# Design and Analysis of a Novel Dual Band-Notched UWB Antenna

Authors: Ronghua Shi; Xi Xu; Jian Dong; Qingping Luo
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

A novel ultrawide band (UWB) antenna with dual band-notched characteristics is presented. The first band rejection is provided by an arc H-shaped slot on the radiating patch. The parametric study of the arc H-shaped slot shows that this structure enables rejectband characteristic with improved control compared to traditional H-shaped slot. Based on the single band-notched UWB antenna, the second notched band is realized by etching narrow slots on the ground plane. By tuning the parameters of these slots, the proposed UWB antenna can operate from 2.9 GHz to above 10 GHz, except for the bandwidth of 3.3–3.6 GHz for WiMAX application and 5.1–5.9 GHz for WLAN application. Simulated and measured results show that the proposed antenna provides excellent band rejection and is a good candidate for future UWB application.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Since commercial ultrawide band (UWB) systems which work from 3.1 GHz to 10.6 GHz are allowed by Federal Communication Commission (FCC) [1], the technology of UWB is concerned by academia and industry due to its candidate for various applications. As an essential part of the UWB system, the UWB antenna, has drawn heavy attention from researchers. Due to broad bandwidth, low cost, and good radiation characteristic, the global approaches of UWB antenna [2–4] are increasing quickly.In order to avoid interference of service that work in the UWB band, such as the subband 5.1–5.9 GHz for WLAN band and WiMAX operating in the 3.3–3.6 GHz, the UWB antenna with band-notched function is desirable. Various methods for designing band-notched UWB antenna have been presented and reported. Designs of using parasitic stubs as resonators to achieve band-notched function were presented in [5–8]. In [5], single band-notched and multiband-notched antennas have been implemented by integrating wideband planar monopole antennas with various types of microstrip resonator. In [6], band-notched function of the circle ring antenna was achieved by introducing a tuning stub inside the ring monopole. A monopole antenna with band-notched function using a complex resonator was presented in [7]. A printed monopole antenna with controllable band-notched performance for UWB applications was presented in [8]. Its band-notched characteristic is achieved by embedding two shorted rectangular resonators.In the designs above, the structure of these antennas cannot be compact enough due to the use of parasitic stubs as resonators. In order to make the structure of the band-notched antenna more compact, etching slots such as C-shaped, T-shaped, E-shaped, and H-shaped slots on the radiating patch or on the ground plane were used to achieve band-notched function [9–15]. Designs of single band-notched UWB antennas were presented in [9–13]. In [9], the characteristics of the on-ground band-notched structures were analyzed in detail providing designers with useful information and flexibility for the realization of specialized band-notched antennas. In [10], characteristic modes have been used to analyze the behavior of an UWB antenna with a narrowband slot embedded in its planar geometry. It has been shown that the notched-band is caused by the slot resonance, and the intensity of the rejection depends on how much the current distribution of different antenna modes is disturbed. By using a modified shovel-shaped defected ground structure, a band-notched characteristic is achieved in [11]. A frequency-reconfigurable planar antenna with two inverted S-shaped slots was presented in [12]. This antenna can be widely used in the dual-band WLAN systems and the UWB systems. In addition, a complete design method for a compact uniplanar UWB antenna with subband rejection capability is presented in [13]. In order to avoid the interference from services which work in different frequency band, dual band-notched UWB antennas were presented [14, 15]. In [14], the dual band-notched function was achieved by etching one quasi-complementary split-ring resonator in the feed line. In [15], by cutting two L-shaped slits and an E-shaped slot with variable dimensions on the radiating patch dual band-notch characteristics generated and also by inserting a V-shaped strip on the ground plane, additional resonances were excited, and hence much wider impedance bandwidth was produced, especially at the higher band.The designed antennas above feature wide operating bandwidth and good band-notched function, but they lack powerful control of tuning the centre frequency of the notched-band. To overcome this weakness of the above designs, a novel UWB antenna with dual band-notched characteristics is proposed in this paper by employing an arc H-shaped slot on the radiating patch and etching narrow slots on the ground plane. The proposed antenna can operate within an ultrawide band from 2.9 GHz to above 10 GHz. At the same time, the antenna can avoid the interference from WiMAX and WLAN applications. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section2, the antenna design is first discussed. The simulation is carried out using Ansoft High Frequency Structure Simulator (HFSS). In Section 3, advantages of the arc H-shaped slot compared with traditional H-shaped slot are presented. In Section 4, simulation and measurement results are presented to validate the performance of the proposed antenna. Finally, the conclusion is provided in Section 5.


## 2. Antenna Design

### 2.1. Single Band-Notched UWB Antenna Design

#### 2.1.1.  UWB Antenna

As shown in Figure1. The referance antenna [4] uses FR4 substrate with the dimensions of  35.5 × 30 × 1.6 mm3, relative permittivity εr=4.4. The antenna is fed by a CPW line which is designed for 50 Ohm characteristic impedance. Figure 1(a) shows the top view of the antenna; the planar circular disc monopole is fabricated on the substrate. The radius of the radiating patch is R (R = 10 mm), and the width of the feed line is Wg (Wg = 3 mm). Figure 1(b) shows the rear of the antenna; the length of the ground plane is L1 (L1 = 15 mm). The top corners with the parameter G (G=5mm) are removed to improve the bandwidth of the antenna [4]. Two rectangular slots are removed to adjust the antenna impedance and reduce the return loss [4]. Hs (Hs = 3 mm) and Ws (Ws = 5 mm) denote the length and width of the rectangular slots, respectively. The ground plane is reshaped as letter “T”, for Wt = 12 mm, Ht = 4 mm. The simulated VSWR result of the UWB antenna is shown in Figure 2; it can be seen that the antenna could operate from 3.5 GHz to above 12 GHz with VSWR less than 2.Geometry of the UWB antenna: (a) top view, (b) bottom view.
(a)
(b)Figure 2
Simulated VSWR of the UWB antenna.


#### 2.1.2. Single Band-Notched UWB Antenna

Before developing the dual band-notched UWB antennas, we need to investigate the method generating the single notched band. In order to achieve band-notched function, we employ an arc H-shaped slot on the circular radiating patch. The arc H-shaped slot is removed from the centre of the radiating patch. As shown in Figure3, the shape of the slot is designed as an arc letter “H.” RH denotes the radius of the outer circular arc. LH0 denotes the distance between outer arc and inner arc. The simulation is carried out using HFSS. The optimized slot dimensions are as follows: RH = 8 mm, LH0 = 3.2 mm, LH1 = 2 mm, and α=π/4. It can be seen in Figure 4 that the simulated VSWR of the antenna is larger than 2 from 3.2 GHz to 4.2 GHz acting as a stopband, meaning that this antenna can avoid the interference from IEEE 802.16 WiMAX application.Figure 3
Geometry of the arc H-shaped slot.Figure 4
Simulated VSWR of the single band-notched antenna.The simulated results of surface current distribution for the antenna at the passband (3.2 GHz, 5 GHz) and at the rejectband (3.7 GHz) are given in Figure5. It can be seen that the surface current distribution is very strong at the feed line and the surface current is highly concentrated at the arc H-shaped slot in Figure 5(b), but the situations are different in Figures 5(a) and 5(c). These clearly show the positive effects of the slot upon obtaining the band-notched characteristics. It is noted that the UWB antenna cannot work at the stopband (3.7 GHz) because of the effect of the arc H-shaped slot resonator. The impedance Z of the antenna versus frequency is given in Figure 6 to show the band-notched function of this antenna. The input resistance should be around 50 Ohm and the input reactance should be around 0 Ohm when the antenna is operating at the passband. At the stopband, their values largely deviate from the nominal values.Surface current distribution of the antenna: (a) 3.2 GHz, (b) 3.7 GHz, and (c) 5 GHz.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 6
ImpedanceZ of the antenna versus frequency.


### 2.2. Dual Band-Notched UWB Antenna Design

The high frequency band-notched function is designed to avoid the other band such as WLAN operating from 5.1 to 5.9 GHz. To achieve this function, we etch a couple of narrow slots on the ground plane. Figure7 shows the geometry of the antenna; the top view of this antenna and the slots on the ground plane are given in Figures 7(a) and 7(b), respectively. The simulated results show that the optimized slot dimensions are as follows: Wd = 0.5 mm, Ld = 7.5 mm, and S = 0.2 mm. The VSWR result is shown in Figure 8; it can be seen that the antenna could not operate from 5.1 GHz to 6 GHz as a stopband. The centre frequency of the stopband, given the dimensions of the band-notched feature, can be postulated as [16]
(1)fnotch=c4L′(εr+1)/2.Geometry of the high frequency band-notched antenna: (a) top view, (b) narrow slot on the ground plane.
(a)
(b)Figure 8
Simulated VSWR of the high frequency band-notched UWB antenna.LetL′ = Ld + Wd; εr is the effective dielectric constant, and c is the speed of light. The lengths of the slot have great effects on the band rejection performance and should be tuned carefully. By varying the length of parameter Ld, we could control the length of L′ to tune the centre frequency of the stopband.Based on the single band-notched UWB antenna, the dual band-notched function is investigated, and the geometry of the antenna is given in Figure9. Figure 10 shows the simulated VSWR result of the dual band-notched UWB antennap; it can be observed that the proposed antenna bandwidth with good stopband rejection, the band-notched characteristic of low frequency formed by the arc H-shaped slot on the radiating patch, and the band-notched characteristic of high frequency formed by the narrow slots on the ground plane hardly interfere with each other. Figure 11 shows that the centre frequency of the stopband shifts down as Ld increases. The impedance Z of the dual band-notched UWB antenna is displayed in Figure 12, which shows that the input resistance and the input reactance keep the nominal value when the antenna working on the passband. It shows that the proposed antenna is suitable for UWB applications.Figure 9
Geometry of the proposed antenna.Figure 10
Simulated VSWR result of the proposed antenna.Figure 11
Effect of length of the narrow slot.Figure 12
ImpedanceZ of the proposed antenna versus frequency.According to the impedanceZ of the dual band-notched UWB antenna shown in Figure 12, the approximate equivalent circuit of the proposed antenna is presented in Figure 13. The arc H-shaped slot on the radiating patch and narrow slots on the ground plane can be modeled by two circuit-resonance stubs at different positions in a transmission line model. At the passband, neither of the stubs has any effect in generating notched bands. On the 3.7 GHz band-notched characteristic, stub 1 makes the circuit resonate. Therefore, stub 1 behaves as a parallel resonator with an unusual input impedance Z (i.e., the input resistance is much larger than 50 Ohm, and the input reactance is not equal to 0 Ohm), causing a total impedance mismatch between the feed line and the radiating patch. As a result, VSWR of the antenna in this frequency band becomes greater, and the first notched band is created. On the 5.7 GHz band-notched characteristic, stub 2 works similarly as stub 1. The input impedance Z becomes unusual; stub 2 operates as a parallel resonator in the circuit. Essentially, the dual band-notched function is achieved by these resonators.Figure 13
Approximate equivalent circuit of the proposed antenna.


## 2.1. Single Band-Notched UWB Antenna Design

### 2.1.1.  UWB Antenna

As shown in Figure1. The referance antenna [4] uses FR4 substrate with the dimensions of  35.5 × 30 × 1.6 mm3, relative permittivity εr=4.4. The antenna is fed by a CPW line which is designed for 50 Ohm characteristic impedance. Figure 1(a) shows the top view of the antenna; the planar circular disc monopole is fabricated on the substrate. The radius of the radiating patch is R (R = 10 mm), and the width of the feed line is Wg (Wg = 3 mm). Figure 1(b) shows the rear of the antenna; the length of the ground plane is L1 (L1 = 15 mm). The top corners with the parameter G (G=5mm) are removed to improve the bandwidth of the antenna [4]. Two rectangular slots are removed to adjust the antenna impedance and reduce the return loss [4]. Hs (Hs = 3 mm) and Ws (Ws = 5 mm) denote the length and width of the rectangular slots, respectively. The ground plane is reshaped as letter “T”, for Wt = 12 mm, Ht = 4 mm. The simulated VSWR result of the UWB antenna is shown in Figure 2; it can be seen that the antenna could operate from 3.5 GHz to above 12 GHz with VSWR less than 2.Geometry of the UWB antenna: (a) top view, (b) bottom view.
(a)
(b)Figure 2
Simulated VSWR of the UWB antenna.


### 2.1.2. Single Band-Notched UWB Antenna

Before developing the dual band-notched UWB antennas, we need to investigate the method generating the single notched band. In order to achieve band-notched function, we employ an arc H-shaped slot on the circular radiating patch. The arc H-shaped slot is removed from the centre of the radiating patch. As shown in Figure3, the shape of the slot is designed as an arc letter “H.” RH denotes the radius of the outer circular arc. LH0 denotes the distance between outer arc and inner arc. The simulation is carried out using HFSS. The optimized slot dimensions are as follows: RH = 8 mm, LH0 = 3.2 mm, LH1 = 2 mm, and α=π/4. It can be seen in Figure 4 that the simulated VSWR of the antenna is larger than 2 from 3.2 GHz to 4.2 GHz acting as a stopband, meaning that this antenna can avoid the interference from IEEE 802.16 WiMAX application.Figure 3
Geometry of the arc H-shaped slot.Figure 4
Simulated VSWR of the single band-notched antenna.The simulated results of surface current distribution for the antenna at the passband (3.2 GHz, 5 GHz) and at the rejectband (3.7 GHz) are given in Figure5. It can be seen that the surface current distribution is very strong at the feed line and the surface current is highly concentrated at the arc H-shaped slot in Figure 5(b), but the situations are different in Figures 5(a) and 5(c). These clearly show the positive effects of the slot upon obtaining the band-notched characteristics. It is noted that the UWB antenna cannot work at the stopband (3.7 GHz) because of the effect of the arc H-shaped slot resonator. The impedance Z of the antenna versus frequency is given in Figure 6 to show the band-notched function of this antenna. The input resistance should be around 50 Ohm and the input reactance should be around 0 Ohm when the antenna is operating at the passband. At the stopband, their values largely deviate from the nominal values.Surface current distribution of the antenna: (a) 3.2 GHz, (b) 3.7 GHz, and (c) 5 GHz.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 6
ImpedanceZ of the antenna versus frequency.


## 2.1.1.  UWB Antenna

As shown in Figure1. The referance antenna [4] uses FR4 substrate with the dimensions of  35.5 × 30 × 1.6 mm3, relative permittivity εr=4.4. The antenna is fed by a CPW line which is designed for 50 Ohm characteristic impedance. Figure 1(a) shows the top view of the antenna; the planar circular disc monopole is fabricated on the substrate. The radius of the radiating patch is R (R = 10 mm), and the width of the feed line is Wg (Wg = 3 mm). Figure 1(b) shows the rear of the antenna; the length of the ground plane is L1 (L1 = 15 mm). The top corners with the parameter G (G=5mm) are removed to improve the bandwidth of the antenna [4]. Two rectangular slots are removed to adjust the antenna impedance and reduce the return loss [4]. Hs (Hs = 3 mm) and Ws (Ws = 5 mm) denote the length and width of the rectangular slots, respectively. The ground plane is reshaped as letter “T”, for Wt = 12 mm, Ht = 4 mm. The simulated VSWR result of the UWB antenna is shown in Figure 2; it can be seen that the antenna could operate from 3.5 GHz to above 12 GHz with VSWR less than 2.Geometry of the UWB antenna: (a) top view, (b) bottom view.
(a)
(b)Figure 2
Simulated VSWR of the UWB antenna.


## 2.1.2. Single Band-Notched UWB Antenna

Before developing the dual band-notched UWB antennas, we need to investigate the method generating the single notched band. In order to achieve band-notched function, we employ an arc H-shaped slot on the circular radiating patch. The arc H-shaped slot is removed from the centre of the radiating patch. As shown in Figure3, the shape of the slot is designed as an arc letter “H.” RH denotes the radius of the outer circular arc. LH0 denotes the distance between outer arc and inner arc. The simulation is carried out using HFSS. The optimized slot dimensions are as follows: RH = 8 mm, LH0 = 3.2 mm, LH1 = 2 mm, and α=π/4. It can be seen in Figure 4 that the simulated VSWR of the antenna is larger than 2 from 3.2 GHz to 4.2 GHz acting as a stopband, meaning that this antenna can avoid the interference from IEEE 802.16 WiMAX application.Figure 3
Geometry of the arc H-shaped slot.Figure 4
Simulated VSWR of the single band-notched antenna.The simulated results of surface current distribution for the antenna at the passband (3.2 GHz, 5 GHz) and at the rejectband (3.7 GHz) are given in Figure5. It can be seen that the surface current distribution is very strong at the feed line and the surface current is highly concentrated at the arc H-shaped slot in Figure 5(b), but the situations are different in Figures 5(a) and 5(c). These clearly show the positive effects of the slot upon obtaining the band-notched characteristics. It is noted that the UWB antenna cannot work at the stopband (3.7 GHz) because of the effect of the arc H-shaped slot resonator. The impedance Z of the antenna versus frequency is given in Figure 6 to show the band-notched function of this antenna. The input resistance should be around 50 Ohm and the input reactance should be around 0 Ohm when the antenna is operating at the passband. At the stopband, their values largely deviate from the nominal values.Surface current distribution of the antenna: (a) 3.2 GHz, (b) 3.7 GHz, and (c) 5 GHz.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 6
ImpedanceZ of the antenna versus frequency.


## 2.2. Dual Band-Notched UWB Antenna Design

The high frequency band-notched function is designed to avoid the other band such as WLAN operating from 5.1 to 5.9 GHz. To achieve this function, we etch a couple of narrow slots on the ground plane. Figure7 shows the geometry of the antenna; the top view of this antenna and the slots on the ground plane are given in Figures 7(a) and 7(b), respectively. The simulated results show that the optimized slot dimensions are as follows: Wd = 0.5 mm, Ld = 7.5 mm, and S = 0.2 mm. The VSWR result is shown in Figure 8; it can be seen that the antenna could not operate from 5.1 GHz to 6 GHz as a stopband. The centre frequency of the stopband, given the dimensions of the band-notched feature, can be postulated as [16]
(1)fnotch=c4L′(εr+1)/2.Geometry of the high frequency band-notched antenna: (a) top view, (b) narrow slot on the ground plane.
(a)
(b)Figure 8
Simulated VSWR of the high frequency band-notched UWB antenna.LetL′ = Ld + Wd; εr is the effective dielectric constant, and c is the speed of light. The lengths of the slot have great effects on the band rejection performance and should be tuned carefully. By varying the length of parameter Ld, we could control the length of L′ to tune the centre frequency of the stopband.Based on the single band-notched UWB antenna, the dual band-notched function is investigated, and the geometry of the antenna is given in Figure9. Figure 10 shows the simulated VSWR result of the dual band-notched UWB antennap; it can be observed that the proposed antenna bandwidth with good stopband rejection, the band-notched characteristic of low frequency formed by the arc H-shaped slot on the radiating patch, and the band-notched characteristic of high frequency formed by the narrow slots on the ground plane hardly interfere with each other. Figure 11 shows that the centre frequency of the stopband shifts down as Ld increases. The impedance Z of the dual band-notched UWB antenna is displayed in Figure 12, which shows that the input resistance and the input reactance keep the nominal value when the antenna working on the passband. It shows that the proposed antenna is suitable for UWB applications.Figure 9
Geometry of the proposed antenna.Figure 10
Simulated VSWR result of the proposed antenna.Figure 11
Effect of length of the narrow slot.Figure 12
ImpedanceZ of the proposed antenna versus frequency.According to the impedanceZ of the dual band-notched UWB antenna shown in Figure 12, the approximate equivalent circuit of the proposed antenna is presented in Figure 13. The arc H-shaped slot on the radiating patch and narrow slots on the ground plane can be modeled by two circuit-resonance stubs at different positions in a transmission line model. At the passband, neither of the stubs has any effect in generating notched bands. On the 3.7 GHz band-notched characteristic, stub 1 makes the circuit resonate. Therefore, stub 1 behaves as a parallel resonator with an unusual input impedance Z (i.e., the input resistance is much larger than 50 Ohm, and the input reactance is not equal to 0 Ohm), causing a total impedance mismatch between the feed line and the radiating patch. As a result, VSWR of the antenna in this frequency band becomes greater, and the first notched band is created. On the 5.7 GHz band-notched characteristic, stub 2 works similarly as stub 1. The input impedance Z becomes unusual; stub 2 operates as a parallel resonator in the circuit. Essentially, the dual band-notched function is achieved by these resonators.Figure 13
Approximate equivalent circuit of the proposed antenna.


## 3. Advantages of the Arc H-Shaped Slot

Traditional H-shaped slot is designed as follows. The geometry and parameters of the H-shaped slot are shown in Figure14. Through the parametric study [17], the effects of H-shaped slot parametric variation on stopband centre frequency are presented in Table 1 [17]. It can be seen that stopband centre frequency can be tuned effectively only by varying parameter WS1.Table 1
The effects of H-shaped slot parametric variation on stopband centre frequency [17].
Parameters
Stopband centre frequency
L
S
1
Light dependence
L
S
2
Light dependence
W
S
1
Heavy dependence
W
S
2
No dependenceFigure 14
geometry and parameters of the H-shaped slot.In the proposed antenna, the first rejectband centre frequency is mainly determined by the dimensions of the parameters of the arc H-shaped slot. In order to show the advantages of the arc H-shaped slot, the parametric effects (RH, LH0, LH1, and α) of the slot are analyzed to show the advantages of the novel design.On the 3.7 GHz band-notched characteristic, the effect of parameterRH is simulated and shown in Figure 15. The dimensions of the arc H-shaped slot are LH0 = 3.2 mm, LH1 = 2 mm, and α=π/4; we can be informed that centre frequency of the band changes from 3.2 GHz to 4.4 GHz when parameter RH varies from 7 mm to 9 mm. It can be seen that the centre frequency of the stopband shifts down as RH increases. The notch frequency is heavily dependent on this parameter.Figure 15
Effect of parameterRH.The slot dimensionLH0, varies, for RH = 8 mm, LH1 = 2 mm, and α=π/4. The simulated VSWR of Figure 16 shows that frequency band notch varied from 3.7 GHz to 4 GHz as LH0 increases. Relatively, the notch frequency shows light dependence on LH0.Figure 16
Effect of parameterLH0.Figure17 shows the simulated VSWR of the effect of parameter LH1. It can be seen that the centre frequency varies from 3.6 GHz to 4.6 GHz as LH1 varies from 2 mm to 4 mm. The simulated VSWR in Figures 16 and 17 illustrate that the slot dimension LH0 has a smaller effect on notch frequency than the parameter LH1. It can be informed that the centre frequency is heavily dependent on parameter LH1 (RH = 8 mm, LH0 = 3.2 mm, and α=π/4).Figure 17
Effect of parameterLH1.In addition, another important parameterα is analyzed below. The effect of angle α is simulated and shown in Figure 18. The slot dimension α, varies, for RH = 8 mm, LH0 = 3.2 mm, and LH1 = 2 mm. It can be seen that the centre frequency of the stopband changes from 3.2 GHz to 4.5 GHz as angle α varies from π/6 to π/3. The simulated results show that a large shift in notch frequency took place with no other significant changes, so angle α is also one of the most important factors of tuning the centre frequency.Figure 18
Effect of parameter angleα.In conclusion, the effects of arc H-slot parametric variation on stopband centre frequency are presented in Table2. It can be seen that the band-notched frequency is heavily dependent on parameters RH, LH1, and angle α and is lightly dependent on parameter LH0. It can be easy to observe that the notch frequency can be tuned efficiently by changing any parameter except LH0. Relative to the conventional H-shaped slot which can only change the length of the parameter WS1 [17], the desirable notch frequency can be achieved by varying one or more parameters of the arc H-shaped slot. Due to the characteristics of the arc H-shaped slot, the antenna provides easier tuning of the band-notched function. Through the analysis of the parameters of the arc H-shaped slot, advantages of the proposed antenna are presented.Table 2
The effects of Arc H-shaped slot parametric variation on stopband centre frequency.
Parameters
Centre frequency changes per 2 mm
Stopband centre frequency
R
H
1.2 GHz
Heavy dependence
L
H0
0.3 GHz
Light dependence
L
H1
1 GHz
Heavy dependence
α
1.3 GHz (α varied from π/6 to π/3)
Heavy dependence


## 4. Results and Discussion

The photograph of fabricated dual band-notched UWB antenna is shown in Figure19. A rectangular finite FR4 board is used for manufacture. The circular radiating patch is supported by an SMA connector. Figure 20 shows the simulated and measured VSWR results of the dual band-notched UWB antenna, it can be seen that the measured VSWR agrees well with the simulated result. The fabricated antenna covers the frequency range for UWB systems from 2.9 GHz to above 10 GHz with rejection bands around 3.3–4.2 GHz and 5.2–5.9 GHz. The discrepancy between the simulated and measured results could be mainly due to errors in processing and effect of the SMA connector. In order to confirm the accurate VSWR for the designed antenna, it is recommended that the manufacturing and measuring process should be performed carefully.Figure 19
Photograph of the proposed antenna.Figure 20
Simulated and measured VSWR results of the proposed antenna.The antenna is usually required to have an omnidirectional radiation concerning the UWB applications. The simulated and measured radiation patterns at 3.2 GHz, 5 GHz, and 8 GHz are illustrated in Figures21(a), 21(b), and 21(c); we can see that the measurements and the simulations show good agreement. The main purpose of these radiation patterns is to demonstrate that the antenna actually radiates over a wide frequency band. At the passband frequencies out of the notched bands, the antenna needs to have good omnidirectional radiation patterns. As shown in the figure, the radiation patterns in the yz-plane look like an “8” shape and in the xz-plane they are nearly round-shaped. It is noted that the proposed antenna gives nearly omnidirectional radiation patterns in the H-plane (xz-plane) and E-plane (yz-plane) at the passband.Measured and simulated radiation patterns of the proposed antenna: (a) 3.2 GHz, (b) 5 GHz, and (c) 8 GHz.
(a)
(b)
(c)In addition, the total efficiency versus frequency of the proposed antenna is given in Figure22. The proposed antenna should exhibit two sharp efficiency decreases at 3.7 GHz and 5.6 GHz. According to the figure, the range of the measurements is from 3 GHz to 10 GHz; the efficiency decreases sharply at the notched frequency band because of the resonators of the proposed antenna. At the passband, the efficiency remains at high level. It is clear from the results that the antenna cannot operate at the rejectband and can work efficiently at the passband.Figure 22
Total efficiency versus frequency.


## 5. Conclusions

A novel UWB antenna with dual band-notched function has been proposed and analyzed in this paper. The primitive UWB antenna is fabricated on a FR4 substrate. An arc H-shaped slot etched on the radiating patch and narrow slots etched on the ground plane are used to achieve the dual band-notched function. The parameters of the arc H-shaped slot are analyzed to show the advantages of the proposed antenna which provides improved control of tuning the centre frequency of the rejectband. The bandwidth of the low frequency band-notched antenna formed by the arc H-shaped slot and the bandwidth of the high frequency band-notched antenna formed by the narrow slots do not interfere with each other. The results of surface current distributions and the input impedance show that the designed antenna bandwidth with good band rejection is presented. Nearly omnidirectional radiation patterns and desirable efficiency of the antenna which could be observed by the simulated and measured results are also presented to verify the satisfactory performance of the proposed antenna.



---

*Source: 531959-2014-02-03.xml*