# Mechanism of Fire Prevention with Liquid Carbon Dioxide and Application of Long-Distance Pressure-Holding Transportation Technology Based on Shallow Buried and Near-Horizontal Goaf Geological Conditions

Authors: Naifu Cao; Yuntao Liang
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

Shallow burial, very close coal seam groups, and spontaneous combustion are typical characteristics of most coal seams in the Shendong mining area, China. With the continuous extension of the production level of various mines, some mining areas have gradually shown complex production conditions including multiple types of fire forms such as those in coal fields, small kilns, and multilayer mined-out and hidden high-temperature areas, resulting in fire control difficultly and posing threats to safety. With the aim of limiting the above problems, in this work, the liquid carbon dioxide fire prevention technology is focused on. Phase change and migration law of CO2 in the goaf are studied. Through the study on the influence of the use of liquid CO2 on the cooling law of high-temperature coal and on its spontaneous combustion characteristics and through thermal analysis experiments, it was observed that the porosity of loose coal has a significant impact on the cooling effect of carbon dioxide. Moreover, it was emphasized that the higher the CO2 concentration, the higher the rise in temperature of coal oxidation, and the increase of CO2 concentration was able to affect apparent activation of coal oxidation, leading to a theoretical basis to explain the effect of CO2 in inhibiting coal spontaneous combustion. The utilization of Fluent numerical modeling allowed us to simulate the diffusion radius of liquid CO2 injected into the goaf, to study the effective inerting radius of liquid CO2 on the left coal in the goaf. After comprehensive analysis of experiments and numerical simulations, appropriate equipment and process flow are selected and designed. Taking the Huojitujing well of Daliuta Coal Mine in Shendong mining area as the industrial test site, an intelligent pressure-holding transportation of liquid CO2 in the 1000 m transportation pipeline was developed. The surface liquid CO2 infusion capacity was 20 t/h, and the pressure-holding interval at the end of the transportation pipeline was determined to be 1.0–2.3 MPa. The maximum diffusion radius of the mined-out area is 300 m under the effect of positive air flow and self-expansion and diffusion of CO2 gas in the roadway. Under the influence of reverse wind flow and self-expansion and diffusion, the diffusion radius of the goaf is 150 m, and the maximum storage time of gaseous CO2 in the goaf is 27 h. Liquid CO2 was injected into the area with relevant presence of CO, an indicator of possible fires. Practice has proved that, after 65 hours and two perfusion processes, the CO concentration dropped from 790 ppm to 41 ppm, which indicates that liquid CO2 has a significant effect on fire prevention.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Fire prevention is one of the most important research topics in the field of coal mine safety in China. At present, technologies for the prevention of spontaneous combustion such as the use of inert gas, grouting, gel injection, and mine resistance are widely utilized. However, each technology has its specific range of application conditions and limitations [1]. For example, the use of nitrogen injection limits issues related to heat development [2]. On the other hand, nitrogen can diffuse, and leaks problems can be present [3]. Liquid nitrogen can easily freeze in the goaf, and the cost of this process is high. Long characteristic times of slurry transport in the grouting technology and small grouting diffusion radius limit the effect of this technology in achieving large-scale coverage of the goaf [4]. The temperature reduction range upon glue injection is small, and the spontaneous combustion fire cannot be effectively controlled. Due to the concealment of spontaneous combustion and fire location, the conventional glue injection cannot accurately reach the fire source location. Short inhibition times characterize the use of an inhibitor agent [5]. Through relevant research and tests in recent years, it has been seen that liquid CO2 can be utilized to prevent spontaneous combustion in the goaf, with advantages related to CO2 low temperature and inert properties. The CO2 density is high, the gas can stay in the goaf for a long time, and the inerting time is relatively long. Coal can adsorb CO2, and this can effectively prevent the contact between O2 and coal itself [6]. Therefore, compared with traditional fire prevention technology, the one based on the use of CO2 has advantages that deserve further investigation.In this paper, through experimental research, numerical simulation, technological equipment design, and field test, the phase change and migration law of CO2 in the goaf are addressed, and the technology of fire prevention through the use of liquid CO2 is developed. Field tests are guided by aspects concerning fluid mechanics, heat transfer, chemical reaction kinetics, and field measured data, based on the characteristics of the shallow burial and the near-level superlarge goaf in the Shendong mining area, China, selected as a case study.


## 2. Rationale of the Research Project

Most of the main coal seams in the Shendong mining area have the typical characteristics of shallow burial, short distance coal seams, easy spontaneous combustion, and so on [7]. According to the actual conditions of coal seams in various mining areas, Shenhua Group has carried out exploration work for the construction and production of superlarge mines. With the continuous extension of the production level of various mines, some mining areas have gradually shown complex production conditions where multiple types of fires form. The coexistence of fires in different locations and of hidden areas characterized by high temperature makes fire management more difficult and poses threats to mine production safety.The development of pores and fissures of coal samples in the Shendong mining area at different magnifications is shown in Figures1–3 .Figure 1
SEM images of samples in Bulianta Coal Mine at different magnifications (3000, 20000, and 70000x from left to right).
(a)(b)(c)Figure 2
SEM images of samples in Shigetai Coal Mine at different magnifications (3000, 20000, and 70000x from left to right).
(a)(b)(c)Figure 3
SEM images of samples in Wanli Coal Mine at different magnifications (3000, 20000, and 70000x from left to right).
(a)(b)(c)From the scanning electron microscope (SEM) images, it can be found that there are different porosities or crack structures on the surface of the coal samples. The width of the pores and cracks is basically at the micron level; however, the degree of crack development changes from sample to sample. The charcoal striped silk structure can be seen at 3000x magnification, leading to a large specific surface area. At 20000x, it is seen that the coal samples have fully developed pores and good connectivity between the pores. Micron-scale cracks are fully developed as well, and cracks and pores are interconnected. In the scanned image at 70000x, it can be seen that the surface is rough. The specific surface area changes from sample to sample, as it is related to the development of pores and cracks. This causes differences in the amount of adsorbed oxygen and strongly affects the early oxidation and the consequent coal spontaneous combustion. If there are more pores and cracks and a larger specific surface area, there are more opportunities for the contact of coal with oxygen, thus leading to early oxidation and heat release. Therefore, from the perspective of the influence of the porous microstructure on oxygen adsorption, the experimental coal samples investigated here show tendency to spontaneous combustion.


## 3. Experimental Study

### 3.1. Experimental Methods

#### 3.1.1. Experiments on Coal Cooling

These experiments were carried out with the aid of a self-made device system for program temperature rising (Figure4). The experimental apparatus includes air intake, heating, monitoring, gas collection and detection systems, and a coal sample tank (Figure 5). A constant flow of air is introduced. The air is provided by an air pump and pressed into a 1.5 m copper pipe for preheating, so that the air temperature is close to the ambient value. The temperature of the coal sample is measured by a thermocouple placed in the coal sample tank and connected to a temperature inspection instrument. The temperature of the coal sample is increased to 170°C at a constant heating rate (starting from 30°C). The air enters the coal sample tank. The coal sample reacts, and the generated gas is sent to a gas chromatograph for concentration analysis.Figure 4
Scheme of the experimental system [8].Figure 5
Details of the self-made coal sample tank.The height of the steel-made coal sample tank is 20 cm, and the bottom diameter is 8 cm. The upper and lower parts of the coal sample tank are equipped with glass fibers to reduce heat loss. After removing the oxide layer from the surface of the coal sample, the coal sample is crushed and divided into five particle sizes: 0–0.9, 0.9–3, 3–5, 5–7, and 7–10 mm. The mass of each coal sample is 1000 g. Before the test, each sample was vacuum-dried at 40°C for 12 hours to reduce the influence of moisture on coal heating and carbon dioxide cooling. Three thermocouples (1#, 2#, and 3# in Figure5) are located, respectively, at 15 cm, 10 cm, and 5 cm from the bottom of the coal sample tank, to measure the temperature distribution in space. Coal samples are loaded into the tank until the height of the sample exceeds the 1# measuring point. At the beginning of the test, the temperature detector is turned on and the 2# measuring point is used as reference. The coal sample is heated at a rate of 0.4°C/min. The air flow rate is maintained at 120 mL/min, to simulate natural coal oxidation. Air is pumped until the temperature of the coal body reaches 170°C. The temperature rise is then stopped, and the maximum temperature is maintained for 10 minutes. At the same time, the air intake system is closed to minimize heat loss. Subsequently, liquid CO2 is injected in the upper part of the coal sample tank (gas outlet zone) at injection pressure of 0.3 MPa and with mass flow rate of 0.15 g/s; it flows out through the gas inlet in the lower part of the coal sample tank. The temperature changes in time upon CO2 cooling are measured, until the temperature of the 3 measuring points is lower than the spontaneous combustion characteristic temperature of the samples; at this point, the cooling experiment ends [9].


#### 3.1.2. Experiments on the Influence of CO2 on Coal Spontaneous Combustion

The concentration of CO generated upon coal oxidation and the oxygen consumption rate for coal samples are here used as indicators in order to analyze the influence of different CO2 concentrations on the spontaneous combustion characteristics of coal [10]. The device for these experiments is the same as the one shown in Figures 4 and 5. Experiments have been designed to conduct tests on coal spontaneous combustion under different atmosphere conditions, to study the influence of CO2 on the critical temperature and on the dry cracking temperature of selected coal samples [11]. Five coal samples of different particle size, 200 g each, were mixed to form a 1000 g coal sample that was loaded into the tank. During the heating process, the heating rate was 0.3°C/min and the air supply flow rate was 120 mL/min. When the temperature of the coal sample increased by 10°C, gases were extracted for quantitative analysis. The initial temperature of the experiment was set at T = 30°C, and the maximum temperature during the experiment was limited to T = 170°C. The experimental conditions are shown in Table 1: experiment no. 1 was carried out in atmosphere simulating air composition, but experiments nos. 2, 3, and 4 under progressively increasing CO2 concentration (from 33.3 to 78.8% by volume), while O2 and N2 concentrations progressively decreased (O2 from 15% to 3%, balance N2).Table 1
Atmosphere composition for tests on the influence of CO2 concentration (% by volume).
ExperimentO2 (%)N2 (%)CO2 (%)12179021551.733.33930614318.278.8


#### 3.1.3. Experiments on the Gaseous CO2 Adsorption by Coal Samples

A coal sample with mass of 500 g and particle size of 60–80 mesh (0.18–0.25 mm) was selected, evenly placed in a tube furnace and sealed. Before the experiment, the coal sample was heated and degassed at a temperature of 25°C for 1 hour. After degassing, the tube furnace was evacuated to an absolute pressure of zero with a vacuum pump. At this time, gaseous CO2 was injected into the tube furnace until the pressures of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 MPa were reached, respectively, with temperatures of 30, 40, and 50°C, respectively. The pressure value in the tube furnace was recorded at regular intervals until the pressure no longer changed for all practical purposes. The change in pressure in the tube furnace indirectly reflects the CO2 adsorption by coal at different temperatures and pressures.The test rig is represented and illustrated in Figure6. A pressure reducing valve, a pressure stabilizing valve, and a control valve, namely 3, 7, and 10 valves in Figure 6, are sequentially connected between the high-pressure CO2 Dewar and the gas pipeline. The coal sample tube is made of quartz, being high-temperature resistant, compact, and visible, with two openings at both ends. The left and right ends can be sealed by flanges, sealing rings, sealing caps with holes, and valves. The gas buffer tank can stabilize the gas source and provide the required gas. The temperature adjustment range of the heating device is from room temperature to 1200°C. A thermocouple made of corundum is arranged in the heating device. The pressure sensor gas is arranged next to the gas buffer tank and the coal sample pipe and is connected to the computer for real-time monitoring.Figure 6
Scheme of the CO2 adsorption experimental device.


#### 3.1.4. Thermal Analysis Experiments

A HITACHI STA7200RV synchronous thermal analysis instrument was used. A 200-mesh (0.075 mm) coal sample was vacuum-dried at constant temperature of 40°C for 24 hours, and then 10 mg was selected for the experiment. The air flow rate in the instrument was 50 mL/min. After maintaining a constant temperature of 30°C and letting the system thermally stabilize, the temperature is increased at a heating rate of 10 K/min up to 900°C, and the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curve of the coal sample under four different atmosphere conditions (the same as those reported in Table1) is measured, to investigate the effect of CO2 on heat release and oxidation kinetics.


### 3.2. Experimental Results

#### 3.2.1. Experiments on Coal Cooling

For the low-temperature oxidation stage, the critical temperature and dry cracking temperature of coal are of great significance [12]. The critical temperature of coal refers to the first temperature at which the coal-oxygen recombination reaction is accelerated and the rate of oxygen consumption consequently increases. Dry cracking temperature refers to the second temperature at which coal-oxygen recombination accelerates. Figure 7 reports the distribution of the proportions of temperature drops, as measured by the three thermocouples indicated in Figure 5, for samples of different particle size and as a function of the stage of the process. We here define “first stage” as that from the beginning of the cooling process down to the maximum dry cracking temperature (130°C). The proportion changes from 15% to 18% (at decreasing particle size with little effect of this parameter) as measured by thermocouple 1#, from 8% to 13% (at decreasing particle size with moderate effect of this parameter) as measured by thermocouple 2#, and from 11% to 21% (at decreasing particle size with marked effect of this parameter) as measured by thermocouple 3#. Namely, both the role of particle size and the relevance of the percentage value increase when going from bottom to top (Figure 5). The “second stage” is that from the highest dry cracking temperature (130°C) down to the highest critical temperature (80°C). The cooling time in the second stage is the longest, and the proportion is larger at finer particle size for all the three temperature measuring ports. The “third stage” is that from the highest critical temperature down to the end of the experiment. It takes longer for measuring point 2# and is affected by particle size as the proportion is now larger for larger particle size [13].Figure 7
Distribution of proportions of temperature drops, as measured by thermocouples 1#, 2#, and 3# (Figure5), during cooling of coal samples with different particle sizes. The process is subdivided into three stages as described in the text [8].Explanation of these trends is that, as the particle size of the coal sample increases, the specific surface area decreases, and the coal-oxygen contact area is relatively reduced, thereby reducing the rate of coal-oxygen recombination reaction and gradually increasing the critical temperature (80°C) and dry cracking temperature (130°C) of the coal body. It is in fact observed that the most relevant stage is the third for coarser particles and the second for finer ones.


#### 3.2.2. Experiments on the Influence of CO2 on Coal Spontaneous Combustion

Figure8 shows the evolution of CO concentration as a function of coal particle temperature under the four different atmospheres listed in Table 1. CO concentration increases with particle temperature and decreases at increasing CO2 concentration (from the maximum value of about 8000 ppm when CO2 is absent, to about 3000 ppm when CO2 is present at an amount of 78.8% in the atmosphere). The differences among cases at different CO2 concentration are more and more significant after 110°C. The high concentration of CO2 can inhibit the reaction process between coal and O2, resulting in a decrease in the amount of oxidized gas (CO) produced.Figure 8
CO concentration as a function of coal temperature for experimental conditions 1–4 (Table1).It can be seen from Figure9 that the oxygen consumption rate of the coal sample increases with the coal temperature and with the increase of the oxygen concentration in the carrier gas during the oxidation heating process. The maximum value is of more than 3000 mol/(cm3 s) when O2 concentration is 21%, but less than 500 mol/(cm3 s) when O2 concentration is 3% only (positive effect of the presence of CO2). As a matter of fact, due to the different adsorption capacity of coal with respect to different gaseous species, the adhesion capacity of CO2 on the surface of coal molecules is much higher than that of other gases. During coal oxidation [14], the coal particle adsorbs CO2 faster than O2. This is because the surface of coal has a large number of different functional groups, and the ether and carbonyl groups can easily provide electrons to CO2 to form a complex, which is widely distributed in the pores of the coal. In addition, the increase in CO2 concentration also inhibits the redox reaction of aromatic hydrocarbons in coal molecules, resulting in more aromatic functional groups being better retained [15]. Moreover, CO2 inhibits the oxidation activity of more active functional groups in coal molecules, resulting in increasing the apparent activation energy of coal molecular reactions [16]. In other words, CO2 can be better adsorbed in coal particle pores, occupying the pores that should have adsorbed oxygen. This leads to the slowing down of the reaction between coal and oxygen.Figure 9
Oxygen consumption rate as a function of coal temperature for experimental conditions 1–4 (Table1).


#### 3.2.3. Experiments on the Gaseous CO2 Adsorption by Coal Samples

Effect of temperature. Figure 10 illustrates the time-pressure drop trends in the tube furnace as a function of temperature, for three subcases where the CO2 pressure has been fixed. The adsorption of CO2 by coal is an exothermic dynamic equilibrium process. Increasing the adsorption temperature causes the adsorption equilibrium to move in the (unwanted) direction of desorption. Therefore, at increasing T, the CO2 adsorption capacity of the test coal sample gradually decreases, the pressure drop in the tube furnace decreases, and the adsorption saturation state is reached earlier. In addition, there is a time effect on gas adsorption. An increase in T can increase the activity of adsorbed gas molecules and reduce the time the adsorbed gas stays on the surface of coal pores, thereby reducing the amount of adsorption. Furthermore, the higher the CO2 pressure is, the earlier the adsorption saturation is reached. The occurrence of adsorption was mainly concentrated before 10 h, and the pressure drop changed little in the later period of the test. At the same time, the pressure drop in the tube furnace tends to rise after 24 h, as at long times the sample begins to desorb CO2 due to little increases in T, but this is a very minor effect as it can be seen in Figure 10.Figure 10
Pressure drop in the tube furnace vs. time at temperature varying from 30°C to 50°C at CO2 pressure of (a) 0.3 MPa, (b) 0.4 MPa, and (c) 0.5 MPa upon CO2 adsorption.
(a)(b)(c)Effect of CO2pressure. Figure 11 illustrates the time-pressure drop trends in the tube furnace as a function of CO2 pressure, for three subcases where the temperature has been fixed. At a given value of T, as the pressure of CO2 increases, the pressure drop in the tube furnace changes more significantly, as the number of adsorbate molecules entering the coal pores increases, and the probability of contact with the coal surface increases as well. When the amount of adsorbed gas is higher, a decrease of the pressure drop in the tube furnace is observed. Recalling the concept of mean free path, at fixed T, higher pressure can cause shorter mean free path and less marked irregular thermal motion for gaseous molecules, and gradual increase of gas adsorption by coal. In addition, at fixed T, the higher the CO2 pressure is, the earlier the saturation state of adsorption is reached (i.e., higher pressure promotes adsorption). On the other hand, at fixed CO2 pressure, higher temperature inhibits the process as already discussed.Figure 11
Pressure drop in the tube furnace vs. time at CO2 pressure varying from 0.3 to 0.5 MPa at nominal temperature of (a) 30°C, (b) 40°C, and (c) 50°C upon CO2 adsorption.
(a)(b)(c)


#### 3.2.4. Thermal Analysis Experiments

DSC can be used to study the physical and chemical changes of coal during heating and oxidation. The area subtended to the DSC endothermal or exothermal peak is proportional to the change in enthalpy. Therefore, DSC can be used to quantitatively evaluate the heat change.Figure12 illustrates the DSC results obtained under the four different atmosphere conditions listed in Table 1. Table 2 shows the peak temperature and maximum DSC value under experimental conditions 1–4 listed in Table 1. The lower the CO2 concentration, the steeper the DSC curve and the higher the peak value: this indicates a more intense exothermic oxidation reaction when the CO2 concentration is lower. On the other hand, the presence of CO2 progressively suppresses coal oxidation. Because coal has a relatively good capacity to adsorb CO2, it is easy for CO2 to cover the surface of the coal particle to form a protective film against O2, thus reducing the oxidation rate. In addition, the formation of the protective film inhibits heat release. The coal sample and the surrounding environment need to reach a high temperature to melt the protective film. As the concentration of CO2 increases, the apparent activation energy of coal oxidation increases as well. This is because the actual oxidation rate will be reduced due to the addition of CO2, and the coal oxidation exothermal peak will be accordingly reduced.Figure 12
DSC results for coal oxidation under experimental conditions 1–4 (Table1).Table 2
Peak temperature and maximum DSC value under experimental conditions 1–4 (Table1).
Peak temperature (°C)Maximum DSC value (W/g)1460.14812.0252461.67312.0043467.53311.6634471.87411.471


## 3.1. Experimental Methods

### 3.1.1. Experiments on Coal Cooling

These experiments were carried out with the aid of a self-made device system for program temperature rising (Figure4). The experimental apparatus includes air intake, heating, monitoring, gas collection and detection systems, and a coal sample tank (Figure 5). A constant flow of air is introduced. The air is provided by an air pump and pressed into a 1.5 m copper pipe for preheating, so that the air temperature is close to the ambient value. The temperature of the coal sample is measured by a thermocouple placed in the coal sample tank and connected to a temperature inspection instrument. The temperature of the coal sample is increased to 170°C at a constant heating rate (starting from 30°C). The air enters the coal sample tank. The coal sample reacts, and the generated gas is sent to a gas chromatograph for concentration analysis.Figure 4
Scheme of the experimental system [8].Figure 5
Details of the self-made coal sample tank.The height of the steel-made coal sample tank is 20 cm, and the bottom diameter is 8 cm. The upper and lower parts of the coal sample tank are equipped with glass fibers to reduce heat loss. After removing the oxide layer from the surface of the coal sample, the coal sample is crushed and divided into five particle sizes: 0–0.9, 0.9–3, 3–5, 5–7, and 7–10 mm. The mass of each coal sample is 1000 g. Before the test, each sample was vacuum-dried at 40°C for 12 hours to reduce the influence of moisture on coal heating and carbon dioxide cooling. Three thermocouples (1#, 2#, and 3# in Figure5) are located, respectively, at 15 cm, 10 cm, and 5 cm from the bottom of the coal sample tank, to measure the temperature distribution in space. Coal samples are loaded into the tank until the height of the sample exceeds the 1# measuring point. At the beginning of the test, the temperature detector is turned on and the 2# measuring point is used as reference. The coal sample is heated at a rate of 0.4°C/min. The air flow rate is maintained at 120 mL/min, to simulate natural coal oxidation. Air is pumped until the temperature of the coal body reaches 170°C. The temperature rise is then stopped, and the maximum temperature is maintained for 10 minutes. At the same time, the air intake system is closed to minimize heat loss. Subsequently, liquid CO2 is injected in the upper part of the coal sample tank (gas outlet zone) at injection pressure of 0.3 MPa and with mass flow rate of 0.15 g/s; it flows out through the gas inlet in the lower part of the coal sample tank. The temperature changes in time upon CO2 cooling are measured, until the temperature of the 3 measuring points is lower than the spontaneous combustion characteristic temperature of the samples; at this point, the cooling experiment ends [9].


### 3.1.2. Experiments on the Influence of CO2 on Coal Spontaneous Combustion

The concentration of CO generated upon coal oxidation and the oxygen consumption rate for coal samples are here used as indicators in order to analyze the influence of different CO2 concentrations on the spontaneous combustion characteristics of coal [10]. The device for these experiments is the same as the one shown in Figures 4 and 5. Experiments have been designed to conduct tests on coal spontaneous combustion under different atmosphere conditions, to study the influence of CO2 on the critical temperature and on the dry cracking temperature of selected coal samples [11]. Five coal samples of different particle size, 200 g each, were mixed to form a 1000 g coal sample that was loaded into the tank. During the heating process, the heating rate was 0.3°C/min and the air supply flow rate was 120 mL/min. When the temperature of the coal sample increased by 10°C, gases were extracted for quantitative analysis. The initial temperature of the experiment was set at T = 30°C, and the maximum temperature during the experiment was limited to T = 170°C. The experimental conditions are shown in Table 1: experiment no. 1 was carried out in atmosphere simulating air composition, but experiments nos. 2, 3, and 4 under progressively increasing CO2 concentration (from 33.3 to 78.8% by volume), while O2 and N2 concentrations progressively decreased (O2 from 15% to 3%, balance N2).Table 1
Atmosphere composition for tests on the influence of CO2 concentration (% by volume).
ExperimentO2 (%)N2 (%)CO2 (%)12179021551.733.33930614318.278.8


### 3.1.3. Experiments on the Gaseous CO2 Adsorption by Coal Samples

A coal sample with mass of 500 g and particle size of 60–80 mesh (0.18–0.25 mm) was selected, evenly placed in a tube furnace and sealed. Before the experiment, the coal sample was heated and degassed at a temperature of 25°C for 1 hour. After degassing, the tube furnace was evacuated to an absolute pressure of zero with a vacuum pump. At this time, gaseous CO2 was injected into the tube furnace until the pressures of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 MPa were reached, respectively, with temperatures of 30, 40, and 50°C, respectively. The pressure value in the tube furnace was recorded at regular intervals until the pressure no longer changed for all practical purposes. The change in pressure in the tube furnace indirectly reflects the CO2 adsorption by coal at different temperatures and pressures.The test rig is represented and illustrated in Figure6. A pressure reducing valve, a pressure stabilizing valve, and a control valve, namely 3, 7, and 10 valves in Figure 6, are sequentially connected between the high-pressure CO2 Dewar and the gas pipeline. The coal sample tube is made of quartz, being high-temperature resistant, compact, and visible, with two openings at both ends. The left and right ends can be sealed by flanges, sealing rings, sealing caps with holes, and valves. The gas buffer tank can stabilize the gas source and provide the required gas. The temperature adjustment range of the heating device is from room temperature to 1200°C. A thermocouple made of corundum is arranged in the heating device. The pressure sensor gas is arranged next to the gas buffer tank and the coal sample pipe and is connected to the computer for real-time monitoring.Figure 6
Scheme of the CO2 adsorption experimental device.


### 3.1.4. Thermal Analysis Experiments

A HITACHI STA7200RV synchronous thermal analysis instrument was used. A 200-mesh (0.075 mm) coal sample was vacuum-dried at constant temperature of 40°C for 24 hours, and then 10 mg was selected for the experiment. The air flow rate in the instrument was 50 mL/min. After maintaining a constant temperature of 30°C and letting the system thermally stabilize, the temperature is increased at a heating rate of 10 K/min up to 900°C, and the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curve of the coal sample under four different atmosphere conditions (the same as those reported in Table1) is measured, to investigate the effect of CO2 on heat release and oxidation kinetics.


## 3.1.1. Experiments on Coal Cooling

These experiments were carried out with the aid of a self-made device system for program temperature rising (Figure4). The experimental apparatus includes air intake, heating, monitoring, gas collection and detection systems, and a coal sample tank (Figure 5). A constant flow of air is introduced. The air is provided by an air pump and pressed into a 1.5 m copper pipe for preheating, so that the air temperature is close to the ambient value. The temperature of the coal sample is measured by a thermocouple placed in the coal sample tank and connected to a temperature inspection instrument. The temperature of the coal sample is increased to 170°C at a constant heating rate (starting from 30°C). The air enters the coal sample tank. The coal sample reacts, and the generated gas is sent to a gas chromatograph for concentration analysis.Figure 4
Scheme of the experimental system [8].Figure 5
Details of the self-made coal sample tank.The height of the steel-made coal sample tank is 20 cm, and the bottom diameter is 8 cm. The upper and lower parts of the coal sample tank are equipped with glass fibers to reduce heat loss. After removing the oxide layer from the surface of the coal sample, the coal sample is crushed and divided into five particle sizes: 0–0.9, 0.9–3, 3–5, 5–7, and 7–10 mm. The mass of each coal sample is 1000 g. Before the test, each sample was vacuum-dried at 40°C for 12 hours to reduce the influence of moisture on coal heating and carbon dioxide cooling. Three thermocouples (1#, 2#, and 3# in Figure5) are located, respectively, at 15 cm, 10 cm, and 5 cm from the bottom of the coal sample tank, to measure the temperature distribution in space. Coal samples are loaded into the tank until the height of the sample exceeds the 1# measuring point. At the beginning of the test, the temperature detector is turned on and the 2# measuring point is used as reference. The coal sample is heated at a rate of 0.4°C/min. The air flow rate is maintained at 120 mL/min, to simulate natural coal oxidation. Air is pumped until the temperature of the coal body reaches 170°C. The temperature rise is then stopped, and the maximum temperature is maintained for 10 minutes. At the same time, the air intake system is closed to minimize heat loss. Subsequently, liquid CO2 is injected in the upper part of the coal sample tank (gas outlet zone) at injection pressure of 0.3 MPa and with mass flow rate of 0.15 g/s; it flows out through the gas inlet in the lower part of the coal sample tank. The temperature changes in time upon CO2 cooling are measured, until the temperature of the 3 measuring points is lower than the spontaneous combustion characteristic temperature of the samples; at this point, the cooling experiment ends [9].


## 3.1.2. Experiments on the Influence of CO2 on Coal Spontaneous Combustion

The concentration of CO generated upon coal oxidation and the oxygen consumption rate for coal samples are here used as indicators in order to analyze the influence of different CO2 concentrations on the spontaneous combustion characteristics of coal [10]. The device for these experiments is the same as the one shown in Figures 4 and 5. Experiments have been designed to conduct tests on coal spontaneous combustion under different atmosphere conditions, to study the influence of CO2 on the critical temperature and on the dry cracking temperature of selected coal samples [11]. Five coal samples of different particle size, 200 g each, were mixed to form a 1000 g coal sample that was loaded into the tank. During the heating process, the heating rate was 0.3°C/min and the air supply flow rate was 120 mL/min. When the temperature of the coal sample increased by 10°C, gases were extracted for quantitative analysis. The initial temperature of the experiment was set at T = 30°C, and the maximum temperature during the experiment was limited to T = 170°C. The experimental conditions are shown in Table 1: experiment no. 1 was carried out in atmosphere simulating air composition, but experiments nos. 2, 3, and 4 under progressively increasing CO2 concentration (from 33.3 to 78.8% by volume), while O2 and N2 concentrations progressively decreased (O2 from 15% to 3%, balance N2).Table 1
Atmosphere composition for tests on the influence of CO2 concentration (% by volume).
ExperimentO2 (%)N2 (%)CO2 (%)12179021551.733.33930614318.278.8


## 3.1.3. Experiments on the Gaseous CO2 Adsorption by Coal Samples

A coal sample with mass of 500 g and particle size of 60–80 mesh (0.18–0.25 mm) was selected, evenly placed in a tube furnace and sealed. Before the experiment, the coal sample was heated and degassed at a temperature of 25°C for 1 hour. After degassing, the tube furnace was evacuated to an absolute pressure of zero with a vacuum pump. At this time, gaseous CO2 was injected into the tube furnace until the pressures of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 MPa were reached, respectively, with temperatures of 30, 40, and 50°C, respectively. The pressure value in the tube furnace was recorded at regular intervals until the pressure no longer changed for all practical purposes. The change in pressure in the tube furnace indirectly reflects the CO2 adsorption by coal at different temperatures and pressures.The test rig is represented and illustrated in Figure6. A pressure reducing valve, a pressure stabilizing valve, and a control valve, namely 3, 7, and 10 valves in Figure 6, are sequentially connected between the high-pressure CO2 Dewar and the gas pipeline. The coal sample tube is made of quartz, being high-temperature resistant, compact, and visible, with two openings at both ends. The left and right ends can be sealed by flanges, sealing rings, sealing caps with holes, and valves. The gas buffer tank can stabilize the gas source and provide the required gas. The temperature adjustment range of the heating device is from room temperature to 1200°C. A thermocouple made of corundum is arranged in the heating device. The pressure sensor gas is arranged next to the gas buffer tank and the coal sample pipe and is connected to the computer for real-time monitoring.Figure 6
Scheme of the CO2 adsorption experimental device.


## 3.1.4. Thermal Analysis Experiments

A HITACHI STA7200RV synchronous thermal analysis instrument was used. A 200-mesh (0.075 mm) coal sample was vacuum-dried at constant temperature of 40°C for 24 hours, and then 10 mg was selected for the experiment. The air flow rate in the instrument was 50 mL/min. After maintaining a constant temperature of 30°C and letting the system thermally stabilize, the temperature is increased at a heating rate of 10 K/min up to 900°C, and the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curve of the coal sample under four different atmosphere conditions (the same as those reported in Table1) is measured, to investigate the effect of CO2 on heat release and oxidation kinetics.


## 3.2. Experimental Results

### 3.2.1. Experiments on Coal Cooling

For the low-temperature oxidation stage, the critical temperature and dry cracking temperature of coal are of great significance [12]. The critical temperature of coal refers to the first temperature at which the coal-oxygen recombination reaction is accelerated and the rate of oxygen consumption consequently increases. Dry cracking temperature refers to the second temperature at which coal-oxygen recombination accelerates. Figure 7 reports the distribution of the proportions of temperature drops, as measured by the three thermocouples indicated in Figure 5, for samples of different particle size and as a function of the stage of the process. We here define “first stage” as that from the beginning of the cooling process down to the maximum dry cracking temperature (130°C). The proportion changes from 15% to 18% (at decreasing particle size with little effect of this parameter) as measured by thermocouple 1#, from 8% to 13% (at decreasing particle size with moderate effect of this parameter) as measured by thermocouple 2#, and from 11% to 21% (at decreasing particle size with marked effect of this parameter) as measured by thermocouple 3#. Namely, both the role of particle size and the relevance of the percentage value increase when going from bottom to top (Figure 5). The “second stage” is that from the highest dry cracking temperature (130°C) down to the highest critical temperature (80°C). The cooling time in the second stage is the longest, and the proportion is larger at finer particle size for all the three temperature measuring ports. The “third stage” is that from the highest critical temperature down to the end of the experiment. It takes longer for measuring point 2# and is affected by particle size as the proportion is now larger for larger particle size [13].Figure 7
Distribution of proportions of temperature drops, as measured by thermocouples 1#, 2#, and 3# (Figure5), during cooling of coal samples with different particle sizes. The process is subdivided into three stages as described in the text [8].Explanation of these trends is that, as the particle size of the coal sample increases, the specific surface area decreases, and the coal-oxygen contact area is relatively reduced, thereby reducing the rate of coal-oxygen recombination reaction and gradually increasing the critical temperature (80°C) and dry cracking temperature (130°C) of the coal body. It is in fact observed that the most relevant stage is the third for coarser particles and the second for finer ones.


### 3.2.2. Experiments on the Influence of CO2 on Coal Spontaneous Combustion

Figure8 shows the evolution of CO concentration as a function of coal particle temperature under the four different atmospheres listed in Table 1. CO concentration increases with particle temperature and decreases at increasing CO2 concentration (from the maximum value of about 8000 ppm when CO2 is absent, to about 3000 ppm when CO2 is present at an amount of 78.8% in the atmosphere). The differences among cases at different CO2 concentration are more and more significant after 110°C. The high concentration of CO2 can inhibit the reaction process between coal and O2, resulting in a decrease in the amount of oxidized gas (CO) produced.Figure 8
CO concentration as a function of coal temperature for experimental conditions 1–4 (Table1).It can be seen from Figure9 that the oxygen consumption rate of the coal sample increases with the coal temperature and with the increase of the oxygen concentration in the carrier gas during the oxidation heating process. The maximum value is of more than 3000 mol/(cm3 s) when O2 concentration is 21%, but less than 500 mol/(cm3 s) when O2 concentration is 3% only (positive effect of the presence of CO2). As a matter of fact, due to the different adsorption capacity of coal with respect to different gaseous species, the adhesion capacity of CO2 on the surface of coal molecules is much higher than that of other gases. During coal oxidation [14], the coal particle adsorbs CO2 faster than O2. This is because the surface of coal has a large number of different functional groups, and the ether and carbonyl groups can easily provide electrons to CO2 to form a complex, which is widely distributed in the pores of the coal. In addition, the increase in CO2 concentration also inhibits the redox reaction of aromatic hydrocarbons in coal molecules, resulting in more aromatic functional groups being better retained [15]. Moreover, CO2 inhibits the oxidation activity of more active functional groups in coal molecules, resulting in increasing the apparent activation energy of coal molecular reactions [16]. In other words, CO2 can be better adsorbed in coal particle pores, occupying the pores that should have adsorbed oxygen. This leads to the slowing down of the reaction between coal and oxygen.Figure 9
Oxygen consumption rate as a function of coal temperature for experimental conditions 1–4 (Table1).


### 3.2.3. Experiments on the Gaseous CO2 Adsorption by Coal Samples

Effect of temperature. Figure 10 illustrates the time-pressure drop trends in the tube furnace as a function of temperature, for three subcases where the CO2 pressure has been fixed. The adsorption of CO2 by coal is an exothermic dynamic equilibrium process. Increasing the adsorption temperature causes the adsorption equilibrium to move in the (unwanted) direction of desorption. Therefore, at increasing T, the CO2 adsorption capacity of the test coal sample gradually decreases, the pressure drop in the tube furnace decreases, and the adsorption saturation state is reached earlier. In addition, there is a time effect on gas adsorption. An increase in T can increase the activity of adsorbed gas molecules and reduce the time the adsorbed gas stays on the surface of coal pores, thereby reducing the amount of adsorption. Furthermore, the higher the CO2 pressure is, the earlier the adsorption saturation is reached. The occurrence of adsorption was mainly concentrated before 10 h, and the pressure drop changed little in the later period of the test. At the same time, the pressure drop in the tube furnace tends to rise after 24 h, as at long times the sample begins to desorb CO2 due to little increases in T, but this is a very minor effect as it can be seen in Figure 10.Figure 10
Pressure drop in the tube furnace vs. time at temperature varying from 30°C to 50°C at CO2 pressure of (a) 0.3 MPa, (b) 0.4 MPa, and (c) 0.5 MPa upon CO2 adsorption.
(a)(b)(c)Effect of CO2pressure. Figure 11 illustrates the time-pressure drop trends in the tube furnace as a function of CO2 pressure, for three subcases where the temperature has been fixed. At a given value of T, as the pressure of CO2 increases, the pressure drop in the tube furnace changes more significantly, as the number of adsorbate molecules entering the coal pores increases, and the probability of contact with the coal surface increases as well. When the amount of adsorbed gas is higher, a decrease of the pressure drop in the tube furnace is observed. Recalling the concept of mean free path, at fixed T, higher pressure can cause shorter mean free path and less marked irregular thermal motion for gaseous molecules, and gradual increase of gas adsorption by coal. In addition, at fixed T, the higher the CO2 pressure is, the earlier the saturation state of adsorption is reached (i.e., higher pressure promotes adsorption). On the other hand, at fixed CO2 pressure, higher temperature inhibits the process as already discussed.Figure 11
Pressure drop in the tube furnace vs. time at CO2 pressure varying from 0.3 to 0.5 MPa at nominal temperature of (a) 30°C, (b) 40°C, and (c) 50°C upon CO2 adsorption.
(a)(b)(c)


### 3.2.4. Thermal Analysis Experiments

DSC can be used to study the physical and chemical changes of coal during heating and oxidation. The area subtended to the DSC endothermal or exothermal peak is proportional to the change in enthalpy. Therefore, DSC can be used to quantitatively evaluate the heat change.Figure12 illustrates the DSC results obtained under the four different atmosphere conditions listed in Table 1. Table 2 shows the peak temperature and maximum DSC value under experimental conditions 1–4 listed in Table 1. The lower the CO2 concentration, the steeper the DSC curve and the higher the peak value: this indicates a more intense exothermic oxidation reaction when the CO2 concentration is lower. On the other hand, the presence of CO2 progressively suppresses coal oxidation. Because coal has a relatively good capacity to adsorb CO2, it is easy for CO2 to cover the surface of the coal particle to form a protective film against O2, thus reducing the oxidation rate. In addition, the formation of the protective film inhibits heat release. The coal sample and the surrounding environment need to reach a high temperature to melt the protective film. As the concentration of CO2 increases, the apparent activation energy of coal oxidation increases as well. This is because the actual oxidation rate will be reduced due to the addition of CO2, and the coal oxidation exothermal peak will be accordingly reduced.Figure 12
DSC results for coal oxidation under experimental conditions 1–4 (Table1).Table 2
Peak temperature and maximum DSC value under experimental conditions 1–4 (Table1).
Peak temperature (°C)Maximum DSC value (W/g)1460.14812.0252461.67312.0043467.53311.6634471.87411.471


## 3.2.1. Experiments on Coal Cooling

For the low-temperature oxidation stage, the critical temperature and dry cracking temperature of coal are of great significance [12]. The critical temperature of coal refers to the first temperature at which the coal-oxygen recombination reaction is accelerated and the rate of oxygen consumption consequently increases. Dry cracking temperature refers to the second temperature at which coal-oxygen recombination accelerates. Figure 7 reports the distribution of the proportions of temperature drops, as measured by the three thermocouples indicated in Figure 5, for samples of different particle size and as a function of the stage of the process. We here define “first stage” as that from the beginning of the cooling process down to the maximum dry cracking temperature (130°C). The proportion changes from 15% to 18% (at decreasing particle size with little effect of this parameter) as measured by thermocouple 1#, from 8% to 13% (at decreasing particle size with moderate effect of this parameter) as measured by thermocouple 2#, and from 11% to 21% (at decreasing particle size with marked effect of this parameter) as measured by thermocouple 3#. Namely, both the role of particle size and the relevance of the percentage value increase when going from bottom to top (Figure 5). The “second stage” is that from the highest dry cracking temperature (130°C) down to the highest critical temperature (80°C). The cooling time in the second stage is the longest, and the proportion is larger at finer particle size for all the three temperature measuring ports. The “third stage” is that from the highest critical temperature down to the end of the experiment. It takes longer for measuring point 2# and is affected by particle size as the proportion is now larger for larger particle size [13].Figure 7
Distribution of proportions of temperature drops, as measured by thermocouples 1#, 2#, and 3# (Figure5), during cooling of coal samples with different particle sizes. The process is subdivided into three stages as described in the text [8].Explanation of these trends is that, as the particle size of the coal sample increases, the specific surface area decreases, and the coal-oxygen contact area is relatively reduced, thereby reducing the rate of coal-oxygen recombination reaction and gradually increasing the critical temperature (80°C) and dry cracking temperature (130°C) of the coal body. It is in fact observed that the most relevant stage is the third for coarser particles and the second for finer ones.


## 3.2.2. Experiments on the Influence of CO2 on Coal Spontaneous Combustion

Figure8 shows the evolution of CO concentration as a function of coal particle temperature under the four different atmospheres listed in Table 1. CO concentration increases with particle temperature and decreases at increasing CO2 concentration (from the maximum value of about 8000 ppm when CO2 is absent, to about 3000 ppm when CO2 is present at an amount of 78.8% in the atmosphere). The differences among cases at different CO2 concentration are more and more significant after 110°C. The high concentration of CO2 can inhibit the reaction process between coal and O2, resulting in a decrease in the amount of oxidized gas (CO) produced.Figure 8
CO concentration as a function of coal temperature for experimental conditions 1–4 (Table1).It can be seen from Figure9 that the oxygen consumption rate of the coal sample increases with the coal temperature and with the increase of the oxygen concentration in the carrier gas during the oxidation heating process. The maximum value is of more than 3000 mol/(cm3 s) when O2 concentration is 21%, but less than 500 mol/(cm3 s) when O2 concentration is 3% only (positive effect of the presence of CO2). As a matter of fact, due to the different adsorption capacity of coal with respect to different gaseous species, the adhesion capacity of CO2 on the surface of coal molecules is much higher than that of other gases. During coal oxidation [14], the coal particle adsorbs CO2 faster than O2. This is because the surface of coal has a large number of different functional groups, and the ether and carbonyl groups can easily provide electrons to CO2 to form a complex, which is widely distributed in the pores of the coal. In addition, the increase in CO2 concentration also inhibits the redox reaction of aromatic hydrocarbons in coal molecules, resulting in more aromatic functional groups being better retained [15]. Moreover, CO2 inhibits the oxidation activity of more active functional groups in coal molecules, resulting in increasing the apparent activation energy of coal molecular reactions [16]. In other words, CO2 can be better adsorbed in coal particle pores, occupying the pores that should have adsorbed oxygen. This leads to the slowing down of the reaction between coal and oxygen.Figure 9
Oxygen consumption rate as a function of coal temperature for experimental conditions 1–4 (Table1).


## 3.2.3. Experiments on the Gaseous CO2 Adsorption by Coal Samples

Effect of temperature. Figure 10 illustrates the time-pressure drop trends in the tube furnace as a function of temperature, for three subcases where the CO2 pressure has been fixed. The adsorption of CO2 by coal is an exothermic dynamic equilibrium process. Increasing the adsorption temperature causes the adsorption equilibrium to move in the (unwanted) direction of desorption. Therefore, at increasing T, the CO2 adsorption capacity of the test coal sample gradually decreases, the pressure drop in the tube furnace decreases, and the adsorption saturation state is reached earlier. In addition, there is a time effect on gas adsorption. An increase in T can increase the activity of adsorbed gas molecules and reduce the time the adsorbed gas stays on the surface of coal pores, thereby reducing the amount of adsorption. Furthermore, the higher the CO2 pressure is, the earlier the adsorption saturation is reached. The occurrence of adsorption was mainly concentrated before 10 h, and the pressure drop changed little in the later period of the test. At the same time, the pressure drop in the tube furnace tends to rise after 24 h, as at long times the sample begins to desorb CO2 due to little increases in T, but this is a very minor effect as it can be seen in Figure 10.Figure 10
Pressure drop in the tube furnace vs. time at temperature varying from 30°C to 50°C at CO2 pressure of (a) 0.3 MPa, (b) 0.4 MPa, and (c) 0.5 MPa upon CO2 adsorption.
(a)(b)(c)Effect of CO2pressure. Figure 11 illustrates the time-pressure drop trends in the tube furnace as a function of CO2 pressure, for three subcases where the temperature has been fixed. At a given value of T, as the pressure of CO2 increases, the pressure drop in the tube furnace changes more significantly, as the number of adsorbate molecules entering the coal pores increases, and the probability of contact with the coal surface increases as well. When the amount of adsorbed gas is higher, a decrease of the pressure drop in the tube furnace is observed. Recalling the concept of mean free path, at fixed T, higher pressure can cause shorter mean free path and less marked irregular thermal motion for gaseous molecules, and gradual increase of gas adsorption by coal. In addition, at fixed T, the higher the CO2 pressure is, the earlier the saturation state of adsorption is reached (i.e., higher pressure promotes adsorption). On the other hand, at fixed CO2 pressure, higher temperature inhibits the process as already discussed.Figure 11
Pressure drop in the tube furnace vs. time at CO2 pressure varying from 0.3 to 0.5 MPa at nominal temperature of (a) 30°C, (b) 40°C, and (c) 50°C upon CO2 adsorption.
(a)(b)(c)


## 3.2.4. Thermal Analysis Experiments

DSC can be used to study the physical and chemical changes of coal during heating and oxidation. The area subtended to the DSC endothermal or exothermal peak is proportional to the change in enthalpy. Therefore, DSC can be used to quantitatively evaluate the heat change.Figure12 illustrates the DSC results obtained under the four different atmosphere conditions listed in Table 1. Table 2 shows the peak temperature and maximum DSC value under experimental conditions 1–4 listed in Table 1. The lower the CO2 concentration, the steeper the DSC curve and the higher the peak value: this indicates a more intense exothermic oxidation reaction when the CO2 concentration is lower. On the other hand, the presence of CO2 progressively suppresses coal oxidation. Because coal has a relatively good capacity to adsorb CO2, it is easy for CO2 to cover the surface of the coal particle to form a protective film against O2, thus reducing the oxidation rate. In addition, the formation of the protective film inhibits heat release. The coal sample and the surrounding environment need to reach a high temperature to melt the protective film. As the concentration of CO2 increases, the apparent activation energy of coal oxidation increases as well. This is because the actual oxidation rate will be reduced due to the addition of CO2, and the coal oxidation exothermal peak will be accordingly reduced.Figure 12
DSC results for coal oxidation under experimental conditions 1–4 (Table1).Table 2
Peak temperature and maximum DSC value under experimental conditions 1–4 (Table1).
Peak temperature (°C)Maximum DSC value (W/g)1460.14812.0252461.67312.0043467.53311.6634471.87411.471


## 4. Numerical Simulation Analysis

The reference model is geometrically depicted in Figure13. The basic model parameters are listed in Table 3. The lower end of the intersection line between the working face and the goaf area and the side wall of the air intake lane is the origin of the coordinate system for establishing the geometric model in Figure 13. The length of the working face is along the x axis, and the depth of the goaf is along the y axis. The height of the goaf is along the z axis [17]. Table 4 illustrates values of properties of model materials, and Table 5 shows the boundary control conditions.Figure 13
Geometric description of the model.Table 3
Basic model parameters.
Model parametersParameter values1Working faceLength 306 m × width 5 m × height 5.6 m2Intake airwayLength 20 m × width 5.5 m × height 4 m3Return airwayLength 20 m × width 5 m × height 4 m4GoafLength 300 m × width 306 m × height 15 m5Mean inclination1–3°6Pipe diameter60 cm7Depth of buried pipes80 m, 100 m, and 120 mTable 4
Values of density, specific heat, and thermal conductivity for model materials.
Density (kg/m)Specific heat (J/(kg·K))Thermal conductivity (m2/s)Coal body135012500.15Rock mass165016500.2CO21.788401.45 × 10−7O21.439202.5 × 10−6N21.13810400.0242Table 5
Boundary control conditions of the model.
TypeNumerical valueTemperatureHydraulic diameterTurbulence intensityVentilation inletInlet velocity0.2, 0.5, 0.8, 1.0 m/s300 K4.53 m15%Ventilation outletFree overflow0.85———CO2 inletInlet mass flow9, 18, 27 t/h233 K0.6 m10%ANSYS Fluent 15 fluid dynamics software is utilized to simulate the seepage and gas concentration fields in the goaf, to examine the CO2 and O2 concentration fields before and after the injection of CO2 in the goaf, and to investigate the characteristic parameters of inerting and cooling, in order to determine the degree of influence of CO2 deposition. Through model establishment, grid division and parameter setting, numerical calculation, result processing, and other steps, the impact of key injection parameters on the diffusion of CO2 in the goaf during CO2 injection is analyzed. Taking liquid carbon dioxide injection for 2 hours as an example, the diffusion characteristics of CO2 in the goaf are analyzed in the case of different buried depths of release ports and CO2 injection flow rates.The transient solver embedded in Fluent simulation software is used to calculate the cooling and diffusion characteristics of CO2 in the goaf. Model results are illustrated in Figure 14. It can be seen that, after the CO2 is released from the release port in the goaf, it rapidly diffuses around under the action of pressure or concentration gradient. As the injection time increases from 2 to 6 h, the CO2 diffusion area in the goaf gradually expands. Due to the dilution effect of the fresh air flow on the inlet side, the diffusion of the concentration of CO2 in the goaf is uneven. At 2 h, the diffusion volume with a volume fraction of CO2 greater than 10% reaches 1284.7 m3. At 6 h, this value increases to 4154.4 m3. This confirms that CO2 diffuses very quickly in the goaf and can have a very good inerting effect [18].Figure 14
CO2 distribution characteristics during 6-hour injection. (a) Three-dimensional simulation of carbon dioxide diffusion. (b) Plane simulation diagram of carbon dioxide diffusion.
(a)(b)


## 5. Process of Surface Liquid CO2 Direct Injection

The schematic diagram of the process proposed here is shown in Figure15. The system mainly consists of electric regulating valve, liquid CO2 storage tank truck, booster device, flow control valve, instrumentation, DN50 stainless steel liquid CO2 transmission pipeline, intrinsically safe mine monitoring substation, integrated control terminal, and optical cable for mine communication.Figure 15
Schematic diagram of the proposed process for surface liquid CO2 direct injection.Metal hoses are utilized to connect the gas phase and liquid phase of the liquid CO2 tanker with the two inlets of the ground three-way gate valve [19]. The outlet of the three-way gate valve is connected to the inlet of the ground electric regulating valve through a short delivery pipe. The inlet of the ground electric regulating valve is connected to the inlet of the long-distance conveying pipeline. The long-distance transmission pipeline is laid along the surface, drilled on the ground to the underground roadway, and laid along the roadway floor to the underground area to be injected. The outlet of the long-distance transmission pipeline is connected with the inlet of the underground electric regulating valve, and the metal hose is connected with the outlet of the underground electric regulating valve as the output end of the liquid CO2 system. Pipeline pressure sensors, temperature sensors, and ultrasonic flow sensors are, respectively, installed at the input and output ends of the long-distance transportation pipeline. Carbon dioxide sensors are arranged along the long-distance transportation pipeline. The number of installations is determined according to the actual situation. The safe monitoring substations are installed near the input end and output end of the long-distance transportation pipeline and are connected to the electric regulating valve, pipeline pressure sensor, temperature sensor, ultrasonic flowmeter, and carbon dioxide sensor by utilizing the mine communication optical cable. The mine communication cable is utilized to connect the underground mine safe monitoring substation to the underground fiber switch and connect the ground integrated control terminal to the underground fiber switch [20].The system works as follows. The three-way gate valve to the gas phase end of the liquid CO2 tank is opened, and the ground and underground electric regulating valves are opened as well. Gaseous CO2 is utilized to dispose of the gas in the long-distance transmission pipeline, purging and exchanging gas for 10 minutes. The downhole electric regulating valve is closed to continuously increase the pressure of the long-distance transmission pipeline to 1.8–2.0 MPa, and the ground electric regulating valve is closed to ensure the desired value of pressure for 20 min. According to the data changes of pressure sensor, ultrasonic flowmeter, temperature, and CO2 sensor, the air tightness of long-distance transportation pipeline can be evaluated. The three-way gate valve to the liquid end of the liquid CO2 tank is opened; the ground electric control valve is opened as well; and the underground electric control, the pressure sensor of the conveying pipeline, the ultrasonic flowmeter, and the temperature sensor start working. The feedback data is used to intelligently adjust the opening and closing state of the downhole electric control valve, to ensure that the pressure in the long-distance transportation pipeline is maintained at 1.8–2.0 MPa. Liquid carbon dioxide is injected into the target area through the metal hose at the output end, achieving long-distance intelligent pressure-holding transportation of liquid CO2. When any CO2 sensor along the long-distance transportation pipeline detects carbon dioxide in a concentration exceeding the set limit (in the intake air flow of the mining face, it is 0.5%, and the other area limit settings refer to the relevant regulations of coal mine safety), or when the pressure sensor drops significantly close to the limit (the pipeline pressure limit is zero), the system automatically closes the ground and underground electric three-way gate valves and intelligently locks. After direct injection of liquid CO2 is completed, the three-way gate valve is opened to the gas phase end of the liquid CO2 tank, and the ground and underground electric regulating valves are opened as well. Gaseous CO2 is utilized to dispose of the gas in the long-distance transmission pipeline to ensure that the long-distance transmission pipeline is not blocked by dry ice. The air is purged for 10 minutes, the ground and underground electric regulating valves are closed, and the cleaning work of the long-distance transmission pipeline is completed [21].


## 6. Field Tests of Direct Injection of Ground Liquid CO2

### 6.1. Description

The field where the experiments have been carried out is now briefly described. There are 4 fully mechanized caving working faces, i.e., 202#, 204#, 206#, and 208#, in 12# lower seam located in the lower layer of the southern wing of Huojitujing 12# coal seam complex in Daliuta Coal Min. The working face is generally arranged along the inclination of the coal seam and advances along the strike. Directly above the working face is the goaf upper layer of the 12# coal seam area. The interval between layers is 1.5–4.7 m. The upper layer working face has a mining height of 3.5–4.0 m. Stopping was completed in 2005. The layout of 206# working face of 12# lower coal seam is shown in Figure16, and the test was carried out in September 2018. A scheme of the process is illustrated in Figure 17.Figure 16
Layout of 206# working face of 12# lower coal seam.Figure 17
Process scheme of ground liquid CO2 direct injection.The target area for direct injection of liquid CO2 is 206# deep gob in 12# lower coal seam. The surface power and water supply holes in the cutting hole area are utilized as drill holes. The surface of the borehole is used as system installation site, the power supply hole is used as vertical transmission hole for liquid CO2, and the low-temperature high-pressure resistant pipeline is about 84 m long. It is connected by a special welding method to the surface pressure-holding device and to the surface liquid CO2 tank through an austenitic metal body hose. The downhole direct injection pipeline is connected with the end of the ground drilling straight pipe through an austenitic metal hose. The terminal is connected to a long-distance automatic pressure-holding device, and the austenitic metal hose is connected to the observation hole through the roof of the tunnel. Arched steel plates and expansion screws are installed. Warning signs are installed to ensure safety. The monitoring substation is installed as well; 1500 m communication optical fiber is laid, to connect computers by means of a ring network. The signal line starts from the substation and connects the pipeline pressure-holding device, the CO2 sensor, and the ground and surface pipes through the water supply drilling. The length of the signal line is about 1200 m for the connection of the pressure-holding device at the road terminal.During the direct injection of liquid CO2, a value of 300 m3/min for the safe ventilation flow rate has been calculated and adopted, taking into account the limits of safe concentration of CO2 in a workplace.


### 6.2. Data Analysis

Liquid CO2 was infused for 3 hours (from 14:00 h to 17:00 h). The cumulative infusion amount was 60 t. The perfusion flow was 17.14–20.96 t/h. Gas in the 206# goaf of 12# lower coal seam was collected and analyzed in real time through the fire prevention monitoring and control system. Figure 18 illustrates the variation in time for O2 and CO2 concentration with reference to 4 observation holes.Figure 18
Variation in time of gaseous O2 and CO2 concentration upon tests of direct injection of CO2 in real field. Figures from top to bottom refer to four different observation points, named 29#, 30#, 31#, and 32#.
(a)(b)(c)(d)As far as observation point 29# is concerned, O2 concentration only little changed upon CO2 injection, and gaseous CO2 concentration fluctuated between 0% and 5%. At 09:00 h of the day after the day of the test, the O2 concentration in this area rose, and the gaseous CO2 concentration in the goaf was zero. The reason may be the solidification of liquid CO2 and the blockage of the bundle pipes by dry ice, causing only a small amount of gas to flow into the goaf, so these data are not meaningful for reference.We now discuss data at observation point 30#. The O2 concentration at the beginning of the injection dropped to zero, indicating that the area where liquid CO2 is injected is filled and made inert. Until 09:00 h of the subsequent day, O2 concentration fluctuated. At 11:00 h of this day, O2 concentration in the goaf rose to more than 15%, indicating that, under the positive pressure of mine ventilation, gaseous CO2 in the goaf was exhausted; during the entire process, the CO2 concentration was zero as the gaseous CO2 monitoring range of the fire prevention system is 0–20%, so higher concentration of CO2 put the detector out of service.As far as observation point 31# is concerned, it can be seen that the goaf area is affected by liquid CO2 infusion. O2 concentration fluctuated between 14% and 16%, and gaseous CO2 concentration between 2.0% and 3.31%. At 11:00 h of the subsequent day, O2 concentration rose to above 15%, and gaseous CO2 concentration in the goaf was zero.The last observation point is 32#. O2 concentration fluctuated between 14% and 16%, and gaseous CO2 concentration between 1% and 2.55%. At 11:57 h of the subsequent day, gaseous CO2 concentration was zero. This area was less affected by liquid CO2 infusion.At the same time, in order to investigate the intelligent locking performance of the equipment during the long-distance pressure-holding transportation process of ground liquid CO2, during the continuous infusion period, a pulsed gaseous CO2 release device was used, and the release location was selected to lay the long-distance transportation pipeline. The carbon dioxide sensor hanging on the roadside detected the gaseous CO2 with a content of 0.8%, the system was intelligently locked, and the ground control terminal sent out prompt warning.


### 6.3. Fire Prevention Effect

The actual daily advancing speed of 206# working face of 12# lower coal seam in Huojitujing well of Daliuta Coal Mine in Shendong mining area is less than 1m, and it has not therefore reached the designed daily advancing speed of 2m. Due to faults and floor swelling during the mining process, the working face did not reach the predicted advancing speed, which created conditions for oxidation and spontaneous combustion of the remaining coal. On a particular day, the CO concentration in the working face sharply rose, thus highlighting the possibility of spontaneous combustion in the goaf. When the air flow rate in the fully mechanized caving face equals 1020 m3/min, the CO concentration in the upper corner is, in regular conditions, 2 ppm. At 07:33 h of that day, the upper corner CO sensor raised the alarm with a concentration of 28.5 ppm; at 07:43 h, the return air CO sensor raised the alarm with a concentration of 37.5 ppm; and at 07:55 h, the return air outlet CO sensor raised the alarm with a concentration of 73.75 ppm. A gas sample was taken from the ground through a 30# observation hole (observation point 30#), and it was found that the concentration of CO was 800 ppm; 9 hours later, the concentration of CO rose to 1000 ppm. The spontaneous combustion of the leftover coal in the goaf switched from the slow to the rapid oxidation stage and began to enter the spontaneous combustion stage, which is enough to indicate that there is a fire in the goaf. Ethylene and acetylene were not seen in the fully mechanized caving face and its upper and lower troughs and gas drainage pipelines. Therefore, the fire did not yet fully enter the combustion stage and no open flame appeared.In order to obtain the best fire prevention effect, it is advisable to locate the release port in the natural oxidation zone of the goaf. This moves forward along with the working face, so the buried pipe for inert gas injection should be also moved forward regularly.The design value for gaseous CO2 injection volume is calculated according to(1)VCO2=W⋅H⋅L⋅K1⋅K2,where W is the inerting zone width (50 m), H its height (1.6 m), and L its length (155m); K1 is the gas displacement coefficient in the goaf (2.5); and K2 is the loose factor of the goaf (0.85). It is VCO2 = 26350 m3 [22].The air leakage flow velocity in the goaf spontaneous combustion zone isv = 0.1–0.2 m/min (average: 0.15 m/min). The cross-sectional area through the fire zone is S = W⋅H = 60 m2. Then, the flow rate of CO2 leakage is v⋅S = about 13000 m3 per day.The daily gas injection volume of carbon oxide was therefore 13000 m3. The amount of normal gas per ton of liquid CO2 vaporized is estimated at 550 m3, and the amount of liquid CO2 required per day is therefore 24 t.The pressure of the CO2 release port at the end of the pipeline should not be lower than 0.1–0.2 MPa, so that the outlet is always in the spray state to improve the inerting effect.Two injections, each of about 20 t liquid CO2, were performed. The second injection took place after 25.5 h with respect to the first one. The CO concentration in goaf near observation point 30# is reported as a function of time with reference to both liquid CO2 injections in Figure 19. This concentration began to gradually decrease after a delay of 2.5 hours from the beginning of the first injection. It then dropped from 790 ppm to 140 ppm during the first liquid CO2 injection. Then, the second injection took place (the initial value of the CO concentration = 140 ppm). The pattern of CO concentration is now hump-like; CO concentration “rebounds” with a maximum value not higher than 180 ppm around 4 h after the beginning of the second stage. The reason is that, after the injection of carbon dioxide is stopped, the carbon dioxide located at the fire source diffuses to its surroundings, causing the CO2 concentration at the fire source to decrease. The final value of the CO concentration at the end of the second stage, whose duration is 16 h, is 40 ppm.Figure 19
Variation of CO concentration during the first (top) and second (bottom) injection.
(a)(b)


## 6.1. Description

The field where the experiments have been carried out is now briefly described. There are 4 fully mechanized caving working faces, i.e., 202#, 204#, 206#, and 208#, in 12# lower seam located in the lower layer of the southern wing of Huojitujing 12# coal seam complex in Daliuta Coal Min. The working face is generally arranged along the inclination of the coal seam and advances along the strike. Directly above the working face is the goaf upper layer of the 12# coal seam area. The interval between layers is 1.5–4.7 m. The upper layer working face has a mining height of 3.5–4.0 m. Stopping was completed in 2005. The layout of 206# working face of 12# lower coal seam is shown in Figure16, and the test was carried out in September 2018. A scheme of the process is illustrated in Figure 17.Figure 16
Layout of 206# working face of 12# lower coal seam.Figure 17
Process scheme of ground liquid CO2 direct injection.The target area for direct injection of liquid CO2 is 206# deep gob in 12# lower coal seam. The surface power and water supply holes in the cutting hole area are utilized as drill holes. The surface of the borehole is used as system installation site, the power supply hole is used as vertical transmission hole for liquid CO2, and the low-temperature high-pressure resistant pipeline is about 84 m long. It is connected by a special welding method to the surface pressure-holding device and to the surface liquid CO2 tank through an austenitic metal body hose. The downhole direct injection pipeline is connected with the end of the ground drilling straight pipe through an austenitic metal hose. The terminal is connected to a long-distance automatic pressure-holding device, and the austenitic metal hose is connected to the observation hole through the roof of the tunnel. Arched steel plates and expansion screws are installed. Warning signs are installed to ensure safety. The monitoring substation is installed as well; 1500 m communication optical fiber is laid, to connect computers by means of a ring network. The signal line starts from the substation and connects the pipeline pressure-holding device, the CO2 sensor, and the ground and surface pipes through the water supply drilling. The length of the signal line is about 1200 m for the connection of the pressure-holding device at the road terminal.During the direct injection of liquid CO2, a value of 300 m3/min for the safe ventilation flow rate has been calculated and adopted, taking into account the limits of safe concentration of CO2 in a workplace.


## 6.2. Data Analysis

Liquid CO2 was infused for 3 hours (from 14:00 h to 17:00 h). The cumulative infusion amount was 60 t. The perfusion flow was 17.14–20.96 t/h. Gas in the 206# goaf of 12# lower coal seam was collected and analyzed in real time through the fire prevention monitoring and control system. Figure 18 illustrates the variation in time for O2 and CO2 concentration with reference to 4 observation holes.Figure 18
Variation in time of gaseous O2 and CO2 concentration upon tests of direct injection of CO2 in real field. Figures from top to bottom refer to four different observation points, named 29#, 30#, 31#, and 32#.
(a)(b)(c)(d)As far as observation point 29# is concerned, O2 concentration only little changed upon CO2 injection, and gaseous CO2 concentration fluctuated between 0% and 5%. At 09:00 h of the day after the day of the test, the O2 concentration in this area rose, and the gaseous CO2 concentration in the goaf was zero. The reason may be the solidification of liquid CO2 and the blockage of the bundle pipes by dry ice, causing only a small amount of gas to flow into the goaf, so these data are not meaningful for reference.We now discuss data at observation point 30#. The O2 concentration at the beginning of the injection dropped to zero, indicating that the area where liquid CO2 is injected is filled and made inert. Until 09:00 h of the subsequent day, O2 concentration fluctuated. At 11:00 h of this day, O2 concentration in the goaf rose to more than 15%, indicating that, under the positive pressure of mine ventilation, gaseous CO2 in the goaf was exhausted; during the entire process, the CO2 concentration was zero as the gaseous CO2 monitoring range of the fire prevention system is 0–20%, so higher concentration of CO2 put the detector out of service.As far as observation point 31# is concerned, it can be seen that the goaf area is affected by liquid CO2 infusion. O2 concentration fluctuated between 14% and 16%, and gaseous CO2 concentration between 2.0% and 3.31%. At 11:00 h of the subsequent day, O2 concentration rose to above 15%, and gaseous CO2 concentration in the goaf was zero.The last observation point is 32#. O2 concentration fluctuated between 14% and 16%, and gaseous CO2 concentration between 1% and 2.55%. At 11:57 h of the subsequent day, gaseous CO2 concentration was zero. This area was less affected by liquid CO2 infusion.At the same time, in order to investigate the intelligent locking performance of the equipment during the long-distance pressure-holding transportation process of ground liquid CO2, during the continuous infusion period, a pulsed gaseous CO2 release device was used, and the release location was selected to lay the long-distance transportation pipeline. The carbon dioxide sensor hanging on the roadside detected the gaseous CO2 with a content of 0.8%, the system was intelligently locked, and the ground control terminal sent out prompt warning.


## 6.3. Fire Prevention Effect

The actual daily advancing speed of 206# working face of 12# lower coal seam in Huojitujing well of Daliuta Coal Mine in Shendong mining area is less than 1m, and it has not therefore reached the designed daily advancing speed of 2m. Due to faults and floor swelling during the mining process, the working face did not reach the predicted advancing speed, which created conditions for oxidation and spontaneous combustion of the remaining coal. On a particular day, the CO concentration in the working face sharply rose, thus highlighting the possibility of spontaneous combustion in the goaf. When the air flow rate in the fully mechanized caving face equals 1020 m3/min, the CO concentration in the upper corner is, in regular conditions, 2 ppm. At 07:33 h of that day, the upper corner CO sensor raised the alarm with a concentration of 28.5 ppm; at 07:43 h, the return air CO sensor raised the alarm with a concentration of 37.5 ppm; and at 07:55 h, the return air outlet CO sensor raised the alarm with a concentration of 73.75 ppm. A gas sample was taken from the ground through a 30# observation hole (observation point 30#), and it was found that the concentration of CO was 800 ppm; 9 hours later, the concentration of CO rose to 1000 ppm. The spontaneous combustion of the leftover coal in the goaf switched from the slow to the rapid oxidation stage and began to enter the spontaneous combustion stage, which is enough to indicate that there is a fire in the goaf. Ethylene and acetylene were not seen in the fully mechanized caving face and its upper and lower troughs and gas drainage pipelines. Therefore, the fire did not yet fully enter the combustion stage and no open flame appeared.In order to obtain the best fire prevention effect, it is advisable to locate the release port in the natural oxidation zone of the goaf. This moves forward along with the working face, so the buried pipe for inert gas injection should be also moved forward regularly.The design value for gaseous CO2 injection volume is calculated according to(1)VCO2=W⋅H⋅L⋅K1⋅K2,where W is the inerting zone width (50 m), H its height (1.6 m), and L its length (155m); K1 is the gas displacement coefficient in the goaf (2.5); and K2 is the loose factor of the goaf (0.85). It is VCO2 = 26350 m3 [22].The air leakage flow velocity in the goaf spontaneous combustion zone isv = 0.1–0.2 m/min (average: 0.15 m/min). The cross-sectional area through the fire zone is S = W⋅H = 60 m2. Then, the flow rate of CO2 leakage is v⋅S = about 13000 m3 per day.The daily gas injection volume of carbon oxide was therefore 13000 m3. The amount of normal gas per ton of liquid CO2 vaporized is estimated at 550 m3, and the amount of liquid CO2 required per day is therefore 24 t.The pressure of the CO2 release port at the end of the pipeline should not be lower than 0.1–0.2 MPa, so that the outlet is always in the spray state to improve the inerting effect.Two injections, each of about 20 t liquid CO2, were performed. The second injection took place after 25.5 h with respect to the first one. The CO concentration in goaf near observation point 30# is reported as a function of time with reference to both liquid CO2 injections in Figure 19. This concentration began to gradually decrease after a delay of 2.5 hours from the beginning of the first injection. It then dropped from 790 ppm to 140 ppm during the first liquid CO2 injection. Then, the second injection took place (the initial value of the CO concentration = 140 ppm). The pattern of CO concentration is now hump-like; CO concentration “rebounds” with a maximum value not higher than 180 ppm around 4 h after the beginning of the second stage. The reason is that, after the injection of carbon dioxide is stopped, the carbon dioxide located at the fire source diffuses to its surroundings, causing the CO2 concentration at the fire source to decrease. The final value of the CO concentration at the end of the second stage, whose duration is 16 h, is 40 ppm.Figure 19
Variation of CO concentration during the first (top) and second (bottom) injection.
(a)(b)


## 7. Discussion

The adsorption, cooling, and diffusion of liquid CO2 in loose coal mines are analyzed through experiments that can provide a good theoretical basis for numerical simulation and industrial testing. The numerical software simulates the diffusion range of CO2 in the goaf, thereby verifying the experimental observation that the liquid CO2 has good diffusion properties. Based on the theoretical basis supported by the experimental data, industrial experiments are carried out, and the actual application effect of liquid CO2 in fire prevention and extinguishing is analyzed through the change in the concentration of the coal spontaneous combustion indicator (CO) in the on-site goaf. In this way, the correctness of the experimental theory is verified by practice.Ma et al. studied the spontaneous combustion characteristic parameters of coal after CO2 adsorption [23]. In an experiment about oxygen consumption characteristic during the coal heating process under atmosphere with different CO2 concentration, they observed that the activation energy of coal-oxygen reaction, after adding CO2, increases and the coal oxidation reaction rate correspondingly decreases. TG-DTG-DSC was utilized to study the coal sample during the spontaneous combustion and oxidation process of three typical samples in four different atmospheres and different heating rates. The kinetic parameters for coal oxidation were calculated, and the influence of CO2 in inhibiting coal spontaneous combustion was determined. With the increase of CO2 concentration, the apparent activation energy and preexponential factor for coal oxidation reaction rapidly decrease, and the overall reaction rate and the heat release decrease as well. Zhang determined the distribution of the “three zones” of spontaneous combustion in the goaf after liquid CO2 injection and showed that these zones were redistributed, the heat dissipation zone was significantly shortened, and the oxidation zone moved forward [24].Though showing relevant results, the above research has a limitation; that is, only the macroscopic analysis of the inerting effect of CO2 is investigated, while the mechanism of CO2 in inhibiting the coal spontaneous combustion process is still worthy of investigation, as well as the temperature and concentration distribution in the goaf that need to be quantitatively studied and analyzed.Accordingly, this project studies CO2 migration fire prevention characteristics in shallow buried near-horizontal goafs, including CO2 microscopic mechanism of inhibiting coal spontaneous combustion, core area of jet and phase change after CO2 is injected into the goaf, diffusion radius, effective inerting radius, cooling range, and cooling degree.Zhao et al. studied the functional relationship between the flow rate and the temperature and pressure drop ratio when liquid CO2 steadily flows in the pipeline, and determined the limiting pressure drop ratio and critical flow rate for dry ice [25].In the practice of liquid CO2 direct injection technology, as for the problem of short transportation distances, poor reliability of pressure-holding conveying can be observed, thereby being unable to realize real-time monitoring of pipeline fluid and environmental parameters. Accordingly, this project studies the appropriate liquid CO2 injection form, release port position, outlet pressure, release flow, and other process parameters, in order to form a perfusion capacity higher than 10 t/h at transportation distance longer than 800 m. Field application and tests were conducted; the performance of each system and fire prevention technology were optimized and improved; and a liquid CO2 direct injection system with automatic pressure regulation, safety relief, automatic alarm, and lockout functions was developed, in order to achieve long-distance safe transportation of liquid CO2. However, there were still problems of limited liquid CO2 injection and short injection time. Due to limited budget, it was difficult to carry out large-scale and long-term perfusion tests to fill the entire composite mined-out area. Therefore, it was not possible to more accurately study the critical amount of liquid CO2 and the migration and diffusion radius that fill the entire goaf. Moreover, during the industrial tests carried out here, the gaseous CO2 monitoring range of the fire prevention monitoring system was 0–20% only. Therefore, higher values were not detectable, and the concentration change of the highly concentrated liquid CO2 near the direct injection port could not be monitored in real time. In addition, some monitoring beam tubes were blocked due to solidification of liquid CO2, which causes data distortion in some pipelines. Therefore, in the future, we will choose real mines with spontaneous fires to carry out large-flow and long-term liquid CO2 direct injection industrial tests, and choose a CO2 monitoring system with a larger monitoring range.However, this project still brings economic and social benefits. This technology in fact uses liquid CO2 as a new fire prevention material under the possible coexistence of multiple types of fires such as those in mine coal field, small kiln, and multilayer mined-out and hidden high-temperature areas. Ensuring the safe mining of the working face can determine significant cost savings and, at the same time, protect mining operators. In addition, the use of liquid CO2 can have advantages in terms of reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.The research content of the project meets the development requirements of sustainable strategies in coal industry and pushes forward the research direction and technical countermeasures for major coal mine fire safety. Technological market application prospects are broad, as the technical system plays a leading role in the related mine fire prevention technology and equipment.


## 8. Conclusion

In the coal cooling experiments, it was seen that larger coal particle sizes lead to better cooling effect. For coal samples in the same tank, those located in upper and middle positions show better cooling. The cooling of the coal samples can be roughly divided into three stages. The second and third stages are greatly affected by the particle size. The time occupied by the second stage decreases with the increase of the coal sample size, and the time occupied by the third stage correspondingly increases.The critical temperature of the coal sample is 60–80°C, and the dry cracking temperature is 100–130°C. As the concentration of carbon dioxide and nitrogen increases, the concentration of oxygen decreases, and the characteristic temperature of the coal sample gradually increases; besides, when the oxygen concentration just begins to decrease, the characteristic temperature changes, which means that the characteristic temperature of the coal sample has an effect on CO2 concentration. The sensitivity decreases with increasing O2 concentration. At the same time, in the experiment with a higher amount of added CO2, the characteristic temperature of the coal sample is higher, the inerting effect on the coal sample is better, and the coal spontaneous combustion is less likely to occur. The oxygen consumption rate of the coal sample increases with the increase of the O2 concentration in the carrier gas during the oxidation and heating process.The higher the CO2 concentration, the higher the peak temperature of the coal sample in the DSC experiment, but an inverse relationship with the maximum heat release rate is observed. At the same time, the apparent activation energy of coal samples increases as the CO2 concentration increases, and the sensitivity of the apparent activation energy of coal to the concentration of CO2 is different.An intelligent pressure-holding transportation of liquid CO2 in the 1000 m transportation pipeline was developed. The surface liquid CO2 infusion capacity is 20 t/h. The pressure-holding interval at the end of the transportation pipeline is determined to be 1–2.3 MPa. The maximum diffusion radius of the goaf is 300 m. Under the influence of reverse wind flow and self-expansion and diffusion, the diffusion radius of the goaf is 150 m. The maximum storage time of gaseous CO2 in the goaf is 27 h.Because the large amount of CO2 injected into the goaf is adsorbed by coal or dissolved by water, even under high-intensity injection, the amount of emitted CO2 is not large, and the maximum concentration of CO in the working face and in the return air flow is only 0.03%, which is within the limits. This can ensure the safety of the CO2 infusion working face.In the case of a fire in the fully mechanized mining or caving face, as long as the oxidation and spontaneous combustion of coal has not developed to a rapid reaction stage, CO2 can prevent and extinguish the fire. The success or failure lies in the early detection of the fire. In case of fire and smoke, close measures should be taken immediately, and then the fire can be put out.



---

*Source: 5572963-2021-05-12.xml*