# Analysis of Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities ofChenopodium ambrosioides: An Ethnomedicinal Plant

Authors: Muhammad Ajaib; Tanveer Hussain; Saleha Farooq; Mehrban Ashiq
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

The antimicrobial and antioxidant potential ofChenopodium ambrosioidesL. was explored. Antimicrobial potential was investigated through zone of inhibition and minimum inhibition concentration whereas antioxidant potential of selected plant was evaluated through different techniques, that is, total phenolic contents, total flavonoids content, DPPH assay, ABTS assay, and metal chelating. It is concluded that both parts showed good to satisfactory antimicrobial and antioxidant results. The maximum antibacterial potential is exhibited by bark macerated in petroleum ether againstBacillus subtilis (33
±
1.5 mm) and maximum antifungal potential exhibited by methanol extracts of fruit againstAspergillus niger (16
±
1.5 mm). Aqueous extracts failed to show any activity against selected organisms. The minimum (significant) MIC value exhibited by fruit extract againstStaphylococcus aureus was 0.009
±
0.02 at 0.7 mg/mL. Aqueous extracts of bark and fruit exhibited maximum antioxidant potential in all assays except DPPH assay. Petroleum ether bark extract showed maximum % DPPH value.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Plant constituents have broad spectrum in provision of their biological properties and structure and become a source of active natural products. Many disorders such as cancer and cardiovascular diseases are prevented by plants beverages, fruits, and vegetables because they are rich in natural antioxidant compounds. Numerous compounds are present in plants which have diverse mechanism of action that includes some enzymes, protein, and secondary metabolites, for example, carotenoids, vitamins, flavonoids, anthocyanins, and other phenolic components which is the foundation of antioxidant and antimicrobial potential of plant products [1].In mitochondria, through xanthene oxidase activity and liver mixed function, free radicals are produced as a result of the normal metabolic process and also free radical chain reactions usually occurring as respiratory chain reaction. Moreover, in different circumstances chemical mobilization of the fat stores, for example, lactation, exercise, fever, and infection and yet fasting may result in improved radical activity and damage. If the basic mechanism causes numerous human neurologic and many other disorders, then oxidative injury comes forward. Peroxidation of lipids can be initiated by the oxygen free radical, which in turn stimulates the glycation of protein, inactivation of some enzymes, and modification in the function and structure of collagen basement and a few other membranes, and also play a role in chronic impediment of diabetes [2].Plant species and numerous herbs were examined and their antioxidant potential was evaluated. It is reported that antioxidant potential is due to some new compounds, that is, flavonoids, coumarins, lignins, anthocyanins, and catechins in plants. The drugs which contain amount of antioxidant compounds are being used for the cure of complex diseases such as diabetes, stroke, atherosclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, and cancer [3].Chenopodium ambrosioides L. which is a selected plant belongs to family Chenopodiaceae having 103 genera and about 1300 species worldwide. In Pakistan, Chenopodiaceae family consisted of 35 genera and 106 species. The distribution of these genera is mainly in desert and semidesert and along sea shores [4].Chenopodium ambrosioides L. is strongly aromatic, annual to short lived perennial with erect ascending stem (Figure 1). Leaves ofChenopodium ambrosioidesplants are morphologically elliptical and lanceolated. Seeds mostly are horizontal, sometimes oblique, and brown. It is probably originated from tropical America. It is earlier cultivated as medicinal plant and introduced in tropical and subtropical areas of the world, where it is commonly naturalized [5].C. ambrosioidesis an important ethnobotanical plant locally called Gandi Buti in Kotli District and is used as anthelmintic wound healing and constipation (Figure 9) [6].Figure 1
Chenopodium ambrosioides.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Plant Material

The plantChenopodium ambrosioidesL. commonly known as Gandi Buti or Jangli Bhang is collected from Kotli District, Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK). The plant material was acknowledged with the valid voucher no. GC. Herb. Bot. 2944 and deposited to the Dr. Sultan Ahmed Herbarium, Department of Botany, GC University Lahore.


### 2.2. Test Organisms

The bacterial test organisms selected for estimation, that is,Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa,andBacillus subtilis,were attained from the Department of Pathology, Postgraduate Medical Institute, Lahore, for investigation of antibacterial potential ofChenopodium ambrosioidesL.Fungal strainsAspergillus niger andAspergillus oryzae chosen for the examination of antifungal potential were attained from the Institute of Industrial Biotechnology and Microbiology, GC University Lahore.The antibiotic standard discs (azithromycin, amoxicillin, ampicillin, and amikacin) and antifungal standard discs (nystatin, tezole, fungivin, and griseofulvin) were consumed to find out receptiveness of microbial specimens.


### 2.3. Methodology Adopted

The plant specimenChenopodium ambrosioides L. primarily is dispersed into its parts, that is, bark and fruit, and then shade dried for 20–30 days at room temperature. Finally, desiccated plant material was crushed and macerated.


#### 2.3.1. Maceration of the Plant Specimen

During static state maceration, quantity of crumbled plant precisely was weighed and referred to impenetrable glass jar and was consistently dipped in respective solvent and positioned aside with continuous agitation at room temperature for interval of 8 days. Subsequently, after the achievement of the time, the constituents who are present in glass jar were subjected to filtration by means of filter paper. The extract of plant material was preserved in glass vial; solid filtrate was dried out for about 20 minutes and similar procedure was used for other solvents. The solvents which were used for maceration include petroleum ether (PE), chloroform (Chl.), methanol (MeOH), and water (Aq.). The maceration scheduled from nonpolar to polar solvent and solvents was applied with their polarity gradients. Ultimately, extracts were concentrated and dehydrated by means of rotary evaporator as well as lyophilized concentrated extract which is obtained and stored at 20°C.The physical analysis of plant extracts considered its colour, appearance, and texture and percentage (%) yield before further scrutiny was conducted. The percentage (%) yield was calculated by using the formula which is given below:(1)Percentage%Extraction  yield=Wt.ofplantextractWt.ofinitialplantsample×100.


### 2.4. Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity

Antimicrobial potential ofChenopodium ambrosioides L. was estimated by taking into consideration the following methodology.


#### 2.4.1. Preparation of Plant Sample

Collected plant samples were weighed as to take 0.2 g and convert it into a glass vial and make final volume up to 20 mL through the subsequent solvent. The glass vials have concentration of mg/mL and are preserved at 20°C.


#### 2.4.2. Preparation of Medium

Investigation of antimicrobial potential of the plant macerates was carried out through gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria which are cultured on the nutrient broth agar medium. The medium was prepared according to Cruick-Shank et al. [7]. The fungal specimens are cultured on PDA medium applied by Johansen [8].


#### 2.4.3. Preparation of Medium Plates

15–20 mL of medium was poured to every petri plate and medium containing plates covers were placed at particular position and preserved with the cling film and were stored in the uncontaminated location at room temperature until consumption.


### 2.5. Preparation of Inoculums

#### 2.5.1. For Bacterial Strains

20 mL of sterilized nutrient broth poured into test tube and bacterial strains were put into it under aseptic conditions. Subsequent to inoculums grounding, the test tubes were positioned in the incubator for 24 hours at 35 ± 2°C and labeled properly.


#### 2.5.2. For Fungal Strains

Petri plate containing potato dextrose agar medium was streaked with the fungal strains under aseptic conditions. After that, petri plates having inoculums were sealed with cling film positioned in the incubator for 48 hours at 25 ± 2°C and labeled properly.


### 2.6. Adjusting the Turbidity of the Inoculums

#### 2.6.1. For Bacterial Inoculums

With the help of 0.5 barium chloride McFarland turbidity standard, we accustomed the turbidity of bacterial inoculum to 1.5 × 108 colony forming units (CFU)/mL.


#### 2.6.2. For Fungal Inoculums

In order to sustain the turbidity of inoculums, 4-5 colonies from the 48-hour fungal culture dish were subjected to 10 mL saline solution, that is, 0.9% NaCl solution, and its consistency was homogenized by employing 0.5 McFarland density standard. For fungal samples the density should be within the series of 1 × 103 to 5 × 103 CFU/mL.


### 2.7. Agar Well Diffusion Method

The agar well diffusion method betrothed for the investigation during the examination was customized by W. M. M. Kirby and his coworkers in 1956 at the University Of Washington School Of Medicine. Firstly, spread the inoculum evenly on the surface of solidified medium by means of autoclaved cotton swab in every direction. Ultimately, cork borer no. 4 is subjected to grounding of well in the middle of petri plate having medium and plant macerate was added in the hole with the help of dropper or pipette. The petri plates were sealed with cling film.Label the plate and this process is repeated three times because of observation recorded in triplicate for accurate readings. When purpose is to record antibacterial potential, then the plates were positioned in incubator for 24 hours at37
±
2°C whereas, in the condition of evaluation of antifungal potential, the plates were positioned for 48 hours at 25
±
2°C and solvents employed for maceration process utilized as negative control.


#### 2.7.1. Measurement of Zone of Inhibition

Dimension of zone was estimated through measuring the diameter of zone via ruler or Vernier caliper which was produced as a result of restricting the growth of microbes around plant macerate. The back side of petri plate was apprehended few inches left and to authenticate the readings the diameter was noted. Growth extended from disk to margin was estimated as a zone having length of 0 mm.


#### 2.7.2. Estimation of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

For the estimation of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), the methanolic extracts ofChenopodium ambrosioides L. including bark and fruit were utilized.


### 2.8. Preparation of Plant Sample

The different concentrations of plant macerate were practiced for MIC that was 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100 mg/mL.


#### 2.8.1. MIC Assay

The MIC appraisal was followed as reported Murray et al. [9] with slightly altering this technique. According to this technique, two series of test tubes were made. Each series has 10 test tubes. Dilution of plant extracts ranges from 10 to 100 mg/mL for a single antimicrobial strain. One test tube series was labeled as control whereas other series of test tubes was labeled for the experimental intentions. Then 1 μL microbial suspension, 1 μL stock plant dilution, 2.5 μL medium (nutrient broth for bacteria and malt extract for fungi), and 3 mL of sterilized water were put in tubes. In the same way, all the series of the test tubes were sustained. Amount of medium and inoculum which was prepared remains constant while changing the concentration of plant extracts and water also poured in same quantity.The test tubes which were prepared are positioned in the incubator at 37 ± 2°C for 24 hours while in the case of antifungal potential they were incubated at 25 ± 2°C for 48 hours; readings were noted via spectrophotometer at the 595 nm absorbance.


### 2.9. Estimation of Antioxidant Activity

Following techniques were used for the estimation antioxidant potential ofChenopodium ambrosioides L.


#### 2.9.1. Estimation of Total Flavonoid Contents (TFC)

Determination of total flavonoids contents of plant fractions was reported by Dewanto et al. [10]. We measured 250 μL (500 μg/mL) plant dilution, 1250 μL distilled water, and 75 μL (5%) NaNO2 that then were transferred into the test tubes. These test tubes were put in incubator for 5 minutes. Afterward, 150 μL 10% AlCl3 was added subsequent to the addition of 500 μL. 1 M NaOH. Wait for 6 minutes and then add 275 μL sterilized water and raise the final volume up to 2.5 mL. Through spectrophotometer, estimation of the flavonoid content was determined at 510 nm.


#### 2.9.2. Estimation of Total Phenolic Contents (TPC)

Makkar et al. (1993) [11] proposed the procedure for investigation of total phenolic contents. Weigh 100 μg/mL plant extract, 2.8 mL of 10% Na2CO3, and 0.1 mL of 2 N FC reagent transferred to test tube after being incubated at room temperature for 40 minutes and absorbance was calculated at 725 nm.


#### 2.9.3. DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity

Precisely 1000μL of plant dilution poured into test tube was measured and mixed with 2.5 mL of DPPH solution which was freshly prepared. The solution which is formed was shaken and permissible to stand at room temperature for 45–60 minutes. After the incubation, DPPH reduced the solution and the changing of colour takes place. The colour was changed from purple to yellow which revealed that the end point of reaction has been reached. After that, the absorbance of solution was noted at the 515 nm wavelength via spectrophotometer.


#### 2.9.4. Metal Chelating Activity

Dinis et al. [12] proposed the method for calculating the capacity of plant macerate to chelate iron. Then we measured plant material (100 μL), FeSO4 (50 μL), and 200 μL ferrozine. The mixture was shaken and volume was raised up to 4 mL with ethanol solution. Dynamically shake the mixture. The mixture kept at room temperature for 10 minutes and at 562 nm wavelength its values were noted through spectrophotometer.


#### 2.9.5. ABTS+ Assay

Miller and Rice (1993) firstly developed the ABTS
∙
+ assay and further improvement was made by Re et al. [13]. The evaluation of antioxidant potential of ABTS
∙
+ assay was done as proposed by Re et al. (1991). Absorbance of ABTS
∙
+ solution was adjusted to 0.68–0.72 at 734 nm by the addition of PBS buffer and as A
0 (absorbance of control). For the estimation of antioxidant activity, 2990 μL of ABTS
∙
+ solution was added in 10 μL of plant sample in reaction tube, followed by the shaking of mixture, and the change was noted in absorbance after every 1-minute interval for 8 minutes.


### 2.10. Statistical Analysis of Assessment

All parameters were carried out in the form of triplicates and findings attained were analyzed statistically to conclude the considerable value of analysis.


## 2.1. Plant Material

The plantChenopodium ambrosioidesL. commonly known as Gandi Buti or Jangli Bhang is collected from Kotli District, Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK). The plant material was acknowledged with the valid voucher no. GC. Herb. Bot. 2944 and deposited to the Dr. Sultan Ahmed Herbarium, Department of Botany, GC University Lahore.


## 2.2. Test Organisms

The bacterial test organisms selected for estimation, that is,Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa,andBacillus subtilis,were attained from the Department of Pathology, Postgraduate Medical Institute, Lahore, for investigation of antibacterial potential ofChenopodium ambrosioidesL.Fungal strainsAspergillus niger andAspergillus oryzae chosen for the examination of antifungal potential were attained from the Institute of Industrial Biotechnology and Microbiology, GC University Lahore.The antibiotic standard discs (azithromycin, amoxicillin, ampicillin, and amikacin) and antifungal standard discs (nystatin, tezole, fungivin, and griseofulvin) were consumed to find out receptiveness of microbial specimens.


## 2.3. Methodology Adopted

The plant specimenChenopodium ambrosioides L. primarily is dispersed into its parts, that is, bark and fruit, and then shade dried for 20–30 days at room temperature. Finally, desiccated plant material was crushed and macerated.


### 2.3.1. Maceration of the Plant Specimen

During static state maceration, quantity of crumbled plant precisely was weighed and referred to impenetrable glass jar and was consistently dipped in respective solvent and positioned aside with continuous agitation at room temperature for interval of 8 days. Subsequently, after the achievement of the time, the constituents who are present in glass jar were subjected to filtration by means of filter paper. The extract of plant material was preserved in glass vial; solid filtrate was dried out for about 20 minutes and similar procedure was used for other solvents. The solvents which were used for maceration include petroleum ether (PE), chloroform (Chl.), methanol (MeOH), and water (Aq.). The maceration scheduled from nonpolar to polar solvent and solvents was applied with their polarity gradients. Ultimately, extracts were concentrated and dehydrated by means of rotary evaporator as well as lyophilized concentrated extract which is obtained and stored at 20°C.The physical analysis of plant extracts considered its colour, appearance, and texture and percentage (%) yield before further scrutiny was conducted. The percentage (%) yield was calculated by using the formula which is given below:(1)Percentage%Extraction  yield=Wt.ofplantextractWt.ofinitialplantsample×100.


## 2.3.1. Maceration of the Plant Specimen

During static state maceration, quantity of crumbled plant precisely was weighed and referred to impenetrable glass jar and was consistently dipped in respective solvent and positioned aside with continuous agitation at room temperature for interval of 8 days. Subsequently, after the achievement of the time, the constituents who are present in glass jar were subjected to filtration by means of filter paper. The extract of plant material was preserved in glass vial; solid filtrate was dried out for about 20 minutes and similar procedure was used for other solvents. The solvents which were used for maceration include petroleum ether (PE), chloroform (Chl.), methanol (MeOH), and water (Aq.). The maceration scheduled from nonpolar to polar solvent and solvents was applied with their polarity gradients. Ultimately, extracts were concentrated and dehydrated by means of rotary evaporator as well as lyophilized concentrated extract which is obtained and stored at 20°C.The physical analysis of plant extracts considered its colour, appearance, and texture and percentage (%) yield before further scrutiny was conducted. The percentage (%) yield was calculated by using the formula which is given below:(1)Percentage%Extraction  yield=Wt.ofplantextractWt.ofinitialplantsample×100.


## 2.4. Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity

Antimicrobial potential ofChenopodium ambrosioides L. was estimated by taking into consideration the following methodology.


### 2.4.1. Preparation of Plant Sample

Collected plant samples were weighed as to take 0.2 g and convert it into a glass vial and make final volume up to 20 mL through the subsequent solvent. The glass vials have concentration of mg/mL and are preserved at 20°C.


### 2.4.2. Preparation of Medium

Investigation of antimicrobial potential of the plant macerates was carried out through gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria which are cultured on the nutrient broth agar medium. The medium was prepared according to Cruick-Shank et al. [7]. The fungal specimens are cultured on PDA medium applied by Johansen [8].


### 2.4.3. Preparation of Medium Plates

15–20 mL of medium was poured to every petri plate and medium containing plates covers were placed at particular position and preserved with the cling film and were stored in the uncontaminated location at room temperature until consumption.


## 2.4.1. Preparation of Plant Sample

Collected plant samples were weighed as to take 0.2 g and convert it into a glass vial and make final volume up to 20 mL through the subsequent solvent. The glass vials have concentration of mg/mL and are preserved at 20°C.


## 2.4.2. Preparation of Medium

Investigation of antimicrobial potential of the plant macerates was carried out through gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria which are cultured on the nutrient broth agar medium. The medium was prepared according to Cruick-Shank et al. [7]. The fungal specimens are cultured on PDA medium applied by Johansen [8].


## 2.4.3. Preparation of Medium Plates

15–20 mL of medium was poured to every petri plate and medium containing plates covers were placed at particular position and preserved with the cling film and were stored in the uncontaminated location at room temperature until consumption.


## 2.5. Preparation of Inoculums

### 2.5.1. For Bacterial Strains

20 mL of sterilized nutrient broth poured into test tube and bacterial strains were put into it under aseptic conditions. Subsequent to inoculums grounding, the test tubes were positioned in the incubator for 24 hours at 35 ± 2°C and labeled properly.


### 2.5.2. For Fungal Strains

Petri plate containing potato dextrose agar medium was streaked with the fungal strains under aseptic conditions. After that, petri plates having inoculums were sealed with cling film positioned in the incubator for 48 hours at 25 ± 2°C and labeled properly.


## 2.5.1. For Bacterial Strains

20 mL of sterilized nutrient broth poured into test tube and bacterial strains were put into it under aseptic conditions. Subsequent to inoculums grounding, the test tubes were positioned in the incubator for 24 hours at 35 ± 2°C and labeled properly.


## 2.5.2. For Fungal Strains

Petri plate containing potato dextrose agar medium was streaked with the fungal strains under aseptic conditions. After that, petri plates having inoculums were sealed with cling film positioned in the incubator for 48 hours at 25 ± 2°C and labeled properly.


## 2.6. Adjusting the Turbidity of the Inoculums

### 2.6.1. For Bacterial Inoculums

With the help of 0.5 barium chloride McFarland turbidity standard, we accustomed the turbidity of bacterial inoculum to 1.5 × 108 colony forming units (CFU)/mL.


### 2.6.2. For Fungal Inoculums

In order to sustain the turbidity of inoculums, 4-5 colonies from the 48-hour fungal culture dish were subjected to 10 mL saline solution, that is, 0.9% NaCl solution, and its consistency was homogenized by employing 0.5 McFarland density standard. For fungal samples the density should be within the series of 1 × 103 to 5 × 103 CFU/mL.


## 2.6.1. For Bacterial Inoculums

With the help of 0.5 barium chloride McFarland turbidity standard, we accustomed the turbidity of bacterial inoculum to 1.5 × 108 colony forming units (CFU)/mL.


## 2.6.2. For Fungal Inoculums

In order to sustain the turbidity of inoculums, 4-5 colonies from the 48-hour fungal culture dish were subjected to 10 mL saline solution, that is, 0.9% NaCl solution, and its consistency was homogenized by employing 0.5 McFarland density standard. For fungal samples the density should be within the series of 1 × 103 to 5 × 103 CFU/mL.


## 2.7. Agar Well Diffusion Method

The agar well diffusion method betrothed for the investigation during the examination was customized by W. M. M. Kirby and his coworkers in 1956 at the University Of Washington School Of Medicine. Firstly, spread the inoculum evenly on the surface of solidified medium by means of autoclaved cotton swab in every direction. Ultimately, cork borer no. 4 is subjected to grounding of well in the middle of petri plate having medium and plant macerate was added in the hole with the help of dropper or pipette. The petri plates were sealed with cling film.Label the plate and this process is repeated three times because of observation recorded in triplicate for accurate readings. When purpose is to record antibacterial potential, then the plates were positioned in incubator for 24 hours at37
±
2°C whereas, in the condition of evaluation of antifungal potential, the plates were positioned for 48 hours at 25
±
2°C and solvents employed for maceration process utilized as negative control.


### 2.7.1. Measurement of Zone of Inhibition

Dimension of zone was estimated through measuring the diameter of zone via ruler or Vernier caliper which was produced as a result of restricting the growth of microbes around plant macerate. The back side of petri plate was apprehended few inches left and to authenticate the readings the diameter was noted. Growth extended from disk to margin was estimated as a zone having length of 0 mm.


### 2.7.2. Estimation of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

For the estimation of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), the methanolic extracts ofChenopodium ambrosioides L. including bark and fruit were utilized.


## 2.7.1. Measurement of Zone of Inhibition

Dimension of zone was estimated through measuring the diameter of zone via ruler or Vernier caliper which was produced as a result of restricting the growth of microbes around plant macerate. The back side of petri plate was apprehended few inches left and to authenticate the readings the diameter was noted. Growth extended from disk to margin was estimated as a zone having length of 0 mm.


## 2.7.2. Estimation of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

For the estimation of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), the methanolic extracts ofChenopodium ambrosioides L. including bark and fruit were utilized.


## 2.8. Preparation of Plant Sample

The different concentrations of plant macerate were practiced for MIC that was 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100 mg/mL.


### 2.8.1. MIC Assay

The MIC appraisal was followed as reported Murray et al. [9] with slightly altering this technique. According to this technique, two series of test tubes were made. Each series has 10 test tubes. Dilution of plant extracts ranges from 10 to 100 mg/mL for a single antimicrobial strain. One test tube series was labeled as control whereas other series of test tubes was labeled for the experimental intentions. Then 1 μL microbial suspension, 1 μL stock plant dilution, 2.5 μL medium (nutrient broth for bacteria and malt extract for fungi), and 3 mL of sterilized water were put in tubes. In the same way, all the series of the test tubes were sustained. Amount of medium and inoculum which was prepared remains constant while changing the concentration of plant extracts and water also poured in same quantity.The test tubes which were prepared are positioned in the incubator at 37 ± 2°C for 24 hours while in the case of antifungal potential they were incubated at 25 ± 2°C for 48 hours; readings were noted via spectrophotometer at the 595 nm absorbance.


## 2.8.1. MIC Assay

The MIC appraisal was followed as reported Murray et al. [9] with slightly altering this technique. According to this technique, two series of test tubes were made. Each series has 10 test tubes. Dilution of plant extracts ranges from 10 to 100 mg/mL for a single antimicrobial strain. One test tube series was labeled as control whereas other series of test tubes was labeled for the experimental intentions. Then 1 μL microbial suspension, 1 μL stock plant dilution, 2.5 μL medium (nutrient broth for bacteria and malt extract for fungi), and 3 mL of sterilized water were put in tubes. In the same way, all the series of the test tubes were sustained. Amount of medium and inoculum which was prepared remains constant while changing the concentration of plant extracts and water also poured in same quantity.The test tubes which were prepared are positioned in the incubator at 37 ± 2°C for 24 hours while in the case of antifungal potential they were incubated at 25 ± 2°C for 48 hours; readings were noted via spectrophotometer at the 595 nm absorbance.


## 2.9. Estimation of Antioxidant Activity

Following techniques were used for the estimation antioxidant potential ofChenopodium ambrosioides L.


### 2.9.1. Estimation of Total Flavonoid Contents (TFC)

Determination of total flavonoids contents of plant fractions was reported by Dewanto et al. [10]. We measured 250 μL (500 μg/mL) plant dilution, 1250 μL distilled water, and 75 μL (5%) NaNO2 that then were transferred into the test tubes. These test tubes were put in incubator for 5 minutes. Afterward, 150 μL 10% AlCl3 was added subsequent to the addition of 500 μL. 1 M NaOH. Wait for 6 minutes and then add 275 μL sterilized water and raise the final volume up to 2.5 mL. Through spectrophotometer, estimation of the flavonoid content was determined at 510 nm.


### 2.9.2. Estimation of Total Phenolic Contents (TPC)

Makkar et al. (1993) [11] proposed the procedure for investigation of total phenolic contents. Weigh 100 μg/mL plant extract, 2.8 mL of 10% Na2CO3, and 0.1 mL of 2 N FC reagent transferred to test tube after being incubated at room temperature for 40 minutes and absorbance was calculated at 725 nm.


### 2.9.3. DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity

Precisely 1000μL of plant dilution poured into test tube was measured and mixed with 2.5 mL of DPPH solution which was freshly prepared. The solution which is formed was shaken and permissible to stand at room temperature for 45–60 minutes. After the incubation, DPPH reduced the solution and the changing of colour takes place. The colour was changed from purple to yellow which revealed that the end point of reaction has been reached. After that, the absorbance of solution was noted at the 515 nm wavelength via spectrophotometer.


### 2.9.4. Metal Chelating Activity

Dinis et al. [12] proposed the method for calculating the capacity of plant macerate to chelate iron. Then we measured plant material (100 μL), FeSO4 (50 μL), and 200 μL ferrozine. The mixture was shaken and volume was raised up to 4 mL with ethanol solution. Dynamically shake the mixture. The mixture kept at room temperature for 10 minutes and at 562 nm wavelength its values were noted through spectrophotometer.


### 2.9.5. ABTS+ Assay

Miller and Rice (1993) firstly developed the ABTS
∙
+ assay and further improvement was made by Re et al. [13]. The evaluation of antioxidant potential of ABTS
∙
+ assay was done as proposed by Re et al. (1991). Absorbance of ABTS
∙
+ solution was adjusted to 0.68–0.72 at 734 nm by the addition of PBS buffer and as A
0 (absorbance of control). For the estimation of antioxidant activity, 2990 μL of ABTS
∙
+ solution was added in 10 μL of plant sample in reaction tube, followed by the shaking of mixture, and the change was noted in absorbance after every 1-minute interval for 8 minutes.


## 2.9.1. Estimation of Total Flavonoid Contents (TFC)

Determination of total flavonoids contents of plant fractions was reported by Dewanto et al. [10]. We measured 250 μL (500 μg/mL) plant dilution, 1250 μL distilled water, and 75 μL (5%) NaNO2 that then were transferred into the test tubes. These test tubes were put in incubator for 5 minutes. Afterward, 150 μL 10% AlCl3 was added subsequent to the addition of 500 μL. 1 M NaOH. Wait for 6 minutes and then add 275 μL sterilized water and raise the final volume up to 2.5 mL. Through spectrophotometer, estimation of the flavonoid content was determined at 510 nm.


## 2.9.2. Estimation of Total Phenolic Contents (TPC)

Makkar et al. (1993) [11] proposed the procedure for investigation of total phenolic contents. Weigh 100 μg/mL plant extract, 2.8 mL of 10% Na2CO3, and 0.1 mL of 2 N FC reagent transferred to test tube after being incubated at room temperature for 40 minutes and absorbance was calculated at 725 nm.


## 2.9.3. DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity

Precisely 1000μL of plant dilution poured into test tube was measured and mixed with 2.5 mL of DPPH solution which was freshly prepared. The solution which is formed was shaken and permissible to stand at room temperature for 45–60 minutes. After the incubation, DPPH reduced the solution and the changing of colour takes place. The colour was changed from purple to yellow which revealed that the end point of reaction has been reached. After that, the absorbance of solution was noted at the 515 nm wavelength via spectrophotometer.


## 2.9.4. Metal Chelating Activity

Dinis et al. [12] proposed the method for calculating the capacity of plant macerate to chelate iron. Then we measured plant material (100 μL), FeSO4 (50 μL), and 200 μL ferrozine. The mixture was shaken and volume was raised up to 4 mL with ethanol solution. Dynamically shake the mixture. The mixture kept at room temperature for 10 minutes and at 562 nm wavelength its values were noted through spectrophotometer.


## 2.9.5. ABTS+ Assay

Miller and Rice (1993) firstly developed the ABTS
∙
+ assay and further improvement was made by Re et al. [13]. The evaluation of antioxidant potential of ABTS
∙
+ assay was done as proposed by Re et al. (1991). Absorbance of ABTS
∙
+ solution was adjusted to 0.68–0.72 at 734 nm by the addition of PBS buffer and as A
0 (absorbance of control). For the estimation of antioxidant activity, 2990 μL of ABTS
∙
+ solution was added in 10 μL of plant sample in reaction tube, followed by the shaking of mixture, and the change was noted in absorbance after every 1-minute interval for 8 minutes.


## 2.10. Statistical Analysis of Assessment

All parameters were carried out in the form of triplicates and findings attained were analyzed statistically to conclude the considerable value of analysis.


## 3. Results and Discussion

The method used for the extraction of the compound was measured to be a crucial factor because different parameters were considered in this regard, that is, commercial viability, extraction yield, and its quality. The technique which is used for this research was maceration of plants because it provides remarkable percentage extraction and it is more cost effective than other techniques [14]. The highest yield was obtained from bark ofC. ambrosioides L., that is, 15.45% (Figure 2). The similar results had been shown by Ajaib et al. [2] when investigatingNotholirion thomsonianum. The difference in percentage extraction yield is because of two reasons. First of all, the % extraction yield increases progressively alongside with the increase in the solvents’ polarity; that is, the % extraction yield has directly proportional relation to the solvents’ polarity index. Secondly, special compounds at hand in the plant matter were soluble in their distinctive solvents and the division of the components was potholed in the various parts of the plant [14].Figure 2
Percentage yield of different parts ofC. ambrosioides.Four bacterial strains including two gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus,Bacillus subtilis) and two gram-negative (Escherichia coli,Pseudomonas aeruginosa) were used for the estimation of antimicrobial activity of bark and fruit ofChenopodium ambrosioidesL. All of these bacteria were pathogenic. Furthermore, two fungal strainsAspergillus oryzae andAspergillus niger were selected for antifungal potential.Standard discs were utilized to find out the receptiveness of the microbial strains used as the test organisms (Tables1 and 2). According to these standards, the specimens were classified as susceptible, intermediate, and resistant-susceptible.Table 1
Zone of inhibition (mm) produced by the bacterial strains against standard antibiotic discs.
Antibiotic standard disc
Conc. (µg)
Zone of inhibition (mm)
S. aureus
E. coli
P. aeruginosa
B. subtilis
Azithromycin
15
16
±
2.5
15
±
1.0
10
±
0.6
22
±
0.6
Piperacillin
15
—
30
±
1.2
20
±
0.4
—
Amoxicillin
20
12
±
1.2
25
±
1.0
0
±
0
10
±
0.2
Ampicillin
10
8
±
1.7
9
±
2.0
—
—
Ceftazidime
30
8
±
0.6
20
±
1.0
0
±
0
—
Cefotaxime
10
35
±
2.5
13
±
1.7
0
±
0
8
±
0.2
Amikacin
30
18
±
0.8
—
21
±
1.0
—
Final response
Resistant-susceptible
Intermediate-susceptible
Susceptible
Resistant-susceptibleTable 2
Zone of inhibition (mm) of fungal strains against the standard antifungal discs.
Antifungal standard disc
Conc. (µg/mL)
Zone of inhibition (mm)
A. niger
A. oryzae
Nystatin
100
24
±
2.0
32
±
1.5
Tezole
100
22
±
0.5
69
±
2.9
Fungivin
100
15
±
3.4
42
±
1.7
Griseofulvin
100
22
±
0.5
27
±
0.5
Final response
Intermediate
IntermediateMethanol extract of fruit had exhibited maximum potential as compared to bark of methanol extract. Differing from methanol results, petroleum ether bark showed better antimicrobial potential as compared to fruit. The chloroform extract of both parts of both parts had displayed somewhat similar potential, that is,12
±
1.5 and 12
±
1. The minimum potential is showed by aqueous extracts of both parts. Aqueous extracts failed to show any activity againstE. coli (Table 3; Figure 3).Table 3
Zone of inhibition produced by extracts of different parts ofC. ambrosioides against E. coli.
Plant parts
Zone of inhibition (mm)
Petroleum ether
Methanol
Chloroform
Aqueous
Bark
13
±
1
16
±
1
12
±
1.5
0
±
0
Fruit
11
±
0.5
19
±
1
12
±
1
0
±
0
LSD
0.582
2.267
2.92
0
The results reported were run in triplicate and stated as mean ± standard error. LSD stands for least significant difference.Figure 3
Zone of inhibition produced by different parts ofambrosioides againstE. coli.The maximum potential is exhibited by methanol bark extract as compared to methanol fruit extract. Similarly, bark extract of petroleum ether showed good potential compared to petroleum ether fruit extract. Chloroform extract of both parts exhibited close antibacterial potential, that is,14
±
1 and 15
±
1. The minimum potential was showed by aqueous extracts of both parts. Aqueous extracts failed to show any activity againstS. aureus (Table 4; Figure 4).Table 4
Zone of inhibition produced by extracts of different parts ofC. ambrosioides against S. aureus.
Plant parts
Zone of inhibition (mm)
Petroleum ether
Methanol
Chloroform
Aqueous
Bark
30
±
1
30
±
1.5
14
±
1
0
±
0
Fruit
17
±
1
19
±
1
15
±
1
0
±
0
LSD
2.267
2.92
2.267
0Figure 4
Zone of inhibition produced by different parts ofC. ambrosioides againstS. aureus.The extract of bark had exhibited maximum potential againstP. aeruginosa as compared to the fruit of with the chloroform extract. The petroleum ether extract of fruit exhibited more potential as compared to bark. Methanol extract of both parts possesses same potential, that is, 29
±
0.5. The minimum potential was showed by aqueous extracts of both parts. Aqueous extracts failed to show any activity againstP. aeruginosa(Table 5; Figure 5).Table 5
Zone of inhibition produced by extracts of different parts ofC. ambrosioides against P. aeruginosa.
Plant parts
Zone of inhibition (mm)
Petroleum ether
Methanol
Chloroform
Aqueous
Bark
20
±
1.5
29
±
0.5
30
±
1
0
±
0
Fruit
28
±
1.5
29
±
0.5
20
±
1.5
0
±
0
LSD
3.46
2.06
2.92
0Figure 5
Zone of inhibition produced by different parts ofC. ambrosioides againstP. aeruginosa.Bark extract of petroleum ether exhibited highest potential as compared to fruit extract. The methanolic extract of fruit had more potential than bark extract. Chloroform extract of bark proved to be more potent than fruit. Aqueous extracts of both parts showed minimum potency. Bark extract of petroleum ether exhibited excellent activity againstB. subtilis.Aqueous extract of both parts fails to show any activity (Table 6; Figure 6).Table 6
Zone of inhibition produced by extracts of different parts ofC. ambrosioides against B. subtilis.
Plant parts
Zone of inhibition (mm)
Petroleum ether
Methanol
Chloroform
Aqueous
Bark
33
±
1.5
15
±
1
25
±
0.5
0
±
0
Fruit
28
±
0.5
20
±
1.5
19
±
1
0
±
0
LSD
3.46
2.92
0.582
0Figure 6
Zone of inhibition produced by different part ofC. ambrosioides againstB. subtilis.Bark extract of chloroform exhibited maximum potential as compared to fruit extract. Contrary to the extract of chloroform, fruit extract is proved to be more efficient than bark macerated in petroleum ether. Methanolic extract of both parts exhibited somewhat same potential, that is,15
±
1 and 15
±
1.5. Minimum potential is exhibited by aqueous extracts. Aqueous extract of both parts failed to show any activity (Table 7; Figure 7).Table 7
Zone of inhibition produced by extracts of different parts ofC. ambrosioides against A. oryzae.
Plant parts
Zone of inhibition (mm)
Petroleum ether
Methanol
Chloroform
Aqueous
Bark
11
±
0.5
15
±
1
15
±
2
0
±
0
Fruit
11
±
1.5
15
±
1.5
14
±
2.64
0
±
0
LSD
2.61
2.92
5.315
0Figure 7
Zone of inhibition produced by different parts ofC. ambrosioides againstA. oryzae.Fruit extract of methanol exhibited maximum potential as compared to bark. Similarly, fruit extract showed more potential as compared to bark macerated in petroleum ether. Minimum potential is exhibited by aqueous extracts. The fruit extract showed good activity againstA. niger. Aqueous extract of both parts failed to show any activity (Table 8; Figure 8).Table 8
Zone of inhibition produced by extracts of different parts ofC. ambrosioides against A. niger.
Plant parts
Zone of inhibition (mm)
Petroleum ether
Methanol
Chloroform
Aqueous
Bark
10
±
0.57
12
±
1
13
±
1.5
0
±
0
Fruit
11
±
1
16
±
1.5
11
±
0.5
0
±
0
LSD
0.582
2.92
4.336
0Figure 8
Zone of inhibition produced by different parts ofC. ambrosioides againstA. niger.Figure 9
MIC values (mg/mL) exhibiting potential of bark and fruit ofC. ambrosioides againstE. coli.The potential ofChenopodium ambrosioides L. against bacterial strains wasB. subtilis >S. aureus >P. aeruginosa >E. coli.The antimycotic potential ofC. ambrosioides L. against fungal strain wasA. oryzae >A. niger (Figure 10). All extracts showed good to satisfactory results against bacterial and fungal strains. Methanolic extracts showed maximum potential as compared to other extracts against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (Figure 11).Figure 10
MIC values (mg/mL) exhibiting potential of bark and fruit ofC. ambrosioides againstS. aureus.Figure 11
MIC values (mg/mL) exhibiting potential of bark and fruit ofC. ambrosioides againstP. aeruginosa.Minimum inhibitory concentration was carried out through broth agar dilution method. Following this technique 10 dilutions were prepared against all selected bacterial selected strains and minimum concentration achieved which restrict the growth of bacteria at that concentration. Bark possesses0.043
±
0.01 at 0.8 mg/mL againstP. aeruginosa which was minimum amongst all bacterial strains. Fruit possesses 0.009
±
0.02 at 0.7 mg/mL concentration againstS. aureus.Bark and fruit extracts seem to be more effective againstS. aureusamongst all bacterial strains (Figure 12).Figure 12
MIC values (mg/mL) exhibiting potential of bark and fruit ofC. ambrosioides againstB. subtilis.Dilutions were also made against fungal strains. Bark possesses0.043
±
0.01 at 1 mg/mL concentration againstA. oryzaewhich was more efficient thanA. niger.Fruit exhibited 0.054
±
0.01 againstA. nigerat 0.8 mg/mL concentration. Bark proved to be more competent againstA. oryzaewhereas fruit extract proved more competent againstA. niger(Figures 13 and 14).Figure 13
MIC values (mg/mL) exhibiting potential of bark and fruit ofC. ambrosioides againstA. oryzae.Figure 14
MIC values (mg/mL) exhibiting potential of the bark and fruit ofC. ambrosioides againstA. niger.The antioxidant activity was determined by using five assays TPC, TFC, ABTS, metal chelating activity, and DPPH. Antioxidant compounds obtained from plants were documented as free radicals. Trend has been changed significantly, as there is increased consideration to explore natural possessions having antioxidant potential and can substitute synthetic antioxidants [2].Aqueous extract of fruit had exhibited maximum potential compared to aqueous extract of bark. Petroleum ether bark extract had more potential as compared to fruit extract. Fruit had exhibited more potential than bark macerated in methanol. Differing from methanol results, bark of chloroform extract showed more gallic acid equivalent (μg/mL) than of fruit. Highest gallic acid equivalent (μg/mL) value is exhibited by fruit aqueous extract, that is, 1076
±
0.3 μg/mL. The values showed presence of total phenolic contents in both parts of plant (Figure 15).Figure 15
Total phenolic contents (TPC) of different parts ofC. ambrosioides.Maximum potential is exhibited by bark extract as compared to fruit macerated in distilled water. Following aqueous extract, all bark extracts had exhibited more catechin (μg/mL) values as compared to fruit extracts. Highest amount of flavonoid contents was present in aqueous bark extract, that is, 1997.09
±
1.5 μg/mL, whereas petroleum ether fruit extract possesses minimum catechin value, that is, 714.36
±
0.2 μg/mL. Bark ofC. ambrosioidesL. proved to be more efficient than that of fruit. The highest peak is also depicted by aqueous extract of bark (Figure 16).Figure 16
Total flavonoids content (TFC) of different parts ofC. ambrosioides.Aqueous bark extract exhibited maximum TEAC value (mM) as compared to fruit extract. Similarly, bark extract of petroleum ether and methanol had exhibited more potential than fruit extract whereas chloroform extract of fruit proved to be more efficient than that of chloroform extract of bark. The maximum TEAC value is exhibited by aqueous extract of bark, that is,10.22
±
0.9 mM and 5.21
±
0.6 mM minimum TEAC value which was exhibited by petroleum ether fruit extract. The highest and lowest peak are depicted by aqueous extract of bark and petroleum ether fruit extract correspondingly (Figure 17).Figure 17
ABTS activity of different parts ofC. ambrosioides.Aqueous extract of fruit had exhibited maximum percentage (%) bound iron as compared to fruit extract. Following aqueous extract, petroleum ether and methanol extract of fruit exhibited more percentage (%) bound iron values than bark extract. Contrary to other extracts, chloroform bark proved to be more efficient than fruit. The maximum % bound iron is exhibited by aqueous fruit, that is,76.99
±
1.7%, and minimum % bound iron is showed by fruit chloroform extract, that is, 7.55
±
1.2%. The highest peak and lowest peak are depicted by aqueous and chloroform extract of fruit, respectively (Figure 18).Figure 18
Metal chelating activity of different parts ofC. ambrosioides.Bark extract had exhibited maximum % DPPH (remaining) value compared to fruit macerated with petroleum ether. Following the petroleum ether extract, methanol and aqueous extract of bark had more % DPPH (remaining) as compared to fruit. Contrary to other extracts, chloroform fruit proved to be more efficient than fruit. The highest % DPPH (remaining) is showed by petroleum ether bark extract, that is, 34.1%, and minimum value is exhibited by fruit petroleum ether extract, that is, 17.4% (Figures19 and 20).Figure 19
DPPH kinetic curve of bark extract ofC. ambrosioides.Figure 20
DPPH kinetic curve of fruit extract ofC. ambrosioides.


## 4. Conclusions

The assessment of antimicrobial activity exhibited that both parts have maximum to minimum activity against bacterial strains (Figures21–26). Minimum potential is showed by aqueous extracts of both plants against bacteria. The plants also showed good to satisfactory potential against fungal strains but both plants had more antibacterial potential as compared to antifungal. The antioxidant activity revealed that both plants show good potential for TPC, TFC, DPPH, and ABTS assay and metal chelating. The aqueous extract of both parts of selected plant exhibited significant response for TPC, TFC, and metal chelating whereas methanol depicted good response to ABTS assay; aqueous and petroleum ether extract have shown good potency for DPPH. The result indicated good antimicrobial and antioxidant potential and further studies ofC. ambrosioidesL might reveal some new bioactive compounds that would make contribution to the ethnopharmacology.Figure 21
Zone of inhibition of methanol extract of bark ofC. ambrosioides L. againstB. subtilis.Figure 22
Zone of inhibition of methanol extract of fruit ofC. ambrosioides L. againstB. subtilis.Figure 23
Zone of inhibition of petroleum ether extract of fruit ofC. ambrosioides L. againstP. aeruginosa.Figure 24
Zone of inhibition of petroleum ether extract of bark ofC. ambrosioides L. againstP. aeruginosa.Figure 25
Zone of inhibition of petroleum ether extract of bark ofC. ambrosioides L. againstP. aeruginosa.Figure 26
Zone of inhibition of chloroform extract of bark ofC. ambrosioides L. againstP. aeruginosa.



---

*Source: 4827157-2016-11-10.xml*