# Magnetic Alignment Detection Using Existing Charging Facility in Wireless EV Chargers

Authors: Yabiao Gao; Aleff Antonio Oliveira; Kathleen Blair Farley; Zion Tsz Ho  Tse
Journal: Journal of Sensors
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

Wireless charging is a promising outlet to promote the electric vehicle (EV) industry due to its safe and noncontact manner. Wireless EV chargers require the secondary receiver coil to be well aligned with the primary station for efficient charging, which could require more of the driver’s time and attention when parking a vehicle. Therefore, this paper presents a magnetic alignment system to assist the EV driver during parking. The magnetic alignment approach uses the existing coil and frequency tracking control electronics of wireless chargers to detect the distance between the two coils while using 4 small auxiliary coils for direction and fine adjustment, leading to a cost effective detection method for coil alignment in electric vehicle wireless charging (EVWC). The testing results of a prototype show acceptable measurement correctness and the mean error for ten trials in range detection is within 0.25 cm at three different misalignment conditions (10.5, 15, and 20 cm). The positioning accuracy of coil alignment is within 1.2 cm for three different start positions with the auxiliary coils.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Over the past decade, pure electric vehicles (EVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) have increased in popularity due to environmental awareness and fossil fuel price fluctuations [1–7]. Wireless charging is a competitive option to overcome the inconvenience of plug-in EV charging and the relatively low energy density stored in batteries by opportunity charging [2]. A wireless EV charger typically includes power electronics that convert the grid power to a high frequency power source: the primary coils placed/buried on ground, the secondary coil mounted underneath the chassis of the EVs, on-board electronics that rectify the secondary output to charge the EV battery, and a communication module between ground facility and the on-board electronics [8].The efficiency of wireless charging highly relies on the alignment condition between the two charging pads [9]. The wireless EV chargers can commonly tolerate a misalignment error of only 10 cm, which presents a challenge to EV drivers while parking over a wireless charging station [10]. Birrell et al. investigated the effects of drivers’ behavior and parking alignment on wireless chargers [10]. According to their study, the mean longitudinal misalignment is more than 70 cm when the drivers parked over a wireless charging pad with no guidance from external support. The study also shows that only 5% of EVs can park well enough to achieve efficient wireless charging. Since the wireless chargers can only endure limited misalignment, advanced frequency control methods and coupler design have been investigated with the goal to improve the alignment flexibility for EV wireless charging. These advanced design indeed have better performance than a common one. However, it still cannot compensate for parking errors greater than 0.7 m (which is greater than the diameter of the coils). Hence, a vehicle alignment system should be a necessary subsystem of wireless EV chargers. Additionally, the alignment system has been seen as an essential module of wireless EV chargers in the newly released SAE technical standards (SAE-J2954) [11].To the best of the authors’ knowledge, the magnetic method is the best option for alignment detection. It uses the existing coil to generate a weak magnetic field that is detected by magnetic sensors installed on the secondary side. Although RF positioning can meet the accuracy requirement of alignment control, more than one RF antenna need to be fixed on the primary side, which potentially increases its cost and leads to a complex system. Other potential detection methods include RFID positioning, GPS, optical detection, mechanical stop, and mechanical arm. The accuracy of RFID is more than 50 cm which is inaccurate for alignment. The cost becomes increasingly high if the pressure sensors are buried underground. Machine vision seems promising in vehicle alignment. However, it cannot work if the charging stations are covered with snow in winter. The GPS signals are unavailable sometimes, and the positioning accuracy is limited to 5 m [12]. The mechanical stop is large in size and cannot support automated alignment control, while using a mechanical arm will increase the cost and make the system more complex.There is currently still limited literature available regarding the design of an alignment system for wireless EV chargers. Ni et al. presented a conceptual radio alignment system for EV wireless charging [13]. The system applied eight radio nodes with four on the ground and the other four mounted underneath the secondary pad to sense the relative position between the primary and secondary coils. The radio nodes used by the system are based on an indoor ranging technique called wireless ad hoc system for positioning (WASP), which operates in 5.8-GHz ISM band with a bandwidth of 125 MHz and achieves a distance measurement error of about 0.2 m. Shuwei et al. introduced an alignment system using sixteen reference RFID tags and two readers placed on ground and one tracking tag attached to the vehicle [14]. Although the radio alignment method is an alternative option for EV wireless chargers, it can increase the system complexity and thus result in a high-cost wireless charging system. The price of each commercial radio reader can be as high as several thousand dollars, which surpasses the cost of the basic charging electronics. For example, the current price of a commercialized 3.3 kW plugless wireless EV charger is as low as $1260 for Chevy Volt [15]. Therefore, the radio alignment system might encounter cost issues in an open market where the configuration that meets requirements with minimal cost survives. Moreover, the additional operating frequency band of the radio positioning system could possibly cause electromagnetic interference issues.This paper introduces a magnetic sensing system for alignment in wireless EV chargers. The system utilizes the existing charging facility to generate a magnetic field and sense the relative distance between the two coil centers. The system also requires four minor coils to be installed on the secondary pad for direction detection using triangulation. The four small coils are also able to adjust the alignment when the two major coils are close enough, ensuring the primary and secondary pads are well aligned.


## 2. Overview of Magnetic Alignment for Wireless EV Charging

Figure1(a) illustrates the components of the wireless charging system used for alignment detection. Since the phase-angle between output voltage and current of the inverter changes along with the operating frequency and coil spatial distribution, the distance between the primary and secondary coils can be measured by the phase-angle feedback and the WPT system’s frequency characteristics on misalignment. The digital signal processor (DSP) controller switches the frequency of pulse width modulation (PWM) signals and acquires phase-angle signals and charging information from the vehicle side via wireless communication. Two half-bridge insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) modules (FF100R12K4, Infineon) are employed to form the H-bridge that drives the transmitter coil to generate high frequency electromagnetic fields. The voltage/current induced in the receiver is rectified to DC to power the load or charge a battery. A National Instrument (NI) Data Acquisition (DAQ) card (NI CompactRio-9075) with wireless communication modules is used to transmit the data from the primary to the secondary side wirelessly. A user interface is developed in LabVIEW to display the alignment information for the driver while parking.Figure 1
(a) Block diagram of the proposed magnetic alignment system using existing wireless charging equipment; (b) secondary coil with four small auxiliary coils (A–D) for direction and fine adjustment (unit: cm).P is the primary center while S is the secondary center.
(a)
(b)Figure1(b) shows the mechanical schematic of the secondary coil. The four minor coils can detect its distance from the primary center when the two coils begin to overlap. Since the actual magnetic field strength and distribution are always different from the computational value, the minor coils’ output distance is outputted by matching the immediate value with an experimentally acquired data space. This scenario is used when the two big coils are close enough with each other that the big-coil’s detection limit might not be effective. The use of four coils allows the system to determine whether the driver needs to move left, right, forward, or backward. The zero misalignment occurs when the relative value of the four nodes is 0. The four small coils are mounted symmetrically.Figure1 is the existing hardware for wireless charging except for the four minor coils and an ultrasonic sensor (MaxSonar-EZ2, MaxBotix Inc., Brainerd, MN, USA) for height measurement. Therefore, the alignment system shares most of the electronic components with the charging facility, leading to a low-cost detection. After completion of alignment operation, the DSP controller will tune its optimal switching frequency based on the phase-angle feedback as well as the battery’s state of charge and then start charging.Figure2 is a block diagram of the phase-angle measurement module. The four relays are used to isolate the power electronics from the control electronics due to the high power in wireless charging. The comparators are used to transform the output voltage (V
s) and current (I
s) signals from the inverter into two square waveforms. The phase delay between V
s and I
s is measured by an exclusive-OR gate (XOR) that combines the two square waveforms to one pulse waveform. A low-pass filter converts the pulse into a DC signal V
phs; then the DSP reads the voltage signal and obtains the phase-angle information. The DC output of the filter is proportional to the phase-angle between V
s and I
s. The DC input voltage is operated at a relatively low voltage (limited to 24 V) during the vehicle alignment process, as lower voltage levels are much safer for the control electronics.Figure 2
Phase-angle measurement between the inverter’s output voltage and current.In the phase-angle measurement circuit, the voltage probe is directly connected to the output of the power inverter by a resistance divider. This is because the switching frequency is more than 10 kHz, and thus such high frequency makes a typical commercialized hall-effect voltage sensor unable to catch the fast response time. The AC current is measured by a current transformer. Although discrete Fourier transform (DFT) can be programmed in DSP for phase-angle measurements, using an XOR, and an RC filter greatly simplifies the embedded software development process and reduces the computational load of the DSP.


## 3. Range Detection Using Charging Coils

Figure3 shows the resonant tank using series parallel topology for wireless power transmission (WPT). The primary and secondary coil both have 12 turns. The inductance of primary coil L
p is 65.3 μH and the secondary coil inductance L
s is 65.1 μH. The tuning capacitance for both sides (C
p and C
s) is 1 μF. According to the equivalent circuit shown in Figure 3(b), the circuit impedance Z
(
ω
) is(1)
Z
ω
=
1
j
ω
C
p
+
j
ω
L
p
-
L
m
+
j
ω
L
m
/ /
j
ω
L
s
-
L
m
+
1
j
ω
C
s
/ /
R
L
,where j is the imaginary unit, ω is the angular frequency, L
m is the mutual inductance between the two coils, and R
L is the equivalent resistance of the battery, which can be calculated using the delivered power and voltage across the battery. For a desired 1.4 kW/120 V battery charging condition, R
L is 20 Ω.Figure 3
(a) Simplified circuit model of the WPT; (b) equivalent circuit.
(a)
(b)The coupling coefficientk is defined as (2)
k
=
L
m
L
p
L
s
.According to the Neumann formula, the mutual inductance is a function of coil dimension and spatial arrangement. Since the coil dimension has been determined, the coupling coefficient is a function of misalignment and air gaps. Therefore, the coil misalignment can be measured through analyzing frequency characteristics of WPT.Figure4 is the simulated impedance and phase characteristics in the frequency domain with multiple coupling coefficient values. For each curve of the phase-angle in Figure 4(b), one zero-crossing point exists, which indicates the resonant frequency. The resonant frequency varies with different coupling coefficients. Thus, the lateral distance between two coils can be obtained through adjusting the frequency until the phase-angle becomes zero. The resonant frequency indicates the lateral distance.Figure 4
(a) Impedance magnitude across frequency domain; (b) phase-angle across frequency domain. The parameters of the wireless charging system wereL
p
=
65 μH, L
s
=
65 μH, C
p
=
1 μF, C
s
=
1 μF, and R
=
20 Ω, and the mutual inductance L
m was assumed as 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, 15, 17.5, 20, 22.5, and 25 μH in the simulation.
(a)
(b)For an accurate measurement, a calibration is necessary to build a data space that allows the resonant frequency to match with it. The built-in data space is composed of 25 sets of misalignments and resonant frequencies for each height. Since the vehicle chassis might be slightly varied due to tire pressure or the weight it carries, the height should be taken into account when building the data space, making it a multidimensional array. The calibration is conducted for each step of 1 cm so the total calibrated ranging is up to 25 cm for each height. Following Figure4(b), the misalignment value can be assumed to change linearly with the measured resonant frequency f between two calibration points as close as possible. Hence, the misalignment L can be obtained by(3)
L
=
L
i
+
f
-
f
i
f
i
+
1
-
f
i
,
i
∈
0
,
D
,where i is the index number of the calibrated lateral distance L
i between two coil centers, f
i and f
i
+
1 are the resonant frequency when the lateral distance is L
i and L
i
+
1, and D is the calibrated range and is 25 in our experiment.Figure5(a) shows the flowchart used for lateral detection. As shown in Figure 5(a), the resonant frequency is located through adjusting the frequency, reading the phase-angle feedback, and comparing between current and previous angles (θ
current and θ
previous). The resonant frequency is obtained when the current phase-angle (θ
current) is lower than t, which is close to zero. After that, the microcontroller will match the resonant frequency with the built-in data space and calculate the lateral distance by (3).Figure 5
(a) Flowchart for lateral distance detection; (b) flowchart of operation planning of the magnetic alignment system.
(a)
(b)


## 4. Auxiliary Coils for Minor Adjustment

The four minor coils act as an auxiliary device for minor adjustment to ensure the vehicle is parked perfectly. The auxiliary coil inductance is measured by a LCR meter, and the resonant capacitor is calculated by(4)
C
=
1
4
π
2
f
2
L
,where L is the inductance of the auxiliary coil and f is the resonant frequency of the small coil. The switching frequency is assumed as 20 kHz which is the proposed switching frequency of the wireless EV charger. Figure 6(a) shows the auxiliary coil was made in printed circuit board (PCB). Table 1 shows the auxiliary coil’s specification.Table 1
Parameters of the auxiliary coil.
Specification
Auxiliary coil
Inductance (µH)
17.1
Resonant capacitor (µF)
3.7
Number of turns
10
Diameter of coil (mm)
51.5
Coil track width (mm)
1.0
Coil track separation (mm)
1.0Figure 6
(a) A picture of auxiliary nodes; (b) circuit diagram for auxiliary coils.
(a)
(b)Figure6(b) shows the circuit diagram for the four auxiliary coils. It includes an inverting amplifier, a rectifier consisting of four Schottky diodes, and a film capacitor for filtering the output voltage variations. Since the operating frequency of the wireless charging system can range from 15 kHz to 25 kHz, the electric components need to be able to operate in the frequency band. In Figure 5, the capacitor C
0 together with the feedback resistor adds a null end to the Bode plot of the circuit, lowering the bandwidth of the amplifier and filtering high frequency noises. The rectifier and the filtering capacitor convert the alternating current (AC) signals of the amplifier to direct current (DC) signals which are then acquired by the NI DAQ module. Because the data card faces difficulty in acquiring the high frequency signal, it is necessary to convert the signal to DC first then the data card for further processing in LabVIEW.


### 4.1. Operating Plan of the Alignment System

The operation plan of the alignment detection is shown in Figure5(b). When the vehicle is parked, the alignment system is automatically activated from sleep mode. Firstly, the charging facility reads the vehicle height and then calibrates and chooses the appropriate built-in data array for matching purposes. Secondly, it measures and displays the immediate lateral distance L
current and the four auxiliary coils’ outputs for direction estimation. Thirdly, it compares the current lateral distance with the previous one to decide whether it is the right time to alert the driver to start minor adjustments. Finally, the charging process is initiated after both the charging pads are well aligned and the driver shifts into park and locks the transmission.


## 4.1. Operating Plan of the Alignment System

The operation plan of the alignment detection is shown in Figure5(b). When the vehicle is parked, the alignment system is automatically activated from sleep mode. Firstly, the charging facility reads the vehicle height and then calibrates and chooses the appropriate built-in data array for matching purposes. Secondly, it measures and displays the immediate lateral distance L
current and the four auxiliary coils’ outputs for direction estimation. Thirdly, it compares the current lateral distance with the previous one to decide whether it is the right time to alert the driver to start minor adjustments. Finally, the charging process is initiated after both the charging pads are well aligned and the driver shifts into park and locks the transmission.


## 5. Results and Discussion

### 5.1. Experimental Setup

Figure7(a) shows the experimental platform used to validate the magnetic sensing for alignment purposes. The 3-axis platform shown in Figure 7(a) is modified from a CNC machine (Model DHC, PlasmaCAM, Inc., Colorado City, CO, USA). The platform has a width of 1.75 m, a height of 1.65 m, and a depth of 1.65 m with a maximum speed of 25 m/min in the horizontal direction and 2 m/min in the vertical direction. The movable ranges are 1.2 m × 1.2 m in the horizontal plane and 0.6 m in the vertical direction. Figure 7(b) is the power inverter of the wireless charging and was used to drive the coil and generate a magnetic field for alignment. The user operated the control panel to adjust the coil alignment based on the computer interface’s navigational information. The distance between the two coils was recorded after the user completed the test. The users did not have access to visually obtain the two coils’ spatial distribution to ensure the functionality of the alignment system.Figure 7
(a) Three-axis platform; (b) power inverter and frequency control electronics.
(a)
(b)


### 5.2. Experimental Results with Lateral Distance Detection

Figure8 shows the experimental comparison between measured values by the charging electronics and the true values. Figure 8(a) is the experimental result when the coil air gap is 12 cm and Figure 8(b) is the result when the gap is 11.5 cm. The mean error is 0.2 cm in Figure 8(a) while it is 0.34 cm in Figure 8(b). As the system was calibrated at an air gap of 12 cm, the system shows more accurate measurement at 12 cm than 11.5 cm. The measurement error is relatively higher when the two coils are very close together (<2 cm). This is because that magnetic coupling is similar when the two coils are almost strictly aligned. In this case, the resonant frequency of the WPT system varies little, making the system have relatively low sensitivity when the charging coils are in close to perfect alignment. Since the wireless charging system can endure some misalignment, the alignment can still meet the requirements as long as the navigation error is lower than 10 cm for a common wireless EV charger.Figure 8
Experimental comparison between measured and true values across the whole measurement range. (a) Height = 12 cm; (b) height = 11.5 cm.
(a)
(b)Figure9(a) shows the measurement accuracy of the alignment system when the lateral distance between two coils is 5 cm, 10.5 cm, and 15 cm. The measurement was repeated 10 times for each lateral distance. The mean error is 0.2 cm (S
T
D
=
0) at the misalignment of 5 cm, 0.25 (S
T
D
=
0.05) at 10.5 cm, and 0.12 cm (S
T
D
=
0.03) at 15 cm. These data show that the system has a high measurement repeatability.Figure 9
(a) Measurement accuracy at three lateral distances under a chassis height of 11.5 cm; (b) measurement accuracy between two well aligned coils under a chassis height of 11.5 cm. The measurement was repeated 3 times for each starting position.
(a)
(b)


### 5.3. Minor Adjustment with Auxiliary Coils

Figure9(b) shows the positioning accuracy between the two well aligned charging coils with assistance from the four auxiliary coils. The experiment was repeated three times for each starting position. The mean error is 0.9 cm when the starting point’s coordinate is (
0
,
15
), 1.1 cm for (
15
,
15
), and 1.2 cm for (−15, 15). Since the (
0
,
15
) starting point is located on the y-axis, the error is slightly smaller than the other two conditions whose starting positions are in the first and second quadrants, respectively. All three mean errors are lower than 1.2 cm, which is within the acceptable range of misalignment in wireless EV charging.


### 5.4. Comparison with Other Alignment Solutions

Table2 shows the performance comparison of different alignment technologies used in EVWC. All the techniques listed in Table 2 can achieve accuracies of several centimeters. The magnetic alignment solution is of low cost as it shares the same hardware and software with the wireless charging system. Since the magnetic field can be shaped by the existence of an EV, the effective detection distance of magnetic alignment might be limited. The machine vision can be a direct way to navigate the EV drivers to park. One drawback of machine vision is that it can be out of function in a snow day due to the fact that the charging stations are always buried underground. Ultrasonic and RF positioning is a mature technique and has wide application in indoor navigation. As RF positioning requires radio readers and tags, it might be high in cost for wireless chargers. Ultrasonic positioning might not work when debris is placed on ground and hinders ultrasound transmission.Table 2
Comparison among potential alignment techniques for wireless EV chargers.
Techniques
Description
Pros
Cons
Reference
Magnetic sensing
Using existing coils and auxiliary coils
Simple and low-cost implementation by sharing the charging facility
Detection distance might be relatively small
[16]
Machine vision
Including a camera and monitor
Visibly detect the charging station
Invalid when ground is covered with snow
[17]
Ultrasonic positioning
Including a few ultrasonic transmitters and receivers
Mature technology and can be high in accuracy
High cost and difficulty to go through debris
[18]
RF positioning
Including radio readers and multiple tags
Mature technology and simple implementation
High cost and complexity
[13, 18]


## 5.1. Experimental Setup

Figure7(a) shows the experimental platform used to validate the magnetic sensing for alignment purposes. The 3-axis platform shown in Figure 7(a) is modified from a CNC machine (Model DHC, PlasmaCAM, Inc., Colorado City, CO, USA). The platform has a width of 1.75 m, a height of 1.65 m, and a depth of 1.65 m with a maximum speed of 25 m/min in the horizontal direction and 2 m/min in the vertical direction. The movable ranges are 1.2 m × 1.2 m in the horizontal plane and 0.6 m in the vertical direction. Figure 7(b) is the power inverter of the wireless charging and was used to drive the coil and generate a magnetic field for alignment. The user operated the control panel to adjust the coil alignment based on the computer interface’s navigational information. The distance between the two coils was recorded after the user completed the test. The users did not have access to visually obtain the two coils’ spatial distribution to ensure the functionality of the alignment system.Figure 7
(a) Three-axis platform; (b) power inverter and frequency control electronics.
(a)
(b)


## 5.2. Experimental Results with Lateral Distance Detection

Figure8 shows the experimental comparison between measured values by the charging electronics and the true values. Figure 8(a) is the experimental result when the coil air gap is 12 cm and Figure 8(b) is the result when the gap is 11.5 cm. The mean error is 0.2 cm in Figure 8(a) while it is 0.34 cm in Figure 8(b). As the system was calibrated at an air gap of 12 cm, the system shows more accurate measurement at 12 cm than 11.5 cm. The measurement error is relatively higher when the two coils are very close together (<2 cm). This is because that magnetic coupling is similar when the two coils are almost strictly aligned. In this case, the resonant frequency of the WPT system varies little, making the system have relatively low sensitivity when the charging coils are in close to perfect alignment. Since the wireless charging system can endure some misalignment, the alignment can still meet the requirements as long as the navigation error is lower than 10 cm for a common wireless EV charger.Figure 8
Experimental comparison between measured and true values across the whole measurement range. (a) Height = 12 cm; (b) height = 11.5 cm.
(a)
(b)Figure9(a) shows the measurement accuracy of the alignment system when the lateral distance between two coils is 5 cm, 10.5 cm, and 15 cm. The measurement was repeated 10 times for each lateral distance. The mean error is 0.2 cm (S
T
D
=
0) at the misalignment of 5 cm, 0.25 (S
T
D
=
0.05) at 10.5 cm, and 0.12 cm (S
T
D
=
0.03) at 15 cm. These data show that the system has a high measurement repeatability.Figure 9
(a) Measurement accuracy at three lateral distances under a chassis height of 11.5 cm; (b) measurement accuracy between two well aligned coils under a chassis height of 11.5 cm. The measurement was repeated 3 times for each starting position.
(a)
(b)


## 5.3. Minor Adjustment with Auxiliary Coils

Figure9(b) shows the positioning accuracy between the two well aligned charging coils with assistance from the four auxiliary coils. The experiment was repeated three times for each starting position. The mean error is 0.9 cm when the starting point’s coordinate is (
0
,
15
), 1.1 cm for (
15
,
15
), and 1.2 cm for (−15, 15). Since the (
0
,
15
) starting point is located on the y-axis, the error is slightly smaller than the other two conditions whose starting positions are in the first and second quadrants, respectively. All three mean errors are lower than 1.2 cm, which is within the acceptable range of misalignment in wireless EV charging.


## 5.4. Comparison with Other Alignment Solutions

Table2 shows the performance comparison of different alignment technologies used in EVWC. All the techniques listed in Table 2 can achieve accuracies of several centimeters. The magnetic alignment solution is of low cost as it shares the same hardware and software with the wireless charging system. Since the magnetic field can be shaped by the existence of an EV, the effective detection distance of magnetic alignment might be limited. The machine vision can be a direct way to navigate the EV drivers to park. One drawback of machine vision is that it can be out of function in a snow day due to the fact that the charging stations are always buried underground. Ultrasonic and RF positioning is a mature technique and has wide application in indoor navigation. As RF positioning requires radio readers and tags, it might be high in cost for wireless chargers. Ultrasonic positioning might not work when debris is placed on ground and hinders ultrasound transmission.Table 2
Comparison among potential alignment techniques for wireless EV chargers.
Techniques
Description
Pros
Cons
Reference
Magnetic sensing
Using existing coils and auxiliary coils
Simple and low-cost implementation by sharing the charging facility
Detection distance might be relatively small
[16]
Machine vision
Including a camera and monitor
Visibly detect the charging station
Invalid when ground is covered with snow
[17]
Ultrasonic positioning
Including a few ultrasonic transmitters and receivers
Mature technology and can be high in accuracy
High cost and difficulty to go through debris
[18]
RF positioning
Including radio readers and multiple tags
Mature technology and simple implementation
High cost and complexity
[13, 18]


## 6. Conclusion

A magnetic alignment system using existing charging electronics demonstrates that it can be a practical approach to address the misalignment issues in wireless EV charging. The distance between the two coils is transmitted to the user immediately for navigation purposes. The four auxiliary coils provide direction information and help the driver adjust the vehicle to ensure good alignment. The positioning error of the magnetic alignment system is within 1.2 cm and allows for highly efficient wireless charging. The whole system is based on the existing wireless charging facility except for the four small auxiliary coils; thus, the overall cost of the system should be much smaller than an additional alignment system such as RF positioning.



---

*Source: 5670510-2016-01-05.xml*