# MiR-126-HMGB1-HIF-1 Axis Regulates Endothelial Cell Inflammation during Exposure to Hypoxia-Acidosis

Authors: Jinxue Liu; Eileen Wei; Jianqin Wei; Wei Zhou; Keith A. Webster; Bin Zhang; Dong Li; Gaoxing Zhang; Yidong Wei; Yusheng Long; Xiuyu Qi; Qianhuan Zhang; Dingli Xu
Journal: Disease Markers
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

Crosstalk between molecular regulators miR-126, hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1-α), and high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) contributes to the regulation of inflammation and angiogenesis in multiple physiological and pathophysiological settings. Here, we present evidence of an overriding role for miR-126 in the regulation of HMGB1 and its downstream proinflammatory effectors in endothelial cells subjected to hypoxia with concurrent acidosis (H/A). Methods. Primary mouse endothelial cells (PMEC) were exposed to hypoxia or H/A to simulate short or chronic low-flow ischemia, respectively. RT-qPCR quantified mRNA transcripts, and proteins were measured by western blot. ROS were quantified by fluorogenic ELISA and luciferase reporter assays employed to confirm an active miR-126 target in the HMGB1 3′UTR. Results. Enhanced expression of miR-126 in PMECs cultured under neutral hypoxia was suppressed under H/A, whereas the HMGB1 expression increased sequentially under both conditions. Enhanced expression of HMGB1 and downstream inflammation markers was blocked by the premiR-126 overexpression and optimized by antagomiR. Compared with neutral hypoxia, H/A suppressed the HIF-1α expression independently of miR-126. The results show that HMGB1 and downstream effectors are optimally induced by H/A relative to neutral hypoxia via crosstalk between hypoxia signaling, miR-126, and HIF-1α, whereas B-cell lymphoma 2(Bcl2), a HIF-1α, and miR-126 regulated gene expressed optimally under neutral hypoxia. Conclusion. Inflammatory responses of ECs to H/A are dynamically regulated by the combined actions of hypoxia, miR-126, and HIF-1α on the master regulator HMGB1. The findings may be relevant to vascular diseases including atherosclerotic occlusion and interiors of plaque where coexisting hypoxia and acidosis promote inflammation as a defining etiology.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

As integral vasoregulators, endothelial cells (ECs) serve as multifunctional biosensors that coordinate vascular responses to environmental stress of which hypoxia, oxidative stress, acidosis, and inflammation are especially prominent in myocardial disease and cancer [1–5]. By regulating EC survival, senescence, growth, invasion, glucose metabolism, and multiple molecular signaling pathways, hypoxia and HIF factor signaling are central to vascular EC responses to conditions of ischemia and downstream consequences of endothelial dysfunction, remodeling, and vascular disease [6–10]. Acidosis, an obligatory component of chronic ischemia caused by vessel occlusion, and present inside atherosclerotic plaque [11], is primarily driven by increased glycolysis and buildup of extracellular waste metabolites. Acidosis when combined with hypoxia additionally regulates and/or accentuates multiple aspects of the responses of ECs to ischemia, including survival, inflammation, and vessel tone and integrity via stress kinase signaling, calcium, and NO pathways [12–15]. Multiple microRNAs are known to modulate endothelial inflammatory responses [16] and established roles for miR-126 in regulating vascular integrity, angiogenesis, atherogenesis, and vessel functions that have been described [17–21].Although miR-126 has been widely studied in the context of cellular hypoxia [22–27], its role in ECs subjected to chronic ischemic and/or acidotic conditions is relatively unexplored. HIF-1α has been shown to induce the miR-126 expression in a number of cell types including cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells, and other studies have described positive feedback loop regulation between HIF-1α and miR-126 [26, 28, 29]. Consequently, HIF-1/miR-126 signaling is implicated in vasculogenesis and vascular disease, including proliferation, differentiation, migration, atherogenesis, senescence, and programmed cell death of vascular cells [30]. Inflammation is a fundamental cellular component of innate and adaptive immunity that, when deregulated is implicated in multiple cardiovascular pathologies, notably those that involve atherosclerosis, diabetes, obesity, hypertension, and responses to ischemia-reperfusion and myocardial infarction [31–33]. Acidosis occurs most frequently in association with sustained ischemia, inflammation, and metabolic disease where under the most severe conditions of ischemia, affected tissue pH can fall below 6.5 [12] and significantly impact basic physiological processes including immune responses, cell viability, angiogenesis, and localized inflammation [34–37].The high-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) is a secreted cytokine immunomodulator with central roles in autoimmune, infectious, and inflammatory pathologies especially related to cancer and cardiovascular disease. HMGB1 has been linked with angiogenesis, endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and atherosclerosis through its regulation of toll-like receptor 4 and inflammatory cytokine secretions [38–43]. HMGB1 is expressed in myocardial cells where it selectively binds chromatin and activates innate immune and inflammatory-related genes [44]. Recently, microRNAs including miR-126 have been shown to confer important regulation of HMGB1 [45–50]. Here, we identify a pH component in the regulation of HMGB1 with contextual targeting by miR-126 that constitutes a critical component of signal transmission in the EC response to conditions of chronic simulated ischemia and associated inflammation.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Reagents

Primary mouse aortic endothelial cells (PMEC) were from Cell Biologics. Antibodies were obtained from the following vendors: p-Akt, Akt, Bcl2, TNF-α, and NAPDH oxidase, from Cell Signaling Technology, and HMGB1 and NADPH from Abcam; human premicroRNA expression constructs, Lenti-PremiR-126 and Anti-miR-126 from System Bioscience LLC; OxiSelect ROS assay kit from Cell Biolabs; Lipofectamine 2000 reagent from Thermo Fisher Scientific; and Luc-Pair miR luciferase assay kit from GeneCopoeia.


### 2.2. Endothelial Cell Culture and Treatment

PMECs, plated at1×106 cells per ml, were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37°C. Our conditions for exposure to hypoxia (0.5% O2/5% CO2) are described in detail elsewhere [51–53]. Media was titrated with lactic acid to achieve a starting pH of 7.4±0.05 for hypoxia alone and 6.7±0.05 for hypoxia-acidosis (H/A), a moderately acidic pH for ischemic tissues within the range that can be caused by severely occluded myocardial tissue or within a tumor environment in vivo [54, 55]. Our H/A conditions are designed to mimic chronic low-flow ischemia caused by such severe occlusion as well as ECs within an atherosclerotic lesion where oxygen and ionic exchanges between vessels and the blood are restricted. Media for the H/A condition was replaced daily, and cultures were exposed to hypoxia for 24 h and H/A for 72 h to more closely mimic chronic ischemia. Previous studies by others and ourselves have documented that most cells including primary ECs respond rapidly to hypoxia with activation of HIF-1α within 8-12 h of exposure and minimal additional change of HIF-1 responses between 24 and 72 h [56–62]. Under these conditions, we found that media pH under either condition did not change significantly over 24 h. Extended times are also appropriate to mimic metabolic adaptations to simulated ischemia because of the vastly larger extracellular space of cultured ECs versus vascular ECs in vivo. In some incubations, cells were subjected to lentivirus infection using Lipofectamine 2000 before exposure to conditions.


### 2.3. Western Blot

Our procedures for western blots are described in detail elsewhere [51, 52]. Briefly, 30 μg of total protein per lane in loading buffer was separated by 12% SDS-PAGE gel and proteins transferred onto membranes. After blocking, primary antibodies (1 : 500 dilution) were incubated overnight at 4°C, followed by room temperature exposure to secondary antibodies (1 : 4000 dilution). Reactive bands were revealed by chemiluminescence.


### 2.4. RNA Analysis

For RNA quantification, total RNA was isolated from cells using TRIzol Reagent and subjected to real-time PCR using TaqMan probes (Applied Biosystems) as described previously [63]. All values are expressed relative to a mean expression value for the 22,000+ transcripts on each microarray.


### 2.5. Measurement of ROS

ROS were measured using an OxiSelect ROS assay kit, exactly as described by the manufacturer and as previously reported [64].


### 2.6. Luciferase Reporter Assay

Luciferase assays were performed on cell extracts as previously described [65] using a Luc-Pair miR luciferase assay kit (GeneCoepia). Relative luciferase activities are expressed as luminescence units normalized to Renilla luciferase activity. Luminescence was quantitated using a multimode microplate reader (BMG Labtech).


### 2.7. Quantitative RT-PCR

The MiR-126 expression was quantified using a quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay from Ambion described previously [66]. Briefly, PCR reactions were carried out in triplicate in a 25 μl volume using SYBR Green Assay Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) for 3 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s in a Bio-Rad I Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Micro-RNA primers were used as follows: miR-126 forward, 5′-TATAAGATCTGAGGATAGGTGGGTTCCCGAGAACT-3′, reverse, 5′-ATATGAATTCTCTCAGGGCTATGCCGCCTAAGTAC-3′; HMGB1 forward, 5′-TATGGCAAAAGCGGACAAGG-3′, reverse, 5′-CTTCGCAACATCACCAATGGA-3′; GAPDH forward, 5′-ACAACTTTGGTATCGTGGAAGG-3′, reverse, 5′-GCCATCACGCCACAGTTTC-3′; U6 forward 5′-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3′, reverse 5′-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3′. The relative gene expression was quantified using the 2−ΔΔCq method [67]. Three independent experiments were routinely performed for each assay.


### 2.8. Statistics

All data are expressed asmean±S.E.M. Statistical comparisons were performed using Graphpad Prism software (GraphPad Software Inc.), and Student’s t-test was used to compare differences.


## 2.1. Reagents

Primary mouse aortic endothelial cells (PMEC) were from Cell Biologics. Antibodies were obtained from the following vendors: p-Akt, Akt, Bcl2, TNF-α, and NAPDH oxidase, from Cell Signaling Technology, and HMGB1 and NADPH from Abcam; human premicroRNA expression constructs, Lenti-PremiR-126 and Anti-miR-126 from System Bioscience LLC; OxiSelect ROS assay kit from Cell Biolabs; Lipofectamine 2000 reagent from Thermo Fisher Scientific; and Luc-Pair miR luciferase assay kit from GeneCopoeia.


## 2.2. Endothelial Cell Culture and Treatment

PMECs, plated at1×106 cells per ml, were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37°C. Our conditions for exposure to hypoxia (0.5% O2/5% CO2) are described in detail elsewhere [51–53]. Media was titrated with lactic acid to achieve a starting pH of 7.4±0.05 for hypoxia alone and 6.7±0.05 for hypoxia-acidosis (H/A), a moderately acidic pH for ischemic tissues within the range that can be caused by severely occluded myocardial tissue or within a tumor environment in vivo [54, 55]. Our H/A conditions are designed to mimic chronic low-flow ischemia caused by such severe occlusion as well as ECs within an atherosclerotic lesion where oxygen and ionic exchanges between vessels and the blood are restricted. Media for the H/A condition was replaced daily, and cultures were exposed to hypoxia for 24 h and H/A for 72 h to more closely mimic chronic ischemia. Previous studies by others and ourselves have documented that most cells including primary ECs respond rapidly to hypoxia with activation of HIF-1α within 8-12 h of exposure and minimal additional change of HIF-1 responses between 24 and 72 h [56–62]. Under these conditions, we found that media pH under either condition did not change significantly over 24 h. Extended times are also appropriate to mimic metabolic adaptations to simulated ischemia because of the vastly larger extracellular space of cultured ECs versus vascular ECs in vivo. In some incubations, cells were subjected to lentivirus infection using Lipofectamine 2000 before exposure to conditions.


## 2.3. Western Blot

Our procedures for western blots are described in detail elsewhere [51, 52]. Briefly, 30 μg of total protein per lane in loading buffer was separated by 12% SDS-PAGE gel and proteins transferred onto membranes. After blocking, primary antibodies (1 : 500 dilution) were incubated overnight at 4°C, followed by room temperature exposure to secondary antibodies (1 : 4000 dilution). Reactive bands were revealed by chemiluminescence.


## 2.4. RNA Analysis

For RNA quantification, total RNA was isolated from cells using TRIzol Reagent and subjected to real-time PCR using TaqMan probes (Applied Biosystems) as described previously [63]. All values are expressed relative to a mean expression value for the 22,000+ transcripts on each microarray.


## 2.5. Measurement of ROS

ROS were measured using an OxiSelect ROS assay kit, exactly as described by the manufacturer and as previously reported [64].


## 2.6. Luciferase Reporter Assay

Luciferase assays were performed on cell extracts as previously described [65] using a Luc-Pair miR luciferase assay kit (GeneCoepia). Relative luciferase activities are expressed as luminescence units normalized to Renilla luciferase activity. Luminescence was quantitated using a multimode microplate reader (BMG Labtech).


## 2.7. Quantitative RT-PCR

The MiR-126 expression was quantified using a quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay from Ambion described previously [66]. Briefly, PCR reactions were carried out in triplicate in a 25 μl volume using SYBR Green Assay Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) for 3 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s in a Bio-Rad I Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Micro-RNA primers were used as follows: miR-126 forward, 5′-TATAAGATCTGAGGATAGGTGGGTTCCCGAGAACT-3′, reverse, 5′-ATATGAATTCTCTCAGGGCTATGCCGCCTAAGTAC-3′; HMGB1 forward, 5′-TATGGCAAAAGCGGACAAGG-3′, reverse, 5′-CTTCGCAACATCACCAATGGA-3′; GAPDH forward, 5′-ACAACTTTGGTATCGTGGAAGG-3′, reverse, 5′-GCCATCACGCCACAGTTTC-3′; U6 forward 5′-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3′, reverse 5′-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3′. The relative gene expression was quantified using the 2−ΔΔCq method [67]. Three independent experiments were routinely performed for each assay.


## 2.8. Statistics

All data are expressed asmean±S.E.M. Statistical comparisons were performed using Graphpad Prism software (GraphPad Software Inc.), and Student’s t-test was used to compare differences.


## 3. Results

Suppression of hypoxia-induced miR-126 and HMGB1 by acidosis of PMECs: cultured PMECs were subjected to 24 h of hypoxia alone or 72 h hypoxia with concurrent acidosis and isolated RNAs and proteins quantified for expression of mir-126, HMGB1, and HIF-1α. As shown in Figure 1, hypoxia alone conferred increased expression of miR-126 and HMGB1-specific RNAs, respectively, by 12±2−fold and 2.1±0.1−fold (both p<0.01 relative to aerobic controls) and proteins HMGB1 and HIF-1α, respectively, by 1.85±0.1−fold and 3.6±0.2−fold (both p<0.01 relative to aerobic controls). When acidosis was present for 72 h with concurrent hypoxia, mir-126 levels were 4.1±0.05−fold relative to aerobic cells, a decline of 3-fold relative to hypoxia alone, whereas HMGB1 mRNA levels were further increased over pH neutral hypoxia to 3.2±0.15 of aerobic cell, an increase of 50% over neutral hypoxia. At the protein level, HMGB1 protein increased in parallel with the mRNA also to 3.2±0.1−fold relative to aerobic cells, whereas HIF-1 protein under H/A was 1.8±0.1−fold of aerobic cells, a 50% decline relative to neutral hypoxia. As discussed in Methods, previous work by others and ourselves has shown that HIF-1α accumulates rapidly when primary ECs are exposed to hypoxia, maximally within 4-8 h with no significant change between 24 and 72 h in most cases [56, 57, 61]. The results indicate positive regulation of all 3 RNA/gene targets by hypoxia and quenching of miR-126 and HIF-1α by concurrent acidosis, but enhanced expression of HMGB1 by H/A.Figure 1
Quantification of responses of miR-126, HMGB1, and HIF-1α to hypoxia and H/A in PMECs. MiR-126 and HMGB1 RNAs were measured by RT-PCR (a, b) and Western blot (c)–(e). Results are expressed as mean±SEM. ∗∗p<0.01, ∗p<0.05. Hy-24 h and HA-72 h: PMECs were exposed to hypoxia for 24 hours or H/A for 72 hours. Results are expressed as mean±SEM. ∗∗p<0.01; ∗p<0.05; n=4.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)


### 3.1. Inflammatory Indicators, Increased under Hypoxia, Are Enhanced by HA

HMGB1 is a secreted immune-inflammatory protein expressed in many cell types, that acts as a damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) factor [68] and can induce signaling pathways by binding to immune modulators such as advanced glycation end products (RAGE) and toll-like receptors (TLRs) [69, 70], thereby stimulating inflammatory cascade. To investigate functional consequences of HMGB1 induction by hypoxia in the presence and absence of acidosis, we assayed putative downstream inflammatory effectors of HMGB1 including ROS, NADPH, and TNF-α, as well as survival signaling pathway intermediates p-Akt and Bcl-2. As shown in Figure 2, ROS production, TNF-α, and NAPDH expression were significantly increased by both hypoxia alone and hypoxia-acidosis (p<0.01), in a manner that paralleled closely the expression patters of HMGB1. P-Akt, a marker of survival kinases, was also significantly induced by both experimental manipulations while prosurvival, antiapoptosis marker Bcl2 was increased by both hypoxia and hypoxia-acidosis but more markedly by the former (all p<0.01). The results are consistent with positive and regulation of HMGB1 and its downstream inflammatory effectors by hypoxia that is incrementally enhanced by concurrent acidosis.Figure 2
Responses of markers of inflammation, Akt, and Bcl2 during exposure of PMECs to 24 h hypoxia (Hy) and 72 h H/A. ECs were infected with premiR-126 or antagomiR-126 and cultured under the specified conditions. (a) ROS were quantified using an OxiSelect ROS assay kit. (b)–(f) Western blots quantified TNFα, p-Akt, and Bcl2. Results are expressed as mean±SEM. ∗∗p<0.01; ∗p<0.05; n=4.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


### 3.2. Contextual Regulation of the HMGB1 Expression by miR-126 Modulators

It was reported that the HMGB1 gene contains a 3′UTR target for miR-126 and that elevated miR-126 downregulated HMGB1 and suppressed inflammatory responses of ECs during exposure to hyperglycemia [50]. Because the actions of miR-126 are context-dependent and can mediate positive or negative actions on gene expression depending on the prevailing environments [21], we asked whether miR-126 contributes to the incremental regulation of HMGB1 gene expression by hypoxia-acidosis. To do this, PMECs were transfected with optimal doses of miR-126 premiR or antagomir RNAs and the expression of HMGB1 and HIF-1α measured after exposure to H/A for 72 h as described in Methods. As shown in Figure 3, ECs pretransfected with the miR-126 mimic displayed robust expression of miR-126 relative to controls, whereas the expression in antagomir-transfected cells was reduced by about 50% of control nontransfected cells (Figure 3(a)). Despite the high expression of apparent miR-126 conferred by overexpression of the mimic, levels of HMGB1 mRNA remained unchanged relative to nontransfected control cells; perhaps, an indication that elevated basal miR-126 under hypoxia-acidosis alone is sufficient to convey significant degradation of HMGB1 mRNA. Conversely, the overexpression of the antagomir conferred almost 6-fold increased expression of HMGB1 mRNA; again, consistent with the possibility that endogenous miR-126 actively promotes degradation of HMGB1 mRNA expression under hypoxia-acidosis. Protein expression analyses supported such an interpretation that miR-126 regulates the HMGB1 gene expression during exposure to hypoxia-acidosis by promoting mRNA degradation and suppressing translation. As shown in Figures 3(c) and 3(d), the overexpression of the miR-126 mimic significantly blocked HMGB1 protein expression (p<0.01), whereas the antagomir overexpression conferred >10-fold increased protein expression relative to control conditions. As a control, and to ensure that the results are not influenced by an indirect interference of miR-126 on HIF-1α, we demonstrate in Figure 3(e) that HIF-1α protein levels, increased under hypoxia-acidosis, were not affected by miR-126 mimic or antagomir overexpression in these ECs. The results demonstrate that decreasing miR-126 levels by transfection of an antagomiR prior to exposure to hypoxia-acidosis conferred markedly increased expression of HMGB1 mRNA and protein consistent with a classical miR-mediated targeting of the HMGB1 gene to induce mRNA degradation and translational repression [71]. This interpretation is also supported by the effects of the overexpression of the miR-126 mimic, although relatively minor compared with the antagomir. Both effects suggest significant regulation of the HMGB1 gene expression by endogenous miR-126 under hypoxia-acidosis.Figure 3
PremiR and antagomir regulation of miR-126 expression and downstream responses of HMGB1 and HIF-1α in PMECs during H/A culture. PMECs were infected with premiR-126 (OE) or anti-miR-126 (KD) and cultured under H/A. (a, b) miR-126 and HMGB1 RNAs were measured by RT-PCR. (c)–(e) western blots quantified and HIF-1α. Results are expressed as mean±SEM. ∗∗p<0.01. Cont-OE and Cont-KD refer to control (empty) vectors for the respective experimental premiR and antagomir overexpression groups. Results are expressed as mean±SEM. ∗∗p<0.01; ∗p<0.01; n=4.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)


### 3.3. Confirmation of a Hypoxia-Acidosis Regulable miR-126 Target Site on the HMGB1 Gene 3′UTR

To confirm that miR-126 can directly regulate the HMGB1 gene expression, we synthesized oligonucleotides containing putative wild type and mutant HMGB1-miR-126 binding sites and inserted them upstream of the Luciferase reporter gene as described in Methods (Figure4(a)). Plasmids were transfected into PMECs with nontransfected cells as controls and subjected to conditions of hypoxia-acidosis (Figures 4(b) and 4(c)). We first confirmed that the overexpression of the premiR-126 conferred decreased expression of HMGB1, whereas knockdown by the antagomir conferred increased expression, as expected from results shown in Figures 1 and 3 (data not shown). Luciferase reporter gene assays revealed that luciferase activity was significantly decreased or enhanced, respectively, by premiR-126 or antagomiR-126, when compared with controls (p<0.01). Importantly, the expression of an HMGB1 reporter plasmid that contained a mutated 3′UTR reporter gene was unaffected by either premiR-126 or antagomir (p>0.5) (Figures 5(b) and 5(c)). These results confirm that miR-126 targets the HMGB1 gene expression through a 3′ UAAUAAUU target site and its regulation by H/A.Figure 4
Context-dependent targeting of HMGB1 by miR-126. MirR-126 seed sequence and complementary binding site in the HMGB1 3′UTR are highlighted (a). PMECs were untreated or transfected with premiR-126 or antagomiR-126. Luciferase activities were quantified after subjection of cultures to H/A. Results are expressed as mean±SEM. ∗∗p<0.01; n=4. Cont-WT-HMGB1: control (empty) vector for WT- HMGB1; OE-WT-HMGB1: overexpression of premiR-126 for WT HMGB1; Cont-Mut-HMGB1: control (empty) vector for mutant HMGB1; OE-Mut-HMGB1: overexpression of premiR-126 for mutant HMGB1; KD-WT-HMGB1: antagomiR-126 for WT-HMGB1; KD-Mut-HMGB1: antagomiR-126 for mutant HMGB1.
(a)(b)(c)Figure 5
Attenuation of inflammatory markers in PMECs by miR-126 during H/A. ECs were infected with premiR-126 or antagomiR-126 and cultured under H/A. miR-126 RNA was measured using RT-PCR (a) ROS were measured using an OxiSelect ROS assay kit (b) Western blot analyses were performed to quantify TNFα, Akt, and Bcl2. (c)–(h) Results are expressed as mean±SEM. ∗∗p<0.01, ∗p<0.01. Cont-Air-OE, Hy-24 h-OE, and HA-72 h-OE: ECs were transfected with empty vector or premiR-126 and treated aerobically. Hypoxia 24 h or H/A 72 h. Cont-Air-KD, Hy-24 h-KD, and HA-72 h-KD: ECs were transfected with control vector or antagomiR-126 and treated aerobically. Hypoxia 24 h and H/A 72 h.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)


### 3.4. Predominant Role for miR-126 in the Regulation of Inflammation Markers by Hypoxia and H/A

To investigate possible individual roles of hypoxia, acidosis, HIF-1a, and the apparent overriding actions of miR-126 in regulating the HMGB1-responsive inflammatroy cascade, MPECs were pretransfected with miR-126 premiR or antagomiR, subjected to conditions of hypoxia alone or H/A and expression of inflammatory and cell survival markers measured and compared with aerobic controls as described in Methods and Figure3. Relative intracellular levels of miR-126 after transfection of antagomiR or antagomiR and subjection to conditions are shown in Figure 5(a). Compared with antagomiR-overexpressing control aerobic incubations, exposure of transfected cells to hypoxia conferred increased miR-126 of 5.3±0.3−fold, that decreased to 3.4±0.02−fold under H/A. In antagomiR-transfected cells, miR-126 levels under hypoxic incubations were increased by 2.5±0.2−fold over aerobic controls and by 1.6±0.1−fold under H/A. The expression of inflammation markers, ROS, NADPH oxidase, TNFα, and survival kinase p-Akt displayed trends that are consistent with the results of Figure 3 and supports a major role for miR-126 in suppression of the EC inflammatory response via HMGB1 under conditions of hypoxia and especially H/A. The expressed levels of all proteins from cells incubated under hypoxia alone or H/A were the lowest when miR-126 was induced (Figures 5(b) and 5(d)–5(f), OE columns 2-3), and, conversely, the highest when miR-126 was reduced (Figures 5(b) and 5(d)–5(f), KD columns 5-6) consistent with an overriding role for miR-126 in the regulation and suppression by acidosis as a major component of inflammatory pathway regulation during H/A. Levels of the antiapoptosis survival protein Bcl2, induced under hypoxia, were further induced by H/A in the presence of miR-129 KD and low miR-129, consistent with the suppressive role for the miR-126 in Bcl2 gene expression [72, 73]. In agreement with the results shown in Figures 1 and 3, HIF-1α induction by hypoxia was reduced under the H/A condition and unaffected by OE or KD of miR-126 premiR (OE) or antagomiR (KD).


## 3.1. Inflammatory Indicators, Increased under Hypoxia, Are Enhanced by HA

HMGB1 is a secreted immune-inflammatory protein expressed in many cell types, that acts as a damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) factor [68] and can induce signaling pathways by binding to immune modulators such as advanced glycation end products (RAGE) and toll-like receptors (TLRs) [69, 70], thereby stimulating inflammatory cascade. To investigate functional consequences of HMGB1 induction by hypoxia in the presence and absence of acidosis, we assayed putative downstream inflammatory effectors of HMGB1 including ROS, NADPH, and TNF-α, as well as survival signaling pathway intermediates p-Akt and Bcl-2. As shown in Figure 2, ROS production, TNF-α, and NAPDH expression were significantly increased by both hypoxia alone and hypoxia-acidosis (p<0.01), in a manner that paralleled closely the expression patters of HMGB1. P-Akt, a marker of survival kinases, was also significantly induced by both experimental manipulations while prosurvival, antiapoptosis marker Bcl2 was increased by both hypoxia and hypoxia-acidosis but more markedly by the former (all p<0.01). The results are consistent with positive and regulation of HMGB1 and its downstream inflammatory effectors by hypoxia that is incrementally enhanced by concurrent acidosis.Figure 2
Responses of markers of inflammation, Akt, and Bcl2 during exposure of PMECs to 24 h hypoxia (Hy) and 72 h H/A. ECs were infected with premiR-126 or antagomiR-126 and cultured under the specified conditions. (a) ROS were quantified using an OxiSelect ROS assay kit. (b)–(f) Western blots quantified TNFα, p-Akt, and Bcl2. Results are expressed as mean±SEM. ∗∗p<0.01; ∗p<0.05; n=4.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


## 3.2. Contextual Regulation of the HMGB1 Expression by miR-126 Modulators

It was reported that the HMGB1 gene contains a 3′UTR target for miR-126 and that elevated miR-126 downregulated HMGB1 and suppressed inflammatory responses of ECs during exposure to hyperglycemia [50]. Because the actions of miR-126 are context-dependent and can mediate positive or negative actions on gene expression depending on the prevailing environments [21], we asked whether miR-126 contributes to the incremental regulation of HMGB1 gene expression by hypoxia-acidosis. To do this, PMECs were transfected with optimal doses of miR-126 premiR or antagomir RNAs and the expression of HMGB1 and HIF-1α measured after exposure to H/A for 72 h as described in Methods. As shown in Figure 3, ECs pretransfected with the miR-126 mimic displayed robust expression of miR-126 relative to controls, whereas the expression in antagomir-transfected cells was reduced by about 50% of control nontransfected cells (Figure 3(a)). Despite the high expression of apparent miR-126 conferred by overexpression of the mimic, levels of HMGB1 mRNA remained unchanged relative to nontransfected control cells; perhaps, an indication that elevated basal miR-126 under hypoxia-acidosis alone is sufficient to convey significant degradation of HMGB1 mRNA. Conversely, the overexpression of the antagomir conferred almost 6-fold increased expression of HMGB1 mRNA; again, consistent with the possibility that endogenous miR-126 actively promotes degradation of HMGB1 mRNA expression under hypoxia-acidosis. Protein expression analyses supported such an interpretation that miR-126 regulates the HMGB1 gene expression during exposure to hypoxia-acidosis by promoting mRNA degradation and suppressing translation. As shown in Figures 3(c) and 3(d), the overexpression of the miR-126 mimic significantly blocked HMGB1 protein expression (p<0.01), whereas the antagomir overexpression conferred >10-fold increased protein expression relative to control conditions. As a control, and to ensure that the results are not influenced by an indirect interference of miR-126 on HIF-1α, we demonstrate in Figure 3(e) that HIF-1α protein levels, increased under hypoxia-acidosis, were not affected by miR-126 mimic or antagomir overexpression in these ECs. The results demonstrate that decreasing miR-126 levels by transfection of an antagomiR prior to exposure to hypoxia-acidosis conferred markedly increased expression of HMGB1 mRNA and protein consistent with a classical miR-mediated targeting of the HMGB1 gene to induce mRNA degradation and translational repression [71]. This interpretation is also supported by the effects of the overexpression of the miR-126 mimic, although relatively minor compared with the antagomir. Both effects suggest significant regulation of the HMGB1 gene expression by endogenous miR-126 under hypoxia-acidosis.Figure 3
PremiR and antagomir regulation of miR-126 expression and downstream responses of HMGB1 and HIF-1α in PMECs during H/A culture. PMECs were infected with premiR-126 (OE) or anti-miR-126 (KD) and cultured under H/A. (a, b) miR-126 and HMGB1 RNAs were measured by RT-PCR. (c)–(e) western blots quantified and HIF-1α. Results are expressed as mean±SEM. ∗∗p<0.01. Cont-OE and Cont-KD refer to control (empty) vectors for the respective experimental premiR and antagomir overexpression groups. Results are expressed as mean±SEM. ∗∗p<0.01; ∗p<0.01; n=4.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)


## 3.3. Confirmation of a Hypoxia-Acidosis Regulable miR-126 Target Site on the HMGB1 Gene 3′UTR

To confirm that miR-126 can directly regulate the HMGB1 gene expression, we synthesized oligonucleotides containing putative wild type and mutant HMGB1-miR-126 binding sites and inserted them upstream of the Luciferase reporter gene as described in Methods (Figure4(a)). Plasmids were transfected into PMECs with nontransfected cells as controls and subjected to conditions of hypoxia-acidosis (Figures 4(b) and 4(c)). We first confirmed that the overexpression of the premiR-126 conferred decreased expression of HMGB1, whereas knockdown by the antagomir conferred increased expression, as expected from results shown in Figures 1 and 3 (data not shown). Luciferase reporter gene assays revealed that luciferase activity was significantly decreased or enhanced, respectively, by premiR-126 or antagomiR-126, when compared with controls (p<0.01). Importantly, the expression of an HMGB1 reporter plasmid that contained a mutated 3′UTR reporter gene was unaffected by either premiR-126 or antagomir (p>0.5) (Figures 5(b) and 5(c)). These results confirm that miR-126 targets the HMGB1 gene expression through a 3′ UAAUAAUU target site and its regulation by H/A.Figure 4
Context-dependent targeting of HMGB1 by miR-126. MirR-126 seed sequence and complementary binding site in the HMGB1 3′UTR are highlighted (a). PMECs were untreated or transfected with premiR-126 or antagomiR-126. Luciferase activities were quantified after subjection of cultures to H/A. Results are expressed as mean±SEM. ∗∗p<0.01; n=4. Cont-WT-HMGB1: control (empty) vector for WT- HMGB1; OE-WT-HMGB1: overexpression of premiR-126 for WT HMGB1; Cont-Mut-HMGB1: control (empty) vector for mutant HMGB1; OE-Mut-HMGB1: overexpression of premiR-126 for mutant HMGB1; KD-WT-HMGB1: antagomiR-126 for WT-HMGB1; KD-Mut-HMGB1: antagomiR-126 for mutant HMGB1.
(a)(b)(c)Figure 5
Attenuation of inflammatory markers in PMECs by miR-126 during H/A. ECs were infected with premiR-126 or antagomiR-126 and cultured under H/A. miR-126 RNA was measured using RT-PCR (a) ROS were measured using an OxiSelect ROS assay kit (b) Western blot analyses were performed to quantify TNFα, Akt, and Bcl2. (c)–(h) Results are expressed as mean±SEM. ∗∗p<0.01, ∗p<0.01. Cont-Air-OE, Hy-24 h-OE, and HA-72 h-OE: ECs were transfected with empty vector or premiR-126 and treated aerobically. Hypoxia 24 h or H/A 72 h. Cont-Air-KD, Hy-24 h-KD, and HA-72 h-KD: ECs were transfected with control vector or antagomiR-126 and treated aerobically. Hypoxia 24 h and H/A 72 h.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)


## 3.4. Predominant Role for miR-126 in the Regulation of Inflammation Markers by Hypoxia and H/A

To investigate possible individual roles of hypoxia, acidosis, HIF-1a, and the apparent overriding actions of miR-126 in regulating the HMGB1-responsive inflammatroy cascade, MPECs were pretransfected with miR-126 premiR or antagomiR, subjected to conditions of hypoxia alone or H/A and expression of inflammatory and cell survival markers measured and compared with aerobic controls as described in Methods and Figure3. Relative intracellular levels of miR-126 after transfection of antagomiR or antagomiR and subjection to conditions are shown in Figure 5(a). Compared with antagomiR-overexpressing control aerobic incubations, exposure of transfected cells to hypoxia conferred increased miR-126 of 5.3±0.3−fold, that decreased to 3.4±0.02−fold under H/A. In antagomiR-transfected cells, miR-126 levels under hypoxic incubations were increased by 2.5±0.2−fold over aerobic controls and by 1.6±0.1−fold under H/A. The expression of inflammation markers, ROS, NADPH oxidase, TNFα, and survival kinase p-Akt displayed trends that are consistent with the results of Figure 3 and supports a major role for miR-126 in suppression of the EC inflammatory response via HMGB1 under conditions of hypoxia and especially H/A. The expressed levels of all proteins from cells incubated under hypoxia alone or H/A were the lowest when miR-126 was induced (Figures 5(b) and 5(d)–5(f), OE columns 2-3), and, conversely, the highest when miR-126 was reduced (Figures 5(b) and 5(d)–5(f), KD columns 5-6) consistent with an overriding role for miR-126 in the regulation and suppression by acidosis as a major component of inflammatory pathway regulation during H/A. Levels of the antiapoptosis survival protein Bcl2, induced under hypoxia, were further induced by H/A in the presence of miR-129 KD and low miR-129, consistent with the suppressive role for the miR-126 in Bcl2 gene expression [72, 73]. In agreement with the results shown in Figures 1 and 3, HIF-1α induction by hypoxia was reduced under the H/A condition and unaffected by OE or KD of miR-126 premiR (OE) or antagomiR (KD).


## 4. Discussion

We provide novel evidence for a dominant role of the miR-126 suppression by acidosis in the regulation of the HMGB1 gene expression and its downstream inflammation mediators in endothelial cells subjected to simulated chronic ischemia. The regulation is transmitted via a contextually responsive miR-126 target in the HMGB1 3′UTR. We also describe enhanced activation of the prosurvival, antiapoptosis protein Bcl2 by H/A via a slightly divergent signaling pathway that involves a quantitative antagonism between miR-126 and HIF-1α, whereas previous reports have documented negative regulation of both HMGB1 and Bcl2 by miR-126, and the present study is the first to describe acidosis as a driving force behind such regulation in the context of ischemia. Our findings that miR-126 levels increased 12-fold under pH-neutral hypoxia in parallel with a 3.5-fold increase of HIF-1α (Figures 1(a) and 1(e)) are consistent with previous reports that miR-126 is positively regulated by HIF-1α [26, 28, 29]. Previous work has also shown that HIF-1α can regulate micro-RNAs directly by binding to HRE-motifs in the 5′ upstream sequences of host genes [74], or indirectly by regulating the activities of associated signal intermediates, for example, c-Myc [75]. We found that the incremental increase of miR-126 supported by neutral hypoxia was reduced >70% under H/A, coincident with a similar >70% loss of the HIF1-α expression (Figures 1(a) and 1(e)), in parallel with a significant 50% augmentation of the HMGB1 expression under H/A relative to neutral hypoxia (p<0.01). The results support an indirect role for HIF-1α in the regulation of HMBG1 via downregulation of miR-126. In contrast, the Bcl2 expression, optimally activated by neutral hypoxia, was reduced under H/A (Figures 1(a) and 2(f)), most likely due to the opposing effects of coincident downregulated HIF-1α and suppressed miR-126 under H/A (see illustration, Figure 6).Figure 6
Schematic of crosstalk regulation of HMGB1, Akt, and Bcl2 expression and downstream inflammation mediators during exposure of PMECs to simulated ischemia. Acidosis is usually associated with severe, sustained ischemia when metabolic waste products including lactic acid accumulate within ischemic tissues. Hypoxia with or without acidosis rapidly activates HIF pathways, and miR-126 is induced in parallel with accumulated nuclear HIF-1α that increases the HMGB1 expression independently of HIF via YAP/HIPPO signaling, an effect that is retained under H/A (dashed line). By activating the PI3K/Akt pathway, HMGB1 also indirectly increases the HIF-1α expression in a hypoxia-HMGB1-HIF amplifying loop. HIF-1α directly and positively upregulates Bcl2, an effect that is countered via negative regulation by miR-126. During H/A, HIF-1a and miR-126 both decrease at least in part because acidosis blocks HIF-1α, the principal pathway for hypoxia-mediated transcriptional induction of miR-126. Reduced miR-126 during H/A relieves negative regulation on HMGB1 while the positive regulation by hypoxia is retained resulting in optimal activation of HMGB1 and its downstream inflammatory intermediates by H/A. In contrast because Bcl2 is positively regulated by HIF-1α and negatively regulated by miR-126, the optimal expression occurs under neutral hypoxia when HIF-1α is most active and predominates over miR-126.Results of premiR/antagomiR transfections confirmed the potent regulation of the HMGB1 gene expression by miR-126 during exposure to H/A (Figure3). The HMBG1 expression was low in cells transfected with premiRs and maximally induced by antagomir (Figure 3(e) columns 2 and 4), whereas HIF-1α was unresponsive to premiR/anti-miR-modulated expression of miR-126 (Figure 3(e)). Cotransfection of PMECs with miR-126 premiR, antagomiR, and expression vectors directing expression of Luciferase by 5′ wild type or mutated miR-126 target sites confirmed an miR-126 target sequence in the HMGB1 3′UTR, as previously reported [50] and its responsiveness to H/A. Luciferase activity was differentially regulated by a factor>5−fold by WT premiR over antagomiR in transfected cells exposed to H/A (p<0.01), and the regulation was eliminated by mutation of the site (Figure 4(b)). These results confirm the presence of a pH-regulable miR-126 target on the HMGB1 3′UTR.The expression levels of HMGB1-regulated inflammation markers in transfected cells subjected to conditions of hypoxia and H/A followed patterns that are consistent with positive and negative regulation by hypoxia and miR-126, respectively (Figures4(b)–4(e)). The HMGB1 gene is positively regulated by hypoxia through PI3K and YAP/Hippo pathways, that are independent of HIF-1α, and HMGB1 positively regulates the expression of HIF-1α [76–81]. Consistent with this, the inflammatory marker expression was only partially eliminated by miR-126 premiR transfection (OE) of cells under neutral hypoxia, compared with aerobic cells (Figures 4(b)–4(e), columns 1, 2, and 4), and the highest levels of inflammatory marker expression were seen in antagomiR expressing cells under H/A, a condition that drives maximal suppression of miR-126, sustained hypoxia, and reduced HIF-1α. It is noteworthy that Bcl2 expression, dually regulated in an antagonistic manner by HIF-1α and miR-126, was increased under H/A compared with neutral hypoxia only in antagomir-transfected cells (compare Figures 2(f) and 4(g)), despite lower HIF-1α (Figure 4(h)), suggesting an overriding role for miR-126 vs. HIF-1α in Bcl2 regulation under these conditions of simulated ischemia.Taken together, the results support the scheme depicted in Figure6. Neutral hypoxia increases miR-126 by HIF-1α dependent and independent pathways, and this induction is largely reversed by H/A. HMGB1, its downstream inflammatory markers and Akt, induced by neutral hypoxia, is super induced by HA due to H/A suppression of inhibitory miR-126 and sustained regulation by hypoxia via YAP/Hippo signaling. Repression of HIF-1α activity by H/A may be partially alleviated in this condition via positive feedback regulation by HMGB1, as well as positive regulation by miR-126 under some circumstances. Survival, antiapoptosis factor Bcl2 is directly regulated by HIF-1α and negatively regulated by miR-126; therefore, the relative levels of these regulators determine the Bcl2 expression. Consequently, neutral hypoxia conferred higher expression of Bcl2 than H/A, but H/A in the presence of miR-126 antagomiR conferred the greatest level of the Bcl2 expression.The studies are relevant to inflammation involving the endothelium, especially during cardiovascular disease and rapidly growing tumors wherein microenvironments of hypoxia and acidosis are common [12–16, 82]. Previous work has also shown that proinflammatory factors are increased by an acidotic extracellular environment with or without hypoxia [83, 84]. Development of inflammation during sever chronic ischemia in both conditions is exacerbated by acidic pH as well as by the underlying hypoxia. Such changes interfere with a wide range of immunological functions conferring increased levels of inflammatory cytokines, interleukin IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α, NADPH oxidase, and ROS [12, 82, 85].In addition to targeting HMGB1, a key driver of inflammatory and immune responses in numerous disease settings [86–89], miR-126 can target multiple other disease-associated genes of relevance to this study, including angiogenesis-related vascular endothelial growth factor A, sprouty-related protein-1, phosphoinositidol-3 kinase regulatory subunit-2 1, and the adapter molecule crk [90–92]. Our discovery that acidosis exerts marked control over HMBG1 and Bcl2 expression as well as downstream inflammation responders and Akt, via miR-126 and HIF-1α (summarized in Figure 6), in the context of chronic ischemia is novel and represents important additions to our understanding of vascular inflammation and cell survival during ischemic disease, including atherosclerosis and vasculatures of solid tumors, wherein hypoxia and acidosis are integral disease components.


### 4.1. Study Limitations

Our results support an overriding role for miR-126 in optimally inducing expression of the HMGB1 gene and its downstream mediators of inflammation and oxidative stress during exposure to conditions of chronic simulated ischemia in cultured endothelial cells. The proposed mechanism involves acidosis-mediated suppression of HIF-1α activity and consequential blocking of hypoxia-induced transcription of the miR-126 host genes, thereby blocking HMGB1 suppression by mir-126. We acknowledge that the relation of HIF-1α with miR-126 is correlative, and we do not yet have a mechanism; however, the results are consistent with other reports that have described HIF-1α regulation of miR-126 in endothelial cells [26, 28, 29]. Also, we do not know the mechanism of acidosis regulation of HIF-1α; indeed, early literature has documented positive regulation of the HIF pathway by driving nuclear sequestration of the VLH factor [93]. Our unique conditions of chronic H/A may account for the differences. Finally, our use of a prolonged 72 h exposure time for H/A to more closely simulate chronic ischemia with acidosis introduces another variable. We contend that the comparison with 24 h neutral hypoxia is valid at least in part because previous reports by others and ourselves have shown that the HIF pathway of cultured endothelial cells responds rapidly to hypoxia, usually within 4-8 h, and is sustained without significant change during exposure times of 24 h through 72 h, and provided nutrients are replenished and media pH controlled, as is the case in our incubations [10, 56, 61, 62]. Except miRNA, other types of noncoding RNA may be associated with endothelial cell inflammation during exposure to H/A, including Piwi RNA [94] and circular RNA [95]. Further discussion is needed in future studies.


## 4.1. Study Limitations

Our results support an overriding role for miR-126 in optimally inducing expression of the HMGB1 gene and its downstream mediators of inflammation and oxidative stress during exposure to conditions of chronic simulated ischemia in cultured endothelial cells. The proposed mechanism involves acidosis-mediated suppression of HIF-1α activity and consequential blocking of hypoxia-induced transcription of the miR-126 host genes, thereby blocking HMGB1 suppression by mir-126. We acknowledge that the relation of HIF-1α with miR-126 is correlative, and we do not yet have a mechanism; however, the results are consistent with other reports that have described HIF-1α regulation of miR-126 in endothelial cells [26, 28, 29]. Also, we do not know the mechanism of acidosis regulation of HIF-1α; indeed, early literature has documented positive regulation of the HIF pathway by driving nuclear sequestration of the VLH factor [93]. Our unique conditions of chronic H/A may account for the differences. Finally, our use of a prolonged 72 h exposure time for H/A to more closely simulate chronic ischemia with acidosis introduces another variable. We contend that the comparison with 24 h neutral hypoxia is valid at least in part because previous reports by others and ourselves have shown that the HIF pathway of cultured endothelial cells responds rapidly to hypoxia, usually within 4-8 h, and is sustained without significant change during exposure times of 24 h through 72 h, and provided nutrients are replenished and media pH controlled, as is the case in our incubations [10, 56, 61, 62]. Except miRNA, other types of noncoding RNA may be associated with endothelial cell inflammation during exposure to H/A, including Piwi RNA [94] and circular RNA [95]. Further discussion is needed in future studies.



---

*Source: 4933194-2021-12-21.xml*