanI rs10975003 5′ GGCCAGTCAAGAAAAAACCAGTT 3′5′ TTCGGAGTCTTGTCTGAGCATGT 3′ HpaI rs4795067 5′ GCACTCATTCATTCATGCAAACATA 3′5′ GGCAGAACTTGAACCCCAGCT 3′ NdeI rs1547550 5′ CTTCTCTAGGAGGCCCAGCA 3′5′ TGGGCACCACGATATGAGAG 3′ BstMAI rs2066802 5′ ATTCCTGGAGCAGGTTCACAAG 3′5′ AAACATGGCCCCAAGTCACT 3′ HindIII


### 2.4. Statistical Analysis

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was analyzed by theχ2 test. The distributions of the allele and genotype frequencies between the patients and controls were compared by the χ2 test. Multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for age and gender was further adopted to test the associations between the SNPs and AAU. The risk effect of each SNP was measured by odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). There were four different models of inheritance in our study, including additive models, codominant models, dominant models, and recessive models. P values were corrected using the Bonferroni correction method considering multiple tests. Statistical significance level was defined as a corrected P value < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).


## 2.1. Subjects

A total of 929 AAU patients were enrolled in this study, including 443 patients with AS (AAU+AS+) and 486 patients without AS (AAU+AS−), as well as 714 gender- and race-matched healthy controls. All subjects were Han Chinese recruited from the Department of Ophthalmology in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (Chongqing, China) between June 2008 and May 2015. All AAU patients were diagnosed based on medical records, physical examinations, and the anatomic location of inflammation as previously described by Jabs et al. [36]. The diagnosis of AS followed the modified New York Criteria [37]. All subjects gave written informed consent before blood collection. This study was approved by the Human Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (Approval number: 2009-201008) and followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.


## 2.2. SNP Selection

We selected candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) based on previously published studies and included only those SNPs significantly associated with autoimmune diseases [38–45]. We used HaploView 4.2 software to evaluate the linkage disequilibrium (LD) and minor allele frequency (MAF) of the SNPs. Five SNPs ofJAK1, rs2780815, rs3790532, rs310230, rs310236, and rs310241 [41, 42], were selected. Since the SNPs rs3790532, rs310230, rs310236, and rs310241 are in strong LD with each other (r2>0.8, Figure 1), we only used rs310241 in our study. Furthermore, we also eliminated SNPs that were not polymorphic in the Chinese population. Finally, eleven SNPs in five JAK-STAT signaling pathway genes were tested in our study, including two SNPs in the intron region of theJAK1 gene (rs310241, rs2780815) [41], two SNPs in the exon region and 3′UTR of theJAK2 gene (rs10758669, rs10975003) [38, 45], one SNP in the intron region of theIRF1gene (rs2070721), four SNPs in the exon region and intron region of theSTAT1 gene (rs2066802, rs1547550, rs6718902, and rs10199181) [39, 40], and two SNPs in the exon region and intron region of theNOS2 gene (rs2297518, rs4795067) [43, 44].Figure 1
Linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis of rs2780815, rs310241, rs3790532, rs310236, and rs310230 in theJAK1gene. The LD block was estimated by HaploView software version 4.2 using the Chinese Han HapMap data. The number in the square indicates the r2 value.


## 2.3. DNA Extraction and Genotyping

Peripheral blood samples were collected from subjects, and genomic DNA extraction was performed using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). The genomic DNA was quantified with NanoDrop 2000 (Thermal Fisher Scientific, Delaware, USA) and stored at −20°C until use. Three SNPs (rs2780815, rs2070721, and rs10199181) were genotyped by TaqMan probe (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), and the others were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) assay. The specific primers for PCR and restriction enzymes are described in Table1. The PCR reactions were performed under the following conditions: denaturation at 95°C for 5 minutes, 33 to 36 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 seconds, annealing at 56–64°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 seconds and a final extension at 72°C for 5 minutes. The enzyme-digested products were visualized on 3% or 4% agarose gels and stained with GoldView (SBS Genetech, Beijing, China). Direct sequencing was carried out randomly on 10% of the study samples to assure the validity of the SNP genotyping method used. The success rate of all SNP genotyping ranged from 97.3% to 100%.Table 1
PCR primer sequences and restriction enzymes.
SNP Primers Restriction enzyme rs310241 5′ AACCACCAGCTCAACATTCCTAG 3′5′ CAGCCAGGTCTCCCGTAGG 3′ BseDI rs6718902 5′ CGGACAAAAGCATGCACTAGA 3′5′ CCACCACCATTAATAGGTGACTTTA 3′ DraI rs2297518 5′ TGAGCTCTTTCAGCATGAAGATC 3′5′ CTTCCGTGGTGGGCTGTG 3′ TaqI rs10758669 5′ TGATGTAGAGACAAGGACATGCTGAGGTAC 3′5′ GCCAAAAGACAAAGGCAAGGGG 3′ BanI rs10975003 5′ GGCCAGTCAAGAAAAAACCAGTT 3′5′ TTCGGAGTCTTGTCTGAGCATGT 3′ HpaI rs4795067 5′ GCACTCATTCATTCATGCAAACATA 3′5′ GGCAGAACTTGAACCCCAGCT 3′ NdeI rs1547550 5′ CTTCTCTAGGAGGCCCAGCA 3′5′ TGGGCACCACGATATGAGAG 3′ BstMAI rs2066802 5′ ATTCCTGGAGCAGGTTCACAAG 3′5′ AAACATGGCCCCAAGTCACT 3′ HindIII


## 2.4. Statistical Analysis

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was analyzed by theχ2 test. The distributions of the allele and genotype frequencies between the patients and controls were compared by the χ2 test. Multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for age and gender was further adopted to test the associations between the SNPs and AAU. The risk effect of each SNP was measured by odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). There were four different models of inheritance in our study, including additive models, codominant models, dominant models, and recessive models. P values were corrected using the Bonferroni correction method considering multiple tests. Statistical significance level was defined as a corrected P value < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Clinical Features of AAU Patients

The detailed clinical features and demographic characteristics of the AAU patients are presented in Table2. All 929 AAU patients include 569 (61.2%) males and 360 (38.8%) females. The 714 control subjects consisted of 428 (59.9%) males and 286 (40.1%) females. The average age was 39.8 ± 12.3 in AAU patients and 39.5 ± 10.8 in the controls, respectively. There were no significant differences in age and gender between the cases and controls. In addition, 546 AAU patients (68.9%) were HLA-B27-positive, whereas 246 AAU patients (31.1%) were HLA-B27-negative.Table 2
Clinical characteristics of the investigated subjects.
Clinical features Total Percentage AAU patients 929 100 Mean age ± SD (years) 39.8 ± 12.3 AAU with AS 443 47.7 AAU without AS 486 52.3 AAU male 569 61.2 AAU female 360 38.8 AAU with AS (male) 326 (443 tested) 73.6 AAU with AS (female) 117 (443 tested) 26.4 AAU without AS (male) 243 (486 tested) 50 AAU without AS (female) 243 (486 tested) 50 HLA-B27+ AAU 546 (792 tested) 68.9 HLA-B27+AAU AS+ 348 (428 tested) 81.3 HLA-B27+AAU AS− 198 (364 tested) 54.4 Control 714 100 Mean age ± SD (years) 39.5 ± 10.8 Male 428 59.9 Female 286 40.1


### 3.2. The Genotype and Allele Frequency Distribution of the Tested SNPs in AAU

Eleven SNPs of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway genes (JAK1, JAK2, STAT1, IRF1, andNOS2) were successfully genotyped. There were no significant deviations of HWE in either the cases or controls. We did not observe significant differences in the genotype and allele distributions of any of the SNPs between the AAU patients and control subjects after Bonferroni correction (see Supplementary Table S1 in Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5896906). Further stratified analyses of gender, AS, and HLA-B27 status showed a boundary significant association of two SNPs (rs10975003 and rs10758669) ofJAK2 with AAU. In female AS-positive AAU patients, there was a decreased frequency of the TT genotype of rs10975003 compared to the female controls (OR=0.55; P=1.59×10-3; PBonferroni=0.052, Table 3), whereas no significant differences were observed in the genotype and allele frequencies of the other ten SNPs (PBonferroni>0.05, Table 3). Similarly, there were no significant differences in the genotype and allele frequencies of the SNPs between the male AAU patients and male controls (PBonferroni>0.05, Supplementary Table S2).Table 3
Allele and genotype frequencies in female AAU patients and female controls.
Gene SNP Allele and genotype AAU+AS+ (female) AAU+AS− (female) Controls (female) P (AS+) Pc (AS+) OR (95% CI) P (AS−) Pc (AS−) OR (95% CI) JAK1 rs310241 C 80 (33.3%) 138 (29.6%) 156 (28.7%) 0.19 NS 1.24 (0.90–1.72) 0.74 NS 1.05 (0.80–1.37) CC 12 (10.0%) 14 (6.0%) 17 (6.2%) 0.19 NS 1.67 (0.77–3.61) 0.91 NS 0.96 (0.46–2.00) CT 56 (46.7%) 110 (47.2%) 122 (44.9%) 0.74 NS 1.08 (0.70–1.66) 0.60 NS 1.10 (0.77–1.56) TT 52 (43.3%) 109 (46.8%) 133 (48.9%) 0.31 NS 0.80 (0.52–1.23) 0.64 NS 0.92 (0.65–1.30) rs2780815 G 159 (78.7%) 400 (87.0%) 495 (85.3%) 0.03 NS 0.64 (0.42–0.96) 0.45 NS 1.15 (0.80–1.63) GG 63 (62.4%) 175 (76.1%) 212 (73.1%) 0.04 NS 0.61 (0.38–0.99) 0.44 NS 1.17 (0.79–1.75) GT 33 (32.6%) 50 (21.7%) 71 (24.5%) 0.11 NS 1.50 (0.91–2.45) 0.46 NS 0.86 (0.57–1.29) TT 5 (5.0%) 5 (2.2%) 7 (2.4%) 0.20 NS 2.11 (0.65–6.80) 0.86 NS 0.90 (0.28–2.87)  JAK2 rs10758669 A 170 (73.9%) 328 (67.5%) 399 (72.3%) 0.64 NS 1.09 (0.77–1.54) 0.10 NS 0.80 (0.61–1.04) AA 59 (51.3%) 104 (42.8%) 144 (52.2%) 0.88 NS 0.97 (0.63–1.49) 0.03 NS 0.69 (0.49–1.00) AC 52 (45.2%) 120 (49.4%) 111 (40.2%) 0.36 NS 1.23 (0.79–1.90) 0.04 NS 1.45 (1.02–2.05) CC 4 (3.5%) 19 (7.8%) 21 (7.6%) 0.13 NS 0.44 (0.15–1.30) 0.93 NS 1.03 (0.54–1.97) rs10975003 C 44 (20.6%) 117 (25.8%) 93 (17.9%) 0.40 NS 1.19 (0.80–1.77) 2.83 × 10−3 0.09 1.59 (1.17–2.17) CC 2 (1.9%) 11 (4.8%) 8 (3.1%) 0.52 NS 0.60 (0.13–2.87) 0.32 NS 1.60 (0.63–4.06) CT 40 (37.4%) 95 (41.9%) 77 (29.6%) 0.15 NS 1.42 (0.88–2.28) 4.83 × 10−3 NS 1.71 (1.18–2.49) TT 65 (60.7%) 121 (53.3%) 175 (67.3%) 0.23 NS 0.75 (0.47–1.20) 1.59 × 10−3 0.052 0.55 (0.38–0.80)  STAT1 rs1547550 C 205 (86.9%) 411 (88.6%) 423 (87.0%) 0.95 NS 0.99 (0.62–1.56) 0.47 NS 1.16 (0.78–1.71) CC 88 (74.6%) 182 (78.4%) 185 (76.1%) 0.75 NS 0.92 (0.55–1.53) 0.55 NS 1.14 (0.74–1.75) CG 29 (24.6%) 47 (20.3%) 53 (21.8%) 0.56 NS 1.17 (0.70–1.96) 0.68 NS 0.91 (0.59–1.42) GG 1 (0.8%) 3 (1.3%) 5 (2.1%) 0.40 NS 0.41 (0.05–3.52) 0.56 NS 0.65 (0.15–2.76) rs2066802 C 46 (20.4%) 81 (17.4%) 113 (21.2%) 0.80 NS 0.95 (0.65–1.40) 0.13 NS 0.78 (0.57–1.08) CC 1 (0.9%) 6 (2.6%) 8 (3.0%) 0.22 NS 0.29 (0.04–2.34) 0.78 NS 0.86 (0.29–2.50) CT 44 (38.9%) 69 (29.6%) 97 (36.3%) 0.63 NS 1.12 (0.71–1.76) 0.11 NS 0.74 (0.51–1.07) TT 68 (60.2%) 158 (67.8%) 162 (60.7%) 0.93 NS 0.98 (0.63–1.54) 0.10 NS 1.37 (0.95–1.97) rs6718902 C 132 (60.0%) 259 (54.2%) 308 (53.8%) 0.12 NS 1.29 (0.94–1.76) 0.91 NS 1.01 (0.79–1.29) CC 36 (32.7%) 72 (30.1%) 82 (28.7%) 0.43 NS 1.21 (0.75–1.94) 0.72 NS 1.07 (0.74–1.56) CT 60 (54.5%) 115 (48.1%) 144 (50.3%) 0.45 NS 1.18 (0.76–1.84) 0.61 NS 0.92 (0.65–1.29) TT 14 (12.7%) 52 (21.8%) 60 (21.0%) 0.06 NS 0.55 (0.29–1.03) 0.83 NS 1.05 (0.69–1.59) rs10199181 A 51 (24.8%) 117 (26.1%) 148 (25.2%) 0.91 NS 0.98 (0.68–1.41) 0.73 NS 1.05 (0.79–1.39) AA 6 (5.8%) 20 (8.9%) 19 (6.5%) 0.82 NS 0.90 (0.35–2.31) 0.29 NS 1.42 (0.74–2.73) AT 39 (37.9%) 77 (34.4%) 110 (37.4%) 0.94 NS 1.02 (0.64–1.62) 0.48 NS 0.88 (0.61–1.26) TT 58 (56.3%) 127 (56.7%) 165 (56.1%) 0.97 NS 1.01 (0.64–1.58) 0.90 NS 1.02 (0.72–1.45)  IRF1 rs2070721 A 86 (40.6%) 154 (33.9%) 216 (34.3%) 0.10 NS 1.31 (0.95–1.80) 0.90 NS 0.98 (0.76–1.27) AA 15 (14.2%) 26 (11.5%) 29 (9.2%) 0.15 NS 1.63 (0.84–3.17) 0.39 NS 1.28 (0.73–2.23) AC 56 (52.8%) 102 (44.9%) 158 (50.2%) 0.63 NS 1.11 (0.72–1.73) 0.23 NS 0.81 (0.58–1.14) CC 35 (33.0%) 99 (43.6%) 128 (40.6%) 0.16 NS 0.72 (0.45–1.14) 0.49 NS 1.13 (0.80–1.60)  NOS2 rs2297518 A 52 (20.5%) 69 (15.2%) 74 (15.7%) 0.10 NS 1.39 (0.94–2.05) 0.84 NS 0.96 (0.68–1.38) AA 3 (2.4%) 6 (2.6%) 2 (0.8%) 0.24 NS 2.83 (0.47–17.17) 0.14 NS 3.18 (0.63–15.90) AG 46 (36.2%) 57 (25.2%) 70 (29.7%) 0.20 NS 1.35 (0.85–2.13) 0.27 NS 0.80 (0.53–1.20) GG 78 (61.4%) 164 (72.2%) 164 (69.5%) 0.12 NS 0.70 (0.45–1.10) 0.51 NS 1.14 (0.77–1.71) rs4795067 A 173 (73.9%) 369 (75.9%) 439 (77.8%) 0.24 NS 0.81 (0.57–1.15) 0.46 NS 0.90 (0.67–1.20) AA 62 (53.0%) 145 (59.7%) 169 (59.9%) 0.20 NS 0.75 (0.49–1.16) 0.95 NS 0.99 (0.70–1.40) AG 49 (41.9%) 79 (32.5%) 101 (35.8%) 0.26 NS 1.29 (0.83–2.01) 0.43 NS 0.86 (0.60–1.24) GG 6 (5.1%) 19 (7.8%) 12 (4.3%) 0.70 NS 1.22 (0.45–3.32) 0.08 NS 1.91 (0.91–4.02) OR = odds ratio; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval. Pc =P value adjusted by Bonferroni correction.In addition, an increased frequency of the AC genotype in rs10758669 was observed in HLA-B27-positive AAU patients compared to the healthy controls (OR=1.44; P=1.62×10-3; PBonferroni=0.053, Table 4), whereas there were no significant differences in the genotype and allele frequencies of the other ten SNPs between the HLA-B27-positive AAU patients and the control subjects (PBonferroni>0.05, Table 4).Table 4
Allele and genotype frequencies of SNPs in patients with AAU versus control subjects stratified by HLA-B27 status.
Gene SNP Allele and genotype AAUHLA-B27 Control P Pc OR (95% CI) JAK1 rs310241 C 324 (31.0%) 392 (27.5%) 0.06 NS 1.18 (1.00–1.41) CC 41 (7.9%) 45 (6.3%) 0.29 NS 1.27 (0.82–1.96) CT 242 (46.4%) 302 (42.4%) 0.16 NS 1.18 (0.94–1.48) TT 239 (45.7%) 366 (51.3%) 0.05 NS 0.80 (0.64–1.00) rs2780815 G 878 (86.2%) 1250 (87.5%) 0.35 NS 0.89 (0.70–1.13) GG 381 (74.8%) 548 (76.7%) 0.44 NS 0.90 (0.69–1.18) GT 116 (22.8%) 154 (21.6%) 0.61 NS 1.07 (0.82–1.41) TT 12 (2.4%) 12 (1.7%) 0.40 NS 1.41 (0.63–3.17)  JAK2 rs10758669 A 705 (65.9%) 980 (69.0%) 0.10 NS 0.87 (0.73–1.03) AA 220 (41.1%) 346 (48.7%) 0.08 NS 0.74 (0.59–0.92) AC 265 (49.5%) 288 (40.6%) 1.62 × 10−3 0.053 1.44 (1.15–1.80) CC 50 (9.4%) 76 (10.7%) 0.43 NS 0.86 (0.59–1.25) rs10975003 C 251 (24.5%) 272 (21.2%) 0.05 NS 1.21 (1.00–1.47) CC 26 (5.1%) 28 (4.4%) 0.56 NS 1.18 (0.68–2.03) CT 199 (38.8%) 216 (33.5%) 0.06 NS 1.26 (0.99–1.60) TT 287 (56.1%) 399 (62.1%) 0.03 NS 0.77 (0.61–0.98)  STAT1 rs1547550 C 937 (87.2%) 1254 (87.8%) 0.67 NS 0.95 (0.75–1.21) CC 407 (75.8%) 555 (77.7%) 0.42 NS 0.90 (0.69–1.17) CG 123 (22.9%) 144 (20.2%) 0.24 NS 1.18 (0.90–1.54) GG 7 (1.3%) 15 (2.1%) 0.29 NS 0.62 (0.25–1.52) rs2066802 C 190 (19.3%) 288 (20.7%) 0.39 NS 0.91 (0.74–1.12) CC 15 (3.0%) 27 (3.9%) 0.44 NS 0.78 (0.41–1.48) CT 160 (32.5%) 234 (33.7%) 0.66 NS 0.95 (0.74–1.21) TT 318 (64.5%) 434 (62.4%) 0.47 NS 1.09 (0.86–1.39) rs6718902 C 584 (56.5%) 778 (54.5%) 0.33 NS 1.08 (0.92–1.27) CC 163 (31.5%) 209 (29.3%) 0.40 NS 1.11 (0.87–1.42) CT 258 (49.9%) 360 (50.4%) 0.86 NS 0.98 (0.78–1.23) TT 96 (18.6%) 145 (20.3%) 0.45 NS 0.90 (0.67–1.19) rs10199181 A 270 (27.2%) 397 (27.8%) 0.75 NS 0.97 (0.81–1.16) AA 43 (8.7%) 55 (7.7%) 0.55 NS 1.14 (0.75–1.73) AT 184 (37.1%) 287 (40.2%) 0.28 NS 0.88 (0.69–1.11) TT 269 (54.2%) 372 (52.1%) 0.47 NS 1.09 (0.87–1.37)  IRF1 rs2070721 A 356 (35.7%) 487 (34.1%) 0.40 NS 1.08(0.91–1.27) AA 61 (12.2%) 74 (10.4%) 0.30 NS 1.21 (0.84–1.73) AC 234 (47.0%) 339 (47.4%) 0.87 NS 0.98 (0.78–1.23) CC 203 (40.8%) 301 (42.2%) 0.63 NS 0.94 (0.75–1.19)  NOS2 rs2297518 A 194 (18.1%) 209 (16.2%) 0.21 NS 1.15 (0.93–1.42) AA 12 (2.3%) 12 (1.9%) 0.64 NS 1.21 (0.54–2.72) AG 170 (31.7%) 185 (28.6%) 0.24 NS 1.16 (0.90–1.49) GG 354 (66.0%) 450 (69.5%) 0.20 NS 0.85 (0.67–1.09) rs4795067 A 797 (74.3%) 1008 (76.1%) 0.35 NS 0.92 (0.76–1.10) AA 293 (54.6%) 382 (57.7%) 0.33 NS 0.89 (0.71–1.23) AG 211 (39.4%) 244 (36.9%) 0.37 NS 1.11 (0.88–1.41) GG 32 (6.0%) 36 (5.4%) 0.69 NS 1.10 (0.68–1.80) OR = odds ratio; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval. Pc =P value adjusted by Bonferroni correction.However, an increased frequency of the rs10758669/AC genotype was observed in HLA-B27-positive AS-positive AAU patients compared to healthy controls (OR=1.49; P=2.56×10-3; PBonferroni=0.084, Table 5), whereas no significant differences in the genotype and allele frequencies of the other 10 SNPs were observed between the HLA-B27-positive AS-positive AAU patients and healthy controls (PBonferroni>0.05, Table 5). In addition, there were no significant differences in the genotype and allele frequencies of the tested SNPs between the AS-positive AAU patients and control subjects (PBonferroni>0.05, Supplementary Table S3).Table 5
Allele and genotype frequencies of SNPs in patients with AAU versus control subjects stratified by AS and HLA-B27 status.
Gene SNP Allele and genotype AAU+AS+ HLA-B27 AAU+AS− HLA-B27 Control P (AS+) Pc (AS+) OR (95% CI) P (AS-) Pc (AS−) OR (95% CI) JAK1 rs310241 C 205 (31.6%) 119 (29.9%) 392 (27.5%) 0.05 NS 1.22 (1.00–1.49) 0.32 NS 1.13 (0.88–1.45) CC 30 (9.3%) 11 (5.5%) 45 (6.3%) 0.09 NS 1.52 (0.94–2.45) 0.70 NS 0.87 (0.44–1.72) CT 145 (44.7%) 97 (48.7%) 302 (42.4%) 0.47 NS 1.10 (0.85–1.44) 0.10 NS 1.31 (0.95–1.79) TT 149 (46.0%) 90 (45.7%) 366 (51.3%) 0.11 NS 0.81 (0.62–1.05) 0.14 NS 0.79 (0.58–1.08) rs2780815 G 543 (84.3%) 335 (89.6%) 1250 (87.5%) 0.05 NS 0.77 (0.59–1.00) 0.28 NS 1.22 (0.85–1.77) GG 230 (71.4%) 151 (80.7%) 548 (76.7%) 0.07 NS 0.76 (0.56–1.02) 0.24 NS 1.27 (0.85–1.90) GT 83 (25.8%) 33 (17.6%) 154 (21.6%) 0.14 NS 1.26 (0.93–1.72) 0.23 NS 0.78 (0.51–1.18) TT 9 (2.8%) 3 (1.7%) 12 (1.7%) 0.24 NS 1.68 (0.70–4.03) 0.94 NS 0.95 (0.27–3.42)  JAK2 rs10758669 A 449 (66.2%) 256 (65.3%) 980 (69.0%) 0.20 NS 0.88 (0.72–1.70) 0.16 NS 0.85 (0.67–1.07) AA 139 (41.0%) 81 (41.3%) 346 (48.7%) 0.02 NS 0.73 (0.56–0.95) 0.07 NS 0.74 (0.54–1.02) AC 171 (50.4%) 94 (48.0%) 288 (40.6%) 2.56 × 10−3 0.084 1.49 (1.15–1.94) 0.06 NS 1.35 (0.98–1.86) CC 29 (8.6%) 21 (10.7%) 76 (10.7%) 0.28 NS 0.78 (0.50–1.22) 1.00 NS 1.00 (0.60–1.67) rs10975003 C 165 (25.7%) 86 (22.5%) 272 (21.2%) 0.03 NS 1.29 (1.03–1.61) 0.57 NS 1.08 (0.82–1.43) CC 18 (5.6%) 8 (4.2%) 28 (4.4%) 0.39 NS 1.31 (0.71–2.40) 0.92 NS 0.96 (0.43–2.14) CT 129 (40.2%) 70 (36.6%) 216 (33.5%) 0.04 NS 1.33 (1.01–1.75) 0.44 NS 1.14 (0.82–1.60) TT 174 (54.2%) 113 (59.2%) 399 (62.1%) 0.01 NS 0.72 (0.55–0.95) 0.47 NS 0.89 (0.64–1.23)  STAT1 rs1547550 C 608 (88.1%) 329 (85.7%) 1254 (87.8%) 0.84 NS 1.03 (0.78–1.36) 0.26 NS 0.83 (0.60–1.15) CC 264 (76.5%) 143 (74.5%) 555 (77.7%) 0.66 NS 0.93 (0.69–1.27) 0.34 NS 0.84 (0.58–1.21) CG 80 (23.2%) 43 (22.4%) 144 (20.2%) 0.26 NS 1.20 (0.88–1.63) 0.50 NS 1.14 (0.78–1.68) GG 1 (0.3%) 6 (3.1%) 15 (2.1%) 0.02 NS 0.14 (0.02–103) 0.40 NS 1.50 (0.58–3.93) rs2066802 C 130 (20.7%) 60 (16.8%) 288 (20.7%) 0.99 NS 1.00 (0.79–1.26) 0.09 NS 0.77 (0.57–1.05) CC 11 (3.5%) 4 (2.2%) 27 (3.9%) 0.77 NS 0.90 (0.44–1.83) 0.29 NS 0.57 (0.20–1.64) CT 108 (34.4%) 52 (29.1%) 234 (33.7%) 0.82 NS 1.03 (0.78–1.37) 0.24 NS 0.81 (0.56–1.16) TT 195 (62.1%) 123 (68.7%) 434 (62.4%) 0.92 NS 0.99 (0.75–1.30) 0.12 NS 1.32 (0.93–1.88) rs6718902 C 368 (57.7%) 216 (54.5%) 778 (54.5%) 0.18 NS 1.14 (0.94–1.38) 0.98 NS 1.00 (0.80–1.25) CC 103 (32.3%) 60 (30.3%) 209 (29.3%) 0.33 NS 1.15 (0.87–1.53) 0.78 NS 1.05 (0.75–1.48) CT 162 (50.8%) 96 (48.5%) 360 (50.4%) 0.91 NS 1.02 (0.78–1.32) 0.63 NS 0.93 (0.68–1.27) TT 54 (16.9%) 42 (21.2%) 145 (20.3%) 0.20 NS 0.80 (0.57–1.13) 0.78 NS 1.06 (0.72–1.56) rs10199181 A 170 (26.9%) 100 (27.8%) 397 (27.8%) 0.67 NS 0.96 (0.77–1.18) 0.99 NS 1.00 (0.77–1.29) AA 25 (7.9%) 18 (10.0%) 55 (7.7%) 0.91 NS 1.03 (0.63–1.68) 0.32 NS 1.33 (0.76–2.33) AT 120 (38.0%) 64 (35.6%) 287 (40.2%) 0.50 NS 0.91 (0.69–1.20) 0.26 NS 0.82 (0.58–1.15) TT 171 (54.1%) 98 (54.4%) 372 (52.1%) 0.55 NS 1.08 (0.83–1.41) 0.57 NS 1.10 (0.79–1.53)  IRF1 rs2070721 A 221 (34.9%) 135 (37.3%) 487 (34.1%) 0.73 NS 1.03 (0.85–1.26) 0.25 NS 1.15 (0.90-1.46) AA 37 (11.7%) 24 (13.3%) 74 (10.4%) 0.53 NS 1.14 (0.75–1.74) 0.26 NS 1.32 (0.81–2.16) AC 147 (46.4%) 87 (48.1%) 339 (47.4%) 0.74 NS 0.96 (0.73–1.25) 0.89 NS 1.02 (0.74–1.42) CC 133 (42.0%) 70 (38.6%) 301 (42.2%) 0.95 NS 0.99 (0.76–1.30) 0.40 NS 0.97 (0.62–1.21)  NOS2 rs2297518 A 130 (19.0%) 64 (16.5%) 209 (16.2%) 0.11 NS 1.22 (0.96–1.55) 0.87 NS 1.03 (0.76–1.39) AA 7 (2.0%) 5 (2.6%) 12 (1.9%) 0.83 NS 1.11 (0.43–2.84) 0.53 NS 1.40 (0.49–4.02) AG 116 (33.9%) 54 (27.8%) 185 (28.6%) 0.08 NS 1.28 (0.97–1.70) 0.84 NS 0.96 (0.67–1.38) GG 219 (64.1%) 135 (69.6%) 450 (69.5%) 0.07 NS 0.78 (0.59–1.03) 0.99 NS 1.00 (0.71–1.42) rs4795067 A 512 (73.6%) 295 (74.5%) 1008 (76.1%) 0.20 NS 0.87 (0.71–1.08) 0.61 NS 0.92 (0.71–1.19) AA 184 (52.9%) 109 (55.1%) 382 (57.7%) 0.14 NS 0.82 (0.63–1.07) 0.51 NS 0.90 (0.65–1.24) AG 144 (41.4%) 77 (38.8%) 244 (36.9%) 0.16 NS 1.21 (0.93–1.58) 0.60 NS 1.09 (0.79–1.51) GG 20 (5.7%) 12 (6.1%) 36 (5.4%) 0.84 NS 1.06 (0.60–1.86) 0.74 NS 1.12 (0.57–2.20) OR = odds ratio; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval. Pc =P value adjusted by Bonferroni correction.


### 3.3. Logistic Regression Analysis of SNPs in AAU

We further investigated the SNPs rs10758669 and rs10975003 using additive, codominant, dominant, and recessive genetic models using a multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for age and gender. We observed that the frequency of the CA genotype of rs10758669 was significantly higher in AAU patients, which suggests that patients with the rs10758669 CA genotype have increased susceptibility to AAU (46.8% versus 40.6%,OR=1.28, P=0.02, Supplementary Table S4). An increased frequency of the AC genotype of rs10758669 was also observed in HLA-B27-positive AAU patients and AS-positive AAU patients compared to the healthy controls (49.5% versus 40.6%, OR=1.43, P=3.50×10-3 and 49.2% versus 40.6%, OR=1.36, P=0.02, Supplementary Table S4). For SNP rs10975003, the frequency of the heterozygous CT genotype was significantly higher in female AAU patients compared to the healthy controls (40.4% versus 33.6%, OR=1.57, P=0.01, Supplementary Table S5). A similar result was observed when we combined CT and CC to construct a dominant model (44.3% versus 38.0%, OR=1.57, P=9.10×10-3, Supplementary Table S5). However, none of the observed associations for the two SNPs retained statistical significance after Bonferroni correction (PBonferroni>0.05). Furthermore, no significance associations were found between the other SNPs and AAU, even after stratification by gender, AS, and HLA-B27 status (data not shown).


## 3.1. Clinical Features of AAU Patients

The detailed clinical features and demographic characteristics of the AAU patients are presented in Table2. All 929 AAU patients include 569 (61.2%) males and 360 (38.8%) females. The 714 control subjects consisted of 428 (59.9%) males and 286 (40.1%) females. The average age was 39.8 ± 12.3 in AAU patients and 39.5 ± 10.8 in the controls, respectively. There were no significant differences in age and gender between the cases and controls. In addition, 546 AAU patients (68.9%) were HLA-B27-positive, whereas 246 AAU patients (31.1%) were HLA-B27-negative.Table 2
Clinical characteristics of the investigated subjects.
Clinical features Total Percentage AAU patients 929 100 Mean age ± SD (years) 39.8 ± 12.3 AAU with AS 443 47.7 AAU without AS 486 52.3 AAU male 569 61.2 AAU female 360 38.8 AAU with AS (male) 326 (443 tested) 73.6 AAU with AS (female) 117 (443 tested) 26.4 AAU without AS (male) 243 (486 tested) 50 AAU without AS (female) 243 (486 tested) 50 HLA-B27+ AAU 546 (792 tested) 68.9 HLA-B27+AAU AS+ 348 (428 tested) 81.3 HLA-B27+AAU AS− 198 (364 tested) 54.4 Control 714 100 Mean age ± SD (years) 39.5 ± 10.8 Male 428 59.9 Female 286 40.1


## 3.2. The Genotype and Allele Frequency Distribution of the Tested SNPs in AAU

Eleven SNPs of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway genes (JAK1, JAK2, STAT1, IRF1, andNOS2) were successfully genotyped. There were no significant deviations of HWE in either the cases or controls. We did not observe significant differences in the genotype and allele distributions of any of the SNPs between the AAU patients and control subjects after Bonferroni correction (see Supplementary Table S1 in Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5896906). Further stratified analyses of gender, AS, and HLA-B27 status showed a boundary significant association of two SNPs (rs10975003 and rs10758669) ofJAK2 with AAU. In female AS-positive AAU patients, there was a decreased frequency of the TT genotype of rs10975003 compared to the female controls (OR=0.55; P=1.59×10-3; PBonferroni=0.052, Table 3), whereas no significant differences were observed in the genotype and allele frequencies of the other ten SNPs (PBonferroni>0.05, Table 3). Similarly, there were no significant differences in the genotype and allele frequencies of the SNPs between the male AAU patients and male controls (PBonferroni>0.05, Supplementary Table S2).Table 3
Allele and genotype frequencies in female AAU patients and female controls.
Gene SNP Allele and genotype AAU+AS+ (female) AAU+AS− (female) Controls (female) P (AS+) Pc (AS+) OR (95% CI) P (AS−) Pc (AS−) OR (95% CI) JAK1 rs310241 C 80 (33.3%) 138 (29.6%) 156 (28.7%) 0.19 NS 1.24 (0.90–1.72) 0.74 NS 1.05 (0.80–1.37) CC 12 (10.0%) 14 (6.0%) 17 (6.2%) 0.19 NS 1.67 (0.77–3.61) 0.91 NS 0.96 (0.46–2.00) CT 56 (46.7%) 110 (47.2%) 122 (44.9%) 0.74 NS 1.08 (0.70–1.66) 0.60 NS 1.10 (0.77–1.56) TT 52 (43.3%) 109 (46.8%) 133 (48.9%) 0.31 NS 0.80 (0.52–1.23) 0.64 NS 0.92 (0.65–1.30) rs2780815 G 159 (78.7%) 400 (87.0%) 495 (85.3%) 0.03 NS 0.64 (0.42–0.96) 0.45 NS 1.15 (0.80–1.63) GG 63 (62.4%) 175 (76.1%) 212 (73.1%) 0.04 NS 0.61 (0.38–0.99) 0.44 NS 1.17 (0.79–1.75) GT 33 (32.6%) 50 (21.7%) 71 (24.5%) 0.11 NS 1.50 (0.91–2.45) 0.46 NS 0.86 (0.57–1.29) TT 5 (5.0%) 5 (2.2%) 7 (2.4%) 0.20 NS 2.11 (0.65–6.80) 0.86 NS 0.90 (0.28–2.87)  JAK2 rs10758669 A 170 (73.9%) 328 (67.5%) 399 (72.3%) 0.64 NS 1.09 (0.77–1.54) 0.10 NS 0.80 (0.61–1.04) AA 59 (51.3%) 104 (42.8%) 144 (52.2%) 0.88 NS 0.97 (0.63–1.49) 0.03 NS 0.69 (0.49–1.00) AC 52 (45.2%) 120 (49.4%) 111 (40.2%) 0.36 NS 1.23 (0.79–1.90) 0.04 NS 1.45 (1.02–2.05) CC 4 (3.5%) 19 (7.8%) 21 (7.6%) 0.13 NS 0.44 (0.15–1.30) 0.93 NS 1.03 (0.54–1.97) rs10975003 C 44 (20.6%) 117 (25.8%) 93 (17.9%) 0.40 NS 1.19 (0.80–1.77) 2.83 × 10−3 0.09 1.59 (1.17–2.17) CC 2 (1.9%) 11 (4.8%) 8 (3.1%) 0.52 NS 0.60 (0.13–2.87) 0.32 NS 1.60 (0.63–4.06) CT 40 (37.4%) 95 (41.9%) 77 (29.6%) 0.15 NS 1.42 (0.88–2.28) 4.83 × 10−3 NS 1.71 (1.18–2.49) TT 65 (60.7%) 121 (53.3%) 175 (67.3%) 0.23 NS 0.75 (0.47–1.20) 1.59 × 10−3 0.052 0.55 (0.38–0.80)  STAT1 rs1547550 C 205 (86.9%) 411 (88.6%) 423 (87.0%) 0.95 NS 0.99 (0.62–1.56) 0.47 NS 1.16 (0.78–1.71) CC 88 (74.6%) 182 (78.4%) 185 (76.1%) 0.75 NS 0.92 (0.55–1.53) 0.55 NS 1.14 (0.74–1.75) CG 29 (24.6%) 47 (20.3%) 53 (21.8%) 0.56 NS 1.17 (0.70–1.96) 0.68 NS 0.91 (0.59–1.42) GG 1 (0.8%) 3 (1.3%) 5 (2.1%) 0.40 NS 0.41 (0.05–3.52) 0.56 NS 0.65 (0.15–2.76) rs2066802 C 46 (20.4%) 81 (17.4%) 113 (21.2%) 0.80 NS 0.95 (0.65–1.40) 0.13 NS 0.78 (0.57–1.08) CC 1 (0.9%) 6 (2.6%) 8 (3.0%) 0.22 NS 0.29 (0.04–2.34) 0.78 NS 0.86 (0.29–2.50) CT 44 (38.9%) 69 (29.6%) 97 (36.3%) 0.63 NS 1.12 (0.71–1.76) 0.11 NS 0.74 (0.51–1.07) TT 68 (60.2%) 158 (67.8%) 162 (60.7%) 0.93 NS 0.98 (0.63–1.54) 0.10 NS 1.37 (0.95–1.97) rs6718902 C 132 (60.0%) 259 (54.2%) 308 (53.8%) 0.12 NS 1.29 (0.94–1.76) 0.91 NS 1.01 (0.79–1.29) CC 36 (32.7%) 72 (30.1%) 82 (28.7%) 0.43 NS 1.21 (0.75–1.94) 0.72 NS 1.07 (0.74–1.56) CT 60 (54.5%) 115 (48.1%) 144 (50.3%) 0.45 NS 1.18 (0.76–1.84) 0.61 NS 0.92 (0.65–1.29) TT 14 (12.7%) 52 (21.8%) 60 (21.0%) 0.06 NS 0.55 (0.29–1.03) 0.83 NS 1.05 (0.69–1.59) rs10199181 A 51 (24.8%) 117 (26.1%) 148 (25.2%) 0.91 NS 0.98 (0.68–1.41) 0.73 NS 1.05 (0.79–1.39) AA 6 (5.8%) 20 (8.9%) 19 (6.5%) 0.82 NS 0.90 (0.35–2.31) 0.29 NS 1.42 (0.74–2.73) AT 39 (37.9%) 77 (34.4%) 110 (37.4%) 0.94 NS 1.02 (0.64–1.62) 0.48 NS 0.88 (0.61–1.26) TT 58 (56.3%) 127 (56.7%) 165 (56.1%) 0.97 NS 1.01 (0.64–1.58) 0.90 NS 1.02 (0.72–1.45)  IRF1 rs2070721 A 86 (40.6%) 154 (33.9%) 216 (34.3%) 0.10 NS 1.31 (0.95–1.80) 0.90 NS 0.98 (0.76–1.27) AA 15 (14.2%) 26 (11.5%) 29 (9.2%) 0.15 NS 1.63 (0.84–3.17) 0.39 NS 1.28 (0.73–2.23) AC 56 (52.8%) 102 (44.9%) 158 (50.2%) 0.63 NS 1.11 (0.72–1.73) 0.23 NS 0.81 (0.58–1.14) CC 35 (33.0%) 99 (43.6%) 128 (40.6%) 0.16 NS 0.72 (0.45–1.14) 0.49 NS 1.13 (0.80–1.60)  NOS2 rs2297518 A 52 (20.5%) 69 (15.2%) 74 (15.7%) 0.10 NS 1.39 (0.94–2.05) 0.84 NS 0.96 (0.68–1.38) AA 3 (2.4%) 6 (2.6%) 2 (0.8%) 0.24 NS 2.83 (0.47–17.17) 0.14 NS 3.18 (0.63–15.90) AG 46 (36.2%) 57 (25.2%) 70 (29.7%) 0.20 NS 1.35 (0.85–2.13) 0.27 NS 0.80 (0.53–1.20) GG 78 (61.4%) 164 (72.2%) 164 (69.5%) 0.12 NS 0.70 (0.45–1.10) 0.51 NS 1.14 (0.77–1.71) rs4795067 A 173 (73.9%) 369 (75.9%) 439 (77.8%) 0.24 NS 0.81 (0.57–1.15) 0.46 NS 0.90 (0.67–1.20) AA 62 (53.0%) 145 (59.7%) 169 (59.9%) 0.20 NS 0.75 (0.49–1.16) 0.95 NS 0.99 (0.70–1.40) AG 49 (41.9%) 79 (32.5%) 101 (35.8%) 0.26 NS 1.29 (0.83–2.01) 0.43 NS 0.86 (0.60–1.24) GG 6 (5.1%) 19 (7.8%) 12 (4.3%) 0.70 NS 1.22 (0.45–3.32) 0.08 NS 1.91 (0.91–4.02) OR = odds ratio; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval. Pc =P value adjusted by Bonferroni correction.In addition, an increased frequency of the AC genotype in rs10758669 was observed in HLA-B27-positive AAU patients compared to the healthy controls (OR=1.44; P=1.62×10-3; PBonferroni=0.053, Table 4), whereas there were no significant differences in the genotype and allele frequencies of the other ten SNPs between the HLA-B27-positive AAU patients and the control subjects (PBonferroni>0.05, Table 4).Table 4
Allele and genotype frequencies of SNPs in patients with AAU versus control subjects stratified by HLA-B27 status.
Gene SNP Allele and genotype AAUHLA-B27 Control P Pc OR (95% CI) JAK1 rs310241 C 324 (31.0%) 392 (27.5%) 0.06 NS 1.18 (1.00–1.41) CC 41 (7.9%) 45 (6.3%) 0.29 NS 1.27 (0.82–1.96) CT 242 (46.4%) 302 (42.4%) 0.16 NS 1.18 (0.94–1.48) TT 239 (45.7%) 366 (51.3%) 0.05 NS 0.80 (0.64–1.00) rs2780815 G 878 (86.2%) 1250 (87.5%) 0.35 NS 0.89 (0.70–1.13) GG 381 (74.8%) 548 (76.7%) 0.44 NS 0.90 (0.69–1.18) GT 116 (22.8%) 154 (21.6%) 0.61 NS 1.07 (0.82–1.41) TT 12 (2.4%) 12 (1.7%) 0.40 NS 1.41 (0.63–3.17)  JAK2 rs10758669 A 705 (65.9%) 980 (69.0%) 0.10 NS 0.87 (0.73–1.03) AA 220 (41.1%) 346 (48.7%) 0.08 NS 0.74 (0.59–0.92) AC 265 (49.5%) 288 (40.6%) 1.62 × 10−3 0.053 1.44 (1.15–1.80) CC 50 (9.4%) 76 (10.7%) 0.43 NS 0.86 (0.59–1.25) rs10975003 C 251 (24.5%) 272 (21.2%) 0.05 NS 1.21 (1.00–1.47) CC 26 (5.1%) 28 (4.4%) 0.56 NS 1.18 (0.68–2.03) CT 199 (38.8%) 216 (33.5%) 0.06 NS 1.26 (0.99–1.60) TT 287 (56.1%) 399 (62.1%) 0.03 NS 0.77 (0.61–0.98)  STAT1 rs1547550 C 937 (87.2%) 1254 (87.8%) 0.67 NS 0.95 (0.75–1.21) CC 407 (75.8%) 555 (77.7%) 0.42 NS 0.90 (0.69–1.17) CG 123 (22.9%) 144 (20.2%) 0.24 NS 1.18 (0.90–1.54) GG 7 (1.3%) 15 (2.1%) 0.29 NS 0.62 (0.25–1.52) rs2066802 C 190 (19.3%) 288 (20.7%) 0.39 NS 0.91 (0.74–1.12) CC 15 (3.0%) 27 (3.9%) 0.44 NS 0.78 (0.41–1.48) CT 160 (32.5%) 234 (33.7%) 0.66 NS 0.95 (0.74–1.21) TT 318 (64.5%) 434 (62.4%) 0.47 NS 1.09 (0.86–1.39) rs6718902 C 584 (56.5%) 778 (54.5%) 0.33 NS 1.08 (0.92–1.27) CC 163 (31.5%) 209 (29.3%) 0.40 NS 1.11 (0.87–1.42) CT 258 (49.9%) 360 (50.4%) 0.86 NS 0.98 (0.78–1.23) TT 96 (18.6%) 145 (20.3%) 0.45 NS 0.90 (0.67–1.19) rs10199181 A 270 (27.2%) 397 (27.8%) 0.75 NS 0.97 (0.81–1.16) AA 43 (8.7%) 55 (7.7%) 0.55 NS 1.14 (0.75–1.73) AT 184 (37.1%) 287 (40.2%) 0.28 NS 0.88 (0.69–1.11) TT 269 (54.2%) 372 (52.1%) 0.47 NS 1.09 (0.87–1.37)  IRF1 rs2070721 A 356 (35.7%) 487 (34.1%) 0.40 NS 1.08(0.91–1.27) AA 61 (12.2%) 74 (10.4%) 0.30 NS 1.21 (0.84–1.73) AC 234 (47.0%) 339 (47.4%) 0.87 NS 0.98 (0.78–1.23) CC 203 (40.8%) 301 (42.2%) 0.63 NS 0.94 (0.75–1.19)  NOS2 rs2297518 A 194 (18.1%) 209 (16.2%) 0.21 NS 1.15 (0.93–1.42) AA 12 (2.3%) 12 (1.9%) 0.64 NS 1.21 (0.54–2.72) AG 170 (31.7%) 185 (28.6%) 0.24 NS 1.16 (0.90–1.49) GG 354 (66.0%) 450 (69.5%) 0.20 NS 0.85 (0.67–1.09) rs4795067 A 797 (74.3%) 1008 (76.1%) 0.35 NS 0.92 (0.76–1.10) AA 293 (54.6%) 382 (57.7%) 0.33 NS 0.89 (0.71–1.23) AG 211 (39.4%) 244 (36.9%) 0.37 NS 1.11 (0.88–1.41) GG 32 (6.0%) 36 (5.4%) 0.69 NS 1.10 (0.68–1.80) OR = odds ratio; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval. Pc =P value adjusted by Bonferroni correction.However, an increased frequency of the rs10758669/AC genotype was observed in HLA-B27-positive AS-positive AAU patients compared to healthy controls (OR=1.49; P=2.56×10-3; PBonferroni=0.084, Table 5), whereas no significant differences in the genotype and allele frequencies of the other 10 SNPs were observed between the HLA-B27-positive AS-positive AAU patients and healthy controls (PBonferroni>0.05, Table 5). In addition, there were no significant differences in the genotype and allele frequencies of the tested SNPs between the AS-positive AAU patients and control subjects (PBonferroni>0.05, Supplementary Table S3).Table 5
Allele and genotype frequencies of SNPs in patients with AAU versus control subjects stratified by AS and HLA-B27 status.
Gene SNP Allele and genotype AAU+AS+ HLA-B27 AAU+AS− HLA-B27 Control P (AS+) Pc (AS+) OR (95% CI) P (AS-) Pc (AS−) OR (95% CI) JAK1 rs310241 C 205 (31.6%) 119 (29.9%) 392 (27.5%) 0.05 NS 1.22 (1.00–1.49) 0.32 NS 1.13 (0.88–1.45) CC 30 (9.3%) 11 (5.5%) 45 (6.3%) 0.09 NS 1.52 (0.94–2.45) 0.70 NS 0.87 (0.44–1.72) CT 145 (44.7%) 97 (48.7%) 302 (42.4%) 0.47 NS 1.10 (0.85–1.44) 0.10 NS 1.31 (0.95–1.79) TT 149 (46.0%) 90 (45.7%) 366 (51.3%) 0.11 NS 0.81 (0.62–1.05) 0.14 NS 0.79 (0.58–1.08) rs2780815 G 543 (84.3%) 335 (89.6%) 1250 (87.5%) 0.05 NS 0.77 (0.59–1.00) 0.28 NS 1.22 (0.85–1.77) GG 230 (71.4%) 151 (80.7%) 548 (76.7%) 0.07 NS 0.76 (0.56–1.02) 0.24 NS 1.27 (0.85–1.90) GT 83 (25.8%) 33 (17.6%) 154 (21.6%) 0.14 NS 1.26 (0.93–1.72) 0.23 NS 0.78 (0.51–1.18) TT 9 (2.8%) 3 (1.7%) 12 (1.7%) 0.24 NS 1.68 (0.70–4.03) 0.94 NS 0.95 (0.27–3.42)  JAK2 rs10758669 A 449 (66.2%) 256 (65.3%) 980 (69.0%) 0.20 NS 0.88 (0.72–1.70) 0.16 NS 0.85 (0.67–1.07) AA 139 (41.0%) 81 (41.3%) 346 (48.7%) 0.02 NS 0.73 (0.56–0.95) 0.07 NS 0.74 (0.54–1.02) AC 171 (50.4%) 94 (48.0%) 288 (40.6%) 2.56 × 10−3 0.084 1.49 (1.15–1.94) 0.06 NS 1.35 (0.98–1.86) CC 29 (8.6%) 21 (10.7%) 76 (10.7%) 0.28 NS 0.78 (0.50–1.22) 1.00 NS 1.00 (0.60–1.67) rs10975003 C 165 (25.7%) 86 (22.5%) 272 (21.2%) 0.03 NS 1.29 (1.03–1.61) 0.57 NS 1.08 (0.82–1.43) CC 18 (5.6%) 8 (4.2%) 28 (4.4%) 0.39 NS 1.31 (0.71–2.40) 0.92 NS 0.96 (0.43–2.14) CT 129 (40.2%) 70 (36.6%) 216 (33.5%) 0.04 NS 1.33 (1.01–1.75) 0.44 NS 1.14 (0.82–1.60) TT 174 (54.2%) 113 (59.2%) 399 (62.1%) 0.01 NS 0.72 (0.55–0.95) 0.47 NS 0.89 (0.64–1.23)  STAT1 rs1547550 C 608 (88.1%) 329 (85.7%) 1254 (87.8%) 0.84 NS 1.03 (0.78–1.36) 0.26 NS 0.83 (0.60–1.15) CC 264 (76.5%) 143 (74.5%) 555 (77.7%) 0.66 NS 0.93 (0.69–1.27) 0.34 NS 0.84 (0.58–1.21) CG 80 (23.2%) 43 (22.4%) 144 (20.2%) 0.26 NS 1.20 (0.88–1.63) 0.50 NS 1.14 (0.78–1.68) GG 1 (0.3%) 6 (3.1%) 15 (2.1%) 0.02 NS 0.14 (0.02–103) 0.40 NS 1.50 (0.58–3.93) rs2066802 C 130 (20.7%) 60 (16.8%) 288 (20.7%) 0.99 NS 1.00 (0.79–1.26) 0.09 NS 0.77 (0.57–1.05) CC 11 (3.5%) 4 (2.2%) 27 (3.9%) 0.77 NS 0.90 (0.44–1.83) 0.29 NS 0.57 (0.20–1.64) CT 108 (34.4%) 52 (29.1%) 234 (33.7%) 0.82 NS 1.03 (0.78–1.37) 0.24 NS 0.81 (0.56–1.16) TT 195 (62.1%) 123 (68.7%) 434 (62.4%) 0.92 NS 0.99 (0.75–1.30) 0.12 NS 1.32 (0.93–1.88) rs6718902 C 368 (57.7%) 216 (54.5%) 778 (54.5%) 0.18 NS 1.14 (0.94–1.38) 0.98 NS 1.00 (0.80–1.25) CC 103 (32.3%) 60 (30.3%) 209 (29.3%) 0.33 NS 1.15 (0.87–1.53) 0.78 NS 1.05 (0.75–1.48) CT 162 (50.8%) 96 (48.5%) 360 (50.4%) 0.91 NS 1.02 (0.78–1.32) 0.63 NS 0.93 (0.68–1.27) TT 54 (16.9%) 42 (21.2%) 145 (20.3%) 0.20 NS 0.80 (0.57–1.13) 0.78 NS 1.06 (0.72–1.56) rs10199181 A 170 (26.9%) 100 (27.8%) 397 (27.8%) 0.67 NS 0.96 (0.77–1.18) 0.99 NS 1.00 (0.77–1.29) AA 25 (7.9%) 18 (10.0%) 55 (7.7%) 0.91 NS 1.03 (0.63–1.68) 0.32 NS 1.33 (0.76–2.33) AT 120 (38.0%) 64 (35.6%) 287 (40.2%) 0.50 NS 0.91 (0.69–1.20) 0.26 NS 0.82 (0.58–1.15) TT 171 (54.1%) 98 (54.4%) 372 (52.1%) 0.55 NS 1.08 (0.83–1.41) 0.57 NS 1.10 (0.79–1.53)  IRF1 rs2070721 A 221 (34.9%) 135 (37.3%) 487 (34.1%) 0.73 NS 1.03 (0.85–1.26) 0.25 NS 1.15 (0.90-1.46) AA 37 (11.7%) 24 (13.3%) 74 (10.4%) 0.53 NS 1.14 (0.75–1.74) 0.26 NS 1.32 (0.81–2.16) AC 147 (46.4%) 87 (48.1%) 339 (47.4%) 0.74 NS 0.96 (0.73–1.25) 0.89 NS 1.02 (0.74–1.42) CC 133 (42.0%) 70 (38.6%) 301 (42.2%) 0.95 NS 0.99 (0.76–1.30) 0.40 NS 0.97 (0.62–1.21)  NOS2 rs2297518 A 130 (19.0%) 64 (16.5%) 209 (16.2%) 0.11 NS 1.22 (0.96–1.55) 0.87 NS 1.03 (0.76–1.39) AA 7 (2.0%) 5 (2.6%) 12 (1.9%) 0.83 NS 1.11 (0.43–2.84) 0.53 NS 1.40 (0.49–4.02) AG 116 (33.9%) 54 (27.8%) 185 (28.6%) 0.08 NS 1.28 (0.97–1.70) 0.84 NS 0.96 (0.67–1.38) GG 219 (64.1%) 135 (69.6%) 450 (69.5%) 0.07 NS 0.78 (0.59–1.03) 0.99 NS 1.00 (0.71–1.42) rs4795067 A 512 (73.6%) 295 (74.5%) 1008 (76.1%) 0.20 NS 0.87 (0.71–1.08) 0.61 NS 0.92 (0.71–1.19) AA 184 (52.9%) 109 (55.1%) 382 (57.7%) 0.14 NS 0.82 (0.63–1.07) 0.51 NS 0.90 (0.65–1.24) AG 144 (41.4%) 77 (38.8%) 244 (36.9%) 0.16 NS 1.21 (0.93–1.58) 0.60 NS 1.09 (0.79–1.51) GG 20 (5.7%) 12 (6.1%) 36 (5.4%) 0.84 NS 1.06 (0.60–1.86) 0.74 NS 1.12 (0.57–2.20) OR = odds ratio; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval. Pc =P value adjusted by Bonferroni correction.


## 3.3. Logistic Regression Analysis of SNPs in AAU

We further investigated the SNPs rs10758669 and rs10975003 using additive, codominant, dominant, and recessive genetic models using a multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for age and gender. We observed that the frequency of the CA genotype of rs10758669 was significantly higher in AAU patients, which suggests that patients with the rs10758669 CA genotype have increased susceptibility to AAU (46.8% versus 40.6%,OR=1.28, P=0.02, Supplementary Table S4). An increased frequency of the AC genotype of rs10758669 was also observed in HLA-B27-positive AAU patients and AS-positive AAU patients compared to the healthy controls (49.5% versus 40.6%, OR=1.43, P=3.50×10-3 and 49.2% versus 40.6%, OR=1.36, P=0.02, Supplementary Table S4). For SNP rs10975003, the frequency of the heterozygous CT genotype was significantly higher in female AAU patients compared to the healthy controls (40.4% versus 33.6%, OR=1.57, P=0.01, Supplementary Table S5). A similar result was observed when we combined CT and CC to construct a dominant model (44.3% versus 38.0%, OR=1.57, P=9.10×10-3, Supplementary Table S5). However, none of the observed associations for the two SNPs retained statistical significance after Bonferroni correction (PBonferroni>0.05). Furthermore, no significance associations were found between the other SNPs and AAU, even after stratification by gender, AS, and HLA-B27 status (data not shown).


## 4. Discussion

In this study, we first investigated whether genetic polymorphisms of JAK-STAT signaling pathway genes, includingJAK1, JAK2, STAT1, IRF1, andNOS2, confer susceptibility to AAU with or without AS in a Chinese Han population. Our results suggest that none of these SNPs exhibit statistically different frequencies of genotypes and alleles between healthy controls and AAU patients. However, we observed a boundary significant association for two SNPs (rs10975003 and rs10758669) ofJAK2 by stratification analysis by gender and HLA-B27 status.We highlighted two issues at the time of study design to obtain unbiased association results. First, we followed strict criteria for the diagnosis of AAU patients. Patients with AAU were diagnosed as previously described by Jabs et al. [36] and patients with AS were diagnosed with the modified New York Criteria [37]. In addition, the AAU patients and healthy controls were strictly matched by ethnicity and age to avoid a possible influence of population stratification. Furthermore, we only enrolled controls who had detailed histories and physical examinations and excluded controls with any autoimmune or immune-related diseases. Finally, 20% of the samples were randomly chosen and analyzed by direct sequencing, and the results of different genotyping methods were consistent.AAU is defined as inflammation confined to the anterior segment of the eye that involves the iris and anterior part of the ciliary body. The HLA-B27 is considered to be strongly associated with both AAU and AS [5, 8, 10, 14]. Recent genetic studies have revealed that five candidate genes in the JAK-STAT signaling pathway were considered genetic predisposing factors for different autoimmune-mediated diseases [38–45]. SNPs (rs10758669 and 10975003) inJAK2 are considered susceptibility factors for Crohn’s disease (CD) in the German population and ulcerative colitis (UC) in the Korean population [38, 45]. One SNP (rs2070721) inIRF1 and SNPs (rs2297518 and rs4795067) inNOS2are also associated with autoimmune diseases, such as multiple sclerosis (MS) in Italy, AS in Europe, and psoriasis in Pakistan [39, 43, 44]. Four SNPs (rs6718902, rs10199181, rs2066802, and rs1547550) in theSTAT1 gene were observed to be associated with MS in Italy and IgA nephropathy (IgAN) in Korea [39, 40]. In addition, an association was found between SNPs (rs2780815, rs310241, rs3790532, rs310230, and rs310236) inJAK1 and Behçet disease (BD) as well as Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) syndrome [41, 42], two other common uveitis entities in China. There has been no report of associations between JAK-STAT signaling pathway genes and AAU, and thus we performed this case-control study to detect whether the five candidate genes were associated with AAU in a Chinese Han population. Our results showed that there were no significant associations between the genetic polymorphisms of the five candidate genes in the JAK-STAT signaling pathway and AAU. These results are not consistent with those observed for other autoimmune diseases reported in German, European, and some other Asian populations [38, 43, 45]. This discrepancy may be attributable to differences in the etiology and pathogenesis of AAU compared with BD, VKH syndrome, and autoimmune-mediated diseases.Consistent with our results, a recent study also reported no significant association of JAK-STAT signaling pathway gene polymorphisms with rheumatoid arthritis stratified by the presence/absence of cardiovascular disease [46]. Conversely, an influence of NFKB1 signaling pathway polymorphisms on the development of cardiovascular events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis has been observed [47]. Furthermore, NFKB1 signaling pathway polymorphisms have been described to play a critical role in the development of many autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, and thus the evaluation of the potential relationships betweenNFKB1 polymorphisms and the development of AAU could be a promising research line for the future.There were several limitations of our study. We had a limited sample size to detect SNPs with weak effects while considering multiple corrections. Even for SNPs rs10758669 and rs10975003, we only had 70.0% power using a genetic power calculator [48]. In addition, our samples were restricted to the Han Chinese population, and all patients were enrolled from the ophthalmology department. Further studies with a larger sample size and other ethnic populations as well as patients enrolled from multiple sources are warranted to confirm our findings. Additionally, we only focused on eleven SNPs in the JAK-STAT pathway, and it is possible that other unknown SNPs might be associated with AAU risk.In conclusion, this study reveals that genetic polymorphisms of JAK-STAT pathway genes, includingJAK1, JAK2, STAT1, IRF1, andNOS2, may not be involved in susceptibility to AAU risk in the Han Chinese population.



---

*Source: 5896906-2016-11-14.xml*