# Tree Species Composition and Regeneration Status of Shitalpur Forest Beat under Chittagong North Forest Division, Bangladesh

Authors: Asadozzaman Nur; Rajasree Nandi; Mohammed Jashimuddin; Mohammed Akhter Hossain
Journal: Advances in Ecology
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

Biodiversity erosion particularly in developing countries is a matter of great concern to the global ecological community. Species composition and regeneration indicate the health of forest. This study explored tree species composition and regeneration of natural hill forest of Shitalpur under Chittagong North Forest Division through 27 sample plots of 20 m × 20 m for trees and 2 m × 2 m for regeneration. A total of 47 tree species belonging to 29 families and 17 regenerating species belonging to 15 families were recorded. The tree stem density, basal area, and wood volume were 0.49 m2/ha, 1425 stem/ha, and 189.9 m3/ha, respectively. Mean regeneration was significantly higher in bottom hill (14374 seedlings/ha) compared to top hill (9671 seedlings/ha).Toona ciliata was highest (4444 seedlings/ha) at the bottom hill compared to other hill positions. The result shows that only 36% of the tree species (17 out of 47) are regenerating in the study area, meaning majority of the tree species (64%) are not getting favorable conditions to regenerate. This might be due to absence of mature tree species as a result of overexploitation by local people. The findings may help in monitoring the species composition changes over time and adopting specific conservation programs for Shitalpur Forest.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The total area of Bangladesh is 14,757 million hectares, of which forest lands account for almost 17.5% (2.53 million ha). The total forest land includes classified and unclassified state lands, homestead forests, and tea and rubber gardens. Bangladesh has a rich biological heritage containing about 5700 species of angiosperms [1]. During last few decades, the whole natural forest structure of Bangladesh was negatively changed by both biotic and abiotic disturbances which ultimately affect the regeneration and population dynamics [2, 3]. Many forces are responsible for forest degradation, collectively and individually. The trend of these forces is very complex. The major causes of forest degradation in Bangladesh are agricultural expansion, overextraction of wood and nonwood resources, infrastructure development, population growth, deforestation, settlement, urbanization, and inappropriate management practices [4–6]. The rapid loss and degradation of forests in Bangladesh have brought about an alarming rate of forest biodiversity depletion [1, 7]. Many plant and animal species widely distributed in the past have either become extinct or can only be found in some localized areas at very low population densities.Forestry is an important sector in Bangladesh’s economy, which contributes about 1.28% of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) [8]. The Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) in Bangladesh supports almost 80% of the country’s total biodiversity [9] and is inhibited by people from 12 ethnic groups [10–16] who depend largely on forest commons to fulfill their basic subsistence requirements and cash income [10, 12, 17]. The wide variety of plants and animals of the hill forests has supported the livelihoods of the hill people including dwelling, food, clothing, health care, and festivals. For many centuries, the indigenous communities have managed the forests in a sustainable manner by keeping the rotation of their shifting cultivation long enough (15–20 years) [17, 18]. Population pressure, overcropping, soil erosion, indiscriminate illegal logging in forest areas, lack of suitable land, shifting cultivation with shortened fallow period (3-4 years) [7, 15, 17–20] result in falling yields and drastic loss of forest coverage leading to land degradation [21]. Several studies were carried out in the recent years to investigate the plant diversity and community structure status in Sitapahar reserve forest of Chittagong Hill Tracts (South) Forest Division, Chunati Wildlife Sanctuary, Ukhiya natural forests of Cox’s-Bazar Forest Division, and Bamu reserve forests of Cox’s Bazar. But information on species composition in Shitalpur Forest Beat was not available previously. Moreover, information on floristic composition and their quantitative structure and diversity is vital for understanding the functioning and dynamics of forest ecosystems [22]. Therefore, the main objective of the study was to investigate the vegetative composition and species diversity and also the status of natural regeneration on different hill slopes in Shitalpur Forest Beat under Kumira Range in Chittagong North Forest Division.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Selection of the Study Area

The study was conducted at Shitalpur Forest Beat under Kumira Range of Chittagong North Forest Division. It is situated at the northwestern part of Chittagong district, between 22°27′31′′N and 22°27′31′′N latitude and 91°47′02′′ and 91°46′07′′E longitude. The total area of the beat was 1962 hectares of which 41% comprised protected forest and 37% vested forest and the remaining other forest. A small area of around 100 ha under Shitalpur Forest Beat situated adjacent to western boundary of Chittagong University campus was first selected for this study. Topographically, the study area comprised mostly hills and valleys. The total area sampled under this study was 1.08 hectares.The study was based on primary data collection regarding the systematic survey on the status, structure, composition, and diversity of trees of the study area and the effects of topography on natural regeneration. Necessary information was collected through extensive field observation of the area. The study was based on field data collection through physical measurement in the field and review of relevant literature on similar previous studies based on species composition in Chittagong and Chittagong Hill Tracts. The following steps had been followed for the preparation of this paper.


### 2.2. Data Collection and Analysis

At first a reconnaissance survey was conducted to become familiar with the study sites and the relevant information was collected from Nondonkanon, Chittagong Range office, and Shitalpur Beat Office. To have an idea of species composition of the whole study area, a number of field visits were conducted at the advent of the field work. Two transect walks (one from North to South and other from East to West) across the study area was made with the help of Field Assistant as per [7]. The aim of the walk was to be familiar with the vegetation in order to get a general idea of the site, topography, species composition, and natural regeneration of the study area.The Shannon-Wiener index [23] and Simpson’s index [24] were used as diversity indices. Statistical package SPSS 13.0 was used to conduct the statistical analysis under this study. The basal area per tree and volume per tree were calculated by the formula given by Chaturvedi and Khanna [25]:(1)Basal  area  per  tree=3.14×D24,where D is diameter at breast height in meter;(2)VolumeV=Basal  area×H,where H is total height in meter.Then, from the basal area and volume of individual tree, total basal area of each species was calculated and then converted to the basal area per hectare and volume per hectare for each species.


### 2.3. Sampling Design

The sample plots were selected by purposive sampling method. At first, three hills situating at a distance of about 500 m from each other were selected intentionally from the study area. In each of the selected hills, 9 sample plots (3 plots on each topography,namely, top hill, middle hill, and bottom hill; about 100 m apart from each other) of sizes 20 m× 20 m were demarcated for final study. In this way, a total of 27 sample plots were demarcated for data collection. For regeneration study, 2 m×2 m subplots were taken at the corner point of each of the 27 sample plots and thus a total of 108 regeneration subplots were studied from the study area. All the sample plots and subplots were well demarcated, their corners were marked with pegs, and then all the tree species including seedlings and saplings in each plot were identified and recorded.


## 2.1. Selection of the Study Area

The study was conducted at Shitalpur Forest Beat under Kumira Range of Chittagong North Forest Division. It is situated at the northwestern part of Chittagong district, between 22°27′31′′N and 22°27′31′′N latitude and 91°47′02′′ and 91°46′07′′E longitude. The total area of the beat was 1962 hectares of which 41% comprised protected forest and 37% vested forest and the remaining other forest. A small area of around 100 ha under Shitalpur Forest Beat situated adjacent to western boundary of Chittagong University campus was first selected for this study. Topographically, the study area comprised mostly hills and valleys. The total area sampled under this study was 1.08 hectares.The study was based on primary data collection regarding the systematic survey on the status, structure, composition, and diversity of trees of the study area and the effects of topography on natural regeneration. Necessary information was collected through extensive field observation of the area. The study was based on field data collection through physical measurement in the field and review of relevant literature on similar previous studies based on species composition in Chittagong and Chittagong Hill Tracts. The following steps had been followed for the preparation of this paper.


## 2.2. Data Collection and Analysis

At first a reconnaissance survey was conducted to become familiar with the study sites and the relevant information was collected from Nondonkanon, Chittagong Range office, and Shitalpur Beat Office. To have an idea of species composition of the whole study area, a number of field visits were conducted at the advent of the field work. Two transect walks (one from North to South and other from East to West) across the study area was made with the help of Field Assistant as per [7]. The aim of the walk was to be familiar with the vegetation in order to get a general idea of the site, topography, species composition, and natural regeneration of the study area.The Shannon-Wiener index [23] and Simpson’s index [24] were used as diversity indices. Statistical package SPSS 13.0 was used to conduct the statistical analysis under this study. The basal area per tree and volume per tree were calculated by the formula given by Chaturvedi and Khanna [25]:(1)Basal  area  per  tree=3.14×D24,where D is diameter at breast height in meter;(2)VolumeV=Basal  area×H,where H is total height in meter.Then, from the basal area and volume of individual tree, total basal area of each species was calculated and then converted to the basal area per hectare and volume per hectare for each species.


## 2.3. Sampling Design

The sample plots were selected by purposive sampling method. At first, three hills situating at a distance of about 500 m from each other were selected intentionally from the study area. In each of the selected hills, 9 sample plots (3 plots on each topography,namely, top hill, middle hill, and bottom hill; about 100 m apart from each other) of sizes 20 m× 20 m were demarcated for final study. In this way, a total of 27 sample plots were demarcated for data collection. For regeneration study, 2 m×2 m subplots were taken at the corner point of each of the 27 sample plots and thus a total of 108 regeneration subplots were studied from the study area. All the sample plots and subplots were well demarcated, their corners were marked with pegs, and then all the tree species including seedlings and saplings in each plot were identified and recorded.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Tree Species Composition

In the study area, a total of 47 different tree species comprising 29 families were recorded. Among the families, Moraceae (5 species) comprises the highest number of species followed by Apocynaceae (3 species), Euphorbiaceae (3 species), Leguminosae (3 species), and Verbenaceae (3 species) and the rest of the families comprise one or two species (Table1).Table 1
List of tree species with their families and stems/ha in the study area.
Sl. number Name of family Scientific name 1 Anacardiaceae Lannea coromandelica Spondias pinnata  2 Apocynaceae Brownlowia elata Alstonia scholaris Holarrhena antidysenterica  3 Bignoniaceae Stereospermum chelonoides  4 Bombacaceae Bombax ceiba  5 Burseraceae Bursera serrata  6 Caesalpiniaceae Cassia fistula  7 Combretaceae Terminalia bellirica Terminalia catappa  8 Cycadaceae Cycas pectinata  9 Dilleniaceae Dillenia pentagyna Dillenia indica  10 Ebenaceae Diospyros toposia  11 Euphorbiaceae Macaranga denticulata Aporusa oblonga Phyllanthus emblica  12 Fabaceae Erythrina stricta Derris robusta  13 Fagaceae Castanopsis tribuloides  14 Flacourtiaceae Flacourtia jangomas  15 Lauraceae Beilschmiedia Pseudomicrocarpa Litsea monopetala  16 Leguminosae Albizia procera Erythrina variegate Albizia chinensis  17 Lythraceae Lagerstroemia speciosa  18 Meliaceae Toona ciliata  19 Moraceae Ficus hispida Ficus pyriformis Ficus racemosa Artocarpus lacucha Artocarpus chaplasha  20 Musaceae Musa textiles  21 Myrtaceae Syzygium fruticosum  22 Papilionaceae Derris trifoliate  23 Rutaceae Feronia limonia  24 Sapindaceae Erioglossum edule  25 Sterculiaceae Abroma augusta Pterospermum canescens  26 Tiliaceae Microcos paniculata  27 Vaticeae Vitis glabrata  28 Verbenaceae Callicarpa macrophylla Vitex peduncularis Gmelina arborea  29 Rubiaceae Anthocephalus chinensis


### 3.2. Structural Composition of Tree Species at Different Hill Position

The study revealed that the tree basal area was found higher in top hill (0.89 m2/ha) followed by bottom hill (0.36 m2/ha) and middle hill (0.22 m2/ha) with an average basal area of 0.49 m2/ha in the study area. However, middle hill showed highest tree density (1566 stems/ha) compared to bottom hill (1466 stems/ha) and top hill (1244 stems/ha) positions with an average of 1425 stems/ha in the study area (Table 2). Tree volume was also found higher in the bottom hill (248.79 m3/ha) followed by top hill (201.02 m3/ha) and middle hill (120.02 m3/ha), having an average volume of 189.9 (m3/ha) in the study area (Table 2).Table 2
Growth performance of tree species in different hill position of the study area.
Variables Top hill Middle hill Bottom hill Average Basal area (m2/ha) 0.888889 0.222222 0.361111 0.49 Tree density (stems/ha) 1244 1566 1466 1425.33 Tree volume (m3/ha) 201.02 120.02 248.79 189.9


### 3.3. Species Diversity Analysis

Diversity index was calculated for tree species. The Shannon-Wiener index value was found 3.49 in case of tree species which indicates that the plant diversity of the study area is less diverse whereas Simpson’s index value is 0.04 which represents that the area is not dominated by only a single species; it is dominated by few tree species (Table3).Table 3
Important biodiversity indices calculated for the study area.
Index Value Shannon-Wiener index 3.49 Simpson’s index 0.04


### 3.4. Structural Composition of Naturally Regenerated Seedling

In the study area, a total of 17 species belonging to 15 families were found to regenerate naturally at different hill positions (Table4). Among the families, only Euphorbiaceae and Moraceae showed more than one species to regenerate. All these regenerating species were observed at their tree phases.Table 4
List of naturally regenerated seedlings with their families in the study area.
Sl. number Family Scientific name Local name 1 Apocynaceae Holarrhena antidysenterica Kuruch 2 Bignoniaceae Stereospermum chelonoides Darmara 3 Burseraceae Bursera serrata Gutgutia 4 Combretaceae Terminalia bellirica Bohera 5 Dilleniaceae Dillenia pentagyna Hargaza 6 Euphorbiaceae Phyllanthus emblica Amloki Macaranga denticulate Bura 7 Lauraceae Beilschmiedia Pseudomicrocarpa Tuangiri 8 Leguminosae Erythrina variegate Madar 9 Meliaceae Toona ciliata Toon 10 Moraceae Ficus racemosa Joigga dumur Ficus hispida Dumur 11 Musaceae Musa textiles Pahari kola 12 Myrtaceae Syzygium fruticosum Puti Jam 13 Sterculiaceae Abroma augusta Ulat kombol 14 Tiliaceae Microcos paniculata Achargula 15 Verbenaceae Callicarpa macrophylla Bormala


### 3.5. Quantitative Structure of Naturally Regenerated Seedling at Different Hill Position

The regeneration study shows that the number of regenerating seedlings was found higher forBursera serrata (2292 seedlings/ha) at the top hill followed byStereospermum chelonoides (1250 seedlings/ha),Phyllanthus emblica (972 seedlings/ha),Dillenia pentagyna (917 seedlings/ha), andMacaranga denticulata (833 seedlings/ha) (Table 4). At the middle hill,Ficus hispida showed higher number of regenerating seedlings (2917 seedlings/ha) followed byBursera serrata (1575 seedlings/ha) andFicus racemosa (1319 seedlings/ha). On the other hand, at the bottom hill,Toona ciliata showed higher number of regeneration seedlings (4444 seedlings/ha) followed byBursera serrata (2708 seedlings/ha),Syzygium fruticosum (1736 seedlings/ha), andStereospermum chelonoides (1458 seedlings/ha). On average,Bursera serrata (2192 seedlings/ha) showed highest regeneration followed byToona ciliata (1481 seedlings/ha),Stereospermum chelonoides (1253 seedlings/ha),Ficus hispida (1181 seedlings/ha), andMacaranga denticulata (1088 seedlings/ha) compared to other species irrespective of hill positions. However,Toona ciliata showed remarkably higher regeneration at the bottom hill position compared to other regenerating species which might be due to favorable condition prevailing at the study area for this species. It was also observed that number of species at the regeneration stage was lowest at the bottom hill position (8 species) compared to top hill (11 species) and middle hill (11 species). Regeneration of seedlings per hectare was found to have occurred more in bottom hill (14374 seedlings/ha) compared to middle hill (13097 seedlings/ha) and top hill (9671 seedlings/ha) showing an average regeneration of 12381 seedlings/ha. Again, among the tree species,Toona ciliata (4444 seedlings/ha),Beilschmiedia psudomicrocarpa (903 seedlings/ha), andMicrocos paniculata (1181 seedlings/ha) were found regenerating at the bottom hill,Musa textiles (1313 seedlings/ha),Abroma augusta (694 seedlings/ha), andErythrina variegata (525 seedlings/ha) at the middle hill, andPhyllanthus emblica (972 seedlings/ha) andHolarrhena antidysenterica (764 seedlings/ha) at the top hill positions only (Table 5).Table 5
Quantitative structure of naturally regenerated seedlings found in the study area.
Sl. number Scientific name Regeneration density (seedlings/ha) Top hill Middle hill Bottom hill Average 1 Macaranga denticulate 833 1111 1319 1088 2 Ficus hispida 625 2917 — 1181 3 Phyllanthus emblica 972 — — 324 4 Callicarpa macrophylla 644 972 625 747 5 Dillenia pentagyna 917 833 — 583 6 Bursera serrata 2292 1575 2708 2192 7 Stereospermum chelonoides 1250 1050 1458 1253 8 Terminalia bellirica 486 788 — 425 9 Ficus racemosa 541 1319 — 620 10 Holarrhena antidysenterica 764 — — 255 11 Musa textiles — 1313 — 438 12 Syzygium fruticosum 347 — 1736 694 13 Erythrina variegate — 694 — 231 14 Abroma augusta — 525 — 175 15 Toona ciliata — — 4444 1481 16 Beilschmiedia pseudomicrocarpa — — 903 301 17 Microcos paniculata — — 1181 394  Total 9671 13097 14374 12381


### 3.6. Changes in Species Composition among Tree Phases

Study result also reveals that tree species diversity (Tables1 and 2) is higher than the regenerating species diversity (Tables 4 and 5). Among 47 tree species, growing in the study area, only 17 tree species (36%) were found regenerating and the remaining 30 tree species (64%) did not show any regeneration at the study (Table 6). This may be due to the anthropogenic disturbances that cause disruption of forest structure and changes in species composition ultimately leading to reduction of tree species richness and abundance.Table 6
List of species that did not show regeneration at the study area.
SI. number Family Scientific name 1 Anacardiaceae Lannea coromandelica Spondias pinnata 2 Apocynaceae Brownlowia elata Alstonia scholaris 3 Bombacaceae Bombax ceiba 4 Caesalpiniaceae Cassia fistula 5 Combretaceae Terminalia catappa 6 Cycadaceae Cycas pectinata 7 Dilleniaceae Dillenia indica 8 Ebenaceae Diospyros toposia 9 Fabaceae Erythrina stricta Derris robusta 10 Fagaceae Castanopsis tribuloides 11 Flacourtiaceae Flacourtia jangomas 12 Rubiaceae Anthocephalus chinensis 13 Lauraceae Litsea monopetala 14 Leguminosae Albizia procera Albizia chinensis 15 Lythraceae Lagerstroemia speciosa 16 Meliaceae Ficus pyriformis 17 Moraceae Artocarpus lacucha Artocarpus chaplasha 18 Papilionaceae Derris trifoliate 19 Rutaceae Feronia limonia 20 Sapindaceae Erioglossum edule 21 Sterculiaceae Pterospermum canescens Abroma augusta 22 Vaticeae Vitis glabrata 23 Verbenaceae Vitex peduncularis Gmelina arborea


### 3.7. Effects of Hill Position on Natural Regeneration

From the study it was observed that the highest amount of regeneration was found in the bottom and lowest amount of regeneration was found in the top hill (Table7). Significant difference was observed between top hill and bottom hill positions. However, middle hill did not show any significant difference in regeneration compared to top and bottom hill positions.Table 7
Regeneration of species in different position of the hill in Shitalpur Forest.
Hill position Mean amount of regeneration (seedlings/ha) Top 9671 b Middle 13097 ab Bottom 14374 a Note:differenta,b,ab superscripts in a column indicate the least significant differences at <0.05.


## 3.1. Tree Species Composition

In the study area, a total of 47 different tree species comprising 29 families were recorded. Among the families, Moraceae (5 species) comprises the highest number of species followed by Apocynaceae (3 species), Euphorbiaceae (3 species), Leguminosae (3 species), and Verbenaceae (3 species) and the rest of the families comprise one or two species (Table1).Table 1
List of tree species with their families and stems/ha in the study area.
Sl. number Name of family Scientific name 1 Anacardiaceae Lannea coromandelica Spondias pinnata  2 Apocynaceae Brownlowia elata Alstonia scholaris Holarrhena antidysenterica  3 Bignoniaceae Stereospermum chelonoides  4 Bombacaceae Bombax ceiba  5 Burseraceae Bursera serrata  6 Caesalpiniaceae Cassia fistula  7 Combretaceae Terminalia bellirica Terminalia catappa  8 Cycadaceae Cycas pectinata  9 Dilleniaceae Dillenia pentagyna Dillenia indica  10 Ebenaceae Diospyros toposia  11 Euphorbiaceae Macaranga denticulata Aporusa oblonga Phyllanthus emblica  12 Fabaceae Erythrina stricta Derris robusta  13 Fagaceae Castanopsis tribuloides  14 Flacourtiaceae Flacourtia jangomas  15 Lauraceae Beilschmiedia Pseudomicrocarpa Litsea monopetala  16 Leguminosae Albizia procera Erythrina variegate Albizia chinensis  17 Lythraceae Lagerstroemia speciosa  18 Meliaceae Toona ciliata  19 Moraceae Ficus hispida Ficus pyriformis Ficus racemosa Artocarpus lacucha Artocarpus chaplasha  20 Musaceae Musa textiles  21 Myrtaceae Syzygium fruticosum  22 Papilionaceae Derris trifoliate  23 Rutaceae Feronia limonia  24 Sapindaceae Erioglossum edule  25 Sterculiaceae Abroma augusta Pterospermum canescens  26 Tiliaceae Microcos paniculata  27 Vaticeae Vitis glabrata  28 Verbenaceae Callicarpa macrophylla Vitex peduncularis Gmelina arborea  29 Rubiaceae Anthocephalus chinensis


## 3.2. Structural Composition of Tree Species at Different Hill Position

The study revealed that the tree basal area was found higher in top hill (0.89 m2/ha) followed by bottom hill (0.36 m2/ha) and middle hill (0.22 m2/ha) with an average basal area of 0.49 m2/ha in the study area. However, middle hill showed highest tree density (1566 stems/ha) compared to bottom hill (1466 stems/ha) and top hill (1244 stems/ha) positions with an average of 1425 stems/ha in the study area (Table 2). Tree volume was also found higher in the bottom hill (248.79 m3/ha) followed by top hill (201.02 m3/ha) and middle hill (120.02 m3/ha), having an average volume of 189.9 (m3/ha) in the study area (Table 2).Table 2
Growth performance of tree species in different hill position of the study area.
Variables Top hill Middle hill Bottom hill Average Basal area (m2/ha) 0.888889 0.222222 0.361111 0.49 Tree density (stems/ha) 1244 1566 1466 1425.33 Tree volume (m3/ha) 201.02 120.02 248.79 189.9


## 3.3. Species Diversity Analysis

Diversity index was calculated for tree species. The Shannon-Wiener index value was found 3.49 in case of tree species which indicates that the plant diversity of the study area is less diverse whereas Simpson’s index value is 0.04 which represents that the area is not dominated by only a single species; it is dominated by few tree species (Table3).Table 3
Important biodiversity indices calculated for the study area.
Index Value Shannon-Wiener index 3.49 Simpson’s index 0.04


## 3.4. Structural Composition of Naturally Regenerated Seedling

In the study area, a total of 17 species belonging to 15 families were found to regenerate naturally at different hill positions (Table4). Among the families, only Euphorbiaceae and Moraceae showed more than one species to regenerate. All these regenerating species were observed at their tree phases.Table 4
List of naturally regenerated seedlings with their families in the study area.
Sl. number Family Scientific name Local name 1 Apocynaceae Holarrhena antidysenterica Kuruch 2 Bignoniaceae Stereospermum chelonoides Darmara 3 Burseraceae Bursera serrata Gutgutia 4 Combretaceae Terminalia bellirica Bohera 5 Dilleniaceae Dillenia pentagyna Hargaza 6 Euphorbiaceae Phyllanthus emblica Amloki Macaranga denticulate Bura 7 Lauraceae Beilschmiedia Pseudomicrocarpa Tuangiri 8 Leguminosae Erythrina variegate Madar 9 Meliaceae Toona ciliata Toon 10 Moraceae Ficus racemosa Joigga dumur Ficus hispida Dumur 11 Musaceae Musa textiles Pahari kola 12 Myrtaceae Syzygium fruticosum Puti Jam 13 Sterculiaceae Abroma augusta Ulat kombol 14 Tiliaceae Microcos paniculata Achargula 15 Verbenaceae Callicarpa macrophylla Bormala


## 3.5. Quantitative Structure of Naturally Regenerated Seedling at Different Hill Position

The regeneration study shows that the number of regenerating seedlings was found higher forBursera serrata (2292 seedlings/ha) at the top hill followed byStereospermum chelonoides (1250 seedlings/ha),Phyllanthus emblica (972 seedlings/ha),Dillenia pentagyna (917 seedlings/ha), andMacaranga denticulata (833 seedlings/ha) (Table 4). At the middle hill,Ficus hispida showed higher number of regenerating seedlings (2917 seedlings/ha) followed byBursera serrata (1575 seedlings/ha) andFicus racemosa (1319 seedlings/ha). On the other hand, at the bottom hill,Toona ciliata showed higher number of regeneration seedlings (4444 seedlings/ha) followed byBursera serrata (2708 seedlings/ha),Syzygium fruticosum (1736 seedlings/ha), andStereospermum chelonoides (1458 seedlings/ha). On average,Bursera serrata (2192 seedlings/ha) showed highest regeneration followed byToona ciliata (1481 seedlings/ha),Stereospermum chelonoides (1253 seedlings/ha),Ficus hispida (1181 seedlings/ha), andMacaranga denticulata (1088 seedlings/ha) compared to other species irrespective of hill positions. However,Toona ciliata showed remarkably higher regeneration at the bottom hill position compared to other regenerating species which might be due to favorable condition prevailing at the study area for this species. It was also observed that number of species at the regeneration stage was lowest at the bottom hill position (8 species) compared to top hill (11 species) and middle hill (11 species). Regeneration of seedlings per hectare was found to have occurred more in bottom hill (14374 seedlings/ha) compared to middle hill (13097 seedlings/ha) and top hill (9671 seedlings/ha) showing an average regeneration of 12381 seedlings/ha. Again, among the tree species,Toona ciliata (4444 seedlings/ha),Beilschmiedia psudomicrocarpa (903 seedlings/ha), andMicrocos paniculata (1181 seedlings/ha) were found regenerating at the bottom hill,Musa textiles (1313 seedlings/ha),Abroma augusta (694 seedlings/ha), andErythrina variegata (525 seedlings/ha) at the middle hill, andPhyllanthus emblica (972 seedlings/ha) andHolarrhena antidysenterica (764 seedlings/ha) at the top hill positions only (Table 5).Table 5
Quantitative structure of naturally regenerated seedlings found in the study area.
Sl. number Scientific name Regeneration density (seedlings/ha) Top hill Middle hill Bottom hill Average 1 Macaranga denticulate 833 1111 1319 1088 2 Ficus hispida 625 2917 — 1181 3 Phyllanthus emblica 972 — — 324 4 Callicarpa macrophylla 644 972 625 747 5 Dillenia pentagyna 917 833 — 583 6 Bursera serrata 2292 1575 2708 2192 7 Stereospermum chelonoides 1250 1050 1458 1253 8 Terminalia bellirica 486 788 — 425 9 Ficus racemosa 541 1319 — 620 10 Holarrhena antidysenterica 764 — — 255 11 Musa textiles — 1313 — 438 12 Syzygium fruticosum 347 — 1736 694 13 Erythrina variegate — 694 — 231 14 Abroma augusta — 525 — 175 15 Toona ciliata — — 4444 1481 16 Beilschmiedia pseudomicrocarpa — — 903 301 17 Microcos paniculata — — 1181 394  Total 9671 13097 14374 12381


## 3.6. Changes in Species Composition among Tree Phases

Study result also reveals that tree species diversity (Tables1 and 2) is higher than the regenerating species diversity (Tables 4 and 5). Among 47 tree species, growing in the study area, only 17 tree species (36%) were found regenerating and the remaining 30 tree species (64%) did not show any regeneration at the study (Table 6). This may be due to the anthropogenic disturbances that cause disruption of forest structure and changes in species composition ultimately leading to reduction of tree species richness and abundance.Table 6
List of species that did not show regeneration at the study area.
SI. number Family Scientific name 1 Anacardiaceae Lannea coromandelica Spondias pinnata 2 Apocynaceae Brownlowia elata Alstonia scholaris 3 Bombacaceae Bombax ceiba 4 Caesalpiniaceae Cassia fistula 5 Combretaceae Terminalia catappa 6 Cycadaceae Cycas pectinata 7 Dilleniaceae Dillenia indica 8 Ebenaceae Diospyros toposia 9 Fabaceae Erythrina stricta Derris robusta 10 Fagaceae Castanopsis tribuloides 11 Flacourtiaceae Flacourtia jangomas 12 Rubiaceae Anthocephalus chinensis 13 Lauraceae Litsea monopetala 14 Leguminosae Albizia procera Albizia chinensis 15 Lythraceae Lagerstroemia speciosa 16 Meliaceae Ficus pyriformis 17 Moraceae Artocarpus lacucha Artocarpus chaplasha 18 Papilionaceae Derris trifoliate 19 Rutaceae Feronia limonia 20 Sapindaceae Erioglossum edule 21 Sterculiaceae Pterospermum canescens Abroma augusta 22 Vaticeae Vitis glabrata 23 Verbenaceae Vitex peduncularis Gmelina arborea


## 3.7. Effects of Hill Position on Natural Regeneration

From the study it was observed that the highest amount of regeneration was found in the bottom and lowest amount of regeneration was found in the top hill (Table7). Significant difference was observed between top hill and bottom hill positions. However, middle hill did not show any significant difference in regeneration compared to top and bottom hill positions.Table 7
Regeneration of species in different position of the hill in Shitalpur Forest.
Hill position Mean amount of regeneration (seedlings/ha) Top 9671 b Middle 13097 ab Bottom 14374 a Note:differenta,b,ab superscripts in a column indicate the least significant differences at <0.05.


## 4. Discussion

Species composition, density, and regeneration status can be considered important factors to judge the status of a forest. A total of 47 different tree species comprising 29 families were recorded from the study area of which about 62% of the families are represented by only one species, 21% of the families by two species, 14% of the families by three species, and only 3% of the families by more than three species. The findings of the present study showed better species composition compared to a study [26] conducted by Ahmed and Haque where 38 tree species were identified whereas other studies [27–31] found better species composition than the present study showing 64 species, 85 tree species, 92 tree species, 163 species, and 62 tree species, respectively. Moraceae was the dominant family (5 species) with naturally growing fruit species, likeArtocarpus chaplasha,Artocarpus lacucha,Ficus hispida,Ficus pyriformis, andFicus racemosa that provide food and shelter to wildlife species. The dominance of this family might be due to the excellent dispersal capacities of their seeds, pollen grains, and so forth by wind, water, birds, mammals, and humans. Similar studies by Newaz [32] also recorded maximum number of species from the family Leguminosae followed by Moraceae and Myrtaceae, and Das [33] documented that Leguminosae contains higher number of species than Bignoniaceae followed by Moraceae, Sapindaceae, and Myrtaceae and some other families. This suggests that Moraceae is a more or less common family in the hill ecosystems.The study reveals a degraded forest status with less tree density (1425 stems/ha) and species regeneration (12381 seedlings/ha) compared to some previous study conducted in different parts of greater Chittagong region [27, 33, 34]. The reason behind less tree density and species regeneration might be due to the degraded environmental condition at the study area and at the same time overexploitation by the local people as they collect bigger trees for their own consumption and extra income. This way local people are also disturbing the forest floor and contributing greatly towards biodiversity loss. However, the present study shows better tree density (1425 stems/ha) in comparison to 381 stems/ha in Sitapahar reserve forest of Chittagong Hill Tracts (South) Forest Division [35], 459 stems/ha in Chunati WS [29], 257 stems/ha in Ukhiya natural forests of Cox’s-Bazar Forest Division [26], 369 stems/ha in Bamu reserve forests of Cox’s Bazar [28], and 384 stems/ha in aDipterocarpus forest in Bangladesh [36]. Middle hill showed highest tree density (1566 stems/ha) compared to bottom hill (1466 stems/ha) and top hill (1244 stems/ha) positions. Study conducted by [37] also observed highest density at mid altitude site compared to lower and lowest altitude site although [38] reported significantly negative correlation of density and species richness with altitude and slope.Bursera serrata,Toona ciliata,Stereospermum chelonoides,Ficus hispida,Macaranga denticulata,Callicarpa macrophylla, andSyzygium fruticosum were found dominating (higher numbers of seedlings/ha) among the regenerated tree species.The Shannon-Wiener index (3.49) represents less plant diversity of the study area whereas Simpson’s index (0.04) depicts fewer numbers of species growing in the study area (Table3). Nandi and Vacik [39] also observed less species diversity with trees under dbh > 6 cm category at the Sitakunda Botanical Garden and Eco-Park, Chittagong, which is adjoining the study area. Though Sitakunda Botanical Garden and Eco-Park, once under the jurisdiction of Shitalpur Forest Beat, is managed as a special protected area for more than 15 years, the species diversity is still showing a meager value. This means that the anthropogenic disturbance may be the major cause of deforestation and forest degradation leading to less species diversity surrounding the study area. The same may also be true for the study area.Our result indicates thatBursera serrata possess the highest number of seedlings per ha at the top hill followed byStereospermum chelonoides,Phyllanthus emblica,Dillenia pentagyna, andMacaranga denticulata. While [32] found that top and middle hill were dominated byStereospermum chelonoides, the valley was dominated byFicus auriculata. So it is seen thatStereospermum chelonoides species is a common species at the secondary forest of Chittagong Forest Division. Moreover, regeneration of species was found to have occurred more in bottom hill and middle hill compared to top hill in this study area whereas [40] showed denser regeneration in nearly leveled hill tops and gentle slopes and moderately dense generation in medium slopes at the Sitakunda Botanical Garden and Eco-Park, Chittagong, Bangladesh. Study [33] also found highest seedling/ha at middle hill followed by top hill and bottom hill. We did find significant difference between the top hill and bottom hill position in terms of regeneration.Change in species composition across mature and regenerating tree phases was observed at the study area. In this study, we found species without regenerating phases which is example of discontinuous population structures. Most of the tree species were absent at their regeneration stage at the study area. Only 36% of the tree species (17 out of 47) are regenerating in the study area, meaning majority of the tree species (64%) are not getting favorable conditions to regenerate. Such example was found in [41]. The size class structures of trees indicate the probability of species persistence into the future; this information is very valuable in the design of management strategies aiming to improve stand structure and species diversity. Changes in species composition and recruitment of new species in different vegetation types are indicative of future species composition in changing environments [41].


## 5. Conclusion

The study revealed that Shitalpur Forest Beat is under threat of overextraction and illegal cutting which in the future may reduce both tree density and diversity drastically. Such detrimental interferences must be stopped immediately; otherwise this will reduce natural forest restoration capacity. The ecologically important plant species may be conserved through bothin situ andex situ conservation methods. It came out from the study that most of the people living near the forest area are poor, so they depend on forest for their livelihood. It has been observed that there exists a great demand and supply gap of fuel wood and other associated timber in this area, which ultimately increases the pressure of pilferage and illicit felling of trees from forest. To mitigate these problems and to maintain the complexity, species diversity, normal composition, and natural environment of Shitalpur Forest, large scale reforestation program can be carried out. However, adequate information and knowledge on the sustainable management of existing and potential resources in the study area is not available. So, there is a need to have a well-organized database on Shitalpur Forest resources for the purpose of forest protection and biodiversity conservation.



---

*Source: 5947874-2016-11-03.xml*