# Multiobjective Brain Storm Optimization Community Detection Method Based on Novelty Search

Authors: Xiaoying Pan; Jia Wang; Miao Wei; Hongye Li
Journal: Mathematical Problems in Engineering
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

A complex network is characterized by community structure, so it is of great theoretical and practical significance to discover hidden functions by detecting the community structure in complex networks. In this paper, a multiobjective brain storm optimization based on novelty search (MOBSO-NS) community detection method is proposed to solve the current issue of premature convergence caused by the loss of diversity in complex network community detection based on multiobjective optimization algorithm and improve the accuracy of community discovery. The proposed method designs a novel search strategy where novelty individuals are first constructed to improve the global search ability, thus avoiding falling into local optimal solutions; then, the objective space is divided into 3 clusters: elite cluster, ordinary cluster, and novel cluster, which are mapped to the decision space, and finally, the populations are disrupted and merged. In addition, the introduction of a restarting strategy is introduced to avoid stagnation by premature convergence. Experimental results show that the algorithm with good global searchability can find the Pareto optimal network community structure set with uniform distribution and high convergence and excavate the network community with higher quality.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Complex networks can be seen everywhere in real life, such as social networks [1], communication information networks [2], biological networks [3], and computer networks [4], which usually have the characteristics of small world [5], scale-free [6], and community structure [7]. The nodes within the community are closely connected, while the nodes between the communities are sparsely connected. The study of complex networks is to abstract networks into mathematical models formed composed of points and edges between points. Detecting community structure in complex network plays an important role in understanding and analyzing the topology structure of the entire network and discovering hidden functions in the network. Related research results have been successfully applied to many fields such as terrorist organization identification [8], protein function prediction, and public opinion analysis and treatment [9].In recent years, more and more attention has been paid to the problem of complex network community detection. Many scholars have carried out a lot of research work on community detection, regarding community discovery as a single-objective optimization problem and adopting different heuristic algorithms or approximate algorithms to optimize community-related objective functions, thereby obtaining the community structure of the network. To identify the division of sparse connections and dense connections among communities, Tasgin et al. [10] optimized the community modularity criterion Q with genetic algorithm (GA) that has good performances in large networks, such as fast speed and no requirement on the number of communities.Pizzutiz [11]defined community scores, which are used to judge the quality of network division, and utilized Genetic Algorithm in Networks (GA-Net) to optimize a simple and effective fitness function. The function can identify the connections between groups of nodes and its sparsity and improve the variational operator, making it consider the actual correlation between nodes, thus significantly reducing the space for studying possible solutions. Lipczak and Milios [12] proposed agglomerative clustering genetic algorithm (ACGA) based on the hypothesis that communities are small enough and the number of communities is limited. Agglomerative clustering genetic algorithm based on the ordered table of neighbors of nodes was used as a particle coding method to explore the community through global search for the cluster.Although the above single-objective optimization algorithm has the advantage of time efficiency and can mine the network satisfying a certain objective, the network community detection in practical application often needs to take into account multiple objectives, and there may be conflicts among these objectives. In view of the above limitations of the community detection algorithm based on single-objective optimization, the community detection based on multiobjective optimization begins to be concerned.In solving complex network community detection problems, a large number of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms have emerged. Chen et al.[13] proposed a multiobjective discrete MODTLBO/D method based on teaching-learning-based Optimization (TLBO). The algorithm adopted the multiobjective decomposition mechanism and introduced neighbor-based mutation to solve the community detection problem of complex network, thus maintaining the diversity of population and avoiding local optimization.Gong et al. [14] proposed multiobjective evolutionary algorithm with decomposition (MOEA/D-Net), making the multiobjective optimization problem transformed into a series of single-objective optimization subproblems and then, with the help of the information of a certain number of adjacent problems, employed evolutionary algorithm to optimize these subproblems at the same time. Li et al. [15] proposed a quantum-behavior discrete multiobjective particle swarm optimization algorithm for complex network clustering, which performed well in large networks. Gong et al. [16] proposed multiobjective discrete particle swarm optimization (MODPSO), which decomposed multiobjective network clustering problems into multiple scalar problems with the decomposition mechanism, and generated different individuals with high clustering efficiency in virtue of neighbor-based turbulence operator to promote diversity. Jiang et al. [17] proposed a community detection method based on a new link prediction strategy. The operation steps of the method were as follows. Firstly, the designed link prediction strategy based on the central node was used to add and remove edges in order to enhance the community structure of the network. Secondly, the community extension strategy was adopted to detect all communities in the network. However, the proposed link prediction strategy needed to calculate the similarity of a large number of node pairs, so the algorithm was very time-consuming. Aiming at the network Gong et al. [18] with fuzzy community structure, a nondominated neighbor immune algorithm-Net (NNIA-NET) was proposed to optimize the density of both internal link and external link and discovered the community in the network by NNIA. Zhang et al. [19] considered critical node detection based on the cascade model as a biobjective optimization problem (BCVND) proposed an effective multiobjective evolutionary approach termed as MO-BCVND to solve BCVND. In MO-BCVND, a cost-reduced population initialization strategy was raised to increase the population diversity and an adaptive local search strategy was designed to accelerate the population convergence.Zhou et al. [20] came up with multiobjective local search (MOLS-Net) algorithm, a multiobjective optimization algorithm based on local search, and designed different local search algorithms for different objectives. A hybrid genetic algorithm with link strength-based local search strategy (HGALS) is proposed by Malhotra [21] for solving the community detection problem. The local search method presented in the algorithm is faster than the traditional modularity-based search operations.The above multiobjective community detection optimization algorithms are all intelligent optimization algorithms which need to solve the balance between global search and local search to achieve the optimal structure division in the community detection problem. Therefore, the difficulty of multiobjective optimization lies in how to maintain population diversity and avoid falling into local optimization. The brainstorm algorithm searches for the local optimal with the clustering idea, obtains the global optimal through comparing the local optimal results, and increases the diversity of the algorithm by adding the mutation operation.To solve the problem of high complexity and slow speed of Gaussian, we put forward multiobjective brainstorming community detection methods based on novelty search, in which, by constructing novelty individuals, the objective space is divided into elite clusters, ordinary clusters, and novelty clusters and then mapped to the decision space. Novelty clustering took the individual with the smallestNMI value as the novelty solution to generate offspring through the cross fusion of the elite solution and the novelty solution. The novelty search mechanism has high search efficiency and excellent global optimization capabilities and adopts the restart strategy to help individuals escape from the local optimum and avoid premature convergence. "Premature" and stagnation form a single optimal solution, which improves the global search ability of the population. An external archive was established to save the Pareto optimal solution. Nondominated sorting was carried out on the population in each iteration, and the nondominated solution stored in the external archive was updated to finally get a set of Pareto optimal solutions. The brainstorming optimization algorithm has not been used to solve the problem of community detection. Therefore, the application of novelty search-based multiobjective brainstorming optimization algorithm to complex network community detection problems can better balance diversity and convergence and search for better community structure division, which is also the research motivation of this paper.


### 1.1. Section Arrangement

The rest of this paper was arranged as follows. In Section2, the community detection problem, related work for multiobjective community detection, and brainstorming algorithms are introduced. Section 3 designs a multitarget brainstorming community detection method based on novelty search and gives a detailed algorithm flow and introduction. Section 4 shows experiments conducted on MOBSO-NS on four real network datasets by comparing them with the classic methods and presents detailed information and empirical results of the proposed algorithms. Section 5 summarizes the conclusions and discussed future work.


## 1.1. Section Arrangement

The rest of this paper was arranged as follows. In Section2, the community detection problem, related work for multiobjective community detection, and brainstorming algorithms are introduced. Section 3 designs a multitarget brainstorming community detection method based on novelty search and gives a detailed algorithm flow and introduction. Section 4 shows experiments conducted on MOBSO-NS on four real network datasets by comparing them with the classic methods and presents detailed information and empirical results of the proposed algorithms. Section 5 summarizes the conclusions and discussed future work.


## 2. Related Works

### 2.1. Multiobjective Optimization Problem

The problem of multiobjective optimization is to find a compromise solution among the conflicting objectives through the mutual restriction of decision variables. The solution can simultaneously make multiple subobjective functions as optimal as possible. It can be modeled as the following equation:(1)minFX=f1x,f2x,…,fkxTs.tgix≤0,i=1,2,…,phi=0,i=1,2,…q,where x=x1,x2,...,xm∈Ω represents the m dimension decision vector, where m means the dimension of the decision vector and Ω is the feasible region of the decision space. Multiobjective optimization problem is to optimize the function vector minFX=minf1x,f2x,…,fkxT, where k is the number of objective functions. The objective function F (X) is composed of k functions mapped from the feasible region of the decision space to the objective space, where gi≤0, i=1,2,…,p, is p inequality constraints, and hi=0, i=1,2,…,q, is q equality constraints.The following are some important definitions of a domination-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm.Definition 1.
(Pareto dominance). In the decision vectorXA, XB∈ Ω, if and only if i=1,2,…,k, it is arbitrary, XA is dominant XB, and f (x) dominant relation is consistent with x dominant relation;Definition 2.
(Pareto optimal solution). Assuming that there is a decision variablex∗ in the feasible decision space Ω, if there is no decision variable x ∈ Ω like x > x∗, the decision variable x∗ is called the Pareto optimal solution.Definition 3.
(Pareto optimal solution set). The set consisting of all noninferior optimal solutions is called the optimal solution set of the multiobjective optimization problem, also known as Pareto optimal solution set.


### 2.2. Multiobjective Community Detection

A concrete network can be modeled as an undirected graphG = (V, E), where V is a set of nodes and E is a set of edges connecting two elements in V. If the network is composed of N nodes, the graph can be represented by an N × N adjacency matrix A, and the undirected graph shown in Figure 1 is represented by a symmetric adjacency matrix. Its adjacency matrix A is A symmetric matrix. When Aij = 1, it means that there is an edge connection between node I and node J, and when Aij = 0, it means that there is an infinite connection between the two nodes.Figure 1
Adjacency matrix represents an undirected graph.Radicchi et al. [22] gave the definition of community in an undirected network. Supposing there is a subgraph S ⊂ G and node i is a node in the subgraph S, the degree of node i is defined as KiS=KiinS+KioutS. KiinS=∑j∈sAij represents the internal degree of node i, that is, the number of edges between node i and other nodes in subgraph S. KioutS=∑j∉sAij represents the external degree of node i, namely, the number of node edges outside node i and subgraph S. Communities are obtained by categorizing the structural information of nodes in the network, so a community is a group of nodes, in which the connections between nodes in the same community are close, while the connections between communities are relatively sparse.In the MOEA/D-net algorithm [19], the module density function D, as shown in formula (2), is decomposed into two different aspects of a society and are divided into 2 evaluation functions: Ration Association (RA) and Ration Cut (RC). In order to convert them into a minimization problem, the function Ration Association (RA) invert gets Negative Ratio Association (NRA), and the optimal solution is obtained by minimizing the NRA and RC set:(2)D=∑i=1kLVi,Vi−LVi,Vi¯Vi,where k is the number of community, I ∈ {1, 2,·· , m}, Vi is the set of all nodes within community i,V¯i is the set of nodes connected externally by community i, |Vi | is the number of internal nodes within community i, L (Vi, Vi) is the number of edges within community i, and LVi,V¯i is the number of edges between community i and external nodes.The ratio of community internal connection NRA and the ratio of community external connection RC are taken as the objective function. RC is the sum of the density of connections between communities, and NRA is the sum of the density of connections between nodes in the community, as shown in formula (3), where Vi∈P,Vi¯=P−Vi,LVi,Vi=∑i,j∈ViAij, LVi,Vi¯=∑i∈Vi,j∈Vi¯Aij:(3)minNRA=−∑i=1mLVi,ViVi,RC=∑i=1mLVi,V¯iVi.Through minimizing the NRA and RC functions, communities are found with dense internal connections and sparse internal connections. The optimization ofRC function can reduce the number of communities and increase the number of nodes in the community. These two objective functions can balance the effect of reducing or increasing the number of communities.


### 2.3. Brain Storm Optimization Algorithm

Brain storm optimization algorithm (BSO) is a random optimization algorithm based on human brain storm process where a group of people with different backgrounds are gathered to brainstorm on the same problem, propose a large number of ideas for the problem to be solved, and finally obtain the optimal solution through mutual communication and thought fusion. It has novel ideas and strong global searching capability. In the algorithm, the search strategy based on grouping operation enhances the search capability, and the individual update method increases the diversity of solutions and makes use of the advantages of human intelligence in dealing with problems. Thus, it can be seen that it is a very potential algorithm, which can produce results beyond the classical intelligent algorithm.At present, the brain storm optimization algorithm has been successfully applied to solve complex, nonconvex, and NP-difficult problems with highly correlated variables. The brainstorming optimization algorithm clusters information with the clustering method. The clustering center in each class is the optimal value of the class. The cooperation among the classes and the perturbation of the clustering operation make the algorithm jump out of the local optimal and carry out the global search, thus ensuring the convergence performance of the algorithm through the optimization process of the clustering center.The process of K-means clustering adopted by BSO algorithm is relatively complex. For this reason, Shi [23] proposed a clustering-based brain storm optimization algorithm in objective space (BSO-OS). After the objective space is sorted, several optimal individuals are selected as elite groups and other individuals as ordinary groups. The algorithm has been improved on the clustering operation, which makes the algorithm faster and more time-efficient. However, because the classification method is too simple, the population diversity cannot be guaranteed during the evolution process.Multiobjective brain storm optimization (MOBSO) saves Pareto optimal solutions by setting the strategy of archive set and eventually obtains a set of uniform solutions close enough to the optimal frontier. MOBSO can solve the optimization problem of the two objectives well and be applied to practice. However, it is found that MOBSO increases the algorithm complexity and reduces the operation efficiency due to clustering and variation, while the increase of objective function has led to the evolution slowdown and the low efficiency of diversity maintenance strategy. Therefore, it is necessary to redesign the objective space and design the novelty search mechanism to settle the above problems. Section3 focuses on the novelty search mechanism.


## 2.1. Multiobjective Optimization Problem

The problem of multiobjective optimization is to find a compromise solution among the conflicting objectives through the mutual restriction of decision variables. The solution can simultaneously make multiple subobjective functions as optimal as possible. It can be modeled as the following equation:(1)minFX=f1x,f2x,…,fkxTs.tgix≤0,i=1,2,…,phi=0,i=1,2,…q,where x=x1,x2,...,xm∈Ω represents the m dimension decision vector, where m means the dimension of the decision vector and Ω is the feasible region of the decision space. Multiobjective optimization problem is to optimize the function vector minFX=minf1x,f2x,…,fkxT, where k is the number of objective functions. The objective function F (X) is composed of k functions mapped from the feasible region of the decision space to the objective space, where gi≤0, i=1,2,…,p, is p inequality constraints, and hi=0, i=1,2,…,q, is q equality constraints.The following are some important definitions of a domination-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm.Definition 1.
(Pareto dominance). In the decision vectorXA, XB∈ Ω, if and only if i=1,2,…,k, it is arbitrary, XA is dominant XB, and f (x) dominant relation is consistent with x dominant relation;Definition 2.
(Pareto optimal solution). Assuming that there is a decision variablex∗ in the feasible decision space Ω, if there is no decision variable x ∈ Ω like x > x∗, the decision variable x∗ is called the Pareto optimal solution.Definition 3.
(Pareto optimal solution set). The set consisting of all noninferior optimal solutions is called the optimal solution set of the multiobjective optimization problem, also known as Pareto optimal solution set.


## 2.2. Multiobjective Community Detection

A concrete network can be modeled as an undirected graphG = (V, E), where V is a set of nodes and E is a set of edges connecting two elements in V. If the network is composed of N nodes, the graph can be represented by an N × N adjacency matrix A, and the undirected graph shown in Figure 1 is represented by a symmetric adjacency matrix. Its adjacency matrix A is A symmetric matrix. When Aij = 1, it means that there is an edge connection between node I and node J, and when Aij = 0, it means that there is an infinite connection between the two nodes.Figure 1
Adjacency matrix represents an undirected graph.Radicchi et al. [22] gave the definition of community in an undirected network. Supposing there is a subgraph S ⊂ G and node i is a node in the subgraph S, the degree of node i is defined as KiS=KiinS+KioutS. KiinS=∑j∈sAij represents the internal degree of node i, that is, the number of edges between node i and other nodes in subgraph S. KioutS=∑j∉sAij represents the external degree of node i, namely, the number of node edges outside node i and subgraph S. Communities are obtained by categorizing the structural information of nodes in the network, so a community is a group of nodes, in which the connections between nodes in the same community are close, while the connections between communities are relatively sparse.In the MOEA/D-net algorithm [19], the module density function D, as shown in formula (2), is decomposed into two different aspects of a society and are divided into 2 evaluation functions: Ration Association (RA) and Ration Cut (RC). In order to convert them into a minimization problem, the function Ration Association (RA) invert gets Negative Ratio Association (NRA), and the optimal solution is obtained by minimizing the NRA and RC set:(2)D=∑i=1kLVi,Vi−LVi,Vi¯Vi,where k is the number of community, I ∈ {1, 2,·· , m}, Vi is the set of all nodes within community i,V¯i is the set of nodes connected externally by community i, |Vi | is the number of internal nodes within community i, L (Vi, Vi) is the number of edges within community i, and LVi,V¯i is the number of edges between community i and external nodes.The ratio of community internal connection NRA and the ratio of community external connection RC are taken as the objective function. RC is the sum of the density of connections between communities, and NRA is the sum of the density of connections between nodes in the community, as shown in formula (3), where Vi∈P,Vi¯=P−Vi,LVi,Vi=∑i,j∈ViAij, LVi,Vi¯=∑i∈Vi,j∈Vi¯Aij:(3)minNRA=−∑i=1mLVi,ViVi,RC=∑i=1mLVi,V¯iVi.Through minimizing the NRA and RC functions, communities are found with dense internal connections and sparse internal connections. The optimization ofRC function can reduce the number of communities and increase the number of nodes in the community. These two objective functions can balance the effect of reducing or increasing the number of communities.


## 2.3. Brain Storm Optimization Algorithm

Brain storm optimization algorithm (BSO) is a random optimization algorithm based on human brain storm process where a group of people with different backgrounds are gathered to brainstorm on the same problem, propose a large number of ideas for the problem to be solved, and finally obtain the optimal solution through mutual communication and thought fusion. It has novel ideas and strong global searching capability. In the algorithm, the search strategy based on grouping operation enhances the search capability, and the individual update method increases the diversity of solutions and makes use of the advantages of human intelligence in dealing with problems. Thus, it can be seen that it is a very potential algorithm, which can produce results beyond the classical intelligent algorithm.At present, the brain storm optimization algorithm has been successfully applied to solve complex, nonconvex, and NP-difficult problems with highly correlated variables. The brainstorming optimization algorithm clusters information with the clustering method. The clustering center in each class is the optimal value of the class. The cooperation among the classes and the perturbation of the clustering operation make the algorithm jump out of the local optimal and carry out the global search, thus ensuring the convergence performance of the algorithm through the optimization process of the clustering center.The process of K-means clustering adopted by BSO algorithm is relatively complex. For this reason, Shi [23] proposed a clustering-based brain storm optimization algorithm in objective space (BSO-OS). After the objective space is sorted, several optimal individuals are selected as elite groups and other individuals as ordinary groups. The algorithm has been improved on the clustering operation, which makes the algorithm faster and more time-efficient. However, because the classification method is too simple, the population diversity cannot be guaranteed during the evolution process.Multiobjective brain storm optimization (MOBSO) saves Pareto optimal solutions by setting the strategy of archive set and eventually obtains a set of uniform solutions close enough to the optimal frontier. MOBSO can solve the optimization problem of the two objectives well and be applied to practice. However, it is found that MOBSO increases the algorithm complexity and reduces the operation efficiency due to clustering and variation, while the increase of objective function has led to the evolution slowdown and the low efficiency of diversity maintenance strategy. Therefore, it is necessary to redesign the objective space and design the novelty search mechanism to settle the above problems. Section3 focuses on the novelty search mechanism.


## 3. Multiobjective Brain Storm Community Detection Method Based on Novelty Search

### 3.1. Novelty Search Mechanism

In each generation of evolutionary agents, traditional evolutionary algorithms, with a method of a single population search, select the best performing individual to produce offspring according to some metric, but this single selection will cause a loss of diversity. To solve this problem, a multipopulation parallel search based on elite, ordinary, and novelty clusters is used to enhance the diversity of the algorithm. In novelty searching, though the novelty individual is not based on the optimal fitness in the target search, it is the solution far away from the best individual, so it is selected as the starting point for further evolution in this mechanism. This search mechanism can correct for the loss of diversity and stagnation of evolution in a single evolutionary population.Figure2 shows the schematic diagram of novelty search mechanism, in which point A represents the local best, point B represents the global best, and point C represents the novelty solution. Obviously, between point C and the global optimal point B is less than that between point C and the local optimal point A. In the iteration process, the novelty searching mechanism searches from different positions and selects the solution opposite to the current optimal fitness as the novelty solution, which ensures the balance of population diversity and convergence to a great extent and has good robustness.Figure 2
Novelty search mechanism.According to the above mechanism, in complex network community detection, traditional evolutionary algorithms often choose the maximum value ofNMI as the starting point of continuous evolution, while here, the most novel individual, namely, the minimum value of NMI, is selected as the novelty solution by maximizing novelty measurement. Under the specific operation, the external archive set (storing elite solutions) and the current generated population are utilized to perform nondominant ranking, the NMI value of the solution obtained from the external archive is compared with that of the original population, and the one with the lowest NMI value is taken as the novelty individual. In the individual renewal strategy, two new solutions are generated as the elite solution and the novel solution by the two-point cross fusion of the external archived solution.


### 3.2. The Overall Flow of the Algorithm

In this paper, a multiobjective brain storm optimization based on novelty search (MOBSO-NS) community detection method is proposed to design a novelty search strategy, where the objective space is divided into elite cluster, the common cluster, and novelty cluster, among which, the novelty cluster is the smallest among the individuals with theNMI value as a novelty solution. At present, many swarm intelligence optimization algorithms replace traditional selection models with mutation methods to generate new individuals, which increases the diversity of information, prevents the algorithm from falling into local optimum, and enhances the algorithm’s global search ability. In MOBSO-OS, the offspring are generated by the cross-fusion of elite solutions and novel solutions, which effectively maintains the diversity of the population. As the search process progresses, the individual solutions gradually get better, making the gap between each solution smaller. At this point, even if the interaction of individuals in the population is used to reach the optimal solution, the population may fall into the local optimal solution. The strategy of restarting is used to help individuals escape from the local optimal point, avoid "precocity" caused by premature convergence, form a single optimal solution, and improve the global searching ability of the population. The external archive is set to save Pareto optimal solution. In each iteration, the nondominant solution is sorted into the nondominant solution in the external archive and then updated to finally obtain a set of Pareto optimal solutions.The flowchart of multiobjective brainstorm community detection method based on novelty search is presented in Figure3.Figure 3
Flowchart of complex network community detection.Steps of MOBSO-NS algorithm for detecting complex network communities:Step 1: read the input network and initialize the algorithm by means of the neighbor node-based LAR coding, as shown in Figure4.Step 2: randomly generate the initialpopNum solutions and calculate the NRA and RC values of the initial solutions by formula (3).Step 3: update the external archive EP including all the solutions in the population.Step 4: elite individuals are disturbed. An individualC1 is randomly selected from the external archive EP to generate new individuals.Step 5: obtain the novelty solution, calculate theNMI value between the solution in the external archive EP and the solution of the original population, and take the solution with small NMI value as the novelty solution.Step 6: randomly select individualsC1 and C2 from the external archive and the current population to generate new individuals by two-point crossover fusion of elite solution and ordinary solution to generate new individuals.Step 7: randomly select individualsC1 and C2 from external archives and novelty solution to generate new individuals by the cross fusion of elite individuals and novel individuals.Step 8: calculate theNRA and RC values for the new population and update the external archive.Step 9: when the external archiveQ is not updated or the number of iterations p is reached, the restart operation is performed, returning to step 2.Step 10: determine whether the termination condition is met. If so, calculate theQ value and the maximum NMI value of the external archive, otherwise, return to step 4.Step 11: output a set of Pareto frontiers, that is, a set of partition network structures.Figure 4
Encoding and decoding modes based on neighbor nodes. (a) A network with 11 nodes. (b) Encoding method based on neighbor nodes. (c) Decoded connected subgraph.
(a)(b)(c)


### 3.3. Coding Method Based on Neighbor Node

The encoding method based on neighbor nodes is adopted in this paper. All nodes in the graph are first numbered, then the neighbors of each node are sorted according to their numbers, and eventually the neighbor ordered table is obtained. In this coding method based on neighbor node, nodes located in the same connected subgraph are divided into a community so that each individual is valid and no illegal solution will occur, thus ensuring the convergence of the algorithm, and there is no need to know the number of partitioned communities in advance, which can be obtained through the decoding process.The encoding method based on neighbor nodes consists of four steps: determining the neighbor set of each node, selecting the neighbor of each node, constructing the encoding list, and carrying out the decoding process. Taking Figure4 as an example, the process is as follows.


#### 3.3.1. Determine the Neighbor Set of Each Node

In a network topology, all nodes to which each node is connected via an edge are called the set of neighbors of that node. Figure4(a) shows the topological structure of 11 nodes. Taking node 7 as an example, the number of the nodes it connects are 4, 6, and 8, respectively, that is, the neighbor set of node7 is {4, 6, 8}.


#### 3.3.2. Select the Neighbor of Each Node

Each node will randomly select a neighbor from the neighbor set as the neighbor of the current node. If the corresponding gene value of the No.i node is j, it can be interpreted as there is an edge connection between node i and node j. According to the seventh node with ID 7 in Figure 4(b), the gene value is taken as 8. In the corresponding figure, there is an edge from between nodes 7 and 8.


#### 3.3.3. Construct the Encoding List

The list of each node and its randomly selected neighbors is defined as the encoding list, as shown in Figure4(b). Position refers to the node position, and genotype means the gene bit formed by randomly selected neighbors of each node.


#### 3.3.4. Decoding Process

Decoding is the process of converting the encoded list into the community structure corresponding to the figure. All community divisions need to be identified during the decoding process, as shown in Figure4(c). The network is divided into three communities, {1, 2, 3}, {3, 4, 6, 7, 8}, and {9, 10, 11}.


### 3.4. Update the External Archive

An external archive is set up in the algorithm to save the nondominant solution obtained by the algorithm after searching. After the objective value of the individual is calculated, each individual needs to be compared with other individuals in the population to determine whether it is a nondominant solution, that is, the more solutions stored in the external archive are , the more representative the Pareto frontier becomes.In this paper, the solutions in the population and the solutions in the external archive are sorted in a nondominant way to update the external archive. In the iteration search phase, if a new nondominant solution is more dominant than the elements in the library, the elements in the library will be removed from the library, and if the nondominant solution in the newly generated population is dominated by some members of the library, the nondominant solution cannot enter the library.


### 3.5. Restart Policy

In the process of population iteration, the failure of an individual to constantly update its position means that the individual has been in the best position. If the individual is not helped to escape from this point in time, as the group evolves, more and more individuals will gather around the optimal point. If the greatest advantage, for the local optimal point, is "premature" phenomenon in a group, the ability to explore new global optimal solution will be lost. In order to overcome this defect, MOBSO-NS algorithm adopts a restart strategy to help individuals jump out of the local optimal in time and maintain global search ability of the group.In Algorithm1, the restart judgment conditions are divided into the following two points:(1)
In the iteration process, if the external nondominant population is the same forQ times continuously, the population is considered to converge to the local optimal when Q times are not renewed. In this paper, Q is referred to as the maximum number of times the external archive has not been updated, and the value of Q is determined based on different datasets.(2)
P is the maximum number of iterations to restart. If the number of iterations reaches P, the restart strategy will be executed.Algorithm 1:Restart policy.
(1)
IftempRestart = = Q or tempIter = = P do:(2)
go to Algorithm2 step 3


### 3.6. Multiobjective Brain Storm Optimization Community Detection Method Based on Novelty Search

The framework of multiobjective brain storm optimization community detection method based on novelty search is shown in the figure below, wherePops is the initial population list, EP is the external archive, tempRestart is the number of times that the external archive has not been updated, and tempIter is the number of iterations. The overall algorithm framework of MOBSO-NS is shown in Algorithm 2.Algorithm 2:MOBSO-NS.
Input: the edge set data of complex network, the maximum number of iterations of the algorithmmaxIter, the population size popNum, and the proportion of the three new individuals generating the new population are different α, β, γ (α+β+γ = 1); Q is the maximum number of times that the partial archive has not been updated, and P is the maximum number of iterations restarted.Output: a group of network communities are divided into structures.(1)
Initialize:Pops = ∅, EP = ∅(2)
Fori = 1 to popNum do:(3)
The LAR code is used to randomly generate an initial solutions, as shown in Figure 4, and the NRA and RC values for s are calculated according to formula (2).(4)
Adds to Pops.(5)
End For(6)
Iterative search:(7)
Foriter = 1 to maxIterdo:(8)
Fors in popNumdo:(9)
If no solution in EP can dominate sdo(10)
Adds to EP, and remove all solutions in EP that can be dominated by s.(11)
End If(12)
End For(13)
newPops = ∅。(14)
Individual update(15)
Restart(16)
End For(17)
Calculate the indicator value:(18)
Fors in EP do:(19)
Calculate theQ value and NMI value of s。。(20)
End For(21)
Return the two solutionsSI and S2 a maximum value of 0 and NMI in EPIndividual renewal adopts three strategies: first, elite cluster generates part of the new population through mutation; second, elite cluster and ordinary cluster are fused to generate part of the new population; and third, elite cluster and novelty cluster are fused to generate part of the new population to maintain the population diversity. The specific process is shown in Algorithm3.Algorithm 3:Individual update strategy.
//The elite cluster generates part of the new population through mutation(1)
Fori = 1 to popNum∗α(2)
Randomly select a solutionP1 from EP, and then perform a mutation operation to generate a new solution C1.(3)
Calculate theNRA and RC values of C1 and add C1 to newPops。(4)
End For//Elite clusters and ordinary clusters are fused to generate a new population.(5)
Fori = 1 to popNum∗β/2(6)
Randomly select a solutionP1 and P2 from EP and Pops, and perform the fusion operation (two-point crossover) operation(7)
Generate two new solutionsC1 and C2.(8)
Calculate theNRA and RC values of C1 and C2, and add C1 and C2 to newPops.(9)
End For//Elite clusters and novelty clusters merge are fused to generate some new populations.(10)
Fori = 1 to popNum∗λ/2(11)
Randomly select a solutionP1 from the EP, calculate the NMI value of all solutions in P1 and Pops, and select the P2 corresponding to the solution with the smallest NMI value. Perform a fusion operation (two-point crossover) into two new solutions C1 and C2.Calculate theNRA and RC values of C1 and C2, and add C1 and C2 to newPops.(12)
End For


## 3.1. Novelty Search Mechanism

In each generation of evolutionary agents, traditional evolutionary algorithms, with a method of a single population search, select the best performing individual to produce offspring according to some metric, but this single selection will cause a loss of diversity. To solve this problem, a multipopulation parallel search based on elite, ordinary, and novelty clusters is used to enhance the diversity of the algorithm. In novelty searching, though the novelty individual is not based on the optimal fitness in the target search, it is the solution far away from the best individual, so it is selected as the starting point for further evolution in this mechanism. This search mechanism can correct for the loss of diversity and stagnation of evolution in a single evolutionary population.Figure2 shows the schematic diagram of novelty search mechanism, in which point A represents the local best, point B represents the global best, and point C represents the novelty solution. Obviously, between point C and the global optimal point B is less than that between point C and the local optimal point A. In the iteration process, the novelty searching mechanism searches from different positions and selects the solution opposite to the current optimal fitness as the novelty solution, which ensures the balance of population diversity and convergence to a great extent and has good robustness.Figure 2
Novelty search mechanism.According to the above mechanism, in complex network community detection, traditional evolutionary algorithms often choose the maximum value ofNMI as the starting point of continuous evolution, while here, the most novel individual, namely, the minimum value of NMI, is selected as the novelty solution by maximizing novelty measurement. Under the specific operation, the external archive set (storing elite solutions) and the current generated population are utilized to perform nondominant ranking, the NMI value of the solution obtained from the external archive is compared with that of the original population, and the one with the lowest NMI value is taken as the novelty individual. In the individual renewal strategy, two new solutions are generated as the elite solution and the novel solution by the two-point cross fusion of the external archived solution.


## 3.2. The Overall Flow of the Algorithm

In this paper, a multiobjective brain storm optimization based on novelty search (MOBSO-NS) community detection method is proposed to design a novelty search strategy, where the objective space is divided into elite cluster, the common cluster, and novelty cluster, among which, the novelty cluster is the smallest among the individuals with theNMI value as a novelty solution. At present, many swarm intelligence optimization algorithms replace traditional selection models with mutation methods to generate new individuals, which increases the diversity of information, prevents the algorithm from falling into local optimum, and enhances the algorithm’s global search ability. In MOBSO-OS, the offspring are generated by the cross-fusion of elite solutions and novel solutions, which effectively maintains the diversity of the population. As the search process progresses, the individual solutions gradually get better, making the gap between each solution smaller. At this point, even if the interaction of individuals in the population is used to reach the optimal solution, the population may fall into the local optimal solution. The strategy of restarting is used to help individuals escape from the local optimal point, avoid "precocity" caused by premature convergence, form a single optimal solution, and improve the global searching ability of the population. The external archive is set to save Pareto optimal solution. In each iteration, the nondominant solution is sorted into the nondominant solution in the external archive and then updated to finally obtain a set of Pareto optimal solutions.The flowchart of multiobjective brainstorm community detection method based on novelty search is presented in Figure3.Figure 3
Flowchart of complex network community detection.Steps of MOBSO-NS algorithm for detecting complex network communities:Step 1: read the input network and initialize the algorithm by means of the neighbor node-based LAR coding, as shown in Figure4.Step 2: randomly generate the initialpopNum solutions and calculate the NRA and RC values of the initial solutions by formula (3).Step 3: update the external archive EP including all the solutions in the population.Step 4: elite individuals are disturbed. An individualC1 is randomly selected from the external archive EP to generate new individuals.Step 5: obtain the novelty solution, calculate theNMI value between the solution in the external archive EP and the solution of the original population, and take the solution with small NMI value as the novelty solution.Step 6: randomly select individualsC1 and C2 from the external archive and the current population to generate new individuals by two-point crossover fusion of elite solution and ordinary solution to generate new individuals.Step 7: randomly select individualsC1 and C2 from external archives and novelty solution to generate new individuals by the cross fusion of elite individuals and novel individuals.Step 8: calculate theNRA and RC values for the new population and update the external archive.Step 9: when the external archiveQ is not updated or the number of iterations p is reached, the restart operation is performed, returning to step 2.Step 10: determine whether the termination condition is met. If so, calculate theQ value and the maximum NMI value of the external archive, otherwise, return to step 4.Step 11: output a set of Pareto frontiers, that is, a set of partition network structures.Figure 4
Encoding and decoding modes based on neighbor nodes. (a) A network with 11 nodes. (b) Encoding method based on neighbor nodes. (c) Decoded connected subgraph.
(a)(b)(c)


## 3.3. Coding Method Based on Neighbor Node

The encoding method based on neighbor nodes is adopted in this paper. All nodes in the graph are first numbered, then the neighbors of each node are sorted according to their numbers, and eventually the neighbor ordered table is obtained. In this coding method based on neighbor node, nodes located in the same connected subgraph are divided into a community so that each individual is valid and no illegal solution will occur, thus ensuring the convergence of the algorithm, and there is no need to know the number of partitioned communities in advance, which can be obtained through the decoding process.The encoding method based on neighbor nodes consists of four steps: determining the neighbor set of each node, selecting the neighbor of each node, constructing the encoding list, and carrying out the decoding process. Taking Figure4 as an example, the process is as follows.


### 3.3.1. Determine the Neighbor Set of Each Node

In a network topology, all nodes to which each node is connected via an edge are called the set of neighbors of that node. Figure4(a) shows the topological structure of 11 nodes. Taking node 7 as an example, the number of the nodes it connects are 4, 6, and 8, respectively, that is, the neighbor set of node7 is {4, 6, 8}.


### 3.3.2. Select the Neighbor of Each Node

Each node will randomly select a neighbor from the neighbor set as the neighbor of the current node. If the corresponding gene value of the No.i node is j, it can be interpreted as there is an edge connection between node i and node j. According to the seventh node with ID 7 in Figure 4(b), the gene value is taken as 8. In the corresponding figure, there is an edge from between nodes 7 and 8.


### 3.3.3. Construct the Encoding List

The list of each node and its randomly selected neighbors is defined as the encoding list, as shown in Figure4(b). Position refers to the node position, and genotype means the gene bit formed by randomly selected neighbors of each node.


### 3.3.4. Decoding Process

Decoding is the process of converting the encoded list into the community structure corresponding to the figure. All community divisions need to be identified during the decoding process, as shown in Figure4(c). The network is divided into three communities, {1, 2, 3}, {3, 4, 6, 7, 8}, and {9, 10, 11}.


## 3.3.1. Determine the Neighbor Set of Each Node

In a network topology, all nodes to which each node is connected via an edge are called the set of neighbors of that node. Figure4(a) shows the topological structure of 11 nodes. Taking node 7 as an example, the number of the nodes it connects are 4, 6, and 8, respectively, that is, the neighbor set of node7 is {4, 6, 8}.


## 3.3.2. Select the Neighbor of Each Node

Each node will randomly select a neighbor from the neighbor set as the neighbor of the current node. If the corresponding gene value of the No.i node is j, it can be interpreted as there is an edge connection between node i and node j. According to the seventh node with ID 7 in Figure 4(b), the gene value is taken as 8. In the corresponding figure, there is an edge from between nodes 7 and 8.


## 3.3.3. Construct the Encoding List

The list of each node and its randomly selected neighbors is defined as the encoding list, as shown in Figure4(b). Position refers to the node position, and genotype means the gene bit formed by randomly selected neighbors of each node.


## 3.3.4. Decoding Process

Decoding is the process of converting the encoded list into the community structure corresponding to the figure. All community divisions need to be identified during the decoding process, as shown in Figure4(c). The network is divided into three communities, {1, 2, 3}, {3, 4, 6, 7, 8}, and {9, 10, 11}.


## 3.4. Update the External Archive

An external archive is set up in the algorithm to save the nondominant solution obtained by the algorithm after searching. After the objective value of the individual is calculated, each individual needs to be compared with other individuals in the population to determine whether it is a nondominant solution, that is, the more solutions stored in the external archive are , the more representative the Pareto frontier becomes.In this paper, the solutions in the population and the solutions in the external archive are sorted in a nondominant way to update the external archive. In the iteration search phase, if a new nondominant solution is more dominant than the elements in the library, the elements in the library will be removed from the library, and if the nondominant solution in the newly generated population is dominated by some members of the library, the nondominant solution cannot enter the library.


## 3.5. Restart Policy

In the process of population iteration, the failure of an individual to constantly update its position means that the individual has been in the best position. If the individual is not helped to escape from this point in time, as the group evolves, more and more individuals will gather around the optimal point. If the greatest advantage, for the local optimal point, is "premature" phenomenon in a group, the ability to explore new global optimal solution will be lost. In order to overcome this defect, MOBSO-NS algorithm adopts a restart strategy to help individuals jump out of the local optimal in time and maintain global search ability of the group.In Algorithm1, the restart judgment conditions are divided into the following two points:(1)
In the iteration process, if the external nondominant population is the same forQ times continuously, the population is considered to converge to the local optimal when Q times are not renewed. In this paper, Q is referred to as the maximum number of times the external archive has not been updated, and the value of Q is determined based on different datasets.(2)
P is the maximum number of iterations to restart. If the number of iterations reaches P, the restart strategy will be executed.Algorithm 1:Restart policy.
(1)
IftempRestart = = Q or tempIter = = P do:(2)
go to Algorithm2 step 3


## 3.6. Multiobjective Brain Storm Optimization Community Detection Method Based on Novelty Search

The framework of multiobjective brain storm optimization community detection method based on novelty search is shown in the figure below, wherePops is the initial population list, EP is the external archive, tempRestart is the number of times that the external archive has not been updated, and tempIter is the number of iterations. The overall algorithm framework of MOBSO-NS is shown in Algorithm 2.Algorithm 2:MOBSO-NS.
Input: the edge set data of complex network, the maximum number of iterations of the algorithmmaxIter, the population size popNum, and the proportion of the three new individuals generating the new population are different α, β, γ (α+β+γ = 1); Q is the maximum number of times that the partial archive has not been updated, and P is the maximum number of iterations restarted.Output: a group of network communities are divided into structures.(1)
Initialize:Pops = ∅, EP = ∅(2)
Fori = 1 to popNum do:(3)
The LAR code is used to randomly generate an initial solutions, as shown in Figure 4, and the NRA and RC values for s are calculated according to formula (2).(4)
Adds to Pops.(5)
End For(6)
Iterative search:(7)
Foriter = 1 to maxIterdo:(8)
Fors in popNumdo:(9)
If no solution in EP can dominate sdo(10)
Adds to EP, and remove all solutions in EP that can be dominated by s.(11)
End If(12)
End For(13)
newPops = ∅。(14)
Individual update(15)
Restart(16)
End For(17)
Calculate the indicator value:(18)
Fors in EP do:(19)
Calculate theQ value and NMI value of s。。(20)
End For(21)
Return the two solutionsSI and S2 a maximum value of 0 and NMI in EPIndividual renewal adopts three strategies: first, elite cluster generates part of the new population through mutation; second, elite cluster and ordinary cluster are fused to generate part of the new population; and third, elite cluster and novelty cluster are fused to generate part of the new population to maintain the population diversity. The specific process is shown in Algorithm3.Algorithm 3:Individual update strategy.
//The elite cluster generates part of the new population through mutation(1)
Fori = 1 to popNum∗α(2)
Randomly select a solutionP1 from EP, and then perform a mutation operation to generate a new solution C1.(3)
Calculate theNRA and RC values of C1 and add C1 to newPops。(4)
End For//Elite clusters and ordinary clusters are fused to generate a new population.(5)
Fori = 1 to popNum∗β/2(6)
Randomly select a solutionP1 and P2 from EP and Pops, and perform the fusion operation (two-point crossover) operation(7)
Generate two new solutionsC1 and C2.(8)
Calculate theNRA and RC values of C1 and C2, and add C1 and C2 to newPops.(9)
End For//Elite clusters and novelty clusters merge are fused to generate some new populations.(10)
Fori = 1 to popNum∗λ/2(11)
Randomly select a solutionP1 from the EP, calculate the NMI value of all solutions in P1 and Pops, and select the P2 corresponding to the solution with the smallest NMI value. Perform a fusion operation (two-point crossover) into two new solutions C1 and C2.Calculate theNRA and RC values of C1 and C2, and add C1 and C2 to newPops.(12)
End For


## 4. Experiment and Analysis

### 4.1. Dataset

Comparing with other related methods, the MBSO-OS algorithm was experimentally analyzed in four real networks including Zachary’s karate club, the Bottlenose dolphins, the American college football, and the books about US Politics by comparing with other related methods.The network of Zachary’s karate club represents a social relationship between 34 members of a university karate club in the United States, where each node represents a member, and the edge between two nodes means that the corresponding two members are friends in frequent contacts. Due to the differences between the club management and the coaches, the club was finally divided into two: the coach-centered team was split from the club, forming a new club, while the manager-centered team remained at the club. The network has a total of 34 nodes and 78 links.The dolphin network is an animal social network constructed by Lusseau by observing 62 dolphins of different genders in New Zealand’s Doubtful Bay. Each node in the network represents a dolphin. If two dolphins are closely connected, there will be an edge connection between the corresponding vertices of the dolphins that are naturally divided into two communities: male and female groups.The network of the American college football has a total of 77 nodes with 121 edges. The nodes in the network represent football teams, and the edge between the nodes indicates that a game has already been played between the two teams.The political books’ network edited by Krebs consists of 105 nodes and 441 edges. The nodes represent books on American politics from Amazon, and the edges between the two nodes indicate that the two books are frequently purchased together. Newman divided the books into different parts in light of the political views of the book, with a few exceptions.Table1 shows the number of nodes and edges of the four real networks.Table 1
Network in the experiment.
NetworksNodesEdgesKarate3478Dolphins62159Football77121Political books105441


### 4.2. Introduction to Evaluation Indexes

Currently, the most widely used community quality evaluation index is theQ value function developed by Newman and Girva [24]. The modularity of Q is defined as follows:(4)Q=∑i=1Keim−di2m2.By studying the related problems of complex network clustering based on optimization methods, the algorithm selects the two most common community quality evaluation indicators (Q, NMI) as the objective function.The standard of modularity is a measure of the degree of goodness of the identified communities in the network. It is considered that the larger theQ value, the stronger the community structure. The modularity is defined as the score of the edges falling into the community minus the expected probability of random allocation of these edges, and the edges are randomly added to the network, independent of the community structure. k is the number of clusters found in the network, ei is the total number of edges connecting nodes in cluster i, di is the sum of nodes in cluster i, and m is the total number of edges in the network. The standard of modularity is generally within the range of [−0.5, 1], whereas most practical networks have a modularity value within the range of [0.3, 0.7], where a value greater than 0.3 indicates an important community structure.Normalized mutual information (NMI) measures the similarity between the actual classification of societies and the detected societies. According to information theory, normalized mutual information NMI (A, B) is defined as follows:(5)NMIA,B=−2∑i=1CA∑j=1CBCijlogCijn/Ci.C.j∑i=1CACi.logCi./n+∑j=1CBC.jlogC.j/n.Set two partitions of the network asA and B, and let C represent the mixed matrix and its element Cij the number of nodes that appear in communities Ai ∈ A, Bj ∈ B.Among them,CA and CB, respectively, signify the number of communities in the partition of A and B, Ci. represents the sum of the elements in matrix C, over row i, C.j indicates the sum of elements in matrix C, over column j, and n is the number of nodes in the network. The value of NMI ranges from 0 and 1. If A and B are completely consistent, the maximum value of NMI is 1, while if A and B are completely inconsistent, for example, the whole network is detected as A community, the minimum value of NMI is 0.


### 4.3. Parameter Setting

In order to verify the detection performance of the algorithm proposed in this paper, python3.7 was used to program the algorithm under the MAC OSX environment. The performance of the algorithm was simulated using real networks, respectively, and the test results were measured with standardized normalized mutual information. The maximum number of iterations of all datasets is set as 160, and the population number of popNum is set as 100 for each dataset. The objective space is divided into elite cluster, novelty cluster, and ordinary cluster. The proportions of new population α generated by mutation of elite cluster, new population β generated by the fusion of elite cluster and ordinary cluster, and new population λ generated by the fusion of elite cluster and novelty cluster are set as 0.5, 0.4, and 0.1, respectively, and the EP (external archive has not been updated) restart parameter Q is 5, and the number of iterations restart parameter P is 20.


### 4.4. Test Results and Analysis

#### 4.4.1. MOBSO-NS Test Results

For each network, the algorithm runs 30 times. After each run, the bestQ value and NMI value are selected for segmentation and recording. After 30 runs, the average is taken between the best Q value and NMI each time. The results are shown in Table 2. From the results of Zachary’s karate club network and Bottlenose dolphins’ experiments, it can be seen that the MOBSO-NS NMI value reaches the maximum value of 1, which indicates that the results of the community detected by the algorithm are the same as the real community division. The American College Football also has an NMI value of close to 1. For the Q value, the four network division results are between 0.3 and 0.7.Table 2
MOBSO-NS experimental results.
NetworkKarateDolphinFootballPolitical booksNMImax110.93670.6287NMIavg110.92290.6101Qmax0.41980.52200.60440.5269Qavg0.41980.52200.60230.5269


#### 4.4.2. Parameter Analysis

There are three individual generation operations in the algorithm, involving three parametersα, β, and λ, among which, α is the proportion of the offspring generated by the disturbance of the elite individual, β is the proportion of the new population generated by the fusion of the elite cluster and the ordinary cluster, and λ is the proportion of new populations generated by the fusion of elite clusters and novelty clusters. In order to ensure the validity of the experimental results, a higher weight should be assigned to the elite clusters, with ordinary clusters and novel clusters as an aid to maintain the diversity of the population, which means the value of α should be above 0.5. In this paper, the parameter α starts from 0.5 and gradually increases to 0.8 in steps of 0.1, β corresponds to 0.4, 0.2, 0.2, and 0.1, and λ is 0.1, 0.2, 0.1, and 0.1. The rest parameters remain unchanged. The statistics of NMImax, NMIavg, Qmax, and Qavg are performed on the test results as shown in Tables 3–5. Figures 5–8 are the NMIavg line graphs of the values of the three parameters α, β, and λ for four datasets: Zachary’s karate club, the Bottlenose dolphins, the American college football, and the political books.Table 3
The value of parameterα is 0.6, β is 0.2, and λ is 0.2
NetworkKarateDolphinsFootballPolitical booksNMImax110.92690.6310NMIavg110.90580.5985Qmax0.41980.52220.60440.5269Qavg0.41980.51950.59840.5259Table 4
The value of parameterα is 0.7, β is 0.2, and λ is 0.1
NetworkKarateDolphinsFootballPolitical booksNMImax110.92690.6313NMIavg10.99740.91020.6018Qmax0.41980.52380.60440.5269Qavg0.41950.52000.60000.5264Table 5
The value of parameterα is 0.8, β is 0.1, and λ is 0.1
NetworkKarateDolphinsFootballPolitical booksNMImax110.93610.6287NMIavg10.99630.90940.5972Qmax0.41980.52680.60460.5269Qavg0.41980.52110.60010.5260Figure 5
Line chart in karate whenα, β, and λ are given different values.Figure 6
Line chart in dolphins whenα, β, and λ are given different values.Figure 7
Line chart in football whenα, β, and λ are given different values.Figure 8
Line chart in political books whenα, β, and λ are given different values.From the experimental results in Tables3–5, it can be seen that although the values of Qmax and NMImax are higher than those in Table 2 on individual datasets, the maximum Q values and maximum NMI values that appear due to the randomness of the algorithm have no reference value, and their mean values are both less than those in Table 2. Therefore, the experimental results reach the best when α is 0.5, β is 0.4, and λ is 0.1.As can be seen from Figures5–8, among the four sets of different values of α, β, and λ, only when α is 0.5, β is 0.4, and λ is 0.1, NMImax, NMIavg, Qmax, and Qavg performed the best in four evaluation indexes. From the experimental results of the karate network, it can be found from the analysis in Figure 5 that NMI is 1 regardless of the value of α. This is because the size of the karate network is very small, α is the proportion of offspring generated by elite individual disturbance, and the changes of α, β, and λ have no effect on NMI. For the network, only when α is equal to 0.5, the result is the best, while when α is equal to 0.4, the NMI value decreases, and the scale of the network is larger than karate network, as shown in Figure 6. In Figures 7 and 8, a similar line graph appears. When α is 0.6, β is 0.2, and λ is 0.2, the NMI value is the smallest, which is caused by the large number of nodes in football network and political books’ network.Figures9 and 10, respectively, show the real communities detected on Zachary’s karate club network and dolphins social network through MOBSO-NS. The different colors of the nodes indicate different communities obtained by the algorithm.Figure 9
Karate.Figure 10
Dolphins.Figure11 shows the partition structure with the highest NMI value and Q value generated by the political book network through the MOBSO-NS algorithm. It can be seen that, for the partition with the highest NMI, the algorithm generates 3 communities, which are exactly equal to the number of correct communities in the political book network. That is to say, the MOBSO-NS algorithm can find a structure that is closer to the real structure.Figure 11
Political books.Figure12 shows the communities in which the MOBSO-NS algorithm detects the maximum NMI on the American college football network. MOBSO-NS produced 11 communities, but the correct number of communities in the soccer network was 12.Figure 12
Football.


### 4.5. Comparison of Qualities of Online Communities

In order to demonstrate the advantages of MOBSONS algorithm in community detection from various aspects, the experimental data of MOBSONS algorithm, MOLS-Net, MODPSO, MOEA/D-NET, and BGLL algorithm inNMImax, NMIavg, Qmax, and Qavg are compared, as shown in Table 6.Table 6
Comparison of network community quality.
NetworkIndexMOBSO-NSBSO-OSMOLS-NetMODPSOMOEA/D-NetBGLLKarateNMImax111110.7071NMIavg1110.972910.6280Qmax0.41980.41980.41980.41980.37150.4198Qavg0.41980.41980.41980.41380.37150.4118DolphinNMImax111110.6363NMIavg111110.5148Qmax0.52200.52690.52680.52680.37350.5277Qavg0.52200.52690.52370.51960.37350.5210FootballNMImax0.93670.93570.93610.92890.93670.8923NMIavg0.92290.92290.92730.92450.93340.8765Qmax0.60440.60440.60460.60320.60050.6046Qavg0.60230.60320.60440.59950.59930.6038Political booksNMImax0.62870.6254—0.59100.58950.4420NMIavg0.61010.5999—0.59100.58850.4420Qmax0.52690.5259—0.52630.52590.5186Qavg0.52690.5259—0.52630.52590.5186Among them, the multiobjective discrete particle swarm optimization (MODPSO) proposed by Gong et al. [15] designed a swarm optimization method specific to the problem of tag propagation, which adopted neighbor-based turbulence operators to produce different individuals and improve diversity, showing high clustering efficiency. Zhou et al. [20]. proposed the multiobjective local search (MOLS-NET) algorithm to express the community detection problem as a multiobjective optimization problem and then presented a multiobjective optimization algorithm based on local search. Different target local search methods designed can optimize two targets simultaneously. The BGLL algorithm is an aggregation algorithm proposed by Blondel et al. [25] based on the concept of modularity, which can be used to analyze the hierarchical structure of weighted networks. The MOEA/D-NET algorithm was designed by Gong etal. [14] to solve the community detection as a multiobjective optimization problem using the decomposition based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm. The proposed algorithm maximized the density of the interior degree and minimized the density of the exterior degree.Table6 describes the comparison results between MOBSO-NS proposed in this paper and other four algorithms on the four evaluation indexes. The network of karate and dolphins is simple because the real network is divided into two communities. The NMI value given by the algorithm in this paper is the same as that of the compared algorithm, both of which are 1. This results in the community structure of the two networks being divided accurately enough. As for the Q value, the MOBSO-NS is not the best in the network, but the NMI value of 1 indicates that the divided network is exactly the same as the real network, which does not affect the experimental results.For Zachary’s karate club network and the Bottlenose dolphins network, because the real network is relatively simple, two communities are divided. TheNMI value given by the algorithm in the paper is the same as that given by the compared algorithm, both of which are 1, indicating that these two networks have been accurately divided into network community structures. As for the Q value, although the performance of MOBSO-NS is not the best performance in dolphin network, the NMI value of 1 indicates that the partitioned network is completely consistent with the real network, which has no effect on the experimental results.The political books’ network is complex, and most existing methods fail to detect the true division of the network. MOBSO-NS is the result when the actual number of communities is unknown. Compared with those of MOLS-NET algorithm with the known actual number of communities, the experimental results of MOBSO-NS algorithm are more objective and accurate. In addition, it is clear from the contents recorded in Table6 that the experimental results in the political books’ network and the community quality are much higher than those of the other four known algorithms.In the American college football network, the real network has 12 community divisions. For theQ value, MOLS-NET is superior to all comparison algorithms. Due to the complexity of the network, no algorithm can realize the real partition structure. Other algorithms perform better than MOBSO-NS in terms of the average Q because the American college football league network is essentially a network with numerous and difficult community divisions. However, it is found in the experimental results that MOBSO-NS algorithm has the maximum NMI value compared with other algorithms, indicating that the community structure divided by the algorithm in this paper is most similar to the real network.Compared with MOLS-NET, MODPSO, MOEA/D-NET, and BGLL, MOBSO-NS algorithm has significant advantages in terms of average and maximum value of community structure, and the similarity between the community detected by it and the actual community division is also closer. The network of Zachary’s karate club and the Bottlenose dolphins, in particular, has a strong community structure. Because theNMI values of the algorithm are uniformly distributed on each network, the algorithm has stronger robustness.


## 4.1. Dataset

Comparing with other related methods, the MBSO-OS algorithm was experimentally analyzed in four real networks including Zachary’s karate club, the Bottlenose dolphins, the American college football, and the books about US Politics by comparing with other related methods.The network of Zachary’s karate club represents a social relationship between 34 members of a university karate club in the United States, where each node represents a member, and the edge between two nodes means that the corresponding two members are friends in frequent contacts. Due to the differences between the club management and the coaches, the club was finally divided into two: the coach-centered team was split from the club, forming a new club, while the manager-centered team remained at the club. The network has a total of 34 nodes and 78 links.The dolphin network is an animal social network constructed by Lusseau by observing 62 dolphins of different genders in New Zealand’s Doubtful Bay. Each node in the network represents a dolphin. If two dolphins are closely connected, there will be an edge connection between the corresponding vertices of the dolphins that are naturally divided into two communities: male and female groups.The network of the American college football has a total of 77 nodes with 121 edges. The nodes in the network represent football teams, and the edge between the nodes indicates that a game has already been played between the two teams.The political books’ network edited by Krebs consists of 105 nodes and 441 edges. The nodes represent books on American politics from Amazon, and the edges between the two nodes indicate that the two books are frequently purchased together. Newman divided the books into different parts in light of the political views of the book, with a few exceptions.Table1 shows the number of nodes and edges of the four real networks.Table 1
Network in the experiment.
NetworksNodesEdgesKarate3478Dolphins62159Football77121Political books105441


## 4.2. Introduction to Evaluation Indexes

Currently, the most widely used community quality evaluation index is theQ value function developed by Newman and Girva [24]. The modularity of Q is defined as follows:(4)Q=∑i=1Keim−di2m2.By studying the related problems of complex network clustering based on optimization methods, the algorithm selects the two most common community quality evaluation indicators (Q, NMI) as the objective function.The standard of modularity is a measure of the degree of goodness of the identified communities in the network. It is considered that the larger theQ value, the stronger the community structure. The modularity is defined as the score of the edges falling into the community minus the expected probability of random allocation of these edges, and the edges are randomly added to the network, independent of the community structure. k is the number of clusters found in the network, ei is the total number of edges connecting nodes in cluster i, di is the sum of nodes in cluster i, and m is the total number of edges in the network. The standard of modularity is generally within the range of [−0.5, 1], whereas most practical networks have a modularity value within the range of [0.3, 0.7], where a value greater than 0.3 indicates an important community structure.Normalized mutual information (NMI) measures the similarity between the actual classification of societies and the detected societies. According to information theory, normalized mutual information NMI (A, B) is defined as follows:(5)NMIA,B=−2∑i=1CA∑j=1CBCijlogCijn/Ci.C.j∑i=1CACi.logCi./n+∑j=1CBC.jlogC.j/n.Set two partitions of the network asA and B, and let C represent the mixed matrix and its element Cij the number of nodes that appear in communities Ai ∈ A, Bj ∈ B.Among them,CA and CB, respectively, signify the number of communities in the partition of A and B, Ci. represents the sum of the elements in matrix C, over row i, C.j indicates the sum of elements in matrix C, over column j, and n is the number of nodes in the network. The value of NMI ranges from 0 and 1. If A and B are completely consistent, the maximum value of NMI is 1, while if A and B are completely inconsistent, for example, the whole network is detected as A community, the minimum value of NMI is 0.


## 4.3. Parameter Setting

In order to verify the detection performance of the algorithm proposed in this paper, python3.7 was used to program the algorithm under the MAC OSX environment. The performance of the algorithm was simulated using real networks, respectively, and the test results were measured with standardized normalized mutual information. The maximum number of iterations of all datasets is set as 160, and the population number of popNum is set as 100 for each dataset. The objective space is divided into elite cluster, novelty cluster, and ordinary cluster. The proportions of new population α generated by mutation of elite cluster, new population β generated by the fusion of elite cluster and ordinary cluster, and new population λ generated by the fusion of elite cluster and novelty cluster are set as 0.5, 0.4, and 0.1, respectively, and the EP (external archive has not been updated) restart parameter Q is 5, and the number of iterations restart parameter P is 20.


## 4.4. Test Results and Analysis

### 4.4.1. MOBSO-NS Test Results

For each network, the algorithm runs 30 times. After each run, the bestQ value and NMI value are selected for segmentation and recording. After 30 runs, the average is taken between the best Q value and NMI each time. The results are shown in Table 2. From the results of Zachary’s karate club network and Bottlenose dolphins’ experiments, it can be seen that the MOBSO-NS NMI value reaches the maximum value of 1, which indicates that the results of the community detected by the algorithm are the same as the real community division. The American College Football also has an NMI value of close to 1. For the Q value, the four network division results are between 0.3 and 0.7.Table 2
MOBSO-NS experimental results.
NetworkKarateDolphinFootballPolitical booksNMImax110.93670.6287NMIavg110.92290.6101Qmax0.41980.52200.60440.5269Qavg0.41980.52200.60230.5269


### 4.4.2. Parameter Analysis

There are three individual generation operations in the algorithm, involving three parametersα, β, and λ, among which, α is the proportion of the offspring generated by the disturbance of the elite individual, β is the proportion of the new population generated by the fusion of the elite cluster and the ordinary cluster, and λ is the proportion of new populations generated by the fusion of elite clusters and novelty clusters. In order to ensure the validity of the experimental results, a higher weight should be assigned to the elite clusters, with ordinary clusters and novel clusters as an aid to maintain the diversity of the population, which means the value of α should be above 0.5. In this paper, the parameter α starts from 0.5 and gradually increases to 0.8 in steps of 0.1, β corresponds to 0.4, 0.2, 0.2, and 0.1, and λ is 0.1, 0.2, 0.1, and 0.1. The rest parameters remain unchanged. The statistics of NMImax, NMIavg, Qmax, and Qavg are performed on the test results as shown in Tables 3–5. Figures 5–8 are the NMIavg line graphs of the values of the three parameters α, β, and λ for four datasets: Zachary’s karate club, the Bottlenose dolphins, the American college football, and the political books.Table 3
The value of parameterα is 0.6, β is 0.2, and λ is 0.2
NetworkKarateDolphinsFootballPolitical booksNMImax110.92690.6310NMIavg110.90580.5985Qmax0.41980.52220.60440.5269Qavg0.41980.51950.59840.5259Table 4
The value of parameterα is 0.7, β is 0.2, and λ is 0.1
NetworkKarateDolphinsFootballPolitical booksNMImax110.92690.6313NMIavg10.99740.91020.6018Qmax0.41980.52380.60440.5269Qavg0.41950.52000.60000.5264Table 5
The value of parameterα is 0.8, β is 0.1, and λ is 0.1
NetworkKarateDolphinsFootballPolitical booksNMImax110.93610.6287NMIavg10.99630.90940.5972Qmax0.41980.52680.60460.5269Qavg0.41980.52110.60010.5260Figure 5
Line chart in karate whenα, β, and λ are given different values.Figure 6
Line chart in dolphins whenα, β, and λ are given different values.Figure 7
Line chart in football whenα, β, and λ are given different values.Figure 8
Line chart in political books whenα, β, and λ are given different values.From the experimental results in Tables3–5, it can be seen that although the values of Qmax and NMImax are higher than those in Table 2 on individual datasets, the maximum Q values and maximum NMI values that appear due to the randomness of the algorithm have no reference value, and their mean values are both less than those in Table 2. Therefore, the experimental results reach the best when α is 0.5, β is 0.4, and λ is 0.1.As can be seen from Figures5–8, among the four sets of different values of α, β, and λ, only when α is 0.5, β is 0.4, and λ is 0.1, NMImax, NMIavg, Qmax, and Qavg performed the best in four evaluation indexes. From the experimental results of the karate network, it can be found from the analysis in Figure 5 that NMI is 1 regardless of the value of α. This is because the size of the karate network is very small, α is the proportion of offspring generated by elite individual disturbance, and the changes of α, β, and λ have no effect on NMI. For the network, only when α is equal to 0.5, the result is the best, while when α is equal to 0.4, the NMI value decreases, and the scale of the network is larger than karate network, as shown in Figure 6. In Figures 7 and 8, a similar line graph appears. When α is 0.6, β is 0.2, and λ is 0.2, the NMI value is the smallest, which is caused by the large number of nodes in football network and political books’ network.Figures9 and 10, respectively, show the real communities detected on Zachary’s karate club network and dolphins social network through MOBSO-NS. The different colors of the nodes indicate different communities obtained by the algorithm.Figure 9
Karate.Figure 10
Dolphins.Figure11 shows the partition structure with the highest NMI value and Q value generated by the political book network through the MOBSO-NS algorithm. It can be seen that, for the partition with the highest NMI, the algorithm generates 3 communities, which are exactly equal to the number of correct communities in the political book network. That is to say, the MOBSO-NS algorithm can find a structure that is closer to the real structure.Figure 11
Political books.Figure12 shows the communities in which the MOBSO-NS algorithm detects the maximum NMI on the American college football network. MOBSO-NS produced 11 communities, but the correct number of communities in the soccer network was 12.Figure 12
Football.


## 4.4.1. MOBSO-NS Test Results

For each network, the algorithm runs 30 times. After each run, the bestQ value and NMI value are selected for segmentation and recording. After 30 runs, the average is taken between the best Q value and NMI each time. The results are shown in Table 2. From the results of Zachary’s karate club network and Bottlenose dolphins’ experiments, it can be seen that the MOBSO-NS NMI value reaches the maximum value of 1, which indicates that the results of the community detected by the algorithm are the same as the real community division. The American College Football also has an NMI value of close to 1. For the Q value, the four network division results are between 0.3 and 0.7.Table 2
MOBSO-NS experimental results.
NetworkKarateDolphinFootballPolitical booksNMImax110.93670.6287NMIavg110.92290.6101Qmax0.41980.52200.60440.5269Qavg0.41980.52200.60230.5269


## 4.4.2. Parameter Analysis

There are three individual generation operations in the algorithm, involving three parametersα, β, and λ, among which, α is the proportion of the offspring generated by the disturbance of the elite individual, β is the proportion of the new population generated by the fusion of the elite cluster and the ordinary cluster, and λ is the proportion of new populations generated by the fusion of elite clusters and novelty clusters. In order to ensure the validity of the experimental results, a higher weight should be assigned to the elite clusters, with ordinary clusters and novel clusters as an aid to maintain the diversity of the population, which means the value of α should be above 0.5. In this paper, the parameter α starts from 0.5 and gradually increases to 0.8 in steps of 0.1, β corresponds to 0.4, 0.2, 0.2, and 0.1, and λ is 0.1, 0.2, 0.1, and 0.1. The rest parameters remain unchanged. The statistics of NMImax, NMIavg, Qmax, and Qavg are performed on the test results as shown in Tables 3–5. Figures 5–8 are the NMIavg line graphs of the values of the three parameters α, β, and λ for four datasets: Zachary’s karate club, the Bottlenose dolphins, the American college football, and the political books.Table 3
The value of parameterα is 0.6, β is 0.2, and λ is 0.2
NetworkKarateDolphinsFootballPolitical booksNMImax110.92690.6310NMIavg110.90580.5985Qmax0.41980.52220.60440.5269Qavg0.41980.51950.59840.5259Table 4
The value of parameterα is 0.7, β is 0.2, and λ is 0.1
NetworkKarateDolphinsFootballPolitical booksNMImax110.92690.6313NMIavg10.99740.91020.6018Qmax0.41980.52380.60440.5269Qavg0.41950.52000.60000.5264Table 5
The value of parameterα is 0.8, β is 0.1, and λ is 0.1
NetworkKarateDolphinsFootballPolitical booksNMImax110.93610.6287NMIavg10.99630.90940.5972Qmax0.41980.52680.60460.5269Qavg0.41980.52110.60010.5260Figure 5
Line chart in karate whenα, β, and λ are given different values.Figure 6
Line chart in dolphins whenα, β, and λ are given different values.Figure 7
Line chart in football whenα, β, and λ are given different values.Figure 8
Line chart in political books whenα, β, and λ are given different values.From the experimental results in Tables3–5, it can be seen that although the values of Qmax and NMImax are higher than those in Table 2 on individual datasets, the maximum Q values and maximum NMI values that appear due to the randomness of the algorithm have no reference value, and their mean values are both less than those in Table 2. Therefore, the experimental results reach the best when α is 0.5, β is 0.4, and λ is 0.1.As can be seen from Figures5–8, among the four sets of different values of α, β, and λ, only when α is 0.5, β is 0.4, and λ is 0.1, NMImax, NMIavg, Qmax, and Qavg performed the best in four evaluation indexes. From the experimental results of the karate network, it can be found from the analysis in Figure 5 that NMI is 1 regardless of the value of α. This is because the size of the karate network is very small, α is the proportion of offspring generated by elite individual disturbance, and the changes of α, β, and λ have no effect on NMI. For the network, only when α is equal to 0.5, the result is the best, while when α is equal to 0.4, the NMI value decreases, and the scale of the network is larger than karate network, as shown in Figure 6. In Figures 7 and 8, a similar line graph appears. When α is 0.6, β is 0.2, and λ is 0.2, the NMI value is the smallest, which is caused by the large number of nodes in football network and political books’ network.Figures9 and 10, respectively, show the real communities detected on Zachary’s karate club network and dolphins social network through MOBSO-NS. The different colors of the nodes indicate different communities obtained by the algorithm.Figure 9
Karate.Figure 10
Dolphins.Figure11 shows the partition structure with the highest NMI value and Q value generated by the political book network through the MOBSO-NS algorithm. It can be seen that, for the partition with the highest NMI, the algorithm generates 3 communities, which are exactly equal to the number of correct communities in the political book network. That is to say, the MOBSO-NS algorithm can find a structure that is closer to the real structure.Figure 11
Political books.Figure12 shows the communities in which the MOBSO-NS algorithm detects the maximum NMI on the American college football network. MOBSO-NS produced 11 communities, but the correct number of communities in the soccer network was 12.Figure 12
Football.


## 4.5. Comparison of Qualities of Online Communities

In order to demonstrate the advantages of MOBSONS algorithm in community detection from various aspects, the experimental data of MOBSONS algorithm, MOLS-Net, MODPSO, MOEA/D-NET, and BGLL algorithm inNMImax, NMIavg, Qmax, and Qavg are compared, as shown in Table 6.Table 6
Comparison of network community quality.
NetworkIndexMOBSO-NSBSO-OSMOLS-NetMODPSOMOEA/D-NetBGLLKarateNMImax111110.7071NMIavg1110.972910.6280Qmax0.41980.41980.41980.41980.37150.4198Qavg0.41980.41980.41980.41380.37150.4118DolphinNMImax111110.6363NMIavg111110.5148Qmax0.52200.52690.52680.52680.37350.5277Qavg0.52200.52690.52370.51960.37350.5210FootballNMImax0.93670.93570.93610.92890.93670.8923NMIavg0.92290.92290.92730.92450.93340.8765Qmax0.60440.60440.60460.60320.60050.6046Qavg0.60230.60320.60440.59950.59930.6038Political booksNMImax0.62870.6254—0.59100.58950.4420NMIavg0.61010.5999—0.59100.58850.4420Qmax0.52690.5259—0.52630.52590.5186Qavg0.52690.5259—0.52630.52590.5186Among them, the multiobjective discrete particle swarm optimization (MODPSO) proposed by Gong et al. [15] designed a swarm optimization method specific to the problem of tag propagation, which adopted neighbor-based turbulence operators to produce different individuals and improve diversity, showing high clustering efficiency. Zhou et al. [20]. proposed the multiobjective local search (MOLS-NET) algorithm to express the community detection problem as a multiobjective optimization problem and then presented a multiobjective optimization algorithm based on local search. Different target local search methods designed can optimize two targets simultaneously. The BGLL algorithm is an aggregation algorithm proposed by Blondel et al. [25] based on the concept of modularity, which can be used to analyze the hierarchical structure of weighted networks. The MOEA/D-NET algorithm was designed by Gong etal. [14] to solve the community detection as a multiobjective optimization problem using the decomposition based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm. The proposed algorithm maximized the density of the interior degree and minimized the density of the exterior degree.Table6 describes the comparison results between MOBSO-NS proposed in this paper and other four algorithms on the four evaluation indexes. The network of karate and dolphins is simple because the real network is divided into two communities. The NMI value given by the algorithm in this paper is the same as that of the compared algorithm, both of which are 1. This results in the community structure of the two networks being divided accurately enough. As for the Q value, the MOBSO-NS is not the best in the network, but the NMI value of 1 indicates that the divided network is exactly the same as the real network, which does not affect the experimental results.For Zachary’s karate club network and the Bottlenose dolphins network, because the real network is relatively simple, two communities are divided. TheNMI value given by the algorithm in the paper is the same as that given by the compared algorithm, both of which are 1, indicating that these two networks have been accurately divided into network community structures. As for the Q value, although the performance of MOBSO-NS is not the best performance in dolphin network, the NMI value of 1 indicates that the partitioned network is completely consistent with the real network, which has no effect on the experimental results.The political books’ network is complex, and most existing methods fail to detect the true division of the network. MOBSO-NS is the result when the actual number of communities is unknown. Compared with those of MOLS-NET algorithm with the known actual number of communities, the experimental results of MOBSO-NS algorithm are more objective and accurate. In addition, it is clear from the contents recorded in Table6 that the experimental results in the political books’ network and the community quality are much higher than those of the other four known algorithms.In the American college football network, the real network has 12 community divisions. For theQ value, MOLS-NET is superior to all comparison algorithms. Due to the complexity of the network, no algorithm can realize the real partition structure. Other algorithms perform better than MOBSO-NS in terms of the average Q because the American college football league network is essentially a network with numerous and difficult community divisions. However, it is found in the experimental results that MOBSO-NS algorithm has the maximum NMI value compared with other algorithms, indicating that the community structure divided by the algorithm in this paper is most similar to the real network.Compared with MOLS-NET, MODPSO, MOEA/D-NET, and BGLL, MOBSO-NS algorithm has significant advantages in terms of average and maximum value of community structure, and the similarity between the community detected by it and the actual community division is also closer. The network of Zachary’s karate club and the Bottlenose dolphins, in particular, has a strong community structure. Because theNMI values of the algorithm are uniformly distributed on each network, the algorithm has stronger robustness.


## 5. Conclusion

The research of complex network community detection is of great significance to Internet culture security and information personalized service. At present, most of the complex network community detection algorithms based on heuristic optimization are the strength of a single community structure quality evaluation, and the diversity of community quality evaluation indexes makes the network community structure analysis more decision-making. In this paper, a novel multiobjective brain storm community detection method (MOBSO-NS) based on novelty search is proposed to solve the problem of complex network community detection. The novelty search method can effectively avoid premature convergence and enhance the global search ability while maintaining the diversity of the population. Secondly, the restart operation is used to help individuals escape from the local optimal point. The idea of novelty search is integrated into the brainstorming optimization algorithm, and the mechanism of generating new individuals is innovated. Experimental results show that the algorithm in this paper has better optimization ability and can obtain better results of network community division.There still remains some work related with MOBSO-NS that deserves to be further investigated. The MOBSO-NS suggested in this paper has shown that utilizing local community information is a promising idea to obtain good community partition in the static networks. In the future, we would like to combine this strategy with other frameworks of MOEA, such as NSGA-II, SPEA2, and IBEA, to further explore the local information in other kinds of complex networks, such as overlapping communities and dynamic networks. In addition, as the real data communities tend to be very large, how to improve the performance of MOBSO-NS by identifying the communities with small sizes is also an interesting work.



---

*Source: 5535881-2021-04-22.xml*