# Bio-Based Polyols from Seed Oils for Water-Blown Rigid Polyurethane Foam Preparation

Authors: Paweena Ekkaphan; Sarintip Sooksai; Nuanphun Chantarasiri; Amorn Petsom
Journal: International Journal of Polymer Science
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

The preparation of water-blown rigid polyurethane (RPUR) foams using bio-based polyols from sesame seed oil and pumpkin seed oil has been reported. Polyols synthesis involved two steps, namely, hydroxylation and alcoholysis reaction. FTIR, NMR, and ESI-MS were used to monitor the process of the synthesized polyols and their physicochemical properties were determined. The resulting polyols have OH number in the range of 340–351 mg KOH/g. RPUR foams blown with water were produced from the reaction of biopolyols with commercial polymeric methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (PMDI). The proper PUR formulations can be manipulated to produce the desired material applications. These seed oil-based RPUR foams exhibited relatively high compressive strength (237.7–240.2 kPa) with the density in the range of 40–45 kg/m3. Additionally, the cell foam morphology investigated by scanning electron microscope indicated that their cellular structure presented mostly polygonal closed cells. The experimental results demonstrate that these bio-based polyols can be used as an alternative starting material for RPUR production.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Polyurethane (PUR) foams are produced based on the basis of exothermic addition polymerization between two or more isocyanate groups and polyhydroxy compounds (polyols) to form urethane linkage. This reaction will occur under room temperature by adding a small amount of suitable catalysts such as tertiary amine and tin compounds. The cell structure of foam is formed by stabilizing gas bubble generation in polymer matrix. Hence, the blowing agent and silicone surfactant are essentially required [1]. Within this requirement, water is used as a blowing agent for many researches and industrial processes and carbon dioxide gas evolves out via the highly exothermic reaction between water and isocyanates [2]. Based on the simple basic chemistry and processing of PUR foams, the world of PUR foam production is recently increasing with the versatile applications especially in automotive industry, footwear, furnishing, packaging, insulation, construction, and so forth. The wide variety of PUR foam grades can be manufactured by modifying and controlling the nature of the main starting components (isocyanates and polyols) and the properties of end used products [1].Commercially, both starting materials for PUR production are mainly derived from petrochemical precursors which are exhausted rapidly and are not in consonance with environmental friendly requirements. In seeking for an alternative renewable resource, plant oils are available in abundance with cost effectiveness and have the potential to replace the petroleum based PUR. Vegetable oils are reactive triglyceride molecules containing a variation of fatty acids proportion which can be modified by chemical reaction to obtain polyalcohol compounds. Recently, the ongoing use of plant oils for polyols synthesis has been intensively investigated by many researchers. Although seed oils from agricultural harvests including castor oil, soybean oil, linseed oil, canola oil, rapeseed oil, and palm oil are widely used as the raw materials for polyols production, new alternative feedstock has been progressively discovered and developed [3–7]. In this study, the utilization of highly polyunsaturated seed oils, namely, sesame seed oil and pumpkin seed oil, was investigated.From the literature reviews, there are several methods to synthesize bio-based polyols from vegetable oils [8–11]. The conventional chemical methodology for the functionality of unsaturated moieties to produce OH groups is the most operational such asin situ epoxidation-hydroxylation at the double bonds with percarboxylic acids to obtain mostly secondary OH groups with low hydroxyl number [12, 13], the hydroformylation with syngas (H2/CO) in the presence of transition metal catalysts following the hydrogenation of resulting aldehydes to form primary OH groups [14, 15], and the ozonolysis of triglycerides forming aldehydes and subsequent reduction to primary OH groups [16, 17]. In addition to the well-known alcoholysis of vegetable oils with polyfunctional alcohols in the presence of acidic or basic catalysts which has been reported, the resulting products are the mixture of fatty acid alkyl esters [18–22]. Among the variety of chemical modifications of seed oils, thein situ epoxidation-hydroxylation and alcoholysis reaction is used for the preparation of bio-based polyols in this work, due to its industrial applicability and low cost.As mentioned before, the objective of this work is to synthesize bio-based polyols from sesame seed oil and pumpkin seed oil using a two-step reaction. Firstly, hydroxylation reaction of seed oil occurred under excess performic acid condition and then the alcoholysis of hydroxylated seed oils with triethanolamine in the presence of lithium hydroxide as a catalyst was carried out. The second purpose is the preparation of water-blown RPUR foams using these bio-based polyols reacting with the polymeric methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (PMDI) in the presence ofN,N-dimethylcyclohexylamine (DMCHA) as catalyst and silicone surfactant. Furthermore, the mechanical and thermal properties of optimized bio-based foams were determined.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

Sesame seed oil and pumpkin seed oil were provided by the Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Chulalongkorn University. Their characteristics and fatty acid profile are illustrated in Table1. Hydrogen peroxide (30 wt%) from Merck, formic acid (98 wt%) from Fisher Scientific, triethanolamine (85 wt%) from Ajax Finechem, and lithium hydroxide (99 wt%) from Fluka were used for polyols preparation.Table 1
Characteristics and fatty acid composition of sesame seed oil and pumpkin seed oil.
Sesame seed oil Pumpkin seed oil Color (naked eyes) Light brown Dark green Viscosity (at 25°C, cps) 136 ± 3 160 ± 6 Acid value (mg KOH/g) 7.23 ± 0.18 2.13 ± 0.14 Water content (wt%) 0.08 0.09  Fatty acid  (FA) profile (wt%) Palmitic acid (C16:0) 11.40 13.04 Stearic acid (C18:0) 4.30 4.60 Oleic acid (C18:1) 37.00 34.82 Linoleic acid (C18:2) 47.30 47.55 Total unsaturated FAs 84.30 82.37For the preparation of water-blown RPUR foams, the isocyanate Suprasec® 5005 (polymeric methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (PMDI); NCO content = 31.0 wt%; average functionality = 2.7), the commercial polyether polyol Raypol 4218 (OH number = 438 mg KOH/g), the polyether dimethyl siloxane surfactant TEGOSTAB® B8460, and the foaming catalyst DMCHA (N,N-dimethylcyclohexylamine) were supplied from Huntsman (Thailand) Co., Ltd. and IRPC Public Co., Ltd.


### 2.2. Synthesis of Seed Oil-Based Polyols

#### 2.2.1. Hydroxylation of Seed Oils

A portion of 30 wt% of hydrogen peroxide (0.27 mol, 27.60 mL) and 98 wt% of formic acid (0.54 mol, 20.80 mL) were mixed in a three-neck round bottom flask equipped with a stirrer, reflux condenser, and a thermometer. The mixture was heated to 40°C with constant stirring. Then the vegetable oil (0.18 mol, 50.00 g) was added dropwise and the temperature was kept at 40–50°C for 3 hours. After that, the reaction mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature. The liquid separated clearly into two layers. The bottom layer was removed, and the hydroxylated oil in the upper layer was recovered and distilled under vacuum to eliminate the remaining water and acid. The hydroxylated sesame seed oil was light pale yellow viscous liquid, whereas the hydroxylated pumpkin seed oil was dark green liquid.


#### 2.2.2. Alcoholysis of Hydroxylated Seed Oils

The hydroxylated vegetable oil (1 mol, 50.00 g), 85 wt% of triethanolamine (3 mol, 30.17 g), and lithium hydroxide (0.2 wt% of total weight, 0.16 g) were mixed together in a flask with mechanical stirrer and thermometer. The reaction mixture was constantly stirred as the temperature was raised to 150°C in 0.5 hours. The reaction was continued at this temperature for 2.5 hours. The obtained polyols were dark pale yellow liquid with high viscosity. The resulting polyols were used without further purification.


### 2.3. Polyols Characterization

#### 2.3.1. Hydroxyl Number

OH numbers of seed oil-based polyols were determined according to ASTM D4274-11, test method D-reflux phthalation [23].


#### 2.3.2. Acid Number

The acid number of polyols was evaluated following ASTM D4662-08 [24].


#### 2.3.3. Water Content

The water content of polyols is defined as the water concentration (mg/kg or percentage) contained in the synthesized polyols which could be determined using a Metrohm 831 KF coulometer with 703 Ti stand. The coulometric Karl Fischer titration procedure was performed according to ASTM D6304-07, procedure C-water evaporator accessory [25].


#### 2.3.4. Viscosity Measurement

The dynamic viscosity of synthesized polyols was determined using a digital VR 3000 MYR viscometer at25±0.1°C.


#### 2.3.5. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

FTIR spectra of starting materials and PUR foam samples were collected using a Thermo Scientific Nicolet 6700 FTIR spectrometer equipped with a Smart iTR diamond attenuated total reflectance (ATR) accessory operated at 4 cm−1 spectral resolution over the wavenumber range of 4000–650 cm−1.


#### 2.3.6. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded in deuterated chloroform (CDCl3) on a Bruker Avance 400 nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer which operated at 400 MHz for 1H and 100 MHz for 13C nuclei. The chemical shifts (δ) are reported in parts per million (ppm) relative to the residual CHCl3 signal (7.26 ppm for 1H NMR and 77.0 ppm for 13C NMR).


#### 2.3.7. Electrospray Ionization-Mass Spectrometry

The components of synthesized polyols were characterized using electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). Mass spectrometry was carried out in positive ionization model on an amaZon SL Ion Trap Mass Spectrometers (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) equipped with a standard ESI source and HyStar 3.1 (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) control software. The sample was diluted in acetonitrile and then injected by direct infusion with a syringe pump at flow rate of 3.0μL/min using nitrogen both as nebulizer and as drying gas. Ion source voltages consisted of 140 V of capillary exit and scanned mass range was 70–1000m/z. In order to determine the free triethanolamine, the sample was diluted with acetonitrile containing 0.1% of formic acid and performed, following the same condition of qualitative analysis.


### 2.4. Rigid Polyurethane Foam Preparation

RPUR foams from seed oil-based polyols and commercial polyol were prepared by one-shot method [1]. Polyols, surfactant, catalyst, and blowing agent were premixed in a 700 mL paper cup with mechanical stirrer at 2000 rpm until they became homogeneous. Subsequently, a calculated amount of PMDI was added rapidly into the resulting mixture and was stirred continuously for 15 s at the same speed. The foam was allowed to rise and set freely at ambient condition. During foam generation, the foaming profile including (a) cream time, (b) gel time, (c) tack-free time, and (d) rise time [26] was recorded by a digital stop watch. After free-rise foaming had been completed, the foams were cured at room temperature for 48 hours before their physical and mechanical properties test. All sample tests were prepared in triplicate.The proportions of starting materials were calculated, which were 100 parts by weight (pbw) of polyols, shown in Table2. The final RPUR foams have been produced with desired density at 40–45 kg/m3. The resulting foam samples were further investigated for their mechanical and thermal properties.Table 2
Water-blown RPUR foams formulation.
Ingredients Amount (pbwa) Polyols 100 Seed oil-based polyols Polyether polyols (Raypol® 4218) Catalyst (DMCHA) 1.0 Blowing agent (distilled water) 3.0 Surfactant (TEGOSTAB® B8460) 2.5 PMDI (Suprasec® 5005) NCO indexb 175 aThe amounts of ingredients were calculated to be parts per 100 wt% of polyols. bNCO index refers to the excess amount of PMDI used over the theoretical equivalent amount which is required, expressed in percentage terms [1].


### 2.5. Foam Properties Measurement

#### 2.5.1. Apparent Density

The density of all foams was measured according to ASTM D1622-08 [27]. The foam samples were cut into cubes with dimension of 30 × 30 × 30 mm. The exact dimensions were measured using a vernier caliper and accurately weighed to determine their densities (kg/m3). The average of five measurements was calculated.


#### 2.5.2. Compression Testing

Compressive tests of foams parallel and perpendicular to the foam rise direction were performed using a Lloyd LRX universal testing machine. The dimension of the foam specimen was 30 × 30 × 30 mm (width × length × thickness). The rate of crosshead movement was fixed at 2.54 mm/min and the preload cell used was 0.1000 N. The compressive strength at 10% deformation of its original thickness was calculated and the average value of three specimens was reported.


#### 2.5.3. Morphology

The cellular structure of foams was observed using Hitachi S-4800 scanning electron microscope (SEM). The small portions of foams were cut and sliced carefully with sharp blade and stuck onto aluminum stubs. Then the samples were sputter-coated with gold before scanning under an accelerating voltage of 20 kV.


#### 2.5.4. Thermal Properties

The percentage weight loss and thermal degradation characteristics of RPUR foam samples were examined by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) using Mettler Toledo TGA/SDTA851e. The initial amount of test samples was approximately 2–20 mg. The samples were heated from ambient temperature to 800°C at a heating rate of 10°C/min under nitrogen gas atmosphere [19, 28].The room temperature thermal conductivity was performed using the Hot Disk Thermal Constant Analyzer TPS2500 (Hot Disk AB) with 50 × 50 × 20 mm (width × length × thickness) of sample size. Disk type was Kapton Insulation (sensor number C7577, radius = 2.001 mm). Three measurements were made for each study and the average was reported.


## 2.1. Materials

Sesame seed oil and pumpkin seed oil were provided by the Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Chulalongkorn University. Their characteristics and fatty acid profile are illustrated in Table1. Hydrogen peroxide (30 wt%) from Merck, formic acid (98 wt%) from Fisher Scientific, triethanolamine (85 wt%) from Ajax Finechem, and lithium hydroxide (99 wt%) from Fluka were used for polyols preparation.Table 1
Characteristics and fatty acid composition of sesame seed oil and pumpkin seed oil.
Sesame seed oil Pumpkin seed oil Color (naked eyes) Light brown Dark green Viscosity (at 25°C, cps) 136 ± 3 160 ± 6 Acid value (mg KOH/g) 7.23 ± 0.18 2.13 ± 0.14 Water content (wt%) 0.08 0.09  Fatty acid  (FA) profile (wt%) Palmitic acid (C16:0) 11.40 13.04 Stearic acid (C18:0) 4.30 4.60 Oleic acid (C18:1) 37.00 34.82 Linoleic acid (C18:2) 47.30 47.55 Total unsaturated FAs 84.30 82.37For the preparation of water-blown RPUR foams, the isocyanate Suprasec® 5005 (polymeric methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (PMDI); NCO content = 31.0 wt%; average functionality = 2.7), the commercial polyether polyol Raypol 4218 (OH number = 438 mg KOH/g), the polyether dimethyl siloxane surfactant TEGOSTAB® B8460, and the foaming catalyst DMCHA (N,N-dimethylcyclohexylamine) were supplied from Huntsman (Thailand) Co., Ltd. and IRPC Public Co., Ltd.


## 2.2. Synthesis of Seed Oil-Based Polyols

### 2.2.1. Hydroxylation of Seed Oils

A portion of 30 wt% of hydrogen peroxide (0.27 mol, 27.60 mL) and 98 wt% of formic acid (0.54 mol, 20.80 mL) were mixed in a three-neck round bottom flask equipped with a stirrer, reflux condenser, and a thermometer. The mixture was heated to 40°C with constant stirring. Then the vegetable oil (0.18 mol, 50.00 g) was added dropwise and the temperature was kept at 40–50°C for 3 hours. After that, the reaction mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature. The liquid separated clearly into two layers. The bottom layer was removed, and the hydroxylated oil in the upper layer was recovered and distilled under vacuum to eliminate the remaining water and acid. The hydroxylated sesame seed oil was light pale yellow viscous liquid, whereas the hydroxylated pumpkin seed oil was dark green liquid.


### 2.2.2. Alcoholysis of Hydroxylated Seed Oils

The hydroxylated vegetable oil (1 mol, 50.00 g), 85 wt% of triethanolamine (3 mol, 30.17 g), and lithium hydroxide (0.2 wt% of total weight, 0.16 g) were mixed together in a flask with mechanical stirrer and thermometer. The reaction mixture was constantly stirred as the temperature was raised to 150°C in 0.5 hours. The reaction was continued at this temperature for 2.5 hours. The obtained polyols were dark pale yellow liquid with high viscosity. The resulting polyols were used without further purification.


## 2.2.1. Hydroxylation of Seed Oils

A portion of 30 wt% of hydrogen peroxide (0.27 mol, 27.60 mL) and 98 wt% of formic acid (0.54 mol, 20.80 mL) were mixed in a three-neck round bottom flask equipped with a stirrer, reflux condenser, and a thermometer. The mixture was heated to 40°C with constant stirring. Then the vegetable oil (0.18 mol, 50.00 g) was added dropwise and the temperature was kept at 40–50°C for 3 hours. After that, the reaction mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature. The liquid separated clearly into two layers. The bottom layer was removed, and the hydroxylated oil in the upper layer was recovered and distilled under vacuum to eliminate the remaining water and acid. The hydroxylated sesame seed oil was light pale yellow viscous liquid, whereas the hydroxylated pumpkin seed oil was dark green liquid.


## 2.2.2. Alcoholysis of Hydroxylated Seed Oils

The hydroxylated vegetable oil (1 mol, 50.00 g), 85 wt% of triethanolamine (3 mol, 30.17 g), and lithium hydroxide (0.2 wt% of total weight, 0.16 g) were mixed together in a flask with mechanical stirrer and thermometer. The reaction mixture was constantly stirred as the temperature was raised to 150°C in 0.5 hours. The reaction was continued at this temperature for 2.5 hours. The obtained polyols were dark pale yellow liquid with high viscosity. The resulting polyols were used without further purification.


## 2.3. Polyols Characterization

### 2.3.1. Hydroxyl Number

OH numbers of seed oil-based polyols were determined according to ASTM D4274-11, test method D-reflux phthalation [23].


### 2.3.2. Acid Number

The acid number of polyols was evaluated following ASTM D4662-08 [24].


### 2.3.3. Water Content

The water content of polyols is defined as the water concentration (mg/kg or percentage) contained in the synthesized polyols which could be determined using a Metrohm 831 KF coulometer with 703 Ti stand. The coulometric Karl Fischer titration procedure was performed according to ASTM D6304-07, procedure C-water evaporator accessory [25].


### 2.3.4. Viscosity Measurement

The dynamic viscosity of synthesized polyols was determined using a digital VR 3000 MYR viscometer at25±0.1°C.


### 2.3.5. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

FTIR spectra of starting materials and PUR foam samples were collected using a Thermo Scientific Nicolet 6700 FTIR spectrometer equipped with a Smart iTR diamond attenuated total reflectance (ATR) accessory operated at 4 cm−1 spectral resolution over the wavenumber range of 4000–650 cm−1.


### 2.3.6. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded in deuterated chloroform (CDCl3) on a Bruker Avance 400 nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer which operated at 400 MHz for 1H and 100 MHz for 13C nuclei. The chemical shifts (δ) are reported in parts per million (ppm) relative to the residual CHCl3 signal (7.26 ppm for 1H NMR and 77.0 ppm for 13C NMR).


### 2.3.7. Electrospray Ionization-Mass Spectrometry

The components of synthesized polyols were characterized using electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). Mass spectrometry was carried out in positive ionization model on an amaZon SL Ion Trap Mass Spectrometers (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) equipped with a standard ESI source and HyStar 3.1 (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) control software. The sample was diluted in acetonitrile and then injected by direct infusion with a syringe pump at flow rate of 3.0μL/min using nitrogen both as nebulizer and as drying gas. Ion source voltages consisted of 140 V of capillary exit and scanned mass range was 70–1000m/z. In order to determine the free triethanolamine, the sample was diluted with acetonitrile containing 0.1% of formic acid and performed, following the same condition of qualitative analysis.


## 2.3.1. Hydroxyl Number

OH numbers of seed oil-based polyols were determined according to ASTM D4274-11, test method D-reflux phthalation [23].


## 2.3.2. Acid Number

The acid number of polyols was evaluated following ASTM D4662-08 [24].


## 2.3.3. Water Content

The water content of polyols is defined as the water concentration (mg/kg or percentage) contained in the synthesized polyols which could be determined using a Metrohm 831 KF coulometer with 703 Ti stand. The coulometric Karl Fischer titration procedure was performed according to ASTM D6304-07, procedure C-water evaporator accessory [25].


## 2.3.4. Viscosity Measurement

The dynamic viscosity of synthesized polyols was determined using a digital VR 3000 MYR viscometer at25±0.1°C.


## 2.3.5. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

FTIR spectra of starting materials and PUR foam samples were collected using a Thermo Scientific Nicolet 6700 FTIR spectrometer equipped with a Smart iTR diamond attenuated total reflectance (ATR) accessory operated at 4 cm−1 spectral resolution over the wavenumber range of 4000–650 cm−1.


## 2.3.6. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded in deuterated chloroform (CDCl3) on a Bruker Avance 400 nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer which operated at 400 MHz for 1H and 100 MHz for 13C nuclei. The chemical shifts (δ) are reported in parts per million (ppm) relative to the residual CHCl3 signal (7.26 ppm for 1H NMR and 77.0 ppm for 13C NMR).


## 2.3.7. Electrospray Ionization-Mass Spectrometry

The components of synthesized polyols were characterized using electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). Mass spectrometry was carried out in positive ionization model on an amaZon SL Ion Trap Mass Spectrometers (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) equipped with a standard ESI source and HyStar 3.1 (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) control software. The sample was diluted in acetonitrile and then injected by direct infusion with a syringe pump at flow rate of 3.0μL/min using nitrogen both as nebulizer and as drying gas. Ion source voltages consisted of 140 V of capillary exit and scanned mass range was 70–1000m/z. In order to determine the free triethanolamine, the sample was diluted with acetonitrile containing 0.1% of formic acid and performed, following the same condition of qualitative analysis.


## 2.4. Rigid Polyurethane Foam Preparation

RPUR foams from seed oil-based polyols and commercial polyol were prepared by one-shot method [1]. Polyols, surfactant, catalyst, and blowing agent were premixed in a 700 mL paper cup with mechanical stirrer at 2000 rpm until they became homogeneous. Subsequently, a calculated amount of PMDI was added rapidly into the resulting mixture and was stirred continuously for 15 s at the same speed. The foam was allowed to rise and set freely at ambient condition. During foam generation, the foaming profile including (a) cream time, (b) gel time, (c) tack-free time, and (d) rise time [26] was recorded by a digital stop watch. After free-rise foaming had been completed, the foams were cured at room temperature for 48 hours before their physical and mechanical properties test. All sample tests were prepared in triplicate.The proportions of starting materials were calculated, which were 100 parts by weight (pbw) of polyols, shown in Table2. The final RPUR foams have been produced with desired density at 40–45 kg/m3. The resulting foam samples were further investigated for their mechanical and thermal properties.Table 2
Water-blown RPUR foams formulation.
Ingredients Amount (pbwa) Polyols 100 Seed oil-based polyols Polyether polyols (Raypol® 4218) Catalyst (DMCHA) 1.0 Blowing agent (distilled water) 3.0 Surfactant (TEGOSTAB® B8460) 2.5 PMDI (Suprasec® 5005) NCO indexb 175 aThe amounts of ingredients were calculated to be parts per 100 wt% of polyols. bNCO index refers to the excess amount of PMDI used over the theoretical equivalent amount which is required, expressed in percentage terms [1].


## 2.5. Foam Properties Measurement

### 2.5.1. Apparent Density

The density of all foams was measured according to ASTM D1622-08 [27]. The foam samples were cut into cubes with dimension of 30 × 30 × 30 mm. The exact dimensions were measured using a vernier caliper and accurately weighed to determine their densities (kg/m3). The average of five measurements was calculated.


### 2.5.2. Compression Testing

Compressive tests of foams parallel and perpendicular to the foam rise direction were performed using a Lloyd LRX universal testing machine. The dimension of the foam specimen was 30 × 30 × 30 mm (width × length × thickness). The rate of crosshead movement was fixed at 2.54 mm/min and the preload cell used was 0.1000 N. The compressive strength at 10% deformation of its original thickness was calculated and the average value of three specimens was reported.


### 2.5.3. Morphology

The cellular structure of foams was observed using Hitachi S-4800 scanning electron microscope (SEM). The small portions of foams were cut and sliced carefully with sharp blade and stuck onto aluminum stubs. Then the samples were sputter-coated with gold before scanning under an accelerating voltage of 20 kV.


### 2.5.4. Thermal Properties

The percentage weight loss and thermal degradation characteristics of RPUR foam samples were examined by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) using Mettler Toledo TGA/SDTA851e. The initial amount of test samples was approximately 2–20 mg. The samples were heated from ambient temperature to 800°C at a heating rate of 10°C/min under nitrogen gas atmosphere [19, 28].The room temperature thermal conductivity was performed using the Hot Disk Thermal Constant Analyzer TPS2500 (Hot Disk AB) with 50 × 50 × 20 mm (width × length × thickness) of sample size. Disk type was Kapton Insulation (sensor number C7577, radius = 2.001 mm). Three measurements were made for each study and the average was reported.


## 2.5.1. Apparent Density

The density of all foams was measured according to ASTM D1622-08 [27]. The foam samples were cut into cubes with dimension of 30 × 30 × 30 mm. The exact dimensions were measured using a vernier caliper and accurately weighed to determine their densities (kg/m3). The average of five measurements was calculated.


## 2.5.2. Compression Testing

Compressive tests of foams parallel and perpendicular to the foam rise direction were performed using a Lloyd LRX universal testing machine. The dimension of the foam specimen was 30 × 30 × 30 mm (width × length × thickness). The rate of crosshead movement was fixed at 2.54 mm/min and the preload cell used was 0.1000 N. The compressive strength at 10% deformation of its original thickness was calculated and the average value of three specimens was reported.


## 2.5.3. Morphology

The cellular structure of foams was observed using Hitachi S-4800 scanning electron microscope (SEM). The small portions of foams were cut and sliced carefully with sharp blade and stuck onto aluminum stubs. Then the samples were sputter-coated with gold before scanning under an accelerating voltage of 20 kV.


## 2.5.4. Thermal Properties

The percentage weight loss and thermal degradation characteristics of RPUR foam samples were examined by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) using Mettler Toledo TGA/SDTA851e. The initial amount of test samples was approximately 2–20 mg. The samples were heated from ambient temperature to 800°C at a heating rate of 10°C/min under nitrogen gas atmosphere [19, 28].The room temperature thermal conductivity was performed using the Hot Disk Thermal Constant Analyzer TPS2500 (Hot Disk AB) with 50 × 50 × 20 mm (width × length × thickness) of sample size. Disk type was Kapton Insulation (sensor number C7577, radius = 2.001 mm). Three measurements were made for each study and the average was reported.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Seed Oil-Based Polyols

The biopolyols from sesame seed oil (SSO) and pumpkin seed oil (PO) can be synthesized by two steps, which comprise hydroxylation and alcoholysis reactions. The composition of fatty acid in their nature has high double bonds content as shown in Table1. They can be simply modified at unsaturated units to introduce multiple OH groups by first hydroxylation reaction with commonly used oxidizing agents such as peroxy acids. For this study, peroxyformic acids were generated by the reactions of formic acid with hydrogen peroxide to react at double bonds position of fatty acid chains. The occurring epoxide intermediates could be open ringed subsequently under strong acidic condition to form OH groups [10, 12].Table3 shows the characteristics of modified seed oils. Based on the unsaturated fatty acid composition sesame seed oil-based and pumpkin seed oil-based polyols had OH value as 351 and 340 mg KOH/g, respectively, which could be used as a typical requirement for RPUR foam preparation. The viscosity of synthesized products was increased after the first and second modification since the increase of OH groups generates the strong intermolecular and intramolecular interaction. The viscosity of PO polyol is lower than that of SSO polyol. Moreover, the trend of acid value of modified seed oils was rising due to the synthetic process which occurred under acidic condition.Table 3
Physicochemical properties of modified seed oils.
Types Properties Sesame seed oil Pumpkin seed oil Unmodified Color (visual) Light blown Dark green Viscosity (at 25°C, cP) 136 ± 3 160 ± 6 Acid value (mg KOH/g) 7.23 ± 0.18 2.13 ± 0.14 Water content (wt%) 0.08 0.09  Hydroxylation Color (visual) Brown Dark green Viscosity (at 25°C, cP) 7302 ± 19 6722 ± 19 OH number (mg KOH/g) 85.64 ± 0.91 84.25 ± 1.04 Acid value (mg KOH/g) 16.30 ± 0.18 10.27 ± 0.16 Water content (wt%) 0.38 0.80  Alcoholysis Color (visual) Brown Dark green Viscosity (at 25°C, cP) 11278 ± 29 9862 ± 47 OH number (mg KOH/g) 351.03 ± 3.84 340.24 ± 6.80 Acid value (mg KOH/g) 10.29 ± 0.21 5.37 ± 0.19 Water content (wt%) 0.53 0.83


### 3.2. FTIR Analysis

The ATR-IR spectroscopy was used for qualitative identification of the chemical reaction of the polyols formation by the assignments of the major signals of unmodified seed oils and modified seed oils. Since IR spectra of all neat, hydroxylated, and alcoholized seed oils had similar characteristics, the ATR-IR data of sesame seed oil were only presented in Figure1.Figure 1
ATR-IR spectra of unmodified and modified seed oils: (a) virgin seed oil, (b) hydroxylated seed oil, and (c) alcoholized hydroxylated sesame seed oil.For the ATR-IR spectrum of virgin seed oil (Figure1(a)), the main peaks of triglyceride functional groups could be clearly observed. The peaks at 2925, 2853, and 1459 cm−1 were attributed to the asymmetric and symmetric C–H stretching and C–H bending vibration of –CH2– groups, respectively. The strong signal at 1740 cm−1 was assigned to C=O stretch of triglyceride ester groups. The weak absorption band (a shoulder) at 3014 cm−1 corresponded to C–H stretching of aliphatic C=C–H group, whereas the very small peak at 1649 cm−1 was attributed to C=C stretching vibration incis conformation. Moreover, the C–O stretch of ester groups could be observed at 1164 cm−1. After modification, the most important difference was the presence of a broadband around 3300–3500 cm−1, indicating an increase in hydroxyl groups by chemical reaction in agreement with higher OH numbers especially after alcoholysis. For hydroxylated oil, the double bonds absorption at 3014 and 1649 cm−1 disappeared, while the hydroxyl band was presented as shown in Figure 1(b and c). It was indicated that an unsaturated position in fatty acid chains was almost completely functionalized. Additionally, the characteristic peak of secondary hydroxyl group was shown in hydroxylated oil at around 1099 cm−1 region. Furthermore, the ester carbonyl peak of modified seed oil appeared broader and shifted from 1740 cm−1 to 1720–1730 cm−1, probably due to the esters and acids generated during the chemical process. When the alcoholysis reaction with triethanolamine was carried out, the obtained polyols were the mixture of various esters of triglycerides. In addition, the peak at signal 1596 cm−1 corresponded to the amides of fatty acids which occurred by aminolysis side reaction of triglyceride with triethanolamine [12, 21]. Besides, the band at 1057 cm−1 appeared in alcoholized seed oil arising from C–O stretching vibration of triethanolamine.However, there was clearly no research that studied and reported the amount of free triethanolamine present in the obtained polyols. Therefore, the remaining triethanolamine in the synthesized polyols was firstly confirmed and determined in this study using electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. Furthermore, free triethanolamine decreased the foaming times and increased the compressive strength of RPUR foams prepared from the vegetable oil-based polyols.


### 3.3. NMR Analysis

The chemical structures of the obtained biopolyols were characterized using1H NMR and 13C NMR analysis.From NMR data of sesame seed oil-based polyol and pumpkin seed oil-based polyol (Figures S1 and S2 in Supplementary Material available online athttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4909857), the presence of low signals at chemical shift (δ) of 5.40 ppm in 1H NMR and at δ = 125–135 ppm in 13C NMR was assigned to the remaining unsaturated fatty acid (CH=CH) in polyols. Moreover, the small signals above δ = 8.40 ppm in 1H NMR and at δ = 170–172 ppm in 13C NMR corresponded to the acid groups. These NMR data gave the characteristics of the main functional groups presenting in these biopolyols agreeing with those identified by FTIR analysis.


### 3.4. ESI-MS Analysis

#### 3.4.1. Qualitative Analysis of Synthesized Polyols

The synthesized seed oil-based polyols for rigid polyurethane foam preparation were formerly used without any purification and the foaming process and foam properties could be affected by the various components presented in these biopolyols. Therefore, the obtained polyols were characterized to identify the individual structural components using electrospray ionization-mass spectrometer (ESI-MS) in positive ionization mode. Figure2 represents the full scanned mass spectra of SSO polyol and PO polyol, respectively. The observed mass profiles of the major peaks are summarized in Table 4.Table 4
The main structural components in synthesized seed oil-based polyols identified by ESI-MS in positive ionization mode.
Structure Calculated mass Observed mass detected in seed oil-based polyols Sesame seed oil Pumpkin seed oil [M+H]+ [M+Na]+ [M+H]+ [M+Na]+ [M+H]+ [M+Na]+ Esters with triethanolamine Monoester-C(16:0)∗ 388.34 410.32 388.43 410.42 388.43 410.41 Monoester-C(18:0) 416.37 438.36 416.46 438.44 416.46 438.43 Monoester-C(18:0)-diol 448.36 470.35 448.45 470.42 448.44 470.41 Monoester-C(18:0)-tetraol –H2O 462.34 484.32 462.41 484.39 462.42 484.39 Diester-C(16:16:0)∗∗ 626.57 648.55 626.69 — 626.69 — Diester-C(16:18:0) 654.60 676.58 654.70 — 654.71 676.69 Diester-C(16:18:0)-diol 686.59 708.57 686.73 708.71 686.72 708.70 Diester-C(16:18:0)-tetraol –H2O 700.57 722.55 700.70 722.68 700.70 722.68 Diester-C(18:18:0)-diol 714.62 736.61 714.75 736.73 714.75 736.71 Diester-C(18:18:0)-tetraol 746.61 768.60 746.75 768.72 746.74 768.71 Diester-C(18:18:0)-tetraol –H2O 728.60 750.59 728.71 750.71 728.70 750.71 Diester-C(18:18:0)-hexaol 778.60 800.59 778.72 — — — Diester-C(18:18:0)-hexaol –H2O 760.59 782.57 760.72 782.70 760.72 782.70 Diester-C(18:18:0)-octaol –2H2O 774.57 796.55 774.70 796.69 774.70 796.67 Esters with triglyceride Monoglyceride-C(16:0)∗ 331.28 353.27 — 353.32 — 353.32 Monoglyceride-C(18:0) 359.32 381.30 — — — 381.35 Monoglyceride-C(18:0)-diol 391.31 413.29 — 413.36 — 413.35 Monoglyceride-C(18:0)-tetraol –H2O 405.28 427.27 — 427.33 — 427.33 Diglyceride-C(16:16:0)∗∗ 569.51 591.50 569.55 — 569.53 — Diglyceride-C(16:18:0) –H2O 579.53 601.52 — 601.53 — 601.53 Diglyceride-C(16:18:2) 593.51 615.50 — 615.49 — 615.50 Diglyceride-C(16:18:0)-diol 629.53 651.52 — 651.54 — — ∗C(m:n); m, number of carbon atoms in fatty acid chain; n, number of double bonds remaining in fatty acid chain. ∗ ∗C(x:y:z); x, number of carbon atoms in 1st fatty acid chain; y, number of carbon atoms in 2nd fatty acid chain; and z, number of double bonds remaining in fatty acid chain.Figure 2
The positive ion ESI-MS spectra of synthesized seed oil-based polyols scanned at 70–1000m/z: (a) sesame seed oil-based polyol and (b) pumpkin seed oil-based polyol, respectively.
(a) (b)From ESI-MS data of the obtained polyols, the disappearance of glycerol peaks at [M+Na]+,m/z 115 was observed. It indicated that the biopolyols synthesized from the alcoholysis of hydroxylated seed oils and triethanolamine had variety of species, which mainly includes monoester and diester containing a variation of hydroxylated fatty acid chains. Additionally, the esters of triglyceride and the unreacted triethanolamine were detected in all the polyol systems.


#### 3.4.2. Quantitative Analysis of Free Triethanolamine Presented in Polyols

In PUR foam system, isocyanates could react with every active hydrogen compounds such as polyols, water, and amines. From ESI-MS data, the presence of free triethanolamine was significantly detected. Triethanolamine in synthesized polyols might affect the properties of RPUR foams. It has been reported that triethanolamine was used as a cocatalyst with tin compound in the foaming process [29]. Moreover, at high concentration, it was used as cross-link agent that provided the RPUR foams with high compressive strength without concerning the other properties [29]. Therefore, the quantitative analysis of triethanolamine remaining in SSO polyol and PO polyol was studied and calculated from total mass spectra of triethanolamine peaks at [M+H]+,m/z 150, [M+Na]+,m/z 172, and [M+K]+,m/z 188. It was found that the amounts of unreacted triethanolamine in SSO polyol and PO polyol were 1.95±0.19 wt% of polyol and 0.52±0.01 wt% of polyol, respectively. That significantly affected the reaction times and foam properties especially foam density as shown in Table 5. It shows that foaming times of bio-based RPUR foams were shorter than those of commercial foam. The low amount of free triethanolamine presenting in these biopolyols (typically 0.5–5.0 wt% of polyols) acts as a foaming catalyst accelerating the foaming time [30, 31]. In addition, it is known that polyurethane foams are highly complex systems. Practically, the specific formulation needs to be optimized in order to balance these reactions to obtain the desirable foam products [1]. The further study should evaluate and optimize the triethanolamine content used for synthesized polyols in the alcoholysis step, while the other parameters were kept constant.Table 5
Physical properties of RPUR foams prepared from optimized formulations.
Property PUR foam Sesame seed oil Pumpkin seed oil Raypol® 4218 Foaming time (s) Cream time 23 ± 2 22 ± 1 32 ± 1 Gel time 37 ± 1 36 ± 1 44 ± 1 Tack-free time 188 ± 4 181 ± 2 242 ± 3 Rise time 156 ± 4 145 ± 4 186 ± 3  Density (kg/m3) 40.84 ± 0.33 40.78 ± 0.56 44.05 ± 0.34  Compressive strength (kPa) Parallel to foam rise direction 240.2 ± 17.5 237.7 ± 10.3 303.1 ± 26.8 Perpendicular to foam rise direction 152.2 ± 21.3 152.3 ± 23.1 303.1 ± 26.8  Thermal conductivity (W/mK) at 25°C 0.0342 ± 0.0001 0.0339 ± 0.0001 0.0368 ± 0.0003


### 3.5. Preparation and Properties of RPUR Foams

In this work, the low density RPUR foams were produced with the density in the range of 40–45 kg/m3 with optimal formulation, shown in Table 2. From Table 5, although the foaming times of prepared seed oil-based RPUR foams were shorter than those of commercial foams, these characteristic times were acceptable for the production of foams by cup foaming method [27]. Furthermore, they promoted the low density bio-based foams. The foaming profile and density of bio-based foams were decreased not only by the presence of triethanolamine but also by the nature of polyols. The synthesized polyols mainly composed of polyester with OH number = 340–351 mg KOH/g, while Raypol 4218 polyol was polyether polyol having OH number = 438 mg KOH/g. The shorter foaming time and lower density of seed oil-based foams resulted from the lower cross-link polymer occurring in foam system.The ATR-IR spectra of main starting materials and resulting seed oil-based RPUR foams are shown in Figure3. It was worth noting that a broad hydroxyl band at 3300–3500 cm−1 and a free carbonyl group vibration peak at 1733 cm−1 in polyols were decreased, while the presence of characteristics absorption peaks of urethane and urea linkages was observed in RPUR foam. The peaks at 3345 and 1709 cm−1 were attributed to N–H stretching and C=O stretching vibration, respectively, whereas the signals at 1505 and 1215 cm−1 were assigned according to N–H bending and C–N–H asymmetric stretches of urethane and urea groups. Additionally, the characteristic bands at 2240 cm−1 region presented in RPUR foam corresponded to an unreacted –N=C=O group. Moreover, the isocyanurate network formation by additional trimerization of isocyanates could be observed as two peaks at 1594 and 1412 cm−1, associating with Ar–H and C–N isocyanurate [20, 28].Figure 3
ATR-IR spectra of starting materials and PUR foam: (a) PMDI, (b) seed oil polyols, and (c) seed oil PUR foam.


### 3.6. Morphology of RPUR Foams

The SEM images of foam samples are shown in Figure4. The structure of seed oil-based cell foams in the free-rise direction exhibited highly uniform and mostly closed cells. The rupture of cell membrane and some open cells might result from cutting samples. The foam cellular structure comprised dodecahedron-shaped cells (cell size of approximately 300–400 μm) with struts (cell edges) and thin cell window films [1]. In a converse direction, the foam cells were partially elongated probably resulting from mold shape under higher temperature and gas pressure present in core polymer matrix during foam expansion [12, 32, 33].Figure 4
SEM micrographs of resulting PUR foams in top view (upper) and side view (lower) of mold (50x): (a) sesame seed oil-based, (b) pumpkin seed oil-based, and (c) Raypol® 4218-based foams.
(a) (b) (c)


### 3.7. Mechanical Properties of RPUR Foams

Table5 shows some mechanical properties of the RPUR foams which were prepared following optimal formulation. All RPUR foams were produced at a density in the range of 40–45 kg/m3 which gave satisfactory mechanical properties for thermal insulating applications. Typically, the compressive strength of RPUR foams with this density range is from 250 to 300 kPa [29].The compression stress-strain curves of all synthesized RPUR foams with loading both parallel and transverse directions to the foam rising were presented in Figure5. Each curve shows three regions related to a deformation mechanism [34, 35]. There was a relationship between the initial linear domain at low stress and the elasticity of the materials; this was due to cell window stretching because of trapped gas pressure and their slope is Young’s modulus. After that, the long linear plateau region is observed at the stress value which does not change much. This collapsed plateau corresponds gradually to the collapsed cell by elastic buckling of cell walls or in brittle foams depending on the nature of solid polymer and cell morphology. The compressive strength is acquired from the stress at the yield point if it appears before 10% deformation or, in the absence of the yield point, from the stress at 10% deformation [29, 36]. When the cell wall was almost completely collapsed and crushed, the stress level is increased rapidly through the solid polymer. This third domain can be referred to as densification.Figure 5
Compression strain versus stress curves of PUR foams parallel and perpendicular to the foam rise direction with foam density in the range of 40–45 kg/m3.The compressive strength of RPUR foam samples in parallel to the foam rising was within the range of 237.7–240.2 kPa, whereas the compression in perpendicular direction was about 152 kPa. For low density RPUR foams, the compression strength would usually be dissimilar with the direction of the foam rise because of their anisotropy [2]. Raypol 4218 based foam showed higher compressive strength than seed oil-based foams because of its highest cross-link density. Although it was known that the strength properties of cellular materials do not only primarily depend on their density, this phenomenon was dependent on the basis of the polyols structure. The synthesized PUR foams had a variation of degree of cross-linking which leads to a difference in their mechanical properties [12, 28, 37]. When using polyester polyols from vegetable oils, the fatty acid chain would act as soft segment by plasticizing effects; therefore, the rigidity of the RPUR foams which were synthesized from these polyester polyols is less than that of commercial polyether polyols [8, 28, 37].As all RPUR foam samples displayed the anisotropy in compression, it was presumed that many cells were not perfectly spherical which was confirmed by SEM. From correlation data, it is supported that the mechanical properties of the cellular materials depend considerably on their densities and cell morphology [1, 2].


### 3.8. Thermal Properties of RPUR Foams

Thermal stability of seed oil-based RPUR foams and the commercial foams which had the density of 40–45 kg/m3 was investigated by TGA performed in nitrogen atmosphere. TGA and their derivative (DTG) curves are presented in Figure 6. The DTG curves revealed two distinct degradation stages. The initial decomposition temperature at 5% weight loss of all biopolyols-based RPUR foams was observed at approximately 258°C and the first decomposition stage (Tmax1) in the range of 300–330°C was associated to the degradation of thermally unstable urethane linkage. The second weight loss stage (Tmax2) occurred approximately at 425–470°C, correlating to the decomposition of the polyols chains, which could be dependent on the polyols structures and different internal cross-linking in polymer networks [11, 12].Figure 6
TGA and DTG curves of PUR foams at the heating rate of 10°C/min in N2 atmosphere.In addition, the room temperature thermal conductivity of synthesized RPUR foams was presented in Table5. The thermal conductivity value of the prepared water-blown RPUR foams was in the range of 0.0339–0.0368 W/mK which was higher than idealized RPUR foams (0.020–0.030 W/mK) [2]. Generally, it is accepted that the total thermal conductivity of PUR foams depends on the heat transfer between gas and polymer solid phase. The thermal conductivity of closed cell RPUR foams is relatively low because of small solid contents in the foam materials about 3–10% of the total volume. Therefore, their insulation performance is mainly governed by the conduction of trapped gas types and foam density [1]. In this work, water-blown RPUR foams were prepared and cured at ambient temperature for 48 hours before characterization. When using water as a green blowing agent, carbon dioxide is generated to form the foam cells. Among conventional blowing agents such as HCFCs, HFCs, and cyclopentane, CO2 has slightly higher gaseous thermal conductivity than those of other blowing agents (thermal conductivity of CO2 ~0.016 W/mK at 25°C) [2]. Although CO2 can diffuse out of foam within days, gases with large molecules can also take years to diffuse out of the same foam, and air can diffuse into the foam cells from several months to years. As a result, the thermal conductivity of full stabilization time of RPUR foams varied by several variations and it is difficult to measure under real environment [1]. Additionally, an increase in density of low density RPUR foams (30–50 kg/m3) led to a decrease in the thermal conductivity of foams, caused by an increase of the closed cell contents per unit volume [1, 38]. From the description above, the thermal conductivity of prepared RPUR foams using water as chemical blowing agent was moderately higher than those of commercial RPUR foams using other blowing agents such as HCFCs, HCFs, and pentane, primarily due to the captive gaseous blowing agent during foam process and after curing time [1, 2].


## 3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Seed Oil-Based Polyols

The biopolyols from sesame seed oil (SSO) and pumpkin seed oil (PO) can be synthesized by two steps, which comprise hydroxylation and alcoholysis reactions. The composition of fatty acid in their nature has high double bonds content as shown in Table1. They can be simply modified at unsaturated units to introduce multiple OH groups by first hydroxylation reaction with commonly used oxidizing agents such as peroxy acids. For this study, peroxyformic acids were generated by the reactions of formic acid with hydrogen peroxide to react at double bonds position of fatty acid chains. The occurring epoxide intermediates could be open ringed subsequently under strong acidic condition to form OH groups [10, 12].Table3 shows the characteristics of modified seed oils. Based on the unsaturated fatty acid composition sesame seed oil-based and pumpkin seed oil-based polyols had OH value as 351 and 340 mg KOH/g, respectively, which could be used as a typical requirement for RPUR foam preparation. The viscosity of synthesized products was increased after the first and second modification since the increase of OH groups generates the strong intermolecular and intramolecular interaction. The viscosity of PO polyol is lower than that of SSO polyol. Moreover, the trend of acid value of modified seed oils was rising due to the synthetic process which occurred under acidic condition.Table 3
Physicochemical properties of modified seed oils.
Types Properties Sesame seed oil Pumpkin seed oil Unmodified Color (visual) Light blown Dark green Viscosity (at 25°C, cP) 136 ± 3 160 ± 6 Acid value (mg KOH/g) 7.23 ± 0.18 2.13 ± 0.14 Water content (wt%) 0.08 0.09  Hydroxylation Color (visual) Brown Dark green Viscosity (at 25°C, cP) 7302 ± 19 6722 ± 19 OH number (mg KOH/g) 85.64 ± 0.91 84.25 ± 1.04 Acid value (mg KOH/g) 16.30 ± 0.18 10.27 ± 0.16 Water content (wt%) 0.38 0.80  Alcoholysis Color (visual) Brown Dark green Viscosity (at 25°C, cP) 11278 ± 29 9862 ± 47 OH number (mg KOH/g) 351.03 ± 3.84 340.24 ± 6.80 Acid value (mg KOH/g) 10.29 ± 0.21 5.37 ± 0.19 Water content (wt%) 0.53 0.83


## 3.2. FTIR Analysis

The ATR-IR spectroscopy was used for qualitative identification of the chemical reaction of the polyols formation by the assignments of the major signals of unmodified seed oils and modified seed oils. Since IR spectra of all neat, hydroxylated, and alcoholized seed oils had similar characteristics, the ATR-IR data of sesame seed oil were only presented in Figure1.Figure 1
ATR-IR spectra of unmodified and modified seed oils: (a) virgin seed oil, (b) hydroxylated seed oil, and (c) alcoholized hydroxylated sesame seed oil.For the ATR-IR spectrum of virgin seed oil (Figure1(a)), the main peaks of triglyceride functional groups could be clearly observed. The peaks at 2925, 2853, and 1459 cm−1 were attributed to the asymmetric and symmetric C–H stretching and C–H bending vibration of –CH2– groups, respectively. The strong signal at 1740 cm−1 was assigned to C=O stretch of triglyceride ester groups. The weak absorption band (a shoulder) at 3014 cm−1 corresponded to C–H stretching of aliphatic C=C–H group, whereas the very small peak at 1649 cm−1 was attributed to C=C stretching vibration incis conformation. Moreover, the C–O stretch of ester groups could be observed at 1164 cm−1. After modification, the most important difference was the presence of a broadband around 3300–3500 cm−1, indicating an increase in hydroxyl groups by chemical reaction in agreement with higher OH numbers especially after alcoholysis. For hydroxylated oil, the double bonds absorption at 3014 and 1649 cm−1 disappeared, while the hydroxyl band was presented as shown in Figure 1(b and c). It was indicated that an unsaturated position in fatty acid chains was almost completely functionalized. Additionally, the characteristic peak of secondary hydroxyl group was shown in hydroxylated oil at around 1099 cm−1 region. Furthermore, the ester carbonyl peak of modified seed oil appeared broader and shifted from 1740 cm−1 to 1720–1730 cm−1, probably due to the esters and acids generated during the chemical process. When the alcoholysis reaction with triethanolamine was carried out, the obtained polyols were the mixture of various esters of triglycerides. In addition, the peak at signal 1596 cm−1 corresponded to the amides of fatty acids which occurred by aminolysis side reaction of triglyceride with triethanolamine [12, 21]. Besides, the band at 1057 cm−1 appeared in alcoholized seed oil arising from C–O stretching vibration of triethanolamine.However, there was clearly no research that studied and reported the amount of free triethanolamine present in the obtained polyols. Therefore, the remaining triethanolamine in the synthesized polyols was firstly confirmed and determined in this study using electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. Furthermore, free triethanolamine decreased the foaming times and increased the compressive strength of RPUR foams prepared from the vegetable oil-based polyols.


## 3.3. NMR Analysis

The chemical structures of the obtained biopolyols were characterized using1H NMR and 13C NMR analysis.From NMR data of sesame seed oil-based polyol and pumpkin seed oil-based polyol (Figures S1 and S2 in Supplementary Material available online athttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4909857), the presence of low signals at chemical shift (δ) of 5.40 ppm in 1H NMR and at δ = 125–135 ppm in 13C NMR was assigned to the remaining unsaturated fatty acid (CH=CH) in polyols. Moreover, the small signals above δ = 8.40 ppm in 1H NMR and at δ = 170–172 ppm in 13C NMR corresponded to the acid groups. These NMR data gave the characteristics of the main functional groups presenting in these biopolyols agreeing with those identified by FTIR analysis.


## 3.4. ESI-MS Analysis

### 3.4.1. Qualitative Analysis of Synthesized Polyols

The synthesized seed oil-based polyols for rigid polyurethane foam preparation were formerly used without any purification and the foaming process and foam properties could be affected by the various components presented in these biopolyols. Therefore, the obtained polyols were characterized to identify the individual structural components using electrospray ionization-mass spectrometer (ESI-MS) in positive ionization mode. Figure2 represents the full scanned mass spectra of SSO polyol and PO polyol, respectively. The observed mass profiles of the major peaks are summarized in Table 4.Table 4
The main structural components in synthesized seed oil-based polyols identified by ESI-MS in positive ionization mode.
Structure Calculated mass Observed mass detected in seed oil-based polyols Sesame seed oil Pumpkin seed oil [M+H]+ [M+Na]+ [M+H]+ [M+Na]+ [M+H]+ [M+Na]+ Esters with triethanolamine Monoester-C(16:0)∗ 388.34 410.32 388.43 410.42 388.43 410.41 Monoester-C(18:0) 416.37 438.36 416.46 438.44 416.46 438.43 Monoester-C(18:0)-diol 448.36 470.35 448.45 470.42 448.44 470.41 Monoester-C(18:0)-tetraol –H2O 462.34 484.32 462.41 484.39 462.42 484.39 Diester-C(16:16:0)∗∗ 626.57 648.55 626.69 — 626.69 — Diester-C(16:18:0) 654.60 676.58 654.70 — 654.71 676.69 Diester-C(16:18:0)-diol 686.59 708.57 686.73 708.71 686.72 708.70 Diester-C(16:18:0)-tetraol –H2O 700.57 722.55 700.70 722.68 700.70 722.68 Diester-C(18:18:0)-diol 714.62 736.61 714.75 736.73 714.75 736.71 Diester-C(18:18:0)-tetraol 746.61 768.60 746.75 768.72 746.74 768.71 Diester-C(18:18:0)-tetraol –H2O 728.60 750.59 728.71 750.71 728.70 750.71 Diester-C(18:18:0)-hexaol 778.60 800.59 778.72 — — — Diester-C(18:18:0)-hexaol –H2O 760.59 782.57 760.72 782.70 760.72 782.70 Diester-C(18:18:0)-octaol –2H2O 774.57 796.55 774.70 796.69 774.70 796.67 Esters with triglyceride Monoglyceride-C(16:0)∗ 331.28 353.27 — 353.32 — 353.32 Monoglyceride-C(18:0) 359.32 381.30 — — — 381.35 Monoglyceride-C(18:0)-diol 391.31 413.29 — 413.36 — 413.35 Monoglyceride-C(18:0)-tetraol –H2O 405.28 427.27 — 427.33 — 427.33 Diglyceride-C(16:16:0)∗∗ 569.51 591.50 569.55 — 569.53 — Diglyceride-C(16:18:0) –H2O 579.53 601.52 — 601.53 — 601.53 Diglyceride-C(16:18:2) 593.51 615.50 — 615.49 — 615.50 Diglyceride-C(16:18:0)-diol 629.53 651.52 — 651.54 — — ∗C(m:n); m, number of carbon atoms in fatty acid chain; n, number of double bonds remaining in fatty acid chain. ∗ ∗C(x:y:z); x, number of carbon atoms in 1st fatty acid chain; y, number of carbon atoms in 2nd fatty acid chain; and z, number of double bonds remaining in fatty acid chain.Figure 2
The positive ion ESI-MS spectra of synthesized seed oil-based polyols scanned at 70–1000m/z: (a) sesame seed oil-based polyol and (b) pumpkin seed oil-based polyol, respectively.
(a) (b)From ESI-MS data of the obtained polyols, the disappearance of glycerol peaks at [M+Na]+,m/z 115 was observed. It indicated that the biopolyols synthesized from the alcoholysis of hydroxylated seed oils and triethanolamine had variety of species, which mainly includes monoester and diester containing a variation of hydroxylated fatty acid chains. Additionally, the esters of triglyceride and the unreacted triethanolamine were detected in all the polyol systems.


### 3.4.2. Quantitative Analysis of Free Triethanolamine Presented in Polyols

In PUR foam system, isocyanates could react with every active hydrogen compounds such as polyols, water, and amines. From ESI-MS data, the presence of free triethanolamine was significantly detected. Triethanolamine in synthesized polyols might affect the properties of RPUR foams. It has been reported that triethanolamine was used as a cocatalyst with tin compound in the foaming process [29]. Moreover, at high concentration, it was used as cross-link agent that provided the RPUR foams with high compressive strength without concerning the other properties [29]. Therefore, the quantitative analysis of triethanolamine remaining in SSO polyol and PO polyol was studied and calculated from total mass spectra of triethanolamine peaks at [M+H]+,m/z 150, [M+Na]+,m/z 172, and [M+K]+,m/z 188. It was found that the amounts of unreacted triethanolamine in SSO polyol and PO polyol were 1.95±0.19 wt% of polyol and 0.52±0.01 wt% of polyol, respectively. That significantly affected the reaction times and foam properties especially foam density as shown in Table 5. It shows that foaming times of bio-based RPUR foams were shorter than those of commercial foam. The low amount of free triethanolamine presenting in these biopolyols (typically 0.5–5.0 wt% of polyols) acts as a foaming catalyst accelerating the foaming time [30, 31]. In addition, it is known that polyurethane foams are highly complex systems. Practically, the specific formulation needs to be optimized in order to balance these reactions to obtain the desirable foam products [1]. The further study should evaluate and optimize the triethanolamine content used for synthesized polyols in the alcoholysis step, while the other parameters were kept constant.Table 5
Physical properties of RPUR foams prepared from optimized formulations.
Property PUR foam Sesame seed oil Pumpkin seed oil Raypol® 4218 Foaming time (s) Cream time 23 ± 2 22 ± 1 32 ± 1 Gel time 37 ± 1 36 ± 1 44 ± 1 Tack-free time 188 ± 4 181 ± 2 242 ± 3 Rise time 156 ± 4 145 ± 4 186 ± 3  Density (kg/m3) 40.84 ± 0.33 40.78 ± 0.56 44.05 ± 0.34  Compressive strength (kPa) Parallel to foam rise direction 240.2 ± 17.5 237.7 ± 10.3 303.1 ± 26.8 Perpendicular to foam rise direction 152.2 ± 21.3 152.3 ± 23.1 303.1 ± 26.8  Thermal conductivity (W/mK) at 25°C 0.0342 ± 0.0001 0.0339 ± 0.0001 0.0368 ± 0.0003


## 3.4.1. Qualitative Analysis of Synthesized Polyols

The synthesized seed oil-based polyols for rigid polyurethane foam preparation were formerly used without any purification and the foaming process and foam properties could be affected by the various components presented in these biopolyols. Therefore, the obtained polyols were characterized to identify the individual structural components using electrospray ionization-mass spectrometer (ESI-MS) in positive ionization mode. Figure2 represents the full scanned mass spectra of SSO polyol and PO polyol, respectively. The observed mass profiles of the major peaks are summarized in Table 4.Table 4
The main structural components in synthesized seed oil-based polyols identified by ESI-MS in positive ionization mode.
Structure Calculated mass Observed mass detected in seed oil-based polyols Sesame seed oil Pumpkin seed oil [M+H]+ [M+Na]+ [M+H]+ [M+Na]+ [M+H]+ [M+Na]+ Esters with triethanolamine Monoester-C(16:0)∗ 388.34 410.32 388.43 410.42 388.43 410.41 Monoester-C(18:0) 416.37 438.36 416.46 438.44 416.46 438.43 Monoester-C(18:0)-diol 448.36 470.35 448.45 470.42 448.44 470.41 Monoester-C(18:0)-tetraol –H2O 462.34 484.32 462.41 484.39 462.42 484.39 Diester-C(16:16:0)∗∗ 626.57 648.55 626.69 — 626.69 — Diester-C(16:18:0) 654.60 676.58 654.70 — 654.71 676.69 Diester-C(16:18:0)-diol 686.59 708.57 686.73 708.71 686.72 708.70 Diester-C(16:18:0)-tetraol –H2O 700.57 722.55 700.70 722.68 700.70 722.68 Diester-C(18:18:0)-diol 714.62 736.61 714.75 736.73 714.75 736.71 Diester-C(18:18:0)-tetraol 746.61 768.60 746.75 768.72 746.74 768.71 Diester-C(18:18:0)-tetraol –H2O 728.60 750.59 728.71 750.71 728.70 750.71 Diester-C(18:18:0)-hexaol 778.60 800.59 778.72 — — — Diester-C(18:18:0)-hexaol –H2O 760.59 782.57 760.72 782.70 760.72 782.70 Diester-C(18:18:0)-octaol –2H2O 774.57 796.55 774.70 796.69 774.70 796.67 Esters with triglyceride Monoglyceride-C(16:0)∗ 331.28 353.27 — 353.32 — 353.32 Monoglyceride-C(18:0) 359.32 381.30 — — — 381.35 Monoglyceride-C(18:0)-diol 391.31 413.29 — 413.36 — 413.35 Monoglyceride-C(18:0)-tetraol –H2O 405.28 427.27 — 427.33 — 427.33 Diglyceride-C(16:16:0)∗∗ 569.51 591.50 569.55 — 569.53 — Diglyceride-C(16:18:0) –H2O 579.53 601.52 — 601.53 — 601.53 Diglyceride-C(16:18:2) 593.51 615.50 — 615.49 — 615.50 Diglyceride-C(16:18:0)-diol 629.53 651.52 — 651.54 — — ∗C(m:n); m, number of carbon atoms in fatty acid chain; n, number of double bonds remaining in fatty acid chain. ∗ ∗C(x:y:z); x, number of carbon atoms in 1st fatty acid chain; y, number of carbon atoms in 2nd fatty acid chain; and z, number of double bonds remaining in fatty acid chain.Figure 2
The positive ion ESI-MS spectra of synthesized seed oil-based polyols scanned at 70–1000m/z: (a) sesame seed oil-based polyol and (b) pumpkin seed oil-based polyol, respectively.
(a) (b)From ESI-MS data of the obtained polyols, the disappearance of glycerol peaks at [M+Na]+,m/z 115 was observed. It indicated that the biopolyols synthesized from the alcoholysis of hydroxylated seed oils and triethanolamine had variety of species, which mainly includes monoester and diester containing a variation of hydroxylated fatty acid chains. Additionally, the esters of triglyceride and the unreacted triethanolamine were detected in all the polyol systems.


## 3.4.2. Quantitative Analysis of Free Triethanolamine Presented in Polyols

In PUR foam system, isocyanates could react with every active hydrogen compounds such as polyols, water, and amines. From ESI-MS data, the presence of free triethanolamine was significantly detected. Triethanolamine in synthesized polyols might affect the properties of RPUR foams. It has been reported that triethanolamine was used as a cocatalyst with tin compound in the foaming process [29]. Moreover, at high concentration, it was used as cross-link agent that provided the RPUR foams with high compressive strength without concerning the other properties [29]. Therefore, the quantitative analysis of triethanolamine remaining in SSO polyol and PO polyol was studied and calculated from total mass spectra of triethanolamine peaks at [M+H]+,m/z 150, [M+Na]+,m/z 172, and [M+K]+,m/z 188. It was found that the amounts of unreacted triethanolamine in SSO polyol and PO polyol were 1.95±0.19 wt% of polyol and 0.52±0.01 wt% of polyol, respectively. That significantly affected the reaction times and foam properties especially foam density as shown in Table 5. It shows that foaming times of bio-based RPUR foams were shorter than those of commercial foam. The low amount of free triethanolamine presenting in these biopolyols (typically 0.5–5.0 wt% of polyols) acts as a foaming catalyst accelerating the foaming time [30, 31]. In addition, it is known that polyurethane foams are highly complex systems. Practically, the specific formulation needs to be optimized in order to balance these reactions to obtain the desirable foam products [1]. The further study should evaluate and optimize the triethanolamine content used for synthesized polyols in the alcoholysis step, while the other parameters were kept constant.Table 5
Physical properties of RPUR foams prepared from optimized formulations.
Property PUR foam Sesame seed oil Pumpkin seed oil Raypol® 4218 Foaming time (s) Cream time 23 ± 2 22 ± 1 32 ± 1 Gel time 37 ± 1 36 ± 1 44 ± 1 Tack-free time 188 ± 4 181 ± 2 242 ± 3 Rise time 156 ± 4 145 ± 4 186 ± 3  Density (kg/m3) 40.84 ± 0.33 40.78 ± 0.56 44.05 ± 0.34  Compressive strength (kPa) Parallel to foam rise direction 240.2 ± 17.5 237.7 ± 10.3 303.1 ± 26.8 Perpendicular to foam rise direction 152.2 ± 21.3 152.3 ± 23.1 303.1 ± 26.8  Thermal conductivity (W/mK) at 25°C 0.0342 ± 0.0001 0.0339 ± 0.0001 0.0368 ± 0.0003


## 3.5. Preparation and Properties of RPUR Foams

In this work, the low density RPUR foams were produced with the density in the range of 40–45 kg/m3 with optimal formulation, shown in Table 2. From Table 5, although the foaming times of prepared seed oil-based RPUR foams were shorter than those of commercial foams, these characteristic times were acceptable for the production of foams by cup foaming method [27]. Furthermore, they promoted the low density bio-based foams. The foaming profile and density of bio-based foams were decreased not only by the presence of triethanolamine but also by the nature of polyols. The synthesized polyols mainly composed of polyester with OH number = 340–351 mg KOH/g, while Raypol 4218 polyol was polyether polyol having OH number = 438 mg KOH/g. The shorter foaming time and lower density of seed oil-based foams resulted from the lower cross-link polymer occurring in foam system.The ATR-IR spectra of main starting materials and resulting seed oil-based RPUR foams are shown in Figure3. It was worth noting that a broad hydroxyl band at 3300–3500 cm−1 and a free carbonyl group vibration peak at 1733 cm−1 in polyols were decreased, while the presence of characteristics absorption peaks of urethane and urea linkages was observed in RPUR foam. The peaks at 3345 and 1709 cm−1 were attributed to N–H stretching and C=O stretching vibration, respectively, whereas the signals at 1505 and 1215 cm−1 were assigned according to N–H bending and C–N–H asymmetric stretches of urethane and urea groups. Additionally, the characteristic bands at 2240 cm−1 region presented in RPUR foam corresponded to an unreacted –N=C=O group. Moreover, the isocyanurate network formation by additional trimerization of isocyanates could be observed as two peaks at 1594 and 1412 cm−1, associating with Ar–H and C–N isocyanurate [20, 28].Figure 3
ATR-IR spectra of starting materials and PUR foam: (a) PMDI, (b) seed oil polyols, and (c) seed oil PUR foam.


## 3.6. Morphology of RPUR Foams

The SEM images of foam samples are shown in Figure4. The structure of seed oil-based cell foams in the free-rise direction exhibited highly uniform and mostly closed cells. The rupture of cell membrane and some open cells might result from cutting samples. The foam cellular structure comprised dodecahedron-shaped cells (cell size of approximately 300–400 μm) with struts (cell edges) and thin cell window films [1]. In a converse direction, the foam cells were partially elongated probably resulting from mold shape under higher temperature and gas pressure present in core polymer matrix during foam expansion [12, 32, 33].Figure 4
SEM micrographs of resulting PUR foams in top view (upper) and side view (lower) of mold (50x): (a) sesame seed oil-based, (b) pumpkin seed oil-based, and (c) Raypol® 4218-based foams.
(a) (b) (c)


## 3.7. Mechanical Properties of RPUR Foams

Table5 shows some mechanical properties of the RPUR foams which were prepared following optimal formulation. All RPUR foams were produced at a density in the range of 40–45 kg/m3 which gave satisfactory mechanical properties for thermal insulating applications. Typically, the compressive strength of RPUR foams with this density range is from 250 to 300 kPa [29].The compression stress-strain curves of all synthesized RPUR foams with loading both parallel and transverse directions to the foam rising were presented in Figure5. Each curve shows three regions related to a deformation mechanism [34, 35]. There was a relationship between the initial linear domain at low stress and the elasticity of the materials; this was due to cell window stretching because of trapped gas pressure and their slope is Young’s modulus. After that, the long linear plateau region is observed at the stress value which does not change much. This collapsed plateau corresponds gradually to the collapsed cell by elastic buckling of cell walls or in brittle foams depending on the nature of solid polymer and cell morphology. The compressive strength is acquired from the stress at the yield point if it appears before 10% deformation or, in the absence of the yield point, from the stress at 10% deformation [29, 36]. When the cell wall was almost completely collapsed and crushed, the stress level is increased rapidly through the solid polymer. This third domain can be referred to as densification.Figure 5
Compression strain versus stress curves of PUR foams parallel and perpendicular to the foam rise direction with foam density in the range of 40–45 kg/m3.The compressive strength of RPUR foam samples in parallel to the foam rising was within the range of 237.7–240.2 kPa, whereas the compression in perpendicular direction was about 152 kPa. For low density RPUR foams, the compression strength would usually be dissimilar with the direction of the foam rise because of their anisotropy [2]. Raypol 4218 based foam showed higher compressive strength than seed oil-based foams because of its highest cross-link density. Although it was known that the strength properties of cellular materials do not only primarily depend on their density, this phenomenon was dependent on the basis of the polyols structure. The synthesized PUR foams had a variation of degree of cross-linking which leads to a difference in their mechanical properties [12, 28, 37]. When using polyester polyols from vegetable oils, the fatty acid chain would act as soft segment by plasticizing effects; therefore, the rigidity of the RPUR foams which were synthesized from these polyester polyols is less than that of commercial polyether polyols [8, 28, 37].As all RPUR foam samples displayed the anisotropy in compression, it was presumed that many cells were not perfectly spherical which was confirmed by SEM. From correlation data, it is supported that the mechanical properties of the cellular materials depend considerably on their densities and cell morphology [1, 2].


## 3.8. Thermal Properties of RPUR Foams

Thermal stability of seed oil-based RPUR foams and the commercial foams which had the density of 40–45 kg/m3 was investigated by TGA performed in nitrogen atmosphere. TGA and their derivative (DTG) curves are presented in Figure 6. The DTG curves revealed two distinct degradation stages. The initial decomposition temperature at 5% weight loss of all biopolyols-based RPUR foams was observed at approximately 258°C and the first decomposition stage (Tmax1) in the range of 300–330°C was associated to the degradation of thermally unstable urethane linkage. The second weight loss stage (Tmax2) occurred approximately at 425–470°C, correlating to the decomposition of the polyols chains, which could be dependent on the polyols structures and different internal cross-linking in polymer networks [11, 12].Figure 6
TGA and DTG curves of PUR foams at the heating rate of 10°C/min in N2 atmosphere.In addition, the room temperature thermal conductivity of synthesized RPUR foams was presented in Table5. The thermal conductivity value of the prepared water-blown RPUR foams was in the range of 0.0339–0.0368 W/mK which was higher than idealized RPUR foams (0.020–0.030 W/mK) [2]. Generally, it is accepted that the total thermal conductivity of PUR foams depends on the heat transfer between gas and polymer solid phase. The thermal conductivity of closed cell RPUR foams is relatively low because of small solid contents in the foam materials about 3–10% of the total volume. Therefore, their insulation performance is mainly governed by the conduction of trapped gas types and foam density [1]. In this work, water-blown RPUR foams were prepared and cured at ambient temperature for 48 hours before characterization. When using water as a green blowing agent, carbon dioxide is generated to form the foam cells. Among conventional blowing agents such as HCFCs, HFCs, and cyclopentane, CO2 has slightly higher gaseous thermal conductivity than those of other blowing agents (thermal conductivity of CO2 ~0.016 W/mK at 25°C) [2]. Although CO2 can diffuse out of foam within days, gases with large molecules can also take years to diffuse out of the same foam, and air can diffuse into the foam cells from several months to years. As a result, the thermal conductivity of full stabilization time of RPUR foams varied by several variations and it is difficult to measure under real environment [1]. Additionally, an increase in density of low density RPUR foams (30–50 kg/m3) led to a decrease in the thermal conductivity of foams, caused by an increase of the closed cell contents per unit volume [1, 38]. From the description above, the thermal conductivity of prepared RPUR foams using water as chemical blowing agent was moderately higher than those of commercial RPUR foams using other blowing agents such as HCFCs, HCFs, and pentane, primarily due to the captive gaseous blowing agent during foam process and after curing time [1, 2].


## 4. Conclusion

Bio-based polyols from an alternative resource including sesame and pumpkin seed oils were completely synthesized by simple hydroxylation following alcoholysis reaction. The resulting polyols exhibited OH number in the range of 340–351 mg KOH/g, which is suitable for RPUR foam preparation, and relatively high viscosity (9862–11278 cps) comparable to commercial polyols. ATR-IR, NMR, and ESI-MS data were used to confirm the formation of polyols.The water-blown RPUR foams from these biopolyols were successfully prepared by optimized formulation with the density in the range of 40–45 kg/m3 and displayed the satisfactory mechanical and thermal performance. Additionally, the cellular structure of seed oil-based foams presented anisotropy in polygonal shaped cells. From the detailed experimental data, it was indicated that the obtained RPUR foams from seed oils not only exhibited behaviors slightly comparable to those of the commercial foams but also possessed the potential and favorable economics as a renewable resource for RPUR foam preparation.



---

*Source: 4909857-2016-09-28.xml*