# Analysis on the Light-Scattering Effect in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell according to the TiO2 Structural Differences

Authors: Min-Kyu Son; Hyunwoong Seo; Soo-Kyoung Kim; Na-Yeong Hong; Byung-Man Kim; Songyi Park; Kandasamy Prabakar; Hee-Je Kim
Journal: International Journal of Photoenergy
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

A light-scattering layer is widely used in highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) because it improves the light-harvesting ability of a DSC by reflecting the light passing through the transparent TiO2 layer. Among many parameters affecting this light-scattering effect, the thickness of the TiO2 photoelectrode is also a significant parameter. However, most studies regarding the influence of the TiO2 photoelectrode thickness on the light-scattering effect have only focused on the thickness of the transparent TiO2 layer and have ignored the light-scattering layer thickness itself. Therefore, in this study, we analyzed the light scattering effect according to the thickness of the light-scattering layer and the resulting photovoltaic performance of the DSC. Finally, it was confirmed that the light-scattering effect is enhanced to some degree with the increase of the light-scattering layer thickness, while it is weakened when the light-scattering layer thickness is further increased.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) have attracted much attention as a promising alternative to conventional silicon solar cells due to their low cost, simple fabrication process, and their various applications to such things as flexible devices and building integrated photovoltaic systems [1–3]. Generally, a DSC is a photoelectrochemical solar cell made up of a dye-sensitized nanocrystalline TiO2 photo-electrode, a Pt deposited counter-electrode used for the catalyst of the iodide/triiodide (I−/I3-) redox system, and an electrolyte [4]. In this type of solar cell, the amount of light captured by the dye-sensitized TiO2 photoelectrode has a strong influence on the overall performance because the electrons are generated directly from the excited dye molecules by the irradiated sunlight [5, 6]. There have been many efforts to improve the performances by increasing the amount of light captured in the DSC such as developments in where the sensitizers have wider adsorption spectra [7–10], the introduction of a tandem structure [11–13], and the use of the light-scattering effect.Among these improvements, the light-scattering effect has drawn much attention since it is a simple method for enhancing the light absorption. The basic concept of light-scattering effect was introduced by Usami in 1997 [14]. He suggested a new photoelectrode structure, which uses an overlayer made up of a large particle semiconductor film on top of a layer made up of a small particle semiconductor film; the light scattered by the overlayer caused an increase in the light absorption. In early days, many studies have been focused on the evaluation of the light-scattering effect in the DSC by using various simulation methods based on the Mie theory [15], the Monte Carlo model [16], and the many-flux model [17]. Since then, the light-scattering effect has been widely used as an essential technique to improve the DSC performance. There are many structures and materials that have been used for the light-scattering effect: large particle TiO2 anatase [18–20], a TiO2 rutile-ZrO2 mixture [21], submicrometer-sized mesoporous TiO2 beads [22], hollow sphere TiO2 [23], light-scattering spherical voids [24], and mesoporous TiO2 with quasi-hexagonal and lamellar pore structures [25, 26]. Additionally, there are many commercial products used to accomplish the light-scattering effect, such as TiO2—anatase (Fluka), TiO2—rutile (Bayer), and TiO2—anatase (CCIC, Japan) [27].Figure1 shows the schematic structure of a conventional photoelectrode using the light-scattering effect. It consists of two layers: a transparent TiO2 layer (TL) using small particles and a light-scattering layer (LSL) using large particles. The light passing through the TL is then scattered by the LSL; this scattered light can then be reabsorbed by the dye molecules in the TL. The light-scattering ability depends on various parameters such as particle size, morphology of the LSL [19], and the thickness of TiO2 photoelectrode [16]. It is important to optimize these parameters in order to maximize the light-scattering effect, resulting in the improvement of the DSC performance. Therefore, many research groups have analyzed the influences that these parameters have on the DSC performance in order to determine the optimal conditions [18–21, 28–31]. As a result, it has been demonstrated that TiO2 with particle sizes between 100 nm and 400 nm is advantageous in strengthening the light-scattering effect. In addition, it has been concluded that the light-scattering effect is more effective as the thickness of the TL becomes thinner [21]. However, most studies regarding the influence of the TiO2 thickness on the light-scattering effect have only focused on the thickness of the TL (denoted as “x” in Figure 1) [18, 19, 21, 30, 31]. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no studies regarding the light-scattering effect according to the thickness of the LSL (denoted as “y” in the Figure 1), although it is related to the length of the optical path of the light.Figure 1
The schematic structure of a conventional photoelectrode using the light-scattering effect.Therefore, in this study, we report upon a study regarding the light-scattering effect according to the thickness of the LSL. We fabricated the TiO2 photoelectrodes, which have the TL at a fixed thickness and the LSL using various thicknesses, enabling us to investigate the effect of the thickness of the LSL on the photovoltaic performance of the DSC. To confirm this effect, the optical characteristics of the fabricated TiO2 photoelectrodes were analyzed and the performances of the fabricated DSCs were investigated.


## 2. Experiments

### 2.1. The Fabrication of the TiO2 Photoelectrode

Two kinds of commercial TiO2 paste were used to prepare the photoelectrode possessing the TL and the LSL. TiO2 paste A, containing small 10 nm particles (Ti-Nanoxide HT/SP, Solaronix, Switzerland) was used to fabricate the TL. And TiO2 paste B containing large 400 nm particles (PST-400C, CCIC, Japan) was used to fabricate the LSL. The fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO, 13 Ω/sq, Hartford Glass Co. Inc, USA) substrates were prepared by rinsing with acetone, ethanol, and distilled water in an ultrasonic bath in order to remove the contaminants. After that, paste A was deposited on the FTO substrate using the doctor blade method to fabricate the TL. A nanoporous TiO2 was implemented using the sintering process at 450°C for 30 min. Paste B was then deposited over the TL using the doctor blade method in order to add the LSL. The TiO2 photoelectrode was completed using additional sintering process at 450°C for 30 min. The thickness of the LSL was controlled by adding the number of the coating and the sintering processes.Figure2 shows the morphologies of the TL and the LSL measured using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, S-4200, Hitachi, Japan) operated at 15 kV. As shown in Figure 2, the transparent TiO2 film formed a uniform nanoporous structure, which is advantageous in attaching dye molecules. On the other hand, the LSL was composed of polyhedral submicron particles surrounded by nanoparticles. These submicron particles are sufficient to serve as light-scattering centers because their sizes are roughly 350~450 nm, which are suitable for the light-scattering effect. Table 1 shows the thicknesses of the TL and the LSL, which were measured using a surface profiler (ET 4000, Dong-Il Techno Co. Ltd, Korea). As illustrated in Table 1, the thickness of the TL was fixed at 8 ± 0.4 μm, whereas the thicknesses of the LSLs were as 5 ± 0.2 μm, 9 ± 0.3 μm, and 13 ± 0.3 μm. The increase of the thickness of the LSL was controlled at approximately 4 μm steps by adding one coating and one sintering process. Figure 3 illustrates cross-sectional FE-SEM images of prepared TiO2 films: (a) conventional, (b) LS1, (c) LS2, and (d) LS3. As shown Figure 3, the thickness of the TL was approximately 8.37 μm, while the thicknesses of the LSLs were as 4.88 μm, 9.07 μm, and 13.25 μm, respectively. These might well coincide with the thicknesses of the TL and LSL, which were measured using a surface profiler. It was also confirmed that the thickness of the LSL is increased by adding one coating and one sintering process and the TL and LSL are deposited uniformly without any structural damages.Table 1
The thickness of the TL and the LSL measured by the surface profiler.
Samples
Transparent TiO2layer (x, μm)
Light-scattering layer(y, μm)
Total thickness(μm)
Conventional(without light-scattering layer)
8 ± 0.4
—
8 ± 0.4
LS1 (one doctor blade + one sintering)
8 ± 0.4
5 ± 0.2
13 ± 0.6
LS2 (two doctor blade + two sintering)
8 ± 0.4
9 ± 0.3
17 ± 0.7
LS3(three doctor blade + three sintering)
8 ± 0.4
13 ± 0.3
21 ± 0.7The morphologies of (a) the TL (Ti-Nanoxide HT/SP) and (b) the LSL (PST-400C) measured by the FE-SEM.
(a)
(b)Cross-sectional FE-SEM images of prepared TiO2 films: (a) conventional, (b) LS1, (c) LS2, and (d) LS3.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The fabricated photoelectrodes were soaked in a 0.2 mM N719 dye (cis-bis (isothiocyanato) bis (2,2′-bipyridyl-4,4′-discarboxylato)—ruthenium(II)—bis tertabutyl—ammonium, RuC58H86N8O8S2) solution for 24 h at room temperature in order to attach the dye molecules to the TiO2 nanostructure. The dye-adsorbed photoelectrodes were then taken out and rinsed in 99.9% ethanol (C2H5OH) in order to remove the excess dye molecules.


### 2.2. The Fabrication of Counter Electrode and the DSC Assembly

The predrilled FTO substrates for the counter electrode were rinsed using same processes as the case of the photoelectrode. In order to fabricate the Pt catalytic layer for the redox process on the counter electrode, a commercial Pt paste (Platisol T/SP, Solaronix, Switzerland) containing a chemical Pt precursor was deposited onto the cleaned substrate using the doctor blade method. The platinized counter electrodes were then sintered at 450°C for 10 min. The fabricated photo- and counter electrodes were sealed using a 60μm thermoplast hot-melt sealing sheet (SX 1170-60, Solaronix, Switzerland). The DSC was completed by injecting a redox electrolyte consisting of 0.5 M LiI, 0.05 M I2 and 0.5 M 4-tertbutylpyridine in acetonitrile through the predrilled holes in the counter electrode.


### 2.3. Characterization

In order to analyze the light-scattering effect according to the thickness of the LSL, the reflectance and transmittance spectra of the dye-adsorbed LSLs with different thicknesses were measured by using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Cary 300, Varian Inc., USA) equipped with the diffuse reflectance accessory at the wavelengths ranging from 400 nm to 800 nm. In addition, the amounts of dye-loading to each TiO2 photoelectrode were compared through a dye-desorption experiment to ascertain the changes in the amount of dye-loading in regards to the increase of the LSL thickness. It was calculated after the dye molecules were detached from the TiO2 photoelectrode in a 10 mM NaOH aqueous solution.The photovoltaic performances of the DSCs according to the thickness variations of the LSL were measured under 1 sun illumination (air mass 1.5, 100 mW/cm2) using a source meter (Model 2400, Keithly Instrument Inc., USA). The active area of the DSC was 0.25 cm2 and the I-V characteristics were determined using the open circuit voltage (VOC), the current density (JSC), the fill factor (FF) and the conversion efficiency (η). The incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) was measured as a function of wavelength from 400 nm to 800 nm under monochromatic irradiation, emitted from a Xe-lamp (MAX-302, Asahi Spectra Co. Ltd, Japan) in order to determine the DSC performance. Open-circuit photovoltage decays (OCVD) experiments were conducted in order to determine how the electron transport and recombination were affected by the LSL thickness. In this experiment, light was irradiated onto the DSC until the VOC was steady, and then, the irradiation was halted. The applied voltage decay was recorded using a potentiostat/galvanostat (SP-50, BioLogic Science Instruments, France) from the full darkness point.


## 2.1. The Fabrication of the TiO2 Photoelectrode

Two kinds of commercial TiO2 paste were used to prepare the photoelectrode possessing the TL and the LSL. TiO2 paste A, containing small 10 nm particles (Ti-Nanoxide HT/SP, Solaronix, Switzerland) was used to fabricate the TL. And TiO2 paste B containing large 400 nm particles (PST-400C, CCIC, Japan) was used to fabricate the LSL. The fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO, 13 Ω/sq, Hartford Glass Co. Inc, USA) substrates were prepared by rinsing with acetone, ethanol, and distilled water in an ultrasonic bath in order to remove the contaminants. After that, paste A was deposited on the FTO substrate using the doctor blade method to fabricate the TL. A nanoporous TiO2 was implemented using the sintering process at 450°C for 30 min. Paste B was then deposited over the TL using the doctor blade method in order to add the LSL. The TiO2 photoelectrode was completed using additional sintering process at 450°C for 30 min. The thickness of the LSL was controlled by adding the number of the coating and the sintering processes.Figure2 shows the morphologies of the TL and the LSL measured using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, S-4200, Hitachi, Japan) operated at 15 kV. As shown in Figure 2, the transparent TiO2 film formed a uniform nanoporous structure, which is advantageous in attaching dye molecules. On the other hand, the LSL was composed of polyhedral submicron particles surrounded by nanoparticles. These submicron particles are sufficient to serve as light-scattering centers because their sizes are roughly 350~450 nm, which are suitable for the light-scattering effect. Table 1 shows the thicknesses of the TL and the LSL, which were measured using a surface profiler (ET 4000, Dong-Il Techno Co. Ltd, Korea). As illustrated in Table 1, the thickness of the TL was fixed at 8 ± 0.4 μm, whereas the thicknesses of the LSLs were as 5 ± 0.2 μm, 9 ± 0.3 μm, and 13 ± 0.3 μm. The increase of the thickness of the LSL was controlled at approximately 4 μm steps by adding one coating and one sintering process. Figure 3 illustrates cross-sectional FE-SEM images of prepared TiO2 films: (a) conventional, (b) LS1, (c) LS2, and (d) LS3. As shown Figure 3, the thickness of the TL was approximately 8.37 μm, while the thicknesses of the LSLs were as 4.88 μm, 9.07 μm, and 13.25 μm, respectively. These might well coincide with the thicknesses of the TL and LSL, which were measured using a surface profiler. It was also confirmed that the thickness of the LSL is increased by adding one coating and one sintering process and the TL and LSL are deposited uniformly without any structural damages.Table 1
The thickness of the TL and the LSL measured by the surface profiler.
Samples
Transparent TiO2layer (x, μm)
Light-scattering layer(y, μm)
Total thickness(μm)
Conventional(without light-scattering layer)
8 ± 0.4
—
8 ± 0.4
LS1 (one doctor blade + one sintering)
8 ± 0.4
5 ± 0.2
13 ± 0.6
LS2 (two doctor blade + two sintering)
8 ± 0.4
9 ± 0.3
17 ± 0.7
LS3(three doctor blade + three sintering)
8 ± 0.4
13 ± 0.3
21 ± 0.7The morphologies of (a) the TL (Ti-Nanoxide HT/SP) and (b) the LSL (PST-400C) measured by the FE-SEM.
(a)
(b)Cross-sectional FE-SEM images of prepared TiO2 films: (a) conventional, (b) LS1, (c) LS2, and (d) LS3.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The fabricated photoelectrodes were soaked in a 0.2 mM N719 dye (cis-bis (isothiocyanato) bis (2,2′-bipyridyl-4,4′-discarboxylato)—ruthenium(II)—bis tertabutyl—ammonium, RuC58H86N8O8S2) solution for 24 h at room temperature in order to attach the dye molecules to the TiO2 nanostructure. The dye-adsorbed photoelectrodes were then taken out and rinsed in 99.9% ethanol (C2H5OH) in order to remove the excess dye molecules.


## 2.2. The Fabrication of Counter Electrode and the DSC Assembly

The predrilled FTO substrates for the counter electrode were rinsed using same processes as the case of the photoelectrode. In order to fabricate the Pt catalytic layer for the redox process on the counter electrode, a commercial Pt paste (Platisol T/SP, Solaronix, Switzerland) containing a chemical Pt precursor was deposited onto the cleaned substrate using the doctor blade method. The platinized counter electrodes were then sintered at 450°C for 10 min. The fabricated photo- and counter electrodes were sealed using a 60μm thermoplast hot-melt sealing sheet (SX 1170-60, Solaronix, Switzerland). The DSC was completed by injecting a redox electrolyte consisting of 0.5 M LiI, 0.05 M I2 and 0.5 M 4-tertbutylpyridine in acetonitrile through the predrilled holes in the counter electrode.


## 2.3. Characterization

In order to analyze the light-scattering effect according to the thickness of the LSL, the reflectance and transmittance spectra of the dye-adsorbed LSLs with different thicknesses were measured by using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Cary 300, Varian Inc., USA) equipped with the diffuse reflectance accessory at the wavelengths ranging from 400 nm to 800 nm. In addition, the amounts of dye-loading to each TiO2 photoelectrode were compared through a dye-desorption experiment to ascertain the changes in the amount of dye-loading in regards to the increase of the LSL thickness. It was calculated after the dye molecules were detached from the TiO2 photoelectrode in a 10 mM NaOH aqueous solution.The photovoltaic performances of the DSCs according to the thickness variations of the LSL were measured under 1 sun illumination (air mass 1.5, 100 mW/cm2) using a source meter (Model 2400, Keithly Instrument Inc., USA). The active area of the DSC was 0.25 cm2 and the I-V characteristics were determined using the open circuit voltage (VOC), the current density (JSC), the fill factor (FF) and the conversion efficiency (η). The incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) was measured as a function of wavelength from 400 nm to 800 nm under monochromatic irradiation, emitted from a Xe-lamp (MAX-302, Asahi Spectra Co. Ltd, Japan) in order to determine the DSC performance. Open-circuit photovoltage decays (OCVD) experiments were conducted in order to determine how the electron transport and recombination were affected by the LSL thickness. In this experiment, light was irradiated onto the DSC until the VOC was steady, and then, the irradiation was halted. The applied voltage decay was recorded using a potentiostat/galvanostat (SP-50, BioLogic Science Instruments, France) from the full darkness point.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. The Light-Scattering Effect according to the LSL Thickness

Figure4 shows the reflectance spectra of the dye-adsorbed LSL on the TL according to the thicknesses. As shown in Figure 4, the reflectance is drastically increased at wavelengths above 550 nm. This means that the light-scattering effect is improved by introducing the LSL on the TL. The reflectance is similar at wavelengths ranging between 550 nm and 600 nm, irrespective of the variation of LSL thickness. On the other hand, the reflectance increases along with the increase of the LSL thickness from 5 ± 0.2 μm to 9 ± 0.3 μm at wavelengths above 600 nm. This indicates that more irradiated light to the LSL is reflected by further thicker LSL. Figure 5 illustrates the transmittance spectra of the dye-adsorbed LSL on the TL according to the thickness. The transmittance is slightly decreased by increasing the LSL thickness from 5 ± 0.2 μm to 9 ± 0.3 μm in the region above 600 nm, while it is also similar in the region until 600 nm. However, the reflectance and transmittance are almost not changed by the LSL thickness, when LSL thickness is increased from 9 ± 0.3 μm to 13 ± 0.3 μm.Figure 4
The reflectance spectra of the dye-adsorbed LSL on the TL according to the LSL thicknesses.Figure 5
The transmittance spectra of the dye-adsorbed LSL on the TL according to the LSL thicknesses.Figure6 represents the sum of the reflectance and transmittance of dye-adsorbed LSL on the TL according to the thicknesses, obtained from the Figures 4 and 5. The tendency of spectra is very similar to the reflectance, because the transmittance is slightly changed, compared to the reflectance. The sum of the reflectance and transmittance is similar at the wavelengths between 400 nm and 680 nm, while it is increased in the region above 680 nm by increasing the LSL thickness from 5 ± 0.2 μm to 9 ± 0.3 μm. On the other hand, it is not increased in the region above 680 nm along with the increase of the LSL thickness from 9 ± 0.3 μm to 13 ± 0.3 μm. From these results, it is confirmed that the variation of the LSL thickness affects the light-scattering effect in the long wavelength region above 680 nm. The light-scattering effect is improved by increasing the LSL thickness until 9 ± 0.3 μm, because the further thicker LSL provides more chance to scatter the light. However, the further thick LSL above 9 ± 0.3 μm is not significant to improve the light-scattering effect, because it is estimated that the light-scattering mostly occurs at the front part in the LSL. Therefore, the light-scattering effect is improved along with increase of the LSL thickness to around 9 μm, while it is saturated above the LSL thickness of approximately 9 μm.Figure 6
The sum of the reflectance and transmittance of dye-adsorbed LSL on the TL according to the thicknesses.


### 3.2. The Performance of the DSC according to the LSL Thickness

Table2 shows the performances and the dye-loading amounts of the DSCs in regards to the changes in the LSL thicknesses. As illustrated in Table 2, the conversion efficiency of the DSC is improved, as a result the increase in JSC when the thickness of the LSL increases to the thickness of approximately 9 μm. This is caused by the enhancement of the light-scattering effect with the increase of the thickness of the LSL. An additional factor is the increase of the dye-loading with the increase in the thickness of the LSL, as shown in Table 2. It is caused by the TiO2 nanoparticles surrounding to the polyhedral shaped-light-scattering centers in the LSL, which is advantageous to attach more dye molecules to the TiO2 photo-electrode (Figure 2(b)).Table 2
The performances and the dye-loading amounts in the DSCs with the changes in the thickness of the LSLs.
Samples
V
O
C (V)
J
S
C (mA/cm2)
FF
η (%)
Amount of dye loading (mol/cm2)
Conventional
0.773
9.677
0.70
5.24
2.011 × 10−5
LS1
0.769
14.545
0.61
6.82
2.369 × 10−5
LS2
0.763
17.533
0.61
8.16
2.454 × 10−5
LS3
0.757
15.966
0.62
7.49
2.744 × 10−5However, the efficiency decreases when the thickness of the LSL is 13 ± 0.3μm, even though the light-scattering effect is the same as that for the thickness of 9 ± 0.3 μm and the dye-loading is increased. It is thought that this is caused by the electron recombination, resulting from the increase of the thickness of the TiO2 photoelectrode along with the increase in the thickness of the LSL. Generally, the VOC is related to the electron recombination in the DSC; it decreases when the electron recombination loss is strengthened at the TiO2/electrolyte interface [27]. The VOC decreases when the thickness of the LSL increases (Table 2). This means that the electron recombination becomes more active with an increase in the thickness of the TiO2 photoelectrode. This is clearly proved by the OCVD experiment. Figure 7 shows the decays of the VOC depending on the thickness of the LSL. In the OCVD experiment, the response time is determined by the reciprocal of the derivative of the decay curve normalized by the VOC, expressed as
(1)τ=-(kBTe)·(dVOCdt)-1,
where kB is the Boltzmann’s constant, T is the temperature, and e is the elementary charge. The response time (τ) is equal to the electron lifetime, which is related to the recombination process [32–34]. From this equation, it is known that rapid decay of the VOC means the short electron lifetime. And it indicates that the electron recombination is more active at the TiO2/electrolyte interface. As shown in Figure 6, the VOC decay speed increases, as the thickness of the LSL increases. The electron recombination becomes active according to the increase in the LSL thickness, because the increase in the thickness of the LSL provides more opportunities for electrons to recombine with the electrolyte during the electron transport process. And it is also caused by the hindrance of the electrolyte diffusion due to the increase of the LSL thickness. The hindered electrolyte diffusion provides insufficient charge carriers, resulting in more electron recombination. In addition to the decrease of the VOC, this also verifies the enhancement of the electron recombination with the enlargement of the TiO2 photoelectrode thickness, resulting from the increase of the thickness of the LSL.Figure 7
TheVOC decay according to the thickness of the LSL.Figure8 shows the IPCE spectra of a conventional DSC without an LSL and the DSCs with the different LSLs thicknesses. The IPCE is determined by
(2)IPCE(λ)=LHE(λ)Φe-inj(λ)ηCC(λ),
where LHE(λ) is the light-harvesting efficiency, Φe-inj (λ) is the electron injection yield from the dye excited state into the TiO2, and ηCC(λ) is the charge collection efficiency at the transparent conductive oxide electrodes [35]. As illustrated in Figure 8, the IPCE of the DSCs with the LSLs is higher than that of the conventional DSC and it is improved, as the thickness of the LSL increased. This is mainly caused by the improvement in the light-harvesting efficiency, resulting from the enhanced light-scattering effect and the increase in the dye-loading. The IPCE is improved by the increase of the dye-loading with the increase in the thickness of the LSL at the wavelengths between 400 nm and 600 nm. The improvement of the IPCE at the wavelengths between 600 nm and 700 nm is caused not only by the increase in the dye loading but also by the enhancement of the light-scattering effect. At the wavelengths above 700 nm, the enhancement of the light-scattering effect with the increase of the thickness of the LSL is the dominant factor that influences the improvement of the IPCE. However, in the case of the LS3, the IPCE decreases irrespective of the increase in the LSL thickness. This is caused by the decrease of the charge collection efficiency, resulting from the greater electron recombination in accordance with the increase in the thickness of the LSL.Figure 8
The IPCE spectra of the conventional DSC without the LSL and the DSCs with the different thickness LSLs.In summary, the light-scattering effect is improved when the thickness of the LSL is increased, but saturates at thicknesses above 9 ± 0.3μm. The increase in the thickness of the LSL assists the attachment of more dye molecules, but is disadvantageous in the transport of electrons in the DSC due to increased electron recombination. Consequently, it is confirmed that the increase of the LSL thickness to some degree is beneficial to improve the light-scattering effect at long wavelength region, while the further thick LSL is not significant to improve the light-scattering effect. On the contrary, the further thick LSL causes the decreased performance of the DSC by inducing more electron recombination.


## 3.1. The Light-Scattering Effect according to the LSL Thickness

Figure4 shows the reflectance spectra of the dye-adsorbed LSL on the TL according to the thicknesses. As shown in Figure 4, the reflectance is drastically increased at wavelengths above 550 nm. This means that the light-scattering effect is improved by introducing the LSL on the TL. The reflectance is similar at wavelengths ranging between 550 nm and 600 nm, irrespective of the variation of LSL thickness. On the other hand, the reflectance increases along with the increase of the LSL thickness from 5 ± 0.2 μm to 9 ± 0.3 μm at wavelengths above 600 nm. This indicates that more irradiated light to the LSL is reflected by further thicker LSL. Figure 5 illustrates the transmittance spectra of the dye-adsorbed LSL on the TL according to the thickness. The transmittance is slightly decreased by increasing the LSL thickness from 5 ± 0.2 μm to 9 ± 0.3 μm in the region above 600 nm, while it is also similar in the region until 600 nm. However, the reflectance and transmittance are almost not changed by the LSL thickness, when LSL thickness is increased from 9 ± 0.3 μm to 13 ± 0.3 μm.Figure 4
The reflectance spectra of the dye-adsorbed LSL on the TL according to the LSL thicknesses.Figure 5
The transmittance spectra of the dye-adsorbed LSL on the TL according to the LSL thicknesses.Figure6 represents the sum of the reflectance and transmittance of dye-adsorbed LSL on the TL according to the thicknesses, obtained from the Figures 4 and 5. The tendency of spectra is very similar to the reflectance, because the transmittance is slightly changed, compared to the reflectance. The sum of the reflectance and transmittance is similar at the wavelengths between 400 nm and 680 nm, while it is increased in the region above 680 nm by increasing the LSL thickness from 5 ± 0.2 μm to 9 ± 0.3 μm. On the other hand, it is not increased in the region above 680 nm along with the increase of the LSL thickness from 9 ± 0.3 μm to 13 ± 0.3 μm. From these results, it is confirmed that the variation of the LSL thickness affects the light-scattering effect in the long wavelength region above 680 nm. The light-scattering effect is improved by increasing the LSL thickness until 9 ± 0.3 μm, because the further thicker LSL provides more chance to scatter the light. However, the further thick LSL above 9 ± 0.3 μm is not significant to improve the light-scattering effect, because it is estimated that the light-scattering mostly occurs at the front part in the LSL. Therefore, the light-scattering effect is improved along with increase of the LSL thickness to around 9 μm, while it is saturated above the LSL thickness of approximately 9 μm.Figure 6
The sum of the reflectance and transmittance of dye-adsorbed LSL on the TL according to the thicknesses.


## 3.2. The Performance of the DSC according to the LSL Thickness

Table2 shows the performances and the dye-loading amounts of the DSCs in regards to the changes in the LSL thicknesses. As illustrated in Table 2, the conversion efficiency of the DSC is improved, as a result the increase in JSC when the thickness of the LSL increases to the thickness of approximately 9 μm. This is caused by the enhancement of the light-scattering effect with the increase of the thickness of the LSL. An additional factor is the increase of the dye-loading with the increase in the thickness of the LSL, as shown in Table 2. It is caused by the TiO2 nanoparticles surrounding to the polyhedral shaped-light-scattering centers in the LSL, which is advantageous to attach more dye molecules to the TiO2 photo-electrode (Figure 2(b)).Table 2
The performances and the dye-loading amounts in the DSCs with the changes in the thickness of the LSLs.
Samples
V
O
C (V)
J
S
C (mA/cm2)
FF
η (%)
Amount of dye loading (mol/cm2)
Conventional
0.773
9.677
0.70
5.24
2.011 × 10−5
LS1
0.769
14.545
0.61
6.82
2.369 × 10−5
LS2
0.763
17.533
0.61
8.16
2.454 × 10−5
LS3
0.757
15.966
0.62
7.49
2.744 × 10−5However, the efficiency decreases when the thickness of the LSL is 13 ± 0.3μm, even though the light-scattering effect is the same as that for the thickness of 9 ± 0.3 μm and the dye-loading is increased. It is thought that this is caused by the electron recombination, resulting from the increase of the thickness of the TiO2 photoelectrode along with the increase in the thickness of the LSL. Generally, the VOC is related to the electron recombination in the DSC; it decreases when the electron recombination loss is strengthened at the TiO2/electrolyte interface [27]. The VOC decreases when the thickness of the LSL increases (Table 2). This means that the electron recombination becomes more active with an increase in the thickness of the TiO2 photoelectrode. This is clearly proved by the OCVD experiment. Figure 7 shows the decays of the VOC depending on the thickness of the LSL. In the OCVD experiment, the response time is determined by the reciprocal of the derivative of the decay curve normalized by the VOC, expressed as
(1)τ=-(kBTe)·(dVOCdt)-1,
where kB is the Boltzmann’s constant, T is the temperature, and e is the elementary charge. The response time (τ) is equal to the electron lifetime, which is related to the recombination process [32–34]. From this equation, it is known that rapid decay of the VOC means the short electron lifetime. And it indicates that the electron recombination is more active at the TiO2/electrolyte interface. As shown in Figure 6, the VOC decay speed increases, as the thickness of the LSL increases. The electron recombination becomes active according to the increase in the LSL thickness, because the increase in the thickness of the LSL provides more opportunities for electrons to recombine with the electrolyte during the electron transport process. And it is also caused by the hindrance of the electrolyte diffusion due to the increase of the LSL thickness. The hindered electrolyte diffusion provides insufficient charge carriers, resulting in more electron recombination. In addition to the decrease of the VOC, this also verifies the enhancement of the electron recombination with the enlargement of the TiO2 photoelectrode thickness, resulting from the increase of the thickness of the LSL.Figure 7
TheVOC decay according to the thickness of the LSL.Figure8 shows the IPCE spectra of a conventional DSC without an LSL and the DSCs with the different LSLs thicknesses. The IPCE is determined by
(2)IPCE(λ)=LHE(λ)Φe-inj(λ)ηCC(λ),
where LHE(λ) is the light-harvesting efficiency, Φe-inj (λ) is the electron injection yield from the dye excited state into the TiO2, and ηCC(λ) is the charge collection efficiency at the transparent conductive oxide electrodes [35]. As illustrated in Figure 8, the IPCE of the DSCs with the LSLs is higher than that of the conventional DSC and it is improved, as the thickness of the LSL increased. This is mainly caused by the improvement in the light-harvesting efficiency, resulting from the enhanced light-scattering effect and the increase in the dye-loading. The IPCE is improved by the increase of the dye-loading with the increase in the thickness of the LSL at the wavelengths between 400 nm and 600 nm. The improvement of the IPCE at the wavelengths between 600 nm and 700 nm is caused not only by the increase in the dye loading but also by the enhancement of the light-scattering effect. At the wavelengths above 700 nm, the enhancement of the light-scattering effect with the increase of the thickness of the LSL is the dominant factor that influences the improvement of the IPCE. However, in the case of the LS3, the IPCE decreases irrespective of the increase in the LSL thickness. This is caused by the decrease of the charge collection efficiency, resulting from the greater electron recombination in accordance with the increase in the thickness of the LSL.Figure 8
The IPCE spectra of the conventional DSC without the LSL and the DSCs with the different thickness LSLs.In summary, the light-scattering effect is improved when the thickness of the LSL is increased, but saturates at thicknesses above 9 ± 0.3μm. The increase in the thickness of the LSL assists the attachment of more dye molecules, but is disadvantageous in the transport of electrons in the DSC due to increased electron recombination. Consequently, it is confirmed that the increase of the LSL thickness to some degree is beneficial to improve the light-scattering effect at long wavelength region, while the further thick LSL is not significant to improve the light-scattering effect. On the contrary, the further thick LSL causes the decreased performance of the DSC by inducing more electron recombination.


## 4. Conclusion

In this study, we analyzed the light-scattering effect according to the LSL thickness on the performance of the DSC. The increase in the thickness of the LSL induces the improvement of the DSC performance by enhancing the light-scattering effect in the long-wave region and by increasing the dye-loading. However, an excessively thick LSL has a negative influence on the electron transport in the TiO2 photo-electrode due to the electron recombination despite the improved light-scattering effect and dye-loading. As a result, it was demonstrated that the increase of the LSL thickness to some degree is advantageous to improve the light-scattering effect, while the further thick LSL is not a crucial condition to improve the light-scattering effect. It is thought that this result will be a great positive factor in setting the standard conditions of the LSL for highly efficient DSC in the commercial DSC fabrication process.



---

*Source: 480929-2012-11-06.xml*