# The Effect of High-Intensity Intermittent Exercise on Body Composition of Overweight Young Males

Authors: M. Heydari; J. Freund; S. H. Boutcher
Journal: Journal of Obesity
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

To determine the effect of a 12-week high intensity intermittent exercise (HIIE) intervention on total body, abdominal, trunk, visceral fat mass, and fat free mass of young overweight males.  Participants were randomly assigned to either exercise or control group. The intervention group received HIIE three times per week, 20 min per session, for 12 weeks. Aerobic power improved significantly (P<0.001) by 15% for the exercising group. Exercisers compared to controls experienced significant weight loss of 1.5 kg (P<0.005) and a significant reduction in total fat mass of 2 kg (P<0.001). Abdominal and trunk adiposity was also significantly reduced in the exercising group by 0.1 kg (P<0.05) and 1.5 kg (P<0.001).  Also the exercise group had a significant (P<0.01) 17% reduction in visceral fat after 12 weeks of HIIE, whereas waist circumference was significantly decreased by week six (P<0.001). Fat free mass was significantly increased (P<0.05) in the exercising group by 0.4 kg for the leg and 0.7 kg for the trunk. No significant change (P>0.05) occurred in levels of insulin, HOMA-IR, and blood lipids. Twelve weeks of HIIE resulted in significant reductions
in total, abdominal, trunk, and visceral fat and significant increases in fat free mass and aerobic power.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Obesity levels continue to increase in both developed and developing countries [1]. As being overweight is associated with numerous health problems, effective fat loss strategies are required [2]. Although dieting has been the major fat loss method, aerobic exercise programs have been shown to increase cardiorespiratory fitness [3] and preserve fat-free mass [4]. Most aerobic exercise interventions have consisted of moderate-intensity steady-state exercise, for about 30 to 40 min for 3 to 4 days per week, over a four- to six-month period. Disappointingly, these kinds of exercise programs have resulted in minimal fat loss [5, 6].In contrast, high-intensity intermittent exercise (HIIE) has been shown to result in greater fat loss [7]. For example, Trapp et al. [8] conducted a HIIE program in young women for 15 weeks with three 20 min sessions per week. HIIE consisted of an 8 s sprint followed by 12 s of low intensity cycling, repeated for 20 min. Another group of women carried out an aerobic cycling protocol for 40 min each session. Results showed that women in the HIIE group lost 2.5 kg of subcutaneous fat, whereas no change occurred with steady state aerobic exercise. Fat loss accruing through 15 weeks of HIIE was attained with 50% less exercise time commitment and a similar energy expenditure to that of steady-state exercise. Importantly, the women in this study also showed a significant 0.6 kg increase in fat-free mass (FFM) after HIIE, whereas FFM of the steady state exercise group was unchanged. The lack of increase in FFM accompanying steady-state exercise is in agreement with prior research in this area [9].With regard to abdominal fat, 15 weeks of HIIE led to a 0.15 kg reduction of fat in previously untrained young women [8]. As women in this study possessed moderate levels of abdominal fat it is feasible that the greater abdominal, trunk, and visceral fat of men may show greater reductions after exposure to HIIE. For example, Boudou et al. [10] studied older type 2 diabetic males and found that after 8 weeks of HIIE, abdominal adiposity was decreased by 44%. Whether regular HIIE will also reduce the abdominal and visceral fat of young nondiabetic but overweight males is undetermined.Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of 20 min bouts of HIIE, repeated three times weekly for 12 weeks, on body composition of overweight males. It was hypothesized that HIIE would result in significant reductions in total abdominal, trunk, and visceral fat and a significant increase in fat-free mass and aerobic power.


## 2. Subjects and Methods

### 2.1. Subjects

Forty-six inactive, overweight men were recruited from a university population and randomly allocated into either exercise (n=25) or control groups (n=21). The exercisers and controls were similar in terms of age (24.7±4.8 and 25.1±3.9 years) and body mass index (BMI: 28.4±0.5 and 29 ± 0.9 kg m−2). The study received approval from a University Research Ethics Committee. Forty-six subjects underwent initial testing, however, for various reasons five withdrew from the exercise group and three from the control group. There was no significant difference for any variable between the nonadherents and those males who completed the study.


### 2.2. Procedures

Subjects were advised to avoid strenuous activity and caffeine consumption for 24 hours prior to testing, and attended the laboratory after a 10-hour overnight fast. Tests for all subjects in control and exercise groups were completed at the same time of day. The Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire [11] was filled out and information on subjects’ personal and familial medical history obtained. Fasting blood (300 mL) was drawn at baseline, and at weeks 3, 6, and 12 from an antecubital vein in EDTA vacutainers. An automated enzymatic method (Cholestech LDX, USA) was applied to quantify blood lipid profiles and glucose concentrations from whole blood. The remaining whole blood in EDTA tubes was spun immediately in a chilled centrifuge (Model Megafuge 1.0R, Heraeus, Germany) at 4°C and frozen at −86°C for later analysis. Aerobic power was assessed using a TrueMax 2400 Metabolic Cart (ParvoMedics Inc, USA) and an electronically braked cycle ergometer, Monark 869 (Monark, Sweden). For subjects who could not achieve the criteria for V̇O2max, due to the strenuous nature of the exercise session V̇O2peak was used as an indicant of aerobic power.


### 2.3. Resting Metabolic Rate (RMR)

Fasted subjects relaxed in a reclined position for 30 minutes. Resting heart rate, resting energy expenditure (REE),V̇O2, and V̇CO2 were assessed using a metabolic cart (TrueMax 2400 Metabolic Cart, ParvoMedics Inc, USA).V̇O2 represents the rate of oxygen utilised by subjects during exercise, whereas V̇CO2  represents the rate of carbon dioxide exhaled. Subjects were advised not to sleep and breathe naturally during testing. The first 10 minutes of data collection were excluded from analysis to allow for subject stabilization.


### 2.4. Diet

Subjects in both exercise and control groups were advised to maintain their normal eating habits during the study. On their first and last visit to the laboratory subjects provided a 3-day diet inventory which was analyzed using diet analysis software (SERVE Nutrition Management Systems, Professional Edition, version 5, Australia).


### 2.5. Body Composition

A Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scan with a Lunar Prodigy scanner (software version 7.51, GE Corporation, USA) was used to measure body mass and percentage body fat. Fat mass (FM) along with FFM in kg was measured for the whole body. DEXA also provided information on abdominal and trunk fat, as indicators of central adiposity. Computerised tomography (CT) scans (Philips Gemini GXL 16, the Netherlands) were also used to measure abdominal and visceral fat distribution. Axial slices (3 × 10 mm) were performed through the abdomen at L2/L3 and L4/L5. Fat density of 0.9 mg/L was assumed [12], and it was automatically selected at any tissue between 150 to 50 Hounsfield Units (HU). Gemini software (GXL Host system) was used to analyse the CT images. Abdominal, visceral, and subcutaneous fat were determined at the levels of L2/L3 and L4/L5. BMI was calculated by dividing weight by height squared (kg m−2).


### 2.6. High-Intensity Intermittent Exercise Training

Subjects in the exercise group completed supervised exercise (8 s sprint, 12 s recovery) continuously throughout each 20-min session. The HIIE workload was set at 80–90% of each subject’s heart rate (HR) peak at a cadence between 120 and 130 r.p.m and recovery was set at the same amount of resistance but at a cadence of 40 r.p.m. Subjects were instructed to keep their exercise intensity at a level necessary to produce a HR between 80–90% of HR peak. As subjects adapted to HIIE training, workload was increased so HR stayed at the appropriate 80–90% HR peak level. HIIE was coordinated with a prerecorded compact disc counting down each sprint in a 3-2-1 manner. Subjects performed a 5-min warm-up and cool-down on the bike prior to and after each exercise session. All training cycling data included continuous recording of HR and r.p.m, whereas rating of perceived exertion [13] (RPE) was assessed at 5-min intervals.


### 2.7. Assays

Insulin was measured using commercially available ELISA immunoassay kits. The degree of enzymatic turnover of the substrate was determined by dual wavelength absorbance measurement at 450 and 620 nm (Dako K6219, Denmark). HOMA-IR, an insulin resistance index [14], was calculated as follows:(1)HOMA-IR=[fastinginsulin(μIU/mL)×fastingbloodglucose(mmol/L)]22.5.


### 2.8. Statistical Analysis

Data were analysed with the Statistical Package for Social Science for Windows software (SPSS 18, USA). To examine changes after the intervention, an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to evaluate differences between the two groups for variables that did not violate ANCOVA assumptions. Preintervention values were used as covariates. Where assumptions were violated, an independentt-test was conducted on the difference scores. The statistical analysis was considered significant when the probability level was less than 0.05.


## 2.1. Subjects

Forty-six inactive, overweight men were recruited from a university population and randomly allocated into either exercise (n=25) or control groups (n=21). The exercisers and controls were similar in terms of age (24.7±4.8 and 25.1±3.9 years) and body mass index (BMI: 28.4±0.5 and 29 ± 0.9 kg m−2). The study received approval from a University Research Ethics Committee. Forty-six subjects underwent initial testing, however, for various reasons five withdrew from the exercise group and three from the control group. There was no significant difference for any variable between the nonadherents and those males who completed the study.


## 2.2. Procedures

Subjects were advised to avoid strenuous activity and caffeine consumption for 24 hours prior to testing, and attended the laboratory after a 10-hour overnight fast. Tests for all subjects in control and exercise groups were completed at the same time of day. The Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire [11] was filled out and information on subjects’ personal and familial medical history obtained. Fasting blood (300 mL) was drawn at baseline, and at weeks 3, 6, and 12 from an antecubital vein in EDTA vacutainers. An automated enzymatic method (Cholestech LDX, USA) was applied to quantify blood lipid profiles and glucose concentrations from whole blood. The remaining whole blood in EDTA tubes was spun immediately in a chilled centrifuge (Model Megafuge 1.0R, Heraeus, Germany) at 4°C and frozen at −86°C for later analysis. Aerobic power was assessed using a TrueMax 2400 Metabolic Cart (ParvoMedics Inc, USA) and an electronically braked cycle ergometer, Monark 869 (Monark, Sweden). For subjects who could not achieve the criteria for V̇O2max, due to the strenuous nature of the exercise session V̇O2peak was used as an indicant of aerobic power.


## 2.3. Resting Metabolic Rate (RMR)

Fasted subjects relaxed in a reclined position for 30 minutes. Resting heart rate, resting energy expenditure (REE),V̇O2, and V̇CO2 were assessed using a metabolic cart (TrueMax 2400 Metabolic Cart, ParvoMedics Inc, USA).V̇O2 represents the rate of oxygen utilised by subjects during exercise, whereas V̇CO2  represents the rate of carbon dioxide exhaled. Subjects were advised not to sleep and breathe naturally during testing. The first 10 minutes of data collection were excluded from analysis to allow for subject stabilization.


## 2.4. Diet

Subjects in both exercise and control groups were advised to maintain their normal eating habits during the study. On their first and last visit to the laboratory subjects provided a 3-day diet inventory which was analyzed using diet analysis software (SERVE Nutrition Management Systems, Professional Edition, version 5, Australia).


## 2.5. Body Composition

A Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scan with a Lunar Prodigy scanner (software version 7.51, GE Corporation, USA) was used to measure body mass and percentage body fat. Fat mass (FM) along with FFM in kg was measured for the whole body. DEXA also provided information on abdominal and trunk fat, as indicators of central adiposity. Computerised tomography (CT) scans (Philips Gemini GXL 16, the Netherlands) were also used to measure abdominal and visceral fat distribution. Axial slices (3 × 10 mm) were performed through the abdomen at L2/L3 and L4/L5. Fat density of 0.9 mg/L was assumed [12], and it was automatically selected at any tissue between 150 to 50 Hounsfield Units (HU). Gemini software (GXL Host system) was used to analyse the CT images. Abdominal, visceral, and subcutaneous fat were determined at the levels of L2/L3 and L4/L5. BMI was calculated by dividing weight by height squared (kg m−2).


## 2.6. High-Intensity Intermittent Exercise Training

Subjects in the exercise group completed supervised exercise (8 s sprint, 12 s recovery) continuously throughout each 20-min session. The HIIE workload was set at 80–90% of each subject’s heart rate (HR) peak at a cadence between 120 and 130 r.p.m and recovery was set at the same amount of resistance but at a cadence of 40 r.p.m. Subjects were instructed to keep their exercise intensity at a level necessary to produce a HR between 80–90% of HR peak. As subjects adapted to HIIE training, workload was increased so HR stayed at the appropriate 80–90% HR peak level. HIIE was coordinated with a prerecorded compact disc counting down each sprint in a 3-2-1 manner. Subjects performed a 5-min warm-up and cool-down on the bike prior to and after each exercise session. All training cycling data included continuous recording of HR and r.p.m, whereas rating of perceived exertion [13] (RPE) was assessed at 5-min intervals.


## 2.7. Assays

Insulin was measured using commercially available ELISA immunoassay kits. The degree of enzymatic turnover of the substrate was determined by dual wavelength absorbance measurement at 450 and 620 nm (Dako K6219, Denmark). HOMA-IR, an insulin resistance index [14], was calculated as follows:(1)HOMA-IR=[fastinginsulin(μIU/mL)×fastingbloodglucose(mmol/L)]22.5.


## 2.8. Statistical Analysis

Data were analysed with the Statistical Package for Social Science for Windows software (SPSS 18, USA). To examine changes after the intervention, an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to evaluate differences between the two groups for variables that did not violate ANCOVA assumptions. Preintervention values were used as covariates. Where assumptions were violated, an independentt-test was conducted on the difference scores. The statistical analysis was considered significant when the probability level was less than 0.05.


## 3. Results

There was no significant difference between the two groups for body mass, BMI (Table1), and age prior to the training program.Table 1
Change in body composition, aerobic power, resting heart rate, RQ, resting energy expenditure, carbohydrate, and fat oxidation for the high-intensity intermittent exercise and no exercise control group (N=38; mean and standard error).
ExerciseControlPre*PostPre*PostWeight (kg)87.8±2.786.3±2.7**89 ± 2.989.4±3.1BMI (kg m−2)28.4±0.527.9±0.5**29 ± 0.929.1±0.9Waist circumference (cm)93.3±1.489.8±1.4**93.7±1.995.1±1.9Fat mass (kg)29.8±1.627.8±1.5**31.7±2.231.8±2.3% Fat mass34.8±1.132.8±1.1**36.3±1.436.0±1.5Fat-free mass (kg)54.3±1.555.5±1.4**53.8±1.354.2±1.3V̇O2peak (l min−1)3.0±0.13.4±0.1**2.6±0.12.7±0.1V̇O2peak (mL kg−1 min−1)34.2±1.039.4±0.8**29.1±1.330.6±1.4Work output (watts)246.3±8.1289.8±8.0**224.4±7.3225.9±6.3HR (bpm)62.2±2.557.9±1.8**62.7±2.063.7±1.7RQ0.85±0.010.83±0.01**0.82±0.020.86±0.01REE (Kcal/day)1793 ± 541841 ± 561788 ± 581794 ± 53Carbohydrate oxidation (g/day)232.6±14.3201.5±13.1**186.7±22.3252.1±21.2Fat oxidation (g/day)93.8±6.6106.1±6.5**110.2±10.082.0±10.9*Pre vales were used as covariates for ANCOVA.P<0.05**, change in exercise group significantly greater compared to that of control group. BMI: body mass index; REE: resting energy expenditure; HR: heart rate; RQ: respiratory quotient; REE: resting energy expenditure.


### 3.1. Exercise Heart Rates, RPE, and Work Load

The average HR during the HIIE training sessions for the exercise group was160±9beats min−1 which corresponded to 88% of HR peak and the average RPE was 13.6±0.5. Maximal work load significantly increased in the exercise group (P<0.001) by 43.5 watts (Table 1).


### 3.2. Response in Aerobic Power following the Intervention

HIIE resulted in a significant increase in both absolute and relativeV̇O2peak (P<0.005) with absolute V̇O2peak being increased by 13% and relative V̇O2peak by 15% (Table 1).


### 3.3. Total Body Mass and Body Fat Assessed by DEXA

Total body mass significantly decreased (P<0.005) in the exercise group (Table 1) by 1.5 kg (2%), whereas total FM significantly decreased (P<0.005) by 2.0 kg (6.7%; Figure 1). The FM of controls was unchanged after 12 weeks (Table 1). Percent body fat in exercisers at pretest was not correlated to changes in percent body fat after the intervention (r=0.17,P>0.05).Figure 1
Total fat change for the high-intensity intermittent exercise and no exercise control groups (N=38, mean and standard error). *Significantly different from control group (P<0.05).


### 3.4. Abdominal and Trunk Fat Assessed by DEXA

There was a significant decrease in abdominal fat by 0.14 kg (6.6%) for the exercise group (P<0.05) with no change for the control group (Table 2). The exercise group also significantly decreased (P<0.001) trunk fat by 1.4 kg (8.4%), whereas trunk fat was slightly increased in controls (Table 2).Table 2
Regional changes in body composition for the high-intensity intermittent exercise and no exercise control groups (N=38; mean and standard error).
Region of fat massExerciseControlPre*PostPre*PostLeg fat (kg)9.6±0.89.0±0.79.9±0.79.8±0.7Leg lean (kg)18.6±0.619.0±0.6**18.5±0.618.5±0.5Arm fat (kg)2.7±0.22.5±0.2**2.6±0.12.7±0.2Arm lean (kg)6.7±0.26.7±0.26.4±0.46.6±0.3Abdominal fat (kg)2.3±0.12.2±0.1**2.4±0.22.4±0.2Abdominal lean (kg)3.7±0.13.7±0.13.5±0.13.5±0.1Trunk fat (kg)17.0±0.915.5±0.9**17.2±1.217.3±1.3Trunk lean (kg)24.9±0.725.6±0.7**24.0±0.823.9±0.7*Prevalues were used as covariates for ANCOVA.P<0.05**, change significantly greater compared to that of control group.


### 3.5. Regional Body Composition Assessed by DEXA

There was no significant difference between groups in absolute FM loss in the leg (P>0.05), whereas arm FM loss was greater for exercisers (P<0.01; Table 2).Total, leg, and trunk FFM (P<0.05) were significantly increased after 12 weeks of HIIE in the exercise group compared to the control group, whereas arm FFM (P>0.05) showed no significant change after the intervention (Figure 2).Figure 2
Fat-free mass change for the high-intensity intermittent exercise groups (N=38; mean and standard error). *Significant difference between pre- and posttesting (P<0.05).


### 3.6. Abdominal, Visceral, and Subcutaneous Fat Mass Assessed by CT

Total, abdominal, visceral, and subcutaneous FM at levels of L2/L3 and L4/L5 were significantly reduced (P<0.05) after 12 weeks of HIIE compared to the control group (Table 3). Abdominal fat decreased by 8.5% at L2/L3 and 6.6% at L4/L5. Visceral fat was significantly decreased (P<0.05) by 17% at level L2/L3 and 10% at level L4/L5 (Table 3; Figure 3).Table 3
Changes in computed tomography scan variables for the high-intensity intermittent exercise and no exercise control groups (N=38; mean and standard error).
ExerciseControlPre*PostPre*PostL2/L3 total fat mass (g)564.0±22.3538.0±21.4**587.1±26.3591.0±30.6L2/L3 abdominal fat (g)280.0±21.4256.1±19.6**304.8±26.5311.9±30.6L2/L3 visceral fat (g)94.6±10.684.8±9.9**102.1±11.5101.5±11.4L2/L3 subcutaneous (g)177.3±16.3161.7±14.7**194.2±20.2200.4±23.4L4/L5 total fat mass (g)576.9±24.3555.7±21.7**595.7±28.4602.2±32.7L4/L5 abdominal fat (g)327.8±23.0306.3±20.9**346.5±27.3355.5±31.0L4/L5 visceral fat (g)62.6±6.251.8±5.1**69.7±9.767.3±8.4L4/L5 subcutaneous (g)259.7±22.1247.8±20.0**271.7±26.1281.7±27.7*Prevalues were used as covariates for ANCOVA.P<0.05**, change significantly greater compared to that of control.Figure 3
Visceral fat change for the high-intensity intermittent exercise and no exercise control groups (N=38; mean and standard error). *Significantly different from control group (P<0.05).


### 3.7. Change in Body Composition after 3, 6, and 9 Weeks

At weeks 3 and 6 there were no change in body mass and BMI, however, after 9 weeks body mass (P<0.005) and BMI (P<0.005) were significantly decreased. At the end of the trial, body mass and BMI were significantly decreased (P<0.001; Table 1), yet, at week 6, WC was significantly lower than that at baseline, from 93.3 to 90.7 cm (P<0.001). There was a further WC reduction from week 6 (90.7 cm) to week 12, (89.8 cm), which was not significant (P>0.05). Also the major reduction in visceral fat brought about by HIIE appears to have occurred within the first six weeks as reduction in waist circumference was significantly correlated (r=0.57, P<0.05) with reduction in visceral fat (L4/L5) at week six.


### 3.8. Response in Resting Metabolic Rate following the Intervention

After the intervention exercise subjects had significantly lower resting HR (P<0.01) and respiratory quotient (RQ; P<0.01) compared to subjects in the control group. There was no significant change in resting metabolic rate after the intervention (P>0.05), however, subjects in the exercise group had significantly higher (13%) fat oxidation (P<0.001) and lower carbohydrate oxidation (P<0.001) after the intervention compared to the control group (Table 1).


### 3.9. Response in Blood Variables following the Intervention

Fasting glucose, plasma insulin, glucose, HOMA-IR, and lipid levels were unchanged in the exercise compared to the control group (P>0.05). For exercisers and controls preintervention levels of insulin, glucose, HOMA-IR, total cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein (Table 4) were within the normal range for males of this age [15].Table 4
Glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, and lipid change for the high-intensity intermittent exercise and no exercise control groups (N=38; mean and standard error).
ExerciseControlPrePostPrePostGlucose (mmoL·l−1)4.86±0.144.97±0.104.91±0.144.91±0.14Insulin (μU·mL−1)6.98±0.666.72±0.638.67±0.908.29±0.67HOMA-IR1.51±0.151.47±0.141.90±0.241.82±0.17Total cholesterol (mmoL·l−1)4.18±0.253.97±0.244.59±0.214.36±0.18Triglycerides (mmoL·l−1)1.20±0.271.18±0.361.52±0.211.31±0.18High-density lipoprotein (mmoL·l−1)1.31±0.091.35±0.091.08±0.091.03±0.08Low-density lipoprotein (mmoL·l−1)2.51±0.162.35±0.182.82±0.182.81±0.16Very low-density lipoprotein (mmoL·l−1)0.48±0.070.43±0.100.66±0.090.56±0.09TC: HDL ratio3.51±0.322.99±0.204.62±0.314.52±0.27


### 3.10. Diet

There was no significant change in macro- or micronutrient content before or after the intervention for the 3-day diet diary of the exercise or control group. Macronutrient levels before and after the 12-week intervention are shown in Table5.Table 5
Macronutrient levels before and after the 12-week-intervention (N=38; mean and standard error).
ExerciseControlPrePostPrePostKilojoules8102 ± 4288142 ± 4148569 ± 3438642 ± 343% carbohydrate43.6±1.842.9±1.546.2±1.846.8±1.9% protein19.8±1.119.5±1.118.2±1.118.3±1.5% fat36.4±1.737.5±1.435.7±1.734.9±1.4% saturated fat13.2±0.813.0±0.712.4±0.711.3±0.6% monounsaturated fat13.6±0.714.2±0.713.6±0.713.8±0.7% polyunsaturated fat6.3±0.67.0±0.76.3±0.66.5±0.7Cholesterol (mg)397.3±37.5394.7±41.9304.8±41.6381.8±57.0Fibre (g)19.5±2.519.5±2.420.3±2.421.4±2.8Sodium (mg)2564 ± 3202709 ± 3352390 ± 3452547 ± 335


## 3.1. Exercise Heart Rates, RPE, and Work Load

The average HR during the HIIE training sessions for the exercise group was160±9beats min−1 which corresponded to 88% of HR peak and the average RPE was 13.6±0.5. Maximal work load significantly increased in the exercise group (P<0.001) by 43.5 watts (Table 1).


## 3.2. Response in Aerobic Power following the Intervention

HIIE resulted in a significant increase in both absolute and relativeV̇O2peak (P<0.005) with absolute V̇O2peak being increased by 13% and relative V̇O2peak by 15% (Table 1).


## 3.3. Total Body Mass and Body Fat Assessed by DEXA

Total body mass significantly decreased (P<0.005) in the exercise group (Table 1) by 1.5 kg (2%), whereas total FM significantly decreased (P<0.005) by 2.0 kg (6.7%; Figure 1). The FM of controls was unchanged after 12 weeks (Table 1). Percent body fat in exercisers at pretest was not correlated to changes in percent body fat after the intervention (r=0.17,P>0.05).Figure 1
Total fat change for the high-intensity intermittent exercise and no exercise control groups (N=38, mean and standard error). *Significantly different from control group (P<0.05).


## 3.4. Abdominal and Trunk Fat Assessed by DEXA

There was a significant decrease in abdominal fat by 0.14 kg (6.6%) for the exercise group (P<0.05) with no change for the control group (Table 2). The exercise group also significantly decreased (P<0.001) trunk fat by 1.4 kg (8.4%), whereas trunk fat was slightly increased in controls (Table 2).Table 2
Regional changes in body composition for the high-intensity intermittent exercise and no exercise control groups (N=38; mean and standard error).
Region of fat massExerciseControlPre*PostPre*PostLeg fat (kg)9.6±0.89.0±0.79.9±0.79.8±0.7Leg lean (kg)18.6±0.619.0±0.6**18.5±0.618.5±0.5Arm fat (kg)2.7±0.22.5±0.2**2.6±0.12.7±0.2Arm lean (kg)6.7±0.26.7±0.26.4±0.46.6±0.3Abdominal fat (kg)2.3±0.12.2±0.1**2.4±0.22.4±0.2Abdominal lean (kg)3.7±0.13.7±0.13.5±0.13.5±0.1Trunk fat (kg)17.0±0.915.5±0.9**17.2±1.217.3±1.3Trunk lean (kg)24.9±0.725.6±0.7**24.0±0.823.9±0.7*Prevalues were used as covariates for ANCOVA.P<0.05**, change significantly greater compared to that of control group.


## 3.5. Regional Body Composition Assessed by DEXA

There was no significant difference between groups in absolute FM loss in the leg (P>0.05), whereas arm FM loss was greater for exercisers (P<0.01; Table 2).Total, leg, and trunk FFM (P<0.05) were significantly increased after 12 weeks of HIIE in the exercise group compared to the control group, whereas arm FFM (P>0.05) showed no significant change after the intervention (Figure 2).Figure 2
Fat-free mass change for the high-intensity intermittent exercise groups (N=38; mean and standard error). *Significant difference between pre- and posttesting (P<0.05).


## 3.6. Abdominal, Visceral, and Subcutaneous Fat Mass Assessed by CT

Total, abdominal, visceral, and subcutaneous FM at levels of L2/L3 and L4/L5 were significantly reduced (P<0.05) after 12 weeks of HIIE compared to the control group (Table 3). Abdominal fat decreased by 8.5% at L2/L3 and 6.6% at L4/L5. Visceral fat was significantly decreased (P<0.05) by 17% at level L2/L3 and 10% at level L4/L5 (Table 3; Figure 3).Table 3
Changes in computed tomography scan variables for the high-intensity intermittent exercise and no exercise control groups (N=38; mean and standard error).
ExerciseControlPre*PostPre*PostL2/L3 total fat mass (g)564.0±22.3538.0±21.4**587.1±26.3591.0±30.6L2/L3 abdominal fat (g)280.0±21.4256.1±19.6**304.8±26.5311.9±30.6L2/L3 visceral fat (g)94.6±10.684.8±9.9**102.1±11.5101.5±11.4L2/L3 subcutaneous (g)177.3±16.3161.7±14.7**194.2±20.2200.4±23.4L4/L5 total fat mass (g)576.9±24.3555.7±21.7**595.7±28.4602.2±32.7L4/L5 abdominal fat (g)327.8±23.0306.3±20.9**346.5±27.3355.5±31.0L4/L5 visceral fat (g)62.6±6.251.8±5.1**69.7±9.767.3±8.4L4/L5 subcutaneous (g)259.7±22.1247.8±20.0**271.7±26.1281.7±27.7*Prevalues were used as covariates for ANCOVA.P<0.05**, change significantly greater compared to that of control.Figure 3
Visceral fat change for the high-intensity intermittent exercise and no exercise control groups (N=38; mean and standard error). *Significantly different from control group (P<0.05).


## 3.7. Change in Body Composition after 3, 6, and 9 Weeks

At weeks 3 and 6 there were no change in body mass and BMI, however, after 9 weeks body mass (P<0.005) and BMI (P<0.005) were significantly decreased. At the end of the trial, body mass and BMI were significantly decreased (P<0.001; Table 1), yet, at week 6, WC was significantly lower than that at baseline, from 93.3 to 90.7 cm (P<0.001). There was a further WC reduction from week 6 (90.7 cm) to week 12, (89.8 cm), which was not significant (P>0.05). Also the major reduction in visceral fat brought about by HIIE appears to have occurred within the first six weeks as reduction in waist circumference was significantly correlated (r=0.57, P<0.05) with reduction in visceral fat (L4/L5) at week six.


## 3.8. Response in Resting Metabolic Rate following the Intervention

After the intervention exercise subjects had significantly lower resting HR (P<0.01) and respiratory quotient (RQ; P<0.01) compared to subjects in the control group. There was no significant change in resting metabolic rate after the intervention (P>0.05), however, subjects in the exercise group had significantly higher (13%) fat oxidation (P<0.001) and lower carbohydrate oxidation (P<0.001) after the intervention compared to the control group (Table 1).


## 3.9. Response in Blood Variables following the Intervention

Fasting glucose, plasma insulin, glucose, HOMA-IR, and lipid levels were unchanged in the exercise compared to the control group (P>0.05). For exercisers and controls preintervention levels of insulin, glucose, HOMA-IR, total cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein (Table 4) were within the normal range for males of this age [15].Table 4
Glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, and lipid change for the high-intensity intermittent exercise and no exercise control groups (N=38; mean and standard error).
ExerciseControlPrePostPrePostGlucose (mmoL·l−1)4.86±0.144.97±0.104.91±0.144.91±0.14Insulin (μU·mL−1)6.98±0.666.72±0.638.67±0.908.29±0.67HOMA-IR1.51±0.151.47±0.141.90±0.241.82±0.17Total cholesterol (mmoL·l−1)4.18±0.253.97±0.244.59±0.214.36±0.18Triglycerides (mmoL·l−1)1.20±0.271.18±0.361.52±0.211.31±0.18High-density lipoprotein (mmoL·l−1)1.31±0.091.35±0.091.08±0.091.03±0.08Low-density lipoprotein (mmoL·l−1)2.51±0.162.35±0.182.82±0.182.81±0.16Very low-density lipoprotein (mmoL·l−1)0.48±0.070.43±0.100.66±0.090.56±0.09TC: HDL ratio3.51±0.322.99±0.204.62±0.314.52±0.27


## 3.10. Diet

There was no significant change in macro- or micronutrient content before or after the intervention for the 3-day diet diary of the exercise or control group. Macronutrient levels before and after the 12-week intervention are shown in Table5.Table 5
Macronutrient levels before and after the 12-week-intervention (N=38; mean and standard error).
ExerciseControlPrePostPrePostKilojoules8102 ± 4288142 ± 4148569 ± 3438642 ± 343% carbohydrate43.6±1.842.9±1.546.2±1.846.8±1.9% protein19.8±1.119.5±1.118.2±1.118.3±1.5% fat36.4±1.737.5±1.435.7±1.734.9±1.4% saturated fat13.2±0.813.0±0.712.4±0.711.3±0.6% monounsaturated fat13.6±0.714.2±0.713.6±0.713.8±0.7% polyunsaturated fat6.3±0.67.0±0.76.3±0.66.5±0.7Cholesterol (mg)397.3±37.5394.7±41.9304.8±41.6381.8±57.0Fibre (g)19.5±2.519.5±2.420.3±2.421.4±2.8Sodium (mg)2564 ± 3202709 ± 3352390 ± 3452547 ± 335


## 4. Discussion

The major findings of this study were that HIIE significantly increasedV̇O2peak and significantly reduced total, abdominal, trunk, and visceral fat of young, overweight males. Also trunk and leg fat-free mass was significantly increased after HIIE.The 15% increase inV̇O2max is similar to results of a previous study that used a 8 s/12 s HIIE protocol [8]. Talanian et al. [16] also found that a HIIE program significantly elevated aerobic power. In this paper the oxidative enzyme β-hydroxy-acyl-CoA dehydrogenase was used as a marker of mitochondrial volume and showed that intermittent sprinting enhances mitochondrial capacity. Different forms of HIIE have also been shown to significantly increase aerobic power [17, 18]. Thus, collectively these data show that HIIE results in significant improvements in aerobic fitness. The improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness after HIIE is an attractive feature of this mode of exercise as aerobic fitness has been shown to be an important predictor of positive health [19].That HIIE resulted in significant subcutaneous fat reduction supports prior research in women using a similar protocol [8]. Results of the present study with males extend these findings showing that HIIE is an effective and efficient way of controlling body composition in both genders. With regard to abdominal fat, it has been found that 15 weeks of HIIE led to significantly reduced abdominal fat (0.15 kg) in untrained young women [8]. The 0.13 kg decrease in abdominal fat and 1.5 kg decrease in trunk fat found in the current study demonstrates that this effect is also present in young males and supports findings by Boudou et al. [10] who showed that 8 weeks of HIIE significantly reduced abdominal adiposity in older diabetic males.The significant 17% decrease in visceral fat found in the present study extends the findings of Mourier et al. [20] who showed a significant reduction in visceral fat measured by MRI, following an exercise regimen consisting of steady-state exercise and HIIE for 8 weeks. These findings also add to the results of studies that have shown that aerobic training interventions decrease visceral adipose tissue [21]. The present study, however, appears to be the first to examine the effects of 20 min bouts of HIIE on visceral fat of young males. As visceral compared to overall obesity is more strongly associated with cardiovascular disease risk [22] the ability of HIIE to reduce visceral fat may have positive health implications. For example, it was shown that reduction in visceral fat was associated with improvement in glucose and lipid metabolism, [3] whereas Okauchi et al. [23] found that a reduction in visceral fat lowered the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Interestingly, Ohkawara et al. [21] estimated the optimal dose of aerobic exercise necessary to significantly reduce visceral fat and concluded that 3,780 kcal expended per week was needed. As an exercise session (e.g., cycling on a stationary cycle ergometer) lasting around an hour at a moderate exercise intensity expends about 520–550 kcal then to reach an optimal exercise caloric expenditure of 3,780 kcal per week an individual would have to perform approximately seven one-hour exercise sessions per week. In contrast, subjects in the present study exercised for only one hour per week. Also Donnelly et al. [24] conducted 16 months, 5 hours of aerobic exercise per week program with overweight young males and recorded a 23% decrease in visceral fat. Thus, it appears HIIE can bring about significant decreases in visceral fat with programs that are both significantly shorter in length (e.g., 16 months versus 3 months) and have less exercise commitment per week (5 hours versus 1 hour). Also the major decrease in visceral fat brought about by HIIE may have occurred within the first six weeks as reduction in visceral fat was correlated with reduction in waist circumference (r=0.57, P<0.05) at week six after which waist circumference did not further decrease.Although the effect of HIIE on FFM has not been extensively examined, one study using DEXA found that trunk muscle mass was significantly increased in young females by 0.6 kg after 15 weeks of HIIE, [8] whereas another study using MRI showed a significant increase in thigh muscle cross sectional area of older males and females after HIIE [10]. The 1.2 kg increase in total FFM found after HIIE in the present study confirms the ability of this type of exercise to increase FFM. However, the length of this 12-week intervention was 3 weeks less than that conducted by Trapp et al. [8] that used females as subjects. As exercise HRs and relative exercise intensity of the two trials were similar it appears that males responded with a similar decrease in total fat but a greater increase in FFM after HIIE. FFM increase in the trunk after HIIE was 0.7 kg for males and 0.4 kg for females, whereas in the legs was 0.4 kg for males and 0.1 kg for females. Thus, males compared to females recorded greater increases in FFM in the trunk and legs. This characteristic may be important for fat loss programs as it has been shown that muscle mass is typically decreased after dietary restriction [25] and is typically unchanged after aerobic exercise training [9]. The significant increase in leg FFM may also reflect important metabolic adaptations resulting in enhanced insulin sensitivity [26].Possible mechanisms underlying the HIIE-induced fat loss effect are undetermined but may include enhanced exercise and postexercise fat oxidation and suppressed postexercise appetite [7]. For example, Burgomaster et al. [26] and Talanian et al. [16] have shown that 6 to 7 sessions of HIIE had significant increases in whole body and skeletal muscle capacity for fatty acid oxidation. The excess postexercise oxygen consumption response to HIIE does not appear to have been examined, however, it is feasible that the significant levels of catecholamines generated during acute HIIE [27] could elevate postexercise fat oxidation. The significant catecholamine response to HIIE is in contrast to moderate, steady-state aerobic exercise that results in small increases in epinephrine and norepinephrine [28]. Also the high levels of catecholamines produced by HIIE may underlie its ability to reduce visceral fat, as catecholamines have been shown to drive lipolysis and are mainly responsible for fat release from visceral fat stores [29]. Also significantly, more β-adrenergic receptors have been found in visceral compared to subcutaneous fat [30] suggesting thatHIIE may have greater potential than steady-state exercise (e.g., jogging, cycling) to reduce visceral fat. Furthermore, increased fat oxidation after HIIE may occur as a result of the need to remove lactate and H+ and to resynthesize glycogen. Uncoupled respiration, protein turnover, and sympathetic nervous system activity may also contribute to increased energy expenditure and fat oxidation after exercise [9]. Finally, HIIE may also have a suppressive effect on appetite as exposing rats to hard exercise has been repeatedly reported to reduce food intake [31].As this HIIE program required minimal time commitment, it has implications regarding subject compliance with exercise interventions. Thus, physical activity prescriptions, which require the least effort, while still producing adequate reductions in subcutaneous and visceral fat are likely to be optimal [9] and HIIE would seem to fall under this category as subject’s total exercise commitment was 60 min per week. In conclusion, 20 min of HIIE, performed three times per week for 12 weeks, resulted in significant reductions in total body, abdominal, trunk, and visceral fat and a significant increase in fat-free mass of overweight young males.



---

*Source: 480467-2012-06-06.xml*