# Antibiotic-Resistant Vibrios in Farmed Shrimp

Authors: Renata Albuquerque Costa; Rayza Lima Araújo; Oscarina Viana Souza; Regine Helena Silva dos Fernandes Vieira
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern was determined in 100 strains ofVibrio isolated from the Litopenaeus vannamei shrimp and identified phenotypically. A high antibiotic-resistance index (75%) was observed, with the following phenotypic profiles: monoresistance (n=42), cross-resistance to β-lactams (n=20) and multiple resistance (n=13). Plasmid resistance was characterized for penicillin (n=11), penicillin + ampicillin (n=1), penicillin + aztreonam (n=1), and ampicillin (n=1). Resistance to antimicrobial drugs by the other strains (n=86) was possibly mediated by chromosomal genes. The findings of this study support the conclusion that the cultured shrimps can be vehicles of vibrios resistant to β-lactam and tetracycline.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Bacteria of theVibrio genus occur naturally in marine, estuarine, and freshwater environments [1] and are notably described as shrimp pathogens [2]. Studies indicate that the antibiotic resistance of vibrios isolated from penaeid culture environment is not unusual [3–5], a fact that apparently constitutes a problem to this type of aquaculture activity [6]. In addition, there is the risk of environmental impact, since the use of antibacterial agents as prophylactic measure in aquaculture favors the selection of resistant bacteria, increasing the probability of transferring resistant genes to human pathogens and land animals [7].Considering the importance of researching the occurrence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in marine invertebrates intended for human consumption, this study aimed to determine the susceptibility pattern to antibacterial drugs of vibrios isolated from the hemolymph ofLitopenaeus vannamei shrimp.


## 2. Materials and Methods

A total of 100Vibrio strains from the bacterial collection of the Microbiology Laboratory at the Environmental and Fish-Sea Sciences Institute (LABOMAR-UFC) were used in this experiment. Only strains previously identified by phenotyping were used [8]. The 100 strains, isolated from the hemolymph ofLitopenaeus vannamei, were subjected to identification by a set of biochemical keys [9], using the following tests: arginine dihydrolase, lysine decarboxylase and ornithine decarboxylase, oxidase, indole,ortho-nitrophenyl-β-galactoside (ONPG), Voges-Proskauer, D-glucosamine cs, growth at 0%, 3%, 8%, and 10% NaCl, growth at 40° and 4°C, citrate, gelatinase, urease, resistance to O/129, and acid from glucose, sucrose, arabinose, mannitol, and melibiose. The strains had consonant phenotypic profiles with the speciesV. navarrensis (n=53),V. brasiliensis (n=15),V. parahaemolyticus (n=10),V. xuii (n=8),V. coralliilyticus (n=5),V. cholerae (n=4),V. neptunius (n=2),V. alginolyticus (n=1),V. diazotrophicus (n=1), andV. vulnificus B3 (n=1).All isolates (n=100) were submitted to antibiotic susceptibility pattern tests by disk diffusion method [9]. For the present study, antibiotics used in shrimp industry [4] and human clinical [10] were selected. The following antimicrobials (Laborclin) were tested: nalidixic acid (Nal 30 μg), ampicillin (Amp 10 μg), aztreonam (Atm 30 μg), cephalothin (Cpl 30 μg), ceftriaxone (Cro 30 μg), ciprofloxacin (Cip 5 μg), chloramphenicol (Clo 30 μg), streptomycin (Est 10 μg), gentamicin (Gen 10 μg), imipenem (Ipm 10 μg), nitrofurantoin (Nit 300 μg), penicillin (Pen 10 U) sulfazotrim (Sut 25 μg), and tetracycline (Tcy 30 μg). For the antibiogram test, bacterial density was previously adjusted to a 108 UFC mL−1 concentration, by bacterial suspension in saline solution with 1% turbidity equivalent to the McFarland nephelometer scale 0.5. Suspensions with standard densities were inoculated with “swab” in Petri dishes containing Mueller-Hinton Agar (Difco) medium with 1% NaCl, and then antibiotic disks (Laborclin) were applied. The plates were incubated at 35°C/24 h. The inhibition halos were measured (mm) with digital caliper (Digmess) and since there are no breakpoints defined forVibrio, we use the zone diameter interpretive standards for Enterobacteriaceae cited by CLSI [11].In order to determine the antibiotic resistance mediation, resistant strains were selected and subjected to plasmid curing by acridine orange (Sigma A-6014) [12]. All resistant strains were grown in Luria Bertani broth, supplemented with 0.100 mg mL−1 of acridine orange, incubated at 35°C for 24 h. Subsequently, inocula were removed and pour-plated in TSA containing 1% NaCl, incubated at 35°C for 24 h. From TSA growth, antibiogram was performed as mentioned above. The resistance was considered chromosomal when observed after the curing procedure; otherwise, it was characterized as plasmid.


## 3. Results and Discussion

The strains used in this study were subjected to biochemical identification only. For the genusVibrio, the phenotypic identification is still considered not enough, since many species can be misidentified. However, the identification of all strains used was validated [9] and previously published [8].The resistance to at least one antibiotic was observed in 75 strains (Table1). The only species susceptible to all drugs wasV. neptunius. In contrast, resistance was verified and confirmed in allV. parahaemolyticus, V. xuii,V. cholerae,V. alginolyticus,V. diazotrophicus, andV. vulnificus B3 strains. The isolates ofV. navarrensis,V. brasiliensis, andV. coralliilyticus showed high resistance of 71.7%, 60%, and 60%, respectively.Table 1
Antimicrobial resistance in vibrios isolated from the hemolymph ofLitopenaeus vannameishrimp.
Species
n
nR (%)
Resistance
Pen
Tcy
Cpl
Amp
Atm
Cro
V. navarrensis
53
38 (71,7)
32
—
3
2
7
1
V. brasiliensis
15
9 (60)
9
—
4
1
—
—
V. parahaemolyticus
10
10 (100)
10
9
1
3
—
—
V. xuii
8
8 (100)
8
—
4
2
—
—
V. coralliilyticus
5
3 (60)
3
—
—
—
—
—
V. cholerae
4
4 (100)
4
3
—
2
1
—
V. neptunius
2
0 (0)
—
—
—
—
—
—
V. alginolyticus
1
1 (100)
1
—
—
—
—
—
V. diazotrophicus
1
1 (100)
—
—
—
—
1
—
V. vulnificusB3
1
1 (100)
1
1
—
—
—
Total
100
75
68
12
12
10
9
1
∗
n: number of isolates. nR: number of resistant isolates. Pen: penicillin G; Tcy: tetracycline; Amp: ampicillin; Cpl: cephalothin; Atm: aztreonam; Cro: ceftriaxone.Table2 describes data related to nine profiles of 75 resistant vibrios. The most frequent profile was the resistance to penicillin alone (n=42), followed by the cross-resistance to β-lactams (n=20) and the multidrug resistance (n=13).Table 2
Antimicrobial resistance pattern in vibrios isolated from the hemolymph ofLitopenaeus vannameishrimp.
Classification
Profile
n
Species (number of resistant isolates)
Monoresistance(n=42)
Pen
38
V. navarrensis (28), V. xuii (4), V.  coralliilyticus(3), V. brasiliensis (2), and V. alginolyticus (1)
Atm
4
V. navarrensis (3) and V. diazotrophicus (1)
Cross-resistance toβ-lactam (n=20)
Pen + Cpl
9
V. navarrensis (3), V. brasiliensis (3), V. xuii (2), and V. parahaemolyticus (1)
Pen + Atm
5
V. navarrensis (4) and V. cholerae (1)
Pen + Amp
2
V. navarrensis (2)
Cro + Atm
1
V. navarrensis (1)
Pen + Cpl + Amp
3
V. xuii (2) and V. brasiliensis (1)
Multiple resistance(n=13)
Pen + Tcy
8
V. parahaemolyticus (6), V. cholerae (1), and V. vulnificus (1)
Pen + Tcy + Amp
5
V. parahaemolyticus (3) and V. cholerae (2)
∗
n: number of resistant isolates; Pen: penicillin G; Tcy: tetracycline; Amp: ampicillin; Cpl: cephalothin; Atm: aztreonam; Cro: ceftriaxone.Vibrios antibiotic-resistant have been detected in different species of shrimp [4, 6, 13–16]. The expression of this type of resistance is often related to inappropriate use of antibacterial drugs in aquaculture [17, 18].In a research on antimicrobial susceptibility pattern ofV. parahaemolyticus derived from shrimp, Bhattacharya et al. [3] revealed the occurrence of strains resistant to ampicillin and sensitive to nalidixic acid and nitrofurantoin. These findings may be compared to the ones from this study, since three strains ofV. parahaemolyticus were resistant to ampicillin, and all were sensitive to the other antibiotics tested (Table 1). Expression of ampicillin [19] and tetracycline [20] resistance by vibrios from shrimp farming regions has been reported.Recently, Laganà et al. [21] isolated from Italian aquaculture (fish, shellfish, and crustaceans) sites bacteria (Vibriospp. andPhotobacterium damsela spp.piscicida) resistant to β-lactams (ampicillin, carbenicillin, mezlocillin, piperacillin, cephalothin, cefazolin, cefuroxime, cefoxitin, ceftazidime, and aztreonam), quinolones (cinoxacin, nalidixic acid, oxolinic acid, and pipemidic acid), potentiated sulfonamides (sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim), polymyxin (colistin sulphate), fosfomycin, tetracycline, and RNA synthesis inhibitors (rifampicin). Our results also showed levels of resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, including cross-resistance (Pen + Cpl, Pen + Atm, Pen + Amp, Cro + Atm, and Pen + Cpl + Amp) (Table 2).In Brazil,Vibrio resistant to antibacterial drugs has been detected in farmed shrimp and cultivation area. Costa et al. [22] detectedVibrio strains resistant to ampicillin, sulfazotrim, and ceftriaxone in samples ofLitopenaeus vannamei shrimp and suggested that the penaeid and its culture environment may constitute the main sources of resistant bacteria. In the present study, a strain with cross-resistance to ceftriaxone and aztreonam was verified; however, there was no resistance to sulfazotrim. Melo et al. [23] reported rates of 90% and 60% antibiotic resistance to ampicillin and amikacin inV. parahaemolyticus strains isolated from pond-rearedL. vannamei. Helena Rebouças et al. [10] showed a high incidence of resistance to ampicillin (45.2%) and to the tetracycline class (38.7%) in vibrios isolated from marine shrimp farming environments.The high rate (68%) of resistance to penicillin G observed in the present study should be emphasized (Tables1 and 2). The occurrence of penicillin-resistant vibrios has already been reported in different penaeid culture areas and regions [6, 24]. Srinivasan and Ramasamy [25] detected 100% resistance to penicillin G in vibrios species associated with viral diseased shrimp in India and alert to the environmental, economic, and management problems that may result from the emergence of drug resistant microbial diseases in aquaculture.Plasmid resistance was characterized for Pen (n=11), Pen + Amp (n=1), Pen + Atm (n=1), and Amp (n=1) (Table 3). Resistance to antimicrobial drugs by the other strains (n=86) was possibly mediated by chromosomal genes.Table 3
Plasmid mediation of antimicrobial resistance in vibrios isolated from the hemolymph ofLitopenaeus vannameishrimp.
Strain code
Species
Resistance profile
Posthealing profile
Resistant
Sensitive
#1
V. coralliilyticus
Pen
—
Pen
#2
V. navarrensis
Pen
—
Pen
#3
V. navarrensis
Pen + Amp
—
Pen + Amp
#4
V. navarrensis
Pen + Amp
Pen
Amp
#9
V. navarrensis
Pen
—
Pen
#10
V. navarrensis
Pen
—
Pen
#17
V. navarrensis
Pen + Atm
—
Pen + Atm
#18
V. navarrensis
Pen + Atm
Atm
Pen
#36
V. navarrensis
Pen
—
Pen
#56
V. navarrensis
Pen
—
Pen
#69
V. navarrensis
Pen + Atm
Atm
Pen
#74
V. brasiliensis
Pen
—
Pen
#94
V. brasiliensis
Pen
—
Pen
#98
V. brasiliensis
Pen
—
Pen
∗Pen: penicillin; Amp: ampicillin; Atm: aztreonam.In the present study only phenotypic detection of plasmids was performed. The curing by acridines has been used since 1960s and normally involves loss of the whole plasmid [26]. In 1970s, Dastidar et al. [27] demonstrated the efficiency of acridine orange in the elimination of R plasmids inVibrio cholerae multidrug-resistant strains. The acridine orange eliminates plasmids from prokaryotic cells [28], and although the conventional methods for curing plasmids by curing agents may induce mutations in the host chromosomal DNA [29], its use in plasmid detection is still being reported in clinical strains [30] and animal/environmental isolates [11, 31, 32].In 13 strains, the resistance to penicillin G was characterized as plasmid (Table3). In bacteria of the genusVibrio, the existence of penicillin-resistant encoding plasmid was suggested by Reid and Amyes [33], who described plasmid SAR-1 as capable of hydrolyzing the antibiotics carbenicillin and penicillin G. According to the authors, the most common resistance mechanism to β-lactam antibiotics is the production of β-lactamase enzymes, which hydrolyze the antibiotic and inactivate it.We detected two strains with the plasmid resistance to ampicillin (Table3). Teo et al. [34] associated the ampicillin resistance in vibrios with a possible via of mediation by β-lactamaseblaVHW-1 andblaVHH-1 genes of approximately 60 kb present in plasmids.Molina-Aja et al. [12], in a study of plasmid pattern and antibiotic resistance inVibrio strains isolated from penaeid, detected an incidence of isolates resistant to cephalothin higher than the present study, with 36.1% of the strains carrying resistance to this β-lactam. The same authors attributed to a 21,226 pb plasmid the ability to encode the resistance to cephalothin, thus characterizing that resistance as plasmid. This result should not be compared to the ones in the present study, since the resistance to cephalothin observed in 12 strains was, possibly, of chromosome nature.


## 4. Conclusions

The findings of this study support the conclusion that the cultured shrimps can be vehicles of vibrios resistant toβ-lactam and tetracycline. Thus, the emergence of resistant bacteria to antibacterial drugs may be indicative of the indiscriminate use of these drugs in the cultivation of aquatic organisms. Furthermore, the detection of resistance mediated by mobile genetic elements, plasmids, serves as alert to the possibility of horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes among bacteria.



---

*Source: 505914-2015-03-30.xml*