# Research on Nonpoint Source Pollution Assessment Method in Data Sparse Regions: A Case Study of Xichong River Basin, China

Authors: Xing Liu; Donglong Li; Hongbo Zhang; Shixiang Cai; Xiaodong Li; Tianqi Ao
Journal: Advances in Meteorology
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

The NPS pollution is difficult to manage and control due to its complicated generation and formation mechanism, especially in the data sparse area. Thus the ECM and BTOPMC were, respectively, adopted to develop an easy and practical assessment method, and a comparison between the outputs of them is then conducted in this paper. The literature survey and field data were acquired to confirm the export coefficients of the ECM, and the loads of TN and TP were statistically analyzed in the study area. Based on hydrological similarity, runoff data from nearby gauged sites were pooled to compensate for the lack of at-site data and the water quality submodel of BTOPMC was then applied to simulate the monthly pollutant fluxes in the two sections from 2010 to 2012. The results showed agricultural fertilizer, rural sewage, and livestock and poultry sewage were the main pollution sources, and under the consideration of self-purification capacity of river, the outputs of the two models were almost identical. The proposed method with a main thought of combining and comparing an empirical model and a mechanistic model can assess the water quality conditions in the study area scientifically, which indicated it has a good potential for popularization in other regions.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The nonpoint source (NPS) pollution refers to the pollution that does not come from a specific, easily identifiable source and generally results from the scouring effect of rainfall or snowmelt, and the dissolved contaminant solids entered into the receiving water bodies (including rivers, lakes, reservoirs, and bays) through the process of runoff. NPS pollution, which can cause the eutrophication of water bodies or other forms of pollution [1], is generated from land use activities associated with agricultural development, rural areas, or uncontrolled urban runoff from development activities. The rural excessive and unreasonable use of pesticides and fertilizers, small-scale livestock manure, untreated waste in agricultural production, and rural garbage are the direct factors causing the NPS pollution. According to the reports by the United States and Japan, even though the point source pollution is fully controlled, the compliance rates of water, lake, and marine are only 56%, 42%, and 78%, respectively [2]. At present, NPS pollution becomes the leading cause of surface water impairment in many countries, such as UK, USA, and China [3]. China has already been the largest fertilizer consumer and is also the largest producing and using country of pesticides in the world [4], and NPS pollution, especially agricultural NPS, has already become a major contributing factor to water pollution and one of the important reasons for the deteriorating ecological environment in China [5, 6]. Therefore, the research of NPS pollution is of great importance for the restoration of water quality.Nowadays, developing a model to assess NPS pollution and taking appropriate preventive measures have attracted increasing attentions in the environmental research. NPS pollution assessment models can be generally divided into two types: mechanistic models and empirical models [2]. Combined with hydrological process, soil erosion process, and pollutants migration process, mechanistic model can simulate hydrodynamic and water quality transformation processes within the rivers. Most frequently used mechanistic models, such as QUAL2K [7], WASP6 [8], MIKE11 [9], SWAT [10], and AnnAGNPS [11], require time series of hydrometeorological data. Meanwhile, all sorts of data, such as land use, soil, population, livestock breeding, pesticide, and fertilizer use, should be collected and prepared for modeling [12]. In fact, it shows difficulties on practical applications especially in the watershed in most parts of China because the reliable related data are scarce and only very limited monitoring data for spatial and temporal variations of pollution sources and water quality are available. Besides, there are some complications. Taking the SWAT, a very promising and popular mechanistic model for modelling NPS pollution on the catchment scale for more than 20 years, as an example, it has hundreds of parameters with tremendous uncertainties to model outputs [13, 14], and how to detect the key parameters for calibration is one of the most difficult problems that restricted the use of SWAT. Compared with complex mechanistic model, the simple empirical model has the advantages of requiring less data and having fewer parameters. Based on the establishment of empirical relationship between the natural physical characteristics of the watershed and the output of pollutants, empirical model, such as export coefficient model (ECM) [3, 15] and source strength coefficient method [16], can easily calculate the NPS pollution loads in the outlet of the basin under the low requirement of inputting data and parameters setting. Although it can neither describe the hydrological pathways in determining nutrient delivery to surface waters and the mechanism of contaminant migration, furthermore, nor predict them in real time, it is still an ideal tool with strong practical and wide application in regions with sparse data.NPS pollution shows some characteristics, such as randomness, hysteresis, and uncertainty. Obviously, the selection of model should be based on the study purpose and data accessibility. An empirical model can easily give some necessary and useful assessment results and is less data demanding and a distributed simulation model can well characterize the NPS pollution process and provide more precise results to reflect the variety of quantitative pollution mechanism of pollutants and spatial-temporal distribution in detail as long as the space of the study area is discretized for better analysis, so to combine and compare an empirical model and a distributed simulation model is very attractive.The goal of this study was to establish a simple and practical NPS pollution assessment method for the data sparse regions. A basin in Xichong county, China, was taken as a case study in this study. Two widely used models including an empirical model and a physically based distributed hydrological model, ECM and BTOPMC, are adopted to build an easy and practical assessment method on NPS pollution. By integrating the advantages and comparing the results of the two models, a more objective assessment conclusion was obtained. The principles of this method were as follows: (1) it is to quantitatively assess the total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) which are the main pollutants in Xichong River basin by using the ECM and (2) based on hydrological similarity, the BTOPMC was adopted to solve the problem in regions with sparse hydrological data by using the parameter transferring method, trying to generate discrete grids in the space of study area, and quantitatively reflected the pollution mechanism of TN and TP by applying a simple submodel of water quality.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Study Area and Available Data

Xichong County, of which the latitude and longitude are 30°52′N~31°15′N and 104°4′E~105°36′E, is situated in the north part of Sichuan Province, China. It is in the back zone of Jialing River and Fujiang River and its altitude varies from 282 m to 569 m, lying northwest high and southeast low. The region is characterized by a subtropical monsoon humid climate and has an average precipitation of about 1000 mm per year, most of which occurs between July and September. Xichong River, which is the largest river in the Xichong County and flows through 23 villages and towns, includes two branches, the Hongxi River and Longtan River (Figure1). The Hongxi River has a total length of 42.5 km and the basin area is 289.87 km2, and the Longtan River has a total length of 39.8 km and the basin area is 189.73 km2. After the main stream flows out of the Xichong County, the river flows through Jialing district and Shunqing district in Nanchong city in the direction of southeast before importing the Jialing River.Figure 1
Stream network, division of influence regions, and the distribution of stations.Xichong River is regarded as the mother river in Xichong County. Not only is it an important regional water source for the basin along the river, but it also plays an important role in local environment protection and national economy development. Unfortunately, it has been seriously polluted since the 1980s. According to China’s water quality classification criteria, the monitoring results on the two sections (Yanjiaxiang section and Xiyangsi section, see Figure1) from 2010 to 2012 showed that the monthly concentrations of TN and TP were worse than that of the V class of water quality.The sources of the data used in this study include the following: (i) the terrain data was obtained from Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences Data Center (http://www.gscloud.cn/) which can provide 90 m × 90 m resolution digital elevation model (DEM) data; (ii) land use/vegetation cover type data was obtained from the Standard International Geosphere Biosphere Programme (IGBP) 1 km × 1 km resolution data which were provided by the US Geological Survey; (iii) the soil information was obtained from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) which can provide 1 km × 1 km resolution data; (iv) daily observed precipitation data from 2010 to 2012 in study area were provided by the Xichong meteorological station. The hydrometeorological data from 1985 to 1987 in hydrological reference basin were collected from the Hydrological Yearbook, Ministry of Water Resource, China; (v) in the study area, there are two water quality monitoring sites, Yanjiaxiang section in the Longtan River and Xiyangsi section in the Hongxi River. The two water quality monitoring sites have a total amount of water quality monitoring data for 20 months from September 2010 to April 2012 and all the data were provided by the local environmental monitoring department; (vi) the number of agricultural and nonagricultural populations, livestock, and poultry of each town was mainly provided by corresponding local government sectors, as well as the field survey for the local committees of the village, farmers, and scientific and technical personnel. All above the satellite data should be standardized to 300 m × 300 m in order to match the resolution of the BTOPMC calculation with ArcGIS software.


### 2.2. ECM Description

#### 2.2.1. Method

The ECM was first presented by Johnes and O’Sullivan in 1989 [17] and then modified by Johnes in 1990 [18]. The modified model takes some new nutrient export factors into account: inputs of nitrogen to the catchment through nitrogen fixation by each agricultural crop, areas of seminatural vegetation and woodland, whether human settlements were connected to a main sewage system or used a septic tank system, and notable land management practices known as the cause of the increases in nutrient export, such as the direct grazing of fodder crops on the fields by livestock and the cultivation of oilseed rape. The ECM has been recognized as an applicable and acceptable model for NPS pollution assessment; however, the ECM still has some limitations; for example, the ECM does not take the terrain and the uneven temporal-spatial distribution of precipitation into account, which are supposed to be the key factors affecting NPS pollution [19]. The modified model is formulated as follows: (1)
L
=
∑
i
=
1
n
E
i
A
i
I
i
+
p
,where L is the loss of nutrients, E
i is the export coefficient for the nutrient source i, A
i is the area of the land use type i, or the number of the livestock and poultry type i, or the population in the catchment, I
i is the input of the nutrients to source i, and p is the input of the nutrients from atmospheric deposition.


#### 2.2.2. Export Coefficients

The main nutrient sources can be identified into five categories: agricultural fertilizer pollution related to six kinds of land use types (such as natural woodland, wasteland, dry land, paddy fields, fruit woodland, urban land, and livestock), poultry pollution related to four kinds of types (such as cattle, pigs, sheep, and poultry), and rural and urban residential pollution. The determination of the ECM parameters (export coefficients) exerting greatest control over model output is usually summed up in three ways: the literature survey, field experiment, and the hydrological statistics, which can determine the export rate of nutrients (TN and TP) from each identifiable nutrient source to the surface stream network. These three methods have their respective advantages and disadvantages: (1) the literature survey is relatively easier and cheaper than the latter two methods, but with a lower accuracy; (2) the field experiment has the highest accuracy but needs more investment and is time consuming; (3) and the third method reflects the hydrological mechanism with higher accuracy [20] but requires a large amount of hydrological data and water quality data which is lacking in most medium and small basins of developing countries. Due to the shortage of the monitoring data, this study mainly adopted the literature survey [21–26] which makes sure the export coefficients are adjusted only within the range of data published for basins in upper reaches of Yangtze River combined with the field data, such as land use, the agricultural and nonagricultural population of each town, the dosage of the chemical fertilizer, and the number of the livestock and poultry to determine the export coefficients. The export coefficients in this study were determined in Table 1.Table 1
The classification and value of export coefficient in study area.
Type
Land use/t⋅km−2⋅yr−1
Livestock and poultry/t⋅(104 ca⋅yr)−1
Ruralpopulation/t⋅(104 ca⋅yr)−1
Dry land
Paddy field
Fruit woodland
Natural woodland
Waste land
Urban
Cattle
Pig
Sheep
Poultry
TN
0.115
0.075
0.040
0.119
0.745
0.550
3.660
0.695
0.700
0.030
18.700
TP
0.006
0.006
0.003
0.009
0.031
0.014
0.186
0.085
0.027
0.003
2.140


### 2.3. BTOPMC Description

BTOPMC is a physically based distributed hydrological model, in which runoff and nutrient are transported grid by grid along stream networks, and it consists of some submodels for topographical analysis, TOPMODEL based runoff generation, and Muskingum-Cunge flow routing [27–30]. A submodel of water quality was originally developed by Zhang [31] which has the ability to simulate pollutants migration in slope surface and pollutants migration and transformation in channel. The model can not only effectively show the spatial-temporal heterogeneity of topography, soil, land use, and pollution load but also reflect the response of the quantity and quality of water caused by natural variations and human activities. The mechanism of pollutants (including TN and TP) transformation on channel is based on the SWAT concept [32] and the process of pollutants migration on channel and slope surface is based on mass balance of pollutants within the grid established. It is outlined as follows [31]:(2)
Δ
T
N
=
∑
T
N
s
e
l
f
_
i
n
+
∑
T
N
d
i
r
e
c
t
_
i
n
+
∑
C
T
N
_
i
n
V
i
n
-
C
T
N
_
o
u
t
V
o
u
t
,
V
i
n
=
q
i
n
i
_
i
n
+
q
e
n
d
_
i
n
2
Δ
t
,
V
o
u
t
=
q
i
n
i
_
o
u
t
+
q
e
n
d
_
o
u
t
2
Δ
t
,where Δ
T
N is the mass change of water pollutants in the grid within the period, ∑
T
N
s
e
l
f
_
i
n is the self-generated or reduction amount of pollutants in the grid within the period, ∑
T
N
d
i
r
e
c
t
_
i
n is the direct human-activity-caused amount of pollutants in the grid within the period, V
i
n is the inflow of water body in the grid within the period, V
o
u
t is the outflow of water body in the grid within the period, q
i
n
i
_
i
n is the initial inflow, q
i
n
i
_
o
u
t is the initial outflow, q
e
n
d
_
i
n is the final inflow, q
e
n
d
_
o
u
t is the final outflow, C
T
N
_
i
n is the input of pollutant concentration in the grid, and C
T
N
_
o
u
t is the output of pollutant concentration in the grid.The parameters related to runoff generating and flow routing in BTOPMC have physical meaning and can reflect the physical characteristics of underlying surface in the basin. Due to the characteristics of parsimonious calibrated parameters, relatively low requirement on inputs, being simple to operate and able to take advantage of satellite remote-sensing data, and so forth, BTOPMC can be applied to ungauged basins for hydrological simulation [33]. The main structure of BTOPMC is shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
The main structure of BTOPMC.


## 2.1. Study Area and Available Data

Xichong County, of which the latitude and longitude are 30°52′N~31°15′N and 104°4′E~105°36′E, is situated in the north part of Sichuan Province, China. It is in the back zone of Jialing River and Fujiang River and its altitude varies from 282 m to 569 m, lying northwest high and southeast low. The region is characterized by a subtropical monsoon humid climate and has an average precipitation of about 1000 mm per year, most of which occurs between July and September. Xichong River, which is the largest river in the Xichong County and flows through 23 villages and towns, includes two branches, the Hongxi River and Longtan River (Figure1). The Hongxi River has a total length of 42.5 km and the basin area is 289.87 km2, and the Longtan River has a total length of 39.8 km and the basin area is 189.73 km2. After the main stream flows out of the Xichong County, the river flows through Jialing district and Shunqing district in Nanchong city in the direction of southeast before importing the Jialing River.Figure 1
Stream network, division of influence regions, and the distribution of stations.Xichong River is regarded as the mother river in Xichong County. Not only is it an important regional water source for the basin along the river, but it also plays an important role in local environment protection and national economy development. Unfortunately, it has been seriously polluted since the 1980s. According to China’s water quality classification criteria, the monitoring results on the two sections (Yanjiaxiang section and Xiyangsi section, see Figure1) from 2010 to 2012 showed that the monthly concentrations of TN and TP were worse than that of the V class of water quality.The sources of the data used in this study include the following: (i) the terrain data was obtained from Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences Data Center (http://www.gscloud.cn/) which can provide 90 m × 90 m resolution digital elevation model (DEM) data; (ii) land use/vegetation cover type data was obtained from the Standard International Geosphere Biosphere Programme (IGBP) 1 km × 1 km resolution data which were provided by the US Geological Survey; (iii) the soil information was obtained from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) which can provide 1 km × 1 km resolution data; (iv) daily observed precipitation data from 2010 to 2012 in study area were provided by the Xichong meteorological station. The hydrometeorological data from 1985 to 1987 in hydrological reference basin were collected from the Hydrological Yearbook, Ministry of Water Resource, China; (v) in the study area, there are two water quality monitoring sites, Yanjiaxiang section in the Longtan River and Xiyangsi section in the Hongxi River. The two water quality monitoring sites have a total amount of water quality monitoring data for 20 months from September 2010 to April 2012 and all the data were provided by the local environmental monitoring department; (vi) the number of agricultural and nonagricultural populations, livestock, and poultry of each town was mainly provided by corresponding local government sectors, as well as the field survey for the local committees of the village, farmers, and scientific and technical personnel. All above the satellite data should be standardized to 300 m × 300 m in order to match the resolution of the BTOPMC calculation with ArcGIS software.


## 2.2. ECM Description

### 2.2.1. Method

The ECM was first presented by Johnes and O’Sullivan in 1989 [17] and then modified by Johnes in 1990 [18]. The modified model takes some new nutrient export factors into account: inputs of nitrogen to the catchment through nitrogen fixation by each agricultural crop, areas of seminatural vegetation and woodland, whether human settlements were connected to a main sewage system or used a septic tank system, and notable land management practices known as the cause of the increases in nutrient export, such as the direct grazing of fodder crops on the fields by livestock and the cultivation of oilseed rape. The ECM has been recognized as an applicable and acceptable model for NPS pollution assessment; however, the ECM still has some limitations; for example, the ECM does not take the terrain and the uneven temporal-spatial distribution of precipitation into account, which are supposed to be the key factors affecting NPS pollution [19]. The modified model is formulated as follows: (1)
L
=
∑
i
=
1
n
E
i
A
i
I
i
+
p
,where L is the loss of nutrients, E
i is the export coefficient for the nutrient source i, A
i is the area of the land use type i, or the number of the livestock and poultry type i, or the population in the catchment, I
i is the input of the nutrients to source i, and p is the input of the nutrients from atmospheric deposition.


### 2.2.2. Export Coefficients

The main nutrient sources can be identified into five categories: agricultural fertilizer pollution related to six kinds of land use types (such as natural woodland, wasteland, dry land, paddy fields, fruit woodland, urban land, and livestock), poultry pollution related to four kinds of types (such as cattle, pigs, sheep, and poultry), and rural and urban residential pollution. The determination of the ECM parameters (export coefficients) exerting greatest control over model output is usually summed up in three ways: the literature survey, field experiment, and the hydrological statistics, which can determine the export rate of nutrients (TN and TP) from each identifiable nutrient source to the surface stream network. These three methods have their respective advantages and disadvantages: (1) the literature survey is relatively easier and cheaper than the latter two methods, but with a lower accuracy; (2) the field experiment has the highest accuracy but needs more investment and is time consuming; (3) and the third method reflects the hydrological mechanism with higher accuracy [20] but requires a large amount of hydrological data and water quality data which is lacking in most medium and small basins of developing countries. Due to the shortage of the monitoring data, this study mainly adopted the literature survey [21–26] which makes sure the export coefficients are adjusted only within the range of data published for basins in upper reaches of Yangtze River combined with the field data, such as land use, the agricultural and nonagricultural population of each town, the dosage of the chemical fertilizer, and the number of the livestock and poultry to determine the export coefficients. The export coefficients in this study were determined in Table 1.Table 1
The classification and value of export coefficient in study area.
Type
Land use/t⋅km−2⋅yr−1
Livestock and poultry/t⋅(104 ca⋅yr)−1
Ruralpopulation/t⋅(104 ca⋅yr)−1
Dry land
Paddy field
Fruit woodland
Natural woodland
Waste land
Urban
Cattle
Pig
Sheep
Poultry
TN
0.115
0.075
0.040
0.119
0.745
0.550
3.660
0.695
0.700
0.030
18.700
TP
0.006
0.006
0.003
0.009
0.031
0.014
0.186
0.085
0.027
0.003
2.140


## 2.2.1. Method

The ECM was first presented by Johnes and O’Sullivan in 1989 [17] and then modified by Johnes in 1990 [18]. The modified model takes some new nutrient export factors into account: inputs of nitrogen to the catchment through nitrogen fixation by each agricultural crop, areas of seminatural vegetation and woodland, whether human settlements were connected to a main sewage system or used a septic tank system, and notable land management practices known as the cause of the increases in nutrient export, such as the direct grazing of fodder crops on the fields by livestock and the cultivation of oilseed rape. The ECM has been recognized as an applicable and acceptable model for NPS pollution assessment; however, the ECM still has some limitations; for example, the ECM does not take the terrain and the uneven temporal-spatial distribution of precipitation into account, which are supposed to be the key factors affecting NPS pollution [19]. The modified model is formulated as follows: (1)
L
=
∑
i
=
1
n
E
i
A
i
I
i
+
p
,where L is the loss of nutrients, E
i is the export coefficient for the nutrient source i, A
i is the area of the land use type i, or the number of the livestock and poultry type i, or the population in the catchment, I
i is the input of the nutrients to source i, and p is the input of the nutrients from atmospheric deposition.


## 2.2.2. Export Coefficients

The main nutrient sources can be identified into five categories: agricultural fertilizer pollution related to six kinds of land use types (such as natural woodland, wasteland, dry land, paddy fields, fruit woodland, urban land, and livestock), poultry pollution related to four kinds of types (such as cattle, pigs, sheep, and poultry), and rural and urban residential pollution. The determination of the ECM parameters (export coefficients) exerting greatest control over model output is usually summed up in three ways: the literature survey, field experiment, and the hydrological statistics, which can determine the export rate of nutrients (TN and TP) from each identifiable nutrient source to the surface stream network. These three methods have their respective advantages and disadvantages: (1) the literature survey is relatively easier and cheaper than the latter two methods, but with a lower accuracy; (2) the field experiment has the highest accuracy but needs more investment and is time consuming; (3) and the third method reflects the hydrological mechanism with higher accuracy [20] but requires a large amount of hydrological data and water quality data which is lacking in most medium and small basins of developing countries. Due to the shortage of the monitoring data, this study mainly adopted the literature survey [21–26] which makes sure the export coefficients are adjusted only within the range of data published for basins in upper reaches of Yangtze River combined with the field data, such as land use, the agricultural and nonagricultural population of each town, the dosage of the chemical fertilizer, and the number of the livestock and poultry to determine the export coefficients. The export coefficients in this study were determined in Table 1.Table 1
The classification and value of export coefficient in study area.
Type
Land use/t⋅km−2⋅yr−1
Livestock and poultry/t⋅(104 ca⋅yr)−1
Ruralpopulation/t⋅(104 ca⋅yr)−1
Dry land
Paddy field
Fruit woodland
Natural woodland
Waste land
Urban
Cattle
Pig
Sheep
Poultry
TN
0.115
0.075
0.040
0.119
0.745
0.550
3.660
0.695
0.700
0.030
18.700
TP
0.006
0.006
0.003
0.009
0.031
0.014
0.186
0.085
0.027
0.003
2.140


## 2.3. BTOPMC Description

BTOPMC is a physically based distributed hydrological model, in which runoff and nutrient are transported grid by grid along stream networks, and it consists of some submodels for topographical analysis, TOPMODEL based runoff generation, and Muskingum-Cunge flow routing [27–30]. A submodel of water quality was originally developed by Zhang [31] which has the ability to simulate pollutants migration in slope surface and pollutants migration and transformation in channel. The model can not only effectively show the spatial-temporal heterogeneity of topography, soil, land use, and pollution load but also reflect the response of the quantity and quality of water caused by natural variations and human activities. The mechanism of pollutants (including TN and TP) transformation on channel is based on the SWAT concept [32] and the process of pollutants migration on channel and slope surface is based on mass balance of pollutants within the grid established. It is outlined as follows [31]:(2)
Δ
T
N
=
∑
T
N
s
e
l
f
_
i
n
+
∑
T
N
d
i
r
e
c
t
_
i
n
+
∑
C
T
N
_
i
n
V
i
n
-
C
T
N
_
o
u
t
V
o
u
t
,
V
i
n
=
q
i
n
i
_
i
n
+
q
e
n
d
_
i
n
2
Δ
t
,
V
o
u
t
=
q
i
n
i
_
o
u
t
+
q
e
n
d
_
o
u
t
2
Δ
t
,where Δ
T
N is the mass change of water pollutants in the grid within the period, ∑
T
N
s
e
l
f
_
i
n is the self-generated or reduction amount of pollutants in the grid within the period, ∑
T
N
d
i
r
e
c
t
_
i
n is the direct human-activity-caused amount of pollutants in the grid within the period, V
i
n is the inflow of water body in the grid within the period, V
o
u
t is the outflow of water body in the grid within the period, q
i
n
i
_
i
n is the initial inflow, q
i
n
i
_
o
u
t is the initial outflow, q
e
n
d
_
i
n is the final inflow, q
e
n
d
_
o
u
t is the final outflow, C
T
N
_
i
n is the input of pollutant concentration in the grid, and C
T
N
_
o
u
t is the output of pollutant concentration in the grid.The parameters related to runoff generating and flow routing in BTOPMC have physical meaning and can reflect the physical characteristics of underlying surface in the basin. Due to the characteristics of parsimonious calibrated parameters, relatively low requirement on inputs, being simple to operate and able to take advantage of satellite remote-sensing data, and so forth, BTOPMC can be applied to ungauged basins for hydrological simulation [33]. The main structure of BTOPMC is shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
The main structure of BTOPMC.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Calculation of TN and TP Based on ECM

The loads of all kinds of pollution sources (TN and TP) in study area in 2012 can be calculated by the ECM general expression after the export coefficient and data source information are determined. And they were summed to obtain the total area loads as shown in Table2. According to Table 2, the polluted loads of TN and TP in this area are 868.50 t·yr−1 and 65.08 t·yr−1, respectively.Table 2
TN and TP loads calculation of all kinds of pollution sources in 2012 (unit: ton⋅yr−1).
Types
Types of pollution source
TN
Proportion/%
TP
Proportion/%
Land use
Dry land
Fertilizer
340.84
39.24
9.47
14.55
Paddy field
97.28
11.20
4.24
6.52
Orchard
2.36
0.27
0.10
0.15
Natural woodland
19.85
2.29
1.50
2.30
Waste land
3.63
0.42
0.15
0.23
Subtotal
463.96
53.42
15.46
23.76
Urban land
Urban runoff
24.77
2.85
0.65
1.00
Livestock and poultry
Cattle
Livestock and poultry
10.05
1.16
0.51
0.78
Pig
70.85
8.16
8.70
13.37
Sheep
11.09
1.28
0.43
0.66
Poultry
5.15
0.59
0.51
0.78
Subtotal
97.13
11.18
10.16
15.61
Population
Rural population
Rural sewage
202.96
23.37
27.87
42.82
Urban  population
Urban  Sewage
79.67
9.17
10.94
16.81
Total
868.5
100.00
65.08
100.00The estimated average TN and TP load intensities are 1.811 ton·km−2·yr−1 and 0.136 t·km−2·yr−1, respectively. The results of source apportionment are shown in Figure 3 and it shows that the agricultural fertilizer and sewage from rural residents contribute the most to TN and TP which is because the sewage from residents and livestock is often simply processed through septic tanks and digesters due to the lack of proper sewage pipe network and sewage treatment facilities in the study area. Thus, the generated biogas can be directly used as energy resource and a large amount of chemical fertilizers can be used in agricultural production with low utilization rates, which causes serious NPS pollution. The major sources of TN are agricultural fertilizer, which accounted for 53.42% of the total, followed by rural sewage (23.37%) and livestock and poultry sewage (11.18%). Besides, urban sewage is also a major polluted source. Among those six land use types, dry land, paddy field, and natural woodland which have been fertilized contribute the most (52.73%). Rice, wheat, and corn are the dominant crops in agricultural land. To improve the economic yield from these crops, large doses of fertilizer have been used, which in turn raised environmental contamination level. Furthermore, crop residues, which are not systematically managed, are an N-rich pollution source [34]. The major sources of TP ranked differently from those of TN, with rural sewage (42.82%), followed by agricultural fertilizer (23.76%), urban sewage (16.81%), and livestock and poultry sewage (15.61%). Taking into account the synthetic factors for loads TN and TP, therefore agricultural fertilizer, rural sewage, and livestock and poultry sewage are the main pollution sources influencing loads of nonpoint source nitrogen and phosphorus in the study area. Obviously, these sources should be controlled first.Figure 3
TN and TP load of all kinds of pollution source distribution figure.One limitation of this ECM is that calibration of export coefficients is not based on hydrological and water quality data and may affect the accuracy of the calculation. But available field data are reliable, and the ECM can identify to some extent the main pollution sources and reflect NPS pollution status in study area. Furthermore, compared with output of BTOPMC, the calculation of the ECM can be assessed scientifically.


### 3.2. Simulation by BTOPMC

#### 3.2.1. Runoff Simulation

Runoff data in control sections are required to simulate the water quality, but there is no measured runoff data in Xichong River basin. Therefore, the BTOPMC was adopted to simulate the daily average runoff in 2010 and 2011 by the transplantation of hydrological parameters derived from Lizixi River. Lizixi River basin (Figure1) is about 40 km away from the Xichong River basin. They share the same climate zone and show similarities about the basin area, annual rainfall, temperature, soil, and the land use.The daily runoff data from 1985 to 1986 at Zhaojiaci station in Lizixi River basin were applied to calibrate the parameters and the daily runoff data in 1987 were used for validation. Figure4 shows the simulated and observed hydrographs of the flood and the long-term case (including calibration and validation periods). It can be seen that most of the simulated hydrograph agrees well with observed, except the low flow. The simulated discharges during dry season of calibration period were notably higher than those observed. This discrepancy might have been caused by the influences of water use systems or limited by the resolution of the soil and land cove map. The Nash efficiency coefficients [35] of calibration and validation periods were determined to be 67.9% and 76.30%, respectively.Figure 4
Calibration and validation results in Lizixi River basin: observed and simulated daily hydrographs.Parameter transferring from Lizixi River basin to the Xichong River basin was needed before the daily runoff processes of Xiyangsi section and Yanjiaxiang section in Xichong River basin were simulated by BTOPMC (Figure5). The simulated results show that the yearly average flows of Xiyangsi section and Yanjiaxiang section in 2010 and 2011 are 2.47 m3/s and 1.89 m3/s, respectively, and the maximum yearly flows are 68.47 m3/s and 53.00 m3/s, respectively, which both appear in the 506th day. From Figure 5, it can be seen that there is an obvious corresponding relationship between the process of daily runoff and rainfall sequences. Meanwhile, the runoff coefficient is 0.36 which fits the range of runoff coefficient in Jialing River basin (the runoff coefficients in Beibei station and Shanxi station are 0.37 and 0.28, resp.). From the analysis above, the simulated results related to the runoff are reasonable.Figure 5
Precipitation and simulated daily hydrographs at water quality monitoring stations.


#### 3.2.2. Water Quality Simulation

The model parameters related to the TN and TP are calibrated and validated by using the data measured in Xiyangsi section and Yanjiaxiang section. The data for calibration are monthly measured from September 2010 to August 2011 and the data for validation are monthly measured data from September 2011 to April 2012. The calibration and validation results show that all Nash efficiency coefficients are above 50%, of which the Nash efficiency coefficient in Yanjiaxiang section is 67.24% (Table3). By comparing the simulated and measured curve, it is obvious that this model can offer reasonable simulations of actual water quality, but it shows some gaps in the peak value in the curve between the simulated and measured data due to the relatively low accuracy of simulation at some node points (Figures 6 and 7). Overall, the calibrated model is comparatively efficient for simulating the process of nonpoint resources pollution.Table 3
The evaluation of calibration and validation of the model.
Period
Section
Pollutants
The efficiency of Nash (%)
Calibration
Yanjiaxiang
TN
67.24
TP
52.31
Xiyangsi
TN
59.05
TP
53.12
Validation
Yanjiaxiang
TN
55.64
TP
53.07
Xiyangsi
TN
57.3
TP
54.2Figure 6
Observed and simulated TN and TP at Yanjiaxiang or Xiyangsi (monthly calibration period).Figure 7
Observed and simulated TN and TP at Yanjiaxiang or Xiyangsi (monthly validation period).The NPS pollutions in the Longtan River and Hongxi River were simulated from 2010 to 2012 by using calibrated model. The simulated annual fluxes of these two sections are shown in Table4, which indicates a growing trend about the TN and TP from 2010 to 2012. In 2012, the total flux of TN in two sections is 642.55 t, of which the flux of TN amounts to 362.58 t in Hongxi River section and 279.98 t in Longtan River section. And the fluxes of TP in two sections amount to 50.7 t, of which the flux of TP in Hongxi River section and Longtan River section is 33.62 t and 17.08 t, respectively. It indicates that the flux of pollution in Hongxi River is more than that in Longtan River and this phenomenon is highly related to the area of basin, population distribution, industrial structure, and other factors. The area of Hongxi River basin and Longtan River basin is 289.86 km2 and 189.73 km2.Table 4
The simulated results of pollutant loads in TN and TP.
Year
Index
2010
2011
2012
Longtan River
Average flow (unit: m3/s)
0.7
3.08
4.94
TN (unit: ton)
79.13
199.21
279.98
TP (unit:  ton)
7.73
16.69
17.08
Hongxi River
Average flow (Unit: m3/s)
0.96
3.98
6.32
TN (unit: ton)
146.24
269.2
362.58
TP (unit: ton)
11.05
26.13
33.62
Total
TN (unit: ton)
225.37
468.41
642.55
TP (unit: ton)
18.78
42.82
50.7The ECM and BTOPMC were, respectively, adopted to calculate pollutant loads in Xichong River in 2012. The comparisons of results of the two models are listed in Table5. The statistical results by the ECM are the yearly input amount of pollutants and the simulated results by BTOPMC are the fluxes of pollutants in two sections. The differences between the outputs of the two models can reflect the self-purification capacity of the river. The simulated results indicate that the differences of TN and TP in Hongxi River sections are 167.73 t and 6.87 t, respectively, while those in Longtan River are 58.21 t and 7.51 t, respectively, which reflect that the self-purification capacity of the Hongxi River is higher than that of Longtan River. According to the runoff data, the yearly average runoff in Hongxi River and Longtan River is 6.32 m3/s and 4.94 m3/s, respectively. The yearly average runoff in Hongxi River is larger than that in Longtan River which also reflects that the self-purification capacity of the Hongxi River is higher than that of Longtan River. In summary, considering self-purification capacity of rivers and a reliable calibration of the BTOPMC against the observed TN and TP concentrations in the two water quality monitoring sites, results of statistical analysis and mechanistic model simulation are mostly identical and reasonable.Table 5
The comparison of loads in TP and TN between the ECM and BTOPMC model  (unit: ton).
Pollutants
Data source
Hongxi River
Longtan River
TN
ECM
530.31
338.19
BTOPMC
362.58
279.98
Difference
167.73
58.21
TP
ECM
40.49
24.59
BTOPMC
33.62
17.08
Difference
6.87
7.51
Note: the statistical results by ECM are expressed as the amount of pollutants which are input to the river in 2012. The results by BTOPMC are expressed as the yearly fluxes of pollutants in sections in 2012. The amount of difference between these two results reflects the environmental capacity and self-purification capacity of rivers.


## 3.1. Calculation of TN and TP Based on ECM

The loads of all kinds of pollution sources (TN and TP) in study area in 2012 can be calculated by the ECM general expression after the export coefficient and data source information are determined. And they were summed to obtain the total area loads as shown in Table2. According to Table 2, the polluted loads of TN and TP in this area are 868.50 t·yr−1 and 65.08 t·yr−1, respectively.Table 2
TN and TP loads calculation of all kinds of pollution sources in 2012 (unit: ton⋅yr−1).
Types
Types of pollution source
TN
Proportion/%
TP
Proportion/%
Land use
Dry land
Fertilizer
340.84
39.24
9.47
14.55
Paddy field
97.28
11.20
4.24
6.52
Orchard
2.36
0.27
0.10
0.15
Natural woodland
19.85
2.29
1.50
2.30
Waste land
3.63
0.42
0.15
0.23
Subtotal
463.96
53.42
15.46
23.76
Urban land
Urban runoff
24.77
2.85
0.65
1.00
Livestock and poultry
Cattle
Livestock and poultry
10.05
1.16
0.51
0.78
Pig
70.85
8.16
8.70
13.37
Sheep
11.09
1.28
0.43
0.66
Poultry
5.15
0.59
0.51
0.78
Subtotal
97.13
11.18
10.16
15.61
Population
Rural population
Rural sewage
202.96
23.37
27.87
42.82
Urban  population
Urban  Sewage
79.67
9.17
10.94
16.81
Total
868.5
100.00
65.08
100.00The estimated average TN and TP load intensities are 1.811 ton·km−2·yr−1 and 0.136 t·km−2·yr−1, respectively. The results of source apportionment are shown in Figure 3 and it shows that the agricultural fertilizer and sewage from rural residents contribute the most to TN and TP which is because the sewage from residents and livestock is often simply processed through septic tanks and digesters due to the lack of proper sewage pipe network and sewage treatment facilities in the study area. Thus, the generated biogas can be directly used as energy resource and a large amount of chemical fertilizers can be used in agricultural production with low utilization rates, which causes serious NPS pollution. The major sources of TN are agricultural fertilizer, which accounted for 53.42% of the total, followed by rural sewage (23.37%) and livestock and poultry sewage (11.18%). Besides, urban sewage is also a major polluted source. Among those six land use types, dry land, paddy field, and natural woodland which have been fertilized contribute the most (52.73%). Rice, wheat, and corn are the dominant crops in agricultural land. To improve the economic yield from these crops, large doses of fertilizer have been used, which in turn raised environmental contamination level. Furthermore, crop residues, which are not systematically managed, are an N-rich pollution source [34]. The major sources of TP ranked differently from those of TN, with rural sewage (42.82%), followed by agricultural fertilizer (23.76%), urban sewage (16.81%), and livestock and poultry sewage (15.61%). Taking into account the synthetic factors for loads TN and TP, therefore agricultural fertilizer, rural sewage, and livestock and poultry sewage are the main pollution sources influencing loads of nonpoint source nitrogen and phosphorus in the study area. Obviously, these sources should be controlled first.Figure 3
TN and TP load of all kinds of pollution source distribution figure.One limitation of this ECM is that calibration of export coefficients is not based on hydrological and water quality data and may affect the accuracy of the calculation. But available field data are reliable, and the ECM can identify to some extent the main pollution sources and reflect NPS pollution status in study area. Furthermore, compared with output of BTOPMC, the calculation of the ECM can be assessed scientifically.


## 3.2. Simulation by BTOPMC

### 3.2.1. Runoff Simulation

Runoff data in control sections are required to simulate the water quality, but there is no measured runoff data in Xichong River basin. Therefore, the BTOPMC was adopted to simulate the daily average runoff in 2010 and 2011 by the transplantation of hydrological parameters derived from Lizixi River. Lizixi River basin (Figure1) is about 40 km away from the Xichong River basin. They share the same climate zone and show similarities about the basin area, annual rainfall, temperature, soil, and the land use.The daily runoff data from 1985 to 1986 at Zhaojiaci station in Lizixi River basin were applied to calibrate the parameters and the daily runoff data in 1987 were used for validation. Figure4 shows the simulated and observed hydrographs of the flood and the long-term case (including calibration and validation periods). It can be seen that most of the simulated hydrograph agrees well with observed, except the low flow. The simulated discharges during dry season of calibration period were notably higher than those observed. This discrepancy might have been caused by the influences of water use systems or limited by the resolution of the soil and land cove map. The Nash efficiency coefficients [35] of calibration and validation periods were determined to be 67.9% and 76.30%, respectively.Figure 4
Calibration and validation results in Lizixi River basin: observed and simulated daily hydrographs.Parameter transferring from Lizixi River basin to the Xichong River basin was needed before the daily runoff processes of Xiyangsi section and Yanjiaxiang section in Xichong River basin were simulated by BTOPMC (Figure5). The simulated results show that the yearly average flows of Xiyangsi section and Yanjiaxiang section in 2010 and 2011 are 2.47 m3/s and 1.89 m3/s, respectively, and the maximum yearly flows are 68.47 m3/s and 53.00 m3/s, respectively, which both appear in the 506th day. From Figure 5, it can be seen that there is an obvious corresponding relationship between the process of daily runoff and rainfall sequences. Meanwhile, the runoff coefficient is 0.36 which fits the range of runoff coefficient in Jialing River basin (the runoff coefficients in Beibei station and Shanxi station are 0.37 and 0.28, resp.). From the analysis above, the simulated results related to the runoff are reasonable.Figure 5
Precipitation and simulated daily hydrographs at water quality monitoring stations.


### 3.2.2. Water Quality Simulation

The model parameters related to the TN and TP are calibrated and validated by using the data measured in Xiyangsi section and Yanjiaxiang section. The data for calibration are monthly measured from September 2010 to August 2011 and the data for validation are monthly measured data from September 2011 to April 2012. The calibration and validation results show that all Nash efficiency coefficients are above 50%, of which the Nash efficiency coefficient in Yanjiaxiang section is 67.24% (Table3). By comparing the simulated and measured curve, it is obvious that this model can offer reasonable simulations of actual water quality, but it shows some gaps in the peak value in the curve between the simulated and measured data due to the relatively low accuracy of simulation at some node points (Figures 6 and 7). Overall, the calibrated model is comparatively efficient for simulating the process of nonpoint resources pollution.Table 3
The evaluation of calibration and validation of the model.
Period
Section
Pollutants
The efficiency of Nash (%)
Calibration
Yanjiaxiang
TN
67.24
TP
52.31
Xiyangsi
TN
59.05
TP
53.12
Validation
Yanjiaxiang
TN
55.64
TP
53.07
Xiyangsi
TN
57.3
TP
54.2Figure 6
Observed and simulated TN and TP at Yanjiaxiang or Xiyangsi (monthly calibration period).Figure 7
Observed and simulated TN and TP at Yanjiaxiang or Xiyangsi (monthly validation period).The NPS pollutions in the Longtan River and Hongxi River were simulated from 2010 to 2012 by using calibrated model. The simulated annual fluxes of these two sections are shown in Table4, which indicates a growing trend about the TN and TP from 2010 to 2012. In 2012, the total flux of TN in two sections is 642.55 t, of which the flux of TN amounts to 362.58 t in Hongxi River section and 279.98 t in Longtan River section. And the fluxes of TP in two sections amount to 50.7 t, of which the flux of TP in Hongxi River section and Longtan River section is 33.62 t and 17.08 t, respectively. It indicates that the flux of pollution in Hongxi River is more than that in Longtan River and this phenomenon is highly related to the area of basin, population distribution, industrial structure, and other factors. The area of Hongxi River basin and Longtan River basin is 289.86 km2 and 189.73 km2.Table 4
The simulated results of pollutant loads in TN and TP.
Year
Index
2010
2011
2012
Longtan River
Average flow (unit: m3/s)
0.7
3.08
4.94
TN (unit: ton)
79.13
199.21
279.98
TP (unit:  ton)
7.73
16.69
17.08
Hongxi River
Average flow (Unit: m3/s)
0.96
3.98
6.32
TN (unit: ton)
146.24
269.2
362.58
TP (unit: ton)
11.05
26.13
33.62
Total
TN (unit: ton)
225.37
468.41
642.55
TP (unit: ton)
18.78
42.82
50.7The ECM and BTOPMC were, respectively, adopted to calculate pollutant loads in Xichong River in 2012. The comparisons of results of the two models are listed in Table5. The statistical results by the ECM are the yearly input amount of pollutants and the simulated results by BTOPMC are the fluxes of pollutants in two sections. The differences between the outputs of the two models can reflect the self-purification capacity of the river. The simulated results indicate that the differences of TN and TP in Hongxi River sections are 167.73 t and 6.87 t, respectively, while those in Longtan River are 58.21 t and 7.51 t, respectively, which reflect that the self-purification capacity of the Hongxi River is higher than that of Longtan River. According to the runoff data, the yearly average runoff in Hongxi River and Longtan River is 6.32 m3/s and 4.94 m3/s, respectively. The yearly average runoff in Hongxi River is larger than that in Longtan River which also reflects that the self-purification capacity of the Hongxi River is higher than that of Longtan River. In summary, considering self-purification capacity of rivers and a reliable calibration of the BTOPMC against the observed TN and TP concentrations in the two water quality monitoring sites, results of statistical analysis and mechanistic model simulation are mostly identical and reasonable.Table 5
The comparison of loads in TP and TN between the ECM and BTOPMC model  (unit: ton).
Pollutants
Data source
Hongxi River
Longtan River
TN
ECM
530.31
338.19
BTOPMC
362.58
279.98
Difference
167.73
58.21
TP
ECM
40.49
24.59
BTOPMC
33.62
17.08
Difference
6.87
7.51
Note: the statistical results by ECM are expressed as the amount of pollutants which are input to the river in 2012. The results by BTOPMC are expressed as the yearly fluxes of pollutants in sections in 2012. The amount of difference between these two results reflects the environmental capacity and self-purification capacity of rivers.


## 3.2.1. Runoff Simulation

Runoff data in control sections are required to simulate the water quality, but there is no measured runoff data in Xichong River basin. Therefore, the BTOPMC was adopted to simulate the daily average runoff in 2010 and 2011 by the transplantation of hydrological parameters derived from Lizixi River. Lizixi River basin (Figure1) is about 40 km away from the Xichong River basin. They share the same climate zone and show similarities about the basin area, annual rainfall, temperature, soil, and the land use.The daily runoff data from 1985 to 1986 at Zhaojiaci station in Lizixi River basin were applied to calibrate the parameters and the daily runoff data in 1987 were used for validation. Figure4 shows the simulated and observed hydrographs of the flood and the long-term case (including calibration and validation periods). It can be seen that most of the simulated hydrograph agrees well with observed, except the low flow. The simulated discharges during dry season of calibration period were notably higher than those observed. This discrepancy might have been caused by the influences of water use systems or limited by the resolution of the soil and land cove map. The Nash efficiency coefficients [35] of calibration and validation periods were determined to be 67.9% and 76.30%, respectively.Figure 4
Calibration and validation results in Lizixi River basin: observed and simulated daily hydrographs.Parameter transferring from Lizixi River basin to the Xichong River basin was needed before the daily runoff processes of Xiyangsi section and Yanjiaxiang section in Xichong River basin were simulated by BTOPMC (Figure5). The simulated results show that the yearly average flows of Xiyangsi section and Yanjiaxiang section in 2010 and 2011 are 2.47 m3/s and 1.89 m3/s, respectively, and the maximum yearly flows are 68.47 m3/s and 53.00 m3/s, respectively, which both appear in the 506th day. From Figure 5, it can be seen that there is an obvious corresponding relationship between the process of daily runoff and rainfall sequences. Meanwhile, the runoff coefficient is 0.36 which fits the range of runoff coefficient in Jialing River basin (the runoff coefficients in Beibei station and Shanxi station are 0.37 and 0.28, resp.). From the analysis above, the simulated results related to the runoff are reasonable.Figure 5
Precipitation and simulated daily hydrographs at water quality monitoring stations.


## 3.2.2. Water Quality Simulation

The model parameters related to the TN and TP are calibrated and validated by using the data measured in Xiyangsi section and Yanjiaxiang section. The data for calibration are monthly measured from September 2010 to August 2011 and the data for validation are monthly measured data from September 2011 to April 2012. The calibration and validation results show that all Nash efficiency coefficients are above 50%, of which the Nash efficiency coefficient in Yanjiaxiang section is 67.24% (Table3). By comparing the simulated and measured curve, it is obvious that this model can offer reasonable simulations of actual water quality, but it shows some gaps in the peak value in the curve between the simulated and measured data due to the relatively low accuracy of simulation at some node points (Figures 6 and 7). Overall, the calibrated model is comparatively efficient for simulating the process of nonpoint resources pollution.Table 3
The evaluation of calibration and validation of the model.
Period
Section
Pollutants
The efficiency of Nash (%)
Calibration
Yanjiaxiang
TN
67.24
TP
52.31
Xiyangsi
TN
59.05
TP
53.12
Validation
Yanjiaxiang
TN
55.64
TP
53.07
Xiyangsi
TN
57.3
TP
54.2Figure 6
Observed and simulated TN and TP at Yanjiaxiang or Xiyangsi (monthly calibration period).Figure 7
Observed and simulated TN and TP at Yanjiaxiang or Xiyangsi (monthly validation period).The NPS pollutions in the Longtan River and Hongxi River were simulated from 2010 to 2012 by using calibrated model. The simulated annual fluxes of these two sections are shown in Table4, which indicates a growing trend about the TN and TP from 2010 to 2012. In 2012, the total flux of TN in two sections is 642.55 t, of which the flux of TN amounts to 362.58 t in Hongxi River section and 279.98 t in Longtan River section. And the fluxes of TP in two sections amount to 50.7 t, of which the flux of TP in Hongxi River section and Longtan River section is 33.62 t and 17.08 t, respectively. It indicates that the flux of pollution in Hongxi River is more than that in Longtan River and this phenomenon is highly related to the area of basin, population distribution, industrial structure, and other factors. The area of Hongxi River basin and Longtan River basin is 289.86 km2 and 189.73 km2.Table 4
The simulated results of pollutant loads in TN and TP.
Year
Index
2010
2011
2012
Longtan River
Average flow (unit: m3/s)
0.7
3.08
4.94
TN (unit: ton)
79.13
199.21
279.98
TP (unit:  ton)
7.73
16.69
17.08
Hongxi River
Average flow (Unit: m3/s)
0.96
3.98
6.32
TN (unit: ton)
146.24
269.2
362.58
TP (unit: ton)
11.05
26.13
33.62
Total
TN (unit: ton)
225.37
468.41
642.55
TP (unit: ton)
18.78
42.82
50.7The ECM and BTOPMC were, respectively, adopted to calculate pollutant loads in Xichong River in 2012. The comparisons of results of the two models are listed in Table5. The statistical results by the ECM are the yearly input amount of pollutants and the simulated results by BTOPMC are the fluxes of pollutants in two sections. The differences between the outputs of the two models can reflect the self-purification capacity of the river. The simulated results indicate that the differences of TN and TP in Hongxi River sections are 167.73 t and 6.87 t, respectively, while those in Longtan River are 58.21 t and 7.51 t, respectively, which reflect that the self-purification capacity of the Hongxi River is higher than that of Longtan River. According to the runoff data, the yearly average runoff in Hongxi River and Longtan River is 6.32 m3/s and 4.94 m3/s, respectively. The yearly average runoff in Hongxi River is larger than that in Longtan River which also reflects that the self-purification capacity of the Hongxi River is higher than that of Longtan River. In summary, considering self-purification capacity of rivers and a reliable calibration of the BTOPMC against the observed TN and TP concentrations in the two water quality monitoring sites, results of statistical analysis and mechanistic model simulation are mostly identical and reasonable.Table 5
The comparison of loads in TP and TN between the ECM and BTOPMC model  (unit: ton).
Pollutants
Data source
Hongxi River
Longtan River
TN
ECM
530.31
338.19
BTOPMC
362.58
279.98
Difference
167.73
58.21
TP
ECM
40.49
24.59
BTOPMC
33.62
17.08
Difference
6.87
7.51
Note: the statistical results by ECM are expressed as the amount of pollutants which are input to the river in 2012. The results by BTOPMC are expressed as the yearly fluxes of pollutants in sections in 2012. The amount of difference between these two results reflects the environmental capacity and self-purification capacity of rivers.


## 4. Conclusions

Due to easy acquisition of initial input data, an easy and practical assessment method on NPS pollution can be built by combining the ECM with the BTOPMC. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) based on the literature survey in the study area, the field data was adopted to confirm the export coefficients of the ECM, the loads of TN and TP were statistically analyzed, and the main pollutant sources were identified in 2012. The quantity of TN and TP estimated by the ECM was 868.5 t and 65.08 t; (2) based on hydrological similarity, runoff data from nearby gauged sites were pooled to compensate for the lack of at-site data; thus, the water quality submodel of distributed hydrological model can be developed to simulate the monthly fluxes of TN and TP in the two sections (Yanjiaxiang section and Xiyangsi section) from 2010 to 2012, and the quantity of TN and TP in 2012 simulated by the BTOPMC was 642.56 t and 50.70 t, respectively. Under the consideration of self-purification capacity of river, the results of these two models in 2012 were both reasonable and mostly identical; (3) based on an overall analysis of conditions counting in all factors, agricultural fertilizer, rural sewage, and livestock and poultry sewage are the main pollution sources influencing loads of TN and TP in study area and should be controlled first; (4) considering the data shortage in developing countries, the method adopted in this paper can require minimal input data and is especially effective for NPS pollution loads estimation and pollution sources identification in the small-scale and data-sparse watersheds or regions.



---

*Source: 519671-2015-09-29.xml*