# The Framework of a Rural Pension System based on a Mutual Aid Network

Authors: Jingting Meng; Zaiguo Lin; Tao Wang
Journal: Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

At present, there is an increasingly serious phenomenon of rural aging and mutual support for the aged in China. Taking this as the background and opportunity, this paper discusses the feasibility and realization path of the further development of the rural mutual support model based on the results of the field investigation of the mutual support network, including the study of mutual support relationship and spatial network. This paper proposes to analyze the internal mechanism by sorting out the internal driving forces and potential resources of mutual assistance and to construct a framework of rural elderly support system that meets the requirements of the mutual care model for the elderly from the three dimensions of operation, function, and space. It provides a development idea for the study of the elderly support system in the same type of rural areas.


---

## Body

## 1. Research Background

“Getting old before getting rich” is a common living condition of the elderly in China. According toThe 2019 Revision of World Population Prospects released by the Population Division of the United Nations Secretariat, the number of people aged 60 and over in China is 249 million, accounting for 17.9% of the total population [1–3]. The issue of providing for the elderly in rural areas is particularly prominent, due to serious population outflow, scattered geographical distribution, limited economic and financial resources, the failure of supporting formal care services in rural areas, and other reasons [4–6].In 2020, “China’s No. 1 Central Document” pointed out that it is necessary to encourage rural areas to develop a model of mutual assistance for the aged, to build day care centers in various forms, and to improve care services for the disabled and severely disabled people [7–10]. The mode of mutual support for the elderly provides a platform to integrate social surplus labor resources, which is essentially a collection of mutual support relationship. At present, the research on supporting mutual assistance for the aged is mainly focused on the functional composition of facilities and architectural design and transformation [11–15]. However, there are few studies on how to comply with the basic social laws of mutual assistance and activate the relationship of mutual assistance. Based on the investigation and analysis of the phenomenon of mutual support for the aged in many villages in Zhejiang in recent years, this paper summarizes the internal mechanisms such as internal driving forces and potential resources under the mutual relationship network and attempts to build a suitable framework of a rural elderly support system [16–18].


## 2. Characteristics and Trends of the Rural Elderly Mutual Support Network

The typical “community voluntary grid mutual assistance” model in Shengzhou, Zhejiang Province, on the basis of the existing mutual aid resources conforms to the original social relations of the village and is more replicable and extensible in the countryside. Through the network thinking, this paper makes an in-depth study on the completeness, centrality, and evenness of the village mutual aid relationship network in this area, as well as the agglomeration, centrality, and homogeneity of the spatial network. It can be seen that the current rural mutual assistance and support network for the aged has undergone further development and changes on the basis of local social relations.


### 2.1. Analysis on the Characteristics of Mutual Assistance and Support Networks for the Aged

According to the main projects of daily mutual assistance activities in each village, this paper summarizes three kinds of mutual assistance activities with different scales and different functions. On this basis, the mutual aid network and the spatial network of neighborhood, natural village, and administrative village are drawn. The characteristics of the main networks are as follows:A mutual assistance relationship network mainly has two typical network configurations: annular centripetal type and tree centripetal type (Figures1 and 2). At the level of most small networks, the network structure demonstrates a circular centripetal trend, with one or several households as the core, and other members also develop mutual assistance. The small network structure has good completeness and low vulnerability. A whole-area network presents a tree-like centripetal trend, which is the combination of a star network and cluster-tree network. The whole-area network diverges outward with the important household members as the core, and the resources of mutual assistance are concentrated on several nodes, which is a network configuration with a clear division of labor and easy to manage. However, network centralization is relatively high and vulnerability comparatively is large, which is the disadvantage. The configuration of the medium network tends to be between the two.Figure 1
Annular centripetal type (source: drawn by the authors).Figure 2
Tree centripetal type (source: drawn by the authors).In terms of spatial network, due to the complexity of physical space affected by the natural terrain conditions and the evolution of village pattern, a spatial network cannot be summarized into a specific prototype. The relationships among nodes in mutual aid space network include the zonal network, cluster-tree network, star network, and ring network, as well as the overlap between multiple prototypes (Figure3). However, through the vertical comparison of indicators among small, medium, and whole-area networks, some trends related to mutual support networks can be discovered: firstly, the average density of the spatial network is the highest in small networks and the lowest in whole-area networks, but the spatial average distance is the lowest in small networks and the highest in whole-area networks. This indicates that, similar to the trend of completeness of mutual aid networks, the aggregation degree of spatial networks is also relatively high in small networks while the spatial network is comparatively discrete in whole-area networks. Secondly, through the vertical comparison of the spatial network centrality, it is found that the relationship between the underlying spatial network and the upper spatial network, that is, the core mutual assistance space, formed spontaneously at the bottom is not located in the central space with the highest accessibility but close to the central space of the upper spatial network.Figure 3
The overlap between multiple prototypes (source: drawn by the authors).


### 2.2. Induction Related to Changing Trends

According to the on-the-spot observation and the analysis of network characteristics, combined with the social theory of rural circles (Chen, 2011), it is concluded that there are four types of trends in the relationship and behavior of mutual assistance and support for the aged in contemporary rural areas, and each type has different requirements for the space environment.


#### 2.2.1. Mutual Assistance of Close Relationship in the Family Circle

The close mutual assistance in the family circle is similar to extending the self-support for the elderly between relatives in the family, such as partner cooking, bringing meals, doing laundry, cleaning, and visiting, generally involving daily care and meeting spiritual needs. This form of mutual assistance is the extension of self-support for the aged and is related to the size of the family circle and the strength of internal ties. Therefore, this kind of mutual assistance behavior mostly takes place in their own home, courtyard, or the house of relatives with the same surname, which is more closely related to the daily life care between families.


#### 2.2.2. Exchange and Mutual Assistance in the Human Relationship Circle

Exchange and mutual assistance for the elderly mean that on the basis of trust, people need to be willing to carry out reciprocal aid at the spiritual and material levels and it will happen only when and where it is permitted. This type of mutual assistance involves mutual companionship, paid assistance in purchasing materials, assistance in maintenance, accompanying for medical treatment, and so on. These mutual assistance behaviors often occur in the social activities of the elderly and others, which are caused by mutual assistance when people meet each other and communicate with each other in the same external space.


#### 2.2.3. Rewarding Mutual Assistance in the Public Circle

Unlike the above two, rewarding mutual assistance is not entirely based on the relationship between mutual aid participants, but on the material reward of top-down policy subsidies, and it also involves spiritual rewards for “public figures” (He, 2000). It is usually organized to help each other as planned. The behaviors involved in the rewarding mutual assistance include festive condolences, holding recreational activities, traveling, disputing resolution, emergency rescue, lectures on health care knowledge for the elderly, occasional daily care services, and so on. This type is similar to the home-based elderly care service in urban communities. However, due to the low proportion of participants, few professionals, and shortage of funds, it is difficult to achieve comprehensive coverage like urban communities. This type of mutual assistance behavior mostly occurs in a specific place and time, is organized, and is highly dependent on the specific space environment and geographical location.


#### 2.2.4. Mutual Assistance of Public Welfare in the Demonstration Circle

A demonstration circle means that within a certain range of space, individual behavior is affected by the similar behavior of the surrounding members. In modern rural society, the demonstration circle is a microfield of behavior regulation. In the demonstration circle of public welfare mutual assistance for the aged, there are two types of behavior: first, successful young people who set up a factory in the town or village provide material support for the elderly in their village, thus bringing local reputation, status, influence, and spiritual satisfaction to the elders in their family. Second, the elderly in the village who were too embarrassed to accept one-on-one support from the outside before begin to accept the public welfare support of others, and then, it becomes a group behavior. The activities of public welfare mutual assistance are usually established under some projects, which include cooking for the public free of charge, seeing the movies, watching the plays, organizing religious festivals, organizing baths, tours, and so on. Therefore, it is necessary to have public space support, such as canteens, auditoriums, churches, temples, and bathrooms, to carry out projects.


## 2.1. Analysis on the Characteristics of Mutual Assistance and Support Networks for the Aged

According to the main projects of daily mutual assistance activities in each village, this paper summarizes three kinds of mutual assistance activities with different scales and different functions. On this basis, the mutual aid network and the spatial network of neighborhood, natural village, and administrative village are drawn. The characteristics of the main networks are as follows:A mutual assistance relationship network mainly has two typical network configurations: annular centripetal type and tree centripetal type (Figures1 and 2). At the level of most small networks, the network structure demonstrates a circular centripetal trend, with one or several households as the core, and other members also develop mutual assistance. The small network structure has good completeness and low vulnerability. A whole-area network presents a tree-like centripetal trend, which is the combination of a star network and cluster-tree network. The whole-area network diverges outward with the important household members as the core, and the resources of mutual assistance are concentrated on several nodes, which is a network configuration with a clear division of labor and easy to manage. However, network centralization is relatively high and vulnerability comparatively is large, which is the disadvantage. The configuration of the medium network tends to be between the two.Figure 1
Annular centripetal type (source: drawn by the authors).Figure 2
Tree centripetal type (source: drawn by the authors).In terms of spatial network, due to the complexity of physical space affected by the natural terrain conditions and the evolution of village pattern, a spatial network cannot be summarized into a specific prototype. The relationships among nodes in mutual aid space network include the zonal network, cluster-tree network, star network, and ring network, as well as the overlap between multiple prototypes (Figure3). However, through the vertical comparison of indicators among small, medium, and whole-area networks, some trends related to mutual support networks can be discovered: firstly, the average density of the spatial network is the highest in small networks and the lowest in whole-area networks, but the spatial average distance is the lowest in small networks and the highest in whole-area networks. This indicates that, similar to the trend of completeness of mutual aid networks, the aggregation degree of spatial networks is also relatively high in small networks while the spatial network is comparatively discrete in whole-area networks. Secondly, through the vertical comparison of the spatial network centrality, it is found that the relationship between the underlying spatial network and the upper spatial network, that is, the core mutual assistance space, formed spontaneously at the bottom is not located in the central space with the highest accessibility but close to the central space of the upper spatial network.Figure 3
The overlap between multiple prototypes (source: drawn by the authors).


## 2.2. Induction Related to Changing Trends

According to the on-the-spot observation and the analysis of network characteristics, combined with the social theory of rural circles (Chen, 2011), it is concluded that there are four types of trends in the relationship and behavior of mutual assistance and support for the aged in contemporary rural areas, and each type has different requirements for the space environment.


### 2.2.1. Mutual Assistance of Close Relationship in the Family Circle

The close mutual assistance in the family circle is similar to extending the self-support for the elderly between relatives in the family, such as partner cooking, bringing meals, doing laundry, cleaning, and visiting, generally involving daily care and meeting spiritual needs. This form of mutual assistance is the extension of self-support for the aged and is related to the size of the family circle and the strength of internal ties. Therefore, this kind of mutual assistance behavior mostly takes place in their own home, courtyard, or the house of relatives with the same surname, which is more closely related to the daily life care between families.


### 2.2.2. Exchange and Mutual Assistance in the Human Relationship Circle

Exchange and mutual assistance for the elderly mean that on the basis of trust, people need to be willing to carry out reciprocal aid at the spiritual and material levels and it will happen only when and where it is permitted. This type of mutual assistance involves mutual companionship, paid assistance in purchasing materials, assistance in maintenance, accompanying for medical treatment, and so on. These mutual assistance behaviors often occur in the social activities of the elderly and others, which are caused by mutual assistance when people meet each other and communicate with each other in the same external space.


### 2.2.3. Rewarding Mutual Assistance in the Public Circle

Unlike the above two, rewarding mutual assistance is not entirely based on the relationship between mutual aid participants, but on the material reward of top-down policy subsidies, and it also involves spiritual rewards for “public figures” (He, 2000). It is usually organized to help each other as planned. The behaviors involved in the rewarding mutual assistance include festive condolences, holding recreational activities, traveling, disputing resolution, emergency rescue, lectures on health care knowledge for the elderly, occasional daily care services, and so on. This type is similar to the home-based elderly care service in urban communities. However, due to the low proportion of participants, few professionals, and shortage of funds, it is difficult to achieve comprehensive coverage like urban communities. This type of mutual assistance behavior mostly occurs in a specific place and time, is organized, and is highly dependent on the specific space environment and geographical location.


### 2.2.4. Mutual Assistance of Public Welfare in the Demonstration Circle

A demonstration circle means that within a certain range of space, individual behavior is affected by the similar behavior of the surrounding members. In modern rural society, the demonstration circle is a microfield of behavior regulation. In the demonstration circle of public welfare mutual assistance for the aged, there are two types of behavior: first, successful young people who set up a factory in the town or village provide material support for the elderly in their village, thus bringing local reputation, status, influence, and spiritual satisfaction to the elders in their family. Second, the elderly in the village who were too embarrassed to accept one-on-one support from the outside before begin to accept the public welfare support of others, and then, it becomes a group behavior. The activities of public welfare mutual assistance are usually established under some projects, which include cooking for the public free of charge, seeing the movies, watching the plays, organizing religious festivals, organizing baths, tours, and so on. Therefore, it is necessary to have public space support, such as canteens, auditoriums, churches, temples, and bathrooms, to carry out projects.


## 2.2.1. Mutual Assistance of Close Relationship in the Family Circle

The close mutual assistance in the family circle is similar to extending the self-support for the elderly between relatives in the family, such as partner cooking, bringing meals, doing laundry, cleaning, and visiting, generally involving daily care and meeting spiritual needs. This form of mutual assistance is the extension of self-support for the aged and is related to the size of the family circle and the strength of internal ties. Therefore, this kind of mutual assistance behavior mostly takes place in their own home, courtyard, or the house of relatives with the same surname, which is more closely related to the daily life care between families.


## 2.2.2. Exchange and Mutual Assistance in the Human Relationship Circle

Exchange and mutual assistance for the elderly mean that on the basis of trust, people need to be willing to carry out reciprocal aid at the spiritual and material levels and it will happen only when and where it is permitted. This type of mutual assistance involves mutual companionship, paid assistance in purchasing materials, assistance in maintenance, accompanying for medical treatment, and so on. These mutual assistance behaviors often occur in the social activities of the elderly and others, which are caused by mutual assistance when people meet each other and communicate with each other in the same external space.


## 2.2.3. Rewarding Mutual Assistance in the Public Circle

Unlike the above two, rewarding mutual assistance is not entirely based on the relationship between mutual aid participants, but on the material reward of top-down policy subsidies, and it also involves spiritual rewards for “public figures” (He, 2000). It is usually organized to help each other as planned. The behaviors involved in the rewarding mutual assistance include festive condolences, holding recreational activities, traveling, disputing resolution, emergency rescue, lectures on health care knowledge for the elderly, occasional daily care services, and so on. This type is similar to the home-based elderly care service in urban communities. However, due to the low proportion of participants, few professionals, and shortage of funds, it is difficult to achieve comprehensive coverage like urban communities. This type of mutual assistance behavior mostly occurs in a specific place and time, is organized, and is highly dependent on the specific space environment and geographical location.


## 2.2.4. Mutual Assistance of Public Welfare in the Demonstration Circle

A demonstration circle means that within a certain range of space, individual behavior is affected by the similar behavior of the surrounding members. In modern rural society, the demonstration circle is a microfield of behavior regulation. In the demonstration circle of public welfare mutual assistance for the aged, there are two types of behavior: first, successful young people who set up a factory in the town or village provide material support for the elderly in their village, thus bringing local reputation, status, influence, and spiritual satisfaction to the elders in their family. Second, the elderly in the village who were too embarrassed to accept one-on-one support from the outside before begin to accept the public welfare support of others, and then, it becomes a group behavior. The activities of public welfare mutual assistance are usually established under some projects, which include cooking for the public free of charge, seeing the movies, watching the plays, organizing religious festivals, organizing baths, tours, and so on. Therefore, it is necessary to have public space support, such as canteens, auditoriums, churches, temples, and bathrooms, to carry out projects.


## 3. Promote the Living Mode of Mutual Assistance for the Elderly: The Framework of the Mutual Support System for the Elderly in Rural Areas Is Put Forward

### 3.1. Driving Conditions of the Framework of the Mutual Support System

#### 3.1.1. Inducing Motivation

Through extensive investigations and interviews on the status of the mutual support system for the elderly in rural areas in Zhejiang, it is concluded that large-scale mutual assistance for the elderly is rarely found in suburban villages in large- and medium-sized cities, but mostly in villages far away from large- and medium-sized cities and relatively underdeveloped. To sum up, this kind of village has three typical characteristics: backward economy and industry, imbalance of population proportion, and location far away from the city. These background characteristics create a typical “common limited environment,” which becomes the inducing motivation.


#### 3.1.2. Primary Internal Driving Force

Philips Abrams, a British scholar, holds that some special social backgrounds, such as consanguinity, geography, friendship, morality, aspiration, and interest and other value communities, are the basic context for the establishment of mutual assistance (Bulmer, 1986). From the perspective of local villages, the primary internal driving force of the mutual support system also comes from some basic context. First, the remaining human resources in the village mainly include those who have not been transferred to nonagricultural industries due to family constraints and comprehensive interests, as well as migrant workers who have returned home and have been eliminated as a result of the adjustment of the urban macroindustrial structure. Second, the primitive internal drive comes from the mutual assistance relationship under the new ethical order, including the development of mutual assistance behaviors under the four circles mentioned above. Finally, it comes from the protection, rights and obligations, overall management, and incentive mechanism of some mutual aid and autonomous organizations.


#### 3.1.3. Extensional Potential Resources

The mutual support system is not an energy conservation system, so the organizational function is often unable to play effectively and the mutual assistance relationship cannot be maintained smoothly due to the shortage of resources. Mutual aid and autonomous organizations can be upgraded only when extended resources are in place. These external resources include economic and policy support from the government, such as special subsidies to maintain daily operation, professional and technical guidance, and resource integration of village stock facilities and space.


### 3.2. The Concept and Characteristics of the Framework of the Mutual Support System

#### 3.2.1. The Concept

The framework of the mutual support system is the core cell that constitutes the living space of mutual assistance for the aged in rural areas. This cognitive framework for the construction of rural human settlements is formed to adapt to the contemporary rural population structure and economic conditions, make full use of rural surplus human resources, and is based on the organizational model of rural mutual assistance for the elderly. Specifically, it takes a specific area as a unit and the social organizations of mutual assistance for the elderly as the support to make up for the current vacancy functions of self-help and public assistance for the elderly in rural areas and the absence of social organizations. Moreover, it carries on the superimposed construction method of human settlements in space.


#### 3.2.2. The Characteristics

From the three characteristic elements of “relationship,” “content,” and “actor” in the mutual support network, three typical characteristics can be summarized, respectively, in the operation unit, the function unit, and the space unit (Figure4).Figure 4
Characteristics of the framework (source: drawn by the authors).The operation unit represents the basic operation logic of social and spatial aspects. “Relationship” is the basic content and main driving force of this operational logic. In the logic of relationship operation, the elderly villagers are the first role to create mutual aid organizations, seek financial assistance, implement mutual assistance programs, or manage organizations. The primary focus of self-regulatory organizations which belong to grassroots mutual assistance is on social interaction, access to services, social action, or a combination. Some of these projects are completely independent and grassroots-initiated, but many of them are supported by existing service providers and the government. Importantly, elderly members themselves are promoting these efforts, rather than acting only as service recipients, as the government-mandated community planning work does (Figure5).Figure 5
The operation unit (source: drawn by the authors).The function unit involves “content” elements in mutual aid networks and spatial networks. These elements are reflected in mutual service and space functions, and their essence is the needs of mutual assistance members. Through the interview and investigation, it is found that the needs of the elderly who help each other are not constant in the actual situation. When there are differences in natural conditions, social structure, and economic conditions in different villages, the needs of members can be seen to be obviously different. Therefore, it is of little significance to put too much emphasis on the integrity of functional types in the mutual care model, and the focus is on how to implement the function. Among the ways of implementing the function, organized public welfare activities play a key role (Figure6). Public welfare activities with different frequencies, diversities, and multilevels are no longer limited to communication functions but serve as a catalyst for mutual service (Figure 7). In this way, mutual service and corresponding spatial functions are activated and maintained in the environment where media activities take place, rather than being limited to a facility.Figure 6
Organized public welfare activities (source: drawn by the authors).Figure 7
Catalyst for mutual service (source: drawn by the authors).The space unit originates from the “actor” element in the theory of network analysis. In the social aspect, the space unit is the social spatial organization formed by the “mutual aid actors” in the mutual aid network according to the spontaneous mutual assistance relationship. In terms of spatiality, the space unit is the “action place of mutual aid” in the spatial network, which is a complete agglomeration of physical space entities formed according to the spatial relations under natural conditions. From the perspective of network analysis, spatial unit is not only a “community” with multiple network correlation, to a certain extent reflected in the entity spatial unit, but also a “sequence”; that is, it contains the primary and secondary relationship and precedence relation among spatial elements. There is some fuzzy structural relevance between the social space and the physical space of these “actors” (Figure8).Figure 8
The space unit with catalyst space (source: drawn by the authors).


### 3.3. Spatial Elements of the Framework of the Mutual Support System

According to the social network theory and the characteristics of traditional villages, the framework of mutual support system will be further defined from the perspective of spatial elements, which can not only be used to analyze the current status, but also help to form a new and relatively organic space for mutual assistance.


#### 3.3.1. The Domain and the Boundary

The domain is the full range of space occupied for maintaining the dynamic balance of the overall mutual aid organization and the controllability of the units. In a narrow sense, the domain is the place where all the members of the mutual aid network live, including people of three sizes, respectively, in common administrative villages, multiple natural villages, or a relatively large natural village. In a broad sense, the complete operation unit is composed of two parts: introversion and extension, in which the extension part is the external enterprises and units that provide financial assistance. The extension part is also responsible for connecting to the end of the original rural old-age service system. If the domain of the extension is left aside, only in the domain of internal space, the neighborhood support unit is an “isolated island,” which cannot be balanced and cannot be regulated. The scope of domain should conform to the travel mode restrictions of the elderly in rural areas. According to the interview and investigation, it is concluded that the maximum acceptable walking time of the members in the three groups is about 2 minutes, 5 minutes, and 15 minutes, respectively. Combined with the walking speed of the elderly in different age groups (Elizabeth A. Webb, 2017), there are three levels of domain scale with a radius of about 90-120 meters, 240-300 meters, and 720-900 meters.


#### 3.3.2. The Center and Nodes

To a certain extent, the center and nodes are the functional media space in the radiation circle of the mutual support system. At the current stage of rural development in China, it is impossible and unnecessary to set up special mutual service facilities between the neighborhoods and around the houses where the elderly carry out daily mutual aid activities, which is not only a waste of resources but also destroys the overall style of the countryside. Therefore, the use of existing public space nodes and abandoned facilities is relatively flexible and applicable. However, not all public spaces can meet the demands. From the perspective of functional media, the core space node needs to meet three conditions. First, it can accommodate the types of public welfare activities that the village mutual aid system often relies on. Second, the empty spots should be closely related to the living and using space of the quasi-formal supporters, and the quasi-formal supporters in this unit should be regarded as a “small service organization.” Third, it is necessary to meet the conditions of space suitable for aging.


#### 3.3.3. The Connection Elements

The connection elements are mainly reflected in the characteristics of mutual assistance linear space based on hierarchical relations. The walking path of the elderly is quite different from that of healthy people and people with disabilities, showing the typical characteristics that they need to pause and rest or observe in the middle of walking. Therefore, according to the general flow of people and functions of the village, the classification is carried out. The results indicates that the higher the level of linear space, the more rest space is needed due to the large number of mutual aid activities, the large scale of participants, and the low degree of privacy.


## 3.1. Driving Conditions of the Framework of the Mutual Support System

### 3.1.1. Inducing Motivation

Through extensive investigations and interviews on the status of the mutual support system for the elderly in rural areas in Zhejiang, it is concluded that large-scale mutual assistance for the elderly is rarely found in suburban villages in large- and medium-sized cities, but mostly in villages far away from large- and medium-sized cities and relatively underdeveloped. To sum up, this kind of village has three typical characteristics: backward economy and industry, imbalance of population proportion, and location far away from the city. These background characteristics create a typical “common limited environment,” which becomes the inducing motivation.


### 3.1.2. Primary Internal Driving Force

Philips Abrams, a British scholar, holds that some special social backgrounds, such as consanguinity, geography, friendship, morality, aspiration, and interest and other value communities, are the basic context for the establishment of mutual assistance (Bulmer, 1986). From the perspective of local villages, the primary internal driving force of the mutual support system also comes from some basic context. First, the remaining human resources in the village mainly include those who have not been transferred to nonagricultural industries due to family constraints and comprehensive interests, as well as migrant workers who have returned home and have been eliminated as a result of the adjustment of the urban macroindustrial structure. Second, the primitive internal drive comes from the mutual assistance relationship under the new ethical order, including the development of mutual assistance behaviors under the four circles mentioned above. Finally, it comes from the protection, rights and obligations, overall management, and incentive mechanism of some mutual aid and autonomous organizations.


### 3.1.3. Extensional Potential Resources

The mutual support system is not an energy conservation system, so the organizational function is often unable to play effectively and the mutual assistance relationship cannot be maintained smoothly due to the shortage of resources. Mutual aid and autonomous organizations can be upgraded only when extended resources are in place. These external resources include economic and policy support from the government, such as special subsidies to maintain daily operation, professional and technical guidance, and resource integration of village stock facilities and space.


## 3.1.1. Inducing Motivation

Through extensive investigations and interviews on the status of the mutual support system for the elderly in rural areas in Zhejiang, it is concluded that large-scale mutual assistance for the elderly is rarely found in suburban villages in large- and medium-sized cities, but mostly in villages far away from large- and medium-sized cities and relatively underdeveloped. To sum up, this kind of village has three typical characteristics: backward economy and industry, imbalance of population proportion, and location far away from the city. These background characteristics create a typical “common limited environment,” which becomes the inducing motivation.


## 3.1.2. Primary Internal Driving Force

Philips Abrams, a British scholar, holds that some special social backgrounds, such as consanguinity, geography, friendship, morality, aspiration, and interest and other value communities, are the basic context for the establishment of mutual assistance (Bulmer, 1986). From the perspective of local villages, the primary internal driving force of the mutual support system also comes from some basic context. First, the remaining human resources in the village mainly include those who have not been transferred to nonagricultural industries due to family constraints and comprehensive interests, as well as migrant workers who have returned home and have been eliminated as a result of the adjustment of the urban macroindustrial structure. Second, the primitive internal drive comes from the mutual assistance relationship under the new ethical order, including the development of mutual assistance behaviors under the four circles mentioned above. Finally, it comes from the protection, rights and obligations, overall management, and incentive mechanism of some mutual aid and autonomous organizations.


## 3.1.3. Extensional Potential Resources

The mutual support system is not an energy conservation system, so the organizational function is often unable to play effectively and the mutual assistance relationship cannot be maintained smoothly due to the shortage of resources. Mutual aid and autonomous organizations can be upgraded only when extended resources are in place. These external resources include economic and policy support from the government, such as special subsidies to maintain daily operation, professional and technical guidance, and resource integration of village stock facilities and space.


## 3.2. The Concept and Characteristics of the Framework of the Mutual Support System

### 3.2.1. The Concept

The framework of the mutual support system is the core cell that constitutes the living space of mutual assistance for the aged in rural areas. This cognitive framework for the construction of rural human settlements is formed to adapt to the contemporary rural population structure and economic conditions, make full use of rural surplus human resources, and is based on the organizational model of rural mutual assistance for the elderly. Specifically, it takes a specific area as a unit and the social organizations of mutual assistance for the elderly as the support to make up for the current vacancy functions of self-help and public assistance for the elderly in rural areas and the absence of social organizations. Moreover, it carries on the superimposed construction method of human settlements in space.


### 3.2.2. The Characteristics

From the three characteristic elements of “relationship,” “content,” and “actor” in the mutual support network, three typical characteristics can be summarized, respectively, in the operation unit, the function unit, and the space unit (Figure4).Figure 4
Characteristics of the framework (source: drawn by the authors).The operation unit represents the basic operation logic of social and spatial aspects. “Relationship” is the basic content and main driving force of this operational logic. In the logic of relationship operation, the elderly villagers are the first role to create mutual aid organizations, seek financial assistance, implement mutual assistance programs, or manage organizations. The primary focus of self-regulatory organizations which belong to grassroots mutual assistance is on social interaction, access to services, social action, or a combination. Some of these projects are completely independent and grassroots-initiated, but many of them are supported by existing service providers and the government. Importantly, elderly members themselves are promoting these efforts, rather than acting only as service recipients, as the government-mandated community planning work does (Figure5).Figure 5
The operation unit (source: drawn by the authors).The function unit involves “content” elements in mutual aid networks and spatial networks. These elements are reflected in mutual service and space functions, and their essence is the needs of mutual assistance members. Through the interview and investigation, it is found that the needs of the elderly who help each other are not constant in the actual situation. When there are differences in natural conditions, social structure, and economic conditions in different villages, the needs of members can be seen to be obviously different. Therefore, it is of little significance to put too much emphasis on the integrity of functional types in the mutual care model, and the focus is on how to implement the function. Among the ways of implementing the function, organized public welfare activities play a key role (Figure6). Public welfare activities with different frequencies, diversities, and multilevels are no longer limited to communication functions but serve as a catalyst for mutual service (Figure 7). In this way, mutual service and corresponding spatial functions are activated and maintained in the environment where media activities take place, rather than being limited to a facility.Figure 6
Organized public welfare activities (source: drawn by the authors).Figure 7
Catalyst for mutual service (source: drawn by the authors).The space unit originates from the “actor” element in the theory of network analysis. In the social aspect, the space unit is the social spatial organization formed by the “mutual aid actors” in the mutual aid network according to the spontaneous mutual assistance relationship. In terms of spatiality, the space unit is the “action place of mutual aid” in the spatial network, which is a complete agglomeration of physical space entities formed according to the spatial relations under natural conditions. From the perspective of network analysis, spatial unit is not only a “community” with multiple network correlation, to a certain extent reflected in the entity spatial unit, but also a “sequence”; that is, it contains the primary and secondary relationship and precedence relation among spatial elements. There is some fuzzy structural relevance between the social space and the physical space of these “actors” (Figure8).Figure 8
The space unit with catalyst space (source: drawn by the authors).


## 3.2.1. The Concept

The framework of the mutual support system is the core cell that constitutes the living space of mutual assistance for the aged in rural areas. This cognitive framework for the construction of rural human settlements is formed to adapt to the contemporary rural population structure and economic conditions, make full use of rural surplus human resources, and is based on the organizational model of rural mutual assistance for the elderly. Specifically, it takes a specific area as a unit and the social organizations of mutual assistance for the elderly as the support to make up for the current vacancy functions of self-help and public assistance for the elderly in rural areas and the absence of social organizations. Moreover, it carries on the superimposed construction method of human settlements in space.


## 3.2.2. The Characteristics

From the three characteristic elements of “relationship,” “content,” and “actor” in the mutual support network, three typical characteristics can be summarized, respectively, in the operation unit, the function unit, and the space unit (Figure4).Figure 4
Characteristics of the framework (source: drawn by the authors).The operation unit represents the basic operation logic of social and spatial aspects. “Relationship” is the basic content and main driving force of this operational logic. In the logic of relationship operation, the elderly villagers are the first role to create mutual aid organizations, seek financial assistance, implement mutual assistance programs, or manage organizations. The primary focus of self-regulatory organizations which belong to grassroots mutual assistance is on social interaction, access to services, social action, or a combination. Some of these projects are completely independent and grassroots-initiated, but many of them are supported by existing service providers and the government. Importantly, elderly members themselves are promoting these efforts, rather than acting only as service recipients, as the government-mandated community planning work does (Figure5).Figure 5
The operation unit (source: drawn by the authors).The function unit involves “content” elements in mutual aid networks and spatial networks. These elements are reflected in mutual service and space functions, and their essence is the needs of mutual assistance members. Through the interview and investigation, it is found that the needs of the elderly who help each other are not constant in the actual situation. When there are differences in natural conditions, social structure, and economic conditions in different villages, the needs of members can be seen to be obviously different. Therefore, it is of little significance to put too much emphasis on the integrity of functional types in the mutual care model, and the focus is on how to implement the function. Among the ways of implementing the function, organized public welfare activities play a key role (Figure6). Public welfare activities with different frequencies, diversities, and multilevels are no longer limited to communication functions but serve as a catalyst for mutual service (Figure 7). In this way, mutual service and corresponding spatial functions are activated and maintained in the environment where media activities take place, rather than being limited to a facility.Figure 6
Organized public welfare activities (source: drawn by the authors).Figure 7
Catalyst for mutual service (source: drawn by the authors).The space unit originates from the “actor” element in the theory of network analysis. In the social aspect, the space unit is the social spatial organization formed by the “mutual aid actors” in the mutual aid network according to the spontaneous mutual assistance relationship. In terms of spatiality, the space unit is the “action place of mutual aid” in the spatial network, which is a complete agglomeration of physical space entities formed according to the spatial relations under natural conditions. From the perspective of network analysis, spatial unit is not only a “community” with multiple network correlation, to a certain extent reflected in the entity spatial unit, but also a “sequence”; that is, it contains the primary and secondary relationship and precedence relation among spatial elements. There is some fuzzy structural relevance between the social space and the physical space of these “actors” (Figure8).Figure 8
The space unit with catalyst space (source: drawn by the authors).


## 3.3. Spatial Elements of the Framework of the Mutual Support System

According to the social network theory and the characteristics of traditional villages, the framework of mutual support system will be further defined from the perspective of spatial elements, which can not only be used to analyze the current status, but also help to form a new and relatively organic space for mutual assistance.


### 3.3.1. The Domain and the Boundary

The domain is the full range of space occupied for maintaining the dynamic balance of the overall mutual aid organization and the controllability of the units. In a narrow sense, the domain is the place where all the members of the mutual aid network live, including people of three sizes, respectively, in common administrative villages, multiple natural villages, or a relatively large natural village. In a broad sense, the complete operation unit is composed of two parts: introversion and extension, in which the extension part is the external enterprises and units that provide financial assistance. The extension part is also responsible for connecting to the end of the original rural old-age service system. If the domain of the extension is left aside, only in the domain of internal space, the neighborhood support unit is an “isolated island,” which cannot be balanced and cannot be regulated. The scope of domain should conform to the travel mode restrictions of the elderly in rural areas. According to the interview and investigation, it is concluded that the maximum acceptable walking time of the members in the three groups is about 2 minutes, 5 minutes, and 15 minutes, respectively. Combined with the walking speed of the elderly in different age groups (Elizabeth A. Webb, 2017), there are three levels of domain scale with a radius of about 90-120 meters, 240-300 meters, and 720-900 meters.


### 3.3.2. The Center and Nodes

To a certain extent, the center and nodes are the functional media space in the radiation circle of the mutual support system. At the current stage of rural development in China, it is impossible and unnecessary to set up special mutual service facilities between the neighborhoods and around the houses where the elderly carry out daily mutual aid activities, which is not only a waste of resources but also destroys the overall style of the countryside. Therefore, the use of existing public space nodes and abandoned facilities is relatively flexible and applicable. However, not all public spaces can meet the demands. From the perspective of functional media, the core space node needs to meet three conditions. First, it can accommodate the types of public welfare activities that the village mutual aid system often relies on. Second, the empty spots should be closely related to the living and using space of the quasi-formal supporters, and the quasi-formal supporters in this unit should be regarded as a “small service organization.” Third, it is necessary to meet the conditions of space suitable for aging.


### 3.3.3. The Connection Elements

The connection elements are mainly reflected in the characteristics of mutual assistance linear space based on hierarchical relations. The walking path of the elderly is quite different from that of healthy people and people with disabilities, showing the typical characteristics that they need to pause and rest or observe in the middle of walking. Therefore, according to the general flow of people and functions of the village, the classification is carried out. The results indicates that the higher the level of linear space, the more rest space is needed due to the large number of mutual aid activities, the large scale of participants, and the low degree of privacy.


## 3.3.1. The Domain and the Boundary

The domain is the full range of space occupied for maintaining the dynamic balance of the overall mutual aid organization and the controllability of the units. In a narrow sense, the domain is the place where all the members of the mutual aid network live, including people of three sizes, respectively, in common administrative villages, multiple natural villages, or a relatively large natural village. In a broad sense, the complete operation unit is composed of two parts: introversion and extension, in which the extension part is the external enterprises and units that provide financial assistance. The extension part is also responsible for connecting to the end of the original rural old-age service system. If the domain of the extension is left aside, only in the domain of internal space, the neighborhood support unit is an “isolated island,” which cannot be balanced and cannot be regulated. The scope of domain should conform to the travel mode restrictions of the elderly in rural areas. According to the interview and investigation, it is concluded that the maximum acceptable walking time of the members in the three groups is about 2 minutes, 5 minutes, and 15 minutes, respectively. Combined with the walking speed of the elderly in different age groups (Elizabeth A. Webb, 2017), there are three levels of domain scale with a radius of about 90-120 meters, 240-300 meters, and 720-900 meters.


## 3.3.2. The Center and Nodes

To a certain extent, the center and nodes are the functional media space in the radiation circle of the mutual support system. At the current stage of rural development in China, it is impossible and unnecessary to set up special mutual service facilities between the neighborhoods and around the houses where the elderly carry out daily mutual aid activities, which is not only a waste of resources but also destroys the overall style of the countryside. Therefore, the use of existing public space nodes and abandoned facilities is relatively flexible and applicable. However, not all public spaces can meet the demands. From the perspective of functional media, the core space node needs to meet three conditions. First, it can accommodate the types of public welfare activities that the village mutual aid system often relies on. Second, the empty spots should be closely related to the living and using space of the quasi-formal supporters, and the quasi-formal supporters in this unit should be regarded as a “small service organization.” Third, it is necessary to meet the conditions of space suitable for aging.


## 3.3.3. The Connection Elements

The connection elements are mainly reflected in the characteristics of mutual assistance linear space based on hierarchical relations. The walking path of the elderly is quite different from that of healthy people and people with disabilities, showing the typical characteristics that they need to pause and rest or observe in the middle of walking. Therefore, according to the general flow of people and functions of the village, the classification is carried out. The results indicates that the higher the level of linear space, the more rest space is needed due to the large number of mutual aid activities, the large scale of participants, and the low degree of privacy.


## 4. Conclusion

The framework of the mutual support system for the rural elderly is put forward under the realistic background of “getting old before getting rich” in China, which is aimed at exploring the most common phenomenon of mutual support for the elderly and the use of space in rural areas from the perspective of network analysis and rural planning. Through the reconfiguration and effective guidance of the existing driving forces, social resources, and stock space, the framework can update and activate the rural areas which have gradually become hollowing out and where there are serious difficulties in providing for the elderly. The next research work needs to carry out quantitative research on group relationships and specific research on individual relationships under this framework. It will lead the left-behind elderly to gradually step out of the predicament of social closure, poor environment, and the difficulties in old age, which has a certain enlightening significance for the suitable aging research in the same type of villages.



---

*Source: 4954185-2022-07-16.xml*