# Broadband Circular Polarizer Based on Multilayer Gradual Frequency Selective Surfaces

Authors: Wei Zhang; Jian-ying Li; Ling Wang
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

This paper presents a broadband circular polarizer based on multilayer gradual frequency selective surfaces. The unit cell includes two identical circles and a bar, whose dimensions decrease layer by layer with a reduction factor. This design can provide a good phase difference that is close to 90°. The bandwidth of the polarizer reaches 66.7%, from 7.9 to 15.8 GHz, which can convert the incident linear polarization waves into circular polarization waves. A sample polarizer is fabricated and measured. The results show that the operation frequency ranges from 7.75 to 15.2 GHz, coinciding with the simulation. Meanwhile, the working frequency band covers the range of 8.2–14.5 GHz when the incident angle increases to 25°.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Circular polarizers, which converts linear polarization waves (LPWs) to circular polarization waves (CPWs), are of great importance in many applications where the diversity of polarization is desired [1]. For example, circular polarizers are applied in minimizing the effectiveness of Faraday rotation incurred by the ionosphere of the satellite systems [2]. Also, they can be utilized to mitigate echoes from rain or suppressing interference in communicational systems [3, 4]. A variety of polarization converters have already been proven nowadays [5], for instance, alternate medium plate of various materials [6], four-arm structure [7], lattice structures utilizing rods or strips [8], and rectangular slot antenna [9]. However, most of these polarizers are limited by their operational bandwidth.It is quite a good way to get CPW by employing frequency selective surfaces (FSS), which has been successfully practiced in former circular polarizers. Because of the low profile and the sample fabrication, FSS is more attractive among periodic structures.As discussed in [10], a single layer polarizer is proposed for remote environmental monitoring, which can be conveniently implemented in the submillimeter wave range. The 3 dB axial ratios (AR) bandwidth of this polarizer is nearly 11.75%. In [11], the bandwidth increases to 21% based on the same unit cell geometry. The polarizer in [12] is made up of Jerusalem-cross, which provides nearly 99% polarization purity at the operation frequency, yet the bandwidth is only 4.3%. With a similar high purity, [13] offers a dual-band polarization convertor based on two concentric rings. The total bandwidth is up to 9.9% while the insertion loss increases to 5.1 dB. In [14], the authors found that the insertion loss could be significantly reduced by adding one FSS layer. Table 1 shows the comparison of these circular polarizers.Table 1
Comparison of circular polarizers.
Ref.
Size of unit cell (×λ
3mm3)
Frequency (GHz)
AR < 3 dBBandwidth (%)
[10]
0.51 × 0.59 × 0.01
325
11.75
[11]
0.51 × 0.59 × 0.01
325
21
[12]
0.33 × 0.33 × 0.09
17.8
4.3
[13]
0.56 × 0.56 × 0.08
27.21
5.6
39.55
4.3
[14]
0.60 × 0.52 × 0.03
10
6.8
This paper
0.3 × 0.6 × 0.24
12
66.7In this paper, a broadband circular polarizer is presented based on multilayer gradual frequency selective surfaces (MG-FSS). The AR lower than 3 dB are over the frequency range from 7.9 GHz to 15.8 GHz. Meanwhile, the polarizer can obtain the working frequency band over the range of 8.2–14.5 GHz when the incident angle increases to 25°.


## 2. Principle of Operation

Polarization of a plane wave is the direction of its electric field vector, which may be in a fixed orientation or might alter over time. CPW is featured by electric field in which the two orthogonal parts have the same amplitude and a phase difference of 90°. A LPW passes through a polarizer, which offers such feature between two orthogonal parts. In this way, a CPW is obtained.The proposed circular polarizer is shown in Figure1(a). Each layer consists of two identical circles and a bar in the middle of the unit. We superimpose a four-layer architecture, which can achieve not only the desired phase difference but also a good transmission coefficient. It should be noted that the size of the FSS strip in each layer varies gradually. Figure 1(b) presents the front view of the metal strip, where n denotes the nth layer. The first is the biggest one, and the other three are diminishing according to the reduction factor η.Figure 1
(a) The unit cell of the MG-FSS. (b) Geometry of each layer.
(a)
(b)Consider an incident LPW traveling along the −z direction, whose electric field E
→
i is slant at ψ
=
45
° to the x-axis. The incident LPW can be decomposed into two even parts in horizontal and vertical directions accordingly:(1)
E
→
i
=
E
→
x
i
+
E
→
y
i
=
E
0
x
^
+
y
^
e
j
k
z
,where the unit vectors x
^ and y
^ are parallel and perpendicular to the metal bar, respectively. Generally, the incident LPW can be decomposed into E
→
x
i and E
→
y
i, which are in the same phase and magnitude. Ideally, the two parts will be completely transmitted without reflection and insertion loss. One step further, the FSS provides an inductive behavior for E
→
x
i mainly because of the metal bar in x-direction, while the FSS becomes capacitive for E
→
y
i due to the nonmetal in y-direction. The transmitted wave can also be presented as a sum of two orthogonal linearly polarized components with equal magnitudes:(2)
E
→
t
=
E
→
x
t
+
E
→
y
t
=
E
0
T
x
x
^
+
T
y
y
^
e
j
k
z
,where T
x
=
T
x
e
j
φ
x and T
y
=
T
y
e
j
φ
y are the transmission coefficients of E
→
x
i and E
→
y
i, respectively. The metal bar in x-direction and the nonmetal in y-direction provide different transmission characteristics for the two orthogonal electric field vectors. The phase of the x-direction part is delayed by φ
x, while that of the y-direction part is advanced by φ
y. Thus, a phase difference Δ
φ
=
φ
x
-
φ
y appears between the two components at the output of the polarizer. If the parameters of the polarizer are adjusted to satisfy T
x
=
T
y and Δ
φ
=
90
°, then CPW can be produced.


## 3. Optimization Design and Manufacturing

The proposed polarizer operates in X-band. In the following experiments, a four-layer polarizer, with each layer consisting of18
×
36 elements, is fabricated and tested. The metallic layers are modeled as a 0.05 mm copper film with an electric conductivity σ
=
5.8
×
1
0
7 S/m. The substrate is selected as Arlon Diclad 880 with a relative permittivity of 2.2 and a dielectric loss tangent of 0.009, whose thickness is t
=
2 mm. Figure 2 shows the sample polarizer. As shown in Figure 1, the dimensions of the biggest layer are a
=
7.5 mm, b
=
15 mm, l
1
=
2.5 mm, w
1
=
3 mm, and r
1
=
2.4 mm. The reduction factor η
=
0.9, which means that the size of the metal strip in one layer reduces to 90% compared to that of the previous layer, while the location is a constant.Figure 2
The fabricated polarizer and the four layers of the unit. The size is diminished from the top down.A vector network analyzer (VNA) is applied to measure the polarizer, which is in connection with the two standard LP horn antennas which radiate electromagnetic waves in a broadband of 7–16 GHz. The horn antennas are aligned for maximum reception and the transmitting one is set to provide a LPW whose electric field is oriented 45° to thex-axis. The prototype has been put in the middle between two antennas. Besides, all the helpful information of transmission for various polarizations can be obtained through transforming the directions of the two LP horn antennas.In order to better illustrate the polarized conversion of the MG-FSS discussed in the paper, the axial ratio is calculated as(3)
A
R
=
1
/
a
cos
2
⁡
τ
+
sin
⁡
2
τ
cos
⁡
Δ
φ
+
a
sin
2
⁡
τ
1
/
a
sin
2
⁡
τ
-
sin
⁡
2
τ
cos
⁡
Δ
φ
+
a
cos
2
⁡
τ
(4)
a
=
E
→
x
t
E
→
y
t
(5)
tan
⁡
2
τ
=
2
a
1
-
a
cos
⁡
Δ
φ
,where E
→
x
t and E
→
y
t refer to the maximum magnitudes of the horizontal and vertical transmission parts in the electric field. The inclination angle τ of the ellipse can be generated by (5).The magnitudes of the transmission coefficientsT
x and T
y are shown in Figure 3, as well as the phase difference Δ
φ. Due to the measured conclusion for finite units instead of an infinite periodic structure in simulation, there is a little bit of deflection between the simulated and measured results. Figure 4 shows the simulated and measured AR of the transmitted wave. A rational agreement between the simulated and measured results is detected. The operation bandwidth of the proposed structure will reach 66.7%, ranging from 7.9 GHz to 15.8 GHz. The actual measurement results indicate that the fabricated device can work as a circular polarizer over the frequency range from 7.75 GHz to 15.2 GHz. The differences between numerical simulations and experimental results can be explained by the fact that the measured results are for the finite elements while the simulation results are for infinite periodic units. Moreover, machining tolerance, border effects, and slight ellipticity of the incident LPW may also deteriorate the measured results.Figure 3
The simulated and measured magnitudes of the transmission coefficientsT
x and T
y, and the phase difference Δ
φ.Figure 4
The simulated and measured AR.For better illustration, polarization ellipses are plotted on the basis of the measure results. Eight uniformly spaced frequency points along the working band are plotted to observe the polarization. Figure5 shows the ellipses of the CPW obtained at 8–15 GHz with a step of 1 GHz.Figure 5
Polarization ellipses of the proposed polarizer based on the measure results.


## 4. Discussion

### 4.1. Oblique Incidence

The transmission features of any periodic structure would vary according to the change of incidence angleθ
i
n
c Different angles of oblique incidence are assessed. It can be seen from Figure 6 that as θ
i
n
c increases, the bandwidth varies slightly while the AR changes remarkably. It is notable that such deterioration proves to be more pronounced for higher frequencies. In addition, the AR close to the center frequency is stable. The experimental results show that the proposed circular polarizer can make the AR under 3 dB over the range of 8.2–14.5 GHz, when the incident angle increases to 25°.Figure 6
The simulated and measured AR.


### 4.2. Reduction Factor

One of the most important parameters in the designed polarizer is the reduction factorη. Figure 7 displays the simulated variation as η changes from 0.7 to 1. It is clear to see that the reduction factor has a large impact on the performance. Circular polarization characteristics gradually get better with the increase of η. However, the AR becomes unsatisfactory when the reduction factor reaches 1. It means that the structure could no longer be used as a circular polarizer if the four layers are the same. Extensive experiments show that the main reason is the phase difference of the two orthogonal components of the transmitted waves. In the second section, we discuss the relationship between the circular polarization and the phase difference. For this structure, the electromagnetic waves will produce certain phase difference Δ
φ
n through each layer and different size generates different phase difference. When the waves pass through the entire polarizer, the difference between the two orthogonal components of the transmitted waves Δ
φ is the superposition of all Δ
φ
n. It should be noted that Δ
φ
n are not identical to each other because of the coupling of layers and their different dimensions.Figure 7
The simulated variation as the reduction factor.According to the simulation results, the waveforms of the two orthogonal waves through each layer are presented. Figure8 shows the waveforms at 12 GHz when η
=
0.9 and η
=
1, respectively. E
x
i is the incident wave; E
x
n and E
y
n (n
=
1,2
,
3) denote the electric fields through the nth layer in the x direction and y direction, respectively. E
x
t represents the electric field through the fourth layer, which is also the transmitted wave. Figure 8 displays that periodic units of each layer produce discrepant effect on the two parts. When the waves pass through the fourth layer, Δ
φ approximates 90° if η
=
0.9. In this way, a LPW can be successfully converted into a CPW. If all the layers are the same, Δ
φ is only about 55°. Therefore, the structure cannot be used as a circular polarizer any more.Figure 8
The waveforms at 12 GHz: (a) reduction factor is 0.9; (b) reduction factor is 1.
(a)
(b)It is worth noting that, in the process of the experiment, we also found that the proposed polarizer does not exist positively or negatively. That is, whether the propagation of electromagnetic waves is +z or −z, the results are the same.


## 4.1. Oblique Incidence

The transmission features of any periodic structure would vary according to the change of incidence angleθ
i
n
c Different angles of oblique incidence are assessed. It can be seen from Figure 6 that as θ
i
n
c increases, the bandwidth varies slightly while the AR changes remarkably. It is notable that such deterioration proves to be more pronounced for higher frequencies. In addition, the AR close to the center frequency is stable. The experimental results show that the proposed circular polarizer can make the AR under 3 dB over the range of 8.2–14.5 GHz, when the incident angle increases to 25°.Figure 6
The simulated and measured AR.


## 4.2. Reduction Factor

One of the most important parameters in the designed polarizer is the reduction factorη. Figure 7 displays the simulated variation as η changes from 0.7 to 1. It is clear to see that the reduction factor has a large impact on the performance. Circular polarization characteristics gradually get better with the increase of η. However, the AR becomes unsatisfactory when the reduction factor reaches 1. It means that the structure could no longer be used as a circular polarizer if the four layers are the same. Extensive experiments show that the main reason is the phase difference of the two orthogonal components of the transmitted waves. In the second section, we discuss the relationship between the circular polarization and the phase difference. For this structure, the electromagnetic waves will produce certain phase difference Δ
φ
n through each layer and different size generates different phase difference. When the waves pass through the entire polarizer, the difference between the two orthogonal components of the transmitted waves Δ
φ is the superposition of all Δ
φ
n. It should be noted that Δ
φ
n are not identical to each other because of the coupling of layers and their different dimensions.Figure 7
The simulated variation as the reduction factor.According to the simulation results, the waveforms of the two orthogonal waves through each layer are presented. Figure8 shows the waveforms at 12 GHz when η
=
0.9 and η
=
1, respectively. E
x
i is the incident wave; E
x
n and E
y
n (n
=
1,2
,
3) denote the electric fields through the nth layer in the x direction and y direction, respectively. E
x
t represents the electric field through the fourth layer, which is also the transmitted wave. Figure 8 displays that periodic units of each layer produce discrepant effect on the two parts. When the waves pass through the fourth layer, Δ
φ approximates 90° if η
=
0.9. In this way, a LPW can be successfully converted into a CPW. If all the layers are the same, Δ
φ is only about 55°. Therefore, the structure cannot be used as a circular polarizer any more.Figure 8
The waveforms at 12 GHz: (a) reduction factor is 0.9; (b) reduction factor is 1.
(a)
(b)It is worth noting that, in the process of the experiment, we also found that the proposed polarizer does not exist positively or negatively. That is, whether the propagation of electromagnetic waves is +z or −z, the results are the same.


## 5. Conclusion

A broadband circular polarizer based on multilayer gradual frequency selective surfaces has been presented in this paper. The investigated results show that the 3 dB AR bandwidth for the proposed polarizer reaches 66.7% at normal incidence from 7.9 to 15.8 GHz. Also, a sample polarizer is fabricated and tested. The measured results show that the sample can operate from 7.75 to 15.2 GHz, which is in a reasonable agreement with simulation results. Meanwhile, the polarizer can obtain a working frequency band over the range of 8.2–14.5 GHz when the incident angle is as high as 25°.



---

*Source: 4928109-2016-09-07.xml*