# Potential Biomarkers of Peripheral and Central Fatigue in High-Intensity Trained Athletes at High-Temperature: A Pilot Study withMomordica charantia (Bitter Melon)

Authors: Jae-Jun Kwak; Jang Soo Yook; Min-Seong Ha
Journal: Journal of Immunology Research
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

Among potent dietary supplements,Momordica charantia, commonly called bitter melon, has various biological effects, such as antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, and improves energy metabolism and fatigue recovery. However, it is unknown whether Momordica charantia extract (MCE) induces antifatigue effects during exercise training in high-temperature environments. This study aimed at investigating the efficacy of MCE by examining 10 male tennis players consuming 100 mL MCE/dose (6 times a day over 4 weeks) during the summer training season. Peripheral (ammonia and uric acid) and central (serotonin, dopamine, and prolactin) fatigue parameters were measured before and after MCE consumption; before, during, and after exercise; and the next morning. After consuming MCE supplements, ammonia levels were higher during and after exercise and recovered the next morning, whereas uric acid levels did not change at any time point. Serotonin levels were lower during exercise. Dopamine levels were higher, especially during exercise. Prolactin levels were lower at all time points, especially during and after exercise. Although high-intensity training in a hot environment causes accumulation of fatigue-related metabolites, our results indicate that 4 weeks of MCE intake positively influenced fatigue parameters, suggesting that MCE can efficiently combat fatigue.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Recent studies have reported diverse approaches to modulate athletes’ physical condition and improve performance, such as the use of supplements derived from a variety of sources [1, 2]. In general, the main purposes of supplements are to improve immune function and prevent disease as well as to relieve dizziness, muscle damage, and cramps [3]. For athletes, in particular, supplements may relieve thirst during high-intensity training, supply moderate energy, and improve exercise performance, training adaptations, and fatigue resistance [4, 5]. In fact, the American College of Sports Medicine recommends taking supplements when exercising for longer than 1 hour, as they can help improve physiological function and maintain athletic performance during competitions [6].Of the newer supplements being explored, there has been a focus on the use of natural plant extracts as added ingredients to sports drinks [7–9]. One of these extracts is from Momordica charantia (M. charantia), an annual vine of the gourd family (Cucurbitaceae) also called bitter melon owing to the bitter taste of the unripe fruit. It is used in highly nutritious drinks and as a medicinal plant in China and Japan because of its antioxidant activity, antidiabetic activity, and anti-inflammatory effect for improving human health [10–13]. Momordica charantia contains phytosterol glycosides, amino acids, galacturonate, citrulline, saponin, vitamin B1, beta carotene, soluble fibers, and potassium and is especially abundant in minerals, such as K, Ca, Mg, and Fe, as well as in vitamin C, which plays an important role in energy conversion [14, 15]. In addition, previous in vivo studies showed that M. charantia extract (MCE) from bitter melon exhibits physiological effects on energy metabolism via activation of activated AMP-activated protein kinase [16, 17] and also enhanced exercise performance in exhausted conditions with improved fatigue-related parameters such as lactate and ammonia [18]. These evidences lead us to postulate that MCE may affect fatigue resistance in trained athletes.Fatigue due to continuous exercise is broadly divided into peripheral fatigue and central fatigue [19]. Peripheral fatigue decreases physical function owing to stimuli caused by a long period of exercise and refers specifically to fatigue in active muscles [20]. During peripheral fatigue, muscles have difficulty continuing to contract owing to depletion of creatine phosphate, neuromuscular signal transmitters, and glycogen [20, 21]. Central fatigue is fatigue that is perceived in the central nervous system (CNS) and is caused by changes in central neurotransmitters, such as serotonin, dopamine, and prolactin [22, 23]. Central fatigue symptoms manifest as psychological loss of motivation, loss of appetite, sleepiness, and reduced psychological alertness [24]. In high-temperature environments, the response of the CNS is closely related to central fatigue symptoms despite sufficient energy sources [25].When training in a hot and humid environment, athletes sweat excessively, and the loss of moisture can cause physiological injury due to dehydration and exhaustion [26]. If water intake is insufficient, the blood becomes concentrated, resulting in hyperosmolarity, reduced plasma volume, and reduced blood flow, which in turn impair the release of heat from the body, causing heat retention [27]. Ultimately, loss of moisture through sweating leads to dehydration, reduced energy metabolism and exercise performance, and increased heat production in the body [28]. In addition, glycogen is more readily utilized as an energy source, resulting in an increased production of the byproducts that cause fatigue [29]. Thus, athletes performing high-intensity training in hot environments show high levels of peripheral and central fatigue, and it is important to find methods to alleviate the subsequent symptoms to ensure that athletes stay healthy and perform optimally.The aim of our study was to determine the effects of regular intake of MCE on fatigue parameters in tennis athletes participating in a summer training program. To our knowledge, this was the first pilot study to analyze fatigue-related blood biomarkers in athletes who consumed MCE as a supplement. We hypothesized that tennis players consuming MCE on a regular basis would experience delayed fatigue and improved post-fatigue recovery measured by central and peripheral fatigue parameters during 4 weeks of high-intensity training in a high-temperature environment.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Participants

The subjects in our study were male tennis players enrolled at Pusan National University, South Korea (Table1). Prior to the study, the subjects were thoroughly informed of the research aims and intentions, and written consent forms were collected. The study plan adheres to the guidelines and ethical principles of the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the Pusan National University institutional review board (PNU IRB/2017_72_HR). The subjects underwent physical examination and testing as well as a medical interview by a physician to verify that they had no injuries or neurological or musculoskeletal disorders that could affect the experiment. Consumption of nutritional supplements and caffeinated beverages, alcohol, and antioxidant drugs was forbidden starting one month before the study, and intake of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and supplements other than the MCE was restricted during the study period. The subjects participated in training on a regular basis, and additional personal exercise outside of team training was not permitted.Table 1
Physical characteristics of study participants.
VariableContentAge (years)22.20±0.90Height (cm)177.20±6.70Weight (kg)70.80±12.30BMI (kg/m2)22.30±2.90Careers (years)5.90±2.70Values are expressed as mean and standard deviation.


### 2.2. Study Design

This pilot study involving 10 tennis players investigated the effects of MCE on peripheral and central fatigue parameters. The subjects consumed MCE during 4 weeks of summer training. MCE was consumed 6 times/day at 100 mL/dose. Three doses were administered, with one dose each before, during, and after the exercise both in the morning and afternoon, with a total of 6 doses and 600 mL per day. Central fatigue parameters (serotonin, dopamine, and prolactin) and peripheral fatigue parameters (ammonia and uric acid) were measured before, during, and after exercise and the morning following exercise before consumption of MCE (week 0) and after consumption of MCE on a regular basis (week 4). Summer training was performed at 70–90% heart rate reserve, rating of perceived exertion 15–19 for aerobic exercise/tennis training and 60–85% one-repetition maximum, OMNI RES 6–8 for resistance exercise, for 120 minutes twice per day (morning: aerobic and resistance; afternoon: tennis), 5 days per week, for a total of 4 weeks, intending to improve physical condition and technique. For successful completion of the study, the researchers monitored, in real-time, not only the training program but also the subjects’ lifestyle (camp accommodation, nutritional intake (analyzed by a computer-aided nutrition analysis program through a 24-hour recall method record; CAN Pro. Ver 3.0, The Korean Nutrition Society, Seoul, Korea; see Table2), additional exercise, medical treatments, etc.).Table 2
Changes in nutritional intake according to dietary intake during summer season training before and after MCE supplementation.
VariableBefore experimentAfter experimentt-valuep-valueTotal energy (kcal/day)1550.91±717.271821.95±893.91-1.4680.153Carbohydrate (g/day)208.22±70.34240.61±111.43-1.3150.199Lipid (g/day)50.55±37.2660.78±42.82-1.2680.215Protein (g/day)53.10±28.7459.29±16.05-1.1700.251Fiber (g/day)16.04±8.3416.69±8.37-0.3350.740Ash (g/day)13.17±5.5215.13±4.32-1.6960.101Values are expressed as mean and standard deviation.


### 2.3. MCE Sampling

Momordica charantia produced in South Korea, which contains biologically active compounds, such as polypeptides, saponins, alkaloids, flavonoids, phenolic acids, and carotenoids [30, 31], was used in this study. The basic constituents of MCE were analyzed by the Korea Food Research Institute and Pukyong National University Food Analysis Center, and the results are shown in Table 3. MCE samples were prepared as per methods verified in the previous studies of natural plants [7, 8, 32]. After adding 4 kg of fresh M. charantia and 6000 mL of hot water into an extractor, extraction was performed for 3 h at a temperature of 100°C and a pressure of 0.7 kg/cm2. MCE was sealed in small plastic bags in 100 mL portions and stored in a refrigerator.Table 3
Ingredients of MCE (g/100 g).
VariableContentNatrium10.40Vitamin C6.420Calorie0.40Carbohydrate0.10Analyzed by the Korea Food Research Institute and Pukyong National University Food Analysis Center.


### 2.4. Summer Training

The summer training program was devised by modifying a program designed by Kwak et al. [32]. In the summer training season, the average temperature reached 32.14°C±2.20°C. The athletes trained 120 min, twice/day (morning and afternoon), 5 days/week, for a total of 4 weeks, with the aim of improving physical condition and performance. Each training session consisted of 10 minutes each of warm-up and cool-down exercises and a 100-minute session of the main exercise. Throughout the training duration, athletes performed basic physical conditioning, specialized technique training, aerobic training, and weight training. The specific training contents are shown in Table 4. Exercise intensity was analyzed by measuring changes in heart rate using a heart rate monitor watch (Polar RS400sd; model APAC, 90026360; Polar, NY, USA) and Borg’s rating of perceived exertion [33], one-repetition maximum, and OMNI resistance scale of perceived exertion (RES) [34]. All training sessions were supervised by the researchers.Table 4
Summer season daily training program.
WeeksTimeMain exerciseSpecific programIntensityFrequency1–410 : 00–10 : 10Warm-upDynamic stretching (upper and lower joint body)40%–60% HRR RPE 12–145 times/week10 : 10–11 : 00Aerobic trainingBuffy test, arm walking, stairs run, shuttle run (20 m)70%–90% HRR RPE 15–1920–30 times/3 setSet rest: 60 s11 : 00–11 : 10Rest11 : 10–12 : 00Resistance trainingChest, shoulder, back, arm (biceps, triceps, and wrist), lower body and abdominal60%–85% 1RM OMNI RES 6–815 times/3 setSet rest: 60 s12 : 00–12 : 10Cool-downStatic stretching (upper and lower joint body)20%–40% HRR RPE 9–11Free time15 : 00–15 : 10Warm-upTennis court running (3 raps) and dynamic stretching (upper and lower joint body)40%–60% HRR RPE 12–1415 : 10–16 : 00Skill-related trainingForehand groundstroke, backhand groundstroke, and running groundstroke70%–90% HRR RPE 15–1920 times/3 setSet rest: 60 s16 : 00–16 : 10Rest16 : 10–17 : 00Skill-related trainingForehand volley, backhand volley, and jump smashing (connect/rotation)70%–90% HRR RPE 15–1930 times/3 setSet rest: 60 s17 : 00–17 : 10Rest16 : 20–17 : 00GameSingle game (1 set/6 games)70%–90% HRR RPE 15–1917 : 00–17 : 10Cool-downTennis court running (2 raps) and static stretching (upper and lower joint body)20%–60% HRR RPE 10–14HRR: heart rate reserve; RPE: rate of perceived exertion; 1RM: one-repetition maximum; RES: resistance scale of perceived exertion.


### 2.5. Biochemical Analysis

Blood samples were collected before (week 0 of training) and after (week 4 of training) consuming MCE, making a total of 8 samples. After collecting 10 mL of blood from a forearm vein, the blood was centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 rpm using a centrifuge (Combi-514R; Hanil, Gimpo, Korea), and the plasma was isolated for analysis. The collected plasma was used to analyze peripheral fatigue (ammonia and uric acid) and central fatigue (serotonin, dopamine, and prolactin) parameters.


### 2.6. Sample Size Calculation

The optimal sample size was determined using the G-power version 3.1 Windows program (Kiel University, Kiel, Germany), based on a 0.25-point effect size (default), alpha level ofp<0.05, and 30% power [35]. The results indicated that 8 participants per group were needed. Assuming a dropout rate of 20%, the sample size was set to 10 participants.


### 2.7. Statistical Analysis

SPSS version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data processing. The mean and standard deviation were calculated for measured variables; repeated measure analyses of variance were performed to test the effects before and after MCE supplementation and between time points; and pairedt-tests were performed to compare specific differences in fatigue indicators between time points. For all tests, a statistical significance level of p<0.05 was used.


## 2.1. Participants

The subjects in our study were male tennis players enrolled at Pusan National University, South Korea (Table1). Prior to the study, the subjects were thoroughly informed of the research aims and intentions, and written consent forms were collected. The study plan adheres to the guidelines and ethical principles of the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the Pusan National University institutional review board (PNU IRB/2017_72_HR). The subjects underwent physical examination and testing as well as a medical interview by a physician to verify that they had no injuries or neurological or musculoskeletal disorders that could affect the experiment. Consumption of nutritional supplements and caffeinated beverages, alcohol, and antioxidant drugs was forbidden starting one month before the study, and intake of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and supplements other than the MCE was restricted during the study period. The subjects participated in training on a regular basis, and additional personal exercise outside of team training was not permitted.Table 1
Physical characteristics of study participants.
VariableContentAge (years)22.20±0.90Height (cm)177.20±6.70Weight (kg)70.80±12.30BMI (kg/m2)22.30±2.90Careers (years)5.90±2.70Values are expressed as mean and standard deviation.


## 2.2. Study Design

This pilot study involving 10 tennis players investigated the effects of MCE on peripheral and central fatigue parameters. The subjects consumed MCE during 4 weeks of summer training. MCE was consumed 6 times/day at 100 mL/dose. Three doses were administered, with one dose each before, during, and after the exercise both in the morning and afternoon, with a total of 6 doses and 600 mL per day. Central fatigue parameters (serotonin, dopamine, and prolactin) and peripheral fatigue parameters (ammonia and uric acid) were measured before, during, and after exercise and the morning following exercise before consumption of MCE (week 0) and after consumption of MCE on a regular basis (week 4). Summer training was performed at 70–90% heart rate reserve, rating of perceived exertion 15–19 for aerobic exercise/tennis training and 60–85% one-repetition maximum, OMNI RES 6–8 for resistance exercise, for 120 minutes twice per day (morning: aerobic and resistance; afternoon: tennis), 5 days per week, for a total of 4 weeks, intending to improve physical condition and technique. For successful completion of the study, the researchers monitored, in real-time, not only the training program but also the subjects’ lifestyle (camp accommodation, nutritional intake (analyzed by a computer-aided nutrition analysis program through a 24-hour recall method record; CAN Pro. Ver 3.0, The Korean Nutrition Society, Seoul, Korea; see Table2), additional exercise, medical treatments, etc.).Table 2
Changes in nutritional intake according to dietary intake during summer season training before and after MCE supplementation.
VariableBefore experimentAfter experimentt-valuep-valueTotal energy (kcal/day)1550.91±717.271821.95±893.91-1.4680.153Carbohydrate (g/day)208.22±70.34240.61±111.43-1.3150.199Lipid (g/day)50.55±37.2660.78±42.82-1.2680.215Protein (g/day)53.10±28.7459.29±16.05-1.1700.251Fiber (g/day)16.04±8.3416.69±8.37-0.3350.740Ash (g/day)13.17±5.5215.13±4.32-1.6960.101Values are expressed as mean and standard deviation.


## 2.3. MCE Sampling

Momordica charantia produced in South Korea, which contains biologically active compounds, such as polypeptides, saponins, alkaloids, flavonoids, phenolic acids, and carotenoids [30, 31], was used in this study. The basic constituents of MCE were analyzed by the Korea Food Research Institute and Pukyong National University Food Analysis Center, and the results are shown in Table 3. MCE samples were prepared as per methods verified in the previous studies of natural plants [7, 8, 32]. After adding 4 kg of fresh M. charantia and 6000 mL of hot water into an extractor, extraction was performed for 3 h at a temperature of 100°C and a pressure of 0.7 kg/cm2. MCE was sealed in small plastic bags in 100 mL portions and stored in a refrigerator.Table 3
Ingredients of MCE (g/100 g).
VariableContentNatrium10.40Vitamin C6.420Calorie0.40Carbohydrate0.10Analyzed by the Korea Food Research Institute and Pukyong National University Food Analysis Center.


## 2.4. Summer Training

The summer training program was devised by modifying a program designed by Kwak et al. [32]. In the summer training season, the average temperature reached 32.14°C±2.20°C. The athletes trained 120 min, twice/day (morning and afternoon), 5 days/week, for a total of 4 weeks, with the aim of improving physical condition and performance. Each training session consisted of 10 minutes each of warm-up and cool-down exercises and a 100-minute session of the main exercise. Throughout the training duration, athletes performed basic physical conditioning, specialized technique training, aerobic training, and weight training. The specific training contents are shown in Table 4. Exercise intensity was analyzed by measuring changes in heart rate using a heart rate monitor watch (Polar RS400sd; model APAC, 90026360; Polar, NY, USA) and Borg’s rating of perceived exertion [33], one-repetition maximum, and OMNI resistance scale of perceived exertion (RES) [34]. All training sessions were supervised by the researchers.Table 4
Summer season daily training program.
WeeksTimeMain exerciseSpecific programIntensityFrequency1–410 : 00–10 : 10Warm-upDynamic stretching (upper and lower joint body)40%–60% HRR RPE 12–145 times/week10 : 10–11 : 00Aerobic trainingBuffy test, arm walking, stairs run, shuttle run (20 m)70%–90% HRR RPE 15–1920–30 times/3 setSet rest: 60 s11 : 00–11 : 10Rest11 : 10–12 : 00Resistance trainingChest, shoulder, back, arm (biceps, triceps, and wrist), lower body and abdominal60%–85% 1RM OMNI RES 6–815 times/3 setSet rest: 60 s12 : 00–12 : 10Cool-downStatic stretching (upper and lower joint body)20%–40% HRR RPE 9–11Free time15 : 00–15 : 10Warm-upTennis court running (3 raps) and dynamic stretching (upper and lower joint body)40%–60% HRR RPE 12–1415 : 10–16 : 00Skill-related trainingForehand groundstroke, backhand groundstroke, and running groundstroke70%–90% HRR RPE 15–1920 times/3 setSet rest: 60 s16 : 00–16 : 10Rest16 : 10–17 : 00Skill-related trainingForehand volley, backhand volley, and jump smashing (connect/rotation)70%–90% HRR RPE 15–1930 times/3 setSet rest: 60 s17 : 00–17 : 10Rest16 : 20–17 : 00GameSingle game (1 set/6 games)70%–90% HRR RPE 15–1917 : 00–17 : 10Cool-downTennis court running (2 raps) and static stretching (upper and lower joint body)20%–60% HRR RPE 10–14HRR: heart rate reserve; RPE: rate of perceived exertion; 1RM: one-repetition maximum; RES: resistance scale of perceived exertion.


## 2.5. Biochemical Analysis

Blood samples were collected before (week 0 of training) and after (week 4 of training) consuming MCE, making a total of 8 samples. After collecting 10 mL of blood from a forearm vein, the blood was centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 rpm using a centrifuge (Combi-514R; Hanil, Gimpo, Korea), and the plasma was isolated for analysis. The collected plasma was used to analyze peripheral fatigue (ammonia and uric acid) and central fatigue (serotonin, dopamine, and prolactin) parameters.


## 2.6. Sample Size Calculation

The optimal sample size was determined using the G-power version 3.1 Windows program (Kiel University, Kiel, Germany), based on a 0.25-point effect size (default), alpha level ofp<0.05, and 30% power [35]. The results indicated that 8 participants per group were needed. Assuming a dropout rate of 20%, the sample size was set to 10 participants.


## 2.7. Statistical Analysis

SPSS version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data processing. The mean and standard deviation were calculated for measured variables; repeated measure analyses of variance were performed to test the effects before and after MCE supplementation and between time points; and pairedt-tests were performed to compare specific differences in fatigue indicators between time points. For all tests, a statistical significance level of p<0.05 was used.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Effect of MCE Supplementation on Peripheral Fatigue

After MCE supplementation, ammonia levels in samples collected at week 4 were significantly higher before (t=−3.879, p≤0.001), during (t=−4.464, p<0.001), and immediately after exercise (t=−2.156, p<0.05) than those in samples collected at week 0 (Table 5; Figure 1(a)). The MCE supplementation showed a significant interaction effect with ammonia response (time×supplementationeffect: F=5.250, p<0.01; time effect: F=6.317, p<0.01; supplementation effect: F=24.883, p≤0.001) (Table 5). Analyses of changes in ammonia levels over time using samples collected before MCE supplementation revealed that ammonia levels were significantly higher during exercise (t=−5.272, p≤0.001), immediately after exercise (t=−6.014, p<0.001), and the morning after exercise (t=−3.063, p<0.05) than before exercise. After MCE supplementation, ammonia levels showed an increasing trend during and immediately after exercise, but there were no significant differences when compared to the levels before exercise. Notably, after MCE supplementation, ammonia levels were significantly higher the morning after exercise (t=2.344, p<0.05) than before exercise (Table 5; Figure 1(a)).Table 5
Changes in peripheral fatigue parameters during summer season training before and after MCE supplementation.
VariableBefore exerciseDuring exerciseAfter exerciseMorning after exerciseFAmmonia (μg/dL)Pre65.10±15.5492.80±14.11##103.60±25.37###90.45±19.82#T6.317$$Post113.60±36.36125.70±18.55135.10±38.6179.50±27.83#S24.883$$t-value3.879∗∗4.464∗∗∗2.156∗1.013T×S5.250$$Uric acid (mg/dL)Pre6.92±1.717.52±1.78##7.85±1.72##7.23±1.52T6.003$Post6.84±1.666.95±1.746.93±1.656.69±1.26S3.600t-value0.1060.7231.2220.464T×S4.192Values are mean and standard deviation.∗p<0.05, ∗∗p<0.01, ∗∗∗p<0.001 compared to the before-MCE supplementation values, #p<0.05, ##p<0.01, ###p<0.001 compared to the rest values. T: time effect; S: supplementation effect; T×S: time×supplementationinteractioneffect, $p<0.05, $$p<0.01.Figure 1
Comparison of peripheral fatigue parameters before and after MCE supplementation during the training program. (a) Both before and after MCE supplementation, ammonia levels increased from before, during, and after exercise and recovered by the next morning. Ammonia levels were higher after MCE supplementation and had a higher level of recovery. (b) Uric acid had a much lower increase after MCE supplementation than before MCE supplementation.∗p<0.05, ∗∗p<0.01, ∗∗∗p<0.001, compared to before-MCE supplementation values.
(a)(b)Uric acid levels showed no significant differences before and after MCE supplementation at any of the four time points; however, the mean uric acid levels were lower after MCE supplementation (Table5; Figure 1(b)). Regarding interaction effects, the time×supplementation interaction and supplementation effects were not significant, but there was a significant time effect (F=6.003, p<0.05). We analyzed the change in uric acid levels over time independently before and after MCE supplementation (Table 5; Figure 1(b)). Uric acid levels before MCE supplementation were significantly higher during (t=−3.947, p<0.01) and immediately after exercise (t=−4.422, p<0.01) than before exercise, and they also showed a trend toward decreased levels in samples collected the next morning, which was not statistically significant. After MCE supplementation, uric acid levels showed an increasing trend during exercise and immediately after exercise compared to those before exercise; however, the differences were not statistically significant. There was also no significant difference in the levels measured the next morning, but there was a trend toward lower uric acid levels before exercise.


### 3.2. Effect of MCE Supplementation on Central Fatigue

There was an effect on the pattern of serotonin response after MCE supplementation (time×supplementationinteractioneffect: F=3.134, p<0.05; time effect: F=12.791, p<0.01; supplementation effect: F=11.117, p<0.01) (Table 6). Serotonin levels were lower after than before supplement use, and this difference was significant during exercise (t=2.468, p<0.05) (Table 6; Figure 2(a)). We also analyzed the changes in serotonin over time independently before and after MCE supplementation. Before MCE supplementation, serotonin levels were significantly higher during (t=−5.382, p<0.001) and immediately after exercise (t=−3.978, p<0.01) than those before exercise, and there was a trend toward decreased levels the next morning. After MCE supplementation, serotonin levels were lower than those before supplementation, and they were significantly higher during (t=−2.688, p<0.05) and immediately after exercise (t=−6.432, p<0.001) than those before exercise but were lower than those before exercise the next morning (Table 6; Figure 2(a)).Table 6
Changes in central fatigue parameters during summer season training before and after MCE supplementation.
VariableBefore exerciseDuring exerciseAfter exerciseMsorning after exerciseFSerotonin (ng/mL)Pre122.48±27.54156.42±38.68###157.79±43.58##137.75±42.19T12.791$$Post114.76±25.30120.58±24.74#135.59±30.79###118.92±37.85S11.117$$t-value0.6532.468∗1.3161.051T×S3.134$Dopamine (ng/mL)Pre23.54±2.5521.55±2.99#24.71±4.2623.03±4.99T1.327Post24.93±2.9325.62±3.1125.76±2.6523.40±4.54S5.186$t-value1.1302.985∗0.662-0.174T×S0.954Prolactin (ng/mL)Pre24.53±11.5129.57±11.8131.41±20.3715.73±7.11T0.610Post18.63±6.5815.27±5.80##14.21±5.52#19.72±7.19S6.830$t-value1.4073.438∗∗2.577∗1.246T×S4.652$Values are mean and standard deviation.∗p<0.05, ∗∗p<0.01 compared to the before-MCE supplementation values, #p<0.05, ##p<0.01, ###p<0.001 compared to the rest values. T: time effect; S: supplementation effect; T×S: time×supplementation interaction effect, $p<0.05, $$p<0.01.Figure 2
Comparison of central fatigue parameters before and after MCE supplementation during the training program. (a) Serotonin levels were lower after MCE supplementation than before MCE supplementation, particularly during exercise. (b) Dopamine levels were higher after MCE supplementation than before MCE supplementation and showed increased levels during and immediately after exercise but decreased to below rest levels in the recovery phase the next morning. (c) Prolactin levels were lower after MCE supplementation than before MCE supplementation and were higher in the recovery phase than in the rest phase.∗p<0.05, ∗∗p<0.01 compared to before-MCE supplementation values.
(a)(b)(c)When we examined changes in dopamine, thetime×supplementation interaction and time effects were not significant, but there was a significant supplementation effect (F=5.186, p<0.05) (Table 6). When we analyzed the differences in dopamine levels before and after MCE use, dopamine levels were higher after MCE supplementation than before MCE supplementation, and this difference was especially notable during exercise (t=−2.985, p<0.01) (Table 6; Figure 2(b)). We also analyzed the changes in dopamine levels after time, independent of MCE supplementation. Before MCE supplementation, dopamine levels significantly decreased during exercise (t=2.628, p<0.05) compared to those before exercise, but they showed a trend toward slightly increased levels immediately after exercise. Dopamine levels measured the next morning were similar to those before exercise. Conversely, after MCE supplementation, there were no significant differences in dopamine levels between time points. However, there was a trend toward higher dopamine levels during and immediately after exercise, and the levels returned to normal before exercise the next morning (Table 6; Figure 2(b)).When we examined the changes in prolactin levels with MCE supplementation, thetime×supplementation interaction (F=4.652, p<0.05) and supplementation effects (F=6.830, p<0.05) were significant, but there was no significant time effect (Table 6). Analysis of differences in prolactin levels before and after MCE supplementation showed that prolactin levels after supplementation were lower and, in particular, were significantly lower during (t=3.438, p<0.01) and immediately after exercise (t=2.577, p<0.05) (Table 6; Figure 2(c)). We also examined the changes in prolactin levels over time, independent of MCE supplementation. Before MCE supplementation, prolactin showed a trend for increasing levels before, during, and after exercise, and then the levels lowered the next morning. However, after MCE supplementation, prolactin levels were significantly lower during (t=4.613, p≤0.001) and immediately after exercise (t=2.842, p<0.05) than those before exercise, and they returned to normal levels before exercise the next morning (Table 6; Figure 2(c)).


## 3.1. Effect of MCE Supplementation on Peripheral Fatigue

After MCE supplementation, ammonia levels in samples collected at week 4 were significantly higher before (t=−3.879, p≤0.001), during (t=−4.464, p<0.001), and immediately after exercise (t=−2.156, p<0.05) than those in samples collected at week 0 (Table 5; Figure 1(a)). The MCE supplementation showed a significant interaction effect with ammonia response (time×supplementationeffect: F=5.250, p<0.01; time effect: F=6.317, p<0.01; supplementation effect: F=24.883, p≤0.001) (Table 5). Analyses of changes in ammonia levels over time using samples collected before MCE supplementation revealed that ammonia levels were significantly higher during exercise (t=−5.272, p≤0.001), immediately after exercise (t=−6.014, p<0.001), and the morning after exercise (t=−3.063, p<0.05) than before exercise. After MCE supplementation, ammonia levels showed an increasing trend during and immediately after exercise, but there were no significant differences when compared to the levels before exercise. Notably, after MCE supplementation, ammonia levels were significantly higher the morning after exercise (t=2.344, p<0.05) than before exercise (Table 5; Figure 1(a)).Table 5
Changes in peripheral fatigue parameters during summer season training before and after MCE supplementation.
VariableBefore exerciseDuring exerciseAfter exerciseMorning after exerciseFAmmonia (μg/dL)Pre65.10±15.5492.80±14.11##103.60±25.37###90.45±19.82#T6.317$$Post113.60±36.36125.70±18.55135.10±38.6179.50±27.83#S24.883$$t-value3.879∗∗4.464∗∗∗2.156∗1.013T×S5.250$$Uric acid (mg/dL)Pre6.92±1.717.52±1.78##7.85±1.72##7.23±1.52T6.003$Post6.84±1.666.95±1.746.93±1.656.69±1.26S3.600t-value0.1060.7231.2220.464T×S4.192Values are mean and standard deviation.∗p<0.05, ∗∗p<0.01, ∗∗∗p<0.001 compared to the before-MCE supplementation values, #p<0.05, ##p<0.01, ###p<0.001 compared to the rest values. T: time effect; S: supplementation effect; T×S: time×supplementationinteractioneffect, $p<0.05, $$p<0.01.Figure 1
Comparison of peripheral fatigue parameters before and after MCE supplementation during the training program. (a) Both before and after MCE supplementation, ammonia levels increased from before, during, and after exercise and recovered by the next morning. Ammonia levels were higher after MCE supplementation and had a higher level of recovery. (b) Uric acid had a much lower increase after MCE supplementation than before MCE supplementation.∗p<0.05, ∗∗p<0.01, ∗∗∗p<0.001, compared to before-MCE supplementation values.
(a)(b)Uric acid levels showed no significant differences before and after MCE supplementation at any of the four time points; however, the mean uric acid levels were lower after MCE supplementation (Table5; Figure 1(b)). Regarding interaction effects, the time×supplementation interaction and supplementation effects were not significant, but there was a significant time effect (F=6.003, p<0.05). We analyzed the change in uric acid levels over time independently before and after MCE supplementation (Table 5; Figure 1(b)). Uric acid levels before MCE supplementation were significantly higher during (t=−3.947, p<0.01) and immediately after exercise (t=−4.422, p<0.01) than before exercise, and they also showed a trend toward decreased levels in samples collected the next morning, which was not statistically significant. After MCE supplementation, uric acid levels showed an increasing trend during exercise and immediately after exercise compared to those before exercise; however, the differences were not statistically significant. There was also no significant difference in the levels measured the next morning, but there was a trend toward lower uric acid levels before exercise.


## 3.2. Effect of MCE Supplementation on Central Fatigue

There was an effect on the pattern of serotonin response after MCE supplementation (time×supplementationinteractioneffect: F=3.134, p<0.05; time effect: F=12.791, p<0.01; supplementation effect: F=11.117, p<0.01) (Table 6). Serotonin levels were lower after than before supplement use, and this difference was significant during exercise (t=2.468, p<0.05) (Table 6; Figure 2(a)). We also analyzed the changes in serotonin over time independently before and after MCE supplementation. Before MCE supplementation, serotonin levels were significantly higher during (t=−5.382, p<0.001) and immediately after exercise (t=−3.978, p<0.01) than those before exercise, and there was a trend toward decreased levels the next morning. After MCE supplementation, serotonin levels were lower than those before supplementation, and they were significantly higher during (t=−2.688, p<0.05) and immediately after exercise (t=−6.432, p<0.001) than those before exercise but were lower than those before exercise the next morning (Table 6; Figure 2(a)).Table 6
Changes in central fatigue parameters during summer season training before and after MCE supplementation.
VariableBefore exerciseDuring exerciseAfter exerciseMsorning after exerciseFSerotonin (ng/mL)Pre122.48±27.54156.42±38.68###157.79±43.58##137.75±42.19T12.791$$Post114.76±25.30120.58±24.74#135.59±30.79###118.92±37.85S11.117$$t-value0.6532.468∗1.3161.051T×S3.134$Dopamine (ng/mL)Pre23.54±2.5521.55±2.99#24.71±4.2623.03±4.99T1.327Post24.93±2.9325.62±3.1125.76±2.6523.40±4.54S5.186$t-value1.1302.985∗0.662-0.174T×S0.954Prolactin (ng/mL)Pre24.53±11.5129.57±11.8131.41±20.3715.73±7.11T0.610Post18.63±6.5815.27±5.80##14.21±5.52#19.72±7.19S6.830$t-value1.4073.438∗∗2.577∗1.246T×S4.652$Values are mean and standard deviation.∗p<0.05, ∗∗p<0.01 compared to the before-MCE supplementation values, #p<0.05, ##p<0.01, ###p<0.001 compared to the rest values. T: time effect; S: supplementation effect; T×S: time×supplementation interaction effect, $p<0.05, $$p<0.01.Figure 2
Comparison of central fatigue parameters before and after MCE supplementation during the training program. (a) Serotonin levels were lower after MCE supplementation than before MCE supplementation, particularly during exercise. (b) Dopamine levels were higher after MCE supplementation than before MCE supplementation and showed increased levels during and immediately after exercise but decreased to below rest levels in the recovery phase the next morning. (c) Prolactin levels were lower after MCE supplementation than before MCE supplementation and were higher in the recovery phase than in the rest phase.∗p<0.05, ∗∗p<0.01 compared to before-MCE supplementation values.
(a)(b)(c)When we examined changes in dopamine, thetime×supplementation interaction and time effects were not significant, but there was a significant supplementation effect (F=5.186, p<0.05) (Table 6). When we analyzed the differences in dopamine levels before and after MCE use, dopamine levels were higher after MCE supplementation than before MCE supplementation, and this difference was especially notable during exercise (t=−2.985, p<0.01) (Table 6; Figure 2(b)). We also analyzed the changes in dopamine levels after time, independent of MCE supplementation. Before MCE supplementation, dopamine levels significantly decreased during exercise (t=2.628, p<0.05) compared to those before exercise, but they showed a trend toward slightly increased levels immediately after exercise. Dopamine levels measured the next morning were similar to those before exercise. Conversely, after MCE supplementation, there were no significant differences in dopamine levels between time points. However, there was a trend toward higher dopamine levels during and immediately after exercise, and the levels returned to normal before exercise the next morning (Table 6; Figure 2(b)).When we examined the changes in prolactin levels with MCE supplementation, thetime×supplementation interaction (F=4.652, p<0.05) and supplementation effects (F=6.830, p<0.05) were significant, but there was no significant time effect (Table 6). Analysis of differences in prolactin levels before and after MCE supplementation showed that prolactin levels after supplementation were lower and, in particular, were significantly lower during (t=3.438, p<0.01) and immediately after exercise (t=2.577, p<0.05) (Table 6; Figure 2(c)). We also examined the changes in prolactin levels over time, independent of MCE supplementation. Before MCE supplementation, prolactin showed a trend for increasing levels before, during, and after exercise, and then the levels lowered the next morning. However, after MCE supplementation, prolactin levels were significantly lower during (t=4.613, p≤0.001) and immediately after exercise (t=2.842, p<0.05) than those before exercise, and they returned to normal levels before exercise the next morning (Table 6; Figure 2(c)).


## 4. Discussion

For the first time, this study determined the efficacy of pre- and post-MCE supplementation on ammonia, uric acid, serotonin, dopamine, and prolactin as a biomarker for peripheral and central fatigue in high-intensity trained tennis players participating in a four-week training program at high-temperature environments. Exercising in high temperatures raises body temperature, causing fatigue and imbalance of heat production and loss. If the body temperature increases to 40°C, it causes not only fatigue but also reduced or impaired CNS function and can be life-threatening [26, 27]. Our findings showed that MCE supplementation positively changed the levels of fatigue parameters in blood, which indicated that MCE exhibited a potential antifatigue effect for alleviating exercise and high-temperature fatigue.Ammonia, uric acid, and lactate dehydrogenase have been suggested as indicators to evaluate peripheral fatigue [36, 37]. A rapid removal of fatigue-related substances from the bloodstream is very important since it delays the decline in exercise performance and facilitates sustained exercise [19]. In this study, overall ammonia levels were higher after MCE supplementation than before MCE supplementation. Previous studies reported that, during high-intensity exercise, intramuscular acidification results in the release of ammonia [38]. Hence, the higher levels reported in this study can be interpreted as the result of increased exercise intensity, duration, and exposure to a high-temperature environment of summer training. It was expected that this would result in the degradation of protein and depletion of other sources to provide energy, thus producing ammonia as a by-product. Meanwhile, after MCE intake, ammonia significantly decreased the morning after exercise post the recovery period. It is believed that while moisture is lost owing to continual exercise in high temperatures, the electrolytes in MCE suppress hemoconcentration and loss of plasma volume while facilitating storage and supply of energy sources. In addition, MCE is believed to help protect against and prevent oxidative injury caused by the accumulation of ammonia during exercise. The results of this study related to symptoms of peripheral fatigue in human subjects are consistent with those of previous animal studies. For example, in one study of animals with induced hyperammonemia, MCE administration increased superoxide dismutase and catalase activity, inhibiting and improving oxidation [39]. In another animal study, MCE consumption reduced ammonia, lactate, serum creatine kinase, and blood urea nitrogen levels after exhaustion exercise [18]. Although our findings and previous reports suggest that ammonia levels as a fatigue-related parameter were positively modulated by MCE supplementation, the mechanisms underlying the effects of MCE remain. Recently, Chen et al. reported that hyperammonemia impairs energy metabolism by causing dysfunction of skeletal muscle mitochondria, which are repaired by catechin flavonoids through fatty acid oxidation and mitochondria function-associated gene expression [40]. Thus, the possible molecular mechanisms of MCE-mediated ammonia metabolism may be explained by the regulation of mitochondria respiration.During muscle contraction, a large amount of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is consumed, producing adenosine diphosphate [41]. Uric acid generally regenerates adenosine monophosphate into ATP through oxidative phosphorylation of purine nucleotides [41]. However, when ATP usage is high and there is a lack of oxygen for deoxidation to produce ATP, xanthine accumulates and is converted into uric acid by xanthine oxidase [42]. Since there is no urate oxidase in the human body, in order to maintain a state of equilibrium, around 700 mg of uric acid per day is excreted through the intestines and kidneys, and when this is insufficient, fatigue builds. In addition, uric acid exists in the form of sodium urate, and when the saturation limit (7.0 mg/dL) is exceeded, uric acid crystals form, causing inflammation [43]. Exercise increases uric acid levels via catabolism of purine nucleotides. According to previous research on changes in uric acid levels during exercise, the intensity is more important than exercise duration in increasing blood uric acid levels, and recovery from high uric acid levels can be optimized by consuming antioxidants, which remove free radicals [4, 43]. However, in the result of our study, there were no significant effects of MCE supplementation. Instead, our results suggest that ammonia, not uric acid, contributes to MCE-mediated antifatigue effects in the peripheral system.Central fatigue is perceived in the CNS, resulting from changes in the levels of neurotransmitters, such as serotonin, dopamine, and prolactin [19, 44]. Central fatigue is associated with the difficulty in continuing exercise due to a psychological loss of motivation, loss of appetite, sleepiness, or impairment of psychological alertness, temperature control, anxiety, lethargy, or depression [45]. In a high-temperature environment, despite sufficient energy sources, high-intensity or long-duration exercises cause an increase in body temperature, which may lead to changes in the CNS, ultimately resulting in central fatigue [27, 45, 46]. One of these changes involves serotonin, which increases in the body and the brain during exercise, causing muscle fatigue and impairing muscle contraction [47]. The increase in serotonin during sustained exercise occurs as lipids are broken down and converted to free fatty acids for use as an energy source [45]. This increases the concentration of free tryptophan in the blood, which crosses the blood-brain barrier and is used to synthesize serotonin, which contributes to central fatigue during exercise [37]. According to previous studies on the relationship between serotonin and aerobic capacity in a human study, pharmacological treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors decreased physical performance in a time to reach exhaustion cycling trial, suggesting that activity of the serotonergic system in the brain could modulate fatigue during prolonged exercise [48]. In this study, we found that serotonin levels were reduced by MCE supplementation during exercise. This result suggests that MCE supplementation, which prevents serotonin secretion, may enhance aerobic performance with training.Serotonin, dopamine, and prolactin have been reported to stimulate and inhibit each other in the brain [49]. In fact, there is a decrease in dopamine when serotonin synthesis and secretion increase [50]. In a fatiguing exercise rat model, decreased serotonin and increased dopamine levels in the brain were observed during prolonged exercise [51]. Dopamine levels decreased in the training phase compared to those in the preparation phase and increased again at rest [52]. The results of this study are consistent with those of previous studies that report an inverse relationship between serotonin and dopamine, which implies that MCE supplementation helps to maintain a balance of vital neurotransmitters for fatigue relief to promote the training effectiveness. In addition to examining the validity of using serotonin and dopamine as indicators of fatigue in high-intensity training, serotonin levels increased more in the training phase than in the preparation phase and remained high during rest [49]. These results demonstrate that serotonin and dopamine are suitable indicators for evaluating the central fatigue that is often associated with mood alterations including depression and anxiety [45, 53]. A systemic in vivo study using specific antagonist compounds tried to elucidate the mechanism of the antidepressant- and anxiolytic-like effects of MCE via interaction with dopaminergic (D2 receptor) and serotonergic (5-HT2 receptor) mechanisms [54]. Although it remains unclear what physiological mechanisms are responsible for MCE-rescued central fatigue, a plausible candidate may be the MCE-mediated release of neuromodulators including dopamine and serotonin.Another change seen in central fatigue is in prolactin levels. Prolactin is secreted from the anterior pituitary gland and is increased throughout the body during exercise in a high-temperature environment [55]. Prolactin levels increase in proportion to an increase in body temperature, and prolactin secretion is stimulated by serotonin and inhibited by dopamine [56]. This is also supported by a previous study reporting that prolactin is activated by serotonin secretion [57]. Among the changes in central fatigue symptoms after MCE supplementation, the fact that serotonin levels decreased indicates that MCE may be effective in helping the body sustain exercise. Since increased serotonin levels are the result of an increase in body temperature, it is thought that MCE helped to reduce and maintain body temperature. In addition, dopamine is involved in the inhibition of prolactin [58], and the reduction in prolactin levels following MCE use appears to occur due to increased dopamine levels. It is known that central fatigue during exercise is a complex phenomenon caused by the various neurotransmitters [59], and the interaction between dopamine and serotonin may play an important role in exercise-induced central fatigue [60]. These MCE-induced antifatigue effects may be caused by hormonal balancing among dopamine, serotonin, and prolactin in the central nervous system. Furthermore, our study demonstrates that there is a varying degree of interaction between MCE use and fatigue indicators, suggesting that MCE could inhibit symptoms of central fatigue and thus enable sustained exercise.There are limitations to this study that should be considered. First, it is difficult to generalize the results because of the small sample size. In fact, the present study is a pilot trial and addresses feasibility issues, such as sample size, resources, and scientific aspects, prior to a future definitive trial to explore the effects of MCE. In addition, in order to confirm the effect of MCE, the subjects were controlled by residence at a camp and nutritional intake analysis to confirm the temporal change of fatigue substances. However, there was a limitation because a control group or placebo group could not be established. Nevertheless, we were able to establish preliminary evidence for the efficacy of MCE as a supplement for high-intensity athletes.


## 5. Conclusions

This pilot study shows that MCE has a positive effect on several peripheral and central fatigue parameters in athletes performing high-intensity, long-duration summer training in a high-temperature environment. In the future, it will be necessary to perform research on the antioxidant activity of MCE, changes in heat and stress-related hormones, and changes in immune function-related hormones, which could explain more clearly the changes observed in fatigue parameters following MCE supplementation. Furthermore, we anticipate research related to MCE’s functional role in cognitive abilities that is crucial for high exercise performance.



---

*Source: 4768390-2020-06-08.xml*