# Preparation and Characterization of Nano-Polyaniline Film on ITO Conductive Glass by Electrochemical Polymerization

Authors: Qi Qin; Yunxia Guo
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

Polyaniline (PANI) films were synthesized on a conducting ITO glass by potentiostatic techniques to construct a low-cost counter electrode for dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC). The compact layer, nanoparticles, nanorods- and fibrils were observed on the top of PANI films with different constant potentials by SEM. Then the conductivity test illuminated that a polyaniline film with the highest conductivity was electrodeposited at 1.0 V. Finally, the photoelectric measurement showed that the energy conversion efficiency of DSSC with the PANI electrode was increased with the potential decreasing. And the efficiency of DSSC with PANI counter electrode at 1.0 V was higher than that with Pt electrode, owing to the high surface area, high conductivity, and excellent catalytic activity of PANI electrode. Therefore, the PANI counter electrode with excellent catalytic performance is a potential substitute for platinized electrode to save cost of DSSC.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Dye-sensitized solar cells have been one of the most promising photovoltaic devices due to their high conversion efficiency and low cost. In general, a DSSC comprises a dye-sensitized titanium dioxide (TiO2) electrode, an iodide/triiodide redox electrolyte solution, and a counter electrode (CE). The function of the CE is to transfer electrons from the external circuit back to the redox electrolyte and to catalyze the reduction of the triiodide ion [1–4]. Usually, a Pt electrode formed on a transparent conductive glass substrate is used as the CE for DSSC. Although Pt exhibits excellent catalytic activity for triiodide reduction and good electric conductivity, it is extremely expensive and has the problem of reserves for large-scale application [5, 6]. Meanwhile, the shape limitation will bring transport problem for the Pt counter electrode. Future large solar electric conversion systems will prefer materials abundantly available and easily handled. Therefore, it is necessary to develop cheap materials for CEs which also exhibit high electrical conductivity, good chemical stability, and good catalytic activity to the reduction of triiodide ion.So far, inexpensive carbonaceous materials and conducting polymers such as graphite, carbon black, carbon nanotube, graphene, poly(3,4-propylenedioxythiophene) (PProDOT), and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) have been employed as the catalytic materials on indium tin oxide (ITO) glass for the CEs. Yen et al. reported a DSSC using the carbon nanotube composite plate had a cell efficiency of 4.73% [7]. Meanwhile, Saito et al. used chemically polymerized PEDOT on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass as the counter electrodes and obtained a conversion efficiency of 3.6% under 100 mWcm−2 [8]. Fukuri and coworkers also developed PEDOT-based solid-state electrolytes, but the cell efficiencies were <1% [9].Recently, the conducting PANI was applied as the counter electrode materials for DSSC to replace the platinized counter electrode due to its easy synthesis, high conductivity, and unique redox properties [10]. Among the previous research, the electrode with a layer of conductive PANI coated on conducting glass is achieved by using several methods, such as the spreading of a solution of conductive polymer on the surface of the material followed by the evaporation of the solvent [11], the in situ chemical polymerization, and then deposition on the surfaces of various materials immersed in the polymerization solution [12] or the electropolymerization of the monomers on an electrode [13–16]. Wu et al. researched on using polyaniline [5] or polypyrrole [6] as counter electrode in DSSCs by the vertical dip-tugging method [17, 18]. Moreover, it was reported that PANI was deposited on the surface of ITO conductive glass by in situ chemical polymerization [19], and the energy conversion efficiency of DSSC with PANI counter electrode reached 2.64%. However, these methods were difficult to obtain a homogeneous and compact film owing to the insolubility or poor solubility of PANI in nearly all solvents [20].Hence, the method of electropolymerization to prepare a compact film of polyaniline is considered in this study. The PANI counter electrodes are prepared on the surface of conducting glass by using potentiostatic techniques, and the photoelectric performances of DSSC with these electrodes are also discussed.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Materials

Aniline (An, analytical grade from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd) was purified by distillation under reduced pressure prior to usage. Analytical-grade reagents, H2SO4, iodine, lithium perchlorate, acetonitrile, ethanol, and acetone (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd), were used without any pretreatment. All solutions were prepared from deionized water. ITO glasses from the Institute of Plasma Physics (CAS) were used as the substrates. Anhydrous lithium iodide, 4-tert-butylpyridine, 1-methyl-3-propylimidazolium iodide, methoxypropionitrile were provided by Fluka Chemical Corporation. TiO2 colloid and dye N719 were the commercial product purchased from Solaronix SA (Switzerland). Pt counter electrode bought from Dyesol Limited was used in the contrast test.


### 2.2. Preparation of PANI Electrode

ITO glasses were rinsed with deionized water and immersed in ethanol ultrasonically for 15 min, then immersed in acetone ultrasonically for 15 min before PANI electropolymerization. One ITO glass sheet was used as working electrode for PANI deposition. The deposited area was 1 cm2 with other area insulated by an adhesive tape coating. A Pt sheet was used as the counter electrode. PANI was electrodeposited on the surface of ITO glass by potentiostatic method at different constant potential (1.0 V, 1.1 V, 1.2 V, and 1.3 V) for 500 s in a 0.2 M aniline/0.5 M sulphuric acid (H2SO4) electrolyte solution. Finally, PANI-modified glass electrode was immersed in 0.5 M H2SO4 statically in order to expel aniline monomer and oligomer PANI from the polymeric film and then rinsed with deionized water and ethanol for several times and dried in a vacuum at 60°C for 24 h.


### 2.3. Assembling of DSSCs

Nano-TiO2 colloid was dropped on the ITO glass plate by a doctor scraping technique to form a porous film. Then the TiO2 porous film was sintered by annealing at 450°C for 30 min. After cooling to 100°C, the TiO2 film was immersed in an ethanol solution of N719 dye for 24 h. Finally, DSSC was assembled by injecting a drop of electrolyte with I2, LiI, 1-methyl-3-propylimidazolium iodide, 4-tert-butylpyridine in methoxypropionitrile into the aperture between the TiO2 porous film electrode and the PANI electrode.


### 2.4. Measurement and Characterization

The SEM image of the sample was performed using a scanning electron microscopy (LEO1550, GER). FTIR spectrum of the PANI was recorded in the range of 500–4000 cm−1 using FTIR spectroscopy (Perkin Elmer 1760, USA). The conductivity of PANI was measured by manual four probe instrument (MP 1008, WENTWORTH, UK). Photocurrent-voltage characteristics of the DSSCs were obtained by a Keithley model 2400 digital source meter using an Oriel 91192 solar simulator equipped with AM 1.5 filter and intensity of 100 mW/cm2. All the polymerization experiments were performed on an electrochemical workstation (CHI660A, CHInstrument, CHN).


## 2.1. Materials

Aniline (An, analytical grade from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd) was purified by distillation under reduced pressure prior to usage. Analytical-grade reagents, H2SO4, iodine, lithium perchlorate, acetonitrile, ethanol, and acetone (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd), were used without any pretreatment. All solutions were prepared from deionized water. ITO glasses from the Institute of Plasma Physics (CAS) were used as the substrates. Anhydrous lithium iodide, 4-tert-butylpyridine, 1-methyl-3-propylimidazolium iodide, methoxypropionitrile were provided by Fluka Chemical Corporation. TiO2 colloid and dye N719 were the commercial product purchased from Solaronix SA (Switzerland). Pt counter electrode bought from Dyesol Limited was used in the contrast test.


## 2.2. Preparation of PANI Electrode

ITO glasses were rinsed with deionized water and immersed in ethanol ultrasonically for 15 min, then immersed in acetone ultrasonically for 15 min before PANI electropolymerization. One ITO glass sheet was used as working electrode for PANI deposition. The deposited area was 1 cm2 with other area insulated by an adhesive tape coating. A Pt sheet was used as the counter electrode. PANI was electrodeposited on the surface of ITO glass by potentiostatic method at different constant potential (1.0 V, 1.1 V, 1.2 V, and 1.3 V) for 500 s in a 0.2 M aniline/0.5 M sulphuric acid (H2SO4) electrolyte solution. Finally, PANI-modified glass electrode was immersed in 0.5 M H2SO4 statically in order to expel aniline monomer and oligomer PANI from the polymeric film and then rinsed with deionized water and ethanol for several times and dried in a vacuum at 60°C for 24 h.


## 2.3. Assembling of DSSCs

Nano-TiO2 colloid was dropped on the ITO glass plate by a doctor scraping technique to form a porous film. Then the TiO2 porous film was sintered by annealing at 450°C for 30 min. After cooling to 100°C, the TiO2 film was immersed in an ethanol solution of N719 dye for 24 h. Finally, DSSC was assembled by injecting a drop of electrolyte with I2, LiI, 1-methyl-3-propylimidazolium iodide, 4-tert-butylpyridine in methoxypropionitrile into the aperture between the TiO2 porous film electrode and the PANI electrode.


## 2.4. Measurement and Characterization

The SEM image of the sample was performed using a scanning electron microscopy (LEO1550, GER). FTIR spectrum of the PANI was recorded in the range of 500–4000 cm−1 using FTIR spectroscopy (Perkin Elmer 1760, USA). The conductivity of PANI was measured by manual four probe instrument (MP 1008, WENTWORTH, UK). Photocurrent-voltage characteristics of the DSSCs were obtained by a Keithley model 2400 digital source meter using an Oriel 91192 solar simulator equipped with AM 1.5 filter and intensity of 100 mW/cm2. All the polymerization experiments were performed on an electrochemical workstation (CHI660A, CHInstrument, CHN).


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Micromorphology of PANI

The photograph of the polyaniline films electrodeposited at 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 V on the ITO substrate is shown in Figure1. It can be seen the emerald PANI thin layer is deposited on glass from Figure 1(a). With the electropolymerization potential rising, the thickness of PANI layer has a significant increase, and the color of PANI film becomes darker and darker. The PANI film electrodeposited at 1.3 V closes to dark green.The photograph of PANI films electrodeposited at (a) 1.0, (b) 1.1, (c) 1.2, (d) 1.3 V.
(a)(b)(c)(d)Figure2 shows the SEM images of PANI electrodes at different constant potentials. At the low potential (1.0 V), PANI nuclei grow on the bare electrode to form a compact layer, which adhered to the electrode surface strongly. Increasing the potential to 1.1 V, some PANI particles with the diameter in range of 800 nm appear on the top of PANI nodules layer. As the potential shifts to more positive potential, the PANI particles disappear and the nanorods emerge on the surface of PANI film. At 1.2 V, PANI mainly forms the short nanorods with the length of 500 nm and with the diameter of 100 nm. At the higher potential, the PANI deposition shows an extensive fibril growth. At 1.3 V, PANI forms the long fibril with the length of 1 μm and with the diameter of 100 nm. This growth of PANI has no directional alignment, and the nanorods or fibrils are nonuniform. It is clearly demonstrated that the formation of thick, short nanorods is preferred at low polymerization potential while the development of thin, long fibrils is more easily achieved at higher potential.SEM images of polyaniline electrodeposited at (a) 1.0 V, (b) 1.1 V, (c) 1.2 V, (d) 1.3 V.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


### 3.2. Molecular Structure of PANI

Figure3 shows the FTIR spectra of PANI deposited on conductive glass at different potentials. It is clear that the characteristic peaks of polyaniline (KBr, thin film, cm−1) present near the wavenumbers of 1561 (C–C stretching mode for the quinoid ring), 1484 (benzenoid rings vibration), 1295 (C–N stretching mode), 1240 (C–N+ stretching vibration), 1077 (a vibration mode of the –NH+= structure), and 792 (out-of-plane bending vibration of C–H) cm−1 [21–27]. As the potential reaches to 1.3 V, the characteristic peaks of PANI become stronger, and the band intensity significantly enhances with the gradual rise of constant potential. It indicates that the PANI can be formed by potentiostatic polymerization at 1.0 V, and the more PANI obtained with the potential increasing can make the peak intensity of PANI stronger.Figure 3
FTIR spectrum of PANI at (a) 1.0 V, (b) 1.1 V, (c) 1.2 V, (d) 1.3 V.


### 3.3. Conductivity Measurement

The conductivity of PANI deposited at different potentials is measured by four-point probes instrument and then calculated by this equation:(1)σ=ln⁡2πd⋅I12U34,
where σ is the conductivity, d is the thickness of films, I12 is the current from 1 to 2 points, and U34 is the potential difference between 3 and 4 points. The schematic diagram of four-point probes method is shown in Figure 4.Figure 4
The schematic diagram of four-point probes method.Meanwhile, polymer thickness is estimated from the amount of chargeQA according to the equation [28]:(2)d=QAMwzFAρ,
where QA is the charge under the potentiostatic electrodeposition, Mw is molecular weight of aniline, z=0.5 (number of electrons/aniline unit), A is area of the electrode, ρ is specific density of aniline, and F is Faraday’s constant. Table 1 presents the thickness and the conductivity of PANI layers at 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 V. It can be found that the film thickness of PANI increases with the polymerization potential increasing, but the conductivity of PANI decreases. As the potential is 1.0 V, the PANI film is very thin (about 33 nm). With the polymerization potential rising, the current density on the PANI/glass electrode is increased, leading to the thickness of PANI film increased also; however, the more thickness of PANI film results in the reduction of conductivity. The best conductivity of PANI deposited on conducting glass substrate reached to 62.59 S/cm when the polymerization potential was 1.0 V. Otherwise, the increase of current density on the PANI/glass electrode caused by the rise of potential leads to the peroxidation of PANI, and the conducting emeraldine form is converted into a nonconducting full-oxidation state. This transformation process among the different redox states of PANI also results in the reduction of conductivity.Table 1
The thickness and conductivity of PANI films under different potential.
SampleThicknessd [μm]Conductivityσ [S/cm]PANI-1.0 V0.03362.59PANI-1.1 V0.21242.97PANI-1.2 V0.65125.18PANI-1.3 V1.36710.41


### 3.4. Photoelectric Performance of PANI Electrode

The photoelectric properties of DSSCs with PANI/glass and Pt counter electrode are shown in Figure5, and the results are also listed in Table 2. The result indicates that the PANI/glass electrode deposited at low potential (1.0 V) with the high conductivity and electrocatalytic activity can obtain the best photoelectric conversion efficiency, which reaches to 5.68%. This photoelectric conversion efficiency of DSSC with PANI counter electrode is higher than that with Pt electrode (4.51%), and the fill factor (FF) is about 0.488, which is higher than Pt electrode (0.483). This improvement of the photoelectric efficiency is referred to the PANI electrode with the higher surface area, the higher electrocatalytic activity, and the lower charge-transfer resistance, compared to Pt electrode. Moreover, with the potential rising from 1.0 to 1.3 V, the FF has a little change, the Jsc of DSSC with PANI counter electrode has a remarkable decrease, and the energy conversion efficiency of DSSC with PANI electrode descends from 5.68% to 4.03%. It is due to the reduction of the conductivity and increase of the charge transmission impedance of PANI electrode with the polymerization potential increasing. As a result, the new PANI counter electrode prepared by electrochemical synthesis method has more predominant photoelectric performance than Pt electrode. Thus, the PANI counter electrode can replace the conventional Pt counter electrode for reducing the production cost of DSSC.Table 2
Photovoltaic performance of DSSCs with different PANI and Pt counter electrode.
ElectrodeJSC [mA/cm2]VOC [mV]FFEfficiency [%]PANI-1.0 V16.187200.4885.68PANI-1.1 V15.567400.4765.48PANI-1.2 V15.197000.4664.95PANI-1.3 V13.496200.4824.03Pt14.606400.4834.51Figure 5
Photoelectric properties of DSSCs with different PANI and Pt counter electrodes.


## 3.1. Micromorphology of PANI

The photograph of the polyaniline films electrodeposited at 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 V on the ITO substrate is shown in Figure1. It can be seen the emerald PANI thin layer is deposited on glass from Figure 1(a). With the electropolymerization potential rising, the thickness of PANI layer has a significant increase, and the color of PANI film becomes darker and darker. The PANI film electrodeposited at 1.3 V closes to dark green.The photograph of PANI films electrodeposited at (a) 1.0, (b) 1.1, (c) 1.2, (d) 1.3 V.
(a)(b)(c)(d)Figure2 shows the SEM images of PANI electrodes at different constant potentials. At the low potential (1.0 V), PANI nuclei grow on the bare electrode to form a compact layer, which adhered to the electrode surface strongly. Increasing the potential to 1.1 V, some PANI particles with the diameter in range of 800 nm appear on the top of PANI nodules layer. As the potential shifts to more positive potential, the PANI particles disappear and the nanorods emerge on the surface of PANI film. At 1.2 V, PANI mainly forms the short nanorods with the length of 500 nm and with the diameter of 100 nm. At the higher potential, the PANI deposition shows an extensive fibril growth. At 1.3 V, PANI forms the long fibril with the length of 1 μm and with the diameter of 100 nm. This growth of PANI has no directional alignment, and the nanorods or fibrils are nonuniform. It is clearly demonstrated that the formation of thick, short nanorods is preferred at low polymerization potential while the development of thin, long fibrils is more easily achieved at higher potential.SEM images of polyaniline electrodeposited at (a) 1.0 V, (b) 1.1 V, (c) 1.2 V, (d) 1.3 V.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


## 3.2. Molecular Structure of PANI

Figure3 shows the FTIR spectra of PANI deposited on conductive glass at different potentials. It is clear that the characteristic peaks of polyaniline (KBr, thin film, cm−1) present near the wavenumbers of 1561 (C–C stretching mode for the quinoid ring), 1484 (benzenoid rings vibration), 1295 (C–N stretching mode), 1240 (C–N+ stretching vibration), 1077 (a vibration mode of the –NH+= structure), and 792 (out-of-plane bending vibration of C–H) cm−1 [21–27]. As the potential reaches to 1.3 V, the characteristic peaks of PANI become stronger, and the band intensity significantly enhances with the gradual rise of constant potential. It indicates that the PANI can be formed by potentiostatic polymerization at 1.0 V, and the more PANI obtained with the potential increasing can make the peak intensity of PANI stronger.Figure 3
FTIR spectrum of PANI at (a) 1.0 V, (b) 1.1 V, (c) 1.2 V, (d) 1.3 V.


## 3.3. Conductivity Measurement

The conductivity of PANI deposited at different potentials is measured by four-point probes instrument and then calculated by this equation:(1)σ=ln⁡2πd⋅I12U34,
where σ is the conductivity, d is the thickness of films, I12 is the current from 1 to 2 points, and U34 is the potential difference between 3 and 4 points. The schematic diagram of four-point probes method is shown in Figure 4.Figure 4
The schematic diagram of four-point probes method.Meanwhile, polymer thickness is estimated from the amount of chargeQA according to the equation [28]:(2)d=QAMwzFAρ,
where QA is the charge under the potentiostatic electrodeposition, Mw is molecular weight of aniline, z=0.5 (number of electrons/aniline unit), A is area of the electrode, ρ is specific density of aniline, and F is Faraday’s constant. Table 1 presents the thickness and the conductivity of PANI layers at 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 V. It can be found that the film thickness of PANI increases with the polymerization potential increasing, but the conductivity of PANI decreases. As the potential is 1.0 V, the PANI film is very thin (about 33 nm). With the polymerization potential rising, the current density on the PANI/glass electrode is increased, leading to the thickness of PANI film increased also; however, the more thickness of PANI film results in the reduction of conductivity. The best conductivity of PANI deposited on conducting glass substrate reached to 62.59 S/cm when the polymerization potential was 1.0 V. Otherwise, the increase of current density on the PANI/glass electrode caused by the rise of potential leads to the peroxidation of PANI, and the conducting emeraldine form is converted into a nonconducting full-oxidation state. This transformation process among the different redox states of PANI also results in the reduction of conductivity.Table 1
The thickness and conductivity of PANI films under different potential.
SampleThicknessd [μm]Conductivityσ [S/cm]PANI-1.0 V0.03362.59PANI-1.1 V0.21242.97PANI-1.2 V0.65125.18PANI-1.3 V1.36710.41


## 3.4. Photoelectric Performance of PANI Electrode

The photoelectric properties of DSSCs with PANI/glass and Pt counter electrode are shown in Figure5, and the results are also listed in Table 2. The result indicates that the PANI/glass electrode deposited at low potential (1.0 V) with the high conductivity and electrocatalytic activity can obtain the best photoelectric conversion efficiency, which reaches to 5.68%. This photoelectric conversion efficiency of DSSC with PANI counter electrode is higher than that with Pt electrode (4.51%), and the fill factor (FF) is about 0.488, which is higher than Pt electrode (0.483). This improvement of the photoelectric efficiency is referred to the PANI electrode with the higher surface area, the higher electrocatalytic activity, and the lower charge-transfer resistance, compared to Pt electrode. Moreover, with the potential rising from 1.0 to 1.3 V, the FF has a little change, the Jsc of DSSC with PANI counter electrode has a remarkable decrease, and the energy conversion efficiency of DSSC with PANI electrode descends from 5.68% to 4.03%. It is due to the reduction of the conductivity and increase of the charge transmission impedance of PANI electrode with the polymerization potential increasing. As a result, the new PANI counter electrode prepared by electrochemical synthesis method has more predominant photoelectric performance than Pt electrode. Thus, the PANI counter electrode can replace the conventional Pt counter electrode for reducing the production cost of DSSC.Table 2
Photovoltaic performance of DSSCs with different PANI and Pt counter electrode.
ElectrodeJSC [mA/cm2]VOC [mV]FFEfficiency [%]PANI-1.0 V16.187200.4885.68PANI-1.1 V15.567400.4765.48PANI-1.2 V15.197000.4664.95PANI-1.3 V13.496200.4824.03Pt14.606400.4834.51Figure 5
Photoelectric properties of DSSCs with different PANI and Pt counter electrodes.


## 4. Summary

In summary, the PANI counter electrode was successfully fabricated on conducting ITO glass by electrochemical polymerization method. The results showed that the compact layers, nanoparticles, nanorods, and fibrils of PANI successively grew on the surface of glass as the potential rising from 1.0 V to 1.3 V. The conductivity and photoelectric test indicated that the optimal constant potential of PANI electrodeposition is 1.0 V. The energy conversion efficiency of DSSC with PANI counter electrode at 1.0 V reached 5.68%, which was higher than Pt electrode. This improvement corresponds to higher conductivity, higher electrocatalytic activity, and smaller charge-transfer resistance of PANI electrode. Therefore, the PANI counter electrode with the simple preparation procedure, low fabrication cost, and excellent catalytic properties will be a credible alternative of the counter electrode from DSSCs in the future.



---

*Source: 519674-2012-02-20.xml*