# Photocatalytic Treatment of Rhodamine 6G in Wastewater Using Photoactive ZnO

Authors: Doina Lutic; Cristina Coromelci-Pastravanu; Igor Cretescu; Ioannis Poulios; Catalina-Daniela Stan
Journal: International Journal of Photoenergy
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

The photocatalytic activity of zinc oxide, prepared by precipitation followed by calcination, was tested using rhodamine 6G as a rebel organic compound. The experiments were planned in order to allow an optimization procedure, by investigating the effects of different parameters such as the preparative method of the solid, amount of photocatalyst, pH of the reaction medium, and initial concentration of the dye. The results were compared with those obtained on P-25 Titania, and one of the samples had similar performances in terms of dye degradation degree, but needed higher pH values to prevent the photocatalyst degradation.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The interest for the photocatalytic degradation of different refractory organics present in wastewaters, such as dyes, drugs, and pesticides, comes from the relatively simple procedure and somehow easy-to-set practical setup. The photocatalytic reactions occur in conditions somehow similar to heterogeneous catalysis, involving the simultaneous adsorption of the organic reactant species and oxygen on solid, followed by the oxidation on the surface. The photoactive solid is a semiconductive oxide able to capture the energy for the reaction from photons. The photocatalyst must therefore adsorb simultaneously significant amounts of oxygen and reducing species (organic molecules). A performant photocatalyst is expected to offer adsorption sites for the organics, meaning that a high specific surface area and/or open pore structure are welcome. A very important feature of the photocatalysis is that the reaction can occur at temperature values close to ambient; therefore, the photoreactions are “greener,” since the thermal energy is expensive and, most often, its production is pollutant [1–4].The most intensively species used as photocatalyst is the titanium dioxide in the anatas form; due to its 3.2 eV band gap, it is able to capture the energy even from solar light, widely available, green, and costless. Current research is however devoted to investigate the behavior of other oxidic species such as ZnO, WO3, Fe2O3, SnO2, and combinations thereof as photocatalysts [5–9].Rhodamine 6G (R_6G) is a chemically stable organic dye, used often as a tracer to allow finding the transport direction and flow rate of water courses. Other applications concern the biotechnology (such as fluorescence microscopy and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy), and the biochemistry laboratories (as a diagnostic tool in medicine and plant pathology for the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), to detect the presence of a substance, usually an antigen, in a liquid sample or wet sample). Due to its high stability, it is interesting to find photocatalytic systems able to decompose R_6G to smaller biodegradable species or eventually mineralize it. There are quite many papers in the literature dealing with the photocatalytic degradation of several rhodamines, especially rhodamine B [10–16].The aim of the present work was to synthesize photocatalytically active zinc oxide (band gap around 3.3 eV [17]) and test it in the R_6G photodegradation. We investigated the influence of several operation parameters on the dye removal performance: the initial dye concentration, the pH value, and the photocatalyst concentration in the reaction medium. This study aims to investigate the properties of ZnO prepared in a very simple way in the photocatalytic degradation of a rebel test molecule, without investigating the degradation mechanism. The results will be used for comparisons with other transition metal oxides in the future studies.


## 2. Experimental Setup

The zinc oxide was prepared by precipitation as zinc hydroxide, followed by calcination. Zinc nitrate was used as precursor, due to its easy thermal decomposition in the target compound, if traces of the initial salt remain in the precipitate. Two precipitation agents were used, NaOH and urea.The precipitation with NaOH was performed at room temperature, by the simultaneous pouring of zinc nitrate and NaOH solutions under continuous magnetic stirring in a beaker, while monitored by a Hanna HI 991003 pH-meter, to help keeping the pH value at 9. The achievement of the complete precipitation degree occurred by heating the slurry at 353 K for 16 hours.The precipitation in the presence of urea was performed using a 5/1 molar ratio urea/Zn, by mixing the zinc nitrate solution with urea solution, at a concentration of zinc of about 0.25 moles L−1 in the final solution mixture. This solution was stirred at 363 K for 14 h under reflux; the final pH settled at 7. In the case of urea, the settlement of a basic pH value necessary for the precipitation is slowly obtained, due to the thermal decomposition of urea in ammonia and carbon dioxide. This procedure allows obtaining solids with special textures and superficial properties [18, 19], due to the slow formation of the crystal nuclei in the precipitation medium. The method is widely used in the synthesis of layered oxide structures and offers the possibility to obtain particles with a lower agglomeration degree and a more ordered structure, as regarded to those obtained in alkali precipitation medium.The solids were recovered in both cases by centrifugation at 4000 rpm, washed several times with ultrapure water, dried at 353 K, then calcined 4 h at 500°C with a heating rate of 1° min−1, then cooled down spontaneously. The samples were labeled as with ZnO-NaOH and ZnO-Urea.The characterization of the solids was performed by X-ray diffraction, IR spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and BET nitrogen adsorption. The XRD patterns were obtained on a Shimadzu D6000 machine, in the range of 5–70°, using CuKα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å), in steps of 0.05°. The IR spectra were collected on an ABB MB 3000 apparatus. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to show the morphology of the synthesized solids; a SEMTescan VEGA II LSH was used in this respect.The photocatalytic activities of both synthesized ZnO samples were studied for the photodegradation of R_6G dye (C28H31N2O3Cl); the formula is presented in Figure 1.Figure 1
Chemical structure of R_6G.The photocatalytic degradation was performed using a cylindrical glass reactor (Figure2), accommodating a central quartz tube in which an Osram UV-A lamp of 9 W (wavelength range 350–400 nm, maximum at 370 nm) is placed to irradiate the dye solution. At the bottom of the reactor, a magnetic range assures the homogenization. The experiments were performed on samples of 300 mL aqueous solutions of dye prepared with ultrapure water. The pH value was set using sulfuric acid 0.1 M or natrium hydroxide 0.1 M. The photocatalyst powder was dispersed in the dye solution, magnetically stirred for 30 minutes in dark, in order to enable establishing the adsorption/desorption equilibrium, then the lamp was turned on. Samples of 5 mL suspension were taken at specific time intervals, filtered immediately to separate completely the catalyst particles, and measured to determine the remaining dye concentration. Zero time reading was considered the moment when the lamp was turned on.Figure 2
Experimental setup for the photocatalytic degradation.The dye concentration was measured by UV-vis spectroscopy, using a Shimadzu UV-1700 spectrophotometer; the UV-vis spectrum of R_6G displays a net maximum at 530 nm. An initial calibration was performed to check the extinction-concentration linearity and to ease the calculation of the concentration value by simple reading of the extinction for the dye solutions exposed to UV and/or contacted in dark with ZnO.The photocatalytic tests were performed in ambient air. The pH values were monitored using a Microprocessor WTW pH 95 pH Meter. A scheme of the experimental setup is displayed in Figure2.The decolorization and photocatalytic degradation efficiency were calculated using the following:(1)Dye_removal(%)=C0-CtC0×100,
where C0 and Ct are the initial and t is time concentrations of R_6G.


## 3. Results and Discussions

### 3.1. Characterization of the Photocatalyst

The XRD patterns of the samples ZnO-NaOH and ZnO-urea, presented in Figure3, indicate well-crystallized solids, exhibiting the main peaks due to zinc oxide phase, as filed in JCPDS: 89–7102 [20] and no impurity phases. The peaks are somehow sharper and higher for the sample obtained with urea, indicating a more uniform and better-crystallized solid.Figure 3
XRD pattern of ZnO samples.The XRD pattern also allowed calculating the medium crystallite size using Debye-Scherrer equation. The particle medium size, considering the factorK=0.94, gave values of 21.5 nm for the sample ZnO-urea and 14.4 nm for ZnO-NaOH. These particle sizes represent the dimensions of the primary particles, which associate in groups of several hundreds of nanometers, as shown on the SEM images (Figure 4). The grouping of the particles keeps a relatively uniform aspect of the bulk powder.SEM images of ZnO-urea (a) and ZnO-NaOH (b).
(a)
(b)The agglomerations of ZnO-urea particles are almost spherical in shape and still keep a big free volume fraction in between, which is beneficial for the organic diffusion to the solid surface during the adsorption step. The ZnO-NaOH sample consists of grain associations with more planar shape and have the tendency to agglomerate very tightly, offering a smaller interparticle free space.The IR transmission spectra of our samples were compared with those of a commercial zinc oxide, see Figure5.Figure 5
IR spectra of zinc oxide samples.The spectra for the samples synthesized in our laboratory are quite similar and in line with the literature data [21]; only small differences in peaks intensities are noticed for our two samples. The peaks around 3600 cm−1 indicate the presence of OH groups derived from water adsorption [22], while the one at 1636 cm−1 is due to the characteristic H2O scissoring mode. The peak from 2345 cm−1 is due to the CO2 adsorption on the basic sites of ZnO [23] and is missing in the commercial sample.The BET analysis allowed the determination of the BET-specific surface areas, found to be 17.3 m2 g−1 for ZnO-urea and, respectively, 13.04 m2 g−1 for the ZnO-NaOH sample. The slow precipitation leads to higher specific surface areas, as expected. The isotherms of type 3 according to IUPAC, indicates low porosity solids, with a very narrow hysteresis loop. No significant internal porosity is found on these samples, see Figure 6.Figure 6
BET analysis results for ZnO.


### 3.2. Photocatalytic Experiments

Three parameters were considered important for dye degradation process, namely, the photocatalyst concentration, the pH value, and the initial dye concentration. In the parametric study, two of the above-mentioned factors were kept constant and the third was varied, in order to define their individual and simultaneous influence on the process. The comparison between our samples and titanium dioxide P-25 was made, in some cases, by performing selected experiments in similar conditions.


#### 3.2.1. Influence of Catalyst Concentration

This series of experiments was performed at a constant pH = 10 value, working with an initial concentration of R_6G of 50 ppm. We used three concentrations of solid photocatalyst: 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 g photocatalyst per liter of dye solution. A blank probe (irradiation with no catalyst) gave very low degrees of decolorizing, so we considered negligible the contribution of the radiation alone to decompose R_6G, in the time duration involved in the experiments; similar behavior for rhodamine B has been communicated by Fan et al., [24], Natarajan et al. [25], and Chen et al. [26]. The removal degree in time is displayed in Figure 7.Figure 7
The influence of catalyst concentration on R_6G decolorization (pH = 10, 50 ppm initial dye concentration).For all the tested photocatalyst samples, the same characteristic for the removal of R_6G is noticed. They strongly adsorb the dye in the equilibrium period of 30 minutes before the exposure to UV light; more than 60% of the dye is removed from the solution in all the tested mixtures. The photocatalytic reaction follows a slow increasing slope. The values of the total removal degree are similar for both samples, over 80% in 2 hours of irradiation. Since the removal degree of the dye on the photocatalyst in the medium containing 0.3 g catalyst per liter of dye solution is very close to the ones in the system with 0.5 g catalyst, we admit from this point forward the 0.3 g/L as the optimal concentration value.


#### 3.2.2. The Influence of the Reaction pH

In order to investigate the influence of the pH role of the reaction medium on R_6G decolorizing, this series of experiments was performed using 0.3 g/L catalyst, at pH values of 6.6, 8.5, and 10. The initial R_6G concentration in these experiments was 30 ppm. The dye removal in these conditions is presented in Figure8.Figure 8
The pH influence on R_6G decolorizing after 30 and 90 minutes of photoreaction (0.3 g/L catalyst, 30 ppm pf dye initially).The differences in the degree of dye removal at the mentioned pH values are interesting to comment. The high values of the pH are favorable on dye degradation on ZnO-urea sample at both mentioned irradiation durations, 30 and 90 minutes. On the ZnO-NaOH sample, an optimum value of 8.5 for the reaction run can be defined at the considered time values. The dye removal degree reaches 98% on ZnO-Urea at pH = 10 in 90 minutes.This somehow unexpected behavior determined us to investigate the dye removal by measuring the remaining concentrations at intermediate time values between up to 120 minutes of the photocatalytic reaction, Figure9.Figure 9
R_6G concentration profile in time (0.3 g/L photocatalyst, 30 ppm/L dye) and TOC values for ZnO-urea sample, at pH = 10 and two photocatalyst concentrations.The evolution of the dye removal in time follows a special dynamic. A strong removal degree by adsorption is noticed during the equilibrium stage before the irradiation, followed by the increase of the dye concentration in the beginning of the photocatalysis step. In some cases this behavior repeats several times, see the curve for ZnO-NaOH at pH = 8.5. As will be shown in the next paragraph, the phenomenon is not observed if the initial R_6G concentration is low (5 ppm). The explanation for this behavior could be the massive adsorption of the dye on ZnO. The R_6G molecules are adsorbed on the functional groups of ZnO (most probably, OH groups, able to interact with the amino and ammonium groups from the structure of R_6G) and they allow the subsequent adsorption of the incoming R_6G molecules, most probably by forming “multilayers,” since the value of the specific surface area of the solid after the adsorption step does not change significantly (17 m2 g−1 for the ZnO-Urea sample after the adsorption, compared to 17.3 m2 g−1 of the initial sample). When the photodegradation begins, the first layer of adsorbed molecules on the photocatalyst surface is destroyed by the photodegradation of several molecules. The other molecules stacked on them are mobilized to the solution and the concentration of the dye increases. They are subsequently readsorbed and finally photodegraded. This statement is further confirmed by the TOC values (inlet Figure 9), showing that the mineralization degree reaches only 20% in 2 hours of photocatalytic process. The chromophore groups were totally destroyed during this time; the behavior is similar to that observed by Chen et al. [27].


#### 3.2.3. The Influence of Dye Concentration

In order to study influence of the dye concentration on the degradation process, the pH value was kept at 8.5 and the catalyst concentration at 0.3 g/L, while the dye concentrations for the tests were 5, 30, and 50 ppm, see Figure10.The dye removal in time at 5, 30, and 50 ppm of R_6G (0.3 g photocatalyst/L, pH = 8.5).
(a)
(b)
(c)An almost constant increase of the R-6G removal degree occurs at the low value of 5 ppm dye on the sample ZnO-Urea. In this case, after 2 hours of irradiation the removal of the organic is practically total. The other solid has a similar but less performant behavior. At the higher concentrations values, the removal occurs in 2 hours at degrees of around 80% for the initial value of 30 ppm and of 70–75% for the solution containing 50 ppm of R_6G. This group of experiments proves a better net behavior of the ZnO-urea sample in comparison with ZnO-NaOH.


#### 3.2.4. Comparison with TiO2 Degussa P-25

The use of other photocatalysts is interesting especially when the widely used and very versatile P-25 Titania cannot be used. Titania is stable and active in slightly acidic conditions, but occur important structural degradations at alkaline pH values, while ZnO is only stable in neutral to alkaline medium.In order to compare the performance in the photoreaction of our ZnO samples with the results obtained on Titania, we performed two experiments on both ZnO samples at pH = 10 and on P-25 at pH values of 7 and 10, using an initial solution of 30 ppm R_6G at a photocatalyst concentration of 0.3 g/L, Figure11.Figure 11
Comparison between R_6G removal on ZnO and TiO2.The dye removal on TiO2 indicates its different adsorptive behavior in function of the pH value. There is a clear higher adsorption degree at pH = 7 than at pH = 10, but the photocatalytic reaction brings quite similar removal degrees for both pH values, over 80% for both cases.The performance of the ZnO-urea is closely similar to that on P-25. Since the stability at high pH values is better for ZnO than for TiO2, our photocatalyst could be an alternative to the well-known P-25, for the photocatalytic reactions performed in basic solutions for rebel compounds decomposition.In Table1 are presented some selected results comparing the photocatalytic activity of ZnO samples and TiO2, at pH values ensuring the stability of the samples.Table 1
Selected results on photocatalytic activities of the ZnO and TiO2 samples.
ZnO_urea90 minpH 8.5
ZnO_NaOH90 minpH 8.5
ZnO_urea90 minpH 10
ZnO_NaOH90 minpH 10
TiO290 minpH 3.7
TiO290 minpH 5.5
R_6G30 ppm
74.70
71.41
94.34
75.42
86.02
92.43
R_6G50 ppm
67.10
48.86
85.19
—
—
84.68The values show that the activity of ZnO-urea sample at alkaline pH is close to that of TiO2 at pH values lower with about 3 units.


## 3.1. Characterization of the Photocatalyst

The XRD patterns of the samples ZnO-NaOH and ZnO-urea, presented in Figure3, indicate well-crystallized solids, exhibiting the main peaks due to zinc oxide phase, as filed in JCPDS: 89–7102 [20] and no impurity phases. The peaks are somehow sharper and higher for the sample obtained with urea, indicating a more uniform and better-crystallized solid.Figure 3
XRD pattern of ZnO samples.The XRD pattern also allowed calculating the medium crystallite size using Debye-Scherrer equation. The particle medium size, considering the factorK=0.94, gave values of 21.5 nm for the sample ZnO-urea and 14.4 nm for ZnO-NaOH. These particle sizes represent the dimensions of the primary particles, which associate in groups of several hundreds of nanometers, as shown on the SEM images (Figure 4). The grouping of the particles keeps a relatively uniform aspect of the bulk powder.SEM images of ZnO-urea (a) and ZnO-NaOH (b).
(a)
(b)The agglomerations of ZnO-urea particles are almost spherical in shape and still keep a big free volume fraction in between, which is beneficial for the organic diffusion to the solid surface during the adsorption step. The ZnO-NaOH sample consists of grain associations with more planar shape and have the tendency to agglomerate very tightly, offering a smaller interparticle free space.The IR transmission spectra of our samples were compared with those of a commercial zinc oxide, see Figure5.Figure 5
IR spectra of zinc oxide samples.The spectra for the samples synthesized in our laboratory are quite similar and in line with the literature data [21]; only small differences in peaks intensities are noticed for our two samples. The peaks around 3600 cm−1 indicate the presence of OH groups derived from water adsorption [22], while the one at 1636 cm−1 is due to the characteristic H2O scissoring mode. The peak from 2345 cm−1 is due to the CO2 adsorption on the basic sites of ZnO [23] and is missing in the commercial sample.The BET analysis allowed the determination of the BET-specific surface areas, found to be 17.3 m2 g−1 for ZnO-urea and, respectively, 13.04 m2 g−1 for the ZnO-NaOH sample. The slow precipitation leads to higher specific surface areas, as expected. The isotherms of type 3 according to IUPAC, indicates low porosity solids, with a very narrow hysteresis loop. No significant internal porosity is found on these samples, see Figure 6.Figure 6
BET analysis results for ZnO.


## 3.2. Photocatalytic Experiments

Three parameters were considered important for dye degradation process, namely, the photocatalyst concentration, the pH value, and the initial dye concentration. In the parametric study, two of the above-mentioned factors were kept constant and the third was varied, in order to define their individual and simultaneous influence on the process. The comparison between our samples and titanium dioxide P-25 was made, in some cases, by performing selected experiments in similar conditions.


### 3.2.1. Influence of Catalyst Concentration

This series of experiments was performed at a constant pH = 10 value, working with an initial concentration of R_6G of 50 ppm. We used three concentrations of solid photocatalyst: 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 g photocatalyst per liter of dye solution. A blank probe (irradiation with no catalyst) gave very low degrees of decolorizing, so we considered negligible the contribution of the radiation alone to decompose R_6G, in the time duration involved in the experiments; similar behavior for rhodamine B has been communicated by Fan et al., [24], Natarajan et al. [25], and Chen et al. [26]. The removal degree in time is displayed in Figure 7.Figure 7
The influence of catalyst concentration on R_6G decolorization (pH = 10, 50 ppm initial dye concentration).For all the tested photocatalyst samples, the same characteristic for the removal of R_6G is noticed. They strongly adsorb the dye in the equilibrium period of 30 minutes before the exposure to UV light; more than 60% of the dye is removed from the solution in all the tested mixtures. The photocatalytic reaction follows a slow increasing slope. The values of the total removal degree are similar for both samples, over 80% in 2 hours of irradiation. Since the removal degree of the dye on the photocatalyst in the medium containing 0.3 g catalyst per liter of dye solution is very close to the ones in the system with 0.5 g catalyst, we admit from this point forward the 0.3 g/L as the optimal concentration value.


### 3.2.2. The Influence of the Reaction pH

In order to investigate the influence of the pH role of the reaction medium on R_6G decolorizing, this series of experiments was performed using 0.3 g/L catalyst, at pH values of 6.6, 8.5, and 10. The initial R_6G concentration in these experiments was 30 ppm. The dye removal in these conditions is presented in Figure8.Figure 8
The pH influence on R_6G decolorizing after 30 and 90 minutes of photoreaction (0.3 g/L catalyst, 30 ppm pf dye initially).The differences in the degree of dye removal at the mentioned pH values are interesting to comment. The high values of the pH are favorable on dye degradation on ZnO-urea sample at both mentioned irradiation durations, 30 and 90 minutes. On the ZnO-NaOH sample, an optimum value of 8.5 for the reaction run can be defined at the considered time values. The dye removal degree reaches 98% on ZnO-Urea at pH = 10 in 90 minutes.This somehow unexpected behavior determined us to investigate the dye removal by measuring the remaining concentrations at intermediate time values between up to 120 minutes of the photocatalytic reaction, Figure9.Figure 9
R_6G concentration profile in time (0.3 g/L photocatalyst, 30 ppm/L dye) and TOC values for ZnO-urea sample, at pH = 10 and two photocatalyst concentrations.The evolution of the dye removal in time follows a special dynamic. A strong removal degree by adsorption is noticed during the equilibrium stage before the irradiation, followed by the increase of the dye concentration in the beginning of the photocatalysis step. In some cases this behavior repeats several times, see the curve for ZnO-NaOH at pH = 8.5. As will be shown in the next paragraph, the phenomenon is not observed if the initial R_6G concentration is low (5 ppm). The explanation for this behavior could be the massive adsorption of the dye on ZnO. The R_6G molecules are adsorbed on the functional groups of ZnO (most probably, OH groups, able to interact with the amino and ammonium groups from the structure of R_6G) and they allow the subsequent adsorption of the incoming R_6G molecules, most probably by forming “multilayers,” since the value of the specific surface area of the solid after the adsorption step does not change significantly (17 m2 g−1 for the ZnO-Urea sample after the adsorption, compared to 17.3 m2 g−1 of the initial sample). When the photodegradation begins, the first layer of adsorbed molecules on the photocatalyst surface is destroyed by the photodegradation of several molecules. The other molecules stacked on them are mobilized to the solution and the concentration of the dye increases. They are subsequently readsorbed and finally photodegraded. This statement is further confirmed by the TOC values (inlet Figure 9), showing that the mineralization degree reaches only 20% in 2 hours of photocatalytic process. The chromophore groups were totally destroyed during this time; the behavior is similar to that observed by Chen et al. [27].


### 3.2.3. The Influence of Dye Concentration

In order to study influence of the dye concentration on the degradation process, the pH value was kept at 8.5 and the catalyst concentration at 0.3 g/L, while the dye concentrations for the tests were 5, 30, and 50 ppm, see Figure10.The dye removal in time at 5, 30, and 50 ppm of R_6G (0.3 g photocatalyst/L, pH = 8.5).
(a)
(b)
(c)An almost constant increase of the R-6G removal degree occurs at the low value of 5 ppm dye on the sample ZnO-Urea. In this case, after 2 hours of irradiation the removal of the organic is practically total. The other solid has a similar but less performant behavior. At the higher concentrations values, the removal occurs in 2 hours at degrees of around 80% for the initial value of 30 ppm and of 70–75% for the solution containing 50 ppm of R_6G. This group of experiments proves a better net behavior of the ZnO-urea sample in comparison with ZnO-NaOH.


### 3.2.4. Comparison with TiO2 Degussa P-25

The use of other photocatalysts is interesting especially when the widely used and very versatile P-25 Titania cannot be used. Titania is stable and active in slightly acidic conditions, but occur important structural degradations at alkaline pH values, while ZnO is only stable in neutral to alkaline medium.In order to compare the performance in the photoreaction of our ZnO samples with the results obtained on Titania, we performed two experiments on both ZnO samples at pH = 10 and on P-25 at pH values of 7 and 10, using an initial solution of 30 ppm R_6G at a photocatalyst concentration of 0.3 g/L, Figure11.Figure 11
Comparison between R_6G removal on ZnO and TiO2.The dye removal on TiO2 indicates its different adsorptive behavior in function of the pH value. There is a clear higher adsorption degree at pH = 7 than at pH = 10, but the photocatalytic reaction brings quite similar removal degrees for both pH values, over 80% for both cases.The performance of the ZnO-urea is closely similar to that on P-25. Since the stability at high pH values is better for ZnO than for TiO2, our photocatalyst could be an alternative to the well-known P-25, for the photocatalytic reactions performed in basic solutions for rebel compounds decomposition.In Table1 are presented some selected results comparing the photocatalytic activity of ZnO samples and TiO2, at pH values ensuring the stability of the samples.Table 1
Selected results on photocatalytic activities of the ZnO and TiO2 samples.
ZnO_urea90 minpH 8.5
ZnO_NaOH90 minpH 8.5
ZnO_urea90 minpH 10
ZnO_NaOH90 minpH 10
TiO290 minpH 3.7
TiO290 minpH 5.5
R_6G30 ppm
74.70
71.41
94.34
75.42
86.02
92.43
R_6G50 ppm
67.10
48.86
85.19
—
—
84.68The values show that the activity of ZnO-urea sample at alkaline pH is close to that of TiO2 at pH values lower with about 3 units.


## 3.2.1. Influence of Catalyst Concentration

This series of experiments was performed at a constant pH = 10 value, working with an initial concentration of R_6G of 50 ppm. We used three concentrations of solid photocatalyst: 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 g photocatalyst per liter of dye solution. A blank probe (irradiation with no catalyst) gave very low degrees of decolorizing, so we considered negligible the contribution of the radiation alone to decompose R_6G, in the time duration involved in the experiments; similar behavior for rhodamine B has been communicated by Fan et al., [24], Natarajan et al. [25], and Chen et al. [26]. The removal degree in time is displayed in Figure 7.Figure 7
The influence of catalyst concentration on R_6G decolorization (pH = 10, 50 ppm initial dye concentration).For all the tested photocatalyst samples, the same characteristic for the removal of R_6G is noticed. They strongly adsorb the dye in the equilibrium period of 30 minutes before the exposure to UV light; more than 60% of the dye is removed from the solution in all the tested mixtures. The photocatalytic reaction follows a slow increasing slope. The values of the total removal degree are similar for both samples, over 80% in 2 hours of irradiation. Since the removal degree of the dye on the photocatalyst in the medium containing 0.3 g catalyst per liter of dye solution is very close to the ones in the system with 0.5 g catalyst, we admit from this point forward the 0.3 g/L as the optimal concentration value.


## 3.2.2. The Influence of the Reaction pH

In order to investigate the influence of the pH role of the reaction medium on R_6G decolorizing, this series of experiments was performed using 0.3 g/L catalyst, at pH values of 6.6, 8.5, and 10. The initial R_6G concentration in these experiments was 30 ppm. The dye removal in these conditions is presented in Figure8.Figure 8
The pH influence on R_6G decolorizing after 30 and 90 minutes of photoreaction (0.3 g/L catalyst, 30 ppm pf dye initially).The differences in the degree of dye removal at the mentioned pH values are interesting to comment. The high values of the pH are favorable on dye degradation on ZnO-urea sample at both mentioned irradiation durations, 30 and 90 minutes. On the ZnO-NaOH sample, an optimum value of 8.5 for the reaction run can be defined at the considered time values. The dye removal degree reaches 98% on ZnO-Urea at pH = 10 in 90 minutes.This somehow unexpected behavior determined us to investigate the dye removal by measuring the remaining concentrations at intermediate time values between up to 120 minutes of the photocatalytic reaction, Figure9.Figure 9
R_6G concentration profile in time (0.3 g/L photocatalyst, 30 ppm/L dye) and TOC values for ZnO-urea sample, at pH = 10 and two photocatalyst concentrations.The evolution of the dye removal in time follows a special dynamic. A strong removal degree by adsorption is noticed during the equilibrium stage before the irradiation, followed by the increase of the dye concentration in the beginning of the photocatalysis step. In some cases this behavior repeats several times, see the curve for ZnO-NaOH at pH = 8.5. As will be shown in the next paragraph, the phenomenon is not observed if the initial R_6G concentration is low (5 ppm). The explanation for this behavior could be the massive adsorption of the dye on ZnO. The R_6G molecules are adsorbed on the functional groups of ZnO (most probably, OH groups, able to interact with the amino and ammonium groups from the structure of R_6G) and they allow the subsequent adsorption of the incoming R_6G molecules, most probably by forming “multilayers,” since the value of the specific surface area of the solid after the adsorption step does not change significantly (17 m2 g−1 for the ZnO-Urea sample after the adsorption, compared to 17.3 m2 g−1 of the initial sample). When the photodegradation begins, the first layer of adsorbed molecules on the photocatalyst surface is destroyed by the photodegradation of several molecules. The other molecules stacked on them are mobilized to the solution and the concentration of the dye increases. They are subsequently readsorbed and finally photodegraded. This statement is further confirmed by the TOC values (inlet Figure 9), showing that the mineralization degree reaches only 20% in 2 hours of photocatalytic process. The chromophore groups were totally destroyed during this time; the behavior is similar to that observed by Chen et al. [27].


## 3.2.3. The Influence of Dye Concentration

In order to study influence of the dye concentration on the degradation process, the pH value was kept at 8.5 and the catalyst concentration at 0.3 g/L, while the dye concentrations for the tests were 5, 30, and 50 ppm, see Figure10.The dye removal in time at 5, 30, and 50 ppm of R_6G (0.3 g photocatalyst/L, pH = 8.5).
(a)
(b)
(c)An almost constant increase of the R-6G removal degree occurs at the low value of 5 ppm dye on the sample ZnO-Urea. In this case, after 2 hours of irradiation the removal of the organic is practically total. The other solid has a similar but less performant behavior. At the higher concentrations values, the removal occurs in 2 hours at degrees of around 80% for the initial value of 30 ppm and of 70–75% for the solution containing 50 ppm of R_6G. This group of experiments proves a better net behavior of the ZnO-urea sample in comparison with ZnO-NaOH.


## 3.2.4. Comparison with TiO2 Degussa P-25

The use of other photocatalysts is interesting especially when the widely used and very versatile P-25 Titania cannot be used. Titania is stable and active in slightly acidic conditions, but occur important structural degradations at alkaline pH values, while ZnO is only stable in neutral to alkaline medium.In order to compare the performance in the photoreaction of our ZnO samples with the results obtained on Titania, we performed two experiments on both ZnO samples at pH = 10 and on P-25 at pH values of 7 and 10, using an initial solution of 30 ppm R_6G at a photocatalyst concentration of 0.3 g/L, Figure11.Figure 11
Comparison between R_6G removal on ZnO and TiO2.The dye removal on TiO2 indicates its different adsorptive behavior in function of the pH value. There is a clear higher adsorption degree at pH = 7 than at pH = 10, but the photocatalytic reaction brings quite similar removal degrees for both pH values, over 80% for both cases.The performance of the ZnO-urea is closely similar to that on P-25. Since the stability at high pH values is better for ZnO than for TiO2, our photocatalyst could be an alternative to the well-known P-25, for the photocatalytic reactions performed in basic solutions for rebel compounds decomposition.In Table1 are presented some selected results comparing the photocatalytic activity of ZnO samples and TiO2, at pH values ensuring the stability of the samples.Table 1
Selected results on photocatalytic activities of the ZnO and TiO2 samples.
ZnO_urea90 minpH 8.5
ZnO_NaOH90 minpH 8.5
ZnO_urea90 minpH 10
ZnO_NaOH90 minpH 10
TiO290 minpH 3.7
TiO290 minpH 5.5
R_6G30 ppm
74.70
71.41
94.34
75.42
86.02
92.43
R_6G50 ppm
67.10
48.86
85.19
—
—
84.68The values show that the activity of ZnO-urea sample at alkaline pH is close to that of TiO2 at pH values lower with about 3 units.


## 4. Conclusions

The zinc oxide prepared by zinc nitrate precipitation in urea medium, followed by calcination at 500°C, led to the obtaining of a zinc oxide sample with high capabilities of R_6G removal from slightly basic aqueous media. The study of parameters influencing the decolorizing process allowed us to find the operating conditions for achieving the highest dye removal rate: pH values over 8.5, up to 10; catalyst concentration 0.3 g/L; initial dye concentrations higher than 30 ppm. A strong initial adsorption is noticed on ZnO samples, followed by a slow photocatalytic reaction on ZnO. The global performance in terms of dye removal is comparable with that obtained on P-25 Titania, known as the most typical and widely applied photocatalyst.



---

*Source: 475131-2012-12-06.xml*