# Exploration on Mechanical Behaviours of Hyacinth Fibre Particles Reinforced Polymer Matrix-Based Hybrid Composites for Electronic Applications

Authors: Pradeep Kumar Panda; J. Jebastine; Madhialagan Ramarao; Shaik Fairooz; Chirra Kesava Reddy; Omaima Nasif; Saleh Alfarraj; Velu Manikandan; I. Jenish
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

Biocomposites with polylactic acid (PLA), nanosilica parts, and water hyacinth fibres have been developed in this experimental study. By changing the weight percentage of nanosilica particulate matter (0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 percent) with PLA and water hyacinth fibres, five composite mates were produced through a double screw extruder and compression moulding machine. According to the ASTM standards, the process to machine, the composite specimens have been adopted from the water jet machining process. The tensile, compression, flexural, impact, hardness, and water absorption tests were performed on the composite specimens to assess various mechanical properties and absorbance behaviour. The test findings reveal the significant improvement in the tensile and flexural properties of the composites. Composites contain 6 percent of the fine nanosilica particles by weight. Concerning adding the growing weight percentage (4 percent) of nanosilica particles to the composites, the water absorption properties of the composites have significantly improved. The tensile strength of 6% nanosilica mixed specimens showed the highest tensile stress rate as 36.93 MPa; the value was nearly 3.5% higher than the 4% nanosilica mixed composite specimens.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Researchers have become particularly concerned with reducing their use of synthetic plastics because of environmental problems caused by plastic waste, not biodegradable. Synthetic mixing with biological (hybrid) materials and using fully biodegradable materials have been included in recent innovations. Bioplastics have been developing in the last ten years to replace synthetic plastics [1]. In most modern engineering fields, composites’ most advanced physical features are more used against conventional metallic and alloying materials. Despite the high technical and physical features of the alloys, scientists are still trying to detect the new composite material due to its high strength to rigidity ratio, resistance to corrosion, and cost factors. Consistent positive deterministic factors have also been found in the enhanced polymer materials (FRPs) [2], such as low weight, high stiffness-to-weight ratios, good chemical resistance, and corrosion resistance. Generally polymer matrix composites are widely used in aerospace, automobile, and electronic applications. The manufacture of printed circuit boards (PCBs) reached an all-time high of $51 billion in 2009, thanks to the rising demand for electronic devices. However, the PCB industry’s rapid growth encourages it to focus on circuit innovation rather than the environmental impact of the materials used. It is necessary to take a fresh approach to the creation of more environmentally friendly foundation materials. Most commercial PCB materials are glass fibre cloth reinforced epoxy composites because they provide a suitable combination of mechanical and electrical qualities. Figure 1 reveals the schematic diagram of printed circuit boards.Figure 1
Schematic diagram of printed circuit boards.Figure2 reveals the types of fibre. Water hyacinth is a possible source of low-cost, nontoxic, and abundant natural fibre in Indonesia. The fibre content is comparable to that from other sources [3] and has approximately 40% cellulose content. The content of cellulose has a considerable impact on biocomposite properties. Like the previous study [4, 5], the high content of cellulose leads to better mechanical and thermal properties. The commonly used natural fibres are microfibers of a diameter of 1–1000 μm (micron metre) or nanofibers of a diameter of 1–100 nanometres [6, 7]. In previous research studies, microfibers from kenaf [8], water hyacinth [9, 10], ramie [11, 12], vacuous palm oil bunches [13], and microalgae’s [14] were used. However, when dispersed in a stretch matrix, these microfibers usually form agglomerations or porosities, which produce low mechanical characteristics. Fibre must be nanosized to reduce agglomeration. Due to the high contact surface area, lower density, and good mechanical properties, smaller fibres result in better biocomposites [6, 15, 16]. Different cheap filler materials have been attempted in conjunction with these to reduce the cost to the total composite output to increase the strength of the FRPs. In most research publications [17, 18], silica has played a role in this sequence of filler materials such as calcium carbonate. A novel approach was to produce tough epoxy resin made from rice husk with a particle size distribution of 40–80 nm [19]. This study will discuss the Charpy impact comportment of composites based on WH fibre. This research shows that the impact strength of polymer composites is based on WH fibre compounds. It is sufficiently competitive compared to other composites based on natural fibre [20]. There was an increase in the tensile characteristics, impact strength, and fatigue life of reinforced glass-fiber composites by adding silica nanoparticles to the contents [21]. The incorporation of silica particles reveals a beneficial effect on the elasticity module, flexural modulus, and hardness of 2 wt% threshold value. However, silica’s tensile and bending strength are reduced by a slightly higher bending strength than their tensile parts [22]. Increased interfacial bonding for Basalt fibre reinforced epoxy composite is added by adding SiO2 nanoparticles to the fibre surface [23]. Epoxy/silica/kenaf composites with different concentrations have been manufactured with silica particles. Untreated kenaf fibres with modified silica epoxy composites have increased their flexural and impact strength [24]. Aquatic plants like water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) have a rapid growth rate, making them undesirable as garden plants. Water hyacinth’s rapid growth has led to low levels of dissolved oxygen in the water, and it can spread across large areas. Water hyacinth is not all bad. It absorbs heavy metals and provides livestock feed, and its fibre can be used to make handicrafts [25, 26]. It is found that for water hyacinth-polypropylene composites, except traction strength, all mechanical properties are improved adequately. In the course of this study, water hyacinth fibre was chosen as a refurbishment, and nanosilica particles were chosen as the filler materials for polylactic acid (PLA). The execution methodology of this experimental research work is shown in Figure 3.Figure 2
Types of fibre.Figure 3
Execution methodology of this experimental research work.


## 2. Materials and Methods

Matrix material, one of the reinforcement materials which is used in this experimental work, i.e., polylactic acid (PLA) and nanosilica powder, was purchased from Covai Seenu and Company Ltd, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. The green unit Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India, provides further reinforcing material, i.e., water hyacinth fibres. The nanoparticles known as silicon dioxide, also known as nanosilicas, are the base of a large degree of biomedical research due to their stability, low toxicity, and ability to operate with multiple molecules and polymers. Nanoparticles of silicon dioxide appear in white powder form. The physical properties of these nanoparticles are provided in the table below. Table1 shows the various basic physical, chemical, and thermal properties of nanoparticles with silicon dioxide. P1 consists of pure PLA particulates of 100 wt percent. P2 is made of 80 wt% pure PLA particles, 0 wt% silica powder, and 20 wt% water hyacinth fibre. P3 contains 80 percent wt of pure PLA particles and 20 percent wt of powder of silica and 0 percent wt of powder of water hyacinth. P4 consists of 80% by weight of PLA pure, 2% by weight of silicon powder, and 18% by weight of hyacinth powder. P5 consists of pure PLA particles of 80% wt, silicone powder of 4% wt, and water hyacinth powder of 16% wt. P6 includes 80% wt of pure PLA, 60% wt of silica powder, and 14% wt of powder of hyacinth water. P7 comprises 80 wt% of the pure part of PLA, eight wt% of the silica, and 128 wt% of the water powder hyacinth.Table 1
Physical, chemical, and thermal properties of silica.
Chemical compositionSilica 46.83% and oxygen 53.33%Density2.4 g/cm3Molar mass59.96 g/molMelting point1600°CBoling point2230°CThe particle size of silica obtained at first does not match the size required. To comply with the requirement, silica powder was processed in a ball mill. The measured nano-silica particle diameter in the range of 75 to 100 nm was used as a reinforcement content. Before feeding these mixtures into the double screw extruder machine, PLA particles were heated above the melting temperature. Following heating, the PLA particles were transformed into a liquid stage. The weight percent of enhancement materials, i.e., nanosilica powder and short water hyacinth fibres, was added to liquid state PLA. After 45 minutes of adding filler and refill material to the fluid state PLA matrix, the entire mixture was thoroughly misled in one blender. The composite mix of the array and the reinforcing and the filler materials of smaller pieces (3 cm to 5 cm) in length was prepared by a double screw extruder. Figure4 reveals the double screw extrusion process arrangement.Figure 4
Double screw extrusion process arrangement.The composition of the rectangular bars from well-prepared, hybrid-based composite parts was prepared by a hydraulic injection moulding machine. The combined water hyacinth fibre, PLA, and silica particles had allowed the compression moulding machine to heat up to 100 °C at a specific hydraulic pressure for up to thirty minutes. The required composite plates had been collected and cooled at room temperature after the processing time of 30 minutes. Figure5 reveals the advantages of injection moulding.Figure 5
Advantages of injection moulding.The composite plates were transferred after the cooling process to the water jet machining process, and the necessary composite components were separated from the composite compound according to ASTM standards. For the remaining compositions, the same process was repeated. Figure6 reveals the tensile test sample. Tensile, flexural, and impact tests for establishing the mechanical properties of composites were permitted for the well-prepared composite specimens. The tensile test (ASTMD638), compression test (ASTM-D695 M), and flexural test (ASTMD790-10) of the composites at a load rating of 1 mm/min were used with a computerised 400 kN universal testing machine. Figure 7 reveals the universal testing machine. A Charpy impact test was also performed on the composite impact test specimens in the Impact Testing machine as defined by the ASTM D6110-97 standards. Figure 8 reveals the Impact Testing machine. A water absorption test was also performed in composite specimens of the water absorption test, according to the ASTM D5229 pure water standards. The tensile, compressive, bending, impact, toughness, and water absorption tests were given in different sample dimensions as given in Table 2.Figure 6
Tensile test sample.Figure 7
universal testing machine.Figure 8
Impact Testing machine.Table 2
Composite specimen dimensions for mechanical and water absorption test.
TestDimensions in mm (length-width-thickness)Tensile165 × 12 × 5Compressive150 × 12 × 5Flexural100 × 12 × 5Impact80 × 12 × 5Water absorption100 × 100 × 5The results of mechanical and water absorption tests, such as ultimate tensile strength, flexural strength, flexural strength, impact strength, and water absorption percentage, have been shown in the results and the discussions as a graphical colour plot.


## 3. Results and Discussions

### 3.1. Tensile Test

Figure9 illustrates the tensile strength and tensile behaviour of the water hyacinth reinforced PLA-filled particulate composites containing different ratios of loaded nanosilica and water hyacinth. Without any water hyacinth fibre or nanosilicone (P1 composite), the pure PLA composite showed a tensile strength of 31.45 MPa and the corresponding tensile strain rate was 0.34 percent. During the test, both ends were very strongly fixed on the grips of the universal test machine and the fracture test was performed with the gradual load at the speed of the crosshead to about 1 mm/min. The PLA matrix with 20 wt% nanosilica and 0 wt% water-enhanced fibre composite (P2 composites) had a tensile strength value of 32.95 MPa, and the respective stress rate was 0.35%. With a tensile strength value of 33.68 MPa and a tensile pressure rate of 0.36 percent, the PLA matrix with 0 wt percent nanosilica particles and 20 wt percent hyacinth water fibre enhanced composites (P3 composites).Figure 9
Ultimate tensile strength and strain analysis of composites.After the test, the specimen was broken down at specimen length, and the fibre-pull-out fracture initially burns the load by fibre when it exceeds its load capacity, when the load was transferred to the matrix with the loss of interfacial strength from fibre to the matrix, thus losing the power interface between the fibre and the matrix. The addition of composites of 2 percent nanosilica particles (P4 composites) showed the tensile strength of 34.93 MPa; the tensile strength of the P1, P2, and P3 composites is almost 3.7, 6.09, and 11.06 percent higher. Its corresponding pressure rate was 0.32 percent higher than P1, P2, and P3 composites. The mixed specimens (P5 composites) of 4% nanosilica particles had shown a tensile stress value of 35.67 MPa, nearly 2.11% higher than the mixed specimens of 2% nanosilica (P4 composites). The tensile strength of 6% nanosilica mixed specimens (P6 composites) showed the highest tensile stress rate as 36.93 MPa; the value was nearly 3.5% higher than the 4% nanosilica mixed specimens (P5 composites), and the tensile pressure rate was 0.37%. The tensile strength of the 8% mixed specimens of nanosilica particles (P7 composites) has shown the stress value as 34.61 MPa; this value was almost 6.28% less than the 6% mixed particulate matter (P6 composites) for nanosilica, and the corresponding tensile strain rate was 0.35%. In addition, the 6% nanosilica particles, which had 14% water hyacinth in PLA composite samples, showed the highest pressure value for a tensile of 36.93 MPa, which was almost 12.07 higher than their corresponding strain rate which was respected to 0.39%. Similarly, given the tensile stress value of 4%, the jacinth was as high as the other five combinations, with the exception of P6 composite specimens. It is much higher than the other five. The combined or mixed cumulative tensile strength was also 36.30 MPa of 4% nanosilica particles and 6% water hyacinths higher. The respective strain rate was 0.38%, which was equally higher than all mixed proportions. Compared to the pure PLA composites, this experiment demonstrates the greater strength of the particulate composite. The stress rate also decreases in the case of the particulate addition to the matrix material. The stiffness increases so that the value of the tensile strength rises substantially.


### 3.2. Flexural Test

Figure10 shows the flexural strength conduct of water hyacinth fibre reinforced PLA filling composites of nanosilica particles and water fibre loaded. First, the specimen was placed over two supports in the standard fixture indicated by the standards. Then, using the universal test machine with standard crosshead speed, the centre of the specimen is permitted with the gradual load. With the aid of a digital device and a UTM device, the fracture load was noted.Figure 10
Variations on flexural strength and strain of nanosilica particles filled hybrid composites.As mentioned in the tensile strength analysis, the flexural strain value of 27.12 MPa for PLA pure composites (P1 composite) with a strain rate of 4.9 percent was given in bending strength. With a bending value of 26.72 MPa, the PLA matrix with 20 W/12% nanosilk particles and 0 W/8% water hyacinth fibre reinforced composites had a bending strength value of 4.3%. The PLA matrix had a flexural strength value of 28.97 MPa. The appropriate stress rate was distinguished by 3.2 percent, with 0 wt percent nanosilk particles and 20 wt percent water hyacinth fibre reinforced composite (P3 composites). The added 2 percent of nanosilica particles (P4 composites) showed that they have a Flexural Resistance value of 30.42 MPa; that value was nearly 12.17, 13.85, and 5 percent higher than the composites P1, P2, and P3, and their associated strain rate is 4.4 percent, with a lower rate than the originally clean specimens. The loaded 4 percent (P5 composites) of nanosilica particles also showed a value of 31.82 MPa. That value was significantly higher than the remaining 4,6 percent set of values. The highest flexural strength was 32.53 MPa for 6 percent nanosilica particles (P6 composites) and was almost 19.95, 21.75, 12.30, and 6.98 and 2.23 percent above composites P2, P3, P4, and P5 and its corresponding strain rate is 5.3 percent. The 8% nanosilica composite (P7 composites) nanoparticles have shown a bending strength of 30.11 MPa, a value that was almost 7.44% lower than the P6 composites, and their corresponding stress rate was 4.7%. The values observed were 30.42, 31.82, 32.53, and 30.11 MPa for the 18, 16, 14, and 12 wt percent loaded water hyacinth as the value in nanosilica composites also demonstrated the spike in flexural stress. Whereas the 6% nanosilica particles and 14% hyacinths showed a tremendous increase in bending stress, the observed value is 32,53 MPa with a strain rate of 5.3%. All the observed results have demonstrated that the added particulate matter into the composites significantly increases the flexural stress value. Secondly, incorporating water hyacinth fibres maintains a higher bending strength while adding nanosilica particles to the matrix (6% nanosilica particles), reducing bending stress, and adding hyacinth again (14%) increase strength and further reduce bending stress appropriately.


## 3.1. Tensile Test

Figure9 illustrates the tensile strength and tensile behaviour of the water hyacinth reinforced PLA-filled particulate composites containing different ratios of loaded nanosilica and water hyacinth. Without any water hyacinth fibre or nanosilicone (P1 composite), the pure PLA composite showed a tensile strength of 31.45 MPa and the corresponding tensile strain rate was 0.34 percent. During the test, both ends were very strongly fixed on the grips of the universal test machine and the fracture test was performed with the gradual load at the speed of the crosshead to about 1 mm/min. The PLA matrix with 20 wt% nanosilica and 0 wt% water-enhanced fibre composite (P2 composites) had a tensile strength value of 32.95 MPa, and the respective stress rate was 0.35%. With a tensile strength value of 33.68 MPa and a tensile pressure rate of 0.36 percent, the PLA matrix with 0 wt percent nanosilica particles and 20 wt percent hyacinth water fibre enhanced composites (P3 composites).Figure 9
Ultimate tensile strength and strain analysis of composites.After the test, the specimen was broken down at specimen length, and the fibre-pull-out fracture initially burns the load by fibre when it exceeds its load capacity, when the load was transferred to the matrix with the loss of interfacial strength from fibre to the matrix, thus losing the power interface between the fibre and the matrix. The addition of composites of 2 percent nanosilica particles (P4 composites) showed the tensile strength of 34.93 MPa; the tensile strength of the P1, P2, and P3 composites is almost 3.7, 6.09, and 11.06 percent higher. Its corresponding pressure rate was 0.32 percent higher than P1, P2, and P3 composites. The mixed specimens (P5 composites) of 4% nanosilica particles had shown a tensile stress value of 35.67 MPa, nearly 2.11% higher than the mixed specimens of 2% nanosilica (P4 composites). The tensile strength of 6% nanosilica mixed specimens (P6 composites) showed the highest tensile stress rate as 36.93 MPa; the value was nearly 3.5% higher than the 4% nanosilica mixed specimens (P5 composites), and the tensile pressure rate was 0.37%. The tensile strength of the 8% mixed specimens of nanosilica particles (P7 composites) has shown the stress value as 34.61 MPa; this value was almost 6.28% less than the 6% mixed particulate matter (P6 composites) for nanosilica, and the corresponding tensile strain rate was 0.35%. In addition, the 6% nanosilica particles, which had 14% water hyacinth in PLA composite samples, showed the highest pressure value for a tensile of 36.93 MPa, which was almost 12.07 higher than their corresponding strain rate which was respected to 0.39%. Similarly, given the tensile stress value of 4%, the jacinth was as high as the other five combinations, with the exception of P6 composite specimens. It is much higher than the other five. The combined or mixed cumulative tensile strength was also 36.30 MPa of 4% nanosilica particles and 6% water hyacinths higher. The respective strain rate was 0.38%, which was equally higher than all mixed proportions. Compared to the pure PLA composites, this experiment demonstrates the greater strength of the particulate composite. The stress rate also decreases in the case of the particulate addition to the matrix material. The stiffness increases so that the value of the tensile strength rises substantially.


## 3.2. Flexural Test

Figure10 shows the flexural strength conduct of water hyacinth fibre reinforced PLA filling composites of nanosilica particles and water fibre loaded. First, the specimen was placed over two supports in the standard fixture indicated by the standards. Then, using the universal test machine with standard crosshead speed, the centre of the specimen is permitted with the gradual load. With the aid of a digital device and a UTM device, the fracture load was noted.Figure 10
Variations on flexural strength and strain of nanosilica particles filled hybrid composites.As mentioned in the tensile strength analysis, the flexural strain value of 27.12 MPa for PLA pure composites (P1 composite) with a strain rate of 4.9 percent was given in bending strength. With a bending value of 26.72 MPa, the PLA matrix with 20 W/12% nanosilk particles and 0 W/8% water hyacinth fibre reinforced composites had a bending strength value of 4.3%. The PLA matrix had a flexural strength value of 28.97 MPa. The appropriate stress rate was distinguished by 3.2 percent, with 0 wt percent nanosilk particles and 20 wt percent water hyacinth fibre reinforced composite (P3 composites). The added 2 percent of nanosilica particles (P4 composites) showed that they have a Flexural Resistance value of 30.42 MPa; that value was nearly 12.17, 13.85, and 5 percent higher than the composites P1, P2, and P3, and their associated strain rate is 4.4 percent, with a lower rate than the originally clean specimens. The loaded 4 percent (P5 composites) of nanosilica particles also showed a value of 31.82 MPa. That value was significantly higher than the remaining 4,6 percent set of values. The highest flexural strength was 32.53 MPa for 6 percent nanosilica particles (P6 composites) and was almost 19.95, 21.75, 12.30, and 6.98 and 2.23 percent above composites P2, P3, P4, and P5 and its corresponding strain rate is 5.3 percent. The 8% nanosilica composite (P7 composites) nanoparticles have shown a bending strength of 30.11 MPa, a value that was almost 7.44% lower than the P6 composites, and their corresponding stress rate was 4.7%. The values observed were 30.42, 31.82, 32.53, and 30.11 MPa for the 18, 16, 14, and 12 wt percent loaded water hyacinth as the value in nanosilica composites also demonstrated the spike in flexural stress. Whereas the 6% nanosilica particles and 14% hyacinths showed a tremendous increase in bending stress, the observed value is 32,53 MPa with a strain rate of 5.3%. All the observed results have demonstrated that the added particulate matter into the composites significantly increases the flexural stress value. Secondly, incorporating water hyacinth fibres maintains a higher bending strength while adding nanosilica particles to the matrix (6% nanosilica particles), reducing bending stress, and adding hyacinth again (14%) increase strength and further reduce bending stress appropriately.


## 4. Charpy

### 4.1. Impact Test

The impact strength of composites examined by the Charpy impact test is shown in Figure11. The results demonstrated an additional 160.39, 46.21, 64.95, 24.77, and 10.88 percent in composites P2, P3, P4, and P5, respectively, and 6 wt percent of nanosilica particles in the composite P6. This is due to the fillers used by silica particles, which strengthened the PLA matrix less than 56 nm in the particle stage. The microparticle fillers (silica particles) helped increase the surface-to-volume ratio by providing a larger surface area. Thus, the stress transfer between the filler matrix was increased. In addition, the fillers showed good interfacial adhesion in the polymer matrix, which helped to increase stress transfer between the filler and the matrix.Figure 11
The impact energy of nanosilica particles filled hybrid composites.Composite P6, compared with P1 composite ES, had a higher impact strength due to the presence of water hyacinth fibre and nanosilica particles that allowed greater power absorption in the event of an impact. Made of water hyacinth and nano silica are composites P4, P5, P6, and P7. The results enhance the impact strength of PLA from P4 to P6 composites. Compared to all other composites, pure PLA (P1 composites) also provided a small impact strength (P2 to P7). The highest impact strength of composite P6 was 9.27 kJ/m2, improving by 160.4% compared to pure PLA, because the water hyacinth and nanosilica continuous fibre provide additional energy absorption at impact. However, with the performance of the composite P2, impact to composites P3 to P7 was the lowest. The lack of water hyacinth fibre probably resulted. The result agreed with the finding from earlier studies of the subsequently reduced interaction among the fibres and the matrix by the formation of a crack and byproducts resulting from the reaction of nanosilica particles. Finally, because of the absence of reinforcement and filling materials in the PLA matrix, the impact properties of the composite material were reduced.


### 4.2. Rockwell Hardness

Hardness is a feature that measures the surface indentation and abrasion resistance of the material. Hardness is also a critical parameter that indicates the composite’s durability and life span. The hardness of the various composition composites and PLA composite specimens is shown in Figure12. All the composites produced were highly harder than the clean epoxy. This increased hardness was associated with the high rigidity and hardness of the distended stage parts, which can be reinforced due to their load carrying capacity. The results indicate that adding 6 wt% of nanosilica particles in the P6 composite improves hardness by 55.88, 43.24, 51.43, 17.78, and 8.16 percent, in P1, P2, P3, P4, and P5.Figure 12
Rockwell hardness (HRC) values of the pure PLA and hybrid composite samples.The plot observed that P6 composites have the highest hardness, 56% better than pure PLA composites (P1 composites). However, the hardness of a composite depends on the homogenous distribution of the reinforced particles and fibre into the matrix. Due to the increasing hardness of this composite, the silica content and water hyacinth fibres are increased by 6 wt%, but the loading of the particles increases slightly and gradually. The increase of the hardness value at lower particles charging can be attributed to the homogenous distribution of silica particles and water hyacinth fibre within the matrix, with a depreciation of the vacuums and a stronger interfacial adhesion between the matrix and the particles. It is worth noting that while silica has reduced the composition’s tensile strength, it has increased the PLA matrix’s hardness. The loading conditions are different. The low interfacial adhesion between both the tensile cargo conditions tends to cause the silica particles to debond from the PLA matrix. In the case of a hardness test, the composite is loaded vertically and downwards. This causes silica particles to be firmly pressed into the matrix. The pressure action causes a smooth transfer, although their interfacial adhesion has been poor, of the load from the matrix to the silica and water hyacinth. All of these lead to better composite hardness.


### 4.3. Water Absorption Properties

The durability of the water hyacinth fibre reinforced nanosilica particles filled PLA matrix biocomposites can be predicted through the water absorption tests. The weight of each specimen was measured before this test. Weight measured composite specimens are then immersed in normal water for 72 hours (three days). After this duration, the immersed specimens are taken away from the water container for the weight measuring purpose. Based on the weight of the specimen after the test, the percentage of water absorption has been calculated. The water absorption test results are illustrated in Figure13 for all composite specimens.Figure 13
Water absorption test results of the composite specimens.The percentage of water absorption has been calculated for all composites (P1 to P7 composite specimens) with a magnitude of 4.89, 3.48, 4.73, 4.51, 3.91, 2.67, and 3.12%, respectively. The maximum weight gained by the composite specimens after the water absorption test was found in pure PLA composites (P1 composites). The minimum weight gained by the composite specimens after the water absorption test was found in 6% nanosilica particles filled composites (P6 composites). The percentage of the water absorption has found a very lesser amount at 6% nanosilica particles weight percentage added to the composites. The maximum percentage of water absorption (4.89%) has been found at composites without the nanosilica particles and water hyacinth particles. The water absorption of the specimens has significantly reduced to increasing weight percentages of the nanosilica particles, which are added to the water hyacinth fibre PLA composites. Superior water absorption behaviour, due to removal of lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose in the water hyacinth fibre, has been found in 14 wt% water hyacinth fibre enhanced composite specimens, and spaces may be made in the water hyacinth fibre molecules. The addition of limited filler content (6 wt percent), i.e., nanosilica particles in water hyacinth fibre voids, has been filled in and enhances the good quantity of water interface between water hyacinth fluid and PLA matrix.


## 4.1. Impact Test

The impact strength of composites examined by the Charpy impact test is shown in Figure11. The results demonstrated an additional 160.39, 46.21, 64.95, 24.77, and 10.88 percent in composites P2, P3, P4, and P5, respectively, and 6 wt percent of nanosilica particles in the composite P6. This is due to the fillers used by silica particles, which strengthened the PLA matrix less than 56 nm in the particle stage. The microparticle fillers (silica particles) helped increase the surface-to-volume ratio by providing a larger surface area. Thus, the stress transfer between the filler matrix was increased. In addition, the fillers showed good interfacial adhesion in the polymer matrix, which helped to increase stress transfer between the filler and the matrix.Figure 11
The impact energy of nanosilica particles filled hybrid composites.Composite P6, compared with P1 composite ES, had a higher impact strength due to the presence of water hyacinth fibre and nanosilica particles that allowed greater power absorption in the event of an impact. Made of water hyacinth and nano silica are composites P4, P5, P6, and P7. The results enhance the impact strength of PLA from P4 to P6 composites. Compared to all other composites, pure PLA (P1 composites) also provided a small impact strength (P2 to P7). The highest impact strength of composite P6 was 9.27 kJ/m2, improving by 160.4% compared to pure PLA, because the water hyacinth and nanosilica continuous fibre provide additional energy absorption at impact. However, with the performance of the composite P2, impact to composites P3 to P7 was the lowest. The lack of water hyacinth fibre probably resulted. The result agreed with the finding from earlier studies of the subsequently reduced interaction among the fibres and the matrix by the formation of a crack and byproducts resulting from the reaction of nanosilica particles. Finally, because of the absence of reinforcement and filling materials in the PLA matrix, the impact properties of the composite material were reduced.


## 4.2. Rockwell Hardness

Hardness is a feature that measures the surface indentation and abrasion resistance of the material. Hardness is also a critical parameter that indicates the composite’s durability and life span. The hardness of the various composition composites and PLA composite specimens is shown in Figure12. All the composites produced were highly harder than the clean epoxy. This increased hardness was associated with the high rigidity and hardness of the distended stage parts, which can be reinforced due to their load carrying capacity. The results indicate that adding 6 wt% of nanosilica particles in the P6 composite improves hardness by 55.88, 43.24, 51.43, 17.78, and 8.16 percent, in P1, P2, P3, P4, and P5.Figure 12
Rockwell hardness (HRC) values of the pure PLA and hybrid composite samples.The plot observed that P6 composites have the highest hardness, 56% better than pure PLA composites (P1 composites). However, the hardness of a composite depends on the homogenous distribution of the reinforced particles and fibre into the matrix. Due to the increasing hardness of this composite, the silica content and water hyacinth fibres are increased by 6 wt%, but the loading of the particles increases slightly and gradually. The increase of the hardness value at lower particles charging can be attributed to the homogenous distribution of silica particles and water hyacinth fibre within the matrix, with a depreciation of the vacuums and a stronger interfacial adhesion between the matrix and the particles. It is worth noting that while silica has reduced the composition’s tensile strength, it has increased the PLA matrix’s hardness. The loading conditions are different. The low interfacial adhesion between both the tensile cargo conditions tends to cause the silica particles to debond from the PLA matrix. In the case of a hardness test, the composite is loaded vertically and downwards. This causes silica particles to be firmly pressed into the matrix. The pressure action causes a smooth transfer, although their interfacial adhesion has been poor, of the load from the matrix to the silica and water hyacinth. All of these lead to better composite hardness.


## 4.3. Water Absorption Properties

The durability of the water hyacinth fibre reinforced nanosilica particles filled PLA matrix biocomposites can be predicted through the water absorption tests. The weight of each specimen was measured before this test. Weight measured composite specimens are then immersed in normal water for 72 hours (three days). After this duration, the immersed specimens are taken away from the water container for the weight measuring purpose. Based on the weight of the specimen after the test, the percentage of water absorption has been calculated. The water absorption test results are illustrated in Figure13 for all composite specimens.Figure 13
Water absorption test results of the composite specimens.The percentage of water absorption has been calculated for all composites (P1 to P7 composite specimens) with a magnitude of 4.89, 3.48, 4.73, 4.51, 3.91, 2.67, and 3.12%, respectively. The maximum weight gained by the composite specimens after the water absorption test was found in pure PLA composites (P1 composites). The minimum weight gained by the composite specimens after the water absorption test was found in 6% nanosilica particles filled composites (P6 composites). The percentage of the water absorption has found a very lesser amount at 6% nanosilica particles weight percentage added to the composites. The maximum percentage of water absorption (4.89%) has been found at composites without the nanosilica particles and water hyacinth particles. The water absorption of the specimens has significantly reduced to increasing weight percentages of the nanosilica particles, which are added to the water hyacinth fibre PLA composites. Superior water absorption behaviour, due to removal of lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose in the water hyacinth fibre, has been found in 14 wt% water hyacinth fibre enhanced composite specimens, and spaces may be made in the water hyacinth fibre molecules. The addition of limited filler content (6 wt percent), i.e., nanosilica particles in water hyacinth fibre voids, has been filled in and enhances the good quantity of water interface between water hyacinth fluid and PLA matrix.


## 5. Conclusions

Mechanical tests were carried out on the water hyacinth fibre which enhanced PLA matrix composites, nanosilica particles, and water hyacinth particulate matter. After the standard tests, the following observations are noted.(1)
The water hyacinth fibre enhanced epoxy composite is successfully produced by loading nanosilica particles with various proportions of hyacinth fibre particles.(2)
Tests such as tensile, bending, impact, hardness, and water absorption are conducted in different proportions. Based on tests, nanosilica particles and water hyacinth particles increase the specimens strengths considerably.(3)
The combinations of the two particles (6% nanosilica and 14% water hyacinth) nevertheless demonstrated their extraordinary efficiency in every test.(4)
It is suggested that both water hyacinth fibre and nanosilica particles reinforced PLA hybrid composites can be used as an alternate material for materials reinforced with natural fibre.(5)
Moreover, the most valuable aspect of this research is that water hyacinth, which is considered a waste and environmental pollutant, makes products that may replace high-cost glass fibre-based composites and help grow a healthier aquatic environment for the fishes and other aquatic plants.



---

*Source: 4933450-2021-12-06.xml*