# Synthesis, CP-MAS NMR Characterization, and Antibacterial Activities of Glycine and Histidine Complexes of Cd(SeCN)2 and Hg(SeCN)2

Authors: Bassem A. Al-Maythalony; M. Monim-ul-Mehboob; Mohammed I. M. Wazeer; Anvarhusein A. Isab; M. Nasiruzzaman Shaikh; Saleh Altuwaijri
Journal: Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

The synthesis and characterization of cadmium and mercury complexes of selenocyanate of the type [(L)M(SeCN)2] are described, where L is L-Histidine (His) or L-Glycine (Gly) and M is Cd2+ or Hg2+. These complexes are obtained by the reaction of 1 equivalent of respective amino acids with metal diselenocyanate precursor in a mixture of solvents (methanol : water = 1 : 1). These synthesized compounds are characterized by analytical and various spectroscopic techniques such as elemental analysis (EA), IR, H,1 and C13 NMR in solution and in the solid state for C13 and N15. The in vitro antibacterial activities of these complexes have been investigated with standard type cultures of Escherichia coli (MTCC 443), Klebsiella pneumoniae (MTCC 109), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MTCC 1688), Salmonella typhi (MTCC 733), and Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC 737).


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Since the metal ions play vital roles in a number of biological processes such as biomolecules stabilizations, enzyme regulations, transportation of fluids through transmembrane channels, and so forth [1–3], numerous metal ions amino acids complexes also act as potent antifungal, antibacterial, and anticancer drugs [4–6]. Therefore, the extensive studies of these metallic species have been dedicated to understand the impact on living systems. It is well known that metal-binding proteins cover a large fraction of the total protein, and they are actively participating in several essential life processes [2, 3]. Therefore, understanding of the physicochemical and biochemical properties of  metals with amino acids becomes indispensible and a broad area of research for several years [7–11].Among all amino acids found in nature, Histidine is often found as a ligand in various types of metalloenzymes because it is the key amino acids residue in many enzymatic reactions [12]. This is may be due to its stereochemical location of the coordinating atom in Histidine. The Histidine skeleton contains the imidazole side group having two nitrogen atoms capable of participating in metal-ligand coordination sphere thereby it can take on various metal-bound forms in proteins. Thus, it is important to know the coordination modes of the Histidine (His) and Glycine (Gly) ligands to understand the reaction mechanism of metalloenzymes [13].The coordination modes of various metal ions with amino acids have been the topic of discussion for a long period of time, and the ideas to get the binding modes are not easy to predict for amino acids with large side chain such as Histidine [16], because of different types of donor atoms present in amino acid backbone. In this point it has become necessary to study its active sites and binding affinity to transition metals at both theoretical and experimental levels. In line with efforts made by theoretical studies it has appeared that the stereochemical suitability of the metal ions play a critical role in determining the location of bond formations [17].Selenocyanate ligand can have versatile binding modes [18, 19]; nevertheless soft Se center is expected to coordinate more preferably to soft metals leaving the harder N uncoordinated [20, 21].In order to gain better understanding of the interaction of the metal ions with macromolecules involving amino acids, knowledge of the structure and the energetic of the metal ions coordination to amino acids are required. In an effort to obtain a more complete picture, we have synthesized a number of hitherto unknown cadmium and mercury selenocyanate complexes and their characterization using various important spectroscopic techniques.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. General Remarks

### 2.2. Preparation of Cd(II) and Hg(II) Complexes

A solution of CdCl2 in 10 mL dist. water was mixed with a stoichiometrically equivalent amount of ligand (Histidine or Glycine) in 10 mL solvent mixture (methanol : water = 1 : 1 in volume), produced solution stirred for 30 min, then two equivalents KSeCN water solution was added, the resulting mixture fluxed with nitrogen gas with stirring for 15 min then heat it for ~1.5 hour at 70°C. The product was filtered and dried. The same procedure was applied for mercury complexes using HgCl2 instead of CdCl2.


### 2.3. Spectroscopic Measurements

The measurements of solid-state IR and solution NMR were recorded as described in the literature [22, 23]. The solution NMR chemical shifts of ligands along with corresponding complexes are given in Tables 3 and 4.


### 2.4. Solid-State NMR Studies

Natural abundance13C solid-state NMR spectra were obtained on a JEOL LAMBDA 500 spectrometer operating at 110.85 MHz, corresponding to a magnetic field of 11.74 T, at ambient temperature of 25°C. Samples were packed into 6 mm zirconia rotors. Cross-polarization and high power decoupling were employed. Pulse delay of 7.0 s and a contact time of 5.0 ms were used for carbon observations in the CPMAS experiments, whereas the pulse delay of 10 s and a contact time of 6.0 ms were used in the selenium observation. The magic angle spinning rates were from 3000 to 5000 Hz. 13C chemical shifts were referenced to TMS by setting the high-frequency isotropic peak of solid adamantane to 38.48 ppm.The15N NMR spectrum was recorded at 50.55 MHz using 15NH4 NO3 as external reference, which lies at −358.62 ppm relative to pure MeNO2 [24]. The spectral conditions for 15N were 32 K data points, 0.721 sec acquisition time, 2.50 sec delay time, 60° pulse angle, and approximately 5000 scans. The chemical shift of nitrogen was initially referenced with respect to liquid NH3, by setting the 15N peak in enriched solid 15NH4Cl to 40.73 ppm [25] and then converted to the standard nitromethane by a shift of −380.0 ppm [24] for ammonia. The 13C and 15N spectra containing spinning side-band manifolds were analyzed using a computer program WSOLIDS developed at Dalhousie and Tubingen universities [26].


### 2.5. Computational Study

Geometry optimization was done for the built structures and optimized by DFT level of theory with LanL2DZ (Los Alamos ECP plus double zeta) [27, 28] basis sets using Gaussian 09, Revision A. 1 program package [29].


### 2.6. Test of Bacterial Strains

Standard type cultures ofEscherichia coli (MTCC 443), Klebsiella pneumoniae (MTCC 109), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MTCC 1688), Salmonella typhi (MTCC 733), and Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC 737) were obtained from Microbial Type Culture Collection (MTCC)  Chandigarh, India). The agar well-diffusion technique [30] was used to screen the antibacterial activity. In vitro antibacterial activities were screened by using nutrient agar plates obtained from HiMedia (Mumbai, India). The plates were prepared by pouring 20 mL of molten media into a sterile Petri dish and allowed to solidify for 5 minutes (Table 1). A sterile cork borer of diameter 6.0 mm was used to make wells in the agar plates. Inoculums were swabbed uniformly on the surface of agar plates. 0.1 mg/well were loaded on 6.00 mm diameter wells. The plates were allowed to stand for 1 h for diffusion then incubated at 37°C for 24 hrs. At the end of incubation, inhibition zones were measured.Table 1
Elemental analysis of the prepared complexes.
Complex
M. Pt. (C)
Found (Calcd.)%
H
C
N
(Gly)Cd(SeCN)2
Decomp. at 184
1.32 (1.27)
12.15 (12.09)
10.78 (10.57)
(Gly)Hg(SeCN)2
>300
1.10 (1.04)
10.04 (9.89)
9.00 (8.65)
(His)Cd(SeCN)2
Decomp. > 205
2.00 (1.90)
20.44 (20.12)
14.88 (14.67)
(His)Hg(SeCN)2
Decomp. > 140
1.70 (1.60)
17.11 (16.99)
12.64 (12.38)


## 2.1. General Remarks

## 2.2. Preparation of Cd(II) and Hg(II) Complexes

A solution of CdCl2 in 10 mL dist. water was mixed with a stoichiometrically equivalent amount of ligand (Histidine or Glycine) in 10 mL solvent mixture (methanol : water = 1 : 1 in volume), produced solution stirred for 30 min, then two equivalents KSeCN water solution was added, the resulting mixture fluxed with nitrogen gas with stirring for 15 min then heat it for ~1.5 hour at 70°C. The product was filtered and dried. The same procedure was applied for mercury complexes using HgCl2 instead of CdCl2.


## 2.3. Spectroscopic Measurements

The measurements of solid-state IR and solution NMR were recorded as described in the literature [22, 23]. The solution NMR chemical shifts of ligands along with corresponding complexes are given in Tables 3 and 4.


## 2.4. Solid-State NMR Studies

Natural abundance13C solid-state NMR spectra were obtained on a JEOL LAMBDA 500 spectrometer operating at 110.85 MHz, corresponding to a magnetic field of 11.74 T, at ambient temperature of 25°C. Samples were packed into 6 mm zirconia rotors. Cross-polarization and high power decoupling were employed. Pulse delay of 7.0 s and a contact time of 5.0 ms were used for carbon observations in the CPMAS experiments, whereas the pulse delay of 10 s and a contact time of 6.0 ms were used in the selenium observation. The magic angle spinning rates were from 3000 to 5000 Hz. 13C chemical shifts were referenced to TMS by setting the high-frequency isotropic peak of solid adamantane to 38.48 ppm.The15N NMR spectrum was recorded at 50.55 MHz using 15NH4 NO3 as external reference, which lies at −358.62 ppm relative to pure MeNO2 [24]. The spectral conditions for 15N were 32 K data points, 0.721 sec acquisition time, 2.50 sec delay time, 60° pulse angle, and approximately 5000 scans. The chemical shift of nitrogen was initially referenced with respect to liquid NH3, by setting the 15N peak in enriched solid 15NH4Cl to 40.73 ppm [25] and then converted to the standard nitromethane by a shift of −380.0 ppm [24] for ammonia. The 13C and 15N spectra containing spinning side-band manifolds were analyzed using a computer program WSOLIDS developed at Dalhousie and Tubingen universities [26].


## 2.5. Computational Study

Geometry optimization was done for the built structures and optimized by DFT level of theory with LanL2DZ (Los Alamos ECP plus double zeta) [27, 28] basis sets using Gaussian 09, Revision A. 1 program package [29].


## 2.6. Test of Bacterial Strains

Standard type cultures ofEscherichia coli (MTCC 443), Klebsiella pneumoniae (MTCC 109), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MTCC 1688), Salmonella typhi (MTCC 733), and Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC 737) were obtained from Microbial Type Culture Collection (MTCC)  Chandigarh, India). The agar well-diffusion technique [30] was used to screen the antibacterial activity. In vitro antibacterial activities were screened by using nutrient agar plates obtained from HiMedia (Mumbai, India). The plates were prepared by pouring 20 mL of molten media into a sterile Petri dish and allowed to solidify for 5 minutes (Table 1). A sterile cork borer of diameter 6.0 mm was used to make wells in the agar plates. Inoculums were swabbed uniformly on the surface of agar plates. 0.1 mg/well were loaded on 6.00 mm diameter wells. The plates were allowed to stand for 1 h for diffusion then incubated at 37°C for 24 hrs. At the end of incubation, inhibition zones were measured.Table 1
Elemental analysis of the prepared complexes.
Complex
M. Pt. (C)
Found (Calcd.)%
H
C
N
(Gly)Cd(SeCN)2
Decomp. at 184
1.32 (1.27)
12.15 (12.09)
10.78 (10.57)
(Gly)Hg(SeCN)2
>300
1.10 (1.04)
10.04 (9.89)
9.00 (8.65)
(His)Cd(SeCN)2
Decomp. > 205
2.00 (1.90)
20.44 (20.12)
14.88 (14.67)
(His)Hg(SeCN)2
Decomp. > 140
1.70 (1.60)
17.11 (16.99)
12.64 (12.38)


## 3. Results and Discussions

### 3.1. IR and NMR Studies

The13C solution NMR data of all complexes were shown in Table 3. The downfield chemical shifts were observed for the prepared complexes for (Gly)Cd(SeCN)2 at 194.9 ppm and (Gly)Hg(SeCN)2 at 189.24 with respect to the free ligand, Glycine at 173.1 ppm. These high downfield shifts resulted from the electron donation from Glycine carboxylate to metal thereby causing about 20 ppm shifts of carbonyl carbon, while this shift was not observed in the Histidine complexes because, in Histidine complexes, imidazole nitrogen and α-amine are involved in coordination to the metal center, which agree with the reported binding mode of Histidine to mercury metal ion as shown in Figure 3 [31].The C≡N infrared frequency for Hg(SeCN)2 is higher than that for Cd(SeCN)2 which means stronger C–N bond, and this lead to less electron density at the selenium atom that derives more back donation from the Hg to Se, which makes Hg–Se bond stronger. This less electron density observed also by downfield shift for the de-shielded Se bound to Hg (−109 ppm) compared with Se bound to Cd (−272 ppm) as shown by 77Se NMR (Table 4). In case of Histidine complexes of Hg(SeCN)2 selenium atom became more shielded and shifted upfield (−169.71 ppm) because of donation from Histidine to the metal center, which causes even stronger π-back donation to selenium. In Table 2, the IR data shows the highest red shift for selenocyanate frequency for Histidine complex of mercury which means the highest π-back donation from the metal to the selenocyanate rather than Glycine so greater donation to the antibonding π-orbitals of the cyanate from selenium atom indication of stronger Histidine mercury bonding than the rest of the complexes series. This is also clear from 77Se NMR data, which showed greater deshielding effect at the selenium via complexing to Histidine, which binds through two nitrogen atoms [32]. In general, good agreement of the experimental and theoretical IR starching bands observed for the prepared complexes with some blue shift of the calculated results because of the intermolecular interaction in the real IR experiment.Table 2
IR frequencies,ν(cm−1) Hg(SeCN)2 and Cd(SeCN)2 complexes theoretical  versus experimental.
Species
ν(C=O) Exp.
ν(C=O) Theo.
ν(SeCN) Exp.
ν(SeCN) Theo.
ν(NH2) Exp.
ν(NH2) Theo.
KSeCN
—
—
2070a
—
—
—
L-Gly
1606 s
—
—
—
3424
—
L-Hist
1634 s
—
—
—
3127
—
Cd(SeCN)2
—
—
2107
—
—
—
(L-Gly)Cd(SeCN)2
1611 s
1759
2107
2127
3450
3455
(L-Hist)Cd(SeCN)2
1631 s
1718
2109
2112
3460
3402
Hg(SeCN)2
—
—
2127
—
—
—
(L-Gly)Hg(SeCN)2
1611 s
1742
2130
2137
3447
3476
(L-Hist)Hg(SeCN)2
1636 s
1716
2111
2118
3422
3423
a[14].Table 3
13C NMR chemical shifts of Hg(SeCN)2 and Cd(SeCN)2 complexes in DMSO-d6.
Species
SeCN
C=O
C-1
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
His
—
174.7
136.2
135.0
117.9
55.1
29.0
Gly
—
173.1
42.5
Cd(SeCN)2
116.9
(His)Cd(SeCN)2
115.4
173.0
136.6
134.5
117.0
53.5
28.1
(Gly)Cd(SeCN)2
119.0
194.9
Hg(SeCN)2
103.3
(His)Hg(SeCN)2
109.8
170.3
135.0
132.3
116.4
53.3
27.4
(Gly)Hg(SeCN)2
116.5
189.2Table 4
77Se NMR chemical shifts of Hg(SeCN)2 and Cd(SeCN)2 complexes in  DMSO-d6.
Species
77Se (in ppm)
Cd(SeCN)2
−272.94
Hg(SeCN)2
−109.18
(His)Hg(SeCN)2
−169.71The CPMAS NMR spectral data for complexes (Gly)Cd(SeCN)2 and (His)Cd(SeCN)2 for 13C and (Gly)Hg(SeCN)2 and (His)Hg(SeCN)2 for 15N are shown in Tables 5 and 6, respectively. The solid-state 13C and 15N NMR spectra are shown in Figures 1 and 2, and the peaks are denoted by asterisk. The calculated chemical shift tensors are also compiled in Tables 5 and 6, along with the span, Ω, which describes the breadth of the chemical shift tensor and skew, κ, describing the shape of the powder pattern. From Table 5, solid-state 13C NMR of Glycine and Histidine cadmium complexes shows increase in the chemical of the Se13CN NMR shift increased by ~2 ppm for mercury complex this is because the involvement of selenium in binding to the metal center, causing deshielding at the SeCN carbon. But in case of the 15N NMR data in Table 6, Histidine and Glycine complexes show a significant downfield shift of the nitrogen atom signal of the amines group; additionally, Histidine shows downfield shift for the imidazole moiety, which improves imidazole nitrogen involvement in binding to metal.Table 5
Solid-state13C Isotropic Chemical Shifts (δiso) and Principle Shielding Tensors(σxx)a of  complexes Cd(II)-Selenocyanate complexes with Glycine and Histidine ligands.
Complex
Nucleus
δ
iso
σ
11
σ
22
σ
33
Δ
σ
η
Cd(SeCN)2
113Cd
211.9
322
283
30
291
0.73
77Se
−119.6
53
41
−452
505
0.96
13C
117.0
222
205
−76
298
0.89
(Gly)Cd(SeCN)2
13C
170.8
242
171
98
−109
0.98
13C
119.9
212
124
23
−146
0.90
(His)Cd(SeCN)2
13C
169.3
236
169
102
−101
0.99
13C
108.4
181
103
41
−101
0.86
13C
132.0
202
136
58
−111
0.90
13C
129.2
196
130
61
−102
0.96
13C
119.5
213
120
23
−142
0.97
aIsotropic shielding,σi=(σ11+σ22+σ33)/3;  Δσ=σ33-0.5 (σ11+σ22);   η=3(σ22-σ11)/2Δσ.Table 6
Solid-state15N isotropic chemical shifts (δiso) and principle shielding tensors (δxx)a of  complexes, Hg(II)-selenocyanate complexes.
Complex
Nucleus
δ
iso
δ
11
δ
22
δ
33
Δ
σ
η
His
15N
−202.55
−97.76
−181
−328.85
−189.45
0.66
15N
−331.02
—
—
—
—
—
(His)Hg(SeCN)2
15N
−156.73
−27.66
—
−272.80
−174.11
0.80
15N
−146.5
—
169.72
—
—
—
Gly
15N
−345.56
—
—
—
—
—
(Gly)Hg(SeCN)2
15N
−311.01
—
—
—
—
—
aIsotropic shielding, σi: (σ11+σ22+σ33)/3;  Δσ: σ33-0.5(σ11+σ22);   η:  3(σ22-σ11)/2Δσ.13C CPMAS spectra of (a) (Gly)Cd(SeCN)2, (b) (His)Cd(SeCN)2. The center peak is denoted by “*.”
(a)
(b)15N NMR spectra of (a) (Gly)Hg(SeCN)2 and (b) (His)Hg(SeCN)2.
(a)
(b)Figure 3
Possible binding sites for Cd2+ and Hg2+ His and Gly complexes.


### 3.2. Computation Study

Computational study shows that Glycine (C=O) and (C–O) bonds in the optimized structure (Scheme1) are shorter in Cd complex than that in Hg complex (Tables 7 and 8), which agree with experimental 13C NMR results, while no differences in (C=O) and (C–O) bonds were observed in His complexes indicating less contribution of carboxylate in binding. Se–Cd is shorter than Se–Hg because of the size proximity in the sizes of Se and Cd atoms. It is worth mentioning here that the calculated bond lengths are comparable to reported experimental bond lengths for Se–Cd obtained by single crystals (2.723 and 2.828 Å) [20, 21]. It is also observed that Hg–N and Hg–O are longer than Cd–N and Cd–O because Cd is harder than Hg, and this results in better interaction. This may cause higher stability of Cd complexes in general. Nitrogen is a less electronegative atom than oxygen, so it can donate electron more easily to the metal and form stronger bonds with metals, which results in stronger chelation through two nitrogens than chelation through nitrogen and oxygen. L-Histidine complexes of Hg and Cd have shorter bonds than Glycine complexes indicating stronger bonds in Histidine complexes, and this agrees with the higher electron donation concluded from 77Se NMR data.Table 7
Selected bond lengths (Å) for [LM(SeCN)2] for optimized structure using B3LYP/LanL2DZ; L refers to Histidine and Glycine, while M refers to Hg or Cd.
Hg(SeCN)2 + His
Cd(SeCN)2 + His
Hg(SeCN)2 + Gly
Cd(SeCN)2 + Gly
Hg-Se1
2.765
Cd-Se1
2.718
Hg-Se1
2.699
Cd-Se1
2.656
Hg-Se2
2.795
Cd-Se2
2.745
Hg-Se2
2.731
Cd-Se2
2.691
Hg-N1
2.434
Cd-N1
2.302
Hg-N1
2.576
Cd-N1
2.415
Hg-N2
2.537
Cd-N2
2.399
Hg-O1
2.656
Cd-O1
2.423
C=O
1.236
C=O
1.236
C=O
1.232
C=O
1.228
C–O
1.386
C–O
1.386
C–O
1.402
C–O
1.412Table 8
Selected torsion angle (°) for [LM(SeCN)2] for optimized structure using B3LYP/LanL2DZ; L refers to Histidine and Glycine, while M refers to Hg or Cd.
Hg(SeCN)2 + His
Cd(SeCN)2 + His
Hg(SeCN)2 + Gly
Cd(SeCN)2 + Gly
Se1-C-N4
178.79
Se1-C-N4
178.45
Se1-C-N3
178.03
Se1-C-N2
178.20
Se2-C-N5
176.36
Se2-C-N5
175.84
Se2-C-N2
177.04
Se2-C-N3
176.32
N1-Hg-N2
83.87
N1-Cd-N2
87.79
N1-Hg-O1
64.67
N1-Cd-O1
96.81
Se1-Hg-Se2
125.79
Se1-Cd-Se2
121.32
Se1-Hg-Se2
149.92
Se1-Cd-Se2
139.71
Se1-Hg-N1
108.92
Se1-Cd-N1
111.15
Se1-Hg-N1
107.50
Se1-Cd-N1
112.35
Se2-Hg-N2
99.18
Se2-Cd-N2
101.26
Se2-Hg-O1
111.58
Se2-Cd-O1
112.17
Se1-Hg-N2
118.69
Se1-Cd-N2
116.85
Se1-Hg-O1
89.99
Se1-Cd-O1
96.81
Se2-Hg-N1
112.60
Se2-Cd-N1
113.30
Se2-Hg-N1
100.81
Se2-Cd-N1
103.86Scheme 1
Optimized geometries of [LM(SeCN)2] (a), (b), (c), and (d), obtained at the B3LYP/LanL2DZ level of theory using Gaussian 09, Revision A. 1. L refers to Histidine or Glycine, while M refers to Hg or Cd.


### 3.3. Antibacterial Activity

Thein vitro antibacterial activity studies were performed with Cd(II) complexes against activity of both gram-positive as well as gram-negative bacteria. Two complexes, (His)Cd(SeCN)2 and (Gly)Cd(SeCN)2, exhibited their antibacterial activity compared to Cd(SeCN)2 except for K. pneumoniae which showed resistance to all the compounds tested, and Hg(SeCN)2 inhibition was reported previously [15], while mercury complexes with Glycine and Histidine did not show significant antibacterial activity. The activities of the complexes are summarized in Table 9.Table 9
Antibacterial activities of [LM(SeCN)2] complexes.
Microorganisms
Zone of inhibition (mm)
Hg
(
SeCN
)
2
*
Cd(SeCN)2
(His)Cd(SeCN)2
(Gly)Cd(SeCN)2
E. coli
—
25
35
22
P. aeruginosa
10
20
18
32
S. typhi
10
28
32
29
S. aureus
22
20
22
20
K. pneumoniae
22
—
—
—
*[15]


## 3.1. IR and NMR Studies

The13C solution NMR data of all complexes were shown in Table 3. The downfield chemical shifts were observed for the prepared complexes for (Gly)Cd(SeCN)2 at 194.9 ppm and (Gly)Hg(SeCN)2 at 189.24 with respect to the free ligand, Glycine at 173.1 ppm. These high downfield shifts resulted from the electron donation from Glycine carboxylate to metal thereby causing about 20 ppm shifts of carbonyl carbon, while this shift was not observed in the Histidine complexes because, in Histidine complexes, imidazole nitrogen and α-amine are involved in coordination to the metal center, which agree with the reported binding mode of Histidine to mercury metal ion as shown in Figure 3 [31].The C≡N infrared frequency for Hg(SeCN)2 is higher than that for Cd(SeCN)2 which means stronger C–N bond, and this lead to less electron density at the selenium atom that derives more back donation from the Hg to Se, which makes Hg–Se bond stronger. This less electron density observed also by downfield shift for the de-shielded Se bound to Hg (−109 ppm) compared with Se bound to Cd (−272 ppm) as shown by 77Se NMR (Table 4). In case of Histidine complexes of Hg(SeCN)2 selenium atom became more shielded and shifted upfield (−169.71 ppm) because of donation from Histidine to the metal center, which causes even stronger π-back donation to selenium. In Table 2, the IR data shows the highest red shift for selenocyanate frequency for Histidine complex of mercury which means the highest π-back donation from the metal to the selenocyanate rather than Glycine so greater donation to the antibonding π-orbitals of the cyanate from selenium atom indication of stronger Histidine mercury bonding than the rest of the complexes series. This is also clear from 77Se NMR data, which showed greater deshielding effect at the selenium via complexing to Histidine, which binds through two nitrogen atoms [32]. In general, good agreement of the experimental and theoretical IR starching bands observed for the prepared complexes with some blue shift of the calculated results because of the intermolecular interaction in the real IR experiment.Table 2
IR frequencies,ν(cm−1) Hg(SeCN)2 and Cd(SeCN)2 complexes theoretical  versus experimental.
Species
ν(C=O) Exp.
ν(C=O) Theo.
ν(SeCN) Exp.
ν(SeCN) Theo.
ν(NH2) Exp.
ν(NH2) Theo.
KSeCN
—
—
2070a
—
—
—
L-Gly
1606 s
—
—
—
3424
—
L-Hist
1634 s
—
—
—
3127
—
Cd(SeCN)2
—
—
2107
—
—
—
(L-Gly)Cd(SeCN)2
1611 s
1759
2107
2127
3450
3455
(L-Hist)Cd(SeCN)2
1631 s
1718
2109
2112
3460
3402
Hg(SeCN)2
—
—
2127
—
—
—
(L-Gly)Hg(SeCN)2
1611 s
1742
2130
2137
3447
3476
(L-Hist)Hg(SeCN)2
1636 s
1716
2111
2118
3422
3423
a[14].Table 3
13C NMR chemical shifts of Hg(SeCN)2 and Cd(SeCN)2 complexes in DMSO-d6.
Species
SeCN
C=O
C-1
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
His
—
174.7
136.2
135.0
117.9
55.1
29.0
Gly
—
173.1
42.5
Cd(SeCN)2
116.9
(His)Cd(SeCN)2
115.4
173.0
136.6
134.5
117.0
53.5
28.1
(Gly)Cd(SeCN)2
119.0
194.9
Hg(SeCN)2
103.3
(His)Hg(SeCN)2
109.8
170.3
135.0
132.3
116.4
53.3
27.4
(Gly)Hg(SeCN)2
116.5
189.2Table 4
77Se NMR chemical shifts of Hg(SeCN)2 and Cd(SeCN)2 complexes in  DMSO-d6.
Species
77Se (in ppm)
Cd(SeCN)2
−272.94
Hg(SeCN)2
−109.18
(His)Hg(SeCN)2
−169.71The CPMAS NMR spectral data for complexes (Gly)Cd(SeCN)2 and (His)Cd(SeCN)2 for 13C and (Gly)Hg(SeCN)2 and (His)Hg(SeCN)2 for 15N are shown in Tables 5 and 6, respectively. The solid-state 13C and 15N NMR spectra are shown in Figures 1 and 2, and the peaks are denoted by asterisk. The calculated chemical shift tensors are also compiled in Tables 5 and 6, along with the span, Ω, which describes the breadth of the chemical shift tensor and skew, κ, describing the shape of the powder pattern. From Table 5, solid-state 13C NMR of Glycine and Histidine cadmium complexes shows increase in the chemical of the Se13CN NMR shift increased by ~2 ppm for mercury complex this is because the involvement of selenium in binding to the metal center, causing deshielding at the SeCN carbon. But in case of the 15N NMR data in Table 6, Histidine and Glycine complexes show a significant downfield shift of the nitrogen atom signal of the amines group; additionally, Histidine shows downfield shift for the imidazole moiety, which improves imidazole nitrogen involvement in binding to metal.Table 5
Solid-state13C Isotropic Chemical Shifts (δiso) and Principle Shielding Tensors(σxx)a of  complexes Cd(II)-Selenocyanate complexes with Glycine and Histidine ligands.
Complex
Nucleus
δ
iso
σ
11
σ
22
σ
33
Δ
σ
η
Cd(SeCN)2
113Cd
211.9
322
283
30
291
0.73
77Se
−119.6
53
41
−452
505
0.96
13C
117.0
222
205
−76
298
0.89
(Gly)Cd(SeCN)2
13C
170.8
242
171
98
−109
0.98
13C
119.9
212
124
23
−146
0.90
(His)Cd(SeCN)2
13C
169.3
236
169
102
−101
0.99
13C
108.4
181
103
41
−101
0.86
13C
132.0
202
136
58
−111
0.90
13C
129.2
196
130
61
−102
0.96
13C
119.5
213
120
23
−142
0.97
aIsotropic shielding,σi=(σ11+σ22+σ33)/3;  Δσ=σ33-0.5 (σ11+σ22);   η=3(σ22-σ11)/2Δσ.Table 6
Solid-state15N isotropic chemical shifts (δiso) and principle shielding tensors (δxx)a of  complexes, Hg(II)-selenocyanate complexes.
Complex
Nucleus
δ
iso
δ
11
δ
22
δ
33
Δ
σ
η
His
15N
−202.55
−97.76
−181
−328.85
−189.45
0.66
15N
−331.02
—
—
—
—
—
(His)Hg(SeCN)2
15N
−156.73
−27.66
—
−272.80
−174.11
0.80
15N
−146.5
—
169.72
—
—
—
Gly
15N
−345.56
—
—
—
—
—
(Gly)Hg(SeCN)2
15N
−311.01
—
—
—
—
—
aIsotropic shielding, σi: (σ11+σ22+σ33)/3;  Δσ: σ33-0.5(σ11+σ22);   η:  3(σ22-σ11)/2Δσ.13C CPMAS spectra of (a) (Gly)Cd(SeCN)2, (b) (His)Cd(SeCN)2. The center peak is denoted by “*.”
(a)
(b)15N NMR spectra of (a) (Gly)Hg(SeCN)2 and (b) (His)Hg(SeCN)2.
(a)
(b)Figure 3
Possible binding sites for Cd2+ and Hg2+ His and Gly complexes.


## 3.2. Computation Study

Computational study shows that Glycine (C=O) and (C–O) bonds in the optimized structure (Scheme1) are shorter in Cd complex than that in Hg complex (Tables 7 and 8), which agree with experimental 13C NMR results, while no differences in (C=O) and (C–O) bonds were observed in His complexes indicating less contribution of carboxylate in binding. Se–Cd is shorter than Se–Hg because of the size proximity in the sizes of Se and Cd atoms. It is worth mentioning here that the calculated bond lengths are comparable to reported experimental bond lengths for Se–Cd obtained by single crystals (2.723 and 2.828 Å) [20, 21]. It is also observed that Hg–N and Hg–O are longer than Cd–N and Cd–O because Cd is harder than Hg, and this results in better interaction. This may cause higher stability of Cd complexes in general. Nitrogen is a less electronegative atom than oxygen, so it can donate electron more easily to the metal and form stronger bonds with metals, which results in stronger chelation through two nitrogens than chelation through nitrogen and oxygen. L-Histidine complexes of Hg and Cd have shorter bonds than Glycine complexes indicating stronger bonds in Histidine complexes, and this agrees with the higher electron donation concluded from 77Se NMR data.Table 7
Selected bond lengths (Å) for [LM(SeCN)2] for optimized structure using B3LYP/LanL2DZ; L refers to Histidine and Glycine, while M refers to Hg or Cd.
Hg(SeCN)2 + His
Cd(SeCN)2 + His
Hg(SeCN)2 + Gly
Cd(SeCN)2 + Gly
Hg-Se1
2.765
Cd-Se1
2.718
Hg-Se1
2.699
Cd-Se1
2.656
Hg-Se2
2.795
Cd-Se2
2.745
Hg-Se2
2.731
Cd-Se2
2.691
Hg-N1
2.434
Cd-N1
2.302
Hg-N1
2.576
Cd-N1
2.415
Hg-N2
2.537
Cd-N2
2.399
Hg-O1
2.656
Cd-O1
2.423
C=O
1.236
C=O
1.236
C=O
1.232
C=O
1.228
C–O
1.386
C–O
1.386
C–O
1.402
C–O
1.412Table 8
Selected torsion angle (°) for [LM(SeCN)2] for optimized structure using B3LYP/LanL2DZ; L refers to Histidine and Glycine, while M refers to Hg or Cd.
Hg(SeCN)2 + His
Cd(SeCN)2 + His
Hg(SeCN)2 + Gly
Cd(SeCN)2 + Gly
Se1-C-N4
178.79
Se1-C-N4
178.45
Se1-C-N3
178.03
Se1-C-N2
178.20
Se2-C-N5
176.36
Se2-C-N5
175.84
Se2-C-N2
177.04
Se2-C-N3
176.32
N1-Hg-N2
83.87
N1-Cd-N2
87.79
N1-Hg-O1
64.67
N1-Cd-O1
96.81
Se1-Hg-Se2
125.79
Se1-Cd-Se2
121.32
Se1-Hg-Se2
149.92
Se1-Cd-Se2
139.71
Se1-Hg-N1
108.92
Se1-Cd-N1
111.15
Se1-Hg-N1
107.50
Se1-Cd-N1
112.35
Se2-Hg-N2
99.18
Se2-Cd-N2
101.26
Se2-Hg-O1
111.58
Se2-Cd-O1
112.17
Se1-Hg-N2
118.69
Se1-Cd-N2
116.85
Se1-Hg-O1
89.99
Se1-Cd-O1
96.81
Se2-Hg-N1
112.60
Se2-Cd-N1
113.30
Se2-Hg-N1
100.81
Se2-Cd-N1
103.86Scheme 1
Optimized geometries of [LM(SeCN)2] (a), (b), (c), and (d), obtained at the B3LYP/LanL2DZ level of theory using Gaussian 09, Revision A. 1. L refers to Histidine or Glycine, while M refers to Hg or Cd.


## 3.3. Antibacterial Activity

Thein vitro antibacterial activity studies were performed with Cd(II) complexes against activity of both gram-positive as well as gram-negative bacteria. Two complexes, (His)Cd(SeCN)2 and (Gly)Cd(SeCN)2, exhibited their antibacterial activity compared to Cd(SeCN)2 except for K. pneumoniae which showed resistance to all the compounds tested, and Hg(SeCN)2 inhibition was reported previously [15], while mercury complexes with Glycine and Histidine did not show significant antibacterial activity. The activities of the complexes are summarized in Table 9.Table 9
Antibacterial activities of [LM(SeCN)2] complexes.
Microorganisms
Zone of inhibition (mm)
Hg
(
SeCN
)
2
*
Cd(SeCN)2
(His)Cd(SeCN)2
(Gly)Cd(SeCN)2
E. coli
—
25
35
22
P. aeruginosa
10
20
18
32
S. typhi
10
28
32
29
S. aureus
22
20
22
20
K. pneumoniae
22
—
—
—
*[15]


## 4. Conclusions

We have described the synthesis of Cd(II) and Hg(II) complexes of the type, [(L)M(SeCN)2] (where L=Histidine or Glycine and M=Cd2+ or Hg2+), for use as a potential antibacterial agents. Characterization of these compounds by EA, IR solution, and solid NMR of various nucleuses reveals that the metal complexes with Histidine are more strongly coordinated than that of the corresponding Glycine containing metal complexes. The Cd(II) complexes have shown good zone inhibition towards different microorganisms, and thier further biological evaluation is under process, while no significant antibacterial activity was observed for the mercury complexes.



---

*Source: 476874-2013-02-28.xml*