# Effect of Conductivity of the Aqueous Solution on the Size of Printable Nanoparticle

Authors: Mi-Hyun Oh; Nam-Soo Kim; Sun-Mee Kang
Journal: Journal of Nanotechnology
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

Direct writing technology using nano/microsize particles in aqueous solution is currently one of the leading candidates to bring a substantial advancement to the technical arena. However, little is known about an effect of conductivity of the solution including metal ions on nanoparticle size for the direct writing technology. It is believed that conductivity of solution can influence the size of particles in reducing environmental of aqueous solutions. In this study parameters which affect electric conductivity in solution were characterized by changing concentration of copper ion, concentration of surfactants, and anion of metal compounds. The mobility of ion in aqueous media with respect to copper ion concentration was the most pronounced factor to control the size of created copper nanometals in water. However, due to the high reactivity on large surface area, the nanocopper metal was oxidized in water. The electric conductivity varied in the range of 7 to 360 mS/cm when Cu(NO3)2·3H2O dissolved in water from 0.03–3.0 mol/dm3. In this condition, the size of nano particles can vary from 10 to 500 nm. Various concentrations of surfactants and two anion Cu compounds used to vary the conductivity of the solution to verify the effect of electric conductivity of solution on the particle size. Decreasing the conductivity had a corresponding effect on the particle size. The electric conductivity was decreased from 67 to 56 mS/cm by adding surfactant from 0.1 to 0.5 mol/dm3 consequently, the particle sizes were decreased from 89 to 21 nm. Copper nitrate and copper chloride were used to verify the anion effect on electrical conductivity and particle sizes. This effect was not dependent on the kind of ions chosen to change the conductivity. However, when Cu(NO3)2·3H2O was used, the size of the particles was 89 nm, while it was 91 nm when CuCl2·2H2O was used.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The characteristics of particles change as the particle size decreases to nanosize. This change can be important if it is used to improve product characteristics and can be applied in numerous areas. The nanoparticles have been adapted to produce printable devices, flexible antennae, display, and circuit board in industries. To improve conductivity and increase the contact area, various shapes such as octahedral Au nanoparticle [1], and Ag cubic [2] were made in condensed surfactant phase. The spherical, cylindrical, and web-shaped Cu and CuO were successfully synthesized by altering concentration of surfactants and pH of solutions in alcoholic media [3].Additional tests were conducted using various surfactants to control particle size in the aqueous media. The concentration of the surfactants, bis (2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate was used [4, 5], and PEG-400 were varied to determine the relationship of surfactant concentration with particle size. Because of PEG-400 and Au nano particle linkage, the particles cannot grow [6]. But except surfactant, chemical reaction time was the parameter to determine particle size [7].Computer modelling was also used to determine which combination contributes to fine particle distribution and kinetics of nano particle formation [8], and Monte Carlo method was applied to predict final particle size [9]. Other attempt to improve nano particle characteristics is to change the medium from methanol to hexane to determine the relationship of particle size with carbon chain length [10] and in order to change the medium mixture of water, and methanol in varying ratios to verify the effect on particle size [11]. However, the fundamental mechanism of nano particles formation by means of carbon chain length, water and methanol ratios of mixing has not been proved.The focus of this paper was to increase or decrease the conductivity by producing particles of various sizes in water. Reducing agent, concentration of metal ion, and so on were elements of changing conductivity [12]. In this paper, the conductivity was also changed by changing the concentration of ion, surfactant, and anions of copper compounds.


## 2. Experimental

Various sizes of copper nano particles were produced by varying the concentrations of copper ion and surfactants in solution. The concentration of surfactants is important in adjusting the size and amount of nano particles because surfactants hold copper ions as they are reduced. In this study in which Cu(NO3)2·3H2O and N2H4·H2O were held constant, and polyethylene glycol p-(1,1,3,3,-tetramethylbutyl)-phenyl ether(PGPPE) was changed from 0.1 to 0.5 mol/dm3.The method used is as follows: solutions of 100 mL 0.3 mol/dm3 Cu(NO3)2·3H2O and 100 mL mixture of 0.1 mol/dm3 to 0.5 mol/dm3 PGPPE were prepared. These were mixed in solution and stirred at 300 rpm and 25°C. After mixing, 1 mL of 1.5 mol/dm3 N2H4·H2O was slowly added. The mixture was stirred until a constant color and temperature were maintained. This was followed by centrifugation at 6000 rpm for 30 min. The conductivity of supernatants and the size of particles were then measured by particle-sized analyser and TEM. PGPPE changed the conductivity with a long carbon change but also with pH.Table1 shows the concentrations of various species used for the next set of experiments. In these experiments a 100 mL of 0.03 mol/dm3, 0.15 mol/dm3, 0.3 mol/dm3, 1.5 mol/dm3, and 3.0 mol/dm3 Cu(NO3)2·3H2O was mixed with 100 mL 0.1 mol/dm3 PGPPE. It was stirred at 300 rpm and 25°C. One mL of the corresponding amount of N2H4·H2O was then added. Each solution was then put in a centrifuge at 6000 rpm for 30 min. The electric conductivity of solution with nano particles was measured while stirring at 300 rpm by determining the resistance of the solution between platinum metal electrodes in cylindrical and arranged concentrically.Table 1
Concentration of elements each solution with varying copper ion (unit: mol/dm3).
PGPPECu(NO3)2·3H2ON2H4·H2O0.10.030.150.10.150.750.10.301.500.11.507.500.13.0015.00A test was conducted to compare the effect of using either Cu(NO3)2·3H2O or CuCl2·2H2O to control the conductivity. A solution of 100 mL of 0.3 mol/dm3 Cu(NO3)2·3H2O, 100 mL of 0.1 mol/dm3 PEGPPE, and 60 mL of 1.5 mol/dm3 hydrazine was made.


## 3. Results and Discussion

Figure1 shows that the concentration of ion is a responsible factor for increasing the conductivity of the solution. As the concentration of ion increases, the size of particles also increases. This is possible because when the surfactant concentration is low, the particle growth improves. When ion concentration is high, the nucleation rate and the possibility of particle growing by collision of ions and primary particle are high. The results shown in Figure 1 indicate that there is a strong relationship between the particle size and the electric conductivity of aqueous solution. When the conductivity was increased in the wide range, the particle size also increased at the high concentration of solution. The mobility of ion in aqueous media with respect to copper ion concentration was the most pronounced factor to control the size of created copper nanometals in water. The electric conductivity varied in the range of 7 to 360 mS/cm when Cu(NO3)2·3H2O dissolved in water from 0.03–3.0 mol/dm3. In this condition, the size of nano particles was increased from 10.3 to 524.4 nm when copper ion was increased from 0.04 to 3.0 mol/dm3.Figure 1
Conductivity and particle diameter as a function of concentration of Cu(NO3)2·3H2O.Figure2 shows that conductivity of solution was not affected of PGPPE concentration when PGPPE varied from 0.1 to 0.5 mol/dm3 in the absent of copper ions in water. This would imply that the change of conductivity by only PFPPE is negligible, which was almost constant 0.01±0.003 mS/cm. It is noted that the effect of PGPPE itself was not pronounced factor to change particle size and conductivity of aqueous solution. When the conductivity of the solution decreased using surfactant in the present of copper ion, the conductivity of the aqueous solution decreased widely than when without copper ion.Figure 2
Conductivity as a function of surfactant concentration in the absent of copper ion.Figure3 shows that when PGPPE, which is a surfactant, increased from 0.1 mol/dm3 to 0.5 mol/dm3, the conductivity decreased from 67.8 mS/cm to 55.8 mS/cm. The decrease of conductivity, 12 mS/cm, in the present of copper ion as change of PFPPE is 3 order bigger than that without copper ion (0.006 mS/cm). PGPPE is used as a surfactant and becomes get tangled like a net in water and inhibits the mobility of ions. It is reported that decreasing conductivity was affected by not only the mobility of ions, but also by carbon chain length of surfactant. It was also found in this research that when the concentration of surfactant increased, the particle size decreased from 89 nm to 22 nm. These results are similar as that found with conductivity. There is strong evidence that the surfactant influences the size of the particles. As the concentration of the surfactant increases, the size of particles decreases resulting in poor conductivity. The surfactant interrupts the particle and ions as it is growing in size and shows that particle size is related to conductivity.Figure 3
Conductivity and particle diameter as a function of surfactant concentration at 0.3 mol/dm3 of  Cu(NO3)2·3H2O.It is noted that the concentration of copper nitrate increases, the conductivity of the solution will increase regardless of the size of the particles. When copper ion disappeared due to metal reduction, the effect of nitrate on the conductivity of solution did not supersede that of cupper ion [13].On the other hand, when the surfactant concentration was changed from 0.1 mol/dm3 to 0.5 mol/dm3, the conductivity of the solution changed from 67.8 mS/cm to 58.4 mS/cm, while the particle size decreased from 89 nm to 22 nm.Figure4 shows that the anion used to control the conductivity was not a factor in controlling the particle size. A test was conducted to compare the effect of using either Cu(NO3)2·3H2O or CuCl2·2H2O to control the conductivity. Cu(NO3)2·3H2O with PEGPPE was made with a resulting conductivity of 68 mS/cm. Using the same volume of CuCl2·2H2O instead of Cu(NO3)2·3H2O resulted in a conductivity of 49 mS/cm.Figure 4
Conductivity of the solution and the size of the particles produced for two different solutions when 0.3 mol/dm3 of Cu(NO3)2·3H2O and CuCl2·2H2O used, respectively.The resulting particle sizes of the solutions were 89 nm using Cu(NO3)2·3H2O and 91 nm using CuCl2·2H2O. This shows that changing the anion was not factor of particle size even though the conductivity was changed.Figure5 shows that when particles were made in water by changing Cu ions in the present of surfactant. The 20 nm sized particles were reduced and immediately oxidized. Due to the high reactivity on large surface area, the nanocopper metal was oxidized in water. In this study all the nanosized copper particles were found to oxidize in water.Figure 5
X-ray diffraction patterns of  particles when 0.5 mol/dm3 PGPPE with 0.3 mol/dm3 Cu(NO3)2·3H2O and  1.5 mol/dm3 was used.


## 4. Conclusion

This work showed that by varying the conductivity of the solution the particles size was able to be controlled. Decreasing the conductivity had a corresponding effect on the particle size. The mobility of ion in aqueous media with respect to copper ion concentration was the most pronounced factor to control the size of created copper nanometals.Various concentrations of surfactants and two anion Cu-compounds used to vary the conductivity of the solution to verify the effect of electric conductivity of solution on the particle size. Decreasing the conductivity had a corresponding effect on the particle size. The electric conductivity was decreased from 67 to 56 mS/cm by adding surfactant from 0.1 to 0.5 mol/dm3; consequently, the particle sizes were decreased from 89 to 21 nm. Copper nitrate and copper chloride were used to verity the anion effect on electrical conductivity and particle sizes. This effect was not dependent on the kind of ions chosen to change the conductivity.



---

*Source: 467812-2012-06-20.xml*