# Detection of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-ProducingEscherichia coli in Market-Ready Chickens in Zambia

Authors: K. Chishimba; B. M. Hang’ombe; K. Muzandu; S. E. Mshana; M. I. Matee; C. Nakajima; Y. Suzuki
Journal: International Journal of Microbiology
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

The frequent administering of antibiotics in the treatment of poultry diseases may contribute to emergence of antimicrobial-resistant strains. The objective of this study was to detect the presence of extended-spectrumβ-lactamase- (ESBL-) producingEscherichia coli in poultry in Zambia. A total of 384 poultry samples were collected and analyzed for ESBL-producingEscherichia coli. The culturedE. coli isolates were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility tests and the polymerase chain reaction for detection of blaCTX-M, blaSHV, and blaTEM genes. Overall 20.1%, 77/384, (95% CI; 43.2–65.5%) of total samples analyzed contained ESBL-producingEscherichia coli. The antimicrobial sensitivity test revealed that 85.7% (66/77; CI: 75.7–92) of ESBL-producingE. coli isolates conferred resistance to beta-lactam and other antimicrobial agents. These results indicate that poultry is a potential reservoir for ESBL-producingEscherichia coli. The presence of ESBL-producingEscherichia coli in poultry destined for human consumption requires strengthening of the antibiotic administering policy. This is important as antibiotic administration in food animals is gaining momentum for improved animal productivity in developing countries such as Zambia.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producers are Gram-negative bacteria that produce enzymes that bestow resistance to most beta-lactam antibiotics like penicillins, cephalosporins, and the monobactam aztreonam [1]. These ESBL producers have been noticed mainly in the Enterobacteriaceae family of bacteria which may harbour several antibiotic resistance determinants making treatment of infections caused by these pathogens more difficult [2].Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producers have a complex epidemiology; the most prominent bacteria involved includeE. coli andK. pneumoniae whose reservoirs comprise the environment (soil and water), wild animals, farm animals, food, and pets [3]. In some communities, backyard poultry houses at residential premises may disseminate antimicrobial-resistant ESBL producers in the environment as previously observed [4]. A study conducted in Spain identified the presence of ESBL-producing bacteria in poultry withE. coli strains comprising ESBL CTX-M-14, CTX-M-9, and SHV-12 [5]. In another study conducted in Britain, 54.5% of CTX-M-carryingE. coli was isolated from broiler abattoirs and 3.6% from individual broiler caecal samples [6]. Food animals colonized with ESBL-producing bacteria can enhance the spread of bacteria at the community level [7]. Antimicrobial-resistantE. coli asymptomatically colonizes the intestinal flora of food animals with a likelihood of becoming infectious to humans if consumed through the food chain [8]. Furthermore the predominant presence of Cefotaxime-Munich genes in healthy broiler chickens can in the long run spread the resistant ESBL-genes from the rearing environment into the food chain [3]. Contamination of meat products during slaughtering, dressing, and evisceration of internal contents is another risk factor that can result in further spread of resistant ESBLs genes within the human population [3, 6].Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing bacteria are frequently resistant to many antimicrobial agents usually recommended for the treatment of infections such as gentamicin, fluoroquinolones, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole [9]. This leads to serious challenges in the treatment of ESBL-Enterobacteriaceae infections because the bacterial plasmid may harbour several antibiotic resistance determinants [2]. Heavy usage of antibiotics has been reported to be a risk factor in the acquisition of ESBL-producing organisms. An increased trend of resistance to commonly used antibiotics, namely, ampicillin, cotrimoxazole, gentamicin, erythromycin, tetracycline, and third-generation cephalosporins, has been observed [10, 11].In the present study we found the presence of ESBL-producingE. coli bacteria in market-ready chickens. These organisms have been established to confer resistance to many antimicrobial agents recommended for the treatment of infections such as gentamicin, fluoroquinolones, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole [2]. This leads to serious challenges in the treatment of ESBL-Enterobacteriaceae infections [10, 11]. A baseline study was therefore initiated to determine the carriage of ESBL in food of animal origin in market-ready broiler chickens in Zambia.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Study Area and Sampling

The study was conducted in Lusaka, the capital city of Zambia. Lusaka covers an estimated area of 360 km2 and is located at 15°30′ latitude south and 28°17′ longitude east. The city lies on a plateau 1280 m above sea level [12]. A poultry abattoir was considered for the purpose of poultry swab sampling at a point where broiler chickens were to enter the market. A total of 384 poultry samples were collected at the slaughterhouse, before the carcasses were chilled.The swabs were labelled appropriately and collection of the swab samples was aseptically done. This involved the use of sterile swab sticks (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) which were placed in tubes containing a Cary-Blair transport medium (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK). The poultry samples were inoculated on MacConkey agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) containing 2 mg/L of cefotaxime (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) for preliminary screening of ESBL-producing bacteria [13]. The plates were later incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. The colonies that grew on MacConkey agar were identified as lactose fermenters or nonlactose fermenters. Identification ofE. coli lactose-fermenting positive colonies was done using phenotypic characteristics and confirmed by the Triple Sugar Iron (TSI) and IMViC tests as described by Rayamajhi et al. [13] and Batchelor et al. [14]. For genetic detection,E. coli isolates were cultured on brain-heart-infusion broth (Nissui, Tokyo, Japan) at 37°C for 24 hours. After incubation, DNA was extracted by boiling methods [15]. TheE. coli isolates were subjected to PCR for confirmation of resistance genes: TEM (Temoniera), SHV (Sulphydryl Variable), and CTX-M (Cefotaxime-Munich) using primers previously used by other workers [14, 16]. The PCR (Finnzymes Oy, Finland) was performed in a total reaction volume of 10 µL consisting of 5 µL Phusion master mix, 2 µL sterile distilled water, 2 µL primers (forward and reverse), and 1 µL bacterial DNA template. The PCR was performed using the rapid cycle DNA amplification method comprising an initial denaturation step at 98°C for 30 seconds, followed by 35 cycles of template denaturation at 98°C for 1 second and primer annealing at 60°C for 5 seconds and 72°C for 1 second with final extension at 72°C for 10 seconds. The PCR products were later viewed with ethidium bromide after electrophoresis through 1.5% agarose gel [17].


### 2.2. Antibiotic Sensitivity Testing

The antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method on Mueller Hinton Agar (Becton, Dickinson and Company, MD, USA) based on the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines [18]. The antibiotic discs (Becton, Dickinson and Company, MD, USA) used included ampicillin (10 μg), sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (1.25/23.75 μg), streptomycin (300 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), norfloxacin (10 μg), and cefotaxime (30 μg). The phenotypic confirmation of ESBL isolates was done by the combination of disc approximation method using either ceftazidime (30 μg) or cefotaxime (30 μg) alone followed by overnight incubation at 37°C for 18–24 hrs. Interpretation of susceptibility patterns on other antimicrobial discs was done using guidelines laid down in the CLSI, which provides break points corresponding to zone of inhibition diameter. An increase in antibiotic zone diameter (5–12 mm) for either ceftazidime or cefotaxime indicated ESBL production [10, 18]. Quality control standard laboratory procedures were strictly adhered to, to avoid contamination.Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as a quality control organism.


## 2.1. Study Area and Sampling

The study was conducted in Lusaka, the capital city of Zambia. Lusaka covers an estimated area of 360 km2 and is located at 15°30′ latitude south and 28°17′ longitude east. The city lies on a plateau 1280 m above sea level [12]. A poultry abattoir was considered for the purpose of poultry swab sampling at a point where broiler chickens were to enter the market. A total of 384 poultry samples were collected at the slaughterhouse, before the carcasses were chilled.The swabs were labelled appropriately and collection of the swab samples was aseptically done. This involved the use of sterile swab sticks (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) which were placed in tubes containing a Cary-Blair transport medium (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK). The poultry samples were inoculated on MacConkey agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) containing 2 mg/L of cefotaxime (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) for preliminary screening of ESBL-producing bacteria [13]. The plates were later incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. The colonies that grew on MacConkey agar were identified as lactose fermenters or nonlactose fermenters. Identification ofE. coli lactose-fermenting positive colonies was done using phenotypic characteristics and confirmed by the Triple Sugar Iron (TSI) and IMViC tests as described by Rayamajhi et al. [13] and Batchelor et al. [14]. For genetic detection,E. coli isolates were cultured on brain-heart-infusion broth (Nissui, Tokyo, Japan) at 37°C for 24 hours. After incubation, DNA was extracted by boiling methods [15]. TheE. coli isolates were subjected to PCR for confirmation of resistance genes: TEM (Temoniera), SHV (Sulphydryl Variable), and CTX-M (Cefotaxime-Munich) using primers previously used by other workers [14, 16]. The PCR (Finnzymes Oy, Finland) was performed in a total reaction volume of 10 µL consisting of 5 µL Phusion master mix, 2 µL sterile distilled water, 2 µL primers (forward and reverse), and 1 µL bacterial DNA template. The PCR was performed using the rapid cycle DNA amplification method comprising an initial denaturation step at 98°C for 30 seconds, followed by 35 cycles of template denaturation at 98°C for 1 second and primer annealing at 60°C for 5 seconds and 72°C for 1 second with final extension at 72°C for 10 seconds. The PCR products were later viewed with ethidium bromide after electrophoresis through 1.5% agarose gel [17].


## 2.2. Antibiotic Sensitivity Testing

The antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method on Mueller Hinton Agar (Becton, Dickinson and Company, MD, USA) based on the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines [18]. The antibiotic discs (Becton, Dickinson and Company, MD, USA) used included ampicillin (10 μg), sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (1.25/23.75 μg), streptomycin (300 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), norfloxacin (10 μg), and cefotaxime (30 μg). The phenotypic confirmation of ESBL isolates was done by the combination of disc approximation method using either ceftazidime (30 μg) or cefotaxime (30 μg) alone followed by overnight incubation at 37°C for 18–24 hrs. Interpretation of susceptibility patterns on other antimicrobial discs was done using guidelines laid down in the CLSI, which provides break points corresponding to zone of inhibition diameter. An increase in antibiotic zone diameter (5–12 mm) for either ceftazidime or cefotaxime indicated ESBL production [10, 18]. Quality control standard laboratory procedures were strictly adhered to, to avoid contamination.Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as a quality control organism.


## 3. Results

Of the 384E. coli isolates analyzed for the presence of ESBL-producing isolates on PCR, a total of 20.1%, 77/384, (95% CI; 43.2–65.5%) were confirmed to be ESBL-producing isolates. The ESBL-producingE. coli isolates carried the β-lactamase genes of either blaCTX-M, blaSHV, and blaTEM or a combination. The major gene detected on PCR was blaCTX-M cluster, followed by blaSHV cluster, and blaTEM cluster. A combination of blaCTX-M + blaTEM cluster showed 4.4% (17 isolates). This was followed by a combination of blaCTX-M + blaSHV cluster and blaCTX-M + blaSHV + blaTEM cluster with 0.52% (2 isolates) and the lowest was a combination of blaTEM + blaSHV cluster with 0.3% (1 isolate) (Table 1).Table 1
Confirmed ESBL-producingE. coli (using PCR and gene detection) isolates.
Detected gene (s)
Number ofE. coli isolates
% ofE. coli isolates (n=384)a
SHV
2
0.52
CTX-M
50
13
TEM
3
0.8
CTX-M and TEM
17
4.4
CTX-M and SHV
2
0.52
TEM and SHV
1
0.3
CTX-M, SHV, and TEM
2
0.52
Noneb
307
79.9
Proven ESBL producers
77
20.1
a384 E. coli isolates suspected of being ESBL producers were examined.
bNegative in all PCRs.The seventy-seven (77)E. coli isolates preliminarily identified as ESBL-producingE. coli were subjected to antibiotic susceptibility testing. Of 77E. coli isolates analyzed, 85.7% (66/77; CI: 75.7–92) were resistant to one or several antimicrobial compounds. The diversity of the antibiotic resistant and susceptibleE. coli isolates was clearly observed with 66 isolates being resistant to one or more antibiotics used and 11 isolates being susceptible to all antibiotics tested. Interestingly, high resistance rates were noticed in ampicillin (100%), cefotaxime/ceftazidime (100%), tetracycline (59.7%), chloramphenicol (57.1%), and norfloxacin (54.5%) (Table 2). It was further observed that multidrug resistance (MDR) ofE. coli isolates to six or more drugs was most frequent (45.5%, 35/77) followed by resistance to five drugs (11.7%, 9/77) and four drugs (11.7%, 9/77). Based on the antimicrobial susceptibility test results,E. coli from poultry in this study can be grouped in six phenotypes (Table 3).Table 2
Antibiotic susceptibilities of the isolatesn=77.
Antibiotic
Resistant number (%)
Cefotaxime/ceftazidime
77 (100%)
Ampicillin
77 (100%)
Chloramphenicol
44 (57.1%)
Ciprofloxacin
37 (48.1%)
Gentamicin
29 (37.7%)
Nalidixic acid
37 (48.1%)
Norfloxacin
42 (54.5%)
Streptomycin
15 (20.8%)
Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim
32 (41.6%)
Tetracycline
46 (59.7%)Table 3
Antibiotic resistance patterns ofE. coli isolates.
Antibiotic combination
Number of resistant isolates
%
Observation
Ampicillin and tetracycline
1
1.3
Resistant to two antibiotics
Ampicillin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, and ceftazidime
3
3.9
Resistant to four antibiotics
Ampicillin, ceftazidime, chloramphenicol, and norfloxacin
3
3.9
Resistant to four antibiotics
Ampicillin, chloramphenicol, cefotaxime, and sulfamethoxazole
3
3.9
Resistant to four antibiotics
Ampicillin, streptomycin, gentamicin, tetracycline, and cefotaxime
9
11.7
Resistant to five antibiotics
Ampicillin, streptomycin, tetracycline, cefotaxime, nalidixic acid, ceftazidime, norfloxacin, and ciprofloxacin
35
45.5
Resistant to six antibiotics


## 4. Discussion

Bacteria in food-producing animals are spread through the food chain. In Africa, the desire to optimize animal production has led to indiscriminate use of antibiotics. The heavy usage of antibiotics has been reported to be a risk factor for acquisition of ESBL-producing organisms resulting in an increased trend of resistance to commonly used antibiotics, namely, ampicillin, cotrimoxazole, gentamicin, erythromycin, tetracycline, and third generation cephalosporins [16]. In Zambia, drugstores which stock human and livestock antimicrobial agents are coming up without proper guidance on the dispensation of drugs. The inadequate monitoring of the drugstores in the nation has led people to easily access the livestock antibiotics without following the recommended laid down clinical prescription procedures thereby increasing the risk of ESBL in food animals. Detection of ESBL-producingE. coli isolates in poultry has not been fully conducted in Zambia. This cross sectional study revealed that an overall of 20% ESBL-producingE. coli isolates were detected in poultry. The high prevalence observed may be due to frequent administration of antimicrobials to poultry which in turn increases the risk of higher antimicrobial-resistantE. coli strains in the normal intestinal flora as observed in a study conducted by Carattoli [3]. In this study, it was established that food animals were possible reservoirs for resistant faecal flora particularlyE. coli. Furthermore, the high colonization rate could be attributed to cross contamination of poultry in abattoirs particularly during slaughtering and dressing. The processes of slaughtering and dressing are potential risk factors that may exacerbate the transmission rate of ESBL-producingE. coli resistant genes as described by Lavilla et al. [8] and Reich et al. [16].The predominant ESBL-producingE. coli gene identified in this study was blaCTX-M cluster with 13% which was relatively low in relation to 54.5% of blaCTX-M carryingE. coli isolated from poultry chickens in Britain [6]. In Zambia, the economic situation has led many residents to rearing broiler chickens as an income generating venture. This brings humans into close contact with poultry which could be a possible route of shedding ESBL producers into the environment. However, no detailed studies have yet been conducted in Zambia to specifically describe the types of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae present in apparently healthy chickens and other food animals.In addition, the study also showed that ESBL-producingE. coli isolates carried multiple types of beta-lactamase genes and that the combination of blaCTX-M+blaTEM cluster was predominant followed by blaSHV cluster and blaTEM cluster. This therefore confirms that ESBL-mediated plasmids are capable of carrying more than one beta-lactamase gene and thus result in high-level presence of beta-lactam resistant phenotypes as described by Rottier et al. [2]. Previous studies in Spain identifiedE. coli strains comprising blaCTX-M-14, blaCTX-M-9, and blaSHV-12 as the predominant ESBL-producing subtypes isolated among poultry [12].Antimicrobial susceptibility testing revealed interesting patterns with resistance rates observed in the majority of antimicrobial agents tested. From the antimicrobial susceptibility results, 85.7% (66/77; CI: 75.7–92) of isolates were resistant to chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, nalidixic acid, norfloxacin, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, and tetracycline. The findings are similar to studies conducted by Mshana et al. [10]. For instance, a study on published literature for Democratic Republic of Congo, Mozambique, Tanzania, and Zambia revealed an increased trend of resistance to ampicillin, cotrimoxazole, gentamicin, erythromycin, tetracycline, and third-generation cephalosporins [11]. In this study, high resistance rates to beta-lactam drugs, namely, ampicillin (100%), cefotaxime, and ceftazidime (100%), were observed among the isolates investigated. At least six phenotypes were observed from this study, indicating a wide diversity of resistance. Unfortunately, the study had a limitation as it was not able to establish the type of antimicrobials frequently used for poultry feed and growth promotion.


## 5. Conclusion

This is the first study to be conducted in Zambia on detection of ESBL-producingE. coli isolates in poultry. This therefore further confirms that poultry can be one of the major and potential reservoirs for the antimicrobial ESBL resistant genes which could spread into the food chain. The study has also shown a widespread occurrence of multidrug resistance patterns ofE. coli isolates in poultry.



---

*Source: 5275724-2016-04-17.xml*