# Removal and Adsorption ofp-Nitrophenol from Aqueous Solutions Using Carbon Nanotubes and Their Composites

Authors: Yuan-Xiang Yao; He-Bing Li; Jin-Yun Liu; Xin-Liang Tan; Jin-Gang Yu; Zhi-Guang Peng
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

In an attempt to explore the possibility of using carbon nanotubes (CNTs) as efficient adsorbents for removal of pollutants from the contaminated water, the adsorption ofp-nitrophenol (PNP) on raw multiwalled carbon nanotubes (r.MWNTs) with different outer diameters, various functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes (f-MWNTs), raw single-walled carbon nanotubes (r.SWNTs) and oxidized single-walled  carbon nanotubes (ox-SWNTs) has been investigated. The ox-SWNTs showed better adsorption ability for PNP with different concentrations, while lower uptake capacity was found for all of the r.MWNTs and f-MWNTs. The removal efficiency of PNP by ox-SWNTs was around 98%, indicating that ox-SWNTs possess a great potential application prospect for removing PNP from aqueous solutions.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Because of an accumulated interaction with blood, nitrophenols can potentially cause cyanosis, confusion, and unconsciousness [1]. Exposure to nitrophenol could also cause skin and eye burns. However, many untreated industrial effluents, such as pesticides, pharmaceuticals, wood preservatives, and petrochemicals industries, are discharged into the environment. To remove nitrophenol from contaminated water, various techniques such as membrane filtration [2], degradation [3, 4], adsorption [2, 5], and chemical reduction [6–8] have been reported. Taking advantage of high efficiency, simplicity, and low costs, adsorption is usually considered a most widely applicable technology for the removal of pollutants from aqueous solution. However, the adsorption performance of an adsorbent is highly dependent on its chemical composition and physicochemical characteristics such as shape, size, and dispersion of particles. To obtain novel absorbent materials with effective adsorption as well as lower costs, continuous research and development activities focus on design and preparation of different structured porous [9, 10] and nanostructured materials [5, 11] with high surface area and strong adsorption affinity.Due to the unique physicochemical and electrical properties, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have been widely used in the field of electronics [12–14], conducting materials [15, 16], hydrogen storage [17, 18], chemical sensors [19–21] as well as drug carriers [22, 23], and so forth. Because of their high surface area and large micropore volume, CNTs are also considered as extremely good adsorbents [24]. To remove various different organic compounds from water with higher efficiency, CNTs have found their widespread applications in the adsorption [25–30]. Because NP pollutants are major byproducts formed in industrial processes, thus the potential industrial applications of CNTs as filter materials in water purification are highly appreciated. The adsorption of 4-chloro-2-nitrophenol (4C2NP) from aqueous solution was reported, and a maximum adsorption capacity of 1.44 and 4.42 mg·g-1 for SWNTs and MWNTs was obtained, respectively [31]. Copper and silver nanoparticles were immobilized on CNTs and embedded in water-insoluble cyclodextrin polyurethane polymers, which had a maximum adsorption of 55% ofpara-nitrophenol (PNP) [32]. Adsorption of PNP in aqueous solution from petrochemical wastewater by single-walled CNTs (SWNTs) and oxidized SWNTs (ox-SWNTs) was reported by Moradi et al., and these reports indicated that CNTs can be used as potential adsorbents for the treatment of wastewater containing nitrophenol.CNTs with different diameters would have different specific surface, which would affect their adsorptive properties. However, to the best of our knowledge, the effects of different outer diameters of CNTs on adsorption of organic contaminates were not investigated up to now. To clarify the outer diameters of CNTs on their adsorption capacity, PNP was selected as the sorption test molecule. And raw multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) of different outer diameters, various functionalized MWNTs (f-MWNTs), and oxidized SWNTs (ox-SWNTs) were used as adsorbents to investigate CNTs adsorption properties. The obtained results could offer some new insights into the relationship between the microstructures and adsorption properties of CNTs.


## 2. Experimental and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

The raw SWNTs (r.SWNTs) with external diameters of <2 nm used in this study were supplied by Nanjing Jcnano technology Co., LTD. The raw MWNTs (r.MWNTs) with external diameters of <10 nm, 10–20 nm, 10–30 nm, 20–40 nm, 40–60 nm, and 60–100 nm were bought from Shenzhen Nanotech Port Co., Ltd. As shown in Table1, the specific surface area of CNTs was estimated by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method according to the data provided by the vendors. Variousf-MWNTs were prepared and fully characterized by our group according to the literature methods. Other conventional reagents were of analytical grade and were used without further purification. The deionized water used in all experiments was prepared in a three-stage Millipore Milli-Q plus 185-purification system and had a resistivity higher than 18.2 MΩ.Table 1
The raw CNTs used in the experiments.
Type of CNTs
Main range of diameter
Length
Purity
Ash
Specific surface area
Amorphous carbon
Aligned MWNTs
10–30 nm
5–15μm
≥95%
≤0.2 wt%
160–200 m2/g
<3%
L.MWNTs-10
<10 nm
5–15μm
≥95%
≤0.2 wt%
250–500 m2/g
<3%
S.MWNTs-10
<10 nm
1-2μm
≥95%
≤0.2 wt%
250–500 m2/g
<3%
S.MWNTs-1030
10–30 nm
1-2μm
≥95%
≤0.2 wt%
100–160 m2/g
<3%
S.MWNTs-2040
20–40 nm
1-2μm
≥95%
≤0.2 wt%
70–150 m2/g
<3%
S.MWNTs-4060
40–60 nm
1-2μm
≥95%
≤0.2 wt%
60–120 m2/g
<3%
S.MWNTs-60100
60–100 nm
1-2μm
≥95%
≤0.2 wt%
40–70 m2/g
<3%
R.SWNTs
<2 nm
5–15μm
≥95%
≤0.2 wt%
500–700 m2/g
<5%
Notes: the acronym “L” is “long” and “S” is “short.” Therefore, the acronyms “L.MWNTs” and “S.MWNTs” are defined as long MWNTs and short MWNTs, respectively.


### 2.2. Functionalization of CNTs

Oxidized MWNTs (ox-MWNTs) were prepared by refluxing 100 mg of S.MWNTs-2040 in 25 mL concentrated nitric acid (HNO3) for 24 hrs [33, 34]. Brominated MWNTs (S.MWNT-Br) were obtained by heating r-S.MWNTs-2040 with liquid bromine at 55°C for 10 days [35–38]. Chitosan (CS) grafted MWNTs (S.MWNT-CS) were prepared by treating the ox-MWNTs with CS through a microwave-assisted reaction [39, 40]. The dihalocarbene functionalized MWNTs (S.MWNTs-2040-CCl2, S.MWNTs-2040-CBr2, and S.MWNTs-2040-CI2) were prepared by reaction of raw S.MWNTs-2040 with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) with chloroform, or bromoform, or iodoform, respectively [41–43]. And poly(ethylene glycol) (Mw=400; PEG400) grafted MWNTs (S.MWNT-PEG400) were obtained by firstly acyl chlorination of ox-MWNTs with thionyl chloride (SOCl2), followed by an esterification reaction with PEG400 [44–46]. All of the abovementioned functionalized CNTs were purified and fully characterized as demonstrated in the previous work [35–46].Oxidized SWNTs (ox-SWNTs) were prepared by treating SWNTs (200 mg) with HNO3/H2SO4 (volume ratio is 3 : 1, 60 mL) at 60°C for 6 hours [46, 47]. The mixture was then diluted with deionized water and filtered, and the residue was washed with large amount of deionized water until pH value of the filtrate was close to neutral. The residue was collected and dried under vacuum at 80°C for 48 hrs to obtain ox-SWNTs (187 mg).


### 2.3. Characterization

The microscopic morphologies of raw MWNTs (r.MWNTs), functionalized MWNTs (f-MWNTs), raw SWNTs (r.SWNTs), and ox-SWNTs were characterized using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). Drops of raw CNTs or CNT composites ethanol suspensions were delivered onto the copper grid and dried in air. Afterwards, the HRTEM images were acquired on a JEOL JEM-1230 microscope using an accelerating voltage of 100 kV.


### 2.4. Adsorption of PNP on the CNTs

Parallel series of batch adsorption tests were carried out as follows. In 25.00 mL Falcon centrifuge tubes, 0.0050 mg of various CNTs were introduced into 10.00 mL of solutions which contain a specific amount of PNP, respectively. The tubes were sonicated in water bath under a constant temperature for 30 min and then shaken for 0.5~6.0 h at 200 rpm on a horizontal shaker at room temperature. After shaking, the mixture was filtered using0.45μm polycarbonate membranes, and the obtained filtrates were also labelled as Aligned MWNTs (A.MWNTs), L.MWNTs-10, S.MWNTs-10, S.MWNTs-1030, S.MWNTs-2040, S.MWNTs-4060, S.MWNTs-60100, S.MWNTs-2040-Br, S.MWNTs-2040-CS, ox-MWNTs, ox-SWNTs, MWNTs-2040-PEG400, S.MWNTs-2040-CCl2, S.MWNTs-2040-CBr2, S.MWNTs-2040-CI2, and r.SWNTs, respectively. The PNP concentration was determined by UV-Vis spectrophotometry at a wavelength of 317 nm (Figure 1(a)). The amount of the adsorbed PNP on to abovementioned CNTs was calculated with
(1)qe=(C0-Ce)×Vm,
where qe is PNP adsorbed amount on the CNTs (mg·g-1); C0 and Ce are the initial and equilibrium concentrations of the PNP (mg·mL-1), respectively; V is the solution volume (mL); m is the CNTs’ dosage (g).Uv-vis spectrophotometry curves of PNP: (a) scanning curve and (b) standard curve.
(a)
(b)And the percentage removal (%R) of PNP was calculated with
(2)%R=C0-CeC0×100,
where C0 and Ce are the initial and equilibrium concentrations of the PNP (mg·mL−1), respectively.


### 2.5. Quantitative Analysis

We collected the absorption at different concentration of PNP and drew a diagram (Figure1(b)), which was then linearly fitted to gain the linear equation (3). The linearity of the calibration curve was rather good after correction, with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.99874 and R2 of 0.99698:
(3)Y=-0.03277+61.62929*X,
where X is the concentration of the PNP (mg·mL-1) and Y is the absorbance (a.u.).


## 2.1. Materials

The raw SWNTs (r.SWNTs) with external diameters of <2 nm used in this study were supplied by Nanjing Jcnano technology Co., LTD. The raw MWNTs (r.MWNTs) with external diameters of <10 nm, 10–20 nm, 10–30 nm, 20–40 nm, 40–60 nm, and 60–100 nm were bought from Shenzhen Nanotech Port Co., Ltd. As shown in Table1, the specific surface area of CNTs was estimated by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method according to the data provided by the vendors. Variousf-MWNTs were prepared and fully characterized by our group according to the literature methods. Other conventional reagents were of analytical grade and were used without further purification. The deionized water used in all experiments was prepared in a three-stage Millipore Milli-Q plus 185-purification system and had a resistivity higher than 18.2 MΩ.Table 1
The raw CNTs used in the experiments.
Type of CNTs
Main range of diameter
Length
Purity
Ash
Specific surface area
Amorphous carbon
Aligned MWNTs
10–30 nm
5–15μm
≥95%
≤0.2 wt%
160–200 m2/g
<3%
L.MWNTs-10
<10 nm
5–15μm
≥95%
≤0.2 wt%
250–500 m2/g
<3%
S.MWNTs-10
<10 nm
1-2μm
≥95%
≤0.2 wt%
250–500 m2/g
<3%
S.MWNTs-1030
10–30 nm
1-2μm
≥95%
≤0.2 wt%
100–160 m2/g
<3%
S.MWNTs-2040
20–40 nm
1-2μm
≥95%
≤0.2 wt%
70–150 m2/g
<3%
S.MWNTs-4060
40–60 nm
1-2μm
≥95%
≤0.2 wt%
60–120 m2/g
<3%
S.MWNTs-60100
60–100 nm
1-2μm
≥95%
≤0.2 wt%
40–70 m2/g
<3%
R.SWNTs
<2 nm
5–15μm
≥95%
≤0.2 wt%
500–700 m2/g
<5%
Notes: the acronym “L” is “long” and “S” is “short.” Therefore, the acronyms “L.MWNTs” and “S.MWNTs” are defined as long MWNTs and short MWNTs, respectively.


## 2.2. Functionalization of CNTs

Oxidized MWNTs (ox-MWNTs) were prepared by refluxing 100 mg of S.MWNTs-2040 in 25 mL concentrated nitric acid (HNO3) for 24 hrs [33, 34]. Brominated MWNTs (S.MWNT-Br) were obtained by heating r-S.MWNTs-2040 with liquid bromine at 55°C for 10 days [35–38]. Chitosan (CS) grafted MWNTs (S.MWNT-CS) were prepared by treating the ox-MWNTs with CS through a microwave-assisted reaction [39, 40]. The dihalocarbene functionalized MWNTs (S.MWNTs-2040-CCl2, S.MWNTs-2040-CBr2, and S.MWNTs-2040-CI2) were prepared by reaction of raw S.MWNTs-2040 with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) with chloroform, or bromoform, or iodoform, respectively [41–43]. And poly(ethylene glycol) (Mw=400; PEG400) grafted MWNTs (S.MWNT-PEG400) were obtained by firstly acyl chlorination of ox-MWNTs with thionyl chloride (SOCl2), followed by an esterification reaction with PEG400 [44–46]. All of the abovementioned functionalized CNTs were purified and fully characterized as demonstrated in the previous work [35–46].Oxidized SWNTs (ox-SWNTs) were prepared by treating SWNTs (200 mg) with HNO3/H2SO4 (volume ratio is 3 : 1, 60 mL) at 60°C for 6 hours [46, 47]. The mixture was then diluted with deionized water and filtered, and the residue was washed with large amount of deionized water until pH value of the filtrate was close to neutral. The residue was collected and dried under vacuum at 80°C for 48 hrs to obtain ox-SWNTs (187 mg).


## 2.3. Characterization

The microscopic morphologies of raw MWNTs (r.MWNTs), functionalized MWNTs (f-MWNTs), raw SWNTs (r.SWNTs), and ox-SWNTs were characterized using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). Drops of raw CNTs or CNT composites ethanol suspensions were delivered onto the copper grid and dried in air. Afterwards, the HRTEM images were acquired on a JEOL JEM-1230 microscope using an accelerating voltage of 100 kV.


## 2.4. Adsorption of PNP on the CNTs

Parallel series of batch adsorption tests were carried out as follows. In 25.00 mL Falcon centrifuge tubes, 0.0050 mg of various CNTs were introduced into 10.00 mL of solutions which contain a specific amount of PNP, respectively. The tubes were sonicated in water bath under a constant temperature for 30 min and then shaken for 0.5~6.0 h at 200 rpm on a horizontal shaker at room temperature. After shaking, the mixture was filtered using0.45μm polycarbonate membranes, and the obtained filtrates were also labelled as Aligned MWNTs (A.MWNTs), L.MWNTs-10, S.MWNTs-10, S.MWNTs-1030, S.MWNTs-2040, S.MWNTs-4060, S.MWNTs-60100, S.MWNTs-2040-Br, S.MWNTs-2040-CS, ox-MWNTs, ox-SWNTs, MWNTs-2040-PEG400, S.MWNTs-2040-CCl2, S.MWNTs-2040-CBr2, S.MWNTs-2040-CI2, and r.SWNTs, respectively. The PNP concentration was determined by UV-Vis spectrophotometry at a wavelength of 317 nm (Figure 1(a)). The amount of the adsorbed PNP on to abovementioned CNTs was calculated with
(1)qe=(C0-Ce)×Vm,
where qe is PNP adsorbed amount on the CNTs (mg·g-1); C0 and Ce are the initial and equilibrium concentrations of the PNP (mg·mL-1), respectively; V is the solution volume (mL); m is the CNTs’ dosage (g).Uv-vis spectrophotometry curves of PNP: (a) scanning curve and (b) standard curve.
(a)
(b)And the percentage removal (%R) of PNP was calculated with
(2)%R=C0-CeC0×100,
where C0 and Ce are the initial and equilibrium concentrations of the PNP (mg·mL−1), respectively.


## 2.5. Quantitative Analysis

We collected the absorption at different concentration of PNP and drew a diagram (Figure1(b)), which was then linearly fitted to gain the linear equation (3). The linearity of the calibration curve was rather good after correction, with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.99874 and R2 of 0.99698:
(3)Y=-0.03277+61.62929*X,
where X is the concentration of the PNP (mg·mL-1) and Y is the absorbance (a.u.).


## 3. Results and Discussions

### 3.1. Characterization of CNTs

All of the abovementioned functionalized CNTs were prepared using the same methods as demonstrated in the previous work by our group [33–37, 39–43]. Herein, only the morphologies/features and defects of CNT samples before and after functionalization were analyzed. HRTEM with very high spatial resolution was applied to characterize their microstructures. As shown in  Figures 2(b)-2(c), the diameters of CS or PEG400 modified MWNTs were enlarged a little (around 5~13 nm) due to the entangled polymers such as CS or PEG (marked by the arrows). Simultaneously, dihalocarbene modified MWNTs (including S.MWNTs-2040-CCl2, S.MWNTs-2040-CBr2, and S.MWNTs-2040-CI2) (Figures 2(d)–2(f)) and brominated MWNTs (S.MWNTs-2040-Br) (Figure 2(g)) largely preserve their morphologies/features in contrast with pristine MWNTs (S.MWNTs-2040) (Figure 2(a)). However, due to the formation of cyclopropane derivatives on the CNTs’ surface, the aromatic properties would be weakened a lot (Figure 3) [48–50]. And the introduction of -Br to CNTs would also weaken their aromatic properties [35, 37]. As for oxidized MWNTs (ox-MWNTs) (Figure 2(h)), CNTs would be broken under severe oxidation conditions by concentrated nitric acid [51]. Therefore, the ends of the tubes are opened, and thus the surface area of CNTs would be enlarged as a result.TEM images of MWNT samples: (a) S.MWNTs-2040; (b) S.MWNT-2040-CS; (c) S.MWNT-2040-PEG400; (d) S.MWNTs-2040-CCl2; (e) S.MWNTs-2040-CBr2; (f) S.MWNTs-2040-CI2; (g) S.MWNT-2040-Br; (h) ox-MWNTs.
(a)
S.MWNTs-2040
(b)
S.MWNT-2040-CS
(c)
S.MWNT-2040-PEG400
(d)
S.MWNTs-2040-CCl2
(e)
S.MWNTs-2040-CBr2
(f)
S.MWNTs-2040-CI2
(g)
S.MWNTs-2040-Br
(h)
ox-MWNTsFigure 3
Scheme of functionalization of CNTs by attachment of -CX2 (X = Cl, Br, I) or -Br, and oxidization of CNTs.As shown in Figure4, high-resolution TEM images of SWNT samples also clearly indicate that the defects of ox-SWNTs (Figure 4(b)) have emerged due to the severe oxidation for SWNTs (Figure 4(a)), which provides new sites for further modification of CNTs or adsorption of adsorbates (marked by the arrows).High-resolution TEM images of SWNT samples: (a) r.SWNTs and (b) ox-SWNTs.
(a)
r.SWNTs
(b)
ox-SWNTs


### 3.2. Effect of Kinds of CNTs on Removal of PNP

To evaluate the specific surface area of CNTs on removal of PNP, r.SWNTs and seven kinds of MWNTs including A.MWNTs, L.MWNTs-10, S.MWNTs-10, S.MWNTs-1030, S.MWNTs-2040, S.MWNTs-4060, and S.MWNTs-60100 were used as absorbents. As shown in Figure5(b), the percentage removal increased from 7.5% to around 80% when the diameters of MWNTs decrease from 60–100 nm to less than 10 nm. Obviously, the specific surface area of CNTs decreases along with the increased diameters (Table 1); thus their enhanced adsorption capacities might be based on the more possible surface sites for adsorption. When r.SWNTs with diameters of less than 2 nm were utilized, higher removal efficiency of over than 84% could be obtained (Figure 5(a)).Effect of kinds of CNTs on removal of PNP (C0=0.020mg·mL−1): (a) r.SWNTs and ox-SWNTs; (b) various MWNTs and their composites.
(a)
(b)In order to investigate the grafted organic ligands on the adsorption capacity of CNTs, ox-SWNTs and the S.MWNTs-2040 composites prepared by functionalizing S.MWNTs-2040 with -Br, -CS, -COOH, PEG400, -CCl2, -CBr2, and -CI2 (S.MWNTs-2040-Br, S.MWNTs-2040-CS, ox-MWNTs, S.MWNTs-2040-PEG400, S.MWNTs-2040-CCl2, S.MWNTs-2040-CBr2, and S.MWNTs-2040-CI2) were used to remove PNP. As shown in Figure 5, the removal efficiency was decreased by the S.MWNTs-2040 composites abovementioned in contrast with S.MWNTs-2040, indicating that functionalization is not an efficient way to enhance CNTs’ removal capacity. As a matter of fact, the removal efficiency off-MWNTs was decreased. Of all the possible reasons, the interaction between the adsorbates (PNP) and the adsorbents (f-MWNTs) would play vital roles. Firstly, it is well-known that CNTs would be coated with polymers during surface modification of CNTs with polymers [34–37] (Figures 2(b) and 2(c)); thus the effective adsorption sites for forming π-π interaction forces between the adsorbates (PNP) and the adsorbents (CNTs) would be decreased. Secondly, functionalization of S.MWNTs-2040 by grafting -CCl2, -CBr2, CI2, or -Br would damage their aromatic properties (Figure 3) by opening the double C=C bonds, and therefore the π-π interaction forces between PNP andf-MWNTs would also be decreased.Based on the reasons aforementioned, the oxidized CNTs, including ox-MWNTs and ox-SWNTs, would provide additional intermolecular forces such as hydrogen-bonding between PNP and CNTs due to the introduced hydroxyl, carbonyl, and carboxyl groups. In fact, the results indicated that the removal efficiency for PNP was increased by ox-MWNTs (19.5%) and ox-SWNTs (94.5%) in contrast with r.MWNTs (17.5%) and r.SWNTs (84.0%), respectively. Undoubtedly, the available sites on the adsorbents are the limiting factor for PNP adsorption and removal [52, 53].


### 3.3. Removal of PNP Using ox-SWNTs

#### 3.3.1. Effect of Initial PNP Concentration

To overcome all mass transfer resistance of the molecules between the aqueous phases (including PNP and H2O, especially adsorbate PNP) and the solid phase (adsorbent: SWNT-COOH), the initial concentration of PNP could provide an important driving force. Using ox-SWNTs as adsorbent, the effect of PNP concentrations (variation from 0.0050 to 0.0300 mg·mL-1) on the absorption was monitored. Increasing the initial concentrations led to an increase in the PNP percentage removal in the range of 0.005 to 0.0100 mg·mL-1. However, increasing the initial concentration would lead to a decrease in the PNP percentage removal in the range of 0.0100 to 0.0300 mg·mL-1 although the actual amount of PNP adsorbed per unit mass of adsorbents was increased (Figure 6). Therefore, the initial concentration of PNP provides an important driving force to overcome its mass transfer resistance between the aqueous and the solid phases. At an optimal initial concentration of 0.0100 mg·mL-1, the max PNP percentage removal was 97.9%.Figure 6
Effect of initial concentration on removal of PNP.


#### 3.3.2. Effect of Agitation Time

When the initial PNP concentration (C0) is 0.01000 mg·mL-1, the effects of agitation time on the sorption of PNP at room temperature are shown in Table 2. It can be seen from Table 2 that the amount of adsorbed PNP was almost the same when the agitation time was increased from 30 to 360 min. The adsorption rate is very fast because PNP might be mainly adsorbed on the exterior surface of SWNT-COOH. The percentage removal of PNP was close to 100%.Table 2
Effect of agitation time on removal of PNP.
Agitation time/min
C
e/mg·mL−1
Percentage removal
30
0.0001630
98.37%
90
0.0002810
97.19%
240
0.0002810
97.19%
360
0.0002980
97.02%In a usual adsorption process, initially adsorbate molecules diffuse from boundary layer film onto the adsorbent surface due to the boundary layer effects, and then they will diffuse into the porous structure of the adsorbent. However, the latter phenomenon will take a relatively longer contact time. As we can see from Table2, the absorption equilibrium was achieved after only 30 min. Therefore, the adsorption of PNP from its aqueous solution was a surface adsorption process. The PNP molecules would be mainly adsorbed by the external surface of ox-SWNTs, and scarcely any diffusion into the pores of CNTs would happen due to the very small holes of CNTs and the induced steric hindrance.


#### 3.3.3. Effect of Solution Temperature

By using 0.0100mg·mL-1 PNP as adsorption solution and 5.000 mg ox-SWNTs as adsorbents, when the adsorption was operated at 20, 25 30, 35, or 40°C, the percentage removal of PNP was obtained. As shown in Figure 7, one can see that the percentage removal of PNP decreased from 98.0% to 92.1% when the temperature increased from 20°C to 40°C. Therefore the adsorption process is exothermic.Figure 7
Effect of solution temperature on removal of PNP.


#### 3.3.4. The Maxim Adsorption Capacity

By using 500.0 mL of 0.0100mg·mL-1 PNP as adsorption solution, 5.000 mg ox-SWNTs as adsorbents, and then the solution was left standing for 24 h, the solution concentration of PNP was decreased to 0.00794 mg·mL-1 after adsorption, indicating a maxim adsorption capacity of 206 mg·g-1 for adsorption of PNP onto ox-SWNTs. The high adsorption capacity for PNP by ox-SWNTs could be ascribed to its high specific surface area, opened tubular ends, and introduced hydroxyl, carbonyl, and carboxyl groups.


#### 3.3.5. Desorption Ability

To analyze the desorption capacity of PNP from ox-SWNTs, the ox-SWNT samples obtained from the maxim adsorption capacity test were then dispersed in 50 mL ethyl acetate and oscillate for 24 h at room temperature. The solution concentration of PNP was increased to 0.00646 mg/mL after desorption, indicating that about 31.4% desorption amount could be achieved.


## 3.1. Characterization of CNTs

All of the abovementioned functionalized CNTs were prepared using the same methods as demonstrated in the previous work by our group [33–37, 39–43]. Herein, only the morphologies/features and defects of CNT samples before and after functionalization were analyzed. HRTEM with very high spatial resolution was applied to characterize their microstructures. As shown in  Figures 2(b)-2(c), the diameters of CS or PEG400 modified MWNTs were enlarged a little (around 5~13 nm) due to the entangled polymers such as CS or PEG (marked by the arrows). Simultaneously, dihalocarbene modified MWNTs (including S.MWNTs-2040-CCl2, S.MWNTs-2040-CBr2, and S.MWNTs-2040-CI2) (Figures 2(d)–2(f)) and brominated MWNTs (S.MWNTs-2040-Br) (Figure 2(g)) largely preserve their morphologies/features in contrast with pristine MWNTs (S.MWNTs-2040) (Figure 2(a)). However, due to the formation of cyclopropane derivatives on the CNTs’ surface, the aromatic properties would be weakened a lot (Figure 3) [48–50]. And the introduction of -Br to CNTs would also weaken their aromatic properties [35, 37]. As for oxidized MWNTs (ox-MWNTs) (Figure 2(h)), CNTs would be broken under severe oxidation conditions by concentrated nitric acid [51]. Therefore, the ends of the tubes are opened, and thus the surface area of CNTs would be enlarged as a result.TEM images of MWNT samples: (a) S.MWNTs-2040; (b) S.MWNT-2040-CS; (c) S.MWNT-2040-PEG400; (d) S.MWNTs-2040-CCl2; (e) S.MWNTs-2040-CBr2; (f) S.MWNTs-2040-CI2; (g) S.MWNT-2040-Br; (h) ox-MWNTs.
(a)
S.MWNTs-2040
(b)
S.MWNT-2040-CS
(c)
S.MWNT-2040-PEG400
(d)
S.MWNTs-2040-CCl2
(e)
S.MWNTs-2040-CBr2
(f)
S.MWNTs-2040-CI2
(g)
S.MWNTs-2040-Br
(h)
ox-MWNTsFigure 3
Scheme of functionalization of CNTs by attachment of -CX2 (X = Cl, Br, I) or -Br, and oxidization of CNTs.As shown in Figure4, high-resolution TEM images of SWNT samples also clearly indicate that the defects of ox-SWNTs (Figure 4(b)) have emerged due to the severe oxidation for SWNTs (Figure 4(a)), which provides new sites for further modification of CNTs or adsorption of adsorbates (marked by the arrows).High-resolution TEM images of SWNT samples: (a) r.SWNTs and (b) ox-SWNTs.
(a)
r.SWNTs
(b)
ox-SWNTs


## 3.2. Effect of Kinds of CNTs on Removal of PNP

To evaluate the specific surface area of CNTs on removal of PNP, r.SWNTs and seven kinds of MWNTs including A.MWNTs, L.MWNTs-10, S.MWNTs-10, S.MWNTs-1030, S.MWNTs-2040, S.MWNTs-4060, and S.MWNTs-60100 were used as absorbents. As shown in Figure5(b), the percentage removal increased from 7.5% to around 80% when the diameters of MWNTs decrease from 60–100 nm to less than 10 nm. Obviously, the specific surface area of CNTs decreases along with the increased diameters (Table 1); thus their enhanced adsorption capacities might be based on the more possible surface sites for adsorption. When r.SWNTs with diameters of less than 2 nm were utilized, higher removal efficiency of over than 84% could be obtained (Figure 5(a)).Effect of kinds of CNTs on removal of PNP (C0=0.020mg·mL−1): (a) r.SWNTs and ox-SWNTs; (b) various MWNTs and their composites.
(a)
(b)In order to investigate the grafted organic ligands on the adsorption capacity of CNTs, ox-SWNTs and the S.MWNTs-2040 composites prepared by functionalizing S.MWNTs-2040 with -Br, -CS, -COOH, PEG400, -CCl2, -CBr2, and -CI2 (S.MWNTs-2040-Br, S.MWNTs-2040-CS, ox-MWNTs, S.MWNTs-2040-PEG400, S.MWNTs-2040-CCl2, S.MWNTs-2040-CBr2, and S.MWNTs-2040-CI2) were used to remove PNP. As shown in Figure 5, the removal efficiency was decreased by the S.MWNTs-2040 composites abovementioned in contrast with S.MWNTs-2040, indicating that functionalization is not an efficient way to enhance CNTs’ removal capacity. As a matter of fact, the removal efficiency off-MWNTs was decreased. Of all the possible reasons, the interaction between the adsorbates (PNP) and the adsorbents (f-MWNTs) would play vital roles. Firstly, it is well-known that CNTs would be coated with polymers during surface modification of CNTs with polymers [34–37] (Figures 2(b) and 2(c)); thus the effective adsorption sites for forming π-π interaction forces between the adsorbates (PNP) and the adsorbents (CNTs) would be decreased. Secondly, functionalization of S.MWNTs-2040 by grafting -CCl2, -CBr2, CI2, or -Br would damage their aromatic properties (Figure 3) by opening the double C=C bonds, and therefore the π-π interaction forces between PNP andf-MWNTs would also be decreased.Based on the reasons aforementioned, the oxidized CNTs, including ox-MWNTs and ox-SWNTs, would provide additional intermolecular forces such as hydrogen-bonding between PNP and CNTs due to the introduced hydroxyl, carbonyl, and carboxyl groups. In fact, the results indicated that the removal efficiency for PNP was increased by ox-MWNTs (19.5%) and ox-SWNTs (94.5%) in contrast with r.MWNTs (17.5%) and r.SWNTs (84.0%), respectively. Undoubtedly, the available sites on the adsorbents are the limiting factor for PNP adsorption and removal [52, 53].


## 3.3. Removal of PNP Using ox-SWNTs

### 3.3.1. Effect of Initial PNP Concentration

To overcome all mass transfer resistance of the molecules between the aqueous phases (including PNP and H2O, especially adsorbate PNP) and the solid phase (adsorbent: SWNT-COOH), the initial concentration of PNP could provide an important driving force. Using ox-SWNTs as adsorbent, the effect of PNP concentrations (variation from 0.0050 to 0.0300 mg·mL-1) on the absorption was monitored. Increasing the initial concentrations led to an increase in the PNP percentage removal in the range of 0.005 to 0.0100 mg·mL-1. However, increasing the initial concentration would lead to a decrease in the PNP percentage removal in the range of 0.0100 to 0.0300 mg·mL-1 although the actual amount of PNP adsorbed per unit mass of adsorbents was increased (Figure 6). Therefore, the initial concentration of PNP provides an important driving force to overcome its mass transfer resistance between the aqueous and the solid phases. At an optimal initial concentration of 0.0100 mg·mL-1, the max PNP percentage removal was 97.9%.Figure 6
Effect of initial concentration on removal of PNP.


### 3.3.2. Effect of Agitation Time

When the initial PNP concentration (C0) is 0.01000 mg·mL-1, the effects of agitation time on the sorption of PNP at room temperature are shown in Table 2. It can be seen from Table 2 that the amount of adsorbed PNP was almost the same when the agitation time was increased from 30 to 360 min. The adsorption rate is very fast because PNP might be mainly adsorbed on the exterior surface of SWNT-COOH. The percentage removal of PNP was close to 100%.Table 2
Effect of agitation time on removal of PNP.
Agitation time/min
C
e/mg·mL−1
Percentage removal
30
0.0001630
98.37%
90
0.0002810
97.19%
240
0.0002810
97.19%
360
0.0002980
97.02%In a usual adsorption process, initially adsorbate molecules diffuse from boundary layer film onto the adsorbent surface due to the boundary layer effects, and then they will diffuse into the porous structure of the adsorbent. However, the latter phenomenon will take a relatively longer contact time. As we can see from Table2, the absorption equilibrium was achieved after only 30 min. Therefore, the adsorption of PNP from its aqueous solution was a surface adsorption process. The PNP molecules would be mainly adsorbed by the external surface of ox-SWNTs, and scarcely any diffusion into the pores of CNTs would happen due to the very small holes of CNTs and the induced steric hindrance.


### 3.3.3. Effect of Solution Temperature

By using 0.0100mg·mL-1 PNP as adsorption solution and 5.000 mg ox-SWNTs as adsorbents, when the adsorption was operated at 20, 25 30, 35, or 40°C, the percentage removal of PNP was obtained. As shown in Figure 7, one can see that the percentage removal of PNP decreased from 98.0% to 92.1% when the temperature increased from 20°C to 40°C. Therefore the adsorption process is exothermic.Figure 7
Effect of solution temperature on removal of PNP.


### 3.3.4. The Maxim Adsorption Capacity

By using 500.0 mL of 0.0100mg·mL-1 PNP as adsorption solution, 5.000 mg ox-SWNTs as adsorbents, and then the solution was left standing for 24 h, the solution concentration of PNP was decreased to 0.00794 mg·mL-1 after adsorption, indicating a maxim adsorption capacity of 206 mg·g-1 for adsorption of PNP onto ox-SWNTs. The high adsorption capacity for PNP by ox-SWNTs could be ascribed to its high specific surface area, opened tubular ends, and introduced hydroxyl, carbonyl, and carboxyl groups.


### 3.3.5. Desorption Ability

To analyze the desorption capacity of PNP from ox-SWNTs, the ox-SWNT samples obtained from the maxim adsorption capacity test were then dispersed in 50 mL ethyl acetate and oscillate for 24 h at room temperature. The solution concentration of PNP was increased to 0.00646 mg/mL after desorption, indicating that about 31.4% desorption amount could be achieved.


## 3.3.1. Effect of Initial PNP Concentration

To overcome all mass transfer resistance of the molecules between the aqueous phases (including PNP and H2O, especially adsorbate PNP) and the solid phase (adsorbent: SWNT-COOH), the initial concentration of PNP could provide an important driving force. Using ox-SWNTs as adsorbent, the effect of PNP concentrations (variation from 0.0050 to 0.0300 mg·mL-1) on the absorption was monitored. Increasing the initial concentrations led to an increase in the PNP percentage removal in the range of 0.005 to 0.0100 mg·mL-1. However, increasing the initial concentration would lead to a decrease in the PNP percentage removal in the range of 0.0100 to 0.0300 mg·mL-1 although the actual amount of PNP adsorbed per unit mass of adsorbents was increased (Figure 6). Therefore, the initial concentration of PNP provides an important driving force to overcome its mass transfer resistance between the aqueous and the solid phases. At an optimal initial concentration of 0.0100 mg·mL-1, the max PNP percentage removal was 97.9%.Figure 6
Effect of initial concentration on removal of PNP.


## 3.3.2. Effect of Agitation Time

When the initial PNP concentration (C0) is 0.01000 mg·mL-1, the effects of agitation time on the sorption of PNP at room temperature are shown in Table 2. It can be seen from Table 2 that the amount of adsorbed PNP was almost the same when the agitation time was increased from 30 to 360 min. The adsorption rate is very fast because PNP might be mainly adsorbed on the exterior surface of SWNT-COOH. The percentage removal of PNP was close to 100%.Table 2
Effect of agitation time on removal of PNP.
Agitation time/min
C
e/mg·mL−1
Percentage removal
30
0.0001630
98.37%
90
0.0002810
97.19%
240
0.0002810
97.19%
360
0.0002980
97.02%In a usual adsorption process, initially adsorbate molecules diffuse from boundary layer film onto the adsorbent surface due to the boundary layer effects, and then they will diffuse into the porous structure of the adsorbent. However, the latter phenomenon will take a relatively longer contact time. As we can see from Table2, the absorption equilibrium was achieved after only 30 min. Therefore, the adsorption of PNP from its aqueous solution was a surface adsorption process. The PNP molecules would be mainly adsorbed by the external surface of ox-SWNTs, and scarcely any diffusion into the pores of CNTs would happen due to the very small holes of CNTs and the induced steric hindrance.


## 3.3.3. Effect of Solution Temperature

By using 0.0100mg·mL-1 PNP as adsorption solution and 5.000 mg ox-SWNTs as adsorbents, when the adsorption was operated at 20, 25 30, 35, or 40°C, the percentage removal of PNP was obtained. As shown in Figure 7, one can see that the percentage removal of PNP decreased from 98.0% to 92.1% when the temperature increased from 20°C to 40°C. Therefore the adsorption process is exothermic.Figure 7
Effect of solution temperature on removal of PNP.


## 3.3.4. The Maxim Adsorption Capacity

By using 500.0 mL of 0.0100mg·mL-1 PNP as adsorption solution, 5.000 mg ox-SWNTs as adsorbents, and then the solution was left standing for 24 h, the solution concentration of PNP was decreased to 0.00794 mg·mL-1 after adsorption, indicating a maxim adsorption capacity of 206 mg·g-1 for adsorption of PNP onto ox-SWNTs. The high adsorption capacity for PNP by ox-SWNTs could be ascribed to its high specific surface area, opened tubular ends, and introduced hydroxyl, carbonyl, and carboxyl groups.


## 3.3.5. Desorption Ability

To analyze the desorption capacity of PNP from ox-SWNTs, the ox-SWNT samples obtained from the maxim adsorption capacity test were then dispersed in 50 mL ethyl acetate and oscillate for 24 h at room temperature. The solution concentration of PNP was increased to 0.00646 mg/mL after desorption, indicating that about 31.4% desorption amount could be achieved.


## 4. Conclusions

Our results highlight the significance of CNTs’ surface area for contaminant adsorption and the associated influence of grafted molecules on adsorption. From the experimental results, covalent functionalization of CNTs by attachment of polar molecules or groups would weaken their aromatic properties and decrease their surface area, and therefore their adsorption capacity would decrease. However, oxidization could open CNTs and introduce hydroxyl group, carbonyl group, and carbonyl group; thus their adsorption capacity would increase due to CNTs’ magnified surface area and emerging hydrogen bonds between oxidized CNTs and adsorbates. The adsorption process for removing PNP is exothermic due to the decreased removal efficiency along with increased temperature.



---

*Source: 571745-2014-07-02.xml*