# Autoimmune Regulator Gene Polymorphisms in Egyptian Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients: Preliminary Results

Authors: Doaa HS Attia; Dalia AH Dorgham; Ahmed A. El Maghraby; Marwa Alkaffas; Mahitab A. Abdel Kawy; Mai M. Sherif; Radwa M. Abdel Halim
Journal: International Journal of Rheumatology
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

Background. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease. The autoimmune regulator (AIRE) is a master regulator of self-tolerance development. AIRE mutations lead to the development of autoimmune polyglandular syndrome type 1 while AIRE polymorphisms have been linked to organ-specific autoimmunity. The study is aimed at addressing the association between AIRE polymorphisms, rs2075876 (G > A) and rs760426 (A > G), and SLE susceptibility and expression in Egyptian patients. Methods. Ninety-nine patients were included. One hundred and ten, and 123 control subjects were genotyped for rs2075876 and rs760426, respectively. Lupus severity was assessed using the Lupus Severity of Disease Index and Lupus Severity Index (LSI). Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) damage index was considered. Genotyping was done using StepOne Real-Time PCR. Results. AIRE rs760426 GG was more frequent in the patients under the genotype level (14.1% vs. 4.9%, p=0.032) and recessive model (14.1% vs. 4.9%, p=0.017, OR=3.2 (1.2-8.7)). Musculoskeletal involvement and nephritis were associated with AIRE rs2075876 under the dominant (97.9% vs. 80.8%, p=0.009, OR=11 (1.3-89.2)) and recessive models (100% vs. 69.3%, p=0.032), respectively; and both were linked to AIRE rs2075876 at the allelic level: 98.3% vs. 85%, p=0.005, OR=10.1 (1.3-76.6) and 82.8% vs. 68.6, p=0.041, OR=2.2 (1-4.7), respectively. Patients with AIRE rs2075876 A alleles had a higher damage index ( 1 ± 1.3 vs. 0.6 ± 1.1, p=0.045) while the LSI was greater in patients with AIRE rs2075876 (8.5 ± 0.5 vs. 7.8 ± 1.3, p=0.002) and rs760426 (8.6 ± 11 vs. 7.8 ± 1.2, p=0.031) under the recessive models. Conclusion. AIRE rs760426 could share in SLE susceptibility while AIRE rs2075876 could influence the disease expression and burden in Egyptian patients.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a prototypic systemic autoimmune disease that is characterized by loss of self-tolerance with subsequent activation of the autoreactive T and B cells, production of autoantibodies, and eventual inflammation-induced tissue injury and organ dysfunction [1]. Being a common disease in the Arabs with a special predilection to the young productive population, it represents a great burden on the individual and national levels [2, 3].Understanding the detailed pathogenesis of the disease helps the development of targeted therapies that are aimed at attacking the critical steps of disease pathogenesis, hence, aborting the disease process using more effective and less toxic medications [4]. It is hypothesized that SLE develops secondary to the effect of environmental factors on a genetically predisposed person. Several human leucocytic antigen (HLA) and non-HLA genes have been suggested as risk factors for SLE [5].The autoimmune regulator (AIRE) is a transcriptional factor that controls the expression of peripheral autoantigens in the thymus enhancing the negative selection of the autoreactive T lymphocytes during the process of thymic education [6, 7]. Mutations of the AIRE gene lead to the development of autoimmune polyglandular syndrome type 1 (APS1) or autoimmune polyendocrinopathy candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy syndrome: a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by the development of Addison’s disease, hypoparathyroidism, and chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis [8, 9].Additional evidence of the utmost importance ofAIRE in self-tolerance development is the link between AIRE gene polymorphisms and several autoimmune disorders [10] including vitiligo [11], type 1 diabetes [12], Hashimoto’s thyroiditis [13], Graves’ disease [14], autoimmune hepatitis [15], myasthenia gravis [16], and alopecia areata [17]. Moreover, AIRE-deficient mice could express a wide spectrum of autoimmune phenomena depending on the genetic background of the strain [18].Being a prototypic systemic autoimmune disease, our study is aimed at addressing the frequency ofAIRE single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs2075876 (G>A) and rs760426 (A>G) in SLE patients compared with the controls, and their relation to the phenotypic disease expression in an Egyptian cohort. AIRE rs2075876 and rs760426 were particularly selected for the study as systematic reviews and meta-analyses showed their significant association with RA [19–24]: another systemic immune complex-mediated autoimmune disease showing common genetic risk factors with SLE [25]. We hypothesized that AIRE SNPs could be implicated in systemic autoimmunity [18] as AIRE dysfunction could influence organs of different natures and functions, i.e., the skin, endocrine glands, and liver [10–17]. To the best of knowledge, few studies involving AIRE polymorphisms in lupus patients were found to date in the literature [26, 27].


## 2. Materials and Methods

Patients enrolled in this case-control study were recruited from the Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Department, Kasr AL-Ainy Hospital, Cairo University, Egypt. The control subjects had no family history of autoimmune diseases. Patients were classified/reclassified according to the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification criteria for SLE [28].Demographic, clinical, and investigational data were collected from patients’ charts using a standardized form. Disease onset was defined as the time point of the development of the first disease manifestation. Disease duration was defined as the duration between the disease onset and the time of enrolment. Lupus severity was assessed using Lupus Severity of Disease Index (Lupus SDI) [29] and Lupus Severity Index (LSI) [30]. SLICC/ACR damage index [31] was considered as well.All data were studied under the genetic models, and the genotype and allelic distributions. The genetic models were determined based on the studied SNP.The study conformed to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki. The local ethics committee approval was obtained (N9-2018). All participants gave informed consent.No study had addressedAIRE SNPs in SLE patients when this study was designed. Hence, sample size calculation was not possible and a pilot study involving ten patients and ten controls was commenced. The frequency of AIRE rs760426 under the dominant model was 30% in patients and 0% in controls. Using these results with an alpha error of 0.05 and a power of 95%, a minimum sample size of 33 patients and 33 controls was required.


### 2.1. DNA Extraction and Genotyping

According to the manufacturer’s recommendations, genomic DNA was isolated from the whole blood using a QIAamp DNA blood mini kit (Qiagen, Germany) and stored at -20°C.Genotyping of the rs2075876 and rs760426 of theAIRE gene was done across all participants’ sample sets using the TaqMan Allelic Discrimination Assay Kit (probe ID C__15863141_20 and C__5886344_10, respectively, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and these SNPs were analyzed on StepOne Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction System (Applied biosystems CA94404, Foster City, USA).


### 2.2. Statistical Methods

The Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) online calculator was used for the calculation of the allelic frequencies [32]. Haplotype frequency was calculated using the SNPStats online calculator [33]. The data were tabulated and statistically analyzed. Results were described in terms of mean ± standard deviation (± SD) or median and interquartile range (IQR) for quantitative data, and numbers and percentages for qualitative data. Statistical differences between groups were tested using the Chi-square tests for qualitative variables; Bonferroni adjustment was applied for multiple comparisons setting a new p value of 0.017 for 3 comparisons (between AA and AG, AA and GG, and AG and GG for each of rs2075876 and rs760426 SNPs). For the quantitative data, the unpaired sample t-test was used for the comparison between two groups. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for comparing numerical data between multiple groups while the Kruskal-Wallis test was used instead when the homogeneity of variance assumption was violated. Genotype frequencies were compared between the disease and control groups using logistic regression; odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals was calculated. A two-tailed probability value (p value) less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant unless specified. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) 20.0 statistical package.


## 2.1. DNA Extraction and Genotyping

According to the manufacturer’s recommendations, genomic DNA was isolated from the whole blood using a QIAamp DNA blood mini kit (Qiagen, Germany) and stored at -20°C.Genotyping of the rs2075876 and rs760426 of theAIRE gene was done across all participants’ sample sets using the TaqMan Allelic Discrimination Assay Kit (probe ID C__15863141_20 and C__5886344_10, respectively, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and these SNPs were analyzed on StepOne Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction System (Applied biosystems CA94404, Foster City, USA).


## 2.2. Statistical Methods

The Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) online calculator was used for the calculation of the allelic frequencies [32]. Haplotype frequency was calculated using the SNPStats online calculator [33]. The data were tabulated and statistically analyzed. Results were described in terms of mean ± standard deviation (± SD) or median and interquartile range (IQR) for quantitative data, and numbers and percentages for qualitative data. Statistical differences between groups were tested using the Chi-square tests for qualitative variables; Bonferroni adjustment was applied for multiple comparisons setting a new p value of 0.017 for 3 comparisons (between AA and AG, AA and GG, and AG and GG for each of rs2075876 and rs760426 SNPs). For the quantitative data, the unpaired sample t-test was used for the comparison between two groups. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for comparing numerical data between multiple groups while the Kruskal-Wallis test was used instead when the homogeneity of variance assumption was violated. Genotype frequencies were compared between the disease and control groups using logistic regression; odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals was calculated. A two-tailed probability value (p value) less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant unless specified. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) 20.0 statistical package.


## 3. Results

The study included 99 SLE patients, 92 female and 7 male patients. Their mean age of disease onset was 23.32 ± 8.62 years, the mean age at recruitment was 30.91 ± 8.55 years, and the median disease duration was 7 years (IQR: 3-13 years). One hundred and ten, and 123 control subjects were genotyped for rs2075876 and rs760426, respectively, with a total of 109 (88.6%) females and 14 (11.4%) males and a mean age of 31.79 ± 5.34 years. Both the patient and control groups were matched for age, sex, and ethnicity.The frequencies of the clinical disease manifestations and the associated comorbidities among the study cohort are illustrated in Figures1 and 2, respectively. The most common clinical features were musculoskeletal (88.9%) and mucocutaneous (80.8%). Regarding major organ involvement, lupus nephritis and neuropsychiatric manifestations developed in 72.7% and 13.1% of patients, respectively. The most common associated comorbidities in the study cohort were systemic hypertension (35.4%) and antiphospholipid syndrome (21.2%); other comorbidities represented minorities.Figure 1
The frequency of the different disease phenotypes in the lupus cohort. MSK: musculoskeletal; MC: mucocutaneous; LN: lupus nephritis; NPS: neuropsychiatric.Figure 2
The frequency of comorbidities among the lupus cohort. HTN: systemic hypertension; APS: antiphospholipid syndrome; DM: diabetes mellitus; RHD: rheumatic heart disease; OP: osteoporosis; HCV: hepatitis C virus; IHD: ischemic heart disease.∗The Sydney classification criteria were used [41]. †Diagnosis of osteoporosis was based on a patient’s low bone mineral density in comparison to that of a healthy adult of matched age and sex plus the presence of an osteoporotic fracture(s) [42].The genotype, genetic models, and allele frequencies ofAIRE rs2075876 in the patients and control groups are shown in Table 1. The A allele of AIRE rs2075876 was more frequently found in the patients group compared with the control group (29.3% vs. 20.9%, p = 0.048, OR = 1.6 (95% CI: 1-2.4)).Table 1
Genotype and allele frequency ofAIRE rs2075876 in the lupus patients and control groups.
Patients (n=99)Control (n=110)p valueOR (95% CI)GenotypeAA,n (%)11 (11.1)8 (7.3)0.159AG,n (%)36 (36.4)30 (27.3)GG,n (%)52 (52.5)72 (65.5)ModelsDominantAA+AG,n (%)47 (47.5)38 (34.5)0.0571.7 (1-3)GG,n (%)52 (52.5)72 (65.5)RecessiveAA,n (%)11 (11.1)8 (7.3)0.3351.6 (0.6-4.1)GG+AG,n (%)88 (88.9)102 (92.7)Patients (2n=198)Control (2n=220)AlleleA,n (%)58 (29.3)46 (20.9)0.0481.6 (1-2.4)G,n (%)140 (70.7)174 (79.1)The comparisons were done using the Chi-square tests.n: number; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.The genotype and allele frequencies ofAIRE rs760426 in the patients and control groups are shown in Table 2. Under the genotype distribution, the homozygous SNP was more common in the patients group compared with the control group (14.1% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.032), and this significant difference was persistent after Bonferroni correction. Logistic regression using the AA genotype as the reference group revealed that the GG genotype was statistically more common in the patients group compared with the control group (p=0.037, OR: 2.934 (95% CI: 1.069-8.053)). Moreover, AIRE rs760426 was more prevalent in the patients group under the recessive model (p = 0.017, OR: 3.2 (95% CI: 1.2-8.7)).Table 2
Genotype and allele frequency ofAIRE rs760426 in the lupus patients and control groups.
Patients (n=99)Control (n=123)p valueOR (95% CI)GenotypesGG,n (%)14 (14.1)6 (4.9)0.032∗AG,n (%)19 (19.2)34 (27.6)AA,n (%)66 (66.7)83 (67.5)ModelsDominantGG+AG,n (%)33 (33.3)40 (32.5)0.8981 (0.6-1.8)AA,n (%)66 (66.7)83 (67.5)RecessiveGG,n (%)14 (14.1)6 (4.9)0.0173.2 (1.2-8.7)AA+AG,n (%)85 (85.9)117 (95.1)Patients (2n=198)Control (2n=246)AllelesG,n (%)47 (23.7)46 (18.7)0.1951.4 (0.9-2.1)A,n (%)151 (76.3)200 (81.3)The comparisons were done using the Chi-square tests.∗After Bonferroni correction and logistic regression, the GG genotype was significantly more frequent in the patients group than the control group. n: number, OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval.The distribution of the genotypes in the control subjects was in accordance with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium for both polymorphisms: the Chi-square values are <3.2 for both SNPs with ap value > 0.05.Regarding frequencies ofAIRE gene (rs2075876 and rs760426) haplotypes in the study group and the association with SLE, the A allele (in rs2075876 SNP) and the G allele (in rs760426 SNP) were coexistent in 54% of SLE patients in contrast to 46% of controls with a significant difference (p value = 0.014; OR=10.95 (1.65-72.62)). Linkage disequilibrium analysis revealed that there is no linkage between the two studied AIRE gene SNPs (rs2075876 and rs760426) (Supplementary table 1).The association betweenAIRE rs2075876 and rs760426 and the different disease parameters in the patients group are shown in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. The wild genotype of AIRE rs2075876 was more frequently observed in patients without musculoskeletal involvement, and this significance was persistent after Bonferroni correction (19.2%, 2.8%, and 0% for the GG, AG, and AA genotypes, respectively). After logistic regression, 80.7% of patients with the GG genotype had musculoskeletal involvement compared with 97.2% of patients with the AG genotype (p = 0.022, OR: 0.12 (0.015-0.984)). Under the dominant model, AIRE rs2075876 AA+AG was more frequent in patients with musculoskeletal involvement (97.9% for AA+AG versus 80.8% for GG) with a p value of 0.009, OR = 11 (95% CI: 1.3-89.2).Table 3
The association betweenAIRE rs2075876 and the clinical parameters in the lupus patients.
GenotypesModelsAllelesDominantRecessiveAA(n=11)AG(n=36)GG(n=52)p valueAA+AG(n=47)GG(n=52)p valueOR (95% CI)AA(n=11)GG+AG(n=88)p valueOR (95% CI)A2n=58G2n=140p valveOR (95% CI)Constitutional,n (%)8 (72.7)25 (69.4)28 (53.8)0.24233 (70.2)28 (53.8)0.0942.0 (0.9-4.6)8 (72.7)53 (60.2)0.5231.8 (0.4-7.1)41 (70.7)81 (57.9)0.0911.8 (1-3.4)MC,n (%)8 (72.7)32 (88.9)40 (76.9)0.28940 (85.1)40 (76.9)0.3021.7 (0.6-4.8)8 (72.7)72 (81.8)0.4370.6 (0.1-2.5)48 (82.8)112 (80)0.6541.2 (0.5-2.7)MSK,n (%)11 (100)35 (97.2)42 (80.8)0.025a46 (97.9)42 (80.8)0.00911 (1.3-89.2)11 (100)77 (87.5)0.60657 (98.3)119 (85)0.00510.1 (1.3-76.6)Serositis,n (%)3 (27.3)20 (55.6)26 (50)0.25823 (48.9)26 (50)0.9161 (0.4-2.1)3 (27.3)46 (52.3)0.2000.3 (0.1-1.4)26 (44.8)72 (51.4)0.3980.8 (0.4-1.4)Nephritis,n (%)11 (100)26 (72.2)35 (67.3)0.08637 (78.7)35 (67.3)0.2031.8 (0.7-4.5)11 (100)61 (69.3)0.03248 (82.8)96 (68.6)0.0412.2 (1-4.7)Hematological,n (%)6 (54.5)17 (47.2)32 (61.5)0.41323 (48.9)32 (61.5)0.2080.6 (0.3-1.3)6 (54.5)49 (55.7)0.9431 (0.3-3.4)29 (50)81 (57.9)0.3110.7 (0.4-1.3)NPS,n (%)2 (18.2)5 (13.9)6 (11.5)0.8277 (14.9)6 (11.5)0.6221.3 (0.4-4.3)2 (18.2)11 (12.5)0.6351.6 (0.3-8.2)9 (15.5)17 (12.1)0.5221.3 (0.6-3.2)Cardiac,n (%)1 (9.1)1 (2.8)0 (0)0.1382 (4.3)0 (0)0.2231 (9.1)1 (1.1)0.2118.7 (0.5-150.1)3 (5.2)1 (0.7)0.0767.6 (0.8-74.5)Pulmonary,n (%)1 (9.1)0 (0)1 (1.9)0.1721 (2.1)1 (1.9)>0.9991.1 (0.07-18.2)1 (9.1)1 (1.1)0.2118.7 (0.5-150.1)2 (3.4)2 (1.4)0.5822.5 (0.3-17.9)Vasculitis,n (%)2 (18.2)6 (16.7)11 (21.2)0.8678 (17)11 (21.2)0.6020.8 (0.3-2.1)2 (18.2)17 (19.3)>0.9991 (0.2-4.7)10 (17.2)28 (20)0.6540.8 (0.4-1.9)SDI (mean±SD)5.6±1.85.3±2.24.92±1.90.5015.4±2.14.9±1.90.2555.6±1.85.1±20.4805.4±25±20.217LSI (mean±SD)8.5±0.57.8±1.27.8±1.30.179b8±1.17.8±1.30.5738.5±0.57.8±1.30.0028.1±17.8±1.30.155SLICC damage index (mean±SD)1.2±1.50.9±1.30.5±10.1701±1.30.5±10.0881.2±1.50.7±1.10.1691±1.30.6±1.10.045Comparisons were done using the Chi-square tests for the categorical data while the unpaired samplet-test and the one-way ANOVA test were used to compare the quantitative data between two and multiple groups, respectively, unless specified. aThe significant difference was persistent after Bonferroni correction and logistic regression. bKruskal-Wallis test was used. n: number. MC: mucocutaneous; MSK: musculoskeletal; NPS: neuropsychiatric; SDI: Lupus Severity of Disease Index; LSI: Lupus Severity Index; SLICC: Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.Table 4
The association between AIRE rs760426 and the clinical parameters in the lupus patients.
GenotypesModelsAllelesDominantRecessiveGG(n=14)AG(n=19)AA(n=66)p valueGG+AG(n=33)AA(n=66)p valueOR (95% CI)GG(n=14)AA+AG(n=85)p valueOR (95% CI)G2n=47A2n=151p valueOR (95% CI)Constitutional,n (%)12 (85.7)12 (63.2)37 (56.1)0.11524 (72.7)37 (56.1)0.1082.1 (0.8-5.2)12 (85.7)49 (57.6)0.0734.4 (0.9-20.9)34 (72.3)88 (58.3)0.0831.9 (1-3.8)MC,n (%)11 (78.6)18 (94.7)51 (77.3)0.22829 (87.9)51 (77.3)0.2822.1 (0.6-7)11 (78.6)69 (81.2)0.7290.9 (0.2-3.4)41 (87.2)119 (78.8)0.2001.8 (0.7-4.7)MSK,n (%)12 (85.7)19 (100)57 (86.4)0.22931 (93.9)57 (86.4)0.3272.4 (0.5-12)12 (85.7)76 (89.4)0.6520.7 (0.1-3.7)43 (91.5)133 (88.1)0.6061.5 (0.5-4.5)Serositis,n (%)9 (64.3)10 (52.6)30 (45.5)0.42119 (57.6)30 (45.5)0.2551.6 (0.7-3.8)9 (64.3)40 (47.1)0.2322 (0.6-6.5)27 (57.4)71 (47.0)0.2121.5 (0.8-3)Nephritis,n (%)11 (78.6)14 (73.7)47 (71.2)0.84925 (57.8)47 (71.2)0.6321.3 (0.5-3.3)11 (78.6)61 (71.8)0.7521.4 (0.4-5.6)35 (74.5)109 (72.2)0.7591.1 (0.5-2.4)Hematological,n (%)7 (50)10 (52.6)38 (57.6)0.84017 (51.5)38 (57.6)0.5670.8 (0.3-1.8)7 (50)48 (56.5)0.6520.8 (0.2-2.4)23 (48.9)87 (57.6)0.2960.7 (0.4-1.4)NPS,n (%)3 (21.4)2 (10.5)8 (12.1)0.6015 (15.2)8 (12.1)0.6741.3 (0.4-4.3)3 (21.4)10 (11.8)0.3882 (0.5-8.6)9 (19.1)17 (11.3)0.1621.9 (0.8-4.5)Cardiac,n (%)0 (0)1 (5.3)1 (1.5)0.5011 (3)1 (1.5)>0.9992 (0.1-33.5)0 (0)2 (2.4)>0.9990 (0)4 (2.6)0.574Pulmonary,n (%)0 (0)1 (5.3)1 (1.5)0.5011 (3)1 (1.5)>0.9992 (0.1-33.5)0 (0)2 (2.4)>0.9992 (4.3)2 (1.3)0.2393.3 (0.5-24.2)Vasculitis,n (%)1 (7.1)4 (21.1)14 (21.2)0.4665 (15.2)14 (21.2)0.4700.7 (0.2-2)1 (7.1)18 (21.2)0.2940.3 (0-2.3)5 (10.6)33 (21.9)0.0880.4 (0.2-1.2)SDI (mean±SD)5.5±1.95.2±25.1±20.7365.3±25.1±20.5025.5±1.95.1±20.4725.5±25±20.199LSI (mean±SD)8.6±1.17.8±1.17.8±1.20.0988.1±1.27.8±1.20.2218.6±1.17.8±1.20.0318.2±1.17.8±1.20.038SLICC damage index (mean±SD)0.6±0.91±1.20.7±1.20.6160.8±1.10.7±1.20.7150.6±0.90.8±1.20.5900.8±1.10.7±1.20.582Comparisons were done using the Chi-square tests for the categorical data while the unpaired samplet-test and the one-way ANOVA test were used to compare the quantitative data between two and multiple groups, respectively. n: number. MC: mucocutaneous; MSK: musculoskeletal; NPS: neuropsychiatric; SDI: Lupus Severity of Disease Index; LSI: Lupus Severity Index; SLICC: Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.In addition,AIRE rs2075876 AA was more common in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) under the recessive model (100% for AA versus 69.3% for AG+GG) with a p value of 0.032. Both, musculoskeletal involvement and LN, were more common in patients with the A alleles compared with patients with the G alleles: 98.3% versus 85% for musculoskeletal affection and 82.8% versus 68.6% for nephritis with p values of 0.005 and 0.041, and OR (95% CI) of 10.1 (1.3-76.6) and 2.2 (1-4.7), respectively.The SLICC/ACR damage index was significantly higher in patients with the A alleles of theAIRE rs2075876 (1 ± 1.3) compared with patients with the G alleles (0.6 ± 1.1), with a p value of 0.045; notably, patients within the A and G groups had comparable disease durations (8.2±9.3 years versus 9.5 ± 8.1 years, respectively, p = 0.344). Moreover, the disease severity, as assessed by the LSI, was significantly higher in patients with AIRE rs2075876 and rs760426 variant allele homozygosity under the recessive models (8.5 ± 0.5 vs. 7.8 ± 1.3, p = 0.002 and 8.6 ± 11 vs. 7.8 ± 1.2, p = 0.031, respectively).As a family history of SLE was reported in only 4 cases belonging to 4 different families, a statistical analysis of this finding was not feasible.


## 4. Discussion

AlthoughAIRE polymorphisms are associated with the development of organ-specific autoimmunity [11–17], the study of this topic in systemic autoimmune diseases seems to be interesting. Several studies addressed AIRE gene polymorphisms in RA patients [19–22], and one study tackled it in patients with progressive systemic sclerosis (PSS) [34]. To the best of our knowledge, only two studies recently addressed AIRE SNPs in SLE patients [26, 27].Our study is aimed at addressing the association betweenAIRE SNPs, rs2075876 (G>A) and rs760426 (A>G), and SLE: a prototypic systemic autoimmune disease.Regarding the association with the disease susceptibility,AIRE rs760426 was particularly associated with disease occurrence. Moreover, the homozygous SNP of AIRE rs760426 was more common in the patients group compared with the control group (14.1% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.032) under the genotype distribution and this significant difference was persistent after Bonferroni correction. Logistic regression using the AA genotype as the reference group revealed that the GG genotype was statistically more common in the patients group compared with the control group (p = 0.037, OR: 2.934 (95% CI: 1.069-8.053)). Moreover, AIRE rs760426 was more prevalent in the patients group under the recessive model (p = 0.017, OR: 3.2 (95% CI: 1.2-8.7)).Concerning the relation to organ system involvement,AIRE rs2075876 was the main SNP of the two related to the disease expression. The wild genotype of AIRE rs2075876 was more frequently observed in patients without musculoskeletal involvement, and this significance was persistent after Bonferroni correction (19.2%, 2.8%, and 0% for the GG, AG, and AA genotypes, respectively). After logistic regression, 80.7% of patients with the GG genotype had musculoskeletal involvement compared with 97.2% of patients with the AG genotype (p = 0.022, OR: 0.12 (0.015-0.984)). Under the dominant model, AIRE rs2075876 AA+AG was more frequent in patients with musculoskeletal involvement (97.9% for AA+AG versus 80.8% for GG) with a p value of 0.009, OR = 11 (95% CI: 1.3-89.2).In addition,AIRE rs2075876 AA was more common in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) under the recessive model (100% for AA versus 69.3% for AG+GG) with a p value of 0.032. Both, musculoskeletal involvement and LN, were more common in patients with the A alleles compared with those with the G alleles: 98.3% versus 85% for musculoskeletal affection and 82.8% versus 68.6% for nephritis, with p values of 0.005 and 0.041, respectively. These observations could suggest the involvement of AIRE rs2075876 in disease phenotypic expression.In relation to the burden of the disease, the SLICC/ACR damage index was significantly higher in patients with the A alleles of theAIRE rs2075876 (1±1.3) compared with the G alleles (0.6 ± 1.1), with a p value of 0.045; notably, the A and G alleles patients groups had comparable disease durations (8.2 ± 9.3 years versus 9.5 ± 8.1 years, p = 0.344). Moreover, the disease severity, as assessed by the LSI, was significantly higher in patients with AIRE rs2075876 and rs760426 variant allele homozygosity under the recessive models.In a study ofAIRE rs2075876 G>A and AIRE rs878081 C>T in Mexican SLE patients, there was no association between AIRE rs2075876 and SLE disagreeing with our findings. On the other side, AIRE rs878081, a SNP that was not tackled in this study, was identified as a susceptibility variant for SLE. In discordance with the study results, neither AIRE rs2075876 nor AIRE rs878081 was associated with the occurrence of LN [26]. The controversy between the results of this Mexican study and ours could be explained by differences concerning genetics and environmental exposures in addition to the polygenic nature of the disease, i.e., the predisposition to and severity of SLE could be influenced by different genes in different populations.Contrary to the Mexican study, a recent study involving Egyptian patients reported thatAIRE rs2075876 variant seems protective against SLE development under the allelic and dominant models while patients with the AIRE rs2075876 AA genotype had statistically significant lower levels of C3 [27].Polymorphisms of theAIRE gene were studied as risk variants for RA in several studies. In a genome-wide association (GWA) study involving Japanese patients with RA, AIRE rs2075876 and rs760426 showed significant associations with the disease [29]. In another study of Chinese RA patients, significant associations with RA were observed for AIRE rs2075876 under the genotypic and allelic distributions and under the recessive model. While there was a tendency of a higher frequency of the G alleles of AIRE rs760426 in the patients compared with the controls, there was a significant association between AIRE rs760426 and the disease under the recessive model [20].In a third study of 9 SNPs of theAIRE gene in Han Chinese RA population including AIRE rs2075876, rs2075877, rs933150, rs1003854, rs2256817, rs3746964, rs878081, rs760426, and rs1078480, the study revealed an increased prevalence of the minor allele A of AIRE rs2075876 in the patients compared with the control group. Moreover, there was a significant association between AIRE rs2075876 and RA under the codominant and dominant models. On the other hand, AIRE rs933150 and rs760426 showed a borderline association with RA [21].Another study of five SNPs of theAIRE gene was carried out in European RA patients. While there was no significant association between AIRE rs2776377, rs2075876, rs1055311, and rs1800520 SNPs and RA, the C variant of rs878081 was identified as a risk variant. Moreover, RA patients showed a higher frequency of AIRE rs878081 variant allele homozygosity. An interesting finding of this study is the association between AIRE rs878081, a synonymous allele, and a lower expression rate of the AIRE gene, as detected by the in silico analysis [24]. The authors explained this finding by the lower affinity of nuclear factor kappa B, an important transcriptional factor for the AIRE gene expression, to this variant allele [35, 36].In a systematic review and meta-analysis study including case-control studies of theAIRE gene SNPs rs2075876 (G>A) and rs760426 (A>G) in RA patients, both SNPs were identified as risk variants for RA under all the genetic models. As most of the involved studies were derived from the Far Eastern populations, the authors could not extrapolate these results to the Caucasians [24]. Another meta-analysis of the AIRE rs2075876 revealed that this SNP increased the risk of RA under all genetic models. In the subgroup analysis of this study, AIRE rs2075876 increased RA susceptibility among Asians but not among Caucasians [25].Concerning PSS, anotherAIRE SNP, G11107A, was linked to the occurrence of autoimmune thyroiditis in PSS patients [34].The discrepancies between Asians and Caucasians in the aforementioned studies were suggested to be attributed to the racial difference of the minor allele frequencies [37], the ethnicity-specific effect of the SNPs, the different environmental exposures, the multifactorial etiology of the disease, the clinical disease heterogeneity, and the small sample size of some studies [25].Despite the fact that rs2075876 (G>A) and rs760426 (A>G) are located in the intronic region, polymorphisms ofAIRE gene noncoding regions have been reported to impair the thymic negative selection, hence, increasing the susceptibility to autoimmune diseases [38]. These observations could be explained by the intron-mediated decrement of the gene expression [39, 40].Although SLE is a polygenic disease that is influenced by several environmental factors [5], this study seems to add to the genetic background of the disease. The study limitations include the lack of evaluation of associations between the studied polymorphisms and the level of expression of AIRE. Being a study with some marginally significant p values and some wide confidence intervals, further studies, including AIRE gene sequencing and expression, on different ethnicities and including a larger sample size are recommended to clarify the association between AIRE polymorphisms, and disease susceptibility, phenotypic expression, and severity. Studying AIRE rs2075876 (G>A) and rs760426 (A>G) could pave the way to genome-wide association studies as the next step to discover other AIRE gene key polymorphisms associated with SLE.


## 5. Conclusion

The susceptibility to SLE in Egyptian patients could be linked toAIRE rs760426 (A>G) while the phenotypic expression and burden of the disease could be related to AIRE rs2075876 (G>A).



---

*Source: 5546639-2021-09-28.xml*