# Long-Term Follow-Up of Dogs and Cats after Stabilization of Thoracolumbar Instability Using 2-0 UniLock Implants

Authors: Julien Letesson; Bastien Goin; Jean Louis Trouillet; Paul Barthez
Journal: Veterinary Medicine International
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

Traumatic vertebral fracture or luxation often results in spinal instability requiring surgical stabilization. This study describes the long-term outcome of spinal stabilization using a unilateral 5-hole 2-0 UniLock implant in eight dogs and two cats with trauma-induced thoracolumbar vertebral luxation/subluxation and presumed instability, as assessed by a combination of preoperative radiographs and MRI using a 3-compartment method. The UniLock plate was secured with four monocortical locking screws in adjacent vertebral bodies. Additional pins and facet screws were used in several patients. Postoperative radiographs and MRI studies showed restoration of the main spinal axis in all patients and satisfactory implantation of the screws in the vertebral bodies, with no intrusion in the vertebral canal or in the adjacent intervertebral disc spaces. Neurological status improved in nine patients six weeks postoperatively. Partial implant failure was detected in three patients with no long-term consequences. After 12 months, seven patients reached full recovery with no neurological deficit, two patients were euthanized (including one owing to an unrelated condition), and one remained paraparetic. The results of this study demonstrate that using a 2-0 UniLock implant to stabilize the thoracolumbar spine results in satisfactory long-term recovery in most dogs and cats with traumatic spinal luxation/subluxation and presumed instability. Complications may occur but do not require revision surgery and do not affect clinical outcomes.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Traumatic vertebral fracture or luxation often results in spinal instability requiring surgical stabilization [1–3]. In dogs and cats, these injuries are most commonly due to road traffic accidents (RTA) in 2/3 of the cases [4]. The T3-L3 spinal segment has been documented to be the most frequently affected in both dogs and cats, representing 48 to 58% of the injuries, followed by the lumbosacral (caudal to L3) segment and the cervical region [4, 5]. Dogs are more predisposed to subluxation (20% of cases) than cats (6%), which are more prone to fractures [5]. The decision to surgically stabilize the spine is based on clinical and neurological examinations and assessment of vertebral instability using diagnostic imaging. Although stress views are contraindicated in these patients, vertebral instability may be predicted on static images using the previously described 3-compartment method [6–8]. This method divides the vertebral unit into three parts: dorsal, intermediate, and ventral. Failure of at least two compartments is considered as an indication of vertebral instability. Although CT is currently considered as the gold standard for the evaluation of spinal osseous structures [6–8], MRI allows for accurate evaluation of the spinal cord, intervertebral disc (IVD), and surrounding soft tissue structures [7–16]. Radiographs have been shown to be less accurate than CT for the evaluation of patients with spinal trauma [6].Historically, several methods of surgical spinal stabilization have been proposed [2, 3, 9, 17, 18], including the fluoroscopy-guided placement of external fixation [19, 20], the use of a tension band or lubra plates on the dorsal compartment [21–23], and the use of pins or screws inserted dorsally in the vertebral body and secured with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) [2, 9, 17, 24]. A recent study also reported the use of pedicle screws and PMMA to stabilize L6 vertebral body fractures [25]. Although PMMA is widely used to provide rigid and adaptable stabilization, it may be cumbersome [2, 3], make wound closure more difficult [2, 3, 9, 17], and introduce a large amount of foreign material in the paravertebral musculature. The exothermic reaction generated during polymerization may also cause damage to the surrounding tissues [1–3].Safe corridors for pin or screw implantation in the thoracolumbar spine have been described in dogs [26] and cats [27] based on CT images, establishing safe insertion points and the optimal axis to maximize bone purchase [28, 29].Although dorsal implantation has been shown to be feasible and safe in the lumbar region, it is impractical in the canine thoracic spine owing to vertebral conformation and the ribs.A ventral approach after thoracotomy has been proposed for the thoracic spine [26, 30–33]. In the lumbar region, a lateral approach has been suggested to optimize bone purchase [29]. A biomechanical argument also encouraged such an approach: in an ex vivo L3-L4 model, a bilateral PMMA pin unit placed dorsally to the spine did not show any biomechanical superiority compared to a unilateral PMMA pin unit placed laterally to the vertebral body [34].The use of plates anchored in the vertebral body has been considered recently with the advance of locking osteosynthesis implants [2, 3, 28, 35–38]. A nonlocking plate needs perfect contouring to achieve stability, generating friction at the bone-plate interface and high torque on the screws [3]. Plate contouring is not easy to achieve for the spine owing to the complex conformation of the bones. Locking plates may provide satisfactory anchoring with monocortical screws [2, 3, 36] without the need of being perfectly contoured [3]. They can be placed on a nontension surface of the bone [3, 30]. Locking plates have a low profile and provide closer to normal spinal rigidity than PMMA [3, 35, 36]. This is particularly important in areas where major flexion forces are present, that is, the thoracolumbar junction. Relative stability provided by a semirigid construct has been recommended to limit the risks of screw pullout and failure for ventral plating of the thoracolumbar junction [30].The design and titanium composition of the 2-0 UniLock locking implants is appropriate for spinal stabilization and has the advantage of being more compatible with MR imaging [39]. They have lower stiffness than a standard stainless steel 316L implant [3, 40]. Moreover, titanium implants have shown advantageous yield stress compared to stainless steel on an ex vivo bovine spine model [41]. These implants were originally designed for maxillofacial surgery in humans [42]. They have already been used successfully in the management of cervical fracture-luxation and caudal cervical myelopathy in 2 mm and 2.4 mm diameters [28, 37, 38]. To our knowledge, the use of this implant to treat thoracolumbar instability in dogs and cats has not been reported.The purpose of this study was to assess the short- and long-term outcomes of spinal stabilization using 2-0 UniLock implants in dogs and cats with trauma-induced vertebral instability, as assessed by a combination of radiographs and MRI.


## 2. Materials and Methods

Medical records of the Lameilhé Veterinary Clinic were examined. We selected patients who presented for thoracolumbar spinal trauma and were surgically treated with 2-0 UniLock implants between 2015 and 2020.Inclusion criteria included radiographs and a preoperative MRI study showing vertebral subluxation and suspected instability based on the 3-compartment method, stabilization using 2-0 UniLock implants, and a minimal 12-month follow-up period. Patients with a corner endplate, spinous, and articular process fractures were included; patients with complete vertebral body fractures were excluded.Species, breed, age, gender, and weight at the time of admission were collected from the medical records. The cause of trauma was recorded. All patients were secured on a radiolucent backboard and sedated with 0.2 mg/kg morphine (morphine chlorhydrate, Aguettant, France) before any additional procedure could be performed. Complete physical, neurological, and orthopedic examinations were performed in all patients. Neurological status was graded from 0 (paraplegia with no deep nociception) to 5 (spinal hyperesthesia only) using the previously published modified Frankel spinal cord injury scale [43]. Patients with associated traumatic lesions requiring immediate attention were treated as needed.All patients had orthogonal (lateral and ventrodorsal) radiographs (flat panel detector, Ibis, Bergamo, Italy) of the thoracolumbar spine at the time of presentation. They were manipulated with caution to avoid further spinal damage. Radiographs were evaluated for signs of deviation of the main spinal axis, relative displacement of vertebrae, change in size of the vertebral canal, change in width of IVD spaces, and vertebral fractures.All patients had an MRI study (VetMR, 0.18T, Esaote) upon presentation. MRI studies were performed within 48 hours of the injury in eight patients, within 72 hours in one patient, and within 15 days in another. All acquisitions were performed with patients in right lateral recumbency with a neutral position. The typical MRI acquisition protocol included sagittal and transverse spin-echo T1- and T2-weighted images followed by postcontrast sagittal and transverse spin-echo T1-weighted and dorsal GRE T1-weighted images taken after intravenous injection of 0.1 mmol/kg of gadoteric acid meglumine salt (Clariscan, GE, USA). In two patients, gadolinium was not used.For each MRI study, the affected IVD space was recorded and assessed for size (collapsed, enlarged, and normal) and changes in T2-signal intensity. The dorsal and ventral aspects of the annulus fibrosus were assessed for signs of discontinuity. Fractures of adjacent vertebrae were also recorded. The vertebral canal was assessed for change in size, deviation of the main vertebral axis, presence of extradural material, and obliteration of the peridural fat. The spinal cord was assessed for changes in T2-signal intensity, diameter, and degree of deformation. Spinal cord deformation was defined as mild when the reduction of diameter was lower than 5%, moderate when it was between 5 and 20%, and severe for reductions exceeding 20%. Finally, epaxial muscles were evaluated for changes in T2-signal intensity and enhancement after gadolinium injection. The extent and side of the epaxial muscular changes were also recorded. Vertebral instability was assessed by combining results of radiographic and MRI studies, using the previously described 3-compartment method (Figure1) [7]. The number of failing compartments was recorded for each patient.Figure 1
Sagittal T1-weighted MR image of the thoracic spine of one dog showing rupture of all three compartments, suggesting vertebral instability.Patients were prepared for surgery and anesthetized using the following protocol: premedication and analgesia were performed with 0.1 mg/kg/SC of morphine (morphine chlorhydrate, Aguettant, France) and 0.1 mg/kg IV of meloxicam (Metacam, Bohringer, France). Antibiotic prophylaxis consisted of 30 mg/kg/IV of cefazolin every two hours (Cefazolin, Panpharma, France). Induction was performed with 0.5 mg/kg/IV of diazepam (Valium, Roche, France) combined with 2 mg/kg/IV of alfaxalone (Alfaxan, Dechra, France). After intubation, anesthesia was maintained with oxygen and isoflurane (Isoflurin, Axience, France).Two versions of the UniLock 2-0 osteosynthesis plate (DepuySynthes, Switzerland) were used depending on the size of the vertebral bodies (Figure2): 1.5 mm thick plates with an 8 mm interhole distance were used in seven patients, and 1.3 mm thick plates with a 6.5 mm interhole distance were used in three patients. The choice of the plate was made based on measurements of the vertebral body length on preoperative radiographs and sagittal MR images so that two locking screws could be placed in each adjacent vertebral body (four in total) with the central vacant hole located at the level of the affected IVD space. Plates were slightly contoured in seven patients to improve bone contact and decrease the risk of screw pullout. In one dog, one of the locking screws could not be placed satisfactorily and was replaced by a standard nonlocking screw (1/40 screw), as optimal placement of the locking screw could not be obtained owing to the locking guide’s fixed angle.Figure 2
Two different 2-0 UniLock osteosynthesis plates used in the study. (A) 1.5 mm thick plates with an 8 mm interhole distance. (B) 1.3 mm thick plates with a 6.5 mm interhole distance.Patients with thoracic vertebral subluxation (four patients, all dogs) were positioned in right lateral recumbency. A left thoracotomy was performed at the level of the intercostal space corresponding to the site of the vertebral instability. Pulmonary expansion was controlled using positive pressure ventilation (Datex Aestiva/5, Datex Ohmeda, France). A Finochietto retractor and wet compresses were used to maintain the opening. In one dog, partial removal of the dorsal part of the 12th left rib was performed to widen the surgical field. The spine was approached ventrally to expose the vertebral bodies. Subluxation was reduced by manual traction of the vertebral bodies, and in three dogs, the alignment was maintained using a pin inserted caudocranially into both vertebral bodies. The precontoured 5-hole 2-0 UniLock plate was placed on the ventrolateral aspect of the vertebral bodies. It extended cranially and caudally to the following IVD space. It was held in place by a small pin inserted in the central hole. After securing the locking guide to the plate, only the cis-cortex was drilled with a 1.5 mm drill bit (DepuySynthes, Switzerland) in a laterodorsal direction before implanting the four locking monocortical screws (Figure3).Figure 3
Surgical view after stabilization of Th11-Th12 IVD space of one dog with 2-0 UniLock osteosynthesis plate secured with four monocortical titanium locking screws and one pin via a thoracic approach. White arrow: complete loss of discal structure of Th11-Th12.A drill stop system (Figure4) (Veterinary Instrumentation, Sheffield, UK) was used to help maximize bone purchase and remain monocortical. The depth of drilling was predefined using preoperative MRI images. The locking guide was used to block the drill at the planned depth (Figure 4). In one dog, extradural cord compressive material was removed using a foraminotomy with an additional lateral approach. Finally, a chest tube was inserted, and the intercostal space was closed conventionally plane by plane, associated with the restoration of the pleural vacuum.Figure 4
Photograph of plate and drill stop system showing drill stop mounted on 1.5 mm drill bit (yellow arrow) and predefined depth of drilling (white arrow).Patients with lumbar vertebral subluxation (six patients: four dogs and two cats) were positioned in ventral recumbency. A lateral approach to the lumbar spine was performed in three dogs. In the other three patients (two cats and one dog), a dorsal approach to the lumbar spine was performed to insert facet screws. The latter were used to maintain the reduction and alignment of the vertebral bodies during the placement of the plate. A single facet screw (2 mm UniLock nonlocking screw, Depuy Synthes, Switzerland) was used in one dog on the ipsilateral side of the bone plate. For the two cats, two 1 mm stainless steel screws (VOI, USA) were used, and a minimal extension of the dorsal approach was needed on the opposite side of plating (Figure5). The subluxation was reduced by gentle manipulation of the vertebral bodies. The 2-0 UniLock osteosynthesis plate was then placed laterally between the articular and transverse processes of each vertebra. The screws were then implanted into the vertebral bodies. In dogs, the drilling entry point was at the level of the junction between the pedicle and the transverse process with a 60° angle between the sagittal plane and the direction of the drilling in a slightly ventral direction [26, 29]. In cats, the drilling entry point was at the base of the transverse process with an angle close to 90° to the sagittal plane (Figure 5) [27]. The depth of drilling was determined as described above, and a drill stop (Figure 4) was used to maximize the bone anchorage of the monocortical screws.Figure 5
Postoperative lateral (a) and ventrodorsal (b) radiographs of lumbar spine of a cat suffering from L4-L5 injury showing 2-0 UniLock osteosynthesis plate secured with four monocortical titanium locking screws placed on the left side of vertebral bodies of L4 and L5 and two additional 1 mm stainless steel facet screws.
(a)(b)Orthogonal (lateral and ventrodorsal) radiographs were performed immediately after surgery in all patients to evaluate the reduction of the spinal subluxation, the restoration of the spinal axis, and the accurate placement of the implants. The position of the screws was assessed particularly to determine if they were monocortical.A postoperative MRI study was performed in nine out of ten patients, using the same protocol as that of the preoperative study. MR images were evaluated for signs of paramagnetic artifacts produced by the implants, and, if present, their effect on the evaluation of the vertebral canal was assessed. The integrity of the vertebral canal and the size and shape of the spinal cord were evaluated for signs of persistent spinal cord compression.After surgery, patients received 0.1 mg/kg SID of meloxicam (Metacam, Bohringer, France) orally for 15 days. A complete physical and neurological examination was performed after complete recovery from anesthesia. All patients were cage-rested for three weeks. A standardized postoperative physiotherapy program was performed, including standing sessions three times a day, mechanotherapy of the pelvic limbs, and gentle walking associated with abdominal support when voluntary movements were present [44].A first follow-up evaluation was performed two to four weeks postoperatively in all patients. Additional follow-up evaluations were performed four to 28 weeks postoperatively in eight patients. They consisted in complete physical, neurological, and radiographic examinations. Long-term follow-up was performed 12 months postoperatively in eight surviving patients by telephone interview with the owner or referring veterinarian and a clinical exam or analysis of video clips of the patient’s locomotion sent by the owner.


## 3. Results

Eight dogs and two cats met the inclusion criteria. Dogs were (mean ± SD) 6 ± 4.5 years old and weighted (mean ± SD) 16 ± 6 kg. There were six females and two males. Breeds included Border Collie (n = 2), Eurasier (n = 1), English Setter (n = 1), Cocker Spaniel (n = 1), Ratter (n = 1), Yorkshire Terrier (n = 1), and Fawn Brittany Basset (n = 1). The two cats were European Short Hair cats aged 1 and 2.5 years and weighing 3 and 5 kg, respectively. There were one male and one female. The cause of trauma was RTA in six patients. Other causes included a cow kick (n = 1), getting trapped in a gate (n = 1), a high-rise fall (n = 1), and hunting trauma (n = 1) (Table 1).Table 1
Patient signalment, cause of trauma, and neurological status upon admission.
SpeciesBreedAge (years)GenderWeight (kg)Cause of traumaNeurolocalizationNeurological statusDogEurasier2M23RTAUMNGr1 evolving to Gr 0DogEnglish Setter3F18RTAUMNGr1DogCocker Spaniel8F17Trapped in gateUMNGr2DogYorkshire11F4RTAUMNGr2DogRatter14M15RTAUMNGr3bDogBorder Collie1.5F16High-rise fallUMNGr1DogFawn Brittany Basset7F12.5Hunting traumaUMNGr2DogBorder Collie3F20Cow kickUMNGr1CatEuropean Cat1F3RTAUMNGr3bCatEuropean Cat2.5M5RTALMNGr0RTA: road traffic accident; UMN: upper motor neuron; LMN: lower motor neuron.All patients had nonambulatory paralysis with signs of upper motor neuron (UMN) lesion in nine patients and signs of lower motoneuron (LMN) lesion in one cat with an L4-L5 lesion. Modified Frankel spinal cord injury grade was 3b in two patients (one dog and one cat), 2 in three patients, 1 in three patients, and 0 in two patients. One of the two patients with grade 0 was downgraded from 1 to 0 during the admission period (Table1).Crepitation on palpation of the spine was observed in all patients, suggesting vertebral fractures/subluxation, which were confirmed radiographically. All lesions were included in the T11-L5 segment, with three lesions at the T12-T13 level, three lesions at the L2-L3 level, and one lesion at T11-T12, L1-L2, L3-L4, and L4-L5 levels (Table2). Based on lateral radiographs, deviation of the main spinal axis was identified in nine patients, with ventral displacement of the caudal spinal segment in seven patients (seven dogs) and dorsal displacement in two patients (two cats). Upon examination of the ventrodorsal radiographs, lateral deviation of the main spinal axis was observed in four patients. Endplate corner fractures were identified in two patients. Bilateral zygapophyseal joint luxation was observed in two patients (1 cat and 1 dog) (Table 2).Table 2
Preoperative radiographic and MRI findings.
Radiographic findingsMRI findingsIntervertebral disc spaceVertebraeVertebral canalSpinal cordEpaxial musclesSpeciesIVD spaceAxial displ ML viewsLateral displ DV viewsCaudal segment displVertebral plateau fractureCollapsed/enlarged/normalT2 signal of the discRupture of the annulus fibrosusFracturesSubluxation/change in vertebral canal diameter or main vertebral axisExtradural material/obliteration peridural fatHypersignal T2CompressionHypersignal T2EnhancementSideExtent (nb vertebral bodies)Extent (cranial-caudal)DogTh12-Th13YesNoVentralNoCollapsedDecreasedDorsal and ventralSpinous process fracture of Th13Mild ventral displacement of main spinal axis caudal to Th13YesNoModerateYesYesBilateral, but more severe on the right side4Caudal (1 Cr + 3 Cd)DogT11-T12YesYesVentralNoCollapsedDecreasedDorsal and ventralRight cranial articular process of T12Slight ventral displacement of T12 relative to T11SlightYesModerateYesN/ABoth1CaudalDogL3-L4YesNoVentralNoSeverely enlargedIncreasedDorsal and ventralSpinous process deformation of L3Mild ventral displacement of main spinal axis caudal to L4NoNoNoNoNoN/AN/AN/ADogL2-L3YesYesVentralNoEnlargedNormalDorsal and ventralNoVentral displacement of main spinal axis caudal to L2-L3NoNoNoNoNoN/AN/AN/ADogTh12-Th13NoYesNoNoSlightly collapsedDecreasedDorsalNoNoSlightNoModerateYesYesLeft1.5CaudalDogL2-L3YesNoVentralYesCollapsedSeverely decreasedDorsalSpinous process fracture of L3Rightward deviation of main spinal axis caudal to L2-L3SlightYesMildYesYesBoth2CentralDogL1-L2YesNoVentralNoSeverely enlargedIncreasedVentral and dorsalNoVentral displacement of main spinal axis caudal to L2NoNo (T2 quality)ModerateNoYesBoth1CaudalDogTh12-Th13YesNoVentralNoSlightly enlargedNormalVentral and dorsalLeft cranial articular process of T13 fractureMild ventral displacement of main spinal axis caudal to Th13YesYesSevereYesYesBoth1CaudalCatL4-L5YesNoDorsalNoSlightly decreasedSeverely decreasedDorsalNoNoNoYesNoYesYesBoth1.5CaudalCatL2-L3YesYesDorsalYesCollapsedDecreasedDorsalNoNoNoNoMildNoN/AN/AN/AN/ADispl: displacement; ML: mediolateral, DV: dorsoventral, Nb: number, N/A: nonapplicable, Cr: cranial, and Cd: caudal.Based on MR images, the IVD space was collapsed in six patients and enlarged in four patients (Figure6). There was a decrease in the T2-signal intensity of the IVD space in six patients and an increase in two patients. In these two patients, there was also an increase in the size of the IVD space. Rupture of the dorsal part of the annulus fibrosus of the affected disc was identified in all patients, and rupture of the ventral part of the annulus fibrosus was observed in six dogs (Figure 6). Subluxation or deviation of the main spinal axis was seen on MR images in seven patients (all dogs), with ventral displacement of the caudal segment in six dogs and right-sided displacement in one dog. Although they went undetected on radiographs, spinous process fractures were identified in three dogs (Figure 6), and articular process fractures were observed in two additional dogs (Table 2).Figure 6
Postcontrast sagittal (a) and transverse (b) T1-weighted MR images of two different dogs showing rupture of dorsal and ventral annulus fibrosus of L3-L4 intervertebral disc (blue arrows), increase in the size of L3-L4 intervertebral disc space (∗), fracture of spinous process of L3 (white arrow), and enhancement of epaxial muscles (yellow arrows).
(a)(b)Extradural material resulting in obliteration of the epidural fat was observed in five patients. In one dog, this material was considered to cause spinal cord compression, justifying a foraminotomy to remove the compressing material in addition to spinal stabilization. An increase in T2-signal intensity of the spinal cord was identified in four patients. Deformation of the spinal cord was considered mild in two patients, moderate in four, and severe in one. In three additional patients, there was no evidence of spinal cord deformation. An increase in T2-signal intensity and enhancement of adjacent epaxial muscles was observed in seven patients (Figure6). Changes were bilateral in six patients and unilateral in one. Muscle lesions extended between one and four vertebral bodies, mainly caudally to the injury.Combining radiographic and MRI findings, instability was suspected in all patients (Figure1), with all three compartments affected in six patients and two compartments affected in the remaining four (Table 3).Table 3
Neurological status upon admission with spinal injury assessment, implants used, clinical outcome, and radiographic evolution of implants at 3 weeks postoperatively.
SpeciesInjured siteNeurological status before surgeryNumber of injured compartmentsChanges in T2-W sequences/deformation of spinal cord (no, mild, moderate, and severe) according to MRI cross-section measurementCompressive materialSurgical approachMain implant in all cases: 5-hole 2-0 UniLock plateRadiographic evaluation at 3 weeks postopNeurological status at 3 weeks postopDogTh12-Th13Gr0 MNC3No change in the spinal cordModerate deformationDiscal material on the left side of cranial border of Th13Thoracic, foraminotomy4 locking screws, 1.5 mm pinPlate AImplant in placeNo loss of vertebral alignmentGr0DogTh11-Th12Gr1 MNC3Increased intensity of T2 signal in spinal cordModerate deformationNoneThoracic4 locking screws, 1.5 mm pinPlate APullout of distal locking screwNo loss of vertebral alignmentGr4DogL3-L4Gr2 MNC3No change in spinal cord signalNo deformationNoneLateral lumbar4 locking screws, all monocorticalPlate AImplant in placeNo loss of vertebral alignmentGr4DogL2-L3Gr2 MNC2No change in spinal cord signalNo deformationNoneLateral lumbar1 cortical screw, 3 locking screws, and 2 bicortical screwsPlate BImplant in placeNo loss of vertebral alignmentGr4DogTh12-Th13Gr3b MNC2No change in spinal cord signalModerate deformationNoneThoracic4 locking screwsPlate BImplant in placeNo loss of vertebral alignmentGr4DogL2-L3Gr1 MNC3Increased intensity of T2 signal in spinal cordMild deformationNoneLumbar4 locking screws, all monocorticalPlate AOne 2 mm UniLock facet screwBending of facet screwNo loss of vertebral alignmentGr3bDogL1-L2Gr 2 MNC2No change in spinal cord signalModerate deformationNoneLateral lumbar4 locking screws, all monocorticalPlate AImplant in placeNo loss of vertebral alignmentGr3aDogTh12-Th13Gr1 MNC3Increased intensity of T2 signal in spinal cordSevere deformationNoneThoracic4 monocortical locking screwsPlate A1.8 mm pinBreakage of one distal locking screw and pullout of another at the end of plateNo loss of vertebral alignmentGr3aCatL4-L5Gr0 MNP3Increased intensity of T2 signal in spinal cordMild swelling of spinal cordNo deformationNoneDorsal lumbar4 monocortical locking screwsPlate ATwo 1 mm facet screwsImplant in placeNo loss of vertebral alignmentGr0catL2-L3Gr3b MNC2No change in spinal cord signalMild deformationNoneDorsal lumbar4 locking screws, 1 mm facet screwPlate BImplant in placeNo loss of vertebral alignmentGr4UMN: upper motor neuron, LMN: lower motor neuron, Plate A: 1.5 mm thick plate with 8 mm interhole distance, and Plate B: 1.3 mm thick plate with 6.5 mm interhole distance.No patient experienced a worsening of their neurological status postoperatively. Based on postoperative radiographs, reduction of subluxation and restoration of the main spinal axis were identified in all patients (Figure5). Implantation of the UniLock screws in the affected vertebral bodies was monocortical in 38 out of the 40 screws inserted (95%). In dogs treated with an intrathoracic surgical approach, the insertion of the pin bridging the affected intervertebral space was satisfactory in two out of three patients. In the remaining patient, the pin penetrated the vertebral endplate of T12, but it was not anchored in the body. No screws penetrated the adjacent healthy IVD space (Table 3).Postoperative MRI studies showed an absence of spinal cord deformation in all nine patients on whom MRI was performed. No implant penetrated the vertebral canal (Figure7). Minor susceptibility artifacts were produced by the stainless steel facet screw and additional pins used in the thoracic region, but no artifacts due to the UniLock 2-0 osteosynthesis plate were identified. Nevertheless, susceptibility artifacts did not interfere with the evaluation of the vertebral canal (Figure 7).Figure 7
Postoperative transverse T1-weighted MR images of lumbar (a, b, and c) and thoracic (d) spine of four different dogs showing implantation of monocortical screws (arrow). Minor susceptibility artifacts are associated with orthopedic implants (∗). Angle (α) of implantation in lumbar vertebra is close to expected [26, 29].At the three-week follow-up evaluation, neurological status had improved in eight patients with an improvement of 1 to 2 grades compared to the preoperative evaluation (Table4). In the two remaining patients (one dog and one cat), no change in the neurological score was observed. These two patients were those with the worst neurological status upon admission (grade 0). The cat was euthanized three months postoperatively owing to poor quality of life. Radiographs performed during the first follow-up evaluation showed no evidence of recurrence of subluxation in any patient. Although no plate failure or displacement was identified, in two patients with a thoracic lesion (Table 3), two locking screws placed at the extremity of the plate slightly pulled out (Figure 8), and another screw broke at the junction between the shaft and the head. In another patient (one dog), one of the facet screws was bent but not broken, with no consequence on the plate (Figure 8). For these three patients with partial implant failure, radiographs performed during additional follow-up evaluations showed no further screw movements or implant failure. One dog died of an unrelated cause five months after surgery. In the remaining eight patients (seven dogs and one cat), neurological improvement continued during the follow-up period, including in the dog, which showed no improvement after three weeks.Table 4
Follow-up of clinical cases.
SpeciesPreoperativeImmediate postoperative follow-upFollow-up 1Follow-up 2Follow-up 3Follow-up 4Interview or follow-up >12 monthsMFSMFSNWASMFSType of follow-upNWASMFSType of follow-upNWASMFSType of follow-upNWASMFSType of follow-upDog0 UMN0 UMN20Radiographs61Radiographs✔Dog1 UMN1 UMN34Radiographs✔Dog2 UMN2 UMN34Radiographs65Radiographs✔Dog2 UMN2 UMN34Radiographs64Radiographs95Radiographs16NoNSRadiographs✔Dog3b UMN3b UMN34Radiographs65Clinical examDeath 5 months after traumaDog1 UMN1 UMN23bRadiographs44Radiographs✔Dog2 UMN2 UMN43aRadiographs84Radiographs28NoNSRadiographs✔Dog1 UMN1 UMN43aRadiographs18NoNSRadiographs✔Cat0 LMN0 LMN30Radiographs150RadiographsEuthanasia 3 months after traumaCat3b UMN3b UMN34Radiographs✔MFS: modified Frankel score according to Levine et al. 2006 [43], NWAS: number of weeks after surgery, UMN: upper motor neuron, LMN: lower motor neuron, and NoNS: no neurological sign.Figure 8
Lateral radiograph of the caudal thoracic spine (a) and ventrodorsal radiograph of the lumbar spine (b) three weeks postoperatively of two different dogs showing (a) slight withdrawal of most caudal screw (arrow) and (b) bending of facet screw (arrow).
(a)(b)After 12 months, remote evaluation of locomotion showed no gait abnormality nor signs of pain in seven patients. The remaining patient was able to maintain a standing position and perform a few voluntary movements but was still nonambulatory 15 months after the trauma.


## 4. Discussion

The current study examined thoracolumbar injuries, which are the most commonly injured area of the spinal column in cats and dogs [4, 5]. This provides homogeneity in the study population despite the small sample size (n = 10). We also focused on vertebral luxation/subluxation, excluding patients with vertebral body fractures, so that the locking implant could be fully secured in the adjacent vertebral bodies. Road traffic accident was the predominant cause of trauma in six out of ten cases, as previously reported [5]. The overrepresentation of dogs in this sample may be due to a difference in medicalization between dogs and cats in our referral population. Cats are also more prone to vertebral body fracture than to luxation/subluxation in case of spinal trauma [5].A combination of radiographs and MRI was used in this study to assess pre- and postsurgical spinal changes. Although CT has been shown to be more sensitive than radiographs in the diagnosis of spinal cord trauma [6], this modality was not easily available during the course of this study. MRI has been reported to be an accurate method to assess vertebral instability resulting from traumatic injuries [7, 8]. In addition, the excellent contrast resolution of the soft tissues provided by MRI allows the IVD space, the extradural space, the meninges, the spinal cord, and the surrounding epaxial muscles to be assessed [7–14]. Combining CT to assess bony structures and MRI to assess soft tissue structures has been suggested for a thorough evaluation of the injured spine [8]. Radiography and MRI were considered to be complementary for the same reasons and, although not ideal, were used in this study for logistic reasons. Indeed, radiographic findings exclusively included changes in bone integrity (fractures) and relative position of the vertebrae (luxation; subluxation). Interestingly, ventral displacement of the caudal segment was observed only in dogs and dorsal displacement only in cats. This species difference was demonstrated previously in a larger cohort and may be due to anatomical differences and forces involved during trauma [5]. It has been pointed out that dorsal displacement of the caudal segment is almost impossible without a fracture of the articular processes or luxation of the zygapophyseal joint [5].MRI studies confirmed bony changes in most cases, although the latter were often conspicuous on radiographs. However, MRI also revealed several undetected fractures, all located in the dorsal compartment. MRI studies provided invaluable information on the soft tissue structures of the spine and were also particularly helpful in assessing spinal cord instability using the three-compartment method [7]. The IVD is central in this evaluation because the annulus fibrosus of the disc is involved in both ventral and intermediate compartments [7]. The integrity of the dorsal and ventral annulus fibrosus on MR images was a key point in assessing spinal instability in our patients.The T2-signal intensity of the affected IVD space was modified in most patients. As observed in six patients, a decrease in T2-signal intensity may have been the result of traumatic disc extrusion or previous disc degenerative changes. The increase in T2-signal intensity of the IVD space observed in two patients in association with an increase in the size of the IVD space may have been caused by fluid/blood accumulation due to local depression.MRI studies were invaluable to identify the spinal cord changes, that is, deformation [10] and increase in T2-signal intensity [7, 11, 12], which were not visible on radiographs. Spinal cord deformation was mainly associated with changes in the main spinal axis due to luxation/subluxation and compression by extruded disc material (n = 1). No spinal cord deformation was observed in postoperative MRI studies, owing to the reduction of the subluxation/luxation and removal of the extruded disc material. The increase in T2-signal intensity of the spinal cord in patients with traumatic injury may have been caused by edema, hemorrhage, ischemia, or cell injury caused by direct spinal cord contusion or laceration [7]. Although our sample size did not allow us to perform valuable statistical analysis, all four patients with T2-hyperintense intramedullary changes were graded 0 or 1 upon admission, suggesting severe spinal cord injuries. Changes in signal intensity of the spinal cord are considered to be a valuable prognostic indicator in patients with spinal cord injury due to disc disease [11, 12, 16]. Nevertheless, three patients with initial intramedullary T2-signal changes had a satisfactory recovery after surgical stabilization, thus suggesting that these changes were potentially reversible.Changes in T2-signal intensity of the epaxial muscles adjacent to the spinal injury were observed in most patients in the current study, corroborating previous similar findings [7]. These changes were thought to be primarily due to edema, inflammation, contusion, or laceration as a result of direct trauma. However, they could also be due to secondary muscle ischemia, spasm, or denervation, as previously described in patients with acute disc extrusion [13–15]. No change in signal intensity of the hypaxial muscles was observed in this study, supporting direct trauma as the most likely cause of epaxial muscles signal changes rather than secondary lesions.The results of this study indicate that use of the 2-0 UniLock implant to stabilize the thoracolumbar spine results in satisfactory long-term recovery in most dogs and cats with traumatic spinal subluxation and presumed instability.Using a titanium implant allows MRI examinations to be performed since titanium causes very few paramagnetic artifacts [3, 39], as confirmed by postoperative and follow-up studies. We used such a construct to provide relative stability to the spine [30]. The use of a VCP plate was previously recommended as an elastic stabilization of the spinal unit in order to limit the risks of screw pullout in a mobile part of the spine, that is, the thoracolumbar junction [30]. Using titanium, whose Young’s modulus is only half that of 316L stainless steel [40] and closer to that of cortical bone, could thus be advantageous. A study using an ex vivo bovine spine model also suggested that titanium has a lower fatigue failure risk than a stainless steel construct thanks to greater yield stress [41].However, the choice of this implant was primarily dictated by the intrinsic characteristics of the plate, allowing it to be centered on the affected IVD space and to insert two screws in each vertebral body without any risk of intrusion in the adjacent IVD space. Limiting the number of locking screws reduces the rigidity of a locking construct [3].Plates of two different sizes were used, depending on the size of the vertebral bodies as measured on radiographic and sagittal MR images. Although none of our patients exceeded 25 kg, larger plates may be needed for larger dogs.Locking implants have several advantages. They preserve reduction and [3] do not need to be placed on a tension bone surface. They can therefore be used on the vertebral body in the ventral compartment [3]. UniLock plates have also been found to have better resistance to cyclic loads when used with locking implants as opposed to standard ones in a human mandible model [42]. Perfect contouring of the plate to the bone surface is not needed with this type of implant [3], which is a major advantage in this region where the shape of the vertebrae is irregular. In the current study, although the plate was slightly contoured to ease bone-plate contact, it was not adapted to the bone surface perfectly, thus saving surgical time. The presence of a vacant hole at the level of the IVD space did not seem to weaken the fixation [3], as no plate breakage was observed in our series. This hole may even be used to center the plate on the injured intervertebral space during surgery. In our construct, this central vacant hole could also limit the stiffness of the fixation [3].To anchor the UniLock plate, we preferred using monocortical locking screws. Their biomechanical performance has been shown to be equivalent to that of bicortical screws or pins implanted in the cervical spine in ex vivo models [18]. In a monocortical setting, the unique bone-screw interface is critical, and screw pullout may be a common complication [3]. To limit these risks, we slightly contoured the implant to obtain divergent screws [3]. We used a self-tapping locking implant with an advantageous thread-shaft ratio, and we used a drill stop with a preset drilling depth to optimize anchorage [28]. The main advantage of using monocortical locking screws is a lower risk of intruding into the vertebral canal and causing damage to the adjacent vascular structures. In our series, none of the screws penetrated the vertebral canal, and all screws except two were indeed monocortical. The risk of damage to the vascular structures is particularly high in the thoracic region, where the proximity of major vessels and the limited dorsal implantation corridor in dogs [26, 30–33] justify a ventral thoracotomy approach. A left thoracotomy should be preferred because of the position of the caudal vena cava [30, 32]. This ventral approach also allows for better visual control of the reduction of the luxation/subluxation and easier fixation of the implants in the vertebral bodies. A ventral approach is not justified in the lumbar region, where the dorsal implantation corridors are wider [26, 45] and underlying vascular structures, that is, aorta and caudal vena cava, are protected by the quadratus lumborum and psoas muscles. We opted for a lateral approach to the vertebral bodies in the lumbar region to have better exposure, limit muscle interference with the locking guides, limit further trauma to the epaxial muscles, and improve bone purchase as well as the angle of implantation [29].A dorsal approach was performed only when a facet screw had to be placed. Epaxial muscles are directly responsible for the extension of the spine [13] and play an essential role in its stability [20]. Protecting these muscles was thus a major concern during surgery and contributed to choosing this approach and the use of a unilateral UniLock implant.Partial implant failure occurred only in three dogs in our study and did not result in instability requiring revision surgery. These complications occurred with screws placed at the extremity of the plate in two patients with thoracic subluxation associated with articular process fractures. These patients had a major disc injury with complete rupture to the annulus fibrosus dorsally and ventrally, causing damage to all three compartments. The annulus fibrosus is a key element in the rotational stability of the spine, especially when the intervertebral facets are absent [46]. In both patients, we concluded that excessive rotational instability was the most likely cause of partial implant failure, despite the use of a pin securing the two vertebral bodies. An ex vivo study suggested that when a unilateral articular process fracture or luxation is present, a locking plate should be placed on the ipsilateral side to protect the construct, thus allowing the plate to act as a tension band during lateral bending [35]. We were unable to verify this hypothesis in our two patients. We placed both plates on the left side, and the articular process fracture was on the left in one patient and on the right side in the other patient.We also observed the bending of a facet screw in the lumbar region without plate failure in one dog with suspected major instability (failure of all three compartments). In addition to rupture of the annulus fibrosus, this patient had major damage in the dorsal compartment (bilateral zygapophyseal joint luxation, fracture of the spinous process of L3, and marked hyperintensities of epaxial muscles). Facet implants were used to protect the plate from strain when it is not tensioned. According to Shores and Walker, ventral flexion forces are the most important ones to neutralize during spinal subluxation, especially when the dorsal compartment is involved in association with complete rupture of the annulus fibrosus [22, 45]. Experimental studies have shown that implants positioned in the ventral and dorsal compartments [22, 47] and in an orthogonal position [30] seem to better resist these bending forces. Facet screws also helped maintain the reduction and alignment of the vertebral bodies during the placement of the plate. Compressive material, when present, was therefore removed by performing a foraminotomy to preserve the articular processes and avoid any subsequent destabilization of the spine.The small number of patients and the retrospective nature of this series are major limitations. We chose to select patients with the same kind of spinal injury (luxation/subluxation) in the same location (thoracolumbar area) and treated with the same kind of implants to have a homogeneous and meaningful sample. This study may be considered as a preliminary study justifying further research with larger samples of patients suffering from thoracolumbar luxation/subluxation and treated with a unilateral UniLock plate.


## 5. Conclusion

In this limited series, the relative stability provided by a 2-0 UniLock plate with monocortical locking screws suggests that it may be sufficient to limit the risk of implant failure and provide support for healing. The few minor surgical complications did not interfere with the clinical outcomes and did not require revision surgery. The major advantage of using a low-profile locking plate in patients with thoracolumbar instability is to limit both the surgical approach and the stiffness of the treated IVD space, subsequently reducing the surgical footprint.



---

*Source: 5112274-2022-04-26.xml*