# Construction and Application of MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry for the Detection of Haemophilus parasuis

Authors: Xiaoxu Wang; Feng Xu; Kun Ning; Liping Shen; Xinyong Qi; Jian Wang
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

To construct a protein fingerprint database ofHaemophilus parasuis (H. parasuis), thus improving its clinical diagnosis efficiency. A total of 15 H. parasuis standard strains were collected to establish a protein fingerprint database of H. parasuis using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), and the effects of different culture media and culture time on the quality and identification results of the protein fingerprint were investigated. The results showed that tryptone soy agar (TSA) and tryptone soy broth (TSB) media and different incubation times had no significant effect on the characteristic peaks of the protein profiles. In addition, 18 clinical isolates were used to compare the identification results of the self-built protein fingerprint database, PCR detection, and basic database. Only one strain was identified in the original VITEK-MS system database, while the self-made protein fingerprint database of H. parasuis was 100% accurate for the detection of 18 clinical isolate strains. The protein fingerprint database of H. parasuis built by our laboratory is suitable for rapid clinical diagnosis of H. parasuis, due to its high accuracy, efficiency, and strong specificity.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

With the improvement of the Chinese economy, the pig industry has reached a great development, so how to produce commercial pigs in a healthy and efficient way has become the key.Haemophilus parasuis (H. parasuis) disease, also known as Glässer’s disease [1], is induced by H. parasuis, leading to the increase of body temperature, joint swelling, dyspnea, polyserositis, and arthritis in pigs [2]. It is an infectious disease with a high mortality rate, seriously endangering the health of piglets and young pigs. H. parasuis has brought great economic losses to the pig industry and seriously threatened the healthy development of this industry worldwide. H. parasuis is a Gram-negative, nonmotile, small, pleomorphic bacterium belonging to genus Haemophilus in the family Pasteurellaceae [3]. However, because it is different from other genera in this family, Dickerman et al. [4] suggested renaming H. parasuis to Glasserella parasuis (this article continues to use H. parasuis). The virulence varies considerably between serotypes. Virulent strains can particularly as secondary microorganism of pneumonia cause septicemia without polyserositis or Glässer’s disease characterized by polyserositis, pericarditis, arthritis, and meningitis [5].Currently, detection methods forH. parasuis disease include etiological detection, serological detection [6], molecular biological detection [7], and loop-mediated isothermal amplification [8]. Traditional etiological diagnosis needs pathogen isolation and culture, biochemical identification, serological or molecular biological identification, etc. However, H. parasuis grows slowly on the culture medium with high nutritional requirements [9]. Meanwhile, the clinical pathogen isolation and culture are often easily interfered by other miscellaneous bacteria. In general, etiological detection is difficult and time-consuming in clinical. Serological detection, with complex operation, can only detect whether pigs have been infected with H. parasuis but cannot be used as a basis for diagnosis of the disease. Molecular biological detection requires complicated steps including template extraction, amplification, and sequencing. Therefore, further rapid and accurate diagnosis of H. parasuis disease has become the primary problem.Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is a new soft ionization biomass spectrometry technology developed in recent years. It is a technology that through laser excitation of small molecular proteins or polypeptides contained in microorganisms, peptide mass fingerprints are formed and then compared with the standard fingerprints of known microorganisms in databases so as to rapidly identify microorganisms [10, 11]. MALDI-TOF MS has played a significant role in clinical [12], microbiological laboratory [13]. Compared with traditional serological and molecular biological diagnostic methods, MALDI-TOF MS is simple, rapid, accurate, economical, and with good reproducibility and high-throughput automation [14–16].In this study, 15 serotypes ofH. parasuis standard strains were used to construct a protein fingerprint database of H. parasuis using MALDI-TOF MS, so as to explore the influence of different detection conditions on identification results. In addition, 18 clinical isolates were used to compare the identification results of the self-built protein fingerprint database, PCR detection, biochemical detection, and basic database, in order to explore the application of MALDI-TOF MS technology in rapid diagnosis and identification of H. parasuis in veterinary clinic.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Strains and Sources

Escherichia coli standard strain ATCC 8739 was provided by BioMerieux, Inc. (France). Fifteen serotype standard strains of H. parasuis were purchased from the China Institute of Veterinary Drug Control. Eighteen clinical H. parasuis strains were isolated and preserved by Shanghai Animal Disease Control Center. The names and sources of all strains are shown in Table 1.Table 1
Information of strains.
Standard strain numberStrain nameSupplierClinical strain numberSeparation siteSourceATCC8739E. coliBioMerieuxGONGJIANPEILungOur laboratoryCVCC2661602A. pleuropneumoniaeIVDC0601LungOur laboratoryATCC12948Pasteurella multocidaATCC201705LungOur laboratoryCVCC3891H. parasuis type 1IVDCPmultLungOur laboratoryCVCC3892H. parasuis type 2IVDCC07-020Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3893H. parasuis type 3IVDCC07-019Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3894H. parasuis type 4IVDCC07-016Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3895H. parasuis type 5IVDCC07-015Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3896H. parasuis type 6IVDCC07-014Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3897H. parasuis type 7IVDCC07-013Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3898H. parasuis type 8IVDCC07-012Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3899H. parasuis type 9IVDCC07-011Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3900H. parasuis type 10IVDCC07-010Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3901H. parasuis type 11IVDCC07-009Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3902H. parasuis type 12IVDCC07-008Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3903H. parasuis type 13IVDCC07-007Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3904H. parasuis type 14IVDCC07-006Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3905H. parasuis type 15IVDCC07-005Nasal swabOur laboratoryNotes: all strains were isolated and preserved in our laboratory. Abbreviations: E. coli:Escherichia coli; IVDC: China Institute of Veterinary Drug Control; ATCC: American Type Culture Collection; H. parasuis: Haemophilus parasuis; A. pleuropneumoniae: Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae.


### 2.2. Isolation and Culture of H. parasuis

The strains were dipped with an inoculation loop under aseptic conditions and then were inoculated streaked on a chocolate plate containing 10 mg/mL NAD (Shanghai Regal Biology Technology Co., Ltd., China) and cultured at 37°C for 48 hours. The suspicious colonies were selected for gram staining and inoculated on a tryptone soy agar (TSA, Becton Dickinson and Company, USA) plate containing 5% calf serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and 10 mg/mL NAD for culture.Under aseptic conditions, the bacterial colonies after culture were inoculated and horizontally streaked on a sheep blood plate without NAD. Then, Staphylococcus aureus was selected and inoculated perpendicular to the horizontal lines. After culturing at 37°C for 24 to 48 hours, the growth of bacterial colonies was observed.


### 2.3. Biochemical Index Determination and PCR Identification of Bacteria

The suspicious colonies were selected and inoculated into glucose, lactose, galactose, mannitol, and xylose microbiochemical identification tubes, respectively. Each tube was cultured at 37°C for 24 hours at the final concentration of NAD of 10μg/mL.The primers ofH. parasuis (Table 2) were used for multiplex PCR amplification. The reaction system of H. parasuis was as follows: premix 12.5 μL, DEPC water 8 μL, mixed primer 3 μL, and template 1.5 μL. The reaction conditions were as follows: 95°C for 2 min, 94°C for 30 s, 58°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1.5 min, 29 cycles of amplification; extension at 72°C for 10 min.Table 2
Primers ofHaemophilus parasuis.
SerotypePrimer sequenceSection size (bp)1FCTGTGTATAATCTATCCCCGATCATCAGC180RGTCCAACAGAATTTGGACCAATTCCTG2FCTAACAAGTTAGGTATGGAGGGTTTTGGTG295RGGCACTGAATAAGGGATAATTGTACTG3FCATGGTGTTTATCCTGACTTGGCTGT650RTCCACATGAGGCCGCTTCTAATATACT4FGGTTAAGAGGTAGAGCTAAGAATAGAGG320RCTTTCCACAACAGCTCTAGAAACC5/12FCCACTGGATAGAGAGTGGCAGG450RCCATACATCTGAATTCCTAAGC6FGATTCTGATGATTTTTGGCTGACGGAACG360RCCTATTCTGTCTATAAGCATAGACAGGAC7FCTCCGATTTCATCTTTTCTATGTGG490RCGATAAACCATAACAATTCCTGGCAC8FGGAAGGGGATTACTACTACCTGAAAG650RCTCCATAGAACCTGCTGCTTGAG9FAGCCACATCAATTTTAGCCTCATCA710RCCTTAAATAGCCTATGTCTGTACC10FGGTGACATTTATGGGCGAGTAAGTC790RGCACTGTCATCAATAACAATCTTAAGACG11FCCATCTCTTTAACTAATGGGACTG890RGGACGCCAAGGAGTATTATCAAATG13FGCTGGAGGAGTTGAAAGAGTTGTTAC840RCAATCAAATGAAACAACAGGAAGC14FGCTGGTTATGACTATTTCTTTCGCG730RGCTCCCAAGATTAAACCACAAGCAAG15FCAAGTTCGGATTGGGAGCATATATC550RCCTATATCATTTGTTGGATGTACGA11FACAACCTGCAAGTACTTATCGGGAT275RTAGCCTCCTGTCTGATATTCCCACG


### 2.4. Culture of H. parasuis in Different Culture Media

H. parasuis standard strain CVCC3892 was inoculated into TSA and tryptone soy broth (TSB), respectively, and cultured at 37°C for 48 hours. The bacteria growing in the two media were directly smeared on the target plate, covered with 1 μL α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA, BioMerieux, Inc., France) matrix solution. After completely air-dried, VITEK Mass Spectrometry (VITEK-MS, BioMerieux, France) was used to obtain the MS of the bacteria.


### 2.5. Culture of H. parasuis for Different Culture Time

H. parasuis standard strain CVCC3892 was inoculated into TSA and cultured in an incubator at 37°C for 24 hours or 48 hours. The single colony of the bacteria at the two time points was directly smeared on the target plate, covered with 1 μL CHCA matrix solution. After completely air-dried, the MS of the strains was obtained using VITEK-MS.


### 2.6. Self-Built Protein Fingerprint Database of H. parasuis

Fifteen standard strains ofH. parasuis were inoculated with TSA and cultured at 37°C for 48 hours. A small number of single colonies were dipped with an inoculation loop, evenly smeared on the target plate, then added with 1 μL CHCA matrix solution after making double wells for each strain. The target plate was put into the machine for detection after the matrix solution was completely dried. A protein fingerprint database was constructed in line with the establishment process of VITEK MS RUO [17].


### 2.7. Verification of the Self-Built Protein Fingerprint Database by Clinical Strains

EighteenH. parasuis clinical strains were inoculated into TSA, cultured at 37°C for 48 hours. The standard strain of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (CVCC2661602) and Pasteurella multocida (ATCC12948) was inoculated into Columbia blood plate, cultured at 37°C for 24 hours. A small number of single colonies were taken using inoculation loop, respectively, evenly smeared on the target plate, then added with 1 μL CHCA matrix solution. Finally, the target plate was put into the machine for detection after the matrix solution was completely dried. The operation was performed according to the identification process of VITEK MS RUO.


## 2.1. Strains and Sources

Escherichia coli standard strain ATCC 8739 was provided by BioMerieux, Inc. (France). Fifteen serotype standard strains of H. parasuis were purchased from the China Institute of Veterinary Drug Control. Eighteen clinical H. parasuis strains were isolated and preserved by Shanghai Animal Disease Control Center. The names and sources of all strains are shown in Table 1.Table 1
Information of strains.
Standard strain numberStrain nameSupplierClinical strain numberSeparation siteSourceATCC8739E. coliBioMerieuxGONGJIANPEILungOur laboratoryCVCC2661602A. pleuropneumoniaeIVDC0601LungOur laboratoryATCC12948Pasteurella multocidaATCC201705LungOur laboratoryCVCC3891H. parasuis type 1IVDCPmultLungOur laboratoryCVCC3892H. parasuis type 2IVDCC07-020Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3893H. parasuis type 3IVDCC07-019Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3894H. parasuis type 4IVDCC07-016Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3895H. parasuis type 5IVDCC07-015Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3896H. parasuis type 6IVDCC07-014Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3897H. parasuis type 7IVDCC07-013Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3898H. parasuis type 8IVDCC07-012Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3899H. parasuis type 9IVDCC07-011Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3900H. parasuis type 10IVDCC07-010Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3901H. parasuis type 11IVDCC07-009Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3902H. parasuis type 12IVDCC07-008Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3903H. parasuis type 13IVDCC07-007Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3904H. parasuis type 14IVDCC07-006Nasal swabOur laboratoryCVCC3905H. parasuis type 15IVDCC07-005Nasal swabOur laboratoryNotes: all strains were isolated and preserved in our laboratory. Abbreviations: E. coli:Escherichia coli; IVDC: China Institute of Veterinary Drug Control; ATCC: American Type Culture Collection; H. parasuis: Haemophilus parasuis; A. pleuropneumoniae: Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae.


## 2.2. Isolation and Culture of H. parasuis

The strains were dipped with an inoculation loop under aseptic conditions and then were inoculated streaked on a chocolate plate containing 10 mg/mL NAD (Shanghai Regal Biology Technology Co., Ltd., China) and cultured at 37°C for 48 hours. The suspicious colonies were selected for gram staining and inoculated on a tryptone soy agar (TSA, Becton Dickinson and Company, USA) plate containing 5% calf serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and 10 mg/mL NAD for culture.Under aseptic conditions, the bacterial colonies after culture were inoculated and horizontally streaked on a sheep blood plate without NAD. Then, Staphylococcus aureus was selected and inoculated perpendicular to the horizontal lines. After culturing at 37°C for 24 to 48 hours, the growth of bacterial colonies was observed.


## 2.3. Biochemical Index Determination and PCR Identification of Bacteria

The suspicious colonies were selected and inoculated into glucose, lactose, galactose, mannitol, and xylose microbiochemical identification tubes, respectively. Each tube was cultured at 37°C for 24 hours at the final concentration of NAD of 10μg/mL.The primers ofH. parasuis (Table 2) were used for multiplex PCR amplification. The reaction system of H. parasuis was as follows: premix 12.5 μL, DEPC water 8 μL, mixed primer 3 μL, and template 1.5 μL. The reaction conditions were as follows: 95°C for 2 min, 94°C for 30 s, 58°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1.5 min, 29 cycles of amplification; extension at 72°C for 10 min.Table 2
Primers ofHaemophilus parasuis.
SerotypePrimer sequenceSection size (bp)1FCTGTGTATAATCTATCCCCGATCATCAGC180RGTCCAACAGAATTTGGACCAATTCCTG2FCTAACAAGTTAGGTATGGAGGGTTTTGGTG295RGGCACTGAATAAGGGATAATTGTACTG3FCATGGTGTTTATCCTGACTTGGCTGT650RTCCACATGAGGCCGCTTCTAATATACT4FGGTTAAGAGGTAGAGCTAAGAATAGAGG320RCTTTCCACAACAGCTCTAGAAACC5/12FCCACTGGATAGAGAGTGGCAGG450RCCATACATCTGAATTCCTAAGC6FGATTCTGATGATTTTTGGCTGACGGAACG360RCCTATTCTGTCTATAAGCATAGACAGGAC7FCTCCGATTTCATCTTTTCTATGTGG490RCGATAAACCATAACAATTCCTGGCAC8FGGAAGGGGATTACTACTACCTGAAAG650RCTCCATAGAACCTGCTGCTTGAG9FAGCCACATCAATTTTAGCCTCATCA710RCCTTAAATAGCCTATGTCTGTACC10FGGTGACATTTATGGGCGAGTAAGTC790RGCACTGTCATCAATAACAATCTTAAGACG11FCCATCTCTTTAACTAATGGGACTG890RGGACGCCAAGGAGTATTATCAAATG13FGCTGGAGGAGTTGAAAGAGTTGTTAC840RCAATCAAATGAAACAACAGGAAGC14FGCTGGTTATGACTATTTCTTTCGCG730RGCTCCCAAGATTAAACCACAAGCAAG15FCAAGTTCGGATTGGGAGCATATATC550RCCTATATCATTTGTTGGATGTACGA11FACAACCTGCAAGTACTTATCGGGAT275RTAGCCTCCTGTCTGATATTCCCACG


## 2.4. Culture of H. parasuis in Different Culture Media

H. parasuis standard strain CVCC3892 was inoculated into TSA and tryptone soy broth (TSB), respectively, and cultured at 37°C for 48 hours. The bacteria growing in the two media were directly smeared on the target plate, covered with 1 μL α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA, BioMerieux, Inc., France) matrix solution. After completely air-dried, VITEK Mass Spectrometry (VITEK-MS, BioMerieux, France) was used to obtain the MS of the bacteria.


## 2.5. Culture of H. parasuis for Different Culture Time

H. parasuis standard strain CVCC3892 was inoculated into TSA and cultured in an incubator at 37°C for 24 hours or 48 hours. The single colony of the bacteria at the two time points was directly smeared on the target plate, covered with 1 μL CHCA matrix solution. After completely air-dried, the MS of the strains was obtained using VITEK-MS.


## 2.6. Self-Built Protein Fingerprint Database of H. parasuis

Fifteen standard strains ofH. parasuis were inoculated with TSA and cultured at 37°C for 48 hours. A small number of single colonies were dipped with an inoculation loop, evenly smeared on the target plate, then added with 1 μL CHCA matrix solution after making double wells for each strain. The target plate was put into the machine for detection after the matrix solution was completely dried. A protein fingerprint database was constructed in line with the establishment process of VITEK MS RUO [17].


## 2.7. Verification of the Self-Built Protein Fingerprint Database by Clinical Strains

EighteenH. parasuis clinical strains were inoculated into TSA, cultured at 37°C for 48 hours. The standard strain of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (CVCC2661602) and Pasteurella multocida (ATCC12948) was inoculated into Columbia blood plate, cultured at 37°C for 24 hours. A small number of single colonies were taken using inoculation loop, respectively, evenly smeared on the target plate, then added with 1 μL CHCA matrix solution. Finally, the target plate was put into the machine for detection after the matrix solution was completely dried. The operation was performed according to the identification process of VITEK MS RUO.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Effect of Different Media on Protein Mass Spectra

The mass spectra ofH. parasuis standard strain CVCC3892 inoculated in TSA and TSB media were compared. The result showed no significant difference in the characteristic peaks between the two (Figure 1), indicating that the culture medium had no significant effect on the characteristic peaks of the protein mass spectra.Figure 1
Comparison of protein mass spectra ofHaemophilus parasuis in different media.


### 3.2. Effect of Different Culture Time on Protein Mass Spectra

The mass spectra ofH. parasuis standard strain CVCC3892 inoculated in TSA for 24 h and 48 h were compared. The result showed no significant difference in the characteristic peaks between the two (Figure 2).Figure 2
Comparison of protein mass spectra ofHaemophilus parasuis for different culture time.


### 3.3. Construction of Protein Fingerprint Database of 15 Standard Strains

According to the establishment process of VITEK MS RUO [17], protein mass spectra of 15 standard strains of H. parasuis were obtained. Forty characteristic protein peaks were ultimately retained, with at least 80% strains of each mass peak possessed 40 characteristic peaks (Figures 3(a)–3(c)). The weight of peaks was determined in accordance with the number of matches (horizontal rows) and the number of reserved characteristic peaks (vertical rows). In this study, the matching number of non-database-building bacteria was 18, and the characteristic peak was 40, so the weight of each peak was 33. Subsequently, all the number codes in super spectrum were changed to 33 in order to complete the establishment and activation of the self-built database.Figure 3
Characteristic peaks of protein mass spectrum ofHaemophilus parasuis standard strains. (a) Flow chart of the establishment of protein mass spectrum database; (b) screening methods of 40 characteristic protein peaks; (c) mass spectrum of 40 characteristic peaks.
(a)(b)(c)


### 3.4. Comparison of Identification Results between the Clinical Strain System Database and the Self-Built Database

The VITEK-MS original system database was used to identify 18 clinicalH. parasuis isolates stored in the laboratory. The results showed that only one strain could be identified to genus Pasteurella, and the other strains could not be identified (Table 3).Table 3
Comparison of identification results between clinical strain system database and self-built database.
Strain numberStrain nameSourceVITEK-MS original identification resultSelf-built protein mass spectrumIdentification resultAccuracyATCC8739E. coliMerieuxE. coli/78.9%CVCC2661602A. pleuropneumoniaeIVDCA. pleuropneumoniae/99.9%ATCC12948Pasteurella multocidaATCCPasteurella/95.0%GONGJIANPEIH. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/Lignieresii/peuropneumoniae87.4%0601H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/Bordetella bronchiseptica/parapertussis99.9%201705H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/Pasteurella multocida99.0%PmultH. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/Pasteurella multocida89.1%C07-020H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/Pasteurella multocida99.9%C07-019H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.9%C07-016H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.9%C07-015H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.9%C07-014H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.9%C07-013H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.9%C07-012H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.9%C07-011H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.9%C07-010H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.9%C07-009H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.9%C07-008H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.9%C07-007H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.0%C07-006H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.9%C07-005H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.9%Notes: “/”: means no detection; “-”: means undetected. Abbreviations: IVDC: China Institute of Veterinary Drug Control; ATCC: American Type Culture Collection; E. coli:Escherichia coli; H. parasuis: Haemophilus parasuis; A. pleuropneumoniae: Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae.Eighteen clinical strains isolated and identified in our laboratory were used to verify the mass spectral database ofH. parasuis. Besides, Pasteurella multocida and Bordetella were applied for the verification of specificity of the mass spectral database (Table 3). The results showed that all the clinical strains could be detected, and the coincidence rate with the super mass spectrum was between 89.1% and 99.9%. All of Pasteurella multocida, Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, and Bordetella did not match with the new protein fingerprint database of H. parasuis, indicating that this new database was of strong heterogeneousness.


### 3.5. Comparison of Identification Efficiency between Clinical Strain System Database and Traditional Identification Methods

Eighteen clinical isolates ofH. parasuis were all identified using the self-built protein mass spectra database, with identification accuracy of 100%. A total of 16 isolates were identified using the traditional PCR method, with an identification efficiency of 88.9%. Meanwhile, after isolation and culture of the strains, the efficiency of microscopic examination was 94.4% (Table 4).Table 4
Comparison of clinical strain identification efficiency.
BacteriaNumber of strain identified by self-built database (n)Number of strain identified by PCR (n)Number of strain identified by microscopic examination (n)H. parasuis181617Efficiency100%88.9%94.4%


## 3.1. Effect of Different Media on Protein Mass Spectra

The mass spectra ofH. parasuis standard strain CVCC3892 inoculated in TSA and TSB media were compared. The result showed no significant difference in the characteristic peaks between the two (Figure 1), indicating that the culture medium had no significant effect on the characteristic peaks of the protein mass spectra.Figure 1
Comparison of protein mass spectra ofHaemophilus parasuis in different media.


## 3.2. Effect of Different Culture Time on Protein Mass Spectra

The mass spectra ofH. parasuis standard strain CVCC3892 inoculated in TSA for 24 h and 48 h were compared. The result showed no significant difference in the characteristic peaks between the two (Figure 2).Figure 2
Comparison of protein mass spectra ofHaemophilus parasuis for different culture time.


## 3.3. Construction of Protein Fingerprint Database of 15 Standard Strains

According to the establishment process of VITEK MS RUO [17], protein mass spectra of 15 standard strains of H. parasuis were obtained. Forty characteristic protein peaks were ultimately retained, with at least 80% strains of each mass peak possessed 40 characteristic peaks (Figures 3(a)–3(c)). The weight of peaks was determined in accordance with the number of matches (horizontal rows) and the number of reserved characteristic peaks (vertical rows). In this study, the matching number of non-database-building bacteria was 18, and the characteristic peak was 40, so the weight of each peak was 33. Subsequently, all the number codes in super spectrum were changed to 33 in order to complete the establishment and activation of the self-built database.Figure 3
Characteristic peaks of protein mass spectrum ofHaemophilus parasuis standard strains. (a) Flow chart of the establishment of protein mass spectrum database; (b) screening methods of 40 characteristic protein peaks; (c) mass spectrum of 40 characteristic peaks.
(a)(b)(c)


## 3.4. Comparison of Identification Results between the Clinical Strain System Database and the Self-Built Database

The VITEK-MS original system database was used to identify 18 clinicalH. parasuis isolates stored in the laboratory. The results showed that only one strain could be identified to genus Pasteurella, and the other strains could not be identified (Table 3).Table 3
Comparison of identification results between clinical strain system database and self-built database.
Strain numberStrain nameSourceVITEK-MS original identification resultSelf-built protein mass spectrumIdentification resultAccuracyATCC8739E. coliMerieuxE. coli/78.9%CVCC2661602A. pleuropneumoniaeIVDCA. pleuropneumoniae/99.9%ATCC12948Pasteurella multocidaATCCPasteurella/95.0%GONGJIANPEIH. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/Lignieresii/peuropneumoniae87.4%0601H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/Bordetella bronchiseptica/parapertussis99.9%201705H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/Pasteurella multocida99.0%PmultH. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/Pasteurella multocida89.1%C07-020H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/Pasteurella multocida99.9%C07-019H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.9%C07-016H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.9%C07-015H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.9%C07-014H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.9%C07-013H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.9%C07-012H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.9%C07-011H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.9%C07-010H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.9%C07-009H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.9%C07-008H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.9%C07-007H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.0%C07-006H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.9%C07-005H. parasuisIsolated in laboratory/H. parasuis99.9%Notes: “/”: means no detection; “-”: means undetected. Abbreviations: IVDC: China Institute of Veterinary Drug Control; ATCC: American Type Culture Collection; E. coli:Escherichia coli; H. parasuis: Haemophilus parasuis; A. pleuropneumoniae: Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae.Eighteen clinical strains isolated and identified in our laboratory were used to verify the mass spectral database ofH. parasuis. Besides, Pasteurella multocida and Bordetella were applied for the verification of specificity of the mass spectral database (Table 3). The results showed that all the clinical strains could be detected, and the coincidence rate with the super mass spectrum was between 89.1% and 99.9%. All of Pasteurella multocida, Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, and Bordetella did not match with the new protein fingerprint database of H. parasuis, indicating that this new database was of strong heterogeneousness.


## 3.5. Comparison of Identification Efficiency between Clinical Strain System Database and Traditional Identification Methods

Eighteen clinical isolates ofH. parasuis were all identified using the self-built protein mass spectra database, with identification accuracy of 100%. A total of 16 isolates were identified using the traditional PCR method, with an identification efficiency of 88.9%. Meanwhile, after isolation and culture of the strains, the efficiency of microscopic examination was 94.4% (Table 4).Table 4
Comparison of clinical strain identification efficiency.
BacteriaNumber of strain identified by self-built database (n)Number of strain identified by PCR (n)Number of strain identified by microscopic examination (n)H. parasuis181617Efficiency100%88.9%94.4%


## 4. Discussion

H. parasuis is an important pathogen posing severe infections in pigs. H. parasuis disease is concentrated in piglets in the nursing stage and is easily secondary to immune suppression diseases (such as porcine blue ear disease or porcine circovirus disease) in pigs [18, 19]. This disease causes huge economic losses to the pig industry worldwide. Therefore, a rapid and accurate identification method is of great significance for the prevention and treatment of H. Parasuis disease.Previous studies have revealed that MALDI-TOF MS technology is applied to the identification offoodborne yeasts and yeast-like fungi [20], filamentous fungi [21], mycobacteria [22], Nocardia [23], and Porphyromonas [24]. Kuhnert et al. [25] used MALDI-TOF MS to identify Pasteurellaceae species and subspecies from 250 species in an efficient and simple way. Moreno et al.’s research [26] also used MALDI-TOF MS to identify animal H. parasuis. In addition, Yu et al. [27] identified 16 different proteins from H. parasuis by using MALDI-TOF MS. In our study, 15 serotypes H. parasuis standard strains were used to construct the protein fingerprint database of H. parasuis by MALDI-TOF MS, and the effects of different culture media and time on the identification results were studied. Meanwhile, 18 clinical isolates were used to compare the identification results of self-built database, PCR detection, and basic database. The results indicated that this protein fingerprint database of H. parasuis using the MALDI-TOF MS method was very stable, and culture media and time had no significant effect on it. Its accuracy and stability were similar to the traditional molecular biological detection method, but with faster detection speed.In the process of the MALDI-TOF MS for detection ofH. parasuis, TSA and TSB media were selected for the optimization of culture conditions, and H. parasuis was cultured for 24 h and 48 h, respectively. The results confirmed that both have no significant effect on the results of protein spectrum identification, indicating that H. parasuis requires a wide range of growth conditions. However, from the mass spectrum, there are slight differences in the intensity of characteristic peaks and the number and intensity of other small peaks in the mass spectrum of H. parasuis under different growth conditions. Studies have demonstrated that the mass spectrum after MALDI-TOF MS detection of vibrio cultured in different media is inconsistent [28], which was consistent with our results. This indicates that the growth condition of H. parasuis was less demanding and its growth state was consistent at different time points.In the validation of MALDI-TOF MS detection forH. parasuis, before using the new protein fingerprint database, VITEK-MS was used to identify H. parasuis isolated strains after PCR. And the result showed that only one strain could be identified to genus Pasteurella, and the other strains could not be identified. Therefore, the new-built protein fingerprint database is necessary for routine testing, which can immensely improve the identification efficacy of H. parasuis.In summary, compared with the traditional detection methods, the protein fingerprint database constructed by MALDI-TOF MS in this experiment for the detection ofH. parasuis is easier to operate, economical, rapid, and more accurate. Therefore, it can be used as an effective tool for the detection of H. parasuis.



---

*Source: 5588855-2021-04-15.xml*