# The Relationship between Diaspore Characteristics with Phylogeny, Life History Traits, and Their Ecological Adaptation of 150 Species from the Cold Desert of Northwest China

Authors: Hui-Liang Liu; Dao-Yuan Zhang; Shi-Min Duan; Xi-Yong Wang; Ming-Fang Song
Journal: The Scientific World Journal
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

Diaspore characteristics of 22 families, including 102 genera and 150 species (55 represented by seeds and 95 by fruits) from the Gurbantunggut Desert were analyzed for diaspore biological characteristics (mass, shape, color, and appendage type). The diaspore mass and shape were significantly different in phylogeny group (APG) and dispersal syndromes; vegetative periods significantly affected diaspore mass, but not diaspore shape; and ecotypes did not significantly affect diaspore mass and shape, but xerophyte species had larger diaspore mass than mesophyte species. Unique stepwise ANOVA results showed that variance in diaspore mass and shape among these 150 species was largely dependent upon phylogeny and dispersal syndromes. Therefore, it was suggested that phylogeny may constrain diaspore mass, and as dispersal syndromes may be related to phylogeny, they also constrained diaspore mass and shape. Diaspores of 85 species (56.67%) had appendages, including 26 with wings/bracts, 18 with pappus/hair, 14 with hooks/spines, 10 with awns, and 17 with other types of appendages. Different traits (mass, shape, color, appendage, and dispersal syndromes) of diaspore decided plants forming different adapted strategies in the desert. In summary, the diaspore characteristics were closely related with phylogeny, vegetative periods, dispersal syndromes, and ecotype, and these characteristics allowed the plants to adapt to extreme desert environments.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Heritable characteristics of seeds that contribute to seed and seedling survivorship under natural conditions are open to natural selection. Sexual reproduction can improve the success rate of breeding more than asexual reproduction for plants in the face of adversity, so in response to plant propagation, sexual reproduction is the focus of the study [1]. Seeds are a component of such a set; flower and fruit type, the type of placentation, the number of ovules per ovary, and the process of embryo development are traits that are generally evolutionarily conservative and strongly associated with family membership and seed mass [2]. Natural selection that maintains phenotypic constancy in these traits may preclude evolutionary change in seed mass if it is developmentally and genetically correlated with them. In any case, the strong taxonomic effect on seed mass suggests that there are factors other than the ecological features measured in this study that determine seed mass [3]. Diaspore mass and shape is a core characteristic in the life history of a plant [4]. Variation of the diaspores between or within species has important ecological and evolutionary significance [5]. Characteristics of diaspore can be used as an important basis for taxonomy. Many previous studies have shown that the type of plant diaspores and their morphological characteristics, such as mass, shape, color, and appendages, as well as fecundity pattern and postdispersal level, are closely related to their life-form, dispersal syndrome, reproductive strategy, seed germination, seedling settlement, and population distribution, in which seed mass and shape were effective in dispersal syndromes, dispersal distance, and longevity of the soil seed bank [6–9].A comparative study based on a large sample will enable ecologists to distinguish the main ways plants adapt to evolution and identify the plants with fitness (or lack of fitness) showing the physiological characteristics of life history in specific habitats [10]. Currently a study on a large sample of the diaspore characteristics in a same floristic has become a research hotspot of ecology, such as tropical wetlands in Venezuela [3, 6, 11], various habitats in Europe [12], New Zealand forests, and semiarid areas of Australia [7–9, 13], while the mainly focuses on the Inner Mongolia grassland and Horqin sandy in China [14–16] and the Qinghai-Tibet plateau alpine meadow communities [17, 18]. However, less information is available regarding on diaspore traits in the arid cold desert area in northwest China, but referred seed dispersal traits of 24 cruciferous short-lived plants [19].Information on seed dispersal of desert plants is crucial in order to understand adaptative strategies of plants in desert areas. Our aim in this study is to discuss (1) the relationship of biological characteristics with phylogeny group (APG), vegetative periods, dispersal syndromes, and ecotypes and (2) the relationship between biological characteristics and dispersal adaptation to the desert ecological environment. The study may utilize to further reveal the universal pattern of plant life history and reproductive strategies in this cold desert and ulteriorly understand the continuous mechanisms for desert vegetation, population-proliferation regime, weed invasion mechanisms, and biodiversity loss mechanisms. Therefore, it has a great significance in taxonomy, ecology, and evolutionary biology for studying other cold deserts.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Study Area and Species Traits

The cold desert is well-known due to it being located in colder areas with and higher latitude; and it is a dry, cold area of land that receives almost no precipitation. When it does, it is usually in the form of snow or fog [20]. The Gurbantunggut Desert ranged in latitude from 44°11′–46°20′ and longitude from 84°31′–90°00′, with an area of 4.88 × 104 km2; it is the second largest desert in China. It does not only contain the largest fixed and semifixed desert in the central region but also contains a salination desert in the southern edge, so it formed an abundant xerophytes and halophytes community [21]. This area is a typical inland temperate desert climate. In this area, the mean annual temperature is 7.3°C and the winter temperature could fall down to −20°C. The annual rainfall is very low in the summer, but there is significant snow in winter and spring (the largest number of snow thickness is between 20 and 30 cm) [22]. The stable wet sand layer by melting snow provides an important guarantee for plants survival and formation, so the species richness is relatively higher in this desert than other central deserts richness is relatively higher including 206 species [21]. Therefore, plant types with both short and long vegetative periods evolved. The natural vegetation in the desert is dominated by Haloxylon ammodendron and Haloxylon persicum [21]. Herbaceous plants are widespread and abundant in spring and early summer. Short-lived or ephemeral plants obtain certain development. Amaranthaceae is in a clearly dominant position while Brassicaceae, Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Poaceae, and so forth are common [21, 23, 24].


### 2.2. Composition of Materials

In this paper, 150 plant species were selected for the study and classified into 28 families and 102 genera, which accounted for 72.8% of species, 82.9% of genera, and 93.3% of family in this area. Among them, there was one gymnosperm (0.67%), 15 monocotyledon (10.00%), with dominant Poaceae (13 species, 8.67%), and 134 dicotyledon (89.33%), with dominant Amaranthaceae (38 species, 25.33%), Brassicaceae (20 species, 13.33%), and Asteraceae (14 species, 9.33%). They were divided into 10 APG II taxonomic phylogeny groups as follows [25]: Coniferopsida, Monocots, Commelinids, Eudicots, Core eudicots, Rosids, Eurosids I, Eurosids II, Euasterids I, and Euasterids II (Table 1).Table 1
The species, APG II taxonomic phylogeny group, family, vegetative period, metrical object, diaspore characteristics (length, width, height, shape (variance), color, appendages), first dispersal phase (dispersal syndrome), second dispersal phase, and ecotype of 150 species in the Gurbantunggut Desert, northwest China.
APG II taxonomic phylogeny group
Family
Species
Vegetative period
Metrical object
Mass of 100 seeds(Mean ± SE)
Length, width, and height(Mean ± SE)
Diaspore shape variance
Diaspore color
Appendages
First  dispersal phase (dispersal syndromes)
Second  dispersal phase
Ecotype
Coniferopsida
Ephedraceae
Ephedra przewalskii Stapf
S
Cone
280.86
±
7.06
3.926
±
0.054
1.700
±
0.051
0.854
±
0.054
0.114
Light brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Monocots
Liliaceae
Eremurus inderiensis (M. Bieb.) Regel
PH
Seed
820.62
±
5.85
5.766
±
0.125
3.454
±
0.089
2.788
±
0.073
0.052
Brown
Wing
Anemochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Iridaceae
Iris lactea Pall. var. chinensis (Fisch.) Koidz.
PH
Seed
2199.16
±
30.34
4.320
±
0.146
3.408
±
0.107
2.002
±
0.085
0.053
Reddish brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Commelinids
Poaceae
Achnatherum inebrians (Hance) Keng
PH
Seed
90.50
±
0.63
3.976
±
0.071
0.704
±
0.015
0.684
±
0.015
0.157
Brown
Hair
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Stipagrostis adscensionis L.
AH
Caryopsis
57.00
±
1.15
17.64
±
0.812
4.422
±
0.491
2.636
±
0.148
0.150
Brownish green
Awn
Zoochory
—
Xerophyte
Stipagrostis pennata Trin.
PH
Caryopsis
88.16
±
0.53
21.764
±
0.89
0
4.214
±
0.393
2.412
±
0.240
0.167
Yellowish green
Awn
Zoochory
—
Xerophyte
Chloris virgata Sw.
AH
Caryopsis
39.72
±
0.80
1.850
±
0.044
0.574
±
0.028
0.378
±
0.016
0.130
Pale yellow
Awn
Zoochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Eragrostis minor Host-E. poaeoides Beauv.
AE
Seed
7.58
±
0.24
0.584
±
0.021
0.440
±
0.017
0.372
±
0.017
0.028
Reddish brown
None
Anemochory
—
Mesophyte
Eremopyrum bonaepartis (Spreng.) Nevski
AE
Caryopsis
177.86
±
4.59
9.570
±
0.377
1.324
±
0.043
1.042
±
0.072
0.176
Yellowish green
Awn
Zoochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Eremopyrum triticeum (Gaertn.) Nevski
AE
Caryopsis
184.76
±
3.20
11.748
±
0.48
2
1.394
±
0.083
1.096
±
0.041
0.184
Yellowish green
Awn
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Elymus atratus Turcz.
PH
Caryopsis
155.82
±
1.37
19.574
±
1.02
1.394
±
0.065
0.652
±
0.034
0.206
Pale yellow
Awn
Zoochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Elymus sibiricus L.
PH
Caryopsis
221.22
±
4.19
15.372
±
0.966
1.466
±
0.066
0.638
±
0.025
0.199
Light green
Awn
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Leymus racemosus (Lam.) Tzvel.
PH
Caryopsis
944.44
±
14.73
13.708
±
0.872
2.736
±
0.230
2.166
±
0.157
0.156
Pale yellow
Awn
Zoochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Melica transsilvanica Schur
PH
Caryopsis
42.60
±
1.04
4.668
±
0.112
2.116
±
0.048
2.060
±
0.037
0.071
Pale yellow
Hair
Zoochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Stipa capillata L.
PH
Caryopsis
334.06
±
5.20
10.758
±
0.301
0.814
±
0.039
0.788
±
0.038
0.197
Pale yellow
Awn
Zoochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Stipa sareptana Beck.
PH
Caryopsis
367.18
±
2.76
12.512
±
0.369
0.710
±
0.028
0.676
±
0.030
0.205
Yellowish brown
Awn
Zoochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Eudicots
Papaveraceae
Corydalis stricta Steph.
PH
Seed
44.66
±
0.84
1.420
±
0.043
1.268
±
0.027
0.488
±
0.016
0.086
Black
Placenta
Barochory
—
Xerophyte
Glaucium squamigerum Kar. et Kir.
BPH
Seed
41.88
±
0.18
1.272
±
0.044
0.714
±
0.022
0.542
±
0.012
0.065
Black
None
Autochory
—
Xerophyte
Hypecoum erectum L.
AE
Seed
29.96
±
0.28
1.016
±
0.038
0.822
±
0.032
0.526
±
0.020
0.045
Dark brown
Wart
Barochory
—
Xerophyte
Ranunculaceae
Ceratocephalus testiculatus (Crantz) Bess.
AE
Achenecetum
106.46
±
0.99
4.614
±
0.229
4.548
±
0.276
3.600
±
0.180
0.018
Black
Beak/spine
Zoochory
—
Mesophyte
Clematis songarica Bge.
SS
Achene
234.84
±
11.31
4.038
±
0.106
1.800
±
0.044
0.654
±
0.023
0.126
Brown
Pappus
Anemochory
—
Mesophyte
Core eudicots
Caryophyllaceae
Gypsophila perfoliata L.
PH
Seed
31.06
±
0.45
0.944
±
0.010
0.784
±
0.023
0.460
±
0.009
0.048
Black
Wart
Barochory
—
Mesophyte
Amaranthaceae
Agriophyllum squarrosum (L.) Moq.
AH
Seed
115.82
±
2.70
2.208
±
0.093
1.712
±
0.074
0.524
±
0.040
0.108
White
None
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Anabasis aphylla L.
SS
Utricle
114.36
±
1.98
2.064
±
0.062
1.454
±
0.061
0.496
±
0.031
0.104
Dark reddish brown
Bract
Anemochory
—
Mesophyte
Atriplex aucheri Moq.
AH
Utricle
304.26
±
10.19
8.148
±
0.291
6.428
±
0.266
0.884
±
0.042
0.150
Light yellowish brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Atriplex tatarica L.
AH
Utricle
109.94
±
3.21
4.472
±
0.355
3.984
±
0.302
0.566
±
0.138
0.168
Yellowish brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Bassia dasyphylla (Fisch. et Mey.) O. Kuntze
AH
Utricle
66.32
±
0.78
3.018
±
0.145
2.692
±
0.115
0.444
±
0.021
0.150
Light yellowish brown
Spine
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Bassia Sedoides (Pall.) O. Kuntze
AH
Utricle
42.98
±
0.49
2.958
±
0.165
2.216
±
0.157
1.710
±
0.162
0.040
Yellowish brown
Hook/spine
Zoochory
—
Xerophyte
Camphorosma monspeliaca L.
SS
Utricle
53.58
±
1.45
2.238
±
0.066
1.350
±
0.039
0.708
±
0.034
0.083
Yellowish brown
Hair
Anemochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Ceratocarpus arenarius L.
AH
Utricle
151.14
±
2.49
7.624
±
0.556
10.484
±
1.246
0.534
±
0.028
0.364
Dark green/pale yellow
Spine
Zoochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Ceratoides ewersmanniana (Stschel. ex Losinsk.) Botsch. et Ikonn.
S
Utricle
330.64
±
4.65
7.272
±
0.566
8.794
±
0.790
3.680
±
0.344
0.179
Brown
Hair
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Ceratoides lateens (J. F. Gmel.) Reveal et Holmgren
S/SS
Utricle
434.80
±
14.25
7.066
±
0.371
8.018
±
0.399
4.398
±
0.206
0.076
Brown
Hair
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Chenopodium acuminatum Willd.
AH
Seed
35.22
±
0.16
0.964
±
0.025
0.868
±
0.024
0.416
±
0.021
0.065
Black
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Chenopodium aristatum Linn.
AH
Seed
10.66
±
0.22
0.594
±
0.023
0.548
±
0.024
0.340
±
0.018
0.037
Black
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Chenopodium glaucum Linn.
AH
Seed
21.58
±
0.21
0.864
±
0.049
0.798
±
0.051
0.342
±
0.013
0.074
Black
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Corispermum lehmannianum Bunge.
AH
Utricle
73.10
±
1.01
2.634
±
0.083
1.708
±
0.077
0.266
±
0.016
0.143
Yellowish green
Beak
Zoochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Halogeton arachnoideus Moq.
AH
Seed
43.88
±
0.92
1.346
±
0.061
1.102
±
0.045
0.390
±
0.017
0.095
Dark brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Halogeton glomeratus (Bieb.) C. A. Mey.
AH
Seed
105.98
±
1.12
2.092
±
0.047
1.388
±
0.034
0.604
±
0.015
0.088
Yellowish brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Halostachys caspica (Bieb.) C. A. Mey.
S
Utricle
24.24
±
0.74
1.798
±
0.077
1.366
±
0.060
0.920
±
0.057
0.046
Brown
None
Anemochory
—
Mesophyte
Haloxylon ammodendron (C. A. M.) Bge.
SA
Utricle
388.80
±
11.50
10.676
±
0.419
9.548
±
0.389
0.986
±
0.091
0.172
Yellowish brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Haloxylon persicum Bge. ex Boiss. et Buhse
SA
Utricle
797.18
±
8.45
9.528
±
0.149
8.820
±
0.122
1.608
±
0.119
0.147
Light yellowish brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Horaninowia ulicina Fisch. et Mey.
AH
Utricle
23.00
±
0.57
0.932
±
0.043
0.830
±
0.043
0.332
±
0.014
0.083
Pale yellow
Bract
Zoochory
—
Mesophyte
Kalidium capsicum (L.) Ung.-Sternb.
SS
Utricle
15.12
±
0.20
0.728
±
0.029
0.642
±
0.026
0.452
±
0.022
0.032
Light yellowish brown
None
Anemochory
—
Mesophyte
Kalidium cuspidatum (Ung.-Sternb.) Grub.
SS
Utricle
11.90
±
0.38
1.680
±
0.127
1.336
±
0.029
0.608
±
0.040
0.081
Light yellowish brown
None
Anemochory
—
Mesophyte
Kalidium foliatum (Pall.) G Moq.
SS
Utricle
16.06
±
0.65
1.270
±
0.121
0.938
±
0.141
0.770
±
0.081
0.047
Light yellowish brown
None
Anemochory
—
Mesophyte
Kochia iranica Litv. ex Bornm.
AH
Utricle
47.34
±
0.80
1.568
±
0.080
1.188
±
0.044
0.910
±
0.050
0.037
Dark brown
Hair
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Petrosmonia sibirica (Pall.) Bge.
AH
Utricle
174.96
±
1.51
3.712
±
0.213
1.988
±
0.030
0.874
±
0.039
0.104
Pale yellow
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Salicornia europaea Linn.
AH
Utricle
5.54
±
0.04
0.698
±
0.017
0.430
±
0.017
0.350
±
0.017
0.049
Dark brown
None
Anemochory
—
Xerophyte
Salsola affinis C. A. Mey.
AH
Utricle
626.96
±
15.51
8.032
±
0.408
7.106
±
0.347
3.174
±
0.140
0.072
Yellowish brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Salsola foliosa (L.) Schrad.
AH
Utricle
103.94
±
0.40
6.162
±
0.218
5.834
±
0.214
0.524
±
0.020
0.182
Reddish brown
Bract
Anemochory
—
Xerophyte
Salsola heptapotamica Iljin
AH
Utricle
518.34
±
6.87
10.176
±
0.596
9.210
±
0.525
1.874
±
0.183
0.139
Yellowish brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Salsola nitraria Pall.
AH
Utricle
180.20
±
3.96
6.690
±
0.269
5.958
±
0.290
1.668
±
0.126
0.115
Yellowish brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Salsola ruthenica Iljin
AH
Utricle
271.46
±
4.11
8.216
±
0.424
7.556
±
0.397
1.748
±
0.109
0.129
Brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Salsola subcrassa M. Pop.
AH
Utricle
1071.36
±
2.37
10.770
±
0.578
9.694
±
0.509
2.584
±
0.120
0.117
Yellowish brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Suaeda acuminata (C. A. Mey.) Moq.
AH
Utricle
56.88
±
1.67
1.456
±
0.088
1.264
±
0.071
1.020
±
0.056
0.020
Dark brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Suaeda altissima (L.) Pall.
AH
Utricle
34.74
±
0.57
1.244
±
0.033
1.076
±
0.046
0.768
±
0.033
0.029
Black
None
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Suaeda corniculata (C. A. Mey.) Bunge
AH
Utricle
33.79
±
0.58
1.102
±
0.026
0.924
±
0.026
0.580
±
0.021
0.047
Yellowish brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Suaeda microphylla (C. A. M.) Pall.
SS
Utricle
31.66
±
0.51
1.086
±
0.040
1.040
±
0.039
0.964
±
0.033
0.003
Black/yellowish brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Suaeda physophora Pall.
SS
Utricle
247.52
±
2.11
2.934
±
0.162
2.724
±
0.120
1.870
±
0.088
0.029
Reddish brown
Perianth
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Suaeda salsa (L.) Pall.
AH
Utricle
15.20
±
0.28
0.792
±
0.031
0.726
±
0.036
0.466
±
0.020
0.034
Black
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Polygonaceae
Atraphaxis frutescens (Rgl.) Krassn.
S
Achene
283.68
±
6.26
7.596
±
0.096
5.322
±
0.174
3.326
±
0.226
0.058
Brown
Perianth
Anemochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Calligonum ebinuricum Ivanova.
S
Achene
2672.20
±
121.39
10.138
±
0.369
6.614
±
0.521
5.738
±
0.437
0.045
Brown
Hook/spine
Zoochory
—
Mesophyte
Calligonum mongolicum Turcz.
SS
Achene
5934.84
±
57.75
14.056
±
0.538
12.604
±
0.390
12.454
±
0.398
0.005
Yellowish brown
Hook/spine
Zoochory
—
Xerophyte
Calligonum  leucocladum (Schrenk) Bunge
S
Achene
2829.50
±
124.68
10.614
±
0.423
10.250
±
1.378
8.240
±
1.235
0.087
Yellowish brown
Wing
Zoochory
—
Xerophyte
Rumex pseudonatronatus Borb.
PH
Achene
211.74
±
4.07
4.614
±
0.229
4.548
±
0.276
3.600
±
0.180
0.018
Yellowish brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Tamaricaceae
Reaumuria soongorica (Pall.) Maxim.
SS
Capsule
916.18
±
12.07
6.050
±
0.156
2.568
±
0.064
2.500
±
0.058
0.078
Dark brown
Hair
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Plumbaginaceae
Limonium coralloides (Tausch) Lincz.
PH
Utricle
26.40
±
0.63
2.622
±
0.048
1.424
±
0.049
1.390
±
0.050
0.051
Light brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Limonium gmelinii (Willd.) Kuntze.
PH
Utricle
45.50
±
1.22
3.532
±
0.090
1.324
±
0.062
1.288
±
0.063
0.093
Dark brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Limonium otolepis (Schrenk)
PH
Utricle
21.40
±
0.42
1.984
±
0.088
0.972
±
0.023
0.944
±
0.020
0.064
Light brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Limonium suffruticosum (L.) Kuntze.
SS
Utricle
30.26
±
0.52
2.784
±
0.157
0.896
±
0.066
0.868
±
0.067
0.109
Light brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Rosids
Geraniaceae
Erodium oxyrrhynchum M. B. Fl.
AE
Capsule
225.44
±
2.55
5.366
±
0.119
1.086
±
0.092
0.902
±
0.014
0.154
Brown
Pappus/beak
Anemochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Eurosids I
Fabaceae
Alhagi sparsifolia Shap.
SS
Pod
487.46
±
6.42
3.672
±
0.129
2.292
±
0.073
1.230
±
0.079
0.078
Brown
None
Autochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Amorpha fruticosa L.
S/SS
Pod
911.84
±
9.71
8.616
±
0.251
2.836
±
0.050
1.628
±
0.056
0.130
Nut-brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Eremosparton songoricum (Litv) Vass
SS
Pod
1547.34
±
26.08
4.402
±
0.129
3.358
±
0.067
1.266
±
0.044
0.091
Light yellowish brown
Awn, papery calyx
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Glycyrrhiza inflata Batal.
PH
Pod
3790.04
±
53.64
11.424
±
0.639
4.920
±
0.250
3.688
±
0.141
0.091
Brown
None
Autochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch
PH
Seed
903.80
±
5.98
2.796
±
0.151
2.301
±
0.061
1.534
±
0.038
0.038
Brown
None
Autochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Sophora alopecuroides L.
PH
Seed
1899.66
±
19.49
3.968
±
0.074
2.936
±
0.078
2.150
±
0.081
0.039
Light brown
None
Barochory
—
Xerophyte
Trigonella arcuata C. A. M.
AE
Seed
100.78
±
1.76
2.248
±
0.059
0.832
±
0.028
0.656
±
0.028
0.105
Yellowish green
None
Autochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Trigonella cancellata Desf.
AE
Seed
87.84
±
0.96
2.100
±
0.030
0.768
±
0.037
0.596
±
0.030
0.107
Yellowish green
None
Autochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Zygophyllaceae
Nitraria roborowskii Kom.
S
Berry
4599.56
±
91.07
7.916
±
0.174
4.598
±
0.281
3.616
±
0.137
0.059
Dark reddish brown
None
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Nitraria sibirica Pall.
S
Berry
3826.70
±
59.66
6.758
±
0.130
3.532
±
0.089
3.384
±
0.084
0.055
Dark reddish brown
None
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Peganum harmala Linn.
PH
Seed
289.36
±
2.84
3.360
±
0.046
1.832
±
0.079
0.908
±
0.041
0.096
Dark brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Zygophyllum fabago L.
PH
Seed
297.76
±
9.15
3.704
±
0.045
1.674
±
0.056
0.634
±
0.032
0.123
Brown
Balloon
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Zygophyllum pterocarpum Bge.
PH
Seed
170.24
±
4.38
3.476
±
0.089
1.884
±
0.056
0.360
±
0.016
0.140
Brown
Wart
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Zygophyllum xanthoxylon Maxim.
S
Capsule
10652.78
±
292.29
28.588
±
1.133
26.336
±
1.051
15.058
±
1.390
0.051
Pale yellow
Wing
Anemochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Rosaceae
Agrimonia asiatica Juz.
PH
Achenecetum
463.34
±
9.21
5.456
±
0.149
3.316
±
0.161
3.012
±
0.194
0.044
Green
Hook/spine
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Cannabaceae
Cannabis sativa L.
AH
Capsule
433.82
±
46.22
3.016
±
0.089
2.284
±
0.085
1.660
±
0.042
0.036
Grey
None
Barochory
—
Mesophyte
Eurosids II
Brassicaceae
Alyssum deserorum Stapf.
AE
Seed
37.32
±
0.50
1.474
±
0.043
1.044
±
0.044
0.334
±
0.013
0.107
Yellow
None
Ombro-hydrochory
—
Mesophyte
Alyssum linifolium Steph. ex Willd.
AE
Seed
18.00
±
0.29
1.330
±
0.030
0.902
±
0.033
0.274
±
0.018
0.111
Yellow
None
Ombro-hydrochory
—
Xerophyte
Camelina microcarpa Andrz.
AH
Seed
31.66
±
0.24
1.164
±
0.039
0.702
±
0.033
0.492
±
0.024
0.062
Yellowish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
—
Xerophyte
Camelina sativa (Linn.) Crantz
AH
Seed
31.90
±
0.83
1.114
±
0.028
0.614
±
0.019
0.502
±
0.024
0.061
Yellowish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
—
Mesophyte
Cardaria draba (L.) Desv.
PH
Seed
206.44
±
0.68
2.104
±
0.035
1.274
±
0.059
0.828
±
0.028
0.068
Reddish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Cardaria pubescens (C. A. Meyer) Jarmoenko
PH
Seed
94.80
±
1.30
1.670
±
0.046
1.050
±
0.027
0.620
±
0.021
0.070
Reddish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Descurainia Sophia (L.) Webb. ex Prantl
AH
Seed
10.60
±
0.07
0.916
±
0.025
0.422
±
0.011
0.336
±
0.013
0.081
Light reddish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Erysimum hieracifolium L.
BPH
Seed
29.22
±
0.34
1.324
±
0.063
0.620
±
0.025
0.430
±
0.020
0.091
Brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Euclidium syricum (L.) R. Br.
AE
Silicle
400.92
±
6.52
3.740
±
0.163
1.898
±
0.051
1.630
±
0.040
0.066
Brownish green/brown
Beak
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Isatis costata C. A. Mey.
BH
Silicle
394.58
±
24.67
8.708
±
0.430
3.904
±
0.299
1.332
±
0.079
0.129
Yellowish brown
Wing
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Isatis violascens Bge.
AE
Silicle
223.52
±
3.15
3.038
±
0.115
1.220
±
0.028
0.972
±
0.024
0.095
Yellowish brown
Wing
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Lepidium apetalum Willd.
ABH
Seed
18.00
±
0.13
1.016
±
0.023
0.620
±
0.022
0.362
±
0.020
0.074
Reddish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Lepidium ferganense Korsh.
PH
Seed
21.34
±
0.52
1.360
±
0.022
0.684
±
0.022
0.312
±
0.015
0.106
Reddish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
—
Mesophyte
Lepidium latifolium var. affine C. A. Mey
PH
Seed
15.22
±
0.36
0.930
±
0.026
0.544
±
0.023
0.336
±
0.015
0.074
Reddish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
—
Mesophyte
Lepidium perfoliatum L.
ABE
Seed
78.32
±
0.26
1.878
±
0.042
1.188
±
0.041
0.446
±
0.015
0.102
Yellowish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Malcolmia africana (L.) R. Br.
BE
Seed
13.64
±
0.00
1.024
±
0.040
0.567
±
0.038
0.360
±
0.017
0.080
Light yellowish brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Neotorularia korolkovii (Rgl. et Schmlh.) Hedge et J. Leonard.
ABE
Seed
9.46
±
0.11
0.966
±
0.037
0.448
±
0.026
0.200
±
0.026
0.117
Yellowish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
—
Mesophyte
Syrenia siliculosa (M. Bieb.) Andrz.
BH
Seed
20.94
±
0.39
1.588
±
0.090
0.678
±
0.026
0.420
±
0.015
0.103
Orange
None
Ombro-hydrochory
—
Xerophyte
Tetracme quadricornis (Steph.) Bge.
AE
Seed
8.00
±
0.11
0.880
±
0.024
0.458
±
0.011
0.284
±
0.016
0.086
Light yellowish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
—
Mesophyte
Thlaspi arvense L.
AE
Seed
74.26
±
0.46
1.598
±
0.034
1.102
±
0.016
0.592
±
0.022
0.070
Dark brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Malvaceae
Abutilon theophrasti Medicus
AH
Seed
858.18
±
6.37
3.396
±
0.063
2.756
±
0.035
1.544
±
0.029
0.054
Dark brown
Hair
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Althaea officinalis L.
PH
Schizocarp
153.88
±
2.99
2.756
±
0.053
2.352
±
0.042
1.292
±
0.154
0.062
Light brown
Hair
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Althaea nudiflora Lindl.
BH
Schizocarp
593.78
±
8.71
4.732
±
0.120
4.004
±
0.046
1.168
±
0.069
0.111
Light brown
Hair
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Hibiscus trionum L.
AH
Seed
454.08
±
5.71
2.276
±
0.039
2.032
±
0.036
1.392
±
0.027
0.028
Black
Wart
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Euasterids I
Scrophulariaceae
Dodartia orientalis L.
PH
Seed
8.72
±
0.15
0.516
±
0.009
0.356
±
0.008
0.324
±
0.009
0.028
Black
None
Barochory
—
Mesophyte
Leptorhabdos parviflora Benth.
AH
Seed
111.26
±
1.11
2.540
±
0.103
1.096
±
0.064
0.588
±
0.024
0.111
Dark brown
None
Barochory
—
Mesophyte
Veronica ferganiea M Pop.
AE
Seed
40.60
±
0.65
1.458
±
0.042
0.722
±
0.029
0.522
±
0.029
0.081
Brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Solanaceae
Datura stramonium L.
SS
Seed
691.98
±
5.76
3.304
±
0.046
2.608
±
0.051
1.316
±
0.040
0.065
Black
None
Barochory
—
Xerophyte
Hyoscyamus niger L.
BH
Seed
62.94
±
0.97
1.294
±
0.027
1.086
±
0.035
0.594
±
0.025
0.057
Yellowish brown
None
Barochory
—
Xerophyte
Boraginaceae
Arnebia decumbens (Vent.) Coss. et Kral.
AE
Nutlet
1335.44
±
11.70
10.690
±
0.345
6.384
±
0.332
5.360
±
0.164
0.052
Brown
Hook/spine
Zoochory
—
Xerophyte
Heliotropium ellipticum Ldb.
PH
Schizocarp
95.82
±
1.27
2.022
±
0.145
1.260
±
0.077
0.998
±
0.055
0.049
Brownish green
Wart
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Lappula myosotis Moench
ABE
Nutlet
435.18
±
2.71
4.354
±
0.144
3.432
±
0.150
3.154
±
0.146
0.021
Dark brown
Spine
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Lappula spinocarpa (Forssk.) Aschers. ex Kuntze
AE
Nutlet
1491.06
±
57.20
3.924
±
0.065
3.118
±
0.037
4.112
±
0.139
0.016
Light yellowish brown
Spine
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Lepechiniella lasiocarpa W. T. Wang
AH
Nutlet
451.48
±
4.14
2.860
±
0.107
2.778
±
0.101
2.606
±
0.126
0.015
Brown
Spine
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Lindelofia stylosa (Kar. et Kir.) Brand.
PH
Nutlet
1397.80
±
28.88
6.768
±
0.069
4.648
±
0.083
2.248
±
0.044
0.078
Yellowish brown
Spine
Zoochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Lamiaceae
Elsholtzia densa Benth.
PH
Nutlet
10.02
±
0.09
0.688
±
0.010
0.508
±
0.020
0.468
±
0.018
0.023
Dark brown
Wart
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Leonurus turkestanicus V. Krecz. et Rupr.
PH
Nutlet
111.60
±
0.56
2.364
±
0.038
1.396
±
0.060
0.720
±
0.046
0.086
Light brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Marrubium vulgare L.
PH
Nutlet
99.34
±
0.55
1.784
±
0.055
1.060
±
0.038
0.724
±
0.015
0.066
Dark brown
Wart
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Phlomis chinghoensis C. Y. Wu
PH
Nutlet
556.84
±
8.71
4.268
±
0.083
2.380
±
0.074
1.280
±
0.340
0.087
Dark brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Salvia deserta Schang.
PH
Nutlet
51.58
±
1.24
1.576
±
0.030
1.164
±
0.033
0.700
±
0.025
0.055
Black
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Plantaginaceae
Plantago lessingii Fisch. et Mey.
AE
Seed
193.74
±
2.13
3.514
±
0.064
1.328
±
0.059
0.610
±
0.041
0.129
Yellowish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Plantago major L.
PH
Seed
17.66
±
0.38
1.132
±
0.049
0.656
±
0.015
0.372
±
0.016
0.080
Yellowish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Plantago maritima Linn. subsp. ciliata Printz.
PH
Seed
44.06
±
0.57
1.756
±
0.054
0.824
±
0.044
0.426
±
0.023
0.105
Yellowish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Plantago minuta Pall.
AE
Seed
203.80
±
5.43
3.534
±
0.090
1.366
±
0.033
0.586
±
0.017
0.129
Dark brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Convolvulaceae
Cuscuta australis R. Br.
AH
Seed
77.36
±
3.33
1.260
±
0.048
1.028
±
0.038
0.732
±
0.026
0.031
Light brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Rubiaceae
Galium rivale (Sibth. et Smith) Griseb.
PH
Seed
35.44
±
0.13
1.056
±
0.031
0.728
±
0.022
0.592
±
0.037
0.041
Dark brown
Wart
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Euasterids II
Campanulaceae
Codonopsis clematidea (Schrenk) C. B. Clarke
PH
Seed
50.18
±
0.41
1.384
±
0.036
0.636
±
0.027
0.584
±
0.027
0.074
Light brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Asteraceae
Arctium lappa L.
BH
Achene
1153.06
±
9.95
6.272
±
0.063
2.556
±
0.089
1.320
±
0.022
0.117
Brown
Pappus
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Arctium tomentosum Mill.
BH
Achene
931.96
±
13.94
5.412
±
0.028
2.376
±
0.076
1.324
±
0.030
0.107
Brown
Pappus
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Artemisia annua L.
AH
Achene
5.00
±
0.14
1.208
±
0.016
0.384
±
0.017
0.308
±
0.021
0.119
Light brown
None
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Artemisia ordosica Krasch
SS
Achenecetum
245.66
±
4.02
1.546
±
0.033
0.572
±
0.022
0.370
±
0.014
0.115
Brown
None
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Cancrinia discoidea (Ledeb.) Poljak.
BH
Achene
21.74
±
0.29
2.932
±
0.175
0.908
±
0.027
0.878
±
0.022
0.111
Pale yellow
Pappus
Anemochory
—
Xerophyte
Centaurea squarosa Willd.
BPH
Achenecetum
1860.14
±
30.25
9.638
±
0.294
5.160
±
0.087
5.016
±
0.137
0.053
Pale yellow
Hook/spine
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Cichorium intybus L.
PH
Achene
93.22
±
2.10
2.988
±
0.044
1.140
±
0.065
0.552
±
0.044
0.127
Yellowish brown
Pappus
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Cousinia affinis Schrenk
PH
Achene
424.78
±
4.07
4.876
±
0.196
2.560
±
0.077
1.384
±
0.052
0.093
Greyish black
Hook/spine
Zoochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Garhadiolus papposus Boiss. et Buhse
AE
Achene
230.00
±
2.94
5.904
±
0.205
3.158
±
0.113
1.114
±
0.076
0.116
Light yellowish brown
Pappus/beak
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Koelpinia linearis Pall.
AE
Achene
552.36
±
3.95
10.262
±
0.329
6.682
±
0.293
2.244
±
0.217
0.111
Brown
Hook/spine
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Neopallasia pectinata (Pall.) Poljak.
AH
Achene
33.70
±
1.83
1.628
±
0.047
0.758
±
0.021
0.320
±
0.012
0.116
Dark brown
None
Anemochory
—
Mesophyte
Onopordum acanthium L.
BH
Achene
982.10
±
7.56
4.852
±
0.053
2.556
±
0.039
1.410
±
0.034
0.090
Grey/greyish black
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Saussurea salsa (Pall.) Spreng.
PH
Achene
129.22
±
4.70
3.522
±
0.134
1.302
±
0.053
0.712
±
0.047
0.123
Greyish white
Pappus
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Xanthium mongolicum Kitag.
AH
Achene
19317.88
±
131.28
22.088
±
0.579
13.344
±
0.219
12.596
±
0.332
0.040
Yellowish green/green
Beak/hook/spine
Zoochory
—
Mesophyte
Apiaceae
Conium maculatum L.
BH
Schizocarp
278.92
±
8.04
2.852
±
0.069
1.540
±
0.013
1.104
±
0.044
0.071
Light yellowish brown
None
Barochory
—
Mesophyte
Soranthus meyeri Ledeb.
PH
Schizocarp
189.68
±
1.07
4.492
±
0.156
3.366
±
0.158
0.806
±
0.070
0.130
Pale yellow
None
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Notes: AH: annuals; ABH: annuals/biennials; BH: biennials; BPH: biennials/perennials; PH: perennials; S: shrubs; SS: semishrubs; SA: small arbor; AE: annuals ephemerals; ABE: annuals/biennials ephemerals; BE: biennial ephemerals.Plant types with both short and long vegetative periods were evolved in this area [24] and short (ephemeral) plants included annuals, ainnuals/biennials, and biennials herb, so vegetative periods were divided into annuals (AH), annuals/biennials (ABH), biennials (BH), biennials/perennials (BPH), perennials (PH), shrubs (S), semishrubs (SS), small arbor (SA), annuals ephemerals (AE), annuals/biennials ephemerals (ABE), and biennial ephemerals (BE) (Table 1).Ecotypes were divided into 2 categories: xerophyte (67 species, 44.67%) and mesophyte (83 species, 55.33%) (Table1).


### 2.3. Study Methods on Morphology Characteristics and Dispersal Syndromes

#### 2.3.1. Morphology Characteristics

Metrical objects of 150 species could be divided into seeds (55 species) and fruits (95 species), which could be further divided into various types.(1)
Mass: With reference to Thompson’s method [26], we randomly selected 100 seeds or fruits in each species, measuring the weight (g) with fine balance (Sartorius BS110S, accuracy to 0.0001 g). Each species had five repeats, and then we took the average value and calculated the standard error. If the appendages were valuable for dispersal, we measured including them.
(2)
Shape: according to Thompson et al.’s methods [26], the seed shape was calculated as the variance of the three main perpendicular dimensions after dividing all values by length. Totally spherical seeds would have shape = 0, with this value increasing as they became flatter or elongated. In other words, larger values of variance were associated with flatter seeds; smaller variance indicated more round seeds. According to the three-dimensional mean variance, we classified them into seven grades and calculated the frequency of occurrence (percentage) at each grade. Finally, combining observation and [6, 23], we determined the shape of each species and calculated the frequency (percentage) of each shape group.
(3)
Color: combining observation and [6, 23], we can determine the diaspore color of each species and calculate the frequency (percentage) of each color group.
(4)
Appendage: We observed and recorded the appendage features, such as wing/bract, pappus/hair, hook/spine, awn, or other kinds of appendages (such as style/perianth/beak/warts/placenta, etc.).


#### 2.3.2. Dispersal Syndromes

Because seed dispersal was divided into two phases. (1) Phase I dispersal represents the movement of the seeds from the parent plant to a surface, each of 150 study species were assigned to one of five dispersal syndromes in their primal dispersal phase, on the basis of data from field collections, observing seed ornamentation and appendages and descriptions from published flora [27–29]. ① Zoochorous species are defined as having awns, spines, or hooks to adhere to animals (epizoochory) or seed with fleshly or arillate fruits for animals to eat (endochory); ② anemochorous species are defined as having membranous wings, bracts, perianth, balloon, hair, or dust seed (<0.01 mg); ③ autochorous species are divided into ballistically dispersed species possessing explosively dehiscing capsules by wind and by wetting that throw the seeds some distance from the parent plant; ④ barochorous species are defined as those lacking any obvious dispersal mechanism or disperser reward; and ⑤ ombrohydrochory dispersed species are defined as the seeds producing a mucilage upon being wetted (Table 1). (2) Phase II dispersal includes both horizontal and vertical movement of the seeds after arrival on the surface until it is lodged or germinated. Though many species are subject to secondary dispersal by animals (major ants (myrmecochory), indicated by the presence of an elaiosome or an appendage on seeds that is attractive to ants) or water, for the purpose of this analysis it was examined only the primary phase of dispersal. Meanwhile, ants as a mass of predators, the seeds were divided to secondary dispersal type.


### 2.4. Data Analysis

SPSS 15.0 was used for calculating the mean and the standard error of data. The ANOVA method (SPSS 15.0) was applied to analyze the significant difference between the diaspore mass (weight)/shape in different APG, vegetative periods, ecotypes, and dispersal syndromes. To examine differences in diaspore mass and shape among vegetative periods and taxonomic class rank, we used the Kruskal-Wallis test (K-W) after categorization of the variables. The association between nominal traits was determined with the Pearson x
2 test-statistic. Correlations between quantitative traits were examined using Pearson correlation coefficient. Diaspore mass was log-transformed prior to statistical analysis. One-way analysis of variance ANOVA was applied after verifying the homogeneity of variance by Levene’s test.


## 2.1. Study Area and Species Traits

The cold desert is well-known due to it being located in colder areas with and higher latitude; and it is a dry, cold area of land that receives almost no precipitation. When it does, it is usually in the form of snow or fog [20]. The Gurbantunggut Desert ranged in latitude from 44°11′–46°20′ and longitude from 84°31′–90°00′, with an area of 4.88 × 104 km2; it is the second largest desert in China. It does not only contain the largest fixed and semifixed desert in the central region but also contains a salination desert in the southern edge, so it formed an abundant xerophytes and halophytes community [21]. This area is a typical inland temperate desert climate. In this area, the mean annual temperature is 7.3°C and the winter temperature could fall down to −20°C. The annual rainfall is very low in the summer, but there is significant snow in winter and spring (the largest number of snow thickness is between 20 and 30 cm) [22]. The stable wet sand layer by melting snow provides an important guarantee for plants survival and formation, so the species richness is relatively higher in this desert than other central deserts richness is relatively higher including 206 species [21]. Therefore, plant types with both short and long vegetative periods evolved. The natural vegetation in the desert is dominated by Haloxylon ammodendron and Haloxylon persicum [21]. Herbaceous plants are widespread and abundant in spring and early summer. Short-lived or ephemeral plants obtain certain development. Amaranthaceae is in a clearly dominant position while Brassicaceae, Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Poaceae, and so forth are common [21, 23, 24].


## 2.2. Composition of Materials

In this paper, 150 plant species were selected for the study and classified into 28 families and 102 genera, which accounted for 72.8% of species, 82.9% of genera, and 93.3% of family in this area. Among them, there was one gymnosperm (0.67%), 15 monocotyledon (10.00%), with dominant Poaceae (13 species, 8.67%), and 134 dicotyledon (89.33%), with dominant Amaranthaceae (38 species, 25.33%), Brassicaceae (20 species, 13.33%), and Asteraceae (14 species, 9.33%). They were divided into 10 APG II taxonomic phylogeny groups as follows [25]: Coniferopsida, Monocots, Commelinids, Eudicots, Core eudicots, Rosids, Eurosids I, Eurosids II, Euasterids I, and Euasterids II (Table 1).Table 1
The species, APG II taxonomic phylogeny group, family, vegetative period, metrical object, diaspore characteristics (length, width, height, shape (variance), color, appendages), first dispersal phase (dispersal syndrome), second dispersal phase, and ecotype of 150 species in the Gurbantunggut Desert, northwest China.
APG II taxonomic phylogeny group
Family
Species
Vegetative period
Metrical object
Mass of 100 seeds(Mean ± SE)
Length, width, and height(Mean ± SE)
Diaspore shape variance
Diaspore color
Appendages
First  dispersal phase (dispersal syndromes)
Second  dispersal phase
Ecotype
Coniferopsida
Ephedraceae
Ephedra przewalskii Stapf
S
Cone
280.86
±
7.06
3.926
±
0.054
1.700
±
0.051
0.854
±
0.054
0.114
Light brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Monocots
Liliaceae
Eremurus inderiensis (M. Bieb.) Regel
PH
Seed
820.62
±
5.85
5.766
±
0.125
3.454
±
0.089
2.788
±
0.073
0.052
Brown
Wing
Anemochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Iridaceae
Iris lactea Pall. var. chinensis (Fisch.) Koidz.
PH
Seed
2199.16
±
30.34
4.320
±
0.146
3.408
±
0.107
2.002
±
0.085
0.053
Reddish brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Commelinids
Poaceae
Achnatherum inebrians (Hance) Keng
PH
Seed
90.50
±
0.63
3.976
±
0.071
0.704
±
0.015
0.684
±
0.015
0.157
Brown
Hair
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Stipagrostis adscensionis L.
AH
Caryopsis
57.00
±
1.15
17.64
±
0.812
4.422
±
0.491
2.636
±
0.148
0.150
Brownish green
Awn
Zoochory
—
Xerophyte
Stipagrostis pennata Trin.
PH
Caryopsis
88.16
±
0.53
21.764
±
0.89
0
4.214
±
0.393
2.412
±
0.240
0.167
Yellowish green
Awn
Zoochory
—
Xerophyte
Chloris virgata Sw.
AH
Caryopsis
39.72
±
0.80
1.850
±
0.044
0.574
±
0.028
0.378
±
0.016
0.130
Pale yellow
Awn
Zoochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Eragrostis minor Host-E. poaeoides Beauv.
AE
Seed
7.58
±
0.24
0.584
±
0.021
0.440
±
0.017
0.372
±
0.017
0.028
Reddish brown
None
Anemochory
—
Mesophyte
Eremopyrum bonaepartis (Spreng.) Nevski
AE
Caryopsis
177.86
±
4.59
9.570
±
0.377
1.324
±
0.043
1.042
±
0.072
0.176
Yellowish green
Awn
Zoochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Eremopyrum triticeum (Gaertn.) Nevski
AE
Caryopsis
184.76
±
3.20
11.748
±
0.48
2
1.394
±
0.083
1.096
±
0.041
0.184
Yellowish green
Awn
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Elymus atratus Turcz.
PH
Caryopsis
155.82
±
1.37
19.574
±
1.02
1.394
±
0.065
0.652
±
0.034
0.206
Pale yellow
Awn
Zoochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Elymus sibiricus L.
PH
Caryopsis
221.22
±
4.19
15.372
±
0.966
1.466
±
0.066
0.638
±
0.025
0.199
Light green
Awn
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Leymus racemosus (Lam.) Tzvel.
PH
Caryopsis
944.44
±
14.73
13.708
±
0.872
2.736
±
0.230
2.166
±
0.157
0.156
Pale yellow
Awn
Zoochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Melica transsilvanica Schur
PH
Caryopsis
42.60
±
1.04
4.668
±
0.112
2.116
±
0.048
2.060
±
0.037
0.071
Pale yellow
Hair
Zoochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Stipa capillata L.
PH
Caryopsis
334.06
±
5.20
10.758
±
0.301
0.814
±
0.039
0.788
±
0.038
0.197
Pale yellow
Awn
Zoochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Stipa sareptana Beck.
PH
Caryopsis
367.18
±
2.76
12.512
±
0.369
0.710
±
0.028
0.676
±
0.030
0.205
Yellowish brown
Awn
Zoochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Eudicots
Papaveraceae
Corydalis stricta Steph.
PH
Seed
44.66
±
0.84
1.420
±
0.043
1.268
±
0.027
0.488
±
0.016
0.086
Black
Placenta
Barochory
—
Xerophyte
Glaucium squamigerum Kar. et Kir.
BPH
Seed
41.88
±
0.18
1.272
±
0.044
0.714
±
0.022
0.542
±
0.012
0.065
Black
None
Autochory
—
Xerophyte
Hypecoum erectum L.
AE
Seed
29.96
±
0.28
1.016
±
0.038
0.822
±
0.032
0.526
±
0.020
0.045
Dark brown
Wart
Barochory
—
Xerophyte
Ranunculaceae
Ceratocephalus testiculatus (Crantz) Bess.
AE
Achenecetum
106.46
±
0.99
4.614
±
0.229
4.548
±
0.276
3.600
±
0.180
0.018
Black
Beak/spine
Zoochory
—
Mesophyte
Clematis songarica Bge.
SS
Achene
234.84
±
11.31
4.038
±
0.106
1.800
±
0.044
0.654
±
0.023
0.126
Brown
Pappus
Anemochory
—
Mesophyte
Core eudicots
Caryophyllaceae
Gypsophila perfoliata L.
PH
Seed
31.06
±
0.45
0.944
±
0.010
0.784
±
0.023
0.460
±
0.009
0.048
Black
Wart
Barochory
—
Mesophyte
Amaranthaceae
Agriophyllum squarrosum (L.) Moq.
AH
Seed
115.82
±
2.70
2.208
±
0.093
1.712
±
0.074
0.524
±
0.040
0.108
White
None
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Anabasis aphylla L.
SS
Utricle
114.36
±
1.98
2.064
±
0.062
1.454
±
0.061
0.496
±
0.031
0.104
Dark reddish brown
Bract
Anemochory
—
Mesophyte
Atriplex aucheri Moq.
AH
Utricle
304.26
±
10.19
8.148
±
0.291
6.428
±
0.266
0.884
±
0.042
0.150
Light yellowish brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Atriplex tatarica L.
AH
Utricle
109.94
±
3.21
4.472
±
0.355
3.984
±
0.302
0.566
±
0.138
0.168
Yellowish brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Bassia dasyphylla (Fisch. et Mey.) O. Kuntze
AH
Utricle
66.32
±
0.78
3.018
±
0.145
2.692
±
0.115
0.444
±
0.021
0.150
Light yellowish brown
Spine
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Bassia Sedoides (Pall.) O. Kuntze
AH
Utricle
42.98
±
0.49
2.958
±
0.165
2.216
±
0.157
1.710
±
0.162
0.040
Yellowish brown
Hook/spine
Zoochory
—
Xerophyte
Camphorosma monspeliaca L.
SS
Utricle
53.58
±
1.45
2.238
±
0.066
1.350
±
0.039
0.708
±
0.034
0.083
Yellowish brown
Hair
Anemochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Ceratocarpus arenarius L.
AH
Utricle
151.14
±
2.49
7.624
±
0.556
10.484
±
1.246
0.534
±
0.028
0.364
Dark green/pale yellow
Spine
Zoochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Ceratoides ewersmanniana (Stschel. ex Losinsk.) Botsch. et Ikonn.
S
Utricle
330.64
±
4.65
7.272
±
0.566
8.794
±
0.790
3.680
±
0.344
0.179
Brown
Hair
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Ceratoides lateens (J. F. Gmel.) Reveal et Holmgren
S/SS
Utricle
434.80
±
14.25
7.066
±
0.371
8.018
±
0.399
4.398
±
0.206
0.076
Brown
Hair
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Chenopodium acuminatum Willd.
AH
Seed
35.22
±
0.16
0.964
±
0.025
0.868
±
0.024
0.416
±
0.021
0.065
Black
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Chenopodium aristatum Linn.
AH
Seed
10.66
±
0.22
0.594
±
0.023
0.548
±
0.024
0.340
±
0.018
0.037
Black
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Chenopodium glaucum Linn.
AH
Seed
21.58
±
0.21
0.864
±
0.049
0.798
±
0.051
0.342
±
0.013
0.074
Black
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Corispermum lehmannianum Bunge.
AH
Utricle
73.10
±
1.01
2.634
±
0.083
1.708
±
0.077
0.266
±
0.016
0.143
Yellowish green
Beak
Zoochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Halogeton arachnoideus Moq.
AH
Seed
43.88
±
0.92
1.346
±
0.061
1.102
±
0.045
0.390
±
0.017
0.095
Dark brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Halogeton glomeratus (Bieb.) C. A. Mey.
AH
Seed
105.98
±
1.12
2.092
±
0.047
1.388
±
0.034
0.604
±
0.015
0.088
Yellowish brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Halostachys caspica (Bieb.) C. A. Mey.
S
Utricle
24.24
±
0.74
1.798
±
0.077
1.366
±
0.060
0.920
±
0.057
0.046
Brown
None
Anemochory
—
Mesophyte
Haloxylon ammodendron (C. A. M.) Bge.
SA
Utricle
388.80
±
11.50
10.676
±
0.419
9.548
±
0.389
0.986
±
0.091
0.172
Yellowish brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Haloxylon persicum Bge. ex Boiss. et Buhse
SA
Utricle
797.18
±
8.45
9.528
±
0.149
8.820
±
0.122
1.608
±
0.119
0.147
Light yellowish brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Horaninowia ulicina Fisch. et Mey.
AH
Utricle
23.00
±
0.57
0.932
±
0.043
0.830
±
0.043
0.332
±
0.014
0.083
Pale yellow
Bract
Zoochory
—
Mesophyte
Kalidium capsicum (L.) Ung.-Sternb.
SS
Utricle
15.12
±
0.20
0.728
±
0.029
0.642
±
0.026
0.452
±
0.022
0.032
Light yellowish brown
None
Anemochory
—
Mesophyte
Kalidium cuspidatum (Ung.-Sternb.) Grub.
SS
Utricle
11.90
±
0.38
1.680
±
0.127
1.336
±
0.029
0.608
±
0.040
0.081
Light yellowish brown
None
Anemochory
—
Mesophyte
Kalidium foliatum (Pall.) G Moq.
SS
Utricle
16.06
±
0.65
1.270
±
0.121
0.938
±
0.141
0.770
±
0.081
0.047
Light yellowish brown
None
Anemochory
—
Mesophyte
Kochia iranica Litv. ex Bornm.
AH
Utricle
47.34
±
0.80
1.568
±
0.080
1.188
±
0.044
0.910
±
0.050
0.037
Dark brown
Hair
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Petrosmonia sibirica (Pall.) Bge.
AH
Utricle
174.96
±
1.51
3.712
±
0.213
1.988
±
0.030
0.874
±
0.039
0.104
Pale yellow
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Salicornia europaea Linn.
AH
Utricle
5.54
±
0.04
0.698
±
0.017
0.430
±
0.017
0.350
±
0.017
0.049
Dark brown
None
Anemochory
—
Xerophyte
Salsola affinis C. A. Mey.
AH
Utricle
626.96
±
15.51
8.032
±
0.408
7.106
±
0.347
3.174
±
0.140
0.072
Yellowish brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Salsola foliosa (L.) Schrad.
AH
Utricle
103.94
±
0.40
6.162
±
0.218
5.834
±
0.214
0.524
±
0.020
0.182
Reddish brown
Bract
Anemochory
—
Xerophyte
Salsola heptapotamica Iljin
AH
Utricle
518.34
±
6.87
10.176
±
0.596
9.210
±
0.525
1.874
±
0.183
0.139
Yellowish brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Salsola nitraria Pall.
AH
Utricle
180.20
±
3.96
6.690
±
0.269
5.958
±
0.290
1.668
±
0.126
0.115
Yellowish brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Salsola ruthenica Iljin
AH
Utricle
271.46
±
4.11
8.216
±
0.424
7.556
±
0.397
1.748
±
0.109
0.129
Brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Salsola subcrassa M. Pop.
AH
Utricle
1071.36
±
2.37
10.770
±
0.578
9.694
±
0.509
2.584
±
0.120
0.117
Yellowish brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Suaeda acuminata (C. A. Mey.) Moq.
AH
Utricle
56.88
±
1.67
1.456
±
0.088
1.264
±
0.071
1.020
±
0.056
0.020
Dark brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Suaeda altissima (L.) Pall.
AH
Utricle
34.74
±
0.57
1.244
±
0.033
1.076
±
0.046
0.768
±
0.033
0.029
Black
None
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Suaeda corniculata (C. A. Mey.) Bunge
AH
Utricle
33.79
±
0.58
1.102
±
0.026
0.924
±
0.026
0.580
±
0.021
0.047
Yellowish brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Suaeda microphylla (C. A. M.) Pall.
SS
Utricle
31.66
±
0.51
1.086
±
0.040
1.040
±
0.039
0.964
±
0.033
0.003
Black/yellowish brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Suaeda physophora Pall.
SS
Utricle
247.52
±
2.11
2.934
±
0.162
2.724
±
0.120
1.870
±
0.088
0.029
Reddish brown
Perianth
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Suaeda salsa (L.) Pall.
AH
Utricle
15.20
±
0.28
0.792
±
0.031
0.726
±
0.036
0.466
±
0.020
0.034
Black
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Polygonaceae
Atraphaxis frutescens (Rgl.) Krassn.
S
Achene
283.68
±
6.26
7.596
±
0.096
5.322
±
0.174
3.326
±
0.226
0.058
Brown
Perianth
Anemochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Calligonum ebinuricum Ivanova.
S
Achene
2672.20
±
121.39
10.138
±
0.369
6.614
±
0.521
5.738
±
0.437
0.045
Brown
Hook/spine
Zoochory
—
Mesophyte
Calligonum mongolicum Turcz.
SS
Achene
5934.84
±
57.75
14.056
±
0.538
12.604
±
0.390
12.454
±
0.398
0.005
Yellowish brown
Hook/spine
Zoochory
—
Xerophyte
Calligonum  leucocladum (Schrenk) Bunge
S
Achene
2829.50
±
124.68
10.614
±
0.423
10.250
±
1.378
8.240
±
1.235
0.087
Yellowish brown
Wing
Zoochory
—
Xerophyte
Rumex pseudonatronatus Borb.
PH
Achene
211.74
±
4.07
4.614
±
0.229
4.548
±
0.276
3.600
±
0.180
0.018
Yellowish brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Tamaricaceae
Reaumuria soongorica (Pall.) Maxim.
SS
Capsule
916.18
±
12.07
6.050
±
0.156
2.568
±
0.064
2.500
±
0.058
0.078
Dark brown
Hair
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Plumbaginaceae
Limonium coralloides (Tausch) Lincz.
PH
Utricle
26.40
±
0.63
2.622
±
0.048
1.424
±
0.049
1.390
±
0.050
0.051
Light brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Limonium gmelinii (Willd.) Kuntze.
PH
Utricle
45.50
±
1.22
3.532
±
0.090
1.324
±
0.062
1.288
±
0.063
0.093
Dark brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Limonium otolepis (Schrenk)
PH
Utricle
21.40
±
0.42
1.984
±
0.088
0.972
±
0.023
0.944
±
0.020
0.064
Light brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Limonium suffruticosum (L.) Kuntze.
SS
Utricle
30.26
±
0.52
2.784
±
0.157
0.896
±
0.066
0.868
±
0.067
0.109
Light brown
Bract
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Rosids
Geraniaceae
Erodium oxyrrhynchum M. B. Fl.
AE
Capsule
225.44
±
2.55
5.366
±
0.119
1.086
±
0.092
0.902
±
0.014
0.154
Brown
Pappus/beak
Anemochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Eurosids I
Fabaceae
Alhagi sparsifolia Shap.
SS
Pod
487.46
±
6.42
3.672
±
0.129
2.292
±
0.073
1.230
±
0.079
0.078
Brown
None
Autochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Amorpha fruticosa L.
S/SS
Pod
911.84
±
9.71
8.616
±
0.251
2.836
±
0.050
1.628
±
0.056
0.130
Nut-brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Eremosparton songoricum (Litv) Vass
SS
Pod
1547.34
±
26.08
4.402
±
0.129
3.358
±
0.067
1.266
±
0.044
0.091
Light yellowish brown
Awn, papery calyx
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Glycyrrhiza inflata Batal.
PH
Pod
3790.04
±
53.64
11.424
±
0.639
4.920
±
0.250
3.688
±
0.141
0.091
Brown
None
Autochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch
PH
Seed
903.80
±
5.98
2.796
±
0.151
2.301
±
0.061
1.534
±
0.038
0.038
Brown
None
Autochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Sophora alopecuroides L.
PH
Seed
1899.66
±
19.49
3.968
±
0.074
2.936
±
0.078
2.150
±
0.081
0.039
Light brown
None
Barochory
—
Xerophyte
Trigonella arcuata C. A. M.
AE
Seed
100.78
±
1.76
2.248
±
0.059
0.832
±
0.028
0.656
±
0.028
0.105
Yellowish green
None
Autochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Trigonella cancellata Desf.
AE
Seed
87.84
±
0.96
2.100
±
0.030
0.768
±
0.037
0.596
±
0.030
0.107
Yellowish green
None
Autochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Zygophyllaceae
Nitraria roborowskii Kom.
S
Berry
4599.56
±
91.07
7.916
±
0.174
4.598
±
0.281
3.616
±
0.137
0.059
Dark reddish brown
None
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Nitraria sibirica Pall.
S
Berry
3826.70
±
59.66
6.758
±
0.130
3.532
±
0.089
3.384
±
0.084
0.055
Dark reddish brown
None
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Peganum harmala Linn.
PH
Seed
289.36
±
2.84
3.360
±
0.046
1.832
±
0.079
0.908
±
0.041
0.096
Dark brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Zygophyllum fabago L.
PH
Seed
297.76
±
9.15
3.704
±
0.045
1.674
±
0.056
0.634
±
0.032
0.123
Brown
Balloon
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Zygophyllum pterocarpum Bge.
PH
Seed
170.24
±
4.38
3.476
±
0.089
1.884
±
0.056
0.360
±
0.016
0.140
Brown
Wart
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Zygophyllum xanthoxylon Maxim.
S
Capsule
10652.78
±
292.29
28.588
±
1.133
26.336
±
1.051
15.058
±
1.390
0.051
Pale yellow
Wing
Anemochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Rosaceae
Agrimonia asiatica Juz.
PH
Achenecetum
463.34
±
9.21
5.456
±
0.149
3.316
±
0.161
3.012
±
0.194
0.044
Green
Hook/spine
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Cannabaceae
Cannabis sativa L.
AH
Capsule
433.82
±
46.22
3.016
±
0.089
2.284
±
0.085
1.660
±
0.042
0.036
Grey
None
Barochory
—
Mesophyte
Eurosids II
Brassicaceae
Alyssum deserorum Stapf.
AE
Seed
37.32
±
0.50
1.474
±
0.043
1.044
±
0.044
0.334
±
0.013
0.107
Yellow
None
Ombro-hydrochory
—
Mesophyte
Alyssum linifolium Steph. ex Willd.
AE
Seed
18.00
±
0.29
1.330
±
0.030
0.902
±
0.033
0.274
±
0.018
0.111
Yellow
None
Ombro-hydrochory
—
Xerophyte
Camelina microcarpa Andrz.
AH
Seed
31.66
±
0.24
1.164
±
0.039
0.702
±
0.033
0.492
±
0.024
0.062
Yellowish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
—
Xerophyte
Camelina sativa (Linn.) Crantz
AH
Seed
31.90
±
0.83
1.114
±
0.028
0.614
±
0.019
0.502
±
0.024
0.061
Yellowish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
—
Mesophyte
Cardaria draba (L.) Desv.
PH
Seed
206.44
±
0.68
2.104
±
0.035
1.274
±
0.059
0.828
±
0.028
0.068
Reddish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Cardaria pubescens (C. A. Meyer) Jarmoenko
PH
Seed
94.80
±
1.30
1.670
±
0.046
1.050
±
0.027
0.620
±
0.021
0.070
Reddish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Descurainia Sophia (L.) Webb. ex Prantl
AH
Seed
10.60
±
0.07
0.916
±
0.025
0.422
±
0.011
0.336
±
0.013
0.081
Light reddish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Erysimum hieracifolium L.
BPH
Seed
29.22
±
0.34
1.324
±
0.063
0.620
±
0.025
0.430
±
0.020
0.091
Brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Euclidium syricum (L.) R. Br.
AE
Silicle
400.92
±
6.52
3.740
±
0.163
1.898
±
0.051
1.630
±
0.040
0.066
Brownish green/brown
Beak
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Isatis costata C. A. Mey.
BH
Silicle
394.58
±
24.67
8.708
±
0.430
3.904
±
0.299
1.332
±
0.079
0.129
Yellowish brown
Wing
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Isatis violascens Bge.
AE
Silicle
223.52
±
3.15
3.038
±
0.115
1.220
±
0.028
0.972
±
0.024
0.095
Yellowish brown
Wing
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Lepidium apetalum Willd.
ABH
Seed
18.00
±
0.13
1.016
±
0.023
0.620
±
0.022
0.362
±
0.020
0.074
Reddish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Lepidium ferganense Korsh.
PH
Seed
21.34
±
0.52
1.360
±
0.022
0.684
±
0.022
0.312
±
0.015
0.106
Reddish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
—
Mesophyte
Lepidium latifolium var. affine C. A. Mey
PH
Seed
15.22
±
0.36
0.930
±
0.026
0.544
±
0.023
0.336
±
0.015
0.074
Reddish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
—
Mesophyte
Lepidium perfoliatum L.
ABE
Seed
78.32
±
0.26
1.878
±
0.042
1.188
±
0.041
0.446
±
0.015
0.102
Yellowish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Malcolmia africana (L.) R. Br.
BE
Seed
13.64
±
0.00
1.024
±
0.040
0.567
±
0.038
0.360
±
0.017
0.080
Light yellowish brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Neotorularia korolkovii (Rgl. et Schmlh.) Hedge et J. Leonard.
ABE
Seed
9.46
±
0.11
0.966
±
0.037
0.448
±
0.026
0.200
±
0.026
0.117
Yellowish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
—
Mesophyte
Syrenia siliculosa (M. Bieb.) Andrz.
BH
Seed
20.94
±
0.39
1.588
±
0.090
0.678
±
0.026
0.420
±
0.015
0.103
Orange
None
Ombro-hydrochory
—
Xerophyte
Tetracme quadricornis (Steph.) Bge.
AE
Seed
8.00
±
0.11
0.880
±
0.024
0.458
±
0.011
0.284
±
0.016
0.086
Light yellowish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
—
Mesophyte
Thlaspi arvense L.
AE
Seed
74.26
±
0.46
1.598
±
0.034
1.102
±
0.016
0.592
±
0.022
0.070
Dark brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Malvaceae
Abutilon theophrasti Medicus
AH
Seed
858.18
±
6.37
3.396
±
0.063
2.756
±
0.035
1.544
±
0.029
0.054
Dark brown
Hair
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Althaea officinalis L.
PH
Schizocarp
153.88
±
2.99
2.756
±
0.053
2.352
±
0.042
1.292
±
0.154
0.062
Light brown
Hair
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Althaea nudiflora Lindl.
BH
Schizocarp
593.78
±
8.71
4.732
±
0.120
4.004
±
0.046
1.168
±
0.069
0.111
Light brown
Hair
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Hibiscus trionum L.
AH
Seed
454.08
±
5.71
2.276
±
0.039
2.032
±
0.036
1.392
±
0.027
0.028
Black
Wart
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Euasterids I
Scrophulariaceae
Dodartia orientalis L.
PH
Seed
8.72
±
0.15
0.516
±
0.009
0.356
±
0.008
0.324
±
0.009
0.028
Black
None
Barochory
—
Mesophyte
Leptorhabdos parviflora Benth.
AH
Seed
111.26
±
1.11
2.540
±
0.103
1.096
±
0.064
0.588
±
0.024
0.111
Dark brown
None
Barochory
—
Mesophyte
Veronica ferganiea M Pop.
AE
Seed
40.60
±
0.65
1.458
±
0.042
0.722
±
0.029
0.522
±
0.029
0.081
Brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Solanaceae
Datura stramonium L.
SS
Seed
691.98
±
5.76
3.304
±
0.046
2.608
±
0.051
1.316
±
0.040
0.065
Black
None
Barochory
—
Xerophyte
Hyoscyamus niger L.
BH
Seed
62.94
±
0.97
1.294
±
0.027
1.086
±
0.035
0.594
±
0.025
0.057
Yellowish brown
None
Barochory
—
Xerophyte
Boraginaceae
Arnebia decumbens (Vent.) Coss. et Kral.
AE
Nutlet
1335.44
±
11.70
10.690
±
0.345
6.384
±
0.332
5.360
±
0.164
0.052
Brown
Hook/spine
Zoochory
—
Xerophyte
Heliotropium ellipticum Ldb.
PH
Schizocarp
95.82
±
1.27
2.022
±
0.145
1.260
±
0.077
0.998
±
0.055
0.049
Brownish green
Wart
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Lappula myosotis Moench
ABE
Nutlet
435.18
±
2.71
4.354
±
0.144
3.432
±
0.150
3.154
±
0.146
0.021
Dark brown
Spine
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Lappula spinocarpa (Forssk.) Aschers. ex Kuntze
AE
Nutlet
1491.06
±
57.20
3.924
±
0.065
3.118
±
0.037
4.112
±
0.139
0.016
Light yellowish brown
Spine
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Lepechiniella lasiocarpa W. T. Wang
AH
Nutlet
451.48
±
4.14
2.860
±
0.107
2.778
±
0.101
2.606
±
0.126
0.015
Brown
Spine
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Lindelofia stylosa (Kar. et Kir.) Brand.
PH
Nutlet
1397.80
±
28.88
6.768
±
0.069
4.648
±
0.083
2.248
±
0.044
0.078
Yellowish brown
Spine
Zoochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Lamiaceae
Elsholtzia densa Benth.
PH
Nutlet
10.02
±
0.09
0.688
±
0.010
0.508
±
0.020
0.468
±
0.018
0.023
Dark brown
Wart
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Leonurus turkestanicus V. Krecz. et Rupr.
PH
Nutlet
111.60
±
0.56
2.364
±
0.038
1.396
±
0.060
0.720
±
0.046
0.086
Light brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Marrubium vulgare L.
PH
Nutlet
99.34
±
0.55
1.784
±
0.055
1.060
±
0.038
0.724
±
0.015
0.066
Dark brown
Wart
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Phlomis chinghoensis C. Y. Wu
PH
Nutlet
556.84
±
8.71
4.268
±
0.083
2.380
±
0.074
1.280
±
0.340
0.087
Dark brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Salvia deserta Schang.
PH
Nutlet
51.58
±
1.24
1.576
±
0.030
1.164
±
0.033
0.700
±
0.025
0.055
Black
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Plantaginaceae
Plantago lessingii Fisch. et Mey.
AE
Seed
193.74
±
2.13
3.514
±
0.064
1.328
±
0.059
0.610
±
0.041
0.129
Yellowish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Plantago major L.
PH
Seed
17.66
±
0.38
1.132
±
0.049
0.656
±
0.015
0.372
±
0.016
0.080
Yellowish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Plantago maritima Linn. subsp. ciliata Printz.
PH
Seed
44.06
±
0.57
1.756
±
0.054
0.824
±
0.044
0.426
±
0.023
0.105
Yellowish brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Plantago minuta Pall.
AE
Seed
203.80
±
5.43
3.534
±
0.090
1.366
±
0.033
0.586
±
0.017
0.129
Dark brown
None
Ombro-hydrochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Convolvulaceae
Cuscuta australis R. Br.
AH
Seed
77.36
±
3.33
1.260
±
0.048
1.028
±
0.038
0.732
±
0.026
0.031
Light brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Rubiaceae
Galium rivale (Sibth. et Smith) Griseb.
PH
Seed
35.44
±
0.13
1.056
±
0.031
0.728
±
0.022
0.592
±
0.037
0.041
Dark brown
Wart
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Euasterids II
Campanulaceae
Codonopsis clematidea (Schrenk) C. B. Clarke
PH
Seed
50.18
±
0.41
1.384
±
0.036
0.636
±
0.027
0.584
±
0.027
0.074
Light brown
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Asteraceae
Arctium lappa L.
BH
Achene
1153.06
±
9.95
6.272
±
0.063
2.556
±
0.089
1.320
±
0.022
0.117
Brown
Pappus
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Arctium tomentosum Mill.
BH
Achene
931.96
±
13.94
5.412
±
0.028
2.376
±
0.076
1.324
±
0.030
0.107
Brown
Pappus
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Artemisia annua L.
AH
Achene
5.00
±
0.14
1.208
±
0.016
0.384
±
0.017
0.308
±
0.021
0.119
Light brown
None
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Artemisia ordosica Krasch
SS
Achenecetum
245.66
±
4.02
1.546
±
0.033
0.572
±
0.022
0.370
±
0.014
0.115
Brown
None
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Cancrinia discoidea (Ledeb.) Poljak.
BH
Achene
21.74
±
0.29
2.932
±
0.175
0.908
±
0.027
0.878
±
0.022
0.111
Pale yellow
Pappus
Anemochory
—
Xerophyte
Centaurea squarosa Willd.
BPH
Achenecetum
1860.14
±
30.25
9.638
±
0.294
5.160
±
0.087
5.016
±
0.137
0.053
Pale yellow
Hook/spine
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Cichorium intybus L.
PH
Achene
93.22
±
2.10
2.988
±
0.044
1.140
±
0.065
0.552
±
0.044
0.127
Yellowish brown
Pappus
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Cousinia affinis Schrenk
PH
Achene
424.78
±
4.07
4.876
±
0.196
2.560
±
0.077
1.384
±
0.052
0.093
Greyish black
Hook/spine
Zoochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Garhadiolus papposus Boiss. et Buhse
AE
Achene
230.00
±
2.94
5.904
±
0.205
3.158
±
0.113
1.114
±
0.076
0.116
Light yellowish brown
Pappus/beak
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Koelpinia linearis Pall.
AE
Achene
552.36
±
3.95
10.262
±
0.329
6.682
±
0.293
2.244
±
0.217
0.111
Brown
Hook/spine
Zoochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Neopallasia pectinata (Pall.) Poljak.
AH
Achene
33.70
±
1.83
1.628
±
0.047
0.758
±
0.021
0.320
±
0.012
0.116
Dark brown
None
Anemochory
—
Mesophyte
Onopordum acanthium L.
BH
Achene
982.10
±
7.56
4.852
±
0.053
2.556
±
0.039
1.410
±
0.034
0.090
Grey/greyish black
None
Barochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Saussurea salsa (Pall.) Spreng.
PH
Achene
129.22
±
4.70
3.522
±
0.134
1.302
±
0.053
0.712
±
0.047
0.123
Greyish white
Pappus
Anemochory
Ant
Mesophyte
Xanthium mongolicum Kitag.
AH
Achene
19317.88
±
131.28
22.088
±
0.579
13.344
±
0.219
12.596
±
0.332
0.040
Yellowish green/green
Beak/hook/spine
Zoochory
—
Mesophyte
Apiaceae
Conium maculatum L.
BH
Schizocarp
278.92
±
8.04
2.852
±
0.069
1.540
±
0.013
1.104
±
0.044
0.071
Light yellowish brown
None
Barochory
—
Mesophyte
Soranthus meyeri Ledeb.
PH
Schizocarp
189.68
±
1.07
4.492
±
0.156
3.366
±
0.158
0.806
±
0.070
0.130
Pale yellow
None
Barochory
Ant
Xerophyte
Notes: AH: annuals; ABH: annuals/biennials; BH: biennials; BPH: biennials/perennials; PH: perennials; S: shrubs; SS: semishrubs; SA: small arbor; AE: annuals ephemerals; ABE: annuals/biennials ephemerals; BE: biennial ephemerals.Plant types with both short and long vegetative periods were evolved in this area [24] and short (ephemeral) plants included annuals, ainnuals/biennials, and biennials herb, so vegetative periods were divided into annuals (AH), annuals/biennials (ABH), biennials (BH), biennials/perennials (BPH), perennials (PH), shrubs (S), semishrubs (SS), small arbor (SA), annuals ephemerals (AE), annuals/biennials ephemerals (ABE), and biennial ephemerals (BE) (Table 1).Ecotypes were divided into 2 categories: xerophyte (67 species, 44.67%) and mesophyte (83 species, 55.33%) (Table1).


## 2.3. Study Methods on Morphology Characteristics and Dispersal Syndromes

### 2.3.1. Morphology Characteristics

Metrical objects of 150 species could be divided into seeds (55 species) and fruits (95 species), which could be further divided into various types.(1)
Mass: With reference to Thompson’s method [26], we randomly selected 100 seeds or fruits in each species, measuring the weight (g) with fine balance (Sartorius BS110S, accuracy to 0.0001 g). Each species had five repeats, and then we took the average value and calculated the standard error. If the appendages were valuable for dispersal, we measured including them.
(2)
Shape: according to Thompson et al.’s methods [26], the seed shape was calculated as the variance of the three main perpendicular dimensions after dividing all values by length. Totally spherical seeds would have shape = 0, with this value increasing as they became flatter or elongated. In other words, larger values of variance were associated with flatter seeds; smaller variance indicated more round seeds. According to the three-dimensional mean variance, we classified them into seven grades and calculated the frequency of occurrence (percentage) at each grade. Finally, combining observation and [6, 23], we determined the shape of each species and calculated the frequency (percentage) of each shape group.
(3)
Color: combining observation and [6, 23], we can determine the diaspore color of each species and calculate the frequency (percentage) of each color group.
(4)
Appendage: We observed and recorded the appendage features, such as wing/bract, pappus/hair, hook/spine, awn, or other kinds of appendages (such as style/perianth/beak/warts/placenta, etc.).


### 2.3.2. Dispersal Syndromes

Because seed dispersal was divided into two phases. (1) Phase I dispersal represents the movement of the seeds from the parent plant to a surface, each of 150 study species were assigned to one of five dispersal syndromes in their primal dispersal phase, on the basis of data from field collections, observing seed ornamentation and appendages and descriptions from published flora [27–29]. ① Zoochorous species are defined as having awns, spines, or hooks to adhere to animals (epizoochory) or seed with fleshly or arillate fruits for animals to eat (endochory); ② anemochorous species are defined as having membranous wings, bracts, perianth, balloon, hair, or dust seed (<0.01 mg); ③ autochorous species are divided into ballistically dispersed species possessing explosively dehiscing capsules by wind and by wetting that throw the seeds some distance from the parent plant; ④ barochorous species are defined as those lacking any obvious dispersal mechanism or disperser reward; and ⑤ ombrohydrochory dispersed species are defined as the seeds producing a mucilage upon being wetted (Table 1). (2) Phase II dispersal includes both horizontal and vertical movement of the seeds after arrival on the surface until it is lodged or germinated. Though many species are subject to secondary dispersal by animals (major ants (myrmecochory), indicated by the presence of an elaiosome or an appendage on seeds that is attractive to ants) or water, for the purpose of this analysis it was examined only the primary phase of dispersal. Meanwhile, ants as a mass of predators, the seeds were divided to secondary dispersal type.


## 2.3.1. Morphology Characteristics

Metrical objects of 150 species could be divided into seeds (55 species) and fruits (95 species), which could be further divided into various types.(1)
Mass: With reference to Thompson’s method [26], we randomly selected 100 seeds or fruits in each species, measuring the weight (g) with fine balance (Sartorius BS110S, accuracy to 0.0001 g). Each species had five repeats, and then we took the average value and calculated the standard error. If the appendages were valuable for dispersal, we measured including them.
(2)
Shape: according to Thompson et al.’s methods [26], the seed shape was calculated as the variance of the three main perpendicular dimensions after dividing all values by length. Totally spherical seeds would have shape = 0, with this value increasing as they became flatter or elongated. In other words, larger values of variance were associated with flatter seeds; smaller variance indicated more round seeds. According to the three-dimensional mean variance, we classified them into seven grades and calculated the frequency of occurrence (percentage) at each grade. Finally, combining observation and [6, 23], we determined the shape of each species and calculated the frequency (percentage) of each shape group.
(3)
Color: combining observation and [6, 23], we can determine the diaspore color of each species and calculate the frequency (percentage) of each color group.
(4)
Appendage: We observed and recorded the appendage features, such as wing/bract, pappus/hair, hook/spine, awn, or other kinds of appendages (such as style/perianth/beak/warts/placenta, etc.).


## 2.3.2. Dispersal Syndromes

Because seed dispersal was divided into two phases. (1) Phase I dispersal represents the movement of the seeds from the parent plant to a surface, each of 150 study species were assigned to one of five dispersal syndromes in their primal dispersal phase, on the basis of data from field collections, observing seed ornamentation and appendages and descriptions from published flora [27–29]. ① Zoochorous species are defined as having awns, spines, or hooks to adhere to animals (epizoochory) or seed with fleshly or arillate fruits for animals to eat (endochory); ② anemochorous species are defined as having membranous wings, bracts, perianth, balloon, hair, or dust seed (<0.01 mg); ③ autochorous species are divided into ballistically dispersed species possessing explosively dehiscing capsules by wind and by wetting that throw the seeds some distance from the parent plant; ④ barochorous species are defined as those lacking any obvious dispersal mechanism or disperser reward; and ⑤ ombrohydrochory dispersed species are defined as the seeds producing a mucilage upon being wetted (Table 1). (2) Phase II dispersal includes both horizontal and vertical movement of the seeds after arrival on the surface until it is lodged or germinated. Though many species are subject to secondary dispersal by animals (major ants (myrmecochory), indicated by the presence of an elaiosome or an appendage on seeds that is attractive to ants) or water, for the purpose of this analysis it was examined only the primary phase of dispersal. Meanwhile, ants as a mass of predators, the seeds were divided to secondary dispersal type.


## 2.4. Data Analysis

SPSS 15.0 was used for calculating the mean and the standard error of data. The ANOVA method (SPSS 15.0) was applied to analyze the significant difference between the diaspore mass (weight)/shape in different APG, vegetative periods, ecotypes, and dispersal syndromes. To examine differences in diaspore mass and shape among vegetative periods and taxonomic class rank, we used the Kruskal-Wallis test (K-W) after categorization of the variables. The association between nominal traits was determined with the Pearson x
2 test-statistic. Correlations between quantitative traits were examined using Pearson correlation coefficient. Diaspore mass was log-transformed prior to statistical analysis. One-way analysis of variance ANOVA was applied after verifying the homogeneity of variance by Levene’s test.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. The Relationship between Diaspore Mass with Phylogeny, Life History Traits, and Ecotype

The species of Core eudiocot were the most abundant in all groups of APG II (Figure1). Except for Coniferopsida and Rosids, which are only one species in their APG II taxonomic group, diaspore mass differed significantly among the phylogenic group (K-W: H
=
29.938, df = 7, P
<
0.001); group of Monocots had the highest diaspore mass; and Eudicots had the smallest diaspore mass (Figure 1). Except for ABH, the diaspore mass differed significantly among the vegetative period (K-W: H
=
17.677, df = 8, P
=
0.024); the species of shrub had the highest diaspore mass and ephemerals had the smallest diaspore mass (Figure 2). The diaspore mass differed significantly among dispersal syndromes (F
=
8.383, df = 4, P
<
0.001); the zoochorous species had the highest diaspore mass and the ombro-hydrychorous species had the smallest diaspore mass (Figure 3). The dispersal syndromes had a significant relationship with APG (K-W: H
=
75.921, df = 7, P
<
0.001) and vegetative period (K-W: H
=
28.108, df = 8, P
<
0.001). The second dispersal seeds by ants were about 72.7% (Table 1). There were significant differences between diaspores mass and ant dispersal (Z
=
-
3.343, P
=
0.001). The diaspore mass did not differ significantly among ecotypes (Z
=
-
1.701, P
=
0.089), but the species of xerophytes had a higher diaspore mass than the species of mesophyte (Figure 4).Figure 1
Box plots showing mean (+), median (—), quartiles, and outliers (-) of diaspore mass of 150 species grouped by different APG II taxonomic phylogeny group. Because Coniferopsida and Rosids are only one species, they do not compare with others.Figure 2
Box plots showing mean (+), median (—), quartiles, and outliers (-) of diaspore mass of 150 species grouped by different vegetative periods. Because annual-biennial (ABH) species is only one species, it does not compare with others. AH = annuals; ABH = annuals/biennials;  BH = biennials; BPH = biennials/perennials; PH = perennials; S = shrubs; SS = semishrubs; SA = small arbor; AE = annuals ephemerals; ABE = annuals/biennials ephemerals; BE = biennial ephemerals.Figure 3
Box plots showing mean (+), median (—), quartiles, and outliers (-) of diaspore mass of 150 species grouped by different dispersal syndromes.Figure 4
Box plots showing mean (+), median (—), quartiles, and outliers (-) of diaspore mass of 150 species grouped by different ecotypes


### 3.2. The Relationship between Diaspore Shape with Phylogeny, Life History Traits, and Ecotype

The diaspore mean shape variance showed differences in APG II group (K-W: H
=
29.120, df = 7, P
<
0.001) and dispersal syndromes (F
=
3.596, df = 4, P
=
0.008); the species of Commelinids of zoochorous had the largest shape mean variance and the species of Monocots and ombro-hydrychory had smallest shape mean variance (Figures 5 and 7), but not in different vegetative period (K-W: H
=
9.101, df = 8, P
=
0.334) (Figure 6) or ecotype (Z
=
-
0.830, P
=
0.407) (Figure 8). According to shape mean variance and observation, the diaspore shape of 150 species could be divided into the following nine groups (Figure 9), of which 63.33% (95 species) are close to spherical or oval. There were significant differences between diaspore shape and ant dispersal (Z
=
-
2.218, P
=
0.027). Two ANOVAs showed only significant interaction between APG and dispersal syndromes in shape variance (F
=
2.707, P
=
0.003).Figure 5
Box plots showing mean (+), median (—), quartiles, and outliers (-) of diaspore shape (variance) of 150 species grouped by different APG II taxonomic phylogeny group. Because Coniferopsida and Rosids are only one species, they do not compare with others.Figure 6
Box plots showing mean (+), median (—), quartiles, and outliers (-) of diaspore shape (variance) of 150 species grouped by different vegetative periods. Because annual-biennial (ABH) species is only one species, it does not compare with others. AH = annuals; ABH = annuals/biennials; BH = biennials; BPH = biennials/perennials; PH = perennials; S = shrubs; SS = semishrubs; SA = small arbor; AE = annuals ephemerals; ABE = annuals/biennials ephemerals; BE = biennial ephemerals.Figure 7
Box plots showing mean (+), median (—), quartiles, and outliers (-) of diaspore shape (variance) of 150 species grouped by different dispersal syndromes.Figure 8
Box plots showing mean (+), median (—), quartiles, and outliers (-) of diaspore shape (variance) of 150 species grouped by different ecotypes.Figure 9
Frequency distribution of diaspore geometric shape. (1) Spheroideus, nearly-spheroideus; (2) elipsoid, broad-elipsoid, narrow-ellipsoid, ovoid, elongated-ovoid, obovoid, elongated-obovoid, subulate-ovoid, cylindrical-obovoid, spherical, spherical-ovoid; (3) lenticular, planular-ovoid, oblate-disc; (4) cylindrical, conical; (5) spindly, lanceolate, needle, Linearis; (6) reni; (7) arcuatus, curved; (8) trigonous, triqueter; (9) fan, rhombus.The the source of variance is following by Mazer’s method [3], multi-ANOVAs detected that variance in the diaspore mass accounted for 17.2% by APG, 6.6% by vegetative period, 16.1% by dispersal syndromes, and 0.1% by ecotype, while in the diaspore shape it was accounted 12.9% by APG, 5.5% by vegetative period, 3.9% by dispersal syndromes, and 0.2% by ecotype (Table 2).Table 2
Multiway tests of between-subjects effects.
Source
Seed mass
Seed shape
df
F
Sig.
R
2
F
Sig.
R
2
Model
20
5.833
0.000
0.481
2.725
0.000
0.302
APG
7
5.856
0.000
0.169
3.185
0.004
0.125
Vegetative period
8
2.152
0.036
0.071
1.223
0.291
0.053
Dispersal syndromes
4
9.733
0.000
0.160
1.748
0.143
0.040
Ecotype
1
0.248
0.619
0.001
0.313
0.577
0.003
Remove APG
Model
13
4.654
0.000
0.309
2.168
0.014
0.173
Vegetative period
8
2.853
0.006
0.117
1.509
0.160
0.073
Dispersal syndromes
4
7.650
0.000
0.157
4.706
0.001
0.115
Ecotype
1
1.490
0.224
0.008
0.584
0.446
0.003
Remove vegetative period
Model
12
7.974
0.000
0.415
3.686
0.000
0.247
APG
7
7.094
0.000
0.215
3.782
0.001
0.149
Dispersal syndromes
4
11.135
0.000
0.193
1.296
0.275
0.029
Ecotype
1
0.432
0.512
0.002
0.390
0.533
0.003
Remove dispersal syndromes
Model
16
3.829
0.000
0.320
2.902
0.000
0.263
APG
7
4.444
0.000
0.163
5.068
0.000
0.202
Vegetative period
8
2.474
0.016
0.103
1.002
0.438
0.045
Ecotype
1
0.944
0.333
0.005
0.255
0.614
0.003
Remove ecotype
Model
19
6.164
0.000
0.480
2.867
0.000
0.300
APG
7
6.103
0.000
0.175
3.322
0.003
0.127
Vegetative period
8
2.184
0.033
0.072
1.246
0.278
0.056
Dispersal syndromes
4
10.030
0.000
0.164
1.745
0.144
0.037


### 3.3. Diaspore Color

According to comparison and observation, the diaspore color of 150 species could be divided into the following eight groups (Figure10), of which 68.67% (103 species) are close to brown. Diaspore color and ant dispersal had no significant relationship (Z
=
-
1.109, P
=
0.267).Figure 10
Frequency distribution of diaspore color. (1) Light brown, brown, dark brown, nut-brown; (2) light reddish brown, reddish brown, dark reddish brown; (3) light yellowish brown, yellowish brown, dark yellowish brown; (4) pale yellow, yellow, orange, reddish yellow; (5) light green, green, dark green, brownish green, yellowish green; (6) white; (7) grey, greyish white, greyish black; (8) black.


### 3.4. Diaspore Appendages

Of the 150 species examined, 85 species (56.67%) had typical appendages, in which (1) 26 species (17.33%) had wings or bracts, which effectively spread with the wind; (2) 18 species (12.00%) had pappus or hairs, which effectively spread with the wind or stuck on animals; (3) 14 species (9.33%) had hooks or spines, which effectively hook on animals; (4) 10 species (6.67%) had awns, which effectively hang on animals or insert into the soil cracks for colonization; and (5) 17 species (11.33%) had other appendages, including style, perianth, beak, warts, placenta, and so forth, separately helping in different ways of dispersal (Table1). The diaspores with appendage have a significant relationship with diaspore mass (Z
=
-
4.508, P
<
0.001) and diaspore shape (Z
=
-
2.682, P
=
0.007). This indicated that diaspores with appendage trended to large diaspore mass and irregular shape.


## 3.1. The Relationship between Diaspore Mass with Phylogeny, Life History Traits, and Ecotype

The species of Core eudiocot were the most abundant in all groups of APG II (Figure1). Except for Coniferopsida and Rosids, which are only one species in their APG II taxonomic group, diaspore mass differed significantly among the phylogenic group (K-W: H
=
29.938, df = 7, P
<
0.001); group of Monocots had the highest diaspore mass; and Eudicots had the smallest diaspore mass (Figure 1). Except for ABH, the diaspore mass differed significantly among the vegetative period (K-W: H
=
17.677, df = 8, P
=
0.024); the species of shrub had the highest diaspore mass and ephemerals had the smallest diaspore mass (Figure 2). The diaspore mass differed significantly among dispersal syndromes (F
=
8.383, df = 4, P
<
0.001); the zoochorous species had the highest diaspore mass and the ombro-hydrychorous species had the smallest diaspore mass (Figure 3). The dispersal syndromes had a significant relationship with APG (K-W: H
=
75.921, df = 7, P
<
0.001) and vegetative period (K-W: H
=
28.108, df = 8, P
<
0.001). The second dispersal seeds by ants were about 72.7% (Table 1). There were significant differences between diaspores mass and ant dispersal (Z
=
-
3.343, P
=
0.001). The diaspore mass did not differ significantly among ecotypes (Z
=
-
1.701, P
=
0.089), but the species of xerophytes had a higher diaspore mass than the species of mesophyte (Figure 4).Figure 1
Box plots showing mean (+), median (—), quartiles, and outliers (-) of diaspore mass of 150 species grouped by different APG II taxonomic phylogeny group. Because Coniferopsida and Rosids are only one species, they do not compare with others.Figure 2
Box plots showing mean (+), median (—), quartiles, and outliers (-) of diaspore mass of 150 species grouped by different vegetative periods. Because annual-biennial (ABH) species is only one species, it does not compare with others. AH = annuals; ABH = annuals/biennials;  BH = biennials; BPH = biennials/perennials; PH = perennials; S = shrubs; SS = semishrubs; SA = small arbor; AE = annuals ephemerals; ABE = annuals/biennials ephemerals; BE = biennial ephemerals.Figure 3
Box plots showing mean (+), median (—), quartiles, and outliers (-) of diaspore mass of 150 species grouped by different dispersal syndromes.Figure 4
Box plots showing mean (+), median (—), quartiles, and outliers (-) of diaspore mass of 150 species grouped by different ecotypes


## 3.2. The Relationship between Diaspore Shape with Phylogeny, Life History Traits, and Ecotype

The diaspore mean shape variance showed differences in APG II group (K-W: H
=
29.120, df = 7, P
<
0.001) and dispersal syndromes (F
=
3.596, df = 4, P
=
0.008); the species of Commelinids of zoochorous had the largest shape mean variance and the species of Monocots and ombro-hydrychory had smallest shape mean variance (Figures 5 and 7), but not in different vegetative period (K-W: H
=
9.101, df = 8, P
=
0.334) (Figure 6) or ecotype (Z
=
-
0.830, P
=
0.407) (Figure 8). According to shape mean variance and observation, the diaspore shape of 150 species could be divided into the following nine groups (Figure 9), of which 63.33% (95 species) are close to spherical or oval. There were significant differences between diaspore shape and ant dispersal (Z
=
-
2.218, P
=
0.027). Two ANOVAs showed only significant interaction between APG and dispersal syndromes in shape variance (F
=
2.707, P
=
0.003).Figure 5
Box plots showing mean (+), median (—), quartiles, and outliers (-) of diaspore shape (variance) of 150 species grouped by different APG II taxonomic phylogeny group. Because Coniferopsida and Rosids are only one species, they do not compare with others.Figure 6
Box plots showing mean (+), median (—), quartiles, and outliers (-) of diaspore shape (variance) of 150 species grouped by different vegetative periods. Because annual-biennial (ABH) species is only one species, it does not compare with others. AH = annuals; ABH = annuals/biennials; BH = biennials; BPH = biennials/perennials; PH = perennials; S = shrubs; SS = semishrubs; SA = small arbor; AE = annuals ephemerals; ABE = annuals/biennials ephemerals; BE = biennial ephemerals.Figure 7
Box plots showing mean (+), median (—), quartiles, and outliers (-) of diaspore shape (variance) of 150 species grouped by different dispersal syndromes.Figure 8
Box plots showing mean (+), median (—), quartiles, and outliers (-) of diaspore shape (variance) of 150 species grouped by different ecotypes.Figure 9
Frequency distribution of diaspore geometric shape. (1) Spheroideus, nearly-spheroideus; (2) elipsoid, broad-elipsoid, narrow-ellipsoid, ovoid, elongated-ovoid, obovoid, elongated-obovoid, subulate-ovoid, cylindrical-obovoid, spherical, spherical-ovoid; (3) lenticular, planular-ovoid, oblate-disc; (4) cylindrical, conical; (5) spindly, lanceolate, needle, Linearis; (6) reni; (7) arcuatus, curved; (8) trigonous, triqueter; (9) fan, rhombus.The the source of variance is following by Mazer’s method [3], multi-ANOVAs detected that variance in the diaspore mass accounted for 17.2% by APG, 6.6% by vegetative period, 16.1% by dispersal syndromes, and 0.1% by ecotype, while in the diaspore shape it was accounted 12.9% by APG, 5.5% by vegetative period, 3.9% by dispersal syndromes, and 0.2% by ecotype (Table 2).Table 2
Multiway tests of between-subjects effects.
Source
Seed mass
Seed shape
df
F
Sig.
R
2
F
Sig.
R
2
Model
20
5.833
0.000
0.481
2.725
0.000
0.302
APG
7
5.856
0.000
0.169
3.185
0.004
0.125
Vegetative period
8
2.152
0.036
0.071
1.223
0.291
0.053
Dispersal syndromes
4
9.733
0.000
0.160
1.748
0.143
0.040
Ecotype
1
0.248
0.619
0.001
0.313
0.577
0.003
Remove APG
Model
13
4.654
0.000
0.309
2.168
0.014
0.173
Vegetative period
8
2.853
0.006
0.117
1.509
0.160
0.073
Dispersal syndromes
4
7.650
0.000
0.157
4.706
0.001
0.115
Ecotype
1
1.490
0.224
0.008
0.584
0.446
0.003
Remove vegetative period
Model
12
7.974
0.000
0.415
3.686
0.000
0.247
APG
7
7.094
0.000
0.215
3.782
0.001
0.149
Dispersal syndromes
4
11.135
0.000
0.193
1.296
0.275
0.029
Ecotype
1
0.432
0.512
0.002
0.390
0.533
0.003
Remove dispersal syndromes
Model
16
3.829
0.000
0.320
2.902
0.000
0.263
APG
7
4.444
0.000
0.163
5.068
0.000
0.202
Vegetative period
8
2.474
0.016
0.103
1.002
0.438
0.045
Ecotype
1
0.944
0.333
0.005
0.255
0.614
0.003
Remove ecotype
Model
19
6.164
0.000
0.480
2.867
0.000
0.300
APG
7
6.103
0.000
0.175
3.322
0.003
0.127
Vegetative period
8
2.184
0.033
0.072
1.246
0.278
0.056
Dispersal syndromes
4
10.030
0.000
0.164
1.745
0.144
0.037


## 3.3. Diaspore Color

According to comparison and observation, the diaspore color of 150 species could be divided into the following eight groups (Figure10), of which 68.67% (103 species) are close to brown. Diaspore color and ant dispersal had no significant relationship (Z
=
-
1.109, P
=
0.267).Figure 10
Frequency distribution of diaspore color. (1) Light brown, brown, dark brown, nut-brown; (2) light reddish brown, reddish brown, dark reddish brown; (3) light yellowish brown, yellowish brown, dark yellowish brown; (4) pale yellow, yellow, orange, reddish yellow; (5) light green, green, dark green, brownish green, yellowish green; (6) white; (7) grey, greyish white, greyish black; (8) black.


## 3.4. Diaspore Appendages

Of the 150 species examined, 85 species (56.67%) had typical appendages, in which (1) 26 species (17.33%) had wings or bracts, which effectively spread with the wind; (2) 18 species (12.00%) had pappus or hairs, which effectively spread with the wind or stuck on animals; (3) 14 species (9.33%) had hooks or spines, which effectively hook on animals; (4) 10 species (6.67%) had awns, which effectively hang on animals or insert into the soil cracks for colonization; and (5) 17 species (11.33%) had other appendages, including style, perianth, beak, warts, placenta, and so forth, separately helping in different ways of dispersal (Table1). The diaspores with appendage have a significant relationship with diaspore mass (Z
=
-
4.508, P
<
0.001) and diaspore shape (Z
=
-
2.682, P
=
0.007). This indicated that diaspores with appendage trended to large diaspore mass and irregular shape.


## 4. Discussion

### 4.1. Comparison of Diaspore Mass and Shape among APG, Vegetative Periods, Ecotypes, and Dispersal Syndromes

Diaspore mass might be the result of both selective pressures over a long-term ecological process and the constraints over the long-standing evolutionary history of the taxonomic group. Phylogenetic effects on life history traits have been interpreted as “phylogenetic constraints,” defined as “properties shared by the members of a monophyletic group by virtue of their common ancestry, which limits the response of these taxon to directional selection” [1]. Similarly, Moles et al. [30, 31] used phylogenetic analyses to infer the evolution of seed size for ca. 13 000 plant species and found that despite wide divergences in seed size, there was evidence of phylogenetic constraints on this trait. In this paper, diaspore mass and shape showed significant differences (P
<
0.05) among APG groups, indicating that the phylogenetic factor was one of the prerequisites for adaptation. This may suggest that phylogeny imposes limits to variability in reproductive traits within a clade, because of similar developmental and design constrains in related species. Miles and Dunham [32] also pointed out that any comparative study lacking a phylogenetic perspective would be incomplete.Vegetative periods of plants have a close relationship with adaptation to interference [33]. In this paper, diaspore mass showed significant differences (P
<
0.05) among vegetative periods in general, while the variance in shape did not show much difference among vegetative periods. It was indicated that diaspore mass was more effective than diaspore shape in seed dispersal between different vegetative periods in this area.Diaspore mass and shape are also related to vegetation dynamics [33]. Diaspore mass and shape showed no significant differences (P
>
0.05) among ecotypes overall, but the species of xerophyte had a far greater average mass than mesophyte, indicating that xerophyte plants often increased diaspore mass to reduce the displacement and increase the probability of effective colonization. Harel et al. [34] found that seed mass significantly decreased with increasing aridity and rainfall variability in seven out of fifteen in the hot desert of Israel. Butler et al. [33] reported that seed diameter and size in high-rainfall sites trended to have smaller seeds in the rain forest of Australia. Thus, we inferred that diaspore mass might be related with the rainfall or moisture in different ecosystems; in other words, plants in the drier environments produced larger diaspore mass.Diaspore mass and shape showed significant differences among dispersal syndromes, which indicated that both of them were key factors in determining the dispersal syndrome. Moles et al. [35] had investigated a total of 11481 species from 10 vegetation type categories and found that in 40–50 latitude zone, seeds trend to wind dispersal, but this data is absent in the cold desert. In this paper, diaspores of 45 species were light and round shape (single mass less than 1 mg and three-dimensional mean variance less than 0.090), in which there were 21 species (46.67%) as annual herbaceous or ephemeral plants, tending to take the wind for large-scale dispersal, while the heavy or irregularly shaped (often as a result of the existence of appendage) fruits often disperse in virtue of animals or self-transmission [4, 6]. Our data proves this theory could be expanded in this cold desert. In addition, Thomson et al. [36] used generalized linear mixed models with basic life-history and ecological traits to predict seed dispersal mechanisms and found that actual dispersal mechanisms (c.50% correct) was equally well to inferred dispersal mechanisms by the model; whether this model is also suitable for this desert still needs to be examined in the future.This phylogenetic pattern of diaspore mass was previously shown in different floras [37]. In this study, we synthesized information on phylogenetic, life history, and ecological factors, using unique stepwise ANOVAs to infer the correlations between diaspore mass/shape and phylogeny, life history, and ecotype. The result of this study showed that variance in diaspore mass and shape among these 150 species is largely dependent upon phylogeny and seed dispersal syndromes. Therefore, it was suggested that phylogeny may constrain diaspore mass, and as dispersal syndromes may be related to phylogeny, they also constrain diaspore mass and shape. That is, inherent characteristics of species may play a prominent role in evolution of diaspore mass and shape, and stochastic factors such as environmental conditions are also important selective pressures.


### 4.2. Diaspore Morphological Characteristics and Dispersal Syndrome Adaptative to the Desert Environment

Plants growing in the Gurbantunggut Desert developed relevant diaspore morphology characteristics and dispersal syndromes adaptative to the desert environment in the long-term evolution. The Gurbantunggut Desert had a typical arid climate, including deeply buried groundwater and lack of surface runoff; most survivors in this environment were xerophyte plants [21]. Haloxylon persicum community developed well at the top and upper section of sand dunes, accompanied by Stipagrostis adscensionis, Stipagrostis pennata, Eremosparton songoricum, and Agriophyllum squarrosum, and so forth. Therefore, plants growing on moving sand dunes often had middle (Haloxylon persicum) or large (Eremosparton songoricum) weighted diaspores. Some of them were slim shaped although light weight (Stipagrostis adscensionis, Stipagrostis pennata, Corispermum lehmannianum, etc.), being effective against long-distance dispersal and in occupying the surrounding optimizational environment [15]. On the other hand, there were extensive biological soil crusts at the bottom and lower section of sand dunes, which played an important role in sand-fixation [22]. Plants living here must develop their diaspores to adapt the uniform and dense “shell” [38, 39]; thus they were generally small and light or had appendages which enable them to effectively disperse by the wind, pass through the cracks of the biological soil crusts, and settle down, such as Erodium oxyrrhynchum, Stipagrostis adscensionis, and S. pennata, which could take a special way named “active drill” into soil cracks using awns or needles. The small diaspore of Bassia dasyphylla, Bassia sedoides, Kochia iranica, and Camphorosma monspeliaca had hooks/spines or short hairs, and enabled them to dispese via wind or animal Genus Nitraria had bright and juicy berries, which could attract animals feeding in order to improve wide-ranged dispersal. In contrast, most species of Fabaceae and Zygophyllaceae which had large and heavy diaspores, such as genusGlycyrrhiza, Sophora alopecuroides, and Zygophyllum fabago, mainly used to take full advantage of the favorable surrounding nutritional conditions. Thomson et al. [40] found that once a plant height was accounted for, the small-seeded species dispersed further than did large-seeded species. Our results were focusing only on diaspore mass and morphological characteristics, not taking into account plant height. In the future study, we will try to reveal whether small-seeded species may disperse further from the parent plant, accounting for plant height, than do large-seeded species in this desert?There was a certain proportion of salt desert and salinity wasteland in Gurbantunggut Desert peripheral areas especially on the southern edge, where distributing a variety of typical halophytes or wide adaptable plants [21]. Among them, Althaea officinalis, Dodartia orientalis, Peganum harmala, and most species of Amaranthaceae had small and light diaspores (single dry weight less than 1 mg) and close to spherical (three-dimensional mean variance less than 0.090). They were not only easy to disperse by wind but also effective at forming persistent soil seed bank [8, 9, 13, 26]. Typical halophytes of genusAtriplex, Anabasis, Halogeton, and Salsola were usually wind-borne with the flat wing-like appendages, but when the rainfall was enough they could also drift on the water surface to a farther place.Mesophyte was also an important part of the flora and a majority of them were weeds. Their diaspores were small, and light mass, they effectively improved the dispersal range and effective reproductive rate, such asHeliotropium ellipticum, Eragrostis minor, Hyoscyamus niger, and many species of Brassicaceae and Labiatae. Diaspores with appendages like wings/bracts or pappus/hairs were generally wind-borne and those with hooks/spines were easy to stick on animals for long-distance spread or insert into soil cracks to settle. Besides, diaspores of Plantago lessingii, mostly Brassicaceae and Labiatae mesophyte plants had mucilage which is an effective means to resist against environmental and man-made interference.On the surface, the brown-color which was close to the sand color could help them to avoid been eaten by ants. However, it was found that the diaspore color and ant dispersal had no significant relationship (Z
=
-
1.109, P
=
0.267). It may suggest that the ant could not see the diaspore color; they looked for the food relying on the seed appendage or elaiosome. It was concluded that diaspore morphology characteristics and dispersal syndromes would cause some adaptive changes due to different settling environments.In general, the diaspore characteristics were closely related to phylogeny, vegetative periods, dispersal syndromes and ecotype, and these characteristics allowed the plants to adapt extreme desert environments. Diaspore characteristics of plants in this area are influenced by natural selection forces. This study has provided new insights into diaspore characteristics and their ecological adaptation in this cold desert. However, there are still many unanswered questions concerning key aspects of the dispersal traits. These are key research questions arising from this study, and important ones that will need to be addressed in the future.


## 4.1. Comparison of Diaspore Mass and Shape among APG, Vegetative Periods, Ecotypes, and Dispersal Syndromes

Diaspore mass might be the result of both selective pressures over a long-term ecological process and the constraints over the long-standing evolutionary history of the taxonomic group. Phylogenetic effects on life history traits have been interpreted as “phylogenetic constraints,” defined as “properties shared by the members of a monophyletic group by virtue of their common ancestry, which limits the response of these taxon to directional selection” [1]. Similarly, Moles et al. [30, 31] used phylogenetic analyses to infer the evolution of seed size for ca. 13 000 plant species and found that despite wide divergences in seed size, there was evidence of phylogenetic constraints on this trait. In this paper, diaspore mass and shape showed significant differences (P
<
0.05) among APG groups, indicating that the phylogenetic factor was one of the prerequisites for adaptation. This may suggest that phylogeny imposes limits to variability in reproductive traits within a clade, because of similar developmental and design constrains in related species. Miles and Dunham [32] also pointed out that any comparative study lacking a phylogenetic perspective would be incomplete.Vegetative periods of plants have a close relationship with adaptation to interference [33]. In this paper, diaspore mass showed significant differences (P
<
0.05) among vegetative periods in general, while the variance in shape did not show much difference among vegetative periods. It was indicated that diaspore mass was more effective than diaspore shape in seed dispersal between different vegetative periods in this area.Diaspore mass and shape are also related to vegetation dynamics [33]. Diaspore mass and shape showed no significant differences (P
>
0.05) among ecotypes overall, but the species of xerophyte had a far greater average mass than mesophyte, indicating that xerophyte plants often increased diaspore mass to reduce the displacement and increase the probability of effective colonization. Harel et al. [34] found that seed mass significantly decreased with increasing aridity and rainfall variability in seven out of fifteen in the hot desert of Israel. Butler et al. [33] reported that seed diameter and size in high-rainfall sites trended to have smaller seeds in the rain forest of Australia. Thus, we inferred that diaspore mass might be related with the rainfall or moisture in different ecosystems; in other words, plants in the drier environments produced larger diaspore mass.Diaspore mass and shape showed significant differences among dispersal syndromes, which indicated that both of them were key factors in determining the dispersal syndrome. Moles et al. [35] had investigated a total of 11481 species from 10 vegetation type categories and found that in 40–50 latitude zone, seeds trend to wind dispersal, but this data is absent in the cold desert. In this paper, diaspores of 45 species were light and round shape (single mass less than 1 mg and three-dimensional mean variance less than 0.090), in which there were 21 species (46.67%) as annual herbaceous or ephemeral plants, tending to take the wind for large-scale dispersal, while the heavy or irregularly shaped (often as a result of the existence of appendage) fruits often disperse in virtue of animals or self-transmission [4, 6]. Our data proves this theory could be expanded in this cold desert. In addition, Thomson et al. [36] used generalized linear mixed models with basic life-history and ecological traits to predict seed dispersal mechanisms and found that actual dispersal mechanisms (c.50% correct) was equally well to inferred dispersal mechanisms by the model; whether this model is also suitable for this desert still needs to be examined in the future.This phylogenetic pattern of diaspore mass was previously shown in different floras [37]. In this study, we synthesized information on phylogenetic, life history, and ecological factors, using unique stepwise ANOVAs to infer the correlations between diaspore mass/shape and phylogeny, life history, and ecotype. The result of this study showed that variance in diaspore mass and shape among these 150 species is largely dependent upon phylogeny and seed dispersal syndromes. Therefore, it was suggested that phylogeny may constrain diaspore mass, and as dispersal syndromes may be related to phylogeny, they also constrain diaspore mass and shape. That is, inherent characteristics of species may play a prominent role in evolution of diaspore mass and shape, and stochastic factors such as environmental conditions are also important selective pressures.


## 4.2. Diaspore Morphological Characteristics and Dispersal Syndrome Adaptative to the Desert Environment

Plants growing in the Gurbantunggut Desert developed relevant diaspore morphology characteristics and dispersal syndromes adaptative to the desert environment in the long-term evolution. The Gurbantunggut Desert had a typical arid climate, including deeply buried groundwater and lack of surface runoff; most survivors in this environment were xerophyte plants [21]. Haloxylon persicum community developed well at the top and upper section of sand dunes, accompanied by Stipagrostis adscensionis, Stipagrostis pennata, Eremosparton songoricum, and Agriophyllum squarrosum, and so forth. Therefore, plants growing on moving sand dunes often had middle (Haloxylon persicum) or large (Eremosparton songoricum) weighted diaspores. Some of them were slim shaped although light weight (Stipagrostis adscensionis, Stipagrostis pennata, Corispermum lehmannianum, etc.), being effective against long-distance dispersal and in occupying the surrounding optimizational environment [15]. On the other hand, there were extensive biological soil crusts at the bottom and lower section of sand dunes, which played an important role in sand-fixation [22]. Plants living here must develop their diaspores to adapt the uniform and dense “shell” [38, 39]; thus they were generally small and light or had appendages which enable them to effectively disperse by the wind, pass through the cracks of the biological soil crusts, and settle down, such as Erodium oxyrrhynchum, Stipagrostis adscensionis, and S. pennata, which could take a special way named “active drill” into soil cracks using awns or needles. The small diaspore of Bassia dasyphylla, Bassia sedoides, Kochia iranica, and Camphorosma monspeliaca had hooks/spines or short hairs, and enabled them to dispese via wind or animal Genus Nitraria had bright and juicy berries, which could attract animals feeding in order to improve wide-ranged dispersal. In contrast, most species of Fabaceae and Zygophyllaceae which had large and heavy diaspores, such as genusGlycyrrhiza, Sophora alopecuroides, and Zygophyllum fabago, mainly used to take full advantage of the favorable surrounding nutritional conditions. Thomson et al. [40] found that once a plant height was accounted for, the small-seeded species dispersed further than did large-seeded species. Our results were focusing only on diaspore mass and morphological characteristics, not taking into account plant height. In the future study, we will try to reveal whether small-seeded species may disperse further from the parent plant, accounting for plant height, than do large-seeded species in this desert?There was a certain proportion of salt desert and salinity wasteland in Gurbantunggut Desert peripheral areas especially on the southern edge, where distributing a variety of typical halophytes or wide adaptable plants [21]. Among them, Althaea officinalis, Dodartia orientalis, Peganum harmala, and most species of Amaranthaceae had small and light diaspores (single dry weight less than 1 mg) and close to spherical (three-dimensional mean variance less than 0.090). They were not only easy to disperse by wind but also effective at forming persistent soil seed bank [8, 9, 13, 26]. Typical halophytes of genusAtriplex, Anabasis, Halogeton, and Salsola were usually wind-borne with the flat wing-like appendages, but when the rainfall was enough they could also drift on the water surface to a farther place.Mesophyte was also an important part of the flora and a majority of them were weeds. Their diaspores were small, and light mass, they effectively improved the dispersal range and effective reproductive rate, such asHeliotropium ellipticum, Eragrostis minor, Hyoscyamus niger, and many species of Brassicaceae and Labiatae. Diaspores with appendages like wings/bracts or pappus/hairs were generally wind-borne and those with hooks/spines were easy to stick on animals for long-distance spread or insert into soil cracks to settle. Besides, diaspores of Plantago lessingii, mostly Brassicaceae and Labiatae mesophyte plants had mucilage which is an effective means to resist against environmental and man-made interference.On the surface, the brown-color which was close to the sand color could help them to avoid been eaten by ants. However, it was found that the diaspore color and ant dispersal had no significant relationship (Z
=
-
1.109, P
=
0.267). It may suggest that the ant could not see the diaspore color; they looked for the food relying on the seed appendage or elaiosome. It was concluded that diaspore morphology characteristics and dispersal syndromes would cause some adaptive changes due to different settling environments.In general, the diaspore characteristics were closely related to phylogeny, vegetative periods, dispersal syndromes and ecotype, and these characteristics allowed the plants to adapt extreme desert environments. Diaspore characteristics of plants in this area are influenced by natural selection forces. This study has provided new insights into diaspore characteristics and their ecological adaptation in this cold desert. However, there are still many unanswered questions concerning key aspects of the dispersal traits. These are key research questions arising from this study, and important ones that will need to be addressed in the future.



---

*Source: 510343-2014-01-30.xml*