# Comparison of DNA Extraction Protocols and Molecular Targets to Diagnose Tuberculous Meningitis

Authors: Flavia Silva Palomo; Martha Gabriela Celle Rivero; Milene Gonçalves Quiles; Fernando Pereira Pinto; Antonia Maria de Oliveira Machado; Antonio Carlos Campos Pignatari
Journal: Tuberculosis Research and Treatment
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is a severe form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. The aims of this study were to evaluate in-house molecular diagnostic protocols of DNA extraction directly from CSF samples and the targets amplified by qPCR as an accurate and fast diagnosis of TBM. One hundred CSF samples from 68 patients suspected of TBM were studied. Four DNA extraction techniques (phenol-chloroform-thiocyanate guanidine, silica thiocyanate guanidine, resin, and resin with ethanol) were compared and CSF samples were used to determine the best target (IS6110,MPB64, andhsp65 KDa) by qPCR. The extraction protocol using the phenol-chloroform-thiocyanate guanidine showed the best results in terms of quantification and sensitivity of PCR amplification, presenting up to 10 times more DNA than the second best protocol, the silica guanidine thiocyanate. The target that showed the best result for TBM diagnosis was theIS6110. This target showed 91% sensitivity and 97% specificity when we analyzed the results by sample and showed 100% sensitivity and 98% specificity when we analyzed the results by patient. The DNA extraction with phenol-chloroform-thiocyanate guanidine followed byIS6110 target amplification has been shown to be suitable for diagnosis of TBM in our clinical setting.


---

## Body

## 1. Background

Tuberculosis is a serious infectious contagious disease that usually affects the lungs but can also affect other organs such as kidney, bone, and central nervous system (CNS) [1]. In 2011, cases of extra pulmonary tuberculosis in Brazil reached almost 16% of all cases of the disease [2] and about 6.3% of these (1.3% of the total) were TBM [3].The TBM is the most severe form of extra pulmonary tuberculosis that has a high morbidity and mortality [4, 5]. The definitive diagnosis of TBM depends on theM. tuberculosis agent detection from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Routinely, the survey ofM. tuberculosis in CSF is carried out by conventional microbiological methods including Ziehl-Neelsen smear, which has low sensitivity (0–20%) and culture, which requires until 65 days to final result [1, 6].The sensibility for detection ofM. tuberculosis in CSF samples can be substantially increased from 70% to 100% and the time required to release laboratory results can be significantly decreased with the use molecular methods, including the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The rapid identification of TBM through molecular analysis of CSF is an important factor for proper and early institution of antimicrobial treatment [7–9].The aims of this study were to evaluate in-house molecular diagnostic protocols of DNA extraction directly from CSF samples and the targets amplified by qPCR as an accurate and fast diagnosis of TBM.


## 2. Methods

### 2.1. Clinical CSF Samples

We utilized the CSF samples sent for mycobacteria culture at the Central Laboratory of São Paulo Hospital, Federal University of São Paulo/UNIFESP, Brazil, in the period from January 2011 to June 2014. Aliquots were frozen at −20°C and submitted to molecular tests after being thawed and centrifuged. These samples were also subjected to biochemical and cytological analysis and determination of adenosine deaminase (ADA) levels.The samples were classified as true positive and negative after a survey in the database “BrazilianTBweb”, other laboratory CSF data and evaluation of medical records.


### 2.2. Microbiological Diagnostic of CSF Samples

The microbial diagnosis of CSF samples was made in the Central Laboratory of São Paulo Hospital, Federal University of São Paulo/UNIFESP, Brazil. For each CSF a Ziehl-Neelsen smear and mycobacterium culture in Lowenstein Jensen solid medium were done.


### 2.3. DNA Extraction Protocols

Four extraction methods were analyzed: phenol-chloroform with guanidine thiocyanate (Brazol®, LabTrade, Brazil), silica-guanidine plus thiocyanate plus guanidine thiocyanate (QIAmp® DNA Mini Kit, Qiagen, USA), resin (Chelex® 100 resin, BioRad, USA), and resin precipitated with ethanol.Comparison of extraction was determined by a serial 10-fold dilutions prepared in four different diluents (ultrapure water, turbid, xanthochromic, and hemorrhagic CSF pools known negative for TBM) from a 0.5 McFarland (1.5 × 108 CFU/mL) suspension ofM. tuberculosis ATCC 25177.The extracted DNA was measured and analyzed by NanoVue ND-100 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, USA) and the amplification sensitivity was determined byIS6110 target. The DNA extraction protocol presenting the best results was chosen for target and clinical samples analysis.Phenol-Chloroform-Thiocyanate Guanidine (Brazol, LabTrade, Brazil) DNA Extraction. An aliquot of 200 μL CSF sample sediment was added to a microtube containing 500 μL of Brazol and mixture. Then ice-cold chloroform (300 μL) was added. The mixture was homogenized and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 minutes at 8°C. The supernatant was removed and transferred to another microtube containing 500 μL of cold absolute ethanol. The mixture was stirred for 3–5 seconds by vortexing and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 minutes at 8°C. The supernatant was removed and the “pellet” was washed with 500 μL of ice-cold ethanol and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 minutes at 8°C. The supernatant was carefully removed and discarded. The “pellet” was incubated at room temperature to dryness and then dissolved in 30 μL of ultrapure water (Invitrogen Life Technologies, USA) and allowed to dissolve at 65°C for 30 minutes. The samples were frozen at −20°C when not used immediately.Silica-Guanidine Thiocyanate (QIAamp DNA Mini Kit, Qiagen, USA) DNA Extraction. The protocol recommended by the manufacturer was used with 200 μL of the CSF sediment.Resin (Resin Chelex100, BioRad, USA) DNA Extraction. A 200 μL aliquot of the CSF sample pellet was placed in 300 μL of a 10% solution Chelex. This mixture was homogenized in vortex for 10 seconds, centrifuged quickly to remove excess fluid from the cover, and incubated at 95°C for 30 minutes in a heat block. The tube was homogenized for 15 sec and centrifuged for 5 minutes at 13000 rpm. The supernatant containing the extracted DNA was transferred to a new tube. When not used immediately, the sample was frozen at −20°C.Resin Precipitated with Ethanol (Chelex100 Resin, BioRad, USA) DNA Extraction. A 200 μL aliquot of the CSF pellet was placed in 300 μL of 10% solution Chelex. This mixture was homogenized in vortex for 10 seconds and centrifuged quickly to remove excess fluid from the cover. This mixture was incubated at 95°C for 30 minutes in a heat block. The tube was homogenized for 15 sec and centrifuged for 5 minutes at 13000 rpm. The supernatant containing the extracted DNA was transferred to a new tube and 500 μL of cold absolute ethanol was added. The mixture was stirred for 3–5 seconds by vortexing and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 minutes at 8°C. The “pellet” was washed with 500 μL of ice-cold ethanol and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 minutes at 8°C. The supernatant was carefully removed and discarded. The “pellet” was incubated at room temperature to dryness and then dissolved in 30 μL of ultrapure water (Invitrogen Life Technologies, USA) and allowed to dissolve at 65°C for 30 minutes. The samples were frozen at −20°C when not utilized immediately.


### 2.4. Targets and PCR Protocols

Three different targets were analyzed forM. tuberculosis detection by real time PCR:IS6110 gene, 65 kDa Heat Shock Protein gene(hsp65 KDa), and the MPB64 protein encoding gene(MPB64) (Table 1). The reaction was performed on Rotor-Gene 5 plex/HRM platform (Qiagen, USA) by melting analyses (QuantiFast SYBR Green PCR (Qiagen, USA)) on 20 μL final volume. The limit of detection (LoD) was determined by a serial sevenfold dilutions prepared in ultrapure water (Sigma-Aldrich, Co. Ltd, Saint Louis, US).Table 1
Real time PCR targets primers.
Target
Primer
Sequence (5′-3′)
Product
Reference
IS6110
IS-Fw
CGTGAGGGCATCGAGGTGGC
245 bp
[9]
IS-Rv
CGCTAGGCGTCGGTGACAAA
Hsp 65 KDa
hsp65-Fw
GAGATCGAGCTGGAGGATCC
383 bp
[7]
hsp65-Rv
AGCTGCAGCCCAAAGGTGTT
MPB64
MPB64-Fw
TCCGCTGCCAGTCGTCTTCC
240 bp
[7]
MPB64-Rv
GTCCTCGCAGTCTAGGCCA
Note. Fw: forward; Rv: reverse; bp: base pairs of nucleotidis.The target specificity was carried out by testing the negative control group and CSF samples. The negative control group was made up by ATCC and known strains of bacteria, yeasts, and other mycobacteria (Table2).Table 2
List of microorganisms used as negative control.
Microorganisms
Origin
Acinetobacter baumannii
ATCC 19606
Candidaspp.
Known strain
Cryptococcus neoformans
Known strain
Enterococcus faecalis
ATCC 29212
Enterococcus faecium
Known strain
Escherichia coli
ATCC 35218
Haemophilus influenzae
Known strain
Haemophilusspp.
Known strain
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Known strain
Listeria monocytogenes
Known strain
Mycobacterium chelonae
Known strain
Mycobacterium abscessus
Known strain
Mycobacterium avium
Known strain
Mycobacterium gordonae
Known strain
Mycobacterium intracellulare
Known strain
Mycobacterium kansasii
Known strain
Mycobacterium lentiflavum
Known strain
Neisseria meningitidis
Known strain
Neisseriaspp.
Known strain
Nocardiaspp.
Known strain
Proteus mirabilis
ATCC 29245
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
ATCC 27853
Salmonella enterica
ATCC 14028
Shigella flexneri
ATCC 12022
Staphylococcus aureus
ATCC 29213
Staphylococcus epidermidis
ATCC 12228
Staphylococcus saprophyticus
ATCC 43867
Streptococcus agalactiae
ATCC 12386
Streptococcus pneumoniae
ATCC 49619
Streptococcus pyogenes
ATCC 19615
ATCC: American Type Collection Culture.


### 2.5. Real Time PCR Protocol

A reaction containing 10μL of QuantiFast SYBR Green PCR (Qiagen, USA), 0.5 mM of each primer, and 2 μL of sample was used forM. tuberculosis DNA detection directly from the CSF sample. Thermocycling was performed in the PCR system in the real time Rotor-Gene Q 5plex Platform (Qiagen, USA) using the following conditions: an initial cycle of five minutes at 95°C, followed by 45 cycles of 30 seconds at 94°C and 45 seconds at the respective annealing temperature for IS6110 (65°C), hsp65 KDa (62°C), and MPB64 (61°C). At the conclusion of cycling a melting step ranging from 72°C to 95°C with an increase of 0.5°C per second was added for each gene.


### 2.6. Statistical Analysis

The results obtained were compared and evaluated clinically and analytically. For each test sensitivity (S), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy (A) were calculated. TheKappa index (k) was used to analyze the correlation between the tests. For analytical comparison, mycobacteria culture was considered as gold standard. For clinical analysis the patients and their respective samples were classified as true positive and true negative in accordance with the result of mycobacterium culture and clinical and laboratory data. Clinical data of patients were collected from electronic medical records and laboratory reports provided by the Central Laboratory of Hospital São Paulo and records in Brazilian TBweb (http://www.cvetb.saude.sp.gov.br/).


## 2.1. Clinical CSF Samples

We utilized the CSF samples sent for mycobacteria culture at the Central Laboratory of São Paulo Hospital, Federal University of São Paulo/UNIFESP, Brazil, in the period from January 2011 to June 2014. Aliquots were frozen at −20°C and submitted to molecular tests after being thawed and centrifuged. These samples were also subjected to biochemical and cytological analysis and determination of adenosine deaminase (ADA) levels.The samples were classified as true positive and negative after a survey in the database “BrazilianTBweb”, other laboratory CSF data and evaluation of medical records.


## 2.2. Microbiological Diagnostic of CSF Samples

The microbial diagnosis of CSF samples was made in the Central Laboratory of São Paulo Hospital, Federal University of São Paulo/UNIFESP, Brazil. For each CSF a Ziehl-Neelsen smear and mycobacterium culture in Lowenstein Jensen solid medium were done.


## 2.3. DNA Extraction Protocols

Four extraction methods were analyzed: phenol-chloroform with guanidine thiocyanate (Brazol®, LabTrade, Brazil), silica-guanidine plus thiocyanate plus guanidine thiocyanate (QIAmp® DNA Mini Kit, Qiagen, USA), resin (Chelex® 100 resin, BioRad, USA), and resin precipitated with ethanol.Comparison of extraction was determined by a serial 10-fold dilutions prepared in four different diluents (ultrapure water, turbid, xanthochromic, and hemorrhagic CSF pools known negative for TBM) from a 0.5 McFarland (1.5 × 108 CFU/mL) suspension ofM. tuberculosis ATCC 25177.The extracted DNA was measured and analyzed by NanoVue ND-100 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, USA) and the amplification sensitivity was determined byIS6110 target. The DNA extraction protocol presenting the best results was chosen for target and clinical samples analysis.Phenol-Chloroform-Thiocyanate Guanidine (Brazol, LabTrade, Brazil) DNA Extraction. An aliquot of 200 μL CSF sample sediment was added to a microtube containing 500 μL of Brazol and mixture. Then ice-cold chloroform (300 μL) was added. The mixture was homogenized and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 minutes at 8°C. The supernatant was removed and transferred to another microtube containing 500 μL of cold absolute ethanol. The mixture was stirred for 3–5 seconds by vortexing and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 minutes at 8°C. The supernatant was removed and the “pellet” was washed with 500 μL of ice-cold ethanol and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 minutes at 8°C. The supernatant was carefully removed and discarded. The “pellet” was incubated at room temperature to dryness and then dissolved in 30 μL of ultrapure water (Invitrogen Life Technologies, USA) and allowed to dissolve at 65°C for 30 minutes. The samples were frozen at −20°C when not used immediately.Silica-Guanidine Thiocyanate (QIAamp DNA Mini Kit, Qiagen, USA) DNA Extraction. The protocol recommended by the manufacturer was used with 200 μL of the CSF sediment.Resin (Resin Chelex100, BioRad, USA) DNA Extraction. A 200 μL aliquot of the CSF sample pellet was placed in 300 μL of a 10% solution Chelex. This mixture was homogenized in vortex for 10 seconds, centrifuged quickly to remove excess fluid from the cover, and incubated at 95°C for 30 minutes in a heat block. The tube was homogenized for 15 sec and centrifuged for 5 minutes at 13000 rpm. The supernatant containing the extracted DNA was transferred to a new tube. When not used immediately, the sample was frozen at −20°C.Resin Precipitated with Ethanol (Chelex100 Resin, BioRad, USA) DNA Extraction. A 200 μL aliquot of the CSF pellet was placed in 300 μL of 10% solution Chelex. This mixture was homogenized in vortex for 10 seconds and centrifuged quickly to remove excess fluid from the cover. This mixture was incubated at 95°C for 30 minutes in a heat block. The tube was homogenized for 15 sec and centrifuged for 5 minutes at 13000 rpm. The supernatant containing the extracted DNA was transferred to a new tube and 500 μL of cold absolute ethanol was added. The mixture was stirred for 3–5 seconds by vortexing and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 minutes at 8°C. The “pellet” was washed with 500 μL of ice-cold ethanol and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 minutes at 8°C. The supernatant was carefully removed and discarded. The “pellet” was incubated at room temperature to dryness and then dissolved in 30 μL of ultrapure water (Invitrogen Life Technologies, USA) and allowed to dissolve at 65°C for 30 minutes. The samples were frozen at −20°C when not utilized immediately.


## 2.4. Targets and PCR Protocols

Three different targets were analyzed forM. tuberculosis detection by real time PCR:IS6110 gene, 65 kDa Heat Shock Protein gene(hsp65 KDa), and the MPB64 protein encoding gene(MPB64) (Table 1). The reaction was performed on Rotor-Gene 5 plex/HRM platform (Qiagen, USA) by melting analyses (QuantiFast SYBR Green PCR (Qiagen, USA)) on 20 μL final volume. The limit of detection (LoD) was determined by a serial sevenfold dilutions prepared in ultrapure water (Sigma-Aldrich, Co. Ltd, Saint Louis, US).Table 1
Real time PCR targets primers.
Target
Primer
Sequence (5′-3′)
Product
Reference
IS6110
IS-Fw
CGTGAGGGCATCGAGGTGGC
245 bp
[9]
IS-Rv
CGCTAGGCGTCGGTGACAAA
Hsp 65 KDa
hsp65-Fw
GAGATCGAGCTGGAGGATCC
383 bp
[7]
hsp65-Rv
AGCTGCAGCCCAAAGGTGTT
MPB64
MPB64-Fw
TCCGCTGCCAGTCGTCTTCC
240 bp
[7]
MPB64-Rv
GTCCTCGCAGTCTAGGCCA
Note. Fw: forward; Rv: reverse; bp: base pairs of nucleotidis.The target specificity was carried out by testing the negative control group and CSF samples. The negative control group was made up by ATCC and known strains of bacteria, yeasts, and other mycobacteria (Table2).Table 2
List of microorganisms used as negative control.
Microorganisms
Origin
Acinetobacter baumannii
ATCC 19606
Candidaspp.
Known strain
Cryptococcus neoformans
Known strain
Enterococcus faecalis
ATCC 29212
Enterococcus faecium
Known strain
Escherichia coli
ATCC 35218
Haemophilus influenzae
Known strain
Haemophilusspp.
Known strain
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Known strain
Listeria monocytogenes
Known strain
Mycobacterium chelonae
Known strain
Mycobacterium abscessus
Known strain
Mycobacterium avium
Known strain
Mycobacterium gordonae
Known strain
Mycobacterium intracellulare
Known strain
Mycobacterium kansasii
Known strain
Mycobacterium lentiflavum
Known strain
Neisseria meningitidis
Known strain
Neisseriaspp.
Known strain
Nocardiaspp.
Known strain
Proteus mirabilis
ATCC 29245
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
ATCC 27853
Salmonella enterica
ATCC 14028
Shigella flexneri
ATCC 12022
Staphylococcus aureus
ATCC 29213
Staphylococcus epidermidis
ATCC 12228
Staphylococcus saprophyticus
ATCC 43867
Streptococcus agalactiae
ATCC 12386
Streptococcus pneumoniae
ATCC 49619
Streptococcus pyogenes
ATCC 19615
ATCC: American Type Collection Culture.


## 2.5. Real Time PCR Protocol

A reaction containing 10μL of QuantiFast SYBR Green PCR (Qiagen, USA), 0.5 mM of each primer, and 2 μL of sample was used forM. tuberculosis DNA detection directly from the CSF sample. Thermocycling was performed in the PCR system in the real time Rotor-Gene Q 5plex Platform (Qiagen, USA) using the following conditions: an initial cycle of five minutes at 95°C, followed by 45 cycles of 30 seconds at 94°C and 45 seconds at the respective annealing temperature for IS6110 (65°C), hsp65 KDa (62°C), and MPB64 (61°C). At the conclusion of cycling a melting step ranging from 72°C to 95°C with an increase of 0.5°C per second was added for each gene.


## 2.6. Statistical Analysis

The results obtained were compared and evaluated clinically and analytically. For each test sensitivity (S), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy (A) were calculated. TheKappa index (k) was used to analyze the correlation between the tests. For analytical comparison, mycobacteria culture was considered as gold standard. For clinical analysis the patients and their respective samples were classified as true positive and true negative in accordance with the result of mycobacterium culture and clinical and laboratory data. Clinical data of patients were collected from electronic medical records and laboratory reports provided by the Central Laboratory of Hospital São Paulo and records in Brazilian TBweb (http://www.cvetb.saude.sp.gov.br/).


## 3. Results

Among 100 clinical CSF samples collected from 68 patients, 35 from 16 patients were considered true positive and 65 samples from 52 patients were true negative by clinical parameters.The DNA extraction protocol using the phenol-chloroform-thiocyanate guanidine presented the highest final DNA concentration among four methods evaluated (Table3).Table 3
Nanovue results form four extraction protocols.
Diluent
Extraction method
Sensitivity amplification
DNA [ng/μL]
A260/280
Ultrapure water
Phenol Chloroform
10
-10
24,5
1,53
Silica
10−9
2,3
1,18
Resin
10−7
1,2
0,93
Resin ethanol
10−4
0,3
0,36
Turbid CSF
Phenol Chloroform
10
-10
28,5
1,59
Silica
10
-10
22,2
1,45
Resin
10−7
19
1,08
Resin ethanol
10−3
0,1
0,01
Xanthochromic CSF
Phenol Chloroform
10
-10
53
1,56
Silica
10−9
21
1,8
Resin
10−7
24,5
1,09
Resin ethanol
10−6
0,12
1,4
Hemorrhagic CSF
Phenol Chloroform
10
-10
64,5
1,55
Silica
10
-10
60,8
1,76
Resin
10−7
67
1,22
Resin ethanol
10−6
0,1
2,19From 35 clinical samples considered true positive by clinical parameters for TBM diagnosis, IS6110 PCR was able to detect 32 of them followed by culture andhsp65 KDa (16 samples) andMPB64 (12 samples). (Table 4).Table 4
Culture and real time PCR results for 100 samples included on the study.
S
SP
PPV
NPV
A
K
Culture
46%
100%
100%
77%
81%
0,52 (Weak)
INS6110
91%
97%
94%
95%
95%
0,89 (Strong)
MPB64
34%
97%
86%
73%
75%
0,36 (Minimal)
hsp65 KDa
46%
97%
89%
77%
79%
0,48 (Weak)
Note. S: sensitivity; SP: specificity; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; A: accuracy; k: Kappa index.Sixty-five samples were considered as true negative by clinical parameters for TBM diagnosis and culture was negative for all of them while 63 samples were negative byIS6110,MBP64, andhsp65 KDa PCR. (Table 4).From 16 patients considered true positive by clinical parameters for TBM diagnosis,IS6110 was able to correctly detect all of them followed byhsp65 KDa (11 patients), culture (10 patients), andMBP64(7 samples). (Table 5).Table 5
Culture and real time PCR results for 100 samples included on the study.
S
SP
PPV
NPV
A
K
Culture
63%
100%
100%
90%
91%
0,72 (moderate)
INS6110
100%
98%
94%
100%
99%
0,96 (almost perfect)
MPB64
44%
96%
78%
85%
84%
0,47 (weak)
hsp65 KDa
69%
96%
85%
91%
90%
0,69 (moderate)
Note. S: sensitivity; SP: specificity; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; A: accuracy; k: Kappa index.From 52 patients considered true negative by clinical parameters for TBM diagnosis, the culture was able to detect all of them as negative followed by IS6110 (51 patients), hsp65, and MBP64 (50 samples). (Table5).LoD, efficiency, Ct (cycle threshold) median andTm (temperature of melting) median forIS6110, MPB64,and hsp65 KDa are presented in Table 6. The primers were specific forM. tuberculosisand did not show cross reactivity against different microorganisms tested.Table 6
LoD, efficiency, Ct, and Tm results for real time PCR.
Target
LoD (CFU)
Efficiency
Ct
T
m
Median
Median
IS6110
100
1,07
31,09
89,8
Hsp 65 KDa
102
1,02
25,78
86,8
MPB64
103
1,07
35,07
90,7
LoD: limit of detection; Ct: cycle threshold;Tm: temperature of melting.


## 4. Discussion

Over the years several studies proposed and validated molecular techniques for diagnosis of TBM [8–14]. These studies considered the importance of developing a simple technique that was easily reproduced in laboratories with minimal resources [10, 11, 13, 15, 16]. The choice of the most appropriate extraction method and the target to be amplified are criteria that improve the precision, sensitivity and specificity of the PCR test [16–18].The complexity of rich cell wall lipids of mycobacteria is a limiting factor for the success of some DNA extraction techniques [19–22], besides the fact that the microorganism is an intracellular pathogen, which can hinder the isolation of these microorganisms in clinical samples [19, 22]. Since the CSF samples from patients with TBM are usually paucibacillary it is recommended to recover the greatest amount of DNA as possible.The extraction protocol using the phenol-chloroform-thiocyanate guanidine showed the best results in terms of quantification and sensitivity of PCR amplification, presenting up to 10 times more DNA than the second best protocol, the silica guanidine thiocyanate.The techniques using phenol-chloroform, silica, and thiocyanate guanidine are described as excellent choices for DNA extraction in different biological materials, in addition to being inexpensive and simple [8–13].The methodology of phenol-chloroform extraction and DNA purification utilized the Brazol, which has in its composition in addition to phenol, guanidine thiocyanate, a chaotropic agent that inactivates endonucleases and prevents DNA binding to other molecules and facilitates the separation of cellular debris [23–26]. Furthermore, the phenol which is a potent proteolytic agent, corrosive and caustic, contributes to lysis of the cell envelope of mycobacteria. In phenol extraction, solubilization and denaturation of proteins and lipids occur efficiently [26]. The chloroform used in this method is also a good protein denaturing detergent and a major solvent of fats, which probably contributed to the removal of the lipid layer of the mycobacteria cell wall. Regarding the biohazard risk of phenol-chloroform, all tests were done following the biosafety manuals and chemical waste disposal regulations of our country.The target that showed the best amplification results was theIS6110 qPCR with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 79%, when compared to culture. The sample analysis forIS6110 qPCR amplification showed 91% sensitivity and 97% specificity with the clinical diagnosis. When this analysis was grouped by patient, we showed a very good agreement with the clinical diagnosis with 100% sensitivity and 98% specificity.These results can be explained since the gene encoding theMPB64 protein and the encoding geneheat shock protein (hsp65 KDa) have single copies in mycobacteria genome while the insertion geneIS6110 has multiple copies which makes the reaction more sensitive [7–9].TheIS6110 target sequence is a repetitive insertion of 1,350 base pairs present inM.tuberculosis complex species with different numbers of copies integrated into various chromosomal sites [9, 27, 28]. This molecular target promotes an increase in the sensitivity of the technique, which is an advantage over other targets. Only three patients had positive CSF samples for targetIS6110 undiagnosed for TBM, but when we evaluated other laboratory criteria or clinical characteristics of these patients two of them had TBM and only one remained doubtful.Commercial molecular tests for pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis such as XpertMTB/RIF represent a significant advance, since it is automated and provides fast results. However, for TBM diagnosis its sensitivity is around 60% to 80%. [29–31]. Other targets also can be used forM. tuberculosis molecular diagnosis, including the TRC4 primer a conserved repetitive element with specificity forM. tuberculosiscomplex [32].There are few reports ofM. tuberculosis lacking theIS6110 that eventually could be responsible for false negative results [32, 33]; however, we considered that the benefit of a greater sensitivity of theIS6110 gene that can be found repeatedly in the genomeM. tuberculosis justifies its use [11, 32, 33].Thus, we believe we have demonstrated the feasibility of a molecular test for the diagnosis of TBM by an in-house real time PCR with analytical and clinical correlation to be used in laboratories with adequate cost benefit. Studies comparing other molecular methods of DNA extraction, other molecular targets, in-house protocols, and commercial platforms are warranted.


## 5. Conclusion

The combination of DNA extraction by phenol-chloroform and guanidine thiocyanate, (Brazol) and qPCR byIS6110 target amplification could be an effective tool forM. tuberculosisdiagnosis directly from CSF samples.



---

*Source: 5089046-2017-05-30.xml*