# Study of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells by Scanning Electron Micrograph Observation and Thickness Optimization of PorousTiO2 Electrodes

Authors: Seigo Ito; Mohammad K. Nazeeruddin; Shaik M. Zakeeruddin; Peter Péchy; Pascal Comte; Michael Grätzel; Takaki Mizuno; Atsushi Tanaka; Tsuguo Koyanagi
Journal: International Journal of Photoenergy
 (2009)

---

## Abstract

In order to improve the photoenergy conversion efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs), it is important to optimize their porousTiO2 electrodes.  This paper examines the surface and cross-sectional views of the electrodes using scanning electron micrography. Two types of samples for cross-sectional viewing were prepared by mechanically breaking the substrate and by using an Ar-ion etching beam. The former displays the surface of the TiO2 particles and the latter shows the cross-section of the TiO2 particles. We found interesting surface and cross-sectional structures in the scattering layer containing the 400 nm diameter particles, which have an angular and horned shape. The influence of TiO2 particle size and the thickness of the nanocrystalline-TiO2 electrode in DSCs using four kinds of sensitizing dyes (D149, K19, N719 and Z907) and two kinds of electrolytes (acetonitrile-based and ionic-liquid electrolytes) are discussed in regards to conversion efficiency, which this paper aims to optimize.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) have recently been developed as a cost-effective photovoltaic system due to their low-cost materials and facile processing [1–4]. The production of DSCs involves chemical and thermal processes but no vacuum is involved.  Therefore, DSCs can be fabricated without using expensive equipment.  The use of dyes and nanocrystalline TiO2 is one of the most promising approaches to realize both high performance and low cost.  A high light-to-electricity conversion efficiency can be obtained from a large surface area of porous TiO2 electrodes on which the dyes can be sufficiently adsorbed.In order to fabricate DSC devices characterized by high efficiency (>10%) and/or long-term stability, further understanding and state-of-art techniques are necessary.  The key points of the DSC mechanism are as follows(1)
Ultrafast electron injection from the dye to the TiO2 electrode (<20 femtoseconds) [5].(2)
Fast dye regeneration via reduction byI- (100 nanoseconds without voltage bias) [6].(3)
The very long electron lifetime in the TiO2 electrode to I3-  (>0.1 second below 0.7 V forward bias) [7].(4)
The large roughness factor of the TiO2 electrode (>1600) [8].(5)
The diode effect of Ru dye on the TiO2 electrode [8].(6)
Photon adsorption controlled by the thickness of the TiO2 layers (transparent layer, d=20 nm, 12–14 μm thickness; scattering layer, d=400 nm, 4-5 μm thickness) [9].(7)
A high-activity Pt counter electrode forI-/I3-  redox (<8 Ω) [10].Each point listed above is necessary for high-efficiency DSCs.  One of the key materials is the TiO2 electrode, which has been fabricated by using sol-gel screen printing.  With this method, the TiO2 particle size and the thickness of the nanocrystalline-TiO2 layer (“X” in Figure 1) can be varied, allowing for control of the photovoltage and photocurrent.  Thus, we can optimize the design of the porous TiO2 electrode, the sensitizing dye and the electrolyte.Structure of DSC with single-layer (a) and double-layer (b) structures of nanocrystalline-TiO2electrodes.  X’s in figures show the thickness of nanocrystalline-TiO2 electrodes that was varied for the optimization of high-efficiency DSC (Figures 5, 6 and 7).
(a)(b)In this paper, we study the surface and cross-sectional structure of double-layered porous TiO2 electrodes by SEM observation.  We found significant differences between the SEM images of the original structure composed of submicron particles and those of a structure composed of a mixture of submicron particles and nanoparticles.  The two types of cross-sectional samples were prepared either by mechanically breaking the substrate or using an Ar-ion beam etching technique, resulting in confirmation of the significant difference in the appearance of the two samples and the observation of the interesting angular and horned structure of the 400 nm diameter particles in the cross-sectional view.  Subsequently, the effect of the TiO2 particle size (d=20 nm, 42 nm and 400 nm) and the thickness of the nanocrystalline-TiO2 electrode on the photovoltaic properties of DSCs are evaluated with four kinds of sensitizing dyes (D149, K19, N719 and Z907) and two kinds of electrolytes (acetonitrile (AcCN) based and ionic-liquid (IL) electrolytes) in order to achieve high conversion efficiency.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Materials

Three kinds of screen-printing paste containing different TiO2 (anatase) particles (20 nm [9], 42 nm [11] and 400 nm [9]) were prepared by previously reported procedures. For SEM observations, we used TiO2 materials from JGC Catalysis and Chemicals Ltd. (JGC-CCIC, Japan).  The syntheses of cis-Ru-di(thiocyanato)-N,N′-bis(2,2′-bipyridyl-4-carboxylic acid-4′-tetrabutylammonium carboxylate) (N-719) [12], cis-(SCN)2 (4,4′-dicarboxylic acid-2,2′-bipyridine) (4,4′-dinonyl-2,2′-bipyridine) (Z907) [13], Ru((4,4-dicarboxylic acid-2,2′-bipyridine) (4,4′-bis(p-hexyloxystyryl)-2,2 bipyridine) (NCS)2 (K19) [14] and indoline dye (D149) [15] have been reported in previous papers.  The chromatographic purification of the Ru dyes was carried out on a column of Sephadex LH-20 using a previously reported procedure [9, 12].


### 2.2. Porous TiO2 Electrodes

To prepare the working electrodes, the fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass that was used as the current collector (Nippon Sheet Glass, Solar, 4 mm thickness) was first cleaned in a detergent solution using an ultrasonic bath for 15 minutes and then rinsed with water and ethanol.  After treatment in an UV-O3 system for 18 minutes, the FTO glass plates were immersed in a 40 mM aqueous solution of TiCl4 at 70°C for 30 minutes and washed with water and ethanol.A layer of nanocrystalline-TiO2 paste was coated onto the FTO glass plates by screen printing and kept in a clean box for 3 minutes so that the paste could settle to reduce the irregularity of the surface and then dried for 6 minutes at 125°C.  This screen-printing procedure with the paste (coating, storing and drying) was repeated to obtain a working electrode of appropriate thickness [9].  By adjusting the thickness of the TiO2 pastes, the TiO2 electrodes were designed as shown in Figure 1. The porous TiO2 layers of 20 nm [9], 42 nm [11] and 400 nm [9] were transparent, semitransparent and scattering, respectively.  For the scattering layer, two coatings of macrocrystalline-TiO2 paste were deposited by screen printing, resulting in a light-scattering TiO2 layer of 4–5 μm thickness containing 400 nm-sized anatase particles.  The electrodes coated with the TiO2 pastes were gradually heated under an air flow at 325°C for 5 minutes, at 375°C for 5 minutes, at 450°C for 15 minutes and 500°C for 15 minutes.The sintered TiO2 film was treated with 40 mM TiCl4solution as described above, rinsed with water and ethanol and sintered again at 500°C for 30 minutes.  After cooling to 80°C, the TiO2 electrode was immersed in a 0.5 mM dye solution in a mixture of acetonitrile and tert-butyl alcohol (v/v: 1:1) and kept at room temperature for 20–24 hours (Ru dyes) or 4 hours (D149 with 1.0 mM chenodeoxy cholic acid) to complete the sensitizer uptake.


### 2.3. Pt Counter Electrodes

To prepare the counter electrode, a hole was drilled in the FTO glass (LOF Industries, TEC 15Ω/□, 2.2 mm thickness) by sand blasting. The perforated glass sheet was washed with H2O as well as with a 0.1 M HCl solution in ethanol and cleaned by ultrasound in an acetone bath for 10 minutes.  After removing residual organic contaminants by heating in air for 15 minutes at 400°C, the Pt catalyst was deposited on the FTO glass by coating with a drop of H2PtCl6 solution (3 mg Pt in 1 mL ethanol) and repeating the heat treatment at 400°C for 15 minutes.


### 2.4. DSC Assembly

The dye-covered TiO2 electrode and Pt counter electrode were assembled into a sandwich-type cell and sealed with a hot-melt gasket of 25 μm thickness made of the ionomer Surlyn1702 or liner low density polyethylene Bynel4164 (DuPont) on a heating stage.  A drop of the electrolyte was put on the hole in the back of the counter electrode.  The acetonitrile (AcCN) based electrolyte for N719 was 0.60 M BMII, 0.03 M I2, 0.10 M guanidinium thiocyanate and 0.50 M 4-tert-butylpyridine in a mixture of acetonitrile and valeronitrile (v/v: 85:15) [8–10].  The ionic-liquid (IL) electrolyte for Z907 and K19 was 0.2 M I2, 0.5 M NMBI and 0.1 M GuNCS in a mixture of PMII/EMINCS (v/v: 13:7) [14].  The AcCN-based electrolyte for D149 was 0.10 M lithium iodide, 0.60 M butylmethylimidazolium iodide, 0.05 M I2 and 0.05 M 4-tert-butylpyridine in AcCN:valeronitrile (v/v: 85:15)) [16].  The IL electrolyte for D149 was 0.20 M I2 in 1-methyl-3-propylimidazolium iodide, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis((trifluoromethyl) sulfonyl) imide and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium triflate (v/v/v: 2:1:1) [16].The cell was placed in a small vacuum chamber for a few seconds to remove the inside air.  Exposing it again to ambient pressure caused the electrolyte to be driven into the cell.  Finally, the hole was sealed using a hot-melt liner low density polyethylene film (Bynel 4164, 35μm thickness, Du-Pont) and a cover glass (0.1 mm thickness). In order to have good electrical contact between the connections and the photovoltaic measurement equipment, the edge of the FTO outside of the cell was scraped slightly with sandpaper or a file.  A solder (Cerasolza, Asahi Glass) was applied on each side of the FTO electrodes.


### 2.5. Measurements

Photovoltaic measurements employed an AM 1.5 solar simulator (100 mWcm-2).  Masks made of black plastic tape were attached on the Arctop filter to reduce the scattering of light [17]. The intensity of the simulated light was calibrated by using a reference Si photodiode equipped with an IR cutoff filter (KG-3, Schott) in order to reduce the mismatch in the region of 350–750 nm between the simulated light and AM 1.5 to less than 2% [18].  I-V curves were obtained by applying an external bias voltage to the cell and measuring the generated photocurrent with a digital source meter (Keithley 2400, Keithley Instruments).


## 2.1. Materials

Three kinds of screen-printing paste containing different TiO2 (anatase) particles (20 nm [9], 42 nm [11] and 400 nm [9]) were prepared by previously reported procedures. For SEM observations, we used TiO2 materials from JGC Catalysis and Chemicals Ltd. (JGC-CCIC, Japan).  The syntheses of cis-Ru-di(thiocyanato)-N,N′-bis(2,2′-bipyridyl-4-carboxylic acid-4′-tetrabutylammonium carboxylate) (N-719) [12], cis-(SCN)2 (4,4′-dicarboxylic acid-2,2′-bipyridine) (4,4′-dinonyl-2,2′-bipyridine) (Z907) [13], Ru((4,4-dicarboxylic acid-2,2′-bipyridine) (4,4′-bis(p-hexyloxystyryl)-2,2 bipyridine) (NCS)2 (K19) [14] and indoline dye (D149) [15] have been reported in previous papers.  The chromatographic purification of the Ru dyes was carried out on a column of Sephadex LH-20 using a previously reported procedure [9, 12].


## 2.2. Porous TiO2 Electrodes

To prepare the working electrodes, the fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass that was used as the current collector (Nippon Sheet Glass, Solar, 4 mm thickness) was first cleaned in a detergent solution using an ultrasonic bath for 15 minutes and then rinsed with water and ethanol.  After treatment in an UV-O3 system for 18 minutes, the FTO glass plates were immersed in a 40 mM aqueous solution of TiCl4 at 70°C for 30 minutes and washed with water and ethanol.A layer of nanocrystalline-TiO2 paste was coated onto the FTO glass plates by screen printing and kept in a clean box for 3 minutes so that the paste could settle to reduce the irregularity of the surface and then dried for 6 minutes at 125°C.  This screen-printing procedure with the paste (coating, storing and drying) was repeated to obtain a working electrode of appropriate thickness [9].  By adjusting the thickness of the TiO2 pastes, the TiO2 electrodes were designed as shown in Figure 1. The porous TiO2 layers of 20 nm [9], 42 nm [11] and 400 nm [9] were transparent, semitransparent and scattering, respectively.  For the scattering layer, two coatings of macrocrystalline-TiO2 paste were deposited by screen printing, resulting in a light-scattering TiO2 layer of 4–5 μm thickness containing 400 nm-sized anatase particles.  The electrodes coated with the TiO2 pastes were gradually heated under an air flow at 325°C for 5 minutes, at 375°C for 5 minutes, at 450°C for 15 minutes and 500°C for 15 minutes.The sintered TiO2 film was treated with 40 mM TiCl4solution as described above, rinsed with water and ethanol and sintered again at 500°C for 30 minutes.  After cooling to 80°C, the TiO2 electrode was immersed in a 0.5 mM dye solution in a mixture of acetonitrile and tert-butyl alcohol (v/v: 1:1) and kept at room temperature for 20–24 hours (Ru dyes) or 4 hours (D149 with 1.0 mM chenodeoxy cholic acid) to complete the sensitizer uptake.


## 2.3. Pt Counter Electrodes

To prepare the counter electrode, a hole was drilled in the FTO glass (LOF Industries, TEC 15Ω/□, 2.2 mm thickness) by sand blasting. The perforated glass sheet was washed with H2O as well as with a 0.1 M HCl solution in ethanol and cleaned by ultrasound in an acetone bath for 10 minutes.  After removing residual organic contaminants by heating in air for 15 minutes at 400°C, the Pt catalyst was deposited on the FTO glass by coating with a drop of H2PtCl6 solution (3 mg Pt in 1 mL ethanol) and repeating the heat treatment at 400°C for 15 minutes.


## 2.4. DSC Assembly

The dye-covered TiO2 electrode and Pt counter electrode were assembled into a sandwich-type cell and sealed with a hot-melt gasket of 25 μm thickness made of the ionomer Surlyn1702 or liner low density polyethylene Bynel4164 (DuPont) on a heating stage.  A drop of the electrolyte was put on the hole in the back of the counter electrode.  The acetonitrile (AcCN) based electrolyte for N719 was 0.60 M BMII, 0.03 M I2, 0.10 M guanidinium thiocyanate and 0.50 M 4-tert-butylpyridine in a mixture of acetonitrile and valeronitrile (v/v: 85:15) [8–10].  The ionic-liquid (IL) electrolyte for Z907 and K19 was 0.2 M I2, 0.5 M NMBI and 0.1 M GuNCS in a mixture of PMII/EMINCS (v/v: 13:7) [14].  The AcCN-based electrolyte for D149 was 0.10 M lithium iodide, 0.60 M butylmethylimidazolium iodide, 0.05 M I2 and 0.05 M 4-tert-butylpyridine in AcCN:valeronitrile (v/v: 85:15)) [16].  The IL electrolyte for D149 was 0.20 M I2 in 1-methyl-3-propylimidazolium iodide, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis((trifluoromethyl) sulfonyl) imide and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium triflate (v/v/v: 2:1:1) [16].The cell was placed in a small vacuum chamber for a few seconds to remove the inside air.  Exposing it again to ambient pressure caused the electrolyte to be driven into the cell.  Finally, the hole was sealed using a hot-melt liner low density polyethylene film (Bynel 4164, 35μm thickness, Du-Pont) and a cover glass (0.1 mm thickness). In order to have good electrical contact between the connections and the photovoltaic measurement equipment, the edge of the FTO outside of the cell was scraped slightly with sandpaper or a file.  A solder (Cerasolza, Asahi Glass) was applied on each side of the FTO electrodes.


## 2.5. Measurements

Photovoltaic measurements employed an AM 1.5 solar simulator (100 mWcm-2).  Masks made of black plastic tape were attached on the Arctop filter to reduce the scattering of light [17]. The intensity of the simulated light was calibrated by using a reference Si photodiode equipped with an IR cutoff filter (KG-3, Schott) in order to reduce the mismatch in the region of 350–750 nm between the simulated light and AM 1.5 to less than 2% [18].  I-V curves were obtained by applying an external bias voltage to the cell and measuring the generated photocurrent with a digital source meter (Keithley 2400, Keithley Instruments).


## 3. Results and Discussions

### 3.1. SEM Observation of Nanocrystalline-TiO2 Porous Electrodes

Figure2(a) shows the SEM images of submicron TiO2 particles that were used in the light-scattering layer (Figure 1(b)). The particles were a pyramid-like angular shape. The light-scattering TiO2 layer was a mixture of nano-sized and submicron TiO2 particles [9].  In the SEM observations, the angular shape of the submicron TiO2 particles could not be seen in the light-scattering layer (Figure 2(b)).  The submicron TiO2 particles were surrounded by nanoparticles.  The outline of the angular shape can be seen through the surrounding nanoparticles.SEM images of the surface of TiO2 submicron particles  (400C, JGC-CCIC) (a) and a mixture of TiO2 submicronparticles and nanoparticles (PST-400C, JGC-CCIC) (b).  Magnification of each view is 50,000 times.
(a)(b)Figure3 shows cross-sectional SEM images of a porous TiO2 electrode that was prepared by breaking the substrate with a glass cutter.  It is noticeable that the electrode has a double-layered structure, as illustrated in Figure 1(b).  The magnified view of the light-scattering layer (Figure 3(b)) is similar to Figure 2(b); the submicron particles were coated by nanoparticles in the cross-sectional view of a sample prepared by mechanically breaking the substrate.Cross-sectional views of a double-layer electrode prepared by mechanically breaking the substrate.  The white dotted quadrangle in Figure3(a) indicates the zoomed-in area shown in Figure 3(b).
(a)(b)Figure4 shows the cross-sectional images of a nanocrystalline-TiO2 porous electrode prepared by polishing with an Ar-ion beam (the preparation and observation of the samples were done by KOBELCO Research Institute, Inc., Japan).  The observed nanocrystalline-TiO2 porous electrode has a double-layered structure on a glass substrate similar to Figure 1(b).  The nanocrystalline-TiO2 layer is smooth and flat, while the submicroncrystalline-TiO2 layer is rough due to the large particle size (Figure 4(a)).  The nanocrystalline-TiO2 layer appears very homogeneous at 5 000-times magnification (Figure 4(b)).  At 50 000 times magnification (Figure 4(c)), small cracks can be seen in the layer due to shrinkage caused by the heating procedure.  At 200 000 times magnification, the nanoparticles can be observed (Figure 4(d)), but the image is not clear because no metal was deposited by spattering in order to observe them.  Figure 4(e) shows the cross-section of the light-scattering layer by submicroncrystalline-TiO2 particles.  The material of this layer is a mixture of 90% of submicroncrystalline-TiO2 particles and 10% of nanocrystalline-TiO2 particles [9].  We can see the exact cross-sectional view of the submicroncrystalline-TiO2 particles (Figure 4(f)).  The size of the cross-sectioned submicron crystals is between 100 nm and 500 nm.  This size distribution is due to the Ar-ion beam etching, which cut the crystal at the center and/or the edge.  It is surprising that the structure of the submicroncrystalline-TiO2 particles is rather complicated (angular and horned) in the cross-sectional view, which cannot be observed in the SEM images of Figure 2(a).Cross-sectional SEM images of a porous double-layered TiO2 electrode polished with an Ar-ion beam (nanocrystalline-TiO2 layer: 14 μm thick; submicron crystalline-TiO2 layer: 5 μm thick).  (a) is the most zoomed-out image.  White dotted quadrangles show the zoomed-in area for the other images.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


### 3.2. I-V Curves with Variation of TiO2 Thickness

Figure5 shows the I-V curves of the DSCs with double-layer TiO2(d=20 nm and 400 nm) electrodes (Figure 1(b)).  The thickness of the nanocrystalline-TiO2 layer was adjusted between 2.8 μm to 17.4 μm.  The sensitizing dye was a Ru dye (N719), and the electrolyte was an AcCN-based electrolyte.  It was observed that the thicker layer gave higher photocurrent and lower photovoltage.  On the other hand, the thinner layer gave lower photocurrent and higher photovoltage.  This is a typical phenomenon in DSCs regardless of the kind of particles and dyes.  In the next sections, we discuss the photovoltaic characteristics for two sizes of TiO2 nanoparticles (d=42 nm and 20 nm).Figure 5
Photo I-V curves in relation to the thickness of double-layer nanocrystalline-TiO2electrodes (as shown in Figure 1(b)) with Ru dye (N719) and AcCN-based electrolyte.


### 3.3. Single-Layer Electrodes

Figure6 shows the photovoltaic characteristics of single-layer electrodes with a semitransparent layer of 42 nm TiO2 particles (Figure 1(a)).  The combinations of sensitizing dyes and electrolytes were 〈Ru dye (N719)/AnCN-based electrolyte〉  and 〈Ru dye (Z907)/IL electrolyte〉.Photovoltaic characteristics related to the thickness of nanocrystalline-TiO2(d=42 nm) layers of single-layer electrodes (as shown in Figure 1(a)): N719-sensitized solar cells using AcCN-based electrolytes (solid circles); Z907-sensitized solar cells using IL electrolytes (open circles).
(a)(b)(c)(d)For both combinations of dye and electrolyte, the open-circuit photovoltage (Voc) decreased linearly with increasing thickness of the nanocrystalline-TiO2 electrode (Figure 6(a)).However, the behavior of the short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) (Figure 6(b)) was different for the electrolytes. For the AcCN-based electrolyte, the Jsc increased and became saturated with increasing thickness. On the other hand, theJsc for the IL electrolyte reached a maximum around 14 μm.  At the thin TiO2 electrode (4 μm thickness), the values of Jsc for the AcCN-based (11.8 mA cm-2) and IL (10.5 mA cm-2) electrolytes were similar; the difference was only 12% (1.3 mA cm-2).  Upon increasing the thickness, the difference increased to 42% for the 21 μm thick films.  This arises from the high viscosity and slow I-/I3- diffusion in the IL electrolyte [16].  The redox couple (I-/I3-) can diffuse readily across the thin nanocrystalline-TiO2 layer and sustain the low photocurrent.  However, transport is impaired in thicker nanocrystalline electrode films where larger photocurrents must be sustained.  By contrast, the viscosity of AcCN is so low that high photocurrent can be supported even for thick nanocrystalline-TiO2 layers.The fill factor (FF) was not affected by variations in the thickness of the nanocrystalline-TiO2 layer (Figure 6(c)).Consequently, the conversion efficiency reached a maximum (Figure6(d)).  Nevertheless, the viscosity and the diffusion coefficient of I-/I3-  differed by a factor of 100 [16], the AcCN-based and IL electrolytes gave peaks in the same position for the 14–16 μm thickness.


### 3.4. Double-Layer Electrodes

Figure7 shows the photovoltaic characteristics of the double-layer electrodes (Figure 1(b)).  The particle sizes for the transparent and light-scattering layers were 20 nm and 400 nm, respectively.  In this paper, the thickness of the transparent layer (d=20 nm; “X” in Figure 1(b)) was varied.  Four combinations of sensitizing dyes and electrolytes were used: 〈Ru dye (N719)/AnCN-based electrolyte〉, 〈Ru dye (K19)/IL electrolyte〉, 〈organic dye (D149)/AnCN-based electrolyte〉 and 〈organic dye (D149)/IL electrolyte〉.Photovoltaic characteristics in relation to the thickness of nanocrystalline-TiO2(d=20 nm) layers in double-layer electrodes (as shown in Figure 1(b)): N719-sensitized solar cells using AcCN-based electrolytes (solid circles); K19-sensitized solar cells using ionic-liquid-based electrolytes (open circles); D149-sensitized solar cells using AcCN-based (solid square) and ionic-liquid-based (open square) electrolytes.
(a)(b)(c)(d)In all cases,Voc decreased linearly with increasing the thickness of the nanocrystalline-TiO2 electrode (Figure 7(a)). This phenomenon was the same as that of the single-layer system (Figure 6(a)).  It was remarkable that the highest Voc was over 900 mV for the nanocrystalline-TiO2 electrode (3 μm) using Ru dye (N719) and AcCN-based electrolyte.Figure7(b) shows the differences in the behavior of Jsc in relation to the nanocrystalline-TiO2 (d=20 nm) thickness (Figure 1(b)) between AcCN-based and IL electrolytes, which is similar to the phenomenon observed for the single-layer electrode (d=42 nm, Figure 6(b)).  Using the AcCN-based electrolyte, the Jsc increased and became saturated with increasing thickness.  On the other hand, using the IL electrolyte, the Jsc had a peak at a thickness of around 6 μm.  The optimal thickness for the 20 nm particles (Figure 7(b)) was half that obtained for the 42 nm particles (Figure 6(b)).  The larger particles (d=42 nm, Figure 6(b)) produced larger pores into which the redox couple (I-/I3-) could diffuse more effectively than into the smaller pores created by the smaller particles (d=20 nm).  Therefore, the larger particles gave a Jsc peak at a larger thickness than the smaller particles.The FF was not greatly affected by variations in the thickness of the nanocrystalline-TiO2 layer (Figure 7(c)).  In the case of the organic dye (D149) with IL electrolyte, however, the FF decreased as a result of the high photocurrent and the low diffusion coefficient of the redox couple.Consequently, the conversion efficiency reached a maximum (Figure7(d)).  The AcCN-based and IL electrolytes gave peaks at 14 μm and 6 μm thickness, respectively.  The important point is that the position of the peaks was unrelated to the nature of the Ru dye and the organic dye, in spite of the 4-fold difference between their absorption coefficients (N719: 13,900 M-1 cm-1, K19: 18200 M-1 cm-1, D149: 68,700 M-1 cm-1).  At first, we expected that the organic dye would yield the highest efficiency when the thickness of the nanocrystalline-TiO2 layer was small; however, the peak of efficiency was determined by the electrolyte and the particle size, not by the type of sensitizer.


## 3.1. SEM Observation of Nanocrystalline-TiO2 Porous Electrodes

Figure2(a) shows the SEM images of submicron TiO2 particles that were used in the light-scattering layer (Figure 1(b)). The particles were a pyramid-like angular shape. The light-scattering TiO2 layer was a mixture of nano-sized and submicron TiO2 particles [9].  In the SEM observations, the angular shape of the submicron TiO2 particles could not be seen in the light-scattering layer (Figure 2(b)).  The submicron TiO2 particles were surrounded by nanoparticles.  The outline of the angular shape can be seen through the surrounding nanoparticles.SEM images of the surface of TiO2 submicron particles  (400C, JGC-CCIC) (a) and a mixture of TiO2 submicronparticles and nanoparticles (PST-400C, JGC-CCIC) (b).  Magnification of each view is 50,000 times.
(a)(b)Figure3 shows cross-sectional SEM images of a porous TiO2 electrode that was prepared by breaking the substrate with a glass cutter.  It is noticeable that the electrode has a double-layered structure, as illustrated in Figure 1(b).  The magnified view of the light-scattering layer (Figure 3(b)) is similar to Figure 2(b); the submicron particles were coated by nanoparticles in the cross-sectional view of a sample prepared by mechanically breaking the substrate.Cross-sectional views of a double-layer electrode prepared by mechanically breaking the substrate.  The white dotted quadrangle in Figure3(a) indicates the zoomed-in area shown in Figure 3(b).
(a)(b)Figure4 shows the cross-sectional images of a nanocrystalline-TiO2 porous electrode prepared by polishing with an Ar-ion beam (the preparation and observation of the samples were done by KOBELCO Research Institute, Inc., Japan).  The observed nanocrystalline-TiO2 porous electrode has a double-layered structure on a glass substrate similar to Figure 1(b).  The nanocrystalline-TiO2 layer is smooth and flat, while the submicroncrystalline-TiO2 layer is rough due to the large particle size (Figure 4(a)).  The nanocrystalline-TiO2 layer appears very homogeneous at 5 000-times magnification (Figure 4(b)).  At 50 000 times magnification (Figure 4(c)), small cracks can be seen in the layer due to shrinkage caused by the heating procedure.  At 200 000 times magnification, the nanoparticles can be observed (Figure 4(d)), but the image is not clear because no metal was deposited by spattering in order to observe them.  Figure 4(e) shows the cross-section of the light-scattering layer by submicroncrystalline-TiO2 particles.  The material of this layer is a mixture of 90% of submicroncrystalline-TiO2 particles and 10% of nanocrystalline-TiO2 particles [9].  We can see the exact cross-sectional view of the submicroncrystalline-TiO2 particles (Figure 4(f)).  The size of the cross-sectioned submicron crystals is between 100 nm and 500 nm.  This size distribution is due to the Ar-ion beam etching, which cut the crystal at the center and/or the edge.  It is surprising that the structure of the submicroncrystalline-TiO2 particles is rather complicated (angular and horned) in the cross-sectional view, which cannot be observed in the SEM images of Figure 2(a).Cross-sectional SEM images of a porous double-layered TiO2 electrode polished with an Ar-ion beam (nanocrystalline-TiO2 layer: 14 μm thick; submicron crystalline-TiO2 layer: 5 μm thick).  (a) is the most zoomed-out image.  White dotted quadrangles show the zoomed-in area for the other images.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


## 3.2. I-V Curves with Variation of TiO2 Thickness

Figure5 shows the I-V curves of the DSCs with double-layer TiO2(d=20 nm and 400 nm) electrodes (Figure 1(b)).  The thickness of the nanocrystalline-TiO2 layer was adjusted between 2.8 μm to 17.4 μm.  The sensitizing dye was a Ru dye (N719), and the electrolyte was an AcCN-based electrolyte.  It was observed that the thicker layer gave higher photocurrent and lower photovoltage.  On the other hand, the thinner layer gave lower photocurrent and higher photovoltage.  This is a typical phenomenon in DSCs regardless of the kind of particles and dyes.  In the next sections, we discuss the photovoltaic characteristics for two sizes of TiO2 nanoparticles (d=42 nm and 20 nm).Figure 5
Photo I-V curves in relation to the thickness of double-layer nanocrystalline-TiO2electrodes (as shown in Figure 1(b)) with Ru dye (N719) and AcCN-based electrolyte.


## 3.3. Single-Layer Electrodes

Figure6 shows the photovoltaic characteristics of single-layer electrodes with a semitransparent layer of 42 nm TiO2 particles (Figure 1(a)).  The combinations of sensitizing dyes and electrolytes were 〈Ru dye (N719)/AnCN-based electrolyte〉  and 〈Ru dye (Z907)/IL electrolyte〉.Photovoltaic characteristics related to the thickness of nanocrystalline-TiO2(d=42 nm) layers of single-layer electrodes (as shown in Figure 1(a)): N719-sensitized solar cells using AcCN-based electrolytes (solid circles); Z907-sensitized solar cells using IL electrolytes (open circles).
(a)(b)(c)(d)For both combinations of dye and electrolyte, the open-circuit photovoltage (Voc) decreased linearly with increasing thickness of the nanocrystalline-TiO2 electrode (Figure 6(a)).However, the behavior of the short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) (Figure 6(b)) was different for the electrolytes. For the AcCN-based electrolyte, the Jsc increased and became saturated with increasing thickness. On the other hand, theJsc for the IL electrolyte reached a maximum around 14 μm.  At the thin TiO2 electrode (4 μm thickness), the values of Jsc for the AcCN-based (11.8 mA cm-2) and IL (10.5 mA cm-2) electrolytes were similar; the difference was only 12% (1.3 mA cm-2).  Upon increasing the thickness, the difference increased to 42% for the 21 μm thick films.  This arises from the high viscosity and slow I-/I3- diffusion in the IL electrolyte [16].  The redox couple (I-/I3-) can diffuse readily across the thin nanocrystalline-TiO2 layer and sustain the low photocurrent.  However, transport is impaired in thicker nanocrystalline electrode films where larger photocurrents must be sustained.  By contrast, the viscosity of AcCN is so low that high photocurrent can be supported even for thick nanocrystalline-TiO2 layers.The fill factor (FF) was not affected by variations in the thickness of the nanocrystalline-TiO2 layer (Figure 6(c)).Consequently, the conversion efficiency reached a maximum (Figure6(d)).  Nevertheless, the viscosity and the diffusion coefficient of I-/I3-  differed by a factor of 100 [16], the AcCN-based and IL electrolytes gave peaks in the same position for the 14–16 μm thickness.


## 3.4. Double-Layer Electrodes

Figure7 shows the photovoltaic characteristics of the double-layer electrodes (Figure 1(b)).  The particle sizes for the transparent and light-scattering layers were 20 nm and 400 nm, respectively.  In this paper, the thickness of the transparent layer (d=20 nm; “X” in Figure 1(b)) was varied.  Four combinations of sensitizing dyes and electrolytes were used: 〈Ru dye (N719)/AnCN-based electrolyte〉, 〈Ru dye (K19)/IL electrolyte〉, 〈organic dye (D149)/AnCN-based electrolyte〉 and 〈organic dye (D149)/IL electrolyte〉.Photovoltaic characteristics in relation to the thickness of nanocrystalline-TiO2(d=20 nm) layers in double-layer electrodes (as shown in Figure 1(b)): N719-sensitized solar cells using AcCN-based electrolytes (solid circles); K19-sensitized solar cells using ionic-liquid-based electrolytes (open circles); D149-sensitized solar cells using AcCN-based (solid square) and ionic-liquid-based (open square) electrolytes.
(a)(b)(c)(d)In all cases,Voc decreased linearly with increasing the thickness of the nanocrystalline-TiO2 electrode (Figure 7(a)). This phenomenon was the same as that of the single-layer system (Figure 6(a)).  It was remarkable that the highest Voc was over 900 mV for the nanocrystalline-TiO2 electrode (3 μm) using Ru dye (N719) and AcCN-based electrolyte.Figure7(b) shows the differences in the behavior of Jsc in relation to the nanocrystalline-TiO2 (d=20 nm) thickness (Figure 1(b)) between AcCN-based and IL electrolytes, which is similar to the phenomenon observed for the single-layer electrode (d=42 nm, Figure 6(b)).  Using the AcCN-based electrolyte, the Jsc increased and became saturated with increasing thickness.  On the other hand, using the IL electrolyte, the Jsc had a peak at a thickness of around 6 μm.  The optimal thickness for the 20 nm particles (Figure 7(b)) was half that obtained for the 42 nm particles (Figure 6(b)).  The larger particles (d=42 nm, Figure 6(b)) produced larger pores into which the redox couple (I-/I3-) could diffuse more effectively than into the smaller pores created by the smaller particles (d=20 nm).  Therefore, the larger particles gave a Jsc peak at a larger thickness than the smaller particles.The FF was not greatly affected by variations in the thickness of the nanocrystalline-TiO2 layer (Figure 7(c)).  In the case of the organic dye (D149) with IL electrolyte, however, the FF decreased as a result of the high photocurrent and the low diffusion coefficient of the redox couple.Consequently, the conversion efficiency reached a maximum (Figure7(d)).  The AcCN-based and IL electrolytes gave peaks at 14 μm and 6 μm thickness, respectively.  The important point is that the position of the peaks was unrelated to the nature of the Ru dye and the organic dye, in spite of the 4-fold difference between their absorption coefficients (N719: 13,900 M-1 cm-1, K19: 18200 M-1 cm-1, D149: 68,700 M-1 cm-1).  At first, we expected that the organic dye would yield the highest efficiency when the thickness of the nanocrystalline-TiO2 layer was small; however, the peak of efficiency was determined by the electrolyte and the particle size, not by the type of sensitizer.


## 4. Conclusions

The structure of the cross-section of the double-layered TiO2 electrode, which was prepared by Ar-ion beam etching, has been observed by SEM for the first time.  We confirmed the difference between the cross-sectional structures prepared by mechanically breaking the substrate and Ar-ion beam etching and observed the unique structure of the 400 nm TiO2 particles with respect to the light-scattering effect.In order to optimize the design of DSCs for maximal conversion efficiency, the TiO2 particle size and the thickness of the nanocrystalline-TiO2 layer were varied and tested with several sensitizing dyes and electrolytes.  For the single-layer electrodes (semitransparent, d=42 nm), the maximal efficiencies were 6.6% at 14 μm and 9.9% at 16 μm with 〈Z907/IL〉 and 〈N719/AcCN〉, respectively. For the double-layer electrodes (transparent layer: d=20 nm; light-scattering layer: d=400 nm), the maximal efficiencies were 7.0% at 6 μm, 6.3% at 6 μm, 10.2% at 14 μm and 9.0% at 14 μm with 〈K19/IL〉, 〈D149/IL〉, 〈N719/AcCN〉 and 〈D149/AcCN〉, respectively.  The optimal thickness of the nanocrystalline-TiO2 layer depends on the electrolyte and TiO2 particle size but not on the absorption coefficient of the dye.From these experimental results, we can estimate the conversion efficiency of a DSC for an ideal case whereVoc, Jsc and FF attain their maximal values.  The best values were a Voc of 900 mV (Figure 7(a)), a Jsc of 20 mA cm-2  (Figure 7(b)) and an FF of 0.77 (Figure 7(c)).  Using these values, the ideal conversion efficiency reaches 13.9%.  In order to obtain this value, we need to use a dye with a high absorption coefficient that displays a strong blocking effect against charge recombination.  We hope that this report is helpful for the development of DSCs for practical applications.



---

*Source: 517609-2009-08-18.xml*