# Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma Polymorphisms and Coronary Heart Disease

Authors: Jean Dallongeville; Carlos Iribarren; Jean Ferrières; Liisa Lyon; Alun Evans; Alan S. Go; Dominique Arveiler; Stephen P. Fortmann; Pierre Ducimetière; Mark A. Hlatky; Philippe Amouyel; Audrey Southwick; Thomas Quertermous; Aline Meirhaeghe
Journal: PPAR Research
 (2009)

---

## Abstract

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptorγ (PPARG) gene have been associated with cardiovascular risk factors, particularly obesity and diabetes. We assessed the relationship between 4 PPARG SNPs (C-681G, C-689T, Pro12Ala, and C1431T) and coronary heart disease (CHD) in the PRIME (249 cases/494 controls, only men) and ADVANCE (1,076 cases/805 controls, men or women) studies. In PRIME, homozygote individuals for the minor allele of the PPARG C-689T, Pro12Ala, and C1431T SNPs tended to have a higher risk of CHD than homozygote individuals for the frequent allele (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 3.43 [0.96–12.27], P=.058, 3.41 [0.95–12.22], P=.060 and 5.10 [0.99–26.37], P=.050, resp.). No such association could be detected in ADVANCE. Haplotype distributions were similar in cases and control in both studies. A meta-analysis on the Pro12Ala SNP, based on our data and 11 other published association studies (6,898 CHD cases/11,287 controls), revealed that there was no evidence for a significant association under the dominant model (OR=0.99
[0.92–1.07], P=.82). However, there was a borderline association under the recessive model (OR=1.29 [0.99–1.67], P=.06) that became significant when considering men only (OR=1.73 [1.20–2.48], P=.003). In conclusion, the PPARG Ala12Ala genotype might be associated with a higher CHD risk in men but further confirmation studies are needed.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptorγ (PPARG) is a nuclear hormone receptor that dimerizes with the retinoid X receptor (RXR) to regulate target genes involved in adipocyte differentiation and insulin sensitization [1]. Activation of PPARG with thiazolidinediones is used to stimulate insulin sensitivity in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. PPARG also plays a role in macrophage, malignant breast epithelial, colon cancer cell differentiation, and lipid homeostasis [2] and has been shown to control the expression of proinflammatory genes in vascular cell models [3]. This suggests that PPARG may contribute to the pathogenesis of the atherosclerotic plaque physiology at a very early stage.Prior investigations have analyzed the relationship between commonPPARG SNPs and various metabolic disorders. The Pro12Ala substitution in the specific exon B of PPARG2 isoform, which contributes to a lower PPARG2 activity in vitro, was associated with a decreased risk of type 2 diabetes [4]. Obese carriers of the minor allele of the PPARG C1431T polymorphism in exon 6 presented higher plasma leptin levels than noncarriers [5]. The C-681G and C-689T polymorphisms in the second and third PPARGpromoter, respectively, were both associated with higher body weight and plasma LDL concentrations [6, 7]. Finally, haplotype analyses showed that a particular combination of these 4 polymorphisms was more frequent in patients with a metabolic syndrome than in control subjects [8]. Altogether, these observations suggest that genetic variability at the PPARG locus could affect cardiovascular risk.Early studies analyzed the association between thePPARG Pro12Ala SNP and coronary heart disease (CHD) in cohorts from North America. These investigations yielded inconsistent results [9, 10]. Furthermore, a higher risk of coronary heart disease was reported in obese subjects carrying the Ala12 allele that needed confirmation [10]. Therefore, the goal of the present study was to explore the association between 4 PPARG SNPs, including the Pro12Ala SNP, and CHD risk in two independent studies among white subjects. We also performed haplotype analyses to evaluate whether a particular combination of alleles could better explain the effect of PPARG genetic variability on CHD risk and assessed whether overweight and obesity could modulate this risk. Finally, we performed a meta-analysis of published studies to date, focusing on the PPARG Pro12Ala polymorphism and CHD risk.


## 2. Methods

### 2.1. PRIME Study

The PRIME (Prospective Study of Myocardial Infarction) study is a prospective cohort study designed to identify risk factors for CHD [11]. Details on recruitment, baseline examination, and follow-up of the PRIME Study have been previously reported [12]. Overall, 9758 middle-aged men aged 50–59 years and free of CHD at baseline were recruited in Lille, Strasbourg, and Toulouse in France (n=7399) and Belfast in Northern Ireland (n=2359) between 1991 and 1993 and followed up for 5 years for the occurrence of first CHD events including coronary death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stable or unstable angina pectoris.


#### 2.1.1. General Characteristics

Subjects who agreed to take part in the study were given a morning appointment and asked to fast for at least 12 hours. A full description of clinical and laboratory measurements has been published elsewhere [11, 12]. Briefly, a health questionnaire self-administered by subjects at their homes was subsequently checked by trained interviewers at the clinic. It covered a broad range of clinical information, including family and personal clinical histories, tobacco consumption, and drug intake. Blood pressure was measured twice in the sitting position with the same automatic device (Spengler SP9). A 12-lead ECG was also recorded. Plasma lipids analyses were centralized (SERLIA INSERM U325, Institut Pasteur de Lille, France). Overweight and obesity were defined as BMI ≥25 kg/m2 and BMI ≥30 kg/m2, respectively.


#### 2.1.2. Biochemical Measurements

A subset of biochemical measurements was performed on the entire cohort at baseline. Total cholesterol and triglycerides were measured by enzymatic methods using commercial kits in an automatic analyzer (Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany). High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was determined after precipitation of Apo-lipoprotein B by an enzymatic method (Boehringer). Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was calculated according to the Friedewald formula. Insulin was assayed by competitive radioimmunoassay (Sanofi-Diagnostic Pasteur, France) in cases and matched controls using plasma samples collected at baseline and stored in liquid nitrogen.During the follow-up, subjects were contacted annually by letter and asked to complete a clinical event questionnaire. For all subjects reporting a possible event, clinical information was sought directly from the hospital or general practitioner records. All details on ECGs, hospital admissions, enzymes, surgical intervention, angioplasty, treatments, and so forth were collected. Death certificates were checked for supporting clinical and postmortem information on cause of death. Whenever possible, circumstances of death were obtained from the practitioner or the family. A Medical Committee comprising one member from each PRIME Center and the Coordinating Center, and three cardiologists (two from France and one from the UK), was established to provide an independent validation of coronary events. A description of the coronary end point definitions has been published recently [12]. The five-year follow-up was completed in 98,6% of the French participants and 99,2% of the Northern-Irish participants.A nested case-control study within the PRIME prospective cohort study was mounted using the baseline plasma samples of 335 study participants who subsequently developed a future coronary ischemic event during follow-up and of 670 matched controls (2 controls per case). Matched controls were study participants recruited in the same center, on the same day (± 3 days), of the same age (± 3 years) as the case and free of CHD at the time of the ischemic event of the case. Subjects with incomplete data were excluded. If a case was excluded, his two matched controls were also excluded, and if the two matched controls for a case were excluded, the corresponding case was also excluded. A total of 249 cases and 494 controls were used in the present study.


### 2.2. The ADVANCE Study

The Atherosclerotic Disease, VAscular FuNction, and genetiC Epidemiology (ADVANCE) study recruited, between October 2001 and December 2003, a total of 3,179 subjects from multiple race/ethnic background into 5 cohorts: a cohort of subjects with clinically significant CAD at a young age (≤45 years for males, ≤55 years for females), a cohort of subjects with incident stable angina at an older age, a cohort of subjects with incident acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at an older age, a cohort of young subjects with no history of CAD, and a cohort of subjects aged 60 to 72 with no history of CAD, ischemic stroke, or peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Eligible subjects were identified using the Kaiser Permanente of Northern California (KPNC) electronic databases and those who agreed to participate were interviewed and examined at one of several clinics in the San Francisco Bay Area.  A sixth cohort of young subjects with no history of CAD included 479 participants in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study [13] originally recruited through KPNC and attending the study’s year 15 examination cycle in 2000-2001. A detailed description of the source population for all cohorts has been published elsewhere [14, 15]. The design of the ADVANCE study allowed for several case control comparisons. In this study, we included all white subjects with symptomatic early onset CAD (young cases), older subjects with either AMI or angina as first presentation of CHD (older cases), young controls, and older controls. This resulted in 1 076 CHD cases (706 in men, 370 in women) and 805 controls (433 male, 372 female).The ADVANCE study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at both Stanford University and Kaiser Permanente of Northern California (KPNC). Details of the methodology for risk factor assessment can be found elsewhere [14, 15].


### 2.3. Genotyping

The genotyping method in PRIME has been described previously [8]. The genotyping success rate was above 94% for each SNP. Genotyping in ADVANCE was performed at the Stanford Human Genome Center using the ABI 7900 TaqMan platform [16, 17]. The “no call rate” for genotypes was only 0.35% and the reproducibility was 99.9% in random samples with repeat genotypes.


### 2.4. Statistical Analyses

For ADVANCE, we used unconditional logistic regression because cases and controls were not individually matched. For PRIME, we used conditional logistic regression analysis to compare the distribution of genotypes between cases and controls and to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of CHD. The analyses were adjusted for age, educational level, alcohol consumption, physical activity, smoking status, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, and history of dyslipidemia. Additional analyses were performed to test the interaction between overweight or obesity and genotype by adding a cross-product term to the logistic regression model. We used general regression models and chi-square test to compare the clinical and biological characteristics of the subjects according to genotype in control subjects. Triglyceride values were log transformed for analyses. All analyses were performed using SAS software 8.2 version (SAS Institute, Cary, USA).


#### 2.4.1. Haplotype Analyses

Presence of linkage disequilibrium between the loci was tested using a log-likelihood-ratio test [18] and the degree of disequilibrium was expressed in terms of normalized difference D′=D/Dmax or D/Dmin [19]. Haplotype frequencies were estimated using a stochastic version of the expectation-maximization algorithm as implemented in Thesias software [20, 21]. Differences in haplotype frequencies between cases and their respective controls were examined using a log-likelihood ratio statistic test which was computed from the estimated haplotype frequency log-likelihoods for the case and control groups separately.


#### 2.4.2. Meta-Analysis

In addition to the analysis of PRIME and ADVANCE, we identified all published prospective studies that assessed the relationship between thePPARG Pro12Ala polymorphism and CHD and conducted a meta-analysis of the findings. Inclusion criteria for events were a coronary event. Inclusion criteria for exposure variable were the PPARG Pro12Ala polymorphism. Searches were conducted in electronic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) from 1970 to June 2009. References from the extracted papers, reviews, and previous meta-analysis were also consulted to complete the data bank. The electronic search include both truncated free-text and MeSH. Used terms were “PPARG” or “peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma” and “polymorphism” and “cardiovascular disease” or “CAD” or “CHD” or “coronary” or “MI” or “myocardial” or “ischemic heart disease.” No attempt was made to contact authors of nonpublished work or to find paper in other languages than English. When the data were not available in the appropriate format, the corresponding author of the paper was contacted to obtain the data. However, two studies were excluded because the data were not available in the appropriate format, that is, the number of subjects for the three genotype groups in cases and controls [22, 23]. Finally, 11 studies were selected for the meta-analysis. Therefore, the final data set, including our 3 samples, consisted of 14 independent studies comprising 6898 cases and 11 287 controls (Table 4).For this meta-analysis, we combined data of all studies using Review Manager software release 5.0 (http://www.cc-ims.net/revman/) [24]. We estimated the overall effect by a Mantel–Haentzel fixed odds ratio.


## 2.1. PRIME Study

The PRIME (Prospective Study of Myocardial Infarction) study is a prospective cohort study designed to identify risk factors for CHD [11]. Details on recruitment, baseline examination, and follow-up of the PRIME Study have been previously reported [12]. Overall, 9758 middle-aged men aged 50–59 years and free of CHD at baseline were recruited in Lille, Strasbourg, and Toulouse in France (n=7399) and Belfast in Northern Ireland (n=2359) between 1991 and 1993 and followed up for 5 years for the occurrence of first CHD events including coronary death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stable or unstable angina pectoris.


### 2.1.1. General Characteristics

Subjects who agreed to take part in the study were given a morning appointment and asked to fast for at least 12 hours. A full description of clinical and laboratory measurements has been published elsewhere [11, 12]. Briefly, a health questionnaire self-administered by subjects at their homes was subsequently checked by trained interviewers at the clinic. It covered a broad range of clinical information, including family and personal clinical histories, tobacco consumption, and drug intake. Blood pressure was measured twice in the sitting position with the same automatic device (Spengler SP9). A 12-lead ECG was also recorded. Plasma lipids analyses were centralized (SERLIA INSERM U325, Institut Pasteur de Lille, France). Overweight and obesity were defined as BMI ≥25 kg/m2 and BMI ≥30 kg/m2, respectively.


### 2.1.2. Biochemical Measurements

A subset of biochemical measurements was performed on the entire cohort at baseline. Total cholesterol and triglycerides were measured by enzymatic methods using commercial kits in an automatic analyzer (Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany). High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was determined after precipitation of Apo-lipoprotein B by an enzymatic method (Boehringer). Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was calculated according to the Friedewald formula. Insulin was assayed by competitive radioimmunoassay (Sanofi-Diagnostic Pasteur, France) in cases and matched controls using plasma samples collected at baseline and stored in liquid nitrogen.During the follow-up, subjects were contacted annually by letter and asked to complete a clinical event questionnaire. For all subjects reporting a possible event, clinical information was sought directly from the hospital or general practitioner records. All details on ECGs, hospital admissions, enzymes, surgical intervention, angioplasty, treatments, and so forth were collected. Death certificates were checked for supporting clinical and postmortem information on cause of death. Whenever possible, circumstances of death were obtained from the practitioner or the family. A Medical Committee comprising one member from each PRIME Center and the Coordinating Center, and three cardiologists (two from France and one from the UK), was established to provide an independent validation of coronary events. A description of the coronary end point definitions has been published recently [12]. The five-year follow-up was completed in 98,6% of the French participants and 99,2% of the Northern-Irish participants.A nested case-control study within the PRIME prospective cohort study was mounted using the baseline plasma samples of 335 study participants who subsequently developed a future coronary ischemic event during follow-up and of 670 matched controls (2 controls per case). Matched controls were study participants recruited in the same center, on the same day (± 3 days), of the same age (± 3 years) as the case and free of CHD at the time of the ischemic event of the case. Subjects with incomplete data were excluded. If a case was excluded, his two matched controls were also excluded, and if the two matched controls for a case were excluded, the corresponding case was also excluded. A total of 249 cases and 494 controls were used in the present study.


## 2.1.1. General Characteristics

Subjects who agreed to take part in the study were given a morning appointment and asked to fast for at least 12 hours. A full description of clinical and laboratory measurements has been published elsewhere [11, 12]. Briefly, a health questionnaire self-administered by subjects at their homes was subsequently checked by trained interviewers at the clinic. It covered a broad range of clinical information, including family and personal clinical histories, tobacco consumption, and drug intake. Blood pressure was measured twice in the sitting position with the same automatic device (Spengler SP9). A 12-lead ECG was also recorded. Plasma lipids analyses were centralized (SERLIA INSERM U325, Institut Pasteur de Lille, France). Overweight and obesity were defined as BMI ≥25 kg/m2 and BMI ≥30 kg/m2, respectively.


## 2.1.2. Biochemical Measurements

A subset of biochemical measurements was performed on the entire cohort at baseline. Total cholesterol and triglycerides were measured by enzymatic methods using commercial kits in an automatic analyzer (Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany). High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was determined after precipitation of Apo-lipoprotein B by an enzymatic method (Boehringer). Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was calculated according to the Friedewald formula. Insulin was assayed by competitive radioimmunoassay (Sanofi-Diagnostic Pasteur, France) in cases and matched controls using plasma samples collected at baseline and stored in liquid nitrogen.During the follow-up, subjects were contacted annually by letter and asked to complete a clinical event questionnaire. For all subjects reporting a possible event, clinical information was sought directly from the hospital or general practitioner records. All details on ECGs, hospital admissions, enzymes, surgical intervention, angioplasty, treatments, and so forth were collected. Death certificates were checked for supporting clinical and postmortem information on cause of death. Whenever possible, circumstances of death were obtained from the practitioner or the family. A Medical Committee comprising one member from each PRIME Center and the Coordinating Center, and three cardiologists (two from France and one from the UK), was established to provide an independent validation of coronary events. A description of the coronary end point definitions has been published recently [12]. The five-year follow-up was completed in 98,6% of the French participants and 99,2% of the Northern-Irish participants.A nested case-control study within the PRIME prospective cohort study was mounted using the baseline plasma samples of 335 study participants who subsequently developed a future coronary ischemic event during follow-up and of 670 matched controls (2 controls per case). Matched controls were study participants recruited in the same center, on the same day (± 3 days), of the same age (± 3 years) as the case and free of CHD at the time of the ischemic event of the case. Subjects with incomplete data were excluded. If a case was excluded, his two matched controls were also excluded, and if the two matched controls for a case were excluded, the corresponding case was also excluded. A total of 249 cases and 494 controls were used in the present study.


## 2.2. The ADVANCE Study

The Atherosclerotic Disease, VAscular FuNction, and genetiC Epidemiology (ADVANCE) study recruited, between October 2001 and December 2003, a total of 3,179 subjects from multiple race/ethnic background into 5 cohorts: a cohort of subjects with clinically significant CAD at a young age (≤45 years for males, ≤55 years for females), a cohort of subjects with incident stable angina at an older age, a cohort of subjects with incident acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at an older age, a cohort of young subjects with no history of CAD, and a cohort of subjects aged 60 to 72 with no history of CAD, ischemic stroke, or peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Eligible subjects were identified using the Kaiser Permanente of Northern California (KPNC) electronic databases and those who agreed to participate were interviewed and examined at one of several clinics in the San Francisco Bay Area.  A sixth cohort of young subjects with no history of CAD included 479 participants in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study [13] originally recruited through KPNC and attending the study’s year 15 examination cycle in 2000-2001. A detailed description of the source population for all cohorts has been published elsewhere [14, 15]. The design of the ADVANCE study allowed for several case control comparisons. In this study, we included all white subjects with symptomatic early onset CAD (young cases), older subjects with either AMI or angina as first presentation of CHD (older cases), young controls, and older controls. This resulted in 1 076 CHD cases (706 in men, 370 in women) and 805 controls (433 male, 372 female).The ADVANCE study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at both Stanford University and Kaiser Permanente of Northern California (KPNC). Details of the methodology for risk factor assessment can be found elsewhere [14, 15].


## 2.3. Genotyping

The genotyping method in PRIME has been described previously [8]. The genotyping success rate was above 94% for each SNP. Genotyping in ADVANCE was performed at the Stanford Human Genome Center using the ABI 7900 TaqMan platform [16, 17]. The “no call rate” for genotypes was only 0.35% and the reproducibility was 99.9% in random samples with repeat genotypes.


## 2.4. Statistical Analyses

For ADVANCE, we used unconditional logistic regression because cases and controls were not individually matched. For PRIME, we used conditional logistic regression analysis to compare the distribution of genotypes between cases and controls and to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of CHD. The analyses were adjusted for age, educational level, alcohol consumption, physical activity, smoking status, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, and history of dyslipidemia. Additional analyses were performed to test the interaction between overweight or obesity and genotype by adding a cross-product term to the logistic regression model. We used general regression models and chi-square test to compare the clinical and biological characteristics of the subjects according to genotype in control subjects. Triglyceride values were log transformed for analyses. All analyses were performed using SAS software 8.2 version (SAS Institute, Cary, USA).


### 2.4.1. Haplotype Analyses

Presence of linkage disequilibrium between the loci was tested using a log-likelihood-ratio test [18] and the degree of disequilibrium was expressed in terms of normalized difference D′=D/Dmax or D/Dmin [19]. Haplotype frequencies were estimated using a stochastic version of the expectation-maximization algorithm as implemented in Thesias software [20, 21]. Differences in haplotype frequencies between cases and their respective controls were examined using a log-likelihood ratio statistic test which was computed from the estimated haplotype frequency log-likelihoods for the case and control groups separately.


### 2.4.2. Meta-Analysis

In addition to the analysis of PRIME and ADVANCE, we identified all published prospective studies that assessed the relationship between thePPARG Pro12Ala polymorphism and CHD and conducted a meta-analysis of the findings. Inclusion criteria for events were a coronary event. Inclusion criteria for exposure variable were the PPARG Pro12Ala polymorphism. Searches were conducted in electronic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) from 1970 to June 2009. References from the extracted papers, reviews, and previous meta-analysis were also consulted to complete the data bank. The electronic search include both truncated free-text and MeSH. Used terms were “PPARG” or “peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma” and “polymorphism” and “cardiovascular disease” or “CAD” or “CHD” or “coronary” or “MI” or “myocardial” or “ischemic heart disease.” No attempt was made to contact authors of nonpublished work or to find paper in other languages than English. When the data were not available in the appropriate format, the corresponding author of the paper was contacted to obtain the data. However, two studies were excluded because the data were not available in the appropriate format, that is, the number of subjects for the three genotype groups in cases and controls [22, 23]. Finally, 11 studies were selected for the meta-analysis. Therefore, the final data set, including our 3 samples, consisted of 14 independent studies comprising 6898 cases and 11 287 controls (Table 4).For this meta-analysis, we combined data of all studies using Review Manager software release 5.0 (http://www.cc-ims.net/revman/) [24]. We estimated the overall effect by a Mantel–Haentzel fixed odds ratio.


## 2.4.1. Haplotype Analyses

Presence of linkage disequilibrium between the loci was tested using a log-likelihood-ratio test [18] and the degree of disequilibrium was expressed in terms of normalized difference D′=D/Dmax or D/Dmin [19]. Haplotype frequencies were estimated using a stochastic version of the expectation-maximization algorithm as implemented in Thesias software [20, 21]. Differences in haplotype frequencies between cases and their respective controls were examined using a log-likelihood ratio statistic test which was computed from the estimated haplotype frequency log-likelihoods for the case and control groups separately.


## 2.4.2. Meta-Analysis

In addition to the analysis of PRIME and ADVANCE, we identified all published prospective studies that assessed the relationship between thePPARG Pro12Ala polymorphism and CHD and conducted a meta-analysis of the findings. Inclusion criteria for events were a coronary event. Inclusion criteria for exposure variable were the PPARG Pro12Ala polymorphism. Searches were conducted in electronic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) from 1970 to June 2009. References from the extracted papers, reviews, and previous meta-analysis were also consulted to complete the data bank. The electronic search include both truncated free-text and MeSH. Used terms were “PPARG” or “peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma” and “polymorphism” and “cardiovascular disease” or “CAD” or “CHD” or “coronary” or “MI” or “myocardial” or “ischemic heart disease.” No attempt was made to contact authors of nonpublished work or to find paper in other languages than English. When the data were not available in the appropriate format, the corresponding author of the paper was contacted to obtain the data. However, two studies were excluded because the data were not available in the appropriate format, that is, the number of subjects for the three genotype groups in cases and controls [22, 23]. Finally, 11 studies were selected for the meta-analysis. Therefore, the final data set, including our 3 samples, consisted of 14 independent studies comprising 6898 cases and 11 287 controls (Table 4).For this meta-analysis, we combined data of all studies using Review Manager software release 5.0 (http://www.cc-ims.net/revman/) [24]. We estimated the overall effect by a Mantel–Haentzel fixed odds ratio.


## 3. Results

As expected, major cardiovascular risk factors such as smoking, history of hypertension, history of dyslipidemia, history of diabetes, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels differed between cases and controls in both PRIME and ADVANCE studies (Table1).Table 1
Baseline characteristics of subjects with incident CHD (case) and CHD-free (control) subjects in PRIME and ADVANCE.
PRIME MenADVANCE MenADVANCE WomenControlsCasesP*ControlsCasesP*ControlsCasesP*N494249433706372370Age (y)55.1 ± 2.855.3 ± 3.0.4665.8  ± 3.361.5 ± 7.9<.000161.5  ± 6.960.0 ± 8.8.11BMI (kg/m²)26.7 ± 3.527.1 ± 3.4.1128.3  ± 4.429.1 ± 4.8.00527.4  ± 6.329.6 ± 7.2<.0001Waist girth (cm)93.6 ± 10.195.0 ± 10.2.06799.4  ± 12.6100.0 ± 12.0.4683.8  ± 13.690.4 ± 15.9<.0001Years at school (y)11.26 ± 510.9 ± 3.36NANANANAPhysically active (%)19.619.6.9962.653.8.00463.245.7<.0001Current smokers (%)30.619.7.00196.88.4.368.413.0.04Alcohol consumption (g/week)236 ± 310234 ± 323.8850 ± 14020 ± 70<.000120 ± 700 ± 30<.0001History of hypertension (%)17.630.1.000151.578.8<.000141.779.2<.0001History of dyslipidemia (%)28.534.9.0625.428.6.4611.626.2<.0001History of diabetes (%)4.98.8.03615.523.0<.00015.121.4<.0001Systolic BP (mm Hg)13 ± 19141 ± 2<.0001131 ± 16120 ± 17<.0001124  ± 19121  ± 20.08Diastolic BP (mm Hg)84 ± 1387 ± 12.000875  ± 871 ± 9<.000171 ± 969 ± 9.0004Total cholesterol (mg/dL)225 ± 37234 ± 39.0008202 ± 35NA—210 ± 36NA—LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)146 ± 34157 ± 33.0001124 ± 30NA—124 ± 30NA—HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)47 ± 1243 ± 11<.000149 ± 14NA—62 ± 17NA—Data are expressed as means ± SD or percentages.T*-test for continuous variables and Chi-square test for categorical variables. NA:  Not available. BP: blood pressure.The genotype distributions of the 4PPARG SNPs respected the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in control subjects. In the control group, the frequencies of the PPARG -681G, -689T, Ala12, and 1431T alleles were similar in PRIME and ADVANCE. There were marginal differences in the genotype distribution of the C-689T (P=.04), Pro12Ala (P=.03), and C1431T (P=.04) SNPs between cases and controls in PRIME (Table 2(a)), mainly due to a higher frequency of homozygote subjects for the minor allele in cases compared with controls.Table 2
PPARG genotype distributions among white CHD cases and CHD-free controls and ORs [95% CI] of CHD.
(a)PRIME MenModel 1Model 2ControlsCasesP*OR [95% CI]POR [95% CI]PC-681G (n)484243CC, n (%)286 (59.1)146 (60.1)referencereferenceCG, n (%)174 (35.9)79 (32.5).320.88 [0.64–1.22].440.90 [0.64–1.26].53GG, n (%)24 (5.0)18 (7.4)1.54 [0.79–3.00].201.64 [0.82–3.30].16CG+GG, n (%)198 (40.9)97 (39.9)0.96 [0.71–1.31].820.97 [0.71–1.34].88C-689T (n)484242CC, n (%)374 (77.3)193 (79.7)referencereferenceCT, n (%)106 (21.9)42 (17.4).040.76 [0.51–1.13].180.74 [0.49–1.13].16TT, n (%)4 (0.8)7 (2.9)3.34 [0.98–11.45].0543.43 [0.96–12.27].058CT+TT, n (%)110 (22.7)49 (20.3)0.89 [0.61–1.30].540.87 [0.58–1.29].48Pro12Ala (n)486245CC, n (%)378 (77.8)198 (80.8)referencereferenceCG, n (%)104 (21.4)40 (16.3).030.74 [0.49–1.10].140.72 [0.47–1.10].12GG, n (%)4 (0.8)7 (2.9)3.32 [0.97–11.39].0563.41 [0.95–12.22].060CG+GG, n (%)108 (22.2)47 (19.2)0.85 [0.58–1.25].400.83 [0.55–1.24].36C1431T (n)482241CC, n (%)383 (79.5)189 (78.4)referencereferenceCT, n (%)97 (20.1)46 (19.1).040.94 [0.64–1.38].760.89 [0.60–1.33].58TT, n (%)2 (0.4)6 (2.5)5.93 [1.19–29.45].0295.10 [0.99–26.37].050CT+TT, n (%)99 (20.5)52 (21.6)1.01 [0.69–1.46].980.95 [0.64–1.40].78(b)ADVANCE MenModel 1Model 2ControlsCasesP*OR [95% CI]POR [95% CI]PC-681G (n)420694CC, n (%)238 (56.7)395 (56.9)referencereferenceCG, n (%)159 (37.9)264 (38.1).951.00 [0.78–1.29].991.03 [0.77–1.37].85GG, n (%)23 (5.4)35 (5.0)0.92 [0.53–1.59].760.85 [0.46–1.60].62CG+GG, n (%)182 (43.3)299 (43.1)0.99 [0.77–1.26].931.00  [0.76–1.32].99C-689T (n)423687CC, n (%)326 (77.1)522 (76.0)referencereferenceCT, n (%)93 (22.0)154 (22.4).681.03 [0.77–1.39].821.00 [0.72–1.38].98TT, n (%)4 (0.9)11 (1.6)1.72 [0.54–5.44].351.87 [0.48–7.33].37CT+TT, n (%)97 (22.9)165 (24.0)1.06 [0.80–1.41].680.99 [0.78–1.26].94Pro12Ala (n)426693CC, n (%)330 (77.5)528 (76.2)referencereferenceCG, n (%)92 (21.6)154 (22.2).621.05 [0.78–1.40].761.03 [0.74–1.42].88GG, n (%)4 (0.9)11 (1.6)1.72 [0.54–5.44].361.90 [0.49–7.41].36CG+GG, n (%)96 (22.5)165 (23.8)1.07 [0.81–1.43].621.06 [0.77–1.45].74C1431T (n)426687CC, n (%)325 (76.3)530 (77.2)referencereferenceCT, n (%)98 (23.0)147 (21.4).500.92 [0.69–1.23].570.87 [0.63–1.21].41TT, n (%)3 (0.7)10 (1.4)2.01 [0.55–7.36].291.76 [0.43–7.16].43CT+TT, n (%)101 (23.7)157 (22.8)0.95 [0.71–1.25].730.90 [0.65–1.24].52(c)ADVANCE WomenModel 1Model 2ControlsCasesP*OR [95% CI]POR [95% CI]PC-681G (n)359365CC, n (%)189 (52.7)203 (55.6)referencereferenceCG, n (%)148 (41.2)144 (39.5).640.91 [0.67–1.23].520.97 [0.68–1.38].86GG, n (%)22 (6.1)18 (4.9)0.76 [0.40–1.47].420.64 [0.30–1.4].26CG+GG, n (%)170 (47.3)162 (44.4)0.89 [0.66–1.19].420.92 [0.65–1.29].62C-689T (n)360365CC, n (%)274 (76.1)285 (78.1)referencereferenceCT, n (%)81 (22.5)79 (21.6).260.94 [0.66–1.33].721.07 [0.71–1.6].74TT, n (%)5 (1.4)1 (0.3)0.19 [0.02–1.66].130.17 [0.02–1.54].12CT+TT, n (%)86 (23.9)80 (21.9)0.89 [0.63–1.26].531.00 [0.67–1.49].99Pro12Ala (n)362366CC, n (%)275 (76.0)288 (78.7)referencereferenceCG, n (%)82 (22.6)77 (21.0).220.90 [0.63–1.28].541.02 [0.68–1.53].93GG, n (%)5 (1.4)1 (0.3)0.19 [0.02–1.65].130.168 [0.02–1.51].11CG+GG, n (%)87 (24.0)78 (21.3)0.86 [0.60–1.21].380.99 [0.67–1.49].80C1431T (n)366367CC, n (%)278 (76.0)281 (76.6)referencereferenceCT, n (%)81 (22.1)83 (22.6).501.01 [0.72–1.44].941.08 [0.72–1.63].70TT, n (%)7 (1.9)3 (0.8)0.42 [0.11–1.66].210.30 [0.07–1.32].11CT+TT, n (%)88 (24.0)86 (23.4)0.97 [0.69–1.36].851.00 [0.67–1.49].96*P value for a global test of significance. Model 1: crude OR. Model 2: OR adjusted for age, BMI, educational level, smoking status, physical activity, alcohol intake, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, and history of dyslipidemia.The odds ratios (ORs) [95% CI] of CHD were calculated for heterozygotes, for homozygotes, and for carriers of the minor allele (dominant model), using both a crude model and an adjusted model (Table2(a)). In PRIME, homozygote individuals for the minor allele of the PPARG C-689T, Pro12Ala, and C1431T SNPs tended to have a higher risk of CHD than homozygote individuals for the frequent allele (OR [95% CI] = 3.34 [0.98–11.45], P=.054, OR = 3.32 [0.97–11.39], P=.056 and OR = 5.93 [1.19–29.45], P=.029, resp.). After adjustment for age, educational level, smoking status, physical activity, alcohol intake, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, and history of dyslipidemia, the ORs were only slightly altered (OR = 3.43 [0.96–12.27], P=.058, 3.41 [0.95–12.22], P=.060 and 5.10 [0.99–26.37], P=.050 for the C-689T, Pro12Ala and C1431T SNPs, resp.). There was no significant association in ADVANCE, neither in men nor in women (Table 2(b) and (c)). Further analyses stratifying on overweight (<25 kg/m2 versus ≥25 kg/m2) or obesity (<30 kg/m2 versus ≥30 kg/m2) or adding a cross-product term into the model yielded no significant interaction (all P values for interaction term >0.1) in both studies (data not shown).In control subjects from PRIME and ADVANCE, there were very few significant differences in baseline characteristics between carriers and noncarriers of thePPARG-681G, -689T, Ala12, and 1431T alleles (see Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 in Supplementary Material available online at doi:10.155/2009/543746). Systolic blood pressure was significantly lower (P<.05) in carriers of thePPARG-681G, -689T and Ala12 alleles in PRIME (Supplementary Table 1). There was no statistically significant difference in mean BMI, LDL-cholesterol, or HDL-cholesterol levels between carriers and noncarriers of the minor allele of any SNP investigated. There was also no evidence for any statistically significant difference in the prevalence of reported hypertension, dyslipidemia, or diabetes between carriers and noncarriers of the minor allele of these SNPs.The Pro12Ala and the C-681G, C-689T, and C1431T SNPs were in partial positive linkage disequilibrium (D′range=+0.6-+1.0, r2range=0.18–0.98). The C-689T and Pro12Ala SNPs were in perfect linkage disequilibrium (D′=+1.0,r2=0.98). The distribution of the 4 SNP -containing haplotypes was estimated in cases and controls (Table 3). Six haplotypes covered 98% of the possible haplotypes. The frequency of the haplotype composed of the 4 most frequent alleles was >70% in both cases and controls. There was no evidence for any statistically significant difference in haplotype distribution between cases and controls, neither in PRIME nor in ADVANCE (P>.38). Haplotype analyses were also conducted after stratification on overweight or obesity. In these analyses, there was no evidence of significant difference of haplotype distributions between cases and controls in overweight or lean, obese, or nonobese subjects (data not shown).Table 3
Estimate ofPPARG haplotype frequencies in cases and controls.
C-681GC-689TPro12AlaC1431TControlsCasesPPRIME Men11110.720.7221110.110.1122220.080.09.5322210.040.0311120.030.0321120.010.02ADVANCE Men11110.740.7321110.110.1022220.090.08.3822210.030.0411120.020.0221120.020.01ADVANCE Women11110.710.7221110.130.1322220.080.08.7022210.040.0311120.030.0321120.010.01Only haplotypes with a frequency >1% are displayed.  1 and 2 represent the frequent and minor alleles, respectively.P value is for the global effect (5 df).Table 4
(a)
Meta-analysis of CHD risk for thePPARG Pro12Ala polymorphism under the dominant model.
CasesControlsOdds ratioOdds ratioStudy or SubgroupEventsTotalEventsTotalWeightM-H, Fixed, 95% CIM-H, Fixed, 95% CIADVANCE, Men165693964267.1%1.07 [0.81, 1.43]ADVANCE, Women78366873625.4%0.86 [0.60, 1.21]Bluher et al., Men + Women27201241641.8%0.91 [0.50, 1.64]Li et al., Men + Women23218386261.4%1.83 [1.06, 3.14]Pischon et al., Men63250955023.7%1.44 [1.00, 2.07]Pischon et al., Women58245994854.0%1.21 [0.84, 1.75]PRIME, Men472451084864.6%0.83 [0.57, 1.22]Ridker et al., Men98523482209212.3%0.77 [0.60, 0.98]Ruiz et al., Men + Women3651805335180520.9%1.11 [0.94, 1.31]Tobin et al., Men + Women1135471245058.0%0.80 [0.60, 1.07]Vogel et al., Men19778621688012.0%1.03 [0.82, 1.28]Vogel et al., Women642452087895.7%0.99 [0.71, 1.37]Vos et al., Men1265631346467.6%1.10 [0.84, 1.45]Zafarmand et al., Women4421137615195.7%0.80 [0.56, 1.14]Total (95% CI)689811287100.0%1.00 [0.93, 1.08]Total events14682422Heterogeneity: Chi2  = 22.10, df = 13 (P=.05); I2=41%Test for overall effect:Z=0.06 (P=.95)(b)
Meta-analysis of CHD risk for thePPARG Pro12Ala polymorphism under the recessive model.
CasesControlsOdds ratioOdds ratioStudy or SubgroupEventsTotalEventsTotalWeightM-H, Fixed, 95% CIM-H, Fixed, 95% CIADVANCE, Men1169344264.9%1.70 [0.54, 5.38]ADVANCE, Women136653625.0%0.20 [0.02, 1.68]Bluher et al., Men + Women420121642.2%1.64 [0.30, 9.09]Li et al., Men + Women021826261.3%0.57 [0.03, 11.95]Pischon et al., Men425045022.6%2.02 [0.50, 8.16]Pischon et al., Women424564854.0%1.33 [0.37, 4.74]PRIME, Men724544862.6%3.54 [1.03, 12.23]Ridker et al., Men652331209212.3%0.77 [0.32, 1.86]Ruiz et al., Men + Women24180525180524.8%0.96 [0.55, 1.69]Tobin et al., Men + Women1054745054.1%2.33 [0.73, 7.48]Vogel et al., Men217861288011.1%1.99 [0.97, 4.06]Vogel et al., Women2245157897.1%0.42 [0.10, 1.87]Vos et al., Men215631264610.8%2.05 [1.00, 4.20]Zafarmand et al., Women32113015197.2%0.72 [0.22, 2.37]Total (95% CI)689811287100.0%1.29 [0.99, 1.67]Total events118156Heterogeneity: Chi2  = 15.93, df = 13 (P=.25); I2=18%Test for overall effect:Z=1.90(P=.06)(c)
Meta-analysis of CHD risk for thePPARG Pro12Ala polymorphism under the recessive model in men.
CasesControlsOdds ratioOdds ratioStudy or SubgroupEventsTotalEventsTotalWeightM-H, Fixed, 95% CIM-H, Fixed, 95% CIADVANCE, Men11693442611.0%1.70 [0.54, 5.38]Pischon et al., Men425045025.9%2.02 [0.50, 8.16]PRIME, Men724544865.9%3.54 [1.03, 12.23]Ridker et al., Men652331209227.8%0.77 [0.32, 1.86]Vogel et al., Men217861288025.0%1.99 [0.97, 4.06]Vos et al., Men215631264624.4%2.05 [1.00, 4.20]Total (95% CI)30605032100.0%1.73 [1.20, 2.48]Total events7067Heterogeneity: Chi2  = 4.93, df = 5 (P=.42); I2=0%Test for overall effect:Z=2.96 (P=.003)Pooled estimate of CHD odds ratios were calculated from published studies for thePPARG Ala12Pro SNP including 6898 cases and 11 287 controls. Funnel plot analysis revealed no evidence of publication bias. There was no significant association with CHD under the dominant genetic model (OR = 1.00 [0.93–1.08], P=.95) (Table 4(a)). There was significant heterogeneity in the meta-analysis (Chi² = 22.10, df = 13, P=.05) due to the study of Li et al., which was the only study to show a significant association between the Ala12 allele and a higher CHD risk. When removing this study from the meta-analysis (heterogeneity Chi² = 17.37, df = 12, P=.14), the odds ratio of CHD was 0.99 [0.92–1.07], P=.82. The ORs of CHD were similar in men (OR = 0.99, P=.91) and women (OR = 0.94, P=.52).Using the recessive genetic model, there was a borderline association between the Ala12Ala genotype and CHD risk (OR = 1.29 [0.99–1.67],P=.06) (Table 4(b)). When stratifying on gender, Ala12Ala men had a significant higher risk of CHD (OR = 1.73 [1.20–2.48], P=.003) than men carrying the Pro12 allele (Table 4(c)). No such association could be detected in women (OR = 0.62 [0.31–1.24], P=.17) (data not shown).


## 4. Discussion

In the present study, we did not find any consistent association between thePPARG C-681G, C-689T, Pro12Ala, or C1431T SNPs or related haplotypes and CHD risk, neither in men nor in women, in the PRIME and ADVANCE studies. Furthermore, analyses stratified on overweight or obesity revealed no evidence that these PPARG variants influence CHD risk in overweight or obese men. These data do not support the hypothesis that PPARG C-681G, C-689T, Pro12Ala, and C1431T polymorphisms are major risk factors for CHD but does not rule out the possibility of an association of small magnitude, especially in homozygote Ala12Ala men.PPARG is a ligand-activated transcription factor playing an important role in adipocyte differentiation, glucose homeostasis, and several vascular processes. In vitro studies have shown that thePPARG Ala12 allele decreases PPARG activation of reporter genes (4) and the -681G and -689T alleles are associated with lower PPARG promoter activity [4, 6, 7] suggesting that carriers of these alleles might have a lower PPARG-mediated activation of target genes than noncarriers.Earlier clinical and epidemiological studies have assessed the relationship between variability at thePPARG gene loci and CHD risk. The results of these investigations have been inconsistent with some studies showing a reduced risk of coronary heart disease [9, 22], other studies an increased risk [25–29] and some others reporting no association [10, 23, 30–33]. In contrast, three studies showed less intima-media carotid thickening in carriers of the PPARG Ala12 allele suggesting a possible relation between this variant and sub-clinical atherosclerosis [34–36].We found no consistent association for none of the 4PPARG SNPs (C-681G, C-689T, Pro12Ala, and C1431T) in PRIME and ADVANCE. Only in PRIME, we observed that men homozygotes for the minor allele of the C-689T, Pro12Ala, and C1431T SNPs had a higher risk of CHD than homozygotes for the frequent allele. This result was further confirmed in the meta-analysis including 3060 cases and 5032 controls that showed a higher risk of CHD in Ala12Ala men. Recent genome whole association studies failed to identify associations with PPARGSNPs [37–42]. Firstly, this might be explained by the gender-specific effect and the restrictive recessive genetic model of the PPARG association. Secondly, the 4 SNPs that were investigated in the present study may not be the culprit ones, but rather be in linkage disequilibrium with a causal mutation, resulting in a dilution of a possible association.PPARG SNPs may affect CHD risk through their association with cardiovascular risk factors. In the present study, we found no evidence for significant differences in major cardiovascular risk factors for example, body mass index, lipid levels, or history of diabetes, between carriers and noncarriers of the minor alleles. The only exception was a borderline association with systolic blood pressure level which was lower in PPARG-681G, -689T, and Ala12 carriers than in noncarriers in the PRIME study and could confer some protection against CHD. These findings are in agreement with other studies which showed lower levels of blood pressure or risk of hypertension in carriers of the minor allele of the PPARG Pro12Ala SNP [43–45]. However, these associations are inconsistent across studies as some also reported higher levels [46, 47] or not significantly different levels [48, 49] of blood pressure between carriers and noncarriers of the PPARG Ala12 allele. In this sample of apparently healthy men, the prevalence of hypertension was low (~18%) and the impact of the PPARG-681G, -689T, and Ala12 alleles on blood pressure was clinically limited.An earlier study has reported a significant higher risk of MI and fatal CHD in overweight but not in normal weight subjects [10] suggesting that the impact of PPARG genotype may differ according to body fat mass. In the present study, which has a similar number of cases and controls, we found no evidence for such a relationship, suggesting that obesity is not a determinant of the association between PPARG genetic variability and CHD.


## 5. Conclusion

In the present study, there was no major consistent association between thePPARG C-681G, C-689T, Pro12Ala, and C1431T genotypes or related haplotypes and CHD risk. When combining our data with previous cohort studies, focusing on the PPARGPro12Ala SNP, we found a significant association between the homozygote Ala12Ala genotype and a higher risk of CHD in men. Further studies are needed to definitely conclude.


## The PRIME Study Group

The Strasbourg MONICA Project, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Strasbourg, France (D. Arveiler, B. Haas).The Toulouse MONICA Project, INSERM U558, Department of Epidemiology, Paul Sabatier-Toulouse Purpan University, Toulouse, France (J. Ferrières, JB. Ruidavets).The Lille MONICA Project, INSERM U744, Pasteur Institute, Lille, France (P. Amouyel, M. Montaye).The Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland (A. Evans, J. Yarnell, F. Kee).The Department of Atherosclerosis, INSERM U545, Lille, France (G. Luc, JM. Bard).The Laboratory of Haematology, INSERM U626, La Timone Hospital, Marseilles, France (I. Juhan-Vague, Pierre Morange).The Laboratory of Endocrinology, INSERM U563, Toulouse, France (B. Perret).The Vitamin Research Unit, The University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (F. Gey).The Trace Element Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland (Jayne Woodside, Ian Young).The DNA Bank, INSERM U525, Paris, France (F. Cambien).The Coordinating Center, INSERM U780 (ex-U258), Paris-Villejuif, France (P. Ducimetière, A. Bingham).



---

*Source: 543746-2009-12-01.xml*