# Axially Ligated Zirconium(IV) Tetraphenylporphyrin: Synthesis, Characterization, and Biological Activity

Authors: Gauri D. Bajju; Sunil Kumar Anand; Gita Devi
Journal: Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

A series of 5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphinatozirconium(IV) acetylacetonatophenolates containing different phenols as axial ligands [Zr(TPP)(Y)(X)] (TPP = 5,10.15,20-tetraphenyl-21H, 23H-porphine; Y = acac; X = different phenolates) have been synthesized and characterized by various spectrochemical studies. The complexes were also screened for antimicrobial activities. Antifungal activity of some adducts has been carried out against the fungal strain Sclerotium rolfsii. Most of the complexes have shown good antibacterial activity.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The present work is a continuation of our earlier work [1] where we have reported the synthesis of zirconium(IV) porphyrin complexes with salicylic acid and 5-sulfosalicylic acid which were made by replacing the two Cl− by the organic ligands and this was followed by a biological study on some of these compounds and in view of the interesting results obtained from such axially substituted zirconium(IV) porphyrin it is considered worthwhile to make a study of axially substituted zirconium(IV) porphyrin with phenol and its derivatives. The ability of numerous chemical modifications and the large number of different mechanisms by which porphyrins affect microbial and viral pathogens place porphyrins into a group of compounds with an outstanding potential for discovery of novel agents, procedures, and materials active against pathogenic microorganisms [2]. A variety of biological activities exhibited by porphyrins are due to the fact that natural and synthetic porphyrins have relatively low toxicityin vitro andin vivo and they possess antitumor [3, 4] and antioxidant effects [4, 5] and have a good potential for metal ions complexation. Metalloporphyrins are the basis of new antifungal, antiparasitic, and anticancer drugs because modification of the porphyrin periphery confers qualitatively a new spectrum of activities to metalloporphyrins [6–8]. Zirconium(IV) porphyrins have gained attention from global researchers due to the peculiar characteristics of this class of compounds. The peculiarity of these complexes lies in the fact that metal ion in the complexes, that is, Zr4+, has large ionic radius (72 pm for most Zr(IV) 6-coordinate complexes), which fits partly into the core of porphyrin ligand and hence shows “out of plane” geometry with additional ligands always in cis position relative to the porphyrin plane [9]. The metal ion in these complexes is oxophilic [10] and thus may show preference for carboxylate and other oxygen-bearing anionic ligands. A lot of work is reported on the complexes of zirconium(IV) phthalocyanines [11–13] but comparatively less work has been done on zirconium(IV) porphyrin complexes with phenol as axial ligand [14, 15]. With this background in mind we reported herein the synthesis, spectroscopic characterization, and biological studies of a series of new axially substituted zirconium(IV) porphyrin with phenol and its derivatives as axial ligands.


## 2. Experiment

### 2.1. Materials and Instruments

All the chemicals were of analytical grade and used as received unless otherwise noted. Pyrrole was distilled over potassium hydroxide pellets under vacuum prior to use. All the organic solvents that were used for the synthesis and for chromatographic separations were dried before use. UV-vis spectra were recorded on a T90+ UV/VIS spectrophotometer in the range of 350–700 nm. The oscillator strength (f) of the transitions in absorption spectra was calculated from the expression
(1)f=4.33×10-9εΔν1/2,
where ε is the molar absorption coefficient in dm3 mol−1 cm−1 and Δν1/2 is the full width at half maximum in cm−1. Infrared spectra were recorded on a PerkinElmer spectrum 400 FTIR spectrophotometer using KBr pellets in the range of 4000–400 cm−1. The elemental analysis was performed on Elemental Analyser CHNS-932, LECO, USA, at a temperature of about 1000°C using helium as carrier gas and oxygen for combustion. The ESI mass spectroscopy was recorded at room temperature and methanol was used as solvent. The 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance II 500 (500 MHz) using tetramethylsilane as internal standard and CDCl3 as solvent. Fluorescence measurements were performed on Synergy MX BIOTEK multimode reader. The solution of porphyrins prepared in DMSO was 10−6 M.


### 2.2. Biological Studies

#### 2.2.1. Antibacterial Studies

Qualitative analysis for screening of antibacterial activity was carried out by agar-well diffusion method [16] with modifications. By measuring the inhibition zone in mm, the test compounds were taken at a concentration of 0.1 μM using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as solvent. Chloramphenicol was used as positive control for antibacterial activity. The compound was tested against four gram positive bacteria (Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, andEnterococcus faecalis) and four gram negative bacteria (Klebsiella pneumonia, Alcaligenes denitrificans, Campylobacter, andMicrococcus luteus). 20 mL of sterilized nutrient agar was inoculated with 100 μL of bacterial suspension (108 CFU/mL) and then poured on to sterilized Petri plate. The agar plate was left to solidify at room temperature. A well of 4 mm was aseptically bored into the agar plate. Then, 20 μL of the complexes (diluted with DMSO) was added in each well. The plates were kept at 4°C for 2 hours to allow the dispersal and then incubated at 37°C for 24 hour.


#### 2.2.2. Antifungal Study

The antifungal activity of some adducts was tested against the pathogenic fungusSclerotium rolfsii by poisoned food technique using potato dextrose agar (PDA) nutrient as the medium [17]. The linear growth of the fungus in controlled manner was recorded at different concentration of the adducts. The growth inhibition ofSclerotium rolfsii over control was calculated (Table 7). The growth inhibition of fungus over control was calculated as
(2)%inhibition(I)=C-TC×100,
where I is percent inhibition, C is mean growth of fungus (in mm) in control, and T is mean growth of fungus (in mm) in treatment.


### 2.3. Synthesis of Axially Ligated Zirconium(IV) Porphyrins Complexes

#### 2.3.1. Meso-5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrin [H2TPP]

The H2TPP was prepared by refluxing benzaldehyde and pyrrole in propionic acid by following reported literature method [18] with modification.


#### 2.3.2. Synthesis of Axially Ligated Zr(IV) Porphyrins: [Zr(TPP)(Y)(X)]

A mixture of Zr(acac)4 (1.87 mmol), meso-tetraphenylporphyrin (3.74 mmol), and respective phenol (0.12 mmol) with constant stirring refluxed for about 50–60 minutes (Scheme 1). The reaction course was monitored by absorption spectra of the reaction mixture. After concentration, the mixture was dissolved in minimum quantity of CHCl3 and extracted with 2N NaOH solution to remove excess phenols. The lower layer containing compound in CHCl3was collected and then it was filtered through anhydrous Na2SO4 in order to remove water and chromatographed through basic alumina using chloroform as an eluent and recrystallized from dichloromethane-hexane solution (1 : 1). The same procedure was applied for the synthesis of all axially ligated zirconium porphyrin complexes as described above. The purified axially ligated zirconium porphyrin complexes were obtained in yields of 35–40%.Scheme 1
General synthetic route for the synthesis of axially ligated Zr(IV) porphyrins complexes.Zr(TPP)(acac)(Oph). Red solid; Anal. Calcd. for C55H40N4O3Zr: C 73.71, H 4.50, N 6.25; found: C 73.26, H 4.45, N 6.83; MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. for C55H40N4O3Zr: 896.16; found 897.31 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 473 cm−1 (νZr–N).Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NH
2
phO). Yellow solid; Anal. Calcd. For C55H41N5O3Zr: C 72.50, H 4.54, N 7.69; found: C 72.62, H 4.52, N 7.62; MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. for C55H41N5O3Zr: 911.17; found 912.01 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 460 cm−1 (νZr–N).Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH
3
phO). Red solid; Anal. Calcd. for C56H42N4O4Zr: C 72.62, H 4.57, N 6.05; found: C 71.23, H 4.96, N 5.62; ESI-MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. for C56H42N4O2Zr: 926.18; found 927.34 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 481 cm−1 (νZr–N).Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH
3
phO). Red solid; Anal. Calcd. for C56H42N4O3Zr: C 73.90, H 4.65, N 6.16; found: C 73.65, H 4.88, N 5.42; ESI-MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. for C56H42N4O3Zr: 910.18; found 911.25 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 468 cm−1 (νZr–N).Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-ClphO). Brown solid; Anal. Calcd. for C55H39ClN4O3Zr: C 70.99, H 4.22, N 6.02; found: C 71.66, H 4.81, N 5.64; ESI-MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. for C55H39ClN4O3Zr: 930.61; found 931.52 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 475 cm−1 (νZr–N).Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO
2
phO). Brown solid; Anal. Calcd. for C55H39N5O5Zr: C 70.19, H 4.18, N 7.44; found: C 70.23, H 4.12, N 7.56; ESI-MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. for C51H32N4O3Zr: 941.15; found 942.05 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 484 cm−1 (νZr–N).Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-Cl
2
phO). Yellow solid; Anal. Calcd. for C55H38N4O3Cl2Zr: C 68.45, H 3.97, N 5.81; found: C 68.31, H 3.52, N 5.43; ESI-MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. For C55H38N4O3Cl2Zr: 965.05; found 966.19 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 480 cm−1 (νZr–N).Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-(NO
2
)
2
phO). Red solid; Anal. Calcd. for C55H38N6O7Zr: C 66.99, H 3.88, N 8.52; found: C 67.87, H 3.36, N 8.61; ESI-MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. for C55H38N6O7Zr: 986.15; found 987.18 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 478 cm−1 (νZr–N).Zr(TPP)(acac)(α-naphtholate). Reddish brown solid; Anal. Calcd. for C59H42N4O3Zr: C 74.89, H 4.47, N 5.92; found: C 74.83, H 4.41, N 5.95; MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. for C59H42N4O3Zr: 946.21; found 947.32 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 473 cm−1 (νZr–N).


## 2.1. Materials and Instruments

All the chemicals were of analytical grade and used as received unless otherwise noted. Pyrrole was distilled over potassium hydroxide pellets under vacuum prior to use. All the organic solvents that were used for the synthesis and for chromatographic separations were dried before use. UV-vis spectra were recorded on a T90+ UV/VIS spectrophotometer in the range of 350–700 nm. The oscillator strength (f) of the transitions in absorption spectra was calculated from the expression
(1)f=4.33×10-9εΔν1/2,
where ε is the molar absorption coefficient in dm3 mol−1 cm−1 and Δν1/2 is the full width at half maximum in cm−1. Infrared spectra were recorded on a PerkinElmer spectrum 400 FTIR spectrophotometer using KBr pellets in the range of 4000–400 cm−1. The elemental analysis was performed on Elemental Analyser CHNS-932, LECO, USA, at a temperature of about 1000°C using helium as carrier gas and oxygen for combustion. The ESI mass spectroscopy was recorded at room temperature and methanol was used as solvent. The 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance II 500 (500 MHz) using tetramethylsilane as internal standard and CDCl3 as solvent. Fluorescence measurements were performed on Synergy MX BIOTEK multimode reader. The solution of porphyrins prepared in DMSO was 10−6 M.


## 2.2. Biological Studies

### 2.2.1. Antibacterial Studies

Qualitative analysis for screening of antibacterial activity was carried out by agar-well diffusion method [16] with modifications. By measuring the inhibition zone in mm, the test compounds were taken at a concentration of 0.1 μM using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as solvent. Chloramphenicol was used as positive control for antibacterial activity. The compound was tested against four gram positive bacteria (Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, andEnterococcus faecalis) and four gram negative bacteria (Klebsiella pneumonia, Alcaligenes denitrificans, Campylobacter, andMicrococcus luteus). 20 mL of sterilized nutrient agar was inoculated with 100 μL of bacterial suspension (108 CFU/mL) and then poured on to sterilized Petri plate. The agar plate was left to solidify at room temperature. A well of 4 mm was aseptically bored into the agar plate. Then, 20 μL of the complexes (diluted with DMSO) was added in each well. The plates were kept at 4°C for 2 hours to allow the dispersal and then incubated at 37°C for 24 hour.


### 2.2.2. Antifungal Study

The antifungal activity of some adducts was tested against the pathogenic fungusSclerotium rolfsii by poisoned food technique using potato dextrose agar (PDA) nutrient as the medium [17]. The linear growth of the fungus in controlled manner was recorded at different concentration of the adducts. The growth inhibition ofSclerotium rolfsii over control was calculated (Table 7). The growth inhibition of fungus over control was calculated as
(2)%inhibition(I)=C-TC×100,
where I is percent inhibition, C is mean growth of fungus (in mm) in control, and T is mean growth of fungus (in mm) in treatment.


## 2.2.1. Antibacterial Studies

Qualitative analysis for screening of antibacterial activity was carried out by agar-well diffusion method [16] with modifications. By measuring the inhibition zone in mm, the test compounds were taken at a concentration of 0.1 μM using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as solvent. Chloramphenicol was used as positive control for antibacterial activity. The compound was tested against four gram positive bacteria (Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, andEnterococcus faecalis) and four gram negative bacteria (Klebsiella pneumonia, Alcaligenes denitrificans, Campylobacter, andMicrococcus luteus). 20 mL of sterilized nutrient agar was inoculated with 100 μL of bacterial suspension (108 CFU/mL) and then poured on to sterilized Petri plate. The agar plate was left to solidify at room temperature. A well of 4 mm was aseptically bored into the agar plate. Then, 20 μL of the complexes (diluted with DMSO) was added in each well. The plates were kept at 4°C for 2 hours to allow the dispersal and then incubated at 37°C for 24 hour.


## 2.2.2. Antifungal Study

The antifungal activity of some adducts was tested against the pathogenic fungusSclerotium rolfsii by poisoned food technique using potato dextrose agar (PDA) nutrient as the medium [17]. The linear growth of the fungus in controlled manner was recorded at different concentration of the adducts. The growth inhibition ofSclerotium rolfsii over control was calculated (Table 7). The growth inhibition of fungus over control was calculated as
(2)%inhibition(I)=C-TC×100,
where I is percent inhibition, C is mean growth of fungus (in mm) in control, and T is mean growth of fungus (in mm) in treatment.


## 2.3. Synthesis of Axially Ligated Zirconium(IV) Porphyrins Complexes

### 2.3.1. Meso-5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrin [H2TPP]

The H2TPP was prepared by refluxing benzaldehyde and pyrrole in propionic acid by following reported literature method [18] with modification.


### 2.3.2. Synthesis of Axially Ligated Zr(IV) Porphyrins: [Zr(TPP)(Y)(X)]

A mixture of Zr(acac)4 (1.87 mmol), meso-tetraphenylporphyrin (3.74 mmol), and respective phenol (0.12 mmol) with constant stirring refluxed for about 50–60 minutes (Scheme 1). The reaction course was monitored by absorption spectra of the reaction mixture. After concentration, the mixture was dissolved in minimum quantity of CHCl3 and extracted with 2N NaOH solution to remove excess phenols. The lower layer containing compound in CHCl3was collected and then it was filtered through anhydrous Na2SO4 in order to remove water and chromatographed through basic alumina using chloroform as an eluent and recrystallized from dichloromethane-hexane solution (1 : 1). The same procedure was applied for the synthesis of all axially ligated zirconium porphyrin complexes as described above. The purified axially ligated zirconium porphyrin complexes were obtained in yields of 35–40%.Scheme 1
General synthetic route for the synthesis of axially ligated Zr(IV) porphyrins complexes.Zr(TPP)(acac)(Oph). Red solid; Anal. Calcd. for C55H40N4O3Zr: C 73.71, H 4.50, N 6.25; found: C 73.26, H 4.45, N 6.83; MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. for C55H40N4O3Zr: 896.16; found 897.31 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 473 cm−1 (νZr–N).Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NH
2
phO). Yellow solid; Anal. Calcd. For C55H41N5O3Zr: C 72.50, H 4.54, N 7.69; found: C 72.62, H 4.52, N 7.62; MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. for C55H41N5O3Zr: 911.17; found 912.01 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 460 cm−1 (νZr–N).Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH
3
phO). Red solid; Anal. Calcd. for C56H42N4O4Zr: C 72.62, H 4.57, N 6.05; found: C 71.23, H 4.96, N 5.62; ESI-MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. for C56H42N4O2Zr: 926.18; found 927.34 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 481 cm−1 (νZr–N).Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH
3
phO). Red solid; Anal. Calcd. for C56H42N4O3Zr: C 73.90, H 4.65, N 6.16; found: C 73.65, H 4.88, N 5.42; ESI-MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. for C56H42N4O3Zr: 910.18; found 911.25 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 468 cm−1 (νZr–N).Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-ClphO). Brown solid; Anal. Calcd. for C55H39ClN4O3Zr: C 70.99, H 4.22, N 6.02; found: C 71.66, H 4.81, N 5.64; ESI-MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. for C55H39ClN4O3Zr: 930.61; found 931.52 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 475 cm−1 (νZr–N).Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO
2
phO). Brown solid; Anal. Calcd. for C55H39N5O5Zr: C 70.19, H 4.18, N 7.44; found: C 70.23, H 4.12, N 7.56; ESI-MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. for C51H32N4O3Zr: 941.15; found 942.05 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 484 cm−1 (νZr–N).Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-Cl
2
phO). Yellow solid; Anal. Calcd. for C55H38N4O3Cl2Zr: C 68.45, H 3.97, N 5.81; found: C 68.31, H 3.52, N 5.43; ESI-MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. For C55H38N4O3Cl2Zr: 965.05; found 966.19 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 480 cm−1 (νZr–N).Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-(NO
2
)
2
phO). Red solid; Anal. Calcd. for C55H38N6O7Zr: C 66.99, H 3.88, N 8.52; found: C 67.87, H 3.36, N 8.61; ESI-MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. for C55H38N6O7Zr: 986.15; found 987.18 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 478 cm−1 (νZr–N).Zr(TPP)(acac)(α-naphtholate). Reddish brown solid; Anal. Calcd. for C59H42N4O3Zr: C 74.89, H 4.47, N 5.92; found: C 74.83, H 4.41, N 5.95; MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. for C59H42N4O3Zr: 946.21; found 947.32 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 473 cm−1 (νZr–N).


## 2.3.1. Meso-5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrin [H2TPP]

The H2TPP was prepared by refluxing benzaldehyde and pyrrole in propionic acid by following reported literature method [18] with modification.


## 2.3.2. Synthesis of Axially Ligated Zr(IV) Porphyrins: [Zr(TPP)(Y)(X)]

A mixture of Zr(acac)4 (1.87 mmol), meso-tetraphenylporphyrin (3.74 mmol), and respective phenol (0.12 mmol) with constant stirring refluxed for about 50–60 minutes (Scheme 1). The reaction course was monitored by absorption spectra of the reaction mixture. After concentration, the mixture was dissolved in minimum quantity of CHCl3 and extracted with 2N NaOH solution to remove excess phenols. The lower layer containing compound in CHCl3was collected and then it was filtered through anhydrous Na2SO4 in order to remove water and chromatographed through basic alumina using chloroform as an eluent and recrystallized from dichloromethane-hexane solution (1 : 1). The same procedure was applied for the synthesis of all axially ligated zirconium porphyrin complexes as described above. The purified axially ligated zirconium porphyrin complexes were obtained in yields of 35–40%.Scheme 1
General synthetic route for the synthesis of axially ligated Zr(IV) porphyrins complexes.Zr(TPP)(acac)(Oph). Red solid; Anal. Calcd. for C55H40N4O3Zr: C 73.71, H 4.50, N 6.25; found: C 73.26, H 4.45, N 6.83; MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. for C55H40N4O3Zr: 896.16; found 897.31 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 473 cm−1 (νZr–N).Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NH
2
phO). Yellow solid; Anal. Calcd. For C55H41N5O3Zr: C 72.50, H 4.54, N 7.69; found: C 72.62, H 4.52, N 7.62; MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. for C55H41N5O3Zr: 911.17; found 912.01 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 460 cm−1 (νZr–N).Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH
3
phO). Red solid; Anal. Calcd. for C56H42N4O4Zr: C 72.62, H 4.57, N 6.05; found: C 71.23, H 4.96, N 5.62; ESI-MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. for C56H42N4O2Zr: 926.18; found 927.34 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 481 cm−1 (νZr–N).Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH
3
phO). Red solid; Anal. Calcd. for C56H42N4O3Zr: C 73.90, H 4.65, N 6.16; found: C 73.65, H 4.88, N 5.42; ESI-MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. for C56H42N4O3Zr: 910.18; found 911.25 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 468 cm−1 (νZr–N).Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-ClphO). Brown solid; Anal. Calcd. for C55H39ClN4O3Zr: C 70.99, H 4.22, N 6.02; found: C 71.66, H 4.81, N 5.64; ESI-MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. for C55H39ClN4O3Zr: 930.61; found 931.52 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 475 cm−1 (νZr–N).Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO
2
phO). Brown solid; Anal. Calcd. for C55H39N5O5Zr: C 70.19, H 4.18, N 7.44; found: C 70.23, H 4.12, N 7.56; ESI-MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. for C51H32N4O3Zr: 941.15; found 942.05 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 484 cm−1 (νZr–N).Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-Cl
2
phO). Yellow solid; Anal. Calcd. for C55H38N4O3Cl2Zr: C 68.45, H 3.97, N 5.81; found: C 68.31, H 3.52, N 5.43; ESI-MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. For C55H38N4O3Cl2Zr: 965.05; found 966.19 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 480 cm−1 (νZr–N).Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-(NO
2
)
2
phO). Red solid; Anal. Calcd. for C55H38N6O7Zr: C 66.99, H 3.88, N 8.52; found: C 67.87, H 3.36, N 8.61; ESI-MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. for C55H38N6O7Zr: 986.15; found 987.18 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 478 cm−1 (νZr–N).Zr(TPP)(acac)(α-naphtholate). Reddish brown solid; Anal. Calcd. for C59H42N4O3Zr: C 74.89, H 4.47, N 5.92; found: C 74.83, H 4.41, N 5.95; MS (CH3OH):m/z calcd. for C59H42N4O3Zr: 946.21; found 947.32 ([M+H]+); IR (KBr)νmax⁡: 473 cm−1 (νZr–N).


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Synthesis and Characterization

The general synthetic route to axially ligated zirconium(IV) porphyrins is shown in Scheme1. All of these new zirconium(IV) porphyrins were purified by column chromatography with aluminum oxide as adsorbent and were characterized by spectral data (UV-visible spectroscopy, IR spectroscopy, 1H NMR spectroscopy, mass spectral data, and elemental analysis). The characterization data of the new compounds are consistent with the assigned formula. All the synthesized complexes are water insoluble.


#### 3.1.1. Spectral Analysis of Zr(TPP)(Y)(X)

The spectral data of the synthesized complexes (Table1) revealed that the axially ligated Zr(IV) metal derivatives of porphyrin with different phenolates as an axial ligand showed hypsochromic shift (blue shift) and variation in intensities of absorption bands when compared to their respective free base porphyrin, due to incorporation of the metal ion along with phenolate in the porphyrin rings [1, 19]. The complexes with electron donating groups in phenolates have slightly red shifted B- and Q-bands while those having electron withdrawing groups in phenolates have blue shifted B and Q bands. When the optical absorption spectra of the compounds of Zr(TPP)(Y)(X) were recorded in different solvents (Figure 1) only a marginal change in λmax⁡ values, absorption coefficient (ε), and oscillator strength (f) values was observed. Data revealed that a change in polarity of the solvent results in slight change in the position of transitions but there was a significant increase in ν1/2 and “f” values of transitions by increasing the polarity of the solvent (Table 2). The magnitude of change in “f” value in axially ligated Zr(IV) metal derivatives of porphyrin revealed the relative strength of π-π* interactions. It was also found that, with the increase in polarity of the solvents, B and Q-bands in axially ligated Zr(IV) metal derivatives showed red shift with progressive broadening of bands indicating that the magnitude of red shift of B and Q bands depends on the nature of the solvent used.Table 1
Optical absorption data of   Zr(TPP)(Y)(X) complexes in CHCl3.
Compounds
B-bands λmax⁡ (nm), (log⁡ε)
Q-bands λmax⁡(nm), (log⁡ε)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(Oph)
413.1, (5.074)
500.5, (4.183)535.7, (4.796) 579.9, (5.009)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO)
414.2, (5.101)
501.5, (4.197)536.8, (4.812) 580.9, (5.031)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH3phO)
413.9, (5.104)
501.7, (4.200)537.4, (4.814) 581.4, (5.033)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO)
412.9, (5.056)
501.4, (4.168)535.1, (4.788) 580.8, (4.990)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-ClphO)
413.3, (5.068)
500.8, (4.177)536.1, (4.795) 580.2, (5.005)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NH2phO)
415.1, (5.119)
502.9, (4.214)538.9, (4.828) 583.5, (5.049)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-Cl2phO)
411.8, (5.061)
499.2, (4.172)534.3, (4.793) 578.8, (4.997)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-(NO2)2phO)
410.9, (5.049)
498.5, (4.159)532.9, (4.781) 578.3, (4.472)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(α-naphtholate)
412.8, (5.068)
500.3, (4.178)535.4, (4.795) 579.7, (5.007)Table 2
Optical absorption data of Zr(TPP)(Y)(X) in different  solvents.
Compounds
Solvent
λ
max
⁡ (nm), log⁡ε (M−1 cm−1)
ν
1
/
2 (cm−1)
Q
(
0
,
0
) f
B
(
0,0
)
Q
(
2,0
)
Q
(
1,0
)
Q
(
0,0
)
B
(
0,0
)
Q
(
0,0
)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(phO)
Acetone
413.1
500.5
535.7
579.9
1309.3
1067.2
0.235887
5.074
4.183
4.796
5.009
CH2Cl2
409.4
496.3
532.2
575.8
1241.6
1020.7
0.197404
5.030
4.126
4.721
4.951
CHCl3
411.3
498.5
533.4
577.5
1278.1
1041.1
0.207468
5.042
4.139
4.735
4.964
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO)
Acetone
414.2
501.5
536.8
580.9
1340.2
1085.9
0.252492
5.101
4.197
4.812
5.031
CH2Cl2
409.8
496.4
530.6
574.9
1279.9
1039.3
0.207586
5.057
4.172
4.749
4.965
CHCl3
411.9
498.3
534.2
578.5
1312.6
1062.4
0.213671
5.063
4.178
4.765
4.968
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH3phO)
Acetone
412.9
501.4
535.1
580.8
1270.3
1035.2
0.219019
5.056
4.168
4.788
4.990
CH2Cl2
409.7
496.3
532.3
576.4
1218.3
992.6
0.183752
5.002
4.131
4.718
4.932
CHCl3
411.2
499.1
533.8
577.9
1236.8
1007.9
0.194033
5.012
4.147
4.729
4.949
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO)
Acetone
410.9
500.2
536.1
582.5
1271.2
1033.2
0.256245
5.050
4.156
4.728
4.901
CH2Cl2
408.6
495.2
531.5
576.3
1218.1
991.3
0.191456
5.010
4.111
4.513
4.899
CHCl3
410.1
498.9
537.6
577.7
1235.9
1006.7
0.198565
5.006
4.124
4.279
4.999
Zr(TPP)(acac)(α-naphtholate)
Acetone
413.5
500.4
535.2
581.9
1272.3
1034.2
0.232365
5.045
4.116
4.718
4.912
CH2Cl2
411.5
497.8
535.6
577.6
1217.3
9956
0.182536
5.013
4.113
4.518
4.922
CHCl3
413.5
498.3
535.8
578.9
1235.8
1005.3
0.195632
5.102
4.127
4.739
4.948UV-vis spectra of Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO) in different solvent (—— Acetone, – – – CHCl3, …… CH2Cl2).
(a)
Q
-bands
(b)
B-bandsBy comparing the infrared spectral data of H2TPP and its corresponding axially ligated Zr(TPP)(Y)(X) (Table 3), it is found that the band at 3447 cm−1 in H2TPP assigned to ν(N–H) (pyrrole) stretching vibration was disappeared in metallated complexes and the characteristic ν(Zr–N) vibration frequency found at ~500–430 cm−1, which indicated the formation of zirconium(IV) porphyrin compounds [20, 21]. In the spectra of all the axially ligated zirconium(IV) porphyrin complexes the incorporation of various phenolates in Zr(IV) metal derivatives of porphyrin, that is, Zr(TPP)(Y)(X), was confirmed by the appearance of Zr–O vibrational frequencies in the range of 649–680 cm−1indicating the coordination of phenolic oxygen to the metal via deprotonation (Figure 2). Also, the incorporation of acetylacetonate (acac) in axially ligated Zr(IV) derivatives was confirmed by the appearance of C=O vibrational frequencies in the range of 1622–1641 cm−1 and Zr–O in the range of 702–819 cm−1 corresponding to the ligation of zirconium to oxygen of phenolic and carboxylic groups, respectively [22, 23]. Thus, the zirconium atom in the centre of porphyrin ring coordinates with the acetylacetonate and phenol group axially to form seven-coordinate complex of Zr(IV) porphyrin.Table 3
Main vibrational frequencies of axially ligated Zr(IV) porphyrin complexes.
Porphyrin
ν(N–H) (cm−1)
ν(C=C)  (cm−1)
ν(Zr–N)  (cm−1)
ν(Zr–O) phenolate (cm−1)
ν(CH3)  (cm−1)
ν(OCH3)  (cm−1)
ν(NH2)  (cm−1)
ν(NO2)  (cm−1)
ν(C–Cl)  (cm−1)
ν(Zr–O) acac (cm−1)
ν(C=O)  acac  (cm−1)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(Oph)
—
1590
473
664
2907
—
—
—
—
703803
1622
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NH2phO)
—
1592
460
655
2891
—
ν(NH2)sym = 3292 ν(NH2)asym = 3366
—
—
712804
1623
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO)
—
1590
481
653
2894
ν(C–H) = 2817 ν(COC)sym  = 1025 ν(COC)asym   = 1261
—
—
—
702802
1631
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH3phO)
—
1584
468
651
2895
—
—
—
—
702803
1630
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-ClphO)
—
1591
475
666
2906
—
—
—
783
704813
1634
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO)
—
1592
484
667
2909
—
—
13421543
—
713810
1636
Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-Cl2phO)
—
1595
480
669
2907
—
—
—
788
716804
1625
Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-(NO2)2phO)
—
1596
478
668
2905
—
—
—
789
705804
1639
Zr(TPP)(acac)(α-naphtholate)
—
1589
473
659
2897
—
—
—
—
709806
1632Figure 2
Infrared spectrum of Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO).From the1H NMR data of axially ligated zirconium(IV) porphyrin complexes in CDCl3at 298 K (Table 4), it is found that the N–H protons of H2TPP appear at −2.77 ppm. In all the zirconium(IV) porphyrins there were absence of signal related to N–H protons and shift in other signals indicating the insertion of zirconium in porphyrin macrocycle [21]. Generally, the presence of Zr(IV) metal in the porphyrin ring shifts the resonances of the porphyrin’s protons to downfield accompanied by marginal changes in the pattern. One of the important features of axially ligated Zr(IV) derivatives of porphyrins is that the metal is almost out of the plane of the porphyrin ring responsible for the production of asymmetric environment above and below the plane of the macrocycle which ultimately account for the pronounced no-equivalence of the orthoprotons of the phenyl rings.Table 4
1H NMR data of Zr(TPP)(Y)(X) in CDCl3.
Porphyrins
Imino protons
β-Pyrrole protons
Meso-aryl protons
acac protons
Phenolate protons
Zr(TPP)(acac)(phO)
—
8.94 (s)
8.26 (d, 4H, Ho)7.79 (d, 4H, Ho)  7.68–7.79 (m, 12H, Hm, p)
1.46 (s, 6H,HCH3)  4.56 (s, H, HCH)
7.04 (d, 2H, Ho)7.14–7.27 (m, 3H, Hm, p)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NH2phO)
—
8.42 (s)
7.45 (d, 4H, Ho)7.28 (d, 4H, Ho)  7.11–7.19 (m, 12H, Hm, p)
1.52 (s, 6H,HCH3)  3.85 (s, H, HCH)
6.87 (d, 2H, Ho)6.71 (d, 2H, Hm)  4.85 (s, 2H, HNH)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO)
—
8.47 (s)
7.50 (d, 4H, Ho)7.40 (d, 4H, Ho)  7.16–7.24 (m, 12H, Hm, p)
1.55 (s, 6H,HCH3)3.89 (s, H, HCH)
6.98 (m, 4H, Ho, m)3.43 (s, 3H, HOCH3)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH3phO)
—
8.47 (s)
7.48 (d, 4H, Ho)7.74 (d, 4H, Ho)  7.15–7.23 (m, 12H, Hm, p)
1.50 (s, 6H,HCH3)  3.89 (s, H, HCH)
6.98 (m, 4H, Ho, m)2.18 (s, 3H, HCH3)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-ClphO)
—
9.34 (s)
8.37 (d, 4H, Ho)8.18 (d, 4H, Ho)7.83–7.92 (m, 12H, Hm, p)
1.79 (s, 6H,HCH3)  4.59 (s, H, HCH)
7.12 (d, 2H, Ho)7.36 (d, 2H, Hm)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO)
—
9.36 (s)
8.49 (d, 4H, Ho)8.21 (d, 4H, Ho)  7.88–7.97 (m, 12H, Hm, p)
1.81 (s, 6H,HCH3)  4.63 (s, H, HCH)
7.21 (d, 2H, Ho)7.42 (d, 2H, Hm)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-Cl2phO)
—
8.51 (s)
8.48 (d, 4H, Ho)8.21 (d, 4H, Ho)  7.95–8.05 (m, 12H, Hm, p)
1.80 (s, 6H,HCH3)  4.64 (s, H, HCH)
7.12 (s, 1H, Ho)7.66–7.82 (m, 2H, Hm)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-(NO2)2phO)
—
9.57 (s)
8.57 (d, 4H, Ho)8.29 (d, 4H, Ho)  8.05–8.13 (m, 12H, Hm, p)
2.11 (s, 6H,HCH3)  4.72 (s, H, HCH)
7.22 (s, 1H, Ho)7.72–7.86 (m, 2H, Hm)The signals of axial phenol and acetylacetonate fragment protons are shifted to higher field in comparison to the signals of porphyrin protons and also in comparison to proton signals of free phenol and acetylacetonate, respectively. These positions of protons show that axial ligand is under the influence ofπ-conjugated system of porphyrin macrocycle [24]. The 1H NMR data of various axially ligated Zr(IV) compounds of H2TPP revealed that the presence of electron withdrawing groups like –NO2, –Cl at paraposition of phenolate caused slight downfield shift (deshielding) and the presence of electron releasing group like −CH3, −NH2 at paraposition of phenolate caused upfield shift (shielding) of protons with respect to Zr(TPP)(acac)(Oph) which have unsubstituted phenolate as an axial ligand. This is most probably due to deshielding effect resulting from theσ-donation of electron density upon bond formation as compared to the shielding effect of the porphyrin.In the present investigation, the variation of emission properties in free base porphyrin H2TPP and some of its corresponding axially ligated Zr(IV) porphyrins has been studied (Table 5). The free base porphyrin exhibits two emission bands at 653 nm and 715 nm corresponding to Q(0,0) and Q(0,1) transitions, respectively, the intensity of the Q(0,0) being higher than the Q(0,1) transition. The axially ligated zirconium(IV) porphyrin complexes are emissive and show intraligand fluorescence comparable to other regular metalloporphyrins (Table 5). However, the emission bands of axially ligated Zr(IV) porphyrins are blue shifted compared to free base porphyrin (Figure 3). This behavior is attributed to an enhanced spin-orbit coupling induced by the presence of the heavy-atom central metals in zirconium(IV) porphyrins complexes, which leads to a more efficient intersystem crossing from the lowest porphyrin singlet excited state 1S1 (π, π*) to the corresponding triplet manifold and thus reduces the probability of fluorescent emission [25]. Thus, the excitation spectrum of fluorescence is in agreement with absorption spectrum.Table 5
Summary of the fluorescence band maxima at 23 K in DMSO.
Compound
λ
max
⁡, nm
B
(
0,0
)
Q
(
0,0
)
Q
(
0,1
)
H2TPP
450
653
715
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO)
440
609
660
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH3phO)
440
608
657
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO)
443
610
663
Zr(TPP)(acac)(α-naphtholate)
441
608
653Figure 3
S
1
→
S
0 fluorescence spectrum of Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO) in DMSO (C=10-6mol/L,λexc=515nm).Mass spectrometric characterization of Zr(TPP)(Y)(X) complexes employed ESI as soft ionization technique. The mass spectra of axial ligated zirconium(IV) porphyrins are characterized by the presence of the molecular ion peak for monomeric form followed by a degree of fragmentation when employing this technique, which suggested that axial ligand was labile (Figure4).Figure 4
Mass spectrum of Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO) in methanol.


#### 3.1.2. Biological Studies

Antibacterial activity of all the synthesized zirconium(IV) porphyrin complexes was tested against eight bacterial strains, namely,K. pneumonia, S. aureus, E. faecalis, A. denitrificans, B. cereus, M. luteus, B. subtilis, and Campylobacter (Table 6). Our results demonstrated antibacterial activity against most of the zirconium(IV) porphyrin complexes and by comparing these complexes with H2TPP we noted that introducing zirconium and axial ligand in H2TPP increased antibacterial activity. Among all the complexes studied, Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO) was found to be highly potential against all the eight bacterial strains with sensitivity ranging from 1 to 2.5 mm zone of inhibition and even more than positive control in some cases (Table 6). Zr(TPP) (acac)(α-naphtholate) was the only other complex after Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO) complex that showed antibacterial sensitivity against all the bacterial strains with zone of inhibition ranging from 1 to 1.75 mm. On comparison of the antibacterial activities of synthesized complexes, we noted that for most of the bacterial strains complexes having axial ligand with electron withdrawing group have increased antibacterial activity compared to complexes having ligand with electron donating group and also compared to complex having no substituent on axial ligand, Zr(TPP)(acac)(phO).Table 6
In vitro antibacterial evaluation of free base porphyrin and the corresponding zirconium(IV) porphyrin complexes.
PORPHYRIN
K. pneumoniae
S. aureus
E. faecalis
A. denitrificans
B. cereus
M. luteus
B. subtilis
Campylobacter
H2TPP
—
—
1
—
—
—
—
—
Zr(TPP)(acac)(phO)
—
—
1.25
—
—
—
—
—
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NH2phO)
—
—
—
1.5
—
—
—
—
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-ClphO)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.5
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO)
—
—
—
1
—
—
—
—
Zr(TPP)(acac)(α-naphtholate)
1
1.15
1.1
1.25
1.1
1.5
1.75
1
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO)
2
1
1.5
1.5
1.2
1.4
2.5
1.5
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH3phO)
1
0.7
1.7
—
0.9
—
0.7
0.7
Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-Cl2phO)
—
—
—
0.9
—
—
—
1.25
Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-(NO2)2phO)
—
1.25
1.25
—
—
2
—
1.5
Control chloramphenicol
2.5
2.1
1.4
2
—
2.25
2
2Table 7
In vitro evaluation of complexes against Sclerotium rolfsii.  Mean colony diameter of control C = 90 mm.
Name of the complex
Concentration (µg/mL)
Colony diameter (mm)
% InhibitionI=[(C-T)/C]  × 100
IC50 (µg/mL)
H2TPP
100
66
26.66
212.24
200
48
46.66
300
28
68.89
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NH2phO)
100
57
36.66
180.61
200
39
56.66
300
11
87.77
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-ClphO)
100
61
32.22
159.42
200
43
52.22
300
12
86.66
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO)
100
65
27.77
196.46
200
41
54.44
300
27
70
Zr(TPP)(acac)(α-naphtholate)
100
33
53.33
102.75
200
30
66.66
300
8
91.11
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO)
100
35
51.11
91.87
200
23
73.33
300
7
92.22
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH3phO)
100
35
61.11
26.02
200
21
77.77
300
7
92.22


#### 3.1.3. Antifungal Activity

The antifungal activity of all the synthesized zirconium porphyrin complexes was tested at different concentrations against the pathogenic fungusSclerotium rolfsii. From the results found, it has been concluded that, by increasing the concentration of the complexes ZrTPP(Y)(X), the colony diameter of the fungus decreases and hence percent inhibition increases. On doubling the concentration of the complexes, the percent inhibition also doubles, which shows linear relationship between concentration and percent inhibition. The increase in antimicrobial activity is due to faster diffusion of metal complexes as a whole through the cell membrane or due to combined activity effect of the metal and the ligand [26, 27]. It is concluded that most of the synthesized compounds showed overall good activity. However, some complexes, namely, Zr(TPP)(acac)(phO), Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-Cl2phO), and Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-(NO2)2phO), showed negligible results at given concentrations and the data for only those complexes has been provided which showed significant results (Table 7).It is interesting to note that most of the synthesized axially ligated complexes were found to be more active (IC50 = ~26–196 μg/mL) than the corresponding free base ligand (IC50= 212.24 μg/mL) with Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH3phO) appearing to be the most potent. The selectivity might be resulting from the well-established structural differences between fungal and bacterial cells, although the exact reasons remain as yet unclear [28].


## 3.1. Synthesis and Characterization

The general synthetic route to axially ligated zirconium(IV) porphyrins is shown in Scheme1. All of these new zirconium(IV) porphyrins were purified by column chromatography with aluminum oxide as adsorbent and were characterized by spectral data (UV-visible spectroscopy, IR spectroscopy, 1H NMR spectroscopy, mass spectral data, and elemental analysis). The characterization data of the new compounds are consistent with the assigned formula. All the synthesized complexes are water insoluble.


### 3.1.1. Spectral Analysis of Zr(TPP)(Y)(X)

The spectral data of the synthesized complexes (Table1) revealed that the axially ligated Zr(IV) metal derivatives of porphyrin with different phenolates as an axial ligand showed hypsochromic shift (blue shift) and variation in intensities of absorption bands when compared to their respective free base porphyrin, due to incorporation of the metal ion along with phenolate in the porphyrin rings [1, 19]. The complexes with electron donating groups in phenolates have slightly red shifted B- and Q-bands while those having electron withdrawing groups in phenolates have blue shifted B and Q bands. When the optical absorption spectra of the compounds of Zr(TPP)(Y)(X) were recorded in different solvents (Figure 1) only a marginal change in λmax⁡ values, absorption coefficient (ε), and oscillator strength (f) values was observed. Data revealed that a change in polarity of the solvent results in slight change in the position of transitions but there was a significant increase in ν1/2 and “f” values of transitions by increasing the polarity of the solvent (Table 2). The magnitude of change in “f” value in axially ligated Zr(IV) metal derivatives of porphyrin revealed the relative strength of π-π* interactions. It was also found that, with the increase in polarity of the solvents, B and Q-bands in axially ligated Zr(IV) metal derivatives showed red shift with progressive broadening of bands indicating that the magnitude of red shift of B and Q bands depends on the nature of the solvent used.Table 1
Optical absorption data of   Zr(TPP)(Y)(X) complexes in CHCl3.
Compounds
B-bands λmax⁡ (nm), (log⁡ε)
Q-bands λmax⁡(nm), (log⁡ε)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(Oph)
413.1, (5.074)
500.5, (4.183)535.7, (4.796) 579.9, (5.009)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO)
414.2, (5.101)
501.5, (4.197)536.8, (4.812) 580.9, (5.031)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH3phO)
413.9, (5.104)
501.7, (4.200)537.4, (4.814) 581.4, (5.033)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO)
412.9, (5.056)
501.4, (4.168)535.1, (4.788) 580.8, (4.990)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-ClphO)
413.3, (5.068)
500.8, (4.177)536.1, (4.795) 580.2, (5.005)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NH2phO)
415.1, (5.119)
502.9, (4.214)538.9, (4.828) 583.5, (5.049)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-Cl2phO)
411.8, (5.061)
499.2, (4.172)534.3, (4.793) 578.8, (4.997)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-(NO2)2phO)
410.9, (5.049)
498.5, (4.159)532.9, (4.781) 578.3, (4.472)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(α-naphtholate)
412.8, (5.068)
500.3, (4.178)535.4, (4.795) 579.7, (5.007)Table 2
Optical absorption data of Zr(TPP)(Y)(X) in different  solvents.
Compounds
Solvent
λ
max
⁡ (nm), log⁡ε (M−1 cm−1)
ν
1
/
2 (cm−1)
Q
(
0
,
0
) f
B
(
0,0
)
Q
(
2,0
)
Q
(
1,0
)
Q
(
0,0
)
B
(
0,0
)
Q
(
0,0
)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(phO)
Acetone
413.1
500.5
535.7
579.9
1309.3
1067.2
0.235887
5.074
4.183
4.796
5.009
CH2Cl2
409.4
496.3
532.2
575.8
1241.6
1020.7
0.197404
5.030
4.126
4.721
4.951
CHCl3
411.3
498.5
533.4
577.5
1278.1
1041.1
0.207468
5.042
4.139
4.735
4.964
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO)
Acetone
414.2
501.5
536.8
580.9
1340.2
1085.9
0.252492
5.101
4.197
4.812
5.031
CH2Cl2
409.8
496.4
530.6
574.9
1279.9
1039.3
0.207586
5.057
4.172
4.749
4.965
CHCl3
411.9
498.3
534.2
578.5
1312.6
1062.4
0.213671
5.063
4.178
4.765
4.968
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH3phO)
Acetone
412.9
501.4
535.1
580.8
1270.3
1035.2
0.219019
5.056
4.168
4.788
4.990
CH2Cl2
409.7
496.3
532.3
576.4
1218.3
992.6
0.183752
5.002
4.131
4.718
4.932
CHCl3
411.2
499.1
533.8
577.9
1236.8
1007.9
0.194033
5.012
4.147
4.729
4.949
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO)
Acetone
410.9
500.2
536.1
582.5
1271.2
1033.2
0.256245
5.050
4.156
4.728
4.901
CH2Cl2
408.6
495.2
531.5
576.3
1218.1
991.3
0.191456
5.010
4.111
4.513
4.899
CHCl3
410.1
498.9
537.6
577.7
1235.9
1006.7
0.198565
5.006
4.124
4.279
4.999
Zr(TPP)(acac)(α-naphtholate)
Acetone
413.5
500.4
535.2
581.9
1272.3
1034.2
0.232365
5.045
4.116
4.718
4.912
CH2Cl2
411.5
497.8
535.6
577.6
1217.3
9956
0.182536
5.013
4.113
4.518
4.922
CHCl3
413.5
498.3
535.8
578.9
1235.8
1005.3
0.195632
5.102
4.127
4.739
4.948UV-vis spectra of Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO) in different solvent (—— Acetone, – – – CHCl3, …… CH2Cl2).
(a)
Q
-bands
(b)
B-bandsBy comparing the infrared spectral data of H2TPP and its corresponding axially ligated Zr(TPP)(Y)(X) (Table 3), it is found that the band at 3447 cm−1 in H2TPP assigned to ν(N–H) (pyrrole) stretching vibration was disappeared in metallated complexes and the characteristic ν(Zr–N) vibration frequency found at ~500–430 cm−1, which indicated the formation of zirconium(IV) porphyrin compounds [20, 21]. In the spectra of all the axially ligated zirconium(IV) porphyrin complexes the incorporation of various phenolates in Zr(IV) metal derivatives of porphyrin, that is, Zr(TPP)(Y)(X), was confirmed by the appearance of Zr–O vibrational frequencies in the range of 649–680 cm−1indicating the coordination of phenolic oxygen to the metal via deprotonation (Figure 2). Also, the incorporation of acetylacetonate (acac) in axially ligated Zr(IV) derivatives was confirmed by the appearance of C=O vibrational frequencies in the range of 1622–1641 cm−1 and Zr–O in the range of 702–819 cm−1 corresponding to the ligation of zirconium to oxygen of phenolic and carboxylic groups, respectively [22, 23]. Thus, the zirconium atom in the centre of porphyrin ring coordinates with the acetylacetonate and phenol group axially to form seven-coordinate complex of Zr(IV) porphyrin.Table 3
Main vibrational frequencies of axially ligated Zr(IV) porphyrin complexes.
Porphyrin
ν(N–H) (cm−1)
ν(C=C)  (cm−1)
ν(Zr–N)  (cm−1)
ν(Zr–O) phenolate (cm−1)
ν(CH3)  (cm−1)
ν(OCH3)  (cm−1)
ν(NH2)  (cm−1)
ν(NO2)  (cm−1)
ν(C–Cl)  (cm−1)
ν(Zr–O) acac (cm−1)
ν(C=O)  acac  (cm−1)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(Oph)
—
1590
473
664
2907
—
—
—
—
703803
1622
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NH2phO)
—
1592
460
655
2891
—
ν(NH2)sym = 3292 ν(NH2)asym = 3366
—
—
712804
1623
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO)
—
1590
481
653
2894
ν(C–H) = 2817 ν(COC)sym  = 1025 ν(COC)asym   = 1261
—
—
—
702802
1631
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH3phO)
—
1584
468
651
2895
—
—
—
—
702803
1630
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-ClphO)
—
1591
475
666
2906
—
—
—
783
704813
1634
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO)
—
1592
484
667
2909
—
—
13421543
—
713810
1636
Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-Cl2phO)
—
1595
480
669
2907
—
—
—
788
716804
1625
Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-(NO2)2phO)
—
1596
478
668
2905
—
—
—
789
705804
1639
Zr(TPP)(acac)(α-naphtholate)
—
1589
473
659
2897
—
—
—
—
709806
1632Figure 2
Infrared spectrum of Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO).From the1H NMR data of axially ligated zirconium(IV) porphyrin complexes in CDCl3at 298 K (Table 4), it is found that the N–H protons of H2TPP appear at −2.77 ppm. In all the zirconium(IV) porphyrins there were absence of signal related to N–H protons and shift in other signals indicating the insertion of zirconium in porphyrin macrocycle [21]. Generally, the presence of Zr(IV) metal in the porphyrin ring shifts the resonances of the porphyrin’s protons to downfield accompanied by marginal changes in the pattern. One of the important features of axially ligated Zr(IV) derivatives of porphyrins is that the metal is almost out of the plane of the porphyrin ring responsible for the production of asymmetric environment above and below the plane of the macrocycle which ultimately account for the pronounced no-equivalence of the orthoprotons of the phenyl rings.Table 4
1H NMR data of Zr(TPP)(Y)(X) in CDCl3.
Porphyrins
Imino protons
β-Pyrrole protons
Meso-aryl protons
acac protons
Phenolate protons
Zr(TPP)(acac)(phO)
—
8.94 (s)
8.26 (d, 4H, Ho)7.79 (d, 4H, Ho)  7.68–7.79 (m, 12H, Hm, p)
1.46 (s, 6H,HCH3)  4.56 (s, H, HCH)
7.04 (d, 2H, Ho)7.14–7.27 (m, 3H, Hm, p)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NH2phO)
—
8.42 (s)
7.45 (d, 4H, Ho)7.28 (d, 4H, Ho)  7.11–7.19 (m, 12H, Hm, p)
1.52 (s, 6H,HCH3)  3.85 (s, H, HCH)
6.87 (d, 2H, Ho)6.71 (d, 2H, Hm)  4.85 (s, 2H, HNH)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO)
—
8.47 (s)
7.50 (d, 4H, Ho)7.40 (d, 4H, Ho)  7.16–7.24 (m, 12H, Hm, p)
1.55 (s, 6H,HCH3)3.89 (s, H, HCH)
6.98 (m, 4H, Ho, m)3.43 (s, 3H, HOCH3)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH3phO)
—
8.47 (s)
7.48 (d, 4H, Ho)7.74 (d, 4H, Ho)  7.15–7.23 (m, 12H, Hm, p)
1.50 (s, 6H,HCH3)  3.89 (s, H, HCH)
6.98 (m, 4H, Ho, m)2.18 (s, 3H, HCH3)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-ClphO)
—
9.34 (s)
8.37 (d, 4H, Ho)8.18 (d, 4H, Ho)7.83–7.92 (m, 12H, Hm, p)
1.79 (s, 6H,HCH3)  4.59 (s, H, HCH)
7.12 (d, 2H, Ho)7.36 (d, 2H, Hm)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO)
—
9.36 (s)
8.49 (d, 4H, Ho)8.21 (d, 4H, Ho)  7.88–7.97 (m, 12H, Hm, p)
1.81 (s, 6H,HCH3)  4.63 (s, H, HCH)
7.21 (d, 2H, Ho)7.42 (d, 2H, Hm)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-Cl2phO)
—
8.51 (s)
8.48 (d, 4H, Ho)8.21 (d, 4H, Ho)  7.95–8.05 (m, 12H, Hm, p)
1.80 (s, 6H,HCH3)  4.64 (s, H, HCH)
7.12 (s, 1H, Ho)7.66–7.82 (m, 2H, Hm)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-(NO2)2phO)
—
9.57 (s)
8.57 (d, 4H, Ho)8.29 (d, 4H, Ho)  8.05–8.13 (m, 12H, Hm, p)
2.11 (s, 6H,HCH3)  4.72 (s, H, HCH)
7.22 (s, 1H, Ho)7.72–7.86 (m, 2H, Hm)The signals of axial phenol and acetylacetonate fragment protons are shifted to higher field in comparison to the signals of porphyrin protons and also in comparison to proton signals of free phenol and acetylacetonate, respectively. These positions of protons show that axial ligand is under the influence ofπ-conjugated system of porphyrin macrocycle [24]. The 1H NMR data of various axially ligated Zr(IV) compounds of H2TPP revealed that the presence of electron withdrawing groups like –NO2, –Cl at paraposition of phenolate caused slight downfield shift (deshielding) and the presence of electron releasing group like −CH3, −NH2 at paraposition of phenolate caused upfield shift (shielding) of protons with respect to Zr(TPP)(acac)(Oph) which have unsubstituted phenolate as an axial ligand. This is most probably due to deshielding effect resulting from theσ-donation of electron density upon bond formation as compared to the shielding effect of the porphyrin.In the present investigation, the variation of emission properties in free base porphyrin H2TPP and some of its corresponding axially ligated Zr(IV) porphyrins has been studied (Table 5). The free base porphyrin exhibits two emission bands at 653 nm and 715 nm corresponding to Q(0,0) and Q(0,1) transitions, respectively, the intensity of the Q(0,0) being higher than the Q(0,1) transition. The axially ligated zirconium(IV) porphyrin complexes are emissive and show intraligand fluorescence comparable to other regular metalloporphyrins (Table 5). However, the emission bands of axially ligated Zr(IV) porphyrins are blue shifted compared to free base porphyrin (Figure 3). This behavior is attributed to an enhanced spin-orbit coupling induced by the presence of the heavy-atom central metals in zirconium(IV) porphyrins complexes, which leads to a more efficient intersystem crossing from the lowest porphyrin singlet excited state 1S1 (π, π*) to the corresponding triplet manifold and thus reduces the probability of fluorescent emission [25]. Thus, the excitation spectrum of fluorescence is in agreement with absorption spectrum.Table 5
Summary of the fluorescence band maxima at 23 K in DMSO.
Compound
λ
max
⁡, nm
B
(
0,0
)
Q
(
0,0
)
Q
(
0,1
)
H2TPP
450
653
715
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO)
440
609
660
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH3phO)
440
608
657
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO)
443
610
663
Zr(TPP)(acac)(α-naphtholate)
441
608
653Figure 3
S
1
→
S
0 fluorescence spectrum of Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO) in DMSO (C=10-6mol/L,λexc=515nm).Mass spectrometric characterization of Zr(TPP)(Y)(X) complexes employed ESI as soft ionization technique. The mass spectra of axial ligated zirconium(IV) porphyrins are characterized by the presence of the molecular ion peak for monomeric form followed by a degree of fragmentation when employing this technique, which suggested that axial ligand was labile (Figure4).Figure 4
Mass spectrum of Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO) in methanol.


### 3.1.2. Biological Studies

Antibacterial activity of all the synthesized zirconium(IV) porphyrin complexes was tested against eight bacterial strains, namely,K. pneumonia, S. aureus, E. faecalis, A. denitrificans, B. cereus, M. luteus, B. subtilis, and Campylobacter (Table 6). Our results demonstrated antibacterial activity against most of the zirconium(IV) porphyrin complexes and by comparing these complexes with H2TPP we noted that introducing zirconium and axial ligand in H2TPP increased antibacterial activity. Among all the complexes studied, Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO) was found to be highly potential against all the eight bacterial strains with sensitivity ranging from 1 to 2.5 mm zone of inhibition and even more than positive control in some cases (Table 6). Zr(TPP) (acac)(α-naphtholate) was the only other complex after Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO) complex that showed antibacterial sensitivity against all the bacterial strains with zone of inhibition ranging from 1 to 1.75 mm. On comparison of the antibacterial activities of synthesized complexes, we noted that for most of the bacterial strains complexes having axial ligand with electron withdrawing group have increased antibacterial activity compared to complexes having ligand with electron donating group and also compared to complex having no substituent on axial ligand, Zr(TPP)(acac)(phO).Table 6
In vitro antibacterial evaluation of free base porphyrin and the corresponding zirconium(IV) porphyrin complexes.
PORPHYRIN
K. pneumoniae
S. aureus
E. faecalis
A. denitrificans
B. cereus
M. luteus
B. subtilis
Campylobacter
H2TPP
—
—
1
—
—
—
—
—
Zr(TPP)(acac)(phO)
—
—
1.25
—
—
—
—
—
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NH2phO)
—
—
—
1.5
—
—
—
—
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-ClphO)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.5
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO)
—
—
—
1
—
—
—
—
Zr(TPP)(acac)(α-naphtholate)
1
1.15
1.1
1.25
1.1
1.5
1.75
1
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO)
2
1
1.5
1.5
1.2
1.4
2.5
1.5
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH3phO)
1
0.7
1.7
—
0.9
—
0.7
0.7
Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-Cl2phO)
—
—
—
0.9
—
—
—
1.25
Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-(NO2)2phO)
—
1.25
1.25
—
—
2
—
1.5
Control chloramphenicol
2.5
2.1
1.4
2
—
2.25
2
2Table 7
In vitro evaluation of complexes against Sclerotium rolfsii.  Mean colony diameter of control C = 90 mm.
Name of the complex
Concentration (µg/mL)
Colony diameter (mm)
% InhibitionI=[(C-T)/C]  × 100
IC50 (µg/mL)
H2TPP
100
66
26.66
212.24
200
48
46.66
300
28
68.89
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NH2phO)
100
57
36.66
180.61
200
39
56.66
300
11
87.77
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-ClphO)
100
61
32.22
159.42
200
43
52.22
300
12
86.66
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO)
100
65
27.77
196.46
200
41
54.44
300
27
70
Zr(TPP)(acac)(α-naphtholate)
100
33
53.33
102.75
200
30
66.66
300
8
91.11
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO)
100
35
51.11
91.87
200
23
73.33
300
7
92.22
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH3phO)
100
35
61.11
26.02
200
21
77.77
300
7
92.22


### 3.1.3. Antifungal Activity

The antifungal activity of all the synthesized zirconium porphyrin complexes was tested at different concentrations against the pathogenic fungusSclerotium rolfsii. From the results found, it has been concluded that, by increasing the concentration of the complexes ZrTPP(Y)(X), the colony diameter of the fungus decreases and hence percent inhibition increases. On doubling the concentration of the complexes, the percent inhibition also doubles, which shows linear relationship between concentration and percent inhibition. The increase in antimicrobial activity is due to faster diffusion of metal complexes as a whole through the cell membrane or due to combined activity effect of the metal and the ligand [26, 27]. It is concluded that most of the synthesized compounds showed overall good activity. However, some complexes, namely, Zr(TPP)(acac)(phO), Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-Cl2phO), and Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-(NO2)2phO), showed negligible results at given concentrations and the data for only those complexes has been provided which showed significant results (Table 7).It is interesting to note that most of the synthesized axially ligated complexes were found to be more active (IC50 = ~26–196 μg/mL) than the corresponding free base ligand (IC50= 212.24 μg/mL) with Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH3phO) appearing to be the most potent. The selectivity might be resulting from the well-established structural differences between fungal and bacterial cells, although the exact reasons remain as yet unclear [28].


## 3.1.1. Spectral Analysis of Zr(TPP)(Y)(X)

The spectral data of the synthesized complexes (Table1) revealed that the axially ligated Zr(IV) metal derivatives of porphyrin with different phenolates as an axial ligand showed hypsochromic shift (blue shift) and variation in intensities of absorption bands when compared to their respective free base porphyrin, due to incorporation of the metal ion along with phenolate in the porphyrin rings [1, 19]. The complexes with electron donating groups in phenolates have slightly red shifted B- and Q-bands while those having electron withdrawing groups in phenolates have blue shifted B and Q bands. When the optical absorption spectra of the compounds of Zr(TPP)(Y)(X) were recorded in different solvents (Figure 1) only a marginal change in λmax⁡ values, absorption coefficient (ε), and oscillator strength (f) values was observed. Data revealed that a change in polarity of the solvent results in slight change in the position of transitions but there was a significant increase in ν1/2 and “f” values of transitions by increasing the polarity of the solvent (Table 2). The magnitude of change in “f” value in axially ligated Zr(IV) metal derivatives of porphyrin revealed the relative strength of π-π* interactions. It was also found that, with the increase in polarity of the solvents, B and Q-bands in axially ligated Zr(IV) metal derivatives showed red shift with progressive broadening of bands indicating that the magnitude of red shift of B and Q bands depends on the nature of the solvent used.Table 1
Optical absorption data of   Zr(TPP)(Y)(X) complexes in CHCl3.
Compounds
B-bands λmax⁡ (nm), (log⁡ε)
Q-bands λmax⁡(nm), (log⁡ε)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(Oph)
413.1, (5.074)
500.5, (4.183)535.7, (4.796) 579.9, (5.009)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO)
414.2, (5.101)
501.5, (4.197)536.8, (4.812) 580.9, (5.031)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH3phO)
413.9, (5.104)
501.7, (4.200)537.4, (4.814) 581.4, (5.033)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO)
412.9, (5.056)
501.4, (4.168)535.1, (4.788) 580.8, (4.990)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-ClphO)
413.3, (5.068)
500.8, (4.177)536.1, (4.795) 580.2, (5.005)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NH2phO)
415.1, (5.119)
502.9, (4.214)538.9, (4.828) 583.5, (5.049)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-Cl2phO)
411.8, (5.061)
499.2, (4.172)534.3, (4.793) 578.8, (4.997)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-(NO2)2phO)
410.9, (5.049)
498.5, (4.159)532.9, (4.781) 578.3, (4.472)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(α-naphtholate)
412.8, (5.068)
500.3, (4.178)535.4, (4.795) 579.7, (5.007)Table 2
Optical absorption data of Zr(TPP)(Y)(X) in different  solvents.
Compounds
Solvent
λ
max
⁡ (nm), log⁡ε (M−1 cm−1)
ν
1
/
2 (cm−1)
Q
(
0
,
0
) f
B
(
0,0
)
Q
(
2,0
)
Q
(
1,0
)
Q
(
0,0
)
B
(
0,0
)
Q
(
0,0
)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(phO)
Acetone
413.1
500.5
535.7
579.9
1309.3
1067.2
0.235887
5.074
4.183
4.796
5.009
CH2Cl2
409.4
496.3
532.2
575.8
1241.6
1020.7
0.197404
5.030
4.126
4.721
4.951
CHCl3
411.3
498.5
533.4
577.5
1278.1
1041.1
0.207468
5.042
4.139
4.735
4.964
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO)
Acetone
414.2
501.5
536.8
580.9
1340.2
1085.9
0.252492
5.101
4.197
4.812
5.031
CH2Cl2
409.8
496.4
530.6
574.9
1279.9
1039.3
0.207586
5.057
4.172
4.749
4.965
CHCl3
411.9
498.3
534.2
578.5
1312.6
1062.4
0.213671
5.063
4.178
4.765
4.968
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH3phO)
Acetone
412.9
501.4
535.1
580.8
1270.3
1035.2
0.219019
5.056
4.168
4.788
4.990
CH2Cl2
409.7
496.3
532.3
576.4
1218.3
992.6
0.183752
5.002
4.131
4.718
4.932
CHCl3
411.2
499.1
533.8
577.9
1236.8
1007.9
0.194033
5.012
4.147
4.729
4.949
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO)
Acetone
410.9
500.2
536.1
582.5
1271.2
1033.2
0.256245
5.050
4.156
4.728
4.901
CH2Cl2
408.6
495.2
531.5
576.3
1218.1
991.3
0.191456
5.010
4.111
4.513
4.899
CHCl3
410.1
498.9
537.6
577.7
1235.9
1006.7
0.198565
5.006
4.124
4.279
4.999
Zr(TPP)(acac)(α-naphtholate)
Acetone
413.5
500.4
535.2
581.9
1272.3
1034.2
0.232365
5.045
4.116
4.718
4.912
CH2Cl2
411.5
497.8
535.6
577.6
1217.3
9956
0.182536
5.013
4.113
4.518
4.922
CHCl3
413.5
498.3
535.8
578.9
1235.8
1005.3
0.195632
5.102
4.127
4.739
4.948UV-vis spectra of Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO) in different solvent (—— Acetone, – – – CHCl3, …… CH2Cl2).
(a)
Q
-bands
(b)
B-bandsBy comparing the infrared spectral data of H2TPP and its corresponding axially ligated Zr(TPP)(Y)(X) (Table 3), it is found that the band at 3447 cm−1 in H2TPP assigned to ν(N–H) (pyrrole) stretching vibration was disappeared in metallated complexes and the characteristic ν(Zr–N) vibration frequency found at ~500–430 cm−1, which indicated the formation of zirconium(IV) porphyrin compounds [20, 21]. In the spectra of all the axially ligated zirconium(IV) porphyrin complexes the incorporation of various phenolates in Zr(IV) metal derivatives of porphyrin, that is, Zr(TPP)(Y)(X), was confirmed by the appearance of Zr–O vibrational frequencies in the range of 649–680 cm−1indicating the coordination of phenolic oxygen to the metal via deprotonation (Figure 2). Also, the incorporation of acetylacetonate (acac) in axially ligated Zr(IV) derivatives was confirmed by the appearance of C=O vibrational frequencies in the range of 1622–1641 cm−1 and Zr–O in the range of 702–819 cm−1 corresponding to the ligation of zirconium to oxygen of phenolic and carboxylic groups, respectively [22, 23]. Thus, the zirconium atom in the centre of porphyrin ring coordinates with the acetylacetonate and phenol group axially to form seven-coordinate complex of Zr(IV) porphyrin.Table 3
Main vibrational frequencies of axially ligated Zr(IV) porphyrin complexes.
Porphyrin
ν(N–H) (cm−1)
ν(C=C)  (cm−1)
ν(Zr–N)  (cm−1)
ν(Zr–O) phenolate (cm−1)
ν(CH3)  (cm−1)
ν(OCH3)  (cm−1)
ν(NH2)  (cm−1)
ν(NO2)  (cm−1)
ν(C–Cl)  (cm−1)
ν(Zr–O) acac (cm−1)
ν(C=O)  acac  (cm−1)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(Oph)
—
1590
473
664
2907
—
—
—
—
703803
1622
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NH2phO)
—
1592
460
655
2891
—
ν(NH2)sym = 3292 ν(NH2)asym = 3366
—
—
712804
1623
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO)
—
1590
481
653
2894
ν(C–H) = 2817 ν(COC)sym  = 1025 ν(COC)asym   = 1261
—
—
—
702802
1631
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH3phO)
—
1584
468
651
2895
—
—
—
—
702803
1630
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-ClphO)
—
1591
475
666
2906
—
—
—
783
704813
1634
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO)
—
1592
484
667
2909
—
—
13421543
—
713810
1636
Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-Cl2phO)
—
1595
480
669
2907
—
—
—
788
716804
1625
Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-(NO2)2phO)
—
1596
478
668
2905
—
—
—
789
705804
1639
Zr(TPP)(acac)(α-naphtholate)
—
1589
473
659
2897
—
—
—
—
709806
1632Figure 2
Infrared spectrum of Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO).From the1H NMR data of axially ligated zirconium(IV) porphyrin complexes in CDCl3at 298 K (Table 4), it is found that the N–H protons of H2TPP appear at −2.77 ppm. In all the zirconium(IV) porphyrins there were absence of signal related to N–H protons and shift in other signals indicating the insertion of zirconium in porphyrin macrocycle [21]. Generally, the presence of Zr(IV) metal in the porphyrin ring shifts the resonances of the porphyrin’s protons to downfield accompanied by marginal changes in the pattern. One of the important features of axially ligated Zr(IV) derivatives of porphyrins is that the metal is almost out of the plane of the porphyrin ring responsible for the production of asymmetric environment above and below the plane of the macrocycle which ultimately account for the pronounced no-equivalence of the orthoprotons of the phenyl rings.Table 4
1H NMR data of Zr(TPP)(Y)(X) in CDCl3.
Porphyrins
Imino protons
β-Pyrrole protons
Meso-aryl protons
acac protons
Phenolate protons
Zr(TPP)(acac)(phO)
—
8.94 (s)
8.26 (d, 4H, Ho)7.79 (d, 4H, Ho)  7.68–7.79 (m, 12H, Hm, p)
1.46 (s, 6H,HCH3)  4.56 (s, H, HCH)
7.04 (d, 2H, Ho)7.14–7.27 (m, 3H, Hm, p)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NH2phO)
—
8.42 (s)
7.45 (d, 4H, Ho)7.28 (d, 4H, Ho)  7.11–7.19 (m, 12H, Hm, p)
1.52 (s, 6H,HCH3)  3.85 (s, H, HCH)
6.87 (d, 2H, Ho)6.71 (d, 2H, Hm)  4.85 (s, 2H, HNH)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO)
—
8.47 (s)
7.50 (d, 4H, Ho)7.40 (d, 4H, Ho)  7.16–7.24 (m, 12H, Hm, p)
1.55 (s, 6H,HCH3)3.89 (s, H, HCH)
6.98 (m, 4H, Ho, m)3.43 (s, 3H, HOCH3)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH3phO)
—
8.47 (s)
7.48 (d, 4H, Ho)7.74 (d, 4H, Ho)  7.15–7.23 (m, 12H, Hm, p)
1.50 (s, 6H,HCH3)  3.89 (s, H, HCH)
6.98 (m, 4H, Ho, m)2.18 (s, 3H, HCH3)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-ClphO)
—
9.34 (s)
8.37 (d, 4H, Ho)8.18 (d, 4H, Ho)7.83–7.92 (m, 12H, Hm, p)
1.79 (s, 6H,HCH3)  4.59 (s, H, HCH)
7.12 (d, 2H, Ho)7.36 (d, 2H, Hm)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO)
—
9.36 (s)
8.49 (d, 4H, Ho)8.21 (d, 4H, Ho)  7.88–7.97 (m, 12H, Hm, p)
1.81 (s, 6H,HCH3)  4.63 (s, H, HCH)
7.21 (d, 2H, Ho)7.42 (d, 2H, Hm)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-Cl2phO)
—
8.51 (s)
8.48 (d, 4H, Ho)8.21 (d, 4H, Ho)  7.95–8.05 (m, 12H, Hm, p)
1.80 (s, 6H,HCH3)  4.64 (s, H, HCH)
7.12 (s, 1H, Ho)7.66–7.82 (m, 2H, Hm)
Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-(NO2)2phO)
—
9.57 (s)
8.57 (d, 4H, Ho)8.29 (d, 4H, Ho)  8.05–8.13 (m, 12H, Hm, p)
2.11 (s, 6H,HCH3)  4.72 (s, H, HCH)
7.22 (s, 1H, Ho)7.72–7.86 (m, 2H, Hm)The signals of axial phenol and acetylacetonate fragment protons are shifted to higher field in comparison to the signals of porphyrin protons and also in comparison to proton signals of free phenol and acetylacetonate, respectively. These positions of protons show that axial ligand is under the influence ofπ-conjugated system of porphyrin macrocycle [24]. The 1H NMR data of various axially ligated Zr(IV) compounds of H2TPP revealed that the presence of electron withdrawing groups like –NO2, –Cl at paraposition of phenolate caused slight downfield shift (deshielding) and the presence of electron releasing group like −CH3, −NH2 at paraposition of phenolate caused upfield shift (shielding) of protons with respect to Zr(TPP)(acac)(Oph) which have unsubstituted phenolate as an axial ligand. This is most probably due to deshielding effect resulting from theσ-donation of electron density upon bond formation as compared to the shielding effect of the porphyrin.In the present investigation, the variation of emission properties in free base porphyrin H2TPP and some of its corresponding axially ligated Zr(IV) porphyrins has been studied (Table 5). The free base porphyrin exhibits two emission bands at 653 nm and 715 nm corresponding to Q(0,0) and Q(0,1) transitions, respectively, the intensity of the Q(0,0) being higher than the Q(0,1) transition. The axially ligated zirconium(IV) porphyrin complexes are emissive and show intraligand fluorescence comparable to other regular metalloporphyrins (Table 5). However, the emission bands of axially ligated Zr(IV) porphyrins are blue shifted compared to free base porphyrin (Figure 3). This behavior is attributed to an enhanced spin-orbit coupling induced by the presence of the heavy-atom central metals in zirconium(IV) porphyrins complexes, which leads to a more efficient intersystem crossing from the lowest porphyrin singlet excited state 1S1 (π, π*) to the corresponding triplet manifold and thus reduces the probability of fluorescent emission [25]. Thus, the excitation spectrum of fluorescence is in agreement with absorption spectrum.Table 5
Summary of the fluorescence band maxima at 23 K in DMSO.
Compound
λ
max
⁡, nm
B
(
0,0
)
Q
(
0,0
)
Q
(
0,1
)
H2TPP
450
653
715
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO)
440
609
660
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH3phO)
440
608
657
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO)
443
610
663
Zr(TPP)(acac)(α-naphtholate)
441
608
653Figure 3
S
1
→
S
0 fluorescence spectrum of Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO) in DMSO (C=10-6mol/L,λexc=515nm).Mass spectrometric characterization of Zr(TPP)(Y)(X) complexes employed ESI as soft ionization technique. The mass spectra of axial ligated zirconium(IV) porphyrins are characterized by the presence of the molecular ion peak for monomeric form followed by a degree of fragmentation when employing this technique, which suggested that axial ligand was labile (Figure4).Figure 4
Mass spectrum of Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO) in methanol.


## 3.1.2. Biological Studies

Antibacterial activity of all the synthesized zirconium(IV) porphyrin complexes was tested against eight bacterial strains, namely,K. pneumonia, S. aureus, E. faecalis, A. denitrificans, B. cereus, M. luteus, B. subtilis, and Campylobacter (Table 6). Our results demonstrated antibacterial activity against most of the zirconium(IV) porphyrin complexes and by comparing these complexes with H2TPP we noted that introducing zirconium and axial ligand in H2TPP increased antibacterial activity. Among all the complexes studied, Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO) was found to be highly potential against all the eight bacterial strains with sensitivity ranging from 1 to 2.5 mm zone of inhibition and even more than positive control in some cases (Table 6). Zr(TPP) (acac)(α-naphtholate) was the only other complex after Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO) complex that showed antibacterial sensitivity against all the bacterial strains with zone of inhibition ranging from 1 to 1.75 mm. On comparison of the antibacterial activities of synthesized complexes, we noted that for most of the bacterial strains complexes having axial ligand with electron withdrawing group have increased antibacterial activity compared to complexes having ligand with electron donating group and also compared to complex having no substituent on axial ligand, Zr(TPP)(acac)(phO).Table 6
In vitro antibacterial evaluation of free base porphyrin and the corresponding zirconium(IV) porphyrin complexes.
PORPHYRIN
K. pneumoniae
S. aureus
E. faecalis
A. denitrificans
B. cereus
M. luteus
B. subtilis
Campylobacter
H2TPP
—
—
1
—
—
—
—
—
Zr(TPP)(acac)(phO)
—
—
1.25
—
—
—
—
—
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NH2phO)
—
—
—
1.5
—
—
—
—
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-ClphO)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.5
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO)
—
—
—
1
—
—
—
—
Zr(TPP)(acac)(α-naphtholate)
1
1.15
1.1
1.25
1.1
1.5
1.75
1
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO)
2
1
1.5
1.5
1.2
1.4
2.5
1.5
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH3phO)
1
0.7
1.7
—
0.9
—
0.7
0.7
Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-Cl2phO)
—
—
—
0.9
—
—
—
1.25
Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-(NO2)2phO)
—
1.25
1.25
—
—
2
—
1.5
Control chloramphenicol
2.5
2.1
1.4
2
—
2.25
2
2Table 7
In vitro evaluation of complexes against Sclerotium rolfsii.  Mean colony diameter of control C = 90 mm.
Name of the complex
Concentration (µg/mL)
Colony diameter (mm)
% InhibitionI=[(C-T)/C]  × 100
IC50 (µg/mL)
H2TPP
100
66
26.66
212.24
200
48
46.66
300
28
68.89
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NH2phO)
100
57
36.66
180.61
200
39
56.66
300
11
87.77
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-ClphO)
100
61
32.22
159.42
200
43
52.22
300
12
86.66
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-OCH3phO)
100
65
27.77
196.46
200
41
54.44
300
27
70
Zr(TPP)(acac)(α-naphtholate)
100
33
53.33
102.75
200
30
66.66
300
8
91.11
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO)
100
35
51.11
91.87
200
23
73.33
300
7
92.22
Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH3phO)
100
35
61.11
26.02
200
21
77.77
300
7
92.22


## 3.1.3. Antifungal Activity

The antifungal activity of all the synthesized zirconium porphyrin complexes was tested at different concentrations against the pathogenic fungusSclerotium rolfsii. From the results found, it has been concluded that, by increasing the concentration of the complexes ZrTPP(Y)(X), the colony diameter of the fungus decreases and hence percent inhibition increases. On doubling the concentration of the complexes, the percent inhibition also doubles, which shows linear relationship between concentration and percent inhibition. The increase in antimicrobial activity is due to faster diffusion of metal complexes as a whole through the cell membrane or due to combined activity effect of the metal and the ligand [26, 27]. It is concluded that most of the synthesized compounds showed overall good activity. However, some complexes, namely, Zr(TPP)(acac)(phO), Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-Cl2phO), and Zr(TPP)(acac)(o,p-(NO2)2phO), showed negligible results at given concentrations and the data for only those complexes has been provided which showed significant results (Table 7).It is interesting to note that most of the synthesized axially ligated complexes were found to be more active (IC50 = ~26–196 μg/mL) than the corresponding free base ligand (IC50= 212.24 μg/mL) with Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-CH3phO) appearing to be the most potent. The selectivity might be resulting from the well-established structural differences between fungal and bacterial cells, although the exact reasons remain as yet unclear [28].


## 4. Conclusion

A detailed analysis of ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis), proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy, infrared (IR) spectroscopy, fluorescence and mass spectroscopic studies, and elemental analysis suggested the transformation from free base porphyrins to zirconium(IV) porphyrins. The spectroscopic data revealed the ligation of acetylacetonate and different phenolates at axial position on Zr(IV) metal atom in [Zr(TPP)(acac)(X)]. Therefore the coordination number of central metal ions is seven and the zirconium is expected to be above the porphyrin plane. Among all the complexes prepared [Zr(TPP)(acac)(p-NO2phO)] was found to be highly potential against all the eight bacterial strains and even more than positive control in some cases. Also, antifungal activity of the synthesized complexes shows that these complexes have potential against fungal growth.



---

*Source: 543014-2014-10-14.xml*