# Energy Spectrum of Shallow Donor in Elongated InAs/GaAs Volcano-Shaped Quantum Dot

Authors: L. F. García; R. A. Escorcia; I. D. Mikhailov
Journal: Advances in Condensed Matter Physics
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

We study the effect of the nonparabolicity of the conduction band on the spectral properties of the shallow donor in elongated InAs/GaAs quantum dots with volcano-shaped profile in the framework of the Kane model by using a simple semiempiric relation between geometrical parameters of the quantum dot profile and the confinement potential, governing the in-plane electron’s movement. We represent the solution of the Schrödinger equation in the form of double Bessel-Fourier series expansion. We show that the nonparabolicity of dispersion of the conduction band, given by the Kane formula, conduces to significant lowering of the donor energies and to stronger confinement of the electron within the quantum dot. Calculated results for the energies as functions of the electric and magnetic fields for different quantum dot dimensions were compared with those obtained in the effective mass approximation. Our results exhibit a high sensibility of the probability density of electron distribution in volcano-shaped quantum dot to the variation of the external magnetic and electric fields.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Recent development of nanofabrication techniques such as chemical vapor deposition, liquid-phase, molecular beam, and advanced droplet epitaxy [1–6] offers an attractive route for designing of new semiconductor materials for possible applications in opto- and microelectronic devices. In addition, the electrical and optical properties of nanostructures may be modified by doping the shallow impurities, whose energy levels in these materials are very sensible to the variation of the impurity position, the nanostructure size, and dimension. A great deal of attention of investigators during previous two decades has been attracted to the study of the effect of the quantum confinement on the impurity states in various nanostructures, such as single, double, and multiple quantum wells [7–11], quantum-well wires [12, 13], and quantum dots (QDs) [14–18] by commonly using the effective mass approximation (EMA) and the variational method.The morphology of nanostructures can be sufficiently complicated, and therefore the calculation by means of the variational method requires generally a lot of computational work related especially to the estimation of multidimensional integrals. In the case of QDs, which generally have a form of nonhomogeneous very thin layer, the numerical procedure can be simplified in the framework of the adiabatic approximation (AA), in which one can study separately the slow in-plane and fast transversal movements [19, 20]. Application of the AA allows us to reduce the actual 3D problem for impurity confined in a thin semiconductor layer to two-dimensional Schrödinger equation for the hydrogen atom placed in a field with an adiabatic potential. The adiabatic potential of QDs with different morphologies can be calculated numerically [21].However, the applicability of two-dimensional models and the AA in many cases is doubtful for two reasons: possible nonparabolicity of the conduction band and strong tunneling of the electron outside the QD trough junctions. The first of them is essential when the gapΔ between the valence and conduction bands is small and the mixing of these two bands is essential such as in InAs (Δ ~ 0.4 eV) or InSb (Δ ~ 0.5 eV), while the tunneling becomes essential when the barrier height in junctions and the layer thickness are relatively small. Calculations, realized previously in framework of the EMA [22] have demonstrated that in a thin InAs/GaAs quantum disk with the thickness < 4 nm, the electron can be located outside the disk with the probability being about 30%. Earlier, it has been proposed to replace the EMA by the Kane model [23] with a consistent energy-dependent effective mass in order to analyze these effects on the spectral properties of the electron and exciton confined in a thin InAs/GaAs QD by using finite element method [24, 25] and AA [26]. It has been shown that the nonparabolicity causes an essential lowering of the carriers’ energies reinforcing in this way their confinement inside SAQD and giving in this way an additional reason for applicability of 2D models for QDs with relatively small barrier heights and energy gaps.Recently, advanced technics have enabled the fabrication quantum dot structures with a wide diversity of almost ideal morphologies but with inherent imperfections, reflected in experimentally found photoluminescence spectra [27–31]. The structures generally show a good circular symmetry, but with an inherent slight elongation along of one of the directions and a noticeable asymmetry in the thickness of the layer breaking the rotational symmetry, which complicate the theoretical analysis of the photoluminescence spectrum. Below we propose a simple numerical procedure, which allows us to analyze the energy spectrum of a shallow donor placed in an elongated InAs/GaAs volcano-shaped quantum dot, in the framework of the Kane model and by using a nonvariational method. Moreover, our procedure permits studying the effect of the electric and magnetic fields applied, respectively, perpendicularly and parallel to the crystal growth direction. In order to calculate the energies of lower levels as functions of the magnetic field, we use an interpolative relationship between the adiabatic potential of the InAs layer and the local thickness found in [26], considering a model with finite barrier height in the junctions of the InAs QD surrounded by the GaAs matrix and taking into account the nonparabolicity of the conduction bands in both materials. We obtain the energies and wave functions of reduced two-dimensional Schrödinger equation by using the double Fourier-Bessel series expansion method.The organization of this paper is as follows: In Section2, we present the theoretical model and explain our calculation method of the energies, the charge distribution, the density of energy states, and the electric and magnetic momenta for on- and off-axis donors confined in an elongated InAs/GaAs volcano-shaped quantum dot. Numerical results are presented in Section 3 and some conclusions in Section 4.


## 2. Theory

In order to study the energy spectrum of shallow donor confined in volcano-shaped InAs/GaAs QR, taking into account strong nonparabolicity of the InAs conduction band, we use below a simple version of the Kane model, proposed in [23, 24]. In this version the electron in a semiconductor bulk is considered as a free particle with the energy-dependent effective mass placed in a band with the parabolic dispersion. In addition, it is assumed that the material parameters in QDs have mismatches in junctions and they are characterized by spatial-dependent band-gap energy and effective mass. The corresponding nonlinear Schrödinger equation for the electron released from the donor with the position vector ri in a homogeneous magnetic field B=Bz^ applied along the z-axis and a homogeneous electric field F=Fx^ in the Kane model has the form [23, 24](1)H^E,rΨr=EΨr;H^E,r=-iħ∇+eAr12m∗E,r-iħ∇+eAr+Vr+eFx-e24πεε0r-ri.Here ε is the dielectric constant of the InAs, A=B×r/2 is vector potential, Vr is the confinement potential equal to zero inside the QD layer 0<z<dρ,φ and to V0; otherwise, dρ,φ defines the profile of QD, and m∗E,r is the energy- and position-dependent effective mass, defined as(2)m0m∗E,r=2P23ħ22Egr+E+1Egr+E+Δr,where m0 is free electron mass, P is Kane’s momentum matrix element, Eg is the band gap, Δ is the spin–orbit splitting of the valence band, and E are eigenvalues of the nonlinear wave equation (1). We simulate theInAs/GaAs ring by using the material parameters forInAs inside the rings being Eg1 = 0.42 eV, Δ1 = 0.38 eV, and m1∗0=0.024m0. The parameters forGaAs are Eg2 = 1.52 eV, Δ2 = 0.34 eV, and m2∗0=0.067m0; the mismatch of the band gap at the junction is equal to V0=0.7Eg2-Eg1 [27–31]. We use below, as dimensionless units, the effective Bohr radius a0∗=4πε0εħ2/m1∗0e2≈28.65 nm, the effective Rydberg Ry∗=e2/8πε0εa0∗≈1.93·10-3 eV, and γ=eħB/2m1∗0Ry∗≈1.26·BTα=ea0∗F/Ry∗≈1.48F (kV/cm) as units of magnetic and electric fields and the dimensionless magnetic field strength, respectively, with ε being the dielectric constant ofInAsmaterial.Taking into account the strong anisotropy of the nanostructure, one can use the adiabatic approximation, in which fast transverse and slow in-plane movements may be considered separately, representing the electron wave function as follows:(3)Ψr=fρ,φzψρ,φ∪H^ρ,φEz,rfρ,φz=Ezρ,φfρ,φz.The transverse wave function fρ,φz with fixed polar coordinates ρ,φ satisfies additional Ben Daniel Duke boundary condition at the bottom of the layer with the coordinate z=0 and at each point of the top of the layer z=dρ,φ. One can find the lowest energy Ezρ,φ for such movement that is used then as the adiabatic potential for the in-plane electron movement Vρ,φ by solving a transcendental equation [26] and obtaining the in-plane adiabatic confinement potential related to the layer thickness dρ,φ as follows:(4)Vρ,φ=9.5dρ,φ.To simulate a uniform volcano-like QR we use below the parameterized function, which in polar coordinates defines the variation of the thickness of the layer:(5)dρ,φ=dr1+2ρ/Rφp-1w2-1;p=1,2,3,….Here dr is the height of the rim and w is the effective width of the volcano, related to the central hole dh as follows:(6)dh=dr1+2/w2p;w=2·drdh-1-1/2p.We choose the dependence Rrφ of the oval-shaped rim radius with the eccentricity e on the polar coordinate φ as(7)Rrφ=a1+ecos2⁡φ;e≥0.In Figure 1 we display profiles of radial cross sections of the model for different central hole heights, and Figure 2 shows the 3D images corresponding to the ratio dh/dr=0.1 at the upper row, the ratio dh/dr=0.4 at the lower row, and the eccentricities e = 0, 0.5, and 1.0.Figure 1
Profiles of radial cross sections.Figure 2
3D images of elongated volcano-shaped QDs with different eccentricities;e = 0, 0.5, and 1.0.The differential equation for the in-plane part of the wave function (3) ψρ,φ in the two-dimensional field resulted from the adiabatic potential (4) and the Coulomb attraction to the donor located over the X-axis, with the position vector in dimensionless units having the following form [27]:(8a)H∥ρ,φψρ,φ=E~ψρ,φ;ψρ,φ+2π=ψρ,φ;E~=E·ηE;ηE=EEg1+1EEg1+Δ1+1EEg1+2Δ1/3+1-1,(8b)H∥ρ,φ=T^ρ,φ-iγ∂∂φ+γ2ρ24+αFρcos⁡φ+U^ρ,φ;T^ρ,φ=-∂2∂ρ2-1ρ∂∂ρ-1ρ2∂2∂φ2;U^ρ,φ=9.5dρ,φ-2ρ2+ρi2-2ρiρcos⁡φ.The boundary value problem for the wave equation (8a) and (8b) should be completed by frontier condition at the radial direction. In our calculations, we assume that the wave function is equal to zero outside the circular region of the radius RF; that is, ψRF,φ=0.To solve eigenvalue problem (8a) and (8b) by means of the double Fourier-Bessel series expansion method, one can use the following normalized base functions that automatically fulfill the frontier conditions:(9a)ψm,nρ,φ=Am,nRπeimφJmxn,mρR:Am,n=1Jm+1xm,n;ψm,nψm′,n′=δm,m′δn,n′.Here Jmx is the Bessel function of the order m and xn,m is the nth zero of this function. We seek the solution of (8a) and (8b) in the form of the following series expansion:(9b)ψρ,φ=∑n,m=-∞∞Cn,mψm,nρ,φ.According to the Galerkin projection method, functions (9a) and (9b) satisfy conditions(10)ψm,nρ,φH^ρ,φ-E~ψρ,φ=0;E~=E·ηE.Substituting (9a) and (9b) in (10), one can obtain the following system of linear secular equations:(11a)∑n,m=-∞∞Hn,m;n′,m′-E~δm,m′δn,n′Cn′,m′=0,(11b)Hn,m;n′,m′=Am,nAm,n′πR2∫02πdφ∫0Re-imφJmxm,nρRH^∥ρ,φe-im′φJm′xm′,n′ρRρdρ.We analytically found matrix elements (11b) for all terms of the Hamiltonian (8b), except the last one, which was calculated numerically. By solving the secular equation (11a), we found eigenvalues E~k and eigenvectors Cnmk,k=1,2,3,…. Eigenvalues E~k define the donor energies in the effective mass approximation. In order to take into consideration the effect of the nonparabolicity of the conduction band and to find the corresponding energies Ek in the framework of the Kane model, one should solve, in addition, nonlinear algebraic equations Ek·ηEk=E~k.Once the secular equation is solved, eigenvaluesE~k and eigenvectors Cnmk,k=1,2,3,…, are found, and then the probability density of charge distribution of the corresponding states can be found as follows:(12)fkρ,φ=πR2-1∑n,m,n′,m′Cnmk∗Cn′m′kAm,nAm′,n′JmtJm′tcosm-m′φ;t=xn,mρR.


## 3. Results and Discussions

All results that we present below are referred to as the structure with geometrical parameters:a = 20 nm, dr = 4 nm, dh = 2 nm, and p=1. First, we analyze the effect of the nonparabolicity of the conduction band.In Figure3 we compare the curves of the energies dependencies on the external magnetic field calculated for on-center donor in the circular QR e=0 in the effective mass approximation and in the framework of the Kane model. Similitude of the results obtained in both models is seen with only one essential difference: the energies in the Kane model are essentially lower than those in the effective mass approximation; that is, the nonparabolicity of the conduction band softens the effect of the structural confinement and in this way offers an additional argument for the applicability of the adiabatic approximation [26].Figure 3
Energies of the on-center donor in circular QR as functions of the external magnetic field calculated in (a) in the effective mass approximation and (b) in the framework of the Kane model.
(a) (b)In Figures3(a) and 3(b) one can see that the dependence of the ground state energy on the magnetic field is feebly manifested only in a weak oscillation of the ground state energy near a straight line. In contrast, the spatial charge distribution and the magnetic momentum can suffer sharp variations because the energy gaps between the ground and first excited states periodically vanish. At points A, B, C, where gaps in Figure 3(b) are vanished, the values of the magnetic fields approximately are γ = 5, 10, and 15, respectively. Therefore, we calculate for these values the probability density of charge distribution in the ground k=1 and first excited k=2 states by using the relation (12). Corresponding contour plots are displayed in Figure 4, for the ground state in Figures 4(a), 4(c), 4(e), and 4(g) and for the first excited state at Figures 4(b), 4(d), 4(f), and 4(h). The charge distributions in all cases are similar to those of two-dimensional orbits hydrogen-like. For example, for zero-magnetic field case the charge distribution in the ground state is s-like and for excited state in Figure 4(b) it is p-like. As the magnetic field is increased up to γ=5 at the point A in Figure 3, the charge distributions in the ground and excited states in Figures 4(c) and 4(d) are inverted. Similar transformations suffer charge distributions as the increasing magnetic field reaches the point B and the value γ=10; the p-like charge distribution of the ground state is transformed in the d-like one, while the charge s-like distribution of the excited state is transformed in in p-like one in Figures 4(e) and 4(f), respectively.Figure 4
Charge distribution for on-center donor in the ground state (a, c, e, g) and in the first excited state (b, d, f, h) forγ=0,5,10,15 in circular QR.


### 3.1. Off-Center Donor in Circular QR

The displacement of the donor from the center of the circular QR breaks the system axial symmetry of the structure and provides the localization of the lowest rotational state, manifested in removing of the periodic degeneration of two lowest levels and in a substantial increase of the nonvanishing gap between them as the distance from the position of the donor to the center is increased. In Figure5 we show lower energies as functions of the magnetic field for off-center donors placed at the distances ρi = 10 nm and ρi = 20 nm from the center of the circular QR.Figure 5
Energies of the off-center donor in circular QR as functions of the external magnetic field calculated for two different donor’s positions.
(a) (b)It is seen that the energy dependencies of the upper excited states on the magnetic field are changed with the displacement of the donor position insignificantly. Commonly, the break of the symmetry of the structures disturbs the charge distribution to a much greater extent than energy spectrum. In Figure6 we display contour plots that show the evolution of the charge distribution in QR with off-center donor in the ground state under growing magnetic field.Figure 6
Charge distribution for off-center donor (ρi = 20 nm) in the ground state (a, b) and in the first excited state (c, d) for γ=0,5,10,15 in circular QR.
(a) (b) (c) (d)It is seen that the increase of the magnetic field does not change the symmetry of the charge distribution in the ground state, providing only the spatial confinement around the donor location without mixing of the ground state with excited states.


### 3.2. On-Center Donor in Elongated QR

Donor energies calculated as functions of the magnetic field in elongated QRs and presented in Figure7 exhibit dependencies essentially different from the structure with circular rim shown in Figure 3. In elongated QR, the central symmetry C∞ of the confinement potential is transformed to the axial symmetry D2, for which only the projection of the angular momentum on the horizontal axis is conserved. It allows us to classify the donor states in elongated QRs according to the value Λ=0,1,2 of this projection, commonly denoted by letters Σ, Π, Δ, respectively. Moreover, this structure is invariant with respect to the inversion operation; that is, the Hamiltonian remains unchanged if signs of all electron coordinates are turned over. Since this transformation commutes also with the operator of the angular momentum, there are two different wave functions corresponding to the same angular momentum Λ but to two different wave functions, one with even (g) parity, which is unchanged with respect to the inversion, and the other with odd (u) parity, which changes sign.Figure 7
Energies of the on-center donor in elongated QR with parametersa = 20 nm, dr = 4 nm, dh = 2 nm, and e=0.5,1.0, and 1.5, as functions of the external magnetic field. Inset in Figure 8(b) shows details of the first crossover of the lowest levels.Figure 8
Charge distribution for on-center donor in the groundk=1 and in the first excited k=2 states for the magnetic field strengths γ=5 and γ=11 in elongated QR with the eccentricity parameter e=1.Unlike the corresponding dependencies for circular QR in Figure3, one can observe in Figure 7 for γ=0 nonzero gaps between the states with different parity Σg, Σu and Πg, Πu, in the energy spectrum of on-center donor. The splitting of sublevels with different parities in this case is induced by the anisotropy of the confinement potential in elongated QR. This degeneracy is due to the twofold rotational symmetry of the structure, but unlike the similar effect in circular QR, the degeneracy is no longer restored periodically. However, these two sublevels become again degenerated when the magnetic field is increased. The greater the eccentricity parameter e is, that is, the smaller the lateral dimension of the QR is, the larger then the distances between adjacent points of the degeneration in the lower curves in Figure 8 become. (Note that in circular QR of radius R these distances are ~1/R2.)One can reveal another interesting peculiarity of the curves in Figure7 compared with similar dependencies in Figure 5 for off-axis donor in the circular QR, a system with similar symmetry. The presence of the off-axis donor in circular QR also breaks the central symmetry C∞ of the structure, resulting in the localization of the electron in the ground state and the formation of a nonvanishing energy gap between two lowest levels. One can observe a similar alteration of the energy spectrum at the lower part of the energies dependencies in Figure 7 where, unlike Figure 5, not one but two curves for states Σg and Σu are split off from other upper energy levels. The splitting of these two levels is due to the additional symmetry that is inherent in the geometry of the elongated QR with on-center donor.The existence of the intersections of the energies dependencies of the ground and the excited states on the magnetic field conduces to a drastic alteration of the charge distribution in the system, when the magnetic field exceeds a critical value. As an example, let us consider two curves presented in Figure7(b) for states Σg and Σu, which have the first intersection at the point A as the magnetic field increases reaching the value γ=10. At this point configurations of the ground and first excited states are changed sharply. In order to compare these configurations before and after this transition we present in Figure 8 the contour plots of the charge distributions in two lower states for the external magnetic fields γ=5 and γ=11.Contour plots in Figures8(a) and 8(b) for γ=5 show that the charge distribution in the ground state k=1 has the clearly pronounced even parity Σg, while the first excited state k=2 has the odd parity Σu. Parities of the ground and excited states are inverted as the magnetic field increases becoming equal to γ=11 and, therefore, contour plots for two lower states for γ=11 in Figure 8 are mutually interchanged. At the same time, after inversion, both these distributions are no longer pure; they exhibit weak mixing of two functions with different parities. A sharp transformation of charge distribution in two lowest energy states at the point γ=10 of Figure 8(b) is similar to one, typical for the second order phase transition.


### 3.3. Off-Center Donor in Elongated QR

If the off-center donor is placed over the horizontal axis of an elongated QR, the axial symmetry of the system continues to be conserved and therefore the projection of the angular momentum is still a “good” quantum number for the classification of the energy levels, unlike the parity of the wave function, which no longer can be used for this purpose. In Figures9 and 10 we present results of calculations of the energies and the charge distributions for the donor placed at the point with polar coordinates ρi = 20 nm, ϑi=0° corresponding to the location at the rim of the crater. Comparing the energy dependencies on the magnetic field for on-axis donor in Figure 7(b) with those for off-axis donor presented in Figure 9, one can notice general similitude between two sets of curves.Figure 9
Energies of the off-axis donor in elongated QR with parametersa = 20 nm, dr = 4 nm, dh = 2 nm, and e=1.0 as functions of the external magnetic field.Figure 10
Charge distribution in elongated QR with the eccentricity parametere=1 induced by off-axis donor (ρi = 20 nm) in the ground and in the first excited states for the magnetic fields γ=0, γ=11, and γ=22.
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)There are only small differences in the values of the energies and the positions of the crossovers of the curves. Particularly, the energies in Figure9 are higher than those in Figure 7(b) by about 2Ry∗, the value that is consistent with the decreasing of the energy of the electron-donor attraction due to the increase of the averaged electron-donor separation related to the corresponding displacement of the donor position. Also, the first crossover of the energy dependencies of two lowest levels with Λ=0 and Λ=1 takes place in Figure 9 for the magnetic field that is slightly lower than one for the circular QR. Nevertheless, the variations of the charge distribution with the increase of the magnetic field in circular and elongated QRs are essentially different, unlike similar alterations of the energies. One can observe it comparing contour plots in Figure 8 for the circular QR with those presented in Figure 10 for elongated QR.Contour plots in Figures10(a) and 10(b) for two lowest states for γ=0 are similar to those in Figures 8(a) and 8(b), demonstrating a weak influence of the electron-donor donor electrostatic interaction. In fact, in the considered configuration the donor is located at the point with polar coordinates ρi = 20 nm, φi=0, while the electron in these states is mainly sited close to the points ρ = 10 nm, φ = ±90° and the averaged separation between them is sufficiently large. As the magnetic field is increased, the induced diamagnetic confinement diminishes this separation and provides a modification of the charge distribution mixing partially the wave functions of two lowest states. However, the magnetic field does not show any drastic alteration in the charge distribution because of absence of the high symmetry in this configuration, unlike the case of on-axis donor.


### 3.4. Effect of the Electric Field on Off-Axis Donor in Circular QD

The excessive electron, released from the donor, located in volcano-shaped QD, is mainly located within a narrow region along its rim, constrained by the structural confinement. Energy gaps between states with different angular momenta in such arrangement are relatively small and therefore they become mixed in the presence of the external magnetic and electric fields. The electron in the ground state is located mainly at the region of the rim at shortest distance from the donor and the binding energy of this state is about2Ry∗~4 meV. One can estimate that the electric field required for gaining this energy and for transferring the electron toward the opposite side of the rim is about 10 kV/cm, and the charge distribution in the QD is induced by a donor located at the rim.Such field could be able to modify drastically the charge distribution inside the QD, originating a giant dipole momentum. In Figures11(a) and 11(b) we display the energies of some lower levels as functions of the electric field for the zero -magnetic field case γ=0 and in the presence of a strong magnetic field γ=20 (B≃16T). The slopes of these curves define the dipole momentum of the corresponding configuration. Critical electric fields, for which the slopes of curves in Figure 11 are changed abruptly, provide a drastic change of the charge distribution inside the QR and the polarizability of the structure. The adiabatic potential of the excessive electron resulting from the structural confinement, electron-donor interaction, and the external electric field has, along with the crater’s rim, two minima: one at the region close to the donor and the other on the opposite side of the crater, originated by the electric field. When the increasing electric field attains the critical value, the second minimum becomes deeper than the first one. It is seen that the critical value of the electric field in the case of γ=0 is smaller than for γ=20 and the change of the slope in the first case is essentially smoother than in the presence of the strong magnetic field.Figure 11
Lower energies of donor located at the crater’s rim of the circular QR as functions of the electric field in the cases (a) zero-magnetic field and (b)γ=20 and contour plots for corresponding charge distributions.
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)In Figures12(a)–12(d) we present the contour plots of the charge distributions in a QR induced by the off-axis donor for three different values of the external electric field, in the presence of the magnetic field γ=0 (Figures 12(c)–12(e)) and γ=20 (Figures 12(f)–12(h)). One can observe that, as in the zero-magnetic-field case (γ=0), the maximum of the density of the charge distribution shifts substantially to the left as the electric field increases. On the contrary, for γ=20 the maximum jumps abruptly as the electric field becomes superior to 3.5 kV/cm. This result shows that the magnetic field obstructs the electric polarizability and it can be used to control the electric properties of the structure.Figure 12
Lower energies of donor located at the crater’s rim of the elongated QR as functions of the electric field in the cases (a) zero-magnetic field and (b)γ=20 and (c–f) contour plots for charge distributions.
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)


### 3.5. Effect of the Electric Field on Off-Axis Donor in Elongated QD

One can expect similar effects for elongated QRs, but less pronounced. Really, elongated QRs have no longer central symmetry and therefore the mobility of the electron along the crater’s rim under applied external electric field is more constrained. In this case it is necessary to apply a stronger electric field in order to achieve an essential redistribution of the probability density. In Figure12 we show the results of calculation for elongated QR with the geometrical parameters a = 20 nm and e=0.25 similar to those presented in Figure 11 for a circular QR.One can observe a general similarity of Figures11 and 12 with one essential difference in the scale of the electric field. It is clear that the electric field required for an alteration of the electron orbits configurations in elongated QD is larger due to lack of the symmetry in comparison with the one in circular structure.


## 3.1. Off-Center Donor in Circular QR

The displacement of the donor from the center of the circular QR breaks the system axial symmetry of the structure and provides the localization of the lowest rotational state, manifested in removing of the periodic degeneration of two lowest levels and in a substantial increase of the nonvanishing gap between them as the distance from the position of the donor to the center is increased. In Figure5 we show lower energies as functions of the magnetic field for off-center donors placed at the distances ρi = 10 nm and ρi = 20 nm from the center of the circular QR.Figure 5
Energies of the off-center donor in circular QR as functions of the external magnetic field calculated for two different donor’s positions.
(a) (b)It is seen that the energy dependencies of the upper excited states on the magnetic field are changed with the displacement of the donor position insignificantly. Commonly, the break of the symmetry of the structures disturbs the charge distribution to a much greater extent than energy spectrum. In Figure6 we display contour plots that show the evolution of the charge distribution in QR with off-center donor in the ground state under growing magnetic field.Figure 6
Charge distribution for off-center donor (ρi = 20 nm) in the ground state (a, b) and in the first excited state (c, d) for γ=0,5,10,15 in circular QR.
(a) (b) (c) (d)It is seen that the increase of the magnetic field does not change the symmetry of the charge distribution in the ground state, providing only the spatial confinement around the donor location without mixing of the ground state with excited states.


## 3.2. On-Center Donor in Elongated QR

Donor energies calculated as functions of the magnetic field in elongated QRs and presented in Figure7 exhibit dependencies essentially different from the structure with circular rim shown in Figure 3. In elongated QR, the central symmetry C∞ of the confinement potential is transformed to the axial symmetry D2, for which only the projection of the angular momentum on the horizontal axis is conserved. It allows us to classify the donor states in elongated QRs according to the value Λ=0,1,2 of this projection, commonly denoted by letters Σ, Π, Δ, respectively. Moreover, this structure is invariant with respect to the inversion operation; that is, the Hamiltonian remains unchanged if signs of all electron coordinates are turned over. Since this transformation commutes also with the operator of the angular momentum, there are two different wave functions corresponding to the same angular momentum Λ but to two different wave functions, one with even (g) parity, which is unchanged with respect to the inversion, and the other with odd (u) parity, which changes sign.Figure 7
Energies of the on-center donor in elongated QR with parametersa = 20 nm, dr = 4 nm, dh = 2 nm, and e=0.5,1.0, and 1.5, as functions of the external magnetic field. Inset in Figure 8(b) shows details of the first crossover of the lowest levels.Figure 8
Charge distribution for on-center donor in the groundk=1 and in the first excited k=2 states for the magnetic field strengths γ=5 and γ=11 in elongated QR with the eccentricity parameter e=1.Unlike the corresponding dependencies for circular QR in Figure3, one can observe in Figure 7 for γ=0 nonzero gaps between the states with different parity Σg, Σu and Πg, Πu, in the energy spectrum of on-center donor. The splitting of sublevels with different parities in this case is induced by the anisotropy of the confinement potential in elongated QR. This degeneracy is due to the twofold rotational symmetry of the structure, but unlike the similar effect in circular QR, the degeneracy is no longer restored periodically. However, these two sublevels become again degenerated when the magnetic field is increased. The greater the eccentricity parameter e is, that is, the smaller the lateral dimension of the QR is, the larger then the distances between adjacent points of the degeneration in the lower curves in Figure 8 become. (Note that in circular QR of radius R these distances are ~1/R2.)One can reveal another interesting peculiarity of the curves in Figure7 compared with similar dependencies in Figure 5 for off-axis donor in the circular QR, a system with similar symmetry. The presence of the off-axis donor in circular QR also breaks the central symmetry C∞ of the structure, resulting in the localization of the electron in the ground state and the formation of a nonvanishing energy gap between two lowest levels. One can observe a similar alteration of the energy spectrum at the lower part of the energies dependencies in Figure 7 where, unlike Figure 5, not one but two curves for states Σg and Σu are split off from other upper energy levels. The splitting of these two levels is due to the additional symmetry that is inherent in the geometry of the elongated QR with on-center donor.The existence of the intersections of the energies dependencies of the ground and the excited states on the magnetic field conduces to a drastic alteration of the charge distribution in the system, when the magnetic field exceeds a critical value. As an example, let us consider two curves presented in Figure7(b) for states Σg and Σu, which have the first intersection at the point A as the magnetic field increases reaching the value γ=10. At this point configurations of the ground and first excited states are changed sharply. In order to compare these configurations before and after this transition we present in Figure 8 the contour plots of the charge distributions in two lower states for the external magnetic fields γ=5 and γ=11.Contour plots in Figures8(a) and 8(b) for γ=5 show that the charge distribution in the ground state k=1 has the clearly pronounced even parity Σg, while the first excited state k=2 has the odd parity Σu. Parities of the ground and excited states are inverted as the magnetic field increases becoming equal to γ=11 and, therefore, contour plots for two lower states for γ=11 in Figure 8 are mutually interchanged. At the same time, after inversion, both these distributions are no longer pure; they exhibit weak mixing of two functions with different parities. A sharp transformation of charge distribution in two lowest energy states at the point γ=10 of Figure 8(b) is similar to one, typical for the second order phase transition.


## 3.3. Off-Center Donor in Elongated QR

If the off-center donor is placed over the horizontal axis of an elongated QR, the axial symmetry of the system continues to be conserved and therefore the projection of the angular momentum is still a “good” quantum number for the classification of the energy levels, unlike the parity of the wave function, which no longer can be used for this purpose. In Figures9 and 10 we present results of calculations of the energies and the charge distributions for the donor placed at the point with polar coordinates ρi = 20 nm, ϑi=0° corresponding to the location at the rim of the crater. Comparing the energy dependencies on the magnetic field for on-axis donor in Figure 7(b) with those for off-axis donor presented in Figure 9, one can notice general similitude between two sets of curves.Figure 9
Energies of the off-axis donor in elongated QR with parametersa = 20 nm, dr = 4 nm, dh = 2 nm, and e=1.0 as functions of the external magnetic field.Figure 10
Charge distribution in elongated QR with the eccentricity parametere=1 induced by off-axis donor (ρi = 20 nm) in the ground and in the first excited states for the magnetic fields γ=0, γ=11, and γ=22.
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)There are only small differences in the values of the energies and the positions of the crossovers of the curves. Particularly, the energies in Figure9 are higher than those in Figure 7(b) by about 2Ry∗, the value that is consistent with the decreasing of the energy of the electron-donor attraction due to the increase of the averaged electron-donor separation related to the corresponding displacement of the donor position. Also, the first crossover of the energy dependencies of two lowest levels with Λ=0 and Λ=1 takes place in Figure 9 for the magnetic field that is slightly lower than one for the circular QR. Nevertheless, the variations of the charge distribution with the increase of the magnetic field in circular and elongated QRs are essentially different, unlike similar alterations of the energies. One can observe it comparing contour plots in Figure 8 for the circular QR with those presented in Figure 10 for elongated QR.Contour plots in Figures10(a) and 10(b) for two lowest states for γ=0 are similar to those in Figures 8(a) and 8(b), demonstrating a weak influence of the electron-donor donor electrostatic interaction. In fact, in the considered configuration the donor is located at the point with polar coordinates ρi = 20 nm, φi=0, while the electron in these states is mainly sited close to the points ρ = 10 nm, φ = ±90° and the averaged separation between them is sufficiently large. As the magnetic field is increased, the induced diamagnetic confinement diminishes this separation and provides a modification of the charge distribution mixing partially the wave functions of two lowest states. However, the magnetic field does not show any drastic alteration in the charge distribution because of absence of the high symmetry in this configuration, unlike the case of on-axis donor.


## 3.4. Effect of the Electric Field on Off-Axis Donor in Circular QD

The excessive electron, released from the donor, located in volcano-shaped QD, is mainly located within a narrow region along its rim, constrained by the structural confinement. Energy gaps between states with different angular momenta in such arrangement are relatively small and therefore they become mixed in the presence of the external magnetic and electric fields. The electron in the ground state is located mainly at the region of the rim at shortest distance from the donor and the binding energy of this state is about2Ry∗~4 meV. One can estimate that the electric field required for gaining this energy and for transferring the electron toward the opposite side of the rim is about 10 kV/cm, and the charge distribution in the QD is induced by a donor located at the rim.Such field could be able to modify drastically the charge distribution inside the QD, originating a giant dipole momentum. In Figures11(a) and 11(b) we display the energies of some lower levels as functions of the electric field for the zero -magnetic field case γ=0 and in the presence of a strong magnetic field γ=20 (B≃16T). The slopes of these curves define the dipole momentum of the corresponding configuration. Critical electric fields, for which the slopes of curves in Figure 11 are changed abruptly, provide a drastic change of the charge distribution inside the QR and the polarizability of the structure. The adiabatic potential of the excessive electron resulting from the structural confinement, electron-donor interaction, and the external electric field has, along with the crater’s rim, two minima: one at the region close to the donor and the other on the opposite side of the crater, originated by the electric field. When the increasing electric field attains the critical value, the second minimum becomes deeper than the first one. It is seen that the critical value of the electric field in the case of γ=0 is smaller than for γ=20 and the change of the slope in the first case is essentially smoother than in the presence of the strong magnetic field.Figure 11
Lower energies of donor located at the crater’s rim of the circular QR as functions of the electric field in the cases (a) zero-magnetic field and (b)γ=20 and contour plots for corresponding charge distributions.
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)In Figures12(a)–12(d) we present the contour plots of the charge distributions in a QR induced by the off-axis donor for three different values of the external electric field, in the presence of the magnetic field γ=0 (Figures 12(c)–12(e)) and γ=20 (Figures 12(f)–12(h)). One can observe that, as in the zero-magnetic-field case (γ=0), the maximum of the density of the charge distribution shifts substantially to the left as the electric field increases. On the contrary, for γ=20 the maximum jumps abruptly as the electric field becomes superior to 3.5 kV/cm. This result shows that the magnetic field obstructs the electric polarizability and it can be used to control the electric properties of the structure.Figure 12
Lower energies of donor located at the crater’s rim of the elongated QR as functions of the electric field in the cases (a) zero-magnetic field and (b)γ=20 and (c–f) contour plots for charge distributions.
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)


## 3.5. Effect of the Electric Field on Off-Axis Donor in Elongated QD

One can expect similar effects for elongated QRs, but less pronounced. Really, elongated QRs have no longer central symmetry and therefore the mobility of the electron along the crater’s rim under applied external electric field is more constrained. In this case it is necessary to apply a stronger electric field in order to achieve an essential redistribution of the probability density. In Figure12 we show the results of calculation for elongated QR with the geometrical parameters a = 20 nm and e=0.25 similar to those presented in Figure 11 for a circular QR.One can observe a general similarity of Figures11 and 12 with one essential difference in the scale of the electric field. It is clear that the electric field required for an alteration of the electron orbits configurations in elongated QD is larger due to lack of the symmetry in comparison with the one in circular structure.


## 4. Conclusions

In summary, we have proposed a simple theoretical method for analyzing the energy spectrum and the charge distribution induced by a shallow donor in an InAs/GaAs volcano-shaped quantum ring in the presence of the mutually orthogonal electric and magnetic fields taking parabolicity of the conduction band in the framework of the Kane model. The method allows us to find explicitly two-dimensional adiabatic confinement potential associated with a particular profile of the InAs layer. In this work, for simulating the profile of the elongated volcano-shaped quantum dots, we select a function with four parameters, which define the rim, the central hole, rim radii and height dimensions, and the eccentricity. For the solution of the resulting two-dimensional Schrödinger equation for the electron released from the donor, we use the double Fourier-Bessel series expansion. Comparing donor energies obtained in the effective mass approximation and for the Kane model, we find that the donor energies in the last case are noticeably lower in comparison with those obtained earlier in the effective mass approximation.We present analysis of the influence of the external magnetic field on the energy spectra of both on- and off-axis in circular and elongated volcano-shaped quantum dots. The results of energies dependencies on the magnetic field for on-axis donor in a circular structure exhibit general similitude with those obtained previously in the effective mass approximation for quasi-one-dimensional models with periodical Aharonov-Bohm oscillations and multiple crossovers. A displacement of the donor from the axis, as well transformations of the morphology of the ring, produces quenching of the oscillations of the lower levels and the disappearance of the gaps between them. In addition, we show that any change in the system related to the lack of the symmetry originates from more significant alteration of the charge distribution inside the quantum dot than those in the energy spectrum.Also, we analyze the effect of the electric field on the energy spectrum and the charge distribution induced by the off-axis donor. We found that when the increasing electric field exceeds a critical value, the charge distribution inside the structure induced by the excessive electron changes sharply generating giant dipole momentum. We show, in addition, that this process can be controlled by the external magnetic field applied along the crystal growth direction.



---

*Source: 5687272-2018-04-04.xml*