# Effect of Weld Properties on the Crush Strength of the PWR Spacer Grid

Authors: Kee-nam Song; Sang-hoon Lee
Journal: Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

Mechanical properties in a weld zone are different from those in the base material because of different microstructures. A spacer grid in PWR fuel is a structural component with an interconnected and welded array of slotted grid straps. Previous research on the strength analyses of the spacer grid was performed using base material properties owing to a lack of mechanical properties in the weld zone. In this study, based on the mechanical properties in the weld zone of the spacer grid recently obtained by an instrumented indentation technique, the strength analyses considering the mechanical properties in the weld zone were performed, and the analysis results were compared with the previous research.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

A PWR fuel assembly consists of spacer grids, fuel rods, a top nozzle, a bottom nozzle, guide tubes, and an instrumentation tube as shown in Figure1. Among them, the spacer grid is a structural component which is an interconnected array of slotted grid straps and is welded at intersections to form an egg-crate structure. From a structural point of view, the spacer grid is required to have enough crush strength under lateral loads so that nuclear fuel rods are maintained in a coolable geometry, allowing control rods to be inserted [1]. The capacity of a spacer grid to resist lateral loads is usually characterized in terms of its crush strength, and it was reported [2] that the lateral crush strength of the spacer grid is closely related with the welding quality of the spacer grid.Figure 1
PWR fuel assembly and spacer grid.Welding is a very convenient and widely used method to join simple metallic parts with a complicated structure by the use of adhesive and cohesive attractive forces between metals [3]. Microstructures in the weld zone, including a weld (or fusion zone) and a heat affected zone (HAZ), are different from that in a base material, as shown in Figure 2 [3]. Consequently, the mechanical properties in the weld zone are different from those in the base material to some extent. When a welded structure is loaded, the mechanical behavior of the welded structure might be different from the case of a structure with homogeneous mechanical properties. Nonetheless, mechanical properties in the welded structure have been neglected in many structural analyses [4–7] of spacer grids due to a lack of mechanical properties in the weld zone. Usually, the general way to obtain the mechanical properties in the weld zone is by taking tensile test specimens in the fusion zone and HAZ, and by performing a standard tensile test. However, when the weld zone is very narrow and the interfaces are not clear, it is hard to take tensile test specimens in the weld zone. The reason for this is that the mechanical properties in the base material are usually used in the structural analyses in the welded structure. It has been recently known that the ball indentation technique has the potential to be an excellent substitute for a standard tensile test, especially in the case of small specimens or property-gradient materials such as welds [8–10].Figure 2
Microstructure near the weld [3].In this study, to investigate the effect on the mechanical behavior of the spacer grid when using weld mechanical properties, strength analyses considering the weld mechanical properties recently obtained [11] by an instrumented indentation technique are performed, and the analysis results were compared with the results of the previous research using base material properties.


## 2. Structure of a Zircaloy Spacer Grid in PWR Fuel

Zircaloy is the prevailing material of a spacer grid because of its low neutron absorption characteristic and extensive successful in-reactor use. A Zircaloy spacer grid and a weld bead at the intersections of the straps are shown in Figure1. Spot welding by a laser beam welding technique is prevalent in most of the Zircaloy spacer grid manufacturing vendors, for the purpose of a smaller bead size and a larger weld penetration at the welding parts. Generally, a spacer grid with a smaller bead size leads to a smaller pressure drop of the coolant flowing along the nuclear fuel assembly, which consequently leads to a reduction in the load on a reactor coolant pump. In addition, a spacer grid with a deeper weld penetration results in larger crush strength of the spacer grid [4]. The diameter of the weld bead is about 2 mm and the width of the HAZ is just below 1 mm for a Zircaloy spacer grid strip 0.457 mm thick. That is to say, the weld zone including the weld bead (or fusion zone) and HAZ is very narrow, and the interfaces are not so clear. Thus, it is usually difficult to obtain the mechanical properties in the weld zone from the conventional tensile test specimen.


## 3. Mechanical Properties in Weld Zone

### 3.1. Instrumented Indentation Method

Indentation is known to be a remarkably flexible mechanical test to obtain properties including hardness, Young’s modulus, yield stress, and tensile strength with minimal specimen preparation [8, 9]. The additional advantage of indentation is the ability to obtain the mechanical properties in a narrow or inaccessible region through other methods such as uni-axial tension or a compression test. An instrumented indentation method continuously measures the load and depth if an indentation is made. The derived indentation load-depth curve, shown in Figure 3, can thus be used to determine the mechanical properties. In this study, a continuous indentation tester was used to measure the indentation load-depth curve for Zircaloy-4 and Hastelloy-X welded specimens using a spherical ball. The test condition using the indentation tester is summarized in Table 1. Based on the load-depth curve, mechanical properties such as yield stress and tensile strength are obtained using the algorithm in the continuous indentation tester [12].Table 1
Test condition of instrumented indentation.
Control type
Displace-controlled test
Maximum indentation depth
6μm
Number of indentation
6
Unloading rate
50%
Test speed
0.03 mm/min
Equipment
Micro AIS
Indenter type
Sphere type indenter
Diameter of indenter
0.05 mmFigure 3
Schematic representation of indentation load-depth curve.


### 3.2. Welded Zircaloy-4 Strip

Zircaloy-4 of zirconium alloy is used as the structural material of nuclear fuel since it has a superior combination of neutron economy (low absorption cross-section), high strength to resist deformation, high corrosion resistance to coolant, fuel, and fission products, and high reliability. The chemical composition of Zircaloy-4 is summarized in Table2 [13]. Figure 4 shows an etched specimen and its indented positions for taking the mechanical properties of the base material, the weld bead (or fusion zone), and the HAZ of the specimen. Figure 5 shows variations of the mechanical properties along lines L1 through L4, as shown in Figure 4. According to Figure 5, variations of tensile strength and yield stress are dominant in the weld zone including the weld bead and the HAZ as compared with the base material.Table 2
Chemical composition (wt%) of Zircaloy-4.
Zn
Sn
Fe
Cr
Fe + Cr
Rest
1.20–1.70
0.18–0.24
0.07–0.13
0.28–0.37Figure 4
Etched specimen and indented positions in welded Zircaloy-4 strip.Variation of mechanical properties in welded Zircaloy-4 strip.


### 3.3. Analysis of Measured Data

The average values of the mechanical properties in the base material, weld bead, and HAZ are obtained using the measured data shown in Figure5. Based on the average mechanical properties in the base material, the normalizing factors are obtained [11] in the weld and HAZ to be utilized in the strength analysis later. The normalizing factors in the base material, the weld, and HAZ are summarized in Table 3. According to Table 3, the mechanical properties in the weld bead (or fusion zone), HAZ, and base material are different to some extent and, thus, might affect the structural behavior and crush strength of the spacer grid.Table 3
Normalized mechanical properties of Zircaloy-4 weld strip.
Yield stress
Tensile strength
Base material
1.000
1.000
HAZ
1.167
1.163
Weld
1.373
1.492


## 3.1. Instrumented Indentation Method

Indentation is known to be a remarkably flexible mechanical test to obtain properties including hardness, Young’s modulus, yield stress, and tensile strength with minimal specimen preparation [8, 9]. The additional advantage of indentation is the ability to obtain the mechanical properties in a narrow or inaccessible region through other methods such as uni-axial tension or a compression test. An instrumented indentation method continuously measures the load and depth if an indentation is made. The derived indentation load-depth curve, shown in Figure 3, can thus be used to determine the mechanical properties. In this study, a continuous indentation tester was used to measure the indentation load-depth curve for Zircaloy-4 and Hastelloy-X welded specimens using a spherical ball. The test condition using the indentation tester is summarized in Table 1. Based on the load-depth curve, mechanical properties such as yield stress and tensile strength are obtained using the algorithm in the continuous indentation tester [12].Table 1
Test condition of instrumented indentation.
Control type
Displace-controlled test
Maximum indentation depth
6μm
Number of indentation
6
Unloading rate
50%
Test speed
0.03 mm/min
Equipment
Micro AIS
Indenter type
Sphere type indenter
Diameter of indenter
0.05 mmFigure 3
Schematic representation of indentation load-depth curve.


## 3.2. Welded Zircaloy-4 Strip

Zircaloy-4 of zirconium alloy is used as the structural material of nuclear fuel since it has a superior combination of neutron economy (low absorption cross-section), high strength to resist deformation, high corrosion resistance to coolant, fuel, and fission products, and high reliability. The chemical composition of Zircaloy-4 is summarized in Table2 [13]. Figure 4 shows an etched specimen and its indented positions for taking the mechanical properties of the base material, the weld bead (or fusion zone), and the HAZ of the specimen. Figure 5 shows variations of the mechanical properties along lines L1 through L4, as shown in Figure 4. According to Figure 5, variations of tensile strength and yield stress are dominant in the weld zone including the weld bead and the HAZ as compared with the base material.Table 2
Chemical composition (wt%) of Zircaloy-4.
Zn
Sn
Fe
Cr
Fe + Cr
Rest
1.20–1.70
0.18–0.24
0.07–0.13
0.28–0.37Figure 4
Etched specimen and indented positions in welded Zircaloy-4 strip.Variation of mechanical properties in welded Zircaloy-4 strip.


## 3.3. Analysis of Measured Data

The average values of the mechanical properties in the base material, weld bead, and HAZ are obtained using the measured data shown in Figure5. Based on the average mechanical properties in the base material, the normalizing factors are obtained [11] in the weld and HAZ to be utilized in the strength analysis later. The normalizing factors in the base material, the weld, and HAZ are summarized in Table 3. According to Table 3, the mechanical properties in the weld bead (or fusion zone), HAZ, and base material are different to some extent and, thus, might affect the structural behavior and crush strength of the spacer grid.Table 3
Normalized mechanical properties of Zircaloy-4 weld strip.
Yield stress
Tensile strength
Base material
1.000
1.000
HAZ
1.167
1.163
Weld
1.373
1.492


## 4. Strength Analysis and Discussion

### 4.1. Finite Element Modeling

When performing a crush strength test and analysis on a full-size spacer grid (16×16 array) as shown in Figure 6, it requires too much time and cost to fabricate and model the full-size spacer grid specimen. Previous research [4, 6] reported that a subsize spacer grid specimen (7×7 array) shows the crush strength tendency of the full-size spacer grid well when estimating the crush strength. Thus, as an alternative, a crush strength test and analysis on the subsize spacer grid specimen shown in Figure 7 is going to be carried out in this study. Geometric data of the subsize spacer grid are summarized in Table 4. To obtain more data for a comparison with the test and analysis results, three kinds of subsize spacer grid specimen with different weld penetration, namely, one by spot welding and two by line welding, as shown in Figure 8, have been prepared. A crush strength test was performed on 5 specimens and the average crush strength was obtained.Table 4
Geometric data for the subsize (7 × 7 array) spacer grid specimen.
Specimen (7 × 7 type)
Strap thickness (mm)
Outer strap A
Outer strap B
Inner strap
0.664
0.457
0.457Figure 6
Subsize (7×7 array) spacer grid specimen.Figure 7
Full-size (16×16 array) spacer grid specimen.Figure 8
Line welding along the intersection of straps.An FE model for predicting the crush strength of the subsize spacer grid has been established, reflecting a real test environment. Figure9 shows the FE model of the subsized spacer grid and the boundary condition. As shown in Figure 9, a rigid and mass element was used for simulating the impact hammer and all degrees of freedom were fixed at the rigid surface of the bottom side. The applied boundary condition simulated the actual test condition. The initial impact velocity at the reference node (at the center of the upper rigid surface) is applied, and the output accelerations for the initial impact velocity are obtained at this node.Figure 9
FE model of subsize (7×7 array) spacer grid.The 4-node shell elements were used for the inner/outer straps. Since the slot width in the inner straps is wider than the inner strap thickness, there may be a gap at the interconnected parts. Thus, surface-to-node contact elements were used at these interconnected parts to simulate the gap conditions. The FE model is composed of 24,448 2D linear quadrilateral shell elements. Three kinds of FE model with different weld penetration are formulated for the base material properties shown in Figure10 and for the weld material properties shown in Figure 11.FE models using base material properties.
(a)
P-spot welding
(b)
P-9.275 mm
(c)
P-13.28 mmFE models using weld material properties.
(a)
W-spot welding
(b)
W-9.275 mm
(c)
W-13.28 mm


### 4.2. Finite Element Analysis and Discussion

Crush strength analyses are carried out using a commercial FE code LS-DYNA [14]. Figure 12 shows the elastic-plastic stress-strain curve of Zircaloy-4 from the unidirectional tensile test [15]. For the crush strength analysis using the base material properties, the stress-strain curve shown in Figure 12 is used as the material properties. On the other hand, for the crush strength analysis using the weld material properties, stress-strain curves in the weld zone including weld and HAZ are generated by multiplying the stress-strain curve of Figure 12 by normalizing the factors in Table 3. The reaction force of the subsize spacer grid at each impact velocity is evaluated by multiplying the maximum acceleration of the model by the mass of the impact hammer. The reaction force, in other words, the crush load, increases as the impact velocity increases.Figure 12
Stress-strain curve of Zircaloy-4.Figure13 shows the results of crush strength analyses on the three kinds of FE model for using the base material properties and weld properties. According to Figure 13, the crush load increases and becomes saturated to the maximum values as the impact velocity increases, and the maximum crush loads using weld material properties for three FE models are about 30% lower than those using base material properties. In addition, the crush load increases as the weld line increases from spot welding (2.0 mm) to line welding of 13.28 mm due to the increase of effective height of the strap discussed by Song et al. [4–6]. The crush strength is taken as the crush load from this case, where the linear slope of the crush load-impact velocity curve as shown in Figure 13 is apparently changed (over 5%) [4]. Comparisons of crush strength ratios are summarized in Table 5. According to Table 5, the crush strength ratio, in other words, the crush strength, obtained from an FE analysis on the Zircaloy spacer grid using the base properties is overestimated by up to about 90%, while the crush strength from using the weld mechanical properties is overestimated by up to about 50%. In addition, the crush strength of the Zircaloy spacer grid obtained from the FE analyses using the weld material properties closes the gap in the test results compared to those from the analyses using the base material properties. The reason for this seems to be attributed to yielding and deforming first in the base material of the strap with a lower yield stress, while yielding in the weld zone with a higher yield stress seems to be delayed as shown in Figure 14. Consequently, for a more reliable crush strength analysis on the Zircaloy spacer grid, FE analysis considering the weld material properties is necessary instead of an FE analysis using the base material properties.Table 5
Comparisons of crush strength ratio.
Weld line (mm)
Analysis/Test
with base material properties
with weld material properties
Spot welding (2.0 mm)
1.94
1.43
Line welding (9.275 mm)
1.93
1.49
Line welding (13.28 mm)
1.90
1.51Crush load versus impact velocity.
(a)
W-spot welding
(b)
W-9.275 mm
(c)
W-13.28 mmFigure 14
Load path in a strap.Figures15 and 16 show deformed shapes of the three kinds of FE model using the base material properties and weld properties at the maximum crush load, respectively, for the sake of understanding the deformation behavior of the subsize FE models.Deformed shape using base material properties at maximum crush load.
(a)
P-spot welding
(b)
P-9.275 mm
(c)
P-13.28 mmDeformed shape using weld material properties at maximum crush load.
(a)
P-spot welding
(b)
P-9.275 mm
(c)
P-13.28 mm


## 4.1. Finite Element Modeling

When performing a crush strength test and analysis on a full-size spacer grid (16×16 array) as shown in Figure 6, it requires too much time and cost to fabricate and model the full-size spacer grid specimen. Previous research [4, 6] reported that a subsize spacer grid specimen (7×7 array) shows the crush strength tendency of the full-size spacer grid well when estimating the crush strength. Thus, as an alternative, a crush strength test and analysis on the subsize spacer grid specimen shown in Figure 7 is going to be carried out in this study. Geometric data of the subsize spacer grid are summarized in Table 4. To obtain more data for a comparison with the test and analysis results, three kinds of subsize spacer grid specimen with different weld penetration, namely, one by spot welding and two by line welding, as shown in Figure 8, have been prepared. A crush strength test was performed on 5 specimens and the average crush strength was obtained.Table 4
Geometric data for the subsize (7 × 7 array) spacer grid specimen.
Specimen (7 × 7 type)
Strap thickness (mm)
Outer strap A
Outer strap B
Inner strap
0.664
0.457
0.457Figure 6
Subsize (7×7 array) spacer grid specimen.Figure 7
Full-size (16×16 array) spacer grid specimen.Figure 8
Line welding along the intersection of straps.An FE model for predicting the crush strength of the subsize spacer grid has been established, reflecting a real test environment. Figure9 shows the FE model of the subsized spacer grid and the boundary condition. As shown in Figure 9, a rigid and mass element was used for simulating the impact hammer and all degrees of freedom were fixed at the rigid surface of the bottom side. The applied boundary condition simulated the actual test condition. The initial impact velocity at the reference node (at the center of the upper rigid surface) is applied, and the output accelerations for the initial impact velocity are obtained at this node.Figure 9
FE model of subsize (7×7 array) spacer grid.The 4-node shell elements were used for the inner/outer straps. Since the slot width in the inner straps is wider than the inner strap thickness, there may be a gap at the interconnected parts. Thus, surface-to-node contact elements were used at these interconnected parts to simulate the gap conditions. The FE model is composed of 24,448 2D linear quadrilateral shell elements. Three kinds of FE model with different weld penetration are formulated for the base material properties shown in Figure10 and for the weld material properties shown in Figure 11.FE models using base material properties.
(a)
P-spot welding
(b)
P-9.275 mm
(c)
P-13.28 mmFE models using weld material properties.
(a)
W-spot welding
(b)
W-9.275 mm
(c)
W-13.28 mm


## 4.2. Finite Element Analysis and Discussion

Crush strength analyses are carried out using a commercial FE code LS-DYNA [14]. Figure 12 shows the elastic-plastic stress-strain curve of Zircaloy-4 from the unidirectional tensile test [15]. For the crush strength analysis using the base material properties, the stress-strain curve shown in Figure 12 is used as the material properties. On the other hand, for the crush strength analysis using the weld material properties, stress-strain curves in the weld zone including weld and HAZ are generated by multiplying the stress-strain curve of Figure 12 by normalizing the factors in Table 3. The reaction force of the subsize spacer grid at each impact velocity is evaluated by multiplying the maximum acceleration of the model by the mass of the impact hammer. The reaction force, in other words, the crush load, increases as the impact velocity increases.Figure 12
Stress-strain curve of Zircaloy-4.Figure13 shows the results of crush strength analyses on the three kinds of FE model for using the base material properties and weld properties. According to Figure 13, the crush load increases and becomes saturated to the maximum values as the impact velocity increases, and the maximum crush loads using weld material properties for three FE models are about 30% lower than those using base material properties. In addition, the crush load increases as the weld line increases from spot welding (2.0 mm) to line welding of 13.28 mm due to the increase of effective height of the strap discussed by Song et al. [4–6]. The crush strength is taken as the crush load from this case, where the linear slope of the crush load-impact velocity curve as shown in Figure 13 is apparently changed (over 5%) [4]. Comparisons of crush strength ratios are summarized in Table 5. According to Table 5, the crush strength ratio, in other words, the crush strength, obtained from an FE analysis on the Zircaloy spacer grid using the base properties is overestimated by up to about 90%, while the crush strength from using the weld mechanical properties is overestimated by up to about 50%. In addition, the crush strength of the Zircaloy spacer grid obtained from the FE analyses using the weld material properties closes the gap in the test results compared to those from the analyses using the base material properties. The reason for this seems to be attributed to yielding and deforming first in the base material of the strap with a lower yield stress, while yielding in the weld zone with a higher yield stress seems to be delayed as shown in Figure 14. Consequently, for a more reliable crush strength analysis on the Zircaloy spacer grid, FE analysis considering the weld material properties is necessary instead of an FE analysis using the base material properties.Table 5
Comparisons of crush strength ratio.
Weld line (mm)
Analysis/Test
with base material properties
with weld material properties
Spot welding (2.0 mm)
1.94
1.43
Line welding (9.275 mm)
1.93
1.49
Line welding (13.28 mm)
1.90
1.51Crush load versus impact velocity.
(a)
W-spot welding
(b)
W-9.275 mm
(c)
W-13.28 mmFigure 14
Load path in a strap.Figures15 and 16 show deformed shapes of the three kinds of FE model using the base material properties and weld properties at the maximum crush load, respectively, for the sake of understanding the deformation behavior of the subsize FE models.Deformed shape using base material properties at maximum crush load.
(a)
P-spot welding
(b)
P-9.275 mm
(c)
P-13.28 mmDeformed shape using weld material properties at maximum crush load.
(a)
P-spot welding
(b)
P-9.275 mm
(c)
P-13.28 mm


## 5. Conclusions

In this study, to investigate the effects of the mechanical behavior of the spacer grid when using weld mechanical properties, strength analyses considering the weld mechanical properties obtained by an instrumented indentation technique were performed, and the analysis results were compared with the previous research using the base material properties. As a result of the analysis, the following conclusions are drawn.(1)
The crush load when using the weld material properties is about 30% lower than that when using the base material properties for a crush strength analysis of the Zircaloy spacer grid.(2)
The crush strength of the Zircaloy spacer grid obtained from the analyses using the weld material properties closes a gap in the test results compared to those from the analyses using the base material properties.(3)
Thus, for a more reliable strength analysis on the Zircaloy spacer grid, an FE analysis considering the weld material properties is necessary.



---

*Source: 540285-2012-07-25.xml*