# A Compact Dual-Band Metasurface-Based Antenna for Wearable Medical Body-Area Network Devices

Authors: Guangchen Mu; Pengshan Ren
Journal: Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

A compact, low-profile wearable antenna capable of operation within the 5.1–5.46 GHz and 5.7–5.85 GHz medical body-area network band is suggested to make the antenna better for wearable devices. The integrated metasurface (MSs) antenna consists of as few as array of three wan-shaped components, directly below the planar waveguide-fed monopole antenna. The measurement of the integrated antenna is0.56λ0×0.56λ0×0.08λ0, all while achieving an average gain of 8.2 dBi in working frequency and a front-to-back ratio (FB) in excess of 19 dB. As demonstrated by in-depth examination, the antenna performs exceptionally well in withstanding the distortion of structure, far superior to planar monopole antenna. Additionally, the metasurface enables the specific absorption rate (SAR) low to 0.84 W/kg, which makes this type of antenna suited to application in different wearable devices.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

There is a growing focus on issues like fitness monitor for the old patients with persistent illness, patient tracking and healthcare, and significant increase in Wireless Body-Area Network (WBAN) applications [1–3]. Metamaterials are variety of man-made composite substance, possessing extraordinary characteristics not achievable in a natural state. Metamaterials are expanded by arranging electrically small scatterers into two dimensions, given the name metasurface (MSs) [4]. Metasurfaces have advantages such as low-profile, low loss, easy to design. Attention of relevant research scholars internal and abroad is received. Several important applications are widely used, including polarization control, surface wave couplers, and antenna reflector [5–7].For the best performance of wearable devices, the antennas used in WBAN require being compact, flexible, lightweight, and preferably comfortable to wear. Initially, some scholars proposed that microstrip antennas and cavity-backed slot antennas are enabled for the purpose of wearing, but failed to display desirable properties with body [8, 9]. Meanwhile, the inverted-F antenna has been investigated for on-body communications; nevertheless, a considerable amount of energy is absorbed by human tissues because of the inverted-F antenna almost-omnidirectional radiation performance [10]. With the increasing attention paid to MSs, the unique properties of MSs can not only improve the radiation characteristics of the monopole, but also effectively reduce the harm to the human body that is found. Consequently, the metasurfaces are suitable for the wearable antenna systems that people can wear. In 2009, a double-band patch antenna containing (electromagnetic band gap) EBG structures is designed [11]. Structurally, the antenna is comprised of ordinary clothes and works at 2.45 GHz and 5 GHz wireless bands. The EBG structures can increase the positive gain and reduce the coupling between antenna and human body. Subsequently, a flexible dual frequency antenna with MSs is proposed [12]. In order to make the antenna thin and flexible, the substrate is made of polyimide, and thickness of 0.05 mm significantly lowers the overall size of the antenna. In 2012, a wearable antenna with nanosilver ink printed EBG array on photo paper working at the frequency 2.4–2.5 GHz is designed [13]. Afterwards, this design is further optimized [14]. It is only with a 2 × 1 array of EBG structures but still working at the ISM band. In 2014, a comfortable dual-band antenna with Artificial Magnetic Conductor (AMC) for WBAN is proposed [15]. The radiation characteristics are improved compared to traditional monopole antennas. In 2016, an antenna with JC structure metasurfaces working in the wireless WLAN band of 5.15–5.25 GHz and 5.72–5.82 GHz is presented [16]. The MSs is isolated of not only the ground but also the main radiator, which greatly reduces the specific absorption rate (SAR). Meanwhile, a wideband antenna with interdigitated MSs is proposed [17]. Finally, the antenna achieves an impedance bandwidth of 10% and a gain greater than 6.67 dBi, and the working principle of the antenna through dispersion analysis is explained. In 2017, a wearable antenna with a novel miniaturized EBG structure at 2.4 GHz is presented [18]. The EBG structure greatly reduces the impact of the antenna due to high loss of the human body and finally results in gain enhancement of 7.8 dBi and SAR reduction of more than 95%. The same year, a MSs antenna for wireless applications is put forward [19]. The MSs improves the bandwidth and gain of patch antennas. Meanwhile, a wireless power transfer (WPT) system integrating with MSs is designed [20]. After integrating with MSs, the efficiency of the WPT system has a great improvement. Compared with the original WPT system, magnetic coupling resonance intensity can be increased by 15.7 dB. In 2018, a coplanar wave guide fed elastic monopole is proposed [21]. Its bandwidths are 1.5–3.0 GHz and 4.5–6.5 GHz. The EBG structure can be used to achieve low SAR. In 2019, a textile antenna integrated with AMC is designed [22]. Compared with the traditional monopole antenna, the proposed integrated antenna has better performance in structural deformation and human body loading.Herein, a low-profile printed monopole integrated antenna based on a wan-type structure metasurfaces is proposed. The antenna operating frequency band conforms to IEEE802.11a. The integrated antenna proposed in this paper is designed by using the in-phase reflection characteristics of AMC which importantly improves the front-to-back (FB) ratio and accordingly lowers SAR. Furthermore, the designed antenna has the advantages of flexibility and low-profile which makes it suitable for wearable devices.Table1 shows the comparison between the proposed antenna and the work reported in the literature, including antenna volume, bandwidth, gain, and SAR. It can be seen from Table 1 that the antenna designed in the operating frequency band has a relatively high gain. In addition, in order to design antennas suitable for wearable equipment, flexible materials are mainly used as substrate. At present, flexible material technology is difficult to achieve, popularized, or expensive. Therefore, it is important to study how to use conventional substrate materials to design antennas that meet the performance of wearable devices and have a bendable profile.Table 1
Comparison of the proposed integrated antenna with previous works.
Ref.Volume (mm3)B.W (GHz)Gain (dBi)Material[22]102 × 68 × 3.64.3–5.96.12Pellon[19]38 × 50 × 3.0485.64–5.85.8RO43502.4–2.5111.8[15]102 × 102 × 3.755.71–5.858Vinyl[17]62.4 × 33 × 4.53.63–4.236.67–7.94RO30035.1–5.35Proposed43.2 × 43.2 × 4.65.725–5.858.2RO4003


## 2. Design of Dual-Band Integrated Antenna

The integrated MSs antenna involves two components: the top is a planar monopole and the bottom is 3 × 3 wan-shaped MSs. The design is shown in Figure1. The top antenna is fed by coplanar waveguide (CPW) for printing in upper surface of the RO4003 substrate, its relative dielectric constant is 3.38, loss tangent is 0.0027, and the thick is d = 0.3 mm, length is b = 32 mm, and width is a = 23.4 mm. The CPW size is b3 = 5.5 mm and a4 = 11.2 mm. The dimensions are a1 = 6 mm, b1 = 18 mm, and a3 = 1.4 mm. The MSs structure is located directly below the monopole antenna and its overall size is 43.2 × 43.2 mm2. The coupling between the antenna and the MSs can be regulated through adjusting the clearance among the two structures and finally adjusting the interval d1 = 4 mm. The MSs is composed of 3 × 3 wan-shaped cell and is covered with copper at the bottom. Wan-type size is w1 = 6.8 mm, w2 = 13.4 mm, w3 = 2.9 mm, and g1 = 0.6 mm, and interval in the two-unit cell is g = 1 mm. The geometric layout of the suggested antenna is depicted in Figure 1.Figure 1
Configuration of the integrated planar antenna.At Step 1 of the layouts, the sizes of the anisotropic MSs are designed. Figure2(b) is the equivalent circuit of the MSs unit, and its resonance frequency f is [14](1)f=12πLs+LdCs,where Ls is the equivalent inductance of the patch, Cs is the series surface electric capacity resulting from the clearance among the component structures, and Ld indicates the equivalent inductance of the substrate and its fully connected ground on the back, largely affected by the dielectric constant and the thick of the substrate. The change of the size will cause the change of the resonant frequency band of the MSs accordingly. Figure 2(a) shows the MSs unit structure model, the unit size is l1 = 14.4 mm, and the remaining sizes are given in Figure 1. The wan-type unit is placed in an air box, and the surroundings are, respectively, set as master-slave boundaries to simulate the periodic MSs structure. The upper surface of the air is set as a floquet port, so that the incident wave enters the unit vertically from the upper surface in the negative z direction. Based on this simulation, the reflection phase result of the periodic structure can be obtained. Therefore, the size is finally determined through HFSS simulation optimization, and the corresponding reflection phase results are shown in Figure 2(c). It can be seen that the frequency band corresponding to the reflection phase in the range of -90 ± 45° satisfies the target frequency band of the antenna operation, namely, 5.1–5.46 GHz and 5.7–5.85 GHz [16].Figure 2
(a) Wan-type metasurface unit structure; (b) equivalent circuit; and (c) reflection phase of unit.
(a)(b)(c)


## 3. Results and Discussion

According to the antenna design, S11 can be finally got as shown in Figure 3(a). Moreover, the suggested antenna is processed by PCB process, and the measurement result is also shown in Figure 3(a). It shows that the suggested antenna obtains good impedance in 5.1–5.46 GHz and 5.7–5.85 GHz, and the frequency band satisfies IEEE 802.11a. Meanwhile, using the E8362B network analyzer shows that the measurement result at 5.2 GHz has the lowest return loss of −25 dB compared with the simulation result, and the operating bandwidth is almost identical. The measurement result at 5.8 GHz has wider operating bandwidth than the simulation result, which is most likely due to error within the manufacturing tolerances and measurement system. The gap d1 between the monopole and the MSs is insulated by a thin foam when measuring. Figure 3(b) illustrates the measurement and simulation outcomes of voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR). The VSWR of the antenna is basically less than 1.5 within the operating frequency, which satisfies the requirements of the technical indicators.Figure 3
Simulated and measured (a) S11 and (b) VSWR.
(a)(b)The suggested E- and H-plane gain total radiation patterns are presented in Figure4. For comparison, the single monopole pattern is illustrated in this diagram as well. Evidently, the monopole has the radiation feature of the dipole in the E-plane and the omnidirectional radiation character shown in the H-plane. Conversely, radiation is noticeably improved with MSs, and integrated antennas have strong directional radiation properties with a half power beamwidth (HPBW) of roughly 65° and 72° at 5.2 GHz, 60° and 70° at 5.8 GHz for E- and H-plan separately.Figure 4
E- and H-plane gain total radiation patterns at working frequency.
(a)(b)For comprehension of the radiating mechanisation of this integrated MSs antenna, simulation reveals the surface current in Figure5 at frequency bands of interest 5.2 GHz and 5.8 GHz. For the monopole, the surface current concentrated at feeder and patch connections is at all the lower and upper frequency bands. However, the surface current is primarily concentrated on the monopole and wan-shaped MSs below it at 5.2 GHz and 5.8 GHz for the integrated antenna. It shows that when using MSs as the reflector of the antenna, it is still effectual even the two are very close. Meanwhile, the wan-shaped MSs proposed in the paper design acts as the primary radiator. Even more, radiation characteristics of integrated antenna result in a significantly higher FB.Figure 5
Surface current of the monopole and the integrated MSs antenna at working frequency.To validate it, the gain and FB are calculated as shown in Figure6. The monopole has a gain of roughly 2 dBi while the integrated MSs antenna has 8.2 dBi and 8.4 dBi at working frequency, as Figure 6(a) illustrates. In comparison, the integrated MSs antenna shows a FB of around 19 dB, as indicated in Figure 6(b). This value is significantly greater compared to the monopole. It implies that only a low amount of energy is radiated into people after being placed on the body [7]. These properties are conducive to reducing the SAR value to the minimum and improving the robustness of antenna to people, which ensures suitability for the purpose of wearing.Figure 6
Gain and FB of the monopole and the integrated MSs antenna.
(a)(b)In order to protect the human body from harmful radiation, the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) has set out relevant regulatory requirements. According to the regulation, the maximum SAR of 10 g of tissue must not exceed 2 W/kg. The Federal Communications Commission stipulates that the average SAR of a 1 g organization must be no greater than 1.6 W/kg. The equation indicates that the SAR value is associated with the used input power [3]:(2)SAR=σE2ρ,where σ indicates the electrical conductivity for the tissue in S/m, E denotes the electric field in V/m, and ρ refers to the mass density of the tissue in kg/m3. As a benchmark, a 100 mW power accepted is chosen to evaluate the SAR performance of the proposed integrated antenna.Figure7 presents the result of SAR values of 1 g and 10 g tissues at 5.2 GHz and 5.8 GHz frequencies. Figure 7(a) represents the SAR value of 1 g tissue at 5.2 GHz, and the maximum value is 1.5 W/kg; Figure 7(b) shows the result of the SAR value of 1 g tissue at 5.8 GHz, where the maximum value is 1.6 W/kg. Obviously, the SAR results are in accordance with international regulations for 1 g of tissue at both frequencies. Figures 7(c) and 7(d) show the SAR of 10 g tissue at 5.2 GHz and 5.8 GHz; the maximum values are 0.84 W/kg and 0.56 W/kg, respectively, clearly also in accordance with international regulations. The above shows that the SAR must be within the safety limits before using the antenna in WBAN.Figure 7
SAR values distribution (a) and (c) at 5.2 GHz and (b) and (d) at 5.8 GHz. (a) and (b) 1 g of tissue. (c) and (d) 10 g of tissue.
(a)(b)(c)(d)In many applications, the antenna is anticipated to be subject to bending throughout working. Figures8(a) and 8(b) illustrate the model when the bending radius Ra is 40 mm and 70 mm, separately. Figures 9(a) and 9(b) represent the results of S11 and gain of the antenna with varying bending Ra, separately. Figure 9(a) demonstrates that the antenna is moved to the blue in low-frequency stage while Ra = 40 mm, and there is almost no change in the high-frequency band. While Ra = 70 mm, the antenna moved to the red at around 5.2 GHz, and the high-frequency section remains unchanged broadly. To sum up, even if the antenna is bent, it still operates in the IEEE.802.11a standard frequency channel and fully meets the 20 M bandwidth. For gain, the designed antenna has a gain reduction of about 1 dBi at 5.2 GHz and remains basically unchanged at 5.8 GHz when Ra goes from 70 mm to 40 mm.Figure 8
Structure deformation integrated MSs antenna with varying values of radius: (a) Ra = 40 mm and (b) Ra = 70 mm.
(a)(b)Figure 9
Structure deformation integrated MSs antenna: (a) S11 and (b) Gain.
(a)(b)Figure10 shows the measured S11 when the integrated antenna is placed on the human body, and the simulation results are also included for comparison. When placed on the tissues, the working frequency band is 5.17–5.3 GHz and 5.715–5.94 GHz. Obviously, the simulation result is slightly different from the measurement, which may be caused by the measurement error and the influence of the human body conductor.Figure 10
S11 of the integrated MSs antenna at human tissues.Figure11 represents the antenna E- and H-plane gain total radiation pattern at 5.2 GHz and 5.8 GHz in differing circumstances of bending, respectively. The figure reveals that the bending of the integrated MSs antenna is barely impactful on the radiation. It is indicated that the proposed antenna indeed has a little influence on the property caused by bending.Figure 11
E- and H-plane gain total radiation patterns of structurally deformable wearable antenna: (a) 5.2 GHz and (b) 5.8 GHz.
(a)(b)


## 4. Conclusion

In the study, a compact, low-profile conformal antenna with a wan-type MSs can be used in WBAN. By optimizing the MSs structure and monopole antenna by HFSS, the impedance bandwidth of 5.1–5.46 GHz and 5.7–5.85 GHz is realized, and the gain is in excess of 8dBi, and due to the fact that the thick of substrate used in the design is only 0.3 mm, the antenna has bendable properties. Meanwhile, a lower SAR and a higher FB of about 18 dB indicate that massive energy will not be radiated into people when placed near the body. The outcomes of S11, gain, and antenna pattern of the integrated MSs antenna after conformation further show the potential of the antenna for WBAN. In addition, the measured results are consistent with the simulation results. In conclusion, the suggested low-profile conformal antenna can become a diamond in the rough for WBAN as far as SAR, bandwidth, radiation direction.



---

*Source: 4967198-2020-08-01.xml*