# Pricing of Margin Call Stock Loan Based on the FMLS

Authors: Kaili Xiang; Peng Hu; Xiao Li
Journal: Mathematical Problems in Engineering
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

In common stock loan, lenders face the risk that their loans will not be repaid if the stock price falls below loan, which limits the issuance and circulation of stock loans. The empirical test suggests that the log-return series of stock price in the US market reject the normal distribution and admit instead a subclass of the asymmetric distribution. In this paper, we investigate the model of the margin call stock loan problem under the assumption that the return of stock follows the finite moment log-stable process (FMLS). In this case, the pricing model of the margin call stock loan can be described by a space-fractional partial differential equation with a time-varying free boundary condition. We transform the free boundary problem to a linear complementarity problem, and the fully-implicit finite difference method that we used is unconditionally stable in both the integer and fractional order. The numerical experiments are carried out to demonstrate differences of the margin call stock loan model under the FMLS and the standard normal distribution. Last, we analyze the impact of key parameters in our model on the margin call stock loan evaluation and give some reasonable explanation.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Stock loan is a contract that the holders of securities take these securities as collateral to obtain loans from commercial banks. Xia et al. [1] quantified the stock loan, established the mathematical model of the stock loan with infinite maturity by assuming that the logarithm price of risk assets obeys geometric Brownian motion, and opened the door of research on the pricing of the stock loan.The common stock loan does not have any restrictions on the borrower. When the total price of the stock runs below the loan, the rational borrower will default and the lender will bear the loss, which brings the risk to the lender and reduces the supply and circulation of the stock loan. In order to control the risk, Liang et al. [2] studied the infinite maturity stock loan with automatic termination clause, limit, and additional margin. They found that the unlimited stock loan would make the lender unable to obtain the maximum interest income, and the borrower could not borrow enough funds when he pledged the assets, so that the allocation efficiency of funds could not be maximized. Grasselli and Gómez [3] studied the trading restrictions on the stock holders in the incomplete market. According to the utility function of the fund borrower, the limited maturity stock loan is priced, and the limited maturity stock loan is priced according to the variational inequality. Wong [4] studied the optimal stop time problem of the infinite maturity stock loan similar to a permanent American option driven by the index Levy process and uses variational inequality to solve the problem. Cai and Sun [5] studied the infinite maturity and limited maturity stock loan models under the super index jump diffusion model. The accuracy of the solution is proved by numerical examples. Wong et al. [6] studied the case that stock volatility is a stochastic process. When the interest rate is negative, the optimal stop time of an American call option is considered.Through the research and empirical test, scholars found that the classical B–S framework does not conform to the actual situation, and the logarithmic distribution of risk asset prices often has a “peak thick tail” phenomenon, which is consistent with the fact that the stock price is an autocorrelation process. Carr et al. [7] studied the volatility smile of asset prices through empirical research and found that the FMLS process model can better describe asset price changes. As a special Levy process, the FMLS process can well reflect the large jump of risk asset price and the situation that the logarithm distribution of risk asset price is often biased. In the framework of FMLS, the α steady-state process is used as the driving process to describe the autocorrelation of asset price changes and ensure the stability. When α < 2, the FMLS model is in good agreement with the phenomenon that the logarithm distribution of risk asset prices has thick tail. Because of its good properties, finite moment log steady state processes are more and more used to simulate asset price movement. Yu et al. [8] derived the equations and the boundary conditions satisfied by the Gerber–Shiu function, the expected discounted capital injection function and the expected discounted dividend function by assuming that the observation interval and claim amount are exponentially distributed, respectively. Yu et al. [9] considered a class of social optimal mean field control problem of the population growth model. Zhang et al. [10] focused on valuation of the products with guaranteed minimum death benefit (GMDB). The benefit amount is linked to the performance of the underlying asset, which is modeled by an exponential Levy process. Yu et al. [11] used the Fourier cosine series expansion (COS) method to value the guaranteed minimum death benefit (GMDB) products. Peng et al. [12] modeled the insurance company’s surplus flow by a perturbed compound Poisson model.Under the finite moment log-stable (FMLS) model, the partial differential equation of option pricing is not easy to get because of a fractional operator. Cartea [13] first gave the proper partial differential equation of European option pricing under the framework of FMLS by the Fourier transform. Chen et al. [14] gave the analytical solution of European option under the framework of FMLS through the Fourier integral transform on the basis of Cartea, and they studied the numerical solution of an American call option pricing under the framework of FMLS through the prediction correction method [15], in which the moving boundary problem was transformed into the fixed boundary problem through coordinate transformation. Zhang et al. [16] studied the numerical solution of European double barrier options driven by the Levy process, including FMLS, using the second-order implicit difference scheme. Chen [17] studied the second-order finite difference scheme and obtained the numerical solution of the American option in the form of penalty function.Based on the previous research, we found that under the framework of FMLS, nobody studied the margin call stock loan. In the actual economic activities, the demand for the margin stock loan is increasing constantly.The rest of this paper is arranged as follows. In the Section2, we establish the mathematical model of the stock loan with margin call, transform the moving boundary problem into the fixed boundary problem through coordinate transformation, and finally transform it into the linear complementarity problem. In Section 3, we obtain the numerical solution of the linear complementarity problem by the finite difference method. In the Section 4, the validity of the numerical solution and the parameter analysis are verified by numerical examples. Finally, we draw the conclusion in the Section 5.


## 2. Pricing Model

The margin call stock loan: the borrower pledged stockS and got loan K from lender. The borrower can choose to repay the loan at any time. However, the borrower needs to pay a certain amount of interest while paying the loan K, so the borrower chooses the repayment amount at time t as Keγt when St<Keγt; rational people will not repay, and his payment at time t is St−Keγt+. In order to control the risk, the margin call stock loan has set a lower bound SB; when the stock price St at t moment runs below SB (generally SB=Keγt), the lender have the right to require the borrower to recover the funds of ΔKeγtq, where Δ is the share to be recovered, and then, the remaining loan is 1−ΔKeγt. After the payment is made, the margin call stock loan becomes a nonrecourse stock loan with a maturity of T−t; therefore, the value of the stock loan after recovery is Rt=VxB,0;1−ΔKeγt−ΔKeγt, where Vis the value of the nonrecourse stock loan with a maturity of T−tq and strike price of 1−ΔKeγt.The margin call stock loan stipulates a lower bound of the stock price. When the stock price reaches the lower bound, the stock loan is suspended, and the lender has the right to require the borrower to recover part of the loan. After the borrower recovers the loan, the stock loan with recourse is converted into a stock loan without recourse until the maturity date.In conclusion, there are two stages in the margin call stock loan: the stage with recourse and the stage without recourse. This is similar to an American call option with a change barrier in the first stage and an American call option with a change strike price in the second stage, as shown in Figure1.Figure 1
Two stages of the margin call stock loan.The value of the margin call stock loan isVmc(margin call [18]), where V is the nonrecourse stock loan. Let xt=lnSt, and under the risk neutral measure, the stock price under the framework of FMLS obeys the following stochastic differential equation:(1)dxt=r−D−adt+σdLtFMLS,where r is the risk-free interest rate, D is the continuous dividend rate of stock, σ is volatility, dLtFMLS is the α-steady state stochastic process, dLtFMLS∼Lα0,dt1/α,−1, a is the convex adjustment, and a=−σαsecαπ/2. According to the above assumptions, the partial differential equation and boundary conditions of the pricing of the margin call stock loan can be obtained as(2)∂Vmcx,t∂t=rVmcx,t−r−D−a∂Vmcx,t∂x−a−∞DxαVmcx,t.Boundary condition 1: terminal condition.(3)Vmcx,T=exT−KeγT+.Boundary condition 2: whenSt=SB=Keγt, i.e., xt=xB, the borrower needs to recover ΔKeγt, where Vis the nonrecourse stock loan with the execution price of 1−ΔKeγt and the maturity date of T−tB. So,(4)Rt=Vmcx,t=Vx,0;1−ΔKeγt,T−tB−ΔKeγt.In order to reduce the error of fractional order numerical calculation, take(5)Rx,t=Vmcx,t=Vx,0;1−ΔKeγt,T−tB−ΔKeγt,x∈−∞,xB.WhenΔ=0, the margin call stock loan becomes a stock loan without recourse.Boundary condition 3: when the stock price approaches the free boundary,(6)Vmcxf,t=exf−Keγt+.Boundary condition 4: when the stock price approaches the free boundary, it should be kept smooth.(7)∂Vmcxf,t∂x=exf.In conclusion, the partial differential equations and boundary conditions of the nonrecourse stock loan pricing with variable strike price under the framework of FMLS are as follows:(8)∂Vmcx,t∂t=rVmcx,t−r−D−a∂Vmcx,t∂x−a−∞DxαVmcx,t,x∈−∞,xf,t∈0,T,1<α<2,Vmcx,t=Rx,t,x∈−∞,xB,Vmcx,T=exT−KeγT+,∂Vmcxf,t∂x=exf.Coordinate transformation for (8)(9)yt=xt−γt,τ=T−t,V¯y,τ=e−αtVx,t.The final value problem with moving boundary is transformed into the initial boundary value problem with a fixed boundary.First, the coordinate transformation of the fractional order operator is(10)Dxα−∞Vmcx,t=1Γn−αdndxtn∫−∞xtVmcz,txt−zα−n+1dz=1Γn−αdndxtn∫−∞xteαtV¯mcy,τxt−zα−n+1dz=eαtΓn−αdndyt+γtn∫−∞xV¯mcy,τyt+γt−zα−n+1dz=eαtΓn−αdndytn∫−∞ytV¯mcy,τyt−zα−n+1dz,(11)∂V¯mcy,τ∂τ=r−γ−D−a∂V¯mcy,τ∂y+a−∞DyαV¯mcy,τ−r−γV¯mcy,τ,y∈−∞,yf,τ∈0,T,1<α<2,V¯mcy,0=ey0−K+,V¯mcy,τ=V¯y,τ;1−ΔK,τ−ΔK,y∈−∞,yB,V¯mcyf,τ=eyf−K+,∂V¯mcyf,τ∂y=eyf.Next, we transform (11) from the free boundary problem into a linear complementarity problem:(12)min∂V¯mc∂τ−LyV¯mc,V¯mc−ey−K+=0,y∈R,τ∈0,T,V¯mcy,0=ey0−K+,y>yB,V¯mcy,τ=V¯y,τ;1−ΔK,τ−ΔK,y∈−∞,yB,τ∈0,T,where(13)LyV¯mc=r−γ−D−a∂V¯mcy,τ∂y+a−∞DyαV¯mcy,τ−r−γV¯mcy,τ.So far, we derive the partial differential equations and boundary conditions for pricing contracts with recourse under the framework of FMLS, where the lower boundary is relatively special due to the limitation of recourse. Then, the final value problem with variable boundary is transformed into the initial value problem with fixed boundary by coordinate transformation. Finally, the free boundary problem is transformed into a linear complementarity problem, and a simpler and more convenient linear complementarity problem is obtained. In the next section, we will use the finite difference scheme to give the numerical solution of equation (12).


## 3. Numerical Format of the Model

Before numerical calculation, it is necessary to establish grid and approximate PDE. First, we divide the domain. SupposeyB is the ordinate corresponding to the barrier price. Let 0≤τ=nΔτ≤T,n=0,1,…,N;L≤y≤R,Δy=R−yB/M,ym=L+iΔy, m=0,1,…,M; and V¯mcn≈V¯mcym,τn,α, and yB=L+bΔy is the ordinate corresponding to the margin call boundary.The initial value and boundary conditions are as follows.Initial value condition:(14)V¯mcm0=eym−K+,m=b,1,…,M.Boundary condition 1:(15)V¯mcmn=V¯ym,τn;1−ΔK,τn−ΔK,n=0,1,…,N,m=0,1,…,b.Boundary condition 2:(16)V¯mcMn=eym−K,n=0,1,…,N.We use the central difference scheme to approximate the first-order time and space partial derivatives:(17)∂V¯mcym,τn∂τ=V¯mcmn+1−V¯mcmnΔτ+OΔτ,∂V¯mcym,τn∂y=V¯mcm+1n+1−V¯m−1n+12Δy+OΔy2.We use the modified Grunwald–Letnikov formula to approximate the space-fractional derivative [19]:(18)Dyα−∞V¯mcym,τn=1Δyα∑k=0m+1wkαV¯mcm−k+1n+1+OΔy2,where(19)wkα=−1kαk=−1kΓα+1Γk+1Γα−k+1=αα−1⋯α−k+1k!,is called the Grunwald–Letnikov coefficient. In numerical calculation, in order to save memory, the iterative algorithm is generally used to calculate wkα. From the above formula, we found that the fractional derivative is related to all the values before m+1, which means the fractional derivative is a nonlocal operator, which can well explain that the underlying asset price movement is related to the previous historical price.We get the implicit difference scheme of equation (11) based on the modified Grunwald–Letnikov formula approximation:(20)V¯mcmn+1−V¯mcmnΔτ=12r−γ−D−aV¯mcm+1n+1−V¯mcm−1n+12Δy+V¯mcm+1n+1−Vmcm−1n+12Δy+12a1Δyα∑k=0m+1wkαV¯mcm−k+1n+1+1Δyα∑k=0m+1wkαV¯mcm−k+1n+1−12r−γV¯mcmn+1+Vmcmn.In reference [19], the scheme has been proved to be unconditionally stable. Equation (20) is sorted out as follows:(21)−h1∑k=3m+1wkαV¯mcm−k+1n+1+h2−h1w2αV¯mcm−1n+1+1−h1w1α+h3V¯mcmn+1−h1w0α+h2V¯mcm+1n+1=h1∑k=3m+1wkαV¯mcm−k+1n+h1w2α−h2V¯mcm−1n+1+h1w1α−h3V¯mcmn+h1w0α+h2V¯mcm+1n,where(22)h1=12aΔτΔyα,h2=14r−γ−D−aΔτΔy,h3=12r−γΔτ.Write (21) in matrix:(23)AV¯mcn+1=BV¯mcn,where(24)A=1−h1w1α+h3−h1w0α+h20⋯00h2−h1w2α1−h1w1α+h3−h1w0α+h2⋯00−h1w3αh2−h1w2α1−h1w1α+h3⋯00⋮⋮⋮⋱⋮⋮−h1wMα−h1wM−1α−h1wM−2α⋯1−h1w1α+h3−h1w0α+h2−h1wM+1α−h1wMα−h1wM−1α⋯h2−h1w2α1−h1w1α+h3,B=1+h1w1α−h3h1w0α+h20⋯00h1w2α−h21+h1w1α−h3h1w0α+h2⋯00h1w3αh1w2α−h21+h1w1α−h3⋯00⋮⋮⋮⋱⋮⋮h1wMαh1wM−1αh1wM−2α⋯1+h1w1α−h3h1w0α+h2h1wM+1αh1wMαh1wM−1α⋯h1w2α−h21+h1w1α−h3,V¯mcn+1=V¯0n+1,V¯1n+1,V¯2n+1,…,V¯Mn+1,V¯mcn=V¯0n,V¯1n,V¯2n,…,V¯Mn.SinceBV¯mcn is known in numerical calculation, we can make qn=BV¯mcn, that is, AV¯mcn+1=qn. It can be obtained by Gauss elimination Aqn⟶A′qn′, where A′qn′ is the simplest step matrix, so we get(25)V¯mcmn+1=qmn′Am,m′,m=M,V¯mcmn+1=qmn′−Am,m+1′V¯m+1n+1Am,m′,m=M−1,M−2,…,b.Formula (12) and the stock loan have their own characteristics. Formula (20), (21), and (25) are equivalent, and they are only established in area m=0,1,…,mf, where mf is the point corresponding to the asset price closest to the free boundary. Obviously, mf is a positive integer less than M. Due to the fact that the stock loan can be repaid at any time, obviously V¯mn+1 should be greater than or equal to eyf−K+. Therefore, the value of the stock loan on each approximation grid point should be expressed as(26)V¯mcmn+1=maxqmn′−Am,m+1′V¯m+1n+1Am,m′,eyf−K,0,m=M−1,M−2,…,0,V¯mcmn+1=maxqmn′Am,m′,eym−K,0,m=M.According to the conclusion of reference [20], backward calculation V¯mcmn+1 in (26), it will be more accurate to calculate the value of the stock loan from M. Because backward calculation defaults V¯mcmn+1=eym−K+ when m≥mf. When m<mf, the value of stock loan is determined by partial differential equation (11).


## 4. Numerical Example

### 4.1. Model Validation

Generally, the pledge rate of the stock loan is less than 0.6. We set the parameters of stock loans with recourse as follows: initial stock priceS0=100, loan K=60, expiration date T=3, risk free interest rate r=0.05, dividend rate D=0.1, volatility γ=0.1, tail index α=1.5, and recovery factor Δ=0.4, and let Smax=150, SB=Keγt. Due to yt=lnSt−γt, St=eyt+γt, corresponding ymax=5 and yB=4.094. If St is used as the boundary, it will cause the boundary moving, so we use the final result V¯mc of model (11) as the inverse coordinate transformation to get V, Vmcx,t=eαT−tV¯mcy,τ, and eαT−τ is always bigger than 1.Figure2 shows that the margin call stock loan is cut off at the barrier price yB. It can be seen from the lower boundary, the longer the maturity, the greater the value of the nonrecourse stock loan, and the greater the value of barrier yB, the higher the corresponding function image. Under the price of yB, the margin call stock loan is transformed into a stock loan without recourse. In this paper, we mainly discuss the nature of the margin call stock loan through numerical experiments.Figure 2
The value ofV¯mc.Figure3 shows that when the pledge rate Δ=0, margin call stock loans equals no recourse stock loans.Figure 3
WhenΔ=0, Vmc coincides with V.


### 4.2. Parameter Analysis

The risk of the margin call stock loan is more controllable for the lender, so the lender is more willing to improve the pledge rate to borrow more money and obtain more interest. With the increase of pledge rate, the borrower also gets more funds in the controllable range, which improves the allocation efficiency of funds.Figure4 shows the impact of different recourse shares ∆ on the value of the margin call stock loan. The right side of the barrier indicates the contract value of the margin call stock loan. The left side of the obstacle is Vx,0;1−ΔK,T−ΔK, which means, the value of the nonrecourse stock loan with a maturity of T and loan amount of 1−ΔK minus the value of recourse currency at time 0. Figure shows that the lower the share of recourse, the higher the contract value of the stock pledge loan with recourse, which is confirmed by the actual economic activities. And from formula (4), no matter how high the recourse share ∆ is, the contract value of the margin call stock loan is always bigger than zero at the obstacle.Figure 4
Effect of different recourse sharesΔ on Vmc.Figure5 shows the effect of different loan interest rates γ on the contract value of the margin call stock loan under the condition that other parameters remain unchanged. We found that the higher the loan interest rate γ is, the lower the contract value of the margin call stock loan is because in practice, the higher the loan interest rate is, the higher the interest the borrower needs to pay and the faster the barrier price will rise, so the corresponding contract value of the margin call stock loan will be lower.Figure 5
Effect of different loan interest ratesγ on Vmc.Figure6 shows the effect of different maturity dates T on the contract value of the margin call stock loan under the condition that other parameters remain unchanged. This is because in the actual economic activities, on the one hand, due to the existence of volatility, the longer the time is, the higher the stock price is likely to reach; on the other hand, the loan interest rate and dividend rate are greater than the risk-free interest rate, so the longer the time is, the greater the risk the fund lender bears. In conclusion, the longer the maturity T is, the higher the value of the margin call stock loan is.Figure 6
Effect of different maturity datesT on Vmc.Figure7 shows the effect of different volatility σ on the margin call stock loan under the condition that other parameters are unchanged. It can be seen from the figure that the margin call stock loan increases with the volatility σ because the nonrecourse stock loan is similar to an American option. Due to the increase in the value of the American option with the increase of volatility σ, the increase of volatility σ will give a higher initial value to the recourse stock loan. On the other hand, the margin call stock loan is similar to an American barrier option, and the larger the volatility σ, the higher the value of the margin call stock loan.Figure 7
Effect of different volatilityσ on Vmc.Figure8 shows the effect of different risk-free interest rates r on the contract value of the margin call stock loan under the condition that other parameters remain unchanged. The figure shows that the value of the margin call stock loan increases with the increase of the risk-free interest rate r. Which means the higher the risk-free interest rate is, the higher the contract value of the margin call stock loan is.Figure 8
Effect of different risk-free interest ratesr on Vmc.Because the risk of the margin call stock loan is more controllable for the lender, in order to obtain more interest income, the lender is willing to increase the pledge rate, which means to provide more loans. Figure9 shows the effect of different loan amounts K on the contract value of the margin call stock loan. Because the higher the loan amount is, the easier the stock price is to reach the lower bound, the lower the contract value of the corresponding margin call stock loan is.Figure 9
Effect of different loan amountsK on Vmc.


## 4.1. Model Validation

Generally, the pledge rate of the stock loan is less than 0.6. We set the parameters of stock loans with recourse as follows: initial stock priceS0=100, loan K=60, expiration date T=3, risk free interest rate r=0.05, dividend rate D=0.1, volatility γ=0.1, tail index α=1.5, and recovery factor Δ=0.4, and let Smax=150, SB=Keγt. Due to yt=lnSt−γt, St=eyt+γt, corresponding ymax=5 and yB=4.094. If St is used as the boundary, it will cause the boundary moving, so we use the final result V¯mc of model (11) as the inverse coordinate transformation to get V, Vmcx,t=eαT−tV¯mcy,τ, and eαT−τ is always bigger than 1.Figure2 shows that the margin call stock loan is cut off at the barrier price yB. It can be seen from the lower boundary, the longer the maturity, the greater the value of the nonrecourse stock loan, and the greater the value of barrier yB, the higher the corresponding function image. Under the price of yB, the margin call stock loan is transformed into a stock loan without recourse. In this paper, we mainly discuss the nature of the margin call stock loan through numerical experiments.Figure 2
The value ofV¯mc.Figure3 shows that when the pledge rate Δ=0, margin call stock loans equals no recourse stock loans.Figure 3
WhenΔ=0, Vmc coincides with V.


## 4.2. Parameter Analysis

The risk of the margin call stock loan is more controllable for the lender, so the lender is more willing to improve the pledge rate to borrow more money and obtain more interest. With the increase of pledge rate, the borrower also gets more funds in the controllable range, which improves the allocation efficiency of funds.Figure4 shows the impact of different recourse shares ∆ on the value of the margin call stock loan. The right side of the barrier indicates the contract value of the margin call stock loan. The left side of the obstacle is Vx,0;1−ΔK,T−ΔK, which means, the value of the nonrecourse stock loan with a maturity of T and loan amount of 1−ΔK minus the value of recourse currency at time 0. Figure shows that the lower the share of recourse, the higher the contract value of the stock pledge loan with recourse, which is confirmed by the actual economic activities. And from formula (4), no matter how high the recourse share ∆ is, the contract value of the margin call stock loan is always bigger than zero at the obstacle.Figure 4
Effect of different recourse sharesΔ on Vmc.Figure5 shows the effect of different loan interest rates γ on the contract value of the margin call stock loan under the condition that other parameters remain unchanged. We found that the higher the loan interest rate γ is, the lower the contract value of the margin call stock loan is because in practice, the higher the loan interest rate is, the higher the interest the borrower needs to pay and the faster the barrier price will rise, so the corresponding contract value of the margin call stock loan will be lower.Figure 5
Effect of different loan interest ratesγ on Vmc.Figure6 shows the effect of different maturity dates T on the contract value of the margin call stock loan under the condition that other parameters remain unchanged. This is because in the actual economic activities, on the one hand, due to the existence of volatility, the longer the time is, the higher the stock price is likely to reach; on the other hand, the loan interest rate and dividend rate are greater than the risk-free interest rate, so the longer the time is, the greater the risk the fund lender bears. In conclusion, the longer the maturity T is, the higher the value of the margin call stock loan is.Figure 6
Effect of different maturity datesT on Vmc.Figure7 shows the effect of different volatility σ on the margin call stock loan under the condition that other parameters are unchanged. It can be seen from the figure that the margin call stock loan increases with the volatility σ because the nonrecourse stock loan is similar to an American option. Due to the increase in the value of the American option with the increase of volatility σ, the increase of volatility σ will give a higher initial value to the recourse stock loan. On the other hand, the margin call stock loan is similar to an American barrier option, and the larger the volatility σ, the higher the value of the margin call stock loan.Figure 7
Effect of different volatilityσ on Vmc.Figure8 shows the effect of different risk-free interest rates r on the contract value of the margin call stock loan under the condition that other parameters remain unchanged. The figure shows that the value of the margin call stock loan increases with the increase of the risk-free interest rate r. Which means the higher the risk-free interest rate is, the higher the contract value of the margin call stock loan is.Figure 8
Effect of different risk-free interest ratesr on Vmc.Because the risk of the margin call stock loan is more controllable for the lender, in order to obtain more interest income, the lender is willing to increase the pledge rate, which means to provide more loans. Figure9 shows the effect of different loan amounts K on the contract value of the margin call stock loan. Because the higher the loan amount is, the easier the stock price is to reach the lower bound, the lower the contract value of the corresponding margin call stock loan is.Figure 9
Effect of different loan amountsK on Vmc.


## 5. Conclusion

In this paper, we analyze the pricing process of the margin call stock loan under the framework of FMLS. We take the value of the nonrecourse stock loan as a boundary condition of the barrier of the recourse stock loan and study the pricing of the recourse stock loan. The partial differential equations and boundary conditions for the pricing of the margin call stock loan are obtained, and then, the unconditionally stable numerical scheme for the linear complementarity problem is given. And through numerical experiments, we verify the nature of the margin call stock loan, especially when the recourse shareΔ=0, and the margin call stock loan is equivalent to the stock loan without recourse. Finally, we give the influence of different parameters on the stock loan with recourse through numerical experiments, especially the influence of different recourse shares Δ, which are unique to the stock loan with recourse, and explain the economic significance behind it.



---

*Source: 5349345-2020-06-27.xml*