# Oil Coking Prevention Using Electric Water Pump for Turbo-Charge Spark-Ignition Engines

Authors: Han-Ching Lin; Yen-Tso Chang; Go-Long Tsai; Dao-Ming Wang; Feng-Chi Hsieh; Jinn-Feng Jiang
Journal: Mathematical Problems in Engineering
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

Turbocharger has been widely implemented for internal combustion engine to increase an engine's power output and reduce fuel consumption. However, its operating temperature would rise to 340°C when engine stalls. This higher temperature may results in bearing wear, run-out, and stick, due to oil coking and insufficient lubrication. In order to overcome these problems, this paper employs Electric Water Pump (EWP) to supply cool liquid to turbocharger actively when the engine stalls. The system layout, operating timing, and duration of EWP are investigated for obtaining optimal performance. The primarily experimental results show that the proposed layout and control strategy have a lower temperature of 100°C than the conventional temperature 225°C.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In order to reduce CO2 emission and fuel consumption, Turbocharged (T/C) technology has been widely implemented for reciprocating internal combustion engine [1, 2]. Turbocharger driven by exhaust gas turbine can be used to increase charging air to cylinder and then produce more engine power output. Petitjean [3] obtained T/C engine of 30% downsizing that has the same performance as original nature-charged one without downsizing, and its fuel consumption can be reduced about 8~10%. Lecointe and Monnier [4] also obtained that T/C used with downsizing, GDI, or variable valve timing technology has larger torque output in low engine speed, better fuel economy, and shorter light-off time of catalytic converter on a cold start.Since more air charging would increase combustion power as well as combustion temperature, the temperature of turbocharger would also increase because it is driven by 800~900°C exhaust gas. Moreover, once the engine stalls, the temperature of turbocharger would significantly increase to 200°C due to uncirculated cooling fluid. This higher temperature may result in engine oil coking. Ribeiro et al. [5] obtained the turbocharger bearing temperature increased from 95°C to 340°C within 40 seconds when engine stalls. After 90 seconds, the bearing temperature would decrease to about 135°C, if the temperature of turbocharger is higher than 204°C, which may cause damage to the oil quality. Moreover, if the temperature is over than 315°C, it may cause oil coke. Honeywell [6] had tested the engine soak temperature, and the finding from the research is that booster ministry parts can reach as high as 260°C~360°C.Thus, four conditions are required by Garrett [7] to prevent turbocharger from overheating: (1) avoid idle time more than 20 minutes; (2) have no coasting on a nature gear while stalling; (3) keep 3~5 minutes of idle time until lubricating oil pressure has been established on the engine; (4) keep 3~5 minutes of idle time before stalling. However, it is very difficult to have a driver that follows these requirements. Ribeiro et al. [5] employed Electric Water Pump (EWP) to deal with the thermal problem of turbocharger when the engine stalls.Comparing the EWP with conventional electric thermostat [8, 9], EWP can provide us with the following advantages: (1) provide active cooling and circulation for the T/C engine to prevent boiling over when the engine stalls; (2) supply more accurate engine temperature control to reduce engine friction losses; (3) reduce engine warm-up periods, as well as engine-out emissions. Riberio et al. [10] employed EWP to control engine coolant temperature for a 1.0L 8V engine. The experimental results show that coolant temperature as well as oil temperature of the targeted engine with EWP has faster warm-up period than conventional one about 1 and 3 minute(s), respectively.Kawamoto et al. [11] applied the electronic pump technology to develop Hybrid Vehicle and lower fuel consumption by 1 to 4 percent.The coolant flow into EWP needs to carry out the heat load can be obtained by using the following equation [12, 13]:
(1)Qc=m˙cCp(T2-T1),m˙c=ρc∀˙,
where Qc is heat rejection to coolant (kJ/s), m˙c is coolant mass flow rate (kg/s), Cp is specific heat capacity of the coolant (kJ/kg-K), T1 is temperature at engine inlet (K), T2 is temperature at engine outlet (K), ρc is coolant density (kg/m3), and ∀˙ is coolant volume flow rate (m3/s).The purpose of this paper is to employ EWP for supplying cooling liquid actively to turbocharger when engine stalls [14]. The EWP system layout, operating timing, and duration of EWP are investigated for obtaining optimal performance, that is, lowering the temperature of turbocharger. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. For every layout and testing conditions of cooling system with EWP are introduced in Section 2, the relationship between original layout and the temperature of turbocharger are discussed in Section 3. Secondly, the effects of different cooling layouts of EWP on the temperatures of turbocharger are evaluated using a dynamometer described in Section 4. Lastly, the conclusions are reached in Section 5.


## 2. Experimental Setup

### 2.1. Target Engine

A 4-cylinder 4-stroke 2.2 L turbo-charged spark-ignition engine was utilized in this paper, and a summary of its specifications is shown in Table1.Table 1
Specification of target engine.
Type
Turbocharged Inline-4
Bore × stroke [mm]
86 × 94.6
Displacement [L]
2.2
Valve/cylinder
4
Compression ratio
9.5 : 1
Peak power [kW/rpm]
130/5000
Maximum torque  [Nm/rpm]
275/3000
Emission standard
Euro 5A 240 kW Eddy current dynamometer was used to study the effect of different cooling layout on the coolant, oil, and turbocharger temperatures, with test environment settings as Table2.Table 2
Environmental conditions of engine testing.
Conditions
Description
Fuel
Type: RON95
Temperature control: below 40°C
Temperature measuring position: before fuel rail
Engine oil
Type: 10W40
Temperature control: N/A
Temperature measuring position: oil dish
Liquid coolant
Concentration of antifreeze fluid: 60%
Air charging
Temperature control: 25 ± 10°C
Temperature measuring position: air box inlets


### 2.2. Location of Thermocouple

Four thermal couples were used to measured coolant inlet/outlet and oil inlet/outlet temperatures (see Figure1) for analyzing thermal performance of the EWP.Figure 1
The locations of the four thermocouples.


### 2.3. Layout of Cooling System

In order to study the effect of different cooling layouts, three exiting vehicle cooling layouts, which consist of Mini Cooper, VW FSI, and VW TSI, were studied in this paper. The EWP of Mini Cooper is serially connected with inlet coolant pipe of T/C, and the coolant flows into the engine in the same direction. For the VW FSI, the EWP is serially connected to cooling outlet pipe of T/C and operates 15 minutes after stalling. The direction of its coolant’s flow was reversed to engine one. The EWP of VW TSI is serially connected to the cooling outlet pipe of T/C. Once the engine stalls, the EWP will start running for 8 minutes. Its coolant follows the direction same as that of engine one. After going through deep comparison mentioned above, each comparison result is shown in Table3.Table 3
EWP serial-type layouts.
T/C location
Flow direction
Layout
Serially connecting inlet coolant of T/C
The direction of engine rotation
Serially connecting outlet coolant of T/C
The reverse direction of engine rotation
Serially connecting inlet coolant of T/C
The direction of engine rotationTwo cooling system layouts, which consist of serial and parallel types, are proposed in this paper. For the proposed serial type of Figure2, the EWP is serially connected to inlet cooling pipe of T/C. It is for the advantage that the modification on the system architecture is not significant. However, its cooling rate also cannot be changed due to inlet pipe size. For the proposed parallel type of Figure 3, since the EWP is connected to inlet cooling pipe of T/C in parallel through three link pipes, its cooling rate can be better controlled upon cooling efficiency than that of the serial type. However, the costs of parallel type would be increased by reason of more component parts.Figure 2
Proposed serial-type layout of EWP.Figure 3
Proposed parallel-type layout of EWP.


### 2.4. Layout of Cooling System

The proposed system was evaluated in the dynamometer. First, the engine was operated at 5000 rpm at wide open throttle. After engine coolant temperature rising to 105°C, the tested engine would stall. Four thermocouples were then used to measure coolant temperatures of the turbocharger (see Figure1). Different operation time for the EWP was used to evaluate thermal efficiency of the proposed system.


## 2.1. Target Engine

A 4-cylinder 4-stroke 2.2 L turbo-charged spark-ignition engine was utilized in this paper, and a summary of its specifications is shown in Table1.Table 1
Specification of target engine.
Type
Turbocharged Inline-4
Bore × stroke [mm]
86 × 94.6
Displacement [L]
2.2
Valve/cylinder
4
Compression ratio
9.5 : 1
Peak power [kW/rpm]
130/5000
Maximum torque  [Nm/rpm]
275/3000
Emission standard
Euro 5A 240 kW Eddy current dynamometer was used to study the effect of different cooling layout on the coolant, oil, and turbocharger temperatures, with test environment settings as Table2.Table 2
Environmental conditions of engine testing.
Conditions
Description
Fuel
Type: RON95
Temperature control: below 40°C
Temperature measuring position: before fuel rail
Engine oil
Type: 10W40
Temperature control: N/A
Temperature measuring position: oil dish
Liquid coolant
Concentration of antifreeze fluid: 60%
Air charging
Temperature control: 25 ± 10°C
Temperature measuring position: air box inlets


## 2.2. Location of Thermocouple

Four thermal couples were used to measured coolant inlet/outlet and oil inlet/outlet temperatures (see Figure1) for analyzing thermal performance of the EWP.Figure 1
The locations of the four thermocouples.


## 2.3. Layout of Cooling System

In order to study the effect of different cooling layouts, three exiting vehicle cooling layouts, which consist of Mini Cooper, VW FSI, and VW TSI, were studied in this paper. The EWP of Mini Cooper is serially connected with inlet coolant pipe of T/C, and the coolant flows into the engine in the same direction. For the VW FSI, the EWP is serially connected to cooling outlet pipe of T/C and operates 15 minutes after stalling. The direction of its coolant’s flow was reversed to engine one. The EWP of VW TSI is serially connected to the cooling outlet pipe of T/C. Once the engine stalls, the EWP will start running for 8 minutes. Its coolant follows the direction same as that of engine one. After going through deep comparison mentioned above, each comparison result is shown in Table3.Table 3
EWP serial-type layouts.
T/C location
Flow direction
Layout
Serially connecting inlet coolant of T/C
The direction of engine rotation
Serially connecting outlet coolant of T/C
The reverse direction of engine rotation
Serially connecting inlet coolant of T/C
The direction of engine rotationTwo cooling system layouts, which consist of serial and parallel types, are proposed in this paper. For the proposed serial type of Figure2, the EWP is serially connected to inlet cooling pipe of T/C. It is for the advantage that the modification on the system architecture is not significant. However, its cooling rate also cannot be changed due to inlet pipe size. For the proposed parallel type of Figure 3, since the EWP is connected to inlet cooling pipe of T/C in parallel through three link pipes, its cooling rate can be better controlled upon cooling efficiency than that of the serial type. However, the costs of parallel type would be increased by reason of more component parts.Figure 2
Proposed serial-type layout of EWP.Figure 3
Proposed parallel-type layout of EWP.


## 2.4. Layout of Cooling System

The proposed system was evaluated in the dynamometer. First, the engine was operated at 5000 rpm at wide open throttle. After engine coolant temperature rising to 105°C, the tested engine would stall. Four thermocouples were then used to measure coolant temperatures of the turbocharger (see Figure1). Different operation time for the EWP was used to evaluate thermal efficiency of the proposed system.


## 3. Experimental Results of Original Layout

### 3.1. Original Engine

The experimental results of the original engine are shown in Figure4. The maximum coolant outlet temperature of T/C closes to 225°C when engine stalls after 5 minutes after running. After engine stalls for 41 minutes, the inlet and outlet coolant temperatures of T/C are decreased to 100°C and 125°C, respectively, since the measured temperature of original engine exceeds 225°C, which may damage a turbocharger’s bearings, as well as oil qualities.Figure 4
Experimental results of T/C temperatures for the original engine.


### 3.2. Original Vehicle

In order to simplify the system development process, the original vehicle was employed to evaluate thermal difference between the original engine testing platform and vehicle. Figures5 and 6 present experimentally measured temperature results for the original vehicle with different velocities before resulting in a stalling engine. Figure 5 shows that the vehicle drives 40 km/hr before stall; the maximum temperature increases up to 214°C when the vehicle stalls after 6 minutes. After stalling for 69 minutes, the inlet and outlet coolant temperatures of T/C are decreased to 100°C and 125°C, respectively.Figure 5
Original vehicle moving with a speed of 40 km/hr before stall.Figure 6
Original vehicle moving with a speed of 120 km/hr before stall.If the vehicle is moving at a speed of 120 km/hr before stall, the maximum temperature is increased to 222°C when vehicle stalls after 6 minutes, as shown in Figure6. After stalling for 73 minutes, the coolant inlet and outlet temperatures of T/C drop to 100°C and 125°C, respectively.After comparing the experimental results in the case of the original vehicle with the results of engine one, both experimental results show they have similar maximum temperature and trend characteristics. Thus, the results obtained on the engine testing platform can be used to represent the vehicle one.


## 3.1. Original Engine

The experimental results of the original engine are shown in Figure4. The maximum coolant outlet temperature of T/C closes to 225°C when engine stalls after 5 minutes after running. After engine stalls for 41 minutes, the inlet and outlet coolant temperatures of T/C are decreased to 100°C and 125°C, respectively, since the measured temperature of original engine exceeds 225°C, which may damage a turbocharger’s bearings, as well as oil qualities.Figure 4
Experimental results of T/C temperatures for the original engine.


## 3.2. Original Vehicle

In order to simplify the system development process, the original vehicle was employed to evaluate thermal difference between the original engine testing platform and vehicle. Figures5 and 6 present experimentally measured temperature results for the original vehicle with different velocities before resulting in a stalling engine. Figure 5 shows that the vehicle drives 40 km/hr before stall; the maximum temperature increases up to 214°C when the vehicle stalls after 6 minutes. After stalling for 69 minutes, the inlet and outlet coolant temperatures of T/C are decreased to 100°C and 125°C, respectively.Figure 5
Original vehicle moving with a speed of 40 km/hr before stall.Figure 6
Original vehicle moving with a speed of 120 km/hr before stall.If the vehicle is moving at a speed of 120 km/hr before stall, the maximum temperature is increased to 222°C when vehicle stalls after 6 minutes, as shown in Figure6. After stalling for 73 minutes, the coolant inlet and outlet temperatures of T/C drop to 100°C and 125°C, respectively.After comparing the experimental results in the case of the original vehicle with the results of engine one, both experimental results show they have similar maximum temperature and trend characteristics. Thus, the results obtained on the engine testing platform can be used to represent the vehicle one.


## 4. Experimental Results of Proposed Layout

### 4.1. Proposed Serial-Type Layout

Since the flow rate of serial-type EWP is limited because coolant inlet pipe diameter of turbocharger cannot be changed, different running time is employed to evaluate thermal characteristics. The flow rate of serial type adjusts using original engine one up to 840 L/H (liter/hour). Figure7 shows the experimental results of proposed serial-type layout while keeping EWP running. The tested engine stalls after the engine coolant outlet temperature has risen to 105°C; the proposed serial-type EWP starts running then. Since the liquid coolant mixtures of turbocharger can keep running using EWP, the system temperatures would increase, and coolant inlet temperature of turbocharger would dip below 100°C after 2 minutes.Figure 7
Proposed serial type with keep running.However, if the EWP is not kept running, the coolant outlet temperature of turbocharger would reincrease from 87°C to 101°C within 5 minutes after EWP stops running, as shown in Figure8. Moreover, if the running time was reduced to 10 minutes, the coolant outlet temperature of turbocharger would reincrease to 128°C within 3 minutes, as shown in Figure 9.Figure 8
Proposed serial type with a running time of 20 minutes.Figure 9
Proposed serial type with a running time of 10 minutes.


### 4.2. Proposed Parallel-Type Layout

For the parallel-type layout, because the liquid coolant mixtures directly come from radiator, the flow rate of EWP can be adjusted according to the following system requirements. The flow rates of 1080, 1200, 1380, and 1569 L/H with different running time were used to evaluate thermal characteristics. Figures10 and 11 show the experimental results of EWP with flow rate 1080 L/H and running time of 5 and 10 minutes, respectively. If the running time of EWP was set to be 5 minutes, the coolant outlet temperature of turbocharger would reincrease from 96°C to 134.8°C within 4 minutes. Once the running time increases to 10 minutes, the maximum coolant outlet temperature of turbocharger reduces to 117.5°C.Figure 10
Proposed parallel type with flow rate 1080 L/H and a running time of 5 minutes.Figure 11
Proposed parallel type with flow rate 1080 L/H and a running time of 10 minutes.If the flow rate increases to 1200 L/H, the experimental results of running time of 5, 7, and 10 minutes are shown in Figures12, 13, and 14, respectively. If the running time is 5 minutes (see Figure 12), the maximum coolant temperature would be 128.4°C, which is lower than the results in Figure 10 as the flow rate increases. Furthermore, if the running time increases to 7 or 10 minutes, the maximum temperature could reduce to 122.6°C and 111.9°C, as shown in Figures 13 and 14, respectively.Figure 12
Proposed parallel type with flow rate 1200 L/H and a running time of 5 minutes.Figure 13
Proposed parallel type with flow rate 1200 L/H and a running time of 7 minutes.Figure 14
Proposed parallel type with flow rate 1200 L/H and a running time of 10 minutes.If we further increase the flow rate to 1380 L/H and 1560 L/H and keep the running time of 5 minutes, in Figures15 and 16, the maximum coolant temperatures of 127.7°C and 128.6°C are similar.Figure 15
Proposed parallel type with flow rate 1380 L/H and a running time of 5 minutes.Figure 16
Proposed parallel type with flow rate 1560 L/H and a running time of 5 minutes.The comparison of different running time and flow rate for both parallel- and serial-type layouts are shown in Table4. The longer the running time is, the lower the maximum coolant temperature is. However, the maximum coolant temperature would not reduce by increasing the flow rate. The only effective flow rate would be in the cool-down duration when EWP is running. Besides, the higher flow rate would increase electricityconsumption. Thus, the optimal flow rate would be 1200 L/H, because it has lower maximum coolant temperature without higher electricity consumption. Moreover, if we compare the serial-type with parallel one using the same running time, the maximum temperature of serial-type layout is 128°C; it is significantly higher than that of the parallel one, even adopting the lowest flow rate.Table 4
Comparison of different running time and flow rate.
Flow rate
EWP running time (minute)
Outlet of T/C temperature
1080 L/H
5
134.8
7
—
10
117.5
1200 L/H
5
128.5
7
122.6
10
111.9
1380 L/H
5
127.7
7
—
10
—
1560 L/H
5
128.6
7
—
10
—


## 4.1. Proposed Serial-Type Layout

Since the flow rate of serial-type EWP is limited because coolant inlet pipe diameter of turbocharger cannot be changed, different running time is employed to evaluate thermal characteristics. The flow rate of serial type adjusts using original engine one up to 840 L/H (liter/hour). Figure7 shows the experimental results of proposed serial-type layout while keeping EWP running. The tested engine stalls after the engine coolant outlet temperature has risen to 105°C; the proposed serial-type EWP starts running then. Since the liquid coolant mixtures of turbocharger can keep running using EWP, the system temperatures would increase, and coolant inlet temperature of turbocharger would dip below 100°C after 2 minutes.Figure 7
Proposed serial type with keep running.However, if the EWP is not kept running, the coolant outlet temperature of turbocharger would reincrease from 87°C to 101°C within 5 minutes after EWP stops running, as shown in Figure8. Moreover, if the running time was reduced to 10 minutes, the coolant outlet temperature of turbocharger would reincrease to 128°C within 3 minutes, as shown in Figure 9.Figure 8
Proposed serial type with a running time of 20 minutes.Figure 9
Proposed serial type with a running time of 10 minutes.


## 4.2. Proposed Parallel-Type Layout

For the parallel-type layout, because the liquid coolant mixtures directly come from radiator, the flow rate of EWP can be adjusted according to the following system requirements. The flow rates of 1080, 1200, 1380, and 1569 L/H with different running time were used to evaluate thermal characteristics. Figures10 and 11 show the experimental results of EWP with flow rate 1080 L/H and running time of 5 and 10 minutes, respectively. If the running time of EWP was set to be 5 minutes, the coolant outlet temperature of turbocharger would reincrease from 96°C to 134.8°C within 4 minutes. Once the running time increases to 10 minutes, the maximum coolant outlet temperature of turbocharger reduces to 117.5°C.Figure 10
Proposed parallel type with flow rate 1080 L/H and a running time of 5 minutes.Figure 11
Proposed parallel type with flow rate 1080 L/H and a running time of 10 minutes.If the flow rate increases to 1200 L/H, the experimental results of running time of 5, 7, and 10 minutes are shown in Figures12, 13, and 14, respectively. If the running time is 5 minutes (see Figure 12), the maximum coolant temperature would be 128.4°C, which is lower than the results in Figure 10 as the flow rate increases. Furthermore, if the running time increases to 7 or 10 minutes, the maximum temperature could reduce to 122.6°C and 111.9°C, as shown in Figures 13 and 14, respectively.Figure 12
Proposed parallel type with flow rate 1200 L/H and a running time of 5 minutes.Figure 13
Proposed parallel type with flow rate 1200 L/H and a running time of 7 minutes.Figure 14
Proposed parallel type with flow rate 1200 L/H and a running time of 10 minutes.If we further increase the flow rate to 1380 L/H and 1560 L/H and keep the running time of 5 minutes, in Figures15 and 16, the maximum coolant temperatures of 127.7°C and 128.6°C are similar.Figure 15
Proposed parallel type with flow rate 1380 L/H and a running time of 5 minutes.Figure 16
Proposed parallel type with flow rate 1560 L/H and a running time of 5 minutes.The comparison of different running time and flow rate for both parallel- and serial-type layouts are shown in Table4. The longer the running time is, the lower the maximum coolant temperature is. However, the maximum coolant temperature would not reduce by increasing the flow rate. The only effective flow rate would be in the cool-down duration when EWP is running. Besides, the higher flow rate would increase electricityconsumption. Thus, the optimal flow rate would be 1200 L/H, because it has lower maximum coolant temperature without higher electricity consumption. Moreover, if we compare the serial-type with parallel one using the same running time, the maximum temperature of serial-type layout is 128°C; it is significantly higher than that of the parallel one, even adopting the lowest flow rate.Table 4
Comparison of different running time and flow rate.
Flow rate
EWP running time (minute)
Outlet of T/C temperature
1080 L/H
5
134.8
7
—
10
117.5
1200 L/H
5
128.5
7
122.6
10
111.9
1380 L/H
5
127.7
7
—
10
—
1560 L/H
5
128.6
7
—
10
—


## 5. Conclusion

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate thermal characteristic of turbocharger when engine stalls. The experimental results show that the maximum coolant temperature of turbocharger rises to 225°C, which may cause engine bearing and oil quality damage. Different EWP’s cooling layout types, which consist of serial and parallel types, are then implemented to reduce the maximum temperature. Firstly, an engine testing platform was established to evaluate thermal characteristics, and experimental results show that it can be used to represent the thermal characteristics of turbocharger in the actual vehicle. Different flow rates of 1080, 1200, 1380, and 1569 L/H, with different running time, were used to evaluate thermal characteristics of parallel-type. Due to the limitation of coolant inlet pipe diameter of turbocharger, the flow rate of serial-type EWP cannot be adjusted. The experimental results show that the running time of serial-type layout is the same with the Parallel, its maximum temperature is 128°C, and would be significantly higher than that of the parallel one, even using the lowest flow rate. Therefore, the proposed parallel-type layout shows the thermal characteristics of efficiency improvement. Furthermore, the experimental results of parallel-type show that the longer the running time is, the lower the maximum coolant temperature is. However, the maximum coolant temperature would not be affected by flow rate. The only effective flow rate would occur in the cool-down time when the EWP is running. Besides, the more flow rate would increase electricity consumption. Thus, the optimal flow rate would be 1200 L/H, because it has lower maximum coolant temperature without higher electricity consumption.



---

*Source: 498624-2014-08-27.xml*