# Shape-Controlled Generation of Gold Nanoparticles Assisted by Dual-Molecules: The Development of Hydrogen Peroxide and Oxidase-Based Biosensors

Authors: Chifang Peng; Xiaohui Duan; Zhengjun Xie; Chunli Liu
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

With the assist of dual-molecules, 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES) and sodium citrate, gold nanoparticles (GNPs) with different shapes can be generated in the H2O2-mediated reduction of chloroauric acid. This one-pot reaction can be employed to sensitively detect H2O2, probe substrates or enzymes in oxidase-based reactions as well as prepare branched GNPs controllably. By the “naked eye,” 20 μM H2O2, 0.1 μM glucose, and 0.26 U/mL catalase could be differentiated, respectively. By spectrophotometer, the detected limits of H2O2, glucose, and catalase were 1.0 μM, 0.01 μM, and 0.03 U/mL, respectively, and the detection linear ranges for them were 5.0–400 μM, 0.01–0.3 mM, and 0.03–0.78 U/mL, respectively. The proposed “dual-molecules assist” strategy probably paves a new way for the fabrication of nanosensors based on the growth of anisotropic metal nanoparticles, and the developed catalase sensor can probably be utilized to fabricate ultrasensitive ELISA methods for various analytes.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) possess distinct physical and chemical attributes that make them excellent scaffolds for the fabrication of novel chemical and biological sensors [1]. Interestingly, some unique sensors based on GNP enlargement of GNP seeds have been developed, such as colorimetric sensors for enzymes and substrates in biocatalyzed reactions [2] and light scattering signal enhancer in scanometric immunoassay [3]. Recently, the generation of GNPs has also been utilized to develop some novel sensors, such as chemiluminescence sensor based on DNA structure catalyzing the formation of GNPs [4] that produce gold nanoshells for detecting hydrogen peroxide scavenging activity [5] and liquid crystal biosensors based on enzymatic deposition of GNPs [6].The accurate and rapid determination of H2O2 is of practical importance due to its application in food, pharmaceutical, clinical, industrial, and environmental analysis [5, 7]; H2O2 is generally acknowledged to be an oxidative agent. However, it has been reported to be able to reduce HAuCl4 to synthesize AuNPs in a broad pH range [8]. Recently, de la Rica et al. described a visual H2O2 sensor, based on which an ultrasensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for prostate specific antigen was developed. The above visual H2O2 sensor was based on H2O2-mediated generation of GNPs in MES buffer. An abrupt change in the solution color from red to blue happened when the concentration of H2O2 was under a cut-off value [9, 10]. Nevertheless, this novel method cannot be utilized to quantitatively detect targets. It also should be noted that gold precursors have to be prepared first by using MES as a reducing agent in this method [11]. In this step, unstable GNPs aggregates are easily produced [12], which will bring about difficulty and inconvenience in practical applications. Since the stability of GNPs is affected by many factors, such as reducing agents, surfactants [13], the above H2O2 sensor based on GNPs generation probably can be improved by adjusting these additives.Herein, we utilized dual-molecules, sodium citrate (Na3Cit) and MES, to control the generation of GNPs in the H2O2-mediated reduction of AuCl4-. It was found that this H2O2-mediated GNPs generation can be utilized to qualitatively detect H2O2 and prepare branched GNPs. Based on the above discovery, a sensitive and simple H2O2 sensor by the naked eye was developed. Catalase and glucose were taken as examples to show the applications of this H2O2 sensor.


## 2. Experimental Section

Reagents. The reagents, HAuCl4, sodium citrate, MES, and catalase (C1345), were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Glucose and GOD (G109029) were purchased from Aladdin Reagent Company (Shanghai). High-purity water (Milli-Q water) was used throughout the experiments. All other reagents are of analytical grade unless otherwise stated.Effects of Buffers on the Generation of GNP Solutions. 3 μL of HAuCl4 (30 mM), 6 μL of Na3Cit (80 mM) were mixed thoroughly with 91 μL MES (2.0 mM, pH 6.5), phosphate buffer (2.0 mM, pH 6.5) or tris-(hydroxymethyl)aminoethane buffer (Tris, 2.0 mM, pH 6.5) buffer (2.0 mM, pH = 6.5), were mixed thoroughly; then 100 μL of H2O2 was added and incubated at ambient temperature for 10 min. Na3Cit or MES was replaced by the same volume of ultrapurified water in the above reaction to investigate their effects. In addition, varied concentrations of Na3Cit (20, 40, 80, and 120 mM) were compared in the above reaction system with HAuCl4, MES, and H2O2.Characterization of GNPs. Absorbance spectra were measured by microplate spectrophotometer (Bio-Tek PowerWave XS). Size distribution and zeta potential of GNPs were measured by Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern) after the GNPs were produced within 15 min. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained using JEOL JEM-2100 operating at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV.Detection of H
2
O
2
. In a representative procedure, 3 μL of HAuCl4 (20 mM), 6 μL of Na3Cit (40 mM), and 91 μL of MES buffer (2.0 mM, pH = 6.5) were mixed thoroughly; then 100 μL of H2O2 was added. After incubating at ambient temperature for 10 min, absorbance spectra were recorded.Detection of Catalase. 50 μL of catalase (0–40 nM) and 50 μL of H2O2 (400 μM) were mixed and incubated at ambient temperature for 20 min. Then the reaction solutions were added into the mixture of 3 μL of HAuCl4 (20 mM), 6 μL of Na3Cit (40 mM), and 91 μL of MES (2.0 mM, pH 6.5). After incubating for another 10 min, absorbance spectra were recorded.Detection of Glucose. 50 μL of GOx (50 μg/mL) and 50 μL of glucose (0–30 mM) were mixed first and incubated at ambient temperature for 20 min. Then the reaction solutions were added into the mixture of 3 μL of HAuCl4 (20 mM), 6 μL of Na3Cit (40 mM), and 91 μL of MES (2.0 mM, pH 6.5). After incubating for another 10 min, absorbance spectra were recorded.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Development of H2O2 Sensor

Usually, MES can reduce HAuCl4 and produce a blue color [12]. After H2O2 was added to the mixture of MES and HAuCl4, only high concentration of H2O2 (200 μM) could be differentiated by the naked eye (Figure 1(a)). The absorbance intensity of the GNPs solution increased with the increasing concentration of H2O2 in a very narrow range of 100–400 μM (Figure 1(b)). Thus, the reaction was substoichiometric and not sensitive for sensing H2O2 mainly due to the formed unstable aggregated gold nanostructures (See Figure S1 at Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/576082). As expected, sodium citrate (Na3Cit) can act as stabilizer to improve the sensing performance against H2O2. With the addition of Na3Cit (20 mM) into MES-AuCl4- solution, the MES-Na3Cit-AuCl4- reaction solution without H2O2 became colorless. The result shows that Na3Cit can act as an “inhibitor” of the reduction of AuCl4- by MES to some extent. As a result, 20 μM H2O2 could be differentiated by the naked eye (Figure 1(a)). More importantly, the color of GNPs deepened gradually as the concentration of H2O2 increased in the range of 0–600 μM. This result was consistent with the nearly linear plot of the absorbance values of the produced GNPs solutions versus H2O2 concentrations in the range from 0 μM to 600 μM (Figure 1(b)). Interestingly, Na3Cit also can assist the H2O2-mediated reduction of AuCl4- although the reduction is very weak (Figures 1(a)-1(b)). H2O2 cannot reduce AuCl4- into GNPs in other common buffers containing Na3Cit, such as phosphate buffer or tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane buffer (Figure 1(a)). The above comparison suggests that MES and Na3Cit together can work synergistically, leading to a more specific reduction of AuCl4- by H2O2 than only MES.GNP solutions generated in different buffers. (a) Photograph showing the reaction solution. (b) Absorbance values (540 nm) of GNP solutions as a function of H2O2 concentration. Reaction condition: (A) 0.45 mM HAuCl4 and 1.0 mM MES (pH = 6.5); (B) 0.45 mM HAuCl4, 2.4 mM sodium citrate, and 1.0 mM MES (pH = 6.5); (C) 0.45 mM HAuCl4, 2.4 mM sodium citrate, and water; (D) 0.45 mM HAuCl4, 2.4 mM sodium citrate, and 1.0 mM PB (pH = 6.5); (E) 0.45 mM HAuCl4, 2.4 mM sodium citrate, and 1.0 mM Tris (pH = 6.5).
(a)
(b)Na3Cit can stabilize the GNPs generated to some extent because the produced GNPs in the AuCl4-/MES/H2O2 reaction became smaller after adding 0.4 mM Na3Cit. When 400 μM H2O2 was added into HAuCl4-MES-Na3Cit solution, the average hydrodynamic diameter of produced GNPs was 49 nm, while the bigger GNPs (mean hydrodynamic diameter = 108 nm) assembled by smaller GNPs were obtained in the absence of Na3Cit (Figure S1). With the added Na3Cit being increased from 40 mM to 120 mM, the produced GNPs showed almost the same color and the plots of the absorbance intensity versus H2O2 concentration highly overlapped (Figure S2). But after decreasing the concentration of Na3Cit to 10 mM, the absorbance intensity corresponding to 400 μM H2O2 became occasionally lower than that corresponding to 200 μM. This result is due to the fact that the produced high concentration of GNPs solution does not have enough Na3Cit and easily forms aggregate. Since the pH value and concentration of MES probably change the reduction ability of MES, we varied the pH value and concentration of MES to choose the best pH and concentration of MES. The best pH value was found to be 6.5 (Figure S3). The MES concentration also affects the performance of the above H2O2 sensor probably due to the changed ratio of MES to Na3Cit (Figure S4).In a representative condition, GNPs solutions with different tonality could be obtained depending on the concentration of H2O2 (Figure 2(a)). Light blue solutions corresponding to lower concentration of H2O2 (20–100 μM) were obtained, and purple to wine red solutions corresponding to higher concentration of H2O2 (200–600 μM) were produced. As a result, 20 μM H2O2 can be detected by the naked eye. Colorimetric assay showed that the maximum absorbance values increased and the GNPs surface plasmon resonance (SPR) peak blue-shifted from 560 nm to 540 nm as the concentration of H2O2 increased (Figure 2(b)). The blueshift of SPR peak in this system was opposite to the redshift usually observed in seed-mediated gold enlargement systems [2, 5]. After the concentration of H2O2 decreased to 100 μM, obviously broadening of the SPR peaks was observed. This abrupt change of SPR peaks was consistent with the change of red color to light blue color.Generation of GNP solutions with different colors depends on the concentration of H2O2. (a) Photograph showing the generation of nanoparticle solutions with different colors and intensities after 10 min. (b) Absorbance spectra of GNPs generated with different concentration of H2O2. From bottom to up: 0, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 600 μM.
(a)
(b)Because MES (1.0 mM) was excessive toAuCl4- (0.45 mM) while H2O2 (0–400 μM) was insufficient to reduce all the AuCl4-, the AuNPs generation probably changed after H2O2 was consumed completely. However, it was found that the AuNPs generation reached a plateau after 10 minutes and then the developed color changed very slowly. After the color developing for 60 min, 25 μM H2O2 still can be differentiated by the naked eye (Figure 3(a)) and 5 μM H2O2 by spectrophotometry (Figure 3(b)). These results demonstrate that this one-pot reaction has a wide window for analysis of H2O2, which can facilitate practical applications. When H2O2 was detected by a spectrophotometer, a linear range of 2–400 μM (R2=99.6%) was obtained and the detection limit (S/N=3) is evaluated as 0.5 μM (Figure 4). The sensitivity of the developed method here is higher or comparable with that of some other nanoparticle-based colorimetric H2O2 sensors [7, 14, 15].H2O2 (0–400 μM) reduction of GNPs over time: (A) 0 μM, (B) 5 μM, (C) 12.5 μM, (D) 25 μM, (E) 50 μM, (F) 100 μM, (G) 200 μM, and (H) 400 μM H2O2.
(a)
(b)Figure 4
Calibration curve for quantitative detection of H2O2. H2O2 reduction of GNPs kept for 10 min. The error bars represent standard derivations.To further understand the interesting property of this visual H2O2 sensor, we observed the shapes of the GNPs reduced by the different concentration of H2O2. Branched GNPs comprising branched nanocrystals with about 10 nm dimension were found by the reduction of 100 μM H2O2 (Figures 5(a)–5(e)). GNP dimers comprising 20–25 nm branches can be found by the reduction of 400 μM H2O2 (Figure 5(f)), while dispersed quasi-spherical GNPs in the dimension of 30–40 nm can be found by the reduction of 600 μM H2O2 (Figure 5(g)). This finding is probably useful in controllable synthesis of branched GNPs, which is very useful for the fabrication of nanosensors, multiple-terminal devices, and so forth [16].TEM images of GNPs generated with varied H2O2 concentrations: (a–e) 100 μM H2O2, (f) 400 μM H2O2, and (g) 600 μM H2O2.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)The entirely different shapes of GNPs generated in the presence of varied concentrations of H2O2 suggest that two processes at least will happen in this MES-Na3Cit-AuCl4--H2O2 reaction (Scheme 1). One process involves the reduction of AulCl4- by MES. Since, with the addition of Na3Cit and in the absence of H2O2, MES still produced weak reduction of AuCl4-, MES can act like an “initiator” (Figure 1(b)). MES also functions like other zwitterionic molecules under certain conditions since many Good’s buffers can serve as shape-directing agents in synthesis of branched gold nanocrystals [16]. Another process involves the reduction of AulCl4- by MES, which mainly depends on the reduction of AuCl4- by H2O2. With the addition of increased H2O2, the enlargement of gold nanoparticles gradually overwhelms the generation of the branched gold nanocrystals.Scheme 1
Cartoon of the generation of different shapes of GNPs.Detection of Glucose. Numerous oxidases can produce H2O2 upon the oxidation of the respective substrates by O2. It suggests that this AuCl4-/MES/Na3Cit system can probably be employed as an effective tool for the visual sensing of oxidases and their substrates. We have applied this system to detect glucose by using glucose oxidase (GOD) and glucose/O2 as H2O2 producing system. Figure 6(a) shows the visual detection results of glucose in this reaction system. The solution color deepened gradually as the glucose concentration was increased. Light blue solution was produced corresponding to 0.03–0.1 mM glucose while purple solution was produced corresponding to 0.3–1.0 mM glucose. After glucose concentration increased to above 3.0 mM, the produced solutions changed to bright red wine. This color change can be distinguished clearly by the naked eye. This sensitivity is comparable with the method reported recently but shows more distinguishable and controllable color development model [17]. Figure 6(b) showed that the absorbance intensity of reaction solutions increased gradually as the glucose concentration increased. The detection limit of 0.01 mM glucose (S/N=3) and linear range from 0.01 to 0.3 mM were obtained by spectrophotometry (Figure 6(b)). The sensitivity is higher than or comparable with that of the colorimetric methods recently reported [7, 14, 17, 18].Generation of nanoparticle solutions with different colors depends on the concentration of glucose. (a) Photograph showing the generation of GNP solutions with different colors and intensities. (b) Plots of absorbance values of GNP solutions against the concentration of glucose. Inset: linear relationship between absorbance values and glucose concentrations.
(a)
(b)Detection of Catalase. Catalase is very important enzyme in protecting the cell from oxidative damage by reactive oxygen species. Catalase is also a key indicator of mastitis disease in milk [19, 20]. Thus, facile detection catalase will be useful in many fields. Since catalase can decompose H2O2 efficiently, coupling this decomposition with the above AuCl4-/MES/Na3Cit reaction can probably be utilized to probe the activity of catalase. As expected, the performance adverse to that of the above H2O2 detection was found (Figure 7(a)). As the concentration of catalase increased from 0.03 U/mL to 21.0 U/mL, different solution colors from wine red and purple to light blue were demonstrated. By the naked eye, 0.3 U/mL of catalase can be clearly distinguished. In addition, the detection limit of 0.026 U/mL catalase (S/N=3) can be achieved by spectrophotometry (Figure 7(b)). The sensitivity of the “naked eye” or colorimetric methods developed here is higher than the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) method [20] and amperometric biosensor reported recently [19] or comparable with that of some expensive commercial available kits for catalase detection.Generation of nanoparticle solutions with different colors depends on the concentration of catalase. (a) Photograph showing the generation of GNP solutions with different colors and intensities. (b) Plots of absorbance values of GNP solutions against the concentration of catalase. Inset: linear relationship between absorbance values and catalase concentrations.
(a)
(b)


## 3.1. Development of H2O2 Sensor

Usually, MES can reduce HAuCl4 and produce a blue color [12]. After H2O2 was added to the mixture of MES and HAuCl4, only high concentration of H2O2 (200 μM) could be differentiated by the naked eye (Figure 1(a)). The absorbance intensity of the GNPs solution increased with the increasing concentration of H2O2 in a very narrow range of 100–400 μM (Figure 1(b)). Thus, the reaction was substoichiometric and not sensitive for sensing H2O2 mainly due to the formed unstable aggregated gold nanostructures (See Figure S1 at Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/576082). As expected, sodium citrate (Na3Cit) can act as stabilizer to improve the sensing performance against H2O2. With the addition of Na3Cit (20 mM) into MES-AuCl4- solution, the MES-Na3Cit-AuCl4- reaction solution without H2O2 became colorless. The result shows that Na3Cit can act as an “inhibitor” of the reduction of AuCl4- by MES to some extent. As a result, 20 μM H2O2 could be differentiated by the naked eye (Figure 1(a)). More importantly, the color of GNPs deepened gradually as the concentration of H2O2 increased in the range of 0–600 μM. This result was consistent with the nearly linear plot of the absorbance values of the produced GNPs solutions versus H2O2 concentrations in the range from 0 μM to 600 μM (Figure 1(b)). Interestingly, Na3Cit also can assist the H2O2-mediated reduction of AuCl4- although the reduction is very weak (Figures 1(a)-1(b)). H2O2 cannot reduce AuCl4- into GNPs in other common buffers containing Na3Cit, such as phosphate buffer or tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane buffer (Figure 1(a)). The above comparison suggests that MES and Na3Cit together can work synergistically, leading to a more specific reduction of AuCl4- by H2O2 than only MES.GNP solutions generated in different buffers. (a) Photograph showing the reaction solution. (b) Absorbance values (540 nm) of GNP solutions as a function of H2O2 concentration. Reaction condition: (A) 0.45 mM HAuCl4 and 1.0 mM MES (pH = 6.5); (B) 0.45 mM HAuCl4, 2.4 mM sodium citrate, and 1.0 mM MES (pH = 6.5); (C) 0.45 mM HAuCl4, 2.4 mM sodium citrate, and water; (D) 0.45 mM HAuCl4, 2.4 mM sodium citrate, and 1.0 mM PB (pH = 6.5); (E) 0.45 mM HAuCl4, 2.4 mM sodium citrate, and 1.0 mM Tris (pH = 6.5).
(a)
(b)Na3Cit can stabilize the GNPs generated to some extent because the produced GNPs in the AuCl4-/MES/H2O2 reaction became smaller after adding 0.4 mM Na3Cit. When 400 μM H2O2 was added into HAuCl4-MES-Na3Cit solution, the average hydrodynamic diameter of produced GNPs was 49 nm, while the bigger GNPs (mean hydrodynamic diameter = 108 nm) assembled by smaller GNPs were obtained in the absence of Na3Cit (Figure S1). With the added Na3Cit being increased from 40 mM to 120 mM, the produced GNPs showed almost the same color and the plots of the absorbance intensity versus H2O2 concentration highly overlapped (Figure S2). But after decreasing the concentration of Na3Cit to 10 mM, the absorbance intensity corresponding to 400 μM H2O2 became occasionally lower than that corresponding to 200 μM. This result is due to the fact that the produced high concentration of GNPs solution does not have enough Na3Cit and easily forms aggregate. Since the pH value and concentration of MES probably change the reduction ability of MES, we varied the pH value and concentration of MES to choose the best pH and concentration of MES. The best pH value was found to be 6.5 (Figure S3). The MES concentration also affects the performance of the above H2O2 sensor probably due to the changed ratio of MES to Na3Cit (Figure S4).In a representative condition, GNPs solutions with different tonality could be obtained depending on the concentration of H2O2 (Figure 2(a)). Light blue solutions corresponding to lower concentration of H2O2 (20–100 μM) were obtained, and purple to wine red solutions corresponding to higher concentration of H2O2 (200–600 μM) were produced. As a result, 20 μM H2O2 can be detected by the naked eye. Colorimetric assay showed that the maximum absorbance values increased and the GNPs surface plasmon resonance (SPR) peak blue-shifted from 560 nm to 540 nm as the concentration of H2O2 increased (Figure 2(b)). The blueshift of SPR peak in this system was opposite to the redshift usually observed in seed-mediated gold enlargement systems [2, 5]. After the concentration of H2O2 decreased to 100 μM, obviously broadening of the SPR peaks was observed. This abrupt change of SPR peaks was consistent with the change of red color to light blue color.Generation of GNP solutions with different colors depends on the concentration of H2O2. (a) Photograph showing the generation of nanoparticle solutions with different colors and intensities after 10 min. (b) Absorbance spectra of GNPs generated with different concentration of H2O2. From bottom to up: 0, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 600 μM.
(a)
(b)Because MES (1.0 mM) was excessive toAuCl4- (0.45 mM) while H2O2 (0–400 μM) was insufficient to reduce all the AuCl4-, the AuNPs generation probably changed after H2O2 was consumed completely. However, it was found that the AuNPs generation reached a plateau after 10 minutes and then the developed color changed very slowly. After the color developing for 60 min, 25 μM H2O2 still can be differentiated by the naked eye (Figure 3(a)) and 5 μM H2O2 by spectrophotometry (Figure 3(b)). These results demonstrate that this one-pot reaction has a wide window for analysis of H2O2, which can facilitate practical applications. When H2O2 was detected by a spectrophotometer, a linear range of 2–400 μM (R2=99.6%) was obtained and the detection limit (S/N=3) is evaluated as 0.5 μM (Figure 4). The sensitivity of the developed method here is higher or comparable with that of some other nanoparticle-based colorimetric H2O2 sensors [7, 14, 15].H2O2 (0–400 μM) reduction of GNPs over time: (A) 0 μM, (B) 5 μM, (C) 12.5 μM, (D) 25 μM, (E) 50 μM, (F) 100 μM, (G) 200 μM, and (H) 400 μM H2O2.
(a)
(b)Figure 4
Calibration curve for quantitative detection of H2O2. H2O2 reduction of GNPs kept for 10 min. The error bars represent standard derivations.To further understand the interesting property of this visual H2O2 sensor, we observed the shapes of the GNPs reduced by the different concentration of H2O2. Branched GNPs comprising branched nanocrystals with about 10 nm dimension were found by the reduction of 100 μM H2O2 (Figures 5(a)–5(e)). GNP dimers comprising 20–25 nm branches can be found by the reduction of 400 μM H2O2 (Figure 5(f)), while dispersed quasi-spherical GNPs in the dimension of 30–40 nm can be found by the reduction of 600 μM H2O2 (Figure 5(g)). This finding is probably useful in controllable synthesis of branched GNPs, which is very useful for the fabrication of nanosensors, multiple-terminal devices, and so forth [16].TEM images of GNPs generated with varied H2O2 concentrations: (a–e) 100 μM H2O2, (f) 400 μM H2O2, and (g) 600 μM H2O2.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)The entirely different shapes of GNPs generated in the presence of varied concentrations of H2O2 suggest that two processes at least will happen in this MES-Na3Cit-AuCl4--H2O2 reaction (Scheme 1). One process involves the reduction of AulCl4- by MES. Since, with the addition of Na3Cit and in the absence of H2O2, MES still produced weak reduction of AuCl4-, MES can act like an “initiator” (Figure 1(b)). MES also functions like other zwitterionic molecules under certain conditions since many Good’s buffers can serve as shape-directing agents in synthesis of branched gold nanocrystals [16]. Another process involves the reduction of AulCl4- by MES, which mainly depends on the reduction of AuCl4- by H2O2. With the addition of increased H2O2, the enlargement of gold nanoparticles gradually overwhelms the generation of the branched gold nanocrystals.Scheme 1
Cartoon of the generation of different shapes of GNPs.Detection of Glucose. Numerous oxidases can produce H2O2 upon the oxidation of the respective substrates by O2. It suggests that this AuCl4-/MES/Na3Cit system can probably be employed as an effective tool for the visual sensing of oxidases and their substrates. We have applied this system to detect glucose by using glucose oxidase (GOD) and glucose/O2 as H2O2 producing system. Figure 6(a) shows the visual detection results of glucose in this reaction system. The solution color deepened gradually as the glucose concentration was increased. Light blue solution was produced corresponding to 0.03–0.1 mM glucose while purple solution was produced corresponding to 0.3–1.0 mM glucose. After glucose concentration increased to above 3.0 mM, the produced solutions changed to bright red wine. This color change can be distinguished clearly by the naked eye. This sensitivity is comparable with the method reported recently but shows more distinguishable and controllable color development model [17]. Figure 6(b) showed that the absorbance intensity of reaction solutions increased gradually as the glucose concentration increased. The detection limit of 0.01 mM glucose (S/N=3) and linear range from 0.01 to 0.3 mM were obtained by spectrophotometry (Figure 6(b)). The sensitivity is higher than or comparable with that of the colorimetric methods recently reported [7, 14, 17, 18].Generation of nanoparticle solutions with different colors depends on the concentration of glucose. (a) Photograph showing the generation of GNP solutions with different colors and intensities. (b) Plots of absorbance values of GNP solutions against the concentration of glucose. Inset: linear relationship between absorbance values and glucose concentrations.
(a)
(b)Detection of Catalase. Catalase is very important enzyme in protecting the cell from oxidative damage by reactive oxygen species. Catalase is also a key indicator of mastitis disease in milk [19, 20]. Thus, facile detection catalase will be useful in many fields. Since catalase can decompose H2O2 efficiently, coupling this decomposition with the above AuCl4-/MES/Na3Cit reaction can probably be utilized to probe the activity of catalase. As expected, the performance adverse to that of the above H2O2 detection was found (Figure 7(a)). As the concentration of catalase increased from 0.03 U/mL to 21.0 U/mL, different solution colors from wine red and purple to light blue were demonstrated. By the naked eye, 0.3 U/mL of catalase can be clearly distinguished. In addition, the detection limit of 0.026 U/mL catalase (S/N=3) can be achieved by spectrophotometry (Figure 7(b)). The sensitivity of the “naked eye” or colorimetric methods developed here is higher than the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) method [20] and amperometric biosensor reported recently [19] or comparable with that of some expensive commercial available kits for catalase detection.Generation of nanoparticle solutions with different colors depends on the concentration of catalase. (a) Photograph showing the generation of GNP solutions with different colors and intensities. (b) Plots of absorbance values of GNP solutions against the concentration of catalase. Inset: linear relationship between absorbance values and catalase concentrations.
(a)
(b)


## 4. Conclusions

In conclusion, gold nanoparticles (GNPs) with different shapes can be generated in the reduction of HAuCl4 by varied concentration of H2O2 with the assist of dual-molecules, 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES) and sodium citrate. This simple AuCl4-/MES/Na3Cit/H2O2 reaction system can also be employed to sensitively detect H2O2 by “naked eye” and has been applied to probe substrate or enzyme in oxidase-based reactions. This interesting H2O2 sensor is ascribed to a proposed “dual-molecules assist” mechanism. Since many other Good’s buffers besides MES can reduce AuCl4- and many other molecules besides sodium citrate function as stabilizers in the synthesis of GNPs, a great deal of combination can be explored to optimize the performance of these H2O2 and oxidase-based sensors. The developed catalase sensor can probably be utilized to fabricate ultrasensitive ELISA methods for various analytes, which is now being studied by our group. Additionally, branched anisotropic GNPs can be synthetized via this “dual-molecules assist” strategy.



---

*Source: 576082-2014-10-13.xml*