# Interaction between Vetiver Grass Roots and Completely Decomposed Volcanic Tuff under Rainfall Infiltration Conditions

Authors: Ling Xu; Chongyang Gao; Dongdong Yan
Journal: Geofluids
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

The important role of vetiver grass roots in preventing water erosion and mass movement has been well recognized, though the detailed influence of the grass roots on soil has not been addressed. Through planting vetiver grass at the Kadoorie Farm in Hong Kong and leaving it to grow without artificial maintenance, the paper studies the influence of vetiver grass roots on soil properties and slope stability. Under the natural conditions of Hong Kong, growth of the vetiver grass roots can reach 1.1 m depth after one and a half year from planting. The percentage of grain size which is less than 0.075 mm in rooted soil is more than that of the nonrooted soil. Vetiver grass roots can reduce soil erosion by locking the finer grain. The rooted soil of high finer grain content has a relatively small permeability. As a result, the increase in water content is therefore smaller than that of nonrooted soil in the same rainfall conditions. Shear box test reveals that the vetiver grass roots significantly increased the peak cohesion of the soil from 9.3 kPa to 18.9 kPa. The combined effects of grass roots on hydrological responses and shearing strength significantly stabilize the slope in local rainfall condition.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The use of vetiver grass for various applications in erosion and sediment control was developed by the World Bank for soil and water conservation in India in the 1980s [1]. Many literatures reviewed or studied the characteristics of vetiver grass and its application in preventing soil erosion and mass movement [2–9]. Rainfall infiltration is a key factor to control slope stability [10, 11]. In all, the effects of vetiver grass roots on erosion control and mass movement can be summarized as follows: (1) preventing surface erosion through the soil-binding properties of roots, (2) reducing effects of splash erosion through rainfall interception of vegetation canopy, (3) reducing the incidence of shallow slope instability through the anchoring properties of roots, (4) channeling run-off to alter slope hydrology, and (5) providing support to the base of the slope and trapping material moving down the slope.Hong Kong is a small place and is densely populated; urban development has been carried out over the decades, which has led to enormous pressures on the fragile mountain environment. Most of Hong Kong’s crucial rain is brought by the monsoon, which falls in just a few weeks between May and September (Figure1). In combination with the monsoon climate, very steep slopes, and inherently weak geological conditions, these factors make Hong Kong highly susceptible to erosion and landslides [12–17]. So, vetiver grass, as an important species used for soil bioengineering, is selected in this research to deal with erosion problems and shallow landslides in Hong Kong (Figure 2).Figure 1
The monthly average of rainfall and rainfall days recorded by the observatory in 1981–2010.Figure 2
The site and DEM of Hong Kong.The paper focused on the influence of vetiver grass roots on physical and mechanical properties of soil which has not been addressed, though the important role of vetiver grass roots in preventing water erosion and mass movement has been recognized in recent years. Because the majority of published literatures are based on practical experience or not under such local nature conditions of Hong Kong, there is still a clear need for scientific research concerning the influence of vetiver grass roots on physical and mechanical prosperities. In this study, the in situ water content was tested by moisture probe in field. Tests consisting of water content, soil density, grain-size distribution, permeability, and direct shearing were carried out in the laboratory. All items were conducted on rooted and nonrooted soil, respectively.


## 2. Planting Site and Vetiver Grass Growth

Vetiver grass used in this research has been planted at the Kadoorie Farm of Hong Kong in June. Vetiver grass was planted at spacing of 1 m on a steep slope surface (Figure3). The slope is 10 m long and has a maximum height of about 10 m. The slope was formed to an angle of 60° by cutting into completely decomposed volcanic tuff.Figure 3
Panorama of research site (a) before grass planting and (b) during field testing.
(a) (b)In order to test its survivability, no water and nutrients were artificially given to the grass during its growth. In 3 months after planting, the grass had grown up to 1.0 m high (Figure4(a)). Figure 4(b) shows a typical grass roots system. The maximum root depth is 1.1 m and the root diameter ranges from 0.05 mm to 4 mm. Main roots were mostly found within the 25 cm below the ground surface, and for the depth greater than 25 cm from the surface, fibrous roots were mostly found.Figure 4
(a) Vetiver stem growth in 3 months after planting. (b) Typical grass root system.
(a) (b)Figure5 shows the development of the grass stem length against time. At the time of field sampling and testing in January, the grass had grown to about 1.8 m tall in a very healthy condition despite the fact that it had been exposed to heavy rain in the summer and a very dry winter.Figure 5
The development of the grass stems length against time.


## 3. Field and Laboratory Test Results

### 3.1. Physical Properties

Herein, physical properties include water content, soil density, grain-size distribution, and permeability. All these items were conducted on both rooted soil and nonrooted soil to explore the influences of vetiver grass roots on soil’s physical properties.Water Content. Firstly, soil water content was studied in field on nonrooted and rooted soil. The ML2X moisture probe and data logger produced by detaT company in UK were used in this test. The selected testing locations and the measured output voltage value are shown in Figure 6. According to the calibration curves of measured voltage and water content, the mass water content was obtained as shown in Table 1. Soil water content was also tested in laboratory. The soil tested was taken from the sample surface when the sample box was opened in laboratory. The water content was measured by drying method. The results are shown in Table 2.Table 1
In situ measured voltage of moisture probe and corresponding water content.
Sample types Voltage tested (mv) Water content (%) Voltage tested (mv) Water content (%) Rooted soil tested in field 454.00 15.10 580.00 17.73 453.00 15.08 282.00 11.50 453.00 15.08 236.00 10.54 453.00 15.08 647.00 19.13 458.00 15.18 394.00 13.84 563.00 17.37 436.00 14.72 453.00 15.08 402.00 14.01 438.00 14.76 472.00 15.47 572.00 17.56 433.00 14.66 452.00 15.05 339.00 12.69 491.00 15.87 345.00 12.82 481.00 15.66 336.00 12.63 597.00 18.08 316.00 12.21  Nonrooted soil tested in field 294.00 11.75 375.00 13.45 472.00 15.47 385.00 13.65 397.00 13.90 321.00 12.32 341.00 12.73Table 2
Laboratory water content on block samples.
Sample number Laboratory water content taken from sample surface (%) Rootedsample_01 21 Rootedsample_02 17 Rootedsample_03 18 Rootedsample_04 21 Rootedsample_05 21 Nonrooted sample_01 17 Nonrooted sample_02 23 Nonrooted sample_03 17Figure 6
In situ water content locations and corresponding voltage value.
(a)
Measured locations in the area in which vetiver was planted (b)
Measured locations in the area in which vetiver was not plantedFrom the results of the in situ and laboratory water content shown in Table3, it is observed that vetiver grass roots increased the average soil water content by about 11.63% in field. The increase scale in laboratory testing is 8.26%. It is less than that obtained in field and may be because of the difference of two types of samples in water loss.Table 3
In situ and laboratory water content of soil samples.
Soil without roots Soil with roots Increase in percentage Average in situ water content 13.33% 14.88% 11.63% Average laboratory water content taken from sample surface 18.7% 19.8% 8.26%Soil Density. The soil used for density testing was taken from the block sample surface when opening the box in laboratory. Ring-knife method was used in this test. Inner diameter of the ring-knife is 61.8 mm and height is 20 mm. Test results are shown in Table 4. It can be found that the average density of soil with roots is 1.81 g/cm3, which is higher than that of the soil without roots, 1.67 g/cm3. Using the laboratory water content in Table 3, the dry density of soil was calculated in Table 4. The dry density of rooted soil is 1.51 g/cm3, about 7% higher than 1.41 g/cm3 of the nonrooted soil.Table 4
Laboratory soil density and calculated dry density.
Sample number Laboratory soil density (%) Average natural soildensity (g/cm3) Calculated dry density (g/cm3) Rootedsample_1 1.81 1.81 1.51 Rootedsample_2 1.85 Rootedsample_3 1.86 Rootedsample_4 1.79 Rootedsample_5 1.74  Nonrooted sample_1 1.70 1.67 1.41 Nonrooted sample_2 1.66 Nonrooted sample_3 1.66Grain-Size Distribution. Grain-size distribution of rooted and nonrooted soils has traditionally been tested combined by sieving and hydrometer methods in laboratory. The results of grain-size distribution are tabulated in Table 5. Figure 7 shows the average grain size distribution of the soil samples with and without roots. It is observed that the percentage of grain size of 0.075~0.005 mm and less than 0.005 mm in rooted soil is higher than that in the nonrooted soil by 18.2% and 39.1%, respectively. It indicates that vetiver grass roots can reduce soil erosion by locking the finer grain in soil.Table 5
Grain-size distribution of different samples.
Sample number Gainsize (mm) 10~5 5~2 2~0.5 0.5~0.25 0.25~0.075 0.075~0.005 <0.005 Nonrooted sample_1 2.7 32.7 12.8 1.9 20.7 19.7 9.5 Nonrooted sample_2 3.7 38.2 12.5 2 16.1 17.2 10.3 Nonrooted sample_3 7.4 25.7 5.3 0.9 10.9 25.9 23.9 Rooted sample_1 2.2 36.1 8.9 1.2 10.5 21 20.1 Rooted sample_2 2 25.6 10.6 1.5 15.8 26.1 18.4 RootedSample_3 1.1 22.2 8.1 1.1 13.3 30.7 23.5 RootedSample_4 3.6 26.3 10 1.7 13.4 25.4 19.6 RootedSample_5 2.7 37.8 7.6 1.1 10.6 20.5 19.7Figure 7
Average grain-size distribution of rooted and nonrooted properties.


### 3.2. Mechanical Properties

Shear Box Test Results. Eight samples, each of dimensions 600 mm × 600 mm × 600 mm, were retrieved at location shown in Figure 3. Five samples were matrix of soil containing vetiver grass roots, whereas the remaining three were “bare” soil.The soil was identified to be completely decomposed tuff. The densities and moisture content were tabulated in Table6. Furthermore, the particle-size distribution of each sample was determined by taking samples, and the results are depicted in Figure 7. The soil is rather fine with some gravel. The coefficient of uniformity is approximately 5.Table 6
Densities and moisture content of the soil samples.
Sample Moisture content Moist density (kg/m3) Dry density (kg/m3) Rooted soil 14.9% 1800 1500 Nonrooted soil 13.3% 1700 1400The shear strength obtained is plotted on they-axis with the corresponding normal stress on the x-axis. Based on the test results (Table 7), the soil cohesion and frictional angle were obtained (Figures 8 and 9).Table 7
Results of large-scale direct shear test.
Sample number Designed normal stress/kPa Peak state Residual state Root area ratio Displacement/mm Normal stress/kPa Shearstress/kPa Normal stress/kPa Shear stress/kPa Rooted_1 20 16 22.4 32.2 24.5 19.8 1.98% Rooted_2 40 18 51.3 39.5 42.9 25.4 0.88% Rooted_3 60 32 71.5 46.6 67.5 41 1.60% Rooted_4 80 22 82.9 54.4 84.6 41.4 2.45% Rooted_5 120 16 124.2 76.1 128.4 62.2 2.11% Nonrooted_1 10 15 10.7 14 9.6 10.4 - - - Nonrooted_2 80 29 80 45.5 79 34 - - - Nonrooted_3 120 36 120 63 120.3 54 - - -Figure 8
Peak shear strength against normal stress of rooted and nonrooted sample.Figure 9
Residual shear strength against normal stress of rooted and nonrooted sample.As shown in Figure8, the peak cohesion of rooted soil is 18.9 kPa and the nonrooted soil is 9.3 kPa. Vetiver grass roots increased the cohesion by 103% in this study. The peak friction angles of rooted and nonrooted soils are nearly the same, which are 23.7° and 24.2°, respectively. The results of residual strength are shown in Figure 9. The residual cohesions of the rooted and nonrooted soils are 8.7 kPa and 5.8 kPa and their corresponding friction angles are 23.1° and 21.2°.


### 3.3. Application to Slope Safety

Vetiver grass was used to stabilize the slope. The effect of roots on slope stability is therefore analysed here. As revealed by shearing box testing, the grass roots can increase the soil strength. On the other hand, vetiver grass also changed the soil permeability. Finer particles were well reserved in the rooted soil in case of rainfall conditions. This will certainly influence the soil water characteristic curve (SWCC). In this study, the SWCC is evaluated using the soil’s particle-size distribution. Soil permeability function is generated for rooted and nonrooted soils. As a result, the soil water contents in slope under the same rainfall conditions are different. The slope stability will therefore be different for rooted soil and nonrooted soil.A slope is selected in this study. The slope angle is 45°. This is mainly because the 45° slope is mostly distributed in Hong Kong (Figure2). The vetiver grass rooted soil is 3 m deep in vertical direction. The particle-size distribution of rooted and nonrooted soils as shown in Figure 7 is adopted to evaluate SWCC (Figure 10) for grass slope and nongrass slope, respectively. The soil strength as presented in Figure 8 is adopted for the rooted and nonrooted soils. The rainfall intensity of 7.62 × 10−7m/s was used in the model. The preset slip surface was defined in the slope to constitute the base of the comparison between nonrooted and rooted slopes.Figure 10
Hydrological responses to rainfall and slope stability for nonrooted and rooted slopes.Figure10 shows the results of rooted and nonrooted slopes under rainfall conditions. The rainfall intensity used in this study is calculated from the monthly average of rainfall and rainfall days recorded by the observatory in 1981–2010 (Figure 1). It was found that the rainfall firstly infiltrated into the nonrooted slope is quicker than the rooted slope. It causes the soil in the nonrooted slope to be higher in water content than the rooted slope. The metric suction was evolved in the slope stability analysis. With increasing the soil water content, the soil strengths decrease. The grass root can enhance the soil strength. In this model, the peak strength for nonrooted and rooted soil was adopted in the slope. The data results clearly show that the grass root can increase the slope’s stability.


## 3.1. Physical Properties

Herein, physical properties include water content, soil density, grain-size distribution, and permeability. All these items were conducted on both rooted soil and nonrooted soil to explore the influences of vetiver grass roots on soil’s physical properties.Water Content. Firstly, soil water content was studied in field on nonrooted and rooted soil. The ML2X moisture probe and data logger produced by detaT company in UK were used in this test. The selected testing locations and the measured output voltage value are shown in Figure 6. According to the calibration curves of measured voltage and water content, the mass water content was obtained as shown in Table 1. Soil water content was also tested in laboratory. The soil tested was taken from the sample surface when the sample box was opened in laboratory. The water content was measured by drying method. The results are shown in Table 2.Table 1
In situ measured voltage of moisture probe and corresponding water content.
Sample types Voltage tested (mv) Water content (%) Voltage tested (mv) Water content (%) Rooted soil tested in field 454.00 15.10 580.00 17.73 453.00 15.08 282.00 11.50 453.00 15.08 236.00 10.54 453.00 15.08 647.00 19.13 458.00 15.18 394.00 13.84 563.00 17.37 436.00 14.72 453.00 15.08 402.00 14.01 438.00 14.76 472.00 15.47 572.00 17.56 433.00 14.66 452.00 15.05 339.00 12.69 491.00 15.87 345.00 12.82 481.00 15.66 336.00 12.63 597.00 18.08 316.00 12.21  Nonrooted soil tested in field 294.00 11.75 375.00 13.45 472.00 15.47 385.00 13.65 397.00 13.90 321.00 12.32 341.00 12.73Table 2
Laboratory water content on block samples.
Sample number Laboratory water content taken from sample surface (%) Rootedsample_01 21 Rootedsample_02 17 Rootedsample_03 18 Rootedsample_04 21 Rootedsample_05 21 Nonrooted sample_01 17 Nonrooted sample_02 23 Nonrooted sample_03 17Figure 6
In situ water content locations and corresponding voltage value.
(a)
Measured locations in the area in which vetiver was planted (b)
Measured locations in the area in which vetiver was not plantedFrom the results of the in situ and laboratory water content shown in Table3, it is observed that vetiver grass roots increased the average soil water content by about 11.63% in field. The increase scale in laboratory testing is 8.26%. It is less than that obtained in field and may be because of the difference of two types of samples in water loss.Table 3
In situ and laboratory water content of soil samples.
Soil without roots Soil with roots Increase in percentage Average in situ water content 13.33% 14.88% 11.63% Average laboratory water content taken from sample surface 18.7% 19.8% 8.26%Soil Density. The soil used for density testing was taken from the block sample surface when opening the box in laboratory. Ring-knife method was used in this test. Inner diameter of the ring-knife is 61.8 mm and height is 20 mm. Test results are shown in Table 4. It can be found that the average density of soil with roots is 1.81 g/cm3, which is higher than that of the soil without roots, 1.67 g/cm3. Using the laboratory water content in Table 3, the dry density of soil was calculated in Table 4. The dry density of rooted soil is 1.51 g/cm3, about 7% higher than 1.41 g/cm3 of the nonrooted soil.Table 4
Laboratory soil density and calculated dry density.
Sample number Laboratory soil density (%) Average natural soildensity (g/cm3) Calculated dry density (g/cm3) Rootedsample_1 1.81 1.81 1.51 Rootedsample_2 1.85 Rootedsample_3 1.86 Rootedsample_4 1.79 Rootedsample_5 1.74  Nonrooted sample_1 1.70 1.67 1.41 Nonrooted sample_2 1.66 Nonrooted sample_3 1.66Grain-Size Distribution. Grain-size distribution of rooted and nonrooted soils has traditionally been tested combined by sieving and hydrometer methods in laboratory. The results of grain-size distribution are tabulated in Table 5. Figure 7 shows the average grain size distribution of the soil samples with and without roots. It is observed that the percentage of grain size of 0.075~0.005 mm and less than 0.005 mm in rooted soil is higher than that in the nonrooted soil by 18.2% and 39.1%, respectively. It indicates that vetiver grass roots can reduce soil erosion by locking the finer grain in soil.Table 5
Grain-size distribution of different samples.
Sample number Gainsize (mm) 10~5 5~2 2~0.5 0.5~0.25 0.25~0.075 0.075~0.005 <0.005 Nonrooted sample_1 2.7 32.7 12.8 1.9 20.7 19.7 9.5 Nonrooted sample_2 3.7 38.2 12.5 2 16.1 17.2 10.3 Nonrooted sample_3 7.4 25.7 5.3 0.9 10.9 25.9 23.9 Rooted sample_1 2.2 36.1 8.9 1.2 10.5 21 20.1 Rooted sample_2 2 25.6 10.6 1.5 15.8 26.1 18.4 RootedSample_3 1.1 22.2 8.1 1.1 13.3 30.7 23.5 RootedSample_4 3.6 26.3 10 1.7 13.4 25.4 19.6 RootedSample_5 2.7 37.8 7.6 1.1 10.6 20.5 19.7Figure 7
Average grain-size distribution of rooted and nonrooted properties.


## 3.2. Mechanical Properties

Shear Box Test Results. Eight samples, each of dimensions 600 mm × 600 mm × 600 mm, were retrieved at location shown in Figure 3. Five samples were matrix of soil containing vetiver grass roots, whereas the remaining three were “bare” soil.The soil was identified to be completely decomposed tuff. The densities and moisture content were tabulated in Table6. Furthermore, the particle-size distribution of each sample was determined by taking samples, and the results are depicted in Figure 7. The soil is rather fine with some gravel. The coefficient of uniformity is approximately 5.Table 6
Densities and moisture content of the soil samples.
Sample Moisture content Moist density (kg/m3) Dry density (kg/m3) Rooted soil 14.9% 1800 1500 Nonrooted soil 13.3% 1700 1400The shear strength obtained is plotted on they-axis with the corresponding normal stress on the x-axis. Based on the test results (Table 7), the soil cohesion and frictional angle were obtained (Figures 8 and 9).Table 7
Results of large-scale direct shear test.
Sample number Designed normal stress/kPa Peak state Residual state Root area ratio Displacement/mm Normal stress/kPa Shearstress/kPa Normal stress/kPa Shear stress/kPa Rooted_1 20 16 22.4 32.2 24.5 19.8 1.98% Rooted_2 40 18 51.3 39.5 42.9 25.4 0.88% Rooted_3 60 32 71.5 46.6 67.5 41 1.60% Rooted_4 80 22 82.9 54.4 84.6 41.4 2.45% Rooted_5 120 16 124.2 76.1 128.4 62.2 2.11% Nonrooted_1 10 15 10.7 14 9.6 10.4 - - - Nonrooted_2 80 29 80 45.5 79 34 - - - Nonrooted_3 120 36 120 63 120.3 54 - - -Figure 8
Peak shear strength against normal stress of rooted and nonrooted sample.Figure 9
Residual shear strength against normal stress of rooted and nonrooted sample.As shown in Figure8, the peak cohesion of rooted soil is 18.9 kPa and the nonrooted soil is 9.3 kPa. Vetiver grass roots increased the cohesion by 103% in this study. The peak friction angles of rooted and nonrooted soils are nearly the same, which are 23.7° and 24.2°, respectively. The results of residual strength are shown in Figure 9. The residual cohesions of the rooted and nonrooted soils are 8.7 kPa and 5.8 kPa and their corresponding friction angles are 23.1° and 21.2°.


## 3.3. Application to Slope Safety

Vetiver grass was used to stabilize the slope. The effect of roots on slope stability is therefore analysed here. As revealed by shearing box testing, the grass roots can increase the soil strength. On the other hand, vetiver grass also changed the soil permeability. Finer particles were well reserved in the rooted soil in case of rainfall conditions. This will certainly influence the soil water characteristic curve (SWCC). In this study, the SWCC is evaluated using the soil’s particle-size distribution. Soil permeability function is generated for rooted and nonrooted soils. As a result, the soil water contents in slope under the same rainfall conditions are different. The slope stability will therefore be different for rooted soil and nonrooted soil.A slope is selected in this study. The slope angle is 45°. This is mainly because the 45° slope is mostly distributed in Hong Kong (Figure2). The vetiver grass rooted soil is 3 m deep in vertical direction. The particle-size distribution of rooted and nonrooted soils as shown in Figure 7 is adopted to evaluate SWCC (Figure 10) for grass slope and nongrass slope, respectively. The soil strength as presented in Figure 8 is adopted for the rooted and nonrooted soils. The rainfall intensity of 7.62 × 10−7m/s was used in the model. The preset slip surface was defined in the slope to constitute the base of the comparison between nonrooted and rooted slopes.Figure 10
Hydrological responses to rainfall and slope stability for nonrooted and rooted slopes.Figure10 shows the results of rooted and nonrooted slopes under rainfall conditions. The rainfall intensity used in this study is calculated from the monthly average of rainfall and rainfall days recorded by the observatory in 1981–2010 (Figure 1). It was found that the rainfall firstly infiltrated into the nonrooted slope is quicker than the rooted slope. It causes the soil in the nonrooted slope to be higher in water content than the rooted slope. The metric suction was evolved in the slope stability analysis. With increasing the soil water content, the soil strengths decrease. The grass root can enhance the soil strength. In this model, the peak strength for nonrooted and rooted soil was adopted in the slope. The data results clearly show that the grass root can increase the slope’s stability.


## 4. Conclusions

This study highlights the influence of vetiver grass on soil properties and associated slope stability. It was firstly found that, under the natural conditions of Hong Kong, growth of the vetiver grass roots can reach 1.1 m depth after one and a half year from planting. Vetiver grass roots can increase the soil water content and density. The vetiver grass roots can reduce soil erosion by locking the finer grain. Grain-size distribution analysis shows that the percentage of grain size of 0.075~0.005 mm and that less than 0.005 mm in rooted soil is higher than those of nonrooted soil by 18.2% and 39.1%, respectively.Shear box test results do show that the vetiver grass roots significantly increased the peak cohesion of completely decomposed volcanic tuff by 103% from 9.3 kPa to 18.9 kPa. To evaluate the effect of grass roots on slope stability, a numerical modeling was performed. It illustrates that the grass roots can prevent the rainfall water infiltration by locking the finer grain, which is of benefit for slope stabilizing. It was therefore demonstrated that the combined effects of grass roots on hydrological responses and shearing strength can stabilize the slope.



---

*Source: 5219592-2018-05-14.xml*