# Large-Scale Preparation of Polymer Nanofibers for Air Filtration by a New Multineedle Electrospinning Device

Authors: Yuan Xu; Xiao Li; Hong-Fei Xiang; Qian-Qian Zhang; Xiao-Xiong Wang; Miao Yu; Long-Yun Hao; Yun-Ze Long
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

There are still some challenges for mass-scale production via electrospinning (e-spinning). For example, the cost of industrialized equipment is relatively expensive, and the subsequent maintenance costs are high. The reliability and stability of the production process are also one of the important challenges. The recycling of organic solvents and the volatilization of solvents not only affect the quality of nanofibers, but also causes environmental pollution. In this work, a new multineedle e-spinning device has been proposed for large-scale production of polymer nanofibers. The spinning solution is provided through the outside surface of the needle to avoid needle clogging problem, which is different from the traditional multineedle e-spinning. The successful preparation of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) nanofiber membrane with production rate ~50 g h-1 proves the feasibility of the device, which also can be used to prepare other functional nanofibers such as polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) and polyacrylonitrile (PAN). The prepared TPU nanofiber gauze has been characterized. The average fiber diameter was 145.3 nm. The surface of the sample was found to be uniform, and the water contact angle was 138.9°. The sample had gas permeability of 1500 mm s-1, excellent PM2.5 removal efficiency of 99.897%, and optical transparency of ~56%, indicating that the new device has a practical application perspective.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Following the invention of electrospun (e-spun) nanofibers in 1934 by Thomas [1], electrospinning (e-spinning) technology was in a trough for a long time. In recent decades, e-spun nanofibers have been extensively studied by researchers, and their potential applications have also been largely studied [2–7]. Today, e-spinning equipment and technical solutions, as well as e-spun materials, are rapidly turning to commercialization. At the same time, it is not limited to laboratory preparation of nanofibers, but also specialized companies provide laboratory and industrial-scale components and equipment for e-spinning and commercialize their batch-prepared nanofibers. Therefore, researchers are committed to how to solve various technical problems in the mass production process and increase the production rate of nanofibers, which is a key issue for commercial applications [8]. At present, the solution to the above problems is mainly to continuously improve the development of nanofiber batch manufacturing technology through the innovation of multiple devices and improvement of e-spinning nozzles, so as to provide ideas for the industrial manufacturing of nanofibers.For the time being, most of the e-spinning devices in lab use a single needle method to produce nanofibers, which makes the production and efficiency of nanofibers very low and cannot meet the requirements of large-scale production. The method of realizing multinozzle and multijet by improving the device can not only greatly improve the yield of nanofibers, but also achieve continuous production and obtain large-area fiber mesh [9–12]. The multinozzle or multijet method e-spinning refers to the purpose of spinning a plurality of nozzles according to a certain regularity, thereby achieving the purpose of batch preparation of nanofibers. Multineedle array spinning is generally performed in a linear or two-dimensional array (e.g., triangular, hexagonal, and circular) [13]. Theron et al. [11] designed a method of e-spinning nanofibers into a 3×3 array of needles, resulting in a yield that was several hundred times greater than that of a single nozzle. Li et al. [14] designed an e-spinning device that is different from the traditional multineedle linear arrangement. The device uses a roller as the receiving pole, and the linearly arranged needles are mounted on the laterally moving slide table. Then, the polystyrene is obtained by adjusting the number of nozzles of different polymer solutions. The nanofiber membrane is uniformly mixed with the polyamide two-component, and the functionalized fiber is obtained while increasing the yield. Kim and Park [15] studied a similar multineedle up-spinning device, which expanded the number of needles to 38,880, greatly promoting the industrial scale of multineedle e-spinning produce. Liu et al. [16, 17] designed a mesh belt multineedle e-spinning device, by controlling the volatilization rate of the polymer solution by installing a temperature control system on the e-spinning device. The production quality of the fiber web is improved, and it is also proved that the device can be simultaneously spun using a plurality of solutions to obtain a composite nanofiber web. Liu et al. [18] proposed a high-efficiency needle-free e-spinning technology based on a circular rotary bead wire for the preparation of polymer nanofibers. This needle-free e-spinning technology is expected to produce nanofibers on a large scale. Important advances in needle-free spinning methods, including spinneret construction, production efficiency, fiber quality, and available industrial-scale equipment and commercial applications, are highlighted in the market [19].It is worth noting that several spinning devices for mass production of nanofibers in the industry currently have certain disadvantages. For example, conventional e-spinning provides a polymer solution through the inside of the needle, and there are often problems such as needle clogging. For the drum-type electrode spinning, although the spinning yield is improved, the open solution tank in the spinning process has the disadvantage of solvent volatilization, which leads to a gradual increase of the spinning solution concentration and affects the fiber morphology.In this work, according to the various multineedle e-spinning devices previously reported, a new multineedle external liquid device was designed. The experiment was carried out with thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) solution as the e-spinning precursor solution, which proved the feasibility of the device and successfully produced nanofibers. At the same time, the efficiency of preparing the nanofibers is greatly improved, and the nanofiber membrane can be prepared quickly and continuously. The prepared nanofiber membrane was characterized, and the hydrophobicity test proved that the prepared nanofiber had better hydrophobicity. Through the test of translucency of the sample, the anticaries and gas permeability cycle test proved that it has good sustainable use, remarkable PM2.5 removal efficiency (99.897%), air permeability (1500 mm s-1), and optical transparency (56%) that can be used in commercial scale production of antifog screens.


## 2. Experimental Section

### 2.1. Experimental Device Composition and Principle

The experimental device is shown in Figure1. First, the device components include a cylindrical spinning solution channel (with a diameter of 1.0 cm), a linear multineedle slide table (the needle diameter is about 1.0 mm, and the needle spacing is about 4.0 cm), a high-voltage power supply, a liquid collection tube, and a collector (the needle-collector distance is about 30 cm). The positive pole of the high-voltage power supply is connected to the multineedle slide table, and the negative pole receives the collector. The cylindrical channel is filled with polymer solution, the spinning solution channel is fixed, and the multineedle sliding table continuously draws the polymer solution by moving left and right (the moving speed is about 0.2~0.5 m min-1), so that the spinning solution in the cylindrical channel is externally attached to the surface of the long needle. When a high voltage (50~60 kV) is applied, the plug fluid forms a jet under the traction of a high-voltage electrostatic field and eventually solidifies into a collector deposited on the fiber. In this process, each long needle surface can form multiple jets at the same time, so the multineedle linear arrangement can effectively improve the preparation yield of nanofibers.Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the multineedle external liquid e-spinning device.


### 2.2. Experimental Equipment and Spinning Conditions

The morphology of TPU fibers was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM Feiner High Resolution Professional Edition Phenom Pro). The FX3300 laboratory Air-IV automatic filtration performance tester from Shanghai Lippo Co., Ltd. was purchased to evaluate the filtration performance. The air permeability of Shanghai Huifen Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. was tested using AFC-131. The TPU fiber film contact angle was analyzed by an optical contact angle meter. The light transmittance of the Shanghai Aoxiang Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd. UV1901PC ultraviolet spectrophotometer was measured.TPU was used as the spinning material in the experiment. First, the TPU was dissolved in DMF, the TPU mass fraction was 17 wt%, and the mixture was stirred at 40°C until completely dissolved. The applied high voltage is 60 kV, and the receiving distance was 30 cm. In the experimental process, a TPU nanofiber gauze was obtained by preparing a TPU fiber using a fine gauze as a receiver.


## 2.1. Experimental Device Composition and Principle

The experimental device is shown in Figure1. First, the device components include a cylindrical spinning solution channel (with a diameter of 1.0 cm), a linear multineedle slide table (the needle diameter is about 1.0 mm, and the needle spacing is about 4.0 cm), a high-voltage power supply, a liquid collection tube, and a collector (the needle-collector distance is about 30 cm). The positive pole of the high-voltage power supply is connected to the multineedle slide table, and the negative pole receives the collector. The cylindrical channel is filled with polymer solution, the spinning solution channel is fixed, and the multineedle sliding table continuously draws the polymer solution by moving left and right (the moving speed is about 0.2~0.5 m min-1), so that the spinning solution in the cylindrical channel is externally attached to the surface of the long needle. When a high voltage (50~60 kV) is applied, the plug fluid forms a jet under the traction of a high-voltage electrostatic field and eventually solidifies into a collector deposited on the fiber. In this process, each long needle surface can form multiple jets at the same time, so the multineedle linear arrangement can effectively improve the preparation yield of nanofibers.Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the multineedle external liquid e-spinning device.


## 2.2. Experimental Equipment and Spinning Conditions

The morphology of TPU fibers was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM Feiner High Resolution Professional Edition Phenom Pro). The FX3300 laboratory Air-IV automatic filtration performance tester from Shanghai Lippo Co., Ltd. was purchased to evaluate the filtration performance. The air permeability of Shanghai Huifen Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. was tested using AFC-131. The TPU fiber film contact angle was analyzed by an optical contact angle meter. The light transmittance of the Shanghai Aoxiang Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd. UV1901PC ultraviolet spectrophotometer was measured.TPU was used as the spinning material in the experiment. First, the TPU was dissolved in DMF, the TPU mass fraction was 17 wt%, and the mixture was stirred at 40°C until completely dissolved. The applied high voltage is 60 kV, and the receiving distance was 30 cm. In the experimental process, a TPU nanofiber gauze was obtained by preparing a TPU fiber using a fine gauze as a receiver.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Fiber Morphology Characterization

As shown in Figure2, we successfully prepared TPU nanofibers through a multineedle external liquid device. Figure 2(a) shows an optical picture of the fiber membrane, and it is apparent from the picture that the surface of the fiber membrane is uniform. Figures 2(b) and 2(c) are SEM images of fiber membranes at different magnifications, and Figure 2(d) is a fiber diameter distribution diagram of TPU fibers. From the fiber diameter distribution diagram, it can be seen that the average diameter of the TPU fiber membrane is 145.3 nm, the diameter of the TPU fiber prepared by other methods is finer, and the fiber distribution is uniform. The average diameter of the nanofibers of the traditional needle electrospun TPU prepared in our earlier stage is about 1094 nm [20]. Obviously, the diameter of nanofibers prepared by multineedle electrospinning is smaller.Figure 2
Morphology of e-spun TPU fiber membrane. (a) Optical image. (b, c) SEM pictures of the TPU fibers. (d) Diameter distribution of the fiber.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


### 3.2. TPU Fiber Gauze Hydrophobicity Test

The prepared TPU nanoyarn web was tested for contact angle, and its hydrophobic property was judged. The contact angle of water to the water was 138.9°, which proved that the TPU nanogauze had great hydrophobic properties, as shown in Figure3. The water contact angle of traditional electrospun TPU nanofibers is 129° [20]. The excellent hydrophobic properties of TPU nanofiber gauze provide a strong guarantee for rain-proof screens in subsequent real life, and the hydrophobic properties provide the possibility of recycling of TPU nanostencils and extend the cycle and service life. In order to further simulate the resistance of the material to different pollutants in rainy days, we explored the hydrophobic properties of different kinds of dye solutions. We observed the fiber membrane by optically photographing water droplets and different kinds of dye solutions (including rhodamine B, methylene blue, and methylene orange) onto the TPU nanoyarn net. The hydrophobic properties confirmed that the TPU nanofiber gauze has better hydrophobic properties for the abovementioned liquids, as shown in Figure 4.Figure 3
The water contact angle of the TPU fiber gauze.Figure 4
Optical photographs showing the hydrophobic angle characteristics of different types of dyes. (a) Water. (b) Rhodamine B. (c) Methylene blue. (d) Methylene orange.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


### 3.3. Transmittance Test

The transmittance test of the TPU nanofiber gauze was carried out. Figure5(a) shows an optical picture of the light transmission of a blank gauze, and the light transmission of the blank gauze is 80%. Figure 5(b) is a transparency optical photograph of the TPU nanofiber gauze. The optical fiber screen of the prepared nanofiber gauze was 56%, and the air filter screen with a general transmittance of 50% or more was able to pass sufficient light. It is proved to have excellent light transmittance. The TPU nanofiber film prepared by traditional electrostatic spinning has a light transmittance of 60%, which is not much different [21].Figure 5
Optical picture of transmittance. (a) Blank gauze. (b) TPU nanofiber gauze.
(a)
(b)


### 3.4. Filtration Performance and Permeability Test

Filtration efficiency is one of the important parameters for evaluating the performance of antifog gauze. Therefore, we conducted a filtration efficiency test on the prepared TPU nanofiber gauze. During the test, the temperature was 20°C, the relative humidity was 40.6%, the air flow rate was set to 2.0 m3 h-1, and the aerosol particles were used as PM contaminants. Figure 6 shows the filtration efficiency and filtration schematic of the TPU nanofiber gauze. Figure 6(a) shows the filtration efficiency of the sample is tested for 10 times. It can be seen from Figure 6(a) that the filtration effect of the sample is proportional to the particle size, and the larger the particle size, the more difficult it is to pass through the nanofiber membrane. When the particle diameter is ≥3.75 μm, the removal efficiency is 100%, and the pressure drop is only 20 Pa. For PM with smaller particle size, the removal effect is also higher, with a minimum of 96.3%. At the same time, it can be seen that the removal rate of PM2.5 by TPU nanofiber gauze is 99.897%. According to literature reports, the filtration efficiency of PM2.5 for TPU composite nanofiber membranes prepared by traditional electrostatic spinning technology is 99.654% [21]. Therefore, the nanofiber membrane prepared by the new multineedle electrostatic spinning technology has better filtration performance. Figure 6(b) is a schematic diagram of the effect of TPU nanofiber gauze on PM filtration of different particle sizes.Figure 6
Filtration performance of TPU nanofiber gauze. (a) The different times of filtration efficiency test. (b) Schematic diagram of PM filtration for air.
(a)
(b)The recyclability of nanofiber gauze is also an important parameter to measure whether it can be used as an antifog screen for commercial production. Therefore, we performed a filtration efficiency cycle test and a gas permeability cycle test on the PMU nanofiber gauze for PM2.5, as shown in Figure7(a). The graph shows the removal efficiency curve of the sample-filtered PM2.5 for 10 cycles. After 10 cycles of filtration, the filtration efficiency was only reduced by about 0.4% (from 99.897% to 99.516%). In addition, the gas permeability error bars of the 10 test cycles of the TPU nanofiber gauze are shown in Figure 7(b). Before the first filter gas permeability measurement, the sample was measured to have a gas permeability of 1500 mm s-1 without the first filtration. The measurement pressure of the gas permeability test is 200 Pa, and the measurement interview is 20 cm2. After ten cycles of filtration, it can be seen that the change in gas permeability is slow, indicating that the air permeability is still good.Figure 7
(a) Cycle diagram of filtration efficiency of the sample. (b) Cycle diagram of ventilation rate of the sample.
(a)
(b)


## 3.1. Fiber Morphology Characterization

As shown in Figure2, we successfully prepared TPU nanofibers through a multineedle external liquid device. Figure 2(a) shows an optical picture of the fiber membrane, and it is apparent from the picture that the surface of the fiber membrane is uniform. Figures 2(b) and 2(c) are SEM images of fiber membranes at different magnifications, and Figure 2(d) is a fiber diameter distribution diagram of TPU fibers. From the fiber diameter distribution diagram, it can be seen that the average diameter of the TPU fiber membrane is 145.3 nm, the diameter of the TPU fiber prepared by other methods is finer, and the fiber distribution is uniform. The average diameter of the nanofibers of the traditional needle electrospun TPU prepared in our earlier stage is about 1094 nm [20]. Obviously, the diameter of nanofibers prepared by multineedle electrospinning is smaller.Figure 2
Morphology of e-spun TPU fiber membrane. (a) Optical image. (b, c) SEM pictures of the TPU fibers. (d) Diameter distribution of the fiber.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.2. TPU Fiber Gauze Hydrophobicity Test

The prepared TPU nanoyarn web was tested for contact angle, and its hydrophobic property was judged. The contact angle of water to the water was 138.9°, which proved that the TPU nanogauze had great hydrophobic properties, as shown in Figure3. The water contact angle of traditional electrospun TPU nanofibers is 129° [20]. The excellent hydrophobic properties of TPU nanofiber gauze provide a strong guarantee for rain-proof screens in subsequent real life, and the hydrophobic properties provide the possibility of recycling of TPU nanostencils and extend the cycle and service life. In order to further simulate the resistance of the material to different pollutants in rainy days, we explored the hydrophobic properties of different kinds of dye solutions. We observed the fiber membrane by optically photographing water droplets and different kinds of dye solutions (including rhodamine B, methylene blue, and methylene orange) onto the TPU nanoyarn net. The hydrophobic properties confirmed that the TPU nanofiber gauze has better hydrophobic properties for the abovementioned liquids, as shown in Figure 4.Figure 3
The water contact angle of the TPU fiber gauze.Figure 4
Optical photographs showing the hydrophobic angle characteristics of different types of dyes. (a) Water. (b) Rhodamine B. (c) Methylene blue. (d) Methylene orange.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.3. Transmittance Test

The transmittance test of the TPU nanofiber gauze was carried out. Figure5(a) shows an optical picture of the light transmission of a blank gauze, and the light transmission of the blank gauze is 80%. Figure 5(b) is a transparency optical photograph of the TPU nanofiber gauze. The optical fiber screen of the prepared nanofiber gauze was 56%, and the air filter screen with a general transmittance of 50% or more was able to pass sufficient light. It is proved to have excellent light transmittance. The TPU nanofiber film prepared by traditional electrostatic spinning has a light transmittance of 60%, which is not much different [21].Figure 5
Optical picture of transmittance. (a) Blank gauze. (b) TPU nanofiber gauze.
(a)
(b)


## 3.4. Filtration Performance and Permeability Test

Filtration efficiency is one of the important parameters for evaluating the performance of antifog gauze. Therefore, we conducted a filtration efficiency test on the prepared TPU nanofiber gauze. During the test, the temperature was 20°C, the relative humidity was 40.6%, the air flow rate was set to 2.0 m3 h-1, and the aerosol particles were used as PM contaminants. Figure 6 shows the filtration efficiency and filtration schematic of the TPU nanofiber gauze. Figure 6(a) shows the filtration efficiency of the sample is tested for 10 times. It can be seen from Figure 6(a) that the filtration effect of the sample is proportional to the particle size, and the larger the particle size, the more difficult it is to pass through the nanofiber membrane. When the particle diameter is ≥3.75 μm, the removal efficiency is 100%, and the pressure drop is only 20 Pa. For PM with smaller particle size, the removal effect is also higher, with a minimum of 96.3%. At the same time, it can be seen that the removal rate of PM2.5 by TPU nanofiber gauze is 99.897%. According to literature reports, the filtration efficiency of PM2.5 for TPU composite nanofiber membranes prepared by traditional electrostatic spinning technology is 99.654% [21]. Therefore, the nanofiber membrane prepared by the new multineedle electrostatic spinning technology has better filtration performance. Figure 6(b) is a schematic diagram of the effect of TPU nanofiber gauze on PM filtration of different particle sizes.Figure 6
Filtration performance of TPU nanofiber gauze. (a) The different times of filtration efficiency test. (b) Schematic diagram of PM filtration for air.
(a)
(b)The recyclability of nanofiber gauze is also an important parameter to measure whether it can be used as an antifog screen for commercial production. Therefore, we performed a filtration efficiency cycle test and a gas permeability cycle test on the PMU nanofiber gauze for PM2.5, as shown in Figure7(a). The graph shows the removal efficiency curve of the sample-filtered PM2.5 for 10 cycles. After 10 cycles of filtration, the filtration efficiency was only reduced by about 0.4% (from 99.897% to 99.516%). In addition, the gas permeability error bars of the 10 test cycles of the TPU nanofiber gauze are shown in Figure 7(b). Before the first filter gas permeability measurement, the sample was measured to have a gas permeability of 1500 mm s-1 without the first filtration. The measurement pressure of the gas permeability test is 200 Pa, and the measurement interview is 20 cm2. After ten cycles of filtration, it can be seen that the change in gas permeability is slow, indicating that the air permeability is still good.Figure 7
(a) Cycle diagram of filtration efficiency of the sample. (b) Cycle diagram of ventilation rate of the sample.
(a)
(b)


## 4. Conclusions

So far, multinozzle or multijet e-spinning technology is one of the most common methods to increase nanofiber production and promote large-scale production of e-spun fibers. In this work, a new multineedle e-spinning method has been proposed to prepare polymer nanofibers, which greatly improves the fiber production efficiency. The water contact angle of the prepared TPU nanofiber gauze was 138.9°, which proved that the sample had hydrophobicity. Particularly, the TPU nanofiber gauze prepared by this device has excellent recyclability and remarkable PM2.5 removal efficiency (99.897%), gas permeability (1500 mm s-1), and optical transparency (~56%). The new e-spinning device may be used for large-scale production of polymer nanofibers and antifog screens.



---

*Source: 4965438-2020-04-06.xml*