# Study on Fracture Distribution and Local Brittleness Characteristics Based on Stepwise Regression Method

Authors: Wanchun Zhao; Xiaohan Feng; Tingting Wang
Journal: Geofluids
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

The brittleness of rock is an important parameter that influences and controls the evolution mechanism of the fracture and formation of a fracture net. The existing methods of brittle characterization are describing the brittleness of rock mass as a whole. They lack reliability descriptions to guide the fracture strike and improve the volume of the reservoir. It is considered that the macroscopic brittle fracture of a rock is the process of continuous initiation and propagation of local fractures in the rock mass under the action of external loads. The macroscopic fracture is the appearance caused by a local rupture to a certain extent, and the local rupture is the root cause of macroscopic fracture. The study of the local brittleness of a rock can reveal the intrinsic nature of its fracture behavior and can reflect the evolution mechanism of fracture more directly and accurately. In this paper, coring sampling in field outcrop is first carried out, and the break evolution law of core is described by a CT scanner. The mineral compositions in the core are determined by a mineral analysis diffractometer. The regulation of the rock local brittleness with different mineral contents is analyzed. And a new method for local brittle region division and characterization of rock has been developed. This method gives the connotation relation of the rock brittle fracture as a whole induced by a local brittle fracture. And it provides a new approach to study the law of a rock fracture.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

With the shortening of the proven oil and gas reserves, unconventional oil and gas exploitation is the inevitable development trend in the future to ensure the sustained and stable oil and gas production. As a new type of clean energy, unconventional oil and gas has the advantages of wide resource distribution, abundant reserves, and long exploitation life. It has become a hot spot in global oil and gas exploration and development.For unconventional oil and gas reservoir development, the large-scale volume fracturing method is often used to reform. This method is efficient and economical, and the effect of improving reservoir permeability is outstanding. The study shows that the brittleness of a rock can significantly affect the reservoir fracturing effect and wellbore stability [1]. Therefore, the evaluation of brittleness characteristics has become the primary factor to be considered in fracturing well selection and scheme design [2]. Statistical analysis shows that there are more than 30 methods to characterize brittleness [3–23]. Most of these methods are put forward to specific problems, applicable to different disciplines, each with its own advantages and limitations. During this period, Zhaoping and Suping [24] applied the methods of X-ray diffraction, fluorescence spectrum analysis, and mechanical test to study the mineral composition and chemical composition characteristics of coal-bearing mudstone. They established a qualitative and quantitative relationship between the mechanical properties (including uniaxial compressive strength and elastic modulus) of mudstone and its chemical composition (including SiO2 and FeO) and found that the uniaxial compressive strength and modulus of elasticity of mudstone increased with the increase of SiO2 content. Burnaman and other scholars [25, 26] consider that mineral composition is the internal reason for controlling rock brittleness and causing a difference in the fracture net fracturing effect and makes a three-terminal element diagram of a rock brittle to evaluate the brittleness qualitatively according to the relative content of minerals in shale. Wen-Long’s [27] analysis shows that the rock with high contents of quartz, feldspar, and carbonate is brittle. This kind of rock is easy to form natural fractures and induced fractures under the action of external forces, and its development degree is generally positively correlated with the content of brittle minerals. Liu et al. [28] found that the mineral content, composition distribution, and fracture development characteristics are important internal controlling factors affecting the brittleness of rock mass. In the same year, Gale et al. [29] found a negative correlation between the clay mineral content and natural fracture development characteristics, as shown in Figure 1. Lin et al. [30] established a nonlinear viscoplastic element on the basis of time-dependent shear strength by connecting the plastic element representing shear strength with the viscous element in parallel and studied effectively the mechanical properties of rock from the point of difference of shear strength. Zhang et al. [31] are using the discrete element numerical method to establish five different numerical models of regular sawtooth joints, study the shear mechanical characteristics of joints under creep condition, and analyze the influence of creep on the mechanical characteristics of joints. Xiangyuan et al. [32] obtained that reservoir brittleness controlled the development characteristics and degree of natural fractures based on the analysis of Chang 7 tight reservoir in Longdong Area. The larger the reservoir brittleness is, the more likely the fracture will occur under the action of tectonic stress, which will lead to the increase of fracture development. That is, the higher the content of brittle minerals (quartz, calcite, dolomite, and feldspar) in shale, the more developed the natural fractures in the area and the larger the brittleness. And the higher the content of clay minerals, the less developed the natural fractures in the area and the larger the toughness, as shown in Figure 2.Figure 1
Mineral composition and fracture development diagram.Figure 2
Brittleness and nature fracture relation chart.At present, the following two methods are widely used to calculate the rock brittleness in the industry. One is the rock mineral analysis method proposed by Jravie et al. [33] in 2009. In this method, quartz is regarded as a brittle mineral. And the contents of quartz, carbonate rock, and clay are measured, so as to calculate the rock brittleness, as shown in formula (1).(1)BRIT=VquartzVquartz+Vcarbonaterock+Vclay×100,where BRIT is the rock brittleness index and V is the mineral volume.Another commonly used method for calculating rock brittleness is the elastic parameter method proposed by Xue et al. [34] in 2007, as shown in formula (2). According to this method, the higher the elastic modulus of rock is, the lower Poisson’s ratio is, and the larger the rock brittleness is, as shown in Figure 3. The brittleness index of the rock is defined by the method of mechanics parameters, which is generally accepted and adopted in the field.(2)BRIT=12E−EminEmax−Emin+ν−νmaxνmin−νmax×100,where Emax is the maximum elastic modulus of the rock, Emin is the minimum elastic modulus of te rock, νmax is maximum Poisson’s ratio of the rock, and νmin is minimum Poisson’s ratio of the rock.Figure 3
The influence chart of brittleness between the elastic modulus and Poisson ratio [35].Both of these methods can accurately characterize the brittleness of reservoir rocks to a certain extent. However, the brittleness description is based on the analysis of the overall brittleness of the research object, and the influence of natural fracture development on rock brittleness in reservoir cannot be described. In 2015, Bing et al. [36] analyzed the acoustic emission signal of the fracturing test and found that the peak of AE accumulation events occurred before the pump pressure reached the peak rupture pressure. This phenomenon shows that before the macrofracture of the rock mass, many microfractures have appeared in it, and the accumulation of microfracture finally leads to the fracture of the core as a whole. Wang et al. [37] proposed a new index for the brittleness evaluation of rock mass based on catastrophe theory and found that the softening modulus and brittleness index changed in polynomial with the increase of confining pressure.Therefore, it is considered in this paper that the macrobrittle fracture of the rock is a process of local fracture initiation, propagation, microfracture, and gradual deterioration of rock matrix under external loads. The study of the local brittleness characteristics of the rock mass can reveal the intrinsic essence of the rock microfracture behavior and can more directly and accurately reflect the fracturing capacity and fracture evolution mechanism. Firstly, the law of local fracture propagation and fracture in shale during compression test is analyzed by CT scanning. And a method for characterizing local brittleness of shale is established by means of diffraction analysis of the core mineral composition and stepwise regression method. Finally, the local brittle fracture law of an artificial fracture is analyzed by a hydraulic fracturing test.


## 2. Analysis of Shale Core Compressive Fracture Law by CT Scanning

In this paper, the SkyScan 1172 high-resolution CT machine is used for the CT scanning test, as shown in Figure4. This machine is a product of SkyScan company in Belgium. It uses the principle of microfocus X-ray imaging to perform ultrahigh-resolution three-dimensional imaging, which can obtain high-precision three-dimensional images without damaging the core. It is small in size, high in resolution, and can observe very fine structure without sample preparation, dyeing, and slicing. The test cores are taken from layer B in block A in Liaohe Oilfield, as shown in Figure 5. The core is scanned by CT, and the fracture distribution of the sample after CT scanning is obtained in 30 s, 90 s, 120 s, and 180 s, as shown in Figure 6 [38].Figure 4
SkyScan 1172 high-resolution CT scanner.Figure 5
The core sample for CT scan.Figure 6
The fracture distribution images of CT scan core.
(a)
Scanning image in 30 s(b)
Scanning image in 90 s(c)
Scanning image in 120 s(d)
Scanning image in 180 sThe CT scan results show that the process of shale rupture begins with the formation of local short microfractures in the core between 0 and 30 s. With time between 30 s and 90 s, local microfractures grow longer and new ones form elsewhere. When the time reaches 120 s, the microfractures intersect and connect with others to form larger microfractures, which cause core instability and fracture at 180 s. Therefore, the macrofracture of shale is the phenomenon caused by local fracture to a certain extent, and the local fracture is the fundamental cause of macrofracture.


## 3. Establishment of Rock Local Brittleness Characterization Method

Because the macrofracture of a rock is caused by the local brittle fracture and expansion, how to characterize the rock local brittleness has become an important research content in this paper. It is impossible to analyze the rock brittle distribution from the microscopic field by means of rock mechanical parameters or stress-strain tests. The mineral component analysis method is used to describe the rock brittle distribution in this paper. The mineral analysis method proposed by Rickman only considers the rock mineral composition itself, without considering the influence of rock heterogeneity, reservoir environmental factors, and the development of natural fractures. Therefore, this method is improved and perfected.In this paper, the rock local brittleness distribution is analyzed based on reservoir heterogeneity. And the stepwise regression analysis is used to screen the main controlling factors to study the influence of different mineral components on the elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio of rock. This method means that when a phenomenon is affected by multiple factors at the same time, the inversion compact transformation method and bidirectional test method are used to gradually analyze the contribution of influencing factors to the explained variables. If the factor is discriminated, it will be introduced into the stepwise regression model. According to theF test, the significance analysis of the introduced parameters is conducted to determine whether the relevant parameters in the regression model need to be eliminated because of the change of contribution. After repeated screening and elimination, the optimal regression equation is established. The stepwise regression analysis can include many explanatory variables. The explanatory variables of this method are the rock elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio, and the explained variables are the content determination values of quartz, potassium feldspar, plagioclase, calcite, dolomite, analcite, siderite, pyrite, and clay minerals. The general form of the established regression model is(3)Y^=β0+β1Zquartz+β2Zpotassium‐feldspar+⋯+βjZj,where βjj=0,1,2,⋯,9 are regression coefficients, Y^ are explained variables including the rock elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio, and Zj (j=quartz,potassium,⋯,clayminerals) are the experimental values of 9 explanatory variables that have significant influence on Y^.Because of the experimental data withn periods, the correlation coefficients between explanatory variables and explained variables are calculated based on these data, as shown in formula (4). The initial correlation coefficient matrix of regression analysis is established according to the correlation coefficient between different parameters, as shown in formula (5).(4)rXY=∑i=1nXi−X¯Yi−Y¯∑i=1nXi−X¯2∑i=1nYi−Y¯2,(5)R=rquartzquartz⋯rquartzY⋯⋯⋯rYquartz⋯rYY,where Xi and Yi are the experimental values of parameters, X¯ and Y¯ are the average values of parameters’ experimental data, rXY are the correlation coefficients between parameters X and Y, and R is to obtain the initial correlation coefficient matrix by one-to-one correspondence calculation of the research parameters.According to the initial correlation coefficient matrix, the partial regression square sumui between explanatory variables and explained variables which represents the contribution of different parameters in regression equation, as shown in formula (6).(6)ui=riY2rii.The parameter which has a maximum partial regression square sum is selected as the introduction parameter and tested by theF test method. When the test result is larger than the empirical threshold, this parameter can be introduced into the regression equation as a regression parameter. Conversely, the parameter cannot be introduced into the regression equation and need to be eliminated. Its F test method is shown in formula (7). The critical threshold is determined by referring to the F distribution table.(7)Fin=ui/f1rYY−ui/f2,where Fin is the F test value when the parameter is quoted; f1 is the number of independent variables introduced this time, usually 1 is appropriate; f2=n−m−1, in which n is the number of experimental groups and m is the number of independent variables introduced into the regression equation.When the parameter is quoted successfully, it is required to use it as the primary element. The contribution of this parameter should be eliminated by the inversion compact transformation method, and the new correlation coefficient matrix should be calculated. Through the new correlation coefficient matrix, the contribution degree of residual parameters can be calculated by partial regression square sum of research parameters, and then, the parameters of the newly introduced regression equation can be determined byF test. At the same time, due to the introduction of new parameters, the contribution of parameters in the regression equation needs to be redistributed, and the selected parameters need to be tested by F test in reverse to eliminate the parameters that cannot pass, as shown in formula (8).(8)Fout=ui/f1rYYl/f2,where Fout is the F test value when the parameter is eliminated.Repeatedly quoting and eliminating parameters until the regression equation cannot quote and eliminate any variables. In this case, all the selected parameters are independent variables for the regression equation.After choosing the influencing parameters of the regression equation, the regression coefficients of each parameter can be calculated by formula (9). The regression coefficients of the unselected variables are all 0. After the calculation, the average value of the experimental data is substituted into the regression equation to calculate the regression coefficient β0, as shown in formula (10).(9)βi=σYσiriYl,(10)β0=Y¯−∑i=19βiZ¯i,where σi is the variance of the experimental data of parameter i, σY is the variance of the experimental data of explained variable Y, Z¯i is the average value of the experimental data of parameter i, and Y¯ is the average value of the experimental data of explained variable Y.After establishing a complete regression equation, the accuracy of the regression equation can be verified by significance analysis, and the calculation process is shown in formula (11). When the calculation result is larger than the critical threshold value, it shows that the regression equation is significant and the linear relationship is accurate, which can be used as an effective result.(11)Fsignificant=1−rYYl/krYYl/n−k−1,where Fsignificant is the significant analysis result of regression equation and k is the principal element of the correlation coefficient matrix.The regression equations of the rock elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio calculated by the stepwise regression analysis method areE¯ and ν¯, respectively. So for a new core sample, it can be discretized into infinitesimal units, as shown in Figure 7.Figure 7
Sketch map of core discretization.At this time, each core unit can be represented byo,p,q in azimuth. The corresponding modulus of elasticity E¯o,p,q and Poisson’s ratio ν¯o,p,q are calculated according to the regression equation after the mineral composition content of each unit is determined. By substituting the results into the elastic parameter method in formula (2), the rock local brittleness expression formula can be obtained as follows:(12)BRITo,p,q=12E¯o,p,q−EminEmax−Emin+ν¯o,p,q−νmaxνmin−νmax×100.Formula (12) is the expression of rock local brittleness. This formula combines the study of reservoir environment to analyze and quantify the influence of mineral composition on the rock brittleness. The results are scientific and representative. And the local brittleness change low can be accurately characterized according to the heterogeneity of reservoir.


## 4. Case Verification

In this paper, the microarea mineral composition diffraction test is carried out by D8-ADVANCE X-ray diffractometer, as shown in Figure8. This machine is produced by BRUKED-AXS Co. Ltd. of Germany, which is one of the most advanced X-ray diffractometer systems in the world. Its high-precision goniometer can satisfy the error of measuring peak position of any diffraction peaks in the whole spectrum range with the standard peak position not exceeding 0.01 degrees. The test cores are taken from layer B in block A in Liaohe Oilfield, with a total of 22 cores, as shown in Figure 9.Figure 8
D8-ADVANCE X-ray diffractometer.Figure 9
The core samples.Firstly, mechanical parameters such as the elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio of test cores are measured by simulating the actual stress of the formation through the triaxial compressive test, and the mineral compositions of test cores are analyzed by an X-ray diffractometer. The specific data obtained are shown in Table1.Table 1
The determination result of core mineral compositions and mechanical parameters.
Serial numberThe type and content of mineralsClay mineralsElastic modulus (GPa)Poisson’s ratioQuartzPotassium feldsparPlagioclaseCalciteDolomiteAnalciteSideritePyrite10.2030.0310.1680.0330.2020.1320.0210.0250.18529.230.28520.1970.0360.0730.0890.0950.2910.0180.0190.18231.790.27830.1480.0380.1660.0440.2170.1210.0140.0280.22424.650.30740.2890.0320.13800.2480.089000.20426.980.27150.2110.040.1590.0520.1510.1360.0150.020.21626.740.28360.1950.0370.1650.0110.2140.14000.23824.880.28870.1770.0540.27300.1530.03300.0150.29521.560.28180.0960.0430.12500.1160.3410.0750.0320.17222.560.27490.1060.070.1170.020.2670.160.030.0180.21226.270.274100.120.0730.2420.110.180.050.0130.0240.18821.930.297110.2030.0710.1690.0240.0730.1820.05600.22222.10.28120.2180.0270.1140.0110.3130.1090.10100.10729.530.271130.2510.1030.16400.1890.040.0870.030.13631.630.268140.1960.0650.0960.020.1390.309000.175300.271150.1240.0580.0630.0170.0540.4290.01900.23628.840.279160.1310.1480.210.0390.2560.0280.0170.0420.12929.530.281170.0680.1440.3160.0370.24500.0220.0150.15326.280.289180.1220.0670.3750.0190.1770.0480.03100.16128.60.273190.0950.1010.1130.0360.3590.0450.0160.0270.20823.490.312200.1250.120.1920.1440.1410.0950.0130.0460.12425.210.272210.1980.0590.1030.150.1080.1680.04800.16621.420.274220.0610.0840.4580.0340.1370.0170.04900.1622.530.284According to the data analysis, the core samples taken in block A of Liaohe Oilfield are mainly composed of quartz, potassium feldspar, plagioclase, dolomite, and clay minerals. Some cores contain calcite, analcite, siderite and pyrite, and others are too low to be considered in this paper. The core elastic modulus is in the range of21.42,31.79 and the Poisson’s ratio is in the range of 0.268,0.312.Through stepwise regression analysis, the initial correlation coefficient matrixR among elastic modulus, Poisson’s ratio, and mineral contents are calculated as shown in Table 2.Table 2
The initial correlation coefficient matrixR.
R =1-0.50037-0.45817-0.13212-0.052140.094810.05809-0.247190.083930.35372-0.39678-0.5003710.363130.194350.19137-0.45001-0.030550.44192-0.418780.001990.090176-0.458170.363131-0.058670.01911-0.65828-0.02337-0.07040-0.12159-0.276250.110721-0.132120.19435-0.058671-0.24949-0.04570-0.159950.27187-0.27396-0.238830.098718-0.052140.191370.01911-0.249491-0.57396-0.001980.19780-0.196210.117370.36020.09481-0.45001-0.65828-0.04570-0.5739610.02244-0.207170.202910.19098-0.272160.05809-0.03055-0.02337-0.15995-0.001980.022441-0.05565-0.524060.06922-0.36284-0.247190.44192-0.070400.271870.19780-0.20717-0.055651-0.242430.053790.2305050.08393-0.41878-0.12159-0.27396-0.196210.20291-0.52406-0.242431-0.394160.3572590.353720.00199-0.27625-0.238830.117370.190980.069220.05379-0.394161/-0.396780.0901760.1107210.0987180.3602-0.27216-0.362840.2305050.357259/1The critical threshold of the model is mainly related to reliability and free degree, so the screening limit should not be too large; otherwise, the introduction of fewer variables will make the model impractical. In this paper, four parameters are introduced to establish the regression model, and the critical threshold isF0.054,17. From the F distribution table, we can see that F0.054,17=2.96.According to the stepwise regression analysis, the process of quoted and eliminating parameters of core elasticity modulus and Poisson’s ratio by inversion compact transformation method and bidirectional test method is shown in Table3.Table 3
Flow table for introducing the elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio parameters.
Introduced variablesElastic modulusEPoisson’s ratioνumaxFinuminFoutResultsumaxFinuminFoutResultsFirst variable0.1553.679Clay minerals in0.1573.737Quartz inSecond variable0.1514.126Quartz in0.1544.237Clay minerals inThird variable0.1013.0810.1814.954Calcite in0.1796..3340.1835.059Dolomite inFourth variable0.1214.3770.1223.708Siderite in0.0984.0430.1706.011Calcite inFifth variable0.0994.2530.1435.144Analcite in0..0080.3140.1355.572End of regressionSixth variable0.0130.5300.1264.467End of regressionAfter the influence parameters of the core elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio are quoted and eliminated for many times, the regression coefficients of the elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio are calculated by formulas (10) and (11), as shown in Table 4.Table 4
Stepwise regression analysis results.
Regression coefficientElastic modulusEPoisson’s ratioνInitial coefficient37.63740.2472Quartz20.1992-0.0714Potassium feldspar00Plagioclase00Calcite-38.55680.0911Dolomite00.0813Analcite9.57810Siderite-60.08740Pyrite00Clay minerals-68.15630.154By substituting the results of the stepwise regression analysis into formula (3), the regression model between the core elastic modulus, Poisson’s ratio, and mineral compositions can be obtained as follows:(13)E=37.6374+20.1992xquartz−38.5568xcalcite+9.5781xanalcite−60.0874xsiderite−68.1563xclay,(14)ν=0.2472−0.0714xquartz+0.0911xclacite+0.0813xdolomite+0.154xclay.According to the stepwise regression analysis, the main factors affecting the rock elastic modulus under simulated confining pressure include the contents of quartz, calcite, analcite, siderite, and clay minerals. And the main factors affecting rock Poisson’s ratio include the contents of quartz, calcite, dolomite, and clay minerals. Among them, the content of quartz and analcite is positively correlated with the rock elastic modulus and the content of calcite, siderite, and clay minerals is negatively correlated with the rock elastic modulus. The content of calcite, dolomite, and clay minerals is positively correlated with rock Poisson’s ratio, and the content of quartz is negatively correlated with rock Poisson’s ratio.The regression equations are tested and analyzed by significance test andR2. The calculation by formula (12) shows that Felasticmodulus=5.396>F0.054,17=2.96 and FPoisson′sratio=6.073>F0.054,17=2.96. And the R2 of the elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio are 0.913 and 0.936. This shows that the regression equations of the rock elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio are significant, and the linear relationships between rock mechanical parameters and mineral compositions are highly accurate, which can be used as an effective result.According to the relationship between the elastic modulus, Poisson’s ratio, and rock mineral composition, the elastic parameter method is introduced to analyze rock brittleness, and the following formula is obtained after substitution:(15)BRIT=1237.6374+20.1992xquartz−38.5568xcalcite+9.5781xanalcite−60.0874xsiderite−68.1563xclay−EminEmax−Emin+0.2472−0.0714xquartz+0.0911xclacite+0.0813xdolomite+0.154xclay−νmaxνmin−νmax×100.Formula (15) is the rock local brittleness evaluation model in Block A of Liaohe Oilfield. This model quantitatively establishes the relationship between the mineral composition in rock and the local brittleness, taking into account the actual reservoir environment and the influence of different mineral components on the development of natural fractures.As shown in Figure10, it can be found that the brittleness trend of different calculation methods is basically the same, which compared the rock brittleness calculated by mineral composition analysis method, elastic parameter method, and the new method. However, the rock mineral analysis method lacks quantitative characterization of mineral composition, and its calculated brittleness index is seriously low, which is quite different from the actual situation in the field. The difference of brittleness variation calculated by the elastic parameter method is large, which leads to great calculation errors. In this paper, the trend of the brittleness index of the new calculation method is the same as that of the elastic parameter method. However, considering the effect of different mineral compositions on reservoir brittleness, the calculation results are more precise and the calculation error of elastic parameter method is reduced. The calculation results are more in line with the actual situation of the study block.Figure 10
Brittleness results under different calculation methods.


## 5. Conclusion

(1)
In this paper, the fracture states of the shale core at different times are observed by CT scanning tests. The results show that with the increase of time, local microfractures are first formed in the core. While the microfractures grow longer, new microfractures are formed elsewhere. Until a large number of microfractures intersect and communicate with each other, eventually leading to core instability and fracture. Therefore, it can be seen that the rock macrofractures are the appearance of local fractures after reaching a certain degree, and the local fractures are the fundamental cause of macrofractures(2)
The stepwise regression analysis method is used to quantitatively analyze the relationships between the rock elastic modulus, Poisson’s ratio, and rock mineral compositions combined with the environment of the Liaohe Oilfield actual reservoir, which is the basis of establishing the characterization method of local shale brittleness. A new method for characterizing shale brittleness by rock mineral compositions is established in combination with the elastic parameter method, thus realizing the characterization of local brittleness of the discrete core. This method is scientific and representative and can describe the change rule of rock local brittleness accurately(3)
The results show that quartz, calcite, siderite, analcite, and clay minerals are the main influencing factors of the rock elastic modulus. Dolomite, calcite, quartz, and clay minerals are the main influencing factors of Poisson’s ratio. Among them, quartz and analcite have a positive correlation with the elastic modulus, and calcite, dolomite, and clay minerals have a positive correlation with Poisson’s ratio. Other minerals have negative correlations(4)
It can be seen from the comparative analysis that the new method of the local brittleness index characterizes the change rule of rock brittleness from the microcosmic point of view, and the results are the same as those of the elastic parameter method. It can precisely quantify the influence of different mineral components on the reservoir brittleness, reduce the calculation errors of elastic parameter method, and avoid the low calculation results of the rock mineral analysis method. The results are more in line with the actual situation of the study block



---

*Source: 5527967-2021-08-29.xml*