# Synthesis and Characterization of PVP-Stabilized Palladium Nanoparticles by XRD, SAXS, SP-ICP-MS, and SEM

Authors: Katharina Walbrück; Fabian Kuellmer; Steffen Witzleben; Klaus Guenther
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

Due to increased emissions of palladium nanoparticles in recent years, it is important to develop analytical techniques to characterize these particles. The synthesis of defined and stable particles plays a key role in this process, as there are not many materials commercially available yet which could act as reference materials. Polyvinylpyrrolidone- (PVP-) stabilized palladium nanoparticles were synthesized through the reduction of palladium chloride by tetraethylene glycol (TEG) in the presence of KOH. Four different methods were used for particle size analysis of the palladium nanoparticles. Palladium suspensions were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), single-particle ICP-MS (SP-ICP-MS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Secondary particles between 30 nm and 130 nm were detected in great compliance with SAXS and SP-ICP-MS. SEM analysis showed that the small particulates tend to form agglomerates.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Nanomaterials describe, in principle, materials with at least one dimension in the size range of 1 nm to 100 nm. In particular, due to their unique properties (optical, chemical, mechanical, etc.), they find applications in numerous of industrial and commercial fields. Nanomaterials show great potential in fields of cosmetic, textiles, and medical and healthcare products as well as a food ingredient or in food packaging [1].Nanomaterials are synthesized using two routes: top-down and bottom-up. In top-down approaches, nanomaterials are produced through restructuring a bulk material via mechanical milling, laser ablation, or electroexplosion. In contrast, bottom-up approaches synthesized nanomaterials through a chemical reaction out of small building blocks [2].The stabilization of nanoparticles represents one key challenge in nanomaterial synthesis. Based on their thermodynamic instability, nanoparticles tend to form compact agglomerates. In consequence, the particles need to be stabilized. For nanoparticle stabilization, a variety of different methods are available. The most common method for stabilization is the use of a polymeric stabilizer such as polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP). In his review, Cookson gives an overview about different types of stabilizers for nanoparticles [3].Another key challenge represents the formation of controlled particle sizes and shapes during the synthesis. Therefore, the characterization of particle size and shape has been a very important research focus [4–6].Metal-based nanoparticles have received considerable attention mainly due to their outstanding catalytic, electronic, magnetic, and optical properties [7]. Besides gold and silver, palladium nanoparticles are also of great importance. In particular, the small size makes them attractive for catalytic applications. Due to their large surface-to-volume ratio, they offer a higher catalytic potential than the bulk material [3].In general, platinum group metals (PGM) such as platinum, rhodium, and palladium gained increasing interest in environmental research as they are emitted for example by exhaust fumes into the environment. They act as the catalytic active compounds in catalytic converters of cars. Because of its solubility, palladium can be mobilized into the environment and become biologically available and therefore can have an effect on flora and fauna [8]. It is commonly accepted that the exhausted particulate matter contains PGM nanoparticles that could pose a threat and have a not yet fully explored negative effect on health and environment [9]. Kińska et al. showed that Pd nanoparticles are taken up and accumulated in plant tissues such as Sinapis alba [10] but seem to not have an influence on plant growth and morphology.Compared to other PGM, palladium is attractive because of its lower cost and its high activity towards oxygen reduction reactions [11]. In addition, the hydrogen storage properties of Pd make it an interesting material for many research areas [12], which might even lead to a higher emission rate of palladium in the future.In the synthesis of defined and stable palladium nanoparticles, in particular, the application of different analytical characterization methods plays a key role. The synthesis of shape- and size-controlled palladium nanoparticles in combination with different analytical techniques has been studied only in a few examinations [3, 4, 6]. Yu et al. synthesized palladium icosahedra nanocrystals under microwave irradiation. The particle size determined with XRD, SEM, and TEM was about 31.7 nm. Further methods for sample characterization were XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) and UV-vis spectroscopy [6].Because of the increased use of palladium nanoparticles, it is important to establish more combination sets of analytical methods for the characterization of size and shape of these nanoparticles. Also, the synthesis of palladium nanoparticles will play a key role in that process because reference materials and analytical standards will be needed. Therefore, this paper is focused on the synthesis and particle size characterization of palladium nanoparticles. Palladium nanoparticles were synthesized under different conditions and investigated using four different methods.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Chemicals

Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP,MW=8000 g/mol, Alfa Aesar)-stabilized palladium nanoparticles were synthesized through the reduction of palladium chloride (PdCl2, Alfa Aesar) by tetra ethylene glycol (TEG, Merck) in the presence of potassium hydroxide (KOH, Merck). PdCl2, PVP, and KOH were dissolved in TEG to produce the concentrations of the corresponding solutions. In addition, acetone (C3H6O, VWR) was used to wash the synthesized palladium nanoparticles.


### 2.2. Synthesis of PVP-Pd NPs in an Autoclave under Microwave Irradiation

Palladium nanoparticles were synthesized by the chemical reduction of palladium chloride with TEG under microwave irradiation. Therefore, 5 mL of a 0.03 mol L-1 PdCl2 solution, (a) 5 mL of a 0.15 mol L-1 or (b) 8 mL of a 0.10 mol L-1 PVP solution (in monomeric unit), and 5 mL of (a) 0.05 mol L-1 or (b) 0.16 mol L-1 KOH solution were added to a Teflon digestion vessel. Then, TEG was added to receive a final volume of 50 mL. After stirring, the digestion vessel was placed in the microwave oven and heated for 60 s with 800 W. The resultant solution was centrifuged (3300g) and washed two times with acetone to separate the nanoparticles. Afterwards, the nanoparticles were redispersed in acetone.


### 2.3. Synthesis of PVP-Pd NPs under Normal Pressure

In a 100 mL round bottom flask, 32 mL TEG was heated at 130°C. After 5 h, (c) 5 mL or (d) 10 mL of a 0.03 mol L-1 PdCl2 solution and (c) 8 mL or (d) 5 mL of a 0.10 mol L-1 PVP solution (in monomeric unit) and 5 mL of a 0.16 mol L-1 KOH solution were added dropwise, keeping temperature and stirred for 20 h. Afterwards, the resulting solution was centrifuged (3300g) and washed two times with acetone to separate the nanoparticles. Finally, the nanoparticles were redispersed in acetone.


### 2.4. Characterization

Four different methods were used for particle size analysis of the synthesized palladium nanoparticles. The nanoparticles were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), single-particle ICP-MS (SP-ICP-MS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD).


#### 2.4.1. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

The SEM observations were performed on Zeiss GeminiSEM 500. The nanoparticles were dispersed in acetone, and a drop of this suspension was deposited onto a carbon specimen sample holder.


#### 2.4.2. Single-Particle ICP-MS

NexIon 350D ICP-MS (PerkinElmer) in single-particle mode was used for the analysis of palladium nanoparticles. The instrumental parameters are summarized in Table1. A multielement standard containing 1 μg/L Be, Ce, Fe, In, Li, Mg, Pd, and U in 1% nitric acid was used for optimal sensitivity and precision. A 1000 ppb stock solution of 106Pd was prepared by dissolution of 50 μL palladium standard and 6.75 mL hydrochloric acid in ultrapure water. Working solutions of 0.1, 1, 2.5, 5, and 25 ppb were prepared for calibration. The achieved calibration curve (Figure 1) was y=1.2329x+0.0206, R2=0.9999. The samples were diluted in ultrapure water until the particle concentration is in the range of about 50,000 P/mL. The transport efficiency was determined with a gold particle suspension using the particle frequency method as described by Pace et al. [13].Table 1
Operational parameters for SP-ICP-MS analysis.
Software
SyngistixTM, SyngistixTM Nano Application Module
Element
Palladium 105.903 amuρ=12.023 g/cm3
Flow rate
0.306 mL/min
Transport efficiency
4.38%
Dwell time
50μs
Measurement time
45 s
Mass fraction
100%
Ionization efficiency
100%Figure 1
Calibration curve.


#### 2.4.3. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

X-ray diffraction analysis was carried out with a Bruker D8 Discover diffractometer, with a Cu microfocus X-ray source (λ=0.15418 nm) and a 2-dimensional Vantec 500 detector. A drop of the nanoparticle suspension was deposited onto a glass slide. The measurements were performed in a 2-theta range from 37° to 90°, with an exposure time of 960 s. Further instrumental parameters are given in Table 2. The data analysis was performed using the program Diffrac.Eva (Bruker).Table 2
Operational parameters for XRD analysis.
Software
Bruker Diffrac.XRD (Version 4.0)Bruker Diffrac.EVA (Version 4.1)
Scan type
Coupled two theta/theta
Theta
20°-42.5°
2 theta
40°-85°
Step size
15°
Time per step
240 s
Measurement time
960 s
Steps
4
Collimator
0.5 mm


#### 2.4.4. Small Angle X-Ray Scattering (SAXS)

SAXS measurements were also performed on a Bruker D8 Discover diffractometer, with a Cu microfocus X-ray source and a 2-dimensional Vantec 500 detector. Further instrumental parameters are given in Table3. The synthesized Pd nanoparticle suspensions were injected into a quartz glass capillary and mounted on a capillary sample holder. The measurements were performed in transmission mode, with an exposure time of 90 s. The SAXS data was analyzed using the program Diffrac.Eva (Bruker) and NanoFit (Bruker).Table 3
Operational parameters for SAXS analysis.
Software
Bruker Diffrac.XRD (Version 4.1)Bruker Diffrac.EVA (Version 4.0)Bruker NanoFit (Version 1.2.1)
Scan type
Still (VÅNTEC-500)
Theta
0°
2 theta
0°
Measurement time
90 s
Collimator
0.5 mm


## 2.1. Chemicals

Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP,MW=8000 g/mol, Alfa Aesar)-stabilized palladium nanoparticles were synthesized through the reduction of palladium chloride (PdCl2, Alfa Aesar) by tetra ethylene glycol (TEG, Merck) in the presence of potassium hydroxide (KOH, Merck). PdCl2, PVP, and KOH were dissolved in TEG to produce the concentrations of the corresponding solutions. In addition, acetone (C3H6O, VWR) was used to wash the synthesized palladium nanoparticles.


## 2.2. Synthesis of PVP-Pd NPs in an Autoclave under Microwave Irradiation

Palladium nanoparticles were synthesized by the chemical reduction of palladium chloride with TEG under microwave irradiation. Therefore, 5 mL of a 0.03 mol L-1 PdCl2 solution, (a) 5 mL of a 0.15 mol L-1 or (b) 8 mL of a 0.10 mol L-1 PVP solution (in monomeric unit), and 5 mL of (a) 0.05 mol L-1 or (b) 0.16 mol L-1 KOH solution were added to a Teflon digestion vessel. Then, TEG was added to receive a final volume of 50 mL. After stirring, the digestion vessel was placed in the microwave oven and heated for 60 s with 800 W. The resultant solution was centrifuged (3300g) and washed two times with acetone to separate the nanoparticles. Afterwards, the nanoparticles were redispersed in acetone.


## 2.3. Synthesis of PVP-Pd NPs under Normal Pressure

In a 100 mL round bottom flask, 32 mL TEG was heated at 130°C. After 5 h, (c) 5 mL or (d) 10 mL of a 0.03 mol L-1 PdCl2 solution and (c) 8 mL or (d) 5 mL of a 0.10 mol L-1 PVP solution (in monomeric unit) and 5 mL of a 0.16 mol L-1 KOH solution were added dropwise, keeping temperature and stirred for 20 h. Afterwards, the resulting solution was centrifuged (3300g) and washed two times with acetone to separate the nanoparticles. Finally, the nanoparticles were redispersed in acetone.


## 2.4. Characterization

Four different methods were used for particle size analysis of the synthesized palladium nanoparticles. The nanoparticles were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), single-particle ICP-MS (SP-ICP-MS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD).


### 2.4.1. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

The SEM observations were performed on Zeiss GeminiSEM 500. The nanoparticles were dispersed in acetone, and a drop of this suspension was deposited onto a carbon specimen sample holder.


### 2.4.2. Single-Particle ICP-MS

NexIon 350D ICP-MS (PerkinElmer) in single-particle mode was used for the analysis of palladium nanoparticles. The instrumental parameters are summarized in Table1. A multielement standard containing 1 μg/L Be, Ce, Fe, In, Li, Mg, Pd, and U in 1% nitric acid was used for optimal sensitivity and precision. A 1000 ppb stock solution of 106Pd was prepared by dissolution of 50 μL palladium standard and 6.75 mL hydrochloric acid in ultrapure water. Working solutions of 0.1, 1, 2.5, 5, and 25 ppb were prepared for calibration. The achieved calibration curve (Figure 1) was y=1.2329x+0.0206, R2=0.9999. The samples were diluted in ultrapure water until the particle concentration is in the range of about 50,000 P/mL. The transport efficiency was determined with a gold particle suspension using the particle frequency method as described by Pace et al. [13].Table 1
Operational parameters for SP-ICP-MS analysis.
Software
SyngistixTM, SyngistixTM Nano Application Module
Element
Palladium 105.903 amuρ=12.023 g/cm3
Flow rate
0.306 mL/min
Transport efficiency
4.38%
Dwell time
50μs
Measurement time
45 s
Mass fraction
100%
Ionization efficiency
100%Figure 1
Calibration curve.


### 2.4.3. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

X-ray diffraction analysis was carried out with a Bruker D8 Discover diffractometer, with a Cu microfocus X-ray source (λ=0.15418 nm) and a 2-dimensional Vantec 500 detector. A drop of the nanoparticle suspension was deposited onto a glass slide. The measurements were performed in a 2-theta range from 37° to 90°, with an exposure time of 960 s. Further instrumental parameters are given in Table 2. The data analysis was performed using the program Diffrac.Eva (Bruker).Table 2
Operational parameters for XRD analysis.
Software
Bruker Diffrac.XRD (Version 4.0)Bruker Diffrac.EVA (Version 4.1)
Scan type
Coupled two theta/theta
Theta
20°-42.5°
2 theta
40°-85°
Step size
15°
Time per step
240 s
Measurement time
960 s
Steps
4
Collimator
0.5 mm


### 2.4.4. Small Angle X-Ray Scattering (SAXS)

SAXS measurements were also performed on a Bruker D8 Discover diffractometer, with a Cu microfocus X-ray source and a 2-dimensional Vantec 500 detector. Further instrumental parameters are given in Table3. The synthesized Pd nanoparticle suspensions were injected into a quartz glass capillary and mounted on a capillary sample holder. The measurements were performed in transmission mode, with an exposure time of 90 s. The SAXS data was analyzed using the program Diffrac.Eva (Bruker) and NanoFit (Bruker).Table 3
Operational parameters for SAXS analysis.
Software
Bruker Diffrac.XRD (Version 4.1)Bruker Diffrac.EVA (Version 4.0)Bruker NanoFit (Version 1.2.1)
Scan type
Still (VÅNTEC-500)
Theta
0°
2 theta
0°
Measurement time
90 s
Collimator
0.5 mm


## 2.4.1. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

The SEM observations were performed on Zeiss GeminiSEM 500. The nanoparticles were dispersed in acetone, and a drop of this suspension was deposited onto a carbon specimen sample holder.


## 2.4.2. Single-Particle ICP-MS

NexIon 350D ICP-MS (PerkinElmer) in single-particle mode was used for the analysis of palladium nanoparticles. The instrumental parameters are summarized in Table1. A multielement standard containing 1 μg/L Be, Ce, Fe, In, Li, Mg, Pd, and U in 1% nitric acid was used for optimal sensitivity and precision. A 1000 ppb stock solution of 106Pd was prepared by dissolution of 50 μL palladium standard and 6.75 mL hydrochloric acid in ultrapure water. Working solutions of 0.1, 1, 2.5, 5, and 25 ppb were prepared for calibration. The achieved calibration curve (Figure 1) was y=1.2329x+0.0206, R2=0.9999. The samples were diluted in ultrapure water until the particle concentration is in the range of about 50,000 P/mL. The transport efficiency was determined with a gold particle suspension using the particle frequency method as described by Pace et al. [13].Table 1
Operational parameters for SP-ICP-MS analysis.
Software
SyngistixTM, SyngistixTM Nano Application Module
Element
Palladium 105.903 amuρ=12.023 g/cm3
Flow rate
0.306 mL/min
Transport efficiency
4.38%
Dwell time
50μs
Measurement time
45 s
Mass fraction
100%
Ionization efficiency
100%Figure 1
Calibration curve.


## 2.4.3. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

X-ray diffraction analysis was carried out with a Bruker D8 Discover diffractometer, with a Cu microfocus X-ray source (λ=0.15418 nm) and a 2-dimensional Vantec 500 detector. A drop of the nanoparticle suspension was deposited onto a glass slide. The measurements were performed in a 2-theta range from 37° to 90°, with an exposure time of 960 s. Further instrumental parameters are given in Table 2. The data analysis was performed using the program Diffrac.Eva (Bruker).Table 2
Operational parameters for XRD analysis.
Software
Bruker Diffrac.XRD (Version 4.0)Bruker Diffrac.EVA (Version 4.1)
Scan type
Coupled two theta/theta
Theta
20°-42.5°
2 theta
40°-85°
Step size
15°
Time per step
240 s
Measurement time
960 s
Steps
4
Collimator
0.5 mm


## 2.4.4. Small Angle X-Ray Scattering (SAXS)

SAXS measurements were also performed on a Bruker D8 Discover diffractometer, with a Cu microfocus X-ray source and a 2-dimensional Vantec 500 detector. Further instrumental parameters are given in Table3. The synthesized Pd nanoparticle suspensions were injected into a quartz glass capillary and mounted on a capillary sample holder. The measurements were performed in transmission mode, with an exposure time of 90 s. The SAXS data was analyzed using the program Diffrac.Eva (Bruker) and NanoFit (Bruker).Table 3
Operational parameters for SAXS analysis.
Software
Bruker Diffrac.XRD (Version 4.1)Bruker Diffrac.EVA (Version 4.0)Bruker NanoFit (Version 1.2.1)
Scan type
Still (VÅNTEC-500)
Theta
0°
2 theta
0°
Measurement time
90 s
Collimator
0.5 mm


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. SEM

Figures2 and 3 present the SEM images of palladium nanoparticles, which show that most of the particles have a spherical shape with an average particle size in the range 5-15 nm. In addition, the SEM images indicate the formation of agglomerates.Figure 2
SEM image of approach (a).Figure 3
SEM image of approach (d).


### 3.2. XRD

The X-ray diffractogram of the synthesized palladium nanoparticles is shown in Figure4. As can be seen, the diffraction pattern of the palladium nanoparticles is showing diffraction peaks positioned at the Bragg angles (2Θ) 40.5°, 47.0°, 68.5°, 82.4°, and 87.0°. The observed peaks correspond to the lattice planes (111), (200), (311), and (222). All diffraction peaks can be well indexed to a face-centered cubic lattice system according to the COD database (COD ID: 1011112). The structure parameters of the synthesized palladium nanoparticles are listed in Table 4.Figure 4
XRD pattern of approaches (a)-(d).Table 4
Crystallographic data.
Structure parameters
Palladium nanoparticles
Lattice system
Cubic, face-centered
Space group
Fm-3m
Volume of the primitive cell
57.8 Å
Primitive cell
α=β=γ=90°a=b=c=3.867±0.003Å
Scattering angles
40.5°
47.0°
68.5°
82.4°
87.0°
Miller indices (hkl)
(111)
(200)
(220)
(311)
(222)The crystallite size,L, was calculated using the Scherrer equation
(1)L=KλFWHMcosθ,where K=0.9 is the Scherrer factor, λ the wavelength, FWHM is the full width at half maximum of the peak, and θ the Bragg angle. Table 5 summarizes the obtained crystallite sizes.Table 5
XRD results.
Sample
2 theta (°)
FWHM
Crystallite size (nm)
(a)
87.1°±0.1°
1.1±0.1
12.4±0.3
(b)
87.0°±0.1°
1.1±0.1
13.6±0.8
(c)
87.0°±0.1°
1.1±0.1
11.9±0.6
(d)
86.9°±0.1°
1.1±0.1
12.1±0.7


### 3.3. SAXS

Small angle X-ray scattering is also a powerful method for the determination of size and shape of nanoparticles. Figure5 shows the SAXS patterns of the synthesized palladium nanoparticles. Around the beam stop in the center an isotropic scattering was observed. Compared to the SAXS patterns (b)-(d), an intensive scattering corona around the beam stop could be observed for sample (a).Figure 5
SAXS pattern.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The integration of the SAXS pattern led to the SAXS curves (Figures6 and 7). The intensity of sample (a) is about 100 times higher than for samples (b)-(d).Figure 6
SAXS curve of approach (a).Figure 7
SAXS curve of approaches (b)-(d).These data were used for the calculation of the particle diameter [14, 15] with the program NanoFit (Bruker). The fit of SAXS curves revealed nanoparticle diameters between 34 nm and 132 nm. The particle size of sample (a) is determined as 113.0±0.1 nm. In contrast, sample (d) revealed a particle size of 34.5±0.5 nm. In Table 6, the resulting particle sizes of all SAXS measurements are summarized.Table 6
SAXS results.
Sample
Intensity (cps)
2 theta (°)
d (Å)
Particle diameter (nm)
(a)
435.0±4.4
0.50±0.01
176.1±5.2
113.0±0.1
(b)
4.8±0.6
0.49±0.01
177.8±5.7
131.3±0.8
(c)
4.0±2.6
0.50±0.01
176.1±5.2
45.0±1.7
(d)
1.6±0.1
0.51±0.01
173.1±2.9
34.5±0.5


### 3.4. SP-ICP-MS

The analysis of the synthesized palladium nanoparticles performed by SP-ICP-MS is summarized in Table7. Figure 8 presents the obtained histograms for the analyzed palladium nanoparticles. Nanoparticles in the range 30 nm to 132 nm, with broad size distributions, were obtained by the different synthesis. Even though the method was not validated because of the lack of an appropriate reference material, the results were clearly in compliance with the SAXS results.Table 7
SP-ICP-MS results.
Sample
Particle diameter (nm)
(a)
113.0
(b)
132.0
(c)
42.2
(d)
18.5Figure 8
Histograms of approaches (a)-(d).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.1. SEM

Figures2 and 3 present the SEM images of palladium nanoparticles, which show that most of the particles have a spherical shape with an average particle size in the range 5-15 nm. In addition, the SEM images indicate the formation of agglomerates.Figure 2
SEM image of approach (a).Figure 3
SEM image of approach (d).


## 3.2. XRD

The X-ray diffractogram of the synthesized palladium nanoparticles is shown in Figure4. As can be seen, the diffraction pattern of the palladium nanoparticles is showing diffraction peaks positioned at the Bragg angles (2Θ) 40.5°, 47.0°, 68.5°, 82.4°, and 87.0°. The observed peaks correspond to the lattice planes (111), (200), (311), and (222). All diffraction peaks can be well indexed to a face-centered cubic lattice system according to the COD database (COD ID: 1011112). The structure parameters of the synthesized palladium nanoparticles are listed in Table 4.Figure 4
XRD pattern of approaches (a)-(d).Table 4
Crystallographic data.
Structure parameters
Palladium nanoparticles
Lattice system
Cubic, face-centered
Space group
Fm-3m
Volume of the primitive cell
57.8 Å
Primitive cell
α=β=γ=90°a=b=c=3.867±0.003Å
Scattering angles
40.5°
47.0°
68.5°
82.4°
87.0°
Miller indices (hkl)
(111)
(200)
(220)
(311)
(222)The crystallite size,L, was calculated using the Scherrer equation
(1)L=KλFWHMcosθ,where K=0.9 is the Scherrer factor, λ the wavelength, FWHM is the full width at half maximum of the peak, and θ the Bragg angle. Table 5 summarizes the obtained crystallite sizes.Table 5
XRD results.
Sample
2 theta (°)
FWHM
Crystallite size (nm)
(a)
87.1°±0.1°
1.1±0.1
12.4±0.3
(b)
87.0°±0.1°
1.1±0.1
13.6±0.8
(c)
87.0°±0.1°
1.1±0.1
11.9±0.6
(d)
86.9°±0.1°
1.1±0.1
12.1±0.7


## 3.3. SAXS

Small angle X-ray scattering is also a powerful method for the determination of size and shape of nanoparticles. Figure5 shows the SAXS patterns of the synthesized palladium nanoparticles. Around the beam stop in the center an isotropic scattering was observed. Compared to the SAXS patterns (b)-(d), an intensive scattering corona around the beam stop could be observed for sample (a).Figure 5
SAXS pattern.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The integration of the SAXS pattern led to the SAXS curves (Figures6 and 7). The intensity of sample (a) is about 100 times higher than for samples (b)-(d).Figure 6
SAXS curve of approach (a).Figure 7
SAXS curve of approaches (b)-(d).These data were used for the calculation of the particle diameter [14, 15] with the program NanoFit (Bruker). The fit of SAXS curves revealed nanoparticle diameters between 34 nm and 132 nm. The particle size of sample (a) is determined as 113.0±0.1 nm. In contrast, sample (d) revealed a particle size of 34.5±0.5 nm. In Table 6, the resulting particle sizes of all SAXS measurements are summarized.Table 6
SAXS results.
Sample
Intensity (cps)
2 theta (°)
d (Å)
Particle diameter (nm)
(a)
435.0±4.4
0.50±0.01
176.1±5.2
113.0±0.1
(b)
4.8±0.6
0.49±0.01
177.8±5.7
131.3±0.8
(c)
4.0±2.6
0.50±0.01
176.1±5.2
45.0±1.7
(d)
1.6±0.1
0.51±0.01
173.1±2.9
34.5±0.5


## 3.4. SP-ICP-MS

The analysis of the synthesized palladium nanoparticles performed by SP-ICP-MS is summarized in Table7. Figure 8 presents the obtained histograms for the analyzed palladium nanoparticles. Nanoparticles in the range 30 nm to 132 nm, with broad size distributions, were obtained by the different synthesis. Even though the method was not validated because of the lack of an appropriate reference material, the results were clearly in compliance with the SAXS results.Table 7
SP-ICP-MS results.
Sample
Particle diameter (nm)
(a)
113.0
(b)
132.0
(c)
42.2
(d)
18.5Figure 8
Histograms of approaches (a)-(d).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 4. Conclusion

The synthesis of defined and stable particles plays a key role in the characterization process of nanoparticles. Currently, no reference materials for palladium nanoparticle are commercially availability. Therefore, two preparation methods and different concentrations of PVP-stabilized palladium nanoparticles were evaluated. In order to determine the particle size of the synthesized particles, four different measuring methods have been used. However, the results obtained by the different measuring methods cannot be rigorously compared because these techniques do not measure the same size parameter. SEM allows the determination of the primary particle size, whereas SP-ICP-MS and SAXS measure the mean particle diameter, and the diameters calculated from XRD measurements indicate the crystallite size.The synthesis of Pd nanoparticles with the chosen preparation techniques was successful. Table8 presents a comparative overview of all results. Nanoparticles tend to form relatively compact agglomerates. In particular, the particle size determined by SAXS and SP-ICP-MS was highly affected by the accumulation of agglomerates. In consequence, mostly secondary particles were detected by the use of these methods. To prevent that from happening, the samples might need to be sonicated prior to the measurement. The results obtained from both methods are in good compliance with each other. The results of the SAXS and SP-ICP-MS measurements allow also to distinguish between the two preparation methods. The samples (a) and (b) synthesized in an autoclave under microwave irradiation have a higher particle size than the samples prepared under normal pressure.Table 8
Summary of all results.
Sample
SEM (nm)
XRD (nm)
SAXS (nm)
SP-ICP-MS (nm)
(a)
5-10
12.1±0.7
113.0±0.1
113.0
(b)
/
12.4±0.3
131.3±0.8
132.0
(c)
/
13.6±0.8
45.0±1.7
42.2
(d)
15
11.9±0.6
34.5±0.5
18.5The SEM images indicate the formation of agglomerated small particles with a primary particle size in the range of 5 nm to 15 nm, which are in good agreement with the XRD results.The nanoparticles synthesized in this work are suitable to serve as the first step in the production of reference materials for the improvement of analytical methods. Further studies are necessary to investigate the stabilization and stability of the Pd NPs.



---

*Source: 4758108-2019-04-17.xml*