# Characteristics of Pepsin-Solubilised Collagen from the Skin of Splendid Squid (Loligo formosana)

Authors: Phanat Kittiphattanabawon; Sitthipong  Nalinanon; Soottawat Benjakul; Hideki Kishimura
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

Pepsin-solubilised collagen from the skin of splendid squid (SC) was isolated, partially purified by salt precipitation and dialysis prior to characterisation. The yield of SC was 75.3% (dry weight basis). SC with high purity was obtained as shown by the distinct UV absorption peak at 232 nm and high hydroxyproline content. Total sugar content of SC was 4.70% (dry weight basis), which was higher than that of collagen from calf skin (CC) (1.45% dry weight basis) (P<0.05). Based on SDS-PAGE and elution profile, SC might contain the mixed types of collagen (type SQ-I and type SQ-II), in which α- and β-chains were the major components. SC was rich in glycine and had high content of imino acids (189 residues/1000 residues). The degradation induced by chymotrypsin and lysyl endopeptidase was more pronounced in CC, compared with SC. The maximum transition temperature (Tmax) of SC was 34.1°C, which was about 7°C lower than that of CC. Fourier transform infrared spectra revealed that the triple-helical structure of SC was predominant with the copresence of carbohydrate moieties. Therefore, the skin of splendid squid, a byproduct from squid processing, can be an alternative source for collagen production.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Collagen is the fibrous protein that contributes to the unique physiological functions of connective tissues in skins, tendons, bones, cartilages, and so forth and is associated with toughness of mammalian muscle [1–3]. The structural unit of collagen is tropocollagen, a rod-shaped protein consisting of three polypeptides units (called α chains) intertwined to form a triple-helical structure [4]. Each polypeptide chain forms a left-handed helix and consists of repeating triplets (Gly-X-Y)n, where X and Y are, with a high possibility, proline or hydroxyproline [5].Generally, pig and cow skins and bones are the main sources of collagen and gelatin. The outbreak of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) has resulted in anxiety among users of cattle gelatin. Additionally, the collagen and gelatin obtained from pig skin and bones cannot be used due to the religious constraint [6]. As a consequence, the increasing attention of alternative sources for replacement of mammalian collagen has been paid. Seafood processing byproducts, particularly the skins, are alternative sources for collagen preparation. Collagens from several fish and cephalopods such as unicorn leatherjacket [7], arabesque greenling [8], brownbanded bamboo shark [2], cod [9], deep-sea redfish [10], bigeye snapper [11, 12], black drum [5], sheephead seabream [5], octopus [13], and cuttlefish [14] have been isolated and characterised.Squids have become an important fishery product in Thailand as well as other Southeast Asian countries and are mainly exported worldwide [15]. From the squid processing, the skin byproduct is generated in large quantity. It has been mainly used for fish meal or fertilizer with a low market value. Nagai et al. [14] reported that skin waste material from cuttlefish contained high amount of collagen. Hence, squid skin can be served as an alternative source of collagen. However, no information regarding the collagen from the skin of splendid squid (Loligo formosana) has been reported. Therefore, the objective of this study was to isolate and characterise the collagen from the skin of splendid squid (L. formosana), a byproduct from squid processing.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Chemicals

Bovine haemoglobin,β-mercaptoethanol (βME), pepsin from porcine stomach mucosa (EC 3.4.23.1) (750 units/mg dry matter), and type I collagen from calf skin were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA.). Coomassie Blue R-250 andN,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl ethylene diamine (TEMED) were procured from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hercules, CA, USA). Bovine serum albumin was obtained from Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland). High-molecular-weight protein marker was purchased from GE Healthcare UK Limited (Buckinghamshire, UK). TOYOPEARL CM-650M was purchased from Tosoh Corporation (Tokyo, Japan). α-Chymotrypsin from bovine pancreas (EC 3.4.21.1), lysyl endopeptidase (EC 3.4.21.50) fromAchromobacter lyticus, and type II, III, and V collagens from porcine cartilage, skin, and placenta, respectively, were obtained from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan).


### 2.2. Preparation of Splendid Squid Skin

Splendid squid (Loligo formosana) were obtained from the dock in Samutsakhon, Thailand. The squid were packed in polyethylene bag, kept in ice with a solid/ice ratio of 1 : 2 (w/v), and transported to the Faculty of Agro-Industry, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand, within 1 h. All procedures were performed at 0–4°C. Upon the arrival, the squid skin was removed and washed with cold water, drained, and cut into small pieces (0.5 × 0.5 cm2) using the scissor. To remove noncollagenous proteins, the skin was mixed with 0.1 M NaOH using a sample/alkaline solution ratio of 1 : 10 (w/v). The mixture was stirred continuously for 6 h. The alkaline solution was changed every 2 h. Then, the alkaline treated skin was washed with cold water until neutral or faintly basic pH of wash water was obtained. The treated skin was then defatted with 10% (v/v) butyl alcohol with a solid/solvent ratio of 1 : 10 (w/v) for 18 h and the solvent was changed every 6 h. Defatted skin was then washed with 10 volumes of cold water for 3 times prior to lyophilisation.


### 2.3. Isolation of Collagen from the Skin of Splendid Squid

Pepsin-solubilised collagen from the skin of splendid squid was isolated following the method of Nalinanon et al. [12] with some modifications. All procedures were performed at 4°C. To extract the collagen, the lyophilised skin was soaked in 0.5 M acetic acid with a sample/solution ratio of 1 : 250 (w/v) in the presence of porcine pepsin (10 g/100 g lyophilised skin). The mixture was gently stirred for 72 h, followed by centrifugation at 20,000 ×g for 1 h using the centrifuge (Sorvall Legend Mach 1.6R, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany). Then, the supernatant was immediately precipitated by the addition of NaCl to a final concentration of 2.6 M in 0.05 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.5). The mixture was allowed to stand for 1 h for pepsin inactivation. The resultant precipitate was collected by centrifugation at 20,000 ×g for 1 h and dissolved in 10 volumes of 0.5 M acetic acid. The solution obtained was dialysed against 10 volumes of 0.1 M acetic acid in a dialysis bag with a molecular weight cutoff of 14 kDa for 48 h with the change of dialysis solution every 6 h. Subsequently, the solution was dialysed with 60 volumes of distilled water. The changes of dialysis water were performed until neutral pH of dialysate was obtained. The dialysate was lyophilised and referred to as “pepsin-solubilised collagen from the skin of splendid squid, SC.” SC was subjected to analyses. The yield of collagen was calculated based on the weight of SC in comparison with that of dry defatted skin.


### 2.4. Characterisation of Collagen from the Skin of Splendid Squid

#### 2.4.1. Hydroxyproline Content

Collagen was dehydrated with acetone and then hydrolysed in 6 M HCl at 110°C for 24 h prior to the determination of hydroxyproline content using the colorimetric method as described by Nalinanon et al. [12]. The hydroxyproline content was calculated and expressed as mg/g collagen.


#### 2.4.2. Total Sugar Content

Total sugar content of collagen was determined according to the phenol-sulfuric method as described by Fournier [16] with a slight modification. Collagen was dissolved in 0.5 M acetic acid to obtain a final concentration of 6 mg/mL and further stirred until completely solubilised. To determine total sugar content, collagen sample (250 μL) was mixed with 500 μL of 4% phenol and 2.5 mL of 96% sulfuric acid. The mixture was allowed to stand at room temperature for 30 min. The absorbance of the reaction mixture was then measured at 490 nm. To calculate the concentration of sugar, the calibration curve was performed using D-glucose (0–0.4 mg/mL) as a standard. Total sugar content was calculated and expressed as % (dry weight basis).


#### 2.4.3. UV Absorption Measurement

Collagen was dissolved in 0.5 M acetic acid to obtain a concentration of 1 mg/mL. The solution was placed into a quartz cell with a path length of 1 cm. UV absorption spectrum of collagen was measured using a spectrophotometer (UV-1800, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Prior to measurement, the base line was set with 0.5 M acetic acid. The spectrum was obtained by scanning the wavelength in the range of 190–350 nm with a scan speed of 50 nm/min at room temperature.


#### 2.4.4. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

DSC analysis of collagen samples was carried out following the methods of Nalinanon et al. [12] with a slight modification. The samples were rehydrated by adding 0.05 M acetic acid to dried samples at a solid/solution ratio of 1 : 40 (w/v). The mixture was allowed to stand for 2 days at 4°C. DSC analysis was performed using a differential scanning calorimeter (Model DSC 7, Norwalk, CT, USA). Temperature calibration was done using the indium thermogram. The collagen solutions (5–10 mg) were accurately weighed into aluminium pans and sealed. The samples were scanned at 1°C/min over the range of 20–50°C using iced water as the cooling medium. An empty pan was used as the reference. The maximum transition temperature (Tmax) was estimated from the DSC thermogram.


#### 2.4.5. Amino Acid Analysis

Collagen was hydrolysed under reduced pressure in 4.0 M methanesulfonic acid containing 0.2% (v/v) 3-2(2-aminoethyl)indole at 115°C for 24 h. The hydrolysates were neutralised with 3.5 M NaOH and diluted with 0.2 M citrate buffer (pH 2.2). An aliquot of 0.4 mL was applied to an amino acid analyser (MLC-703; Atto Co., Tokyo, Japan).


#### 2.4.6. SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)

SDS-PAGE was performed by the method of Laemmli [17]. The samples were mixed with 5% (w/v) SDS and heated at 85°C for 1 h. The mixtures were then centrifuged at 8,500 ×g for 5 min to remove undissolved debris. Solubilised samples were mixed at 1 : 1 (v/v) ratio with the sample buffer (0.5 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, containing 4% (w/v) SDS, 20% (v/v) glycerol) in the presence of 10% (v/v) βME. Samples (15 μg protein) were loaded onto a polyacrylamide gel made of 7.5% or 5% separating gel and 4% stacking gel and subjected to electrophoresis at a constant current of 15 mA/gel, using a Mini-PROTEAN II unit (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Richmond, CA, USA). After electrophoresis, gels were fixed with a mixture of 50% (v/v) methanol and 10% (v/v) acetic acid for 45 min, followed by staining with 0.05% (w/v) Coomassie Blue R-250 in 15% (v/v) methanol and 5% (v/v) acetic acid for 3 h. Finally, gels were destained with the mixture of 30% (v/v) methanol and 10% (v/v) acetic acid for 45 min. High-molecular-weight protein markers (GE Healthcare UK Limited, Buckinghamshire, UK) were used to estimate the molecular weight of proteins. Gels were imaged using a Canon image scanner (CanoScan LiDE100, Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan).


#### 2.4.7. TOYOPEARL CM-650 Column Chromatography

TOYOPEARL CM-650 column chromatography was carried out according to the method of Kittiphattanabawon et al. [2] and Nalinanon et al. [8] with a slight modification. SC (20 mg) were dissolved in 5 mL of starting buffer (50 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 4.8 containing 2 M urea) and incubated at 60°C for 30 min. The mixtures were centrifuged at 20,000 ×g at room temperature (25-26°C) for 30 min. The supernatant was applied onto a TOYOPEARL CM-650 M column (1.0 × 5.0 cm) previously equilibrated with 10 volumes of the starting buffer at a flow rate of 30 mL/h. After loading, the unbound proteins were washed by the same buffer until A230 was less than 0.05. Elution was achieved with a linear gradient of 0–0.2 M NaCl in the same buffer at a flow rate of 30 mL/h with a total volume of 100 mL. The eluant was monitored at 230 nm and fractions (2 mL) were collected. The selected fractions were subjected to SDS-PAGE using 5% separating gel and 4% stacking gel as previously described.


#### 2.4.8. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy

Spectra of collagens were obtained by using a Bruker Model EQUINOX 55 FTIR spectrometer (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany) equipped with a deuterated l-alanine triglycine sulfate (DLATGS) detector. The Horizontal Attenuated Total Reflectance Accessory (HATR) was mounted into the sample compartment. The internal reflection crystal (Pike Technologies, Madison, WI, USA), which was made of zinc selenide, had a 45° angle of incidence to the IR beam. Spectra were acquired at a resolution of 4 cm−1 and the measurement range was 4000–600 cm−1 (mid-IR region) at room temperature. Automatic signals were collected in 32 scans at a resolution of 4 cm−1 and were ratioed against a background spectrum recorded from the clean, empty cell at 25°C. Analysis of spectral data was carried out using the OPUS 3.0 data collection software program (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany).


#### 2.4.9. Peptide Mapping

Peptide mappings of SC and CC were performed according to the method of Nalinanon et al. [8] with a slight modification.(1) Lysyl Endopeptidase Hydrolysis. The freeze-dried samples (3 mg) were dissolved in 0.5 mL of 0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.2 containing 5% (w/v) SDS. After the addition of 20 μL of the same buffer containing 0.1 μg of lysyl endopeptidase fromA. lyticus to collagen solutions, the reaction mixture was incubated at 37°C for 60 min. The reaction was terminated by subjecting the reaction mixture to boiling water for 10 min.(2) Chymotryptic Hydrolysis. The freeze-dried samples (3 mg) were suspended in 0.5 mL of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, containing 10 mM CaCl2. The collagen mixture was preincubated at 37°C for 15 min. Then, 20 μL of the same buffer containing 5 μg of chymotrypsin was added to collagen solution. The mixture was then incubated at 37°C for 5 min. The reaction was terminated by adding 0.5 mL of 5% (w/v) SDS (85°C) to the reaction mixture and boiling for 10 min.Peptides generated by the protease digestion were subjected to SDS-PAGE using 7.5% running gel and 4% stacking gel in the same manner as previously described.


### 2.5. Statistical Analysis

Experiments were performed in triplicate. Data were presented as means ± standard deviation and a probability value of <0.05 was considered significant. For pair comparison,t-test was used. SPSS statistic programme (SPSS 11.0 for Windows, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis.


## 2.1. Chemicals

Bovine haemoglobin,β-mercaptoethanol (βME), pepsin from porcine stomach mucosa (EC 3.4.23.1) (750 units/mg dry matter), and type I collagen from calf skin were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA.). Coomassie Blue R-250 andN,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl ethylene diamine (TEMED) were procured from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hercules, CA, USA). Bovine serum albumin was obtained from Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland). High-molecular-weight protein marker was purchased from GE Healthcare UK Limited (Buckinghamshire, UK). TOYOPEARL CM-650M was purchased from Tosoh Corporation (Tokyo, Japan). α-Chymotrypsin from bovine pancreas (EC 3.4.21.1), lysyl endopeptidase (EC 3.4.21.50) fromAchromobacter lyticus, and type II, III, and V collagens from porcine cartilage, skin, and placenta, respectively, were obtained from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan).


## 2.2. Preparation of Splendid Squid Skin

Splendid squid (Loligo formosana) were obtained from the dock in Samutsakhon, Thailand. The squid were packed in polyethylene bag, kept in ice with a solid/ice ratio of 1 : 2 (w/v), and transported to the Faculty of Agro-Industry, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand, within 1 h. All procedures were performed at 0–4°C. Upon the arrival, the squid skin was removed and washed with cold water, drained, and cut into small pieces (0.5 × 0.5 cm2) using the scissor. To remove noncollagenous proteins, the skin was mixed with 0.1 M NaOH using a sample/alkaline solution ratio of 1 : 10 (w/v). The mixture was stirred continuously for 6 h. The alkaline solution was changed every 2 h. Then, the alkaline treated skin was washed with cold water until neutral or faintly basic pH of wash water was obtained. The treated skin was then defatted with 10% (v/v) butyl alcohol with a solid/solvent ratio of 1 : 10 (w/v) for 18 h and the solvent was changed every 6 h. Defatted skin was then washed with 10 volumes of cold water for 3 times prior to lyophilisation.


## 2.3. Isolation of Collagen from the Skin of Splendid Squid

Pepsin-solubilised collagen from the skin of splendid squid was isolated following the method of Nalinanon et al. [12] with some modifications. All procedures were performed at 4°C. To extract the collagen, the lyophilised skin was soaked in 0.5 M acetic acid with a sample/solution ratio of 1 : 250 (w/v) in the presence of porcine pepsin (10 g/100 g lyophilised skin). The mixture was gently stirred for 72 h, followed by centrifugation at 20,000 ×g for 1 h using the centrifuge (Sorvall Legend Mach 1.6R, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany). Then, the supernatant was immediately precipitated by the addition of NaCl to a final concentration of 2.6 M in 0.05 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.5). The mixture was allowed to stand for 1 h for pepsin inactivation. The resultant precipitate was collected by centrifugation at 20,000 ×g for 1 h and dissolved in 10 volumes of 0.5 M acetic acid. The solution obtained was dialysed against 10 volumes of 0.1 M acetic acid in a dialysis bag with a molecular weight cutoff of 14 kDa for 48 h with the change of dialysis solution every 6 h. Subsequently, the solution was dialysed with 60 volumes of distilled water. The changes of dialysis water were performed until neutral pH of dialysate was obtained. The dialysate was lyophilised and referred to as “pepsin-solubilised collagen from the skin of splendid squid, SC.” SC was subjected to analyses. The yield of collagen was calculated based on the weight of SC in comparison with that of dry defatted skin.


## 2.4. Characterisation of Collagen from the Skin of Splendid Squid

### 2.4.1. Hydroxyproline Content

Collagen was dehydrated with acetone and then hydrolysed in 6 M HCl at 110°C for 24 h prior to the determination of hydroxyproline content using the colorimetric method as described by Nalinanon et al. [12]. The hydroxyproline content was calculated and expressed as mg/g collagen.


### 2.4.2. Total Sugar Content

Total sugar content of collagen was determined according to the phenol-sulfuric method as described by Fournier [16] with a slight modification. Collagen was dissolved in 0.5 M acetic acid to obtain a final concentration of 6 mg/mL and further stirred until completely solubilised. To determine total sugar content, collagen sample (250 μL) was mixed with 500 μL of 4% phenol and 2.5 mL of 96% sulfuric acid. The mixture was allowed to stand at room temperature for 30 min. The absorbance of the reaction mixture was then measured at 490 nm. To calculate the concentration of sugar, the calibration curve was performed using D-glucose (0–0.4 mg/mL) as a standard. Total sugar content was calculated and expressed as % (dry weight basis).


### 2.4.3. UV Absorption Measurement

Collagen was dissolved in 0.5 M acetic acid to obtain a concentration of 1 mg/mL. The solution was placed into a quartz cell with a path length of 1 cm. UV absorption spectrum of collagen was measured using a spectrophotometer (UV-1800, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Prior to measurement, the base line was set with 0.5 M acetic acid. The spectrum was obtained by scanning the wavelength in the range of 190–350 nm with a scan speed of 50 nm/min at room temperature.


### 2.4.4. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

DSC analysis of collagen samples was carried out following the methods of Nalinanon et al. [12] with a slight modification. The samples were rehydrated by adding 0.05 M acetic acid to dried samples at a solid/solution ratio of 1 : 40 (w/v). The mixture was allowed to stand for 2 days at 4°C. DSC analysis was performed using a differential scanning calorimeter (Model DSC 7, Norwalk, CT, USA). Temperature calibration was done using the indium thermogram. The collagen solutions (5–10 mg) were accurately weighed into aluminium pans and sealed. The samples were scanned at 1°C/min over the range of 20–50°C using iced water as the cooling medium. An empty pan was used as the reference. The maximum transition temperature (Tmax) was estimated from the DSC thermogram.


### 2.4.5. Amino Acid Analysis

Collagen was hydrolysed under reduced pressure in 4.0 M methanesulfonic acid containing 0.2% (v/v) 3-2(2-aminoethyl)indole at 115°C for 24 h. The hydrolysates were neutralised with 3.5 M NaOH and diluted with 0.2 M citrate buffer (pH 2.2). An aliquot of 0.4 mL was applied to an amino acid analyser (MLC-703; Atto Co., Tokyo, Japan).


### 2.4.6. SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)

SDS-PAGE was performed by the method of Laemmli [17]. The samples were mixed with 5% (w/v) SDS and heated at 85°C for 1 h. The mixtures were then centrifuged at 8,500 ×g for 5 min to remove undissolved debris. Solubilised samples were mixed at 1 : 1 (v/v) ratio with the sample buffer (0.5 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, containing 4% (w/v) SDS, 20% (v/v) glycerol) in the presence of 10% (v/v) βME. Samples (15 μg protein) were loaded onto a polyacrylamide gel made of 7.5% or 5% separating gel and 4% stacking gel and subjected to electrophoresis at a constant current of 15 mA/gel, using a Mini-PROTEAN II unit (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Richmond, CA, USA). After electrophoresis, gels were fixed with a mixture of 50% (v/v) methanol and 10% (v/v) acetic acid for 45 min, followed by staining with 0.05% (w/v) Coomassie Blue R-250 in 15% (v/v) methanol and 5% (v/v) acetic acid for 3 h. Finally, gels were destained with the mixture of 30% (v/v) methanol and 10% (v/v) acetic acid for 45 min. High-molecular-weight protein markers (GE Healthcare UK Limited, Buckinghamshire, UK) were used to estimate the molecular weight of proteins. Gels were imaged using a Canon image scanner (CanoScan LiDE100, Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan).


### 2.4.7. TOYOPEARL CM-650 Column Chromatography

TOYOPEARL CM-650 column chromatography was carried out according to the method of Kittiphattanabawon et al. [2] and Nalinanon et al. [8] with a slight modification. SC (20 mg) were dissolved in 5 mL of starting buffer (50 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 4.8 containing 2 M urea) and incubated at 60°C for 30 min. The mixtures were centrifuged at 20,000 ×g at room temperature (25-26°C) for 30 min. The supernatant was applied onto a TOYOPEARL CM-650 M column (1.0 × 5.0 cm) previously equilibrated with 10 volumes of the starting buffer at a flow rate of 30 mL/h. After loading, the unbound proteins were washed by the same buffer until A230 was less than 0.05. Elution was achieved with a linear gradient of 0–0.2 M NaCl in the same buffer at a flow rate of 30 mL/h with a total volume of 100 mL. The eluant was monitored at 230 nm and fractions (2 mL) were collected. The selected fractions were subjected to SDS-PAGE using 5% separating gel and 4% stacking gel as previously described.


### 2.4.8. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy

Spectra of collagens were obtained by using a Bruker Model EQUINOX 55 FTIR spectrometer (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany) equipped with a deuterated l-alanine triglycine sulfate (DLATGS) detector. The Horizontal Attenuated Total Reflectance Accessory (HATR) was mounted into the sample compartment. The internal reflection crystal (Pike Technologies, Madison, WI, USA), which was made of zinc selenide, had a 45° angle of incidence to the IR beam. Spectra were acquired at a resolution of 4 cm−1 and the measurement range was 4000–600 cm−1 (mid-IR region) at room temperature. Automatic signals were collected in 32 scans at a resolution of 4 cm−1 and were ratioed against a background spectrum recorded from the clean, empty cell at 25°C. Analysis of spectral data was carried out using the OPUS 3.0 data collection software program (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany).


### 2.4.9. Peptide Mapping

Peptide mappings of SC and CC were performed according to the method of Nalinanon et al. [8] with a slight modification.(1) Lysyl Endopeptidase Hydrolysis. The freeze-dried samples (3 mg) were dissolved in 0.5 mL of 0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.2 containing 5% (w/v) SDS. After the addition of 20 μL of the same buffer containing 0.1 μg of lysyl endopeptidase fromA. lyticus to collagen solutions, the reaction mixture was incubated at 37°C for 60 min. The reaction was terminated by subjecting the reaction mixture to boiling water for 10 min.(2) Chymotryptic Hydrolysis. The freeze-dried samples (3 mg) were suspended in 0.5 mL of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, containing 10 mM CaCl2. The collagen mixture was preincubated at 37°C for 15 min. Then, 20 μL of the same buffer containing 5 μg of chymotrypsin was added to collagen solution. The mixture was then incubated at 37°C for 5 min. The reaction was terminated by adding 0.5 mL of 5% (w/v) SDS (85°C) to the reaction mixture and boiling for 10 min.Peptides generated by the protease digestion were subjected to SDS-PAGE using 7.5% running gel and 4% stacking gel in the same manner as previously described.


## 2.4.1. Hydroxyproline Content

Collagen was dehydrated with acetone and then hydrolysed in 6 M HCl at 110°C for 24 h prior to the determination of hydroxyproline content using the colorimetric method as described by Nalinanon et al. [12]. The hydroxyproline content was calculated and expressed as mg/g collagen.


## 2.4.2. Total Sugar Content

Total sugar content of collagen was determined according to the phenol-sulfuric method as described by Fournier [16] with a slight modification. Collagen was dissolved in 0.5 M acetic acid to obtain a final concentration of 6 mg/mL and further stirred until completely solubilised. To determine total sugar content, collagen sample (250 μL) was mixed with 500 μL of 4% phenol and 2.5 mL of 96% sulfuric acid. The mixture was allowed to stand at room temperature for 30 min. The absorbance of the reaction mixture was then measured at 490 nm. To calculate the concentration of sugar, the calibration curve was performed using D-glucose (0–0.4 mg/mL) as a standard. Total sugar content was calculated and expressed as % (dry weight basis).


## 2.4.3. UV Absorption Measurement

Collagen was dissolved in 0.5 M acetic acid to obtain a concentration of 1 mg/mL. The solution was placed into a quartz cell with a path length of 1 cm. UV absorption spectrum of collagen was measured using a spectrophotometer (UV-1800, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Prior to measurement, the base line was set with 0.5 M acetic acid. The spectrum was obtained by scanning the wavelength in the range of 190–350 nm with a scan speed of 50 nm/min at room temperature.


## 2.4.4. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

DSC analysis of collagen samples was carried out following the methods of Nalinanon et al. [12] with a slight modification. The samples were rehydrated by adding 0.05 M acetic acid to dried samples at a solid/solution ratio of 1 : 40 (w/v). The mixture was allowed to stand for 2 days at 4°C. DSC analysis was performed using a differential scanning calorimeter (Model DSC 7, Norwalk, CT, USA). Temperature calibration was done using the indium thermogram. The collagen solutions (5–10 mg) were accurately weighed into aluminium pans and sealed. The samples were scanned at 1°C/min over the range of 20–50°C using iced water as the cooling medium. An empty pan was used as the reference. The maximum transition temperature (Tmax) was estimated from the DSC thermogram.


## 2.4.5. Amino Acid Analysis

Collagen was hydrolysed under reduced pressure in 4.0 M methanesulfonic acid containing 0.2% (v/v) 3-2(2-aminoethyl)indole at 115°C for 24 h. The hydrolysates were neutralised with 3.5 M NaOH and diluted with 0.2 M citrate buffer (pH 2.2). An aliquot of 0.4 mL was applied to an amino acid analyser (MLC-703; Atto Co., Tokyo, Japan).


## 2.4.6. SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)

SDS-PAGE was performed by the method of Laemmli [17]. The samples were mixed with 5% (w/v) SDS and heated at 85°C for 1 h. The mixtures were then centrifuged at 8,500 ×g for 5 min to remove undissolved debris. Solubilised samples were mixed at 1 : 1 (v/v) ratio with the sample buffer (0.5 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, containing 4% (w/v) SDS, 20% (v/v) glycerol) in the presence of 10% (v/v) βME. Samples (15 μg protein) were loaded onto a polyacrylamide gel made of 7.5% or 5% separating gel and 4% stacking gel and subjected to electrophoresis at a constant current of 15 mA/gel, using a Mini-PROTEAN II unit (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Richmond, CA, USA). After electrophoresis, gels were fixed with a mixture of 50% (v/v) methanol and 10% (v/v) acetic acid for 45 min, followed by staining with 0.05% (w/v) Coomassie Blue R-250 in 15% (v/v) methanol and 5% (v/v) acetic acid for 3 h. Finally, gels were destained with the mixture of 30% (v/v) methanol and 10% (v/v) acetic acid for 45 min. High-molecular-weight protein markers (GE Healthcare UK Limited, Buckinghamshire, UK) were used to estimate the molecular weight of proteins. Gels were imaged using a Canon image scanner (CanoScan LiDE100, Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan).


## 2.4.7. TOYOPEARL CM-650 Column Chromatography

TOYOPEARL CM-650 column chromatography was carried out according to the method of Kittiphattanabawon et al. [2] and Nalinanon et al. [8] with a slight modification. SC (20 mg) were dissolved in 5 mL of starting buffer (50 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 4.8 containing 2 M urea) and incubated at 60°C for 30 min. The mixtures were centrifuged at 20,000 ×g at room temperature (25-26°C) for 30 min. The supernatant was applied onto a TOYOPEARL CM-650 M column (1.0 × 5.0 cm) previously equilibrated with 10 volumes of the starting buffer at a flow rate of 30 mL/h. After loading, the unbound proteins were washed by the same buffer until A230 was less than 0.05. Elution was achieved with a linear gradient of 0–0.2 M NaCl in the same buffer at a flow rate of 30 mL/h with a total volume of 100 mL. The eluant was monitored at 230 nm and fractions (2 mL) were collected. The selected fractions were subjected to SDS-PAGE using 5% separating gel and 4% stacking gel as previously described.


## 2.4.8. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy

Spectra of collagens were obtained by using a Bruker Model EQUINOX 55 FTIR spectrometer (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany) equipped with a deuterated l-alanine triglycine sulfate (DLATGS) detector. The Horizontal Attenuated Total Reflectance Accessory (HATR) was mounted into the sample compartment. The internal reflection crystal (Pike Technologies, Madison, WI, USA), which was made of zinc selenide, had a 45° angle of incidence to the IR beam. Spectra were acquired at a resolution of 4 cm−1 and the measurement range was 4000–600 cm−1 (mid-IR region) at room temperature. Automatic signals were collected in 32 scans at a resolution of 4 cm−1 and were ratioed against a background spectrum recorded from the clean, empty cell at 25°C. Analysis of spectral data was carried out using the OPUS 3.0 data collection software program (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany).


## 2.4.9. Peptide Mapping

Peptide mappings of SC and CC were performed according to the method of Nalinanon et al. [8] with a slight modification.(1) Lysyl Endopeptidase Hydrolysis. The freeze-dried samples (3 mg) were dissolved in 0.5 mL of 0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.2 containing 5% (w/v) SDS. After the addition of 20 μL of the same buffer containing 0.1 μg of lysyl endopeptidase fromA. lyticus to collagen solutions, the reaction mixture was incubated at 37°C for 60 min. The reaction was terminated by subjecting the reaction mixture to boiling water for 10 min.(2) Chymotryptic Hydrolysis. The freeze-dried samples (3 mg) were suspended in 0.5 mL of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, containing 10 mM CaCl2. The collagen mixture was preincubated at 37°C for 15 min. Then, 20 μL of the same buffer containing 5 μg of chymotrypsin was added to collagen solution. The mixture was then incubated at 37°C for 5 min. The reaction was terminated by adding 0.5 mL of 5% (w/v) SDS (85°C) to the reaction mixture and boiling for 10 min.Peptides generated by the protease digestion were subjected to SDS-PAGE using 7.5% running gel and 4% stacking gel in the same manner as previously described.


## 2.5. Statistical Analysis

Experiments were performed in triplicate. Data were presented as means ± standard deviation and a probability value of <0.05 was considered significant. For pair comparison,t-test was used. SPSS statistic programme (SPSS 11.0 for Windows, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Yield and Characteristics of SC

Collagen from squid skin was extracted with the aid of pepsin with the yield of 75.3% (dry wt.) (Table1). Yield was markedly increased in comparison with acid solubilised collagen (6.27%) (data not shown). The result indicated that pepsin was effective in increasing the extraction efficacy of collagen. Hydroxyproline content in SC (98.5 mg/g dry wt.) was lower than that of CC (104 mg/g dry wt.). Rigby [18] reported that hydroxyproline contents vary with species, environment, and body temperature of fish. Both SC and CC contained the carbohydrate. Glucose and galactose are attached to hydroxylysine residues of the peptide chain by O-glycosidic bonds to form 2-O-α-D-glucosyl-O-β-D-galactosyl-hydroxylysine and O-β-D-galactosyl-hydroxylysine [19]. Glycosylgalactosyl hydroxylysine in collagen from sea cucumber was reported [20]. From UV-Vis spectra, both collagens had the same absorption peak at 232 nm. Very low absorbance at 280 nm of both SC and CC (data not shown) indicated the absence of noncollagenous proteins. Collagen commonly has a low amount of tyrosine, which could absorb UV-light at 280 nm [9]. Thus, collagens from the skin of splendid squid were obtained with negligible contamination of other proteins.Table 1
Yield and characteristics of collagen from the skin of splendid squid (SC) and type I collagen from calf skin (CC)†.
Characteristics
SC
CC
Yield (% dry weight)
75.3 ± 1.20
—
Hydroxyproline (mg/g dry sample)
98.5 ± 1.43a‡
104 ± 2.45b
Total sugar content (% dry weight)
4.70 ± 0.39b
1.45 ± 0.20a
UV absorption peak (nm)
232 ± 0.30a
232 ± 0.13a
T
m
a
x (°C)
34.1 ± 0.10a
40.8 ± 0.20b
Δ
H (J/g)
0.66 ± 0.04a
1.20 ± 0.07b
†Mean ± SD from triplicate determinations.
‡Different letters (a and b) in the same row indicate the significant difference (P<0.05).Based on thermal properties analysis, the maximum transition temperature (Tmax) and total denaturation enthalpy (ΔH) of SC and CC are presented in Table 1. Tmax and ΔH of SC (Tmax=34.1°C; ΔH=0.656 J/g) were lower than those found in CC (Tmax=40.8°C; ΔH=1.204 J/g) (P<0.05). This might be owing to the lower content of its imino acids (hydroxyproline and proline) (Table 2). SC showed higher thermal stability than collagens from cold water fish, including cod (15°C) and deep-sea redfish (16.1°C) [6, 10]. Thermal stability of SC was similar to that of collagen from tropical fish, including brownbanded bamboo shark skin (34.4°C), blacktip shark skin (34.2°C), black drum skin (34.2°C) and sheephead seabream (34°C) [2, 5, 21]. The difference in thermal properties amongst collagens from mammal, tropical fish, and cold water fish was correlated with their imino acid content (proline and hydroxyproline), body temperature, and environmental temperature [11, 22, 23]. Thermal stability of collagen is associated with the restriction of the secondary structure of the polypeptide chain governed by the pyrrolidine rings of proline and hydroxyproline and partially by the hydrogen bonding through the hydroxyl group of hydroxyproline [24–26].Table 2
Amino acid composition of collagen from the skin of splendid squid (SC) and type I collagen from calf skin (CC).
Amino acid
SC
CC
Alanine
88
119
Arginine
56
51
Aspartic acid/asparagine
57
45
Cysteine
0
0
Glutamic acid/glutamine
83
75
Glycine
331
330
Histidine
6
5
Isoleucine
19
11
Leucine
28
23
Lysine
12
26
Hydroxylysine
17
7
Methionine
14
6
Phenylalanine
11
3
Hydroxyproline
91
94
Proline
98
121
Serine
35
39
Threonine
25
18
Tyrosine
5
3
Tryptophan
1
3
Valine
23
21
Total
1000
1000
Imino acidsa
189
215
aImino acids include proline and hydroxyproline.


### 3.2. Protein Patterns and Subunit Composition of SC

Protein patterns of SC determined under reducing condition are shown in Figure1. SC comprised α- and β-chains as major components with low content of γ-chain. Protein pattern of SC was quite different from that of collagen types I, II, III, and V. Two different α-chains were presented in SC and α-chain with MW of 127 kDa was the dominant component. It indicated that SC might contain at least two types of collagen. From the elution profiles of SC on the TOYOPEARL CM-650 M column (Figure 2), single peak containing different collagen components was obtained. There were four distinct α-chains (bands a, b, c, and d) and cross-linked components (β- and γ-chains) (fraction numbers 26 and 28). The collagen components, especially α-chain, of SC were in accordance with those of collagen from the skin of squid (Todarodes pacificus), which contained two types of collagen, type SQ-I and type SQ-II [27]. Therefore, SC most likely consisted of type SQ-I and type SQ-II. However, the components of SC in the present study were quite different from those found in collagen from the skin of octopus (Octopus vulgaris) and cuttlefish (Sepia lycidas), which comprised two distinct α chains, α1 and α2, with a molar ratio of 2 : 1 [14, 28].Figure 1
SDS-PAGE pattern of collagen from the skin of splendid squid (SC) under reducing condition. HMC, M, I, II, III and V denote high-MW cross-linked components, high-MW protein markers, and collagen type I, type II, type III, and type V, respectively.Figure 2
Elution profile of collagen from the skin of splendid squid (SC) on the TOYOPEARL CM-650 M ion-exchange column. The fractions indicated by numbers were examined by SDS-PAGE using 5% separating gel and 4% stacking gel. HMC denotes high-MW cross-linked component.


### 3.3. Amino Acid Composition of SC and CC

The amino acid composition of SC and CC expressed as residues per 1000 total amino acid residues is shown in Table2. Both collagens had glycine as their major amino acid (330-331 residues/1000 residues) and are rich in alanine (88–119 residues/1000 residues), proline (98–121 residues/1000 residues), and hydroxyproline (91–94 residues/1000 residues). Generally, glycine is about one-third of the total amino acid residues. Proline and hydroxyproline constitute about one-fifth and alanine is for about one-ninth of the total amino acids in collagen [29]. Furthermore, they had relatively low contents of methionine, lysine, phenylalanine, hydroxylysine, histidine, tyrosine, and tryptophan and no cysteine. When comparing amino acid composition between both collagens, SC had much lower content of alanine and proline. The results were in agreement with collagen from octopus arm (Callistoctopus arakawai) and outer skin of cuttlefish (Sepia lycidas) [13, 14]. Additionally, the same results were also observed in collagen from the skin of other fish species such as arabesque greenling [8], blacktip and brownbanded bamboo shark [2, 21], bigeye snapper [11, 24], and unicorn leatherjacket [30]. The imino acid content (proline + hydroxyproline) of SC was 189 residues/1000 residues, which was much lower than that of calf skin collagen (215 residues/1000 residues). However, it was much higher than that of skin collagen from cold water fish species (154–160 residues/1000 residues) such as cod [9], arabesque greenling [8], and deep-sea redfish [10]. The imino acid of fish collagens has been known to correlate with the water temperature of their normal habitat [1]. The sensitivity of collagen to heat is associated with its superhelical structure that is maintained by the conformational restrictions imposed by the pyrrolidine rings of the imino acids (hydroxyproline and proline) [26]. Hydroxyproline plays an important role in stabilization of the helix structure by preventing rotation of the N-C bond [1]. With reference to hydroxyproline content, the conversion factor of hydroxyproline to collagen from the skin of splendid squid was calculated to be 9.20. The conversion factors of collagen from other sources such as ornate threadfin bream (12.72) [31] and Baltic cod skin (14.7) [6] have been reported. This factor might be useful for estimation of the collagen content in raw material and the yield of extraction as well as purity assessment of resultant collagen.


### 3.4. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectra of SC and CC

FTIR spectra in the range 4000–650 cm−1 of SC and CC are presented in Figure 3. SC exhibited FTIR spectrum in which the absorption bands were situated in the amide band region, including the peak of amide I, amide II, amide III, amide A, and amide B. The wavenumber of each amide band was quite similar to that found in collagens from the skin of other fish [2, 8, 21, 24, 32]. FTIR spectra of both collagens were slightly different. It might be caused by the difference in extraction process used, their amino acid compositions, and amino acid sequence between both collagens. Amide A bands of SC and CC were observed at 3290 and 3296 cm−1, respectively. This band is generally associated with the N-H stretching vibration and shows the existence of hydrogen bonds. Doyle et al. [33] reported that a free N-H stretching vibration commonly occurs in the range of 3400–3440 cm−1. When the NH group of a peptide is involved in a hydrogen bond, the position is shifted to lower frequencies. Amide B band of SC (2921 cm−1) and CC (2933 cm−1) was related to asymmetrical stretch of CH2 stretching vibration [34]. The differences in wavenumber and amplitude of amides A and B found in SC and CC indicated that secondary structure of both collagens might be different in some extents.Figure 3
FTIR spectra of collagen from the skin of splendid squid (SC) and type I collagen from calf skin (CC).Amides I, II, and III peak of SC was found at wavenumber of 1643, 1541, and 1233 cm−1, respectively. Payne and Veis reported that [35] amide I peak associated with C=O stretching vibration or hydrogen bond coupled with COO−. Moreover, it is a sensitive marker for the secondary structure of proteins analysis in FTIR analysis [36], while amide II peak resulted from N-H bending vibration coupled with CN stretching vibration [37]. Generally, amides I, II and III of peptide linkage have been found at 1600–1690, 1480–1575, and 1229–1301 cm−1, respectively [37]. Muyonga et al. [32] reported that shifts of amides I, II, and III peaks to lower wavenumbers are associated with increased intermolecular interactions (by hydrogen bonding) in collagen. The ratio between amide III and 1454 cm−1 peak of SC was 1.02. Generally, the ratio of approximately 1.0 reveals the triple-helical structure of collagens [38]. The result indicated that the triple helical structure might be slightly affected by pepsin digestion during collagen extraction. When pepsin cleaved telopeptide regions of tropocollagen, the secondary structure of the resulting PSC might be altered to some degree [24, 39]. Collagen from the skin of splendid squid exhibited absorptions at 1031, 1060, and 1081 cm−1, which arise from the C-OH stretching vibrations of the carbohydrate moieties attached to the protein [40]. The similar result was also found in CC. The result suggested that the collagens might contain carbohydrates, which are attached to hydroxylysine residues of the polypeptide chain by O-glycosidic bonds. The result was also in accordance with total sugar content (Table 1).


### 3.5. Peptide Mapping of SC and CC

The peptide maps of SC digested by chymotrypsin or lysyl endopeptidase, in comparison with that of CC, are shown in Figure4. Major components, including α, β-, γ-chains and high-MW cross-linked components, of SC were hydrolysed into degradation peptides with MW of 68.3, 53.2, 47.8, 38.7, and 34.7 kDa and low MW peptides (Lane 4), whilst CC was hydrolysed into MW 108.6, 100.4, 85.5, 71.9, 67.4, and 38.7 kDa and low MW components after being treated with chymotrypsin (Lane 5). For peptide maps of collagens digested by lysyl endopeptidase, major components of CC were much degraded into lower MW peptides, especially peptides with MW of 33.8 kDa and lower MW components (Lane 6). In contrast, lower number of degradation bands was found in SC (Lane 7). The result suggested that SC was more tolerant to hydrolysis by lysyl endopeptidase than CC. This might be due to the higher content of lysine in CC (Table 2). Chymotrypsin catalyses the hydrolysis of peptide bonds on the carboxyl side of hydrophobic amino acid residues, such as phenylalanine, tyrosine, tryptophan, and leucine [41], whilst lysyl endopeptidase prefers to hydrolyse peptide bonds at the carboxyl side of lysyl residues [42]. Due to the specificity of cleavage sites of both proteases, the marked difference in peptide maps of SC and CC was observed. The result revealed that primary structure of SC and CC was completely different, especially in terms of their sequence and the composition of amino acids.Figure 4
Peptide maps of collagen from the skin of splendid squid (SC) and type I collagen from calf skin (CC) digested by lysyl endopeptidase or chymotrypsin. M and HMC denote high-MW protein markers and high-MW cross-linked components, respectively.


## 3.1. Yield and Characteristics of SC

Collagen from squid skin was extracted with the aid of pepsin with the yield of 75.3% (dry wt.) (Table1). Yield was markedly increased in comparison with acid solubilised collagen (6.27%) (data not shown). The result indicated that pepsin was effective in increasing the extraction efficacy of collagen. Hydroxyproline content in SC (98.5 mg/g dry wt.) was lower than that of CC (104 mg/g dry wt.). Rigby [18] reported that hydroxyproline contents vary with species, environment, and body temperature of fish. Both SC and CC contained the carbohydrate. Glucose and galactose are attached to hydroxylysine residues of the peptide chain by O-glycosidic bonds to form 2-O-α-D-glucosyl-O-β-D-galactosyl-hydroxylysine and O-β-D-galactosyl-hydroxylysine [19]. Glycosylgalactosyl hydroxylysine in collagen from sea cucumber was reported [20]. From UV-Vis spectra, both collagens had the same absorption peak at 232 nm. Very low absorbance at 280 nm of both SC and CC (data not shown) indicated the absence of noncollagenous proteins. Collagen commonly has a low amount of tyrosine, which could absorb UV-light at 280 nm [9]. Thus, collagens from the skin of splendid squid were obtained with negligible contamination of other proteins.Table 1
Yield and characteristics of collagen from the skin of splendid squid (SC) and type I collagen from calf skin (CC)†.
Characteristics
SC
CC
Yield (% dry weight)
75.3 ± 1.20
—
Hydroxyproline (mg/g dry sample)
98.5 ± 1.43a‡
104 ± 2.45b
Total sugar content (% dry weight)
4.70 ± 0.39b
1.45 ± 0.20a
UV absorption peak (nm)
232 ± 0.30a
232 ± 0.13a
T
m
a
x (°C)
34.1 ± 0.10a
40.8 ± 0.20b
Δ
H (J/g)
0.66 ± 0.04a
1.20 ± 0.07b
†Mean ± SD from triplicate determinations.
‡Different letters (a and b) in the same row indicate the significant difference (P<0.05).Based on thermal properties analysis, the maximum transition temperature (Tmax) and total denaturation enthalpy (ΔH) of SC and CC are presented in Table 1. Tmax and ΔH of SC (Tmax=34.1°C; ΔH=0.656 J/g) were lower than those found in CC (Tmax=40.8°C; ΔH=1.204 J/g) (P<0.05). This might be owing to the lower content of its imino acids (hydroxyproline and proline) (Table 2). SC showed higher thermal stability than collagens from cold water fish, including cod (15°C) and deep-sea redfish (16.1°C) [6, 10]. Thermal stability of SC was similar to that of collagen from tropical fish, including brownbanded bamboo shark skin (34.4°C), blacktip shark skin (34.2°C), black drum skin (34.2°C) and sheephead seabream (34°C) [2, 5, 21]. The difference in thermal properties amongst collagens from mammal, tropical fish, and cold water fish was correlated with their imino acid content (proline and hydroxyproline), body temperature, and environmental temperature [11, 22, 23]. Thermal stability of collagen is associated with the restriction of the secondary structure of the polypeptide chain governed by the pyrrolidine rings of proline and hydroxyproline and partially by the hydrogen bonding through the hydroxyl group of hydroxyproline [24–26].Table 2
Amino acid composition of collagen from the skin of splendid squid (SC) and type I collagen from calf skin (CC).
Amino acid
SC
CC
Alanine
88
119
Arginine
56
51
Aspartic acid/asparagine
57
45
Cysteine
0
0
Glutamic acid/glutamine
83
75
Glycine
331
330
Histidine
6
5
Isoleucine
19
11
Leucine
28
23
Lysine
12
26
Hydroxylysine
17
7
Methionine
14
6
Phenylalanine
11
3
Hydroxyproline
91
94
Proline
98
121
Serine
35
39
Threonine
25
18
Tyrosine
5
3
Tryptophan
1
3
Valine
23
21
Total
1000
1000
Imino acidsa
189
215
aImino acids include proline and hydroxyproline.


## 3.2. Protein Patterns and Subunit Composition of SC

Protein patterns of SC determined under reducing condition are shown in Figure1. SC comprised α- and β-chains as major components with low content of γ-chain. Protein pattern of SC was quite different from that of collagen types I, II, III, and V. Two different α-chains were presented in SC and α-chain with MW of 127 kDa was the dominant component. It indicated that SC might contain at least two types of collagen. From the elution profiles of SC on the TOYOPEARL CM-650 M column (Figure 2), single peak containing different collagen components was obtained. There were four distinct α-chains (bands a, b, c, and d) and cross-linked components (β- and γ-chains) (fraction numbers 26 and 28). The collagen components, especially α-chain, of SC were in accordance with those of collagen from the skin of squid (Todarodes pacificus), which contained two types of collagen, type SQ-I and type SQ-II [27]. Therefore, SC most likely consisted of type SQ-I and type SQ-II. However, the components of SC in the present study were quite different from those found in collagen from the skin of octopus (Octopus vulgaris) and cuttlefish (Sepia lycidas), which comprised two distinct α chains, α1 and α2, with a molar ratio of 2 : 1 [14, 28].Figure 1
SDS-PAGE pattern of collagen from the skin of splendid squid (SC) under reducing condition. HMC, M, I, II, III and V denote high-MW cross-linked components, high-MW protein markers, and collagen type I, type II, type III, and type V, respectively.Figure 2
Elution profile of collagen from the skin of splendid squid (SC) on the TOYOPEARL CM-650 M ion-exchange column. The fractions indicated by numbers were examined by SDS-PAGE using 5% separating gel and 4% stacking gel. HMC denotes high-MW cross-linked component.


## 3.3. Amino Acid Composition of SC and CC

The amino acid composition of SC and CC expressed as residues per 1000 total amino acid residues is shown in Table2. Both collagens had glycine as their major amino acid (330-331 residues/1000 residues) and are rich in alanine (88–119 residues/1000 residues), proline (98–121 residues/1000 residues), and hydroxyproline (91–94 residues/1000 residues). Generally, glycine is about one-third of the total amino acid residues. Proline and hydroxyproline constitute about one-fifth and alanine is for about one-ninth of the total amino acids in collagen [29]. Furthermore, they had relatively low contents of methionine, lysine, phenylalanine, hydroxylysine, histidine, tyrosine, and tryptophan and no cysteine. When comparing amino acid composition between both collagens, SC had much lower content of alanine and proline. The results were in agreement with collagen from octopus arm (Callistoctopus arakawai) and outer skin of cuttlefish (Sepia lycidas) [13, 14]. Additionally, the same results were also observed in collagen from the skin of other fish species such as arabesque greenling [8], blacktip and brownbanded bamboo shark [2, 21], bigeye snapper [11, 24], and unicorn leatherjacket [30]. The imino acid content (proline + hydroxyproline) of SC was 189 residues/1000 residues, which was much lower than that of calf skin collagen (215 residues/1000 residues). However, it was much higher than that of skin collagen from cold water fish species (154–160 residues/1000 residues) such as cod [9], arabesque greenling [8], and deep-sea redfish [10]. The imino acid of fish collagens has been known to correlate with the water temperature of their normal habitat [1]. The sensitivity of collagen to heat is associated with its superhelical structure that is maintained by the conformational restrictions imposed by the pyrrolidine rings of the imino acids (hydroxyproline and proline) [26]. Hydroxyproline plays an important role in stabilization of the helix structure by preventing rotation of the N-C bond [1]. With reference to hydroxyproline content, the conversion factor of hydroxyproline to collagen from the skin of splendid squid was calculated to be 9.20. The conversion factors of collagen from other sources such as ornate threadfin bream (12.72) [31] and Baltic cod skin (14.7) [6] have been reported. This factor might be useful for estimation of the collagen content in raw material and the yield of extraction as well as purity assessment of resultant collagen.


## 3.4. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectra of SC and CC

FTIR spectra in the range 4000–650 cm−1 of SC and CC are presented in Figure 3. SC exhibited FTIR spectrum in which the absorption bands were situated in the amide band region, including the peak of amide I, amide II, amide III, amide A, and amide B. The wavenumber of each amide band was quite similar to that found in collagens from the skin of other fish [2, 8, 21, 24, 32]. FTIR spectra of both collagens were slightly different. It might be caused by the difference in extraction process used, their amino acid compositions, and amino acid sequence between both collagens. Amide A bands of SC and CC were observed at 3290 and 3296 cm−1, respectively. This band is generally associated with the N-H stretching vibration and shows the existence of hydrogen bonds. Doyle et al. [33] reported that a free N-H stretching vibration commonly occurs in the range of 3400–3440 cm−1. When the NH group of a peptide is involved in a hydrogen bond, the position is shifted to lower frequencies. Amide B band of SC (2921 cm−1) and CC (2933 cm−1) was related to asymmetrical stretch of CH2 stretching vibration [34]. The differences in wavenumber and amplitude of amides A and B found in SC and CC indicated that secondary structure of both collagens might be different in some extents.Figure 3
FTIR spectra of collagen from the skin of splendid squid (SC) and type I collagen from calf skin (CC).Amides I, II, and III peak of SC was found at wavenumber of 1643, 1541, and 1233 cm−1, respectively. Payne and Veis reported that [35] amide I peak associated with C=O stretching vibration or hydrogen bond coupled with COO−. Moreover, it is a sensitive marker for the secondary structure of proteins analysis in FTIR analysis [36], while amide II peak resulted from N-H bending vibration coupled with CN stretching vibration [37]. Generally, amides I, II and III of peptide linkage have been found at 1600–1690, 1480–1575, and 1229–1301 cm−1, respectively [37]. Muyonga et al. [32] reported that shifts of amides I, II, and III peaks to lower wavenumbers are associated with increased intermolecular interactions (by hydrogen bonding) in collagen. The ratio between amide III and 1454 cm−1 peak of SC was 1.02. Generally, the ratio of approximately 1.0 reveals the triple-helical structure of collagens [38]. The result indicated that the triple helical structure might be slightly affected by pepsin digestion during collagen extraction. When pepsin cleaved telopeptide regions of tropocollagen, the secondary structure of the resulting PSC might be altered to some degree [24, 39]. Collagen from the skin of splendid squid exhibited absorptions at 1031, 1060, and 1081 cm−1, which arise from the C-OH stretching vibrations of the carbohydrate moieties attached to the protein [40]. The similar result was also found in CC. The result suggested that the collagens might contain carbohydrates, which are attached to hydroxylysine residues of the polypeptide chain by O-glycosidic bonds. The result was also in accordance with total sugar content (Table 1).


## 3.5. Peptide Mapping of SC and CC

The peptide maps of SC digested by chymotrypsin or lysyl endopeptidase, in comparison with that of CC, are shown in Figure4. Major components, including α, β-, γ-chains and high-MW cross-linked components, of SC were hydrolysed into degradation peptides with MW of 68.3, 53.2, 47.8, 38.7, and 34.7 kDa and low MW peptides (Lane 4), whilst CC was hydrolysed into MW 108.6, 100.4, 85.5, 71.9, 67.4, and 38.7 kDa and low MW components after being treated with chymotrypsin (Lane 5). For peptide maps of collagens digested by lysyl endopeptidase, major components of CC were much degraded into lower MW peptides, especially peptides with MW of 33.8 kDa and lower MW components (Lane 6). In contrast, lower number of degradation bands was found in SC (Lane 7). The result suggested that SC was more tolerant to hydrolysis by lysyl endopeptidase than CC. This might be due to the higher content of lysine in CC (Table 2). Chymotrypsin catalyses the hydrolysis of peptide bonds on the carboxyl side of hydrophobic amino acid residues, such as phenylalanine, tyrosine, tryptophan, and leucine [41], whilst lysyl endopeptidase prefers to hydrolyse peptide bonds at the carboxyl side of lysyl residues [42]. Due to the specificity of cleavage sites of both proteases, the marked difference in peptide maps of SC and CC was observed. The result revealed that primary structure of SC and CC was completely different, especially in terms of their sequence and the composition of amino acids.Figure 4
Peptide maps of collagen from the skin of splendid squid (SC) and type I collagen from calf skin (CC) digested by lysyl endopeptidase or chymotrypsin. M and HMC denote high-MW protein markers and high-MW cross-linked components, respectively.


## 4. Conclusion

Collagen could be extracted from the skin of splendid squid with the aid of pepsin. The resultant collagen was glycoprotein and comprised SQ-I and SQ-II components. However, identification of collagen type using additional separating technique or immunochemical detection or enzymatic treatment should be further conducted. The information gained from this study is beneficial for utilisation of squid skin byproduct in food, nutraceutical and cosmetic applications.



---

*Source: 482354-2015-12-30.xml*