# Health Status and the Demand for Healthcare among the Elderly in the Rural Quoc-Oai District of Hanoi in Vietnam

Authors: Kyung-Sook Bang; Sunghee H. Tak; Juhwan Oh; Jinseon Yi; Soo-Young Yu; Truong Quang Trung
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

Background. Vietnam is experiencing an unprecedented demographic transition. Its proportion of elderly people is growing rapidly.Objective. This study explored the health status and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of rural elderly Vietnamese and assessed their needs for healthcare services.Design. This study used a survey with stratified proportion sampling and quota assignment. In 2016, data was collected from 713 people in the rural Quoc-Oai district of Hanoi aged 60 or older.Results. The mean age of the respondents was 70.9. Both self-rated health status and functional status decreased with age. Women reported more functional limitations than men. Musculoskeletal disorders were the most frequently reported chronic diseases, followed by hypertension, gastrointestinal diseases, and cardiovascular diseases. Age, self-rated health status, BMIs, and the number of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) were found to be significant determinants of HRQoL, after controlling for socioeconomic effects. More than half the respondents requested more healthcare information, particularly on disease management.Conclusions. Vietnam’s healthcare system is being challenged to make health services easily accessible and meet the growing needs for chronic illness management, risk reduction, promoting healthy lifestyles, and improving the aging population’s quality of life.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The world’s population is aging, and this trend is also evident in Vietnam, where the proportion of people over 60 years of age has increased rapidly in recent decades, from 6.7% in 1979 to 10% in 2013. Further influencing this trend is confirmation that life expectancy at birth increased from 66 years in 1990 to 76 years by 2012 [1]. Meanwhile, epidemiological evidence has shown that even in developing countries the most prevalent diseases are no longer communicable diseases, but rather noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). The World Health Organization’s 2014 NCD Country Profile for Vietnam estimated that NCDs account for 73% of all deaths [2]. Mean systolic blood pressure readings have been increasing since 1980, and mean total cholesterol levels have also been increasing since 1996. Stroke and ischemic heart disease were the leading causes of death in 2012 [2].These data highlight elderly people’s need to adopt lifestyle modifications for their health. However, lifestyle changes are not made easily. Systematic education, motivation, and continuous monitoring by health professionals might be very helpful for encouraging lifestyle changes. In addition, functional status and health status are both highly related to the quality of life, and especially so for the elderly [3]. In one study, almost ten percent of the respondents reported a need for some help conducting activities of daily living (ADL), while over two-thirds of the elderly in rural Vietnam indicated that they needed instrumental or intellectual ADL support [4].With rapid industrialization, young people moved to urban areas for employment, and, over time, the family structure in rural areas has changed significantly. In 1998, the proportion of families comprised only of elderly spouses was 12.7%, and the proportion of elderly people aged 60 and over living alone was 4.93%. However, these proportions increased to 21.47% and 6.14%, respectively, in 2008 [5]. The combined percentage of elderly people who live on their own as couples and those who live alone continues to increase over time. In 2004 and 2005, L. Nguyen and T. H. Nguyen (2010) analyzed the secondary data of 979 elderly participants from five provinces in Vietnam (Quang Nam, Ho chi minh City, Thanh Hoa, Son La, and Kon Tum). Among 938 responders who chose home-based care when suffering from illness, 74.2% (696) of participants received care from their children, 22% (206) provided self-care, and 2.1% (20) received care from friends or others. Only 0.5% (5) of the participants hired a housemaid to take care for them. These numbers may increase or differ from the current situation, because of economic development, industrialization, and urbanization within Vietnam [6].While elderly people in urban areas can benefit directly from facilities for the elderly [7], more than 70% of Vietnamese seniors live in rural areas, where limited financial resources are available [8]. The elderly who lived in rural areas were earlier cared for by their families; however, they can no longer rely solely on their families, and other sources of support should be proposed. The model of caring for elderly people within the community differed across different geographical regions within Vietnam [9]. According to one report, every elderly person suffers 2.69 diseases on average, and most of the elderly living in rural areas have poorer health status than their counterparts in urban areas [10]. It is evident that better planning is required to provide the aging populations in rural communities with the healthcare services they need.To date, studies on the health status of elderly populations in Vietnam’s rural areas have been very limited. Conducting these studies requires that the targeted population’s functional status (ADL) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) be evaluated and the factors that influence these measures be identified. Furthermore, their needs for healthcare services should be assessed, and strategies and policies for improving their health should be developed.This study of elderly people in Vietnam’s rural areas has two main objectives. The first is to explore this population’s health status and HRQoL and to confirm the significant determinants. The second objective is to assess their needs for healthcare services.


## 2. Methods

### 2.1. Study Setting

This study was conducted in 2016 as part of a joint cohort study for a Health System Strengthening project led by collaborators from two universities in Vietnam and one in Korea. The project team selected the Quoc-Oai district of Hanoi—located 30 km from Western Hanoi—as the research area and conducted a community-based survey to generate baseline data. The area is divided into two strata, namely, lowland and mountainous areas. All clusters and corresponding population numbers were listed using a probability-proportional-to-size (PPS) technique [11] that is a widely used and recommended method for obtaining a representative national sample. A stratified multistage cluster sampling technique was used to identify households for this study. Based on a three-stage cluster sampling strategy, 2,400 households were randomly selected from 30 clusters (villages), which in turn had been randomly selected from 2 strata: lowlands and mountains. One person aged between 15 and 60 years was randomly selected from each household, and if there was more than one person over 60 living in a household, another person aged over 60 years was randomly sampled.


### 2.2. Sampling and Sample Size

The sample size selected for this survey was based on the formula suggested by the WHO [12], and a proportion of each population and the national figures estimated by Ho chi minh Medical University/WHO research. Based on this calculation, a sample size of approximately 1,100 people was required. In most prevalence surveys, a design effect of 1.5~2 is reasonable [13], so in this study the design effect of 2 was applied. Based on an expected nonresponse rate of about 10%, the final sample size was estimated to be 2,400 households.The number of households that responded to the survey was 2,399, and the response rate was 99.9%. Individual interviewees were chosen using the Kish Method [14], and, in each selected household, the data collector interviewed the head of the household using the household questionnaire, and two household members using the questionnaire designed for individuals (one individual between 15 and 59 years of age, and one individual 60 years of age or older). The total number of individuals who responded to the survey was 3,070, and 824 individuals who were 60 years of age or older were selected to be study participants. Responses with incomplete data were removed, and the remaining 713 respondents were included in the final analysis. The sampling procedure is illustrated in Figure 1.Figure 1
Sampling and data collection process.


### 2.3. Data Collection

Face-to-face interviews were conducted with participants using structured questionnaires. The questionnaires were divided into sections for households and individuals. After the survey had been completed, the data collected from the two surveys were consolidated. Double data-entry using Epidata 3.1 was performed, to evaluate inconsistent values for any variables. To ensure the study’s accuracy, any responses with missing or irrelevant values were deleted.


### 2.4. Variable Measurements and Instruments

We used age, gender, ethnicity, location, marital status, educational level, religion, working status, and household size as demographic variables. Self-rated health status was measured using a 5-point Likert scale, which was reclassified into three categories: good, normal, and bad. BMIs were calculated using self-reported heights and weights and categorized on the basis of Asian-specific BMI cut-offs [15]. Chronic disease prevalence was measured with a multiple-choice questionnaire that asked the following question: “In the past 12 months, have you been diagnosed by a doctor with one or more of the following chronic diseases?”Social capital encompasses different characteristics, such as social networks, social participation, social support, social cohesion, attitudes, and trust [16]. For this study, social capital was measured using an instrument developed in 2012 [17]. It consists of two domains: the first evaluates whether there is a relationship based on general trust or support between neighbors in everyday life, and the second asks whether there is a relationship based on trust in emergency situations. The first domain asks four questions with regard to general situations: they relate to a “willingness to help each other,” the “perceived sense of living in a close-knit village,” the “perceived level of a neighbor’s trust,” and “how much neighbors can work together.” Respondents chose from one of five levels to indicate their level of agreement with these statements. The second domain consisted of four questions related to individuals in urgent need of help: they included “the possibility of receiving help from one’s neighbor,” “willingness to help,” “the number of people who give sincere advice,” and “the number of people from whom you can borrow money.” The possible responses again consisted of four levels: four was the highest, and one was the lowest. Each score for the second domain was recalculated with a weighted value that changed it to its original score by 1.25.The participants’ functioning assessment was measured using a modified version of a generic assessment instrument for health and disability developed as part of a WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) [18]. This instrument consists of ten items asking questions about five domains: mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities, participation, and cognition. The higher one’s score on the functioning assessment, the more limited the individual’s physical activity level.The Vietnamese version of the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire [19] was used to measure the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of the elderly in rural areas. This questionnaire is comprised five dimensions, namely, mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Responses permitted for each dimension had three levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. Even though the Vietnamese version of EQ-5D-3L was used, because it lacks the preference value set developed for Vietnam, the time trade-off valuation set from South Korea [15] was used in this study. The EQ-5D-3L index ranged from −0.171 to 1, and higher values indicated a better health-related quality of life.Participants’ needs for health information and home healthcare services were confirmed during interviews conducted using open-ended questions. Participants who responded by saying that they needed information with regard to their health status described what types of health information they wanted to receive. If they had any needs for home healthcare services—including rehabilitation—participants were asked to describe the health problems for which would they like to receive services. Interviewers summarized participants’ answers and coded the responses using short words.


### 2.5. Data Analysis

SPSS Statistics 23 software was used for the statistical analysis. Descriptive statistical analyses were used to describe the socioeconomic characteristics, health status, prevalence of NCDs, social capital, functioning assessment, and health-related quality of life. Student’st-test and a one-way ANOVA were used to compare the differences between these characteristics in a functioning assessment and the HRQoL. For the post hoc test, Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) was applied. Multiple regression analysis was performed to detect the effects of factors on the HRQoL index. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.The responses to open-ended questions for healthcare needs were analyzed using NVivo 11 software. The responses most frequently in all the subjective texts were selected and a weighted percentage was calculated, after which the authors created domains and categorized the texts into these domains.


### 2.6. Ethical Considerations

The Institutional Review Board of the Hanoi School of Public Health approved this study in 2016. After they had been informed of the purpose of the study and their rights, informed consent was obtained from all participants. They were told that they could refuse to participate, or choose to withdraw from an interview, at any time. Confidentiality was assured, by coding participants’ responses.


## 2.1. Study Setting

This study was conducted in 2016 as part of a joint cohort study for a Health System Strengthening project led by collaborators from two universities in Vietnam and one in Korea. The project team selected the Quoc-Oai district of Hanoi—located 30 km from Western Hanoi—as the research area and conducted a community-based survey to generate baseline data. The area is divided into two strata, namely, lowland and mountainous areas. All clusters and corresponding population numbers were listed using a probability-proportional-to-size (PPS) technique [11] that is a widely used and recommended method for obtaining a representative national sample. A stratified multistage cluster sampling technique was used to identify households for this study. Based on a three-stage cluster sampling strategy, 2,400 households were randomly selected from 30 clusters (villages), which in turn had been randomly selected from 2 strata: lowlands and mountains. One person aged between 15 and 60 years was randomly selected from each household, and if there was more than one person over 60 living in a household, another person aged over 60 years was randomly sampled.


## 2.2. Sampling and Sample Size

The sample size selected for this survey was based on the formula suggested by the WHO [12], and a proportion of each population and the national figures estimated by Ho chi minh Medical University/WHO research. Based on this calculation, a sample size of approximately 1,100 people was required. In most prevalence surveys, a design effect of 1.5~2 is reasonable [13], so in this study the design effect of 2 was applied. Based on an expected nonresponse rate of about 10%, the final sample size was estimated to be 2,400 households.The number of households that responded to the survey was 2,399, and the response rate was 99.9%. Individual interviewees were chosen using the Kish Method [14], and, in each selected household, the data collector interviewed the head of the household using the household questionnaire, and two household members using the questionnaire designed for individuals (one individual between 15 and 59 years of age, and one individual 60 years of age or older). The total number of individuals who responded to the survey was 3,070, and 824 individuals who were 60 years of age or older were selected to be study participants. Responses with incomplete data were removed, and the remaining 713 respondents were included in the final analysis. The sampling procedure is illustrated in Figure 1.Figure 1
Sampling and data collection process.


## 2.3. Data Collection

Face-to-face interviews were conducted with participants using structured questionnaires. The questionnaires were divided into sections for households and individuals. After the survey had been completed, the data collected from the two surveys were consolidated. Double data-entry using Epidata 3.1 was performed, to evaluate inconsistent values for any variables. To ensure the study’s accuracy, any responses with missing or irrelevant values were deleted.


## 2.4. Variable Measurements and Instruments

We used age, gender, ethnicity, location, marital status, educational level, religion, working status, and household size as demographic variables. Self-rated health status was measured using a 5-point Likert scale, which was reclassified into three categories: good, normal, and bad. BMIs were calculated using self-reported heights and weights and categorized on the basis of Asian-specific BMI cut-offs [15]. Chronic disease prevalence was measured with a multiple-choice questionnaire that asked the following question: “In the past 12 months, have you been diagnosed by a doctor with one or more of the following chronic diseases?”Social capital encompasses different characteristics, such as social networks, social participation, social support, social cohesion, attitudes, and trust [16]. For this study, social capital was measured using an instrument developed in 2012 [17]. It consists of two domains: the first evaluates whether there is a relationship based on general trust or support between neighbors in everyday life, and the second asks whether there is a relationship based on trust in emergency situations. The first domain asks four questions with regard to general situations: they relate to a “willingness to help each other,” the “perceived sense of living in a close-knit village,” the “perceived level of a neighbor’s trust,” and “how much neighbors can work together.” Respondents chose from one of five levels to indicate their level of agreement with these statements. The second domain consisted of four questions related to individuals in urgent need of help: they included “the possibility of receiving help from one’s neighbor,” “willingness to help,” “the number of people who give sincere advice,” and “the number of people from whom you can borrow money.” The possible responses again consisted of four levels: four was the highest, and one was the lowest. Each score for the second domain was recalculated with a weighted value that changed it to its original score by 1.25.The participants’ functioning assessment was measured using a modified version of a generic assessment instrument for health and disability developed as part of a WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) [18]. This instrument consists of ten items asking questions about five domains: mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities, participation, and cognition. The higher one’s score on the functioning assessment, the more limited the individual’s physical activity level.The Vietnamese version of the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire [19] was used to measure the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of the elderly in rural areas. This questionnaire is comprised five dimensions, namely, mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Responses permitted for each dimension had three levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. Even though the Vietnamese version of EQ-5D-3L was used, because it lacks the preference value set developed for Vietnam, the time trade-off valuation set from South Korea [15] was used in this study. The EQ-5D-3L index ranged from −0.171 to 1, and higher values indicated a better health-related quality of life.Participants’ needs for health information and home healthcare services were confirmed during interviews conducted using open-ended questions. Participants who responded by saying that they needed information with regard to their health status described what types of health information they wanted to receive. If they had any needs for home healthcare services—including rehabilitation—participants were asked to describe the health problems for which would they like to receive services. Interviewers summarized participants’ answers and coded the responses using short words.


## 2.5. Data Analysis

SPSS Statistics 23 software was used for the statistical analysis. Descriptive statistical analyses were used to describe the socioeconomic characteristics, health status, prevalence of NCDs, social capital, functioning assessment, and health-related quality of life. Student’st-test and a one-way ANOVA were used to compare the differences between these characteristics in a functioning assessment and the HRQoL. For the post hoc test, Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) was applied. Multiple regression analysis was performed to detect the effects of factors on the HRQoL index. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.The responses to open-ended questions for healthcare needs were analyzed using NVivo 11 software. The responses most frequently in all the subjective texts were selected and a weighted percentage was calculated, after which the authors created domains and categorized the texts into these domains.


## 2.6. Ethical Considerations

The Institutional Review Board of the Hanoi School of Public Health approved this study in 2016. After they had been informed of the purpose of the study and their rights, informed consent was obtained from all participants. They were told that they could refuse to participate, or choose to withdraw from an interview, at any time. Confidentiality was assured, by coding participants’ responses.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Demographic Characteristics

An overview of the distribution of study participants is provided in Table1. The average age of study participants was 70.9, and the majority of them were between 60 and 69 years of age (52.9%). Of the 713 participants, 58.6% were women. Participants’ ethnicity was primarily Kinh (81.3%), which is the largest ethnic group in Vietnam [20], and most of the participants lived in plain areas (77.8%). More than half the participants were married or reunited (58.5%), and the next-largest group was widowed (37.2%). In terms of their education levels, more than one-third had not completed primary school (34.6%), and 28.5% and 25.5%, respectively, had completed primary school and secondary school. Most participants had no religion (98.2%); those who were working among the participants (76.2%) were three times more than those who did not work (23.8%). The proportion of people living in the middle to the poorest households was higher than those in the richer or richest wealth quintiles. The percentage of those with health insurance was 72.5%.Table 1
Demographic characteristics of the elderly (N=713).
Variables
N
%
Age
(Mean ± SD)
(70.9±8.81)
60 s
377
52.9
70 s
194
27.2
Over 80
142
19.9
Gender
Male
295
41.4
Female
418
58.6
Ethnicity
Kinh
580
81.3
Non-Kinh
133
18.7
Location
Plain
555
77.8
Mountain
158
22.2
Marital status
Married/reunion
417
58.5
Single/divorced/separated
31
4.3
Widowed
265
37.2
Education
Under primary
247
34.6
Primary
203
28.5
Secondary
182
25.5
High school and higher
81
11.4
Religion
Yes
13
1.8
No
700
98.2
Working status
Unemployed & retired
170
23.8
Still working
543
76.2
Household size
(Mean± SD)
(4.64±2.08)
1-2 people
152
21.3
3-4 people
148
20.8
5-6 people
290
40.7
Over 7 people
123
17.3
Wealth quintile
Richest
134
18.8
Richer
131
18.4
Middle
157
22.0
Poorer
152
21.3
Poorest
139
19.5
Health insurance
Yes
517
72.5
No
196
27.5


### 3.2. Health Status and Chronic Disease Prevalence

Self-rated health status, body mass indexes (BMIs), and the prevalence of a chronic disease diagnosis by a doctor within 12 months are summarized in Table2. The mean score of the self-rated health status was 58.4 (it ranged from 2 to 100) and tended to decrease with aging. Participants’ average BMI scores were 19.9. Most of the participants (66.9%) were categorized within the “normal range” according to current WHO BMI cut-off points [21], but 16.3% of participants were mildly underweight (17.0–18.49 kg/m2), 5.0% were moderately underweight (16.0–16.9 kg/m2), and 7.9% of participants were severely underweight (<16 kg/m2). The total mean score for social capital in this study was 3.52 (0.487) on a 5-point scale. The average score for the first domain (trust in daily life), which was asking about one’s generalized trust in everyday life, was 4.17 (0.490). The other domain, which asked questions concerning how one felt about neighbors’ attitudes toward helping them when they were in an emergency situation, scored 3.00 (0.628). There are no statistically significant relationships between social capital and other variables such as age, gender, and wealth quintile. Musculoskeletal disorders were the most frequently reported chronic disease among all age groups (50.8%), followed by hypertension (31.6%), gastrointestinal diseases (17.3%), and cardiovascular diseases (7.9%). Very few cases of cancer or diabetes were reported.Table 2
Health status and chronic disease prevalence of sample (N=713).
Variables
60 s
70 s
Over 80
Total
n
%
n
%
n
%
n
%
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Self-rated health status
Good
89
23.6
20
10.3
11
7.7
120
16.8
Normal
212
56.2
115
59.3
70
49.3
398
55.7
Bad
76
20.2
59
30.4
61
43.0
196
27.5
BMI
20.6
2.57
19.4
2.63
18.9
2.78
19.9
2.72
Severely underweight
17
4.5
13
6.7
26
18.3
56
7.9
Moderately underweight
11
2.9
19
9.8
6
4.2
36
5.0
Mildly underweight
46
12.2
40
20.6
30
21.1
116
16.3
Normal
282
74.8
118
60.8
77
54.2
477
66.9
Overweight
21
5.6
4
2.1
3
2.1
28
3.9
Recent smoker∗ (n=192)
Yes
71
53.0
13
34.2
4
20.0
88
45.8
Drinks in a month† (n=198)
Yes
111
79.3
22
64.7
12
50.0
145
73.2
Social capital
Trust in daily life
4.17
0.497
4.17
0.465
4.19
0.507
4.17
0.490
Trust in urgent need
3.04
0.631
2.98
0.605
2.94
0.651
3.00
0.628
Total
3.54
0.496
3.51
0.478
3.49
0.473
3.52
0.487
Diagnosed chronic disease
Hypertension
102
27.1
69
35.6
54
38.0
225
31.6
Diabetes
14
3.7
7
3.6
5
3.5
26
3.6
Cancer
1
0.3
2
1.0
1
0.7
4
0.6
Neuropsychiatric diseases
16
4.2
5
2.6
6
4.2
27
3.8
Cardiovascular diseases
32
8.5
14
7.2
10
7.0
56
7.9
Respiratory diseases
20
5.3
11
5.7
14
9.9
45
6.3
Asthma/COPD
19
5.0
10
5.2
9
6.3
38
5.3
Liver-related diseases
23
6.1
5
2.6
1
0.7
29
4.1
Kidney-related diseases
29
7.7
10
5.2
5
3.5
44
6.2
Gastrointestinal diseases
82
21.8
28
14.4
13
9.2
123
17.3
Musculoskeletal diseases
180
47.7
103
53.1
79
55.6
362
50.8
Movement impaired
11
2.9
3
1.5
4
2.8
18
2.5
Others
46
12.2
31
16.0
19
13.4
96
13.5
∗The person who smokes at the present. †The person who has used alcohol beverages in the last month.


### 3.3. Functional Status

The distribution of participants on the basis of the functional status of different groups is presented in Table3. Functioning assessment scores were significantly different between gender and age groups, and the number of NCDs was significantly associated with functional status. Participants with more than three NCDs scored lowest in terms of their functioning status.Table 3
Functioning assessment according to general characteristics.
Variables
Functional limitation
p
Post hoc
‡
Mean
SD
Age groups
60 sa
1.609
0.811
0.000
a < b < c
70 sb
2.012
0.940
Over 80c
2.548
1.089
Gender
Male
1.718
0.887
0.000
Female
2.038
1.015
Ethnicity
Kinh
1.936
0.981
0.086
Non-Kinh
1.775
0.947
Location
Plain
1.940
0.987
0.080
Mountain
1.786
0.932
Marital status
Married/reuniona
1.766
0.942
0.000
a < c
Single/divorced/separatedb
1.906
0.904
Widowedc
2.126
1.001
Education
Under primarya
2.202
1.101
0.000
a > b, c, d
Primaryb
1.850
0.909
Secondaryc
1.667
0.817
High school and higherd
1.681
0.838
Religion
Yes
1.730
0.627
0.514
No
1.909
0.982
Working status
Unemployed & retired
2.061
1.063
0.017
Still working
1.857
0.944
Household size
1-2 people
1.875
0.929
0.766
3-4 people
1.848
0.946
5-6 people
1.942
0.979
Over 7 people
1.930
1.067
Wealth quintile
Richest
1.800
0.880
0.083
Richer
1.874
0.910
Middle
1.840
0.959
Poorer
2.096
1.073
Poorest
1.905
1.018
Health insurance
Yes
1.940
0.997
0.134
No
1.817
0.917
Recent smoker∗
Yes
1.572
0.786
0.055
No
1.828
1.012
Drinks in a month†
Yes
1.574
0.759
0.000
No
2.142
1.184
Self-rated health status
Gooda
1.310
0.592
0.000
a
<
b
<
c
Normalb
1.739
0.806
Badc
2.608
1.086
BMI
Severely underweighta
2.591
1.214
0.000
b, c, d, e < a  d < c
Moderately underweightb
2.047
0.921
Mildly underweightc
2.004
0.971
Normal ranged
1.769
0.924
Overweighte
1.814
0.851
Number of NCDs
0a
1.505
0.625
0.000
a
<
b, c<d
1b
1.894
0.846
2c
2.016
0.913
3 and overd
2.233
0.964
n
∗
=
192, n†=198; LSD‡.


### 3.4. Health-Related Quality of Life

The mean indices of the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as measured by EQ-5D-3L are presented in Table4. The HRQoL decreased significantly with age. Men and Non-Kinh had higher indices than women and Kinh. Married or reunited people had higher HRQoLs than those who were widowed. The group with less than a primary school education had lower indices than other groups. HRQoL indices increased with a higher self-rated health status. Participants within a normal BMI range had higher indices than those who were underweight, and particularly those who were severely underweight had significantly lower indices than those who were moderately underweight, mildly underweight, and within the normal weight range group. A greater number of noncommunicable diseases were associated with lower HRQoL indices.Table 4
Health-related quality of life according to socioeconomics and health status.
Variables
Health-related quality of life
p
Post hoc
‡
Mean
SD
Age groups
60 sa
0.883
0.140
0.000
a
>
b
>
c
70 sb
0.838
0.148
Over 80c
0.759
0.239
Gender
Male
0.872
0.140
0.001
Female
0.828
0.190
Ethnicity
Kinh
0.840
0.172
0.048
Non-Kinh
0.873
0.172
Location
Plain
0.840
0.171
0.059
Mountain
0.869
0.175
Marital status
Married/reuniona
0.862
0.160
0.013
a
>
c
Single/divorced/separatedb
0.833
0.214
Widowedc
0.823
0.184
Education
Under primary
0.797
0.216
0.000
a
<
b, c, d
Primary
0.858
0.858
Secondary
0.886
0.124
High school and higher
0.879
0.123
Religion
Yes
0.847
0.110
0.980
No
0.846
0.173
Working status
Unemployed & retired
0.826
0.196
0.076
Still working
0.853
0.164
Household size
1-2 people
0.860
0.138
0.145
3-4 people
0.865
0.117
5-6 people
0.839
0.192
Over 7 people
0.824
0.211
Wealth quintile
Richest
0.860
0.142
0.358
Richer
0.845
0.176
Middle
0.862
0.163
Poorer
0.827
0.160
Poorest
0.837
0.215
Health insurance
Yes
0.842
0.179
0.288
No
0.857
0.155
Recent smoker∗
Yes
0.880
0.141
0.416
No
0.863
0.137
Drinks in a month†
Yes
0.889
0.119
0.593
No
0.877
0.175
Self-rated health status
Gooda
0.932
0.048
0.000
a
>
b
>
c
Normalb
0.878
0.117
Badc
0.730
0.244
BMI
Severely underweighta
0.739
0.234
0.000
a
<
b, c<d
Moderately underweightb
0.789
0.217
Mildly underweightc
0.825
0.180
Normal ranged
0.867
0.154
Overweighte
0.872
0.123
Number of NCDs
0a
0.914
0.072
0.000
a
>
b, c>d
1b
0.854
0.167
2c
0.832
0.177
3 overd
0.772
0.221
n
∗
=
192, n†=198; LSD‡.Multiple regression analyses were performed to identify the determining factors of elderly participants’ HRQoL (Table5). Model 1 used socioeconomic variables as independents, and Model 2 included additional variables to examine the effects of health-related factors after controlling socioeconomic variables. As shown in Table 5, the factors of age, self-rated health status, BMI, and number of NCDs were significant determinants of elderly participants’ HRQoL.Table 5
Multiple regression coefficients for significant factors of HRQoL.
Variables†
Model 1
Model 2
β
∗
S
E
p
β
S
E
p
Constant
0.886
0.040
1.006
0.047
Age group
-
0.051
0.009
0.000
-
0.032
0.008
0.000
Gender
-
0.024
0.014
0.096
-
0.016
0.013
0.226
Ethnicity
0.037
0.016
0.017
0.019
0.015
0.203
Marital status
0.004
0.008
0.608
0.002
0.007
0.833
Education
0.015
0.007
0.036
0.010
0.007
0.142
Self-rated health
-
0.076
0.010
0.000
BMI
0.018
0.006
0.005
Number of NCDs
-
0.022
0.006
0.000
R
2
0.093
0.233
∗Unstandardized coefficients; †reference category: age 60–69, male, non-Kinh, married/reunion, under primary school, good self-rated health, severely underweight, and having no NCDs.


### 3.5. Healthcare Needs

#### 3.5.1. Needed Healthcare Related Information

The number of respondents who expressed a need for health-related information was 387 (54.3%). These needs were categorized into seven areas: disease management, diet, pain management, exercise, general health, disease prevention, the health system, and others (Figure2). The information requested most often pertained to disease management (27.53%). Information was also requested for chronic diseases such as hypertension, arthritis, musculoskeletal diseases, diabetes, stomach, and rheumatoid diseases. Older adults were most interested in degenerative diseases than other acute diseases. In particular, the category of pain management accounted for 9.3% of the requests. The respondents expressed a need for healthy lifestyle–related information on diet (13.67%) and exercise (8.51%). General health information (6.73%) and that for disease prevention (3.5%) were also desired by the aged. Lastly, requests for practical information to help them assess a health facility’s quality accounted for 1.12% of the requested information.Figure 2
Needs on health-related information.


#### 3.5.2. Needed Home Healthcare Services

The number of participants who needed home healthcare services including rehabilitation was 154 (21.6%). The health problems for which respondents want home healthcare services or rehabilitation were categorized and summarized in Figure3. The majority of needs related to caring for their own diseases (62.78%), and the rest to promoting their own health and well-being (11.62%), such as learning how to maintain a healthier life, and clarifying what appropriate care is for the elderly. The most frequently requested home healthcare service pertained to musculoskeletal diseases (40.1%), and included requests for walking-aids, help recovering motor function, and relief from muscle-aches. Other needs for home healthcare services related to caring for those with cardiovascular disease (11.1%), and sensory/dermatological problems (7.6%).Figure 3
Needs on home health care services.


## 3.1. Demographic Characteristics

An overview of the distribution of study participants is provided in Table1. The average age of study participants was 70.9, and the majority of them were between 60 and 69 years of age (52.9%). Of the 713 participants, 58.6% were women. Participants’ ethnicity was primarily Kinh (81.3%), which is the largest ethnic group in Vietnam [20], and most of the participants lived in plain areas (77.8%). More than half the participants were married or reunited (58.5%), and the next-largest group was widowed (37.2%). In terms of their education levels, more than one-third had not completed primary school (34.6%), and 28.5% and 25.5%, respectively, had completed primary school and secondary school. Most participants had no religion (98.2%); those who were working among the participants (76.2%) were three times more than those who did not work (23.8%). The proportion of people living in the middle to the poorest households was higher than those in the richer or richest wealth quintiles. The percentage of those with health insurance was 72.5%.Table 1
Demographic characteristics of the elderly (N=713).
Variables
N
%
Age
(Mean ± SD)
(70.9±8.81)
60 s
377
52.9
70 s
194
27.2
Over 80
142
19.9
Gender
Male
295
41.4
Female
418
58.6
Ethnicity
Kinh
580
81.3
Non-Kinh
133
18.7
Location
Plain
555
77.8
Mountain
158
22.2
Marital status
Married/reunion
417
58.5
Single/divorced/separated
31
4.3
Widowed
265
37.2
Education
Under primary
247
34.6
Primary
203
28.5
Secondary
182
25.5
High school and higher
81
11.4
Religion
Yes
13
1.8
No
700
98.2
Working status
Unemployed & retired
170
23.8
Still working
543
76.2
Household size
(Mean± SD)
(4.64±2.08)
1-2 people
152
21.3
3-4 people
148
20.8
5-6 people
290
40.7
Over 7 people
123
17.3
Wealth quintile
Richest
134
18.8
Richer
131
18.4
Middle
157
22.0
Poorer
152
21.3
Poorest
139
19.5
Health insurance
Yes
517
72.5
No
196
27.5


## 3.2. Health Status and Chronic Disease Prevalence

Self-rated health status, body mass indexes (BMIs), and the prevalence of a chronic disease diagnosis by a doctor within 12 months are summarized in Table2. The mean score of the self-rated health status was 58.4 (it ranged from 2 to 100) and tended to decrease with aging. Participants’ average BMI scores were 19.9. Most of the participants (66.9%) were categorized within the “normal range” according to current WHO BMI cut-off points [21], but 16.3% of participants were mildly underweight (17.0–18.49 kg/m2), 5.0% were moderately underweight (16.0–16.9 kg/m2), and 7.9% of participants were severely underweight (<16 kg/m2). The total mean score for social capital in this study was 3.52 (0.487) on a 5-point scale. The average score for the first domain (trust in daily life), which was asking about one’s generalized trust in everyday life, was 4.17 (0.490). The other domain, which asked questions concerning how one felt about neighbors’ attitudes toward helping them when they were in an emergency situation, scored 3.00 (0.628). There are no statistically significant relationships between social capital and other variables such as age, gender, and wealth quintile. Musculoskeletal disorders were the most frequently reported chronic disease among all age groups (50.8%), followed by hypertension (31.6%), gastrointestinal diseases (17.3%), and cardiovascular diseases (7.9%). Very few cases of cancer or diabetes were reported.Table 2
Health status and chronic disease prevalence of sample (N=713).
Variables
60 s
70 s
Over 80
Total
n
%
n
%
n
%
n
%
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Self-rated health status
Good
89
23.6
20
10.3
11
7.7
120
16.8
Normal
212
56.2
115
59.3
70
49.3
398
55.7
Bad
76
20.2
59
30.4
61
43.0
196
27.5
BMI
20.6
2.57
19.4
2.63
18.9
2.78
19.9
2.72
Severely underweight
17
4.5
13
6.7
26
18.3
56
7.9
Moderately underweight
11
2.9
19
9.8
6
4.2
36
5.0
Mildly underweight
46
12.2
40
20.6
30
21.1
116
16.3
Normal
282
74.8
118
60.8
77
54.2
477
66.9
Overweight
21
5.6
4
2.1
3
2.1
28
3.9
Recent smoker∗ (n=192)
Yes
71
53.0
13
34.2
4
20.0
88
45.8
Drinks in a month† (n=198)
Yes
111
79.3
22
64.7
12
50.0
145
73.2
Social capital
Trust in daily life
4.17
0.497
4.17
0.465
4.19
0.507
4.17
0.490
Trust in urgent need
3.04
0.631
2.98
0.605
2.94
0.651
3.00
0.628
Total
3.54
0.496
3.51
0.478
3.49
0.473
3.52
0.487
Diagnosed chronic disease
Hypertension
102
27.1
69
35.6
54
38.0
225
31.6
Diabetes
14
3.7
7
3.6
5
3.5
26
3.6
Cancer
1
0.3
2
1.0
1
0.7
4
0.6
Neuropsychiatric diseases
16
4.2
5
2.6
6
4.2
27
3.8
Cardiovascular diseases
32
8.5
14
7.2
10
7.0
56
7.9
Respiratory diseases
20
5.3
11
5.7
14
9.9
45
6.3
Asthma/COPD
19
5.0
10
5.2
9
6.3
38
5.3
Liver-related diseases
23
6.1
5
2.6
1
0.7
29
4.1
Kidney-related diseases
29
7.7
10
5.2
5
3.5
44
6.2
Gastrointestinal diseases
82
21.8
28
14.4
13
9.2
123
17.3
Musculoskeletal diseases
180
47.7
103
53.1
79
55.6
362
50.8
Movement impaired
11
2.9
3
1.5
4
2.8
18
2.5
Others
46
12.2
31
16.0
19
13.4
96
13.5
∗The person who smokes at the present. †The person who has used alcohol beverages in the last month.


## 3.3. Functional Status

The distribution of participants on the basis of the functional status of different groups is presented in Table3. Functioning assessment scores were significantly different between gender and age groups, and the number of NCDs was significantly associated with functional status. Participants with more than three NCDs scored lowest in terms of their functioning status.Table 3
Functioning assessment according to general characteristics.
Variables
Functional limitation
p
Post hoc
‡
Mean
SD
Age groups
60 sa
1.609
0.811
0.000
a < b < c
70 sb
2.012
0.940
Over 80c
2.548
1.089
Gender
Male
1.718
0.887
0.000
Female
2.038
1.015
Ethnicity
Kinh
1.936
0.981
0.086
Non-Kinh
1.775
0.947
Location
Plain
1.940
0.987
0.080
Mountain
1.786
0.932
Marital status
Married/reuniona
1.766
0.942
0.000
a < c
Single/divorced/separatedb
1.906
0.904
Widowedc
2.126
1.001
Education
Under primarya
2.202
1.101
0.000
a > b, c, d
Primaryb
1.850
0.909
Secondaryc
1.667
0.817
High school and higherd
1.681
0.838
Religion
Yes
1.730
0.627
0.514
No
1.909
0.982
Working status
Unemployed & retired
2.061
1.063
0.017
Still working
1.857
0.944
Household size
1-2 people
1.875
0.929
0.766
3-4 people
1.848
0.946
5-6 people
1.942
0.979
Over 7 people
1.930
1.067
Wealth quintile
Richest
1.800
0.880
0.083
Richer
1.874
0.910
Middle
1.840
0.959
Poorer
2.096
1.073
Poorest
1.905
1.018
Health insurance
Yes
1.940
0.997
0.134
No
1.817
0.917
Recent smoker∗
Yes
1.572
0.786
0.055
No
1.828
1.012
Drinks in a month†
Yes
1.574
0.759
0.000
No
2.142
1.184
Self-rated health status
Gooda
1.310
0.592
0.000
a
<
b
<
c
Normalb
1.739
0.806
Badc
2.608
1.086
BMI
Severely underweighta
2.591
1.214
0.000
b, c, d, e < a  d < c
Moderately underweightb
2.047
0.921
Mildly underweightc
2.004
0.971
Normal ranged
1.769
0.924
Overweighte
1.814
0.851
Number of NCDs
0a
1.505
0.625
0.000
a
<
b, c<d
1b
1.894
0.846
2c
2.016
0.913
3 and overd
2.233
0.964
n
∗
=
192, n†=198; LSD‡.


## 3.4. Health-Related Quality of Life

The mean indices of the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as measured by EQ-5D-3L are presented in Table4. The HRQoL decreased significantly with age. Men and Non-Kinh had higher indices than women and Kinh. Married or reunited people had higher HRQoLs than those who were widowed. The group with less than a primary school education had lower indices than other groups. HRQoL indices increased with a higher self-rated health status. Participants within a normal BMI range had higher indices than those who were underweight, and particularly those who were severely underweight had significantly lower indices than those who were moderately underweight, mildly underweight, and within the normal weight range group. A greater number of noncommunicable diseases were associated with lower HRQoL indices.Table 4
Health-related quality of life according to socioeconomics and health status.
Variables
Health-related quality of life
p
Post hoc
‡
Mean
SD
Age groups
60 sa
0.883
0.140
0.000
a
>
b
>
c
70 sb
0.838
0.148
Over 80c
0.759
0.239
Gender
Male
0.872
0.140
0.001
Female
0.828
0.190
Ethnicity
Kinh
0.840
0.172
0.048
Non-Kinh
0.873
0.172
Location
Plain
0.840
0.171
0.059
Mountain
0.869
0.175
Marital status
Married/reuniona
0.862
0.160
0.013
a
>
c
Single/divorced/separatedb
0.833
0.214
Widowedc
0.823
0.184
Education
Under primary
0.797
0.216
0.000
a
<
b, c, d
Primary
0.858
0.858
Secondary
0.886
0.124
High school and higher
0.879
0.123
Religion
Yes
0.847
0.110
0.980
No
0.846
0.173
Working status
Unemployed & retired
0.826
0.196
0.076
Still working
0.853
0.164
Household size
1-2 people
0.860
0.138
0.145
3-4 people
0.865
0.117
5-6 people
0.839
0.192
Over 7 people
0.824
0.211
Wealth quintile
Richest
0.860
0.142
0.358
Richer
0.845
0.176
Middle
0.862
0.163
Poorer
0.827
0.160
Poorest
0.837
0.215
Health insurance
Yes
0.842
0.179
0.288
No
0.857
0.155
Recent smoker∗
Yes
0.880
0.141
0.416
No
0.863
0.137
Drinks in a month†
Yes
0.889
0.119
0.593
No
0.877
0.175
Self-rated health status
Gooda
0.932
0.048
0.000
a
>
b
>
c
Normalb
0.878
0.117
Badc
0.730
0.244
BMI
Severely underweighta
0.739
0.234
0.000
a
<
b, c<d
Moderately underweightb
0.789
0.217
Mildly underweightc
0.825
0.180
Normal ranged
0.867
0.154
Overweighte
0.872
0.123
Number of NCDs
0a
0.914
0.072
0.000
a
>
b, c>d
1b
0.854
0.167
2c
0.832
0.177
3 overd
0.772
0.221
n
∗
=
192, n†=198; LSD‡.Multiple regression analyses were performed to identify the determining factors of elderly participants’ HRQoL (Table5). Model 1 used socioeconomic variables as independents, and Model 2 included additional variables to examine the effects of health-related factors after controlling socioeconomic variables. As shown in Table 5, the factors of age, self-rated health status, BMI, and number of NCDs were significant determinants of elderly participants’ HRQoL.Table 5
Multiple regression coefficients for significant factors of HRQoL.
Variables†
Model 1
Model 2
β
∗
S
E
p
β
S
E
p
Constant
0.886
0.040
1.006
0.047
Age group
-
0.051
0.009
0.000
-
0.032
0.008
0.000
Gender
-
0.024
0.014
0.096
-
0.016
0.013
0.226
Ethnicity
0.037
0.016
0.017
0.019
0.015
0.203
Marital status
0.004
0.008
0.608
0.002
0.007
0.833
Education
0.015
0.007
0.036
0.010
0.007
0.142
Self-rated health
-
0.076
0.010
0.000
BMI
0.018
0.006
0.005
Number of NCDs
-
0.022
0.006
0.000
R
2
0.093
0.233
∗Unstandardized coefficients; †reference category: age 60–69, male, non-Kinh, married/reunion, under primary school, good self-rated health, severely underweight, and having no NCDs.


## 3.5. Healthcare Needs

### 3.5.1. Needed Healthcare Related Information

The number of respondents who expressed a need for health-related information was 387 (54.3%). These needs were categorized into seven areas: disease management, diet, pain management, exercise, general health, disease prevention, the health system, and others (Figure2). The information requested most often pertained to disease management (27.53%). Information was also requested for chronic diseases such as hypertension, arthritis, musculoskeletal diseases, diabetes, stomach, and rheumatoid diseases. Older adults were most interested in degenerative diseases than other acute diseases. In particular, the category of pain management accounted for 9.3% of the requests. The respondents expressed a need for healthy lifestyle–related information on diet (13.67%) and exercise (8.51%). General health information (6.73%) and that for disease prevention (3.5%) were also desired by the aged. Lastly, requests for practical information to help them assess a health facility’s quality accounted for 1.12% of the requested information.Figure 2
Needs on health-related information.


### 3.5.2. Needed Home Healthcare Services

The number of participants who needed home healthcare services including rehabilitation was 154 (21.6%). The health problems for which respondents want home healthcare services or rehabilitation were categorized and summarized in Figure3. The majority of needs related to caring for their own diseases (62.78%), and the rest to promoting their own health and well-being (11.62%), such as learning how to maintain a healthier life, and clarifying what appropriate care is for the elderly. The most frequently requested home healthcare service pertained to musculoskeletal diseases (40.1%), and included requests for walking-aids, help recovering motor function, and relief from muscle-aches. Other needs for home healthcare services related to caring for those with cardiovascular disease (11.1%), and sensory/dermatological problems (7.6%).Figure 3
Needs on home health care services.


## 3.5.1. Needed Healthcare Related Information

The number of respondents who expressed a need for health-related information was 387 (54.3%). These needs were categorized into seven areas: disease management, diet, pain management, exercise, general health, disease prevention, the health system, and others (Figure2). The information requested most often pertained to disease management (27.53%). Information was also requested for chronic diseases such as hypertension, arthritis, musculoskeletal diseases, diabetes, stomach, and rheumatoid diseases. Older adults were most interested in degenerative diseases than other acute diseases. In particular, the category of pain management accounted for 9.3% of the requests. The respondents expressed a need for healthy lifestyle–related information on diet (13.67%) and exercise (8.51%). General health information (6.73%) and that for disease prevention (3.5%) were also desired by the aged. Lastly, requests for practical information to help them assess a health facility’s quality accounted for 1.12% of the requested information.Figure 2
Needs on health-related information.


## 3.5.2. Needed Home Healthcare Services

The number of participants who needed home healthcare services including rehabilitation was 154 (21.6%). The health problems for which respondents want home healthcare services or rehabilitation were categorized and summarized in Figure3. The majority of needs related to caring for their own diseases (62.78%), and the rest to promoting their own health and well-being (11.62%), such as learning how to maintain a healthier life, and clarifying what appropriate care is for the elderly. The most frequently requested home healthcare service pertained to musculoskeletal diseases (40.1%), and included requests for walking-aids, help recovering motor function, and relief from muscle-aches. Other needs for home healthcare services related to caring for those with cardiovascular disease (11.1%), and sensory/dermatological problems (7.6%).Figure 3
Needs on home health care services.


## 4. Discussion

The results of this study are consistent with previous studies that found epidemiological patterns shifting from a predominance of communicable diseases to noncommunicable diseases in Vietnam [19, 20]. Of this study’s participants, 79% self-reported having a chronic disease that increased their households’ financial burdens. Interestingly, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cancer were rarely reported in this study, although they are the leading causes of death in Vietnam [21]. It is possible that elders may not be aware of the symptoms and progression of these diseases, and find them when they are in a later stage. Screenings and regular health checkups may be critical for the elderly population, to ensure early detection and disease prevention.The study’s findings are not consistent with those of a previous systematic literature review that found a significant relationship between recent smoking behaviors, alcohol consumption, and the level of functioning. We suspect that this is because the systematic literature review primarily included research studies that had been conducted in highly developed countries [21].The results of this study were similar to those of Hoi et al.’s study [3], which reported that the HRQoL of older people in rural Vietnam was affected by economic status, educational level, and marital status. After controlling for the effects of socioeconomic variables, this study’s regression analysis indicated that self-rated health status, BMIs, and the number of NCDs were significant predictors of HRQoL. Thus, the quality of life among older people may be greatly increased by moving toward healthy lifestyles that include healthy diets and exercise, chronic disease management, and subjective well-being.Meanwhile, even though more people recognize the importance of healthy lifestyles in modern society, older people’s smoking and drinking habits are not easily changed. An et al. [22] reported that adults living in urban areas were more knowledgeable about the harmful health effects of active and passive smoking than those living in rural areas, and these significant differences in knowledge were related to access to health information. The fact that more than half of the participants in this study required health information from health professionals indicates a need to develop strategies for providing information efficiently to elderly people in rural areas.The results of this study documented the various needs for healthcare and rehabilitation services among Vietnam’s elderly population. Physical disabilities and functional limitations are common among older people [23] and lead to adverse consequences such as dependency and morbidity, the increased utilization of healthcare, and a need for supportive services and long term care [24]. Hairi et al. [24] reported that the prevalence of functional limitations was 20% in older Malaysians, and advancing age, gender (more women than men), the presence of arthritis, and having a depressive symptomology were significantly associated with functional limitations. This study found that elders were in great need of obtaining health information to manage chronic illness and improve their health in general by adopting healthy lifestyles.Along with the increase in the proportion of the population that is aging, and the increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases, readily accessible community-based primary care is critical. A Vietnamese commune health center is located in a community which covers 25,000 people. The roles of these centers should be strengthened to address effectively the elderly population’s needs for health care services, particularly in rural areas. The WHO has emphasized the importance of community-based primary health services. Community health centers may become critical healthcare service providers for managing chronic illnesses, promoting healthy lifestyles and behaviors, reducing health risks, preventing diseases, promoting health, and improving the elderly population’s quality of life.The study’s findings are limited by certain factors. First, the study’s participants were limited to the elderly living in the rural Quoc-Oai district of Hanoi, using stratified proportion sampling, and quota assignment. Thus, to validate the generalizability of the results for the rural elderly in Vietnam, the study should have involved more participants from different regions and districts. Second, the data was collected through a survey questionnaire, and the information obtained from the study participants was assumed to be accurate. Further research is required to examine the correlates and predictors of health outcomes, and to investigate the effectiveness and feasibility of community health center-based, nurse-led, chronic illness management programs for the rural elderly in Vietnam.


## 5. Conclusions

The aging proportion of Vietnam’s population is growing rapidly. The burden of providing healthcare for non-communicable diseases continues to increase as a consequence. It is vital that health challenges and the healthcare needs of older adults be assessed. Furthermore, it is important that healthcare services be easily accessible and address the elderly population’s increasing needs for chronic illness management, risk reduction, help adopting healthy lifestyles, and improving their quality of life.



---

*Source: 4830968-2017-09-24.xml*