# Identification and Analysis of Chemical Constituents and Rat Serum Metabolites inLycopodium clavatum Using UPLC-Q-TOF/MS Combined with Multiple Data-Processing Approaches

Authors: Xin Li; Mingqin Kang; Ningning Ma; Tan Pang; Yanjun Zhang; Hua Jin; Zhen Yang; Lili Song
Journal: Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

Lycopodium clavatum is a dry whole grass ofLycopodium japonicum Thunb.; it has been extensively used to anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antimicrobial actions and inhibits acetylcholinesterase activity. However, it lacks further compounds research ofLycopodium clavatum invivo and invitro. In this work, a rapid method was established using the ultra high performance liquid chromatography with quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-Q-TOF/MS) combined with multiple data-processing approaches for compounds analysis ofLycopodium clavatum invitro and invivo. Finally, 30 peaks were characterized in 75% ethanol extract ofLycopodium clavatum and 17 peaks were characterized in rat plasma that including 12 prototype compounds and 5 metabolites. Methylation and demethylation are the main transformation reactions ofLycopodium clavatum in rat serum. This work could be helpful for understanding the complex compounds ofLycopodium clavatum and further analyzing the pharmacological studies of active compounds.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Lycopodium clavatum(LC) is a dry whole grass ofLycopodium japonicumThunb.; it has been widely used to anti-inflammatory [1], antioxidant, and antimicrobial actions [2] and inhibits acetylcholinesterase activity [3–5], meanwhile, it has antioxidative, antiproliferative, and biochemical effects for HepG2 cells [6]. In recent years, literature reports of LC pay more attention to analyzing component invitro. LC mainly contains alkaloids [7] and triterpenoids [8–11]. Alkaloids are divided into four types with the structural characteristics, including lycopodine, lycodine, fawcettimine, and miscellaneous. Four types of mother nucleus all have the same configuration, so it is inferred that there is a common biological origin and transformation relationship between them [12, 13]. So far, there have been few reports on the chemical constituents of LC, and there is almost no research on the blood components in the body. Therefore, it is especially important for the chemical composition of LC invivo and invitro. At present, LC-MS is often used to analyze and determine the component of traditional Chinese medicine, especially the technology of UPLC-Q-TOF/MS [14, 15]. UPLC-Q-TOF/MS combined with multiple data processing approaches can improve efficiency and obtain abundant information, which can be utilized as a practical model for the study of component [16, 17]. The combination of the technology has the advantages of high efficiency, wide molecular mass range, high sensitivity, low error rate, and high reproducibility [18, 19]. In this work, a rapid method will be established for the compounds analysis of LC invitro and invivo by the ultra high performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) with quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry combined with multiple data-processing approaches, which can be used to further analyze the chemical composition invivo and invitro.


## 2. Methods and Materials

### 2.1. Chemicals and Materials

Lycopodium clavatum was purchased from Beijing Huamiao Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. It was identified as a dry whole grass ofLycopodium japonicumThunb. by Professor Tianxiang Li from the College of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Methanol and acetonitrile (HPLC grade) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (America). Formic acid (HPLC grade) was purchased from Aladdin (America). Water was acquired from Wahaha (China). Ethanol (analysis grade) was purchased from Beijing Chemical Works (China). Male SD rats (200 ± 10g) were obtained from Beijing Huakangkang Biotechnology Co. Ltd.


### 2.2. Preparation of Lycopodium clavatum Samples In Vitro

Lycopodium clavatum were added 10 times and 6 times 75% (v/v) ethanol, respectively, and were reflux extracted twice for 1 h each time. After being extracted, the extract was filtered and condensed to 1 g/mL. The concentrate was diluted to 10mg/mL by water with acetonitrile: 0.1% formic acid=1:1 (v/v) and through 0.22μm filter membranes before analysis.


### 2.3. Animal Experiments

Male SD rats were acclimatized for 1 week before the experiment and collected blank blood. The suspension solution ofLycopodium clavatum was intragastrical administered at a dose of 10.8 g/kg for 3 days. After the last administration, the rats were collected blood by orbital vein at 15 min, 1 h, 4 h, and 8 h. All samples were centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C and the plasma supernatant was pipetted.


### 2.4. Preparation of Plasma Samples In Vivo

For analysis, plasma was consolidated including the different blood collection points and 500μL plasma was added 1 mL acetonitrile for protein precipitation. After vortexed vigorously for 1 min, the samples were centrifuged at 13, 000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C and pipetted plasma supernatant. 1 mL acetonitrile was added to the residue and the above operation was repeated one time. Two-part supernatants were combined and was evaporated to dried under N2 at 45°C. The residue was dissolved with 100μL methanol, vortex-mixed for 1 min before being centrifuged at 13,000 rpm at 4°C for 15 min and then pipetted plasma supernatant for analysis.


### 2.5. Chromatographic Analysis

The supernatant of sample was using A Waters ACQUITY I Class UPLC coupled to a Waters Xevo G2 Q TOF mass spectrometer, where the parameters were as follows. The chromatographic column was ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 Column (2.1×100 mm, 1.8μm, Waters Corporation, America). Mobile phases consisted of acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid (phase A) and ultrapure water with 0.1% formic acid (phase B). Whole analysis process, runtime was 25min, the flow rate was set at 0.2 mL/min, and the temperature of the column was set at 40°C. The linear elution gradient program was used as follows: 0.5-1.5 min, 99–90% B; 1.5-4 min, 90-85% B; 4-8 min, 85-70% B; 8-9 min, 70-50% B; 9-11.5min, 50-20% B; 11.5-14 min, 20-0% B; 14-17 min, 0%B; 17-18 min, 0-99%B. The injection volume was set at 5μL.


### 2.6. MS Conditions

An UPLC-Q-TOF/MS (waters, America) instrument is equipped with both positive and negative ESI source for sample analysis. The samples were measured from 50 to 1,000 mass-to-charge ratios (m/z) and the temperature of nitrogen was set to 350°C. The temperature of dissolvent was set to 80°C and the gas flow was set to 600 L/h. The capillary voltage was set to 3.0kV in positive ion mode, and it was set to 2.5 kV in negative ion mode.


### 2.7. Data Processing

A rapid analysis of the extract ofLycopodium clavatum was carried out to obtain the retention time and the exact molecular weight of each component. The possible elemental composition was obtained through the MassLynx V4.1 workstation, and only those formulas with an error less than 10 ppm were accepted. The probable molecular formulas were matched with the relevant literature and databases such as SciFinder and MassBank. Meanwhile, to combine with MS and MS/MS information inferred the compound and its structure.Raw spectrometric data were processed by MassLynx software (version 4.1, Waters Co., Cicero, America) and converted to a data matrix contain sample name, t-m/z and peak intensity. Data was further processed, including peak matching, peak alignment, and normalization, before multivariate analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed using a combination of principal component analysis (PCA) and the orthogonal projection to least-squared discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) by SIMCA-P software (version 12.0), and then was further performed usingt-test for Microsoft Excel software (version 2010). Metabolites were retained in the model based on a combination of variable importance in projection (VIP) greater than 1.0 and P value of less than 0.05.MetaboLynx XS version 4.1 (Waters, Milford, America) can be used to find the unknown drug metabolites invivo. Biotransformation reactions were set according to its different structure and the peak intensity threshold of 40 with tolerance was set at 0.05 Da. The result of possible metabolites and its biotransformation reactions were determined by the relevant literature and MS and MS/MS information.


## 2.1. Chemicals and Materials

Lycopodium clavatum was purchased from Beijing Huamiao Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. It was identified as a dry whole grass ofLycopodium japonicumThunb. by Professor Tianxiang Li from the College of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Methanol and acetonitrile (HPLC grade) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (America). Formic acid (HPLC grade) was purchased from Aladdin (America). Water was acquired from Wahaha (China). Ethanol (analysis grade) was purchased from Beijing Chemical Works (China). Male SD rats (200 ± 10g) were obtained from Beijing Huakangkang Biotechnology Co. Ltd.


## 2.2. Preparation of Lycopodium clavatum Samples In Vitro

Lycopodium clavatum were added 10 times and 6 times 75% (v/v) ethanol, respectively, and were reflux extracted twice for 1 h each time. After being extracted, the extract was filtered and condensed to 1 g/mL. The concentrate was diluted to 10mg/mL by water with acetonitrile: 0.1% formic acid=1:1 (v/v) and through 0.22μm filter membranes before analysis.


## 2.3. Animal Experiments

Male SD rats were acclimatized for 1 week before the experiment and collected blank blood. The suspension solution ofLycopodium clavatum was intragastrical administered at a dose of 10.8 g/kg for 3 days. After the last administration, the rats were collected blood by orbital vein at 15 min, 1 h, 4 h, and 8 h. All samples were centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C and the plasma supernatant was pipetted.


## 2.4. Preparation of Plasma Samples In Vivo

For analysis, plasma was consolidated including the different blood collection points and 500μL plasma was added 1 mL acetonitrile for protein precipitation. After vortexed vigorously for 1 min, the samples were centrifuged at 13, 000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C and pipetted plasma supernatant. 1 mL acetonitrile was added to the residue and the above operation was repeated one time. Two-part supernatants were combined and was evaporated to dried under N2 at 45°C. The residue was dissolved with 100μL methanol, vortex-mixed for 1 min before being centrifuged at 13,000 rpm at 4°C for 15 min and then pipetted plasma supernatant for analysis.


## 2.5. Chromatographic Analysis

The supernatant of sample was using A Waters ACQUITY I Class UPLC coupled to a Waters Xevo G2 Q TOF mass spectrometer, where the parameters were as follows. The chromatographic column was ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 Column (2.1×100 mm, 1.8μm, Waters Corporation, America). Mobile phases consisted of acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid (phase A) and ultrapure water with 0.1% formic acid (phase B). Whole analysis process, runtime was 25min, the flow rate was set at 0.2 mL/min, and the temperature of the column was set at 40°C. The linear elution gradient program was used as follows: 0.5-1.5 min, 99–90% B; 1.5-4 min, 90-85% B; 4-8 min, 85-70% B; 8-9 min, 70-50% B; 9-11.5min, 50-20% B; 11.5-14 min, 20-0% B; 14-17 min, 0%B; 17-18 min, 0-99%B. The injection volume was set at 5μL.


## 2.6. MS Conditions

An UPLC-Q-TOF/MS (waters, America) instrument is equipped with both positive and negative ESI source for sample analysis. The samples were measured from 50 to 1,000 mass-to-charge ratios (m/z) and the temperature of nitrogen was set to 350°C. The temperature of dissolvent was set to 80°C and the gas flow was set to 600 L/h. The capillary voltage was set to 3.0kV in positive ion mode, and it was set to 2.5 kV in negative ion mode.


## 2.7. Data Processing

A rapid analysis of the extract ofLycopodium clavatum was carried out to obtain the retention time and the exact molecular weight of each component. The possible elemental composition was obtained through the MassLynx V4.1 workstation, and only those formulas with an error less than 10 ppm were accepted. The probable molecular formulas were matched with the relevant literature and databases such as SciFinder and MassBank. Meanwhile, to combine with MS and MS/MS information inferred the compound and its structure.Raw spectrometric data were processed by MassLynx software (version 4.1, Waters Co., Cicero, America) and converted to a data matrix contain sample name, t-m/z and peak intensity. Data was further processed, including peak matching, peak alignment, and normalization, before multivariate analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed using a combination of principal component analysis (PCA) and the orthogonal projection to least-squared discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) by SIMCA-P software (version 12.0), and then was further performed usingt-test for Microsoft Excel software (version 2010). Metabolites were retained in the model based on a combination of variable importance in projection (VIP) greater than 1.0 and P value of less than 0.05.MetaboLynx XS version 4.1 (Waters, Milford, America) can be used to find the unknown drug metabolites invivo. Biotransformation reactions were set according to its different structure and the peak intensity threshold of 40 with tolerance was set at 0.05 Da. The result of possible metabolites and its biotransformation reactions were determined by the relevant literature and MS and MS/MS information.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Establishment of Compounds Database

To quickly and easily identify the compounds ofLycopodium clavatum, we established compounds database by collecting information of literature in ten years [7–11, 20–24] and searching web databases including Pubmed, SciFinder, and MassBank. The database includes 121 prototype compounds ofLycopodium clavatumthat was shown in Table S1, including name, molecular formula, molecular weight, and structure, to support the results of identification for further analysis invitro and invivo.


### 3.2. UHPLC–MS Analysis and Identification of Lycopodium clavatum In Vitro

Under the above MS and chromatographic conditions, the chromatogram of the base peak ion (BPI), the extract sample ofLycopodium clavatum was shown in Figure 1. According to the chromatogram, the baseline was stable and the chromatographic peaks were well separated, indicating that the various components ofLycopodium clavatum extract could be well separated in the data collection range.Figure 1
ESI base peak ion (BPI) chromatogram of the extract sample ofLycopodium clavatum extracts analyzed by UPLC–Q-TOF/MS in both positive (a) and negative (b) ion mode.
(a) (b)The potential compounds were identified by comparing the information of MS and MS/MS; meanwhile, the result was associated with the relevant literature and databases for further determination. For Examples, the precise molecular weight was 366.2274 and the retention time was 7.89 min. The main fragment ions that were analyzed by the MS/MS screening were observed atm/z 348[M+H-H2O] +, 288[M+H -C2O2H4] +, 228[M+H-C4O4H8]+ in the positive ion spectrum. Based on MS and MS/MS data obtained and the analysis of elemental composition, the molecular formula of the ion was speculated of C20H31NO5. Combining with literature [24] it was inferred from acetyllycofawcine. Mass spectrum and proposed fragmentation pathway of acetyllycofawcine were shown in Figure 2. Finally, a total of 30 compounds were identified (characteristic peaks were labeled on the BPI chromatographic), including 21 alkaloids, 7 triterpenoids, and 2 other classes compound. The detailed information of compound name, molecular weight, molecular formula, and characteristic peak was shown in Table 1.Table 1
Identification of the components fromLycopodium clavatum in vitro.
NO. t R(min) Measured Mass (m/z) Fragment ions (m/z) Formula Error (ppm) Identification 1 3.8002 278.1756 260, 162, 134 C 16 H 23 N O 3 0 8β-hydroxylycoposerramine 2 4.1863 266.2119 248, 230, 202 C 1 6 H 2 7 N O 2 0.38 aeacetylfawcettiine 3 4.6209 292.1914 274, 203, 135 C 1 7 H 2 5 N O 3 0.34 palhinine A 4 4.6343 273.1963 243, 200, 186 C 1 7 H 2 4 N 2 O 1.46 obscurinene 5 4.9963 296.185 278, 260, 234 C 1 6 H 2 5 N O 4 4.05 4α,8β,12β-trihydroxylycopodine 6 5.1711 274.1811 231, 167, 158 C 1 7 H 2 3 N O 2 1.46 lycojaponicumin C 7 5.2178 262.1807 234, 206, 164 C 1 6 H 2 3 N O 2 0 lycopoclavamine A 8 5.2195 260.1661 246, 24, 216 C 1 6 H 2 1 N O 2 3.84 huperzine E [4] 9 5.3981 280.1912 262, 244, 163 C 1 6 H 2 5 N O 3 0.36 6α,8β-dihydroxylycopodine or 4α,8β-dihydroxylycopodine 10 5.5543 261.1966 245, 202, 188 C 1 6 H 2 4 N 2 O 0.38 des-N-methyl-α-obscurine 11 5.8878 275.2125 244, 188, 148 C 1 7 H 2 6 N 2 O 0.73 α-obscurine 12 6.0787 278.212 260, 217, 189 C 1 7 H 2 7 N O 2 0 (15R)-14,15-dihydroepilobscurinol 13 6.2025 248.2016 230, 145, 105 C 1 6 H 2 5 N O 0.81 lycopodine 14 6.4302 322.2037 244, 216, 176 C 1 8 H 2 7 N O 4 5.9 8β-acetoxy-12β-hydroxy-lycopodine or 8β-acetoxy-11α-hydroxy-lycopodine or 8β-hydroxy-11α-acetoxy-lycopodine 15 6.4922 246.1854 218, 176, 124 C 1 6 H 2 3 N O 1.62 anhydrolycodoline 16 6.5863 264.1966 228, 242, 191 C 1 6 H 2 5 N O 2 0.76 lycodoline 17 6.7897 308.2226 248, 230, 159 C 1 8 H 2 9 N O 3 0 α-lofoline 18 7.3916 276.1962 218, 166, 150 C 1 7 H 2 5 N O 2 0.72 lycoflexine 19 7.8795 366.2274 348, 288, 228 C 2 0 H 3 1 N O 5 3.82 acetyllycofawcine 20 8.2908 350.2324 290, 230 C 2 0 H 3 1 N O 4 2.28 acetylfawcettiine 21 8.5172 195.066 167, 152, 115 C 1 0 H 1 0 O 4 1.54 ferulic acid 22 10.2069 505.3513 487, 263, 199 C 3 0 H 4 8 O 6 3.17 16-oxolyclanitin 23 11.0118 489.3571 471. 453, 345 C 3 0 H 4 8 O 5 1.84 japonicumin B or lycoclavanin 24 12.1919 473.362 102,111,167 C 3 0 H 4 8 O 4 2.32 3R,21α,24-trihydroxyserrat-14-en-16-one 25 12.6387 475.377 457, 410, 237 C 3 0 H 5 0 O 4 3.58 Lycoclaninol [4] or japonicumin A 26 13.0973 461.362 443,441,102 C 2 9 H 4 8 O 4 2.38 lycojaponicuminol C 27 14.2839 445.3667 279,427,319 C 2 9 H 4 8 O 3 3.37 26-nor-8-oxo-α-onocerin 28 15.3438 457.3664 439,397 C 3 0 H 4 8 O 3 3.93 lycojaponicuminol A 29 15.5437 459.3828 441,398,397 C 3 0 H 5 0 O 3 2.18 3-epilycoclavanol or3β,21β,24-3-trihydroxyserrat-14-ene or3α,21β,24-4-trihydroxyserrat-14-ene 30 16.1058 603.4045[M-H] 116,132,134 C 3 9 H 5 6 O 5 0.66 lycojaponicuminol DFigure 2
The mass spectra of acetyllycofawcine analyzed by UHPLC–Q-TOF-MS. the MS spectrum (a); the MSMS spectrum (b); proposed fragmentation pathways of acetyllycofawcine (c).
(a) (b) (c)


### 3.3. Multivariate Statistical Analysis and Identification of Plasma Sample after Oral Lycopodium clavatum In Vivo

In order to analyze the compounds ofLycopodium clavatum in plasma, the two groups were compared between the plasma sample ofLycopodium clavatum group and the control group that the chromatogram of BPI was shown in Figure 3, and then multivariate statistical analysis was used to further discover the prototype compounds invivo.Figure 3
ESI base peak ion (BPI) chromatogram of the plasma sample ofLycopodium clavatum extracts analyzed by UPLC–Q-TOF/MS in both positive (a) and negative (b) ion mode; ESI base peak ion (BPI) chromatogram of the control plasma sample ofLycopodium clavatum extracts analyzed by UPLC–Q-TOF/MS in both positive (c) and negative (d) ion mode.
(a) (b) (c) (d)PCA is a chemometric method that uses the idea of dimensionality reduction to transform multiple indicators into several comprehensive indicators with little information loss. In the PCA score (Figure4), it could be observed that the plasma samples of drug-administered group and blank group were divided into two discrete groups, indicating that there was a significant difference in the drug-administered group and blank group. In order to further analyze the metabolic differences between the blank group and the drug-administered group in plasma samples, an in-depth analysis of the data (OPLS-DA) is required. According to the OPLS-DA score (Figure 4), it was clearly observed that the two groups plasma samples were divided into 2 discrete groups, which was better than the score of PCA. VIP value reflects the contribution of the variable in the classification. The larger the VIP value, the greater the contribution of the variable to the entire model classification. Generally, VIP value is greater than 1 as the characteristic variable of the metabolic. The value of VIP greater than 1 was screened and further analyzed. Finally, a total of 12 compounds were identified by the data of MS, MS/MS information, and the relevant literature and databases. They were lycojaponicumin C (6), huperzine E (8), des-N-methyl-α-obscurine (10), α-obscurine (11), lycopodine (13), 8β-acetoxy-12β-hydroxy-lycopodine or 8β-acetoxy-11α-hydroxy-lycopodine or 8β-hydroxy-11α- Acetoxylycopodine (14), lycodoline (16), α-lofoline or fawcettiine (17), acetylfawcettiine (20), japonicumin B or lycoclavanin (23), 3R, 21α, 24-trihydroxyserrat-14-en-16-one (24) and lycojaponicuminol C (26). Among them, α-obscurine (11) and lycodoline (16) were identified by comparison with the information of the standard, including retention time, MS and MSMS data. Next, the more standard will be purchased and used to further qualitative analysis of the compounds ofLycopodium clavatum.Figure 4
Multivariate statistical analysis and identification of plasma sample ofLycopodium clavatum. PCA ofLycopodium clavatum group vs. control group in positive mode (a) and negative mode (b); 3D-OPLS-DA ofLycopodium clavatum group vs. control group in positive mode (c) and negative mode (d).
(a) (b) (c) (d)


### 3.4. Metabolites Identified Using MetaboLynx Tool

After the drug gets into the body, some components exist as the form of prototype, but most of them are structurally modified based on the original drug components, such as methylation and glutathione conjugation. The metabolite is structurally similar to the prototype drug and has characteristic mass spectrometry fragmentation of the prototype drug, so the structure of the metabolite can be inferred by characteristic fragment between the prototype and metabolite. Using MetaboLynx XS to process the data to analyze the plasma samples, most of the potential metabolites were identified. Finally, 5 metabolites were detected from theLycopodium clavatum. The molecular weight of lycojaponicumin C (6) was 274.1811 and the formula was C17H23NO2. The precise molecular weight of M1 was 260.1653 that had a neutral loss of 14 Da compared with lycojaponicumin C (6) and the main fragment ions was 167, 158, and 125 that were the same as the main fragment ions of lycojaponicumin C (6); it is inferred that M1 is a metabolite of the demethylation of the lycojaponicumin C. Finally, a total of 5 metabolites were identified the same way. M2 is a metabolite of the methylation of the palhinine A, M3 is a metabolite of the methylation of the (15R)-14,15-dihydroepilobscurinol, M4 is a metabolite of the methylation of lycodoline, and M5 is a metabolite of the demethylation of α-lofoline. The detailed information of prototype, metabolite name, molecular weight, and molecular formula was given in Table 2.Table 2
Identification of the metabolites fromLycopodium clavatum in vivo.
NO. t R(min) Measured Mass (m/z) Metabolite Name Formula Error (ppm) Prototype M1 5.2 260.1653 demethylation C16H21NO2 1 lycojaponicumin C M2 6.95 306.2077 methylation C 18 H 27 N O 3 2.6 palhinine A M3 9.17 292.2287 methylation C 18 H 29 N O 2 3.7 (15R)-14,15-dihydroepilobscurinol M4 7.12 278.2127 methylation C 17 H 27 N O 2 2.6 lycodoline M5 3.57 294.2076 demethylation C 17 H 27 N O 3 2.4 α-lofoline


## 3.1. Establishment of Compounds Database

To quickly and easily identify the compounds ofLycopodium clavatum, we established compounds database by collecting information of literature in ten years [7–11, 20–24] and searching web databases including Pubmed, SciFinder, and MassBank. The database includes 121 prototype compounds ofLycopodium clavatumthat was shown in Table S1, including name, molecular formula, molecular weight, and structure, to support the results of identification for further analysis invitro and invivo.


## 3.2. UHPLC–MS Analysis and Identification of Lycopodium clavatum In Vitro

Under the above MS and chromatographic conditions, the chromatogram of the base peak ion (BPI), the extract sample ofLycopodium clavatum was shown in Figure 1. According to the chromatogram, the baseline was stable and the chromatographic peaks were well separated, indicating that the various components ofLycopodium clavatum extract could be well separated in the data collection range.Figure 1
ESI base peak ion (BPI) chromatogram of the extract sample ofLycopodium clavatum extracts analyzed by UPLC–Q-TOF/MS in both positive (a) and negative (b) ion mode.
(a) (b)The potential compounds were identified by comparing the information of MS and MS/MS; meanwhile, the result was associated with the relevant literature and databases for further determination. For Examples, the precise molecular weight was 366.2274 and the retention time was 7.89 min. The main fragment ions that were analyzed by the MS/MS screening were observed atm/z 348[M+H-H2O] +, 288[M+H -C2O2H4] +, 228[M+H-C4O4H8]+ in the positive ion spectrum. Based on MS and MS/MS data obtained and the analysis of elemental composition, the molecular formula of the ion was speculated of C20H31NO5. Combining with literature [24] it was inferred from acetyllycofawcine. Mass spectrum and proposed fragmentation pathway of acetyllycofawcine were shown in Figure 2. Finally, a total of 30 compounds were identified (characteristic peaks were labeled on the BPI chromatographic), including 21 alkaloids, 7 triterpenoids, and 2 other classes compound. The detailed information of compound name, molecular weight, molecular formula, and characteristic peak was shown in Table 1.Table 1
Identification of the components fromLycopodium clavatum in vitro.
NO. t R(min) Measured Mass (m/z) Fragment ions (m/z) Formula Error (ppm) Identification 1 3.8002 278.1756 260, 162, 134 C 16 H 23 N O 3 0 8β-hydroxylycoposerramine 2 4.1863 266.2119 248, 230, 202 C 1 6 H 2 7 N O 2 0.38 aeacetylfawcettiine 3 4.6209 292.1914 274, 203, 135 C 1 7 H 2 5 N O 3 0.34 palhinine A 4 4.6343 273.1963 243, 200, 186 C 1 7 H 2 4 N 2 O 1.46 obscurinene 5 4.9963 296.185 278, 260, 234 C 1 6 H 2 5 N O 4 4.05 4α,8β,12β-trihydroxylycopodine 6 5.1711 274.1811 231, 167, 158 C 1 7 H 2 3 N O 2 1.46 lycojaponicumin C 7 5.2178 262.1807 234, 206, 164 C 1 6 H 2 3 N O 2 0 lycopoclavamine A 8 5.2195 260.1661 246, 24, 216 C 1 6 H 2 1 N O 2 3.84 huperzine E [4] 9 5.3981 280.1912 262, 244, 163 C 1 6 H 2 5 N O 3 0.36 6α,8β-dihydroxylycopodine or 4α,8β-dihydroxylycopodine 10 5.5543 261.1966 245, 202, 188 C 1 6 H 2 4 N 2 O 0.38 des-N-methyl-α-obscurine 11 5.8878 275.2125 244, 188, 148 C 1 7 H 2 6 N 2 O 0.73 α-obscurine 12 6.0787 278.212 260, 217, 189 C 1 7 H 2 7 N O 2 0 (15R)-14,15-dihydroepilobscurinol 13 6.2025 248.2016 230, 145, 105 C 1 6 H 2 5 N O 0.81 lycopodine 14 6.4302 322.2037 244, 216, 176 C 1 8 H 2 7 N O 4 5.9 8β-acetoxy-12β-hydroxy-lycopodine or 8β-acetoxy-11α-hydroxy-lycopodine or 8β-hydroxy-11α-acetoxy-lycopodine 15 6.4922 246.1854 218, 176, 124 C 1 6 H 2 3 N O 1.62 anhydrolycodoline 16 6.5863 264.1966 228, 242, 191 C 1 6 H 2 5 N O 2 0.76 lycodoline 17 6.7897 308.2226 248, 230, 159 C 1 8 H 2 9 N O 3 0 α-lofoline 18 7.3916 276.1962 218, 166, 150 C 1 7 H 2 5 N O 2 0.72 lycoflexine 19 7.8795 366.2274 348, 288, 228 C 2 0 H 3 1 N O 5 3.82 acetyllycofawcine 20 8.2908 350.2324 290, 230 C 2 0 H 3 1 N O 4 2.28 acetylfawcettiine 21 8.5172 195.066 167, 152, 115 C 1 0 H 1 0 O 4 1.54 ferulic acid 22 10.2069 505.3513 487, 263, 199 C 3 0 H 4 8 O 6 3.17 16-oxolyclanitin 23 11.0118 489.3571 471. 453, 345 C 3 0 H 4 8 O 5 1.84 japonicumin B or lycoclavanin 24 12.1919 473.362 102,111,167 C 3 0 H 4 8 O 4 2.32 3R,21α,24-trihydroxyserrat-14-en-16-one 25 12.6387 475.377 457, 410, 237 C 3 0 H 5 0 O 4 3.58 Lycoclaninol [4] or japonicumin A 26 13.0973 461.362 443,441,102 C 2 9 H 4 8 O 4 2.38 lycojaponicuminol C 27 14.2839 445.3667 279,427,319 C 2 9 H 4 8 O 3 3.37 26-nor-8-oxo-α-onocerin 28 15.3438 457.3664 439,397 C 3 0 H 4 8 O 3 3.93 lycojaponicuminol A 29 15.5437 459.3828 441,398,397 C 3 0 H 5 0 O 3 2.18 3-epilycoclavanol or3β,21β,24-3-trihydroxyserrat-14-ene or3α,21β,24-4-trihydroxyserrat-14-ene 30 16.1058 603.4045[M-H] 116,132,134 C 3 9 H 5 6 O 5 0.66 lycojaponicuminol DFigure 2
The mass spectra of acetyllycofawcine analyzed by UHPLC–Q-TOF-MS. the MS spectrum (a); the MSMS spectrum (b); proposed fragmentation pathways of acetyllycofawcine (c).
(a) (b) (c)


## 3.3. Multivariate Statistical Analysis and Identification of Plasma Sample after Oral Lycopodium clavatum In Vivo

In order to analyze the compounds ofLycopodium clavatum in plasma, the two groups were compared between the plasma sample ofLycopodium clavatum group and the control group that the chromatogram of BPI was shown in Figure 3, and then multivariate statistical analysis was used to further discover the prototype compounds invivo.Figure 3
ESI base peak ion (BPI) chromatogram of the plasma sample ofLycopodium clavatum extracts analyzed by UPLC–Q-TOF/MS in both positive (a) and negative (b) ion mode; ESI base peak ion (BPI) chromatogram of the control plasma sample ofLycopodium clavatum extracts analyzed by UPLC–Q-TOF/MS in both positive (c) and negative (d) ion mode.
(a) (b) (c) (d)PCA is a chemometric method that uses the idea of dimensionality reduction to transform multiple indicators into several comprehensive indicators with little information loss. In the PCA score (Figure4), it could be observed that the plasma samples of drug-administered group and blank group were divided into two discrete groups, indicating that there was a significant difference in the drug-administered group and blank group. In order to further analyze the metabolic differences between the blank group and the drug-administered group in plasma samples, an in-depth analysis of the data (OPLS-DA) is required. According to the OPLS-DA score (Figure 4), it was clearly observed that the two groups plasma samples were divided into 2 discrete groups, which was better than the score of PCA. VIP value reflects the contribution of the variable in the classification. The larger the VIP value, the greater the contribution of the variable to the entire model classification. Generally, VIP value is greater than 1 as the characteristic variable of the metabolic. The value of VIP greater than 1 was screened and further analyzed. Finally, a total of 12 compounds were identified by the data of MS, MS/MS information, and the relevant literature and databases. They were lycojaponicumin C (6), huperzine E (8), des-N-methyl-α-obscurine (10), α-obscurine (11), lycopodine (13), 8β-acetoxy-12β-hydroxy-lycopodine or 8β-acetoxy-11α-hydroxy-lycopodine or 8β-hydroxy-11α- Acetoxylycopodine (14), lycodoline (16), α-lofoline or fawcettiine (17), acetylfawcettiine (20), japonicumin B or lycoclavanin (23), 3R, 21α, 24-trihydroxyserrat-14-en-16-one (24) and lycojaponicuminol C (26). Among them, α-obscurine (11) and lycodoline (16) were identified by comparison with the information of the standard, including retention time, MS and MSMS data. Next, the more standard will be purchased and used to further qualitative analysis of the compounds ofLycopodium clavatum.Figure 4
Multivariate statistical analysis and identification of plasma sample ofLycopodium clavatum. PCA ofLycopodium clavatum group vs. control group in positive mode (a) and negative mode (b); 3D-OPLS-DA ofLycopodium clavatum group vs. control group in positive mode (c) and negative mode (d).
(a) (b) (c) (d)


## 3.4. Metabolites Identified Using MetaboLynx Tool

After the drug gets into the body, some components exist as the form of prototype, but most of them are structurally modified based on the original drug components, such as methylation and glutathione conjugation. The metabolite is structurally similar to the prototype drug and has characteristic mass spectrometry fragmentation of the prototype drug, so the structure of the metabolite can be inferred by characteristic fragment between the prototype and metabolite. Using MetaboLynx XS to process the data to analyze the plasma samples, most of the potential metabolites were identified. Finally, 5 metabolites were detected from theLycopodium clavatum. The molecular weight of lycojaponicumin C (6) was 274.1811 and the formula was C17H23NO2. The precise molecular weight of M1 was 260.1653 that had a neutral loss of 14 Da compared with lycojaponicumin C (6) and the main fragment ions was 167, 158, and 125 that were the same as the main fragment ions of lycojaponicumin C (6); it is inferred that M1 is a metabolite of the demethylation of the lycojaponicumin C. Finally, a total of 5 metabolites were identified the same way. M2 is a metabolite of the methylation of the palhinine A, M3 is a metabolite of the methylation of the (15R)-14,15-dihydroepilobscurinol, M4 is a metabolite of the methylation of lycodoline, and M5 is a metabolite of the demethylation of α-lofoline. The detailed information of prototype, metabolite name, molecular weight, and molecular formula was given in Table 2.Table 2
Identification of the metabolites fromLycopodium clavatum in vivo.
NO. t R(min) Measured Mass (m/z) Metabolite Name Formula Error (ppm) Prototype M1 5.2 260.1653 demethylation C16H21NO2 1 lycojaponicumin C M2 6.95 306.2077 methylation C 18 H 27 N O 3 2.6 palhinine A M3 9.17 292.2287 methylation C 18 H 29 N O 2 3.7 (15R)-14,15-dihydroepilobscurinol M4 7.12 278.2127 methylation C 17 H 27 N O 2 2.6 lycodoline M5 3.57 294.2076 demethylation C 17 H 27 N O 3 2.4 α-lofoline


## 4. Conclusion

In this work, we demonstrated a systematic and reliable analytical method using UPLC–Q-TOF-MS coupled with multiple data processing approaches for rapidly screening and identifying the chemical constituents ofLycopodium clavatum both invitro and invivo. Invitro, 30 peaks were characterized in 75% ethanol extract ofLycopodium clavatum. Invivo, 17 peaks were characterized in rat plasma that including 12 prototype compounds and 5 metabolites. Methylation and demethylation are the main transformation reactions ofLycopodium clavatum in rat plasma. This work could be helpful to understand the complex compounds ofLycopodium clavatum and further analyze the pharmacological studies of active compounds.



---

*Source: 5165029-2019-07-02.xml*