# Analysis of Interwell Connectivity of Tracer Monitoring in Carbonate Fracture-Vuggy Reservoir: Taking T-Well Group of Tahe Oilfield as an Example

Authors: Shuyao Sheng; Yonggang Duan; Mingqiang Wei; Tao Yue; Zijian Wu; Linjiang Tan
Journal: Geofluids
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

Carbonate fracture-vuggy reservoirs are one of the hot spots in oil and gas exploration and development. However, it is extremely difficult to describe the internal spatial structure of the fracture-vuggy unit and understand the interwell connection relationship. As a method to measure reservoir characteristics and feedback reservoir production information directly according to the detected concentration curve, interwell tracer technology provides a direct measure for people to understand the law of oil-water movement and reservoir heterogeneity and is widely used in various domestic oil fields. Based on the flow law of tracer and the CFD flow simulation basic model, this paper establishes the physical conceptual model and studies the influence of three physical parameters (the flow velocity of the fluid passing through the connected channel, diameter of the connected channel, and length of the connected channel) on the concentration curve at the outlet. In addition, the influence of different interwell connection modes on tracer concentration was studied and classified scientifically. According to the simulation, the tracer concentration curve can be classified into three types: unimodal curve, bimodal curve, and multimodal curve. Finally, the injection-production well group in the T-well area of the Tahe Oilfield is taken as an example, the connection mode between injection and production wells in this well area is further discussed and has been verified, which can be used as a reference for the connectivity analysis of similar carbonate reservoirs.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Carbonate reservoirs are one of the most important areas of oil and gas exploration and development in the world [1, 2]. Its reserves account for 52% of the world’s proven reserves, and the extracted oil production accounts for 60% of the world. Among them, the development reserves of carbonate fractured-vuggy low-permeability reservoirs in western China account for as high as 70%, which is the main force for increasing oil reserves and production. Therefore, studying the development of this type of reservoirs has become a top priority, especially the study of their connectivity [3]. Accurate interpretation of the reservoir connectivity pattern from injector to producer is critical to the success of the improved oil recovery (IOR). However, due to the geological heterogeneity and structural complexity of carbonate fractured-vuggy low-permeability reservoirs, accurate interwell evaluation may be very challenging [4].There are many methods to analyze the connectivity between injectors and producers. In the early days, a large number of traditional methods emerged, such as the geochemical method [5, 6], interference well test analysis method [7–9], interwell data analysis method [10–12], and interwell data modeling method [13–22]. Although these methods are practical and convenient, the implementation process will affect the normal production of the oil field, and the low accuracy of the analysis results greatly compromises the availability of these methods. As the research progresses, numerical simulation methods specifically aimed at analyzing the interwell connectivity were being widely used. Zhang et al. [23] used reservoir numerical simulation technology to estimate the connectivity between oil wells and water injection wells in low-permeability microfracture reservoirs. This method can accurately estimate the location and velocity of the waterflood front, the permeability of fractures, the seepage flow situation of reservoir, the production performance of the reservoir, and main and secondary flow channels, etc. Zhao et al. [24] proposed the Interwell Numerical Simulation Model (INSIM), which has less computational effort than before and could be used as a calculation tool to obtain the reservoir performance under waterflooding conditions. The reservoir numerical simulation method can quantitatively evaluate the connectivity and its dynamic changes, but it is time-consuming and complex to build the model, although there are other types of methods to analyze interwell connectivity, such as 4D-seismic data method [25], bottom-hole-temperature data method [26], and neural network(NN) method [27]. Due to the high cost of seismic surveys, high requirements for temperature monitors, and tedious calculation steps of a neural network, these methods cannot perfectly solve the problems of the oil field. For these reasons, the tracer method has become a better choice.Tracer technology was applied in hydrology to monitor groundwater movement in the early 1900s. The application of the tracer technology in the petroleum industry did not begin until nearly half a century later [28]. In oilfields, the information obtained by tracer technology is reliable, unambiguous, and definitive, and thus, it helps to reduce uncertainty about flow paths, reservoir continuity, and reservoir directional characteristics. This method only needs less equipment and instruments to get the test results, which greatly reduces the cost and has high accuracy. Nowadays, tracer technology has developed more maturely. There have been many cases of interwell tracer monitoring used in oil fields [29–33]. The research of tracer monitoring used in fractured carbonate reservoirs generally prefers chemicals [34] or combines dynamic surveillance data with new analytical tools [35, 36]. However, the study of tracer interwell monitoring also has certain limitations. The quantitative response of interwell tracer tests was discussed by Hagoort in 1982 [37]. The discussion included the calculation of the response to the injection of a tracer pulse, the influence of tracer mixing, and the numerical simulation of field tracer tests. Although quantitative analysis was proposed earlier, it has been seldom used. Most tracer tests have been used in a rather qualitative manner.In this paper, a further discussion is carried out on the tracer concentration diffusion formula, and the software simulation method is used to analyze the tracer concentration curve affected by different formula parameters and different model shapes. To improve the reliability of the results, this paper is based on the test data of an oilfield. The Ordovician oil reservoir of Tahe Oilfield is the largest carbonate fractured-vuggy reservoir ever found in China [38]. However, there are relatively few studies on connectivity in this oilfield block, and interwell connectivity is also discussed in traditional ways [39, 40]. Therefore, the characteristics of tracer concentration curves of monitoring wells are studied and scientifically classified by taking the injection-production well group in the carbonate fracture-type T-well area of Tahe Oilfield as an example. The connection mode between injection and production wells in the T-well area is discussed, which can be used for the reference for the connectivity analysis of carbonate fracture-vuggy reservoirs of the same type.


## 2. Methodology

### 2.1. Physical Model

The Ordovician of the Tarim Basin in the Tahe Oilfield is a typical carbonate fractured-vuggy reservoir. We have collected the FMI (formation microscanner image) logging curve (see Figure1(a)) of this characteristic reservoir. It can be seen from the curve that the large dark patches are connected with the long dark shadows. These features indicate the existence of large karst-type caves or fracture-cavity aggregates in the reservoir. In addition, the thin slice image of the cave and the carved image of the carbonate fracture-vuggy reservoir body can also verify the above conclusions (see Figures 1(b) and 1(c)). In summary, these characteristics all show that the large caves in the reservoir are connected by percolation channels with high permeability. Therefore, this paper will use the above conclusions as a basis for the establishment of the model.Figure 1
Proof of connecting channel in the carbonate fractured-vuggy reservoir. (a) FMI logging curve; (b) well test curve; (c) carving of carbonate fracture-vuggy reservoir body.
(a)(b)(c)The initial model is established as shown in Figure2. The connected channel in Figure 2 simulates the interwell connected channel between the injection well and the production well in the carbonate fractured-vuggy low-permeability reservoirs. The parameter values of the model are shown in Table 1.Figure 2
Schematic of the initial model: (a) 2D; (b) 3D.
(a)(b)Table 1
The parameter values of the model.
SymbolParametersValueL1Inlet length (mm)15L2Outlet length (mm)15L3Connected channel length (mm)90H1Inlet height (mm)60H2Outlet height (mm)60W1Inlet width (mm)20W2Outlet width (mm)20DConnected channel diameter (mm)10


### 2.2. Methodology for the Flow Law of Tracer

The principle of tracer monitoring is to track synchronously by simultaneously injecting the water and tracer. After the tracer is injected with water, its flow is mainly affected by convection and diffusion. Convection is based on Darcy’s law, and the fluid reaches the flow state through the pressure gradient generated between injection-production wells. The diffusion is composed of the molecular diffusion caused by the difference of fluid concentration and the mechanical dispersion caused by the heterogeneity of porous media. Because of the influence of dispersion, the tracer is no longer limited to convection caused by pressure difference but extends to the water channeling layer, and the concentration display will also show peak characteristics. Tracer monitoring in oil fields obtains such concentration curves with peak shape characteristics and analyzes and uses them. Therefore, it is urgent to explore methods to study the peak pattern of tracer concentration.During the detection process, the hydrodynamic dispersion equation when the tracer is injected instantaneously is as follows [41]:
(1)∂c∂t=D∂2c∂l2−u∂c∂l.The boundary condition of Equation (1) is
(2)cl,0=0,l≥0,c0,t=c0,t≥0,liml⟶∞cl,t=0,t>0.Thus, Equation (1) can be solved and simplified as
(3)cl,t=c02erfcl−ut4Dt,wherec is the tracer concentration and c0 is the initial concentration of the tracer, t is the tracer migration time, D is the diffusion coefficient, l is the tracer migration distance, and u is the flow velocity.However, the length of the tracer slug in the flow tube is far less than the length of the flow tube. Therefore, Equation (3) can be rewritten as
(4)cl,t=Lc04πDtexp−l−ut24Dt.The injected tracer slug size,L, is defined as
(5)L=4Vπd2.The concentration equation of the tracer at any position in the flow tube is(6)cl,t=2Vc0πd2πDtexp−l−ut24Dt,whereV is the volume of the injected tracer slug and d is the diameter of the migration channel.According to Equation (6), the concentration change curve of the tracer dispersion theoretically (in a stable flow) should show a normal distribution, which is a bisymmetrical unimodal curve. However, in the actual situation, the production concentration of tracer is affected by various parameters such as channel length and liquid flow velocity. Therefore, to explore these laws clearly separately, the CFD simulation tool is used here to carry out actual flow simulation research.


### 2.3. Methodology for CFD Flow Simulation Basic Model

To visually explore the migration law of the tracer fluid in different seepage channels, the CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) method should be used for research [42]. Its core principle is to numerically solve the differential equations that control the fluid flow; the discrete distribution of the flow field in a continuous area can be obtained to approximate the fluid flow. The law of physical conservation (law of conservation of mass, law of conservation of momentum, and law of conservation of energy) is the essence of the CFD method. The three law equations are shown in Equations ((7)–(9)):
(7)∂ρ∂t+∂ρux∂x+∂ρuy∂y+∂ρuz∂z=0,whereρ is the fluid density, t is time, and ux\uy\uz is the velocity component on the x\y\z axes, respectively.
(8)∂ρux∂t+∇⋅ρuxu=−∂p∂x+∂τxx∂x+∂τyx∂y+∂τzx∂z+ρfx,∂ρuy∂t+∇⋅ρuyu=−∂p∂y+∂τxy∂x+∂τyy∂y+∂τzy∂z+ρfy,∂ρuz∂t+∇⋅ρuzu=−∂p∂z+∂τxz∂x+∂τyz∂y+∂τzz∂z+ρfz,wherep is the pressure on the fluid microelement body; τxx, τxy, and τxz are the components of the viscous stress tensor on the surface of the fluid microelement body; and fx, fy, and fz are the components of the mass force on the x, y, and z axes of the fluid per unit mass, respectively.
(9)∂ρT∂t+∂ρuxT∂x+∂ρuyT∂y+∂ρuzT∂z=∂∂xαcp∂T∂x+∂∂yαcp∂T∂y+∂∂zαcp∂T∂z+ST,whereT is the temperature, cp is the specific heat capacity, α is the fluid heat transfer coefficient, and ST is the viscous dissipation term.On the premise of observing the law of conservation, the turbulence model selected for the tracer fluid simulation in this paper is the standardk-ε model, which is an empirical model based on the turbulence energy equation and the diffusion rate equation:
(10)ρdkdt=∂∂xiμ+μtσk∂k∂xi+Gk+Gb−ρε−YM,(11)ρdεdt=∂∂xiμ+μtσε∂ε∂xi+C1εεkGk+C3εGb−C2ερε2k,(12)μt=ρCμk2ε,wherek is the turbulent kinetic energy; ε is the turbulent dissipation rate; μt is the turbulent viscosity coefficient; Gk is the turbulent kinetic energy caused by the average velocity gradient; Gb is the turbulent kinetic energy caused by buoyancy; YM is the influence of compressible turbulent pulsating expansion on total dissipation rate; Cμ is a constant, 0.09; σk is a constant, 1.0; σε is a constant, 1.3; C1ε is a constant, 1.44; C2ε is a constant, 1.92; and C3ε is a constant, 0.09.The essence of the method of solving the above partial differential equation is to be able to use the iterative method to solve the discretized algebraic equation cyclically to obtain the convergent solution of the equations. In 1972, Patankar and Spalding [43] proposed a semi-implicit method for solving pressure coupling equations, namely, the SIMPLE algorithm. This method can correct the pressure field on the basis of the discrete grid, calculate the velocity field to check whether it converges, and finally obtain a convergent solution through repeated corrections and inspections.In this paper, the FEM software is selected as the CFD simulation tool for actual flow simulation research. A conceptual model with connected channels between injection-production wells was established. The inlet (on the side of the injection-production well) was set as a constant injection velocity and injected a mixture of ordinary liquid and special tracer liquid. The outlet (on the side of the production well) is the location where the liquid flows out. By setting the monitoring surface at the outlet, the variation of the concentration of the surface with the time step can be obtained. According to Equation (6), by changing some of the parameters in the equation or changing the shape of the physical model, different kinds of the concentration curves of the tracer can be drawn and then classified and discussed.


## 2.1. Physical Model

The Ordovician of the Tarim Basin in the Tahe Oilfield is a typical carbonate fractured-vuggy reservoir. We have collected the FMI (formation microscanner image) logging curve (see Figure1(a)) of this characteristic reservoir. It can be seen from the curve that the large dark patches are connected with the long dark shadows. These features indicate the existence of large karst-type caves or fracture-cavity aggregates in the reservoir. In addition, the thin slice image of the cave and the carved image of the carbonate fracture-vuggy reservoir body can also verify the above conclusions (see Figures 1(b) and 1(c)). In summary, these characteristics all show that the large caves in the reservoir are connected by percolation channels with high permeability. Therefore, this paper will use the above conclusions as a basis for the establishment of the model.Figure 1
Proof of connecting channel in the carbonate fractured-vuggy reservoir. (a) FMI logging curve; (b) well test curve; (c) carving of carbonate fracture-vuggy reservoir body.
(a)(b)(c)The initial model is established as shown in Figure2. The connected channel in Figure 2 simulates the interwell connected channel between the injection well and the production well in the carbonate fractured-vuggy low-permeability reservoirs. The parameter values of the model are shown in Table 1.Figure 2
Schematic of the initial model: (a) 2D; (b) 3D.
(a)(b)Table 1
The parameter values of the model.
SymbolParametersValueL1Inlet length (mm)15L2Outlet length (mm)15L3Connected channel length (mm)90H1Inlet height (mm)60H2Outlet height (mm)60W1Inlet width (mm)20W2Outlet width (mm)20DConnected channel diameter (mm)10


## 2.2. Methodology for the Flow Law of Tracer

The principle of tracer monitoring is to track synchronously by simultaneously injecting the water and tracer. After the tracer is injected with water, its flow is mainly affected by convection and diffusion. Convection is based on Darcy’s law, and the fluid reaches the flow state through the pressure gradient generated between injection-production wells. The diffusion is composed of the molecular diffusion caused by the difference of fluid concentration and the mechanical dispersion caused by the heterogeneity of porous media. Because of the influence of dispersion, the tracer is no longer limited to convection caused by pressure difference but extends to the water channeling layer, and the concentration display will also show peak characteristics. Tracer monitoring in oil fields obtains such concentration curves with peak shape characteristics and analyzes and uses them. Therefore, it is urgent to explore methods to study the peak pattern of tracer concentration.During the detection process, the hydrodynamic dispersion equation when the tracer is injected instantaneously is as follows [41]:
(1)∂c∂t=D∂2c∂l2−u∂c∂l.The boundary condition of Equation (1) is
(2)cl,0=0,l≥0,c0,t=c0,t≥0,liml⟶∞cl,t=0,t>0.Thus, Equation (1) can be solved and simplified as
(3)cl,t=c02erfcl−ut4Dt,wherec is the tracer concentration and c0 is the initial concentration of the tracer, t is the tracer migration time, D is the diffusion coefficient, l is the tracer migration distance, and u is the flow velocity.However, the length of the tracer slug in the flow tube is far less than the length of the flow tube. Therefore, Equation (3) can be rewritten as
(4)cl,t=Lc04πDtexp−l−ut24Dt.The injected tracer slug size,L, is defined as
(5)L=4Vπd2.The concentration equation of the tracer at any position in the flow tube is(6)cl,t=2Vc0πd2πDtexp−l−ut24Dt,whereV is the volume of the injected tracer slug and d is the diameter of the migration channel.According to Equation (6), the concentration change curve of the tracer dispersion theoretically (in a stable flow) should show a normal distribution, which is a bisymmetrical unimodal curve. However, in the actual situation, the production concentration of tracer is affected by various parameters such as channel length and liquid flow velocity. Therefore, to explore these laws clearly separately, the CFD simulation tool is used here to carry out actual flow simulation research.


## 2.3. Methodology for CFD Flow Simulation Basic Model

To visually explore the migration law of the tracer fluid in different seepage channels, the CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) method should be used for research [42]. Its core principle is to numerically solve the differential equations that control the fluid flow; the discrete distribution of the flow field in a continuous area can be obtained to approximate the fluid flow. The law of physical conservation (law of conservation of mass, law of conservation of momentum, and law of conservation of energy) is the essence of the CFD method. The three law equations are shown in Equations ((7)–(9)):
(7)∂ρ∂t+∂ρux∂x+∂ρuy∂y+∂ρuz∂z=0,whereρ is the fluid density, t is time, and ux\uy\uz is the velocity component on the x\y\z axes, respectively.
(8)∂ρux∂t+∇⋅ρuxu=−∂p∂x+∂τxx∂x+∂τyx∂y+∂τzx∂z+ρfx,∂ρuy∂t+∇⋅ρuyu=−∂p∂y+∂τxy∂x+∂τyy∂y+∂τzy∂z+ρfy,∂ρuz∂t+∇⋅ρuzu=−∂p∂z+∂τxz∂x+∂τyz∂y+∂τzz∂z+ρfz,wherep is the pressure on the fluid microelement body; τxx, τxy, and τxz are the components of the viscous stress tensor on the surface of the fluid microelement body; and fx, fy, and fz are the components of the mass force on the x, y, and z axes of the fluid per unit mass, respectively.
(9)∂ρT∂t+∂ρuxT∂x+∂ρuyT∂y+∂ρuzT∂z=∂∂xαcp∂T∂x+∂∂yαcp∂T∂y+∂∂zαcp∂T∂z+ST,whereT is the temperature, cp is the specific heat capacity, α is the fluid heat transfer coefficient, and ST is the viscous dissipation term.On the premise of observing the law of conservation, the turbulence model selected for the tracer fluid simulation in this paper is the standardk-ε model, which is an empirical model based on the turbulence energy equation and the diffusion rate equation:
(10)ρdkdt=∂∂xiμ+μtσk∂k∂xi+Gk+Gb−ρε−YM,(11)ρdεdt=∂∂xiμ+μtσε∂ε∂xi+C1εεkGk+C3εGb−C2ερε2k,(12)μt=ρCμk2ε,wherek is the turbulent kinetic energy; ε is the turbulent dissipation rate; μt is the turbulent viscosity coefficient; Gk is the turbulent kinetic energy caused by the average velocity gradient; Gb is the turbulent kinetic energy caused by buoyancy; YM is the influence of compressible turbulent pulsating expansion on total dissipation rate; Cμ is a constant, 0.09; σk is a constant, 1.0; σε is a constant, 1.3; C1ε is a constant, 1.44; C2ε is a constant, 1.92; and C3ε is a constant, 0.09.The essence of the method of solving the above partial differential equation is to be able to use the iterative method to solve the discretized algebraic equation cyclically to obtain the convergent solution of the equations. In 1972, Patankar and Spalding [43] proposed a semi-implicit method for solving pressure coupling equations, namely, the SIMPLE algorithm. This method can correct the pressure field on the basis of the discrete grid, calculate the velocity field to check whether it converges, and finally obtain a convergent solution through repeated corrections and inspections.In this paper, the FEM software is selected as the CFD simulation tool for actual flow simulation research. A conceptual model with connected channels between injection-production wells was established. The inlet (on the side of the injection-production well) was set as a constant injection velocity and injected a mixture of ordinary liquid and special tracer liquid. The outlet (on the side of the production well) is the location where the liquid flows out. By setting the monitoring surface at the outlet, the variation of the concentration of the surface with the time step can be obtained. According to Equation (6), by changing some of the parameters in the equation or changing the shape of the physical model, different kinds of the concentration curves of the tracer can be drawn and then classified and discussed.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Influence of Model Parameters on Tracer Concentration Curve

This section is based on the physical model established in Section2.1. The inlet is set to flow into the tracer mixture and the outlet to flow out. The simulation streamline diagram of the model is shown in Figure 3.Figure 3
Schematic diagram of the model simulation streamline. Dense streamlines refer to high fluid flow, and sparse streamlines refer to low fluid flow.According to the established initial physical model and combined with Equation (6), the three typical parameters of fluid flow velocity u, connected channel diameter d, and channel length l are selected for analysis. Each parameter value of the model is changed by using the control variable method. The variation of the concentration curve at the outlet of the model with each parameter can be observed and studied.


#### 3.1.1. Different Fluid Flow Velocity

To study the influence of the interwell fluid flow velocity (u in Equation (6)) on the tracer concentration curve, a single connected channel model is adopted, as shown in Figure 2. The basic parameters of the model in Table 1 are kept unchanged, and only the injection velocity at the inlet is changed to 0.05 m/s, 0.1 m/s, and 0.15 m/s. The results are discussed below.It can be analyzed from Figure4(a) that the faster the fluid flow velocity, the greater the tracer concentration, the smaller the peak area of the concentration graph, the higher the peak, and the earlier the concentration breakthrough time.Figure 4
Influence of model parameters on tracer concentration curve: (a) different fluid flow velocity; (b) different connected channel diameter; (c) different connected channel length.
(a)(b)(c)


#### 3.1.2. Different Connected Channel Diameter

To study the influence of the interwell connected channel diameter (d in Equation (6)) on the tracer concentration curve, a single connected channel model is adopted, as shown in Figure 2. Set the fluid flow velocity at the inlet to 0.15 m/s. The other basic parameters of the model in Table 1 are kept unchanged, and only the connected channel diameter is changed to 8 mm, 10 mm, and 12 mm. The results are discussed, respectively.It can be analyzed from Figure4(b) that the larger the diameter of the connected channel in the model, the smaller the tracer concentration, the smaller the peak area of the concentration graph, and the lower the peak. However, these changes are not obvious.


#### 3.1.3. Different Connected Channel Length

To study the influence of the interwell connected channel length (l in Equation (6)) on the tracer concentration curve, a single connected channel model is adopted, as shown in Figure 2. Set the fluid flow velocity at the inlet to 0.15 m/s. The other basic parameters of the model in Table 1 are kept unchanged, and only the connected channel length is changed to 60 mm, 90 mm, and 120 mm. The results are discussed, respectively.It can be analyzed from Figure4(c) that the longer the length of the connected channel in the model, the smaller the tracer concentration, the smaller the peak area of the concentration graph, the lower the peak, and the later the concentration breakthrough time.In summary, when the flow velocity of the fluid passing through the connected channel decreases, the diameter and length of the connected channel increase, and the tracer concentration changes with a decreasing trend. Moreover, the flow velocity and the length of the connected channel also affect the breakthrough time of the tracer concentration curve. The summary is shown in Table2.Table 2
Sensitivity analysis and summary of each parameter.
Changed parametersConclusionFluid flow velocityVelocity↑, tracer concentration↑, the peak↑, the peak area of the concentration graph↓Connected channel diameterConnected channel diameter↑, tracer concentration↓, the peak↓, the peak area of the concentration graph↓Connected channel lengthConnected channel length↑, tracer concentration↓, the peak↓, the peak area of the concentration graph↓However, not only is it the inherent physical parameters of these models that influence the change of the resulting tracer concentration curve but also the shape of the connected channel determines the shape of the tracer concentration curve. There are many types and complex relationships of interwell connected channels in carbonate fractured-vuggy low-permeability reservoirs, so it is urgent to study the influence of different interwell connection modes on the tracer concentration curve shape.


### 3.2. Influence of Interwell Connection Mode on Tracer Concentration Curve

To further study the influence of the interwell connectivity mode on tracer concentration, different connectivity models were established by using FEM software’s preprocessing module. The flow velocity here is set to 0.8 m/s. The length of the connected channel is fixed at 90 mm, and only the style of the connected channel is changed. The simulation results of different connected models are classified and discussed. According to the characteristics of the tracer concentration curve results, the curve types can be divided into 4 major categories, and different types reflect different interwell connections.


#### 3.2.1. Unimodal Curve

As shown in Figures5 and 6, the tracer concentration curve presents a single peak shape, with a steep unimodal curve and a gentle unimodal curve. The steep unimodal curve shows that the tracer concentration curve has a large slope, reflecting that there is only a single small-volume connecting channel between injection-production wells and no other channel. Limited dispersion is the main reason for the rapid change of tracer concentration. The gentle unimodal curve shows the small slope of the tracer concentration curve, reflecting the single large-volume connecting channel between the injection and production wells. The great dispersion caused the slow change rate of tracer concentration.Figure 5
Schematic diagram and model of interwell connected channel and tracer concentration curve (steep unimodal curve): (a) 2D; (b) 3D; (c) tracer concentration change at the outlet.
(a)(b)(c)Figure 6
Schematic diagram and model of the interwell connected channel and tracer concentration curve (gentle unimodal curve): (a) 2D; (b) 3D; (c) tracer concentration change at the outlet.
(a)(b)(c)


#### 3.2.2. Bimodal Curve

As shown in Figure7, the tracer concentration curve presents a double peak shape. The bimodal curve shows that the concentration of the tracer has the curvilinear characteristics of a two-stage wave peak. It reflects that the injection and production wells are connected through two connecting channels, and the volume of the two connecting channels affects the peak value of the tracer concentration curve and the rate of concentration change. A part of the fluid with the tracer will inevitably flow to the production well first through the channel with low resistance, which is the reason for the inconsistency of the arrival time on the concentration curve.Figure 7
Schematic diagram and model of interwell connected channel and tracer concentration curve (bimodal curve): (a) 2D; (b) 3D; (c) tracer concentration change at the outlet.
(a)(b)(c)


#### 3.2.3. Multimodal Curve

As shown in Figure8, the tracer concentration curve shows the shape of multiple peaks. The multimodal curve shows that the tracer concentration has multiple peaks and the peaks vary in height. It reflects that there are multiple connecting channels between injection-production wells, which is a combination mode of large-volume connected channels and small-volume connected channels. Figure 8 shows three connecting channels between injection-production wells. In view of the difference in the size of the connected channels, the time and height of the peak of the tracer concentration curve were also slightly different. The reason for the inconsistency of the arrival time on the concentration curve is the same as that in Section 3.2.2.Figure 8
Schematic diagram and model of interwell connected channel and tracer concentration curve (multimodal curve): (a) 2D; (b) 3D; (c) tracer concentration change at the outlet.
(a)(b)(c)The analysis and summary are shown in Table3.Table 3
Summary of tracer concentration curve characteristics of each model.
Characteristics of the modelCharacteristics of tracer concentration curveSingle small-volume connecting channelThe steep unimodal curveSingle large-volume connecting channelThe gentle unimodal curveTwo connecting channelsBimodal curveMultiple connecting channelsMultimodal curveBecause the data obtained from field sampling in oilfields is generally related to tracer fluorescence intensity and time, it is necessary to seek the linear relationship between tracer solution concentration and fluorescence intensity. As follows,(13)F=2.303⋅ϕf⋅I0⋅E⋅b⋅Cm.In the case of fixed determination conditions, the fluorescence intensity of the tracer solution is in direct proportion to its concentration:(14)F=KCm,whereF is the fluorescence intensity, I0 is the intensity of incident light, ϕf is the fluorescence quantum efficiency, E is the absorption coefficient, Cm is the mass concentration of the substance, and K is the direct proportionality coefficient.Based on the above conclusions, according to the classification of the interconnection methods between wells researched by different curve shapes, the monitoring results of the tracer at the Tahe site can be classified, analyzed, and discussed.


## 3.1. Influence of Model Parameters on Tracer Concentration Curve

This section is based on the physical model established in Section2.1. The inlet is set to flow into the tracer mixture and the outlet to flow out. The simulation streamline diagram of the model is shown in Figure 3.Figure 3
Schematic diagram of the model simulation streamline. Dense streamlines refer to high fluid flow, and sparse streamlines refer to low fluid flow.According to the established initial physical model and combined with Equation (6), the three typical parameters of fluid flow velocity u, connected channel diameter d, and channel length l are selected for analysis. Each parameter value of the model is changed by using the control variable method. The variation of the concentration curve at the outlet of the model with each parameter can be observed and studied.


### 3.1.1. Different Fluid Flow Velocity

To study the influence of the interwell fluid flow velocity (u in Equation (6)) on the tracer concentration curve, a single connected channel model is adopted, as shown in Figure 2. The basic parameters of the model in Table 1 are kept unchanged, and only the injection velocity at the inlet is changed to 0.05 m/s, 0.1 m/s, and 0.15 m/s. The results are discussed below.It can be analyzed from Figure4(a) that the faster the fluid flow velocity, the greater the tracer concentration, the smaller the peak area of the concentration graph, the higher the peak, and the earlier the concentration breakthrough time.Figure 4
Influence of model parameters on tracer concentration curve: (a) different fluid flow velocity; (b) different connected channel diameter; (c) different connected channel length.
(a)(b)(c)


### 3.1.2. Different Connected Channel Diameter

To study the influence of the interwell connected channel diameter (d in Equation (6)) on the tracer concentration curve, a single connected channel model is adopted, as shown in Figure 2. Set the fluid flow velocity at the inlet to 0.15 m/s. The other basic parameters of the model in Table 1 are kept unchanged, and only the connected channel diameter is changed to 8 mm, 10 mm, and 12 mm. The results are discussed, respectively.It can be analyzed from Figure4(b) that the larger the diameter of the connected channel in the model, the smaller the tracer concentration, the smaller the peak area of the concentration graph, and the lower the peak. However, these changes are not obvious.


### 3.1.3. Different Connected Channel Length

To study the influence of the interwell connected channel length (l in Equation (6)) on the tracer concentration curve, a single connected channel model is adopted, as shown in Figure 2. Set the fluid flow velocity at the inlet to 0.15 m/s. The other basic parameters of the model in Table 1 are kept unchanged, and only the connected channel length is changed to 60 mm, 90 mm, and 120 mm. The results are discussed, respectively.It can be analyzed from Figure4(c) that the longer the length of the connected channel in the model, the smaller the tracer concentration, the smaller the peak area of the concentration graph, the lower the peak, and the later the concentration breakthrough time.In summary, when the flow velocity of the fluid passing through the connected channel decreases, the diameter and length of the connected channel increase, and the tracer concentration changes with a decreasing trend. Moreover, the flow velocity and the length of the connected channel also affect the breakthrough time of the tracer concentration curve. The summary is shown in Table2.Table 2
Sensitivity analysis and summary of each parameter.
Changed parametersConclusionFluid flow velocityVelocity↑, tracer concentration↑, the peak↑, the peak area of the concentration graph↓Connected channel diameterConnected channel diameter↑, tracer concentration↓, the peak↓, the peak area of the concentration graph↓Connected channel lengthConnected channel length↑, tracer concentration↓, the peak↓, the peak area of the concentration graph↓However, not only is it the inherent physical parameters of these models that influence the change of the resulting tracer concentration curve but also the shape of the connected channel determines the shape of the tracer concentration curve. There are many types and complex relationships of interwell connected channels in carbonate fractured-vuggy low-permeability reservoirs, so it is urgent to study the influence of different interwell connection modes on the tracer concentration curve shape.


## 3.1.1. Different Fluid Flow Velocity

To study the influence of the interwell fluid flow velocity (u in Equation (6)) on the tracer concentration curve, a single connected channel model is adopted, as shown in Figure 2. The basic parameters of the model in Table 1 are kept unchanged, and only the injection velocity at the inlet is changed to 0.05 m/s, 0.1 m/s, and 0.15 m/s. The results are discussed below.It can be analyzed from Figure4(a) that the faster the fluid flow velocity, the greater the tracer concentration, the smaller the peak area of the concentration graph, the higher the peak, and the earlier the concentration breakthrough time.Figure 4
Influence of model parameters on tracer concentration curve: (a) different fluid flow velocity; (b) different connected channel diameter; (c) different connected channel length.
(a)(b)(c)


## 3.1.2. Different Connected Channel Diameter

To study the influence of the interwell connected channel diameter (d in Equation (6)) on the tracer concentration curve, a single connected channel model is adopted, as shown in Figure 2. Set the fluid flow velocity at the inlet to 0.15 m/s. The other basic parameters of the model in Table 1 are kept unchanged, and only the connected channel diameter is changed to 8 mm, 10 mm, and 12 mm. The results are discussed, respectively.It can be analyzed from Figure4(b) that the larger the diameter of the connected channel in the model, the smaller the tracer concentration, the smaller the peak area of the concentration graph, and the lower the peak. However, these changes are not obvious.


## 3.1.3. Different Connected Channel Length

To study the influence of the interwell connected channel length (l in Equation (6)) on the tracer concentration curve, a single connected channel model is adopted, as shown in Figure 2. Set the fluid flow velocity at the inlet to 0.15 m/s. The other basic parameters of the model in Table 1 are kept unchanged, and only the connected channel length is changed to 60 mm, 90 mm, and 120 mm. The results are discussed, respectively.It can be analyzed from Figure4(c) that the longer the length of the connected channel in the model, the smaller the tracer concentration, the smaller the peak area of the concentration graph, the lower the peak, and the later the concentration breakthrough time.In summary, when the flow velocity of the fluid passing through the connected channel decreases, the diameter and length of the connected channel increase, and the tracer concentration changes with a decreasing trend. Moreover, the flow velocity and the length of the connected channel also affect the breakthrough time of the tracer concentration curve. The summary is shown in Table2.Table 2
Sensitivity analysis and summary of each parameter.
Changed parametersConclusionFluid flow velocityVelocity↑, tracer concentration↑, the peak↑, the peak area of the concentration graph↓Connected channel diameterConnected channel diameter↑, tracer concentration↓, the peak↓, the peak area of the concentration graph↓Connected channel lengthConnected channel length↑, tracer concentration↓, the peak↓, the peak area of the concentration graph↓However, not only is it the inherent physical parameters of these models that influence the change of the resulting tracer concentration curve but also the shape of the connected channel determines the shape of the tracer concentration curve. There are many types and complex relationships of interwell connected channels in carbonate fractured-vuggy low-permeability reservoirs, so it is urgent to study the influence of different interwell connection modes on the tracer concentration curve shape.


## 3.2. Influence of Interwell Connection Mode on Tracer Concentration Curve

To further study the influence of the interwell connectivity mode on tracer concentration, different connectivity models were established by using FEM software’s preprocessing module. The flow velocity here is set to 0.8 m/s. The length of the connected channel is fixed at 90 mm, and only the style of the connected channel is changed. The simulation results of different connected models are classified and discussed. According to the characteristics of the tracer concentration curve results, the curve types can be divided into 4 major categories, and different types reflect different interwell connections.


### 3.2.1. Unimodal Curve

As shown in Figures5 and 6, the tracer concentration curve presents a single peak shape, with a steep unimodal curve and a gentle unimodal curve. The steep unimodal curve shows that the tracer concentration curve has a large slope, reflecting that there is only a single small-volume connecting channel between injection-production wells and no other channel. Limited dispersion is the main reason for the rapid change of tracer concentration. The gentle unimodal curve shows the small slope of the tracer concentration curve, reflecting the single large-volume connecting channel between the injection and production wells. The great dispersion caused the slow change rate of tracer concentration.Figure 5
Schematic diagram and model of interwell connected channel and tracer concentration curve (steep unimodal curve): (a) 2D; (b) 3D; (c) tracer concentration change at the outlet.
(a)(b)(c)Figure 6
Schematic diagram and model of the interwell connected channel and tracer concentration curve (gentle unimodal curve): (a) 2D; (b) 3D; (c) tracer concentration change at the outlet.
(a)(b)(c)


### 3.2.2. Bimodal Curve

As shown in Figure7, the tracer concentration curve presents a double peak shape. The bimodal curve shows that the concentration of the tracer has the curvilinear characteristics of a two-stage wave peak. It reflects that the injection and production wells are connected through two connecting channels, and the volume of the two connecting channels affects the peak value of the tracer concentration curve and the rate of concentration change. A part of the fluid with the tracer will inevitably flow to the production well first through the channel with low resistance, which is the reason for the inconsistency of the arrival time on the concentration curve.Figure 7
Schematic diagram and model of interwell connected channel and tracer concentration curve (bimodal curve): (a) 2D; (b) 3D; (c) tracer concentration change at the outlet.
(a)(b)(c)


### 3.2.3. Multimodal Curve

As shown in Figure8, the tracer concentration curve shows the shape of multiple peaks. The multimodal curve shows that the tracer concentration has multiple peaks and the peaks vary in height. It reflects that there are multiple connecting channels between injection-production wells, which is a combination mode of large-volume connected channels and small-volume connected channels. Figure 8 shows three connecting channels between injection-production wells. In view of the difference in the size of the connected channels, the time and height of the peak of the tracer concentration curve were also slightly different. The reason for the inconsistency of the arrival time on the concentration curve is the same as that in Section 3.2.2.Figure 8
Schematic diagram and model of interwell connected channel and tracer concentration curve (multimodal curve): (a) 2D; (b) 3D; (c) tracer concentration change at the outlet.
(a)(b)(c)The analysis and summary are shown in Table3.Table 3
Summary of tracer concentration curve characteristics of each model.
Characteristics of the modelCharacteristics of tracer concentration curveSingle small-volume connecting channelThe steep unimodal curveSingle large-volume connecting channelThe gentle unimodal curveTwo connecting channelsBimodal curveMultiple connecting channelsMultimodal curveBecause the data obtained from field sampling in oilfields is generally related to tracer fluorescence intensity and time, it is necessary to seek the linear relationship between tracer solution concentration and fluorescence intensity. As follows,(13)F=2.303⋅ϕf⋅I0⋅E⋅b⋅Cm.In the case of fixed determination conditions, the fluorescence intensity of the tracer solution is in direct proportion to its concentration:(14)F=KCm,whereF is the fluorescence intensity, I0 is the intensity of incident light, ϕf is the fluorescence quantum efficiency, E is the absorption coefficient, Cm is the mass concentration of the substance, and K is the direct proportionality coefficient.Based on the above conclusions, according to the classification of the interconnection methods between wells researched by different curve shapes, the monitoring results of the tracer at the Tahe site can be classified, analyzed, and discussed.


## 3.2.1. Unimodal Curve

As shown in Figures5 and 6, the tracer concentration curve presents a single peak shape, with a steep unimodal curve and a gentle unimodal curve. The steep unimodal curve shows that the tracer concentration curve has a large slope, reflecting that there is only a single small-volume connecting channel between injection-production wells and no other channel. Limited dispersion is the main reason for the rapid change of tracer concentration. The gentle unimodal curve shows the small slope of the tracer concentration curve, reflecting the single large-volume connecting channel between the injection and production wells. The great dispersion caused the slow change rate of tracer concentration.Figure 5
Schematic diagram and model of interwell connected channel and tracer concentration curve (steep unimodal curve): (a) 2D; (b) 3D; (c) tracer concentration change at the outlet.
(a)(b)(c)Figure 6
Schematic diagram and model of the interwell connected channel and tracer concentration curve (gentle unimodal curve): (a) 2D; (b) 3D; (c) tracer concentration change at the outlet.
(a)(b)(c)


## 3.2.2. Bimodal Curve

As shown in Figure7, the tracer concentration curve presents a double peak shape. The bimodal curve shows that the concentration of the tracer has the curvilinear characteristics of a two-stage wave peak. It reflects that the injection and production wells are connected through two connecting channels, and the volume of the two connecting channels affects the peak value of the tracer concentration curve and the rate of concentration change. A part of the fluid with the tracer will inevitably flow to the production well first through the channel with low resistance, which is the reason for the inconsistency of the arrival time on the concentration curve.Figure 7
Schematic diagram and model of interwell connected channel and tracer concentration curve (bimodal curve): (a) 2D; (b) 3D; (c) tracer concentration change at the outlet.
(a)(b)(c)


## 3.2.3. Multimodal Curve

As shown in Figure8, the tracer concentration curve shows the shape of multiple peaks. The multimodal curve shows that the tracer concentration has multiple peaks and the peaks vary in height. It reflects that there are multiple connecting channels between injection-production wells, which is a combination mode of large-volume connected channels and small-volume connected channels. Figure 8 shows three connecting channels between injection-production wells. In view of the difference in the size of the connected channels, the time and height of the peak of the tracer concentration curve were also slightly different. The reason for the inconsistency of the arrival time on the concentration curve is the same as that in Section 3.2.2.Figure 8
Schematic diagram and model of interwell connected channel and tracer concentration curve (multimodal curve): (a) 2D; (b) 3D; (c) tracer concentration change at the outlet.
(a)(b)(c)The analysis and summary are shown in Table3.Table 3
Summary of tracer concentration curve characteristics of each model.
Characteristics of the modelCharacteristics of tracer concentration curveSingle small-volume connecting channelThe steep unimodal curveSingle large-volume connecting channelThe gentle unimodal curveTwo connecting channelsBimodal curveMultiple connecting channelsMultimodal curveBecause the data obtained from field sampling in oilfields is generally related to tracer fluorescence intensity and time, it is necessary to seek the linear relationship between tracer solution concentration and fluorescence intensity. As follows,(13)F=2.303⋅ϕf⋅I0⋅E⋅b⋅Cm.In the case of fixed determination conditions, the fluorescence intensity of the tracer solution is in direct proportion to its concentration:(14)F=KCm,whereF is the fluorescence intensity, I0 is the intensity of incident light, ϕf is the fluorescence quantum efficiency, E is the absorption coefficient, Cm is the mass concentration of the substance, and K is the direct proportionality coefficient.Based on the above conclusions, according to the classification of the interconnection methods between wells researched by different curve shapes, the monitoring results of the tracer at the Tahe site can be classified, analyzed, and discussed.


## 4. Analysis of Example Wells in Tahe Oilfield

### 4.1. Overview of Well Groups

The tectonic location of Tahe Oilfield belongs to the southwest of the Akkule uplift in the middle part of the Shaya uplift in Tarim Basin. The west of Akkule uplift is the Harahatang depression, the east is the Caohu depression, the south is the Mangal depression, and the north is the Yakra fault convex. The reservoir is a carbonate rock karst fracture-vuggy-type reservoir, which is controlled by tectonic faults and multistage karst on the basis of the reservoir and formed by multiset fracture-vuggy system superposed in three-dimensional space. The storage space is dominated by karst caves. The relationship between oil and water in the reservoir is complex, controlled by different fracture and hole systems, and there is locally trapped water and active bottom water.To judge the connection relationship of the wells in the unit and provide a basis for the adjustment of injection and production parameters of the unit in the later stage of water injection, the tracer was added during the water injection period of the T826 well, and samples from its six adjacent wells were used as tracer monitoring. There are 3 venting wells in this group of monitoring wells: T705 lost well section: 6104.21-6207 m, a total of 209.2 m3 of lost mud; T826 lost well section: 5779.56-5788.07 m, a total of 166.6 m3 of lost mud; and T849 lost well section: 5819.00-5822.51 m, a total of 561m3 of lost mud.


### 4.2. Calculation of Injection Volume of Tracer

To enable the oilfield injection and production wells to monitor the tracer normally, it is usually necessary to determine the maximum dilution concentration of the tracer first to avoid problems such as failure to monitor and analyze. According to the formula of maximum average dilution volume,(15)Vp=πR2⋅H⋅C⋅ϕ⋅N⋅Sw⋅a⋅λ,(16)λ=1+∑1nh1+h2+⋯+hn−1+hn∑1nH1+H2+⋯+Hn−1+Hn+∑1nq1+q2+⋯+qn−1+qnVmax,whereVp is the maximum dilution volume of the tracer, R is the average well distance between the water injection well and each production well, H is the average reservoir thickness, C is the constant water absorption thickness coefficient, ϕ is the porosity, N is the reservoir shape coefficient, Sw is the water saturation, a is the water injection sweep coefficient, λ is the hole coefficient, h1⋯hn is the leakage section of the monitoring well, H1⋯Hn is the production section of the monitoring well, n is the number of monitoring wells, q is the leakage of the monitoring well, and Vmax is the maximum dilution volume of the monitoring well.Using Equation (17) and Table 4, the dosage of the tracer can be calculated as 18 kg.
(17)A=S⋅Vp⋅μ,Table 4
Calculation table of the maximum dilution volume of tracer.
ParameterWell groupReservoir shape factorAverage reservoir radius (m)Average reservoir thickness (m)Equal water absorption thickness coefficientAverage reservoir porosity (%)Water saturation (%)Sweep coefficient of water injectionCoefficient of the holeMaximum dilution volume of tracer (×104 m3)T8260.51647.458.40.30.30.550.351.2517.33whereA is the dosage of the tracer, S is the detection sensitivity of the tracer, and μ is the margin coefficient.After determining the dosage of the tracer used in Well T826, the injection parameters of the well group should be optimized (see Table5). The injection pressure should be close to the injection pressure before the tracer is injected or higher than the original water injection pressure.Table 5
Optimization table of each parameter of tracer injection.
Well numberTracer typeTracer dosage (kg)Preparation concentration (%)Operating pipe stringInjection pressure (MPa)Dosing amount of tracer (L)T826Fluorescent tracer18100The original stringWater injection pressure18


### 4.3. Analysis of Tracer Test Results

By sorting out the tracer monitoring data of the six adjacent wells in the T-Well Group of Tahe, the tracer fluorescence intensity (FI) curve obtained can be summarized according to the classification in Section3.2 as shown in Table 6.Table 6
Classification table of tracer fluorescence intensity curve in monitoring wells of T-Well Group.
Well numberTypeFluorescence intensity (FI) curveT849UnimodalT10406BimodalT719T705T10263MultimodalT847Combined with the results of the previous exploration, the comprehensive curve analysis, and Equation (14), the following conclusions can be drawn: tracer fluorescence intensity curve (proportional to the concentration curve, for the convenience of analysis, only the concentration curve will be mentioned below) of Well T849 shows that there is only a single small-volume connected channel with poor conductivity between injection and production wells. There are two large-volume connecting channels between injection and production wells in Well T10406, but the concentration of the tracer produced is not high, which means that the channel has a general conductivity. There are two connecting channels with a large difference in conductivity between the wells of Well T719, and their volumes are also greatly different. Tracer production concentration performance is good, and the channel conductivity is strong. There are two small-volume connecting channels between the injection and production wells in Well T705. The tracer concentration curve of Well T10263 was of the multipeak type, which showed that there were three small connected channels with similar conductivity between injection and production wells. Well T847 was characterized by the coexistence of three large-volume and several small-volume connected channels.According to the tracer monitoring response data, the propulsion velocity is calculated by the interval between each well and the regional structure diagram; a waterline propulsion velocity diagram is drawn as shown in Figure9. This figure is consistent with the above analysis results, indicating that the results of the peak type classification are reliable and in line with the actual situation.Figure 9
Waterline propulsion velocity diagram of T-Well Group. The blue dot represents injection well and the red dots represent production wells.


## 4.1. Overview of Well Groups

The tectonic location of Tahe Oilfield belongs to the southwest of the Akkule uplift in the middle part of the Shaya uplift in Tarim Basin. The west of Akkule uplift is the Harahatang depression, the east is the Caohu depression, the south is the Mangal depression, and the north is the Yakra fault convex. The reservoir is a carbonate rock karst fracture-vuggy-type reservoir, which is controlled by tectonic faults and multistage karst on the basis of the reservoir and formed by multiset fracture-vuggy system superposed in three-dimensional space. The storage space is dominated by karst caves. The relationship between oil and water in the reservoir is complex, controlled by different fracture and hole systems, and there is locally trapped water and active bottom water.To judge the connection relationship of the wells in the unit and provide a basis for the adjustment of injection and production parameters of the unit in the later stage of water injection, the tracer was added during the water injection period of the T826 well, and samples from its six adjacent wells were used as tracer monitoring. There are 3 venting wells in this group of monitoring wells: T705 lost well section: 6104.21-6207 m, a total of 209.2 m3 of lost mud; T826 lost well section: 5779.56-5788.07 m, a total of 166.6 m3 of lost mud; and T849 lost well section: 5819.00-5822.51 m, a total of 561m3 of lost mud.


## 4.2. Calculation of Injection Volume of Tracer

To enable the oilfield injection and production wells to monitor the tracer normally, it is usually necessary to determine the maximum dilution concentration of the tracer first to avoid problems such as failure to monitor and analyze. According to the formula of maximum average dilution volume,(15)Vp=πR2⋅H⋅C⋅ϕ⋅N⋅Sw⋅a⋅λ,(16)λ=1+∑1nh1+h2+⋯+hn−1+hn∑1nH1+H2+⋯+Hn−1+Hn+∑1nq1+q2+⋯+qn−1+qnVmax,whereVp is the maximum dilution volume of the tracer, R is the average well distance between the water injection well and each production well, H is the average reservoir thickness, C is the constant water absorption thickness coefficient, ϕ is the porosity, N is the reservoir shape coefficient, Sw is the water saturation, a is the water injection sweep coefficient, λ is the hole coefficient, h1⋯hn is the leakage section of the monitoring well, H1⋯Hn is the production section of the monitoring well, n is the number of monitoring wells, q is the leakage of the monitoring well, and Vmax is the maximum dilution volume of the monitoring well.Using Equation (17) and Table 4, the dosage of the tracer can be calculated as 18 kg.
(17)A=S⋅Vp⋅μ,Table 4
Calculation table of the maximum dilution volume of tracer.
ParameterWell groupReservoir shape factorAverage reservoir radius (m)Average reservoir thickness (m)Equal water absorption thickness coefficientAverage reservoir porosity (%)Water saturation (%)Sweep coefficient of water injectionCoefficient of the holeMaximum dilution volume of tracer (×104 m3)T8260.51647.458.40.30.30.550.351.2517.33whereA is the dosage of the tracer, S is the detection sensitivity of the tracer, and μ is the margin coefficient.After determining the dosage of the tracer used in Well T826, the injection parameters of the well group should be optimized (see Table5). The injection pressure should be close to the injection pressure before the tracer is injected or higher than the original water injection pressure.Table 5
Optimization table of each parameter of tracer injection.
Well numberTracer typeTracer dosage (kg)Preparation concentration (%)Operating pipe stringInjection pressure (MPa)Dosing amount of tracer (L)T826Fluorescent tracer18100The original stringWater injection pressure18


## 4.3. Analysis of Tracer Test Results

By sorting out the tracer monitoring data of the six adjacent wells in the T-Well Group of Tahe, the tracer fluorescence intensity (FI) curve obtained can be summarized according to the classification in Section3.2 as shown in Table 6.Table 6
Classification table of tracer fluorescence intensity curve in monitoring wells of T-Well Group.
Well numberTypeFluorescence intensity (FI) curveT849UnimodalT10406BimodalT719T705T10263MultimodalT847Combined with the results of the previous exploration, the comprehensive curve analysis, and Equation (14), the following conclusions can be drawn: tracer fluorescence intensity curve (proportional to the concentration curve, for the convenience of analysis, only the concentration curve will be mentioned below) of Well T849 shows that there is only a single small-volume connected channel with poor conductivity between injection and production wells. There are two large-volume connecting channels between injection and production wells in Well T10406, but the concentration of the tracer produced is not high, which means that the channel has a general conductivity. There are two connecting channels with a large difference in conductivity between the wells of Well T719, and their volumes are also greatly different. Tracer production concentration performance is good, and the channel conductivity is strong. There are two small-volume connecting channels between the injection and production wells in Well T705. The tracer concentration curve of Well T10263 was of the multipeak type, which showed that there were three small connected channels with similar conductivity between injection and production wells. Well T847 was characterized by the coexistence of three large-volume and several small-volume connected channels.According to the tracer monitoring response data, the propulsion velocity is calculated by the interval between each well and the regional structure diagram; a waterline propulsion velocity diagram is drawn as shown in Figure9. This figure is consistent with the above analysis results, indicating that the results of the peak type classification are reliable and in line with the actual situation.Figure 9
Waterline propulsion velocity diagram of T-Well Group. The blue dot represents injection well and the red dots represent production wells.


## 5. Discussions and Conclusions

The tracer monitoring technology is simpler, more intuitive, and easier to operate than other technologies for evaluating interwell connectivity. To conduct a more detailed study on the tracer monitoring results, based on the CFD method, FEM software was used as a CFD simulation tool to discuss and classify the law of tracer concentration curve according to different fracture-vuggy structure modes. The example T-Well Group also verified the research results. Specifically, the following conclusions were reached:(1)
Some physical parameters of the model will have an impact on the concentration of tracer, which is shown in the following aspects: when the flow velocity of the fluid passing through the connected channel decreases, the diameter and length of the connected channel increase; the tracer concentration changes with a decreasing trend. Moreover, the flow velocity and the length of the connected channel also affect the breakthrough time of the tracer concentration curve(2)
Different connectivity models are established by software. According to the simulation, the tracer concentration curve can be classified into three types: unimodal curve, bimodal curve, and multimodal curve(i)
The unimodal curve represents a single interwell connecting channel, and the small or large channel volume determines the steepness or gentleness of the single-peak curve of the tracer concentration(ii)
The bimodal curve represents two interwell connecting channels, and the volume of the channel determines the peak value of the tracer concentration curve(iii)
The multimodal curve represents multiple interwell connecting channels, which may be more of a combination mode with the coexistence of large and small connected channels. The size of the channel volume determines the time and height of the peak of the tracer concentration(3)
To further verify the classification results of the connected channels, a field example of the T-Well Group in the Tahe Oilfield was discussed. After sorting and summarizing the data, the tracer concentration curves obtained from 6 wells in the Tahe T-Well Group can be divided into three categories: unimodal type, bimodal type, and multimodal type. It can be concluded that the connecting channels of T849, T10406, and T705 are not strong in conductivity. The connecting channels of T719, T10263, and T847 have relatively strong flow conductivity. The comparison between the waterline propulsive velocity diagram and the above analysis results shows that the peak type classification results are reliable and in line with the actual situation(4)
The model established in this paper is just a basic simple model. Therefore, to have a more comprehensive and in-depth understanding of fluid migration in the complex interwell connected channels in the carbonate reservoirs, further and deeper studies on this part should be made in the future



---

*Source: 5572902-2021-07-31.xml*