# Analysis on Value of Continuous Nursing Based on WeChat in Improving Healthy Quality of Life and Self-Management Behavior of Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy

Authors: Liu Li; Haiyan Chen; Can Peng; Li Yang
Journal: Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

Objective. To explore the value of continuous nursing (CN) based on WeChat in improving healthy quality of life and self-management behavior of patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN). Methods. A total of 100 patients with DN who were treated in our hospital from November 2019 to January 2020 were selected. Thereinto, 54 patients who received CN based on WeChat were considered as the research group, and 46 patients who received the routine nursing intervention were considered as the control group. Peripheral blood samples were collected before nursing intervention (T0), 1 month after intervention (T1), and 2 months after intervention (T2) to test blood glucose, blood lipid, and renal function. Exercise of self-care agency (ESCA) scale and general self-efficacy scale (GSES) was conducted to evaluate patients’ self-management ability, and a short-form 36-item health survey (SF-36) was conducted to evaluate their quality of life. Finally, the treatment compliance and satisfaction of patients were investigated. Results. There was no marked difference in blood glucose, blood lipid, and renal function between groups at T0 (P>0.05), but the research group was better than the control group at T1 and T2 (P<0.05). After the nursing intervention, the scores of ESCA, GSES, and SF-36 in the research group were higher (P<0.05). In addition, the treatment compliance rate and satisfaction of the research group were also higher. Conclusion. CN based on WeChat can effectively improve the self-management behavior and quality of life of DN patients, which is extremely suitable for such chronic diseases with extremely long treatment cycles and can provide a more effective guarantee for their recovery.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Diabetes is a kind of metabolic disease characterized by a chronic increase in blood glucose levels, and its prevalence and incidence are now increasing rapidly worldwide. It has developed into the most common kind of chronic disease [1]. With the improvement of people’s living standards and changing lifestyles, the age of onset of diabetes is getting younger [2]. Typical clinical manifestations of diabetes are polydipsia, polyuria, polyphagia, and weight loss, which can lead to multisystem damage as the course of the disease increases and is an important risk factor for the development of many major diseases such as cardiovascular disease and heart failure [3]. At present, there is no complete cure for diabetes in a clinic, and the main intervention method is to realize maintenance hypoglycemia treatment through long-term medication [4]. Diabetes itself is not more harmful, but it is highly susceptible to a series of complications that pose a serious threat to the safety of patients who are ill [5]. For example, diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a common chronic microvascular complication of diabetes with the main clinical manifestations of proteinuria, decreased glomerular filtration rate, increased blood pressure, and renal failure [6]. The current clinical treatment for DN is blood pressure and glucose control, lipid reduction, a low-protein diet, etc. Because its treatment needs to be long-term, patient compliance and self-management ability have a close and important correlation with prognosis [7].Continuous nursing (CN) is a new and comprehensive approach clinically, the core of which is to provide a continuum of care, quality assurance, and therapeutic services to patients, addressing the health problems and needs they face in their lives through interventions in their daily lives and behavioral habits [8]. Therefore, CN is an essential factor in improving the long-term prognosis of DN patients. With the rapid development of the information age, the Internet has become an important part of clinical treatment, in addition to assisting doctors to manage and analyze patients’ condition information; it can also be used as a bridge to spread information between doctors and patients. In China, WeChat is the most important communication tool with the significant advantages of efficiency, convenience, and timeliness. Based on these characteristics, WeChat is very helpful for doctors to understand the details of patients’ life in real time, so as to achieve timely medical help [9]. Thus, we will analyze the value of CN based on WeChat to DN patients’ healthy life quality and self-management behavior, in order to provide effective reference and guidance for DN patients’ nursing treatment and promote the formation of a more scientific nursing service system.


## 2. Data and Methods

### 2.1. Research Data

A total of 100 patients with DN who were treated in our hospital from November 2019 to January 2020 were selected. Thereinto, 54 patients who received CN based on WeChat were considered as the research group, and 46 patients who received the routine nursing intervention were considered as the control group.


### 2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patient has a history of type 2 diabetes and is diagnosed as DN [10]; (2) age > 18; (3) patients can communicate with others normally; (4) the information is complete; (5) Mogensen staging belongs to stage I or II; (6) know the operation of WeChat and use WeChat as the main online chat tool. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with abnormal function of the heart, liver, and kidney; (2) patients with other chronic diseases; (3) those who suffer from hematological and immune diseases; (4) those who cannot receive complete treatment for various reasons.


### 2.3. Methods

#### 2.3.1. Routine Nursing Intervention

Patients were given basic health guidance after admission, and routine checkups, and medical and nursing staff followed medical advice to assist patients in treatment. Before discharge, patients were informed of the need for caution and follow-up visits after discharge and biweekly telephone follow-up visits were made to understand patients’ conditions, addressing rehabilitation problems encountered by patients, and give them some psychological guidance.


#### 2.3.2. CN Based on WeChat

Firstly, a nursing team was established within the department including attending physicians, head nurses, and experienced nurses. A WeChat group was set up to learn about DN-related knowledge, review past data, summarize the experience and establish a complete intervention plan. CN based on WeChat was then carried out. After that, we assessed patients’ needs based on physical information and develop a plan of care accordingly. Through diet management, medication management, exercise management, emotional management, and other general directions combined with each patient’s situation into a graphic form sent to the WeChat group, to facilitate the daily self-management of patients, family members can also play a supervisory role based on guidance, and to inform the prevention and treatment of common problems, so that patients and family members can face the unexpected situation can be timely response to reduce the risk. WeChat groups were used to pass on treatment cases of previous patients, antidisease tips, etc., to form a correct and positive attitude towards cooperating with treatment, and to provide support and encouragement. We interact with patients through WeChat and other online platforms to eliminate their anxiety and address their actual needs and implement a combination of phased family self-management and regular follow-ups to help patients recover their health in a more comprehensive, rigorous, and efficient manner.Both groups were intervened continuously for 2 months.


### 2.4. Sample Collection and Detection

The related indexes of patients were detected before nursing intervention (T0), one month after intervention (T1), and two months after intervention (T2). Peripheral blood was drawn in a procoagulant tube and sent to the laboratory department of our hospital for routine examination of blood glucose, lipids, and renal function.


### 2.5. Outcome Measures

Blood glucose function: Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (2 h PG). Blood lipid function: Triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C). Renal function: Serum creatinine (Scr), cystatin C (CysC), blood urea nitrogen (BUN). Self-management ability: The out-of-hospital self-care ability was evaluated by the exercise of the self-care agency (ESCA) scale [11], including four items self-concept, self-care responsibility, health knowledge awareness, and self-care skills, with lower scores indicating poorer self-care ability. The self-efficacy before and after care was assessed via the general self-efficacy scale (GSES) [12], with lower scores indicating poorer self-efficacy. Treatment compliance are as follows: Excellent: Patients follow the medical advice, take medication on time, pay attention to diet, hygiene, etc.; Good: Patients basically follow the doctor’s prescription, but the diet was not controlled properly. General: Patients occasionally follow the doctor’s advice and do not pay attention to diet and hygiene. Poor: Patients don’t follow the doctor’s advice. Compliance rate = (excellent + good)/total × 100%. Quality of life: The quality of life was assessed using the short-form 36-item health survey (SF-36) [13], including 8 dimensions (emotional function, social function, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health, physical function, physical role, with a total score of 100 for each dimension, and higher scores indicating better quality of life). Nursing satisfaction: Nursing satisfaction was assessed via the self-made nursing satisfaction scale [14]: Including 22 items, with a total score of 110. 22–43 were very dissatisfied, 44–65 were dissatisfied, 66–87 were average, 88–109 were satisfied and 110 were very satisfied; satisfaction = (very satisfied + satisfied)/total × 100%.


### 2.6. Statistical Method

The data were processed via SPSS23.0. The counting data were expressed as (%) and compared through a chi-square test. The measurement data were represented as (X¯±s), and the statistical analysis includes independent sample t-test, paired t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and LSD post-test. P<0.05 was considered that the difference was statistically marked.


## 2.1. Research Data

A total of 100 patients with DN who were treated in our hospital from November 2019 to January 2020 were selected. Thereinto, 54 patients who received CN based on WeChat were considered as the research group, and 46 patients who received the routine nursing intervention were considered as the control group.


## 2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patient has a history of type 2 diabetes and is diagnosed as DN [10]; (2) age > 18; (3) patients can communicate with others normally; (4) the information is complete; (5) Mogensen staging belongs to stage I or II; (6) know the operation of WeChat and use WeChat as the main online chat tool. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with abnormal function of the heart, liver, and kidney; (2) patients with other chronic diseases; (3) those who suffer from hematological and immune diseases; (4) those who cannot receive complete treatment for various reasons.


## 2.3. Methods

### 2.3.1. Routine Nursing Intervention

Patients were given basic health guidance after admission, and routine checkups, and medical and nursing staff followed medical advice to assist patients in treatment. Before discharge, patients were informed of the need for caution and follow-up visits after discharge and biweekly telephone follow-up visits were made to understand patients’ conditions, addressing rehabilitation problems encountered by patients, and give them some psychological guidance.


### 2.3.2. CN Based on WeChat

Firstly, a nursing team was established within the department including attending physicians, head nurses, and experienced nurses. A WeChat group was set up to learn about DN-related knowledge, review past data, summarize the experience and establish a complete intervention plan. CN based on WeChat was then carried out. After that, we assessed patients’ needs based on physical information and develop a plan of care accordingly. Through diet management, medication management, exercise management, emotional management, and other general directions combined with each patient’s situation into a graphic form sent to the WeChat group, to facilitate the daily self-management of patients, family members can also play a supervisory role based on guidance, and to inform the prevention and treatment of common problems, so that patients and family members can face the unexpected situation can be timely response to reduce the risk. WeChat groups were used to pass on treatment cases of previous patients, antidisease tips, etc., to form a correct and positive attitude towards cooperating with treatment, and to provide support and encouragement. We interact with patients through WeChat and other online platforms to eliminate their anxiety and address their actual needs and implement a combination of phased family self-management and regular follow-ups to help patients recover their health in a more comprehensive, rigorous, and efficient manner.Both groups were intervened continuously for 2 months.


## 2.3.1. Routine Nursing Intervention

Patients were given basic health guidance after admission, and routine checkups, and medical and nursing staff followed medical advice to assist patients in treatment. Before discharge, patients were informed of the need for caution and follow-up visits after discharge and biweekly telephone follow-up visits were made to understand patients’ conditions, addressing rehabilitation problems encountered by patients, and give them some psychological guidance.


## 2.3.2. CN Based on WeChat

Firstly, a nursing team was established within the department including attending physicians, head nurses, and experienced nurses. A WeChat group was set up to learn about DN-related knowledge, review past data, summarize the experience and establish a complete intervention plan. CN based on WeChat was then carried out. After that, we assessed patients’ needs based on physical information and develop a plan of care accordingly. Through diet management, medication management, exercise management, emotional management, and other general directions combined with each patient’s situation into a graphic form sent to the WeChat group, to facilitate the daily self-management of patients, family members can also play a supervisory role based on guidance, and to inform the prevention and treatment of common problems, so that patients and family members can face the unexpected situation can be timely response to reduce the risk. WeChat groups were used to pass on treatment cases of previous patients, antidisease tips, etc., to form a correct and positive attitude towards cooperating with treatment, and to provide support and encouragement. We interact with patients through WeChat and other online platforms to eliminate their anxiety and address their actual needs and implement a combination of phased family self-management and regular follow-ups to help patients recover their health in a more comprehensive, rigorous, and efficient manner.Both groups were intervened continuously for 2 months.


## 2.4. Sample Collection and Detection

The related indexes of patients were detected before nursing intervention (T0), one month after intervention (T1), and two months after intervention (T2). Peripheral blood was drawn in a procoagulant tube and sent to the laboratory department of our hospital for routine examination of blood glucose, lipids, and renal function.


## 2.5. Outcome Measures

Blood glucose function: Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (2 h PG). Blood lipid function: Triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C). Renal function: Serum creatinine (Scr), cystatin C (CysC), blood urea nitrogen (BUN). Self-management ability: The out-of-hospital self-care ability was evaluated by the exercise of the self-care agency (ESCA) scale [11], including four items self-concept, self-care responsibility, health knowledge awareness, and self-care skills, with lower scores indicating poorer self-care ability. The self-efficacy before and after care was assessed via the general self-efficacy scale (GSES) [12], with lower scores indicating poorer self-efficacy. Treatment compliance are as follows: Excellent: Patients follow the medical advice, take medication on time, pay attention to diet, hygiene, etc.; Good: Patients basically follow the doctor’s prescription, but the diet was not controlled properly. General: Patients occasionally follow the doctor’s advice and do not pay attention to diet and hygiene. Poor: Patients don’t follow the doctor’s advice. Compliance rate = (excellent + good)/total × 100%. Quality of life: The quality of life was assessed using the short-form 36-item health survey (SF-36) [13], including 8 dimensions (emotional function, social function, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health, physical function, physical role, with a total score of 100 for each dimension, and higher scores indicating better quality of life). Nursing satisfaction: Nursing satisfaction was assessed via the self-made nursing satisfaction scale [14]: Including 22 items, with a total score of 110. 22–43 were very dissatisfied, 44–65 were dissatisfied, 66–87 were average, 88–109 were satisfied and 110 were very satisfied; satisfaction = (very satisfied + satisfied)/total × 100%.


## 2.6. Statistical Method

The data were processed via SPSS23.0. The counting data were expressed as (%) and compared through a chi-square test. The measurement data were represented as (X¯±s), and the statistical analysis includes independent sample t-test, paired t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and LSD post-test. P<0.05 was considered that the difference was statistically marked.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Comparison of Clinical Data

There was no statistical difference between the two groups in comparison to clinical baseline data, (P>0.05), suggesting that both groups were comparable (Table 1).Table 1
Comparison of clinical data [n (%)].
Control group (n = 46)Research group (n = 54)t or χ2PAge (year)56.20 ± 9.7254.58 ± 8.180.9050.368Gender0.1000.752Male27 (58.70)30 (55.56)Female19 (41.30)24 (44.44)BMI (kg/m2)27.82 ± 4.8826.64 ± 3.010.3890.866Course of diabetes (years)9.03 ± 2.848.95 ± 3.010.4330.825Level of educationHigh school or below32350.1360.257University or above1419Living environment0.0470.828Town34 (73.91)37 (68.52)Rural12 (26.09)17 (31.48)Family history of illness0.1500.698Have18 (39.13)18 (33.33)None28 (60.87)36 (66.67)Nationality0.2160.642Han nationality42 (91.30)50 (92.59)Minority4 (8.70)4 (7.41)


### 3.2. Comparison of Blood Glucose Levels

First, we counted the changes in blood glucose during the nursing intervention in both groups. The differences in FPG and 2 h PG were not statistically obvious atT0 (P>0.05), while at T1 and T2, the FPG and 2 h PG in the research group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The blood glucose level of both groups was the highest at T0, decreased at T1, and the lowest at T2 (P<0.05) (Figure 1).Figure 1
Comparison of blood glucose levels. (a) Comparison of FPG levels between the two groups. (b) Comparison of 2 h PG levels between the two groups.∗means P<0.05 compared with the same group at T0, #means P<0.05 compared with the same group at T1, &means P<0.05 compared with the control group.
(a)(b)


### 3.3. Comparison of Blood Lipid Levels

Subsequently, both groups also denoted no difference in TG, LDL-C, and HDL-C between groups atT0 (P>0.05), and TG, LDL-C was lower in the research group than those in the control group at T1 and T2, HDL-C was higher in the research group than that in the control group (P<0.05). Compared with T0, TG and LDL-C in the two groups were significantly lower at T1, and the lowest at T2 and HDL-C showed the opposite trend (P<0.05) (Figure 2).Figure 2
Comparison of blood lipid levels. (a) Comparison of TG levels between the two groups. (b) Comparison of LDL-C levels between the two groups. (c) Comparison of HDL-C levels between the two groups.∗means P<0.05 compared with the same group at T0, #means P<0.05 compared with the same group at T1, &7485means P<0.05 compared with the control group.
(a)(b)(c)


### 3.4. Comparison of Renal Function

Similarly, there was no difference in renal function test results between groups atT0 (P>0.05). At T1 and T2, Scr, CysC, and BUN in the research group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). In addition, renal function in both groups began to decrease at T1 and was lower at T2 (P<0.05) (Figure 3).Figure 3
Comparison of renal function. (a) Comparison of Scr levels between the two groups. (b) Comparison of CysC levels between the two groups. (c) Comparison of BUN levels between the two groups.∗means P<0.05 compared with the same group at T0, #means P<0.05 compared with the same group at T1, &means P<0.05 compared with the control group.
(a)(b)(c)


### 3.5. Comparison of Self-Management Ability

First, ESCA scores revealed no difference between groups in the scores of self-concept, self-care responsibility, health cognitive behaviors, and self-care skills before care (P>0.05), while the scores were higher in the research group than in the control group aftercare (P<0.05). Besides, there was no difference in GSES scores between groups before nursing (P>0.05), but it increased after nursing, and the research group was higher than the control group (P<0.05) (Figure 4).Figure 4
Comparison of self-management ability. (a) Scores of self-concept. (b) Scores of self-care responsibility. (c) Scores of health cognitive behaviors. (d) Scores of self-care skills. (e) GSES scores.∗meUYJ7ans P<0.05 compared with the before nursing, &means P<0.05 compared with the control group.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)


### 3.6. Comparison of Quality of Life

SF-36 score results manifested that the scores of patients in the research group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05), which indicated that the quality of life of patients in the former after nursing was better (Figure 5).Figure 5
Comparison of quality of life. (a) Comparison of emotional function scores. (b) Comparison of social function scores. (c) Comparison of bodily pain scores. (d) Comparison of general health scores. (e) Comparison of vitality scores. (f) Comparison of mental health scores. (g) Comparison of physical function scores. (h) Comparison of physical role scores.∗indicates P<0.05 the comparison between the two groups.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)


### 3.7. Compliance Rate Comparison

The compliance rate of the research group was 87.04%, which was higher than that of the control group (56.52%) (P<0.05) (Table 2).Table 2
Compliance rate comparison [n (%)].
ExcellentGoodGeneralPoorCompliance rate (%)Control group (n = 46)11 (23.91)15 (32.61)12 (26.09)8 (17.39)56.52Research group (n = 54)29 (53.70)18 (33.33)5 (9.26)2 (3.70)87.04χ211.740P<0.001


### 3.8. Comparison of Nursing Satisfaction

In the end, the nursing satisfaction of the research group was 85.19%, which was 58.70% higher than that of the control group (P<0.05) (Table 3).Table 3
Comparison of nursing satisfaction [n (%)].
Very dissatisfiedDissatisfiedAverageSatisfiedVery satisfiedSatisfaction (%)Control group (n = 46)4 (8.70)9 (19.57)6 (13.04)16 (34.78)11 (23.91)58.70Research group (n = 54)1 (1.85)2 (3.70)5 (9.26)20 (37.04)26 (48.15)85.19χ28.843P0.003


## 3.1. Comparison of Clinical Data

There was no statistical difference between the two groups in comparison to clinical baseline data, (P>0.05), suggesting that both groups were comparable (Table 1).Table 1
Comparison of clinical data [n (%)].
Control group (n = 46)Research group (n = 54)t or χ2PAge (year)56.20 ± 9.7254.58 ± 8.180.9050.368Gender0.1000.752Male27 (58.70)30 (55.56)Female19 (41.30)24 (44.44)BMI (kg/m2)27.82 ± 4.8826.64 ± 3.010.3890.866Course of diabetes (years)9.03 ± 2.848.95 ± 3.010.4330.825Level of educationHigh school or below32350.1360.257University or above1419Living environment0.0470.828Town34 (73.91)37 (68.52)Rural12 (26.09)17 (31.48)Family history of illness0.1500.698Have18 (39.13)18 (33.33)None28 (60.87)36 (66.67)Nationality0.2160.642Han nationality42 (91.30)50 (92.59)Minority4 (8.70)4 (7.41)


## 3.2. Comparison of Blood Glucose Levels

First, we counted the changes in blood glucose during the nursing intervention in both groups. The differences in FPG and 2 h PG were not statistically obvious atT0 (P>0.05), while at T1 and T2, the FPG and 2 h PG in the research group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The blood glucose level of both groups was the highest at T0, decreased at T1, and the lowest at T2 (P<0.05) (Figure 1).Figure 1
Comparison of blood glucose levels. (a) Comparison of FPG levels between the two groups. (b) Comparison of 2 h PG levels between the two groups.∗means P<0.05 compared with the same group at T0, #means P<0.05 compared with the same group at T1, &means P<0.05 compared with the control group.
(a)(b)


## 3.3. Comparison of Blood Lipid Levels

Subsequently, both groups also denoted no difference in TG, LDL-C, and HDL-C between groups atT0 (P>0.05), and TG, LDL-C was lower in the research group than those in the control group at T1 and T2, HDL-C was higher in the research group than that in the control group (P<0.05). Compared with T0, TG and LDL-C in the two groups were significantly lower at T1, and the lowest at T2 and HDL-C showed the opposite trend (P<0.05) (Figure 2).Figure 2
Comparison of blood lipid levels. (a) Comparison of TG levels between the two groups. (b) Comparison of LDL-C levels between the two groups. (c) Comparison of HDL-C levels between the two groups.∗means P<0.05 compared with the same group at T0, #means P<0.05 compared with the same group at T1, &7485means P<0.05 compared with the control group.
(a)(b)(c)


## 3.4. Comparison of Renal Function

Similarly, there was no difference in renal function test results between groups atT0 (P>0.05). At T1 and T2, Scr, CysC, and BUN in the research group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). In addition, renal function in both groups began to decrease at T1 and was lower at T2 (P<0.05) (Figure 3).Figure 3
Comparison of renal function. (a) Comparison of Scr levels between the two groups. (b) Comparison of CysC levels between the two groups. (c) Comparison of BUN levels between the two groups.∗means P<0.05 compared with the same group at T0, #means P<0.05 compared with the same group at T1, &means P<0.05 compared with the control group.
(a)(b)(c)


## 3.5. Comparison of Self-Management Ability

First, ESCA scores revealed no difference between groups in the scores of self-concept, self-care responsibility, health cognitive behaviors, and self-care skills before care (P>0.05), while the scores were higher in the research group than in the control group aftercare (P<0.05). Besides, there was no difference in GSES scores between groups before nursing (P>0.05), but it increased after nursing, and the research group was higher than the control group (P<0.05) (Figure 4).Figure 4
Comparison of self-management ability. (a) Scores of self-concept. (b) Scores of self-care responsibility. (c) Scores of health cognitive behaviors. (d) Scores of self-care skills. (e) GSES scores.∗meUYJ7ans P<0.05 compared with the before nursing, &means P<0.05 compared with the control group.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)


## 3.6. Comparison of Quality of Life

SF-36 score results manifested that the scores of patients in the research group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05), which indicated that the quality of life of patients in the former after nursing was better (Figure 5).Figure 5
Comparison of quality of life. (a) Comparison of emotional function scores. (b) Comparison of social function scores. (c) Comparison of bodily pain scores. (d) Comparison of general health scores. (e) Comparison of vitality scores. (f) Comparison of mental health scores. (g) Comparison of physical function scores. (h) Comparison of physical role scores.∗indicates P<0.05 the comparison between the two groups.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)


## 3.7. Compliance Rate Comparison

The compliance rate of the research group was 87.04%, which was higher than that of the control group (56.52%) (P<0.05) (Table 2).Table 2
Compliance rate comparison [n (%)].
ExcellentGoodGeneralPoorCompliance rate (%)Control group (n = 46)11 (23.91)15 (32.61)12 (26.09)8 (17.39)56.52Research group (n = 54)29 (53.70)18 (33.33)5 (9.26)2 (3.70)87.04χ211.740P<0.001


## 3.8. Comparison of Nursing Satisfaction

In the end, the nursing satisfaction of the research group was 85.19%, which was 58.70% higher than that of the control group (P<0.05) (Table 3).Table 3
Comparison of nursing satisfaction [n (%)].
Very dissatisfiedDissatisfiedAverageSatisfiedVery satisfiedSatisfaction (%)Control group (n = 46)4 (8.70)9 (19.57)6 (13.04)16 (34.78)11 (23.91)58.70Research group (n = 54)1 (1.85)2 (3.70)5 (9.26)20 (37.04)26 (48.15)85.19χ28.843P0.003


## 4. Discussion

As a chronic disease, the pathogenesis of DN is not yet fully understood. It is believed that a variety of factors such as genetics, hyperglycemia, hypertension, and renal hemodynamics may cause the occurrence of DN in clinical practice. As DN develops, it will eventually lead to the development of end-stage renal failure, endangering patients’ lives [15]. Currently, the treatment of DN is usually prolonged and conservative, with the aim of controlling the stability of blood glucose and mitigating the pathological progression [16]. Thus, how to ensure that patients receive stable and professional medical guidance during treatment becomes a vital factor in determining the progression of DN. Although the traditional medical service model can provide timely and professional medical services during admission, it is limited by the location and cannot achieve timely and accurate medical follow-up once patients leave the hospital [17]. The best solution to this situation is to provide patients with adequate medical support even during nonadmission periods by extending the cycle of medical care. Hence, how to effectively implement this protocol is the focus of modern clinical research.Traditional CN services are usually provided only through regular patient review or telephone follow-up, which is less effective and not ideal for care delivery [18]. With the development of the mobile Internet, WeChat has built an important communication platform for social intercourse, allowing real-time text, voice, and video communication with others, and sharing articles, pictures, and videos, which greatly facilitates people’s lives [19]. CN based on WeChat, on the other hand, can not only compensate for the lack of effectiveness of traditional CN by carrying out nursing services with WeChat, the most popularly used cell phone software in modern Chinese society but also improve the quality of nursing services through more diverse and richer ways of delivering confidence [20]. As DN is extremely long and requires strict adherence to medical treatment, CN is highly applicable in it. Although several studies have confirmed the significant advantages of CN based on WeChat in providing long-term care services for patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease [21, 22], studies on DN are still relatively rare. Therefore, this research is a crucial reference for future clinical development of DN consultation and treatment services.We first followed up on the blood glucose, blood lipid, and renal function of patients during the nursing intervention. It revealed that the improvement of blood glucose, blood lipid, and renal function of patients in the research group were better than those in the control group after the nursing intervention, suggesting that the pathological control effect of CN based on WeChat on DN patients is better. In previous studies, we found that CN based on WeChat can be more effective in improving the pathological process of diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure [23, 24], which can also testify to the results of this experiment and once again validate the excellent application of CN based on WeChat in the provision of long-term care services. We believe that this is due to the higher effectiveness of CN based on WeChat. For healthcare professionals, the CN based on WeChat allows them to upload medical records to the WeChat Cloud, providing them with a timely, comprehensive, and detailed view of patients’ conditions at any time. As for patients, medical staff can release videos and pictures of related diseases to upload to WeChat groups and explain to patients through voice and video, which is not only convenient for them to view information at any time, but also can further help them understand the knowledge of related diseases, which is very helpful for their own disease recovery. Because of this, patients in the research group will have a fuller and more comprehensive understanding of DN and will have improved self-management and self-care abilities, which can be fully illustrated by the increased ESCA and GSES scores of patients. We believe that through the CN based on WeChat, we can make DN patients form a whole outside the hospital. On the one hand, we can teach patients about the disease in rich ways. On the other hand, we can allow patients to exchange their experiences related to disease treatment with each other, and continuously strengthen their knowledge and understanding of DN and thus enhance their self-management and self-care ability. Finally, adherence to treatment during the long treatment cycle is also an indicator that deserves our attention. Our survey also revealed higher adherence to treatment in the research group, which also has important positive implications for DN. The quality-of-life scores of patients in the research group were all higher than those of the control group, which can also fully illustrate the positive significance of the CN based on WeChat. Finally, the elevated satisfaction of care in the research group also fully illustrates the higher acceptance and applicability of CN based on WeChat for DN treatment.Nevertheless, there are still many limitations. First, the limited number of cases in our study and the short follow-up period does not yet allow us to assess the impact of CN based on WeChat on the long-term prognosis of DN patients. Second, there is still a lack of uniform clinical guidelines for CN based on WeChat. Hence, the specific details of implementation still require continuous refinement and improvement in order to provide the best possible care for our patients.In summary, CN based on WeChat can effectively improve the self-management behavior and quality of life of DN patients, which is extremely suitable for such chronic diseases with extremely long treatment cycles and can provide a more effective guarantee for their recovery.



---

*Source: 5131830-2022-09-21.xml*