# Design Variations on Planar Differential Antenna with Potential for Multiple, Wide, and Narrow Band Coverage

Authors: Domenico Pepe; Luigi Vallozzi; Hendrik Rogier; Domenico Zito
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

This paper presents three practical antenna implementations based on variations of one general planar differential antenna topology originally proposed for ultrawideband (UWB) applications. All designs were implemented on a low-cost FR4 substrate and experimentally characterized in an anechoic chamber. The results show how the proposed design variations lead to the required antenna performances and how they give rise to new opportunities in terms of coverage of wide, narrow, and multiple frequency bands for communication and sensing applications below 5 GHz. In particular, the results show how a significant enhancement in bandwidth performance is achieved by folding the differential radiating elements. Moreover, they show how an agile design strategy enables adaption of the antenna design to different requirements for covering wide, narrow, and multiple bands, making the proposed class of antennas suitable for different wireless applications. In detail, the proposed class of antennas covers multiple frequency bands, ranging from the 868 MHz and 915 MHz bands to 2.4 GHz industrial scientific and medical (ISM) bands, including the 1.2 GHz L band for Global Positioning and Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) and the lower portion of the UWB band.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Often, antenna designers develop novel antenna topologies, which are then optimized by hand for their specific applications and frequency bands. After fabricating the antenna and verifying the compliance of the performance with the requirements, additional efforts are rarely taken into account to exploit the full potential offered by the intrinsic properties of the antenna topology. In this paper, we explore the generation of novel planar antenna designs by varying the different design parameters of a well-established antenna topology. As a starting point, we consider a novel planar differential antenna that was recently proposed by our research group [1]. Such an antenna was designed to meet the design constraints, electromagnetic performance, and physical integration, required by the ultrawideband (UWB) pulse radar sensor operating approximately in the frequency band from 3 to 5 GHz. The radar sensor was implemented by cointegrating the system-on-a-chip radar transceiver with transmitting and receiving antennas on FR4 substrate [2, 3].In this paper, we report for the first time the design variations of the original antenna topology, resulting in a class of antennas that cover a variety of different wide and narrow frequency bands, relevant to several wireless communication protocols. The proposed approach is validated by simulations and experimental characterizations, resulting in novel antenna prototypes that were not reported in our previous publications, which focused exclusively on the novel antenna design targeting the cointegration with the radar microchip [2–4]. In particular, we show how the design variations reflect on the antenna performance, demonstrating that the antenna topology, originated from radiating elements with a particular shape, can be adapted to generate novel prototypes that cover wide and narrow bands of interest for a number of wireless communication and sensing applications, as a consequence of variations in size and orientation of the radiating elements. The results show also how the design variations of the orientation of the two differential radiating elements can lead to a significant additional contribution to the bandwidth enhancement. This results in an additional opportunity for obtaining ultrawideband antenna performance, whereas conventional design efforts are traditionally limited to ad hoc shaping of the radiating elements, be it patches, slots, or their combinations, with circular, elliptical, rectangular, triangular, or any other ad hoc shapes, capable of providing wideband performance (e.g., [5–12]).The paper is organized as follows. Section2 describes the novel antenna design and summarizes, for reasons of self-consistency, the main results obtained for the original planar differential antenna design, which serves as a useful reference for both design and performance. Section 3 reports the results of simulations and measurements obtained for the design variations of the original antenna. Finally, in Section 4, the conclusions are drawn.


## 2. Planar Differential Antenna: Original Design

The original planar differential antenna was designed on a low-cost FR4 substrate (εr = 4.4, dielectric thickness equal to 1.6 mm, copper thickness of 35 μm, and loss tangent equal to 0.02) for a complete characterization as a stand-alone device, as shown in Figure 1. The antenna was simulated by means of momentum and FEM by Agilent Technologies. Each radiating element of the antenna consists of a semicircle and a triangle that provides a smooth transition towards the microchip pins [1]. The antenna terminals (inp and inm in Figure 1) are designed in order to realize the appropriate feeding from the transmitter and to the receiver of the radar microchip pins [2, 3, 13, 14].Figure 1
Original planar differential antenna. (a) Layout drawing in which the top copper layer is in light grey and the bottom copper layer is in dark grey. (b) Photograph of the physical implementation.
(a)
(b)Traditionally the radiating elements of a differential antenna are pointed towards opposite directions (i.e., antipodal): here, we note that, in this novel planar differential antenna, the two radiating elements are “folded” (i.e., rotated on the antenna plane;ρ = 45 degrees) one aside the other, resulting adjacent. The main features of this design approach are that it allows a compact design of both the transmitter and receiver antennas on the same board of the radar sensor, still maintaining good performance [1, 3]. The distance d between the two sides of the antenna is equal to 1 mm. The diameter D is equal to 3 cm in order to resonate at the frequency of interest (about 3 GHz). The aperture angle α of the triangle is equal to 45 degrees. The rotation angle ρ between the symmetry axes of the two radiating elements is 45 degrees. Two microstrip feeding lines were added in order to allow the connection to the Vector Network Analyzer (PNA-X by Agilent Technologies) by means of planar SMA connectors (horizontal) and carry out the experimental tests. The width of the microstrip feeding lines (WP) is equal to 3 mm in order to exhibit a 50 Ω characteristic impedance. The distance din between the two inputs of the antenna is equal to 1 cm to allow the placement of two adjacent connectors, as shown in Figure 1. The characteristic sizes of the UWB antenna are reported in Table 1. Differential S11 parameter and gain patterns were measured in an anechoic chamber by means of a linearly polarized UWB horn antenna and an automated positioning system with full rotation angle capability. The measured parameters are obtained by means of the balanced differential measurement capabilities of the PNA-X [15] and the theory of combined differential and common-mode scattering parameters [16]. The experimental setup for the antenna patterns is shown in Figure 3.Table 1
Folded planar differential antenna sizing (D = 3 cm).
D [cm]
α [deg]
ρ [deg]
d [mm]
W
p [mm]
d
in [cm]
W
GND [cm]
L
GND [cm]
L [cm]
3
45
45
1
3
1
7.1
2.3
7.9The simulated and measured differentialS11 parameter and VSWR are reported in Figure 2. Measured S11 exhibits a magnitude lower than −10 dB in the band of interest, that is, roughly from 3 to 5 GHz. Figure 2 also reports the results for the voltage wave standing ratio (VSWR), which is lower than two over the band from 2.8 to about 4.5 GHz. The simulated and measured differential gain patterns for the xz and yz planes, at 3, 4, (mid-point) and 5 GHz are shown in Figure 4. The gain is equal to about 2.4 dBi at 4 GHz for theta equal to 0 degrees. Figure 5 shows the near field distributions that could be useful to gain an insight of the emission [17] in the proposed antenna. The red zones identify the regions of maximum emission.Figure 2
Measured and simulatedS11 and VSWR versus frequency of the original planar differential antenna with folded elements (ρ=45 deg; D=3 cm).Figure 3
Measurement setup for the experimental characterization of the stand-alone antenna in anechoic chamber. (a) Linearly polarized UWB standard gain horn antenna. (b) Antenna under test on a rotating polystyrene arm. Measurement cables where covered with RF shielding sheets in order to reduce possible unwanted interference.
(a)
(b)Figure 4
Simulated and measured gain patterns for three different frequencies (3, 4, and 5 GHz), onxz and yz planes of the original differential antenna.
(a)
f = 3 GHz (xz plane)
(b)
f = 4 GHz (xz plane)
(c)
f = 5 GHz (xz plane)
(d)
f = 3 GHz (yz plane)
(e)
f = 4 GHz (yz plane)
(f)
f = 5 GHz (yz plane)Figure 5
Simulated total near electric field distributions in the original antenna at the interface antenna-air for three different frequencies.
(a)
f = 3 GHz
(b)
f = 4 GHz
(c)
f = 5 GHz


## 3. Planar Differential Antennas: Design Variations

The nominal antenna design summarized in the previous section is considered as a reference for its variations. A few effective parameter changes in the antennas topology, such as the diameterD and the relative rotation angle ρ of the radiating elements, have a direct impact on antenna frequency coverage. In detail, it is possible to reconfigure the antenna topology from wideband to narrowband performance, by varying the relative orientation of the two radiating lobes from ρ = 45 degrees to ρ = 180 degrees. Moreover, the frequency band of operation can be fine-tuned by rescaling the antenna dimensions. Such readaptation capability of the operating performance, achievable by means of agile topological variations of equal-shape radiating elements, provides new potentiality for future ad hoc designs aimed at the coverage of wide and narrow bands for some of the most widespread unlicensed applications up to 5-6 GHz. In particular, in the sequel we report the following three design variations:ρ = 45 deg; D=4 cm, that is, planar differential antenna with folded radiating elements (ρ = 45 deg), as shown in Figure 1, but with an altered diameter D=4 cm.
(A)
ρ = 180 deg; D=3 cm, that is, planar differential antennas with antipodal radiating elements (ρ = 180), as shown in Figure 6, and with a diameter D=3 cm.(B)
ρ = 180 deg; D=4 cm, that is, planar differential antennas with antipodal radiating elements (ρ = 180 deg), as shown in Figure 6, but with a diameter D=4 cm.Figure 6
Antipodal planar differential antenna. (a) Layout drawing in which the top copper layer is in light grey and the bottom copper layer is in dark grey. (b) Photograph of the physical implementation. The two SMA connectors (vertical) are soldered on the bottom plane.
(a)
(b)


### 3.1. Folded Radiating Elements (ρ=45 deg): D=4 cm

Simulated and measured differentialS11 parameters versus frequency of the antenna with folded radiating elements (ρ = 45 deg; D=4 cm) are shown in Figure 7. All the other design parameters remain unchanged.Figure 7
Measured and simulated differentialS11 and VSWR versus frequency of the planar differential antenna with folded radiating elements and D=4 cm.The measurements show a reflection coefficientS11 lower than approximately −7.5 dB from 2.4 to 5 GHz.In particular,S11<-10 dB roughly from 2.3 to 2.7 GHz and from 3.3 to 5.1 GHz. Figure 7 also reports the simulation and measurement results for the VSWR, which is lower than two over the frequency band from about 2.3 to 2.8 GHz and from 3.3 to 5.1 GHz. The simulated and measured antenna gain patterns for xz and yz planes, at 2.5, 3.75 (mid-point), and 5 GHz are shown in Figure 8. Figure 9 reports the near electric field distributions. As expected, the results confirm that the bandwidth for this design variation with D=4 cm is extended roughly by about 0.5 GHz towards the lower frequencies with respect to the original design with D=3 cm. This result shows that this design variation exhibits the potential for the multiband operation both for the industrial scientific medical (ISM) band at 2.4 GHz [18, 19] and the lower portion of the UWB band from about 3 to 5 GHz [2, 13, 14].Figure 8
Simulated and measured gain patterns for three different frequencies (2.5, 3.75, and 5 GHz), onxz and yz planes of the folded antenna (D=4 cm).
(a)
f = 2.5 GHz (xz plane)
(b)
f = 3.75 GHz (xz plane)
(c)
f = 5 GHz (xz plane)
(d)
f = 2.5 GHz (yz plane)
(e)
f = 3.75 GHz (yz plane)
(f)
f = 5 GHz (yz plane)Figure 9
Simulated total near electric field distributions in the folded differential antenna (D=4 cm) at the interface antenna-air for three different frequencies.
(a)
f = 2.5 GHz
(b)
f = 3.75 GHz
(c)
f = 5 GHz


### 3.2. Antipodal Radiating Elements (ρ=180 deg): D=3 cm

The design parameters are summarized in Table2. The differential S11 parameter and VSWR resulting from simulations and measurements are shown in Figure 10. |S11| is lower than −10 dB in the frequency band from about 1.1 to 1.44 GHz. Simulated and measured antenna gain patterns for xz and yz planes, at 1.2 GHz, are shown in Figure 11. The measured gain amounts to about 1.2 dBi at 1.2 GHz for theta equal to 0 degrees. Similar results were measured at 1.15 and 1.25 GHz. Figure 12 reports the near electric field distribution. A study on other ρ and D variations is reported in the Appendix.Table 2
Antipodal planar differential antenna sizing (D = 3 cm).
D [cm]
α [deg]
ρ [deg]
d
in [cm]
W
GND [cm]
L
GND [cm]
W [cm]
L [cm]
3
45
180
1
0.8
1.4
4
11.2Figure 10
Measured and simulatedS11 and VSWR versus frequency of the planar differential antenna with antipodal radiating elements (D=3 cm).Figure 11
Simulated and measured gain patterns at 1.2 GHz of the planar differential antenna with antipodal radiating elements (D=3 cm): (a) xz plane; (b) yz plane.
(a)
(b)Figure 12
Simulated total near electric field distribution in the planar antipodal antenna (D = 3 cm) at the interface antenna-air for 1.2 GHz.It is also worth observing how this antenna design, generated by the radiating elements with the same shape of the UWB antenna in Figure1, exhibits narrowband performance compatible with the coverage of the lower L band adopted by satellite applications for Global Positioning and Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) [20].Likewise, this result leads to the following interesting observation. Not only is the wideband operation of the folded antenna in Figure1 due to the shape of the radiating elements, which were smoothed in order to provide a wide band operation, but also a relevant contribution is also provided by folding the radiating elements. Therefore, in addition to the research addressed to novel convenient antenna shapes, the potential offered by folding the radiating elements appears being of superior advantage with respect to those inherent in the radiating elements. Hence, this observation suggests new opportunities to achieve wide band operation by also exploiting the folding of the radiating elements.


### 3.3. Antipodal Radiating Elements (ρ=180 deg): D=4 cm

In this design, we haveD=4 cm, L=14.6 cm, and W = 5 cm. All the other design parameters remain unchanged with respect to those summarized for the previous case in Table 2. The S11 parameter and VSWR resulting from simulations and measurements are shown in Figure 13. S11 is lower than −10 dB in the frequency band from about 0.8 to 1.06 GHz.Figure 13
Measured and simulated differentialS11 and VSWR versus frequency of the planar differential antenna with antipodal radiating elements (D=4 cm).Simulated and measured differential antenna gain patterns at 868 MHz forxz and yz planes are shown in Figure 14. The gain is equal to about 1.4 dBi at 868 MHz, for theta equal to 0 degrees. Similar results were measured at 800 and 900 MHz. Figure 15 reports the near electric field distribution.Figure 14
Simulated and measured differential gain patterns at 868 MHz of the antipodal planar differential antenna (D=4 cm): (a) xz plane; (b) yz plane.
(a)
(b)Figure 15
Simulated total near electric field distribution in the antipodal planar differential antenna (D=4 cm) at the interface antenna-air for 868 MHz.It is worth observing how the increase of diameter (D=4 cm) with respect to the case of Figure 3 with D=3 cm allows us to achieve the bandwidth performance required for the potential coverage of the ISM band at 868 MHz [19] and also ultrahigh frequency (UHF) band at 915 MHz for radio-frequency identification (RFID) [21, 22].As already noted in the previous subsection, it is worth observing once again how the folding of the radiating elements as in Figure3 (ρ = 45 deg) leads to an extension of the operation bandwidth with respect to this design case. In particular, by folding the two radiating elements with D=4 cm, we obtain in this case multiple bands, which provide coverage of the 2.4 GHz ISM band and the lower portion (about 3–5 GHz) of the UWB band.This last interesting aspect could be exploited for the implementation of reconfigurable single-antenna single-chip transmitters, or receivers, characterized by highly reusable building blocks [23] and capable of operating over multiple bands, be it narrow and wide bands, both for communication and sensing applications [24].


## 3.1. Folded Radiating Elements (ρ=45 deg): D=4 cm

Simulated and measured differentialS11 parameters versus frequency of the antenna with folded radiating elements (ρ = 45 deg; D=4 cm) are shown in Figure 7. All the other design parameters remain unchanged.Figure 7
Measured and simulated differentialS11 and VSWR versus frequency of the planar differential antenna with folded radiating elements and D=4 cm.The measurements show a reflection coefficientS11 lower than approximately −7.5 dB from 2.4 to 5 GHz.In particular,S11<-10 dB roughly from 2.3 to 2.7 GHz and from 3.3 to 5.1 GHz. Figure 7 also reports the simulation and measurement results for the VSWR, which is lower than two over the frequency band from about 2.3 to 2.8 GHz and from 3.3 to 5.1 GHz. The simulated and measured antenna gain patterns for xz and yz planes, at 2.5, 3.75 (mid-point), and 5 GHz are shown in Figure 8. Figure 9 reports the near electric field distributions. As expected, the results confirm that the bandwidth for this design variation with D=4 cm is extended roughly by about 0.5 GHz towards the lower frequencies with respect to the original design with D=3 cm. This result shows that this design variation exhibits the potential for the multiband operation both for the industrial scientific medical (ISM) band at 2.4 GHz [18, 19] and the lower portion of the UWB band from about 3 to 5 GHz [2, 13, 14].Figure 8
Simulated and measured gain patterns for three different frequencies (2.5, 3.75, and 5 GHz), onxz and yz planes of the folded antenna (D=4 cm).
(a)
f = 2.5 GHz (xz plane)
(b)
f = 3.75 GHz (xz plane)
(c)
f = 5 GHz (xz plane)
(d)
f = 2.5 GHz (yz plane)
(e)
f = 3.75 GHz (yz plane)
(f)
f = 5 GHz (yz plane)Figure 9
Simulated total near electric field distributions in the folded differential antenna (D=4 cm) at the interface antenna-air for three different frequencies.
(a)
f = 2.5 GHz
(b)
f = 3.75 GHz
(c)
f = 5 GHz


## 3.2. Antipodal Radiating Elements (ρ=180 deg): D=3 cm

The design parameters are summarized in Table2. The differential S11 parameter and VSWR resulting from simulations and measurements are shown in Figure 10. |S11| is lower than −10 dB in the frequency band from about 1.1 to 1.44 GHz. Simulated and measured antenna gain patterns for xz and yz planes, at 1.2 GHz, are shown in Figure 11. The measured gain amounts to about 1.2 dBi at 1.2 GHz for theta equal to 0 degrees. Similar results were measured at 1.15 and 1.25 GHz. Figure 12 reports the near electric field distribution. A study on other ρ and D variations is reported in the Appendix.Table 2
Antipodal planar differential antenna sizing (D = 3 cm).
D [cm]
α [deg]
ρ [deg]
d
in [cm]
W
GND [cm]
L
GND [cm]
W [cm]
L [cm]
3
45
180
1
0.8
1.4
4
11.2Figure 10
Measured and simulatedS11 and VSWR versus frequency of the planar differential antenna with antipodal radiating elements (D=3 cm).Figure 11
Simulated and measured gain patterns at 1.2 GHz of the planar differential antenna with antipodal radiating elements (D=3 cm): (a) xz plane; (b) yz plane.
(a)
(b)Figure 12
Simulated total near electric field distribution in the planar antipodal antenna (D = 3 cm) at the interface antenna-air for 1.2 GHz.It is also worth observing how this antenna design, generated by the radiating elements with the same shape of the UWB antenna in Figure1, exhibits narrowband performance compatible with the coverage of the lower L band adopted by satellite applications for Global Positioning and Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) [20].Likewise, this result leads to the following interesting observation. Not only is the wideband operation of the folded antenna in Figure1 due to the shape of the radiating elements, which were smoothed in order to provide a wide band operation, but also a relevant contribution is also provided by folding the radiating elements. Therefore, in addition to the research addressed to novel convenient antenna shapes, the potential offered by folding the radiating elements appears being of superior advantage with respect to those inherent in the radiating elements. Hence, this observation suggests new opportunities to achieve wide band operation by also exploiting the folding of the radiating elements.


## 3.3. Antipodal Radiating Elements (ρ=180 deg): D=4 cm

In this design, we haveD=4 cm, L=14.6 cm, and W = 5 cm. All the other design parameters remain unchanged with respect to those summarized for the previous case in Table 2. The S11 parameter and VSWR resulting from simulations and measurements are shown in Figure 13. S11 is lower than −10 dB in the frequency band from about 0.8 to 1.06 GHz.Figure 13
Measured and simulated differentialS11 and VSWR versus frequency of the planar differential antenna with antipodal radiating elements (D=4 cm).Simulated and measured differential antenna gain patterns at 868 MHz forxz and yz planes are shown in Figure 14. The gain is equal to about 1.4 dBi at 868 MHz, for theta equal to 0 degrees. Similar results were measured at 800 and 900 MHz. Figure 15 reports the near electric field distribution.Figure 14
Simulated and measured differential gain patterns at 868 MHz of the antipodal planar differential antenna (D=4 cm): (a) xz plane; (b) yz plane.
(a)
(b)Figure 15
Simulated total near electric field distribution in the antipodal planar differential antenna (D=4 cm) at the interface antenna-air for 868 MHz.It is worth observing how the increase of diameter (D=4 cm) with respect to the case of Figure 3 with D=3 cm allows us to achieve the bandwidth performance required for the potential coverage of the ISM band at 868 MHz [19] and also ultrahigh frequency (UHF) band at 915 MHz for radio-frequency identification (RFID) [21, 22].As already noted in the previous subsection, it is worth observing once again how the folding of the radiating elements as in Figure3 (ρ = 45 deg) leads to an extension of the operation bandwidth with respect to this design case. In particular, by folding the two radiating elements with D=4 cm, we obtain in this case multiple bands, which provide coverage of the 2.4 GHz ISM band and the lower portion (about 3–5 GHz) of the UWB band.This last interesting aspect could be exploited for the implementation of reconfigurable single-antenna single-chip transmitters, or receivers, characterized by highly reusable building blocks [23] and capable of operating over multiple bands, be it narrow and wide bands, both for communication and sensing applications [24].


## 4. Conclusions

A new class of planar differential antennas is presented through the design variations of a recently proposed planar differential antenna enabling the cointegration with a microchip radar sensor. All the designs were implemented on FR4 substrate and validated through experimental measurements.This study allowed the exploration of the antenna performance and its sensitivity to design variations, their impact on performance, and the opportunities for their potential future exploitations through ad hoc designs for a number of communication and sensing applications below 5 GHz.In particular, the results show how folding the radiating elements allows a significant bandwidth enhancement, even larger than the opportunities deriving from the intrinsic properties of the radiating element itself, as exhibited in the case of antipodal routing.The new opportunities emerging from this study suggest also the possibility of further developing and implementing an agile design strategy, highly readaptable to specific needs and that, thereby, could be applied to a number of cases and applications.Overall, the results show that the design variations originated from the same shape of the radiating elements, be it folded or antipodal design variations, exhibit a good potential for covering wide, narrow, and multiple bands, ranging from those allocated in the ISM frequency band 868 MHz and UHF at 915 MHz and 2.4 GHz band, as well as in the lowerL band at 1.2 GHz and the lower portion of the UWB band. This potential enables their exploitation also for the implementation of multimode multiband reconfigurable radiofrequency transceivers expected for emerging and long term evolution wireless applications.



---

*Source: 478453-2015-05-19.xml*