# A Novel Sintered Stainless Steel Fiber Felt with Rough Surface Morphologies

Authors: Chaobin Fang; Zhenping Wan; Bin Liu; Longsheng Lu
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

A novel sintered stainless steel fiber felt (SSSFF) with rough surface morphologies and high strength as well as high porosity is fabricated by solid-state sintering of stainless steel fibers produced by cutting method. The rough surface morphologies are characterized by laminar and jagged structures formed on the surface of stainless steel fibers. The SSSFF with 85% porosity sintered at 1200°C for 60 min exhibits tensile strength of 19 MPa and yield stress of 10.5 MPa. The influence of sintering parameters on surface morphologies and tensile strength is investigated. The experimental results show that the rough surface structures will disappear gradually when sintering temperature is 1300°C or sintering time is excessive, that is, 240 min when sintering temperature is 1200°C. The SSSFF with high porosity presents high tensile strength when sintering temperature ranges from 1100°C to 1200°C and sintering time is from 60 min to 120 min. In addition, the fracture mechanism of the SSSFF is investigated when subjected to uniaxial tensile load.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

As advanced structural and functional materials, sintered stainless steel fiber felt (SSSFF) has been widely applied to sound absorption, phase change heat transfer, and energy absorption [1], jet noise reduction [2], gas diffusion layer [3, 4] of fuel cell, catalyst support for volatile organic compounds removal [5], and bioimplants [6] owning to three-dimensional network structure, perfect permeability, good thermal stability, outstanding corrosion resistance, and biocompatibility. With the extension of applications, some special requirements for the properties of SSSFFs, such as rough surface and high strength as well as high porosity, are demanded. For example, the rough surface can promote adhesive strength of the primer to the support while using SSSFFs as combustion catalyst supports to disperse active phase [7]. What is more, the SSSFFs used to combustion catalyst support should possess high strength as well as high porosity since the supports have to bear impact of high-speed gas stream and, at the same time, must exhibit low pressure drop [8]. Another example is the application of SSSFFs in bioimplants where monocyte adhesion and inflammatory cytokine production depend on biomaterial properties, such as surface roughness and surface area [6, 9].On the porosity and strength of SSSFFs, a lot of work has been done to tailor the porous structure and the mechanical properties. Qiao et al. [10] investigated the influence of porosity on quasi-static compressive properties of the porous metal media using bundle-drawn stainless steel fibers. The compressive yield stress of the SSSFFs with 82.3% porosity is about 4 MPa. Clyne et al. [11] measured the yield stress of bonded networks of metal fibers using melt-extracted ferritic stainless steel fibers. The yield stress of SSSFFs with 85% porosity and fiber segment aspect ratio of 6 is about 1 MPa. Markaki et al. [12] prepared highly porous material by liquid phase sintering of short stainless steel fibers and the tensile strength was less than 1 MPa. Ducheyne et al. [13] fabricated porous material with low porosity ranging from 20% to 58% by sintering 316L stainless steel fiber. The tensile strength of the SSSFFs made of 100 μm diameter fibers with 57.3% porosity is 52 MPa. From the above investigation, the strength of SSSFFs with high porosity is very low. In addition, the currently available SSSFFs are made of melt-extracted or bundle-drawn stainless steel fibers. The surface of stainless steel fiber fabricated by melt-extraction [14, 15] or bundle-drawing [16, 17] is very smooth. Therefore, preparation of SSSFFs with rough surface and high strength as well as high porosity is a stringent technical demanding.The present study aims to develop a novel SSSFF with rough surface and high strength as well as high porosity using stainless steel fiber manufactured by cutting method. The effects of sintering parameters on surface morphologies are investigated. And also, the influence of sintering parameters and porosity on tensile properties of SSSFF is presented in order to obtain high strength as well as high porosity. In addition, fracture mechanisms of the novel SSSFF are investigated under uniaxial tensile loading.


## 2. Experimental Procedures

### 2.1. Manufacturing Process of Stainless Steel Fiber

The manufacturing of stainless steel fiber is conducted on precise lathe C6132A using a self-designed multitooth tool as shown in Figure1. A row of tiny teeth with triangular cross-section is machined out in the nominal flank face. While making the multitooth tool, the tool is rotated 45° around the y-axis counterclockwise. The parameters of a tiny tooth are m and h measured in cross-section. In Figure 1, γo and αo are nominal rake angle and clearance angle, respectively. The tool is installed by rotating 45° around the y-axis counterclockwise so that the line l does not exert intervention during cutting. Stainless steel 1Cr18Ni9Ti is used as workpiece with diameter of 65 mm. Several long stainless steel fibers with equivalent diameter of 100 μm are produced simultaneously since several tiny teeth are involved in cutting at the same time. According to previous experimental results [18], the parameters of the multitooth tool used in this study are m=0.3 mm, h=0.2 mm, γo=30°, and αo=8°. The cutting depth is 0.2 mm, feed is 0.2 mm/r, and cutting speed is 10 m/min.Figure 1
Schematic drawing of multitooth tool.


### 2.2. Sintering Process of the SSSFF

The sintering process of SSSFF can be divided into following four steps: fiber chipping, mold-pressing, sintering, and cooling. The long stainless steel fibers manufactured by the above cutting method are segmented into short fibers with length of 10–20 mm. The short fibers are placed in a mold cavity layer by layer in random distribution. Pressure is exerted on the mold by bolts. Thus, the semifinished SSSFF sample is obtained in the shape of the mold chamber. The sintering is carried out in a vacuum furnace in order to prevent oxidation and decarburization of stainless steel fiber during high temperature sintering. The heating rate is kept at 300°C/h when the temperature is below 800°C, while reduced to 200°C/h as the temperature is above 800°C. After sintering at a constant temperature, the cooling rate is 400°C/h. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) S-3700N is used to observing the morphologies of the SSSFFs. The average porosityθ of SSSFF can be calculated directly by quality-volume method with the following formula [19]:
(1)θ=1-MρV,
where V is the volume of SSSFF (cm3), M is the mass of SSSFF (g), and ρ is the density of stainless steel (g/cm3).


### 2.3. Tensile Test of the SSSFF

The tensile test is carried out on a universal material testing machine (INSTRON2369, USA) at room temperature. The sample dimension of SSSFF is 105 mm × 15 mm × 2 mm. To avoid the deformation of the SSSFF network structure in the clamping process, rubber mats are placed between clamps before tensile testing. All the samples are pulled to fracture at a constant tensile rate of 1.5 mm/min. Strain is defined as the ratio between the sample elongation and the initial gauge length. The tensile stress is calculated by using pulling force and the initial section of the sample. The stress and strain are recorded throughout the pulling process and then the stress-strain curves are obtained.


## 2.1. Manufacturing Process of Stainless Steel Fiber

The manufacturing of stainless steel fiber is conducted on precise lathe C6132A using a self-designed multitooth tool as shown in Figure1. A row of tiny teeth with triangular cross-section is machined out in the nominal flank face. While making the multitooth tool, the tool is rotated 45° around the y-axis counterclockwise. The parameters of a tiny tooth are m and h measured in cross-section. In Figure 1, γo and αo are nominal rake angle and clearance angle, respectively. The tool is installed by rotating 45° around the y-axis counterclockwise so that the line l does not exert intervention during cutting. Stainless steel 1Cr18Ni9Ti is used as workpiece with diameter of 65 mm. Several long stainless steel fibers with equivalent diameter of 100 μm are produced simultaneously since several tiny teeth are involved in cutting at the same time. According to previous experimental results [18], the parameters of the multitooth tool used in this study are m=0.3 mm, h=0.2 mm, γo=30°, and αo=8°. The cutting depth is 0.2 mm, feed is 0.2 mm/r, and cutting speed is 10 m/min.Figure 1
Schematic drawing of multitooth tool.


## 2.2. Sintering Process of the SSSFF

The sintering process of SSSFF can be divided into following four steps: fiber chipping, mold-pressing, sintering, and cooling. The long stainless steel fibers manufactured by the above cutting method are segmented into short fibers with length of 10–20 mm. The short fibers are placed in a mold cavity layer by layer in random distribution. Pressure is exerted on the mold by bolts. Thus, the semifinished SSSFF sample is obtained in the shape of the mold chamber. The sintering is carried out in a vacuum furnace in order to prevent oxidation and decarburization of stainless steel fiber during high temperature sintering. The heating rate is kept at 300°C/h when the temperature is below 800°C, while reduced to 200°C/h as the temperature is above 800°C. After sintering at a constant temperature, the cooling rate is 400°C/h. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) S-3700N is used to observing the morphologies of the SSSFFs. The average porosityθ of SSSFF can be calculated directly by quality-volume method with the following formula [19]:
(1)θ=1-MρV,
where V is the volume of SSSFF (cm3), M is the mass of SSSFF (g), and ρ is the density of stainless steel (g/cm3).


## 2.3. Tensile Test of the SSSFF

The tensile test is carried out on a universal material testing machine (INSTRON2369, USA) at room temperature. The sample dimension of SSSFF is 105 mm × 15 mm × 2 mm. To avoid the deformation of the SSSFF network structure in the clamping process, rubber mats are placed between clamps before tensile testing. All the samples are pulled to fracture at a constant tensile rate of 1.5 mm/min. Strain is defined as the ratio between the sample elongation and the initial gauge length. The tensile stress is calculated by using pulling force and the initial section of the sample. The stress and strain are recorded throughout the pulling process and then the stress-strain curves are obtained.


## 3. Surface Morphologies of the SSSFF

### 3.1. Characteristics of Surface Morphologies

The surface morphologies of the SSSFF sample before and after being sintered are shown in Figure2. It can be seen from Figure 2 that the rough surface morphologies characterized by laminar and jagged structures are the unique features of the SSSFFs compared with other sintered porous metals using melt-extracted and bundle-drawn stainless steel fibers. The laminar and jagged surface can provide higher specific surface area and promote adhesive strength of the primer to the metallic support while using the SSSFFs as catalyst supports to disperse active phase. Also, the rough surface can favor bone anchoring and improve the mechanical interlocking at the bone-implant interface when the SSSFFs are used to bioimplants. Comparing the surface morphologies of SSSFF sample before sintered with that of SSSFF sintered at 1100°C for 60 min, it can be found that the rough surface features have been retained after sintered. In addition, the contact points among fibers are transformed into sintering joints after being sintered and the sintered SSSFF is more compact and solid. The pores formed among randomly distributed fibers and different sintering joints, such as intercrossed joint points and line points, exhibit irregular and three-dimensionally interconnected structure. Therefore, the porosity of the SSSFF can be tailored at a wide range (60–95%) by changing quality of fibers and mold-pressure.SEM images of (a) SSSFF before sintering and (b) SSSFF sintered at 1100°C for 60 min.
(a)
(b)


### 3.2. Influence of Sintering Temperature on Surface Morphologies

Sintering temperature has significant influence on surface morphologies of SSSFFs. Figures3(a) and 3(b) show the surface morphologies of SSSFFs sintered 60 min at 1200°C and 1300°C, respectively. Comparing Figure 2(b) and Figures 3(a) and 3(b), it can be found that the remaining laminar and jagged structures are clearly visible when sintering temperature is 1100°C and 1200°C. However, melting phenomenon occurs when sintering temperature is 1300°C. At this time, the laminar and jagged structures have disappeared and the surface morphologies of SSSFF become smooth. Thus, the sintering temperature should be no more than 1200°C in order to prepare SSSFFs with rough surface morphologies.Surface morphologies of SSSFF sintered 60 min (a) at 1200°C and (b) at 1300°C.
(a)
(b)


### 3.3. Influence of Sintering Time on Surface Morphologies

Figures4(a) and 4(b) present the surface morphologies of SSSFFs sintered at 1200°C for 120 min and 240 min, respectively. From Figures 3(a) and 4(a), the rough surface of SSSFFs is very distinct. From Figure 4(b), it can be found that the surface morphologies of SSSFF are slick and the laminar and jagged structures disappeared. Therefore, the sintering time should be no longer than 120 min to maintain the rough surface of SSSFFs. It is worth pointing out that some particles form on the surface of the fiber as shown in Figures 3(b) and 4(b) when the sintering temperature is 1300°C or sintering time is excessive, for example, 240 min at 1200°C. The chemical compositions of the particles are listed in Table 1. It is found from Table 1 that the particles are Mn and Cr precipitations. Owning to their high saturated vapor pressure, Mn and Cr precipitate readily from surface layer at exceedingly high sintering temperature or excessive sintering time. The precipitated Mn and Cr combine easily with O to form oxidizing materials since Mn and Cr have a strong affinity for Oxygen. Thus, the O contents of the precipitations are very high. In addition, from Table 1, the Mn, Cr, and O contents of surface of fiber sintered at 1100°C for 60 min or at 1200°C for 60 min are consistent with that of fiber surface before sintering. It is suggested that no Mn and Cr precipitate out from surface layer. In this case, no particles form on the surface of fiber.Table 1
Mn, Cr, and O contents of stainless steel fiber surface and particles.
Sites
Sintering conditions
Cr (%)
Mn (%)
O (%)
Particles
Sintered at 1300°C for 60 min
6.92
41.89
35.34
Particles
Sintered at 1200°C for 240 min
26.37
13.22
51.39
Fiber surface
Before sintering
16.87
0.95
Fiber surface
Sintered at 1200°C for 60 min
17.45
0.94
Fiber surface
Sintered at 1100°C for 60 min
16.08
0.83Surface morphologies of SSSFF sintered at 1200°C (a) for 120 min and (b) for 240 min.
(a)
(b)


## 3.1. Characteristics of Surface Morphologies

The surface morphologies of the SSSFF sample before and after being sintered are shown in Figure2. It can be seen from Figure 2 that the rough surface morphologies characterized by laminar and jagged structures are the unique features of the SSSFFs compared with other sintered porous metals using melt-extracted and bundle-drawn stainless steel fibers. The laminar and jagged surface can provide higher specific surface area and promote adhesive strength of the primer to the metallic support while using the SSSFFs as catalyst supports to disperse active phase. Also, the rough surface can favor bone anchoring and improve the mechanical interlocking at the bone-implant interface when the SSSFFs are used to bioimplants. Comparing the surface morphologies of SSSFF sample before sintered with that of SSSFF sintered at 1100°C for 60 min, it can be found that the rough surface features have been retained after sintered. In addition, the contact points among fibers are transformed into sintering joints after being sintered and the sintered SSSFF is more compact and solid. The pores formed among randomly distributed fibers and different sintering joints, such as intercrossed joint points and line points, exhibit irregular and three-dimensionally interconnected structure. Therefore, the porosity of the SSSFF can be tailored at a wide range (60–95%) by changing quality of fibers and mold-pressure.SEM images of (a) SSSFF before sintering and (b) SSSFF sintered at 1100°C for 60 min.
(a)
(b)


## 3.2. Influence of Sintering Temperature on Surface Morphologies

Sintering temperature has significant influence on surface morphologies of SSSFFs. Figures3(a) and 3(b) show the surface morphologies of SSSFFs sintered 60 min at 1200°C and 1300°C, respectively. Comparing Figure 2(b) and Figures 3(a) and 3(b), it can be found that the remaining laminar and jagged structures are clearly visible when sintering temperature is 1100°C and 1200°C. However, melting phenomenon occurs when sintering temperature is 1300°C. At this time, the laminar and jagged structures have disappeared and the surface morphologies of SSSFF become smooth. Thus, the sintering temperature should be no more than 1200°C in order to prepare SSSFFs with rough surface morphologies.Surface morphologies of SSSFF sintered 60 min (a) at 1200°C and (b) at 1300°C.
(a)
(b)


## 3.3. Influence of Sintering Time on Surface Morphologies

Figures4(a) and 4(b) present the surface morphologies of SSSFFs sintered at 1200°C for 120 min and 240 min, respectively. From Figures 3(a) and 4(a), the rough surface of SSSFFs is very distinct. From Figure 4(b), it can be found that the surface morphologies of SSSFF are slick and the laminar and jagged structures disappeared. Therefore, the sintering time should be no longer than 120 min to maintain the rough surface of SSSFFs. It is worth pointing out that some particles form on the surface of the fiber as shown in Figures 3(b) and 4(b) when the sintering temperature is 1300°C or sintering time is excessive, for example, 240 min at 1200°C. The chemical compositions of the particles are listed in Table 1. It is found from Table 1 that the particles are Mn and Cr precipitations. Owning to their high saturated vapor pressure, Mn and Cr precipitate readily from surface layer at exceedingly high sintering temperature or excessive sintering time. The precipitated Mn and Cr combine easily with O to form oxidizing materials since Mn and Cr have a strong affinity for Oxygen. Thus, the O contents of the precipitations are very high. In addition, from Table 1, the Mn, Cr, and O contents of surface of fiber sintered at 1100°C for 60 min or at 1200°C for 60 min are consistent with that of fiber surface before sintering. It is suggested that no Mn and Cr precipitate out from surface layer. In this case, no particles form on the surface of fiber.Table 1
Mn, Cr, and O contents of stainless steel fiber surface and particles.
Sites
Sintering conditions
Cr (%)
Mn (%)
O (%)
Particles
Sintered at 1300°C for 60 min
6.92
41.89
35.34
Particles
Sintered at 1200°C for 240 min
26.37
13.22
51.39
Fiber surface
Before sintering
16.87
0.95
Fiber surface
Sintered at 1200°C for 60 min
17.45
0.94
Fiber surface
Sintered at 1100°C for 60 min
16.08
0.83Surface morphologies of SSSFF sintered at 1200°C (a) for 120 min and (b) for 240 min.
(a)
(b)


## 4. Effect of Porosity and Sintering Parameters on Tensile Strength

### 4.1. Tensile Strength of the SSSFF with Different Porosities

Porosity as an important parameter of the SSSFF has great influence on the tensile strength. The tensile stress-strain curves of the SSSFF with various high porosities are shown in Figure5 where the SSSFF samples were sintered at 1200°C for 60 min. The SSSFF samples go into linear elastic range after experiencing a short-term initial nonlinear elastic deformation and then enter plastic deformation and hardening range. From Figure 5, the tensile strength of SSSFF samples with 75%, 80%, and 85% porosity reaches 44.5 MPa, 30.5 MPa, and 19 MPa, respectively. The yield stress of SSSFF samples with 75%, 80%, and 85% porosity achieves 25 MPa, 17.5 MPa, and 10.5 MPa, respectively. It can be seen that the tensile strength and yield stress of the SSSFFs are far beyond that of SSSFFs prepared by Clyne et al. [11] and Markaki et al. [12]. Thus, this kind of SSSFFs possesses high strength as well as high porosity. The reason may be that the laminar and jagged surface structures increase the friction between fibers and provide occlusal force to hook fibers together, which are in favor of strong sintering joints forming.Figure 5
Tensile stress-strain curves of the SSSFF with different porosities (sintered at 1200°C for 60 min).


### 4.2. Effect of Sintering Parameters on Tensile Property of the SSSFF

As important manufacturing parameters, sintering temperature and sintering time have a great influence on the forming process of the SSSFFs.


#### 4.2.1. Sintering Temperature

The tensile stress-strain curves of SSSFF samples with 80% porosity sintered at 1000°C, 1100°C, and 1200°C, respectively, for 60 min are shown in Figure6. The tensile strengths of the samples sintered at 1000°C, 1100°C, and 1200°C are 16 MPa, 28.2 MPa, and 30.5 MPa, respectively. With the increase of sintering temperature, material migration becomes active, thereby promoting the formation of sintering joints, which makes bonding of interfiber stronger. Furthermore, the yield stress of samples sintered at 1000°C is 13.3 MPa and the yield stresses of samples sintered at 1100°C and 1200°C are almost identical and reach 17.5 MPa. So, it can be concluded that the sintering temperature should range from 1100°C to 1200°C to obtain high strength.Figure 6
Tensile stress-strain curves of the SSSFF with 80% porosity sintered 60 min.


#### 4.2.2. Sintering Time

The tensile stress-strain curves of samples with 75% porosity sintered at 1200°C for 30 min, 60 min, 120 min, and 240 min, respectively, are shown in Figure7. The tensile strength increases from 33 MPa to 49.5 MPa with sintering time increasing from 30 min to 120 min. However, the tensile strength decreases to 42.8 MPa when prolonging sintering time excessively to 240 min. It can be seen that prolonging the sintering time appropriately can promote the formation and growth of sintering joints since material of contact regions among fibers has enough time to diffuse and the tensile strength is improved. However, excessive sintering time makes grains coarsening, which leads to tensile strength decrease and elongation increase. In addition, the yield stresses of samples sintered for 60 min and 120 min are almost identical and up to 25 MPa. Thus, the appropriate sintering time should be between 60 min and 120 min.Figure 7
Tensile stress-strain curves of the SSSFF with 75% porosity sintered at 1200°C.


## 4.1. Tensile Strength of the SSSFF with Different Porosities

Porosity as an important parameter of the SSSFF has great influence on the tensile strength. The tensile stress-strain curves of the SSSFF with various high porosities are shown in Figure5 where the SSSFF samples were sintered at 1200°C for 60 min. The SSSFF samples go into linear elastic range after experiencing a short-term initial nonlinear elastic deformation and then enter plastic deformation and hardening range. From Figure 5, the tensile strength of SSSFF samples with 75%, 80%, and 85% porosity reaches 44.5 MPa, 30.5 MPa, and 19 MPa, respectively. The yield stress of SSSFF samples with 75%, 80%, and 85% porosity achieves 25 MPa, 17.5 MPa, and 10.5 MPa, respectively. It can be seen that the tensile strength and yield stress of the SSSFFs are far beyond that of SSSFFs prepared by Clyne et al. [11] and Markaki et al. [12]. Thus, this kind of SSSFFs possesses high strength as well as high porosity. The reason may be that the laminar and jagged surface structures increase the friction between fibers and provide occlusal force to hook fibers together, which are in favor of strong sintering joints forming.Figure 5
Tensile stress-strain curves of the SSSFF with different porosities (sintered at 1200°C for 60 min).


## 4.2. Effect of Sintering Parameters on Tensile Property of the SSSFF

As important manufacturing parameters, sintering temperature and sintering time have a great influence on the forming process of the SSSFFs.


### 4.2.1. Sintering Temperature

The tensile stress-strain curves of SSSFF samples with 80% porosity sintered at 1000°C, 1100°C, and 1200°C, respectively, for 60 min are shown in Figure6. The tensile strengths of the samples sintered at 1000°C, 1100°C, and 1200°C are 16 MPa, 28.2 MPa, and 30.5 MPa, respectively. With the increase of sintering temperature, material migration becomes active, thereby promoting the formation of sintering joints, which makes bonding of interfiber stronger. Furthermore, the yield stress of samples sintered at 1000°C is 13.3 MPa and the yield stresses of samples sintered at 1100°C and 1200°C are almost identical and reach 17.5 MPa. So, it can be concluded that the sintering temperature should range from 1100°C to 1200°C to obtain high strength.Figure 6
Tensile stress-strain curves of the SSSFF with 80% porosity sintered 60 min.


### 4.2.2. Sintering Time

The tensile stress-strain curves of samples with 75% porosity sintered at 1200°C for 30 min, 60 min, 120 min, and 240 min, respectively, are shown in Figure7. The tensile strength increases from 33 MPa to 49.5 MPa with sintering time increasing from 30 min to 120 min. However, the tensile strength decreases to 42.8 MPa when prolonging sintering time excessively to 240 min. It can be seen that prolonging the sintering time appropriately can promote the formation and growth of sintering joints since material of contact regions among fibers has enough time to diffuse and the tensile strength is improved. However, excessive sintering time makes grains coarsening, which leads to tensile strength decrease and elongation increase. In addition, the yield stresses of samples sintered for 60 min and 120 min are almost identical and up to 25 MPa. Thus, the appropriate sintering time should be between 60 min and 120 min.Figure 7
Tensile stress-strain curves of the SSSFF with 75% porosity sintered at 1200°C.


## 4.2.1. Sintering Temperature

The tensile stress-strain curves of SSSFF samples with 80% porosity sintered at 1000°C, 1100°C, and 1200°C, respectively, for 60 min are shown in Figure6. The tensile strengths of the samples sintered at 1000°C, 1100°C, and 1200°C are 16 MPa, 28.2 MPa, and 30.5 MPa, respectively. With the increase of sintering temperature, material migration becomes active, thereby promoting the formation of sintering joints, which makes bonding of interfiber stronger. Furthermore, the yield stress of samples sintered at 1000°C is 13.3 MPa and the yield stresses of samples sintered at 1100°C and 1200°C are almost identical and reach 17.5 MPa. So, it can be concluded that the sintering temperature should range from 1100°C to 1200°C to obtain high strength.Figure 6
Tensile stress-strain curves of the SSSFF with 80% porosity sintered 60 min.


## 4.2.2. Sintering Time

The tensile stress-strain curves of samples with 75% porosity sintered at 1200°C for 30 min, 60 min, 120 min, and 240 min, respectively, are shown in Figure7. The tensile strength increases from 33 MPa to 49.5 MPa with sintering time increasing from 30 min to 120 min. However, the tensile strength decreases to 42.8 MPa when prolonging sintering time excessively to 240 min. It can be seen that prolonging the sintering time appropriately can promote the formation and growth of sintering joints since material of contact regions among fibers has enough time to diffuse and the tensile strength is improved. However, excessive sintering time makes grains coarsening, which leads to tensile strength decrease and elongation increase. In addition, the yield stresses of samples sintered for 60 min and 120 min are almost identical and up to 25 MPa. Thus, the appropriate sintering time should be between 60 min and 120 min.Figure 7
Tensile stress-strain curves of the SSSFF with 75% porosity sintered at 1200°C.


## 5. Fracture Mechanism Analysis

So far, the fracture mechanism of SSSFFs has not been investigated deeply under tensile loading. But, the fracture mechanism is important to tailor the mechanical properties of SSSFFs. It is suggested by experimental observations that there are two fracture modes for the SSSFF: sintering joint breaking and fiber filament fracture.


### 5.1. Sintering Joint Breaking

Figure8 shows the fracture morphology of SSSFF sample with 80% porosity sintered at 1000°C for 60 min. It clearly shows from Figure 8 that most of the randomly distributed fibers at fracture region are oriented to the tensile direction with obvious network structure loosing and necking. Owing to high porosity and relatively low sintering temperature, the formation and growth of sintering joints in the three-dimensional reticulated skeleton of SSSFF become difficult, which results in low fiber-to-fiber bonding strength. On the other hand, SSSFFs are multilayer sintered three-dimensional network material by stacking randomly laid stainless steel fibers. Hence, the sintering joints are easily broken by shear stress under tension, which leads to low tensile strength of SSSFFs. In consequence, most of the randomly distributed fibers at fracture region rotate towards the tension direction without any obstacles owning to the sintering joints breaking. In addition, the fracture process is slow due to the resistance coming from fibers rotation, randomly orientational fibers alignment, and friction among fibers. Therefore, the sintering joints breaking by shear-off mechanism is an essential failure mode for the SSSFF under tension loading owing to high porosity, low sintering temperature, or short sintering time. In this case, the tensile strength of SSSFF is low.Figure 8
Failed sample with 80% porosity sintered at 1000°C for 60 min after tension test. (a) Fracture appearance, (b) SEM image of fracture region.


### 5.2. Fiber Filament Fracture

Figure9 shows the fracture morphologies of SSSFF sample with 75% porosity sintered at 1200°C for 60 min. From Figure 9(a), necking phenomenon, network structure loosing, and fibers alignment cannot be observed. Owning to relatively low porosity, proper sintering temperature, and sintering time, the sintering joints among fibers can form and grow successfully, which results in strong interfiber joints. Fiber filament fracture occurs preferentially to joint rupture when tensile stress reaches its fracture strength as shown in Figure 9(b). Fiber filaments go through necking deformation and ductile fracture as shown in Figure 9(c). Since sintering joints are not broken, the randomly distributed fibers cannot rotate towards the tension direction without any obstacles and the three-dimensional network structure does not become loose. While reaching the tensile strength of SSSFF, the fracture of fiber filaments occurs in an instantaneous way, resulting in a sharp stress drop in the stress-strain curves. Therefore, it can be concluded that the fiber filaments fracture is the other essential failure mode for the SSSFF under tension loading owing to relatively low porosity, proper sintering temperature, and sintering time. In this case, the tensile strength of SSSFF is high.Failed sample with 75% porosity sintered at 1200°C for 60 min after tension test. (a) Fracture appearance, (b) SEM image of fracture region, and (c) fractured fiber with necking section.
(a)
(b)
(c)


### 5.3. Combined Fracture Mode

When tensile strength of SSSFF is low, the dominant fracture mode is sintering joint breaking, whereas the dominant fracture is fiber filament fracture when tensile strength of SSSFF is high. However, in most cases, the combined fracture mode is more prevalent. Figure10 presents the fracture morphologies of SSSFF sample with 80% porosity sintered at 1100°C for 60 min. It can be seen from Figure 10(a) that part of fibers is aligned and part of fibers is disorderly. From Figure 10(b), many fibers in fracture region are oriented to the tensile direction and the network structure becomes loose. It is suggested that sintering joint breaking is one of main fracture modes. From Figure 10(c), fiber necking deformation and ductile fracture are observed, which proves that fiber filament fracture is also one of the main fracture modes.Figure 10
Failed sample with 80% porosity sintered at 1100°C for 60 min. (a) Fracture appearance, (b) SEM image of fracture region, and (c) fractured fiber with necking section.


## 5.1. Sintering Joint Breaking

Figure8 shows the fracture morphology of SSSFF sample with 80% porosity sintered at 1000°C for 60 min. It clearly shows from Figure 8 that most of the randomly distributed fibers at fracture region are oriented to the tensile direction with obvious network structure loosing and necking. Owing to high porosity and relatively low sintering temperature, the formation and growth of sintering joints in the three-dimensional reticulated skeleton of SSSFF become difficult, which results in low fiber-to-fiber bonding strength. On the other hand, SSSFFs are multilayer sintered three-dimensional network material by stacking randomly laid stainless steel fibers. Hence, the sintering joints are easily broken by shear stress under tension, which leads to low tensile strength of SSSFFs. In consequence, most of the randomly distributed fibers at fracture region rotate towards the tension direction without any obstacles owning to the sintering joints breaking. In addition, the fracture process is slow due to the resistance coming from fibers rotation, randomly orientational fibers alignment, and friction among fibers. Therefore, the sintering joints breaking by shear-off mechanism is an essential failure mode for the SSSFF under tension loading owing to high porosity, low sintering temperature, or short sintering time. In this case, the tensile strength of SSSFF is low.Figure 8
Failed sample with 80% porosity sintered at 1000°C for 60 min after tension test. (a) Fracture appearance, (b) SEM image of fracture region.


## 5.2. Fiber Filament Fracture

Figure9 shows the fracture morphologies of SSSFF sample with 75% porosity sintered at 1200°C for 60 min. From Figure 9(a), necking phenomenon, network structure loosing, and fibers alignment cannot be observed. Owning to relatively low porosity, proper sintering temperature, and sintering time, the sintering joints among fibers can form and grow successfully, which results in strong interfiber joints. Fiber filament fracture occurs preferentially to joint rupture when tensile stress reaches its fracture strength as shown in Figure 9(b). Fiber filaments go through necking deformation and ductile fracture as shown in Figure 9(c). Since sintering joints are not broken, the randomly distributed fibers cannot rotate towards the tension direction without any obstacles and the three-dimensional network structure does not become loose. While reaching the tensile strength of SSSFF, the fracture of fiber filaments occurs in an instantaneous way, resulting in a sharp stress drop in the stress-strain curves. Therefore, it can be concluded that the fiber filaments fracture is the other essential failure mode for the SSSFF under tension loading owing to relatively low porosity, proper sintering temperature, and sintering time. In this case, the tensile strength of SSSFF is high.Failed sample with 75% porosity sintered at 1200°C for 60 min after tension test. (a) Fracture appearance, (b) SEM image of fracture region, and (c) fractured fiber with necking section.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 5.3. Combined Fracture Mode

When tensile strength of SSSFF is low, the dominant fracture mode is sintering joint breaking, whereas the dominant fracture is fiber filament fracture when tensile strength of SSSFF is high. However, in most cases, the combined fracture mode is more prevalent. Figure10 presents the fracture morphologies of SSSFF sample with 80% porosity sintered at 1100°C for 60 min. It can be seen from Figure 10(a) that part of fibers is aligned and part of fibers is disorderly. From Figure 10(b), many fibers in fracture region are oriented to the tensile direction and the network structure becomes loose. It is suggested that sintering joint breaking is one of main fracture modes. From Figure 10(c), fiber necking deformation and ductile fracture are observed, which proves that fiber filament fracture is also one of the main fracture modes.Figure 10
Failed sample with 80% porosity sintered at 1100°C for 60 min. (a) Fracture appearance, (b) SEM image of fracture region, and (c) fractured fiber with necking section.


## 6. Conclusions

(1)
A novel SSSFF with rough surface morphologies and high strength as well as high porosity is fabricated. The rough surface morphologies characterized by laminar and jagged structures are the unique characteristics of the SSSFF.
(2)
The tensile strength of SSSFF samples with 75%, 80%, and 85% porosity sintered at 1200°C for 60 min reaches 44.5 MPa, 30.5 MPa, and 19 MPa, respectively. The yield stress of SSSFF samples with 75%, 80%, and 85% porosity achieves 25 MPa, 17.5 MPa, and 10.5 MPa, respectively.
(3)
The surface of the SSSFF becomes smooth when sintering temperature is 1300°C or sintering time is excessive, for example, 240 min at 1200°C. In order to obtain SSSFFs with rough surface and high strength, the sintering temperature should range from 1100°C to 1200°C and sintering time should be between 60 min and 120 min.
(4)
There are two fracture mechanisms for the SSSFF under tension. Sintering joints breaking by shear-off is essential fracture mechanism owing to high porosity, low sintering temperature, or short sintering time, while the dominant fracture mechanism is fiber ductile fracture by tension when porosity is relatively low and sintering temperature and sintering time are proper. But in many cases, the SSSFF fails by the combined fracture modes.



---

*Source: 546020-2014-11-13.xml*