# Fruit Morphology as Taxonomic Features in Five Varieties ofCapsicum annuum L. Solanaceae

Authors: Daniel Andrawus Zhigila; Abdullahi Alanamu AbdulRahaman; Opeyemi Saheed Kolawole; Felix A. Oladele
Journal: Journal of Botany
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

Variations in the fruit morphological features ofCapsicum annuum varieties were studied. Varieties studied include var. abbreviatum, var. annuum, var. accuminatum, var. grossum, and var. glabriusculum. The fruit morphology revealed attenuated fruit shape with rounded surfaces in var. glabriusculum, and cordate fruit shape with flexuous surface in var. annuum, abbreviatum and accuminatum. The fruit is a berry and may be green, yellow, or red when ripe. The fruit epidermal cell-wall patterns are polygonal in shape with straight and curved anticlinal walls in all the five varieties. The fruit of var. abbreviatum and var. grossum is trilocular, while that of var. accuminatum and annuum is bilocular, and that of var. glabriusculum is tetralocular. Capsicum annuum var. glabriusculum had the highest mean number of seeds (108.4) and var. annuum had the lowest number of seeds (41.3) per fruit. The fruit is conspicuously hollowed in var. glabriusculum, accuminatum, and annuum but inconspicuously hollowed in var. abbreviatum and var. grossum. These features are shown to be good taxonomic characters for delimiting the five varieties of Capsicum annuum.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Capsicum annuumL. is a domesticated species of the plant genus Capsicum in the family Solanaceae [1], native to southern North America and northern South America [2–4]. The fruit is a berry and may be green, yellow, or red when ripe [5]. There are more than 200 common names in use for this species. The most common include chilli pepper, paprika (sweet varieties); bell pepper, cayenne, jalapeños, chiltepin (hot varieties); Christmas peppers (ornamental) [4, 6]. In the past some woody forms of this species have been called C. frutescens, but the features that were used to distinguish those forms appear in many populations of C. annuum and there is no consistently recognizable C. frutescens species. [6]. Capsicum annuum can be difficult to separate from the cultivated C. chinense(the hottest pepper) and C. frutescens (tabasco pepper) and their morphological features can overlap. These three species share the same ancestral gene pool and are sometimes called the “annuum-chinense-frutescens complex” [7]. Capsicum terminology is very confusing with pepper, chilli, chile, chili, aji, paprika, and capsicum all used interchangeably to describe the plant [8, 9]. There are many local cultivars grown in West Africa. Nigeria alone has more than 200 selections of pepper [10].Sweet peppers are very often used as a bulking agent in ready-made meals and take-away food, because they are cheap, have a strong flavour, and are colourful (Janick & Paull, 2009); [11]. Its potential uses and benefits to mankind cover many areas such as food and nutrition, medicine, cosmetics, plant based insecticides (PBI), and income [12]. The colourful aspect of peppers increases the visual appeal of the food, making it more appetizing. Foods containing peppers, especially chili peppers, often have a strong aftertaste which is due to the presence of capsinoids in peppers [13]. The fruits of nonpungent (sweet) varieties are eaten raw in salads or cooked as a vegetable [14]. They are rich sources of vitamin C (ascorbic acid) and vitamin A. The dried fruits are ground to a powder (paprika) and used as an ingredient in curry powder [8].The varieties and cultivars ofCapsicum annuum are classified on the basis of their fruit shapes. Fruits form as the result of the development and differentiation of the gynoecium after fertilization. They are therefore the product of late morphological and structural modifications in the carpels [15, 16]. The genus Capsicum (sweet and hot pepper) shows intra- and inter-specific diversity in fruit type, colour, shape, taste, and biochemical content [12]. The species encompass a wide variety of shapes and sizes of peppers, both mild and hot, ranging from bell peppers to chili peppers [6]. There has been much debate amongst botanists and taxonomists as to number and classification of Capsicum species; but it is now widely accepted that the genus Capsicum consists of five domesticated species and twenty-six wild species [7]. Fruit characters have been extensively used in the taxonomy of the family  Solanaceae [17]. Excellent reviews of the application of morphological and anatomical features in systematic studies are shown in the works of Okwulehi and Okoli [18], Chakrabarty and Gupta [19], Olowokudejo [20], and Nwachukwu et al. [21].The present study assessed fruit morphological features in five varieties ofC. annuum in order to evaluate the reliability of these characters and their relevance to the taxonomic consideration of the C. annuum varieties studied.


## 2. Materials and Methods

Living fresh materials were used in this study. The fruits ofCapsicum annumvarieties were obtained from plant stands and Ipata markets in Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria. Photographs of all the specimens collected were taken with digital camera during the field trips. The specimens were identified at the herbarium of the Department of Plant Biology, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Kwara State, and authenticated at the National Center for Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria.Both qualitative and quantitative characters of fruits were used. The fruits were carefully observed for qualitative characters such as fruit type, shape, apex, surface, base, and colour and quantitative features such as fruit length, width, stalk length, and fruit index measured and recorded using standardized electronic digital callipers. The fruits were observed, measured, and recorded using 30 randomly selected fruits as suggested by Radford et al., [22]. And the ranges of variations of these characters were also noted. Terminologies used throughout were those of Pandey and Misra [23] and Olorode [24].All data were processed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT). Computer software used was SPSS version 17. A probability value of 0.05 was used as a bench mark for significant difference between parameters.


## 3. Results and Discussion

The fruit length is one of the important characteristics, which help in differentiating the varieties as small, medium, and large. The Capsicum varieties exhibited significant variability in fruit length ranging from 42.35 mm (var.abbreviatum) to 126.69 mm (var. glabriusculum). Based on this variation in fruit length, the five varieties under study were grouped into small (<50 mm) as recorded by var. abbreviatum, medium (51–100 mm) as recorded by var. annuum and accuminatum, and large (>101 mm) as recorded by var. grossum and glabriusculum. Similar classification was reported by Surendra and Singhal [25] in peas, Ravi [26] in soybean, Jain et al. [27] in mung bean, and Mate and Shelar [28] in sorghum varieties. The wide variation in fruit length might be due to variation in genetic constitution of the varieties as the fruit length is controlled by three to ten pairs of genes with heritability value of 40 to 50 per cent in Capsicum [29]. The fruit length might have also been influenced by agronomic and environmental conditions. Moreover, Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT)—one-way ANOVA—revealed the fruit length of C. annuum var. accuminatum and var. annuum to be not significantly different, while the fruit breadths of C. annuum var. glabriusculum and var. annuum are also not significantly different (Table 1). The fruit shape of C. annuum var. grossum was attenuated, that is, pointed toward the apex with rounded surfaces, while C. annuum var. annuum, var. accuminatum,var. glabriusculum, and var. abbreviatum are cordate or truncated and have flexuous (wavy) surfaces (Table 2 and Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5). This difference in the shape and surface of variety glabriusculum as suggested by Singh [30] is the most likely progenitor of the domesticated C. annuum var. annuum. Serebryanaya and Shipunov [31] reported that changes in plant morphological features in terms of variation have been attributed to small-scale evolutionary processes in different varieties of plants. The variability in fruits colour may be used to establish phylogenetic relationship among the varieties. Colour has been a major basis of differentiating Capsicum annuum varieties. The green colour in var. accuminatum does not change even in mature fruits (Abdul, pers. comm.).Table 1
Fruits morphological parameters in the varieties ofCapsicum annuum.
Taxa
Fruit length
Fruit breadth
Fruit stalk length
Fruit shape
Fruit surface
Fruit colour
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
C. annuum var.
42.35
±
3.15
35.57
±
4.12
27.94
±
3.46
Cordate
Flexuous
Red or yellow
abbreviatum
C. annuum var.
70.98
±
1.08
a
19.85
±
0.54
a
36.59
±
1.68
a
Cordate
Flexuous
Green or red
annuum
C. annuum var.
71.36
±
1.75
a
45.37
±
0.91
36.58
±
1.69
a
Cordate
Flexuous
Green
accuminatum
C. annuum var.
114.10
±
1.58
65.32
±
4.05
43.78
±
1.12
ab
Attenuate
Rounded
Red
grossum
C. annuum var.
126.69
±
4.05
19.51
±
2.05
a
44.94
±
3.68
Cordate
Rounded
Red
glabriusculum
Means with similar indices in each column are not significantly different(
P
≤
0.05
).Table 2
Fruits epidermal characters in the varieties ofCapsicum annuum.
Taxa
Epidermal cell characteristics
Length
Breadth
Size
Shape
Anticlinal wall
(μm)
(μm)
(μm)
C. annuum var.
15 (23.00) 31
13 (18.08) 25
328.51
Polygonal
Straight, curve
abbreviatum
C. annuum var.
11 (20.00) 30
10 (14.92) 20
235.74
Polygonal
Straight, curve
Annuum
C. annuum var.
13 (18.42) 24
10 (14.58) 21
212.17
Polygonal
Straight, curve
accuminatum
C. annuum var.
38 (41.90) 45
13 (16.75) 21
554.44
Polygonal
Straight, curve
Grossum
C. annuum var.
18 (21.67) 30
15 (16.50) 28
282.47
Polygonal
Straight, curve
glabriusculumFigure 1
Side view of the fruit ofCapsicum annuum var. glabriusculum.Figure 2
Side view of the fruit ofCapsicum annuum var. grossum.Figure 3
Side view of the fruit ofCapsicum annuum var. abbreviatum.Figure 4
Side view of the fruit ofCapsicum annuum var. accuminatum.Figure 5
Side view of the fruit ofCapsicum annuum var. annuum.A wide range of variability in morphology was observed in the transverse sections of these varieties (Table3 and Figures 6–10). The fruit of var. abbreviatum and var. grossum is trilocular (Figure 9), var. accuminatum and var. annuum is bilocular (Figure 7), and var. glabriusculum is tetralocular (Figure 10). This heterogeneity in the ovary chambers suggests phylogenetic diversity among these varieties. The axile placentation in all the varieties indicates that the carpel sides are fused together in septa and the ovary in Capsicum annuum is plurilocular. There are diagnostic features in the number of seeds per fruit in the varieties of Capsicum annuum. Var. grossum recorded the highest mean number of seeds (108.4) and var. annuum recorded the lowest number of seeds (41.3) per fruit. The fruit is conspicuously hollowed (Figure 8) in var. grossum, accuminatum, and annuum but inconspicuously hollowed in var. abbreviatum and var. glabriusculum (Figure 6). These variations in the fruit internal structure are probably due to the length and/or size of the fruits.Table 3
Characteristics of the fruit interior inCapsicum annuum varieties.
Taxa
Characteristics of the fruits interior
Locule
Placentation
Number of Seeds
Hollow
C. annuum var.
trilocular
Axile
43 (60.4) 81
less hollowed
abbreviatum
C. annuum var.
bilocular
Axile
39 (41.3) 44
hollowed
Annuum
C. annuum var.
bilocular
Axile
58 (73.8) 88
hollowed
accuminatum
C. annuum var.
trilocular
Axile
61 (68.5) 70
less hollowed
Grossum
C. annuum var.
tetralocular
Axile
97 (108.4) 122
hollowed
glabriusculumFigure 6
Transverse section of the fruit of var.annuum showing it inconspicuously hollowed.Figure 7
Fruit of var.accuminatum showing two fused carpels with axile placentation (bilocular).Figure 8
Transverse section of the fruit var.accuminatum showing it conspicuously hollowed.Figure 9
Fruit of three fused carpels with axile placentation (trilocular).Figure 10
Fruit of four fused carpels with axile placentation (tetralocular).These distinguishing fruit morphological features observed in these investigations are of systematic value because they are consistently different in the taxa studied. Furthermore, the use of fruit features in systematics is an important taxonomic tool at the levels of family, genus, species, and variety. Works of Mulla et al. [32], Filippa and Bernardello [33], Olmstead et al. [34], Cutler et al. [15], and Pabón-Mora and Litt [17] are typical examples.Based on the features observed above, the following dichotomous key has been developed to allow for separation of the five varieties ofCapsicum annuumstudied in this work:(1a) fruit shape cordate, fruit internal structure, conspicuously hollowed,—2
(2a) fruit surface flexuous, fruit small or medium,—3
(3a) fruit colour red or yellow, fruit small, trilocular,—abbreviatum
(3b) fruit colour green or red, fruit medium, bilocular,—annuum
(2b) fruit surface rounded, fruit large,—grossum
(1b) fruit shape attenuate, fruit internal structure inconspicuously hollowed,—4
(4a) fruit colour green, number of seeds low,—accuminatum
(4b) fruit colour red, number of seeds high,—glabriusculum



---

*Source: 540868-2014-02-17.xml*